The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/09/2004 Council Packet• • AMENDED AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, February 9, 2004 Council Chambers 6:15 p.m. (Special Council Work Session — EDAC Appointments) City Council meeting 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items 1. Consent Agenda - A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) February 9, 2004 (Check No. 70241 through 70333 in the amount of $349,548.81). ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14097 through 14117 in the amount of $33,826.22). B) Consider Adoption of Resolution. No. 04 -26, Approving 1 to 4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License, Lino Lakes Lions Club. 2. Open Mike 3. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) None. 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consider Resolution No. 04 -25 Approving Wine and Beer License for Mansetti's Pizza, (Spirit Hills Center), Ann Blair B) Consider Non -Union Salary Adjustments for 2004 Page 1 • • AMENDED AGENDA 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) Consider Resolution No. 04 -20 Accepting Donation of $5,000 from Centennial Firefighters for Command Vehicle 6. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) None. 7. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala A) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -21, Adopting 2004 Environmental Board Goals, Marty Asleson B) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -19, Making a Negative Declaration on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for Legacy at Woods Edge, Michael Grochala C) Consideration of Resolution No. 0 (this item will be considered on the February 23, 2004 Council agenda) D) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -18, Approving MUSA Extension, Conditional Use Permit and Variance, VFW, Jeff Smyser E) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 02 -04, Rezoning Certain Real Property from R -4, High Density Residential to R -3, Medium Density Residential, NE corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane, Jeff Smyser F) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -22, Approving Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 2004 Wear Course Project, Jim Studenski G) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -23, Approving Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 2004 Seal Coat Project, Jim Studenski 8. Unfinished Business A) None. 9. New Business A) Approval of minutes of Special Council Work Session (Administrator Search Process) November 24, 2003 • B) Approval of minutes of City Council Work Session, January 7, 2004 Page 2 • AMENDED AGENDA C) Approval of minutes of City Council Meeting January 12, 2004 D) Approval of minutes of City Council Work Session, January 21, 2004 E) Approval of minutes of City Council Meeting January 26, 2004 10. Community Calendar, February 10, 2004 through February 23, 2004: A) Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, February 11, 2004, 6:30 p.m. B) Council Work Session, Wednesday, February 18, 2004, 5:30 p.m. C) City Council Meeting, Monday, February 23, 2004, 6:30 p.m. D) Environmental Board Meeting, February 25, 2004, 6:30 p.m. E) Public Safety Citizens Academy, February 25, 2004, 7 p.m. 11. Adjourn Revised 02/03/04 mmg 12:19 p.m. Page 3 EXPENDITURES FEBRUARY 9, 2004 • Date: 01/22/2004 Time: 09:14:39 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Rs: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3681 - 3681 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail/ Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000073 MCCARTHY, KELLY ANN 1 410.00 410.00 .00 .00 000110 A T a T WIRELESS 1 49.00 49.00 .00 .00 000174 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 7,661.52 7,661.52 .00 .00 000370 CENTRAL COMMUINICATIONS 2 1,341.00 1,341.00 .00 .00 000502 D. THOMAS JEWELRY 1 140.00 140.00 .00 .00 000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 1 134.95 134.95 .00 .00 001260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 1 174.00 174.00 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 437.26 437.26 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 71.30 71.30 .00 .00 002770 MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY 1 503.97 503.97 .00 .00 0 0 XCEL ENERGY 1 3,240.13 3,240.13 .00 .00 0 9 QUALITY CHECKED CONSTRUCTION 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 003940 SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE 1 1,089.08 1,089.08 .00 .00 004040 SMITH, PEG 1 191.52 191.52 .00 .00 004070 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 1 1,328.60 1,328.60 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 16 18,272.33 18,272.33 .00 .00* • Date: 01/22/2004 Time: 09:17:47 es: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3682 3682 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 1 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount - Lost 000424 ANOKA COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 6,500.00 6,500.00 .00 .00 004309 MALONEY, MARK 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 004749 WAGNER, STEVE 1 90.45 90.45 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 4 6,810.45 6,810.45 .00 .00* Date: 01/28/2004 Time: 13:12:05 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ran Illi Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3692 - 3692 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank 8: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 6,309.56 6,309.56 .00 .00 004440 TJB SUPER ENERGY HOMES, INC. 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 900395 MAJESTIC OAKS, INC. 1 322.09 322.09 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 3 8,131.65 8,131.65 .00 .00* • • Date: 01/28/2004 Time: 13:12:19 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3693 - 3693 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Vendor # 000539 000595 • Name Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost TARGET HOGSTAD, LISA 1 144.93 144.93 .00 .00 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 2 344.93 344.93 .00 .00* Date: 02/03/2004 Time: 08:36:27 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (r) 3704 3704 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: s Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 10,434.99 10,434.99 .00 .00 000421 ANOKA COUNTY TREASURER 1 1,320.00 1,320.00 .00 .00 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 3 6,681.15 6,681.15 .00 .00 002788 QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER, INC. 1 39.20 39.20 .00 .00 003443 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER, INC. 1 490.48 490.48 .00 .00 003783 RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. 1 39,297.03 39,297.03 .00 .00 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 4 6,336.21 6,336.21 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 83.15 83.15 .00 .00 004100 SPRINGSTED, INC. 1 6,000.00 6,000.00 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 79.64 79.64 .00 .00 jili/0 T.K.D.A. 21 110,565.86 110,565.86 .00 .00 7 ARNT CONSTRUCTION, INC. 3 101,783.34 101,783.34 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 39 283,111.05 283,111.05 .00 .00* • Date: 02/03/2004 Time: 08:38:02 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal �s: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3709 - 3709 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000082 J. H. LARSON COMPANY, INC. 1 242.46 242.46 .00 .00 000095 ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. 1 41.00 41.00 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 5 130.75 130.75 .00 .00 000260 AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC. 1 142.91 142.91 .00 .00 000278 CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL, INC. 1 327.42 327.42 .00 .00 000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 2 307.80 307.80 .00 .00 000349 MINNEAPOLIS, CITY OF 1 432.00 432.00 .00 .00 000370 CENTRAL COMMUINICATIONS 1 5.57 5.57 .00 .00 000484 ARMOR SECURITY, INC. 1 134.00 134.00 .00 .00 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 85.97 85.97 .00 .00 0 8 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS 1 1,024.00 1,024.00 .00 .00 04 MINNESOTA JUVENILE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 1 165.00 165.00 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 4 431.31 431.31 .00 .00 001000 CATCO PARTS, INC. 1 8.52 8.52 .00 .00 001048 HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC. 1 295.05 295.05 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 502.66 502.66 .00 .00 001230 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 152.77 152.77 .00 .00 001278 DNR WATERS 1 4,072.50 4,072.50 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 3,106.40 3,106.40 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 394.93 394.93 .00 .00 001455 FBI NORTHWEST CHAPTER /FBINAA 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 307.78 307.78 .00 .00 Date: 02/03/2004 Time 08:38:02 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount V # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001600 GALL'S INC. 1 62.28 62.28 .00 .00 001720 GRAINGER, INC. 1 42.48 42.48 .00 .00 001859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 28.07 28.07 .00 .00 001897 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF CHIEFS OF POLICE 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 001920 SUN TURF, INC. 2 238.72 238.72 .00 .00 001967 INTOXIMETERS, INC. 1 85.20 85.20 .00 .00 001982 US LINK 1 1,712.05 1,712.05 .00 .00 002270 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, INC. 1 866.77 866.77 .00 .00 002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 875.00 875.00 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 918.79 918.79 .00 .00 002530 MEDIATION SERVICES, INC. 1 1,738.00 1,738.00 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 7 607.91 607.91 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 2,737.80 2,737.80 .00 .00 002900 MN. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1 1,127.75 1,127.75 .00 .00 003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 1 566.88 566.88 .00 .00 02 PETTY CASH 1 175.21 175.21 .00 .00 0 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 4 144.83 144.83 .00 .00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 3 249.45 249.45 .00 .00 003926 SCHWAAB, INC. 1 35.73 35.73 .00 .00 004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 112.37 112.37 .00 .00 004305 M.A.L.E.F.I. 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 004310 ASSOC. OF METRO. MUNICIPALITIES 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 004320 ARMAN, SHELLY 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 004333 BOYER TRUCKS 1 207.90 207.90 .00 .00 004334 QUILL 1 302.39 302.39 .00 .00 004335 MN TURF & GROUNDS FOUNDATION 1 650.00 650.00 .00 .00 • Date: 02/03/2004 Time 08:38:03 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount V # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004370 TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC 1 2,416.01 2,416.01 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 1,244.55 1,244.55 .00 .00 004610 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1 130.00 130.00 .00 .00 004730 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC. 2 1,015.93 1,015.93 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 149.23 149.23 .00 .00 004890 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC. 1 410.95 410.95 .00 .00 900524 BURGER, LUANN 1 1,230.40 1,230.40 .00 .00 900528 MN DEPT PUBLIC SAFETY /EMERGENCY MGT 1 160.00 160.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 80 32,878.40 32,878.40 .00 .00* Date: 02/03/2004 Time: 08:43:45 Operator: JAL • Ranges: Options: Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) 3683 3716 (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 70245 70262 0 0 70253 0 0 70264 • 0 BURGER, LUANN DANCE CLASS /JAN -MAR YOUTH IN 70263 TARGET SUPPLIES YOUTH IN Total for Dept 207 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept ARMAN, SHELLY CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI HOGSTAD, LISA MN. DEPARTMENT OF PUBL PETTY CASH QUALITY CHECKED CONSTR SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK T.K.D.A. TJB SUPER ENERGY HOMES REIMBURSE PROGRAM AEC * * * * * * ** DONATION /COMPUTER NETWOR * * * * * * ** REIMS EMPLOYEE RECOG DIN * * * * * * ** SEIZED VEHICLE TABS * * * * * * ** SUPPLIES * * * * * * ** REIMS ADD'L ESCROW /6481 * * * * * * ** LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE /DEC * * * * * * ** HAILEY MANOR /DECEMBER * * * * * * ** REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6447 C * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** O INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS OFFICIALS 0 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, SOFTBALLS Total for Dept 202 ADULT SP ADULT SP 70247 D. THOMAS JEWELRY RECOGNITION PINS 0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI REGISTRATION /5- COUNCIL 70260 M MAJESTIC OAKS, INC. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION DIN 0 MEDIATION SERVICES, IN MEDIATION SERVICES O SCHWAAB, INC. STAMP O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 12, 21 Total for Dept 401 70242 ACCLAIM BENEFITS FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI 70251 MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECON 4TH QTR UNEMPLOYMENT 0 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING Total for Dept 402 O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 7, 8 Total for Dept 405 • MAYOR /CO MAYOR /CO MAYOR /CO MAYOR /CO MAYOR /CO MAYOR /CO ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST CHARTER Amount 30.00 6,500.00 200.00 1,127.75 88.17 1,500.00 4,206.75 25,212.09 1,500.00 40,364.76* 1,024.00 2,737.80 3,761.80* 1,230.40 91.02 1,321.42* 140.00 875.00 322.09 1,738.00 35.73 620.55 3,731.37* 174.00 79.04 19.91 75.00 347.95* 163.00 163.00* Date: 02/03/2004 Time: 08:43:45 Operator: JAL • Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY SENIORS 51.41 70256 SMITH, PEG MILEAGE SENIORS 191.52 Total for Dept 406 242.93* ANOKA COUNTY T IN TAX /SPEC ASSESS /TIF FINANCE 1,703.31 Total for Dept 407 1,703.31* O NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY ECONOMIC 19.91 O SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK TIF /DECEMBER ECONOMIC 16.20 Total for Dept 415 36.11* O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING PLANNING 19.95 O SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK VILLAGE EAW /DECEMBER PLANNING 2,113.26 O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 14 PLANNING 271.00 Total for Dept 416 2,404.21* O T.K.D.A. PROF SERV /DECEMBER Total for Dept 417 ENGINEER 42,818.40 42,818.40* 70241 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER POLICE 49.00 O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU SUPPLIES POLICE 1.92 70243 ANOKA COUNTY CHIEFS OF REISSUE DUES /2 POLICE 20.00 70244 ASPEN MILLS, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE 134.95 0 CENTRAL COMMUINICATION MODEM /FEBRUARY POLICE 5.57 70246 CENTRAL COMMUINICATION DIGITAL DATA /NOV & DEC POLICE 1,341.00 O FBI NORTHWEST CHAPTER/ MEMBERSHIP /DUES -DAVE P POLICE 60.00 O GALL'S INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE 62.28 •0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING POLICE 880.59 0 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF MEMBERSHIP POLICE 100.00 O INTOXIMETERS, INC. SUPPLIES POLICE 85.20 O M.A.L.E.F.I. DUES /STEVE & KYLE L POLICE 40.00 70249 MALONEY, MARK REIMBURSE CARTRIDGES POLICE 200.00 70250 MCCARTHY, KELLY ANN REIMBURSE TUITION POLICE 410.00 0 MINNEAPOLIS, CITY OF QUERY CHARGES POLICE 432.00 0 MINNESOTA JUVENILE OFF REGISTRATION /MELINDA POLICE 165.00 0 MN DEPT PUBLIC SAFETY/ REGISTRATION /DAVE P POLICE 160.00 70252 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER POLICE 437.26 O OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE 490.48 O PETTY CASH SUPPLIES POLICE 87.04 0 SHRED -IT, INC. DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT POLICE 54.95 O STREICHER'S, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE 79.64 70263 TARGET SUPPLIES POLICE 14.94 O US LINK MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY POLICE 554.91 70258 WAGNER, STEVE REIMBURSE BATTERIES POLICE 90.45 Total for Dept 420 5,957.18* O TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC SOFTWARE LICENSE /SUPPORT BUILDING 2,416.01 O UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT REGISTRATION /VERN R BUILDING 130.00 Total for Dept 422 2,546.01* • Date: 02/03/2004 Time 08:43:45 Operator: JAL • Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O STREETS 70251 UNEMPLOYMENT STREETS O SERVICE /JANUARY STREETS O MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY STREETS O GLASS /PLUGS /MUFFS /TAPE /G STREETS Total for Dept 430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70248 0 0 0 0 70255 0 0 0 0 0 0 70261 70248 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70259 70261 70248 0 0 0 0 0 70259 • AMERICAN FASTENER & SU MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECON NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS US LINK VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENT AMERICAN FASTENER & SU AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC BOYER TRUCKS CATCO PARTS, INC. CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPME CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL, DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GRAINGER, INC. HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC. HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV MENARDS, INC. SEARS COMMERCIAL ONE ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, SUN TURF, INC. ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, I ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. ARMOR SECURITY, INC. C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE J. H. LARSON COMPANY, LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, MENARDS, INC. QUILL US LINK WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. XCEL ENERGY CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF FRATTALLONE'S BOLTS 4TH QTR MONTHLY SUPPLIES SERVICE /PRESSURE WASHER REPAIR HYDRAULIC PARTS SEAL KIT /WIPER SEAL FILTER GASOHOL PARTS /SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS /SUPPLIES LATCH /SPRING /SEAL KIT WINDSHIELD CORD SUPPLIES DRILL /TOOLS PARTS PARTS REPLACEMENT BROOM Total for Dept, 431 HARDWARE MENARDS, INC. MN TURF & GROUNDS FOUN NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS US LINK VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENT XCEL ENERGY FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET REPAIR FENDER/ #317 GOVERNME STRAIGHTEN SOLENOID GOVERNME OFFICE SUPPLIES GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER GOVERNME PARTS /SUPPLIES GOVERNME PARTS /SUPPLIES GOVERNME PAINT /REPAIR #317 GOVERNME SUPPLIES GOVERNME OFFICE SUPPLIES GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY GOVERNME SUPPLIES GOVERNME SUPPLIES GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER GOVERNME Total for Dept 432 MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER PARKS PARTS /SUPPLIES PARKS SUPPLIES PARKS REGISTRATION /MIKE H PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY PARKS SLIP SOLES PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER PARKS 76.83 407.86 50.03 109.29 312.37 956.38* 52.00 142.91 207.90 8.52 152.77 327.42 3,106.40 566.88 307.78 5.95 42.48 295.05 28.07 245.38 1,089.08 112.37 238.72 410.95 7,340.63* 41.00 134.00 431.31 5,861.13 42.54 242.46 866.77 273.35 302.39 779.44 149.23 307.80 3,047.77 12,479.19* 448.43 7.42 89.18 650.00 101.13 136.37 391.20 112.96 Date: 02/03/2004 Time 08:43:45 Operator: JAL Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description 0 70248 70251 0 70263 Dept Amount Total for Dept 450 ASSOC. OF METRO. MUNIC BERNSTEIN, BARRY FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE SURVEY MILEAGE /MEALS PARTS /SUPPLIES MINNESOTA DEPT OF ECON 4TH QTR UNEMPLOYMENT NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY TARGET SUPPLIES Total for Dept 451 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JAN 12, 21 Total for Dept 461 0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL Total for Dept 462 RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI ENVIRONM ENVIRONM SOLID WA 1,936.69* 40.00 85.97 10.10 17.07 102.51 38.97 294.62* 16.63 190.00 206.63* 332.60 332.60* ANOKA COUNTY TREASURER VIBRATORY PLOW RENTAL FORESTRY 1,320.00 Total for Dept 463 1,320.00* O KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN GENERAL OBLIGATIOIN BOND DEBT SER 1,306.65 Total for Dept 470 1,306.65* 70265 M 0 0 0 0 0 11111259 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI DNR WATERS IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS US LINK VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENT XCEL ENERGY UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE WATER APPROPRIATION FEE PRINTING MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY GLASS /PLUGS /MUFFS /TAPE /G MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER Total for Dept 494 70265 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE 70248 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES 70257 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIAT PARTS /SERVICE Total for Dept 495 O ANOKA COUNTY O ARNT CONSTRUCTION, INC 0 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN O QUICKSILVER EXPRESS CO 70254 REED BUSINESS INFORMAT 0 RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. O SPRINGSTED, INC. 0 T.K.D.A. T IN TAX /SPEC ASSESS /TIF DITCH /POND CLEANING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ADVERTISING DELIVERY SERVICE ADVERTISING CONTRACTOR /WEST SHADOW P GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS '03 SURFACE WATER /DECEMB Total for Dept 499 WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER SEWER SEWER SEWER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER 251.33 4,072.50 38.20 50.03 132.04 312.36 79.40 4,935.86* 251.33 5.29 7,661.52 7,918.14* 8,731.68 101,783.34 4,770.00 33.25 39.20 1,328.60 39,297.03 6,000.00 42,535.37 204,518.47* O KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE /DEC PANATONI 217.00 Total for Dept 525 217.00* Date: 02/03/2004 Time 08:43:46 Operator: JAL Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE /DEC LEGACY A 387.50 Total for Dept 530 387.50* Grand Total 349,548.81* • • Centennial Fire District Check Register 2/4/2004 The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval: DATE CHECK# NAME 2/3/2004 14097 2/3/2004 14098 2/3/2004 14099 2/3/2004 14100 2/3/2004 14101 2/3/2004 14102 2/3/2004 14103 2/3/2004 14104 2/3/2004 14105 2/3/2004 14106 2/3/2004 14107 2/3/2004 14108 2/3/2004 14109 2/3/2004 14110 2/3/2004 14111 2/3/2004 14112 2/3/2004 14113 2/3/2004 14114 2/3/2004 14115 2/3/2004 14116 2/3/2004 14117 Amoco Oil Company Bob Stafki Centennial Utilities CenterPoint Energy Comcast Connexus Energy Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Fire Instructors Assn. of Minnesota Grainger McLeod USA Metro Fire Milo Bennett Orkin Exterminating Public Safety Center, Inc. Rolltex Computers Verizon Wireless Viking Office Products Zep Manufacturing Company Centennial Firefighters Relief Assn. City of Lino Lakes Access Cardiosystems 1 of 1 ACCOUNT 42100 - Fuel and Lube 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42251 - Station 1 - Gas 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 42180 - Office Supplies 42252 - Station 1 - Electric 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 42220 - Travel, Conference, School 42130 - Equipment Expense 42240 - Telephone 42130 - Equipment Expense 42180 - Office Supplies 42110 - Other Maintenance 42130 - Equipment Expense 42180 - Office Supplies 42240 - Telephone 42180 - Office Supplies 42230 - Cleaning Supplies 43010 - Relief Association 43030 - Common Area Charges 45600 - Donated Items Expense AMOUNT 150.14 297.00 532.37 1,215.54 95.00 385.84 2,585.01 2,118.29 269.87 349.15 812.55 64.69 56.23 551.26 74.44 191.51 62.66 43.67 5,750.00 5,206.00 13.015.00 $33,826.22 • • • STAFF ORIGNINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: AGENDA ITEM 1B Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk February 9, 2004 Consider Approval of Resolution No. 04 -26, Application for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for Lino Lakes Lions Club Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: The Lino Lakes Lions Club is conducting a fundraising prime rib dinner on Saturday, March 6, 2004 at St. Joseph Catholic Church, 171 Elm Street. The Lino Lakes Lions Club is requesting approval of a 1 to 4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License application. The license is necessary to allow the Lions Club to mix and dispense liquor that will be served as part of the dinner. Applicants are required to submit an application to the city for approval at least 30 days prior to the event. In this case, time does not allow and the Lions Club is requesting the 30 -day requirement be waived. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Division will accept the application after city council approval, review it and upon approval return it to the Lions Club in time for the event. City policy requires a background investigation each time a permit or license application is received. The Lino Lakes Police Department conducted an investigation on February 5, 2004 and found no reason to deny the application. A copy of the application and a copy of the certificate of liquor liability insurance are on file in the city clerk's office. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -26, application for the 1 to 4 day temporary on -sale liquor license. 2. Deny Resolution. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -26. APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE (Organization or location limited to 3 permits in a 12 month period) • . +.A YA,401T411VY1 NAME OP ORGAt+&IZAfl N L, Kin LAk -t,'S" Li dly DATE ORGANIZED '3^ (9- 7-3 TAX EXEMPT NUMBER e "-k^ 730(.039.. S'1TtEET ADDRESS 84.2 t'1 a. pt_e T. CITY t_, tau L4 tc cf STATE IM K1 ZIP CODE jb ! ¢- NAME OF PERSON' MAKING APPLICATION ii-A.,.,,. Zr- P . s 7 / s/s's BUSINESS PHONE (fr) 784. • 7522 HOME PHONE 6 9) /80 ^ 4974 - DATES LIQUOR MIX HE SOLD tl to 4 days), a : i.42-‘,:1 - TYPE OF ORGANIZATION ,_ CLUB n CHARITABLE ❑ RELIGIOUS 0 OTHER.NON ROFTT OR , NAME eS Gvt s ,( ADDRESS o2 f ADDRESS 7.�r3 57 t IkpLe Sr. Lote LA r...c• , py1J , /�/ CJC ■ c LA-r\<- <-'e - 1L ORQA TIOONNOFFFFICE1t'S3,tt�Iti t_ tA) lete C Sv.c� ORGANIZA► ON OFFICER'S NAIA. COLc•e—. t.J:`.t C Tied - S) ADDRESS 7?, Of re r • c L.A.-1 ,a- L. L. Location where license 1,411 is used. If an oltdoor arts, desen L_, L . N.IKt wt4 Will the applicant -contact intoxicating liquor services? If so, giro die name eed ogress of dreLignor lieu providing the service. WiII the applicant carry liquor liability insuranco? if so, the camas' s name and wan of coverag (NOTE: Inroranoe is not nttmdatory) �� APPROVAL APPLICATION M(JST BB APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE. SUBMITTING TO LIQUOR CONTROL CITY/COUNTY CTTY 1 hE AMOUNT DATE FEE PAID SIGNATURE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY OFFICIAL DATE APPROVED LICENSE DATES APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR. NOTE: Do not separate these two parts, send both parts to the address above and the orlghtnl signed by tbls dk► ilon • will be returned as the license. Submit to the Clty or County at least 30 days Worn the event. PS-09079(8/95) • • CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA RESOLUTION NO. 04 -26 RESOLUTION APPROVING LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB APPLICATION FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute, Section 340, allows the city council to issue a temporary on -sale liquor license to a non - profit organization in connection with a social event sponsored by the licensee and held within the city limits; and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lions Club has submitted an application to hold a fundraising event at St. Joseph Catholic Church on March 6, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lioris Club has paid the required fee, and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has conducted an investigation of the Lino Lakes Lions Club, and WHEREAS, the Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Division requires the application be approved by the City of Lino Lakes City Council before submitting for approval to the liquor control board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the request of the Lino Lakes Lions Club for a temporary on -sale liquor license. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of February, 2004 ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 4A Ann J. Blair, City Clerk February 9, 2004 Consider Adoption of Resolution No. 04 -25, Authorizing New Wine and Beer License, Mansetti's Pizza, Spirit Hills Center, 6511 Ware Road (3 / 5) Simple Majority An application has been submitted by James and Michele Szyplinski, d/b /a Michele's Pizza Ltd., for a new on -sale wine and beer license for the purpose of opening a pizza and pasta restaurant located at 6511 Ware Road in the Spirit Hills Center. The application is complete, the related fees have been paid, including investigation fees, and insurance information has been provided to the City as required. The Lino Lakes Police Depaitiuent has conducted a background investigation relative to this application as required and found no information on the principal applicants which would give a specific reason for denial of the application. As you may know, on -sale licenses granted by municipalities are regulated under Minnesota State Statute 340A. For many years, M.S.A. 340A.413 provided restrictions on the number of on -sale licenses which cities may issue. While this provision is still in place, the omnibus liquor bill of the 2003 legislative session added section M.S.A. 340A.404, which exempted certain establishments from the limitations. These exempted establishments include hotels, restaurants, and a few other limited groups. A copy of these portions of the two statutes is attached, as well as a short House Research memo on this topic. The effect of the new provision which exempts certain establishments all but does away with on -sale liquor icense limitations for municipalities. Mansetti's Pizza qualifies as a "restaurant" under the statutory definition. The owners hope to complete inspections and be open for business in approximately three weeks. The applicant will be in attendance at the Council meeting Monday evening to answer any questions the Council may have. In accordance with the City Code Section 701, Liquor Licensing, this business requires City approval to grant wine and beer licenses, and this business qualifies for issuance of these licenses. The applicant is fully aware license approval is subject to all the provisions and conditions of the laws of the city, state and of the federal government. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -25 Authorizing Issuance of new Wine and Beer Licenses for Mansetti's Pizza as recommended by Staff. 2. Deny Resolution No. 04 -25. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04-25 APPROVING ISSUANCE OF NEW ON -SALE WINE AND BEER LICENSE FOR MANSETTI'S PIZZA, 6511 WARE ROAD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes met at its regularly scheduled meeting on February 9, 2004, and; WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council discussed approval of a new on -sale wine and beer license for Mansetti's Pizza located at 6511 Ware Road, and; WHEREAS, the Police Department of the City of Lino Lakes has conducted an investigation of the applicants, and; WHEREAS, Mansetti's Pizza is in compliance with City City Code Section 701 Concerning Liquor Licensing, and qualifies for such license and; WHEREAS, the applicant has provided proof of insurance as required and paid the necessary fees; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the new on -sale wine and beer license for Mansetti's subject to all the fees, provisions and conditions of the laws of the city, state and of the federal government. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004. ATTEST: Ann J. Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor • htt13://www.revisor.leg.st emu' http: f iwww. revisor.Ieg. state, mn. us /cgi -bin jgetstatchap. pl == 3401.413 3401.413 Restrictions on the number of intoxicating liquor licenses that may be issued. Subdivision 1. On -sale licenses. No on -sale intoxicating liquor license may be issued in any city except as provided in this section in excess of the following limits: (1) in cities of the first class, one license for every 1,500 population, up to 200 licenses; (2) in cities of the second class, not more than 18 icenses plus one for every 2,500 population over 45,000; (3) in cities of the third class, not more than 12 licenses; (4) in cities of the fourth class, including cities whose acts of incorporation were repealed by Laws 1973, chapter 123, article V, section 5, not more than seven licenses; (5) in statutory cities of 5,000 to 10,000 population, not more than six licenses; (6) in statutory cities of 2,500 to 5,000 population, not 'fiSFP 7i!"POIRPR! • Wednesday, Feb 04, 2004 02:51 PM • wddre http://www.revisonleg,state,mn.usicgi-binfgetstatchap.pl *determination has been made by that date, subdivision 4 remains in effect. Laws 2003, First Special Session chapter 19, article *2, section 79, subdivision 3. == 340A.404 340A.404 Intoxicating liquor; on -sale licenses. Subdivision 1. Cities. (a) A city may issue an on -sale intoxicating liquor license to the following establishments located within its jurisdiction: (1) hotels; (2) restaurants; (3) bowling centers; (4) clubs or congressionally chartered veterans organizations with the approval of the commissioner, provided that the organization has been in existence for at least three years and liquor sales will only be to members and bona fide guests; (5) sports facilities located on land owned by the Metropolitan Sports Commission; and (6) exclusive liquor stores. • Wednesday, Feb 04, 2004 02:50 PM • http:/,/www.revisor.leg,s t ite.mri.0 ' -j GaCIG ^ n - 1 earn °�. 1 ^writes �' x dress y http / /www,revisor,leg,state,mn usjcgi bn /getstatchap,pl 6 1 Subd. 23. Person. "Person" has the meaning given it in section 645.44, subdivision 7. Subd. 24. Population. "Population" is determined by the most recent federal decennial census or a special census taken under law. Subd. 25. Restaurant. "Restaurant" is an establishment, other than a hotel, under the control of a single proprietor or manager, where meals are regularly prepared on the premises and served at tables to the general public, and having minimum seating capacity for guests as prescribed by the ppropriate license issuing authority. Subd. 26. Retail. "Retail" is sale for consumption. Subd. 27. Table or sparkling wine. "Table or sparkling wine" is a beverage made without rectification or fortification and containing not more than 25 percent of alcohol by volume and made by the fermentation of grapes, grape juice, other fruits, or honey. Subd. 27a. Theater. "Theater" means a building containing an auditorium in which live dramatic, musical, dance, or literary performances are regularly presented to holders of tickets for those performances. • Wednesday, Feb 04, 2004 02:51 PM HOUSE RESEARCH • • • Short Subjects John Williams June 2003 The 2:00 a.m. On -Sale Closing Hour and Other Liquor Law Changes The legislature in 2003 made some of the most far - reaching changes in liquor kw since Sunday liquor was legalized more than 30 years ago, including allowing on -sale of alcoholic beverages until 2:00 a.m. On -sale closing The 2003 omnibus liquor bill moves back from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. the hour hours at which on -sale of intoxicating liquor and 3.2 beer must cease. ( "On- sale" is sale for consumption on the premises only.) The same change is made for the hour at which establishments with "consumption and display" permits (bottle clubs or set -ups) must stop consumption on the premises. The effective date of the change is July 1, 2003. Local authority to set other hours The 1:00 a.m. hour had been in effect since the 1940s. Although the hour set in law is often referred to as the "closing hour," state law does not require establishments to close their doors at that hour but only to stop selling alcohol. A requirement to actually close may be included in local ordinances. The bill made no changes in the hours for off -sale establishments (package stores). Under present law, cities and counties may set more restrictive hours for alcoholic beverages than state law allows. So local governments have the right to retain the 1:00 a.m. closing hour for establishments within their jurisdiction. Cities cannot allow any on -sale of alcohol later than 2:00 a.m. A city that has already adopted an ordinance that sets a 1:00 a.m. closing time will retain that closing time unless it decides to repeal or amend its ordinance. A city that enacts a 1:00 a.m. ordinance before July 1 will prevent the new closing time from taking effect within its jurisdiction. A city could still adopt such an ordinance after July 1, but it would mean rolling back the closing hour from 2:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Any local action to set on -sale hours that differ from state law must apply equally to intoxicating liquor and 3.2 beer. Permits Local license limits Brewpubs selling at off -sale In order to continue on -sales until 2:00 a.m., a licensed establishment must obtain a permit from the state Department of Public Safety. The permit is in addition to the establishment's on -sale license issued by the city or county. The permit is valid for a year. The fee for on -sale retailers of intoxicating liquor is based on the establishment's gross receipts from alcohol sales in the previous year: ■ Up to $100,000 in gross receipts, $200 ■ Over $100,000 but not over $500,000 in gross receipts, $500 ■ Over $500,000 in gross receipts, $600 For intoxicating liquor establishments that have been in business less than a year, 3.2 beer licensees, and consumption and display permit holders, the fee is $200. The legislature enacted the permit requirement in order to raise money to partly offset the cost of additional troopers for the State Patrol. A study by the Revenue Department will determine if the new hours generate at least $3.85 million annually in new state tax revenue. If the study shows that they do, the permit requirement will be repealed beginning July 1, 2005. For many years state law has limited the number of on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses that cities could issue. First -class cities (Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth), for instance, were allowed to issue one license for every 1,500 persons up to a maximum of 200. Cities wanting to issue more licenses than state law allowed had to come to the legislature for authorization. The 2003 omnibus liquor bill exempted on -sale licenses to restaurants and hotels from these limits. Since almost all licenses for which legislative approval had been sought in past years fall into one of these categories, the result is to all but end the practice of seeking additional licenses from the legislature. Special liquor laws to allow licenses to establishments that couldn't be licensed under general law for other reasons are likely to continue. The omnibus liquor bill also allowed "bewpubs" (restaurants that brew beer on the premises) to sell their products in bottles for consumption off the premises. Sales can only be made in 64 -ounce bottles known as "growlers" that must be sealed on the premises. Brewpubs can sell no more than half their annual maximum output of 3,500 barrels at off-sale, up to a maximum of 500 barrels. Their off -sale hours would be the same as for package stores. For more information: Contact legislative analyst John Williams at 651- 296 -5045. The Research Department of the Minnesota House of Representatives is a nonpartisan office providing legislative, legal, and information services to the entire House. House Research Department 1 600 State Office Building 1 St. Paul, MN 55155 1 651 - 296 -6753 1 www.house.mn /hrd /hrd.htm • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: AGENDA ITEM 4b Dan Tesch, Director of Administration 9 February 2004 Consider Salary Increases for Non -union Personnel for 2004 3/5 BACKGROUND: There are ten non -union city employees. The majority of this group is made up of the city's senior management team, and no employees in this group are compensated for overtime. Staff is recommending that these employees receive the same 2004 annual adjustment currently being negotiated by the city's four unions: 2 %. In addition, staff is recommending market adjustments to salaries for positions that are below the average for similar size metro area cities (population 10,000 — 25,000): Public Safety Director, 2.65 %; and Public Works Superintendent, 2.9% Community Development Director, 1.17 %, Director of Administration 0.53 %, Office Manager in Public Safety 3.66% and City Clerk 0.94 %. None of these positions received a market adjustment in 2003. This amount keeps us within budget. This approach to salary implementation is the approach we have taken for several years, and is the approach are taking as we continue to negotiate our four union contracts. Non -union employees traditionally receive the same health care benefits as unionized employees. For 2004 this is 100% coverage of the premium for single coverage and $660.28 plus one -half of any increase in family coverage. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the proposed 2004 non -union salary increases. 2. Decline to approve the proposed 2004 non -union salary increases. 3. Return to staff for further review and/or action. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Option #1: Approve the proposed 2004 non -union salary increases. J: \Ism ith \exempt \GRS H E ET03.doc 200400.00% CO d U) O ° C s 2Q c•I _ C L E O a)�. o C Co N a) 0 IF d +' O L O CC Q O Y N Co C .� a) D 0 < CO N CC 0 U) C O n. 0 C 0 a 0 0 0 0 ; O o o 0 N N N N N N N z N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q o 0 CC) O O O O I- CO Z CO (9 O O O O r- 1.0 O O) N O N O O O M O O co O CO O co O CO O co O CO O co O CO O co O co O O O o N o O O O O O 0 CO 0 Co 0 CO 0 CO 0 CO o CO 0 CO 0 CO 0 CO 0 CO 0 O r o O co O 1.40 %I O O r O O O O O f- O O Co O CO O CO O CO .c...;,,,,, CO O Co O CO O Co O CO %E 0 Ct 00 (O •c ... ' t 0 CO 0 T o T O o IC) 0 N- o) CO (� 3061 O Co ti N- CO N CO f- 588 - = CC) O O N- CO O N 252 581 N T.- 1- 881 N - d' (C N r 175 O) O CO CO IDir Public Safety IRec Sups 2 'Superintendent !Finance Director 1 IDir Public Service loom Dev Director 'Director Adminis 1 'City Administrator 10ff Mgr Pub Safeil City Clerk • AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Pecchia, Public Safety Director / Police Chief C. C. MEETING DATE: February 9, 2004 TOPIC: Accepting Donation from Centennial Firefighters Relief Association to purhcase a Command Van VOTE: 3/5 (Simply Majority) BACKGROUND At the January 12, 2004 City Council meeting, the City Council approved the request to enter into an agreement with the Centennial Fire District to purchase a Command Vehicle from the City of Elk River. The purpose of Resolution No. 04 -20 is to publicly thank the Centennial Firefighters Relief Association for the generous donation to purchase the Command Vehicle, as well as formally accept these funds. • OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -20 accepting the donation of $5,000 from the Centennial Firefighters Relief Association for purchase of a Command Vehicle. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 - 20 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATIONS FROM THE CENTENNIAL FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF ASSOCIATION TO PURCHASE A COMMAND VEHICLE WHEREAS, the City of Elk River has a command vehicle that they want to sell. This vehicle is a 1981 Chevrolet that has been converted to a command vehicle complete with desks, radios and storage. The vehicle has very low mileage and an all aluminum body; and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Police Department worked with the Centennial Fire District on purchasing this vehicle and was previously approved to enter into a joint venture. This vehicle would provide a place to work on larger incidents and could also be used for emergency operations, police tactical operations, community events, longer fire investigations, etc. WHEREAS, the monies will be appropriated to the General Fund in the following manner: Increase Revenue - Contributions Increase Expenditures- Police Capital Outlay $5,000.00 $5,000.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lino Lakes City Council members, do hereby accept the $5,000.00 to purchase the command vehicle and wishes to express its gratitude to the Centennial Firefighters Relief Association for their generous donation. Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor • AGENDA ITEM 7A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: February 9, 2004 TOPIC: Environmental Board Goals BACKGROUND: The Environmental Board annually sets goals as a part of their work program. The Board is requesting the City Council acceptance of their goals for 2004. The Board at their December meeting adopted the following goals: 1. Continue to work with landowners, developers and all stakeholders and agencies to buffer and protect the wetland area behind Lino Lakes Elementary School. 2. Expand the Wildland urban Interface project to work with Centennial Fire District in implementing the Fire Wise program starting with Pine Vista subdivision. • 3. Work with Lino Lakes Park Board in the planning of a new open space and trails plan. • 4. Petition to have the sunset clause removed from the Peltier Lake slow, no -wake ordinance, and continue to monitor the Heron Rookery and the Northern 1/3 of the lake. 5. Promote and "showcase" (example: Legacy at Woods Edge) the use of native plantings in formal and informal settings. 6. Promote public education and provide handouts on such subjects as invasive, non- invasive species, where to buy native plants, environmental landscaping, composting, organic gardening, promoting and protecting wildlife habitat. 7. Pursue having Lino Lakes certified as a Community Wildlife Habitat through the National Wildlife Federation. 8. Partner with local Master Gardeners for a series of public education seminars. 9. Do a special project with Blue Heron Elementary 10. Make contact with similar boards from other cities. OPTIONS: • 1. Approve adoption of Resolution No. 04 -21, approving the Environmental Board goals for 2004 2. Refer back to the Environmental Board for further Consideration RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending adoption of Resolution No. 04- 21 approving the Environmental Board goals for 2004 • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -21 RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD GOALS FOR 2004 WHEREAS, , The City of Lino Lakes has an established Environmental Board, AND WHEREAS, ; The purpose of the Environmental Board is to provide aid and advice to the council in its efforts to encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between people and their environment ; to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and stimulate the health and welfare of people; to enrich the understanding of ecological systems and natural resources important to the city; to advise the City in the use and management of its natural resources in order to preserve and enhance the environmental amenities for present and future residents, and to ensure a lasting quality of life within the city, AND WHEREAS,; The Environmental Board approved the following 2004 goals at their December, 2003 meeting: 1. Continue to work with landowners, developers and all stakeholders and agencies to buffer and protect the wetland area behind Lino Lakes Elementary School. 2. Expand the Wildland urban Interface project to work with Centennial Fire District in implementing the Fire Wise program starting with Pine Vista subdivision. 3. Work with Lino Lakes Park Board in the planning of a new open space and trails plan. 4. Petition to have the sunset clause removed from the Peltier Lake slow, no -wake ordinance, and continue to monitor the Heron Rookery and the Northern 1/3 of the lake. 5. Promote and "showcase" (example: Legacy at Woods Edge) the use of native plantings in formal and informal settings. 6. Promote public education and provide handouts on such subjects as invasive, non- invasive species, where to buy native plants, environmental landscaping, composting, organic gardening, promoting and protecting wildlife habitat. 7. Pursue having Lino Lakes certified as a Community Wildlife Habitat through the National Wildlife Federation. 8. Partner with local Master Gardeners for a series of public education seminars. 9. Do a special project with Blue Heron Elementary • • • 10. Make contact with similar boards from other cities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the 2004 goals of the Lino Lakes Environmental Board be adopted. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of February 2004. Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor • • AGENDA ITEM 7B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala C. C. MEETING DATE: February 9, 2004 TOPIC: Resolution 04 -19 Making a Negative Declaration on the need for and Environmental Impact Statement ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The Hartford Group, in conjunction with the City of Lino Lakes, is proposing to develop the City's "Village" Master Plan. The "Legacy at Woods Edge" project is a mixed use development, located in the southeast quadrant of I -35W and Lake Drive (County State Aid Highway 23). The project includes upto approximately 350,000 square feet of retail, service and office uses and 450 multi - family residential units. Also incorporated into the site development is the YMCA. The project, as proposed, required the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The City retained the services of Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., (SEH) to prepare the EAW. The City Council authorized distribution of the EAW on November 10, 2003. The required 30 day public comment period ended on the December 24, 2003. Comments were received from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT), Anoka County Department of Parks and Recreation, Metropolitan Council, Anoka County Highway Department, Army Corps of Engineers, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (Mn /DNR). Agency comments and the City's responses are included in the attached Record of Decision prepared by the City's Consultant Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. After the public comment period, it is the City's responsibility to decide if it has enough information to determine if the project will cause significant environmental effects. If it will not cause such effects, the City makes a "negative declaration" meaning that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not necessary. If the review process reveals, in the judgement of the City, that the project will cause significant environmental effects, the City makes a "positive declaration" meaning an EIS is necessary. As setforth in the Record of Decision, adequate information has been presented to determine that the proposed project will not cause significant environmental effects and therefore an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not necessary. The City's Environmental Board reviewed the draft Record of Decision on January 21, 2004 and recommended approval with the addition of a sentence to the Construction • Impacts section related to minimizing impacts to residences along Marshan Lane. Their comments have been incorporated into the final document. Representatives from Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. will be available at the council meeting to address comments. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 04 -19 making a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 04 -19 2. Record of Decision • • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -19 RESOLUTION MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WHEREAS, MN Rules 4410 establishes the requirements for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EAW); and WHEREAS, the City initiated an environmental review to determine if the proposed Legacy at Woods Edge has the potential for significant environmental effects, as required by MN Rules, Chapter 4410.4300, Subpart 14.; and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following specific findings of fact: 1. The City of Lino Lakes is the responsible governmental unit for the EAW. 2. An EAW was prepared and the City Council approved its distribution with Resolution 03 -204. The EAW was distributed according to the requirements of MN Rules 4410 and its availability was published in the EQB Monitor on November 24, 2003. 3. The public comment period ended on December 24, 2003. 4. The City has reviewed comments on the EAW and has prepared responses to these comments, included in the Record of Decision, dated February 9, 2004 5. The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority indicates that this project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 6. In considering the type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects, there will be no significant environmental effects from the project. 7. The project involves no related developments, connected actions, or phased actions as defined by MN Rules 4410. 8. The City Council must make either a negative declaration or a positive declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council makes a negative declaration regarding the need for an EIS, meaning that an EIS is not needed for the Legacy at Woods Edge project as currently proposed. • Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of February, 2004 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk • • Record of Decision LEGACY AT WOOD'S EDGE DEVELOPMENT Findings of Fact and Conclusions Town Center Parkway and Lake Drive (CSAH 23)- In the southeast quadrant of the I -35W /Lake Drive Interchange In the City of Lino Lakes Anoka County, Minnesota Prepared for: City of Lino Lakes Prepared by: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. February 9, 2004 • • Legacy at Wood's Edge Record of Decision City of Lino Lakes February 2004 FINDINGS OF FACT ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND The City of Lino Lakes is the responsible governmental unit (RGU) for this project. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for this project as prescribed by environmental review requirements. Lino Lakes prepared the EAW. The EAW was filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (MEQB) and circulated for review and comments to the required EAW distribution list. A Notice of Availability was published in the EQB Monitor on November 24, 2003. The thirty -day comment period closed on December 24, 2003. Written comments received from agencies and citizens are summarized and responded to in this report in the section "EAW Comments and Responses ". PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of mixed -use development on approximately 65 -acres of land in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. The development will include 348,292 square feet of commercial /office, 450 multi - family residential units, and 38,000 square feet of civic uses (YMCA facility). The proposed site plan incorporates the above square footages and number of residential units into a series of buildings that have been located to minimize disruption to existing natural features such as wetlands and mature trees, as well as to maximize visibility and create a quality mixed -use development. The mixed -use development will inspire an energetic neighborhood and will provide a number of living, working, and service opportunities within the project area. The project includes an internal street network that provides access to the retail /office, residential, and civic buildings. Town Center Parkway, which currently provides access to the Lino Lakes City Hall, will serve as a collector street and will provide access to Lake Drive (Anoka County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 23) at the southwest corner of the site. The proposed local roadways will also provide corridors for public water, sanitary sewer, and other utilities necessary to serve the development. The clustering of structures has been employed in the proposed development for the purpose of preserving and enhancing sensitive land features on the site and for providing parkland and open space. The proposed plan has the added benefit of avoiding wetland impacts on the site and of minimizing impacts to a grove of mature • Legacy at Wood's Edge Record of Decision City of Lino Lakes February 2004 trees located along the eastern edge of the site. A proposed storm water treatment system will provide an efficient infiltration and retention system for storm water runoff from the site. Storm water ponds, vegetative grass filter strips, and infiltration cells will be utilized to retain and treat runoff from the site. These features will also provide aesthetic value and green space to the visually attractive integrated neighborhood. Initial site grading and construction of the Legacy at Wood's Edge Development is anticipated to begin in 2004. Full development of the site is expected to be complete in 2 to 3 years. Criteria for Determining the Significance of Environmental Effect Minnesota Rule 4410.170, subp.7 specifies the following criteria to be used in deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not considered necessary for this project based on the criteria listed below. 1. Type, Extent, and Reversibility of Environmental Effects The EAW and this Findings of Fact summarize the type and extent of impacts to the surrounding environment. Alternatives to avoid potential impacts on the environment were considered and evaluated during the development of the site plan and prior to the preparation of the EAW. The proposed site plan also includes design features to mitigate potential social, economic, and environmental impacts. The following is a summary of the major findings of the EAW regarding potential social, economic, and environmental impacts as a result of the proposed mixed -use development project. Compatibility with Local Plans The project is consistent with local and regional plans, which includes the following: • City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan o Land Use Plan o Sanitary Sewer Plan o Transportation Plan o Surface Water Management Plan • City of Lino Lakes Subdivision and Platting Ordinance • City of Lino Lakes Shoreland and Floodplain Ordinances • Village Development Master Plan, 1997 • Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide • City of Lino Lakes Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development • Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Program Legacy at Wood's Edge Record of Decision City of Lino Lakes February 2004 The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the project area for mixed use development and includes the Master Plan for this site, developed in 1997. The City's Comprehensive Plan specifically states the following: "The southeast quadrant of the I -35W /Lake Drive interchange represents the Lino Lakes Village area. The Village is intended to integrate a mixture of commercial, medium and high density residential and public land uses in an attractive and cohesive design." The City's Zoning Ordinance provides for mixed -use development through the use of the Planned Unit Development process. Additionally, the Village Master Plan included design guidelines that are being implemented as part of the proposed development. Wildlife and Vegetation Impacts A search of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Natural Heritage Database for rare plant and animal species or other significant natural features known to occur within an approximate one -mile radius of the proposed project was conducted. The results of the database search show four known occurrences of rare species or animal aggregation sites in the search area. A Bald Eagle nesting site has been documented east of the project site within the Wargo Nature Center, which is approximately 34-mile east of the proposed development. No Construction is proposed within close proximity of the nest. The Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report was completed in 1999. Additional biological field investigations were conducted on July 9, 2003, to determine if any occurrences of rare plant species are present on the site. The results of the biological field survey conclude that there were no rare plant populations encountered and that the proposed development will not directly impact any rare plant species. Erosion and Sedimentation The preliminary grading estimates have been refined since the publication of the EAW. Current estimates indicate that approximately 69,000 cubic yards of material will be cut and approximately 150,000 cubic yards of fill material will be required resulting in a net difference of approximately 81,000 cubic yards of fill being required for the proposed project. All erosion /sediment control measures and BMP's described in the EAW remain the same and will be further documented in the NPDES Phase II permit for the project. Wetland Impacts The proposed site plan has incorporated avoidance measures to ensure no wetland impacts or alterations of any wetlands will occur as a result of the Legacy at Wood's Edge Development. Legacy at Wood's Edge Record of Decision City of Lino Lakes February 2004 Water Related Land Use (Shoreland and Floodplain Impacts) The southern and eastern portions of the site are located within the designated shoreland zoning districts for Marshan Lake and George Watch Lake. The City has adopted a shoreland and a floodplain ordinance that regulates development within these designated areas. Furthermore, the DNR has approved these ordinances. The proposed Legacy at Wood's Edge Development will fully comply with the standards of these ordinances. The proposed project does not lie within a delineated 100 -year floodplain. Water Quality Impacts A surface water management plan for the development is being proposed that will retain storm water runoff on -site for the purpose of improving water quality and incorporate infiltration to reduce surface discharge and promote recharge of the groundwater. To comply with City and Rice Creek Watershed District requirements, the surface water management plan has addressed rate control by utilizing proposed ponds and existing wetlands for live storage. The development proposes to construct a drainage system within all the street improvements and parking areas to convey runoff to proposed ponding areas and infiltration cells (green space or ' underground storage chambers). Subsurface chamber technology takes advantage of the soil's inherent filtration and renovation capabilities to store and treat storm water runoff while providing the flexibility to plan for additional buildings and green space. To maximize pollutant removal efficiencies, the water quality control structures will be designed and constructed according to NURP, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) Phase II permit, the City of Lino Lakes, and Rice Creek Watershed District standards. Based on a water quality analysis, the proposed development will maintain adequate area for the retention (ponds) and infiltration (natural and underground chambers) of surface water runoff. Before construction can proceed, both the City of Lino Lakes and Rice Creek Watershed District must issue permits to satisfy surface water management regulations. The project will eliminate two existing infiltration basins along the north side of Town Center Parkway. These basins will be replaced elsewhere on the site. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II permit will be required for this project. Erosion prevention and sediment control best management practices (BMP's) will be used in accordance with the NPDES Phase II permit. An erosion control plan will be developed for the site and will likely include temporary and permanent erosion control measures such as timely revegetation of disturbed areas, hay bales, silt fencing, flotation silt curtains, and sedimentation ponds. • • Legacy at Wood's Edge Record of Decision City of Lino Lakes February 2004 Hazardous Waste A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was completed for the site in May 2003. The assessment revealed the following environmental conditions in connection with the site: • Two above - ground storage tanks, likely holding petroleum products, are currently located and in use along the north end of the site; • An area of cars and miscellaneous vehicles are located on the northeastern portion of the site; and • The northern portion of the site has been used as a sandblasting facility for approximately 25 years. The aboveground storage tanks will be removed as part of the development and remedial action will be taken if necessary. Further evaluation of the soils in the vicinity of the aboveground storage tanks and the vehicle storage area will be conducted to determine if any petroleum releases have occurred or whether past land uses may have adversely impacted the soils on the site. The proposed commercial and residential developments are not expected to have petroleum or oil storage tanks. The land uses associated with the commercial development are expected to be retail and /or restaurant types of uses. Traffic AM and PM Peak Hour trip generation rates were developed for the proposed development as well as the existing facilities (City Hall complex, Fairview Clinic, and Lino Lakes State Bank). Trips to /from each building were assigned to the street system within the development. This provided a tabulation of traffic volumes at various locations within the development, as well as at the intersection of Town Center Parkway and Lake Drive. According to this analysis, the Peak Hour traffic volume is 1,155 trips, which occurs from 4:30 -5:30 pm. Based on the traffic analysis, a concept transportation improvement plan was developed for the Town Center Parkway and Lake Drive intersection. On Town Center Parkway, the plan includes three outbound lanes to separate left turn, through, and right turning traffic and also includes two inbound travel lanes. Signalization of this intersection would also be necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service and provided a controlled pedestrian crossing. According to the 2020 Traffic Volume Forecast in the Lino Lakes Transportation Plan, traffic volumes on Lake Drive are anticipated to increase to over 17,000 trips per day. Regardless of the proposed development, improvements to Lake Drive are expected in the future. However, to accommodate the full development of the Legacy at Wood's Edge Development, several additional improvements to Lake Drive are being proposed. The concept transportation plan has proposed Legacy at Wood's Edge Record of Decision City of Lino Lakes February 2004 the construction of two southbound left turn lanes between the intersection of Town Center Parkway and the I -35W bridge. Furthermore, traffic signals at Town Center Parkway and both ramps to I -35W are anticipated. To signalize the south ramp intersection, the existing off ramp and on ramp intersections, which are now separated, need to be aligned to a single intersection, which would require the reconstruction of approximately 400 -feet of the northbound on ramp. Ultimately, the capacity on Lake Drive past the Town Center Parkway intersection will need to be expanded. This will require additional lanes on Lake Drive and the reconstruction of the I -35W bridge. Turn lanes will be necessary at the interchange ramps to accommodate future traffic as well as full build -out traffic from the Legacy at Wood's Edge Development. In the interim, between the reconstruction of the bridge over I -35W and the development of portions or all of the proposed development, an intermediate intersection needs to be developed that has been described above. The traffic volumes for the year 2020 along with full build -out of the proposed development, have been used in a traffic simulation model. Results of the traffic simulation as it relates to the regional transportation system have been shared and discussed with Mn /DOT and the Anoka County Highway Department. This information will also be shared with the Met Council. • Construction Impacts • Temporary construction related impacts such as dust, odors, and noise have been considered. There are a relatively small number of residences located immediately south of the site that could experience temporary impacts resulting from construction activities. However, considerable effort will be made to minimize impacts on these residences. Dust is likely to be generated by equipment during times of construction. Dust generation will be minimized by enforcing best management practices, which may include: 1) minimizing the periods and extent of areas being exposed or graded; 2) watering construction areas and haul roads during periods of high winds or high levels of construction activity; 3) minimizing the use of vehicles on unpaved surfaces; and 4) covering and /or spraying material piles and truck loads. Temporary odors may be generated by exhaust from engines engaged in construction activities. All equipment will be properly equipped to control odor emissions. Noise will be generated during the construction of the public improvements (e.g. roads, sewer, water) and residential and commercial /office buildings in the development. City ordinance regulates the daytime hours of construction to minimize noise impacts to sensitive receptors on adjacent properties. Noise mitigation is not proposed at this time because construction noise will be • Legacy at Wood's Edge Record of Decision City of Lino Lakes February 2004 temporary and all City and County roads in the area are exempt from state noise standards. Noise levels along the local roadways are not anticipated to exceed State noise standards, nor are they anticipated to be greater than noise levels that are commonly experienced within a residential and commercial area. Furthermore, adequate building setbacks and acoustical site planning techniques have been incorporated into the site plan to shield more sensitive land uses from noise impacts. Visual Impacts Only routine visual impacts associated with construction activities and typical urban development are anticipated by the proposed development. This area has already been developed with the City offices, police station, and early childhood development center. The proposed development will change the nature of a portion of the site from open space to one that is urban in nature. The Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide, May 2000, will be utilized to guide the orderly and integrated development of the site, which includes a mix of land use (retail shops, office spaces, housing, recreation, community facilities, and open space). The Guide emphasizes the importance of creating attractive gathering spots, commons areas, and comfortable walking environments for visitors and residents. Furthermore, the Guide identifies the importance of maintaining a sense of place by incorporating tree -lined boulevards, natural drainage swales, open spaces, appropriate building materials (wood, masonry, and stone), landscaping, and architectural standards. Historic and Archaeological Resources The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted regarding archaeology and historic resources in the area. The SHPO completed their review, acknowledged that the overall area contains a large number of recorded sites, but recommended that no further study is necessary at the site of the proposed Legacy at Wood's Edge Development. 2. Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects The EAW and this Findings of Fact address the impacts related to the proposed development, based on existing conditions and post - development conditions. The City of Lino Lakes is not aware or any other large -scale development plans that are contingent upon the completion of the Legacy Development. 3. Extent to Which Environmental Effects Are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority The mitigation of environmental impacts will be designed and implemented in coordination with regulatory agencies and would be subject to plan approval and the permitting process. Permits and approvals that may be required for the proposed development include: • • • Legacy at Wood's Edge Record of Decision City of Lino Lakes February 2004 City of Lino Lakes; Preliminary Plat Approval, Rezoning /PUD Approval, Final Plat Approval, Site Plan Approval, and Building Permits, Anoka County; Permit for Work Within CSAH 23 R/W, Final Plat Review Rice Creek Watershed District; Land Development Permit Approval Metropolitan Council; Sanitary Sewer Extension MPCA• Sanitary Sewer Extension, NPDES Construction Permit MN Dept. of Health; Watermain Extension Permit MN Dept. of Transportation; Final Plat Review, Permit for Work Within I -35W Right -of -Way 4. Extent to Which Environmental Effects Can be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies Undertaken by Public Agencies or the Project Proposers, Including EIS's Previously Prepared on Similar Projects The RGU, City of Lino Lakes, has extensive experience in the planning and review of residential and commercial development projects. The City of Lino Lakes finds that the environmental effects of the proposed mixed -use development have been anticipated and will be controlled as a result of environmental review and experience with other similar residential and commercial developments within the City. EAW COMMENTS AND RESPONSES The EAW for the Legacy at Wood's Edge Development was distributed on November 24, 2003 to agencies and organizations on the official Environmental Quality Board (EQB) distribution list, as well as additional agencies /organizations that had either requested a copy of the document, and /or that could be affected by the proposed project. The comment period for the EAW officially expired on December 24, 2003. Consistent with state and federal environmental review rules, substantive comments are responded to in this Record of Decision /Findings of Fact. Written responses have been provided for comments pertaining to analysis conducted for and documented in the EAW. Specifically, responses have been prepared for statements noting: incorrect or unclear information or content requirements. Comments agreeing with the information, general opinions, or statements of preference were not provided a formal response. Copies of written comments received are provided on the following pages with "footnote" responses in the margin. tpla Minnesota Department of Transportation OPnti Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 December 23, 2003 Michael Grochala Comm. Development Directot 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 SUBJECT: Legacy at Wood's Edge Development, Mn/DOT Review #EAW03 -029 SE Quad of 1-35W and County Road 23 (Lake Drive) Lino Lake, Anoka County Control Section 0280 Dear Mr. Grochala: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Representative from Mn/DOT recently met with your city staff regarding the potential impacts from this development at the interchange at I -35W and Lake Drive. Based on the outcome of this meeting additional information will be needed to determine the full impact of this development. The city stated that the developers are working on a traffic study that will identify current and future needs at the interchange, in addition to interim measures that will mitigate some of the traffic impacts of this development. This is to be sent to Mn/DOT when the development is sent to our agency for plat and/or site plan review. Currently Mn/DOT does not have any improvements planned for this interchange in the 20 -year Transportation System Plan. Mn/DOT is currently initiating an 1 -35 Study, from I-694 to Hinkely Minnesota to determine the 20 -year needs of the study corridor. However, we would recommend that the city by and secure funding as soon as possible for any future interchange improvements. Mn/DOTs policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic. noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOTs noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Desibm section at (651) 582 -1293. An equal opportunity employer RESPONst 1 An initial traffic simulation model was presented to Mn /DOT and the Anoka County Highway Department in early December 2003. Additional traffic scenarios were requested and are being developed, reviewed, and discussed at this time. 2 Due to the absence of County, State, and Federal funds for the full reconstruction of the Lake Drive /I -35W interchange, the City has proposed interim improvements to address forecast traffic needs. The City is actively pursuing additional funds for interim and long -term improvements. 3 Recognizing the incompatibility between residential development and highways, the site plan has been prepared to include commercial structures adjacent to I -35W and Lake Drive, while the majority of residential units have been centrally located on the site. • • o``�' COL Anoka County • • John K. VonDeLinde Director Department of Parks and Recreation December 29, 2003 550 Bunker Lake Boulevard NW • Andover, Minnesota 55304 Telephone (763) 757 -3920 • FAX (763) 755-0230 Mike Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Dear Mike: Please accept this letter as acknowledgment of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the "Legacy at Wood's Edge Development" done by Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc (SEM), November 2003. The Anoka County Parks and Recreation Department has reviewed the worksheet and makes the following comments: • the proposed development is adjacent to the Rice Creek Chain -of -lakes Regional Park Reserve; • the EAW has identified natural resource issues and is complete; • the proposed development will have minimal impact to the park property. From our perspective, the consultants, SEH, have done a thorough task of identifying and mitigating impacts on the adjacent wetlands and the surrounding natural environment. We are glad to see that the proposed land use will be buffered by the existing woodlands and wetlands. We are also encouraged to see that these areas will be designated as out -lots held in public ownership. As we discussed, future trail access into the park will offer many benefits to people living and working there. Once you begin to develop trail plans, we should take a closer look at potential corridors and connections that will work with our existing and propsed trail system plan within the park. We appr develop S L-c= N' Eoloff P • rk Planner /RLA John VonDellnde Michael McDonough, Met Council e the opportunity to review your plans. Please keep us Informed on the progress of the • 1 RESPONSE 1 The City of Lino Lakes concurs with the Anoka County Parks Department comment. 2 As part of the proposed development, the intent is to provide a trail connection along the easterly portion of the development that would extend into the regional park. Further coordination between the City, Anoka County Parks Department, and developer will occur to identify the proposed trail corridors. • • • It Metropolitan Council Smiting communities that work December 22, 2003 Michael Grochala, Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Ickes, MN 55014 RE: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)– Legacy at Woods Edge Metropolitan Council District II (Georgie Hilker, 651- 296 -4276) Metropolitan Council Review File No. 19065 -1 Dear Mr. Grochala: Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the City of Lino Lake's Environmental Assessment Worksheet concerning the Legacy at Woods Edge development proposal. It is Council staff s understanding that this EAW involves a mixed -use project located on approximately 65 acres in the southeast quadrant of the I35 W and Anoka County 23 interchange. The proposal includes almost 350,000 square feet of office/retail commercial use, 450 multi - family residential units, and 38,000 square feet of civic uses. Council staff has reviewed this EAW to determine both its adequacy and accuracy in addressing regional concerns and its potential for significant environmental impact. Staff finds that the Draft EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for regional purposes. However, Metropolitan Council staff provides the advisory comments itemized below for your consideration when making subsequent project decisions. Item II – Fish, Wildlife and Ecologically Sensitive Resources Since virtually all of the stormwater is directed to the regional park there could be a regional system impact to the Regional Recreation Open Space System if the storinwater quality and or volume are such that they negatively impact the natural resources of the park. A number of stonnwater management techniques are listed in the EAW as potential ways to manage stormwater runoff. There are more ideas available in the Metropolitan Council's Urban Small Sites BMP Manual. The manual is available at http:// www. metroeouneil. ortt/environment /Watershed/BMP /manual.htm; Given the extent of wetland habitat adjacent to the site, Council staff recommends that surmountable curbing be required for the roadways to be constructed within the project. Item 17 —Water Quality– Surface Water Runoff In addition to the underground storm water chambers proposed to be utilized to infiltrate on -site runoff, Council staff recommends incorporation of rain garden bin- infiltration wwr:metnxamneil.org - Metro Into Lae 602.1898 280 Eat Fifth Street • St..Paut. Mtatu rota 55101.1026 • 16511602 -1000 • Fax 602.1510 • TTY 291.0904 Aa aq..+'014,00.9Y sa,Wnnr RESPONSE 1 The majority of the site will be developed at a high level of urban development. However, the City recognizes the extensive wildlife habitat east of the site and proposes to install surmountable curbing along the easterly side of the roadway located in the northeastern portion of the site. This would allow any wildlife that enters the urban area from the wetland complex to the east the ability to traverse the curb and retreat back to the east to undeveloped portions of the site and the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park. areas into the design of the many parking lot vegetated islands on the site. It is unclear from the document if this low impact development practice is currently part of the proposal. By constructing depressed rather than raised islands and surrounding the islands with curb cuts or concrete edges that slope to the interior of the islands, runoff from the parking areas can be muted into these vegetated areas, then through a piped overflow into the underground chambers. In this fashion the first flush of runoff events can be retained in the bio- infiltration areas, maximizing the efficiency of the rest of the runoff treatment train. Item 10 — Land Cover and Item 25 — Nearby Resources. The proposal includes a high percentage of impervious surfaces that will cover 30 acres if the project is implemented as proposed. To preserve water quality in the adjacent regional park stormwater runoff from the development will need to be managed in an ecologically sensitive manner. Portions of the site are identified as regionally important in the joint Metropolitan Council and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Regional Natural Resources Inventory and Assessment (NRI/A). The EAW should acknowledge this designation. Areas of particular concern include: • proposed reductions in wooded/forested land cover abutting the regional park; • potential loss of the island of oak woods in the southwest/central part of the site; • use of native vegetation in the proposed urban/suburban landscaping where there are development transitions to the regional park's natural areas. Item 19 Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions This item states that "excessively drained soils and relatively high ground water table creates a potential for ground water contamination." The sanitary waste issue is addressed through the municipal sanitary treatment off site. It is recommend that this information also be considered when managing stormwater runoff. Deep stormwater ponds would have the potential to directly contaminate ground water with oils, road salt, and other contaminates associated with roads and parking lots. Item 21— Traffic The EAW states that year 2020 traffic volumes for full build -out of the site will be part of a simulation program that is being developed. It further states that results of the traffic simulation as it relates to the regional transportation system will be shared and discussed with Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the Anoka County Highway department. The results of the traffic simulation model should also be shared and discussed with the Metropolitan Council. There is currently no transit service to the proposed development. However, Routes 250 and 262 do operate local service in the area, and Route 250 travels past the site on Lake Drive on its "deadhead" routing to and from St. Joseph's Church Park & Ride lot. Metro Transit and Metro Transit Services can consider rerouting one or both of these routes to offer residents service to both downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul. In 2 2 3 4 5 6 RESPONSE 2 The majority of the interior parking lot islands do not have sufficient area to treat and store the amount of runoff that will be generated from the proposed development, but these islands will consist of a pervious surface that will provide some infiltration. Detention ponds and underground infiltration chambers will be utilized to treat and store runoff from the site. Where applicable, a drop curb design will be used to provide access to infiltration ponds. Currently, the site plan includes four onsite ponds that will receive runoff from impervious areas through a drop curb design. 3 At the time the EAW was written, the City was not aware of the Regional Natural Resources Inventory and Assessment (NRI /A) and that the MNDNR and Metropolitan Council had identified a portion of the site in the assessment. The Metropolitan Council was contacted, and a copy of the NRI /A map was attained. Preservation efforts have been incorporated into the site plan that will reduce impacts on a grove of mature trees located on the eastern side of the site (adjacent to the park). Furthermore, the proposed development includes natural open space areas and vegetative buffers between the development and the park boundary. 4 Suitable separation (3 to 4 feet) will be maintained between the bottom of detention ponds /infiltration chambers and groundwater to minimize the potential for contamination. addition, they could review the possibility of reverse commute service out from the downtowns for the office portion of the development if there is sufficient demand. Metro Transit would prefer for any potential bus stops for the development to be located on Lake Drive to minimize route deviations and extra running time. Therefore, it is important that there are good pedestrian connections throughout the development and to Lake Drive. If the proposed residential development is within 1/4 toile of Lake Drive it would generally be considered -a reasonable walking distance to transit service. Also in the southbound direction riders would need to cross Lake Drive to board the bus, so a traffic signal/crosswalk is suggested. Since any, potential bus stops would probably be on Lake Drive, safety for buses making stops should be kept in mind when designing the proposed improvements on Lake Drive. At the present time one of the region's largest park and ride facilities (I-35W at 95th Ave in Blaine, 800 spaces) is only a couple of miles from the site. Most likely commuters will drive to this park and ride, which offers a high level of express service to downtown Minneapolis and also limited stop service to St. Paul. Also the City of Lino Lakes is within the service area for the Anoka County Traveler. Currently, dial -a -ride service is available in the area. This concludes the Council's review of EAW. The Council will take no formal action. If you have any questions, need further information, or would like to meet with staff to discuss any comments noted above, please contact Bob Mazanec, principal reviewer, at 651- 602 -1330 or at bob.mazanec@metc.state.ran.us. Sincerely, -G//5 4415 00 Phyllis Hanson, Manager Office of Planning and Technical Assistance cc: Georgie Hilker, Metropolitan Council District 11 Bob'Mazanec, Office of Planning and Technical Assistance Cheryl Olson, Reviews Coordinator, Office of Planning and Technical Assistance V:\REVIEWS\Communities\Lino Lakes\Letters\Lino Lakes 2003 EAW Legacy Woods final letter 19065 -1.doc 3 6 RESPONSE 5 The Metropolitan Council will be contacted when the results of the traffic simulation are available for discussion and review. 6 The City is supportive of expanding transit services to this area of the City. Sidewalks are being proposed throughout the development that would provide access to Lake Drive and any future bus stops. The signalization of Lake Drive has been identified as part of the transportation improvements necessary for the proposed development. This would provide a controlled crossing point for pedestrians or transit users to cross Lake Drive. • • December 24, 2003 COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 (763) 862-4200 FAX (763) 862-4201 Mr. Michael Grochala, Director Community Development CITY OF LINO LAKES 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lake, MN 55014 SUBJECT: Legacy at Woods Edge EAW Dear Mike, First, and foremost, I'd like to thank you for including the County in the preliminary reviews of this project. A well- designed, safe and functional roadway system will be a key component to the success of this project. We appreciate your willingness to work with us on these issues. With respect to the EAW information, our major concerns, of course, are the roads, from safety, capacity, and funding points of view. These concerns include: • Currently, the County does not have any improvements planned to CSAH 23 (Lake Drive), nor are any scheduled through 2015. • While the 2020 Traffic Volume Forecast in the Lino Lakes Transportation Plan anticipates volumes on CSAH 23 "to increase to over 17,000 trips per day" (EAW pg. 23), the County's 2015 Transportation Plan anticipates volumes of 9,000 on the southwest side of 1-35W interchange in front of the development. • Access management in the area between 1 -35 W and the south project limits should meet the County's Access Management Guidelines. Mn/DOT's guidelines may also apply. • The development- initiated improvements to the County Road system should be designed in accordance with the guidelines for plat and site plan review in the County's Development Review Process manual dated December, 2003. • The City, County, and Mn/DOT, may wish to consider a short-, mid -, and long -range programming and funding plan for the road improvements recommended in the Affirmative Action t Equal Opportunity Employer 1 2 RESPONSE 1 The City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Transportation Plan forecast traffic volume for Lake Drive /CSAH 23 was based on 1996 ADT volumes. The 2002 Traffic Flow maps indicate the traffic volumes on Lake Drive /CSAH 23 near Elm Street were 10,000 trips per day. The 2002 map may include traffic counts from year 2000 and probably does not reflect the growth in the Target/Kohls development area north of I -35W. Therefore, the City believes the existing traffic volumes on the southwest side of the I -35W interchange already exceed the Anoka County 2015 forecast volume of 9,000 trips per day. 2 The development will allow for the closure of one access point that currently provides access to Artic Sandblasting Company. Additional access closures or restrictions will be pursued at the time capacity and safety improvements are made to this portion of Lake Drive. • • • Legacy at Woods Edge 2 December 24, 2603 EAW. It would be prudent to plan the improvements in such a way as to avoid reconstruction of any interim improvements made—in other words, maximize the potential of our investments. • The EAW mentions a future "traffic simulation as it relates to the regional transportation system" (EAW pg. 25). The County is very interested in seeing the results of this simulation and we look forward to discussing these with you and Mn/DOT, hopefully prior to Preliminary Plat review. • There is some concern about the impact of this project on traffic farther south on CSAH 23. While it is understood that this is outside of the scope of the EAW, development of this portion of the City will anchor, or set in stone, the potential for alternatives. Before alternatives are eliminated, it would be helpful to discuss the cumulative impact of this, and other, development projects in greater detail with the City. • We encourage early, possibly draft, submittal of any Preliminary Plat and/or site plan of the Legacy at Woods Edge to the County Staff for review. This is an important development for the City and we would like to give it as much attention as needed. Thanks, again, for the opportunity to be involved in this project early in the process. We look forward to continuing discussions with the City on the items listed above. Sincerely ,,tg,efozW Kate Garwood Multimodal Transportation Manager cc; Doug Fischer, County Engineer Jane Rose, Traffic Engineering Manager Brigid Gombold, Mn/DOT Ann Braden. Metro Council 3 4 RESPONSE 3 An initial traffic simulation model was presented to staff from the Anoka County Highway Department and Mn /DOT in early December 2003. Additional traffic scenarios were requested and are being developed, reviewed, and discussed at this time. 4 The preliminary plat for the proposed development was submitted to Anoka County on December 16, 2003. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST. PAUL DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS 190 FIFTH STREET EAST ST. PAUL, MN 56101-1638 arm December 18, 2003 AUSm0N ON Construction - Operations Regulatory (04- 01360 -TJF) Mr. Mike Grochala City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota $5014 Dear Mr. Grochala: We have reviewed. the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) that was prepared for a project in Lino. Lakes called the Legacy at Wood's Edge ... Development rights for portions of the site have been acquired. by The Hartford Group. The project site is in the southeast quadrant of I35W and Lake Drive in the NE 1/4 Sec. 17, T. 31N., R. 22W., Anoka County, Minnesota. The EAW indicates that wetland areas on the site :would be preserved. The Corps of Engineers, regulates -the discharge of dredged and fill material into waters and wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. If the project involves no work. in any waters - or wetlands a permit will not be required from the Corps. We understand a wetland delineation has been conducted; and the development would not require any work within any waters or wetlands. This delineation should be verified by the Corps or the Rice Creek Watershed District. Also, all wetlands should be clearly staked in the field to avoid inadvertent encroachment during construction. If you have any questions, contact Timothy J. Fell in our St. Paul office at (651) 290 -5360. In any correspondence or inquiries, please refer to the Regulatory number shown above. Sincerely, Ede bert J. hiting Chief, Regulatory Branch CF: RCWD. 1 RESPONSE 1 Prior to the commencement of construction activities, wetland boundaries will be staked and reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District. • • • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency December 17', 200'3 Mr. Michael Grochala: City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE The Legacy at WoodsEdge Development Dear Mr. Grocbala: The draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Legacy at Woods Edge Development has been reviewed by Minnesota. Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff. This comment letter addresses matters of concern to MPCA staff reviewing the EAW and is submitted for consideration by the City of Lino Lakes, the responsible governmental unit, in deciding whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared on the project., It does not constitute approval by the MPCA of any or all elements of the project for the purpose of pending or future permit action(s) by the MPCA. We have attempted to identify and consult with interested program staff to identify the MPCA permits that may be required. Additional comments or requests for information maybe submitted in the future to address specific issues related to the development of such permit(s). Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the project proposer to secure any required permits and to comply with any requisite permit conditions. The following comments are made for your use in revising the draft EAW. Item 17:b. This section should include the need to comply with the MPCA Phase II Stormwater Permit. The EAW states "Following development of the proposed site, storm water will be treated through infiltration in open spaces or subsurface chamber technology and through retention ponds that will meet National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) guidelines ..... ' The Phase II NPDES permit contains requirements for sizing and settling velocities that the pond must achieve in order to be in compliance with the permit. These requirements are not the same asNURP requirements and need to be incorporated in to the pond design." Thank you for the opportunity to review the EAW. Should you have any questions about this letter, please contact meat (651) 296-7796. Sincerely, Vn Kelly Garvey Project Manager Operations and Environmental Review Section Regional Environmental Management Division KG.min 529 Lafayette Rd. N.; Saint Paul, MN 551554194; (612).296.6300 (Voice); (612) 282 -5332 (TTY); www.pca.atate.mn.us St. Paul • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Duluth • Mankato • Marshal Rochester. Willmar Egeni oppott nityEmployer • Printed on recycled paper containing at Waal 20 percent fibers horn paper recycled by consumers. 1 RESPONSE The permanent storm water management system will consist of a combination of wet sediment basins and infiltration systems (underground chambers and ponds) to meet the requirements of the NPDES Permit No. MN R100001. Furthermore, the project has been designed to meet the Rice Creek Watershed District infiltration requirements of 0.34 inches of runoff and dead storage requirements of 2.5 inches of runoff. A large portion of the runoff from the site is directed to a series of infiltration basins /ponds located along the southerly and easterly boundaries of the site or through underground infiltration chambers. Runoff from these systems eventually outlet to a wetland (Wetland 2 on Figure 7 of the EAW) that is connected to another extensive wetland complex (Wetland 1) that is located in the George Watch Lake watershed. • • • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 651:772.7900 December I8, 2003 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Legacy at Woods Edge Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Dear Mr. Grochala: The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the EAW for the proposed Legacy at Woods Edge Development in the City of Lino Lakes. In general, the EAW appears to be complete and accurate. We offer the following comments for your consideration. Cover Types (Item No. 10) Table 1 shows the conversion of 4,6 acres of wooded/forest cover. This may result in the removal of a significant amount of wood from the Site Depending on its condition, this wood may be used as landscaping material, firewood, or as a replacement for coal in the production of energy. The developer should contact Jean Moodie, Regional Forest Utilization and Marketing Specialist (651772- 7567), for advice on this subject. Water Ouality: Surface Water Runoff (Item No 17) The project proposer has done a good job of incorporating stormwater infiltration technologies into the plans for this site The EAW states that the project will result in a zero percent post - development increase in runoff rates. We recommend that this control be coupled with a zero percent increase in runoff volumes. Improvement in volume control would be desirable, especially considering that the project will result in a 43 percent increase in impervious cover in the shoreland district of Marshan Lake. Item No. 17b states that treated stormwater either will be infiltrated or discharged to wetlands. The EAW does not state the change in stormwater runoff volume from the site. This information would be useful and we recommend that it be included in the EAW. Thank you for the opportunity to review this project and the EAW. We look forward to receiving your record of decision and responses to comments at the conclusion of environmental review. Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, subparts 4 and 5, require you to send us your Record of Decision within five days of deciding on this action. If you have any questions about these comments, please call Wayne Barstad, the Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, at 651- 772 -7940. An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity DNR Information: 651.296-6157 1.888 -648 -6367 TTY: 851.296 -5484 1.800- 657.3929 1 2 RESPONSE 1 The City will evaluate alternative uses of wood removed from the site and will contact the Regional Forest Utilization and Marketing Specialist for further assistance. 2 The storm water management plan for the proposed development incorporates wet sediment basins and infiltration systems (ponds /basins and underground chambers) to treat and store runoff, which results in a system that exceeds The Rice Creek Watershed and City storm water requirements for treatment and storage. However, as is typically the case with most developments, the post - development conditions will result in an overall increase of runoff volume. This increase in runoff volume is likely to only occur in the George Watch Lake Watershed because the storm water management plan establishes a drainage system that routes nearly all runoff from the site to the east and into the George Watch Lake Watershed. Runoff from impervious surfaces that are within the Marshan Lake Shoreland District is directed to a series of infiltration basins /ponds that eventually outlets to a wetland, which is tributary to another extensive wetland complex located in the George Watch Lake watershed. Therefore, the increase in runoff volume from the site will have no net effect on the Marshan Lake Watershed and Shoreland District. Lt.6acy at Woods Edge EAW December 18, 2003 Page 2 Sincerely, for Kathleen A. Wallace Regional Director C: Steve Colvin Wayne Barstad Jean Mouelle Sarah Hoffmann Bryan Lueth Tom Hovey Dave Zappetillo Tom Balcom Jon Larsen, EQB Nick Rowse, USFWS #20030164 LLO3LegacyWoodsEdge.doc • An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity DNR Information: 651 - 296-6157 1- 888 - 646 -6367 TTY 851.296-5484 1. 800.657 -3929 RESPONSE 2 cont. The EAW incorrectly stated that the impervious surface coverage within the Marshan Lake Shoreland District was calculated to be approximately 43% of the total area within the Shoreland District boundary. The correct statement should have read that the impervious surface coverage was calculated to be approximately 43% of the area for only the portion of the proposed development that falls within the Marshan Lake Shoreland District. The percent change in impervious cover within the entire Marshan Lake Shoreland District that results from the proposed development would be substantially lower. • Legacy at Wood's Edge Record of Decision City of Lino Lakes February 2004 CONCLUSIONS 1. All requirements for environmental review of the proposed project have been met. 2. The EAW and the permit processes related to the project have generated information that is adequate to determine whether the project has the potential for significant environmental effects. 3. Mitigation will be provided where impacts are expected to result from project construction and operation of the site. Mitigative measures are incorporated into the site plan, and have or will be coordinated with state and local agencies during the permit process. 4. Based on the criteria in Minnesota Rules 4410, the project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5. An EIS is not required on the proposed Legacy at Wood's Edge Development project. 6. The City of Lino Lakes passed Resolution No 04 -19 on February 9, 2004 stating its approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet and its acceptance of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions for the Legacy at Wood's Edge Development. Community Development Director, City of Lino Lakes Date x:\ko\linol \030500 \word \eawrecordofdecision.doc • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: C. C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 7D Jeff Smyser February 9, 2004 Resolution 04 -18: Approving • Allocation of 2.24 Acres Commercial MUSA • Amendment to Conditional Use Permit For Private Club • Variance for Setbacks Circle -Lex VFW, 7868 Lake Drive VOTE: 3/5 for MUSA, 3/5 for CUP, 3/5 for Variance (combined into one resolution) BACKGROUND The Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 is interested in constructing a new building at their site on the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Lois Lane. The site is not in the current MUSA, but the City has ample MUSA reserve for commercial projects. The site has a conditional use permit (CUP) which will need to be amended to allow the construction of the new building. The required site and building plan review is an administrative review, but the review elements are relevant to the CUP. Because of the VFW's willingness to dedicate additional right of way, building and parking drive setback variances are needed along Lake Drive. The City approved a CUP amendment in April 1999 for an addition to the existing building, which was never constructed. The new application would replace that plan. ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning: Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site VFW Commercial, Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area, outside of MUSA General Business North residential Commercial General Business South auto garage, retail Commercial General Business East residential Commercial General Business and Rural West residential Low & Med. Density Sewered Resid. R -1 Circle -Lex VFW page 2 The submittal compares with the GB General Business zoning standards as follows: The site consists of several individual parcels. These will be combined into one tax parcel as a condition of approval. Growth Management and MUSA: The site currently is not within the MUSA. With the adoption of the comprehensive plan, the City has a MUSA reserve. As stated in the comprehensive plan and reiterated in Ordinance 01 -03, the Growth Management Policy, we have commercial /industrial MUSA reserve. This can be allocated anytime prior to year 2010. The current balance of commercial MUSA reserve is 73 acres, and the VFW project will require 2.24 acres. The site is within a Stage 1 growth area, which allows for utility extension prior to year 2010. It is guided for commercial land use. It will not overburden the transportation, sanitary sewer, or water infrastructure and the development is not premature according to the standards listed in City ordinance and incorporated into the growth management policy. Sanitary sewer and water service exist in Lake Drive. SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Building: The building reflects the design elements of the City Hall, Community State Bank, and other buildings along Lake Drive. These include a peaked, green metal roof, masonry walls, and earthtone colors: buff, red, and charcoal. The average height of the pitched roof is 22 ft. This is the technical building height, according to the definition in the zoning ordinance. (The roof peak will be approximately 30 ft. high.) The building footprint is approximately 11,500 sf. The faux chimneys on the building entrance gable ends echo the theme of other buildings in Lino Lakes. Fire suppression sprinklers will be required. Required Proposed Lot size minimum 20,000 sf 2.03 acres (not incl. ROW) Lot width minimum 100' 220' Setbacks: buildings from arterial 40' 34' from local street 30' 80' rear lot line 30' 200 +' side lot line parking from street 10' 15' 20' 5.5' rear lot line 10' 10' side lot line 10' 10' Bldg. height 45' 22' Impervious max. 75% 69% The site consists of several individual parcels. These will be combined into one tax parcel as a condition of approval. Growth Management and MUSA: The site currently is not within the MUSA. With the adoption of the comprehensive plan, the City has a MUSA reserve. As stated in the comprehensive plan and reiterated in Ordinance 01 -03, the Growth Management Policy, we have commercial /industrial MUSA reserve. This can be allocated anytime prior to year 2010. The current balance of commercial MUSA reserve is 73 acres, and the VFW project will require 2.24 acres. The site is within a Stage 1 growth area, which allows for utility extension prior to year 2010. It is guided for commercial land use. It will not overburden the transportation, sanitary sewer, or water infrastructure and the development is not premature according to the standards listed in City ordinance and incorporated into the growth management policy. Sanitary sewer and water service exist in Lake Drive. SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Building: The building reflects the design elements of the City Hall, Community State Bank, and other buildings along Lake Drive. These include a peaked, green metal roof, masonry walls, and earthtone colors: buff, red, and charcoal. The average height of the pitched roof is 22 ft. This is the technical building height, according to the definition in the zoning ordinance. (The roof peak will be approximately 30 ft. high.) The building footprint is approximately 11,500 sf. The faux chimneys on the building entrance gable ends echo the theme of other buildings in Lino Lakes. Fire suppression sprinklers will be required. • • Circle -Lex VFW page 3 The trash enclosure on the east side of the building will be constructed of materials to match the principal building. The existing garage, not shown on the survey, must be removed. The building is set back from Lois Lane 70'. The parking is set back 15'. Since the Lois Lane side is the shorter fronting on a road, it is considered the front for measuring setbacks. This makes the east the side lot line, where the setback of 20' complies with the requirement. The following discussion addresses setbacks from Lake Drive. Variance: The existing Lake Drive right of way is not of consistent width along the entire property. It is 40' from the centerline along the southern portion, then 50' along the northern portion. The VFW is proposing to dedicate additional right of way to provide for future needs and make the right of way consistent. An additional 20' will be dedicated on the south, and an additional 10' along the north. This will result in a consistent 60' from centerline. Future right of way width recommended for this arterial is 120' total. Additional width will be obtained when/if land on the west side of the road subdivides. (In fact, the Crystal Cove plat will dedicate an additional 10'.) This squeezes the site a little. In order to fit the proposed building and parking drive, the VFW is requesting a setback variance. The required setback from an arterial roadway (Lake Drive, CSAH 23) is 40'. The building will be approximately 34' from the new property line. The parking drive will be about 5' from the line instead of the required 15' . The full right of way will be in place. This eliminates concern about additional roadway needs and public costs of condemning land and, possibly, demolishing buildings or other facilities. The building will be six feet closer than normally required. The parking drive will be 9.5' closer than normally required. The main issue here is the 5 +' of land for landscaping. It is difficult to provide extensive landscaping and screening. However, there is little screening along Lake Drive in this commercial area. The project will significantly improve the appearance of the site, including landscaping. Lighting: Light fixtures in the parking lot will be on six poles. Three, in the northern parking area, will have two fixtures each. One single fixture will be near the Lois Lane driveway, and two others in the southern parking area. The submitted photometric plan indicates that lighting meets city standards: no more than 0.4 foot candles at the residential property line to the east, and no more than 1.0 at street right of way lines. The exterior building lighting is included. The submitted fixture cut sheets show 90 degree cut off fixtures in compliance with city requirements. The lighting under the north and south entry canopies is completely recessed, similar to what the current ordinance requires for motor fuel station canopies. Signage: No additional ground signs are indicated on the plan. An area of the south wall indicates an area for wall signage. The VFW will remove the existing pylon sign. Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. • • • Circle -Lex VFW page 4 Landscaping, Screening: As shown on the landscape plan, a variety of trees, shrubs and ornamental plantings are proposed on site. A new six -foot, cedar privacy fence is proposed, to continue the segment of existing fence, which will extend along the residential property lines on the east. This provides screening for those lots. The fence also will be built along other property lines. Only the street sides will not be fenced. Plantings labeled "vide" that were not listed in the plant list have been identified. The City native seed schedule should be used in infiltration and ponding areas. Utilities: The VFW site currently is not within the MUSA, but the City has plenty of commercial MUSA reserve to accommodate the needed 2.24 acres needed. Water and sanitary sewer service are available to serve the site in Lake Drive. The existing VFW building has a well and onsite septic system. Both are in locations that will be completely or partially covered by the new building. If the existing building is to continue operating during construction of the new building, there must be a way to supply water and dispose of wastewater. The new plans show temporary connections to city utilities as well as the permanent connections. As a condition of plan approval, utility related modifications and comments as set forth in the City Engineer's memo 'should to be incorporated into the final plans. Stormwater management: The new plan proposes ponding along the northern and eastern borders of the site. (Ponds proposed within the Lake Drive right of way on earlier plans have been eliminated.) The City Engineer review is attached. Drainage and utility easements must be created over all ponds. The applicant will be required to enter into a ponding maintenance agreement with the city. As a condition of plan approval, the grading and drainage related modifications and comments as set forth in the City Engineer's memo should be incorporated into the plans. The residential properties on the east have wells. State law requires that there must be at least 50' separation between a well and a stormwater pond. The applicant has submitted information stating that the wells are in front of the two houses to the southeast (785 and 793 Lois Lane). Further east, the next house is several hundred feet away and the well is in front of the house. Access, Circulation, Parking: Right Of Way Lake Drive is CSAH 23, a principal arterial roadway. Ultimately, Anoka County will need 60 feet of right of way on each side of the centerline for Lake Drive, for a total width of 120 feet. There is some discrepancy over the current width of the Lake Drive right of way. The half - section shows the right of way as 100' along the entire frontage of the site. The submitted survey, however, shows a jog in the property /right of way line: the total ROW is 100 feet along the northern part of the property, but only 90' along the southern part. Circle -Lex VFW page 5 As explained above under "variance ", the VFW is proposing to dedicate additional ROW to create an even line, a consistent 60' from the centerline. Access, Circulation Current access to the site is not well defined. Neither Lake Drive nor Lois Lane have curbs. Access occurs along the property line, not necessarily by defined driveways. Anoka County is planning to construct a median in the future as part of Lake Drive improvements. This will restrict access to many properties, as it will eliminate left turns in and out of many driveways. The improved site will be accessed from two driveways, one each on Lake Drive and Lois Lane. A full access through a future Lake Drive median may have better probability if the driveway aligns with a public road (79`h St.), though this is not assured. Whether or not the median is constructed, the Lake Drive driveway should align with 79th St. for a safe "intersection ", even if it's only for the interim. The January 21 plans show this alignment. The Lois Lane driveway is as far back from the Lake Drive intersection as possible while still providing the minimum 10' setback from the side property line. The plan proposes two distinct parking areas. The smaller area on the south side is intended to accommodate the bar and restaurant. The northern area will serve the assembly hall. The parking lots and driveways will be asphalt with curbs. In the northern area, the drive lane that parallels Lake Drive has the potential to connect with a parking area on property to the north when it develops. This serves as a de facto frontage road. With the likelihood of a median in Lake Drive, access for both sites will be better if they can use one another's driveway. It increases the number of Lake Drive driveways available for each site from one to two, while only building one on each site. This will require a cross access easement for both sites. Because Lake Drive is an arterial, it will be a good idea to require a stop sign for vehicles exiting the parking lot onto Lake Drive. Parking For bars and restaurants, our code requires 10 spaces per 1000 sf, plus one space per employee on the maximum shift. This criterion was applied to the whole building when the American Legion was reviewed. Zoning Ord. Req. Required Stalls Provided 10 spaces /1000 sf plus 1/ employee bar /restaurant area 1879 sf reception area 4549 sf total 6428 sf 64 employees bar 8 reception (estimate) 10 total 18 18 total 82 90 • • Circle -Lex VFW page 6 Much of the existing parking will be within the construction area, so much parking will be eliminated for the existing building. The VFW has submitted a sketch demonstrating that about20 cars can park on the site during the construction period. Some additional parking could occur on 79th St. Conditional Use Permit There are general criteria for all CUPs and specific conditions that apply to private clubs. General Criteria: The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds the following criteria have been met: a. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: Land Use Plan, Transportation Plan, Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans, Local Water Management Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, Policy Plan, Natural Environment Plan. • The proposed project creates no conflicts with the plans. b. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. • The site has been used for the same use for many years. The increase in size of the building will not create incompatibilities as long as the use complies with the performance standards and conditions. c. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. • The proposal complies with the zoning ordinance requirements if the variances are approved. d. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: 1) If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. 2) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. 3) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. 4) The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. 5) Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. 6) The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement • • • Circle -Lex VFW page 7 Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer - financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. 7) The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I -35E /Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties, that contribute to traffic at the interchange. 8) The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. • Traffic generated by the new building will increase somewhat over the existing use, but is not expected to create ongoing traffic problems. Large events will bring additional vehicles periodically. However, the number of vehicles likely will not create a safety hazard or significant impacts. The Apollo Drive and Main St. intersections with Lake Drive both are controlled intersections. If, in the future, traffic becomes an issue, the City can revisit the CUP and consider adding additional conditions such as traffic control personnel for large events. e. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. f The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer system. • The new building will be connected to city water and sanitary sewer. g. The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. • There will be no city capital expenditures for this project. h. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. • The project will create no such undesirable effects. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. • No such features exist on the site. Specific CUP Conditions: Private lodges and clubs are allowed as conditional uses in the GB zone provided that: a. Adequate screening from abutting and adjoining residential uses and landscaping is provided. b. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from adjoining and residential uses. c. Adequate off - street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where applicable by Section 3, Subd. 6. of this Ordinance. • • • Circle -Lex VFW page 8 • The review has discussed these issues, and they are addressed in the plans and conditions of approval. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on October 29, 2003. The Board's recommendations are attached. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD The P & Z conducted a public hearing over several meetings and on January 14 recommended approval of the project with conditions. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The project approval should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The separate parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel. The applicant must submit documentation that a lot combination has been filed with Anoka County prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County for Lake Drive, as indicated on the plans. A deed for this right of way shall be filed prior to building permit issuance. 3. The 50' separation between existing wells on all adjacent residential properties and the proposed stormwater ponds must be noted on construction plans. 4. Drainage and utility easements must be created over all ponds. Deeds for these easements shall be provided to the City prior to building permit issuance. 5. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated, 10 feet in width, along all lot lines. Deeds for these easements shall be provided to the City prior to building permit issuance. 6. The new building must connect to city water and sanitary sewer and pay appropriate connection charges. 7. Any existing septic systems or wells must be properly abandoned according to law. 8. The height of plantings near the driveway must not interfere with sight lines. 9. The City native seed schedule shall be used in infiltration and ponding areas. Circle -Lex VFW page 9 • 10. Issues listed in the February 3, 2004 memo by the City Engineer must be resolved to his satisfaction. • • 11. A stop sign shall be installed for the Lake Drive driveway. 12. All necessary permits shall be obtained by the applicant from Anoka County for work in the Lake Drive (CSAH 23) right of way. 13. Lighting must be as shown on submitted plan and fixture cut sheets. 14. Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. 15. The VFW shall enter into a site performance agreement prior to issuance of a building permit. 16. The VFW must agree to a mutual cross - access easement with the property to the north when that property develops. 17. If parking or traffic generation create problems in the future, the City may impose additional requirements to resolve such issues. 18. Project approval includes approval of setback variances to allow the building to be 34 feet from the new Lake Drive right of way, and the parking drive to be 5 feet from the new Lake Drive right of way. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 04 -18 approving the allocation of MUSA reserve, conditional use permit amendment, and variance for setbacks from Lake Drive, with the conditions listed. 2. Deny the application. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 Circle -Lex VFW page 10 • This review is based on the following submittals, received December 18, 2003 unless otherwise noted: 1. Site Plan, DSGW, received January 21, 2004 2. Grading Plan, Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, received January 21, 2004 3. Utility Plan, Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, received January 21, 2004 4. Memo from Michael J. Thomas, DSGW, December 4, 2003, rec'd. January 21, 2004 5. Letter from Brian Bourassa, Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, January 20, 2004, rec'd. January 21, 2004. 6. Wall Section, December 18, 2003 7. Floor Plan, DSGW, July 7, 2003 8. Exterior Elevations, DSGW, July 7, 2003 9. Landscape Plan, DSGW, December 18, 2003 10. Landscape Details, DSGW, December 18, 2003 11. Photometric Lighting Analysis, Engineering Design Initiative, December 18, 2003 12. Boundary and Topographic Survey, E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., 9/05/03, rec'd 10/10/03 13. Code Data, DSGW, 10/9/03, rec'd 10/10/03 14. Floor Plan, DSGW, 10/9/03, rec'd 10/10/03 15. Exterior Elevation, DSGW, 10/9/03, rec'd 10/10/03 16. Building Section, DSGW, 10/9/03, rec'd 10/10/03 • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04-18 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF 2.24 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL MUSA, APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND APPROVING VARIANCES FOR SETBACKS, FOR THE CIRCLE -LEX VFW SITE, 7868 LAKE DRIVE WHEREAS, the City has received an application for an amendment of a conditional use permit to allow a the construction of a new building for the Circle -Lex VFW, a private club; and WHEREAS, the subject property currently is zoned GB General Business; and WHEREAS, private clubs is a conditional use in the GB zone and the VFW has an existing conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: (see ATTACHMENT A) and WHEREAS, the site currently is not within the existing boundaries of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) but the requested MUSA allocation is consistent with the comprehensive plan and growth management policy because: • the site is guided for commercial use in the comprehensive plan, • the site is in a Stage 1 growth area • the City has MUSA reserve available for commercial development • the proposed development is not premature and WHEREAS, at their meeting on January 14, 2003, the Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing and recommended approval subject to conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the allocation of 2.24 acres of commercial MUSA for the site, and; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the • amendment to the conditional use permit, with the following conditions: 1. The separate parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel. The applicant must submit documentation that a lot combination has been filed with Anoka County prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County for Lake Drive, as indicated on the plans. A deed for this right of way shall be filed prior to building permit issuance. 3. The 50' separation between existing wells on all adjacent residential properties and the proposed stormwater ponds must be noted on construction plans. 4. Drainage and utility easements must be created over all ponds. Deeds for these easements shall be provided to the City prior to building permit issuance. 5. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated, 10 feet in width, along all lot lines. Deeds for these easements shall be provided to the City prior to building permit issuance. 6. The new building must connect to city water and sanitary sewer and pay appropriate connection charges. 7. Any existing septic systems or wells must be properly abandoned according to law. 8. The height of plantings near the driveway must not interfere with sight lines. 9. The City native seed schedule shall be used in infiltration and ponding areas. 10. Issues listed in the February 3, 2004 memo by the City Engineer must be resolved to his satisfaction. 11. A stop sign shall be installed for the Lake Drive driveway. 12. All necessary permits shall be obtained by the applicant from Anoka County for work in the Lake Drive (CSAH 23) right of way. 13. Lighting must be as shown on submitted plan and fixture cut sheets. 14. Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. 15. The VFW shall enter into a site performance agreement prior to issuance of a building permit. 16. The VFW must agree to a mutual cross - access easement with the property to the north when that property develops. 17. If parking or traffic generation create problems in the future, the City may impose additional requirements to resolve such issues. Resolution 04 -18, page 2 18. This approval is based on the following plans and related correspondence: • Site Plan, DSGW, received January 21, 2004 • Grading Plan, Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, received January 21, 2004 • Utility Plan, Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, received January 21, 2004 • Memo from Michael J. Thomas, DSGW, December 4, 2003, rec'd. January 21, 2004 • Letter from Brian Bourassa, Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, January 20, 2004, rec'd. January 21, 2004. • Wall Section, December 18, 2003 • Floor Plan, DSGW, July 7, 2003 • Exterior Elevations, DSGW, July 7, 2003 • Landscape Plan, DSGW, December 18, 2003 • Landscape Details, DSGW, December 18, 2003 • Photometric Lighting Analysis, Engineering Design Initiative, December 18, 2003 • Boundary and Topographic Survey, E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., 9/05/03, rec'd 10/10/03 • Code Data, DSGW, 10/9/03, rec'd 10/10/03 • Floor Plan, DSGW, 10/9/03, rec'd 10/10/03 • Exterior Elevation, DSGW, 10/9/03, rec'd 10/10/03 • Building Section, DSGW, 10/9/03, rec'd 10/10/03 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves setback variances to allow the building to be 34 feet from the new Lake Drive right of way, and the parking drive to be 5 feet from the new Lake Drive right of way. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of February, 2004 John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk Resolution 04 -18, page 3 • EXISTING PROPERTY • circle- Lex VFW Post 6583 7868 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, Minnesota . 55014 Attachment A Resolution 04 -18 All of Lot 8 and that part of Lot 7, AUD ITORS SUBDIWS1AN No. 100 according to the map or • plot thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota` lying southerly of the following described larat Beginning at a point on the easterly line of and 20 feet northerly from the southeast corner of said Lot 7; thence northwesterly to a point on the westerly Our of said Lot Z said point being 150 feet northeasterly from the southwesterly corner of said Lot 7 (as measured slang said westerly line) and there terrnanothg, EXCEP7ING therefrom any part lying within the Plat of Anoka County Highway Plot No. 17. And That part of Lot 9, Auoltor's Subdivision No. 100 Anoka County Minnesota described as follows: Commencing of a point on the Southerly line of said lot a distance of 234 feet Westerly of the Southeast corner thereof thence Northerly an a lhne. (if projected would intersect the Northerly /tine of said lot at a point Z00 feet Westerly of the Northeast corner thereof), for a distance of 101.6 feet to point of beginning thence continuing Northerly on last described line 134,3 feet, more or less, to the Northerly line of sold lot; thence Westerly on the Northerly line of sold Lot 151.28 feet, more or less, to the Northwest corner thereof; thence Southwesterly on the Westerly lane thereof also being the Easterly right - of-way fire of State Trunk Highway No. 8 far a distance of 100 feet thence Southeasterly 18.X67 feet, more or less, to point of beginning And That port of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 100 Anoka County Minnesota lying Westerly and Southerly of the following *scribed line: Beginning at a pobrt on the Southerly the of said Lot 9 a distance of 234 feet Westerly of the Southeast corner thereat, thence Northerly on a line (if projected would intersect the Northerly line of said lot at a point 200 feet Westerly of the Northeast corner thereof) for a distance of 101.6 feet; thence Northwesterly to a point an the Westerly line of said lot a distance of 100 feet. (as measured on said Westerly line) Southwesterly of the Northwest comer thereof, and there terminating Together with that port of vacated Lois And Together with that part of vacated Lois Lane, also being described as that part of the north 8 feet of Lot 1R Auditors Subdivision No. 104 Anoka County, Minnesota accruing thererto by reason of the vocation thereof (Document No. 510488). And Also the Westerly 10 feet of the Northerly 134.31 feet of that part of Lot 9, Auditors Subdivision L - No. 100, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as idioms' Beginning at a point on the Southerly / 0 line of said Lot 9 o distance of 120 feet Westerly of the Southeast corner of said lot; thence Westerly on said Southerly line a distance of 114 feet thence Northerly to a point on the Northerly line of sold tot a distance of 200 feet Westerly of the Northeast comer thereof thence c''." Easterly on said Northerly line a distance of 90 feet; thence Southerly to point of beginning. at 1 / L) :' `? :::::::.: ' 1 I hereby certify that this survey, plan / ::�' if or report was prepared by me or under / �Z"; {.y my direct supervision and that I am / �� y''.'i ,,, ::,d. a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. / Z� ,1".• ;%`�� oi%zv. License No. 9lv8 / s:�'_ ... + H 1 Cate: / 0O .. REVISIONS: / .�� 1 :V::: : L�/ 09 -05-03 Add parking revisions & new utilities J: / 'le" Wog •A• NORTF11 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 ea - NI NI - Prepared 13y: E. a. Rues 4 00■6, INC. land eurveyora CIRCLE PINES MN. 850114 -3(02$ 9180 LEXINC TAN- 'AVENUE NE. Tel. 186 -5556 Pax 1S6 -6001 (n st) 1 lnaf • so it. / • :• is tre.�. •.. • • • Memorandum DATE: February 3, 2004 TO: Jeff Smyser Q FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer -�v RE: Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583 Attached is the TKDA review dated February 3, 2004, of the submitted documents for the VFW site re- development. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this project. The project is in general conformance with the City of Lino Lakes standards. This has also been sent to Metro Land Surveyors. Please contact me with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583 Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: February 3, 2004 Comm. No. 12976 -002 Routing: The City of Lino Lakes has received revised documents providing for reconstruction of the existing VFW facility site located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Lois Lane and Lake Drive. This proposed site reconstruction was previously addressed in memorandums dated November 11, 2003, January 8, 2004, and January 15, 2004. The following review is based on the previous memorandums, and the following: 1. Revised full -size and 11" x 17" size Preliminary Plan sets (Sheets A1.1, U1, G1, D1), dated January 20, 2004, and received by the City of Lino Lakes on January 21, 2004. S2. Copy of a memo from Michael J. Thomas of DSGW Twin Cities dated December 4, 2003 regarding Conditions of Approval. The proposed Plan provides for demolition of the existing building and construction of a new building with improved driveways and parking facilities. The area of the site is approximately 2.25 acres. Comments provided in the previous memorandums remain effective as applicable, and are therefore included as needed within this Memorandum. • General Comments: General comments are as follows: 1. The proposed 2.25 acre site development shall be subject to the requirements of NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) as most recently adopted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the City of Lino Lakes. Because the site is less than 2.5 acres, a review and approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) will not be required. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must also be provided in accordance with MPCA requirements. The applicant has indicated that he is aware of this requirement and is in the process of preparing a submittal. 2. Because the property is adjacent to Lake Drive (County Road 23), the Plan will require the review and approval of Anoka County. The County provided review comments in a letter to the City dated September 22, 2003. Because the Site Plan has been revised since then, it is recommended that the County again review the proposed plans and provide comment. A summary of the County's comments from the September 22, 2003, letter are as follows: An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 Page 2 February 3, 2004 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • • The dedication of an additional 10 feet of right -of -way will be required for future reconstruction purposes. At this time, it is not proposed to construct a right turn lane into the property. However, increases in future traffic volumes and safety concerns may warrant such a requirement from the County in the future, and will be the responsibility of the property owner to construct if required by the County. An additional 10 feet of dedication is provided on the plan by the applicant. • Currently, there are three driveways to CSAH 23 from the property. A single access to CSAH 23 opposite 79th Street is proposed, and is acceptable to the County. The Applicant shall be aware, that pending any future improvements to CSAH 23, a raised median or limiting of full access to the driveway may eventually become a possibility. • Sight corner visibilities shall be maintained per City and County requirements. No plantings, berms, business signs, or other features may be installed within the right -of -way, and that any such features installed outside of the right -of -way must not compromise safe visibility. The site Landscape Plan shall consider this issue accordingly. • At the time of the County's review (September 22, 2003), a Grading and Erosion Control Plan had not yet been submitted. The County will require a Grading and Erosion Control Plan for review along with drainage calculations. • A permit from Anoka County will be required for any and all work within the County right -of- way, and a note stating this has been added to the plans. Provisions for restoration, traffic control, and safety as required by the County shall be incorporated into the Plans. 3. The proposed reconstruction is intended to occur simultaneously with the maintaining of operation of the existing facility. The Applicant must provide a work plan that provides for the construction and existing operation, including provisions for access, parking, construction limits, and keeping the existing building in service while the new building is constructed. 4. Existing well and septic locations on adjoining properties have been confirmed according to the applicant. The applicant states that minimum separation distances for the wells and septic systems from the proposed storm water ponds is attained for the plans as proposed. The separation distance shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health. Site Plan (Sheet A1.1): The following comments regarding the Site Plan are offered as follows: 1. The single access point from Lake Drive has been lined up directly across from 79th Street as required in previous comments, and is now acceptable. Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 3 February 3, 2004 2. Right of way lines on the plans (for both Lake Drive and Lois Lane) have been identified on the plans per previous comments. The applicant must dedicate all additional right of way as required, and has indicated that a deed will be filed prior to applying for a building permit (Condition No. 2 of DSGW memo). 3. Proposed improvement features should be labeled accordingly, including concrete curb and gutter. The type of concrete curb and gutter and pavement section design is not specified on any of the Plan sheets, but is identified on Sheet D1 (B612). The pavement section is also shown on D1, and should be labeled as the parking lot pavement section. Radius dimensions for the driveway entrances are provided. However, it is recommended that a 20 -ft. radius be provided at all driveway entrances, including at Lois Lane, consistent with City standards. 4. In addition to additional right of way dedication required by the County along Lake Drive, a 10 -foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated by the applicant around the perimeter of the property. An exception shall be the northeast portion of the property where the easement must expand to include the pond and detention area. The applicant has agreed to provide said easements per Condition No. 6 of the DSGW memo. A variance will be required to meet set -back distance requirements for the parking area and building from the newly dedicated right -of -way limits. 5. The proposed ponding area is essentially squeezed or "shoe- horned" into a narrow space between the parking lot and the adjacent property. This does cause some concerns with regards to possible encroachment into neighboring properties, and an immediate drop behind the curbing of the parking lot. Typically, a bench of sufficient width around a pond is needed to provide for adequate maintenance and access. As mentioned in the previous memorandum, there are concerns regarding maintenance and snow removal. 6 -foot privacy (wood fence) has been provided on the plan to protect and prevent encroachment and/or grading into the neighboring properties. The fence must be placed on the Applicant's side of the property line in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes. 6. An existing building and other structures must be removed to provide for the new construction. All existing fixtures shall be removed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes and the State of Minnesota, including foundations and any other underground fixtures that may exist such as storage tanks or other. In the event there are environmental issues such as contaminated soil and/or materials or other removal issues, the Applicant shall be responsible for complying with all environmental requirements of the City, County, and State as applicable. This also includes the abandoning and capping of wells and removal of septic systems as may be applicable. Grading Plan (Sheet GI): Comments with regards to the Grading Plan are as follows: 1. The building's main finished floor elevation has been provided as 909.8. The lowest building opening must be a minimum of 1 -foot higher than the emergency overflow elevation. Any basement floor elevations must be at least 4 -feet above the normal water elevation and 2 -feet above the design flood level. However, the applicant has indicated that there is no basement proposed for the building. Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 Page 4 February 3, 2004 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 2. Comments regarding the drainage calculations were provided in the January 15, 2003 memo. Revised calculations must be submitted and address the following specific items as previously identified: • Per the drainage diagram and calculations submitted, Subcatchments 2 and 3 (S2 and S3) were shown routing to Pond 1 (P1). However, per the utility plan, S2 discharges directly to the storm sewer rather than to the pond. In addition, Subcatchment 1 (S1) was shown discharging to a Pond 2 (P2), although no Pond 2 exists on the grading plan. In addition, the HydroCad model utilized a 6 -inch outlet whereas no outlet of such is shown on the utility plan. It should also be noted that no ponding is allowed within the County right -of -way. The calculations must be corrected and re- submitted. • The 2, 10, and 100 year proposed discharge rates may not exceed the 2, 10, and 100 -year existing discharge rates. If the orifice on the outlet is at the minimum 6 -inch size, the City shall review and determine if the proposed discharge rate is acceptable. Further review shall be conducted upon the receiving of revised calculations showing the corrected discharge rates. • A 10 -foot wide 10:1 bench is typically required at the normal water level for stormwater ponds. 3. Notes regarding seeding, mulching and turf establishment shall be provided and refer to the appropriate Mn/DOT Specification for turf establishment (2575) and for the seed mixture. The City of Lino Lakes has a specific seed specification for ponding areas and a note referring to City of Lino Lakes seeding specifications is provided on the plan. However, it is recommended that the actual specification and mix be included on the plans or detail sheet. 4. All grading shall be confined to the property, and a note has been added to the plans stating this. In addition, an existing retaining wall is located at the east property line. The applicant has stated that the retaining wall will be left in place and left undisturbed. If not, the Grading Plan must address this accordingly. 5. The Grading Plan suggests that at least some portions of the parking lot and driveways will drain directly to the neighboring streets (Lake Drive and Lois Lane). Additional spot elevations at the driveway entrances should be shown to verify the intended drainage patterns. 6. As previously stated, provisions for existing wells and septic systems shall be addressed on the Grading Plan in accordance with City and State of Minnesota requirements. Utility Plan (Sheet U1): The following comments can be made with regards to the Utility Plan: 1. Sanitary sewer and water currently exist in Lake Drive (12 -inch diameter water and 21 -inch diameter sanitary sewer). The Plans propose utilizing existing services to these mains. The size and condition of Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 Page 5 February 3, 2004 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota these services should be verified to assure their adequacy. The amount of filllcover over all sewer and water service pipes shall be a minimum bury depth of 8 feet, and shall be insulated per City of Lino Lakes standards if the minimum cover cannot be attained. 2. Per the plan, one fire hydrant exists adjacent to the site along Lake Drive and another on the south side of Lois Lane at Lake Drive. The Plan shall be subject to the review of the City Fire Chief, and the installation of additional hydrants may be required if required by the Fire Chief. 3. The Utility and Grading Plans propose connecting to the existing 21 -inch storm sewer pipe that runs beneath the edge of Lake Drive. Connection to the pipe will require a permit from Anoka County. The traffic control and restoration provisions in Note 8 on the utility plan shall also refer to the requirements of Anoka County, including permitting and restoration requirements. 4. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet. 5. A minimum of two feet of cover over storm sewer pipe is desired. 6. A proposed driveway apron is shown at the same location as the 6 -foot high wood privacy fence, per the request of the adjacent property owner according to the applicant. A gate, private access agreement, or other as agreed upon between the applicant and the adjacent property owner shall be provided as needed. Other: 1. A Geotechnical Report has not yet been provided. As previously mentioned, re- development of the site will require demolition of the existing building and removal of smaller buildings and surface features. There may also be underground items required for removal as well, including foundations, storage tanks, old septic systems, etc. as previously stated. The Applicant shall verify the existence of all surface and underground items and shall remove and dispose of those required in accordance with State and Local regulations. 2. The type of light fixtures proposed shall be subject to the approval of the City of Lino Lakes. 3. The previous review memorandum included comments regarding the Landscape Plan submitted (Sheet L1.0). Comments included that special consideration be given to assure that no plantings are installed over any existing or proposed utilities. Plantings shall not cause corner or other visibility problems. • Memo To: Michael Grochalla CC: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: November 4, 2003 Re: Recommendations of the October 29, 2003 Environmental Board Topic: Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583, 7868 Lake Drive, Site Plan Review Recommendations: The Environmental Board made the following recommendations of the VFW proposal at their;October 29, 2003 meeting: • Parking should be reduced to the city minimum, or the VFW should use pervious paving. • Soil- compaction protection measures should be used during construction. • Staff should confirm that the lighting plan conforms to city ordinance • Use City seed specifications for native plant areas. • Remove existing lighted sign. • Plant Northern pin oaks instead of Summit ash • Agree to clean exhaust vents in a non - polluting manner. • Develop a maintenance plan for native plant areas and frequent parking lot sweeping. Motion: Motion by Donlin, 2nd by Grundhoffer to recommend approval with the Environmental Board recommendations. All were in favor. Motion passed. • Page 2 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL B 2 S JAMES"' I 2 L 3 4 K 36 5 E 6 7 8 35 9 34 II I. 2 • s PROPOSED LAND USE LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Low Density Sewered Residential Commercial Stage 1 Growth Area Boundary Medium Density Residential Public /Semi - Public Low Density Unsewered Residential B -1 INNEN:: a 04 t ttt* ti )14 AA404141 Omani*, ,fin ellImmtom An MEM= aim EIN arB z tivdah.,,, LidElimmitaz iro-7,11 am. wst 0 9 10 11 t 2 3 4 5 0 7 $ 9 110 11 35 3133 2 • • Zodbv4 mU4p MEMO project Circle -Lex VFW, Lino Lakes, MN project # 03098 subject Conditions of Approval date December 04, 2003 from Michael J. Thomas, DSGW Twin Cities to Jeff Smyser, City Planner, Lino Lakes cc Dean Johnson, Commander Circle -Lex VFW Brian Bourassa, Metro Engineering Nate Rowe, DSGW Twin Cities Joe Watson, DSGW Duluth 548 Apollo Drive, Suite to Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 tel 651-784-7924 fax 651-784-7925 mmro.degw.com RECEIVED JAN 2 1 2004 CITY OF LINO LAKES Pursuant to the "Conditions of Approval" of the Planning & Zoning Board's approval of this project, please accept the following response and comments. Condition No.1 The owner agrees to combine the separate parcels into one. Documentation of lot combination filing to Anoka will be provided prior to building permit submittal. Condition No.2 The owner understands and agrees to the additional right of way dedication to Anoka County for Lake Drive. A deed will be filed prior to building permit submittal. Condition No.3 The Lake Drive driveway will be aligned with 796 Street. See attached revised plan on sheets A1.1, G1 & U1. Condition No. 4 The location of existing wells on adjacent residential properties has been verified by Metro Land Surveying and Engineering and are shown on revised sheets G1 and U1 . A 50' separation between said existing wells and proposed storm water ponds will be met. See comments from Brian Bourassa attached. Condition No. 5 Please find attached "Temporary Parking Plan, Sheet A1.2 ". (25) temporary spaces are possible as indicated with access from Lois Lane. If additional parking is needed, on street parking on 79`h street is possible. C: \WINNT\Profiles \mthomas.000 \Desktop \03098 conditions.doc Page 1 of 4 enriching communities through architecture • • MEMO 548 Apollo Drive. Suite to Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 tel 651.784-7924 fax 651.784-7925 wuvw.d$gw.com Condition No. 6 The owner agrees to provide drainage and utility easements over all ponds. Deeds shall be provided prior to building permit submittal. Condition No. 7 The owner agrees to connect to city water and sanitary sewer and pay appropriate charges. The plans shown utilities being connected. Condition No. 8 Existing septic system and wells will be abandoned under the construction contract. Our specifications will highlight legal requirements. DSGW is contracted for con §truction administration of this project and can request documentation of this work. Condition No. 9 See attached "Revised Plant List ". The "vide" plantings are listed in the revised list. Condition No. 10 We agree to city native seeding. Please send us or notify us where we can obtain the native seed schedule. We will place it in our specifications. Condition No. 11 I will answer comments regarding Sheet A1.1, which was prepared by DSGW. Other City Engineer comments will be addressed under the attached comment form Brian Bourassa of Metro Land Surveying and Engineering. Sheet A1.1 Comments 1. The driveway on Lake Drive will be revised to align with 79`h. See attached revised drawing A1.1 2. The right of way lines will be identified as existing and proposed. See attached revised drawing A1.1 3. Proposed improvements are labeled and additional dimensions and radius's are provided. See attached revised drawings A1.1. Other site construction related details will be provided on Civil Sheets. See attached sheet Dl. 4. There is no basement. Finish floor elevations shall comply with normal water elevations and design flood level. C: \WINNTProfiles \mthomas.000 \Desktop \03098 conditions.doc Page 2 of 4 enriching communities through architecture MEMO 548 Apollo Drive. Suite 10 Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 tel 651-784-7924 fax 651-784.7925 www.dagw.eom 5. The agrees to provide required easements. The variances for setbacks are discussed elsewhere in the approval. 6. DSGW Architect's has not traditionally provided bar scales on architectural drawings, however a bar scale and north arrow are shown on the attached revised sheet A1.1. 7. The revised sheet Al.l will show additional fencing as noted. 8. Demolition of existing buildings/ structures and abandonment of wells and septic will be directed under our specifications to meet all legal requirements noted. Condition No. 12 A stop sign has been added and is shown on the attached revised sheet A1.1. Condition No. 13 All necessary permits will be obtained from Anoka County for Lake Drive right of way. Condition No. 14 We have transferred the lighting locations from the previously submitted photometric plan to the attached revised sheet A1.1. Condition No. 15 Signage is not being submitted at this time. The owner understands and agrees to apply for required sign permit(s) prior installing new signs. The existing pole mounted site sign will be removed and will not be re- installed. Condition No. 16 The owner agrees to entire into a site performance agreement. Condition No. 17 The owner agrees to a mutual cross - access easement with property to the north. Condition No. 18 The owner understands that the city may impose additional parking or traffic requirements in the future. Condition No. 19 C: \WINNT\Profles\mthomas .000 \Desktop \03098 conditions.doc Page 3 of 4 0nriching communities through architecture 548 Apollo Drive, Suite io Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 tef 651-784-7924 fax 651-784-7925 www.dagw.com MEMO The plans indicate the setbacks as approved. Encl: (1) Metro Letter 01/20/04 (1) Revised Plant List (1) 8 1/2"x11" 11" Sheet A1.2 Temporary Parking Plan (1) 11 "x17" Sheet A1.1 (5) 24 "x36" Sheet A1.1 (1) 11 "x17" Sheet G1 (5) 24 "x36" Sheet G1 (1) 11 "x17" Sheet U1 (5) 24 "x36" Sheet Ul (1) 11 "x17" Sheet D1 (5) 24 "x367 Sheet Dl END OF MEMO C: \WINNT\Profiles\mthomas .000 \Desktop \03098 conditions.doc Page 4 of 4 enriching communities through architecture METRO LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING January 20, 2004 Mr. Jim Studenski, P.E. Lino Lakes City Engineer 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Revised Plan Submittal CIRCLE/LEX VFW — LINO LAKES, MN Dear Mr. Studenski: We have reviewed the TKDA Project Review Memo dated January 8, 2004 and have the following comments: General Comments: 1. We are currently in the Contractor selection process and once completed we will finalize the NPDES submittal. 2. The modified Plat drawing identifies the additional 10' of dedicated ROW as requested by Anoka County. Site Plan Comments: 1. The modified Plans have aligned the access point along CSAH 23 so that it lines up with 79th Street. 2. The modified Plans identify the existing and proposed ROW lines. 3. The modified Plans identify the proposed construction features and include a detail sheet for the required construction items. 4. There is no basement or crawl space associated with this building. Therefore, the finished floor elevation of 909.8 is the lowest building opening. The pond HWL is identified as 905.2. 5. The modified Plans include an additional 10' Drainage and Utility Easement around the perimeter of the site. Twin City Office: 412 East County Road D Little Canada, MN 55117 Phone (651) 766 -0112 Fax (651) 766 -0612 E -mail survey@metrols.com Pine City Office: 1639 Main Street North - Suite 7 Pine City, MN 55063 Phone (320) 629 -3267 Fax (320) 629 -0176 E -mail metropc@ecenet.com Anoo,•c nfro, 12110 Fletcher Lane North - Unit B Rogers, MN55374 Phone (763) 428 -5130 Fax (763) 428 -5172 • 6. The modified Plans include a north arrow and bar scale. 7. The modified Plans include the relocation and extension of the 6' privacy fence in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes. The proposed ponding was located on the northern and eastern property edges to provide a buffer to the neighbors and to best align with the proposed parking lot development. At this time, a plan . for the snowplowing effort has not been completed. However, it is anticipated that snow removed from the driveway entrance and the south parking lot will be stored adjacent to Lois Lane (to the south). A portion of the snow removed from the north parking lot will be stored in the ponding areas. The City concerns regarding this item have been reviewed with the owner. 8. The removal of all existing structures will be completed in accordance with the City of Lino Lakes and the State of MN requirements. These requirements will be outlined in our Project Specifications. Grading Plan Comments: 1. The modified Plans include General Construction Notes related to NPDES, City requirements, seeding, etc. 2. At this time, we have not received any review comments from the County of Anoka. When the Anoka County comments are received, the pipe ownership will be verified and documented. 3. As stated above, we are in the process of preparing our NPDES submittal. When this document is completed, we will forward the application and SWPP to the City Engineer for review. Due to the required parking lot configuration, the location of the stormwater pond is confined to the northern and eastern property edges. In order to meet the required hydrologic design criteria (storage volume and discharge rates), it was necessary to eliminate the 10:1 bench. 4. Erosion control measures are shown on the modified Plans. 5. The modified Plans include a note stating that all required the City Engineer shall approve imported material. 6. The modified Plans include a note stating that all tree clearing and grubbing shall be completed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes and MnDOT 2101. 7. The modified Plans include notes regarding the placement of 4" of topsoil on all disturbed areas and refers to the City of Lino Lakes Ponding Seed Mixture requirement. The Landscaping Plan and Specification addresses all additional turf re- establishment criteria and will reference MnDOT 2575 and the City of Lino Lakes requirements. 8. All proposed grading and drainage features will be confined to the VFW Site, Lois Lane ROW and Lake Drive ROW. No additional grading and drainage features are proposed to be constructed on the adjacent properties. The existing retaining wall located along the eastern edge of the property is proposed to remain in place and left undisturbed. 9. The modified Plan includes additional spot elevations have been provided along Lake Drive and Lois Lane to verify the intended drainage patterns. Twin City Office: 412 East County Road D Little Canada, MN 55117 Phone (651) 766 -0112 Fax (651) 766 -0612 E -mail survey@metrols.com Pine City Office: 1639 Main Street North - Suite 7 Pine City, MN 55063 Phone (320) 629 -3267 Fax (320) 629 -0176 E -mail metropc @ecenet.com _ , _. - , _._ _ *r__.r rr -:. A A.,onvv ]UN 5 S ?7d Phone 1763) 428 -5130 Fax (763) 428 -5172 • • 10. The modified Plans include notes regarding the abandonment of the existing well and septic system (in accordance with the City of Lino Lakes and State of MN requirements). Utility Plan Comments: 1. The modified Plan Set includes existing pipe size and depth information. We will be providing the modified drainage calculations to TKDA Engineers to verify the drainage conditions for the Project. 2. Existing hydrants are located at the intersection of Lois Lane and Lake Drive (SE Corner) and at the northwest corner of the driveway entrance for the Project and Lake Drive (as shown on the modified Plan Set). 3. The Project construction will require a permit from Anoka County. Traffic control will be in accordance with the requirements of Anoka County (as noted on the modified Plan Set). 4. The Project Specification includes information regarding the required trench and roadway compaction requirements. 5. The modified Plan Set includes a note regarding the required watermain appurtenance specifications. Additionally, City of Lino Lakes standard plates are included on detail sheet Dl. 6. No comment regarding this item. 7. The modified Plan Set includes a reference to the Gopher State One Call. 8. Same as Item No. 3. 9. The modified Plan Set includes a note regarding the City of Lino Lakes Utility Superintendent. 10. The proposed driveway apron is included in the Project at the request of the adjacent neighbor. The exact location of the driveway will be field verified and a gate will be required to access the neighbor's rear yard. Other: 1. When the geotechnical report is available it will be provided to the City Engineer. All site removal and abandonment items will be completed in accordance with the City of Lino Lakes ad the State of MN requirements (as included in the Project Specification). 2. No comment regarding this item. 3. No comment regarding this item. Extra Comment Items: 1. The adjacent neighbor septic systems were field verified and are identified on the modified Plan Set (> 50' from ponding area). Additionally, the existing wells for the parcels are located in the front yards of the adjacent residences (» 50' from ponding area). • Please contact me at (763) 428 -5130 if you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, *AA.. Brian J. Bourassa, P.E. Project Manager Rogers Office Metro Land Surveying & Engineering 12510 Fletcher Lane North, Ste. B Rogers, MN 55374 • • • • { u u O O C] 00 C] 00 =,;;; C] CO z z OV C] co 03 0 f 00 C] V V e"1 N 1 O O O 0 J J • IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST CATHEDRAL ELM w a_ • z W a' W m a' W 04 W a m d'?• O= S W Z V :' Y Y U LL a • °r` < o z in W J Itl --1'.; Z o- Z SEE SPECIFICATIONS SEE SPECIFICATIONS HYDROSEED 1 J jiii N Z at 1 ss3g 1' =1 J NO W W q a i 21 « 1 Iga0 3- 11111"1 u >a 1 1 18© 1 1 a v r977O1 9.29,•9.O011 Zow m LSIO3 3z m z �inoGc� °` 3 up B,uFZ e z '� W Y. D W Z 0 0 J 0 la p Z W 442O 0y1 J OC O. m Z OC 0> 6° 0 = V _. z 7 C o=eWzZ3,a , c� z°� p gyp— W0 Z WCA Z0°G *- zv�2,�, p��z ob aQ og g?QOz D00 ozneizo zm ' 2 O6c4 FEW jOOCWM 0001 - ��a zoo3 z�3m�zn� z.c.0 p ss:gu r,ttisOg .11“001 gun r.ar,14,0s Muumuu • E1 CEP Or 1 0 K, W z z �L1 z H\ U off: 'S3)If<l ONI'I - MOW 0011131111SNO3 Hod 330 ION on 2 (o sr/44i W9C AHV N111111136 d \ 50 I J JWP� I II �" . \ \ \ �� H . \ h \ \ 0 00'51106 CO /BI /LI am 01003001V1 530Y 0011 -40 A310 09991 1SOd AIWA X31 /31OUIO NV1d DNIQVHD 8N888I3 ar Eilird 1 1 } pl{ 3L6,4111- LOINONd OAKS !BI 130/1 0NN 01 3IB15 LO O1100/ BK MF78G 03d013n30/173010 ibg 1:e if ins :i f 31040 -{[4 I; 4 I• RJii a � � 3i !r 5d A RI §4 14 WiA 114f A. rgt , Y illi 111 Iiiigi 6 6.i;11 1! p ;E iE !!!! §.�fi .C3 Y¢F x Ii .lil E22 ixP §f ▪ 3 4g [g!sFi ^eb 56$ ¢i i n 3a 3sa ill lig iib ° L 5j 6•aia i• 6 • 1 16 i 45g §as Iii spK a ss�� .)b� `� � i 66F b5F °s � 6 sgA ! fifiS z y5 fifi4 u y 1 §l•§ §'211 611 dfl •0� p3. bliZ /f §E§ /111 E §§ -ill Si. ie 4 id 12144111 V311171 0417 Matti i PP t tl ll 1 it V10S3NN161 '53001 ONII JO AID E899# iSOd Mdn X31 /3lOHlO NV1d .W1LLf1 ii a i s 11111 11 1 e "1 � 11 le b' oopesg I I ®j O 1 *100S 'NM '530/1 ONO 01 311115 '31010 001040 0f5 030013130/03100 AS s/.•0/33n30 ��I�i : i f • ij 1 ° +ifi I{ ii A 11�' �€ ifF'li ii 9ILttt i � - 0 je g�- I � 6 i i i� L(f 1 j ip „i5 wj; i g ] !idol 5 1 j;i i=� ;j? i i i' i4 iR �, 'I! Iwo t 11.1 1 /1 !Pill! + ji ! a w I ill ! :Li ; ;1 3'1 if l 1; hi' Ye CFOE III iL'`:f 3 rqgs it II 111 ,i!p�� rfz 1l H; !.f it �iiiE l 1 1' 3�f1� 5){ lejl it ��i�JJjb �� ,15Lj r ,li�!Il �i sbi;ll '� i3, Ili LLI OUTLET STRUC A1��Pl'e �RI� y � / I�i�1i�n�d�Np�060i 1 e. O: \ aiv,ali 1 o. r iabatEritt �Int , � I'+ C.) w 9 Z. 0 • `p. • t; Q. I! it... 0 d Z II . CC BARESESSIVI 0 laemoomeopmeami IMOBNIMINEONNIMINI • 1 U W 3 t a =n ai11 ui =n a=n II "mum. (ii a 11 ai n = 11 a = Rol IF i =11 a =nu=n MIMI 111111 iia11uan1E11 INC IPA 11=11 tin IMO 11111111 gg 35 nz 1 31 6 J :. U t/1 a 0, is C >a 5 F x I �`$ 10 0 fjAll II II 1111. a f S W 'ENVY ON17- *`1!49 N L IYbt5N00 HDd 3S11 ION Za- [1)1 -z1 '11LLticli'Sjs -G aa. V II 0 0 sB9 S89'06 08 z (pp� GG 2 {p7 2 2 pQ�] tm� m m -. J J o o N N tm7,7nf.m i•.0in '4 • I IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST. CATHEDRAL ELM I: • HOPA CRABAPPLE - . GLOSSY BLACK CHOKEBERRY BLACKHAWVIBURNUM PRINCE OF WALES JUNIPER GOLDFLAME SPI REA • SNOW IN SUMMER . STEUA DE ORO DAYUU ES i 0 • FRAXINUS PENNSYWANICA'SUMMIT 'I GLEDISTSIA TRIACANTHOS' IMPCOLE' g 0 W • Q 1 • I AROMA MELONOCARPA •• • VIBURNUM PRUNIFODUM J UNI PERUS HORIZONTAUS 'PRINCE OF WALES' I SPIREA X BUMADA'GOLDFLAME :. CERASTI UM TOMENTOSUM HEMEROCALUS'STELIA DE ORO' 'STONE MULCH WITH WEED BARRIER - • vmmN..nrvIRPP 1 M7x : ffr,I9.OpN 0 00r sr • Ot 4 (0 ° �aj U lIii Iiid '1 13 4 lip � h s4 1$5! E `E 8i iii ! � fi $s 144 14 '41$1 ■ Z `y gi g °s 1-1111 14 ' gs 5' 1.4 ev, x t Z Poli ils A ii ■ . r ti Oj :1A i-43i,'s 1M ., O 11 Eti6 1 3� s - .swill a� eies 6 !E ° -A1t 3111 -1E�a `t1ty!IE /1 C !..q91511 a a 6 Q ;:b €5$ a.! .sl914 a6 °�igF °£, Iia�,gzq 33 i 91s8Xlh lai w., N. r 41,4f -47 e�yo 4,), • •• boo Ny:> • • • F. • W.54 W C I@ iIi if! lib 1 0 00 w S C1011111 ��veneoe Ia iJ OTAL GROSS SF • • • AGENDA ITEM 7E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: February 9, 2004 TOPIC: Second Reading: Ordinance 02 -04 Rezoning Site from R -4, High Density Residential to R -3, Medium Density Residential Northeast Corner Lake Drive and Aqua Lane. VOTE: 3/5 BACKGROUND The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 02 -04 on January 26. The subject site is four acres of property at the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane, adjacent to the existing Marshan Lake Condominiums. The entire Marshan Lake Condominiums site and the remaining four -acres along Lake Drive is guided Medium Density Residential. The site is zoned R -4, a high - density zone. This is not consistent with the comprehensive plan's Medium Density classification. To address this inconsistency, Ordinance 02 -04 amends the zoning ordinance to rezone the site to R -3 to bring it into conformance with the comprehensive plan. Upon approval of the second reading, the ordinance will be published on February 17th and become effective 30 days after publication. OPTIONS 1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance 02 -04, rezoning the site from R -4 High Density to R -3 Medium Density. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 02-04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LAKE DRIVE AND AQUA LANE FROM R -4, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO R -3, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1 Findings The Lino Lakes City Council hereby makes the following findings: 1. The City of Lino Lakes approved its current comprehensive plan in August 2002 with Resolution No. 02 -103. The comprehensive plan was prepared and approved as required and enabled by Minnesota Statutes 462.351- 462.356 and Minnesota Statutes 473.851- 473.869. 2. The City of Lino Lakes approved its current zoning ordinance in March 2003 with Ordinance No. 08 -03. The zoning ordinance was prepared and approved as required and enabled by Minnesota Statutes 462.357. 3. The comprehensive plan includes a Proposed Land Use plan guiding land within the City of Lino Lakes for specified land uses. 4. The comprehensive plan guides a four -acre site at the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane for land use category Medium Density Residential: 3 -6 units per acre. 5. The site is zoned R -4, High Density Residential. Under the current zoning ordinance, R -4 is intended for the High Density land use category: 6 -12 units per acre. 6. Under the current zoning ordinance, the R -3, Medium Density Residential zoning district is intended for the Medium Density land use category: 3 -6 units per acre. 7. Therefore, the current R -4 zoning is not consistent with the current Medium Density land use category in the comprehensive plan. Such inconsistencies should be corrected by amending either the zoning or the comprehensive plan. 8. Minnesota Statutes 473.858 and 473.865 require that official controls are to be amended so as not to conflict with the comprehensive plan. 9. The High Density land use category, which would allow for development of up to 12 units /acre, is not consistent with the existing townhome neighborhood, which is 6.4 Ordinance 02 -04, page 2 • • • units /acre. Medium Density, which allows 3 -6 units /acre, will allow development that will be very close to and thus consistent with the existing neighborhood. 10. The City Council considered an application to amend the comprehensive plan to change the land use category for the site from Medium to High Density. The City Council decided, with Resolution 04 -01, to deny the amendment to the land use. 11. The site should be rezoned to R -3, Medium Density Residential, to be consistent with the comprehensive plan land use classification of Medium Density. 12. The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on the rezoning on January 14, 2004, and recommended approval of the rezoning. 13. The rezoning action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The current R -4 High Density Zoning conflicts with the Medium Density land use category of the comprehensive plan. The purpose of the rezoning is to correct this inconsistency between the comprehensive plan and the zoning. State statute requires that official controls found to be in conflict with the comprehensive plan must be amended so as not to conflict. 14. The R -3 zoning is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The surrounding neighborhood was developed at approximately 6.4 units per acre. The Wenzel Farms townhomes across Lake Drive were built at approximately 5 units per acre. A High Density land use category would provide for 6 to 12 units per acre. A Medium Density category allows up to 6 units per acre. Six units per acre is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 15. This rezoning action is not based on a specific proposed use. It is intended to correct a conflict between the zoning ordinance and the comprehensive plan. 16. Development according to R -3 zoning can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity, and traffic generation by the R -3 zoning is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Projects built according to R -3 Medium Density Residential standards will pose less burden on existing services and infrastructure than R -4 High Density Residential projects. Section 2 The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City Council on March 10, 2003 is hereby amended by rezoning from R -4, High Density Residential to R -3, Medium Density Residential, pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, for the subject real estate described in Attachment A. Section 3 As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Ordinance 02 -04, page 3 • Section 4 This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk • • John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ordinance 02 -04, page 4 411 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ATTACHMENT A, ORDINANCE 02 04 Page 1 Parcels 1 and 2 (Commercial Parcel): That part of Government Lot 2, Section 20 and that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, all in Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the north 849.40 feet of the west 240.00 feet of said Government Lot 2 (for the purposes of this description the west line of said Government Lot 2 is assumed to have a bearing of South 00 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds West); thence North 82 degrees 52 minutes 55 seconds East, a distance of 38.49 feet; thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds West, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 2, a distance of 184.36 feet to the point of beginning of the property to be described; thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds West, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 2, a distance of 233.22 feet to the north line of the south 60.00 feet of said Government Lot 2; thence North 89 degrees 20 minutes 25 seconds West, along said north line, a distance of 278.18 feet to the east line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19; thence North 73 degrees 00 minutes 17 seconds West. a distance of 87.11 feet to the easterly right —of —way line of Lake Drive (formerly known as State Trunk Highway No. 49); thence North 17 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East along said easterly right —of —way line, a distance of 217.83 feet to the intersection with a line drawn' westerly, parallel with the north line of said Government Lot 2 and its westerly extension, from the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 07 seconds East. along said parallel line, a distance of 295.52 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 3 (Existing Description for Farm Parcel): All that part of Government Lot 2, Section 20, Township 31, Range 22, lying within the following described tract: Beginning at the southeast corner of the north 849.40 feet of the west 240.00 feet of said Government Lot 2; thence North 82 degrees 52 minutes 55 seconds East, assumed bearing system, 38.49 feet; thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds West, parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 2, 184.36 feet; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 07 seconds West, parallel with the north line of said Government Lot 2, 295.52 feet. more or less to the intersection with the easterly right —of —way line of Lake Drive; thence North 17 degrees 58 minutes East along said easterly right —of —way line 187.90 feet, more or less to the intersection with the south line of the north 849.40 feet of said Government Lot 2; thence south 89 degrees 29 minutes 07 seconds East along said south line of the north 849.00 feet, 200.33 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. Parcels 4 and 5 (Existing Description): The south 145.00 feet of the north 849.40 feet of the west 240.00 feet of Government Lot 2, Section 20, Township 31, Range 22, City of Lino Lakes. Anoka County, Minnesota which lies east of the easterly right—of—way line of Lake Drive (formerly known as State Trunk Highway No. 49). Remainder Parcel: (Parcel 6) That part of Government Lot 2, Section 20, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of the north 849.40 feet of the west 240.00 feet of said Government Lot 2 (for the purposes of this description the west line of said Government Lot 2 is assumed to have a bearing of South 00 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds West); thence North 82 degrees 52 minutes 55 seconds East, a distance of 38.49 feet; thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds West. parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 2, a distance of 103.39 feet to a point on said parallel line distant 314.19 feet northerly of the point of intersection of said parallel line with the north line of the south 60.00 feet of said Government Lot 2; thence northerly along a curve concave to the east, said curve is tangent to said parallel line, has a radius of 230.00 feet and a central angle of 17 degrees 39 minutes 52 seconds, a distance of 70.91 feet; thence North 17 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 199.84 feet; thence North 71 degrees 00 minutes 13 seconds West. a distance of 246.54 feet to the easterly right —of —way line of Lake Drive, said easterly right —of —way line is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of said Government Lot 2, distant 354.43 feet easterly of the northwest corner thereof, for the purposes of this description, the west line of said Government Lot 2 is assumed to bear South 00 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds West; thence South 25 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 118.98 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast. having a radius of 2819.22 feet and a central angle of 07 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 385.44 feet; thence South 17 degrees 58 minutes 00 seconds West. tangent to said curve, a distance of 532.41 feet to the west line of said Government Lot 2, and there terminating. thence southerly along said easterly right —of —way line, a distance of 99.93 feet to the intersection with the south line of the north 704.40 feet of said Government Lot 2; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 07 seconds East along said south line, a distance of 154.21 feet to the east line of the west 240.00 feet thereof thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds West, along said east line, a distance of 145.00 feet to the point of beginning. SCALE IN FEET FILE riEe OCT CITY OF I. , , I -Anoka Coupty Monument at ATTACHMENT A o NW. � cif Govt Lot 2. Sec. 20. T. 31, 8.122 & `` - - - -- N. Line of Govt Lot 2, Sec. 20, T r\� NE. Car. of the NE1 /4 of the NE1 /4 of Se4 19. T. 31. R. 22 libRDINANCE 02 04 0o I / S 89'29'orE • page 2 iri / I No 2 / 1 l 1 S ' / 246 731- I 54 / / I' 101 $ 89'29'07111 Parcel 6 �!}I /47 __I 154.21 (Remainder Parcel 1 ^Y (26,893 Sq. FL) l `� I ` N I r - - -- - I 4i I o o`)i Parcels & v I 0 o, — (25.704 q. Ft) • I \ , / V i \ ..............."'d / I i- S 8979'07'1. j j -N 24Q01 Li_ / ; 200.33 /1 SE. Car of the N. 649.40 of the W. 240.00 -- c / / of Govt Lot 2 , Bic. 20, T. 31, R. 22 -- 3°r/ • / i / I Sri /14 i I • �c P I • Parcel 3 i (Farm Parcel o e / / :3.-e4 if j (47,485 Sq. Ft °o O' ' :fir,, e O ,, 1 O 30 0 / e� z (4.05 Acres) ZS" o L' (3 parcels combined) \ /S 89 °29 07 E i o / /17.34 ; , �� O Li / ��- _� 278.18 �7- I . �/\ ` ( / I - S 89•29.07-E �/ ` / 1 .7.......s......... °o V I I— o to I 0 Z `J Vy P I s ' 5 iO Zr_ °h N PO I *N NO ° e / ^N o i ....C4 Z .x Parcels 1 & 2 • _ �= 1 z� o O (Commercial Parcel) / / ,? c ° (76.281 Sq. Ft) d1 0 ic�l e • g O i4c. I -8 t; p i `� ) i `I / i : `` I . N. Line of the S. 60.00 O\ Cov t Lot 2, Sec. 20, T. 31, R. 22 .11 1 IIT s!„ 4 HIS SURVEY. PLAN D BY ME OR UNDER ND THAT I AM A / 278.18 N 118970'25'W o to 60 AQUA LANE , T -SW. Car. of Govt Lot 2, Sec. 2V. T. 31, R. 22 -- Line of Govt Lot 2 Sec. 20, T. 31, , • • AGENDA ITEM 7F STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 9, 2004 TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -22, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 2004 Wearing Course Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The City undertakes a paving project each year to place the final layer of bituminous, known as the wearing course, in those developments where the majority of the lots have been built on. The funding for this work is provided by assessments to the respective subdivisions. The estimated total project cost is $78,000.00. The subdivisions receiving wearing course this year include the final portion of Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition and Clearwater Creek 5th Addition. The schedule for this project is as follows: City Council Authorizes Plans and Specifications City Council Approves Plans and Specifications City Council Authorizes Ad for Bids Open Bids City Council Awards Contract Construction Begins February 9, 2004 March 22, 2004 March 22, 2004 April, 2004 May, 2004 June, 2004 OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -22, authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2004 Wearing Course Project. 3. Not adopt Resolution Number 04 -22. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution Number 04 -22 be adopted. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -22 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2004 WEARING COURSE. WHEREAS, it is proposed to place a final layer of bituminous in developments where the majority of lots have been built on; WHEREAS, it is proposed to finance the project using assessments from the respective subdivisions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer is designated as the engineer for this improvement and he is directed to prepare plans and specifications for the 2004 Wearing Course. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of February, 2004. Ann J. Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • AGENDA ITEM 7G STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 9, 2004 TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -23, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 2004 Sealcoat Project Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Each year the City maintains its streets by sealcoating. Sealcoating places a thin layer of oil and rock on the street to enhance the surface. Candidate streets include new streets that received the wear course 2 - 3 years ago and all other streets are done on a 5 - 7 year cycle. This year, approximately 5 miles of streets will be sealcoated at an estimated total project cost of $77,000. The 2004 budget includes $61,000 for sealcoating. The difference between the annual City budget amount and the total bid amount would be funded from the City's Sealcoat fund as this reflects the cost of the first time sealing of new roadways. The schedule for this project is as follows: City Council Authorizes Plans and Specifications City Council Approves Plans and Specifications City Council Authorizes Ad for Bids Open Bids City Council Awards Contract Construction Begins February 9, 2004 March 22, 2004 March 22, 2004 April, 2004 May, 2004 June, 2004 OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -23, authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2004 Sealcoat project. 3. Not adopt Resolution Number 04 -23. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution Number 04 -23 be adopted. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -23 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2004 SEALCOAT PROJECT. WHEREAS, it is proposed to perform maintenance activities on several city streets, and WHEREAS, it is proposed to finance the project using Sealcoating Funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer is designated as the engineer for this improvement and he is directed to prepare plans and specifications for the 2004 Sealcoat project. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of February, 2004. Ann J. Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor