Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/13/2013 P&Z Minutes APPROVED MINUTES CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES 1 . CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL : Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6 :30 p.m . on November 13 , 201 3 . 2 . A PROVAL OF AGENDA T he Agenda was a pproved as presented . 3 . A PPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 9 , 201 3 M r. Masonick made a MOTION to approve the October 9 , 2013 Meeting Minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson . Motion carried 4 - 0 . (Hyden , Root & Tralle abstained.) 4 . OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared O pen M ike at 6:30 p.m . There w as no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6 :31 p.m. M otion was supported by M r . Evenson . Motion carried 6 - 0 . (Tralle abstaine d.) D ATE : November 13 , 201 3 TIME STARTED : 6 :30 P.M . TIME ENDED : 8 :40 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Neil Evenson, Michael Hyden (Vice Chair), Perry Laden, Lou Masonick, Robert Nelson, Michael Root , Paul Tralle (Chair) MEMBERS ABSENT : None STAFF PRESENT : M ichael Grochala , Katie Larsen , Jason Wedel Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2013 Page 2 APPROVED MINUTES 5 . ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED UBLIC HEARING to consider a rezone of property located at 7880 Sunset Avenue (PID #07 -31 -22 -23 -0004) from R -Rural to PUD -Planned Unit Development and an Amendment to the Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat of Century Far m North to expand project boundary and include certain property located at 7880 Sunset Avenue K atie Larsen, City Planner, recommended continuing the Public Hearing as staff is awaiting revised plans from the applicant . Mr. Hyden made a MOTION at 6 :32 p.m. to c ontinue the Public Hearing to the next meeting. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden . Motion carried 6 - 0. (Tralle abstained.) B. PUBLIC HEARING to consider rezoning and a PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat for a 55 lot residential developm ent to be called Saddle Club, located at 1403 Birch Street, PIN 28 -31 -22 -34 -0001 K atie Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report . Ms. Larsen explained the history of the site and that a Planned Unit Development w ould allow flexibility from the nor mal requirements. Staff stated that the result of this proposed development would be similar to the neighboring Foxborough and Preserve developments. The proposed development will contain four outlots of preserved wetlands. Staff clarified that neighb oring property owners on Old Birch Street will not be assessed for utility improvements, however neighboring properties will have utilities available to them if they choose to connect in the future . Connection fees would be due if and when property connec ts to utilities. Staff explained th e proposed trail extensions and tree preservation plans for the site . Staff noted that a traffic study was completed and that modifications along Birch Street and Old Birch Street would be further analyzed . Staff int ends for the Environmental Board to review the t ree mitigation plan once it is completed. Following discussion by the board, staff noted that the east/west portion of Old Birch Street will be improved and that the city intends to work with property owner s to complete the connection to Fox Road as quickly as possible. Board member comments included the following: - Concerned about increased traffic on Birch Street. - Are there traffic calming measures that could be considered , such as medians, etc. Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2013 Page 3 APPROVED MINUTES - Th e city s hould consider requirin g a turn lane on Birch Street near the church by Old Birch Street - Connection to the Foxborough development is important as soon as possible. - Exiting Old Birch Street onto Birch Street is very difficult - The development should include sidewalks so that pedestrians are not using the street as part of a trail - Request that the item come back before the board for additional review Staff noted that they have received comments from residents and issues will be addressed with the applicant an d the county. Staff received comments from Anoka County prior to the meeting, but without time for review. Staff stated that safety issues on Birch Street are a top priority . The city will evaluate site lines and consider safety measures such as turn l anes and additional signage of advisory speeds in the area. Applicant, Mike Black, w as present on behalf of the developer. Mr. Black noted that they will work with staff to reduce some of the lot sizes in order to expand the outlot area. Mr. Black expla ined that they have been planning this project for six months and the developer has not come across any issues that they will not be able to address. Mr. Black understands the importance of the city’s trail system and is in favor of connecting trails. He expressed concern with trails that go between lots. He believes that the t rails as proposed w ould adequately address the trail conne ction. Mr. Black pointed out that due to the insignificant amount of traffic that would be at the end of the proposed cul -de -sac, a trail along the road would not be merited. He also did not agree with providing a sidewalk along Pheasant Run , noting that this would be the only development with a sidewalk along that street. Mr. Black stated that they will continue to work w ith staff to address any other concerns. C hair Tralle declared the Public Hearing open at 7 :39 p.m. Linda Dawson , 877 Fox Road, lives at the end of Fox Road. Ms. Dawson stated concern for increased traffic in the area as well as potential impact to tree s . She was concerned about the proposed road connection to Foxborough and traffic going to and from Old Birch Street. Ms. Dawson distributed a photo of the trees that c urrently exist where a future road is proposed . She was also c oncerned about the envi ronmental impact to the neighborhood. Gary F oster, 882 Old Birch Street , owns four acres adjacent to the proposed development. Mr. Foster stated concern for poor street conditions and increased t raffic issue s. He was very concerned for the lack of maint enance to Old Birch Street and that no improvements are proposed to th at road by the city. Mr. Foster expressed that neighboring property owners should have been previously informed of p lans for Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2013 Page 4 APPROVED MINUTES development. He was concerned about potential increased dam age to Old Birch Street, the difficulty to get onto Birch Street, and a decrease in property values. Mr. Foster stated that improvements are needed to reduce accidents on Birch Street, such as turn lanes. He expressed concern that the residents will be c harged to fix a road that may be damaged by development. Mr. Foster asked the board to consider the needs of the residents . Joe F eh n, 878 F ox R oad, commented that development to this area was denied in the past due to traffic, and now more houses are bei ng proposed. He wondered what is being done to improve the traffic situation. He was concerned with safety and traffic in a condensed area and access to Birch Street. Randall G raczyk, 886 Fox Road, wonder ed why the neighborhoods have to be connected . H e commented that it would be safer to have individual developments with less traffic. He does not see the need for the road extension to Fox Road. He agrees that improvements need to be made to Birch Street. Rick Capocasa, 886 Old Birch St, stated conce rn for traffic. He stated that the i ntersection at the north end of Old Birch Street is dangerous due to traffic and speed of cars. He pointed out that a light was installed at Birch /Ware to reduce accidents. He added that improvements will need to be made to reduce accidents a t the s -curve. Char Foster, 882 Old Birch Street, stated that it would be useful for residents to see the list of engineer ing concerns. Ms. Foster stated her concerns with traffic, adding that traffic n eed s to be analyzed and ad dressed . She w ould have preferred the opportunity for neighboring residents to discuss the potential development with the developer . Bob Mueller, 882 Fox Road , agreed with traffic concerns on Birch Street , adding that t urn lanes are well needed. Mr. Mue ller stated concerns with connecting Fox Road to th e proposed development. He does not consider the connection to be a benefit to most property owners and would prefer keeping the existing cul -de -sac in Foxoborough, unless the connection is for emergency vehicle purposes. He noted that the property owners in the proposed development may prefer a cul -de -sac as well. Mr. Fehn added that development is increasing in Centerville and the traffic will get worse. Marilyn Anderson, 884 Old Birch St, stated that this p roperty used to be her family farm and she had no objections to the plat. S he stated concern that the north -south section of Old Birch Street is decaying. She noted that it is city policy to not spend a lot of money to improve streets. She pointe d out that there is going to be an increase in traffic and the street will further decay. She is concerned that the few residents that live on Old Birch Street are going to have to pay for its reconstruction. Ms. Anderson added that she does not foresee the ch arter being amended . She is concerned with residents paying for improvements to Old Birch Street . Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2013 Page 5 APPROVED MINUTES Sharon G ervais, 890 Old Birch St, stated concerns with speed of traffic and increased traffic. She stated that there needs to be a speed limit sign o n Old Birch Street as drivers go faster than the speed limit. She said that traffic needs to slow down. She is not in favor of the proposed development. Jason Wedel, City Engineer, acknowledge d that there needs to be further analysis of traffic on Old B irch Street. Th e city will continue to work with Anoka County to analyze site distance and traffic safety for accessing Old Birch Street. The issue is not resolved and will be further addressed. The city will continue to review the best options for the n orth/s outh section of Old Birch St. Staff will bring back considerations for the board to review at a future meeting. Chair Tralle addressed the concerns of the residents , including: • T he city posted signs alerting residents of the future connection of Fox Road • I nterconnection o f neighborhoods is necessary for eme rgency vehicle access • This area is able to develop now due to access to utilities that were not available in the past • The board will do their best to address traffic concerns • An installation of a speed limit sign on Old Birch Street should be feasib le • The board is working in favor of the residents and will strive to achieve the best possible outcome for everyone • The engineering report is typical of any development • Staff will make the engineering report accessible to the public via the city website Linda Dawson said that the connection of Fox Road was being proposed sooner than she was expecting. She asked about potential development of neighboring properties. Staff addressed the neighboring p roperties as shown on the public hearing notice and explained areas of wetland s and area s for potential future development. Ms. Dawson was concern ed with the amount of money that goes into developments. She a ppreciates the conservation wetland developmen ts. She stated issues with taxpayers paying for road improvements. M ichael Grochala , Community Development Director, clarified that the d eveloper will be paying for 100% of the costs of the improvements on this project. The developer would pay for all n ew roads and utilities for this development. The developer would pay a park dedication fee per lot, of which the city would credit back for any park improvements such as trails . Any improvements to Old Birch Street necessitated by this development would be the responsibility of the developer , such as disturbances due to utility extension. Mr. Grochala reiterated that no assessments are being proposed to any of the properties abutting th is project. Staff explained how the trunk area fee is collecte d by t he city. Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2013 Page 6 APPROVED MINUTES Mr. Grochala pointed out that neighborhood meetings are optional as part of a proposed d evelopment , but encouraged by staff . Staff agreed to continue to work with the developer to address concerns and bring the item back to the next meeting. Chair Tralle thanked the residents for their participation and invited them back to the next meeting for updates. Mr. Lad en made a MOTION to continue the Public Hearing at 8 :28 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson . Motion carried 6 - 0. Board member s encouraged residents to educate themselves with the city charter to learn about the process to improve roads. Staff invited residents to attend an informational meeting at city hall on Monday, November 18 , 2013 at 5:30 p.m. to learn about the public imp rovement process. C. Final Plat for Alino Addition K atie Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval of the Final Plat for Alino Addition. The developer representative was present for any questions by the board. Mr. Nelso n made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Final Plat for Alino Addition based on the following conditions of approval : 1. Comments from the City Engineer Letter dated October 28, 2013 shall be addressed. 2. A Development Contract shall be drafted by the City and executed by the City and the owner. 3. A Declaration of Access Control for future right in/right out access shall be drafted by t he City and executed by the City and owner. 4. A Reciprocal Access Easement and Maintenance Agreement shall be drafted by the ow ner and approved by the City. 5. Sheet 1 of the Final Plat shall be revised to include “…hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and the drainage and utility easements as shown by this plat”. 6. An up -to -date (within 3 months) title insuranc e commitment for the property being subdivided shall be provided. 7. The legal description on the title commitment does not match the final plat. 8. The legal description on the preliminary plat does not match the final plat. 9. The title commitment only shows Rich ard Schreier as fee simple owner but the final plat has both his name and Alino, LLC signing. 10. Any future easements required for drainage or utilities shall be dedicated by the owner. Planning & Zoning Board November 13, 2013 Page 7 APPROVED MINUTES 11. Site Plan Review for development of Lot 1, Block 1 (Metro Transit Park an d Ride) will require additional agreements and permits such as but not limited to: a. Site Improvements Performance Agreement b. Declaration for Maintenance of Storm Water Facilities c. Grading Permit d. Building Permit e. NPDES Permit f. RCWD Permit Motion was supported b y Mr. Hyden . Motion carried 5 - 0 . (Evenson & Tralle abstained .) 6 . DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Updates Katie Larsen, City Planner , provided an update of current city projects . 7 . ADJOURNMENT M r. Hyden made a MOTION to a djourn the meeting at 8 :40 p .m. Motion was supported by M r. Masonick . Motion carried 6 - 0 . Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Ass istant