Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03/12/2001 Council Packet
AGENDA UPDATED AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 6:00 P.M. CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday March 12, 2001 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call: Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) March 12, 2001 (Check No. 61253 through 61355 in the amount of $204,677.96) ii) Centennial Fire District B) Consider Resolution No. 2001 -34 Approving St. Joseph 3.2 Beer Permit. C) Consider Resolution 2001 -35 Transferring Funds from the Area and Unit Fund to the Water Operation Fund. D) Consider Resolution 2001 -44 Authorizing the Closing of 1994 and 1995 Construction Capital Projects Funds 2. Open Mike 3. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) Consider Resolution Nos. 01 05 and 01 19, Proposed Utility Rates for 2001 2003, (3/5 vote required) John Powell Removed B) Consider Resolution No. 2001 -33, Considering Adopting the 2001 Recreation Fund Operating Budgets, (3/5 vote required) Al Rolek 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia Page 1 AGENDA A) Approve the 2000 Department of Public Safety Annual Report, (3/5 vote required) Sergeant Kurt Rausch B) Approve COPS More Grant, (3/5 vote required) Sergeant Bill Hammes (Follow Friday) 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) Consideration of Easement Agreement with Qwest Wireless, LLC, Rick DeGardner 7. Community Development Department Report A) Resolution No. 01 -39, Terminating Assessment Agreement, H &L Mesabi, (3/5 vote required) Mary Alice Divine B) Resolution No. 01 -36, Rescinding Site and Building Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit, H & L Mesabi, (3/5 vote required), John Powell C) Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for Summit Fire Protection (3/5 vote required), Mary Alice Divine D) Resolution No. 01 -37, Approving Minor Subdivision for Summit Fire Protection, (3/5 vote required) Cindy Sherman of NAC E) Resolution No. 01 -38, Approving Site and Building Plan, Summit Fire Protection, (3/5 vote required) Cindy Sherman of NAC F) Second Reading, Ordinance 04 -01, Amending Zoning Ordinance to Allow Accessory Buildings in Industrial and Commercial Districts, (4/5 vote required), John Powell G) Resolution 01- 45 , Approving Minor Subdivision of VFW property, Apollo Drive, (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell H) Resolution 01- 40, Receive Feasibility Report, Saddle Club Utility and Street Improvements, (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell I) Resolution 01- 41, Order Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the 21st Avenue Street and Utility Improvements, (4/5 Vote Required), John Powell J) Resolution 01- 42, Order Preparation of a Study for the 2002/2003 Street Reconstruction Projects, (4/5 Vote Required), John Powell K) Resolution 01- 43, Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Black Duck Lift Station Improvements, (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell 8. Unfinished Business A) February 5, 2001, Special Council Work Session Minutes Page 2 AGENDA B) February 21, 2001, Council Work Session Meeting Minutes C) February 26, 2001, Council Meeting Minutes 9. New Business 10. Community Calendar, March 13, through March 26, 2001: A) Wednesday, March 14, 2001, 6:30 p.m., Planning & Zoning Board Meeting B) Wednesday, March 21, 2001, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session C) Monday, March 26, 2001, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 11. Close meeting to discuss litigation results and 12. Adjourn Revised 3/09/01 RDG 12:01 p.m. Page 3 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY MARCH 12, 2001 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration of Minutes of November 13, 2000 3. Public Hearing: Proposed Business Subsidy to Summit Fire Protection 3A. Consideration of Resolution No. 01 -01, Approving a Business Subsidy for Summit Fire Protection 4. Consideration of Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and Summit Fire Protection 5. Consideration of Resolution No. 01 -02, Declaring Default and Terminating Development Agreement, H &L Mesabi 6. Adjourn • CITY OF LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES DATE MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT : November 13, 2000 : J. Bergeson, D. Carlson, C. Dahl, J. O'Donnell, J. Reinert : None : Mary Divine and Dan Tesch CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF MONDAY, AUGUST 14, 2000 EDA Member Dahl moved to approve the August 14, 2000, minutes, as presented. EDA Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED BUSINESS SUBSIDY TO NORTH AMERICAN COMPOSITES Ms. Divine advised North American Composites, a subsidiary of Interplastic Corporation, has requested tax increment financing (TIF) assistance in the amount of $122,250 for the purpose of constructing a 25,000 square foot distribution facility in the Apollo Business Center. North American Composites is a national distributor of polyester resins, fiberglass, and related products to the composites industry. The local distributor will employ 21 at this new facility, including management, warehouse, drivers, office and sales positions. The company has committed to hiring at least three new employees within two years at no less than $25,000 annual salary, plus benefits. EDA President Bergeson opened the public hearing at 6:07 p.m. EDA Member Carlson moved to close the public hearing at 6:07 p.m. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 00 — 04 APPROVING A BUSINESS SUBSIDY FOR NORTH AMERICAN COMPOSITES Ms. Divine advised this resolution recognizes that North American Composites meets one or more of the goals and objectives outlined by the EDA in its business subsidy criteria. Those goals include: 1. Light industrial projects in the Apollo Business Center are consistent with the City's comprehensive plan designed to encourage economic growth and diversity. • • • 2. As part of the Lino Lakes Town Center, the projects moving into the park play a significant role in providing a critical mass of development to support retail and service businesses in the commercial center. 3. This project is also consistent with the City's need to recover the return on its investment in the existing infrastructure within the park. Ms. Divine advised this project will be receiving site and building play review later tonight by the City Council. It is recommended that approval of the business subsidy be contingent upon final approval of the project by the City Council. EDA Member Carlson asked which of the City's TIF Districts require the 10% contribution. Ms. Divine advised any economic development district requires the 10% contribution. EDA Member Reinert asked how the amount of TIF is derived. Ms. Divine advised the amount is derived from a number of scoring mechanisms that include land use, tax base, number of employees. Other factors include TIF capacity and the company's need. In this case, the amount came in approximately 10 -12% of their estimated market value. EDA Member Carlson moved to approve Resolution No. 00 — 04 contingent upon final approval of the project by the City Council. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN LINO LAKES EDA AND NORTH AMERICAN COMPOSITES Ms. Divine advised the development contract outlines the conditions for public assistance to North American Composites for the construction of a 25,000 square foot facility on 2.4 acres on the G.M. Development property in the Apollo Business Center. The proposed facility will have a minimum market value of $938,400 for a total of $42,000 in annual taxes (based on pay 2001 dollars). The costs for land, assessments and escrow are approximately $226,000. In this agreement, the City agrees to provide tax increment financing totaling $122,250 towards those costs. The agreement removes the assessments of $63,877 up front. The remaining pay- as -you- go TIF amounts to $58,373 for assistance with land write down and return of escrow. The City will be reimbursed first for the assessments from the available tax increment, and then the developer will receive the remaining increment. Estimated total pay back is in 2007. • • • This project is in TIF District 1 -9, which requires a 10% local contribution ($13,753). It is the City's intent to apply the interest lost on the assessments that were deferred until development occurred as the local contribution. EDA Member Reinert moved to approve the contract for private development between Lino Lakes EDA and North American Composites, as presented. EDA Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT EDA Member O'Donnell moved to adjourn. EDA Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Transcribed by: Kim Points TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 3 AGENDA ITEM 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 03/12/01 TOPIC: Public Hearing on the proposed business subsidy to Summit Fire Protection Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Summit Fire Protection, a company that designs, manufactures and installs fire suppression systems, has requested tax increment financing (TIF) assistance in the amount of $217,059 for the purpose of constructing a 30,000 square foot facility in the Apollo Business Center. Summit currently is the second largest fire protection company in Minnesota, and currently has locations in Savage, Roseville, Rochester and Fargo. The company plans to consolidate the Roseville and Savage locations into this new Lino Lakes facility. The company will employ approximately 60 at this new facility, including management, designers, sales positions and fabricators. The company has committed to hiring at least eight new employees within two years at no Tess than $22.00 per hour, plus benefits. A public hearing is required by statute when the EDA is considering granting a subsidy that exceeds $100,000. OPTIONS: 1. Open the public hearing 2. Continue the public hearing RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • Section 4.3. Certificate of Completion. (a) Promptly after completion of the Minimum Improvements in accordance with the Construction Plans and all terms of this Agreement, the Authority will furnish the Developer with a Certificate of Completion. The Certificate of Completion shall be in the form of Exhibit C attached hereto. Such certification by the Authority shall be a conclusive determination of satisfaction and termination of the agreements and covenants in this Agreement with respect to the obligations of the Developer to construct the Minimum Improvements and the date for the completion thereof (b) The Certificate of Completion provided for in this section 4.3 shall be in such form as will enable it to be recorded in the proper office for the recordation of deeds and other instruments pertaining to the Property. If the Authority refuses or fails to provide certification in accordance with the provisions of this section 4.3, the Authority shall, within ten 10 days after written request by the Developer, provide the Developer with a written statement, indicating in adequate detail in what respects the Developer has failed to complete the Minimum Improvements in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, or is otherwise in default, and what measures or acts it will be necessary, in the opinion of the Authority, for the Developer to take or perform in order to obtain such certification. (c) The construction of the Minimum Improvements shall be deemed to be completed when the Minimum Improvements are certified substantially completed by the architect of record and when the Minimum Improvements have received a certificate of occupancy from the City's building official. Section 4.4. Reconstruction of Minimum Improvements. If the Minimum Improvements are damaged or destroyed before or after completion thereof but before the Termination Date, the Developer agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, to reconstruct the Minimum Improvements so that the Minimum Improvements and the Property have a value at least equal to the Minimum Market Value. The Minimum Improvements shall be reconstructed in accordance with the Construction Plans, or such modifications thereto as may be requested by the Developer and approved by the Authority and the City. Section 4.5. Property Taxes; Special Assessments. After closing on the Property pursuant to Article III hereof, the Developer agrees to pay as they become due on the Property and the Minimum Improvements all ad valorem taxes and special assessments, other than the Special Assessments referenced in section 5.1 of this Agreement. The Developer shall not cause the Property to be removed from the public tax rolls or to become exempt from assessment for general real estate taxes by reason of any conveyance, lease, abatement or other action prior to the Termination Date. ARTICLE V Public Assistance Section 5.1. Special Assessments. The City has constructed the Public Improvements for the benefit of the Property and other parcels and would have been authorized by law to levy Special Assessments against the Property in the principal amount of $87,780. The Authority shall assume RHB-192977v2 8 LN140 -75 responsibility for payment of the Special Assessments relating to the Property at the time of issuance of the Certificate of Completion for the Minimum Improvements. The Authority shall first use Tax Increment collected with regard to the Minimum Improvements to pay to the City the principal of the Special Assessments, plus interest at an annual rate of 8 percent from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion on the unpaid balance. After full payment to the City of the principal and interest on the Special Assessments and reimbursement of the Authority's Administrative Expenses, the Authority shall use Available Tax Increment to pay the Developer the Property Write Down and reimbursement of the Administrative Fee pursuant to sections 5.2 and 5.3 of this Agreement. Payment of Available Tax Increment shall be remitted by the Authority to the Developer on or before February 1 and August 1 of each year, with an estimated beginning of August 1, 2005, until the Termination Date. Section 5.2. Administrative Fee. The Developer has paid the Authority the Administrative Fee in the amount of $5,000 to cover a portion of the Authority's expenses in negotiating this Agreement and other costs associated with the project. The Authority agrees to reimburse the Developer for the Administrative Fee out of Available Tax Increment, after first satisfying its obligation regarding the Special Assessments and reimbursement of the Administrative Expenses. Section 5.3. Property Write Down. In order to facilitate the financial feasibility of the development of the Property and in consideration for the Developer's fulfillment of its covenants and obligations under this Agreement, the Authority agrees to write down the cost of the Property for the Developer. The Developer represents that it has entered into an agreement to purchase the • Property from the Seller for $333,601. The Developer agrees to provide the Authority a copy of the purchase agreement to verify the price of the Property. The Authority agrees to reimburse the Developer $124,279 out of Available Tax Increment as the Property Write Down. Section 5.4. No Representation Regarding Available Tax Increment. The Authority's financial commitment under this Agreement regarding the Property Write Down and reimbursement of the Administrative Fee is a revenue obligation only and will be paid by the Authority only after sufficient Tax Increment has been received by the Authority to fully pay the Special Assessments payable to the City, including principal and interest on the unpaid balance, and to reimburse the Authority's Administrative Expenses. The Authority makes no representations or warranties that the Available Tax Increment will be sufficient to pay the Developer for the Property Write Down and to reimburse the Administrative Fee. The Developer acknowledges that Available Tax Increment is subject to calculations by the County and changes in State law, including proposals to modify the property tax system regarding fmancing of public education which may be considered or enacted by the Minnesota legislature in 2001. Some or all of the Property Write Down and Administrative Fee reimbursement may not be made prior to the Termination Date due to insufficient Available Tax Increment. The Developer also acknowledges that the estimates of Available Tax Increment which may have been made by the Authority or its agents, officers or employees are estimates only and are not intended for reliance by the Developer. RHB- 192977v2 LN140 -75 9 (i) For purposes of this Article X, the Developer includes any party to whom the Developer leases the Property or Minimum Improvements. Section 10.2. Job and Wage Goals. Within two years after the earlier of the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion or the date the Developer occupies the Property (the "Compliance Date "), the Developer shall cause to be created at least eight new full -time equivalent jobs on the Property at no less than $22.00/hour, exclusive of benefits. For purposes of this Article X, a full time job means one which requires at least 371/2 hours of work per week. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, if the wage and job goals described in this Section 10.2 are met by the Compliance Date, those goals are deemed satisfied despite the Developer's continuing obligations under Sections 10.1(0 and 10.4. The Authority may, after a public hearing, extend the Compliance Date by up to one year, provided that nothing in this Section 10.2 will be construed to limit the Authority's legislative discretion regarding any such extension. Section 10.3. Remedies. If the Developer fails to meet the goals described in Section 10.1(c), the Developer shall repay the Authority a pro rata share of the amount of the subsidy granted by this Agreement, plus interest on said amount at the implicit price deflator as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.50, subd. 2, accrued from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion to the date of payment. The repayment shall be made by the Developer within thirty (30) days of written demand by the Authority. The term pro rata share means percentages calculated as follows: • (i) if the failure relates to the number of jobs, the jobs required less the jobs created, divided by the jobs required; • (ii) if the failure relates to wages, the number of jobs required less the number of jobs that meet the required wages, divided by the number of jobs required; (iii) if the failure relates to maintenance of the manufacturing facility in accordance with Section 10.1(0, 60 less the number of months of operation as a manufacturing facility (where any month in which the facility is in operation for at least 15 days constitutes a month of operation), commencing on the date of the Certificate of Completion ending with the date the facility ceases operation as determined by the Authority, divided by 60; and (iv) if more than one of clauses (i) through (iii) apply, the sum of the applicable percentages, not to exceed 100 %. Nothing in this Section 10.3 shall be construed to limit the Authority's remedies under Article IX hereof. In addition to the remedy described in this Section 10.3 and any other remedy available to the Authority for failure to meet the goals stated in Section 10.1(c), the Developer agrees and understands that its may not a receive a business subsidy from the Authority or any grantor as defined in the Business Subsidy Act for a period of five years from the date of the failure or until the Developer satisfies its repayment obligation under this Section 10.3, whichever occurs first. Section 10.4. Reports. The Developer must submit to the Authority a written report regarding business subsidy goals and results by no later than March 1 of each year, commencing March 1, 2002 and continuing until the later of (i) the date the goals stated Section 10.1(c) are met; RHB- 192977v2 17 LN140 -75 AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 03/12/01 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 01 -01, approving the proposed business subsidy to Summit Fire Protection VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: This resolution recognizes that Summit Fire Protection meets one or more of the goals and objectives outlined by the EDA in its business subsidy criteria. Those goals include: 1. Light industrial projects in the Apollo Business Center are consistent with the city's comprehensive plan designed to encourage economic growth and diversity. 2. As part of the Lino Lakes Town Center, the projects moving into the park play a significant role in providing a critical mass of development to support retail and service businesses in the commercial center. 3. This project is also consistent with the city's need to recover the return on its investment in the existing infrastructure within the park. This project will be receiving site and building plan review later tonight by the City Council. It is recommended that approval of the business subsidy be contingent upon final approval of the project by the City Council. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -01 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 01 -01 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVING BUSINESS SUBSIDY TO SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority as follows: Section 1. Recitals 1.01. The Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") approved a tax increment financing plan (the "Plan ") for the Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -9 (TIF District No. 1 -9) on December 14, 1998. 1.02. On December 14, 1998, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") approved the Plan. 1.03 On November 8, 1999, following a public hearing, the Authority approved the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority Business Subsidy Criteria (the "Criteria "), pursuant to 40 Minnesota Statute, sections 1167.993 through 116J.995 (the `Business Subsidy Act. ") 1.04. Summit Fire Protection, a Minnesota Corporation, (the 'Developer") has requested a business subsidy through tax increment financing in the amount of $217,059 for the construction of a light industrial facility in the Apollo Business Center. 1.05. Pursuant to Section 1167.994, subd. 5 of the Business Subsidy Act, the Authority has on this date held a public hearing on the proposed subsidy to the Developer, following published notice as required by law, at which hearing all persons wishing to express an opinion were given an opportunity to do so. • Section 2. Findings. 2.01. It is hereby found and determined that the business subsidy is in the best interest of the Authority because it is consistent with and promotes the goals established by the Authority in adopting the Criteria. 2.02. It is hereby found and determined that granting the business subsidy to the Developer furthers the Authority's general plan of economic development of the community by encouraging growth and expansion of an industrial park which has not been used to its full potential. 2.03. Pursuant to the Criteria established by the Authority, it is hereby found and determined that the business subsidy promotes the following: 1. Encourages economic and commercial diversity within the community; • • 2. Contributes to the establishment of a critical mass of commercial development within an area; and 3. Encourages full utilization of existing or planned infrastructure improvements. Section 3. Authorization. 3.01. The business subsidy to the Developer as described above is hereby approved. 3.02. The President and Acting Executive Director are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Development Agreement, including the business subsidy agreement required by the Business Subsidy Act, and other appropriate documents to facilitate the finalization of the business subsidy to the Developer. 3.03. Staff and consultants are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary or convenient to effect the intent of this resolution, including seeking approval of the subsidy from the Lino Lakes City Council. Dated: , 2001. President ATTEST: Executive Director The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: AGENDA ITEM 4 Mary Alice Divine 03/12/01 Consideration of the Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and Summit Fire Protection 3/5 BACKGROUND: This development contract outlines the conditions for public assistance to Summit Fire Protection for the construction of a 30,076- square foot facility on five acres on the G.M. Development property in the Apollo Business Center (see attached map). The proposed facility will have a minimum market value of $1,615,000 for an estimated total of $73,000 in annual taxes. This agreement is based on a total TIF subsidy of $217,059. It removes the assessments of $87,780 upfront. The remaining pay -as- you -go TIF amounts to $129,279 for assistance with land write down and return of escrow. The city will be reimbursed first for the assessments from the available tax increment, and then the developer will receive the remaining increment. Estimated total payback is in 2007. This project is in TIF District 1 -9, which requires a 10% local contribution ($23,496). It is the city's intent to apply the interest lost on the assessments that were deferred until development occurred as the local contribution. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the contract for private development between Lino Lakes EDA and Summit Fire Protection 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 trg41174 A a ou aoo o o; ins 111111111111111 n 1:!41 11112 � Rae 1' ° �w Amax p e�0ul d 0000a��E': �rs �m 00' a RIs 5 On co Ell a a IO Odpl� _ �• I�u.LLfu_'41ty�,��na� i3Lyi:Gi�l � . -..` 111111111: �1 V MOM • • AGENDA ITEM 5 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 03/12/01 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution NO. 01 -02, Declaring Default and Terminating Development Agreement, H &L Mesabi VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: On January 24, 2000 the EDA approved a Contract for Private Development with H &L Mesabi for $110,200. The contract required H &L Mesabi to complete the construction of its facility by December 31, 2000. Since the approval of that agreement, the company, which is based in Hibbing, Minnesota, had some setbacks that changed the outlook for the construction of this metro area facility. Because H &L Mesabi has not begun construction of the building in the Apollo Business Center, the company is in default of its development agreement. The president of the company was sent a notification that he had 30 days to cure the default by providing evidence of his intent to complete the facility. He selected not to cure the default. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution 01 -02, declaring default and terminating the development agreement 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority Resolution No. 01 -02 RESOLUTION DECLARING DEFAULT AND TERMINATING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "Authority ") entered into that certain contract for private development dated April 25, 2000 (the "Development Agreement ") with Bernard V. Carey (the' Developer"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Development Agreement, the Developer agreed to construct a manufacturing facility containing 15,000 square feet (the `Minimum Improvements ") by no later than December 31, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Developer has failed to begin construction of the Minimum Improvements; and WHEREAS, by letter dated February 1, 2001 the Authority notified the Developer of the default under the Development Agreement and provided the 30 day notice and opportunity to cure the default required by Section 9.2 of the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Developer has failed to cure the default. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, as follows: 1. The Developer is declared to be in default under the Development Agreement for failing to begin or complete construction of the Minimum Improvements and has failed to cure said default after notice. 2. The Authority hereby elects to cancel and rescind the Development Agreement. 3. The Authority staff is authorized and directed to take any and all steps necessary to terminate the Authority's relationship with the Developer and to make no payments to and confer no benefits on the Developer pursuant to the Development Agreement. 4. The city council is asked to authorize termination of the Assessment Agreement executed by the Developer and the Authority regarding the Minimum Improvements. Dated: March 12, 2001. • John Bergeson, President RHB- 194197v1 LN140 -69 1 • Attest: • • Linda Waite Smith, Executive Director The motion for the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly adopted. RHB- 194197v1 LN140 -69 2 • EXPENDITURES MARCH 12, 2001 • • Date: 03/02/2001 Time: 09:41:52 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) • Entry Journal #: (R) 1522 1522 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003757 REMEMBER ME FLORAL & GIFTS, INC. 1 45.80 45.80 .00 .00 004350 T.K.D.A. 15 31,170.32 31,170.32 .00 .00 900217 ARNT CONSTRUCTION 1 38,377.33 38,377.33 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 17 69,593.45 69,593.45 .00 .00* Date: 03/02/2001 Time: 09:42:07 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: • Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1523 - 1523 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000223 SPRING LAKE PARK, CITY OF 1 1,001.45 1,001.45 .00 .00 000224 ST. FRANCIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 1,149.09 1,149.09 .00 .00 000329 ROLEK, ALAN 1 275.00 275.00 .00 .00 000403 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF 1 1,468.34 1,468.34 .00 .00 000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #14 1 509.06 509.06 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,038.76 1,038.76 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 36.12 36.12 .00 .00 000605 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES 1 16.23 16.23 .00 .00 000606 INVENSYS METERING SYSTEMS 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000607 VOPAK /VW & R ST. PAUL 1 410.03 410.03 .00 .00 000927 CARLSON, DONNA 1 36.57 36.57 .00 .00 C 3 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 311.04 311.04 .00 .00 001101 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 1,383.97 1,383.97 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 6,098.48 6,098.48 .00 .00 001220 CRAGUN'S CONFERENCE CTR 1 283.40 283.40 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 2,470.25 2,470.25 .00 .00 001350` E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. 1 642.50 642.50 .00 .00 001473 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL HEALTH CARE 2 211.00 211.00 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 635.71 635.71 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 3 128.89 128.89 .00 .00 001680 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 1 92.80 92.80 .00 .00 Date: 03/02/2001 Time: 09:42:08 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Name Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 144.98 144.98 .00 .00 001932 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1 3,981.69 3,981.69 .00 .00 001962 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 001977 I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC. 1 101.35 101.35 .00 .00 002003 INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 1 145.00 145.00 .00 .00 002440 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC. 1 93.74 93.74 .00 .00 002540 MEDICA 1 21,350.03 21,350.03 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 618.90 618.90 .00 .00 003320 NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 1 744.00 744.00 .00 .00 003410 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE CO., INC. 1 167.21 167.21 .00 .00 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 15,394.53 15,394.53 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 2 180.00 180.00 .00 .00 003926 SCHWAAB, INC. 1 33.12 33.12 .00 .00 004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 712.80 712.80 .00 .00 004280 SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC. 1 149.40 149.40 .00 .00 004400 TESCH, DAN 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 AllTIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 1 550.00 550.00 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 9,951.82 9,951.82 .00 .00 004687 VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER 1 1,415.00 1,415.00 .00 .00 900489 TROLLHAUGEN, INC. 1 1,106.00 1,106.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 47 75,658.26 75,658.26 .00 .00* • Date: 03/06/2001 Time 09:45:54 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1540 - 1540 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Options: Vendor # 004350 • • Detail / Summary: S Name CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N T.K.D.A. Grand Totals: Discounts # of items Net Gross Discount Lost i 6 9,178.97 9,178.97 .00 6 9,178.97 9,178.97 .00 .00* Date: 03/06/2001 Time: 09:46:09 Ranges: • Options: Vendor # Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1541 - 1541 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Detail / Summary: S CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 1 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000034 000093 000095 000100 000108 000110 000158 000248 000293 000303 000310 000528 000541 000576 000598 000922 000930 000946 001050 001187 001208 GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF 1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 302.57 302.57 .00 .00 ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. 1 169.34 169.34 .00 .00 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 131.15 131.15 .00 .00 LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS 1 60.25 60.25 .00 .00 A T & T WIRELESS 1 458.38 458.38 .00 .00 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 2 1,682.74 1,682.74 .00 .00 MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 81.22 81.22 .00 .00 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 101.00 101.00 .00 .00 STUDIOWORKS 1 1,615.30 1,615.30 .00 .00 MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTECH GROUP 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00� 1 QWEST 2 1,293.42 1,293.42 .00 .00 ASPEN MILLS 1 121.76 121.76 .00 .00 INTERNATIONAL NARCOTIC ENFORCEMENT 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 3,172.39 3,172.39 .00 .00 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 31.12 31.12 .00 .00 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 15,171.35 15,171.35 .00 .00 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 160.43 160.43 .00 .00 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 2,331.99 2,331.99 .00 .00 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 55.74 55.74 .00 .00 Date: 03/06/2001 Time: 09:46:10 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount V r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 249.60 249.60 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 3 4,632.21 4,632.21 .00 .00 001335 DRESSER TRAP ROCK, INC. 1 3,619.14 3,619.14 .00 .00 001504 U. S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 3 2,098.75 2,098.75 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 175.87 175.87 .00 .00 001570 FRIDLEY, CITY OF 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 001840 HILLESHEIM, TIM 1 28.73 28.73 .00 .00 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 540.00 540.00 .00 .00 002120 KELLY AGENCY, INC. 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 i I 002270 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, INC. 1 962.04 962.04 .00 .0Q 1 002332 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 1 375.00 375.00 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 89.40 89.40 .00 .00 002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 2 1,442.00 1,442.00 .00 .00 002743 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 2,985.96 2,985.96 .00 .00 41, NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 71.34 71.34 .00 .00 003342 NOTT COMPANY, INC. 1 5.75 5.75 .00 .00 003452 PERA /COUNCIL 1 221.92 221.92 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY WORKS 1 232.19 232.19 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 162.00 162.00 .00 .00 003660 RC IDENTIFICATIONS, INC. 1 146.44 146.44 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 243.59 243.59 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 21.30 21.30 .00 .00 i 004059 SMYSER, JEFF 1 46.56 46.56 .00 .011 I 004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 306.20 306.20 .00 .00 004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 95.20 95.20 .00 .00 • Date: 03/06/2001 Time: 09:46:11 ill" # Name CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,327.59 1,327.59 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 317.56 317.56 .00 .0d I 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .Oq 004456 TODORA, GAIL 1 1,080.00 1,080.00 .00 .00 004575 UPS /UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 21.30 21.30 .00 .00 900305 HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. 1 126.00 126.00 .00 .00 900453 L B GRAPHIC DESIGN, INC. 1 996.00 996.00 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 1 120.49 120.49 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 65 50,247.28 50,247.28 .00 .00* • • Date: 03/06/2001 Time: 09:55:35 Operator: JAL Page: CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Ranges: Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: Options: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 61253 61254 61257 61260 61270 0 0 61275 61276 0 61278 0 61282 6 SP FR LAKE 7 ST. . FRANCIS 0 T.K.D.A. 61290 T.K.D.A. 0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS 1530 - 1546 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. AFSCME COUNCIL #14 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF CENTENNIAL LAKES POLIC DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCI KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, MEDICA NORTHWEST ASST PERA /COUNCIL PERA /REGULAR PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN PARK, CITY POLICE DEP CONSULT DOOR GRAPHICS PAYROLL WITHHOLDING SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT DENTAL INSURANCE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING LEGAL SERVICE REPAIR /REFINISH #349 MEDICAL INSURANCE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT CLEARWATER CREEK 3RD HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL Total for Dept ** ATTOR * * * * * * ** 169.34 * * * * * * ** 509.06 * * * * * * ** 1,468.34 * * * * * * ** 1,383.97 * * * * * * ** 1,384.22 * * * * * * ** 3,981.69 * * * * * * ** 540.00 * * * * * * ** 462.04 * * * * * * ** 5,386.67 * * * * * * ** 744.00 * * * * * * ** 221.92 * * * * * * ** 15,394.53 * * * * * * ** 24.00 * * * * * * ** 774.76 * * * * * * ** 1,001.45 * * * * * * ** 1,149.09 * * * * * * ** 1,657.26 * * * * * * ** 4,197.01 * * * * * * ** 353.50 40,802.85* O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE SUPPLIES ADULT IN 10.35 O HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. PIZZA ADULT IN 126.00 Total for Dept 201 136.35* 0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. BRIEFCASE /50 O STAR TRIBUNE, INC. ADVERTISING Total for Dept 61293 TROLLHAUGEN, INC. • ADULT SP 374.84 ADULT SP 95.20 202 470.04* SKI PASSES /EQUIPMENT Total for Dept 205 O ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. BALLS /BAGS /PUCKS /T -SHIRT 0 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS PROGRAM REC Total for Dept 207 SPECIAL 1,106.00 1,106.00* YOUTH IN 425.90 YOUTH IN 60.00 485.90* Date: 03/06/2001 Time 09:55:35 Operator: JAL • Check # Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. BRIEFCASE /50 61256 CARLSON, DONNA MILEAGE 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC FEB 21 61292 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 31 /FEB 5 /FEB 7 61295 VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS Total for Dept 401 0 0 61260 61262 61263 61272 61275 61282 61288 61291 A T & T WIRELESS D.C.A. INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONA FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INTERNATIONAL PERSONNE MEDICA RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN STAR TRIBUNE, INC. TESCH, DAN MONTHLY SERVICE FLEXIBLE SPENDING DENTAL INSURANCE DRUG SCREEN INSURANCE MEMBERSHIP /D TESCH MEDICAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE ADVERTISING MEETING Total for Dept 402 MAYOR /CO 318.50 MAYOR /CO 36.57 MAYOR /CO 200.00 MAYOR /CO 250.00 MAYOR /CO 1,415.00 2,220.07* ADMINIST 28.31 ADMINI ADMINIST 249.60 ADMINIST 88.40 ADMINIST 156.00 ADMINIST 56.49 ADMINIST 145.00 ADMINIST 632.53 ADMINIST 20.00 ADMINIST 342.80 ADMINIST 40.00 1,759.13* 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE 61260 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 406 61260 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING 2 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 84 ROLEK, ALAN REIMBURSE REGISTRATION /A Total for Dept 407 SENIORS 45.01 SENIORS 13.82 SENIORS 3.62 SENIORS 4.00 66.45* FINANCE 55.26 FINANCE 27.90 FINANCE 425.00 FINANCE 72.00 FINANCE 14.00 FINANCE 275.00 869.16* O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR LEGAL CO 14,817.85 Total for Dept 414 14,817.85* O A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE 61260 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 STUDIOWORKS TOWN CENTER MASTER Total for Dept 415 O ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. BRIEFCASE /50 61260 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 SMYSER, JEFF MILEAGE /SEMINAR • ECONOMIC 27.24 ECONOMIC 44.20 ECONOMIC 25.66 ECONOMIC 207.53 ECONOMIC 8.00 PLAN ECONOMIC 1,615.30 1,927.93* PLANNING 196.00 PLANNING 44.20 PLANNING 21.21 PLANNING 207.53 PLANNING 8.00 PLANNING 46.56 Date: 03/06/2001 Time: 09:55:36 Operator: JAL Check # Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Total for Dept 416 61260 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 418 0 0 0 61259 61260 61262 61263 61264 61265 0 61269 0 0 0 0 61275 0 61279 0 61282 61283 1111"8 0 ASPEN MILLS BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE L CONNEXUS ENERGY CRAGUN'S CONFERENCE CT DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONA FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. GALL'S INC. GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLI UNIFORM SUPPLIES REGISTRATION /M DEMARS MONTHLY SERVICE RESERVATIONS /M BROWN DENTAL INSURANCE DRUG SCREEN INSURANCE UNIFORM SUPPLIES CABLE Communit Communit Communit POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF REGISTRATION /R KAULFUSS POLICE I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, BADGES POLICE INTERNATIONAL NARCOTIC DUES /B HAMMES POLICE L B GRAPHIC DESIGN, IN SHIRTS LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, REPAIR /REFINISH #349 LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM SUPPLIES MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTEC JAN USAGE PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING RC IDENTIFICATIONS, IN SUPPLIES RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE REMEMBER ME FLORAL & G FLORAL ARRANGEMENT STAR TRIBUNE, INC. ADVERTISING UPS /UNITED PARCEL SERV PARCEL SERVICE Total for Dept 420 61260 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 421 POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE 61260 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE BUILDING O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE SUPPLIES BUILDING 61271 INTERNATIONAL CONFEREN MANUALS BUILDING 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE BUILDING O MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRAT REGISTRATION /P KLUEGEL BUILDING 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE BUILDING O SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS BUILDING Total for Dept 422 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE • STREETS STREETS Amount 523.50* 22.11 7.18 4.00 33.29* 121.76 40.00 10.65 283.40 351.12 55.00 250.33 128.89 16.23 15.00 101.35 40.00 996.00 500.00 60.25 7,134.63 37.00 90.00 146.44 100.00 45.80 370.00 21.30 10,915.15* 35.91 16.00 913.00 8.00 972.91* 132.60 45.76 7.42 50.00 2,430.49 30.00 12.00 1,327.59 4,035.86* 27.24 496.17 Date: 03/06/2001 Time 09:55:37 Operator: JAL • Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 61260 0 61263 0 61275 61282 0 61296 0 0 61260 61263 0 61274 61275 0 0 0 61282 0 0 0 0 0 111,8 0 0 0 61263 0 0 61275 0 0 0 61282 0 61289 0 Description Dept Amount DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DRESSER TRAP ROCK, INC FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRIDLEY, CITY OF MEDICA DENTAL INSURANCE SAND MIX INSURANCE REG MUT AID ASSOC MEDICAL INSURANCE RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, PARTS VOPAK /VW & R ST. PAUL CALCIUM CHLORIDE XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 430 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, MEDICA MENARDS, INC. NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPM NOTT COMPANY, INC. DIESEL DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE SUPPLIES SPROCKET /CHAIN MEDICAL INSURANCE SCREWS CABINET HOSE KIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE SOLVENT ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, PARTS THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH PARTS /SUPPLIES Total for Dept 431 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF CONNEXUS ENERGY COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, I MEDICA MONTHLY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE BLUELINE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES INSURANCE SUPPLIES INSTALL RELEASE BUTTON MEDICAL INSURANCE METRO SALES INCORPORAT STAPLES PITNEY WORKS POSTAGE METER RENTAL QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI SCANNER CABLE SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMP BALLAST WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Total for Dept 432 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE 61258 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF MONTHLY SERVICE 0 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 61260 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS 88.41 3,619.14 48.68 10.00 622.59 23.40 80.37 410.03 2,985.96 8,411.99* 4,632.21 22.10 9.54 34.11 93.74 425.00 2.12 71.34 5.75 4.60 243.59 225.83 317.56 6,087.49* 302.57 160.43 5,539.89 954.32 55.74 159.90 6.73 15.08 375.00 425.00 1,442.00 232.19 1,178.89 4.00 21.30 149.40 81.22 11,103.66* 64.56 558.59 -19.70 121.59 49.84 Date: 03/06/2001 Time: 09:55:37 Operator: JAL • Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE SUPPLIES PARKS 36.88 61268 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL REIMBURSE UNIFORM ALLOWA PARKS 144.98 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE PARKS 1,487.50 O MENARDS, INC. SANDER /DISC PARKS 87.28 61277 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE CO., GLOVES PARKS 167.21 O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING PARKS 30.00 0 QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS 114.53 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE PARKS 22.00 0 T.K.D.A. MARSHAN /RESHANAU PARKS PARKS 402.36 Total for Dept 450 3,267.62* O A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATI 129.67 O BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE RECREATI 31.12 0 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATI -19.71 61260 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI 26.52 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE RECREATI 28.03 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE SUPPLIES RECREATI 32.87 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE RECREATI 292.53 0 MRPA UMPIRE REGISTRATION RECREATI 35.00 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE RECREATI 12.80 61285 SCHWAAB, INC. STAMP RECREATI 33.12 0 TODORA, GAIL ACTIVITIES GUIDE RECREATI 1,080.00 Total for Dept 451 1,681.95* O ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. BRIEFCASE /50 61292 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 31 /FEB 5 /FEB 7 Total for Dept 452 PARK BOA 171.50 PARK BOA 100.00 271.50* 41/ 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM 27.51 0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. BRIEFCASE /50 ENVIRONM 196.00 63 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE ENVIRONM 5.55 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM 191.25 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ENVIRONM 1.80 61292 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 31 /FEB 5 /FEB 7 ENVIRONM 200.00 Total for Dept 461 622.11* 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE SOLID WA 1.23 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE SOLID WA 42.50 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SOLID WA .40 Total for Dept 462 44.13* 61263 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. INSURANCE FORESTRY 5.56 61275 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FORESTRY 191.25 61282 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FORESTRY 1.80 Total for Dept 463 198.61* O U. S. BANK TRUST NATIO ADMINISTRATIVE FEE IMPRO DEBT SER 2,098.75 Total for Dept 470 2,098.75* 0 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 108.84 • Date: 03/06/2001 Time: 09:55:38 Operator: JAL • Check # 0 61252 M 0 61260 61263 0 61266 61267 0 0 61273 0 61275 0 0 61279 61280 61282 61294 61297 61252 0 61260 61263 61266 61275 0 9 II/P82 61297 61255 61261 0 61290 Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'5 HARDWARE GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN HILLESHEIM, TIM INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INVENSYS METERING SYST KELLY AGENCY, INC. MEDICA MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN QWEST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, XCEL ENERGY MATERIALS UTILITY POSTAGE MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE CONTAINER DEMURRAGE REIMBURSE CLAMP WATER SAMPLES SENSUS SUPPORT BOND MEDICAL INSURANCE WATER METER PARTS ADVERTISING ADVERTISING MONTHLY SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE WATER METER PARTS MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 494 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, MEDICA PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN XCEL ENERGY ARNT CONSTRUCTION E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. UTILITY POSTAGE MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE MEDICAL INSURANCE ADVERTISING ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 495 WATER 131.15 WATER 155.52 WATER 680.09 WATER 19.90 WATER 13.22 WATER 39.16 WATER 46.40 WATER 30.00 WATER 28.73 WATER 101.00 WATER 500.00 WATER 100.00 WATER 167.52 WATER 3,172.39 WATER 18.00 WATER 45.00 WATER 36.12 WATER 7.60 WATER 9,951.82 WATER 430.54 15,783.00* SEWER 155.52 SEWER 190.76 SEWER 19.89 SEWER 13.18 SEWER 46.40 SEWER 167.51 SEWER 18.00 SEWER 45.00 SEWER 7.60 SEWER 188.36 852.22* CONTRACTOR /OTTER LAKE RO OTHER 38,377.33 SURVEY /THE VILLAGE OTHER 642.50 MARSHAN /RESHANAU PARKS OTHER 7,119.35 HIGHWAY 49 IMPACT STUDY OTHER 26,973.31 Total for Dept 499 73,112.49* Grand Total 204,677.96* Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax March 6, 2001 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12567 — 12590, in the amount of $8,466.79 is hereby requested. • • • DATE CHECK# NAME 03/06/2001 12567 03/06/2001 12568 03/06/2001 12569 03/06/2001 12570 03/06/2001 12571 03/06/2001 12572 03/06/2001 12573 03/06/2001 12574 03/06/2001 12575 03/06/2001 1 2576 03/06/2001 12577 03/06/2001 12578 03/06/2001 12579 03/06/2001 12580 03/06/2001 12581 03/06/2001 12582 03/06/2001 12583 03/06/2001 12584 03/06/2001 12585 03/06/2001 12586 03/06/2001 12587 03/06/2001 12588 03/06/2001 12589 03/06/2001 12590 Centennial Fire District Check Register Anoka - Technical College Centennial Utilities Chief Supply Circle Pines Office Products Dan Lallier Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Fire Instructors Association of Minnesota Glen Olson Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator Jeff Amacher Milo Bennett MN Chapter IAAI /Jeffrey G. Schadegg North EMS Education Our Design, Inc. Oxygen Service Company, Inc. Pagenet Press Publications Sunshine Lightning Company Tom Mischke Verizon Wireless Viking Office Products Viking Trophies, Inc. Zep Manufacturing Company Stacy's Specialty Stitching Page 1 of 1 ACCOUNT AMOUNT 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 235.00 42251 - Station 1 Gas 789.37 42130 - Equipment Expense 130.76 42180 - Office Supplies 69.76 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 35.00 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 4,141.70 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 69.48 42180 - Office Supplies 8.51 42230 - Cleaning Supplies 21.78 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 13.00 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 1,474.71 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 280.00 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 119.00 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 109.95 42270 - Breathing Air 118.00 42240 - Telephone Expence 79.18 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 54.00 42110 - Other Maintenance 157.35 42130 - Equipment Expense 4.77 42240 - Telephone Expence 151.19 42180 - Office Supplies 28.81 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 180.69 42230 - Cleaning Supplies 81.78 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 113.00 Total $8,466.79 • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM NO. 1B Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk- Treasurer March 12, 2001 Resolution No. 01 -34 Considering 3.2 Beer Permit, for St. Joseph Church VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: Darlene at St. Joseph church has applied for a 3.2 beer permit for a Fish Dinner event. The event is scheduled to take place at St. Joseph church on Thursday, March 30, 2001 from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. This event requires a 3.2 beer permit, a certificate of insurance and $35.00. The City is in receipt of the certificate of insurance and fee. Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 2001 -34 approving the application for the 3.2 permit. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 01 -34 2. Deny Resolution No. 01 -34 3. Return to Staff with Direction RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-34 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR 3.2 PERMIT AT SAINT JOSEPH'S PARISH WHEREAS, the Parish of Saint Joseph's Catholic Church has made application to the City of Lino Lakes to acquire a 3.2 beer permit, and WHEREAS, the Parish of Saint Joseph's Catholic Church scheduled a Fish Dinner event on March 30, 2001, between 6:30 p.m. — 12:00 a.m., and WHEREAS, the noted event is proposed to be held at 171 Elm Street, Lino Lakes, and WHEREAS, Saint Joseph's Catholic Church has submitted a Certificate of Insurance for the dates of the event, and WHEREAS, Saint Joseph's Catholic Church is subject to all the provisions and conditions of the laws of the City of Lino Lakes, the State and of the Federal Government pertaining to such sales, and is revocable for the violation therefore; not transferable. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes hereby grants authorization to Saint Joseph's Catholic Church to obtain a 3.2 beer permit under the noted conditions at the above - mentioned location and dates. NOW, THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Lino Lakes hereby does grant permission to sell 3.2 beer on Friday, March 30, 2001 at Saint Joseph's Parish, 171 Elm Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of March 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor • ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • Form No. 2841 -Stet. form 109 Election Systems end Software 1.800.800 -8225 STATE OF MINNESOTA Combination Application for Retailer's (On -Sale) (Off -Sale) 3.2 Beer T City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (Name of licensing authority (county) (city) Cou y of Anoka 1, St. Joseph Parish of the city, or town of Lino Lakes county of Anoka State of Minnesota, hereby make application for a Retailer's (On -Sale) (Off-Sale) 3.2 Beer License to sell such 31 Beer under and to an ordinance (resolution) by city council, county board of, ; and pursuant passed Chapter 340, Minnesota Statutes 1945, as amended, providing for licensing and regulating the sale of 32 Beer. During the past five years, my residence has been as follows: 1 was born a. ,_ a, 1 am a (native) (naturalized) citizen of the United States. 1 am married. My (wife's) (husband's) name and address is 1 am proprietor. Firm was incorporated 1891 in the state of Minnesota Corporation is authorized to do business in Minnesota. License is for 171 Elm Street (street) (highway) located as follows: Lino Lakes, MN 55014 The license will be in connection with Fish Dinner and Dance „n q,« 4 3 o y,a G , which has been in operation 1_09 years The establishment is located on the 1st floor. The business premises are owned by The Church of St. Joseph of Rice Lake, Lino Lakes, MN The taxes on the property are not delinquent. 1 am engaged In the retail sale of intoxicating liquor. 1 have • had an application for license rejected as follows: ave neuer been convicted of a felony nor of violating any National or state liquor law or local ordinance relating to the Lure, sale or transportation, or possession for sale or transportation of intoxicating liquor. mbling or gambling devices will not be permitted on the licensed premises. 1 am the owner of the leasehold, furniture, fixtures, and equipment in the premises for which the license Is applied, except 1 have no intention or agreement to transfer the license to another person. !submit the following names of persons, including a bank, for reference, with whom 1 have had business relations as follows: 1 intend to engage in the sale of intoxicating liquor and will have a Federal Occupational Tax Receipt in accordance with the ordinance governing this license. My Federal Tax Stamp Receipt Is No 1 will comply strictly with the provisions of the ordinance relating to the sale of soft drinks for "mixing" purposes and will serve patrons in full view of the public. 1 agree to waive my Constitutional Rights against search and seizure and will freely permit peace officers to inspect my premises and agree to the forfeiture of my license tf found to have violated the provisions of the ordinance (resolution) providing for the granting of this license. 1 hereby solemnly swear that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that 1 agree to comply with all the provisions of the ordinance under which this license is granted. Subscribed and sworn to before me this a .3 Oi+ A,• i '1 • f < s rn. i. day of 'UC Year 3 Applicant' Signature N,C- f')S-N• USA M. HOGSTAD NOTARY FUBLIC.M NNESJTA IA/Comm, Ex as J.r 31 :005 Note: Licenses may be issued only to persons who are citizens of th`e nrted tafe aridi4?SiYtlle'C(lfdtitt'i oral character and repute, who have attained the age of 21 years and who are proprietors of the establishment for which the licenses are Issued. Laws 1949, c. 700. • AGENDA ITEM 1C STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE 3/12/01 TOPIC Resolution No. 2001 -35 Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from Area and Unit Fund to the Water Operating Fund VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND Each year a transfer is budgeted from the Area and Unit Fund to the Water Operating Fund to pay principal and interest on the 1996B G.O. Water Revenue Bonds. This transfer is a part of the funding mechanism set up in the original bond documents. This transfer may not be necessary if the Water Fund has sufficient revenue to cover these payments. However, without this transfer being made in 2000 the Water Fund will be in deficit for the year. The amount of the transfer would be $301,709. It is staff's recommendation that Council authorize this transfer effective December 31, 2000. OPTIONS • 1. Adopt Resolution 2001 -35 transferring funds from the Area and Unit fund to the Water Operating Fund. 2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration. 3. Deny Resolution 2001 -35. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • Council member introduced the following resolution and move its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -35 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE AREA AND UNIT FUND TO THE WATER OPERATING FUND FOR PAYMENT OF 1996B G.O. WATER REVENUE BOND WHEREAS, a transfer was budgeted in 2000 to the Water Operating Fund from the Area and Unit Fund to cover principal and interest on the 1996B G.O. Water Revenue Bonds due in 2000, and WHEREAS, it is staff's recommendation that this transfer be completed effective December 31, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, that the following transfer be authorized and recorded effective December 31, 2000: Increase Decrease Water Operating Fund (601) $301,709 Area and Unit Fund (406) ($301,709) Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 12th day of March, 2001. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: • • AGENDA ITEM 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek C�.4 MEETING DATE 3/12/01 TOPIC Resolution 2001 -44 Authorizing the Closing of 1994 and 1995 Construction Capital Projects Funds VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND The City established the 1994 Construction Fund ( Fund 454) to account for the activity of the Country Lakes Estates, Highway 49 and Lake Drive and Hodgson Road Watermain projects. Due to construction overruns and an eminent domain settlement for the George Reiling property this fund has a current fund deficit of $440,942. The 1995 Construction Fund (Fund 455) was established to account for the activity of the Woods of Baldwin Lakes II project. This fund has a fund balance of $9,024. All of the projects associated with these funds have been completed and the contracts have been closed out. No further activity is anticipated in these funds. It is standard practice to close inactive funds at the end of an accounting period (ie. 12/31/2000). In accordance with generally accepted accounting principals the funds are to be closed to the corresponding debt service fund or the fund from which the funding for the project originated. In the case of both of these funds, the Area and Unit Fund is the appropriate fund into which these construction funds should be closed. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that the City Council adopt Resolution 2001 -444 authorizing the closing of these funds and the residual equity transfers resulting from the closures. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 2001 -44 Authorizing the Closing Of Capital Projects Funds 2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration. 3. Deny Resolution 2001 -44. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • Council member introduced the following resolution and move its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -44 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLOSING OF 1994 AND 1995 CONSTRUCTION CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS WHEREAS, WHEREAS, the 1994 Construction Fund (Fund 454) and the 1995 Construction Fund (Fund 455) were established to account for projects undertaken by the City of Lino Lakes, and the projects associated with the 1994 Construction Fund (Fund 454) and the 1995 Construction Fund (Fund 455) have been completed and contracts have been closed and said funds are inactive, and WHEREAS, it is standard accounting practice to close inactive funds at the end of an accounting period, and WHEREAS, such funds are closed either to an associated debt service fund or to the fund from which the funding for the related projects originated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, that staff is hereby authorized to close the following funds and to make residual fund transfers to the associated funds effective December 31, 2000 as follows: Funds to be Closed 1994 Construction Fund (Fund 454) to 1995 Construction Fund (Fund 455) to Funds Receiving Residual transfers Area and Unit Fund (Fund 406) Area and Unit Fund (Fund 406) Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 12th day of March, 2001. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM 3B STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE March 12, 2001 TOPIC Consideration of adopting Resolution adopting the 2001 Recreation Fund Operating Budgets VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Simple Majority The City Council reviewed the proposed 2001 Recreation Fund Operating Budgets at their Budget work session held August 31, 2000. The budget being presented for approval has not changed since the work session. The Recreation Fund is a special revenue fund and operates from revenues collected from recreation fees. No part of the tax levy is used to finance Recreation Fund operations. The budget for 2001 estimates that a small surplus of $8,780 will be realized in this fund. It has been the practice of the City Council to adopt the Recreation Fund Operating budgets by resolution. Staff recommendation is to adopt Resolution 2001 -33 adopting the final 2001 Recreation Fund Operating Budget. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 2001 -33 adopting the final 2001 Recreation Fund Operating Budgets. 2. Return to staff for further review. 3. Deny Resolution 2001 -33. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. • • • Council member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -33 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2001 RECREATION FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, the Recreation Fund is a Special Revenue Fund, and WHEREAS, all Special Revenue Funds are required to adopt a budget for the forthcoming year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES that the following Recreation Fund Operating Budget for the year 2001 is hereby adopted: 2001 RECREATION FUND BUDGET REVENUES EXPENDITURES Adult Instructional $ 10,000 $ 8,150 Adult Leagues 54,620 47,155 Youth Instructional 95,765 96,580 Youth Leagues 36,500 34,370 Special Events 2,600 4,450 Program Totals $199,485 $190,705 Operating Surplus 0 8,780 Recreation Fund Totals $199,485 $199,485 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, this 12th day of March, 2001. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. A -5 • • AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR DAVID PECCHIA, PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR /CHIEF OF POLICE DATE MARCH 12, 2001 TOPIC CONSIDERATION OF 2000 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ANNUAL REPORT VOTES REQUIRED: SIMPLE MAJORITY BACKGROUND The Department of Public Safety would like to present their annual report to the City Council and community at the City Council meeting on March 12, 2001. The report would include both police and building inspections. OPTIONS 1. Accept the Department of Public Safety 2000 Annual report as presented. 2. Return to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director • COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 12, 2001 TOPIC: Consideration of Easement Agreement with Qwest Wireless, LLC VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: In December, 2000 Qwest Wireless LLC submitted a request for the City to rezone City Hall Park to Public Semi - Public (PSP). This was approved at the February 28, 2001 City Council meeting. The City has received a formal application from Qwest Wireless LLC to construct a 135 foot high tower for antennae for wireless telephone service at City Hall Park. The Federal Communications Act of 1996 requires that the City regulations, "shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." Gary Lysiak, the city's consulting engineer, presented his analysis at the February 28, 2001 City Council meeting indicating that the proposed monopole at City Hall Park is necessary for Qwest Wireless LLC to provide adequate service to its customers. The Easement Agreement indicates that Qwest Wireless LLC will construct and maintain the 135 foot tower. The tower will be designed and constructed in such a manner to support two additional colocators. Upon completion, the tower will become the City of Lino Lakes' property. In exchange for ownership of the tower, the City will grant Qwest Wireless LLC an easement to access the tower and related equipment. Rent will not be charged. Since the City will maintain ownership, rent can be charged to other wireless telephone companies who wish to colocate on the tower. Annual rents for colocating on similar towers are currently around $16,000. Gary Lysiak, our Consulting Engineer and the City Attorney have reviewed the proposed Easement Agreement. Access to the tower and equipment will be via the Public Works parking lot. Exhibit B, "Description of the Easement Tract and Access Route," will be legally described and included in the Easement Agreement. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Easement Agreement with Qwest Wireless, LLC 2. Do not approve Easement Agreement 3. Return to staff for further review. • RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 3/7/01 RD /Util /monopole /greensheet Qwest • • • SITE # MIN353 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement ") is made this day of , 200 (the "Effective Date ") by The City of Lino Lakes _, whose address is 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 _, ( "Grantor ") for the benefit of Qwest Wireless, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, whose address is 1860 Lincoln St., Fourteenth Floor, Denver, Colorado, 80295, and to its affiliates, parent corporations, subsidiaries, successors, assigns, licensees and agents ( "Qwest "). RECITALS A. Grantor is the fee owner of certain real property located in the City of Lino Lakes , Anoka County, State of Minnesota, as more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Total Property "). B. Qwest has requested, and Grantor has agreed to grant and convey to Qwest, an easement over, across, under and through a portion of the Total Property more particularly described on Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Easement Tract "), together with access thereto, for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, or removal of telecommunications equipment, including, without limitation, poles, towers, cables, antennas, wires, switching equipment, and other telecommunications equipment of any nature, including any necessary appurtenances and . electric and telephone utility service. WITNESSETH: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten and no /100 Dollars ($10.00) and the mutual promises hereinafter set forth, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Grant of Easement. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to Qwest an easement over, across, under, and through the Easement Tract, together with a non - exclusive easement and right of way over, across, under, and through those portions of the Total Property as are reasonably necessary for Qwest to access the Easement Tract (the "Access Route "), for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction, replacement, or removal of telecommunications equipment, including, without limitation, poles, towers, cables, antennas, wires, switching equipment, and other telecommunications equipment of any nature, including any necessary appurtenances and SITE # EASEMENT REVISED 8/9/00 1 • • electric and telephone utility service (collectively, the "Easement "). The Access Route is shown on Exhibit B attached hereto. 2. Construction of Tower. Qwest shall construct a one - hundred and thirty -five (135) foot tower upon the Site. The tower shall be designed and constructed in such a manner as to support Qwest's proposed use and two additional colocators. Upon completion, the tower will become Grantor's Property. Qwest shall, at its sole expense as for additional consideration for this easement, perform all necessary maintenance, repairs and replacements on the tower. Qwest shall also maintain and operate Easement Tract in accordance will all applicable FCC rules and regulations, and cause all other lessees and users of Easement Tract to do the same. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Qwest reserves the right to provide its costs for said maintenance with any colocators. 3. Colocation on Tower. Grantor shall have the right to lease space on the tower to other communications users so long as Grantor complies with the provisions of the Site Easement Agreement. Qwest shall have no right to any of the income received by Owner from any additional leases. 4. Removal of Vegetation. Qwest has the right to cut, remove, dispose of and clear and keep cleared all trees, shrubs and other vegetation and obstructions on the Easement Tract that interferes with the operation of Qwest's equipment. 5. Measurable Interference. Grantor acknowledges that Qwest's use of the Easement Tract for its operation of telecommunications equipment requires no measurable electronic interference ( "Measurable Interference ") by third parties in the vicinity. Accordingly, Grantor will not construct or install nor permit the construction or installation by third parties of improvements or equipment on the Total Property or other land owned by Grantor located in the vicinity of the Easement Tract that interferes with the operation of Qwest's equipment. If Qwest discovers a Measurable Interference that affects the Easement granted herein, Qwest will give written notice to Grantor and Grantor will use its best efforts to cure the Measurable Interference. 6. Maintenance of Access Route. Grantee shall, at its sole cost and expense, reasonably maintain the Access Route in good condition and repair, including but not limited to paving, resurfacing, striping, snow removal, repair and maintenance of drainage from the Access Route, and the costs of any permits required by state, federal, or local laws or regulations to use and maintain the Access Route. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Qwest maintains the right to pro -rate maintenance costs of the access route with additional tower colocators. 7. Grantor's Indemnity. Grantor shall indemnify, defend, and hold Qwest harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, costs or expenses arising out of or related to (i) the use of the Easement Tract and/or the Total Property by Grantor, its agents, SITE # EASEMENT REVISED 8/9/00 2 • • • employees, contractors, licensees, and invitees; (ii) Grantor's interference with Qwest's use and enjoyment of the Easement Tract and/or the Access Route; (iii) the maintenance or repair of the Access Route; (iv) any negligent or willful act or omission of Grantor; or (v) the failure of Grantor to comply with the terms of this Agreement. 8. Limitation on Liability. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this agreement, neither Grantor nor Qwest shall be liable to any person or entity for indirect, consequential or punitive damages for any matter arising hereunder. 9. Grantor's Retained Rights. Grantor reserves the right of ownership, use, and occupancy of the Easement Tract insofar as said ownership, use, and occupancy does not impair the rights granted to Qwest in this Agreement. However, Grantor shall not use or occupy the Easement Tract, the Access Route or the Total Property in any manner that impairs the rights granted to Qwest in this Agreement. Without limiting the foregoing, it is understood and agreed by Grantor that no building, structure, or other improvements of any kind may be placed by Grantor on the Easement Tract or the Access Route; provided, however, that Grantor may install asphalt paving and curbing, cement surface sidewalks and curbs, sod, and other landscaping on the Easement Tract or the Access Route (the "Improvements "), so long as the same do not interfere with Qwest's use of the Easement Tract or the Access Route. Any such Improvements on the Easement Tract or the Access Route shall not be installed until Grantor has obtained Grantee's prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 10. Ownership. Grantor warrants that it is the fee simple owner of the Easement Tract and that it has the right to grant the Easement herein and will warrant and defend title to the property against all claims. 11. Binding Effect. The rights, obligations, conditions and provisions of this Agreement will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. The Easement will run with the land as to all property benefited or burdened, including any division or partition of such property. 12. Assignment. Qwest may assign, apportion, sell, convey or otherwise transfer all or any part of this Agreement and the Easement granted herein to any Affiliate (as defined below), without Grantor's approval. As used herein, "Affiliate" means any corporation or entity which controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, Qwest, or any corporation or entity which results from a merger or consolidation with Qwest or with any entity that controls Qwest. No transfer or assignment of stock of Qwest, or any controlling interest in Qwest, whether by sale, merger, exchange or other means, shall constitute an assignment of this Agreement. 13. Dispute. Any claim, controversy or dispute between the parties will be resolved by binding arbitration in accordance with the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. Sections SITE # EASEMENT REVISED 8/9/00 3 • • • 1 -16, not state law. The arbitration will be conducted by a retired judge or practicing attorney under the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The arbitrator's decision will be final and may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. Each party is responsible for its own costs. The arbitration will be conducted in the county where the Easement Tract is located. 14. FCC Rules. Grantor acknowledges that Qwest, as a licensee under the rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, is subject to certain federal requirements. Grantor will cooperate in good faith with Qwest in its efforts to comply with applicable federal requirements. 15. Relinquishment. In the event that Qwest, in its sole discretion, determines that Qwest no longer needs the Easement, Qwest may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Grantor in recordable form. Upon termination of this Agreement, the parties will be released from all duties, obligations, liabilities and responsibilities under this Agreement, except for those obligations, which by their terms, survive the termination of this Agreement. 16. Removal Upon Grantor Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement, Qwest shall, at its sole expense and upon written request from Grantor given within ten (10) days after the termination of this Agreement, remove all of Qwest's telecommunications equipment and restore the Easement Tract to substantially its original condition, reasonable wear and tear expected. If this easement is terminated before twenty (20) years from the date of this agreement, Grantor shall pay to Qwest the unamortized (based on a straight -line amortization over twenty (20) years) costs incurred by Qwest in constructing the tower. 17. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced according to the laws of the state of Minnesota. 18. Environmental. Grantor warrants and represents that, to its actual knowledge, neither the Total Property nor the Easement Tract contains any Hazardous Materials in any quantity that violates environmental law. Grantor will not use or conduct operations on or at the Easement Tract or the Total Property, or manufacture, store, sell, use, dispose of, release, or discharge Hazardous Materials on or at the Easement Tract or the Total Property, in any manner which violates environmental law or which causes there to be any liability under environmental law. Grantor will indemnify and hold Qwest harmless from and against any and all liability, claims, suits, actions, proceedings, damages, costs, and expenses, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees and costs, imposed upon or incurred by Qwest arising out of or in connection with a misrepresentation by Grantor of Grantor's representation set forth in this section, or a breach of the provisions of this section. "Hazardous Materials" means asbestos or any hazardous substance, waste or materials defined in any federal, state or local environmental or safety law or regulation including, but not limited to, CERCLA. Qwest will be solely responsible for and will SITE # EASEMENT REVISED 8/9/00 4 • • • defend, indemnify and hold Grantor, its agents and employees harmless from and against any and all direct claims, costs and liabilities, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of or in connection with the cleanup or restoration of the Easement Tract or the Total Property associated with Qwest's use of Hazardous Materials on, at or under the Easement Tract or the Total Property. The obligations of this Section will survive the termination of this Agreement. 19. Condemnation. In the event of any exercise of eminent domain or condemnation with respect to the Easement Tract or the access route thereto, Grantor shall be entitled to receive the total award paid or payable as a result of such taking attributable to the value of the portion of the Easement Tract or the Total Property so taken. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Qwest shall be entitled to any separate award paid or payable to Qwest that is attributable to the value of the Easement, the value of the unexpired term of this Agreement, and moving expenses incurred as a result of such taking. 20. Memorandum of Easement. Qwest may record either this Easement or a Memorandum of this Easement in the real property records in the county in which Landlord's Property is located. Each party shall reasonably cooperate with the other party to implement this provision. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above set forth. GRANTOR: STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 2001, by acknowledged to me that they executed the same as their act and deed as Grantor. SITE # EASEMENT REVISED 8/9/00 of , who Notary Public 5 • • • DRAFTED BY: Qwest Wireless, L.L.C. 426 North Fairview Avenue Suite 101 St. Paul, MN 55104 SITE # EASEMENT REVISED 8/9/00 My commission expires: 6 RECORD AND RETURN TO: Qwest Wireless, L.L.C. 426 North Fairview Avenue Suite 101 St. Paul, MN 55104 • • • Exhibit A Legal Description of the Total Property Legal Description: PID (Property Identification Number): 43- 12 -2 -44 -0004 Also known as: 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, MN SITE # EASEMENT REVISED 8/9/00 7 • Exhibit B Description of the Easement Tract & Access Route • • (See Attached) SITE # EASEMENT REVISED 8/9/00 8 AGENDA ITEM 7A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 03/12/01 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution NO. 2001 -39, Terminating Assessment Agreement, H &L Mesabi VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: On January 24, 2000 the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority entered into a Contract for Private Development with H &L Mesabi. The contract required H &L Mesabi to complete the construction of its facility by December 31, 2000. The facility has not been constructed and the EDA earlier tonight considered declaring default and terminating the agreement. An assessment agreement was also entered into by the EDA on behalf of the city calling for a minimum market value of $690,800 with regard to the minimum improvements as of January 2, 2001, for taxes payable beginning in 2002. With • no construction on the site, this market value does not apply and the assessment agreement can be terminated. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution 2001 -39, terminating the assessment agreement 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: City of Lino Lakes Resolution No. 2001 -39 RESOLUTION TERMINATING ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "Authority ") entered into a Contract for Private Development dated April 25 , 2000 (the "Development Agreement ") with Bernard V. Carey (the "Developer ") for construction of a 15,000 square foot manufacturing facility (the "Minimum Improvements ") to be completed by December 31, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Authority and Developer also entered into an Assessment Agreement calling for a minimum market value of $690,800 with regard to the Minimum Improvements as of January 2, 2001 for taxes payable beginning in 2002; and WHEREAS, the Developer has defaulted under the Development Agreement by failing to construct the Minimum Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Authority has terminated the Development Agreement as a result of the Developer's default and wishes to terminate the Assessment Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the city council of the city of Lino Lakes that the Assessment Agreement entered into by the Authority and the Developer and recorded on the 8th day of June , 2000 as document number 1505096 in Anoka County, Minnesota, is hereby terminated. Dated: March 12, 2001. John Bergeson, Mayor Attest: Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator The motion for the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof RHB- 194199v1 LN140 -69 1 • • • and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly adopted. RHB- 194199v1 LN140 -69 2 • • AGENDA ITEM 7 B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: March 12, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -36: Rescinding Approvals of Site & Building Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit H & L Mesabi VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND In February 2000, the City Council approved a site plan and conditional use permit for H & L Mesabi. Unfortunately, the project did not come together for the company. The assessment agreement is scheduled to be cancelled as a different item on tonight's agenda. Staff recommends passing a formal resolution revoking the approvals of the site plan and the CUP. While not strictly necessary, it formally recognizes that the project is not going to be constructed and formalizes the rescinding of the approvals. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -36. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 01 -36 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-36 RESOLUTION RESCINDING THE SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR H & L MESABI, 325 APOLLO DRIVE WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council approved a site and building plan for H & L Mesabi on February 14, 2000, and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council also approved on the same date a conditional use permit for H & L Mesabi to allow outdoor storage, and WHEREAS, the site plan and conditional use permit were approved for the following property: (see attached legal description) • WHEREAS, Section 2, Subdivision 5.E.2. of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance states Activities authorized by site and building plan approval shall be initiated within six (6) months. If such activity is not completed within eighteen (18) months, the site approval shall no longer be in effect, and application and approval of site and building plans shall be required and, WHEREAS, no activity has been initiated on the site within six months of approval and authorized activity will not be completed within eighteen months of approval, and WHEREAS, Section 2, Subdivision 2.B.11. of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance states If construction has not begun within one (1) year after the date of the conditional use permit, or if substantial construction has not taken place within three (3) years after the date of issuance of the conditional use permit, the permit is void. A conditional use specified in the permit expires if, for any reason, the authorized use ceases for more than one year. and, WHEREAS, construction has not begun within one year after the date of the conditional use 111 permit approval and no activity is expected, and WHEREAS, Resolution 01 -39 terminates the assessment agreement between the City and H & L Mesabi, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the site and building plan approved February 14, 2000 for H & L Mesabi is hereby declared no longer be in effect in accordance with the zoning ordinance, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the conditional use permit approved February 14, 2000 for outdoor storage is hereby declared void in accordance with the zoning ordinance. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. 6/ Z16 :31V40 1■144/ Aatv#4:Figoidogi y 3 • • • : 6 - a) Q s t +; • ▪ 3 : . o L• N .CW : C ) "v'°E6 . °t ' a 0 . to y: a {y .0 O r� . N '''s . m .�: 4r .0p 1 M.0'C •COZ" C. '0 _• . 0' " -- ,.,- 0— L 61m , (4 o: ::C —o•• Au m..) a)•m.m`t -• gip,, mCL7 0I". . 014) . p A . :� JCL :r :...oz . .> . -•. • .fi; � +, �:, 0 � ✓ !- 4.• — �,';.f_ y 4)0 0 , a 0 C -5. „° s- O VNm> .� o oiM .. y- C CO 0 m m 0 V CO r- C.. p+L+ 111.- 0 O O y N 0LJ- c 0 C71 • . a'�.. Ca•• , 01)•_•:i p ,".Cn� z..U> . C V 0..V%.f. 0'00 -0- .• '00 wN� H. +. L M tL : +• O 0 ..c o• ,w' 0 ox Q a o.- — J �, , 0 : • a 0• a'' N ' Q;. O•-- Cn d41, O.0 , = a. • V -6.— 41- E 0 in N •C) - L. c .0.c LO OZ (0 A. ++._ �;...c •C co N 55 p,p pLm.Q. .00 C. -� ':O : V 0, 0 , 2 m' � " a. ..z 4 m . Z. Si) a� 0 ,0 pster. ' OO� Z.; N V L. O �. it , .+'.Q •0...- •, 0 T� N ' H p _ > .:O. -0 .:. - '.Qm vy s. ' N r Q4., �{v 0 C3 p .0 : m a p' a 0 — C7 a)'Q :r" C CM .N t ap�.:� aivDy'O 0o C4� p._.. H a, 011 t. j Ni 1 I .c E'-'. 3 0) m y. 3 H A • _- .0 ..7 t. O C,52E 2 O CJN.0.LL tD +> 6 30. a Z- 0.: C) z.- f_. • • U r0 O. y L..0 w. +.% - • L. '0 r- L I �c "O y ' 0 ay. CL1 CD O. 04) 4)0000i- a� O .D C• C0 <. O..O 0.0 0• C- 0 C c. W •• - z . a CnN 5 y xCT -. C m.wlaJ _ +• ^ , 4. a- x ca C. 0 C 'rt. ' C 0 Z O '(• n 0 v0 07 ([� W C L •.)' O.•-) • y 4' . . • . 0) C W y.. `. C • v. 447.-._, 7. 13 f_ Ci 3 f_ .... O m w p W O • y= E.Eor -.moo': EE i f >, ' 0)`'r •e4'4 -, 0 04'to ., 0 00. -:c-'1 E p a vi.. c ti3 c: «, U c.• °►�- U 0.),...,.. !(ii cz. ;' ° ter'.' :' - (- 3.,o .: i• 0 a c U.�• -. (ri O -.c..c c 9. 0 o ' ..' • =. m o 0 : :: Q .0 p a „ q -: o 0 . c » ' a� o) :. Q - > I i C = y o o Vfl• ; 9 a3 3v L _ N� ma. : 4, m _ .. a i c m ''� ft 3ca_ 05 0 oy),c. ooa.00»- 0 •• '• .G _.t .0 O "Ci y O y : C O 0 ; ,.r a) =O n .-' p .. O n y a C O 0 Q ." C • y p f .00 sW.a 2 .m.0f? W.... �, .. ' W p• ` 0 i AGENDA ITEM 7C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 03/12/01 TOPIC: Consideration of Business Subsidy Agreement for Summit Fire Protection Vote Required: 3/5 BACKGROUND: Earlier this evening the Economic Development Authority held a public hearing regarding a proposed $217,059 business subsidy in the form of Tax Increment Financing to Summit Fire Protection for the construction of a 30,000 square foot facility in the Apollo Business Center. State statute requires that a public entity — in this case the EDA —must find that the granting of a subsidy meets the best interests of the city, and a business subsidy agreement needs to be approved by both the EDA and the city council. • This subsidy is to be used to write down a portion of the cost of land and assessments on the project according to the terms of a development agreement. The subsidy agreement specifies the commitment the company is making regarding wages and jobs, plus the annual reporting that is required. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the business subsidy for Summit Fire Protection 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 AGENDA ITEM 7 D and 7 E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jason Lindahl /Alan Brixius (NAC) CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 12, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution 01 -37 for Minor Subdivision and Resolution 01 -38 for Site & Building Plan Review Ryan Companies for Summit Fire Protection 2xx Apollo Road BACKGROUND The applicant, Ryan Companies on behalf of Summit Fire Protection, is requesting minor subdivision and site plan approval to allow the construction of a 30,076 square foot office /warehouse facility on the property located in the 200 block of Apollo Road. The site plan also illustrates a 22,800 square foot future expansion and parking for this expansion. Should the applicant wish to construct this expansion in the future, they will need to receive separate approvals. Summit Fire Protection was started in 1999. According to the company's biographic information, they design, manufacture, install, and service fire suppression systems. The company has approximately 80 employees with facilities in Savage, Roseville, Rochester, and Fargo, N.D. This facility will consolidate their Savage and Roseville operations. This review is based on the following plan submittals: Site Plan dated 1 -12 -2001 Utility Plan received by the City on 3 -2 -2001 Grading Plan received by the City on 3 -2 -2001 Preliminary Landscape Plan dated 1 -11 -2001 Proposed Floor Plan dated 12 -2001 Proposed Building Elevations dated 1 -12 -2001 Sketch and Description Plan dated 1 -12 -2001 Photometric Plan dated 2 -13 -2001 Summit Fire Protection Page 2 of 5 ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning: The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the subject property for Industrial Use. The site's L -I, Light Industrial zoning classification is consistent with this land use designation. The chart below illustrates the surrounding existing and proposed land uses. Land Use and Zoning Data Location Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Zoning Site Undeveloped Industrial L -I, Light Industrial North Undeveloped Industrial L -I, Light Industrial South Apollo Dr. and I -35 Apollo Dr. and 1 -35 L -I, Light Industrial East Industrial Industrial L -I, Light Industrial West Low & Med. Density Residential Low & Med. Density Residential R, R -1, and R -3PDO Lot Size and Setbacks: The lot and building performance standards for properties in the L -I, Light Industrial District are outlined in the chart below. The proposed lot, parking and building meet all of these standards Lot and Building Performance Standards Item Required Proposed Lot size minimum 1 Acre 4.92 Acres Lot width minimum 100 Feet 315 Feet Setbacks: buildings from street rear lot line side lot line residential parking from street rear lot line side lot line 50 Feet 15 Feet 10 Feet 75 Feet 15 feet 5 feet 5 Feet 135 Feet 39 Feet 41 Feet 240 Feet 39 Feet 5 Feet 53 Feet Bldg. height 45 Feet 16 to 28 Feet Green space 10% 62.3 Building: The applicant is proposing to construct a 30,076 square foot office/ warehouse facility. The building is considered one story; however, the office and warehouse portions will have different heights. The office section will be 16 feet high while the warehouse portion will be 28 high. Both of these heights conform to the 45- foot height limit for buildings in the L -I District. The site plan also shows a 22,800 square foot future expansion along with future parking, which will be subject to further review in the future. The buildings exterior materials conform to the standards in Section 3, Subdivision 4.B of the City Code. The warehouse portion of the building will be constructed of pre -cast concrete panels with a painted band. The office portion of the building will be constructed of a mix of pre -cast concrete panels, rockface masonry veneer, and aluminum • • Summit Fire Protection Page 3 of 5 framed glass windows. The office section will also have pre- finished metal canopies over all entrances. Trash Enclosure: The applicant's plans indicate that all trash and recycling containers will be stored inside the principal structure. Lighting: The applicant's photometric plan is consistent with the lighting standards outlined in the City Code. In addition, the site plan shows shoebox light fixtures both on the building and in the parking area. Staff recommends that a condition of approval require that, prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant submit a detailed light fixture plan demonstrating that all exterior lighting will be shoebox type. Signage: Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and separate permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. Landscaping: The applicant's landscape plan presents a varying mix of coniferous and deciduous plants, trees, and shrubs. Most notably, the applicant's plan calls for a native mixture of prairie grasses and wild flowers throughout the site. Typical turf grass will only be used along the front of the building. The prairie mix can grow as high a five feet and will have a very natural appearance. The applicant must submit a maintenance plan for the native prairie grasses. During the February 13 Planning and Zoning Board meeting, the Board had some questions about the need for periodic burning of the native prairie grasses. The Board requested comments regarding this issue from the City's Fire Chief. According to a memo from the Chief dated February 15, 2001, he is very concerned about burning the prairie grass (see attached memo). The Board also directed the Environmental Specialist and the Environmental Board to research whether there are other types of prairie grass that do not require burning. This issue was discussed at the February 28 Environmental Board meeting (see report dated February 28, 2001). Staff recommends that a condition of approval require staff and the applicant to agree on any necessary changes to the landscape plan prior to issuance of a building permit. In general, the other trees and shrubs shown on the landscape plan should provide an effective screening of the front of the building and loading areas. However, the applicant should add screening along the western side of the site to screen the loading areas from the adjacent residential use. In addition, should the applicant decide to construct the future parking stalls along the western side of the site, they will need to add landscaping to screen it from the adjacent residential use. Summit Fire Protection Page 4 of 5 Utilities: According to the applicant, sanitary sewer and water service will come from the existing sewer and water mains constructed as part of the Marmon/Keystone site to the east. Water access will be stubbed across Apollo Court and split to serve both the Summit Fire Protection site and the parcel to the north. Stormwater runoff from the subject property will be stored and treated on site. The City Engineer has review the Grading and Utility Plans (see attached memo). Parking: The standards for calculating the off - street parking requirements for office and warehouse uses are outlined in Section 3, Subdivision 5 of the City Code. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the gross building area. As shown in the table above, the total number of required off - street parking stalls for this property is 55. The applicant's plan calls for 48 stalls and another 27 future stalls. If the proposed addition were constructed, it would need 10 additional stalls (22,800 X 90 percent = 20,520 and 20,520 / 2,000 = 10 stalls). Together, the proposed and future parking exceeds the total number of off - street parking stalls required by the ordinance. Roads, Access, Circulation. The standards for access and traffic circulation are outlined in Section 3, Subdivision 5 of the City Code and illustrated in the chart below. The subject property meets all of the requirements of this section. Access and Traffic Circulation Data Gross Area 90% of Gross Area Code Requirement Required Spaces Office 9,636 Sq. Ft. 8,672 Sq. Ft. 3 +1/200 Sq. Ft. 46 Warehouse 20,440 Sq. Ft. 18,396 Sq. Ft. 1/2000 sq. Ft. 9 TOTAL 30,076 27,068 Sq. Ft. N/A 55 As shown in the table above, the total number of required off - street parking stalls for this property is 55. The applicant's plan calls for 48 stalls and another 27 future stalls. If the proposed addition were constructed, it would need 10 additional stalls (22,800 X 90 percent = 20,520 and 20,520 / 2,000 = 10 stalls). Together, the proposed and future parking exceeds the total number of off - street parking stalls required by the ordinance. Roads, Access, Circulation. The standards for access and traffic circulation are outlined in Section 3, Subdivision 5 of the City Code and illustrated in the chart below. The subject property meets all of the requirements of this section. Access and Traffic Circulation Data Item Required Standard Proposed Standard Status Curbing Perimeter curbing Perimeter curbing Compliant Curb Opening 26 feet* 32 feet Compliant Curb Spacing 30 feet from intersection 61 feet from intersection Compliant Access Drive 24 feet 27 and 24 feet Compliant Stall Width 9 feet 9 feet Compliant Stall Depth 18 feet 18 feet Compliant *Measured at ROW line. May exceed with approval of City Engineer. The applicant's plans indicate that they will construct Apollo Court as part of this development. The right -of -way for Apollo Court is labeled as parcel H on their Sketch and Description Plan. This land must be dedicated to the City and Apollo Court must be constructed to City standards. All plans for Apollo Court are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Easements: The plans should show the necessary drainage, ponding, and utilities easements called for by the City Engineer. Summit Fire Protection Page 5 of 5 Park Dedication Section 1001.14, Subdivision 4 states that the park dedication requirement for low labor intensive industrial uses shall be equal to $133 for each 1,000 square feet of proposed building. As a result, the applicant shall pay a cash park dedication fee of $4,000.10 (30,076 sq. ft. / 1000 = 30.076. 30.076 X $133 = $4,000.10). This fee must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. An additional park dedication fee will be required should the applicant construct the proposed expansion. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on January 31, 2001 and on February 28, 2001. Their comments and recommendation are attached. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this application at their February 13, 2001 meeting and they recommend approval of the minor subdivision and site plan to allow the construction a 30,076 square foot office /warehouse facility. This recommendation is based on the findings contained in this report and subject to the conditions listed below. 1. Maintain the perimeter curb setback along the northern fire lane at five (5) feet. 2. Store all trash and recycling material within the principal structure or apply for and receive approval for a trash enclosure. 3. Outside storage shall be prohibited without an approved conditional use permit. 4. The applicant shall submit detailed cut sheets of the proposed shoebox exterior lighting fixtures for City review prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Install additional screening along the western side of the site to screen it from the adjacent residential uses. 6. Plans must show all drainage, ponding, and utility easements required by the City Engineer and deeds conveying the easements shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. A maintenance plan for the native plantings must be submitted and is subject to the approval of the Environmental Specialist prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. The comments in the memo by the City Engineer /TKDA dated March 6, 2001 must be addressed to his satisfaction before a building permit is issued. 9. The applicant shall explore a non - burning strain of prairie grass to be used on the site and a revised landscaping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Specialist before a building permit is issued. John Powell rom: Jason C. Wedel [wedel.jc @tkda.com] ent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 4:11 PM To: jlindahl@nacplanning.com Cc: jpowell @ci.lino- lakes.mn.us Subject: comm #1 1 98501 2 / Summit Fire Protection Jason Lindahl, I have reviewed the revised plans submitted by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, received on March 2, 2001, and have the following comments: 1. The sanitary sewer pipe material is mislabeled as HDPE on the utility plan. 2. The watermain located at the southeast corner of the proposed building is labeled as an 8" tee and as an 8" 90 degree bend. The 8" 90 degree bend label should be removed. 3. The type of connection to the existing 8" watermain located in Apollo Court must be noted. 4. There are several details included in the plans that do not pertain to this project. All unnecessary details need to be removed from the plans. If you have any questions please give me a call. Jason C. Wedel, P.E. phone: 651/292-4630 fax: 651/292-0083 e -mail: wedel.jc @tkda.com •Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson & Assoc., Inc 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 -2140 • ti • 01 -37 Council Member • introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-37 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION ON APOLLO DRIVE TO PROVIDE A SITE FOR SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION WHEREAS, Summit Fire Protection and Ryan Companies submitted an application for a minor subdivision of property within the City of Lino Lakes, and WHEREAS, the application included a Sketch and Description prepared by Metro Land Surveying, dated January 1, 2001 and received by the City January 16, 2001, and WHEREAS, the application meets the subdivision requirements of the Lino Lakes subdivision and zoning ordinances, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes approves the minor subdivision to create the following parcels as described on the Sketch and Description: (attach legal descriptions) Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • • 01 -38 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-38 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION WHEREAS, Summit Fire Protection and Ryan Companies submitted an application for a site and building plan, and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board reviewed the project on February 13, 2001, and recommended approval with conditions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lino Lakes City Council approves the site and building plan as described in the staff report for the March 12, 2001 meeting of the City Council, with the following conditions: (attach conditions of approval) Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • • MEMORANDUM February 15, 2001 to: Milo Bennet from: Jeff Smyser subject: Prairie Grass Controlled Burning cc: John Powell, Marty Aslesen, Brian Wessel At the February 13 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board, the Board had questions about the need to burn native prairie grass. The question came up during the discussion of the Summit Fire Protection project on Apollo Drive. The Board asked for Fire Dept. comment. (Merely a coincidence that this project — Summit Fire Protection — prompted a formal request for info.) The P & Z requests comment from the Fire Dept. regarding the burning of the prairie grass plantings. This request concerns not only this project, but the burns in general. There have been numerous commercial projects in past months that, based on recommendations from the Environmental Board and Marty, have included native prairie grasses in the landscaping plan. The P & Z has expressed concern about this in the past, but this time they specifically asked for Fire Dept. comment. This project will go to City Council in March, but I would greatly appreciate your comments as soon as possible to allow City staff time to examine the issue further before City Council review. Please address your comments to me and I will pass them on to the City Council and P & Z. Thanks for your help. Please feel free to call with any questions at (651)982 -2425. Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax MEMO DATE: February 21, 2001 TO: Jeff Smyser FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Prairie Grass Controlled Burning In my opinion, the use of prairie grass definitely creates a problem. We would like to reduce open burning, not increase it. In the spring and fall, the DNR will ask us not to issue open burning permits during the dry conditions. This always seems to be the time that they want to burn this prairie grass. It has been our policy to be uniform with the burning permits. This means that if we can't give a resident a permit, we will not give a company a permit either. This has created some controversy in the past but we will be sticking to that policy. The reason for a burning permit is to dispose of material for which there are no other practical methods of disposal. Leaves and grass clippings cannot be burned because they can be composted. We allow the burning of tree branches and such because there is no practical disposal site for this material. The intentional planting of prairie grass, which has to be burned on some regular basis, is wrong in my opinion. Just think of the problems we would have if we allowed residents to burn their lawns. This was a common practice many years ago but as population grew, it had to be stopped for both safety and pollution reasons. • • • INDIVIDUAL PROJECT TRACKING SHEET CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL Agenda Item 6B PROJECT #: 21 -11... PROJECT: Prairie Trac DATE OF ORIGIN: TO: Environmental Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: { di • Recommendations are made to incorporate native landscape materials into site designs for new developments. The recommendations for the use of this type of plant material have a scientific basis, and are discussed in the Lino Lakes Environmental Management Plan, Numerous technical papers have been written on this subject. The reasons are simple. Surface water runoff quality improvement by creating buffers to 1. Reduce run -off, 2. Reduce chemical use, 3. Reduce fresh water use all of which have effected the quality of our lakes and groundwater. Other reasons include labor and equipment cost savings to the City when used on public properties, and the aesthetic values that can be achieved. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the Summit landscape plan and questioned se of native materials. They have asked if there are any native plants that do not have to o; e. All native prairie types of plants adapted to fire. Fire is the best tool to use in any areas that have .een invaded by non - native plants (because they have not adapted to fire). According to A Prairie Restoration Handbook For Minnesota Landowners, "If the location of your planting makes it impossible to burn, you can mow and then rake off the cut material to prevent the development of thatch. Mow and rake at the same time you would burn." So the answer is no. The alternative to burning is mowing if it is not physically possible to burn. However, some species may disappear from your planting over time, so one would need to interseed periodically to maintain diversity. Favoring competition (those plants not adapted to fire) gives non - natives an advantage. The same can be seen for most sod areas of the city that have been installed on poorly prepared soils or in areas that are unirrigated. Within a very short period of time they go to weeds, or want to go to weeds and are combatted with huge amounts of herbacides and fertilizers.(that for the most part end up in our lakes) • Mr. Jeff Smyser wrote a letter to Fire Chief Bennett after the last Planning and Zoning Board Meeting. Please find attached. • Chief Bennett responded back to Mr. Smyser. Letter attached. • The Environmental Board needs to respond to the concerns of the Planning and Zoning Board. 17apico= &_Pexpeariov_Boap8 Xirt oO A1vo AWceo- *STAFF COMMENTS/ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: • The benefit cost of prairies (if burned) in relationship to chemical and nutrient poisoning of our lakes and drinking water is not comparable. Although there is not a lot of data on our ground water one can only expect they would reflect some of the chemical compositions found in our lakes. Our Lakes were classified as eutrophic (dead or dying) over 20 years ago. • • •. The City of Lino Lakes weed ordinance written several years ago specifically addressed the concerns of residents interested in prairie landscapes • The following is from the Environmental Protection Agencys' Document "Green Acres." Fire One of the most common arguments asserted in favor of local weed ordinances is fire prevention. As to natural landscapes this argument is predicated on the unproven contention that tall grass and forb stems, commonly planted as part of a prairie or meadow, constitute a fire hazard. This is not, in fact, true. In New Berlin v. Donald C Hagar, 66 United States Forest Service expert David Seaberg testified that a grass fire can sustain high heat for only twenty seconds. In order to ignite wood and sustain a fire potentially damaging to a home, a grass fire must burn within four feet of the home for seven and a half minutes. Jude Gramling agreed, finding no rational basis for the claim that natural landscapes create a fire hazard. t6 According to John Diekelmann, a noted landscape architect and plant ecologist, most prairie or meadow plantings contain a large portion of green leafy material at ground level during most seasons and do not sustain fire. - In short, restoring an area as prairie does not create a fire hazard. Moreover, if fire prevention were the purpose, a rational ordinance would prohibit the accumulation of biomass in a given area based on some index of flammability, not merely undefined weeds. • Fire departments spend large amounts of money fighting wildland fires that could be effectively controlled with periodic burns. • Yes, the business community dues have a preference. They should. The issue of designing with natives in an integrated fashion that is acceptable to our business men and is also resource functional has been accomplished. See attached article "St Jude Medical ". • The touring of sites like St. Jude was listed as an agenda item wish for the February meeting agenda by the Environmental Board at the last meeting. •.... define the following for first option .... Environmental ISSUES: • Defined to some abbreviated degree above Ilaprcv &_Pexpeartov_Boap5 Xtrt ofb Atvo AaKscr Jeff Smyser C rom: Marty Asleson ent: Friday, March 02, 2001 7:40 AM To: Jeff Smyser Subject: RE: Prairie grass burning memo Ok, The report should say that all prairie plants adapted to the prairie environment with fire. So, one will not expect to have as much success without this tool. Some plants will probably be lost and have to be replaced without a burn every 3 or 4 years. If it is not possible to burn native plants every 3 or 4 years, than the alternative is mowing and interseeding at the same times that a burn would be scheduled. I believe it was Milo's position that there is a permit regulation concern, when there exists a weather condition that would prohibit burning, a cultural (resident agreement) concern, or a safety concern in terms of fire and structures. The Chief showed concern for commercial companies obtaining permits from state permit regulators, and asking for permits from the local fire to burn , when residents are unable to obtain a state permit. Are you going to include the Environmental Board Report, or parts of it with this? MA • • Original Message From: Jeff Smyser Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 5:11 PM To: Marty Asleson Subject: RE: Prairie grass burning memo The Summit Fire Protection project goes to City Council March 12, with the report finished March 7. A condition of approval added by the P & Z was to find out if there is a prairie grass that doesn't need burning and get Milo's comments. We have Milo's comments. What should the City Council report say about the not - need - burning question? NAC is waiting to know what to put in the report. Original Message From: Marty Asleson Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 3:17 PM To: Jeff Smyser Subject: RE: Prairie grass burning memo The Environmental Board asked me to make an appearance at the next P & Z Meeting. I would like to start there with Milo present. I think this is the procedure the Environmental Board wants to follow. If something needs to go to the Council after this I would be happy to do the report. What do you think? Let me know. MA Original Message From: Jeff Smyser Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:14 PM To: Marty Asleson Subject: Prairie grass burning memo Will there be a memo on the Environmental Board's discussion of prairie grass burning? I have your report for the meeting. Do you want another memo in the packet for City Council for the Summit report? If so, we will need it in the next day or two. 1 • • 8 - - - -- J33 MARVY SfREEP SKETCH AND DESCRWFION FOR: SUMMIT FIRE MINOR SUBDIVISION AT APOLLO BUSINESS PARK NORTH UNE OF INE -ww.s SOUTHEAST WARIER N88'22.57" I' 404,01• L moan 42-4 i KWrfI15e / A •t'1• /•7'O 631 1 / ? t / 2.7 1 // l V. 1 raise .saw to .t wt 30 (74 .4t r .T OP Mu SNOW 111 • i1 I ) to ea PARCEL G 419.102 wit. 462 eves 5s n 0) 3 ' L�1 0.I rgQl BASEMEN! CI-4 ar'1 ad 5500 -6' • 1 sB _1 -3. (5l0k ea gl ' IrenO3 ye .odl PANT 8 / 0 1. 5.9 pi.3I 50. 06 5 I et�3� 5.1. 00 L 55. PARCEL PARCEL F 0..92 wit. �g�g91og1 692 sues. N88•22'57"E 2277.92' 74Th PARCEL E POINT A so f_37'0348 48.00 POA - 6. x / A v 0.0 Ann : E s:'/•4 39 ' ?1 °'z •: • 1 14 2099.84 SOO Or09 -W 425.00' 'Tr ' q' ', P�949 y1• Q' • f 4125 95 612 43 �Zgg4, 8 /310. • • CO; �/ •0 b= g4/ METRO litifaal8lglal01212 LAND SURVEYING '413 rut Gu.l7 5646 4 tU•IINtS 84.4. 416 45447 Telephonic (86t)766 -0112 r.s(e51/766 -0et2 t -malt •urny8tn.trel.. roe `S • % ck roes cf b 0t • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND (UNLESS OTHERWISE MARKED) • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED 17785 Arab certify Not Nis runes plan or /pat Rea p/prad me under m direct au • end '. 111 . f t am 0 duly he •d Land r • f\,toh of • !rota d ongid P. �Att.in�A� Oats / L27/E _ - Veen/. Ne. 17765 / PARCEL F NOR1OIEAS7 CORNER - - -.� OF S4)7NCAST OUAR1ER \ lwt 5.e N W Sot.. Owen N 3.11. 14 7...404 31. Roy 22, Anoka Cocotte Woes. des.. a oromoodoi at w Nor.. co. N 844 2..40..1 Owrlort 2.44 Sam Oa der. 22 meet. 57 soap. W.L _44_.4 beareg along W Mart. lee N said Seu.wl Ow10r. 2019.66 Net 400.4• Sam 1 d0 84 37 ..Mutes 53 sr:... test 46.37 Net mm.. Uwe 84 .yes 22 ..data 77 .ea.. Went. 70.00 NN* 400.0• Sam t d0.. 37 Write minteew 03 s ya'C s Manes 900 601 m • peel a . be 17 .can... 00 225.00 o to l e West ee N Op..8. Scum N Nye. 23 meet. 57 woo. West. 131.63 fest m•K. Sam 50 4.4550 25 .eela 16 wands Owes see 5.tho •t O..1r. thence With 0 Meese 01 robed. OR . . West doy said Wet NK 42100 Mt to tin Northwester. .e N Uwe Oly N Uwe L550 Rigel -0.h -507 Pint N. L Waft Orb 0 wa.05y la the worded wt Swath thou Nerm.sl0v 41..82 f.L stony said Norm.alarl7 •n5 w W9 • saes- t..g..tJd aw.e sae. t w N..w.l .nip • red. N 799.00 4.4. • .5.1 ape N 29 War. ....es 46 seconds and • ehhew e.lp twe.s Nom 65 dowses 12 .0eut.. 47 saraw4. Cost m0.. wm 50 ayes 20 nes.. 23 words Cost. 14040.1 t. IM Wt N.A. eorM 308..4 feet 1. aa ite s.eM. *Ws w hoto4g de... I. b. .... es /08.47 dew.. Pehl tip: t.aw. With 1 .yes 37 mewl. 03 sec.. E.4. 30.00 Net Mena. S0th.st4y 154.03 hN. dory • . 0.r. sowew le w Nat... hew. • .sits N 23100 feel a. • ern. en. N 36 dee . 02 .44.4 26 sews. th.•.. Smith 35 dgaes 35 i.tes 31 aao.. C.N. lament to me I.1 do .0..4 owe 70.31 Net M shod Nru.•Nergr. M w said 40 more 6o 0awyi Owes North 39 dopes 39 n.ieul s 31 • 0 d0 444 70.31 Net 4050 NrUweot07. 13403 feel 449 • tan.. are ca... to w N.4 .at •.•4.1 • r.4• •l 23100 het w • epee ayes N 38 .yes 02 i.e. 20 sow. thence N.. 1 dg•. 37 meet. 03 0.504 ..et. Iowe.4 a the 1.1 d.oraed awe 3000 Net to I4 Peel N beg. 9. Pew F -1 (06...7, 0.w Ut@y Ce50...O • wpwd ems.. W W. *Wage w N0.ly p.a. ow. one M .ewes Me 1.0••.. 4us.ed x..111 Mel Wt N w 5046 N Owl. N 5.11. 16. Tend.. 31 4094 22. Mate Cme.*a NM.0ay hW Noe. N 5e CRy of Li.• 4. . 16.-of woos Not N0. 1 450.4 Ch. •C.we9 to tin rood. p44 tees. descr ed a h50ewe 65..4500.1 el Me North.. earner N see Luthwl Ow. 6.oa. With 86 degrees 22 .Mules 57 sweets West est.. Msp •10.9 Me Nor. lee N ay S0ON.44 O.orlor • A1.. N 2099.56 fat Mena SwM t degree 37 ...oleo 03 s.eo4s Eat. • Wt.. N 646.37 het Menc. Sas. N Owes 22 Whit. 57 seep.. Weft 70.00 Nett 40..4. Saul. i .y. 37 mewl. 03 ..o.. Cat. 1400 het 9..... 5.. 88 ewe. 22 56.450 57 webs 'W01. *31.64 fest .pee S.. 50 owes 20 meet. 29 .4564 bet. 20119 Net the. Sou. 50 .0..o 18 .dales 27 wen. West. 11198 feet to I4 peel N 5age..40% 44.51.. cent.. 551. 60 depw 10 minutes 27 sew. West. 101.02 Net a 119 West lee al 614 S.rt.eed Wort. then.. 40440 00 .0.w 00 new. 9 .4an. 041 Wog ay West .4 .2160 Net to 44 N.m..4r4y We N m. 731/ of 1e. L0.. Rib.4- 04-407 PNl No. 1. Apo. 06.R esear.9 . w ...al pat Sweet M.¢. Nerm.stplt 36024 fro Mang .41 Men....• 050 .N 449..0.- tang..d ore anc . a the N.t1..es1 Ise9 • red.. N 791.00 Net. • twee enbe N 25 dpw. 40 .lwles 37 0. end • 40.4 Ns48 brow N.50 07 degrees 10 NW.. 19 s..54. Cant mpae Nora 53 ewe. 42 Whit. 59 ..on• NW. 7102 Nat Mot. Nor. 72 445.0. 17' went. 33 seen. WaL 3425 het Mews Now 39 41401. 39 n hw10 31 .Man.. W.L 4475 Nest than. 550. 50 dean 25 ....l0. 20 rows 404. 5184 5414 M0.. Nor. 36 de.. 39 .newt. 30 .trod. Nest. 11400 Nest ..•0e Nr. 50 d50...0 20 .0eeles 19 0..p. Co. 2011 1.0 190.. N.U. 07 .0.w 33 ...as 33 .0.rn• E.1. 127.59 Net be au .8µ N 5.7soM PARCEL G eat M et w SM.. Own. el 5410.. 14 Tee.. 3. Rerye 22. MOSS Comb 4150.0.10. descried as 8450.4.04 N t.e Nr0hwt owner N se. SwUwest O.e.tr4 awe. 5.. 55 0545.. 22 meet. 37 0.un. West. 4.5..54 N..9. deem the North lee el .ay Southeast &Kolor Meter. N 2009.0 hest to the peel N 5.ge5h N the pared to N dew.* Mew South 01 degree 37 r.+wles OS s44. Cast 4.450.. 645.31 wt wage south 04 0.w.. 72 newt. 57 450. West 70.60 hat thaw. smith 01 4.qr. 37 meet« 03 ...w. Get. 1400 I.4. 1..e. 55. 56 awe.! 22 40.4450 S7 ..0...4 W.N. 131.13 I4h• thence Saw. 50 doge. 20 .wiel0. 21 sand• 014 20115 het: 1.005 5.1h 00 Ow. 18 0:41.1 4 West. 225.00 het le the We. lee N 0.N $514014 Owrlr. Mena Neu 00 awes 01 meets 05 1..d• (.4. deny 0.W 501 455 02153 heat a w N4u the d WW 55..41 o.vee: 1I00e Nees' ea 4agr.ww22 sautes 57 .scan. C.4 alum sold North Mae. 54116 hot he .. point N egM.49. Pre. 0.1 (D40 qO t 11O47 1.04...'l) 513 prp.b.. 05.5004 hr 0.4191• *Wog. and wt.. 0,100••• w.. 14n4e and SCOW MO 00.0..9 400454 pare* 5598089 et the Nethwe.l ad.. N W Sow.. Oaer* e4 506.. 10. lawn. 31. Nen . 22. 194. Corot* Yhnwlq thence earth 06 degrees 22 mewl« 57 wands Cast Wn9 w N5... N say 5aethwl Owen 404.01 I.1i Lena 55..0.1.. to • poht 0 w 11.4 tee N said Sort40.4 Owl. distant 39191 Ml South.. 850 444 N....l can. N IOW 551.4.4 Owl.. a W0s.e54 Wag sod N0.' 440 190.. Noway a the poet N bop... NO RTH GRAPHIC SCALE M P.. o-2 (P.aelu. R•aM. EOten.•t) • oera.w sae.. M pubis re..57 p new es. under and .eau w West 3000 fort N the Neu 69100 Net of .• 5546504 Owortr N S.tb. 16 few.. 31. 05.9. 22. A... Carts 448.15(6 P ara' O -3 (Orai.ag. R 4410.17 (5....l) A woe . 5.500.! Tar Wet beeaga w Wills pee.. ewe. eel. 4d owes w West 5000 het et .• North 52100 feel N SO4ew 14 10.0.4 31. Ow. 22. hobs Costa 416.5010 .441 w 6004 30.00 Net N the Nrth 61100 Net thew . P4-w O-• (TS•Wr•.y Roedeq Cee ent) A t.ngry ..000.4 hr 5r4 roan. ...es. woo. pod. and across w Sow.. Owl. N 5414. 15. Tees.. 31. R4ge 22. Awoke Cowl5. 440501. eeea54 . 50550 4 el 40 Nr*4o.1 senor of W4 Swl..e.4 04.50. thaw Sou 84 awes 22 W+o.10 37 seeen4s Watt n.0•.! boon,. 449 u. Nero Ii.. sod Sa14ost O tee. 2099 Se lest I.a•c• S.N. 01 0.w. 37 0.3 sacs . Cast. 501337 hat to ...Met et ..hang; 40.401. contenong WAN 01 Ng. 37 085*. 03 stew. U. 130 •t Uenw 551. 68 deep.. 22 .eel. 57 444 West. 110.00 Net throve North 01 aw. 37 who. 03 ..e0.. West. 14000 Net 11. . North 54 sires 32 Mies*. 57 ..ends Ce. 14000 * l be w peel . Poe. 0-5 (4.0609. • U*W7 Ces4.en4) A 5 .wtw ..44.41 Ar Wry bee. w WORT Peps0.. 50 . 4dr w eras the S5N..1 Oerter el 5.11. 14 To.. 31. Deg. 22. Ape. Cants Wwsesete .007454 es towns.. at the Northeast ere. se said Sw.wsl Omit.' 4rh40 Sa.th 84 erg.. 22 rem. 37 ..e4. Went. .sashed 50.Mq We. the W. 450 el sey 5511501 luster 2059.0 fin a tin peel el 5.ghnegl thence S5. 01 des. 37 meet. 03 ...de C0.4. 6.637 Net win. S5. 84 degrw 22 meet. 57 ssanaa w.l 7000 Net Mr... Net. 03 4ww 15 mewl. IS at.n. E. , 250.10 feel• the. Nee. 01 des. 37 o et4 03 sow. W4L 40000 fort a Use Ner..• N seed 55141st Owlr, We. North 84 .yes 22 .05.µ5a 37 awe. East. •0.00 NO le w pwl .1 004.40 PARCEL H .a port N the SSth.N Owen. el Sect. 15, Tow.. 31. Rego 22. More 4017 irm..at• d.e.M . w.m•ndn9 at w Northeast caner •I say 5550541 Oar!.: I..hee South 09 de.. 22 0eel. 37 504. W44. 55se...d N.h9 W. the N0.. 58• .4 see 55..4.4 Wrlor. 20940 Net M0.... Smith 01 .sea 37 ..hwles 03 0.ohas Cast. 64637 f.1 le a pet to be tweet.. below es Peet •A'. 5.00 1..6.9 w point el 1.0•n4.b thence S5th ea dap.5 22 meat. 37 s84o•ds West. 7000 Net thwe5 S5. 01 de.. 37 0.50!4 03 seta. Cast. 45.00 Net thou. SStheast04. 104.03 feel 8009 • tawg0.W eve 40450 to the Ns4wt .50449 • rod.. el 23100 Net w • 045.1 angle el 34 degrees 02 newt. 24 sews. 445 35.1h 39 depw M 5ee45 31 0..M. Cast. tangent to 410 40007.• awe. 70.31 feet te w Northwesterly .e el the 017 N Lea L.. 199.1 -N -wey Mal Ns 1 A..• Oµ. mmeal.q le the retell. plat Wrest thew• earth 50 degrees 20 000.les 29 wen. [4t. ••n9 0.y Ns.5.lrly .0. 1000 Pest. l5 Rs hN50.tt4 with • IM descried as 0.4.. beg .M 1 a0Jwd7 descried Net 'A': O we. S51. 01 der. 37 odnws 03 won0 Cast. ..00 *.t 1.en. 350450*.* 10435 feel crew a tangenwd t .0 1..o .44/Woos{ 4.44 • rod. N 165.00 feel w eenw de 4 24 4.y50 02 1. 25 hew.: MS.. 551. 35 ...sees 30. 31 seep. E.L *0009004 a west descried 84.0. 70.31 feet t. see Nr.50I54 We d say tee two I0. 06440. 0..4.44 Hart. 19 doer 39 ehal.. 31 heend. Wet. 70.0 feet u50e Nruwt.y 10435 feet Meng • ter9.441 co n. 4awP.• t5 450 Northeast .ewg • .0440• al 16100 feet w • 450445. •n9. ei 35 dw50 02 Wed. 28 hone .440 North 01 des. 37 nseot0 03 se.. W.4. tangent le the 1444..a44 awn. 4.00 Net to ..pet 44 408.:p. oee ( IX rZLT 1 Inc. • 100 R JOB NO. 613 -002 02000 RLK- Kuuelsto, LTD. 1 11- � POND MIX ���� SCALE: 1" 30' PRAIRIE MIX \\/ PRAM MIX / /\ `PRAIRIE MIX / • A EXPANSION AREA 0 • POND MIX 0' 30' 60' 90' i i SUGGESTED PLANT SCHEDULE MOW= REamUDOtle =g- od rNWWN P aKNi O AVG. 2' DIA. WOMAN evx P ONneWS eau Ada er°ce wOnadn OVERBYORY DEWUDatye TRta- :IA. e m WAX N oNnrN r« 4•r naNeaa arse ARA mama a0N!►EA 18irtl eNesN rANx N m CIAO AVG. 11(' DIA =RUBS War seO•oow, ▪ too COMM AMC Osewet eewNa Need Nore+suaas ►1 earaeaNkr noon Nees sedan aged aaadeanNr Prase NOW LANDSCAPE NOTES • ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE SEEDED TO UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED TO BACK .OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED. • RbFER TO SEED MIX TABLES FOR RATE OF PLANTING. • RtFER TO LANDS0APE DETAIL SHEET FOR GENERAL PLANTING NdTES, IRRIGATION NOTES AND PLANTING DETAILS. • AW. HT e' AVG. HT 18' • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHAH SUBMIT A SHOP DRAVANG OF IRRIGATION PLAN TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL POND MIX Cdrnmon Mantas booms Canada demons Wish mikwood Nee England aster blimp ester Brave, fringd Blorbt grass Bs-trefoil %bet ads WIN 00. *tlner ae wed Bonsset Varna cross reed Naha rod fad Early =flow Blue-fog bin Widow aaegeta Tor blazb,gtor Grid biro lobelia. Ryi grave, and llodey lower R Switch gum Erriograss, feet Badt -.id Susan% Oren !slush • Wed crow end gddard 5141011 rue due nos& Pr-FM Blue beaded Devrfe root Oak* AMeander/I Rat. 30 Its /ale (33 kg/ha). bntaliatbn Not. Sedgq meadow grasses, awl meadow forbe are beet installed. by brddamst method, separate from main gran ml; M early spring or of N plan's. Alto no many of these geoid require Ire- gemkwton treatments Coo 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Clties Areal 651 - 454 -0001 MN. Toll Free 1- 800 -252 -1186 Botankd lierne % of MM . An b vw W 5. Madre a 0.1 Ardpa a 0.5 Aster noadrong5d 0.6 Arter perky,' Bromus crate coo D.D.n _doodad 00.4 Dynes **Bus e.0 Eupata1m1 =datum 0.4 pyude grade 0.2 %ado dicta 0.3 HdbpW 6dldtddu 0.7 Hs ArgInide-enred Uotris 110,11,441s 04 Uotrls Lobelia lTtbs sea 01 Il n 1611 Menrdo fMWieea 0.6 NA 35.0 Pollan •Irgehrm 1.0 Poe owing • 10.0 Udall 0.6 Sekpus 0.3 Scads 0.3 Spathe *Mate 10 Verbena hbstata 0.5 Vreda fob:daata • 0.2 Vradawtlan *Okras 0.1 Ian lard 0.4 Toot 100.0 FORBS MIX Common Name Pinot Atter, hbuttlrBY Aster, smooth -blue M4wtd4 Canada Prods Partridge ew white PNae% dear. purple Tith- tnfol, showy O*-er, cornrow fir, tags na P e tamm, snowy Dolorosa, ray -headed Block -eyed Sued Ordered, WIN S Ohio V vulmond"oggd Rates 5% of Prairie Mit should not be Wowed: DieeptIcau Native orbs Bbtdkd Name A#dapiw tuberose Alder rkoid s Aker kids Chanadrata faekxeata Edda candidum Dad purpureum Di+morfim anode= Words hdlantholdes Urals amero Lfakle pyamstechya Mbnada Astulose Plneteman grddifannh Rotblda pinnate Rabxk1 hbta motto i ,e *bane hastata • Verbena stride lak N epodes shag pro Han N purl Weights SubstRutlai to be addd to dative grass mixture M SE Mlnnesete PRAIRIE MIX Common Nome Oluestem, big Grano, *Ideals Nod rye, Canadian sot grans, deaden' Nye grass, annual Ream Fab* (Table F -I, F A or F -3) $witch gross �� em, IittI. grass Rata 30 In/acre (33 kg/ha). Seeding Methods Botankd Name Mao Bouttilaso urtp n M Eyamna o nodose Brae bodtycesus toddle Iotlam NA NA Panitwn *return Sddmchwire samarium Srghahum natant k of Mgr 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 34.0 5.0 20 12.0 12.0 Totak 100.0 8 1 Site Preparatial t fie site should be prepared by pomp to a depth of 127. and then dIskbg. Fertilizer t Ceara ad test, R required, fauns per sot. test mc.nmendatot. The frtllzr used Mudd be a comknardal rode of dos release complete fdrllixr. C) Seed inetallatiod t Seed should be installed wlh a seed dui that w0 apcuratdy meter the types of seed to be plaited and keep d seeds uniformly mixed during the drilling (Truce -twye). The drill should contain a minimum two seed bores; a floe seed box and a bow for leg. /1fjHy seeds, and it should be equippeedd with disc furrow openers and packer onembi to compact the aoi directly over the drill rows Maxbnum row pacing ihould be 8 kith= Small and tiro sheds should be Beaded onto the ground surface from the fine seed box. Lange /fluffy seeds sptdd be placed to 6btdn a fled danOng depth dI X to 1f inch. AJ drill seeding should be done at a right angle to ewfads drainage tl SSeeeeddit g Rata tRatee are speeded In the mixture tabulation fa the specified mix. Harrowing t The site should be lightly harrowed a raked following seen F Pocking t Compact the site following harrowing to ensure a firm seed bed f� Mulch t The site should be mulched and dtlo-anchaed following packing using a weed fret mulch at a rote of 2.0 tone per sae. N) Planting Season t WantMg season Is between Apr' 15 to My 20 and September 20 to October 20. Dormant seeding frown October 20 to November 15, with a maximum sal temperature 6f 50 :I }do III IN a Mow en r } 111 3I r El ; 0 A( 0. 0 W O � � c1 o f z i\ leas 'e RECEIVED JAN 1 2 2001 Cn T Y OF €..C:7' ;i:' 1....c.1.:- _ J RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 1 MID/ OM NI IM fY pfa, psfneualP dna rIPii way +4rwol N tin 0 4M Raba v MM01Wr 0000. ,l 0. Stab, of e,» 14.3. 1 2 2AN 7001 BO PACKAGE N Q 7144IART. 200I C7TT SLENTTAL AS.Lf.YS aim 5FiALL lam: @@ Ymn RAVAGE Slat NOT TO C7LCCP 160 OD N M. PRG!VIB. D. ONLA SW/ M * AT WARCR SQELlPrrL6 ARRAS CLOSEST TO OLDi6l AFlAS AT MK WORD MUM, S SENCNfS. AREAS WITH FORMAL N; 0W PROBLEM SDEWALA TRANSITION PROM EXTRP:OR POOR OOP eiRACe St 5 � NTH ADO. TO BIDE. 'MTN NO PRAM TL4 rn� JAN 1 2 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA 51TE PLAN AI.1 ®.n.,rwaa.w..u,n 0..:058 -coo 386°4, 1- 0 PRE FROT.. lITIUTES RYAN COMPANIES 111aby only to No pn grmutln a 1"1 b* toy brosorbol ArctrarA woo to Woo or be Sow at SM M* AREA GONfUTER ROOM zd• -r . n• -r 1 moire t cueromeR sERVICE ENTRAICE OPEN oFPCE 11111 WORK AREA -q1 RECEPTON WARNS VEST • MAIN ENIRAFGE T2 SANIORT. 2001 CIrT SUSINTTAL 11 SMALL CONTRENCE • OFFCE OFFICE 1, EOARD ROOM - - - -J NIto SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION LJNO LAKES, MINNESOTA PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN RECEIVED JAN 1 2 2001 U]T'i OF •U i ES 1 1 RAW SWYGTO SR= RAU* Ca Mit RWTANNS WALL. WEST ELEVATION VO • Kr 1 I •CP OP ACtINTM CAST CarRETE MIMI/A 6- FAINILO 440 I Fb ROTIYITI ON IT C1 WALL Mallre9 9101130 USW MOIRE - 7 COLON, SOUTH ELEVATION yr • r-o• r _ M MAL. Cal* ALWANIM FRAM MASS WIN7CWS ROCKM0 14.6CtRY PREMNIR•47 NEM CAM:r7 NMI MMMMM 111111•11111•111•1 MMMMM MMMMM 111••11111•111111MII 1111111..M.31.11 i••Nom• MMEMMUMM MMMMM IMI■mommmummirMVIIIIMEMMIONAMMIUMMEMUM .1111111111•1•1111111111 El mi SE •••••••11111111 IA Ili Mr: 1:1111 Ns 11...1111111: MIN :1111I ' ILEN Int 0 0 111•••• ••••• EAST ELEVATION Ver • to* lissam Nam 1111•11111111111111111111M MMMMM MMMMMMM 111111111111 IIRIMINS MEM Wall NM NOM MM MM MMMM 111•11•••••••••111111•1111111111111111111 NM MIMI MMMMM 1111111111111111111111•111111 WIN MN 113:11 111111 ' Eh NM ••dill g ..... ..... •.• ..... ... ... „1„ ..... ..... ............................... CI TOP OP PRIrtpiki, TOP CP OrM Tn. or 'fat-F Tak• Awititob TOP Cr A.e.014ribp$ TCP CSipjk vgb 0 PREr 0 EV PIWAST • 'CAP ft"''''" 4)Nr•F Af-aWr WE' ar-gr C"N" 4$4554? 0 0 0 NORTHELEVATION vs - IOU 111111111111111 U!IU 1'1 ill MUM mom mom Ems Imme Nam 11■111•• MEN MIRE 11•••••••••••••••••••••••••••IMIMIIMMIM CI 1 RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. AMIN Oittlfy v. lAi• pos 00060.001. mat Wm gam* AN MAIr my AIM aproart and rot I an • dity Ao0sterael Ardhat war Iva Inns 0/ Pt Sao of 1.4nreoor. Deb 11.0. 1 Ryan Companies US, Inc. 700 Intenudiond Centre 900 Second Ave= SOtall Mioneapolli, MN, 53402-3387 612/3364200 wrpondo 612/337-5532 fax JAMJARY. 20C1 - CITY SLEMTITAL TCr GT Rya Ta""Mlir4t TCP OP ALLOW \ Tor Or Dont • rr"C ri'"3 D N■C'• ' JAN 1 2 2001 CITY OF LE,! 0 LAKES 74— -- Li M ISUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PP/1P/IG.Fn 172.1 111 • • 9 \bpX- N,r \Pp911e \631- 61frfviva 02/22/01 033047 PM CST 14480)7 0190 PROTECTION 225.00' )ti (1EANOUT r PLUG r VA.vE r 010/0 r 1,1 137.05' FINAL UTILITY PLAN 90 62 e•ee(1 691 1 (0 41 BEND 9 .64 340 l I NYIMAIT w/ W RETENTION POND 010 69seo 17 Lf "1-52 RIM 906.64 G WV 677.24 (NE k 9) LEGEND D • EXISTING SANITARY SEVER ~FOX • PROPOSED MAN1OLE PROPOSED VATERMAIN E51071NG UTILITIES PROPOSED SANITARY • CLENQJT N VALVE GRAPHIC SCALE (M PTV) I Wpb M. 1)0 01WLY 0Y. .0■ 004* Br MAO 4 02/21/01 LHtLAFL 0r _ 1ILL N0.: u,- evv-rcom JOB N0.:631 -001 AO07KNAL COCMME)15 MAO ISSUE f0R P046470 RCM 0410 01/10/DI 01/16/0! 01/24/01 GATE MAO YAV 1 (CPCDY CCR71r1 7w,T 7)41 PLAN, 0PECIFICATIDI 11R PCPOR7 VAS PREPAIIED M NO 0P 100(1 NT 516007 01PCRV(1(04 Am 7647 I AM A OL4.1 Pfa1TCR[D PRQESS10464. CNODCIR UBCR 700 LBWS Of M 57170 Cr 14010[S07A DCLCRIPDOV Br 0000, RCM 1A DEVELOPER RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 700 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -3387 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION PRELIMINARY UTiLJTY PLAN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA C1.1 058 -000 DVd.0R- NN.\Wpeil0 \071- 01FW -f%d.B 02/22/03 090041 PR CST SLIMLY FIRE PROTECTION LEGEND EXISTING EDITDTRS PRROSED CENTONRS X1102.47 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS RILDTK EXISTING ELEVATION SNOT a42 PROPOSED DRAINAGE ARROW OPTIONAL CONTOURS 16.0", 16.0" , 16.0" VARIBLE FRONT a 0.70 FT. 0.00 DITCH BOTTOM SDE RIP RAP DITCH CHECK DETAIL r EARTH DIKE FINAL EROSION -I- GRADING PLAN MMWG 7 ( ( NOTE: CDIITRACTOR TO TRA957104 GRADES TO WATCH COSTING CONDITIONS 908TH (X SAW PROPERTY UNE 905 IS AY ALE 190 RIP RA DITCH FIBER BLANISETI.; > r9 INFILTRATION 20NE GRAPHIC SCALE N > I r HDIT > ION. •• R. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HC SCALE SEDIMENT CONTROL BALES soft . -ALT /3998 S iTK C0lObl TO OQI NUA, TK L - FENCING pw.L IC RAQD ALONG Cd7DJRS CR AS DIRECTCO n ENGIKEL SILT FENCE •T•MAn DAAWOIG DRG RADA ONLY TYPE B -612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER EMERGENCY OVERFLOW BERM OBSERVATION WEIL RUNOFF FILTERS THROUDH WOE CRASS BUFFER STRIP PROTECTI% LAYER Di FLIER FABRIC TRENCH (4 FT. DEEP) 04 1.5-17 INCH DIAMETER CLEAN STONER RUNOfT EJOILTRATE5 THROUGH UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL FLIER FABRIC INFILTRATION TRENCH NOTES PRIER TO ROUGH GRADING INSTALL SILT RICE IN LOCATIONS SHOWN OR AS DIRECTED ST THE ENGINEER. ADDITIONAL 9LT 70110E mu. BE 90009ED WHERE LOCK CONDIT0N5 REQUIRE. ROUGH GRADING SHALL PROCEED ON AN AREA BY AREA BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNCOMPLETED AREAS AS EACH AREA 00100E THE STREET IS GRADED. PROVIDE NAT% TOPSOL, SEED, AND MULCH ANCHORED WITH A STRAIGHT SET DISC WA7HIN b HOURS OF FOIE GRADING MAINTAIN AND REPAIR 9LT FENCES (INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT) UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. SEED TO BE MnDOT TYPE S00, MULCH TYPE 1 (2 TONS /ACRE). SEED FOR PtOINO AREAS TO BE MnOOT TYRE ISA (WET MEADOW NIX). TOPSOIL TO BE RE5PREAD TO A DEPTH a 4 INCHES ON AREAS TO BE SEEDED. INSTALL *0001 FIBER BLANKET AT BASE OF WJILLTRATION DIKES 70 NORMAL WATER ELEVATION (MNDOT 3005) tu0INfL, 0Y: XJ I n .JC0M tl^: - HILL egi ND: u0' F-t , T • 02/21/01 200710734 COCMMCMTS MAY 2 MG 02/18/01 0 /21/01 OA10 ISSTX FOR POlw75 008951750415.01M009 OESLVI77704 84.54 MAO VAS PREPARED RV K OR UIDER MT DIREST SUPERVISION AND TMAT I AM A CULT REGIS70RE0 PRCFESSICML ENGINEER umD TM: LAYS Cr TIC STATE CY NNRCSOTA. BY DATE. REM MO METRO • RUR wl1 R.•A D. 1.111• t...AW MN WIT TWPA754-out n.c 050 T-RML ILL (MIL TN -HIS RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 700 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -3387 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION PRELIIA JARY EROSION + GRADND PLAN LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA C12 1 058 -000 STAFF ORIGINATOR: C. C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 7 F Jeff Smyser March 12, 2001 SECOND READING: Ordinance No. 04 -2001 Accessory Buildings in Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts 4/5 The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 04 -2001 on February 26, 2001. The ordinance amends the zoning ordinance to allow accessory buildings in commercial and industrial zones. OPTIONS 1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance 04 -2001. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • • 04 -01 Council Member its adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved ORDINANCE NO. 04-2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING CODE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY BUILDINGS IN THE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 3, Subdivision 4.D. Accessory Building & Structure shall be amended by adding: 9. Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts. The following summarizes the maximum number, size, and height of accessory buildings allowed in the commercial and industrial zoning districts. a. Only one (1) accessory building shall be allowed not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet except when intended for storage of buses per Sec. 3 Subd. 4.B.2.b. b. Building setbacks shall not exceed base district requirement. c. Building height shall be limited to 12 feet maximum except when intended for storage of buses per Sec. 3. Subd. 4.B.2.b. d. Metal buildings and pole barns are prohibited except when intended for storage of buses per Sec. 3. Subd. 4.B.2.b. e. Roof and exterior color and material shall be compatible with the principal structure. f. Accessory buildings on commercial /industrial sites shall be limited to typical accessory storage uses, no auxiliary commercial /industrial use shall be allowed within an accessory storage building. g. Site and building plan review shall not be required for accessory building construction as an accessory building that meets the requirements listed herein shall be considered a minor project for the purposes of Sec. 2. Subd.5.A.. h. Accessory buildings shall not be located within an easement. i. If the principal building is expanded to cover more of the lot, the accessory building shall be removed if the intended need no longer exists. j. Building permits shall be required as regulated by the Uniform Building Code. Section 2. Section 7, Subd.1.G.of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance (NB District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Accessory building and structure per Section 3. Subd. 4.D.9. Section 3. Section 7, Subd.2.G.of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance (LB District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Accessory building and structure per Section 3. Subd. 4.D.9. Section 4. Section 7, Subd.3.G.of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance (GB District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to read as follows: 5. Accessory building and structure per Section 3. Subd. 4.D.9. • Section 5. Section 7, Subd.4.G. of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance (CB District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Accessory building and structure per Section 3. Subd. 4.D.9. Section 6. Section 8, Subd.l .H.of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance (LI District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Accessory building and structure per Section 3. Subd. 4.D.9. Section 7. Section 8, Subd.2.H.of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance (GI District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Accessory building and structure per Section 3. Subd. 4.D.9. Section 8.This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days after publication in accordance with the City Charter. ADOPTED by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2001. ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk • • CITY OF LINO LAKES John Bergeson, Mayor AGENDA ITEM 7 G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 12, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution 01 -45 Approving Minor Subdivision of VFW Property on Apollo Drive VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The Circle Lex VFW Post #6583 owns property on Apollo Drive. The property was originally about nine acres, but was effectively cut in two by Apollo Drive. The application is to split off a piece of 1.5 acres. The intent is to sell the new lot to Lino Lakes Dentistry, which wants to build a new office building on the site in the near future. ANALYSIS The site is zoned GB General Business. The minimum lot area is 20,000 sf, with a minimum lot width of 100 ft. Although the larger site technically is still one large tax parcel that is crossed by the Apollo Drive road easement, we need to look at the actual remaining pieces of land on both sides of Apollo to ensure that the minor subdivision will allow for future lots that will meet the zoning requirements. As shown on the survey, there will be 1.47 acres remaining on the north and 4.1 acres on the south. Both have adequate area and road frontage. The City and Anoka County have an joint powers agreement regarding access management on Apollo Drive. To comply with this agreement, we are requiring a joint driveway on the new parcel and the remaining land to the west (the 1.47 acres). This driveway easement must be shown on the survey. We also are requiring a shared driveway agreement between the two parcels. On February 13, 2001, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the minor subdivision with two conditions: 1) a revised survey document is provided indicated a shared access drive with the piece to the west and 2) a shared driveway agreement is provided for the access drive. If these documents are provided in time for the March 12 City Council meeting, the City can approve the minor subdivision. If they are not provided, staff will pull the item from the agenda and schedule it for the March 26 meeting. MUSA ISSUE In 1999, the City approved a site plan and CUP for a new building addition to the existing VFW post on Lake Drive at Lois Lane. However, that site is not within the MUSA. A condition of approval for that site plan and CUP approval was that "the MUSA designation for this parcel shall be resolved prior to the utility connection." That is, the new building won't be connected to utilities until it has MUSA. This prevents the building from being constructed without MUSA. The City will not have MUSA to allocate for the site until the comprehensive plan is approved by both the City and the Metropolitan Council. One option was for the VFW to take the MUSA from their Apollo Drive site and put it on the Lake Drive site for the new building. However, that could interfere with the ability to sell the Apollo land. Staff has discussed this with Mr. Dean Johnson, Post Commander of the VFW. Mr. Johnson informs us that they would prefer to keep the MUSA on the Apollo site and wait for new MUSA for the Lake Drive site. Therefore, the new building at the existing Lake Drive VFW will wait until the comprehensive plan is approved by the City and the Met Council. The City can then allocate MUSA to the VFW site. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 01 -45 approving the minor subdivision (if the required revised survey and shared driveway agreement documents are provided before the meeting.) 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 01 -45 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-45 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF VFW PROPERTY ON APOLLO DRIVE WHEREAS, Circle Lex VFW Post #6583 owns property on the north side of Apollo Drive within the City of Lino Lakes, and WHEREAS, VFW Post #6583 submitted an application for a minor subdivision of its property, and WHEREAS, the application included a survey prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated , 2001 and received by the City , 2001, and WHEREAS, there must be a shared access driveway and a shared driveway agreement to comply with the joint powers agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and Anoka County, and WHEREAS, the application meets the subdivision requirements of the Lino Lakes subdivision and zoning ordinances and includes the shared driveway and agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes approves the minor subdivision to create the following parcels as described on the attached survey document: (attach legal descriptions and survey and shared driveway agreement) Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Bow maw. Amigronsigi, SCHOOL 11111Wormiri HMO girkaggrato tiiPIFF Mai - COUMT7— MfamAY 003 I • MOP' —.?l G##-- Or 1•W4 PL-A.F #1016W -t5 - *of Amirm_muarz Fit4W4 • , MBROA‘ --7,-411111111iiinEr. -110111M1104 B.MHELt• !RI 0: 04- A 100 MINOR SUBDIVISION Circle Lex VFW Post #6583 7868 Lake Dr. Lino Lake, MN 55074 (651) 784-9313 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION That part of Lot 16, Auditors Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying within the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, except the North 693.00 feet and the West 660.00 feet thereof. Reserving and subject to a roadway easement over the southerly 33.00 feet thereof. PROPOSED PARCEL A DESCRIPTION The East 412.07 feet of Lot 16, Auditors Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying within the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Tying south of the North 693.00 feet and lying north of the 100.00 foot rood easement for Apollo Drive os per Doc. No. 143411. PROPOSED PARCEL B DESCRIPTION That part of Lot 16. Auditors Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County. Minnesota, lying within the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Tying south of the North 693.00 feet and east of the West 660.00 feet and west of the east 412.07 feet and lying north of the 100.00 foot road easement for Apollo Drive as per Doc. 411. Anoka Co. C.I.M. Southwest Corner Sec. 8, T.31, R. 22 cvo GRAPHIC SCALE 50 100 200 400 00292 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. / LL-AC STREET (STATE TRUVC MNVAY M L . -•- . L NO. 49) M • Anoka Co. C.I.M. ") 121.88 537.01 N89`00.00"w 1/4 Corner — • - :; Sec. 8, T.31, R. 22 `– S. line of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 8, T.31, R.22 Co Area north of Apollo Drive easement 129,544 sq. ft. 2.97 acres N89 °06 '02" W 247.33 , 20 20 k PARCEL B 64,203.36 sq. ft. 1.47 acres M N rn 2 N00 °4 20 so –S. line of the N. 693 feet 659.40 C-� 0 o�N � QC-) W "00 ° ' 4) a CL L 373 ` O �� eooc 1 �9n5a'- �rti P pot eos � 5 00 00 { iso ^O 1 / 412.07 412.07 PARCEL A 65,340.50 sq. ft. 1.50 acres 418.60 23 „ 6555 p�a6.25.3� 0 6 Area south of Apollo Drive easement 196,582 sq. ft. 4.51 acres Area south of Apollo Drive easement minus Lilac street 178,653 sq. ft. 4.10 acres N t1 h CV c A .. I < o Denotes Iron Set I • Denotes Iron Found Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or direct supervision and that / am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under of t State of Minnesota. Dated this Si% day of A101-41-7 License No. a53 4) under my the laws , 2007. E.G.RUID 4 SONS, INC. LAND SURVEYORS SIS0 LEXINGTON AVE. NO. CIRCLE PINES, MINNESOTA 5501.4 -3625 TEL. 1163 -186 -5555 FAX 163- 186 -6001 AGENDA ITEM 7H STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 12, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -40, Receive Feasibility Study for the Saddle Club Utility and Street Improvements. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: At the February 26, 2001, City Council meeting, a study was ordered to evaluate the preferred method of providing sanitary sewer and water service to the Saddle Club property. This information will be used by the developer to guide their water and sewer design within the subdivision. The report is being prepared and will be delivered to the City Council at the meeting Monday evening. The only City Council action requested at this time is to receive the report. Further action on improvements outside the limits of the subdivision is delayed until the proposed subdivision receives preliminary City Council approval. • OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -40, Receiving the Feasibility Study for the Saddle Club Utility and Street Improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 01 -40 be adopted. • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -40 RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT— SADDLE CLUB UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted February 26, 2001 a report has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of Saddle Club by constructing sanitary sewer and watermain extensions, and reconstructing streets, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The report is hereby received by the City Council. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of March, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chei Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 12, 2001. Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 71 STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 12, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -41, Ordering Preparation of a Study for the 2001 21st Avenue Street and Utility Improvements VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: This project involves the construction of roadway and storm sewer along 21st Avenue, south of Main Street. 21st Avenue is located along the border between Centerville and Lino Lakes and is immediately west of the existing Amoco station. It will also provide an improved roadway access to the new Dairy Queen on the southeast corner of 21st Avenue /Northern Lights Boulevard. The installation of roadway and storm sewer in this area has been considered previously. A TKDA study dated January 26, 1998, and revised February 23, 1998, was submitted to the City and evaluated not only storm sewer and streets but also sanitary sewer and water service to this area. City staff is re- initiating the public improvement process for the following reasons: 1. The cost information contained in the original study is over three years old and should be updated. 2. The cost for these improvements will be recovered through assessments to benefiting properties in Lino Lakes, and through the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Centerville. We want to provide current cost information to Centerville before proceeding with re- construction of the roadway. We also want to ensure the Statute 429 process, including the assessment process, remains intact. 3. Ownership of some effected properties in Lino Lakes has changed since 1998. 4. Additional detail is available regarding use of the adjoining properties. The Feasibility Study will be received at the April 9, 2001 City Council meeting. Assuming concurrence by the City of Centerville, the construction would take place this Spring. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 -41, Ordering Preparation of a Study for the 2001 21st Avenue Street and Utility Improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 00 -41 be adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -41 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF STUDY FOR THE 2001 21ST AVENUE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve 21st Avenue, south of Main Street, by installing roadway and storm sewer improvements, and WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvements are feasible and as to whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of March, 2001. • Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 12, 2001. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk • o!p! ©:�ii:i owl wr- =oo l®vaQzrim Tom PELTIER LAKE latitn: I ptuitAlamlowig I1jfP'4iE w0 Itat■ d T1 ,,, no _pm Vp 40 2 m vs wo ©0000w;al. -. Pdaigl �QOoy�� s rs oat= delG.a -1r a eh isougapoongoiame °naafi wira�►, oaf li Ij �P OGc© -mm n't� �� E 0000ppT p n� u„�Q @� O mi ara o © ©ri 0 Qo GGO V voBa o:�oa�000� 10 ao c4 4 o woEms -R' 043 •%TA e °041.4 BUSINESS CENTER NJ J NORTH • r-� 89•14'15 "E 106.36 66.5 0 ° ---e r_— - -- 317.0_0_ DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT -� �'_f - 1 It • A 1 A 1 " / 111 1 ,- 1 1 1 A 1 1 11 /\ Fi / .1 -,.1 I. N85•03'07 "W o co O \ 1 IN 1 \11 1 1 • \/ . 402.00 r- r- -1- r._ _NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE I- - - / NW 1/4 OF SEC. 24, T31, R22 J A • \ 1 1 1 t 589'14'15"W 213.22 1 327.58 NORTHERN LIGHTS 19, 989°52'51 "W BOULEVARD 1---- 22-501 - - --� I°. L 1 N89°52'51 °E ,_I q J I- 225.01 I I I9.. 01 IM 2 2 -1 1 ^I L -J 0 ui co N N89°52'51 "E 225.01 235.00 89•47'03 "E 4 275.00 N - F 0 47'03 "W 1313.92 S89'47'03 "W 275.00 IAA O 0 CO N00°29'20 "E 1 no R'2p0 367.90 35'0.43 103.20 aa1 35�0 83. ,yo .y0 30d 202.47 t 0 430 130_1 i X30 i I o 01 to 40 C# Co. 01 to s w 01 SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 03 '*OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 24, 0t T31, R22 503.60 40 'h111101 GRAPHIC SCALE N89'47'03 "E 706.07 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS THUS: 10-1 F.10 AGENDA ITEM 7J • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 12, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 00 -42, Ordering Preparation of a Study for the 2002/2003 Street Reconstruction Projects VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: In order to initiate the process for construction of the next street reconstruction projects, the City must first select the roadways to be included in the projects. We have a ranking of the roadways based on their pavement condition. To properly prioritize the roadways, the City needs to consider whether or not the roadways have sanitary sewer and water. If not, we should evaluate the necessity, and timeline, for installation in the future. The purpose of the study is to re -rank the roadways after incorporating utility service and need issues. The Study will be received at the April 9, 2001 City Council meeting. The initiation of detailed feasibility studies on the roadway segments slated for reconstruction should be initiated on April 23, 2001. • OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 00 -42, Ordering Preparation of a Study for the 2002/2003 Street Reconstruction Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 00 -42 be adopted. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 00 -42 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF STUDY FOR THE 2002/2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHEREAS, it is proposed to initiate street reconstruction improvements for construction in 2002 and 2003, and WHEREAS, the existence of City sanitary sewer and water service should be considered when selecting the streets to be reconstructed, and WHEREAS, feasibility studies of the streets to be reconstructed should be initiated in April of 2001 in order for the construction activity to begin in 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to which streets should be considered for street reconstruction after evaluating the availability of City sanitary sewer and water service. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of March, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 12, 2001. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 7K • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 12, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -43, Order the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Black Duck Lift Station VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: The existing Black Duck Lift Station is located on the west side of Black Duck Drive, south of Lantern Lane. A new lift station is proposed to replace the existing lift station which was constructed in 1970. In 1994, the City prepared plans and specifications to construct a new lift station and rejected the bids due to the high contract prices received. The City also initiated a project in 1998 to replace this lift station but terminated the process due again to estimated costs. The waste water flow volumes that enter the existing lift station have continually increased and the lift station needs to be replaced in order to operate in a safe and efficient manner consistent with current design standards. The pumps in the station have to operate much more frequently each hour than desired. The station also has very little storage which causes the sanitary sewer to be surcharged. As with the earlier project, staff is proposing to construct a new lift station consisting of a wet well and submersible pumps on the east side of Black Duck Drive within the unimproved Captains Place right -of -way. This will allow the existing lift station to remain in service as the new one is constructed. The new design will also eliminate the pump house as all of the components of the new lift station will be underground except for a control panel and a generator shelter. The cost of replacing this station will continue to increase. The cost of maintaining the station will also continue to increase as the components wear out more quickly due to high cycling frequencies. Replacing the station with a submersible pump system will also reduce OSHA confined space entry by City Public Works personnel. The funding for the project is proposed to come out of the City's Trunk Area and Unit funds. It is this type of project for which the Area and Unit funds were specifically created. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -43 Order the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Black Duck Lift Station project. 410 RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Adopt Resolution No. 01 -43 Order the Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Black Duck Lift Station project • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -43 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS — BLACK DUCK LIFT STATION WHEREAS, it is proposed to construct lift station improvements to replace the existing Black Duck lift station, and WHEREAS, it is proposed to finance the project using City Trunk Area and Unit funds and not direct special assessments to benefiting properties, and WHEREAS, it is proposed to advertise for bids to construct the proposed improvements NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer, John Powell, is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of March, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 12, 2001. Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk