Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02/12/2001 Council Packet
AGENDA UPDATED AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday February 12, 2001 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call: Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) February 12, 2001 (Check No. 61102 through 61170 in the amount of $339,423.75) ii) Centennial Fire District B) Resolution No. 01 -21 Approving Application for Transient Merchant License. C) Resolution No. 01 -22 Approving Application for Minnesota Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit LG220 to Permit Bingo at St. Joseph Church. D) Resolution No. 01 -23 Approving Premises Permit Renewal Application for Lawful Gambling at Shirley Kaye's of Lino Lakes. 2. Open Mike A) Fire Chief Milo Bennett to Present Donation to the City of Lino Lakes 3. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) PUBLIC HEARING- Resolution No. 01 -20, Authorizing Submission of Outdoor Recreation Grant Application, Rick DeGardner 4. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) PUBLIC HEARING- Resolution No. 01 -05, Proposed Utility Rates for 2001 -2003, Al Rolek/John Powell (CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 26, MEETING) 5. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Resolution No. 01 -25, Consider Extending the Term of the Cable Franchise Granted to MediaOne AT &T Broadband Page 1 AGENDA B) Consider Approval of AFSCME Contract, Linda Waite Smith (3/5 vote required) 6. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) Resolution No. 01 -24 Authorizing a contract with the State of Minnesota for T1 Access Circuit & Supported Telecommunication Equipment, Police Chief Dave Pecchia (3/5 vote required) B) Accept Resignation of Officer, Police Chief Dave Pecchia (3/5 Vote Required) 7. Community Development Department Report A) Resolution No. 01 -27 Final Payment for 2000 Wear Course and Trail Paving, John Powell (3/5 Vote Required) B) Blackduck Trail Subdivision, Mary Kay Wyland (3/5 Vote Required) C) Circle -Lex VFW, 7868 Lake Drive, CUP Extension, Resolution No. 2001- 26 Mary Kay Wyland D) First Readings, Ordinances 01 -01 and 02 -01, Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Allocate 2.55 Acres of MUSA Reserve (4/5 vote required for each ordinance), and Resolution 01 -06 approving Preliminary Plat for Behm's Farm Park Addition (3/5 vote required), Century Farms Development, Jeff Smyser E) First Reading, Ordinance 03 -01, Rezone City Hall Park from Rural to Public Semi - Public to allow for the location of a PCS tower, (4/5 vote required), Qwest Wireless LLC, Jeff Smyser F) Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive, Variance, (3/5 vote required), Resolution No. 2001 -2, Jeff Smyser 8. Unfinished Business A) December 13, 2000, Council Work Session Meeting Minutes B) December 18, 2000, Council Meeting Minutes C) January 3, 2001, Council Work Session Meeting Minutes D) January 8, 2001, Council Meeting Minutes E) January 17, 2001, Council Meeting Minutes F) January 22, 2001, Council Meeting Minutes 9. New Business Page 2 AGENDA 10. Community Calendar, February 12, 2001 through February 26, 2001: A) Tuesday, February 13, 2001, 6:30 p.m., Planning and Zoning Board Meeting (note date change) B) Friday, February 16, 2001, 7:00 a.m., Comp Plan Work Session C) Monday, February 19, 2001, CITY HALL CLOSED in observance of President's Day D) Wednesday, February 21, 2001, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session E) Monday, February 26, 2001. 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 11. Adjourn Revised 2/09/01 rdg 9:24 a.m. Page 3 EXPENDITURES FEBRUARY 12, 2001 Date: 01/25/2001 Time: 13:49:54 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1456 - 1456 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000585 ASSEMBLED PRODUCTS CORPORATION 1 241.42 241.42 .00 .00 000586 GNW 1 15,492.00 15,492.00 .00 .00 000587 TIES - #925 1 663.81 663.81 .00 .00 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 2 508.69 508.69 .00 .00 000810 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 1 2,290.23 2,290.23 .00 .00 001473 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL HEALTH CARE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 003194 NOL -TEC SYSTEMS, INC. 1 6,817.00 6,817.00 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 2 170.00 170.00 .00 .00 004209 STEELCASE, INC. 1 3,962.48 3,962.48 .00 .00 004440 TJB SUPER ENERGY HOMES 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 005016 PROGRESSIVE ENGINEERING 1 4,034.00 4,034.00 .00 .00 005017 LINO LAKES BUSINESS CENTER /I 1 29,168.00 29,168.00 .00 .00 005019 NORTHERN WHOLESALE, INC. 1 36,087.00 36,087.00 .00 .00 006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 257.58 257.58 .00 .00 900219 TAYLOR CORPORATION 1 38,489.00 38,489.00 .00 .00 900569 COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF WILLOW PONDS 1 17,144.00 17,144.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 19 156,475.21 156,475.21 .00 .00* Date: 01/25/2001 Time: 13:55:38 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1457 1457 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S Sort: N Operator: JAL Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000151 PUBLICORP, INC. 1 165.00 165.00 .00 .00 000173 ANDOVER, CITY OF 2 185.00 185.00 .00 .00 000191 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 403.64 403.64 .00 .00 000312 GUINN, MARK 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000430 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 000431 GORSKI, MARK 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000588 ALLEN, DAVID 1 250.00 250.00 .00 .00 000589 BOLAND, MIKE 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000590 J. J. KELLER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 209.76 209.76 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 6,600.00 6,600.00 .00 .00 001211 COUNTRY INN - WHITE BEAR LAKE 1 1,027.25 1,027.25 .00 .00 001980 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. 1 242.53 242.53 .00 .00 002486 MATT PARROTT AND SONS COMPANY, INC. 1 346.94 346.94 .00 .00 002508 MUNICIPAL CLERKS /FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 1 920.00 920.00 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 53.00 53.00 .00 .00 003491 PETTY CASH 1 56.74 56.74 .00 .00 003789 RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 5,535.25 5,535.25 .00 .00 004059 SMYSER, JEFF 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 1 638.00 638.00 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 1 6,650.92 6,650.92 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 3 416.56 416.56 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 25 23,941.09 23,941.09 .00 .00* Date: 02/01/2001 Time: 11:13:32 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1468 - 1468 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 1 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000310 STUDIOWORKS 1 1,300.57 1,300.57 .00 .00 000591 EDINA REALTY 1 256.91 256.91 .00 .00 000592 KIVENEN, TODD 1 256.91 256.91 .00 .00 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 30.55 30.55 .00 .00 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 294.00 294.00 .00 .00 003285 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 1,531.25 1,531.25 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 2 184.00 184.00 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 1 45,490.00 45,490.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 10 49,344.19 49,344.19 .00 .00* Date: 02/01/2001 Time: 11:13:48 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1469 - 1469 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000026 DOOR SERVICE OF ST. CLOUD 1 68.90 68.90 .00 .00 000051 A T & T 1 3.35 3.35 .00 .00 000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 345.32 345.32 .00 .00 000312 GUINN, MARK 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #14 1 509.06 509.06 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 55.18 55.18 .00 .00 000593 BLACKBIRD, JIM 1 176.59 176.59 .00 .00 000594 EWERT, LISA 1 33.00 33.00 .00 .00 000595 HOGSTAD, LISA 1 125.00 125.00 .00 .00 000596 NPELRA 2001 ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE 1 395.00 395.00 .00 .00 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 90.08 90.08 .00 .00 000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 1 69.79 69.79 .00 .00 000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 26.87 26.87 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 345.28 345.28 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 5,374.90 5,374.90 .00 .00 001230 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 1 26.26 26.26 .00 .00 001267 CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES, INC. 1 15.95 15.95 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 2,381.85 2,381.85 .00 .00 001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 69.97 69.97 .00 .00 001932 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1 3,717.69 3,717.69 .00 .00 002540 MEDICA 1 19,320.44 19,320.44 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 1 48.46 48.46 .00 .00 Date: 02/01/2001 Time: 11:13:49 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002820 MN. POLLUTION CTROL AGENCY 1 23.00 23.00 .00 .00 003090 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 107.20 107.20 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 597.59 597.59 .00 .00 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 14,642.41 14,642.41 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 2,869.56 2,869.56 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 5 550.97 550.97 .00 .00 004671 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 .66 .66 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 33 52,003.83 52,003.83 .00 .00* Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:16:01 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1477 - 1477 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 143.44 143.44 .00 .00 000465 MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTECH GROUP 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 405.33 405.33 .00 .00 002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 349.20 349.20 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 84.64 84.64 .00 .00 003500 PHOTO WORLD, INC. 1 34.02 34.02 .00 .00 003789 RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 199.10 199.10 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 8 1,262.73 1,262.73 .00 .00* Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:16:18 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1478 - 1478 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000082 J. H. LARSON COMPANY, INC. 1 125.13 125.13 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 2 288.54 288.54 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 2,083.71 2,083.71 .00 .00 000183 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 1 87.18 87.18 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 2 69.06 69.06 .00 .00 000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 89.08 89.08 .00 .00 000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 2 133.63 133.63 .00 .00 000370 ANOKA COUNTY 1 900.00 900.00 .00 .00 000430 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 1 28.00 28.00 .00 .00 000502 D. THOMAS JEWELRY 1 339.74 339.74 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 1,265.65 1,265.65 .00 .00 000597 AMERICAN ELECTRIC 1 80.50 80.50 .00 .00 000598 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 1 1,428.41 1,428.41 .00 .00 000599 GOVERNOR'S EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CONF 1 110.00 110.00 .00 .00 000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 1 145.18 145.18 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 216.82 216.82 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 2 240.62 240.62 .00 .00 001109 CHEMSEARCH, INC. 1 146.82 146.82 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 2,540.86 2,540.86 .00 .00 001230 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 1 57.51 57.51 .00 .00 001255 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 1 1,551.14 1,551.14 .00 .00 Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:16:18 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001270 DALCO, INC. 2 267.17 267.17 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 4 6,775.57 6,775.57 .00 .00 001360 E. L. REINHARDT COMPANY, INC. 1 85.42 85.42 .00 .00 001455 FBI NORTHWEST CHAPTER /FBINAA 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 630.30 630.30 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 304.45 304.45 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 1 150.97 150.97 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 169.80 169.80 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 1 59.91 59.91 .00 .00 001621 GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC. 2 1,685.57 1,685.57 .00 .00 002142 KIEGER ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 3,195.00 3,195.00 .00 .00 002210 L.E.E.D.A. 1 195.00 195.00 .00 .00 002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 5.71 5.71 .00 .00 002332 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 1 106.50 106.50 .00 .00 002431 LINO LAKES TRANSMISSION, INC. 1 1,934.53 1,934.53 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 3 197.46 197.46 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 2 430.05 430.05 .00 .00 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 2 158.34 158.34 .00 .00 002720 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTY MGMT ASSOC 1 77.00 77.00 .00 .00 002929 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ED FOUNDATION 1 280.00 280.00 .00 .00 003120 NATIONAL REC /PARK ASSOCIATION 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 2,960.45 2,960.45 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 371.30 371.30 .00 .00 003452 PERA /COUNCIL 1 221.92 221.92 .00 .00 003456 PADGETT - THOMPSON 1 169.00 169.00 .00 .00 003508 PINKERTON SERVICE GROUP, INC. 1 100.32 100.32 .00 .00 • Date:'02 /06/2001 Time: 14:16:20 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 111.90 111.90 .00 .00 004010 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC. 1 57.34 57.34 .00 .00 004060 SNAP -ON TOOL, INC. 1 97.45 97.45 .00 .00 004239 STREGE, KENT 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,579.50 1,579.50 .00 .00 004280 SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC. 1 124.61 124.61 .00 .00 004302 SURPLUS SERVICES 1 36.00 36.00 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 2 662.50 662.50 .00 .00 004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC. 1 104.17 104.17 .00 .00 004630 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 004671 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 407.07 407.07 .00 .00 004709 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 1 249.00 249.00 .00 .00 005031 GOPHER SPORT, INC. 2 395.62 395.62 .00 .00 900448 GEPHART ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 19,000.00 19,000.00 .00 .00 900523 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. 1 173.75 173.75 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 3 330.47 330.47 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 82 56,396.70 56,396.70 .00 .00* Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:42:10 Operator: JAL Ranges: Options: Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 61059 61019 0 0 61021 61024 61026 61068 61086 61070 61032 61033 61071 61073 61088 61089 61074 0 61079 61053 1458 - 1480 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount AFSCME COUNCIL #14 ALLEN, DAVID AMERICAN ELECTRIC ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI BOLAND, MIKE CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M EDINA REALTY EWERT, LISA GORSKI, MARK GUINN, MARK GUINN, MARK ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCI KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN KIVENEN, TODD MEDICA PERA /COUNCIL PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** ENTERTAINER * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE ELECTRICAL PER * * * * * * ** PARCEL SEARCH PARCEL SEARCH REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC DONATION DENTAL INSURANCE REIMBURSE ASSESSMENTS REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC PAYROLL WITHHOLDING LEGAL SERVICE /NO AMERICA REIMBURSE ASSESSMENTS MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PERA /REGULAR PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** TJB SUPER ENERGY HOMES REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6442 L * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** O METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, BASKETBALLS Total for Dept 202 ADULT SP O GREG LARSON SPORTS - G REBOUNDER /SCOREBOARD /PUC OTHER Total for Dept 204 O GOPHER SPORT, INC. SORRY /CHECKERS /UNO /SPORT YOUTH IN O GREG LARSON SPORTS - G TEACHING TOWER /BATTERY /H YOUTH IN O METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, BALL LOCKER YOUTH IN 0 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. BASKETBALL PICTURES YOUTH IN Total for Dept 207 O GOPHER SPORT, INC. KIT /SPORTS SHADE YOUTH SP O GREG LARSON SPORTS - G REBOUNDER /SCOREBOARD /PUC YOUTH SP 509.06 200.00 80.50 28.00 25.00 13.50 6,600.00 1,363.20 256.91 33.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 3,717.69 294.00 256.91 4,884.65 221.92 14,642.41 1,000.00 34,167.25* 164.86 164.86* 169.94 169.94* 41.30 803.90 265.19 249.00 1,359.39* 354.32 711.73 Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:42:10 Operator: JAL Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 208 1,066.05* 61019 ALLEN, DAVID ENTERTAINER MAYOR /CO 50.00 O BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. PLAQUES MAYOR /CO 145.18 61029 COUNTRY INN - WHITE B RECOGNITION DINNER MAYOR /CO 1,027.25 O D. THOMAS JEWELRY PINS /PENDANTS /STONE MAYOR /CO 339.74 61056 M HOGSTAD, LISA REIMBURSE RECOGNITION DI MAYOR /CO 125.00 O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI REGISTRATION /D CARLSON MAYOR /CO 150.00 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JANUARY 22 MAYOR /CO 428.00 61052 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 3, 8, 11 MAYOR /CO 188.00 Total for Dept 401 2,453.17* 61057 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE ADMINIST 28.32 61068 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINIST 88.40 61030 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONA DRUG SCREEN ADMINIST 150.00 O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ADMINIST 84.64 O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI REGISTRATION /L W SMITH ADMINIST 10.00 61074 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINIST 657.53 O MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTY MEMBERSHIP /D TESCH ADMINIST 77.00 61040 MUNICIPAL CLERKS /FINAN APPLICATION FEE ADMINIST 25.00 61078 NPELRA 2001 ANNUAL TRA CONFERENCE /D TESCH ADMINIST 395.00 O PINKERTON SERVICE GROU DRUG TESTING ADMINIST 100.32 Total for Dept 402 1,616.21* 61052 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 3, 8, 11 CHARTER 225.00 Total for Dept 405 225.00* 61057 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE SENIORS 39.63 61068 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SENIORS 13.82 O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SENIORS 3.62 Total for Dept 406 57.07* 61068 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FINANCE 55.26 O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FINANCE 27.90 61038 MATT PARROTT AND SONS A/P CHECKS FINANCE 346.94 61074 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FINANCE 425.00 61045 PUBLICORP, INC. REGISTRATION /AL R FINANCE 165.00 Total for Dept 407 1,020.10* 61057 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE ECONOMIC 27.24 61068 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC 44.20 O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ECONOMIC 25.66 61074 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC 207.53 61091 STUDIOWORKS MASTER TOWN CENTER DEV P ECONOMIC 1,300.57 O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JANUARY 10/17 ECONOMIC 234.50 Total for Dept 415 1,839.70* 61068 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE PLANNING 44.20 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PLANNING 21.21 61074 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE PLANNING 207.53 Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:42:11 Operator: JAL Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description 0 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN NAMEPLATES 61047 SMYSER, JEFF RESERVATION Total for Dept 416 Dept PLANNING PLANNING 61068 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE Communit 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Communit Total for Dept 418 61058 A T & T MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE 0 ANOKA COUNTY QUARTERLY BILLING MOBILE POLICE 61022 ASSEMBLED PRODUCTS COR O CONNEXUS ENERGY O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC 61027 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC O CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 61068 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 61069 DOOR SERVICE OF ST. CL 0 FBI NORTHWEST CHAPTER/ 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. O GALL'S INC. O GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN O GOVERNOR'S EMERGENCY M O L.E.E.D.A. 61074 MEDICA 0 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. O MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ED O MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTEC O PADGETT - THOMPSON O PHOTO WORLD, INC. O STREGE, KENT 61082 STREICHER'S, INC. VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS 0 61083 61068 0 0 61074 61020 0 61068 0 61074 0 61057 MDT STAND MONTHLY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES UNIFORM SUPPLIES DENTAL INSURANCE TRANSMITTER MEMBERSHIP /STEVE M LONG TERM DISABILITY INS UNIFORM SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE REGISTRATION /D PECCHIA CONFERENCE /D PECCHIA MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE REGISTRATION /D PECCHIA DECEMBER USAGE SEMINAR /K RAUSCH FILM PROCESSING CASH ADVANCE UNIFORM SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FIRE FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FIRE GEPHART ELECTRIC COMPA ELECTRICAL MATERAL & LAB FIRE MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FIRE Total for Dept 421 ANDOVER, CITY OF REGISTRATION /CARRI V BUILDING C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES BUILDING DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS BUILDING MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE BUILDING SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS BUILDING Total for Dept 422 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE STREETS Amount 19.11 150.00 442.05* 22.11 7.18 29.29* 3.35 900.00 241.42 10.65 94.22 359.59 1,551.14 327.94 68.90 60.00 243.35 150.97 59.91 110.00 195.00 7,111.96 53.80 280.00 37.00 169.00 34.02 200.00 550.97 407.07 .66 13,220.92* 35.91 16.00 19,000.00 691.00 19,742.91* 185.00 5.79 44.20 19.19 657.53 1,579.50 2,491.21* 27.24 Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:42:12 Operator: JAL Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 61061 0 61068 0 0 0 61037 61074 0 0 Description Dept Amount AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, BLACKBIRD, JIM CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE KIEGER ENTERPRISES, IN MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, IN MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPAN REPLACE PHOTOCELL REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES SNOWPLOW RENTAL BROOM /STREET SWEEPER MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE BUILDING /STREET LIGHT RE STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS 61018 M RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPAN STREET LIGHT REPAIR STREETS 0 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE STREETS Total for Dept 430 0 61062 0 0 0 61066 61067 0 61068 0 0 0 0 0 61074 0 0 0 0 0 0 61060 0 61065 0 0 61027 0 0 0 61034 0 61035 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU BOYER TRUCKS, INC. BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. CHEMSEARCH, INC. CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M PARTS /SUPPLIES PULLEY PARTS /SUPPLIES AEROSOL 2" BALL DUST CAP /FILLER CAP PULLEY /BELT DIESEL DENTAL INSURANCE FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I CHEMICALS /CLEANER LEEF BROTHER, INC. SHOP TOWELS LINO LAKES TRANSMISSIO CONVERTER /KITS /SOLENOIDS MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE MENARDS, INC. BOARDS /PAINT SNAP -ON TOOL, INC. HOSE CLAMP SURPLUS SERVICES FILE CABINET UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT WORKSHOP /T DEWOLFE & L R Total for Dept 431 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR MAT RENTAL BERNSTEIN, BARRY MILEAGE /SUPPLIES C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF CONNEXUS ENERGY CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC DALCO, INC. FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE GOVERNME MOBILE PEDESTAL GOVERNME OFFICE SUPPLIES GOVERNME JANITORIAL SUPPLIES GOVERNME LONG TERM DISABILITY INS GOVERNME FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, TONER CARTRIDGE J. H. LARSON COMPANY, SUPPLIES J. J. KELLER & ASSOCIA FORMS GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 143.44 176.59 496.17 132.61 48.68 33.32 3,195.00 403.64 1,037.65 4.42 114.50 5,535.25 2,960.45 14,308.96* 69.06 69.79 216.82 146.82 57.51 26.26 15.95 6,775.57 22.10 9.54 44.32 169.80 5.71 1,934.53 425.00 6.85 97.45 36.00 100.00 10,229.08* 288.54 133.63 13.83 218.00 4,889.94 1,011.58 236.25 10.63 267.17 6.73 152.00 242.53 125.13 209.76 Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:42:12 Operator: JAL Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 61074 0 61077 0 61043 0 0 61081 61048 0 61051 0 0 61057 61025 61065 61068 0 0 61072 61074 0 61075 0 61039 0 0 61080 61050 Description Dept Amount LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, I MEDICA MENARDS, INC. NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT OFFICEMAX, INC. PETTY CASH QWEST RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPAN SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI STEELCASE, INC. SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMP TIES - #925 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. A T & T WIRELESS BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, L CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE HOFFMAN, MICHAEL MEDICA MENARDS, INC. MENARDS, INC. SERVICE CALL MEDICAL INSURANCE BOARDS /PAINT FIRE EXTINGUISHER OFFICE SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING MONTHLY SERVICE BUILDING /STREET LIGHT SERVICE AGREEMENT OFFICE FURNITURE FLUORESCENT BULBS TECHNICAL SUPPORT OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIR MULTI -FOLD TOWELS Total for Dept 432 GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME RE GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATIONAL PLANNING MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW PARKS MEDICAL INSURANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PICNIC TABLE SUPPLIES MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. REGISTRATION /4 NATURE CALLS, INC. PORTABLE RESTROOMS QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS SERVICE AGREEMENT Total for Dept 450 PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS 61057 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATI 61023 BERNSTEIN, BARRY REIMBURSE TUITION RECREATI 61060 BERNSTEIN, BARRY MILEAGE /SUPPLIES RECREATI 61063 BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE /LUNCH RECREATI 61027 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATI 61068 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI O E. L. REINHARDT COMPAN PADLOCK RECREATI O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RECREATI O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES RECREATI 61074 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE RECREATI 0 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATI O NATIONAL PEN CORPORATI SPORTS FILE RECREATI O NATIONAL REC /PARK ASSO DUES /B BERNSTEIN RECREATI 61050 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS SERVICE AGREEMENT RECREATI Total for Dept 451 106.50 425.00 48.96 107.20 455.94 56.74 1,194.96 84.60 2,869.56 3,962.48 124.61 663.81 104.17 89.08 18,099.33* 55.28 2,290.23 484.96 121.59 49.84 253.21 69.97 1,512.50 141.65 48.46 8.84 920.00 349.20 70.69 55.18 103.04 6,534.64* 32.60 508.69 106.80 26.87 46.34 26.52 85.42 28.03 6.91 292.53 8.84 87.18 35.00 154.54 1,446.27* Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:42:13 Operator: JAL Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN NAMEPLATES Total for Dept 452 PARK BOA 61057 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES ENVIRONM O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ENVIRONM 61074 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM O SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN NAMEPLATES ENVIRONM 61052 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 3, 8, 11 ENVIRONM Total for Dept 461 0 61074 0 61046 61090 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SOLID WA MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL Total for Dept 462 SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA SOLID WA O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FORESTRY 61074 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FORESTRY Total for Dept 463 61057 0 61064 0 61068 0 0 0 61074 0 0 61054 61092 61084 61064 0 61068 0 61074 0 61076 0 61055 61084 A T & T WIRELESS AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, MEDICA MONTHLY SERVICE REPLACE HEATER UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES CITY WATER SAMPLES MEDICAL INSURANCE MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP MARKING PAINT /FLAG U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, MIU -PHONE U.S. FILTER / WATERPRO, WATER METER PARTS XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 494 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE SEWER MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER DENTAL INSURANCE SEWER LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SEWER MEDICAL INSURANCE SEWER MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER MN. POLLUTION CTROL AG LICENSE RENEWAL OLSON SEWER SERVICE, I TELEVISING SEWER LINE XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 495 SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER 19.12 19.12* 27.24 16.83 5.55 202.50 19.11 225.00 496.23* 1.23 45.00 111.90 170.00 184.00 512.13* 5.56 202.50 208.06* 107.77 2,083.71 172.64 764.05 19.90 13.22 220.02 63.00 167.52 4.42 1,428.41 6,650.92 45,490.00 412.54 57,598.12* 172.64 258.41 19.89 13.17 167.51 78.02 23.00 173.75 53.00 185.05 1,144.44* Date: 02/06/2001 Time: 14:42:13 Operator: JAL Page: 7 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 61028 COTTAGE HOMESTEADS OF TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO OTHER 17,144.00 61087 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, PAY -AS- YOU -GO CALCULATIO OTHER 156.25 Total for Dept 499 17,300.25* 61087 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, PAY -AS- YOU -GO CALCULATIO TIF ADMI 1,375.00 Total for Dept 500 1,375.00* 61041 NOL -TEC SYSTEMS, INC. TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO NOL -TEC 6,817.00 Total for Dept 503 6,817.00* 61036 LINO LAKES BUSINESS CE TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO CUSTOM R 29,168.00 Total for Dept 506 29,168.00* 61044 PROGRESSIVE ENGINEERIN TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO PROGRESS 4,034.00 Total for Dept 507 4,034.00* 61049 TAYLOR CORPORATION TIF PAY -AS -YOU -GO ADGRAPHI 38,489.00 Total for Dept 509 38,489.00* 61042 NORTHERN WHOLESALE, IN TIF - PAY -AS -YOU -GO NORTHER 36,087.00 Total for Dept 510 36,087.00* 61031 GNW TIF PAY -AS -YOU -GO GNW MECH 15,492.00 Total for Dept 511 15,492.00* Grand Total 339,423.75* Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax February 6, 2001 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12511 — 12544, in the amount of $26,190.52 is hereby requested. DATE CHECK# NAME 02/06/2001 12511 02/06/2001 12512 02/06/2001 12513 02/06/2001 12514 02/06/2001 12515 02/06/2001 12516 02/06/2001 12517 02/06/2001 12518 02/06/2001 12519 02/06/2001 12520 02/06/2001 12521 02/06/2001 12522 02/06/2001 12523 02/06/2001 12524 02/06/2001 12525 02/06/2001 12526 02/06/2001 12527 02/06/2001 12528 02/06/2001 12529 02/06/2001 12530 02/06/2001 12531 02/06/2001 12532 02/06/2001 12533 02/06/2001 12534 02/06/2001 12535 02/06/2001 12536 02/06/2001 12537 02/06/2001 12538 02/06/2001 12539 02/06/2001 12540 02/06/2001 12541 02/06/2001 12542 02/06/2001 12543 02/06/2001 12544 Centennial Fire District Check Register Amaco Oil Company Arrowhead EMS Assn. Arthur Mohler AT &T Wireless Centennial Fire Relief Assn. Centennial Utilities Circle Pines Office Products City of Centerville City of Lino Lakes Dalco Dan Lallier Eddy Brothers Company Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Frattallone's Hardware Hedline Computers Image Printing & Graphics International Assn. of Fire Chiefs Janet Haapoja VOID Mayo Systems Metro Fire Milo Bennett MN Chapter IAAI /Jeffrey G. Schadegg MN Fire Agencies Purchasing Consortium Oxygen Service Company, Inc. Qwest Reliant Energy Minnegasco Rick Mros S & S Building Enterprises, Inc. Tim's Quality Plumbing, Inc. Verizon Wireless Viking Office Products Walgreen Company Superior Products Mfg. Company ACCOUNT 42100 - Fuel and Lube 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42230 - Cleaning Supplies 42240 - Telephone Expence 43010 - Relief Association 42251 - Station 1 Gas 42180 - Office Supplies 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 43030 - Common Area Charge 42230 - Cleaning Supplies 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42130 - Equipment Expense 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 42230 - Cleaning Supplies 42180 - Office Supplies 42180 - Office Supplies 42200 - Dues and Memberships 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies VOID 42110 - Other Maintenance 42130 - Equipment Expense 42110 - Other Maintenance 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42200 - Dues and Memberships 42270 - Breathing Air 42240 - Telephone Expence 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 42110 - Other Maintenance 42240 - Telephone Expence 42180 - Office Supplies 42150 - Medical Expense 42130 - Equipment Expense Total Page 1 of 1 AMOUNT 276.70 290.00 5.07 3.28 5,375.00 695.96 14.98 30.00 5,973.50 126.15 115.25 257.30 779.54 54.64 51.50 67.89 160.00 18.09 0.00 2,640.00 964.96 164.87 865.00 35.00 153.94 1.93 1,214.28 495.00 4,700.00 99.00 163.53 69.18 10.07 318.91 $26,190.52 STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE OF MEETING: TOPIC: CONSENT AGENDA 1B Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk February 12, 2001 Resolution No. 01 -21, Approving Application for Transient Merchant License. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote Required) BACKGROUND: James Bard of Bard Flowers has submitted an application to sell flowers at the 49 Club Parking Lot. Mr. Bard has complied with all of the provisions of the Lino Lake City Code for obtaining the necessary license. The Police Department conducted a background check and found nothing that would prohibit this license. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 01 -21, Approving Application for Transient Merchant License. 2. Deny Resolution No. 01 -21, Approving Application for Transient Merchant License. 3. Return to staff for further review and/or action. RECOMMENDATION: Option #1: Approve Resolution 01 -21, Approving application for Transient Merchant Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION 01 -21 TRANSIENT MERCHANTS LICENSE WHEREAS, James Bard, 6007 Hodgson Road, has complied with all of the provisions of Ordinance No. 01 -89 of the Lino Lakes City Code for obtaining the necessary license for a profit organization: NOW, THERFORE, by order of the Lino Lakes City Council, and by virtue thereof, the said James Bard at 6007 Hodgson Road is hereby authorized to solicit for his own organization for a period of six (6) months starting February 1, 2001 and ending August 1, 2001 and subject to all conditions and provisions of said ordinance. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND and the corporate seal of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk (Seal) STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 1C Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk February 12, 2001 Resolution No. 01 -22, Approving Application for Minnesota Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit LG220 at St. Joseph Church. Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) The Church of St. Joseph's submitted a permit application to conduct bingo at 171 Elm Street, on Sunday, April 1, 2001, from 5:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Resolution 2001 -22 approves the application for Minnesota Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit LG220 at St. Joseph Church and it waive the 30 day waiting period. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 2001 -22 2. Deny Resolution No. 2001 -22 RECOMMENDATION: Option 1: Approve Resolution No. 2001 -22 Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-22 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING EXEMPT PERMIT LG220 TO PERMIT BINGO AT ST. JOSEPH CHURCH WHEREAS, the Church of St. Joseph's has made a request to the City of Lino Lakes to conduct bingo at a gathering, and WHEREAS, the bingo event is proposed to be conducted at 171 Elm Street, Lino Lakes, on Sunday, April 1, 2001 between 5:30 p.m. - 11:00 p.m., and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Gambling Control Board requires the City of Lino Lakes to acknowledge and approve the application prior to the States consideration, and WHEREAS, on behalf of the City, the Council acknowledges this application and its three options for the city: 1. Approve the application: By taking no action, the city allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. 2. Waive the above - mentioned waiting period: The city allows the Board to issue a permit before 30 days. 3. Deny the application by passing a rejection resolution with in 30 days of the event. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes hereby grants authorization to approve St. Joseph Church to make application for Exempt Permit to conduct bingo at the stated location and date and to waive the above - mentioned waiting period. . NOW, THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Lino Lakes hereby does grant permission to conduct bingo on Sunday, April 1, 2001, at St. Joseph Church 171 Elm Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12 day of February 2001. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Page 1 of 2 8 /00 !VI lnl VJIJL LaWILII .2aulunIly LG220 - Application for Exempt Permit Fee - $25 For Board Use Only Fee Paid Check No. _ Organization Information Organization name Church of St. Josepa Previous lawful gambling exemption number of Linn LakPS X -98004 Street 171 Elm Street City Lino Lakes State /Zip Code MN 55019 County Annka Name of chief executive officer (CEO) First name Last name Timothy Morin Daytime phone number of CEO 651— 784 -3015 Name of treasurer First name Last name Ronald Bausch Daytime phone number of treasurer: 763 - 780 -2128 Type of Nonprofit Organization Check the box that best describes your organization: ❑ Fraternal xD Religious ❑ Veteran ❑ Other nonprofit organization Check the box that indicates the type of proof your organization attached to this application: ❑ IRS letter indicating income tax exempt status ❑ Certificate of Good Standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's Office ❑ A charter showing you are an affiliate of a parent nonprofit organization ❑ Proof previously submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board Gambling Premises Information Name of premises where gambling activity will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place) Church of St.Joseph Great Hall Address (do not use PO box) 171 Elm Street City Lino Lakes State /Zip Code MN 55014 County Anoka Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing) April 1, 2001 Check the box or boxes that indicate the type of gambling activity your organization will be conducting: 0 *Bingo ❑ Raffles ❑ *Paddlewheels ❑ *Pull-Tabs ❑ *Tipboards *Equipment for these activities must be obtained from a licensed distributor. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. You have the right to refuse to supply the information requested; however, if you refuse to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue you a permit. If you supply the information requested, the Board will be able to process your application. Your name and and your organization's name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All the other information that you provide will be private data about you until the Board issues your permit. When the Board issues your permit, all of the information that you have provided to the Board in the process of applying for your permit will become public. If the Board does not issue you a permit, all the information you have provided in the process of applying for a permit remains private, with the exception of your name and your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about you are available only to the following: Board members, staff of the Board whose work assignment requires that they have access to the information; the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, the Minnesota Attorney General; the Minnesota Commissioners of Administration, Finance, and Revenue; the Minnesota Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies that are specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this Notice was given; and anyone with your consent. Application for Exempt Permit - LG220 Organization Name Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment If the gambling premises is within city limits, the city must sign this application. On behalf of the city, I acknowledge this application. Check the action that the city is taking on this application. ❑ The city approves the application with no waiting period. ❑The city approves the application with a 30 day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a first class city). ID The city denies the application. Print name of city _ (Signature of city personnel receiving application) Title Date //_ Page 2 of 2 8/00 If the gambling premises is located in a township, both the county and township must sign this application. On behalf of the county, I acknowledge this application. Check the action that the county is taking on this application. ❑ The county approves the application with no waiting period. ElThe county approves the application with a 30 day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. ElThe county denies the application. Print name of county (Signature of county personnel receiving application) Title Date- /--- - - / - -- TOWNSHIP: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. [A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application (Minn. Stat. sec. 349.213, subd. 2).] Print name of township (Signature of township official acknowledging application) Title Date— _— / - -__/ Chief Executive Officer's Signature The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Chief executive officer's signature Name (please print) Pj IAJ Date__ I _I ? &l Mail Application and Attachments At least 45 days prior to your scheduled activity date send: • the completed application, • a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and • a $25 application fee (make check payable to "State of Minnesota "). Application fees are not prorated, refundable, or transferable. Send to: Gambling Control Board 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South Roseville, MN 55113 If your application has not been acknowledged by the local unit of government or has been denied, do not send the application to the Gambling Control Board. CONSENT AGENDA 11 STAFF ORIGINATOR Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk MEETING DATE February 12, 2001 TOPIC Resolution No. 01 -23 Consider Renewal of Gambling License for Centennial Youth Hockey Shirley Kayes. BACKGROUND: The Centennial Youth Hockey Association has been conducting pull -tab gambling at Shirley Kaye's since July, 1994. They are asking that their license be renewed as of April 1, 2001. Licenses are now issued for a two -(2) year period. All reports and gambling taxes have been paid as required by the City Gambling Ordinance. All net proceeds from this gambling operation are used to support the Centennial Youth Hockey program. This organization meets all requirements of the Gambling Ordinance and I recommended that the City Council approve the gambling license renewal application. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 01 -23, Application for Renewal of the Gambling License. 2. Deny Resolution No, 01 -23, Application for Renewal of the Gambling License. 3. Refer to staff for further review RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1: Approve Resolution 01 -23 the application for renewal of the gambling license. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01- 23 PREMISES PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR LAWFUL GAMBLNG AT SHIRLEY KAYES OF LINO LAKES. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes met at its regularly scheduled meeting of February 12, 2001, and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council discussed lawful gambling at Shirley Kayes and Centennial Hockey Association to conduct gambling at 6810 7868 Lake Drive, Lino Lakes, and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has conducted an investigation of Shirley Kayes; and WHEREAS, Shirley Kayes and Centennial Youth Hockey is in compliance with City Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Centennial Youth Association and Shirley Kayes appears to take into consideration the best interest of the City of Lino Lakes; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the Renewal Premises Permit Application for the Centennial Youth Association at Shirley Kayes of Lino Lakes. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 28th day of February 2000. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. State of Minnesota Gambling Control Board Premises Permit Renewal Application LG214PPR Printed: 9/282000 For Board Use Only Amt. Pd Check # Date License Number: B- 03934 -003 Effective Date: 4/1/1999 Expiration Date: 3/31/2001 Name of Organization: Hockey Circle Pines Centennial Youth Assoc Gambling Premises Information Name of the establishment where gambling will be conducted Shirley Kayes 6810 Lake Dr Lino Lakes, MN 55014 County: Anoka Note: Our records show the premises is located within the city limits Shirley Moore 6810 Lake Dr Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Name of the property owner (If different): Lessor Information Square footage leased per month: Rent paid per month: Square footage leased per bingo occasion: Rent paid per bingo occasion: 30 1,000 Bingo Activity Our records indicate that Bingo is not conducted on these premises. ARE' F-RO i�'R G Storage Information 99112U />1 �.., s�t- E 3S b) Twin City Federal 1059 Meadowlands Dr White Bear Lake, MN 55127 Bank Information Gambling Bank Account Number: 5851499148 On the lines provided below list the name, address and title of at least two persons authorized to sign checks and make deposits and withdrawals for the gambling account. The organization's treasurer may not handle gambling funds. Name Address City, State, Zip Code Title %hhk, 6C1Y0o‹ is( c%nSri4,J,' -- L,),N)L) 1.4, - cc lti ga el) 4:9 GEo Ci411✓ ./'14 Rio V 'di() L.i 'Qj `iulik, 04- C P1024-- 24-- sU /y cht 0;:n j l/ mm V L./PS L= S 3(,( LlS L r% . L1,-,i0 141/:e4v (,11"-I 3c ep (Be sure to complete the reverse side of this application) This form will be made available in alternative format (ie. large print, braille) upon request. Page 1 of 2 (Continued on Back) Acknowledgment Page 2 of 2 Gambling Site Authorization I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers, the board or agents of the board, or the commissioner of revenue or public safety or agents of the commissioners, may enter the premises to enforce the law. Bank Records Information The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of the gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill requirements of current gambling rules and law. Organization License Authorization I hereby authorize the Gambling Control Board to modify the class of organization license to be consistent with the class of pennit being applied for. 0 I 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ath declare that: I have read this application and all information submitted to the board is true, accurate, and complete; all other required information has been fully disclosed; I am the chief executive officer of the organization; I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of all activities to be conducted; I will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments to them; 6. any changes in application information will be submitted to the board and local unit of govemment within ten days of the change; and 7. I understand that failure to provide required information or providing false or misleading information may result in the denial or revocation of the license/ ignature of th chie exec A e officer (Designee may not sign) Local Unit of Government Acknowled • ment and Ai • royal On behalf of the city, I hereby acknowledge this application for lawful gambling activity at the premises located within the city's jurisdiction, and that a resolution specifically approving or denying the application will be forwarded to the applying organization. Print name of city Signature of city personnel receiving application Title Date For the township: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying to conduct lawful gambling activity within the township limits. A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application (Minn. Stat. sec. 349.213, subd. 2). fEE Print name of township Signature of township official receiving application Title Date For the county: On behalf of the county, I hereby acknowledge this application for lawful gambling activity at the premises located within the county's jurisdiction, and that a resolution specifically approving or denying the application will be forwarded to the applying organization. Print name of county Signature of county personnel receiving application Title Date The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota, and to assist the Board in conducting a background investigation of you. You have the right to refuse to supply the information requested; however, if you refuse to supply this infonnation, the Board may not be able to determine your qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue you a license. If you supply the information requested, the Board will be able to process your application. Your name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All the other infonnation that you provide will be private data about you until the Board issues your license. When the Board issues your license, all of the information that you have provided to the Board in the process of applying for your license will become public. If the Board does not issue you a license, all the information you have provided in the process of applying for a license remains private, with the exception of your name and address which will remain public. Private data about you are available only to the following: Board members, staff of the Board whose work assignment requires that they have access to the information; the Minnesota Department of Public Safety; the Minnesota Attorney General; the Minnesota Commissioners of Administration, Finance, and Revenue; the Minnesota Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order, other individuals and agencies that are specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this notice was given; and AGENDA ITEM NO. 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 12, 2001 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution 01 -20, Consideration of Submitting Outdoor Recreation Grant Application VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) operates several financial assistance programs. The purpose of the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program is to increase and enhance outdoor recreation facilities. Eligible projects are for park acquisition and /or development/re- development including picnic shelters, playgrounds, athletic facilities, trails, boat accesses, fishing piers, swimming beaches, campgrounds, and others. This program is for cities, counties and townships. The Outdoor Recreation Grant Program is a very competitive program with hundreds of grant applications submitted annually. Projects selected to receive a grant receive assistance of up to 50 percent of total eligible costs. The City Council recently authorized staff to submit an application in the amount of $125,000 for the development of Clearwater Creek Park. As part of the application process, a Public Hearing is required to obtain citizen input on the proposed Outdoor Recreation Grant Application. Resolution 01 -20 authorizes staff to submit an Outdoor Recreation Grant application, and authorizes myself to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution 01 -20. 2. Do not approve Resolution 01 -20. 3. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 2/5/01 RD /DNR grant/greensheet public hearing Council Member its adoption. introduced the following resolution and moved CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION 01 -20 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CLEARWATER CREEK PARK BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Lino Lakes act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Application to be submitted on March 28, 2001 and that the Public Services Director is hearby authorized to apply to the Department of Natural Resources for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lino Lakes has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lino Lakes has not incurred any costs described on Item 4 and has not entered into any written agreements to purchase property described on Item 3. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lino Lakes has not violated any Federal, State, or Local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Lino Lakes may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above - referenced project, and that the City of Lino Lakes certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Rick DeGardner is hearby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes on February 12, 2001. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM 4A STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 12, 2001 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution No. 01 -05, Proposed Utility rates for 2001 -2003 (CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 26, 2001) VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required to Continue BACKGROUND: City finance and engineering staff have brought additional information to the City Council for consideration. We also need to allow time such that the proposed rates can be published in the legal newspaper prior to action by the City Council. OPTIONS: 1. Continue the Public Hearing. 2. Close the Public Hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 - Staff recommends continuing the Public Hearing. AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 12 February 2001 SUBJECT Term Extension for Cable Franchise Agreement. VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND The cable television franchise under which AT &T Broadband is currently operating will expire on 28 February 2001. While our negotiating team is making progress, the franchise document itself will not be completed by 28 February. Approval of the attached resolution will extend the franchise 90 days. I will present the new franchise agreement for your approval when negotiations are completed. OPTIONS 1. Approve the attached resolution extending the franchise agreement with AT &T Broadband. 2. Not approving the agreement would leave us without a contract with our cable TV provider. RECOMMENDATION One. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA RESOLUTION NO. 01-25 A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE TERM OF THE CABLE FRANCHISE GRANTED TO MEDIAONE NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS CORP. D/B /A AT &T BROADBAND WHEREAS, the member cities of the North Metro Telecommunications Commission (the "Authority ") granted nonexclusive cable television franchises (the "Franchises ") to MediaOne North Central Communications Corp. d/b /a AT &T Broadband; and WHEREAS, the Franchise was transferred to AT &T Broadband ( "AT &T ") effective June, 2000; and WHEREAS, unless sooner renewed or extended, the Franchise will expire on February 28, 2001; and WHEREAS, AT &T has requested a renewal of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, the Authority and AT &T are currently negotiating the terms of a renewal of the Franchise pursuant to the informal renewal process set forth in Section 626(h) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 546(h); and WHEREAS, the Authority desires to extend the term of the Franchise from February 28, 2001, to May 28, 2001, so that negotiations may continue; and WHEREAS, AT &T has consented and agreed to the terms of this extension. NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES that: 1. The term of the Franchise shall be extended from February 28, 2001, until May 28, 2001, unless sooner revoked, cancelled or terminated. 2. All terms and conditions of the Franchise, as may be amended from time to time, shall remain in effect during the term of the extension. 3. This extension shall not constitute a waiver of any rights the Authority or MediaOne may have under (i) the Franchise, as it may be amended from time to time; (ii) the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (iii) Chapter 238 of the Minnesota Statutes, Minn. Stat. § 238.01, et seq.; or (iv) any other law or regulation. 4. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to give AT &T additional rights or opportunities to trigger the provisions of 47 U.S.C. § 546(a) -(g), or to require the North. Metro Telecommunications Commission to conduct or reconduct hearings or other actions properly taken in conjunction with any renewal proceedings under the current Franchise. 5. No claim that either party may have against the other shall be released or otherwise affected by this extension. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of February, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Accepted by AT &T this day of , 2001: By: Title AGENDA ITEM 5B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator MEETING DATE: February 12, 2001 TOPIC: Consider Approval of AFSCME Contract for 2001 VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: Negotiation of a proposed 2001 labor contract with the AFSCME bargaining unit has been completed. The union membership voted to ratify the proposed contract last week. The city council needs to ratify it before it can be adopted. Changes from the previous contract include: 1. A three percent cost of living adjustment, retroactive to January 1, 2001. 2. Inclusion of two additional positions (actually existing positions that were re- classified based on current duties): Office Manager- Public Services and Accounting Clerk- Utility Billing/PC Technician. 3. Providing a uniform allowance for the two Building Inspectors and one Environmental Specialist ($355 annually, the same as the Local 49 contract provision). 4. Market adjustments to three positions: Secretary C, 2 %; Senior Coordinator, 4 %; Community Service Officer, 4 %. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the proposed 2001 labor contract with AFSCME. 2. Decline to approve the 2001 labor contract with AFSCME. 3. Return to staff for further review and/or action. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Option #1: Approve the proposed 2001 labor contract with AFSCME. STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED INTRODUCTION AGENDA ITEM 6A DAVID J. PECCHIA, PUBLIC SAFEY DIRECTOR /CHIEF OF POLICE February 12, 2001 CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION No. 012+ TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR T1 ACCESS CIRCUIT AND SUPPORTED TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 3/5 The Lino Lakes Police Department has accepted installation of a T1 access circuit from the State of Minnesota to meet the needs of criminal justice communications between our department and the State. This circuit also provides the wide area network connection for the Anoka County Central Records Project. The State is requesting that the City enter into a joint powers agreement to document and clarify this cooperative effort. DISCUSSION The Lino Lakes Police Department has been involved in a cooperative effort with other Anoka County law enforcement agencies to centralize their police records systems. In order to facilitate the sharing of information it was necessary to install wide area network equipment and access circuits. Initially it was anticipated that the cost of installing the wide area network would be borne by the individual cities. As the Central Records Project progressed an opportunity became available to partner with the State to pilot the implementation of the new, State funded, Criminal Justice Data Network (CJDN). The CJDN will eventually provide high speed data access to every police department in the State of Minnesota. As a part of the CJDN project the State provided the T1 access circuit and necessary network hardware and allowed our department to add additional bandwidth to meet the needs of our Central Records Project. This arrangement will save the police department approximately $200 per month on our wide area network connection to the other police departments in Anoka County. ACTION REQUESTED Staff requests that Council approve Resolution 01- authorizing the execution and delivery of a Joint Powers Agreement relating to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Criminal Justice Data Communications Network. OPTIONS 1. APPROVE RECOMMENDATION. 2. RETURN TO STAFF FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION RECOMMENDATION 1. APPROVE Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 24 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT Be it resolved that the City of Lino Lakes enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Technical Support Services for the T1 access circuit, a defined level of backbone bandwidth, and supported telecommunication equipment which includes (modem, DSU /CSU, and router) . I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes on February 12, 2001. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad/CMC, City Clerk - Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CRIMINAL JUSTICE DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AGREEMENT (DISTRIBUTION OF NETWORK SERVICES TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES) Contract # THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, by and between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Public Safety. Office of Technical Support Services (hereinafter referred to as the STATE) and the City of Lino Lakes Police Department, 640 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, MN 55014, (hereinafter referred to as GOVERNMENTAL UNIT) witness that: WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 2990.46, Subdivision 1 is authorized to lease or purchase facilities and equipment as may be necessary to establish and maintain the data communications network with criminal justice agencies, and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute, Chapter 299C. 46, Subdivision 2 defines criminal justice agencies allowed to connect to the criminal justice data communications network, and WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Laws of Minnesota for 1999, Chapter 216, Article 1, Section 7, Subdivision 3 is appropriated funds for the statewide criminal and juvenile justice data information system upgrade; and WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Laws of Minnesota for 2000, Chapter 311, Article 1, Section 3 is appropriated funds for criminal justice technology infrastructure; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subdivision 10 authorizes both the STATE and the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT to enter into joint powers agreements, and, WHEREAS, the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT represents that it meets all requirements for this Agreement as a criminal justice agency, or is a city, county, or political subdivision participating on criminal justice communications network authorized to accept network services from the STATE for the purpose specified herein, and WHEREAS, the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform and carry out the services and tasks described in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed: I. SERVICE OPTIONS Criminal justice agencies may select either option A or B below. Cities, counties, or political subdivisions may only select option A. Service option checked below applies to this Agreement: A. X The STATE's base installation is a T1 access circuit, a defined level of backbone bandwidth, and supported telecommunication equipment which includes (modem, DSU /CSU, and router). The total cost of the network connection will be computed based on the combined requirements of the STATE and the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT for backbone bandwidth, supported telecommunication equipment with appropriate ports, access circuit, and installation. The STATE will pay what they would have paid for the base installation, as specified in Clause II of this agreement, and the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT through a service agreement with the Minnesota Department of Administration Intertechnologies Group (ITG) will pay the difference. This will include an additional PVC or an increase in the base bandwidth, an appropriate level of Community Router Service, and may include an additional router port. CJDN traffic will have priority routing. Either party to this Agreement can expand their bandwidth within the available bandwidth, but if a conflict in bandwidth needs occurs, then the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT PAGE 1 of 4 will order another access circuit from ITG for their use at the prevailing rates. The same telecommunications equipment can be used. OR B. __ GOVERNMENTAL UNITS wants to utilize available CJDN bandwidth. If the expected bandwidth requirements by the GOVERMENTAL UNIT are low, the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT can utilize some of the available bandwidth within the planned network. The GOVERNMENTAL UNIT must obtain the STATE's approval in advance for each type of service that they want to use. The only cost of this option to the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT will be for an additional router port, if it were needed in order to segregate the CJDN traffic and establish the required separate segment. CJDN traffic will have priority routing and if the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT experiences bandwidth congestion (response time), then the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT can acquire additional bandwidth, if available, on the existing circuit or the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT can acquire another circuit connection through InterTech. The same installed router can still be used. II. STATE'S RESPONSIBILITIES A. The STATE shall, by the nature of the location of the GOVERNMENTAL UNITS that it serves, cause the Minnesota Network (MNet) to be extended to more locations throughout the state. This provides an opportunity for GOVERNMENTAL UNITS to partner with the STATE and ITG to more fully utilize the planned network connections and increase connectivity between public sector organizations. B. Wherever feasible, the STATE shall use current MNet digital network connections to connect to participating agencies for the purposes of criminal justice access. If a GOVERNMENTAL UNIT does not have a current MNet connection or it is inadequate for the application, the Criminal Justice Data Communications Network (CJDN) Upgrade Project will bring routed connectivity to that site. C. The STATE, through ITG, will coordinate and pay the telephone company for the initial inside (premium) wiring service at the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT's site, not to exceed $200.00. This cost is limited to the wiring from the Main Point of Presence (MPOP) in the facility to the STATE provided router, unless otherwise specified within this agreement. D. The STATE, through ITG, will determine the bandwidth requirement for the CJDN applications at each site and will coordinate and pay the telephone company for the initial installation of the circuit required to support that bandwidth. E. The STATE, through ITG, will coordinate and pay the telephone company for the initial installation and monthly cost of the circuit located at the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT's site. F. The STATE, through ITG, will coordinate and pay for the initial activation, support, and maintenance of one router port on the MNet router located at the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT's site. If an additional port is required, the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT will be required to pick up the monthly charge. Access Control Lists (ACL) for the connection to the STATE will be maintained by ITG with the approval of the STATE. G. The ITG will ensure that a separate, and dedicated, modem line is installed at the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT's site for the express purpose of monitoring the ITG owned and maintained MNet router. H. The STATE, through ITG, will maintain the Access Control Lists (ACL) on the MNet routers for PAGE 2 of 4 connection to the STATE for the purpose of gaining access to criminal justice information. The ITG will bill the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT its appropriate share of the costs depending on service options and /or service agreements entered into between the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT and ITG. III. GOVERNMENTAL UNIT'S RESPONSIBILITIES GOVERNMENTAL UNIT receiving equipment and /or services under this Agreement must: A. If a circuit is to be installed, the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT shall grant access to the facility main point of presence (MPOP) for the telephone company installer to install the circuit. B. The GOVERNMENTAL UNIT shall indicate to the telephone company installer where the MNet router is located or will be installed within the facility (this is premium wiring). C. Following the initial premium wiring, the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT shall be responsible for any and all costs of installing, repairing or replacing internal wiring in support of their criminal justice data communications network connection. Further, the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT will be responsible for any cost associated with damaged wiring due to relocations, misuse, or abuse. D. The GOVERNMENTAL UNIT shall report to the STATE any plans to relocate their offices that would impact their criminal justice data communications network connection. A minimum of 120 days notice is required to ensure uninterrupted service for circuit moves. In all cases, the relocation costs are the responsibility of the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT. E. The GOVERNMENTAL UNIT shall provide and maintain any disposable and consumable components originally provided by the STATE, and shall supply all other necessary disposable and consumable components not provided by the STATE at the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT's expense. F. The GOVERNMENTAL UNIT shall properly dispose of any and all state provided internal wiring when it is no longer operational or needed for connectivity to the criminal justice data communications network. G. If an additional port is required, the GOVERNMENT UNIT will be required to pick up the monthly charge. Access Control Lists (ACL) for the connection to the STATE will be maintained by ITG with the approval of the STATE. H. The GOVERNMENTAL UNIT is required to sign a Service Agreement with ITG if they selected Option A of this Agreement. IV. TERMS OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be effective on February 12, 2001, or upon the date that the final required signature is obtained by the STATE, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 16C.05, Subdivision. 2, whichever occurs later, and shall remain in effect until , or until all obligations set forth in this Agreement have been satisfactorily fulfilled or the Agreement has been canceled, whichever happens first. V. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by either the STATE or GOVERNMENTAL UNIT at any time, with or without cause, upon ten (10) days written notice to the other party. VI. STATE'S AUTHORIZED AGENT The STATE's authorized agent for the purposes of this Agreement is Robert P. Johnson, or his designee, Department of Public Safety, Office of Technical Support Services, 444 Minnesota Street, Suite 140, Town Square, St. Paul, MN 55101 -5140. Such agent shall have final authority for acceptance of the PAGE 3 of 4 GOVERNMENTAL UNIT's services. VII. ASSIGNMENT GOVERNMENTAL UNIT shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent from the STATE. VIII. LIABILITY The GOVERNMENTAL UNIT shall indemnify, save and hold the STATE, its representatives and employees, harmless from any and all claims or causes of action, including all attorneys' fees incurred by the STATE, arising from the performance of this Agreement by the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT or GOVERNMENTAL UNIT's employees, agents, or subcontractors. This clause shall not be construed to bar any legal remedies the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT may have for the STATE's failure to fulfill its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. The GOVERNMENTAL UNIT's liability shall be governed by the provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.01- 466.15 and other applicable law. IX. STATE AUDIT The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT and its employees, agents or subcontractors relevant to this Agreement shall be made available and subject to examination by the STATE, including the contracting Agency /Division, Legislative Auditor, and State Auditor for a minimum period of six years from the end of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed intending to be bound thereby. APPROVED 1. GOVERNMENTAL UNIT 2. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY By: Title: John Bergeson, Mayor Date: February 12, 2001 By: Title: Date By: Title: Linda Waite- Smith, City Administrator Date February 12, 2001 4. ATTORNEY GENERAL 3. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Approved to sign on behalf of the Attorney General as to By: form and execution: Date: By: Date: Person(s) sianina the Agreement and nhlinating the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT to the conditions of the a r t t g eemen mus be authorized. A certified copy of the resolution authorizing the GOVERNMENTAL UNIT to enter into this Agreement and designating person(s) to execute this Agreement must be attached hereto. PAGE 4 of 4 AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR David J Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE February 12, 2001 TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED BACKGROUND Accept Resignation of Officer Travis Muyres 3/5 Officer Travis Muyres has submitted a letter of resignation from the Lino Lakes Police Department citing his pursuit of other employment. He has accepted a position with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) as a conservation officer. I am requesting the City Council accept Officer Muyres' resignation and wish him well in his future endeavors. We anticipate beginning a selection process as soon as possible to replace the vacancy created by this resignation. , OPTIONS 1. Accept resignation 2. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION 1. Accept resignation Department of Public Safety POLICE David J. Pecchia Public Safety Director / Chief of Police Chief Peccia, 02 -01 -01 This letter is regarding my resignation from my position as a Police Officer for the Lino Lakes Police Department. As discussed earlier today on the telephone I have received a job offer from the MN Department of Natural Resources. I accepted to position of Conservation Officer with that agency. I will be starting the DNR training academy on 02- 14 -01. I will treasure the experiences and memories that I had the opportunity to obtain in fulfilling the role as a police officer in this department. I would like to thank you and all of the staff for giving me a chance to fulfill my dreams. Thank You, Travis Muyres 640 Town Center Parkway -' Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Public :Administration /Records: 651- 932 -2300 Fax: 551 -982-2399 AGENDA ITEM 7A STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 12, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -27, Approve Payment No. 3 (Final) and Change Order No. 2, 2000 Wear Course and Trail Paving Project VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: The Contractor for the 2000 Wear Course and Trail Paving Project is requesting City approval of Payment No. 3 (Final) in the amount of $25,431.25. The project included the paving of certain trails throughout the City and wear course paving was done in new developments. The final payment is determined as follows: Original Contract Amount $121,099.25 Change Order No. 1 $ 0.00 Change Order No. 2 $ 25,431.25 Change Order No. 3 (Quantity Adjustment) $ 33,330.81 Contract Amount to Date $179,861.31 Payments to Date $154,430.06 Final Payment Amount $25,431.25 The only item included in the Payment No. 3 (Final) is Change Order No. 2, which was shown as pending in Payment No. 2. Change Order No. 2 consists of the following items: 1. Additional trail was added between the Palomino cul -de -sacs in the Behm's Century Farm 2nd & 3rd Additions. 2. Twenty -five infi - shields were needed because the existing infi - shields could not cover all of the adjustment rings once the manholes were raised to the final elevation of the street. 3. It was necessary to pave a leveling course in the Pheasant Hills Preserve 7th and 8th Additions because the existing base course had settled and $8,412.95 $4,187.50 the wear course could not be paved thick enough to get the street up to the proper elevation. $9,956.00 4. In 1999, at the request of several residents, a portion of Pheasant Hills Preserve 7th Addition was paved to provide a smooth transition to driveways until the wear course could be paved the following year. This area had to be milled for the placement of the wear course. $2,874.80 TOTAL COST $25,431.25 Those portions of the above additional costs that are related to specific subdivisions will be charged to the subdivision. The quantity of work has been verified by the City's Resident Project Representative and accurately represents the materials, labor, and work tasks completed. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Approve Resolution 01 -27 approving Payment No. 3 (final) and Change Order No. 2 for the 2000 Wear Course and Trail Paving Project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 — Staff recommends that Resolution 01 -27 be approved. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -27 RESOLUTION APPROVING PAYMENT 3 (FINAL) FOR THE 2000 WEAR COURSE AND TRAIL PAVING PROJECT WHEREAS, the construction of the 2000 Wear Course and Trail Paving Project has been completed by North Valley, Inc., and; WHEREAS, the one -year warranty period for this project will begin with the final payment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Payment Number 3 (final) in the amount of $25,431.25 is approved for a total contract amount of $179,861.31. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of February, 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on February 12, 2001. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: DESCRIPTION: AGENDA ITEM 7 B Mary Kay Wyland February 12, 2001 Minor Subdivision, Outlot A & B and Lot 8, Block 1, and Lot 8, Block 2, Reshanau Park Estates 2 "d Addition Resolution No. 01 -11, 12,13, &14 Simple Majority Over the past few years, City Staff has been working with the Reshanau Park Estates Homeowners Association (RPEHA), the private property owners adjacent to Outlot B and Anoka County Parks on development of a trail around the north end of Reshanau Lake. After much concentrated effort it seems likely that a resolution has been reached. The City, property owners and the RPEHA have agreed to a proposal that provides this trail segment. A 15' wide park trail will begin at the north end of Black Duck Drive, through two residential lots, proceed through Outlots A and B (connecting with the Anoka County Park trail). The trail will include a larger triangular parcel at the north end of Outlot A (see attached color coded map) which will avoid segmenting the outlot with the trail. To facilitate this agreement, minor subdivisions are required to adequately define and record this trail segment. The attached drawing outlines the areas to be subdivided as follows: Pink area - from Lot 8, Block 1, (Kuzel property) Green area - from Lot 8, Block 2, (Schut property) Blue area - Outlots A & B (RPEHA property) The Park Board has reviewed this request and recommended approval. The City Council has agreed to the land purchase(s). The City Attorney has drafted the appropriate purchase agreements based on legal descriptions provided. Park Dedication funds will be used for the trail purchase and construction. The properties in question are Zoned R-1X and indicated as single family on the Land Use Map, current and draft. Subdividing the properties as indicated will not affect the square foot lot requirement of any of the parcels. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their January meeting and recommended approval with the conditions outlined below. The P & Z added conditions 6 &7. 1. The city will assure perpetual access for the RPEHA to its outlots, including vehicular access to the boat ramp. 2. Signage will be placed at the trailheads indicating that only authorized vehicles are permitted. 3. The city will relieve the Association of its obligations with respect to the Easement and Option Agreement with the Schut's and the Easement Agreement with the Kuzel's. 4. The RPEHA will be responsible for any desired fencing along the proposed path. 5. The City shall record the minor subdivision with Anoka County. 6. Prior to constructing any fencing, the RPEHA must receive City approval. 7. Signs shall be installed indicating "public trail ". The City Attorney reviewed the conditions which will be contained within the purchase agreement for the proeprty. OPTIONS: 1. Approve minor subdivision as outlined above by adopting Resolution 01 -11, 12, 13, & 14. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 GEORGE WATCH LAKE CENTERVILLE .SNE1001 E• . If 20 � o Lie ,� pg; � `pc a l oke m pp V iVt dpi OD ,. IIR n 1« ` � Q° 0 6 ;� °ate'' 1 ;P` ` n dtt na !rin'E = ' • a o 5 � ja 40 so ea SAO o CCU fl Gana sp an oab nM Ego 7] GEORGE WATCH LAKE CENTERVILLE shigNaAt E. ad T. T LK XI AMNIA “4011.1 WM= tl -EMI °Mal Irin, Vamiss2 ir4,41al 4 . any to>, , us nu ILL L la Num° e. n tivererit 14 AO -,40 amT7-`thil-qiirl ,,, Vs rgi N'O'V*113/ #1'""4"rN ltEIMICRL ar/It eagraP-02\" .-giiiip4P419 =Mir ke , A• gw- Vilna imitisifiAava• ink4ns 3 oar,AW 4) ru 1 • ,0, Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-11 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF LOT 8 BLOCK 1 RESHANAU PARK ESTATES, 2ND ADDITION TO PROVIDE FOR A PUBLIC TRAIL WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has determined it is in the public interest to provide a public trail corridor to connect Black Duck Drive to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve, and WHEREAS, the City and the owner of Lot 8 Block 1 Reshanau Park Estates 2nd Addition have agreed on terms for the City's acquisition of land for part of the public trail corridor, and WHEREAS, the land for the trail corridor is described on the attached legal description and survey (see attached), NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the minor subdivision of Lot 8 Block 1 Reshanau Park Estates 2nd Addition as described. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of January, 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-12 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF LOT 8 BLOCK 2 RESHANAU PARK ESTATES, 2ND ADDITION TO PROVIDE FOR A PUBLIC TRAIL WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has determined it is in the public interest to provide a public trail corridor to connect Black Duck Drive to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve, and WHEREAS, the City and the owner of Lot 8 Block 2 Reshanau Park Estates 2nd Addition have agreed on terms for the City's acquisition of land for part of the public trail corridor, and WHEREAS, the land for the trail corridor is described on the attached legal description and survey (see attached), NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the minor subdivision of Lot 8 Block 2 Reshanau Park Estates 2nd Addition as described. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of January, 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-13 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF OUTLOT A, RESHANAU PARK ESTATES, 2ND ADDITION TO PROVIDE FOR A PUBLIC TRAIL WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has determined it is in the public interest to provide a public trail corridor to connect Black Duck Drive to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve, and WHEREAS, the City and the owner of Outlot A, Reshanau Park Estates 2nd Addition have agreed on terms for the City's acquisition of land for part of the public trail corridor, and WHEREAS, the land for the trail corridor is described on the attached legal description and survey (see attached), NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the minor subdivision of Outlot A, Reshanau Park Estates 2nd Addition as described. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of January, 2001 ATTEST: John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-14 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF OUTLOT B, RESHANAU PARK ESTATES, 2ND ADDITION TO PROVIDE FOR A PUBLIC TRAIL WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has determined it is in the public interest to provide a public trail corridor to connect Black Duck Drive to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve, and WHEREAS, the City and the owner of Outlot B, Reshanau Park Estates 2nd Addition have agreed on terms for the City's acquisition of land for part of the public trail corridor, and WHEREAS, the land for the trail corridor is described on the attached legal description and survey (see attached), NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the minor subdivision of Outlot B, Reshanau Park Estates 2nd Addition as described. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of January, 2001 ATTEST: John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. 4'POSTS W /CABLE PRIVATE PROPERTY SIGN 1070.95 S.F. 15 4'POSTS W /CABLE EX. TRAIL ■ 5819.21 S.F. ■ EX. HORSE SHOE PITS 697.74 S.F. ■ Q EX. TRAIL — (\0c EX. SAN. MH (LOC. APPROX.) 1.72 S.F. PRIVATE PROPERTY SIGN oL R2s\vct_t.icA ■ c GZ.1;o+ .cc 1(w".. EX. ORNAMENTAL BLOCK RET. WALL 5 s RESH) LINO LA COMM. NO. 12/1/00 k FIELD BOON AGENDA ITEM 7 C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland MEETING DATE: City Council — February 12, 2001 TOPIC: Circle -Lex VFW — Extension of CUP VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority DESCRIPTION: The Circle Lex VFW received approval of a Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit on April 26, 1999 to allow the expansion of their existing facility at 7868 Lake Drive. According to the Zoning Ordinance, both the Site Plan Review section and the Conditional Use Permit section have specific reference to initiation of the project and expiration of the permit. Those sections are as follows: And "If construction has not begun within one (1) year after the date of the conditional use permit, or if substantial construction has not taken place within three (3) years after the date of issuance of the conditional use permit, the permit is void. A conditional use specified in the permit expires if, for any reason, the authorized use ceases for more than one year." "Activities authorized by site and building plan approval shall be initiated within six (6) months. If such activity is not completed within eighteen (18) months, the site approval shall no longer be in effect, and application and approval of site and building plans shall be required." At this time, the Circle Lex VFW would like to extend both their Site Plan Review and CUP. They have indicated, via Post Commander Dean Johnson, that a tentative construction date is set for the summer of 2001. Staff would advise Council that in April of 2001 this CUP approval will be two years old. If the Circle Lex VFW is certain construction will begin this spring, we would recommend approval of an extension until year end 2001. If construction is still questionable, Council must consider a longer extension or require a new review when construction is eminent. OPTIONS: 1. Grant extension of Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit to December 31, 2001 2. Grant extension of Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit to 3. Deny extension of Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 VFW Post 6583 Dean Johnson - Commander 7868 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Mobil 612 770 -0135 City of Lino Lakes City Council RE: Expansion of the VFW Post 6583, 7868 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 We at the VFW ask that the City Council consider an extension of time on the conditional use permit previously approved. Tentative construction date is summer of 2001. Sincerely, Dean Johnson Commander — Post 6583 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION No. 2001 -26 RESOLUTION EXTENDING SITE PLAN REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CIRCLE LEX VFW 7868 Lake Drive WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for an extension of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for the Circle Lex VFW at 7868 Lake Drive originally granted on April 26, 1999. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes reviewed the request and found it to be reasonable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit granted to the Circle Lex VFW on April 26, 1999 is hereby extended to December 31, 2001 at which time the permit shall become null and void according to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes if construction has not commenced. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of February 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CCM City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM 7 D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: February 12, 2001 TOPIC: • FIRST READING: Ordinance 01 -01 Rezoning Lot 13 Block 2 Sunset Oaks to R -1 • FIRST READING: Ordinance 02 -01 Amending Comprehensive Plan to Allocate 2.55 Acres of MUSA Reserve • Resolution 01 -06 Approving Preliminary Plat Behm's Farm Park Addition ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND 4/5 vote for rezoning ordinance 4/5 vote for MUSA ordinance 3/5 for preliminary plat resolution The applicant, Century Farms Development, has applied for a rezoning, an allocation of MUSA reserve acres, and a preliminary plat. The site is within the existing Behm's Park on the southwest corner of Mustang Lane and Palomino Lane. Behm's Park currently includes approximately 8.6 acres. The park area includes Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 2, Sunset Oaks. The City acquired these four lots for park purposes via warranty deed in December 1985 to fulfill park dedication for Sunset Oaks. The City rezoned Lots 14, 15, and 16 to R -1 in 1994 (Ordinance 15 -94). Lot 13, the southern portion of the park, was not included in the rezoning action. This likely was an oversight. In 1997, the City received approval from the Metropolitan Council to allow the City to use part of its MUSA reserve for the Behm's Century Farms development. The approved submittal map included Lots 14, 15, and 16, but did not include Lot 13. That is, the southern part of Behm's Park was not included in the area where MUSA can be applied. Again, probably an oversight. In 1999, the City Council authorized selling 2.55 acres of the park to G. M. Development for $75,000, which was to include grading improvements to the park (Ordinance 16 -99 and Resolution 99 -50). The intent was to allow for the creation of nine house lots. Proceeds of the sale of this land would be used to develop the park. However, there was no guarantee in the purchase agreement that the City would approve rezoning or development of the 2.55 acres. Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 2 Gary Uhde of G. M. Development has requested that the City allow him to follow through on his plan for developing the new lots. Staff discussed this with the City Council at a work session on 11/8/00 and Council directed staff to proceed. In order to proceed, three actions are needed: 1. Rezone Lot 13 Sunset Oaks to R -1 2. Allocate 2.55 acres of MUSA reserve to the area to be sold to the developer 3. Preliminary plat This report is based on the submittal consisting of the following: Preliminary Plat 12/11/00 submitted 12/11/00 Preliminary Grading Plan 4/18/00 submitted 12/11/00 Existing Conditions 12/11/00 submitted 12/11/00 ANALYSIS Land use and zoning for the site and surrounding land are listed in the following table. The site includes 8.6 acres with 2.55 acres to be platted as new house lots. The proposed plat would create 9 single family lots. The draft land use plan shows the site as Public Semi - Public. That map was created before the negotiations with the City over the land sale. The draft map can and should be amended to complete the land sale agreed to by the City in 1999. Rezoning Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the zoning ordinance states that the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors. Comprehensive Plan (existing) Comprehensive Plan (1998 draft) Zoning site Single Family Resid. Public /Semi - Public R -1 and Rural north Single Family Resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 east Single Family Resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 west Single Family Resid. Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural south Single Family Resid. Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural The site includes 8.6 acres with 2.55 acres to be platted as new house lots. The proposed plat would create 9 single family lots. The draft land use plan shows the site as Public Semi - Public. That map was created before the negotiations with the City over the land sale. The draft map can and should be amended to complete the land sale agreed to by the City in 1999. Rezoning Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the zoning ordinance states that the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors. Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 3 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The land use and zoning table shows that the proposed rezoning complies with these first two factors. The site and surroundings is guided for single family and park uses. Land immediately surrounding the new lots is already developed with single family homes. Parkland will remain on most of the site. The park acts as a buffer for the larger lot, unsewered homes to the west and south. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The proposal meets the zoning and platting requirements contained in City ordinances. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Existing utilities can handle the nine new lots. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The nine new homes will not cause negative impacts on the existing roads. Staff recommends finding that the project complies with the above factors. MUSA Policies As noted above, most of the site is within the area approved for the use of some MUSA reserve. The lower portion is not. However, only 0.5± acres is outside the approved area. Because this appears to be an oversight of the past, staff feels comfortable with this. In addition, most of the area approved for MUSA will remain as City parkland. The City's MUSA reserve can be allocated within approved areas at the City's discretion. Currently, the City has 29.2 acres in the reserve. This project would need 2.55 acres of MUSA reserve. Interim MUSA Reserve Criteria: The City has criteria for the allocation of the MUSA reserve. Application of Interim MUSA Reserve shall be subject to the following: Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 4 1. An application for MUSA Reserve shall be considered at time of Preliminary Plat Approval and allocated at time of Final Plat following completion of a development agreement and posting of financial guarantees. The request for MUSA is occurring concurrently with preliminary plat application. 2. The property in question shall be zoned R -1 or R -1X or a rezoning application be in process in conjunction with the preliminary plat. The rezoning request is occurring concurrently with the MUSA request. 3. The property in question must be immediately adjacent to existing MUSA. MUSA is directly across both Mustang and Palomino Lanes. 4. MUSA Reserve shall be allocated to net buildable acres. The net acreage for the nine lots is 2.55 acres, and that is the MUSA request. 5. Development of the property must be considered a natural utility extension. 6. Development of the property must be considered a natural extension of existing roadways. Utilities and roadways exist directly adjacent to the site. 7. Development of the property shall not adversely affect the health, welfare, and general safety of the community. 8. Development of the property shall be environmentally compatible with the surrounding area. There is no evidence of negative impacts to the community or environment. The wetland plan was approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. 9. Development of the property shall be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Park Plan. The revenue from developing the site into nine lots will provide funds to develop the park according to the Park Plan. 10. MUSA Reserve shall be allocated only to properties located within Sewer District 1, 4s, 6 and the Behm's Century Farms Development within Sewer District No.2. The site is almost entirely within the Behm's development as reviewed by the Met Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 5 Council, and would be completely in it if not for a past oversight. 11. Development of the property shall be consistent with the City's comprehensive Sewer and Water Plan. Utilities and roadways exist directly adjacent to the site. 12. The developer shall demonstrate a commitment to the community. This is one phase of the larger Behm's development area. 13. The proposed development shall comply with the City's Infill Policy as outlined by Resolution No. 92 -85. See below. 14. Roadways serving the proposed development shall be determined adequate to handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed development or a financial commitment shall be made by the developer to upgrade said roadways. Existing roads are adequate to handle traffic from nine new lots. Infill Policy: The City adopted Resolution 92 -85, a policy for the location of new development, also referred to as the "infill policy" (attached). This policy also includes criteria to be considered, which are summarized below: • All new developments must be located within the MUSA as established by the Comprehensive Plan. Allocation of MUSA acres from the MUSA reserve will fulfill this requirement. • All new developments must be analyzed for impact on utility and street system costs. • New development shall only be allowed if: a) The cost of utility and street extensions can be covered by immediate assessment, and b) The cost of operation and maintenance of the system will not exceed the normal costs, and c) An upfront payment or series of payments by the developer would offset any additional costs. Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 6 Utilities and streets exist to serve the new lots. Payments to support service to these lots will be addressed as with any development. Staff recommends finding that the project meets these criteria. Preliminary Plat Lots, Blocks: All the proposed lots comply with the minimum lot dimensions. The blocks will not be separated by roads. Rather, park trails between the platted blocks will provide access to the park. Natural Features: An existing ditch has been relocated as part of the drainage plan for the larger Behm's project. This ditch is classified as wetland. There is a small wetland on the southern portion of the site that is not being impacted. The impact plan was approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Native plantings have been planted inside the southern half of the trail loop. The northern portion is sodded, irrigated play area. Transportation, Roads, Access, Circulation: No new roads are proposed. Parks and Trails: The City agreed to sell the land to the developer in order to obtain funds to develop the park. As part of the land sale agreement, the developer has completed earthmoving work in the park. He also graded the trail and installed aggregate. The City has since paved the trail. Additional park dedication will be $6885 cash. Because of the unusual situation, staff and the developer negotiated for the cash dedication. Based on a typical cost of $27,000 per acre in Lino Lakes, and the 2.55 acres of new lots: $27,000 x 2.55 = $68,850. The typical City park dedication of 10% calculates out to $6885. Some discussion occurred at the public hearing about trail access to the site. Behm's 5th Addition to the east across Mustang Lane originally had a trail leading to Mustang Lane. However, residents protested that trail location, so it was not constructed all the way to Mustang. Stormwater Management: As noted above, the ditch across the northern portion of the park has been realigned somewhat as part of an approved plan. Grading and stormwater management for this area was reviewed with previous Behm's Century Farms development. The grading plan for the new lots will meet City requirements. Utilities: Sewer and water are available both in Mustang Lane and Palomino Lane. Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 7 Conditions of Approval of Preliminary Plat: Resolution 01 -06 approves the preliminary plat. Three conditions of approval are included in the resolution: 1. Ordinance 01 -01 must be in effect (30 days after publication) before the final plat can be recorded. 2. Ordinance 02 -01 must be in effect (30 days after publication) before the final plat can be recorded. 3. The developer must notify purchasers of residential lots of the existence of the nearby Lino Air Park. The developer must provide to the City a copy of the notification format to be used before final plat approval by the City. PARK BOARD RECOMMENDATION The Park Board discussed this project at its January 4 meeting. The Board was glad this project is in progress in order to complete the agreement and develop the park. The Park Board is satisfied with the additional cash park dedication. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD RECOMMENDATION The Environmental Board discussed this project at its January 3 meeting. That Board recommends additional native plantings behind the Mustang Lane lots and notification of the need for periodic burning of the plantings. Staff believes the existing native plantings are sufficient. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD The P & Z reviewed the applications on January 10, 2001. The P & Z approved the rezoning, MUSA allocation, and preliminary plat. One condition was added to the plat: that the purchasers of the lots are notified of the existence of the air park. SALE OF LAND As explained above, the land currently is zoned Rural, with a 10 -acre minimum. Until the land is rezoned, no lots smaller than that can be created. This means that the nine lots making up 2.55 acres of land cannot be created until the rezoning is effective. Therefore, the City cannot sell the land to Century Farms Development until the rezoning is effective, 30 days after publication of Ordinance 01 -01. Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 8 OPTIONS 1. Approve Ordinance 01 -01 rezoning Lot 13 Block 2 of Sunset Oaks to R -1. 2. Approve Ordinance 02 -01 amending the Comprehensive Plan to allocate 2.55 acres of MUSA reserve to the 9 lots shown in the preliminary plat of Behm's Farm Park Addition. 3. Approve Resolution 01 -06 approving the preliminary plat of Behm's Farm Park Addition with the conditions listed in the resolution. 4. Deny applications. 5. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Options 1, 2, and 3 Council Member Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 9 introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 01-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R RURAL TO R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed rezoning action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan, as the site is guided for single family and park uses. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for single family and park uses. Land surrounding the site is already developed with single family homes. Parkland will remain on most of the site. The park acts as a buffer for the larger lot, unsewered homes to the west and south. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The accompanying plat proposal meets the zoning and platting requirements contained in City ordinances. Single family homes and public parks are permitted R -1 uses. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Existing utilities can accommodate the nine new lots. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The nine new homes will not cause negative impacts on the existing roads. Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on January 10, 2001. Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by rezoning from R, Rural, to R -1, Single Family Residential, the following described real estate: Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 10 Lot 13, Block 2, Sunset Oaks Section 4. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of February, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. Council Member Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 11 introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 02-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY ALLOCATING 2.55 ACRES OF MUSA RESERVE TO NINE LOTS IN THE BEHM'S FARM PARK ADDITION The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does hereby ordain: Section 1. The City Council finds that the proposed project meets the City's Interim MUSA Reserve Criteria as follows: 1. The request for MUSA is occurring concurrently with preliminary plat application. 2. The rezoning request is occurring concurrently with the MUSA request. 3. MUSA is adjacent to the site, across both Mustang and Palomino Lanes. 4. The net acreage for the nine lots is 2.55 acres, and that is the MUSA request. 5. Utilities exist directly adjacent to the site. 6. Roadways exist directly adjacent to the site. 7. The City has reviewed the proposal and there is no evidence of negative impacts to the community health, welfare, or general safety. 8. The City has reviewed the proposal and there is no evidence of negative impacts to the environment. The wetland plan was approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. 9. The revenue from developing the site into nine lots will provide funds to develop the park consistent with the City's Comprehensive Park Plan. 10. The site is within the intended Behm's Century Farms Development within Sewer District No.2 as reviewed by the Met Council. 11. Utilities exist directly adjacent to the site. Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 12 12. This is one phase of the larger Behm's development area, which is a significant commitment to the community. 13. The proposed development complies with the City's Infill Policy outlined by Resolution No. 92 -85, because: allocation of MUSA reserve will put the site within the MUSA; the development of the site has been analyzed for impacts on utility and street system costs; the analysis determined that costs will be covered by assessments, that operation and maintenance will not exceed normal costs, and there will be no additional costs. 14. Existing roads are adequate to handle traffic from the nine new proposed lots. Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on January 10, 2001. Section 3. Since the findings support the proposal, 2.55 acres of MUSA reserve shall be allocated to the area included in the nine lots of the Behm's Farm Park Addition. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of February, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 13 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-06 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BEHM'S FARM PARK ADDITION WHEREAS, the City has received an application for preliminary plat approval for Behm's Farm Park Addition, and WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on January 10, 2001, and WHEREAS, Ordinance 01 -01 rezones Lot 13 Block 2 Sunset Oaks to R -1 Single Family Residential, and WHEREAS, Ordinance 02 -01 allocates 2.55 acres of MUSA reserve to the nine lots in the proposed plat, and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the preliminary plat for Behm's Farm Park Addition with the following conditions: 4. Ordinance 01 -01 must be in effect (30 days after publication) before the final plat can be recorded. 5. Ordinance 02 -01 must be in effect (30 days after publication) before the final plat can be recorded. 6. The developer must notify purchasers of residential lots of the existence of the nearby Lino Air Park. The developer must provide to the City a copy of the notification format to be used before final plat approval by the City. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of February, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Behm's Farm Park Addition February 12, 2001 page 14 ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. VI- -COVNTY- HWe— AIGHT+OP-WAY PLAT NO 50 Mi1tN - STRCET 3 LOT 1 BLOCK I OY 4 16 15 14 1 13 112 0 d 11 10 — ho 9 CAR O 19 18 LINO 'i 17 1.6/ 15 •1, • i, 1, �' A1R 1, 18 17 EE 14 Jl3I2fII 10 9 I e PARK OUTLOT 1 2131 SS 1 BERM 112 6 5 8 7 NORT 6 5 2 16 asanr.Y[.1a INS •11i At1TlDT A 18 7 8 2 13 9 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 lYOL[T 7T11[[T 2 10 11 12 UN1`Y— ROA 1 - NO. 153= 2 3 4 56 6 30 4 7 OUTLOT f 99 2 3 8 4 5 W J T 5 14 13 • 4i- • m LILAC— - —STRE ET— LINO LAKES L R EHABILITATIO()1 CENTE STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO.49- 74TH — STREET 4P1 -1I Ot Y.00. P 5 15 14 I 1.3 12 11 10 9 IS • 1 ShRW ;Qj 7 ; 19 18 LINO �6 21 'Z' 1! PARK .8 AIR .7 - -- M 55 4 ' , Z 2__ 15 c1• C. Mu NORTH n 6 5 . ' a ? S 7 8;9 10 :1112 • •1e 3 15 14 13 4 4 1 7 5 6I 7 8 9I100i11 I2I' 1.► 33 *DI TRI F 7 3. 6 • - •4O' + 1 2 • , saaar a !w •ria Soul. 2 2 • . . 21/ • s, Kin- .ESC:: • 1 , •1 .2 , • 2 . .. • • R EHA 81 LITATI6jt;:;: 3 r ' 6' 7 8 1. 2 3 1 1 2 3 4 5. 6 7 9 /O 2 •.3 ' 4 1 5 :.tip.. •• ..... •. • , r15 -40,44 MAIN treVit ./V j i•'s. - . I ; . -.A •',1 1 L-- I i ; I ■ I i -1 i..... I . 1 j" i'.. .........• i I— ----...------.. 1 ii...------ i ' 1 • r • -.4 I MIS.411111 •111 MOO .„-• • , . , .... i ,,---r,..., ‘. ,... „ i., ; ,.,__ , ••. . -,-. , . , • , n ,___ ...._.., , , , ,, ; •, 1, 1 " : , . . 1 ,- , . sianwc..)t• offEiN.--. 1 -,--1_...... :1 • ••;--3--" . . . :-----2--5."_.... r__,, r__,... r_...r...,T....1,....... ; _1.7 . „ _ • F. .• i _ii 7,„.._ . I,. ,,,,,,....•;,,,,••••:_.2.,..rr . : 'I 1 ......._i___°. ..F 113 16 14 • 1 It T : _.....1_1_ L___ ...-....L.-1..... :. __I..; .- --; , ,, 7 i • b 1 ' -\ ..r■ i,■44.-11, , ei ■•■ PARK NORTH 4m. —TT—T—rli 1 . • ■ , I Illi i a r i . ) 4 7-- 3 , 1 i. • . 1 CENTURY t_:„._111Ci_s_1_12 .. . --,•-• I • ; • . ' — .:7.-."*' ::'...—. ................. 1 11 e• ..k/41-Z,CF):417-4.P6. 5.•••" i 1 ". . • NO), ,4.,,.......,:, •. ,,.<4....... .. \...,m., / hAf Nt >' • .•. ' I ■ ! i • • • , ' 3 - r : Aub ..1 e..• .. :I ''',,,-tf : i' • 1..... NO i f , I ;.: . .! _s_ ; ■ ! 1 , siti-,;02 i- — —,--; i ' • • I Li .-'• • --. — ; 1 , , g s a ti • : 11 i, st_2-----1....... ... ' ' . ' ...4,.. Imo .....4111* iilli.A1 • 'llt."!. ••...•;!•....,•r30. %mei . :: ' ' . . . • . * : • . ' t ' ' • ' 1 2 i ..,1. i \ i.........1•• .............. ...■ 4 ■ .. .0. :, *:;• '..... L ........ ..r.................... LIN° ' i , i I I i • • r-- 4--- .1 %:■••"' l';--1- INDUSTRY, . /.' . - .. P. A•511 riNiti. . ■• ' / 't----;" ___....... •..5 .., . • LI • LI 11••••••■ ./ c:::,-2 • J BEHM'S FARM PARK ADDITION rTl l j ( Aro- wrin►t -' 30 I 30 nvvt t tvtr t'A �►� 1 f1 L BEHM'S vL-Irt Vt\t - p JAI n1 /1Pln 1 AIIr" n +- .. q nk..vlvlll rV L.r\IrL - -- -�.---- -- - -- - - -- In - -- "' -' - -- NORTH LINE OF LOT 18. BLOCK 2, SUNSET OAKS---- •. -�` I r - 153.88-- %� I. -.0... - i '� 1 W in 1 1 OI 5 In �,'� • `` 33 1 33 20 In I 0 '' _ 0 ' J �1I 3 NI ZII , / /�� ✓ 4 � 1 / •ti`s r 'v ► NW CORNER OF LOT I6. ----- '! J 80.00 1° S 1 I� IZ I g I IM 31.74 17- 10.33 r -- 1 31 N 1 I N1 1 1 -01 Ot •1 •--- 400.00 80.00 31 I 31 4 SI - I . 1 (Vt o I t t 001 -- _J. I / 0 •Mt /' O . _ M -. S 80.00 g0 — —ow ,: r' 80.00 '*S87 °09'10 "W » -' 3.63 :87 '03'15 "E- �� $ 0 zz 8 20 1 �/ •,so ; -- 135.00/' N89'29'14 "W - -'' N/ - r � .... ' / y 9 • 4 438.01 I 6 c2- ) \ 17 INS 1. 8 1 O I =— J \ W N 1 . N89'29'14 "W 3' I of 8i 2 W N L 1 v s J 135.00 S89'29'14 "E- r, /-- 135.00 4 1 °/ LI I N to to OJ I 1 tD 18 1 6 1 O 7 1 1 i W I 4_ rC c;' z N N -1 3 —1-- G1 135.00 N89 °29'14 "W4 - 573.22 N 87'21'40" E-- '-- -SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13. BLOCK 2. SUNSET OAKS i 2 Io 33 i 33 1I 135.21 vnl 1 )T VV{ \1 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22. S 0 50 100 150 SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET o - DENOTES IRON MONUMENT. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: 5-4 4- 1-5 10 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY UNES UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. HY —LAND SURVEYING, P.A. LAND SURVEYORS SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS • "FES324• —- 144;/,r G ,• 90 tto \ R -15‘\ \\ s %\1. e \ °• i 11 1 • 1 q00 90' 10, 101 10 SE 905.6 0 z CB 326 OS os i t CB 325AAl JOmS.?I�2 ite .................. _ / r / ...............j .! r / , 1 r / 1 ' / .' I / - -- ' r 80 0 25 50 100 r 1 & ' i • I/ 1 Y P I °In/ 200 GRAPHICS SCALE -' (in feet) , y 9.4 SEW 00. /I; �'• "i a.' • d , 'I%4�`1 /' 'I Imo' --¢1�J %/� — — < 8,b -r / \23 TVA— —r -- / iE / +- —� 7 4 1122" ' 1 4 t SHEET 2 3 HATE• 12/11/00 PROJECT NO.: PRELIMINARY PLAT BERM ' S FARM PARK ADDITION CENTURY FARM DEVELOPMENT, Inc. Lino Lakes. Mn ^ -•_ . �.••�• 4'••i ti q1 r - ,y .•. T..w . , `�'` "'' �` ��` ,M t+..r m... a .rx•.:r.. J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS, INC. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN 6601 - 75th Ave. N. Brooklyn Park. MN 55428 Phone: (6121 566-6158 FAX: (612) 566-4374 g212p6 CADD no.: � _ 11s ____ w.. Ille..eb 9r:e•rr KII 1.105' 0• 1 906 . I S X06. 15 4 � zD' - - rte., r I 1 . m m o � � u DEC CITY OF Lk J7-1 �l ' � ,' �� ~ �/ /' ~ , L. , ' - '� ' `r-S.° C A, —^~ ` '19„5, - -- — ' --—' ■, 101 ' ' ''o .............. ' ms pipe .� _ ^^ 0 ° 000 AKE ' ~ ---` ! --^' .' .'�---� 0 25 50 100 200 GRAPHICS SCALE (in feet) ' / ' / / | / `` '1'. . | 2____. �� |~ ,�� �0!~ ,/ =� , / �� ' ' ^ _/ ^«p., ,� .' ^,' c, `• ' . ' . � ', . ^ ^ . ' ' '-~ peu .°� --- . . . ^� ~, ' —°—,~ ` . . ' -. ,'^_,�� .. ' | '`. / i ' 11 / ^/- - ,. . , .~ ~' '^ |~�� `�/ . ., ° .` '`~.• ' . '/ ~-v`w-_~�_ 7�^|'- ^ / '. , / '.4- / / / / ' / ' / ^/� / / �� /' / � ,/ — — / REVISED 10/11/00 REVISED PIPE OUTLET & DITCH & ADDED EASEMENT REVISED 8/29/00 REVISED SILT FENCE. TRAIL & WETLAND LOCATION REVISED 0/30/99 REVISE SILT FENCE LOCATION REVISED 9/9/99 ADD EROSION CONTROL DETAIL ^ \ ^ '—^ , � �' '� \ '/ � � SHEET 3 DATE, GRAD |NG PLAN u- M'° ��� CENTURY FARM DEVELOPMENT. ��}� Inc. ADDITION '— � J S ' INC. mrcpLAwwwsAND DESIGN «sm'/s`h^"^� Brooklyn MN 55428 4/18/00 ��� omo�� `` |Os' ,mm./s '/(DC *\. — CI ",r - 'FES_334 J , • • • �. • / • 1 ci- • 1 1 0 1' 9. -- ` ,k�ia` ° FES 13 . 11 I 04 • 90 04 SEWO 905.6 EW0 1905_6 SE 0 o, A. m • O • 903 • SEW/ 90' ,A_ 905.6 .y 904 904 03 9Q3 0 LANE . CB 326 loins P'P e 1ne , DEC OF SUNSET ROAD 1 I, 3 y _. J_ 907901 4 • 1 1 / 1 ' .. , 000 AXES 0 25 50 100 tl 200 GRAPHICS SCALE (in feet) 904,3 SEWO' •Fe ' - . \ - ' ' • "'%1'7::-A:-.?"132:71-.i l.3- ?• % _- - ` I I • : j r • 7 ,/, ‘.1"r.. 0 J^ 1 ,`, • 'Iy/ i I 1 ,1 /. , rsE /,V' :4�ff /' .1� / •• -/ \ w �'� a6_ i • 555 9w 990007 • • • eee _ • • ,, •.•moo �o\ 904.2 SE <111t4 — '1{12.0- _ _ • S - -19 14 1 -r 1 , • • • • • SHEET 1 3 HATE: EXISTING CO N D I T I 0 N S BEHM ' S FARM PARK ADD 1 T 1 ON CENTURY FARM DEVELOPMENT, Inc . Lino Lakes. Mn :r8 Z °"'7 :: ` �,.r'r "'° ...'.� .t .1..a�: ,^ 0 _ .., +n+ "'' t''s'1 `` "° 00 _ - "�" "`-- .J C `J J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS. INC. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN 6601 - 75th Ave. N. Brooklyn Pork. MN 55428 Y Phone: 16121566 -6E8 FAX (612) 566 -4374 12/11/00 PROJECT No.: 921206 cao0 No.: J+S x.y nr,_ I 46 ^_— n„•1��� UPS �.. r { '1 • 906.15 06' 15 STAFF ORIGINATOR: C. C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 7 E Jeff Smyser February 12, 2001 FIRST READING: Ordinance 03 -01 Rezone City Hall Park From Rural To Public Semi - Public To Allow for Qwest Wireless PCS Tower 4/5 vote Qwest Wireless LLC has submitted a request for the City to rezone City Hall Park. Qwest proposes to construct a 135 -foot high tower for antennas for wireless telephone service. Such towers are not allowed in the Rural zoning district. City Hall Park currently is zoned Rural. Towers are allowed in a PSP Public Semi - Public district. Qwest has requested rezoning City Hall Park to PSP. The Federal Communications Act of 1996 requires that the City regulations "shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." This does not mean the City must allow towers wherever a wireless company wants one. However, the City must provide locations where a wireless provider can have facilities to provide service. The analysis below discusses this issue in more detail. The tower itself requires only an administrative permit if the zoning on the proposed site allows the tower. ANALYSIS Land use and zoning for the site and surrounding land are listed in the following table. Comprehensive Plan (existing) Comprehensive Plan (1998 draft) Zoning site Rural Low Density Sewered Resid. and Greenway Rural north Rural Low Density Sewered Resid. Rural east Rural Low Density Sewered Resid. and Unsewered Resid. Rural west Rural Low Density Unsewered Resid. and Greenway Rural south Rural Low Density Unsewered Resid. and Greenway Rural Qwest Rezone February 12, 2001 page 2 Federal Law: Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 addresses local zoning authority and provision of personal wireless services. Personal wireless services includes mobile phones and pagers. The following summary is just that a summary. The Act states that local zoning authority is preserved. However: The regulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities by any State or local government or instrumentality thereof — (I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; and (II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. In other words, the City must allow wireless providers to provide service. If there is a gap in their coverage, the City must provide sites for filling the gap. The City cannot allow one company to provide service while preventing a competitor from doing so. Zoning: City Ordinance No. 01 -98 added to the zoning ordinance requirements for towers in the City. The requirements include which zoning districts will allow new towers, which allow antennas on existing structures. New towers are allowed only in PSP and GI districts. Other districts allow antennas on existing structures such as buildings and water towers, but do not allow new towers. Also, there are some differences between requirements for wireless service towers and towers for radio and television. The applicant for a new tower must demonstrate that the location of the new tower is necessary to provide wireless coverage and that there is no existing structure that can accommodate the antenna. We required Qwest to submit information on these points. The City's consultant has analyzed the information. All new wireless communication towers must be monopoles, and the design of new towers must accommodate "co- location," which means that the tower must be able to support several antennas. This requirement reduces the need for a new tower for every new antenna. The tower setback from the property line must be the height of the tower, but exception is possible if it is demonstrated that the tower failure will occur in a lesser distance. That is, if the tower fails, it will crumple rather than just fall over. The proposed tower is 135 ft. tall and is located more than 300 ft. from both Rondeau Road West and Main St. The City land is actually two parcels. The tower location is approximately 110 feet from the property line of the two City parcels. Because of the monopole design, tower would not topple its full 135 feet. Qwest Rezone February 12, 2001 page 3 In the PSP and GI zones, a new tower requires an administrative permit. This type of permit was created by Ordinance No. 01 -98. It does not require a public hearing or review and approval by the P & Z or the City Council. (The public hearing at the P & Z was required for the rezoning.) However, the rezoning hearing provides a good venue to discuss the tower application, which is driving the rezoning request. Tower Location and Description: The proposed location is in City Hall Park at the corner of Main St. and Rondeau Road. The tower would be constructed next to the hockey rink and the Public Works buildings. It will be designed to accommodate antennas for two additional wireless providers, for a total of three. The proposed tower will be 135 ft. high. The tower is approximately four feet in diameter at the base and tapers to about two feet at the top. Several equipment cabinets will be installed next to the pole. These cabinets will be about nine feet long and six feet tall. There are several color options. Several field lights now on a wooden pole would be relocated onto the Qwest tower. The entire installation of tower and cabinets will be placed on concrete pavers that will cover approximately 16'x 18'. Below grade, the tower will be stabilized with a large concrete footing. Necessity of New Tower vs. Utilizing Existing Structures: As stated above, an applicant for a new tower must demonstrate that the location of the new tower is necessary to provide wireless coverage and that there is no existing structure that can accommodate the antenna. Qwest has explained that it needs a facility in the northern portion of the City to provide service. There are no water towers or existing towers in the northern part of Lino Lakes. The locations of the City's two water towers do not fill the gap in the Qwest coverage. Qwest currently is on the Centerville water tower, a Circle Pines location, and on a communication tower in Columbus Township, near the freeway. The tower location study conducted by staff indicates no nearby structures. The City has hired Garry Lysiak of Owl Engineering to analyze the information, and Mr. Lysiak will present his analysis. If there are no existing structures that will accommodate Qwest's service provision needs, the City must consider what is the best site for a new facility. The proposed site is owned by the City. The City will gain lease income from Qwest. In addition to the senior center and recreational activities, the site serves as the Public Works headquarters, which is an industrial - like activity. The large, open park area creates separation from surrounding agricultural and residential uses. A tower on this site will be less intrusive than on other sites in the north part of Lino Lakes, and the City can exercise more control over activity on City property than it can over activity on private property. We also must consider future needs of other PCS providers. This tower will provide for additional antennas for two other companies, which avoids the need for additional towers for two firms. Qwest Rezone February 12, 2001 page 4 In addition, the site can accommodate additional towers in the long term if needed. This may be an unpleasant possibility for some, but the fact is that there are numerous licensed wireless service providers in the area, and we do not know where all the coverage gaps may be. We may be able to keep them all on one location, if that is the desirable option for the City. It could be a policy choice between concentrating towers on one site or dispersing them onto several locations. Without other sites available, this site is the best one to accommodate federally mandated service provision. Utilities: The tower facility will require electricity and telephone connection. This important requirement also influences the selection of sites. Landscaping: We will work with Qwest on landscaping around the tower facility as part of the administrative permit. REZONING The zoning ordinance requires the Planning and Zoning Board to consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment based upon, but not limited to, the following factors. These factors provide a good basis for City Council findings: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Neither the current nor the draft new Comprehensive Plan addresses tower location. The proposed use must be considered in relation to the designated general land use categories. The current Plan guides the site Rural. The draft Plan land use map currently shows the site as Low Density Sewered Residential in phase 2 (after 2010). However, the site should be shown as Public Semi - Public, and staff is recommending this change. Given the federal law, Lino Lakes must accommodate towers somehow. Towers are more compatible with industrial and public uses than with residential uses. The zoning ordinance allows new towers in the GI and PSP districts. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (in the zoning ordinance). The tower will conform to the requirements of the zoning ordinance. It will accommodate additional users (co- location). Because of the design of the tower, it would not topple its full 135 feet but crumple. The nearest property line divides two City -owned parcels. The tower is 300 Qwest Rezone February 12, 2001 page 5 feet from the nearest road. If the rezoning is approved, the tower is a permitted use with an administrative permit. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. No sewer or water facilities will be needed. The needed electricity and telephone service are not City services. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The tower will not generate additional traffic other than construction vehicles and an occasional service vehicle. The City granted a conditional use permit (CUP) to a church for the use of the senior center space in the City building. That CUP remains valid as long as the church complies with the conditions. A church is a conditional use in a Rural zone, but is not listed in the PSP zone. The church use will become a nonconforming use. This is a legal use which can continue under the conditions of the CUP. Staff recommends finding that the proposed rezoning to PSP complies with the above factors. Ordinance 03 -01 includes these as findings. Submittals: This review is based on the following plan submittals: Letter /description dated 12/10/00 from Kelly Sleeter of Qwest Letter re: monopole failures from Adrian McJunkin of Valmont FCC Radio Station Authorization Collocaction Technical Data Sheet Title sheet Z -1 Vicinity map sheet Z -1 Site plan sheet Z -3 Enlarged site plan sheet Z -4 Elevation sheet Z -5 Title sheet T -1 Site plan sheet CE -1 Elevations & details sheet C -2 Enlarged site plan & details sheet C -3 Details & electrical enlarged site plan sheet E -1 Electrical details sheet E -2 Letters (2) from Manish Vaishnav of Qwest dated 12/21/00 received 12/11/00 received 12/11/00 received 12/11/00 received 12/11/00 received 12/11/00 received 12/11/00 received 12/11/00 received 12/11/00 received 12/11/00 received 12/21/00 received 12/21/00 received 12/21/00 received 12/21/00 received 12/21/00 received 12/21/00 received 12/21/00 Qwest Rezone February 12, 2001 page 6 Qwest service area information submitted to Owl Engineering. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Staff held a neighborhood meeting January 4 for residents in the area. The residents who attended would prefer the tower not be placed on the proposed site. However, they acknowledged the constraints of the federal law. The existing location of the hockey rink lights is a problem for one resident, an issue that may be resolved by adjusting light placement and aiming. PARK BOARD ACTION The Park Board discussed this application at its meeting, also on January 4. The Park Board acknowledged the constraints of the federal law and had no serious opposition to the proposal. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on January 3, 2001. That Board recommends finding an alternative location away from Rondeau Lake, preferably the City's water towers. As noted as part of the technical analysis, the water towers do not fill Qwest's service needs. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ACTION At its January 10, 2001 meeting, the P & Z approved the rezoning request based on the factors considered for a zoning amendment, listed above. OPTIONS 1. Approve Ordinance 03 -01 rezoning City Hall Park and adjacent City property to Public Semi - Public. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. Council Member Qwest Rezone February 12, 2001 page 7 introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 03-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN CITY -OWNED REAL ESTATE FROM R RURAL TO PSP PUBLIC SEMI - PUBLIC The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed rezoning action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided for single family use, though its historical and future long -term use will be a public park, senior center, and public works facility. The proposed Public Semi - Public zoning is consistent with these uses. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is intended for park and other public uses including the City's public works facility. Surrounding land is guided for residential or rural uses and already includes single family homes. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. All uses will be required through permits and standard review processes to meet zoning and other requirements contained in City ordinances. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. No need is foreseen for additional City utilities. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Proposed uses will generate very little additional traffic and will not cause negative impacts on the existing roads. 6. The construction of a new personal wireless service tower is a permitted secondary use with an administrative permit in the PSP district, as described in the zoning ordinance, Sec. 9 Subd. 1.H, and Sec. 3 Subd. 15.G.3.b. The primary uses of the site are the public park and public works facility. Qwest Rezone February 12, 2001 page 8 Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on January 10, 2001, according to state law and City ordinance. Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by rezoning from R, Rural, to PSP, Public Semi - Public the following described real estate: The southeast one - Quarter of the southeast one - Quarter (SE 1/4 of SE 1/4) of Section 4, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the West 10 acres thereof. Subject to existing easements and reservations and together with the right to maintain drainage ditches thereon as now existing. and The East 233 feet of the South 468 feet of Section 4, Town 31, Range 22, Anoka county, Minnesota. Section 4. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and 30 days after publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of February, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. Wireless L.L.C. 426 N.Fairview, 1st Floor St. Paul, MN 55104 651.642.6942 fax December 10, 2000 Jeff Smyser City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Rezoning and administrative review application for a Personal Communication Service (PCS) facility with a 135' monopole to be located on City property at City Hall Park. Qwest Wireless L.L.C. will be pawing a rezoning of City Hall Park located at 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes. MN and an administrative permit for a communication tower. BACKGROUND To fulfill its mandate from the FCC. Qwest Wireless has developed a grid of antenna throughout the service area. These facilities must be spaced, depending on certain technical and geographical variables, at intervals approximate! "thit to Iv: m "lles om each other and at a height of approximately one hundred and fifty feet to one unfired and eighty -five feet. Rural areas have a lower user density; therefore towers can be further apart and provide a larger coverage area. The objective of the system is to provide wireless services to all Twin City area communities. Since Qwest Wireless intends to utilize PCS as an affordable Wireless Local Loop service, coverage at the neighborhood level is essential (unlike Cellular, which typically focuses on mobile service). Our services are currently voice. but will likely expand into data transmission within the next five years. Given the size and magnitude of use of the Qwest Wireless system, there must be several antenna facilities located in Anoka County for Qwcst Wireless to provide service throughout the community. As each additional facility is constructed, its location and height become relatively fixed. This makes it essential to ensure that any newly proposed facilities are at the proper heights and locations to allow them to "connect" and provide seamless coverage between the existing sites. Because of this. the amount of REGEN DEC 11 2000 Gtr( OFfil LOSS USA ryt.�1 uusaxasua Proud Sponsor Wireless L.L.C. 426 N.Fairview, 1st Floor St. Paul, MN 55104 651.642.6942 fax Qwest. flexibility in the acceptable heights and locations of the remaining proposed facilities is reduced. With these parameters in mind, we have identified the property located at 1189 Main Street that meets the engineering requirements for the proposed site. LOCATION SELECTED FOR PROPOSED US WEST PCS FACILITY The proposed facility will include antenna configuration at the top of a 135 -ft. monopole. The monopole will be galvanized in color and constructed to carry two additional fireless carriers. The cabinets that house the electronics for the monopole at the base of the facility will be no longer than 9 ft and no higher than 6 ft. The proposed facility does not generate noticeable heat, noise, vibration, traffic, pollution, or waste. Site construction and installation will not create a safety hazard or damage adjacent properties in any manner. The size and location of the parcel of land on which the site will be located more than adequately safeguards against hazards or possible damage to neighboring property. Maintenance of the facility consists of routine checks by a qualified engineer and occasional snowplowing. This imposes no additional risk to adjacent landowners. Appropriate landscaping will minimize the visual effects of the tower. In addition, upon cessation of use. the owner of the tower will have the responsibility to remove the tower and the related facilities. Finally, the proposed site meets the goals of the City's Comprehensive plan by: facilitating wireless telecommunication, locating on a preferred land use area, minimizing adverse visual effects. avoiding property damage. creating a structure where future telecommunication companies may locate. operating in a manner that imposes no additional health risks, and preserving the quality of living in the community. Qwest will not create any additional public cost or service requirements. In addition, the monopole will be tri- locatable (two additional users. three total). Sincerely, Kelly Sleeter Qwest Wireless L.L.C. Enclosures USA macnoma Proud Sponsor iUiu4i ut, .t,E 15:18 F.is 503 383 4613 valmont MICROFLECT Adrian Schottroff Qwest Wireless, LLC 426 North Fairview Ave. St. Paul, MN 55104 Ph: (651) 643 -2073 Fx: (651) 642 -4719 VALKUN1 ill! tturl...1 October 3, 2000 DEC 1 1 2000 CJTE'O` LINO L- A6CE"1 Subject: Failure Modes for Tapered Monopoles and mounting appurtenances. Communication Monopoles Designed for the State of Minnesota Dear Mr. Schottroff, We understand that there may be some concern on the part of local building officials regarding the potential for failure of proposed tapered monopoles we will be quoting for Qwest Wireless project sites located in Minnesota. To address this concern we offer the following: Communications monopole structures designed by Valmont/Microflect are typically sized in accordance with the latest revision of the EIA/TIA 222 Standard entitled "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures." This standard has been approved by ANSI, who has generated the standard for "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures ". The standard, which is the basis for design loading for practically every building code and standard in the country, has dealt with the design of antenna support structures for over 40 years. '.The ELA. standard, based on provisions of this nationally known specification, bas a long history of reliability. At its core philosophy is it's first and foremost priority to safeguard and maintain the health and welfare of the public. The EIA standard dictates minimum wind loading (the predominant loading on a monopole structure) for each county in the United States. It is Valmont/Microileet's policy to use the wind loading listed in the latest ETA standard as a minimum loading unless the customer specifies a larger value. Statistically, the wind speed listed in the EIA standard has been determined to be that wind which has an average reoccurrence of 50 years (i.e. the magnitude has a 2% chance of occurring in any one year). T'nis wind is the "fastest mile" wind at 33 ft. above ground. By definition, the "fastest mile" wind is the average velocity of a mile of wind passing a fixed point. This "fastest mile" wind is customized with height, exposure, and gust factors that apply to a particular installation which, in effect, increases the wind velocity. Page 1 of 3 10 -03 -00 17:21 =_1uU1 Cnmmunieonons 0;';, ValmontIndu :tries, Inc 3.75 25th Street SE Salem, Cregon 973C2.1123 USA 503.383.9207 fax 503.303.460 www.valmont,com TO:US WEST WIRELESS FROM:503 363 4613 p01 1u /u.ivu LUr, 15:1$ FiL JUJ JUJ 401J The loads generated by this wind speed, along with weight of the monopole sections and any ice loading being considered, are used to design the structural system. To fail monopole sections, the wind must exceed all of our estimates for magnitude, duration, as well as overcome the factor of safety determined from the design. Say for instance, a 150 ft. monopole is designed for an 90 mph Basic Wind Speed. This Basic Wind Speed translates into a sustained, gusted wind speed of 145 mph at the top of the monopole. Considering a survivable wind speed which considers the ultimate yield strength of the steel, failure of the monopole would not be expected until wind speeds exceeded 162 mph. Beyond 162 mph we can only make an educated guess as to the failure mechanisms that would take place. The term Failure used above only suggests that "local buckling" has occurred at this point. "Local Buckling" is the result of a relatively small portion of the shaft distorting by "kinking" the steel. Local Buckling does not cause a free falling pole, rather it relieves the stresses from the pole at this location. If wind speeds continue to increase, the pole may continue to buckle and eventually crumple/fold over upon itself. Once this takes place, a sig aincant reduction in wind load will cause the pole not to experience further deformations. In the above scenerio, we are assuming sustained, gusted winds. As we all know, a gust would soon dissipate and, after this peak wind is gone, the stress in the pole would be reduced. Poles are flexible, forgiving structures which are not generally susceptible to darnage by impact loads such as a wind gust or earthquake shocks. It may take some time for the entire structure to "see" the impact loading. Even after a local buckle, the pole has significant capacity. It is this capacity along with the transitory nature of the loading that prevents a pole from "falling over." It should also be noted that typical antennas are designed to survive 125 mph. With the absence of antenna loading the pole would have additional capacity. Valmont/Microflect's Pole design and full -scale testing have provided the public with a very reliable product. Poles have gone through extensiv&full scale testing, resulting in a history of being extremely reliable. This public, in my opinion, has been well served. Valmont/MViicrol'lect has provided structures that have performed well during the earthquakes in California, the hurricanes in the South (including Hugo, Andrew, and Opal), and a number of tornadoes. ValmontfMicroflect has never experienced an in service failure of a communication pole due to weather induced overloading, even though, as in the cases of Hurricane Hugo and Hurricane Andrew, the wind speeds may have exceeded the design wind speed. Valrnont/Microflect has no direct experience with monopole failures. However, from what evidence we have seen from other vendor's experiences, I can state that it is rare for a monopole to fall in a radius larger than, say, half it's height, and that in most cases it will collapse in a small confined area as it comes down upon itself. 10 -03 -00 17:21 TO:US WEST WIRELESS Page 2 of 3 FROM:503 363 4613 P52 ��• ,_ �,.la r.ii 003 363 4613 Valmont/Microflect's communication towers have proven to be very reliable products. In our over 40 years of engineering and fabricating thousands of towers and monopoles, we have riot had one structure fail due to overloading (even in the extreme cases that wind speeds have exceeded design values). We use the latest standards, wind speed information, and sophisticated analytical tools to ensure that we maintain our unblemished record for quality. I trust this letter satisfies your requests. If you have additional questions or comments, I may be reached at (503) 3154515. Sincerely, Adrian McJui kin, P.E. Communications Division Pole Engineering Team Leader I hereby certify that this plan, speci- fication, or report we$ arRpared by me or under my direct S :loer•tg ; •- and that I am a duly Registerer "•• •i.eet' under the Taws ie State • rtesota. Page 3 of 3 Registration No. 25175 10 -03 -00 17:21 TO:US WEST WIRELESS FROM:503 363 4613 tit a tl :} P 03 IMINISOPEEEffiffinii WQGO.ODpAAAGG� I. •- ecmeee mace mil s. +u s - ii nob gm ple��0...,�. a 4 stow= a kigi 10 a ®l ee 019 we* 0 ' IMAM CEA- DIM q WM 211 MEW KCEIJEKUII d /O vill1 IV En 'a rot \` MME K" M'a nu p cn.�tnwmili.�Y.R f , _0� �pi00 �1- III:0 �,�,,,.�. a �.,. alga l I_I- N MI P '''Imilli IMINIMPI 1 .41111111111:A#31 . , "tia Slattzw-it*(w Ili _ lar• a mir __ Ir Mall tee S519111111111111, zwin_ samitm , IHRIEICIL.M011150":"' rldtrr.orrttlE1111111111 gassmammessair • wornair ik2st..):41Mit N • • Ain • • • Mar 4 as m E_ s 1 1 c g�a E4 0 • U • O ;) Z W F- LlW WOL W t!) Z z Q2 2 0 cn z W < co Oz Z_� O 0 0 z 0 Z 2 0 Z -1 TITLE SHEET Z -2 VICINITY MAP Z -3 SITE PLAN Z -4 ENLARGED SITE PLAN Z -5 ELEVATION 1 DESIGN TYPE I MONOPOLE PROJECT DIRECTORY 1 4 Co F i 131 3 33 3 3 11 3 03'1 ' 3 333)3 &333, 3 33 �3 3 �03 3, ;; 3 3 3� 333 3 M ON 3NV1 f V3ONO?i gg$ 1 3 2 s N N 9 211 OIV NI INThO 0 1S NM1 'EXHIBIT B' 0 M •M• 0'a M'o'a 'M'0• *M'O'a •nn•o•a a 3 0 a a -J a -J a 3 0 z 3 0 0 La! J — -J wcc a a 0 0 z J a. 4, J a 0 0 o� 0 1 Z ^ 0 U W z� N J — J W 0 / 1 d ld ld ld / 1 E 4 'EXHIBIT B" gn ENLARGED SITE PUN 0 N m<0 0 X 241 gO UD Zm tY X4 m 0 EXISTING BUILDINGS N \ 0 0 US WEST MONOPOL US WEST ICE BRID 0 Z Z y U Y Z W X Z EXISTING BLEACHERS EXISTING BASKETBALL. BACKBOARD 135 —0" EXISTING WOOD POLE AND LIGHTS TO BE REMOVED 1:13'—(1" LIGHTNING ROD US WEST ANTENNAS (TYP.) z- US WEST MONOPOLE INSTALL EXISTING LUMINAIRES de SUPPORTS AT EXISTING HEIGHTS US WEST ICE BRIDGE EXISTING BUILDINGS EXISTING HOCKEY RINK GROWTH CABINET (FUTURE) US WEST EQUIPMENT iEXISTING GRADE .----\-'------- MAIN STREET ------%----z) 0 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16".=1.-0" 0' 16' 32' N en g { a a 5 z i 1 i 2 c 0 TO a i i .91I81HX3. P• > > >>1* x I 1 1 i 1 6 i AGENDA ITEM 7 F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland MEETING DATE: February 12, 2001 TOPIC: Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive, Variance VOTE REQURED: Simple Majority DESCRIPTION: NOTE: This item was tabled from the January 8, 2001 City Council Meeting for further discussion at a Council Work Session. The Staff position has not changed from the Staff Report presented below. Minutes from the 1/8/01 Council meeting are included for your information. Mr. Chris Lyden owns 4.07 acres of property, zoned rural, at 6275 Holly Drive. This property is a pre- existing non - conforming lot of record as the ordinance requires a minimum of 10 acres in the rural zoning district. Mr. Lyden would like to construct a 34' x 64' pole barn on the property using metal siding and roofing material. The Zoning Ordinance specifically prohibits metal siding and roofing material on properties less than five (5) acres in size. The proposed construction will meet the square footage requirement (total of 3,600 square feet allow) and the setback requirements (5' on the side, 40' on the front). The Variance requested is from the City's Zoning Ordinance, Section 3. General Provisions, Subd. 4. General Building and Use Provisions, D. Accessory Buildings & Structures, 8. Rural & Residential Zoning District Accessory Buildings, d. Two and One- Half (2 ' /2) Acres to less than Five (5) Acres (R, R -X, R -BR, and PSP Districts), Section 5) No metal corrugated siding or roof, except upon tool sheds less than four hundred (400) square feet in area. And, a variance to allow pole barn construction because this section of the Ordinance does not specifically allow pole barns as do those sections pertaining to parcels over 5 acres in size. Mr. Lyden has described his hardship as follows (detailed letter attached for your information): 1. Pole barn type construction is preferable for this property due to questionable soils. 2. Pole barn type construction, without a cement floor is necessary to preserve 1958 mid - engine all wood day cruiser due to moisture factors. 3. Pole barn type construction will reduce threat of loss from grass fires. Findings of Fact. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Staff has reviewed this request and does not believe the Variance criteria can be meet in this case. Mr. Lyden can construct a wood frame building, on footings without a slab, that would have a similar effect to a post frame building although it may be more costly. Pole buildings are not permitted on less than five acres. Over the years City Staff has received numerous requests for such construction and has always discourage the Variance procedure because in most cases the requests were based on the additional construction costs. Additionally, in the 1997 Zoning Ordinance update the 5 acre requirement was maintained. For these reasons we would recommend denial of the variance requested. For Council information, the adjoining property owners have indicated no objections to the variance request. The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed this item at their December meeting. Mr. Rafferty made a motion to approve the variance and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion failed with 3 ayes (Lane, Rafferty, Zych), 3 nays (Corson, Schilling, Chair Schaps) and 1 abstain (Johnson, he was interviewing with the Council at the time of discussion). OPTIONS: 1. Deny Variance as requested and adopt Resolution 2001 -02. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 CENTERVILLE c L AXES. PARK': 121Z;=1 %viol gill 3 �� ©i °rinooio. CI= TOPE VCDall rgs 33 SHADED AREA DENOTES PARK LOCATION MAP OF r`1TICc tNin- 1 1M( 1 COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2001 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA There was no Public Safety Department report. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT,- Resolution No. 01— 02, Variance Request by Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Orlin, Jeff Smyser (3/5 Vote Required) — Staff presented the application by explaining Chris Lyden owns.07 acres of property, zoned rural, at 6275 Holly Drive. Since the ordinance requires a minimum of ten acres in the rural zoning district, this property is a pre- existing non - conforming lot of record. Mr. Lyden would like to construct a 34 -foot by 64 -foot pole barn on the property using metal siding and roofing material. The Zoning Ordinance specifically prohibits metal siding and roofing material on properties less that five (5) acres in size. The proposed construction will meet the square footage requirement and setback requirements. Staff reviewed the findings of fact that need to be met for variance consideration and indicated staff does not believe this variance criteria can be met in this case since Mr. Lyden can construct a wood frame building, on footings without a slab, that would have a similar effect to a post frame building, although it would be more costly. Staff advised it has received numerous requests for such construction and always discouraged the variance procedure because in most cases, the requests were based on the additional construction costs. Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting the applicant has described his hardship as follows: 1. Pole barn type construction is preferable for this property due to questionable soils. 2. Pole barn type construction, without a cement floor, is necessary to preserve 1958 mid - engine all wood day cruiser due to moisture factors. 3. Pole barn type construction will reduce threat of loss from grass fires. Staff noted the adjoining property owners have indicated no objections to the variance request. Mayor Bergeson inquired about the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Board. Staff advised the Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item at their December 2000 meeting. Mr. Rafferty made a motion to approve the variance and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion failed with 3 ayes, 3 nays, and 1 abstain. Council Member Carlson referred to the Findings of Fact. She inquired about how the City should handle the Findings of Fact that are not met on the resolution itself. The City Attorney advised the Findings of Fact that are not met should be noted on the resolution. 6 COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2001 Mayor Bergeson asked if the size and the location of the structure meet all the City requirements. Staff advised the size of the structure does meet the City requirements. A site plan has not been reviewed in relation to the setbacks. Mayor Bergeson asked if the exterior materials comply with the ordinance. Staff advised the variance is being requested due to the exterior materials. Metal siding and pole barns are prohibited on less than five (5) acres by the City ordinance. Council Member O'Donnell inquired about the additional cost for a wood building. Staff advised cost consideration is not allowed when reviewing an ordinance. Council Member Reinert asked if the weight of the proposed building is better suited on this soil than a wood structure. The City Engineer advised no information has been presented regarding soil borings related to a wood vs. metal structure. Mr. Chris Lyden, former Council Member, 6275 Holly Drive, came forward and stated he has spent five (5) years restoring his boat. He referred to a picture of the boat. He stated he does not want anyone to vote yes because of who is requesting the variance. He stated he would like the Council to approve the variance because it is the right thing to do. Mr. Lyden continued stating that he understands some variance requests are significant and some are insignificant. This is not a significant variance relating to size, height, setbacks, County ditches, and the number of buildings. He stated the merit of the variance is based on hydric soils. Staff does not have soil boring information. It is the County's and Rice Creek Watershed District responsibility to determine soils. He advised the Rice Creek Watershed District has approved his application. The only appropriate type of building to place on these soils is a pole barn type building. He stated he can get a guarantee for the building from the Walters Company. He referred to a copy of a letter from the Walters Company that indicates the building is right for the type of soil. Mr. Lyden reviewed the significant upgrades he is proposing to comply with concerns from Council Members. He stated the building costs over $22,000 and is a high quality building. The building will be placed on a unique position on the property and will be very well buffered. Only 1/6 of the building will be viewed. The main door of the building is the garage door even though the building is metal. He noted the neighbors support his proposal. He stated he would not ask the Council to do anything that would hurt the City. He stated he does not see a down side to approval. He stated it is possible he can match the structure to the vinyl siding he plans to install on his home. Council Member O'Donnell stated he appreciates all the information received on this issue. He stated variances are difficult because of the issue of consistency. He expressed concern regarding approval and opening up the City for other variance requests. Other residents may want to do the same on their lots. He inquired about the size of lots that the ordinance applies to. Staff advised that each category of lot sizes have a maximum total size of accessory buildings. The proposed building is under the maximum size allowed. 7 COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2001 Mr. Lyden stated the ordinance prohibits metal buildings on 2 1/2 - 5 acres of land. However, the ordinance would allow him to have two (2) metal buildings larger than the proposed building. He indicated he is willing to waive his right to a second building so he can have one quality building. Council Member Reinert stated he is leaning towards allowing the,vance because this is a specific situation. He stated the proposed building is high quality and aestheticallypleasing. He stated he believes there is a hardship in this case and the neighbors are not opposed. The acreage of the property is very close to the lot minimum for this type of building. He indicated hevould not support the variance except for the numerous amount of exceptions in this case. All the variables need to be included so the City does not open the door for more requests. He added the variance request is an extreme case and he would not support it because Mr. Lyden was formerly on the City Council. Mayor Bergeson stated metal siding is permissible on smaller sheds. He inquired about the staff comments indicating metal siding is not allowed on this building. Staff advised there is a copy of the ordinance in each packet that refers to what is allowed. Smaller size buildings are allowed to have metal siding. Council Member Carlson stated this is not an easy decision because of the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Board. She stated one member would have been in favor of the variance if the siding were changed. She referred to number 4 in the Findings of Fact noting she is leaning towards denial because she does not want to set a precedence. She stated she has voted no on other requests for this reason. She stated she cannot support a pole barn building on less than five (5) acres of land. Mayor Bergeson stated he has looked at the request as it relates to two (2) issues: poles and general structure of the building, and exterior materials that would not be allowed on conventional constructions. He stated the Planning and Zoning Board minutes indicated there is no scientific evidence that supports poor soil, although there is plenty of circumstantial evidence. He stated he would be supportive of a pole structure to minimize the effect on the soil. He stated he can not find a reason to justify exterior materials that are not allowed in conventional construction. Council Member Dahl stated that everyone needs to remember that Council Members are residents and have problems. That is why the City has variances. Each variance is unique and are utilized to help residents. The City Council is here to help residents. The building is smaller than what is allowed and it meets all setbacks. There are soil problems and wetland issues. The main issue is vertical siding vs. horizontal sidings. She stated she does have garage doors on her pole barn and it is still good looking after eight (8) years. Mr. Lyden is doing improvements to make the building look better. There are not too many places that he can build on his lot due to location of well and septic. Putting windows in the garage door is a good compromise. Mr. Lyden is meeting the City more than half way. She inquired about the number of parcels under five (5) acres within the City that would want to construct a pole barn. Staff advised they have no way of determining the number of lots less than five (5) acres that would want to construct a pole barn. COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2001 Council Member Dahl stated she does not believe there are that many. She stated that approval of the variance is not setting a precedence. The property has huge evergreen that will screen the building. She stated she has been told that it is practical to construct this type o 1ding due to footings in the soil. Slab and concrete would crack or deteriorate and result in a ju y { n e City of Lino Lakes wants aesthetically pleasing buildings. Mr. Lyden has gone above at�c b yo traccommodate 1 V4 the City. There are other pole barns in the area and it is zoned rural. She indica es sh•s in favor of the variance. Mr. Lyden stated that if the variance is granted, the merit of the variance is due to the soils. He read the letter from the Rice Creek Watershed District regarding the soil information. He stated the basis of the variance is the poor soil. He indicated he is willing to put siding on the 1/6 of the building that can be seen. Mayor Bergeson advised an audience member, Mr. Rafferty, that he will not allow his comments because he is a member of the Planning and Zoning Board. He stated it is not appropriate for the Council to negotiate the design of the building at a public meeting. He stated the variance request can be tabled for further review. He asked for clarification regarding denial of the request. Staff advised the application cannot be submitted for one year if it is denied unless the new application addresses the reason why it was originally denied. Council Member Carlson stated a member of the Planning and Zoning Board addressed the Council at a previous meeting as a resident. The City Attorney advised members of City Boards can address the Council as a resident. Council Member Dahl requested a poll be taken of the Council Members before the request is tabled. Mayor Bergeson advised a poll can be taken relating to how each Council Member will vote as the request is presented. Council Member O'Donnell stated he is leaning toward denial of the request. He stated he has questions regarding other alternatives to the siding material, the cost of a wood frame building over metal, and what is best for the neighbors. He stated it is probably preferable to the neighbors that the boat be stored in a building. However, at this point he would deny the request. Council Member Carlson stated she would also deny the request. She stated she needs something specifically saying that a wood building cannot be build on this particular soil. The main issue is setting a precedence within the City. She added that she strongly believes all residents should have an opportunity to speak to any issue, even if they are members of City Boards. Mayor Bergeson stated that he would deny the request as it has been presented. He would, however, be in favor of a pole structure vs. a slab structure. He stated he can't find a reason to fit the variance and criteria for outside materials. 9 COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2001 Council Member Dahl indicated she would support the request. She stated she has a pole barn. Other types of structures would stick out in this neighborhood. There are also other pole barns in the area. She stated she did not get information in her packet regarding the Rice Creek Watershed District's opinion on the soil. Mr. Lyden is accommodating the City and the City,should meet him half way. She indicated she does want an answer about how many other parcelsiereare in the City relating to a precedence being set. Council Member Reinert stated he had hoped an agreement on the siding could be met. He indicated he would allow the variance if that happens. He stated he also agrees that a structureto store the boat is better for the neighbors. Mayor Bergeson stated that if he had written the ordinance, everyone would have a pole barn. He advised Mr. Lyden he can withdraw the application temporarily or move ahead. Mr. Lyden indicated he is agreeable to tabling the request if the Council is receptive to discussions to explore further middle ground. Mayor Bergeson advised Mr. Lyden to have discussions with staff regarding acceptable building materials. Council Member Dahl inquired about the resolution for the variance. Staff advised the City Attorney has suggested the City use resolutions for all Council decisions. The resolutions will be used on a regular basis. Council Member Dahl asked if Mr. Lyden can submit an application before a year is up if the resolution is not used. Staff advised that if the request is denied, Mr. Lyden cannot submit another application whether the resolution is used or not. The City Attorney advised any denial cannot be resubmitted for one year. The City Administrator stated staff does not have information regarding the number of five (5) or less acre parcels within the City. She stated a consultant would be necessary and asked for Council direction. Council Member Dahl inquired about a map that has that information. Staff advised they are not aware of a map with that information. Council Member Dahl stated she will get the map from Anoka County. The City Attorney advised the City must take action within 60 days of the application date. He stated that if the request is tabled and the 60 day action period is affected, Mr. Lyden must agree to an extension. Council Member Carlson advised she does support resolutions for Council decisions. She stated her concern is that all five (5) points were included. She asked if having more information is better than 10 COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2001 not enough. The City Attorney stated it is tough for staff to contemplate what the Council wants included in a resolution. The resolution is just a draft for the City to have a legal framework to take action. Staff added that the information in the resolution is taken from the City ordinance. Staff advised they will confer with the City Attorney regarding the procedure to be used in the future. Mayor Bergeson stated it is appropriate to make a motion to table with a date reference. Staff advised the City will be running into the 60 day deadline if the request is tabled. Staff advised they will send a formal letter to Mr. Lyden regarding the extension. Mr. Lyden indicated he is agreeable to an extension. Council Member Reinert moved to table Resolution No. 01— 02, Variance Request by Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive, until Mr. Lyden can work with City staff about possible siding on the pole barn. When the information is received, the request will be put back on the agenda. The City Attorney advised a date should be included in the motion. Council Member Reinert moved to table Resolution No. 01— 02, Variance Request by Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive, to the February 12, 2001, Council meeting. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 01— 01, Approving Final Plat, Highland Meadows West 2 "d Addition, Jeff Smyser (3/5 Vote Required) — Staff advised Highland Meadows West 2nd Addition includes land within the northern portion of Highland Meadows West. The 2nd Addition will create four (4) lots: two (2) new single family lots and two (2) lots, which contain existing houses. It will also create a 50 ft. extension of Marilyn Drive. The City Council approved the preliminary plat for the 2nd Addition on December 11, 2000. The final plat drawing submitted December 7, 2000 conforms to the preliminary plat. The development agreement and securities have been assembled. The title information is acceptable to the City Attorney. The three (3) conditions of approval will be met through the City's normal project review and monitoring. This includes the requirement that no further development will occur in the large outlot unless the development plan addresses safe and efficient circulation in the area. Council Member Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 01— 01, as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 01— 01 can be found in the City Clerk's office. PUBLIC HEARING, Bluebill Ponds Utility and Street Improvements, John Powell — Staff advised a meeting has been scheduled for 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 11, 2001 to discuss road and utility assessment issues for the effected Mar Don Acres residents. Therefore, staff recommended continuation of the Public Hearing for Bluebill Ponds to the January 22, 2001, City Council meeting. 11 Planning & Zoning Board December 13, 2000 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive, Variance Staff presented the application by explaining Chris Lyden owns 4.07 acres of property, zoned rural, at 6275 Holly Drive. Since the ordinance requires a minimum of ten acres in the rural zoning district, this property is a pre- existing non - conforming lot of record. Mr. Lyden would like to construct a 34 -foot by 64 -foot pole barn on the property using metal siding and roofing material. The Zoning Ordinance specifically prohibits metal siding and roofing material on properties less than five (5) acres in size. The proposed construction will meet the square footage requirement and setback requirements. Staff reviewed the findings of fact that need to be met for variance consideration and indicated staff does not believe this variance criteria can be met in this case since Mr. Lyden can construct a wood frame building, on footings with . =�< ab, that would have a similar effect to a post frame building although it may be cosy Staff advised it has received numerous requests for such construction ouraged the variance procedure because in most cases, the reques on the additional construction costs. Staff presented its analysis of the request, n...� t ' �. icant has described his hardship as follows: 1. Pole barn type 2. Pole barn type mid - engine all 3. Pole barn type construction is construction, w wood day constructs is property due to questionable soils. ent floor, is necessary to preserve 1958 o moisture factors. reduce threat of loss from grass fires. Mr. Johnson inqui s a. • ng the questionable soil issue and asked if they had been recently tested, or i " ' soil was involved. Mr. Smyser stated he is unable to answer that question but, perhap he applicant could provide that information. Mr. Johnson noted a building that conforms to the Code can be constructed without a slab. He asked if that type of building can be constructed on questionable soils. Mr. Smyser stated he does not know. Mr. Corson asked if the concern is the corrugated siding due to the image and desire to have accessory buildings match the appearance of the house. Mr. Smyser stated that is correct as well as an attempt to keep less rural sized lots from being covered with pole barns since they are typically not the most aesthetically pleasing structures. He noted that pole barns are allowed on larger sized rural parcels. Mr. Zych asked if the property behind the applicant's land remains undeveloped so it would not infringe on a neighbor's rights. Mr. Smyser stated the surrounding property is wetland and he doubts a house could be built on it. Planning & Zoning Board December 13, 2000 Page 3 Mr. Rafferty noted the five -acre requirement and criteria of hardship on the owner based on the size of the lot. He stated it clearly appears that beyond the western half of the property, it is not buildable for anything. Directly to the north, it is clearly all wetland. Mr. Rafferty noted the City goes the extra mile to get permissions from the neighbors so they are aware of the request, but the ordinance draws some "lines in the sand" to protect the interests of the City for future development. Mr. Rafferty stated he spoke with the surrounding land owners and one neighbor, who has a large investment, stated he has seen these plans and agrees with the request if the pole barn is located on the southern portion. Mr. Rafferty asked if the front elevation would contain a formal setting such as a concrete apron. Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he would like to make comment. Chris Lyden, applicant, stated it was not his plan to put a slab t of the building but he has been considering some type of apron that the overhe E e;soor .uld come down on He stated if it is the consent of the Board that a slab sh. �` ' e + ' he would do so. Mr. Rafferty stated his concern that the front elevat passerby. He suggested that a two to three foo Rafferty reviewed the recent request from t costs of the structure with a metal seam r Mr. Schilling arrived at 6:43 p.m. formal appearance to the rovide that aspect. Mr. Bank and inquired about the Mr. Lyden stated the issue is - st, but one of providing a quality building for his antique boat. He expl. construction as proposed would be more costly and he believes a wood type s a concrete floor, due to its weight, is not appropriate for the site due to the ' . soils. Mr. Lyden advised that his front steps and other concrete slabs ha elevation so he believes a pole type structure is appropriate for thi oil. With regard to the antique boat, Mr. Lyden explained that moisture woul •' stroy it so the recommendation is for strong roof ventilation and no concrete floor. Chair Schaps stated his concern that during his eleven years on the Planning Commission, they have denied more than a dozen pole barn requests on this size of acreage. He stated he understands the soils issue, but no scientific or expert analysis on that aspect has been submitted. Because of that, he does not see how the specific findings of fact can be made to support a variance request while avoiding the establishment of a precedent. Chair Schaps noted the first criteria is whether the property can be put to a reasonable use without the variance. Thus, he can not conclude a wood barn cannot be constructed. The second criteria deals with special circumstances to the soils, which is not present since no scientific information has been presented. Chair Schaps stated the third criteria is to not convey a special privilege, which he believes approval would do since no scientific data has been provided. The fourth criteria to meet the intent of the ordinance has also not been met and upheld three times recently based on the aesthetic issues with a pole barn. Planning & Zoning Board December 13, 2000 Page 4 Mr. Lyden stated he is aware of those concems and has taken that information into consideration when designing the pole barn. He stated that cost is not the issue, rather, it is the quality of the building. He noted the added aesthetics resulting from the 5:12 roof pitch of the pole barn to match that of the house, the wainscot style of siding, two foot overhang, and overhead garage style door. Mr. Lyden pointed out the proposed location is right next to his house so he will be constructing a quality structure. Mr. Lyden stated he understands the concern related to aesthetics. However, no one will build within one - quarter mile to the north or within hundreds of acres to the west. To the south, the property owner is buffered by 75 feet of pine trees and has provided his consent. Mr. Lyden stated this proposal will not be a negative impact to the residents or future development of the City. Chair Schaps stated a reading of the ordinance indicates the cs' °;_, 's not met. Mr. Lyden stated the siding proposed for the pole barn ' gh e`'ty than what is on his house. Mr. Rafferty asked if this will be an aluminum explained there is a 50 year warranty on th other quality aspects including the wainsc Mr. Rafferty commented on the on his house and asked if this is siding would consider. Mr. Schilling asked ab indicted he is not awar and maintenance Lyden stated it is and and materials He advised of the paint. es he has experienced with cedar siding ing someone interested in maintenance free of an EIFS, a plasterboard siding. Mr. Lyden t siding material. Mr. Schilling stated the issues of quality would be met with EIFS. Mr. Lyden stated hi ain concern and reason for the variance request relates to the soils. Ms. Lane noted the front of the structure will be visible from the street and asked if a house -style of siding can be placed on the front elevation of the pole barn so it is more attractive and better matches the house. Mr. Lyden stated that may be a viable option and explained that his plans are to use a clay colored siding and then reside the house next summer so it matches the pole barn. Chair Schaps stated he is unable to vote to support this request tonight for the reasons he stated. He suggested more investigation needs to be done on other siding treatments. He noted that the Ordinance specifically states a prohibition to "corrugated siding and roof." Mr. Lyden stated that term may be up for interpretation and he does not believe it refers to the type of metal he is proposing. Planning & Zoning Board December 13, 2000 Page 5 Mr. Schilling stated that he is also not able to vote in support of the request tonight but believes there are other siding materials that could be considered that may be more acceptable. Mr. Schilling noted there are also different types of footings and systems that could address poor soil types. Mr. Lyden stated he respects everyone's opinion and would like a vote taken tonight. Mr. Corson asked where the septic system is located. Mr. Lyden stated his first pole barn location choice would have been to the north, however, the septic system is on the north side and he wanted to keep his options open in case he needs a new septic system. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to recommend approval of the variance request of Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive, to construct a 34 -foot by 64 -foot pole barn on his 4.07 acres at 6275 Holly Drive based on the rationale that the variance criteria are met and conditioned on the following: 1. Providing a minimum four foot concrete apron. The motion was supported by Ms. Lane. Ms. Lane noted her support for the varianc undevelopable wetland that surrounds the e large amount of 's property. Mr. Corson asked Mr. Lyden to in tion of using EIFS which he believes would improve the aesthetics of Mr. Rafferty stated he has potential for damage. maintenance free mate Rafferty stated h vertical or horizon pro•uct in use and does not support its use due to the n g; and the trend for construction in aluminum and does not want to include a requirement for EIFS. Mr. ieve it makes a difference whether the siding stripe is Mr. Schilling stated ` "I S is widely used, successfully, in many commercial structures. He pointed out that metal siding will also dent and rust. Mr. Schilling noted there are obvious direct ordinance regulations pertaining to the use of materials and the Board is looking for a way to help Mr. Lyden. He stated he believes EIFS is a viable option so he is unable to vote for the application without the inclusion of that requirement. Mr. Corson asked about the option of using a rock or metal material on the bottom portion of the structure with EIFS on the top portion. Chair Schaps asked Mr. Rafferty if he believes this variance request meets all of the criteria required in the ordinance for a variance consideration. Mr. Rafferty answered affirmatively. Motion failed 3 ayes (Lane, Rafferty, Zych), 3 nays (Corson, Schilling, Chair Schaps), 1 abstain (Johnson since he was not present for a portion of the discussion). Planning & Zoning Board December 13, 2000 Page 6 Mr. Corson stated he voted against the motion since EIFS was not being considered as an alternative. B. Marvin Emly, 590 62nd Street, Variance Staff presented the application by explaining Marvin Emly is requesting permission to construct a 28 -foot by 32 -foot accessory building on his property at 590 62nd Street which is zoned rural and consists of ten acres on the south side of 62nd Street containing his home and four (4) accessory buildings. One of the buildings was damaged in a storm this past summer and must be removed. Mr. Emly would like to replace it with the requested building, however, the Zoning Ordinance allows only three (3) accessory buildings on a parcel of property between ten and 20 acres in size. Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting the need for number of buildings and one from the section of the Ordin nonconforming structures. Staff reviewed the findings of fact that need to be indicated staff does not believe this variance c not justify a hardship other than financial. buildings and build one larger building th Ordinance. In response to Mr. Rafferty, Mr. Mr. Zych asked if the two stated he is not sure w combined since they applicant desire t ances, one from the ng to ce consideration and be iet in this case since it does ld remove the two accessory e within the requirements of the 'ned the grandfathered provision. an be combined to make it acceptable. Mr. Smyser unty would allow these two tax parcels to be ated by 62nd Street. It may also cause a problem should the the parcels. Mr. Zych asked if t ,i: oard can consider both parcels as if they were one parcel. Mr. Smyser noted the ap i 'scant has the right to sell the northern parcel which would leave this structure existing on the southern parcel. Discussion occurred regarding the options to attach the structures, possibly via a covered walkway. Mr. Smyser stated one possibility to avoid increasing the nonconformity is to construct the new structure as attached to Building #2 with the middle building being removed. Then it could be considered as one structure without increasing the nonconformity. Mr. Smyser explained that square footage is not an issue. Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he would like to make comment. Marvin Emly, applicant, stated he can tie Buildings #2 and #4 together into one large building but there is a distance between the two buildings. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION No. 2001 -02 RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FOR CHRIS LYDEN RESIDENCE AT 6275 Holly Drive, Lino Lakes, MN. WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City Council for a Variance from the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance at 6275 Holly Drive, Lino Lakes, MN., and WHEREAS, Section 3, Subd. 4.D.8.d.5) of the City Zoning Ordinance prohibits accessory buildings with metal corrugated siding or roof, except upon tool sheds less than four hundred (400) square feet in area, and Whereas, the same section of the Zoning Ordinance does not allow pole buildings, and WHEREAS, the applicant desires to build a pole building with metal corrugated siding and roof, and WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance provides that in considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a find of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes does not make those findings in relation to this request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the Variance requested is hereby DENIED. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CCM City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. / / 1 / (0002), Robert. 8. 8 , Sondra De Molts t / . ‘ ( 0003 ) e 4 4 / ., . AlvIr K. 8 8.4 De Notts 1. ti. '■,' ‘ k te 1 , ! 1 • Pondoge & I Flowage / 47,07 1 Easements 1 io City of t t, Lino La*" 1 Doc et 595478 i .s1; -4...- --- :_t _ _ _ _-• tc.te ..-:- _ _ 21_ _ _ __- -.:- ”. - / . . ■ ' .1v' : t IN 1. 1 • 1-1 1 1 44$ 24 300 • • - • • CENTER SEC. 33 acAtk, avow ----Nory • XA01,---HOLLY-A--" • 4 (4) Lt 9t 9t 1;t Ct Z tt 0 6 L 9 9 b e z of et 4t 91. 9t Lt 9t 61. oz ZZ '1 UNO LAKES J: Y 1 1 I ' HUMS ■ m 1 j ■■/■ 10 • 1 ■■n■ p ■��■ ■���■ ■ ■�■/■ ■ ■■■■ Emmun I ! I 1 ■■■ ■ 1 ! •��I•i ■ , , , ■^ , 1 I ! ■■■■■ ■■M■■ ERS ng fl I ■ t • -1 1 nn� ! VTT : ■�■■■ _ 1 I 1 • ■■■ ■■ ■ ■.`■■,`►7 ■/7 `'an.1111NIIIErrra ■■ ■■' . •E 1 u 1 ; m■ ' uM um••■ LNIVI s.lt 7•� T n ! 1 E In : I . w EIMMIN •p �rMIn • `■ EEr t i• 1 ' —I -1 ; , , I • 1 a *U • i 1 -i-i--! , , 11►U 1i■ • _' r ! J. ; - • I Emma i -1 : ! 1 h -, 1 ■■ ■■ • ! ■ I Mn C■u � GnCI■y ■ ■CMS ■r 1 ;Y■'■' '�'nEN I_ ACC �aiC 4'■ �■. -! ! . II n■u■•■•mu i■ � ; ■■m nCii■■■■ I ! ! ■■ •.�• •EI ■.■n■ ■eSIMS ' •I NPR ■� Cui r• � Mr nu u • ! ;'- 1 ; 1 ■a�1il ,sr,s...i . ■ rErr•MI 1 ! ! ■C■ Mui.E ■ Eni•r•■ u . +IY■■/■■ ! 1 !� 1 ! n mu ua._1_ ■■ 1g.■nna .■n ■ ■RS■i c3 .■■■■n ■ ■ ■M: ■ ■■M■■ ■■ -�11_ -1 1 1 1 1 1. mM ■. I 1 1 1 ■■10■■m■mW 1, •••CCCU ■■C:C 1 ' 1 ' ' u■CCC■■C:' CCC■wgg.a't/C C: ' ■ � i' E • ■■amismu •••••• ■. I I ■- ! 1 :■ ! 1 I 1 !-.� ' f�■ ■ a!►CZINI.J ■M■ . ! mu■IU ■1 , : 'I! : i ■Cn 1n'I:�i i M 1_ _IT1,��! mom 1 ■■W 1 1 1 i 111 ! 1 . ■ ■� F U. I J ! �m■ ■u as = ■■C /■ CC , 1 ! ! ■■■■■ 1 ' , , : ■ ILE� �■■GI 1 p� MUM 1 • ■■m■111=1 '- H ! I uul1 ; : 1 1-� u •n ■ REM•11• ■■■ ■r ■C` ■■■ ■ ■ ■EUrurE ■■■ ! ■/■■■■■■ II ..lini ■■■■■■ n■ ■ ..6.1...2.01,4_1 ; 1 1 m ■•Ci ' ■ , j I , � I ■ C �■■■ a■ �C■o■■■n 1- , 1 1 1 MN 1 1 I • an I 1 .: , • I A'/n■ MINER EVA-1 , . MIMI • II . lir. T; , ... , ,_ , „if.., . , , , _r_. i ...• . . i ! " I� 1 ., 1 u/n n• ; 1 L _ 111111.• IAN • ' ' i L l+ 1'-1 f I i II '' '- T ! ! _ , 1 1 I , I, _I 1 ;i 1 '-1 ; 1 j_ I f 1 IT tL _, _ C■n■nC■m _i :1 �!I 1 11 I 1 1 ' I ? I - , T ! i I! ■ !,' ! 1 • ••••••=11111111111111 ■■•■ __) i I 1 i 1 n ' 1 "TT- 1 1 • , _1 • I . i ! ::111 UJ i , , 1 1 i ■CCC■ EMI ' ; , . 111 ! 1 1 EMI 1 1 -TT . `; - .mamM i -4- , ■ 1 ■ 1 i UK= • ■rwmn ••• C•. Ili : 1-7r Ems i l ; ! . , __,.,_...u._, iJ I t - , , :m■ '"j u■■E-1 1- I ' -4 ,- _. •'T_..�._.__� I • I ! i -1' .+ -_ J _ -ryJ. �� -' -�� 1 -j � . 1 1 , :1 j i i Ti 1T-' • • • j ! 1 /1 Lr -T ■ 1 a ! ! I t ! MOM 1 ! • Nnlor•••u•••••• ■�r • U■f u► ■■ ■■11■■�■ ■ ■ - I■N• mI NEE UCMR ■■ ■ I T ■ ® ■Cp C■ �n � m■■ ■■■■a■0■■ ' ! �■m. ■ ■■ i •am Mums ■•u sums G• CC Ia■Im NNUa•• ■ ■�.EU 1 1 1 ■LINEN■�■u■■CCC. ENNEMIp■ IIMI■ n■■■■ ! 1 1 IMINEm $UU ■I■■ � ■CCC C•NM■ ME i••• °••• °11:2rEE11•Bi•NEE ! m.. n ■ ■■ ! ■■••••■U- n•••i 1 KRU l .m/■ -7":.••••••• �•Cm.MI ■■■■■■�C i•11u ■u■u/i■■111M11� •••••••••• ■•M bellim M; rmnuNE N C _� ! 1 uMIE +-Err ■ ,1 •••■ ■■u ■� - 11»aa " ■..... gm ■ ■ .1■uu ■ ■ ■■ �• ■ 1 /■■� i ■C ■ ■■■n■■ am mmu I ' �nC ■ ■/■■/ i ■ ■ ■ •WIEN ■ ■mnC� ■■ ■ ■■. ��C ■■■■ ■ ■■ nm• !T�•n•nm•• 'link •UA ■■■■r1■■■ ua•CC MIME ■n CC I■ moron.. ■: ru m■ .■a■ 1 ' -�N.E ■CC ■■m■ Er11rI■t�rE■Ewrr .1 rCCCC::CC.■a uu■Nr ■■••MME■C•un11E mEMilr. ! I■InC B■uI,■ 1 I ...EC„` ! �- 1 u■■mCm..nC .m.un.m... ■E.E° r�� . '°YRi ®� -_� 1 1 : _ ! IMIE■ ■■■■ I .••u••••• "-t� 1 ! I ■ ■ ■•rr_•E •••�•■ n •••N• EM■E■ EMIrEMrMI■% EN 11 ■ ®O_ IM►VDIQip a■ EM■E ■ ■mErE ! E ■m.. v�aI■ ■uE■ �1 ■■n �■ ■•n•r•J•N11r■ ■•■I EN ■ ■■II■ •iil�•CCC•E■M■SIMI L ■ /. CE••• ■ ■n 1 1 nwMM•r/E M� NIL I� K. ■EE•••MIr •••••••• 1 nn ■ ■ENIIN ■ ■• M�`N■ NIL- - ■E■ ■E EIEIE ■REIN■• ••••••n ■11■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■E CwE Cm N•11n•uu•••n •nn ■IMmM/E■•MI••• awnnr m•IU{i•■•nm REM ■ ■n■ ■n■ nu11EMn•mE , ■IEOC•I dEE■M /j■EEmI •E■' 1111■ ■NE ■■■■■■ `�nEII�M■ nWI� ■Mlmunll au a I I maim If h It■1�� Mr11a►u■Inu.Mnr •II i111 :■C� mnmEEnlJ■E■v ■C•C••C•: •u■ n ■■ ■n■ ! 1 m EILAIR p11v ! 1 ! 1 ■ 11 Ei1■u•Gir 1 ■ ■. ■E I 1 ! ! ■wR/ ■ ■I■En•••••• /EEm�I� MU ■C nE••n•n•• ■ ■ ■bmEBE M■EIH■■ ■ ■ M ■EII ■ ■ ■ ■1Y■n•1:7 EME■YE 1•111111•111011 ■oEIDEIE , u 111111111•11111•11-11111 EIMUM •r1uEm.a 1 II■ =.-'EU iallIE . ■ES atV�lEauMI■ m 1 • T 1 ' CMIY■R- MICR= ■•CC•11/E11 EiCI■C■� ruNraaEluM■ 11��o■ n ". 'm WA “11111•1111111 ECn■■I MINIM m •y ma u■■MnM■I: MEE I M�Mm u •■ °n W • °'EI■mmu 1 iimu _ NKEE•a�1■Em u ---- !.NW11C� ! : • 1 IU i.� . ■I ru _ I J_ E�Ilutl• ' Iu ■ EErI_ , I 1 1 M■ �1■E ■ ■m --- 1 Ti_'_1 imam ■ wgg nu i ' i•mi11■■o mE ■ I N ■E ■ mu nu an ■n� ' 1 ; • 1 I mE■n 1�i EE■11■u■ iiiAMM :.cM•■•M■ ■ ■vi•■ ■ ■uMI• . 1 =1-` MMUNI E■ii■uEC■■U *N1C • ' : • • ' MN ; u NEEn 1pu MI / ! 1 ' : i ' ' ! n1J •vm■Ea'u•■CUpCU■�1• n 1 n■■■�■•n�11EBEE , 1 n ■Ia tl. _iw:g,i �rrNrN11N!�•�C•n■Mm•I• • . nnal■IINE1 ■ MCIIILI! WW1 mu ROUE m• � m ■ nm 1 •MIn■um�■' •■iE. a ■■■a MI ■ ' EWE ndi ----ia irdILIllll m EFr ■MI.•Nu 1 1 i- MEmEm ! Ena �n • 1 n n 1 1 Em••••• •r°•C 1 upE m[7m raliWiE 1 i I 1 i• • i $ -1 ! •E■E■ u W 1 ' u• uE ■EE EMI■ nnm■■11 ■_MI■1111■■I� ■E■E ■ ■ ■N ■■ ■■■ ■■ IUUU ■E■mE MINIM )7.. • nMapmr • 1, •. ' n 1 INrrN !1 1 , ■ ■M mEN 1 . ' ;_ _ f- I� ' . • 1 t • I 1 i 1 1 1 1 •1 _p���_�n■m■MI ■■Mar ■ ■ :� 1 : j i I 1 Rall111•En■NEEm Inummummumusno _ t■ ■ ■rrly • 11 ' L' 1 1 ' 1 1 �! . ! : MIMI 1MEU■■■E111■ rang rang muEUI■ MImENUrn ■u 1' EMIMrr1 fIMIMI■► i� 11 i1t l 1 • 1 1 •• 1 1 J • : 1 ! • 1 �� - i 1 I 1 1 1 ! r ! ! n WA now i ! ! ! ! ! 1 : MIM ■■n ii. •i 1 ■ i Mill ! y 1 : I 1 - MI • • ! m 1 1 1 i ' , ! : 011; 1 1 I ......; .I�'c�. 1 f�l - , Mn r ! , ,T, ...._. • i...L: 1, --T7 • , ; I : , • ; : ■ 1• I _M!m" • ! ■ 1 I ...... Iii _.. -.. I! itii!■ - L �1, 1 _ 1 ,.,-_ i I 1 , i 11 • ? 1 ""'T' -- ' —Lr-L— -T V_ _ -_ -jj- 1- 1_ '70UU ' T : , , 11 ! 1 ' IT- , i : ! 1 ! ;1 7-77-7 ' 1 t� (�ryryryJ, t■11111 .l of et 4t 91. 9t Lt 9t 61. oz ZZ '1 UNO LAKES J: Y — 0-epev-o NOV 1 3 ?POO C;TY OF t..N3 LAKES / /.,,.. -7.eet-ed,, /,`,-, t,- ,ew el 4aeeW ,gce-6%.. S / 444 , 3. �eo ..-,-", G'd-e .--‘‘--e-ee;--i z-Ae ,� 07/ / -- A /" % `. :�;� - to -- re—z,{� „ c � r 6-7 .-,/,---0 Aier-e" //te, e e - e - e . x' e eti z. „"z&-tz ,,,z-te re-2-7 ei,z,1 #6.7 z - , /. :1 7, ,— ' -K- e, t ” . . -7 - - L,e __O �-C ,,/ 4Z7 _..zeep_e_ . ff.,, /#7_,c.e,... .,,,',;c,(4- 6---c-/- 7 i�/ -fi r i��� d *4 NOV 1 3 2000 r yry GF UNO LAKES NOV 1 3 2000 CITY OF LO LAKES To Whom It May Concern: Walters Buildings Is a Manufacturer and Builder of Several Building Lines Utilizing Different Construction Techniques, Including; Steel Frame, Post Frame, Stud Wall, Masonry, And Grade Beam . We Recommend the Use of Post Frame Construction For Building at The Residence Of Chris Lyden in Lino Lakes MN. Slab On Grade Stud Built Construction Is Not Conducive to The Lot Due To Deep Fill and Variable Water Conditions Which are Likely To Cause Frost Heave and Thickened Slab Edge Footing Deteriation . Post Frame Buildings Have The Unique Ability To Support Themselves On Unstable Soil Due To Their Horizontal 2" x 6" Wall Girts and Roof Purlins Spanning 16' — 24'. This Horizontal Construction Ties The Building End For End Minimizing the Effects Of Frost Heave On The Structure. If You Have Further Questions About The Usage Of Post Frame Buildings Please Contact Me at 651/ 982- 9352. Curtis Miers Construction Management Walters Buildings NOV 1 3 Z000 CITY OF €..eNO LAKES 11 -9 -2000 CHRIS AND LONA LYDEN HAVE MY PERMISSION TO BUILD A 36X64 POLE BARN OF METAL CONSTRUTION AT 6275 HOLLY DRIVE WEST IN LINO LAKES. Page 1 Nov 1 3 2000 C OF La,f3 LAKES • I • w T r T 0 -0 (A 0 ' co 0 U) 0 leuod 'eels saaidom RIMIESKIMI Raging= ail 1 (D, (D CD 0 REC NOV 1 3 2000 C:TY OF L:NO LAES 0 40- 0) 0) 4- F17-CEW7710. (f) T NOV 1 3 2000 0 C;TY OF LNG LAKE'S ( 1 ) \t- '11■41110 C\1 a) (7-) 2-) • (;) 0 — xo .0 0 RECt:fan NOV 1 3 2000 CITY OF LtN0 LAKES