Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/13/2000 Council Packet• • AGENDA 6:00 P.M. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday November 13, 2000 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call: Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Minutes i) August 28, 2000, Council Minutes ii) September 6, 2000, Work Session Minutes iii) September 11, 2000, Council Minutes iv) September 20, 2000, Work Session Minutes v) September 25, 2000, Council Minutes vi) October 4, 2000, Work Session Minutes vii) October 9, 2000, Council Minutes B) Consideration of Expenditures: i) November 13, 2000 (Check No. 60280 - 60443 in the amount of $367,526.77) ii) Centennial Fire District C) Accept Donation to Fire District from the VFW Post 6583 Ladies Auxiliary Page 1 AGENDA • 2 Open Mike A. Reliant Energy Minnegasco, Al Swintek 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consider Resolution No. 00 -103, Supporting Re- appointment of Andy Cardinal to the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers (3/5 Vote Required) B) Consider Resolution No. 00 -106, Extending the Term of the Cable Franchise Granted to MediaOne North Central Communications Corp. d/b /a AT &T Broadband (3/5 Vote Required) C) Community Service Officer Job Offer (Report to follow on Thursday) 4. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner 7. Community Development Department Report • A) Site Plan Review, Mueller Bies Funeral Home, 7050 Lake Drive, Mary Kay Wyland (3 /5th Vote) B) Site Plan Review, North American Composites(Inter - Plastic) 300 Apollo Drive, Jeff Smyser (3 /5th Vote) C) Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for North American Composites, Mary Alice Divine (3 /5th Vote) D) Clearwater Creek Business Center — Amending Conditions of Approval, Jeff Smyser (3 /5th Vote) E) Final Plat — Clearwater Creek Business Center, Jeff Smyser (3 /5th Vote) F) Resolution 00 -105, Electing to Continue Participation in Livable Communities Program, Jeff Smyser (3 /5th Vote) G) PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 107, Adopt Assessment Roll, Clearwater Creek 4th Addition (3/5 Vote Required) H) PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 108, Adopt Assessment Roll, • Highland Meadows West (3/5 Vote Required) Page 2 AGENDA I) PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 109, Adopt Assessment Roll, IIIPheasant Hills Preserve 11th Addition (3/5 Vote Required) • • J) PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 110, Adopt Assessment Roll, Trappers Crossing 3rd Addition (3/5 Vote Required) K) PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 111, Adopt Assessment Roll, Individual Properties Which Requested Connection (3/5 Vote Required) L) PUBLIC HEARING — Bluebill Ponds Utility and Street Improvements M) Resolution 00 -112, Bluebill Ponds, Order the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications (3/5 Vote Required) N) Resolution 00 -113, 1999 Sealcoating Project, Approve Final Payment (3/5 Vote Required) 0) Resolution 00 -114, Main Street Trunk Utilities, Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract (3/5 Vote Required) P) Resolution 00 -115, Approve Easement Grant to the Metropolitan Council, Centerville Interceptor (3/5 Vote Required) 8. Unfinished Business 9. New Business 10. Community Calendar, November 14 through November 27, 2000: A) Wednesday, November 15, 2000, 6:00 p.m., Special Council Work Session B) Wednesday, November 22, 2000, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session C) Thursday, November 23, 2000, Thanksgiving Day -City Hall Closed D) Friday, November 24, 2000, City Hall Closed E) Monday, November 27, 2000, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 11. Adjourn Revised 11/7/00 jmp 10:OOAM Page 3 • AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY NOVEMBER 13, 2000 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration of Minutes of Monday, August 14, 2000 3. Public hearing: Proposed Business Subsidy to North American Composites 3A. Consideration of Resolution No. 00 -04 Approving a Business Subsidy for North American Composites 4. Consideration of Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and North American Composites 5. Adjourn • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES DATE MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT : August 14, 2000 : J. Bergeson, D. Carlson, C. Dahl, J. O'Donnell, J. Reinert (6:15 p.m.) : None : Brian Wessel, Mary Divine, Ron Batty CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF MONDAY, JANUARY 24, 2000 EDA Member Dahl moved to approve the January 24, 2000 utes, as presented. EDA Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion passed un ously. CONSIDERATION OF TIF POLICY Mr. Wessel advised the board that Ms. Divine has bee orking closely with Marmon/Keystone and Twin City Fab, Inc., fo " st f months. The actions tonight begin a series of actions regarding these project r. essel reviewed the proposed schedule relating to each project. Ms. Divine advised in 1995 a TIF as a proved that gave direction for qualifying projects for TIF. Since then Cit s` t up the Apollo Business Park and several projects in the Clearwater r ` Indus ia1 area. With the momentum the City has gained over those five years, EDAC re ecand recommended some changes to the TIF policy to help reduce the City's dependen e on TIF to attract new industrial development, while leaving the City Council discretion to go beyond the policy when it is appropriate. Under the new draft policy: 1. Prospects must continue to qualify according to the selection criteria. 2. TIF will be sued to pay qualifying reimbursable costs, with landscaping and site preparation added as a qualifying cost. 3. Land write down will continue on the basis that construction of 10,000 square feet (or more) of facility per acre of land is considered best use of the land. 4. Each project will be self sufficient within the allowable TIF capacity of the district. 5. TIF commitments will not exceed 16% of the estimated market value. This is a reduction from the old policy, which allowed 20% of the total project cost. • • 6. Administrative fees (upfront escrow) will be reimbursed using TIF funds at the completion of the project. This has traditionally been part of the agreements. 7. Assessments will be paid up front in the Apollo Business Park to allow for a more expedient return of the City's investment in the park's improvements. 8. In other TIF districts, the subsidy for land and assessments will be on a pay -as- you-go basis. This is a change from the old policy, which generally split the subsidy into approximately 50/50 upfront and pay -as- you -go. 9. If the subsidy includes upfront payments of assessments, the City will be reimbursed first from available increment. The grantee will receive its pay -as- you-go after the City is paid back. This is more restrictive than in the past, generally the City and the grantee split the increment. 10. The source of the 10% local contribution will be identified before the project is approved. EDA Member O'Donnell asked if the TIF commitment of 16% is a minimum or estimate of the market value. Ms. Divine advised the minimum and estimated market values are generally the same. EDA Member Carlson suggested the following be a. did o the "Prospects are not competitors with or replacets for existing local businesses." Ms. Divine advised there is a compan competitor for an existing business EDA Member Carlson asked the businesses is leasing spat ently a prospect and would be a es are under TIF. Ms. Divine advised one of EDA President Bergeson stated the problem with the addition to the policy is that typically these types of businesses are not dependent upon locations. He stated the City would not want to turn down a business that is an asset to the community because of competition with an existing business. EDA Member Carlson advised she was thinking about the addition to the policy more for tax abatement than TIF relating to bars /restaurants and convenience stores. Tax abatement to these types of businesses would give them a strong competitive edge to existing businesses in the community. Ms. Divine advised the board they would be addressing that issue separately during the discussion of the tax abatement policy. EDA Member O'Donnell moved to approve the TIF policy, as presented. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. • PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED BUSINESS SUBSIDY TO MARMON/KEYSTONE Ms. Divine informed the board that Marmon/Keystone has requested tax increment financing (TIF) assistance in the amount of $322,242 for the purpose of constructing an 80,000 square foot distribution facility in the Apollo Business Center. The company has been in business for 90 years as an entity, with a Minnesota location for the past four years as a distributor of tubing and piping, mainly for the agricultural industry. The local distributor currently employs 11, including warehouse, drivers, office and sales. The company has committed to hiring at least four new employees at no less than $15 per hour, plus benefits, which include medical, sick leave and vacation. This is well above the minimum established in the EDA's business subsidy requirement. The proposed facility will have a minimum market value of $3,152,600 for a total of $145,509 in annual taxes (based on 2000 dollars). According to the Minnesota Business Subsidy law, the EDA wst hold a public hearing before granting a subsidy that exceeds $100,000. In additi. ; to-increasing the tax base, the granting of a subsidy can be evaluated in terms of w c °th {.romotes one or more of the following: 1. Encourage economic and commercial dive 2. Contribute to the establishment of within an area; 3. Provide basic goods and s available or encourage f 4. Promote redevelopm ves within the community; s of commercial development inc - ase the range of goods and services finesses; nd removal of blight, including pollution cleanup; 5. Promote the reten significance; 6. Promote additional or spin -off development within the community; 7. Encourage full utilization of existing or planned infrastructure improvements. ptive use of buildings of historical or architectural EDA President Bergeson opened the public hearing at 6:20 p.m. EDA Member Dahl moved to close the public hearing at 6:20 p.m. EDA Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 00 — 03 APPROVING A BUSINESS SUBSIDY FOR MARMON/KEYSTONE Ms. Divine advised light industrial projects in the Apollo Business Center are consistent with the City's comprehensive plan designed to encourage economic growth and diversity. As part of the Lino Lakes Town Center, the projects moving into the park play a significant role in providing a critical mass of development to support retail and service • • • businesses in the commercial center. This project is also consistent with the City's need to recover the return on its investment in the existing infrastructure within the park. This resolution recognizes that Marmon/Keystone meets the goals and objectives outlined by the EDA in its business subsidy criteria. This project must go through a series of approvals, including approval of the development agreement, site and building plan and conditional use permit. The City Council will be considering the site plan and CUP at the August 28, 2000, Council meeting. It is recommended that approval of the business subsidy be contingent upon final approval of the project by the City Council. EDA Member O'Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 00 — 03 contingent upon final approval of the project by the City Council. EDA Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN LINO LAKES EDA AND MARMON/KEYSl'ONE Ms. Divine advised this development contract outlines: to con d" ins for pubic assistance to Marmon/Keystone for the construction of an 8 ® Ok + are foot facility on 8 acres on the G.M. Development property in the Apollo Busin Center. The total market value (MMV) of the completed project will be $3,1 In this agreement, the City agrees to p which amount to approximately 10 assessments of $139,839 upfront company when the building i $177,403. It will be used t crement financing totaling $322,242, The agreement removes the escrow, which will be returned to the e remaining pay -as- you -go TIF amounts to the cost of the land, except for $3,000, which will be used to assist with maintenan • t= e native landscaping on the site The City will be reimbursed first for the assessment: and then the developer will receive the remaining increment. Estimated payback is in December 2005. This project is in TIF District 1 -9, which requires a 10% local contribution ($38,994). It is the City's intent to apply the interest lost on the assessments that were deferred until development occurred as the local contribution. EDA Member Carlson asked staff to explain the reason for the 10% local contribution. Ms. Divine advised state stature requires that for any tax increment assistance, the City pays 10% of the gross increment towards the project out of the General Fund. EDA Member Carlson moved to approve the contract for private development between Lino Lakes EDA and Marmon/Keystone, as presented. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. 4 • CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN LINO LAKES EDA AND TWIN CITY FAB, INC. Ms. Divine advised this development contract outlines the conditions for public assistance to Twin City Fab for the construction of a 19,200 square foot facility on 4 acres on the G.M. Development property in the Apollo Business Center. The total minimum market value (MMV) of the completed project will be $920,500, with an estimated tax of $41,041 In this agreement, the City agrees to provide tax increment financing totaling $77,185, which amounts to approximately 8% of the MMV. The agreement removes the assessments of $70,185 upfront, plus a $5000 escrow, which will be returned to the company when the building is complete. The remaining pay -as- you -go TIF amount of $2000 will be used to assist with maintenance of the native landscaping on the site. The City will be reimbursed first for the assessments and then the developer will receive the remaining increment. Estimated payback is in July 2005. The project is in TIF District 1 -9, which requires a 10% to i contribution ($8,749). It is the City's intent to apply the interest lost on the assess wit . were deferred until development occurred as the local contribution. The business subsidy proposed for Twin City Fab, Inc., under $100,000, and therefore does not require a public hearing under the Mi . to B ess Subsidy Law. However, al subsidies of more than $25,000 require a bus a`� ®sidy agreement, which is now included in the development agreeme twee the developer and the EDA. Twin City Fab has agreed to a w .n`� •b goal of at least five new employees at a minimum starting wage of $ o emus a;- efits. EDA President Bergeson request escription of the business. Ms. Divine advised Twin City Fab, Inc. is a manufact ng shop with metal parts, awnings, staircases, etc. EDA Member O'Donnell moved to approve the contract between Lino Lakes EDA and CJN Investments, LLP, as presented. EDA Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT EDA Member Dahl moved to adjourn. EDA Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m. Transcribed by: • Kim Points, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 5 --------- q11 ILP ra II 111.11111, MN PO*P NUlieeR 11111 1111111111E 111.71e ) 17411111111111211111111111IN 0000 ©� OfITLOT LINO A 1A1 PARK to 1111[11111111,91- 111ENOrgars 24cEti 11111■1111C11111 za F of 1111211E110111 OL A I FARM • MUM ...toe — - - - An ion IN NM II 113 E MN g 113111161ECII= sl INCWIERAWn man maw-Dam = Isourpra_n° En/ Mr LI :WL1 WI MN alatilarul Immo onaliaolni mum Ella 1111111111111 111111111111111 7111 •11:4 v4 41 1 CD,rnft• ttruRY7 3 0 ) 11111 0E3 EOM ;OEM in MEI (EMI 1:0631 8 liii.„, alai 141 EI we, VI 4.-W. • • / IM/A11111,,PA4 ARC P°100 /Alan:10006CM] ° 111111 11611131111M CI Nip tc" um EBILLIES ICI MCI Mul Wiz ay nif Enaz, 2SUF3. NO. MARSH/ ection the ( orded ty of ' at P, Aoke I urnecl theashi 'theca /8 of South :8 soul It lre, to M. minute! awe • • • AGENDA ITEM 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 11/13/00 TOPIC: Public Hearing on the proposed business subsidy to North American Composites Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: North American Composites, a subsidiary of Interplastic Corporation, has requested tax increment financing (TIF) assistance in the amount of $122,250 for the purpose of constructing a 25,000 square foot distribution facility in the Apollo Business Center. North American Composites is a national distributor of polyester resins, fiberglass, and related products to the composites industry. The local distributor will employ 21 at this new facility, including management, warehouse, drivers, office and sales positions. The company has committed to hiring at least three new employees within two years at no less than $25,000 annual salary, plus benefits. A public hearing is required by statute when the EDA is considering granting a subsidy that exceeds $100,000. OPTIONS: 1. Open the public hearing 2. Continue the public hearing RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 11/13/00 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 00 -04 approving the proposed business subsidy to North American Composites VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: This resolution recognizes that North American Composites meets one or more of the goals and objectives outlined by the EDA in its business subsidy criteria. Those goals include: 1. Light industrial projects in the Apollo Business Center are consistent with the city's comprehensive plan designed to encourage economic growth and diversity. 2. As part of the Lino Lakes Town Center, the projects moving into the park play a significant role in providing a critical mass of development to support retail and service businesses in the commercial center. 3. This project is also consistent with the city's need to recover the return on its investment in the existing infrastructure within the park. This project will be receiving site and building plan review later tonight by the City Council. It is recommended that approval of the business subsidy be contingent upon final approval of the project by the City Council. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 00 -04 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 00 -04 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVING BUSINESS SUBSIDY TO NORTH AMERICAN COMPOSITES BE IT RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority as follows: Section 1. Recitals 1.01. The Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "Authority ") approved a tax increment financing plan (the "Plan ") for the Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -9 (TIF District No. 1 -9) on December 14, 1998. 1.02. On December 14, 1998, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") approved the Plan. 1.03 On November 8, 1999, following a public hearing, the Authority approved the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority Business Subsidy Criteria (the "Criteria "), pursuant to • Minnesota Statute, sections 1167.993 through 116J.995 (the `Business Subsidy Act. ") 1.04. North American Composites Company, a subsidiary of Interplastic Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, (the "Developer ") has requested a business subsidy through tax increment financing in the amount of $122,250 for the construction of a light industrial facility in the Apollo Business Center. • 1.05. Pursuant to Section 116J.994, subd. 5 of the Business Subsidy Act, the Authority has on this date held a public hearing on the proposed subsidy to the Developer, following published notice as required by law, at which hearing all persons wishing to express an opinion were given an opportunity to do so. Section 2. Findings. 2.01. It is hereby found and determined that the business subsidy is in the best interest of the Authority because it is consistent with and promotes the goals established by the Authority in adopting the Criteria. 2.02. It is hereby found and determined that granting the business subsidy to the Developer furthers the Authority's general plan of economic development of the community by encouraging growth and expansion of an industrial park which has not been used to its full potential. 2.03. Pursuant to the Criteria established by the Authority, it is hereby found and determined that the business subsidy promotes the following: • • • 1. Encourages economic and commercial diversity within the community; 2. Contributes to the establishment of a critical mass of commercial development within an area; and 3. Encourages full utilization of existing or planned infrastructure improvements. Section 3. Authorization. 3.01. The business subsidy to the Developer as described above is hereby approved. 3.02. The President and Acting Executive Director are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Development Agreement, including the business subsidy agreement required by the Business Subsidy Act, and other appropriate documents to facilitate the finalization of the business subsidy to the Developer. 3.03. Staff and consultants are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary or convenient to effect the intent of this resolution, including seeking approval of the subsidy from the Lino Lakes City Council. Dated: , 2000. President ATTEST: Acting Executive Director The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: AGENDA ITEM 4 Mary Alice Divine 11/13/00 Consideration of the Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and North American Composites 3/5 BACKGROUND: This development contract outlines the conditions for public assistance to North American Composites for the construction of a 25,000 square foot facility on 2.4 acres on the G.M. Development property in the Apollo Business Center (see attached map). The proposed facility will have a minimum market value of $938,400 for a total of $42,000 in annual taxes (based on pay 2001 dollars). The costs for land, assessments and escrow are approximately $226,000. In this agreement, the city agrees to provide tax increment financing totaling $122,250 towards those costs. The agreement removes the assessments of $63,877 upfront. The remaining pay -as- you -go TIF amounts to $58,373 for assistance with land write down and return of escrow. The city will be reimbursed first for the assessments from the available tax increment, and then the developer will receive the remaining increment. Estimated total payback is in 2007. This project is in TIF District 1 -9, which requires a 10% local contribution ($13,753). It is the city's intent to apply the interest lost on the assessments that were deferred until development occurred as the local contribution. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the contract for private development between Lino Lakes EDA and North American Composites 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 KED L/ NL U l-0 Pr • Section 5.1. Stiecial Assessments. The City has levied or will levy S against the Property in the principal amount of $63,877 for the Public Improvements been constructed and which benefit the Property. pecial Assessments p which have The Authority agrees to the time of issuance of a11 the -' the Special Assessments against the Pro pert Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements Y at principal and interest at-a • Section 5.2. Administrative Fee. - , Administrative Fee in the The Developer has paid the Authority the negotiatin amount of $5,000 to partially cover the Authority's expenses in g this Agreement and other costs associated with the project. The Authority agrees to reimburse the Developer for the Administrative Fee • • ouvailable Tax In r t Section 5.3. Pro ert In order to facilitate the financial development of the Property and in consideration for the Developer's fulfillment and obligations under this Agreement, the Authorit a ree feasibility of the and obl for the Developer. The Developee re thoii P down the its covenants t f the Y agrees has entered down the cost e the urchase the Property from the Seller for $'�g is that it has entered into an agreement to the Authority a copy of . The Developer agrees to reimburse the Developer $ 3x373 out of Available veloper agrees to Y the price Increment the Property. The of the Property. va>lable Tax Increment for the cost financial commitment under this Agreement Section 5.4. No Re resentation Re din. Ava „ Available Tax Increment. The Authority's en f the e.�,..• —_Pry !-� ri D� Authority only s a revenue obligation only and will be paid by the y after Tax Increment has been used to fully pay for the Special Assess including principal and interest, n he menu, n ai b I n . The Authority makes no representations or . warranties that the Available Tax Increment will be sufficient to pay the Developer for the Land Write Down and Tax Increment is subject to calculations by the County and changes in The Developer acknowledges that Available all of the Land Write Down g State law and that some or made prior to the Termination Date. The Developer lalso acknowledges r >tm� rcPmpnt may not be Available Tax Increment which may have been made by the Authority are estimates only and are not intended for reliance g s that the estimates of y or its agents, officers or ance by the Developer. • RHB- 188393v2 LN140 -74 • (i) For purposes of this Article X, the Developer includes any part to w Developer leases the Property or Minimum Improvements. Y hom the Section 10.2. Job and Wa e Goals. Within two years after the earlier of the issuance of the Certificate of Completion or the date the Developer occupies the date of "Compliance Date "), the Developer shall cause to be created at least Pthreee new e ll ime equivalent jobs on the�egand shall cause the wages for the three new employees less than , poe new full -time r, exc1ue of benefits. Notwithstanding anything to be no herein, if the wage and job goals described in this Section 10.2 are met by the Co o the contrary those goals are deemed satisfied despite the Developer's continuing obligations u der Se Date, 10.1(f) and 10.4. The Authority may, after a public hearing, extend the Compliance der t ebyo p to one year, provided that nothing in this Section 10.2 will be construed to limit the Authority's by up legislative discretion regarding this matter, uthority's Section 10.3. Remedies. If the Developer fails to meet the goals described in Section the Developer shall repay the Authority a pro rata share of the amount of granted by g coon y this Agreement, plus interest on said amount at the implicit price deflator as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.50, subd. 2, accrued from the date of is Certificate of Completion to the date of payment. suance of the within thirty (30) days of written demand y the Authority. The term roe at the Developer percentages calculated as follows: P a share means (i) if the failure relates to the number of jobs, the jobs required less the jobs created, divided by the jobs required; (ii) if the failure relates to wages, the number of jobs required less the number of jobs that meet the required wages, divided by the number of jobs required; (iii) if the failure relates to maintenance of the warehouse /distribution facility in accordance with Section 10.1(f), 60 less the number of months of operation as a warehouse /distribution facility (where any month in which the facility is in operation for at least 15 days constitutes a month of operation), commencing on the date of the Certificate of Completion ending with the date the facility ceases operation as determined by the Authority, divided by 60; and ed (iv) if more than one of clauses (i) through (iii) apply, the sum of the a percentages, not to exceed 100 %. Pp lica ble Nothing in this Section 10.3 shall be construed to limit the Authority's remedies and Article IX hereof. In addition to the remedy described in this Section 10.3 and any other er emed available to the Authority for failure to meet the goals stated in Section 10.1(c), the Devy o agrees and understands that its may not a receive a business subsidy from the Authority or any grantor as defined in the Business Subsidy Act for a period of five years from the date of the failure or until the Developer satisfies its repayment obligation under this occurs first. Section 10.3, •ichever RHB- .188393v2 LN 140 -74 17 • EXPENDITURES NOVEMBER 13, 2000 • • Date: 10/27/2000 Time: 09:41:42 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) • Entry Journal #: (R) 1283 - 1283 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000052 A T & T 1 65.62 65.62 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 383.71 383.71 .00 .00 000106 US WEST 1 161.13 161.13 .00 .00 000118 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, INC. 1 33.50 33.50 .00 .00 000134 BOLDT, ROBERT 1 184.96 184.96 .00 .00 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 119.20 119.20 .00 .00 000223 SPRING LAKE PARK, CITY OF 1 1,669.20 1,669.20 .00 .00 000224 ST. FRANCIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 1,290.52 1,290.52 .00 .00 000403 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF 1 2,282.17 2,282.17 .00 .00 000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #14 1 543.26 543.26 .00 .00 000508 NELSON, KRISTEN 1 49.00 49.00 .00 .00 011, ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY 1 2,192.00 2,192.00 .00 .00 000512 VILLAGE PROFILE 1 345.00 345.00 .00 .00 000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 1 108.71 108.71 .00 .00 001101 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 1,058.82 1,058.82 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 1,096.09 1,096.09 .00 .00 001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER, INC 1 97.98 97.98 .00 .00 001193 C M S HOLDINGS, INC. 1 90.00 90.00 .00 .00 001247 CROWN TROPHY, INC. 1 284.35 284.35 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 441.96 441.96 .00 .00 001630 GOA COMPANY, INC. 1 36.37 36.37 .00 .00 001709 GRAFFCO, INC. 1 21.15 21.15 .00 .00 Date: 10/27/2000 Time: 09:41:43 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Ve or # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 539.50 539.50 .00 .00 001881 HUGO HEATING AND COOLING 2 481.00 481.00 .00 .00 001932 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1 3,795.79 3,795.79 .00 .00 002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 348.00 348.00 .00 .00 002208 LELS 1 132.00 132.00 .00 .00 002332 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 1 146.44 146.44 .00 .00 002770 MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY 1 118.97 118.97 .00 .00 002822 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC 1 610.67 610.67 .00 .00 002890 MILLER, CHRIS 1 315.00 315.00 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 1 920.00 920.00 .00 .00 003091 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1 264.00 264.00 .00 .00 003193 NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 1,761.00 1,761.00 .00 .00 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 13,465.18 13,465.18 .00 .00 003757 REMEMBER ME FLORAL & GIFTS, INC. 1 190.62 190.62 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 291.49 291.49 .00 .00 004388 TEAMSTER LOCAL 320 1 689.00 689.00 .00 .00 01110 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 1 15.98 15.98 .00 .00 004709 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 1 2,945.00 2,945.00 .00 .00 900357 EMPIRE ELECTRIC 1 80.50 80.50 .00 .00 900443 SHERBURNE COUNTY GOVERMNENT CENTER 1 140.00 140.00 .00 .00 900485 SMITH, MARK 1 5.00 5.00 .00 .00 900524 BURGER, LUANN 1 486.00 486.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 45 40,295.84 40,295.84 .00 .00* • Date: 11/01/2000 Time: 11:59:31 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) • Entry Journal #: (R) 1292 - 1292 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000051 A T & T 1 3.28 3.28 .00 .00 000106 US WEST 1 58.18 58.18 .00 .00 000368 BML BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000513 GERBER, RICK 1 192.28 192.28 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 323.30 323.30 .00 .00 001255 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 1 641.80 641.80 .00 .00 001527 - FOREST LAKE AREA 1 780.00 780.00 .00 .00 002467 MAC MAY HOMES 1 475.00 475.00 .00 .00 002540 MEDICA 1 20,756.46 20,756.46 .00 .00 003492 PETTY CASH 1 280.31 280.31 .00 .00 003757 REMEMBER ME FLORAL & GIFTS, INC. 1 111.84 111.84 .00 .00 4111 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 3 491.00 491.00 .00 .00 004059 SMYSER, JEFF 1 305.43 305.43 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,528.00 1,528.00 .00 .00 004485 TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS INC. 1 22.46 22.46 .00 .00 004603 UNITED WISCONSIN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 787.27 787.27 .00 .00 004765 WARGO NATURE CENTER 1 270.00 270.00 .00 .00 004836 WOOD, SANDIE 1 75.98 75.98 .00 .00 900066 AVALON HOMES 1 475.00 475.00 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 6 303.56 303.56 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 27 28,381.15 28,381.15 .00 .00* • Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:26:30 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: • Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1304 - 1310 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000052 A T & T 1 43.55 43.55 .00 .00 000063 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. 1 51.59 51.59 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 2 422.39 422.39 .00 .00 000094 PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. 1 3,373.92 3,373.92 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 2 518.25 518.25 .00 .00 000106 QUEST 1 3.60 3.60 .00 .00 000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 659.96 659.96 .00 .00 000120 ST. JOSEPH'S CHURCH 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 000146 CIATTI'S RESTAURANT 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 000148 NEIL ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 67.95 67.95 .00 .00 000176 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 154.34 154.34 .00 .00 0• AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 4 135.87 135.87 .00 .00 000219 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING, INC. 2 290.23 290.23 .00 .00 000264 MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. 1 38.28 38.28 .00 .00 000265 NASH SALES, INC. 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 54.37 54.37 .00 .00 000340 ANDERSON, MARILYN 1 1,250.00 1,250.00 .00 .00 000370 ANOKA COUNTY 3 1,161.45 1,161.45 .00 .00 000390 ANOKA COUNTY 1 626.78 626.78 .00 .00 000430 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 1 28.00 28.00 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 979.81 979.81 .00 .00 • Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:26:36 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Ver�Qr # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000471 APITZ GARAGE, INC. 1 667.78 667.78 .00 .00 000493 ASSET RECOVERY CORPORATION 1 1,068.25 1,068.25 .00 .00 000514 GCS SERVICE, INC. 1 171.61 171.61 .00 .00 000515 IMC SALT, INC. 1 1,977.76 1,977.76 .00 .00 000516 NEIL NELSON & ASSOCIATES 1 175.00 175.00 .00 .00 000517 SIGNATURE TITLE COMPANY 1 27.74 27.74 .00 .00 000518 ZAHL EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 1 319.39 319.39 .00 .00 000705 BRW, INC. 1 12,912.19 12,912.19 .00 .00 000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 91.31 91.31 .00 .00 000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 2 177.93 177.93 .00 .00 000833 BROCK WHITE, INC. 1 347.19 347.19 .00 .00 000900 - BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 1,653.30 1,653.30 .00 .00 000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 1,332.98 1,332.98 .00 .00 001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 2 99.00 99.00 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 15.20 15.20 .00 .00 01111, CONNEXUS ENERGY 2 14,741.68 14,741.68 .00 .00 001211 COUNTRY INN - WHITE BEAR LAKE 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 001230 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 3 410.90 410.90 .00 .00 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 237.90 237.90 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 27.67 27.67 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 3,134.87 3,134.87 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 2,337.65 2,337.65 .00 .00 001309 DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC. 1 678.86 678.86 .00 .00 001350 E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. 1 566.00 566.00 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 6,253.71 6,253.71 .00 .00 001511 FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA, NA 1 149.00 149.00 .00 .00 • Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:26:40 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Vig # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001520 FLANAGAN SALES, INC. 1 2,217.00 2,217.00 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 770.11 770.11 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 95.79 95.79 .00 .00 001932 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1 3,567.32 3,567.32 .00 .00 002053 J. R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL, INC. 1 1,152.00 1,152.00 .00 .00 002110 KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. 1 10.06 10.06 .00 .00 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 49.45 49.45 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 6.15 6.15 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS 1 38.13 38.13 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 4 729.79 729.79 .00 .00 002553 MERCURY WASTE SOLUTIONS, INC. 1 133.96 133.96 .00 .00 002700 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 1 54.85 54.85 .00 .00 002743 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 003090 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 2 183.70 183.70 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 2,723.14 2,723.14 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 102.20 102.20 .00 .00 011111. PERA /REGULAR 1 13,838.01 13,838.01 .00 .00 003452 PERA /COUNCIL 1 213.28 213.28 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 17 1,660.36 1,660.36 .00 .00 003619 PRINT CENTRAL 1 142.84 142.84 .00 .00 003757 REMEMBER ME FLORAL & GIFTS, INC. 1 53.78 53.78 .00 .00 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 9 22,284.40 22,284.40 .00 .00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 109.00 109.00 .00 .00 003973 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 004125 ST. PAUL CITY OF 1 340.00 340.00 .00 .00 004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 78.00 78.00 .00 .00 • Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:26:43 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount V # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004320 SY /COM, INC. 1 5,644.83 5,644.83 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 695.34 695.34 .00 .00 004350 T.K.D.A. 35 164,439.11 164,439.11 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 91.30 91.30 .00 .00 004416 THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES 1 350.00 350.00 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 735.13 735.13 .00 .00 004510 TRUCK UTILITIES, INC. 1 58.91 58.91 .00 .00 004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC. 2 399.05 399.05 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 11,475.12 11,475.12 .00 .00 004664 VESSCO, INC. 1 456.06 456.06 .00 .00 004670 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS 1 1,234.42 1,234.42 .00 .00 004671 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 417.17 417.17 .00 .00 0050021 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. 1 298.00 298.00 .00 .00 900464 GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES OF MN, INC. 1 750.00 750.00 .00 .00 900477 PARTS ASSOCIATES, INC. PAI 1 121.96 121.96 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 2 346.90 346.90 .00 .00 • Grand Totals: 172 298,849.78 298,849.78 .00 .00* Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:34:27 Operator: JAL • Ranges: Options: Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) 1284 - 1311 (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 60281 60283 0 60284 60325 60326 0 60289 0 0 60294 0 60331 0 8 9 1111101 60332 60333 60307 60308 0 0 60310 0 0 0 0 0 0 60314 60316 60318 0 60319 • Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept AFSCME COUNCIL #14 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF AVALON HOMES BML BUILDERS, INC. BROCK WHITE, INC. CENTENNIAL LAKES POLIC CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M EMPIRE ELECTRIC FIRSTAR BANK OF GERBER, RICK ICMA /MANAGEMENT ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCI INTL UNION OF OPER ENG LELS MAC MAY MEDICA NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSU NELSON, KRISTEN PERA /COUNCIL PERA /REGULAR PERA /REGULAR PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK SIGNATURE TITLE COMPAN SMITH, MARK SPRING LAKE PARK, CITY ST. FRANCIS POLICE DEP T.K.D.A. TEAMSTER LOCAL 320 MINNES ASSOCI HOMES PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PARCEL SEARCH SAFE AND SOBER REIMBURSE REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6425 C REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6575 A PARTS /SUPPLIES SAFE AND SOBER REIMBURSE STREET LIGHTS DELTAL INSURANCE REIMBURSE ELECTRICAL PER BOX RENTAL REIMS UTILITY OVERCREDIT PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMB BLDG ESCROW /755 CO MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING 298 SEEDLINGS ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE MEMBERSHIP 2001 TRAPPERS CROSSING 2ND REIMBURSE OVERPAY OF ASS REIMBURSE OVERPAY /DOG LI SAFE AND SOBER REIMBURSE SAFE AND SOBER REIMBURSE FEASIBILITY REPORT PAYROLL WITHHOLDING Total for Dept ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** Amount 543.26 119.20 28.00 2,282.17 475.00 500.00 347.19 1,058.82 12,490.00 1,367.62 80.50 149.00 192.28 3,567.32 3,795.79 348.00 132.00 475.00 6,091.79 264.00 49.00 213.28 13,838.01 13,465.18 298.00 1,045.95 719.81 200.00 18,032.71 27.74 5.00 1,669.20 1,290.52 83,496.71 689.00 169,347.05* Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:34:28 Operator: JAL • Check # Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 60343 WOOD, SANDIE 0 0 0 0 60328 0 0 0 60339 60342 REIMBURSE SUPPLIES /MILEA OTHER Total for Dept 204 BLAINE, CITY OF CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS CIATTI'S RESTAURANT CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC NEIL ENTERPRISES, INC. PRINT CENTRAL ST. JOSEPH'S CHURCH TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN WARGO NATURE CENTER DAY TRIPS SPECIAL STUDENT COUNCIL GIFT WRA SPECIAL GIFT CERTIFICATE SPECIAL STAMPS SPECIAL OFFICE SUPPLIES SPECIAL CRAFT SUPPLIES SPECIAL FLYERS SPECIAL RENTAL FEE SPECIAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL PLAYGROUND /OPTIONS SPECIAL Total for Dept 205 60287 BURGER, LUANN DANCE CLASSES YOUTH IN 60342 WARGO NATURE CENTER PLAYGROUND /OPTIONS YOUTH IN 60343 WOOD, SANDIE REIMBURSE SUPPLIES /MILEA YOUTH IN Total for Dept 207 60292 CROWN TROPHY, INC. TROPHIES 0 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES 60322 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. PHOTO PACKAGES Total for Dept 208 YOUTH SP YOUTH SP YOUTH SP 60286 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. AWARDS /NAME PLATES /ENGRA MAYOR /CO O COUNTRY INN - WHITE B HOLIDAY PARTY MAYOR /CO O REMEMBER ME FLORAL & G FLORAL ARRANGEMENT MAYOR /CO 1 REMEMBER ME FLORAL & G FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS MAYOR /CO O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC OCTOBER 23 MAYOR /CO Total for Dept 401 0 0 0 0 60333 0 0 0 60312 60340 • A T & T WIRELESS ANDERSON, MARILYN D.C.A. INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MEDICA OFFICEMAX, INC. PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SHERBURNE COUNTY GOVER UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR MONTHLY SERVICE CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI DELTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL INSURANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE REGISTRATIOIN /DAN T. LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 402 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING Total for Dept 403 O A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DELTAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ELECTION SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS 15.94 15.94* 91.31 150.00 40.00 66.00 7.08 67.95 142.84 200.00 22.46 180.00 967.64* 486.00 90.00 47.98 623.98* 284.35 24.00 2,945.00 3,253.35* 108.71 500.00 53.78 190.62 735.13 1,588.24* 39.26 1,250.00 237.90 88.40 1,007.53 31.92 34.20 20.00 140.00 71.00 2,920.21* 9.98 9.98* 29.37 13.82 4.00 Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:34:29 Operator: JAL • Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Page: CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Dept Amount 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY SENIORS 4.44 Total for Dept 406 51.63* 60288 C M S HOLDINGS, INC. REGISTRATION /AL R., PAUL O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DELTAL INSURANCE 60333 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 407 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE 0 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC PROJECTOR SCREEN 60333 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVI DELIVERY SERVICE O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY 60323 VILLAGE PROFILE, INC. C C MAP Total for Dept 415 O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DELTAL INSURANCE 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING SERVICE 60333 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O MIDWEST DELIVERY SERVI DELIVERY SERVICE O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60337 SMYSER, JEFF MILEAGE /LUNCH /CONFERENCE 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 416 • 60280 60324 0 0 0 0 0 60291 0 60328 60329 0 60333 60304 0 60334 0 0 • T.K.D.A. MUNICIPAL ENGINEER Total for Dept 417 A T & T A T & T AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR ANOKA COUNTY BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE L CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE CONNEXUS ENERGY CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M MEDICA MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTOR NEIL NELSON & ASSOCIAT PETTY CASH PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN QUEST MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE BATTERY CHECK /CIVIL DEFE MAT RENTAL QUARTERLY BILL MOBILE TE CLASS /M RUMPSA STAMPS CAR WASHES MONTHLY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES UNIFORM SUPPLIES DELTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL INSURANCE CODE BOOKS SEMINAR /M VANA PARKING /MEALS /MILEAGE /SU ADVERTISING PIN REQUEST FINANCE 90.00 FINANCE 44.21 FINANCE 400.00 FINANCE 18.53 FINANCE 12.00 FINANCE 37.33 602.07* ECONOMIC 27.24 ECONOMIC 229.55 ECONOMIC 607.53 ECONOMIC 20.95 ECONOMIC 12.00 ECONOMIC 40.03 ECONOMIC 345.00 1,282.30* PLANNING 110.51 PLANNING 38.13 PLANNING 207.53 PLANNING 17.33 PLANNING 8.00 PLANNING 305.43 PLANNING 26.10 713.03* ENGINEER 46,525.76 46,525.76* POLICE 65.62 POLICE 3.28 POLICE 181.50 POLICE 54.37 POLICE 1,161.45 POLICE 40.00 POLICE 33.00 POLICE 97.98 POLICE 10.65 POLICE 296.48 POLICE 641.80 POLICE 327.94 POLICE 6,754.43 POLICE 610.67 POLICE 175.00 POLICE 280.31 POLICE 261.00 POLICE 3.60 Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:34:29 Operator: JAL • Check # 60321 0 60335 0 60317 0 0 60320 60340 0 0 Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount QUEST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN REMEMBER ME FLORAL & G SHRED -IT, INC. ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVER ST. PAUL CITY OF THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATE UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, IN MONTHLY SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL TUITION COURSE /INVESTIGATORS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UNIFORM SUPPLIES UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY VERIZON WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DELTAL INSURANCE 60333 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 421 POLICE POLICE POLICE MAT POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DELTAL INSURANCE 60333 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60338 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 422 0 0 �5 0 0 0 60333 60303 60305 0 0 0 0 60340 0 A T & T WIRELESS ANOKA COUNTY BOLDT, ROBERT CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M IMC SALT, INC. MEDICA MILLER, CHRIS MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECON PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS T.K.D.A. UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE SIGNAL MAINTENANCE REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW MONTHLY SERVICE DELTAL INSURANCE ROAD SALT MEDICAL INSURANCE REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW UNEMPLOYMENT TAX CONTRACTOR /1999 SEALCOAT LIFE INSURANCE ASPHALT 1999 SEALCOAT LONG TERM DISABILITY MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 430 0 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU 0 APITZ GARAGE, INC. 0 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 0 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 0 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. O DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M PARTS /SUPPLIES REPAIR HEATER CORE/ #342 PARTS PARTS /SUPPLIES TRANSMISSION OIL GASOHOL DELTAL INSURANCE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET 122.51 100.00 111.84 54.95 2,192.00 340.00 350.00 15.98 299.49 417.17 3.14 15,006.16* 35.91 650.00 8.00 19.68 713.59* 44.20 607.53 12.00 1,528.00 36.05 2,227.78* 27.24 626.78 184.96 643.18 88.41 1,977.76 1,215.06 315.00 118.97 3,373.92 22.00 695.34 1,411.06 50.74 2,709.49 13,459.91* 135.87 667.78 177.93 1,653.30 410.90 3,134.87 22.10 Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:34:30 Operator: JAL • Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. PARTS /SUPPLIES 0 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I CLEANER /FLUIDS 60295 GOA COMPANY, INC. TESTING SERVICE 60296 GRAFFCO, INC. HARDWALL HOSE O KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. OIL FILTER O LEEF BROTHER, INC. SHOP TOWELS 60333 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERI REPLACE ANTENNA O PARTS ASSOCIATES, INC. TOUCH -UP PAINT O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60313 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI MONITOR 60315 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, IN SHOP TOOLS 0 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH PARTS /SUPPLIES 0 TRUCK UTILITIES, INC. SWITCH 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY O ZAHL EQUIPMENT COMPANY HOIST REPAIR Total for Dept 431 O A T & T MONTHLY SERVICE O ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE 60290 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF MONTHLY SERVICE O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE 0 DALCO, INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 60293 DALCO, INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES O DIAMOND CLEANING SERVI JANITORIAL SERVICE O GCS SERVICE, INC. REPAIR SENIOR REFRIG 60297 HUGO HEATING AND COOLI IGNITOR /VENTS /LOBE 60302 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, I FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 11103 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA REPAIR O NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT PORTABLES 0 OFFICEMAX, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 QWEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY, DIAP /SLOAN 0 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR REPAIR DOOR 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 432 0 0 0 0 0 60333 0 60306 60309 60341 0 A T & T WIRELESS ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FLANAGAN SALES, INC. MEDICA MENARDS, INC. MRPA NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, QUEST QWEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE DELTAL INSURANCE PLAYERS BENCH MEDICAL INSURANCE LUMBER REGISTRATION /BARRY B., R PARKS ELECTRICAL WIRING /SUNRIS PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS FLEET 770.11 FLEET 95.79 FLEET 36.37 FLEET 21.15 FLEET 10.06 FLEET 6.15 FLEET 400.00 FLEET 290.23 FLEET 121.96 FLEET 4.00 FLEET 291.49 FLEET 33.50 FLEET 91.30 FLEET 58.91 FLEET 37.68 FLEET 319.39 8,790.84* GOVERNME 43.55 GOVERNME 286.25 GOVERNME 1,096.09 GOVERNME 728.21 GOVERNME 27.67 GOVERNME 441.96 GOVERNME 678.86 GOVERNME 171.61 GOVERNME 215.00 GOVERNME 146.44 GOVERNME 400.00 GOVERNME 54.85 GOVERNME 183.70 GOVERNME 70.28 GOVERNME 1,179.20 GOVERNME 4.00 GOVERNME 51.59 GOVERNME 399.05 GOVERNME 8.28 6,186.59* PARKS 88.30 PARKS 136.14 PARKS 15.20 PARKS 132.65 PARKS 1,477.00 PARKS 1,600.00 PARKS 729.79 290.00 1,761.00 58.18 55.22 Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:34:31 Operator: JAL • Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 450 Dept PARKS PARKS 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATI 0 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATI 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DELTAL INSURANCE RECREATI 60333 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE RECREATI 60306 MRPA REGISTRATION /BARRY B., R RECREATI O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE RECREATI 0 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. ADVERTISING RECREATI 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY RECREATI 60343 WOOD, SANDIE REIMBURSE SUPPLIES /MILEA RECREATI Total for Dept 451 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE 60333 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 461 O ASSET RECOVERY CORPORA RECYCLING DAY 0 GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES RECYCLING DAY O J. R.'S APPLIANCE DISP RECYCLING DAY O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES O MERCURY WASTE SOLUTION RECYCLING DAY 0 NASH SALES, INC. RECYCLING DAY O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE I 0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL 6 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 462 60333 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 60340 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY Total for Dept 463 0 60282 60327 0 0 0 0 60297 0 60333 60321 0 A T & T WIRELESS AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPA HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN HUGO HEATING AND COOLI INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, MEDICA QUEST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY MONTHLY SERVICE WATER TROUBLESHOOT AIR COMPRES WATER QUARTERLY UTILITY POSTAG WATER MONTHLY SERVICE WATER DELTAL INSURANCE WATER PARTS /SUPPLIES WATER CHEMICALS WATER REPLACE MOTOR /LUBE /CALIB WATER WATER SAMPLES WATER MEDICAL INSURANCE WATER MONTHLY SERVICE WATER LIFE INSURANCE WATER Amount 22.00 69.98 6,435.46* 120.74 117.35 22.10 207.53 630.00 12.80 78.00 30.77 12.06 1,231.35* 155.60 200.00 1.80 6.82 364.22* 1,068.25 750.00 1,152.00 25.45 133.96 100.00 .40 109.00 491.00 1.52 3,831.58* 200.00 1.80 6.84 208.64* 172.21 383.71 161.65 649.66 19.89 154.34 6,253.71 266.00 63.00 103.77 38.62 7.60 Date: 11/07/2000 Time: 14:34:31 Operator: JAL • Page: 7 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 60340 0 0 0 0 60327 0 0 60333 0 0 60340 0 Description Dept Amount SY /COM, INC. WIRE /CLEANUP /LABOR /REPLA WATER U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, NUT OIL UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY VESSCO, INC. PARTS Total for Dept 494 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, BRW, INC. C. W. HOULE, INC. CIRCLE PINES POST OFF CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MEDICA REPAIR CONDENSER /LIFT ST INFLOW /INFILTRATION CONTRACTOR /WARE ROAD I QUARTERLY UTILITY POSTAG MONTHLY SERVICE M DELTAL INSURANCE MEDICAL INSURANCE RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SY /COM, INC. WIRE /CLEANUP /LABOR /REPLA UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 495 O E: G. RUD & SONS, INC. MARK LOT CORNERS 0 FLANAGAN SALES, INC. PLAYERS BENCH 60330 FOREST LAKE AREA SUPPORT SERVICES 60300 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN TIF 1 -9 LEGAL SERVICES O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING O SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK LAKE DRIVE TRUNK 0 T.K.D.A. LAKE DRIVE Total for Dept 499 2,822.41 WATER 11,475.12 WATER 21.53 WATER 456.06 23,049.28* SEWER 336.75 SEWER 12,912.19 SEWER 1,332.98 SEWER 161.65 SEWER 219.98 SEWER 19.89 SEWER 103.76 SEWER 7.60 SEWER 2,822.42 SEWER 18.99 SEWER 10.51 17,946.72* OTHER 566.00 OTHER 740.00 OTHER 780.00 OTHER 539.50 OTHER 290.70 OTHER 4,251.69 OTHER 33,005.58 40,173.47* Grand Total 367,526.77* Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax November 2, 2000 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12409 — 12425, in the amount of $39,957.94 is hereby requested. • DATE CHECK# NAME 11/02/2000 12409 11/02/2000 12410 11/02/2000 12411 11/02/2000 12412 11/02/2000 12413 11/02/2000 12414 11/02/2000 12415 11/02/2000 12416 11/02/2000 12417 11/02/2000 12418 11/02/2000 12419 11/02/2000 12420 11/02/2000 12421 11/02/2000 12422 11/02/2000 12423 11/02/2000 12424 11/02/2000 12425 • • Centennial Fire District Check Register ANCOM Communications Anoka - Technical College Batteries Plus Best Buy Capitol Communications Centennial Utilities City of Lino Lakes David Bruder Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Image Printing & Graphics Milo Bennett MN Metro Fire Chief Officer's Assn. NFPA International Randy Rolstad Smith Micro Technologies, Inc. Verizon Wireless Grafix Shoppe Page 1 of 1 ACCOUNT AMOUNT 42130 - Equipment Expense 163.01 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 88.00 42130 - Equipment Expense 52.99 42180 - Office Supplies 96.13 42130 - Equipment Expense 247.81 42251 - Station 1 Gas 36.41 41000 - Payroll Expenses 31,978.82 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 62.72 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 1,577.93 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 740.87 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 544.94 42200 - Dues and Memberships 116.00 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 76.95 42130 - Equipment Expense 27.27 42110 - Other Maintenance 1,414.15 42240 - Telephone 183.94 42130 - Equipment Expense 2.550.00 Total $39,957.94 • AGENDA ITEM I Q- • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Milo Bennett, Fire Chief MEETING DATE: November 8, 2000 TOPIC: Donation to Fire District from the VFW Post 6583 Ladies Auxiliary. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority Background: For several years, the Ladies Auxiliary of our local VFW has donated funds for the Centennial Fire District Safety programs. In the past, this money has been used to purchase smoke detectors, purchase supplies for school programs, and fund our annual Safety Camp. This year they have donated $1,000 for these purposes. We are very grateful to the Ladies Auxiliary for all their past and present donations to our programs. This check has been written to the City of Lino Lakes, so that it complies with the Gambling Control Laws. A check in return will need to be written to the Centennial Fire District from the City of Lino Lakes to transfer over these funds. Options: No action is needed, other than to accept the generous donation received from the Ladies Auxiliary to the Centennial Fire District. • • • AGENDA ITEM: 3 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Daniel Tesch, Acting City Administrator DATE: 13 November 20000 TOPIC: Rice Creek Watershed Appointment BACKGROUND State Statute requires the Anoka County Board of Commissioners appoint commissioners to a watershed district nominated jointly or severally by towns and municipalities from within the district. To be eligible for appointment, the nominee must reside within the watershed district boundaries, be eligible to vote in the district, and not be a public officer of the county state or federal government (except that a soil and water conservation supervisor can be appointed). Mr. Andy Cardinal, a Lino Lakes resident, has represented Anoka County since 1972. Mr. Cardinal has been responsive to the needs of Lino Lakes while simultaneously observed sensitivity to the environment. OPTIONS 1. Request Anoka County Reappoint Mr. Andy Cardinal to the Rice Creek Watershed District. 2. Not take action on this item. RECOMMENDATION Number One • • Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00-103 RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF RE- APPOINTMENT OF ANDY CARDNIAL TO THE RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS WHEREAS, Andy Cardinal has served as a Rice Creek Watershed District Manager representing Anoka County since January 18, 1972; and WHEREAS, Cardinal has provided balanced representation during his tenure and currently represents a rural/agricultural background and constituency in an otherwise urbanizing Watershed District; and WHEREAS, Cardinal has been responsive for the needs of Lino Lakes while simultaneously observing environmental sensitivity; and WHEREAS, Cardinal is a resident of Lino Lakes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes supports the reappointment of Andy Cardinal as a Rice Creek Watershed District Manager. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13`h of November, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. COUNTY OF ANOKA Office of County Administration ANOKA GOVERNMENT CENTER COUNTY 2100 3rd Avenue • Anoka, Minnesota 55303 -2489 (763) 323 -5700 October 18, 2000 JOHN "JAY" McLINDEN County Administrator The Honorable John Bergeson Mayor, City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Rice Creek Watershed District Appointment Dear Mayor Bergeson: • In accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. §103B.227, Anoka County in late October 2000 will publish notice of a vacancy for the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. The notice publication requirement applies because Rice Creek Watershed District is considered to be a watershed management organization. The published notice must state that persons interested in being appointed may submit their names to the appointing authority which is the county board for a watershed district appointment. For your information, a copy of the notice which is to be published is attached. • In appointing a manager to the Rice Creek Watershed District, Minn. Stat. §103D.311 is also applicable. This statute requires a county board to appoint managers for a watershed district from a list of persons nominated jointly or severally by the towns and municipalities within the district if a list(s) is submitted 60 days before the manager's term of office expires or to appoint a manager who resides in a city or town that fails to submit a list. If there is a desire to jointly submit a list for the manager appointment, you may wish to confer with affected cities and towns and jointly submit the list. The cities and towns with territory located in the Rice Creek Watershed District are Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbia Heights, Fridley, Lexington, Lino Lakes, Spring Lake Park and Columbus. In order for names submitted to the county to be considered a list under the statutory definition, the list must contain the names of at least three nominees eligible to be appointed. To be eligible for an appointment, a nominee must reside within the watershed district boundaries, be eligible to vote in the district, and not be a public officer of the county, state, or federal government (except that a soil and water conservation supervisor can be appointed). In making watershed appointments, there is an additional factor which is to be considered by a county board. Minn. Stat. §103D.311 requires watershed district managers to be appointed to fairly represent the various hydrologic areas within the watershed district by residence of the manager appointed. FAX: 763 - 323 -5682 Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer T D D/TTY: 763-323-5289 • • • October 18, 2000 Page 2 The appointee whose term will expire on January 17, 2001, is Andrew Cardinal, who resides in the Middle Rice Creek Sub Watershed #12b portion of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Robert Hult resides in the upper sub - watershed, Eugene Peterson resides in the middle sub - watershed and the other managers live in the lower sub - watershed portion of the Rice Creek Watershed District. A map with the location of current board members highlighted is being forwarded to your city's manager /clerk. If you have any questions regarding this appointment process, you may contact Pam McCabe, Assistant County Attorney at 763 - 323 -5667. Sincerely, "r/.r+ s-�i John "Jay" McLinden County Administrator JM /paa Enclosure cc: Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator Pam McCabe, Assistant County Attorney Patsy Anundsen, Administration Office Administrator Rice Creek Watershed Districts Hydrologic Area A/ Highway Af County Boundaries A/ City Boundaries Lake A/ River • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Minn. Stat. §1038.227 and §103D.311 that a vacancy will occur on the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers due to the expiration on January 17, 2001 of the term of Andrew Cardinal, Sr.. Term of appointment is for three years. Managers are eligible to be reappointed. Persons interested in being appointed to serve on the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers may submit their names for consideration to the Anoka County Board of Commissioners, the appointing authority. Minn. Stat. §103D.311 permits the cities and towns in the district to submit a list(s) of nominations to the county board. If a valid list(s) containing at least three eligible nominees is submitted at least 60 days before the term expires, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners is required to make the appointment either from the list(s) or to appoint a manager who resides in a town or city that fails to submit a list. Since a list may be submitted, persons interested in being considered for appointment may wish to contact their city or town to request to be included on a list of nominations. In the absence of a valid list, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners may appoint any voting resident of the Rice Creek Watershed District who is not a public officer of the county, state or federal government. • Assistant County Attorney Jo "J. " McLinden County Administrator PUBLISH IN: Anoka County Union, October 20, 2000 Forest Lake Times, October 19, 2000 Focus Newspapers, October 26, 2000 Quad Community Press, October 24, 2000 cc: Bobbie Koehler • • • • AGENDA ITEM: 38 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Daniel Tesch, Acting City Administrator DATE: 13 November 2000 TOPIC: Cable Television Franchise Extension BACKGROUND The North Metro Telecommunication Commission and AT &T Broadband have been re- negotiating terms for renewal of their cable television franchise. As negotiations continue, it is necessary to extend the life of the current franchise which is due to expire 20 November, 2000. The cities that make up the North Metro Telecommunication Commission are being asked to extend the life of the current franchise to 28 February, 2001. OPTIONS 1. Extend the life of the current franchise agreement to 28 February 20001 2. Deny the extension RECOMMENDATION Number one • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00-106 A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE TERM OF THE CABLE FRANCHISE GRANTED TO MEDIAONE NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS CORP. D/B /A AT &T BROADBAND WHEREAS, the member cities of the North Metro Telecommunications Commission (the "Authority ") granted nonexclusive cable television franchises (the "Franchises ") to MediaOne North Central Communications Corp. d/b /a AT &T Broadband; and WHEREAS, the Franchise was transferred to AT &T Broadband ( "AT &T ") effective June, 2000; and WHEREAS, AT &T has requested a renewal of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, the Authority and AT &T are currently negotiating the terms of a renewal of the franchise pursuant to the informal renewal process set forth in Section 41/ 626(h) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 546(h); and WHEREAS, the Authority desires to extend the term of the Franchise from November 20, 2000, to February 28, 2001, so that negotiations may continue; and that: • WHEREAS, AT &T has consented and agreed to the terms of this extension. NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED by the City of Lino Lakes 1. The term of the Franchise shall be extended from November 20, 2000, until February 28, 2001, unless sooner revoked, cancelled or terminated. 2. All terms and conditions of the Franchise, may be amended from time to time, shall remain in effect during the term of the extension. 3. This extension shall not constitute a waiver of any rights the Authority or MediaOne may have under (i) the Franchise, as it may be amended from time to time; (ii) the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (iii) Chapter 238 of the Minnesota Statutes, Minn. Stat. § 238.01, et seq.; or (iv) any other law or regulation. • • 4. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to give AT &T additional rights or opportunities to trigger the provisions of 47 U.S.C. § 546 (a) —(g), or to require the North Metro Telecommunications Commission to conduct or reconduct hearings or other actions properly taken in conjunction with any renewal proceedings under the current Franchise. 5. No claim that either party may have against the other shall be released or otherwise affected by this extension. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this 13th day of November 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk Accepted by AT &T this day of , 2000: By: Title: • AGENDA ITEM 7 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland P & Z MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: Site & Building Plan Review & Minor Subdivision Mueller -Bies Funeral Home, 7050 Lake Drive VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND This review is based on the following plan submittals: Site Plan- received 9/11/2000 and revised 9/26/200 Landscape plan — received 9/11/2000 and revised 11/3/2000 Grading, utility plan — received 9/11/2000 and revised 10/23/2000 Survey — received 9/11/2000 and revised 11/1/2000 ANALYSIS The submittal complies with the General Business (GB) zoning standards as follows: Required 20,000 sq.ft. Proposed 4.5 acres Lot size minimum Lot width minimum 100 ft. 241.44 ft. Setbacks: buildings From street Rear lot line Side lot line OHW per Shoreland Ord. Parking from street rear lot line side lot line 40' 30' 10' 150' 15' 10' 10' 75' approx. 190' " 130' " + +190' 15' 165' + 10' + on north & 45' + on south Bldg. Height 45' 35' Green space 25% 64% Mueller -Bies Funeral Home October 11, 2000 page 2 • Building The footprint is approximately 13,700 sf. The building will be 35' high. The exterior will be a country theme consisting of face brick, cultured stone, some steel siding and asphalt shingles. A colored rendering is attached for Council information. The trash handling area is located within the attached garage area. • Lighting The submitted lighting plans meets with the requirements of the Ordinance. Light fixtures must be directed downward as provided in the Ordinance and recommended by the Environmental Board. Staff has received detail on the fixtures to be used which meet with the Ordinance requirements. • Signage Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. An illuminated ground sign is proposed for the site but no detail has been provided to date. The Environment Board has requested that no glare be produced from the illuminated sign. • Landscaping The landscaping plan has been reviewed by our Environmental Coordinator and the Environmental Board. The Board recommended additional screening of the front parking lot and use of native species were possible. A revised plan has been submitted and meets the recommendations of the Environmental Coordinator. This plan indicates native plantings and enhanced landscaping along Lake Drive. This landscaping must remain outside of the County right -of -way. • Utilities City utilities are available to serve the site and are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. The engineering reports are attached for Council information. Several engineering items have been revised as recommended in the first report with additional detail outlined in the 11/2/00 report to be addressed by the application prior to construction. • Parkin City Code requires a minimum of 20 spaces per chapel, 1 space per vehicle and 2 spaces per residential unit for a funeral home w /an accessory apartment. The total requirement is 44 parking spaces. The plan shows parking for 109 stalls. The applicant believes this amount of parking is necessary for the use even though our Ordinance requires considerably less. No overflow parking is available in the vicinity and a large funeral may require this amount of parking. Staff would agree that 44 spaces seems inadequate 0 • Mueller -Bies Funeral Home October 11, 2000 page 3 for this use and concur with the request for additional spaces. The applicant has agreed to provide additional landscaping along Lake Drive which will help to screen this parking area from the roadway. • Roads, Access, Circulation Access and circulation patterns appear adequate to serve the site. Anoka County has recommended the proposed driveway location and indicated that it must be shared with the property to the south. A shared driveway agreement will be required for this area. The County has also indicated that an additional 20' feet of right -of -way will be required for the future reconstruction of Lake Drive. The County will prepare the deeds for signature and recording. • Park Dedication Park dedication will be subject to City policy. For commercial use the requirement is $ 200 per 1000 sf of commercial building. Therefore, the park dedication will be approximately $ 2,300. (Based on 11,554 square feet of building) ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on September 27, 2000 and recommended approval of the project. A copy of their comments are attached. One of the Boards concerned related to the OHW level on Rice Lake. For Council information, the proposed construction meets the setback requirement from the OHW according to our Shoreland Ordinance. The DNR has reviewed the plans and expressed no additional concerns with the proposed development. The RCWD tabled the site plan review at their 9 -27 -00 meeting with authorization for administrative action, TWAFAA (this is an approval with conditions). MINOR SUBDIVISION The property in question is a 7.6 acre unplatted parcel of land that is proposed to be split into two parcels. Parcel A, the Mueller -Biel site, will be 4.5 acres in size and Parcel B will be 3.1 acres in size — less right -of -way dedication required by Anoka County. The Zoning Ordinance provides a minimum lot area of 20,000 sq. ft. for the General Business Zoning District with a minimum frontage of 100'. Both proposed parcels exceed the Ordinance requirements. Parcel A is 500' in length and Parcel B is 446.5. Staff would recommend approval of the Minor Subdivision with the dedication of 20' of additional feet of right -of -way to Anoka County for the reconstruction of Lake Drive. A revised survey will be required prior to Council review indicating this land dedication. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this site plan review and minor subdivision at their October 11, 2000 meeting and recommended approval with the following conditions Mueller -Bies Funeral Home October 11, 2000 page 4 on a 5 -1 vote with Rafferty voting nay (Schaps absent). A copy of the P & Z minutes are attached for Council information. CONCLUSION In review of this plan and the revised drawings, staff would recommend approval of the minor subdivision and site plan review with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are obtained and include a 1% escrow deposit to insure completion of site improvements. 2. Landscaping according to the revised landscaping plan submitted 11/3/00. 3. Park Dedication shall be required per the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 4. An additional 20' of right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County by Deed. 5. A revised survey document, indicating the right -of -way dedication, shall be provided prior to Council review. 6. Drainage and Utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and shall provide sanitary sewer service to Parcel B. 7. All lighting shall be directed downward and produce no glare on the roadway. 8. Approval of the site plan is not an implied approval of signage. All signage will require a sign permit and must comply with the City's Sign Ordinance. 9. A shared driveway agreement shall be provided for the entrance drive. 10. Access permits shall be obtained from Anoka County Highway Department prior to construction on the site. 11. The minor subdivision shall be approved as shown on the revised survey document indicating the additional 20' of right -of -way and drainage and utility easements required by RCWD and the City of Lino Lakes. OPTIONS 1. Approve minor subdivision. 2. Approve site plan review with conditions outlined above. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 and 2 1 16 2 _ i5 S3 • J4 r.../ 13 AUD. SUB. 9- 15 134 7 8 9 10 11 12 5TY- AOA N0. I53-- 11111111 a pi ©EMIv la 0-1 Ira Fri ml in um so CJ 2 IN 01 . ' o sco 0 1111 4 I 5 6 2 30 4 LINO LAKES L REHABILITAT10I't CENTER 17 b v 9rAlt 300 1 HWAY 5049 ♦TN- Sf9EET- 1111111111. IP TP T I 3 4 5 6 12 AMLLO omvE C.S.A.H.I I 1OLLOMEAOOWS T AWN HOMES s s TR. CT R.L.S. MARSHAN LAKE • to NORTH R¢ CRIO) RICE LAKE RESHAN • • Memorandum DATE: October 5, 2000 TO: Jeff Smyser, City Planner Mary Kay Wyland, Planning Coordinator FROM: John Powell, City Engineer RE: Site Plan Review Comments Our comments regarding the site plan submittals for the October 11, 2000, Planning and Zoning meeting are as follows: Mueller -Bies Funeral Home 1. The ordinary high water elevation and the ground water elevation must be provided. 2. A detail for the pond outlet must be included in the plans. 3. The size of the watermain that runs parallel to Lake Drive must be increased to 12 -inch and extended to the southwest edge of the site. The funeral home will be served with a 6 -inch branch off of this main. 4. Currently, the basement floor is below the high water elevation of the pond. Either the basement floor elevation needs to be raised or the high water elevation of the pond needs to be lowered. 5. Storm water runoff calculations need to be provided for the 10 -year storm for both the existing and proposed conditions. 6. The proposed pond needs to provide 1 foot of free board above the high water elevation. 7. A gate valve is needed at the connection to the existing watermain. 8. The cover for watermain that is 10 inches or Tess is 8 feet. 9. The minimum storm sewer size is 15 inches. 10. RCWD and ACHD review and/or permits are required. 76° ("Cot C? §Go 2( Intertech Plastic 1. A detail for the construction entrance must be shown as well as the location of the entrance on the grading plan. 2. The 903, 904, and 905 proposed contours near the southwest corner of the proposed building do not tie into the proper existing contours and must be corrected. 3. The utility plans shows two sanitary services connecting into the existing manhole. This is not acceptable. A new manhole must be constructed to facilitate the service for the proposed building as well as a future service for the property to the west. A single 8 -inch main would then be constructed from the proposed manhole to the existing manhole. 4. The invert elevation of the sanitary sewer service at the proposed building must be shown. 5. The need for a fire hydrant on site must be reviewed by the fire department. 6. RCWD and ACHD review and/or permits are required. If you have any questions, please let me know. NOU -06 -2000 15:40 oTKDA 651 292 0083 P.02/03 TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • • MEMORANDUM To: John Powell Copies To: From: Jason Wedel Date: November 3, 2 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLATA 44-4 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE: 651x292 -400 FAX; 651r282-0083 • Reference: Mueller -Bies Funeral Home Lino Lakes, Minnesota Commission No. 11985 -002 I have reviewed the revised plans for Mueller -Bies Funeral Home Bank received on October 23, 2000. I have the following comments: 1. A drainage area map needs to be provided. 2. The Time of Concentration path increases from 531 feet, under existing conditions, to 1029 feet, under the proposed conditions, for subcatchment 1. A sketch of the Time of Concentration paths needs to be provided. 3. The grading plan calls for 15" RCP from the outlet control structure, but the detail provided shows a 12" RCP. The detail needs to be corrected. 4. The outlet detail and the hydrocad calculations show an outlet elevation of 893.0, but the grading plan shows an outlet elevation of 892.0. The grading plan needs to be corrected. 5. The orifice opening for the outlet structure appears to be underground based on the grading plan. Either the grading of the pond needs to be adjusted, or a pipe will need to be extended from the orifice. 6. The outlet control structure detail should be shown on the grading plan, not on a separate sheet of paper. 7. The grading plan shows a bale check detail, but the location of where the bale checks are to be used is not shown. 8. The slope of the storm sewer that crosses beneath the driveway entrance does not correspond with the invert elevations shown. 9. The class of storm sewer pipe must be shown. 10. The cover for watermain that is 10 inches or less is 8 feet. 11. The silt fence detail is not the City detail. 12. The rock construction entrance needs to be dimensioned as 20' minimum width. 13. Relocate the 6 -inch gate valve near the tee. 14. The proposed right -of -way needs to be shown on the plans. An Equal Opportunity Employer NOU -06 -2000 15:41 John Powell November 3, 2000 Page 2 651 292 0083 P.03/03 15. A drainage and utility easement will be needed for the sanitary sewer. 16. The 10 -year peak flow discharge for the proposed condition exceeds the existing condition. 17. Prior to construction a profile of the proposed watermain will need to be provided for review. If you have any questions or comments regarding this review, please contact me. DatG: � ICK FAXf To: --- may\ From: y 0jA_ ? Co. /Dept. Co./Dept. % J Fax: Fax: Phone: 3,2_0 to „ }� tI V 211 Phone: Note: E -Mall: TOTAL P.03 Mary Kay Wyland From: "'Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jeff Smyser Friday, September 29, 2000 9:35 AM Mary Kay Wyland John Powell; Marty Asleson Mueller -Bies MEMORANDUM September 29, 2000 to: Mary Kay Wyland from: Jeff Smyser subject: Mueller -Biel Site Plan Recommendations from Environmental Board The Environmental Board made the following recommendations at its 9/27/00 meeting. This is not the exact wording of the recommendations, which will be in the minutes, but I have the gist of the issues here. 1. Lighting should be directed down on the site. 2. The illuminated sign should not produce glare on the roadway. 3. The OHWL issued should be clarified and properly addressed. . 4. Clarify that there is no wetland impact. 5. Some visual screening should be added to screen the parking lot from the road, if possible, given the stormwater swale along the front of the site and the additional road dedication. 6. Native species should be incorporated into the landscaping where possible. Stormwater design should include infiltration to the greatest extent possible. • 1 3335 West St. Germain P.O. Box 1228 St. Cloud, Minnesota 56302 -1228 (320) 251 -4109 Fax: (320) 251 -4693 Mueller -Bies Funeral Home Lino Lakes, Minnesota The approximate 13,700 square foot funeral home to be constructed in Lino Lakes, Minnesota on Lake Drive (between 7040 and 7080) is to be completed so that Laurie Bies, Jim Nielsen, and the staff of Mueller -Bies Funeral Home of Roseville, Minnesota can provide the families of Lino Lakes and the surrounding areas with quality services and a facility they deserve during their special time of need. The Mueller -Bies Funeral Home was established in 1906 and is a fourth generation family -owned funeral home with both Laurie Bies and Jim Nielsen residing in the area. The exterior of the facility will have a country theme, with a combination of stone, brick, and metal siding with asphalt layered shingles. It will also contain approximately 130 -140 asphaltic parking stalls with curb and gutter per City requirements. The landscape design will be "Prairie Style" with input from Central Landscape Supply and from The Prairie Is My Garden company of Clearwater, Minnesota. The interior will contain a spacious Lobby and two separate Chapels. Each Chapel will have a private Family Room adjoining it. There will be a private Arrangement Room and Casket Selection Room containing approximately 24 caskets. The Preparation Room will be built to meet/exceed all OSHA regulations and specifications. There will be an attached three stall Garage with Living Quarters on the second level and a small Mechanical Room in the basement. The building will be completely sprinklered per City codes. We anticipate construction to begin at your earliest favorable approval of this application (November 1, 2000). Construction is expected to take approximately six to seven months, with completion before June, 2001. Your favorable approval of this project will greatly be appreciated. The Mueller -Bies Funeral Home is excited to become a part of the Lino Lakes community and to provide the families a quality service during their special time of need. • ( RECEIVED SEP 1 1 2000 C+TY OF LINO LAKES Miller FUNERAL HOME DFSIGN & CONSTRUCTION A Division of Miller Architects & Builders • • • 1 vc#!6■• }• M. + • {.....d..,... • • ••• PLANTING SCHEDULE REMARKS BALLED AND BURLAPPED BALLED AND BURLAPPED BALLED AND BURLAPPED BALLED AND BURLAPPED 2 GAL. CONTAINER 2 GAL. CONTAINER I GAL. CONTAINER I GAL. CONTAINER I GAL. CONTAINER I GAL. CONTAINER CI w w in a3d11V0 C h h C t 1 •O = 1 J O I v O I J O I r n d u n ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS COMMON NAME (botanical name) GREEN ASH (Freeman penn'givanica lanceolate)] RED OAK (auereua rubre) e L. u Lz a e a e 3 u a 1 U ac al 01 w a Q a SPRING SNOW CRAB (malua) COMMON PURPLE LILAC ('gang' vulgar!' purpu, JUNE BERRY CLUMP 1) COMPACT CRANBERRY BUSH (viburnum trdob� SEDGE GRASS (wax morrow variegate) COMMON REED SAGO PONDWEED (pomategeton pectrnetue) BROAD —LEAF ARROWHEAD (aegrttaria let r 1.: PRAIRIE HARVEST SEED MIX * x31131 Q 1 1 U a w w s , 7 I-2 Y J r .1.1I1Vf N O ='i in Nr .3 o h 1 1 1 1 1 3dA1 S9flaH8 1 833x11 m3N G NI1NY1d m3N cri el OC z Zco uiw ui O lu 11 0 0J w3 >— Qw ZI- Qtn F. w 0 J m z W S H OJ ZW z zm u', *m NUMBER NOTES w J 0 w U w w u1 W J Z p w 1- Q W W p IA OQ •p aW .<2 �y 111 a WQ O ii W U > -JvWJ�w Q Oc QuW :Q111p w 0 �OL�W1 -Q-J. w 2wwp mo- Y w %zu in U < Wx aW 1~ 7 x mina) w :lai zaQ s a? Qa a.YOYW17pw -n1 wOlyQ zm_p Q 111 wwWa111— ZMILFWMIS 1- ml-I -7 ucWwwOpw1 QUW ODUU =1- U —p11-UOQ 03zzEC0U1- zormpu OCWOOL ° U ZUUJOILUZJZ IZ LOCATE BUILDING AND PARKING FROM THIS CORNER. pro• P e240.0. ARl(/NG Sl? ACK / /� �- APPROXU1ATH EXTENTB Oi• EXIS IN6 WETLANDS / / 1, / EW, TCUO STORY 1Z -945 S.F. FUNERAL Y�rts 3t/ APARTMENT EL, FIRST -FJNISHED t/ PL OR = 100' -0" STORM WATER RETENTION LLOCCAATION WITH CIVVIILL PLANTS Ave lter"- t3:es Fti nerrai Horne. SITE /LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE, r -30-0• lO -O• PARKING SETBACK // 1// 1/ // /1 / APPROXI TE EXTENTS OP EXIB WETLANDS RE CEIVr Nov °; 2000 I C ;TY OF LNG t-/ Kt3 CI SW gal Meer sa 8 �xv °389`.;2 / / / / / / / 1 / / / / / 2 / / / /a/ CONNECT TO EX 12- DIP WATERMAIN / 12- GATE VALVE 1' ma be ei 0 CONNECT TO EX MH C INV 889.00 S -. Olp -5'44V Co2 ie O O fi▪ b -41 *75R Co moo' r ' ; Q7S 141.13 TOP 897.50 INV 892.46 14 INV 892.56 S PLUGGED STMH ORFICE 890.0 INV 893.00 TOP 8946 22LF -15 RCP00.5 (141F +APRON) / / • MLLLER FUNERAL HOME FINAL UTILITY PLAN FOR: MILLER FUNERAL HOME DESIGN + DEVELOPER 3335 WEST ST GERMAIN STREET ST. CLOUD, MN 56302 Telephone: (320) 251 -4109 SYMBOLS - - - GAS - - - - DENOTES GAS LINE — —UT— — DENOTES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE — —0E— DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNE �lNI DENOTES SANITARY SEWER -8- 0 ®TEL Ki • • • DENOTES WATER MAIN DENOTES GAS MARKER DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX DENOTES POWER POLE DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT DENOTES NELL DENOTES CATCH BASIN DENOTES STORM MANHOLE DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE 7 TON PARKING LOT PAVEMENT SECTION 1 -1/2" 2341 WEAR /NC COURSE • 2" 2331 SASE COURSE' 9 TON PARKING LOT PAVEMENT SECTION r1-1/2" " 234 / of IF-- ,%/NC COURSE L2- 2351 5, CE ..,....T CL 5 700,7 CRL'ShEO 5TONE 11- CL 5 7 5O -: SOIL REPORT WILL VERIFY CITY'S 7TON REQUIREMENT INDICATES AREAS FOR ` _ jt 9 TON PARKING LOT SECTION B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 3- RAD 3 RAD. 2- 0" 1/2 RAO. 1 13 /2- CER!ThICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wos prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly Professional Engineer under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Susan E. Fussell Date: Lie No. 25527 DRAWN BY SEF JOB N0:569 -001 DATE: 9/11/00 CHECK BY: . DWG N0:569001UT SHEET: 1 of 1 1 10/23/00 CITY COMMENTS 10/8 SEF NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY • NORTH UTILITY CONTACTS ELECTRIC NSP NSP TELEPHONE. OWE-ST CAB! F: MEDIA ONE PUBLIC UTILITIES CITY OF LINO LAKES TOM DEWOLFE Phone: (651) 982 -2400 Fax: (651) 982 -2499 DEVELOPER MILLER FUNERAL HOME DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION RUSSELL KARASCH Phone: (320) 267 -8423 Fax: (320) 251 -4693 ENGINEER Metro Land Surveying & Engineering Susan Fussell, P.E. Phone: (651) 766 -0112 Fax: (651) 766 -0612 SURVEYOR Metro Land Surveying & Engineering JIM BRAULT Phone: (651) 756 -0112 Fax: (651) 766 -0612 *Utilities mapped from data gathered from the preceeding sources. These are approximate locations only. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL BEFORE DIGGING. Telephone boxes, gas marker, storm pipe Inv.. hydrants and power poles were field located by METRO LAND SURVEY. NOTES: BENCHMARKS: PRIMARY BENCHMARK: IP SW CORNER 896.37 ROW REBAR 896.46 SITE BENCHMARK (ESTABLISHED BY METRO LAND SURVEYING de ENGINEERING, LLC) RECD. OCTr7 GRAPHIC SCALE m 1 toot w 60 ft. METRO IATm SURVCYIId0 .'412 County Road D, Iitt1e Canada, RN 55117 Telephone: (651) 766 -0112 FAX: (651) 766 -0612 Email: eurvey4)metrole.eom • • • NORTH lko 14• PINE P. 14• MAPLE Y ElM Azfais 12• FINE ^ ' la• ELM '.. MLLLER FUNERAL HOME TOP 902.93 INV 888.51 16• ELM 14• ELM 2 EL/ lAilargatiL 4a' 4M 4y EX SAN MH TOP 894.56 INV 887.84 .ORFlQE.'890.0 INV./892.00 1QP 894.6 LF- 15•RCP00.5K /14LF +APRON) GRADING PLAN CURB CUT DECAL O O CL 91 RIP RAP TO BE OOO TO BE PLACE AT AU. CURB CUTS LOCATIONS NOTES PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING, INSTALL SILT FENCE IN LOCATIIONS SHOWN OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE WILL BE REQUIRED WHERE LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE. ROUGH GRADING SHALL PROCEED ON AN AREA BY AREA BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNCOMPLETED AREAS. AS EACH AREA OUTSIDE THE STREET IS GRADED, PROVIDE NATIVE TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCH ANCHORED WITH A STRAIGHT SET DISC WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINE GRADING. MAINTAIN AND REPAIR SILT FENCES (INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT) UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABUSHED. SEED TO BE MnDOT TYPE 500, MULCH TYPE 1 (2 TONS /ACRE). SEED FOR PONDINC AREAS TO BE MnOOT TYPE 156 (WET MEADOW MIX). TOPSOIL TO BE RESPREAD TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES ON THE FRONT AND REAR PORTIONS OF THE LOTS. EXISTING CONTOURS -830 NEW CONTOURS X 886.2 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS X 886.2 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS SILT FENCE CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly Professional Engineer under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Susan E. Fussell Date: Lic. No. 25527 BALE CHECK DETAIL DITCH Bala. Plata 1 -'edge 5047.E tight T.im a eiry__1 l A SEE DETNL --' BELOW RECOMMENDED SPACING BETWEEN DITCH CHECKS DITCH GRADE (X) SPACING (FT.) 2 100 • 75 6 50 6 45 10 25 A NOTE Point A must be higher that Paint B NOTE: Two 2 el • 2 in. wood stakes or reinforcing bars in each bale and embedded n the Round 10 F. min. DESIGN CRITERIA (BALES); Storm frequency. 2 x - 4 hr. Max. Mow velocity. 5 ft.3scc. Max. ditch grads'. 50 Max. drainage area. acres 2"n2'a4' W000 STAKES 04' 0.C. SILT FENCE PROPEX "SILT STOP" FABRIC OR EQUAL- FASTEN TO STAKES 10' MIN. —� BACKFILL —BURY BOTrO FABRIC PROPOSED EMBANKMENT ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NO SCALE OCR c4 3 2.000 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ) 11th- 30 1t. DRAWN 91` SEF .08 N0: 569 -001 DATE: 9/11/00 CHECK 6Y. . DAC 4112 569001G WEED 1 of f 9 -26 -00 WATERSHED 004840415 SET N0 10/11/00 10/23/0( DATE LOWER 44MSWG OTY COMMENTS 10/5/00 DE5cR1•1KN SEP SET Br CITY OF LINO LME'= 1 METRO IAND SURVEYING A ENGINEERING 412 County Road D, Little Canada, MN 55117 Telephone: (651) 788 -0112 FAX (851) 789 -0612 Email: aurreyalmalrola.com • • • 1 6a11:10 EILMULI OUZO EIDL101i' 01:11:70C1 COME] MEM 0=1 DU 1:1D0D0000 LICIELIF. ULKIILI Da:IOU UULIGE1 001:11:1:1 :CDOLIO STORAGE MOM STORAGE 7013Q10 17! [3 ti 0 ICI p EREE BBBH LOME *••• WM, MICE NORTHMAIN LEVEL PLAN urov• 11.55 .‘t LCI.NCE cwi 0000130rJ0 E3 n DE:31.31E3 . 041.0fENS MECHANICAL LOWER LEVEL PLAN NORTH we-a. 121.0 UPPER LEVEL PLAN NORTH IN Cr w w w Miller Ana It 11X:15 ac BLIII_DERS 3335 WWI n. GERMAIN 1..0.10X 1271 HT. CLOUD. MINNYHOTA OPFlak MA12514109 FAX:1320 144711 C TY OF LINO LAKES 1P) NELDERMY1 HO'R FOT COrReEPULgahn1 SIMMONS SHOW 71726 FLOOR PLANS DRAWN RP: DAT& TJ? I 0.02000 MET NO Al • WEST ELEVATION VS'WtT 5'irf, y'mac-''_ ; _ 11111 =rte, X n icii/ /n il r GaaLJa/ I 11 '11:11,- 6 -7 r _ - -- CEDAR MINGLE GAME /LENT 'CAMEL HNC CLAP DOOMS 87 RCVSS fs4' }45`'41 7`' ,_y • • - z aaaa a 'iia, s■ itan—' `'�- -u■ aia a ata. PA/— —MIA Mg 1111. 11 /1 ;1111' — WELT SIENNA' SIWEE ORd,1 RFRNFI FD METAL RCM FDGE 'I WjN TAN PREFRDS:RD SDFRT8 FASCIA SYSTEM 'VOE.SRIN TAM STEEL SWING — TOESION TAY PRQ7NI5. EP META: METE MAW SEALED NA1VRAL CEDAR TAPERED COLUMNS "HONEY' COIN= LIv (STONE CULTURED STONE COLUMN DA5E TAR PALMIST FACE. MICR 'L,L:Osi'.s NORTH ELEVATION VS .W4P rreaCrir�- titre ■ta N attar.: 11hM11, 1111 ~�� in •'i- :4•T.•r•TS4':4... {i2i _4a *� -. EAST ELEVATION VA',4O P • SOUTH ELEVATION MIHer MIL It IHL:1J h1719LI RS 3335 WEST 8F. CREMES F.O. M7R 1739 ST. CLOUD MINNESOTA 91.703 OFFICE Ina) 251-4110 FAX: p30734O4711 iTY OF LINO LAKES • hlw Grog. Cc onallmaden REVISIONS SHRETTTTIJT EVISTIOR ELEVATION^ DRAWN EY: TJP DATE: 9.12000 SHPZT.V0. A2 • icvlq C1'10,071, • s • ...lit .7871,1/22.«,rn't .W.44RIUN 89 FAR.KING STALLS /1 11/ APPROXIMATE t EXTENTS OF EXISTING INET I ANDS / / ILLUMINA SIGN / (...••••• .!L I 20 PARKING STALLS I /1 / / / / / / 1. ll 1 .V$.4 , 1.04#1..100 Pf•ta-1 ' .....7...... i 4-4 } LANDSCAPING PLAN lz-41" PARKING - _ t/1/1 CK / 1,1 APPRO./H MATE EXIEN • /: OF . EXISTING WET LAND'S AREAS TOTAL STTB AIWA l94.1411$(1 VT •ROILING AREA 11.354/10 PT ruLuNG & MAMMA: AREA 44,04 SQ PLANTING SCHEDULE 1 1 i COMMON 1114/TAIMIC AI. NAME 111 ! LURKS A ULM.; COIA.0.411.1PPLE vulgar. p.p..) --ii •I e 5,,,,,... 21 • i , ,...... : • ; P EAGO EVNIYMED Crograwonon peeNna.•) 1 i • , 1-• 1 ,, . I E IIROAD-LEAF AlUCCAJHEAD (5•44...5. bruto114) i . ■ I ! " a r I I i 1 c' I' ' s'b—r--, ASK GEEEN (Pnolnus- Pe- isylborize 1.4.eakto) MARE. EAILOR (Aar Satachoing.) Mat rArex (M.A. worts) ; 1-4ALUD AAP IkirlAret4 - au= Awo vues.wir; 1 4 I J OtAD.511UNG SNLVI . OAPIA•4.1 • e•IY . MUSD MO INOLAITT4 I4,CP • ; SALM AND INAMAPPEO NIKES: L VE/04 411 PLAIIIWO W/ 0.1/014 VV. 10110141,4111.41 MO. Nun., 0111111111111114%.11, ACE 1011L /LANTELW11.1,4011,141114.411.0 1.1.1,11145471145, 1/41111501,4144111t SIMMS; MAL 0R.666.swestni.urruatamexuaortimEE3 lejiAttarg- EMMY Ft ArsGi4G :211MEARV - onto am Dew NaTifiala4Prag I ODETAIL PLANTING kr& CI RECE1V SERI/6400 OiTY OF LINO LA ES LE-q-;-L-a:,_111gliklAtti=,\EV coicoq 1XT caneariuud©Gil 11111111111111111•11111111111111111111 *Mt 1 / & IMLILLIBIS laS MIST STA:EMUS P.O. BOY 12111 Mt. CL1.11.1.410.11.110TA OPPICIC. (354 251.4114 FAT, OPP 104711 EVASIONS SIIEET11172 ,ANOSCAFIN*111.A16 AMAIV71 JIM TJf DAM 9.262000 AO • Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 3 Mr. Corson stated there are houses out there that do not meet the 7/1 requirement. He asked if this is going to continue to be an issue. Staff advised the City assumes that one of the covenants would include a review by the Air Park. Staff stated it is assumed that the Air Park reviewed this issue before the houses were built. Mr. Rafferty asked for clarification regarding the 7/1 requirement of the Air Park. Staff advised the 7/1 requirement is a FAA requirement that applies to certain slopes at different parts of the runway. Mr. Rafferty stated that on the Thomas Street side there are hangers that go up to the houses. He expressed concern regarding the City having ordinances in place and creating variances for the homes there. The City needs to address these issues up front. He stated it may be time to review the current ordinance. Staff advised the City will be reviewing the ordinance next year. He suggested the Board approve the variance with the added condition that the 7 /1- transition air space be verified. Mr. Rafferty inquired about guidelines the City may structures. e in place regarding hanger Mrs. Anderson advised the hanger will be 1/i • 'a = match the house. Mr. Schilling inquired about how often th requirements. Staff advised there is issue. FAA and State Law apply. Board and inform Board members Mr. Schilling stated there is the hanger. He stated it woul regulations. updated regarding FAA e City ordinances that addresses this to have a consultant come before the s issue. wo -story structure that is closer to the airstrip than eficial for the Board to learn more about FAA Mr. Rafferty asked what the City would do if there is a conflict with the 7/1 requirement. Staff advised they will verify the 7 /1- transition air space. If the hanger can go in between the house and runway, staff will not recommend approval. Mr. Rafferty stated the City has guidelines in place that it needs to follow. There are other hardships that at times need to be considered. He stated he wants to make sure the City is doing the right thing with adjusting variances. The City needs to look at hardships when the house is going in. The City can do a better job of addressing these issues ahead of time. Staff advised a lot of the houses were already built before the ordinance was revised. Acting Chair Lane stated she would like information regarding how long the 7/1 requirement has been in effect with the FAA. She stated that she assumes other houses were grandfathered in. Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 4 Staff advised it is a good idea to ask a Lino Air Park representative to come before the Board and address these issues. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the Variance Request contingent upon verification that the existing location of the hanger is outside the FAA 7/1 slope requirements for runways. The motion supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 6 -0. This item will appear on the October 23, 2000, Council meeting agenda. B. Mueller -Beis Funeral Home, 7050 Lake Drive, Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision Staff presented their analysis of the site plan review for the Mueller -Beis Funeral Home, 7050 Lake Drive. Staff advised the Environmental Board reviewed the project on September 27, 2000 and recommended approval of the project. Staff referred to a copy of their comments. One of the Board's concerns related to the OHW level on Rice Lake. For P & Z and Council information, the proposed co' a ctions meets the setback requirement from the OHW according to the City' a ., land Ordinance. The DNR has reviewed the plans and expressed no additional cerns'4: the proposed development. The RCWD tabled the site plan review at thei 0 meeting with authorization for administrative action (this is an approval co ons). Staff advised the property in questio proposed to be split into two parce size and Parcel B will be 3.1 acres Anoka County. re unplatted parcel of land that is the Mueller -Beis site, will be 4.5 acres in ss right -of -way dedication required by The Zoning Ordinance provide imum lot area of 20,000 -sq. ft. for the General Business Zoning District with a imum frontage of 100'. Both proposed parcels exceed the Ordinance requirements. Parcel A is 500' in length and Parcel B is 446.5. Staff recommended approval of the Minor Subdivision with the dedication of 20 additional feet of right -of -way to Anoka County for the reconstruction of Lake Drive. A revised survey will be required prior to Council review indicating this land dedication, not easement dedication as indicated on the current site plan. Staff reviewed recommended conditions of approval of the minor subdivision and site plan review. Staff noted the applicant would like this item to appear on the October 23, 2000, regular Council agenda. Staff advised the City will not have time to review the revised plans. Therefore, the Council will review this item at the November 13, 2000, regular Council meeting. Acting Chair Lane stated Parcel A is the site for the funeral home. She asked what Parcel B will be used for. Staff advised the use for that site is unknown at this time. Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 5 Mr. Rafferty asked for clarification regarding the location of the parcels. Staff referred to a map indicating each parcel. Mr. Rafferty asked how the development works with the current Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Comprehensive Plan. Staff advised the area is currently guided for commercial but is zoned general business. There are some places in the City that the current Comprehensive Plan does not match up with the zoning map. Those areas need to be reviewed and cleared up. Mr. Rafferty stated the plan is a good plan. He expressed concern regarding the City making errors in spot development. There are townhomes, the Air Park, and a lot of residential in this area. He stated he is uncomfortable with the location of the building. He noted the area north of Elm is all commercial. Mr. Johnson stated the site backs up to Outlot B that is part of the Sea Plane. He asked what effect this development may have on the development of the outlot. Staff advised the outlot contains drainage and utility easements. Mr. Johnson clarified that a portion of Outlot B is happen to the remainder if it is ever developed. down that area. The property cannot be devel south. He asked what will d part of the runway goes The City Engineer added he also believes not be developed. Mr. Johnson asked if the 7/1 stand fairly tall. The City Engineer advised is not adjacent to this building. 's a in this case. He noted the building is ommonly used for take off and landing. The land Mr. Schilling asked if someone will be living in the building on the second floor. Mr. Craig Miller, representative for Muller -Beis Funeral Home, came forward and stated in the course of this type of business, it is common to have an apprentice that lives on site. The apartment will be utilized for a person in training. Mr. Corson stated the primary concern is health and safety of the runway. He asked if the building will be on the side of the taxiway going uphill. Mr. Miller advised the owners are comfortable with the location. An extensive land search was done. He asked how much time is needed for the City to review a shared driveway agreement. The City Engineer advised conditions of approval include revisions of several plans. The report would have to be completed by next Wednesday to appear on the October 23, 2000 Council agenda. There is not enough time to review all the revisions. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 11, 2000 Page 6 Mr. Miller stated the owners are trying to get ahead of the winter weather that may delay construction. Acting Chair Lane advised this item will not go before Council until the November 13, 2000, meeting. Mr. Zych asked for clarification regarding the approval of the RCWD and the conditions of approval. The City Engineer explained the process used by the RCWD when approving a request with authorization for administrative action. Staff advised this practice is commonly used by the RCWD. The City Planner requested the following phrase be added to condition #6: and to provide sanitary sewer service to Parcel B. Staff advised the phrase will make it clear that sewer service will be provided for that parcel also. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve minor subdivision and site plan review, based on the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are obtained and i completion of site improvements. 2. The revised landscaping plan shall inc and is subject to review and approve by and obtain the approval of the Ci Council review. 3. Park Dedication shall be re 4. An additional 20 feet of ri Deed, prior to issuanc 5. A revised survey do 1% escrow deposit to insure ditional screening along Lake Drive staff. This plan shall be submitted ental Specialists prior to City City's Subdivision Ordinance. shall be dedicated to Anoka County by ding Permits. cating the right -of -way dedication, shall be provided prior to Coun ` ew. 6. Engineering: plans shall b revised as indicated in the Engineer's report dated October 5, 2000 and to provide sanitary sewer service to Parcel B. 7. All lighting shall be directed downward and produce no glare on the roadway. 8. Approval of the site plan is not an implied approval of signage. An signs require a sign permit and must comply with the City's Sign Ordinance. 9. A shared driveway agreement shall be provided for the entrance drive. 10. Access permits shall be obtained from Anoka County Highway Department prior to construction on the site. A revised plan with a shared driveway will be submitted along with a shared driveway agreement. The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 5 -1 with Mr. Rafferty voting no. C. North American Composites Co., (Inter - Plastic) 300 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review & Minor Subdivision Staff advised the application includes a minor subdivision and a site and building plan review. North American Composites Company proposes to construct a new distribution • • • AGENDA ITEM 7 B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: Minor Subdivision Site & Building Plan Review North American Composites Company VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The application includes a minor subdivision and a site and building plan review. North American Composites Company proposes to construct a new distribution facility on the site. The company will also conduct repackaging of the product into different size containers on site as well as distribution. The product is polyester resins, fiberglass, and related products. This review is based on the following plan submittals: Preliminary Site Plan 9/11/00 rec'd Preliminary Site Paving Plan 9/11/00 rec'd Revised Landscaping Plan 11 /1 /00 rec'd Drainage Calculations and info 9/11/00 rec'd Exterior Elevations 9/11/00 rec'd Revised South & West Elevations Building Floor Plan/North Building Elevation Revised Sketch & Description (Survey) ANALYSIS Revised Grading Plan Revised Utility Plan TIF application letter Preliminary Site Lighting Plan With Amended Cut Sheets 11/2/00 rec'd 9/11/00 rec'd 11 /1 /00 rec'd 11 /1 /00 rec'd 11 /1 /00 rec'd 9/11/00 rec'd 9/19/00 rec'd 11/2/00 rec'd The site is in the LI Light Industrial zoning district. The submittal complies with the LI zoning standards as follows: Required Proposed Lot size minimum 1 acre 2.39 acres Lot width minimum l00 ft 340 ft Setbacks: buildings from street rear lot line side lot line parking from street rear lot line side lot line 50 ft 30 ft 10 ft 15 ft 5 ft 5 ft 50 39 30 15+ 40+ 30 Bldg. height 45 ft 26 Green space 10% 45% • • • North American Composties November 13, 2000 page 2 • Building The building footprint is approximately 24,980 sf. The warehouse portion will cover about 20,120 sf and office portion will cover about 4860 sf. The warehouse portion will be 26' 4" high. The office portion will be 16' 4" high. The exterior walls of the warehouse portion of the building will be precast concrete panels. The office portion exterior will be decorative concrete block, either smooth burnished concrete block or rock -faced block. The roof will be standing seam metal on both portions of the building. The building materials as submitted by the applicant are included in staff's recommended conditions of approval. The P &Z requested the applicant to revisit the building elevation along the freeway. Because this is a very visible location, the Board asked for some additional attention to aesthetics. The applicant submitted a revised south elevation that includes a custom "cattail" pattern in the concrete panels. The office entry and loading docks are on the east side of the building. An automatic gate will separate the front parking area from the loading area. A six -foot chain link fence will surround the rear parking and loading area. The trash area will be screened with masonry to match the office exterior. • Lighting Cut -sheet pictures of proposed light fixtures show shoebox or hooded fixtures. The original submittal included one unacceptable fixture that was not completely hooded. That fixture was replaced and all fixtures are now acceptable. The lighting photometric plan indicates that lighting will meet City maximum of 1 foot candle at the center line of a public street. • Signage Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. • Landscaping The subinitted landscaping plan is extensive and includes numerous native plants. The applicant submitted a revised plan to respond to the City Environmental Specialist's direction. The Environmental Specialist has approved the revised plan, and recommends that the applicant submit a copy of a maintenance agreement for the native plantings. • • • North American Composties November 13, 2000 page 3 • Utilities The City Engineer reviewed revised plans. The attached memo indicates that some revisions will be necessary. We will require that the issues are addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer before site grading begins or a building permit is issued. • Parking The project includes warehousing and office space. Parking requirements must be calculated separately then totaled. For the office space, our code requires three spaces plus one space per 200 sf. For warehouse, the requirement is one space per 2000 sf plus one space for each company -owned truck. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the gross building area. However, when the applicant's architect supplies the actual floor area, we have used that area as a more accurate indication of actual usage. This can reduce the number of required parking stalls and reduce impervious surface area. The total requirement is 29 parking spaces plus one space for each company -owned truck. The plan shows 27 spaces and three truck parking spaces. There is enough area in the southeast corner of the parking lot for several more parking spaces. The additional spaces just need to be striped. • Roads, Access, Circulation The site will gain access to Apollo Drive via a shared driveway on the east edge of the site. The driveway will be shared with Contract Hardware. The driveway was reviewed as part of the Contract Hardware review. It complies with the joint powers agreement with Anoka County that covers the number and type of accesses on Apollo Drive. Parking will be available for 18 vehicles in the front of the site. The remaining parking stalls are in the rear of the site, through a set of automatic gates. Trucks will enter the site from Apollo Drive, and drive through the gates to the loading docks. There are three loading docks and a drive -in door. • Park Dedication Park dedication will be subject to the City policy. The requirement is $133 per 1000 sf of commercial building. The footprint is 24,980 sf. Therefore, the park dedication would be $3322. actual floor area code requirement required spaces office 3,000 3 spaces plus 1/200 sf 3 + 15 =18 warehouse 22,000 1/2000 sf 11 TOTAL 29 The total requirement is 29 parking spaces plus one space for each company -owned truck. The plan shows 27 spaces and three truck parking spaces. There is enough area in the southeast corner of the parking lot for several more parking spaces. The additional spaces just need to be striped. • Roads, Access, Circulation The site will gain access to Apollo Drive via a shared driveway on the east edge of the site. The driveway will be shared with Contract Hardware. The driveway was reviewed as part of the Contract Hardware review. It complies with the joint powers agreement with Anoka County that covers the number and type of accesses on Apollo Drive. Parking will be available for 18 vehicles in the front of the site. The remaining parking stalls are in the rear of the site, through a set of automatic gates. Trucks will enter the site from Apollo Drive, and drive through the gates to the loading docks. There are three loading docks and a drive -in door. • Park Dedication Park dedication will be subject to the City policy. The requirement is $133 per 1000 sf of commercial building. The footprint is 24,980 sf. Therefore, the park dedication would be $3322. North American Composties November 13, 2000 page 4 MINOR SUBDIVISION The minor subdivision will split an existing parcel into two, shown on the survey (sketch and description) as Parcels D and E. As noted above, the lot to be developed is 2.4 acres, which exceeds the minimum. The remaining parcel will be 5 acres. Several easements will be recorded with the subdivision for utilities and a shared access. These are shown on the survey. The proposed minor subdivision complies with City requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on September 27. Recommendations included attention to infiltration in stormwater design, use of native species in the landscaping plan, assurance that lighting will be directed downward, and attention to soil compaction when possible. Infiltration will be designed in to the extent possible. Native seeds are included. Lighting will be directed downward. The issues will be addressed with a revised landscaping plan to be reviewed by the Environmental Specialist. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ACTION The P & Z reviewed the project on October 11. The Board recommended approval with the conditions listed below. As noted above, the Board requested that the applicant direct additional attention to the building elevation facing the freeway. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Approval of the site plan should include the following conditions: 1. The minor subdivision shall be as shown on the submitted survey (Sketch and Description received 11 /1 /00), including easements as required by the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer. 2. Lighting fixtures shall be those listed on the lighting plan dated 9/11/00 and received by the City 11/19/00 except that the Lumark Nite -Watch fixture shall be deleted and replaced with the Kim Lighting Site Wallform fixture. 3. Twenty -nine parking spaces shall be striped. 4. The precast concrete panels will be Fabcon Wide Rack 3/8" grooves at 3" O.C. with smooth concrete cattail design, or similar design. Decorative concrete block on the office portion of the building shall be either smooth burnished concrete block or rock - face block. • North American Composties November 13, 2000 page 5 5. The applicant shall submit a management plan for the native plantings at the direction of the City Environmental Specialist. This management plan shall be submitted within six months. 6. The issues listed in the November 7, 2000 TKDA memo must be addressed to the City Engineer's satisfaction before site grading begins or a building permit is issued. 7. Final utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. 8. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 9. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. 10. Site plan approval does not imply approval of signage. Any signage shall conform to the sign ordinance and proper permits obtained. 11. Park dedication applies per the City ordinance. OPTIONS 1. Approve the minor subdivision. 2. Approve the site plan with the conditions listed above. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Options 1 and 2 •TKDA • • TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140 PHONE: 651/292-4400 FAX: 651 /292 -0083 To: John Powell Reference: Interplastic Copies To: From: Jason Wedel Date: November 7, 20 Lino Lakes, Minnesota Commission No. 11985 -002 I have reviewed the revised plans for Interplastic received by the City on November 1, 2000. I have the following comments: 1. The 903 and 904 proposed contours along the south side of the proposed building do not tie into the proper existing contours and must be corrected. 2. The invert elevation of the sanitary sewer service at the proposed building must be shown. 3. The need for a fire hydrant on site must be reviewed by the fire marshall. 4. The length of the 6 -inch PVC sanitary sewer service must be noted on the utility plan. 5. The length and grade of the sanitary sewer service stub to the west must be noted on the utility plan to ensure that there is 1.5 feet of separation between the sanitary sewer stub and the 10 -inch water service. 6. The utility plan must include the City standard detail for the drop connection to the existing sanitary manhole. 7. The utility plan must include the City standard detail for the proposed sanitary manhole. 8. The utility plan must include the City standard details for gate valve installation and reaction blocking of the watermain 9. All watermain fittings must be noted on the utility plan. 10. The construction entrance must note that the width is a minimum of 20 feet. 11. There is a note on the Bale Check Detail that refers to a detail below, however, there is no detail below. 12. A legend must be provided on both the grading plan and the utility plan. If you have any questions or comments regarding this review, please contact me. An Equal Opportunity Employer Pi riril . PIMP. 1 1� °�SAN - 69UNFY -NW M-A /6N r • Ivy �1 .T IIfiffhIIIIIII'JI �,0 : ; OUTLOT @ 0��1=�0 LINO PARK ■ I NORTH ° ! i N I! :4:0,__11111111111- g£NM 51 ' 1n:n Ir �� M' $ amor . L €NTURYu �� i3 2 RY`al. 1l12yO•RY9 EN ND �! $ NrU ! O F RM FARM ° ,. ��0 ° IY SI- �� dm_O ®ADD �' �� ��; 0 ibt� :$Eli `� iadAts ,4A RM.; ©60o O�Y ®O Ong m0 0 z dill MIN IIMI 3 3 OF WAM PL-AP N6W6ER -¢5 ° / 4 4 5 5 6 5 6 6 ME■ LINO LAKES 7 REHABILITATION CENTER Cj 2 4 3 6 4 5 5 6! 0 0 0 THE 230504 Y 1ST. J03111 20 I! IS IT uwerao .QTR mho -woo o no o © p: AE IE IIIUIE r_ i !!11111 A vELOo �1 ©,m�a 1E1 DIM his le= El MEN EN ICE Fa CIMMAY011 TEAL COURT 4f�;yll 17 .. n._ • 20. SKETCH AND DESCRIP11ON FOR: INTERPLASTIC MINOR SUBDIVISION AT APOLLO BUSINESS PARK OF: FORMERLY DESCRIBED PARCEL C 11 1 WI2 roll r 0 0) ZI nl ID1 1 1 11 II r POND 74TH 2277.92 N W22'57'. E \ STREET' /l0 7035!` 3\ MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 14 2137 20 385'22.57-W -9072 \ ARCEI, ;.p0T7.27,i* t` 1p� S 6s / 9- p9 ,y \.bpckh 2>'\ vs 511 yh 1 I\/,o^ / I `_r- 1 / `' 3/ .007 01: = / / I ✓ray /' i Ism �_ / I / ' S /tip lop / 2 .- kl / 8/ / I L1'.5'.21,_ La 3 / � _ 0 / 1hyf / I I I 6t ' /77�� \ i'-� / ° �/h900t 1 +''' 8s 1 sot il D /0.1• \ 5 / / / a : ej9 j T / hh4) D ; t b' SO{- 1i' j60 t- �� %SA ? °i 7'4, > � / /+t g/ /\. 6g94 A9, slit/ • c05 56 5 14 01• Z r5� hs • / // -,it I / /1 I - De29 661,0% 11".------ • I 1 _ i 9� / 1 i gp1 ,0 a E 3°0429 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN (-CET 1 1 inch " 100 ft d - •mi u®sir iUiit 'AND SURVEYING '& ENGINEERING t2 East County Road 0. Little C.0040. MN 55117 Telephone (651)766-0112 For (651)766 -0612 E -mail surveyOmetrols.com METRO e 5 • DENOTES IRON. MONUMENT FOUND (UNLESS OTNERSNSE MARKED) l hereby certify ,hot th.s purvey. plan M report was prepared by me a under my direct superriSion 0nd that I am a deify Licensed. Lond Surveyor under the lows of the Slate of M.nnesOto. Ronold P Afwin Date. 5 .tense Na /7765 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING PARCEL "C That port Of the Southeast Ouatr of Section 18, Township 35, Range 22. Anoka County, Mines :.to, lying southe0Sterly of the City of Lino Lokes Right -ol -Woy Plot No 5. Apollo Drive. occordng t0 the recorded 0100 thereof ond lying nOrthweSterly of Interstate No. 35W and lying southwesterly of Die following described line: Commencing 00 the most easterly corner of Parcel 14. City of Lino Lokes Right -of-Woy Piol Na 1. Apollo Drive. Anoka County. MinneSoto occordnq to the recce dad plot thereof; (hence on an assumed bearing of South 68 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds West along the southeasterly line of said dot 6007 feet: thence southwesterly 24399 feet 050n9 sad southeasterly line being a tangential curve concave to the seutneosl. n3Vin9 a radius o5 610 feet and o centre. ongle of 22 degrees 55 minutes 02 seconds; thence South 45 degrees 17 mnutes 18 Wes tongent to spi5 curve 316 66 feet. thence southweste,A 239 02 feet along a tongentid curve concave to the northwest •saving a radius of 899.00 feet and centre' engle of 15 degrees 54 minutes to the point of beginning Of the line to be descrbed; thence South 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds Fest 281 84 feet to the northwesterly right of woy Ine of Inlerslate No 35W end there terrninohnq. DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPOSFD PART:f•I S NORTH RECEIVED Nov 0 1 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES PARCEL 0 That port of the Southeast Coorter of Section 58. Township 31. Range 22. Anoka County. Minnesota, described as commencing 0t the most easterly carer of Parcel l4, City of Lino lakes Right-of -Noy Plot No. 5. Apo.O Drive. Anoka County, Minnesota according to the recorded plot thereof: thence on an 0s 06 batwing of South 68 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds West along the southeasterly line of id plot 60.07 feet; thence southwesterly 243.99 feel olan9s.aid .0 southeast.ly line being ton9enlid curve concave to the southeost. novinq a radius of 610 feet and a centrist ongle of 22 degrees 55 minutes 02 se e ones( thence South 45 degrees 17 minutes 18 West tangent to said cur 316.66 feet; thence southwslerly 239.02 feet along a 1an9entio1 curve concave to the northwest having o rod;us of 599.00 feel and o central ongle of 15 degrees 14 minutes to the point of beginning of the land to be descrbed: said ;mint hereinafter 10 be known os Point •A; thence continuing southwesterly 157.95 feet along the extension of the east descrbed c rve: thence South 70 degrees 35 minutes 58 seconds West. tangent to lest described curve, 177,32 feet; thence South 19 degrees 24 minutes 42 seconds Eost 298.35 feet to the northwesterly right of may line of Interstate No. 350: thence northeasterly o5on9 said northwesterly right of may line to its intersection with a line beoring South 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds East ham the Point of beginning; thence North 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds West 281.84 feet to the point of beginning. (104.423 soft. • 240 Ocres) Tug. the ^I(55th 30 05 meat for drainage and 054.15 purposes over. under 005 across the north 50 fat of the south 80 feet of Inc cost 55 feet. the south 30 a ( the wrest 5 feet and the cost 5 feet of the above descrbed parcel. PARCEL D -1 PONT ACCESS EASEMENT) An easement far ingress err egress purposes aver and across port of the following described parcel: That port of the Sottheost Cowles of Section 18, Township 31. Range 22. Snot. County. Minnesota, descrbed as commencing of the m051 00010.5500(5(1' of Poroe 14. City of Lino Lokes Right-of -Woy plot No 1. 600550 Drive. Anoka County, Minnesota according to the recorded dal hereof, thence on an assumed bean of South 68 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds 001 Wong the southeasterly line of sold plot 60.07 feet: thence southeesteny 243.99 Net clang soef southeasterly line being o lon9ent;ol curve canto. to the southe0st. having o radius of 610 feat and central angle of 22 defies 55 minutes 02 seconds; thence South 45 degrees 17 minutes 18 West tongent to said cu 316.66 feet; thence southwesterly 239.02 feet long 0 lon9entio1 curve concave to Inc northwest hovng o radius of 89900 feet and o central angle of curve degrees 14 minutes to the point of beginning of Inc fond to be described: cso;d pons unofler to be k as Pont -A'; lnenae conl.n0509 s0utnwesterfy 15795 feel along the extension of the fast described e ; hence South 70 eegees 35 emnutes 18 seconds West, tangent 00 5051 described c 177 32 feel; tholes South 19 degrees 24 minutes •2 seconds uE East 298 31 Net to line northwesterly right of way line I Interstate No 350; thence northeasterly along said northeasterly right of way line to its intersection with a e b0060g South 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds East non the point of beginning; thence North 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds West 281 84 leetl {o 1nor Danl of beginning. Said easement is further descrbed as beginning at the previously deserted Point -A -: thence South 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds Eosl prong the Last fine of ltd above descrbed parcel 6000 feet. thence wstrIy al a right ongle to the lost descrbed line 20.00 feet thence northerly par,!, with said Eosl line to the North Fine of the above described parcel: thence dolled oIon said North Inc f y 9 e to the poet a beginning. PARCEL 0 -2 (SANITARY SE1YER EASEMENT) An easement for SOnilay sewer purposes over under. and across the North 50.00 fee( of the West 80.00 feet of the fallowing described oorce5: Tnot port of the Southeast Waster 01 Section 58. Township 31. Range 22. Anoka County. Minnesota. described as commencing et the most easterly corner of Patel 14, City of Lino Lakes Right -ol -Woy Plot No 1. Apollo Drive. AnOkO County Mnnesoto 0cewdng to the recorded 0101 thereof: thence on on assumed Dewing of South 68 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds West Wing Inc southeasterly line of sad plot 60.07 feet. thence outhwesterly 243.99 feel long °said swlneasIMy line being o tangential curve canto. to the southeast. n sing a rod;us of 610 feel and a central angle of 22 degrees 55 minutes 02 se c onds; thence South 45 degrees 17 minutes 58 West tongent to sob r. 35666 fee(; menu southwesterly 239.02 feet along a tangential curve conceive to the northwest nanng o radius of 899.00 feel and o centra angle of 15 degrees 14 minutes to the point of beginning of the land to be described; soil point n inalter to be known as Pont -A-, Inence continuing soutnwsterly 55795 feel along Ine stensi0n of the last descrbed curve; thence South 70 degrees x35 minutes 18 olds West, tongent to lost deserted cur 177 32 feet. thence South 19 degrees 24 minutes 42 seconds rEast 298.3, feet to the nortnwestwls right of way line of Interstate No 350; (hence nalheoslerly done soil northwesterly right of way line to its Intersection with o line bearing South 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds East from the point of beginning, thence North 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds West 285.84 feet to the point of be9nnin9. PARCEL D -3 (PON0190 AND FLOWAGE EASEMENT) An easement for pondng and flowage purposes over and across the north 50 feel of the south 80 feel of the east 55 feet. 0n0.41 lin the south 30 feet of e or pcel described os 1011pws: That part of the Southeast 00orter of Section 18, Township 31, Range 22. Anoka County. Mnnesato, descrbed os commencing OI the mast .0.1.,:5 corner Parcel 14. City of Lino Lokes Ri9nt -al -Way P5oI No 5. Apollo Osl.. Anoka County ° Minnesota according t0 the recorded plot thereof; thence On On a med f bearing of South 68 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds West 0009 the sartheesterly line of sari plot 60.07 feet: thence southwesterly 24399 Net along said southeasterly tin being a tonge0tio5 cur o Inc southeast. n vnq a rod;us of 610 feet and a enlrol 0ngte of 22 degrees 55 minutes 02 seconds: thence South 45 degrees 17 minutes 15 West tangent to sop curve 316.66 feet; thence southwesterly 239.02 feet o ong o tangent:, c . t c Inc northwest hovng a rodius of 899 00 feel and o central angle of r15 degrees 14 minutes to the point of beginning of the farad 1a be descrbed. csaid pont to be known as Pont -A' thence co "Inung southwesterly 157.95 lee( ,ong the extension of the lost descrbed Nora thence 5outn 70 degrees 35 mnutes 18 seconds West. tongent to lost described curve. 177.37 reel; thence South 19 degrees 24 minutes 42 seconds Eost 298.35 5.05 to the nerthwestedy right of way tine of Interstate No 35W: thence northeasterly done; Soid northwesterly right of way line to its intersection with o e Deor..9 South 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence North 29 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds West 281.84 lest to the point of beginning. PARCEL E Tnol part of the Southeast 0rarter al Section 18. Townsn;o 31, Ronge 22. Anoka County. Minnesota, ling southeasterly of the City of L+.o Lokes Right-of-Woy Plot No. 5, Apollo Drive. occwding to Me recorded 0501 thereof and lying northwesterly of Interstate No. 35W and lying southwesterly of the I050on9 Jescr*ed hise Commencing at the most easterly corner o1 0oreel 14, City of Lino Lokes Right -of -Way Plot No. 1, Apollo Drive. Anoko County, Minnesota according to the recorded 0101 thereof; (hence On on 05541hed hewing 01 South 68 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds West Bong the southeoslerIy line of so141 plot 60.07 feet. thence southwesterly 243.99 Net ,ong sofa soutneosteny line Deng a l009enbol curve concave to lne southeast. loving o radius of 6,0 feel one a central angle of 22 degrees 55 minutes 02 seconds: thence Sovtn •5 degrees 17 minutes 18 West tongent to add c 0 r 316.66 feet; thence southwesterly 396 97 feel ,ong o longen(id curve con concave to Inc the nor rod,. v.ng a rod of 899.00 feel ono a central ongle of degrees 16 minutes; thence South 10 degrees 35 mnutes 18 seconds west 177 32 feet, to the Pont of beginning of the line to be descrbed; thence South 19 degrees 24 minutes 42 seconds Eost 298.31 feet to the northwesterly 'lost of woy line of Interstate No. 35W and soil line Mere terminoing. APOLLO DRIVE 51'— 0 15' -0" PARKING FRONT YARD SETBACK 50' -0" BUILDING FRONT YARD SETBACK 78' 10g" FND. RLS PT. 9808 Proposed Site for North American Composites Hazardous Materials Storage Facility R30' —O" s' /' 1 •/', ,1.1 TYPICAL CONC. PAD 5-4" x 4' -0" 21.33 SF RANCE ALK. 67 SF' • •• • • PAVEb• YARD '13 31 068 TRAS ENCLOAU ee 2/ LOCATION of 40' -0" wide x 60' -0" long SHARED —USE SITE ACCESS ROAD CENTERED on P /L. Project Nort Apollo Business Park Scale : 1" = 400' —O" S CHEDULE of DRAWINGS 01.1 Preliminary Site Plan 01.2 Preliminary Site Paving Plan a2.1 Building Floor Plan; Primary Elevation a3.1 Exterior Elevations c1.1 Preliminory Site Grading Pion c1.2 Preliminary Site Utilities Plan L1.1 Landscaping Plan R30' -0" - -- Certificate of Site Survey Drawing � I a I SIDE YARD SETBACK 5-0" PARKING > 30' -0" SIDE TARD SETBACK (as required by UBC 503.4.5.2) PROPOSED 1.5 STORY STORAGE /OFFICE BUILDING 24,982 SF (Fin. Fir. EL: 907.15') • 16' wide , - STALL. for r.l'PARTING ' . CO. -0 El) .,y< AUTOMATI • • ENII�TR ILERS GATES . // • 1,9 10111110W01141.21 5-0" PARKING SIDE YARD SETBACK 30' -0" BUILDING SETBACK • 27. . ; ()RIVE —IN . (5H DOOR' BUF s — '1 31 x TINhigh —LI FENCE LAM Preliminary Site Plan P/L FILTRATION REA. SEE ADING PLAN RECEIVED SEP 1 1 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES Scale : 1" = 20' -0" Project North REQUIRED PARKING OFFICE AREA 3,000 SF — 10% = 2,700 SF 3 STALLS + (2,700 SF x 1 STALL /200 SF) = 13.5 STALLS 17 STALLS WAREHOUSING AREA 22,000 SF — 107. = 19,800 SF 19,800 SF x 1 STALL /2,000 SF = 10 STALLS TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 27 STALLS (25) 9'x18' PARKING STALLS (2) 9'08' ACCESSIBLE STALLS (27) PARKING STALLS S I T E C O V E R A G E Property Area = 104,253 SF (2.393 Acres) 104,253 SF x .60 (609.' Impervious) = 62,518 SF Impervious Surfaces Allowed Building Parking /Service Yard Patio /Walks TOTAL HARD SURFACES 24,982 SF 31,068 SF 1 100 SF 57,150 SF (54.48 %) RECYCLING AREA Recycling Sooce Required Office 3,000 SF x .0025 = 7.5 SF Warehouse 22,000 SF x .001 = 22.0 SF Recycling Area = 30 SF Site Data North David J. Kelly Architect, Inc. Suite 20! SICS Vest ]ON St IWMaww. Mows.. 9324 t9f21 ,22.7311 Consultants Certification OechAstl la* K ~ Yam V. ft41r al Mn+ " n.1. David bsrph Kelly Reg. No. : 15254 Comm. No. :00.031 Drawn By : Kelly Date Issued :09.11.2000 Revisions • Project A New Distribution Office /Warehouse for North American Composites, Co. Apollo Business Center Apollo Drive Lino Lakes, Mn Drawing Title Preliminory Site Plan Scale As Noted Sheet Number far Site Plan R=A.. Only doted 09.11.2000 Not for Canetruati.n a1.1 • PRE - FINISHED STANDING -SEAM METAL ROOFING INSULATED ALUM /GLASS WINDOW UNITS MASONRY WALLS of OFFICE Afik PRECAST CONCRETE WALL PANELS Office Building Pre North (' •olio Drive) Elevation Scale : 3/32' a 1' -0' Warehouse beyond FIN. FLR. ELEV. 907.15' FIN. GRADE 613' 4" 76' -4' 0 Cse 0 Office 3,000 SF Warehouse No. 3 2,100 SF Conference 16x16 Break Room 16,116 Fire Riser Room Office Office 10x12 10x12 Office 10x12 Office 10x12 Office 16x12 Store Room Wo L-Raom 38x9 Store Rooms 19x12 Warehouse No. 4 2,800 SF 8x10 OH Door r 18x10 I I OH Door Reception Men Elect. & Tele. oom Warehouse No. 1 7,000 SF Warehouse No. 2 7,000 SF 10X12 Drive -In 011 Door r Wrhse. Restroam Wrhse. Offices L_J 8 10 OH Doo L_J 8x10 OH Doo Prellminar Floor Plan 127' 4' 17' 4" Seale : 5/32' - 1' -0" North David J. Kelly Architect, Inc. Tune 595 3955 Vest Seth St Mnvspexs, settees,. 55. , 19521 925_5220 Consultants RECEIVED SEP 1 1 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES Certification 1 t•era eeets, rout vet — MM v+Yr M •�rrtt -' IeM�+ e••■••.rr and tr.i 9 • • aI K 15 tt•te K Mrmm•t• On4t1 Joseph Kelly Reg. No.: 15254 Comm. No. : 00.031 Drown By : Kelly Date Issued :09.11.2000 Revisions • Project A New Distribution Office /Warehouse for North American Composites, Co. Apollo Business Pork Apollo Drive Lino Lakes, MN Drawing Title Preliminary Floor Plan; Apollo Drive Elevation Scale As Noted Sheet Number a2.1 • •UCi11IU•I(♦UUII.(♦uI.....Iulll MIMI11 11101IUUuul •lUUUUIiiuIUuUUI(♦ul(♦l1111M uRUM111 ELEV. - 0 ELEV. + 26' -4' ELEV. + FIN. FLR. ELEV. 907.15' = -------------------------------- 10'x12 — — — — — — — — — 8'x10' 8' x 10' 8'x10' — — — — — — — — — OH Door Drive -in OH Door OH Door OH Door Loading Warehouse beyond Prellminar East Elevation Main Entrance Office David J. Kelly Architect, Inc. iw. 205 99es Vest SOei 05 *.*Us. IN,esot. 55424 0524 922_2220 Consultants RECEIVED SEP 1 1 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES Scale : 3/32 - 11111111 Preliminary 5outh Elevation Worehouse ILoading beyond Score : 3/32 - 1' -0" PRE - FINISHED STANDING -SEAM METAL ROOFING INSULATED ALUM /GLASS WINDOW UNITS PRECAST CONCRETE WALL PANELS "'_A Office beyond Preliminary West Elevation - R623' -0" Warehouse ELEV. + 26' -4" FIN. FLR. ELEV. 907.15' FIN. GRADE Scale : 3/32 - i' -0" Certification 1 Selby .testy tnt 15w pen w on.... or ,.e.t tom "e.. w 9enml era woo 1 in My uenrsos M.A.. ws K . 15. 9511.* Iw.,..v1'� OaNd Joseph Kelly Reg. NO : .!5254 Comm. No. :00.031 Drawn By : Kelly Dote Issued :09.11.2000 Revisions • Project A New Distribution Office /Warehouse for North American Composites, Co. Apollo Business Pork Apollo Drive Lino Lakes, MN Drawing Title Preliminary Exterior Elevations Scale As Noted Sheet Number a3.1 • • Cont. FINISHED METAL ROOF EDGE FLASHING. CUSTOM 'Cattoir PATTERN on PRECAST CONC. WALL PANEL — 5MOOTH FINISHED CONC. on THIS FIFVAIION ONI 5 EXACT CONC. FINISH(es) to be VERIFIED w/ SELECTED PRECAST CONC. PANEL MANUFACTURER. 'WOE RAKE' FINISH on TYPICAL PRECAST CONC. WALL PANEL w/ INTEGRAL TINT (or Field pointed) i 111 1.11_1_1._ T ARCing METAL ROOF over 5/11 DOCK DOORS beyond. FLOOR LINE ELEV.: 907.15' IIr South (I 35W) Elevation Warehouse Scale : 1/8 = 1' -0" PRE — FINISHED STANDING —SEAM METAL ROOFING INSULATED ALUM /GLASS WINDOW UNITS HM DOOR/FRAME w/ SHIELD D EGRESS LIGHT. PROVO CONC. STOOP w/ CMU FOUNDATION on CONC. STRIP 001150. 8' —(1" wide PRECAST CONCRETE WALL PANELS w/ 'WIDE RAKE' FINISH and INTEGRAL TINT (or field painted). Hest Elevation Office beyond L 8' —D" wide PC Wall Panel — —5,�" 53'—) r 2" I 3 -0" 1 5'— 4 •/ T 4" 4 "-1 12" ti A-. 5— 3' rLi .eA•., n.. SMOOTH CONC. F1N15H INTEGRAL TINT. Flootline Grade IGattaili Pattern Scale : 1/4 = 1' -0" Warehouse Scole : 1/8 = HM DOOR/FRAME w/ SHIELDED EGRESS UGHT, PROVIDE CONC. STOOP w/ CAW FOUNDATION on CONC. STRIP FOOTING. ELEW a 26' —e" FIN. FIR. ELEV. 907.15' David J. Kelly Architect, Inc. Suite 205 3925 Vest 501h Si Nrewpppis• morose.. 55424 (952) 922-2220 Consultants Certification I nwwoy notify en ey 1M1 fns p smiesosoo. or »pw. »e Ra..e. 02 ire Dote 0. Plooese1. rt David Joseph Kelly Reg No • 15254 Comm. No. :00.031 Drown By : Kelly Dote Issued :10.26,2000 Revisions • Project A New Distribution Office /Warehouse for North American Composites, Co. Apollo Business Park 300 Apollo Drive Lino Lakes, MN Drawing Title Design Development: Exterior Elevations Scale As Noted Sheet Number R.vl..d for City Rauht, dated 11.02.2000 Not far Construction a3.2 tC GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN PEEP ) 1 mob - 30 tt I RECEIVED NOV 0 1 2000 C;TY OF LINO LAKES alb ens 10 90 96 a. 901 CAT°1 ,�- oR1vE PCD i•t 08 31 9eb 1n 40x. CATOI TC 9°1A_9081b 1C 084. r. A °^ 4 / via 23 eagd.erPg T[4as .004.23 \ 90e 3..103 T. CO. 403 8.3' • J9yis // // 1.66 - 49^392 908 - 9 ,9 6 N 04 t • 594635 499 HAY BALE CHECK DIKES 699 35 /x900 i..J. HAY BALE CHECK DIKES 14' CEDAR MCI 9.5 9908 900 l 902 904 404 94 9j L 1 .8°68 lynCr 694 / i 90 193 J: / qp2 G1 HAY QADIKES / 8q9 899 9974 • Dfo 99.48 K39968 / 398.: / / 495 63..o., ' 499 563 / 3 40 / .4.4. OP r._ 0000 x[xR POST rrt v ,iA96.°ccrto citiiiiex _o-rwr: 3- STM..9 .xnn DRG NOTES e. 90" HAY BALE 4,55.!' CHECK DIKES ;' SJQfP O 7O // J0 i Q .r. • 6' MINIMUM 1/2' CLEAR AGGREGATE ROCK/WOOD CHIP C❑NSTRUCTI ❑N ENTRANCE ND T TO SCALE BALE CHECK DETAIL .. a Jr n . - p TC.. Boles placed on "'edge butted tent PI A SEE DETAIL- - 9ELOW NOTE: tint A must be higher tnat Point 8 PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING. rNS TALL SLT FENCE m L:CAr•,ONS SHOWN OR AS DIRECTED B1' THE ENGINEER. ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE WILL BE REOOREC wt -,ERE LOCAL COND'T;CL:S REOt:IRE ROUGH GRADING SHALL PROCEED ON AN AREA 8Y AREA BASIS TO U!N;Mt2E t- NCOMPLETED AREAS. AS EACH AREA OUTSIDE THE STREET IS GRADED. PROVIDE NATIVE "0PSOIL. SEED. AND MULCH ANCHORED WITH A STRAIGHT SET DISC. WITHIN 48 HOOKS OF FINE GRADING MAINTAIN AND REPAIR SILT FENCES (INCLUDING REMOVAL 0'>F ACCOMULATED sum UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. SEED TO BE MnDOT TYPE 500. MULCH TYPE 1 (2 TONS, /ACRE) SEED FOR PENDING AREAS TO BE anDOT TYPE 154 90T MEADOw U!rt TOPSOIL TO BE RESPRE AG TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES ON THE PROW. 44(0 R: AR PORTONS OF THE LOTS. 302 5 901 5 900.8 DI TCH BOTTOM RIP RAP DITCH CHECK DETAIL �s2 J J - d 6 METRO ,:.4A 5:;.: LAND YO SURVEYING .4 A ffi CAMP:A • 412 East County Road D. Little Canada. WI 55117 Telephone: (851)786 -0112 Fas. (951)788 -0512 1•: -mail: surveymnetrols.com z J � a (n O G V Z a (ci < 4 z a ". O 4 o 13:". GRADING PLAN g U • E \daps- greg \_lc Johnson\tkclo_int \SIT OUT 11...1)1./G 10'25.'2O 12'4147 FM :1i' z GRAPHIC SCALE HI JO ( 54 PELT ) 1 Inch - 3C R I RECEIVED NOV 0 1 2000 C +TY OF LINO LAKES V. FND'80B_ C+. 15„00 f 41. 9,36,7:66 b7 97 8 58 /L 7Zg. R .,,.5841 METRO LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 412 East County Road 0. Little Canada MK 55117 Telephone: (651)766 -0112 Pac (851)766 -0012 E -meU: eurvey.metrole.com FINISHED GRADE 906.30 RUBBER GASKETS ALL JOINTS PRECAST OR INVERT CURED 894.50 20' NEENAH CASTING Ot EOUAL NEENAH CASTING OR T EQUAL. 2 -4 2'THICK V %NiiR TA� JOINTS. PLASTERS ADJUSTING RINGS 11\11 OUTSIDE, STRIKE INSIDE CCCLEAN. JOINTS. PLASTER OUTSIDE, STRIKE INSIDE CLEAN. ECCENTRIC PRE -CAST CONE SECTION ECCENTRIC PRE -CAST I6' CONE SECTION 6 4' - 5'61N 5'1IN R.CP. BARREL SECTIQ4 Iii„E,,,,..... gni SECTION SANITARY MANHOLE (ECCENTRIC) BRICK OR HORSESHOES ON ALL SIDES SANITARY MANHOLE DETAIL FILL 154 VOIDS VITH CONCRETE FINISHED GRADE PROP. 906.27 .�. 6' "7 �I R MN.3TLUCT MANH L RT HALL BES L > 0 T 7 DE CF(TION SANITARY MANHOLE (ECCENTRIC) ff EX. 90327 GASKETS ALL JOINTS 878.00 J C JOHNSON CONSULTANT UTILITY PLAN j g N 5 U • RECEIVED NOV 0 12000 CITY OF LINO LAKES Apollo E)r1ve FND, RLS PT. 9808 Sod w/ Irrigation PLANTNG KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME QUANTITY SIZE 1 FLOWERING CRAB APPLE Molus 'Thunderchild' 3 2 JAPANESE TREE LILAC clump of 3 Syringo reticulolo 'Ivory Silk' 2 3 RED - TWIGGED DOGWOOD Cornus stolonifero 'Cardinal' 12 4 PURPLE LEAF SAND CHERRY Prunus x cisteno 2 5 POTENTILLA Potentilla 'Gold Drop' 21 6 ARBOR VITAE Thujo occidentolis 'Brandon' 7 7 CLIMBING TRUMPET HONEYSUCKLE Lonicera x Drownii 'Dropmore' 7 7 B SWAMP WHITE OAK Duercus bicolor 1 2.5" B & B 9 RIVER BIRCH Betulo nigro 'Heritage' 2 10 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glouca 'Densoto' 9 11 AUSTRIAN PINE Q Pious Nigro 8 12 ASH - PATMORE L Fraxinus Pennsylvonico Lonceoloto 4 2.5" 8 & B 13 YEW Toxus media 'Dark green' 3 14 PIN OAK Q Ouercus Polvetris 2 2.5" B & B 1 15 WHITE OAK © Ouercus Albo 2 2.5' B & 8 1 Planting Schedule Nom. 25' long x 3' deep NATIVE FLOWER GARDEN w/ ASSORTMENT of CONEFLOWERS (Echinoceo), DAY LILIES (Hemerocallis), TULIPS, DAFFODILS and CHRYSANTHEMUMS. ■ Trash Enclosure See Detail 2 /LI.I - /14 ll \ \\' \\ Preliminary Landscape Plan • — s. VII \ \1j /7 /11 \�_ \\1 Prairie Seed Blend Marsh Seed Blend Infiltration Area See Sheet CI.I Scole : 1" = 20' -0" Project North 4, REDWOOD CATE 4" MASONRY to MATER OFFICE EXTERIOR MASONRY B" REINFORCED CMU INNER WYTHE. PAINT EXPOSED SURFACES. L Trash Enclosure 4" MASONRY to MATCH OFFICE EXTERIOR MASONRY 8" REINFORCED CAW Preliminary INNER WrTHE Landscape Plan David J. Kelly Architect, Inc. Suite 205 3925 vest Sstn St Nnrwop00s. Wwsotu 55424 952, 922 -2220 Consultants Landscape Architect Nestingen Design 3749 47th Ave. So. KMeopolis, 9191 55406 -2914 1612)724 -1300 Certification r nett, < iv me. Ins 04•4, 04•4, ...Mr, we Prob.". by or wober efro.rt or ire blilt Or mhesess. 0nhd Joseph KNIT Reg. No, - 15254 Comm. No, :00.031 Drawn By : Kelly Dote Issued :09,11.2000 Revisions • ® Landscape Plan Rashid 10.31.2000 per CRy Comments Project A New Distribution Office /Warehouse for North American Composites, Co. Apollo Business Park Apollo Drive Lino Lakes, Mn Drawing Title 6' -0" wide 5' -0" deep EPDXY - COATED CONCRETE SEAR -on- GRADE. Scale : 1/4" = 1' -0" Scale As Noted Sheet Number for Sits Plan Review Only Revised 10.31.2000 Not for Construction L1.1 • • AGENDA ITEM 7C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 11/1300 TOPIC: Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for North American Composites Vote Required: 3/5 BACKGROUND: Earlier this evening the Economic Development Authority held a public hearing regarding a proposed $122,250 business subsidy in the form of Tax Increment Financing to North American Composites, a subsidiary of Interplastic Corporation, for the construction of a 25,000 square foot distribution facility in the Apollo Business Center. State statute requires that a public entity —in this case the EDA —must find that the granting of a subsidy meets the best interests of the city, and a business subsidy agreement needs to be approved by both the EDA and the city council. This subsidy is to be used to write down a portion of the cost of land and assessments on the project according to the terms of a development agreement. The subsidy agreement is a part of the development agreement, and specifies the commitment the company is making regarding wages and jobs, plus the annual reporting that is required. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the business subsidy for North American Composites 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • (i) For purposes of this Article X, the Developer includes any party to whom the Developer leases the Property or Minimum Improvements. Section 10.2. Job and Wage Goals. Within two years after the earlier of the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion or the date the Developer occupies the Property (the "Compliance Date "), the Developer shall cause to be created at least three new full -time equivalent jobs on the Pro errand shall cause the wages for the three new employees to be no less than $,26,-0.10 r, exc Virve of benefits. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if the wage and job goals described in this Section 10.2 are met by the Compliance Date, those goals are deemed satisfied despite the Developer's continuing obligations under Sections 10.1(0 and 10.4. The Authority may, after a public hearing, extend the Compliance Date by up to one year, provided that nothing in this Section 10.2 will be construed to limit the Authority's legislative discretion regarding this matter. Section 10.3. Remedies. If the Developer fails to meet the goals described in Section 10.1(c), the Developer shall repay the Authority a pro rata share of the amount of the subsidy granted by this Agreement, plus interest on said amount at the implicit price deflator as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.50, subd. 2, accrued from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion to the date of payment. The repayment shall be made by the Developer within thirty (30) days of written demand by the Authority. The term pro rata share means percentages calculated as follows: • (i) if the failure relates to the number of jobs, the jobs required less the jobs created, divided by the jobs required; • (ii) if the failure relates to wages, the number of jobs required less the number of jobs that meet the required wages, divided by the number of jobs required; (iii) if the failure relates to maintenance of the warehouse /distribution facility in accordance with Section 10.1(0, 60 less the number of months of operation as a warehouse /distribution facility (where any month in which the facility is in operation for at least 15 days constitutes a month of operation), commencing on the date of the Certificate of Completion ending with the date the facility ceases operation as determined by the Authority, divided by 60; and (iv) if more than one of clauses (i) through (iii) apply, the sum of the applicable percentages, not to exceed 100 %. Nothing in this Section 10.3 shall be construed to limit the Authority's remedies under Article IX hereof. In addition to the remedy described in this Section 10.3 and any other remedy available to the Authority for failure to meet the goals stated in Section 10.1(c), the Developer agrees and understands that its may not a receive a business subsidy from the Authority or any grantor as defined in the Business Subsidy Act for a period of five years from the date of the failure or until the Developer satisfies its repayment obligation under this Section 10.3, whichever occurs first. • RHB- .188393v2 LN 140 -74 17 • • • AGENDA ITEM 7 D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: Clearwater Creek Business Center Amendments to Conditions of Approval VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The preliminary plat for the Clearwater Creek Business Center was approved by the City December 15, 1997. The approval of the Dairy Queen site plan includes the condition that the final plat must be completed. Standard City policy for final plat approval requires that the conditions of approval must be met. There were 11 conditions approved with the preliminary plat. Two of the conditions refer to floodplain issues: #7. The 100 -year floodplain elevation, building pad elevations, and street elevations are identified. #10. That there be a letter of map revision obtained by the applicant from FEMA relating to the floodplain. These conditions have not been met. However, the floodplain map has been revised for areas around the Dairy Queen site. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has requested a new Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) application including additional technical information before further revising the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) in this area. Because the Dairy Queen is awaiting final plat approval, staff recommends amending the conditions of approval as follows: Delete preliminary plat conditions 7 and 10 that were approved December 15, 1997 and replace them with the following condition: Within one year of final plat approval, the City of Lino Lakes will prepare and submit a LOMR application to redefine the Zone A area located at the southeast corner of Main Street/21st Avenue. This generally includes the area to be occupied by the proposed Dairy Queen and the existing Amoco. All costs related to this work will be charged against the trunk credits for the Clearwater Creek Business Center. Clearwater Creek Business Center November 13, 2000 page 2 OPTIONS 1. Approve the amendment to the December 15, 1997 conditions of approval as described in the staff report. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • PRELIMINARY PLAT ' v!EP /f97 ,VRWATER CREEK BUSINESS CE-N BITUMINOUS ROAD Li A III ,� T f• r r� T Iv1 it 11\I 1 rf r- r- 1 • 40 1 4 -411 • 909.E — � 1 \t 40i I �I ZONING I_d i1DUST IAL f' \I 1-•1 \_♦ I\ :; >r` •. 1 1 545.._ 9 - \�\ ° E ∎_�s _ \_ Ili '- =. -___-m ` ___ ?Z :� l : - I— \ - I \//' ,\\. \\ 1 1 1 ,\ �/ i1: \ \ \ \\ Di ! / s i z °� / - \\\\ \\ : 1,^ , ooh \.�' 'i�r�4b .\\.\\\\‘\,‘ \ I /' 1 / �', ' i // \ \1 \\\ \ 1 Y/ / 1 �l 11 i r' \� \1\` / i i3�� 1 \ I� 1°')1\\‘\k I` a?I � IIII SI 41 w IOW 1111 Will ■ / 1 X11 �_9° /.—�_ �/ itn III \ / / ✓ Olt \ \♦ // / / IN, p a illI \ ° —/ / 1 IIII B� 1 i I mIII1 `' - •IIII \\ \\ ( I \ \l4 mill) \\ \I 1 1°0� VII \ \ `' • 1 io MI ,0 /III ill 03 75.0 265 001 ZONING DUS TRIAL VEST 1/4 CORNER )F SEC. 24, T31, R22 ■NOKA CO. MON. t4 589.47'03'W ,� �92 iS I 1 I r 903 z 902 O � 3 01 279. / / 111 II 14 III 11 iv 111 I11 ) / / -- SOU LINE OF'T OF E NW 114 taA 40ID40 ODO z 3 0 0 J W J d in g APPROXIMATE SCALE w LL O 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 I NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM o S as- a▪ . 1 A1N1100 NOIJNIHSVM AINn00 V)ION`d v z 0 N AUVCINno9 AINnoo V W z 0 N V W z 0 N CORPORATE LIMITS COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 15,1997 Ms. Wyland represented that the conditional use permit criteria can be met in this case and following approval by the Planning and Zoning Board, Staff recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Drainage easements be provided over all wetlands. 2. The driveway and storage building location be subject to all applicable setbacks and subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Building Inspector. 3. Landscaping plans be reviewed and approved by the CPTED Officer and City Forester. 4. A turnaround be provided for emergency vehicles, if required by the Fire Chief. 5. The second access be subject to approval by Anoka County. Ms. Wyland pointed out that there is no immediate need for this expansion; therefore, compliance with the necessary requirements is not urgent. Mayor Landers asked if authorization for the additional property access would be required from both Ramsey and Anoka counties. Ms. Wyland explained that the access would only apply to Anoka County. Mr. Ahrens further explained that, upon request for approval from Anoka County, any need for involvement of Ramsey County would surface and be addressed. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the amended conditional use permit for Incarnation Cemetery, 899 Ash Street. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of aPraelimtnafyPlar fo usin s'ritk t the Intersection / of Main Street and 21st Avenue, Gerald Rehbein - Ms. Wyland explained that T & G r! Properties Inc. has requested preliminary plat approval for an eight -lot commercial subdivision entitled Clearwater Creek Business Center. The subject 23.3 -acre site is located south of Main Street between I -35E and the eastern boundary of the City of Centerville. The property is zoned General Business (GB), and lies within the MUSA. Generally, the proposed lots meet or exceed the minimum 20,000 - square -foot area requirement, ranging in size from 1.4 to 2.5 acres. All proposed lots also exceed the minimum lot width requirement with the exception of Lot 2, Block 1, which is recommended for expansion in order to provide consistency throughout the subdivision. The proposed subdivision project would include the upgrading of 21st Avenue to include bituminous surfacing. The western one -half of this roadway lies within the jurisdiction of the City of Centerville. The City Engineer is currently negotiating a joint powers agreement with Centerville for the construction of 21st Avenue. From 21st Avenue the subdivision enters a cul- de -sac that will be known as Northern Lights Boulevard. This roadway is currently shown as a 60 -foot right -of -way. According to the streets standards of the City code, there is a requirement that commercial and industrial streets be 80 feet in width. Staff feels that 80 feet is somewhat 13 COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 15, 1997 excessive, and hopes to bring to Council in January a revision to that standard as it pertains arterial streets. Therefore, Staff suggests that a 60 -foot right -of -way is appropriate in this instance. All lots demonstrate compliance with applicable GB District setback requirements. There is a number of wetlands located on the subject property, and a mitigation plan has been submitted to and approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. The grading and drainage plan remains subject to approval by the City Engineer. Ms. Wyland explained that plat approval would end at the southern boundary of Outlot A, and it is recommended that the southern boundary be designated consistently on the plat. Easements will be required over this drainage swale and ponding area. Additionally, utility and drainage easements will be required along all lot lines. Utilities are subject to review by the City Engineer. The Park Board has reviewed this request, and no action has been taken as dedication is applicable to buildings as they are constructed. The extreme northwest portion of the subject site lies within the City's 100 -year flood plain, bringing into question the need for proper elevation of the streets and building pads, as well as recognition of hydric soils with respect to possible development limitations. A letter of map revision from FIMA will be a condition of approval of this project. The Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on this item, and Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat, based on the following conditions: 1. Consideration is given to expanding the width of Lot 2, Block 1 in a manner such that it is consistent with other lot widths within the subdivision. 2. The right -of -way width of Northern Lights Boulevard is expanded from 60 feet to 80 feet in accordance with City subdivision standards for commercial/industrial streets. (Staff intends to present a revision to this standard for Council consideration.) 3. A wetland mitigation plan is submitted and approved by the City Engineer. 4. Consideration is given to identifying full development of the property (future lot configuration) on the preliminary plat and establishing an outlot (or outlots) on the final plat to accommodate future development phases. Although Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat at this time, Ms. Wyland suggested that, in the event there is a buyer for Lot 1 only, at the time of final platting consideration be given to platting all but Lot 1 as an outlot allowing for flexibility in marketing the balance of the site on a parcel by parcel basis with minor modification to the preliminary plat. 5. The preliminary plat and grading plan depictions of Outlot A are revised to be graphically consistent. 6. Soil borings are taken which demonstrate the buildability of the subject property. 14 COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 15, 1997 7. The 100 -year flood plain elevation, building pad elevations, and street elevations are identified. 8. The Park Board provides recommendation regarding park dedication requirements. (This recommendation has been obtained.) 9. The City Engineer provides comment and recommendation regarding: a. City maintenance responsibilities associated with 21st Avenue. b. Grading and drainage. c. Easement establishment. d. Utilities. e. Flood plain containment. f. Hydric soil limitations. 10. That there be a letter of map revision obtained by the applicant from FIMA relating to the flood plain. Mr. Wessel commented that engineering issues are paramount, and should be reviewed in detail. He added that Mr. Rehbein and Economic Development have worked for the past two years to make this quadrant commercially developable. This is important to the City in light of the status of the commercial property opposite the I -35, which has not developed as anticipated. Council Member Lyden recommended increasing the square footage of Lot No. 2 by moving the south property line of Lot No. 4 to align with Lots No. 1 and 4. Mr. Wessel suggested that the applicant provide input on that issue. Mr. Ahrens explained that at a prior work session alignment of 21st Avenue was discussed. This shared roadway will require a joint powers agreement. With respect to utilities, a feasibility report is forthcoming which will provide Council with information regarding installation and assessment. Soil borings are being conducted to provide building foundation and road design requirements. Mr. Ahrens explained that the applicant has submitted information to FIMA with respect to flood plain containment. He added that the flood plain is planned for containment within a specific "floodway ", similar to the manner in which Centerville dealt with Clearwater Creek. With respect to the right -of -way issue, Mr. Ahrens explained that in this circumstance 80 feet would be excessive. A 60 -foot right -of -way would best accommodate the subject property road design. The 21st Avenue/Main Street intersection will be addressed within the feasibility report. Mayor Landers asked if cutting back the easement to 60 feet would pose a problem for Centerville, as this is a shared roadway. Mr. Ahrens explained that the 21st Avenue easement would remain at 80 feet. The 60 -foot easement is proposed for Northern Lakes Boulevard. 15 • • COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 15, 1997 Council Member Bergeson asked about the origin for utilities. Mr. Ahrens explained that water main would come from Cedar Street alignment. A lift station at Cedar Street and Otter Lake Road could provide sanitary sewer, which would require jacking under Cedar Street. However, the Metropolitan Council has reviewed three alignments addressing capacity issues, and the recommendation is to run a Met Council sewer line along Main Street. This would bring sanitary service from the north. Additionally, Mr. Ahrens stated that he met recently with Centerville engineers and public works personnel, and they are receptive to his suggestions. Council Member Bergeson asked about timing. Mr. Ahrens explained that the Met Council's plan is for design in 1998, construction in 2000. If the City of Lino Lakes initiates this project in the Spring, it would go forward with a portion from 21st Avenue east to the new Otter Lake Road alignment,-with reimbursement from Met Council when the project is completed. Another joint powers agreement with Met Council would be required to cover this issue. Council Member Lyden again asked about the reconfiguration of Lot No. 2 to conform with the balance of the lots. Mr. Rehbein explained that only the first lot will be platted and, with the balance remaining an outlot, each lot can be platted as proposed for development. Mr. Wessel explained that the Apollo Business District was subdivided in this manner. Council Member Lyden then asked about the location for the proposed off -site mitigation. Mr. Rehbein explained that the mitigation is proposed for the area surrounding his office in Centerville. Mr. Ahrens reviewed that he has reviewed the mitigation plans and Mr. Rehbein is exceeding the 2 to 1 ratio. Mayor Landers asked if the City of Lino Lakes should be concerned with mitigation going to another city. Mr. Rehbein explained that the mitigation would remain within the same watershed, and that the primary concern should be the benefit to Lino Lakes. Mr. Wessel echoed that Lino Lakes will certainly benefit from this mitigation arrangement. Mr. Rehbein suggested that the proposal represents a number of environmentally sound possibilities, including better area for wildlife. Mayor Landers asked about the status of this project should the proposed joint powers agreement fail. Mr. Ahrens suggested that the roadway could be located entirely within Lino Lakes. Council Member Kuether asked about Mr. Ahrens feelings with respect to the joint powers agreement, to which Mr. Ahrens responded that he is confident agreement can be reached. Mayor Landers pointed out that state aid was a component in previous discussions with Centerville. Council Member Lyden asked if the proposed development for Lot 1 would remain plausible should the roadway be located within Lino Lakes. Mr. Ahrens indicated that the entire site would then have to be shifted east approximately 40 feet, but that it could still be constructed. • Mayor Landers asked about the anticipated timeline with respect to the joint powers agreement. Mr. Ahrens indicated that he hopes to have the agreement by the January, 1998 Council meeting. 16 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 15,1997 Council Member Kuether moved to approve the preliminary plat for Clearwater Creek Business Park, Main Street and 21st Avenue, pursuant to the conditions presented and contingent upon a joint powers agreement with Centerville. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. / 7 • • AGENDA ITEM 7 E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: Final Plat: Clearwater Creek Business Center VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The preliminary plat for the Clearwater Creek Business Center was approved by the City in December 1997. Standard City policy for final plat approval requires: 1. Final plat drawing that substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat 2. Complete development agreement 3. Financial securities as described in the development agreement 4. Title commitment approval by City Attorney 5. Conditions of approval must be met (the conditions approved at time of preliminary plat approval) ANALYSIS 1. Final plat drawing that substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat. The approved preliminary plat included four lots in Block 1, four lots in Block 2, and an outlot of 7+ acres in the southern portion of the site. The outlot is 32% of the site. The proposed final plat includes two lots in Block 1 and two lots in Block 2, with the remainder of the site in a large Outlot A. Outlot A is approximately 70% of the site. On the submitted final plat, Block 2 includes two lots where the preliminary plat had only one larger lot. Staff does not view this as a problem at this time because so much of the site has yet to be carved into separate lots. Platting the lots in phases is not unusual, and was anticipated at the time of preliminary plat approval. Condition number four was: #4. Consideration is given to identifying full development of the property (future lot configuration) on the preliminary plat and establishing an outlot (or outlots) on the final plat to accommodate future development phases Clearwater Creek Business Center Final Plat November 13, 2000 page 2 In the future, if the landowner ultimately wants to create more total lots than were approved by the preliminary plat, the City can require a new preliminary plat. Since we do not know how many lots will ultimately be created, staff is comfortable with the number of lots on the submitted final plat. 2. Complete development agreement 3. Financial securities as described in the development agreement This is an unusual situation in that improvements were installed several years ago without a development agreement or financial securities. The City Attorney and City Engineer have been negotiating with the developer regarding the costs of the various elements of the plat. Negotiations are nearly complete. We expect that by the time of the November 13 meeting the parties will have agreed to the terms of the development agreement, including any financial securities. 4. Title commitment approval by City Attorney The City Attorney is reviewing the title submittal. We will have the result of his review • by the November 13 meeting. 5. Conditions of approval must be met The conditions of approval have been satisfied. Conditions regarding the floodplain were to be amended as the previous agenda item at tonight's meeting. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plat. (Assuming all items are satisfied by meeting time.) 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • i/ece • CLEARWATER CREEK 4-�, BUSINESS CENTER � NORTH •S_ • • - - ,.__NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE , ' NW 1/4 OF SEC. 24, T31, R22 / 89`14'15 "E �... ::.;,.. ,. . =• ; 106.36 N85•o3'07`J► 402.00 S89.14'15" ' 213.22 p Q —o 40Ot — R � / x.35 317. 0 1 ' —� a0 40 DRAINAGE ..._ unury :' �'- — — 85100 n -- — - 9'7 / / a0 1- to 3 / \ m m m / _ . \ p N v.) r �' \ D N • 2 e \ 4� w ,r 00 a / h`. e_ 327.58 —'-�14 (..4**/ ?. , / /.' NORTHERN LIGHTS R' 4 :12.r,y 189 // + g 509'52 51 WBOULEVARD 367.90 a352goo 47 r -- -72501 —� 103.20 ��3504o8j I_ *3" 10. 01 0 In° 1 �I 0 I I N L N89- 52'51'E J 40 40 ✓ 225.01 1 I_ 1 1° 01 Ih 2 2 --I I '.I L J N89'52'51 -E 225.01 40.00 235.00 " N8r47'os "e } 275.00 275 589'47'03 "W t.j- 11 1313.92 1 N N tr (X Z O o 2 ' N Q 1-. yWO Oa N00'29'20 "E 0 00'Y9'20 "E1 3 202.47 589'4703 W 275.00 —� GRAPHIC SCALE e m oa mo ��J V ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch - 100 TL r 1 r s1 SOUTH L (OFFTHENW 1/4 OF SEC. 24, 1\ T31, R22 ,to / � 503.60 _1 N89'47'03 ".E 706.07 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS THUS: 4o Z 101 [ 10 1 1 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT UNES. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. PRELIMINARY PLAT — A7i'i"11�4° /997 EARWATER • CREEK BUSINESS CEt ZONING-GBJ INDUSTRIAL ZONING o '4 9 BITUMINOUS ROAD L < • 1 \ I IVI /\ 11 %1 4■ 1 1 e-% 1 1 • • i. • rsr - r --r' 1 1 . • I . 1 1 1 \ L— V— I tD \----;;;---------1--- r _ "tom = _ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \` \ \ r --- 240 1 17 _r_ _ -T /ammo :rum 1 T /� \9OB n IA/ /,2 Y / / / \�\ i -\ \ 1\ 1\ \ \` 1 11 i 1 69.1e 6� °• , \ 7 I 1 i X51 I r I _ / / ,/ r7 m\\‘\\\ \ 9�r :\ [i \\ \ \ \ \ o / / \ \\ 0 \ \ \'9 ?� ./, \ \ \\ \ \\ _£ -r IF• 1 kl \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ .1\ \\ \\ 1 \ •o / V \\ — , /\\1C) I �\ hl 1 / 87t2�sa ��/ / /x\ // �\ \ \` \ \fit •�'. i4 20o h° / r 41 \ \ \� \\ / / �i' // /'\ '\1\11\\ -r- / / a�/ / / ''\ \\ -z , r. / / / 1 / ( 1 \ \ \\ • _ . / / ooN.. 1 \ ` / 30.4 I\ , l \\ i 1 1 L1J 1.1 itg 1 1 ZOIVING INDUSTRIAL EST 1/4 CORNER SEC. 24. 731, R22 NOKA CO. MON. S89'47'03'W 1313.92 i • I r\ Lr ••1 \ • 903 2 902 - 276 DQ :,,, I • 1 LJ J I 1 \I 1 320 5°. 6oa•• � \ \\_1 1.36 ouTLO+ AI , , / / / / LINE OF E NW 1/4 905 // /; /,' / SOU OF . ' / / 1 \ • \ 03/ • AGENDA ITEM 7 F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution 00 -105 Electing to Continue Participation in Livable Communities Program VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The Metropolitan Livable Communities Act established a fund intended to address development issues in the Metro Area. To be eligible for the funds, a city must choose to participate in the program every year. The fund is divided into three accounts: Tax Base Revitalization Account: to clean up polluted land for new business development to provide new jobs. Local Housing Incentives Account: for affordable and life -cycle housing initiatives to meet the housing needs of people of various stages of life and various incomes. • Inclusionary Housing Account: to produce housing with a variety of prices and designs • which serve families with a range of incomes and housing needs. Livable Communities Demonstration Account: for models of compact, creative and efficient development and redevelopment. Lino Lakes received funding from this account to plan the Town Center, and recently applied for implementation money. Participation in the Program Numerous communities in the Metro Area submit applications for funding under the program. The funds are awarded on a competitive basis. In order to be eligible for consideration for any of the funding, a city must participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program. Participation includes working toward long -range goals for a greater variety of housing. We do not need to adopt new goals at this time. The ones adopted in 1998 continue to apply. There is no implied guarantee that the city will reach the goals. Current housing market conditions make this extremely difficult. A second difficulty is that the census data used to examine the housing picture is ten years old. The Metropolitan Council is aware of these difficulties. After the year 2000 census, the Met Council will re- examine the housing picture. • • • Resolution 00 -105 states that Lino Lakes elects to continue to participate in the program. We need to participate to be eligible for Town Center funding, including the $1.5 million grant we just applied for. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 00 -105. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00-105 RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT DURING 2001 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes 473.25 to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund includes the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account, the Local Housing Incentive Account, and the Inclusionary Housing Account; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and WHEREAS, a municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program; and WHEREAS, a municipality that elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Lino Lakes elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 2001. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2000 ATTEST: Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • • • • • AGENDA ITEM 7G STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 107, Adopt Assessment Roll, Clearwater Creek 4th Addition VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: On October 9, 2000, the City Council set the Public Hearing for the proposed assessments for the Clearwater Creek 4th Addition project for Monday, November 13, 2000. All necessary notices have been mailed to affected property owners indicating the amount of the assessment and the date of the hearing. The project is substantially complete and can now be assessed. This project involved developer installed improvements. The assessments associated with this project include Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Area, and Unit charges, Surface Water Management Fees, and Wearing Course Costs. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 - 107 adopting the assessment roll for the Clearwater Creek 4th Addition project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option No. 2, the adoption of Resolution 00 — 107. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 - 107 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF CLEARWATER CREEK 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Clearwater Creek 4th Addition, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 13 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. • Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of November, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on November 13, 2000. • Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • • • • Public Hearing — November 13, 2000 Clearwater Creek 4th Addition Assessment Basis: Area Units 16.70 acres 56 Assessment Summary: Sanitary Sewer Area Charge Sanitary Sewer Unit Charge Watermain Area Charge Watermain Unit Charge Future Wearing Course Surface Water Management 16.70 acres 56 units 16.70 acres 56 units $2,020 /acre $875 /unit $2,154 /acre $1,413 /unit Estimated Cost 16.70 acres $0.093 /square foot $ 33,734 $ 49,000 $ 35,972 $ 79,128 $ 58,800 $ 36,373 Total $293,007 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL CLEARWATER CREEK 4TH LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 11985 -002 PIN ADDRESS SANITARY SEWER AREA LOT BLK UNIT $602.39 /EACH SANITARY WATERMAIN SEWER AREA UNIT $642.36/EACH $875.00 /EACH FUTURE SURFACE WATERMAIN WEAR WATER UNIT COURSE MGMT $1,413 /EACH $1,050.00 /EACH $649.52/EACH 13- Nov -00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 253122410031 253122410032 253122410033 253122410034 253122410035 253122410036 253122410037 253122410038 253122410039 253122410040 253122410041 253122410042 253122410043 253122410044 253122410045 253122410046 253122410047 • 253122410048 253122410049 253122410050 253122410051 253122410052 253122410053 253122410054 253122410055 253122410056 253122410057 253122410058 253122410059 253122410060 253122410061 253122410062 2309 Tart Lake Rd 2315 Tart Lake Rd 2321 Tart Lake Rd 2327 Tart Lake Rd 2333 Tart Lake Rd 2339 Tart Lake Rd 2345 Tart Lake Rd 2351 Tart Lake Rd 2357 Tart Lake Rd 2363 Tart Lake Rd 2369 Tart Lake Rd 2375 Tart Rd/6568 Tart Ct 6574 Tart Court 6580 Tart Court 6579 Tart Court 6573 Tart Court 2393 Tart Rd/6567 Tart Ct 2396 Tart Rd/6565 Town Rd 2378 Tart Lake Rd 2372 Tart Lake Rd 2366 Tart Lake Rd 2360 Tart Lake Rd 2348 Tart Lake Rd 6519 Stella Lane 6513 Stella Ln/2353 65th 2365 65th Street 2371 65th Street 2377 65th Street 2383 65th Street 2395 65th Street 2396 65th Street 2390 65th Street 1 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 2 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 3 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 4 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 5 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 6 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 7 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 8 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 9 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 10 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 11 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 12 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 13 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 14 1 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 1 2 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 2 2 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 3 2 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 1 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 2 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 3 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 4 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 5 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 6 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 7 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 8 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 9 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 10 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 11 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 12 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 13 3 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 1 4 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 2 4 1 $ 602.39 $ 642.36 $ 875.00 $ 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 $ 649.52 $ 5,232.27 0 PIN 253122410063 253122410064 253122410065 253122410066 253122410067 253122410068 253122410069 253122410070 253122410071 253122410072 253122410073 253122410074 253122410075 253122420089 253122420090 253122410076 253122410077 253122410078 253122440002 253122440003 253122440004 253122430050 253122430051 253122430052 • TOTAL ADDRESS 2384 65th Street 2378 65th Street 2372 65th Street 2366 65th Street 6501 Stella Ln/2354 65th 6506 Stella Lane 6512 Stella Lane 6524 Stella Ln/2336 Tart Rd 2330 Tart Lake Road 2324 Tart Lake Road 2318 Tart Lake Road 2312 Tart Lake Road 2306 Tart Lake Road 2300 Delina Circle 2306 Delina Circle 2312 Delina Circle 2318 Delina Circle 2315 Delina Circle 2309 Delina Circle 2303 Delina Circle 2297 Delina Circle 6471 Clearwater Creek Dr. 6465 Clearwater Creek Dr. 6459 Clearwater Creek Dr. LOT 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 BLK 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 UNIT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 56 SANITARY SEWER AREA $602.39 /EACH $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 602.39 $ 33,733.84 WATERMAIN AREA $642.36/EACH $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 642.36 $ 35,972.16 SANITARY SEWER UNIT $875.00 /EACH WATERMAIN UNIT $1,413 /EACH 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 875.00 49,000.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 79,128.00 FUTURE SURFACE WEAR WATER COURSE MGMT $1,050.00 /EACH $649.52/EACH $ 1,050.00 $ 649.52 $ 1,050.00 $ 649.52 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 58,800.00 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 649.52 $ 36,373.12 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 5,232.27 $ 293,007.12 • • AGENDA ITEM 7H STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 108, Adopt Assessment Roll, Highland Meadows West VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: On October 9, 2000, the City Council set the Public Hearing for the proposed assessments for the Highland Meadows West project for Monday, November 13, 2000. All necessary notices have been mailed to affected property owners indicating the amount of the assessment and the date of the hearing. The project is substantially complete and can now be assessed. This project involved developer installed improvements. The assessments associated with this project include Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Area and Unit charges, Surface Water Management Fees, and Wearing Course Costs. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 - 108 adopting the assessment roll for the Highland Meadows West project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option No. 2, the adoption of Resolution 00 — 108. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 - 108 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Highland Meadows West, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. • 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 13 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. • • Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of November, 2000. • John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on November 13, 2000. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • • Public Hearing — November 13, 2000 Highland Meadows West Assessment Basis: Area Units 27.51 acres 107 Assessment Summary: Sanitary Sewer Area Charge Sanitary Sewer Unit Charge Watermain Area Charge Watermain Unit Charge Street Construction Surface Water Management 27.51 acres 107 units 27.51 acres 107 units $1,983 /acre $859 /unit $2,114 /acre $1,387 /unit Estimated Cost 27.51 acres $0.050 /square foot $ 54,552 $ 91,913 $ 58,156 $ 148,409 $ 112,117 $ 59,917 Total $525,064 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST • LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 11985 -002 PIN ADDRESS SANITARY SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN SEWER AREA AREA UNIT LOT BLK UNIT $509.83 /EACH $543.51/EACH $859.00 /EACH FUTURE SURFACE WATERMAIN WEARING WATER UNIT COURSE MGMT $1,387 /EACH $1,047.82/EACH $559.97/EACH 13- Nov -00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 083122130006 083122130007 083122130008 083122130009 083122130010 083122130011 083122130012 083122130013 083122130014 083122130015 083122130016 083122130017 083122130018 083122130019 083122130020 083122130022 083122130023 • 083122130024 083122130025 083122130026 083122130027 083122130028 083122130029 083122130030 083122130031 083122130032 083122130033 083122130034 083122130035 083122130036 083122130037 083122130038 7797 Marilyn Drive 7803 Marilyn Drive 7809 Marilyn Drive 7815 Marilyn Drive 7819 Marilyn Drive 7823 Marilyn Drive 7794 Marilyn Drive 7800 Marilyn Drive 7816 Marilyn Drive 7826 Marilyn Drive 7832 Marilyn Drive 7838 Marilyn Drive 7844 Marilyn Drive 7848 Marilyn Drive 7852 Marilyn Drive 7860 Marilyn Drive 652 Oak Lane 654 Oak Lane 7858 Marilyn Drive 674 Oak Lane 676 Oak Lane 678 Oak Lane 672 Oak Lane 696 Oak Lane 7839 Oak Court 7837 Oak Court 694 Oak Lane 690 Oak Lane 7833 Oak Court 7831 Oak Court 688 Oak Lane 664 Oak Lane 1 1 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 2 1 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 3 1 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 4 1 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 5 1 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 6 1 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 2 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 3 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 4 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 5 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 6 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 7 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 8 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 9 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 11 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 12 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 13 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 14 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 15 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 16 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 17 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 18 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 19 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 20 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 21 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 22 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 23 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 24 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 25 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 26 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 27 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 SANITARY SANITARY FUTURE SURFACE SEWER WATERMAIN SEWER WATERMAIN WEARING WATER AREA AREA UNIT UNIT COURSE MGMT TOTAL • PIN ADDRESS LOT BLK UNIT $509.83 /EACH $543.51 /EACH $859.00 /EACH $1,387 /EACH $1,047.82/EACH $559.97/EACH ASSESSMENT 083122130039 682 Oak Lane 28 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130040 684 Oak Lane 29 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130041 662 Oak Lane 30 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130042 7856 Marilyn Drive 31 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130043 656 Oak Lane 32 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130044 658 Oak Lane 33 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130045 7854 Marilyn Drive 34 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130046 7827 Oak Court 35 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130047 7825 Oak Court 36 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130048 7823 Oak Court 37 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130049 7821 Oak Court 38 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130050 7815 Oak Court 39 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130051 7813 Oak Court 40 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130052 7811 Oak Court 41 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130053 7817 Oak Court 42 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130054 7803 Oak Court 43 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130055 7801 Oak Court 44 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130056 7807 Oak Court 45 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130057 7805 Oak Court 46 2 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130058 7827 Marilyn Drive 1 3 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130059 7833 Marilyn Drive 2 3 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130060 7839 Marilyn Drive 3 3 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130061 7845 Marilyn Drive 4 3 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130062 7851 Marilyn Drive 5 3 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 • 083122130063 600 Lois Lane 1 4 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130064 606 Lois Lane 2 4 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130065 612 Lois Lane 3 4 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130066 618 Lois Lane 4 4 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130067 624 Lois Lane 5 4 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130068 630 Lois Lane 6 4 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130069 636 Lois Lane 1 5 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130070 642 Lois Lane 2 5 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130071 646 Lois Lane 3 5 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130072 652 Lois Lane 4 5 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130073 658 Lois Lane 5 5 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130074 664 Lois Lane 6 5 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130075 668 Lois Lane 7 5 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130076 674 Lois Lane 8 5 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 083122130077 680 Lois Lane 9 5 1 $ 509.83 $ 543.51 $ 859.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,047.82 $ 559.97 $ 4,907.13 • PIN 083122130078 083122130079 083122130080 083122130081 083122130082 083122130083 083122130085 083122130086 083122130087 083122130088 083122130089 083122130090 083122130091 083122130092 083122130093 083122130094 083122130096 083122130097 083122130098 083122130099 083122130100 083122130101 083122130102 083122130103 • 083122130104 083122130105 083122130106 083122130107 083122130108 083122130109 083122130110 083122130111 083122130112 083122130113 083122130114 083122120013 TOTAL ADDRESS 686 Lois Lane 692 Lois Lane 7871 Marilyn Drive 7865 Marilyn Drive 7859 Marilyn Drive 7853 Marilyn Drive 7863 Marilyn Drive 7861 Marilyn Drive 691 Oak Lane 689 Oak Lane 7857 Oak Court 7855 Oak Court 697 Oak Lane 695 Oak Lane 700 79th Street 696 79th Street 7884 Marilyn Drive 7885 Marilyn Drive 7883 Marilyn Drive 7882 Marilyn Drive 7878 Marilyn Drive 7879 Marilyn Drive 7877 Marilyn Drive 7876 Marilyn Drive 625 Lois Lane 631 Lois Lane 637 Lois Lane 643 Lois Lane 649 Lois Lane 655 Lois Lane 661 Lois Lane 673 Lois Lane 679 Lois Lane 676 Elizabeth Lane 7900 Marilyn Drive 7906 Marilyn Drive LOT BLK 10 5 11 5 12 5 13 5 14 5 15 5 2 6 3 6 4 6 5 6 6 6 7 6 8 6 9 6 1 7 2 7 4 7 5 7 6 7 7 7 8 7 9 7 10 7 11 7 1 8 2 8 3 8 4 8 5 8 1 9 2 9 1 10 2 10 3 10 1 11 2 11 UNIT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 107 SANITARY SEWER AREA $509.83 /EACH $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 509.83 $ 54,551.81 WATER AR $543.51 MAIN EA /EACH SANITARY SEWER UNIT $859.00 /EACH $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 543.51 $ 58,155.57 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 859.00 $ 859.00 $ 859.00 $ 859.00 $ 859.00 $ 859.00 $ 859.00 $ 859.00 $ 859.00 $ 859.00 $ 91,913.00 WATERMAIN UNIT $1,387 /EACH $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 1,387.00 $ 148,409.00 FUTURE SURFACE WEARING WATER COURSE MGMT ,047.82 /EACH $559.97/EACH 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 1,047.82 $ 112,116.74 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 559.97 $ 59,916.79 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 4,907.13 $ 525,062.91 • • • AGENDA ITEM 71 STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 109, Adopt Assessment Roll, Pheasant Hills Preserve 11th Addition VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: On October 9, 2000, the City Council set the Public Hearing for the proposed assessments for the Pheasant Hills Preserve 11th Addition project for Monday, November 13, 2000. All necessary notices have been mailed to affected property owners indicating the amount of the assessment and the date of the hearing. The project is substantially complete and can now be assessed. This project involved developer installed improvements. The assessments associated with this project include Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Area and Unit charges, Surface Water Management Fees, and Wearing Course Costs. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 - 109 adopting the assessment roll for the Pheasant Hills Preserve 11th Addition project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option No. 2, the adoption of Resolution 00 — 109. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 - 109 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE 11TH ADDITION WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Pheasant Hills Preserve 11th Addition, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of and therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 13 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. • Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of November, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION • Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on November 13, 2000. • • • Public Hearing — November 13, 2000 Pheasant Hills Preserve 11th Addition Assessment Basis: Area Units 17.08 acres 50 Assessment Summary: Sanitary Sewer Area Charge Sanitary Sewer Unit Charge Watermain Area Charge Watermain Unit Charge Future Wearing Course Surface Water Management 17.08 acres 50 units 17.08 acres 50 units $2,020 /acre $875 /unit $2,154 /acre $1,413 /unit Estimated Cost 17.08 acres $0.093 /square foot $ 34,502 $ 43,750 $ 36,790 $ 70,650 $ 45,000 $ 69,192 Total $299,884 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE 11TH . LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 11985 -002 PIN ADDRESS SANITARY SEWER AREA LOT BLK UNIT $690.04 /EACH WATERMAIN AREA $735.80 /EACH SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN UNIT UNIT $875.00 /EACH $1,413 /EACH 13- Nov -00 FUTURE SURFACE WEAR WATER COURSE MGMT TOTAL $900.00 /EACH $1,383.84/EACH ASSESSMENT 273122120038 273122120039 273122120040 273122120041 273122120042 273122120043 273122120044 273122110026 273122110027 273122110028 273122120045 273122120046 273122120047 273122120048 273122120049 273122120050 273122120051 • 273122120052 273122120053 273122120054 273122110029 273122110030 273122110031 273122110032 273122110033 273122110034 273122110035 273122110036 273122110037 273122110038 273122110039 273122110040 1434 Sherman Lake Rd 1440 Sherman Lake Rd 1452 Sherman Lake Rd 1456 Sherman Lake Rd 1460 Sherman Lake Rd 1466 Sherman Lake Rd 1470 Sherman Lake Rd 1474 Sherman Lake Rd 1478 Sherman Lake Rd 1482 Sherman Lake Rd 1435 Sherman Lake Rd 6703 Meadowlark Ct. 6709 Meadowlark Ct. 6715 Meadowlark Ct. 6716 Meadowlark Ct. 6710 Meadowlark Ct. 6704 Meadowlark Ct. 1461 Sherman Lake Rd 1469 Sherman Lake Rd 1477 Sherman Lake Rd 1483 Sherman Lake Rd 1489 Sherman Lake Rd 1495 Sherman Lake Rd 1501 Sherman Lake Rd 1507 Sherman Lake Rd 1513 Sherman Lake Rd 1519 Sherman Lake Rd 1525 Sherman Lake Rd 1531 Sherman Lake Rd 1537 Sherman Lake Rd 1543 Sherman Lake Rd 1549 Sherman Lake Rd 1 1 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 2 1 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 1 2 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 2 2 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 3 2 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 4 2 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 5 2 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 6 2 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 7 2 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 8 2 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 1 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 2 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 3 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 4 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 5 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 6 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 7 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 8 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 9 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 10 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 11 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 12 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 13 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 14 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 15 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 16 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 17 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 18 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 19 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 20 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 21 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 22 3 1 $ 690.04 $ 735.80 $ 875.00 $ 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 $ 5,997.68 • PIN 273122110041 273122110042 273122110043 273122110044 273122110045 273122110046 273122110047 273122110048 273122110049 273122110050 273122110051 273122110052 273122110053 273122110054 273122110055 273122110056 273122110057 273122110058 TOTAL • ADDRESS 1555 Sherman Lake Rd 1488 Sherman Lake Rd 1494 Sherman Lake Rd 1500 Sherman Lake Rd 1506 Sherman Lake Rd 1512 Sherman Lake Rd 1505 Osprey Court 1501 Osprey Court 1497 Osprey Court 1493 Osprey Court 1489 Osprey Court 1485 Osprey Court 1480 Osprey Court 1484 Osprey Court 1488 Osprey Court 1492 Osprey Court 1496 Osprey Court 1500 Osprey Court LOT 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 BLK 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 UNIT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50 SANITARY SEWER AREA $690.04 /EACH $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 690.04 $ 34,502.00 WATERMAIN AREA $735.80 /EACH $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 735.80 $ 36,790.00 SANITARY SEWER W UNIT $875.00 /EACH $1 FUTURE SURFACE ATERMAIN WEAR WATER UNIT COURSE MGMT TOTAL ,413 /EACH $900.00 /EACH $1,383.84/EACH ASSESSMENT $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 43,750.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 1,413.00 $ 70,650.00 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 900.00 $ 1,383.84 $ 5,997.68 $ 45,000.00 $ 69,192.00 $ 299,884.00 • • • AGENDA ITEM 7J STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 110, Adopt Assessment Roll, Trapper's Crossing 3rd Addition VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: On October 9, 2000, the City Council set the Public Hearing for the proposed assessments for the Trapper's Crossing 3rd Addition project for Monday, November 13, 2000. All necessary notices have been mailed to affected property owners indicating the amount of the assessment and the date of the hearing. The project is substantially complete and can now be assessed. This project involved developer installed improvements. The assessments associated with this project include Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Area and Unit charges, Lateral Utility charges (Bond Fund), and MSA Street assessments from the original assessment to Trapper's Crossing. The assessment roll distributes the original outlot charges from 1996 to the Tots platted as part of the 3rd Addition. Surface Water Management Fees and Wearing Course Costs are also assessed to the individual lots. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 - 110 adopting the assessment roll for the Trapper's Crossing 3rd project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option No. 2, the adoption of Resolution 00 — 110. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 - 110 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF TRAPPER'S CROSSING 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Trapper's Crossing 3rd Addition, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 13 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. . Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of November, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION • Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on November 13, 2000. • Public Hearing — November 13, 2000 • • Trapper's Crossing 3rd Addition Assessment Basis for the Wearing Course and Surface Water Management charges: Area 11.44 acres Units 35 Assessment Basis for the Area and Unit, Bond Fund, and MSA Street charges: Share of the original assessments to the Trapper's Crossing project pro -rated based on the area of the 3rd Addition plat; then divided by 35 units. Assessment Summary: Area and Unit Fund Bond Fund MSA Street Fund Future Wearing Course Surface Water Management 35 units 35 units 35 units $1,089.26/unit $3,171.45/unit $1,995.84/unit Estimated Cost 11.44 acres $0.050 /square foot $ 38,124 $ 111,001 $ 69,854 $ 43,930 $ 24,916 Total $287,825 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL TRAPPER'S CROSSING 3RD LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 410 COMMISSION NO. 11985 -002 PIN ADDRESS AREA & UNIT FUND LOT BLK UNIT $1,089.26/EACH BOND FUND $3,171.45/EACH [VISA STREET FUND $1,995,84/EACH FUTURE WEARING COURSE $1,255.14/EACH 13- Nov -00 SURFACE WATER MGMT TOTAL $711.89/EACH ASSESSMENT 333122120005 333122120006 333122120007 333122120008 333122120009 333122110060 333122110061 333122110062 333122120010 333122120011 333122120012 333122120013 333122120014 333122120015 333122120016 333122120017 333122120018 • 333122120019 333122120020 333122120021 333122120022 333122120023 333122120024 333122120025 333122120026 333122120027 333122120028 333122120029 333122120030 333122120031 333122120032 333122120033 6369 6375 6381 6387 6393 6398 6392 6386 6380 6374 Mineral Point Mineral Point Mineral Point Mineral Point Mineral Point Mineral Point Mineral Point Mineral Point Mineral Point Mineral Point 6368 Mineral Point 6360 Holly Drive 1082 South Trappers Crossing 1088 South Trappers Crossing 1094 South Trappers Crossing 1100 South Trappers Crossing 1073 Cripple Creek Pass 6320 Cripple Creek Court 6340 Cripple Creek Court 6350 Cripple Creek Court 6355 Cripple Creek Court 6347 Cripple Creek Court 6339 Cripple Creek Court 6331 Cripple Creek Court 6323 Cripple Creek Court 1054 Cripple Creek Pass 1060 Cripple Creek Pass 1066 Cripple Creek Pass 1072 Cripple Creek Pass 1084 Cripple Creek Pass 1090 Cripple Creek Pass 1096 Cripple Creek Pass 1 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 2 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 3 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 4 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 5 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 6 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 7 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 8 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 9 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 10 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 11 1 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 1 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 2 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 3 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 4 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 5 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 6 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 7 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 8 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 9 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 10 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 11 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 12 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 13 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 14 2 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 1 3 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 2 3 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 3 3 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 4 3 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 5 3 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 6 3 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 7 3 1 $ 1,089.26 $ 3,171.45 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,255.14 $ 711.89 $ 8,223.58 PIN •333122110063 333122110064 333122110065 TOTAL • ADDRESS 1102 Cripple Creek Pass 1108 Cripple Creek Pass 1114 South Trappers Crossing LOT 8 9 10 BLK 3 3 3 UNIT 1 1 1 35 AREA & UNIT FUND $1,089.26/EACH $ 1,089.26 $ 1,089.26 $ 1,089.26 $ 38,124.10 BOND FUND $3,171.45 /EACH $ 3,171.45 $ 3,171.45 $ 3,171.45 $ 111,000.75 MSA STREET FUND $1,995.84 /EACH $ 1,995.84 $ 1,995.84 $ 1,995.84 $ 69,854.40 FUTURE WEARING COURSE $1,255.14 /EACH $ 1,255.14 $ 1,255.14 $ 1,255.14 $ 43,929.90 SURFACE WATER MGMT $711.89/EACH $ 711.89 $ 711.89 $ 711.89 $ 24,916.15 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 8,223.58 $ 8,223.58 $ 8,223.58 $ 287,825.30 • • • AGENDA ITEM 7K STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 00 - 111, Adopt Assessment Roll, Individual Properties Which Requested Connection to City Utilities VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: On October 9, 2000, the City Council set the Public Hearing for the proposed assessments for the Individual Properties Which Requested Connection for Monday, November 13, 2000. All necessary notices have been mailed to affected property owners indicating the amount of the assessment and the date of the hearing. The assessments levied to the properties include Sanitary Sewer and Water Area and Unit charges and Lateral (front foot) charges. Also included are Surface Water Management charges which, per City policy, are collected when properties connect to City utilities. All of the property owners on the attached roll have requested connection to City utilities and have agreed to the proposed assessments. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 - 111 adopting the assessment roll for the Individual Properties Which Requested Connection. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option No. 2, the adoption of Resolution 00 — 111. eCouncil Member introduced the following resolution and moved • • its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 - 111 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES WHICH REQUESTED CONNECTION WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Individual Properties Which Requested Connection to City Utilities, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before December 13 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of November, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on November 13, 2000. • Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES WHICH REQUESTED CONNECTION TO CITY UTILITIES 410 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 11985 -002 PIN ADDRESS UNIT SANITARY SEWER AREA WATERMAIN AREA SANITARY SEWER UNIT WATERMAIN UNIT SANITARY FRONT FOOTAG E WATERMAIN FRONT FOOTAGE 13- Nov -00 SURFACE WATER TOTAL MGMT ASSESSMENT 053122440003 773 Main Street 1 $ 053122440007 757 Main Street 1 $ 073122340019 129 Lilac Street 1 $ 073122440018 347 Lilac Street 1 $ 083122110003 7997 Lake Drive 1 $ 083122110008 790 Main Street 1 $ 083122110048 7901 Nancy Drive 1 $ 083122110050 729 79th Street 1 $ 083122110057 782 Main Street 1 $ 083122140016 7855 Lake Drive 1 $ 083122140026 7831 Lake Drive 1 $ 083122140028 7811 Lake Drive 1 $ 083122430017/0018 700/702 77th Street 1 $ 173122220003 454 Lilac Street 1 $ 173122220004 448 Lilac Street 1 $ 193122140006 7074 Lake Drive 1 $ 193122220023 7164 Sunset Avenue 1 $ S 263122320001 1612 Birch Street 1 $ 313122130007 6251 Laurene Avenue 1 $ 313122140003 6289 Ware Road 1 $ 313122140006 6298 Hodgson Road 1 $ 313122230011 95 White Pine Road 1 $ TOTAL 22 $ 646.40 $ 666.60 $ 1,757.40 $ 498.94 $ 2,585.60 $ 500.96 $ 500.96 $ 505.00 $ 500.96 $ 500.96 $ 3,248.80 $ 500.96 $ 1,050.40 $ 2,080.60 $ 1,335.54 $ 505.00 $ 17,978.96 $ 593.88 689.28 710.82 1,873.98 538.50 2,757.12 534.19 534.19 538.50 534.19 534.19 3,463.20 534.19 1,120.08 2,225.21 2,225.21 1,421.64 37,027.26 633.28 538.50 17,167.38 538.50 76,139.41 $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 1,750.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ 875.00 $ $ - $ $ 875.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ 875.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ 875.00 15,750.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 2,826.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 11, 304.00 1,413.00 1,413.00 2,826.00 1,413.00 42,390.00 3,102.00 $ 3,201.00 $ 5,468.76 $ 2,640.00 $ 11,286.00 $ 2,640.00 $ 2,640.00 $ 2,640.00 $ 2,640.00 $ 2,640.00 $ 2,640.00 $ 4,237.26 $ 7,005.20 $ 3,986.91 $ 2,970.00 $ 4,397.00 $ 64,134.13 $ 2,162.00 $ 1,311.30 $ 10,198.98 2,231.00 $ 1,353.15 $ 10,450.57 3,811.56 $ 3,536.23 $ 18,735.93 1,840.00 $ 1,004.40 $ 8,809.84 7,866.00 $ 7,786.94 $ 36,857.66 1,840.00 $ 1,004.40 $ 8,807.55 1,840.00 $ 1,004.40 $ 8,807.55 1,840.00 $ 1,004.40 $ 8,815.90 1,840.00 $ 1,004.40 $ 8,807.55 1,840.00 $ 1,004.40 $ 8,807.55 $ $ 9,000.00 1,840.00 $ 1,004.40 $ 8,807.55 2,953.20 $ 11,648.94 7,930.85 $ 21,529.86 7,930.85 $ 11, 569.06 $ 2,678.40 $ 8,875.85 2,523.00 $ 5,357.64 15,120.66 $ 63,451.92 2,070.00 $ 8,555.16 5,971.00 $ 13,699.50 10,350.00 $ 48,604.22 $ 78,947.60 1,840.00 $ 3,791.50 85,640.12 $ 72,301.04 $ 374,333.66 AGENDA ITEM 7L STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Bluebill Ponds Utility and Street Improvements VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote required to close the hearing BACKGROUND: This feasibility report was prepared in response to a petition from the Bluebill Ponds subdivision. This project involves the installation of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and roadways within the proposed subdivision. On October 9, 2000, the City Council received the feasibility report for this project and set a date for a Public Hearing. At the Public Hearing I will present the detailed information contained in the feasibility report. • OPTIONS: 1. Close the public hearing. 2. Continue the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 - Staff recommends closing the public hearing. • AGENDA ITEM 7M • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -112, Order the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Bluebill Ponds Utility and Street Improvements VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: After the Public Hearing for is held, the next step in the Public Improvement Process is to order the improvement and preparation of the plans and specifications. This project was initiated by a petition from the Bluebill Ponds subdivision which is the benefited property proposed to be assessed. The petitioners have also waived 50 days of the 60 day waiting period. Therefore, per Section 8.06 of the City Charter, the City Council may immediately order the proposed project. The plans and specifications will be submitted to the City Council earlier than the Feasibility Report schedule indicates in order to take advantage of the favorable bidding climate for this type of work. Construction will take place in the Spring of 2001. • OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 -112, Order the Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Bluebill Ponds Utility and Street Improvement project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Adopt Resolution No. 00 -112, order the improvement and preparation of plans and specifications for the Bluebill Ponds Utility and Street Improvement project. • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -112 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS — BLUEBILL PONDS UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 9th day of October, 2000, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvement of Bluebill Ponds by constructing sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and streets. WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held earlier this evening, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer, John Powell, is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of November, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on November 13, 2000. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • • • AGENDA ITEM 7N STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 - 113, Approve Final Payment, 1999 Sealcoating Project VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: The contractor for the 1999 Sealcoating, Pearson Bros., Inc., is requesting City approval of Payment No. 3 (final) in the amount of $3,373.92. The original contract amount was $68,242.20 and the final contract amount is $67,478.45. Approval of the final payment will begin the one -year warranty period. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Approve Resolution 00 - 113 approving Payment No. 3 (final) for the 1999 Sealcoating project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution 00 - 113 be approved. Council Member introduced the following resolution and • moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00- 113 RESOLUTION APPROVING PAYMENT NO. 3 (FINAL) FOR THE 1999 SEALCOATING PROJECT WHEREAS, the construction of the 1999 Sealcoating project has been completed by Pearson Bros., Inc. and; WHEREAS, the one -year warranty period for this project will begin with the final payment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Payment number 3 (final) in the amount of $3,373.92 is approved for a total contract amount of $67,478.45. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of November, 2000. • Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on November 13, 2000. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140 PHONE: 651/292-4400 FAX: 651/292 -0083 Comm. No. 12038 -01 Cert. No. 3 (FINAL) St. Paul, MN, September 22 , 20 00 Owner , Contractor To City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota This Certifies that Pearson Bros., Inc. For 1999 Sealcoating Is entitled to Three Thousand Three Hundred Seventy -Three and 92/100 Dollars ($ 3,373.92 being 3rd (FINAL) estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated August 9 , 1999 . Received payment in full of above Certificate. Pearson Bros., Inc. , 20 TOLTZ, JUNG, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINE - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS a C. Wedel, P.E. tember 22, 2000 RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT 0 CONTRACT PLUS EXTRAS PAYMENTS CREDITS Contract price plus extras $ 68,242.20 All previous payments $ 64,104.53 All previous credits Extra No. Change Order No. 1 (Compensating) $ (763.75) II II II II Credit No. If 11 „ „ II It AMOUNT OF THIS CERTThICATE $ 3,373.92 Totals $ 67,478.45 $ 67,478.45 Credit Balance /There will remain unpaid on contract after payment of this Certificate $ - $ 67,478.45 $ 67,478.45 An Equal Opportunity Employer • TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Engineers- Architects - Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS Estimate No. 3 (FINAL) Period Ending Sept. 22, 20 00 Page 1 of 1 Comm. No. 12038 -01 Project 1999 Sealcoating Original Contract Amount Location Lino Lakes, Minnesota $ 68,242.20 Contractor Pearson Bros., Inc. Total Contract Work Completed Total Approved Credits Total Approved Extra Work Completed Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed Total Amount Earned This Estimate $ 0.00 Less Approved Credits $ 0.00 Less 0 % Retained $ 0.00 Less Previous Payments $ 64,104.53 Total Deductions Amount Due This Estimate Contractor Engineer 411111tillr Pea -.n :ros., Inc. son C. Wedel, P.E. $ 67,478.45 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 67,478.45 $ 64,104.53 $ 3,373.92 Date / Zcv1:1 Date // ESTIMATE NO. 3 (FINAL) 1999 SEALCOATING CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA • LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 12038 -01 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS- ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TO DATE PRICE TOTAL 1 MODIFIED FA -2 1/8" TRAP ROCK CHIP 1,240.00 TN 1248.54 2 CRS -2 ASPHALT 24,700.00 GAL 23833.35 • 31.33 $ 39,116.76 1.19 $ 28,361.69 $ 67,478.45 Page 1 • • AGENDA ITEM 70 STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -114, Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract, Main Street Trunk Utilities VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 1:00 p.m. on November 7, 2000. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid S. J. Louis Construction, Inc. $424,899.00 Richard Knutson, Inc. $434,332.22 Northdale Construction $451,382.41 Landwehr Construction, Inc. $466,065.84 MCS $468,150.98 Meadowvale Construction, Inc. $489,550.00 Randy Kramer Excavating, Inc. $499,817.56 Ryan Contracting, Inc. $502,741.05 Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. $510,668.70 S. R. Weidema, Inc. $514,868.29 Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. $528,160.75 Volk Sewer and Water, Inc. $531,362.99 Lametti and Sons, Inc. $569,198.60 Engineer's Estimate $461,929.50 The low bid is approximately 8% below the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy of the complete bid tabulation is attached. The cost of this project will be recovered through trunk assessments to benefiting properties including the Bluebill Ponds subdivision. The completion date for this project is June 30, 2001. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 00 -114, accepting bids and awarding a construction contract to S. J. Louis Construction, Inc. for the Main Street Trunk Utilities project. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 00 -114. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 00 -114. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -114 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — MAIN STREET TRUNK UTILITIES IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the Main Street Trunk Utilities project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Amount of Bid S. J. Louis Construction, Inc. $424,899.00 Richard Knutson, Inc. $434,332.22 Northdale Construction $451,382.41 Landwehr Construction, Inc. $466,065.84 MCS $468,150.98 Meadowvale Construction, Inc. $489,550.00 Randy Kramer Excavating, Inc. $499,817.56 Ryan Contracting, Inc. $502,741.05 Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. $510,668.70 S. R. Weidema, Inc. $514,868.29 Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. $528,160.75 Volk Sewer and Water, Inc. $531,362.99 Lametti and Sons, Inc. $569,198.60 Engineer's Estimate $461,929.50 AND WHEREAS, it appears that S. J. Louis Construction, Inc., is the lowest responsible bidder; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with S. J. Louis Construction, Inc., in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the Main Street Trunk Utilities Improvements according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13'x' day of November, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the • City Council on November 13, 2000. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk IAN STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON - TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE S.J. LOUIS CONSTR. INC. RICHARD KNUTSON INC. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT S S o C°9 n 6903 6 1,225.00 6 36,029.50 6 26,260.50 6 898.80 6 252.70 622.35 981.75 6 832.65 6 19,530.00 6 24,457.00 cgi S CV '4MO S COO cm cce 8 CD O) CO. cm 6 3,280.00 6 1,525.20 657.80 702.00 1 900.00 S 1,203.00 oni 0) '{O c N 49 375.00 6 26,260.50 460.35 6 2,790.30 6 2,223.45 6 35,914.05 6 1,278.45 n �m S n ai 4,249.50 6 287.00 a°o v° a°o_ 1� r 6 146.40 482.00 1 4,257.00 1 85,081.95 1 vs err rr ra rr err err err r7 ea 49 4949 49 w w rs err w w 07 177 n r. 4949 or se 4949 w w. err .r O O C�O `.n 4949err 1,225.00 6 120.50 6 143.50 6 16.05 6 18.05 6 23.05 6 28.05 4.55 O O CCO COO O O C000 6 1,832.30 6 84.00 6 410.00 I 6 6.20 1 6 2.20 87.75 6 5.00 0.60 $ 375.00 $ 143.50 $ 17.05 $ 19.65 $ 12.15 $ 21.57 $ 426.15 $ 601.00 $ 773.75 $ 1,416.50 $ 287.00 $ 6.60 O M C13 CV CO W O 00 CO 49 49 ea r: rr err err 49494949 P.m or P. ea err w r. 15,189.75 450.00 88 0 co an '9 0 CO n 49 6 27,084.00 6 1,736.00 434.00 837.00 6 1,085.00 6 366.00 88p O8 r Co 6 38,750.00 6 12,250.00 6 10,800.00 6 2,486.70 3,520.00 6 2,952.00 6 358.80 6 2,000.00 6 1.80 6 1,162.90 1 192,479.95 888 80� CV 494949 3,408.00 1,830.00 39,960.00 1,440.00 3,250.00 840.00 5,100.00 190.00 3,549.00 493.35 128.00 472.00 2,767.05 91,378.40 re 07 49 ea err r7 err ea o. or s. P. ea r. w 6949 er ea Le vs Pp. Pp. gyp. o. V. w v. 6 15,189.75 6 15.00 6 440.00 6 124.00 8888 4C�1 ;3 ;•43 4949 4949 6 31.00 2.00 64949 Opp pOp t010 4969 6 50.00 6 50.00 6 1,800.00 6 90.00 pe OO r 6 250.00 0.01 0.58 $ 300.00 $ 148.00 $ 21.00 $ 24.00 $ 10.00 $ 24.00 $ 480.00 ps p888 6888 COO, CEO 4 03 OS�r 4696694694949 696 $ 16.00 $ 59.00 $ 1.95 reps re r. r. rr ea r. ea 49 49 err err 4969 r 8 8 49 49x. 2,000.00 32,890.00 23,790.00 1,232.00 350.00 756.00 1,050.00 3,660.00 15,000.00 20,350.00 46,500.00 15,925.001 10,800.00 2,763.00 800.00 2,952.00 2,990.00 400.00 3,600.00 4,010.00 202,268.00 2,000.00 27,450.00 459.00 2,698.00 2,745.00 39,960.00 1,500.00 3,500.00 1,000.00 4,500.00 250.00 3,276.00 2,392.00 480.00 800.00 4,257.00 97,267.00 es r, re re 07 rr 07 rr or ra rr err sr or 49 49 w w 177 re es r. 4949 ra r. 8 8 6 r O 49 49 $ 2,000.00 $ 110.00 $ 130.00 $ 22.00 $ 25.00 $ 28.00 OS °N fO 49 49 $ 50.00 $ 55.00 $ 60.00 I $ 65.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 12.00 $ 10.00 $ 50.00 $ 20.00 $ 2.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 150.00 $ 17.00 $ 19.00 $ 15.00 $ 24.00 $ 500.00 $ 700.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,500.00 r$ 250.00 $ 12.00 $ 8.00 $ 60.00 $ 100.00 $ 3.00 J J W J J J J J J J J J J J W J W J J W U J W J J J J J W W W W 4C 4t W J J W W al O000C00tp r CI OO CD rnS LO 4.- N r r 35.0. 183.0 300.0 OOO CO0C00000 pOO Li) CO NO '9000 8N n N N N r S N 1.0 183.0 27.0 142.0 183.0 1665.0 3.0 000000000 Cq r ri r^6 ac C7 CA N N v CC W 3 W (0 Q G Z Q N MOBLIZATION REMOVE 21" SANITARY SEWER PIPE CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MH JACK/AUGER 12" STEEL CASING PIPE JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING PIPE 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. THROUGH CASING 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) CONSTRUCT 4' DIA. MANHOLE TYPE 301(10' DEPTI- EXTRA DEPTH OF 4' DIA. MH I4" ON 21" PVC, SDR26 WYE BRANCH 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE 14" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE THROUGH CASING 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE CLEANOUT TRENCH STABILIZATION ROCK TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER MAINS SUBTOTAL SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXIST. 12 "DIP WATERMAIN JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING 6 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN THROUGH CASING 12 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX 6" HYDRANT (8' -6" BURY) 6" HYDRANT EXTENSION - FURNISH AND INSTALL 1" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE 1" TYPE "K" COPPER SERVICE THROUGH CASING 1" CORPORATION STOP 1" CURB STOP AND BOX MJDIP FITTINGS SUBTOTAL WATERMAM r N CO I. to CO n CO co O r T N r COV CO ;.2 n °CA NNN r r r r r r r N C0 v Cn C0 n CO CA O NCO V N CO r r r r r BID TABULATION V STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON w TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE S.J. LOUIS CONSTR. INC. RICHARD KNUTSON INC. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT $ 380.00 $ 300.00 $ 600.00 $ 2,110.00 $ 830.00 $ 2,015.75 $ 1,009.40 O� C9 N •49 IS 88 C00.r c 47 r 49 6969 $ 15,295.00 $ 3,034.50 $ 48,982.50 $ 16,507.50 $ 727.50 $ 1,750.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,008.75 $ 2,276.50 $ 1,162.50 $ 24,000.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 131.198.25 CO n OO)0 UD p2p 08CA 0(000) CO r 49494969 $ 434,332.22 $ 4.00 $ 50.00 I$ 6.00 $ 21.10 $ 20.75 $ 36.65 $ 252.35 $ 1.50 $ 5.00 $ 3.00 $ 11.50 $ 8.50 $ 31.50 $ 35.50 $ 1.50 $ 50.00 $ 16.00 $ 3.00 $ 7.25 $ 2.90 $ 1,250.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 0.50 $ 0.25 IN $ 95.00 $ 450.00 $ 100.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 1,200.00 8 O r 49 5,286.00 245.00 714.00 14,630.00 4,998.00 48,205.00 18,135.00 611.10 1,330.00 2,250.00 760.00 3,162.30 2,394.25 1,209.00 24,000.00 116.00 2,100.00 130,145.65 $ 91,378.40 $ 10,895.00 $ 130,145.65 0 COD N 41: 49 449 69 49 49 4, $ 1.00 $ 75.00 $ 1.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 , $ 300.00 N 1.20 7.00 2.00 11.00 14.00 31.00 39.00 1.26 38.00 15.00 1.52 7.62 3.05 1,300.00 i 24,000.00 0.04 0.42 er Ira yr yr es w 69696949 Law 44 n $ 475.00 $ 300.00 8888888 I0) 609449496966966949 r N r r 64 r $ 13,215.00 $ 140.00 $ 1,071.00 $ 15,960.00 $ 2,856.00 $ 51,315.00 $ 16,740.00 $ 727.50 $ 525.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 8,300.00 $ 2,355.00 $ 930.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 725.00 ut 1ff 8 49 $ 97,267.00 $ 12,785.00 $ 150,859.50 0 n. S 49 C C " 8 to 69 $ 34.00 $ 50.00 $ 300.00 $ 500.00 p S S 8 C) C7 49 49 69 12.00 8.00 33.00 36.00 1.50 15.00 15.00 5.00 20.00 3.00 1,000.00 30,000.00 0.25 era �������� w QQ J WJJJJaa CO CO J F. -JF�C7 CO�JUNQ CO U. 95.0 6.0 100.0 100.0 40.0 55.0 4.0 2.0 4405.0 35.0 357.0 1330.0 357.0 1555.0 465.0 485.0 35.0 150.0 500.0 415.0 785.0 0.9 1.0 2900.0 pp0 STORM SEWER REMOVE CULVERTS REMOVE GS APRONS REMOVE STORM PIPE 15" RCP STORM SEWER 15" CMP CULVERT 30" CMP CULVERT 15" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS 30" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER STREETS AND RESTORATION REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER 2350 TYPE LV 2 OR 3 NON WEAR. COURSE 2350 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE CRS -1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK CONCRETE PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 FOR SHOULDERING SILT FENCE TOPSOIL BORROW SODDING SEEDING TRAFFIC CONTROL 4" BROKEN YELLOW LATEX 4" SOLID WHITE LATEX SUBTOTAL STREETS AND RESTORATION WATERMAIN STORM SEWER STREETS AND RESTORATION TOTAL BID r N CO 4 0) 40 n 0 r N CO 4f (0 co N. (0 CA ° :: r r N M wr N 4D N. r BID TABULATION N STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS- ARCHITECTS- PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION NORTHDALE CONSTR. CO. MCS LANDWEHR CONSTR. INC. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 88888° m. o C0 vroonCO O 6!(9 . . co 0 if: Cr)Nr 43 49 Q . 0f CD 49 69 448.00 909.90 6 1,260.00 6 2,745.00 6 15,690.00 6 19,869.00 88 . mI 93? d'N iH�p��w 6 12,000.00 6 2,984.04 6 4,848.00 6 3,665.40 °0 . . .-o 6 3,780.00 6 1,102.75 203,955.79 6 1,340.00 23,790.00 6 4,099.20 6 36,297.00 6 1,644.00 6 3,565.00 900.00 6 5,430.00 321.00 6 3,876.60 6 3,857.10 88 V CO 6 92,792.30 49 es err w err P. P. Q. vs: V. err 444407 w err or P. 07 69 6944 err N 0 .-008 06�88 at0 10 49 43 49 49 8 69 49 6 32.00 33.70 pw 00 o°i� 6 52.30 6 53.70 6 57.60 6 60.60 80 $8 N 6 606.00 6 14.90 6 13.90 6 260.00 6 21.00 6 0.55 $ 1,340.00 $ 130.00 $ 22.40 $ 21.80 $ 548.00 $ 713.00 $ 900.00 $ 1,810.00 $ 321.00 $ 14.20 $ 12.90 0On �8N 49 49 69 rs 07 f9 44 err err err rr 43 49 err err or rr rr rr 8888 gyp. 8. 2 M8a NC) 61 H6►49 28,324.74 1,120.00 88 fob. 8N F3 1,050.00 1 ,830.00 88 8. 8. Oa0O rse 61 34,875.00 11,025:00 12,000.00 3,453.75 4,000.00 2,460.00 2,990.00 1,200.00 2,700.00 1,203.00 195,212.79 1,000.00 28,324.74 405.00 2,840.00 3,660.00 49,950.00 1,500.00 3,500.00 1,000.00 4,500.00 250.00 2,730.00 2,990.00 400.00 800.00 2,128.50 105,978.24 49 err err rr err rr rr err err 49 49 49 69 err err err yr 49 err err 6l or or err rr 69 49 49 H 6 17,562.50 10.00 6 2,000.00 6 131.20 6 154.78 20.00 6 20.00 6 30.00 6 30.00 6 10.00 6 40.00 6 40.00 6 45.00 6 45.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 125.00 $ 500.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 150.00 $ 15.00 $ 0.60 $ 1,000.00 $ 154.78 $ 15.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 30.00 $ 500.00 1 $ 700.00 11 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 250.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 1.50 err err err err rr or or or or or or or or or ' r690 I 888° . .. rn8m25o ,- co 4p9 6! 6! 6! 27,093.15 1,614.48 420.14 849.42 ---`s r 49 49 14,742.00 18,714.60 40,602.25 13,403.95 10,125.36 2,879.32 3,780.56 2,290.26 651.82 1,340.80 1.80 1,162.90 193,686.34 0�� QQ. 250 4 r N 49 49 49 2,507.72 1,926.99 38,278.35 1,488.54 3,306.30 849.20 4,258.11 311.91 2,650.83 774.41 246.08 701.76 4,058.34 89,858.85 err err err rr rr n err or or err rr, err or or rr err rr rr err or rr err err rr rr rr 13,952.50 10.00 6 1,000.00 6 -_- 123.90_ 6 148.05 6 28.83 6 30.01 6 31.46 6 33.26 3.01 6 49.14 6 50.58 6 52.39 6 54.71 1,687.56 104.21 472.57 9.31 2.18 167.60 0.01 0.58 $ 1,000.00 $ 148.05 $ 15.08 $ 17.66 $ 10.53 $ 22.99 $ 496.18 $ 661.26 $ 849.20 $ 1,419.37 $ 311.91 $ 9.71 $ 2.59 $ 30.76 $ 87.72 2.86 6969 w sr err err n or P+ or or or or err err err or or or err or or J J W J J J J J J J J J J J W J W J J W O J W J J a J J J W W W W W J J W W m 1.0 30.0 1.0 299.0 183.0 56.0 14.0 27.0 0 0� N 2 300.0 370.0 775.0 245.0 6 27.6 8.0 246.0 299.0 8.0 180.0 2005.0 1.0 183.0 27.0 142.0 183.0 1665.0 3.0 5.0 1.0 3.01 1.0', 273.0 299.0 8.0 8.0 1419.0 SANITARY SEWER MOBLIZATION REMOVE 21" SANITARY SEWER PIPE CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MH JACK/AUGER 12" STEEL CASING PIPE JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING PIPE 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) 18" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. THROUGH CASING 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 121" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) CONSTRUCT 4' DIA. MANHOLE TYPE 301(10' DEPTI- EXTRA DEPTH OF 4' DIA. MH 4" ON 21" PVC, SDR26 WYE BRANCH 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE THROUGH CASING 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE CLEANOUT TRENCH STABILIZATION ROCK TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER MAINS SUBTOTAL SANITARY SEWER CONNECT TO EXIST. 12 "DIP WATERMAIN JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING 6 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN THROUGH CASING 12 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX 6" HYDRANT (8' -6" BURY) 6" HYDRANT EXTENSION - FURNISH AND INSTALL 1" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE 1" TYPE "K" COPPER SERVICE THROUGH CASING 1" CORPORATION STOP 1" CURB STOP AND BOX MJDIP FITTINGS SUBTOTAL WATERMAIN r N co<1010 r CO WOrN CO 0t0 n0Of NNN N rN CI 0<O h CO O)O •-N C7V 4740 r r BID TABULATION N STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION NORTHDALE CONSTR. CO. MCS LANDWEHR CONSTR. INC. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1 • $ 731.50 $ 612.00 $ 770.00 $ 2,370.00 $ 868.00 $ 1,930.50 $ 1,488.00 $ 2,332.00 8 s r T 4, 888 Gtn m CO 69.69690, : ^s r- 6 13,699.00 6 4,998.00 47,272.00 6 15,600.75 6 606.25 6 1,575.00 6 1,845.00 1,500.00 6 3,008.75 6 2,276.50 8888 N IDsTo � N to cC0 N 6 158,215.75 $ 203,955.79 $ 92,792.30 1 $ 11,102.00 $ 158,215.75 vt La ID CO a 4, 0, 0, vs] vs. 0, 0, 0, 0,r, 694,6969 $ 7.70 $ 102.00 1$ 7.70 $ 23.70 $ 21.70 $ 35.10 00 nCDtL CD W r 4969 0000)00 69 C 4,4,4,4, $ 30.40 $ 33.55 $ 1.25 $ 45.00 $ 12.30 $ 3.00 $ 7.25 $ 2.90 88 �Q N ` .= N ID 69 69 $ 0.04 $ 0.40 • •• • • •r• • • • • 80 8 p ppp8p p Ch '- N 1pp,4,4949ppCp $ 800.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,300.00 8 8 it? N r 49 8,810.00 350.00 1,071.00 14,044.80 4,641.00 48,453.80 182.70 2,614.50 1,000.00 6,225.00 2,355.00 6 1,116.00 6 44,075.00 p pp o CD No ('.1 . 6 154,359.95 $ 195,212.79 $ 105,978.24 $ 12,600.00I $ 154,359.95 001 - CD S a M 4,449494 en vs vs vs vs vs vs 4949 $ 10.00 $ 500.00 $ 10.00 $ 25.00 00 p0p p0p NC07tON m CD 49 49 49 49 2.00 10.00 3.00 6 10.56 6 13.00 6 31.16 5.22 17.43 2.00 6 15.00 3.00 1,200.00 6 44,075.00 0.21 0.44 4,4,69690, w 0, 0, 0, 0, w w 0, w 0, 0, $ 712.50 $ 450.06 $ 750.00 $ 2,219.00 $ 807.20 $ 1,848.00 $ 1,165.56 $ 2,215.16 O .- 11,012.50 175.00 1,428.00 14,616.70 5,062.26 49,635.60 b CI CD .- 6 1,323.00 6 2,098.50 6 1,000.00 6 3,320.00 2,394.25 6 1,220.63 45,150.00 6 116.00 6 2,100.00 A pp P tO 4, $ 193,686.34 $ 89,858.85 $ 10,167.48 $ 157,669.74 $ 451,382.41 690 0, o, 40 40 e, n o, v, e, a, vs o, o, 0, $ 7.50 $ 75.01 $ 7.50 $ 22.19 $ 20.18 $ 33.60 $ 291.39 $ 1,107.58 $ 2.50 $ 5.00 $ 4.00 $ 10.99 $ 14.18 $ 31.92 $ 35.23 $ 1.31 $ 37.80 $ 13.99 $ 2.00 $ 8.00 $ 3.051 $ 1,312.50 $ 45,150.00 $ 0.04 $ 0.42 J W J J J J a W CC y J J F6 y J V N Q J J J 0 O p O Op 004 0 00 40.0 55.0 4.0 2.0 4405.0 35.0 357.0 1330.0 357.0 1555.0 465.0 485.0 35.0 150.0 500.0 415.0 785.0 0'I 6'0 O Op §O 8 N N STORM SEWER REMOVE CULVERTS REMOVE GS APRONS REMOVE STORM PIPE 15" RCP STORM SEWER 15" CMP CULVERT 30" CMP CULVERT 15" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS 30" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER STREETS AND RESTORATION REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER 2350 TYPE LV 2 OR 3 NON WEAR. COURSE 2350 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE CRS -1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK CONCRETE PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 FOR SHOULDERING SILT FENCE TOPSOIL BORROW SODDING SEEDING TRAFFIC CONTROL 4" BROKEN YELLOW LATEX 4" SOLID WHITE LATEX SUBTOTAL STREETS AND RESTORATION SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM SEWER STREETS AND RESTORATION TOTAL BID r N CI a tD CD P CO r N C7 a ID CO P co Of 0 '' V N,., a in c BID TABULATION R,RfN STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MEADOWVALE CONSTR. INC. RANDY KRAMER EXC. INC. RYAN CONTRACTING CO. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT I 13,500.00 i 600.00 5,000.00 38,870.00 27,816.00 2,464.00 616.00 1,188.00 �S 6 19,800.00 6 24,420.00 6 51,150.00 6 16,170.00 00'00Z' l $ 00'S6b' l $ 00'SLO'E $ 00'009'E $ 00'E9L'l $ $ 1,102.75 $ 229,884.75 88888 Oa0 toN 44444944." t0"t N $ 2,196.00 $ 42,624.00 $ 1,275.00 $ 2,875.00 $ 775.00 a 6 3,276.00 6 1,495.00 6 400.00 6 800.00 6 3,831.30 6 100,288.30 44 4449ww- 49444444 -- 888 ONOO C7 T 444444ww6444wwww444) p8 O $ 152.00 $ 44.00 $ 44.00 $ 44.00 $ 44.00 $ 5.00 $ 66.00 $ 66.00 $ 66.00 $ 66.00 T -00N0 T 1$ 5,000.00 li $ 152.00 88 C7N 4444 I $ 12.00 $ 25.60 $ 425.00 $ 575.00 $ 775.00 $ 12.00 $ 5.00 $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 2.70 __ — $ 24,900.26 $ 402.00 $ 1,409.22 $ 40,236.43 $ 28,844.46 $ 2,199.68 $ 616.28 $ 1,357.83 $ 2,064.30 $ 358.68 $ 11,004.00 0 N80N)C)CCDWOO CNCpp N 0 q.'" .-c`)OCOTCO�@9 44 44 44 44 $ 3,338.53 $ 4,222.56 $ 3,360.36 $ 346.84 $ 3,101.60 $ 3,583.8011 $ 1,122.80 $ 212,790.15 799.54 6 28,844.46 6 1,090.80 6 5,800.70 6 1,954.44 6 48,767.85 6 1,619.46 6 3,569.55 974.46 6 5,044.53 335.55 3,502.59 496.34 1,034.88 887.60 4,782.03 109,504.78 wwww ,w PN.w �.wwww4 $ 24,900.26 $ 13.40 $ 1,409.22 $ 134.57 $ 157.62 $ 39.28 $ 44.02 $ 50.29 $ 58.98 $ 1.96 $ 36.68 $ 40.71 $ 48.31 $ 67.97 $ 1,860.82 $ 120.83 $ 527.82 $ 13.66 $ 1.16 $ 387.70 $ 19.91 $ 0.56 l c% T� n 4449 $ 40.40 $ 40.85 $ 10.68 $ 29.29 C�p..n 00 0) OV C!) m�neo WnrnCo r 44444464 $ 335.55 $ 12.83 COO. 0) can 0) TNOM T 44444444 4. $88§8 8888888 —.0 N 6 600.00 29,900.00 i 27,450.00 6 2,240.00 560.00 6 1,350.00 6 1,750.00 6 4,575.00 6 17,400.00 22,200.00 50,375.00 17,150.00 9,000.00 2,763.00 4,000.00 4,920.00 4,485.00 800.00 2,700.00 2,005.00 231,823.00 $ 500.00 $ 27,450.00 $ 810.00 $ 4,970.00 $ 4,575.00 $ 46,620.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 900.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 300.00 $ 2,730.00 $ 2,990.00 $ 240.00 $ 800.00 $ 2,838.00 $ 104,973.00 44444M4 44444444pwwwwwP .o.wwop.44444- erw, -..w. 48808488 °Nc.Si 0 N 44444444444444444www $ 600.00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 $ 40.00 $ 40.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 25.00 $ 58.00 $ 60.00 $ 65.00 $ 70.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 100.00 $ 500.00 $ 20.00 $ 15.00 $ 100.00 $ 500.00 $ 150.00 li $ 30.00 $ 35.00 $ 25.00 $ 28.00 $ 500.00 �8888S8 T 44 64 44 44 49 49 49 J J J J J J J 4Q W J J J J J J W J W J J W 0 J 4J J J J J W W W aaW J J W W J OOOOO rNrNC'O 1.0 299.0 183.0 56.0 14.0 27.0 35.0 183.0 300.0 370.0 775.0 245.0 6.0 27.6 8.0 246.0 j 299.0 8.0 0 8 N 1.01 183.0 27.0 142.0 183.0 1665.0 3.0 5.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 273.0 299.0 8.0 8.0 1419.0 SANITARY SEWER MOBLIZATION REMOVE 21" SANITARY SEWER PIPE CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MH JACK/AUGER 12" STEEL CASING PIPE JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING PIPE 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. THROUGH CASING 21' PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 21' PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 21' PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) CONSTRUCT 4' DIA. MANHOLE TYPE 301(10' DEPTH EXTRA DEPTH OF 4' DIA. MH 4" ON 21" PVC, SDR26 WYE BRANCH 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE THROUGH CASING 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE CLEANOUT TRENCH STABILIZATION ROCK TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER MAINS SUBTOTAL SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXIST. 12 "DIP WATERMAIN JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING 6 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN THROUGH CASING 12 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 6' RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX 6" HYDRANT (8' -6" BURY) 6" HYDRANT EXTENSION - FURNISH AND INSTALL 1 " TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE 1 " TYPE "K" COPPER SERVICE THROUGH CASING 1" CORPORATION STOP 1" CURB STOP AND BOX MJDIP FITTINGS SUBTOTAL WATERMAIN TNM V co CO f` 00 0) O T N C7 a 1000 t` 000) N N N T N 0,t 0000N m 0) O T N • C+) It CO CO BID TABULATION A + N STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MEADOWVALE CONSTR. INC. RANDY KRAMER EXC. INC. RYAN CONTRACTING CO. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 8888 cbCO r 4 9 449 499 C9 449 00'SLh'O1. $ 00'001.'1. $ 00'001.'1. $ 00'SZ6' l $ 6 8,810.00 6 525.00 714.00 6 14,497.00 6 4,284.00_, 48,205.0C CI, 6 15,670.50 727.50 6 1,680.00 88 ^� N 6 2,905.00 6 2,355.00 6 2,325.00 6 54,000.00 888. �gS r a 4. 69 fRN $ 100,288.30 $ 10,475.00 $ 162,093.00 $ 502,741.05 69 nnnnnnnn 4949 - 07 8 8 8 OgOg 494949 8 49 $ 35.00 $ 275.00 $ 550.00 2.00 6 15.00 2.00 6 10.90 6 12.00 6 31.00 6 33.70 1.50 6 48.00 6 14.50 1.70 p�pn 8 8 8 8 1,688 O N q 1 4949 0.30 0.30 49 n nP.r.Ira n n n n n 49 49 nn $ 398.05 $ 150.78 $ 970.00 $ 2,753.00 $ 626.00 $ 1,334.85 $ 948.76 $ 1,094.78 $ 8,276.22 6 16,386.60 6 1,248.10 6 2,245.53 6 13,020.70 6 4,348.26 47,272.00 6 17,581.65 591.70 6 1,016.75 6 1,690.50 1,525.00 6 3,054.40 6 2,307.90 6 1,179.94 6 53,611.38 8 OO a � �4na r O N N of to 49 49 N $ 109,504.78 $ 8,276.22 $ 169,246.41 CO IS)) n Co 0) 0) a 49 69 n n n n n cot nn aa* n n n 4949 $ 4.19 $ 25.13 $ 9.70 $ 27.53 $ 15.65 $ 24.27 $ 237.19 $ 547.39 COD Nnr- CON CG CO 49 49 49 Oi CV r 49 49 $ 30.40 37.81 $ 1.22 $ 29.05 $ 11.27 $ 3.05 $ 7.36 $ 2.94 $ 1,268.75 $ 53,611.38 $ 0.04 $ 0.41 $ 475.00 $ 180.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 720.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 9,025.00 4,405.00 175.00 6 1,428.00 15,960.00 7,140.00 54,425.00 18,600.00 970.00 1,050.00 1,800.00 1,000.00 4,150.00 3,140.00 1,116.00 25,000.00 870.00 2,500.00 143,729.00 $ 104,973.00 $ 9,025.00 $ 143,729.00 44 CO cri co of 49 err en r. P. 4949 4949 4949 N $ 5.00 $ 30.00 $ 10.00 $ 28.00 $ 18.00 $ 30.00 $ 250.00 $ 600.00 pp pn pn 8 8 8 rN V 49 4949 12.00 20.00 35.00 40.00 2.00 30.00 12.00 2.00 10.00 4.00 1,200.00 25,000.00 0.30 0.50 4949 nn n n n as 49 69 49 49 nn JaJJJJW W N(A JF JFF()y F J6 JJJ 95.0 6.0 100.0 100.0 40.0 55.0 4.0 2.0 4405.0 35.0 357.0 1330.0 357.0 1555.0 465.0 485.0 35.0 150.0. 500.0 415.0 785.0 0.9 1.0 2900.0 5000.0. STORM SEWER REMOVE CULVERTS REMOVE GS APRONS REMOVE STORM PIPE 15" RCP STORM SEWER 15" CMP CULVERT 30" CMP CULVERT 15" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS 30" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER STREETS AND RESTORATION REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER 2350 TYPE LV 2 OR 3 NON WEAR. COURSE 2350 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE CRS -1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK CONCRETE PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 FOR SHOULDERING SILT FENCE TOPSOIL BORROW SODDING SEEDING TRAFFIC CONTROL 4" BROKEN YELLOW LATEX 4" SOLID WHITE LATEX SUBTOTAL STREETS AND RESTORATION SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM SEWER STREETS AND RESTORATION TOTAL BID r N CO y r D - LO 00 r N C7 n of V, CO t. 00)C) rrrer unOr- r BID TABULATION STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION BARBAROSSA & SONS INC S.R. WEIDEMA INC. LAMETTI & SONS INC ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 888p8 S NBN O), CO 69 49 $ 5,000.00 $ 43,355.00 $ 30,744.00 $ 2.464.00 p88 180�f 'M U) 6949 770.00 6 549.00 188 iS W INN 05 cc; 4949 6 34,100.00 10.780.00 •8a °O �80Sn • NOW io CV r OS .4:' t• 6 448.50 i 2.000.00 .8n SO Nr '�t` r 277,727.65 88888`888. S .-O 49 V �OOWi PU)� M 4949 ,— MNC'�N 6949494A $ 53,280.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 4.750.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 5,550.00 $ 335.00 $ 6,825.00 $ 598.00 X88 O IN CO 0 .4969 $ 2,554.20 $ 116,530.20 or we et 49 49 49 49 x. es 49 69 $ 76,000.00 $ 25.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 145.00 $ 168.00 $ 44.00 $ 22.00 $ 22.00 $ 22.00 $ 3.00 $ 44.00 $ 44.00 $ 44.00 $ 44.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 80.00 8 0 8 N M 4949 $ 1.50 $ 250.00 $ 40.00 $ 0.55 BS § 496969 SS (O 0�p O N $ 24.00 $ 12.00 $ 32.00 $ 750.00 $ 950.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 335.00 $ 25.00 $ 2.00 SSW NSA 49 4949 $ 20,692.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,110.00 $ 35,581.00 $ 26.095.80 () l 826. $ 1,674.000 0 $ 2,310.00 $ 4,611.60 $ 23,400.00 $ 29,655.50 $ 64,325.00 $ 21,266.00 $ 10,350.00 $ 2,372.04 $ 4,584.00 $ 2,004.90 $ 3,827.20 $ 2,000.00 a°qn T O 6949 $ 261,469.59 472.00 88 p M C at N 49 49 6 2,627.00 6 3,385.50 6 40,959.00 6 1,435.05 6 3,480.00 88 6 u S Ch 2,252.25 i 3,812.25 88 8 c O) M i 3,476.55 96,674.60 ea ea o. e. a-r 49 49 es w 4949 asw 80088 0Na-W 0 I- N 69 69 69 69 6 55.00 88 (WO CCOO 69 69 66.00 25.20 6 78.00 6 80.15 6 83.00 6 86.80 6 1,725.00 6 85.85 573.00 8.15 p COO8 NQ TuN 0.01 0.55 8 N 49 $ 142.00 $ 16.00 $ 18.50 $ 18.50 $ 24.60 $ 478.35 $ 696.00 $ 940.00 $ 1,610.00 $ 315.00 $ 8.25 $ 12.75 $ 120.00 $ 164.00 CV 69 an an an o. e. 49 P. an ea es 69 69 as as '�- 6 16,300.00 150.00 6 1,500.00 6 44,850.00 6 32,940.00 6 1,680.00 6 420.00 810.00 6 1,050.00 6 5,490.00 6 18,000.00 6 22,200.00 6 46,500.00 6 14,700.00 6 9,600.00 6 2,486.70 6 3,200.00 3,690.00 i 4,485.00 400.00 2,160.00 i 1,203.00 i 233,814.70 8 8 pN U) II) O N 69 CO 69 6 3,124.00 6 4,026.00 6 58,275.00 6 1,500.00 6 3,000.00 6 800.00 I 6 4,500.00 250.00 8 888 8p 0 4 .- 66020 V O) T 69 69 69 69 69 49 an an ...... ..... e. 69 69 as - w w o7 o. e. 07 69 69 or es 8888p 68p68p88888 8 WOt()600)0)C0�)04M (O (`OOH 494949 49494949 49 4949 6 60.00 6 60.00 8888 600(00000) . 69696949 6 400.00 6 15.00 6 15.00 i 50.00 i 12.00 0.60 8888 8(0004 6949 49 $ 22.00 $ 22.00 5808 a u)) 000 49 4949 $ 800.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 250.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 20.00 $ 80.00 $ 2.00 or 7. as an 49 4949 49 J y lb LL lb LL LL LL LL LL lb lb LL LL LL Q LL4 Q LL LL Q U ' LL LL LL LL LL LL W Q Q W Q LL LL Q Q m 1.0 30.0 1.0 299.0 183.0 56.0 14.0 27.0 35.0 183.0 300.0 370.0 775.0 245.0 6.0 27.6 0 t 0 0 0 p 0 0 co 4g co 8 W NN S N 1.0 183.0 27.0 142.0 183.0 1665.0 3.0 5.0 0 0 0 �-CI.- 273.0 299.0 8.0 8.0 1419.0 SANITARY SEWER MOBLIZATION REMOVE 21" SANITARY SEWER PIPE CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MH JACK/AUGER 12" STEEL CASING PIPE JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING PIPE 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. THROUGH CASING 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) CONSTRUCT 4' DIA. MANHOLE TYPE 301(10' DEPTH EXTRA DEPTH OF 4' DIA. MH 4" ON 21" PVC, SDR26 WYE BRANCH 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE THROUGH CASING 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE CLEANOUT TRENCH STABILIZATION ROCK TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER MAINS SUBTOTAL SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXIST. 12 "DIP WATERMAIN JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING 6 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN THROUGH CASING 12 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX 6" HYDRANT (8' -6" BURY) 6" HYDRANT EXTENSION - FURNISH AND INSTALL 1" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE 1" TYPE "K" COPPER SERVICE THROUGH CASING 1" CORPORATION STOP 1" CURB STOP AND BOX MJDIP FITTINGS SUBTOTAL WATERMAIN a- N M et 0 CO t` co O);2 r N 0 ;_r ;12 f� r a) C3' N NN rNM et U)Wn co co ,c27. CM r;LI. La MI BID TABULATION N STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION BARBAROSSA & SONS INC S.R. WEIDEMA INC. LAMETTI & SONS INC ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT $ 1,140.00 8888 8888 T C7 49 49 49 r 49 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,300.001 $ 15,430.00 8888 N88o r 4349 r 10 49 49 $ 5,355.00 $ 47,427.50 $ 15,624.00 $ 606.25 $ 1,050.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,320.00 $ 2,747.50 $ 2.790.00 8881 08ou�r) U) 496449 N DI N r 49 $ 277.727.65 $ 116,530.20 $ 15,430.00 n 0 D) U) r 49 6°0 co DI CO N 49 S 49 $ 150.00 $ 12.00 $ 32.00 I$ 35.00 $ 78.00 $ 250.00 $ 1,150.00 882 ei 4949 8 C4T 49 49 6 15.00 6 30.50 $ 33.60 $ 1.25 $ 30.00 $ 14.00 $ 2.00 $ 8.00 $ 3.50 $ 3,000.00 Ui d' Ci ... $ 589.00 $ 300.00 $ 1,315.00 $ 2290.00 $ 800.00 $ 1,773.75 $ 952.00 $ 2,020.00 $ 10,039.75 °vt._u, R 49 227.50 6 1,374.45 6 12,435.50 6 4,998.00 6 47,427.50 IL O � CO 1,800.00 1,500.00 6 3,008.75 6 2,276.50 1,162.50 '-OO C7 N�p tt V r 49 49 H $ 261,469.59 (DIDl-. �I00 Ui0 a) 49 49 $ 146,684.35I $ 514,868.29 es es es vs 4949 vs P. 494949 4949 0 co 49 $ 50.00 $ 13.15 $ 22.90 $ 20.00 I$ 32.25 $ 238.00 C O 49 $ 1.68 $ 6.50 CCDCI CO O) te69 $ 14.00 $ 30.50 $ 34.50 $ 1.35 $ 12.00 $ 3.00 $ 7.25 $ 2.90 $ 1,250.00 $ 43,000.00 $ 0.04 $ 0.40 88888 NC)CD W O Nr 49 4949 4949 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,200.00 1 $ 9,795.00 p 1006 8 8888 W.r1. f00)N CO Ter 0 49 694949 49 49 15,810.00 970.00 6 1,800.00 6 1,500.00 3,112.50 6 2,355.00 > 1,209.00 SO 08888 0UJ0 O4 N4 r 49 49 4949 $ 233,814.70 888 c6 O� 0)0)ID r r 49 49 49 Ire co i0 O N 49 es e: es es ea ea es ea $ 6.00 $ 50.00 $ 6.00 $ 28.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 $ 350.00 $ 600.00 $ 1.50 $ 5.00 $ 2.00 $ 11.00 $ 14.00 $ 32.00 $ 34.00 $ 2.00 $ 12.00 $ 3.00 $ 7.50 $ 3.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 0.20 $ 0.45 LL LL Q LLLL JJ 6 J J6(a ti; ?JU (AQ JJ J 95.0 6.0 100.0 100.0 40.0 55.0 4.0 2.0 4405.0 35.0, 357.0 1330.0 357.0 1555.0 465.0 485.0 150.0 500.0 415.0 785.0 0.9 1.0 2900.0 5000.0 STORM SEWER REMOVE CULVERTS REMOVE GS APRONS REMOVE STORM PIPE 15" RCP STORM SEWER 15" CMP CULVERT 30" CMP CULVERT 15" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS 30" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER, STREETS AND RESTORATION REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER 2350 TYPE LV 2 OR 3 NON WEAR. COURSE 2350 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE CRS -1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK AGGREGATE BASE CLASS. 5 FOR SHOULDERING SILT FENCE TOPSOIL BORROW SODDING SEEDING TRAFFIC CONTROL 4" BROKEN YELLOW LATEX 4" SOLID WHITE LATEX SUBTOTAL STREETS AND RESTORATION SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM SEWER STREETS AND RESTORATION TOTAL BID /-NCO a 10 CO f` CO r N CO et N 00 r 00 CA O r N O) Q U) ID � BID TABULATION MAIN STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 "DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION DAVE PERKINS CONT. INC. VOLK SEWER & WATER INC ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT I.. 4949 49 .111 049 49 49 4949 91..1.91DO411. 49 4949 4969 49 49 49 49 49 4949 IA N 116111111S. 49 49 49 49 49 49 69 69 49 9.111. 49 41 49 69 69 49 49 49 I 3,900.00 750.00 I 2,650.00 37,375.00 I 28,365.00 I 1,120.00 294.00 675.00 980.00 6 3,660.00 17,100.00 6 21,830.00 6 47,662.50 6 15,680.00 6 15,000.00 6 2,763.00 6 5,160.00 6 3,690.00 6 4,485.00 800.00 6 4,183.20 6 1,162.90 400 N CA N 49 p8p to 49 I 28,365.00 621.00 6 3,550.00 6 4,575.00 80pl�80 O)IO 4 r 6 3,295.001, 6 1,000.00 8800080 8NO28N 1.6 a `7 I- 3,476.55 I 113,447.55 sr: sr 177 err 49 49 err P. 494949 49 49 49 err err or or wr wwerr err P.m err err err err err err err n 07 err 07 err err I 3,900.00 I 25.00 2,650.00 I 125.00 I 155.00 I 20.00 6 21.00 6 25.00 6 28.00 6 20.00 6 57.00 6 59.00 6 61.50 64.00 888 88 N 6 645.00 l 6 15.00 88 r8 6 23.24 0.58 $ 550.00 $ 155.00 $ 23.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 30.00 $ 500.00 $ 659.00 $ 1,000.001 88 849 •' 49 49 $ 15.00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 49 49 werr 494907 n err err err err err 49 49 err err 49 49 nn -re- 8,000.00 750.00 30,500.00 37,375.00 27,450.00 1,400.00 378.00 6 756.00 1,050.00 2,745.00 17,400.00 21,830.00 46,500.00 15,190.00 8,400.00 2,763.00 5,200.00 4,428.00 8o8p8� 000) gg 8 Nr C+ )r 49 4949 49 241,048.75 $ 1,500.00 $ 27,450.00 $ 945.00 $ 5,396.00 $ 2,745.00 $ 52,447.50 {I $ 1,500.00_1 $ 3,250.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 450.001, $ 3,276.001 $ 1,495.00 1 $ 280.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 4,257.00 $ 111,391.50 4.9 4 sr err sr 07 err 07 err 4949 4949sr err err err 888888 8C8491!)49 Cn r C O m 4949 49 49 4949 27.00 28.00 30.00 15.00 58.00 59.00 60.00 62.00 1,400.00 100.00 00'81. 00'099 888g" .-U),- 49 4949 49 88888 0Lt)C�`)CC).- 1n r r 49 69 69 49 49 1 $ 31.50 $ 500.00 $ 650.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 450.00 $ 12.00 $ 5.00 $ 35.00 $ 150.00 $ 3.00 err P. err err err n err err nn err err CO LL Q LL LL LL J J W J J J LL LL J J LL LL LL LL LL LL < LL J J J J J J W J < LL W J LL < >- LL J W O J Q LL LL LL LL W J J J J LL Q J W Q Q Q Q LL W lllill W W J LL Q Q J W W Cp J 1.0 30.0 1.0 299.0 183.0 56.0 14.01 27.0 35.0 183.0 300.0 370.0 775.0 245.0 6.0 27.6 8.0 246.0 299.0 8.0 180.0 2005.0 1.0 183.0 27.0 142.0 183.0 0000 tCp u,.- — CO 299.0 8.0 8.0 0 a SANITARY SEWER MOBLIZATION REMOVE 21' SANITARY SEWER PIPE CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MH JACK/AUGER 12" STEEL CASING PIPE JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING PIPE 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) 8" PVC, SDR 35 SAN. SEW. THROUGH CASING 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) 21" PVC, SDR 26 SAN. SEW. (16' -18' DEEP) CONSTRUCT 4' DIA. MANHOLE TYPE 301(10' DEPTH 1 EXTRA DEPTH OF 4' DIA. MH 4" ON 21" PVC, SDR26 WYE BRANCH 14" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE PIPE THROUGH CASING 4" PVC, SCH40 SERVICE CLEANOUT TRENCH STABILIZATION ROCK TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER MAINS SUBTOTAL SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXIST. 12 "DIP WATERMAIN JACK/AUGER 18" STEEL CASING 6 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 8 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN THROUGH CASING 12 "DIP CLASS 52 WATERMAIN 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE AND BOX 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX 6" HYDRANT (8' -6" BURY) 6" HYDRANT EXTENSION - FURNISH AND INSTALL 1" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE 1" TYPE "K" COPPER SERVICE THROUGH CASING 1" CORPORATION STOP 1" CURB STOP AND BOX MJDIP FITTINGS SUBTOTAL WATERMAIN rNm NCO n CO to OT NT CO CO r r N CO r r O)NNN r r N m a CO ,_° ,_CM CO N. CO m r_ m a r r ,_1° CO r BID TABULATION MAIN STREET TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS- PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12100 -02 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 11/7/00 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION DAVE PERKINS CONT. INC. VOLK SEWER & WATER INC ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 111011.11 496949696963636349 111101111111111111 69 69696969694949 69696949696969496949 . N 8 �g 6969 $ 12.00 I $ 1,200.00 $ 25.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 16.00 $ 640.00 $ 33.00 $ 1,815.00 $ 300.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 550.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 9,705.00 13,215.00 175.00 1,071.00 $ 18,753.00 $ 5,062.26 $ 49,635.60 $ 11,731.95 88 OC $ 1,800.00 $ 1,575.00 6 3,158.15 6 2,394.25 $ 1,220.63 $ 48,150.00 $ 6,090.00 $ 22,600.00 $ 188,924.84 $ 219,285.60 $ 188,924.84 $ 531,362.99 4949 0008 eLi 69 69 69 6 14.10 14.18 31.92 6 25.23 2.00 37.80 9 6 12.00 6 3.15 w w 600 ■ o 69 69 6 1,312.50 6 48,150.00 6 2.10 4.52 88 °8888 6969 v. P. et w ter err eft P. Q. p8p888p8p p8 00)8066) r M 49496969 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 500.00 $ 300.00 $ 9,600.00 6 13,215.00 6 175.00 6 1,785.00 6 14,630.00 6 4,998.00 54,425.00 6 17,205.00 6 1,455.00 6 1,400.00 6 1,800.00 6 1,250.00 8888 p888 n��N�N C7 •-4- q 49 69 63 69 49 N tD 69 N $ 241,048.75 $ 166,120.50 $ 528,160.75 449 w w V.J. Ve o. P+ w, o-+ n $ 10.00 $ 25.00 $ 10.00 $ 35.00 8080 Nog g 49 49 49 69 $ 3.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 11.00 $ 14.00 $ 35.00 $ 37.00 88888tt)88 MO N V 69494!49 ::28: O)'J00C C5 to �j 4- C� et 69 49 CO 69 63 CD 49 J W J J JJ6Q y 63 J?J F H gN F J 8(OQ19 JJ 0000 8 0 8 8 40.0 55.0 4.0 2.0 4405.0 35.0 357.0 1330.0 357.0 1555.0 465.0 000.00 W 8 0 8 415.0 785.0 0.9 1.0 2900.0 CD 5R as 119 STORM SEWER REMOVE CULVERTS REMOVE GS APRONS REMOVE STORM PIPE 15" RCP STORM SEWER 15" CMP CULVERT 30" CMP CULVERT 15" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS 30" GS APRONS W/ TRASH GUARDS SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER STREETS AND RESTORATION 'REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 1B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER 2350 TYPE LV 2 OR 3 NON WEAR. COURSE 2350 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE CRS -1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK CONCRETE PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 FOR SHOULDERING SILT FENCE TOPSOIL BORROW SODDING SEEDING TRAFFIC CONTROL 4" BROKEN YELLOW LATEX 4" SOLID WHITE LATEX SUBTOTAL STREETS AND RESTORATION SANITARY SEWER STREETS AND RESTORATION 1 TOTAL BID �N 00 et 121 CO P. 00 4- C4 00 et an 406`40060 '' N 47 10404` BID TABULATION • • AGENDA ITEM 7P STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 13, 2000 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -115, Approve Easement Grant to the Metropolitan Council for the Centerville Interceptor Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Easements are required along the west side of Elmcrest Avenue for the installation of the Centerville Interceptor by the Metropolitan Council. This easement would be located on a small portion of the property that the City recently acquired from Lino Lakes, LLC. The proposed settlement from the Met Council's attorney has been reviewed by the City's Attorney who recommends approval as shown on the attached correspondence. The estimated $20,387.56 payment from the Met Council should be placed in the Surface Water Management Fund. This fund was used to purchase the underlying property from Lino Lakes, LLC. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Not approve Resolution No. 00 -115. 3. Approve Resolution No. 00 -115, approving the Easement Grant to the Metropolitan Council for the Centerville Interceptor project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Resolution No. 00 -115 be adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -115 RESOLUTION GRANTING EASEMENT TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR THE CENTERVILLE INTERCEPTOR IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, easements are needed to construct the Centerville Interceptor improvements; and, WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes and the Metropolitan Council agree to the terms contained in the latter's letter dated October 25, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Attorney is directed to proceed with the transaction proposed in the October 25, 2000 letter from the Metropolitan Council. 2. The funds from this transaction will be deposited in the City's Surface Water Management Fund. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of November, 2000. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on November 13, 2000. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • • • • LAW OFFICES OF William G. Hawkins and Associates Legal Assistant WILLIAM G. HAWKINS TAMMI J. UVEGES BARRY A. SULLIVAN October 31, 2000 John Powell Lino Lakes City Engineer Lino Lakes City Hall 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Metropolitan Interceptor Project Dear John: 2140 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 PHONE (763) 427 -8877 FAX (763) 421 -4213 E -MAIL HawkLawl@aol.com RECEIVED Nov 0 2 2000 c rn- o "r�',.: LAKES Enclosed please find a letter from the attorney representing the Metropolitan Council concerning their eminent domain proceeding over part of the property the City acquired from the Lino Lakes, LLC. I have reviewed their calculations and believe they appear to be reasonable for an underground utility easement. The discounting of the property could be argued as well as the rate of return on the temporary easement, however, it would appear in view of the dollar amounts involved and the attorneys fees to contest this eminent domain the most prudent course economically would be to accept the settlement. Would you please present this to the City Council for their review and approval. If you have any questions, please contact me. William G. Hawkins WGH /tju Enclosure } Robert L Cmshv Leonard M. Addington N. Walter Graff Allen D. Barnard Richard A. Peterson Robert J. Christianson. Jr. Frank J. \Lalz Frank Vogl Marinas W Van Patten. Jr. John A. Burton. Jr. James C. Diracles Thomas B. Heffelfinger Robert L. Meller. Jr. Morris E. Knopf Judith A. Rogosheske Scott D. Eller Charles C. Berquist E. Joseph LaFaye Gregory D. Soule Cathy E. Gorlin ck B. Hennessy do A. Sullivan niel R.W. Nelson David J. Zuhke Steven R. Kruger Paul E. Kaminski Boss C. Forme!' Caren S. Glover Mary E. Shearer Barbara M. Ross Catherine J. Courtney Jeannice M Reading Sarah Crippen Madison Robert D. Maher Christopher D. Johnson Michael H. Pink Jill B. Laorr Daniel A. Kaplan Robert M. Lewis Jeanette 0. Roegge Denise M. Brunson Cynthia 1,. Hegarty Marlene A. Peterson Michelle Bergholz Frazier Brian \\: Kensieki David C. Murphy OF COUNSEL Ward B. Lewis Archibald Spencer Robert M. Skare John R. Carroll Janes I). Olson Scott 1'. Moen Janes 1. Best 1!AC.i%6 Robert J. Flanagan as.197.t LADED 1926 BEST & FLANAGAN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4000 US Bank Place 601 Secrnd Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -4331 Telephore 612 339 7121 Facsimil.: 612 339 5897 www.beszlaw.com William Hawkins, Esq. William Hawkins and Associates 2140 4th Avenue North Anoka, MN 55303 Re: ivleiropoiitan Council Interceptor Project Your client: City of Lino Lakes Dear Mr. Hawkins: Writer's Direct Dial No.: (612) 341-9722 E -Mail Address:bross @bestlaw.com October 25, 2000 RECEIVED NOV 0 2 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES I am writing to propose a settlement offer with respect to the condemnation by the Metropolitan Council of property that is now owned by the City of Lino Lakes. The property is being condemned for the Centerville Interceptor project. The total amount of the settlement offer is $20,387.56. This is based on the price the City paid of $1.25 per square foot for fee title to the property, discounted 75% for permanent easement area that is located within the tract of land, and 50% for the permanent easement area that is located within the current Elmcrest Road. The appraiser did appropriate a value to the property within the roadway due to the likelihood that the roadway will be vacated. The temporary easement area is also calculated at $1.25 a square foot with a rental value of 8% for two years. The calculations are as follows: Permanent Easement: 6,186 square feet of property within tract excluding roadway at $1.25 /square foot 13,935 square feet of property within roadway at $1.25 /square foot Temporary Easement: X 75% = $5,799.38 X 50% = $8,709.38 29,394 square feet at $1.25 = $36,742.50 X 8% = $2,939.40 for 2 years = $5,878.80 Total = $20,387.56 Please review this offer with your client and if acceptable we can proceed with drafting and executing a Stipulation. If the case can be resolved all parties should enter Mr. William Hawkins October 25, 2000 Page 2 • into one Stipulation with an Award executed by the commissioners. The Award would be filed and after the 40 day appeal period the additional funds not deposited with the Court would be paid. A motion will be necessary for the release of funds that have been deposited. I look forward to your response and the resolution of this matter. BMR/lhc cc: LuAnne Major 14326- 200017/127853 • • Sincerely, cgxa-ouz, co.() Barbara M. Ross CITY OF LINO LAKES • z 0 0 0 0 U o o 0. A c.,potsl Y 1 g Sbsso :l# .00a }uuwaso3 Aunn �p a-1}S }uauowJad N • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES DATE : August 14, 2000 TIME STARTED : 6:38 P.M. TIME ENDED : 8:40 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson MEMBERS ABSENT : None Staff members present: City Administrator, Linda Waite Smith; Administration Director, Dan Tesch (part); City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; City Engineer, John Powell; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; City Planner, Jeff Smyser; Economic Development Assistant, Mary Divine(part); Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia (part); Fire Chief, Milo Bennett (part); Finance Director, Al Rolek (part); and Public Services Director, Rick DeGardner SETTING THE AGENDA Item 10A, Discussion of Council Calendar, was added to The agenda was approved as amended. • CONSENT AGENDA The City Administrator advised the Jun - �0, ouncil work session minutes were previously removed from the consent agenda for Council Member Dahl moved t ®. Rr: the Consent Agenda, as presented. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. n c ied unanimously. ITEM MINUTES: July 19, 2000, Council Work Session July 24, 2000, Council Meeting DISBURSEMENTS: ACTION August 14, 2000 (Check No. 59513 - 59656, $310,831.16) Approved Approved Approved July Manual Disbursements • ($10,774.05) Approved COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 Centennial Fire District Consider Approving Amended Fee Schedule Resolution No. 00 — 39A Resolution No. 00 — 76, Accepting Donation Of Two Cellular Phones for Use by the Lino Lakes Police Department Approve Election Judges List Consider Sandburr Days Event Application, 3.2 Beer Permit, Cabaret Licenses for Circle -Lex Lions on September 8,9,10, 2000 & Resolution No.00 -74 OPEN MIKE Approved Approved Approved Approved Steve Garske, Introduction of Par — Aide Company : 68 President of Par — Aid Company, came forward and d stated the company is a 45- year -old manufacturi September 2000. He introduced himself and st within the City. ake Road — Mr. Steve Garske, a 2000 catalog of their products. He any t at will be relocating to Lino Lakes in leased that the company will be located American Legion (Andy Neal/Patti :, e" ecognize an Outstanding Lino Lakes Teen — Mr. Andy Neal, resident and former C em r, came forward and thanked everyone for what they have done for the American Le Ms. Patti Coleman, Presi w - nt of t dies Auxiliary, came forward and stated she picks two (2) young ladies every year to . � Girls State. She introduced Ms. Jennifer Wong, Governor of the 2000 Minnesota Girls State Ms. Wong came forward and stated Girls State is a wonderful program that would not be possible without the American Legion. She gave an overview of the Girls State Program and the week she spent there. She stated the program taught her not to take freedom for granted and to honor those who have fought for that freedom. She stated the program also encouraged those in attendance to get involved in government. She stated the program was beneficial to all that were involved. Update on Twilight Acres — The City Administrator advised staff met with 11 residents last week regarding Twilight Acres. The discussion included the following options that need to be explored relating to failing septics: 1. Another survey to determine the level of the resident's willingness to pay for this project. 2 • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 2. Placing the project on the ballot this fall for consideration. 3. Making a specific funding request to an agency other than the City. 4. Modifying the project to include alternative means of providing utility service. The City Administrator advised staff will explore the above options and another meeting will be held. Staff is recommending the public hearing be continued to the August 28, 2000, Council meeting. Mr. Lyle Bye, 775 Vicky Lane, came forward and thanked staff for working with the residents regarding this issue. Mr. Raymond Johnson, 7971 Nancy Drive, came forward and stated he will refrain from making comments until August 28, 2000. Mr. John Hudgens, 6661 Pelican Place, came forward and stated h a d at the previous Council meeting about the time frame regarding the County's turn back rior ghway 49. He requested an update from Council. The City Engineer advised that question must be answT ed �.. the +unty. He stated he has left a message for the County Engineer regarding this issu • Mr. Hudgens inquired about the format of the s • Mayor Bergeson advised the purpose of discuss the project. The meeting wil for resident input. Council Memb The meeting is open to the pub The City Engineer referr funds. ncil work session relating to this issue. etingiss for Council Members to get an update and public hearing. There will be other opportunities no ad any additional discussion regarding the project. ns to Mr. John Olson, County Engineer, regarding the turn back Mayor Bergeson directed st to contact the County Engineer again regarding the turn back funds. Ms. Arlene Aberbach, 7855 Lake Drive, came forward and expressed concern regarding her neighbor losing a tree to oak wilt. She stated she has many mature trees close to the dead tree. The City Forester visited the site and suggested curdling the trees. She stated she called a consultant and the consultant stated curdling is not an option. The consultant injected the trees. The City of Ham Lake is paying for the trenching of trees and possibly the partial cost of injecting trees to help this problem. She stated the City Forester did not even mention injections. She stated it is possible she would have lost three (3) trees. She stated she wants the property trenched this fall or at least five big Oak trees will die. She asked the City to take a proactive look at this problem. Mayor Bergeson directed staff to investigate and follow up with Ms. Aberbach regarding this issue. COUNCIL MINUTES No one else was present for open mike. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH AUGUST 14, 2000 Consider Hiring Les Rydeen as Full -time City Mechanic (3/5 Vote Required), Dan Tesch — Staff advised the last day of work for Randy Meyer, the City Mechanic, was August 4, 2000. The City was fortunate enough to have had Les Rydeen working along side Mr. Meyer for the past several months in a seasonal capacity. When asked about continuing with the City in a full -time capacity, Mr. Rydeen accepted. Mr. Rydeen has been doing a great job as mechanic, and comes highly recommended by the Public Works Superintendent. This offer is contingent upon a physical exam, and pre - employment drug test and will take effect August 16, 2000. Council Member Carlson moved to extend a conditional offer of employment to Les Rydeen, contingent upon a physical exam and pre - employment drug test. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 2001 Commission and Media Center Budgets (3/5 Vote Re the proposed 2001 Budgets for both the North Central Metro ( "Commission ") and the North Metro Media Center ( "Me esch — Staff referred to ications Commission The Commission's operating budget for 2001 is prop 272,478. This is an increase of $59,433 over the 2000 budget. The increases are primari follo ing areas: 1. Digital equipment acquisitio it provement. 2. Legal and consulting bill d franc ising and renewal process. 3. Lobbying activities de . - • ', c • • at legislation that could prove devastating to local franchising authori The Media Center proposed • or x'11 is proposed at $509,280. This includes a recommendation from th Operat °t ommittee (city administrator /staff member from each member city) that the subscriber's :_ G fee be increased from $2.25 /month to $2.30 /month. The increase is necessary for th edia Center to meet marketing, staffing and equipment goals over the next five -(5) years. The City will be receiving approximately $27,500.00 in franchise fees in 2001. Council Member Carlson moved to approve the budgets as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK 1999 Audit Report, Ron Hedberg — Mr. Hedberg, LarsonAllen, came forward and stated the audit report was reviewed in detail at the last Council work session. He stated he will give a brief overview of the audit. 4 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 Mr. Hedberg advised there were two (2) findings in the report: bids were not being retained on file and bids were not being advertised in the legal newspaper. Mr. Hedberg briefly reviewed the information regarding the summary of the Town Center Funds, fund balance compared to the fund balance for the past ten years, and the summary of debt service. Council Member Carlson stated the breaking point for the Town Center in 1998 was $4.68 per square foot. She stated it is currently $6.09 noting a small portion is interest. She asked if that was repayment for a loan. Mr. Hedberg advised the loan was not included in the 1998 break -even point. He stated he believes that is the only loan. The money was paid back to the water and sewer fund. Council Member Carlson moved to accept the Audit Reports as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCIi SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 11— 00, Open Bur — Staff advised it has been many years since the Open Bu Lakes. The proposed ordinance replaces the present ord. the present ordinance. Items such as the burnin the new ordinance. Required), Milo Bennett ce has been updated in Lino d go'- s into more detail and definition than s or grass clippings are still prohibited under It also has a time of day limitation fo � = _o ires. These fires can only exit after 11:00 a.m. and before 3:00 a.m. There is a provision in this o 's ° e for fee for a burning permit. The actual fee to be set by City Council resolution. Both Centerville and Circl me have adopted the ordinance that is being proposed. Staff explained the definition of a recreation fire noting a recreational fire does not need a burning permit. Council Member Dahl moved to approve SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 11 — 00, as presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Council Member Carlson voted yea. Council Member Dahl voted yea. Council Member O'Donnell voted yea. Council Member Reinert voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 11 — 00 can be found in the City Clerk's office. COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 12 — 00, Adopting the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code (3/5 • Vote Required), Milo Bennett — Staff advised every 3 -4 years, the State of Minnesota adopts an updated Uniform Fire Code. When the state adopts this code, it becomes the fire code to be used throughout the state. By adopting the same code, it gives the local fire inspectors the authority to enforce the code when doing their inspections. This has proven to be very beneficial in reducing the fire losses and the adoption of this code is standard practice in a large number of communities. Council Member Reinert moved to approve SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 12 — 00, as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Council Member Carlson voted yea. Council Member Dahl voted yea. Council Member O'Donnell voted yea. Council Member Reinert voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Motion carried unanimously. The City Attorney advised the ordinance will go into effect 3 daft blication. Ordinance No. 12 — 00 can be found in the City Clerk' offi tee. Consider Resolution No. 2000 — 75, Accepting "° °ion from Centennial Fire Relief Association, Chief Pecchia — Staff advised the enten Fire District has graciously donated $1,332.00 to offset the cost to match funds} or a t t• purchase a total of six (6) Tire Deflation devices. The Lino Lakes Police Depart t r - ceive • a grant to purchase three (3) sets of Tire Deflation devices. Part of the grant r en to provide matching funds. Centennial Fire District is aware of this goal and h " o x9 ted :x ,332.00 for the cost of the matching funds. The purpose of Resolution N 11 — 7 his to accept and publicly thank the Centennial Fire District for their generous donati Mayor Bergeson inquired a k• Police Department has chan d its police pursuit policy to comply with current legislation. ut ny liability issues with the use of these devices. Staff advised the The City Administrator asked for clarification regarding uniforms. Staff advised the resolution is correct regarding the issue of uniforms. Council Member Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 2000 — 75, as presented. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 2000 — 75 can be found in the City Clerk's office. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER There was no Public Services Department report. 6 • • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, BRIAN WESSEL PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution No. 00 — 64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions, John Powell — Staff advised the public hearing for this item is continued from the July 24, 2000, City Council meeting. Many residents made statements and asked questions about the proposed assessment amounts, the Public Improvement process (Statute 429), and the City Charter. Specific information from the City Attorney and Charter Commission was requested in order to clarify the 60 -day waiting period status. City staff has received and distributed opinions from both the City Attorney and the Chair of the Charter Commission regarding this issue. A resident also indicated he had contacted the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and received assurance there were funds available for this type of project. City staff again contacted both of these agencies and the Minnesota Department of Health regarding grant funding availability specifically to help pay assessments for connectio City utilities. Staff was unable to identify alternative funding sources. Many of the fundin ourc elate to replacement of on -site systems, low interest loans, or have income restrictions. The first meeting of the Twilight Acres Work Group reg Thursday evening, August 10, 2000, with several resid -nts, Engineer. The group specifically asked that the follo 1. Another survey to determine the project. 2. Placing the project on 3. Making a specify 4. Modifyin: he is systems was held last Administrator, and City es be considered: e resident's willingness to pay for this fall for consideration. request to an agency other than the City. o include alternative means of providing utility service. Staff will need time to inve gat these issues and report to the City Council. Staff recommended continuing the public hearin '. t least until the August 28, 2000, Council meeting. Council Member Reinert asked if City staff had contacted the individuals that residents indicated they had spoken to about funding. Staff advised they contacted two individuals that Mr. Bye had indicated he spoke with. Two representatives from the Minnesota Pollution Agency and the Department of Health were also contacted. There is funding available for failing septics. There is no funding to help pay for assessments for connection to City utilities. Council Member O'Donnell moved to continue PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution No. 00 — 64, Adopt Assessment Roll, Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions, to the August 28, 2000, Council meeting. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. • Staff inquired about any Council objections regarding the steps staff will take explore further options. 7 COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 Mayor Bergeson advised the steps staff has outlined are appropriate. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING, Main Street Trunk Utilities, John Powell — Staff advised on July 24, 2000, the City Council received the feasibility report for this project and set a date for a Public Hearing. In order to allow additional time for discussion of the project schedule with the developer of Bluebill Ponds and notification, staff is recommending the hearing be continued to August 28, 2000. Council Member Reinert moved to continue PUBLIC HEARING, Main Street Trunk Utilities to August 28, 2000. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. FIRST READING, PUBLIC HEARING, Ordinance No. 13 — 00, Vacating Elmcrest Avenue from 400 feet south of Main Street to Cedar Street, John Powell — Staff advised the developer of the Wenzel Farm project in the City of Hugo has requested the vacati the City of Lino Lakes' portion of the Elmcrest Avenue right -of -way. This roadway is als • P nown . 24`h Avenue and Tart Lake Road. The purpose of the vacation is to allow the develo rate this area into their landscaping and trail plan and provide a buffer between the r ideal �' elopment in Hugo and the commercial development in Lino Lakes. The only access of concern to Lino Lakes in the prop Training Facility driveway. For this reason, the south of the driveway. City staff has determine for public purposes, however, the City doe vacated area. tion area is the Construction Laborer's beg "`s 400 feet south of Main Street, and use of this area for a roadway is not needed a drainage and utility easement over the Section 12.05 of the City Charter r- tha al property of the City cannot be disposed of except by Ordinance. The Ordinance . " re two (2) readings, publication, and a waiting period before it is in effect. The publicatio of o ur until the replacement north/south roadway has been constructed in Hugo. Mayor Bergeson opened th.ub is hearing at 7:38 p.m. Ms. Karen Cunningham, 2310 Cedar Street, came forward and stated she lives close to the roadway and has horse stables. She expressed concern regarding how the traffic will be rerouted. She stated there are many new homes that will be going in. There are many people who own horses in the area. She asked if horse trails could be developed in the neighborhood. She stated that currently, there are a lot of large trucks going past her house. She asked how that will change. She asked how Cedar fits with Elmcrest being taken away. Staff referred to a map pointing out the location of the proposed roadway. The trails and single family homes are part of the development going on in Hugo. • 8 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 Council Member Reinert asked for clarification regarding the location of the vacated roadway. Staff referred to a map noting the location is partially in Hugo. Hugo has vacated their portion contingent upon a new roadway. Mayor Bergeson asked if the trail is in Lino Lakes. Staff advised the trail is in both Lino Lakes and Hugo. The Public Services Director advised the proposed trail is a typical pedestrian trail. There have been no discussions relating to horse trails because there is no land conducive to that type of trail. Horse trails can be presented to the Park Board for discussion. Mr. Dan Woodburn, 2247 Arthur Court, came forward and stated a year ago there were discussions regarding connecting the commercial traffic. The discussion included the possibility of a north/south road to County Road 14. He asked if there are plans for Hugo to extend the western exit for commercial traffic. Staff advised the road connection is centered around Main Stree was a proposal to improve the roadway up to Cedar Street. Council Member Carlson stated the option that Hugo i . pur edge of the industrial site and not carrying traffic acr goes through a residential area. Mr. Woodburn asked if there are plans to b t. ed.. Staff advised the improvement of Cedar has been delayed 2 -3 years because the • • litan ouncil is going to construct an interceptor in that area. posed roadway. There studying that possibility. o go across 61 along the northern • Traffic should be calmer because it Mr. Woodburn stated when co He asked if they will be repla has been a lot of digging ; that a ti was done in that area the property markers were taken out aff vised they will research the property markers noting there Council Member Dahl mo to close the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motio carried unanimously. Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 13 — 00, as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Council Member Carlson voted yea. Council Member Dahl voted yea. Council Member O'Donnell voted yea. Council Member Reinert voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for Marmon/Keystone, Mary Alice Divine — Staff advised earlier this evening the Economic Development Authority held a public hearing regarding a proposed $322,242 business subsidy in the form of Tax Increment Financing to Marmon/Keystone for COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 the construction of an 83,000 square foot facility in the Apollo Business Center. A new state statue requires that a public entity- in this case EDA- must find that the granting of a subsidy meets the best • interests of the City. As required by state statue, the City Council is required to also approved the subsidy. This subsidy is to write down a portion of the cost of land and assessments on the project according to the terms of a development agreement. The development agreement includes the Subsidy Agreement, specifying the requirements under the Business Subsidy Law, including wage and job goals and annual reporting. Council Member Dahl moved to approve the business subsidy for Marmon/Keystone, as presented. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for Twin City Fab, Staff advised earlier this evening the Economic Development Authori $77,185 business subsidy in the form of Tax Increment Financing construction of a 19,200 square foot facility in the Apollo Busi .s agenda item, state statue requires that a public entity -in this c of a subsidy meets the best interests of the City. The City subsidy. Inc., Mary Alice Divine — onsidered a proposed ity Fab, Inc. for the As with the previous must find that the granting quired to also approve the The main component of this subsidy is to write d e cos '. f assessments. The development agreement includes the Subsidy Agreement, spe 'fying e requirements under the Business Subsidy • Law, including wage and job goals and ann r in Council Member Reinert moved to as presented. Council Member 0' Town Center Development advised the Planning and oni Development standards in input. The Economic Dev ! p discussion of the proposed s the hearing on August 9, 2000. a� �v:eu :' siness Subsidy Agreement for Twin City Fab, Inc., se ded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. rds s ndorsement (3/5 Vote Required), Jeff Smyser — Staff ng 13 . d opened the public hearing on the new Town Center - 100. It was kept open to allow extensive discussion and public m nt Advisory Committee (EDAC) met on August 3, 2000, for further dards and voted on a recommendation. Planning and Zoning closed The public hearing and discussion has been for educational purposes: to educate the public about the City's intent to create the new zoning district and standards, and to educate City staff and officials on what developers, land owners, and other think about the draft standards. Staff has not yet begun the formal process for amending the zoning ordinance and rezoning the Town Center area. The City has applied for additional grant money from the Metropolitan Council under the Livable Communities program. The City received a grant in 1998 to plan the Town Center. The City has applied for additional money to help implement the plan. The Met Council has let the City know that the development standards are important to show the City is serious about implementing the mixed ei use, compact development plan. While the City has yet to process the formal zoning amendment that 10 COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 is needed to officially adopt any new zoning district or standards, we need to show substantial progress. EDAC voted to adopt a statement indicating support for the standards. The Planning and Zoning Board voted 6 -0 to adopt the statement with two (2) minor changes, which are underlined: Endorse the preliminary and draft Town Center standards as recommended by staff with the understanding that the City may revise specific language and requirements in the standards. (The signage standards (section 3.8) will be temporarily pulled from the standards for further review). Revisions would occur as part of the process for amending the City's zoning ordinance to include standards for a new Town Center zoning district. As noted above, the City will have to process the Town Center standards as an amendment to the zoning ordinance. There will be two elements to this zoning amendment: • One element is the rezoning of the Town Center area. Our tent h been to rezone the areas currently zoned SC Shopping Center and LB Limited B e (A zoning is an amendment Y PP g �'� g to the zoning ordinance, because the zoning map is p o ance. • The other element is the development standard for ne istrict. Every zoning district has its own subsection in the zoning ordinance the s standards for that district. The Town Center standards we've been discussing e su`section for the Town Center zoning district. State statute as well as the City's zonin nce regulate how to process a zoning amendment. Approval of a zoning amendment re • " '` e • to of the City Council. The two -(2) earliest possible s e a listed below. Staff intends to schedule the hearing for the September 2000, Planning an ' g Beard meeting. Staff plans to finish refining the Town Center standards in time for that meeting: Latest date to send notice To newspaper August 23 September 20 Mail notice to property owner's flexible flexible Notice published in newspaper August 29 September 26 Public hearing at P & Z September 13 October 11 City Council action September 25 October 23 Council Member Carlson requested a map of the Town Center. She read the first element to the zoning amendment and asked if staff is still talking about rezoning the Village and the north/east and south/east quadrant. Staff advised at this point staff is still talking about rezoning those areas. • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 Council Member Carlson asked if the same standards will apply through the north/east and south/east quadrants. Staff advised at this point the same standards will apply. Council Member Dahl stated the Town Center standards received from the Planning and Zoning Board and the copy she received in her Council packer are different. Staff indicated repeatedly at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting that the language can be revised. She asked if the City is allowed to change the mixed use or compact development plan or just the language. She asked how far the changes can go. Staff advised the purpose of the Town Center itself has always been a mixed use compact area. Staff defined the term mixed use. Council Member Dahl asked if that can be changed if the Council or staff feels it should. Staff has indicated the zoning can be changed. She asked if the City is restricted in changing the zoning. Staff advised the reason behind the Town Center is to change it to se. If the City decides not to do so, there is no Town Center and the area will be left as Mayor Bergeson stated there are a lot of details to fill in r : tip o th oncept plan. The motion does give a lot of flexibility to work on the details. The City Administrator asked if the Council has to residential, commercial and industrial use. S Staff reviewed the changes that have been flexible. ity to change the mix of development relating ed to the land use plan as it stands now. icular amounts of uses in the plan are Council Member Carlson asked if ! an #ing in the standards that can't be changed. Staff advised the City Council can c oning ordinance as they see fit. Nothing is being locked in at this point. Details of the st s w`.e discussed in much further detail and formally adopted by the City Council. Council Member Reinert sgested the endorsement be continued to allow time for further review. The Planning and Zoning B.:i d is not looking at it until September 2000. He stated the best practice is for the Council to pass something that doesn't need to be changes. Mayor Bergeson stated the changes that are being discussed are details in the Design Standards. The motion is only an endorsement of the concept of having design standards. He stated that he does not believe continuing will change anything because the details have not yet been discussed. Council Member O'Donnell inquired about any risk of the grant if an endorsement is delayed. The Economic Development Assistant stated the reason the standards were put on this agenda is because an agreement is needed from the Council as soon as possible. The final grant application is due September 11, 2000. The issue at stake is whether or not this Council endorses the idea and concepts of the Town Center. 12 • • • • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 Council Member Carlson stated a lot of work has been put into the document by staff and the Planning and Zoning Board. She stated she has remaining issues that she would like to discuss at the next Council work session. Council Member Reinert moved to continue Town Center Development Standards Endorsement to the August 28, 2000, Council meeting. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Council Member Carlson expressed the following concerns regarding the standards: 1. Putting standards on property the City does not own. The City has been negotiating with property owners for the past 2 -1/2 years. She stated she would like to hear from the property owners again regarding their opinion of the standards. The area has prime commercial property and the application showed 18.3 acres of housing on that property. The grant money of $1.5 million sounds like a lot o put a lot of money into the project. She stated s w grant will be enough to leverage the project. Sift st taxpayers. However, the City has is on financing and if the does not want to go to the 3. Extending Apollo as an "L" and putti on 77"' Street needs more discussion relating to traffic hours. 4. Having a service station foo s a o +n A :llo Drive. There is a service station food store already in the City t n h been ere and invested a lot of money. The established business w a disadvantage. Mayor Bergeson stated that all R Sul Member Carson's concerns need to be considered but are not part of this motion. The ost ways has proposed zoning for property it does not own. Motion carried with May ' ""sh<, o voting no. Final Plat, Clearwater Cre 4th Addition (revised) (3/5 Vote Required), Jeff Smyser — Staff advised the City Council approved the final plat for Clearwater Creek 4th Addition on July 24, 2000. There is a revision to that final plat. The revision is necessary because of the grade elevations on one lot where an existing home sits. With the creation of new lots, the driveway location must change for this existing house. This change in driveway location necessitates a change to the lot line. This in turn requires moving the lot lines for five (5) other lots. This situation affects Lots 1 -6, Block 3. Staff referred to a drawing showing those lots on the July 24, 2000, plat, the revised August 8, 2000, plat, and a comparison of the two (2). The table below lists the changes COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 Lot number 5 4 3 2 1 Lot width July 25 final plat 78.90 75.00 75.00 119.00 lot depth 153.00 Lot width, revised August 8 final plat 75.23 75.00 75.00 85.00 lot depth 162.00 Change -3.67 0 0 -34.00 +9.00 The project is a planned development overlay, and included variations on the standard minimum lot widths. The final plat approved on July 24, 2000, conformed to the approved preliminary plat. On the August revision, the width of Lot 5 decreases slightly. Lot 2 width decreases by 34 feet, but the lot is still wider than the normal minimum 80 ft. for an R -a lot, and the building area within the setbacks is adequate. The size of the wetland and the drainage easement around it on Lo significantly from the July 24 plat. The developer's engineer sa but the new August plat shows the correct size of the wetlan the Rice Creek Watershed District. The submitted info 10 location shown on the revised final plat. has decreased the July 24 plat was inaccurate, Rik that was approved by the post- development wetland As on the July 24 final plat, there are three (3) lo sour east corner of this 4th Addition that cross the boundary of the current MUSA. (Lots 4, 15, , °6, Block 5.) These lots must be included in the final plat in order to construct the roads d 'ties n that vicinity. Until MUSA is available, these lots will not receive building pe his res riction is included in the development agreement. All aspects of the phasing plan Council Member O'Don ell state purchase agreements. Sta lots. The realtor was corne? ed velopment apply to the revised final plat. ff indicated there are one or more lots that have sold or have they are not sure if these lots are in this addition or in the larger out making the closing dates. Council Member Carlson moved to approve Final Plat, Clearwater Creek 4th Addition (revised), as presented. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS Discussion of Council Calendar — Council Member O'Donnell asked for confirmation regarding the Comprehensive Plan meeting on Thursday, August 17, 2000, 8:30 a.m. Council Member Carlson advised she has requested the meeting be changed back to a budget work session for personal reasons. 14 • COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 Mayor Bergeson advised a request has been made to hold the budget meeting on Thursday, August 17, 2000, due to the possible absence of a Council Member. The City Administrator advised a meeting has been scheduled Monday, August 21, 2000, 5:30 p.m., to discuss requests for changes to the land use plan. She stated staff may not have time to prepare for the budget meeting on Thursday. Staff will make a recommendation and fax all Council Members. Mayor Bergeson directed staff to schedule a budget work session Thursday, August 17, 2000, 8:30 a.m., noting the possibility of cancellation. COMMUNITY CALENDAR AUGUST 15 THROUGH AUGUST 28, 2000: City Council Budget Work Session, Thursday, August 17, 2000, 8:30 a.m., Centennial Fire Station #2 Council Work Session to Discuss Requests for Changes to the _ : nd Plan, Monday, August 21, 2000, 5:30 p.m. Council Work Session, Wednesday, August 23, 2000, 5 City Council Meeting, Monday, August 28, 2000, 6 • ADJOURN • There being no further business, Counci Dahl moved to adjourn at 8:40 p.m. Council Member Carlson seconded the motio ied unanimously. These minutes were considered ved at the regular Council Meeting, September 11, 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC Cit Transcribed by: Kim Points TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 15 Jaen Bergeson, Mayor • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES : August 23, 2000 . 5.37 p.m. . 9:20 p.m. : Council Member Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson : None Staff members present: City Administrator, Linda Waite Smith; Cit Engineer, John Powell; City Planner, Jeff Smyser, Community Development D. rian Wessel; Economic Development Assistant, Mary Divine; Planning Cg• ator, ary Kay Wyland (part); and Public Services Director, Rick DeGar AENON PLACE POND LEVEL, JOHN POWEL Staff distributed and reviewed a memo regard' advised in order to provide a pond water lev the City would have to place about 900,000 assumes no absorption into the groun $1,500. Assuming 274 gallons per houses for one year. The RCW the district are down. Staff r n Place pond level. Staff ent with the resident's expectations, water in the pond. This estimate s, the value of this water is about , this amount would serve nine (9) d that the ground water levels throughout nded the City not add water to this pond. Staff added if the City is goi o add water, summer or late summer is the best time to do it because of ground eve The City could put a small amount of water into the ground to see if it hold ester. Staff advised it is probable that some water absorption will occur. Mayor Bergeson stated that it is really unclear as to why the water level is down. If there are no environmental concerns, placing a small amount of water in the pond as a test would be appropriate. Council Member O'Donnell inquired about the amount of weeds and cattails in the pond. He asked if the pond will be usable for skating in the winter. Staff advised the Environmental Specialist has indicated the plant life in the pond is not dying off. Staff noted it is unclear whether or not a small amount of water will allow for a smooth skating surface in the winter. A resident from the audience stated the neighbors have discussed mowing the area if the City fills the pond. It was noted that an estimate of $500 was received to fill the pond. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 Staff advised the City can add a small amount of water within the next two -(2) weeks. The City has a certain amount of water it uses to flood rinks. The water would be taken from that fund. Staff recommended adding 300,000 gallons of water as a test to see if the pond will hold the water. Council directed staff to proceed with putting approximately 300,000 gallons of water in the pond as a test to see if the pond will hold water. The filling of the pond is a result of correcting a problem from de- watering due to construction in the area. 6316 HODGSON ROAD WATER CONNECTION, JOHN POWELL Staff distributed a map indicating the property in question. This issue involves construction of a new home. The property owner is building a house on a lot where there was an existing home and well. The property owner assumed he could use the existing well. There is a trunk water main that runs through the lot. Howes -, , the house is set way back forcing utility service from Hodgson Road. Staff recd en sd allowing the property owner to use the existing well The well has been t d i n working condition. Council Member Dahl inquired about the size of th lot: Sta wised the lot is 650 x 100. Council Member Reinert asked where the e The property owner advised the exis Council directed staff to proce existing well. TOWN CENTER UPDAT , ? RY ALICE DIVINEBRIAN WESSEL e is located on the lot. was approximately 50 feet from the road. ng the property owner to hook up to the The Community Devels'me 't Director advised that over the next six -(6) weeks several issues will be discussed - °garding the Town Center. Staff reviewed the background of the Town Center project noting the similarities between the north and south quadrant. One of the common issues between the two -(2) quadrants involves traffic. The Economic Development Assistant clarified the use of TIF for redevelopment. Council Member Carlson stated that she thought that one of three parcels owned by Rehbein would fall under Highway Commercial and is being requested for a zoning change. The plan also shows it as a possible gas station/food store. The idea of tax abatement money has also been discussed. The Community Development Director advised tax abatement is not part of the City's incentive at this time. Staff noted all current plans for the Town Center are concept plans. 2 • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 The City Planner advised a request has not been received for a zoning change to that property. The property is located at one of the sites that need clarification. Staff explained the Highway Commercial designation. The Community Development Director advised there is the possibility of mitigation on the northern quadrant. There is a purchase agreement for this property. The closing date is later this fall. There is a question of access to the parcel. A closed meeting has been scheduled on Monday before the regular Council meeting regarding this issue. There has not yet been a definitive plan. A definitive plan is expected in the next six -(6) weeks. The Economic Development Assistant reviewed the two -(2) concept plans for the Village noting the differences. She stated the Village has always been intended to be more of a neighborhood, pedestrian friendly area. The Community Development Director reviewed the land owners Village area. Staff advised the City has the opportunity to purs Livable Communities. The Council needs to indicate their c and design standards. Staff referred to a map pointing o relating to infrastructure. Staff noted the grant would what is needed to complete the infrastructure. volved with the t from the o the concept t would fund ately one -half of Council Member Carlson asked if there will ing o 40 acres. Staff advised that is unknown at this point, however, 40 acres of ousin as presented. The design standards will also apply to housing. TRAIL CONCERN — 6601 LAO Mr. Patronick, 6601 LaCas " orward and stated he moved into the development last year He discovered . , ail 1 be placed adjacent to his home. He expressed the following conce regar he trail: 1. Lack of tifi ation 2. Undesire s s y neighbors 3. No strategic significance 4. Safety 5. Grading Staff referred to a map showing the line between Clearwater Creek 2nd and 3rd. This particular block is longer than the ordinance allows, which is why the trail was platted. The Public Services Director stated the trail came about in July 1998. Staff indicated they are interest in what Mr. Quigley has to say about the trail. Approval for the project was based on developing a trail on that property due to the long block. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 Council Member Carlson inquired what the City hopes to accomplish by developing the trail. Staff advised the trail will be for pedestrian access. The trail is not a trail connection to the major trail loop or a park. Council Member O'Donnell clarified that the trail is a City trail and was required to meet the ordinance. Staff added the whole plat is a PDO. The block is 200 feet longer than a normal block. When the second addition was platted, the developer did not own the property. When the third addition came through it was deteimined that the block was too long. The City owns the land. The developer must grade the trails. Council Member O'Donnell inquired about the main objections to the trail. Mr. Patronick advised his main objection is privacy. He stated he would not have bought the lot if he had known the trail would be placed there. The trail also has a steep incline that raises safety issues. The trail does not tie into the main trail to He added that the house is approximately 15 -20 feet from the trail. The Public Services Director stated the City has the optio development or vacate the trail. Staff recommended t standpoint, it has been very clear that the trail woul be not an important trail connection. with the trail e trail. From a City d there. Staff noted it is Council directed staff to contact Mr. Quigle for comment. Council will consider the request to vacate the trail. This item will appear on the Coup s ion agenda Wednesday, September 6, 2000, 5:20 p.m. TOWN CENTER DESI S AN ARDS, JEFF SMYSER Staff advised this item Council endorsement o Town Center. uation of the discussion at the last Council meeting. esign standards would show support for the concepts in the Council Member Dahl asked if the Metropolitan Council has indicated to the City that an endorsement is needed. The Economic Development Assistant reviewed the process for the application of the Livable Communities grant noting there are two (2) phases. Phase 2 will be much more detailed and include a presentation. The Advisory Committee wants to know that the concepts can be implemented. The Committee has not seen the design standards. Council Member Dahl asked if the grant is contingent upon mixed use or the amount of multiple housing within the Town Center. 4 • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 The City Planner advised the grant does depend on more than single family housing. The grant does not depend on the amount of housing. The boundaries of the land uses can be changed. The plan calls for a minimum of 10 units per acre and a maximum of 30 units per acre. Council Member O'Donnell clarified that the Metropolitan Council is looking for an endorsement of the vision. The way to do that is to endorse the design standards. The City is not endorsing any particular development plan or details of the plan. Council Member Reinert clarified that prior to endorsement of the standards, the design standards can be changed. Council Member Carlson inquired about the time frame regarding completion of the final draft. The City Planner advised the Metropolitan Council has not given a cut off date. The City is coming dangerously close to the cut off. Council Member Carlson expressed concern regarding com Teti: "• f t "` final draft. A lot of work has been put into the design standards but it n a `; g time. She asked if any action has been taken regarding the concerns sh ex • sed the last Council meeting. The City Planner advised the City is not invo 'th negotiations with Mr. and Mrs. Tagg. TOWN CENTER CONCERNS, '.. • ` D ' S. TAGG/LARRY MARTIN Mr. Martin, Attorney for Mr. a concern tied to the process is with the design standar standards go too far i . lockin Ta_ came forward and stated there is a lot of things go from here. He stated the biggest concern state he is in support of planning but the design he property without knowing the marketability. It is better that the market •mow to develop the property. There is no finance package in place to make the pri, e ct ork. He asked how long will the property be in limbo if financing isn't available he plan right now has too many missing pieces. He stated he sees the Council making a commitment to how the land will look without knowing if it will work. Mr. Martin continued stating the City needs a solid business plan. The design standards may have a negative impact on the value of the land. The City will be locked in if it receives the grant. With no solid plan, the City does not know if this is the best tax capacity for the City. Does the City need the $1.5 million or is there enough market support to go in another direction? Mayor Bergeson advised residents will have the opportunity to address the issues of the design standards at the Planning and Zoning Board public hearing in September, 2000. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 Mr. Martin stated that once the City gets the grant, the design standards cannot be changed. Council Member Reinert inquired about specific problems with the standards. Mr. Martin stated the commitment the City is making to the design standards is the biggest problem. There may not be a market for the design standards. The City has no evidence that the market will support construction costs based on the design standards. Council Member O'Donnell stated a developer has come in and indicated he can support the standards. Mr. Martin stated the developer has not bought the property and indicated to the City how much financial support is needed. No development will occur until a financial package comes through. Council Member Carlson clarified that the grant money wo ;�, o cover one -half of the infrastructure costs for the project. The Economic Development Assistant stated the C y is`, of ping the design standards together to get a grant. The City has been workin rye, tandards since 1996. The design standards would have been brought b ;, . :m e Cou" cil anyway. It is possible that the City would not have any zoning if the Cif let t1{ market determine development. The whole City is defined by zoning. Mr. Tagg inquired about which h. -: =;4 `structure would be completed with the grant money. Staff advised the infrast oul:.e phased if the project proceeds. Mrs. Tagg stated she standards are too restrictive. Mr. Martin stated that if ere is no business plan, there is no evidence of immediate development. The City is not ready to go because they do not have the land. He stated he recognizes that there is zoning all over. He indicated he is very uncomfortable with the Council locking into the standards for the grant money. Mrs. Tagg stated they have been put in the position by the Planning Department that it is up to them to get to the grant money. These issues should have been resolved before the City applied for the grant. Staff advised the City is not trying to get the grant. The funding is for developers. Mayor Bergeson stated he finds it hard to believe that the City and the property owners would not be better off with the grant money if there is a way to do it. He stated that his 6 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 view of the design standards includes a concept plan of the Town Center area. The Town Center is important to the community and is a cut above regular development. Mr. Martin stated it makes sense to have sound planning and standards. It does not make sense to have standards before it is known if there is market support for the project. The City needs to know how it will make up for the cost of the rest of the infrastructure. Mayor Bergeson stated the timing of these issues is unfortunate. Mr. and Mrs. Tagg do not have a specific proposal and the City is on a deadline for the grant. Mrs. Tagg inquired about the revisions to the standards. The City Administrator advised she will give Mr. and Mrs. Tagg copies of the revisions. Staff noted the revisions are an ongoing process. Council Member Reinert asked Mr. and Mrs. Tagg what the the project. Mr. Martin stated there are three (3) elements Mr. 1. Mixed use is acceptable. 2. Design standards need to be yore fl 3. A business plan is neede c ng Mrs. Tagg asked why the standar property. for relating to are looking for: 'ble and subject to revision. ming and additional funding. Hall area are not acceptable for her The Community Develop tN irec r advised the City did not have the design standards in place why the " all was constructed. Mayor Bergeson stated Ye fs lowing question needs to be addressed: How do the proposed standards com' . e to what has already been built? Council Member Carlson stated she supports mixed use and commercial but she does not think the City has the plan together. The City has a plan with the idea that it will be changed. She expressed concern regarding the time frame allowed in changing the standards. She stated she has concerns that this project is special enough and how much it will cost the City. There is a definite economic gap. She also expressed concern regarding losing the things the City had originally planned. She stated she does not believe the City is making progress regarding the project. She stated she does not want to lose the funding but does not see how the City can put the plan together in time. . The Community Development Director stated this is the first time he has heard a comfort level with mixed use. There are all kinds of questions relating to economics. Revisions CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 are being made in response to various City Boards and landowners concerns. The City Council has the prerogative to take more time to review and revise the standards. Mr. Martin referred to a February 9, 2000, correspondence to the City that supports mixed use. He stated he hopes the Council does not lock in before a proper review period. Market evidence of support and a financial package is needed. Mayor Bergeson encouraged Mr. and Mrs. Tagg to keep the lines of communication open with the City. Council Member Carlson asked what the City is locked into if the grant is accepted. The Economic Development Assistant advised part of what the City is locked into will be negotiated. The City will have to meet the criteria of the Livable Communities. The design standards will say there will be a minimum of 10 units per with a maximum of 30 units per acre. Council Member Carlson stated the design standards sho than the application that was made for the grant. Staf calls for more housing. Revisions in the standards ho it meets the intent of the standards. using numbers f the concept plans ies are flexible provided The City Planner advised a specific number ill be moved from the design standards. Mayor Bergeson asked if the City h standards. Staff advised a clarifi standards. Council Member O'Don 30 units per acre if 11.units p go forward and the M arding the specific numbers in the ade regarding the numbers in the design d i e Metropolitan Council can force the City to build c e is not feasible. Staff advised the project would not Council enforced that. Mr. Martin advised once: agency gets a guiding document, that document will dictate their decisions. They may not be flexible on the issue of density. The flexibility of the Metropolitan Council has not been explored. Mrs. Tagg asked when she can get a comparison of the City Hall standards as opposed to the proposed design standards. The Economic Development Director advised a comparison of standards will be presented at the Council meeting and the public hearing at the September 2000, Planning and Zoning Board meeting. This item will be added to the regular Council agenda Monday, August 28, 2000, 6:30 p.m. 8 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 • UPDATE ON 77TH STREET, JOHN POWELL • • Staff advised when the right -of -way was vacated it was expected there would be more traffic. A connection to Lake Drive is needed. The City may want to consider a cul -de- sac on Carol Drive. Truck traffic may continue to use 77th Street depending on which way they are going. Mayor Bergeson advised the Police Department could also restrict the traffic. A cul -de- sac was developed on Sunrise Avenue when the intersection was redone. At that time there were a lot of complaints. Eventually residents were very happy with the cul -de -sac. He suggested the same type of arrangement be used for 77th Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, LINDA WAITE SMITH Staff advised the minutes from previous meetings would be dis ':u ® oon. Meetings will be scheduled when the Council reviews the Council cal MINNEGASCO FRANCHISE, LINDA WAITE S1 Staff advised two (2) weeks ago a confirmation f , e` = oun it was requested regarding the Minnegasco franchise. Staff distributed a • � _ at nksheet to be sent to residents explaining the new fee. Staff asked for Cou cil fe • ack and direction regarding the information sheet and setting a public hearin Council Member O'Donnell sugge nt indicating that the funds will be used to reduce future assessments shy a. :6 >® to the information sheet. The City Engineer sugges „ ate t that the fee will help the City meet the City's current needs for road recon ction costs. Mayor Bergeson adde ` � • is ssion should be had regarding the other franchise fee that is already being collecte He suggested that fee be added to the road reconstruction fund. Staff advised the City will also be receiving a fee from NSP in the future. This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, August 28, 2000, 6:30 p.m. REGULAR AGENDA, AUGUST 28, 2000 Item 7C, CSAH 49 Update — Council directed staff to not move forward with a citizens task force and hot line at this time. Another neighborhood meeting will be scheduled after the City's joint meeting with Shoreview. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 23, 2000 The City Administrator advised a closed Council meeting is scheduled for 6:00 p.m., Monday, August 28, 2000, prior to the regular Council meeting. The following was added to the Community Calendar: Comprehensive Plan Work Session, Saturday, September 9, 2000, 8:00 a.m. — 10:00 a.m. Comprehensive Plan Work Session, Saturday, September 16, 2000, 8:00 a.m. — 10:00 a.m. Comprehensive Plan Work Session, Saturday, September 23, 2000, 8:00 a.m. — 10:00 a.m. Staff advised advance notice is needed if staff member should be present at any of the meetings. Council directed staff to contact Mr. Brixius regarding his a 2000, meeting. Staff will schedule a meeting on Septem cannot be present on September 9, 2000. The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. he September 9, r. Brixius These minutes were considered, corrected ar. appr:ed at the regular Council meeting held on September 11, 2000. • Ry -Chel Gaustad, City C = Joh Transcribed by: Kim Points TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 10 on a erg y or • •