Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/09/2001 Council Packet
AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday July 9, 2001 6:30 P.M. 5:30 P.M. — 6:30 P.M. CONDUCT INTERVIEWS TO FILL VACANCY ON PLANNING & ZONING BOARD Call to Order and Roll Call: Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) July 9, 2001 (Check No. 62247 through 62396 in the amount of $291,141.07 ) ii) Centennial Fire District B) Consideration of Not Waiving Monetary Limits on Tort Liability Per MN Statute 466.04, Al Rolek 2. Open Mike 3. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek No Report 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consider Employee Request for Extended Leave of Absence 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) Quad Cities Police Force Proposal 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) Consideration of Resolution No. 01 -90, Authorizing Condemnation of 6993 Black Duck Drive and 6998 Black Duck Drive for Public Trail 7. Community Development Department Report A) Saddle Club, Heritage Development, Cindy Sherman (NAC) i) First Reading, Ordinance No. 10 -01, Rezoning (4/5 vote); Page 1 AGENDA ii) First Reading Ordinance No. 09 -01, Comprehensive Plan Amendment for MUSA Reserve Allocation (4/5 vote); iii) Resolution No. 01 -77 Preliminary Plat (3/5 vote); B) Highland Meadows West 3rd Addition, TSM Development, Cindy Sherman (NAC) i) Resolution 01 -91, Preliminary Plat (3/5 vote), C) Lino Lakes Family Dentistry, Cindy Sherman (NAC) i) Resolution 01 -92, Site Plan Review (3/5 vote), D) Centennial School District #12, Al Brixius (NAC) i) Ordinance 14 -01, Rezone (4/5 vote) ii) Resolution 01 -93, Minor Subdivision (3/5 vote) E) Behm's Century Farm Park Addition, Century Farm Development, Jeff Smyser i) Resolution 01 -94, Final Plat (3/5 vote); F) Consider Resolution 01 -95, 2001 Sealcoating G) Consider Resolution 01 -96, 2001 Wear Course 8. Unfinished Business A) June 19, 2001 Council Work Session Minutes 9. New Business 10. Community Calendar, July 10, 2001 through July 23, 2001: A) Thursday, July 12, 2001, 7:00 a.m., EDAC Meeting B) Wednesday, July 18, 2001, TBA, Special Environmental Board Meeting C) Wednesday, July 18, 2001, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session D) Monday, July 23, 2001, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 11. Adjourn Revised dib 7/5/01 10:41 AM Page 2 EXPENDITURES JULY 9, 2001 • • Date: 06/21/2001 Time: 15:41:44 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) • Entry Journal #: (R) 1814 - 1815 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000158 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 2 2,217.77 2,217.77 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 1 240.00 240.00 .00 .00 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 202.10 202.10 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 55.93 55.93 .00 .00 000366 ORIENTIAL TRADING COMPANY, INC. 1 79.30 79.30 .00 .00 000465 MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTECH GROUP 1 111.00 111.00 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 103.35 103.35 .00 .00 000624 ANTEC CORPORATION 1 1,209.90 1,209.90 .00 .00 000691 CAMERON HOMES 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 000718 HOMES BY J BROWN 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000728 DAVE REGAL CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 111/19 EMERALD CUSTOM HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000731 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 1 140.00 140.00 .00 .00 000732 GRANDE DESIGN, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000733 P C COLLOVA BUILDERS 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000734 RADECK, GINA 1 31.00 31.00 .00 .00 000735 WIERZBINSKI, JULIE 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 000736 WAGAMON BUILDERS 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 570.00 570.00 .00 .00 001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 1 1,753.00 1,753.00 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 68.00 68.00 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 1,064.79 1,064.79 .00 .00 • - Date: 06/21/2001 Time: 15:41:50 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ve # Name Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001291 DEAN GALLERY, INC. 1 35.04 35.04 001349 E. H. RENNER & SONS, INC. 1 70.00 70.00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 2 1,253.02 1,253.02 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 673.02 673.02 001680 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 1 614.40 614.40 001932 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1 3,866.69 3,866.69 001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 1,080.00 1,080.00 002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 348.00 348.00 002152 KLOSNER - GOERTZ 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 002208 LELS 1 132.00 132.00 002230 DIVINE, MARY 1 54.48 54.48 002245 LANG BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 002517 MEADOW VIEW HOMES 1 8,500.00 8,500.00 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 1 53.80 53.80 003091 MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1 264.00 264.00 003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 2 1,141.32 1,141.32 00 XCEL ENERGY 1 951.16 951.16 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 14,446.51 14,446.51 003491 PETTY CASH 1 64.09 64.09 003509 PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 003661 R & T SPECIALTY, INC. 1 512.63 512.63 003804 ROBINSON LANDSCAPING, INC. 1 18.37 18.37 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 418.21 418.21 004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 55.90 55.90 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 873.30 873.30 004388 TEAMSTER LOCAL 320 1 707.54 707.54 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 3 1,719.99 1,719.99 • .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Date: 06/21/2001 Time: 15:41:58 Ve� # Name CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004671 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 886.33 886.33 .00 .00 006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 228.58 228.58 .00 .00 900058 HANSON BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900066 AVALON HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900224 NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 900436 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. 1 475.00 475.00 .00 .00 900443 SHERBURNE COUNTY GOVERMNENT CENTER 1 195.00 195.00 .00 .00 900474 VAUGHAN, ED 6 2,975.00 2,975.00 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 3 144.76 144.76 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 73 58,634.28 58,634.28 .00 .00* • • Date: 07/03/2001 Time: 12:42:26 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1833 - 1833 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 1 226.69 226.69 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 2 767.74 767.74 .00 .00 000118 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, INC. 2 91.25 91.25 .00 .00 000158 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 1 1,505.52 1,505.52 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 1 112.00 112.00 .00 .00 000174 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1,483.03 1,483.03 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 3 46.72 46.72 .00 .00 000219 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING, INC. 2 785.89 785.89 .00 .00 000221 RAFFERTY, ROBERT G. 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000223 SPRING LAKE PARK, CITY OF 1 1,123.54 1,123.54 .00 .00 000224 ST. FRANCIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 1,266.80 1,266.80 .00 .00 C. O'CONNELL, TERESA 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000327 MACH, DAVE 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 000329 ROLEK, ALAN 1 244.74 244.74 .00 .00 000403 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF 1 1,651.92 1,651.92 .00 .00 000440 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 119.28 119.28 .00 .00 000478 ARCADE ASPHALT, INC. 1 16,855.00 16,855.00 .00 .00 000514 GCS SERVICE, INC. 1 72.00 72.00 .00 .00 000540 AUTO- MEDICS, INC. 1 47.93 47.93 .00 .00 000548 GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000617 MICRO WAREHOUSE 1 431.83 431.83 .00 .00 000621 LYDEN, CHRISTOPHER 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 • , Date: 07/03/2001 Time: 12:42:33 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost -0 000647 DINN BROS., INC. 1 8.00 8.00 .00 .00 000679 RIDIG HITCH, INC. 1 118.79 118.79 .00 .00 000693 HAGLIN, NEAL 1 400.00 400.00 .00 .00 000738 COMBINED RESOURCES SYSTEMS 1 63.07 63.07 .00 .00 000741 DIXON, LORIE 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 000744 DEER MEADOWS DRIVING RANGE 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 000745 LARSON, DEBBIE 1 31.00 31.00 .00 .00 000749 MATYKIEWECZ, THERESA 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 000750 NORTH STAR TURF 1 128.59 128.59 .00 .00 000751 STOUTEN, LORI 1 21.00 21.00 .00 .00 000752 TITTERUD, LORAH 1 38.00 38.00 .00 .00 000753 WONG, ROBIN 1 24.00 24.00 .00 .00 000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 30.70 30.70 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 2 40.96 40.96 .00 .00 001053 CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL ALIGN, INC. 1 140.00 140.00 .00 .00 001070 CENTURY FENCE COMPANY, INC. 1 30.62 30.62 .00 .00 01111 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 1,852.01 1,852.01 .00 .00 001114 CHICAGO TITLE 1 4,962.00 4,962.00 .00 .00 001209 CORSON, KIRK 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001262 D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY, INC. 2 420.63 420.63 .00 .00 001298 DEGARDNER, RICK 1 20.01 20.01 .00 .00 001329 DONLIN, AMY 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001350 E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. 1 2,548.51 2,548.51 .00 .00 001390 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 1 43.75 43.75 .00 .00 001473 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL HEALTH CARE 1 186.00 186.00 .00 .00 001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 677.27 677.27 .00 .00 001570 FRIDLEY; CITY OF 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 • Date: 07/03/2001 Time: 12:42:40 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Ve # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001630 GOA COMPANY, INC. 1 28.60 28.60 .00 .00 001981 INTEGRA HOMES, INC. 1 344.74 344.74 .00 .00 002120 KELLY AGENCY, INC. 1 149.00 149.00 .00 .00 002142 KIEGER ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 3,195.00 3,195.00 .00 .00 002220 LABOR RELATIONS, INC. 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 002242 LANYON, SCOTT 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 002243 LANE, SHARON 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 002270 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, INC. 1 784.99 784.99 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 7.69 7.69 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS 1 149.61 149.61 .00 .00 002387 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 59.75 59.75 .00 .00 002540 MEDICA 1 20,984.77 20,984.77 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 180.13 180.13 .00 .00 002720 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTY MGMT ASSOC 1 77.00 77.00 .00 .00 002820 MN. POLLUTION CTROL AGENCY 1 250.00 250.00 .00 .00 002900 MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY 1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00 C. MRPA 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 003120 NATIONAL REC /PARK ASSOCIATION 1 160.00 160.00 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 43.65 43.65 .00 .00 003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 1 57.09 57.09 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 1,459.98 1,459.98 .00 .00 003491 PETTY CASH 1 51.14 51.14 .00 .00 003492 PETTY CASH 1 300.00 300.00 .00 .00 003661 R & T SPECIALTY, INC. 1 1,339.65 1,339.65 .00 .00 003868 S & S WORLDWIDE, INC. 1 124.89 124.89 .00 .00 003915 SCHAPS, JAMES 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 24.44 24.44 .00 .00 • Date: 07/03/2001 Time: 12:42:50 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Name Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 94.10 94.10 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,313.82 1,313.82 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 585.61 585.61 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 1,709.00 1,709.00 .00 .00 004481 TREHUS, MIKE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 11,751.71 11,751.71 .00 .00 004759 WAITE SMITH, LINDA 1 317.90 317.90 .00 .00 005022 PITNEY WORKS RESERVE ACCOUNT 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00 006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 900056 IN THE LINE OF DUTY, INC. 1 695.00 695.00 .00 .00 900096 ZYCH, JOSEPH 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 900549 A SEASON TO TASTE CATERING, INC. 1 100.07 100.07 .00 .00 900590 LASER TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1 224.60 224.60 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 8 797.50 797.50 .00 .00 950061 KUKONEN, ROD 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 109 93,158.22 93,158.22 .00 .00* • • Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 08:31:13 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) • Entry Journal #: (R) 1841 1841 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000082 J. H. LARSON COMPANY, INC. 1 65.66 65.66 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 455.94 455.94 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 61.98 61.98 .00 .00 000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 641.03 641.03 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 1 44.27 44.27 .00 .00 000465 MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTECH GROUP 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,017.06 1,017.06 .00 .00 000509 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY 1 2,100.00 2,100.00 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 58.24 58.24 .00 .00 000558 BACCHUS HOMES, INC. - 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 000682 BAILEY, GREG 1 900.00 900.00 .00 .00 Oil, TAYLOR MADE HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000718 HOMES BY J BROWN 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000723 RFK CONSTRUCTION 1 397.84 397.84 .00 .00 000754 AALLWAYS ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1,574.11 1,574.11 .00 .00 000755 BIESANG, PHIL 1 142.00 142.00 .00 .00 000756 GONYEA HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000757 HANSON, JOHN & AMEE 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000758 IMPERIAL HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000759 LAMBRECHT, JIM 1 44.00 44.00 .00 .00 000760 MERRIMAC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1 4,157.10 4,157.10 .00 .00 000761 NBL FINANCIAL CORPORATION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 • Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 08:31:16 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost II, 000762 R E HUGHES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000763 RICHARDS, BRIAN- MAGICIAN 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 000764 SISKA GROUP, INC. 1 388.05 388.05 .00 .00 000765 TARCON, INC. 1 2,843.00 2,843.00 .00 .00 000766 ADAMS COOPER MARKS 1 113.16 113.16 .00 .00 000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 1 188.35 188.35 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 114.10 114.10 .00 .00 000980 UNITED RENTALS 1 164.00 164.00 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 93,534.00 93,534.00 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 345.51 345.51 .00 .00 001116 CHARLIE'S TREE SERVICE 1 320.85 320.85 .00 .00 001255 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 1 66.90 66.90 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 237.71 237.71 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 2,354.93 2,354.93 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 550.83 550.83 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 1 36.97 36.97 .00 .00 GORHAM BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 001720 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. 2 469.35 469.35 .00 .00 001826 HEDBERG CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 2 1,027.96 1,027.96 .00 .00 001947 INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 002152 KLOSNER- GOERTZ 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002245 LANG BUILDERS, INC. 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 002249 DAN BROWN BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002517 MEADOW VIEW HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 2 390.91 390.91 .00 .00 002580 METROPOLITAN AREA 1 16.00 16.00 .00 .00 • Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 08:31:19 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002691 MIKE TORKELSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 003816 RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC. 004060 SNAP -ON TOOL, INC. 004342 T & D HOMES 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 004709 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 900058 HANSON BUILDERS, INC. 900076 PROCRAFT HOMES, INC. 900224 NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS 900305 HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. 900436 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. 900440 STERLING HOMES, INC. 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. Grand Totals: • 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 2 5,950.00 5,950.00 .00 .00 1 29.91 29.91 .00 .00 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 1 2,397.68 2,397.68 .00 .00 1 123.00 123.00 .00 .00 5 2,500.00 2,500.00 .00 .00 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 1 108.00 108.00 .00 .00 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 4 2,000.00 2,000.00 .00 .00 1 106.17 106.17 .00 .00 76 139,348.57 139,348.57 .00 .00* ' Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 09:09:25 Operator: JAL • Ranges: Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Options: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 62191 0 62194 0 62195 62196 0 0 0 62201 0 0 62205 0 .0 9 0 62210 0 0 0 62212 0 62213 62214 0 0 62216 0 62217 0 0 0 62218 0 62219 • 1823 1843 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF AVALON HOMES BACCHUS HOMES, INC. CAMERON HOMES CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI CENTENNIAL LAKES POLIC CHICAGO TITLE DAN BROWN BUILDERS, IN DAVE REGAL CONSTRUCTIO DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DIXON, LORIE EMERALD CUSTOM HOMES GONYEA HOMES, INC. GORHAM BUILDERS, INC. GRANDE DESIGN, INC. HANSON BUILDERS, INC. HANSON BUILDERS, INC. HANSON, JOHN & AMEE HEDBERG CONSTRUCTION HOMES BY J BROWN HOMES BY J BROWN HOMES BY JAMES, INC. HOMES BY JAMES, INC. ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCI IMPERIAL HOMES, INC. INTEGRA HOMES, INC. INTL UNION OF OPER ENG KLOSNER - GOERTZ KLOSNER - GOERTZ LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, LAMBRECHT, JIM LANG BUILDERS, INC. LANG BUILDERS, INC. LARSON, DEBBIE LELS PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6417 C * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6584 C * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW * * * * * * ** SAFETY CAMP * * * * * * ** SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** FINAL REQUEST /CIVIC COMP * * * * * * ** REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6650 L REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6202 S DENTAL INSURANCE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6726 B REIMS BLDG ESCROW /2230 T REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6731 C REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6496 N REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2330 I REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1376 H REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6701 C REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2222 T REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2201 L REIMS BLDG ESCROW /2206 T REIMS BLDG ESCROW /2254 L REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6479 N PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2284 L * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1387 H * * * * * * ** PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /498 AQ * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /307 LI * * * * * * ** REPAIR /REFINISH * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /7129 S * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1489 S * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 202.10 1,651.92 500.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 570.00 1,852.01 4,962.00 500.00 500.00 1,312.03 20.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 2,500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 475.00 3,866.69 500.00 344.74 348.00 500.00 1,000.00 284.99 44.00 1,000.00 500.00 31.00 132.00 • Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 09:09:26 Operator: JAL • Check # 0 0 62220 0 0 0 62221 0 0 62225 62227 62228 62230 0 0 62233 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62240 0 62242 4 5 0 Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount MATYKIEWECZ, THERESA MEADOW VIEW HOMES MEADOW VIEW HOMES MEDICA MERRIMAC CONSTRUCTION MIKE TORKELSON DEVELOP MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE NBL FINANCIAL CORPORAT NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS P C COLLOVA BUILDERS PERA /REGULAR PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, I PROCRAFT HOMES, INC. R E HUGHES CONSTRUCTIO RADECK, GINA RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN RFK CONSTRUCTION SISKA GROUP, INC. SPRING LAKE PARK, CITY ST. FRANCIS POLICE DEP STERLING HOMES, INC. STOUTEN, LORI T & D HOMES TAYLOR MADE HOMES TEAMSTER LOCAL 320 TITTERUD, LORAH VAUGHAN, ED WAGAMON BUILDERS WIERZBINSKI, JULIE WONG, ROBIN REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 20.00 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6330 C * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMS BLDG ESCROW * * * * * * ** 8,500.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 5,567.87 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2190 P * * * * * * ** 4,157.10 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /2225 T * * * * * * ** 500.00 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 264.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6572 C * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6655 L * * * * * * ** 1,000.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2224 T * * * * * * ** 1,000.00 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /250 LI * * * * * * ** 500.00 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 14,446.51 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6705 T * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6662 L * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6679 L * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 31.00 LIFE INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 756.26 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6331 C * * * * * * ** 397.84 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2218 T * * * * * * ** 388.05 SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** 1,123.54 SAFE /SOBER REIMBURSEMENT * * * * * * ** 1,266.80 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /2369 E * * * * * * ** 2,000.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 21.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6619 T * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6676 C * * * * * * ** 500.00 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 707.54 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 38.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6763 T * * * * * * ** 2,975.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2212 T * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 30.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 24.00 Total for Dept ** 80,310.99* 0 DEER MEADOWS DRIVING R PRACTICE BALL RENTAL Total for Dept 201 0 62190 0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. NATURE CALLS, INC. GAMES /T- SHIRTS /PULLOVERS CAPS /T- SHIRTS /BALL BAGS PORTABLE RESTROOMS Total for Dept 202 ADULT IN 30.00 30.00* ADULT SP 1,395.93 ADULT SP 288.22 ADULT SP 43.65 1,727.80* 0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. GAMES /T- SHIRTS /PULLOVERS OTHER Total for Dept 204 0 0 62247 0 62235 • BURSACK, ELIZABETH FRIDLEY, CITY OF M RICHARDS, BRIAN -MAGIC S & S WORLDWIDE, INC. SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES ENTERTAINMENT I MAGICIAN SUPPLIES SUPPLIES Total for Dept 205 109.59 109.59* SPECIAL 30.70 SPECIAL 50.00 SPECIAL 225.00 SPECIAL 124.89 SPECIAL 34.86 465.45* • Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 09:09:28 • Check # 0 62189 62190 0 0 0 0 62229 62235 0 Operator: JAL Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. BIESANG, PHIL HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH SAM'S CLUB, INC. VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CAPS /T- SHIRTS /BALL GOLF PAYMENT PIZZA BALLS /BATS /T'S SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PHOTOS Total for Dept 207 YOUTH IN 112.00 YOUTH IN 240.00 BAGS YOUTH IN 1,462.89 YOUTH IN 142.00 YOUTH IN 108.00 YOUTH IN 305.82 YOUTH IN 20.94 YOUTH IN 29.97 YOUTH IN 2.97 YOUTH IN 123.00 2,547.59* 62190 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. CAPS /T- SHIRTS /BALL BAGS YOUTH SP Total for Dept 208 0 A SEASON TO TASTE CATE SUPPLIES MAYOR /CO O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JUNE 11, JUNE 13, JUNE 1 MAYOR /CO Total for Dept 401 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62236 0 0 • A T & T WIRELESS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DINN BROS., INC. FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONA MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE SHIPPING DRUG TESTING ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ADMINIST HAGLIN, NEAL STIPEND ADMINIST LABOR RELATIONS, INC. CONFERENCE /L W SMITH ADMINIST MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINIST METROPOLITAN AREA LUNCHEON ADMINIST MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTY DUES ADMINIST PITNEY WORKS RESERVE A POSTAGE ESCROW ADMINIST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST SHERBURNE COUNTY GOVER REGISTRATION /D TESCH ADMINIST SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI CONNECTOR ADMINIST WAITE SMITH, LINDA MEALS /LODGING ADMINIST Total for Dept 402 O A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE SENIORS O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SENIORS O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SENIORS O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SENIORS Total for Dept 406 O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE O ROLEK, ALAN MILEAGE /JAN -JUNE Total for Dept 407 FINANCE INS FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE 466.66 466.66* 100.07 974.00 1,074.07* 29.39 85.98 8.00 186.00 62.51 400.00 40.00 632.53 16.00 77.00 5,000.00 20.00 195.00 24.44 317.90 7,094.75* 61.33 46.60 4.05 4.00 115.98* 55.26 40.14 425.00 14.00 244.74 779.14* O A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE ECONOMIC 27.24 ' Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 09:09:29 Operator: JAL • Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC 62203 DIVINE, MARY MILEAGE /PARKING /MEALS ECONOMIC O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ECONOMIC O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ECONOMIC Total for Dept 415 0 62202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CORSON, KIRK QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING DEAN GALLERY, INC. FRAME PLANNING DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE PLANNING FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PLANNING IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH LANE, SHARON LYDEN, CHRISTOPHER MEDICA RAFFERTY, ROBERT G. RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN PRINTING QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND MEDICAL INSURANCE QUARTERLY STIPEND LIFE INSURANCE PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING SCHAPS, JAMES QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JUNE 11, JUNE 13, JUNE 1 PLANNING ZYCH, JOSEPH QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING Total for Dept 416 O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE Communit O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Communit O MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE Communit O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Communit Total for Dept 418 0 0 62206 0 0 0 0 0 0 62222 0 62223 0 0 0 62232 0 62235 0 • AALLWAYS ASSOCIATES, I C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVE FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. GALL'S INC. IN THE LINE OF DUTY, I LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, LASER TECHNOLOGY, INC. MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTEC MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTEC MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFE PETTY CASH R & T SPECIALTY, INC. R & T SPECIALTY, INC. RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SAM'S CLUB, INC. ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVER CAPS /PENS /MAGNETS /MUGS POLICE OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE DENTAL INSURANCE POLICE REGISTRATION /DAVE P POLICE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS POLICE UNIFORM SUPPLIES TRAINING TAPES REPAIR /REFINISH PARTS MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE MAY USAGE VEHICLE REGISTRATION SUPPLIES SHIRTS SHIRTS LIFE INSURANCE SUPPLIES TUITION /6 POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE 44.20 54.48 26.88 207.53 8.00 368.33* 150.00 35.04 22.10 12.09 149.61 100.00 150.00 207.53 150.00 4.00 225.00 410.00 150.00 1,765.37* 22.11 8.47 850.00 8.00 888.58* 1,574.11 155.06 602.18 66.90 329.00 140.00 261.62 36.97 695.00 500.00 224.60 6,947.83 53.80 37.00 111.00 15.00 300.00 1,339.65 512.63 104.00 380.38 2,100.00 Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 09:09:31 Operator: JAL Check # 0 62238 62243 Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount STREICHER'S, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. VERIZON WIRELESS SUPPLIES S & W PRACTICE MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 0 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI BUDGET 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 421 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Total for Dept 422 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .07 0 0 0 62224 0 0 62234 62237 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62207 0 0 • A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, SOD A T & T WIRELESS AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, ARCADE ASPHALT, INC. D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT ECM PUBLISHERS, INC FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE KIEGER ENTERPRISES, IN MEDICA NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, MONTHLY SERVICE CHECK STREET LIGHT /WOODR ASPHALT PAVING /REPAIR BROOMS DENTAL INSURANCE STREET SIGNS ADVERTISING LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL MEDICAL INSURANCE SIGNS SIGNS RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC REPLACE CULVERT ROBINSON LANDSCAPING, SOD STAR TRIBUNE, INC. SUBSCRIPTION T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS ASPHALT UNITED RENTALS WATER TANK KIT Total for Dept 430 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU AUTO- MEDICS, INC. BOYER TRUCKS, INC. CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GOA COMPANY, INC. HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA SUPPLIES TOW #337 PARTS REPAIR DUMP DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES GREASE SMALL TOOLS POLICE POLICE POLICE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET 94.10 873.30 886.33 18,340.46* 93,534.00 39.78 20.57 765.00 8.00 94,367.35* 66.30 28.62 1,057.53 .80 1,313.82 2,467.07* 154.80 61.22 75.13 4,855.00 281.55 88.41 550.83 43.75 58.30 11.67 3,195.00 622.59 57.09 1,141.32 23.40 2,683.00 18.37 55.90 585.61 164.00 14,726.94* 90.99 47.93 188.35 140.00 22.10 11.01 56.07 28.60 329.48 Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 09:09:33 Operator: JAL Check # 0 0 0 0 0 0 62229 0 0 0 0 0 62192 0 62198 62199 0 0 62200 0 0 62207 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62239 0 0 0 0 62197 0 62199 0 0 0 0 62207 0 0 0 • Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description LEEF BROTHER, INC. LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, I MEDICA MENARDS, INC. MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERI NORTH STAR TURF PETTY CASH RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN RIDIG HITCH, INC. SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, SNAP -ON TOOL, INC. SHOP TOWELS SWITCH KEY MEDICAL INSURANCE PARTS /ROLLER TRAILER MOBILE ANTENNA EJECTOR DISC SUPPLIES LIFE INSURANCE PARTS IN TOOLS TOOLS Total for Dept 431 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR MAT LEASE ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMEN MAPS CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI STAMPS CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF MONTHLY SERVICE COMBINED RESOURCES SYS FUSER OIL BOTTLE CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES DALCO, INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES GCS SERVICE, INC. SERVICE CALL J. H. LARSON COMPANY, BATTERY MEDICA MICRO WAREHOUSE MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERI RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, A T & T WIRELESS ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. ARCADE ASPHALT, INC. CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS CENTURY FENCE COMPANY, CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPL DEGARDNER, RICK DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA MEDICA MENARDS, INC. MEDICAL INSURANCE CARTRIDGE RADIO REPAIR LIFE INSURANCE EROSION CONTROL TONER ANNUAL BILLING /COPIER Total for Dept 432 SOD MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE ASPHALT PAVING /REPAIR POST /FABRIC MONTHLY SERVICE NIFTY NABBERS MILEAGE DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY PARTS /SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS MEDICAL INSURANCE LUMBER Dept FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET Amount GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME INS GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS INS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS 7.69 59.75 425.00 24.36 725.89 128.59 23.51 4.60 118.79 91.25 29.91 2,553.87* 314.37 55.93 119.28 68.00 1,027.55 63.07 301.49 144.76 237.71 6.94 7.01 72.00 65.66 425.00 431.83 60.00 4.00 3,267.00 10.00 228.58 6,910.18* 71.89 114.62 141.57 12,000.00 1,753.00 30.62 37.24 139.08 20.01 121.59 53.64 460.31 698.48 1,487.50 155.77 Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 09:09:35 Operator: JAL Check # Page: 7 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 TRAINERS /PAINT /BALLS O SUPPLIES 62229 SUPPLIES O MONTHLY SERVICE 62231 MONTHLY SERVICE 0 INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 450 0 0 0 62207 0 0 0 62226 62229 0 • METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH QWEST QWEST RELIASTAR LIFE A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES MEDICA MRPA NATIONAL REC /PARK ORIENTIAL TRADING PETTY CASH MEDICAL INSURANCE REGISTRATION /BARRY ASSO DUES COMP SUPPLIES SUPPLIES RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 451 PARKS 85.09 PARKS 30.20 PARKS 5.30 PARKS 58.24 PARKS 65.24 PARKS 22.00 17,551.39* RECREATI 76.50 RECREATI 26.52 INS RECREATI 29.93 RECREATI 23.94 RECREATI 292.53 B RECREATI 70.00 RECREATI 160.00 RECREATI 79.30 RECREATI 5.31 RECREATI 12.80 776.83* O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC MAY 30, JUNE 4, JUNE 6 Total for Dept 452 O A T & T WIRELESS O DONLIN, AMY O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. O GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE O INTERPOLL LABORATORIES 0 KUKONEN, ROD O LANYON, SCOTT O MACH, DAVE 0 MEDICA 0 O'CONNELL, TERESA O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC O TREHUS, MIKE MONTHLY SERVICE QUARTERLY STIPEND LONG TERM DISABILITY QUARTERLY STIPEND WATER SAMPLES QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND MEDICAL INSURANCE QUARTERLY STIPEND LIFE INSURANCE MAY 30, JUNE 4, JUNE QUARTERLY STIPEND Total for Dept 461 PARK BOA 100.00 100.00* ENVIRONM 67.18 ENVIRONM 150.00 INS ENVIRONM 5.73 ENVIRONM 150.00 ENVIRONM 50.00 ENVIRONM 150.00 ENVIRONM 150.00 ENVIRONM 100.00 ENVIRONM 191.25 ENVIRONM 150.00 ENVIRONM 1.80 6 ENVIRONM 225.00 ENVIRONM 150.00 1,540.96* 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SOLID WA 1.27 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE SOLID WA 42.50 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SOLID WA .40 O TARCON, INC. DUMPSTERS SOLID WA 2,843.00 Total for Dept 462 2,887.17* O BAILEY, GREG COST SHARE /OAK WILT O CHARLIE'S TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY 0 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 463 FORESTRY 900.00 FORESTRY 320.85 INS FORESTRY 5.72 FORESTRY 191.25 FORESTRY 1.80 1,419.62* Date: 07/05/2001 Time: 09:09:37 Operator: JAL • Page: 8 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O A T & T WIRELESS O ADAMS COOPER MARKS 0 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, 62193 ANTEC CORPORATION 62248 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 62204 E. H. RENNER & SONS, I O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 62207 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 62208 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, 62211 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN 62215 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES 0 KELLY AGENCY, INC. O MEDICA 62231 QWEST O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN O U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, 62241 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, 0 W. W. GRAINGER, INC. 62246 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE COMMISSION /PERCENTAGE CLAMP /FUSES REPAIR /WELL #2 UTILITY POSTAGE DENTAL INSURANCE PUMP INSPECTION /WELL #2 LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE CONTAINER DEMURRAGE CLEAN CATCH BASIN PREMIUM BOND MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE WATER METER PARTS FLANGE KIT /TOUCH PAD FLASHLIGHT MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 494 O ADAMS COOPER MARKS 62248 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 62208 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, 0 MEDICA 0 MN. POLLUTION CTROL AG O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN O W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIAT 0 XCEL ENERGY COMMISSION /PERCENTAGE UTILITY POSTAGE DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS MONTHLY SERVICE MEDICAL INSURANCE CLASS /TIM H LIFE INSURANCE PARTS /SERVICE /MATERIAL MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 495 O E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. FIELD STAKE Total for Dept 499 WATER 203.55 WATER 87.91 WATER 754.59 WATER 1,209.90 WATER 172.75 WATER 36.48 WATER 70.00 WATER 19.90 WATER 114.02 WATER 307.20 WATER 1,253.02 WATER 1,080.00 WATER 149.00 WATER 323.18 WATER 38.11 WATER 9.60 WATER 14,149.39 WATER 1,719.99 WATER 469.35 WATER 951.16 23,119.10* SEWER 25.25 SEWER 172.76 SEWER 36.47 SEWER 19.88 SEWER 307.20 SEWER 323.15 SEWER 250.00 SEWER 9.60 SEWER 1,483.03 SEWER 1,459.98 4,087.32* OTHER 2,548.51 2,548.51* Grand Total 291,141.07* Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax July 5, 2001 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council • City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12739 — 12757, in the amount of $31,930.77 is hereby requested. DATE CHECK# NAME 07/05/2001 12739 07/05/2001 12740 07/05/2001 12741 07/05/2001 12742 07/05/2001 12743 07/05/2001 12744 07/05/2001 12745 07/05/2001 12746 07/05/2001 12747 07/05/2001 12748 07/05/2001 12749 07/05/2001 12750 07/05/2001 12751 07/05/2001 12752 07/05/2001 12753 07/05/2001 12754 07/05/2001 12755 07/05/2001 12756 07/05/2001 12757 • • Centennial Fire District Page 1 of 1 Check Register Besty Buy Cameron Haapoja Centennial Utilites City of Lino Lakes Determan Brownie, Inc. Loffler Business Systems Milo Bennett NFPA International Orkin Exterminating Postmaster Reliant Energy Minnegasco Rolltex Computers Sentry Systems, Inc. Trans - Alarm, Inc. Verizon Wireless Viking Office Products North Suburban Regional Mutual Aid Assn. Paper Direct Steve Twait ACCOUNT 42130 - Equipment Expense 42110 - Other Maintenance 42251 - Station 1 - Gas 41000 - Payroll Expense 42110 - Other Maintenance 42110 - Other Maintenance 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 42110 - Other Maintenance 42180 - Office Supplies 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 42110 - Other Maintenance 42110 - Other Maintenance 42220- Travel, School, Conference 42240 - Telephone Expense 42180 - Office Supplies 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense Total AMOUNT 2,562.98 90.00 168.52 27,895.82 86.01 17.56 113.75 199.45 102.24 102.00 94.57 25.60 60.55 20.00 9.18 68.64 200.00 103.90 10.00 $31,930.77 • • • Consent Agenda Item STAFF ORIGINATOR: Al Rolek DATE: 07/9/01 TOPIC: Consideration of not waiving monetary limits on tort liability per MN Statute 466.04 BACKGROUND Each year, the City has the option of waving it's monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects: If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. If the city does waive the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory limits apply would also be limited to $1,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. If the city does waive the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. The city carries $1,000,000 in excess liability coverage ($1,000,000 per occurrence and annual limit). The City of Lino Lakes has never waived its' monetary limits on tort liability. • • • OPTIONS 1. The City of Lino Lakes does not choose to waive its' monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. 2. The City of Lino Lakes chooses to waive its' monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. RECOMMENDATION Recommend option 1. • • • LMC1T LIABILITY COVERAGE - WAIVER FORM Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects: • If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,000.on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. • If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000. on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $1,000,000., regardless of the number of claimants. ▪ If the city l•vaives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. This decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and return this form to LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further information, contact LMCIT. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney. The City of Lino Lakes accepts liability coverage limits of $ 2,000,000 Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). from the League of Check one: _ The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. Date of city council meeting July 9, 2001 Signature Position City Administrator Return this completed form to LMCIT, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN. 55103 -2044 Page 1 of 1 0 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL TIME SHEETS DATE: JUNE, 2001 FROM: John Bergeson, Mayor FOR: June 6, 2001 Regular Council Work Session All Present June 11, 2001 City Council Meeting All Present June 19, 2001 Regular Council Work Session Carlson Absent III June 25, 2001 City Council Meeting All Present NAME: DATE: • CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL TIME SHEETS DATE: JUNE, 2001 FROM: Jeff Reinert, Council Member FOR: June 6, 2001 June 11, 2001 • June 19, 2001 June 25, 2001 • Regular Council Work Session All Present City Council Meeting All Present Regular Council Work Session Carlson Absent City Council Meeting All Present NAME: DATE: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL TIME SHEETS DATE: JUNE, 2001 FROM: Jeffrey O'Donnell, Council Member FOR: June 6, 2001 Regular Council Work Session All Present June 11, 2001 City Council Meeting All Present SJune 19, 2001 Regular Council Work Session Carlson Absent June 25, 2001 City Council Meeting All Present NAME: DATE: • CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL TIME SHEETS DATE: JUNE, 2001 FROM: Donna Carlson, Council Member FOR: June 6, 2001 Regular Council Work Session All Present June 11, 2001 City Council Meeting All Present • June 19, 2001 Regular Council Work Session Carlson Absent June 25, 2001 City Council Meeting All Present NAME: DATE: • 0 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL TIME SHEETS DATE: JUNE, 2001 FROM: Caroline Dahl, Council Member FOR: June 6, 2001 Regular Council Work Session All Present June 11, 2001 City Council Meeting All Present June 19, 2001 Regular Council Work Session Carlson Absent June 25, 2001 City Council Meeting All Present NAME: DATE: • • • AGENDA ITEM 4A STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 9 July 2000 SUBJECT Twenty -Seven month Leave of Absence for Shawn Silvera VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 BACKGROUND Officer Shawn Silvera and his wife have accepted positions with the Peace Corps in Honduras, and will be departing 24 July 2001. This is a two-year assignment, with the Silveras returning in the fall of 2003. Shawn has requested the city grant him an unpaid leave of absence in order that he may return to the police department after his Peace Corp assignment. The city council would have to make an exception to our current leave of absence policy. It is the recommendation of Linda Waite Smith, and Chief Pecchia that an exception be made to our current policy, and offer a twenty -seven month leave of absence to officer Silvera. Shawn has been an asset to the department, both on the street and behind the scenes with his knowledge of computers and our computer network. The experience that Shawn will acquire in Honduras, specifically increased knowledge of the Spanish language, would be of value to Lino Lakes as our community continues to diversify. As this is not a single incumbent position, our plan would be to replace Shawn when he leaves this summer. We would reincorporate him back into the department when he returns, given a vacancy exists in 2003. It is assumed that continued growth of the community would merit at least one new officer that year. Shawn understands however, there are no guarantees. OPTIONS 1. Agree to Officer Silvera's request for a twenty seven -month leave of absence. 2. Deny his request. RECOMMENDATION Number One. • STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 5A David J Pecchia, Public Safety Director July 9, 2001 Joint Law Enforcement Proposal 2002 Simple Majority Presentation of the Joint Law Enforcement 2002 Proposal for the Centerville, Circle Pines, Lexington and Lino Lakes communities. • OPTIONS 1. Continue researching the Joint Law Enforcement proposal. 2. Discontinue researching the Joint Law Enforcement proposal. RECOMMENDATION 1. Continue researching • • • AGENDA ITEM NO. 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 9, 2001 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution 01 -90, Authorizing Condemnation at 6993 & 6998 Black Duck Drive For Public Trail VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: For the past several years, the City of Lino Lakes has been attempting to place a public trail at the north end of Reshanau Lake. At the April 9, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council approved the purchase agreements to acquire the necessary land located at 6993 Black Duck Drive and 6998 Black Duck Drive. In June, 2001 staff was informed by one of the property owners that the mortgage lenders of his property require a complex, time consuming, and expensive process to authorize the sale of the land to the City. Subsequently, both property owners are requesting the City initiate a "friendly" condemnation process to acquire the land described in the purchase agreements. Therefore, staff is recommending the City Council direct the city attorney to begin condemnation proceedings to acquire the necessary land at 6993 Black Duck Drive and 6998 Black Duck Drive as previously agreed with the property owners. All components of the purchase agreements will remain in effect. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution 01 -90. 2. Do not approve Resolution 01 -90. 3. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 7/2/01 RD /Corr /Council /greensheet condemn schut kuzel • • • Council Member adoption. introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-90 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION AT 6993 BLACK DUCK DRIVE AND 6998 BLACK DUCK DRIVE FOR PUBLIC TRAIL WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes wishes to construct a public trail at the end of Black Duck Drive for the enjoyment of area residents; and WHEREAS, the property owners at 6993 Black Duck Drive and 6998 Black Duck Drive have agreed to sell a portion of their property for this public trail; and WHEREAS, the property owners are requesting the City to initiate a "friendly" condemnation process to acquire the land described in the purchase agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, the Council directs the City Attorney to begin condemnation proceedings to acquire approximately 3,035 square feet of property located at 6993 Black Duck Drive and 6998 Black Duck Drive. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of July, 2001. John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i • AGENDA ITEM 7 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: July 9, 2001 TOPIC: FIRST READING: Ordinance 09 -01 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: MUSA Allocation FIRST READING: Ordinance 10 -01 Rezoning Resolution 01 -77: Preliminary Plat Saddle Club, Old Birch St. ACTION REQUIRED: 4/5 vote on Ordinance 09 -01 4/5 vote on Ordinance 10 -01 3/5 vote on Resolution 01 -77 BACKGROUND This application was originally scheduled for the June 11 City Council meeting, then the • applicant agreed to postpone it to the June 25 meeting. At the June 25 meeting, the City Council tabled it, with the applicant's agreement, to the July 9 meeting. Members of the Council listed a number of issues for which they requested more information. These issues were listed in the letter to Heritage Development of June 27 (copies were forwarded to the City Council). • The following report addresses those issues. It also clarifies the Environmental Board recommendation and includes a park dedication breakdown. The original June 11 report from NAC analyzing the project is attached. Issues Listed At the June 25 Meeting 1. Ownership of land to provide for the access roads on both sides of the project. Heritage Development has stated that they have purchased the land for the eastern access connecting to Kildeer Drive. They stated they have come to agreement with the property owner for the western access to Old Birch St. and are waiting for that firm's processing of the transaction. It is the developer's responsibility to complete this transaction. The proposed Resolution 01 -77 approving the preliminary plat includes a condition of approval that requires acquisition of the right of way before the final plat is recorded. We could tighten that up to require that the acquisition be completed prior to a development • Saddle Club July 9, 2001 page 2 agreement being signed. This would ensure that the right of way is acquired before any site work begins. 2. The direction utilities will come from to serve the project: south down Old Birch St. or east across Old Birch St. City staff recommended extending the utilities to serve the Saddle Club Addition from the west. This recommendation was made because it provides the most economical solution to serving the proposed subdivision with sanitary sewer and water. The east -west portion of Old Birch Street must be replaced regardless of whether the utilities come from the west or the north to serve the Saddle Club. This portion of the street will provide the access to the site and is currently in poor condition. If utilities were extended from the north to serve the Saddle Club, then the east -west portion of Old Birch Street would still need to be replaced and would double the amount of street to be constructed. The cost to extend utilities from the north is also more expensive because both the sanitary sewer and the watermain would have to been jacked under CSAH 10 to get to the Saddle Club Addition. The cost break down is shown in item number 8. • 3. Further information on the need for and cost of constructing a cul de sac on the north end of Old Birch St. The north connection of Old Birch Street to CSAH 10 is currently unsafe. The site distances at this location are inadequate and do not allow enough time for drivers to safely pull onto CSAH 10. As part of the Saddle Club Addition the east -west portion of Old Birch Street is being reconstructed to accommodate additional vehicle traffic as well as directing traffic flow to a connection with CSAH 10 that has good sight distances. City staff feel that this provides a good opportunity to close the north connection. to CSAH 10 and construct a cul -de -sac. The majority of the existing residents on Old Birch Street are in favor of constructing a cul -de -sac. The cost to construct a cul -de -sac is approximately $10,000 if constructed within the existing 66- foot right -of -way. 4. Information regarding the ability of Birch St. to handle project - generated traffic. City staff believes that Birch St. (County State Aid Highway 10) can accommodate traffic from the project. We are seeking information from Anoka County to confirm or correct this assumption. We expect to have more information for the City Council meeting. • • • • Saddle Club July 9, 2001 page 3 5. Advisability of creating two double frontage lots in the Oaks of Lino development to the north, and 6. Screening of those Oaks of Lino lots, including agreement by those lot owners. These two items result from the second access, connecting to Kildeer Drive. City staff directed the developer to include this connection. It is not advisable to have a single access off Old Birch St. to serve 46 homes. That would not provide reliable emergency access. In addition, our subdivision ordinance prohibits cul de sacs greater than 500 feet long. The primary reason for such a regulation is emergency access. In addition to that safety concern, there is the urban design and transportation planning question of proper traffic circulation. In neighborhoods with one access road, all traffic must use that one route. All traffic going in and all traffic going out travels that one route. This creates problems, particularly at peak times. Traffic is so concentrated that congestion results. The problem becomes worse when traffic from all the cul de sac neighborhoods empty out onto one main roadway at the same time, concentrating traffic even more. It is not so much the number of vehicles as the fact that they all have to go the same way together —they are all forced to be in the same place at roughly the same time. Providing additional routes to use disperses traffic, spreads it out so that all the cars aren't all in the same place at the same time. Double- frontage lots are not ideal, but we must weigh the various factors, including the safety and transportation planning issues summarized above. The Oaks of Lino lots in question are 922 and 998 Aspen Lane. Both lots are about 250 feet deep. The houses are close to Aspen Lane on the north side. Both lots have ponds between the houses and the southern property lines. The developer has informed City staff that the owner of the eastern lot (998 Aspen Lane) brought up a desire for a berm as a screening device. There is not enough land between the road, trail, and the property line for a berm. In addition, trees will not live on a small berm. If the property owner is willing to grant an easement to allow a larger berm that would be mostly on his property, a berm becomes a possibility. Perhaps the better alternative for screening is vegetative plantings such as trees and shrubs. Note that the traffic on the new road will run parallel to the rear lot line, so headlights will not point at this lot. Vegetative screening can eliminate this issue for the other lot, especially since the house is several hundred feet from the road. • • • Saddle Club July 9, 2001 page 4 7. Reasons for the recommendation to deny the project from the Planning & Zoning Board. The Planning & Zoning Board did not state reasons for the recommendation to deny. The attached minutes accurately reflect the discussion. Boardmember Lyden asked about costs of utilities, opposed requesting additional MUSA, and said that houses these days are getting too big for the lots, so he would prefer R -1X zoning. Staff notes that utility costs are addressed in the feasibility study prepared by the City Engineer and summarized below. The application is a request for allocation of some of our MUSA reserve. This project is in the location designated for use of MUSA reserve and meets the requirements of the City's infill and MUSA reserve policies. The property is one parcel that is cut in half with the current zoning and MUSA line. The MUSA and rezoning requests include only the southern half of the property. 8. Cost breakdown of road and utilities to serve the project and who will bear the costs. The cost break down to serve the Saddle Club with utilities from the west or from the north is shown below: The prices shown include a 10% contingency and 20% for engineering, legal, and administrative costs. These costs assume that the City would pay for the extension of the trunk watermain. The estimated Trunk Assessments for the Saddle Club are $180,157. Using the total costs from the table above, the net impact on the City trunk funds is as follows: Service from the West Service from the North - $98,389 - $309,859 Extending the utilities from the north will cost the City an additional $211,470 Environmental Board Recommendation There was some discussion about the Environmental Board review of the project. As noted in the April 28 memo attached to the staff report, the Environmental Board recommended approval of the project, with some additional comment. A July 2, 2001 Sanitary Sewer Watermain Streets Total Service from West $77,662 $48,919 $151,965 $278,546 Service from North $113,385 $71,982 $304,649 $490,016 The prices shown include a 10% contingency and 20% for engineering, legal, and administrative costs. These costs assume that the City would pay for the extension of the trunk watermain. The estimated Trunk Assessments for the Saddle Club are $180,157. Using the total costs from the table above, the net impact on the City trunk funds is as follows: Service from the West Service from the North - $98,389 - $309,859 Extending the utilities from the north will cost the City an additional $211,470 Environmental Board Recommendation There was some discussion about the Environmental Board review of the project. As noted in the April 28 memo attached to the staff report, the Environmental Board recommended approval of the project, with some additional comment. A July 2, 2001 • • Saddle Club July 9, 2001 page 5 memo from Marty Aslesen, Environmental Specialist, is attached to clarify the meaning of the April memo, which apparently caused some confusion. Park Dedication The issue of park dedication bears clarification. The developer will receive park dedication credit for the actual trail corridor only. This corridor is 20 feet in width, and is based on a proposed route included in the environmental management plan. Under the City's new park dedication policy, the dedication for this project will include the trail corridor and $56,710 in cash. This is calculated as follows: per lot charge $1665 number of lots x 46 cash contribution = $76,590 land dedication (trail corridor) in acres 0.71 land value per acre x $28,000 total land value = $19,880 cash contribution $76,590 minus land value - $19,880 balance of cash contribution = $56,710 Attachments: • May 9, 2001 P & Z minutes • Revised memo on Environmental Board recommendation. • The original June 11 report from NAC analyzing the project. Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2001 Page 17 Mr. Powell stated that easement is related to the outlot and when it is considered in the future, that easement requirement can be addressed. Chair Schaps noted the Park Board has indicated the intent to continue that trail. Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Spirit Hills preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 22, Block 1, shall be eliminated or revised to meet the 135 foot lot depth as measured in the center of the lot. 2. An area shall be provided for the lift station necessary to serve this site subject to approval by the City Engineer. 3. All comments as listed in the May 1, 2001 memorandum from TKDA shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to proceeding to final plat. 4. Park dedication in area of Lot 30, value to be determined, and dedication of an upland trail corridor around the lake that borders this property subject to approval by the City staff. 5. Appropriate permits shall be acquired from Anoka County:for access to the adjacent roadways. 6. The developer shall address all provisions /conditions, outlined by Rice Creek Watershed. The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6- H. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Heritae Development, Saddle Club Site, Old Birch Street, Comprehensive Plan',Amendment for MUSA, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat eta Staff presented the application submitted 6y, Heritage Development for Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning, and preliminary plat for a portion of an area included in their application for preliminary plat. 'The property commonly known as the Saddle Club is located south and east of Old Birch. Street. The review is based on plans received by the City on April 6,.2001.E Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting the project data, acreages, number of lots (46) and density (1.15 units /acre) as contained in the staff report. Staff recommended :approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, and relimin" "l ort. at subject to the four conditions detailed in the staff re p � p j p Mr. Lyden stated homeowners on that street raised questions about the sewer. He noted the other route for the sewer brings it past a lot of wetland area. Mr. Powell stated the applicant petitioned for a feasibility study and the recommendation is to extend from directly west rather than down Old Birch Street due to saving restoration and crossing costs, and wetland impacts. • Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2001 Page 18 Mr. Lyden asked what the dollar figure is between the two routes. Mr. Powell estimated a 50% higher cost. Mr. Lyden asked about the potential for utility connections with an east/west route. Mr. Powell estimated one to two. Chair Schaps asked if there was discussion about closure to the north entrance from Birch Street. Mr. Powell stated that was recommended. Chair Schaps invited the applicant to make comment. Mr. Hill, representing Heritage Development, stated he had nothing to add and offered to answer questions. Eugene Gervais, 890 Old Birch Street, stated there are several residents with recently updated septic systems which were costly so he does not support a north/south utility extension. He stated that the street in front of his house is in better shape than Birch Street and he does not want it disturbed. Gary Foster, 882 Old Birch Street, stated he has many concerns. He stated they are changing the directions of access to make it more difficult:„ He suggested the developer should be charged to install the sewer and leave. it up to the residents if they want to connect. Mr. Foster suggested that is the least the developer' should be required to do. He stated 46 houses times two vehicles per house results';in a lot of traffic and will make access a bottleneck and even more impossible than it is currently. Mr. Foster stated they only have one exit, but the new project is to have`` -two exits, which may help a little. He stated that his sewer system is about 15 ye'a old so he does not plan to connect right now. He stated he has lived there for 25 years and understands that development cannot be stopped, but he believes the resident's;; should get something. Mr. Foster stated he has four ° acres On ,a corer lot by the bend in the road and will want to do something in the future so helloes riot want to be dictated to about what he can and cannot do. He asked ,about the potential impact of this project to his property and expressed concern abouthow their ponding and streets will be taken care of to assure they do not impact his $14e Hank Meyers, 904bld Birch Street, stated he has lived there for 30 years and installed Lii}'v, , many of he septic systems being mentioned. He stated he owns ten acres with little wetlands and vantssthe sewer extended. He asked where the sewer will be when he does something "with his property in five years and if the roads will be impacted. Chair Schaps explained that some of those questions cannot be answered since it is not part of this project. Mr. Powell stated if the pavement is disturbed, it will be replaced at a 7 -ton design. Mr. Meyers asked if the sewer will be available to his property when he wants to develop. • Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2001 Page 19 Amy Roth, 889 Old Birch Street, stated her preference for a north/south sewer route so she has access. She explained she would like to add on to her house but the current ten - year old septic system prevents that from occurring. She stated she believes it is not safe to pull out onto the roadway where the traffic is traveling at 50 miles per hour. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:28 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Lyden stated it appears Mr. Foster's concern about water should be addressed. He noted that the Rice Creek Watershed District gave approval but their concern is rate of runoff, not the amount of runoff. He stated if the ground slopes towards Mr. Foster's property, it could receive flow if the rate is exceeded. Mr. Powell clarified that the Rice Creek Watershed District is very much concerned about water volume and encourages infiltration on every site. He stated they have made significant steps to address that issue. Mr. Lyden stated he would like to see the numbers on the cost versus benefit since some residents are interested in connecting to the sewer system. He noted this requests asks for more MUSA which cannot happen right now since Lino Lakes is already, beyond the 2010 plan for population. Mr. Lyden stated he would have to be convinced,that asking for more MUSA is the right thing for the City. In addition, he isrconcerned that the houses are getting too large for the lots so he would support upholding RIX lot size standards. Mr. Corson asked if a MUSA bank swap is a consideration with this request. Ms. Sherman stated that is correct and the MUSA `allotment would be swapped from the bank. She noted that only eight acres would impact the I IUSA allocation. Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to recommend: denial of the Heritage Development application for MUSA allocation, and was, supported by Mr. Zych. Motion carried 4 -1 -1 (Corson voted nay and Schaps abstained). Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to recommend denial of the Heritage Development application for rezoning, and was suported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 4 -1 -1 (Corson voted nay, and Schaps'Jabstained). Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to recommend denial of the Heritage Development application for prelin inary plat, and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0 -1 (Schaps abstained). I. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Ryan Companies US, Inc. (Target), Lake Drive Staff presented the application by explaining that staff has been working with Ryan Companies, US Inc. on a proposed retail development called Lino Lakes Marketplace located in the northeast quadrant of the Lake Drive/I -35 W. Interchange. The Planning Environmental Memo To: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson CC: Michael Grochala Date: July2, 2001 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations /Saddle Club The Environmental Board reviewed the Saddle Club Plat at the April 25 meeting and • recommended 5 -1 in favor of approval. This is to clarify the built points listed in the previously submitted April 28, 2001 memo. Item 1 The tree preservation plan has been reviewed and the issues brought up at the Environmental Board meeting have been addressed in the plan. Item 2 The Saddle Club Preliminary Plat review consisted of 46 Tots. The 70 figure referred to in the April 28th memo referred not only to the Saddle Club but also other pending/approved subdivisions. Item 3 The recommendation to reduce the size of lots 7,8,and 9 in block 2 was presented for the purpose of increasing the greenway area. This area is predominately wetland and proposed to be platted with a drainage and utility, and conservation easement. This should adequately serve this purpose in a similar manner. • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUESTED: BACKGROUND Cindy Sherman (NAC) June 11, 2001 1s` reading of Ordinance 09 -01 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: MUSA Allocation 1s` reading of Ordinance 10 -01 Rezoning Resolution 01 -77 Preliminary Plat Saddle Club, Old Birch St. 4/5 Vote on Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning. 3/5 Vote Preliminary Plat Heritage Development has submitted an application for comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning, and preliminary plat for a portion of an area included in their application for preliminary plat. The property commonly known as the Saddle Club is located south and east of Old Birch Street. The review is based on plans received by the City on April 6, 2001. ANALYSIS Project Data: Site Total Wetlands Upland Number of Lots Gross Density Net Density (Upland Only) 39.77 acres 15.34 acres 24.43 acres 46 lots 1.15 units /ac 1.88 units /ac Land Use and Zoning: The northern 20 acres (approximately) is zoned R -1. The south 20 acres (approximately) is zoned rural. The application is to rezone the entire parcel to R -1. Additionally, the applicant includes a comprehensive plan amendment to bring the entire property into the MUSA. The existing comprehensive plan designates the northern portion of the parcel for single - family residential development. The draft comprehensive plan designates the entire site for low- density sewered residential development. While the entire parcel is proposed to be platted, the wetland portion of the property is 15.34 acres so the area to be added to the MTJSA does not have a net impact on the amount of land to be serviced. Nonetheless, the MUSA line will have to be moved to include the southern portion of the site in the MUSA. The amount of upland in the southern portion is about eight acres, which would be the amount of MUSA reserve to be allocated to the site. Surrounding Land Use: Greenway: The draft Comprehensive Plan identifies areas for greenways. The intent of the greenway designation is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. This will be accomplished by platting the wetland areas as park. Additionally, staff recommends that wetland markers be placed along the perimeter of the delineated wetlands to identify and protect the space. Lot Sizes and Layout: The R -1 District minimum lot size is 10,800 square feet of upland. All lots meet or exceed this provision with an average lot size of 18,005 upland. The minimum lot width is 80 feet at the 30 -foot front yard setback. All lots except lot 6, Block 2 meets this requirement. The lot width should be met by moving the northerly lot line. Lot 5 is required to be 100' and it is currently shown at 104'. The minimum lot depth is 135 feet. All of the lots meet or exceed this provision. Grading: Fill is proposed on the site to create the house pad areas and roadways. Much of the site is proposed to remain undisturbed and will be encumbered by drainage and utility easement. The grading plan is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Existing Structures: All existing structures shall be removed from the site. Transportation: Access to the property is proposed from Old Birch Street. This requires right - of -way acquisition from an adjacent parcel, which is in process and it is not anticipated to be an issue. A roadway connection is also proposed to Killdeer Drive. This right -of -way acquisition has been completed. There will be modifications to adjacent roadways based upon a feasibility report completed in March. Utilities: Water and sanitary sewer are both proposed to be looped through the property along the proposed roadway alignments. A feasibility study has been completed and the results of the study will be incorporated into the construction plans for the development. Parks and Trails: There is a trail corridor proposed between Lots 18 Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3 and the right -of -way on the northeast corner of the site provides access to the trail corridor platted in the Oaks of Lino. While all of the wetland area is identified as park, only upland areas Saddle Club Page 2 of 4 Comprehensive Plan (Existing) Comprehensive Plan (Draft) Zoning Site Residential Low Density /Sewered Residential R / R -1 North Residential Low Density /Sewered &Unsewered R -1 East Residential Low Density /Sewered Residential R / R -1 South Rural Low Density/Unsewered R West Residential Low Density /Sewered & Unsewered R -1 Greenway: The draft Comprehensive Plan identifies areas for greenways. The intent of the greenway designation is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. This will be accomplished by platting the wetland areas as park. Additionally, staff recommends that wetland markers be placed along the perimeter of the delineated wetlands to identify and protect the space. Lot Sizes and Layout: The R -1 District minimum lot size is 10,800 square feet of upland. All lots meet or exceed this provision with an average lot size of 18,005 upland. The minimum lot width is 80 feet at the 30 -foot front yard setback. All lots except lot 6, Block 2 meets this requirement. The lot width should be met by moving the northerly lot line. Lot 5 is required to be 100' and it is currently shown at 104'. The minimum lot depth is 135 feet. All of the lots meet or exceed this provision. Grading: Fill is proposed on the site to create the house pad areas and roadways. Much of the site is proposed to remain undisturbed and will be encumbered by drainage and utility easement. The grading plan is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Existing Structures: All existing structures shall be removed from the site. Transportation: Access to the property is proposed from Old Birch Street. This requires right - of -way acquisition from an adjacent parcel, which is in process and it is not anticipated to be an issue. A roadway connection is also proposed to Killdeer Drive. This right -of -way acquisition has been completed. There will be modifications to adjacent roadways based upon a feasibility report completed in March. Utilities: Water and sanitary sewer are both proposed to be looped through the property along the proposed roadway alignments. A feasibility study has been completed and the results of the study will be incorporated into the construction plans for the development. Parks and Trails: There is a trail corridor proposed between Lots 18 Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3 and the right -of -way on the northeast corner of the site provides access to the trail corridor platted in the Oaks of Lino. While all of the wetland area is identified as park, only upland areas Saddle Club Page 2 of 4 will be accepted for park dedication. The balance of the dedication will be cash in lieu of land. The amount to be paid will be based upon the rates in effect at the time of final plat. Wetlands: There are 15.34 acres of wetland on the property. Some fill is proposed to accommodate roadway construction. The proposal is to mitigate the fill adjacent to other wetland areas. The wetland delineation and proposed fill are subject to the review and permitting of Rice Creek Watershed District, which oversees the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). It is the City staffs policy to require preliminary approval (tabled with approval for administration action or TWAFAA) from Rice Creek before the City staff recommends approval by the Planning and Zoning Board. This has been completed as of April 25, 2001. Environmental Board: The Environmental Board reviewed the application and they recommended that the tree preservation be better well defined, raised concern regarding 70 houses being platted and relationship to the total lots platted in the community, request to reduce the lot areas in Block 2 so the area could be included in the greenway. Tree Preservation: There are woods identified on the site and much of the tree area is being .preserved outside of the grading area. Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the application and they recommend denial of the application in its entirety. The Board did not provide specific reasons for their action although their discussion included concerns regarding availability of MUSA and provisions for utility service in the area. Staff has outlined two options for Council consideration. Options: A. Approve the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, and preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. Lot 6, Block 2 shall be 80' in width 2. All Engineering issues as outlined in the memo dated May 1, 2001 shall be addressed. 3. Park dedication shall be paid prior to recording the final plat. 4. Right -of -way acquisition shall be completed prior to recording the final plat. 5. Wetland Markers shall be installed along the perimeter of the delineated wetlands. By adoption of the attached resolutions and ordinance OR B. Deny the application based on findings related to the rezoning criteria outlined below: Saddle Club Page 3 of 4 • • 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Recommendation Staff recommended Option 1 to the Planning Commission and continues to support approval of the application with the conditions as outlined. Saddle Club Page 4 of 4 • 10 -01 Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 10-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R, RURAL TO R -1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed rezoning action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan, as the site is guided for residential uses. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for single - family residential uses. Land in the area of the site is already developed with single- family homes or designated for such use. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The accompanying plat proposal meets the zoning and platting requirements contained in City ordinances. Single - family homes and public parks are permitted R -1 uses. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity.._ Utilities can be extended to serve the development and a feasibility study has been completed. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The 46 new homes will not cause negative impacts on the existing roads. Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on March 14, 2001 and continued to May 8, 2001. Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by rezoning from R, Rural, to R -1, Single Family Residential, the following described real estate: INSERT LEGAL Section 4. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Al 1. EST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. • 09 -01 Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 09-01 • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY ALLOCATING 8 ACRES OF MUSA RESERVE TO A PORTION OF THE SADDLE CLUB PLAT The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does hereby ordain: Section 1. The City Council finds that the proposed project meets the City's Interim MUSA Reserve Criteria as follows: 1. The request for MUSA is occurring concurrently with preliminary plat application. 2. The rezoning request is occurring concurrently with the MUSA request. 3. MUSA is adjacent to the site to the north and northeast. 4. The net acreage for the area to be included is 8 acres, and that is the MUSA request. 5. Roadways exist directly adjacent to the site. 6. The City has reviewed the proposal and there is no evidence of negative impacts to the community health, welfare, or general safety. 7. The City has reviewed the proposal and there is no evidence of negative impacts to the environment. The wetland plan was approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. 8. Utilities exist adjacent to the site. 9. The proposed development complies with the City's Infill Policy outlined by Resolution No. 92 -85, because: allocation of MUSA reserve will put the site within the MUSA; the development of the site has been analyzed for impacts on utility and street system costs; the analysis determined that costs will be covered by assessments, that operation and maintenance will not exceed normal costs, and there will be no additional costs. 10. Existing roads are adequate to handle traffic from the 46 new proposed lots. • Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on March 14, 2001 and May 8, 2001. • Section 3. Since the fmdings support the proposal, 8 acres of MUSA reserve shall be allocated to the area included in the southern one half of the Saddle Club plat. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor A1°l'EST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member • and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. 01 -77 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-77 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SADDLE CLUB WHEREAS, the City has received an application for preliminary plat approval for Saddle Club, and WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on March 14, 2001 and continued to May 8, 2001 and WHEREAS, Ordinance 10 -01 rezones the southern 20 acres of the property to R -1 Single Family Residential, and WHEREAS, Ordinance 09 -01 allocates 8 acres of MUSA reserve to the southern portion of the proposed plat, and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the preliminary plat for Saddle Club with the following conditions: 1. Ordinance 10 -01 to rezone the property must be in effect (30 days after publication) before the final plat can be recorded. 2. Ordinance 09 -01 to allocate 8 acres to MUSA reserve must be in effect (30 days after publication) before the final plat can be recorded. 3. Lot 6, Block 2 shall be at least 80' in width 4. All Engineering issues as outlined in the memo dated May 1, 2001 shall be addressed. 5. Park dedication shall be paid prior to recording the fmal plat. 6. Right -of -way acquisition shall be completed prior to recording the final plat. 7. Wetland markers shall be placed around the perimeter of the wetland area. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor A 1°1EST: • Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. JUN -05 -2001 16:46 • Memo CITY OF LINO LAKES 651 982 2499 P.02/02 Environmental To: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson CC: EB Members Date: 4/28/01 Re: April Environmental Board Meeting /Agenda Item Recommendations 4. Saddle Club Preliminary Plat Recommendation of approval of the Preliminary Plat with the following comments: • The Tree Preservation needs to be better well defined. Species were not indicated, just numbers. Note --The Environmental Coordinator has an electronic copy of the Tree Inventory with species indicated. • Special concern for another 70 houses platted, with reference to the "147" units per year figure, and the number of units approved in the last year. • Shrink lots down if possible, in particular Lots in Block 2 so that this area can be included in the greenway. Vote 5 to 1 in favor of approval, Mike Trehus voting against. 5. Town Center/Target/Ryan • Page 2 w E WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLE, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR. SADDLE CLUB PREPARED FOR. HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT INC. CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PROJECT LOCATION CR10 Cedar Lake CR 37 CRI SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS SOIL TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10580 WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55305 I+ SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION 1. COVER 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS- PLAN 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT 4. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN S. UTIUTY PLAN 6. DETAILS 7. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 1 HERM COMPS Ma IRS PURL W(C$CAmw. at RPOR1 ■is PRCYIRW WI w[ OR LOSER w OWLS SUPSILLISLOR 4446 TONT 1 w A OW UO[R4)O PROMS... MAWR uweaR mt uws Of iwt n Of uR.awu oouc- GlR 4,1446 IRAN R(VRY4 RI; MR • -••••-•06; rs? •-...) ,AL. .0,4. • A... • 6166,........4•;6•016.6 I. , MD • l \ \ '4'. 55 SF • taw ..1:. IL"\7 ...,r;...:T.:'• E re. CnAtfiLik• rE,:.1. „........Lir.r. • ••,.• A \ i. / . n . ...c. . • -; ' . "" \L ' •,---- '-'41'''' .i.Alt,„. W77 Asa. \ Wana.• 7......„,' Arie / \ , 0.6.• 'iiirsermrs Oar .ale• • , mums ,-.A..•*" z.rs 'mat Aj • \ a • • Sbe.N RLOCK 1 &rt. 2 a MO INIP N1•••• • fitottok: 4•• • 46 ."'" • 44. • " I Ia. ' • 6661 tt•• -Val( ••■ • fro163 k64616 ••%, ‘ta.,1 •000 4414,4 11.1'724••:1 vs* • • -.•-tArs 60606 ; 8. ..61666. • MY> • "41 6. • • • WETLANDS rtry,\"." • ) ot.• • alaa • ••• 'te • an, -tat • mu, (Ram at)... • • / . v. • 614.116 est • /61661 / •1•7 ha tt4r- BENCHMARK: • 60 Si /666 II •• /„. L. Ina \*'°- Jr' 1,••••• • maw !•••••• ; Ana WETLANDS • Man FENCE. (1••0AST C1AL) • WO, ; •••••• •0*04) • man 41" .14 • fm7, A's • „• .• seam ; 61472 ,••1.••0 •••••••.• lawn • " 8. .4t•'•, • • r' • \ vase AM••••••%. ••••-„,>towe' • - ' • • 1`1'7,__ •• • ... WS, '••••••• 666 , r •Paa .• W7 ?MY ogo A \INA • *Ma 1.11.6116,• 01636 Ittt ...,J66.62..1440,51e0 - • 8. M6.16 F[144 • (NORM DDRAL) • • 16166 ' ,a600■666.16..; , .4; .6•666 • • 1676-4•66..66.6L,‘..k. • 6.6.6 9 vc.71141s 060 -- - 0DTLETT E 6460 t066 %SW 66.61 0661, t6 , • 6116n • 166.3I • • •••■■■ NOD 6666 • 66113 `e,k9 6'6.-66.1611. "1" 66 • 161•61t • ../••••••••,66. et. • 1.4.611 / • ki 7k. -'14' urn. ''"‘ • WETLANDS WETLANDS 0, 62> • • •••••• • 'A. h 'wan • ,WETLAPIDS \.,n. Mat • 16. • 16636 &M. .."•". • 11.16.* • •■■••;,,, 611••• • r"."-Th•-t 440 /61611 0-‘ ••1617Z 11166/3 Agit/ • 3111 ▪ WETLANDS IL • •• "gr. a ...NM AL.1 0660. &Ns a at • sr n SP2 /awn • .1 ••••••A WETLANDS .0. • • A • 0464 '.":•••••4••••••'/ 161•• ••-ik" .4" xas-44•01-. I 13041.118 1 • .‘ 4. 4. WETLANDS • n 0 so TEO 180 00*51 LEGEND 1433 DENOTES COSMO CONTOUR 0 935.5 DENO= CORM SPOT ELEVATION sTZ---5- ODOM DEMO EOM SEWER DORRIS EOSINS WATERMAN. HIVRAMT t GATE WLYE F 54'4' raw."•••••••••••• mats =TM wow,. sou COWES COSTING ME LINE •••••• • DEMO =SIM 1REE - • - • - • - • - DENIMS COSMO WEILAND 110140055 1 50-1 305135 0051500 MICE DENOTES COMING WWII) DENOILS SQL BORING NOTE: SURVEY RORK PERTDMAITO MEMO UM SURVEYING 81 ENZAURINO• 1 8:11-7811,t112 WEILAND ocummoN mom= III MUM ECOSOUNIONS. 1132-545-01112 REVISIONS 1 n al tIfft nV T. N.T r.-f - - sr r gnr1424arj.. u.1 UNEN AND 14 Al A DULY ULTIMO 40E5 40 4. DOWN A10014 V45 0* 1040 PATE 0* 00E3504. I WG STA DOL KG MO 11344 ILMVD Calt SCHOELL & MADSON, INC:\ ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNING SOIL MONO • DMRONNENTAL SEANCES 10540 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SURE 1 NINNETOING, MN 55305 0192) 544-7801 PAW 548-0085 NInaschothwadsonsom OWNER/DEVELOPER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 422 EAST COUNTY ROAD ST PAUL., MN 661-481-0017 DATE: APRIL 6. 2001-, /'PROJECT NAME/SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN EXISTING CONDITIONS is.NN:z s e a,st N 1 n al tIfft nV T. N.T r.-f - - sr r gnr1424arj.. u.1 UNEN AND 14 Al A DULY ULTIMO 40E5 40 4. DOWN A10014 V45 0* 1040 PATE 0* 00E3504. I WG STA DOL KG MO 11344 ILMVD Calt SCHOELL & MADSON, INC:\ ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNING SOIL MONO • DMRONNENTAL SEANCES 10540 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SURE 1 NINNETOING, MN 55305 0192) 544-7801 PAW 548-0085 NInaschothwadsonsom OWNER/DEVELOPER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 422 EAST COUNTY ROAD ST PAUL., MN 661-481-0017 DATE: APRIL 6. 2001-, /'PROJECT NAME/SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN EXISTING CONDITIONS Y 1960 80.0 80.0 ti , \ _7Ia BLOCK 1 -e46--- ;-..,, S88'S0'ro-a ;94 80.0 1307.82 DRAINAGE. UNITY 8 CONSERVATION EASEMENT ?9a -! NCHMARK: A FEET SOUTH OF SOUTHEAST CORNER �oLFEVOUTLOT A. TOP OF WATERAWN PIPE. (ASSUMED FROMSTOPO PLAN 8Y OTHERS) 60.0 4 ROAD OFFSET PRIM R.0.8. 302.9 WETLAN05 y iou \ \ ` ' 1 3--11 1sI ,Aid_ \ 1 / 80.0 s �. 85.4 1 / wry- BLOCK 1 3 Alm LA OUTLOT E 4x.00 3 A 0 BLOCK 3 :0; ` 80.0 210.0 80.0 12 WE\TLANOs 1 PARK 156.3 A /I / ti 407. I/ WETLANDS y b .'' BLOCK 3 9.2 ' • 3351 30409 WETLANDS WETLANDS Y •\ • WETLANDS PARK 1797 PARK / rl \\ WETLANDS / • / WETLANDS / fI) A181308,8'44'O1n98 r 1 \ 1/ 7 / / • • n / _0w/NAOL4U0Lin 5 C0N$FF/A1K94 \ /3a7 �ASO*€NT • 094465E. MTV i CONSEINATON EA50.IEN7 ORA5ACE. UTILITY 67 CONSERVATION EASEMENT 92 1 0 60 120 180 1nQQ7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5E 1/4 OF THE %V 1/4 OF SECIION 28, TOWNSHIP 31, RANDE22; ANDRA cower. LUNNE50TA. LEGEND 447 EWING CONTOUR • - - - IXI9T915 MILANO BOUNDARY - - - - - - PROPOSED DRNWAE 8 U11UTY EASEMENT . - - . - PROPOSED TRAIL EA004714T TYPICAL ESMT. DETAIL TYPICAL SET -BACK DETAIL, (DRAINAGE AND U5LL111T . BLOCK 1 SETBACK LINE REAR LOT UNE LOT DATA LOT 4 4.. 444., -n + 21622.4 0 21622.4 2 126094 0 12000.4 3 131289 0 13125.9 4 15789.8 0 15788.8 5 12661,1 0 11561.1 6 17185.4 2662.2 19847.6 7 2113.7 7241.6 25955.3 8 16219.4 3769,1 199604 9 15447.4 0 15447.4 10 1148+,7 11570.6 23052.3 11 15043.8 113.5 15157,3 12 11243.1 3058.0 14900.9 13 10822.0 5946.0 16619.5 14 18882.5 4093.5 231249 15 17864.8 8779.3 26644.1 16 22004.8 10763,1 327579 TOTAL 253910.2 56567.7 312507.9 BLOCK i LOT pow. simm .ne.. I 15780.3 16701 1450.4 2 29430.0 1960.8 31395.5 3 29042.5 175.2 29216,0 4 20428.5 7605.0 25093.8 5 135563 11929.7 25468.0 6 12478,9 10350.1 22529.0 1 12433,5 76053 20240,0 8 19034.3 14116.9 30751.4 9 16239.7 7724,3 23984,0 10 13303.9 0 13303.9 11 14653.2 89663 53021.5 12 18176.0 7599.7 23775.7 701,41. 210379,9 79571.5 290131.5 BLOCK 2 337 1644r -n.. -nor 1 22645,2 9826,2 32471.4 IIIIMIIIIMINIIMMIIIIIIIME111 INE11111111111MCF11111111111MINITail IBL>•11FMEIMBCEDEfS7 seammtnnumitectuwarra ■E1IIIMMEIMISME7 1111117MMEITNIMMITIIIIIERECINI 10 15496,9 12382.8 27679.7 11 20774.4 3314.6 24089,2 12 18717.6 2968.0 21705.6 13 13817.9 0 1381.9 14 123a6.9 652.9 13489.6 15 74683.6 2909.3 17592.9 Q>•INIEgrellINIET1'1I1m 0�,.1,��1�1 111•Y'.'MV•.1IIT113 AREA TABULATIONS TOTAL SITE AREA : 39.77 ACRE TOTAL LOTS : 46 PROPOSED ROW OF WAY AREA 1 4.33 ACRE AREA WRWN PLATTED 1.011 : 2507 ACRE AVERAGE LOT AREA : 237333 S.F. AVERAGE LOT AREA UPLAND) 1 15005.0 S.F. AVERAGE LOT AREA ) : 57233 S.F. DEN6RY : 0.55 LO9MS /ACRE ('HEREBY wean TINT 1195 NAN. SPECVN 1109. OR REPORT BAS PROPARED 8Y IK OR UNDER WY GREG SWERVI■ON AND 1111T I A. A CUL7 141E4SE1) PROFESSOR., ENGOAFRR UNDER 174E UBS 00 174E STATE DE NW4K5 740 DOUG SiAI(1~� MR t:•,.,: 1 RIO. Nl 19584 RLVKBfe Fro. 17417 / ■ SCHOELL $ MADSON, INC. OWNER /DEVELOPER ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS , PLANNING SOIL 1E31140 • ENVIRONMENTAL SEANCES 10580 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SURE 1 MINNETONIU, MN 55.305 (952) 346 -7601 FAX: 548 -9055 AKA 4614e.I9mA.nn,w,n HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 422 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN 861. 481 -0017 PROJECT NAME /SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN DIM IMIMADV DE AT s WETLAD ALTER. .154 SOFT. ?003 ACRES 100 YR 141.0895.0 (AS PER TVA STUDY) ELOC,1 seavo•Fr2 nor. • 2 0RAOAGE, UTILITY k CONSERVATION .EASEMENT ROAD OFFSET W1714114 R.O.W. e., WETLAND ALTER 3403 SOFT. 08 ACRES REMANDS • 81.0 SURMOUNTABLE CURD ) k CUTTER B ;+ Bc.�ra M. 590 WETLAND 81NFER 13085 SOFT. / 4fi_Lt►�Ar V4 1 . ,� .'Air • AV5:1141 �iPETARD PETARD SINTER r� 2 I • DRAINAGE. UTR.Y k CONSERVATION EASEMENT WERMD BUFFER 7309 50.01. 05484608, nun, k CONSERVATION EASEMENT WETLAND BUFFER 7385 SCUT. MITIGATION 171 5017. 0.33 PARK WETLANDS ••447 I I \ 7, \ • «A3W A r 1 ANA i4n•• BLA('�! Nem NA:r. REDO MR•Y92.1 141.0891 A ORAMAGE, U115Y k CONSERVATION 00500DNT WETLANDS WETLANDS r: 50 REVISIONS 2 -21 -01 Rf ( PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL 4 -6 -01 RE CRY k WATERSHED REVISIONS 11R11ERT CERTIFY INN DRS PUN. SPE0IICATON. CR REPORT WAS PREPARED 90 90 OR UNDER WY ERECT SUPER RIO', 800 NWT I AM A DUL1 LICENSED PROFESSION. ENIIN¢f 06007 TIC 4N'1 Of ME STATE Of WNNE301A DOUG STAIR 50m Y6.a% N0. N0.01515 REWORD VP PARK 1308.98 N8r4400r11 •°' i ) WETLANDS ..11 • �QO4OVE0000 WETLANDS / MERINOS -8WDR 91.3 ('»89N+ c� RICH fl4- INEETRAT10Fi 1580 SF VAGUE 1• FALL WTN 1' GRANULAR 5089 4. i TT . \'`Is . ` ueF? B I ✓ sI0? $,Fv� 1 # OUTLOT E -09: -- 9981 :ox LEGEND DORM CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PERCENT Or GRADE DRNNAOE ARROW COSTING STORM 5000.9 « B PROPOSED STORM SEWER ELO 00000000000000 EROSION CONTROL 547 FENCE x981.3 x 908.3 932.0 924 0 wo SE 58 -1 WPM SiM4 MOB Yi PROPOSED SPOT 0100.7ON COSTING SPOT E1LVATION WETLAND ALTERA7ON 9611AW MITIGATION WETLAND ENINNCEMENT ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HDIEE PAD WIN GRADE ELEVATIONS WAUOUT SPLIT ENTRY SOIL BORING LOCATION 08 319113 SRI WETLAND MITIGATION TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION n 0 00 120 180 WETLAND NOTES TOTAL WETLAND ALTERATION • 27225 5F. TOTAL MITIGATION REDD. • 42450 5F. TOTAL WETLAND MREATION - 21242 5F. PUBLIC VALUE CRONE (BUFFER) - 28208 SF. (.75 x 39051 Sr. - 29281 SA) TOTAL WETLAND 141110.101014 - 50030 S.F. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE NSTAUED PRIOR TO C0167RUCION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 5004050 BASTES PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. S THE CONTRACTOR AWL GRADE STE AND MALL URE11F5. 4 CONTRACTOR AWL MULL COCA MIN EROSION CONTROL 5. WITHIN TWO EMS Of 511E GRADNO, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE S1ABEREO WITH SEED. 580 OR ROCK 818. SEEDND HALL BE 84 ACCORDANCE WITH AND07 SPEC. 2575. RED MIXTURE SHALL BE MNDOT MIXTURE 500. ALL MUCH SHALL 30 179E 1 AND 5NAL1. BE DISC ANCHORED. TERMED SHALL BE 10 -10.10 COMMERCML GRADE 8EETBD THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MN00T 3587 MO SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE Of 200 /185. PER ACRE. 508 HALL MEET DK REQUIREMENTS Of ANOOT 3578. ALL AREAS 70 BE SODDED OR SEEDED. AAA. BE COMM 8171 MINIMUM of FOUR RICKS 07 TOPSOIL IL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SRN/ BE INSTALLED A140 141WTANED N ACCORDANCE 97754 CRY, WATERSHED DISTRICT AHD LINHESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL (WOES) PEMNRS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR AWL MO RAN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. INCLUDING THE REMOVAL Of ACCUMULATED SAT N FRONT Of SILT FENCES. DINING DIE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 8. ANY EXCESS SEWER 84 PROPOSED SUNS SWCL BE RESO.ED BY THE CONTRACTOR 9. 1105800E ALE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WIER YECETATON S ESTABLISHED. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SIM L REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EX0TIN0 STREETS AND PAVED AREAS. 11. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE TIE CONTRACTOR MALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK 70 ALL CONSTRUCTOR MEAS. 12. SWEEP ADJACENT STREET N ACCORDANCE 101111 CITY REQUIREMENTS Mixture 25A Modified (265) Prairie Meadow & Streambanks Common Ne * •00 MUM x M Mb 9AI4•b., ML M.f•P•E -. P,-0 5.0 Or* °momone Menem* a -r9..b 0.1 0-..4.4. 4400, 4Nno-1. 55 Naw S 8 0.1- ▪ 1.04,04 0.• 0r•m, NAM. Snows d.b S.0 TAN., MO-04 5.__ n maw. 54 VA* ,a.. 4.0., DV.4. 040400*0 L0 WW 7n. 18059 Den-. A0010. IA A.-P...4 - Emee1-A•. 00*4m-n 8.. I0 •- -- [..R -A,- •Od•b•, 03 Woke 0.S. -4 00.08 rani OS Ammo 04.4. Wm %RAP. Wbb 0.3 140 -414.r Able... 448.41•14. 0.7 180.4. 1444 0.4 110h N.••eb.l. 0.4 LYNN 9141514 O1 L.W. N440.. 10.4 4410e A.4+ 0.1 44. OMm-. 0.8 HA 310 .• t0. V4 1100 O 040•4134 We AS Si.9 ■••4 -- 03 9_1100 43840e 03 5440410 ..m4Ne4 0.2 S.V+N..o .Aw 5.0 88.019 5500. 35 9-.e. I-N.. 0.5 1144044 hchatete w_. 04 0.n.. al 25404 -•. 0.4 700E 100.0 94--'0 WN 040.. 42090s 70 00000. Gnat M. 80•4 RR rook 9-m• N.Ibt 0.•40 14.4 -P.m • R.S••e %Ace 044 Maya. ITN S.N. -.IM 5004•0 ON. W98 WNW. M woo 441-100,84 NARentaa 440. ••• SN 1 0•... 04-1 1..1 GUM-. AN•e*eo 0ob 30 W9 /.a. (33 88/.1• 0- 0MIMANs*...P /Gil• ..4• M•. Ragmen • 14•4A of 34 H M 64,04. D44•148.4 Mr u.. MO& 904 0.4 1- .eelm4 ..INNM. 44404104 4M.4444., 144.. P.M 9..9...Ymf..9 ..A 4.U49 0. .2 Ry 04.91 mNN. 0. ..e -.n 00 004 Sm.• 04, 0 4417 .■• lo we Foam. AM .b 11-ry M IM.. mock. r•.0n 04-44r400001 CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ENGINEER'S WERAND SPECIALIST PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION Of MITIGATION AREAS AT: (952) 548 -7601 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC .N / OWNER /DEVELOPER MINERS • SURVEYORS • PUNNING SOB TESTING • EMARONMENT4L SERVICES 10580 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SURE 1 MNNETONKA, MN 55305 (952) 546 -7801 077 548 -9065 WW..1WW.INrwd,GR,0 ,5 I HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 422 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN 651- 481.0017 11ATF• APRIL R 0nn1 0.) PROJECT NAME /SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 00 g�: iveD PPR 0 8 L001 CTT Of NE 1 o TRUNK SANITARY SEWER 17 OTHERS NN BY OTHERS I58/..683.45 8[1114.10".1 1307.82 ELOCK 0 3 CONNECT r OIP CL52 WM 1320' TO CRY CONNECTION 25435 -r 50875 00.45 195EF =S SOR35 00.49 11 881.902.8 RN4592.3 10 11 ROM -9010 MY -888.3 IGSLF -r S8R35 00.4 1 BLOCK 3 1)RP WISP A 1861.897.5 5840.4594.3 902.4 -664.6 2 153L7 -8'. 50835 00.45 FR.IRATHON \181 55 SUBCU0 1' 553 WITH 1• MIKAM SONS . 99 RN -901.5 RN -681.5 1021J-r .5DR35 00.775 RN -907.3 9N4698.5 RIM.6043 *M' -890.7 b 6- 2460F -13' 5035 00.45 BLOCK 3 PARK V R1M -903.2 958 -691.7 RGWD NML.892.1 AIWP RASP 4 *55.694.3 15580.691.5 \ 1981F -r 50935 ROAR I6 64 9161.903.5 *114693.5 9. PARK u PARK • INFILTRATION 9635_ 1560 SF MCA 1' FILL WITH i• GRAMMAR SOBS 1308.98 J 144 orr 19035-8 SOR35 00.49 ASPEN LA. OUTLOT E EYTEND (1208580. SAN 44tF -• 50835 00.49 R 01.5 958 -891.5 T1 0 E0 120 180 5 DIP WATEBµMN r SAN SEWfA LEGEND PROPOSED STORY SEWER 0611N0 WA1ERW4N PROPOSED WATERNVN SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER • -li PROPOSED HYDRANT W/ VALVE 1•--40 PROPOSED 0.1E VALVE CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. REM TO 19067 77 slit PUN FOR BUILDING AND PARKING LAYOUT, DRENSONS. AND LOCATORS. 2. THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR 5MAU. MERRY 101E LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING PPE SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING SERVCE CONNECTIONS 3. ALL PPE- CONNECTONS 1O EK6TNG mums STRUCTURES SNAIL BE 'KOR -N -SEAL' OR DIY APPROVED MUM- FOR CONCRETE RUCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES, 00360007 AN OPENING EQUAL 1D THE PPE SIZE GROUT AROUND PPE TO CLOSE 05(05 O ANO 6EPAIR STRUCTURE TO CRY 675& 0640007. THE C 455467OR SMALL VERFY TYPE DE CONNECTIN *TN CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ANO COORDINATE ANY REQUIRED CITY 06lNFECTKIN6 NEEDED FOR CRY ACCEPTANCE 4. STREET RESTORATION REOUEEMENTS. 1 -1/7 BRIAANOLA WEAR COURSE 3-1/7 iRNWgU6 BASE COURSE r a. 5 owl (1009 CRUSHED UMESIDNE) COMPACTED SWUM Ally TRENCH BACK FLL 5. PRI05 TO 113171tY CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR MU. FIELD VERIFY [215010. MTV =PONS AND RNER75. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANS AND FIELD CONDOUNS SMALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER N 400841ELY. WARNING THE CONTRACTOR PALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC MUM'S FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNOEIIGROPP PONES CARTS, COMOURS. riots. 1MAn1DE5. VALVES, OR OTHER BURRO STRUCTURES BEFORE OGE7N0. HE 51A11 REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED OUNNO CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. REVISIONS DA 2-12 -01 RE PRELIMINARY PLAN SVBSITFµ 4-5 -01 RE CITY R WATERSHED EVASIONS oHERDtt ARMY THAT INS PLAN SPC000?10N. OR ` REPORT WAS PREPARED 9Y ME OR INARR MY DIRER SsPENNSION AND NNE AM • 04.L1. LICENSED PRO,ES40wt [NOAREEN UNDER 05 THE SATE of MINNESOTA 00U D ST G 00. ISSN �RMry(p N; 0017 SCHOELL & MADSON, ENGINEERS R SURVEYORS , RLNNNO SOIL n0000 • ENVIRONMENTAL 5ERNCES 10580 WAYZA7A BOULEVARD. 5007E 1 8155(1ONKA, MN 55305 (952) 546 -7801 , F43 : 548 -9065 W.W.*0ho*4nlodson.ewn OWNER /DEVELOPER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 422 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN 681. 481.0017 PROJECT NAME /SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN DATE: APRIL 6. 2001 J __ APR 0 6 0001 1;:(Y OF LINO LAKES • 4/23/97 _,T31 I -SILT FENCE SI4ALL CONFORM TO J� 146005 3860. TYPE 8. - FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS OR AS OIRECIEO BY ENGINEER. .i:L( C:ICE' STANDARD DRAWING N0. E01 R/W VARIES 18' VARIES ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1-47-IT, REM: 4-08 aas 15' VARIES TOPSOIL & 50D (8T OTHERS) NAL. SLOPE 3:1 AUN. SLOPE 2.O% 22 Ox —� R/W 1 '«ljjv 042 CONC. CURD & 1 GUTTE 1S -2350 TYPE LV 4 BIT. WEARING COURSE TACK COAT 2.-2350 TYPE IN 2 OR 3 BIT. NON— WEARING COURSE 5 AGGREGATE BASE. CL 5 (PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE) 24' SELECT GRANULAR BORROW -(p; CAL EC' ON (URBAN STREET /PERMANENT SECTION) 1301 1 IL MLR EMANATE BOTTOM 2' FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT STORAGE TYPICAL BASIN GRADING GO -19 OCR 2 -12 -01 0 -6-01 REVISIONS BY REVISION OF PREUMINART PUN SUBMITTAL Rf CITY & WATERSHED RENSIONS *EMT CERNFV TNT 1613 PUN. 5KCRCATON, OR \ REPORT WAS PREPARED BY 46 OR 108063 IY OPEC1 509(956109 ANG TINT 1 AM A INA? UICOSSCO PIIC$CSSCNN, EWPNfEA 0El1 THE ...94s1 06 TIE STAR of 1.1W1E50Iw 0000 STALL DATE /".'45 REC. N0. 19544 SCHOELL A MADSON, INC. OWNER /DEVELOPER ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNING SOIL 1E51N0 • ENVIROMNENTAL SERVICES 10360 WAYZATA BWLEVARO. SUITE 1 MINNETONKA. MN 555303 (952) 546 -7601 Mk 346 -9065 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 450 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN PROJECT NAME /SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN •F. 0000o gs,05431 O ° '� BLOCK 3 O t2Tf000-D 0 PARK ll !III I ,)0 C) lY9 D�:�'T"4�r II ;I PARK PARK /I ,3OB.J8 f v i ASPEN 1 OUTLC n 0 E0 120 160 LEGEND O DENOTES TREE TO 6E SAVED • DENOTES2 TREE TO BE REMOVED 000( DENOTES SILT FENCE/ 15115 OF CONSTRUCTION IORREIOB CONSTRUCTION NOTES; 1, PUCE SILT FENCE PROTECI01 AT THE IMPURE OF TREES DESIGNATED TO RDHIN. FOR THOSE ASSOCIATED WIN THE 15175 00 CONSTRUCTION WCESIME ANO PROTECT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. TIM MVO Number rello.inp debre.iellen denotes e.t6rloled diameter b Inche., three feel above 50.4.E lent. The seeone number (E a,y) detentes 1M number of trnks of awl location 1 denotes a decd tree). Number wing throbs denotes it's diameter In feet. OOenales ds0Muous tree. CD Denote* .Mud * Denotes coniferous tree. M/• Denote. tree line. A Denote. Ash AV Denotes Arbor Woo 80 Denotes Bala,. Fr. BA Denotes Boa.oad BI Donate 6001 BE Donates Bog Elder BR Denotes Butternut BU Denotes Buell CA Denotes Cat0po (6 D.86. - Cherry CM Denotes Cotton/oaf Denote. Deposer! E EL 0.04•11 4(0, FR Denotes FnA ON Denotes G.4(00 N Denote. IlxWrry NC Denotes Hone Chestnut IR Denotes Ironwood 441 Donates .luN+.r KC Donates I(.h4alry Carte. U Denotes Ube l0 Donates Laa..l N -Denotes M.5. NP Denotes Mugs PM. O Denotes Oak Pt Denotes Pan PO Orates Paper RO Denotes knobs OE.. SIT Denotes Sins, Maple SP Denotes Sanaa 70 Denotes Tree (Heldman It Denotes Tree Congr.en WA Denotes Beirut WI Denote. Welker KATE 6r REVISIONS 2 -12 -01 AP PRELIMINARY PLAN $UBLIITTAL -B -01 AF CITY k WATERSHED REVISION$ I(1 1 4(11(0! L'URFY MAT DAS PIA1. SPECa1CATCN CM ` REPORT WAS PREPAAED Br NE OP HONOR IR Celt., SUPEMISCet AMO 11M1 I AlA A WLr LIC00040 MO0[SLC6NL 1.477E VNC(B 1NE COWS Or NC 51011 DF MR1NC50tA. DOW 6i 1 641C e/ �" 6(0. N0. I me \ R(nEWro ere OAR SCHOELL & MADSON, INC� ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PUNNING SOK TESTING a ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 1 MINNETONKA, MN 53305 (952) 546 -7601 4AX: 546 -9065 wW.achoellmodsan.wm OWNER /DEVELOPER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 422 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN 681- 481.0017 Example; O BE0.2 WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC URURES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, VALVES. BURIED STRUCTURES DIGGING NE SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCT/0N AT NO COST TO OWNER. J PROJECT NAME /SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN TREE PRESERVATION PLAN iEn �fPPR D620BI .:t0OFLIt10Lp.K!S 1 • To: Mayor John Bergeson City of Lino Lakes Re: Saddle Club Development July 9, 2001 Attached is a petition to vote no on the Saddle Club property development preliminary plat. The residents of our neighborhood believe we were misled about the development plan. Right now we have a very nice, quiet, safe neighborhood and we would like to see it stay that way. We have real safety and traffic concerns if the Saddle Club development plan is approved connecting it to our neighborhood as the plan is before you now. It appears no real traffic impact study was performed for this project, only some estimates. We are not against development of the Saddle Club property, but feel that there are alternatives to connecting it to our neighborhood. Had we been afforded the opportunity we would have attended a Wednesday workshop session or a Monday council meeting to discuss the issues. However, if a vote is to be taken on the plan as it is today, we ask that you vote against it. • cc: Council Member Donna Carlson Council Member Caroline Dahl Council Member Jeffery O'Donnell Council Member Jeff Reinert City Administrator Linda Waite Smith • j ichael P `/ e 1047 Aspen LN Lino Lakes • • • ad '> aF4 I• >45c2 ° � cn cd w 0 o CA 0 C CUT) dp cn E 41 '2 c, V 'O O O� y V 0 4 cd w, cn 0 � eg On. � "0 . i 3 a N to t = o c l I. 41+ cd .2 = a ae = M = v v 70 a. p I) p O 0 .. cd C' V t GEC � ' ) CO 0 b 0 r/) A C.) 0 — 0 y L = C 'C ° 0. �t =moo 14 CA I0a) °' i > i A �o —. a c c cn 0 cn ma x°'° 0 o .4 U -0 cn o ° a) • cn = N y 1. - 0 - ° 0 › 0 O U A�N�° Children ......„ , N ,..„,, Address , i l� ti --,), .G J - - 1 J ... j — ! � I , L r - J , .)' Is '�,i ; ,,,, \ '- _ ../. .....„7._ N \ V k -, ,,......, ,..-. ...._, ___. ,: •—i V C� j Name - paint and sign ,,- S • k....) r-' •; .—, '-/- • • • al g ti 6 ti on > O 0 c. • y A lb" o' cn Z ti -8 . az 22 ;31 . C) c' cd > 0. ct O > = 1-1 td O U 0 8 "45— cad O E 0 "CS «0+ 0) -g 4., —O O v) 0 = 0.7-.). ▪ A M O el b �O �O ) U Q = -d 0 . Cd 50E0) 0.... IS 0 49 a Al C6 . 0 Cn ca et O a U ��o 3 0 o ra cu= .008 a' u. ° _o w = o o a3 Q' V ��� �''ai aoE 0 v�5� A 0 .� 5. a) 0 1-3 '> at o 8 tn CI s. Children .k g) Address W 4 4. ti _ ' J It i . Name — print and sign k ) \-- \-,, n --) 5 .-- -(‘_,, ....., .., g , ( c 0 ,i, _? ._. , _)__ c. \t" � _>... • • • Children I % (1 (.'' N i\n, (y) (?,C C 0 r\N, I J I Address --,:„,.. _:> 7-; ,I < C ,e-' ∎t `vim 1 'v nc f t� v Name — print anc4_sigi ,, - ---.... ` -may 4 . Alb, IVA' \ sr 7" .---.‘" ,-..,''' vi F.... v ` Y �' , c-, -S Children I 7-- \\) (i Address c,---- v ,----- b50- &iackc U(K car. Sc \-...„ • -N 1 ..„ Name — print and sign 1 1�J- JC. ______ v —777 T7Y/ -77 Wer-t « of /y) ---) a � G N_-- 4. , ' 4 1 \ (N.,..,,,i y \r--i \,t N U ' T' 1 �- ? ;" — C'l .-, •' .-i 'all 4 d . ����" 1 • • • c v Address Ct� - v V J .1 ,,, a • I. �, Li J V.\f � J r- ti ---1 *-c- C 4.) _ A--") -. t_ L' \-.D ��v► �'5���. Name — print and sign 1 ' 5 A 1 \ 1 e c,. ' V ,___1/ i � Rnk'hLi RTC( eS .1-27(4,TYA. , ± N �. J As Address vi w 9 v Z Q N )og3 As,90N Lair. I'7'/ J\ c OFt_--) `N k s' v. z 7;' "'t Q, C l .4 f -G L._ (1) L_ • PUBLIC NOTICE Notice is hereby given, that the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Lino Lakes will hold a public hearing on TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2001 (changed from February 14, 2001) at 6:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota., W I.U:asIder tha following: Molin Concrete, 415 Lilac Street, Amended Conditional Use Permit to remove condition # 11 c. Strobe lights replace truck back-up beepers during nighttime hours (6:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.) Land Holding Group, north/west corner of 12th Street & Holly Drive, preliminary plat for thirteen (13) single family lots • Ryan Companies US, Inc., north/east corner of I -35 W and Lake Drive, shopping center development to include Target SuperStore, PDO-Rezone, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review Att" Heritage Development, Old Birch Street — Saddle Club Property, preliminary plat for approximately 40 single family lots A sign language or foreign language translator may be requested by contacting City Hall a minimum of 48 hours prior to the hearing. Anyone wishing to be heard regarding these items will be given the opportunity at that time. For further information regarding the above mentioned items, contact May Kay Wyland at 651 -982 -2426. er1 Herrin n —�.7 u�y� p o o_pa o� ��••� • `� �m Enne -7 �:c�i�itii�: ■I�a �n ��. o nn �. �pLQ4Q� CID ...,:gbt ooz c . 1:3,N1 l,j VOf me' \%77 w V up o VA d*: u 4V a wk naniiaouoTIEMncGer�Qi SAO. r+ ►. , O_:� %� alt OGIo^cccocriCI:::I , °o© ch• .70 ';de.l� .. 1DC�Q:tas I L __L_ 11312CTIN 1 14'=x- Y C • it 1 / ' L.0 'L;GL 'hIL L:�GLC44GL'LC :;;;;F;FII rrrrrrrrrurrr; on mini rr:ram L i N LLL:�GLL.L::LL . :�Jrrrrrrrrrrrrrr G 1 r.: c:= :�:.;F iii 1i iiii Iii !I 11 :I lam- 0 7 0 u L�� /L KAr .1 AMIlli w sy n. irtitimr-4-11* 1 ,-„,...,..4.":74•41 in1 1 -4.---imblIswim- vg„,,I=WO . .f,trzhmaiU /(AtititiV .. .li ---Niv-- 0 1 d0 Ot� 0 Ut1- e IAA• t� 1. • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUESTED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 7 -B Daniel Licht (NAC) July 9, 2001 Resolution 01 -91 Preliminary Plat Highland Meadows 3rd Addition 3/5 Vote TSM Development, Inc.has submitted an application for a preliminary plat entitled Highland Meadows 3rd Addition. The subject site is located south of Main Street and west of Lake Drive. The property is planned for low density residential uses and is zoned R -1/PDO and R -1 Districts. The proposed preliminary plat is a re -plat of a portion of Highland Meadows 2nd Addition and incorporates an additional 25 acres as part of the project. The Highland Meadows 2nd Addition included both single family and townhouse dwelling units in a subdivision based on coving design principals. The present application includes only single family residential lots. The following analysis is based upon a review of the following plans revised as of June 19, 2001: Preliminary Plat Preliminary Grading Plan Preliminary Utility Plan Tree Preservation Plan ANALYSIS Erosion Control Plan Existing Drainage Map Proposed Drainage Map Details and Notes Project Data: Site Total 33.39 acres Wetlands 0.74 acres Upland 32.65 acres Right -of -Way 6.53 acres Outlots 0.94 Number of Lots 70 lots Gross Density 2.09 units /ac Net Density (Upland Only) 2.14 units /ac Land Use and Zoning. The subject site is guided for single family residential uses by the current and draft Comprehensive Plan (1 -3 du/ac.) and it is included within the current MUSA. • Consistent with the land use plan, the subject site is zoned PDO/R -1 and R -1 District. The PDO Zoning was applied to the site to facilitate a previous subdivision concept based on coving • design principals with flexibility on front yard setback standards. No such flexibility is being processed as part of this subdivision design. Single family lots and uses are a permitted use of these Districts. • • The following are surrounding land uses. The proposed subdivision is anticipated to be compatible with existing and planned uses in the area. Access. Access to the subdivision is provided via Marilyn Drive from the south and Arlo Lane from the west. Traffic from this neighborhood must use these routes to reach collector or arterial streets due to access limitations onto Main Street to the north. Local streets within the preliminary plat have been designed with a 60 foot right -of -way, consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance. There are three cul -de -sacs within the project, necessitated by existing development and wetlands. The cul -de -sacs have a 60 foot radius as required. Blocks and Lots. The subdivision includes 70 single family lots with an average size of 16,150 square feet within five blocks. The subdivision Ordinance limits block length to not more than 1,500 feet. The lengths of Blocks 1 and 2 exceed 1,500 feet, due to existing development, wetland and drainage areas, and limitations on access to Main Street. The R -1 District minimum lot size is 10,800 square feet of buildable land. The lots have been modified to provide for a minimum of 10,800 of upland per lot. Lots within the R -1 District must also have a minimum width of 80 feet (100 feet for corner lots) and minimum depth of 135 feet (145 feet for double frontage lots). All of the lots meet or exceed these provisions. Existing Structures. There are four existing single family dwellings within the project area. The submitted plans do not identify those that are to remain or those that may be removed. The proposed subdivision design has been laid out such that each dwelling would be located on an individual lot within required setbacks. There is a detached accessory building in the area of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 that must be removed as it overlays lot lines and encroaches into the right - of -way. Natural Features. The subject site includes several large stands of trees throughout the property. A tree preservation plan has been submitted that indicates trees to be protected and those to be removed as part of the development. Trees to be preserved are a large stand in the Highland Meadows 3rd Page 2 of 4 Comprehensive Plan (Existing) Comprehensive Plan (Draft) Zoning Site Single Family Residential Low Density/Residential PDO / R -1 and R -1 North Single Family Residential Low Density/Residential R -1 East Single Family Residential Low Density/Residential R -1 South Single Family Residential Low Density/Residential R -1 West Single Family Residential Low Density/Residential R Access. Access to the subdivision is provided via Marilyn Drive from the south and Arlo Lane from the west. Traffic from this neighborhood must use these routes to reach collector or arterial streets due to access limitations onto Main Street to the north. Local streets within the preliminary plat have been designed with a 60 foot right -of -way, consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance. There are three cul -de -sacs within the project, necessitated by existing development and wetlands. The cul -de -sacs have a 60 foot radius as required. Blocks and Lots. The subdivision includes 70 single family lots with an average size of 16,150 square feet within five blocks. The subdivision Ordinance limits block length to not more than 1,500 feet. The lengths of Blocks 1 and 2 exceed 1,500 feet, due to existing development, wetland and drainage areas, and limitations on access to Main Street. The R -1 District minimum lot size is 10,800 square feet of buildable land. The lots have been modified to provide for a minimum of 10,800 of upland per lot. Lots within the R -1 District must also have a minimum width of 80 feet (100 feet for corner lots) and minimum depth of 135 feet (145 feet for double frontage lots). All of the lots meet or exceed these provisions. Existing Structures. There are four existing single family dwellings within the project area. The submitted plans do not identify those that are to remain or those that may be removed. The proposed subdivision design has been laid out such that each dwelling would be located on an individual lot within required setbacks. There is a detached accessory building in the area of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 that must be removed as it overlays lot lines and encroaches into the right - of -way. Natural Features. The subject site includes several large stands of trees throughout the property. A tree preservation plan has been submitted that indicates trees to be protected and those to be removed as part of the development. Trees to be preserved are a large stand in the Highland Meadows 3rd Page 2 of 4 • • • southwest corner, a stand in the northeast corner and a small stand in the northwest corner of the property. All other significant trees are to be removed from the central areas of the property as part of the grading plan and development of the site. The existing conditions sheet and grading plan identify a 0.74 acre wetland in the center of Block 2. This wetland area is not to be disturbed as part of development of this project. The wetland will be included within a drainage and utility easement that also covers drainage ponds adjacent to the wetland. Grading. The applicant has submitted grading and drainage plans for the proposed subdivision. The grading plan is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Parks and Trails. Outlots A and D are proposed to be dedicated as partial satisfaction of park land requirements. Outlot A provides a desired trail corridor from Main Street to the neighborhood. Connections to the park abutting the southwest corner of this parcel will be provided over the local streets. Outlot D is land dedicated to add to the existing park. The amount of the land required to be dedicated is 10 percent of the gross area of the plat or 3.37 acres. An additional amount of land must also be dedicated to offset the loss of existing parkland caused by the extension of Arlo Lane to serve the plat. The area of Outlots A and D is 0.72 acres, from which the replacement park land must be subtracted. The balance of required park dedication will be required to be satisfied in the form of a cash fee in lieu of and based upon the formula outlined in the Subdivision Ordinance. Outlots. The preliminary plat includes Outlots B and C, in addition to those being provided for park dedication purposes. Outlot B is a parcel of land fronting Street A that is intended to provide access to a land locked parcel to the south east. This land locked parcel is also intended to have frontage to 79`' Street via a reserve strip that was to be dedicated to the City. Staff will need to follow up on resolution of this matter. Outlot C is a 0.07 acre parcel of land that abuts the expanded park. The outlot is being conveyed to the abutting property to the east in order to create a buffer between that lot and the park land. Utilities. Water and sanitary sewer are both proposed to be provided to serve the single family uses. Sanitary sewer and water service are shown within the rights -of -way. Storm sewer facilities are also shown on the plan. Easements have been provided at the perimeter of each lot and over all drainage facilities. All utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Environmental Board. Comments from the Environmental Board have been received and are attached. Highland Meadows 3rd Page 3 of 4 0 RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this request and they recommended approval of the application subject to the following conditions: 1. The preliminary plat is revised to align Street A and Street D, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 2. The preliminary plat is revised such that all lots have 10,800 square feet of buildable area, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Any existing structure not located on a proposed lot within required setbacks is to be removed at the time of final plat approval. 4. All grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. Outlots A and D, minus the area of land necessary to replace existing park land lost with extension of Arlo Lane, are dedicated in partial satisfaction of park dedication requirements. The balance of required parkland dedication will be provided in the form of cash fee in lieu of land as prescribed by the Subdivision Ordinance. 6. Outlots B and C are conveyed to the appropriate landowners for access and a buffer strip, respectively. 7. The streets shall be allowed to be constructed with a 28 -foot width. Since Commission review revised plans have been submitted and conditions 1 and 2 have been IIIsatisfied. The attached resolution does not include these two conditions. • Highland Meadows 3rd Page 4 of 4 • 01 -91 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-91 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HIGHLAND MEADOWS 3rd ADDITION WHEREAS, the City has received an application for preliminary plat approval for Highland Meadows 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on June 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the preliminary plat for Highland Meadows 3rd Addition with the following conditions: 1. Any existing structure not located on a proposed lot within required setbacks is to be removed at the time of final plat approval. 2. All grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. Outlots A and D, minus the area of land necessary to replace existing park land lost with extension of Arlo Lane, are dedicated in partial satisfaction of park dedication requirements. The balance of required parkland dedication will be provided in the form of cash fee in lieu of land as prescribed by the Subdivision Ordinance. 4. Outlots B and C are conveyed to the appropriate landowners for access and a buffer strip, respectively. 5. Comments of other Commissions and City Staff. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk day of 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor • The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • • • • • Environmental Board Comments Highland Meadows West 3rd Addition, Preliminary Plat The Environmental Board made the following comments: • Tree Preservation Plan numbered, no species indicated. The Environmental Board requested a complete inventory. • The Tree Preservation Plan is a Tree Removal Plan. There is nothing the developer is proposing to save that is of any value. • There is no conservation consideration to this subdivision. • Historic oak savanna and oak woodlands can be preserved by building a different type of house in areas where oak savanna and woodlands exist. Walkouts, from a conservation consideration, are inappropriate. zr -11A11111 31111 Si raft t !�P es��si�, _ k®®lI®Uiis 12,101.1c., amIntannorm 1II'i'IIlluI';iiD - Mal MIL. SITE HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST 3RD ADDITION MAIN STREET -C.R. 14 HWY 49 SITE MAP (NO SCALE) LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAT EXHIBITS FOR TSM DEVELOPMENT 222 MONROE STREET, ANOKA, MN 55303 PHONE: (763) 576 -9121 FAX: (763) 576 -9122 SCALE IN FEET 100 200 300 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 6. 9. 10. 11. 1 inch : 100 feet RECEIVED MAY 1 1 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES SHEET INDEX TITLE SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS PRELIMINARY PLAT PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PLAN TREE PRESERVATION PLAN TREE PRESERVATION PLAN EROSION CONTROL PLAN EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP DETAILS & NOTES a E z A A N O] v 3r 4 TNT cn OD U Obi • $ W 0 i a *fts,„ 1--I DRAWN BY TDL DATE 02/12/01 REVISIONS wna/s r[v. LOTS & Pd RCM CAD FILE 20196TS PROJECT NO. 20196 FILE NO. DRAWER SHEET 1 OF 11 COUNTY ROAD 14 EX MEh.MND 9,645 SF..13.22 w i it EM. METANO 32,436 51..0.14 6C L_L_J L_. MAR DON ACRES HIGHLAND MEADO y�• —� �, \ I I - -- 1 1 1. .\ 1 y _::::„....;-"..,,,./ A \ SCALE IN FEET 100 200 300 1 inch : 100 feet NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING SOILS ARE TYPE 'A' PER ANOKA COUNTY SOIL SURVEY. LEGEND +80000 SOIL BORING EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION WETLAND DELINEATION EXISTING CONTOURS TREE LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE EXISTING GRAVEL SURFACE RECEIVED MAY 112001 CITY OF LINO LAKES C N IX T. , " in s. = m • V) , Z o \ � m N • m rn W �/ w �9ei� Z CD W r U) W T. To \ o W • z E. Z Q g DRAWN BY TDL DATE 02/12/01 REVISIONS CAD FILE 20196EX PROJECT NO. 20196 FILE NO. DRAWER SHEET 2 OF 11 v Air 1 / :.:l:. vv. iik/ TISIll I /"i I-1 A • 1 vvIL_IVr1 1 52.7 w O O ' v0 1- 0^ V) T T / 204,00 S00 °37'02 "W -�If D'( 234.00 OUTLOT A 11459 SF. - 204.00 N00 °37'02 "E -'r f.1I mi � -- 204.00 S00 °33'26 "W 86.,9 n 97.07 r 8" \\ \ \ \\ 254° 23F \\ 2 150.58 DRAINAGE r'JJ & U11UTY EASEMENT -- 663.91 S00 °37'02 "W \ 1/ 5/ 1 1 I/, I CT- VV I L. I\ 7 r l I 108.04 77.32 ry 80,00 r ol I II „I 1184 S.F. :I I I \ 73.26 1 26232 V. IaJ1 53. 1 1U.8-r o r 1 - 9 1 69.47 / STREET 1 "A" 1• 20 25 -Th nm5 ,r \ 24 \' 0 1 - �',, - 13523 23. > 1) O I 1 22 % FF3 17163 u. _ CJ NO r ---9 a9 - o °► , 0 21 z 1 \\\ °1 132051f, r - 145.00 _ J^ F ▪ C, C C) isJf << 1- 1-a w� ct W NJ V) 0 Z0 cQr) `1 20 In 1 11647 51. If,' 115.°D - J �I 19 IP i$°'I 12565 Y. L - Ia3.J9 °A 18 1057 SF. L - fir, 83 6 L J1 A i, 7 -1 v I \ L_ 60,00 �1 00 O Lti eno 07 Z ,2226 SF. 33.50 30710 J2.67 /'� 1 // I °I ,b / // 12 L / 2 2M0] Si, 1 :r //3 2 i; 13130 SS. 1 bah J12.57 3.48 ,30.E ,7x0 SF. 13000 12 J �I 24 I1 10800 u. 11 L 13aa0 -J I 23F L - ,37.6: - ,J r ml EASEMENT ro: - - - - -• 22 11334 SF. 141.49 „240193. ° _ ') t, Ir\ I N Li A i,DC S00 °37'02 "W 177.76 0 SCALE IN FEET 60 120 180 OUTLOT B e4a . ,48.92 .38 5► 1 inch = 60 feet $ 1 16493_:. in _ 21.0• 1 o �� _ I MA ILY:::, J s,.a° 0I9.�� -2111 00.23 `1� �b V 45.53 "v31�i1�. "2 00 N07 °48'31 "E r *- - - -1 el- 7 z co 1 Z _ - fD ,n -C c°r S00 °33'15 "W C� �'_ e5.5e • � 68.15 <L c 50 z 0 4I L 13402 5.7. 7215 -05 - - 1 20 56.34 _ -;a p, -6° - - - 4. ,4260 17. el I � 02 =3 54,43 J r 7,45.30 / __ 28.08 \ 12 I / ,"c \ 14103 S.F. • /' - \N\ // 7413. 11 '10.40 r -30= -50-- S 1 W 1 - - N { 1 Ci o0 .) 0° - -60- ? - 4.80 25.23 16 1 26726 Sr. 1 I 4075 W I- [n I 0621 Sf �m - - 13241 1T 11.70 I ,a3 F. ° L138.40 >80.00 �a • C) / N89 °30'01 "W c,2- 1 S00 °33'15 "W oM u- _- 135.00 �<f 1 12 131 30 00 11942 5.F. J sl Ig r - - - -, 4 °1 x64 u. I` gl 11 I8 L 135.7° _ J $I moo sr. 12 r - - ---I L_ 81 5 41�r - - - --� 109x6 u, �I 10 1s La- 10904 41.06 34.80 75.48 ( 63.65 1 11 --t- 75A8 261 <r 0 C uJ I cc o 0 9 A. a5' I I / / 'o° 11632 r IN IIGG U- Q' 1 STREET "C" al ,ry \�J / 2013 704 F 15 % 52�p6 _\\ 29274 S.F. / / 14 \ \ m►1 \ \NN m,'�.1 0 nl 16\4j r2J 80 J\!, 47/ �S - 1 -35.W - „144 S.F. 1 - �J5.72 J $I 9 707°4 Sf. 18 - - - - _1 L _ 136.20 _ J 14 "1 8 IS 3244 SF. 01.12 J L N ,46077. 1 250.92 nl $I 793] 1 12 1 1 27523 5, I 1 11 19251 Sf. 10 ,9957 Sr. e STREET " 17- 8.95 7 0 203.34 0 CE oo CP 0, e44 _216.92_ d / 1 ,>27.41 - J2.67a•'� ------------------------------ _ ____________ ____ _ _+�- DRAINAGE 141.57 i 224.31 k 9 730'.0 u. 1 UTIUTY EASEMENT -___ 139.09 �I 1 I I_ -'I I I r1N I r\^ L L_lJL_L,IL_L_ \JIVU. 197.07 14675 S.F. 1 218....2____ 6 -a2 5 STREET "D" �r `"* 151 4 I \ k taw u. 8 51;15^ \ �I 20365 U. � r \ \\ 1, 10 f // 16418 u. �,L- J. gl / \X17P 1 "; - T r - J s ^1 r 2..49 Iry 11951 9.F. .I 1 L - - J 82.84 7i 1292.48 S00 °33'22 "W J I DRAINAGE k UMITYI EASEMENT .2., I`� 191.34 02.20 83.43 `\ 1 - 15015 S.F. 2202791- - 17012 sr. 213 49 30 30.00 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING ZONING R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) ACREAGE 33.68 ACRES PROPOSED PROPOSED ZONING TOTAL LOTS LOTS R.O.W. OUTLOTS SITE DATA R-1 70 25.92 ACRES 6.53 ACRES 0.94 ACRES OVERALL SMALLEST LOT AREA LARGEST LOT AREA AVERAGE LOT AREA 33.39 ACRES 38,239 S.F. 16,150 S.F. MINIMUM SETBACKS FRONT REAR SIDE YARD INTERIOR SIDE YARD CORNER (STREET) MINIMUM LOT VADTH 0 SETBACK MINIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT AREA 30 FEET 30 FEET 10 FEET 30 FEET 80 FEET 10,800 S.F. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOW THUS: 4 REM 5 FEET IN WIDTH ON ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH ON ADJOINING STREET LINES AND REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLAT PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION The West 860.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except Parcels 32. 33, 34, and 35, ANOKA COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 25, Anoka County, Minnesota And The East 300.00 feet of the West 960.00 feet of the North 680.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except Parcel 38, ANOKA COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 25, Anoka County, Minnesota And Outlot A, all in HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST 2ND ADDITION. according to the plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, And That part of Outlot C, HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST. according to the plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying northerly and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest. corner of said Outlot C; thence South 00 degrees 33 minutes 22 seconds West, assumed bearing along the West line a said Outlot C, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 54.94 feet; thence northeasterly a disance of 103.88 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having a central angle of 21 degrees 12 minutes 55 seconds and a' radius of 280.00 feet; thence northeasterly a disance of 60.23 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast., having a central angle of 21 degrees 12 minutes 55 seconds and a radius of 182.66 feet; thence North 89 degrees 30 minutes 01 seconds beginning. EIVED MAY 1 1 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES CC CC as CO 7 sss • as cc co L.1 130 ittgir o DRAWN BY PLM DATE REVISIONS 2/6/01 Fasements 3/1/01 I nal Le Bars. 4/6/01 I smut 5/9/01 Layout CAD FILE 20196pp.dwg PROJECT NO. 20196 FILE NO. 1-01-011 SHEET 3 OF 11 ANZITIv: 1-8.18837 RTrr V`F ?LW PET—'D 35 WAN STREET (CSAH NO 14:i : I 21 L_ SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 300 1 inch = 100 feet NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING SOILS ARE TYPE 'A' PER ANOKA COUNTY SOIL SURVEY. 6 I I 7 7 J 1FGFND —H t r - - ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, I y/ yip BENCHMARK FROM CITY OF LINO LAKES: 1.) TNH 726 MAIN STREET ELEV. = 918.82 2.) TNH WEST END LINO LAKES ELEMENTARY ELEV. - 914.96 1000 ■ WETLAND DATA: TOTAL WETLAND AREA ON SITE 42,081 5Q. FT. = 0.97 ACRES WETLAND FILL AREA 0 SQ. FT. = 0.00 ACRES NURP POND NWL AREA 94,940 SQ. FT. = 2.18 ACRES EXISTING ELECTRIC METER EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX EXISTING AIR CONDITIONING UNIT EXISTING GAS MARKER EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE EXISTING GRAVEL SURFACE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING FENCE EXISTING TREE LINE /TREES EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WETLAND PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PROPOSED WETLAND FILL RECEIVED MAY 1 1 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES V cd a) E 2500 W. Cn Ro DRAWN BY CMR /TDL DATE 02/12/01 REVISIONS WH N[v.. MS • v[e RCM •1*1 KV.. WOO CAD FILE 20196PG PROJECT NO. 20196 SHEET 4 OF 11 • LEGEND EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, —� �— EXISTING WATER MAIN > ❑ >— EXISTING STORM SEWER • PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 1- - 1 1 PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER NOTE' ALL SANITARY SEWER IS 8" PVC. .......:.�n.... .. N�IvFi..n. RL^,NT .,F P::.T...crn -25. MAIN STREET (cS /H rip 14) r - -1 I I I I I I I 1 I I c L 11 1 11 11 ^ II I I1 I `, I :r -1 1 - -J I -1 7 1 1 1 / L J ✓ —1 / 1 1 , 1 r— (---� I I i L J r 1 II 11 1 1 11 11 1 1 11 11 I 1 11 11 1 1 11 11 I L O 0 e wee I I I ._J L J IPMA L —� __J I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I Pre // I / I- -<\ r \ - - -- \ \ 1 1 \ 1 1 0 RECEIVED MAY 1 1 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES SCALE IN FEET 100 200 300 1 inch . 100 feel V ra4 DRAWN BY TDL DATE 04/07/01 REVISIONS oe/ee/■ QV. Wain CAD FILE 20196U PROJECT NO. 20196 SHEET 5 OF 11 ifi NOTE: SIGHNS SHALL BE PLACED APPROX. 50' APART ALONG TREE PROTECTION FENCE INDICATING IT IS A TREE PRESERVATION AREA, NO GRADING ALLOWED. uH LEGEND M rY 0 0 iP -1P— TP— IP— TP— TP -1P- 1000 EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING FENCE EXISTING TREE LINE /TREES EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE PROTECTION FENCE PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER 0 SCALE IN FEET 50 100 1 inch = 50 feet 150 41 • a TREE GROUP "A" -ii f3' 7r0 =sftc.8 to 4 � �: e 16 3 / 4 � 914 t - 91 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE /CONCRETE TRUCK CLEANOUT AREA RECEIVED MAY 1 1 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DATED THIS DAY OF 2001. JAMES 51080. OSLO REGISTRATION NUMBER 18380 V 0T) to to CC W W W Cr) W -J Cl- 8 l c ^V/ E i g m 1 m 8 1 x cn m cn 6 DRAWN BY TDL DATE 04/09/01 REVISIONS % fiym KY. 4■10111 CAD FILE 20196EX PROJECT NO. 20196 FILE NO. DRAWER SHEET 6 OF 11 LEGEND .w.- ...wrw... O TP— TP— TP— TP— TP— TP —TP- 1000 NOTE: SIGHNS SHALL BE PLACED APPROX. 50. APART ALONG TREE PROTECTION FENCE INDICATING IT 15 A TREE PRESERVATION AREA, NO GRADING ALLOWED. EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING FENCE EXISTING TREE LINE /TREES EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE PROTECTION FENCE PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER 0 SCALE IN FEET 50 100 1 inch = 50 feet 150 V C) �-7 RECEIVED MAY 1.1 2001 C T Y OF LINO LAKE` I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH15 PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT SWAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DA1E0 IH15 DAY OF 2001. JAMES 5TURM, OSLO REGI SIR AIION NUMBER 18380 DRAWN BY TDL DATE 04/09/01 REVISIONS 0B/B1/01 MY. NIWT CAD FILE 20196EX PROJECT NO. 20196 FILE NO. DRAWER SHEET 7 OF 11 • AGENDA ITEM 7 -C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Daniel Licht (NAC) CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 9, 2001 TOPIC: Site Plan Review -Lino Lakes Family Dentistry ACTION REQUESTED: 3/5 Vote BACKGROUND Lino Lakes Family Dentistry has submitted site and building plans for construction of a 5,067 square foot medical office building on property located on Apollo Drive. The subject site is approximately 65,340 square feet in size. The property is guided for future commercial development by the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned GB, General Business District. Medical office uses are allowed within this District as a permitted use. Development of a commercial use is subject to site and building plan review as provided for by Section 2, subd. 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. • This review is based on the following plan submittals: • Site Plan Grading/Drainage Plan Landscape Plan Utility Plan ANALYSIS received 14 May 2001 received 14 May 2001 received 14 May 2001 received 14 May 2001 Performance Standards The table below illustrates GB District performance standards in relation to the proposed site plan. The only issue is that the drive aisle on the west side of the building is set on the property line and not back 10 feet as required. This driveway is within a parking easement established over the common lot line with the property to the west and is indicated to be temporary. • Lino Lakes Family Dentistry Page 2 Building Design The building is a single story structure, 5,067 square feet in size with a pitched roof measured to be 19' high. The elevations feature cultured stone on the forward part of the south elevation and a lap siding of "cement board" on the remaining portion of the south elevation, as well as the sides and rear of the building. Additional cultured stone accents are provided at the corners of the building. The peaks of the pitched roof also use the plank material. Section 3, Subd. 4.B allows for use of decorative concrete panels for commercial uses. Provided that the "cement boards" is consistent with this classification of material the exterior of the building would conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The site plan includes a trash and recycling area at the northwest corner of the property. The trash enclosure is 6 feet in height and constructed out of hardy planks, which would complement the principal building design. Landscaping The landscape plan proposes a mixture of trees, shrubs and bushes on the front and sides of the building. The materials included within the landscaping plan are consistent with the types and sizes required for commercial uses. No landscaping has been provided for the portion of the property designated for future development. This area should be seeded to control erosion. The utility plan indicates a sprinkler system is to be provided that would serve the front portion of the lot. The system should be expanded to serve more of the property or additional measures made available for watering plantings. The landscape plan is subject to further review for compliance with CPTED standards. Required Proposed Lot size minimum 20,000 sq ft 65,340 sq ft Lot width minimum 100 ft. 420 ft. Setbacks: buildings from street rear lot line side lot line parking from street rear lot line side lot line 40 ft. 30 ft. 10 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 53.5 ft. 30.0 ft. 24.5 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 0 ft. Bldg. Height 45 ft. 19 ft. Green space 25 % 57.2% Building Design The building is a single story structure, 5,067 square feet in size with a pitched roof measured to be 19' high. The elevations feature cultured stone on the forward part of the south elevation and a lap siding of "cement board" on the remaining portion of the south elevation, as well as the sides and rear of the building. Additional cultured stone accents are provided at the corners of the building. The peaks of the pitched roof also use the plank material. Section 3, Subd. 4.B allows for use of decorative concrete panels for commercial uses. Provided that the "cement boards" is consistent with this classification of material the exterior of the building would conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The site plan includes a trash and recycling area at the northwest corner of the property. The trash enclosure is 6 feet in height and constructed out of hardy planks, which would complement the principal building design. Landscaping The landscape plan proposes a mixture of trees, shrubs and bushes on the front and sides of the building. The materials included within the landscaping plan are consistent with the types and sizes required for commercial uses. No landscaping has been provided for the portion of the property designated for future development. This area should be seeded to control erosion. The utility plan indicates a sprinkler system is to be provided that would serve the front portion of the lot. The system should be expanded to serve more of the property or additional measures made available for watering plantings. The landscape plan is subject to further review for compliance with CPTED standards. • Lino Lakes Family Dentistry Page 3 Access The site has one access to Apollo drive, which overlays the west lot line providing for a shared driveway with the abutting property. Access to Apollo Drive is subject to approval of the City Engineer and Anoka County under a joint power agreement. In addition to the shared access, the site plan provides a 12 foot drive aisle abutting the property line on the west side of the building, which accesses the trash enclosure and interior storage area. As noted above, this drive aisle is within an easement overlaying the west property line to provide for shared access and is intended to be temporary. The applicant is therefore requesting that this section of driveway be allowed asphalt curb. The parameters for the temporary allowance of the asphalt curb should be specified as part of the site plan approval. Circulation around site is adequate with a 26 -foot wide driveway leading to 12 -foot access aisles (24 foot two -way) for the parking areas and rear trash/storage area. Backing out of the north stalls in the parking area may be difficult because the backup lane is shallow. If possible, the parking stalls should be shifted south to increase the depth of the backup lane to improve access. Parking Off — street parking as required by Section 3, Subd. 5 of the Zoning Ordinance is outlined below. The building includes 5,067 square feet of floor area, divided between 4,039 square feet of office and 1,028 feet of storage. The applicant indicates that the storage space could be converted to additional office space The total requirement is 26 parking spaces based on the gross floor area of the building. If the calculation excludes the storage area, 22 spaces are required. The plan shows 23 spaces, of which three would need to be removed to provide an extension of the driveway to allow development of the east side of the property. With the potential full use of the property in mind, accommodation should be made for 26 parking stalls on the site plan outside of the area necessary to extend the driveway. The Planning Commission considered this information and recommends granting a variance for the number of stalls provided that any change in use of the site will require conformance with the number of parking stalls required. The proposed stalls measure 9 x 18 feet as required by Ordinance. One stall is designated as disability accessible consistent with ADA standards. However, the ramp leading down from the sidewalk encroaches into the area required to make the stall wide enough to be van accessible. The site plan should be revised to provide sufficient surface width such that the disability accessible stalls are van accessible. gross Code required area 90% requirement spaces Medical Office 5,067 4,560 3 + 1/200 sq. ft. 26 The total requirement is 26 parking spaces based on the gross floor area of the building. If the calculation excludes the storage area, 22 spaces are required. The plan shows 23 spaces, of which three would need to be removed to provide an extension of the driveway to allow development of the east side of the property. With the potential full use of the property in mind, accommodation should be made for 26 parking stalls on the site plan outside of the area necessary to extend the driveway. The Planning Commission considered this information and recommends granting a variance for the number of stalls provided that any change in use of the site will require conformance with the number of parking stalls required. The proposed stalls measure 9 x 18 feet as required by Ordinance. One stall is designated as disability accessible consistent with ADA standards. However, the ramp leading down from the sidewalk encroaches into the area required to make the stall wide enough to be van accessible. The site plan should be revised to provide sufficient surface width such that the disability accessible stalls are van accessible. • Lino Lakes Family Dentistry Page 4 Signage Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. The site plan indicates the location of a monument type business sign measuring 40 square feet. The sign is located to the south of the parking area approximately one foot from the lot line. Freestanding signs are required to be at least five feet from the lot line, so the site plan must be revised. Lighting The site plan does not identify exterior light fixtures. Any light fixtures to be installed must be shown on the site plan and accompanied by a photometric plan. Installation of exterior lighting must conform to the requirements of Section 3, Subd 4.H regarding glare. Utilities The proposed site is to be served by sanitary sewer and water services located within the Apollo Drive right -of -way. Service to the future development of the eastern portion of the subject site will have access to the planned connection lines. The submitted plans include a grading and drainage plans for review regarding runoff control and water quality. All utility and grading plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Park Dedication The City recently adopted a new park dedication policy. Cash fees in lieu of land dedication shall be paid in the amount calculated under the new policy. Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the application and they recommend approval of the site plan for Family Dentistry with the following conditions: 1. The site plan is revised such that all driveways and parking areas meet required setbacks. 2. Parking shall meet ADA standards. 3. Building materials used for the exterior facade are to be specified and must conform to the materials allowed for commercial uses. 4. The site plan is revised to identify any exterior light patterns and a photometric plan is provided illustrating the illumination pattern of all site lighting. 5. The landscape plan is revised to indicate all seeded or sod areas and measures for watering the full area. The landscape plan is subject to further review for consistency with CPTED Standards. Lino Lakes Family Dentistry Page 5 6. All utilities, easements and grading plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. Site access is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Anoka County. 8. Park dedication requirements are satisfied in the based upon current City policies and Ordinances. The applicant is submitting revised plans to address the conditions and concerns raised by the Planning and Zoning Board. An update will be provided at the Council meeting to indicate if conditions can be eliminated or modified. • • • 01 -92 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-92 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR LINO LAKES FAMILY DENTISTRY FOR A NEW SITE ON APOLLO DRIVE WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for site plan review; and WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: INSERT LEGAL ;and WHEREAS, site plan is generally consistent with the zoning regulations and performance standards; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this request at their June 13, 2001 meeting and they recommend approval subject to conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the site plan for Lino Lakes Family Dentistry subject to the following conditions: 1. The site plan is revised such that all driveways and parking areas meet required setbacks. 2. Parking shall meet ADA standards. 3. Building materials used for the exterior facade are to be specified and must conform to the materials allowed for commercial uses. 4. The site plan is revised to identify any exterior light patterns and a photometric plan is provided illustrating the illumination pattern of all site lighting. 5. The landscape plan is revised to indicate all seeded or sod areas and measures for watering the full area. The landscape plan is subject to further review for consistency with CPTED Standards. 6. All utilities, easements and grading plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. Site access is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Anoka County. 8. Park dedication requirements are satisfied in the based upon current City policies and Ordinances. • Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 • ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • • ____ vele kw a II P.-1:41 EznA.7_ 0:1:111111rwrstmeent Astwoigeu -STATE-A10-HIGHW, 1 . Li 114111 5 -6-GUNTY 1/WY.-RI6HT-10F IVA* PtA-F NUMOER-E-5 - AIM giacow# 11111 V "verzwitinaticol li 111111111tWateRLYZEZ P IWIL kIIIN i I 5 1:1111" 111111111111111111111 0 Yr Or .61.44. ming m■ 4 • go gin meg tt:Ir°1"1"17°Ailiii iiiiiiiiiii1111111111 —Li- Pk AO 11W1113 gal Amu. Millinib I IP WWI) 11111J111 III rel Ir *11110411 iiiii BM 10101111111 A M1111111 OE rErALira W III 111111=11:1V iaingligingrrivr In . 2111 1113WW AllW - tihriit AmAfic„ir,,,,,111 II §P. iroawdommil 1 1 17:111(1/ 0 III ariVeli • 9 timt w -, OV 0 L A Pg SS SN 6 GEORGE CERTIICTE OF SURVEY FOR: Circle-L ex VFW N .�s ' 03 O to to 3 N 0 a1 C Li • • 247.33 Q X911.51 911.08 i -r: X911.56 X91;1.85 X911.75 X 0 912.45 C OA?6 : 5/ t0 PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 9180 LEXINGTON AVE. N.E. CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014 (763) 785 -1043 FAX 786.6007 PR RECEIVED MAY 1 5 2001 CITY Y OF LINO LAKE PEP X911,87 91214 "t. X911.65 B "Box 911.72 X911.99 X911.57•,.• 912.23 912.53 X912.71 91'''3 20 912. X912.66 X913.30 .X913.03 S. life of the S89°062'4,27 E N. 693 feet X913.76 X 91.3(5;42.81 10 "pin *'' :912.85 x914.00 .............. "'.X913.99 X914.39 412.07 915.20 8-pine 6"pine 914.94 913.89 10-cherry 914.58 NORTH ' •973.. 912.41 912.31 10-Box 10 10'9ox 10-8oz 1212 912.77 -o E 0 41 0 O 0 /20 913.57 LJ i2.67 C:).912.14 8-Box X912.84 •••• 16 "box '913.07 X • n' 912.92 3.11 8 -oak X912.1 65.34 1.5C A , X911.0 912.54 t __y 1 /1/ r X911.25 r 9\ '• X917.15 .23 ox 911.74 6"eedor X911.82 911.12 . X910.66 X910.8 11.87 12-box 10-pine 913.93 973.. 6 pine 914.85 974' ............................. f• 913.99 , acres X9110 sq. ft, � . X910.85 X911.50 • • • 910.66 X911.23 X910.47 X910.57 X910.41 / / 910.18 R1: ..................... 4.911.35 "H• 911.33 47" 2'3.4 910.99 R= 868.51 ............. ..... 911.58 911.09 X911.03 • 911.20 12.03 211/95 911.30 909 0 909.65 " Inv =884,181 909,18' ............ San' ASH 10.63 909.11 Storm MH / Inv. 901.8! 909.64 The East 412.07 feet of Lot 16, Auditors Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying within the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Tying south of the North 693.00 feet and lying north of the 100.00 foot road easement for Apollo Drive as per Doc. 908.68 908.26 Inv- 903.5tN Inv. - 902.51E -W 909.44 '911••••.•'• "9109,68 is 910.31 ' "909......., 908.12 812.25- ........ g12' 908.52 47 1•• 12.50 ` 1 912.99 .10 '•. 911:13 908.99 909.77 ,4 ,. I / t A - 0 0 A OI -2'1 Ts Scale 1"= 50' Drawn By: CWS Project Manager: XXX o Denotes Iron Set • Denotes. Iron Found Bearings shown are / hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that l am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this day of , 2001. License No. Job No.: on an assumed datum. E.G.RUD 4 SONS, INC. LAND SURVEYORS 9ISP, LEXINGTON AVE. NO. CIRCLE PINES, MINNESOTA 55014 -3625 TEL. 163- 186 -5556 FAX 163- 186 -600-1 • • AREA SQ. FT. % SWAT HARD SURFACE 20,697 29 IMPROVED DEVELOPMENT 34,112 100 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 31,228 NA • _ - Lar1le war , MAIM / f Y Yr. 1! NMI •Xal PANCINO rensAuc ernM M--Ir-r 1 I 7.1 ` Chi y M1 3 x " 1�� 1 // �i r bolt_ i , F ; FUTURE DEVELOPMENT %J 90D At' ' = ' 11R114 MN�- - FUTURE STRUCTURE URE I wt yi;� i M 4i'9HQM1 a 1 L •/f.YIY 1 ■sue.. n ■r - -.��= IIAI! ow A i °iiiiii,■..�■ - ��a °�- u��;;• +• t71TAilY1 - i ti- - -- _ M� �� ME XXX CJ T1 P) PM • •• x tr a IoYal Pities � zaticY —� "- mamma 211104 TO BE IIIELOGAleD I'<TII , 'IL ,• MOM DlVELOPMMNT �/ k. 0: -._Q. .1 N- @&rE PLAN -wa IEONTTD O lr01041D LOGAL Ott LINO LAKES FAMILY DENTAL +— A.e,DOOIrowK,D OCCIII PACs sari �SIGWAGE t1v - 11a TRASH RECYCLE ENCLOSURE 114' -1'a CONTEXT PLAN REVIStrns: RECEIVED MAY 1 t.Z001 CITY OF LIN DRANO! 811 XXXR CHECKED OM ZiOu LINO LAKES FAMILY DENTISTRY A1.2 LAKE. ORANN BM. X%XX cream BY: Z: \LLF2\DWG \LLF2A1.dwg, 05/11/2001 02:31:50 AM • •=1 MID =NM ce. R • 110.53 CUTLET 906.50 INV 90553 . . Iff.:„. •....• _. AIIIIMMINI001111111111111M1111 AM 1111111■NP•"— --4..... __--- IMP 1 L. IM-ET 80530 OUTLET R051:72 .11.• WOO MIN • .111•••••••••■■••••■■••■•••••••■■••■••••••••••••••• • • -"" ..••••••• • C)u-nt_rry PLAN V■W4 ZALLF21DINGNLLF2A1.dwg, 05/11/2001 02:32:20 AM ••• "3-t.; :• 1: • . erg • ... • • REVSMNS: REC MAY CITY OF DRAW BY: XXIX CHECKE) BY: IVED 4 2001 o LA.1 • A1.4 • 4. OUP- O OLANDSCAPE PLAN r -2747 Z: \LLF2\DWG \LLF2A1.dwg, 05/11/2001 02:32:50 AM DESIGNATION NAME BOTANICAL. NAME QTY SIZE A SUGAR MAPLE ACER SACCHARUM "MAJESTY 2 2" B MARHALL'S SEEDLESS ASH FRAXINUS PENSYLVANICA "MARSHAL'S SEEDLESS' 1 2" C RIVER BIRCH BETULA NIGRA 1 2• D PAPER BARK MAPLE ACER GRISEUM 1 *7 gal E MADONA FLOWERING CRAB MALLS 'NAZA ' 3 *15 gal F DWARF BURNING BUSH EUONYOMUS ALATUS •COMPACTUS• 1 *5 gal 0 AMUR MAPLE ACER GINNALA "BAILEY COMPACTUS• NOT BIGUS• 1 *10 gal H EMERALD ARBORVIATE THUJA OCCIDENTALLS •E4RALD• 14 *7 gal 1 JIM DANDY WINTERBERRY L VERIrILICALLATA "JIM DANDY• B *5 gal J HOLLY'S HONEY •HOSTA• 13 *1/2gal K SNOW MOUND SPIREA APIRAEA NIPPONICA "SNOWMOUND" 4 *2 gal L SUNGOLD FALSECYPRESS CHAMAECYPARIS PISIFERA •FILIFERA SUNGOLD" 14 *2 gal M LITRE PRINCESS SPIREA SPIREA JAPONICA 'LITTLE PRINCESS" 2 15 gal N ANNUALS O MESCANTHIUS 4 *1/2 gal RECEW MAY 142t CITY OF LINO • aeacm ar- 3 1 A1.5 D 01 KES • • r OPER Let] OPER OPER LI OPER O OFFICE HALL HALL 116 MATCH LINE III OPER Mg IN II O® IP OPER mil HALL 1'33 HALL CJ CONF 7-7 MEN'S EDI ENTRY COURT loo \\ ‘, \, ‘, ‘, \, \\ \\ 1\ 11 1, 11 11 1, WAITING AREA I.I LAB ELI LAU ENTRY STORAGE EDI C3 Z: \LLF2 \DWG \LIf2A2.dwg, 05/11/01 09:18:01 AM 7 MATCH INE AIR LOCK G RECEP MAY 14 CITY OF LINT ORANNBY. XXXX CHECKED EY: D 001 LAK4 F. LINO LAKES FAMILY DENTISTRY A 212 • d a F– SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4_1 0- 711111111111ME-171=W- ■IEE • •F ■ •1U Semlnallt s•� • 11 1 u II u 41 41 41 4, 4, 4, EAST ELEVATION 114' 10' Z:\LLF2\DWG \LLF2A3.dwg, 05/11/2001 02:36:33 AM • E — 11 II II II :4 Pk PLIIL ELM/ Term sue eo * ▪ Pi 1* TOP !L MAP. AOtd PM. rLla ILLY TIP Q sus MOH OW T P. 10,-M OAP nth._ r"- • _ ,::_.a. -:.� • �s�•:��', 1 is i Lls '1 IM IU I�UP WEAN 1 .11 't-• •I_ Ell I" +i_s r.•A= a �I t .- Iat'" Sar' RECEWW MAY 142 LINO LAKES FAMILY DENTISTRY A 3.1 • • PR /NP. ILLY • TOP AP NAM TAMTaK ( � 1117-.11114110 ONORTh ELEVATION t /M -1U 17 G. F+ 17 . _.I TIP QYAO +1-+w Tar. +4..4w TOP Q SLAIN 414 INIP Tall 1104 MAY �WEST ELEVATION 114' -10 Z: \LLF2 \DWG \LLF2A3.dwg, 05/11/2001 02 :36:04 AM TOP QtLM 0154 TaR +ww uY:SIG S: RECEV MAY 11 2 CITY Oa : !NO DRAWN er: xxnc cream er: 0 C01 .EKES gliq 1585 f tOr§pg oh a 10i a 2 LINO LAKES FAMILY DENTISTRY A3.2 • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUESTED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 7 -D Alan Brixius (NAC) July 9, 2001 1st reading of Ordinance 14 -01 Rezoning Resolution 01 -93 Minor Subdivision ISD 12 Rezoning Request from L -I to PSP at Middle School Site 4/5 Vote on Rezoning 3/5 Vote on Minor Subdivision ISD 12 has a letter of intent to purchase 15+ acres of industrial zoned land located at the northeast corner of the existing Centennial Middle School site for the purpose of building a new elementary school. The site is currently zoned L -I, Light Industrial and would require a change in zoning to PSP, Public /Semi- Public District to accommodate the elementary school. The School District has requested consideration of the following development applications to facilitate a new elementary school at this location: 1. Rezoning from L -1, Limited Industrial Zoning District to PSP, Public /Semi- Public Zoning District. 2. Subdivision to create a parcel to be conveyed to the School District. These applications are evaluated in greater detail in the body of this report. This review is based on the following: Site Location Site Survey Concept Plan ANALYSIS Location of Elementary School Upon investigation of the needed elementary school, the School District has selected the proposed site next to the Centennial Middle School for the following reasons: 1. In review of the School District's enrollment distribution and forecasts, approximately 60 percent of the present and future enrollment population lives west of Lake Drive and County Road 49. The proposed site provides a centralized location to best serve the School District's population. • • • ISD 12 Rezoning - Industrial June 13, 2001 page 2 2. The current vacant Birch Street location lies in close proximity to the existing Rice Lake Elementary and Centerville Elementary. Construction of another school along Birch Street is seen as a duplication of facilities. 3. The proposed site's proximity to the Centennial Middle School allows the elementary school to share facilities with the middle school (i.e., play equipment, play fields). This allows the elementary school to be located on a smaller site thus reducing the School District's investment in land acquisition and development of on -site recreational facilities. Rezoning Existing Zoning: The 15 acre site is zoned L -I, Limited Industrial District and exists as part of the Lake Business Park subdivision. The L -I Zoning District does not allow elementary schools as an allowed use therefore mandating the rezoning request. The proposed site lies within the Lake Business Park preliminary plat that was approved in 1998. The site being considered by the School District is isolated on the far west end of the Lake Business Park preliminary plat by an existing wetland. This end of the preliminary plat is intended to gain access to Lake Drive via a 1,150 feet long cul -de -sac. The rezoning and subdivision would significantly reduce the needed cul -de -sac length for the industrial park. Proposed Zoning: The requested zoning for the 15+ acre parcel is PSP, Public /Semi- Public District. The purpose of this district is described as follows: This district is designed and intended to aid in guiding development towards fulfillment of the Comprehensive Plan and to serve the following functions: 1. To provide the community with properly located schools, colleges, and health institutions. 2. To provide the community and properly located public services, and utilities. 3. To provide the community with properly located open green space, parks, playgrounds and recreational facilities. 4. To relate public and semi- public locations with thoroughfare system. The PSP Zoning District allows for public and private schools by conditional use permit. At this time, only the zoning and subdivision requests are being considered. The • ISD 12 Rezoning - Industrial June 13, 2001 page 3 conditional use permit will be processed as a separate application with the site plan details. Rezoning Evaluation Criteria: In consideration of rezoning requests, the possible adverse effects of the amendment should be considered. Generally speaking, the City Council and Planning Commission's judgment of the rezoning should be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provision of the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). 4. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities, and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. • 5. Traffic generation of the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. • Comprehensive Plan Due to the limited application of the PSP Zoning District, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan seldom applies this land use category except where the use exists or where there is public ownership of the property. Recognizing this condition, the 1990 Land Use Plan and the Proposed 2020 Land Use Plan guides this site for industrial use. The Planning Commission and City Council must therefore determine the appropriateness of this zoning change on the applicable policies of the 1987 Comprehensive plan and the proposed 2020 Comprehensive Plan policies that relate to the rezoning request. 1987 Comprehensive Plan Policies • Future community development shall take into account social, economic, and environmental opportunities and constraints in an effort to provide an optimal arrangement of future land use activities. • Where possible, land uses will be grouped together, according to similarity of their characteristics, in order to minimize potential negative impacts. Where conflicting land uses must be located adjacent to one another, steps will be taken to minimize the potential negative impacts. • Urban development will be encouraged to locate within the areas of the community where public investments (streets, utilities, police and fire protection, • • ISD 12 Rezoning - Industrial June 13, 2001 page 4 parks, etc.) have already been provided to meet the needs of existing development. This policy will be promoted in an effort to maximize benefit from existing public investments. 2020 Land Use Policies (Proposed) Growth Management, Page 24 • Promote an orderly development pattern that capitalizes on in -place utility and service investment. Land Use, Pages 26 -27 General Goal • Develop a cohesive land use pattern that insures compatibility and functional relationships among activities. General Policies • Establish a cohesive image for the entire community through the uniform application of community promotion, land use development, design and service. • Build on community strengths such as regional parks, environmental quality, open space, strong residential neighborhoods, quality local government, and excellent school and park amenities in defining the City's identity. • Ensure that changes in types of land use occur either at center, mid -block points so that similar uses front on the same street, or at borders of areas separated by major man-made or natural barriers. Community Facilities, Pages 38 -39 Goals • Maintain, improve existing services, and develop new community facilities and services to meet the needs and interests of the community. • Provide for safe, easy access to all facilities and services within the community. • Coordinate facilities and services on a joint use basis between various governmental units to avoid duplication and provide cost effective services. School Policies • Coordinate community growth with the School District to insure proper school facilities to meet future population needs. The School District's interest in creating a shared elementary and middle school campus does economize an existing investment, promote a greater utilization of existing facilities, and is located in a manner that best serves the School District's residents. In this regard, the proposed land use and zoning change is consistent with the Comprehensive plan policies. Within the 2020 proposed Comprehensive Plan under Staged Growth Area Rules, the following recommendation is made: • • ISD 12 Rezoning - Industrial June 13, 2001 page 5 "In considering land trades, the City will discourage the exchange of developable commercial or industrial zoned land for a proposed residential development." While the rezoning of the industrial land will not directly accommodate residential growth, the School District, in a related application, is requesting that the existing Birch Street parcel be rezoned from PSP to R -1X, Single Family Residential. The City must determine if this requested zoning change is inconsistent with this recommendation. It should be noted that this is a unique request in that it is driven by the facility needs of the School District rather than private development. Land Use Compatibility: To determine the appropriateness of the proposed use, it is beneficial to examine the adjoining land use and zoning. Direction Use Zoning North I -35W L -I South Middle School/Vacant PSP/L -I East Industrial/Vacant L -I West Middle School PSP The proposed site adjoins the middle school site which allows a shared campus arrangement. I -35W represents a physical separation from land uses to the north. Industrial zoning will adjoin the site on the east and southeast. This area was preliminary platted in 1998 under the name of Lake Business Park. This preliminary plat reveals that storm water drainage ponds and a wetland physically separate the proposed site from most of the industrial area. The Lake Business Park preliminary plat relied on a 1,150 - foot long cul -de -sac to provide access to the westernmost lot. Long cul -de -sacs provide poor street access for industrial traffic and site access. Performance Standards: The School District would need to submit an application for conditional use permit to allow a school in the PSP District per Section 9.I.1 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. The applicant has submitted a survey and concept plan with the subdivision request. In review of this information, we offer the following comment/suggestions: 1. The site exceeds the lot area for a PSP lot. 2. The site fails to provide for adequate lot width, frontage on a public street, or setback from the south and west property lines. 3. A wetland delineation is necessary for site development based on information submitted with the Lake Business Park preliminary plat. The eastern portion of • • ISD 12 Rezoning - Industrial June 13, 2001 page 6 the site has wetland constraints that must be addressed in the site design. Any wetland filling will require a wetland replacement plan. 4. The survey indicates that only the eastern half of 4th Avenue has been vacated. To accommodate the proposed development, the balance of 4th Street through the site must be vacated. 5. A utility easement following the 4th Street alignment must be established and recorded. The subdivision should also show ten -foot drainage and utility easements along the side and rear property lines. To avoid the need for lot width and building setback variances associated with the creation of a new lot, we would recommend that the proposed site be combined with the existing middle school site to create a single parcel. Combining the lots will allow the elementary school to utilize middle school land to meet the City's performance standards. Section 3.C.3 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance allows more than one principal building on PSP lots provided that all the performance standards of the Zoning Ordinance are met. Public Service Capacity: The site lies within the existing MUSA. The proposed site and school is not anticipated to overburden existing in -place utilities or municipal services. Transportation: The elementary school will gain its site access via shared driveways with the middle school accessing Elm Street. The combined campus will allow the middle school and elementary school to share bus service. The elementary school will be designed to accommodate between 750 and 1,000 students, resulting in staffing of approximately 75 people. Bus traffic, staff and visitor traffic will be the anticipated traffic generation. This traffic is not anticipated to overburden existing streets serving the site. RECOMMENDATION Any land use or zoning change is a policy decision that is determined by the City Council. In this request, the Council must weigh its decision against the criteria outlined in the body of this report. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this request and they recommend approval of the zoning change and minor subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. The elementary school site is combined with the middle school site to create a single lot. 2. The applicant pursue a conditional use permit and submit detailed development plans for the site. The site plan should illustrate how the plan will be integrated with the middle school. ISD 12 Rezoning - Industrial June 13, 2001 page 7 • 3. Wetland replacement plans will be required and subject to the review and approval of Rice Creek Watershed. 4. Vacation of the west half of 4th Street through the proposed site will be required. 5. Appropriate easements must be established over all existing utilities and along side and rear lot lines. • • • Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 14- 01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM LI, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO PSP, PUBLIC -SEMI PUBLIC The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. Rezoning this site from LI, Light Industrial District to PSP, Public -Semi Public District is consistent with policies and provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan. • 2. The Existing Land Use Map indicates that the subject property is adjacent to the middle school and property zoned for Industrial use. The parcel is separated from the industrial land by a storm water pond and wetland area. 3. This application meets the standards for rezoning outlined in the City Code. However, prior to actual construction of the proposed facility, the applicant must receive approval of a site plan and CUP in compliance with all applicable performance standards and combine this lot with that of the middle school. 4. Rezoning this site will not overburden the City's service capacity. 5. Rezoning this site from LI, Limited Industrial District to PSP, Public -Semi Public District will not have an adverse effect on traffic at the site. Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on June 13, 2001. Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by • rezoning from LI, Light Industrial District to PSP, Public -semi Public District, the following described real estate: • • • INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section 4. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. • 01 -93 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-93 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 FOR THE CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City has received an application for minor subdivision for the proposed school site; and WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on June 13, 2001; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 14 -01 rezones the subject site to PSP, Public -Semi Public; and WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the minor subdivision for the Centennial School District. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • SITE LOCATION MAP PARCEL BOUNDARIES in �tuesuon j ! "j gl Till X11 "' u_.nnmmmi mnnal, ' iiIIIIIIIIIIBIIIIIW 4pra .� Y..r..711111�h. ik" . AIlI lle i 4. 111111 City of Centerville LEGEND Parcel Boundaries Water Bodies 2 0 2 Miles EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATION LINO LAKES NM SYI101411 • sa12121.1.0100112sn.ua.a. V3NV 03101d AlM3N NO S -N 1O0FDS ANV.LN3 W313 1VINN31N33 ?MN 3141 Ire • v 1 <4.„:14,. / Uv `O l / crtrc �A a /j 3. h. IL.00N 00981 10'lrr .. 3.11, /L.00N 9 3.11• /L.00N —•- - -- \ Lpp In W J — armor 3 : "" N....iaaor- 3 /H 3 znAr2'iy_ v ti ✓i W W °3 v yeh W 4 Y� c risiri do gig O 4. to .4 NN EXHIBIT B - SITE SURVEY NIVVINVIONVI 441.771510100101/10M.SIKINI VDIV C111.01c1A1M3N NO 5-)11001-OS AllYIN3IN313 WINN-11NX) M3N • 4.911:11400M WWI mass 9 212 011111111111111111 LZ 'It 'fil 1.1S\ al1111111111111111.11 1. t2S 1 EXHIBIT C - CONCEPT PLAN. • • • AGENDA ITEM 7 E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: July 9, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution 01 -94, Final Plat Behm's Farm Park Addition ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The City Council approved the preliminary plat for Behm's Farm Park Addition on May 29, 2001. We have received a request for approval of the final plat. The City typically requires a number of things for a final plat approval. These include: • Final plat must substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat. • Development agreement must be completed, including financial securities. • Title must be reviewed by City Attorney. • Conditions of approval must be met. The final plat conforms to the preliminary plat. No development agreement is necessary, as all roads and utilities exist. The City Attorney has confirmed that no title work is necessary for the plat approval because the City owns the property and will be selling it to the developer. The conditions of approval for the preliminary plat are as follows: 1. Ordinance 01 -01 must be in effect (30 days after publication) before the final plat can be recorded. 2. Ordinance 02 -01 must be in effect (30 days after publication) before the final plat can be recorded. 3. The developer must notify purchasers of residential lots of the existence of the nearby Lino Air Park. The developer must provide to the City a copy of the notification format to be used before final plat approval by the City. The two ordinances were published June 18. They will be in effect July 18. The closing (when the City will sell the land to the developer) has been arranged for July 20. The City will not release the signed plat hardshells for recording until July 18. This requirement is included in Resolution 01 -94 approving the final plat. • • The developer has provided a copy of the disclosure statement. It notifies buyers that "typical aircraft operations may result in perceptible noise and light effect" within the development area. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 01 -94 approving the final plat of Behm's Farm Park Addition. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • 01 -94 Council Member adoption. introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-94 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR BEHM'S FARM PARK ADDITION WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a final plat, and WHEREAS, review and approvals of plats are governed by state statutes and City ordinances, and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat for Behm's Farm Park Addition was approved with Resolution 01 -06 by the City Council on May 29, 2001, and • WHEREAS, the final plat for Behm's Farm Park Addition received by the City complies with City requirements, and WHEREAS, Resolution 01 -06 included conditions of approval which require that Ordinance 01 -01 and Ordinance 02 -01 be in effect before the final plat is recorded and these ordinances will become effective July 18, 2001, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the final plat for Behm's Farm Park Addition. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City will not release the signed plat for recording prior to July 18, 2001. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk • day of , 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Dahl and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • BEHM'S FARM PARK ADDITION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the City of Lino Lakes, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, owner and proprietor, of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, to -wit: Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, Block 2, SUNSET OAKS, according to the duly recorded plat thereof. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as REHM'B FARM PARK ADDITION and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the park and easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on the plat. In witness whereof said City of Lino Lakes, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of Signed: Signed: CITY OF LINO LAKES John J. Vergeson as Mayor Ry -Chel tlauetad as Clerk State of Minnesota County of The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 200_, by Thomas Oaroec, as Mayor and James B. Norman, as Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, on behalf of said Corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires, January 31, 2005 I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the land described on this plat as BERM'S FARM PARK ADDITION; that this plat is a correct representation of said survey; that all distances are correctly shown on said plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown on said plat; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on said plat; and that there are no public highways or wetlands to be designated on said plat other than as shown thereon. Milton E. Hyland, Land Surveyor Minnesota Registration No. 20262 State of Minnesota County of Hennepin The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this of , 200_, by Milton E. Hyland, land Surveyor. day Ruthanne Mary Hyland, Notary Public, Henn. Co., Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22. LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA We hereby certify that the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, duly accepted and approved the plat of BEHM'S FARM PARK ADDITION at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 200_ If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommenda- tions, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA Mayor Clerk This plat of BEHM'S FARM PARK ADDITION was checked and approved by me this day of , 200_ Anoka County Surveyor C; FZC+7 JUN 291007 Cal' OF Lifvu LAKES JUN HY -- LAND SURVEYING, P.A. LAND SURVEYORS CWFFT 1 nF 7 CI- IFF'TC 1 • • BEHM'S FARM PARK ADDITION f -1 It A'S LjL_fllvl /r r -.1-V1 1LI\ r A X16 A \I \IVI O 2) A l r' 411,1n I A n t r- e-) i %\ L. V I V I I I V V L i-A I V 1._ ■ J NORTH LINE OF LOT 16, BLOCK 2, SUNSET OAKS ----- n ----578.86 N 67 °09'10" E NW CORNER 80.00 80.00 `;; -- -- 153.86 -- OF LOT 16: 425.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 , E 1 r1 3 w 3 0 3 0 0 4 ▪ 5 0 0 to in 20 b M (V 1y� M tV y��B. �J° tV /' /'(� O1'?. to N 1 I 2 nJS `�4 z �'P'� __:1:1:- "� ✓ 4 • O 1 f c`, /'' `� S0 co '�S :.L _N87 "03'15 "E - '1J�' OO 5/, 1 s _`� _ _ 1 s - �J,,1 0 ?g, �.0 t 68.20 / Z/ 2 . .4\ 0 O M 1; H 67.p1 a - O i *1:1,,,,L,'' i \\'l.O�,Sg f, ,` f M 80.00 ' 'b - `. 0 M r11 I L i J L '7: -9.51 80.00 i 80.00 :, 9 -_ -- _ 31.74 80.00 0 62.80 - - - - ti- 1.,, f `' ` - - -- ----400.00 ��1,587 °09'10 "W 93.63 N87 °03'15 "E 0 5TH 1 30 J 30 A r\r.,1, -Int`1 C\ Li 1 1 I V 1 v L_ 0 0 I M I 0 M M WEST LINE OF LOTS 13,14,15, & 16, BLOCK 2, SUNSET OAKS - - -.., 0 0 0 0) 0 O F 0 In O I N 0 2 2 L 80.00 J 0 ' ,< iiyy , Y - M ' / ' / ' -' V'( -\cj ----- --1- 1`,0 F.' \ • 20 _I, , '4- - --- -- _-;,'y51'• '� r- 'I , `30 / 4'�- -' .6 ,V .- 4 438.01 1 -ti - -- 573.22 N 87 °21'40" E--- --- -- -SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13, BLOCK 2, SUNSET OAKS S00 °30'46 "W -- 0 0 33 33 v r7", - •135.00/' N89 °29114 "W - -;; a a J7.34, -1 b 3 a/ C -36.40 w r S58•48'39'W r- tj 0 0 0 0 0 %.,49 1 �J- sk L J 135.00 N89 °29'14 "W1 1 J_ t� O 2 O O 0 0 I z • - 1 N <C FYI a I 135,00 S89 °29'14 "E --- -t. m O J 1 1°n 0 z i - - -- 135.00 N89 °29'14 "W - - - -a ri Ar "IN In st (�I(c. ° °I1(j ' O L J 0 O to M 0 Z J w °z '`-- 135.00 N89 °29'14 "W V' ( ) N 2 135.21 0 vi 12 33 1 33 h ''CURT CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22. 0 50 100 150 SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET 0 - DENOTES IRON MONUMENT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13, BLOCK 2, SUNSET OAKS HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 87 °21'40" EAST. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: 5---)4 [<- 5 to - - ---� o BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES, AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. (72 e ,p JUN 2 9 2001 CITY OP LINO LAKES HY -LAND SURVEYING, P.A. LAND SURVEYORS AGENDA ITEM 7F STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 9,2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 - 95, Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids - 2001 Sealcoat Project BACKGROUND: Each year the City maintains its streets by sealcoating. Sealcoating places a thin layer of oil and rock on the street to enhance the surface. Candidate streets include new streets that received the wear course 2 - 3 years ago and all other streets are done on a 5 - 7 year cycle. This year, approximately 7 miles of streets will be sealcoated at an estimated cost of $87,000. The 2001 budget includes $58,850 for sealcoating. It is proposed to fund the difference between the budget amount and the final bid amount from the City's Sealcoat fund. City staff has prepared the plans and specifications for this work and are requesting Council approval to advertise for bids. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 01 - 95, approving the plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids for the 2001 sealcoat project. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 01 - 95 RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution Number 01 - 95 be adopted. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -95 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS - 2001 SEALCOAT PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for 2001 Sealcoating Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin and advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for ten days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk until 10 a.m. on Tuesday, July 24, 2001, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, August 13, 2001, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of July, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Rychel Gaustad, City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTI FICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on July 9, 2001. Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk • • AGENDA ITEM 7G STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 9, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 - 96 - Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids, 2001 Wearing Course VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The City undertakes a paving project each year to place the final layer of bituminous, known as the wearing course, in those developments where the majority of the lots have been built on. The funding for this work is provided by assessments to the respective subdivisions. The subdivisions receiving wearing course this year include Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition, Trappers Crossing 2nd and 3rd Additions, and Pheasant Hills Preserve 10th Addition. The schedule for this project is as follows: City Council Approves Plans and Specifications July 9, 2001 City Council Authorizes Ad for Bids July 9, 2001 Open Bids August 20, 2001 City Council Awards Contract August 27, 2001 Construction Begins September 3, 2001 OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 01 -96 approving the plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 2001 Wearing Course. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 01 -96. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution Number 01 -96 be adopted. • Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -96 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS — 2001 WEARING COURSE WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 2001 Wearing Course, and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for ten days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk until 10:00 a.m. on Monday, August 20, 2001, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, August 27, 2001, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of July, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on July 9, 2001. Ry -Chel Gaustad, City Clerk • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES June 19, 2001 . 5:30 p.m. . 9:55 p.m. : Council Member Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson : Carlson Staff members present: Administration Director, Dan Tesch; City Engineer, John Powell; Economic Development Director, Brian Wessel (part); ri. Ic Development Assistant, Mary Alice Divine (part); Finance Director, Al Ro e s art); hief of Police, Dave Pecchia (part); Community Development Director, eG , Environmental Specialist, Marty Asleson (part); and City Planner, Jeff TOWN CENTER UPDATE, BRIAN WESSEL Marketplace, Brian Wessel — Economic D velo project is on schedule. Staff will make a rec Board on July 11, 2001. A recomme 2001. Staff's main concern is the a regarding this issue. The projec nt Director stated the Marketplace tion to the Planning and Zoning made to the City Council on July 23, A meeting will be held on Thursday to the final phase of the development plan. The Village Developmen e — Economic Development Director Wessel stated the intent this eve= • o go " hrough the preliminary letter of intent to end up with a development a r the next phase of development. Economic Development • ssistant Divine distributed a draft of the letter and preliminary site plan for The Village. She briefly reviewed the site plan noting there have been no changes to the plan. She also reviewed the Letter of Intent in detail that outlines the City responsibilities and development responsibilities, with an accompanying timetable. She indicated staff would like to add the Letter of Intent to the regular Monday Council agenda. She noted the Letter of Intent is not a binding contract. Council Member Reinert asked if the development is contingent upon a second access. Mr. Ross Fefercorn advised there are currently two (2) accesses requested for this development, one at Town Center Parkway and one near 35W ramp. The developer requests an additional access to Lake Drive. It has not yet been determined that an access can be provided at the I -35 (northbound) ramps. The Engineering Department will pursue this request with MnDOT and FHWA. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 • Council Member Reinert clarified that the $450,000 grant will go to development in the first phase. He asked if there is enough land for a possible Phase 3 development. Economic Development Assistant Divine stated the additional land has always been wetland. The developers may determine the additional 10 acres can be developed. Council Member Reinert expressed concern regarding the current plan being the entire plan. He asked when the senior housing would be built. • Mr. John Duffy advised the development of the senior housing could begin next summer. The market studies must be completed first. Mayor Bergeson asked if the first phase of development is contingent on the cooperation of the landowners of the second phase. Mr. Fefercorn stated the senior housing is driven by market need. comes in different types and is driven differently. The YMCA attract the retail development. retail development ahor and will Council Member Reinert asked if the City is inhibited. =s'e 2 putting all of the grant money into Phase 1. Economic Development, Ass tant 'e` "ine stated the City will be applying for more grant money for Phase 2. Shft �.,,; •` it is essential to put the current grant money into Phase 1 to get it off the grout Council Member O'Donnell noted that th ture ` e would like to discuss the risks, such as infrastructure, to the City if • ect anges in any way. Mr. Fefercorn advised increas significantly leverages the v without the development. Council Member D specifics regarding the study and consultants. affe the land values greatly. The YMCA e land. The City would not build the infrastructure o the Letter of Intent and stated she would like more eed or public assistance" and the cost to the City of a feasibility Economic Development Assistant Divine stated she cannot give an exact figure of those costs at this time. Those issues will come before the Council for approval. Council Member Dahl asked for more detail regarding the senior housing and asked if there are plans for assisted living units and/or more senior housing. Mr. Duffy stated the senior housing will consist of three levels with underground parking. Additional senior housing will depend on the market study. Assisted living units have been discussed. The City of Wyoming is offering assisted living at a much lower cost than the City of Lino Lakes can offer. Assisted living units will also depend on the market study. 2 • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 Mr. Fefercorn added that he cannot stress enough the need for a commitment from the YMCA. Economic Development Assistant Divine advised meetings have been held with the YMCA. Preliminary concepts should be available in 3 -4 weeks. This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, June 25, 2001, 6:30 p.m. Lino Lakes Marketplace EAW, Jeff Smyser — City Planner Smyser advised the EAW was distributed. The City has received one request for a copy. The deadline for public comment is 30 days after it was published. Council Member O'Donnell asked when the decision will be made regarding an EIS. City Planner Smyser advised the City should make decision about an EIS 30 days after the public comment period closed. Additional time can be reques Mayor Bergeson stated the Council will want a staff reco Tax Abatement & Business Subsidy Policies, Al Rol advised the City has begun the process to initiate tax ab City has to develop policies for business subsidy an participation in the tax abatement from the F At this time, the Forest Lake School Distric Task Force will address the issue of partL arding an EIS. Director Rolek eme' `or City projects. The batement. The City did request e Sc`` ool District and the County. want to participate. The County ax abatement on July 11, 2001. Economic Development Assistan uted and reviewed a draft copy of the Lino Lakes Business Subsidy P oti it is only a draft and will be revised. Mr. Jerry Shannon and M `'. a witt, Springsted, reviewed the Tax Abatement Policy City of Lino L es, nog he purpose of the policy is to establish the City of Lino Lakes position relatin • • of Tax Abatement for private development above and beyond the requirement : d limitations set forth by State Law. It was noted that the policy does include an a PO ication and scoring system. Council Member O'Donnell asked if tax abatement will be applicable to new businesses only. Finance Director Rolek advised tax abatement can also be used for existing businesses. Council Member Reinert asked if tax abatement or TIF is more beneficial to the City. Finance Director Rolek stated each project has to be evaluated individually. The City controls more dollars with the use of TIF. This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, July 23, 2001, 6:30 p.m. • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD UPDATE, SCOTT LANYON Mr. Scott Lanyon, Chair of the Environmental Board, gave the background of the development of the Board and the philosophies of the Board. He presented and reviewed the 2001 Goals of the Environmental Board noting the importance of developing a conservation development ordinance for the City. Mr. Lanyon stated it is the consensus of the Board that they are not helping the City of Lino Lakes as much as they would like to. He asked for feedback and suggestions to the 2001 Goals from the Council. Mayor Bergeson stated the Environmental Board is a relatively new board. The Council welcomes more discussions with the Board. Council Member Reinert asked if the Environmental Board has their concerns with the Planning and Zoning Board. Mr. Lanyon stated he has discussed the issue informal of the Planning and Zoning Board Members. He stated the Environmental oar. i s not feel that its recommendations have been a big part of the Plan r :n ' ± Zoning Board's discussions. Council Member Dahl noted that issue was 'sed a he last Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Mr. Lanyon stated the Board want •' ° "e environment is a part of every discussion and project. More e eeded relating to this issue. Council Member O'Donn d i fia _ e Environmental Board will be reviewing and making a recommendation o e EAW. Mr. Lanyon stated the : ill be reviewing the EAW but they do need adequate time to comments and make x^ ommendations. He noted one of the 2001 Goals includes educating the citizens of Lino Lakes about the environment. This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, June 25, 2001, 6:30 p.m. MOLIN CONCRETE UPDATE, JEFF SMYSER City Planner Smyser stated he conferred with Mr. Brixius regarding issues that were raised at the last Council work session. Mr. Brixius believes it was the intent to have both a berm and trees when the project was approved. However, the trees will not help the noise issues. The beeper restriction was intended to apply to the northern portion (20 acres) of the site only. Molin is addressing the issue of the variance of the beeper with OSHA. A letter was draft by City staff and will be sent tomorrow. He indicated the City is making progress on this issue. • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 Council Member Reinert stated that because the cost of the trees and sprinkler system is very high, there may be a better way to spend that money to eliminate the concerns of the neighbors. The problem will be solved if OSHA allows the beeper ban. He inquired about the liability of OSHA is an employee does get hurt while the beepers are not being used. Mr. Randy Molin, Molin Concrete, stated the company would develop a procedure for the beeper ban and employees would be retrained for the hours between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. He indicated he is comfortable with his employees not using the beepers. Mayor Bergeson stated the conditions of approval need to be enforced by the City or an application to change the conditions must be submitted. Mr. Molin indicated he will work with staff on the outstanding issues and changes in the conditions of approval to continue moving forward. WEST SHADOW PONDS, JEFF SMYSER City Planner Smyser distributed a copy of the prelimin for; 'est Shadow Ponds noting it went before the Planning and Zoning Board in 199: °'that time, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval. The p� a . sue is the road connection to 62nd Street and the traffic issues relating to th • : way. he current proposal is for a road to be constructed with a barricade at 6 d Stre nti162nd Street is reconstructed. There are currently no plans underway t• ec true 62nd Street. A petition was submitted from residents indicated su • for road connection. City Planner Smyser advised t w#'1 b r (4) actions necessary at the regular Council meeting: allocation g 1' es of MUSA reserve, rezone property to R1 -X, preliminary plat approval no bdivision of the remaining property. Mayor Bergeson aske ss s relating to the plat have been resolved. City Planner Smyser indicated all is s r ating to the preliminary plat have been resolved. City Engineer Powell advised reconstruction of 62nd Street will probably not occur until 2005. Council Member Dahl stated the plan has changed since it went before the Planning and Zoning Board relating to the number of lots and sewer and water issues. City Planner Smyser stated the plat has not changed since the Planning and Zoning Board approved it. If the property is rezoned sewer and water is no longer an issue. The City Ordinance does allow for a one -acre lot if it includes an existing home and remainder of the property is 10 acres. • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 Mr. Rick Carlson, Developer of West Shadow Ponds, advised he has an agreement with Mr. Rehbein relating to a one -acre lot and locating his sewer system. He stated he will stub the property. Council Member Dahl asked what happened to the cul -de -sac. City Planner Smyser stated a barricade will prevent traffic from going through until 62nd Street is improved and a temporary cul -de -sac is included. Council Member O'Donnell asked if there are any homes in the pipeline that will utilize West Shadow. City Planner Smyser indicated there a few homes that will use West Shadow. However, there are wetlands, farmland and a City park in that area. Council Member Dahl asked if the developer has worked with the neighbors on the trail and screening. City Planner Smyser advised the trail has been moved. Council Member Reinert stated the City needs to pursue the Ca ty regarding the installation of a stoplight where Birch Street meets West Sh advised he will research the County's plan regarding that City ngineer Powell Mr. Carlson noted ownership of the trail needs to b- trasferr Residents present expressed concern regardintype o . arrier that will be installed, traffic issues, safety issues, drainage issues, °5•il corio'tions of the area, elevations on the current plat, construction traffic, rezoni ® s s h ht of the new houses in relation to the existing houses, ponding issues + .x ed issues. Residents asked that these issues be considered when the Council vot Mr. Carlson advised he wo regarding drainage issues. development. He sta . d he development. He stat the Watershed District and Corp. of Engineers wil ` of be any additional water runoff from the t believe there will be an additional traffic from the only" signs can be installed on the local roadways. City Engineer Powell star d there has been no discussion regarding the construction traffic routing in the area. Traffic routing can be a condition of approval but it is difficult to enforce. He added he would prefer the construction traffic be on 62nd Street as it would be reconstructed shortly afterwards. Other residents present expressed support for the project but indicated they would prefer the roadway go through to 62nd Street. It was noted that the City will have the same problem when they try to take the barricade down at some point in the future. Mayor Bergeson stated the City may want to consider a disclosure requirement regarding the removal of the barricade to new homeowners. 6 • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 Council Member O'Donnell stated he does not prefer the barricade. He stated the land will be developed eventually. He indicated he is tying the improvements of 62nd Street and West Shadow together. He stated he does not believe he can support the plan until that issue has been resolved. Council Member Dahl stated she is in favor of the cul -de -sac due to safety issues on 62nd Street. She stated is concerned about the MUSA allocation and lack of MUSA in reserve. She stated there are many concerns from residents on both sides of the issue. Council Member Reinert stated the issues are privacy, traffic and wetlands. He stated it makes sense to put the road through but staff has advised it not go through because of the condition of 62nd Street. Mayor Bergeson stated he supports the project. He indicated he did support the barricade idea because it was a compromise. He stated he is disappointed th. e road improvements on end Street will not be done until 2005. Chief Pecchia noted the Police Department has had speed Shadow. Because of the speed violations, there will bra those neighborhoods. awthorne and West affic enforcement in This item will appear on the regular Council age` Mon ° 'ay, June 25, 2001, 6:30 p.m. Mayor Bergeson called for a short reces Mayor Bergeson reconvened the ELECTRICAL INSPECT CT, DAVE PECCHIA Chief Pecchia advised the Cis • f Lino Lakes and Suburban Inspections have completed the necessary paperw raw ewal of electrical inspection services. The contract renews effective July 1, 0 The new contract agreement is a two -(2) year contract for the period of July 1, 200 to July 1, 2003. The other changes include an increase in insurance coverage and service fees. There has not been in increase in service fees since 1996. Mayor Bergeson suggested the service fees be a separate action from the contract so they can be changed independently. This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, June 25, 2001, 6:30 p.m. SADDLE CLUB, JEFF SMYSER City Planner Smyser advised this application was originally scheduled for the June 11 Council meeting. The application was reviewed at the June 6 work session. At the work session Council directed staff to request a two -(2) week postponement from the applicant 7 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 for review time. The applicant agreed to postpone the project to the June 25 Council meeting. City Planner Smyser reminded the Council that staff is recommending approval of the application. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended denial but gave no reason. A reason for denial must be given at the time of denial if the Council denies the application. Mayor Bergeson stated Council Members must need to be prepared with Findings of Fact if the application is denied. City Planner Smyser noted the Environmental Board also approved the application based on recommendations. He briefly reviewed the staff analysis of the project noting the park dedication, utilities, and land use and zoning issues. Council Member Dahl asked if the Bisel Amendment will be in of the north. City Engineer Powell advised if a resident cannot su existing home, they will qualify for the Bisel Amendment. Mayor Bergeson stated he believes that if the utilities Birch Street, the utilities will be more expensive than for the residents to d there is an City Engineer Powell noted the Old Birch re .'tip`" id su about ten years ago. Council Member O'Donnell inquire Smyser stated there are 26 MUS 11 acres and this project is requ this time. he north/south of the east/west leg. mit a petition for utilities SA bank numbers. City Planner ank. West Shadow Ponds is requesting 8 a s. There are no other requests for MUSA at Mayor Bergeson stat-using the MUSA reserve may not be a good reason for denial of the application. Th going to have to deal w of MUSA within the City is another issue that the City is Council Member O'Donnell asked if there are any concerns from the residents to the north of the site. City Planner Smyser stated there are some homes to the north of the site. The backs of the houses will be on the development side of this project. Council Member Dahl stated the residents in that area do not want the road put in and/or want some type of screening installed. City Planner Smyser stated staff did look at the road configuration. There are wetland issues. It is possible to move the roadway down a bit to provide an area for screening. Mr. John Hill, Heritage Development, stated he has already purchased the right -of -way for the roadway. He indicated he is open to screening. 8 • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 Mayor Bergeson inquired about any City regulations relating to double frontage lots. City Planner Smyser stated the City has nothing that specifically addresses double frontage lots. The City prefers double frontage lots are not created. However, staff does want to see the roadway connection. City Engineer Powell stated 10 -12 double frontage lots were created in Wenzel Farms. Council Member O'Donnell stated the developer and the residents should come to an agreement about acceptable screening. Council Members did express concern regarding the lack of reasoning for the denial from the Planning and Zoning Board. It was suggested that the City possibly make that a requirement when receiving any recommendation from City Boards. Mr. John Kruman, Attorney for Mr. Hill, stated a major problem with the area is the MUSA line going right through the property. This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monda lu "', 5, ;001, 6:30 p.m. DISCUSS PLANNING & ZONING BOARD VACAN AN ESCH Administration Director Tesch distributed a mem Planning and Zoning Board vacancy. Four (4) app 'cation have been received and interviews need to be scheduled. eal Haglin regarding the Council directed staff to schedule in on July 9, 2001, 5:30 p.m. COMPREHENSIVE PLAIP Administration Direc on June 29, 2001, 7:0 e Planning and Zoning Board vacancy TE, DAN TESCH quired about the tentative Comprehensive Plan meeting Council directed staff to ' hedule and publish a special Council meeting on July 29, 2001, 7:00 a.m. Council Member O'Donnell stated he had a request to distribute the draft Comprehensive Plan on a diskette. Council Members determined the draft Comprehensive Plan can be distributed on a diskette subject to the approval from the City Administrator. DRAINAGE DITCH ON TOMAHAWK, JEFF O'DONNELL • Council Member O'Donnell inquired about the drainage ditch on Tomahawk. • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 19, 2001 City Engineer Powell advised there may be a way to eliminate the pond in that area. Elimination of the pond will be considered when staff makes a recommendation to Council in July. REGULAR AGENDA, JUNE 25, 2001 Letter of Intent for the Village Development — This item added to the agenda. Item 7D, FIRST READING, Ordinance 12 — 01, MUSA Reserve Allocation; FIRST READING, Ordinance 13 — 01, Rezoning; Resolution 01 — 84, Preliminary Plat; West Shadow Ponds — Request for Minor Subdivision was added to this item. Item 5B, Electrical Fee Schedule — This item was added to the agenda. The meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at t r _ ar •uncil meeting held on July 9, 2001. oiii3O T_Fau It ' Transcribed by: Kim Points TimeSaver Off Site Secre % nc. 10 erges• Mayor