Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/28/2000 Council PacketAGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday August 28, 2000 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call: Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Minutes i) June 7, 2000 Council Work Session Minutes (CSAH 49) ii) August 2, 2000 Council Work Session Minutes iii) August 9, 2000 Council Work Session Minutes B) Consideration of Expenditures: i) August 28, 2000 (Check No. 59666 — 59785 in the amount of $434,584.48 ) ii) Centennial Fire District C) Block Party at 6345 Red Hawk Trail D) Block Party at 7012 Caribou Circle 2 Open Mike 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch 4. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) Set Public Hearing Date for Minnegasco Franchise Ordinance Public Hearing, (3/5 Vote Required) Linda Waite Smith 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner Page 1 AGENDA 7. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel A) Variance, Steve Krause 8025 Wood Duck Drive (3/5 Vote Required), Mary Kay Wyland B) Minor Subdivision, Steve Benesch — 8251 Lake Drive (3/5 Vote Required), Mary Kay Wyland C) CSAH 49 Update (No Vote Required), John Powell D) Apollo Business Center, Conditional Use Permit (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell E) Marmon Keystone, Site Plan Approval/ Conditional Use Permit (3/5 Vote Required), Jeff Smyser F) Twin City Fab. Inc. Site Plan Approval/ Conditional Use Permit (3/5 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser G) Town Center Design Standards Endorsement ( 3/5 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser H) PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution No. 00 -64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1St and 2 "d Additions, John Powell. (Continue to the September 25, 2000 City Council Meeting) I) Blue Bill Ponds, Final Plat Consideration (3/5 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser J) PUBLIC HEARING, Main Street Trunk Utilities (3/5 Vote Required) John Powell K) Resolution No. 00 -77, Order the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Main Street Trunk Utilities L) Present EDAC Plan, (3/5 Vote Required) Mary Alice Divine 8. Unfinished Business 9. New Business 10. Community Calendar, August 28, through September 12, 2000: A) Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 6:30 p.m., Environmental Board Meeting B) Thursday, August 31, 2000, 8:30 a.m. -3:30 p.m., City Council Budget Work Session Page 2 ■ AGENDA C) Monday, September 4, 2000, CITY HALL CLOSED in Observance of Labor Day D) Wednesday, September 6, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session E) Thursday, September 7, 2000. 7:00 a.m., EDAC F) Monday, September 11, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting G) Tuesday, September 12, 2000, State Primary Election 11. Adjourn Revised 8/23/00 RDG 11:26 a.m. Page 3 EXPENDITURES AUGUST 28, 2000 Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:22:31 Operator: JAL Ranges: Options: Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal #: (R) 1145 - 1145 Bank #: (A) Cash #: (A) Payroll Check Dates: (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount ALLEY, KATHI ANDERSON, DEANNA BETTENDORF, RICHARD BML BUILDERS, INC. BRINTZ, BILL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DUNLEAVY, KATHLEEN EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, HOMES BY JAMES, INC. KUBITSCHEK, SUSAN MCCALLUM CONSTRUCTION, MINARICH, DIANE PERRAULT CONSTRUCTION, PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE SAM'S CLUB, INC. SMITH, PEG SOCKEL, JOE T.K.D.A. VIGER, JEAN REIMBURSE PARK & REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6531 C REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC DENTAL INSURANCE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1115 T REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6750 W REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6563 L LIFE INSURANCE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE PICNIC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC MUNICIPAL ENGINEER MILEAGE /PARKING /EMP PICN * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** ZYLSTRA CYCLE COMPANY SERVICE /REPAIR /LEASE * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** O EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Total for Dept 000 0 MRPA TEAM REGISTRATION Total for Dept 202 0 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES Total for Dept 204 O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES 0 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL S ADMISSION /45 Total for Dept 205 O CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS BUS SERVICE * * * * * * ** ADULT SP OTHER SPECIAL SPECIAL TEEN ACT 50.00 98.00 55.00 500.00 55.00 1,265.45 66.00 250.00 1,000.00 53.00 500.00 47.00 500.00 191.37 53.46 27.73 50.00 12,074.36 5.53 474.20 17,316.10* 125.00 125.00* 834.00 834.00* 22.40 22.40* 31.56 135.00 166.56* 553.10 Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:22:32 Operator: JAL Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 206 553.10* O ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 122.00 0 HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. PIZZA /DELIVERY /TIP YOUTH IN 72.00 0 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 29.89 O METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, ROLLER YOUTH IN 104.32 O NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA OPTIONS PROGRAMS YOUTH IN 7,611.36 O SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES YOUTH IN 18.62 0 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. PHOTOS YOUTH IN 523.00 Total for Dept 207 8,481.19* 0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. SOCCER BALLS /SHIN GUARDS YOUTH SP 2,414.37 Total for Dept 208 2,414.37* O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC AUGUST 9 MAYOR /CO 192.25 Total for Dept 401 192.25* 0 ANDERSON, MARILYN CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT ADMINIST 1,250.00 0 ANOKA COUNTY FILING FEE ADMINIST 65.95 0 D.C.A. INC. FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINIST 241.80 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINIST 77.00 0 FIRSTAR BANK OF HUGO ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FEE ADMINIST 40.00 0 FRANCIS, LINDA REIMBURSE CABLE /SPEAKERS ADMINIST 15.96 0 METROPOLITAN AREA MEETING /L W SMITH ADMINIST 16.00 O MUNICIPAL CLERKS /FINAN MEMBERSHIP /R GAUSTAD ADMINIST 35.00 O PETERSON, KEITH 1/2 REAL ESTATE APPRAISA ADMINIST 250.00 O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST 17.50 O ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS MONTHLY SERVICE ADMINIST 23.40 O VIGER, JEAN MILEAGE /PARKING /EMP PICN ADMINIST 83.75 O WYLAND, CATHY NEWSLETTER ADMINIST 438.75 Total for Dept 402 2,555.11* 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SENIORS 12.03 Total for Dept 406 12.03* O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FINANCE 38.51 O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE FINANCE 7.00 Total for Dept 407 45.51* O MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVI DELIVERY SERVICE ECONOMIC 20.95 0 WESSEL, BRIAN REIMBURSE MAY- AUGUST MEA ECONOMIC 468.16 0 WYLAND, CATHY NEWSLETTER ECONOMIC 97.50 Total for Dept 415 586.61* 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE PLANNING 96.26 O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE PLANNING 7.00 Total for Dept 416 103.26* 0 T.K.D.A. MUNICIPAL ENGINEER Total for Dept 417 ENGINEER 11,334.13 11,334.13* Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:22:33 Operator: JAL Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 A T & T O ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF 0 CAREERTRACK 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O EMERGENCY VEHICLE SUPP 0 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONA 0 GENERAL SECURITY SERVI O I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, O KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL 0 LAW ENFORCEMENT NEWS, O NORTHERN STATES POWER, 0 P.S.E. LIGHTING DIVISI O PETTY CASH 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE 0 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 0 WYLAND, CATHY MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE RANGE USE POLICE REGISTRATION /R KAULFUSS POLICE DENTAL INSURANCE POLICE CHANGE OVER OF EQUIPMENT POLICE DRUG SCREEN POLICE ARTWORK POLICE UNIFORM BADGES POLICE PANELS POLICE SUBSCRIPTION POLICE MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE SPIKE SYSTEM POLICE DC /AC INVERTER POLICE LIFE INSURANCE POLICE MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE NEWSLETTER POLICE Total for Dept 420 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 421 FIRE FIRE O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING O FRANCIS, LINDA REIMBURSE CABLE /SPEAKERS BUILDING 0 PAGENET OF MINNESOTA, MONTHLY SERVICE BUILDING 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE BUILDING 0 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS BUILDING Total for Dept 422 O BOLDT, ROBERT REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW STREETS 0 COLUMBUS, TOWN OF PINE STREET GRAVEL STREETS 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE STREETS 0 DUSTCOATING, INC. DUSTCONTROL STREETS O EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT STREET SIGNS STREETS 0 H & L MESABI, INC. CUTTING EDGE BLADE STREETS 0 MICKELSON, LESTER REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW STREETS 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE STREETS 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE STREETS O RO -S0 CONTRACTING, INC CURB /CATCH BASIN REPAIR STREETS O T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS ASPHALT STREETS O UNITED RENTALS MANHOLE REPAIRS STREETS O VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS SIGNS /BATTERIES /GLOVES /P STREETS Total for Dept 430 O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU O APITZ GARAGE, INC. 0 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 0 CATCO PARTS, INC. 0 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. O DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. SUPPLIES REPAIR #335 PARTS /SUPPLIES CALIPER GREASE REPAIRS /DITCH MOWER GASOHOL FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET 69.42 51.12 89.00 393.12 1,623.45 156.00 133.13 89.66 2,473.86 42.00 3.14 2,897.55 255.58 80.50 118.77 97.50 8,573.80* 31.29 3.50 34.79* 38.50 21.29 22.86 10.50 1,327.20 1,420.35* 69.43 10,553.14 82.11 3,121.50 1,168.84 305.66 82.57 252.12 17.50 5,854.00 2,209.19 659.21 106.13 24,481.40* 116.21 877.28 608.37 14.70 80.41 2,655.87 Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:22:33 Operator: JAL Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description 0 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA SCALE FEE 0 J & E SMALL ENGINE & S PARTS /SUPPLIES 0 LEEF BROTHER, INC. SHOP TOWELS 0 LINO LAKES TRANSMISSIO REBUILT TRANS /4338 0 NEW HOLLAND PLAN MOWER PARTS O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE 0 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, REPAIR TO BACK HOE 0 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, SKID STEER 0 VERMEER OF MINNESOTA PARTS 0 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS TRAFFIC SIGN Total for Dept 431 0 ALLIANCE ENERGY SERVIC STAND -BY GENERATOR 0 CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRU REPAIR /WELL HOUSE #2 0 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, I ANNUAL TESTING O MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE 0 MITY -LITE, INC. PARTS 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE 0 PITNEY WORKS POSTAGE METER RENTAL 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE 0 SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES 0 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE 0 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. THERMOSTAT GUARD 0 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. TOWELS Total for Dept 432 Dept FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET Amount GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 0 DEGARDNER, RICK MILEAGE /ZIP DISC PARKS 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE PARKS O HOFFMAN, MICHAEL REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW PARKS O J & E SMALL ENGINE & S PARTS /SUPPLIES PARKS 0 MENARDS, INC. EARTH ANCHOR /BULB /DRIVER PARKS 0 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS 0 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNC REGISTRATION /TIM H, TOM PARKS 0 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. PARTS PARKS O NATURE CALLS, INC. PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTAL PARKS 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE PARKS 0 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS TONER PARKS O TODORA, GAIL DESIGN NEWSLETTER PARKS O TURF SUPPLIES, INC. TURFACE PARKS 0 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS 0 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS SIGNS /BATTERIES /GLOVES /P PARKS Total for Dept 450 O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES 0 MITY -LITE, INC. PARTS 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE O SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES O TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS TONER RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI 5.00 210.44 13.61 3,269.45 57.02 3.50 3,644.-36 253.43 286.18 53.42 12,149.25* 808.00 934.83 695.00 113.93 782.57 3,209.98 152.88 3.50 113.36 65.08 98.32 59.38 7,036.83* 113.01 123.17 49.99 81.80 595.78 33.12 245.00 946.62 747.45 88.36 24.50 4.00 128.00 2,772.05 118.87 67.79 6,139.51* 19.25 37.77 391.31 17.50 42.45 4.00 Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:22:34 Operator: JAL Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 TODORA, GAIL DESIGN NEWSLETTER RECREATI 512.00 O TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN GLUE RECREATI 25.01 Total for Dept 451 1,049.29* 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC AUGUST 3 Total for Dept 452 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 461 PARK BOA 87.75 87.75* ENVIRONM 1.57 1.57* 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE SOLID WA .35 0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE OIL FILTERS SOLID WA 725.00 O WYLAND, CATHY NEWSLETTER SOLID WA 97.50 Total for Dept 462 822.85* 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 463 FORESTRY 1.58 1.58* 0 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. PARTS /SUPPLIES WATER 2.32 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE WATER 17.32 0 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 179.20 O HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN CHEMICALS WATER 6,296.43 O INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, WATER SAMPLES WATER 63.00 0 MENARDS, INC. DRILL BIT WATER 5.20 0 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 75.85 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE, WATER 900.60 O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE WATER 5.25 0 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, SWIVEL /STRAINER WATER 3,621.02 0 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 37.98 0 WYLAND, CATHY NEWSLETTER WATER 48.75 Total for Dept 494 11,252.92* O C. W. HOULE, INC. CONTRACTOR SEWER 15,883.10 O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SEWER 17.34 O GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 179.20 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 812.13 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE SEWER 5.25 Total for Dept 495 16,897.02* 0 ANOKA COUNTY FILING FEE OTHER 35.50 0 COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF PAY -AS- YOU -GO -TIF OTHER 18,340.00 0 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE OTHER 500.00 O FOREST LAKE AREA JULY BILLING OTHER 400.00 O FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JU LAND PURCHASE OTHER 2,317.58 0 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES WORKSTATION OTHER 330.98 0 NORTH VALLEY, INC. CONTRACTOR /WEAR COURSE OTHER 108,286.59 O T.K.D.A. LAKE DRIVE /APOLLO OTHER 12,442.80 Total for Dept 499 142,653.45* 0 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE TIF ADMI 2,562.50 Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:22:34 Operator: JAL Page: CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 500 2,562.50* 0 NOL -TEC SYSTEMS, INC. PAY -AS- YOU -GO -TIF NOL -TEC 18,841.00 Total for Dept 503 18,841.00* 0 F & G, INC. PAY -AS- YOU -GO -TIF FOGARTY 29,168.00 Total for Dept 505 29,168.00* O LINO LAKES BUSINESS CE PAY -AS- YOU -GO -TIF CUSTOM R 12,567.00 Total for Dept 506 12,567.00* O PROGRESSIVE ENGINEERIN PAY -AS- YOU -GO -TIF PROGRESS 4,034.00 Total for Dept 507 4,034.00* 0 TAYLOR CORPORATION PAY -AS- YOU -GO -TIF ADGRAPHI 38,489.00 Total for Dept 509 38,489.00* 0 NORTHERN WHOLESALE, IN PAY -AS- YOU -GO -TIF NORTHER 36,087.00 Total for Dept 510 36,087.00* O NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT,L PAY -AS- YOU -GO -TIF GNW MECH 15,492.00 Total for Dept 511 15,492.00* Grand Total 434,584.48* Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:14:11 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (A) Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (R) 08282000 - 08282000 Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000052 A T & T 1 69.42 69.42 .00 .00 000134 BOLDT, ROBERT 1 69.43 69.43 .00 .00 000158 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 1 2,414.37 2,414.37 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 1 122.00 122.00 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 2 116.21 116.21 .00 .00 000264 MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. 1 20.95 20.95 .00 .00 000276 ALLIANCE ENERGY SERVICES, INC. 1 808.00 808.00 .00 .00 000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 59.38 59.38 .00 .00 000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00 000340 ANDERSON, MARILYN 1 1,250.00 1,250.00 .00 .00 000368 BML BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000381 ALLEY, KATHI 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000383 BETTENDORF, RICHARD 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 000384 GENERAL SECURITY SERVICES CORPORATION 1 133.13 133.13 .00 .00 000385 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 1 330.98 330.98 .00 .00 000386 MCCALLUM CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000387 PETERSON, KEITH 1 250.00 250.00 .00 .00 000388 PERRAULT CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000389 SOCKEL, JOE 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000391 ZYLSTRA CYCLE COMPANY 1 474.20 474.20 .00 .00 000392 ANDERSON, DEANNA 1 98.00 98.00 .00 .00 000393 DUNLEAVY, KATHLEEN 1 66.00 66.00 .00 .00 Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:14:12 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000394 KUBITSCHEK, SUSAN 1 53.00 53.00 .00 .00 000395 MINARICH, DIANE 1 47.00 47.00 .00 .00 000396 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1 135.00 135.00 .00 .00 000403 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF 1 51.12 51.12 .00 .00 000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 101.45 101.45 .00 .00 000471 APITZ GARAGE, INC. 1 877.28 877.28 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 610.69 610.69 .00 .00 000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 15,883.10 15,883.10 .00 .00 000980 UNITED RENTALS 1 659.21 659.21 .00 .00 000990 NEW HOLLAND PLAN 1 57.02 57.02 .00 .00 001000 CATCO PARTS, INC. 1 14.70 14.70 .00 .00 001008 COLUMBUS, TOWN OF 1 10,553.14 10,553.14 .00 .00 001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 1 553.10 553.10 .00 .00 001230 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 1 80.41 80.41 .00 .00 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 241.80 241.80 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 2,655.87 2,655.87 .00 .00 001298 DEGARDNER, RICK 1 113.01 113.01 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 2,211.35 2,211.35 .00 .00 001339 DUSTCOATING, INC. 1 3,121.50 3,121.50 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 2 1,168.84 1,168.84 .00 .00 001457 F & G, INC. 1 29,168.00 29,168.00 .00 .00 001473 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL HEALTH CARE 1 156.00 156.00 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 6,296.43 6,296.43 .00 .00 001505 FIRSTAR BANK OF HUGO 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 001527 FOREST LAKE AREA 1 400.00 400.00 .00 .00 001559 FRANCIS, LINDA 1 37.25 37.25 .00 .00 001584 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 1 2,317.58 2,317.58 .00 .00 Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:14:14 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001680 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 1 358.40 358.40 .00 .00 001720 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. 1 98.32 98.32 .00 .00 001768 H & L MESABI, INC. 1 305.66 305.66 .00 .00 001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 49.99 49.99 .00 .00 001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 5.00 5.00 .00 .00 001977 I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC. 1 89.66 89.66 .00 .00 002025 J & E SMALL ENGINE & SPORT, INC. 1 292.24 292.24 .00 .00 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 121.62 121.62 .00 .00 002180 KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL 1 2,473.86 2,473.86 .00 .00 002290 LAW ENFORCEMENT NEWS, INC. 1 42.00 42.00 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 13.61 13.61 .00 .00 002332 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 1 695.00 695.00 .00 .00 002431 LINO LAKES TRANSMISSION, INC. 2 3,269.45 3,269.45 .00 .00 002508 MUNICIPAL CLERKS /FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 3 595.23 595.23 .00 .00 002552 MENARDS, INC. 1 5.75 5.75 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 104.32 104.32 .00 .00 002580 METROPOLITAN AREA 1 16.00 16.00 .00 .00 002590 MICKELSON, LESTER 1 82.57 82.57 .00 .00 002640 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 1 3,644.36 3,644.36 .00 .00 002700 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 1 222.90 222.90 .00 .00 002835 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 1 245.00 245.00 .00 .00 002998 MITY -LITE, INC. 1 1,173.88 1,173.88 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 1 834.00 834.00 .00 .00 003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 5 946.62 946.62 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 747.45 747.45 .00 .00 003194 NOL -TEC SYSTEMS, INC. 1 18,841.00 18,841.00 .00 .00 Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:14:17 CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 4 FM Entry - invoice Journal Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003250 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 1 5,266.33 5,266.33 .00 .00 003285 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 3 3,437.50 3,437.50 .00 .00 003293 EMERGENCY VEHICLE SUPPLY, LLC 1 1,623.45 1,623.45 .00 .00 003311 NORTH VALLEY, INC. 1 108,286.59 108,286.59 .00 .00 003453 P.S.E. LIGHTING DIVISION 1 2,897.55 2,897.55 .00 .00 003457 PAGENET OF MINNESOTA, INC. 1 22.86 22.86 .00 .00 003492 PETTY CASH 1 255.58 255.58 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY WORKS 1 152.88 152.88 .00 .00 003625 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP 1 397.87 397.87 .00 .00 003816 RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC. 1 5,854.00 5,854.00 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 5 725.00 725.00 .00 .00 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 227.89 227.89 .00 .00 004040 SMITH, PEG 1 27.73 27.73 .00 .00 004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 2 253.43 253.43 .00 .00 004130 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, INC. 1 23.40 23.40 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,327.20 1,327.20 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 2,209.19 2,209.19 .00 .00 004350 T.K.D.A. 5 35,851.29 35,851.29 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 2 280.00 280.00 .00 .00 004456 TODORA, GAIL 1 640.00 640.00 .00 .00 004485 TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS INC. 1 25.01 25.01 .00 .00 004530 TURF SUPPLIES, INC. 2 2,772.05 2,772.05 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 3,621.02 3,621.02 .00 .00 004667 VERMEER OF MINNESOTA 1 286.18 286.18 .00 .00 004670 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1 340.70 340.70 .00 .00 004709 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 2 523.00 523.00 .00 .00 004720 VIGER, JEAN 1 89.28 89.28 .00 .00 Date: 08/22/2000 Time: 10:14:21 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 5 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004730 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 2 227.34 227.34 .00 .00 004800 WESSEL, BRIAN 1 468.16 468.16 .00 .00 004850 WYLAND, CATHY 1 780.00 780.00 .00 .00 005016 PROGRESSIVE ENGINEERING 1 4,034.00 4,034.00 .00 .00 005017 LINO LAKES BUSINESS CENTER /I 1 12,567.00 12,567.00 .00 .00 005019 NORTHERN WHOLESALE, INC. 1 36,087.00 36,087.00 .00 .00 005020 NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT,LLC 1 15,492.00 15,492.00 .00 .00 005029 NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA 1 7,611.36 7,611.36 .00 .00 006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 8.00 8.00 .00 .00 900219 TAYLOR CORPORATION 1 38,489.00 38,489.00 .00 .00 900305 HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. 1 72.00 72.00 .00 .00 900364 BRINTZ, BILL 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 900415 CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRUCTION 1 934.83 934.83 .00 .00 900436 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 900560 CAREERTRACK 1 89.00 89.00 .00 .00 900569 COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF WILLOW PONDS 1 18,340.00 18,340.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 145 434,584.48 434,584.48 .00 .00* STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1C Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk August 28, 2000 Consider Block Party Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) A block party is planned at 7010 Caribou Circle a cul -de -sac on Saturday, September 9, 2000 beginning at 5:00 p.m., and ending at 10:00 p.m. The attached map shows the location of the party. Also, find a list that shows the property owners who have signed the petition acknowledging they were notified about the party. The Police Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department have been informed about the party. The Fire Department may visit the block party. The Public Works Department doesn't have any concerns or problems. The Police Department supports the party for the opportunity to create community and to create a setting to form a neighborhood crime unit. In the past, the City Council has approved this applicant for a block party at this location. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the block party application 2. Deny the block party application 3. Return to staff for further research RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends option no. 1 DATE BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION CITY OF LINO LAKES The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as a request to hold a block party on the public right -of -way. NAME OF APPLICANT : 1-R‘C,IC( A\\tv ADDRESS : 7 0 ( a (10 ' 0,,4,.,. Ll (C,. '� U r\3 i_c( K S Ai p °mod l �j 'j �/ ti HOME TELEPHONE NO. : (�� 1 - 1 J C) 117 WORK TELEPHONE NO. : LOCATION OF BLOCK PARTY (Street name & location, intersection to intersection) PURPOSE OF PARTY : G T 5 L T L e/ u 14\ CJ \(\ ,t ( f\ �� ���++-� CS DATE AND HOURS OF PARTY: 1 °J1 — C O ' IL) p d (Not to exceed 10:00 P.M.) IT IS HEREBY AGREED: The applicants agree to abide by all rules set forth below, together with all ordinances and regulations which may be imposed governing such activities. 1. Petition. All residents living on the street or block in which the activity is planned, must sign on the last page of this application indicating they consent or do not object to the block party. 2. Barricades. Applicants shall be responsible for placement, maintenance and removal of barricades to be provided by the City in proper locations, such barricades to be left by the City on one corner of the block. Barricades shall be placed at either end of the street in which the block party is to take place. PAGE -1- NAME PETITION (Residents Consenting) ADDRESS 76 0 7' a Tht 7037 (70/:(0LA. etc-- , l3 si7d -704 coo ()i) C_:ivc, 1/19)'-e_e : t/ O 1(1) 6(rc (- TELE. NO. 10-1( Lt's I 7 - 7/29 ✓ � Y 7 F6 q 1 3 7 —057✓ l go - V Name of Organization (If applicable) Checked by: Police Department Public Works Department - — — — —59;28 OJi woe — — (20W— —000, 200(£. -z_ 'COS" yr '•t:,.$ .43- -4,4 I ,zS s;6C) //a ON \t; Vj tio N 0 .7„ /5/ //o (2N 1 jc7 .sei I /0SC1 I N' 0 ::::c.• N oZ c\; 00 cci 1 /QS(/ 1-ks I 1 (0 ..••: /9 5(/ 1.0 /9, //a On/ I /0Se /0SC/ •• • : : • to /c751-/ CO // OW /0 1 0.; n-4 /0 "SC/ 0) 3„ /5, //, ON o se/ csi 1 /0.0E1. /4,014' ts1 • /4,014' t " • " • 91'6fril 0 ./5 /4 0/1/ /92a/ /5; /4 0/Y —0009-- o •zt- lai —5Z ZR •• : : •••: •..• . •... • _i....c.3....: 0: 1 0e.. r....Cil y• f•- / ,0- o ' - . o c.r i es- it...4 —........../....0.. Xe-/— 0 w : 0 a) v;.., c\j kr; --; N cc; ,. Z : . i 0 0 I 02 en I I 1 1 A•1/Sii/e/ 0/ 129 1 =4j I 3„/5,//,0A/ 1 I--t<, ZILI /0c'SCi \i < ! CO o '• 0- N 0 co N cn. co. co _J 1 i 7„/.r of I <-9 90c I Ls /1,4 n /5 //,, V.9 13 1 tz, ,3 \ c ;t;:::‘,. og /0SC/ CO I A75(7 . ?cc, 1`A1 lc() ,,/ s „,.o. ,o ,sO• ) •o -e-,-,.. , 0. — ,i 2.. 5 <t: 00 t) 1 00 , (.0 N 7./5; No ON /0'SC/ (0 T. I j„rs;ricoN L. o se/ .1 1r) 0 _J ot• c o r-4Q9 —"1"— 54sm xi; 5471 to •S's ••"..., cs,\ ° lft er, " • .54'(19).,,L z Ix c, tA :C° 1 .1 , 1Y to aro,— — -.'" 11.1„ Lc, //o0S (20'2Z( 0;90 noetuvo-) ‘9:Act• -,SZ.e.C, \ 3.10.00' Qe — -00 SO/ of --0C250/ -- / L we— N- r) I- -- /h88 — •.9t Mt — (\I c'n /L Ioi dO11NVI I ‘.9 -77 I , nrt ' C 9 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: Consider Block Party VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: A block party is planned at 6345 Red Hawk Trail, a cul -de -sac on Friday, September 8, 2000 beginning at 5:00 p.m., and ending at 10:00 p.m. The attached map shows the location of the party. Also, find a list that shows the property owners who have signed the petition acknowledging they were notified about the party. The Police Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department have been informed about the party. The Fire Department may visit the block party. The Public Works Department doesn't have any concerns or problems. The Police Department supports the party for the opportunity to create community and to create a setting to form a neighborhood crime unit. In the past, the City Council has approved this applicant for a block party at this location. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the block party application 2. Deny the block party application 3. Return to staff for further research RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends option no. 1 AUG -09 -2000 09:86 CITY OF LINO LAKES DATE DUNK-2-MIMUE/1 CATIOLi CITY o? LINO LAKES 651 982 2499 P.02/04 The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as a request to hold a block party on the public right- of -way. MJe/e NAME OF APPLICANT : ADDRESS • HOME TELEPHONE NO. : y4� 6.37 ._ y fff, 7Q____-__ WORK TELEPHONE NO. LOCATION OF BLOCK PARTY (Street name & location, intersection to intersection) PURPOSE OF PARTY DATE AND HOURS OF PARTY: _''>' (Not to exceed 10 :00 P.M.) IT IS HEREBY AGREED: The applicants agree to abide by all rules set forth below, together with all ordinances and regulations which may be imposed governing such activities. 1. Petition. All residents living on the street or block in which the activity is planned, must sign on the last page of this application indicating they consent or do not object to the block party. 2. Barrigadea. Applicants shall be responsible for placement, maintenance and removal of barricades to be provided by the City in proper locations, such barricades to be left by the City on one corner of the block. Barricades shall be placed at either end of the street in which the block party is to take place. PAGE -1- AUG -09 -2000 09;06 NAME CITY OF LINO LAKES PETITION 6eidea s a sentin MRS 651 982 2499 P.03/04 Name of Organization (If applicable) Checked by: police Department Public Works Department • 170.34 \\�_1 L - '119.55 O - 6, EA ?33.00 WEST XCEPTION ,p0 R =294. o I c► m 0 / ° / o° *1 96.90 Zo.59� L= N p- 6'57 28 SEE DETAIL A ; ► (LOWER RIGHT) /11. _ EAST 233.00 w moo gig: , E- n E- N w w o�c 3 u Z J2 0 uJ o EXCEPTION An S 89 40'48 "E J 1 135.00 °ryh O loo 0° r \ S 89'40.48 "E 135.06 -1 3 G1 of • L S 89'40.48 "E J 135.07 O OI Ol 60 J_ 60 0 60 Nt O e � I� N I`1I l M l') O I g zI D =1O O7 11 [45.56 L -55.271 / 45.5 0 233.00 - -1 200.00 It in N 89'28'03 "W 000 Z•io EXCEPTION o 0 ► 8928'03 "E 7 200.00 -- IOC lo co L 0 W 135.07 .09 .3 v - 163.00 Ito 29.1 - a - 'a ��•'' _ 135,30 v� 110; • 0 �T N 89'05'36 "E �'� �' s,0 /�% 5 - 163.02 -- .:-.../4-r.14173:7\ a.' ifs `k� 0 1, ^ / of 1 I'. -7 J 60 /ki /h O hO /mac 1 L S 8915'17 "E v./ 0 • 15 I 11 1" e"') /�s7s /\ 1 / / / / DRAINAGE EASEMENT 406.54 vs) DRAINAGE EASEMENT 142.87 $-7 i I0 2f O Nh C589_27'33 "E o-s 8 .69 0 I O 1135.00 j 3 EASEMENT a) co o L , - r 135.00 4- o1 0 10 0 W I� 'r L S 8927_33 "E J o r- 135.00 -� Zlo 0l 1° of L S 89'27'33 "E J 60 0 0 135.00 . 5 60 1000 6 * I - pg o o0 137.48 a �� 54.68 'n L =15.18 8=218'05' a 61: AGENDA ITEM 7 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: Steve Krause, 8025 Wood Duck Trail, Variance VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority DESCRIPTION: Mr. Krause is requesting a variance to allow the construction of a 40' x 40' (1600 sq.ft.) detached garage in front of his home at 8025 Wood Duck Trail. The property is Zoned Rural and guided for low- density unsewered residential development in the draft Comprehensive Plan. According to the Zoning Ordinance, Mr. Krause is allowed a total of 3600 square feet of accessory building space on his 3.25 acres. Construction of this proposed structure will bring his total accessory building space to 2,384 square feet which is well within the requirements of the Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance also provides, in Section 3, Subd. 4. D. Accessory Buildings and Structures. 1.a. "No detached accessory structure shall be closer to the front lot line then the principal building or its attached garage." Thus the variance requested is to allow the accessory building in front of the principal building. Findings of Fact. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Mr. Krause has submitted a sketch indicating that he has a heavily wooded lot with a drainage ditch and wetland area in the north/west corner. He has limited space for this proposed structure as his drain field and septic tank occupy the south/east corner of his property. In review of the site Staff concurs that there is a hardship created by the lay of the land. A letter has been submitted by the adjoining property owner, to the north, indicating no objections to the location of the accessory structure in front of the home. For Council information, Wood Duck Trail was recently added to our State Aid roadway system. Although the proposed structure is located 40 feet from the front property line we may need an additional 10' of right -of -way for future road reconstruction. This is not anticipated in the near future but we would recommend that the proposed structure be moved 10' westerly to allow for this future reconstruction and maintenance of the required 40' setback at that time. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their September 9, 2000 meeting and recommended approval of this variance request with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are obtained prior to any construction. 2. The accessory building is located 50' from the current front property line on Wood Duck Trail. OPTIONS: 1. Approve variance requested with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 31 1 'Prat i 4OO7ON1I • ie1..31•i_. ■ 2212-:,:18111Z erants rwia.•rro.w.rmr O SO OOREET of 213. .. 3/ „..� 0. 213. e1• • • •O0oQ 1∎11 ii LAKE: VIEr I , e = 1/1111111fil ".'4111 13 s 112 SS OS MVO 3C 23 WW1, NORTH 3 4 5 3 6 LINO LAKES REHABILITATION CENTER 30 9 3I II II I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 ..1 7/26/00 1 c� " / ", , A ' /k adjoining neighbor Address l'Z) G-) r' h c.b (. (C/2 '-r72 , I i��y have no objections to the building of a garage in the proposed location on the property at 8025 Wood Duck Trail, Lino Lakes. r -G0.02 1 :g C0' Wes+ (inc. .r 63s ?- AI . +. .,.. ,....., ft. \ ‘,-.-...".---.--'-. • ' -.... • f(2' CO 1 REES .7..,. ,r,,,,:-..?-:..?".:71-._,..7:,-.',••••• •-,-.\k. .! /.. c "z •-.7- • • ‘1 *1■Pi.,.Y''''4.;j1 tiri•7'41$11 7 t • • r*:•c^,•• ........ ••• • .' f. - ' • ...r% c:G- 1-Rt..- V.i ... '.• ., pit ; rtri.;;Y•c: --z.',1 • . 'si...)1.. ';', ''.V: 4.- ' .. - • i; -• -1. r • , ' . , 4.11.4 • c SIE.0 I 10:Ii .t.. ,.. - i • .. -.• ,F....".r. ',....; ;...,--+. . , .........e,..4 • - tesprr,: • - - --scrim ;5•:a I -CI— 17-"-°t3P144.4.-4,6 a .,., ,,,9° .1--1•'-‘ :•• •;-/: 40. 44 a, ‘• , DRAM STOTION 1 ,„, (.. ..._......._) 0 .....,-..:.:„,-..0 , ; FELD .4.1, TRnit i.. . • !.... .!.._ •,...._._ L .0 13 R(04 of4occ 7 ' . - - - -- - - -:•-;N v.7.)‘ goti,4\e' • .•''''' • • • • rf . '...t - - ........_ • di' (t 40. i tn. 9.0.g6 64E F6X.. 1 , ... . n porg DgiINAGE . ,... . • .,:.. ,. . .. • •,,, ..:. ... . •-:.,,, • .,-, .....■••■11.1■•■••• • Et5 Gt1•7 5.77 • . Fet . • - • ■•••• Sicn . 7.)Ak4.1,IGEf ■•• ` • . Lie- ! - • - - ••••• TREES D • '4. 18 23 //,,C. 0 0 D DU TRAIL ■ 1.4 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 EPurvrnurs °Irrtifsrste HERB Drumm a •Denotes Wood Hub Set For Excavation Only Type of Building - Split Level Denotes Existing Elevation Note: Stakes set. at 60 feet from centerline of County Road 14 to agree with right of way stakes in place. ' • along line. CAK"' i 'h;)G o f soe.1 ¢25 • 389.9, VA4 • $o6E 04 j1r.• 1L / .ci • ,- . / 6 .0 J a `' ' • ;``. f �`' 4.0".-' i cam+ 30 .0 0 e'.4 'M ti) 111 tri Cs CS , � I • u'1 Lulu w N� U p coo nG I .. T � ict 11 a c1 • 1 i 1•S.41 W4! zza FPolrf of 6flRflGE i .� air�.l 40:•. •:t_ 0 30.01 . .3 w>a • Q • 113 .....;:l. • Lli� : ‹R °, itl 38,99 tai • rscad/me_ O /S.W) See. S COWVTY STATE..:. AID 1-661-1W -11) /Oa 14- O A • t c 4 5os.)3 V itz Itt 0 r--1 o < a- v. I pn FA V (Q •-.. ,t^ r) • (-6 IY 4O s2. The South 425.00 feet,as measured along the east and west lines, of the west 420.00 feet of the east 840.00 feet. as measured alone the north and south lines_ of the East Half of the AGENDA ITEM 7 B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland MEETLNG DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: Steve Benesch, 8251 Lake Drive, Minor Subdivision VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority DESCRIPTION: Steve Benesch is requesting a minor subdivision at 8251 Lake Drive that would add a 1,777 square foot triangle (24 x 144) to his existing parcel of property in order to correct an encroachment onto the neighbors property created when a garage slab was placed over the property line. The property owner at 8255 Lake Drive, Dave & Debbie Stoppelman, have agreed to sell this triangular parcel to Mr. Benesch. The Stoppelman parcel is a "flag lot" with a 50' x 255' strip of property leading to a larger, 166' x 308', parcel. Their total parcel is 2.35 acres in size. The driveway is located on the northerly side of the 50' strip of property. Mr. Benesch's parcel is .72 acres in size. The properties in question are currently Zoned Rural and guided for low density sewered residential development in the Draft Comp Plan. The two parcels under consideration were created prior to establishment of the10 acre minimum and are considered pre- existing non - conforming lots of record. The triangular piece to be split from one parcel and given to the other is insignificant in comparison to the overall rural lot minimum requirements. The adjoining property owners have agreed to sell the triangular piece of property to Mr. Benesch. It does not appear that the existing driveway to the Stoppelman home will be adversely affected by the location of the garage and Mr. Benesch has limited space for relocation of the slab. The proposed garage and slab will meet all setback requirements with approval of this subdivision, as the structure will be 5' from the side property line and more than 40' from the front property line. Mr. Benesch was unaware of the building permit requirements when he poured his slab which created the encroachment and necessitated the subdivision. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this request at their August 9, 2000 meeting and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are issued prior to any additional construction. 2. The minor subdivision shall be recorded with Anoka County prior to issuance of any building permits. 3. Additional right -of -way shall be deeded to Anoka County for the future reconstruction of Lake Drive if required by the County. This additional right - of -way shall be dedicated from Mr.Benesch's property prior to issuance of any building permits. 4. No park dedication shall be required with this minor subdivision. OPTIONS: 1. Approve minor subdivision with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 ,l \i i I C: 3; -20 m:950640 al, i loNS1.m 4- /9 601/M7-7-111, -R.6 OF PL4F II --PO WA V • • 910 — Rt17 -PL., AK*. 25-- X3.11,' .. 2 £war s' z AKE': Z! r 6 5 • NORTH I 6 sa 117 LAKES 1 CENTER 24 75 GEORGE WATCH LAKE N D!, SU8. NO R.L.• S x,18 ►AARCHAi LAKE July 8 2000 This is a letter confirming that Dave & Debbie Stoppelman, the property owners of 8255 Lake Drive, agree to sell to Steve and Sue Benesch of 8251 Lake Drive, the minimum amount of land so building codes can be met to construct a garage. David G. Stoppelman Debra K. Stoppelman .cam K. ;6- p.Na 2-t wx.ct,,.-.' //iv 6t.) Lot L. ; �, E NEEDED F QY i\) .(�N Rck . BSI v • W ,,,k..".Thi io C:Lbl co I q 1 09. «OZ•ti1c•LO N WI if/ o `tO ro CO M p0 I z1 ivisivel- 3.00is1c N AGENDA ITEM 7C STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: CSAH 49 Update VOTE REQUIRED: No action required BACKGROUND: On August 16, 2000, the City Council held a special Work Session to discuss the proposed reconstruction of Hodgson Road from County Road J to Lake Drive. Based on the City Council's discussion, staff has attempted to prepare a list of key issues to be addressed by Anoka County as follows: 1. Can the roadway section be limited to a width of 52 feet? 62 feet? 2. Can the number of lanes be phased in over time? 3. Can the speed limit be reduced to 45 mph? 4. How will the roadway transition occur from Anoka to Ramsey County at County Road J? Will signals be installed? 5. Is limiting the right -of -way to 100 feet in width feasible? 6. Other issues? I have also verified that a "hotline" can be setup with a message to provide the latest information to interested parties. The idea of a Task Force is to be discussed in more detail by the City Council at the August 23 Work Session. AGENDA ITEM 7D STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: Apollo Business Center, Conditional Use Permit VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: G.M. Development (Gary Uhde) is developing an area known as the Apollo Business Center located east of Jon Avenue, between the 74th Street alignment and I -35W. Maps showing this area are attached. Within this area; the Blue Heron and Contract Hardware sites have been developed, the H & L Mesabi site plan has been approved for development, and the Twin City Fab (parcel D) and Marmon /Keystone (parcel E) sites have submitted site plans for review. Trunk sanitary sewer and water provided service to this area of the City about 10 years ago as part of the West Central Trunk project. Construction of Apollo Drive through this site took place in 1993 and 1994. Apollo Drive is an Anoka County roadway (CSAH 12) and was constructed through a Joint Powers Agreement between the City and Anoka County. It was designed to comply with County and State Aid design standards. To accommodate proper design of the storm sewer system, the roadway had to be raised above the surrounding elevations. In order to provide fill to be sold to the Apollo Drive contractor, borrow pits were created in the Apollo Business Center. It was expected these pits would later be utilized as storm water pond sites. In order to modify the location and depth of the excavations, and to provide fill for the proposed building sites on parcels D and E, the developer expects to move in excess of 80,000 cubic yards of material. Section 12.B of the City's Zoning Ordinance states "When five thousand (5,000) or more cubic yards of material is to be removed or deposited on any lot or parcel, a conditional use permit shall be required ". Based on ownership of five parcels, the applicant is able to move 25,000 cubic yards of material without a CUP. However, in order to allow the site grading to continue, a CUP must be obtained. The proposed plan is consistent with the site plans that have been submitted for Twin City Fab and Marmon /Keystone. The CUP grading plan does not include detailed landscaping information which has, or will be, provided with the site plan applications for the individual sites. The proposed grading plan includes fill, excavation, storm sewer construction, and wetland alteration. Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is the LGU in this part of the City and has the responsibility for reviewing the proposed wetland alterations. The RCWD has reviewed the proposed grading and wetland alteration and authorized permit issuance upon completion of two items. City staff expects these conditions will be satisfied by the applicant. The Environmental Board minutes from May 31, 2000, are also attached for your review. We recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions: 1. A rock or wood chip construction entrance must be included for erosion control. 2. The permit must the acquired from the Rice Creek Watershed District. 3. Any grading activity, including any hauling of materials, is restricted to the City's allowed working hours as follows: Monday- Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sundays /Holidays No working hours allowed 4. Provide a schedule, including completion dates, for proposed grading. Interim completion dates can be used for future development sites. 5. A Letter of Credit will be required running to the City equal to 150% of the construction cost. 6. An escrow deposit to reimburse the City for the cost of periodic site visits would be required. 7. Any work in the right -of -way requires approval from Anoka County. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit for Grading with the conditions noted. 2. Approve the Conditional Use Permit with the conditions noted and other conditions. 3. Deny the Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 Jam- - II1IM444- 1 11- AIAAi40/W4 IW MINANA A! - -ice•- IMF M I IttarziAT.44.,,,,,,,mulal,„, DV. IiI2ia mulr`silliiiiiiiiiil sR '.!! ! OftIVE-1111� Unigitili ,,.,�,7,i�. . i�000��00 p ° "000 `� d�l�� 7E, Fli 1��o�o�f1�v0000000��oo,,0000 � =ov ���a,,�, . , ., • ood�ao ©oao�• °Rao -- � ■ N� LWO .;" AM PARK NORTH �� t I 0 I�00 tJl & r73>Ili� Ia.. 11,1i11,1111.___ ®-T0 �oo10000� oi �eq m SP' I h �III� Num o GEN rnR e,�+ oQQ�d Cr �•r.,r �a�� � E, MEI o60��dDbac� #: I n FANM, 11iih'. I'! REIM elMa v RUE 0 %-ft:u ���" Ai � �a 0 Q�n� ✓,nl lkl� 'll�u o,■ !.� °�a 11000 0 ovd so Es m °v Em I.® of � L IvdI El Ellin Yi la �{Illnl�; p .i YY1YY94X�111 LINO LAKES REHABIUTATION CENTER GEI 11 iGOMM aim Om om i 0•s 0•S O�Om /MIMI om INEINIEN Om MIMI NM= EMI* Qum slimes arms MINX ° m WINO Qlgi �© 00 MIN• NEM am IIIIm NMI IMO ::■sue MIES aMI oMI MINI �� MUM ee o■s MUM mg= NMI ae a•s om OM= oINIEIoo MORE NeirraC 111!�lumi!ll cm a rA ,WE ,n f vNH u fl TA MUM mu aa� : °nnQii =a earn _� it aajcr� r zsdICEREI RE v. lLS zO !a Er, te riMENEIJEMIEM 2E1 IMMILVILOU all iii „ rASSIM allalgraCIENT Flpoatd^ 4te, n ►.� QQQLO.�I.i�I ' S3>IV1 ON I 1 VIOSBNNIW H m '8189 AWEWE VFNIt 09 89 FL .4 s4s cn m - -■ o m o co z c u) 23 m 0 (f) (f) n — m z ZG) m —0 z 23 r- P.- c_ z (f) z z (f) c z r-- (I) z lif m rn r- m m (1 70 (A o z -c? r -4 n - 4 ,C) > > M Z c -0 m --A OD M 0 0 • C - Z > r CO 3> — 04 0 0 -48400.-444..mo- - ts) • 5' 2' I' • m H .s. 00.a82to Qt8T (/) — FP2 WA8'F2! ", . n (1) m q;.022W2E2i. ,0P 911 48g;im 0 M,T,m..mg.OgA 0 ......- 0-10 g°F.9,°8111:50Fx .1PTIMT.I'.02 .. rr-nmm--<mx D-IW,,,Z Z -M 414 .r- M- -IX 0<co O rg-Agt.!:;52,r2. _.. n W okEST-1-1NECIF..„ "EAST 383 FEE OF SOUTH F N rn a v 4 1IV130 30N33 11IS 91 n n r- 4 4 4 ( m■ ------ 70 r r AGENDA ITEM 7 E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: Site & Building Plan Review Conditional Use Permit Marmon Keystone, 265 Apollo Drive VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The application includes a site plan and conditional use permit. The business processes metal pipe and tubing. Some outdoor storage of pipe, tubing, and other material will be needed, which requires a conditional use permit. This review is based on the following plan submittals though the reduced plans attached here were received at a later date: Preliminary Site Plan 8/3/00 Preliminary Grading Plan 8/3/00 Lighting Plan 8/3/00 Preliminary Utility Plan 8/3/00 Preliminary Landscape Plan 8/3/00 Exterior Elevations rec'd 7/10/00 ANALYSIS The submittal complies with the LI Light Industrial zoning standards as follows: Required Proposed 8 acres Lot size minimum 1 acre Lot width minimum 100 ft 500+ ft Setbacks: buildings from street rear lot line side lot line parking from street rear lot line side lot line 50 ft 30 ft 10 ft 15 ft 5 ft 5 ft 50 ft 205 ft 110 ft 15 ft 470 ft 25 ft Bldg. height 45 ft 32 ft Green space 10% >10% Marmon Keystone August 28, 2000 page 2 • Building The footprint is approximately 83,050 sf. The main building is about 200' x 405', and the office area is 32' x 64'. The building will be 32' high except for the loading dock locations on the west and east sides, where the ground elevation will be lower by four feet. Precast concrete panels will form the exterior walls of the main building. The office portion will be rock -faced concrete block. The applicant states that trash will be stored within the building. The plans indicate a recycling bin. The recycling bin must be screened. • Lighting Light fixtures will be shoebox fixtures on the building walls and in the parking and drive areas. The submitted preliminary lighting plan showing site lighting intensity indicates that the project complies with the maximum of one foot candle at the street centerline. The shoebox fixtures will ensure lighting is directed downward and not up into the night sky. The lighting plan shows one fixture on the eastern end of the outdoor storage area. The CPTED review recommends an additional fixture to allow better surveillance by police. • Signage Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. • Landscaping Marmon Keystone and TC Fab to the east are coordinating their landscape plans. A new landscaping plan. The landscaping plan includes native and non - native plantings, plowing of compacted soils before seeding, and other elements in accordance with the environmental management plan. The Environmental Specialist's memo is attached. At the August 9 P & Z meeting, the applicant's representative expressed concern over prairie plantings in front of the building. They are comfortable with prairie on the back of the site, but would rather have a neater, more conventional landscaping appearance on the front of the new building along the street. The P & Z agreed with the applicant and recommends that the prairie plantings should not be required in front of the building. Staff is comfortable with this. • Utilities Sanitary sewer and water service exist on the north edge of the site. (The City vacated the 74th St. right of way on May 22 but retained a drainage and utility easement.) There Marmon Keystone August 28, 2000 page 3 also are utilities in Apollo Drive, but connections to sanitary sewer there would require tearing up the roadway. It is possible to connect tow ater without digging up the street. The new building will connect to water in Apollo Drive, subject to agreement from Anoka County. The building will connect to sanitary sewer in the 74t'' St. easement on the north. Stormwater management on this site includes a pond shared by the property on the east. This common pond will serve both sites. Grading on this site, the TC Fab site to the east, and the unsold property to the west is interrelated. Because of this, the design and review of these two sites requires coordination. The City Engineer's memo addresses these issues further. • Parking For light manufacturing, our code requires at least one parking space per 2000 sf of gross floor area or one space per employee, whichever is greater. The office area requires 3 spaces plus one space per 200 sf. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the gross building area. The total requirement is 48 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for 24 more if additional parking is needed. This totals 53. The applicant has stated that previous experience has shown that 29 will be enough. In the interest of reducing unnecessary impervious surface, the "proof of parking" approach is a good alternative. If parking becomes a problem, additional parking will be constructed. • Roads, Access, Circulation Passenger vehicles will use the parking on the east side of the building. A shared driveway provides access to the site on the east. The driveway will be shared by TC Fab and Marmon Keystone. A shared driveway agreement between the two sites will be necessary and staff is recommending that one be submitted for City review as a condition of approval. In reviewing shared driveways, we must consider potential traffic conflicts in the driveway itself. Vehicles leaving the sites come from two directions and mix in the driveway before exiting onto Apollo. The parking drive is 100+ feet back from Apollo Drive. This is adequate and will minimize conflicts. gross area 90% code requirement required spaces total footprint 19,200 sf office 2,048 sf 1843 3 plus one space per 200 sf 12 mfg/warehouse 81,000 sf 72,900 one space per 2000 sf 36 TOTAL 48 The total requirement is 48 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for 24 more if additional parking is needed. This totals 53. The applicant has stated that previous experience has shown that 29 will be enough. In the interest of reducing unnecessary impervious surface, the "proof of parking" approach is a good alternative. If parking becomes a problem, additional parking will be constructed. • Roads, Access, Circulation Passenger vehicles will use the parking on the east side of the building. A shared driveway provides access to the site on the east. The driveway will be shared by TC Fab and Marmon Keystone. A shared driveway agreement between the two sites will be necessary and staff is recommending that one be submitted for City review as a condition of approval. In reviewing shared driveways, we must consider potential traffic conflicts in the driveway itself. Vehicles leaving the sites come from two directions and mix in the driveway before exiting onto Apollo. The parking drive is 100+ feet back from Apollo Drive. This is adequate and will minimize conflicts. Marmon Keystone August 28, 2000 page 4 A public roadway segment is proposed on the west side of the site. This would be about 230 ft. of road with a cul de sac. This road provides for trucks to circulate around the site. In addition, the road will provide access to future parcels in the undeveloped area on the west of the Marmon Keystone site. This road will be constructed to City standards and will require a developer's agreement like other development projects involving public roads. This can be part of the agreement for tax increment financing. Both the shared driveway and the public roadway are consistent with the joint powers agreement with Anoka County that covers the number and type of accesses on Apollo Drive. • Park Dedication Park dedication will be subject to the City policy. For low -labor intensity businesses (one employee or fewer per 1000 sf ), the requirement is $133 per 1000 sf of commercial building. Marmon Keystone, with the potential for 11 employees in 83,050 sf, qualifies for this. Therefore, the park dedication would be $11,045. • Outdoor Storage Conditional Use Permit Outdoor storage is allowed as a conditional use in the LI zone per Ordinance 02 -00, adopted this past February. Two sets of findings must be made. Findings for All Conditional Use Permits: As stated in Sec. 2 Subd. 2.B.7., the Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it can make findings that the proposed use at the proposed location: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. b. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and/or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. e. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. f. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. Marmon Keystone August 28, 2000 page 5 g. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. h. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. i. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. Findings Specific to Outdoor Storage: In addition to those findings, Ordinance 02 -00 (amending Section 8, Subd. I.1) states that outdoor storage in the LI zone must meet the following criteria: a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring uses, residential zoning districts and public rights -of -way per Sec. 3, Subd. 4.S of the Zoning Ordinance. The storage area shall be screened 100% from residential properties. b. Storage area is fenced in a manner approved by the City. c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the City Council. d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.H. of this Ordinance or other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this Ordinance and not in front yards. f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, including land in a neighboring city. "Abutting" includes across a street. "Abutting" does not include properties that touch only corner -to- corner. g. The property shall not abut I -3 5 W or I -3 5E. h. The storage area shall not abut a school or a public park. i. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. j. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. The site complies with the locational restrictions. The storage area will be fenced with 8' chain link, and screened with ivy on the fence and other landscaping. The storage area will be class 5 aggregate rather than paved. Staff recommends this is appropriate. The ordinance would allow the storage area to be up to 3.5 x 83,050 sf, or 290,675 sf. The shown area is much smaller, approximately 20,000 sf. With the conditions recommended below, all necessary findings will apply to the project. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on June 28. That Board did not have a complete landscape plan to review. Nonetheless, it made several recommendations, which are attached to this report. A complete landscape plan was submitted and the Environmental Specialist has endorsed it (see attached memo). It includes native and Marmon Keystone August 28, 2000 page 6 non - native planting as well as treatment of compacted soils. We have reviewed a lighting plan. Coordination by neighboring properties for landscaping was accomplished. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Staff recommends the following conditions apply: 1. A shared driveway agreement for the access to Apollo Drive must be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and recorded with the County. 2. Approval of the site plan and conditional use permit is not an implied approval of signage. All signs require a sign permit and must comply with the sign ordinance. 3. Twenty -nine (29) parking stalls shall be constructed as shown on the site plan, with additional area available as shown as "future parking if required" on the site plan. If the City determines parking is a problem, the property owner shall construct additional parking. 4. The recycling bin shall be screened as shown in elevation of screening received August 4, 2000. 5. Shoebox lighting fixtures shall be used as shown in material received 8/4/00. An additional fixture shall be added to light the western portion of the storage area. 6. The paved truck maneuvering area shall have curb around the perimeter. 7. Outdoor storage racks shall not be railroad ties or creosote- treated or penta- treated wood. 8. The City Engineer's concerns, included in the TKDA memo of July 28, 2000, must be addressed to his satisfaction. 9. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to grading. 10. Final utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer. 11. Park dedication shall be paid per City policy. 12. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. Fire suppression sprinklers are required. Marmon Keystone August 28, 2000 page 7 13. Prairie plantings shall not be required in front of the building. All other elements of the landscaping plan shall apply. OPTIONS 1. Approve site plan and conditional use permit based on findings in this report and with the conditions of approval listed above. 2. Deny application for site plan and conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140 PHONE: 651/292 -4400 FAX: 651/292-0083 John Powell Reference: Marmon Keystone Copies To: From: Jason Wedel ` i( Date: July 28, 2000 Site Review Lino Lakes, Minnesota Commission No. 11985 -002 After reviewing the submitted plans for the above referenced project, we have the following comments: 1) The area in the rear of the building that gets curb and gutter is not consistent with the Apollo Business Center plan. The high water elevation and the emergency overflow elevation shown on the detail for pond 3 does not match the elevations shown on the detail in the Apollo Business Center grading plan. 3) The notes state that all storm sewer will be class 5. This is not necessary for pipe sizes 18" or greater. 4) The spot elevations need to be turned off on the grading plan. 5) Flow arrows must be shown on all pipe segments. 6) The existing 30" RCP on the grading plan misspells "By Others ". 7) A construction entrance location and detail need to be included in the plans. 8) The City details are only referenced in the notes. The actual details need to be included in the plans. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to give me a call. An Equal Opportunity Employer Memorandum To: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: 08/01/00 Re: Landscape Plans For Twin City Fab and Marmon Keystone The Landscape Plans for Twin City Fab and Marmon Keystone were designed in response to the Recommendations of the Environmental Board. The designs submitted reflect the concerns of the Environmental Board. These concerns include the use of native grasses and forbs as surface water buffers and the integration/and the restoration of natural systems that once thrived here. The design of Twin City Fab extended the landscape design ideas presented in H & L Messabi. The landscape designs of Twin City Fab and Marmon Keystone have been tied together in common materials and theme. From this perspective, the Landscape Designs of Twin City Fab and Marmon Keystone are appropriate. 6frfilirdo#frwm forl doow-d Memorandum To: Brian Wessel CC: Mary Kay Wyland, Jeff Smyser, John Powell, Mary Alice Divine From: Marty Asleson Date: 06/29/00 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations /Apollo Business District The following recommendations were made at the June 28 Environmental Board Meeting: Marmon Keystone slum') • All recommendations in staff report. Note item 3 conceming treated wood. This item was discussed and defined to mean creosote or penta- treated wood. • That the Environmental Board see a finished and complete landscape plan and have opportunity to make comment by telephone or email. • That the developer provide a landscape maintenance contract for native areas for a five -year period. • That a lighting plan be submitted with the landscape plan. • That the developer should work with 265 Apollo on a coordinated landscape plan and installation. • That future storage are 1st stage be relocated to 2nd stage area, and that the second stage area be planted with a vegetated buffer until the time ever comes that a second stage storage area be needed. Twin City Fab, Inc. Same as above except item 3 should say move the proposed future storage area to the East instead of West. 1 --.N 1//1-FotH'JPN,40/ 4b:lIJ Utz AGENDA ITEM STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: June 28, 2000 TOPIC: Marmon Keystone Site /Apollo Meadows BACKGROUND: Attached is a TIF Application and Site Plans for Marmon Keystone to construct a business building at 265 Apollo Drive. At the May Environmental Board Meeting, the Environmental Board reviewed and made recommendations on the over all site grading, and global landscape issues. The site for Marmon Keystone shows a building, parking lot, on -site water storage, and a proposed future storage area. The proposed storage area is not needed at this time, and the storage area is being shown for possible future needs. A landscape plan has not been submitted in time for the packet. I have included the infiltration checklist and calculations for infiltration rates. Water from the building appears to be directed to depressional areas and pond 3. Water from the parking lot appears to be directed to depressional area on the East Side of the building. OPTIONS: 1. Provide a more detailed landscape plan, providing for plant materials appropriate to the site for both native and non - native landscape areas. All non - native area should show irrigation. 2. Provide for a site soils management and reconstruction plan. This plan should include measures to reconstruct landscape soils to an un- compacted state after construction. This plan should also show soil organic amendment incorporated into any sub -soil reconstruction process. 3. Move the proposed future storage area to the West and provide a buffer planting between the storage area and pond 3. Eliminate treated wood to stockpile materials on. RECOMMENDATION: All of the above and any recommendations from the Environmental Board. OPIN rd wAtir mom ,JI laitwAm Of Ptr5F 0614I0f0-01 - -50050-7--14011!---0161100,•71,•■•--POIr NO 50 6.5 -00001-11--501,1,-019 MINMIN rim Fingummunamaug golrfiro siaTir m• Pliolid mill IN IR litileggnile al It t -------9-00Inikkim Ann. imr immonmpilt nu fi RR lallmakiamo ne. wow . ilanlanaPtEllfflAlli ra Ig. Amy ABIMIV M* * I * m yr . __a AI- r m s U 8 it IN At amiNNIIIII. ---- -------- , ----- ELENIENTY SCHOOL ...... - • - Pat AUD. NORTH 134 5 /111:11.W.■ a 1 G 1717. T 111 4 51.111111 MARSHAN LAKE • 10 la 4 22 j• 4 r e • _ ...._„„.8.6H ....htS • ; CENTURY 1 ....tr.< t ,3 3133 ,,, 7,.• , 1 3,-. 33 :33;- ;--1-H 4/. \ I 3 25 333I 23 I, 3:333:x A 1 -32.3 LI A . . H . '"-V ?A, .. :: -., , -, . 4i 't. ,r. ,i• ' .r •' ,'L, ' " r'':'--.;... ",• .. , 4: :. `lN .3. ," :,, ••,I• " -f. ; .. - . / 1 .:..6. - N 4 . , :,,'"'\ i .,,/. ' .._" 1_- Y /..\..',. :'':, ,.'.,.s ' .•: ,-t * -• -= , .?.' —.• -t - .7,; -,• 1,t, .... ', -6 -_._ 7.T, '.;'; '1 FARM 4 IFA RM1, • -: .— / '• / 1 5 ' 1 ; ,. FA . l' \I ' :-iik CLA a Ti --- - 1 - _ • - , ---. 1 ` 11::.,•...„: 1.,:;• r..--',. . 4-il "--t.-.4cr-:;1-2-.-1 i•--'. 't 4 -----• -.-.- .-=.°4::.r, `-'-`7 '-'-::--_.-. - ----Awarlop. '7,4M1.-411.11 I I I .• . 6 i. 5 - I • 4, -4- - p . . • • ..csomisum";' 1. 5 0m1O4 • 2N7 1 ;' > . .LFU w O p1 P o L.mA o K E'— O - S • ' /4Y • ,.//R 3 R-2 UD suaLt1 •tr: • - --i 1 • t b ; t • „.; . ! 7 „_" K E 7 - 1"!; . - 77.1 ! 2 " J 1"4- • A , RICE LA g — A 3 17 ; I t 7771 . 411•B •ffillW 1A7a iAtRa7K; 7 NG r7 . I .4:k ' 4 D7- : _s t -•-_ , ._-: .' . • ,_- -_-1--.c". ..u..o .71. .r4 , ;p. p.• S_- _8 p a4_:•• Z i,2 .i-. . r - ' . ' 'A;.I• = 4S T-E. 161: 1 4 -t - -- -• i a- -1 , . 1 . • _ _ ' „ . - --- ,= -1 1t 7i : 1 — , . .-—: 1 1 - - • • ". —1 T4Skrinall --4AK ;._ •.- . - 1- b - . of R S 11 - 1-1..- - -7Se1 1 t1. • , I z ; – Ga '• ' 4r 2 t Ls _ ' 7 7 ; 1— -••••• 1 • ■: j .`01. •.n`V ;17! , •• • , • • 3 CAg —3 Zoof.i/a‘ dor,- RIS E.:- ' ..a.--al...,...-...4-•-•--c -■-■11.--, - ..-...:...4 i ' , .: ! ''.---7-7---t mc_E_____..t - , • , t ,•'tlEit.-"-- • t t -, Qt.. tr---<.3 . , _______ 2 !'''''.--.--. :.2...t.,1 LI - - : '. -1- 1 ARMS— 2ND Aii.....Cii .' ...3.:' --1.------' ! . . . • 5. I .5 ! PROADOC.. • !1'..--; ',...'!".',2i'2! ' ' i : .' .. ' ' - Ilk Jr` = ''''".,1•1 ',..M.,.. - __.— ; • — • • ' ' '7---- ' ADD1 V ; -; I , 1 •'' '''ZI r_....,,_, t , ..„..F.,—_,.....,,,, „. ; I , .• . . • .• , . : : a -> ■_.-.:,....._ ,,, _ , „, . _ or_._, ; ; ,,':•':".,42, .• `-'0 1 , , 7_777.. , ,...... 0O_ . . ., :------- 22---,2 -3.-.33: IAEAsia—‘3,,sre ' ; :,.r.. ...I ; - -,.- . : '•••••, ••'_ ..: ::.:, "..r.." .. , .3t-.... ,...7„ , 1,, .... . - I A 1▪ ar ., ■•-•;----.. 1 R-1 r- -■ 01,f.t724.. ea-St Tdrefr , 7.70rf r.r! „ AUC" 0 3 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES 11IM V38V H1IM 030VanS 38 a3A0 S SSV10 .9 03a01S 38 01 N301S 3did -0 GC -< 17 0 M 0 >70 -t — Z 0 0 '3 cn 33. 0 m -4 9.• 0 o z m -111 rn (Az -(3 MO -n — 0 0 co n • 0 745 1> • ZZ > z M - -4 0 - 0 CO c m 0 03 73 W 0 > co .0 ......... , ... 14�.� I I I I Li [- qt. -„, 450.00 r-- KZ- 0 , ()N/ CD s• 87 89310 00"-----.411111 893.31 24"CMP 2277.92 N 88°22'57' E r 77— MV rn- / 290.60 3 254' 75 •3 i--.3,01t ACRES L FLR 900.4 i _ 1 FFLR 900.4 1107,1 0 47 73 o • L _J • 2 q`D'Ke) z t=; <a. \I\ ....."- ...../ ,.../ ZA ,.....- ,./.- aca. „,---- ,----` „.. ,---". „,../ .../- Je -00- 0303 D0r C- 0-1-0 --I 250(51 1-131 -00 0 0003-,1>ZA, 0,1700M • (/5 0C -MI > rs) no ff‘J0• n 0 , 0 0 -7> c m • r->moaconc n m M30 O 63 IC - MONS-03- U n ON • 0 • cs) c 0. • 0 - rn o • co -n co 11. -n to 13.• X m 0 H 0 20 40 80 Graphics Scale lin feet) ...ff."- ----- ,/ „---- / --•-- -- - , , AP IS COMPOSITE OF FIELD TOPO DATA. CITY IMPROVEMENT PLANS. & — __ ../- ..„---- BOUNDARY SURVEY .--- 5 8/03/00 REV PER CITY COMMENTS JCJ 4 7/25/00 REV PONDING EASEMENTS JCJ 3 7/21/00 REV PER CITY COMMENTS JCJ 2 6/27/00 ADD CURB A GUTTER JCJ 1 6/27/00 REV OUTDOOR STORAGE JCJ NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET I 5 DATE: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN MARMON KEYSTONE S I TE L I NO LAKES . M I NNESOTA ■41"perbelpontY nhfc,Tusgel7nree'crs;:isrsTarn'd that I an es.dulyy registered Prof essiond Engine. under the lo of I he State of es°, j C AfJ J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS, INC. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN 8618 Maryland Ave. N. Brooklyn Pork. MN 55445 Phone: (763) 391-0243 FAX: (763) 391-0245 6/23/00 PRO.ECT NO.: 20000501 CADD FILE: Reg I 1 54 Dale fki_5(2.3Y.L'. T•rr.irr � II 1199.0 -. -\ -- 893.10 /r_. —_ —_ 893.31 24 "Cl 899.0 FES *7 INV 893.6 LOWER 12' WATERMAIN UNDER o' ��36' RCP WITH MIN. 2' CLEARANCE D•S.M - m _ =4o N T 897.4 NV- 843.8 -' TNf INV 890.28 (S) OUTLET CONTROL �� /IiI�III /i FES +5 - I-NV`890.38 3� LF RCP e 01732X RCP -- _,x_900 Mil - -- 902 -- - -- • i / / I / / / er -= JQ/ -7 ewa� VI • / ; 90 9 / /// //t // \ ' POND 1111t11�1\I, \\\ %. /_ \ \\ \ c\ r\ ' / ` \ `0 ■ {,oco %,,, \ \\\. \Ir \\,\ \\ \`\` __ /. ;/ iiii' ' +'` 114 I,I1\, \ \ \\ \' - -.7 -= / / // /iiii/ ,111111t \ . \\\ . -- i // / /// / i�.,, / �// / I • 2B V D Ot ()USA W 0 0 z m rD rer zc-v->00t> rrr- Im0PT -4o >0K ti- A O N =mm Z E N z r- o m z m N -Din T T M~ O m m N m D> f O C 7 ZNDO '1z- OP-1l) y 0 0 0 s 0 r f m- 04> r r o>mm - -c--10 r-imr r-i yz 2000 00 —GZl ms v> ON yf m D 0¢ v D D -7i E ti N r cmr?'01 '.T O tmi+000OD — U-DCD m 04-007010* msn o r*caror *A 0 -i m 0 T m 0 H y m 0 S 00 0 a $mr m *001(0 o I H r 0 0 -4o D Z m °o 0145 F I D r 7 -7402 D T J o 04 Z ▪ a o Z m — z m gy. z 0 m (n AP IS COMPOSITE OF FIELD TOPO DATA. CITY IMPROVEMENT PLANS. & BOUNDARY SURVEY 11V130 33N33 11S (/) m o — m zr-d (/) —1 r i Z z m z C m n Z 0 OD — m O O C Z Zz r > — (1 4 t 444 0 O 4 9 5 e 3 2 8/03/00 7/21/00 6/26/00 6/23/00 6/15/00 REV PER CITY COMMENTS REV PER CITY COMMENTS REV PER RCRD COMMENTS ADDED PARKING 6 STORAGE ADDEO RCM REOUIREMENTS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION JCJ JCJ JCJ JCJ JCJ BY /SHEET 2 5 DATE: 6/12/00 PROJECT NO 20000sa CARD FLE: PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN MARMON KEYSTONE SITE LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA I hereby certify thin this ploo, paaf,canon or, n s preo o by o• or ,d 9direct Engineer Under nd that 1 duly registered Protes_donal Engineer under the laves f the State o(/Ry nesota. Reg Dote \J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS, INC. C' SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN 8618 Maryland Ave. N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 \ \� // Phone: (763) 391 -0243 FAX: (763) 391 -0245 MH *30 TG 899.9 INV 887.79 241 LF 8" PVC • 0.4--% D -0DnDn rmrrrr rmrrrr -nr M *0 rn Nm-ZD0 oxmD o :m - m N OmC-4 xrrs amm>mm 1 11 Zf� ND rich x zmmm DN0Z f <-1 Dorn rn>01- X0 s0-4 rrn nfIcorx Omxm D 0003 col- -1 DCSmr wmznr m -1•- rm 2-2-001 2. z- rho Or 1AUt«a0 MN) Z. o ry w r- out - CO -o m m- a m v ■ z 0 m 0 co A 0 89310 ®` --"1111 893.31 24 "CMP 12" WATERMAIN �.a ee6.25 10" SAN SEWER 450.00 TG 899.1 •' INV 896.04 0 CB *14 rit. 276 LF 18" RCP 00.48% TGI899.7 IN 896.44 CB •1 an CB * I I TG 898.3 IN 894.72 E FFLR 900.4 Iy A-54,1-25' Z 140.00 75. 0 -4 to FE IN *17 897.'6 -4 z NV FFLR 900.4 POND 3 °F 7Ntse 70 99 ri h I FFLR 900.4 41)111- 8- WATERMAIN CO r0 *12 TG 898.2 NV 894.8 -o tn FES *7 INV 893.6 LOWER 12' WATERMAIN UNDER f 36iRCP TO PROVIDE 2.MIN. CLEARANCE 0. 290.60 DMH *6 TG 897.4 INV 893.8 (N) INV 890.28 IS) OUTLET CONTROL FES *5 INV 890.38 32 LF RCP • 0.32% MH 0 FES *1 INV 89 .24 75 " 25' - I V 89 340 LF 6' PVC • 1.80% 7 0 m l o et 0 .O 1132' H*33 G 903.8 o INV 896.7 1 p5600' 9 12 EX GB ( s (5 eee .� \� cs q3. / �G3 * w . / C' X!lf�ll,, "" � 4 V .4\ 0 a. D 0 no nO A v FES 898,8 \N`I POND 2B POND 2A / i� /HEFT 4 5 J b A U G 0 3 2000 t ENO' LAKES IS COMPOSITE OF FIELD TOPO DATA. CITY IMPROVEMENT PLANS. & BOUNDARY SURVEY DATE: 6/23/00 PROJECT NO.: 20000501 CADD FA E: PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN MARMON KEYSTONE SITE LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan. specification or report that Ian ae duly registered Professional Engneeraunand the la the State of Miytisota. 1154 Dale _21_1/a. 0 20 40 80 Graphics Scale (in feet) 2 NO. 8/03/00 7/21/00 6/26/00 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS REVISED PER RCWD COMMENTS DATE DESCRIPTION JCJ JCJ JCJ BY J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS, INC. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN 8618 Maryland Ave. N. Brooklyn Park. MN 55445 Phone: (763) 391 -0243 FAX: (763) 391 -0245 • 893.10 [ 2.4-04p I L 893.31 M4162! ---------- - - - - - - - - - - - PARCFL ............ ..... ..... N 2. ........... WWWWWWWWWW mmalmtommcomw -- 005 lTl POND 2B / / / POND 2A .-- ..-""§HEET DATE 6/27/00 5 PROJECT NO; 5 CADD FLE: 61■Ii5lana RECEVED AUG 0 3 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN MARMON KEYSTONE SITE LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA 2m8M1,4-WW8U a 111111111q1911 f-fi ?TOR 4-41q Ru V,Mnim Marg�lls 0 Company 1 tonescato Contractors nit Wool tottrontour 61V4164IISO Fos $121414011141 0 0 0 0 7. OCLara05co. NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY ALIA Cattrownorsaratatra STAFF ORIGINATOR: C. C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 7 F Jeff Smyser August 28, 2000 Site & Building Plan Review Conditional Use Permit Twin City Fab, Inc., 295 Apollo Drive VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The application includes a site plan and conditional use permit for a metal fabricating business in the private Apollo Business Center. Some outdoor storage on a limited basis will be needed, which requires a conditional use permit. This review is based on the following plan submittals: Site Plan Floor Plan Elevations Grading, Utility, and Erosion Control Plan Photometric lighting plan and fixture diagram Landscaping Plan ANALYSIS 6/27/00 6/27/00 6/27/00 7/21/00 6/28/00 7/7/00 The submittal complies with the LI Light Industrial zoning standards as follows: Required Proposed 4 acres Lot size minimum 1 acre Lot width minimum 100 ft 307 ft Setbacks: buildings from street rear lot line side lot line parking from street rear lot line side lot line 50 ft 30 ft 10 ft 15 ft 5 ft 5 ft 85 ft 300 ft 10 ft 15 ft 400 ft 10 ft Bldg. height 45 ft 21 ft Green space 10% >10% Twin City Fab, Inc. August 28, 2000 page 2 • Building The building footprint is approximately 19,200 sf, roughly 160' x 120'. The building will be 21' high except in the back (north side), where the ground elevation will be lower by seven feet to provide for loading three docks. Precast concrete panels will form the exterior walls. Most of the building will be fabricating/warehouse space. Offices in the southwest portion will comprise about 2040 sf. The trash area will be attached to the back of the building and enclosed by concrete block walls and prefinished metal panel gates. The two areas noted as "future expansion" are not part of this review. Any additions to the building will require a new site plan review and, possibly, an amendment to the storage CUP. • Lighting Light fixture locations are shown on submitted plans as shoebox fixtures on the building walls. The submitted photometric plan showing site lighting intensity indicates that the project complies with the maximum of one foot candle at the street centerline. The shoebox fixtures will ensure lighting is directed downward and not up into the night sky. • Signage The only signage shown on the submittals is on the front facade. Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. • Landscaping TC Fab and Marmon Keystone to the west are coordinating their landscape plans. The landscaping plan includes native and non - native plantings, plowing of compacted soils before seeding, and other elements in accordance with the environmental management plan. The Environmental Specialist's memo is attached. At the August 9 P & Z meeting, Mr. Cliff Reeder of TC Fab expressed concern over prairie plantings in front of the building. He is comfortable with prairie on the back of the site. He would rather have a neater, more conventional landscaping appearance on the front of his new building along the street. The P & Z agreed with the applicant and recommends that the prairie plantings should not be required in front of the building. Staff is comfortable with this. • Utilities Twin City Fab, Inc. August 28, 2000 page 3 Sanitary sewer and water service exist on the north edge of the site. This site will connect to the existing facilities. (The City vacated the 74th St. right of way on May 22 but retained a drainage and utility easement.) Stormwater management on this site includes a pond shared by the property on the west. This common pond will serve both sites. Some of the stormwater facilities on the Twin City Fab site will be constructed by Twin City Fab's contractor, while some will be constructed by the current land owner as part of the ponding for the neighboring site and land to the west of that. This requires coordination of design and construction. We note that the storage area is not delineated on the grading plan. The area would have a finished slope of approximately 10% according to the grading plan. This should be corrected on a final plan. The City Engineer's comments address these issues further. • Parking For light manufacturing, our code requires at least one parking spaces per 2000 sf of gross floor area or one space per employee, whichever is greater. Currently, TC Fab has 12 full time employees and 5 part time. The office area requires 3 spaces plus one space per 200 sf. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the gross building area. The total requirement is 29 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for 9 more if additional employees are added. Even if 100% of the office area were used, it would add only one parking space, and the proof of parking accommodates that. The revised grading and utility plan submitted July 21 shows 28 parking stalls though the site plan shows 29. We consider the site plan as the accurate document on parking stalls. • Roads, Access, Circulation Passenger vehicles will use the parking in the front of the building. Trucks will proceed to the back of the building to the loading docks. Curb and gutter will surround the parking area. The City Engineer recommends curb around the entire paved drive area. gross area 90% code requirement required spaces total footprint 19,200 sf office 2,040 sf 1836 3 plus one space per 200 sf 12 mfg/warehouse 17,160 sf 15,444 2000 8 17 one space per sf or one per employee TOTAL 29 The total requirement is 29 parking spaces. The plan shows 29, with an area provided for 9 more if additional employees are added. Even if 100% of the office area were used, it would add only one parking space, and the proof of parking accommodates that. The revised grading and utility plan submitted July 21 shows 28 parking stalls though the site plan shows 29. We consider the site plan as the accurate document on parking stalls. • Roads, Access, Circulation Passenger vehicles will use the parking in the front of the building. Trucks will proceed to the back of the building to the loading docks. Curb and gutter will surround the parking area. The City Engineer recommends curb around the entire paved drive area. Twin City Fab, Inc. August 28, 2000 page 4 A shared driveway provides access to the site. The driveway will be shared by TC Fab and the Marmon Keystone site on the west. The driveway is consistent with the joint powers agreement with Anoka County that covers the number and type of accesses on Apollo Drive. A shared driveway agreement between the two sites will be necessary and staff is recommending that one be submitted for City review as a condition of approval. In reviewing shared driveways, we must consider potential traffic conflicts in the driveway itself. Vehicles leaving the sites come from two directions and mix in the driveway before exiting onto Apollo. For example, a car leaving the TC Fab parking area to go west on Apollo crosses the path of a car leaving the other site and going east on Apollo. The potential problem is reduced as the mixing point is moved farther back from Apollo. Numerous site factors influence the location of the parking drive: the location of the pond in the rear of the site, the area needed for trucks, the resulting building location, and the needed parking. The applicants have moved the parking drive as far back as possible given the constraints. Moving it farther would reduce the ability to expand the building to accommodate growth in the business. • Park Dedication Park dedication will be subject to the City policy of $133 per 1000 sf of commercial building. For TC Fab, with 19,200 sf, the dedication would be $2554. • Outdoor Storage Conditional Use Permit Outdoor storage is allowed as a conditional use in the LI zone per Ordinance 02 -00, adopted this past February. Two sets of findings must be made. Findings for All Conditional Use Permits: As stated in Sec. 2 Subd. 2.B.7., the Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it can make findings that the proposed use at the proposed location: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. b. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and/or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. e. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Twin City Fab, Inc. August 28, 2000 page 5 f. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. g. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. h. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. i. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. Findings Specific to Outdoor Storage: In addition to those findings, Ordinance 02 -00 (amending Section 8, Subd. I.1) states that outdoor storage in the LI zone must meet the following criteria: a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring uses, residential zoning districts and public rights -of -way per Sec. 3, Subd. 4.S of the Zoning Ordinance. The storage area shall be screened 100% from residential properties. b. Storage area is fenced in a manner approved by the City. c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the City Council. d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.H. of this Ordinance or other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this Ordinance and not in front yards. f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, including land in a neighboring city. "Abutting" includes across a street. "Abutting" does not include properties that touch only corner -to- corner. g. The property shall not abut I -35W or I -35E. h. The storage area shall not abut a school or a public park. i. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. j. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. The plans comply with the conditions for outdoor storage. The site complies with the locational restrictions. The storage will be fenced with 8' chain link, and screened with ivy on the fence and other landscaping. The storage area will be partly pave Twin City Fab, Inc. August 28, 2000 page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on June 28. That Board did not have a complete landscape plan to review. Nonetheless, it made several recommendations, which are attached to this report. A complete landscape plan was submitted and the Environmental Specialist has endorsed it (see attached memo). It includes native and non - native planting as well as treatment of compacted soils. Coordination by neighboring properties for landscaping was accomplished. Thus, the project complies with most of the recommendations. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Staff recommends the following conditions apply: 1. A shared driveway agreement for the access to Apollo Drive must be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and recorded with the County. 2. An 8' chain link fence shall surround the storage area and ivy planted on the east and west sides of the fenced storage area. 3. Approval of the site plan and conditional use permit is not an implied approval of signage. All signs require a sign permit and must comply with the sign ordinance. 4. Twenty -nine (29) parking stalls shall be constructed as shown on the site plan, with additional area available as shown as "proof of parking" on the site plan. If the City determines parking is a problem, the property owner shall construct additional parking. 5. The paved truck maneuvering area shall have curb around the perimeter. 6. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to grading. 7. Final utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer. 8. The City Engineer's concerns, included in the TKDA memo of July 28, 2000, must be addressed to his satisfaction. 9. Park dedication shall be paid per City policy. 10. Any additions to the building will require a new site plan review and, possibly, an amendment to the storage CUP. Twin City Fab, Inc. August 28, 2000 page 7 11. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. Fire suppression sprinklers are required. 12. Prairie plantings shall not be required in front of the building. All other elements of the landscaping plan shall apply. OPTIONS 1. Approve site plan and conditional use permit based on findings in this report and with the conditions of approval listed above. 2. Deny application for site plan and conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: 1500 PIPER JAFFRAV PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140 PHONE: 651 /292 -4400 FAX: 651 /292 -0083 John Powell Reference: Twin City Fab Copies To: From: Jason Wedel Date: July 28. 2000 Site Review Lino Lakes, Minnesota Commission No. 11985 -002 After reviewing the submitted plans for the above referenced project, we have the following comments: 1) The storm sewer schedule numbering of the structures does not match the plan. 2) The catch basin casting should be a R -3250 A . 3) The details shown are not the City standard details. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to give me a call. An Equal Opportunity Employer Memorandum To: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: 08/01/00 Re: Landscape Plans For Twin City Fab and Marmon Keystone The Landscape Plans for Twin City Fab and Marmon Keystone were designed in response to the Recommendations of the Environmental Board. The designs submitted reflect the concerns of the Environmental Board. These concerns include the use of native grasses and forbs as surface water buffers and the integration/and the restoration of natural systems that once thrived here. The design of Twin City Fab extended the landscape design ideas presented in H & L Messabi. The landscape designs of Twin City Fab and Marmon Keystone have been tied together in common materials and theme. From this perspective, the Landscape Designs of Twin City Fab and Marmon Keystone are appropriate. Memorandum To: Brian Wessel CC: Mary Kay Wyland, Jeff Smyser, John Powell, Mary Alice Divine From: Marty Asleson Date: 06/29/00 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations /Apollo Business District The following recommendations were made at the June 28 Environmental Board Meeting: Marmon Keystone r,% se 11 2-#4 a • All recommendations in staff report. Note item 3 conceming treated wood. This item was discussed and defined to mean creosote or penta- treated wood. • That the Environmental Board see a finished and complete landscape plan and have opportunity to make comment by telephone or email. • That the developer provide a landscape maintenance contract for native areas for a five -year period. • That a lighting plan be submitted with the landscape plan: • That the developer should work with 265 Apollo on a coordinated landscape plan and installation. • That future storage are 1st stage be relocated to 2nd stage area, and that the second stage area be planted with a vegetated buffer until the time ever comes that a second stage storage area be needed. Twin City Fab, Inc. Same as above except item 3 should say move the proposed future storage area to the East instead of West. AGENDA ITEM STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: June 28, 2000 TOPIC: Twin City Fab. Inc. / Land Use Application Review MOW BACKGROUND: Ce Atz, Attached is a TIF Land Use Application and Site Plans for Twin City Fab. Inc. to construct a business building at 295 Apollo Drive. At the May Environmental Board Meeting, the Environmental Board reviewed and made recommendations on the over all site grading, and global landscape issues. The site for Marmon Keystone shows a building, parking lot, on -site water swailing, and a proposed future staging area. A generic and non - specific landscape detail is shown on landscape -plan submittal. Water from the site appears to be directed to a depressional swail area to the Northwest and then to pond 3. OPTIONS: vide a more detailed landscape plan, providing for plant materials appropriate to the site for both native and non - native landscape areas. All non - native area should show irrigation. 2. Provide for a site soils management and reconstruction plan. This plan should include measures to reconstruct landscape soils to an un- compacted state after construction. This plan should_also__show soil organic amendment incorporated into any sub -soil reconstruction process._ 3. Move the proposed future storage area to the West and provide a buffer planting between the storage area and pond 3. 4. RECOMMENDATION: All of the above and any recommendations from the Environmental Board. ) •( 4 -;-.#••• :,■NNI 'Ma mu t I H • is.. • t • ‘255\14 — ,•. -- PDO OF IJNO LAXES1 uesuel • R-2 , .2 At, f26:4--A!.• --/ •- l'r-P-21-,144.-;•-, —17 ;4 'I2,1- st• .:.,---f ..... 7 -.....1 _ r—!--• t __..,.. —_; i 1 - ; .--,—,-1 h_L.c..., 1 ,./.1 ,,t1 , , • ▪ —4-----1 el---1---1"-1-1-1 1-41/445...7-'-- '4%10' 1171 --7 I 1 e# I 1# . ; S . V 11...V. 2—...:',1# _.;ititert2.--,#.- 11.1-1.1 h,..., lf_L—t-----'7 2 ; ., 1 :7 I itii-,I.=-tY--1.-'-',_‘''tiy.-'t-f•-:-1 1' I ilEXINGTOli 1, • 17-14 i--,-- lus■Slyr's2-1-'1R,21L-2 ,1_.. 1,4-1-5 . • 6 25111—L-...„ ; :7713 , 4; -: IC ., I 2 13j. : s is', .....1 ' t---7. . A '•sis • " - 015 ' 46 i ! -----i t•••= 97' 1 1-• ! ., !--tARK-11—.: *-3 ' '7i--.:-i. L-----i-----$riia.roATEI 1--.— •i-# .:....pu....4.2..k..2.2..yt 6 • •!!! • ; = Ai x 6 •,V.s•-/SCIADbil -1-t-r7r-'15111,1/4/122.21; 4314H• 141i, •-•"•-.1 AtER 3 214 • ' 4 7 . ' 2.J • •••1-1-. ,--! . E — i'i-L ,■:"A-71-E: t;.1.N...". D Aop s 1._ .., '..21.... -bt-6,4 tirwet.r-I-rti, 44,:: #0 : . : );1 1,*tIpail_t•:: A .._,..a.....L, .4.7-..2,.?! - 1:10-R..S 5 Lf--i,''...4.FFLF-; 4k--1 ifo. ;12RICV-.7; . • ••-514:1 1 1.1. ' -5.8.45k 11.4.K."1 " "7-' rFT7i:Tfil • tri t'---;171( • s ••• • 11.-Alemsi.4.5,4..1 -45.4 11556-441--• ■7_ +5!ese=1.4..S!1.-.11.7015;e1 e--1 1 le • e !‘ ! ---!!! 51 ' e 1 • ' : ..; . • t hfiiociA._t_o_o...i, t ! • ' 141-41 ssi.., '1-• .1 I r-f5e 240:44 ::-77, 1 - • r ll t E5l4l4.‘• 3 -7-77Th I I —"71 ,3 F" ; 1 - 5 • ADDi —77 r i— i1.ork11 i 2 ADDV".:441' , • • !. • e 1-5!•-•••••5!...,, . I •!, 71 rs. A--; '‘ 4,--,‘Arl • . • so, . I • , • ! 3 • • $ .41474-:,E4An 14; -•:::-.1.172Jr5i2! 4{•‘-• ./ / p j: • ,-- . . ....,,A.,-- ' ,.., .... -i--, • - zvorrr-- nwrpranr'orw,r -.ar no 50 - -',KO" — - —r-- • -- - aounsT-n ° r. —°r°nr of im tit P1,55 nenrxn —ra -- -- 111211I11111111111111 FAR A D NORTH ±+�� 100000 "rURYe ���m'�EI i FARE 134 LAKES REHASILITATIO1 CENTER FASEPRECIF ao0g00Pg EJ� tio ° j eilMW MARSHAN LAKE 00 MEM , 1 4 MOM ors NOM ® U sanoppgcom sir= •1 _ppe� r ME �OJnGf�ea22 COM I ' O, tt <ft a c I ! I • o_ w • ,o , rit :4 If IF 4,1111 111 11 -I 11111 1 1 1 1i* 4011111[111111— 4 6 fr 20 to" ol- 4o' - o o" 0 4t; (CD 0 6 T 4F141T15-T,, 3. o' 4Frici A.rsfiA / I L 4 1 Lt.% '1 r 0 t> T r 1 I I t1 1 vEr 0 1' 4 0_ 0 11 --> to ;x- (ID> _h. es • 0 d \Y* r Ll . -Si 2 I NEWRY CERTIFY TRAT TWA MAR, SRECIEKATIOR OR REPORT WAS PREPARED ET YE OR U■1001 SIRECT SUPERVISIOR ARO THAT I NA A MN Ae.cs ITEkr mom TIM LA. Of TIN A,,ATErf ROOINIESOTA. DATE 6/ oo tobli FISCHER • ENGINEERING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA MEE, ItC1&151Wct for. TWIN/ GIP.? #,413 Arpt-Co DMUS Arot-1,0 aslIXISTIzaat. rzal..14 eti;Je>1.3=AWSS7..10,115J WS-50 TA% - - DRAWN $Y XIX 9. I DATE 5/2-3/00 11U1S2111 co-yco Fr-A WITT foovf- cceN.A.y rY 21216_•;Yzi2;:r,_22.0_ 12(242., 01111111 1!--F ru t9 it— ; r T c i4; ! _ 71-." . ^ . 5‘-4' 2 3 r r r tL! )-oo• (Jo OSSI.SY MAD. THAT THIS SLAM, SIECITICATPON OA SUOITT WAS WASSAILIO LLY WS OS WIMP Hy MSC. SUSSPIHSPOS AMO TNAT I AY A 0111.1• maisreneo ARC.)4 ITLT mots THE LAWS OF T ST I. OP PUNNESOTA. leejair ge/4.4_, PATE 0, MO. NO. 1.08,11 FISCHER__ itEsttt-3,11,14.cotu -cart rtr2a!:. ENGINEERING _2VnireVZ-17 ViaiL;TtAXt■ TArger4 UTISKr-14.1011,F; mirT.IS 00176 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA : _a7.1..1a12&1101s15- _ _ _ .-72.X4E1-41"--415*–C477?-0217: 1711-4 //740111;‘. 77111:214Erilir--. mom 401kt re94- rati-tt 2r .... a - . =,....„ i ... _... . _ [ " 1----T , _... ! r-- .1-- • -1.__i 1!--F ru t9 it— ; r T c i4; ! _ 71-." . ^ . 5‘-4' 2 3 r r r tL! )-oo• (Jo OSSI.SY MAD. THAT THIS SLAM, SIECITICATPON OA SUOITT WAS WASSAILIO LLY WS OS WIMP Hy MSC. SUSSPIHSPOS AMO TNAT I AY A 0111.1• maisreneo ARC.)4 ITLT mots THE LAWS OF T ST I. OP PUNNESOTA. leejair ge/4.4_, PATE 0, MO. NO. 1.08,11 FISCHER__ itEsttt-3,11,14.cotu -cart rtr2a!:. ENGINEERING _2VnireVZ-17 ViaiL;TtAXt■ TArger4 UTISKr-14.1011,F; mirT.IS 00176 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA : _a7.1..1a12&1101s15- _ _ _ .-72.X4E1-41"--415*–C477?-0217: 1711-4 //740111;‘. 77111:214Erilir--. mom 401kt re94- rati-tt PP ,_______E____--E E- E '.‘.--S1-'----- -A-11Y0 c --.E.-.-0, E_________-__E ,p,5 ''). T . P,0°' ....,....=__=g,L.--....A.T.L.--.w--y,-.1-- A - 99 vAc,AT D 7 4T Lt .--.:,-,--TL.,.=..1' 7-'7:T ^,,V_ER._:.,.7HEAD ELECTRIC . oorN,,_____,„_____Or,:____ 1359.24 - ---. ,74----..- -.CY) I ■"1.1,,,"`' •NATF_RN_E=•11_sINI) L.______„, - " ,IT■YO _,,,,, V-- n 60 EDGE OF 31rJ1.41NOuS ____ __- - - w_L--w-_w-w- - A'':),„:--"•,• c. V 0_ . 0.81 - •--cm ' - 725.00 55 / /-00.52 ' LO .p,O• 0°••-• 400'. LC - .....■1D T. 31, R. 22 • •-•• I 13=1 - - ...-• . -4------4.04 E a 91110,6N009- -7110 -, '''f•--- - AND 7 z .....,_.... sT. S. NH 2Y cri-ERS • - - ._....T___I ,9 roP . 857.4 599.29 599.25 ,._ 612.9.2.3-'Ci3-7c2oR.NESNwomeNSElicTRET07/CirtaxicxNG _ 396.91 - - ____ vERIFy WATERIAAIN SIZE 99q IC 1 •• / AND LOCATION. vi. = 390.28 S _ ,..., ":t. • • -"' - - .._ _____ .____ . , r_________________..... .. .-.•• / --p . . -.-....•.. .2 -17:11 90' ,,..--e 7 i/1 , 899.. _ \ _/ -.00-- - 902 - - -902:1.4 1 CORE-DRILL cONNECT To ExiSTING SAN. S. m14. • .. .... . ___ ...'..'... ..... ..........:::. -.•.-. _ . __ . _ . _ . ' . ' ... .• •"• • •••. • :. • - - ----- • • AmenserirtartANNON■er-,ress.s, ,,,, , 7.'4r .2.20 s I! ui ---902 RN. ■ 885.28t FIEU) . ....... , ....... _ yr.... .............„, .. ........... . ... . ... . . .. , , ..y...-%....-'-'-':..-..."Y: :.:::.. _ '''' _.. :. ••:. - - - • •• • - - • -: ' . ,.....iiiiiir'''"':- l-. STORM' SEWER I EMEISI 9?2.1 i VERIFY MH LOCATION ANO INvERT ELEVATION. GENERAL NOTES: 3Y 0 ERS 1.' .* 4-9°1 • • -....•-. , •-.. • • • , _ ..... . -... • • • ............,...,•.....• • 903.14 1. Existing boundary, location, topographic. one utility information snown on this Plan is from a field surto/ by ... . . . '' . arri■....Nli ---.."." . /1 'AND-PLACED /g- YA 4. .L. .,.., I RIPRAP TO , , • • ..: • .. • • ..- • -. • •- • • •••••••••••• - .. ••: : .•'• '.. ' - 4/519•SY3f//P)246. "."7" i. poN. aorro4 -61 5,' 7 , ...,_..._, N . Corley Torgersen, Inc. 2. Refer to the 'Osman for the most current site layout ana dimensions. • - - • ':• •• - :".y.'.: • • •• • ". • •••-•:•:'•:-IyiMittr4.'.43...47::.':',' , I .... AxIthj1 I 902.77 3. Perform ali utility wort in accordance with State and City ryouffernents. -•• "'''• .. .-:::%.%.... • • ....... ....'.....::.:::"..1.:•.....:•:•.....• -''''''''1717•7 .73/ m 1 Q 902.- 7 ..•••' •---' L4I r GATEXALM 8' HYDRANT LEAD 4. The locations of existing utilities shown on this pion ore from record information. The Engineer does not NssORA P.0 v,R, :398Y OTHERS - 441,t1141•N11111444411411144'414,11'. •;:ii:i1:::::::.i.... Q 8 --- .13 ANO FIRE HYDRANT guarantee mot ail existing utilities are shown or, 1( Gown. exist in the locations indcateo cn tne ;Ion. It is the -4411641146410%ts. ( 101.16A ---- ..--- Controctor's responsibility to ascertain the find vertical and norizontal iodation of oil existing utilities (including water anal sewer lines arta appurtenancee). Notify the EngMeer al any aiscrecorraies. . '41:1052■1 II 8 L_D I , . • . . ' HI - 913.7 (4:9T 903.57 5. Contact utility cormanies for location. of all public ond private utilities within the work arm prior to oeginning construction. Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CAU. at #651-454-0002 in the metro area. or #1 -800-2.52-1166 RC APRON BY OTTIERS 05 o -.6 t=11 free tar exact locations of existing utilities at least 48 working hours before oeginning any constniction in INV. = 894.0 .. • • 1.35,1_9. ',.: It ' 95.00 R :3, A / . • 'madonna with Minnesota Statute 2160. Obtain ticket number Ina meet with representotives of the various .44444*%-s-o-Nikts\-NIS..;.:....::-1....:...::.....:::d.:: co I ,/ . 9. -. . utilities at the site. Provide the Owner with the ticket number information. Canner State One Call . a free service that locates municipal ond utility company 'inn, but trees not Ideate aryate utility lines. Use an MEMO inamendent locator service or other means in order to obtain locations af 'rivals utility lines including. but not limited to. undergrouno amine moles, telephone, TV. and lawn sprinkler lines. . / A 903.1• 9C3.5 • 6. Pothole to verity the oositions of existing underground it at a sufficient number of locations in order to INFILTRATION AREA .....•_ 1 assure thot no conflict with the proposed work exists and that sufficient clearance is *voided. •.:':'• ..g iiin .,.. ?3 902.62 •• I , 'Ci . r-47-10 / 7. Where existing gas. electric. cable. or teiephone utilities conflict with the Wark. coordinate the mondani.. SEE PLANS BY JC JOHNSON r .... g0 \ I , 4•0101:411 i I relocation. offset. or support of the existing utilities with the appropriate lanai utility calumnies. Coordinate new RIPRAP CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR 4r• . “•4 gos meter ana gas line installation. electric meter and electric service installation, coole service. and telecnone DESIGN AND DETAILS OF •.....• •... 9j3.54 Service instailation with Om local utility companies. PROPOSED POND. POND RC APRON ::'.:1.....t. 1. ...-: 4. :4, \ 1 yil_ e 56S. I S. Arming. far ana secure suitable disposal areas cif -site. Dispose of all excess sok waste rnateriol, aeons, and all moteriais not assignated tar salvage. Waste material and deoris includes tram, stumps, OM concrete. • CONSTRUCTION BY OTHERS. INV.. 896.00 .:. ::::::,,:: ...,:::t, .:.... i f.',; • • er, 65' CO 65. 903.67 \ . : 4.1.",,,g1 TOP . 899.25 • \ , 01 SAN. S. MH asphaltic concrete, c.a. or other waste material from the construction operations. -. ---- ,-) \.:...-.1::..,.::::....... . 1111 ;:.... ::.:::::::::. 111_ iiiiiiiiigg ' 902.72 1 \ 9 .26 01 4.. 0 081 0 . ', I.-_..L__. INV. = 892.02 9. Straight line saw-cut misting oduminaus or concrete surfacing at the perimeter of pavement removal arms. Ilse sows that provide water to the Plate. Tack. and matcn all connections to misting oituminous oovement. 10. Relocate overhaul power, telephone, aria cable Ono! as required. Abandon Ond report existing an-site weds ono 7 • / ..... . . . \ 1 1.:- ..:-:. ....... -. ".1. • 1: ..,,,tiva: \ \ -i .-..... •......:- . :.: , .......: g),, vlitifo.j. ci 97..,. _ c, septic systems in accordance with minnesoto Department of Health (MOH) requirements. .......:'*: :..:1 ::1:: :: '• . .7, -4. - • .-,ri17:- 13 •...,. 903.04 f.. -- \ __, r ...\ ' ' . , 902.13 11. Provide traffic control in accordance with !cool authorities and the Midmemta Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Gtajgod ImMUTC0). including the Find Manual /or Temporary Traffic Corm' 7onn I area,. Motel April 1995. 1::::1:::::::::.:'.1. .......:..• 4\ N 9_1°. • ..(.. -.• .....• -........ 12. Provoe ana maintain temporary drainage throughout construction 'until due permanent drainage system and Q3902.70 I structure. ore in place ona aoerationai. tristail temporary ditches. doing, pumps, or other means as neoessay. r WIDE CURB CUT 1 .14:1-:)::.:-.- : ...: ..1.?;! t°"7 1 \ 902. ' /-firG 3.50 \ t in oraer to insure proper aroinage at all time. Provide icivi points at building parrs or roadways with positive autfatls. (SEE DETAIL) 902./.,.: \ 141 , 13. Protect sub grease from damage oy surface water runoff. • ' :::::O°i: I Illri&q57/ S. ,c) , : ' LO ."..4. ..4, '5/ I . %.\ V 0, \ . 14. Full design strength ie not availoble in bituminous posement areas until the final lift of monad M compacted into t-5 place. Protect pmement areos from ovaloadin by delivery trucks. construchm equipment. and other mantes. 05 4 .• 1777 \ I= 7).1. 90° • .2. 78 ..7. 902.26 15. Comely with the mrk safety oracticee specified by the Occupational Safety and Heolth Administration (OSHA). 111131EMII !.:-....... %:::...,::::: ---- ......,f4.... 1:NEI' 0 •• 8 'to • 2.50 , ...., \ as i I'S s.... Comply ath all applicable local. state. and federal safety regulations Construction safety is solely the rmoonsibility of the Contractor. mo is also solely responsible for the means. methods. and sequencing of the construction operations. TOP 4 900.35 '......?f, + soo 1 \ LA . --• •Z-„„ 16. When sawing or drilling concrete or rnamnry. um says toot provide water to the Olode. 896.45 - r / 90.3[2,31-... , ,-..\,0 , - 1, 9.•' II. I ..1:,1 902.6 1, ..a• ,'' • 8 \ "t-3 CI 17. Adjust all solve. manhOe, cotchoasin, and clmnout covers to finished grade. 1 cjivi r‘i ',1'.9l. Willit ' clici ...-.‘g Vitti , '209 CM 49 , KW 1,„ .0/4k..• az 0 ..... cos ll i ZI• , I • . RC APRON By 0THERS \ ....- 'A / ‘VP•:-.".*--\ -). 90103 1 \ \ /1 902.16 2% rnmirmen slope in all directions in handicapped accessible porting areas. 19. Commence pipe laying at the Wriest point in the proposed am., line. Loy the pine with tne bell ena or INV. = 897.58 4' \ , -IA receiving groove end of the pipe aointing upgrade. When connmtIng to an existing pipe. uncover the existing t 90 \ pipe in cinder to allow any adjustments in the oraposed line and grod• before laying any doe. „..../ 02." • i'3 / ,d).,:lii: ' IV --"---- ''‘ A. 1. It PROPOSED WAREHOUSE/OFRCE 1 20. AM matcsiols reouired for this work shall b• new material conforming to the requirements for doss, kind, grade, size. audit), and ether details spKiried herein Or as shown on the Plans. Do nal use recycled or sahaged 1 ‘1%), er.;7:,,,--0:4"-11 -,1%, 0 . '1.. FFE = 904.50 902.21 \ aggregate. asphaltio imminent. crushed concrete. or scrap mingles. Unless otherwise indicated. the Contractor snail furnish all required materids. / '940:0e. % Ul ram °./ rr DIP CTUE04t13 st.„.. E=3 ..4 902.58 \ / 4' • •. ul k '-il i 9' •' 'Zg 174:fa%riEZ:n08 STORM SEWER SCHEDULE 0 . t1 -L'o '2 u. \ No. TYPE CASTING 3ARREL i ----. 1--1 ••• /), -, o02.. IMEM 1:111:1 CB I CURB BOX NEENAH R-3067-OR/OL 4' DIA. // •••-, --...„;,. • 90 9-•••-• '1/4 ( • 0140 4 l'. "901 901.95 BENCH MARI< ELEV. = 902.06 SAH 2 • TYPE 'a- SOLID NEENAH R-1642 9 W/ -STORM SEWER' STAMP 4 DIA. / 0:...... m 0,5 I'S •\ fr.:- 1\ i • X.50 , ,.. t CIES3 TOP OF IRON PIPE AT S.E. COR. OF PR( NH 3 TYPE .9.' SouD NEENAH R-1642 9 2/ .STORm 56,209" STAMP 4' DIA. / 902 ''.3..;\ / 11:1F-.141111;0--- -24‘1\k\ Cita 2., -.." • 903 902.305 ---*" ""•--. CP inn ---c ::, K\ 11111. 411 . •kit 902.01 \l,•••••• \ tAggi Ale \ -., - 11 --- --- ...--- 41!175 \ Is' \ 1 904 Clir"' • . '• • 5 T . 3.90 ,.... ..---- 962. 1- A• 02.20 .----' ...--• TT\ •g•I''. T•r\ .4-4----- _ , - • .......;;_901 901.04 ...--• 0 1-C• 114 .....„ , 31sT. S. ce \ ,c.., , TOP ■ 901.35 CO IBEEILM `-_ sous' 111/4 , 300.34 r;i3-7. ..„ -11,- _.....g%T.- INV. . WC1:::1 CZ) TOP ■ 903.45 G I 3.90 N, INV. w 897.37 • ' • - rAT• C:D .......0.00):■#'11h11111°°- ...... Al. , „ 4. I 3.53•W , \ --.1 lime, - taxa 4- 15- ,., ,\ 5 ik11 , 0 -,-_-,_-_, . < .., -:-,‘- , ,, ‘ .,.< ,...,.., ., 1„:„...-- 9.3 , q0 ----,i ----___so_, -. ---- o . c; 0 c\-, .z.• -0- ,g-a,..- -,gT---_- zi.---,==;'. ?!---- , vii...... f' 14 9; 2 _. -699 -....._ -.4.4.... , , \ \,........' , .---• -- ,.......• --- --- ... M. ...-- .....---- -I. ' ..•-••• 57;1 . 4 -•-----v( ' Z ,Q....\\._•) , Lk/ .--J --.1 1:4° .---). f 1--) # `447:3VMDE NUMBER: •-.62-.15,?.-".t.-..'a :AL: SUCRE "CI: :la . ' ST. S. NH .5)4 137mER5:12__ -... 3. .53 ,...:\ --I / \o-o- , -:= = g:',4. 5 vl. 4 695.G5 107---, -L.. - -....._ -,, _...- - '-r• ....•;-'5"."".• •T.-•■-' • TEmPORARY ROCK--- e . '." - :11415411*.-11A.:- • CONSTRUCTIoN 7,- ENTRANCE --. - '72...'n.• -e-i....b1,-...-r.- A . __ r -- • ,, . . ...) ) _--- \---\'‘ ---- ---- - C29 40.2..6'' in•N \'''''. ..--' ,....„_..0,,-- , _- ----- -- --- -- -- ---- __.---- sc...,,7--- ---- -I ---- -. i ■Ic".-" -----1 I) "... - 733--- ---___----....-- _11 9°s. Q6 ----"---- .. .0 -s'-'-:"----- :-....-- -- __... ....,.... , .i.... ..... 0 30 3 1 30 60 _______------- •-...;4........%:-.--._., -_,...,_.<- ,..„&i .-- . , _____ ;;11.=r --...„ -„Ye --- ,------" ,c------' SCALE •N .--- "--- ----'-'-.f..------. -----' ';;.-.st:'7 -'1"-----. .---'7"-----_,-------.. , ,„.'>"' I • , . \ ..... ....-- 1.................- ., ......„...../ --""- ..--- 7....3...... ....- 9.01-- '74 - ----. , 9 ' ,_.- ____,--'"-:-.-- c.a 5,-.12.' --- ---- -r. --',.) - --- - Rr, .:C0 ---- ---'..1 ..........-----. ..........-----' .„..- )r'''.-- ,--s---- ! :C-5.4 ". . i S Ma 0 0 0 A 2 in 0 10 L 2 l S]>100'-1 ONI1 mid NV 0g z J g AGENDA ITEM 7 G STAFF ORIGINATOR: _ Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: Town Center Development Standards Endorsement CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The City received a grant in 1998 to plan our Town Center. We have applied for additional money —$1.5 million —for implementation. We are rated at the top of the list. The Met Council has let us know that the development standards are important to show the City is serious about implementing a mixed use, compact development plan. While we have yet to process the zoning amendment to adopt the standards officially, we need to show substantial support for the Town Center concept. The statement of endorsement below will show support for the Town Center concept: a mix of uses in a compact, walkable design. EDAC voted to adopt a statement indicating support for the standards. The P & Z voted 6 -0 to adopt the statement with two minor changes, which are underlined. Endorse the preliminary and draft Town Center standards as recommended by staff with the understanding that the City may revise specific language and requirements in the standards. (The signage standards (section 3.8) will be temporarily pulled from the standards for further review.) Revisions would occur as part of the process for amending the City's zoning ordinance to include standards for a new Town Center zoning district. The public hearing and discussion over the past four months has been for educational purposes. We will have to process the Town Center standards as an amendment to the zoning ordinance. Staff intends to schedule the public hearing for the zoning amendment for the September 13 meeting of the P & Z. There will be two elements to the zoning amendment, rezoning the land and the new standards. Staff continues working to revise the document and will have it completed for the public hearing. OPTIONS 1. Adopt the statement of endorsement of the Town Center standards. 2. Do not endorse the Town Center standards. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : August 9, 2000 TIME STARTED 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED . 8:43 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT Corson, Lane (arrived at 6:32 p.m.), Rafferty, Schilling, Schaps, and Zych MEMBERS ABSENT • Johnson STAFF PRESENT : City Planner Smyser; City Engineer Powell (part); and Economic Development Director Brian Wessel (part), Mary Kay Wyland, Planning Coordinator (part) I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning : ning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., August 9, 2000. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Jul Mr. Rafferty requested a correction discussion on the Tree Prese then maybe it is just not sup c1u't`e his comment during the conclusion of the nce to indicate that if all of that is required, Mr. Zych made a MOTION to approve the revised minutes of the July 12, 2000, meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board, and was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 5 -0. Ms. Lane arrived at 6:32 p.m. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Schaps advised that due to staff involvement in a Council workshop, the first item for consideration will be Item F, Public Hearing (Continuation),Ordinance 09 -00, Tree Preservation Ordinance. The agenda was approved. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared Open Mike open at 6:33 p.m. Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 2 No one was present for Open Mike. Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:34 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. Due to staff involvement at a Council worksession, Chair Schaps explained that Items F and G would be considered first. Once staff was available, Item A would be considered. V. ACTION ITEMS F. PUBLIC HEARING (Continuation), Town Center Development Standards Chair Schaps declared the public hearing reopened at 7:35 p.m. Staff noted the Planning & Zoning Board opened the public hearing on the new standards at the April meeting and kept it open to allow extensive discussion and public input. No additional developers have expressed an interest in presenting information. The Economic Development Advisory Committee met o gust 3, 2000 for further discussion of the proposed standards and voted on ommendation. Staff advised that their recommended revisions have been inc . orate was explained that due to the application for grant funds, it is now nece pay° further the Town Center project. Staff recommended the Board adopt the endorse t statement as outlined in the staff report. Staff explained that once the stars €�e dorsed, the Metropolitan Council will be so advised and the grant funds qu ,' `° taff noted the revisions have been identified in the standards by strike u = °-rlined wording as well as the inclusion of an index of revisions made. Mr. Corson asked if the are Smyser stated that is correct, t changed. have not changed from the initial discussion. Mr. boundaries of the Town Center have not been Mr. Corson noted a previous presentation related to integration of housing densities and asked if that would be implemented on the north side as well. Mr. Smyser presented a map of the Town Center and noted the language revision from a restrictive statement on the Land Use Plan to indicate the boundaries shown on the land use plan are approximate and that as long as the development conforms to the regulating plan, boundaries may change based on detailed site analysis. Mr. Smyser identified the land area that was included in the concept submitted for the Livable Communities Grant. He noted the overall residential densities will need to be maintained, however, the boundaries of those densities are flexible. Mr. Corson asked if the grant would apply to the entire area. Mr. Smyser pointed out the southern area where the grant would be focused and stated he is unsure if those funds could be transferred to the northern area. Mr. Zych reviewed the language revision on Page 12 and asked if the bank and clinic were included in the Highway Commercial zone. Mr. Smyser pointed out the location of Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 3 those uses and stated they would be colored as Highway Commercial on the map since those uses were similar to the uses geared to be designed for vehicle access rather than pedestrian access. Mr. Zych asked about the Rehbein property which is also identified to be added to the Highway Commercial District. Mr. Smyser pointed out the Rehbein property located to the south of the bank and clinic which would be changed to Highway Commercial since it abuts the highway. Mr. Zych asked if the County wants additional access for the highway. Mr. Smyser stated the County will not allow another access to Lake Drive. Mr. Zych asked if the plan indicates there will be limited access to these Highway Commercial parcels. Mr. Smyser pointed out the access locations from Lake Drive, noting this is under County jurisdiction. Mr. Schilling asked what the next step is if the standards are endorsed. Mr. Smyser stated it would be presented to the City Council with a recommendation that they approve the same endorsement statement. Public hearings would be scheduled with the Board in September and then returned with a recommendatio . the City Council. He stated the commercial areas were highlighted by most as hav cerns and he believed the residential areas would be easier to revise since 're are design and access issues. Mr. Smyser stated they will still need to revie blic streetscape issues to assure there are not too many restrictions or unre stic ctations. He stated the official rezoning process would then follow. Ms. Lane asked if Mr. Fefercorn w the Town Center. Mr. Smyser exp the Town Center idea by real' exit ramp with a double pu Town Center. Mr. Smyser sta negotiations have not concluded. ng direct access from the interstate into Mr. Fefercorn had suggested "stretching" eway entry ramp to align with the northbound served to either enter the freeway or enter the has debated that option with MnDOT but those Mr. Rafferty commented on the need to assure, as the City grows and the needs of the citizens are met, that the correct foundations are laid so a mistake is not made. He stated staff and the consultants deserve a lot of credit for the documents they drafted. However, while staff is comfortable with the standards and funding is being requested from the Metropolitan Council, he thinks the City is trying to put a stamp of approval on a document that is not, as yet, complete. Mr. Rafferty stated it may cost some dollars to assure the document is properly completed but he would support a continuation until all issues are "wrapped up." He stated he still has questions and does not believe he has been given enough time to raise those questions or debate the issues involved. Mr. Smyser stated staff's concern is funding of $1.5 million and if the opportunity is lost, it would be a large impact. He stated staff is not requesting formal adoption but, rather, an endorsement. Mr. Smyser stated it is very clear this is in no way a final stamp of approval but the indication would be support for this direction and concept. He asked if the Board would like to revise the language of the suggested endorsement. Mr. Smyser Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 4 reported that Lino Lakes' grant was highly ranked by the Metropolitan Council and the final funding decision will be made next month. Mr. Rafferty suggested that continuing the public hearing would not result in a formal approval but would show support of endorsement. He asked if the Metropolitan Council requires the document to be finalized and stated the Board met for two and one -half months several times to discuss these issues and held public hearings on the town center but made no major changes were made. Mr. Rafferty stated he felt the presentation by Mr. Fefercorn took the project intention in another direction. Mr. Wessel clarified nothing improper is being done and staff is not suggesting adoption but, rather, endorsement. He explained this is the public input portion of the process and the City has been following a very public process with the grant application. However, the work is behind schedule and this issue needs to be moved forward. Mr. Wessel stated the planning funds to develop these standards makes it possible to be eligible for the implementation funds. The review for the implementation grant is currently underway and would totally fund the implementation of the livable communities regulations. Mr. Wessel stated in early September, the next cut will b ade in the grant funding, advising that the Lino Lakes grant is currently ranked num He stated he believes the Town Center is vital and the staff request is for an ind' ion o ection which can be presented to the City Council. He noted that ents can continue to occur to the standards, even following the Council's e Chair Schaps agreed the consideratio • fo ��';�+ orsement only, noting the zoning ordinance will be presented before for to adoption which will provide another forum to raise the valid concerns t �' e en expressed tonight. He suggested the endorsement statement be rev ate the endorsement is of the "preliminary and draft" Town Center standar the City may revise specific "language and" requirements. Staff indicated the suggested language would be acceptable. Chair Schaps stated while he is comfortable with the basic framework of the standards, there are issues that remain unresolved, such as the sign regulations. In response to Mr. Zych, Mr. Wessel explained that the Comprehensive Plan was to have been adopted by December of 1998, however that has not occurred. He stated that while it would be best to have the Comprehensive Plan in place prior to ordinance amendments, that may not occur and this process needs to move forward. Ms. Lane indicated her support to endorse the standards. She asked if the normal process would be followed for these considerations, to assure the Board is included in that process. Mr. Smyser stated the Board will be included in that process. Ms. Lane asked that the Board receive updates as that process is followed. Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 5 Mr. Schilling stated he does not believe an endorsement will "tie the hands" of the Board but, rather, this is in the schematic and design phase for the final document. He indicated support for endorsement. Mr. Rafferty stated he would like to clarify that there was nothing in his statements to indicate something improper was being done. He stated he fully endorses what the staff has done but Page 3, the summary of recommended changes to the Town Center Standards, was not received until the meeting packet arrived and he would have appreciated receiving the information ahead of time so there was enough time for review and to ask questions. Based on that and rewording of the endorsement, he indicated he would support endorsement. Chair Schaps asked if anyone would like to make comment. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:17 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to endorse the prelimi as recommended by staff with the understanding t language and requirements in the standards. (T temporarily pulled from the standards for furt of the process for amending the City's zon Town Center zoning district, and was sup G. PUBLIC HEARING, (Co Ordinance Chair Schaps declared the p and draft Town Center standards City may revise specific andards [Section 3.8] will be ew.) Revisions would occur as part ce to include standards for a new s. Lane. Motion carried 6 -0. rdinance 09 -00, Tree Preservation n reopened at 7:20 p.m. Staff reviewed the Board's past c sideration of the proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance. He reported that after the last meeting, staff analyzed a hypothetical development with regard to the requirements of the draft Tree Preservation Ordinance. The site analyzed is about 7.7 acres including road right -of -way and 17 lots. Staff presented their findings and recommended the public hearing be continued to allow staff to pursue this analysis further for presentation at the September meeting. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to September 13, 2000 to allow the staff to complete its analysis and recommendation, and was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Smyser thanked the audience for their patience, noting staff is now available to present the staff reports for Items A -E. A. Steve Benesch, 8251 Lake Drive, Minor Subdivision Staff presented the application by Steve Benesch for a minor subdivision at 8251 Lake Drive that would add a 1,777 square foot triangle (24' x 144') to his existing parcel of property in order to correct an encroachment onto the neighbor's property created when a Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 6 garage slab was placed over the property line. The property owner at 8255 Lake Drive has a "flag lot" with 2.35 acres and has agreed to sell this triangular parcel to the applicant. The applicant's parcel is .72 acres in size and the driveway is located on the northerly side of the 50 -foot strip of property. Staff noted the location of the mature trees and septic system and recommended approval of the minor subdivision with the four conditions outlined in the staff report. Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he would like to make comment. Steve Benesch, applicant, stated his neighbor is in full support of this request. It was noted that Dave Stoppelman was present in the audience to comment, if needed. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the request of Steve Benesch for a minor subdivision at 8251 Lake Drive that would add a 1,777 square foot triangle (24' x 144') to his existing parcel of property in order to correct an encroachment onto the neighbor's property, with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are issued prior to 2. The minor subdivision shall be recorded wi any building permits. 3. Additional right -of -way shall be deed reconstruction of Lake Drive if re I 'red way shall be dedicated from Mr. • building permits. 4. No park dedication shall b dditional construction. ka County prior to issuance of oka County for the future e County. This additional right -of- operty prior to issuance of any h this minor subdivision. The motion was supported by y. Motion carried 6 -0. B. Steve Kraus, 8025 W ck Trail, Variance Staff presented the application by Steve Kraus for a variance to allow the construction of a 40' x 40' (1,600 sq. ft.) detached garage in front of his home at 8025 Wood Duck Trail. The property is zoned Rural and guided for low- density unsewered residential development in the draft Comprehensive Plan. According to the Zoning Ordinance, Mr. Kraus is allowed a total of 3,600 square feet of accessory building space on his 3.25 acres. Construction of this proposed structure will bring his total accessory building space to 2,384 square feet which is well within the requirements of the Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance also provides that "No detached accessory structure shall be closer to the front lot line than the principal building or its attached garage." Thus, the variance requested is to allow the accessory building in front of the principal building. Staff pointed out the location of the trees on this lot and presented the rationale required to be found when considering a variance. Staff advised that Wood Duck Trail was added to the MSA system so if reconstructed to those standards, an additional ten feet of right -of -way would be needed at that time. Thus, the request for the garage to be relocated an additional ten feet towards the west. Staff recommended approval subject to the two conditions outlined in the staff report. Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 7 Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he would like to make comment. Steve Krause, applicant, stated he did not know the right -of -way was an issue until he received the staff report. He stated he understands the reason for this request in case the roadway is improved but he is not necessarily in agreement due to the location of his well and low drainage area. Mr. Krause stated the proposed location is higher in elevation so he would prefer that it not be relocated. Chair Schaps explained the concern of the City to assure the garage meets the required setbacks should the roadway be improved and widened. He asked if meeting this requirement will be a problem. Mr. Krause stated he has placed 32 dump loads of dirt in his proposed location and more fill would be needed to relocate the garage. Also, trees would have to be removed to assure proper drainage is maintained. Mr. Krause stated the driveway area has also been filled. Ms. Lane asked if it is feasible to drive over the area he well. Ms. Wyland stated a distance needs to be maintained from the location ell. Mr. Schilling asked if this size of garage is ne heated, and used for his wood working ho been completed in preparation for the con r. Krause stated it is, it would be ted all of the fill and grading have Mr. Krause reviewed his work wit . f • learn the setback requirements prior to purchasing the property in January ��11 s. Wyland stated the general information was provided over the teleph plan was not provided and Mr. Krause was not told that the accessory build cou of be placed in front of the house. Mr. Rafferty asked if a concern is " e establishment of a precedent for future similar requests. Chair Schaps stated that is a concern. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the request of Steve Kraus for a variance to allow the construction of a 40' x 40' (1,600 sq. ft.) detached garage in front of his home at 8025 Wood Duck Trail, with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are obtained prior to any construction. 2. The accessory building is located 50' from the current front property line on Wood Duck Trail. The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. Since City Engineer Powell was not available, staff requested that Item D be considered next. Item C will be considered when Mr. Powell is available. Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 8 D. PUBLIC HEARING, (Continuation), Twin City Fabrication, 295 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit Chair Schaps declared the public hearing reopened at 7:47 p.m. Staff presented the application by Twin City Fab, Inc. for Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit for construction of a metal fabricating business in the private Apollo Business Center. Some outdoor storage on a limited basis will be needed which requires a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning & Zoning Board considered the project at the July 12, 2000 meeting and continued the public hearing for the CUP. The applicant has submitted a revised grading and utility plan. Staff reviewed their analysis of the building and site issues and noted the requirements that must be met to consider a Conditional Use Permit. Staff recommends approval subject to the 11 conditions as outlined in the staff report. Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he or his engineer would like to make comment. Gary Nordness, representing the applicant, stated the Y'gree with staff's recommendations and the engineering plan submi a� includes curb and gutter. He stated they would like to discuss the Environme Bo recommendation for prairie grass in the natural areas. He stated they are esting this recommendation but would like consideration of what they sub at about 20% a year and it is expected an the City does not have a formal ordinr e the applicant is requesting manicu applicant is environmentally consc grass. Mr. Nordness stated st process, which they greatly 'ttes4;. explained this company is growing ill be needed in the future. Since ing prairie grass in the industrial areas, ront of the building. He stated the as dedicated the entire rear area as prairie very cooperative in working through this Mr. Smyser stated Apollo Drive c rrently contains manicured lawns but the Environmental Board has recommended some native prairie plantings on these two sites. He advised that staff is recommending approval of the plan as submitted. Mr. Nordness estimated the area of manicured lawn to be approximately 15 feet in width. Upon inquiry, he reviewed the status of the surrounding properties. Mr. Corson asked why prairie grass is being recommended rather than flowering species. Mr. Smyser stated the Environmental Specialist and Environmental Board have considered this plan and that is their recommendation. Mr. Corson reviewed the problems experienced with a Vadnais Heights property due to the need to burn off the plantings every several years. Cliff Reeder stated the first time he came to City Hall, he questioned when the landscaping would be completed. He stated he is spending a lot of money on this building and many of their customers come to the site on a daily basis so he would prefer to have a manicured appearing front lawn. Mr. Reeder stated his concern with the Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 9 management of native prairie plantings since the City has not presented a clear plan in that regard. Mr. Nordness stated the front lawn area will be irrigated and the landscape architect and Environmental Specialist have recommended that the area of natural plantings not be irrigated. Ms. Lane noted staff's recommendation does not refer to a requirement for prairie grass. Mr. Smyser advised that the planting schedule is listed on the landscape plan. Ms. Lane stated her agreement that a native front lawn would not fit well with an industrial area. Mr. Schilling asked if galvanizing will occur on this site. Mr. Reeder stated they do no finishing in their building. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:05 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 6 -0. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve application b win City Fab, Inc. for Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Peimit for construct metal fabricating business in the private Apollo Business Center, based on the r ale c. ined in the staff report and with the following conditions: 1. A shared driveway agreement for for review and approval by th 2. An 8' chain link fence shal and west sides of the fence 3. Approval of the site p o Apollo Drive must be submitted neer and recorded with the County. storage area and ivy planted on the east g_sea. itional use permit is not an implied approval of signage. All signs ri_ permit and must comply with the sign ordinance. 4. • Twenty -nine (29) parka s shall be constructed as shown on the site plan, with additional area availa e as shown as "proof of parking" on the site plan. If the City determines parking is a problem, the property owner shall construct additional parking. 5. The paved truck maneuvering area shall have curb around the perimeter. 6. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to grading. 7. Final utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer. 8. The City Engineer's concerns, included in the TKDA memo of July 29, 2000, must be addressed to his satisfaction. 9. Park dedication shall be paid per City policy. 10. Any additions to the building will require a new site plan review and, possibly, an amendment to the storage CUP. 11. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. Fire suppression sprinklers are required. 12. Removal of the requirement for native plantings on the Apollo Drive frontage. Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 10 The motion was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 6 -0. C. PUBLIC HEARING, (Continued) Gary Uhde, Apollo Business Center, Conditional Use Permit — Dirt Stockpile Chair Schaps declared the public hearing reopened at 8:09 p.m. Staff explained the project was originally considered by the Planning and Zoning Board on July 12, 2000, but the Public Hearing was continued. Since that time, the applicant has submitted additional detail and revised plans for the City's consideration. Staff presented the request of G.M. Development (Gary Uhde) for a Conditional Use Permit to develop an area known as the Apollo Business Center located east of Jon Avenue, between the 74th Street alignment and I -35W. It was noted that in order to provide fill to be sold to the Apollo Drive contractor, borrow pits were created in the Apollo Business Center. It was expected these pits would be later utilized as storm water pond sites. In order to modify the location of the excavations, and to provide fill for the proposed building sites on Parcels D and E, the developer expects to move in excess of 80,000 cubic yards of material. Section 12B of the City's Z g Ordinance states "When five thousand (5,000) or more cubic yards of material i emoved or deposited on any lot or parcel, a Conditional Use Permit shall be re presented their analysis of the request and recommended approval subje seven conditions outlined in the staff report. Chair Schaps asked the applicant if h hi ineer would like to make comment. John Johnson, representing the ap. `'!" '`, ained that Mr. Uhde is out of town and not able to attend. He thanked st ork on this application and advised that requirement for rock or wo • fps s now included on their plans. He reported that three more people have expres = =rest in this development so he expects to be returning with those requests in th= near future. Robert King, 198 Marvey Street, stated he lives adjacent to this site, on the west side. He stated his concern to maintain the berm strip that was discussed years ago when this was first zoned and that trees be planted on either side of the berm, not just on top of the berm, and that it be maintained. Mr. Johnson stated they were required to berm and screen the single family homes to the west and landscaping would be implemented as part of the site plan as the parcels develop, not at this time. However, they would put the earthen berm in place at this time. He reported that the Environmental Board recommended, after much discussion, that landscaping would be a better solution than a berm. However, the applicant does not think that would adequately screen headlights. Mr. King stated his main issue is to assure the berm is installed to prevent vehicle headlights from shining onto his property. Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 11 Mr. Powell stated the trees and landscaping of the berm is beyond the scope of the Conditional Use Permit under consideration. However, that can be addressed during consideration of the individual site plans. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:19 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. Ms. Lane asked about the comment of Mr. Johnson pertaining to rock and woodchips. Mr. Powell stated the City received a submittal after the meeting information had been sent so that condition may have been satisfied. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the request of G.M. Development (Gary Uhde) for a Conditional Use Permit to develop an area known as the Apollo Business Center located east of Jon Avenue, between the 74th Street alignment and I -35W, with the following conditions: 1. A rock construction entrance must be included for erosion control. Location and a detail are needed. 2. The permit must be acquired from the Ric Watershed District. 3. Any grading activity, including any hau ' of m ials, is restricted to the City's allowed working hours as follows: Monday- Friday 7:0 . to 7:00 p.m. Saturday . to 5:00 p.m. Sundays/Holidays working hours allowed 4. Provide a schedule, includi' . e e n dates, for proposed grading. Interim completion dates can be us e development sites. 5. A Letter of Credit wil running to the City equal to 150% of the construction cost. 6. An escrow deposit to r e the City for the cost of periodic site visits would be required. 7. Any work in the right -of -way requires approval from Anoka County. The motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 -0. D. PUBLIC HEARING, (Continuation), Twin City Fabrication, 295 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit This item was considered earlier in the meeting. E. PUBLIC HEARING, (Continuation) Marmon Keystone, 265 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit Chair Schaps declared the public hearing reopened at 8:23 p.m. Staff presented the application by Marmon Keystone for Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit. The Planning & Zoning Board considered the project at the July 12, 2000 meeting and continued the public hearing for the CUP. The business processes Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 12 metal pipe and tubing. Some outdoor storage of pipe, tubing and other material will be needed, which requires a conditional us permit. Staff presented their analysis of the application and findings required for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit. Staff recommended approval subject to the 12 conditions as outlined in the staff report. Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he or his engineer would like to make comment. John Johnson, representing the applicant, stated they have one issue related to the requirement for prairie grass. He presented the site plan, noting there is less impervious surface on this site but it is used for infiltration basins on either side of the buildings. Mr. Johnson stated the applicant's concern is how to maintain prairie grass alongside of the building since it cannot be burned off. However, the applicant is willing to maintain prairie grass in the rear ponding area. Paul Knowlan, construction manager for the project, reviewed the area alongside the building and abutting Apollo Drive which will be sodded and maintained. He stated a landscape plan was submitted which identifies significant plantings along the roadways, that will be truck irrigated the first year. Chair Schaps asked what this applicant does. ow stated Marmon Keystone is a pipe distributor and is currently located in Lit da in 30,000 square feet. Mr. Rafferty inquired regarding the propo sir storage and how it will be screened. Mr. Johnson stated the storage area w be t 0,000 square feet, considerably less than would be allowed, and would, d th chain link and planted with ivy to provide screening. Ms. Lane asked where the n e pl ings would be located. Mr. Johnson pointed out areas behind the driveway and °�o the erosion control along the pond bank. Mr. Rafferty stated his concern is that a smaller manicured area is being proposed for irrigation but the larger manicured area is not being proposed for irrigation. He stated his concern that the un- irrigated area will not be properly maintained if irrigation is not being installed. In this case, he suggested that prairie plantings may be a better option since it is not being irrigated. Mr. Knowlan asked about the difference in appearance of native prairie grass and a manicured lawn area He stated they would use a grass mix that is conducive to the soils present. Chair Schaps asked if the proposal is to use a thick bladed grass. Mr. Knowlan stated they are working with City staff to assure the right grass type is selected and will till and incorporate black dirt into the top soil. Mr. Johnson stated they will be looking for a drought tolerant grass seed which may go dormant but not die. He stated the applicant's concern is how to maintain a prairie grass planting if it cannot be properly burned off. Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 13 Chair Schaps noted the great variety and number of trees being proposed, which are expensive varieties. Mr. Schilling concurred and noted this plan proposes more extensive plantings which may offset the concern of aesthetics. Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:39 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the application by Marmon Keystone for Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit, with the following conditions: 1. A shared driveway agreement for the access to Apollo Drive must be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and recorded with the County. 2. Approval of the site plan and Conditional Use Permit is not an implied approval of signage. All signs require a sign permit and must comply with the sign ordinance. 3. Twenty -nine (29) parking stalls shall be co d as shown on the site plan, with additional area available as shown futur king if required" on the site plan. If the City determines parking t em, the property owner shall construct additional parking. 4. The recycling bin must be screene n of screening must be submitted for staff review before City Coun ap • 1. 5. Shoebox lighting fixtures s � e An additional fixture shall be added to light the western portion o o e area 6. The paved truck mane s< shall have curb around the perimeter. 7. Outdoor storage rac t be railroad ties or creosote - treated or penta- treated wood. 8. The City Engineer's conce s, included in the TKDA memo of July 28, 2000, must be addressed to his satisfaction. 9. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to grading. 10. Final utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer. 11. Park dedication shall be paid per City policy. 12. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. Fire suppression sprinklers are required. 13. Removal of the native planting requirements except for the north and east portions of the site. The motion was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 5 -1 (Corson). Mr. Corson stated his support for requiring irrigation along Apollo Drive. Planning & Zoning Board August 9, 2000 Page 14 F. PUBLIC HEARING, (Continuation) Town Center Development Standards G. PUBLIC HEARING, (Continuation) Ordinance 09 -00, Tree Preservation Ordinance These items were considered earlier in the meeting. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS None. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:43 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully submitted, Carla Wirth, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. AGENDA ITEM 7H STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 -64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions (Continue to September 25, 2000 City Council Meeting) VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote required to continue BACKGROUND: City staff continues to investigate the issues identified by the Twilight Acres Work Group. We have attached a draft of Project Update and Resident Poll No. 2 for your review. OPTIONS: 1. Continue the Public Hearing to the September 25, 2000 City Council meeting. 2. Do not adopt the assessment roll for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Addition project. 3. Adopt the assessment roll for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Addition project. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 — Continue the Public Hearing for Adoption of the Assessments for the Twilight Acres 1St and 2nd Addition project to the September 25, 2000 City Council meeting. August 22, 2000 To: Twilight Acres 1St and 2nd Addition Area Residents Re: Project Update and Resident Poll No. 2 Dear Resident: This letter is intended to summarize recent information about the project and request additional assistance (in the form of a survey) from the residents. 1. The appraisal information presented by the City Attorney to the City Council at their July 24, 2000 meeting indicated that the proposed assessment amounts are greater than the expected increase in market value of the properties. In order to proceed, the City would have to reduce the project costs and/or find additional funding sources. 2. A resident indicated they had contacted the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and received assurance there were funds available for this type of project. City staff again contacted both of these agencies and the Minnesota Department of Health regarding grant funding availability specifically to help pay assessments for connection to City utilities. We were unable to identify alternative funding sources. Many of the funding sources relate to replacement of on -site systems, low interest loans, or have income restrictions. 3. The first meeting of the Twilight Acres Work Group regarding the septic systems in the neighborhood was held August 10, 2000 with several residents, the City Administrator and myself attending. The group specifically asked that the following issues be considered: • Another survey to determine the level of the resident's willingness to pay for this project. • Placing the project on the ballot this Fall for consideration. • Making a specific funding request to an agency other than the City. • Modifying the project to include alternative means of providing utility service. 4. The City Attorney has determined the 60 -day time period for property owners to prohibit the project has ended. The 60 -day time period began after the improvement hearing held in November of 1999. The public hearing that the City Council is currently holding is the special assessment hearing. The City Council has continued the public hearing and has not made a decision regarding the assessments for this project. The City Council has directed City staff to send out another survey to poll the affected property owners regarding specific details related to project costs. Please complete the attached poll form and return it to the City at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please call me at 651- 982 -2430. Sincerely, John M. Powell, P.E. City Engineer CITY OF LINO LAKES TWILIGHT ACRES 1sT AND 2ND ADDITION PROJECT RESIDENT POLL NO. 2 Name: Street Address: No. 1: How much are you willing to pay in assessments to have City water provided to your property? No. 2: How much are you willing to pay in assessments to have City sanitary sewer provided to your property? No. 3: Are you completely opposed to this project, regardless of the cost? No. 4: Does your current on -site septic system meet code? No. 5: Is your current on -site septic system failing? No. 6: How often do you pump your on -site system? No. 7: If you have had your well replaced, when did that occur? Additional Comments: When complete, please return to the City in the enclosed envelope. Thank you again for your assistance. AGENDA ITEM 7 I STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C.C. MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: Final Plat, Bluebill Ponds CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The City Council approved the preliminary plat for Bluebill Ponds on July 10, 2000. The submitted final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. The conditions of approval will be covered by plan revisions or the development agreement. The City Attorney has reviewed the title commitment. A development agreement has been prepared, including financial securities. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plat. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 OAK ^M / ' KNOLL . r� I' 1 1 ADDITION N00•30'443E 0 H N tiY (` T AMOK \ COUNTY FRIGHT-OF-WAY C:..s3&H NO. ;4 S89'28'33"E 932.03 (MAN STREET) 33.00-1; C,S.A.H. NO. 14 S89'28'33"E 932.02 (MAIN STREET) 1.71' b� z" BLUEBILL PONDS THE NORTH IJNE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF — BECHON 0. TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22. ANOKA COUNTY (5'7;00'31'27"W -- 34'-S00'31'27"W 33.01.16 0 - -• PARCEL cc cEcTccD�•1NC. - - --- S89.28'33"E A- 0+'3634- 47.33 'I SWEEIrE i3690 I � I 932.01 EXCEPTION 30 PARC�i Flun 1$ 13 1$ /1 N0. -I 31 II `— EXCEPTION PARCEL NO. 30 30 51131 1__49.09__L1-1109_1 L.a>J SNi'7SSTE e86.46 1— l6 - 4 el 4 3i 2 8 8 IPA 2 30 30 S89'28'33"E 390.92 N 114 CORNER SEC.0. ,- —TIER 31, ROE 2; MONA COUNTY con o %o -OAS OUTLOT A 333.2373E 350.48 \•c. 20 \ \"N' /4 I Ir 13 1 ,aaJ a1 1 LJ i1 t. t: 1•4 TZ I 5 4 ee E� Ntq'72'3rEr -- 73211 3010 __. 127 014 4, M A i i ,• / X66 64I / = /IS 5 I I a taaa6 _hid a93a_J / 8 g1 16 �1- 446 // ,sJ '2k/ 7 4 < QO 64.40 J b u 3e,,,471m t NEMENFW 10 $^1 'a ae ° fal 12130 —j P1 1w 12 I$ 1- ryl1 L1,14 J E16r se -°a_J ARLO 1322.10 N89•27'24"W 959.2774E 41 If I�0•�"h�d�.�l R 1 30 30 —" !E "DT 88 53 2 >E O r +42Aa v 8 4 L R o-1 Ia 9 81 1 L_ mac J 77600 LANE 30 147.42 LEA r 1 ; 3P L - -J 17237 a - r� H I G H L A N D 'I .11 1 1111 `• li E I 100 0 200 300 SCALE IN FEET DRAINAGE AND UTVTY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS I I BEND 3 PEET P1 WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, MD 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AND REAR LOT UNES UNMET OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. ALL MONUMENTS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES, AHD NOT SHOWN ON THIS RAT, WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OP THE RECORONO DATE OF 1115 PLAT, MD MALL BE EIAOENCED BY A 1/2 INCH BY 14 NCH IRON PPE MARKED BY RL419035. 0 DENOTES 1D 51011 BY 14 NCH/ IRON PPE BET, MARKED 8Y UCENBE NUMBER 19006, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. • DENOTES 112 00H BY 14 NCH IRON PIPE FOUND TIE NORTH LSE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 0. TOWNSHP 31, RANGE 22. ANOKA COUNTY, HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING OF 50r2833 6. VICINITY MAP O sru.E I -- - / N br N �.� I 1� t � 1 NW SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 21, RANGE 22 RECEIVED AUG CITY OF 1 6 2000 LINO LAKES 111) ROBE G 0 ER PLANNERS 3W as EN COMPANY, INC. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS AGENDA ITEM 7J STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Main Street Trunk Utilities VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote required to close the hearing BACKGROUND: This feasibility report was prepared in response to a petition from the Bluebill Ponds subdivision. The Main Street Trunk Utilities project involves the extension of trunk sanitary sewer and watermain along Main Street from just west of Nancy Drive to Wood Duck Trail to serve Bluebill Ponds. On July 24, 2000, the City Council received the feasibility report for this project and set a date for a Public Hearing. The only change to the feasibility report is the schedule that has been revised to reflect Spring, 2001 construction. A copy of the revised schedule is attached. I will present the information contained in the feasibility report at the Public Hearing. OPTIONS: 1. Close the public hearing. 2. Continue the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 - Staff recommends closing the public hearing. Project Timetable Main Street Trunk Utility Improvements City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA Commission No. 12100 -01 A preliminary timetable is as follows: 1. City Council Orders Feasibility Report (Res. 00 -33) 2. City Council Receives Feasibility Report and Orders Public Hearing on Proposed Improvements 4. Council Holds Public Hearing 5. City Council Orders the Improvement, Preparation of Plans and Specifications, and Declares Intent to Bond 6. Engineer Submits Plans for Council Approval and Receives Authorization to Advertise for Bids 7. 8. 9. Advertise in Official Newspaper (Quad Communities) Advertise in Construction Bulletin Open Bids 10. City Council Awards Contract 11. Contractor Begins Construction 12. Contractor Completes Construction Revised August 23, 2000 June 12, 2000 July 24, 2000 August 28, 2000 August 28, 2000 October 9, 2000 October 17, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 13, 2000 October 20, 2000 November 7, 2000 November 13, 2000 Spring, 2001 Fall, 2001 AGENDA ITEM 7K STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 28, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -77, Order the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Main Street Trunk Utilities VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: After the Public Hearing for is held, the next step in the Public Improvement Process is to order the improvement and preparation of the plans and specifications. This project was initiated by a petition from the Bluebill Ponds subdivision which is the benefited property proposed to be assessed. The petitioners have also waived 50 days of the 60 day waiting period. Therefore, per Section 8.06 of the City Charter, the City Council may immediately order the proposed project. The plans and specifications would be received by the City Council at the October 9, 2000, meeting. Construction will take place in the Spring of 2001. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 -77, order the improvement and preparation of plans and specifications for the Main Street Trunk Utilities project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Adopt Resolution No. 00 -77, order the improvement and preparation of plans and specifications for the Main Street Trunk Utilities project. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -77 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS — MAIN STREET TRUNK UTILITIES WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 24th day of July, 2000, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvement of Main Street by constructing trunk sanitary sewer and watermain. WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held earlier this evening, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer, John Powell, is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 28th day of August, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 28, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 7L STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: TOPIC: 8/28/00 Economic Development Advisory Committee economic development plan Vote required: Simple majority BACKGROUND: The Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC), has as its directive to help the city council encourage growth of new and existing business. EDAC has revisited its original long range economic development plan that was completed five years ago. The committee examined what was still relevant and what needed to be updated and redirected to ensure that the plan continued to support the goals of the city. The five -year plan is intended to be a guide for economic development that acknowledges that some goals and priorities will change over time. The plan is accompanied by an action plan that EDAC updates annually. Some of the major goals and objectives from the plan, designed to minimize the residential tax burden by raising the commercial /industrial tax base, include: • Higher priority given to commercial development of the Town Center and its relationship to residential growth; recommending the city consider itself an active participant in the development of the Town Center and invest in a higher standard of development that will ultimately bring higher values and increased tax base. • Identifying new opportunities within the draft Comprehensive Plan for commercial /industrial growth • Prioritizing economic development efforts to ensure that the city's commitment to infrastructure, staff time and incentives produces the highest possible results • Revisiting zoning ordinances to reflect the changing quality of commercial and industrial development in the City • Establishing a long range improvement plan to redevelop blighted or substandard areas As a part of implementing this plan, EDAC recently voted to endorse the Town Center standards with the understanding that the city council may revise specific requirements in the standards before they become a part of the city's zoning ordinances. EDAC also recommended revisions to the city's Tax Increment Financing policy to reduce the city's reliance on TIF to attract new industrial business, while still providing the city the opportunity to assist quality businesses in relocating to Lino Lakes. OPTIONS: 1. Endorse the five -year economic development plan as presented by the Economic Development Authority Advisory Committee 2. Return to EDAC for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 DRAFT CITY OF LINO LAKES FIVE YEAR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN A. BACKGROUND In 1992 the City of Lino Lakes adopted an Economic Development Plan and established the Economic Development Authority Advisory Board (EDAAB). Its mission was to 1) actively promote the development of quality commercial, retail and light industrial businesses within the City of Lino Lakes, and 2) maintain and encourage the growth of existing businesses within the City of Lino Lakes. In 1994 the city expanded EDAAB to provide broader community participation. In 1998 EDAAB changed its name to the Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) to reflect its status as a volunteer advisory group rather than an official board required by state statute, but its mission remains the same. EDAC established 10 goals within the original economic development plan, and each year has updated its goals within its one -year action plan. To date, the five years of action plans have resulted in the location of 32 businesses in the 22 building projects with an additional market value of approximately $28 million. This five -year strategic economic development plan revisits and revises those original goals to reflect the efforts accomplished since 1992, changing needs of the community and new development options. B. INVENTORY Lino Lakes is a city covering an area of approximately 33 square miles located in the northeast part of the Tvvin Cities metropolitan area. A high amenity community, the current population of Lino Lakes is approximately 15,500. In the central part of the city, the Rice Creek Chain -of -Lakes Regional Park preserves 2,550 acres of lakes, shore land, and rolling topography in an unique natural environment. In addition, there are 13 lakes and extensive areas of wetlands. The lakes, wooded area, and parks will preserve natural habitat as population growth continues. There will be a feeling of a rural community in Lino Lakes even though the city's population is expected to reach 20,500 by the year 2020. 1 Under the draft comprehensive plan, the city has approximately 600 acres of land zoned for commercial, 550 zoned for light industrial, and another 900 acres designated for future commercial /industrial development in the Rural Business Reserve. Light Industrial The Apollo Business Park on 35W is a light industrial park initiated by the city when it purchased 36 acres of undeveloped area in 1990. Light industrial development includes office/warehouse, manufacturing, and wholesale distribution facilities. A public - private partnership was established with an adjacent land developer to develop a 100 -acre park. A nine -ton county road and full utilities are completed in the park. The city began actively marketing the park in 1993. To date, a total of 15 new buildings have been constructed or are in the approvals process, totaling more than $13 million in market value. These facilities will eventually generate more than one -half million dollars in additional tax revenue. The city sold all its property to business developers one year before its contract for deed came due and realized a substantial profit on the land. Approximately 20 acres of land owned by the private developer remains. The remaining land, when developed, could generate in the range of $8 million in additional market value and another $375,000 in annual taxes. While this remaining property has been slow to develop, it is in a TIF district that has potentially eight years remaining. All the projects in Apollo Park have received tax increment financing assistance. Several are now on the tax rolls, with the remaining built facilities coming on between 2002 and 2008. The light industrial business park called Clearwater Creek Development Center, located on 35E, has three new businesses since 1995 totaling more than $10 million in market value, and will generate close to another one -half million dollars in property taxes. This park has tremendous potential for future business development. A nine -ton county road is now complete, opening the center of the park for development. Trunk utilities have been installed. A development partnership has purchased much of the remaining property and has a concept plan calling for approximately $30 million in additional market value, generating $1.2 million in annual taxes. This development is likely to take three to 10 years to full development. The new Lakes Business Park on Lake Drive will begin development in 2000. This 60 -acre park provides additional potential for new light industrial business in Lino Lakes. This park does not have interior roads or utilities available and would be developer initiated. The concept plan by Glenn Rehbein Companies shows 335,000 square feet at total buildout. This has the potential to generate in the range of $12 million in market value and one -half million dollars in annual taxes. This property is in an economic development TIF district, with eight years remaining. 2 Commercial In recent years the city has turned its focus to the development of commercial business in the Town Center in Lino Lakes. Commercial development refers to any nonindustrial development that is taxed at a C/I tax rate, i.e., professional offices, service businesses, entertainment, and retail. Retail development refers to that which provides consumer goods at retail prices (See Definitions; Attachment A). With population growth, the city is beginning to attract commercial developers to the commercial areas on 35W and 35E. The Town Center on 35W is the primary commercial area that has been designated as the future "downtown" Lino Lakes. Extensive planning since 1995, plus the city's purchase of land within one quadrant of the Town Center, has provided the momentum for development. Based on a concept of Traditional Neighborhood Development, the emphasis is on high density, mixed use that responds to pedestrians as well as the automobile. This "Main Street" concept has been gaining acceptance throughout the country as an alternative to standard suburban development catering to big box retail and oriented to the automobile. To date, two banks, two clinics, a convenience store /gas station, the Lino Lakes Civic Complex and a planned McDonald's have developed in the Town Center. A YMCA is slated for development in 2001. In addition, the four quadrants of 35E are beginning to attract development interest. One gas station /convenience store /restaurant has opened on the southwest quadrant and a Dairy Queen is planned. A bank is scheduled for construction on the southeast quadrant, opening up the area for additional commercial growth. With the increase in new residential development in east Lino Lakes, Hugo and Centerville, this interchange is likely to see significant development in three to five years. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN It was the intent of EDAC to incorporate the Lino Lakes draft Comprehensive Plan objectives for commercial and industrial land into the Economic Development Plan. This includes an aggressive economic development growth strategy that recognizes the relationship between housing growth and commercial /industrial growth and the need for diversity in housing. EDAC supports the draft Comprehensive Plan's assumptions that: • 17% of the future growth in Lino Lakes will be commercial /Industrial • 26% of future housing will be multi - family • 50% of multi - family housing will be rental • Commercial /industrial market valuation shall increase by an average of $8 million per year. • The commercial /industrial market valuation goal is 7% by 2005; 10% by 2010; and 15% by 2020. • The local tax rate goal is 20% by 2020. 3 D. GOALS /OBJECTIVES GOAL ONE Minimize the residential tax burden by raising the commercial /retail/ industrial tax bases. 1. OBJECTIVE Develop an Economic Development Plan for the City of Lino Lakes through 2005 that corresponds to the draft Comprehensive Plan's commercial /industrial objectives. 2. OBJECTIVE Annually update a one -year Action Plan component of the Five -Year Economic Development Plan. 3. OBJECTIVE Identify opportunities within the draft Comprehensive Plan for future commercial and industrial growth and initiate planning procedures to manage future growth for the betterment of the community. 4 GOAL TWO Continue a strong and innovative pattern for the growth of quality economic development within the City of Lino Lakes. 1. OBJECTIVE Continue an active economic development process to discover new business opportunities. 2. OBJECTIVE Focus city financial and professional staff resources to enable Lino Lakes to effectively pursue quality economic development opportunities within a competitive business environment. 3. OBJECTIVE Prioritize economic development efforts to ensure that the city's financial commitment in infrastructure, staff time and incentives produces the strongest commercial /industrial tax base, widest range of goods and services and high quality development that will meet the needs of future generations. 4. OBJECTIVE Support the growth and well being of existing businesses in Lino Lakes. 5. OBJECTIVE Continue the effort to maintain an area wide reputation for being receptive and responsive to new quality economic development. 5 POLICY RECOMMENDATION: Recognizing the strong regional competition for commercial development, aggressively pursue financial options to promote the development of the Town Center as the highest priority commercial site in the city. (See Financial Tools; Attachment B) GOAL THREE Provide continuous and effective coordination and facilitation of the economic development process. 1. OBJECTIVE Work in coordination with planning, engineering, finance and environment to provide comprehensive departmental procedures for effective and orderly strategies to enable potential new businesses to come to Lino Lakes. 2. OBJECTIVE Develop comprehensive zoning ordinances that reflect the changing quality of commercial and industrial development in the city. 3. OBJECTIVE Identify changing opportunities and constraints and adapt the city's criteria for prospect selection to achieve the highest quality commercial and industrial development possible. 7 GOAL FOUR Develop and implement a specifically created and appropriate conceptual theme that builds upon the already established theme of quality development and preservation of natural resources. 1. OBJECTIVE Continue to promote and pervasively make use of the Lino Lakes Symbol for all economic development promotional material and visual opportunities such as signage, brochures, etc. 2. OBJECTIVE Create a comprehensive promotional package that effectively conveys the city's objectives in creating a unique identity of a traditional neighborhood development in the Town Center. 8 GOAL FIVE Establish a long range improvement plan for the "doors" and "windows" of Lino Lakes to redevelop blighted and substandard areas. 1. OBJECTIVE Attract new businesses that are complementary to existing businesses and residential areas, and will contribute to the customer attraction and business interchange of local commercial areas. 2. OBJECTIVE Develop an overall architectural character that is distinct to Lino Lakes and establish criteria for prospective businesses to incorporate features in building design, signage and landscaping that will provide a consistent architectural and environmental flavor that is "uniquely' Lino Lakes. 3. OBJECTIVE Commit city financial and staff resources to the redevelopment of commercial and industrial properties. 9 4. OBJECTIVE Ensure that commercial areas surrounded by residential land uses are designed to compatibly coexist, creating a physical sense of neighborhood and an interrelationship between the two land uses. 10 GOAL SIX Protect and enhance the unique natural environment of Lino Lakes as a sustainable community resource. 1. OBJECTIVE Incorporate the city's Environmental Management Plan into the project process to ensure commercial /industrial development meets the objective of the plan. 2. OBJECTIVE Review and evaluate every economic development opportunity with respect to the ecological impact. 3. OBJECTIVE Maximize the inherent attractiveness of the physical surroundings of each new economic development project. ATTACHMENT A DEFINITIONS 1. BUSINESS DISTRICTS Neighborhood Business (NB): Local businesses for convenience, limited office, retail or service outlets which deal directly with the daily requirements of the immediate neighborhood and which are located along a collector or arterial artery. They are not intended to draw customers from the entire community. Limited Business (LB): Areas suitable only for commercial uses of a limited (less intense) nature. This may be due to proximity of residential uses. This may include high quality commercial such as an office park. Can be used as transitional buffer between intense commercial (GB) and residential uses. General Business (GB): Contains a wide variety of business uses including retail, service and semi - industrial uses. They may contain businesses, which tend to serve other business or industry as well as those catering to shopper's needs. Central Business District (CB): Reserved to promote expansion and redevelopment projects for modern retail shopping facilities of integrated design in central business locations. Shopping Center (SC): Reserved for modern retail shopping facilities of integrated design. Light Industrial (LI): Uses include service industries and industries which manufacture, fabricate, assemble or store, where the process is not likely to create offensive noise, vibrations, dust, heat, smoke, odor, glare or other objectionable influences. Generally, these include wholesale, service and Tight industries which are dependent upon raw materials refined elsewhere. General Industrial (GI): These are areas which, because of availability to thoroughfares, suitable topography, and isolation, are appropriate for industrial uses of a more intense nature and ones which may have certain nuisance characteristics. (There is no undeveloped GI land remaining in Lino Lakes). (It is understood that these zoning definitions will change upon adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and review of zoning ordinances) 11 Attachment B ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE TOOLS 1. Tax Increment Financing The goal of Tax Increment Financing is to provide the private sector with short-term incentives and long -term financing to stimulate needed development and redevelopment of a community. The basic concept behind tax increment financing is to use the new tax revenues generated by a completed development to pay for certain development costs, such as land acquisition and site improvements. The differences between the taxes before development and the increased taxes after development are referred to as the "tax increment." The Legislature created five major types of TIF districts: 1. Redevelopment - Consists of a project or portions of a project that contains blighted structures or conditions that require public activity for redevelopment to occur. Tax increments can be collected from redevelopment districts for 25 years from receipt of the first increment. 2. Renewal and Renovation - Similar to a redevelopment district except that the specific blighted conditions that must be present to establish it are less stringent. For this reason the duration of this district is shorter at 15 years. 3. Economic Development - Consists of a commercial or industrial development which will increase employment, enhance or preserve the city's tax base, and discourage industry from moving to another city or state. An economic development district can collect increment for the earlier of nine years after the receipt of the first increment or 10 years from approval of the TIF plan. 4. Housing - Consists of a project intended for occupancy, in part, by persons of low or moderate income. Increments can be collected for 25 years after the receipt of the first increment. 5. Soils Condition District - Requires that 80 percent of the acreage in the district require substantial physical preparation or environmental remediation for use. Tax increments can be collected for up to 12 years after approval of the plan. 2. Tax Abatement Cities, counties and school districts have been given authority to rebate the taxes imposed by that entity, but not taxes of any other jurisdiction. This incentive can be used for new commercial greenfield development, while TIF cannot. An abatement may last up to 10 years. The total abatements in any year may not exceed 5 percent of the current levy or $100,000, whichever is greater. Abatements cannot be from the tax attributable to the value of the land, only from the improvements. Proceeds may be used for: a. public improvements b. acquiring or conveying land c. cost of improvements made to the property d. Costs of issuance of bonds. 3. Land write down The city can write down the cost of land it owns to a developer for the purpose of creating economic development. However, this —as well as any other incentive discussed here —is a business subsidy and subject to all provisions of the Business Subsidy Law. 4. Deferred Assessments The city has deferred public improvements until development in the Apollo Business Park and on the Tagg property. 5. Removal of development fees The city has the option of removing fees such as site and building plan review, building permit fees and park dedication fees. 6. Grant funding for Livable Communities The city received $220,000 in 1998 for the completion of a master plan and development standards in the Town Center. With that complete, the city intends to apply for 2000 funding for implementation of the master plan. A total of $6.9 million is available this year. This money can be used to cover the gap that may exist between conventional suburban development and Traditional Neighborhood Development. Applications are due in August. ATTACHMENT C SAMPLE OF INVENTORY TO BE COMPLETED BY EDAC 1. THE VILLAGE (SW QUADRANT OF 35W/LAKE DRIVE OWNER/S: CITY ARCTIC SANDBLASTING/TAGGS ACRES AVAILABLE: CITY: 12 TAGGS: 29 ZONING/LAND USE: GB (WILL BECOME PART OF PDO) SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE: ROADS UTILITIES OPPORTUNITIES: CONSTRAINTS: 1. 35W/LAKE DRIVE 2. LAND AVAILABLE 3. MOTIVATED SELLERS 4. MASTER PLANNED 5. DESIGN STANDARDS 6. ADJACENT TO PARK 1. DEVELOPER RESISTANCE TO DESIGN STANDARDS 2. LAND COSTS 3. COMPETITION INCENTIVES AVAILABLE: BEST USE: - MIXED USE - HIGH DENSITY - PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED 2. SHOPPING CENTER OWNERS: ACRES AVAILABLE: ZONING/LAND USE: GLENN REHBEIN TIM BAYLOR/MDT DEVELOPMENT REHBEIN: 40 BAYLOR: 10 SC (WILL BECOME PART OF PDO) SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE: ROADS UTILITIES OPPORTUNITIES: CONSTRAINTS: 1. 3 5W/LAKE DRIVE 2. LAND AVAILABLE 3. MOTIVATED SELLERS 4. MASTER PLANNED 5. DESIGN STANDARDS 1. DEVELOPER RESISTANCE TO DESIGN STANDARDS 2. LAND COSTS 3. COMPETITION INCENTIVES AVAILABLE: BEST USE: 1. MIXED USE 2. HIGH DENSITY 3. MAJOR RETAIL/COMMERCIAL 4. PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Attachment D MEMORANDUM File Brian Wessel January 25, 2000 TIF PROPOSAL POLICY - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DRAFT The following is standard policy for use of tax increment financing in Lino Lakes: 1. The prospect must qualify according to the Economic Development selection criteria. 2. A TIF commitment will be made to a project for the following qualified site improvement expenses: a. Special assessments b. Land write down c. Administrative fees 3. A land write down commitment will be based on a minimum of 10,000 square feet of building per one acre of land. 4. Each project will be self sufficient within the allowable TIF capacity. 5. TIF commitments are not to exceed 16% of the minimum market value unless the scope of the economic development benefit is significant and City Council (EDA) approves it. 6. Administrative fees (upfront escrow) will be reimbursed upon the completion of the building. 7. In the Apollo Business Park assessments can be on an upfront basis. 8. In other TIF Districts, assessments and land write down will be on a pay -as- you -go basis. 9. The city will be reimbursed first for upfront costs from available increment, after which the grantee will receive the pay -as- you -go portion of the subsidy. ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN EDAC, JANUARY 2000 A. TEAM 1. Economic Development Authority Mayor John Bergeson Council member Donna Carlson Council member Caroline Dahl Council member Jeff O'Donnell Council member Jeff Reinert 2. Economic Development Advisory Committee Fred Chase, Chairman Don Gorowsky, Vice Chairman Julie Jeffrey - Schwartz Roger Jensen Howard Juni John Milbauer Glenn Rehbein Mai Haselman Bill Johnson, Planning & Zoning Liaison 3. Community Development Staff Brian Wessel, Community Development Director Mary Alice Divine, Economic Development Assistant Jeff Smyser, City Planner Mary Kay Wyland, Planning Coordinator John Powell, City Engineer Marty Asleson, Environmental Coordinator 4. Consultants Ehlers & Associates Kennedy & Graven Calthorpe Associates Advance Resources for Development, Inc. 1 B. PROJECTS 1. Apollo Business Park 2. I -35E Planned Development 3. Town Center Development 4. Lake Drive Development 5. Birch Street/Hodgson Road 6. Lakes Business Park C. PROGRAMS 1. Planning /economic development 2. Local Business Retention 3. Lino Lakes Promotional Program 4. Prospect Subsidy Evaluation D. FUTURE PROJECTS 1. Lake Drive /Main Street redevelopment 2. 49/J Redevelopment 3. 1 -35E /J Development 4. Rural Business Reserve 2 ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN PROJECTS 1. APOLLO BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT 1999 REVIEW: In 1999 the light industrial area on Apollo Drive was expanded to include six acres of land formerly owned by Hawkins Chemical. The Lino Lakes Business Center constructed Phases 5 & 6 on the site, with plans to build Phases 7 & 8 in 2000. Contract Hardware constructed a facility on the G.M. Development site and staff continued to work with prospects for further development of the remaining sites. At total of $2,788,500 in additional market value was added in 1999. Phase 3 of Apollo Drive was also completed, connecting it directly to Lake Drive. PURPOSE: Continue marketing the Apollo Business Park as a primary component of the City's economic development effort. TIME FRAME: Two years ASSIGNED TO: Community Development Director, Economic Development Assistant, EDAC members, city staff STRATEGY: 1. Facilitate the development of the G.M. Development site to expand industrial development in the privately owned portion of the park. 2. Develop a master plan and implementation plan for signage, lighting and landscaping in the business park. 3. Design and install an entrance monument to the park as part of the identity program for the city. PROJECTED RESULTS: Full development of Apollo Business Park, realizing the optimal investment potential of the City's prime industrial land. 3 2. CLEARWATER CREEK DEVELOPMENT CENTER 1999 REVIEW: Economic Development staff has worked closely with a new development partnership to facilitate growth in the industrial park and a concept plan is in place for high quality light industrial development. PURPOSE: Continue to facilitate the development of quality commercial and industrial growth in the Clearwater Creek Development Center. TIME FRAME: 2000 ASSIGNED TO: Community Development Director, Economic Development Assistant, EDAC, city staff STRATEGY: 1. Continue a productive working relationship with local landowners and jointly market land to private light industrial and commercial companies and developers. 2. Complete an analysis of local incentive potential and complete a development agreement with the development partnership in the industrial park. PROJECTED RESULTS: This program will allow the City to facilitate the orderly economic development of the eastern "door" to Lino Lakes to enhance the city's tax base. 4 3. TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT 1999 REVIEW: The Civic Complex has been completed and plans are moving forward for the construction of a YMCA beginning in the fall of 2000. McDonald's will be constructing a "retro" restaurant in the spring of 2000. Calthorpe Associates has been working with community development staff to complete a master plan and design guidelines for two quadrants of the 35W interchange. Staff is working with various developers of commercial and housing. PURPOSE: Facilitate the development of the Village as the focal point of the Town Center as "downtown" Lino Lakes based on the guiding principles established in the Master Plan, and extend applicable principles to the entire Town Center TIME FRAME: 2000 -2005 ASSIGNED TO: Community Development Director, Economic Development Assistant, EDAC, city staff STRATEGY: 1. Complete the planning process for The Town Center and facilitate the integrated development of the four quadrants of the l -35W interchange called the Town Center. 2. Complete the development framework and zoning ordinances for the Town Center based on the principles of Traditional Neighborhood Development to serve as a model for higher density development within the city. 3. Release an RFP for the purpose of jointly marketing the city owned and Tagg properties to developers. 4. Develop a marketing program in coordination with developers to inform potential new businesses of the unique opportunities available in the Town Center. 5. Continue communication with landowners and other stakeholders. 6. Sell the city -owned parcels within The Village. 5 7. Encourage high density, ownership and rental housing within the Town Center to meet the objectives of the draft Comprehensive Plan and to help ensure the success of Traditional Neighborhood Development principles. 8. Continue working in partnership with the YMCA to complete plans for the construction of a facility in The Village. PROJECTED RESULTS: The Town Center project will incorporate public facilities into a mixed -use commercial /residential development center to provide municipal services, a physical sense of identity for the City, an active, pedestrian- oriented environment, and a profitable business center. A City initiative will use new city facilities as a means to stimulate private development, increase the value of land along I -35W, enhance the City's tax base, and provide more direct control over the quality of development within the City. POLICY RECOMMENDATION: A diverse mixture of high density multi - family homes, with an 80/20 mix of market rate and affordable, and a 50/50 owner /renter mix, will be encouraged in the Town Center 6 4. LAKE DRIVE DEVELOPMENT PURPOSE: Establish an environment that favors more orderly commercial and industrial growth on Lake Drive from Hodgson Road to Main Street in Lino Lakes. TIME FRAME: 2000 -2005 ASSIGNED TO: Community Development team STRATEGY: 1. Facilitate the development of a new light industrial business park on Glenn Rehbein's property on Lake Drive. 2. Facilitate the development of the city owned parcels (3 acres) on Lake Drive. 3. Determine the most appropriate use for the city owned parcel on Lake Drive /Hodgson Road and make appropriate recommendations for zoning. Facilitate the development of the parcel. 4. Identify opportunities to consolidate site access points and promote shared driveways. 5. Identify areas for redevelopment due to existing non - conforming conditions, compatibility problems or under - utilization of the site. PROJECTED RESULTS: Development of Lake Drive from Hodgson Road to Main Street in a manner that realizes its full potential and meets the objectives for Lake Drive in the Comprehensive Plan 7 5. BIRCH STREET /HODGSON ROAD DEVELOPMENT PURPOSE: To ensure appropriate neighborhood commercial development that serves the needs of the surrounding community. TIME FRAME: 2000 - 2003 ASSIGNED TO: Economic Development staff STRATEGY: 1. Work with local developers to plan high quality mixed use development that incorporates existing uses, the Apitz farm and the Kaiser property. 2. Facilitate the sale of the Kaiser the property to an appropriate commercial developer. PROJECTED RESULTS: A high quality mixed use development that adheres to the site design guidelines established by the city 8 6. LAKE BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT PURPOSE: Facilitate the development of Glenn Rehbein's property on Lake Drive to increase the commercial /industrial tax base within the city. TIME FRAME: 2000 -2005 ASSIGNED TO: Economic Development staff STRATEGY: 1. Develop design standards to ensure a high quality light industrial development that will be part of the Town Center. 2. Continue to monitor the availability and use of tax increment financing within the business park. 3. Work with Mr. Rehbein to market the new business park to select prospects. PROJECTED RESULTS: A new Tight industrial park that will be integrated into the mixed use concept of the Town Center and will provide an additional source of tax revenue for the city. 9 ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN PROGRAMS 1. PLANNING /ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PURPOSE: To develop an integrated Community Development framework of urban design guidelines that will ensure the guiding principles of livable communities within the draft Comprehensive Plan are applied to future development in Lino Lakes 1999 REVIEW: The city is continuing to work with Calthorpe Associates to develop a framework that addresses zoning and regulations that act as barriers to development of higher density mixed uses STRATEGY: 1. Annual review of Comprehensive Plan for commercial /industrial objectives to ensure EDAC goals remain consistent with overall city goals. 2. Review city zoning and code regulations and permitting processes to address the regulatory barriers to higher density, mixed use, clustered, pedestrian oriented development. 3. Identify areas within the city to which principles and performance standards can be applied. TIME FRAME: Annual ASSIGNED TO: EDAC, Community Development Staff, Planning consultants PROJECTED RESULTS: Clear rules, consistently applied that supports the city's guiding principles for the remaining developable land in Lino Lakes 10 2. LOCAL BUSINESS RETENTION PROGRAM 1999 REVIEW On -going communications with businesses known to be considering expanding or relocating continued in 1999 to encourage growing businesses to stay in Lino Lakes. Molin Concrete completed its expansion. Staff participates in Metro North Chamber of Commerce and Lino Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce events designed to support businesses in the Quad communities. PURPOSE: To provide an atmosphere of support and recognition of local business and industry's contribution to Lino Lakes and to encourage growth within the City. TIME FRAME: Annual ASSIGNED TO: EDAC Board and Economic Development staff STRATEGY: 1. Continue initiating regular contact with businesses in Lino Lakes to develop a positive public/private relationship. 2. Evaluate the potential for moving incompatible existing businesses located within the Town Center to compatible sites within Lino Lakes. 3. Continue updating the computerized inventory of existing businesses for on -going communications. 4. Work with the local media to publicize achievements and contributions of local businesses within the community. 5. Work with the local Chambers of Commerce to provide additional support to local businesses. PROJECTED RESULTS: The program is expected to enhance communication between local businesses and the City to produce a positive business climate, support growth and retain industry within the City. Acting as a partner with local business will enhance the City's reputation for being receptive to quality economic development. 11 3. LINO LAKES PROMOTIONAL PROGRAM PURPOSE: Focus the marketing /promotional campaign to effectively define the image Lino Lakes wishes to enhance, define the target audience, and communicate that image through a variety of public relations efforts. TIME FRAME: Annual ASSIGNED TO: Community Development Director and Assistant/consultants STRATEGY: 1. Develop a marketing plan and promotional materials to effectively communicate the Town Center concept to the community, developers, the media and targeted businesses. 2. Develop along with the commercial /industrial site matrix documentary photos of land use and surrounding land use. PROJECTED RESULTS: The development of a Lino Lakes "image" as a community offering high quality housing, excellent business opportunities, good schools, and a country-like atmosphere close to the heart of the metro area. 12 4. PROSPECT SUBSIDY EVALUATION PURPOSE: Regular review and evaluation the City's financing program as part of long range economic development planning to optimize the use of tax increment financing and other funding sources. TIME FRAME: Annual ASSIGNED TO: Community Development Director /Assistant STRATEGY: 1. Prioritize the potential uses for funds generated through Tax Increment Financing. 2. Develop potential subsidy sources and policy for providing financial incentives to commercial uses within the Town Center. 4. Develop triggers for use of incentives and criteria for periodic evaluation 5. Update TIF Policy and recommend adoption by the City Council. PROJECTED RESULTS: An ongoing evaluation of current and future uses of Tax Increment Financing will promote development within the City in a manner that most effectively benefits the Commercial /Industrial tax base. Alternative subsidy sources will provide additional incentive to business and reduce the city's reliance on TIF as its only subsidy source. POLICY RECOMMENDATION: Adopt TIF policy update for 2000 (See Attachment D) 13 FUTURE PROJECTS 1. MAIN STREET /LAKE DRIVE REVITALIZATION 2. HIGHWAY 49 /COUNTY ROAD J REDEVELOPMENT 3. I -35E/COUNTY ROAD J DEVELOPMENT 4. RURAL BUSINESS RESERVE 14