The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/27/2001 Council Packet• • AGENDA AMENDED CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday August 27, 2001 6:30 P.M. 6:00 P.M. Special Council Work Session to Review the Feasibility Report on Public Improvement for the Lino Lakes Marketplace Call to Order and Roll Call: - Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda — A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) August 27, 2001 (Check No. 62714 through 62832 in the amount of $400,590.55) ii) Centennial Fire District B) Consider Block Party Application for Red Hawk Trail C) Consider Block Party Application for South Glen Circle D) Consideration of Special Event Permit, 3.2 Beer License, Cabaret License for Sandburr Days 2. Open Mike 3. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) Continuation of Public Hearing on Granting a Tax Abatement and Granting a Business Subsidy, Al Rolek i) Consider Resolution No. 01 -106 approving a Tax Abatement to Target and Kohl's (Lino Lakes Marketplace Request for Tax Abatement) 3/5 Vote (Resolution to follow on Friday) ii) Consider Resolution No. 01 -127 approving a Business Subsidy to Target and Kohl's 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch • A) Consideration of Stipulations of Settlements pertaining to Public Trail at the end of Black Duck Drive, Bill Hawkins Page 1 AGENDA • 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) No Report 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) No Report 7. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala • • A) SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 16 -01, Amending the Zoning Ordinance by Rezoning Certain Real Estate from SC, Shopping Center, to PDO, Planned Development Overlay (4/5 Vote Required), Michael Grochala B) Consider Resolution No. 01 -86, Receive Feasibility Report and Set Public Hearing, Lino Lakes Marketplace (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell C) Consider Resolution No.01 -119, Regarding Volker /Crenshaw Minor Subdivision and Variance (3/5 Vote Required) Jeff Smyser D) Consider Resolution No. 01 -120, Preliminary Plat, 12th and Holly (3/5 Vote Required), Cindy Sherman, NAC E) West Shadow Ponds — Jeff Smyser i. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 13 -01, Rezoning to R -1X (4/5 Vote Required) ii. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 12 -01, Allocating 11 Acres of MUSA Reserve (4/5 Vote Required) F) Consider Resolution No. 01 -121, Final Plat, Spirit Hills (3/5 Vote Required), Jeff Smyser G) Classification of Anoka County Tax Forfeiture Property (3/5 Vote Required), Michael Grochala H) Consider Resolution No. 01 -122, Joint Powers Agreement with Shoreview for Water Service (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell (Continued to September 10, 2001 City Council Meeting) I) Consider Resolution No. 01 -123, Ordering Feasibility Study for 62 °d Street Reconstruction (4/5 Vote Required), John Powell J) Consider Resolution No. 01 -124, Ordering Feasibility Study for 12th Avenue/Holly Drive Reconstruction (4/5 Vote Required), John Powell Page 2 AGENDA K) Consider Resolution No. 01 -125, Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract, 2001 Bituminous Wearing Course (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell L) Consider Resolution No. 01 -126, Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract, 2001 Surface Water Management (3/5 Vote Required), John Powell 8. Unfinished Business A) July 23, 2001 City Council Minutes 9. New Business 10. Community Calendar, August 28, 2001 through September 10, 2001: A) Wednesday, August 29, 2001, 6:30 p.m., Environmental Board Meeting B) Monday, September 3, 2001, Labor Day — CITY HALL CLOSED C) Wednesday, September 5, 2001, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session D) Thursday, September 6, 2001, 7:00 a.m., EDAC E) Monday, September 10, 2001, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 11. Adjourn Revised jmp 8/24/01 3:37 PM • Page 3 • EXPENDITURES AUGUST 27, 2001 • • Date: 08/16/2001 Time: 12:12:20 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) • Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (r) 1920 - 1920 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: s Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000051 A T & T 1 71.75 71.75 .00 .00 000073 MCCARTHY, KELLY ANN 1 549.39 549.39 .00 .00 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 202.10 202.10 .00 .00 000442 LYNCH, DENISE 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 1,044.27 1,044.27 .00 .00 000838 BLUCKER, CAROLYN 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 000839 COON RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 375.00 375.00 .00 .00 000840 DEZELAR, RUSS 1 6.00 6.00 .00 .00 000841 FOREST LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 29,900.00 29,900.00 .00 .00 000842 HOLLERBACH, JAMES & JENNIFER 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000843 HAGER, DALE 1 235.39 235.39 .00 .00 0• HALUPTZOK, CEANN 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000845 JENSEN, DIANE 1 153.25 153.25 .00 .00 000846 KARAS, BELL 1 5.00 5.00 .00 .00 000847 MISHLER, ROBIN 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000848 MORAN, VALERIE 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000849 NISSEN, HOLLY 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000850 OPATZ, TERRY 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 000851 OHLROGGE, GARY 1 66.00 66.00 .00 .00 000852 PARSHALL, DANA 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000853 RAYMOND, PAM & RONDO, RAYMOND 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000854 SUMMER, RODNEY & LESLIE 1 166.50 166.50 .00 .00 • Date: 08/16/2001 Time: 12:12:24 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount V - # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000855 SPITZER, DWIGHT 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000856 STANEK, CAROL - 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000857 SANTO, CORI 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 000858 WHITE, BRENDA 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 001506 FIRSTAR BANK USA, N.A. 1 207.28 207.28 .00 .00 001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 64.97 64.97 .00 .00 001932 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1 3,766.69 3,766.69 .00 .00 002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 377.00 377.00 .00 .00 002208 LELS 1 132.00 132.00 .00 .00 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 1 53.80 53.80 .00 .00 002700 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 1 184.37 184.37 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 13,044.10 13,044.10 .00 .00 003451 PERA /REGULAR 1 14,366.03 14,366.03 .00 .00 003457 ARCH WIRELESS 1 22.84 22.84 .00 .00 003915 SCHAPS, LIZ 1 59.00 59.00 .00 .00 004388 TEAMSTER LOCAL 320 1 738.68 738.68 .00 .00 Oil, ARTIG, JAMES 1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00 005037 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF 1 290.00 290.00 .00 .00 900407 COTE, JANE 1 57.50 57.50 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 41 67,913.91 67,913.91 .00 .00* • Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:03:58 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: • Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 1928 - 1928 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000158 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 2 9,144.75 9,144.75 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 2 80.00 80.00 .00 .00 000191 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 20.50 20.50 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY 2 161.46 161.46 .00 .00 000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 55.93 55.93 .00 .00 000370 ANOKA COUNTY 9 1,568.74 1,568.74 .00 .00 000528 QWEST 1 33.28 33.28 .00 .00 000598 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 1,755.27 1,755.27 .00 .00 000705 BRW, INC. 1 2,314.56 2,314.56 .00 .00 000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 2,238.00 2,238.00 .00 .00 41, AALLWAYS ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 99.03 99.03 .00 .00 000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 2 648.12 648.12 .00 .00 000861 BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SERVICE 1 125.00 125.00 .00 .00 000862 MIDWAY FORD 1 319.62 319.62 .00 .00 000863 SALEWSKI, ALISA 1 27.00 27.00 .00 .00 000864 THIESCHAFER, JULIA 1 58.00 58.00 .00 .00 000865 BURGGRAFF, KARY 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000866 WALSH, JANEL 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000867 WHEELER, GAIL 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00 000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 25.04 25.04 .00 .00 000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 12,372.90 12,372.90 .00 .00 • Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:04:07 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 11.51 11.51 .00 .00 000990 NEW HOLLAND PLAN 1 82.65 82.65 .00 .00 001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER, INC 1 100.94 100.94 .00 .00 001247 CROWN TROPHY, INC. 1 251.60 251.60 .00 .00 001255 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 1 101.35 101.35 .00 .00 001262 D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY, INC. 1 49.50 49.50 .00 .00 001267 CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES, INC. 1 17.02 17.02 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 104.85 104.85 .00 .00 001390 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 1 21.75 21.75 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 2 4,914.82 4,914.82 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 197.24 197.24 .00 .00 001584 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 1 2,317.58 2,317.58 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 2 133.25 133.25 .00 .00 001660 GOPHER BEARING COMPANY, INC. 1 18.71 18.71 .00 .00 001680 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 1 585.60 585.60 .00 .00 002120 KELLY AGENCY, INC. 1 58,706.00 58,706.00 .00 .00 0• KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 33.16 33.16 .00 .00 002270 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, INC. 2 459.27 459.27 .00 .00 002320 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST 1 114,761.00 114,761.00 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 16.10 16.10 .00 .00 002380 LINO LAKES BLACKTOP, INC. 1 6,432.00 6,432.00 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 76.14 76.14 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 1,143.60 1,143.60 .00 .00 002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 54,037.83 54,037.83 .00 .00 002580 METROPOLITAN AREA 1 16.00 16.00 .00 .00 002743 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 002820 MN. POLLUTION CTROL AGENCY 1 23.00 23.00 .00 .00 Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:04:17 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Ve # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002910 MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1 108.00 108.00 .00 .00 003091 MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE - 1 264.00 264.00 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 629.10 629.10 .00 .00 003285 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1,875.00 1,875.00 .00 .00 003320 NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 3 2,056.89 2,056.89 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY BOWES 1 232.19 232.19 .00 .00 003871 S. J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 29,322.83 29,322.83 .00 .00 003926 SCHWAAB, INC. 1 34.34 34.34 .00 .00 004070 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE 4 508.56 508.56 .00 .00 004099 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 1 694.48 694.48 .00 .00 004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 244.80 244.80 .00 .00 004233 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS COMPANY 1 447.30 447.30 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 57.51 57.51 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 2,481.20 2,481.20 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 2 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 004530 TURF SUPPLIES, INC. 1 1,826.67 1,826.67 .00 .00 0* U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 1 900.00 900.00 .00 .00 004709 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 1 141.00 141.00 .00 .00 0050021 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC. 1 70.18 70.18 .00 .00' 005029 NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA 1 6,941.81 6,941.81 .00 .00 006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 293.72 293.72 .00 .00 900223 REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. 1 735.00 735.00 .00 .00 900224 NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900345 OPERATING ENGINEERS TRAINING PROGRA 1 1,800.00 1,800.00 .00 .00 900415 CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRUCTION 1 3,641.00 3,641.00 .00 .00 900461 HAMLINE UNIVERSITY 1 65.00 65.00 .00 .00 900524 BURGER, LUANN 1 152.00 152.00 .00 .00 • Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:04:24 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount Ve # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 2 164.39 164.39 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 100 332,676.64 332,676.64 .00 .00* • • Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:12:33 • Ranges: Options: Operator: JAL Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal #: (R) 1923 - 1929 Bank #: (A) Cash #: (A) Payroll Check Dates: (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount 62717 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A 62719 ARTIG, JAMES 62720 BLUCKER, CAROLYN O BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. O BURGGRAFF, KARY 62722 COTE, JANE 62715 M FOREST LAKE SCHOOL DIS 62726 HALUPTZOK, CEANN 62728 HOLLERBACH, JAMES & JE 62729 ICMA /MANAGEMENT ASSOCI 62730 INTL UNION OF OPER ENG 62732 KARAS, BELL O KELLY AGENCY, INC. 0 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES IN 111113 LELS 4 LYNCH, DENISE O METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT O MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE 62738 MISHLER, ROBIN 62739 MORAN, VALERIE 62740 NISSEN, HOLLY O NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS O NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT 62741 OHLROGGE, GARY 62742 OPATZ, TERRY 62743 PARSHALL, DANA 62744 PERA /REGULAR 62746 RAYMOND, PAM & RONDO, O SALEWSKI, ALISA 62747 SANTO, CORI 62748 SCHAPS, LIZ 62749 SPITZER, DWIGHT 62751 STANEK, CAROL 0 STREICHER'S, INC. 62714 M SUMMER, RODNEY & LESLI 62752 TEAMSTER LOCAL 320 • PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC STORAGE /TOW REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMB BLDG ESCROW /725 MA REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMB BLDG ESCROW /612 LO PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY INSURANCE ALLOCATION 01- PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC JULY SAC /SEPTEMBER SEWER PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6590 C TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMS BLDG ESCROW /7845 M REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC STROBE REIMBURSE MINOR SUBDIVIS PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 202.10 * * * * * * ** 55.00 * * * * * * ** 55.00 * * * * * * ** 2,238.00 * * * * * * ** 70.00 * * * * * * ** 57.50 * * * * * * ** 29,900.00 * * * * * * ** 70.00 * * * * * * ** 500.00 * * * * * * ** 3,766.69 * * * * * * ** 377.00 * * * * * * ** 5.00 * * * * * * ** 39,136.00 * * * * * * ** 76,638.00 * * * * * * ** 132.00 ** * * * * ** 25.00 * * * * * * ** 23,908.50 * * * * * * ** 264.00 * * * * * * ** 70.00 * * * * * * ** 70.00 * * * * * * ** 70.00 * * * * * * ** 500.00 * * * * * * ** 1,546.25 * * * * * * ** 66.00 * * * * * * ** 60.00 * * * * * * ** 70.00 * * * * * * ** 14,366.03 * * * * * * ** 500.00 * * * * * * ** 27.00 * * * * * * ** 55.00 * * * * * * ** 59.00 * * * * * * ** 50.00 * * * * * * ** 70.00 * * * * * * ** 57.51 * * * * * * ** 166.50 * * * * * * ** 738.68 Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:12:35 Operator: JAL • Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 0 62753 0 Description Dept Amount THIESCHAFER, JULIA WALSH, JANEL WHEELER, GAIL WHITE, BRENDA WILLIAM G. HAWKINS REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY Total for Dept ** O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY PROGRAM Total for Dept 200 0 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. SOFTBALL TROPHIES Total for Dept 202 O LINO LAKES BLACKTOP, I SPORTS PAD Total for Dept 204 O BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE /PHOTOS O MIDWAY FORD 15 PASSENGER RENTAL O MN HISTORICAL SOCIETY PROGRAM REC O REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. PROGRAM REC Total for Dept 205 O ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN SUPPLIES 0 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. PENS 0 BURGER, LUANN DANCE 0 CROWN TROPHY, INC. SAFETY CAMP O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES O METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, FOOTBALLS /TAPE /DUMMIES •0 NORTHWEST FAMILY YMCA PROGRAM REC O STAR TRIBUNE, INC. ADVERTISING 0 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. PHOTOS Total for Dept 207 0 62723 62724 0 0 0 0 0 62750 • ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. SHIN GUARDS /JERSEYS DEZELAR, RUSS REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC Total for Dept 208 ADULT SP OTHER SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH SP YOUTH SP FIRSTAR BANK USA, N.A. WORLD NET SERVICE /VCR MAYOR /CO KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY MAYOR /CO LEAGUE OF MN CITIES IN INSURANCE ALLOCATION 01- MAYOR /CO TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC AUGUST 8 MAYOR /CO Total for Dept 401 KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY ADMINIST METROPOLITAN AREA LUNCHEON /LINDA W S ADMINIST ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY 0 TRAINING /L W SMITH ADMINIST Total for Dept 402 O ECM PUBLISHERS, INC ADVERTISING ELECTION O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY ELECTION 58.00 70.00 70.00 55.00 64.20 196,258.96* 776.00 776.00* 388.19 388.19* 6,432.00 6,432.00* 6.38 319.62 108.00 735.00 1,169.00* 80.00 259.93 152.00 251.60 30.31 1,143.60 6,941.81 244.80 141.00 9,245.05* 9,144.75 6.00 9,150.75* 202.33 74.00 2,596.00 225.00 3,097.33* 126.00 16.00 290.00 432.00* 21.75 6.00 Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:12:36 Operator: JAL • Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Total for Dept 403 O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY CABLE Total for Dept 404 0 KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY SENIORS Total for Dept 406 0 KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY FINANCE O STRATEGIC INSIGHTS COM LICENSE /UPGRADE FINANCE Total for Dept 407 O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY Total for Dept 414 LEGAL CO O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY ECONOMIC Total for Dept 415 O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY PLANNING O NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING O SRF CONSULTING GROUP, TRANSPORTATION PLAN PLANNING O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC AUGUST 8 PLANNING Total for Dept 416 0 KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY Communit Total for Dept 418 62716 �0 0 0 62721 0 0 62725 0 0 0 0 62735 62736 62754 62718 0 0 • A T & T AALLWAYS ASSOCIATES, I ANOKA COUNTY BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE L CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE COON RAPIDS POLICE DEP CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN HAGER, DALE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY KELLY AGENCY, INC. LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, LEAGUE OF MN CITIES IN MCCARTHY, KELLY ANN MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. XCEL ENERGY ARCH WIRELESS KELLY AGENCY, INC. SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE USE TAX POLICE SERVICE AGREEMENT POLICE REGISTRATION /RENEE K POLICE CAR WASHES POLICE TRAINING POLICE UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE REIMBURSE TUITION POLICE REGISTRATION /DAVE P POLICE WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY POLICE REPAIR FRONT COVER POLICE INSURANCE ALLOCATION 01- POLICE REIMBURSE TUITION MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 MONTHLY SERVICE WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Total for Dept 422 POLICE POLICE POLICE BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING Amount 27.75* 5.00 5.00* 47.00 47.00* 81.00 447.30 528.30* 10,296.20 10,296.20* 22.00 22.00* 146.00 510.64 694.48 175.00 1,526.12* 227.00 227.00* 71.75 99.03 1,568.74 50.00 100.94 375.00 101.35 52.81 235.39 65.00 5,550.00 107.78 4,778.00 549.39 53.80 3.14 13,762.12* 22.84 256.00 2,461.20 2,760.04* Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:12:37 Operator: JAL • Check # Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN ADVERTISING O D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPL GATORADE O EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT STREET SIGNS 0 KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY 0 OPERATING ENGINEERS TR CLASSES /3 62754 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 430 0 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU PARTS /SUPPLIES O BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SER ALIGN O CUSHMAN MOTOR VEHICLES POINT KIT /CONDENSER O FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. PARTS /SUPPLIES O GOPHER BEARING COMPANY BUSHING 0 KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY O LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, REPAIR #541 O LEAGUE OF MN CITIES IN INSURANCE ALLOCATION 01- 0 LEEF BROTHER, INC. SHOP TOWELS O MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, IN BEARING TAKE UP O NEW HOLLAND PLAN GASKET /BELT Total for Dept 431 0 0 0 62724 0 0 0 030 7 0 62745 0 62754 62727 0 0 62737 0 0 0 62745 0 0 62754 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC FIRSTAR BANK USA, N.A. GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN KELLY AGENCY, INC. LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MENARDS, INC. MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PITNEY BOWES QWEST SCHWAAB, INC. XCEL ENERGY HOFFMAN, MICHAEL KELLY AGENCY, INC. MENARDS, INC. MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS MAT -LEASE OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES WORLD NET SERVICE /VCR MONTHLY SERVICE WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY IN INSURANCE ALLOCATION BULB PA MONTHLY SERVICE POSTAGE METER RENTAL MONTHLY SERVICE NOTARY STAMP MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 432 STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 01- GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY TUBING PA MONTHLY SERVICE NATURE CALLS, INC. PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTAL OPERATING ENGINEERS TR CLASSES /3 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, WILDFLOWERS /GRASSES QWEST TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS TURF SUPPLIES, INC. XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES /MARSHAN PARK MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 450 PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS O BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE /PHOTOS RECREATI 251.02 49.50 104.85 5,998.00 600.00 322.31 7,325.68* 161.46 125.00 17.02 197.24 18.71 905.00 351.49 5,584.00 16.10 20.50 82.65 7,479.17* 55.93 11.51 164.39 4.95 80.44 828.00 22,353.00 21.82 105.42 232.19 830.49 34.34 9,267.13 33,989.61* 64.97 1,848.00 54.32 24.04 629.10 600.00 35.09 161.65 102.80 1,826.67 29.27 5,375.91* 18.66 Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:12:39 Operator: JAL • Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY RECREATI 442.00 O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES RECREATI 2.85 O TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATI 190.92 Total for Dept 451 654.43* O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 30 PARK BOA 100.00 Total for Dept 452 100.00* O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY ENVIRONM 58.00 0 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, WILDFLOWERS /GRASSES ENVIRONM 35.09 Total for Dept 461 93.09* O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY SOLID WA 2.00 Total for Dept 462 2.00* O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY FORESTRY 201.00 Total for Dept 463 201.00* 0 CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRU INSTALL ROCK WATER 3,641.00 O GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 292.80 O HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN VALVE WATER 4,914.82 O INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, WATER SAMPLES WATER 70.00 62731 JENSEN, DIANE REIMBURSE PHONE REPAIRS WATER 153.25 O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY WATER 554.00 O LEAGUE OF MN CITIES IN INSURANCE ALLOCATION 01- WATER 1,763.00 62737 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 54.91 0 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIP WATER METER PARTS WATER 1,755.27 O OPERATING ENGINEERS TR CLASSES /3 WATER 600.00 111110 QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 33.28 5 QWEST MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 52.13 O U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, WATER METER PARTS WATER 900.00 62754 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 2,110.39 Total for Dept 494 16,894.85* O BRW, INC. INFLOW /INFILTRATION STUD SEWER 2,314.56 O GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 292.80 O KELLY AGENCY, INC. WORKERS COMP /DISHONESTY SEWER 1,418.00 O LEAGUE OF MN CITIES IN INSURANCE ALLOCATION 01- SEWER 1,049.00 O METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT JULY SAC /SEPTEMBER SEWER SEWER 30,129.33 O MN. POLLUTION CTROL AG LICENSE RENEWAL /TOM DW SEWER 23.00 62754 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER 1,311.86 Total for Dept 495 36,538.55* O CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN ADVERTISING OTHER 257.54 O FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JU LAND PURCHASE OTHER 2,317.58 O S. J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTI CONTRACTOR /MAIN STREET T OTHER 29,322.83 O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY OTHER 2,012.50 Total for Dept 499 33,910.45* O EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, REPORTING • TIF ADMI 1,875.00 Date: 08/21/2001 Time: 13:12:41 Operator: JAL • Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount • • Total for Dept 500 1,875.00* Grand Total 400,590.55* • Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 - Office (651) 784 -2427 - Fax August 21, 2001 TO: City Council City of Centerville City Council City of Circle Pines City Council • City of Lino Lakes FROM: Milo Bennett SUBJECT: Ratification of expenditures and approval for payment of expenses. Your approval of expenses, as listed on the attached copy of the check register, checks #12803 — 12826, in the amount of $9,917.75 is hereby requested. • • • • DATE CHECK# NAME 08/21/2001 12803 08/21/2001 12804 08/21/2001 12805 08/21/2001 12806 08/21/2001 12807 08/21/2001 12808 08/21/2001 12809 08/21/2001 12810 08/21/2001 12811 08/21/2001 12812 08/21/2001 12813 08/21/2001 12814 08/21/2001 12815 08/21/2001 12816 08/21/2001 12817 08/21/2001 12818 08/21/2001 12819 08/21/2001 12820 08/21/2001 12821 08/21/2001 12822 08/21/2001 12823 08/21/2001 12824 08/21/2001 12825 08/21/2001 12826 Centennial Fire District Check Register VOID Amoco Oil Company Anoka - Technical College Arthur Mohler City Wide Garage Door Company Connexus Energy David Bruder Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Loffler Business Systems Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, & Radosevich McLeod USA Nat'l Imprint/Franklin Products Oxygen Service Company, Inc. Pioneer Products Public Safety Center, Inc. Qwest Reliant Energy Minnegasco Richard Thompson Steven J. Johnson & Associates, LTD. Tom Thumb Xcel Energy Arthur Mohler Janet Haapoja Mark's Meat Products Page 1 of 1 ACCOUNT AMOUNT 00000 - VOID 0.00 42100 - Fuel and Lube 391.91 42220 - Travel, School, Conference 900.00 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 90.52 42110 - Other Maintenance 337.87 42252 - Station 1 - Electric 377.48 42280 - Miscellaneous Expense 58.43 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 592.59 42110 - Other Maintenance 17.56 42160 - Accounting Services 2,580.00 42240 - Telephone Expense 359.06 42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies 487.38 42270 - Breathing Air 113.50 42130 - Equipment Expense 1,964.22 42130 - Equipment Expense 309.00 42240 - Telephone Expense 297.85 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 54.74 42220 - Travel, School, Conference 48.00 42160 - Accounting Services 63.00 42100 - Fuel and Lube 26.01 42254 - Station 2 - Electric 668.03 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 38.34 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 22.26 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 120.00 Total $9,917.75 • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: AGENDA ITEM 1B Jean Viger August 27, 2001 Consideration of an Application for a Block Party, Red Hawk Trail Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: Attached to this agenda item is a request to hold a block party in the Cul -de -sac, Red Hawk Trail, on September 7, 2001 starting at 5:00 p.m. and ending at 10:00 p.m. Also attached is a map showing the location of the proposed party and the signed petition from property owners acknowledging they have been notified of the party. The application was faxed to me for verification of homeowners, therefore the names are a little difficult to read. These property owners are indicated by the slant marks on the map. The Police Department and the Streets Division of the Public Services Department have been notified of the party. Public Services Streets Division will provide barricades. OPTIONS: 1. Approve application for the block party. 2. Return to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION: Option No.1 • AUG -21 -01 TUE 11 33 AM WG• -16- 00i 12: al FAX NO, 6126713426 P. 02 CITY OF LINO LAKES 651 S32 2499 P.01/04 DATE 6 /z20,/of BLACK. J' i Y M J LJCtuTQN CITY OF LINO LAKES The foliowing application is herewith submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as a request to hold a block party on the public night- of-way. nAmr OF APPLICA1'1I' : =�^ 9,'L 'z - (\' t ADDRESS 1 L. "1 ‘, L Q1(U4_, & \ L iHOKE TELEPHONE NO : 1.., ; 1 - L `.rr7)(;-. WORK TELEPHONE NO. : 61a. - 6 � "' i� X ) LOCATION OF DLOC . PARTY (Street name Ir location, intersection to intersection) U'O iktl,l.,yY(.. -MAIL- C. - \ Q. " sCc\.(_ PURPOSE OF PARTY : _ k?-{‘) DATE Ann HOURS OF PARTYt of to exceed 10:00 P.M.) IT 1.S HEREBY AOItE,IEDt The applicants agree to abide by all rules set forth below, together r Frith all ordinances and regulations which may be imposed governing such activities. 1. petition. All residents living on the street or block in which the activity is planned, must sign on the last page of this application indicating they consent or do not object to t:hs biock party. 2. Pn1-ric04_es.. Applicants shall be responsible for placement, maintenance and removal of barricades to be provided by the city in proper locations, such barricades to be left by the City on one corner of the biock. Barricades, nhall be placed Kt either end of the street in which the block party is to take place. PACE -1- • • • BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION (Continued) 3. Traffic. The total roadway portion of the right -of -way shall not be blocked; at least a 10 foot aisle shall be kept open at all time to permit passage of vehicles of residents of the block and emergency or other authorized or necessary vehicles to enter or exit. 4. Surface of Street. No materials of any type (such as powder, sawdust, etc.) shall be placed on the public right -of -way which will create a hazard. 5. Supervision. Applicants shall maintain adult supervision at all times during the activity. 6. Clean -up. Applicants shall provide trash receptacles to prevent as much littering as possible. Applicants shall be responsible for the pick -up or disposal of trash and garbage following the event. Such clean -up shall be completed within 24 hours after termination of the activity, but in no event later than midnight the following day of the block party. 7. Speakers. No loud speaker system shall produce sounds audible outside the areas designated for the block party. PAGE -2- AUG-21-01 TUE 11:33 AM nUG-16-21,7101 12:32 CITY OF LINO LAKES 14 V1i.A.C> VQ.L.I/Ver?4,4.1"f„ LC, FAX NO 6126713426 P. 03 651 982 2499 P.03/04 PETITION (Resideptk coneentini ADDRESS / 1 (,X., ;/` 6,13 5 at Hi., c TELE. O. )?- - t lz .7% — aLLi610 t. Cc- \ V • 0,vp_c ,iL\ .t 17 tit .1 me.Qck / /24 T11\ S.,E) % • . ; .2. t d )"■,.. t sr ) e*, 411 Ze . , - • , kA:?. l'41/;' (tir 'dfititiz),,,nr- tt 7 \rc:z v. 4*/'' t4 lie/Z 41r e ,' .71101, ,t A:4'7 l''/A/414,(4,1,7i• 3// "7 7I.C' .4' -3 •••••••■• •■•••••11...111. Name of Organization (If 'applicable) • Checked by: Police Department Public, Works Department 0 Cn W NW. Cor. ot the NW1 /4 ot the NW-i /4 ot aec. 04, 1. 71, 173.21 7 DRAINAGE 1 1-61.87-\ \-- 206.97 EASEMENT \\ r 167.29 NI I �s „II IM 1) \ :I 170.34 m 10 r) 0 0 O 2 S 8928'03 "E 1313.88 /i 85.35 7 85.35 -7 1 / / DRAINAGE / / EASEMENT 7;i/ ��, // / / 0 I //o j / ,4,// //% a/ 6 7 //m ' n ° N w /; O L :8`Z J 'r scj / /0 cD ` \0 0) / \ � \\ •�O O1 N ZI I�1 O \ / I •o22�k /19.55 1° .01.% - o -r-s� EA 0 co O O 10 1n O 0 O 0 O 233.00. WEST 0 cn Line of Ware Road 3 w 0 v_+ EXCEPTION 00 °294 �9- R =�O o I CS) LL' 'o N Z0)- SEE DETAIL A t I (LOWER RIGHT) / EAST 233.00 w ji ;$`o C$= Z E6 n ES ►- n p'9 N o • O r, • W g _ < � In .E1 z g JZ C �� 0 / vi15 1J1 0 S 89'28'03 "E\ 33.00 233.00 r--- _ - 200.00 £tf) --r N 89'28'03 "W 0 C4 OD EXCEPTION 0 T-V) S 89'28'03 "E Z ,,��,,�� 200.00 7.00j`�r 0 163.00 I a 7 z co N ~86'4356 �� I� L S 89'40_48 "E J 1 to 4 co / // /o. 60 0 m IcL 1 135.00 oryy o l0 2A", I NIco \S 89'4Q'48 "E J K 135.06 -1 IG oI I� gI L S 89.40_48_E J f - 135.07, %1 � 1811,Y1'"1 4 1/ • /o 60 J Q 60 0 60 L S 89'40.48:11- J O 0 .1 gI LAS. 89'40' 48 "E -u 1.35.07 r 10 \� ao 0'' �a7 / 1- 29.19 al- -' v� co O 0 I;' Z./ L5.56 1..55.27 c0 O EAST .', R_25 F45.5 • 60 .0 co r0; 1 101 .,. ti).--3q ': :\ L_ -sI15: "� _tw 1 1 �N 89'05:36'E IL: Ct E. -- 163.02 - -- � 45.53,.. 4j 1e 1I `.1 \ / / 540 °o id 1. /,�� i �✓� g.1 12 DRAINAGE EASEMENT S 89_15' or- 142.8 rn- Io 2 LS 89,_27'3 3 S 35. 0 / z`°I / - AGENDA ITEM 1C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jean Viger DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Consideration of Application for Block Party, South Glen Circle VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: Attached to this agenda item is a request to hold a block party in the Cul -de -sac, South Glen Circle, on September 14, 2001 starting at 5:00 p.m. and ending at 8:00 p.m. Also attached is a map showing the location of the proposed party and the signed petition from property owners acknowledging they have been notified of the party. These property owners are indicated by the slant marks on the map. As stated on the petition, two homes are new and at the time of this application were not occupied. Ms. Lisa Handrich was unable to get signatures from the other two homeowners because they were out of town. However, the block party has been held in the circle for the past two years with signatures from both addresses and she sees no reason either homeowner would object, in fact quite the contrary. The Police Department and the Streets Division of the Public Services Department have received information regarding the block party and have informed me they do not have any safety concerns about either party. Public Services Streets Division will provide barricades and a police officer may stop by to introduce himself/herself and answer any questions that residents may have. OPTIONS: 1. Approve application for the block party. 2. Return to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION: Option No.1 • • • ,0 DATE BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION CITY OF LINO LAKES The following application is herewith submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, as a request to hold a block party on the public right -of -way. NAME OF APPLICANT : �� ?/- / % "'``v/'A ADDRESS : 6$rY C'inve . , /e/i #97 L HOME TELEPHONE NO. : , 57-7-17 7/2:-5-45 WORK TELEPHONE NO. : f AJ /zip ,s LOCATION OF BLOCK PARTY (Street name & location, intersection to intersection) PURPOSE OF PARTY : z%,44 yAte, -� DATE AND HOURS OF PARTY: • 5 Art (Not to exceed 10:00 P.M.) IT IS HEREBY AGREED: The applicants agree to abide by all rules set forth below, together with all ordinances and regulations which may be imposed governing such activities. 1. Petition. All residents living on the street or block in which the activity is planned, must sign on the last page of this application indicating they consent or do not object to the block party. 2. Barricades. Applicants shall be responsible for placement, maintenance and removal of barricades to be provided by the City in proper locations, such barricades to be left by the City on one corner of the block. Barricades shall be placed at either end of the street in which the block party is to take place. PAGE -1- 1 • • BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION (Continued) 3. Traffic. The total roadway portion of the right -of -way shall not be blocked; at least a 10 foot aisle shall be kept open at all time to permit passage of vehicles of residents of the block and emergency or other authorized or necessary vehicles to enter or exit. 4. Surface of Street. No materials of any type (such as powder, sawdust, etc.) shall be placed on the public right -of -way which will create a hazard. 5. Supervision. Applicants shall maintain adult supervision at all times during the activity. 6. Clean -up. Applicants shall provide trash receptacles to prevent as much littering as possible. Applicants shall be responsible for the pick -up or disposal of trash and garbage following the event. Such clean -up shall be completed within 24 hours after termination of the activity, but in no event later than midnight the following day of the block party. 7. Speakers. No loud speaker system shall produce sounds audible outside the areas designated for the block party. PAGE -2- • NAME /941.7,14,1k/ i PETITION (Residents Consenting) ADDRESS TELE. NO. b;-2- eit nreh 24A 0-016--b 765-5L/27 Name of Organization (If applicable) Checked by: Police Department Public Works Department • L _ J rn Ia 7- -3 „OZ, 10.00N - 1' co co c\I .._ c., co ,c; c, .6 fri o • 3„91 , 11,20N I-- - 91'09'1 00'09 VAVd 91'09'1 - I 3 „91,1 *.ZON N 03 o 0 L _ 00'09'1 _ -3 „0Z, 1 0.00N - -1 0 c0 I -- oo'091 _ -� t �r — 3„02, 10.00N 0) 0 rn L— _ 00'osl 0 0 W 0 o 3,,0 1 0.00N 7 0 o 0) O 0 0 0) /\ L CO 0 0 CO o 0 0 o) 00.051 — J , r 3 „0Z,10.00N- 0 0 00'oSl — , Ckc - 3 „OZ.10.00N -(:) I\ I= 1I 1 II/ // (1 to n "'s 0 \ � � p tO % 11 / 0 i• s 0 L N ■ f c0 1 1? 22.18 -1 / I — — ZZ1'91— m ▪ N 589.5560. • • �” r' o) L 00'Sll —/ O ' • r3 , 10,00N-1,- °j' 11 r` w to may^ f'op tri III • r o co i\ rlh 1 64- 4.6 o 3„ Z� O.00N • 51 8.2 1 25 E `� / 0 3 „0Z, 0.00N • 'o / n,0 96, • ��6 N l r9'� ��' _ _ • _ 59' \ 1Z.611 �3„S*.9fZON —� G2) -JV `V 2 A.11., ” A C / �h�) y 1 - E 10'Sl l 00 Tr / / 9/040 U0 /0 S89'58'40 "E 0) 03 ' 1 i./ /// L_AO sl co h 3 „OZ,10.00N W I 0 0 o) co 09 - - S9'1Zl- ua64 6f.00N J gt L �\ h3 /e'� Q yti cb. •, r) 5/ h^ / 54. C"--/ / \\ „i N N' ■ 3L 1,94 .ZON i3 „9',1L s 0.0 0N • o -9�� m/ss r in N � a s N p a-----9.97o/ !O! N NO -sZe NI 11 ^ O(t) ^ a o I 4 ;� �I j I N ^ oc re_j i In cft o0os,1 4.1 oz J o� \11 (0 4( `” / °FN' �< <X.p 66'6Z -3 -e V4,4 o T 3 „9'f',10.00N aO ,0,I,/ S � o S• 000 ca £Z , �� 13 „9'f . l 0.00NJ, 1 j' a 0 1/ 4 S89'58'25'E \ 0. \ W N co co^ co o) I— &'f 06 hN I I II I Q M h IV NI co I '° co N L i97. 1 N 41. 0 0 72vaulaS03 c°o h 170'012 1 Zf 'Z6 �6>s •6 / 35 4"//v- 0 00'06 00'06 — 66.6L —y I�' r� 1o) Lc) 03 zr- N �^ ho ^ It h 4 NI 00'Sl1 3.5C.10.00NI 11 Nk 10'S11 co to 00'f • — — 1£"099 M,.6Z, l £'.00N — — L7 - -- • • • AGENDA ITEM NO. 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Consideration of Special Event Permit, 3.2 Beer License, Cabaret License for Sandburr Days Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Sandburr Days is an annual event held by the Circle -Lex Lions Club at Sunrise Park. This year's Sandburr Days will be held on September 7 -9. This annual event requires a special event permit, 3.2 beer license, and a cabaret license, The Special Event Permit has been submitted and approved by the affected departments. The application for a 3.2 beer license is complete and is accompanied by a certificate of insurance for liquor liability naming the City as additional insured. The cabaret license application is also complete. This license is required to regulate entertainment where on -sale beer is served. All necessary fees have also been paid. The Circle -Lex Lions Club are required to have a food license from Anoka County. They are in the process of obtaining this license and it is necessary that it be posted in the area where food is sold. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt a motion approving the Special Events Application, 3.2 Beer License, and Cabaret License. 2. Deny request. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. 8/22/01 RD /Correspondence /City Council /Green Sheet/Sandburr Days • • AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Al Rolek DATE: 8/27/01 TOPIC: Public Hearing on Granting a Tax Abatement and Granting a Business Subsidy Vote Required: 3/5 BACKGROUND: A public hearing was opened on July 23 and has been continued regarding the request for tax abatement for the Marketplace project on 35W /Lake Drive. According to the Minnesota Business Subsidy law, a public hearing must also be held before granting a subsidy that exceeds $100,000. This public hearing is to take public comment on these issues. The Marketplace, which includes a Target Superstore, a Kohl's Department Store and additional smaller retail and restaurant space, is estimated to be a $24 million project that will generate a substantial commercial tax base and provide needed services for Lino Lakes residents. The project developers have requested financial assistance to the Target and Kohl's portion of the project. The proposal before the city council is as follows: 1. A $491,000 net present value tax abatement to Target and Kohl's. Tax abatement provides a pay -as- you -go subsidy by reimbursing to the project the city portion of the additional taxes generated by the new development. This financial assistance will be paid, with 7% interest, until the amount is paid in full, or for a maximum of six years, whichever comes first. 2. The project's $105,000 surface water management fee will be waived. 3. Fifty percent (50 %), for an amount of $74,312, of the SAC/WAC area charge will be waived. 4. The city will have the ability to recover the waived fees with tax abatement dollars. The city has established criteria to evaluate the granting of a business subsidy. In addition to increasing the tax base, a project receiving a subsidy should promote one or more of the following: • 1. Compliance with Comprehensive or Other Plans. 2. Development of Marginal Property. • so • 3. Upgraded Design and /or Other Amenities. 4. Utilization of Existing Infrastructure Investment. 5. Direct Monetary Return on Public Investment 6. Leveraged Funds. 7. Spin Off Development. 8. Growth Potential 9. Community Services 10. Non - competition with existing services OPTIONS: 1. Open the public hearing 2. Continue the public hearing RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • AGENDA ITEM 3A -1 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Al Rolek DATE: 8/27/01 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 01 -106 approving Property Tax Abatement for the Target/Kohl's project VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: This resolution recognizes that the Marketplace development meets the goals and objectives outlined by the city in its business subsidy criteria. It is recommended that approval of the abatement be contingent upon final approval of the project by the City Council. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -106 2. Do not approve the Tax Abatement 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • e Councilmember and moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 01 -106 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR THE TARGET /KOHL'S PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: 1. (a) Target Corporation and Kohl's Department Store, Inc. (the "Companies ") have requested the City to abate a portion of the City's share of all property taxes to be generated for six (6) years (specifically, with respect to the payable 2004- 2010 property taxes) at the northeast corner of I -35W and County Road 23 (Lake Drive) (the "Property ") for the 182,760 SF Target Superstore and the 106,584 SF Kohl's Department Store (the "Project ") to be constructed and located therein. Springsted, Inc. has requested on behalf of the City that Independent School District 831 (the "School District ") and Anoka County (the "County ") grant an abatement for the Property. The School District at a meeting of its Board on June 18, 2001 has declined to grant an abatement for the Property. Anoka County at its Intergovernmental Committee of July 11, 2001 declined to grant an abatement for the Property. The abatement (the "Abatement ") is currently estimated to be $103,860 per year for a total of not to exceed $491,000. (b) Target Corporation and Kohl's Department Store, Inc. (the "Companies ") have requested the City to waive Surface Water Management Fees of $105,000 and 50% of SAC/WAC area charges of $74,312. The City may elect to recover these fees through tax abatement of the City's share of all property taxes to be generated for two (2) years (specifically, with respect to the payable 2011 -2012 property taxes) at the northeast corner of I -35W and County Road 23 (Lake Drive) (the "Property ") for the 182,760 SF Target Superstore and the 106,584 SF Kohl's Department Store (the "Project ") to be constructed and located therein. 2. On the date hereof, the Council held a public hearing on the question of Abatement, and said hearing was preceded by at least 10 days but not more than 30 days prior to published notice hereof. 3. The Abatement is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1812 through 469.1815 (the "Abatement Statutes "). 4. The Council hereby makes the following findings: • • • a) The Council expects the benefits to the City of the Abatement to at least equal the costs thereof. b) Granting the Abatement is in the public interest because it will enhance and diversify the tax base of the City, encourage additional "spin -off' development, and increase the number and diversity of jobs in the City. c) The Council expects the public benefits described in (b) above to be derived from the Abatement. d) The Property is not located in a tax increment financing district. e) In any year, the total amount of property taxes abated by the City by this and other resolutions does not exceed the greater of five percent (5 %) of the current levy or $100,000. 5. The Abatement is hereby approved. The terms of the Abatement are as follows: a) The Abatement to Developers shall be in the amount of $491,000 Net Present Value. b) The Abatement to Developers shall include interest at seven percent (7 %) over the length of the Abatement. c) The Abatement, including the interest, shall be divided so that (1) Target Corporation receives the incremental taxes generated and paid on its parcel plus 61.84 percent of the Abatement for the remaining parcels, except the Kohl's parcel, and (2) Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. receives the incremental taxes generated and paid on its parcel plus 38.16 percent of the Abatement for the remaining parcels, except the Target parcel. d) The Abatement to Developers shall be for a maximum of six (6) years and shall apply to the taxes payable in the years 2004 through 2010, inclusive. e) The Abatement to City for recovery of waived fees shall be for a maximum of two (2) years and shall apply to taxes payable in the years 2011 and 2012. f) The Abatement shall include only taxes on the incremental value of the Property and the Project. g) The Abatement shall not include an area -wide Fiscal Disparities contribution. h) The Abatement may not be modified or changed during the term set forth in (a) and (b) above, except with the prior written consent of the Companies and the City. i) The Abatement shall be subject to all the terms and limitation of the Statutes. • D • In order to be entitled to the Abatement, the Company shall not be in default within the City of any of its payment obligations respecting any taxes, assessments, utility charges or other governmental impositions. 6. The business subsidy to the Developers as described above is hereby approved. 7. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute Abatement Agreements and other appropriate documents to facilitate the finalization of Abatement to the Developers. 8. Staff and consultants are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary or convenient to effect the intent of this resolution. Dated: , 2001. ATTEST: Mayor City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • AGENDA ITEM 3A -2 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Al Rolek DATE: 8/27/01 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 01 -127 approving a Business Subsidy for the Target/Kohl's project VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: This resolution recognizes that the Marketplace development meets the goals and objectives outlined by the city in its business subsidy criteria. It is recommended that approval of the business subsidy be contingent upon final approval of the project by the City Council. • OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -127 2. Do not approve the Business Subsidy 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • Member adoption: • introduced the following resolution and moved its LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 01 -127 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVING BUSINESS SUBSIDY TO TARGET CORPORATION AND KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. BE IT RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes City Council as follows: Section 1. Recitals 1.01 On July 23, 2001, following a public hearing, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes (the "City) approved a Business Subsidy Criteria (the "Criteria "), pursuant to Minnesota Statute, sections 116J.993 through 116J.995 (the "Business Subsidy Act. ") 1.02. Target Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, and Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the "Developers ") have requested a business subsidy (the "Subsidy ") through tax abatement in the amount of $491,000 plus interest and a waiver of $105,000 in Surface Water Management Fees and a waiver of 50 percent of SAC/WAC area charges in the amount of $74,312 for the construction of a Target Superstore and Kohl's Department Store in the Marketplace Development. The Subsidy shall be divided so that (1) Target Corporation receives the incremental taxes generated and paid on its parcel plus 61.84 percent of the Abatement for the remaining parcels, except the Kohl's parcel, and (2) Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. receives the incremental taxes generated and paid on its parcel plus 38.16 percent of the Abatement for the remaining parcels, except the Target parcel. 1.03. Pursuant to Section 116J.994, subd. 5 of the Business Subsidy Act, the City has on this date held a public hearing on the proposed subsidy to the Developers, following published notice as required by law, at which hearing all persons wishing to express an opinion were given an opportunity to do so. 1.04 Pursuant to Section 116j.994, subd. 4 of the Business Subsidy Act, the Developers have agreed to goals for the number of jobs created, and wage goals for the jobs created. Target Corporation has agreed to number of new jobs created at a wage of $ /hour, plus benefits. Kohls Department Stores, Inc. has agreed to 30 Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) at a wage of $8/hour, plus benefits. Section 2. Findings. 2.01. It is hereby found and determined that the business subsidy is in the best interest of • the City because it is consistent with and promotes the goals established by the City in adopting the Criteria. • • • 2.02. It is hereby found and determined that granting the business subsidy to the Developers furthers the City's general plan of economic development of the community by encouraging growth and development of the Lino Lakes Town Center. 2.03. Pursuant to the Criteria established by the City, it is hereby found and determined that the business subsidy promotes the following: 1. Compliance with Comprehensive or Other Plans. 2. Upgraded Design and/or Other Amenities. 3. Utilization of Existing Infrastructure Investment. 4. Spin Off Development. 5. Growth Potential 6. Community Services Section 3. Authorization. 3.01. The business subsidy to the Developers as described above is hereby approved. 3.02. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Development Agreement, including the business subsidy agreement required by the Business Subsidy Act, and other appropriate documents to facilitate the finalization of the business subsidy to the Developer. 3.03. Staff and consultants are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary or convenient to effect the intent of this resolution. Dated: , 2001. Mayor ATTEST: City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUESTED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 7A Michael Grochala August 21, 2001 Lino Lakes Market Place SECOND READING: Ordinance 16 -01 Rezoning To PDO 4/5 Vote on Rezoning Ordinance The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 16 -01 on August 13, 2001. The developer has revised the development plans to incorporate changes required as part of the preliminary plat/development plan approval. The revised plans have been included in Ordinance 16 -01. Additionally, the site plan was revised to replace the two proposed fast food restaurants with one larger restaurant pad. As stated in the ordinance, the convenience store, restaurant and bank sites will be subject to the site plan approval process requiring additional staff review, Planning & Zoning Board review and City Council approval. The ordinance text was modified to reflect the site plan changes and lot reconfiguration. Other specific changes include: Section 2.D(1) was amended as follows: 1. Refrigeration units on delivery vehicles shall not operate between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. limited to the same hours. Operation of delivery vehicles shall be limited to the same hours. Section 2.D(6) was added as follows: 6. Commencement of development on the subject property (Exhibit A), in conformance with the plans attached hereto, shall be subject to the execution of a Development Agreement by and between the City of Lino Lakes and the owner and subdivider of said property. OPTIONS 1. Approve rezoning to PDO. 2. Deny PDO rezoning. 3. Return to staff and continue to next meeting. • • RECOMMENDATION Option 1. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. 16 -01. • 16 -01 Council Member • introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 16 -01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM SC, SHOPPING CENTER TO PDO, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: SECTION I. FINDINGS The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. 1E of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan, as the site is guided for commercial uses. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for commercial uses. Land in the area of the site is already developed with commercial uses or designated for such use. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Utilities are currently available to the site. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property in conjunction with the public improvements proposed. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by rezoning from SC, Shopping Center to PDO, Planned Development Overlay pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate: Exhibit A SECTION 2. DISTRICT PROVISIONS S A. Development of the subject property shall be in substantial conformance with the preliminary development plans shown on the following exhibits: Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Ordinance 16 -01 Page 2 Preliminary Plat prepared by Westwood Development Services dated August 8, 2001. Site Plan prepared by Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., dated August 20, 2001. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan prepared by Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., dated August 20, 2001. Landscaping Plan, prepared by Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., dated August 20, 2001. B Design Guidelines. Buildings that substantially comply with the following guidelines shall be deemed to meet the architectural intent of Lino Lakes Marketplace PDO. 1. Composition and Massing. Building massing should be used to highlight the location of the building entry. Corners should be accentuated with massing or material accents. Building facades should be composed of three recognizable elements of a base, a middle and a top. Therefore, all single tenant buildings and multiple tenant buildings will be required to use common facade elements such as: Defined base with accent materials Signband field of stucco or similar color material Cornice line of stucco over entry areas. The design will be consistent on all buildings. Cornice line of stucco or field color. This cornice line can be particular to the building. Colonial style gable roof forms and standing seam metal similar to what is shown on the submitted building elevations for Super Target and Buildings A, B, C, D and E should be designed in proportion and scale to the individual building. This form may not be applicable on all building types and retail franchise image. 2. Materials. Common materials used throughout the development will provide visual continuity that will enhance individual buildings as well as reinforce the Town Center District. All buildings will be required to use the following materials or other materials substantially similar in color and texture. Material Manufacturer Brick Field Color Brick Accent CMU Base CMU Accent EIFS Field/Signband Beldon Brick Beldon Brick Anchor Block Anchor Block Dryvit Color Jewel Blend A 97 -02 Potomac Clear 99 -36 Mojave Saddle Sandlewood Beige Finish Velour Texture Dart-Tex Rock Face Burnished Quartzputz • Ordinance 16 -01 Page 3 EIFS Cornice Dryvit Buckskin Sand Texture Metal Standing Seam PAC Clad Hartford Green N/A Metal Cap Flashing To Match EIFS Cornice Color The franchise retail image of each tenant should be coordinated with these materials wherever possible. 3. Accent Lighting When accent lighting is proposed on the building, it will be required to use the item listed below. Material Wall mounted accent lights Manufacturer Model Color/Finish Phoenix Intrigue Series -Metro TBD 4. Multiple Tenant Buildings: Building A, Building B, Building C, Building D and Building E as located on Exhibit C shall be designed in accordance with the following: Exhibit F Multi -tenant Building Elevation, prepared by RSP Architects, Ltd., dated May 9, 2001. 5. Single Tenant Buildings: The Gas /Convenience Store, Restaurant and Bank as • located on Exhibit C shall be designed in accordance with the following: Single use tenants shall substantially comply with the development standards outlined above while still maintaining their retail dress image. It is strongly encouraged that each building incorporate the gable end roof form and standing seam metal over the entry or on the corners to reflect the vernacular established by other buildings on the site. 5. SuperTarget as located in Exhibit C shall be designed in accordance with the following: Exhibit G SuperTarget Building Elevation prepared by Target Stores, dated March 27, 2001. 6. Kohl's as located on Exhibit C shall be designed in accordance with the following: Exhibit H Kohl's Building Elevation prepared by KKE Architects, Inc., dated June 28, 2001. C. Signs 4, Signs on the subject property shall conform to the Planned Development Overlay Site Plan and the requirements setforth herein. • • • Ordinance 16 -01 Page 4 1. Wall Signs. a. SuperTarget signs shall conform to the following: All letters and logos will be individual aluminum cans, internally illuminated. Proposed Sign 30" Pharmacy 12' Bullseye 60" TARGET 72" Super 8" underscore 48" Expect More Pay Less 35" Archer Farms 26" Market 24" Tenant sign TBD Specifications Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype green face, trim and return. Prototype green face, trim and return. Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype green face, trim and return. Prototype Red face, trim and return. TBD Location Square feet front elevation 56 sf South (front) 489 sf West elevation South (front) 365sf West elevation Combined West entry on front elevation East entry on front elevation South (front) b. Kohl's signs shall conform to the following: Proposed Sign 60" Tenant Sign Specifications Individual letters, internally illuminated Location South elev. Between main entries, North elev. NE corner 167 sf 143 sf Combined 100 sf maximum per tenant Square feet 100 sf each c. Multiple Tenant Buildings: Wall signs for Building A, Building B, Building C, Building D and Building E shall be in accordance with the following: i. Building fronts shall have a maximum average sign height of 30 inches and a maximum width equal to 80% of the lease width. Capital letters shall not exceed 36 inches. Ordinance 16 -01 Page 5 ii. Building rears shall have a maximum average sign height of 24 inches and a maximum width equal to 60% of the lease width. Capital letters shall not exceed 30 inches. iii. In no case shall the total sign area, per business, exceed 100 square feet for building fronts and 75 square feet for building rears. d. Single Tenant Buildings: Wall Signage for the Gas /Convenience Store, Restaurant, and Bank shall be designed in accordance with the sign requirements of the SC — Shopping Center District as specified in Ordinance No. 12 -97. 2. Freestanding Signs a. Pylon sign A (Combination Sign) shall be in conformance with the dimensional standards depicted in Exhibit I and be subject to the following sign details Proposed Sign 6' -9 "x 7' -4" Super TARGET and Logo 3' x 6' -9" KOHL'S Specifications White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. Square feet 49.5 sf per side. 20.25 sf each tenant, each side. b. Pylon sign B (Super Target Sign) shall be in conformance with the dimensional standards depicted in Exhibit J and be subject to the following sign details. Proposed Sign 17' -3 "x14' -0" "Super TARGET and Logo Specifications White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. Square feet 242 sf per side. c. Pylon sign C (Kohl's) shall be in conformance with the dimensional and architectural standards depicted in Exhibit J and subject to the following sign details. Proposed Sign 28' -0" x 6' -0" KOHL'S Specifications White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. Square feet 168 sf per side. d. Monument Signs shall be in conformance with the dimensional and architectural standards depicted in Exhibit I and be subject to the following sign details. Proposed Sign 5' -0" x 7' -0" Tenant sign D. Special Provisions Specifications White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO fluro. Ordinance 16 -01 Page 6 Square feet 35 sf per side. 1. Refrigeration units on delivery vehicles shall not operate between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Operation of delivery vehicles shall be limited to the same hours. 2. Site Plan Review. Development of single tenant buildings, identified on Exhibit C as Convenience Store, Restaurant, and Bank shall be subject to Site Plan Review approval in accordance with Section 2, Subd. 5 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. 3. Development of Outlot D and Outlot E as depicted in the Site Plan (Exhibit C) shall be contingent on the . developer acquiring title to the adjacent parcel and follow the platting requirements of the Lino Lakes Subdivison Ordinance. Development of said lots as specified herein and in conformance with the Site Plan (Exhibit C) shall not require amendment to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO). 4. Minor variations from the approved plans may be approved by the City's Development Review Committee, under the direction of the Community Development Director. Substantial departures from the approved plans will require an amendment to the Planned Development Overlay (PDO). 5. Unless otherwise specified herein the development shall be subject to the provisions of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable chapters of City Code. 6. Commencement of development on the subject property (Exhibit A), in conformance with the plans attached hereto, shall be subject to the execution of a Development Agreement by and between the City of Lino Lakes and the owner and subdivider of said property. SECTION 3. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Ordinance 16 -01 Page 7 SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. • • • • • EXHIBIT A PROPERTY description is as follows: Ordinance 16 -01 Page 8 That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and Lot 15, Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, and the Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8; thence Northeasterly along said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 444.0 feet to the point of beginning of this description; thence East and parallel with said South line of Section 8 for 413.00 feet; thence Southwesterly and parallel with said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 209.00 feet; thence East and parallel with said South line of said Section for 812.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the Northwesterly right of way line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 35W; thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly right of way line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 35W to its intersection with the East line of said Section 8; thence North along said East line of Section 8 to the Northeast corner of South Half of Southeast Quarter of said Section 8; thence West along the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter of Section 8 to its intersection with the Easterly right of way line of said Old Minnesota Highway No. 8; thence Southwesterly along said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING 3 PARCELS: EXCEPTION NO. 1 That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and that part of Lot 15 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota described jointly as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8; thence West along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 1172.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing West, along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 208.7 feet; thence South, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 233.00 feet; thence East deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 208.7 feet; thence North, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 233.00 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION NO. 2 That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, distant 1587.48 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence South at right angles, a distance of 201.00 feet; thence West, parallel with the North line of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter and to the Easterly right of way line of Old State Trunk Highway No. 8; thence Northeasterly on said Easterly right of way line to its intersection with the Ordinance 16 -01 Page 9 • North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence East on said North line to the point of beginning. • • EXCEPTION NO. 3 That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West (assumed bearing), along the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, a distance of 1380.70 feet, to the actual point of beginning of tract to be described; thence at right angle to the North line, South 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds West, 233.00 feet; thence at a right angle, North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West, 500.57 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 17; thence Northeasterly, along said Easterly line of a curve whose radius is 5641.85 feet, a central angle of 00 degrees 21 minutes 52 seconds, a distance of 35.88 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the South line of the North 201.00 feet of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East, parallel with North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, to a point of intersection, said point of intersection distance 1587.48 feet West of the Northeast corner of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, and 201.00 feet Southerly at a right angle to said North line; thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds East, on said right angle line, 201.00 feet, to the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East, 206.78 feet; to the actual point of beginning. 02000 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Eth\ }*E • 1!) -2241M IWE OF NE NORM 20100 FEET or n( HORN Line ar mr Sys or me 5EI /4 rj 178 ,367 OUTLOT E a8' 121 1' 153 r 20472 ) 81 18 gl .t C7 AM7 `11�w T 709 CA n l 5T- r l o l "Tr rIQ Qi ; _,_ U I Wararr. P[ ;a or 1ar W AY PER BOON 27 OEM PAGE 491 11721- -'a 1-11 VA > ,,D 77TH STREET 426 n -r L.vl 480 41 ti NOTE: SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS FOR EASEMENT DETAIL LOT 5 148 179 4/ LOT6 ' 179 LOT7 179 ff OlPOSED APOLLO DRIVE 41100 '- -5QIIn me or 1101 PM m1, . -sounS ear nr Nlz or h.F / SD/ Cr SEC 4 T. CI+ R. Sa - 1 _ •17b7T L VICINITY MAP NO SCALE At 51c 56. 0 0 A RIGHT OF ACCESS TO ANOKA COUNTY uvE PATAcill WIN NE 20u 808 h G z LOT18 ya r: AJ 394 (,r LEGEND CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE WETLAND SIGN - TRAFFIC /OTHER MAIL BOX CABLE TV BOX GUY MORE POWER POLE SANITARY MANHOLE SOIL BORING BITUMINOUS SURFACE FLARED END SECTION STORM MANHOLE TELEPHONE BOX HYDRANT GAS LINE POWER OIERHEAO POWER UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND WA7ERMAIN FENCE LINE ELJ 77FI"7 S7F?EE 870 \ • a4 LINE orb sec e or me 5E1/0 LOT 9 NEroe 2k arc 7112o me Se1/4 Cr SEC d -ter OUTLOT B WC' 7 I. A Y0 :6174 if. ' CO AREA SUMMARY BLOCK LOT 1 48,441 5.F. - 1.112 AC LOT 2 30814 5.F. = 0.707 AC LOT 3 30220 5.F. - 0.694 AC LOT 4 46,787 5.F. - 1.074 AC. LOT 5 - 28,491 S.F. = 0.654 AC LOT 6 - 26,JJ9 5.F. = 0.605 2C LOT 7 30,688 5.F. - 0.705 AC LOT 8 440.087 SF = 70.703 AC LOT 9 690,408 SF. - 15.850 AG OUTLOT A 160,351 SF. = .1681 AC. OUROT 8 64,963 SF. - 1.491 AC. OUROT C 20,737 SF. - 0.476 AC. OUROT D 24,098 S.F. - 0553 AC. OUTLOT E 21.338 S.F. - 0.490 AC ROW 77TH _ 6..907 SF. 1.467 AC ROW APOLLO = 21.603 S.F. - 0.496 AC. SITE = 1.749.271 SF. - 40.158 AC. 3514 �No • N / Bs '1'6 N�8) ESN CURRENT ZONING / Zoning: Setbacks Shopping Center District Budding: Front 50 feet 5/de 70 feet Rear 30 feet Street 50 feet Parking Side 5 feet Rear 5 feet Street 15 feet / OWNER GLENN R. & MYRNA L. REHBEIN CLYDE L. & ARLENE M. REHBEIN MICHAEL D. & CHERYL P. WINCE (C /0 GLENN REHBE IN COMPANIES) 8657 Naples St. N.E. Blaine, MN 55449 -6724 763 - 784 -0657 DEVELOPER RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 700 lntemotionol Centre 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 612 -336 -7200 PLANNER - ENGINEER: PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP, INC. 111 Third 4venue South Suite 350 Minneapolis. MN 55401 612 - 370 -2610 SURVEYOR: WE57WO00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. 3701 12th Street North Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 320 - 253 -9495 I ". Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th St. Narthe Ste. 206 53. Cloud. MN 56303 Phone: 320- 253 -9495 Far: 320 - 253 -8737 1 baby arty ea 66 r Dar y yap* 67 r r a md 7 am* =C =al=ert.. al NY 1 as • ,Wp 74* Ire Ww Ar an of Au N..r or Ms Res No E^Mme 44601 SHOW NEW LOT LAYOUT 4.741 SNOW NSW 1AT tA501r 76-- 1- 5NOWFRPwt LAYOUT 60141 STOW NSW LOT LAYOUT to ADD SA9IDIE0T DUAL 7 .W1H SHOW NSW 710E LAYOUT Corm AP Gb BAG Dane BWX Record Thsrlu by /de1c Prepared for. Ryan Companies US, Inc. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3387 EX /S77NC LEGAL DESCRIPTION Mot port of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North Range 22 We t 1 Auditor's Subdivision Na 134 An 1 C5 and Lo 5, e o Count M 9 Y• Minnesota, 1 North, Ran eallows Commencing at the infesota. n of the South line of Section 8, of Old Township M 31 North, Range 22 West, thence County. theast Mmnesofa, and the Easterly right of way of l pd Minnesota Highway 71 N8. 8' 444.0 feet to the p long said slog Easterly 0! right es way Ina oI Od Minnesota d No. 8 for 4S4 0 feet fo the Pont of 7 473.0 feet Ohs description; Southwesterly East and parallel (0,0 with said South lore of Section 8 /e 413.00 inne [hence for 0 and thence East sod rollel Easterly with of way line of Old Minnesota for No 8 for a or le feet: its intersection East and with the wdh said South line of said I/O, 0/ 44 /or 810 loot. less. to its .351.7 nn wdh re Northwesterly right of way e o/ Minnesota Intestate Interstate h * Nonce Northeasterly to its intersection Bono said Northwesterly afin right of way line / Minnesota o 16 o/o aid y No 35W ec its the North the 0155 line /sax[ Section Q thence North long said East line f Section 8 to the Northeast comer of said S uth al Southeast Ovorfer of said Section 7 $ thence West ion along the North line of sord South Half s o/ Southeast Quarter of Section 8 e e intersection with the id Easterly East right t wow /ere a said Min Minnesota Highway 80. B; thence Southwesterly along said Easterly right of way line of pd Minnesota Highway No. 8 to the point of beginning EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING 3 PARCELS: EXCEPTION NO. 7 That port of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section d Township 31 North, Runge 22 West, and that part of Lot 15 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota described jointly as follows: Commencing of the Northeast comer of the South Hall of the Southeast O,ater of Section 8; thence West along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, o disfonce of 1172.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing West, along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 208.7 feet; thence South, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, o distance of 233.00 feet; thence East deflecting to the left 90 degrees, distance of 208.7 feet; thence North, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, o distance of 233.00 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION NO. 2 That port of the 5suth Half of the Southeast Quarter. of Section 8. Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County Minnes010, described as follows' Beginning of a pant on the North line of said South Hal/ of Southeast Quarter, distant 1587.48 feet West of the Northeast comer thereof, thence South of right angles, a distance of 201.00 feet; thence West, parallel with the North line of said South Netf of the Soulheost Quarter and to the Easterly right of way foe of Old State Trunk Highway No. 8: thence Northeasterly on said Easterly right of way line to /ts intersection with the North line of said South Hal! of Southeast Quarter; thence East on said North line to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION NO. 3 Mot part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section B. Township 31 Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. described as follows: Commenting at the Northeast Comer of said South Half of Southeast Quarter thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West (assumed bearing), along the North line of so/2 South Half of Southeast Quarter, a distance of 1380.70 feet, to the actual point of beginning of tract to be descnbed, thence at right angle to the North line, South 00 degrees 18 minutes J7 seconds West. 233.00 feet: thence ot o right angle, North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West, 500.57 feet, more or less. to the Easterly line of Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No 17,. thence Northeasterly, along said Easterly line of o curve whose radius is 5641.85 feet, a central angle of 00 degrees 21 minutes 52 seconds, a distance of 35.88 feet more or less, to Its intersection with the South line of the North 201.00 feet of said South Half of southeast Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 2J seconds East, pondlel with North line of said South Ho/f of Southeast Quorter to o point of intersection, said point of intersection distance 1587.48 feet West of the Northeast corner of said South Hal/ of Southeast Quarter, and 201.00 feet Southerly of o right angle to said North foe: thence North 00 degrees 78 minutes 37 seconds East on said right ongle line, 201.00 feet, to the North line of said South Ho/f of Southeast Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East 206.78 feet; to the actual point of beginning. RECE V 22 Ian Mwo AUG 0 8 2001 CITY OF LINO LAK _S GRAPHIC SCALE a m Lao ( IN FEET ) 1 bah = 100 ft Lino Lakes Town Center Lino Lakes, Minnesota Date 1 -11 -01 sheet 1 or 2 20005851 5851PPF1.0WG PRELIMINARY PLAT Exhibit / / / / / / / / / / / r� I I - - - -7E J 235.0' Y� >% % T _ _ - -, -. -• _ J .- .._. . -_ _ _ -PROCf CF PARKING - a+0' 11 R90.0' _W- 705HI GF WAY i:F fiEFD Qr RA04( �' WAY U I 'ER 8041 22 OEE05. RAGE 491.,, S TREE T) Cad 48 '00429 before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 454 -0002 )4N. Toll Free 1 -800- 252 -1166 77TH j STREET) 270' 060.0 11 CONCRETE LOADING AREA //l • ;T 7 �I I I I I I I I 091.0' 236.0' • F7 / 8 L1 ESQ KOHL•S 2F -SFR 86.584 SF DOCK POND DRAINAGE AND UTIUTY EASEMENT OAR ALL CF 2Un0T A 70.0' 31.0' 291.0' 31 611300.--- 320' 65' ORNAMENT AL U072NC _ F10136E WP.) " GRATE (035,) R4 30.0' 09' ' 1 E9' 30 0l. TAIL C 6,000 S0. FT 65.0 2■ '1 630.0' .) 5.0r 'S 720 // RETAIL D 6.000 SO. F7 R1P2 j R25. . * R500' • M eRe 8 CROSSWALK (TIN) t - _ •• WY..,l!T 52.0' • 3.0 IRNMRNCOS PANCMENF ti1Y")� _ "m1.cc-3e PYLON'A01:47. . MI SITE DATA • SNIPER TARGET • KOHL'S (W/ PROOF) • RE'AI. A • RETAIL 8 • RETAIL C • RETAIL D • RETAIR E • RANK • RESTAURANT • CONVENIENCE STORE' TOTAL 4t30.0'9 ROADWAY APO 00(564AR CONSTRUCTION BY 0TY OF L'NO LAKES U60+4.G SO I. 182.060 106.584 6,200 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 4.500 4.500 3.600 330.944 FLOOR AREA* SOFT. 164.484 05,926 5.400 5,400 5.400 5.400 5.400 4.050 3,000 870 294.140 ♦ MS SM. ROURO3 PARKYN 20) Wu 04/1om1•e01Fle ,.us uraaw •exzeic um. Om pro - Heal ARIA j Exhibit ULDTED ACCESS TO 77)H STREET (DLUIGRHIT v&ONcLESTRst/C110,4011N) ,:rt•A \ / . - — — r-1.44- \c-a• —I ROO< CONSTRIXRd ' ‘--i '''' • $ TR E V \ :Or= • .. -=::1- I --= .7.-1r14.!-4-Itf'5.-T.:7'. f - --- -----cr... Ise-.==. ..-•--°°-=-21°—'-. ...r• " lk .. • 9 a 9 itO el.! ..— "...... 1, =,. 1!--z.,/ / - (7— rx. 4' r P61.7 (le WA? elw 0415 06 s")W., r WAY PCP 6526 IF 01700 PAC( 401-,,, ?•■ 1\-.\ HI nx4 37 • 90.1 • Coll 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, Twin Cities Area 454-0002 AIN, Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 77TH • TREET) , •=4 ----FJ —',.— t—i' — —1 ....--' . "..t. r \ '2 ,p'l \I ! ,,- / „e fk) \ / .• I I ,, 1 I • ; 0 •I ; a a 6 7'2 a 2 re I ei E 5 Z•; 1495 C • M 17:1 Z • 0 Ilk 111;:!,• CC lile t' g..1 2 KIHLS 2F- SFR 8.584 SE 910.70 egula ...,.;;;;,••••-• -T ....-"' ..- ,.....;,.....:, ..--,,...., ........,,,...,:,..ri,„----,..,.....,00%••• %--- -1%-7" (") EXBLANCTIORciypFIBIR , ../......"...::: ...._;,..„,.: ,,.,„-. ,...------- tisl ' .,--:„.k.:>_... - --- --.0:-...*:-.•:-='` ow". .;:::',..t.-5.--j....%.;...,.:•,"...%...-- ,-,T.'013 .-"•••.4..?i,j;;T• .- '...-• - s-.• • _12:695E0 -MIN LEGEND ..------ E5151103 --- RoC.: coNsTRucnoN ENTRANCE • \•••• crtv PROJECT (RV OTHERS) nil STORM SEWER DATA • REFERENCE SHEET 6/16 =CR CUPRFNT STORM SEWER DATA • PARKING AND BUB DING PACS 10 BE LOWERED 0.5' FOR FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS END--00 crrr,PROJE NMI GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES • CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING .16111415 AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES. SUCH AS ExiSTING GUTTER CRADES AT THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS, PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRACING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF AN CRSCREPANCES OR vAMATTONS FROM PLANS. • CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR unury 10056)065 - 454-0002 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION \CONSTRUCTION • REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND I AYOUT R59 _ ••'' .„.„, .3.--......,--;.....„;., .....›,' ..,<.,<:---'-':/. ....„....r. ......>....,_. .-"<",::-/--•-> .. s','--::%'-' • • , r`• - , • , 0 • THE SITE GRADiNG OPERATIONS, WHEN COMPLETED SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS 8FIN0 GRADED TO "PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION". THIS 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL BE DETERMINED BY CHECKINC SLAB THICKNESS THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. THE "PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION" IN 0 THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY 0 CHECKING THE PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS. AND REFERRING TO PAVING 'LAN FOR LOCATION AND LIMITS OF VARIOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS. • INSTALL SILT SACKS IN ALL CATCH BASINS LOCATED WITHIN DISTURBED AREAS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. • ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADINC OPERATIONS AND BE MAINTAINED 61NT)1 ALL AREAS ALTERED ON THE SITE HAVE BEEN RESTORED. • ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL 86 SURFACED WITH CRUSHED ROCK ACROSS FULL WIDTH FROM ENTRANCE POINT TO 50 FEET INTO CONSTRUCTION ZONE. REFER TO DETAIL. • CONTRACTOR SHALL. STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE-SPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE MINIMUM A' DEPTH (COMPACTED) TO ALL AREAS DISTURBED. TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. • CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS 114 CUTTER SHALL BE SUmPED 0.15 FEET RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. • ALL ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED WITH MECHANICAL. • ALL SILT FENCE TO BE ORANGE IN COLOR. • HEAVY DUTY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 OR STEEPER AND NEAR AREAS WHERE MATERIAL IS TO BE STOCK PILED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. o .0 (7)- \ DETAIL SHEET 18/18 „ OF Li 11-it3--2 1 2001 =t) IVO - 46, Es RIGHT-OP-WAY UNE PROPERTY LINE CURD IMF CATCH 8496/510114 0566,44A51IOLL RATER 11.1 —C) yu#101X /SANITARY 56,1E4 TOPOGRAMICAL CONT01,9 LINE PClE • WICRANT GATE 6414E SOL DONNG SILT FENCE -MY DALE PROPOSED SPOT 1<1604110,15 PROPOSED IJRAINACE ELM, ARRONS LANDSCAPE YARD DRAIN ROCK CONsTRucTIoN ENTRANCE 4' DROP CURS S(CDON SCNE NORTH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SEE NOTES FOR MACH µ0 /MSG AROUND 9GN'S 1' ROROER IX' ANNUALS F(AJIT ARCM) 9441 r u • Lw15 CF iRRXATYJN RIOT CF WAY PER 0EE0 OF AGO 1 WAY PER BOCK 27 OF 0095. PACE 487 Oil [T1 / 1111116211,*)a11:111ZI.:16Z11:11*:411tit: liC d EII Si til% , 17 nn -o+"o— :1 uuts ° Amn, -i f► SCifTfiEi( UTETT-SATr -J 50448811#K 35159BFD AREA5 W/ CRY M %(TYP.) Tor:RIAR6S elut0.1rit. R —A Ni 41i* • 4W 1^riP a 0 0 0 8l n 0 a a as 0^ a= re • Z▪ : 1-'5 z'- a -,- 1"�Ra Vn !L.°. 4_5 • ; es i� 500 3' RACK OF CURB. SEED REVAWNG 25NR8ED AREAS 9/ CRY STANDARD NAME 19.1)4 AS5 M% ®WerTARGET 182,760 s.f. KOHL'S 2F - SFR 86,684 55 . ..•,1. P(ANRNC.. (87 OMT/E77) 411114. 4it.! ifit :Ass• T r d eli l�■we■■ t t .,. EE3. ■ ■1M■ & R o��ii�1� ■� "�::.t t r: Ear ` 0 ' 8' MDL ■ B AMEN 39E5( ®eiil fit `1 1E1 -- = �__ , 1 Elv, > EO LEI _ - D rnY ■�• �- sr --1rDR . . ( �RE1AK SI%�) r ski, 0 1 ! tt yya�. -P-3 �'� iLl` `•s7D f'uiEl 1 _- i� Q _ ff� • ifiii: ..... _. ...."i'�' ,$.,.1 .scoot is-YE$ 5'ARCM SQJ Ea Y411 41 110 vs 4 1444/ AO .. 712_,OF 700ND 5_ (RI •__. 0 4 • ,0 111,„! %t go- N PLANT SCHEDULE ISECID UOUS TREES / SHRUBS 08 i 0 LOCATED ON TCP CF BERAL. FM1 NANIENANCE OF POND III= LANDSCAPE NOTES • REFER TO UMIT5 OF IRRIGATION FOR. SOD AND SEED AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SHOP DRAWING OF IRRIGATION PLAN TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL. • ALL TREES REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION SWILL BE CHIPPED AND STOCKPILED ON SITE FOR USE WHERE SPECIFIED. REMAINING WOOD CHIPS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFT SITE. • ALL DISTURBED LAWN AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS OTHERWIS5 NOTED. • ALL INTERIOR PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE PLANTED WITH CRY STANDARD NATIVE WILDGRASS MIXTURE AND COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • REFER TO SITE INFILTRATION PLAN FOR DEPRESSED ISLAND TREATMENT • ALL (01090 ASPENS AND 001109WOOD5 TO BE CLEARED AND GRUBBED. • ALL OVER510RY AND UNDERSTORY TREES PLANTED IN S00 AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED W/ A 4' DA. MULCH CIRCLE TO A DEPTH OF 4' MINIMUM. • ALL SHRUG (3E0S TO BE MULCHED AND EDGED WITH POLY EDGER UNLESS LOCATED ADJACENT TO A CURB OR SIDEWALK CODE QTY COMMON NAME LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS Al 5 ALLEGHENY 5ERACEBEHRV I.5 B &13 CLUMP FORM AB 49 AUELA.RCNIER LAA1S CA�. 3 AMERICAN PLUM AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 2 3&6 STRAIGHT LEADLIT B&B PRUNUS 439591CAU AGAR :195EWNK1 X AU1LM4 BLAZE GAL 1( B&8 AND FULL C(3OV0I _31,. 31 RIVER B:RCH CLUMP FORM . FULL FORM 6' 8374.LA IRCRA HT 1.5 T3&H CC 23 (HORNLESS COCKS(•'SIR HAWTHORN STRAIGHT LEADER 2 CAL. 2' CRATAE030 C93S -GILL. VIA. DIEPJAS CAL. 6 AND FUL_ CROWN CO 15 COMMON HACK8ERRY 2' B&B 5TRA:GH1 (FACER CUERCUS PAL351015 CAL. . 2_ GELDS OCCIXEN'ALUS CAL. MR AND Fu.... (,0701164 CR _ _ CS 9 _ 69 GRAY DOGWOOD (TREE I-C111 1.5 B &8 ' S'RAIGH' : EAGER CORMS RACE/OSA CAL. AND 5U..1. CROWN .SHEB DOGWOOD 24 POT FULI FORM FP 61 CORMS 5ER5EA 'SAND — — HA 21 -P7 17 ,,KEEN ASH _ 54AM:5 PENNSYLVABG 2' CAL. 8 &8 5TRAIGHT LEADER AND PULL. CROWN STRAIGHT Lt5JER MARSHALL'S SEEDLESS ASH 2" 3&B FRAXNUS PENNSYIVANIEA '4MSHALL'S SEEDLESS' CPL. 2 AND FULL CROWN FN 2 BLACK ASII MD 5114415316 LEADER FRAXBIU5 MORA CA.. AND FULL CROWN __GT_ _ LE 67 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2' B&B STRAIGHT I.3 AIIER __ GLFIX101A 14394 NRIOS 'SKYCOLE' CAL. AND ELL: CROWN 57_ TAMARACK 6' B &0 9117AIGH1 L:71UER _ LM10 LAMINA. HT. AN9 41111 40551 SP 36 MISS KIM LILAC /j5 POT SYNAGA PATU'A ''1155 KIM' _ DECIDIUOUS TREES / SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON NAME /LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS A. 3 NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM 2a .49. POT FULL FORM IADURNUU LENIACO PA 3 AMERICAN PLUM 1.3 B&B STRAIGHT LEADER 6' B&B PRUNUS 439591CAU CAI_. AND RA. CROWN VT 61 AMERICAN CRANBERRYBUSH PP POT . FULL FORM 6' 0 &B 0904RN114 1171.0%14 _78 H_. AfCEA PURGERS 0B 29 SWAMP WHITE OAK 2 CAL. 2' B&8 B&B STRAGH7 LEADER AND FULL CROWN STRAIGH' LEADER 6 B &B ()LARGOS BICOLOR OP 55 PIN DAN HT. CUERCUS PAL351015 CAL. . 2_ BFB AND FULL CROWN MR 47 RED BARRON CRAB TA 11 WU'S 'RED BARRON CRAM' 6 9 +B SINGLE LEADER REDMOND LINDEN 2 BLUE SPIRE SPRUCE STRAIGHT LEADER PX;EA GLAK'A '50058.56' 1RLIA A.NER1CAW 'REDM0110' CAL. AND FULL FORM AND FULL CROWN HA 21 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA 24 POT FULL FORM P'HUS RE58105A 'NORWAY COMPACY H DRANGFA ARDORESCENS 'ARAARELLF" HT. AND FULL FORM EVERGREEN TREES / SHRUBS CODE QTY COMMON NAME /LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS 50 32 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' B&8 FULL FORM PICEA GLMICA 056949A NT. PN 14 AUSTRIAN ZONE 6' B&B FULL FORM PMUS N1G5A HT. PP 37 COLORADO SPRUCE 6' 0 &B FULL FORM AfCEA PURGERS HT. P5 14 WHITE 0INE 6 B &B FILL FORM PRA35 51R0855 HT. +5 301 SEA GREEN JUNIPER - 85 POT JUN: PEAUS [KREMS'S SEA GREEN 6 9 +B SINGLE LEADER PGC 18 BLUE SPIRE SPRUCE PX;EA GLAK'A '50058.56' HT. AND FULL FORM P 6 NORWAY COMPACT PINE 6' 9 &B SINGLE LEADER P'HUS RE58105A 'NORWAY COMPACY HT. AND FULL FORM IN LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING RIGHT -CF -WAY I'NE PROPERTY LINE CURD LINE 0 NOS RT' 6o 120 160 SCALE M TER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Exhibit • F • • FRONT ELEVATION- BUILDING A SIDE ELEVATION- BUILDING A w 1,8' • I. 0 0 0 SIDE ELEVATION- BUILD11,4: A 141' • V.V. 0 0 METAL CORT•tv ---- MET. GUTTERS FIRS Filialr_nrelFf-t-w_163131a .Eas.r.,:motteam- 31=5311 II I 11111:=WEIMIIIIIIIIIMIIMMRI IIMEEESEFAK4', I AIIMISISMII 7.• REAR ELEVATION- BUILDING A 1=r1nrailLZI Wo2=1=11111=2=11117WI FIEZIONOMIN IIISW=CATIOX g IERNEEEK NTEGRZL COLOR CM. 12YANEM LINO L.AKE5 MARKETPLACE- LINO LAKE5, MN Ryan Companies US. Inc. 7•1.....44.• May 9, 20111 - t...dritt, Ltd N.0179614 F11.9).4613 Vattli bit • CI • �ELRtS' -8• M'SOFEY— — +R 9E RISTEH �EL =E6 -0 P E1F5 CAP PAINTED 5M007H SCORED FACE CNJ DAWNS PAINTED ROCk0ACE CW E1FS MEDALLION F55 MINCE - - - —EL° RP V- ce BRICK ARCH : -- £4,2 ,2310 .> su`ae,e Atli �■ao ■ar: -_-e: ...I ►, .. .. ... mss, .. 3es ,ai ,=..4. Of MASOPNY— _ EL= 26' -B' +g--TO?F °L - - 40t2F. s EL q6� - NTEORAL COLOR NTEORAL COLOR SPLTTFACE CMU SPLITFACE CMG BRICK BANDING INTEGRAL COLOR SPLITFACE CAW OFRONT ELEVATION NTEORAL COLOR SPLITFACE CAW ERCK BRICK BANDING INTEGRAL COLOR SPUTFACE CNU a PILASTERS (720.1 NTEBRAL COLOR SPLTTFACE CAW BRICK BANDS INTEGRAL COLOR SPLITFACE CYU a PLASTERS ET0P.) PAINTED PANTED 00 CALI x FACE C5500TH FACE' OREAR ELEVATION Ag Y1B' =1-0 MOW DOCIMACE r.14x.1«1"A' .3,:., :3=TM.'e'"iy7'.:.e< .54,94t'5"-_- °"'W' PANTED S50011.1 FACE 005 METAL PANEL PANTED 5M00TH FACE CMIJ. CORNICE ROCNN FA E 050 — _. — �P OFD ON —e TOP OF 11ASOLIRY_. _ - _�T.PPYhSON61� TOP OF MA5000? EL= 116,0' TOP_OF P1LASTEA_e EL= 113,0 El--.w�IF�� TOP OOF 0ANSCOj,a '-EL= TDB'1r 70? 005 -'i E PANTED SMOOTH SCORED CMG BANDING °-e,° °N'� - - - - -- 1 •_ TOP OF ONRY gp OF��ryryLASTEB__ DEL =IpSP=Dp'L -p5 '+��TLTpp l[ppfFPrag�r77'pp -TELL_ —4ELPTI2'=MPA-I E'E — 4Fl= �6'$NSIZOT- +ETO --Pm& - — METAL PANG. PAINTED ROCNFA0E NTEGRAL 00L00 SPLITFACE CYU BPoCK BAWNO BRICK BANDING AMORAL COLOR SPLITFACE CYU TARGET STONES A DIVISION OF TARGET CORPORATION 1000 NICOUET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403 FAN (61p 761.3322 V AWC11 2001 iA6 DAs Pldted by O • ins S. -- - - — - - WICA ONAHON — --� — .= — Milli I= �. -- - -- - - - -- TOP OiaWI5 000 TOP OTANNE10. MALIy TQ__OF 51.086 d= 1010- PAINTED PAINTED SM00TH FACE ROCK FACE <CIL YC CMU EXTERIOR COLOR ELEVATIONS TO 205F 311AS0114 TOP OF FIL sua-+ FLM A8 Ethi bit H • ■111111■itr ■■— ■111■■■■■■■■®■ ■■MUM ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■' t� M ■■ ___ .1121111 KO H t: S ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■■ �i��► ■■ i■ i■ - r! JIii _an a■ i■ IN KKE INA NNANNA Arai immwou,NN FlOIYMOff CCU i Lino Lakes, MN o.Y.bn.d q.: Kohl's o.p.m- aed... r1a TIN WITNd dan.ow od•R Mr ommaseFM* YYlnnu sin SUSS COLOR LEGEND IOMOUrYRM1aWNIIMiMR 0■120170701.1.MSOR Vila! MVP MINIMA COLON MOROI <5 iOMl•am 1mMSYKNMYirld 111COMMm{PRMORAV MmtlrOmRRIDOWIE•IEli 101M ®Ii1AE111l IOMrRYYO1tOGR .10∎0 0014MM i11l \if. ®—a Y 1LL R1�iPAAWO010111 BIf O L'16110DYI1/HRitNYp01MY®II 11M▪ dffbMlA MAORI/MEN ONTNB OW MNCWE8 PRECEDENCE OVERTIE wEMcANON MANUAL FTHE DOCUMENTS HONE 001RICTPIO INFORMATON. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCAR SS:e.t.a' Dim MmNIMOlRw A.I.R or. Dram by cMdRdy MOHADAm shod 846-01 A4 Exhibit • t 20'-O " 9' -0 " Sewer TARGET ICO H L S T -4" 3' -O" • ELEVATION PYLON SIGN A END VIEW One d/f sign One sign located on south side of entry @ Lake Drive & Apollo Crive TARGET FACES Background- white panaflex Copy and colors per tenant specifications and artwork KOHL'S FACES Background- white panaflex Burgundy background with White copy per tenant specifications and artwork Target and Kohl's face internally illuminated with H/O Fluorescent Lighting Aluminum column covers and reveals painted Tight tan w /suede finish to match building architecture and colors Rock Face block base to match Colors in building architecture Lino Lakes Ietters,Markeplace letters, and accent bar To be 2 deep fabricated aluminum mounted flush to first surface. Lino Lakes letters and accent floodlighted from below. Flood lights by others. 12` -0 " 9' -0" 7' -0" Three d/f signs Two signs located on Outlots along Lake Drive and one on outlot along Apollo Drive. TENANT FACES Background- white panaflex Copy and colors per tenant specifications and artwork Signs internally illuminated with H/O Fluorescent Lighting Aluminum column covers and reveals painted light tan w /suede finish to match building architecture and colors Rock Face block bases to match Colors in building architecture 5'0" ELEVATION MONUMENT SIGNS A, B & C Ryan Companies 700 International Ctr. 900 2nd Ave. South Minneapolis, h1\ 5540 Lino Lakes Minnesota Richard Nattila Richard Nattila 7/11/01 1/8"=1'-0" OUTLOT TENANT SIGN DESIGN 5'0" ELEVATION MONUMENT SIGNS A, B & C Ryan Companies 700 International Ctr. 900 2nd Ave. South Minneapolis, h1\ 5540 Lino Lakes Minnesota Richard Nattila Richard Nattila 7/11/01 1/8"=1'-0" EXhiVot • J • • 30' -0 " • 17' -3" 30' -0 " 1 6' -O" One d/f sign each Both signs located on 1 -35 frontage TARGET FACES Background- white panaflex Copy and colors per tenant specifications and artwork KOHL'S FACES Background- white panaflex Burgundy background with White copy per tenant specifications and artwork Target and Kohl's face internally illuminated with H/O Fluorescent Lighting Aluminum column covers and reveals painted light tan w /suede finish to match building architecture and colors Rock Face block base to match Colors in building architecture ELEVATION PYLON SIGN B END VIEW ELEVATION PYLON SIGN C END VIEW Ryan Companies 700 International etr. 900 2nd Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Lino Lakes Minnesota Richard Nattila Richard Nattila 7/12/01 1/8"= t-0" 1 of 2 Sze TARGET 17' -3" 30' -0 " 1 6' -O" One d/f sign each Both signs located on 1 -35 frontage TARGET FACES Background- white panaflex Copy and colors per tenant specifications and artwork KOHL'S FACES Background- white panaflex Burgundy background with White copy per tenant specifications and artwork Target and Kohl's face internally illuminated with H/O Fluorescent Lighting Aluminum column covers and reveals painted light tan w /suede finish to match building architecture and colors Rock Face block base to match Colors in building architecture ELEVATION PYLON SIGN B END VIEW ELEVATION PYLON SIGN C END VIEW Ryan Companies 700 International etr. 900 2nd Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Lino Lakes Minnesota Richard Nattila Richard Nattila 7/12/01 1/8"= t-0" 1 of 2 • • AGENDA ITEM 7B STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -86, Receive Feasibility Report and Set Public Hearing for the Lino Lakes Marketplace Improvements. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: At the May 14, 2001, City Council meeting, a study was ordered to evaluate the construction of public improvements to serve the proposed Target/Kohl's/ Ryan site. This retail development site is also known as the Lino Lakes Marketplace. The petition was limited to request improvements in the vicinity of Apollo Drive /Lake Drive. At the August 13, 2001, City Council meeting, an expanded report was ordered. The expanded report would also include a traffic signal at a second access; turn lanes; bypass lanes; roadway widening; and median construction. The report will be received by the City Council at the meeting Monday evening. Staff is requesting that Council receive the report and call a hearing on the improvement. The hearing is scheduled for September 24, 2001, at which time a detailed review of the feasibility report will be presented. In accordance with Minnesota State Statutes 429, the feasibility report is to be received by council and a public hearing scheduled. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -86, Receive the Feasibility Study and Set Hearing for the Lino Lakes Marketplace Improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 01 -86 be adopted. • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -86 RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING — LINO LAKES MARKETPLACE IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted May 14, 2001 and August 13, 2001, a report has been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the improvement of Apollo Drive, from Lake Drive to the east; and Lake Drive from I -35W to north of 77th Street; by constructing sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and streets, and this report was received by the City Council on August 27, 2001, and, WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such sanitary sewer in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such improvement on the 24th day of September, 2001, in the council chambers of the city hall at 6:30 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 27, 2001. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: C. C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 7 C Jeff Smyser August 27, 2001 Resolution 01 -119, Denying: -Minor Subdivision - Variance From Minimum Lot Depth Joel Voelker Builder, Inc. regarding 7080 Sunset Road ACTION: 3/5 Vote for Resolution 01 -119 BACKGROUND Mr. Voelker has submitted an application for a minor subdivision to split off the eastern portion of the property at 7080 Sunset Road. The property is owned by the current resident, Jon Crenshaw. Mr. Voelker's intent is to create a new single family lot. A variance would be required because the proposed new lot does not comply with the minimum lot depth of 135 feet. ANALYSIS Lino Lakes has sewer and water two blocks to the east in Sunrise Drive. Lots along Sunrise Drive can connect. Utilities are not available to the rest of the neighborhood to the west of those lots. However, Blaine utilities are available to the lots on Sunset Road, and several are connected to the Blaine utilities. The subject property at 7080 Sunset is one of them. Utility service for the proposed new lot would need to connect to the Blaine system. The property is zoned R -1. Utility service would be necessary for the subdivision because Lino Lakes requires public sewer and water service in order to create a lot in the R -1 zone. R -1 lot requirements are: lot size (area) lot width lot depth minimum proposed 10,800 sf 13,213 sf 80 ft 105.02 ft 135 ft 125.81ft • The new lot would not meet the minimum lot depth requirement. A variance would be • • necessary. Findings for Variance In considering all requests for variance and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The existing use of the lot as a single family residence is not threatened by the status quo. There are no unique physical circumstances. The sole purpose of the variance is to allow an additional lot to be created to provide economic gain. Granting an unjustified variance would be conferring a special privilege and would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Whether it is advisable to allow for the creation of additional lots in this neighborhood by splitting the existing lots is a policy question that may merit consideration by the City. However, the application under consideration would create a lot that does not meet current requirements and there is no justification for the requested variance. Without the variance, the minor subdivision cannot occur. Resolution 01 -119 denies both the variance and the minor subdivision and included findings to justify the denials. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ACTION The P & Z considered the application on August 8. A motion to approve the variance and minor subdivision failed 3 -4. A subsequent motion to deny both actions failed for lack of a second. • • OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 01 -119 which: denies the variance based on lack of justification as described above in this report, and; denies the minor subdivision because the lot doesn't meet the minimum lot depth. 2. Approve a revised resolution which would approve the variance and minor subdivision. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Options 2 and 3 • • 01 -119 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-119 RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE AND MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 3, LEXINGTON PARK LAKEVIEW (7080 SUNSET ROAD) WHEREAS, applications have been submitted to the City Council for a minor subdivision and for a variance from the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, the applications are represented on a survey document titled "Minor Subdivision" by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated June 11, 2001 and received by the City the same date, and WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 3, Lexington Park Lakeview, Anoka County, Minnesota and WHEREAS, Section 6 Subdivision 1.B.3 of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance requires a minimum lot depth of 135 feet in the R -1 zoning district and the proposed minor subdivision would create a lot with a depth of 125.81 feet, and WHEREAS, a variance would be required for this reduced lot depth, and WHEREAS, Section 1001.19 of the City Code states that minor subdivision shall conform to all standards and requirements applicable to all subdivisions, and WHEREAS, Section 1001.08, Subdivision Design Standards, Subdivision 6(2) states that lot dimensions shall comply with the requirements specified in the zoning ordinance, and WHEREAS, Section 2 Subdivision 4.A of the zoning ordinance states that in considering requests for variances the City must make a finding of fact which is specified in the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The property in question is already being put to a reasonable use under conditions allowed by the official controls, since there is a single family home on it and the existing use as a residence is not being threatened by the status quo. • • • 2. There are no physical circumstances unique to this property. 3. There is no hardship. The request for the variance is based solely on economic considerations: the desire to make economic profit on the sale and development of a new lot. 4. Granting the requested variance would be conferring a special privilege because the variance is not justified. 5. Granting the requested variance therefore would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 6. The proposed minor subdivision would create a lot that does not comply with the requirements specified in the zoning ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby denies the variance application based on these findings. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby denies the application for a minor subdivision based on these findings. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. z tR A 3 7. 1 10 1 1 J a A 1 i 11 YJ G 11 i N ... E IP L �.�❑ 1.. to — N te• 11 16 –S u. 6 15 N t ..Ip...._ _..._O 16 Ti= 1 `'P ±tL. 10 J hl rttnt±l i t-17 6 116 1 F LI IP 10 11 6 •1~ is 3 13 3 1? 10 11 1D 4 II PO 40 RICE (SUIvIS1O\I GRAPHIC SCALE NORTH N4) FOR: Joel Voelker . 2_73 Stagecoach Trail Lino Lakes MN, 55014 Work: (651) 785 -0907 • h 1` '' t G C' 1 t 40 0 20 40 80 i 1 1 1 160 —Edge of _ Bituminous FA I N T' DRIVE T909.73 • 35 k ■ • 149 4rJ a -- 49.7_ -- _ y..� 0 a ai N a 2.4 904.62 o)1 9 N88.37 '39 "E 904.57 7:747 7 174.48 North line of Lot 1^�� ( La * O O P csi Oo Iz 666 ``��1 `Fnd 1/2" I.P. cR ykst n a '� C ap HSEcoR 33.1 / •tt tASE 9.79 gRC sco- 174.85 ect Existing - Shed 515 b 9sC�o460 PARCEL A 21,964 sq. ft. 0.50 acres (279.21 —plot) 279.50 ID 11) N a) 0 W 0 J 105.02 105.00 6 . 90C.opRO) A-10 1k N88.3 I7 "E RC0R Existing Garage _ PARCEL B 13,213 sq. ft. 0.31 acres 105.00 1� 105.02 279.87» w --south line of Lot 1 y ) 0. I I 1 L_ .. 1 LEGEND: x 912.3 Denotes oh%-- Denotes C Denotes • Denotes o Denotes ./ Existing Elevation Overhead Wire Utility Pole Iron Monument Found Iron Monument Set 1 1o� co Cc 0 J 0 4, c i'. -r t t 1 1 l _ '. 1 I W 0 CO in co- of N• -o 0 1 cn 1 -i-1 Fnd 1/2" I.P. R.LS. #5332 (iN11 r) 1 inch = 40 ft. 1 • EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 3, LEXINGTON PARK LAKEVIEW, Anoka County, Minnesota. PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A That part of Lot 1, Block 3, LEXINGTON PARK LAKEVIEW, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the east 105.00 feet thereof. Subject to any easements or valid restrictions of record. PARCEL B The east 105.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 3, LEXINGTON PARK LAKEVIEW, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to any easements or valid restrictions of record. NOTES: — N.G. V.D. Vertical Datum — Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. — Lot Area = 35,177± sq. ft. (0.81.* Acres) — Building dimensions are approximate only. — No title work furnished to the surveyor. REC JUN 1 1 2001 CITY OF LtNO LAKES DRAWN BY: ERV CHECK BY: JER JOB NO: 01 -327 I DATE: 06 -11 -01 DWG NO: 01327LS. dwg I SHEET: 1 of 1 3 Nn. HATE nr<polo nnM Ft V, 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Ernest G. Rud Date: c%e /l Zoo/ Reg. No. 9808 Sidi. MO 4 SONG, NC. 9180 LEXINGTON AvE. NE CIRGL* PINIES, MN 65014 TIM ('tE,3) "ISb -VAS !) Rest nil, i) 1fS6,w/.491011 • • • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUESTED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 7 - D Cindy Sherman (NAC) August 27, 2001 Resolution 01 — 120 Preliminary Plat 12th Avenue and Holly Drive 3/5 Vote - Preliminary Plat The Land Holding Group has submitted a preliminary plat for the northwest corner of 12th Ave. and Holly Drive. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed a concept plan of the plat on January 10, 2001. The Planning and Zoning Board first reviewed the preliminary plat on February 13, 2001 and the item was tabled pending the TWAFFA, tree preservation plan and grading submittals. The additional information was provided and the Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the application on June 13, 2001. The Board recommended that the project be denied because one lot required a lot depth variance and the criteria for variance had not been satisfied and because of concerns related to access and safety issues; no neighborhood consistency and driveways located on the cul -de -sac (please see attached minutes). This review is based on the following plans submitted on August 2, 2001: Preliminary Plat Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Utility Plan Tree Protection Plan ANALYSIS Project Data: Site total Wetlands Upland Number of lots Gross density Net density (upland only) 8 acres approx. 1.2 acres approx. 6.8 acres 13 1.75 units /acre 1.9 units /acre • • • 12th and Holly August 27, 2001 Page 2 Land Use and Zoning: As shown, the site is zoned for residential development. The site is within the existing MUSA. Site Single Family Resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1X North Single Family Resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1X East Single Family Resid., and Rural Low Density Sewered Resid., Low Density Unsewered Resid. PDO -SF Resid. and Rural South Single Family Resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1X West Single Family Resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1X Lot Sizes and Layout: The R -1X minimum lot size is 12,825 sf of upland. All of the lots meet or exceed this minimum lot size. The proposed lot widths are compliant with the minimum standard of a width of 90 feet for interior lots and 115 feet for corner lots. The minimum lot depth is 135 feet. All the lots comply with this standard. Grading: The applicant has submitted grading information that is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Existing Structures: An existing shed and pole building are located within the new street right -of -way and must be removed. Transportation and Utilities: Utilities exist in both 12th and Holly, and an extension of utilities down the proposed cul -de -sac is proposed. The water main will be looped to 12th Street. The utilities plan is subject to City Engineer review and approvaL Holly and 12th are both major collector roads. The purpose of major collectors is to channel traffic, and direct access from lots is discouraged. The number of lots fronting on 12th Avenue has been reduced from five lots in the concept plan to one lot in the preliminary plat. The number of lots fronting on Holly Drive has increased from zero to one. The rest of the lots are proposed to front on a new cul -de -sac street. Based on modifications to the plan which reduces the number of accesses staff supports the layout. Parks and Trails: A trail is envisioned along Holly Drive, but has not been designed yet. It has not been decided whether the trail will be on the north or south side of Holly. It will be within the road right -of -way. A trail exists on the east side of 12th Ave. as part of Peregrine Pass. Park dedication for this new development would be cash. Wetlands: Wetlands exist in the north central and southeast portions of the site. Although the boundaries of wetlands are shown on the preliminary plat, a wetland • 12th and Holly August 27, 2001 Page 3 delineation report has been submitted. Rice Creek Watershed District has granted a TWAFAA (tabled with approval for administrative action) for the development. Landscaping and Tree Preservation: The site is a former pine tree plantation. A plan for tree preservation has been submitted. The Environmental Board has suggested that some of the trees might be moved. Because the site is located at the intersection of two collector roads staff will work with the applicants to develop a landscaping plan to provide a buffer between the right -of -way and the homes to be constructed in areas where trees are not to be saved. During discussions at the Planning and Zoning Board an issue was raised regarding tree planting issues at Gemini Estates, a Land Holding Group subdivision. According to the City Environmental Specialist, only half of the required trees have been planted. He also indicated that the neighborhood is frustrated with the inefficiency of the landscape installation process. Environmental Board: The Environmental Board reviewed the project on January 3, 2001. The Environmental Specialist's memo includes the Board's comments. OPTIONS 1. Recommend denial of the preliminary plat due to concerns that have not been adequately addressed since the Planning and Zoning Board review. OR 2. Approve the preliminary plat application subject to the following conditions: a) Grading and Utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. b) Existing structures shall be removed from the property. c) Park dedication shall be cash and shall be paid in the rate in effect at the time of final plat. d) A landscaping /buffer yard plan shall be provided for the lots abutting the collector roads where no buffer is provided and shall be installed by a date to be outlined in the development agreement. e) Comments of other City staff and Boards /Commissions RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Option 2. • 01 —120 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -120 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 12th AVENUE AND HOLLY DRIVE WHEREAS, the City has received an application for preliminary plat approval for 12th Avenue and Holly Drive: and WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on February 13, 2001 and continued to June 13, 2001 and WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the preliminary plat for 12th Avenue and Holly Drive with the following conditions: 1. Grading and Utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 2. Existing structures shall be removed from the property. 3. Park dedication shall be cash and shall be paid in the rate in effect at the time of final plat. 4. A landscaping /buffer yard plan shall be provided for the lots abutting the collector roads where no buffer is provided and shall be installed by a date to be outlined in the development agreement. 5. Comments of other City staff and Boards /Commissions Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of August 2001. ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. Resolution 01 -120 Page 2 • • • , Planning & Zoning Board June 13, 2001 Page 26 Mr. Rafferty reiterated his concern regarding having more trees within the development. He asked staff what they would like to see. Mr. Wessel replied this was a commercial center and heavy landscaping was not envisioned for it. Mr. Rafferty again strongly recommended heavy landscaping, especially trees. He believed trees could do a good job for masking the large parking lots. Chair Schaps agreed with Mr. Rafferty with respect to green space in the parking lot. However, he could live with a mixed concept. He also agreed it should be visually congruent with The Village. Mr. Wessel replied staff was very aware of making this development connect with The Village. Ms. Lane disagreed with Mr. Rafferty's suggestion about the landscaping. She stated if they did a good job with landscaping along the outside businesses, the parking lot would not need excessive landscaping. She did not have a problem with a large parking area. Mr. Lyden suggested breaking up the parking area and putting some retail in the middle. Terry O'Connell asked if it was possible to have a parking ramp : : :as part of the Kohl's parking, which would leave more open space. Mr. Wessel replied a gawking structure was never contemplated for this project. There was adequate surface- arldn&.available. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to continue to public,iearingo the July, 2001 meeting, and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5 -0. I. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING..Lancillolding Group, 12th &Holly, Preliminary Plat Schaps reopened the public,i wring at 10:22 Staff presented the applicatioby ,x lain . applicant had submitted a preliminary plat for the northwest corner of 12th Afe. and 1-4 ly Drive. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed a concept plan of the plat on January 101, 2001. The Planning and Zoning Board first reviewed the preliminary plat on February '154200 and the item was tabled pending the TWAFFA, tree preservation plan and grading su mittals. The additional information had now been provided. r Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting the site was zoned for residential development. The site was within the existing MUSA. Staff stated the R -1X minimum lot size was 12,825 sf of upland. All of the lots met or exceed this minimum lot size. The proposed lot widths were compliant with the minimum standard of a width of 90 feet for interior lots and 115 feet for corner lots. The minimum lot depth was 135 feet. All the lots except Lot 8 comply with this standard. Lot 8 had a depth of 127 feet, which required a variance. • Staff indicated the ordinance stated that in considering requests for variance the City shall make a finding of fact that: anning & Zoning Board June 13, 2001 Page 27 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use of used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners was due to physical circumstance unique to his property not created by the landowner. 3. That the hardship was not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Staff stated the Planning and Zoning Board may consider that the site was impacted by wetlands and it was located at the intersection of two collector roads thereby limiting design options as a basis for granting the variance. Staff indicated the applicant had submitted grading information that was subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Staff stated an existing shed and pole building were located within the new street right -of -way and must be removed. Staff indicated utilities existed in both 12th and Holt ;and extension of utilities down the proposed cul -de -sac was proposed. The water main ride to be looped to 12th Street. The utilities plan was subject to City Engineer review and apal. Holly and 12th were both major collector roads. The purpose of major collectcis;,to channel traffic, and direct access from lots was discouraged. The number of lots front .an Avenue had been reduced from five lots in the concept plan to one lot in tlApgliminary plat. The number of lots fronting on Holly Drive had increased from zero to one. The rest oYie lots were proposed to front on a new cul- de -sac street. Based on modificatioiz ts.?- which reduced the number of accesses staff supported the layout. Staff stated a trail was envisioned along Holly Drive, but had not been designed yet. It had not been decided whether the tratlwould'be on the north or south side of Holly. It would be within the road right -of -way. A trail existed on the east side of 12th Ave. as part of Peregrine Pass. Park dedication for this new development would be cash. Staff stated wetlands exist in the north central and southeast portions of the site. Although the boundaries of wetlands are shown on the preliminary plat, a wetland delineation report had been submitted. Rice Creek Watershed District has granted a TWAFAA (tabled with approval for administrative action) for the development. Staff indicated the site was a former pine tree plantation. A plan for tree preservation has been submitted. The Environmental Board had suggested that some of the trees might be moved. Staff stated because the site was located at the intersection of two collector roads staff would work with the applicants to develop a landscaping plan to provide a buffer between the right -of- way and the homes to be constructed. • Planning & Zoning Board June 13, 2001 Page 28 Staff indicated the Environmental Board reviewed the project on January 3, 2001. The Environmental Specialist's memo included the Board's comments. Chair Schaps asked if the developer had been asked about eliminating Lot 8 as opposed to a variance. Mr. Smyser replied there were a couple previous designs of this project the developer had discussed with staff including a number of accesses onto the road. Staff worked out with them to remove most of them. If they make the access on Lot 2 go onto the cul -de -sac, then only Lot 8 and 1 would access the roads themselves. All of the other lots would meet the requirements. There were wetland issues to be addressed also. Because of the safety issues that were addressed with this design, staff was supportive of the variance than the other designs that would require more accesses onto the roadways. He indicated this had been negotiated with the developer. Mr. Lyden expressed concern that Lot 1, 2 and 8 were not a part of the neighborhood. He suggested Lot 8 be made part of Lots 7 and 9 and incorporate Lot 1 and 2 and face Lot 2 to the cul -de -sac. This would make a neighborhood. Mr. Lyden asked about the Gemini Estates tree issue and stated,that issue needed to be done prior to any approval of this development. Jeff Ruus ( ?sp), developer's representative, replied theySvere requesting they proceed with the variance request. He said if they combined lots, thwwouI4 end up nth crooked lot lines and this was not desirable either. With respect to Gemini`Estates, he had no information regarding this. Ms. Lane stated while she also believed in developing eghborhoods, she believed Lots 8 and Lots 1 would become part of the neightorh oods tong side of them and may not specifically be a part of this neighborhood. Mr. Zych agreed that Lots 1,anda2rshoul be,combined because of their size, but had no opinion about Lot 8. Mr. Corson agreed that Lots 1 4nd 2 should be combined due to safety issues. Mr. Ruus stated lot designs did not create neighlbrhoods. He stated the plat met every ordinance, except one, dimension. He stated they could do some lot line manipulation that would meet their criteria, but believed this plat was the solution. He indicated they might have misunderstood what the City wanted. Mr. Lyden asked if the cul -de -sac could be brought the opposite way. Mr. Ruus stated that had not been looked at and he was not sure if the previous designer had looked at those options or not. He stated they were limited however by wetlands and topography. He also indicated that by doing that, he did not believe it would eliminate access off of 12th and Holly. •Mr. Corson made a MOTION to closed the public hearing at 10:45 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Rafferty stated he would like to see the lot lines realigned to create a better neighborhood. He would strongly support that effort so it would all come off of the same cul -de -sac. Mr. Ruus arming & Zoning Board June 13, 2001 Page 29 stated he understood the Board's concerns, but Lot 8 could be the problem. He stated Lot 1 was more workable. Chair Schaps also agreed in combining Lots 1 and 2 and splitting Lot 8. Mr. Ruus stated if that was the direction, they would need to start all over. He indicated the economic impact would affect them and they would need to redesign this area. Mr. Rafferty expressed his concern about them starting over again because of the loss of two lots. He stated this was very close to being a very acceptable plan without redesigning the whole area. Mr. Ruus stated it was his understanding this was what the City was looking for. Ms. Lane stated she did not have concern about Lots 1 and 8, but did have concerns about the access on 12th and Holly and would not support this because of that. Mr. Lyden made a MOTION to deny the preliminary plat application, and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 5 -0. Chair Schaps stated the reasons for denial were as follows: 1. There was a reasonable use of the property in question. 2. There was no plight of the landowner due to physicatercumstances unique to this property. 3. There is an economic consideration. 4. Not applicable. 5. The Ordinance did allow for reasonable use andere was also a question of access and safety. With respect to the preliminary plat, th -eason fib denial was because of access and safety issues; no neighborhood consistenGt andirivewas located on the cul -de -sac. J. CONTINUEDPT3BLIC EARING, Pinnacle Towers, 870 Birch Street, Rezone, Amended GU.P.Amend Zoning Ordinance This item was withdrawn by applicant. Chair Schaps reopened the hearing at 11:00 p.m. There being no comments made, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the Public hearing closed at 11:00 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0. K. North American Composites, Amend Condition of Approval for Site Plan Staff presented the application by explaining the City Council approved a minor subdivision and site and building plan for North American Composites on November 13, 2000. One of the conditions of approval was: 4. The precise concrete panels will be Fabcon Wide Rack 3/8" grooves at 3" O.C. with smooth concrete cattails design, or similar design. Decorative concrete • • • Environmental Memo To: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: May 30, 2001 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations /May 30, 2001 Ryan Target Project he Environmental Board would like to review and comment on the Environmental ssessment Worksheet after the a tall will_ w• i. - _ . - -n opportunity for further review and comment by the mental Board. Brian will look into the feasibility of moving the items currently cheduled to be reviewed in the June P &Z meeting to the July P &Z meeting. Land Holding Group /12th and Holly /Preliminary Plat Review Recommendations: 1. Do not approve this project until the Environmental Board has seen and reviewed an adequate tree inventory and vegetation management plan. 2. This and any subsequent development projects by this developer should not be given consideration by the city until such time as the agreement made in the Gemini Estates development to replace trees has been fulfilled (see letter, attached). If this tree replacement does in fact take place, the city is still advised to act in accordance, and to take appropriate steps to minimize the possibility of a future repeat of this undesirable situation. 3. January 31st Environmental Board recommendations on 12th and Holly project proposal are,. restated. (below): • Environmental Board regards this development proposal as a step backwards in terms of the city's efforts to preserve and conserve open space and • Page 1 • environmental amenities. Conservation development principles are not employed. They should be. • It does not seem to be good planning to have lots with driveways on the collector streets (12th Ave. and Holly Dr.). Removing those lots would better allow for conservation of open space and desirable attributes within the development. • The street appears to be longer than needed. Make it shorter. • Include the standard recommendations as listed on the developer check list from the EB. Environmental Board member Trehus made a motion to deny approval of 12th and Holly project until the Environmental Board has had an opportunity to review an adequate tree inventory and vegetation management plan. Motion 2nd by Connie Grundhofer Motion approved/All in favor. 'Oland -adows West 3rd Addition Findings: 1. Highland Meado s West 3`d addition is not a 'onservation Development. 2. The Highland Mea••ws West 3`d. Ad significant tree loss. 3. The Oak Savanna on the site should be preserved, conservation developmen 4. The Environmental B management. Recommendatio on development proposal plans for a d of the parcel should and many other trees on his could be made possible through utilization of iples and a P.D.O. rd did no ave adequate information on surface water 1. If this pro sal moves forward essentially s it stands, this developer should satisfy city that all steps possible have -en taken to preserve trees. To acco ►.lish this with the existing plat, it seeme• ppropriate to reduce the scope of t grading plan, which may dictate the buildi • of structures without walkout b..ements. The developer has objected to this suggestion, but has not demonstrated that satisfying the city's concems about the trees constitutes a hardship. Vinton Dy MiK1rehus: • Page 2 • FRA McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. August 2, 2001 Mr. Jeff Smyser, Planner City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 SUBJECT: 12th Avenue and Holly Drive Development Land Holding Group MFRA #13306 Dear Mr. Smyser: Engineering c Planning E. Surveying RECEIVED AUG 0 2 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES At the Planning Commission meeting on June 13, 2001 it was recommended that this preliminary plat be denied based on the following reasons: 1. There was a tree issue with a non - related project, Gemini. It is a development being done by the Land Holding Group. 2. The Commission did not see adequate hardships for the granting of the lot depth variance on Lot 8 Block 1. 3. One commissioner expressed the desire to have all the lots on the cul -de -sac so that every lot would be a part of a close -knit neighborhood. 4. There was a concern about the number of lots (three), which had direct access to either 12th Avenue or Holly Drive. The action of the commission caught us by surprise since during concept review several changes had been made to the initial preliminary submittals. The plans reviewed by the commission had been amended and had received concept approval. During concept review one lot had been eliminated and the cul -de -sac had been realigned. It was thought that all the major changes had been accomplished. After having already made these changes, which significantly affected the feasibility of the project, the commission's suggestion to just eliminate two more lots was simply not feasible. 15050 23rd Avenue North • Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 763/476 -6010 • fax 763/476 -8532 e -mail: mfra@mfra.com Mr. Jeff Smyser, Planner August 2, 2001 • Page 2 It was possible, however, to make minor changes that do address two of the plat related concerns raised by the commission. Lot 8, Block 1 was reconfigured and no longer needs a depth variance. The access to Lot 2, Block 1 was removed from Holly Drive and reoriented to the cul -de -sac. This particular lot will now have an end - loaded garage. In summary, we are requesting that this preliminary plat request, with the changes noted, be put on the City Council agenda for August 27, 2001 for their consideration. Overall three major concerns of the Commission have been removed or alleviated in that 1) the Gemini tree issue has been resolved, 2) there is no longer a need for a variance, and 3) one of the Holly Drive accesses have been removed. In the meantime we will be pursuing an extension of our permit approvals with the watershed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Very truly yours, t Rood, P.E. JJR:jky s:\main:\Lan 13306 : \Correspondence\smyser7 -30 • Preliminary Site Development Plan NORTH 200 for 12th Avenue and Holly Drive Lino Lakes, Mirinesota W 00 CVO O 0 z Presented by: Land Holding Group, Inc. 389'41'26"W 580.81 6 7 fke { EnSnMa ;� HOU LL,.,_, 11 'CAR E 13 10 9 • I • • / LOi.L'C DRIVE. _ Site Plan .I t (5. 0M. •vn997.99 RECEIVED AUG 0 2 2001 OF LINO LAKES G;z VICINITY MAP NO SCALE Index of Sheets 1 Title Sheet 2 Preliminary Plat 3 Preliminary Grading Plan 4 Preliminary Utility Plan 5 Preliminary Tree Protection Plan 6 Traffic Control & Detail Sheet 7 Detail Sheet OWNER /DEVELOPER: Land Holding Group, Inc. 4704 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 PLANNER /ENGINEER: McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Phone: (763) 476 -6010 Fax: (763) 476 -8532 Contact: Jeff Elliott r m yy :cs Frank • • I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.. Name Date Registration Number Jeff Elliott 6/11/01 19174 Scale SHOWN Designed RJE Drawn JHB Date 6/11/01 Checked Approved Engineering • Planning • Surveying 15050 2371 Avenue North • P7yauth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 763/476 -6010 • lax 763/476 -8532 E— Moi/.• mfraQmfra.com Client Land Holding Group White Bear Labe, MN Project 12th Avenue. and Holly Drive Lino Lakes, MN Sheet idle Title Sheet Sheet Revisicr 1 MFRA FILE NO : 13306 UJ N O (V Po O Z CABLE BO TEL 80X S89'41'26 "W Et..._.. _ 279' . - - - - ro 127' . 0. ,\�- -- --� - r 135' 20' 1 _J I 1 1 I r I I \\ �a DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT -lam \ I / \ \`'-'1., 7 1 / • / \ `''O I / 6 j C\ \ o I 8 \ o 735r I^ - J ,{ / C °.1. 7-- /�� L J iN /6 / 56' / � / �. - - �O' 9 - _ P NN \ 1 A / 10 � i N. / %6 / I a °L - - - -- - 2+s-- - - --I ` • I � j- 1 } - 11 1.g, m - I -- I---- �6} - -- 1 E S': NM; HCggE 1 ■AR '• J� I's I 3 I - - I I 1 L--- 3-i3.- - -I --J ,-- - - --, I gI 12 1 0 I 1 I , m • f - '35- _- 7 - F.5. I I 11 I11 I Ii 10'' 1 1 +- Lee -J ♦„• 95' F. I - ~ loo I I 1 2 IM I^ 1 0 1D'-.1 L - %.- -J 1 1 6' I L - -t - - J 269' DRAINAGE AND 1 �� 13 1_10. 6 L - -I 1 -- 1 I 273' UTILITY EASEMENT TEL ea HOLLY DRIVE 580.81 689'41 r26 1 NI TOe OF CA1 ELEY - 909,47 25 50 NORTH 100 200 DEVELOPMENT NOTES 1. GROSS SITE AREA 348,488 5' OR 8.00 ACRES 2, PROPOSED - ZONING 3. LOT TABULATIONS: - NUMBER OF UNITS - MINIMUM LOT AREA - AVERAGE LOT AREA* - MINIMUM LOT 910TH AT 40' SETBACK - MINIMUM LOT DEPTH - MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT CORNER PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 13 12,830 SO FT 21.800 SO FT 90 FEET 135 FEET 115 FEET *EXCLUDES OUTLOTS 4. EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. 5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT AND ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST 100 SQUARE FEET. 6. STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL. 7. LOT SIZE TABULA110N/IMPERVIOUS COVER/BUILDING COVER IMPERVICVS COVER $UIIDING COVER LOT SIZE (S,F.1 X OF LOT (S.F.1 X OF LOT LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 LOT 6, BLOCK 1 LOT 7. BLOCK 1 LOT 8, BLOCK 1 LOT 9, BLOCK 1 LOT 10, BLOCK 1 LOT 11, BLOCK 1 LOT 12, BLOCK 1 LOT 13, BLOCK 1 TOTAL LOT SIZES: 12,830 SF 15,720 SF 30,170 SF 30,910 SF 16,340 SF 39,500 SF 14.100 5F 14,700 SF' 13.720 SF 16,240 SF 23,750 SF 24,180 SF 30.980 SF' 283,140 SF 3,830 3,610 4,320 3,640 3,890 3,590 3,590 3,810 3.610 3,580 3,800 3.540 3.560 48.370 30X 23% 14% 125 245 95 255 26% 265 225 16% 155 175 2,450 2,450 2,690 2,450 2,450 2,450 2.450 2.450 2.450 2,450 2,450 2.450 2 J511, 32.090 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: li tl t 5-'T- r-10 - i I -5 r-10 J- -JL ___ -L i I BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY UNES AND REAR LOT LINES. AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. TYPICAL EASEMENTS AUG 0 2 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES 195 165 95 B5 155 6% 175 175 18% 105 105 105 11% • • • Revisions No. Dote By Remarks T I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that om a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the lawn of the State of Minnesota. Name Date Registration Number Jeff Elliott 6/11/01 19174 Scale SHOWN Designed RJE Drawn JHB Dote 6/11/01 Checked Approved Engineering • Planning • Surveying 15050 23rd Avenue North. Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 763/476 -6010 • fax 763/476 -8532 E- Moil.• mfra0m! %eom Client Land Holding Group White Bear Lake, MN Project 12th Avenue and Holly Drive Lino Lakes, MN Sheet Title Preliminary Plat Sheet 2/7 Revision MFRA FILE NO : 13306 • 5:1 SLOPE UPLAND BUFFER 13,9.00 SF NEW WETLAND 25,150 \SF 10 a S } SILT FENCE ■ r'. 0A SILT FENCE S8 '41'26 "W 58` 7 \ r 916 ■ a EXISTING DRIVEWAY & 15" CMP TO I BE REMOVED • `i ]STING 140UST: OAP 3 r� 910 'CABLE BO0 Tit -ear- LEGEND POND 2 NML 907.7 FIR 908.0 10YR 908.9 100YR 909.9 ? POND 11 TEL 60 n • SILT FENCE EXISTING DRIVEWAY & 15" CMP TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WETLANDS PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL FENCE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER DRAINAGE ARROW DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT LIMIT 1,Y DRIVE S.VII0 �- TJ % -a C5 X (AAA) X 9,0.1 920 S89'41 `26" W - _._ ._ ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE 25 50 EMERGENCY I OVERFLOW I ELEV. =910.0 SILT FENCE 1991.41- ._' Y TOP OF 0111 01001 - 809.47 X i; EX, MH, 906.771• /1V.397.23 SILT FENCE NORTH 100 200 0010115 mom PAD SAMOA MEA At 0199110 ooze (500 WO PAD GRAINS SET CENIORNE 912.0 WO-� 920.$ GARAGE FLOOR O.EVAOM (AS VON ON GRADING 0 I10 P ONO 0 RACT01 TO GRADE TO RDS DEVATO 0 I X• TOOL 1 PROPOSES WARM CURB INNS CANN LX' MINE SMPACIED 5111ICLRA0 9AO8L1 1.5 NUT ENTRY 01I0017 (SONO) 2d' 10001117 (LW 7.5 9410015(110) 001 arr. SNOW ON WONG RAN X' EMI. COIIRAC100 TO MAYNIE SOIL MAIN% AS REOLRED 90 SOLT 01GNER • TIE FRONT N010 WW1 009 FAO! UM1 TYPE 59519E 05 PUNS SL110 Is REAR as' 1.0 15 ND 29 OI RMB<ER (NON- NAL9891) UNITS. 11E FRONT Na0 OOMN AMU. EX101D FROI FRONT OF 99LONG PAD TO 20' TEEM REM 1017 OF MALI= PM 01 SLOPE AS REFIRED 91111E 5011.5 DONOR LOT ON 5082045 PADS 4014891 R PODMERR 10 010 -0E-SAC IC WETLAND IMPACTS: 3,700 SQ FT 13.100 SQ FT 16,800 SQ FT MITIGATION REQUIREMENT 16,800 SQ FT X 2 = 33,600 SQ FT PROPOSED MITIGATION UPLAND BUFFER - 13,900 SQ FT NEW WETLAND - 25.150 SQ FT TOTAL MITIGATION - 39,050 SQ FT ►900 PIOP000) F1NO[0 00115.8 KNEES DAM COMM Ma Root OMEN 11/11(01i (YA) NCONNENOD ECM REF L0010A1(10I NUT ERRS 959091 (SETA) 9RONT ROM (=PI AS NO1991 (5M GRAM ROCS WV, OMPT AS X019)) (902.5) TYPICAL LOT NO SCALE RANT O' RAY 00191 (GRADE 0O 0 S AMOM NOTES: PROPOSED 0X9101 09.100 BACIOXL WN NOME C �• •Qq �OISTARE MAIWAL (407 £X81116 GRADE TYPICAL BUILDING PAD GRADING DETAIL NO SCALE A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF T1.110 PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTUTES. 17 SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTIUTES WHICH CONFLICT MTH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 9100114 ON THE PLANS THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UT1UTES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CAWING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (1 -800- 252- 1166). C. SILTATION ANO EROSION CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBIUTY FOR CONTROWNG ALL SILTATION ANO EROSION OF 7510 PROJECT AREA. ALL EROSION CONTROL AND SILTATION CONTROL MEASURES `MIL COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA'S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL AND THE CT( OF UNO LAKES' POJCY FOR EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL EROSON ANO SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT UNITED TO STAKED STRAW BALES, ROCK ENTRANCES AND /OR SILT FENCES. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE OATH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBIUTY INCLUDES ALL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY, AT HIS/HER OPTION, DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR IN HIS/HER ME7HO00 AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR VALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND EFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE SILT REMOVED FROM THE PONDIN0 AREAS BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABUSHED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR APPLYING FOR THE MPCA GENERAL STORM WATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPUANCE OATH AND MONITORING 1594E REQUIREMENT OF 1140 MPCA PERMIT. G. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. E. THE CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND DEFINITIONS OF TYPES OF MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN MN /0011 "STANDARD SPECIRCATONS FOR CONSTRUCTION` 2000 E0IT0N5 ANO ALL SUPPLEMENTS. F. THE EXISTING TOPSOIL ON THIS SITE VARIES IN DEPTH. IT I5 THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSBIUTY THAT ALL SURFACE VEGETATION AND ANY TOPSOIL OR OTHER LOOSE, SOFT OR 07HERNSE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREET AND BUILDING PAD AREAS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY EMBANKMENT IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE SOILS REPORT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL TO 8E SPREAD TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 INCHES BY THE CONTRACTOR IN AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED BY THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION. RECEIVED N01E I. ENE HEODHT STPMA1101 RETAETO 11E GAAGE RON AND THE 9ASNOIT FLOOR IS MPRODNA101Y XI FEEL UNLESS NOTED OINDIWSC 2 1TE DESIGNATED NOD CORI SHALL BE 04101£110 AWCSS NE W11RE RION of NE LOT (SIDE LOT UAE TO 90E LOT LINE). 1 SOL CORRECTION MI EAR! BUIDNO PAD 9151 AS A 400944 COMPLETED NE RAL NON Of NE LOT (60E LOT UE 10 510E LOT RE)• GN GARNER 101E 50L COREC11011 FGR AMR MONO PAD SNAIL BE =VLERD AWN BON SEES OF THE 106 M ALLOW HOME TO BE NNSTROCTED ALONG ENTRE FRONTAGE • A S0E RULING PADS MAY ff NEATER NAN 50 FEET N GUN (FROI ROM TO Mat) AS 01011 CN NE OAaNG PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO =Ma INNEN PRIOR 10 CRLYENmENT OF CONSRIICMN 10 REMER 04! 1100 5. F A NUT 950011 ANTIS TO RE CDIS9RXR9 CR A 10NO1T INT. 090 RIDER MAY MI R CONSIDER LOWING NE XOE MANN 05 FEET FROM OE M904 GRADE IF NE 001£1940 WANT SID an TALL ALOE 0E5971 0AE10E9 A USERS MT *1 UBJ 11 a0 FEET FOR FR 41 TO REM 851041IFI SEPARATE/1 MN ROAMER WITS. F 00880 RAN08001 NAILS ARE USED. TENT MN 910.0075 WINE PLWS 1 4:1 SAFE M9LE0. N LLU OF LI RIPE. C R4 51AMAR05 MAY UNIT 09'15 O' TOP5O. RESPREI9 ON PM. REIN MN ONO MO Sa15 sow. 0. RIMER 501,5 REPORT REC919101591104 TO COIPIO4 1:1 0,01 50X0. C. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE STREET, STREET RICHT -OF -WAY OR BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE '4111 THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE QUALITY COMPACTOR METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MN/DOT 2105.302. H. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REWIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED IN THE STREETS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE MTH 11He SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTUNED IN TAN/DOT 2105.391; EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD AREA SHALL BE COMPACTED 44 ACCORDANCE W1111 THE SOILS REPORT. I. ALL DISTURBED AREAS. EXCEPT ROADWAYS. SHALL 8E RESTORED WITH MINIMUM 4- TOPSOIL AND SEEDED AND MU101-100 WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING. SEEDING SHALL BE 149 /001 MIXTURE N0. 50A (OR APPROVED EO)AL). DORMANT SEEDING AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED, MULCHED AND DISC ANCHORED. STRAW MULCHING QUANTITY SHALL BE 2 TONS PER ACRE. WHERE SLOPES EXCEED 3:1, A POLYPROPYLENE NETTING OR W000 FIBER BLANKET SHALL BE PROVIDED AND STAKED OVER THE MULCHED AREA. FERTILIZER (15- 10 -10) SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 400 POUNDS PER ACRE • J. TOLERANCES THE STREET SUBGRAOE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT *ERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECE/VE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO 4THIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REDUIREO ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF . THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS K. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROMOING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS. DIRECTIONAL 9CRS, FLAGMEN ARO UGHT5 TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. L ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY A 508.5 ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL RE0U1RE0 SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER M. WHEN 114E SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH MITIGATION AREA5 ABOVE THE NWL AS DIRECTED 8Y THE OWNER. THE SEEDING SHALL COMPLY NTH' 1.114/00T MIXTURE N0. 25A NTH SE FORM MIX AND APPLIED AT A RATE Of 50 POUNDS PER ACRE THE SEEDED AREA SHALL BE MULCHED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED ANO MULCH THE M)GATION AREAS BELOW THE NM. BUT ABOVE THE E7a5TIN0 WATER LEVEL AS DIRECTED BY 111E OTHER. THE SEEDING SHALL COMPLY KITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION NO 3876 NTH THE USE OF THE MN/DOT MIXTURE NO. 25A NTH NET FORS MI0 AND APPLIED AT A RATE OF 50 POUNDS PER ACRE 114E SEEDED AREA SHALL BE MULCHED. THE MULCH SHALL COMPLY NTH MN /DOT SPECIFICATION 3882, TYPE 1. THE MULCH SHALL BE APPUED AND ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /0011 SPECIFICATION NO. 2575.3, F1. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE THE MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED MTH A DISK, CLODBUSTER OR OTHER APPROVED EQUIPMENT. Revisions No. Dote By Remarks I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name Dote Registration Number Jeff Elliott 6/11/01 19174 Scale SHOWN Designed RJE Drawn JHB Date 6/11/01 Checked Approved Engineering • Planning • Surveying 15050 Ord Avenue North • Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 763/476 -6010 • lax 763/476 -8532 f- Moil.• mlraNYmfracom Client Land Holding Group White Bear Lake, MN Project AUG 0 2, ? trUlheet Title 12th Avenu4 n ; F ; 'NOj iiminary Holly Drive Goading Plan Lino Lakes, MN Sheet 3/7 Revision MFRA FILE NO : 13306 CABLE BCD TEL BOX 9 L E 43 LFI 187 CMP N / N 4 3 -- -i8- - -.i8- CM N N N 5 N N J 28 LF 18' RCP 8 0.500 CB 1 RI14- 915.021 NV- 909.41 2 72 LF 18' DAP F S INV =907.5 6 Lowl MH 8 9 11 C8MH 2 1 2 RIMa915.02 LINV W- 909.27 INV 0909.17 130 LF 18' RCP 8 0.900 FES INV -908.0 13 H RIM 1 •910.2 IN 89E L -_ FES INVm907.0 THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTRITIES ARE SHORN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE 7HE EXACT LOCATION OF AU. EXISTING UTLILTIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES P44CH MIOHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 38 IF 8" PVC G 0.408 1 TNlr^' ya:is POND 2 NWL 907.7 1YR 908.0 1079 909.9 1007R 909.9 POND 11 TEL BO tl 9• li t • y„ aaa. ,E.' NOTES: 1, ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 52, WITH 8.0 FOOT MINIMUM COVER. 2. AU. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC A5T14 3034 SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 3. WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 1' TYPE K COPPER. 4. SANITARY SERVICES AND CLEANOUTS SHALL BE 4' PVC 5040001E 40. 780P1117 UNE ITMEAWIN 0090 099ENT 0E11E9 ONE LEGEND LOT meet TYPICAL SERVICE DETAIL 90 50N.0 EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER DRAINAGE do UTILITY EASEMENT LIMIT uti 0---- sr B01T OF WAT > -0CB • t-- PROPERTY UNE PROPERTY UNE 60' t � OP OF OM 8.14-.: 908.47 F.X. 1,... 77- INV.5"32.99 B0TVI rv, j O TEL O ■ GAS 0 ELEC. H 2.00. 0/440N TRENCH g OT.V. ELEC. 50098 I- 2.5' 1,1 O r CURB I 10 36" GAS 3 :1 (MAXI MN. 1 /4'lET' T.V. 0 o TEL 0 ELEC. GAS 0 W.M. O NOTE: MINIMUM R/W CROS5990 DEPTH 30 ". URBAN STREET UTILITY LOCATION NO SCAIE 25 50 100 NORTH 200 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ALL CONSTRUCTION YATHN THE SITE PLAT RIGHT OF WAY AND DESIGNATED AREAS. THE BUILDING PADS ARE NOT TO 8E DISTURBED . 8. REGRADE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO ORIGINAL GRADING PLAN. UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES A. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. 1. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO CITY OF UNO LAKES, AND MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS. • 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 3. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS. 8. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR -35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, WITH 8.0 FEET MINIMUM COVER. 4. ALL .STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE WITH R -4 JOINTS, AND RUBBER GASKETS. 5. RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn /DOT CLASS 3. C. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND /OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTIUTIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR, BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454 -0002. D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. E. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGIN OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. F. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD. G. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS AND THE ENCLOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL MAP AND NOTES. H. ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTIUTY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE GEOTECHNICAL FIRM WILL BE SELECTED BY THE OWNER. I. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. J. THE TREES AND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND /OR ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT ARE OF PRIME CONCERN TO THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. HE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE TREES. WHICH ARE TO BE SAVED TO BE SURE THAT EQUIPMENT IS NOT NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN WORKING ADJACENT TO TREES. SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, HE SHALL OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE OPERATION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS' OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS. THE BROKEN UMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED.•TO MINIMIZE ANY AUTHORIZATION BY THE ENGINEER. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED <. INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL PAYMENT NALL BE MADE. A PRELIMINARY TREE PROTECTION PLAN IS ATTACHED. RECEPI AUG 0 2 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES • Revisions No. Date By Remarks I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Name Date Registration Number Jeff Elliott 6/11/01 19174 Scale SHOWN Designed RJE Drown JHB Date 6/11/01 Checked Approved Engineering • Planning • Surveying 15050 23rd Alamo North • Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 76.3/475-6010 • fox 763/476 -8532 E- Moil.• mfraeln1%aam Client Land Holding Group White Bear Lake, MN Project 12th Avenue and Holly Drive Lino Lakes, MN Sheet Tillie' Preliminary Utility Plan Sheet 4/7 Revision MFRA F111 NO 13305 • Preliminary Tree Pro to cti on Plan for 12th Avenue and Holly Drive S89'41'26 "W 581'$1 - TR AR SANE 906 4 zci- } - 4"f.ABLE 10Y TEL-sox.! -- 3i�- -- - ._._. ....kiAl LY__ DRIVE P0140 2 INK 907.7 1YR 909.0 10YR 909.9 100YR 909.9 POND It TEL 9O 1 I I ,.'=:,1' ,1 ON..RE7.?4 CL O 0 O c0 O ¢1 O I =' r; NI im r s 2 1 1 EY. M1}. INV -.907.99 6' MIN WOODLOT TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GRADING OR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. STANDARD 48" HIGH SNOW FENCE OR ORANGE SAFETY FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE. ALL UTILITIES INSTALLED AS A PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE WITHIN STREET RIGHTS —OF —WAY OR WITHIN DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. LEGEND EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WETLANDS PROPOSED TREE FENCE PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER ~ 57 > -a Ca 920 ► » 7T 25 50 100 NORTH l CT • Revisions No. Dote By Remarks I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under ray direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name Date Registration Number Jeff Elliott 6/11/01 19174 Scale SHOWN Designed RJE Drawn JHB Dote 6/11/01 Checked Approved Engineering • Planning • Surveying 15050 all Avenue North • Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 763/476 -6010 • fax 763/475 -8532 E -Moil: mfra®mfra.com Client Land Holding Group White Bear Lake, MN Project . 12th Avenue and Holly Drive Lino Lakes, MN Sheet Title Preliminary Tree Protection Plan Sheet 5/7 Revision MFRA F1LE NO : 13306 4 • RINGS (3 MIN., 1.0' MAX. OF RINGS Je MORTAR). — 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIDE BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING re MANHOLE FINISH SMOOTH ON THE INSIDE NO MORTAR ON INSIDE. PRECAST COVER SLAB (TYPE 2) 2 STRIPS BITUMASTIC SEAL ON SLAB JOINTS. NO CEMENT. PRECAST BASE MK DIED SLAB THICKNESS 48' 8" 54" -122" 108 8' 10" 120" 12" 'INFI- SHIELD" SEAL OR EQUAL. NO WOOD STALL BE USED FOR ORATING CASTING; CEMENT MORTAR OILY. CAST IRON WNNOLE FRAME 40 COVER AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. MANHOLE STEPS SAKI. BE CAST IRON, AWWMIM OR STEEL REINFORCED PLASTIC PER A4M 0474 LOCATION SHALL BE AS NOTED N TIE SPECIFICATIONS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS 40 EASE SLAB PER A5N 6470. FURNISH PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS WHIN O-RING GASKETS a LUBRICANT EXCEPT AS 0I14ERW5E SPECIFIED. A T2. 00 le 00IREL SECTION SHALL DE INSTALLED UNDER 774E CONE N/IENEVTR POSSIBLE FILL OPENING BETWEEN PIPE 11 MN WALL METH CEMENT MORTAR. INSIDE SURFACE SHALL BE MESHED 114001H. STORM SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 409 NO SCALE REMOVE CURB BOX BOLTS RINGS (3 MIN.. 1.0' MAY. OF RINGS AND MORTAR). 1/2• MORTAR ON OUTSIDE BETWEEN RINGS. CASTING & MANHOLE FINISH 27• SMOOTH 040 INSIDE NO MORTAR ON INSIDE CEMENT MORTAR -Y i I I I .�.,+m3AAi iii r- - E NO WOOD SHALL BE USED FUR ADJUSTING CASTING: CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST ANON CATCH BASIN FRAME a COVEN CASTINGS PER SPECIFICATIONS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE CONE SECTION R PRECAST 815E PR ASV C470. FILL OPENING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE WALL WON CEMENT MORTAR NSIOE SURFACE 448. BE FANGED 541007K • 1144.441 PIPE COVER CAN 56 REDUCED FROM 4' TO 74 -0" WITH INSTALLATION OF PERFORATED PIPE ORAIN PER "GRANULAR SUBCU= MO PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN. OCTAL CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 NO SCALE "IN1- 5HIE1.0" SEN- OR EQLAN... 2 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIOE, BETWEEN RIGS, CASTING lc MANHOLE. FINISH SMOOTH ON INSIDE NO MORTAR ON INSIDE RINGS (3 MIN., 1.0' MAX. OF RINGS to MORTAR). 3 A 3 48" CEMENT MORTAR SECTION A —A 6' PRECAST BASE SLAB ELEVATION 80 W000 401E BE USED FOR ADJUSTING 243174 R CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST WON MANHOLE FRAME de COVER AS PER SPWOICA90NS. WNHO1 STE♦PP5 SHALL BE CAST IRON, 4NNINW OR STEEL RONFURCE0 PLASTIC PER 4VNH ES Ci0' LOCATION 140OSA IC RE AS NOTED 141E SPECIF5 @KOLAS. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE WNN01E 5685085 51 BASE ore PER AS114 0470. 44041410 PRECAST M•NNNE SECTIONS WON 0-848 GASKETS k LU4RIGWT O8CEPT AS 01494006E SPECIFIED. A 12. 08 19• WM. SECTION SHALL DE. N5TALIID UNDER 174E CONE 8ONOIED POS400P ELL OPENING SEMEN PIPE 8 NM WALL WIN CEMENT MORTAR RACE SAME SHALL BE 4•600 54400144. STORM SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 407 NO SCALE (PIPES 27" OR LESS) 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIDE, BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING k CATCH BASIN. FINISH SMOOTH ON INSIDE. NO MORTAR ON 1NS10E. REMOVE CURB BOX BOLTS RINGS (3 MIN., 1.0' MAX. OF RINGS 8 MORTAR), vAR. (4' MIN.) VARIABLE 1NF1- SHIELD" SEAL OR EQUAL PRECAST DOVER SLAB (TYPE 2) PLACE 2 STRIPS BITUMA2TIC SEAL ON SLAB JOINTS. /-- CEMENT MORTAR PRECAST BASE 1,01 DNA. SLAB THICKNESS 48" 8• 54" -192" 108 8" 10' 120" 12" NO 8000 SMALL RE U5E0 FOR 0000 740 CASTING: CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST BON FRAME 18 ORATE Gomm. PER SPECIFICATIONS. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON. AUMINNA OR STEEL REINFORCED PLASTIC PER A5TM C476 LOCATION SHALL BE AS 1401E0 IN THE 5PECWCARON5, PRECAST RE0NFLWCED CONCPEIE BASE SLAB 18 COVER SI.H8 PER A5711 CAM. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCAEIE N04110LE seapor40 PER AS1M 0478, OR B "- CONCRETE 008801E 8.001 WN I/O" MORTARED OTTEAIOR. NRNIS1 PRECAST CONCRETE AMNNOLE SECTIONS WEI O-RING CASKETS 44 00016CAT? FSIOEPr AS onLERW15E 5P20727, ETU. OPENING BETWEEN PIPE ANC WNNOLE WALL WIN CEMENT MORTAR. RACE SURFACE SHALL R FINISHED SMOOTH. • 4N4AU44 PIPE COVER CAN BE REDUCED FROM 4' TO 2' -5' WITH INSTALLATION OF PERFORATED PIPE CRAN PER 'GRANULAR 4NBCLn ANC, PERFORATED PIPE ORNN' DEG& CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE, TYPE 406 NO SCALE ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE NO SCALE NOTE THE ROCK ENTRANCES 51AU_ 8E INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START O; ANY 511E WORK THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED FI LL0ri1NG EACH RAINFALL. MAINTENANCE OF THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL INCLUDE A TOP 04600NG OF NEW GRAVEL. OR REMOVAL AM REPLACEMENT OF 110E GRAVEL AS NEEDED, TO KEEP THE ENTRANCE FREE FROM COLLECIFD MUD. B =UL. 5' METAL OR 2'42"w000 FENCE POST CEOTECILE WITH NET BACKING BACKP11L CM/TEXTILE TO OVERLAP THROUGH TRENCH. NOTE ; -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO 448001 3880, T7PE 8. - FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS OR AS DIRECTED 81 ENGINEER. r SILT FENCE 740 SCALE ROAD CLOSED LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY R11 -3 60"= 30" REFER T9 ADVANCED ROAD CLOSED SIGN FOR POST REQUIREMENTS (PROVIDE 2 POSTS) LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY SIGN NO SCALE • (2) - (2) • (2) LEGEND "ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED AHEAD" SIGN "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY" SIGN TYPE III BARRICADE 140.1" CT E m IRJ ASH ST TRAFFIC CONTROL MAP NO SCALE NOTES: 1. FURNISH AND PLACE ADDITIONAL BARRICADES, TRAFFIC CONES, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. (INCIDENTAL) 2. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE "MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" (MMUTCD), INCLUDING APPENDIX "8" DATED NOV. 1992, OR MOST CURRENT .UPDATE. 3. DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND WATER SERVICE LINE ON 12TH AVE., HOLLY DR. MUST REMAIN OPEN TO LOCAL TRAFFIC. 4. DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE SEWER, WATERMAIN AND SERVICES ON HOLLY DR., 12TH AVE. MUST REMAIN OPEN TO LOCAL TRAFFIC. 5. THE ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE ROAD BEING CLOSED. THE CLOSURE SIGNS MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL DATES OF THE CLOSURE INDICATED ON THE SIGN. THE CONTRACTOR CAN PROVIDE ANOTHER SIGN WITH JUST THE DATES BUT THE DATES MUST BE ATTACHED WITH THE ROAD CLOSED SIGNS. l/r = 8" GALVANIZED BOLTS NTH CUT WASHERS (CARRIAGE HEX OR 50.) 4 25 45/11 FANGED CHANNEL 115 9(34 POST (MOOT 3401) 12' OVERLAP - 4N01CR 70114 (2) 5/16.0 I' Ban 041H WA5HE85 AND LOCK NUTS 3.0 15 /11 FLANGED CHANNEL BON POST (MOOT 3401) ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED SIGN NO SCALE 7 r worriammi II►�A+ NOMINAL 1'06'08' Na 1 26440E LIN860 1 TREATED O I I t ors _—J I U' "X4'%8 u N0. 4 2 GRAL>E LJ LUMBER OR BETTER QA.TERNAI74 MATERIALS FOR POSTS MAY BE USED WEN APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. NOTE£ 401E BARRICADE 80AR0 FACE SURFACES SHELL BE FULLY RERECTORIZEO ALTERNATE SILVER -NHITE AND RED 0171736, 051NG REFLECTIVE 5HEERNG CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNOOT TEC 33522A25, STANDARD N0. 2 EXISTING GROUND T -I/2" 7_ • s TYPE III BARRICADE NO SCALE VE D AUG 0 2' 2001 LINO LAKES 'i Revisions No. Dote By Remarks I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name Date Registration Number Jeff Elliott 6 /11 /01 19174 Scale SHOWN Designed R,E Drawn JHB Dote 6/11/01 Checked Approved Engineering • Planning • Surveying 15050 23rd Avenue North • Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 763/476 -6010 • fox 763/476 -8532 f— Mod: mfroQalfra.oam Client Land Holding Group White Bear Lake, MN Project 12th Avenue and Holly Drive Lino fakes, MN Sheet Title Traffic Control & Detail Sheet Sheet Revision MFRA FILE NO : 13306 VAR. •'71—'41' C e •- 1 /2 " lo O /FT.. NO WOOD STALL BE USED FOR ORATING CASTING; CEMENT MORTAR OILY. CAST IRON WNNOLE FRAME 40 COVER AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. MANHOLE STEPS SAKI. BE CAST IRON, AWWMIM OR STEEL REINFORCED PLASTIC PER A4M 0474 LOCATION SHALL BE AS NOTED N TIE SPECIFICATIONS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS 40 EASE SLAB PER A5N 6470. FURNISH PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS WHIN O-RING GASKETS a LUBRICANT EXCEPT AS 0I14ERW5E SPECIFIED. A T2. 00 le 00IREL SECTION SHALL DE INSTALLED UNDER 774E CONE N/IENEVTR POSSIBLE FILL OPENING BETWEEN PIPE 11 MN WALL METH CEMENT MORTAR. INSIDE SURFACE SHALL BE MESHED 114001H. STORM SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 409 NO SCALE REMOVE CURB BOX BOLTS RINGS (3 MIN.. 1.0' MAY. OF RINGS AND MORTAR). 1/2• MORTAR ON OUTSIDE BETWEEN RINGS. CASTING & MANHOLE FINISH 27• SMOOTH 040 INSIDE NO MORTAR ON INSIDE CEMENT MORTAR -Y i I I I .�.,+m3AAi iii r- - E NO WOOD SHALL BE USED FUR ADJUSTING CASTING: CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST ANON CATCH BASIN FRAME a COVEN CASTINGS PER SPECIFICATIONS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE CONE SECTION R PRECAST 815E PR ASV C470. FILL OPENING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE WALL WON CEMENT MORTAR NSIOE SURFACE 448. BE FANGED 541007K • 1144.441 PIPE COVER CAN 56 REDUCED FROM 4' TO 74 -0" WITH INSTALLATION OF PERFORATED PIPE ORAIN PER "GRANULAR SUBCU= MO PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN. OCTAL CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 NO SCALE "IN1- 5HIE1.0" SEN- OR EQLAN... 2 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIOE, BETWEEN RIGS, CASTING lc MANHOLE. FINISH SMOOTH ON INSIDE NO MORTAR ON INSIDE RINGS (3 MIN., 1.0' MAX. OF RINGS to MORTAR). 3 A 3 48" CEMENT MORTAR SECTION A —A 6' PRECAST BASE SLAB ELEVATION 80 W000 401E BE USED FOR ADJUSTING 243174 R CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST WON MANHOLE FRAME de COVER AS PER SPWOICA90NS. WNHO1 STE♦PP5 SHALL BE CAST IRON, 4NNINW OR STEEL RONFURCE0 PLASTIC PER 4VNH ES Ci0' LOCATION 140OSA IC RE AS NOTED 141E SPECIF5 @KOLAS. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE WNN01E 5685085 51 BASE ore PER AS114 0470. 44041410 PRECAST M•NNNE SECTIONS WON 0-848 GASKETS k LU4RIGWT O8CEPT AS 01494006E SPECIFIED. A 12. 08 19• WM. SECTION SHALL DE. N5TALIID UNDER 174E CONE 8ONOIED POS400P ELL OPENING SEMEN PIPE 8 NM WALL WIN CEMENT MORTAR RACE SAME SHALL BE 4•600 54400144. STORM SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 407 NO SCALE (PIPES 27" OR LESS) 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIDE, BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING k CATCH BASIN. FINISH SMOOTH ON INSIDE. NO MORTAR ON 1NS10E. REMOVE CURB BOX BOLTS RINGS (3 MIN., 1.0' MAX. OF RINGS 8 MORTAR), vAR. (4' MIN.) VARIABLE 1NF1- SHIELD" SEAL OR EQUAL PRECAST DOVER SLAB (TYPE 2) PLACE 2 STRIPS BITUMA2TIC SEAL ON SLAB JOINTS. /-- CEMENT MORTAR PRECAST BASE 1,01 DNA. SLAB THICKNESS 48" 8• 54" -192" 108 8" 10' 120" 12" NO 8000 SMALL RE U5E0 FOR 0000 740 CASTING: CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST BON FRAME 18 ORATE Gomm. PER SPECIFICATIONS. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON. AUMINNA OR STEEL REINFORCED PLASTIC PER A5TM C476 LOCATION SHALL BE AS 1401E0 IN THE 5PECWCARON5, PRECAST RE0NFLWCED CONCPEIE BASE SLAB 18 COVER SI.H8 PER A5711 CAM. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCAEIE N04110LE seapor40 PER AS1M 0478, OR B "- CONCRETE 008801E 8.001 WN I/O" MORTARED OTTEAIOR. NRNIS1 PRECAST CONCRETE AMNNOLE SECTIONS WEI O-RING CASKETS 44 00016CAT? FSIOEPr AS onLERW15E 5P20727, ETU. OPENING BETWEEN PIPE ANC WNNOLE WALL WIN CEMENT MORTAR. RACE SURFACE SHALL R FINISHED SMOOTH. • 4N4AU44 PIPE COVER CAN BE REDUCED FROM 4' TO 2' -5' WITH INSTALLATION OF PERFORATED PIPE CRAN PER 'GRANULAR 4NBCLn ANC, PERFORATED PIPE ORNN' DEG& CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE, TYPE 406 NO SCALE ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE NO SCALE NOTE THE ROCK ENTRANCES 51AU_ 8E INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START O; ANY 511E WORK THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED FI LL0ri1NG EACH RAINFALL. MAINTENANCE OF THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL INCLUDE A TOP 04600NG OF NEW GRAVEL. OR REMOVAL AM REPLACEMENT OF 110E GRAVEL AS NEEDED, TO KEEP THE ENTRANCE FREE FROM COLLECIFD MUD. B =UL. 5' METAL OR 2'42"w000 FENCE POST CEOTECILE WITH NET BACKING BACKP11L CM/TEXTILE TO OVERLAP THROUGH TRENCH. NOTE ; -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO 448001 3880, T7PE 8. - FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS OR AS DIRECTED 81 ENGINEER. r SILT FENCE 740 SCALE ROAD CLOSED LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY R11 -3 60"= 30" REFER T9 ADVANCED ROAD CLOSED SIGN FOR POST REQUIREMENTS (PROVIDE 2 POSTS) LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY SIGN NO SCALE • (2) - (2) • (2) LEGEND "ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED AHEAD" SIGN "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY" SIGN TYPE III BARRICADE 140.1" CT E m IRJ ASH ST TRAFFIC CONTROL MAP NO SCALE NOTES: 1. FURNISH AND PLACE ADDITIONAL BARRICADES, TRAFFIC CONES, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. (INCIDENTAL) 2. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE "MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" (MMUTCD), INCLUDING APPENDIX "8" DATED NOV. 1992, OR MOST CURRENT .UPDATE. 3. DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND WATER SERVICE LINE ON 12TH AVE., HOLLY DR. MUST REMAIN OPEN TO LOCAL TRAFFIC. 4. DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE SEWER, WATERMAIN AND SERVICES ON HOLLY DR., 12TH AVE. MUST REMAIN OPEN TO LOCAL TRAFFIC. 5. THE ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE ROAD BEING CLOSED. THE CLOSURE SIGNS MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL DATES OF THE CLOSURE INDICATED ON THE SIGN. THE CONTRACTOR CAN PROVIDE ANOTHER SIGN WITH JUST THE DATES BUT THE DATES MUST BE ATTACHED WITH THE ROAD CLOSED SIGNS. l/r = 8" GALVANIZED BOLTS NTH CUT WASHERS (CARRIAGE HEX OR 50.) 4 25 45/11 FANGED CHANNEL 115 9(34 POST (MOOT 3401) 12' OVERLAP - 4N01CR 70114 (2) 5/16.0 I' Ban 041H WA5HE85 AND LOCK NUTS 3.0 15 /11 FLANGED CHANNEL BON POST (MOOT 3401) ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED SIGN NO SCALE 7 r worriammi II►�A+ NOMINAL 1'06'08' Na 1 26440E LIN860 1 TREATED O I I t ors _—J I U' "X4'%8 u N0. 4 2 GRAL>E LJ LUMBER OR BETTER QA.TERNAI74 MATERIALS FOR POSTS MAY BE USED WEN APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. NOTE£ 401E BARRICADE 80AR0 FACE SURFACES SHELL BE FULLY RERECTORIZEO ALTERNATE SILVER -NHITE AND RED 0171736, 051NG REFLECTIVE 5HEERNG CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF MNOOT TEC 33522A25, STANDARD N0. 2 EXISTING GROUND T -I/2" 7_ • s TYPE III BARRICADE NO SCALE VE D AUG 0 2' 2001 LINO LAKES 'i Revisions No. Dote By Remarks I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name Date Registration Number Jeff Elliott 6 /11 /01 19174 Scale SHOWN Designed R,E Drawn JHB Dote 6/11/01 Checked Approved Engineering • Planning • Surveying 15050 23rd Avenue North • Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 phone 763/476 -6010 • fox 763/476 -8532 f— Mod: mfroQalfra.oam Client Land Holding Group White Bear Lake, MN Project 12th Avenue and Holly Drive Lino fakes, MN Sheet Title Traffic Control & Detail Sheet Sheet Revision MFRA FILE NO : 13306 al 9NFi— SHIELD' SEAL OR EQUAL 1/2' MORTAR ON OUTSIDE BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING & AND MANHOLE FINISH SMOOTH ON THE INSIDE NO MORTAR ON INSIDE. MANHOLE SLEEVE SEE DETAIL SANITARY SEWER OUTSIDE DROP RINGS (3 MAX., 1' MAX OF RINGS & MORTAR). 48" SECTION A -A 8 a MIN S STE STEEL AL STRAP PLAN 10 MIN. 2 FLEXIBLE SLEEVE MANHOLE SLEEVE NO 0000 SMALL BE USED FOR ADJUSTING CASTINO; CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST 505 MNYOLE FRAME d CDYq AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. MANHOLE STEPS SNAIL BE CAST IRON, ALUMINUM OR 5IFE1. REINFORCED PLASTIC. PER AS1M 0470 STEP LOCATION SHALL BE AS NOTED N THE SPECIFICATIONS. • MANMgFS 20' DEEP AND OWN TO BE CONSTRUCTED wmawT STEPS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANNGLE SECTIONS PER AMU C47B, NRN0SNED 'MIN 0 -0440 CASKETS ANO LUBRICANT 0000'r AS OTHERWISE 550)0102. A 12' CR 19' SARRE. 5EC10N SW.. 8E INSTALLED 05000 THE CONE WXENEVTR P05SIBLE PIPE CONNECDONS TO LLAM101F 58814, 60 MADE WATER TIGHT BY CAST NPIACE RUBBER 5007 MO CEMENT MORTAR. INSIDE SURFACE S88L. 8E NNSNEO SM000L SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 301 NO SCALE (PIPES 27* OR LESS) A HAY BALES OFFSET IN THE CENTER 1 2F m PLAN VIE*( 9 mMEM a aRE NO MUD ICA 8. HAY SALES END TO ENO /i • Mtn SUM Nan he UM. BAWD , mOq,.10711 DWI POW , PLAN VIEW KW C. SILT FENCE WITH ROCK DIVERSION 1.0•3111 MOUND Ww ,Zr.a 9aA wr PM M, r 1311q. , a r Naa +- ` 4,0• au. KIX r 0173. nPN Pan 1. PLAN VIEW SPACING FOR ALL DITCH BLOCKS: 01C`X'RADE SPADING 2 4 100 75 5 8 50 40 04 2s 15I SERVICE I tit. WYE A4 11 • . -11 " "- -I1 -11 11, 11 41 SERVICE SLOPE X11)1` WYE i111111' I111BRI, IL • III, .•. • 9. BAI E DETAIL DITCH BLOCKING NO SCALE 2" x 2" HARDWOOD MARKER W /5P)KE City Plate ERO -6 COMPACTED SAND OR PIT RUN GRANULAR MATERIAL • COMPACTED BACKFILL GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING SAND OR PIT RUN GRANULAR BEDDING ANO ENCASEMENT MATERIAL 0.0. +2' 0.0. 2E111 22 1- 0.0/2 0.0/4 (4' MIN) GRANULAR MATERIAL ENCASEMENT ATM 02321 EMBEDMENT MATERIAL (SEE SPEC.) PIPE INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0 2321, TABLE 2. • EMBEDMENT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTAI 02321. TABLE 1. e —6' METAL FENCE POST MARKER PAINTED GREEN DEPTHS GREATER THAN 14' WHERE RISER APPROVED BY ENGINEER. GRANULAR BEDDING 45' BEND MATERIAL (COMPACTED) WITHOUT RISER 2' x 2" HARDWOOD MARKER 1V/SPIKE AIR11CHT PLUG OR CAP 6' METAL FENCE POST MARKER PAINTED GREEN i -i` 1 aril.. •r1I111f MAX. 45' AIRTIGHT PLUG OR CAP 45' BEND 01ANI1LA14 REDOING MATERIAL (COMPACTED) SERVICE WYE TO BE EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE NOTE SERVICE PIPE TO BE PVC, SCH. 40 (ASTLI 0- 2665). SOLVENT WELD ALL JOINTS • SANITARY SEWER SERVICE NO SCALE GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING METHOD NO SCALE (FOR PVC PIPE) WATE0MNN 512E VARIES COVER AS SPECIFIED CURB 1/2 0.0. EARTH FOUNDATION PIPE FOUNDATION DETAILS NO SCALE GATE VALVE BOX GATE VALVE. 1 1/2' WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND. MI14.1/3 C.Y. (MIN. 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS SOILS) 6'%8"x16" CONC. BLOCK 110 RODS MNOOT 3733 TYPE 3 �GEOTE3TILE FABRIC MIN. 1 LAYER ATTACH TO TOP OF BONNET GATE VALVE INSTALLATION NO SCALE PROPOSED OR D251040 ROAOWAT 5' STEEL FENCE POST PAANIEG BLUE 1' MAX 8• MIN COVER COIDt AS SPECIFIED 512E LENGTH, AN0 TPE OF MA110NAL FOR soma UNE AS SPECBIED \--rARPORA000 SNP' XOR■0NTAL 1005 WATER SERVICE DETAIL NO SCALE CURB 809 e' LON0 AT SAL CAEN50N S. TAR. WITH CRIMPED ENO `SUPPORT CURB 800 WITH 0011C BLOC% 3/4" GALVANIZED STEEL TI0 R005 OR "MEGA LUG' 8RAN0 THRUST RETAINER GLANDS AT JOINTS SEE STD. DWG. 203 CONCRETE CRADLE PIPE BEDDING DETAILS NO SCALE WELD CONDUCTIVITY 011.111 2" BELOW FLANGE (FOR LOCATION CEOTEXTILE FABRIC MNDOT 3733 TYPE 3 CONCRETE BLOCK REACTION BACKING 8"X8'216' CONCRETE BLOCK TYPICAL HYDRANT LAYOUT NO SCALE (VALVE IN BOULEVARD) 1 1/2" WASHED ROCK ALL .4ROUNQ MIN. 1/3 C.Y. (MIN. 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS SOILS.) Revisions No. Date By Remarks I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Name Jeff Elliott Date 6/11/01 Registration Number 19174. Scale SHOWN Designed RJE Drown JHB Date 6/11/01 Checked Approved Engineering • Planning • Surveying 15050 23rd Avenue North • Plymouth, Minneso)0• 55447 phone 763/476 -5010 • fox 763/476 -8532 E —Mod• mfrailmfra,com Client Land Holding Group White Bear Lake, MN Project i Gu�i 12th Aver ue..andr�,F- Limo t Holly Lino lakes, MN E. .001 Sh et Title .c" ES COMPACTED BACKFILL (IN CORROSIVE SOILS USE GRANULAR ENCASEMENT) 1 1 /2"CRUSHED ROCK OR WASHED ROCK DEPTH AS NEEDED TO STABILIZE TRENCH MW. 0.0./4 BUT NOT LESS THAN 10 ". SPECIAL FOUNDATION FOR STABILIZING OR DEWATERING OF TRENCH NO SCALE 0 PLAN 40 MIN. UNDISTURBED SOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL PLAN SECTION NOTE COVER FITTINGS WITH POLYETHYLENE (4441L) PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE 2500 5.0.1. CONCRETE 28 DAY STRENGTH CONCRETE REACTION BACKING NO SCALE (FOR TEES AND CROSSES) 0 NOTE: COVER FITTINGS WITH PLASTIC (4 MIL) PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE UNDISTURBED SOIL SECTION UNDISTURBED SOIL ,115" MIN 2500 PSI CONCRETE 28 DAY STRENGTH CONCRETE REACTION BACKING 140 SCALE (FOR BENDS) 5 MIN. tail Sheet Sheet 7/7 Revision MFRA FILE NO : 13306 • AGENDA ITEM 7 E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Second Reading: Ordinance 13 -01, Rezoning Second Reading: Ordinance 12 -01, MUSA Allocation West Shadow Ponds ACTION: 4/5 vote on each of the ordinances BACKGROUND The City Council approved the first readings of Ordinances 13 -01 and 12 -01 on August 13. This is the second reading. After approval of the second reading, the City will publish the ordinances. The ordinances will become effective 30 days after publication. The City Council also approved the West Shadow Ponds preliminary plat on August 13 • with Resolution 01 -113. One of the conditions of that approval was the initiation of a feasibility study for the reconstruction of 62nd St. and 12 Ave./Holly Drive. Those feasibility studies are to be presented by the City Engineer as items 7. I. and 7.J. on tonight's agenda. OPTIONS 1. Approve second reading of Ordinance 13 -01, approving the rezoning from Rural to R -1X. 2. Approve second reading of Ordinance 12 -01, approving the allocation of 11 acres of MUSA reserve. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Options 1 and 2 • • 13 -01 Council Member • • introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 13-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R RURAL TO R -1X SINGLE FAMILY EXECUTIVE FOR WEST SHADOW PONDS The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. 1.E. of the Lino Lakes zoning ordinance: 1. The proposed rezoning action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the 2001 City Comprehensive Plan, which guides the site for low density sewered residential uses in a Stage 1 growth area. 2. The proposed use will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is guided for low density sewered residential uses. Land north and east of the site is already developed with single family homes. Parkland to the west will remain. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The accompanying plat proposal meets the zoning and platting requirements contained in City ordinances. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with the extension of existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property, and planned road improvements will allow for the implementation of the City's transportation plan in the area. Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on January 10, 2001. • • • Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on July 14, 1997 is hereby amended by rezoning from R, Rural, to R -1X, Single Family Executive, the following described real estate: (see attached) Section 4. As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. S 12-01 Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 12-01 • • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY ALLOCATING 11 ACRES OF MUSA RESERVE TO THE WEST SHADOW PONDS DEVELOPMENT The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does hereby ordain: Section 1. The City Council finds that the proposed project meets the City's Interim MUSA Reserve Criteria as follows: 1. The request for MUSA is occurring concurrently with preliminary plat application. 2. The rezoning request is occurring concurrently with the MUSA request. 3. MUSA is adjacent to the north border of the site. 4. The net acreage for the project is 11 acres, and that is the MUSA request. 5. Utilities exist directly adjacent to the site. 6. West Shadow Lake Drive is planned as a minor collector road. The extension of West Shadow Lake Drive through the site is consistent with the City's transportation plan. 7. The City has reviewed the proposal and determined it will not adversely affect the community health, welfare, or general safety. 8. The City has reviewed the proposal and determined that impacts to the environment are mitigated by the wetland plan approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Large wetland areas will be retained, and new replacement wetlands will be created for a net increase in wetlands. 9. The existing City park adjacent to the development was dedicated in part in anticipation of the park dedication requirements of this development. The park location is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Park Plan. 10. The site is within Sewer District No.1 which is consistent with the MUSA reserve agreement with the Metropolitan Council. • 11. Utilities exist directly adjacent to the site and extension to this site is consistent with the City's sewer and water plan. 12. The developer has demonstrated a significant commitment to the community by way of previous development projects. 13. The proposed development complies with the City's Infill Policy outlined by Resolution No. 92 -85, because: allocation of MUSA reserve will put the site within the MUSA; the development of the site has been analyzed for impacts on utility and street system costs; the analysis determined that costs will be covered, that operation and maintenance will not exceed normal costs, and there will be no additional costs. 14. When improved according to the recommended plans, West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd St. will be adequate to handle traffic. Section 2. A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on November 12, 1998. Section 3. Since the findings support the proposal, 11 acres of interim MUSA reserve shall be allocated to the area included in the West Shadow Ponds development. • Section 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared passed and adopted. • • • • AGENDA ITEM 7F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Final Plat Spirit Hills ACTION REQUESTED: 3/5 vote Verbal update to be given at work session. Staff report pending. • • • AGENDA ITEM 7 F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution 01 -121: Final Plat, Spirit Hills ACTION: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The City Council approved the preliminary plat on June 11 with Resolution 01 -79. The developer has submitted a final plat for approval. The City typically requires a number of things for a final plat approval. These include: • Final plat must substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat. • Development agreement must be completed, including financial securities. • Title must be reviewed by City Attorney. • Conditions of approval must be met. The final plat conforms to the preliminary plat. We have a development agreement. The title has been reviewed by the City Attorney. In addition to the standard conditions, the approval required landscaping/ along the east side of the new Ware Rd. extension and provision of an area for a lift station. Outlot B will be deeded to the City for the lift station. Screening/landscaping along the new road will be included in the project. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 01 -121 approving the final plat of Spirit Hills. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • 01 -121 Council Member adoption. introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-121 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR SPIRIT HILLS WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a final plat, and WHEREAS, review and approvals of plats are governed by state statutes and City ordinances, and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat for Spirit Hills was approved with Resolution 01 -79 by the City Council on June 11, 2001, and WHEREAS, Outlot B will be deeded to the City for the location of a lift station to serve the project, and • WHEREAS, screening of neighboring properties along Outlot B will be included in the • project, and WHEREAS, the final plat for Spirit Hills complies with City requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the final plat for Spirit Hills. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Dahl and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • • z 0 SPIRIT HIILS 7 20 J ..„0„ J S83'23•I4.E 65 60.00 i N 58t '6 h 8516 21 21 oP ,9 � 0 . s \W =J • ° 'SAND 1 �\ z2 f T ....-k., ,\P 24 , 25 '., \ ` 66 g1 23 1 \N 86'5]'24 E aSq -je Lti 30 8 ssi 8°' • Z i1 N1�3j 20 ` „.98.20.37' 6t , Q *,ey.1198 Sala LIN .l Ma. Lao. (863.4) 1 ul o OM ', U U `off 53.58 5 88'.1'11' E / 5oat4 Line ..- C.rt Lot 5 9 y v '66.37 v).1) J . s... 5 68'0'3',' E N' y 8 N' L -]5.66 8.6'39•25 Ordinary Ixvn Sato LM of 4)k• L6. (883.1) A SIOUX N 8131.65• W "COURT. bey„ 7 x y ..72.55 S 83) 58 E 201.0 s L -19.35 , 9.12.51.08' 13 ::: FF.ir 4, v N.. W 4 W W v DOJ/ `Y W v 98 J v Y W 4' `984, 5 40'40'47' E,;. 4 -Y 4' 4, 4, 4 4, N: •Y v 0 t� ,Y v N: .. O V J- ., Y \ 1 , ''��1J�� r 'Y •4 W v 0 -Y / 8- 183.00 r 1.118 2J .� 'V •Y , W •Y 6 .�.'1, 5i N, ' ,.L N' WARE 9-42.15'58 L- 331.96 �x^� 8.65'4,17• \ 4 v 6 65'42 5 8533'07 E 86 y a z w - o-61f5f -. N 85'5]'0)' W �7 4, 18 3 E 00 of r0 .26'5010'J' fl L- 28.10 - I) 71 4' \ 72 - 628.54 - -- 58915'02"E •Y r i V N / y iN. V v / :,:Y ' y 7A1 2q g Y `.1 - Y • - -Conte tin. STATE NWY N0. 49 OUTLOT A 0 rn rn CD poi 467.68 A AInl: A r•n. MIT,/ 533.68 _ nr ft ^. o n v1.n '.vv.r 5 N88.22'50 "W rivfl 1 -vi - i a V ', ../'---- Con ter lin. a;.,1, e• i_, CE I IV, [jl L In 16 33.00 ( 3].00 8 I, } • • • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE: AGENDA ITEM 7G Michael Grochala 8/27/01 TOPIC: Consideration of Classification of Tax Forfeited Property VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: Anoka County has notified the city that a parcel of property in Lino Lakes has forfeited to the State of Minnesota because of delinquent taxes. If the parcel is not repurchased within six months, the city can choose to obtain title to it for public use. Otherwise the parcel will be sold at a county auction. This parcel is .77 acres on Lake Drive, just south of James Street. Staff has not identified any specific need for this property for public use. Since it has future potential for commercial development, staff is recommending that the city council find that this parcel is not needed for a public use so that it can remain on the tax rolls, and approve the classification and sale of this property. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the classification and sale of the tax forfeited parcel 2. Obtain the parcel for public use after the repurchase period is over 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 JE -- 55781-- SOQ°0957"W--- •e. rr P404ID04/s k 3M • :■� 1 I a w-. /./0.4f5"; OE tk o `• o team 0 ,vo.I6 oe G /Pa 7 4.4 O, -4 i/0 45 00 : I /ea 'a 0 AGENDA ITEM 7H • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -122, Joint Powers Agreement with Shoreview for Water Service. VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required Staff expects to receive the final version of the Joint Powers Agreement from Shoreview on Friday. The staff report will be prepared and submitted with the "Friday update ". • • AGENDA ITEM 71 STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 - 123, Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the 62nd Street Reconstruction. VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: On August 13, 2001, the City Council considered the West Shadow Ponds subdivision. Based on City staff's review of the draft minutes from the meeting, a condition of the preliminary plat approval was initiation of a feasibility study for the reconstruction of 62nd Street. The study will consider sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer issues; wetland impacts; road section and other matters related to reconstructing the streets. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the Lino Lakes Charter, Council is required to order the preparation of a report studying the proposed improvements. • OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -123, Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the 62nd Street Reconstruction. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 01 -123 be adopted. • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01-123 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF STUDY FOR THE 62ND STREET RECONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve 62 "d Street from Ware Road to Red Maple Lane by reconstructing the street, constructing curb and gutter, sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer and, WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefitted property for the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 27, 2001. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 7J • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer • • COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 - 124, Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the 12th Avenue /Holly Drive Reconstruction. VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: On August 13, 2001, the City Council considered the West Shadow Ponds subdivision. Based on City staff's review of the draft minutes from the meeting, a condition of the preliminary plat approval was initiation of a feasibility study for the reconstruction of 12th Avenue and Holly Drive. The study will consider sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer issues; wetland impacts; road section and other matters related to reconstructing the streets. A study of this road from County Road J (Ash Street) to CSAH 10 (Birch Sreet) was also prepared in 1995. As much information and data as is possible will be utilized from the previous study. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the Lino Lakes Charter, Council is required to order the preparation of a report studying the proposed improvements. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 01 -124, Ordering Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the 12th Avenue /Holly Drive Reconstruction. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 01 -124 be adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -124 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF STUDY FOR THE 12" AVENUE/HOLLY DRIVE STREET RECONSTRUCTION. WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve 12th Avenue and Holly Drive from County Road J (Ash Street) to CSAH 10 (Birch Street) to by reconstructing the street, constructing curb and gutter, sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer and, WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefitted property for the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 27, 2001. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • AGENDA ITEM 7K e STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -125, Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract, 2001 Bituminous Wearing Course project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on August 20, 2001. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid North Valley, Inc. W.B. Miller, Inc. $88,530.50 $93,361.45 Engineer's Estimate $99,176.50 The low bid is approximately 11 % below the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy of the complete bid tabulation is attached. The funding for this work is provided by assessments to the respective subdivisions included in the project. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 01 -125, accepting bids and awarding a construction contract to North Valley, Inc. for the 2001 Bituminous Wearing Course project. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 01 -125. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 01 -125. • • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -125 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — 2001 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the 2001 Wearing Course project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor North Valley, Inc. W.B. Miller, Inc. Engineer's Estimate Amount of Bid $88,530.50 $93,361.45 $99,176.50 AND WHEREAS, it appears that North Valley, Inc., is the lowest responsible bidder: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with North Valley, Inc., in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the 2001 Wearing Course Improvements according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted CERTIFICATION 1 hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 27, 2001. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk 0 0 0 000000 000 otntnoo o N O V - �% On N nt CO CO CO to (A to r • O) C) r 0 r EA Ffl EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 888 °8°°88 O N ton N CO r M C�) C) N C7 r EA 69 EA EA EA EA EA 69 69 0 0 0 O O 0 0) N 0 0) 1� • • W Cn CC C1) W 0 < -1 Z0 EE Q J W u- • O • r NU COMMISSION NO. 12356 -01 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 8/20/2001 *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDER'S CALCULATION LLI I- J Q 0 Cn ~Q W Cn W W Z W Z Z 9. W = d H Z H Z 0 DESCRIPTION 0 0 )n 0 0 0 O) 0 0 0 0 0 N O 7 to 4 tf) C) CD to CO 0 r tnrrh� rn C'7r N r) r) r) EA EA EA EA EA (4 EA EA EA 0 t• � Or N M VN' CC') 0 r) r r r r) 0 0 r) (O CO EA EA EA EA EA EA ER EA EA EA EA 008 )00000 O O O O o N O C' O o tn N N N O m O M NZ' I� v r N 6 69 EA EA EA EA EA 69 EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O o 0 0 0 O O to co 0 N K N 0 N T t0 co T 64 EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA O cri cri c) EA • WZ J W W >AU?F W ✓ N N M O 0 T CO D v v _Z -J J W W} CO W Cr ~ Q h- I CO CO� O)°n ton D 00 Z Y N N OU Q U W W Q Cn CO 2 W X H cr Er Q 3 W et D J 00 Z O U O O O J cc LL 7 O O W Q}Z j W J 0- H Q W CC Q W U O<< H W n D 0 N 1- H W W Z Q Z Z W _J cnN0�5 2- co-± 0 w < 1 1 - 0 - 0 tntntn r � N 0 0 N N N to O O O O O tntntntn LC) in 0 • 4 0 • 0 N 6 O_ O_ O_ O_ O o_ N N N N N N J 1— 0 BID TABULATION AGENDA ITEM 7L • STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 27, 2001 TOPIC: Resolution No. 01 -126, Receive Bids and Award Construction Contract, 2001 Surface Water Management Project • • VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on August 21, 2001. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid Forest Lake Contracting $136,491.00 Engineer's Estimate $127,682.50 Only one bid was received for this project. The low bid is approximately 7% above the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy of the bid tabulation is attached. We contacted the contractors who received plans but did not submit bids. The reasons given for not submitting bids include; their estimators were on vacation, they were too busy, and the project contained too much ditch cleaning and not enough pipe installation for their crews. If the project is re -bid next year, the City may have additional bidders but the overall cost of construction will also be increased due to inflation. The net result may not be a lower bid. Also, the sites will likely be wetter next Spring than they will be this Fall. The funding for this work is provided by the Surface Water Management Fund. This fund was established in 1992 as a revenue source in order to meet the "administrative, planning, ponding, mitigation, and water quality needs" of the City. It is reimbursed through assessments to new subdivisions and is also collected as property owners connect to City utilities. The completion date for this project is October 31, 2001. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 01 -126, accepting bids and awarding a construction contract to Forest Lake Contracting for the 2001 Surface Water Management project. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 01 -126. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 01 -126. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -126 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — 2001 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the 2001 Surface Water Management project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Amount of Bid Forest Lake Contracting $136,491.00 Engineer's Estimate $127,682.50 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Forest Lake Contracting, is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Forest Lake Contracting, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the 2001 Surface Water Management Improvements according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of August, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on August 27, 2001. Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk • • • TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON 2001 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS COMMISSION NO. 12327 -01 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 8/21/01 *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDER'S CALCULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 24.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 125.00 $ 250.00 $ 4.00 $ 240.00 0 0 0 rn 0 6' EA $ 4,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 175.00 $ 525.00 $ 60.00 $ 1,980.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 900.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 125.00 $ 750.00 $ 4.00 $ 240.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 750.00 $ 12,245.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 6.00 $ 1,242.00 $ 300.00 $ 600.00 $ 38.00 $ 7,866.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,125.00 $ 250.00 $ 500.00 $ 4.00 $ 400.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 26,283.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 50.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 120.00 $ 240.00 $ 4.00 $ 240.00 $ 21,480.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 300.00 $ 900.00 $ 32.00 $ 1,056.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 800.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 120.00 $ 720.00 $ 4.00 $ 240.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 175.00 0 0 rn r- $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 7.00 $ 1,449.00 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 $ 28.00 $ 5,796.00 $ 750.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 120.00 $ 1,080.00 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 $ 4.00 $ 400.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 525.00 $ 17,550.00 TWILIGHT ACRES 2ND ADD. 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS 2 POND EXCAVATION (EV) 400 CY 3 RIP RAP, CL. III 2 CY 4 SILT FENCE 60 LF SUBTOTAL THOMAS STREET 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS 2 CLEAR & GRUB TREE 3 EA 3 18" RCP, CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 33 LF 4 CONST. STORM MANHOLE, TYPE 407 1 EA 5 18" RCP, FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASH GUARD 2 EA 6 RIP RAP, CL. III 6 CY 7 SILT FENCE 60 LF 8 SEEDING 0.05 AC SUBTOTAL MAR DON ACRES 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS 2 REMOVE 12" CMP & APRONS 207 LF 3 REMOVE CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE 2 EA 4 15" RCP, CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 207 LF 5 15" RCP, FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD 2 EA 6 CONST. CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE MNDOT PLATE 40 2 EA 7 RIP RAP, CL. III 9 CY 8 CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" RCP STORM SEWER PI 2 EA 9 SILT FENCE 100 LF 10 SEEDING 0.15 AC SUBTOTAL BID TABULATION • • • BID TABULATION 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N V O 6 x 0 0 0 0 1!) 0 0 Cn O 0 N 0 0) C^0 N (00 ON O N (00 0 0 0) 0 0 C•) N (1:1,-,-,-- h CO .- . C•) r LO '- 0) 0) (A 694A 49 EA EA EA 44 E9 EA- 4969 EA EA EA 69 $ 1 0 0 0 000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 (0 O ro I- 0 0 0 0 to O to 0) O O O Ch V 0 0 0 to N N ON 0) CO N 0 N CD .- (-6 69690,69696941,69696969696969-66- 0 O o Ln nl 0) Csi CO tO V lV T TO 2001 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS AN CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA EN COMMISSION NO. 12327 -01 TABULATION OF BIDS BIDS OPENED: 8/21/01 *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDER'S CALCULATION ENGINEER'S I ITEM UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE 49 VI CAROLES ESTATES 2ND ADD. 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS 2 CLEAR & GRUB TREE 9 EA 3 REMOVE 15" CMP STORM SEWER PIPE & APRONS 202 LF 4 REMOVE 27" RCP STORM SEWER PIPE & APRON 133 LF 5 REMOVE CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE 1 EA 6 18" RCP, CLASS 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 202 LF 7 27" RCP, CLASS 3 STORM SEWER PIPE 133 LF 8 18" RCP, FLARED END SECTION 2 EA 9 27" RCP, FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASH GUARD 1 EA 10 CONST. CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE MNDOT PLATE 40 1 EA 11 CONNECT TO EXISTING 27" RCP STORM SEWER PI 1 EA 12 RIP RAP, CL. III 15 CY 13 DITCH EXCAVATION (EV) 125 CY 14 POND EXCAVATION (EV) 60 CY 15 SODDING 325 SY SUBTOTAL WEBER ADD. & SHENANDOAH 2ND ADD. 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS 2 CLEAR & GRUB TREE 40 EA 3 COMMON BORROW (P) (LV) 500 CY 4 15" RCP, CLASS 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 175 LF 5 15" RCP, FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASH GUARD 2 EA 6 CONST. STORM MANHOLE TYPE 409 1 EA 7 RIP RAP, CL. III 8 CY 8 DITCH EXCAVATION (EV) 200 CY 9 POND EXCAVATION (EV) 50 CY 10 SILT FENCE 80 LF 11 SODDING 500 SY SUBTOTAL TOTAL BID PROPOSAL BID TABULATION • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES DATE : July 9, 2001 TIME STARTED : 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED : 10:15 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson MEMBERS ABSENT : None Staff members present: City Administrator, Linda Waite Smith; City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; City Engineer, John Powell; City Planner, Jeff Smyser; Public Services Director, Rick DeGardner; Community Development Director, Mike Grochala; Economic Development Director, Brian Wessel (part); Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia (part); and Sergeant Bill Hammeart) SETTING THE AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Dahl moved to approve the Consent enda, as presented. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carr' u° 'mor`" ly. ITEM DISBURSEMENTS: July 9, 2001 (Che N 62396, $291,141. Approved Centennial Fire Dis t Approved ACTION Consideration of Not Waiving Monetary Limits on Tort Liability Per MN Statute 466.04 Approved OPEN MIKE No one was present for open mike. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK There was no Finance Department report. 1 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 • ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH Consider Employee Request for Extended Leave of Absence — City Administrator Waite Smith advised Officer Shawn Silvera and his wife have accepted positions with the Peace Corps in Honduras, and will be departing July 24, 2001. This is a two -(2) year assignment, with the Silvera's returning in the fall of 2003. Officer Silvera has requested the City grant him an unpaid leave of absence in order that he may return to the police department after his Peace Corps assignment. The City Council would have to make an exception to its current leave of absence policy. • • City Administrator advised it is her recommendation and the recommendation of Chief Pecchia that an exception be made to the current policy, and offer twenty -seven month leave of absence to Officer Silvera. Officer Silvera has been an asset to the department, both on the street and behind the scenes with his knowledge of computers and the City's computer network. The expert: e that Officer Silvera will acquire in Honduras, specifically increased knowledge of the Span lan • age, would be of value to Lino Lakes as the community continues to diversify. As this is not a single incumbent position, the plan would e Mac •fficer Silvera when he leaves this summer. The department would reincorporate hi ,bac , into department when he returns, given a vacancy exists in 2003. It is assumed that co r[ owth of the community would merit at least one new officer that year Shawn understa ever, ere are no guarantees. Council Member O'Donnell moved to agre leave of absence, as presented. Council unanimously. ilvera's request for a twenty seven -month Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTM PORT, DAVE PECCHIA Quad Cities Police Forc Propo — Chief Pecchia presented the Quad Cities Police Force Proposal in detail noting Council di requested regarding the continuing or discontinuing of the research of a Joint Law En ce ent Proposal. Chief Pecchia noted there is a meeting in July with the Mayors and City Administrators of the four - (4) cities. He asked that if Council Members have any questions about the proposal please let him know so the questions can be addressed at that meeting. Mayor Bergeson stated some time should be set aside at a Council work session for detailed questions about the proposal. Staff is only asking now for direction on whether or not the research should continue. Council Member Carlson stated she would like to hear from the Finance Director about the proposal. She referred to the Comprehensive Plan regarding pursuing joint ventures to reduce costs and stated she believes this is an opportunity for the City and she is supportive of pursuing. She added she hopes that the City will benefit in the same way as it did from the Centennial Fire Department. 2 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 Council Member Dahl moved to continue researching the Joint Law Enforcement proposal, as presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Mayor Bergeson advised one of the items that was discussed with the cities' Mayors was the funding formula. The other cities do feel that all the cities will share in the savings in some way. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER Consideration of Resolution No. 01— 90, Authorizing Condemnation of 6993 Black Duck Drive and 6998 Black Duck Drive for Public Trail — Public Services Director DeGardner advised for the past several years, the City of Lino Lakes has been attempting to place a public trail at the north end of Reshanau Lake. At the April 9, 2001 City Council meeting, the City Council approved the purchase agreements to acquire the necessary land located at 6993 Blau yuck Drive and 6998 Black Duck Drive. In June, 2001, staff was informed by one of the property owns t th o ortgage lenders of his property require a complex, time consumin g, and ex ensiy p authorize the sale of the land to the City. Subsequently, both property owners are re • ues g t ity initiate a "friendly" condemnation process to acquire the land described i chase agreements. Therefore, staff is recommending the City Cou 1 dire the City Attorney to begin condemnation proceedings to acquire the necessary land a . • 9 ac ) uck Dive and 6998 Black Duck Drive as previously agreed with the property ow 1 components of the purchase agreements will remain in effect. Council Member O'Donnell in Director DeGardner stated th'�. = ss f condemnation takes 120 days. Construction won't take place until the process is omplet ut a timeline if this item moves forward. Public Services Council Member O'Donne•sk 'd if the City will lose the $30,000. DNR grant money. Public Services Director DeGardne tated the funds have to be spent by April 15, 2002. He indicated he hopes the City will be allowed on the residents' property before the 120 days is up. Mayor Bergeson asked if the 90 days can be waived if the process is a friendly one. The City Attorney advised 90 days is the minimum time for the City to take possession of the property unless the property owners allow the City to be on their property. Council Member Carlson thanked Mr. DeGardner for his work on obtaining the $125,000. grant for Clearwater Creek. Mayor Bergeson asked if part of the trail is on county property. Public Services Director DeGardner advised part of the trail is on county property. The funds will be used for the non - county portion. 3 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 Council Member Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 01 — 90, as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 01 — 90 can be found in the City Clerk's office. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT Saddle Club, Heritage Development, FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 10 — 01, Rezoning (4/5 Vote Required); FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 09 — 01, Comprehensive Plan Amendment for MUSA Reserve Allocation (4/5 Vote Required); Resolution No. 01— 77, Preliminary Plat (3/5 Vote Required), Jeff Smyser — City Planner Smyser advised this application was originally scheduled for the June 11 City Council meeting, then the applicant agreed to postpone it to the June 25 meeting. At the June 25 meeting, the City Council tabled it, with the applicant's agreement, to the July 9 meeting. Members of the Council listed a number of issues for which they requested more information. These issues were listed in the letter to Heritage Develo ,� ;mot on June 27 (copies were forwarded to the City Council). City Planner Smyser presented the staff analysis of the issue une 25 City Council meeting including clarification of the Environmental Bo re %nme ation and the park dedication breakdown. He also noted the original staff analysis o the lk, .pli n was given at the June 25 City Council meeting. Council Member Carlson asked what designate advised when the original reserve was crea how it could be used such as specific lo eserve refers to. City Planner Smyser e Metropolitan Council laid out criteria on This site is in a designated location. Council Member Carlson inquired.a west as compared to the north. have a net positive impact on deficit to the trunk funds. The Ci from the north. This is ba plat. utility charges if the City brings the utilities in the neer Powell advised that utilities brought from the west will nk ds. Utilities brought from the north would result in a net uld have to find an outside funding source if utilities come truck sanitary sewer and water charges generated by the proposed Council Member Carlson asked about the City responsibility regarding the payment of the road construction and sewer and water. City Engineer Powell advised the recommendation as is indicates the watermain loop will be paid by the developer. The sanitary sewer extension will be a City cost. The street reconstruction costs will be split 50/50 between the City and the developer. Trunk funds will more than cover that if utilities come from the west. Council Member O'Donnell referred to the public notices that were sent out and what the plat indicated at that time. He asked if there were two (2) different plats with one showing a connection at Kildeer and one that did not show the connection. He stated another notice was sent to the residents but a plat was not included. He stated residents may have been confused or felt deceived. He stated he agrees there needs to be a second access if the project goes through. He noted it is important that all residents got all of the information. 4 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 City Planner Smyser stated the City always has to deal with the question of how much notification is sufficient. It is not possible to have enough notification. The second plat was received far too late to get to residents before the meeting. Also, staff did not bring a full recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board meeting and recommended the hearing be continued. He noted that plats are not always sent out with notices and the City was short two (2) staff members at that time. State law requires a public hearing but copies of the plat do not have to be sent out. Council Member O'Donnell inquired about the length of the proposed cul -de -sac. City Planner Smyser advised the cul -de -sac would be longer than the City's maximum cul -de -sac length. Staff feels public safety will be served if a cul -de -sac is developed, however, a cul -de -sac is not necessary. City Engineer Powell stated another option is to put a cul -de -sac at the north end and also midway on the road. Mayor Bergeson advised a public hearing was held on May 9, 200 ,`" owl rter, the Council will take brief comments. Mr. Don Dunn, 6885 Black Duck Drive, came forward an oes not live in this area but his children's children do. He stated he knows the area very w g 1 an. : is to keep the children out of harm's way. The project puts the children in the are s way. He stated he could not believe it when he saw an access at Kildeer as he thought t e . ' taken care of He asked why residents would attend a meeting when no access was shown e data$ as available and staff was aware of the change. He stated he does not agree that th , n • s o ° act have been met and there is no written documentation supporting any of them. rre• o traffic issues and stated a traffic impact study was not performed for this project. fair to expose the residents without a traffic study. Staff did indicate they wer _ t .lm_ stimates of traffic but have not distributed them. He stated he spoke with Chair Sch. Planning and Zoning Board and he indicated the reasons for denial are in the report. The = . . are the report and the Planning and Zoning Board did not feel the project is worth the USA. r could be a better project that will need MUSA and has less issues surrounding it He . '® : < project needs to be tabled and go back to the drawing board. Residents need to be in on = p1 ning process. He added there are many places in the City that have only one access. He stated f does not think the residents would be opposed to an emergency gate. The Council needs to consider all the issues and the Council does have enough concerns to deny this project. Mr. Mike Prieve, 1047 Aspen Lane, distributed a copy of a petition that was signed by most of the residents in the neighborhood. He stated the biggest problem is residents feel that they were misled. The plat originally showed no connection at Killdeer so residents did not attend the meetings to discuss other options. He stated his subdivision has 90 homes that are using two (2) accesses and a proper way to shift the traffic pattern is needed. He stated his neighborhood can not handle any additional traffic. Screening may not be needed if there is no second access. The residents feel very cheated and misled. He asked for a no vote and indicated residents want to be more involved. 5 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 • Mr. Dave Eric, 6527 Pheasant Run South, stated there is no park area in the plat. All the traffic will come down Aspen to get to the park. He stated he did not receive any notices relating to the project. There is not adequate parking now for the park. He stated he hopes the Council will consider those issues and indicated he also feels cheated by not being involved. • • Mr. Greg Graves, 6532 Killdeer Drive, stated he has lived in his home for 12 years and likes living there. He and his wife have helped pay for schools and roads in the City. He stated he also feels cheated that the City is going to vote on something that will radically change his lifestyle. Traffic and speed are major concerns. He indicated he believes the curve in the roadway will be an eyesore and dangerous. Children will be in jeopardy as well as personal property. He stated residents do not feel they have been at all considered in this project with only a 2 -3 week notice. He begged the Council to deny the application. Ms. Janell Dillartine, 6527 Pheasant Run South, stated the biggest complaint in the neighborhood now is the speed and traffic for park activities. Traffic is a major issu- 4 .•ng with the additional pressure that will be put on the neighborhood as a whole. Mr. Steve Schmidt, 998 Aspen Lane, thanked the Council Mernbe th. turned his calls. He noted that Mayor Bergeson did not return his call and referred to J arti relating to comments Mayor Bergeson had made about government. He stated his 1 t is dou •° rontage lot and he expressed concern about having a roadway on two (2) sides of h • ` e stated he is also concerned about the traffic and doesn't feel that the project is planne•.' - e sta ed he does not want asphalt on three (3) sides of his house noting the trail and road uld re ° y„ It in that Safety of the children in the area is also a major concern. Mr. Eric Gamradt, 6503 Killdeer Dri have already been mentioned. He s the reasons extensive screenin Safety is another main issue ares the same concerns with his neighbors that at eening was mentioned but a lot more is needed noting . He indicated the Council should vote no on this project. traffic and the road deterioration due to construction. Mr. Richard Roth, 6550 B residents. He stated a cul- mentioned. By running the Drive South, stated he shares the same concerns as the other sa on Old Birch and running the sewer from the west have been er from the west only one existing resident can be serviced. He added that the public meeting was very poorly run and very little information was given. He urged the Council to deny the project and go back to the drawing board. He suggested a plan that includes only one access with the sewer running from the north end and having a cul -de -sac on Old Birch at the end of the roadway or in the middle. Mayor Bergeson asked staff to review the options regarding a cul -de -sac and the sewer recommendation. City Engineer Powell reviewed the options regarding utilities coming in from the west or the north. He stated the City would not be able to recover its costs if the utilities come from the north. He noted the roads are designed to handle the additional traffic noting the reason for the concept of a cul -de -sac. He advised that traffic studies are not done for every subdivision. From an engineering standpoint, the recommendation includes two (2) accesses. He added that local roadways are designed for 1,000 — 2,000 trips per day. 6 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 • Mayor Bergeson noted the City can not send the plan back to the drawing board unless the applicant requests another extension. • Mr. Craig Kruman, Attorney for Mr. Hill, came forward and reminded the Council of the legal obligations regarding this item. He stated there are only a few outstanding items that relate to Heritage Development and he does not believe a denial will hold up in court. He stated the applicant just received a Quick Claim Deed for the road access to Old Birch. The screening issues need to be referred to an expert. The Planning and Zoning Board denial can not hold up as a reason to deny. The MUSA should not be an issue because there is still MUSA in the bank. He noted MUSA from the bank was just recently allocated to other developments. Mr. John Hill, Heritage Development, stated he is present and will answer any questions. Mayor Bergeson asked if the applicant would like a vote taken this evening. Mr. Hill indicated he would like to proceed this evening with a vot Council Member O'Donnell clarified that at the last Council eetV _, `' ' dicated he was supportive of the MUSA and rezoning because he felt the City previol de .k mistake relating to those issues. He stated he was not supportive of the proposed pla a The City Attorney advised the Council has the obl .• to : low the standards within the ordinances and the decision has to be based on ,.ecificcts. If the action taken is not consistent with current ordinances, specific reasons as to w begtven. Council Member Carlson asked if a • mac`- erri:'er can make a motion and vote no on that motion. The City Attorney advised that is 1 Council Member Carlson mo • .ppr e FIRST READING, Ordinance 10 — 01, as presented. Council Member O'Donnell seco • the motion. Council Member Carlson rrre to the findings of fact and stated they have not been met. She commented on the outstandi . _ issues discussed at the last Council meeting and indicated they have not been addressed either. She requested the Comprehensive Plan of 1987 be reviewed. She also referred to the current Comprehensive Plan relating to utilities, City growth, premature subdivision, orderly development program, design of local and residential roads, and improvement costs for utilities. She stated she does not believe this is a good use of taxpayers' dollars. Mayor Bergeson asked for clarification regarding the conditions of approval that apply to which particular motion. City Engineer Powell reviewed what the City will pay for and what the developer will pay for if the utilities are extended from the west. There will be a net increase to the trunk fund after the City pays its share. The taxpayers as a whole are not paying for utilities. 7 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 Ms. Sherman referred to page 4 of the staff report that findings for the rezoning criteria are outlined if the application is denied. Council Member Carlson stated the application can be denied because it doesn't meet the following criteria: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provision of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 3. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Council Member Carlson called the question. Council Member O'Donnell asked if a rezone to R -1X w co : ' ere City Planner Smyser advised that was not considered because the property is already zon . R- ' he applicant wanted to move the zoning line down. The applicant would have to sub e app ication to rezone to R -1X with a new plat. Council Member O'Donnell voted yea. Co i1\ mb ' Reinert voted no. Council Member Dahl voted no Mayor Bergeson voted yea. t Snc Mem . er Carlson voted no Motion failed with Council Memb- `: ert, : ahl and Carlson voting no. Mayor Bergeson asked if the Attorney advised the Coucil sho may hinge on the first act sh old continue with the other two -(2) actions. The City ote on the other two -(2) items even if the reasons for denial Council Member O'Donnell oved to approve FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 09 — 01, as presented. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Council Member O'Donnell stated he believes that cutting this parcel in half was an error. Mayor Bergeson stated he believes the MUSA request fits the intent of the banked MUSA. The project is an infill project. He stated he does not believe that the City being out of the MUSA reserve is a reason to deny the request. He indicated he will support the MUSA allocation. Council Member Reinert voted no. Council Member Dahl voted no. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Council Member Carlson voted no. Council Member O'Donnell voted yea. Motion failed with Council Members Reinert, Dahl and Carlson voting no. 8 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 Council Member Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 01 — 77, as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Council Member Carlson noted the Planning and Zoning Board was unanimous in their recommendation of denial for this item. The City Attorney advised that based on the zoning ordinance denial, Council Members can not approve the plat. Mayor Bergeson stated he will vote no based on advice from the City Attorney. He stated this is a preliminary plat and issues related to the details of the plan could be addressed before final plat approval. Council Member Carlson indicated she did call Chair Schaps of the Pla two other members of the Board regarding their vote. She referred advised there is the possibility of this item being brought up at t ng and Zoning Board and bert's Rules of Order and it meeting. Motion failed with Council Members Carlson, Dahl, O'De v ne ei art and Mayor Bergeson voting no. Mayor Bergeson called for a short recess at 9:07 Mayor Bergeson reconvened the meeting a Mayor Bergeson asked Council Me e off' ent on their vote of the previous item relating to the findings of fact. Council Member O'Donnell ' . at i he project was approved a cul -de -sac that is against City Ordinance would be created an d i 'onal traffic would be added to an already dangerous outlet at Birch Street. Council Member Reinert staffed he has the same issues as Council Member O'Donnell noting the City Engineer did refer to Old Birch Street as a very dangerous intersection. He stated the project can not house that many units, creating an even more dangerous situation. Council Member Dahl referred to the criteria to deny the application relating to City policies and provisions and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. She stated the City should not pay $90,000 for a development when there is the potential for nine (9) residents to hook up to City utilities sooner or later if they come from the north. The road can not be reconstructed at this time so it would be even more unsafe. Staff needs to look at something to make the roadway safe. She also noted the impact on the City's infrastructure. A copy of the residents' petition can be found in the City Clerk's office. 9 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 • Highland Meadows West 3rd Addition, TSM Development, Resolution No. 01— 92, Preliminary Plat (3/5 Vote Required), Cindy Sherman — Ms. Sherman advised TSM Development, Inc., has submitted an application for a preliminary plat entitled Highland Meadows 3rd Addition. The subject site is located south of Main Street and west of Lake Drive. The property is planned for low density residential uses and is zoned R -1/PDO and R -1 Districts. • • The proposed preliminary plat is a re -plat of a portion of Highland Meadows 2nd Addition and incorporates an additional 25 acres as part of the project. The Highland Meadows 2nd Addition included both single family and townhouse dwelling units in a subdivision based on coving design principals. The present application includes only single family residential lots. Ms. Sherman presented the staff analysis of the application noting comments from the Environmental Board were received. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this request and they recommended approval of the application based on conditions. She added that the conditions relating to the revised street alignment of Street A and Street D and revision of the plat to include 10,800 of buildable area on each lot have been met and are not included in the resolution. Council Member O'Donnell referred to the condition relatin Public Services Director is satisfied. Public Services Dire with the park dedication condition. ation and asked if the er indicated he is satisfied Council Member O'Donnell asked what was do e dr ddress `A' e issues of the Environmental Board. City Planner Smyser advised a memo from the nviron rental Specialist dated June 22 addressed all the issues. The Environmental Specialist a • ig ff on the project. City Engineer Powell noted the condom impervious surface. Council Member Dahl inquir Planner Smyser advised the City develop a new ordinance t o the width of the streets is to reduce the t th eplacement of the trees that are being cut down. City s not have a tree replacement policy. The City is trying to hat but more staff and additional funds are needed. Mayor Bergeson asked if th a eveloper is agreeable to the items from the Environmental Board. Mr. Steve Schmidt, developer for the project, came forward and stated the trees will be moved where it is applicable, however, there are drainage issues. There will be a landscaping escrow for additional trees. Over 100 trees have already been moved. There are six (6) existing houses on the site that will hook up to City utilities. Council Member O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 01— 91, based on the following conditions: 1. Any existing structure not located on a proposed lot within required setbacks is to be removed at the time of final plat approval. 10 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 2. All grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. Outlots A and D, minus the land necessary to replace existing park land costs with extension of Arlo Lane, are dedicated in partial satisfaction of park dedication requirements. The balance of required parkland dedication will be provided in the form of cash fee in lieu of land as prescribed by the Subdivision Ordinance. 4. Outlots B and C are conveyed to the appropriate landowners for access and a buffer strip, respectively. 5. Comments of other commissions and City Staff Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Mayor Bergeson inquired about the double frontage lots. Mr. Schmidt advised the lots are 145 feet deep and landscapi s w be'�o e for a buffer. City Planner Smyser clarified that the resolution refers o ®hlam+ eadows West 3rd Addition. Council Member Dahl inquired about the buffer eening. Mr. Schmidt advised 50 double row pine tr - ha alr -f dy been planted. Mayor Bergeson noted there are some u • f . `age lots on Birch Street that are very well screened by trees. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No 01 — 91 c '•` � in the City Clerk's office. Lino Lakes Family Dentist tl', Resolution No. 01— 92, Site Plan Review (3/5 Vote Required), Cindy Sherman — Ms. Sherman advised Lino Lakes Family Dentistry has submitted site and building plans for construction of 5,067 square foot medical office building on property located on Apollo Drive. The subject site is approximately 65, 340 square feet in size. The property is guided for future commercial development by the Comprehensive Plan and is zoned GB, General Business District. Medical office uses are allowed within this District as a permitted use. Development of a commercial use is subject to site and building plan review as provided for by Section 2, subd. 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Sherman presented the staff analysis of the application noting the Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the application and they recommended approval of the site plan based on conditions. She noted several of the conditions have already been met and staff is recommending approval be based on the following conditions: 11 • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 1. Parking shall meet ADA standards. 2. All utilities, easements and grading plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. Site access is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Anoka County. 4. Park dedication requirements are satisfied in the based upon current City policies and Ordinance. Council Member Carlson referred to page 3 of the staff report relating to the parking area and stalls. She asked if the condition relating to the utilities, easements and grading plans addressed that issue. Ms. Sherman indicated the second condition does address the parking area and stalls. Council Member Carlson inquired about City liability if the City a difficult for vehicles to back out of. The City Attorney advised so it is adequate. Council Member Dahl asked if one handicapped parki Mr. Scott Mower, Progressive Architecture, cam an eight (8) foot wide concrete area next to the s this number of stalls. There is also an area mething that it knows is oes meet ADA standards and an referred to the site plan noting there is code requires one handicapped stall for Council Member O'Donnell asked if roperty that was MUSA swapped. City Planner Smyser advised the MUSA swap d. • cc Mayor Bergeson asked if the ote `' al buyer for the second site. Mr. Mower advised the in other user is unknown at this point. City Engineer Powell advise staff is recommending a requirement for a concrete curb. Also, a regional pond was constructed that this site will drain into. Council Member Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 01 — 92, based on the following conditions: 1. Parking shall meet ADA standards. 2. All utilities, easements and grading plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. Site access is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Anoka County. • • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 4. Park dedication requirements are satisfied based upon current City policies and Ordinance. 5. A concrete curb will be required. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 01 — 92 can be found in the City Clerk's office. Centennial School District #12, FIRST READING, Ordinance 14 — 01, Rezone (4/5 Vote Required); Resolution No. 01— 93, Minor Subdivision (3/5 Vote Required), Cindy Sherman — Ms. Sherman advised ISD 12 has a letter of intent to purchase 15+ acres of industrial zoned land located at the northeast corner of the existing Centennial Middle School site for the purpose of building a new elementary school. The site is currently zoned L -I, Light Industrial and would require a change in zoning to PSP, Public /Semi- Public District to accommod e elementary school. The School District has requested consideration of the followin facilitate a new elementary school at this location. nt applications to 1. Rezoning from L -I, Limited Industrial •nin Disc flcto PSP, Public /Semi - Public Zoning District. 2. Subdivision to create a parcel to Ms. Sherman presented the staff analysi is a policy decision that is determine decision against the criteria outlin request and they recommended conditions. ed to the School District. application noting that any land use or zoning change ouncil. In this request, the Council must weigh its sta report. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this of the zoning change and minor subdivision based on Council Member Carlson = +Y transportation going to the west on a narrow two- (2) lane street. There is a Safe Streets Co tt = and she inquired when they will be getting a plan regarding the reconstruction of Elm Street ity Engineer Powell advised a detailed feasibility study will be presented this fall, which will be based on 2002 construction. There will be many neighborhood meetings. Mayor Bergeson inquired about the construction schedule for the school. Mr. Chrisitianson, Superintendent, indicating the School District is looking at occupying the school in September 2002. Ms. Sherman advised the Council will be reviewing the site plan application. Council Member Carlson moved to approve FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 14 — 01, as presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. 13 • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 Council Member Dahl voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Council Member Carlson voted yea. Council Member O'Donnell voted yea. Council Member Reinert voted yea. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 01 — 93, based on the following conditions: 1. The elementary school is combined with the middle school site to create a single lot. 2. The applicant pursue a conditional use permit and submit detailed development plans for the site. The site plan should illustrate how the plan will be integrated with the middle school. 3. Wetland replacement plans will be required and sub Rice Creek Watershed. e review and approval of 4. Vacation of the west half of 4u' Street throw h •ropsed site will be required. 5. Appropriate easements must be establ and rear lot lines. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion o an c. ied unanimously. Resolution No 01 — 93 can be found t • e' : erk's office. existing utilities and along side Behm's Century Farm Park Final Plat (3/5 Vote Require approved the preliminary,.lat for received for approval of t Century Farm Development, Resolution No. 01— 94, ser — City Planner Smyser advised the City Council 's Farm Park Addition on May 29, 2001. A request has been The City typically requires a mber of things for a final plat approval. These include: • Final plat must substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat. • Development agreement must be completed, including financial securities. • Title must be reviewed by City Attorney. • Conditions of approval must be met. The final plat conforms to the preliminary plat. No development agreement is necessary, as all roads and utilities exist. The City Attorney has confirmed that no title work is necessary for the plat approval because the City owns the property and will be selling it to the developer. S City Planner Smyser reviewed the conditions of approval for the preliminary plat, noting the two- (2) ordinances were published June 18. They will be in effect July 18. The closing (when the City will 14 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 . sell the land to the developer) has been arranged for July 20. The City will not release the signed plat hard- shells for recording until July 18. This requirement is included in Resolution No. 01— 94 approving the final plat. The developer has provided a copy of the disclosure statement. It notifies buyers that "typical aircraft operations may result in perceptible noise and light effect" within the development area. • • Council Member Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 01— 94, as presented. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 01 — 94 can be found in the City Clerk's office. Consider Resolution No. 01— 95, Sealcoating, John Powell — City Engineer Powell advised each year the City maintains its streets by sealcoating. Sealcoating places a thin layer of oil and rock on the street to enhance the surface. Candidate streets include new streets that received the wear course 2 - 3 years ago and all other streets are done on a 5 - 7 year cycle. This ye streets will be sealcoated at an estimated cost of $87,000. The 200 sealcoating. It is proposed to fund the difference between the b from the City's Sealcoating fund. City staff has prepared the and are requesting Council approval to advertise for bids. roximately 7 miles of ncludes $58,850 for t and the final bid amount cifications for this work Council Member Carlson moved to adopt Resolution ''ia 95, as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unan. Resolution No. 01 — 95 can be found in the t rk' ; office. Consider Resolution No. 01— 96, 2004 the City undertakes a paving proje wearing course, in those develo, this work is provided by asse wearing course this year • clude Additions, and Pheasant rse, John Powell — City Engineer Powell advised e. ' "'• place the final layer of bituminous, known as the here the majority of lots have been built on. The funding for e respective subdivisions. The subdivisions receiving ater Creek 3rd Addition, Trappers Crossing 2nd and 3rd e 10th Addition. The schedule for this projec City Council Approves Plans and Specifications City Council Authorizes Ad for Bids Open Bids City Council Awards Contract Construction Begins July 9, 2001 July 9, 2001 August 20, 2001 August 27, 2001 September 3, 2001 Council Member Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 01 — 96, as presented. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 01 — 96 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 15 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 9, 2001 • UNFINISHED BUSINESS June 19, 2001, Council Work Session Minutes — Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve the June 19, 2001, Council Work Session Minutes, as presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Carlson abstaining. NEW BUSINESS - None COMMUNITY CALENDAR JULY 10, 2001 THROUGH JULY 23, 2001: Special Council Work Session, Wednesday, July 11, 2001, 5:30 p.m. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, July 11, 2001, 6:30 p.m. EDAC Meeting, Thursday, July 12, 2001, 7:00 a.m. Charter Commission Meeting, Thursday, July 12, 2001, 7:0 Special Environmental Board Meeting, Wednesday, J TBA Council Work Session, Wednesday, July 18, 2001, pip • City Council Meeting, Monday, July 23, 2001 ADJOURN There being no further business, C e o'er O'Donnell moved to adjourn at 10:15 p.m. Council Member Dahl seconde on. Motion carried unanimously. These minutes were cons'dered . +proved at the regular Council Meeting July 23, 2001. Transcribed by: Kim Points TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • 16 John ,'ergeso, Ma r • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES : July 18, 2001 . 5:35 p.m. . 11:25 p.m. : Council Member Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson : None Staff members present: City Administrator, Linda Waite Smith; Cit Powell; Economic Development Director, Brian Wessel (part); Assistant, Mary Alice Divine (part); Chief of Police, Dave P -c Development Director, Mike Grochala; Finance Director, Police, Dave Pecchia (part); and Public Services Direct Engineer, John c Development ; Community ); Chief of dner (part) INTERVIEW PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CANDIDATES the Planning and Zoning Board Council Members interviewed Mr. Michael vacancy. Mayor Bergeson advised the annoux c q e ' ating to the vacancy would be made prior to the next Planning and Zonin : • . ®m ing on August 8, 2001. WEST SHADOW POND, JH OWELL City Engineer Powell , bute 'copies of letters from Mr. and Mrs. Junes and Mr. Arnold Rehbein. He st residents would like to address the Council regarding the West Shadow Ponds de9opment. He noted there is no action this evening relating to this item. The West Shadow Ponds development project will be discussed further at the August 8, 2001, Council work session. Mr. Wayne Junes, 599 62nd Street, came forward and stated he would like to sell his property and he believes the development is a good project. He stated he does not believe traffic will be a problem. He added that staff and the Planning and Zoning Board are recommending approval of the project. Mr. Arnold Rehbein, 607 62nd Street, came forward and stated he also believes the project is a good project and it does fit with the neighborhood. He indicated he would also like to sell his property. • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 Mr. Tom Brickner came forward and distributed a petition with 321 signatures. He read the petition that indicates the residents are in favor of the roadway extension to 62nd Street without a barricade. He referred to a drawing of the area noting that residents feel it is important to connect the roadway now. He read comments from Council Members from previous meetings regarding problems with a barricade. He responded to the concerns of residents on 62nd Street that were expressed at a previous Council meeting. He stated that safety is a big issue and the driving force behind the petition. He gave facts relating to safety concerns including the number of children in the area, number of path crossings and visibility issues. He stated that the disbursing of traffic on two (2) routes does make the most sense. He asked that the City be consistent with all developments noting the residents want a second access. A connection needs to be made now to 62nd Street and 62nd Street should be improved as soon as funds become available. City Engineer Powell advised from an engineering standpoint, he would not recommend a connection until the improvements to 62nd Street have been made to pedestrian traffic. He stated there is no way to separate the vehicular traff nd destrian traffic. Other options have been discussed that include construction , :, a ► -des an trail along 62nd Street. Council Member O'Donnell asked how the plat wa app ove1 ity Engineer Powell advised the Planning and Zoning Board approve . . a with a recommendation to develop a cul -de -sac. He noted the speed limit off`: =� e roadway is 30 mph. Council Member Reinert stated discussi the north end of the roadway. He in improve 62nd Street so the road c Council Member Carlson Shadow being extended t building bigger fasteroads ju found. be n held about placing the barricade on he would like to explore other options to d now. he City's transportation plan noting it shows West roar =` ays as well. She stated she does not support get traffic through and hopes a compromise can be Mayor Bergeson advise other meeting will be held and notices will be sent out. Mr. Barry Rice stated he did send a fax to Council Members regarding this issue. He stated he would like to see the road punched through if the development goes in. He noted traffic continues to get worse in the area. Mr. Brian Olson, 511 Hawthorne, stated residents are concerned that they are not being heard. Residents have done their job with the petition. He stated he is very concerned that funds for 62nd Street will not be available until 2005. City Engineer Powell explained the State Aid Fund process noting Elm Street has been a priority for a long time. He indicated the Council could still decide to reconstruct 62nd Street and look at doing both 62nd Street and Elm Street within a few years. • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 Mr. Olson stated he believes traffic studies were done that indicated there would be minimal impact on 62nd Street without the reconstruction. He stated he wants to believe that everyone can work together and added that the residents are not opposed to the development. Council Member Reinert inquired about a mechanism to take the barricade down. City Engineer Powell advised the Council would make that decision. West Shadow and 62nd Street are State Aid roads and having a barricade in place may put the funds for reconstruction in jeopardy. Staff cannot guarantee that the barricade would be taken down. A resident inquired about the cost of a pedestrian path. City Engineer Powell advised developers have contributed in the past to the cost of a path. He noted the path would more than likely be put in the right -of -way. Mayor Bergeson directed staff to provide additional inform • n'; a p ® estrian path for 62nd Street. City Engineer Powell advised the notices would go out on August 8, 2001. He noted he is concerned ab traffic on 62nd Street. TOWN CENTER UPDATE BRIAN WE regarding the meeting edestrian traffic and vehicular Update on Lino Lakes Marketp ;' : "essel — Economic Development Director Wessel advised the target date op in: > e Target store is still July 2002. Community Developmen 6 or chala stated staff has been working with the developer on redesigning they ess road and moving it to the north. Staff needs additional review tim ange. The County previously indicated they feel very strongly that the locatio f tie proposed second access would cause additional problems. The County and staff do - el that moving the access to the north is viable. The developer will have a new site plan tomorrow and a meeting will be held with the County on Monday. By moving the access to the north, the County will want 77th Street closed off to right in right out only. The neighbors on the east side will have to go to the north to exit the neighborhood. The neighbors on the west side of 77th Street will have to go up to 79th Street when going home. Mayor Bergeson noted there are similar situations within the City and it has not been a problem. Council Member Carlson asked if 77th Street would be extended to Main Street. City Engineer Powell advised that option has been closed off with the shopping center. • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 Community Development Director Grochala stated the lots have changed as well as utility issues and the site plan. Staff needs time to review the changes but are trying to hold to the original schedule. Economic Development Director Wessel stated the Council should consider acting on the rezone Monday night and move the request for tax abatement and business subsidy agreement to the August 13th Council meeting. He added staff met with Ryan Companies last week and went through a conceptual negotiation that will hopefully end in an agreement. Finance Director Rolek advised a public hearing will be held regarding the Business Subsidy Policy and Tax Abatement Policy. He asked if Council Members are comfortable with the two -(2) policies. Mayor Bergeson asked if the policies are standards. Mr. Paul Steinman advised the policies are very standard an ' ies a e required to have these policies if they offer this type of assistance. Finance Director Rolek stated the policies are broa an are i Wedded to be used with other projects within the City at the Council's dis + The policies were reviewed by EDAC and their comments were incorporate . the documents. Council Member Carlson stated the polies the wage rate percentage is very low consistent with EDA policy. Council Member O'Donnel question with the current the developer has ind' ated th d to be precise. She noted she believes Director Rolek stated the wage guideline is the City can accurately address the but/for fro yan Companies. Finance Director Rolek stated w'thout the subsidy they will not build in Lino Lakes. Finance Director Rolek istr'.uted and reviewed the numbers of the four -(4) options included in the Ryan Co ter Proposal for subsidy noting the original offer made by the City. He stated the city cost of acquiring a remnant piece of JADT property is the big unknown. The City would have to go through the eminent domain process to determine the value of the property. Economic Development Director Wessel stated he believes the City is in a good position to negotiate the price of the property with the property owner. Council Member O'Donnell asked if the City can structure the deal so Ryan Companies gets a set discount on the price that the City pays for the land. Economic Development Director Wessel stated that option is possible and staff will discuss it with Ryan Companies. • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 Finance Director Rolek added that the City may be able to assess part of the cost of the property to JADT through special assessments. Council Member Carlson suggested the City could also make an offer to Mr. Baylor for the property. Council directed staff to negotiate with Ryan Companies an index cost within the agreement and a payback period of five (5) years. Finance Director Rolek recommended the Council table and continue the public hearings on the Request for Tax Abatement and the Business Subsidy Agreement. CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY ON BIRCH STREET, MIKE GROCHALA Community Development Director Grochala advised the Centennia chool District requested two (2) rezones last month. One of the requests is to ezon e property they own on Birch Street from PSP to R -1X. The Planning and niBo. did not recommend approval. Mr. Christianson has asked to add il regarding this issue. Mr. Christianson, Superintendent of the School Di • Board had no issues with the compatibility of =h The Board did not feel the rezone was appro riate Council for feedback before Council action 1 en • Mr. Christianson gave the backgr has owned the property since 19 May. He distributed a copy wetland. He also distrib work would be necessary to . d �.e school or secondary s.`a �� Th construction on anothe tate.'the Planning and Zoning uest lr the Comprehensive Plan. other reasons. He asked the the property noting the School District . The 'e` was not evaluated as a school site until last etland delineation noting 13 acres of the property is py the soil borings report that indicated a lot of site a school. The site is not large enough for a middle intent is to market the property and use those dollars for Mayor Bergeson advised the new Comprehensive Plan will limit the amount of land within the City that will be developed. Zoning does not guarantee the property will be developed. Council Member O'Donnell requested the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Board meeting be included in the Friday packets. He asked if the parcel of land costs the School District anything right now. Mr. Christianson indicated the property does not cost the School District any money at this time. • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 Council Member Reinert advised a Planning and Zoning Board Member had indicated to him the concern about neighbors paying more dollars for property that abuts school property. A representative for a resident on Timberwolf stated that what came through at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting was that the lots were sold at a premium. The property is not costing the School District anything right now and the property may be needed for a school in the future. Mr. Christianson stated the School District may take the money from the sale and purchase another property that is more suitable for a future school according to the growth pattern. He stated it will be more expensive to purchase property ten years down the road for a more suitable location. Community Development Director Grochala advised the public hearing was held at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Residents were notified ti meeting. Notices will not go out when the issue comes before Counci Mayor Bergeson stated a rezone does take two (2) rea discussion about the notification process. Mayor Bergeson called for a short recess at 8401: Mayor Bergeson reconvened the meeti UPDATE ON VILLAGE, MAR ,., o TVINE i needs to have a Economic Development As is `.4± c p ivine advised staff met with the developers last Friday and discussed the ia ac of t reform. The land acquisition will need financial aid from somewhere. The Ci applying for another grant. The developer of the housing felt he had to s ediately regarding the market studies. A discussion has been held regarding the pity Faking the lead on the market study. Staff agreed to pay 2/3 of the study with grant d Mars. The studies will cost between 13,000 — 14,000. The City will be reimbursed if the project proceeds. The study will be owned by the City and should be completed by August 27, 2001. The study could also be funded by the Economic Development Department budget. Economic Development Assistant Divine added more information about the YMCA site plan should be available next week. The commercial developer needs more specifics about the YMCA because they feel the YMCA is the anchor. • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 CONSIDER STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON BANKING SERVICES, AL ROLEK Finance Director Rolek advised in May of this year staff mailed Requests for Proposals for Banking Services (RFP) to each bank within the City, Firstar Bank, Community National Bank and Lino Lakes State Bank. The City received responses from each of these institutions. Upon comparing and evaluating the responses, staff found that all banks met the basic criteria and had the ability to deliver the services requested in the RFP. Two (2) of the institutions, Lino Lakes State Bank and Community State Bank, offered the best package of services and costs and were virtually identical in this regard. Other criteria of a more intangible nature, such as customer service orientation, community involvement, etc., were also considered in the evaluation. Again, both institutions have a high emphasis on customer relations and are involved in community events and service. At present the City maintains one checking account, which is City's needs. It has been suggested that perhaps the City co the institutions. While this may sound like a good soluti • ` on he in twice the time and work the staff would have to dedicates; this uate for the ccounts between ce it would result ea in terms of record keeping, reconciliations, etc. A better solution might betto co i` er the institutions not designated as the depository for outside financin City would have from time to time. This wou in the City's overall financial goals. In addi on, th three (3) years, at which time it is antic ±ate submit proposals. ted notes and special needs the rd them the opportunity to participate ity will revisit the RFP process in anks will be again invited to Finance Director Rolek reco Bank for banking services fo 2004. He noted neither the no to five (5) years or bee both are good institutio the ity accept the proposal from Lino Lakes State (3) year term extending through December 31, State Bank or the Community State Bank are capitalized mmunity for five (5) years. He indicated he believes This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, July 23, 2001, 6:30 p.m. DISCUSS NO PARKING ORDINANCE, RICK DEGARDNER Public Services Director DeGardner advised the Public Services and Public Safety departments are recommending to the Council to amend Section 802 of the City Code pertaining to "parking ". The proposed ordinance prohibits parking of vehicles on a City street between the hours of 2:00 am — 6:00 am, from November 1 — April 1. Parking is also prohibited when 2 or more inches of snow has accumulated until the street has been plowed. Residences without an established driveway, to include new construction, are exempt from winter parking restrictions. • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 The impetus for the proposed ordinance is due to the impact "snowbirds" have on the plowing operations of the Public Services Department. A typical accumulation of 2" — 3" takes the Public Services personnel approximately nine hours to clear all the roads, dead ends, parking lots, and cul -de -sacs. Snowbirds prolong this process since Public Services personnel need to back track to re -plow the snowbird areas. The Public Safety Department supports the proposed ordinance for various reason including less exposure to possible theft from vehicles and hit and run incidents, as well as better emergency vehicle access. Temporary exemptions may be granted in advance by contacting a police officer from the Lino Lakes Police Department. If the proposed ordinance is approved, staff will communicate the winter parking restrictions to residents by including an article in the fall and winter City newsletters, submitting an article to the Quad, and placing the new ordinance i� ation on cable. City Administrator Waite Smith advised a public hearing is ,� ±t 'em ireR for this type of ordinance change. Mayor Bergeson inquired about the enforcement when the or Vince first goes into effect. Chief Pecchia advised the City will do a lot of notif tti `„ . If conditions allow, warnings will be given until people become familiar wit •rdinance. This item will appear on the regular Cocilgenda onday, July 23, 2001, 6:30 p.m. UPDATE ON QUAD CITIES POLI Chief Pecchia gave an upda (2) officers have been dis condition. RICT PROPOSAL, DAVE PECCHIA shooting incident in Columbia Heights noting two ne officer remains in the hospital in good City Administrator Wai - nth stated the Circle Pines City Council has agreed to pursue a joint police departmen , They would prefer the joint department begins in January 2003 and year 2002 be a transition year. She stated she has not heard from the City of Centerville. Chief Pecchia stated that after the Council presentation of the Joint Police Department, he offered to make a presentation to the Centennial Lakes Police Commission at a future date. The Centennial Lakes Police Commission discussed this issue at their meeting last Thursday night before having the presentation. The issue was discussed at length and several Centennial Lakes Police Department officers threatened to quit the force. Chief Pecchia stated it is evident there is a savings for all cities with a Joint Police Department. It can also be a great service to the communities that are involved. He stated he believes the City should wait until other cities show a substantial commitment CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 • to a Quad Cities Police Department before more research is done. He added the Police Department will move ahead with the 2002 budget for Lino Lakes. • • Council Member Carlson asked if other cities can go ahead with the plan in another year. Chief Pecchia advised that based on the current agreement, two (2) cites can vote to disband and have one year for transition. CONDITIONAL POLICE OFFICER JOB TO CSO JIM CARROLL, DAVE PECCHIA Chief Pecchia stated that at the July 9 Council meeting, Council approved a twenty -seven month leave of absence for Police Officer Shawn Silvera. The plan is to re- integrate Officer Silvera into the department upon his return from the Peace Corps. This would fit into the growth plan for the department. The department would like to fill the vacancy created by Officer Silvera's departure by promoting Jim Carroll, cptly the City's Community Service Officer. Mr. Carroll has been with the department since April of ( O. His ®:` otion is the customary way the department fills vacancies. This item will appear on the regular Council agen CONDITIONAL CSO JOB OFFER TO ay, July 23, 2001, 6:30 p.m. ABIL'UBASH, DAVE PECCHIA Chief Pecchia stated that because of, will be created in the department the hiring of Nabil Gubash for officer with the department ose promotion of Jim Carroll, a vacancy ity service officer. Staff is recommending position. Mr. Gubash is currently a reserve ending school for law enforcement. The duties for this position iris d- responding to animal complaints, office duties and general assistance to s ers. This item will appear on he regular Council agenda Monday, July 23, 2001, 6:30 p.m. UPDATE ON CSAH 49 RECONSTRUCTION, CONSIDER LETTER TO ANOKA COUNTY, JOHN POWELL City Engineer Powell distributed a draft letter to be sent to the County Engineer, John Olson. The letter indicates the City does support the Context Sensitive Design approach and is committed to exploring all funding options. Council Member Carlson expressed concern that the County is moving ahead with their original plans. City Engineer Powell stated all interested parties will have input on the design of the roadway. The County has proceeded with the purchase of property because it will be needed regardless of how the roadway is designed. • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 City Engineer Powell advised a work plan and budget will be presented to the Council in August 2001. Council Member O'Donnell asked if the Context Sensitive Design is just for the roadway south of Birch. City Engineer Powell advised the Context Sensitive Design is just for the roadway south of Birch at this time. He stated he will speak to Bob Brown about including more of the roadway in this type of design. Council Member O'Donnell expressed concern about the residents having input about the design of the roadway from Birch to Lake Drive. Council Member Dahl indicated she is supportive of the letter but is concerned bout the lack of response from the County. It was the consensus of the Council to send the letter as written ANOKA COUNTY REQUEST TO PURCHASE " • . EIS" P ' 0'' ERTY, JOHN POWELL City Engineer Powell advised in 1995 the City pub' {. rom Anoka County a .7 -acre property known as the "Kaiser" property on th~no east corner of Birch Street and Hodgson Road. The property has a small a. ndone home and several outbuildings, and is zoned General Business. The purchas •ri was :61,400. The intent for the use of the prop o tr e it available for commercial development. However, Anok ty 1 i concluded that it needed a significant storm water pond purposes related to the amount of the parcel for ro reconstruction of Hodgso The County Board has ;,a Q purchasing the entire parcel back from the City at the current market value o Po `: 8, a 10. The owner of Apitz Garage and the County will subsequently negotiate • v. agreement for the remainder of the land for the expansion of the Apitz facilities. He noted this item was referred back to City staff on June 11, 2001. City Engineer Powell distributed a drawing showing the property noting the majority of the property will be used for ponding. Council Member Reinert asked if there is an immediate need to sell the property. City Engineer Powell advised the City should show a good faith gesture in working with the County. Council Member O'Donnell indicated he can support the sale of the property. Mayor Bergeson indicated he also supports the sale of the property. • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 Council Member Reinert asked that this issue be taken off the regular agenda. Council Member Carlson indicated she is supportive of removing this item from the agenda. Council Member Dahl advised she would also like this item removed from the agenda. This item will appear on a future Council work session agenda. LETTER TO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REGARDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT LAKE DRIVE AND 35W NORTH BOUND, JOHN POWELL City Engineer Powell distributed a draft letter written to Mr. Carl Ohrn at the Metropolitan Council. The letter indicated the City is ready to prod zz, • with signalizing the intersection pending completion of a traffic study of the ent inte change area It was the consensus of Council to send the letter as writt LINO LAKES MARKETPLACE EAW, MICHAEL,GR, CI ALA Community Development Director Grochala tiff d the comment period has ended. The DNR, Pollution Control Agency, Metropoli ; Cou it and Historical Society has responded. Staff is required to respond .. th`- .mm nts. Community Development Direct . :cr . a'` viewed the comments and recommendations from the En inn ent oard that were received this evening noting the main concern is run-off eviewed the staff response to the comments made by the Environmental Bo .ppea ed the Environmental Board was supportive of the EAW, with changes, til lat he evening. He read the motion made by an Environmental Board garding the recommendation to table the EIS determination on Mon e ev ning. The motion passed 3 -2. The Environmental Board indicated they would like to table the EIS determination until the Rice Creek Watershed District give their approval and until the Corp of Engineers has submitted their information. Community Development Director Grochala advised the project can not proceed unless the Rice Creek Watershed District give their approval. Staff will make the changes that the Environmental Board recommended. This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, July 23, 2001, 6:30 p.m. GAS FRANCHISE FEE, MAYOR BERGESON • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 18, 2001 Mayor Bergeson read a memo from the City Administrator regarding the Council's position on gas franchise fees. The City Administrator is asking if the Council would like to offer some type of relief to the users that have a franchise fee due to the low temperatures and high natural gas prices this past winter. The City Administrator would also like to know if the Council would consider putting a cap on the franchise fees or phasing the fees out over time. Mayor Bergeson added the 7% franchise fee is based on sales. One option is to collect an amount based on volume in a normal year. He stated he did speak with Vern Reinert who indicated he would like to meet with the Council. Council Member O'Donnell stated he would consider capping the fee if there is no impact on the budget. He requested this issue be discussed further at a future work session. REGULAR AGENDA, JULY 23, 2001 Item 1B, Consider Donation of $00 to Centennial 13 A Bas AAU National Championship Games in Sherwood, Ark requested a policy be developed relating to donations am ;p Compete in Member Carlson Item 7E, FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 08 — i ; `elhig Property on the northeast corner of Birch Street/Hodgson Road to Ano my — his item was removed from the agenda. The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 These minutes were considere August 8, 2001. te d approved at the regular Council meeting held on Transcribed by: Kim Points TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 12 Jo Berge✓ ✓son, ayor