Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/13/2001 Council Packet• AGENDA AMENDED CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday August 13, 2001 6:30 P.M. 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED MEETING Purpose: Discuss Pending Litigation - Call to Order and Roll Call: - Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) August 13, 2001 (Check No. 62477 through 62713 in the amount of $435,926.82) ii) Centennial Fire District B) Consider Block Party Application for Caribou Circle 2. Open Mike 3. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) Continuation of Public Hearing on Granting a Tax Abatement and Granting a Business Subsidy, Al Rolek 1) Consider Resolution No. 01 -106 (Lino Lakes Marketplace Request for Tax Abatement) 3/5 Vote 2) Consider Business Subsidy Agreement with Target/Kohl's 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consider Budgets for North Metro Telecommunications Commission and North Metro Media Center • B) Adopt Resolution 10 -118, Authorizing Cap on 2001 Franchise Fees Collected By Centennial Utilities From Customers Located in Lino Lakes AGENDA 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia III A) No Report • 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) No Report 7. Community Development Department Report A) Lino Lakes Marketplace 1) Ordinance No. 16 -01, Rezone for PDO, 4/5 Vote, Mike Grochala 2) Resolution 01 -107, Preliminary Plat Approval, 3/5 Vote, Mike Grochala B) Consider Resolution No. 01 -111, Entering a License Agreement with Anoka County for Use of Digital Parcel Base Map Database, Mike Grochala C) West Shadow Ponds — Jeff Smyser i. Resolution No. 01 -112, Minor Subdivision ii. Ordinance No. 13 -01, Rezoning To R -1X iii. Ordinance No. 12 -01, Allocating 11 Acres Of MUSA Reserve iv. Resolution No. 01 -113, Preliminary Plat D) Consider Resolution No. 01 -114, Order Preparation of Expanded Feasibility Report, Lino Lakes Marketplace Improvements (3/5 Vote Required) — John Powell E) Twilight Acres Sanitary Sewer Extension — John Powell i. Resolution No. 01 -115, Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications (3/5 Vote Required) ii. Resolution No. 01 -116, Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids (3/5 Vote Required) F) Consider Resolution No. 01 -117, Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract, 2001 Sealcoat Program (3/5 Vote Required) — John Powell 8. Unfinished Business A) July 9, 2001 City Council Minutes B) July 18, 2001 Work Session Minutes Page 2 AGENDA 9. New Business • 10. Community Calendar, August 14, 2001 through August 27, 2001: A) Wednesday, August 22, 2001, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session B) Monday, August 27, 2001, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 11. Adjourn Revised jmv 8/10/01 3:52 PM • • Page 3 • EXPENDITURES AUGUST 13, 2001 • • Date: 07/19/2001 Time: 12:05:06 CITY OF LINO LAKES Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1872 - 1872 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S Sort: N FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000016 JOE MEYER HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 239.09 239.09 .00 .00 000118 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, INC. 2 95.95 95.95 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 1 272.00 272.00 .00 .00 000191 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. 2 154.58 154.58 .00 .00 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 202.10 202.10 .00 .00 000223 SPRING LAKE PARK, CITY OF 1 534.50 534.50 .00 .00 000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 110.91 110.91 .00 .00 000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 55.93 55.93 .00 .00 000361 CRYSTAL CAVE, INC. 1 232.50 232.50 .00 .00 011111 ANOKA COUNTY 1 220.00 220.00 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 103.35 103.35 .00 .00 000558 BACCHUS HOMES, INC. 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 000697 KNISLEY CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000756 GONYEA HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000769 EXCELSIOR, CITY OF 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 000773 LANG, SUSAN & ETHAN 1 375.00 375.00 .00 .00 000774 HEAVENS, SARA 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 000775 COX GENERAL CONTRACTING 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000776 DUFFY, MIKE 1 26.00 26.00 .00 .00 000779 DAVID L. OLSON CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 • Date: 07/19/2001 Time: 12:05:11 Ve # Name CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000781 HOMES PLUS DESIGNERS 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 000782 HOPPE CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000783 J P MICHAELS CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000784 MATTICK, JEROME & PAMELA 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000785 MORGAN CHASE HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000786 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 1 36.00 36.00 .00 .00 000787 NEW CONCEPTS IN CUSTOM HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000788 RAY TETRAULT CONTRACTING 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000789 VENTURA HOMES 1 411.63 411.63 .00 .00 000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 7,034.50 7,034.50 .00 .00 001115 CHICILO HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 29.61 29.61 .00 .00 001280 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 23.43 23.43 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 895.53 895.53 .00 .00 001608 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY /INC 1 147.77 147.77 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 100.56 100.56 .00 .00 00 GOA COMPANY, INC. 1 678.97 678.97 .00 .00 001771 HALVORSON CONCRETE, INC. 1 7,723.00 7,723.00 .00 .00 001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 494.05 494.05 .00 .00 001932 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1 3,866.69 3,866.69 .00 .00 001981 INTEGRA HOMES, INC. 1 334.64 334.64 .00 .00 002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 377.00 377.00 .00 .00 002152 KLOSNER - GOERTZ 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002208 LELS 1 132.00 132.00 .00 .00 002245 LANG BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002467 MAC MAY HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 127.64 127.64 .00 .00 • Date: 07/19/2001 Time: 12:05:18 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Ve•# Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002691 MIKE TORKELSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002836 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 1 9,527.93 9,527.93 .00 .00 003091 MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1 264.00 264.00 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 687.29 687.29 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 1,959.43 1,959.43 .00 .00 003320 NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 3 7,203.96 7,203.96 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 508.14 508.14 .00 .00 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 14,272.36 14,272.36 .00 .00 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 657.59 657.59 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 31.63 31.63 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 1,445.85 1,445.85 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 8,898.03 8,898.03 .00 .00 004342 T & D HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 004388 TEAMSTER LOCAL 320 1 738.40 738.40 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 1 125.00 125.00 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 9,864.79 9,864.79 .00 .00 00. VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 1 921.00 921.00 .00 .00 004798 WELCH LANDSCAPING ROCK 1 63.90 63.90 .00 .00 004836 WOOD, SANDIE 1 16.32 16.32 .00 .00 005029 NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA 1 6,872.30 6,872.30 .00 .00 900058 HANSON BUILDERS, INC. 3 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 900076 PROCRAFT HOMES, INC. 3 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 900224 NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS 4 2,000.00 2,000.00 .00 .00 900436 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. 2 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 .00 900440 STERLING HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900524 BURGER, LUANN 1 95.00 95.00 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 1 151.39 151.39 .00 .00 • Grand Totals: 91 106,489.24 106,489.24 .00 .00* Date: 08/02/2001 Time: 14:00:07 CITY OF LINO LAKES Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1886 - 1886 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 480.64 480.64 .00 .00 000115 KRAUS- ANDERSON 1 29,990.00 29,990.00 .00 .00 000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #14 1 546.56 546.56 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 897.06 897.06 .00 .00 000526 SHADE TREE CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 50.53 50.53 .00 .00 000595 HOGSTAD, LISA 1 285.09 285.09 .00 .00 000604 RYLANDER, VERNON 1 88.90 88.90 .00 .00 000611 MURPHY'S LANDING, HISTORIC 1 145.00 145.00 .00 .00 000736 WAGAMON BUILDERS 1 475.00 475.00 .00 .00 000791 AUST CONSTRUCTION 1 7,750.00 7,750.00 .00 .00 0• HENINEN, MIKE & BATES, SARAH 1 475.00 475.00 .00 .00 000793 BRASKET, DENIS & SARA 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000794 C.I., LLC 1 8,940.00 8,940.00 .00 .00 000795 CHRISTOFERSEN, GAYE 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000796 EMILY, MARVIN 1 350.00 350.00 .00 .00 000797 FUECHTMANN, DONNA 1 59.00 59.00 .00 .00 000798 GUPTIL CONTRACTING 1 620.00 620.00 .00 .00 000799 HUTTON & ROWE 1 144.50 144.50 .00 .00 000801 LUND, MICHAEL 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 000802 MATTSON, RENEE 1 102.00 102.00 .00 .00 000803 MANNING, GREG & JENNY 1 475.00 475.00 .00 .00 1 ' Date: 08/02/2001 Time: 14:00:14 CITY OF LINO LAKES + e FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount 11111 # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000804 PLOMBON, SUE 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000805 REHBEIN, TAMMY 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 000806 SCOTT JASON HOMES 1 475.00 475.00 .00 .00 000807 SIGFRED, ANDY 1 305.00 305.00 .00 .00 000808 SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL 1 120.00 120.00 .00 .00 000809 TAYLORS FALLS 1 180.00 180.00 .00 .00 000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 2 23,331.06 23,331.06 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 362.25 362.25 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 2 630.93 630.93 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 2,696.20 2,696.20 .00 .00 001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 710.47 710.47 .00 .00 001932 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1 3,866.69 3,866.69 .00 .00 002245 LANG BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002410 LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB 1 400.00 400.00 .00 .00 002517 MEADOW VIEW HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002540 MEDICA 1 21,026.30 21,026.30 .00 .00 011, MORTENSON, STEVEN 1 328.19 328.19 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 548.29 548.29 .00 .00 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 14,707.01 14,707.01 .00 .00 003757 REMEMBER ME FLORAL & GIFTS, INC. 2 110.23 110.23 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 3 530.43 530.43 .00 .00 004040 SMITH, PEG 1 92.11 92.11 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 23.38 23.38 .00 .00 004350 T.K.D.A. 1 156.48 156.48 .00 .00 004671 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 1,036.33 1,036.33 .00 .00 004711 VALLEY FAIR 1 506.25 506.25 .00 .00 900139 KLEHR, DAVE 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 54 126,756.88 126,756.88 .00 .00* Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:34:34 CITY OF LINO LAKES • FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (r) 1905 - 1905 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: s Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 2 72.52 72.52 .00 .00 000051 A T & T 1 45.68 45.68 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 455.94 455.94 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 195.41 195.41 .00 .00 000112 CHIEF SUPPLY, INC. 1 53.96 53.96 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 1 160.00 160.00 .00 .00 000191 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. 4 193.46 193.46 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 3 100.61 100.61 .00 .00 000225 WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH, INC. 1 28.96 28.96 .00 .00 000247 ARMORED FIRE GUN SHOP /RANGE, INC. 1 59.91 59.91 .00 .00 000250 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 1 49.50 49.50 .00 .00 0 HECHTEL, JEFF 1 31.00 31.00 .00 .00 000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 110.91 110.91 .00 .00 000354 SWENSON, DAVE 1 27.00 27.00 .00 .00 000366 ORIENTIAL TRADING COMPANY, INC. 1 122.10 122.10 .00 .00 000453 ROSVOLD, RICK 1 31.00 31.00 .00 .00 000458 TORGERSON, RICHARD 1 15.50 15.50 .00 .00 000465 MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTECH GROUP 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00 000526 SHADE TREE CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 1,158.78 1,158.78 .00 .00 000617 MICRO WAREHOUSE 1 191.51 191.51 .00 .00 000634 DNR SCREEN PRINTING, INC. 1 65.60 65.60 .00 .00 • Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:34:40 Name CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 52.33 52.33 .00 .00 000675 BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, INC. 1 45.17 45.17 .00 .00 000693 HAGLIN, NEAL 1 400.00 400.00 .00 .00 000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 1,934.75 1,934.75 .00 .00 000733 P C COLLOVA BUILDERS 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000780 BRAD RAGAN, INC. 1 1,040.75 1,040.75 .00 .00 000810 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .00 000811 BOETTNER, BILL 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000812 BROWN, BERK 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000813 BOEHNE, BRAD 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000814 COTHRON, SHANE 1 15.50 15.50 .00 .00 000815 EBELING, TIM 1 31.00 31.00 .00 .00 000816 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 1 2,729.72 2,729.72 .00 .00 000817 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 273.04 273.04 .00 .00 000818 GENTILINI, STEVE 1 31.00 31.00 .00 .00 000819 GRONE, SHERI 1 27.00 27.00 .00 .00 0 HOCH, ELI 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000822 HOFMANN, JOHN 1 15.50 15.50 .00 .00 000823 HARRELL, MIKE 1 15.50 15.50 .00 .00 000824 HARTHORN, DAVID 1 31.00 31.00 .00 .00 000825 JENSEN, STEPHANIE 1 31.00 31.00 .00 .00 000828 KUZEL, RANDY 1 27.00 27.00 .00 .00 000829 LASCH, SUSAN 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000831 MANN, PAT 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000832 MCKINNEY, KEVIN 1 27.00 27.00 .00 .00 000834 REISDORFER, RYAN 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 000835 SCHWART, BOB 1 13.50 13.50 .00 .00 • Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:34:44 CITY OF LINO LAKES • # Name FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000836 SCHMITTDIEL, PETE 1 31.00 31.00 000837 TANK REND /RADIATOR WEST 1 140.75 140.75 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 820.15 820.15 000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 305.23 305.23 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 2 212.24 212.24 000960 CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC. 1 5.10 5.10 001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 1 7,748.30 7,748.30 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 34.00 34.00 001117 CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE 1 500.00 500.00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 3,492.90 3,492.90 001193 C M S HOLDINGS, INC. 1 7,796.05 7,796.05 001255 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 1 66.90 66.90 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 237.50 237.50 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 473.97 473.97 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 4 5,678.57 5,678.57 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 6,834.74 6,834.74 103 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 896.36 896.36 001630 GOA COMPANY, INC. 1 252.54 252.54 001680 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 1 497.60 497.60 001709 GRAFFCO, INC. 1 320.58 320.58 001814 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER, INC. 1 101.72 101.72 001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 100.34 100.34 002110 KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. 1 836.28 836.28 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 123.31 123.31 002320 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST 1 1,017.00 1,017.00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS 1 279.19 279.19 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 1,634.46 1,634.46 • .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Date: 08/07/2001 • Time: 13:34:55 CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 4 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Discount V # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 1 35.36 35.36 .00 .00 002900 MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY 1 12.50 12.50 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 1 1,295.03 1,295.03 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 2,951.87 2,951.87 .00 .00 003300 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LANDSCAPING 1 16,975.69 16,975.69 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 216.77 216.77 .00 .00 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 100.44 100.44 .00 .00 003452 PERA /COUNCIL 1 189.92 189.92 .00 .00 003491 PETTY CASH 1 63.50 63.50 .00 .00 003492 PETTY CASH 1 228.31 228.31 .00 .00 003500 PHOTO WORLD, INC. 1 102.05 102.05 .00 .00 003508 PINKERTON SERVICE GROUP, INC. 1 120.00 120.00 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY BOWES 4 737.60 737.60 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 798.00 798.00 .00 .00 003620 PRINTERS SERVICE, INC. 1 26.75 26.75 .00 .00 OS S. J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 110,808.76 110,808.76 .00 .00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00 004142 STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO, INC. 1 557.18 557.18 .00 .00 004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 367.20 367.20 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 204.60 204.60 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 2,197.42 2,197.42 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 4,616.17 4,616.17 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 211.03 211.03 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 5 1,950.00 1,950.00 .00 .00 004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 1 64.91 64.91 .00 .00 004730 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 1 332.95 332.95 .00 .00 • Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:35:06 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 5 Discount Veg�Qr # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004798 WELCH LANDSCAPING ROCK 1 63.90 63.90 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 222.45 222.45 .00 .00 005015 NORTH METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 240.00 240.00 .00 .00 900060 DAY- TIMERS, INC. 1 55.61 55.61 .00 .00 900174 KELLEY, JEFF 1 15.50 15.50 .00 .00 900440 STERLING HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900448 GEPHART ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 3,980.00 3,980.00 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 2 284.39 284.39 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 129 202,680.70 202,680.70 .00 .00* • • Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:47:36 • Operator: JAL Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 62554 AFSCME COUNCIL #14 62479 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A 62555 AUST CONSTRUCTION 62481 BACCHUS HOMES, INC. 62482 BEAVENS, SARA O BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, 0 BOEHNE, BRAD 0 BOETTNER, BILL 62556 BRASKET, DENIS & SARA 0 BROWN, BERK 62557 C.I., LLC 62485 CHICILO HOMES 62558 CHRISTOFERSEN, GAYE O COTHRON, SHANE 62487 COX GENERAL CONTRACTIN 62490 DAVID L. OLSON CONSTRU 62561 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 62492 DUFFY, MIKE 0 EBELING, TIM 62562 EMILY, MARVIN 62564 FUECHTMANN, DONNA 0 GENTILINI, STEVE O GEPHART ELECTRIC COMPA 62496 GONYEA HOMES, INC. 0 GRONE, SHERI 62565 GUPTIL CONTRACTING 62498 HANSON BUILDERS, INC. O HARRELL, MIKE 0 HARTHORN, DAVID 4106 0 HECHTEL, JEFF 6 HENINEN, MIKE & BATES, 0 HOCH, ELI O HOFMANN, JOHN 65224 M HOGSTAD, LISA 62500 HOMES BY JAMES, INC. 62501 HOMES PLUS DESIGNERS 62502 HOPPE CONSTRUCTION 62567 HUTTON & ROWE 62504 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCI 62568 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCI 62506 INTEGRA HOMES, INC. 62507 INTL UNION OF OPER ENG 62508 J P MICHAELS CONSTRUCT O JENSEN, STEPHANIE 62509 JOE MEYER HOMES O KELLEY, JEFF 62569 KLEHR, DAVE 62510 KLOSNER - GOERTZ 62511 KNISLEY CONSTRUCTION 62570 KRAUS- ANDERSON 0 KUZEL, RANDY • PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 546.56 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 202.10 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2290 7 * * * * * * ** 7,750.00 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6601 L * * * * * * ** 1,000.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 55.00 GRILL RENTAL * * * * * * ** 45.17 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 13.50 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1115 S * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /7826 M * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 13.50 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /7090 2 * * * * * * ** 8,940.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6538 L * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 50.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 15.50 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2295 A * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2248 T * * * * * * ** 500.00 DENTAL INSURANCE * * * * * * ** 1,530.05 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 26.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 31.00 REIMBURSE ESCROW /VARIANC * * * * * * ** 350.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 59.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 31.00 LIGHT POLE * * * * * * ** 3,480.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2260 T * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 27.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /500 AP * * * * * * ** 620.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2324 I * * * * * * ** 1,500.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 15.50 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 31.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 31.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6574 A * * * * * * ** 475.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 13.50 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 15.50 PICNIC SUPPLIES * * * * * * ** 285.09 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1192 D * * * * * * ** 1,000.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6579 C * * * * * * ** 1,000.00 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6725 T * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMBURSE PLUMBING PERMI * * * * * * ** 144.50 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 3,866.69 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 3,866.69 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6602 L * * * * * * ** 334.64 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 377.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6587 L * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 31.00 REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6692 B * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 15.50 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1555 S * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6544 D * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /120 GR * * * * * * ** 500.00 REIMB BLDG ESCROW /725 MA * * * * * * ** 29,990.00 REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 27.00 Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:47:37 Operator: JAL " • • Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 62512 62571 62513 0 62514 62573 62515 0 62574 62517 62575 0 62576 62578 62519 62520 62521 62522 62525 62526 62527 0 0 62530 62581 62582 62531 62533 84 0 586 0 0 0 62590 62591 0 62592 0 62538 0 62540 62542 0 62546 62600 62601 • Description Dept Amount LANG BUILDERS, INC. LANG BUILDERS, INC. LANG, SUSAN & ETHAN LASCH, SUSAN LELS LUND, MICHAEL MAC MAY HOMES MANN, PAT MANNING, GREG & JENNY MATTICK, JEROME & PAME MATTSON, RENEE MCKINNEY, KEVIN MEADOW VIEW HOMES MEDICA MIKE TORKELSON DEVELOP MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE MINNESOTA STATE TREASU MORGAN CHASE HOMES, IN NEW CONCEPTS IN CUSTOM NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT P C COLLOVA BUILDERS PERA /COUNCIL PERA /REGULAR PERA /REGULAR PLOMBON, SUE PROCRAFT HOMES, INC. RAY TETRAULT CONTRALTI REHBEIN, TAMMY REISDORFER, RYAN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN ROSVOLD, RICK SCHMITTDIEL, PETE SCHWART, BOB SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL SCOTT JASON HOMES SHADE TREE CONSTRUCTIO SHADE TREE CONSTRUCTIO STERLING HOMES, INC. STERLING HOMES, INC. SWENSON, DAVE T & D HOMES TEAMSTER LOCAL 320 TORGERSON, RICHARD VENTURA HOMES WAGAMON BUILDERS REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6701 T * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1507 S * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6728 2 * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /600 LO * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6324 C REIMB BLDG ESCROW /673 LO RIEMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6208 S * * * * * * ** MEDICAL INSURANCE * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2219 T PAYROLL WITHHOLDING SURCHARGE REIMS BLDG ESCROW /1137 H REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6631 L REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6549 D TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6200 L PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC RIEMB BLDG ESCROW /6608 L REIMS BLDG ESCROW /816 CO REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC LIFE INSURANCE REIMBURSE PROGRAM AEC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1385 T * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /646 LO REIMB BLDG ESCROW /692 LO REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6619 L REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2212 C REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMS BLDG ESCROW /2248 L PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6560 C * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6543 C * * * * * * ** WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** 0 CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE PROGRAM REC /GOLF 500.00 500.00 375.00 13.50 132.00 60.00 500.00 13.50 475.00 500.00 102.00 27.00 500.00 5,411.81 500.00 264.00 9,527.93 500.00 500.00 2,000.00 5,334.41 500.00 189.92 14,272.36 14,707.01 70.00 1,500.00 500.00 60.00 13.50 634.46 31.00 31.00 13.50 120.00 475.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 27.00 500.00 738.40 15.50 411.63 475.00 346.80 139,173.22* ADULT IN 500.00 Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:47:39 Operator: JAL Check # Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 PERA /REGULAR OMITTED DEDUCTION Total for Dept 201 0 DNR SCREEN PRINTING, I PRINTING SERVICE Total for Dept 202 O PERA /REGULAR OMITTED DEDUCTION Total for Dept 203 O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES Total for Dept 204 O BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE /SUPPLIES 62488 CRYSTAL CAVE, INC. PROGRAM REC O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES 62580 MURPHY'S LANDING, HIST ADMISSION /PROGRAM REC 0 ORIENTIAL TRADING COMP SUPPLIES 62537 SPRING LAKE PARK, CITY PROGRAM REC 62597 TAYLORS FALLS CANOE RENTAL /PROGRAM 62598 VALLEY FAIR PROGRAM REC /ADMISSION Total for Dept 205 ADULT IN 92.98 592.98* ADULT SP 65.60 65.60* FAMILY A 7.46 7.46* OTHER 86.34 86.34* SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL REC SPECIAL SPECIAL 0 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN SUPPLIES 62478 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN SUPPLIES 62483 BURGER, LUANN DANCE LESSONS O IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING SERVICE 0 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES 0 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, PYLONS /MARKERS /CHAIN /SHI 111, 8 NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA PROGRAM REC O PETTY CASH FILING FEE /SUPPLIES O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING 62534 SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES 62593 SIGFRED, ANDY REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 62545 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. PHOTOS Total for Dept 207 O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING Total for Dept 208 62560 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF FLOWERS O NORTH METRO CHAMBER OF MEMBERSHIP /COUNCIL 62587 REMEMBER ME FLORAL & G FLORAL ARRANGEMENT 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 18/23 Total for Dept 401 62553 A T & T WIRELESS O D.C.A. INC. 62561 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF 62420 M EXCELSIOR, CITY OF 62563 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC • MONTHLY SERVICE FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI M DENTAL INSURANCE MEETING /J VIGER . LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 305.23 232.50 18.77 145.00 122.10 534.50 180.00 506.25 2,044.35* YOUTH IN 160.00 YOUTH IN 272.00 YOUTH IN 95.00 YOUTH IN 78.86 YOUTH IN 36.97 YOUTH IN 1,634.46 YOUTH IN 6,872.30 YOUTH IN 15.54 YOUTH IN 261.00 YOUTH IN 472.99 YOUTH IN 305.00 YOUTH IN 921.00 11,125.12* YOUTH SP 261.00 261.00* MAYOR /CO 39.58 MAYOR /CO 240.00 MAYOR /CO 44.73 MAYOR /CO 1,219.50 1,543.81* ADMINIST 27.26 ADMINIST 237.50 ADMINIST 112.90 ADMINIST 25.00 ADMINIST 60.81 Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:47:39 Operator: JAL • • Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O HAGLIN, NEAL STIPEND /CONTRACT END 62578 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 62523 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCI MEMBERSHIP /J VIGER O PINKERTON SERVICE GROU DRUG TESTING O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 62535 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI MOUSE O STAR TRIBUNE, INC. ADVERTISING Total for Dept 402 ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 9 /JULY 12 CHARTER 62601 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR CHARTER Total for Dept 405 62553 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE 62561 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 62563 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 62594 SMITH, PEG MILEAGE Total for Dept 406 0 C M S HOLDINGS, INC. MAINTENANCE 62561 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 62563 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY 62578 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 407 SENIORS SENIORS INS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS FINANCE FINANCE INS FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE 400.00 632.53 36.00 120.00 144.00 16.00 31.63 367.20 2,210.83* 125.00 102.00 227.00* 29.56 46.60 4.05 4.00 92.11 176.32* 5,886.15 55.26 40.14 425.00 14.00 6,420.55* III/1 01 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR LEGAL CO 21,872.46 Total for Dept 414 62561 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC 62563 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ECONOMIC 62578 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ECONOMIC Total for Dept 415 62561 62563 62578 62527 62586 62596 0 0 62561 62563 62578 • DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. MEDICA NORTHWEST RELIASTAR T.K.D.A. TIMESAVER ASST CONSULT LIFE INSURAN OFF -SITE SEC DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS MEDICAL INSURANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIFE INSURANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES JULY 11 /JULY 18 Total for Dept 416 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSO DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. MEDICA PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING DUES /MIKE G Communit DENTAL INSURANCE Communit LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Communit MEDICAL INSURANCE Communit 21,872.46* 44.20 26.88 207.53 8.00 286.61* 22.10 12.09 207.53 1,869.55 4.00 156.48 355.50 2,627.25* 49.50 88.44 52.64 425.00 Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:47:40 Operator: JAL • • Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 418 0 0 0 0 0 0 62561 62563 0 0 62578 0 0 62579 0 0 62586 62587 0 0 62595 0 62599 ARMORED FIRE GUN SHOP/ C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CHIEF SUPPLY, INC. CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CONNEXUS ENERGY CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. MEDICA MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTEC MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFE MORTENSON, STEVEN PETTY CASH PHOTO WORLD, INC. RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN REMEMBER ME FLORAL & SHRED -IT, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, VERIZON WIRELESS SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES TOWELS /GLOVES STAMPS MONTHLY SERVICE UNIFORM SUPPLIES DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES PARTS /SUPPLIES MEDICAL INSURANCE JUNE USAGE SEIZED VEHICLE TITLE REIMBURSE DUES /LODGING PARTS /SUPPLIES /PARKING PHOTO FINISHING LIFE INSURANCE G FUNERAL SPRAY DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL UNIFORM SUPPLIES UNIFORM SUPPLIES IN UNIFORM SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 Communit POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE MAT POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FIRE 63 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FIRE ‚61 78 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FIRE 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FIRE Total for Dept 421 62561 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 62563 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 62578 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 62588 RYLANDER, VERNON REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW 0 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 62539 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Total for Dept 422 0 62553 0 62484 0 62561 62563 • A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, A T & T WIRELESS AMERICAN FASTENER & SU C. W. HOULE, INC. CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING SOD STREETS MONTHLY SERVICE STREETS SUPPLIES STREETS CONTRACTOR /MISC REPAIR STREETS MONTHLY SERVICE STREETS DENTAL INSURANCE STREETS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS STREETS Amount 8.00 623.58* 59.91 154.13 53.96 34.00 10.65 66.90 359.00 254.46 18.91 836.28 7,570.42 37.00 12.50 328.19 231.81 102.05 100.00 65.50 54.95 204.60 23.38 64.91 1,036.33 11,679.84* 39.78 20.57 765.00 8.00 833.35* 66.30 30.40 1,057.53 10.60 88.90 2,197.42 1,445.85 4,897.00* 52.39 82.90 13.56 7,034.50 498.97 88.41 54.42 Date: 08/07/2001 • Time: 13:47:40 Operator: JAL Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES 62497 HALVORSON CONCRETE, IN CURB /GUTTER /SIDEWALD /SPI 0 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER, SURVEY STAKES 62578 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN O T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS 62541 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS 0 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS O XCEL ENERGY 62550 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE IN ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE ASPHALT ASPHALT BATTERIES /EAR PLUGS /JACK MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 430 0 0 0 0 0 62561 62563 0 62494 0 62495 0 0 0 0 16 578 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU SUPPLIES BRAD RAGAN, INC. TIRE REPAIR BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. PARTS /SUPPLIES CAPITOL CITY WELDING, WELDING SUPPLIES DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DIESEL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY PARTS /SUPPLIES CLEANER OIL /DRUM OIL /ANTI- FREEZE FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I GOA COMPANY, INC. GOA COMPANY, INC. GRAFFCO, INC. FUEL PUMP PARTS HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES LEAGUE OF MN CITIES IN ANNUAL PAY PLAN MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, IN SWEEPER PARTS MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, IN DEFLECTOR MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 PETTY CASH FILING FEE /SUPPLIES O PRINTERS SERVICE, INC. VERMEER CHIPPER KNIVES 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 62536 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, IN STRIP REMOVAL O STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO, PARTS #231 O TANK RENU /RADIATOR WES SEAL TANK /WASTE DISPOSAL O THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH PARTS /SUPPLIES O WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH, VEHICLE LOCK /KEYS 0 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. DRILL /BUSH GALV Total for Dept 431 INS 0 0 0 62477 62480 0 0 62559 • A T & T ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF STREETS 67.04 STREETS 6,841.00 STREETS 101.72 STREETS 622.59 STREETS 8.84 STREETS 87.00 STREETS 23.40 STREETS 4,616.17 STREETS 8,898.03 STREETS 188.65 STREETS 2,951.87 STREETS 175.38 32,406.84* FLEET 87.05 FLEET 1,040.75 FLEET 820.15 FLEET 5.10 FLEET 5,678.57 FLEET 22.10 FLEET 11.01 FLEET 120.84 FLEET 100.56 FLEET 252.54 FLEET 678.97 FLEET 320.58 FLEET 72.16 FLEET 1,017.00 FLEET 193.46 FLEET 154.58 FLEET 425.00 FLEET 16.46 FLEET 26.75 FLEET 4.60 FLEET 95.95 FLEET 557.18 FLEET 140.75 FLEET 211.03 FLEET 28.96 FLEET 217.31 12,299.41* MONTHLY SERVICE GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE GOVERNME INSTALL SHOP LIGHT SWITC GOVERNME POWER TO WARMING HOUSE /C GOVERNME MAT RENTAL GOVERNME OFFICE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE BILLING MONTHLY SERVICE 45.68 314.37 195.41 239.09 55.93 GOVERNME 58.11 GOVERNME 7,748.30 GOVERNME 570.93 Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:47:41 Operator: JAL • • Page: 7 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 62486 0 62489 0 0 62563 0 62493 0 62497 62578 0 0 62529 0 0 0 62532 62586 62534 0 62548 0 62553 0 0 1101559 62561 62563 0 0 62503 62578 62518 Description Dept Amount CONNEXUS ENERGY CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC DALCO, INC. DALCO, INC. DAY - TIMERS, INC. FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCT GEPHART ELECTRIC COMPA HALVORSON CONCRETE, IN MEDICA MICRO WAREHOUSE OFFICEMAX, INC. OFFICEMAX, INC. PETTY CASH PITNEY BOWES QWEST QWEST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SAM'S CLUB, INC. WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES /BARRY B PUSH BUTTON LOCKS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES LIGHT POLE CURB /GUTTER /SIDEWALD /SPI MEDICAL INSURANCE TONER OFFICE OFFICE FILING TAPE MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES Total for Dept 432 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FEE /SUPPLIES A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, A T & T WIRELESS ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, L CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA MEDICA METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, 0 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 0 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. NATURE CALLS, INC. 62524 0 62583 62586 0 0 62547 62601 62549 • SOD MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE ATHLETIC COMPLEX DESIGN/ MONTHLY SERVICE DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES POLE SAW MEDICAL INSURANCE MARKING PAINT MONTHLY SERVICE PARTS /SUPPLIES PORTABLE RESTROOMS QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS BATTERIES /EAR PLUGS /JACK WELCH LANDSCAPING ROCK WOODCHIPS WELCH LANDSCAPING ROCK WOODCHIPS WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR WOOD, SANDIE MILEAGE Total for Dept 450 GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS 1,512.57 284.39 99.63 473.97 29.61 55.61 2,729.72 6.94 174.67 147.77 500.00 882.00 425.00 191.51 216.77 508.14 28.00 737.60 1,107.85 65.24 4.00 147.47 110.91 110.91 19,778.10* 20.13 104.11 141.57 75.00 20.42 121.59 53.64 163.44 28.18 494.05 1,487.50 127.64 8.84 1,295.03 687.29 50.93 50.53 22.00 72.15 63.90 63.90 550.80 16.32 5,718.96* Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:47:43 Operator: JAL M • Page: 8 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 62553 0 62486 62561 62563 0 0 62578 0 0 62586 62534 Description Dept Amount A T & T WIRELESS BERNSTEIN, BARRY CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MRPA RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SAM'S CLUB, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATI MILEAGE RECREATI OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATI DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RECREATI PARTS /SUPPLIES RECREATI PRINTING SERVICE RECREATI MEDICAL INSURANCE RECREATI MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATI REGISTRATION /LIZ B RECREATI LIFE INSURANCE RECREATI SUPPLIES RECREATI Total for Dept 451 62543 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 6 PARK BOA Total for Dept 452 62553 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM 62563 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ENVIRONM 62578 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ENVIRONM 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 18/23 ENVIRONM Total for Dept 461 62563 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SOLID WA 62572 LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB RECYCLING DAY SOLID WA 62578 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE SOLID WA 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SOLID WA 111/1 89 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL SOLID WA Total for Dept 462 62563 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FORESTRY 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES FORESTRY 62578 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FORESTRY 62586 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FORESTRY Total for Dept 463 62553 0 0 62552 0 62491 62561 0 62563 0 0 0 62499 • A T & T WIRELESS BLAINE, CITY OF C M S HOLDINGS, INC. M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CONNEXUS ENERGY DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN MONTHLY SERVICE WATER UTILITY BILLING WATER MAINTENANCE WATER UTILITY BILLING WATER MONTHLY SERVICE WATER BATTERY /SWITCH WATER DENTAL INSURANCE WATER SUPPLIES WATER LONG TERM DISABILITY INS WATER PARTS /SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE CHEMICALS CHLORINE WATER WATER WATER WATER 100.82 52.33 51.76 26.52 29.93 36.40 200.33 292.53 8.84 60.00 12.80 37.13 909.39* 125.00 125.00* 28.08 5.73 191.25 1.80 250.00 476.86* 1.27 400.00 42.50 .40 530.43 974.60* 5.72 67.05 191.25 1.80 265.82* 107.91 593.75 954.95 181.12 1,291.18 23.43 36.48 273.04 19.90 229.24 248.80 6,834.74 895.53 Date: 08/07/2001 Time: 13:47:46 Operator: JAL • Check # Page: CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 62505 WATER SAMPLES 62578 MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 MONTHLY SERVICE 62532 MONTHLY SERVICE 62586 LIFE INSURANCE 62544 MIU 0 BATTERIES /EAR PLUGS /JACK 0 DRILL /BUSH GALV 62550 MONTHLY SERVICE 62602 MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 494 0 0 62552 M 0 62561 62563 0 62578 0 62586 0 62550 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. QWEST RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. XCEL ENERGY XCEL ENERGY BLAINE, CITY OF C M S HOLDINGS, INC. CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, MEDICA MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. XCEL ENERGY UTILITY BILLING MAINTENANCE UTILITY BILLING MONTHLY SERVICE M DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY MONTHLY SERVICE MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE DRILL /BUSH GALV MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 495 WATER 70.00 WATER 323.18 WATER 4.42 WATER 38.11 WATER 9.60 WATER 9,864.79 WATER 72.15 WATER 2.57 WATER 294.44 WATER 548.29 22,917.62* SEWER 1,341.00 SEWER 954.95 SEWER 181.13 SEWER 179.53 SEWER 36.47 INS SEWER 19.87 SEWER 248.80 SEWER 323.15 SEWER 4.42 SEWER 9.60 SEWER 2.57 SEWER 1,489.61 4,791.10* 62421 M ANOKA COUNTY TRAIL TAXES O NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LA MARSHAN PARK IRRIGATION O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING O S. J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTI CONTRACTOR /MAIN STREET T OTHER 01 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL /CRIMINAL ATTOR OTHER Total for Dept 499 • OTHER 220.00 OTHER 16,975.69 OTHER 45.00 110,808.76 459.00 128,508.45* Grand Total 435,926.82* Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax August 3, 2001 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12782 — 12802, in the amount of $5,626.25 is hereby requested. DATE CHECK# NAME 08/03/2001 12782 08/03/2001 12783 08/03/2001 12784 08/03/2001 12785 08/03/2001 12786 08/03/2001 12787 08/03/2001 12788 08/03/2001 12789 08/03/2001 12790 08/03/2001 12791 08/03/2001 12792 08/03/2001 12793 08/03/2001 12794 08/03/2001 12795 08/03/2001 12796 08/03/2001 12797 08/03/2001 12798 08/03/2001 12799 08/03/2001 12800 08/03/2001 12801 08/03/2001 12802 Centennial Fire District Check Register Alex Air Apparatus, Inc. Centennial Utilites Circle Pines Office Products Clarey's Safety Equipment, Inc. Comfort Plus Heating and Cooling Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Grainger Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator Medtronic Physio - Control Milo Bennett Minnesota Department of Economic Security Mobile Radio Engineering, Inc. Nat'l Imprint/Franklin Products Northland Fire & Security, Inc. Susan Booth Verizon Wireless Viking Office Products Zep Manufacturing Company City of Lino Lakes Timothy WeIle Rolltex Computers ACCOUNT 42130 42251 42180 42130 42110 42000 42130 42110 42260 42180 42280 42130 42190 42110 42280 42240 42180 42230 45010 45010 42130 Total - Equipment Expense - Station 1 - Gas - Office Supplies - Equipment Expense - Other Maintenance - Vehicle Maintenance - Equipment Expense - Other Maintenance - Medical Supplies - Office Supplies - Miscellaneous Expense - Equipment Expense - Fire Prevention Supplies - Other Maintenance - Miscellaneous Expense - Telephone Expense - Office Supplies - Cleaning Supplies - Safety Camp Expense - Safety Camp Expense - Equipment Expense Page 1 of 1 AMOUNT 135.23 161.09 12.32 110.00 86.00 400.99 91.16 8.57 664.04 623.71 14.59 1,633.20 393.73 15.00 143.00 242.84 85.51 171.98 251.60 10.00 371,69 $5,626.25 s AGENDA ITEM 1B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jean Viger DATE: August 13, 2001 TOPIC: Consideration of an Application for a Block Party, Caribou Circle VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: Attached to this agenda item is a request to hold a block party in the Cul -de -sac, Caribou Circle, on September 15, 2001 starting at 5:00 p.m. and ending at 10:00 p.m. Also attached is a map showing the location of the proposed party and the signed petition from property owners acknowledging they have been notified of the party. These property owners are indicated by the slant marks on the map. The Police Department and the Streets Division of the Public Services Department have been given information about the party. Public Services Streets Division will provide barricades. OPTIONS: 1. Approve application for the block party. 2. Return to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION: Option No.1 i s DATE BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION CITY OF LINO LAKES The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as a request to hold a block party on the public right -of -way. NAME OF APPLICANT : h (C ‘6, \ k \ ADDRESS ( � � I-c, ( ( ( /V .t__ke S HOME TELEPHONE NO. : &r(- (46 WORK TELEPHONE NO. : - LOCATION OF BLOCK PARTY (Street name & location, intersection to intersection) vio ■ c c PURPOSE OF PARTY : \() o L1 yk a 4h er r J DATE AND HOURS OF PARTY: `I - V t 0 3 _ lo pry (Not to exceed 10:00 P.M.) IT IS HEREBY AGREED: 1 0 The applicants agree to abide by all rules set forth below, together with all ordinances and regulations which may be imposed governing such activities. 1. Petition. All residents living on the street or block in which the activity is planned, must sign on the last page of this application indicating they consent or do not object to the block party. 2. Barricades. Applicants shall be responsible for placement, maintenance and removal of barricades to be provided by the City in proper locations, such barricades to be left by the City on one corner of the block. Barricades shall be placed at either end of the street in which the block party is to take place. PAGE -1- i BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION (Continued) 3. Traffic. The total roadway portion of the right -of -way shall not be blocked; at least a 10 foot aisle shall be kept open at all time to permit passage of vehicles of residents of the block and emergency or other authorized or necessary vehicles to enter or exit. 4. Surface of Street. No materials of any type (such as powder, sawdust, etc.) shall be placed on the public right -of -way which will create a hazard. 5. Supervision. Applicants shall maintain adult supervision at all times during the activity. 6. Clean -up. Applicants shall provide trash receptacles to prevent as much littering as possible. Applicants shall be responsible for the pick -up or disposal of trash and garbage following the event. Such clean -up shall be completed within 24 hours after termination of the activity, but in no event later than midnight the following day of the block party. 7. Speakers. No loud speaker system shall produce sounds audible outside the areas designated for the block party. e i NAME PETITION (Residents Consenting) ADDRESS TELE. NO. . 1 - i - ∎ v t M6, h,00 C r(1) Oct 6 f k 10 uL5v %)iY (',,, 7 7/?X ( )� .G-')-- d 701 V J 1,64' 7r.(/-7)99 ()0) i5-1,,,,00_„.147,-- 7 0 d 7 6e,14;6-tt at-i.& 1Y-6. -7L'773 ' ) A oe t Y1 c jk v cte %'c-?I (t C i (c 1e 7 --ost 2 (r) 701c— ( i+'Qj Cry 7 6 -oo g) 1131 ()ail ha e/f 7W -rq7/717 4 U1 1, ribou ter. 7-s/ K( (J ) Al) Mcf-&_) Name of Organization (If applicable) Checked by: Police Department I CS G. %I 4J - -14 -von- ANTELOPE' ••••4897C•••• -48.7/ - 1 - -88. 7/ - - -8897 - t0 •0 1.1'1 1 1 '-eteo- .• • • • ,// 49.727 •'•3370/ • • - 00- • •-. --88.7/- - --/05.00-- - 83.80-- -6400 -- -..N0°// 'S/ "E -I -Nil --." , . ,ct, <" I C.:,i/ •ci 11-' ,‘„," n; .,,/ 1p (.,:‘ -" ft,, ‘ ;./ „ Jr/ .00,00r,fr 15---84.04-- 77 1g W C A R I B 0 U 326.00 ,1111 t'' CIRCLE ..... jni ' I -tfolfq k4 '1, 4- ael ......z: ll'-',, '1:4 •Je k r nN.1' il / , 1. I-- --I /:.. •.__e :de __,%95: 6 / -- -hz ..... 1 6. . .1.0 .115i ,.. i :4 -''''' I .4. ttk:.' .14 f7cO vs O4'... %••)'•, c•N ..-.. N roo....2 fk, r- Ut P.k,i . 9 .,..---45'.,,It : -, 1 04■,.-t- ?-.' „rh , \; -- . = -.,,"" - ccw \ '.•,,6' I I • t•., :_-_,:„--z-ti.S:-. I /If 0/ .. . ..:___ $ L.,..vs,,s,,-o .- rk- A,s, ,---7/1‘ ---.--- --s8,5: yz__ 30 30 0 30 CZ, 0 941.01 - Sire 84.42-3-J °// :57 "4" /350/ ▪ Oo ..b• 1 ■0 / 3/. k v\t/.• •. C'cI - V ? , • 1 ec•■•,:+37;.,`.._ .,/ - CA .‘,4....;,01 2 ?, 512 /350/ 1 57/ 37 " W 3 70 2 I , ,V%'5/ I G) I to i '.•1 N 0 N - 0 N • OD '40.0 0 ,40.. 1 / 2/ X 1 r.,,:iin N 1 1 /75.0/ tAl tc• . e.0" N `t-t. o : z -•,, N o : m o co o o • ..... • • • 30 30 • • • • 30 111. A/0 '/'.::5-/ "E. (.0 /954/ 0.` cs, •••/‘/. ..."- SECOND •33D.O2 --•••• 706.86' ---"" 30 0 ...I '7 - Z., _415.04_ 7 1 ' ! \i ,,-- N 0 I /15.0/ I 1 ,.. E - / .750/-- 4 . o. o .P1 ••••10 IZ, 1 I 1 /150/ I I Afe'/P.37-s- o CU __ o I 1 1 Nee// "E I i ...... to fl'-• I to 0 N o 0 1 /35.0/ I 1 ,1(4•1P.57"z- to CO 1 1 N0° // '5/"6 1 % ..., 0.1 0. 0. lc . ::','• i c.::.!:::* 1 • I 1.7.5.0) t.N f... (**•.::;.••• /350/ 1 Na°// '57°E I 1 Ato ,',/ '.57 "E , 1 I to ‘,1 o - o 1 /55.0/ - -., -il 0 OJ 1 NO" N's/"E- 1 7.r., I o t.n o 1 1 /150/ Ne°1/'57"E I tt o o I /35.a/ 1 1 Na°1/',57"6- I ?p, 0 U1.- /35.0/ ' ‘,...- g 1 i N40/I '5/"4-- .4 :•••• tip IN tkr. N ht 1 "-■ /35: o / A/40//5/"E 1 to to.c), o -IN o..c„ /350/ I 1 NO'//'.5/"E. to .•••• 1 /_75.6/ I NOW '5P'e I % 04 7 P 1 4/4 07/15/ "E N to .. 03 I Ale 0 " f57 " E ' ,.\, :1 ,••: -z,,N' N (i) 1 ./.75 0/ NO :5*/ ''E 1 ' 1 1 g N) 1. 1 I /356/ I NO Di/ '37"E" I 1 :-A.:.!•.,,•‘-:' 5056'7- • .°•_ i il Ne"//15/'1 4.4 •■•••• L _J -4.350/_a_ - L.S4 °// 15/ " • .. • r• \e:Z --2/5 /9 • -••-- • • 11,155.4 r8' -14.M -18.4. Mt- 80.00 daeo 1_80.15.1_ 1 1 Ito so, I • 1 1 AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Al Rolek DATE: 8/13/01 TOPIC: Continuation of the Public Hearing on Granting a Tax Abatement and Granting a Business Subsidy Vote Required: 3/5 BACKGROUND: A public hearing was opened and continued on July 23 to take public comment on the request for tax abatement from the Marketplace project on 35W /Lake Drive. Discussions with the developer continue and staff recommends this public hearing be continued until August 27. OPTIONS: 1. Continue the public hearing to August 27 2. Close the public hearing RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 STAFF ORIGNINATOR: MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM 4A Dan Tesch, Director of Administration August 13, 2001 TOPIC: Consider budget's for North Metro Telecommunications Commission and North Metro Media Center VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: The city has received the 2002 budgets for the North Metro Telecommunications Commission and North Metro Media Center. The Commission's operating budget for 2002 is proposed at $466,177. This is an increase of $193,698 over the 2001 budget. This increase is due to the costs associated with the formal franchise renewal process. The 2002 Media Center budget is proposed at $647,404. This budget is composed of operating expenditures totaling $497,404 and a capital expenditure of $150,000. In addition to the budget, the Operations Committee has also proposed an increase in the subscriber's monthly PEG (Public, Education and Government Access) fee from $2.30 /month to $2.38 /month. This increase in funding is necessary for the media center to meet marketing, staffing, and equipment goals over the next five years. The Telecommunications Commission is recommending the increase in PEG fees. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the budgets for the Commission, Media Center and raise the PEG fee from $2.30 to $2.38. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. 3. Do not approve budgets. RECOMMENDATIONS: Option No. 1 r e o Tekcommunications Commission`. Media Center July 27, 2001 Mr. Dan Tesch City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes , MN 55014 RE: APPROVAL OF 2002 COMMISSION AND MEDIA CENTER BUDGETS Dear Mr. Tesch: Enclosed, please find for the council's review and approval the 2002 Budgets for both the North Metro Telecommunications Commission ( "Commission ") and the North Metro Media Center ( "Media Center "). I. 2002 COMMISSION BUDGET The Commission's operating budget for 2002 is proposed at $466,177. This is an increase of $193,698 over the 2001 budget. The increase is due to the costs associated with the formal franchise renewal process. Recommendation: That the Member Cities approve the 2002 Commission Budget as recommended by the Telecommunications Commission and the Operations Committee. II. 2002 MEDIA CENTER BUDGET The amended Joint Powers Agreement established an "Operations Committee" which is composed of Member City administrators. Their primary responsibility is to provide input to the operation and budget of the Community Media Center. Enclosed is the 2002 Media Center budget proposed by the Operations Committee and recommended by the North Metro Telecommunications Commission for approval by its Member Cities. 1630 — 101' Avenue Northeast, Blaine, ML11V 55449 -4419 Phone: (612) 780 -8241 Fax: (612) 780 -8242 Blaine • Centerville • Circle Pines • Ham Lake • Lexington • Lino Lakes • Spring Lake Park ESTIMATED REVENUES 2002 Franchise Fee (Payable 3/02) Operating Reserve (Bal. Frwrd. 1/02) ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES 2002 Commission Budget Operating Reserve (Bal. Frwrd 1/01) Franchise Fees Retained by Cities $494,000 $0 $466,177 $0 $27,823 i Heidi Amson (Split w /Media Center) Rose Valez I !cam `.��'" u� t .... "^ •.Yv'�,.. 5¢ _ � a� �' `` � • 12 .�i.m•#:�3�w��., 1.45% of gross wages cn rn co 3 cn 0 L O Ln in Lq 1.5 FT @ $430 /month .43% of gross wages r� �� Ys nx 4 .. Est. 3% Increase over 2001 actual North Metro Telecommunications Bud • e 2001 2000 2002 BUDGET 2nd Qrtr Act. ACTUAL ;y BUDGET 24,793 36,406 o 0 O Cn iL11;it r 71,239 0 T T Y "J M N !h „f., 7,740 3281 18,1381 dy b O ';1');;;,... O O �xk..r t,:.f O O FifriY O r q�5� ..,r... O O (O M �,kl 1 O CO O M .}, :.,,,V :h ;a" O O M 'I O O CO O (O O ti M N t- O (O ' N ,' :-y M N�L^f, E "q! O 4kil O O O O IYt i O "1„. N ,:t M ", .4F.. h tL7 tq ,,C.9 22,863 32,092 1,570 1 ?s:il'∎ .t N T O CO O 2,777 1111 CO T CO (O .`1b °11 (z " d I " CO T T 14,0361 1"r'~ CO 1c, tfti et iiit ., � Wig` Director Meeting Per Diem Executive Director Administrative Assistant Accrued Vacation /Sick/Comp SUB TOTAL: Medicare PERA Health /Dental /Life /ADD /STD /LTD Workers Compensation SUB TOTAL:1 iNSI' -- otrit1 d. mW r : *1,,,,,,,:,,,.r.-6- - ,,2,.�.m,, : tdk: Seef7uS YT �4fi Errors & Ommiss. /Gen. Liability I Property Open Meeting Law Coverage Signature Bond SUB TOTAL:1 The Media Center proposed budget is $647,404. This budget is composed of operating expenditures totaling $497,404 and capital expenditures of $150,000. In addition to the budget, the Operations Committee has also proposed an increase in the subscriber's monthly PEG fee from $2.30 /month to $2.38 /month. The Memorandum of Understanding between the Member Cities and AT &T Broadband allows for an annual cost of living increase in the PEG fee. The eight cent increase represents a 3.4% CPI average. The increased funding is necessary for the Media Center to meet marketing, staffing, and equipment goals over the next five years. The Telecommunications Commission is recommending this increase in the PEG fee. Recommendation: That Member Cities approve the 2002 Media Center budget and increase in the PEG fee to $2.38 /month as presented by the Telecommunications Commission and Operations Committee. The Joint Powers Agreement states, "submitted budgets shall be deemed approved by a Member City unless, prior to October 15 preceding the effective date of the proposed budget, the Member City gives notice in writing to the Commission that it is withdrawing from the Commission." I want to thank the Commission directors, staff, and the Operations Committee for their efforts in preparing these budgets. If you have any questions about either budget please consult with your Commission director or City Administrator. This past year has been busy for the Commission with the ongoing franchise renewal analysis and negotiations. I look forward to working with all parties throughout the remainder of 2001 to continue our franchise renewal efforts and to increase both the quality and quantity of community programming in 2002. Sincerely, "'at.4 Harley Wells Chair, NMTC Enc. cc. NMTC Directors Operations Committee NMTC Member Cities 3% CPI Increase on '01 Actual ko a) E \ 3 § Q. / o U _ iii _- / \ ®.m 7 CO 7 n ƒk = I 0 E. ;CB e § 0 3 Sewer, Water, Gas & Electric Formal renewal costs ons Budge 2002 BUDGET 9,149E 18,850 766 2,000 1,831 3,000 0 0/\ ��,- i k 0 0 0 (0 tr) o R 0 14,645 M 31,4001 � 0 ces. 0 279,0001 0 + � 0 � o 4.4 c) � N. r- K .. � � . � .. . � : W ' q � � }� 142 . ` 0 18,134E 18,850 619 1,250 3,298 3,000 0 0 in m 0) n 2,461 2,400 873 V. 1,000 - m&' 0 , 0 00 — 0 c : 0 0 8,000 L 28,672 38,0001 �ƒ����� ° :�� 0 $ ' , ( (\� ) m }c 47 \d § Et 0 / Postage /Subscriptions Office Supplies /Office Equip. Maint. « § \ q a 7 / / o / o \ k E ca >. § ƒ: m. / Building Utilities SUB TOTAL: Commission Rate Regulation Renewal { Transfer of Ownership SUB TOTAL:1 1 1.,r�;9 Ems %I NOTES t Pr, "x Shared w /Media 50/50 Directors Lobbying Support/Legislative Issues New Line Item Natoa, MACTA, Chambers, Sams IS" ra,r4v Rebuild Server 1 work station New Line Item 2000 2001 2002 ACTUAL BUDGET 2nd Qrtr Act.` BUDGET 3,000 00 O M 00 0 N 000 0 M 00 0 O 00 0 M 1,800 1,500 500. 00 N r �t iil r lr4 25,300 'iY i •, i ``° �t 7 7 .�;':,(f . "s t°C) € ,� 1n O (°d M j,',''''•*';',‘ � O �r , fi u.Yr O 14) M; a �iiS�� I:..Yt t rte_ .ti ,.. >i li +' i N �t`��_it r`� 1 Xi � 4z 4 ��t r Y 7 �,.si•} !,, 0 M M 0 O� 14) 0 0 0 1— O'�, If) O a T 0 �O�, co r O 0 C) O 0 M O 0 t+ O O '�t 0 O N 500 0 N 0 O Co) � O Ch O:. O O M ..— ?7 i w� voa ti 0 N 'xi s ';'.'i41 0 t M 12,247 . #::it CO M 6,016 i4k .. O 133 2,498 1,039 I !'..f.4 iif4 rigi's CO •y� d 4,Xii,•5t4E(�,rs•.,' /E, O o ksit>1440FI 0 1,003 fit i�no S,.` ir••',,, 0 M r Access Equipment Fund Transfer (Audits: Commission Company Revenue Conferences Consultants Education/Train ing /Conferences 1Govemment/Legislative Affairs co E a) C a = Membership Dues IGen /Special Meeting Expenses Personnel Recruitment 1Miscellaneous Admin. Expense SUB TOTAL: -'14j Office Equipment Building Fund Transfer SUB TOTAL: i ,'4� a yf ,e Commission Budget Line Item Supporting Information Personnel • All salaries are based on the pay step system established by the Operations Committee and approved by the Cable Commission. • The Executive Director salary is divided between the two budgets. Benefits • Health benefit reflects an increase from $390 per month to $430 per month per full - time employee. It equals a 10.59% increase, which our coverage currently has undergone. The average benefit amount for our seven cities for 2001 is $420. The $430 I have budgeted reflects an estimated average for our cities in 2002. • Benefits for the Executive Director are divided between the two budgets. Office Expenses • Increased Phone /Internet line item to reflect costs of end user equipment for cable modems and the cost of maintaining a WEB site (Costs split between budgets) Legal Expenses • Anticipation of increased costs due to the formal franchise renewal process. Once we have a new franchise, any funds remaining in this line item could be returned to the cities immediately. Other Administrative Costs • Equipment Fund Transfer $30,000 This line item was first introduced last year. Because of the costs associated with the formal renewal process, the money will not be utilized in 2001 for equipment, but rather to contribute to renewal costs. Even though this money has been budgeted as an equipment grant for 2002, it may also be utilized to fund the formal process. • Consultants This line item may be contributed to the formal franchise renewal process. • Government /Legislative Affairs Next year will, again, be a crucial one for telecommunications legislation. The very existence of PEG and franchise fees depends on a positive outcome. There are going to be high costs associated with obtaining this positive outcome CAPITAL EXPENDITURES • Building Fund Transfer Like the equipment fund line item before it, this money may be used for the formal process if necessary s 1 ESTIMATED REVENUES 2002 PEG Fees ($2.38 /18,000Subs. /Mo.) Operating Reserve (Bal. Frwrd. 1/02) Capital Equip. Fund (Bal. Frwrd. 1/02) Truck Replacement Fund (Bal. Frwrd. 1/02) Building Fund (Bal. Frwrd. 1/02) Other Income Interest Income ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES $514,080 $106,250 $350,235 $0 $90,000 $62,000 $30,000 1:16 Media Center Operating Budget $497,404 Operating Reserve (1/4 of Budget) $124,351 Equipment Purchases $120,000 Truck Replacement Fund $0 Capital Equipment Fund $290,810 Building Fund $120,000 �' i.*'A..vs.dra ".,rrvZd�.k4�`'lw 4�td' w�.siw :',. x 1 n"5.6'.2r. Heidi Arnson Michele Silvester Jim Reynolds TJ Tronson Aric Otzelberger Kenton Kipp Katie Young Joel Knudsen NA ;40'1+5 6.2% of gross wages 1.45% of gross wages 5.555% of gross wages 7.5 FT @ $430 /month .43% of gross wages 2001 2000 ■ , r: 2002 ACTUAL _ BUDGET 2nd Qrtr Act. BUDGET 37,173 1 37,353 37,353 32,550 29,796 28,026 1 28,795 00 00 r 1 270,839 _, N +p) r ,�£k( co 0 3,927 5,820 15,031 10,45711 38,700 • Lt.) to W 25,7281 75,615 I 1. r.... cNi 0 O O O :!II 35,078 72,112 33,341 34,422 M. 27,128 26848 gi 26636 0 25,630 0 231,114 O 010) eIe-- 48,721 Executive Director (1) FT Facility Coordinator (1) FT Mobile Production Coordinator (1) FT Govemment Coordinator (1) FT Technical Coordinator (1) FT Mobile Production Technician (1) FT Program Production Technician (1) FT li Facility Technician (1) FT Production Assistant (1) PT Overtime Pay Accrued Vacation /Sick/Comp SUB TOTAL :I 2�e E. Medicare PERA Health /Dental Workers Compensation SUB TOTAL: 174':i 1 Newsletter mailing, local papers, mag Copier, Postage Meter Rent, Supplies Basic shared, Cell, Internet, WEB Shared w /Commission 50/50 Plow, Grass& Bldg Maint. Sewer, Water, Gas & Electric Yhv', cna wrir MCI. BUDGET r 4,551 4,650 • ` x6 {t 1�1i�e};rznJ.�N 11111 111111 F O • — e ID ''acfxj O O is 4,109 B 4,230 4,551 B. 4,650 gg t ' " . Xa off' ,�,' t f 5 47. ..-ItT7tItt-4 142 3501 20,152 ° 42,760 0 X 14,000 624 2,000 O O ,0;`. COO ;1;I O , ; ! ,, O r µ 27,082 84,810 f '' O t'ax a,: P p 8 iryr r ;y.) — �' O 'e';1, 40,705 42,760 0 14,000 O O •— fd �$1y tsf 'd' t*-- In 2,800 5,000 2,400 6,000 ��'`. ��'�,J.R# 80,4081 y ( `i S� O O c! r— C, 44 z i�k!'irt r"M_ !'• '.. O e— e— CO ■-• CO M M e— Q) CO O) �h 1"-- N • 60,885 r O La a 1 0 IProperty/EDP/Inland Marine Production Van Volunteer Accidental SUB TOTAL: Rent Property Taxes Postage /Subscriptions 1 Office Supplies /Office Equip. Maint. Phone /Intemt Service /Cell Phone Trash/Recycling /JanitoriaI/Water Cooler Building Maintenance Building Utilities 1 SUB TOTAL: Legal Fees SUB TOTAL: lire. tt4i! AWE %I MM 1 . % INN Ads, Posters, Incentive Items, Supplies Shared w /commission 50/50 >, o E a) U vi a) i0) C W vi m (II 0 2 ACM, 1 NAB, 2 -3 MACTA ACM, Sams CIub,Chambers, Arts Monthly Newsletter, 4 page 2 color Employment ads a) z i w T) a) co W ai O) as N as O 2 4 §1801��" ': s U1 Prod. Van & fleet vehicle Prod. Van & fleet vehicle 2000 2001 1111 2002 ACTUAL = BUDGET 2nd Qrtr Act. BUDGET 5,s O O CO a .: "Ytr O 0 00 (y 270n 1,750 0 Lo tC) 0 0 N 0 T 0 (n to 0 N T 0 O d 0 N 9,960 M 30,350 0 to N p ^r, L' Y,.fw } j Y O (f) M I y '"':. F LAVxi i S,Y..3fir O 0 t0 5i• 5`{ 1 �ry �1 -. 'aI .� , 1, '. r1�°ta i F + .v. Vii `I. 47k441`0,644 co fO N O 00 T to 0 T ' :li CO 0) to 421, 0 [t' d' r 0 0 4-1 5 p 4 CO ,M c T M 0 G 0 Nh t„.A0 . r`,d' 1i11 (s r ro`, 0 N CO. 0 O O M 0 in N T 0 0 to L(i 0 0 O N 0 0 co 0 0 Oo N: 0 0 O T 0 0 O r 0 0 N rr *p tt p ?'', O p, T 1 i!`i fr, ii. 9,600 4/7 . 10,600 N., 1r til�`�r�h,l 0f if �„tv/irTlVTt -- jt Fl. ri y1' 1 (L., O) M f.4! O . f,4.7f.Y:k1rt� O 2 0) C'7 {ti� � N C i'.. ''1,•''':', OT (O "4 ���?i N r C) T /. .14. CO) (n -1, LS T 13,792 rF'11, N O : CO � � 4,921 5,7231 OLTIIE1tiAi�i14"[65S Advertising /Marketing Audit/Accounting Mgmt. Awards Ceremony/ Entry Fees Conferences Consultants Membership Dues Publications Personnel Recruitment Tuition and Training Miscellaneous Admin. Expenses SUB TOTAL: tl S4J� poi 3. 10 IMaint/Lic. 1 SUB TOTAL:! , 1 �ngs �e� rya; - 1 6 Includes freelance tech, sending out DV, DVCPro, SVHS, VHS Interns, Bulbs, Camera Batt. Duct tape Rebuild server, 1 -2 work stations P NWk 5 a ! ,Jy F, qx� h tl " „t 2000 2001 w 2002 ACTUAL „a BUDGET 2nd QrtrAct. t =. BUDGET °1 0 Lti -A,1,, } { r t.' 0 O ''.4, 0 O ',' (D e— N 0 O) i.' n'ryf M CO 0 O S O L() ,- 0 O' ON:4 0...,. O in ,e— YS 6,605 M 24,1401 j' a i ?. r4.�P.' 3r 95,000 0 30,000 O ' O 0 25,000 �+, l, 1,407 150,000 :;';'0,4T,1 LO ° O e— O) Cl. N‘— k 0 0 O 0 ;e z O O rr FlaI.is 2,334 M 3,400 0 0) d�.�Y'. 1,4.1 �A CO 0 0 ,OY. 1t r, (D 0 to '' ?:1( 0 O L() . I, yAi 30,000 30,000 O O' 0 �'� T 4r } J(i Sti` 3 cliff �zl Pg', S 1 Y.S.:1; 1 Zfi m„�1:t�r:�FpkTii. 04,il ,fv 1 ;.; ,.d li R O N N. vt a oK1 16,651 a. t1c4,1,1-,. Lll �y �.l {q:pp� r t }17 rI YfR�1 } O O N 0 N E� , f; INNM1014%-- Staff Mileage Video Equipment/Parts /Maint. Video Tape 1Bulbs/Batteries/Other Production Costs Computer Software /Upgrades Music Library SUB TOTAL: � ttl� ZLpy cif'. r A aYY:. �#tti };su.cL.2e "i:.l:.."2.�"�r �t'�4���R°n:&�F�epr�� ��4ae�S."�: Total Capital Expenditures Building Fund (Move, Build, Repair) =7: -1C U Fleet Vehicle SUB TOTAL: a ryr� • 1 ti �r r "c *5� P 'C Equipment Purchase Plan Q N Total Cost I $ 8,000.00 j a 69 1 ER 0 0 0 O O Efi 0 0 0 CO - E9- 0 0 0 0 c Eft 0 O 0 0 Co EA O 0 0 0 to Ea- O 0 0 0 to Eft O 0 0 0 CO Ea O 0 0 0 1.o EA 1$ 1,000.00 1 O ° O O O O di. I.'' t� d f $ 6,000.00 I 0 O O in CO fR $ 8,350.00 $ 6,800.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 2,635.00 tSU: $ 17,460.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 600.00 �[ Quantity x fi e- N C) e- N �' e- e- e- .- N l' jji 1 e- e- e- e- N N •- et , N {{ Estimated Cost For Each - h 0 O O O 0 00 Ea . Eft I Efj $ 1,000.00 0 O O CO Ih e• Eft 0 0 O O C') 'ct 69 $ 300.00 �:' a .: 4 NNId " 0 0 0 O to 4. Eft 0 0 O O LC) N EA $ 1,600.00 0 O 0 O L() , ER 0 O 0 O lf) Eft $ 8,000.00 h 0 O 0 O O CD 69 0 O 0 t[) 00 er E9. 0 O 0 to M 06 69 0 O 0 0 00 CO 69 $ 300.00 0 0 O 0 M V)- $ 2,635.00 I z ` e s P ,.∎ 0 O LO CO M Ni El) EA 0 O O LA I� ft $ 300.00 u�7x �' ; �,,� it s �S ��S , , ' a. z° Recommended New Equipment e. IMac G4 Op. Hardware 22" Monitors Lacie 30 GB Removable HD1 Final Cut Pro Software Additional Software Sony DSR 30 DVcam Record Deck Speakers Canon XL1 DV Camcorder Canon GL1 DV Camcorder 'Canon XL1 3x Wide Angle Lens Audio/Video Mixer 0 F— Non - Linear Editing Software /Hardware fi SVHS Edit/Record Deck SVHS Edit/Play Deck DVCPro Edit/Record Deck ! DVCPro Edit/Play Deck Rack Mount Rack Mount Edit Controller DVCPro Playback Deck Machine Control Cards Rack Mount Equipment Total:[ H Total:I I Equipment Location "Y INew Digital Edit Suite New Digital Edit Suite New Digital Edit Suite 'New Digital Edit Suite New Digital Edit Suite New Digital Edit Suite 'New Digital Edit Suite ah i (Staff /Public Portable Staff /Public Portable Staff /Public Portable Staff /Public Portable Staff /Public Portable astA Staff Edit Suite i 1�p 43, Studio Studio Studio Studio Studio � 1 FJ 7 (.n [Studio p # ;. Master Control Master Control Master Control •�, jr� aha4 i • North Metro Media Center According to the results of our 2000 Viewer Survey, 60% of those questioned were interested in seeing community news programming. We've taken great strides, over the past year and a half, in developing our news program, City Scope. What we hope to do in 2002, is to build on a great beginning. The emphasis will be on the total package. The complete look of the show, the number of assigned production staff, the frequency of production, and promotion of the show will all see change. Specific areas of concentration will include: • An original and identifiable news set ❖ The production -of a new City Scope intro ❖ Incorporate new City Scope logo design ❖ Increased stand -up reporting and event coverage as a result of increased staff ❖ Acquire and utilize non - linear editing software ❖ Produce City Scope on a weekly basis ❖ Expand contact list ❖ Quarterly production of video promos ❖ Distribution of City Scope flyers at van shoots, and other event coverage ❖ Monthly spots /promos in City newsletters, where possible City Scope has emerged as our best opportunity to produce a program that could appeal to every resident of our seven communities. Because the show supplies information that can't be found anywhere else on television it also provides an important community service. It will be an even better show in 2002. SS'; We spent several months in 2001 rewriting our facility usage guidelines. In the process, two major changes were made that had an immediate effect on our users. First, the process for obtaining a weekly playback spot, for series programming, was defined. And second, membership requirements were established. it is this second change that we will be examining closely over the next year. We will be carefully measuring what effect, if any, charging a fee has on class attendance and on programs produced by the general public. Additional plans include a complete updating of user records, the creation of bar -coded photo ID cards for members, the creation of a free introductory class to demonstrate to prospective members the opportunities available through the Media Center, and expanding the equipment capabilities available to members. In summary, 2002 staff goals for the public access department include: • .•. • .•. Creating new forms and updating member files Creating bar -coded photo ID cards Creating a free introductory class for prospective members Expanding equipment format for use by members Writing and conducting an annual membership survey to define future needs and goals Over the last couple of years we have refrained from making any major equipment purchases. Two reasons for this restraint include an attempt to save money for large future purchases and the expectation that we would receive an equipment grant as a part of the franchise renewal process. As the possibility of an equipment grant has become less of a reality, we should begin moving forward with equipment upgrades on our own, albeit, at a more deliberate pace. The 2002 recommended equipment purchases are as follows: • Replace 3/ %" decks in the studio with SVHS and DVCPro decks The two 3/4" tape decks in the studio have become completely unreliable. At this point, throughout the rest of the facility, we are utilizing the SVHS format for the general public and the DVCPro format for staff productions. As both the public and staff currently share the same studio control room, we propose installing both format decks in the studio. This would afford us complete flexibility in moving from any camera, to the studio, to any edit suite. f • Incorporate non - linear editing into the staff edit suite Having non - linear editing capabilities will offer staff a less time consuming and more flexible way to perform the complicated assembly and layered effects that are required for a professional looking news show. This piece of equipment will play a large role in our stated goals of improving the look of City Scope, increasing the frequency of production of the show to once a week, and in the production of quarterly promos. ❖ Build a non - linear digital edit suite for use by both staff and public Each year, the number of programs produced by staff and the public increases. Conversely, the availability of equipment to produce those programs decreases. With this in mind we would like to add a digital edit suite to our current facility. This can actually be done very inexpensively. A Mac G4 computer, Final Cut Pro software, fire - wire, several extemal hard drives, one DV record deck, and a color monitor and speakers is all that is required for a very robust non - linear editing system. It would double the equipment availability staff currently has, and add a more sophisticated, higher quality option for the general public. • Purchase two digital cameras for use by both staff and public With the addition of a DV edit suite, DV acquisition equipment will also need to be purchased. We recommend starting out with two cameras that would be available for use by both staff and the public. • Add digital playback capabilities to master control In order to realize the full benefit of digital acquisition and mastering, we need digital playback capabilities. In order to do this we will have to purchase several DVCPro playback decks for master control. First generation master tapes will have near broadcast quality over the channel. This will go a long way toward improving the total look of the channel. • Purchase or lease a fleet vehicle It has gotten to the point where we could benefit from having a fleet vehicle for use by the production staff. The vehicle would be used to store and transport our scaffolding and would lessen the need for staff to put extra miles and wear - and —tear on their personal vehicles. The vehicle would have our logo and phone number on it, thereby increasing our visibility in the community and giving production staff an added appearance of professionalism. As a part of the formal franchise renewal process, we will have a complete fifteen -year equipment needs assessment performed. Because this more thorough report is on the way, a five -year equipment replacement plan has not been included as a part of this budget. All of the recommended 2002 equipment purchases will be basic components of any fifteen -year needs assessment. t ❖ City Scope Our primary goal in the area of program production will, of course, be the expansion of City Scope to a weekly production schedule. This, in itself, will be quite an undertaking. It will require a very high level of organization, optimum time management, the availability of additional equipment, and the cooperation of the local organizations and agencies we rely on for interviews and information. •2 Chamber Shows In the past, getting businesses and the organizations that serve them involved in local programming wasn't a top priority. That has changed. Recognizing the needs of local businesses has become important to all of us. We are on the verge of cementing a long term, mutually beneficial alliance with three of the chambers of commerce that serve businesses in our seven city area. Through the production of series programs, the taping of chamber events, staff participation in networking opportunities and the promotion of the availability of sponsorship opportunities we plan to become even closer allies of business in 2002. ❖ At least monthly production of Taking Care of Business • Continued production of The Job Show ❖ Tape chamber luncheon speakers ❖ Develop business contacts for City Scope and other shows through networking at chamber events ❖ Develop and promote a sponsorship program available to local businesses • Promos Staff plans to take advantage of channel surfers by playing humorous promos, around programs we produce, just before the hour, quarter -hour, and half -hour, on channel 15. Generally speaking, these are common times for broadcast program changes or commercial breaks. Viewers typically channel surf during commercials. Because channel 15 is so low in the channel line -up, the probability of being passed through during a programming break is very high. We hope to focus surfers' attention, if only briefly, on community programming. s t Staff development will take center stage in 2002. As we have moved forward with the enhancement of the news department in favor of hiring a full time technician, it's important that current employees know as much as possible about video production equipment operation and troubleshooting equipment problems. To this end, educational plans include: d• Continuing Microsoft Engineer certification for Rose ❖ Continuing electronics and video system maintenance training for Jim •3 Desktop publishing, graphics software training for Michele ❖ New equipment usage and troubleshooting for remaining staff We will continue to utilize the services of freelance technicians for all equipment issues we are unable to solve in- house. This is the third year that a goals report has been a part of the annual budgeting process. In examining previous years goals it is heartening to see that the majority of them have been achieved. There are a couple of exceptions. Circumstances affecting staff availability and higher priorities can interfere with the best laid plans. We want to re- examine these exceptions to determine whether the goal remains important to the organization, and if so, how best to meet it. Examples include: ❖ The completion of a full color informational brochure + A more highly developed internship program with area high schools We are currently at the maximum PEG fee allowed by our Memorandum of Understanding. We are, however, allowed to increase that level annually to cover cost of living increases. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average CPI for 2000 was 3.4 %. Increasing the current PEG fee by this amount results in an eight cent increase per subscriber, per month, to $2.38. As you know, upgrading our equipment systems to the digital format, including Master Control, providing staff necessary to reach our stated goals, and maintaining a facility that gives us adequate space and security are expensive to provide. Increasing the PEG fee and continuing to support the Media Center's efforts through grants from franchise fees will make it possible to reach those goals. Staff continues to provide valuable services to the community and the community is beginning to take notice. We receive more and more calls from people who would like us to cover an event, as well as from people who have seen a program they liked and wanted to comment. It is also worth noting, that while there is a trend in Anoka County toward reversing the public's access to production equipment and training, we continue to invest time and money in the purchase of equipment and the development of training programs for the general public. Through staff interaction with schools, organizations and cities our place in the community has become more defined and recognizable. The expectation for the future is that we will become even more important to the communities we serve. With the continued support of the Operations Committee and the Cable Commission, channel 15 can only grow as a source for information and entertainment focused on our seven cities. s it i i Media Center Budget Line Item Supporting Information Personnel • All salaries are based on the pay step system established by the Operations Committee and approved by the Cable Commission. • The Executive Director salary is divided between the two budgets. Benefits • Health benefit reflects an increase from $390 per month to $430 per month per full - time employee. It equals a 10.59% increase, which our coverage currently has undergone. The average benefit amount for our seven cities for 2001 is $420. The $430 I have budgeted reflects an estimated average for our cities in 2002. • Benefits for the Executive Director are divided between the two budgets. Insurance /Bonds • As we are not adding any new insurance coverage, a 3% increase over the 2001 actual was estimated. Office Expenses • Increased Phone /Internet line item to reflect costs of end user equipment for cable modems and the cost of maintaining a WEB site (Costs split between budgets) • The increase in office expenses reflects our increased postage and printing costs, along with higher utility bills. Other Administrative Costs • Advertising /Marketing Ads in School Posters $1200 Flyers in Chamber Newsletters $150 Paper for PR Kits $100 Business Cards $300 Paper for Flyers $200 Posters $1000 Incentive Items $3,200 $6,150 • Awards Ceremony/ Entry Fees Plaques $400 Ceremony Food $1000 Facility Rental $200 Video Award Entry Fee $150 $1750 • Conferences Alliance for Community Media (2 people) $2,500 National Assoc. of Broadcasters ( 1 person) $2,400 Local MACTA conferences (2 -3 people) $600 $5,500 • Consultants We may want to use a consultant for designing a new logo or for other marketing purposes • Memberships The membership line item includes The Alliance for Community Media, three local chambers of commerce, the local arts alliance, and Sam's Club • Publications Monthly newsletter 4 page 2 color glossy paper • Tuition and Training Will cover technical training costs for Jim, along with workshops for other staff Vehicle Expenses • Maint./ Lic. This line item is reduced as we will have a new production truck that will not require as much maintenance as the old. I have included the costs of maintaining a fleet vehicle as well. Production Expenses • Bulbs /Batteries /Other Production Costs Interns $2000 Camera Batteries $1000 Duct tape $490 Studio Bulbs $1000 $4490 • Computer Upgrades Rose will be rebuilding our server and several workstations. 1 1 NORTH METRO FESPH !SE FEE HISTORY I TORY vr, ri rg,{ $ 33,523.291 $ 272,478.00 $ 191,494.61 I $ 52,778.901 O 0 O CI N IA $ 217,404.32 $ 39,955.62 1 0 O t` tD N $ 178,999.42 ke. n tD to M N 0 0 is t- N 95' N tR, $ 121,437.80 $ 36,658.37 $ 195,818.00 a csi in M N to. I$ 8,231.54 r 'a• r I $ 36,805.60 �1 tom. N to N c') 69 $ 174,491.00 $ 176,197.00 PI 'd N 10 0 Is O 0 44 10 CI N- It O M MY J 'y¢ pe fff} A �hF ^rb i $ 2,238.59 I O 0) IA $ 129,658.57 $ 185,751.00 ID T 0) 0 Of r 40 I Increase Over Past Year[ Budget: Back to Cities:1 align \ 0 % \ 00)0) Subscriber Calculaton Based on PEG Fee Paid # Increase Fee Paid/ months /Peg Fee = Paying Subs Total PEG Fee Paid Time Frame co co o = m w co (NI N -L° 10 0 CO m c o m 0 g 7 CO o CO- < w w m ono 0 0 0 @ o m o o o q & # o I & o0 o c CO CO CO 9ED �q ¥ m o o m O- N m N & m # # M a ER A m m m m 2nd Qrtr 2001 1st Qrtr 2001 0 M YEAR SUBSCRIBER GROWTH (Based on ATT Broadband Figures) # OF PAYING & NON - PAYING SUBS. AT YEAR END # SUB. INCREASE OVER PREVIOUS YEAR 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 19,121 18,906 17,970 16,768 15,709 14,968 13,488 11,952 215 936 1,202 1,059 741 1,480 1,536 371 1.1% 5.2% 7.2% 6.7% 5.0% 11.0% 12.9% 3.2% AVERAGE: PAYING SUBS YEAR END '00 943 AVERAGE INCREASE 19,121 6.5% 6.5% EST. PAYING SUBS YEAR END '01 20,363 MEDIA CENTER FINANCES $2.30 + CPI Increase PEG Fee w /500 Annual Subscriber Growth 0 0 • uJ 2 Qto ( 0 00 coX o ° ®o ®j § w. 8\ �� /o0 7 oa\K cc; x \ a ~@ / o kil ; L •00 -00 (\ )6 /o Vi ; crj Is o k®� 7§} \ °ƒ \ )/; 6 N - til \ \ \°( 2\ o \ X CO & * \zt 0 5 {/ \� X LL() A t2k2 2} —ƒ) / §c /§ )§ §2 / ±E /773/2 ESTIMATED EXPENSES § 8 0 /0 0 4 Is CO CS In 0 0 8 CO k 7 k c \ / k ) \ 0 8 m \ # 0 0 8 Equipment Purchases Truck Replacement Fund Capital Equipment Fund Bulding Purchase/Move Prod. Vehicle Purchase \ k ƒ • 0 tD $ / co co oti to w • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 4B Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator August 13, 2001 Adopt Resolution 01 -118 Authorizing Cap on Franchise Fees Collected by Centennial Utilities from Customers Located In Lino Lakes 3/5 Approximately 700 homes and 100 businesses in Lino Lakes receive natural gas service from Centennial Utilities (formerly Circle Pines Utilities). The City of Lino Lakes has a franchise agreement with Centennial Utilities that includes a seven percent franchise fee on sales to these customers. The fee is collected in one year and remitted to the City the following year. The 2001 Lino Lakes budget includes estimated revenue of $42,000 from this franchise. The winter of 2000 -2001 was particularly long and natural gas prices experienced a drastic increase. As a result, the seven percent fee on sales is projected to reach more than $89,000 in 2001. Because this potential windfall for the City is the result of circumstances beyond the control of the customers, the City Council has considered capping the amount of fees collected in 2001 in order to avoid customers being penalized. Resolution 01 -118 authorizes capping the amount of franchise fee collected in 2001 from Centennial Utilities customers located in Lino Lakes to a total of $56,600, which is the same amount collected in 2000 and remitted to the City in 2001. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 01 -118 2. Decline to adopt Resolution 01 -118 3. Return to staff for further review RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt Resolution 01 -118 J:\lsmith\franchis \CAP.doc • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-118 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CAP ON 2001 FRANCHISE FEES COLLECTED BY CENTENNIAL UTILITIES FROM LINO LAKES CUSTOMERS WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has a franchise agreement with Centennial Utilities, and WHEREAS, the franchise agreement includes a seven percent fee charged on natural gas sales to customers located in Lino Lakes, and WHEREAS, during the winter of 2000 -2001 natural gas prices experienced a drastic increase; and WHEREAS, the amount of franchise fee revenue that resulted from the spike in prices was double the anticipated amount; and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes does not want to see residents and businesses penalized by circumstances beyond their control. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes City Council authorizes a cap of $56,600 for franchise fees collected in 2001 from Centennial Utilities customers located in Lino Lakes. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of August 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUESTED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 7A (REVISED) Michael Grochala August 13, 2001 Lino Lakes Market Place FIRST READING: Ordinance 16 -01 Rezoning To PDO Resolution 01 -107: Preliminary Plat/ PDO Development Plan 4/5 Vote on Rezoning Ordinance 3/5 Vote on Preliminary Plat/Development Plan Resolution The applicant, Ryan Companies US, Inc., is requesting a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) District Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan approval and Preliminary Plat • approval. The Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the PDO and Preliminary Plat/Development Plan at its July 11, 2001 meeting with 18 conditions. • Following the Planning & Zoning Board review and in response to previous council action (Resolution No.01 -102), staff participated in discussions with Anoka County and the applicant with regards to the location of the secondary access. These discussions resulted in the modification of the Development Plan, which is now being presented for approval. DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY The applicant is requesting approvals to allow for the development of the property with multiple users that will include an 182,760 SuperTarget retail store and 106,584 square feet Kohl's retail store. In addition, the plan provides for construction of two (2) fast food restaurants, one (1) bank, one (1) Gas Station /Convenience Store, and 30,000 square feet (divided between five buildings) of multi -user retail shop area for a total project gross floor area of 330,844 square feet. Design Guidelines As part of the PDO process, Design Guidelines have been established with the intention of strengthening the architectural relationship between the Marketplace Development and the Village area. The goal of these design guidelines is to promote consistent and compatible design of all buildings within this development while allowing for the - • Marketplace PDO Page 2 1110 franchise retail image for individual tenants and recognition of their national trade dress. These design guidelines are incorporated into the PDO ordinance. Wetland Fill /Mitigation • The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) serves as the Local Government Unit (LGU) under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), which regulates the filling or draining of all non - public waters /wetlands. Three (3) wetlands were delineated on the site of which two would be impacted by the proposed development. The RCWD Board of Managers met on the 25th of July to review the applicant's Fill and Mitigation plan. The board approved action to "Table With Authorization for Administrative Approval" (TWAFAA). City staff has since met with the applicant and the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) to address concerns. The applicant is currently modifying the drainage plans to incorporate comments received at the meeting. Access /Circulation Access to the site is provided from Lake Drive (C.S.A.H. 23) by the easterly extension of Apollo Drive and a secondary access located at the northwest corner of the site. Each access is proposed to be a full movement, signalized intersection. The Apollo Drive access will require the purchase of an approximately 2 -acre parcel adjacent to the development site. Staff is currently working with the property owner to facilitate this transaction. The second access has been identified, by the developer, as integral to the success of the project. Following council action and subsequent meetings with Anoka County and the applicant, the present location of the access was identified. However, to facilitate traffic movements at this location, Anoka County is requiring the reconstruction of Lake Drive to its ultimate design (four lane with right and left turn lanes) between Apollo and 77th Avenue. The design would also include the extension of a center median across the 77th Avenue /Lake Drive intersection, which would limit movements at this location to right -in /right -out. The City's Engineer, TKDA, is currently preparing the feasibility study for the Apollo, Lake Drive, and secondary access improvements. The feasibility study will be presented to the council on August 27th. Approximately 200 feet of the secondary access is being proposed as a public road to allow access to the Schwan's property, located directly to the north. Parking Parking within the development is in conformance with city requirements. However, a proof of parking area, consisting of 36 spaces is depicted on the north side of Kohl's. The intent is to construct this parking area with the future 20,000 square foot Kohl's addition. Given that the proposed Kohl's parking already exceeds the City's parking • requirements and the proof of parking area encroaches into proposed green space area, staff is recommending that the 36 parking spaces be removed. • Marketplace PDO Page 3 Pedestrian Circulation The plans have been revised to incorporate pedestrian linkages between the smaller shops and Target/Kohl's. Concrete pavement treatment, for crosswalks, will be incorporated into the plan. Sidewalk has been extended in the northwest corner of the Target site to link the site with the northern residential area. A bituminous trail will be provided adjacent to Lake Drive in conjunction with future improvements. The developer will be responsible for the cost of the segment adjacent to this property. Lighting Lighting details have been provided. The applicant is working with staff to use a decorative fixture, along main circulation routes, that will be used throughout the Town Center area. Spacing on the decorative lights has been modified to address staff and Planning & Zoning Board comments. All other exterior fixtures are shoebox style with downcast lighting, which is intended to control spillover lighting. Lighting levels meet the ordinance, except along the rear of Kohl's. The ordinance requires 0.4 foot candles at the property line where adjacent to residential uses. This lighting level will need to be reduced. 411 Signage Signage has been addressed in the project narrative and sign submittal for the monument signs. The Sign Ordinance requirements, within the SC, Shopping Center District do not specifically address a development such as this, which is designed as a multiple tenant site, but all of the buildings are detached. The Sign Ordinance speaks to single tenant buildings and multiple tenant buildings. Under the ordinance, each lot or building would be allowed one wall sign and one freestanding or pylon sign. Instead of having multiple freestanding or pylon signs, the applicant is proposing to limit freestanding signs to two adjacent to the freeway; one at Apollo Drive; and four smaller signs between Apollo and the secondary access. The two (2) freeway signs and the Apollo /Lake Drive signs are proposed to be forty (40) feet in height. This is inconsistent with the staff and P& Z Board recommendations to limit sign height along I -35W to thirty feet and the Apollo /Lake Drive sign to twenty (20) feet. Staff is extremely concerned with the aesthetic impact of a forty (40) foot high monument sign at the Apollo /Lake Drive location. Additionally, a fourth single user monument sign has been added along Lake Drive. Staff is recommending that the sign proposed on Outlot D be removed and the Apollo /Lake Drive monument sign be reduced to a maximum height of 20 feet. • • • Marketplace PDO Page 4 Wall signage for Target and Kohl's is proposed as shown on the building elevations and included in the project narrative. These requirements will be incorporated into the PDO Ordinance. Wall Signage for the multi -user retail buildings on Lots 4 through 7 and Outlot E will be as follows: 1. Building fronts shall have a maximum average sign height of 30 inches and a maximum width equal to 80% of the lease width. 2. Building rears shall have a maximum average sign height of 24 inches and a maximum width equal to 60% of the lease width. 3. In no case shall the total sign area exceed 100 square feet for building fronts and 75 square feet for building rears. Wall signage for single tenant buildings on Lots 1 through 3 and Outlot D shall be in conformance with the sign requirements of the SC — Shopping Center District. These provisions are included in the PDO Ordinance. Landscaping /Screening The landscaping plans submitted as part of the Development Plan combine natural and formal planting styles within the parking lot area and the perimeter of the site. The objective of the landscaping plan is to provide visual screening of the parking lot and loading dock areas, as well as providing shade and ornamental elements to the overall site design. The proposed plantings consist largely of plant materials that are unique to Minnesota and native to Lino Lakes. A total of 788 trees are proposed to be planted as part of the site improvements. Modifications requested, concerning screening adjacent to residential uses, have been incorporated into the Landscape Plan. Site Grading /Storm Water Management Site grading will occur to facilitate construction of the building pads, parking lots, depressed islands, water quality treatment ponds, bio - swales and bio- retention basins in the parking lot islands. The use of infiltration methods to minimize storm water run -off has been incorporated throughout the site. Rice Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer are reviewing the plans to insure conformance with City and Watershed District requirements. No site grading activities will commence until the appropriate approvals have been granted. Marketplace PDO Page 5 • Utilities City services are available to the site. Presently, a sanitary sewer main parallels Lake Drive on the east side of the right -of -way. Sewer service is proposed to be extended into the site from an existing manhole approximately 550 feet north of Apollo Drive. Water main will also be extended into the site from Lake Drive. A new 8" diameter water main with fire hydrants will be looped around the proposed buildings and tie back into the City's system on 77th Street. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW The preliminary plat, as submitted, proposes nine Tots and five outlots. Several of the lots do not have frontage on a public road so appropriate easements regarding access, parking and circulation will need to be provided by the applicant. The minimum lot size within the SC Zoning District is 3 acres. Under the PDO, this provision would be waived. All applicable utility and drainage easements are provided on the plat. Right -of -Way for the extension of Apollo Drive is provided on the plat. Outlot C (secondary access road) • will need to be dedicated to the City. Dedication of Right of Access to Anoka County is included along Lots 1 through 3 and Outlot D. Outlot D and Outlot E are intended to be combined with portions of the remnant parcel located immediately to the south of the site as shown on the Development Plan. Development of these parcels is contingent on the developer acquiring title to the remnant parcel and subsequent subdivision and site plan approvals. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the Planned Develop Overlay and the Preliminary Plat/Development Plan, based on the June 29, 2001 plans, with the following conditions. Staff has modified the conditions to reflect the updated development plan and subsequent renumbering of the lots. 1. No formal approval of the application shall be in effect until the EAW process is complete. A Negative Declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Marketplace project was made at the July 23rd, 2001 City Council meeting. 2. No formal approval of the application shall be in effect until Rice Creek • Watershed District has completed their review and issued appropriate permits for the development. • • • Marketplace PDO Page 6 The Rice Creek Board of Managers approved action to "Table With Authorization For Administrative Approval" (TWAFAA). Staff is working with the applicant and Rice Creek to resolve outstanding issues. 3. AD required on and off-site improvements shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and County Engineer, as appropriate. The City Engineer, TKDA, is preparing the feasibility study for all off -site improvements. Off -site improvements are proposed to be constructed as a public improvement project. 4. Landscaping treatments along residentially zoned property shall provide for year round screening. Suitable coniferous plantings and /or fencing shall be applied in these areas to minimize the impact of vehicular lighting from said properties. The Landscaping Plan has been modified to incorporate Black Hills Spruce and Colorado Spruce trees in these areas to provide year round screening. 5. The lighting plan shall be modified to provide decorative lighting at 75 to 100 feet spacing staggered along the primary drive aisles. The lighting plan shall be modified to limit lighting to 0.4 foot candles at the boundary line. The spacing of decorative lighting has been modified. Lighting along the rear of the Kohl's building needs to be adjusted to meet the 0.4 foot candles at the property line. 6. All information /modifications requested by the City Engineer per the July 7, 2001 Engineering Review shall be provided prior to PDO approval. Revised plans have been submitted for review by the city engineer with the information and modifications requested. Approval of plans by the City Engineer is required prior to the commencement of site improvements. 7. Wall signage on the rear of Buildings A, B, C, D and E shall be limited to a low profile identity sign. The sign face shall have a maximum dimension of 2' by 8'. Note: Provisions will be made to accommodate tenants occupying more than one bay of the building. All other buildings shall be subject to the wall signage requirements of the Lino Lakes Sign Ordinance. The wall signage for the rear of buildings depicted has been modified and included in the PDO Ordinance. 8. Freestanding signs shall be limited as follows: r Marketplace PDO Page 7 A. Maximum height of any sign along I -35W shall be no greater than thirty (30) feet. B. One Joint Identification Sign along Lake Drive with a maximum height of 20 feet. C. Three individual user signs in the locations shown with a maximum structure and sign size of 9' wide by 12' high. The applicant is proposing a maximum sign height of 40' for two signs adjacent to I -35W and one sign adjacent to Lake Drive. The individual user signs have been modified to reflect the P& Z recommendation. 9. Refrigeration units on delivery vehicles shall not operate between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Loading and unloading of delivery vehicles shall be limited to the same hours. Requirement is included in the PDO Ordinance. •10. All trash containers shall be fully contained within the building footprints. Trash containers are proposed to be fully contained within building footprints with the exception of Target and Convenience Store. 11. The Convenience Store (Lot 1), Fast Food (Lot 2), Fast Food (Lot 3) Bank (Outlot D), shall require Site Plan Review approval in accordance with Section 2, Subd. 5 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. Requirement is included in the PDO Ordinance. 12. The secondary access and intersection located adjacent to Lots 1, 2, 4, and 5 shall be redesigned to eliminate the proposed offset and angle to improve site circulation and reduce vehicle conflicts and confusion. Development Plan has been modified to eliminate this issue. 13. The Kohl's parking lot shall be modified to minimize access points to the Apollo Drive Extension and to include landscaping islands adjacent to the proposed handicap stalls. Development Plan has been modified. • Marketplace PDO Page 8 • 14. All required plan changes shall be completed prior to the final plan review by the City Council and shall be submitted to the City no later than 4:30 p.m. on Friday, July 27, 2001. • Timeline was extended to Tuesday, July 31, 2001 to accommodate revisions to secondary access. 15. Dedication of access control to Anoka County should be shown on the plat along Lots 1, 2, 3 and Outlot D adjacent to Lake Drive. The opening width for the secondary access will need to be determined by Anoka County. Preliminary Plat has been modified to reflect this. 16. The development agreement shall incorporate a cross access and ingress /egress easement should be provided for the remnant parcel located between Apollo Drive and Outlot D and E. Remnant parcel has been incorporated into Development Plan 17. The sidewalk shall be extended on Lot 7 to the southerly property line. Development Plan has been modified to reflect this. 18. A concrete pavement treatment shall be used for crosswalks on major drive lanes. Development Plan has been modified to reflect this. FINDINGS: PDO REZONING Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the zoning ordinance states that the City shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The 2001 Comprehensive Plan guides the site for Mixed -Use development and recognizes the general commercial nature of the location. The PDO provides the flexibility to insure compatibility with neighboring residential properties through building orientation, architecture, setbacks, buffering, etc., as expressed in the plan. • 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. • • • Marketplace PDO Page 9 The proposed retail, convenience and service uses will be compatible with other similar uses existing in the area and proposed future land uses of surrounding properties as depicted in the 2001 Comprehensive Plan. Development requirements should minimize impacts to neighboring residential properties. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The requirements set forth within the PDO are such that the development will exceed the standards contained within the zoning ordinance. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Trunk sanitary sewer and water main are adjacent to the site and were constructed in anticipation of intense commercial development within this area. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within the capabilities of streets serving the property. Traffic generated by the site will utilize Lake Drive (C.S.A.H. 23). This street is classified as a "A" Minor Arterial and is capable, with the improvements proposed, of supporting the anticipated traffic volumes. Staff recommends finding that the project complies with the above factors. OPTIONS 1. Approve rezoning to PDO based on findings in this report. 2. Approve PDO Development Plan /Preliminary Plat with conditions in the resolution. 3. Deny Applications. 4. Return to staff and continue to next meeting. RECOMMENDATION Options 1 and 2. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. 16 -01. 2. Resolution No. 01 -107. • 16 -01 Council Member • introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 16-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM SC, SHOPPING CENTER TO PDO, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: SECTION I. FINDINGS The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd.1E of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan, as the site is guided for commercial uses. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for commercial uses. Land in the area of the site is already developed with commercial uses or designated for such use. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Utilities are currently available to the site. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property in conjunction with the public improvements proposed. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by rezoning from SC, Shopping Center to PDO, Planned Development Overlay pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: Exhibit A SECTION 2. DISTRICT PROVISIONS • A. Development of the subject property shall be in accordance with the development plans shown on the following exhibits: • • Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Ordinance 16 -01 Page 2 Preliminary Plat prepared by Westwood Development Services dated August 8, 2001. Site Plan prepared by Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., dated Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan prepared by Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., dated Landscaping Plan, prepared by Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., dated B Design Guidelines. Buildings that substantially comply with the following guidelines shall be deemed to meet the architectural intent of Lino Lakes Marketplace PDO. 1. Composition and Massing. Building massing should be used to highlight the location of the building entry. Corners should be accentuated with massing or material accents. Building facades should be composed of three recognizable elements of a base, a middle and a top. Therefore, all single tenant buildings and multiple tenant buildings will be required to use common facade elements such as: Defined base with accent materials Signband field of stucco or similar color material Cornice line of stucco over entry areas. The design will be consistent on all buildings. Cornice line of stucco or field color. This cornice line can be particular to the building. Colonial style gable roof forms and standing seam metal similar to what is shown on the submitted building elevations for Super Target and Buildings A, B, C, D and E should be designed in proportion and scale to the individual building. This form may not be applicable on all building types and retail franchise image. 2. Materials. Common materials used throughout the development will provide visual continuity that will enhance individual buildings as well as reinforce the Town Center District. All buildings will be required to use the following materials or other materials substantially similar in color and texture. Material Manufacturer Brick Field Color Brick Accent CMU Base CMU Accent EIFS Field/Signband EIFS Cornice Beldon Brick Beldon Brick Anchor Block Anchor Block Dryvit Dryvit Color Jewel Blend A 97 -02 Potomac Clear 99 -36 Mojave Saddle Sandlewood Beige Buckskin Finish Velour Texture Dart-Tex Rock Face Burnished Quartzputz Sand Texture • • Ordinance 16 -01 Page 3 Metal Standing Seam PAC Clad Hartford Green N/A Metal Cap Flashing To Match EIFS Cornice Color The franchise retail image of each tenant should be coordinated with these materials wherever possible. 3. Accent Lighting When accent lighting is proposed on the building, it will be required to use the item listed below. Material Wall mounted accent lights Manufacturer Model Color/Finish Phoenix Intrigue Series -Metro TBD 4. Multiple Tenant Buildings: Building A (Outlot E), Building B (Lot 4), Building C (Lot 5), Building D (Lot 6) and Building E (Lot 7) shall be designed in accordance with the following: Exhibit F Multi -tenant Building Elevation, prepared by RSP Architects, Ltd., dated May 9, 2001. 5. Single Tenant Buildings: The Gas /Convenience Store (Lot 1), Fast Food Restaurants (Lots 2 and 3), and Bank (Outlot D) shall be designed in accordance with the following: Single use tenants shall substantially comply with the development standards outlined above while still maintaining their retail dress image. It is strongly encouraged that each building incorporate the gable end roof form and standing seam metal over the entry or on the corners to reflect the vernacular established by other buildings on the site. 5. SuperTarget (Lot 9) shall be designed in accordance with the following: Exhibit G SuperTarget Building Elevation prepared by Target Stores, dated March 27, 2001. 6. Kohl's (Lot 8) shall be designed in accordance with the following: Exhibit H Kohl's Building Elevation prepared by KKE Architects, Inc., dated June 28, 2001. C. Signs Signs on the subject property shall conform to the Planned Development Overlay Site Plan and the requirements setforth herein. 1. Wall Signs. • • • Ordinance 16 -01 Page 4 a. SuperTarget (Lot 9) signs shall conform to the following: All letters and logos will be individual aluminum cans, internally illuminated. Proposed Sign 30" Pharmacy 12' Bullseye 60" TARGET 72" Super 8" underscore 48" Expect More Pay Less 35" Archer Farms 26" Market 24" Tenant sign TBD Specifications Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype green face, trim and return. Prototype green face, trim and return. Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype green face, trim and return. Prototype Red face, trim and return. TBD Location front elevation South (front) West elevation South (front) West elevation West entry on front elevation East entry on front elevation South (front) b. Kohl's (Lot 8) signs shall conform to the following: Proposed Sign 60" Tenant Sign Specifications Individual letters, internally illuminated Location South elev. Between main entries, North elev. NE corner Square feet 56 sf 489 sf 365sf Combined 167 sf 143 sf Combined 100 sf maximum per tenant Square feet 100 sf each c. Multiple Tenant Buildings: Wall signs for Building A (Outlot E), Building B (Lot 4), Building C (Lot 5), Building D (Lot 6) and Building E (Lot 7) shall be in accordance with the following: i. Building fronts shall have a maximum average sign height of 30 inches and a maximum width equal to 80% of the lease width. Capital letters shall not exceed 36 inches. ii. Building rears shall have a maximum average sign height of 24 inches and a maximum width equal to 60% of the lease width. Capital letters shall not exceed 30 inches. Ordinance 16 -01 Page 5 iii. In no case shall the total sign area, per business, exceed 100 square feet for building fronts and 75 square feet for building rears. d. Single Tenant Buildings: Wall Signage for the Gas /Convenience Store (Lot 1), Fast Food Restaurants (Lots 2 and 3), and Bank (Outlot D) shall be designed in accordance with the sign requirements of the SC — Shopping Center District as specified in Ordinance No. 12 -97. 2. Freestanding Signs a. Pylon sign A (Combination Sign) shall be in conformance with the dimensional standards depicted in Exhibit I and be subject to the following sign details Proposed Sign 6' -9 "x 7' -4" Super TARGET and Logo 3' x 6' -9" KOHL'S Specifications White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. Square feet 49.5 sf per side. 20.25 sf each tenant, each side. b. Pylon sign B (Super Target Sign) shall be in conformance with the dimensional standards depicted in Exhibit J and be subject to the following sign details. Proposed Sign 17' -3 "x 14' -0" "Super TARGET and Logo Specifications White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. Square feet 242 sf per side. c. Pylon sign C (Kohl's) shall be in conformance with the dimensional and architectural standards depicted in Exhibit J and subject to the following sign details. Proposed Sign 28' -0" x 6' -0" KOHL'S Specifications White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. Square feet 168 sf per side. d. Monument Signs (Lots 1, 2, and 3) shall be in conformance with the dimensional and architectural standards depicted in Exhibit I and be subject to the following sign details. Proposed Sign 5' -0" x 7' -0" Tenant sign • Specifications White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. Square feet 35 sf per side. Ordinance 16 -01 Page 6 D. Special Provisions 1. Refrigeration units on delivery vehicles shall not operate between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Loading and unloading of delivery vehicles shall be limited to the same hours. 2. Site Plan Review. Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3 and Outlot D shall require Site Plan Review approval in accordance with Section 2, Subd. 5 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. 3. Development of Outlot D and Outlot E as depicted in the Site Plan (Exhibit C) shall be contingent on the developer acquiring title to the adjacent parcel and follow the platting requirements of the Lino Lakes Subdivison Ordinance. Development of said lots as specified herein and in conformance with the Site Plan (Exhibit C) shall not require amendment to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO). 4. Minor variations from the approved plans may be approved by the City's Development Review Committee, under the direction of the Community Development Director. Substantial departures from the approved plans will require an amendment to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO). 5. Unless otherwise specified herein the development shall be subject to the provisions of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable chapters of City Code. SECTION 3. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ordinance 16 -01 Page 7 The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. • • EXHIBIT A PROPERTY description is as follows: Ordinance 16 -01 Page 8 That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and Lot 15, Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, and the Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8; thence Northeasterly along said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 444.0 feet to the point of beginning of this description; thence East and parallel with said South line of Section 8 for 413.00 feet; thence Southwesterly and parallel with said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 209.00 feet; thence East and parallel with said South line of said Section for 812.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the Northwesterly right of way line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 35W; thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly right of way line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 35W to its intersection with the East line of said Section 8; thence North along said East line of Section 8 to the Northeast corner of South Half of Southeast Quarter of said Section 8; thence West along the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter of Section 8 to its intersection with the Easterly right of way line of said Old Minnesota Highway No. 8; thence Southwesterly along said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING 3 PARCELS: EXCEPTION NO. 1 That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and that part of Lot 15 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota described jointly as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8; thence West along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 1172.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing West, along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 208.7 feet; thence South, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 233.00 feet; thence East deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 208.7 feet; thence North, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 233.00 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION NO. 2 That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, distant 1587.48 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence South at right angles, a distance of 201.00 feet; thence West, parallel with the North line of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter and to the Easterly right of way line of Old State Trunk Highway No. 8; thence Northeasterly on said Easterly right of way line to its intersection with the • • Ordinance 16 -01 Page 9 North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence East on said North line to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION NO. 3 That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West (assumed bearing), along the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, a distance of 1380.70 feet, to the actual point of beginning of tract to be described; thence at right angle to the North line, South 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds West, 233.00 feet; thence at a right angle, North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West, 500.57 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 17; thence Northeasterly, along said Easterly line of a curve whose radius is 5641.85 feet, a central angle of 00 degrees 21 minutes 52 seconds, a distance of 35.88 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the South line of the North 201.00 feet of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East, parallel with North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, to a point of intersection, said point of intersection distance 1587.48 feet West of the Northeast corner of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, and 201.00 feet Southerly at a right angle to said North line; thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds East, on said right angle line, 201.00 feet, to the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East, 206.78 feet; to the actual point of beginning. 02000 Westwood Professional Services, Inc 41 6 / /lam' Lin (l /+ • i• 1 .0 r v L `. 179 OUILOT 6d0 LOT4 778 67 OU20_T E 753 8 709 NOTE: SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS FOR EASEMENT DETAIL /-N 7- L.V / I ware WORN 1YC OF PER DOC Ma VICINITY MAP NO SCALE LOT5 148 179 rl/ LOT 6 • 179 LOT 7 779 0 +od- LO718 Y y s 9 8 8 h 7 I E ) n '% L Ado DRIVE 1 li • Lnr l".wi Qc a ""F +a LEGEND ,yW CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE • WETLAND - SIGN - TRAFFIC /OTHER ® MAIL BOX El CABLE TV BOX - GUY WIRE ,O' POWER POLE sO SANITARY MANHOLE O SOIL BORING BITUMINOUS SURFACE A RIGHT OF ACCESS TO ANOKA COUNTY J94 TRH Sae lo I Ct Ca 0-11 11721-°; II `1 I Mart OF WV PER t0 OF MdT OF eAY PER BOOK 27 OF VMS PAM NI 46 � (_'J , 870,4071W LAE a nor 5//2 or NF sel /■ aMCa LOT9 :77TH 4 STREET) o !. 426 / r> caw ,sus a./ IM/1 a sEC a 6 F Srr OUILOT B WE T7. 6.N 1 OU7LOT A 64/ • RS1 p,� N -� 0- so. i OWNER AREA SUMMARY BLOCK 1 LOT 1 - 48441 5.F. - 1.112 AC. • FLARED ENO SECTION LOT 2 = 30,814 SF = 0.707 AC LOT 3 - 30.220 SF. = 0.694 AC • STORM MANHOLE LOT 4 46.787 SF. - 7.074 AC © TELEPHONE BOX LOT 5 ke 28,491 SF. = 0.654 AC. LOT 6 = 26,339 S.F. = 0.605 AC. • HYDRANT LOT 7 - 30,688 S.F. - 0.705 AC -us- CAS LINE LOT 8 = 440.087 5.6. - 10.703 AC 407 9 - 690.408 5.8'. - 15.850 40. -Palms 80978 OVERHEAD OUROT A = 160,351 SF = 3.687 AC. -PUS POWER UNDERGROUND OUROT B = 64,96J S.F. = 7.491 AC. -sot- SANITARY SEWER OUTLOT C - 20,737 SF. - .0476 AC. OUROT 0 = 24.098 5.F. = 0.553 AC. -sTO- STORM SEWER OUROT E - 21.338 S.F. - 0490 AC. -nc- TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ROW 7704 = 63,907 SF. = 1,467 AL. -MAT- WA TERMA /N ROW APOLLO - 21.503 SF. w 0.496 AC -x- FENCE LINE SITE = 1.749.271 S.F. = 40.758 AC CURRENT ZONING Zoning: Shopping Carta O/sfrict Setbacks' Building: Front 50 feet Side 10 feet Rea 30 feet Street 50 feet Parkin g; Side 5 feet Rea 5 feet Street 15 feet GLENN R. & MYRNA L. REHBEIN CLYDE L. & ARLENE M. REHBEIN MICHAEL D. & CHERYL P. WINCE (C /O GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES) 8651 Naples 5t. N.E. Blaine, MN 55449-6724 763- 784 -0657 DEVELOPER RYAN COMPANIES 1.15, INC. 700 International Centre 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 612 -336 -1200 PLANNER - ENGINEER: PARSONS TRANSPORTA PON CROUP, INC. 711 Third Avenue South Suite 350 Minneapolis. MN 55401 612 -J70 -2670 SURVEYOR: WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. 3701 12th Street North Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 320 -253 -9495 ".Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th St. North, Ste. 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Phone: 320- 253 -9495 Fax 320-253-8737 1 IoW, eats ON Ms won w p .& by eons mole my And spa and Or I r • AST Mask Lod Sanyo ode W inn N Or 81re N kea.t aewyeOe 4-0047 SHOW NOW LOT LAYOUT 40747 SHOW NEW LOT LAYOUT WOT u'ro Tr 60141 SHOW NEW LOT LAYOUT a ADD MSSIONT 0887511 74,01 SHOW NEW LOT LAYOUT Crow AP aedet SAC Dnwe SW8 Farad DINO . Wider Prepared for. Ryan Companies US, Inc. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -3387 EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North. Range 22 West. and Lot 15. Auditors Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of Section 8, Township 31 North. Range 22 West. Anoka County, Minnesota, and the Easterly right of way line of Ltd Minnesota Highway No. . thence N 9h y 8 e 0a wlto the Wang said beginning of right esway /ere of of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 444.0 o t lest f0 the point of .' /500 feet; this description; thence et and 95800 with said South Ina /Section 8 for 1 000 /set, thence Southwesterly 209, 0fe and once with said Easterly right of way line I/o o/ 40 Minnesota or 812. No 8 for more a or le .. / thence East and W/ /0. art said South line of said Section for ota feet, a less to /M intersection 5W thence ce the Northwesterly along right Northwesterly way Inc o/ Minnesota Minns Interstate a H tersto No. 35W, Nonce W to its il7/7 along sad 171. 7,lin right f way line / Minnesota North 01 /79. Highway N0/ J7 ec its i8t to theon with the 8,7/ line 1 said if of B; S o the t Q doing said East a tiro / thence 8 to the g Northeast comer of South Hall al Southeast Quarter of said Section 8 / 8 Mince West along the North Ilne oI saw South Half ,d of Southeast Ovorta o/ No 8 8 !o its intersection tin wes with g Easterly right of way way o said Mid Mnnesota way Highwoy . 8o 8; thence Southwesterly along said Eostady right of way line of pd Minnesota Highway No. 8 for the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING J PARCELS EXCEPTION NO. 1 Peat port of the Southeast punter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 6 Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and that part of Lot 15 of Auditors SubdNSion No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota described jointly 0s follows: Commencing at the Northeast coma of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8' !hence West along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast 000,7.,, o distance of 1172.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing West. along the North line of the South Hall of the Southeast Quota, distance of 2087 feet; thence South, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, distance of 23300 feet; thence East ele6Kting to the left 90 degrees, distance of 2087 feet; thence North, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, o distance of 233.00 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION N0. 2 Mat port of the South Hol/ of the Southeast Quarter. of Section 8 Township 31, Range 2Z Anoka County, Minnesota, described 0s follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said South Half of Southeast Ouorta. d/stont 1597.48 feet West of the Northeast toner thereof; thence South at right angles, distance of 207.00 feet thence West. parallel with the North line of said South Half of the Southeast Ouorter and to the Easterly right of way line of Old State Trunk Highway No. 8 thence Northeasterly on said Easterly right of way line to its intersection with the North line of said South Half of Southsost Ouafe6 thence East on sold North line to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION NO. J Mot port of the South HNI of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8. Township J7 Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota &sorrbed as follows: Commencing of the Northeast coma of said South Half of Southeast Ouorte7/ Maroc North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West (assumed bearing), along the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter. a distance of 1]80.70 feet, to the actual point of beginning of tract to be described,; thence at right angle to the North line, South 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds West, 233.00 feet, thence of a right angle, North B9 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West, 500.57 feet, more or 439, to the Easterly line of Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plot Na 17, thence Northeosfer/y, along said Easterly line of o curve whose radius is 5647.85 feet. central angle of 00 degrees 21 minutes 52 seconds, o distance or 35.88 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the South line of the North 207.00 feet of said South Hall of Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East, parallel with North line of said South Half of Southeast Quortm, to a point of intersection said point of ntefsectian d istance 758748 feel West of the Natheost comer of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, and 201.00 feet Southerly at o right angle to said North line; thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds East. on said right angle line, 201.00 feet, to the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter: thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 2J seconds East, 206.78 feet; to the actual point of beginning. RECEIVED AUG 0 8 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES GRAPHIC SCALE o NO .ao ME ( M FEET ) 1 Inch - 100 ft Lino Lakes Town Center Lino Lakes, Minnesota 1-11 -01 Sher 1 OF 2 20005851 58514777.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT • : \6442681inolokes \ DWG \ i // / / / r / / / / / / C / / i i �( TED ' -1 Wit_ _,_ 1 r R0a0', ET yj 1,G . 1/ 9L')LLitc/ PROPO STREET) Ri^041 CA NAY PER PEED Ca- moil- Of NAY PEP 80014 22 CV' G {EDS PAGE 491.- . 27.0• n f l 4220 n I{ 2 (VAC/AL-TED Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 454 -0002 MN. Toll Free 1 -800- 252 -1166 CONCRETE LOADING AREA 84. 0• / 950.0' PROOF OF PAraaNG 77TH , STREET) I { \ �rTARGET 182,760 s.f. KOHL'S 2F -SFR 86,584 SF 320' N 11111111111411* , 1 _ m sr 0.e ais s Tu 0.z e3 ;z•�s�'' r as , 65' 4 i-£EE rrrri �Jr' -.. •• i lssE£MM' . Ei37dc• 90 Asses1, a i??E� rardii*i CrC %C 1 id. £-7•£ .• I ,11141110111.. /: •,0. WOO 117 507. ORNAMENTAL UGHTIA 401109E TAP.) ORATE \ POND 0RAUAOE At\D U1001Y EASEMENT OVER ALL CF CUMIN A d RETAIL C 6,000 S0. FT. / 25.071'' 1AR. 25.0 5 LA8^ • ➢rCoN • /scN "a- RETAIL B 6,000 S0. FT. RETAIL D 6,000 SO. FT. 60.0' RETAIL A 6,000 SO. FT. 60.0' •8• 6130,0' REIN E 6, S0. F 100.0' 90.0' / CIANGUS 9A1F]@FF �TiP.) - CC-40' P1t0N-9pFTA} MI SITE DATA • SUPER TARGET • KOHL'S (W/ PROOF) • REM. A • RETAIL B • RETAIL C • RETAIN. D • PETAL E • ao x • RESTAURANT • COANENIENCE STORE' TOTAL ROADWAY AND 50EWA110 CONSTRUCTION BY CITY OF LINO LAKES BUILDING SOFT. 182.760 106.584 6,000 6,000 6,000 6.000 6.000 4.500 4,500 3.600 330.844 FLOOR AREA. REO'D RE0'0 PROVIDED SO.FT. RATIO SPACES SPACES 164,484 5.0 823 914 95.926 5.0 480 532 5.400 5.0 27 45 5.400 5.0 27 30 5.400 5.0 27 30 5,400 5.0 27 32 5.400 5.0 27 35 4,050 5 0 20 30 3,000 15 45 45 870 See Note 18 18 294,340 1518 1663 t04160•310E WORE R[0.•aa 306 SAWS V.11 444 1A 6.06 )0.h 1. ROORR R6EAVRNR REMIX PAAf0 STNLS (10/1000 .Ca. 15 N4,0.0.e STNNS REC MO END OF CITY PRO.ECT 111E SITE NOTES • ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE • CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING 0101DE5 AND TOPOGRAPH -C FEATURES. SUCH AS EXISTING GUTTER GRADE AT THE PROPOSED 0RTVEWAY5. PRIOR TO 11E START OF SHE WANG. 114E CONTRACTOR SHALL I11M05)811 5 4110101' THE ENGINEER OF MY D45CREPANCES OR VARIATIONS FROM 114E PLANS • HANDICAPPED PIRIONG STALLS WM1 BE PROVIDED AND IDEN001FD PER ADA 0006 AND LOCATED ON SITE AND SIGNAGE PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION. • 11L CURB AND GUTTER TO BE CONCRETE 0612 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWSE • TYPICAL FULL SIZE 90' PARKING STALL IS 9'919' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE • ALL CURB RAW WILL. BE 5.0' UNLESS NOTED OR0RWRE. • CONCRETE APRONS TO BE INSTALLED FOR ALL ACCESS 045)05 ON TO PUBLIC SN¢en PER CRY STANDARDS. • REFER TO LKNIWG PAN FOR F001C NDEE P9941 OUT. • &A1CIN/�G DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE OF BUMMING FACE (LYP.) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • VA REFERS TO VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL WHICH REOURES AN 8' STALL A16) B' LA10040 AREA 05' 00' 30 MIN LEGEND PROPOSED 00. EXISTING ♦ -4•-. ,.1�i •• -� -- 4 -• o- - -- • - RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE PROPERTY UNE CURB UNE CATCH BASIN /STORM SEMER/MANTIME WAITER MAIN MANHOLE /SANITARY SEWER TOPOGRAPHICAL CONTOUR LINE URUTY POLL HYDRANT GATE VALVE / RECEIVED JUL °' 1 2001 CITY JNi-) LAKES NORTH 0 607120 ,60 SCAIE IN FEET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 0 ] N Y 1 4411 � 0 1 0' 1:///777,1Zj I ROC% cortsnicnal UMRIITVG ACCESS TO 77TH STREET (LIGHT VEHICLES ONLY) 7-? aib, •EST) ■ - 410132iiimay 914 —91 • .510Pramw;•-iima.. ' ri"•■--,o° W .,.• 1-7777-01 1/ l; 5'''',14, • Al Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 454-0002 MN. Ton Free 1-800-252-1166 459006 9,0 606 0610 L6 910147 CE WAY PER COW 09 CE 0FED5 "ACE 491, 1!1 Ir.../MMUICAL 1111A in! 77TH 1-- 2 AN4k, Mt\ '!1q 4 0 0 3 8 4- a 0 a o. III lh 9E1E0* 4404 kIti.v4w. 1116.■1111, IngaS. • lit I I I I • • •■•• !g/ 4.54 0.11. re" k NEI Min --SOO ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / CITY PROJECT (EN OTHERS) ...STORM SEWER DATA ■■■■■■ EljD-OF 511:71,ROJE, • REFERENCE SHEET 6/16 FOR CURRENT STORM SEWER DATA nil GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES 5• 354\1 \\P' A LEGEND • CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES. SUCH AS EXISTING GUTTER GRADES AT THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS, PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY DIE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLANS. • CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT -GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS - 454-0002 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION \CONSTRUCTION. • REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. • THE SITE GRADING OPERATIONS. WHEN COMPLETED SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS BEING GRADED TO 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION'. THIS 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION" SHALL BE DETERMINED BY CHECKING SLAB THICKNESS ON DIE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. THE 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION' IN THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY CHECKING THE PAVEMENT SECTION DETA/LS, AND REFERRING TO PAVING PLAN FOR LOCATION AND UNITS OF VARIOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS. • INSTALL SILT SACKS IN ALL CATCH BASINS LOCATED WITHIN DISTURBED AREAS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. • ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURE'S MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL AREAS ALTERED ON THE SRE HAVE BEEN RESTORED. • ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE SURFACED WITH CRUSHED ROCK ACROSS FULL WIDTH FROM ENTRANCE POINT TO 50 FEET INTO CONSTRUCTION ZONE REFER TO DETAIL • CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE-SPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE MINIMUM 4. DEPTH (COMPACTED) TO ALL AREAS DISTURBED, TO BE SODDED CIR SEEDED. • CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTER SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFLECT SUMPED EIEVATIONS. • ALL ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED WITH MECHANICAL • ALL SILT FENCE TO BE ORANGE IN COLOR. • HEAVY DUTY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 OR STEEPER AND NEAR AREAS WHERE MATER/AL IS TO BE STOCK PILED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. \le EXCELSIOR FIBER BLANKET (TYP.) 00. PROPOSED 5XISPj4 0 T.D. o.o RICHT-Cr-WAY UNE PROPERTY UNE CURB UNE CATCH BASH/STOW SERER/MANHOLE MATER HAM MANHOLE/SANITARY ZVER TOPOGRAPHICAL 00910,8 0916 URUTY POLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE 5(0 160480 SLT FENCE HAY BALE 16 RECEIVED JUL 3 1 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS ARSEcogRAPPovi ARROWS ROCK CONSTRUCTION E411RANCE OROP CURS SECTION NORTH sr 50400 04 0101 ° NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION • • 10 a 16 5 (7 ROD) 12805 OF RR:CATION SEE 80113 FOR WW1 9110 /000880 AROUND SIGNS 1 aoRout oF ANNUALS AROUND LAOS CP IrIGITXPI- Ell RI54 T. G., WAY PER DEED OY 14<51 1400 64 14 PER 900K 2/ 08 DEEDS, PACE 491, ■ • \ \ fak Fn Ail - AI __ 4_,,:iiii,i „v.' ..4„..1- .9001,7,44::,-;,-Feir-,irr-7. itirAull,..r.116.0._ 0113.1Yellipi. °Men tir suger. .:11 loviiimitaikftrievl..e. 4crolk... lir ,...- to” Lolf,aolinnarALIEZZIVIZaha fl t41461P6` " 40,404,› 414ta :r1,504, Win a 4 ilk. 13 — • — a Hai reariiihmesel rogo■qmomook 1441 4' 536(59 0 2 10.4 ,e4A00"' MI PLANT SCHEDULE 1 I El ,01/.1Tik, vo EA cs,,e0 • look 6.14' 440010„---- e AIDE ODFIRIDOR LOCATED 5< 8160 OF SEM FOR IMPIIITIANCE OF POND NMI LANDSCAPE NOTES • REFER TO LIMITS OF IRRIGATION FOR SOD AND SEED AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A 51101, DRAWING OF IRRIGATION PLAN TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL • ALL TREES REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CHIPPED AND STOCKPILED ON SITE FOR USE WHERE SPECIFIED. RE3I40NING WOOD CHIPS SHAll BE DISPOSED OF OFF SITE. • ALL DISTURBED LAWN AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS O66ERW1SE NOTED. • ALL INTERIOR PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE PLANTED WITH CITY STANOARD NATT/E WILDGRASS MIXTURE AND COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • REM TO SITE INFILTRATION RAN FOR DEPRESSED ISLAND TREATMENT • ALL EXISTING ASPENS AND COTTONWOODS TO BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. • ALL OVERSTORY AND UNDERSTORY TREES PLANTED IN SOD AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED W/ A 4' OW MULCH CIRCLE TO A DEPTH OF 4' MINIMUM. • ALL SHRUB BEDS TO BE MULCHED AND EDGED WITH POLY EDGER UNLESS LOCATED ADJACENT TO A CURB OR SIDEWALK DECIDIUOUS TREES / SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON NAME/LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS VI.. 5 ALLEGHENY SERVICEBERRY 1.5° 1408 CLUMP FORM AMELANCHIER LAVAS CAL A0 49 • AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE r B&B STRAIGHT LEADER ACER FREEMANN7 X AUTINAN BLAZE CAL. AND FULL CROWN BN 36 FINER BIRCH 10 B&8 CLUMP FORM 801509 8084 HT. CC 26 THORNLESS COCKSPUR FIAT/THORN 1.5" B&B STRAIGHT LEADER CRATAECUS CRUS—GALLI 991R. MEMOS CAL AND FULL CROWN CO 15 COMMON HACKBERRY 2° B&B STRAIGHT LEADER CELTIS CCCIDENTALLIS CAL AND FULL CROWN CR 9 GRAY DOGWOOD (TRE( FORM) 1.5° B&B STRAIGHT LEADER COMM RACEMOSA CAL. AND FULL CROWN CS 69 ISAIIII DOGWOOD 24" POT FULL FORM CORMUS SERICEA Isurn• HT. AND FULL CROWN FP 64 GRE.EN ASH r B&B STRAIGHT LEADER MAXIMUS PENNVEVANICA CAL AND FULL CROWN FP2 17 I/ARSHALCS SEEDLESS ASH r B&B STRAIGHT LEADER FRAXINUS PPINSYLVANW.A 'MARSHAWS SEED ESS' CAL. AND FULL CROWN FN 14 BLACK ASH 2° I3&B STRAIGHT LEADER FRAXINUS 14IG84 CAL AND FULL CROWN GT 67 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST r B&B STRAIGHT LEADER GLEDITSIA IRIACANTHOS 'SKYCOLE' CAL AND FULL CROWN LL 62 TAMARACK 6' 8&B STRAIGHT LEADER <1616 LARICINA HT. AND FULL FORM SP 36 MISS KIM LILAC #5 POT — SYRIICA PARRA MISS KIM DECIDIUOUS TREES / SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON NAME/LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS VI.. 14 NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM 24' POT FULL FORM 14184619198 1(591608 HT. PA 3 MAERICAN PLUM 1.5' B&B STRAIGHT LEADER PRUNUS ANONCANA CAL AND FULL CROWN VT 70 AMERICAN CRANBERRYBUSH IET" POT FULL FORM VIBURORAI I18-081114 HT. QB 29 SWAMP WHITE OAK 2' MB STRAIGHT LEADER QUERCUS BZCOLOR CAL. AND FULL CROWN QP 55 PIN OAK 2° B&B STRAIGHT LEADER OUERCUS PALUSTRIS CAL. AND FULL CROWN MR 47 RED BARRON CRAB 2' 8+8 SINGLE LEADER MAWS 'RED BARRON CAW' CAL, AND FULL FORM TA 11 REDMOND LINDEN 2° B&B STRAIGHT LEADER TWA AMERICANA 'REDMOND' CAL. AND FULL CROWN HA 21 ANNABEL L E HYDRANGEA 24' POT FULL FORM HYDRANGEA AR8ORESCENS 'ANNABELLE' NT. EVERGREEN TREES / SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON NAM8J1T0N NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS PG 32 BLACK HILLS SPR 6' B&B FUL1. FORM PICEA GLAUCA OENSATA FIT. PN 14 AUSTRIAN PINE 6' B&B FULL FORM P114115 NIGRA Kr. PP 37 COLORADO SPRUCE 6' B&B FULL FORM PICEA PUNGENS HT. 195 11 WHITE PINE 6' B&B FULL FORM r P8405 51R081.6 HT JS 301 SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 POT JUNIPERUS CERNENSIS SEA GREEN PGC 18 BLUE SP IRE SPRUCE B+B SINGLE LEADER PICEA GLAUCA 'COERULEK I-fr. AND FULL FORM PR 6 NORWAY COMPACT PINE B&B SINGLE LEADER PINUS RESINOSA 'NORWAY COMPACT HT. AND FULL FORM NMI LEGEND PROPOSED _ — EXISTING RIGHT- Of - WAY UNE PROPERTY UNE CURB UNE iECEIVED JUL 3 1 2001 ITV OF LINO LAKES NORTI1 T. SCUT IN FEET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION me it 0 me cc if DSCAPE PL 2. FRONT ELEVATION- BUILDING A SIDE ELEVATION- BUILDING A 1/5. • r -m' SIGN LY.YJii"iiY4mouW:Yi:Y:Ta M i.RRLJWL Rifi • ■ iAf LL �MYR- -Bur a SIDE ELEVATION- BUILDING A REAR ELEVATION- BUILDING A CYAN: • • 20'_0 " 9' -0" b' -9" Super - TARGET KQHLS 7' -4" 3' -O" One d/f sign One sign located on south side of entry @ Lake Drive & Apollo Crive TARGET FACES Background- white panaflex Copy and colors per tenant specifications and artwork KOHL'S FACES Background- white panaflex Burgundy background with White copy per tenant specifications and artwork Target and Kohl's face internally illuminated with H/O Fluorescent Lighting Aluminum column covers and reveals painted light tan w /suede finish to match building architecture and colors Rock Face block base to match Colors in building architecture Lino Lakes Ietters,Marketplace letters, and accent bar To be 2' deep fabricated aluminum mounted flush to first surface. Lino Lakes letters and accent floodlighted from below. Flood lights by others. Isigimana 1111111 NM MEW RCM lUA WO r t+� L \ 4,j i, { 74,x — y _ ,s R j ELEVATION PYLON SIGN A END VIEW 12' -0 " 9' -0 " 7' -0" Three d/f signs Two signs located on Outlots along Lake Drive and one on outlot along Apollo Drive. TENANT FACES Background- white panaflex Copy and colors per tenant specifications and artwork Signs internally illuminated with H/O Fluorescent Lighting Aluminum column covers and reveals painted light tan w /suede finish to match building architecture and colors Rock Face block bases to match Colors in building architecture OUTLOT TENANT SIGN DESIGN 12• =1I raug � ss+��. °�s gss of WIND PM BM R. # rn11KbPI1RiR.ND s' -0" ELEVATION MONUMENT SIGNS A, B & C Ryan Companies 700 International C'tr. 900 2nd Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 5540 Lino Lakes Minnesota Richard Nattila Richard Nattila 7/11/01 1/8"=1'-0" 18' -0 " 14' -0" ELEVATION PYLON SIGN B END VIEW 32' -7 " 28' -0" I(0 30' -0 " ELEVATION PYLON SIGN C 6-0" 22' -2" END VIEW One d/fi sign each Both signs located on 1 -35 frontage TARGET FACES Background- white panaflex Copy, .and colors per tenant specifications and artwork KOHL'S FACES Background- white panaflex Burgundy background with White copy per tenant specifications and artwork Target and Kohl's face internally illuminated with H/O Fluorescent Lighting Aluminum column covers and reveals painted light tan w /suede finish to match building architecture and colors Rock Face block base to match Colors in building architecture Ryan Companies 700 International C.'tr. 900 2nd Ave, South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Lino Lakes Minnesota Richard Nattila Richard Nattila 7/12/01 1/8"= 1 of 2 • • • EXHIBIT G SUPERTARGET BUILDING ELEVATION TO BE SUBMITTED • • • EXHIBIT H KOHL'S BUILDING ELEVATION TO BE SUBMITTED • • 01 -107 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-107 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LINO LAKES MARKETPLACE WHEREAS, the City has received an application for preliminary plat/preliminary development plan approval for Lino Lakes Marketplace, and WHEREAS, A public hearing was opened before the Planning & Zoning Board for the preliminary plat and rezoning on February 13, 2001 and was closed July 11, 2001, and WHEREAS, Ordinance 16 -01 rezones the subject property to Planned Development Overlay District, and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat and preliminary development plan are in conformance with the requirements of Section 9. Subdivision 3 of the zoning ordinance related to Planned Development Overlay Districts, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the preliminary plat, for Lino Lakes Marketplace prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated 8/8/01, received by the city of Lino Lakes on 8/8/01 and the preliminary development plan, for Lino Lakes Marketplace prepared by Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., dated 7/30/01, and received by the City of Lino Lakes on 7/31/01. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Planned Development Overlay Rezoning (Ordinance 16 -01). 2. The Preliminary Development Plan be revised as follows: a. Eliminate the 36 parking stalls shown as "Proof of Parking" on the north side of the Kohl's (Lot 8) parking lot. b. Include concrete pavement treatment for crosswalks. c. Modify lighting levels along the north side of Lot 8 to meet ordinance requirements of 0.4 foot candles at property line. d. Remove the single user monument sign from Outlot D. 3. Final Plat shall provide language dedicating Outlot C to the City of Lino Lakes. • • • 4. Development of Outlot D and Outlot E as depicted in the Development Plan shall be contingent on the developer acquiring title to the adjacent parcel and subsequent subdivision and site plan approvals. 5. Final grading, drainage and utility plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 6. All required permits shall be obtained by from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to the commencement of site grading activities. 7. Permits from all other county, state, and federal authorities shall be obtained prior to final plat approval. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13`" day of August, 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUESTED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 7B Michael Grochala August 13, 2001 Resolution 01 -111 Licensing Agreement with Anoka County GIS 3/5 Vote Staff is in the process of preparing the Comprehensive Plan for submittal to the Metropolitan Council. As part of this process we have recognized that the parcel base map information, used thoughout the plan, is approximately three years old and does not accurately reflect current development patterns, streets, etc. The Anoka County Department of Geographic Information Services currently maintains a digital parcel base map and an attached property tax database file. Anoka County does provide this information to local units of government, updated quarterly, for a one- time $250.00 setup charge and a $250 annual fee. This is the least expensive, most efficient method of obtaining this type of data. If obtained, this information would be distributed to the City's consultants for use in updating, the Comprehensive Plan maps as well as zoning, park, and utility maps. Additionally, the city will have at is disposal, current property information, updated in January, April, July, and October of each year, for each parcel within the city. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 01 -111. 2. Deny Resolution No. 01 -111. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 01 -111 2. Sample Licensing Agreement • Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA RESOLUTION NO. 01-111 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LICENSING AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA COUNTY GIS FOR USE OF DIGITAL PARCEL BASE MAP DATABASE WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes staff is completing the updated Comprehensive Land Use Plan for submittal to the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, the current information available to update maps in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is approximately three years old; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to include the most recent property parcel data on the maps in the updated Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, the most economical source of up -to -date property parcel information is available to the City of Lino Lakes through a licensing agreement with Anoka County Geographic Information Services. • NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES that: The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute a licensing agreement with Anoka County Geographic Information Services for use of its digital parcel base map datebase. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Lino Lakes this 13th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Accepted by AT &T this day of , 2001: • By: Title Aug -01 -2001 03:31pm From —ANOKA CO SURVEYORS • • ANON DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRA: LICENSE FOR USE OF DIGITAL PARCEL BASE MAP DATABASE +7633235416 T -326 P.001 /005 F -049 Post -it° Fax Note 7671 Dale — /I)/ peges'. J Kite ite 6r4cLa1r From z ly. $L✓e i1 Co.tDopt. Cc. A (( c44 671 Phone 41 Phone 1; 76 3 _30.3_ 3 rl7 3 Fax tt Fax it THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2000, by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as the "Licensor," and hereinafter referred to as the "Licensee." WITNESSETH: DRAFT WHEREAS, the Licensor, through its Department of Geographic Information Services, maintains a digital parcel base map database, which contains an unmerged property tax database file ( "main.dbf') (hereinafter collectively referred to as "DPBMD "), in an electronic format; and WHEREAS, Licensee desires to use the DPBMD for its own internal use; and WHEREAS, Licensor agrees to provide the Licensee with a copy of the DPBMD, with quarterly updates, subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually stipulated and agreed as follows: 1. GRANT OF LICENSE The Licensor hereby grants to Licensee a license to use the DPBMD subject to the terms and conditions contained in this License Agreement. a. At the time of the execution of this License Agreement, Licensee will receive from the Licensor the most current available DPBMD containing information within Licensee's geographic boundaries, in an electronic format designated by the Licensor. During the term of this License Agreement, Licensor shall also provide quarterly updates of the DPBMD to the Licensee in the months of April, July, October, and January. Modifications and representations of this information can be requested, but will be subject to the most current product fee schedule in use by 1 Aug -01 -2001 03:31pm From -ANOKA CO SURVEYORS • • • +fb33Z3b4111 1—d4C r.u1.11 /UU t—u4tl the Licensor. Requests for assistance in downloading, reading, or utilizing this data will also be subject to the most current fee schedule for services rendered. Minor charges may be assessed for any materials used to transfer data. b. Licensee and its employees, consultants, or agents may combine the DPBMD with different data to create new and electronic or hardcopy products for their internal use only. However, Licensee and its employees, consultants, or agents shall not reproduce or duplicate the DPBMD in any form for sale, licensing, or distribution in any manner. Licensee assumes responsibility for securing this information from distribution and is responsible for the actions of its employees, consultants, or agents in the use of this data. 2. FEES For the information to be provided herein, the Licensee shall pay to the Licensor the following (check appropriate box): a. a one -tune $250.00 initial setup charge, which shall be due and payable at the time of the execution of this License Agreement; and b. an annual fee as provided below: ❑ The current annual fee for the DPBMD for a city, with quarterly updates, as established by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners, which as of the date of this License Agreement is $250.00; or ❑ The current annual fee for the DPBMD for a public multi- jurisdictional entity, with quarterly updates, as established by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners, which as of the date of this License Agreement is $500.00. c. The first annual fee shall be due and payable at the time of the execution of this License Agreement. The second and subsequent annual fees shall be due and payable on the anniversary date of the date of the execution of this License Agreement. The Licensor shall annually -2- Aug -01 -2001 03:31pm From -ANOKA CO SURVEYORS +7E33Z35418 T-3Z8 F.UU3 /OU5 F -049 • invoice the Licensee for the annual fee, which shall become due and payable within sixty (60) days of the invoice. • • 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT This License Agreement shall commence upon the execution of this License Agreement and continue until it is terminated as provided below. This License Agreement may be terminated by either party without cause upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. Licensor shall have the right to terminate this License Agreement upon ten (10) days written notice to Licensee upon Licensee's failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this License Agreement. 4. ACCURACY OF INFORMATION/WARRANTY a. The information furnished through and compiled in the DPBMD shall be obtained from Licensor's records and is believed to be reliable. However, the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correctness of the information is not guaranteed by the Licensor. b. The Licensor is furnishing the DPBMD on an "as is" basis without any support whatsoever and without representation or warranty, including, but not in any manner limited to, fitness, merchantability, and completeness of the DPBMD. c. The Licensee agrees that the Licensor shall have no liability, contingent or otherwise, for the accuracy, completeness, or correctness of the data or for any decision made or action taken by the Licensee or anyone using information from the Licensee and acts in reliance upon the data contained in the DPBMD. d. There is no warranty of merchantability, no warranty of fitness for a particular use, and no warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or reliability of the information contained in the DPBMD for any aspect of the Licensor's services provided herein. 5. INDEMNIFICATION The Licensee shall defend, indemnify, and save the Licensor harmless from any liability, claims, damages, judgments, costs (including reasonable attorney fees), demands, or actions - 3 - Aug -D1 -2001 03:31pm From -ANOKA CO SURVEYORS • t(ti��L�541tl I-44d Y.UU4/UUt h—U4b arising, directly or indirectly, related to obtaining, use, and/or possession and utilization of the DPBMD provided herein; and from all loss or liability by reason of failure of the Licensee, in any respect, to perform fully or observe all obligations under this License Agreement. 6. DIGITAL PARCEL BASE MAP DATABASE (DPBMD) The DPBMD is neither a legally recorded map or a survey and is not intended to be used as one. The DPBMD is a compilation of records, information, and data from various city, county, state, and federal offices and other sources and should be used for reference only. No representation is made that the features presented accurately reflect true location. The Licensor or any other entity from whom data was obtained assume no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the Licensor's Geographic Information Systems Office. 7. RESTRICTIVE USE/RETURN OF INFORMATION This License Agreement authorizes the Licensee to use the DPBMD for its internal use only. Any other use shall be considered a material breach of this License Agreement, upon which the Licensor may, in its sole discretion, unilaterally terminate this License Agreement. Upon the Licensor's termination of this License Agreement, the Licensee shall forthwith return the DPBMD and any copies thereof to the Licensor. 8. HARDCOPY REPRESENTATIONS Hardcopy representations or products using this parcel map data must make reference to being based on information provided by the Licensor's Geographic Information Systems Office. 9. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this License Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations or modifications of the provisions of this License Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties herein. 4 Aug- 01-2001 03:32pm From —ANOKA CO SURVEYORS • • +7633235418 7-328 P.005/005 F-049 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this License Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below. COUNTY OF ANOKA By: By: Dan Erhart, Chairman County Board of Commissioners Its: Dated: Dated: ATTEST By: By: John "Jay" McLinden County Administrator Its: Dated: Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: By: Dan Klint Assistant County Attorney Its: Dated: Dated: dk \contract\2000 \dpbmd -2.1a (5/9/00) • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: C. C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 7 C Jeff Smyser August 13, 2001 - Resolution 01 -112, Minor Subdivision - Ordinance 13 -01, Rezoning - Ordinance 12 -01, MUSA Reserve Allocation - Resolution 01 -113, Preliminary Plat West Shadow Ponds ACTION: 3/5 vote on the resolutions, 4/5 vote on the ordinances BACKGROUND This Planning & Zoning Board approved the MUSA allocation, rezoning, and preliminary plat in November 1998. This project has been under consideration by the City Council ever since. There have been numerous discussion at work sessions. There are four actions under consideration now: minor subdivision, rezoning, MUSA allocation, and preliminary plat. This report is based on the submittals consisting of the following: Proposed Lot Splits (survey) Preliminary Plat Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Utility & Tree Protection Plan Wetland Mitigation Plan dated 5/4/00 rec'd by City 6/12/01 dated 4/28/01 rec'd by City 6/12/01 dated 6/1/01 dated 6/1/01 Land use and zoning is listed in the following table: rec'd by City 6/12/01 rec'd by City 6/12/01 1990 Land Use Map Land Use, 2001 Comp. Plan Zoning site Rural Low Density, Sewered Resid. Rural north Single Family Residential Low Density, Sewered Resid. R -1X east Rural Low Density, Unsewered Resid. Rural south Rural Low Density, Unsewered Resid. Rural west Rural Public /Semi Public Rural ANALYSIS Minor Subdivision: Resolution 01 -112 Exhibit D shows the existing lots and ownership. The Junes property currently includes two separate lots under the Junes' ownership. The Rehbein property currently is one lot. The proposed minor subdivision (Exhibit E) will do several things, including: • Split 1.67 acres from the eastern lot owned by the Junes (Parcel C). This leaves 6.18 acres to be retained by the Junes. • Split a total of 0.51 acre from both Junes lots to dedicate as additional right of way for 62nd St. (Parcel D). • Split the Rehbein lot into two lots, a 1.0 acre piece with the house (Parcel G), and an 8.71 piece (Parcel F). • Split 0.3 acre from the Rehbein lot, to dedicate as additional right of way for 62nd St. (Parcel H). Staff is recommending the following actions as well: • Combine Parcels C and F with the existing Carlson property to make one parcel. • Combine the Junes property into one parcel (Parcel B). The result of the minor subdivision will then be three parcels, one each owned by Junes, Rehbein, and Carlson. The minimum lot size under existing zoning is 10 acres. However, the zoning ordinance allows the following: Habitable single family homes constructed prior to July 13, 1992 may reduce their lot size to a minimum of one (1) acre if the balance of the property results in a parcel of ten (10) acres, or is serviced by public sewer, and it can be demonstrated by means satisfactory to the City that the division will not result in ground water, soil or other contamination which may endanger the public health. Section 3 Subd. 3.A.2.b.2) Both the Junes and Rehbein homes meet the date criterion. Both subdivisions meet the minimum one acre requirement for the house lot. The remaining land broken off from the each house lot will be incorporated into the 19 -acre West Shadow Ponds plat. Thus, the minor subdivision is contingent upon the plat because the "balance of the property" must be at least ten acres. The plat is contingent upon the minor subdivision because the additional land is needed for the plat. Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 01 -112 which approves the minor subdivision as submitted, with the condition that Parcels C and F are not buildable lots • and must be incorporated into other land to total ten acres or more. The conditions of • approval are listed in the resolution. • • Preliminary Plat: Resolution 01 -113 The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed this project in November 1998. The number of lots has not changed since then. The basic layout is the same. Some adjustments to easements and the trail location have occurred. Site Data and Density: The site includes 19 acres. The proposed plat would create 22 single family lots. Upland is 11 acres, wetlands cover 8 acres. Gross density would be 1.16 units per acre. Net density (upland only) would be 2.0 units per acre. Lots, Blocks: The R -1X lot size requirements are 90' width, 115' depth, 12,825 sf upland. All 22 lots meet the minimums. The setback from the street is 40', since West Shadow Lake Drive is a minor collector. This project is approximately 1320 feet long from north to south. There is no reason to break up the block into shorter lengths. No roads can enter from the east due to the Colonial Woods development. To the west is parkland and wetland. Natural Features: The tree plan was reviewed in 1998 and approved. It has not changed. A wetland mitigation plan was reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District. It received approval May 23, 2001. Parks and Trails: Park dedication for this project was fulfilled through the dedication of land. This occurred as part of the Miller's South Glen development. Land was dedicated to fulfill the park requirements for that development and for the future West Shadow Ponds. This land is included in Birchwood Acres Park. A trail corridor runs from West Shadow Lake Drive to the park on the new plat. This trail was originally along the north side of Lot 1 Block 1. It was moved between Lots 1 and 2 in response to concerns from residents on Fox Road. The difference between the originally planned trail corridor and the current one is a loss of 0.19 acre. The original land dedication to Birchwood Acres Park included excess land, which compensates for this 0.19 acre. Utilities: Sewer and water service will be extended down West Shadow Lake Drive from the Birchwood Acres 3`d Addn. • • • Transportation, Roads, Access, Circulation: Access to the development will be via West Shadow Lake Drive. The proposal was to extend this road to connect with 62nd St. This issue has been the basis of numerous discussions at City Council work sessions. West Shadow Lake Drive is a minor collector and a state aid road. It was planned and designed to provide a connection between Birch Street and 62nd St., which is also a collector road and a state aid road. However, 62nd St. is not now able to safely accommodate the traffic that would result from making the connection to Birch St. Staff's original recommendation was to complete West Shadow Lake Drive and connect it to 62nd St. Then, state aid funds would have been used to improve 62n1 St. However, those funds have been designated for another project because of the 21/ year delay in approval of West Shadow Ponds. Staff's secondary recommendation is to construct West Shadow Lake Drive with a temporary barrier at the north end of West Shadow Ponds. This would provide access to this project from 62nd St. When funds are available and 62nd St. is improved, the barrier would be removed from West Shadow Lake Drive to provide the connection to the north. This is consistent with the P & Z recommendation. This arrangement will facilitate construction traffic using 62nd St. Any damage to existing roads from construction traffic will be addressed since 62nd St. is to be reconstructed in the future anyway. A trail should be constructed along 62nd St. for pedestrian and bicycle use. The existing pavement is relatively narrow and the trail will provide for safe pedestrian and bicycle out of the paved roadway. This trail should be removed and replaced when 62nd St. is improved. Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 01 -113, approving the preliminary plat, with the conditions listed in the resolution. Rezoning: Ordinance No. 13-01 Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the zoning ordinance states that the City shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors. 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. • • The 2001 comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Sewered Residential. land use. The site is within a Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. The interim reserve MUSA and infill criteria are specifically listed and addressed below. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Land to the north and east of the site is developed with single family homes. To the west, the current park land will remain park. The large lots in the development are compatible with neighboring development and even create a transition between the larger -lot Colonial Woods development and Birchwood Acres. Sixty- second Street delineates a boundary between the site and the unsewered rural property to the south. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The proposal meets the zoning and platting requirements contained in City ordinances. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Utilities extended to the site can accommodate the new lots. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. West. Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd St. are minor collectors, planned to provide neighborhood access to arterial roads. As discussed in this staff report, the plan is to install a temporary barrier on the north end of the project to prevent the connection to the existing West Shadow Lake Drive until 62nd St. is improved. This arrangement will prevent 62nd St. from being overburdened in its existing state. Future improvement will widen the pavement and include a pedestrian/bicycle trail in the right of way. The new extension of West Shadow Lake Drive and the improved 62nd St. will safely accommodate traffic. Staff recommends finding that the project complies with the above factors. MUSA Reserve Allocation: Ordinance No. 12-01 The City's MUSA reserve can be allocated within approved areas at the City's discretion. Currently, the City has 26.6 acres in the reserve. This West Shadow Ponds project would need 11 acres of MUSA reserve. Interim MUSA Reserve Criteria: The City has criteria for the allocation of the MUSA reserve. Application of Interim MUSA Reserve shall be subject to the following: 1. An application for MUSA Reserve shall be considered at time of Preliminary Plat approval and allocated at time of Final Plat following completion of a development agreement and posting of financial guarantees. The request for MUSA is occurring concurrently with preliminary plat application. 2. The property in question shall be zoned R -1 or R -1X or a rezoning application be in process in conjunction with the preliminary plat. The rezoning request is occurring concurrently with the MUSA request. The request is to rezone to R -1X. 3. The property in question must be immediately adjacent to existing MUSA. The property's northern border is immediately adjacent to MUSA. 4. MUSA Reserve shall be allocated to net buildable acres. The net acreage for the nine lots is 11 acres, and that is the MUSA request. 5. Development of the property must be considered a natural utility extension. 6. Development of the property must be considered a natural extension of existing roadways. Utilities exist directly adjacent to the site on the north. Road connections exist on the north and south. The extension of West Shadow Lake Drive is consistent with the City's transportation plan. 7. Development of the property shall not adversely affect the health, welfare, and general safety of the community. 8. Development of the property shall be environmentally compatible with the surrounding area. There is no threat to the community or environment. The wetland plan was approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District and will result in a net gain of wetlands. Drainage easements will cover the large wetlands. 9. Development of the property shall be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Park Plan. The existing City park adjacent to the development was dedicated in part in anticipation of the park dedication requirements of this development. • 10. MUSA Reserve shall be allocated only to properties located within Sewer District 1, 4s, 6 and the Behm's Century Farms Development within Sewer District No.2. The site is entirely within Sewer District 1. 11. Development of the property shall be consistent with the City's comprehensive Sewer and Water Plan. The sewer and water plans accommodate development of this property. 12. The developer shall demonstrate a commitment to the community. The developer has developed other lands in Lino Lakes, including Miller South Glen. 13. The proposed development shall comply with the City's Infill Policy as outlined by Resolution No. 92 -85. See below. 14. Roadways serving the proposed development shall be determined adequate to handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed development or a financial commitment shall be made by the developer to upgrade said roadways. West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd St. are minor collectors, planned to provide neighborhood access to arterial roads. As discussed in this staff report, the plan is to install a temporary barrier on the north end of the project to prevent the connection to the existing West Shadow Lake Drive until 62nd St. is improved. This arrangement will prevent 62nd St. from being overburdened in its existing state. Future improvement will widen the pavement and include a pedestrian/bicycle trail in the right of way. The new extension of West Shadow Lake Drive and the improved 62nd St. will safely accommodate traffic. Infill Policy: The City adopted Resolution 92 -85, a policy for the location of new development, also referred to as the "infill policy ". This policy includes criteria to be considered, which are listed below: • All new developments must be located within the MUSA as established by the Comprehensive Plan. Allocation of MUSA acres from the MUSA reserve will fulfill this requirement. • All new developments must be analyzed for impact on utility and street system costs. • New development shall only be allowed if: a) The cost of utility and street extensions can be covered by immediate assessment, and • • • b) The cost of operation and maintenance of the system will not exceed the normal costs, and c) An upfront payment or series of payments by the developer would offset any additional costs. As noted above, West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd St. are planned as collector roadways and state aid roads. When improved as planned, these roads will safely accommodate the traffic. Payments to support utility service to these lots will be addressed as with any development. Staff recommends finding that the project meets these Interim MUSA Reserve and Infill Policy criteria. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed the project and made recommendations on September 23, 1998. Those recommendations (see attached memo) can be summarized as: 1. Site planning should consider infiltration design, soil mixing practices, and native wetland vegetation. 2. Consider deed restrictions for wetland buffer areas. 3. Consider requiring individual builders to follow soil mixing practices in yards. 4. Consider a new ordinance requiring standards for soil preparation. 5. The grading plan should include a tree preservation plan. Much of the site will be wetlands which will be covered by typical drainage easements. The tree plan has been reviewed and approved by the Environmental Specialist. The City has no soil mixing policies. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD ACTION The P & Z approved the rezoning, MUSA allocation, and preliminary plat on November 12, 1998. The P & Z included conditions attached to the approval of the preliminary plat, including: 1. The preliminary utility plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the capabilities of 62nd St. and whether the funding and resources available is sufficient to support upgrade of 62nd St. 3. The grading plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The plan may be subject to modification to provide for the maximum number of trees to be preserved. • • • 4. The applicant provide a vegetation plan and landscape plan illustrating the trees to be removed and the trees to be preserved. 5. The applicant provide additional vegetation along the trail right of way to buffer the recreational and residential uses. 6. The Planning & Zoning Board strongly recommends the upgrading or reconstruction of 62nd St. occurs as soon as possible. Until reconstruction is completed, West Shadow Lake Road will be blocked at the north end of the development. The City Engineer has reviewed plans and will review final plans. The attached memo from the Environmental Specialist indicates that he reviewed the tree plan. The revised plat moves locates the trail internally so it will not affect existing neighbors. The above discussion addresses the improvement of 62nd St. The revision of the plat and the conditions of approval in Resolution 01 -113 address the issues recommended by the P & Z in 1998. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 01 -112, approving the minor subdivision. 2. Approve Ordinance 13 -01, approving the rezoning from Rural to R -1X. 3. Approve Ordinance 12 -01, approving the allocation of 11 acres of MUSA reserve. 4. Approve Resolution 01 -113, approving the preliminary plat for West Shadow Ponds. 5. Deny the applications. 6. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Options 1, 2, 3, 4 • Memo Environmental To: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: June 22, 2001 Re: Tree Preservation Plans/West Shadow Ponds The tree plan developed by Rick Carlson 3 years ago has not changed. I re- visited the plan with Ted Matke and nothing has changed. The plan was previously • approved. • Memorandum To: Brian Wessel CC: Mary Kay Wyland Ted Mattkee From: Marty Asleson Date: 09/24/98 Re: West Shadowlake Drive Extension/Rick Carlson Proposal The West Shadowlake Drive extension proposal by Rick Carlson was presented to the Environmental Board on Wednesday the 23 of September. The Environmental Board made the following recommendations concerning this proposed development: 1. That water - infiltration consideration be given to site planning. Consideration be given to reduced or no slope in the boulevard areas of the street sections. Consideration be given to implementation soil mixing in landscape practices and that specific guidelines be given to the developer on the nature of this mixing. Recommendation was made to use native plants approved by the city in re- establishment of wetland and buffer areas. 2. That the developer would consider deed restrictions in his lot sales for wetland buffer -areas subject to Rice Creek Watershed approval. That the developer give consideration to imposing deed restrictions in 10 foot buffer areas around all wetlands. That developer give consideration to sharing these deed restrictions with the city. 3. That the developer give consideration to requiring individual lot builders to follow soil mixing practices in landscape of yards. 4. The city consider passing an ordinance requiring new standards for soil preparation in development projects. 5. That the developer prepare a tree preservation plan at the time the grade plan is submitted, to protect the oaks woodlands on the west side of the development. 1 - 7/ it x ed �O1 LAKE �o19/04,411044 an NA. U`11 \L. 1NTY PARK RESHIANAtJ LAKE RESHANAU e-x ,vaf r /� SHORES: frf/i-rj /114,41 De um A z, o 1311 112 ra nri "T Pi H ��1 dceb Orifevaiiimmergastratit TMO IIMMUMEMIN dattelattO 10 NO 10'; • END T1 Low Density, Unsewered Residential ri Low Density, Sewered Residential o.7 _ — t 1 136 1 N89 °28•E a g RIVED N 69 ?28 W m 01 (39)p 60 a iP Q m 6' 4386 120 N69 °28'W0 (36) va R *60 Oda 2 ►65.64 p 0 d a b l o $w ro� /(37) „, :3.46 191.66 N s3* Po �y9) (&61 1!•49., 40 9.5'4" /9.70 4,70 t6.f '- ROA e d 10 r• 128.08 0 N N78_46_38µ, 236.18 (17) 6 1.0.31 33.0 a sq. N 86- 46 -23E IB 227.63 NNA EMLY OF 14%41/41 (1) ARNOLD E.B KATHLEEN REHBEIN ;(E1/4 OF SW I/4 OF NEI /4) 2 Fp N6.• 6s00. •11 (15) 4 0 V (13) 2 150 CENTER 1 LL 1 lne North Line 0 8 6 5 >c/r1/6/ T 6 4 - -PARK 2—_; 1 i a C r o� - -- i �- Alatt id 1 17f d �o�' 1 7 i a ;ye, Sr),�i 5 eye, `, �P BLOC 11 Fox Road Fox road 4 LOCK 5 3 2 i ! 5 lof the Southwest 1/4 a iBLOCK 4 4 II 3 2 1 I the Northgast 1/4 of iectlon 32 4 S$9'59'57 "E 329.\_ 1 I 7 5 I I P \ � V I W o I off+ i6 J 9'58125 "E 559.90 7 5 329.62 0 z Parcel C 1.67 Acres �4I Parcel F 8.71 Acres w8a78'25' 230.38 2 1JI89'58.25 "W 560.76 Thb South Line of the Southwest 1/4 0 ortheost 1/4 of Section 32 -err ee N89'58'25 "W f the N 4' Aheve Mph water 6 2n 330.38 — I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. and that 1 am o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Taws of the State of Minnesota. *') ✓ rJ . �"i:•� Tedd W. Mattke, RLS Date: SAX :. Minn. Reg. No. 15612 1 _ 1 6 Zoned R -11( 4"" r � SLOCK 8 7 4 PARK T2 T .1 Fox Road 5 • (Jc\ 2 5 JP` BLOCk4 3 p L 0 r. 5 S 897 - tE 888.5 5 3 •2 138 awe.• 4 3 Zoned R-1) Fox Road Met 4 BLO S 7 /4-e/A;fifiecg../ 1 *? Zoned R —;1X 1 1 1 ml I 30,365 SFI 6 Zoned; -- J ned Rural tj r 230.36 N 89'58'25" W \ 891.14 L 4' Above high watts fit South Line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 32 Zoned Rural v 5 OLome. tr, 2 len eV* Zone¢' Flt 2 Lnd R;,cd I_J 62rd Str� I hereby certify thot this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly' Registered Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. am. Tedd W. Mottke, RLS. Date Sr /1P /ef Minn. Reg. No. 15612 N0. DATE • 01 -112 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-112 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY IN THE SW 1/ OF THE NE 1/ OF SECTION 32 WHEREAS, the City has received and application for the minor subdivision of property, and WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations provide for and establish requirements for minor subdivisions, and WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision meets those requirements, provided the conditions of approval listed below are fulfilled, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Lino Lakes City Council approves the proposed minor subdivisions as described by the attached document entitled "Proposed Lot Splits" by Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc., date 5/4/00 and received by the City June 12, 2001. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval apply: 1. Parcels C and F are not buildable lots. Parcels C and F shall be either attached to the adjacent Carlson property to total ten acres or more or incorporated into a plat that includes ten acres or more. This Resolution 01 -112 shall not be certified by the City until the preliminary plat is approved. 2. The Junes property shall be combined into one tax parcel. 3. Parcels D and H shall be dedicated to the City of Lino Lakes for road right of way when the plat referred to in condition number one is recorded. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 AI 1EST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • 13 -01 Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 13-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R RURAL TO R -1X SINGLE FAMILY EXECUTIVE The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed rezoning action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the 2001 City Comprehensive Plan, which guides the site for low density sewered residential uses in a Stage 1 growth area. 2. The proposed use will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for low density sewered residential uses. Land north and east of the site is already developed with single family homes. Parkland to the west will remain. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The accompanying plat proposal meets the zoning and platting requirements contained in City ordinances. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with the extension of existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property, and planned road improvements will allow for the implementation of the City's transportation plan in the area. Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on January 10, 2001. • Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by rezoning from R, Rural, to R -1X, Single Family Executive, the following described real estate: (see attached) Section 4. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. • 12 -01 • Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 12-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY ALLOCATING 11 ACRES OF MUSA RESERVE TO THE WEST SHADOW PONDS DEVELOPMENT The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does hereby ordain: Section 1. The City Council finds that the proposed project meets the City's Interim MUSA Reserve Criteria as follows: 1. The request for MUSA is occurring concurrently with preliminary plat application. 2. The rezoning request is occurring concurrently with the MUSA request. 3. MUSA is adjacent to the north border of the site. • 4. The net acreage for the project is 11 acres, and that is the MUSA request. 5. Utilities exist directly adjacent to the site. 6. West Shadow Lake Drive is planned as a minor collector road. The extension of West Shadow Lake Drive through the site is consistent with the City's transportation plan. 7. The City has reviewed the proposal and determined it will not adversely affect the community health, welfare, or general safety. 8. The City has reviewed the proposal and determined that impacts to the environment are mitigated by the wetland plan approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Large wetland areas will be retained, and new replacement wetlands will be created for a net increase in wetlands. 9. The existing City park adjacent to the development was dedicated in part in anticipation of the park dedication requirements of this development. The park location is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Park Plan. 10. The site is within Sewer District No.1 which is consistent with the MUSA reserve agreement with the Metropolitan Council. • 4 11. Utilities exist directly adjacent to the site and extension to this site is consistent with the City's sewer and water plan. 12. The developer has demonstrated a significant commitment to the community by way of previous development projects. 13. The proposed development complies with the City's Infill Policy outlined by Resolution No. 92 -85, because: allocation of MUSA reserve will put the site within the MUSA; the development of the site has been analyzed for impacts on utility and street system costs; the analysis determined that costs will be covered, that operation and maintenance will not exceed normal costs, and there will be no additional costs. 14. When improved according to the recommended plans, West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd St. will be adequate to handle traffic. Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on November 12, 1998. Section 3. Since the findings support the proposal, 11 acres of interim MUSA reserve shall be allocated to the area included in the West Shadow Ponds development. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. 4 • 01 -113 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-113 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WEST SHADOW PONDS WHEREAS, the City has received an application for preliminary plat approval for West Shadow Ponds, and WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on November 12, 1998, and WHEREAS, Resolution 01 -112 approves a minor subdivision of land that provides land to be incorporated into the plat, and WHEREAS, Ordinance 13 -01 rezones the subject property to R -1X Single Family Executive, and WHEREAS, Ordinance 12 -01 allocates 11 acres of MUSA reserve to the proposed plat, and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the preliminary plat for West Shadow Ponds as depicted by the preliminary plat by Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc., dated 4/28/01 and received by the City of Lino Lakes June 12, 2001. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Additional land shall be dedicated to the City of Lino Lakes for road right of way to provide for 40 feet from the centerline. This shall include Parcels D and H from the minor subdivision approved in Resolution 01 -112. 2. West Shadow Lake Drive shall be constructed with a temporary barrier at the north end of the West Shadow Ponds plat. This barrier should be removed when 62nd St. is improved to meet City collector road design standards. • • 3. Final grading, drainage, and utility plans shall be reviewed by the City Engineer. 4. Required permits must be obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District. 5. Ordinances 12 -01 and 13 -01 must be in effect before the final plat can be recorded. 6. Parcels C and F from the minor subdivision approved by Resolution 01 -112 shall be incorporated into the West Shadow Ponds plat. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • • • AGENDA ITEM 7D STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 13, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -114, Order Preparation of Expanded Feasibility Report for the Lino Lakes Marketplace Improvements. VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: The City received a petition from Ryan Companies US, also signed by Glenn Rehbein, requesting public improvements to serve the proposed Lino Lakes Marketplace site. The petition requested the following improvements: 1. Traffic signal at Lake Drive /Apollo Drive. 2. Construction of roadway, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water from the Lake Drive /Apollo Drive intersection to 745 feet east. In response to this petition, the report was ordered at the May 14, 2001 City Council meeting. Since that time, the Lino Lakes Marketplace site plan has changed and the City and developer have received additional information from Anoka County regarding site access issues. Specifically, the County has indicated they would issue a permit for a proposed second access to Lake Drive at the extreme northwest corner of the Marketplace site if certain improvements are made to Lake Drive. These improvements would include a traffic signal at the second access; turn lanes; bypass lanes; roadway widening; and median construction. These improvements are significantly beyond the scope of the original City Council action on the report so additional action regarding the Feasibility Report is requested. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -114, Order Preparation of an expanded Feasibility Report for the Lino Lakes Marketplace Improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 01 -114 be adopted. • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -114 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF AN EXPANDED FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE LINO LAKES MARKETPLACE IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, in response to a petition from property owners located on the east side of Lake Drive, south of 77t1' Street and north of Apollo Drive extended, in an area proposed to be platted as the Lino Lakes Marketplace, it is proposed to improve this area generally located in the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8 by constructing utility and street improvements, and WHEREAS, notwithstanding claims regarding assessable costs made in the petition letter of May 8, 2001, the City will determine the benefiting properties and the assessable costs, and WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, since the original City Council action ordering a report on May 14, 2001, the scope of the proposed improvements has increased, and WHEREAS, the proposed additional improvements include reconstruction of Lake Drive from south of Apollo Drive to north of 77th Street including storm sewer, an additional signal, road widening, turn lanes, bypass lanes, and medians, and WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the expanded improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the proposed expanded improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvements are feasible and as to whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 13, 2001. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 7E STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer • COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 13, 2001 TOPIC: Twilight Acres Sanitary Sewer Extension • Resolution No. 01 -115, Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications ii. Resolution No. 01 -116, Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: This project involves the installation of sanitary sewer in the boulevard areas of Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions. It is a scaled back version of an earlier project, originally initiated by the residents via petition in 1999. A public hearing to discuss the project was held on May 14, 2001. Per the City Charter, 60 days must elapse between the hearing and any further action on the project. This requirement has now been met. Since the hearing, no petitions have been received related to this project. On July 25, 2001, another Resident Poll was sent to the 32 residents. A copy of the letter is attached. To the question "If the City of Lino Lakes proceeds with construction of sanitary sewer, should the project be limited to the Twilight Acres 1st Addition" we received 21 responses. The responses are summarized as follows: 11 No 6 Yes 4 Other /conditional responses 21 The poll results show there is no consensus on the specific question posed. However, as there has been no petition received in opposition to the project as proposed, we recommend the City proceed with obtaining bids for the work. More detailed assessment and schedule information can be presented after bids have been received. Assuming the plans and specifications are ordered and approved on August 13, 2001, and bids are authorized, the bids would be received by the City Council on September 10, 2001. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -115, Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Twilight Acres Sanitary Sewer Extension project. • 3. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -116 Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids for the Twilight Acres Sanitary Sewer Extension project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 then Option No. 3 • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -115 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - TWILIGHT ACRES SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 26th of March, 2001, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvements for Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Additions by constructing sanitary sewer, and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the May 14, 2001, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer, John Powell, is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 13, 2001. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • • Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -116 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS — TWILIGHT ACRES SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the Twilight Acres 1st and 2nd Addition Sanitary Sewer extension project, and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for ten days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk until 10:00 a.m. on Friday, September 7, 2001, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, September 10, 2001, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 13, 2001. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • July 25, 2001 To: Twilight Acres lst and 2nd Addition Area Residents Re: Project Update and Resident Poll Dear Resident: On May 14, 2001, the City Council held a public hearing for the above referenced project. At the meeting a revised feasibility report was presented. The revised report detailed the construction of sanitary sewer only. The sanitary sewer would be constructed in the boulevards to minimize street removal and replacement. By constructing the sanitary sewer in the boulevards it will not have the necessary depth to provide a gravity connection to the existing homes. The existing homes will need a grinder pump to facilitate their sanitary flow into the new sewer main. At the public hearing an alternative was also presented that involved removing the portion of the project within the Twilight Acres 2nd Addition. This may allow the City to apply the Community Development Block Grant it received to 25 lots, rather than 32 lots. This could reduce the average assessment in the Twilight Acres 1st Addition from $5,900 to $3,500. At the time of the public hearing it was not known if Anoka County would allow the City to reduce the project area and keep the entire grant. Since the public hearing it has been determined that the reduced project area would still meet the federal requirements for the grant. However, the County Board would review the revised project and may decide to alter the amount of the grant. The City Council has directed City staff to send out a survey to poll the affected property owners regarding the project proceeding. Please complete the attached poll form and return it to the City at your earliest convenience. We would appreciate receiving your response no later than Friday, August 3, 2001. If you have any questions before the meeting, please call me at 651- 982 -2430. Sincerely, John M. Powell, P.E. • City Engineer • • • Name: CITY OF LINO LAKES TWILIGHT ACRES 1sT AND 2ND ADDITION PROJECT RESIDENT POLL Street Address: Question: If the City of Lino Lakes proceeds with construction of sanitary sewer, should the project be limited to the Twilight Acres 1st Addition? Comments: No Yes When complete, please return to the City in the enclosed envelope. Thank you for your response. AGENDA ITEM 7F • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer • • COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 13, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -117, Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract, 2001 Sealcoat Program VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on July 24, 2001. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid Pearson Bros., Inc $ 97,559.00 Allied Blacktop Co. $ 98,813.00 Astech Corp. $ 118,025.50 Engineer's Estimate $ 87,425.00 The low bid is approximately 11% above the Engineer's Estimate for this project. Per the attached recommendation, the additional cost is due to a significant increase in the cost of aggregate. Roadways in the project include both new streets that were paved about 2 or 3 years ago, and other City streets on a 5 to 7 year cycle. Based on the unit prices of the low bidder, the funding allocation is as follows: Funding Source Amount Sealcoat and Wearing Course Fund (newer streets) $ 38,043.75 Street Department- Contracted Services (5 -7 year cycle) $ 59,515.25 Total $ 97,559.00 The completion date for placement of asphalt and rock chips is August 31, 2001; the completion date for sweepings is September 29, 2001 OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 01 -117, receive bids and award a construction contract to Pearson Bros., Inc. for the 2001 Sealcoat Program. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 01 -117. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 01 -117. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -117 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — 2001 SEALCOAT PROGRAM. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the 2001 Sealcoat Program, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Amount of Bid Pearson Bros., Inc $ 97,559.00 Allied Blacktop Co. $ 98,813.00 Astech Corp. $ 118,025.50 Engineer's Estimate $ 87,425.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Pearson Bros., Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Pearson Bros., Inc., in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the 2001 Sealcoat Program according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 13, 2001. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • KDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS August 6, 2001 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Re: 2001 Sealcoating City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA Commission No. 12357 -01 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE: 651/292-4400 FAX: 651/292-0083 Bids for the above referenced project were received on July 24, 2001. The low bidder was Pearson Bros. at $97,559.00. The engineer's estimate for the project was $87,425.00. The difference in the engineer's estimate and the low bid can be attributed to a significant increase in the unit price for trap rock. The price of trap rock has increased over twenty percent from last year. Pearson Bros. performed the sealcoating project last year for the City. They completed the project on time and under budget. I recommend that the contract for the 2001 Sealcoating project be awarded to Pearson Bros. If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to give me a. call. Sincerely, Jason C. Wedel, P.E. cc: John Powell, City Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES DATE : June 25, 2001 TIME STARTED : 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED : 10:40 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson MEMBERS ABSENT : None Staff members present: City Administrator, Linda Waite Smith; City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; City Engineer, John Powell; City Planner, Jeff Smyser; Public Services Director, Rick DeGardner; Economic Development Director, Brian Wessel (part); Economic Development Assistant, Mary Alice Divine (part); Environmental Specialist, Marty Asleson (part); and Community Development Director, Mike Grochala SETTING THE AGENDA Mayor Bergeson noted Item 7D, West Shadow Ponds, wa e until July 9, 2001. Item 7H, Resolution No. 01 — 86, Lino Lakes Mar and Set Hearing, was postponed until July 9, 20 The agenda was approved as amended. CONSENT AGENDA rovements, Receive Feasibility Report Council Member O'Donnell o o+ �, ove the Consent Agenda, as presented. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. + on c ied unanimously. ITEM ACTION DISBURSEMENTS: June 25, 2001 (Check No. 61998 — 62188, $458,302.65) Centennial Fire District Approved Approved Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor License and Cabaret License for August Festival, St. Joseph Catholic Church Approved Request for an Exemption from Lawful Gambling License, St. Joseph Catholic Church Approved COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 OPEN MIKE No one was present for open mike. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK There was no Finance Department report. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH There was no Administration Department report. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA Consider Electrical Inspector Contract, Linda Waite Smith — Ci advised the City of Lino Lakes and Suburban Inspections have co for a renewal of electrical inspection services. The contract re contract agreement is a two -(2) year contract for the period d contract includes a change in insurance coverage. nistrator Waite Smith e necessary paperwork e July 1, 2001. The new 04 1 to July 1, 2003. The Council Member Dahl moved to approve the electrical co t, as presented. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried un imp fly. Consideration of Updating Electrical Pe Smith — City Administrator Waite Smit City of Lino Lakes and Suburban In fixed. Staff is requesting the City „° app the staff report. ough Suburban Inspections, Linda Waite at since the inception of a contract between the January 1, 1997, electrical permit fees have remain ove an increase in electrical permit fees as outlined in Council Member Carlson oved pprove an increase in electrical permit fees, as presented. Council Member O'Donn ed the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC SERVICES DEP IRTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER There was no Public Services Department report. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Jeff Smyser — Mayor Bergeson advised the City Council opened the public hearing on the draft Comprehensive Plan at the June 11, 2001, meeting. The hearing was continued to this evening. John Johnson, Director of Engineering for Metro Land Surveying and Engineering, stated he is speaking on behalf of Mr. Rehbein who owns a piece of property in the eastern part of Lino Lakes. He explained that interest has been expressed by two very large, nation -wide builders to develop Mr. • • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Rehbein's property but their investigation of the property indicated concern that the site was too narrow which will limit flexibility in site layout and design. Mr. Johnson requested the Council consider modifying that district shape to make it a little wider east to west, possibly to the 21st Street alignment. He noted that 21st Street will provide the sewer and water utilities for Mr. Rehbein's property. Scott Featherstone, 631 Andall Street, stated he lives in an area called Arena Acres and heard some of his neighbors voice their concern at the last meeting. He stated that when he becomes aware of potential developments within Lino Lakes, he asks himself two questions: What's this area going to look like two years from now? And, how is he going to avoid it. Mr. Featherstone stated he had these same questions when he heard of the Kohls/Target project. Mr. Featherstone stated he knew when he purchased his property 20 years ago that a road would go through the south section and that the 80 acres would be developed in some fashion or other. He urged the Council to consider three aspects: simplicity, moderation, and truthfulness. Mr. Featherstone suggested the Plan needs to be simple to understand to stration and loss of interest. He further suggested that moderation is needed to assure cern ' oiced are taken seriously and looked into Mr. Featherstone asked the Council to assur Co,•r:� ensive Plan is good for the Arena Acres residents and their lifestyle, as well as bein + • o t e City. Mr. Featherstone commented that change is hard and . r ce = sidents don't know what the development will look like or who will move in urge• Council to let residents become involved and have a hand in what is going on so Pey not become resentful or mistrust City government. Jeff Joyer, 8174 Lake Drive, stated he a and his wife operate Waldoch's Fa the Land Use Plan as medium den current zoning map. Mr. Joye Mr. Joyer stated they als stated he would welcome sides, the proposed growth property so it could be servi ,tarcels of land in Lino Lakes. He explained that he n Lake Drive and he just discovered it is identified on do- not show the current business zoning as shown on the ouncil to make this correction. a ° :I. ex at 900 and 996 Main Street, which has a septic system. r being provided to that property. He noted it adjoins, on two ea or up to 2010. Mr. Joyer asked that the boundary include his d by City services prior to 2010. He Art Hawkins, 6102 Centerville Road, read a prepared statement regarding the goal of 147 new units per year and a maximum population of 20,500 to the year 2020. He also quoted several articles from The Quad newspaper. Mr. Hawkins stated he believes there is a discrepancy between these goals and the table entitled "Lino Lakes Demographic Goals" as depicted on Page 65 of the Comprehensive Plan. He pointed out it shows the population for the year 2000 to be 14,540, not the official census figure of 16,791. He noted that at 147 units per year, the population would reach the 20,500 limit by the year 2006. Should that occur, he asked what would happen for the next 14 years until the year 2020. Or, if the City grows at the prescribed rate of 147 units per year, the population would reach 26,500 by the year 2020. Mr. Hawkins suggested that the Plan, as written, is not ready to go anywhere except back to the drawing board. 3 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Connie Grundhofer, 235 Linda Avenue, spoke in support of keeping open space in Lino Lakes to protect the flora and fauna, some of which is endangered. She commented on the importance of providing safe habitat, which also provides food for the animals and plants. Ms. Grundhofer noted that people, through not having the right knowledge or not planning correctly, have created deserts. She commented that while a desert will not be created in Lino Lakes, it would take a lot of special plants and animals that residents now enjoy. Donald Dunn, 6885 Blackduck Drive, offered two slogans: "This is a Comp Plan with flexibility for friends" and "How things got out of control in a Governor's office." He suggested that the Council are the "guards" and there is a need to ask, "Who is guarding the guards ?" Mr. Dunn stated his appreciation for the City providing a transcript of comments made at the last public hearing, which he found to be very helpful. Mr. Dunn again urged the Council to use the word "require" rather than the word "encourage." He noted that two weeks ago, he had asked the City to draft a document outlining how it can regulate the growth rate to stay within the limit. He suggested that such a documtfreb uld be prepared and signed by every member of the Council. Mr. Dunn read a quote f Plan relating to taxes and asked how the City is going to achieytthe o the City tax rate to 20 percent or lower through fiscal and lar 9 of the Comprehensive cctfve by 2020 of reducing lanning. Mr. Dunn spoke in favor of the shopping center and s aized e advantages he believes it will offer to the Lino Lakes citizens including, over tim an i ved tax rate. With regard to affordable housing, Mr. Dunn stated he believes the high d sit ` location land is inadequate and that the Town Center will not meet those needs since it is "hig Mr. Dunn stated he has done further thi ` o : e• subject of land use and does not believe that spot zoning is permitted any place in the '" u_gested the commercial change by the J -Mart is a spot zoning change, which he doe iev- should be allowed. Mr. Dunn then expressed concern with accelerating property Ph . i o = s I and asked how the City will be able to refuse future requests for development of la a ": t is not in the MUSA now He questioned if that is even legal and whether a conflict of taerest sts on the City Council. Mr. Dunn noted the land use public hearings were closed by tIr7 g & Zoning Board two or more years ago and he could find no legal evidence that it was ad ertised to the City's residents. Mr. Dunn concluded by suggesting that the residents of Lino Lakes should get something from the Comprehensive Plan. He urged the Council to take charge and put some requirements within the Plan. Mike Trehus, 675 Shadow Court, suggested that the Comprehensive Plan "talks out of both sides of its mouth" by indicating the City is going to control growth and do nice things for the environment, but does not contain "teeth" to assure it happens. He referenced the map identifying the MUSA and noted the Plan, if approved as it stands, would more than double the MUSA and add 2,100 additional acres 8 to 9 years from now. Mr. Trehus expressed his doubt that the City will be able to stay within the 147 homes per year rate. With regard to rezoning, which would occur later, Mr. Trehus asked if that can be considered a • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 • development right and, if so, how the City could tell the property owner they cannot develop because the City is beyond the 147 homes per year rate. • • Mr. Trehus commented on a 1998 series of advertisements "Myth or Reality ?" He pointed out that the map looks just like the Metropolitan Council's map. He suggested that an objective look at the facts would tell you what is reality and asked how there is still going to be 60 percent open space with this map. Mr. Trehus stated his concern for the environment which he believed was not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, a plan which he felt was more like a vision document. He encouraged the Council to assure residents are aware of all the issues and that the issues be worked out prior to adoption. Mr. Trehus reviewed the number of acres that are currently available for development and the rate of development proposed in the Comprehensive Plan, noting the map drives a need for more than 359 acres and the City is virtually past the 2010 goal already. He suggested you cannot demonstrate a need for MUSA based on the numbers and goals as stated in the Plan. Mr. Trehus noted that the Comprehensive Plan Task Force understood the Inventory Manageme n would be appended to the Comprehensive Plan. However, timing did not allow for that ccur s the result was a handbook for conservation development. He urged the Council Counci146 mu� of that tool and to further define greenways rather than moving forward with the Co 'v . an Mr. Trehus advised of a policy used by the City of L believed the proposed Comprehensive Plan does no ordinance and requirement for notification to go change. He noted that not all residents read Th everyone who owns land near a proposed Mr. Trehus stated if the Council abs maps for the reasons he has previo goals and not add 2,500 acres. and lets developers plan the C and tools, and all that is needed is to preserve rural character, which he e then addressed the notification idents within a certain distance of a land use d asked whether the City sent letters to to pass the Plan, he would urge them to remove the ted. n addition, he suggested the City list the housing stated he believes the Plan, as proposed, is a "blank check" emphasized that the City can do better, it has the knowledge ake the effort. Raymond Stadum, 663 An .".l 1 S reet, read a letter from Rod Kukonen, 647 Andall Street, which expressed concern about the roposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan, MUSA expansion, need for proper planning tools to be in place, and desire for the City to no longer be in a reactive mode with regard to proposed developments. Mr. Stadum stated that what is happening in Lino Lakes is not unique and, in fact, being replicated across the country. He commented on the public's perception that there is an unresponsive Council and faceless unelected bureaucrats making decisions which result in a nonrepresentative government. Mr. Stadum reviewed the nation's history and ideals to be governed by elected governing boards, not based on the notorious big "carrot" or "stick." Mr. Stadum stated the phrase "affordable housing" has a noble ring to it and all believe in the right to it, provided you can afford it. He quoted a newspaper article written by Eagan Mayor Awada regarding the need for housing policy decisions to reflect a consensus of the majority as expressed through their elected representatives and not be dictated by others (Metropolitan Council) outside of the community. Mr. Stadum read a quote indicating that "history is made by those who say no. It is COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 not made by people who just bend at the knee." Amy Donlin, 6100 Centerville Road, related the proposed Comprehensive Plan to an oil painting which is created by adding paint in layers, little by little. However, if the oil painting starts to get bad, and the artist cannot get back on track, it is painted over or thrown out and a fresh start made. She suggested that this is the point the Comprehensive Plan has reached, noting it contains many discrepancies in the numbers as discussed by Mr. Trehus. Ms. Donlin stated she believes the Comprehensive Plan presents a "blank check" to developers and a promise they will be allowed the privilege of being rezoned. Ms. Donlin stated the City has a responsibility to hold the population cap at 20,500 residents by the year 2020 to maintain a rural ambiance. She stated the residents of Lino Lakes do not want to be a "Roseville or Woodbury" and desire open spaces. Ms. Donlin concurred with the statements made by Connie Grundhofer about the residents' love for Lino Lakes' ecosystems, healthy communities of plants and animals, seeing the stars at night, and wildlife. She urged the Council to maintain those special values. Ms. Donlin commented on the greenways as identified on the y a's an3®' s g epancies in the southeast corner of the map. She asked how the area in Zone II, east o me ia, would be served with sewer if not by leap- frogging across her property. She sta s e t ready to bear the burden for a developer's sewage expense. Ms. Donlin advised tha ar idea " "fied on the map as low density sewered residential has been committed to the Min s ota ° AN Trust and will never be developed or sewered. She noted three areas on the map iden ied . _ reenways that are lakes of 200 acres in size or greater (Otter Lake, Lake Amelia, and Cedar ake). he believed this to be misleading and suggested those areas be colored blue and 'denli ater. Ms. Donlin commented on the importance of linked, contiguous green - ed as walking paths or for wildlife passage. In conclusion, Ms. Donlin stated she b e are certain areas within the Comprehensive Plan that should be painted over with white` ± .. esh art made. Mayor Bergeson asked if there 'anyo e else who has not had a chance to speak last week or tonight. No one came forward. Council Member O'Donne mo'ed to close the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motio carried unanimously. Mr. Alan Brixius, NAC, stated the Comprehensive Plan does have many layers and the Plan does provide for zoning, implementation strategies, environmental policies, and it does include the Environmental Handbook. All of those issues will be put into City ordinances. Until a Plan is adopted, the City does not have a way to manage growth. All of the details, rules and regulations will be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council as the ordinances are approved. He stated the Plan is not a rezoning plan. The Plan and map is a way to define future land uses. It does not give development rights to anyone. The MUSA request is less than 400 acres. The map does give property owners a right to pursue MUSA. Mayor Bergeson asked for clarification from the City Attorney regarding comments from the Council before a motion is made. The City Attorney advised Council Members can make comments before a • • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 motion is made unless Council Members have an issue with that. Mayor Bergeson indicated he had read a statement before the last meeting regarding the Comprehensive Plan. He highlighted some of the points from that statement noting that some of the suggested details of the Plan will be addressed in future City ordinances. Council Member Carlson asked for clarification regarding the "first come first serve" statement relating to MUSA and the area east of Arena Acres. Mr. Brixius stated the only way for the City to take applications for development is on a first come first service basis. The City has restrictions and certain features will be necessary before applications are reviewed. He stated he did not mean to imply that the City will take anything or ever type of development as long as there is MUSA. He stated the area near Arena Acres was reviewed and it was determined there was the opportunity to blend in the area if sewer was available. The City can look at greater diversity to better blend the area. He noted the difference between buildable acres compared to gross acres. There are opportunities that the City can use to prov w 4fral ities within the City that work. Conservation ordinances will also be developed to maintai re envi nment. Council Member Dahl asked how much 20,000 square feet e rixius advised 20,000 square feet is a little less than l an acre. Mayor Bergeson asked for clarification how land in Mr. Brixius stated the lakes on the map should Trust also should be corrected on the map he a rust will relate to the proposed zoning. ed. Land that has been donated to Land Mayor Bergeson noted the map was up . :. •, n as possible. He stated the greenways on the map are not exact but are conceptu Mr. Brixius advised the green they are connected. There wi preserve them. Wildlife idors very conceptual and as de preserve will be looked at. eptual in nature. The City will want to make sure that oth . "'blic and private ownership of the greenways as a way to also be provided for. Staff recognizes that the greenways are comes in more details of resource inventory and which areas to Council Member O'Donnell thanked the citizens who have made comments on the Plan. He stated this process has been a very difficult process and many factors go into making this decision. He stated the Council tried very hard to keep the original visions of the Plan, citizen survey, and 20/20 Vision Plan, as well as previous Councils' visions. This Council has worked as a team and never intended to do anything that wasn't above board relating to informing all residents of the process. He stated he needs a tool to review development. He stated he is obligated to have a finding of fact to approve or deny any project. The City has nothing right now to do that. He stated he believes that the Plan gives the City that tool to regulate what will happen within the City. He stated he is prepared to support the Plan keeping in mind the numbers that are within the Plan. • Council Member Reinert stated he also appreciates all comments made, although it has been very difficult not to respond. He stated most people in the City do not want high growth or high density, COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 noting he is one of those people. Anyone concerned with that should support this Plan. The City does not have a tool right now to stop development. The Council cannot simply say no at this time. The Council will be able to after the Plan is adopted. He stated there seems to be a misunderstanding about the Plan. The Plan is only a guideline, not a blueprint. The ordinances will be a build out of the Plan. City Councils will have the final say as to how the City develops. He referred to a letter he received from a resident regarding a concern relating to accelerated dense population growth in Lino Lakes. He stated growth is not accelerated but has been out of control. He stated the City needs this Plan to stop that. The Plan allows for options. The 147 number of homes per year is a guideline. He stated he is not in favor of dense population growth. The Plan has kept the growth rate the same, cut the MUSA down, allowed for 2.5 average units per acre, and changed the definition of low, medium and high density. The revision of the density definitions changes the map completely. He stated he does not believe the Plan is a perfect plan but many compromises have been made and it is a good Plan. He read a statement regarding the amount of high density and what neighboring communities are doing relating to that issue. He noted the Council did not do any illegal spot zoning. A good Plan will be a tool for the control of growth. The Plan will not make everyone happy. He stated he is very enthusiastic about the Plan. Council Member Carlson stated the Council did not raise the 7 City of Lino Lakes made the top of one chart in the census married families with children which has added to the po for their comments noting it is clear that some citizen'; should be changed and how the City has changed. She responsibility to continue and enhance quality c'ty represent the goals, values and interests of the c the City into the future. She stated it was Comprehensive Plan Task Force. The tas completed their work on the Plan. I and vote on it. The Council did re changes made on the Plan wer information and the Council's comments from City Bo the community and the di A current initiative by the h ld goal. She noted the has the largest number of th. She also thanked everyone pposi e views about how the Plan s aka he believes it is the Council's ices, maintain the fiscal health of the City, d community, govern effectively and lead sibility of this Council to be the s authorized by previous Councils and had er the responsibility of this Council to review the Plan e P1 ` and sent it to the City Boards for comment. The x� ve and were based on the passage of time, new nsibi ity to the community. The Council did consider all ens. The Council represents a whole spectrum of those found in 'did become heated. The previous Council did not pass the Plan. olitan Council, which becomes effective next year, would etro necessitate further changes. f is time to complete the work that so many have contributed to, to pass the Comprehensive Plan and to move forward together. Council Member Dahl thanked the citizens and City Boards for their help, guidance and comments. She also thanked the Comprehensive Task Force. She stated the Council has incorporated a lot from each Board and ordinances will make the Plan even better. If the Plan is not passed, the City is allowing things to get out of control again. The Plan has to be passed to keep growth on track. She thanked her fellow Council Members for being gracious to each other noting that at times the meetings were very emotional. She stated she believes the City has the best of everything with this Plan. Mayor Bergeson stated there has been some confusion between density and affordability. Concerns about densities is different than affordability. Everyone should be concerned about affordability and 8 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 the community and City Council have to work on that. That issue is not specifically outlined in the Plan. The Plan does address density. He stated he feels there is an obligation to make sure people who want to live in Lino Lakes can afford to. The Plan is a compromise between everyone involved. He stated he believes that some growth in the community is a good thing. It is very important that growth is well planned, orderly and maintains high standards. The 147 number is a compromise and he indicated he does support that number. The 20,500 number has not been abandoned. The average of 147 homes per year is an average from 1998 to 2020. Because that number has been exceeded, at some point the development will have to decrease to reach the average. He stated he believes the Plan is de- accelerated growth as compared to accelerated growth. However, the Plan is a consensus of the City Council. Mayor Bergeson noted that Council Member Dahl does own property that was considered for a change of designation. The Council felt that she should not be excluded from requesting a change. The Council did review the request, which was presented by Mr. Dahl at the same time that other requests were made. The question is whether it is appropriate for Council Member Dahl to vote. A suggestion was made that there be two (2) motions: one for the Corr, live Plan minus the Land Use Map, Resolution No 01 - 88, and one for the Land Use Map, oluti No 01 - 89. Council Member Dahl would abstain from the second vote. The Coun ally agreed that two (2) separate motions will be made. Mayor Bergeson moved to propose that the City Cou. "tivo on o (2) separate motions: one for the Comprehensive Plan, Resolution No 01 — 88, and on ' ►the Land Use Map, Resolution No 01 - 89. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the nlion. '` otion carried with Council Member Dahl abstaining. Council Member Carlson moved to adope .: No. 01 — 88, as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Mayor Bergeson stated the Co has done that. It is in the bes have passed the Plan and Council Member Reinert v Council Member Carlson vo led to come to a consensus and he believes the Council st of e City to pass the Plan now. The previous Council should should have passed it before now. ed ea. Council Member Dahl voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. d yea. Council Member O'Donnell voted yea. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 01 — 89, as presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Mayor Bergeson stated the City did have some requests for changes that just came in. The Council had agreed that there was a cut off date for requests. He stated he believes there will always be requests for changes and there is a process to follow to request a change. He indicated he hopes that most of the Land Use Map stays intact, especially to 2010. There will be revisions to the Land Use • Map. COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Council Member Dahl abstained. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Council Member Carlson voted yea. Council Member O'Donnell voted yea. Council Member Reinert voted yea. Motion carried with Council Member Dahl abstaining. Mayor Bergeson thanked everyone involved with the Plan. He stated the City will move ahead with the submission to the Metropolitan Council. The City has a lot of work to do on new ordinances and that work can no begin. Resolutions No. 01 — 88 and No. 01 — 89 can be found in the City Clerk's office. Resolution No. 01— 82, Variance, Glenn Valentine, 64th Street and 20th Avenue, (3/5 Vote Required), Jeff Smyser — City Planner Smyser advised Mr. Glenn Valentine of Ventura Homes has applied for a variance from the required setback from a collector road. The site lies between I -35E and 20th Avenue (Co. Rd. 54). Most of the site is wetland. Only a small portion of the site is upland: the area along 20th Avenue. Variances from required road setbacks eeded if a house and driveway are to be built. Some wetland fill will be required. City Planner Smyser presented the staff analysis of the a o o 'n that in all requests for Y Y P Y app � � q variance and in taking subsequent action, the City shall rn 1. That the property in question canno be pu reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the officia ,cont 2. That the plight of the lando property not created by t o physical circumstances unique to his 3. That the hardship ism doe to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the pro . i under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That gran ': the fiance request will not confer on the applicant any special privilege th to be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same E stri 't. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. City Planner Smyser advised the Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the application at its June 13 meeting and recommended approval based on conditions. Staff is also recommending approval based on conditions. Council Member O'Donnell asked if there will be any utilities in that area in the foreseeable future. City Engineer Powell advised the area is in Sewer District 5. There will not be any utility service in the near future. Council Member O'Donnell asked if there is room on the property for a second septic location if the current sewer fails. City Planner Smyser advised the survey does show a location for another septic 10 • • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 system. Mayor Bergeson clarified that the setback will be 10 feet and asked if the roadway is a County road. He also asked if the County will eventually need additional right -of -way. City Planner Smyser advised the setback will be 10 feet, which is the reason for the variance. City Engineer Powell added that the roadway is a County road. The County has commented on the variance request and indicated they have no current plans for reconstruction. City Planner Smyser advised that Anoka County has informed the City that it foresees the need for an additional five -(5) feet of right -of -way on each side of the road. If this occurs, the garage and driveway will be only five (5) feet from the ROW. While this is an undesirable situation, it is a tradeoff between being closer to the road and filling more wetland. The City cannot simply prevent the property owner from using the land. Council Member O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 01 — 8 =v° on the following conditions: 1. Building permit must be obtained fort = s '` t r - . 2. Applicant must obtain approv. we land an from the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Council Member O'Donnell clarified the e d �ed condition #3 regarding the feasibility of a wetland treatment system for the se City Planner Smyser stated th normal septic may be detrimen septic system as long as i it as no merit. £' oncern from Planning and Zoning Board Members that a the fetlands. There is no threat to the wetlands from a normal rddesigned and constructed. Mayor Bergeson inquired a " out ow much wetland would need to be filled to move the house. City Planner Smyser referred to aa ap and advised the entire house pad and driveway would have to be filled. Mayor Bergeson expressed concern relating to a house being that close to the right -of -way. Motion carried with Mayor Bergeson voting no. Resolution No. 01 — 82 can be found in the City Clerk's office. Resolution No. 01— 83, Minor Subdivision, Brian Iverson, 20th Avenue, Jeff Smyser — City Planner Smyser advised the application is to remove a portion of and from one parcel and attach it to the adjacent parcel. That is, the action will move the lot line ten feet. The existing property line follows the 1/4 section line. The application is to move that property line ten feet to the east. The COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 reason is to increase the size of the western parcel to make it a full 20 acres. The applicant has a buyer for the parcel (Parcel B) who wants a full 20 acres. In addition, the action would combine into the eastern parcel a narrow strip of land along I -35E, which currently is a separate tax parcel. All of the land involved is under the same ownership. City Planner Smyser presented the staff analysis of the application noting the Planning and Zoning Board considered the application at the June 13 meeting. The potential buyer of the property, Mr. Bill Walton, addressed the Planning and Zoning Board. Mr. Walton did not want the 66 -foot easement. The Planning and Zoning Board recommends adding a condition of approval that the 66- foot easement not be included. As explained in the staff report, Mr. Iverson is the owner of all the property. From the City's perspective, if a landowner wants to record an access easement over his own property, it is not a City concern. The City's interests are not affected either way, and there is no City obligation involved. Staff's recommendation is to approve the subdivision as submitted. Council Member O'Donnell clarified that the proposal is to a the easement. City Planner Smyser advised the Planning a including the easement. City staff feels the easement shod` no minor subdivision without g Bd d recommended not e addressed. Mayor Bergeson asked if the applicant is going to r basement. The applicant indicated he is going to record th Mayor Bergeson stated the back lot is n• A o .ornung. With a recorded easement, the lot will be less non - conforming. He encouraged th a . 'c. Ito record the easement. Council Member Dahl moved Reinert seconded the motion. lution No. 01 — 83, as presented. Council Member n c . " ied unanimously. Resolution No. 01 — 83 c. ; :' �� d in the City Clerk's office. Resolution No. 01— 85, Amend Condition of Approval for Site Plan, North American Composites, Jeff Smyser — City Planner Smyser advised the City Council approved a minor subdivision and site building plan for North American Composites on November 13, 2000. One of the conditions of approval was: 3. The precast concrete panels will be Fabcon Wide Rack 3/8" grooves at 3" O.C. with a smooth concrete cattail design, or similar design. Decorative concrete block on the office portion of the building shall be either smooth burnished concrete block or rock -face block. This originated in a request by the Planning and Zoning Board to revisit the building elevation along the freeway. Because this is a very visible location, the Planning and Zoning Board asked for some additional attention to aesthetics. In response, the applicant then submitted a revised south elevation 12 • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 that includes a custom "cattail" pattern in the concrete panels. Thought the Planning and Zoning Board did not see the new pattern, the revision was included in the project review by the City Council and was specified in the condition of approval listed above. North American Composites has asked that this condition be deleted because of the cost of the custom design. Instead, they have submitted a design that includes a four (4) foot blue strip across the top of the precast concrete panels. The panels have a raked finish, just like the original submitted. In addition, the design of the building has been revised somewhat. The office portion exterior will still be decorative concrete block. However, the standing seam metal roof on both portions of the building has been changed in the new design. Instead, the new proposed design has a flat roof for the warehouse portion. The office portion also has a flat roof, but the east elevation incorporates a peaked facade. The footprint of the new design increases the footprint by about 500 sf, about a 2% change. Staff considers this a relatively minor change. Because the cattail design was a condition of approval, it will dire ? „ by the City Council to change it. Staff recommends approving the new building design isin''he condition of approval to delete the sentence regarding the cattail design. Conditio ur (4) would thus read: 4. The warehouse portion „ . be pr ` ast concrete panels and the office portion of the building shall be decor • rock -face block as indicated on the exterior elevations by Stiglich Co c., dated 5/1/01. City Planner Smyser noted the Plan Council Member Reinert state more appealing. He aske staf current proposal is an imp ping Board recommended approval of the request. origi 7al goal was to have a different look to the building that is Is that has been accomplished. City Planner Smyser stated the over some buildings that are currently on the freeway. Council Member Carlson m ed to adopt Resolution No. 01 — 85, as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Council Member Carlson clarified that the Council previously discussed this issue and directed staff to present the proposal to the Planning and Zoning Board. The Planning and Zoning Board did approve the current proposal. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 01 — 85 can be found in the City Clerk's office. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 11— 01, Rezoning Lot 9 Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Community National Bank, Jeff Smyser — City Planner Smyser advised the City Council approved COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 the first reading of Ordinance 11 — 01 on June 11, 2001. As a reminder, the application is to rezone an existing lot to provide for the expansion of the parking lot for the Community National Bank. The lot currently is zoned Neighborhood Business, which does no allow banks. Rezoning the site to General Business will match the existing bank lot zoning. If the City Council approved the second reading, the ordinance will be published in the newspaper the first week of July. The rezoning will be effective 30 days after publication, as required by the City Charter. Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 11 — 01, as presented. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Council Member Carlson voted yea. Council Member O'Donnell voted yea. Council Member Reinert voted yea. Council Member Dahl voted yea. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 11 — 01 can be found in the City Clerk's office. FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 10 — 01, Rezoning; FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 09 — 01, Comprehensive Plan Amendment; and Resolution No. 01— 77, Preliminary Plat, Saddle Club, Heritage Development, Al Brixius (NAC) — Mr. Brixius noted this application was originally scheduled for the June 11 meeting. At the work session June 6, the City Council directed staff to request a two -(2) week postponement from the applicant. The applicant agreed to postpone the project to the June 25 meeting. Mr. Brixius advised Heritage Development has submitted an application for comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning, and preliminary plat for a portion of an area included in their application for preliminary plat. The property is commonly known as the Saddle Club and is located south and east of Old Birch Street. Mr. Brixius presented his analysis of the application noting the Environmental Board reviewed the application and recommended that the tree preservation be better well defined, raised concern regarding 70 houses being platted and relationship to the total lots platted in the community, request to reduce the lot areas in Block 2 so the area could be included in the greenway. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the application and they recommended denial of the application in its entirety. The Board did not provide specific reasons for their action although their discussion included concerns regarding availability of MUSA and provisions for utility service in the area. Mr. Brixius advised staff recommended approval to the Planning and Zoning Board and continues to support approval of the application based on the conditions outlined in the staff report. Council Member Carlson asked if the access from Old Birch was obtained. 14 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 410 Mr. John Hill, Heritage Development, stated the property owner to the west is in the process of processing the right -of -way. • • Council Member Reinert asked why there is a hold up on that processing. Mr. Hill stated there are legal technicalities holding up that processing. There is no issue with the processing it just takes time. Mayor Bergeson stated the Council previously discussed the issue of screening where the street exists to Killdeer. He asked if a condition can be added that staff will work with the develop on that issue. City Planner Smyser stated a condition can be added that the developer shall install screening as recommended by staff. Mr. Hill indicated he will work with staff on the screening issue. Council Member O'Donnell stated there was a question regardin City policy pertaining to double frontage lots. City Planner S the two -(2) lots that will be created as double frontage lots. lot. He stated the park dedication has been clarified and t actual trail corridor. The remainder will be a cash dedcatio in th ion to Killdeer and the to a map and pointed out is is only for a portion of the will receive credit only for the amount of $56,710. Council Member Reinert stated that when the Counci, eviously reviewed the plat there was a problem. City Planner Smyser advised the configurations of the lots were looked at over and over There is a lot of wetlands and the lots may • • e'° enough. He stated it may be better to save the environment and put the road in as prop Council Member Carlson suggest . ': • • of P''e Council be taken before a motion is made. She stated she has many concerns e. • • e resolved before she can approve the application. Her concerns include the access fro U d Bi ch, utilities, the need to cul -de -sac east of Old Birch, the road connection running the b ksof the lots. She stated the previous plat did show full size lots. She also expressed conce Environmental Board did not review this plat. The Planning and Zoning Board did recomm d d vial of the application. There is not enough in the MUSA reserve. She stated she believes all t se issues need to be taken care of before the application is approved. She referred to the problems that occurred with Henry Street. Mr. Hill stated the previous plat that was reviewed was conceptual. He noted he was not allowed to buy more property than he did. Council Member Carlson stated there have been other problems with purchasing property such as what occurred in Bluebill Ponds. She stated things need to be finalized before she can support this project. Mayor Bergeson stated the issue is not Bluebill Ponds and it is inappropriate to refer to that development. He asked if a cul -de -sac will be developed. City Engineer Powell advised the cul -de- sac was a recommendation that came from the feasibility study. There is no requirement for a cul -de- 15 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 sac. Mayor Bergeson stated that he does not see the sewer coming from Birch Street as a disadvantage. The developer is paying for sewer that will service more than his property. He stated the MUSA issue is an issue that the City is going to have to face and sees no reason to save it. He added he believes that the City will have to request some of the proposed allocation of 2010 MUSA. Mr. Brixius advised the City asked for MUSA reserve a few years ago. That MUSA was intended to be for residential growth on the south side of the City. The City will have to slow down its growth when there is no more MUSA. Council Member Reinert asked who will pay for the cul -de -sac on Old Birch. City Engineer Powell stated the developer is not causing the City to construct a cul -de -sac. The cul -de -sac was recommended from the feasibility study to eliminate traffic concerns. The cul -de -sac is not part of the recommendation. This development raised the issue. There is a bad corner there that has been bad for a long time. Council Member Reinert asked why the Environmental Board v' " this application. City Planner Smyser advised the Environmental Board did revie oje The Environmental Board wants to hold on to project until they are comfortable wit pass it.on. City ordinances will have to be changed to do that. Council Member Carlson stated there have sign c' ant to the plan since the Environmental Board originally reviewed it. City Planner Sm - r stater the plan has had a number of revisions. The Environmental Board has seen several plans. The City cannot hold things up because of state law and deadlines. Mayor Bergeson asked where the f iron the deadline noting there has already been one postponement. City Planner S s . a• d a decision needs to be made this evening or the applicant can request another p •neme t. If another postponement is made, the Council needs to tell the applicant what they want Council Member O' Donne stat = d there are open items that need to be completed. He asked if the applicant will agree to a pos . onement as long as there is a specific list of items to address. Mayor Bergeson suggested the Council give the applicant a few minutes to consider a postponement. The Council will continue this discussion after the applicant has made a decision. Resolution No. 01— 86, Lino Lakes Marketplace Improvements, Receive Feasibility Report and Set Hearing, (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell — Upon adoption of the agenda, this item was postponed until the July 9, 2001, City Council meeting. Consideration to Accept 2001 Environmental Board Goals, Marty Asleson - Mayor Bergeson stated a Council Member and staff member have suggested the action on the Environmental Board 2001 Goals be postponed because the Chair of the Environmental Board is not present this evening. He recommended this item be tabled until the next Council meeting. 16 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Council Member Dahl moved to table the 2001 Environmental Board Goals to the July 9, 2001, City Council meeting. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Letter of Intent, Village Development, Mary Alice Divine — Economic Development Assistant Divine advised RMF Entities, Ltd and Duffy Development are interested in entering into an exclusive development contract with the City of Lino Lakes to develop Phase I of the Village. This phase comprises approximately 7.5 acres of City -owned land in the Village. This development team is interested in developing a mixed -use area consisting of retail, office and senior apartments. Staff has been working through a number of City and developer responsibilities that would be required to enter into an exclusive development arrangement. This letter of intent will be the basis for completing a development agreement. The key elements that would be included in a development agreement de: • An agreement to work cooperatively with other entitie plan in integrated development • Granting exclusive development rights for a p, iod a tim- subject to reasonable extensions if delays are out of the developers' control • Completion by the developer of market r • Completion by the City of publi the Comprehensive Plan, re with the YMCA roject budgets, concept plans and financing ents feasibility, inclusion of the Village plan into e second access into the site, finalization of plans • Cooperative efforts to fi v. wi win resolution to finalizing site assembly • Inclusion of design t ds for Village development • Cost sharing of preli 'nary sketches for Village marketing purposes • Responsibilities for public versus private consulting services This letter is not a final or binding contract, it is a combined effort of staff and the developers to narrow down the steps required to move forward with a development agreement. However, staff is recommending that the Council take action on this letter of intent to demonstrate that the City is willing to pursue this course for Phase I Village development. Economic Development Director Wessel added that it is important to move forward with this project. City staff needs time to prepare the development agreement for Council approval. Council Member Reinert moved to approve the Letter of Intent with RMF Entities and Duffy 17 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Development, as presented. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Council Member Carlson stated she is happy to see this come forwards and also glad that it states it is not final or binding because some of the elements are out of the City's control. She stated she does have concerns about the financial aspect to the City regarding the Tagg property. She stated she will support this item. Mayor Bergeson asked if the $2,000 figure for preliminary sketches is total or for both the City and developer. Economic Development Assistant Divine advised $2,000 is the total figure. Mayor Bergeson asked if the City's amount can come out of another fund. Economic Development Assistant Divine stated another funding source is not available for the City's share. Motion carried unanimously. Continuation of Saddle Club Discussion — Mr. Hill stated it seem plat itself. He requested a poll of the Council regarding the Com rezone. He stated the right -of -way issue with Birch Street an condition of approval. e problems are with the Plan amendment and ues can be made into a Council Member Reinert stated he knows of eleven ottan forward with this project. Mr. Hill noted some of the issues are out of his Council Member Reinert stated the Cou es. He indicated he cannot move onsider all aspects of the project and the surrounding area Some issue may + " o he developer's control but they still exists. The City Attorney advised an o�� al`1, of the Council can be taken Council Member Reinert 6 ted h not support the application. she is Council Member Dahl state concerned about a shortage of MUSA, the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Bod, and the sewer going east/west instead of north/south. She added that the lots are larger than R1 -X but it is not zoned R1 -X. She stated she is leaning towards a no vote on all three(3) items because she would like to see everything done before it comes before the Council. Mayor Bergeson advised he can support all three (3) items that need action. Council Member Carlson stated she would vote no on all three (3) items noting that there are some issues the developer can control. Council Member O'Donnell stated he would vote yes on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezone and possibly yes to the preliminary plat with conditions that include securing access on the west side and an agreement for screening with the property owners to the north. He stated without those conditions he would vote no to the preliminary plat. 18 • • • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Mr. Hill stated that if the application is postponed he would like a detailed list of what needs to be taken care of to the Council's satisfaction. Mayor Bergeson stated a list can be developed with the help of staff. Mr. Hill indicated he will accept a postponement to the July 9, 2001, Council meeting. Mayor Bergeson stated that Council Members should give a list of issues to staff. When this application comes before Council again, only those issues should be addressed. Council Member Carlson stated that her outstanding issues include the access from Old Birch, which direction the utilities will come from, the cul -de -sac, road connection to Kildeer, approval of screening from the neighbors, and the reason for denial from the Planning and Zoning Board. Mr. Hill stated there was no substantial reason given by Planning and Zoning Board Members. He stated he does not believe the request is an unusual request for the s., 'fie "° half of the property. City Planner Smyser stated that when asked, the Planning and ins.. '• gave no reason for denial. Council Member Carlson inquired about the costs of ,t Powell stated the direction of the sewer will not affet cost will be absorbed by the developer. If they costs. The City will pay for the rest. The direc $60,000 if for going under Birch and ease Council Member Reinert stated he i Planning and Zoning Board denial, possibility of the developer do Mayor Bergeson noted a Powell stated those lots w Farms. road and ewer and water. City Engineer the ' i. If the sewer comes from the west, the the north there will be $60,000 additional sewer is a Council decision. The additional on costs. erned about issues that include the access to Old Birch, e bae yard to backyard situation. He suggested the e cost of reconstructing Old Birch due to traffic concerns. ber :'double frontage lots were created on Birch Street. City Engineer skrat Run and there are also double frontage lots in Wenzel City Administrator Waite Smith expressed concern that staff may not be not be able to obtain a reason for denial from the Planning and Zoning Board. Staff already requested that information and there is not another Planning and Zoning Board meeting before the next Council meeting. Council Member Carlson suggested Council Members review the minutes from the meeting or obtain an expanded version of the minutes on that section. Mayor Bergeson suggested staff type up a list of outstanding issues and give it to the Council and developer as soon as possible. 4111 City Planner Smyser verified the outstanding issues the Council is concerned about. COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Mayor Bergeson stated the City and developer should be able to address all the outstanding issues before the next Council meeting. Mr. Tome VonBische, Heritage Development, came forward and stated the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Board meeting were pulled and reviewed. No reason for denial was given. The closest to a reason was the City standards for R -1. The only understandable concern is the access issue. He stated he is very concerned that reference to Bluebill Ponds has been made. That project was very expensive and the road and utilities were a problem. He stated he does not like the idea that there may be bias from that project. Heritage Development has tried to comply with the City in every way. The Planning and Zoning Board just did not want the road. It makes sense to plat this property. Heritage Development has done a legitimate job in the City of Lino Lakes. Mayor Bergeson thanked the developers for their patience. He stated that hopefully an answer will be given at the next Council meeting. Council Member Reinert added he is not connecting anything to B1uebil °LQnds. He is just looking at the proposed plat and all the outstanding issues. Council Member O'Donnell moved to table FIRST READING (i ' e 09 — 01, Comprehensive Plan Amendment: MUSA Allocation; FIRST READING,°` rdin nc 0 — 01, Rezoning; Resolution No. 01 - 77, Preliminary Plat, Saddle Club, Old Birc to the July 9, 2001, City Council meeting. it Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motio •mac nanimously. UNFINISHED BUSINESS May 29, 2001, City Council Minutes 2001, City Council Minutes, as prese carried unanimously. mber O'Donnell moved to approve the May 29, uncil Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion June 6, Council Work Sessio nute Council Member Carlson referred to page 2, paragraph 4, and corrected it to read " ,• no i velopment Director Wessel noted that he has heard...". Council Member Carlson ved to approve the June 6, 2001, Council Work Session Minutes, as amended. Council Member einert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. June 11, 2001, City Council Minutes — Council Member Carlson referred to page 2, paragraph 1, and corrected the spelling of Ann Boeckman. She referred to page 4, paragraph 7, and corrected the spelling of Raymond Stadum. She referred to page 5, paragraph 2, and corrected the spelling of Bart Rehbein. Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve the June 11, 2001, City Council Minutes, as amended. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS - None COMMUNITY CALENDAR JUNE 26, 2001 THROUGH JULY 9, 2001: 20 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Environmental Board Meeting, Wednesday, June 27, 2001, 6:30 p.m. Park Board Meeting, Monday, July 2, 2001, 6:30 p.m. City Hall Closed, Wednesday, July 4, 2001, Independence Day, Council Work Session Canceled City Council Meeting, Monday, July 9, 2001, 6:30 p.m. ADJOURN There being no further business, Council Member O'Donnell moved to adjourn at 10:40 p.m. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council, :_, July 9, 2001. Jl, Transcribed by: Kim Points TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • • • EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES EXCERPT OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT DATE : June 25, 2001 MEMBERS PRESENT : Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson MEMBERS ABSENT : None COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Jeff Smyser — (Mayor Bergeson advised the City Council opened the public hearing on the draft Comprehensive Plan at the June 11, 2001, meeting. The hearing was continued to this evening.) MAYOR BERGESON: Umm, let me see the hands of those o d + not comment last time who want to comment tonight. (inaudible) All right, we'll bm er e and then come back and (inaudible) MR. JOHNSON: Mayor and members of th , I'm John Johnnson, Director of Engineering for Metro Land Surveying and Engi . I'm ere tonight on behalf of Mr. Rehbein, on a piece of property that he has in the Compre ensive "lan located in the eastern part of the community. Ahh, our presence here tonig • +it. - d because of interests that have been Y P g P "�� expressed by two very large, nation -wid- s Hers t at have approached Mr. Rehbein and wanting to investigate development of the prope . c ently proposed to be guided medium high density. And, their analysis of the site indi . °` + it c cern that the narrowness of the site, the long linear nature limits their flexibility in and design. We're here tonight to enter into the record for the public hearing, and to ask y Council to consider, maybe, modifying that district shape in some fashion as we mov orwar. ; + Pugh the planning process to make it a little wider east/west, probably over to about 21 . where 21st Street may get built in the future. Twenty -first Street will provide the sewer and water access for property in this area because of where the existing trunk utilities are currently in Main Street. But, I think the important part tonight is for us to, ahh, request that your consideration be given. I believe copies of the letter and a map that we're talking about was included in your packets. If not, I have extra copies with me tonight. (inaudible) But, I ahh, and then I'm here, you know, to try to say there is an issue that we would like to, some flexibility in, ahh, being able to design. I don't know if this is, ahh, would like to, I don't know, if you respond tonight I suspect that you would be doing your addressing of issues at some other point in time, possibly. But, that's our point. If you have any questions, I'd be glad to answer them. Thank you. MAYOR BERGESON: And, if you could spell your name please. EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 MR. FEATHERSTONE: I could do that. MAYOR BERGESON: (Inaudible) MR. FEATHERSTONE: My name is Scott Featherstone, F- e- a- t- h- e- r- s- t- o -n -e. I live at 631 Andall Street in an area that used to be called, or may still be known as Arena Acres. I was at the Council meeting two weeks ago, heard some of my neighbors speak, in what I would consider a rather emotional plea to the Council about the 80 acres that's just east of my property. I think that there are two things that you ought to know about me. First, I didn't put any of you in the seat that you're at. And, nor, did I hinder your election. I keep my involvement in City government very limited. When the stadium was up over on the east side of Lino Lakes my two questions were: What's this area going to look like two years from now? And, how am I going to avoid it? The Kohls/Target project, I had the same questions. What would it look like? And, how am I going to avoid it. I bring you three things tonight that I think are very important. to what you're going to do. I knew when I purchased the pro road going through the south section of my land and that t;t fashion or another. n changing your minds as ago that there would be a ould be developed in some But, the three things that I bring you are simplicity. • eratio , and truthfulness. The Plan, I have not seen yet. But, I think that it's simple enoughhat yo can explain it to me in a fashion that it would be able to be explained to a 12 year . clued; Ho many houses are you going to put there? How much land are you going to use? aye • • e going to get in and out That is something that I can understand. If it gets too `• m. complex than that, I will get frustrated, lose interest and become angry. That's t w. I . I'm not fond of it but I'il work on that I think that, ahh, the moderati • > of t%'ngs would be that once you get a ball rolling, it is harder to stop it and more spendy t stop it tea to, perhaps, start it rolling initially. Four people at the last meeting spoke from my - : his some concern on what's going on. I think you need to look into what's happening over ere. Is it necessary? The truthfulness of the matter here would be that if your Plan is good for the Arena Acres people and their lifestyle, if the Plan is good for the City, why don't we know about it? I would think that somebody, if this Plan is as good as it should be, would be letting people know and taking credit for that great idea. Change is hard and change is scary. I don't know what it's going to look like. I don't know who's going to move in. I heard talk of, what do they call them, affordable housing. In these times, I sometimes feel that's an oxymoron. Affordable housing? With the jobs that are coming into Lino Lakes and the pay that would be paid them, I don't know how anyone makes a go of family and house ownership on wages that a Kohl's or a Target would pay. I'm not sure if you have a model that you're planning this after. I don't know if it's tried and true. I would like to know. I do know that people will remember what it is you do there if you come up short. People are more apt to remember your shortcomings and the things that go wrong than they do • • • EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 • your successes. Without allowing people to have a hand in what's going on, then they'll become resentful and they will mistrust the City government and that will last long past this Council standing. • • I urge you to relook at what you are going to do, to consider the neighborhood, to consider the people, to listen to the people. Because, as I understand the City, a City is made up of people, businesses, and buildings. The buildings house the people and the businesses. The businesses support, or I should say the people support the businesses and it's the people that are the City. And, you are, certainly, the City. Let us know what your plans are. Let us have a part in it. You'll find the Arena Acre people very willing to cooperate with you. Thank you very much. MAYOR BERGESON: Thank you. Way in the back. Mr. Joyer. MR. JOYER: Hello. I'm Jeff Joyer, J- o- y -e -r, (8174 Lake Drive) here to talk about two parcels that I own in the City of Lino Lakes. A couple simple, ahh, specifically request if I might. Ahh, for starters, my wife and I own and operate Walnut Farm, althou e operates it more than I do (laughter) located on Lake Drive, about a half a mile, three -qu . r s mi ° north of Main Street. That property, I discovered this morning, shows up on the propod d `e Plan as, ahh, basically medium density, ahh, etc. But, specifically not showing the ctirre bum sses' zoning on the current zoning map. So, I'm asking for a, what I think is a correctin, ayR an oversight regarding that specific, ahh, piece of property. We do have, ahh, 39 acres r sow e. The general business is about eight acres. It's a, it's a, in a previous meeting, proba. #}O years ago, it was, it might even be 15, 18 years ago, it was described as 600 feet of fron :. :• ng L e Drive and approximately as deep. And, it does, it does show up on the, ahh, zonin Ww map. urrently it's kind of an odd configuration but it does recognize the current business is lik to y ere and expand as Lino grows. So, that's ahh, one change I'd like to propose. Also, umm, I, as I got a copy of th Main Street, 990, 996, and it a for that property. And, it is a would ask that the bound incl sooner than 2010. rning and found there is a duplex that I own on, ahh, it's actually on a septic system and I would welcome sewer one o sides the proposed growth area for up to 2010. And, I at property so that it could, could be serviced by City services Okay, would you like, I've g a couple of (inaudible) descriptions written up (inaudible). UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: I do. (inaudible conversation off microphone) MR. JOYER: I sent an e-mail earlier that Jeff might of copied. (inaudible conversation off microphone) MAYOR BERGESON: Okay. Mr. Hawkins. MR. HAWKINS: My name is Art Hawkins, 6102 Centerville Road. Members of the Council, I'm here to read my remarks because they deal with quite a number of figures and, ahh, and a couple of quotes. But, ahh, I have read the, ahh, latest revisions, as far as I know of the Comp Plan EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 from cover to cover, but my remarks tonight are going to be mainly concerned with the, the tables on Page 3 and on Page 65. I think you'll all agree with this statement that a pending agreement on a gross strategy requires many, often heated debates at City Hall. Finally a compromise agreement has been, was reached and published in The Quad on two dates in 1998, September 9d', or 15th' and September 22nd and I quote from that particular edition of The Quad: "The proposed plan calls for moderate growth of 147 homes per year, average growth (inaudible) 147 per year which slows growth in Lino Lakes by 70% over the growth rate of the past seven years. The population is now approximately 15,000." I'm continuing to quote now. "At full growth, it is expected to be 20,500. The Metropolitan Council made forecast for regional population growth and predicted that Lino Lakes would have 25,000 people by the year 2020. The City decides its own future with it's Comprehensive Plan. The City has its population limit at 20,500 by 2020." That's the end of the quote. So, finally there were definitely goals of 147 new units per year and 20,5,00 as a maximum population to guide development to the year 2020. How well has the City condied WO these goals? We now turn to the Comp Plan update being discussed here tonight for a w OrPage 1 of this plan it says: "The Comprehensive Plan and related support documents esta growth." The, on Page 3 it says: "The following issue su h e for future community s reflective of issues, concerns, and opportunities that have been identified to the 2020 Visionary Stat ent, 1997 Community Survey, and a series of public meetings held at, part of the pl identified..." In this group that I just mentioned community growth, land use, environmental pr services. Note all of these categories and pro'ecti provide and use growth figures and proj the plan if planning is to meet the ap agreed upon growth rate of 147 un 3 of the Plan, the average annu understand it has been that o for population to be at 16,79 in the approach 18,200. cess. The issues which were 1 in the following basic categories: rate of ansportation, and public facilities and are heavily dependent on growth. To as accurately as possible is essential in every facet of Nothing can be done now to alter the fact that the ears not been followed. According to the table on Page old growth was 241.5 for the decade of the 90s and we e years 2000 and 2001. US Census showed the City 000. By the end of this year, our City population will The table headed "Lino Lak'Demographic Goals" on page 65 tells a different story. It shows the population for the year 2000 to be 14,540, not 16,791 the official census figure. Simple arithmetic shows that the difference between the present population and the goal population of 20,500 is about 2,300 new residents. Spread evenly over 20 years, that amounts to 115 people per year and converted to houses at three per house, equals 38 houses per year. So, instead of 147 new homes per year as the Plan calls for, the correct number is 38, casting a very different shadow on the outlook for City management. If we stood by the original agreement, the whole picture changes regarding the need for extending MUSA, building new schools, providing other services, upgrading roads, and so forth and the threat to open space is reduced. At 147 units per year, the population would reach this 20,500 limit by the year 2006. Then what happens for the next 14 years until they the year 2020. Or, or, if the City grows at the rate prescribed, which is 147 units per year, by 2020 the population would reach about • • • EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 • 26,500 or 6,000 over the prescribed limit. If you follow the Plan as it is now written, you simply can't get there from here. • • In summary, the Comp Plan as now worded on Page 65 would commit the City to an average of 147 new households annually through the year 2020. Translating households to people, that rate would add about 440 residents per year. If the final goal is 20,500, we would reach that goal in the year 2006 according to my calculations. And even that assumes that we can drop from our present rate of growth, which is about 800 per year, to 440 in one year. That's why I conclude that our Comp Plan is not ready to go anywhere except back to the drawing board at the present time. To accept the present draft of the Plan would be a sad ending to a process which, at the beginning, held so much promise, involved so many people, and cost so much time and money. Thank you. MAYOR BERGESON: Is there anyone else who did not speak , last week's meeting? Yes. MS. GRUNDHOFER: Good evening. My name is Come ndh`fer, G- r- u- n- d- h- o -f -e -r (235 Linda Avenue). I'm here to speak about keeping some and fauna that we have in Lino Lakes is very special. The People live in the community. So do plants and anima taking places away from them or fragment their place There'll be bird that won't come here anymore . + '11 be ace r the Comp Plan. The flora dartered, threatened species. ey need each other and if we keep on ill die. They will not exist anymore. p ants that will die. People, as we, would not want to go 100 mil to ro ry store. And, it's the same for the animals and the plants. They don't want to go 1Q nt1;=s to and food. And, we have a special place and we have a great opportunity now to keep ' . e ; se that is what the people had wanted. The majority of the people who moved = e ' the t1st place want it that way. They don't want to have a big huge city. They want to be < • toy -Ye their open spaces. They want their water quality to be good. Hundreds of years ago an �`r; • at this time, people, through not having the right knowledge or not planning it correctly, h.° cr=ated deserts. We would not be creating a desert here. But, we're certainly going to be taking of of special plants and animals that we have now and they will not exist anymore. Thank you. MAYOR BERGESON: Anyone else who didn't get a chance to speak at the last hearing? Okay. Now, how many of you spoke last time but would like to speak again? All right. We'll ask that you come up and, ahh, we to have a transcript of your comments from last time so (inaudible) a repeat of what we heard last time. We'll ask you to come up and you'll have the floor (inaudible) hear something else. Let's start on this side on down and we'll just go across. MR. DUNN: Good evening Council, staff, audience. My name is Donald Dunn. I live at 6885 Blackduck Drive. The spelling of the last name is D- u -n -n. If you would, the Quad Press, I'm the man, apparently, that spoke up. I'd rather be thought of as the citizen that came forth and expressed his opinion, than that man, "I am the man." I'm here to do so again tonight. And, I hope I EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 have abided by your wishes, John, because I have consolidated and tried to summarize my personal beliefs and feelings regarding the Comp Plan. If you watch TV, some of the programs started out, especially Geraldo, with a little slogan or saying that king of epitomizes the entire program. It does it's best to summarize up front what they are going to be talking about downstream. I had a difficult time because I came up with two. And, they tied. The first one, I would entitle, "This is a Comp Plan with flexibility for friends." And, the other one, author unknown, it's a Latin translation that followed a movie that I watched a while back, and it was regarding "How things got out of control in a Governor's office." And, by God, as, how hard as the citizens tried, they didn't make any progress. The citizens didn't win and the "good old boy's club" did. And, this translation broke down into who is guarding the guards? Who is guarding the guards? You are the guards. Tonight I'm here because as of the guards. Hopefully temorrow, there'll be a lot of guarding of the guards. As far as I know, what has been made public to me, there wi e r% chi ge in the approach from the letter that you directed to the folks that worked on the Co F� ' era w i1 e back. And, that was the word "encourage" rather than "require." That is still an iss wit te. How you folks will deal with this public hearing, I was unclear after the last meeting e : d. There was discussion, led by the Mayor of how we're going to wrap these things up`Mi what .i e we going to do. The comments ranged to, from a special work session to, suggested by e Mayor, to when are going to vote, when are we going to vote, when are we going to•te. Coun., lmember Dahl, would take credit for that Lacking any knowledge that things ha - e: e request that the record show that the following actions should take place, led by the o cil,' ped and supported by the staff. You've already done one of the requests that I'm askrn ' • nd, that was to have available to the public the transcript of the last public hearing. And, p. cciat- at Linda and I hope you will make that available soon for this meeting. Because, I ink it , ery useful tool that the public should have access to and see what, what's, what the cit eix ;E eling. And, I believe it is absolutely mandatory that this document be in your hands or o any work session to discuss the next steps on the plan. Absolutely mandatory. Here are some of the major things that continue to concern me, for our citizens, from my perspective. The "encourage" versus "require" is, is troubling me. And, the focus is within the Development Plan. I don't have any issues with the inventory and background. It's the Development Plan. That's, that's the heart, heart of the Comp Plan in my opinion. And, the answer that we got as, as, as helpers here a couple weeks ago, and I'll quote from your letter: "spent considerable time figuring out how we can regulate the growth rate to stay within that limit." Ah, I asked you two weeks ago to translate that into a document. I'd like to see that document prior to any work session. I think that it should be prepared and signed by each and every member of the Council as your plan of how you're going to regulate the growth. • • EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 I'm, ahh, also concerned about that aspect in that in reading through the, somewhat sketchy at times, somewhat complete some times, the work session minutes, that there was a question raised several months ago, almost, I think over a year ago, back in April of 2000, of whether the actions that, that were being thought of by the board were legal. I never found out any, any answer to that question that this group posed. Do you have the answer? Ahh, that's a problem. So, that's one issue. It's the, how are you going to regulate the growth rate? Taxes, page 29, it's the only one I put a page number down. It talks about, and again, this is a quote: "Achieving the objective by 2020 of the City tax rate to 20 percent or lower through fiscal and land use planning." I have two thought on that. Twenty years is a long time for the citizens to wait, in my opinion. A long, long time. And, how is that going to happen? How is the Council going to take that commitment and put it into writing so that a task can be structured for staff to "hold their feet to the fire," so to speak, to get it done? I'd like to see that too. The shopping center, and I will not be repetitive because I've spoke o h1y in favor of it. I believe, and I'll just summarize quickly, the advantages that this w offe • the citizens. One, maybe not right at the beginning of a improved tax rate, so we can a`•rd sine of the things we can't now afford without raising taxes. Keep in mind that you've utting, cutting down the rates 20 percent and yet expenditures have to flow upward here's the money going to come from? I am totally in support of that shopping center. hats wh. e land was zoned for. It will do great things for this development, here, in this compl fi• remember, a dollar in the bank is better than zero dollars in the bank. So, we may have t. _ , or our TIF funding to pay itself back. Let's figure out a way to do it. And, I'm asking that the Coma Plan be structured to make sure that that event can take place in a very timely mann •. Una u .tely, the last thing I heard or read in the, in the work session minutes, was that, u • the • eveloper that turned down a, a request for a meeting back on the third of March, t • • :. ch, I beg your pardon if I don't have the date right. But, I think this is an event - • - ple� ould keep us posted somehow. It's a big event. That will, that'll go a long way to so s • e of our tax dollar needs. The next issue is afforda• a housi ,.. did not know another gentleman was going to talk about, but you've heard me speak of � • . The high density allocation land is inadequate. Town Center won't meet those needs. T it's high buck. I've said that before. And, I personally don't understand, or begin to comprehend ho ou folks think that this will meet the goals of the Met Council, which is endorsing this type of housing for our City. And, the "carrot" they're holding out is money, money, to develop this complex. And, that's a pretty big "carrot." Land use. I'm only going to mention two specifics and then I'm going to talk in general because I have, since talking to you the last time, I've reflected and done some additional thinking on the total subject, the 28 or so requests that have come to, to you folks. I don't believe spot zoning is permitted in anyplace in the City. Anyplace, nor permitted by ordinance. The commercial change on J by the J- Mart is a spot zoning change. I don't believe it should be allowed, and or recognized with this Comp Plan. • The other one was one that was certainly sensitive to Caroline. And, that was accelerating property Phase II to Phase I. I have continued concern, as you folks should, and perhaps the lawyer. How can EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 we allow that from an overall view point that there are a lot of people that maybe would like to develop their land that are not in MUSA now. How are you going to turn them down? Is it legal? I don't know. We should have the answer. I don't want to be paying for a lawsuit. I don't want to be paying for a lawsuit. And, that's again where I believe the flexibility for friendship happened. And, I don't, I didn't buy into the explanation that the Council person involved left the room. That don't mean anything. You're friends. Plus, it's very interesting that the other side of the house also is a building contractor. Looks to me like a conflict of interest, ladies and gentlemen. But, the broader issue on all of those, is how did you allow that to happen? The public hearings on land use were closed by Planning & Zoning Board, two years or more years ago. I could find no legal evidence that this was advertised to the City of Lino Lakes residents every which one of them, saying that the door was now open to reconsideration of land use changes. I solicited help from the staff. Couldn't find anything. So, I think you have a list of properties that don't fit the ordinances or fit the equation for being fair to all residents. Because, I can't find any public record announcing that fact. And, from what I know about the ordinances and the City Charter, tha rust be done. So, lets look at that Fairness is the question on that Were you fair to everybody? Ir, a elect few. That's enough(inaudible) tonight. As I said, I was guarding brought back a thought that my granddaughter, Loran, whams it was a pretty astute comment to her grandpa. She said, " and sometimes you gets nothing." Pretty astute. ou're the guards. And, it as about four or five then, but grandpa, you gets what you gets, Council, it does not have to be that way on the mpre nsive Plan. We should get something. The citizens, all of us, should get something. Any I + .'ke sct see you, by taking charge and putting some requirements in there and not encourage the successors downstream know what you meant. Thank you. MAYOR BERGESON: ` :'1 ntinue on here. Mike, you want to go next? We'll let Mr. Stadum catch is breath. MR. TREHUS: 0 Trehus, 675 Shadow Court. In laymen's terms, a Comprehensive Plan talks out of both sides its mouth. If you read the Plan and the wording in the Plan, it says we're going to control, we'r oing to do, you know, a lot of nice things for the environment. But, none of this has any teeth. You look at the map, I don't know if, if the home audience can see this. All these little areas, it doesn't come through very well, but we're more than doubling the MUSA here. We're, we're talking about a 67 percent add on as soon as this Plan is, is approved the way it stands. Sixty -seven percent. Now, we've got a population today, give or take, 18,000 people. And, we're doing that with the MUSA of 3700 acres and we're going to add on a lump two - thirds bigger than that. And, we're going to control growth at the same time? Doesn't that seem a little contradictory to anybody? Maybe, maybe I'm missing something here. This, to me if you're going to control growth, you're going to control the amount of land that's allocated for growth. I, I just don't get that. But then that's not all. Nine years from now, eight and a half years from now, we're going to add another 2000, 2100 acres to that. How are we going to stay within the 148 homes per year rate that we apparently are subscribing to? • • • EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 This is the ascertation of this Council. This is the ascertation of the, of the Comprehensive Plan. How are we going to do it? And, I have a question I hope somebody can answer. Umm, when approved, does this constitute rezoning of these properties? Because, it's dictated here, it's going to be such and such residential or commercial. Is that a rezone? Can anybody answer that question? MAYOR BERGESON: That is not a rezone. When you're done, we'll probably get some general comments (inaudible). Go ahead. MR. TREHUS: Okay, so rezoning would occur later. Is that a development right? You're identifying that these lands in Zone 1 will be developed between now and the year 2010. After which Zone 2 opens up. Looks like a development right to me. To come back to these people and say later on, down the line, Well, you can't build here because, you know, we're past our 147 rate, there are going to be some people that aren't going to be very happy with that. So, how are we going to deal with that? How are we going to manage that? That's a question that should be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. If you're going to open up a huge area like that needs to be some sort of strategy that's legal, that's binding, that you can hang your hat on say. is is how we're going to deal with this. We got a population of 18,000 in our current M A ,70 acres, and it isn't filled up yet. And, we're going to add 124 percent more to that? B , y w e going to stay, the Comprehensive Plan shows, final population, year 2020, 2 . 51 h 's only 2,500 more people than we've got right now. How are we going to do that ove : 19 ars p;: that land mass? I don't get it. And, I wish somebody could expl see some legal precedence where that's happen And, I'm sorry, I don't mean to get irate bu ' ,' tone of voice here. e ho hat's going to happen. And, I'd like to anywhere in this country. Because, I don't see it emo onal issue for me. And, I apologize for my Ahh, I have a document here. Thi rcu d, I, this is what was told to the Comprehensive Plan Task Force too. It is not only i� ' : but during the development of the Plan, the Comprehensive Plan Task Force was told, w t . r population at 20,500. There's a series of ads put out by, ahh, the City in 1998, " h or ' i y? Myth — residential growth will eventually use up all the open space in Lino Lakes." W the map. That's reality. That's all the open space in Lino Lakes, used up, on the map. "Myt r the City has nothing to say about it's future, the Metropolitan Council has already planned the City growth." Reality? That map looks just like the Met Council's map. So, what's the myth and what's the reality? I'd have to say that, ahh, an objective look at the facts here tells you what, which is which. It also states that there's going to be still 60 percent open space. Well, why would we have a map like this if 60 percent open space? I don't understand that. I told you before, I mentioned there was a letter, ahh, sent to the City from the DNR, talks about the need to plan for environmental concerns. And, again, that is not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. And, I think that after approving a huge growth area like we're talking about, it's a little late to try to go back to the drawing board. Come on, let's go to the drawing board now. That's what a plan is suppose to be. A plan. This isn't a plan. This, all this is, is 200 pages, a vision document. And, it says so in the letter read by the Mayor at the last meeting. Do we see this as a vision document? It's a vision document and a map and a very dangerous proposition to be entering into. EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Again, you guys, maybe you're knowing something you're not letting on. But, I really feel that you owe it to the residents and people who are concerned about this to be up front and to have all these details worked out ahead of time rather than taking the plunge and then hoping we can bandage this thing up after the fact. It's a little late to try to do that then. People are, are going to be saying, hey, you're, you're infringing on my rights here. You can't change your ordinances now. It's, it's going to cost me money. Where are we going to be when we do that? We already opened up. We already made commitments. This Plan, if nothing else, is a commitment to that level of development in the City. It is. And all somebody, anybody can come by, any Council can come by and, and ask for more MUSA and this Plan would drive it. This map drives a need for more than 359 acres. Now, 359 acres in itself is an overage because we have over 400 acres of undeveloped commercial/industrial and a land use demand in the Comp Plan of 200 acres. Twenty acres a year times ten years. So, for the year 2010, we need 200 acres. We've got 400 right now, over 400 right now. That's 200 acres out of the 359 that are overage. In addition to that, there's a 19 percent overage. In addition to that we have, what, two years of homes in the at ; s that weren't entered into the calculations? If you add that all up, we had a land use of 56 4 ac` es pe ear, 564 acres for 10 years and, and 550 acres vacant land in the MUSA right now T iey celach other out perfectly. Add to that the fact that we are a past, or virtually past ou MUSA, you can't demonstrate a need for MUSA based, on stated in the Plan. So, if the Plan is going to be mad out of its mouth, either you're going to have to b we no longer commit to 147, and this is what w back it down. One of the things that the Comprehe plan was that the inventory, and the 1999, would yield a Manageme Plan would be amended to in amended to (END OF T • ' E S ready. And, the need for bers and these goals that are it doesn't talk out of both sides of the, snit an say we no longer commit to 20,500, re go to give you. Or, have to take the steps to Force understood during the development of the a, t Inventory Management Plan were being conducted in d that would be appended to the Comp Plan. The Comp cuse, I have to rephrase that line, Comp Plan would be ...to have this Plan adopte y t e end of 1998 and the timing did not allow for the Inventory and Management Plan to be wort d into the Comprehensive Plan at that time. Now, we didn't get a Management Plan. We got a handbook for conservation development. This is a various tool. I've spoken to a number of you on the Council and it's my opinion that you know the tool is there but, umm, certainly we haven't put that tool to use. And, being one of the conditions of approval by the Task Force of that map and this Plan was that there would be further definition of the greenways and so forth with the inventory. That should be done now. The only reason it wasn't done at that time was it couldn't have been done at that time. But, certainly we've had the Plan, we've had the handbook for two years. We paid $60,000 for the inventory and the handbook and we should be putting it to use rather than moving forward this Plan and not really understanding what's going on with the inventory. The greenway system that's depicted here does not coincide with what's in the handbook. So, we're failing, we're failing. 10 • • • • EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 The City of Lake Elmo has a policy to preserve their rural character. They have a policy to do what we say we want to do in our Comprehensive Plan but they actually have one that has validity and they are opting against urban growth and they're going with other types of development. Now, developers are making money, land owners are selling their and for profit, they're protecting the environment, everybody comes out happy. I don't know why we wouldn't want to do that here. And, I certainly don't know why we'd want to move forward with a Plan that doesn't provide for those things when we know, when we have these tools available to us, we have this knowledge available to use, that wasn't available 10 years ago. That we can do these types of things and preserve the very things that we want to preserve. Another concern I have, and this is kind of a side step, but, umm, we do have a notification ordinance. If land use is being changed, and I think it's tied into the word "rezoning" so maybe there's a technicality here but, but notification is suppose to go out to residences within a certain distance of a land use change. And, I guess I question whether not, the City not sending out letters to anybody who's land is near anything that's changed on that map, ahh, whether th s in conflict with the spirit of the ordinance or with the letter of the ordinance. Certainly, I think t's onflict with the spirit of the ordinance which is to send a letter out to make sure eve body, s t se changes are being Tanned because not everybody reads the ry planned ry y Quad. hi fact, I do many people do. If you absolutely have to pass a Plan, you should at lea t take the s out. Because, we have 359 acres of overage in the Comp Plan. But, that's 359 ac + . ared to 2,500 acres here. And, that is a dangerous scenario. We don't have the greenwaysl% ;.o rly . one, we have a lot, it leaves a lot of questions and entanglements. If we need to mo =e forty: • with a Plan, we could take out the map. We could take out all references to the ro , z ` g �s. e could simply send in the document saying that we've got 359 acres, we were reque g ; 9 acres more MUSA bank, we'll put it where we want based on these parameters that are outl t • an And, that would eliminate a huge, huge concern that I think we should all hake. hat -•uld be point number one Point number two would be t •� t . e hod sing goals. We've got a 147 year rate and if you guys truly believe in a 147 rate and ou trul t to live by the 147 rate, then what you do is, you take that total of homes every year, so fo n• ' • o` as such and such, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but you'd add 147 each year u •` o gh the years. And, then you'd look at our current home count. And, when you get to the point w ere the goal, that number, that 147 keeps adding on every year, when you get to that point where that year, in that year where we actually have fewer homes in the City than what the 147 projects out to, that would be the point to add the 359 acres. Don't add, please, don't add 2,500 acres right now. This is untried territory. This is completely risky. It has all kinds of negative potentialities and it certainly does nothing to limit the growth that you say you want to limit. The way it stands? Basically, it's a blank check, business as usual, and let the developers plan the City. It's the way it's been going and that's basically more of the same. We can do better. We have the knowledge. We have the tools and all we need to do is make an effort. Thanks. MR. STADUM: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council. Ahh, my name is Raymond Stadum and I live at 663 Andall Street. Mr. Mayor, you'd be gratified to know I probably don't have that many remarks to make tonight even though I've caught my breath. But, I would like to read a 11 EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 letter from one of my neighbors who's also on the Environmental Board, to enter that into the record, if I may. His name is Rod Kukonen, lives at 647 Andall Street. It's addressed to each of you, to all of you: "A big concern about the proposed Comprehensive ... UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: We did receive that letter. But, certainly, go ahead and read it. MR. STADUM: Yea, okay, thank you. "A big concern about the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan is the extensive MUSA expansion. I recently attended three land use and planning workshops at the University of Minnesota, Earle Brown Center. There was plenty of discussion on comprehensive plans by the faculty. The number one thing a comprehensive plan should accomplish is to represent community values." He has that underscored. "If we could advance 20 years and see what the City would look like under the current proposed plan, I don't think the values of the community at large would be represented. One of our goals of the Environmental Board is to be more proactive rather than reactive. Almost all of our time at meetings is spent reacting to development proposals. We find many times we are engaged in a counter -punch dialo ue with some members of the development community who are unwilling to preserve open s dice or otect environmentally significant areas because they don't have to under these current m era ' ices. I truly appreciate all the time you've spent on this and I know how consuming the pr 'eet :.n be. However, I fear passing the Plan as it is without proper planning tools in place ` Auld ep us in a reactive mode for the next 20 years." And, that was the conclusion of his lett I would like to make, as I said, just a few remarksemy elf. I don't have any prepared notes but I have been reflecting on what was said before and, anwhen - meone said, or suggested to me that, ahh, people who take my position were not reali 're not being realistic about this and growth. And, I indicated to this individual that I'm re tthought most of us were, who were concerned about accelerating even what we mi. +e , . h, outrageous development in, in Lino Lakes. And, I'd like to place, if I couldt' i- larger context because I think some of us are inclined to think what's happening in Li s is ' nd of unique. I mean, that is to say it is a phenomenon unique to us that we have this alii nt of forces. That we have on one side, we have what we think an unresponsive Council aceless bureaucrats residing someplace, ahh, a Cabal of individuals known as the`rop litan Council and we have commercial interests and we have large property holders and develo rs, and, everyone associated with and likely to profit from accelerated growth. And then, on the other side, we have just impassioned citizens like myself. But, it's bigger than that. And, if any of you have read the articles, the syndicated columns, and even a few of the books that have been written on this subject, is a lot bigger than Lino Lakes. Because, what's happening in Lino Lakes is replicated across this country. And, in a larger context, even beyond that. And so while I was sitting at my desk the other day and I was thinking to myself, speculating on what, what my father's generation and the men who fought that war to preserve liberal democracies and representative government would have thought if 50 -odd years ago there'd been met at the boats and said, would you believe that your children, one day, would hand over their rights, their privileges, and their liberties to unelected governing boards? And, would you believe still further that these governing board would extend one day to regional governing authorities? And, no one will have elected those folks either? And that they will, they will make the decisions. The 12 • • • EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 decisions affecting the communities in which your children live and their grandchildren. They will make the decisions ultimately by that notorious big "carrot" or the "stick" that will determine whether or not you live in a green environment. Or, as one woman put it, a desert. The world has turned over many times since that generation fought that big war for democracy and representative government. We've added new and different and strange, even alien meaning to words that you can find in the dictionary. And, those meanings they wouldn't understand. They know the words, but they don't know the meanings any more. Like "diversity." Well, we thought it meant variability. Didn't we? And, it's part of the American character. Isn't it? We're most of us all familiar with Ellis Island. The waves of immigrants who fought their way to some kind of plurality and descent life. But, now what does it mean? Now it seems to mask a hidden social and political agenda. Or, you take the phrase, "the right to affordable housing." All right, that has a noble ring to it. It certainly does. But, it's nothing knew. We all have believed in affordable housing and the right to it provided you could afford it. Yea, the world has turned over many ti and it's happening all over. You have the European Union and it's commission. It's faceless a • al of ndividuals who are involved in the use (inaudible) of sovereign people's rights and s : sibili'ies. You have the World Trade Organization which is stepping on legislation that sov .ei • ati their representatives have passed to protect the environment. And, they're telling the slat -es that they can't do it and get away with it And now in this country, in each and eve c.. u where this issue is faced, people like yourselves, well meaning and intelligent people, g .0 al that, are backing down. I was encouraged by something in this morning paper. And, I'm certainly not going to read it all. But, it's from Mayor Awada, she wrote in t he •a = , Mayor of Eagan: "Housing policy decisions should reflect a consensus of the majority. •resse: through their elected representatives. In fact, the whole point of having different i i 1`s to allow local variation and localized decision making. Through uniqueness, we se of community and provide choices for Minnesotans. We should never dictate to oth ; : ' ey should zone and develop their communities and the Metropolitan Council is atte ' o do. And, finally she says: "As Mayor, I lead and reflect the desires of my residents. take th- a's'on that is formed by consensus and implement it, even when it makes enemies of those W g ire �,. e with that vision." And I, she didn't say it, but I would imagine that would even entail enemnries o had some power and leverage. She would still do the right thing. In closing, I'm reminded of something a man by the name of Andre Mulroe(sp ?), a political activist and journalist said, now deceased. He said, "history is made by those who say `no.' It's not made by people who just bend at the knee." It's made by people who said no. Like those people who said it in Boston Harbor, at Lexington Concord, on the North Bridge. And, it would seem Mayor Pat Awada in Eagan knows how to say no. God bless her. Thank you. MAYOR BERGESON: Thank you. Is there someone else? MS. DONLIN: I was hoping I wouldn't have to follow Ray Stadum because, umm, poor speaker, with laryngitis, following that is just unbearable. But, I'm Amy Donlin. I live at 6100 Centerville Road. 13 EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 And, I don't have a lot to say but I'm going to relate this Plan to an oil painting. And, I do some oil painting myself. And, I was taught early on that many layers make a beautiful painting. And, you start with thin layers and you work up to the painting little by little with little bits of little bits and pretty soon you've got a finished product. And, I was taught also that when your painting starts to get bad, when something is going wrong with it and you can't get back on track, that's the time that you take the canvass and you throw it in the fire or you, you, um (inaudible) Gesso over it and start fresh. And, I think it's at that point, that I would like to see us throw the canvass aside, or parts of it anyway. And, umm, I just see too many discrepancies in the numbers. I think that Mike was right that we are talking out of both sides of it. We're saying we are going to limit our growth, yet we're opening up the doors to just a lot of, a lot of trouble with developers. We've all seen it. People who've been involved with City Hall for a few years have seen the developers, people who land and hope to develop it someday, see this as a blank check and an opportunity to develop and a promise that later on they will be allowed that privilege of, of being rezoned. Because, to me, this says, "we will rezone you, Zones 1 and Zones 2. You will get your promise of medium or low density, sewered residential or industrial or what ever it is." This, to me, is a promise, just from my experiences up here at City Hall for the past 15 years or something. I also want to say that I think the City has a responsibility to held (Z ation and cap it off at "X" number. And, I think we were doing with little bits of lay "s ®ain these years we've been working on these plans and we've been paying lots of mone tog :` good solid product. And, I think that, umm, we had a number. To me it's 20,500 reside b he year 2020. Not to exceed that number and that was the number that I thought we w &'re prom used not to exceed because we, the residents, wanted to maintain a nice rural ambiace her in one way other. And, part of that was to keep the population in check. We didn't want to be Roseville, nor d. space around us. Like what Conni about Lino Lakes are the ecosy like so much about it, hearin gs rabbits even when they're mating cities don't any more. Th they've had all kinds of ad beautiful, wonderful, speci e Woodbury. Umm, we wanted to have some arli as as (inaudible) is that, the things that love so much healthy little communities of plants and animals. That we night, or seeing the stars at night, or, umm, seeing deer or owers. And, just those nice little things that we have that other ,`they've been chased out, they've been smashed on the roads, sities. And, I think we still have an opportunity to maintain those alues here. And, now I'd like to go on to point out a couple of things about the greenways that are shown on the map here. I know that in my little corner of Lino Lakes, down in the southeast corner, there are some problems with the map. We talked on, a little bit about spot zoning. I'm not going to speak about the commercial corner of Centerville Road and County Road J. That's not my turf anymore. But, what I am going to speak about is the spot zoning, Zone 2, that is on the east part of Lake Amelia...I don't know if you want me to point at it or, umm, the sewer would have to get to it somehow and all I'm saying is that it would have to leap -frog right across our property to get to it, nearly a half a mile. And, I'm not ready to bear the burden of some developer's sewage expenses to get a development. So, that is one area that I think is a problem. 14 • • • • • • EXCERPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 25, 2001 Another area is also on our property. It's zoned, umm, on the map here, low density sewered residential. But that property has been committed to the Minnesota Land Trust which is a commitment from us and it will be backed up legally by them that that will never be developed. And, it certainly won't be sewered. So that is shown as sewered. And, also, there are three areas here shown as greenways that are clearly lakes of 200 acres in size or greater. And, I think that that's misleading. That would be Otter Lake, Lake Amelia, and Cedar Lake. They're all designated on the map as greenways and they should be blue, they're water. And, and if we do want linked greenways, if we wanted to have valid good greenways, we'd have to link them. We can't just put pockets of green here and there because they aren't going to go 100 miles to get the groceries. They need to be contiguous. They need to be linked and I think that that was all represented in the, umm, document that our Environmental Board and the citizens on the Environmental Task Force worked real hard to get. A contiguous greenspace plan so that eventually we'd link them with walking paths or not walking paths, maybe just for wildlife passage. But, we did want them to be actually, umm, viable as habitats and they aren't as th-. and. You can't, can't disconnect them like they are So, I'm just asking, there are certai ®`" eas i . he Comp Plan that I would like us to paint over them with white and start fresh. Tha . MAYOR BERGESON: Okay. Anybody else thatAas� ad hance to speak last week or tonight? Anybody else which to speak? Okay. Then, the Chair ' accept a motion to close the public hearing. Council Member O'Donnell moved to close thesublic aring at 7:52 p.m. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanim 15