Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/23/2000 Council Packet• • AGENDA EXPANDED AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday October 23, 2000 6:30 P.M. - Call to Order and Roll Call: DAHL, CARLSON, O'DONNELL, REINERT - Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Minutes i) August 28, 2000, Council Minutes - REMOVED ii) September 6, 2000, Work Session Minutes - REMOVED iii) September 11, 2000, Council Minutes - REMOVED iv) September 20, 2000, Work Session Minutes - REMOVED v) September 25, 2000, Council Minutes - REMOVED vi) October 4, 2000, Work Session Minutes - REMOVED vii) October 9, 2000, Council Minutes — REMOVED MOTION BY O'DONNELL, SECONDED BY CARLSON TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED B) Consideration of Expenditures: i) October 23, 2000 (Check No. 60170— 60280 in the amount of $681,164.43) ii) CARLSON ADDED CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT C) Youth Services Officer Agreement 2 Open Mike • • AGENDA 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Public Hearing, SECOND READING on Ordinance 14 -00, Adopting a Franchise Agreement with Reliant Energy Minnegasco (3/5 Vote Required) MOTION BY REINERT, SECONDED BY CARLSON TO APPROVE SECOND READING AS STATED. MOTION CARRIED B) Public Hearing, FIRST READING on Ordinance 15 -00, Establishing a Meter Fee for Customers of Reliant Energy Minnegasco (continued from October 9, 2000 , 3/5 Vote Required) MOTION BY O'DONNELL, SECONDED BY CARLSON TO APPROVE FOR SAKE OF DISCUSSION— UPON DISCUSSION MOTION DENIED ALL VOTING NO 4. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution No. 00 -104 Authorizing City Clerk to Certify Delinquent Water & Sewer Utility Bills MOTION BY CARLSON, SECONDED BY O'DONNELL TO APPROVE AUTHORIZING CITY CLERK TO CERTIFY DELINQUENT WATER & SEWER UTILITY BILLS. MOTION CARRIED 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) Resolution No. 00 -101, Accept Donations for Family Turkey Shoot (3/5 Vote Required) MOTION BY O'DONNELL, SECONDED BY CARLSON TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 00-101. MOTION CARRIED B) Resolution No. 00 -102, Accept Donation from Forest Lake Area Athletic Association (FLAAA) (3/5 Vote Required) MOTION BY REINERT, SECONDED BY CARLSON TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 00 -102. MOTION CARRIED 7. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel A) Nancy Anderson, 3522 Carl Street, Variance, Mary Kay Wyland MOTION BY REINERT, SECONDED BY O'DONNELL TO APPROVE VARIANCE, 3522 CARL STREET. MOTION CARRIED 8. Unfinished Business 9. New Business • AGENDA 10. Community Calendar, October 24 through November 13, 2000: A) Wednesday, October 24, 2000. 6:30 p.m., Environmental Board Meeting B) Thursday, November 2, 2000, 7:00 a.m., EDAC C) Monday, November 6, 2000, 6:00 p.m., Clearwater Creek Park Master Planning Meeting followed by Park Board Meeting D) Tuesday, November 7, 2000, Election Day E) Wednesday, November 8, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session F) Friday, November 10, 2000, City Hall Closed in Observance of Veteran's Day G) Saturday, November 11, 2000, 10:00 to 11:30 a.m., Family Turkey Shoot, Centennial Middle School H) Monday, November 13, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 11. Adjourn • Revised 10 /18 /00 /jmv • • EXPENDITURES OCTOBER 23, 2000 • • Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 10:49:36 Journal #: 1264 CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL FM Entry - Invoice - A/P Auto Posting Journal Trans # Tr Type Post Type Tran Date Vendor # Name � Amount her# Invoice# PO# Invoice Date Project Description Page: 1 * *Add ** 1 MAN 09/30/2000 000507 REILING, GEORGE 284,430.99 59876 09/14/2000 0 -00 EMINENT DOMAIN Check Date: 09/14/2000 Check Number: 59876 Line: 1 * * * * ** Acct #: 454- 499 -5140 -001 Desc: EMINENT DOMAIN Gross: 284,430.99 Bank #: 1 Title: 1994 CONST LAND ACQUISION HIWAY49 Disc: .00 Cash #: 454 Asset: N Project: N - 00 1099: .00 Fiscal: 09/2000 Inv: N Net: 284,430.99 Updated Totals: • • * * * * ** Gross: 284,430.99* Discount: Totals * * * * ** .00* 1099: .00* Net: 284,430.99* Date: 10/13/2000 Time: 10:32:33 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) . Entry Journal #: (R) 1257 1257 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) /d- Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000069 KUNDE COMPANY, INC. 1 1,248.00 1,248.00 .00 .00 000493 ASSET RECOVERY CORPORATION 1 236.25 236.25 .00 .00 000498 MONARCH HOMES, INC. 1 415.00 415.00 .00 .00 001116 CHARLIE'S TREE SERVICE 1 692.25 692.25 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 3,187.25 3,187.25 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 2,475.10 2,475.10 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 5,303.88 5,303.88 .00 .00 001506 FIRSTAR BANK USA, N.A. 1 940.74 940.74 .00 .00 001780 HAMMES, WILLIAM 1 536.80 536.80 .00 .00 001840 HILLESHEIM, TIM 1 122.94 122.94 .00 .00 001932 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1 3,795.79 3,795.79 .00 . .00 011111) KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. 1 134.79 134.79 .00 .00 002467 MAC MAY HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002540 MEDICA 1 20,548.93 20,548.93 .00 .00 002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 48,217.00 48,217.00 .00 .00 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 2 93.58 93.58 .00 .00 002760 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 3,419.00 3,419.00 .00 .00 002836 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 1 7,066.28 7,066.28 .00 .00 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 13,678.30 13,678.30 .00 .00 003452 PERA /COUNCIL 1 217.28 217.28 .00 .00 003815 ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF 1 297.00 297.00 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 109.00 109.00 .00 .00 • Date: 10/13/2000 Time: 10:32:41 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 443.28 443.28 .00 .00 004059 SMYSER, JEFF 1 172.00 172.00 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 9,102.59 9,102.59 .00 .00 004603 UNITED WISCONSIN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 717.42 717.42 .00 .00 004671 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 402.09 402.09 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 29 124,072.54 124,072.54 .00 .00* • Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 13:46:48 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) S Entry Journal #: (R) 1259 - 1264 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) 7 U -' d� - (/ Due Date: (A) / Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 1 227.48 227.48 .00 .00 000052 A T & T 1 43.83 43.83 .00 .00 000095 ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. 1 131.98 131.98 .00 .00 000106 US WEST 2 2,363.01 2,363.01 .00 .00 000157 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, INC. 1 31.95 31.95 .00 .00 000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 9.75 9.75 .00 .00 000174 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 708.70 708.70 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 2 71.02 71.02 .00 .00 000260 AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC. 1 480.90 480.90 .00 .00 000264 MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. 1 25.15 25.15 .00 .00 000320 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY, INC. 1 665.09 665.09 .00 .00 411114 TAYLOR APPRAISAL COMPANY, INC. 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 000369 BLAINE BROTHERS, INC. 1 13.60 13.60 .00 .00 000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 130.55 130.55 .00 .00 000430 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 936.31 936.31 .00 .00 000470 TOTAL CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. 1 588.85 588.85 .00 .00 000499 ASSOCIATED PLUS TITLE 1 12,524.36 12,524.36 .00 .00 000501 CENTURY FARM DEVELOPMENT 1 4,511.47 4,511.47 .00 .00 000502 D. THOMAS JEWELRY 1 2,163.02 2,163.02 .00 .00 000503 JOYER, JOE 1 120.00 120.00 .00 .00 000504 LAND TITLE 1 60,904.97 60,904.97 .00 .00 • Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 13 :46:52 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost ID 000506 SAVE A LIFE 1 276.00 276.00 .00 .00 000507 REILING, GEORGE 1 284,430.99 284,430.99 .00 .00 000780 BRAD RAGAN, INC. 1 1,192.29 1,192.29 .00 .00 000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 1 181.32 181.32 .00 .00 000880 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. 1 1,577.10 1,577.10 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 794.24 794.24 .00 .00 000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 65.87 65.87 .00 .00 000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 12,023.50 12,023.50 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 59.10 59.10 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 90,026.22 90,026.22 .00 .00 001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 1 2,200.00 2,200.00 .00 .00 001053 CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL ALIGN, INC. 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 001117 CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE 1 1,080.00 1,080.00 .00 .00 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 237.90 237.90 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 2 3,684.75 3,684.75 .00 .00 001309 DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC. 1 678.86 678.86 .00 .00 011111° HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 5.00 5.00 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 275.27 275.27 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 140.53 140.53 .00 .00 001584 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 1 2,317.58 2,317.58 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 1 88.19 88.19 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 86.88 86.88 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 1 75.48 75.48 .00 .00 001680 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 1 267.20 267.20 .00 .00 001720 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. 2 270.63 270.63 .00 .00 001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 40.19 40.19 .00 .00 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 76.09 76.09 .00 .00 • Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 13:46:56 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002280 LAND TITLE 1 11,278.66 11,278.66 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 9.62 9.62 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS 2 599.59 599.59 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 1 12.07 12.07 .00 .00 002581 METROPOLITAN EMERG MANGERS ASSOC 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 002691 MIKE TORKELSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 1 475.00 475.00 .00 .00 002700 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 1 261.30 261.30 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 392.85 392.85 .00 .00 003250 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 1 8,280.61 8,280.61 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY WORKS 1 176.00 176.00 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 505.40 505.40 .00 .00 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 1 178.18 178.18 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 109.00 109.00 .00 .00 003990 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF 1 11,094.45 11,094.45 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 32.64 32.64 .00 .00 004060 SNAP -ON TOOL,INC. 1 106.45 106.45 .00 .00 IlkCONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE 1 80.60 80.60 .00 .00 004172 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 390.00 390.00 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,124.00 1,124.00 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 1,696.23 1,696.23 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 197.68 197.68 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 566.51 566.51 .00 .00 004512 TRUGREEN- MAPLEWOOD #4635 1 178.92 178.92 .00 .00 004530 TURF SUPPLIES, INC. 1 3,995.81 3,995.81 .00 .00 004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC. 1 277.00 277.00 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 3 18,761.98 18,761.98 .00 .00 004611 UNITED SUPPLY CORPORATION 1 170.42 170.42 .00 .00 Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 13:47:00 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name # of items Operator: JAL Page: 4 Net Gross Discount Discount Lost 004800 WESSEL, BRIAN 1 757.00 757.00 .00 .00 004803 WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 89.00 89.00 .00 .00 005029 NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA 1 2,200.00 2,200.00 .00 .00 005031 GOPHER SPORT, INC. 1 120.63 120.63 .00 .00 006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 251.63 251.63 .00 .00 900066 AVALON HOMES 4 1,975.00 1,975.00 .00 .00 900523 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 5 79.49 79.49 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 100 557,091.89 557,091.89 .00 .00* • • Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 11:15:04 410 Ranges: Options: Operator: JAL Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 0 0 60173 60174 60175 60178 0 60181 60182 60183 0 60185 7 8 60189 0 0 0 0 0 • 1258 - 1266 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. ASSOCIATED PLUS TITLE AVALON HOMES CENTURY FARM DEVELOPME DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FIRSTAR BANK USA, N.A. HAMMES, WILLIAM ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCI LAND TITLE MAC MAY HOMES MEDICA METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT MIKE TORKELSON DEVELOP MINNESOTA STATE TREASU MN. DEPT OF HEALTH MONARCH HOMES, INC. PERA /COUNCIL PERA /REGULAR PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SHOREVIEW, CITY OF TAYLOR APPRAISAL COMPA WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A DOOR STRIPES REFUND ASSESSMENTS REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6432 C REFUND ASSESSMENTS MONTHLY SERVICE LODGING /ZIPCD MILEAGE /MEALS /LODGING /HE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REFUND ASSESSMENTS REIMB BLDG ESCROW /706 79 HEALTH INSURANCE NOV SEWER /SEPT SAC REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6557 L QUARTERLY SURCHARGE QUARTERLY STATE WATER FE REIMBURSE WATER METER SA PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN EMINENT DOMAIN APPRAISAL MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY Total for Dept ** * * * * * * ** 131.98 * * * * * * ** 12,524.36 * * * * * * ** 1,975.00 * * * * * * ** 4,511.47 * * * * * * ** 1,460.88 * * * * * * ** 802.34 * * * * * * ** 536.80 * * * * * * ** 3,795.79 * * * * * * ** 72,183.63 * * * * * * ** 500.00 * * * * * * ** 6,091.79 * * * * * * ** 18,513.00 * * * * * * ** 475.00 * * * * * * ** 7,066.28 * * * * * * ** 3,419.00 * * * * * * ** 415.00 * * * * * * ** 217.28 * * * * * * ** 13,678.30 * * * * * * ** 45.60 * * * * * * ** 676.31 * * * * * * ** 11,094.45 * * * * * * ** 1,500.00 * * * * * * ** 202.00 161,816.26* 0 CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE GOLF LESSONS ADULT IN 380.00 O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING ADULT IN 95.00 Total for Dept 201 475.00* 0 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. TROPHIES /NAME PLATE Total for Dept 202 O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES Total for Dept 205 O CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS OPTIONS PROGRAM ADULT SP SPECIAL YOUTH IN 181.32 181.32* 35.62 35.62* 2,200.00 Date: 10/17/2000 Time 11:15:05 Operator: JAL Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE GOLF LESSONS 0 GOPHER SPORT, INC. SOCCER BALLS /VESTS 0 NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA OPTIONS PROGRAM O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING Total for Dept 207 O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN 700.00 120.63 2,200.00 190.00 5,410.63* YOUTH SP 95.00 Total for Dept 208 95.00* O D. THOMAS JEWELRY PINS /TAGS /CHARMS MAYOR /CO 2,163.02 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC OCTOBER 3 MAYOR /CO 394.88 Total for Dept 401 2,557.90* O ANOKA COUNTY FILING FEE ADMINIST 130.55 O BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, MILEAGE ADMINIST 9.75 O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINIST 45.09 0 D.C.A. INC. FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI ADMINIST 237.90 60173 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MONTHLY SERVICE ADMINIST 88.40 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING ADMINIST 44.45 60182 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE ADMINIST 1,007.53 O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST 20.00 60190 ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF MUNICI -PALS ADMINIST 66.00 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ADMINIST 69.05 Total for Dept 402 1,718.72* 0 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES ELECTION 14.01 O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES ELECTION 5.29 Total for Dept 403 19.30* III 3 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MONTHLY SERVICE SENIORS 13.82 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SENIORS 4.00 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SENIORS 4.44 Total for Dept 406 22.26* 60173 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MONTHLY SERVICE FINANCE 44.21 60182 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE FINANCE 400.00 O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FINANCE 12.00 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FINANCE 37.33 Total for Dept 407 493.54* O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY LEGAL CO 11,498.30 Total for Dept 414 11,498.30* 60174 FIRSTAR BANK USA, N.A. LODGING /ZIPCD ECONOMIC 138.40 O IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING ECONOMIC 266.78 60182 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE ECONOMIC 607.53 O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ECONOMIC 12.00 60190 ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF MUNICI -PALS ECONOMIC 33.00 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ECONOMIC 40.03 O WESSEL, BRIAN PARKING /MEALS /REGISTRATI ECONOMIC 757.00 Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 11:15:06 Operator: JAL Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description 0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY Total for Dept 415 60173 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MONTHLY SERVICE 60182 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60193 SMYSER, JEFF MILEAGE /MEALS /SEMINAR 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Dept 416 60172 60173 0 0 0 0 0 60182 0 60184 0 0 60190 60192 0 0 60195 60196 III0 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI QUARTERLY BUDGET 60173 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MONTHLY SERVICE 60182 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 421 CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GALL'S INC. GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH JOYER, JOE MEDICA METROPOLITAN EMERG MAN MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. NORTHERN STATES POWER, RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF SAM'S CLUB, INC. SAVE A LIFE STATE OF MINNESOTA MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE PARTS /SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE PRINTING GOPHER BOUNTY /160 HEALTH INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE MUNICI -PALS SUPPLIES CERTIFICATES CONNECT CHARGES Dept ECONOMIC PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE PAIR POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE INS POLICE POLICE UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY VERIZON WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 60173 0 60182 0 60190 0 0 60195 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH MEDICA RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE INS FIRE MONTHLY SERVICE PRINTING HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE MUNICI -PALS POWER SUPPLY ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Dept 422 60172 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE 0 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN ADVERTISING 60173 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MONTHLY SERVICE • BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING STREETS STREETS STREETS Amount 101.00 1,955.74* 110.51 207.53 8.00 172.00 26.10 524.14* 10.65 350.03 2.76 88.19 39.53 118.00 120.00 6,946.90 60.00 53.80 3.14 100.00 99.00 376.31 276.00 390.00 290.22 402.09 9,726.62* 90,026.22 35.91 650.00 8.00 19.68 90,739.81* 44.20 88.90 607.53 12.00 33.00 32.64 1,124.00 36.05 1,978.32* 470.19 80.60 88.41 Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 11:15:06 Operator: JAL • Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 60182 60184 0 0 0 0 0 60195 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60173 0 0 0 60179 0 60182 0 0 11110 5 0 0 0 60172 0 0 0 60182 0 0 0 0 0 60192 0 60195 0 • Description Dept Amount FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. NORTHERN STATES POWER, PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SNAP -ON TOOL, INC. T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS PARTS /SUPPLIES HEALTH INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE PULLER SET ASPHALT STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS STREETS WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION R STREETS Total for Dept 430 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC BLAINE BROTHERS, INC. BRAD RAGAN, INC. BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. LEEF BROTHER, INC. MEDICA RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH UNITED SUPPLY CORPORAT GREASE FITTING /PLUG REPAIR /PRESSURE WASHER SCREW TIRES PARTS /SUPPLIES ALIGN FRONT WHEELS DIESEL MONTHLY SERVICE PARTS /SUPPLIES CLEANER FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET POINTS /CONDENSOR /SPRING/ FLEET BATTERY /BELT FLEET SHOP TOWELS FLEET HEALTH INSURANCE FLEET LIFE INSURANCE FLEET PARTS /SUPPLIES FLEET SUPPLIES FLEET UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FLEET W. W. GRAINGER, INC. HAND CRANK REEL FLEET Total for Dept 431 A T & T ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY, CONNEXUS ENERGY DIAMOND CLEANING SERVI FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN MEDICA MENARDS, INC. MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA NORTHERN STATES POWER, PITNEY WORKS RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SAM'S CLUB, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE PAPER MONTHLY SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICE PARTS /SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE HEALTH INSURANCE ELBOW /COLLAR /CLAMPS MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE PROTECTION PLAN LIFE INSURANCE SUPPLIES TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 432 GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 15.09 415.06 8.84 2,899.41 39.90 22.00 106.45 1,696.23 50.74 89.00 5,981.92* 44.39 480.90 13.60 1,192.29 794.24 55.00 3,684.75 44.20 275.27 86.88 40.19 134.79 9.62 800.00 4.00 197.68 170.42 -20.94 226.32 8,233.60* 43.83 665.09 1,319.04 678.86 36.44 35.95 400.00 12.07 129.94 3,212.40 176.00 4.00 66.97 277.00 8.28 2,062.53 9,128.40* Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 11:15:07 Operator: JAL Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, O ALL SEASONS RENTAL, IN 0 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU 0 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI O BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, I 60173 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH 60182 MEDICA 60184 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 0 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA 0 NATURE CALLS, INC. 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN 60190 ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF 0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK O TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS 0 TRUGREEN - MAPLEWOOD #46 0 TURF SUPPLIES, INC. SOD POWER SOD CUTTER NYLON TIES PARCEL SEARCH RED BALL DIAMOND MONTHLY SERVICE PARTS /SUPPLIES PRINTING HEALTH INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE RENTAL OF PORTABLE MONTHLY SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE MUNICI -PALS PARKS DATA SERVICE AGREEMENT BEHM'S PARK SUPPLIES PARKS RENTAL PARKS PARKS PARKS AGG PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS RESTR PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARKS 0 US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS Total for Dept 450 O BURSACK, ELIZABETH O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC 60173 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH 60182 MEDICA III84 PAGING, INC. O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN O ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF O TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS MILEAGE /MEALS OFFICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE PRINTING HEALTH INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE MUNICI -PALS SERVICE AGREEMENT RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RECREATI Total for Dept 451 O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES Total for Dept 452 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING 60182 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE O MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVI DELIVERY SERVICE 60184 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC SEPTEMBER 27 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 461 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE O SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL 60191 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL • PARK BOA ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM INS ENVIRONM SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA 227.48 31.95 26.63 25.00 1,577.10 132.65 13.12 18.51 1,600.00 8.84 46.25 392.85 87.85 22.00 33.00 178.18 88.08 178.92 3,995.81 69.98 239.11 8,993.31* 65.87 43.87 22.10 18.50 207.53 8.84 12.80 33.00 163.55 30.77 606.83* 76.09 76.09* 44.45 200.00 25.15 4.42 1.80 171.63 6.82 454.27* .40 109.00 109.00 Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 11:15:07 Operator: JAL Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SOLID WA 1.52 Total for Dept 462 219.92* 60170 ASSET RECOVERY CORPORA PROCESS CHARGE FORESTRY 236.25 60171 CHARLIE'S TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL & GRINDING FORESTRY 692.25 60180 KUNDE COMPANY, INC. OAK WILT INSPECTION FORESTRY 1,248.00 60182 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE FORESTRY 200.00 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FORESTRY 1.80 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FORESTRY 6.84 Total for Dept 463 2,385.14* 60172 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 1,009.46 60173 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 19.89 O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES WATER 67.83 O GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 133.60 O HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN CONTAINER DEMURRAGE WATER 5.00 60176 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN CHEMICALS WATER 5,303.88 60177 HILLESHEIM, TIM REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW WATER 61.47 60182 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE WATER 103.77 60184 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 4.42 O MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 85.11 O NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 1,405.91 O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING WATER 19.95 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE WATER 7.60 O U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, COPPERHORN WATER 18,761.98 60194 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, REGISTER WATER 9,102.59 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS WATER 21.53 O US WEST MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 61.37 O W. W. GRAINGER, INC. VENTILATION CONTROL WATER 44.31 Total for Dept 494 36,219.67* 60172 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 377.91 60173 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 19.89 O GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 133.60 60177 HILLESHEIM, TIM REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW SEWER 61.47 60182 MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE SEWER 103.76 60183 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT NOV SEWER /SEPT SAC SEWER 29,704.00 60184 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 4.42 0 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 671.90 O OLSON SEWER SERVICE, I ROTOR THREE DRAINS SEWER 225.00 O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING SEWER 19.95 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SEWER 7.60 O TOTAL CONTROL SYSTEMS, CHANGE /DOWNLOAD /TEST SLS SEWER 588.85 60195 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SEWER 18.98 O W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIAT REPAIRS /LIFT STATION #6 SEWER 708.70 Total for Dept 495 32,646.03* 0 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JU LAND PURCHASE OTHER 2,317.58 59876 M REILING, GEORGE EMINENT DOMAIN OTHER 284,430.99 O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY OTHER 222.20 • Date: 10/17/2000 Time: 11:15:08 Operator: JAL Page: 7 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Chek # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 499 286,970.77* Grand Total 681,164.43* • • • MEMORANDUM • • Centennial School District No. 12 Dr. John M. Christiansen 4707 North Road Superintendent Circle Pines MN 55014 (763) 792 -6010 To: From: Date: Subj: Dave Pecchia, Chief of Police Dr. John M. Christiansen, Superintendent October 17, 2000 Youth Services Officer Agreement Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the Youth Resource Officer Service Agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and Independent School District No. 12 (Centennial) for the 2000 -2001 school year with the updated salary schedule. The Board appreciates the excellent working relationship we have with the City of Lino Lakes and your department and has approved this agreement at their regular meeting of October 16, 2000. Please have the appropriate people sign this agreement, keep one for your records, and return two (2) to me. I will make a copy to give to Officer Brown. Again, thanks for all your support of the Centennial School District. • • • YOUTH RESOURCE OFFICER CITY OF LINO LAKES /CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SERVICE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this 16th day of October , 2000, pursuant to M.S. 471.59 by and between the City of Lino Lakes (City) and Independent School District #12 (School District). 1. PI TRPOSF4 The City of Lino Lakes and the Centennial School District wish to participate in a Youth Resource Officer Program. Both the City and the School District agree that a more formalized approach to the Youth Resource Officer Program is needed to improve understanding and promote mutual respect between police, school, staff, counselors, parents and students. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth in writing the terms and conditions of the mutual duties and obligations and to create, fund and implement the position of Youth Resource Officer. 2. FIINT)ING The School District will fund the following expenses in connection with the Youth Resource Officer: Officer's salary and related benefits are estimated at $43,062.22 for the 2000 -01 school year (see attached detail sheet for the cost breakdown). This expenditure shall be determined by the number of hours assigned to the school district. The hourly rate for 2000 -2001 shall be $31.66. The School District officials and Lino Lakes Police Chief shall determine the specific days/hours of work. 3. ,SERVICES The City shall provide the services of one licensed police officer and related support services and supplies to assist the School District in establishing a Youth Resource Officer Program. The Officer will have primary responsibility in serving as a resource person to faculty, classroom members and school administrators in the promoting of positive juvenile behavior. The School District agrees to provide adequate office space, telephone and other reasonable clerical support services. 4. PAYMENT The City shall provide billing to the School District for services provided in this Agreement on a quarterly basis. 5. TERM This Agreement shall commence on the 5Lh day of September, 2000, and shall end on/or about June 7, 2001 Thereafter, it shall be renewed on a yearly basis by mutual agreement. This Agreement may be canceled by either party by a 30 day written notice. • Police Liaison Agreement Page 2 • • 6. GENERAL PROVISIONS It is expressly agreed that the Youth Resource Officer is a City employee and shall not be considered an employee of the School District for any purpose including but not limited to salaries, wages, other compensations or fringe benefits, Workers Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, P.E.R.A., Social Security, Liability Insurance, keeping of personnel records, termination of employment, individual contracts or other contractual rights. The City shall assume all liability for the actions taken by the Officer in the performance of his/her duty as a Peace Officer. The Officer will report to and be directed by the Chief of Police, but will consult regularly with School District Officials. Resolution of unforeseen problems arising in this program shall be negotiated by representatives of the School District and the Chief of Police. 7. ,SCHEDITI,ING The duty hours of the Youth Resource Officer are flexible and will be primarily coordinated with the school day and activities. The Officer will make daily contact with the Police Department for the purpose of keeping abreast of incident reports and other City activity. During non - school periods, the Officer duties and schedule will be determined by the City. 8. DISCRIMINATION The City and School District agree not to discriminate in providing services under this Agreement on the basis of race, sex, creed, national origin, age or religion. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST WRITTEN ABOVE. City of Lino Lakes Centennial School District #12 John J. Bergeson, Mayor r. John M. Christiansen, Superintendent Ry -Chel Gaustad Charles Cheesebrough City Clerk/Treasurer School Board Chairperson Dave Peechia Chief of Police Rick Olson School Board Clerk • • City of Lino Lakes School Liaison September 5, 2000 through June 7, 2001 2000 -2001 Wages Annually Third Year Salary $49,436.00 2000 -2001 Benefits Holiday Pay 3,422.49 PERA 9.30% 4,915.84 Medicare 1.45% 766.45 Health Insurance 390 4,680.00 Dental 10.00 120.00 Life Insurance 16.92 203.04 Worker's Comp 3.36/$100 1,776.05 Uniform 540.00 Total Benefits $16,423.87 Total City Cost $65,859.87 Hours Per Year 2080 Less: 12 Sick Days (96) Less: 2 Weeks Vacation (80) Total Hours worked per year 1,904 Hourly Rate: $31.66 Avg. School Term is 170 days (1,360 hours) Cost to School: (1360 x $31.66) $43,062.22 • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM -3 h Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator October 23, 2000 Public Hearing and Second Reading on Proposed Ordinance 14 -00 Adopting a Franchise Agreement with Reliant Energy Minnegasco 3/5 Vote The City's franchise agreement with Minnegasco, now known as Reliant Energy Minnegasco, expired several years ago. In 1999 the City Council directed staff to work towards making all the City's franchise agreements more consistent in terms and effective dates. Staff negotiated a new agreement which was reviewed by franchise attorney James Strommen. The agreement is based largely on a model ordinance currently being updated for the League of Minnesota Cities by Mr. Strommen and others. It expires on March 31, 2012, the same date the Circle Pines Utilities franchise agreement ends. The agreement is contained in Ordinance 14 -00, which requires a public hearing and two readings. The public hearing was held on September 25 and continued to October 9. The first reading of the ordinance also occurred on October 9. The public hearing was continued to October 23 when the second reading of the ordinance is scheduled. ACTIONS: 1. Continue the public hearing on Ordinance 14 -00 at 7:00 p.m. Close the public hearing. 2. Approve the second reading of the ordinance. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance 14 -00. 2. Postpone approval of the second reading of Ordinance 14 -00 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Option 1 Lws /franchise /g rn a g re e Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE 14 -00 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASCO, A NATURAL GAS UTILITY, A DIVISION OF RELIANT RESOURCES CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF GAS ENERGY FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USE AND TO USE PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES; AND PRESCRIBING CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes ordains: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Ordinance, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings: 1.1 City. The City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. 1.2 City Utility System. Facilities used for providing non - energy related public utility service owned or operated by the City or agency thereof, including sewer and water service, street lighting and traffic signals, but excluding facilities for providing heating, lighting, or other forms of energy. 1.3 Commission. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, or any successor agency or agencies, including an agency of the federal government that preempts all or part of the authority to regulate gas retail rates now vested in the Commission. 1.4 Company. Reliant Energy Minnegasco, a Division of Reliant Energy Resources Corporation, a Delaware corporation, its successors and assigns, including successors to assignees of those portions of the Company that constitute any part or parts of the Gas Facilities subject to this franchise. 1.5 Effective Date. The date on which the ordinance becomes effective under Section 22. 1.6 Gas. Natural gas, manufactured gas, mixture of natural gas and manufactured gas or other forms of gas energy. 1.7 Gas Facilities. Gas transmission and distribution pipes, mains, lines, ducts, fixtures, and all necessary facilities, equipment and appurtenances owned, operated or otherwise used by the Company for the purpose of providing gas energy for public or private use. 1.8 Non - Betterment Costs. Costs incurred by the Company from relocation, removal or rearrangement of Gas Facilities that do not result in an improvement to the Facilities. • 1.9 Notice. A writing served by a party or parties on another party or parties. Notice to Company must be mailed to: Reliant Energy Minnegasco Government & Public Relations 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 Notice to City must be mailed to: City Clerk City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 1.10 Public Way. Any street, alley or other public right -of -way within the City. 1.11 Public Ground. Land owned or otherwise controlled by the City for parks, open space or similar public purpose. SECTION 2. FRANCHISE. 2.1 Grant of Franchise. The City grants the Company, for a period of until March 31, 2012 from the Effective Date, the right to import, manufacture, transport, distribute and sell Gas for public and private use within and through the limits of the City. This right includes the provision of Gas that is (i) manufactured by the Company or its affiliates and delivered by the Company, (ii) purchased and delivered by the Company or (iii) purchased from another source by the retail customer and delivered by the Company. For these purposes, the Company may construct, operate, repair and maintain Gas Facilities in, on, over, under and across the public Way and Public Ground subject to the provisions of this ordinance. The Company may do all things reasonably necessary or customary to accomplish these purposes, subject to other applicable ordinances, permit requirements and to further provisions of this ordinance. 2.2 Effective Date. This franchise shall be in force and effect from and after its passage of this ordinance and publication as required by law and its acceptance by Company. If Company does not file a written acceptance with the City within 60 days after the date the City Council adopts this ordinance, or otherwise informs the City, at any time, that the Company does not accept this franchise, the City Council by resolution may revoke this franchise or seek its enforcement in a court of competent jurisdiction. 2.3 Non Exclusive Franchise. This ordinance does not grant an exclusive franchise. 2.4 Publication Expense. The expense of publication of this ordinance must be paid by the Company. 2.5 Default: Dispute Resolution. If the City or Company asserts that the other party is in default in the performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party must notify the other party in writing of the default and the desired remedy. • Representatives of the parties must promptly meet and attempt in good faith to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved within thirty (30) days after service of the notice, the parties may jointly select a mediator to facilitate further discussion. The parties will equally share the fees and expenses of the mediator. If a mediator is not used or if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days after first meeting with the mediator, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity. SECTION 3. CONDITIONS OF USE. 3.1 Location of Facilities. Gas facilities shall be located, constructed, and maintained so as not to interfere with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel along and over Public Ways and so as not to disrupt normal operation of any City Utility System. Gas Facilities shall be located on Public Grounds as determined by the City. Company's construction, reconstruction, operation, repair, maintenance, location and relocation of Gas Facilities shall be subject to other reasonable regulations of the City consistent with authority granted the City to manage its Public Ways and Public Grounds under state law, to the extent not inconsistent with a specific term of this franchise. 3.2 Mapping Information. The Company must promptly provide complete and accurate mapping information for any of its Gas Facilities in accordance with Minnesota Rules Parts 7819.4000 and 7819.4100. 3.3 Permit Required. The Company may not open or disturb the surface of any Public Way or Public Ground without first having obtained a permit from the City, for which the City may impose a reasonable fee. The permit conditions imposed on the Company may not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. The Company may, however, open and disturb the surface of any Public Way or Public Ground without a permit if (i) where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of Gas Facilities and (ii) the Company gives notice of the city before, if possible, commencement of the emergency repair. On the next business days after commencing the repair, the Company must apply for any required permits and pay the required fees. 3.4 Restoration. After undertaking any work requiring the opening of any Public Way, the Company shall restore the Public Way in Accordance with Minnesota Rules part 7819.1100 and applicable City ordinances consistent with law. Company shall restore the Public Ground to as good a condition as formerly existed, and shall maintain the surface in good condition for six months thereafter. All work shall be completed as promptly as weather permits, and if Company shall not promptly perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, rubbish, equipment and material, and put the Public Ground in the said condition, the City shall have, after demand to Company to cure and the passage of a reasonable period of time following the demand, but not to exceed five days, the right to make the restoration of Public Ground at the expense of Company. Company shall pay to the City the cost of such work done for or performed by the City. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedy available to the City for noncompliance with this section 3.4. • 3.5 Company Protection of Gas Facilities in Public Ways. The Company must take reasonable measures to prevent the Gas Facilities from causing damage to persons or property. The Company must take reasonable measures to protect the Gas Facilities from damage that could be inflicted on the Facilitates by persons, property or the elements. The Company must take protective measures when the City performs work near the Gas Facilities, if given reasonable notice by the City of such work prior to its commencement. 3.6 Notice of Improvements. The City must give the Company reasonable notice of plans for improvements to Public Ways or Public Ground where the City has reason to believe that Gas Facilities may affect or be affected by the improvement. The notice must contain; (i) the nature and character of the improvement, (ii) the Public Ways or Public Grounds upon which the improvements are to be made, (iii) the extent of the improvements, (iv) the time when the City will start the work, and, (v) if more than one Public Way or Public Ground is involved, the order in which the work is to proceed. The notice must be given to the Company a sufficient length of time in advance of the actual commencement of the work to permit the Company to make any necessary additions, alterations, or repairs to its Gas Facilities. If streets are at final width and grade and the City has installed underground sewer and water mains and service connections to the property line abutting the streets prior to a permanent paving or resurfacing of such streets, and the Company' s main is located under such street, the City .may require the Company to install gas service connections prior to such paving or resurfacing, if it is apparent that gas service will be required during the five years following the paving or resurfacing. SECTION 4. RELOCATIONS. 4.1 Relocation of Gas Facilities in Public Ways. The Company shall comply with Minnesota Rules, part 7819.3100 and applicable City relocation ordinances consistent with law. 4.2 Relocation of Gas Facilities in Public Ground. The City may require the Company to relocate the Gas Facilities within or remove the Gas Facilities from Public Ground, upon a finding by City that the Gas Facilities have become or will become a substantial impairment of the public use or enjoyment to which the Public Ground is or will be put. The relocation or removal will be at the Company's expense. The provisions of this Section 4.2 apply only to Gas Facilities constructed in reliance on this franchise and the Company does not waive its rights under an easement or prescriptive right in the Public Ground. 4.3 Vacation of Public Ways. The City shall give Company at least two weeks prior written notice of a proposed vacation of a Public Way. The City and the Company shall comply with Minnesota Rules, 7819.3200 and applicable ordinances consistent with law. 4.4 Projects with Federal Funding. Relocation, removal or rearrangement of any Gas Facilities made necessary because of the extension into or through the City of a federally -aided highway project shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.46. • SECTION 5. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION. 5.1 Indemnity of City. Company shall defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all liability, on account of injury to persons or damage to property occasioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Gas Facilities located in the Public Ways and Public Grounds. The City shall not be indemnified for losses or claims occasioned through its own negligence except for losses or claims arising out of or alleging the City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or inspection of, Company's plans or work. 5.2 Defense of City. In the event a suit is brought against the City under circumstances where this agreement to indemnify applies, Company at its sole cost and expense shall defend the City in such suit if written notice thereof is promptly given to Company within a period wherein Company is not prejudiced by lack of such notice. If Company is required to indemnify and defend, it will thereafter have control of such litigation, but Company may not settle such litigation without the consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to the city. The Company, in defending any action on behalf of the City, shall be entitled to assert in any action ever or immunity that the City could assert in its own behalf. This franchise agreement shall not be interpreted to constitute a waiver by the City of any of its defenses of immunity or limitations on liability under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. SECTION 6. SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. This ordinance and the rights and obligations conferred hereby, is binding on and inures to the benefit of the City and its successors and on the Company and its successors and permitted assigns. This ordinance and the franchise it confers may not be assigned by the Company without the written consent of the City. SECTION 7. FRANCHISE FEE. 7.1 Form. During the term of franchise hereby granted, and in addition to permit fees being imposed or that the City has a right to impose, the City may charge the Company a franchise fee. The fee may be (i) a percentage of gross revenues received by the company for its operations with the City, or (ii) a flat fee per customer based on metered service to retail customers within the City or on some other similar basis, or (iii) a fee based on units of energy delivered to any class of retail customers within the corporate limits of the City. The method of imposing the franchise fee, the percentage of revenue rate, or the flat rate based on metered service may differ for each customer class or combine the methods described in (i) — (iii) above in assessing the fee. The City shall seek to use a formula that provides a stable and predictable amount of fees, without placing the Company at a competitive disadvantage. If the company claims that the. City required fee formula is discriminatory or otherwise places the Company at a competitive disadvantage, the Company shall provide a formula that will produce a substantially similar fee amount to the City and reimburse the City's reasonable fees and costs in reviewing the implementing the formula. The City will attempt to accommodate the Company but is under no franchise obligation to adopt the Company - proposed franchise fee formula and such review will not delay the implementation of the City- imposed fee. • r 7.2 Separate Ordinance. The franchise fee shall be imposed by separate ordinance duly adopted by the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted until at least sixty days after written notice enclosing such proposed ordinance has been served upon the Company. The fee shall become effective sixty days after such adopted ordinance is published. 7.3 Condition of Fee. The separate ordinance imposing the fee shall not be effective against the Company unless it lawfully imposes a fee of the same or substantially similar amount on the sale of energy within the City by any other energy supplier, provided that, as to such supplier the City has the authority or contractual right to require a franchise fee or similar fee through a previously agreed upon franchise. 7.4 Collection of Fee. The franchise fee shall be payable not less than quarterly during complete billing months of the period for which payment is to be made. The franchise fee formula may be changed from time to time, however, the change shall meet the same notice requirements and the fee may not be changed more often than annually. Such fee shall not exceed any amount which the Company may legally charge to its customers prior to payment to the City. Such fee is subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectibles and customer refunds incurred by the Company. The Company agrees to make available for inspection by the City at reasonable times all records necessary to audit the Company's determination of the franchise fee payments. 7.5 Continuation of Franchise Fee. If this franchise expires and City and the Company are unable to agree upon terms of a new franchise, the franchise fee, if any, being imposed by the City at the time this franchise expires, will remain in effect until a new franchise is agreed upon. SECTION 8. LIMITATION ON APPLICABILITY. This Ordinance constitutes a franchise agreement between the City and the Company. No provision of this franchise inures to the benefit of any third person, including the public at large, so as to constitute any such person as a third -party beneficiary of the agreement or of any one or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action for any person not a party hereto. SECTION 9. PREVIOUS FRANCHISE SUPERSEDED. This franchise supersedes and replaces previous franchises granted to the Company or its predecessors. SECTION 10. AMENDMENTS. This ordinance may be amended at any time by the City. An amendatory ordinance becomes effective upon the filing of the Company's written consent thereto. SECTION 11. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this franchise is found unenforceable for any reason, the validity of the remaining provisions will not be affected. • • This Ordinance shall be effective upon passage and official publication. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council on this t' day of September, 2000. 3 obi John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • AGENDA ITEM 3 Q • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator October 23, 2000 Public Hearing and First Reading on Proposed Ordinance 15 -00 Establishing a Meter Fee for Customers of Reliant Energy Minnegasco 3/5 Vote BACKGROUND: The City's expired franchise agreement with Reliant Energy Minnegasco did not contain a franchise fee. In 1999 the City Council directed staff to negotiate a new agreement that included a franchise fee. That agreement is contained in proposed Ordinance 14 -00. In conjunction with the agreement, Ordinance 15 -00 establishes a meter fee equivalent to approximately 3% of the average customer bill in each category of customers. In August, letters were sent to more than 3,400 customers of Reliant Energy Minnegasco informing them of the proposed fee and opportunities to provide feedback. The City Administrator received and documented 28 phone calls opposing the meter fee. Ordinances require two readings and a public hearing. A public hearing for Ordinance 15 -00 was held September 25 and continued to October 9. The first reading was scheduled for October 9 and tabled in order to obtain additional information. The continued public hearing and the first reading of the ordinance are now scheduled for 7:00 p.m., October 23. The second reading is scheduled for November 13. ACTIONS: 1. Open the continued public hearing on Ordinance 15 -00 at 7:00 p.m. Continue public hearing to November 13 at 7:00 p.m. 2. Approve first reading of Ordinance 15 -00. 3. Schedule second reading of Ordinance 15 -00 for November 13, 7:00 p.m. OPTIONS: • 1. Approve first reading of Ordinance 15 -00 2. Postpone approval of first reading of Ordinance 15 -00 3. Do not approve first reading of Ordinance 15 -00 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Option 1 • • Lws /franchise /feegreen • • • Council Member adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 15-00 AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING A FRANCHISE FEE ON RELIANT ENERGY MINNEGASCO'S OPERATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The City of Lino Lakes Municipal Code is hereby amended to include reference to the following Ordinance. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The Lino Lakes City Council has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to impose a franchise fee or equivalent fee on those public utility companies that provide gas or electric services within the City. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 14 -00, a Franchise Agreement between the City and Reliant Energy Minnegasco ( "Minnegasco"), the City has the right to impose a franchise fee. Subd. 2. Franchise Fee. A franchise fee in the form of a per meter fee is hereby imposed on Minnegasco under its gas Franchise in the amount shown below, commencing with the Minnegasco January 2001 billing month. Note that this chart is for Year 2001 and amounts will increase 3% per year. Classification Monthly Fee Annual Fee Residential $ 1.50 $ 18.00 Commercial A $ 1.50 $ 18.00 Commercial B $ 3.50 $ 42.00 Commercial C $ 12.00 $ 144.00 SVDF -A $ 25.00 $ 300.00 SVDF -B $150.00 $1,800.00 • Subd. 3. Payment. The Fee shall be payable to the City in accordance with the terms set forth in the Franchise. Subd. 4. Surcharge. The City acknowledges that Minnegasco may choose to add the full amount of the Fee as a customer surcharge to reimburse the Company for the Fee. Minnegasco shall provide to the City a copy of the proposed customer bill line item describing the Fee thirty days before the first bill collecting the Fee is sent to customers. Subd. 5. Proof of Customer Usage. Minnegasco shall make each payment when due and shall quarterly furnish a complete and correct statement of customers for said quarter. Minnegasco shall permit the City and its designated representative reasonable access to the company's records for the purpose of verifying such statements. Subd. 6. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with the Franchise. Subd. 7. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of this Ordinance is from and after its passage and publication. SECTION 2. This ordinance takes effect as provided herein. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this _ day of , 2000. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Wm. G. Hawkins, City Attorney The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 23, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -101, Accept Donations for Family Turkey Shoot VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department sought program sponsors for its Family Turkey Shoot to be held on Saturday, November 11, 2000. The event is a free holiday event for the families of Lino Lakes that consists of low -key competition in a variety of athletic events for prizes. The Lino Lakes State Bank, as a program sponsor, has donated $350.00 to help defer the costs of this family event. Also, the Lino Lakes Lions Club, as a program sponsor, has donated $300.00 to help defer costs of this family event. Also, Circle Pines Lexington Lions Club, as a program sponsor, has donated $250.00 to help defer costs of this family event. Also, the Forest Lake Area Athletic Association (FLAAA), as a program sponsor, has donated $100.00 to help defer costs of this family event. Please find attached Resolution No. 00 -101 for your consideration. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 00 -101. 2. Do not approve Resolution No. 00 -101. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 10/18/00 RD /Corr /City Council /res 00 -101 • • Council Member adoption. introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -101 A RESOL UTIONACCEPTING DONATIONS FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT'S ANNUAL FAMILY TURKEY SHOOT WHEREAS, The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department is holding this annual holiday event on Saturday, November 11, 2000; and The event is a free holiday event for the families of Lino Lakes; and Participant teams, consisting of one child (ages 4 -14) and one adult, will compete in a variety of low -key athletic events for prizes; and WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, The following organizations were made aware of the desire of the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department to conduct the Family Turkey Shoot with the support of program sponsors and have donated the following amounts to the City to defer the costs of this event: Lino Lakes State Bank Lino Lakes Lions Club Circle Pines Lexington Lions Club Forest Lake Area Athletic Association $350 $300 $250 $100 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the donations to help fund the Family Turkey Shoot event and wishes to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to these fine organizations for their donations. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2000. John Bergeson, Mayor Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. • The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 23, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -102, Accept Donation from Forest Lake Area Athletic Association (FLAAA) VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: In 1999, the Forest Lake Area Athletic Association (FLAAA) contributed $2,500 for improvements to the City Hall Park - East Field. The donation under consideration this evening is for an additional $2,500 to assist in improving City Hall Park - West Field. Planned improvements include new fencing along the out -of -play areas, new player bench areas, and additional ag -lime. Estimated costs are approximately $6,000. The Park Board has approved funding up to $4,500 from the Park Dedication Fund to cover the difference. Please find attached Resolution No. 00 -102 for your consideration. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 00 -102. 2. Do not approve Resolution No. 00 -102. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 10/16/00 RD /Corr /City Council /donation /res 00 -102 • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -102 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE FLAAA WHEREAS, the Forest Lake Area Athletic Association (FLAAA) provides recreational opportunities for the youth of Lino Lakes and; WHEREAS, the FLAAA practices and schedules their games at the City Hall Park ballfields; and WHEREAS, the FLAAA has expressed their desire to assist the city in improving the ballfields at City Hall Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, the Council accepts the FLAAA donation of $2,500 to help finance improvements to City Hall Park West Field including new out of play fencing, players benches, and additional ag -lime. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of October, 2000. John Bergeson Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • AGENDA ITEM 7 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland MEETING DATE: October 23, 2000 TOPIC: Nancy Anderson, 325 Carl Street, Variance VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority DESCRIPTION: This case involves a request for a Variance from the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 4.D. Accessory Buildings and Structures, 1. General Provision. c. No detached accessory structure shall be closer to the front lot line then the principal building or its attached garage. Ms. Anderson has an existing home w /attached garage at 352 Carl Street. The property is Zoned Rural and located within the Lino Air Park. There are 23 lots within the Air Park. Four (4) have hangers in front of the dwelling (one of these four is not constructed yet but a Variance was granted in May of 2000), one (1) has an attached hanger, eight (8) have hangers on the side or behind the principal building, eight (8) have no hanger, and three (3) lots remain undeveloped. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The proposed hanger will be located approximately 125' from the front property line and 5.5' from the side property line. The Ordinance requires a 30' front and 5' side setback. The existing house & garage is approximately 190' from the front property line. Staff has received a letter form the adjoining property owners indicating no objection to the • • • proposed hanger location. We have also received comments from the Air Park Association indicating this proposed location is optimum for several reasons outlined in their letter. The main consideration is the 7/1 transition airspace required from the runway which could not be achieved if the structure were located behind the home as required by the Ordinance. For this reason Staff believes there is a hardship and would recommend approval of the variance request. For Council information we are considering an Ordinance Amendment that would allow accessory structures to be construction in front of the principal structure in the Rural Zoning District. However, this proposal will not be initiated until the Zoning Ordinance is updated some time next year. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this Variance at their 10/11/00 meeting and expressed concern regarding the 7/1 transition air space requirement. They recommended approval of the Variance pending clarification of this question. Staff reviewed the information and discussed the requirement with Air Park Board members. A drawing is attached detailing this information that was not available for the P & Z review. The Air Park Association has tried to be more diligent in recent years in maintaining their Covenants and enforcing this slope requirement. Some hangers were built in the late 1980's and early 90's that do not meet the requirement. These hangers are located on the east end of the field on Thomas Street. We have found, however, that this 7/1 transition air space requirement, while included in the Air Park Covenants, is not a required condition per MnDot Office of Aeronautics rules for a "private" air park. After discussion with Air Park Board members and review of the information provided we would recommend approval of the Variance as requested. The structure can not be located in the rear yard and meet the 7/1 slope requirement. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Variance Request 2. Deny Variance Request 3. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 -- PINE-STREET -- — ■ ®oyo Nii K a �I:'IN_i� Y Aurgaiiw sitimmr ��1:1 F1��Y ' 6 6 5 -COUNTY-- IWY- MONtMfiWAY-PCAT NO 50 -*MN - STREET — - 8 JJ' - 6-60NFV -NW I,-R16N MUM • 40F WA* PL-Af NNMWER -25 a AI2 l3 �fi ©22f RM 3 pmiir mmc��� tt © ®Do 0zil0 u f�l�ltT.� , 3 2 - —EZ LILAC m0 0 18 -- •A. -NO 153 —�� — uL *e- - —SIT SET— -� -- Ell M gar II 1111 ra on .t :� II 11).11 '® 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 7 73 5 Q BW 7k eki 2 �$ 2 .d 0 3 0P' 631.321 3 8 LINO LAKES L R EHABILITATIOq CENTER William J. Noel and Bonnie E. Bigler 346 Carl Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 September 15, 2000 Planning and Zoning Committee City of Lino Lakes Re: Proposed site of Anderson hangar at 352 Carl Street, Lino Lakes To Whom It May Concern: We the undersigned, neighbors immediately to the west the Andersons, have no objection to the Anderson family building a hangar on the north side of their property. As a matter of fact, we hope to build a hangar on the north side of our property in due course. We consider the north side preferable to the south side, as it will not block our view to the south and the east. Furthermore, grouping of the two buildings will make each less obtrusive. Please grant the Andersons a variance so they can proceed with plans to build their hangar. Thank you. ��cu�c�iiirc;r 1.`); 2000 Bonnie E. Bigler Please allow the Anderson's the variance for constructing a hanger on the north side of the property. My address is 360 Carl, the residence east of the Anderson property. soak, J'IttP1)tht Susan E. Freppert • • • Lino Airpark City of Lino Lakes We have reviewed the plans for a hanger at the Nancy Anderson residence. In our view the location and design she has selected is the optimum location for the hanger. This location is optimum for the following reasons: • The location is far enough away from the runway to not interfere with the 7 to 1 transition airspace surface. • This location provides adequate space for a taxiway to the hanger and provides for a logical flow of aircraft. • This location provides for smooth and efficient access of the hanger from the front street. • This location fits in well with the surrounding homes and appears to compliment the neighbors future plans for their hanger. As I'm sure you know, each home and hanger in the airpark association is quite unique and providing harmony is always a challenge. This location and design appears to provide a consistent character to the neighborhood and appears to fit well with the adjacent homes. We support approving this hanger location and design. Lino Airpark Roger Schroeder Glen Martig President Vice President Date: g David Hunter Secretary Date: 9 / -Q Date: Y -[ --0 Tom Schmelzer Airpark Engineer Date: 1€ c-56 • • TODD PETERSON urur4urz Gertifiratr Property located in Section 7, Township 31, Rnage 22, Minnesotanty%J-5:2- CARL STREET LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER TILE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North 812 -500 -3093 Fax No. 580 -3622 Minneapolis. Minnesota 65428 to- ¢IT'I 8' .6 - I50.2I — co ( 4 2- STori 1' 45.+ 0 q°°v In 3b5 -° —9.o.0 sop.) 1 714, 11io•r to 4.9 TOP 999.14 10.°.1 of 9919 e94.6 �Ig Ire o a b'y a }r9 inellieStO c c RESIPEi.1cE a M r7S �l er_15� 34.0 • b,p - t.Z.BO- 991r loo -o IH1.t, 1s...a a f4'0". e97.Y 071.9' esa 44 �.3 21.94 TP Emm 8i9 -07 I�u 157.33 Lot 7, Block 1, LINO AIR PARK NORTH The only easements shown ore, from plats of record or information' provided by client. We hereby certify that This is n True and correct representation of n survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the Z- UG &i49 INVOICE NO 47482 F.B.N O 758 -65, 780 -05 SCALE: 1" = 4o' O Denotes Iron Monument ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation 0000 Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved buiding plan and development or grading plan before excovation and construction. ')9I.5 Proposed Top of Block ‘3',9I,O Proposed Garage Floor 6‘)O-- Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building 5 covr4 4 4 Jr Note: Builder must verify setback requirements for hanger with City Planning Dept. b4 5 .t A A // Manger (20 yards= 69 (15' Eave) 1 a) col 0 0 Z 51' Set back for 7 -1 glide 30' Set back from outlot B • Front of Hous Back of House Sk 2 § 'ti u / A E •- y 7 £k o - ƒ / -ma /& r West Property line Property Lines in Magenta 1 J1 YL'- !!i1. "�i +l • 31/2 S -CT I L'. i T 3I Get v R 2f/v/ OR 7- z • 37'7 ,9 0, ft 90 ? va La Wi • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIM1IE STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT . STAFF PRESENT . October 11, 2000 6:30 P.M. 8:35 P.M. Corson, Johnson, Lane, Rafferty (arrived at 6:31 p.m.), Schilling, and Zych Schaps City Planner Smyser; City Engineer Powell; Economic Development Assistant Mary Alice Divine I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Acting Chair Lane called the Lino Lakes Plan 6:30 p.m., October 11, 2000. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Sep d Zoning Board meeting to order at 2000 Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to a ' e " e minutes of the September 13, 2000, meeting of the Lino Lakes Pl n: oning Board, and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4- chilling abstaining. Mr. Rafferty arrived at 6:31 p.m. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. IV. OPEN MIKE Acting Chair Lane declared open mike open at 6:33 p.m. No one was present for open mike. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:33 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 6 -0. Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. Nancy Anderson, 352 Carl Street, Variance Staff advised this case involves a request for a Variance from the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 4.D. Accessory Buildings and Structures, 1. General Provision. c. No detached accessory structure shall be closer to the front lot line then the principal buildings or its attached garage. Ms. Anderson has an existing home w /attached garage at 352 Carl Street. The property is Zoned Rural and located within the Lino Air Park. There are 23 lots within the Air Park. Four (4) have hangers in front of the dwelling (one of these four is not constructed yet but a Variance was granted in May of 2000), one has an attached hanger, eight (8) have hangers on the side or behind the principal building, eight (8) have no hanger, and three (3) lots remain undeveloped. Staff reviewed the findings of fact the City must consider for all variance requests. Staff advised the proposed hanger will be located approxi ely 125' from the front property line and 5.5' from the side property line. The exis se & garage is approximately 190' from the front property line. The Ordinan e uir- 30' front and 5' side setback requirement. Staff has received a letter from fining property owners indicating no objection to the proposed hanger location. _ taf so received comments from the Air Park Association indicating this propose optimum for several reasons outlined in their letter. The main con era is he 7/1- transition airspace required from the runway, which could not f the structure were located behind the home as required by the Ordinanc ° t reason staff believes there is a hardship and would recommend approval e request. For P & Z and Council inform taff is considering an Ordinance Amendment that would allow accessory structures "' be constructed in front of the principal structure in the Rural Zoning District. However, this proposal will not be initiated until the Zoning Ordinance is updated some time next year. Mr. Johnson asked for clarification regarding the proposed residence and what is west of the residence. Staff referred to a map noting the survey was done awhile back. There is an existing residence. Staff advised it is unclear as to what the lines west of the house area. Mrs. Anderson, applicant, stated the survey was done prior to building the house. The lines west of the house are measurements of lot lines. The lines were not intended to be a hanger. Mr. Johnson inquired where the aircraft will go after coming out of the hanger. Mrs. Anderson advised there will be a door and referred to its location on the map. She indicated she is unsure if the area will be grass. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 3 Mr. Corson stated there are houses out there that do not meet the 7/1 requirement. He asked if this is going to continue to be an issue. Staff advised the City assumes that one of the covenants would include a review by the Air Park. Staff stated it is assumed that the Air Park reviewed this issue before the houses were built. Mr. Rafferty asked for clarification regarding the 7/1 requirement of the Air Park. Staff advised the 7/1 requirement is a FAA requirement that applies to certain slopes at different parts of the runway. Mr. Rafferty stated that on the Thomas Street side there are hangers that go up to the houses. He expressed concern regarding the City having ordinances in place and creating variances for the homes there. The City needs to address these issues up front. He stated it may be time to review the current ordinance. Staff advised the City will be reviewing the ordinance next year. He suggested the Board approve the variance with the added condition that the 7/1- transition air space be verified. Mr. Rafferty inquired about guidelines the City may e in place regarding hanger structures. Mrs. Anderson advised the hanger will be i/z .� match the house. Mr. Schilling inquired about how often th requirements. Staff advised there is �; in issue. FAA and State Law apply. Board and inform Board members Mr. Schilling stated there is the hanger. He stated it woul regulations. updated regarding FAA e City ordinances that addresses this to have a consultant come before the his issue. wo -story structure that is closer to the airstrip than eficial for the Board to learn more about FAA Mr. Rafferty asked what the City would do if there is a conflict with the 7/1 requirement. Staff advised they will verify the 7/1- transition air space. If the hanger can go in between the house and runway, staff will not recommend approval. Mr. Rafferty stated the City has guidelines in place that it needs to follow. There are other hardships that at times need to be considered. He stated he wants to make sure the City is doing the right thing with adjusting variances. The City needs to look at hardships when the house is going in. The City can do a better job of addressing these issues ahead of time. Staff advised a lot of the houses were already built before the ordinance was revised. Acting Chair Lane stated she would like information regarding how long the 7/1 requirement has been in effect with the FAA. She stated that she assumes other houses were grandfathered in. Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 4 Staff advised it is a good idea to ask a Lino Air Park representative to come before the Board and address these issues. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the Variance Request contingent upon verification that the existing location of the hanger is outside the FAA 7/1 slope requirements for runways. The motion supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 6 -0. This item will appear on the October 23, 2000, Council meeting agenda. B. Mueller -Beis Funeral Home, 7050 Lake Drive, Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision Staff presented their analysis of the site plan review for the Mueller -Beis Funeral Home, 7050 Lake Drive. Staff advised the Environmental Board reviewed the project on September 27, 2000 and recommended approval of the project. Staff referred to a copy of their comments. One of the Board's concerns related to the OHW level on Rice Lake. For P & Z and Council information, the proposed co ctions meets the setback requirement from the OHW according to the City' - land Ordinance. The DNR has reviewed the plans and expressed no additional cerns h the proposed development. The RCWD tabled the site plan review at thei 0 meeting with authorization for administrative action (this is an approval 'th co ' 'ons). Staff advised the property in questio proposed to be split into two parce size and Parcel B will be 3.1 acres Anoka County. re parcel of land that is the Mueller -Beis site, will be 4.5 acres in ss right -of -way dedication required by The Zoning Ordinance provide imum lot area of 20,000 -sq. ft. for the General Business Zoning District with a m nimum frontage of 100'. Both proposed parcels exceed the Ordinance requirements. Parcel A is 500' in length and Parcel B is 446.5. Staff recommended approval of the Minor Subdivision with the dedication of 20 additional feet of right -of -way to Anoka County for the reconstruction of Lake Drive. A revised survey will be required prior to Council review indicating this land dedication, not easement dedication as indicated on the current site plan. Staff reviewed recommended conditions of approval of the minor subdivision and site plan review. Staff noted the applicant would like this item to appear on the October 23, 2000, regular Council agenda. Staff advised the City will not have time to review the revised plans. Therefore, the Council will review this item at the November 13, 2000, regular Council meeting. Acting Chair Lane stated Parcel A is the site for the funeral home. She asked what Parcel B will be used for. Staff advised the use for that site is unknown at this time. • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 5 Mr. Rafferty asked for clarification regarding the location of the parcels. Staff referred to a map indicating each parcel. Mr. Rafferty asked how the development works with the current Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Comprehensive Plan. Staff advised the area is currently guided for commercial but is zoned general business. There are some places in the City that the current Comprehensive Plan does not match up with the zoning map. Those areas need to be reviewed and cleared up. Mr. Rafferty stated the plan is a good plan. He expressed concern regarding the City making errors in spot development. There are townhomes, the Air Park, and a lot of residential in this area. He stated he is uncomfortable with the location of the building. He noted the area north of Elm is all commercial. Mr. Johnson stated the site backs up to Outlot B that is part of the Sea Plane. He asked what effect this development may have on the development of the outlot. Staff advised the outlot contains drainage and utility easements. Mr. Johnson clarified that a portion of Outlot B is happen to the remainder if it is ever developed. down that area. The property cannot be devel south. He asked what will d part of the runway goes The City Engineer added he also believes cannot be developed. Mr. Johnson asked if the 7/1 stand j s e in this case. He noted the building is fairly tall. The City Engineer advised t 3,= akex ommonly used for take off and landing. The land is not adjacent to this building. Mr. Schilling asked if someone will be living in the building on the second floor. Mr. Craig Miller, representative for Muller -Beis Funeral Home, came forward and stated in the course of this type of business, it is common to have an apprentice that lives on site. The apartment will be utilized for a person in training. Mr. Corson stated the primary concern is health and safety of the runway. He asked if the building will be on the side of the taxiway going uphill. Mr. Miller advised the owners are comfortable with the location. An extensive land search was done. He asked how much time is needed for the City to review a shared driveway agreement. The City Engineer advised conditions of approval include revisions of several plans. The report would have to be completed by next Wednesday to appear on the October 23, 2000 Council agenda. There is not enough time to review all the revisions. Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 6 Mr. Miller stated the owners are trying to get ahead of the winter weather that may delay construction. Acting Chair Lane advised this item will not go before Council until the November 13, 2000, meeting. Mr. Zych asked for clarification regarding the approval of the RCWD and the conditions of approval. The City Engineer explained the process used by the RCWD when approving a request with authorization for administrative action. Staff advised this practice is commonly used by the RCWD. The City Planner requested the following phrase be added to condition #6: and to provide sanitary sewer service to Parcel B. Staff advised the phrase will make it clear that sewer service will be provided for that parcel also. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve minor subdivision and site plan review, based on the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are obtained and i completion of site improvements. 2. The revised landscaping plan shall inc and is subject to review and approve,. by and obtain the approval of the Cit Council review. 3. Park Dedication shall be re 4. An additional 20 feet of ri Deed, prior to issuanc 5. A revised survey do 1% escrow deposit to insure ditional screening along Lake Drive staff. This plan shall be submitted ental Specialists prior to City City's Subdivision Ordinance. w N shall be dedicated to Anoka County by ding Permits. icating the right -of -way dedication, shall be provided prior to Coun > ew. 6. Engineering: plans shall b revised as indicated in the Engineer's report dated October 5, 2000 and to provide sanitary sewer service to Parcel B. 7. All lighting shall be directed downward and produce no glare on the roadway. 8. Approval of the site plan is not an implied approval of signage. An signs require a sign permit and must comply with the City's Sign Ordinance. 9. A shared driveway agreement shall be provided for the entrance drive. 10. Access permits shall be obtained from Anoka County Highway Department prior to construction on the site. A revised plan with a shared driveway will be submitted along with a shared driveway agreement. The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 5 -1 with Mr. Rafferty voting no. C. North American Composites Co., (Inter - Plastic) 300 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review & Minor Subdivision Staff advised the application includes a minor subdivision and a site and building plan review. North American Composites Company proposes to construct a new distribution • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 7 facility on the site. The company will also conduct repackaging of the product into different size containers on site as well as distribution. The product is polyester resins, fiberglass, and related products. Staff presented their analysis of the site and building plan review. Staff advised the Environmental Board reviewed the project on September 27, 2000. Recommendations included attention to infiltration in stormwater design, use of native species in the landscaping plan, assurance that lighting will be directed downward, and attention to soil compaction when possible. Infiltration will be designed in to the extent possible. Native seeds are included. Lighting will be directed downwards. The issues will be addressed with a revised landscaping plan to be reviewed by the Environmental Specialist. Staff recommended approval of the site plan based on conditions listed in the report and adding the following: 10. Park dedication per City policy. 11. Minor subdivision shall be as shown on sub including easements. d sketch and description Acting Chair Lane inquired about trash ands . Staff referred to the landscaping plan indicating the trash container. Mr. Johnson referred to elevation. H ate most visual part of the building is the least interesting. The City of Lino n doing itself a service with the building backs along the freeway. The plai i`. acks give a negative impression of the City. He asked if something more . ga, n be done. Staff advised that is one of the the City is recognizing more and more. It is always difficult to require more decoratio when the City does not have standards in place and there are already buildings there. In parts of the City, the City will be pushing for more aesthetically pleasing architecture in the future. Currently the City is trying to address that issue with landscaping. Mr. Corson stated the previous application required more park dedication. He inquired about the process used for park dedication. Staff advised park dedication depends on a ratio in the ordinance. There are two different types of commercial dedication based on the ratio of employees to square footage. Mr. Corson advised the City of Woodbury uses a park dedication fee of $3,000 per acre. He asked if the City has looked at what other cities use for park dedication. Staff advised the City is looking at revisions of the current park dedication ordinance. Acting Chair Lane asked if the applicant is comfortable with the two additional conditions of approval. The applicant indicated he is comfortable with the additional conditions. Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 8 Mr. Schilling asked if the applicant is open to some aesthetic issues on the south side of the building. Mr. Ivan Levy, Vice - President of North American Composites, came forward and stated he is open to adding to the building to dress it up. He noted the facility does not sell to the public. Acting Chair Lane asked the applicant to work with staff on the aesthetics of the back building. She directed staff to relay the Board's concerns to the City Council. Mr. Levy stated company engineers have indicated the City of Lino Lakes is a good city to work with. He stated his company only has two competitors, one that is right across the street from this location. Mr. John Johnson, engineer for the project, requested the following clarification on conditions #11: per RCWD requirements and the City Engineer's report. He noted the survey will be revised and resubmitted. Mr. Johnson inquired about the use of hazardous Mr. Levy commented on the products that are Staff advised condition #8 covers flamma Mr. Levy stated fire codes require to protect flammable materials. Mr. Rafferty stated he agre south side of the building. He appreciated. ted noting one is flammable. e stated his company goes much further Johnson's comments regarding aesthetics on the hat anything that can be done will be greatly Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to approve the site plan based on the following conditions: 1. Lighting fixtures shall be shielded and not direct light up or horizontally. The Lumark Nite -Watch fixture (F -4 on lighting plan) is not acceptable. A substitute shall be submitted for approval before City Council approval of the project. 2. Twenty -nine parking spaces shall be striped. 3. The decorative concrete block on the office portion of the building shall be identified for the building permit application to the satisfaction of the building official. 4. Another landscaping plan must be submitted and obtain the Environmental Specialist's approval before City Council approval. 5. The City Engineer's issues listed in the October 5, 2000 memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. The revisions to the utility and grading plans must be submitted and obtain the City Engineer's approval before City Council approval. • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 9 6. Final utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. 7. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 8. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. 9. Site plan approval does not imply approval of signage. Any signage shall conform to the sign ordinance and proper permits obtained. 10. Park dedication applies per City policy. 11. Minor subdivision shall be as shown on submitted sketch and description including easements per RCWD requirements and the City Engineer's report. The motion was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Zych excused himself from the meeting at 7:45 p.m. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Town Center Standards Staff advised the Town Center Committee •f Lin es citizens recommended special design standards for the Town Center bac " � he draft standards prepared by Calthorpe and Associates builds on t ee's framework. The standards will put o ��d into effect the vision for a Town C • t s formulated several years ago. The City Council endorsed the draft standar st 28, 2000. Final approval will include rezoning the land as well as a zoning ordinance to create a new zoning district and adopt the devel • a dards for it. As the discussion continues, it is c ear that confusion still exists over the need for development standards. The draft standards include more detail than the City is accustomed to seeing. The City is accustomed to seeing standards for minimum setbacks and maximum building heights: but maximum setbacks and minimum building heights is a switch. Though many cities have architectural standards regarding building materials, we are not accustomed to this in Lino Lakes. Additional architectural standards are even more disconcerting for some people here. A public hearing will be held for the zoning amendment action, but it has not been scheduled to date. Before the City does that, it is a good idea to revisit the Town Center vision. Mary Divine, the City's Economic Development Assistant, has prepared a presentation to demonstrate the need for the design standards. Ms. Divine presented a slide show relating to traditional neighborhood developments and the need for design standards. Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 10 Mr. Corson inquired about the Wal-Mart project in the City of Blaine. Staff advised the project includes a Wal-Mart, Home Depot, and Cub. The status of the project is unknown. Mr. Corson asked if there are developers who are ready to go ahead with this when approval is received. Staff advised there are developers who are interested. The City has been seeking developers out. Most cities don't have zoning ordinances that provide for this type of development. Mr. Corson stated he had been to the Metropolitan Council and viewed a list of applicants. He stated the idea of this type of development is catching on. Staff advised there were 46 applicants this year. This type of development is the way cities want to go. Mr. Corson advised staff he will provide them with the publication he received from the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Rafferty inquired about the City's chances of receiving the grant. Staff advised there were 46 applicants and 28 made it to the second pha `" he City of Lino Lakes scored high in the first round. The second round will be petitive. The Metropolitan Council wants to show that this type of develops nt can rk in the suburbs. The Metropolitan Council has $6.9 million dollars •le for funding. Mr. Schilling inquired about updates fro � since the original plan was submitted. Staff advised they have b w•; g rough several concerns and revisions that will allow more flexibility. Mr. Rafferty stated staff has hard on this project. He stated it was disappointing that staff eli itectural elements. The City Planner advised a tower ement was eliminated from the requirements, not the need for a visual focus. Staff advised they do not believe the tower element will be a significant loss. The Economic Development Assistant advised Board Members will receive revisions to the design standards. The changes will be noted. Acting Chair Lane asked if the City is making the property owners happy with the revisions. Staff advised the property owners have not seen the revisions. The City has not yet seen a development proposal for the whole parcel of land. The property owners want to sell the whole parcel. The City's best effort to date is trying to obtain a proposal for the whole parcel. Mr. Rafferty stated the City has a gold mine here. If the City starts watering things down, the City will be like every other city. The City has guidelines and staff has worked hard. The challenge is to keep the guidelines rigid and sooner or later development will occur. The development won't be done well if the guidelines are not rigid. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 11 Staff advised the land value over time will be much greater if this development is successful. Mr. Johnson stated housing densities have been an issue. The Council is divided regarding this issue. Higher density will bring a greater value to the property and more residents for customers of the businesses. The density number is a crucial one. He encouraged a high number of units per acre to increase the viability of the project. He stated there is also a concern regarding the mix of senior housing and townhomes. Mr. Rafferty stated he feels very comfortable that people who own something will protect it. He expressed concern regarding rental property. Mr. Johnson stated there is a pressing need for rental property in this area. There are a lot of people who work in Lino Lakes that can't afford to buy a home. Employers are concerned about that issue. Mr. Rafferty stated his business doesn't care where he lives. Businesses care about good employees. Staff advised prospective employers are lookin can live it. The City has committed to certain the apartments would be market rate. The esig types of buildings. a co unity that their employees elating to a housing mix. Most of dards will create unconventional B. Temporary Fabric Stora Staff advised some Board M ave seen a few temporary fabric structures around Lino Lakes. They . ade a metal pole frame with fabric stretched over it. People are using these structur =• nexpensive storage of vehicles or other items. City staff have received some calls abo +t these structures regarding placement and size. Most people just put them up without contacting the City. In discussions with the Building Official, staff decided it would be a good idea to inform the P & Z about how staff is addressing these structures. These structures are not addressed in the building code. No building permit is required. Staff has some concern about snow loading, but snow likely will slide off the fabric. Citizens who put up such a structure do so at their own risk, however. The placement of the structure and its size are two other issues. Staff will consider these fabric structures as accessory structures. As such, they must: 1) meet setback requirements for the zoning district, and; 2) the maximum accessory building square footage for the lot size will apply. • The aesthetics of these structures may be questioned, but the City has no ordinance to address that. Acting Chair Lane stated a good wind storm will take this type of structure down. Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 12 Mr. Schilling stated that if the City looks at these structures as an exterior storage issue, the City has provisions for screening. Staff advised the City will monitor this issue and determine how flexible the City should be. Mr. Johnson asked if there have been any complaints regarding the structures. Staff advised the City has not received any complaints. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:35 p.m., and was supported by Schilling. Motion carried 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kim Points, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. •