HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/14/2004 Council Packet•
AMENDED AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday,
June 14, 2004
Council Chambers
5:30 p.m.
Liquor Violations Hearing
City Council meeting
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
Open Mike
- Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
State of the City Address, Mayor Bergeson
• 1. Consent Agenda -
•
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) June 14, 2004 (Check No. 71064 through 71234 in the amount of
$637,247.37). Pg. 4 -19
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14271 through 14315 in the
amount of $42,292.59). Pg. 20
B) Consider Resolution 04 -85, Approving Application for Temporary 3.2
Percent Malt Liquor License, Approving Application for a Cabaret
License and an Exemption for Lawful Gambling Permit for August
Festival, St. Joseph Catholic Church. Pg. 21 -22
2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek
A) None.
3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A) 2004 -2005 Council Goals, Gordon Heitke
Pg. 23 -31
AMENDED AGENDA
B) Consider Authorizing Action Pursuant to Annual Liquor License
Compliance Checks, Following Violation Hearing, Ann Blair
i. Resolution No. 04 -86, Finding Violation and Assigning Penalty,
Miller's on Main
ii. Resolution No. 04 -87, Finding Violation and Assigning
Penalty,American Legion
iii. Resolution No. 04 -88, Finding Violation and Assigning Penalty,
the VFW
iv. Resolution No. 04 -89, Finding Violation and Assigning Penalty,
the Oasis Market
Pg. 32 -38E
4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
A) None.
5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
A) Consider Second Reading of Ordinance 14 -04, Amending City Code to
Include Water Sprinkling Ban, Rick DeGardner Pg. 39 -43
6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala
• A) Resolution No. 04 -77 Approving Economic Development Advisory
Committee Action Plan, Mary Divine Pg. 44 -61
•
B) Resolution No. 04 -78, Supporting Application for Metropolitan Council
Livable Communities Opportunity Grant, I -35E AUAR, Mary Divine
Pg. 62 -72
C) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 07 -04, Vacating Drainage and
Utility Easement, for property located at 125 Ash Street (Rice Creek
Covenant Church), Jeff Smyser Pg. 73 -76
D) Public Hearing, Consider 1St Reading of Ordinance No. 09 -04, Vacating
Drainage and Utility Easement, Millers Crossroads, Jim Studenski
Pg. 77 -80
E) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -84, Denying Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat, Fox Den Acres, Jeff Smyser
Pg. 81 -110
F) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -80, Accepting Plans and Authorizing
Advertisement for Bids, Marshan Lane Utility Improvement Project, Jim
Studenski Pg. 111 -118
•
•
AMENDED AGENDA
Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -81, Rejecting All Bids,
Birch/Hodgson Street Improvement Project, Jim Studenski
Pg. 119 -127
H) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -82, Establishing No Parking on Holly
Drive, Holly Drive Improvement Project, Jim Studenski
Pg. 128 -129
I) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -83, Accepting Feasibility Study and
Calling for Hearing on Improvements, Legacy at Woods Edge
Improvement Project, Michael Grochala/Bob Moberg (SEH)
Pg. 130A -130B
J) Public Hearing, Consider 1St Reading of Ordinance 03 -04, Vacating
Drainage and Utility Easements and Accepting New Easements, Lot 2,
Block 1, Oak Brook Peninsula, Jim Studenski (Continue Public Hearing
to June 28, 2004 City Council Meeting) Pg. 131
7. Unfinished Business
A) Approval of minutes of March 22, 2004 City Council Meeting
8. New Business
A) Approval of minutes of May 10, 2004 City Council Meeting
B) Approval of minutes of May 19, 2004 Council Work Session
C) Approval of minutes of May 24, 2004 City Council Meeting
D) Approval of minutes of May 27, 2004 Special City Council Meeting
9. Community Calendar, June 15, 2004 through June 28, 2004:
A) Special P &Z Board Meeting, Wednesday, June 16, 2004, 6:30 p.m.
B) Council Work Session, Wednesday, June 23, 2004, 5:30 p.m.
C) County Road 14 I -35W to I -35E Study, Public Information Meeting #3,
Thursday, June 24, 2004, 5:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at Chomonix Golf Course
located at 646 Sandpiper Drive, Lino Lakes, Minnesota.
D) City Council Meeting, Monday, June 28, 2004, 6:30 p.m.
10. Adjourn
•
•
Revised 06/04/04 DLB 11:19 a.m.
AMENDED AGENDA
EXPENDITURES
JUNE 14, 2004
Date: 05/20/2004 Time: 12:32:21
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 3959 3959
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 1
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 176.20 176.20 .00 .00
000539 TARGET 1 106.45 106.45 .00 .00
000698 KEY LAND HOMES 1 1,500.00 .1,500.00 .00 .00
000764 SISKA GROUP, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00
001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 556.07 556.07 .00 .00
001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 96.62 96.62 .00 .00
001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 50.00 50.00 .D0 .00
002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 420.00 420.00 .00 .00
002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00
0 1 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 1 416.00 416.00 .00 ..00
II) XCEL ENERGY 1 5,244.78 5,244.78 .00 .00
004660 URICH, TRACEY 1 79.95 79.95 .00 .00
005013 CAMBRIDGE TRUE VALUE 1 77.70 77.70 .00 .00
005014 ANDOVER AREA LACROSSE ASSOCIATION 1 556.00 556.00 .00 .00
900058 HANSON BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 15 10,299.77 .10,299.77 .00 .00 *.
Date: 05/27/2004 Time: 09:26:54 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 3978 3979
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net . Gross Discount Lost
000080 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 1 55.28 55.28 .00 .00
000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 2 1,072.03 1,072.03 .00 .00
000109 POSER, STEVEN G. AND GAIL E. 1 6,750.00 6,750.00 .00 :00
000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 49.00 49.00 .00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 1 41.54 41.54 .00 .00
000225 WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH, INC. 1 29.31 29.31 .00 .00
000232 AMERICAN IRON & SUPPLY COMPANY, INC 1 438.40 438.40 .00 .00
000272 SNELL, DAVID B. 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 .00 .00
000305 BALLOON SHOP, THE 1 422.26 422.26 .00 .00
00 8 HRUNN CONSTRUCTION, INC. 2 2,000.00 2,000.00 .00 .00
I BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 3 355.73 355.73 .00 .00
000833 BROCK WHITE, INC. 1 36.12 36.12 .00 .00
000843 HAGER, DALE 1 438.80 438.80 .00 .00
000861 BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SERVICE 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
000882 CORNERSTONE HOME BUILDER 2 974.89 974.89 .00 .00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 3 145.08 145.08 .00 .00
001014 T/C BUILDERS, INC: 3 1,358.61 1,358.61 .00 .00
001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 3,594.06 3,594.06 .00 .00
001115 CHICILO HOMES, INC. 1 477.75 477.75 .00 .00
001187 .CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 3,054.00 3,054.00 .00 .00
001280 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 329.01 329.01 .00 .0D
001293 DARE AMERICA MERCHANDISE, INC. 1 416.90 416.90 .00 .00
Date: 05/27/2004 Time: 09:26:55 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount
r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 443.88 443.88 .00 .00
001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 2 6,764.89 6,764.89 .00 .00
001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 292.25 292.25 .00 .00
001581 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA, INC. 1 1,078.50 1,078.50 .00 .00
001600 GALL'S INC. 1 9.52 9.52 .00 .00
001680 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC. 1 772.80 772.80 .00 .00
001752 MOONEN, PATRICK 1 18.09 18.09 .00 .00
001768 H & L MESABI, INC. 1 132.06 132.06 .00 .00
001940 K.E.E.P.R.S., INC. 1 84.29 84.29 .00 .00
001981 INTEGRA HOMES, INC. 1 475.86 475.86 .00 .00
002009 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00
002036 J- CRAFT, INC. 1 4,218.47 4,218.47 .00 .00
002053 J. R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL, INC. 1 1,230.00 1,230.00 .00 .00
002245 LANG BUILDERS, INC. 2 898.59 898.59 .00 .00
ilkLEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 13.06 13.06 .00 .00
002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 253.34 253.34 .00 .D0
002516 TEE'S PLUS (EDH,INC.) 1 757.37 757.37 .00 .00
002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 279.08 279.08 .00 .00
003070 -MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. l 53.69 53.69 .00 .00
003092 NATIONAL ALLIANCE 1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00
003271 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 2 137.32 137.32 .00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 33.25 33.25 .00 .00
003639 QUALITY CHECKED CONSTRUCTION 3 2,457.93 2,457.93 .00 .00
- 003789 RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 127.00 127.00 .00 .00
003880 SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 2 6,355.49 6,355.49 .00 .00
003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 2 373.94 373.94 .00 .00
Date: 05/27/2004 Time: 09:26:56 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
•
Name
Operator: JAL Page: 3
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 669.95 669.95 .00 .00
004244 MINNESOTA EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION -- 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00
004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 1 62.31 62.31 .00 .00
004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 178.81 178.81 .00 .00
004413 MOESCHTER, ROBERTA 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00
004788 SPRINT 1 62.46 62.46 .00 .00
005024 CHRISTIANCE, GREGORY E AND 1 6,375.00 6,375.00 .00 .00
005032 CENTRAL WOOD PRODUCTS 1 1,104.94 1,104.94 .00 .00
005033 JOHNSON HOMES, INC. 1 480.10 480.10 .00 .00
005034 EARTHWORKS TECHNOLOGIES 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00
005035 MILLER, ROSE ANN P. 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 .00 .00
005036 MASONICK, LOUIS R. III AND TARA J. 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00
005037 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF 1 39.00 39.00 .00 .00
005038 PRE -DAWN CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 453.41 453.41 .00 .00
00 0 ROTHENBACHER, MARGO 1 68.00 68.00 .00 .00
f SCHREIBER MULLANEY CONSTRUCTION 1 5,500.00 5,500.00 .00 .00
005237 TRUDEAU, WILLIAM P. AND SANDRA M. 1 6,625.00 6,625.00 .00 .00
006109 UNITED ELECTRIC 2 898.98 898.98 .00 .00
900058 HANSON BUILDERS, INC. 4 2,939.45 2,939.45 .00 .00
900066 AVALON HOMES, INC. 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00
900076 PROCRAFT HOMES, INC. 1 466.37 466.37 .00 .00
900145 MORNING SUN HOMES, INC. 4 1,979.52 1,979.52 .00 .00
900224 NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS 1 477.19 477.19 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 95 114,564.93 114,564.93 .00 .00*
Date: 06/04/2004 Time: 09:54:15 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 3985 - 3985
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor# Name # of items Net . Gross Discount Lost
000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 1 9.59 9.59 .00 .00
000027 BERTRAM, LORI 1 22.00 22.00 .00 .00
000028 LAPLANTE, KRISTI 1 46.00 46.00. .00 .00
000029 MOORE, TRISH 1 22.00 22.00 .00 .00
000031 NATIONAL ASSOC OF SCHOOL , 1 425.00 425.00 .00 .00
000049 STRANGELAND, ANGIE 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00
000068 SERRA, MARGARET 1 80.00 00.00 .00 .00
000080 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 8 557.53 557.53 .00 .00
000086 WURTH USA, INC. 1 .49.20 49.20 .00 .00
0 7 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, INC. 1 120.15 120.15 .00 .00
0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 1 2,539.70 2,539.70 .00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 2 103.58 103.58 .00 .00
000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 2 404.18 404.18 .00 .00
000350 ANOKA COUNTY 1 49.36 49.36 .00 .00
000356 RICK BOSCHEE HOMES, INC. 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00
000370 CENTRAL COMMUINICATIONS 2 11.14 11.14 .00 .00
000390 ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY 1 330.61 330.61 .00 .00
000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #14 1 622.97 622.97 .00 .00
000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,245.63 1,245.63 .D0 .00
000525 RAMSEY COUNTY 1' 30.00 30.00 .00 .00
000539 TARGET 1 91.20 91:20 .00 .00
000680 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC. 1 29.02 29.02 .00 .00
Date: 06/04/2004 Time: 09:54:16 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount
Vex._ _ # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 3 165.86 165.86 .00 .00
000879 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH PLAN 1 33,136.70 33,136.70 .00 .00
000980 UNITED RENTALS, INC. 1 128.51 128.51 .00 .00
001000 CATCO PARTS, INC. 1 29.46 29.46 .00 .00
001046 F.M. FRATTALONE EXC /GRADING, INC. 1 60,136.09 60,136.09 .00 .00
001048 HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC. 1 237.50 237.50 .00 .00
001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 2 2,150.00 2,150.00 :00 .00
001053 CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL ALIGN, INC. 1 80.00 80.00 .00 .00
001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 455.14 455.14 .00 .00
001223 CROSS NURSERIES, INC. 1 1,313.67 1,313.67 .00 .00
001270 DALCO, INC. 3 3,706.97 3,706.97 .00 .00
001280 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 83.22 83.22 .00 .00
001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 2 8,032.44 8,032.44 .00 .00
001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 3,565.25 3,565.25 .00 .00
1, 0 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 133.75 133.75 .00 .00
0_ _ _. FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 2 405.15 405.15 .00 ,00
001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 845.35 845.35 .00 .00
001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 8.54 8.54 .00 .00
001605 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC 1 165.00 165.00 .00 .00
001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 103.18 103.18 .00 .00
001630 GOA COMPANY, INC. 2 906.26 906.26 .00 .00
001700 GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVICE 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00
001859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 11.94 11.94 .00 .00
001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 8.56 8.56 .00 .00
001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 330.00 330.00 .00 .00
001982 US LINK /TDS METROCOM 1 1,724.20 1,724.20 .00 .00
002009 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00
Date: 06/04/2004 Time: 09:54:17 City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 3
• FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Discount
V,. r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 777.00 777.00 .00 .00
002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 131.90 _ 131.90 .00 .00
002521 BRENDA S. SHALD & ASSOCIATES 1 929.06 929.06 .00 .00
002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 583.46 583.46 .00 .00
002613 MIDWEST LANDSCAPES, INC. 1 14,749.00 14,749.00 .00 .00
002694 SBC, INC. 1 27.54 27.54 .00 .00
002839 MINNESOTA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION 1 129.00 129.00 .00 .00
003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 655.80 655.80 .00 .00
003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 2 99.60 99.60 .00 .00
003370 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. 1 5,803.57 5,803.57 .00 .00
003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 48.94 48.94 .00 .00
003492 PETTY CASH 1 220.69 220.69 .00 .00
003524 PITNEY BOWES, INC. 1 247.78 247.78 .00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 2 156.28 156.28 .00 .00
11111 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 99.90 99.90 .00 .00
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 84.40 84.40 .00 .00
003928 PROFESSIONAL TURF & RENOVATION 4 1,704.00 1,704.00 .00 .00
004070 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 3 527.16 527.16 .00 .00
004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 1,594.77 1,594.77 .00 .00
004142 STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO, INC. 1 220.00 220.00 .00 .00
004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 2 310.10 310.10 .00 .00
004191 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00
004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 16,960.26 16,960.26 .00 .00
004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAP. CHEVROLET, INC. 1 111.11 111.11 .00 .00
004420 HEITKE, GORDON -1 227.49 227.49 .00 .00
004510 TRUCK UTILITIES, INC. 1 615.57 615.57 .00 .00
004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 1 1,513.44 1,513.44 .00 .00
Date: 06/04/2004 Time: 09:54:18 City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 4
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
V4 n Name # of items Net Discount
Gross Discount Lost
004709 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. 1 106.00 106.00 .00 .00
004713 MANSETTI'S PIZZA & PASTA, INC. 1 66.00 66.00 .00 .00
004730 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC. 2 109.39 109.39 .00 .00
004762 NEU & COMPANY, INC. 1 3,865.85 3,865.85 .00 .00
007109 BLAKE BUILDERS, INC. 1 424.23 424.23 .00 .00
900217 ARNT CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 323,431.78 323,431.78 .00 .00
900415 CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRUCTION 1 9,100.00 9,100.00. .00 .00
Grand Totals: 109 512,382.67 512,382.67 .00 .00*
Date: 06/04/2004 Time: 10:01:11 Operator: JAL
•
Ranges:
Options:
Page: 1
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Fund:
Dept Id:
Program:
Vendor #:
Invoice #:
Schedule Journal #:
Bank #:
Cash #:
Payroll Check Dates:
Print:
Report Format:
# of copies:
Total By Account:
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(R)
(A)
(A)
(A)
D
1
1
Y
3968 - 3991
Sort: D
Print Ranges /Options: Y
Process Payroll: N
Page on Sort: N
Description
Dept
Amount
0 AFSCME COUNCIL #14
71064 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A
71085 AVALON HOMES, INC.
0 BERTRAM, LORI
0 BLAKE BUILDERS, INC.
71088 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC.
71090 BRUNN CONSTRUCTION, IN
71093 CHICILO HOMES, INC.
71096 CONNEXUS ENERGY
71097 CORNERSTONE HOME BUILD
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF.M
1110 EARTHWORKS TECHNOLOGIE
67 HANSON BUILDERS, INC.
05 HANSON BUILDERS, INC.
-- -.109 INTEGRA HOMES, INC.
71069 INTL UNION OF OPER ENG
71112 JOHNSON HOMES, INC.
71071 .KEY LAND HOMES
71114 LANG BUILDERS, INC.
0 LAPLANTE, KRISTI
0 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR
0 MIDWEST LANDSCAPES, IN
71073 'MN NCPERS LIFE INSURAN
71121 MOESCHTER, ROBERTA
0 MOORE, TRISH
71123 MORNING SUN HOMES, INC
71127 NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS
0 PETTY CASH
71131 PRE -DAWN CONSTRUCTION,
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN
71133 PROCRAFT HOMES, INC.
71134 QUALITY CHECKED CONSTR
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
0 RICK BOSCHEE HOMES, IN
71136 ROTHENBACHER, MARGO •
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /366 WA
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /2235 F
TOW /'01 DODGE DURANGO
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /374 SI
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /369 5I
OUTDOOR LIGHTING /CENTURY
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6471 C
DENTAL INSURANCE
REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6494 S
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6389 H
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6545 L
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6557 S
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /563 AR
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /511 SO
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
TREES
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
P.EIMB BLDG ESCROW /109 PA
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /726 CO
SUPPLIES /STAMPS
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6628 C
MEDICAL INSURANCE
ADVERTISING
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6401 L
REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6569 L
LIFE INSURANCE
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1226P
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
•
* * * * * * ** 622.97
* * * * * * ** 176.20
* * * * * * ** 1,500.00
* * * * * * ** 22.00
* * * * * * ** 424.23
* * * * * * ** 225.73
* * * * * * ** 2,000.00
******** 477.75
* * * * * * ** 3,054.00
* * * * * * ** 974.89
* * * * * * ** 2,150.62
* * * * * * ** 150.00
* * * * * * ** 500.00
* * * * * * ** 2,939.45
* * * * * * ** 475.86
* * * * * * ** 420.00
* * * * * * ** 480.10
* * * * * * ** 1,500.00
* * * * * * ** 898.59
* * * * * * ** 46.00
* * * * * * ** 777.00
* * * * * * ** 12,050.00
* * * * * * ** 416.00
* * * * * * ** 40.00
* * * * * * ** 22.00
* * * * * * ** 1,979.52
* * * * * * ** 477.19
* * * * * * ** 5.00
* * * * * * ** 453.41
* * * * * * ** 8,220.04
* * * * * * ** 23.28
* * * * * * ** 466.37
* * * * * * ** 2,457.93
* * * * * * ** 912.42
* * * * * * ** 1,500.00
* * * * * * ** 68.00
-13-
Date: 06/04/2004 Tin*:. 10:01:11 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 2
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept
Amount
71138 SCHREIBER MULLANEY CON REIMS BLDG ESCROW /124 AS * * * * * * **
0 SERRA, MARGARET REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
71139 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE /APR_, * * * * * * **
71075 SISKA GROUP, INC. REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2315 T * * * * * * **
0 STRANGELAND, ANGIE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
71145 T/C BUILDERS, INC. 'REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6527 L * * * * * * **
Total for Dept **
0 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS • PROGRAM REC ADULT SP 2,075.00
Total for Dept 202 2,075.00*
0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. T- SHIRTS SPECIAL 1,846.60
Total for Dept 205 1,846.60*
5,500.00
80.00
1,175.08
500.00
30.00
1,358.61
57,550.24*
71065 ANDOVER AREA LACROSSE INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
0 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS BROKEN EXIT LIGHT
71125 NATIONAL ALLIANCE MANUAL
0 VARSITY PHOTOS, INC. PHOTOS
Total for Dept 207
0 MANSETTI'S PIZZA &
0 NEU & COMPANY, INC.
0 NYSTROM PUBLISHING
0 TARGET
•6
0
0
0
71070
71115
71074
0
0
71141
PAS.GRAND OPENING LUNCH
LEADERSHIP WORKSHOP
COM SUMMER NEWSLETTER
SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 401
CAMBRIDGE TRUE VALUE
DELTA DENTAL, PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
GOVERNMENT TRAIN SERVI
HEITKE, GORDON
KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
SPRINT
ADAPTER /ANTENNA /HEADSET
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
REGISTRATION /GORDON H
REIMBURSE MEETING /CONFER
SEMINAR / GORDON H
SEMINAR /PAULA, DAN, AL,
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
MEDICAL INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
Total for Dept 402
0 FORTIS. BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
71074 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE. INSURANCE
Total for Dept 406.
0
0
71108
71072
71115
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFF
IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
MEMBERSHIP /AL R
PRINTING SERVICE
REGISTRATION /AL R
SEMINAR /PAULA, DAN, AL,
YOUTH IN 556.00
YOUTH IN 75.00
YOUTH IN 15.00
YOUTH IN 106.00
752.00*
MAYOR /CO 66.00
MAYOR /CO 3,865.85
MAYOR /CO 3,092.08
MAYOR /CO 56.86
7,080.79*
ADMINIST 77.70
ADMINIST 140.27
ADMINIST 74.19
ADMINIST 10.00
ADMINIST 227.49
ADMINIST 50.00
ADMINIST 10.00
ADMINIST 19.91
ADMINIST 2,024.92
ADMINIST 23.75
ADMINIST 62.46
2,720.69*
SENIORS 4.72
SENIORS 50.03
SENIORS 4.75
59.50*
FINANCE 98.20
INS FINANCE 48.21
FINANCE 165.00
FINANCE 91:24
FINANCE 20.00
FINANCE 40.00
-14-
Date: 06/04/2004 Time: 10:01:11
•
Operator: JAL
Page:
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept
Amount
0 MINNESOTA TAXPAYERS AS MEMBERSHIP /AL R
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE
0 RAMSEY COUNTY DEBT SCHEDULE
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
Total for Dept 407
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ECONOMIC
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ECONOMIC
Total for Dept 415
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
Total for Dept 416
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
71074 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
Total for Dept
Illiii°
6
8
J91
0
71098
0
0
0
71102
71104
71108
71113
71118
0
71126
0
0
0
0
0
71143
71076
71146
0
INS
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
MEDICAL INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
A T & T WIRELESS
BALLOON SHOP, THE
BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC.
C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
CENTRAL COMMUINICATION
DARE AMERICA MERCHANDI
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
BENEFITS, INC.
INC.
DALE
418
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY
BALLOON ARCHS /DARE GRADU
TOW /FORD F -150
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PLANNING
PLANNING
PLANNING
PLANNING
Communit
Communit
Communit
Communit
Communit
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
MODEM /JUNE POLICE
CHAIRS /BOTTLES /SUNGLASSE POLICE
DENTAL INSURANCE POLICE
MARINE BATTERY POLICE
FORTIS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS POLICE
GALL'S UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE
HAGER, REIMBURSE TUITION
IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING SERVICE
KEEPERS, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES
METRO SALES INCORPORAT COPIER MAINTENANCE
NATIONAL ASSOC OF SCHO TRAINING /JIM C
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY
PETTY CASH SUPPLIES /STAMPS
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
SHRED -IT, INC.
STAR TRIBUNE, INC.
STREICHER'S, INC.
TARGET
TEE'S PLUS (EDH,INC.)
US LINK /TDS METROCOM
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT POLICE
ADVERTISING POLICE
VEST POLICE
POLAROID FILM POLICE
PINS /CERTIFICATES /SHIRTS POLICE
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY POLICE
129.00
946.18
30.00
14.97
1,582.80*
28.05
13.48
352.18
4.75
398.46*
28.05
14.78
352.18
4.75
399.76*
56.12
28.09
19.91
660.28
9.50
773.90*
49.00
422.26
130.00
47.81
11.14
416.90
364.56
58.56
326.52
9.52
438.80
162.10
84.29
279.08
425.00
443.88
215.69
11,259.20
128.25
99.90
282.15
669.95
106.45
757.37
559.30
Date: 06 /04/2004 Time: 10:01:11 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 4
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept
Amount
71078 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL POLICE
Total for Dept 420 .
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FIRE
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FIRE
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE FIRE
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FIRE
Total for Dept 421
0
71079
0
0
71122
0
0
71082
0
71089
0
0
0
71074
• 0
5
0
0
71144
0
0
71078
0
71081
0
71083
71087
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,000 LAKES CHAPTER
10,0001:AKES CHAPTER
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
MOONEN, PATRICK
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
REGISTRATION /PATRICK M BUILDING
REGISTRATION /PETE K BUILDING
DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS BUILDING
REIMBURSE CALL PHONE CAS BUILDING
MEDICAL INSURANCE BUILDING
LIFE INSURANCE BUILDING
Total for Dept 422
AID ELECTRIC SERVICE,
ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY
BROCK WHITE, INC.
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPAN
SBC, INC.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS
T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
US LINK /TDS METROCOM
XCEL ENERGY
INSTALL /REPAIR LIGHT
SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
SQUEEGEE
DENTAL INSURANCE
STREET SIGNS
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
MEDICAL INSURANCE •
LIFE INSURANCE
STREET LIGHT REPAIR
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY
CITY MEMBERSHIP
ASPHALT
ASPHALT
POINT SHOVEL RENTAL
MONTHLY SERVICE /MP-Y
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
Total for Dept 430
ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER,
ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER,
AMERICAN FASTENER & SU
AMERICAN FASTENER & SU
BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SER
BOYER TRUCKS, INC.
CATCO PARTS, INC.
CENTER FRAME AND WHEEL
DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC.
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE T
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.
HOSE /FERRULE
SUPPLIES
WHEEL
PARTS /SUPPLIES
ALIGN #248
IND ASSEMBLY
PLUG /LITE
FRONT END ALIGN
GASOHOL
DENTAL INSURANCE
PROJECTION LAMP
ROTOR
RADIATOR
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
-16
20.69
17,768.37*
82.20
37.51
1,802.06
14.25
1,936.02*
60.00
60.00
112.21
49.29
18.09
2,266.74
16.62
2,582.95*
292.82
330.61
36.12
112.21
133.75
63.67
50.03
1,355.89
27.79
127.00
13.77
500.00
63.26
62.31
128.51
111.38
3,276.54
6,685.66*
369.75
55.28
77.75
41.54
50.00
165.86
29.46
80.00
8,032.44
28.05
8.54
41.04
405.15
Date: 06/04/2004 Time: 10:01:11 Operator: JAL
Check #
71101
0
0
0
71103
0
71110
71116
71128
0
0
71137
0
0
0
71147
0
71150
0
71082
0
0
0
X091
5
0
0
71074
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
71092
71095
0
0
0
71068
0
0
Page: 5
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept
Amount
FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I
GOA COMPANY, INC.
H & L MESABI, INC.
HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC.
J- CRAFT, INC.
LEEF BROTHER, INC.
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPM
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT,
STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO,
THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH
THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH
VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENT
WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH,
WURTH USA, INC.'
PARTS /SUPPLIES
LONG TERM DISABILITY
CHEMICALS
REISSUE LOST CHECK
SNOW PLOW BLADE
WINDSHIELD
PLOW
SHOP TOWELS
PIN W /CLIP
MEDICAL INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
PARTS CLEANER
MILL HEAD
BRAKE CHECK
PARTS /SUPPLIES
PARTS /SUPPLIES
APRON
LOCK DEICER /KEYS
ICE SPRAY
Total for Dept 431
AID ELECTRIC SERVICE,
ANOKA COUNTY
BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS, I
BRENDA S. SHALD & ASSO
C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
DALCO, INC.
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
OFFICEMAX, INC.
PITNEY BOWES, INC.
FLEET
INS FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
POWER FACTOR CORRECTION
MAPS
KEYS
TELECOM EXPENSE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY
BAGS /FILTERS
LONG TERM DISABILITY
PRINTING
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POSTAGE METER RENTAL
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
STAR TRIBUNE, INC. SUBSCRIPTION
US LINK /TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY
WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 432
A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO,
ALL SEASONS RENTAL, IN
CENTRAL WOOD PRODUCTS
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
CROSS NURSERIES, INC.•
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
HOFFMAN, MICHAEL
HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA
MENARDS, INC.
SOD
READY MIX SAND
MULCH /BRICK
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY
TREES
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
REMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWA
BUMPER
SINKER /SHIMS /DOOR
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
INS GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
292.25
12.89
103.18
906.26
132.06
237.50
4,218.47
13.06
137.32
646.83
5.46
290.79
1,594.77
220.00
111.11
178.81
39.90
29.31
49.20
18,604.03*
779.21
49.36
29.02
929.06
97.27
3,413.43
3,706.97
7.38
131.90
161.01
48.94
247.78
495.20
4.75
27.95
780.99
404.18
11,314.40*
9.59
120.15
1,104.94
180.63
592.39
154.31
64.24
96.62
8.56
545.38
Date: 06/04/2004 Time: 10:01:12 Operator: JAL
•
Pace: 6
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
71124
0
71074
0
0
0
71077
0
71078
0
0
0
71074
0
0
0
71142
0
Description
MTI DISTIBUTING, INC.
NATURE CALLS, INC.
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
PROFESSIONAL TURF & RE
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
URICH, TRACEY
US LINK /TDS METROCOM
XCEL ENERGY
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PORTABLE RESTROOMS
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
MEDICAL INSURANCE
SUPPLIES
LIFE INSURANCE
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL
Total for Dept 450
ALL STAR SPORTS, INC.
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY 0
TARGET
Dept
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
Amount
T- SHIRTS RECREATI
DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RECREATI
MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL RECREATI
SUMMER NEWSLETTER RECREATI
MEDICAL INSURANCE RECREATI
LIFE INSURANCE RECREATI
JUDO CLASS RECREATI
SUPPLIES RECREATI
Total for Dept 451
0 CROSS NURSERIES, INC. TREES
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
71120 MINNESOTA EROSION CONT WORKSHOP /MARTY A
•0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE
Total for Dept 461
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
INS ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
71084 AMERICAN IRON & SUPPLY RECYCLING DAY SOLID WA
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SOLID WA
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SOLID WA
O HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV GLOVES SOLID WA
71111 J. R.'S APPLIANCE DISP RECYCLING DAY SOLID WA
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE SOLID WA
0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SOLID WA
.0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL SOLID WA
71137 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL SOLID WA
Total for Dept 462
0 CROSS NURSERIES, INC.
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
0 MIDWEST LANDSCAPES, IN
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN
TREES
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
TREES
MEDICAL INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
Total for. Dept 463
0 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, TUBING /FERRULE
'FORESTRY
FORESTRY
INS FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
WATER
-18-
53.69
655.80
101.13
155.28
1,704.00
26.13
79.95
138.43
83.62
5,874.84*
693.10
61.72
37.28
102.51
2,711.49
470.98
15.20
39.00
34.34
4,165.62*
146.97
9.25
4.91
20.00
196.02
1.58
378.73*
438.40
9.54
5.06
11.94
1,230.00
201.96
1.59
84.40
83.15
2,066.04*
574.31
9.26
4.91
2,699.00
196.02
1.58
3,485.08*
187.78
Date: 06/04/2004 Time: 10:01:12 Operator: JAL
• City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Page: 7
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
71151 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE WATER 227.57
O DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT GASKET /PAINT WATER 83.22
71099 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT GASKET /RING /SUPPORT /NUT/ WATER 329.01
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE WATER 74.35
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS WATER 24.11
71106 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN ACID WATER 6,764.89
0 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I WATER METER PARTS WATER 1,513.44
71074 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL WATER 51.54
71129 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL WATER 386.40
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE WATER 943.46
71132 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING WATER 33.25
O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE WATER 16.17
O SBC, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY WATER 9.18
O TRUCK UTILITIES, INC. SADDLE BOX WATER 615.57
71149 UNITED ELECTRIC CALL -OUT WATER 898.98
O US LINK /TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY WATER 134.10
71076 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL WATER 1,305.92
Total for Dept 494 13,598.94*
O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU PARTS /SUPPLIES SEWER 25.83
71151 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE SEWER 227.57
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SEWER 46.28
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SEWER 24.11
O INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES TELEVISE LINE SEWER 330.00
71129 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL SEWER 386.40
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT MEDICAL INSURANCE SEWER 591.28
111/1 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SEWER 11.37
0 SBC, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY SEWER 4.59
_ —_,78 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL SEWER 558.01
Total for Dept 495 2,205.44*
0 ARNT CONSTRUCTION, INC CONTRACTOR /62ND STREET OTHER 323,431.78
71094 CHRISTIANCE, GREGORY E WARRANTY DEED, EASEMENT, OTHER 6,375.00
O CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRU CONCRETE WORK OTHER 9,100.00
O F.M. FRATTALONE EXC /GR CONTRACTOR /ELM STREET OTHER 60,136.09
71107 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA, IN CONTRACTOR /HIGHLAND MEAD OTHER 1,078.50
71117 MASONICK, LOUIS R. III EASEMENT AND DAMAGES OTHER 5,000.00
0 MENARDS, INC. BAGS /FENCE OTHER 38.08
71119 MILLER, ROSE ANN P. EASEMENT AND DAMAGES OTHER 15,000.00
71130 POSER, STEVEN G. AND G EASEMENT AND DAMAGES OTHER 6,750.00
O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING OTHER 133.00
O REED BUSINESS INFORMAT ADVERTISING • OTHER 527.16
71139 SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICK LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE /APR OTHER 5,180.41
71140 SNELL, DAVID B. EASEMENT AND DAMAGES OTHER 15,000.00
O T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS INSTALL BLACKTOP OTHER 16,897.00
71148 TRUDEAU, WILLIAM P. AN EASEMENT AND DAMAGES OTHER 6,625.00
O VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENT RESPIRATOR /FILTER OTHER 69.49
Total for Dept 499 471,341.51*
Grand Total 637,247.37*
•
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
6/7/2004
The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval:
DATE CHECK# NAME
6/4/2004 14271
6/4/2004 14272
6/4/2004 14273
6/4/2004 14274
6/4/2004 14275
6/4/2004 14276
6/4/2004 14277
6/4/2004 14278
6/4/2004 14279
6/4/2004 14280
6/4/2004 14281
6/4/2004 14282
6/4/2004 14283
6/4/2004 14284
6/4/2004 14285
6/4/2004 14286
6/4/2004 14287
6/4/2004 14288
6/4/2004 14289
6/4/2004 14290
6/4/2004 14291
6/4/2004 14292
6/4/2004 14293
6/4/2004 14294
6/4/2004 14295
6/4/2004 14296
6/4/2004 14297
6/4/2004 14298
6/4/2004 14299
6/4/2004 14300
6/4/2004 14301
6/4/2004 14302
6/4/2004 14303
6/4/2004 14304
6/4/2004 14305
6/4/2004 14306
6/4/2004 14307
6/4/2004 14308
6/4/2004 14309
6/4/2004 14310
6/4/2004 14311
6/4/2004 14312
6/4/2004 14313
6/4/2004 14314
6/4/2004 14315
Anoka - Technical College
Arthur Mohler
Aspen Mills
Best Buy
Bob Stafki
Brad Racutt
Bradley Stephens
Centennial Utilities
CenterPoint Energy
Citgo Petroleum Corporation
Connexus Energy
David Bruder
Discount Tire Company
Emergency Apparatus Maintenance
Emergency Medical Products, Inc.
Fire Instruction & Rescue Education, Inc.
Glen Olson
Jeff Amacher
Kathy Mischke
Laura Louis
McLeod USA
Metro Fire
Metrocall
Mike Ryan
Mike T. Peterson
Milo Bennett
MN Chapter IAAI / Jeffrey G. Schadegg
MN Fire Service Certification Board
Red Rooster Auto Stores
Ron Flatten
Scott T. Mischke
Steve Mach
Target
Thierry Chevallier
Todd Gardner
USI, Inc.
Verizon Wireless
Viking Office Products
Bob Stafki
Brad Racutt
Bradley Stephens
Forest Lake Ford
Grafix Shoppe
Northern Safety Technology, Inc.
Superior Ford, Inc.
ACCOUNT
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42120 - Uniform Expense
42180 - Office Supplies
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42251 - Station 1 - Gas
42253 - Station 2 - Gas
42100 - Fuel and Lube
42252 - Station 1 - Electric
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance
42260 - Medical Supplies
42280 - Training Expense
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42180 - Office Supplies
42240 - Telephone
42130 - Equipment Expense
42240 - Telephone
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance
42200 - Dues and Memberships
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42180 - Office Supplies
42220 - Travel, Conference, School
42130 - Equipment Expense
42180 - Office Supplies
42240 - Telephone
42180 - Office Supplies
11100 - Fixed Asset - Equipment
11100 - Fixed Asset - Equipment
11100 - Fixed Asset - Equipment
11100 - Fixed Asset - Equipment
11100 - Fixed Asset - Equipment
11100 - Fixed Asset - Equipment
11100 - Fixed Asset - Equipment
AMOUNT
145.12
88.00
93.00
362.07
216.00
440.00
172.00
139.59
216.56
138.03
279.10
88.00
460.70
1,786.81
85.50
5,820.00
344.00
636.00
64.00
16.34
358.83
1,645.00
81.64
48.00
424.00
13.50
25.00
25.00
14.48
48.00
112.00
200.00
15.04
88.00
131.58
66.74
145.97
120.69
250.00
1,653.00
100.00
369.00
1,150.00
1,902.30
21,714.00
$42,292.59
•
STAFF ORIGNINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND:
AGENDA ITEM 1B
Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk
June 14, 2004
Consider Resolution 04 -85, Approving
Application for Temporary 3.2 Percent Malt
Liquor (Beer) License, a Cabaret License and an
Exemption for Gambling Permit for the Annual
St. Joseph Catholic Church August Festival.
Simple Majority (3/5 Vote)
St. Joseph Catholic Church is hosting its annual August Festival on Saturday, August 7
and Sunday, August 8, 2004. As part of the celebration, food and beverages, including
beer, will be served. The Lino Lakes City Code, 702.02, Subd. 3, states "temporary on-
sale licenses shall be granted only to bona fide clubs and charitable, religious and non-
profit organizations for the sale of beer for consumption on the premises only ".
In addition, the parish has made application to acquire a cabaret license and approval for
an exemption for lawful gambling permit. A dance will be held Saturday, August 7, from
5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Sunday, August 8, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Non - profit
organizations are allowed, under State Gambling Statutes, to apply for an exemption
permit if they conduct fewer than five (5) gambling occasions per year. St. Joseph
Catholic Church conducts fewer than five.
St. Joseph's has completed the necessary applications, submitted a current certificate of
insurance and paid the proper fees. The applications and the certificate of insurance are
on file in the city clerk's office.
The police department is conducting a background investigation and approval is
contingent upon a finding of no information that would require a recommendation of
denial.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -85
2. Deny Approval of Resolution No. 04 -85
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -85
•
•
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -85
RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR A 3.2 PERCENT MALT
LIQUOR (BEER) LICENSE, CABARET LICENSE AND AN EXEMPTION FOR
GAMBLING PERMIT FOR THE ANNUAL ST. JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH
AUGUST FESTIVAL
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
the Lino Lakes City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting of
June 14, 2004; and
St. Joseph Catholic Church has made application for a 3.2 percent malt
liquor (beer) license, a cabaret license and an exemption for lawful
gambling permit for their annual August Festival to be held on August 7th
and 8th, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes Police Department has conducted an investigation
of St. Joseph Catholic Church; and
WHEREAS, St. Joseph Catholic Church is in compliance with city ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino
Lakes hereby approves the 3.2 percent malt liquor (beer) license, the cabaret license and
the application for exemption for gambling permit for the August festival, pending
completion of background check.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of June, 2004.
ATTEST:
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF MEMBER Gordon Heitke, City Administrator
DATE June 14, 2004
SUBJECT 2004 -2005 City Council Goals and Management Action
Plans
VOTE REQUIRED 3/5
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the procedures set forth in the SUMMARY OF KEY
OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS, MAY 22, 2004 GOALS SETTING
SESSION, the City Staff has prepared specific Management Action Plans (MAPs) for
pursuing implementation of council's seven High - Priority 2004 -2005 Goals, identified at
the goal setting workshop on May 22, 2004. The MAPs identify specific performance
objectives, schedules, methodologies, and action plans. They also identify operating and
capital budget requirements. These MAPs are being presented to the council for review,
discussion, and comprehension of how the administration intends to proceed in fulfilling
its role in executing the council's policy direction.
Council should review and adopt by resolution the seven High - Priority Goals and
Management Action Plans, identified at the goal- setting workshop on May 22, as an
official statement of its leadership priorities.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the 2004 -2005 City Council Goals and Management Action Plans
2. Refer back to Staff
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the 2004 -2005 City Council Goals and Management Action Plans
• GOALS AND MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN
2004 - 2005
1. Complete Town Center and YCMA. (Council Members — 4; Staff
Members — 4)
a. Calendar Year 2004:
(1) Objective: Complete predevelopment phase
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Finalize City/YMCA Development Agreement
• Finalize funding sources for city share of YMCA construction
and improvements
• Complete sale of city land to Hartford
• Finalize EDA/Hartford Development Agreement by August
• Finalize operations and maintenance agreement for Woods
Edge
• Approve Final Plat
• Order public improvements by October
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: City Staff
Key Contributors: Springsted, Inc.
Kennedy & Graven
SEH
Hartford Group
YMCA
City Council /EDA
(4) Budget Guidelines: Costs of Woods Edge predevelopment phase
borne by developer. City costs associated with YMCA are outside
of annual budget.
b. Calendar Year 2005:
(1) Objective: Enter development phase
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Begin construction of public improvements, including Lake
Drive
• Approve Phase 1 development of Woods Edge, begin
construction
- 2 4 -
1
• • Approve YMCA site and building plans, begin construction
• Market Woods Edge
•
•
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: City Staff
Key Contributors: SEH
YMCA
Hartford Group
City Council
(4) Budget Guidelines: Additional marketing dollars may be needed.
Note: Council indicated a preference that staff should pursue some
non-franchise businesses to be included in the Town Center
development.
2. Complete Visioning Process for the Benchmark Site on 35E and
begin Master Planning for the balance of 35E Corridor. (Council
Members — 3; Staff Members — 5)
a. Calendar Year 2004:
(1) Objective: Initiate a citizen -driven master plan process for the
Benchmark site and begin review of 35E Corridor
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Develop action plan for the visioning process
• Identify key constituents and involve citizens in visioning
process
• Visit precedent communities
• Conduct market research
• Begin AUAR
• Communicate progress to the citizens
• Explore funding sources for expanded AUAR
• Explore funding sources for 35E bridge reconstruction
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: Benchmark Community Builder
Collaborative
Key Contributors: City Staff
Citizens and key stakeholders
- 2 5 -
2
s
(4) Budget Guidelines: Currently pursuing a Met Council Grant,
without the grant city may need to budget for 35E Corridor AUAR
for 2005
b. Calendar Year 2005:
(1) Objective: Complete Master Plan and begin predevelopment phase
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Complete AUAR of 35E corridor
• Complete Master Plan of Benchmark Site
• City development approvals
• Develop a marketing plan
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: Benchmark Community Builder
Collaborative
Key Contributors: City Staff
Citizens
City Council
Advisory Boards
(4) Budget Guidelines: Potential need to budget for AUAR for 35E
Condor
3. Review Comp Plan and adopt changes, if needed. (Council
Members — 3; Staff Members — 5)
a. Calendar Year 2004:
(1)
Objective: To evaluate the status and effectiveness of the City's
2001 Comprehensive Plan
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Prepare Review of Plan
• Identify possible modifications
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: Community Development Staff
Key Contributors: TKDA
Advisory Boards
City Council
(3)
- 2 6 -
3
• (4) Budget Guidelines: Primarily Staff Time, Some engineering
related expenses for Transportation and Utility reviews.
b. Calendar Year 2005:
(1) Objective: If necessary, Update Plan
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Select Consultant
• Develop Participatory Process
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: Consultant, Community Development Staff
Key Contributors: Staff
Consultant
Advisory Boards
City Council
(4) Budget Guidelines: City staff time. Consultant need and cost
dependent on Scope of Work
4. Resolve the Charter Road Reconstruction Limitation provision
with the City's Charter Commission. (Council Members — 3;
Staff Members — 4).
a. Calendar Year 2004:
(1)
Objective: Define a public improvement construction and
financing process that establishes a sound, fiscally responsible
method of maintaining the City's infrastructure while minimizing
impacts to Lino Lakes residents and businesses.
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Prepare Pavement Management Program
• Review and Approval by Council and Charter Commission
• Identify implementation issues and determine need for any
Charter modifications
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: City Staff
Key Contributors: TKDA
Springsted Inc.
City Council
Charter Commission
- 2 7 -
4
•
•
(4) Budget Guidelines: City staff time. Engineering included in 2004 .
General Engineering Budget. Will need to identify costs for
Springsted involvement
b. Calendar Year 2005:
(1) Objective:Implement Pavement Management Program
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Resolve any potential conflicts with Charter
• Prepare Phase I improvement projects
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: City staff
Key Contributors: City Council
Charter Commission
(4) Budget Guidelines: Dependent on scope of program.
5. Finish the trail system — construct what is identified in the City
Master Plan for Parks and Trails. (Council Members — 4; Staff
Members — 0).
a. Calendar Year 2004:
(1) Objective No. 1: Complete Birch Street Trail from Blackduck Drive to
Pheasant Hills Drive
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Obtain necessary approvals from Anoka County
• Plans and Specs — (Prepare, Distribute, Receive, and Award Bid)
• Supervise Construction Work
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: Rick DeGardner
Key Contributors: TKDA to prepare Plans and Specs
(4) Budget Guidelines: Approved 2004 Park Board Goal — Dedicated
Parks Fund
5
•
(1) Objective No. 2: Complete Trail Connections at Birch Park and
Sunrise Park.
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Plans and Specs — (Prepare, Distribute, Receive, and Award
Bid)
• Supervise Construction Work
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: Rick DeGardner
Key Contributors: TKDA to prepare Plans and Specs
(4) Budget Guidelines: Approved 2004 Park Board Goal — Dedicated
Parks Fund
b. Calendar Year 2005:
(1)
Objective: Continue Completing Trail System
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Prioritize Trail Development Projects
• Allocate Funds for Trail Development
• Identify Specific Trail Projects for 2005 Based On Available
Funds
• Prepare Plans and Specs, Send Out Bids, Receive Bids, Award
Bid
• Supervise Construction Work.
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: Rick DeGardner
Key Contributors: City Council
TKDA to prepare Plans and Specs
(4) Budget Guidelines: City Council Discretion, General Fund and/or
Dedicated Parks Fund.
6. Adopt a City image, which identifies and presents a positive
reflection of the community. (Council Members — 3; Staff
Members — 3).
a. Calendar Year 2004:
(1) Objective: Determine what Council wants to project as the city's
image, define the target audience and determine the purpose of the
message
- 2 9 -
6
•
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Develop an action plan once the objective becomes focused.
• Establish a long range plan and funding sources for
redeveloping blighted and substandard areas, with particular
emphasis on the entrances to the city.
• Address ways to provide enforcement of city zoning
ordinances regarding outside storage of vehicles and
equipment, and temporary signage
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: City Staff
Key Contributors: City Council
Advisory Boards
(4) Budget Guidelines: Provide for in Community Development
budget
b. Calendar Year 2005:
III(1) Objective: Implement Action Plan
•
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Establish and enhance gateways to the city
(3) Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: City Staff
Key Contributors: City Council
Advisory Boards
(4) Budget Guidelines: May have to budget additional dollars in
economic development budget
7. Pursue a diversified tax base for the Lino Lakes community.
(Council Members — 3; Staff Members — 5).
a. Calendar Year 2004:
(1)
Objective: Encourage balance of land uses, growth of existing
businesses and new development
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Implement 2004 EDAC Action Plan
- 3 0 -
7
(3)
Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: City Staff
Key Contributors: City Council
Advisory Boards
(3) Budget Guidelines: Dependent on individual project scope
b. Calendar Year 2005:
(1)
Objective: Encourage balance of land uses, growth of existing
businesses and new development
(2) Key Action Steps:
• Implement 2005 Action Plan
(3) Lead party and Key Contributors:
Lead party: City Staff
Key Contributors: City Council
Advisory Boards
• (4) Budget Guidelines: Dependent on individual project scope
- 3 1 -
8
•
AGENDA ITEM 3B
DATE: June 14, 2004
TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Ann Blair, City Clerk
RE: 2004 Liquor Compliance Checks and Violations
Attached find `Notice of Violation Hearing" letters issued to: Miller's on Main, the
American Legion, Oasis Market, and the VFW. The letters explain the purpose of
the public hearing and the process. In short, the Council will determine whether or
not these establishments violated Lino Lakes Ordinance 701 and what, if any, action
should be taken.
Police Chief Dave Pecchia reviewed this matter for the Council during the May 19,
2004 work session. Sergeant Bill Hammes will be at the public hearing and he will
give an overview of the Police Department's findings. J & K Liquors also received a
violation notice. Due to the sale of that store, the owner of J & K chose to waive the
hearing and has paid the recommended $500 fine.
Three of the establishments fall into the same category on the Best Practices Grid.
Therefore, if the Council determines individually that Miller's on Main, the
American Legion, or the VFW establishment violated the Lino Lakes City Code 701,
the City Clerk's Office would recommend imposing the following penalties for each:
1. $500 financial penalty.
2. Require all employees who serve liquor to attend server training.
3. Mandatory liquor code handbook to be available to all employees at
all times.
The Oasis Market has received two violations within six months. Therefore, if the
Council determines that the Oasis Market violated the Lino Lakes City Code 701,
the City Clerk's Office would recommend imposing the following penalties:
1. $1,500 financial penalty.
2. 10 days suspension, stayed. (Suspension imposed and revert to Non -
Best Practices Grid if third violation).
3. Require all employees who serve liquor to attend server training.
4. Mandatory liquor code handbook to be available to all employees at
All times.
•
•
•
June 2, 2004
American Legion Post 566
7731 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Attn: Dana Anderson
RE: Notice of Hearing to Suspend or Revoke Liquor License
Dear American Legion Post 566:
This is to notify you that a hearing has been scheduled for June 14, 2004 at 5:30 p.m.
before the Lino Lakes City Council to determine whether or not you have violated Lino
Lakes Ordinance 701, and what, if any, action shall be taken by the City Council. Please
be advised that the hearing will be held in the Council Chambers at the Lino Lakes City
Hall, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. It is alleged that on April 23,
2004, you violated Ordinance 701 by selling alcohol to a person underage.
Please be advised that Lino Lakes Ordinance 701, a copy of which is enclosed, provides
the City Council the authority to suspend or revoke any liquor license for a violation of
any provision or condition of this chapter or any State law or regulation governing the
sale of intoxicating liquor.
If you have any questions regarding this process, lease feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ann J. Blair
City Clerk
651- 982 -2400
cc: City Attorney
Police Chief David Pecchia
•
June 2, 2004
Miller's on Main
8001 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Attn: Chad Wagner
RE: Notice of Hearing to Suspend or Revoke Liquor License
Dear Miller's on Main:
This is to notify you that a hearing has been scheduled for June 14, 2004 at 5:30 p.m.
before the Lino Lakes City Council to determine whether or not you have violated Lino
Lakes Ordinance 701, and what, if any, action shall be taken by the City Council. Please
be advised that the hearing will be held in the Council Chambers at the Lino Lakes City
Hall, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. It is alleged that on April 23,
2004, you violated Ordinance 701 by selling alcohol to a person underage.
Please be advised that Lino Lakes Ordinance 701, a copy of which is enclosed, provides
the City Council the authority to suspend or revoke any liquor license for a violation of
any provision or condition of this chapter or any State law or regulation governing the
sale of intoxicating liquor.
If you have any questions regarding this process, lease feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ann J. Blair
City Clerk
651- 982 -2400
cc: City Attorney
Police Chief David Pecchia
•
•
June 2, 2004
Cir. Lex VFW (6583)
7868 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Attn: Store Manager
RE: Notice of Hearing to Suspend or Revoke Liquor License
Dear Cir. Lex VFW:
This is to notify you that a hearing has been scheduled for June 14, 2004 at 5:30 p.m.
411 before the Lino Lakes City Council to determine whether or not you have violated Lino
Lakes Ordinance 701, and what, if any, action shall be taken by the City Council. Please
be advised that the hearing will be held in the Council Chambers at the Lino Lakes City
Hall, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. It is alleged that on October
25, 2003, you violated Ordinance 701 by selling alcohol to a person underage.
Please be advised that Lino Lakes Ordinance 701, a copy of which is enclosed, provides
the City Council the authority to suspend or revoke any liquor license for a violation of
any provision or condition of this chapter or any State law or regulation governing the
sale of intoxicating liquor.
If you have any questions regarding this process, lease feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ann J. Blair
City Clerk
651- 982 -2400
cc: City Attorney
• Police Chief David Pecchia
•
•
•
June 2, 2004
Oasis Market
7509 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Attn: Shannon: Store Manager
RE: Notice of Hearing to Suspend or Revoke Liquor License
Dear Oasis Market:
This is to notify you that a hearing has been scheduled for June 14, 2004 at 5:30 p.m.
before the Lino Lakes City Council to deteiniine whether or not you have violated Lino
Lakes Ordinance 701, and what, if any, action shall be taken by the City Council. Please
be advised that the hearing will be held in the Council Chambers at the Lino Lakes City
Hall, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. It is alleged that on April 23,
2004, and also on October 25, 2003, you violated Ordinance 701 by selling alcohol to a
person underage.
Please be advised that Lino Lakes Ordinance 701, a copy of which is enclosed, provides
the City Council the authority to suspend or revoke any liquor license for a violation of
any provision or condition of this chapter or any State law or regulation governing the
sale of intoxicating liquor.
If you have any questions regarding this process, lease feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ann J. Blair
City Clerk
651- 982 -2400
cc: City Attorney
Police Chief David Pecchia
•
May 20, 2004
Brian Thorson
J & K Liquor
6013 Hodgson Road
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
RE: Notice of Hearing to Suspend or Revoke Liquor License
Dear Mr. Thorson:
This is to notify you that a hearing has been scheduled for June 14, 2004 at 6:00 p.m.
before the Lino Lakes City Council to determine whether or not you have violated Lino
Lakes Ordinance 701, the Liquor Code, and what, if any, action shall be taken by the City
Council. Please be advised that the hearing will be held in the Council Chambers at the
Lino Lakes City Hall, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota. It is alleged
that on April 23, 2004, the establishment ofJ & K Liquors violated Ordinance 701 by
selling alcohol to a person underage.
Please be advised that Lino Lakes Ordinance 701.10 provides the City Council the
authority to suspend or revoke any liquor license for a violation of any provision or
condition of this chapter or any State law or regulation governing the sale of intoxicating
liquor.
If you have any questions regarding this process, lease feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ann J. Blair
City Clerk
cc: City Attorney
Police Chief David Pecchia
•
•
Non -Best Practices Grid
On -sale
intoxicating
liquor
Off-sale
intoxicating
liquor
On -sale beer and
wine
Off-sale 3.2 malt
liquor
1 SI Violation
$500 and
5 days
suspension
$500 and
3 days
suspension
$500 and
5 days
suspension
$1,000 and
10 days
susoensi nn
Ind Violation
$1,000 and
10 days
suspension
$1,000 and
7 days
suspension
$1,000 and
10 days
suspension
Violation 4tn Violation
S2,000 and Revocation
15 days
suspension
$2,000 and
12 days
suspension
$2,000 and
15 days
suspension
Revocation
Revocation
$1,500 and
20 days
sus "ension
$2,000 and
40 days
Revocation
Best Practices Grid
Type of license
On -sale
intoxicating liquor
Off -sale
intoxicating liquor
On -sale beer and
we
Off -sale 3.2 malt
liquor
$500
$500
$500
1 St Violation
21tl Violation 3m Violation
$1,000 and
5 days suspension,
stayed
Return to regular grid
and off Best Practices for
one year.
$1,000 and
3 days suspension
stayed
Return to regular grid
and off Best Practices for
one year.
$1,000
$1,000 and
5 days suspension
stayed
Return to regular grid
and off Best Practices for
one year.
$1,500 and
10 days suspension
s
I stayed
Return to regular grid
and off Best Practices for
one year.
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 14, 2004
TOPIC: Consider Second Reading of Ordinance 14 -04,
Amending City Code to Include Water - Sprinkling Ban
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
As discussed in greater detail at the April 21st City Council Work Session, staff is
recommending that the City Code be amended to include a water - sprinkling ban. There
are several factors that have led to this recommendation.
As part of updating the City's Comprehensive Water Plan, a related issue that needs to
be addressed is our annual water appropriations permits from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR). On an annual basis, the city completes an
application to the DNR requesting a certain volume of water for consumption. The DNR
then takes into account several factors such as historic growth, existing conservation
measures, etc., to determine the city's permitted water volume. When cities exceed
their approved water appropriation, the DNR fines the offending city based upon the
amount of the overage. The city of Lino Lakes has exceeded the approved water
appropriation the past several years. If left unchecked, the fines can become quite
severe. There is currently a bill at the state legislature that, if approved, would allow the
DNR to issue fines up to $10,000 per violation.
There are several factors that the DNR takes into consideration when cities request a
higher annual appropriation. The most significant issue is the cities existing
conservation measures. The most common conservation measures are sprinkling bans
and tiered water rates. Since Lino Lakes does not have any type of a sprinkling ban in
place, our requests for additional appropriations have been denied. The same types of
conservation measures are evaluated when the DNR reviews requests for additional
well houses.
A large percentage of the resident's water consumption is directly correlated to summer
lawn sprinkling /irrigation. The table listed below summarizes the gallons of water
consumed per quarter in 2003. Quarter 1 (typically Jan - Mar) is considered the Base
Consumption, or domestic use that is attributed to typical household needs since
outdoor watering does not occur in the winter.
•
•
QUARTER
0
1st Quarter 2002
-•- , -■■•,
59,269,000
r-tiV v vv,.VV1n1 11 IVVJLI IVL{J
18,355
2nd Quarter 2002
66,217,000
20,200
3rd Quarter 2002
121,632,000
36,146
4th Quarter 2002
107,660,000
31,360
Total 2002
354,778,000
26,665
1st Quarter 2003
63,449,000
18,317
2nd Quarter 2003
74,367,000
21,317
3rd Quarter 2003
185,594,000
52,309
4th Quarter 2003
190,205,000
53,071
Total 2003
513,615,000
36,406
Historically, Lino Lakes has had the luxury of being able to meet the peak consumption
demands of residents without imposing formal restrictions. The dry conditions we
experienced last year put an extreme burden on our water supply system. Peak water
demand exceeded production throughout the summer months while overnight demand
allowed tower levels to only slightly recover. We are also at the point of potentially
comprising our public safety and fire protection capabilities. For example, the Insurance
Services Organization recommends that our system be capable of a sustained flow of
3,500 gpm for a four -hour duration. The ability of our system to meet this criterion while
also supplying peak domestic demand is doubtful.
For the reasons explained above, as well as the philosophy that the city of Lino Lakes
should be environmentally responsible to conserve our precious resources, staff is
recommending that a sprinkling ban be implemented. The proposed ordinance
implements an odd /even sprinkling ban from May 15 - September 15. The City
Administrator will also have the authority to further restrict the sprinkling of lawns as
needed when an extreme water shortage exists. The first violation shall result in a $25
citation, and a $50 subsequent violation to those individuals who repeat violations within
the same calendar year.
The adoption of seasonal watering restrictions is a necessary and reasonable measure
to control water consumption during periods of peak demand. A sprinkling ban with
reasonable enforcement will put us in a better position to increase our annual water
appropriations. Also, a sprinkling ban with reasonable enforcement will delay the need
for additional well houses that are very costly to build and maintain. In order to be
allowed to increase our water appropriations and build additional well houses, a
sprinkling ban needs to be implemented.
Staff is in the process of educating /informing our residents through various means
including the front page of the upcoming city newsletter, information in utility billings, the
Consumer Confidence Water Report that is sent to all residents connected to the water
system, and signage at entrances to several residential subdivisions. It is staff's
position that this year we will be concentrating on informing the public of the new
sprinkling ordinance, not taking enforcement measures until 2005.
The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 14 -04, Amending City Code to
Include Water - Sprinkling Ban, at the May 24, 2004 City Council meeting.
•
•
The timeline of this ordinance is as follows:
May 24, 2004
June 14,2004
June 22, 2004
July 22, 2004
Public Hearing and 1st Reading
2nd Reading
Published in Quad Community Press
Ordinance in Effect
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance 14 -04, amending City Code to include
Water Sprinkling Ban.
2. Return to staff.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
410 6/7/2004
RD /Utilities/ 2nd reading Greensheet sprinkling ban
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 14-04
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE, CHAPTER 400 WATER AND SEWER,
BY ADDING SUBDIVISIONS 1 -4 UNDER SECTION 401.02, SEASONAL SPRINKLING RESTRICTIONS,
TO ALLOW SEASONAL SPRINKLING RESTRICTIONS ON SPRINKLING OR WATERING OF LAWNS
AND GARDENS FROM MAY 15 TO SEPTEMBER 15 EACH YEAR; PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT ODD -
NUMBERED PROPERTY ADDRESSES MAY WATER ON ODD - NUMBERED DAYS, AND EVEN -
NUMBERED PROPERTY ADDRESSES MAY WATER ON EVEN- NUMBERED DAYS
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
The City Code of the City of Lino Lakes, Section 401.02, Use of Water Restricted to Authorized
Persons, is amended as follows:
400 Water and Sewer
401. Municipal Water System
401.01 General Operation. The city municipal water system (hereinafter called
the water system) shall be operated as a public utility and convenience from which revenue will
be derived, subject to the provisions of this chapter.
401.02 Use of Water Restriction to Authorized Persons. No person shall make,
construct, or install any water service installation or make use of any water service which is
connected to the water system except in the manner provided in this chapter.
Section 1. 401.02 of the City Ordinances of the City of Lino Lakes is hereby
amended to include the following:
Subdivision 1. Seasonal Sprinkling Restrictions. To protect the health and safety of
the consumers and the general welfare of the City, and to encourage water conservation, the City
hereby adopts the following permanent sprinkling ban. The sprinkling or watering of lawns and
gardens is prohibited from Mav 15 to September 15 each year provided, however, that odd -
numbered property addresses may water on odd - numbered day s, and even - numbered property
addresses may water on even - numbered days.
Subdivision 2. Authority to Restrict Use. The City of Lino Lakes hereby reserves
the right to limit the use of water from the City water supply and distribution system and to
.rescribe emercenc conditions for use of water. The City Administrator ma in his/her
discretion implement emergency measures if necessary supplementing the sprinkling ban under
Subdivision 1 with a total prohibition on sprinkling.
apply to:
Subdivision 3. Exceptions. The sprinkling ban under subdivision 2 does not
a. Property owners using a private well for sprinkling;
•
•
ORDINANCE No. 14 -04
b. Property owners who water new sod for the first twelve weeks after it is
sodded or water new seed for the first twelve weeks after it is seeded;
Subdivision 4. Violation. No person shall cause water to be used in violation of the
provisions of this section. The first violation shall result in a $25 citation, and a $50
subsequent citation for those individuals who repeat violations.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty
(30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of , 2004.
ATTEST:
Date of Publication
Effective Date
City Clerk
- 4 3 -
Mayor
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 6/14/04
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -77 Approving the
Lino Lakes Economic Development Advisory
Committee (EDAC) 2004 -2005 Action Plan
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple majority
BACKGROUND:
See EDAC report.
OPTIONS:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 04 -77 approving the EDAC action plan
2. Do not approve the EDAC action plan
3. Return to EDAC for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
•
•
•
Lino Lakes Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC)
Date: 6/14/04
To: Mayor and City Council
From: EDAC
Howard Juni, Chair
Julie Schwartz, Vice Chair
Don Gorowsky
Fred Chase
Jason Helgemoe
Harvey Karth
Toni Vacha
Steve Rymer
Kathy Hansmann
RE: 2004 -2005 Action Plan
EDAC periodically reviews and updates its working plan for economic
development to ensure it continues to stay on track with the city's objectives and
the mission statement of the committee to:
Promote a diverse tax based by:
• Encouraging a balance of land uses
• Maintaining and encouraging the growth of existing businesses
• Actively facilitating the development and redevelopment of quality commercial
and light industrial development
In the 12 years since the city developed an Economic Development Plan and
established the committee, Lino Lakes has seen considerable growth in
residential, industrial and commercial uses. EDAC's goal of relying less on the
residential tax base is on track with its projections as stated in the
Comprehensive Plan, with 8 percent of the tax base now commercial /industrial.
In addition, many new jobs have been created, underutilized land is now
generating taxes, and residents have more opportunity to spend their dollars
within the community.
Among the successes the city has realized in economic development:
• Apollo Business Park is close to full buildout and much of it is now
generating 0/1 taxes for the community. Emtech is the only owner -
occupied business to leave the business park in 10 years and it was
replaced by Synovis, a growing medical device manufacturer. The park
•
provided leasing opportunities for numerous small companies as well, and
approximately 1,000 jobs were brought to the community.
• A master plan was completed and a developer secured for a downtown
Lino Lakes by holding fast to the vision of improving the city's identity,
requiring high architectural standards, creating a community gathering
place, providing diversity in housing, and opportunities for more retail and
service business within the city.
• Established anchor stores were brought to the Town Center area to
provide much needed convenience to the residents, and to act as a
catalyst for continued growth and development of the Town Center.
• Responsible use of public incentives, including tax increment financing
and tax abatement, proved productive in leveraging private investment in
the community, with more than $21 million in industrial tax base now on
the tax roles and many more millions projected in the near future.
The 2004 -2005 action plan focuses on reordering some of EDAC's priorities
based on realistic assumptions for growth and changing market demand. The
goals that have been accomplished have given way to new opportunities. Some
of the highlights of the action plan include:
1. Woods Edge (formerly the Village) is the committee's first priority. Not only
will the development generate significantly more tax base for the
community, it will provide additional opportunities by making the city a
more desirable place to live and do business. EDAC supports continued
commitment by the city council, including the responsible use of public
incentives, to ensure this project is completed.
2. EDAC recognizes that the 35E corridor has tremendous development
potential and promotes a city strategy for public involvement, long range
master planning and public investment to ensure highest and best use of
the corridor.
3. EDAC supports a Tong -range development and redevelopment strategy for
the entire Town Center area around the 35W interchange.
4. In conjunction with Town Center development, an orderly plan for
redevelopment of Lake Drive will enable the city to take advantage of
opportunities as they arise. It is critical for the city to have a proactive
implementation plan and financing strategies in place to promote
redevelopment of blighted areas and relocation of nonconforming uses.
5. EDAC also places continuing emphasis on supporting existing business
within the city, improving the image of Lino Lakes within the business and
development communities, and making the city a friendly, responsive
place to do business.
The city is at a critical juncture in determining its future. Best management
practices, the evolution of the needs and desires of the community, the creation
of quality and balanced and use, are all issues that evolve over time as we learn
and gain insight into what makes a city sustainable over time.
•
EDAC is seeking direction from the city council through approval of this action
plan as an indication that the plan is in conformance with the city's policies and
goals.
•
•
•
•
ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN
EDAC, 2004
A. TEAM
1. Economic Development Authority
Mayor John Bergeson
Council member Donna Carlson
Council member Caroline Dahl
Council member Jeff Reinert
Council member Dan Stoltz
2. Economic Development Advisory Committee
Howard Juni, Chair
Julie Jeffrey - Schwartz, Vice Chair
Fred Chase
Don Gorowsky
Jason Helgemoe
Harvey Karth
Steve Rymer
Kathy Hansmann
Tom Vacha
3. Community Development Staff
Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
Mary Alice Divine, Economic Development Coordinator
Jeff Smyser, City Planner
Jim Studenski, City Engineer
Marty Asleson, Environmental Coordinator
Dawn Bugge, Community Development Secretary
4. Consultants
Springsted
Kennedy & Graven
SEH
1
• B. PROJECTS
1. Town Center Development (Woods Edge)
2. I -35E Corridor Development
3. Town Center Development
4. Lake Drive Development
5. Apollo Business Park
C. PROGRAMS
1. Local Business Retention
2. Lino Lakes Promotional Program
3. Prospect Subsidy Evaluation
4. Economic Development Evaluation
D. FUTURE PROJECTS
1. 49/J Redevelopment
2. 1 -35E /J Development
•
•
•
ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN PROJECTS
1. TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT (Woods Edge)
2003 REVIEW: Many of the strategies have been accomplished, but critical decisions
ahead will determine the success of the project. A master developer, Hartford Group,
completed a purchase agreement for the Tagg property and the city property. SEH was
hired by the city to complete the design of public improvements. A redevelopment TIF
district was approved for the Tagg property. The preliminary plat and rezone to PUD
was approved, with the Calthorpe Design Standards as the governing standards for
development. A public improvement feasibility study is underway. The YMCA continues
to raise funds for the construction of a 45,000 SF facility.
PURPOSE:
Facilitate the development of Woods Edge as the focal point of
the Town Center as "downtown" Lino Lakes based on the guiding
principles established in the Calthorpe Master Plan.
TIME FRAME: 2004 -2006
IIIASSIGNED TO: Community Development pment staff, EDAC, consultants
STRATEGY:
•
1 Recognizing this as the city's major economic development
priority in 2004, support and promote a development
agreement between the city and the developer that:
a. Ensures development that meets the objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan and the Calthorpe Master
Plan.
b. Completes the sale of the city -owned property.
c. Recognizes the need for public financing to generate
tax base well beyond what the site would generate
if left to develop on its own, and also recognizes
that this high quality development will make Lino
Lakes a more desirable place to do business.
d. Uses opportunities from additional tax base
generated to finance public improvements, including
the city's commitment to the YMCA, and
improvements to Lake Drive and the 35W
interchange.
3
•
•
2. Complete the marketing program in coordination with
developers to inform potential new commercial businesses of
the unique opportunities available in Woods Edge.
3. Apply for 2004 Livable Communities Demonstration Program
funding.
4. Continue working in partnership with the YMCA to complete
plans for the construction of a facility.
PROJECTED RESULTS:
The Woods Edge project will incorporate public facilities into a
mixed -use commercial /residential development center to provide
municipal services, a physical sense of identity for the City, an
active, pedestrian- oriented environment, and a profitable business
center. A City initiative will use city facilities and the YMCA as a
means to stimulate private development, increase the value of
land along I -35W, enhance the City's tax base, and provide more
direct control over the quality of development within the City.
4
•
•
2. 35E CORRIDOR
The 35E Corridor is a major commercial/industrial development opportunity with
approximately 1,443 acres of land in the R -BR. The Clearwater Creek Development
Center south of County Road 14 is still largely undeveloped. Highway improvements for
County Road 14 east of 35E are scheduled for 2005. Major reconstruction of County Road
14 west of 35E and the 35E interchange is also being planned. Two large development
opportunities are in early discussion stages.
PURPOSE: Coordinate the planning of the 35E Corridor to ensure
comprehensive policies for design, development and financing are in
place to promote high quality commercial /industrial land uses.
TIME FRAME: 2 -4 years
ASSIGNED TO: Community Development staff, EDAC, consultants, council and
boards
STRATEGY:
1. Facilitate the development of Clearwater Creek Development
Center as a generator of tax base to provide a source of public
revenue for major infrastructure improvements on the 35E
interchange.
2. Participate in the Master Planning process proposed by
Benchmark Community Builder Collaborative to ensure the
highest and best use for the 360 -acre site north and west of the
interchange.
3. Promote the use of tax increment generated by new
development to finance needed public improvements, thus
promoting additional economic development.
4. Continue a productive working relationship with local
landowners and jointly market land to private light industrial and
commercial companies and developers.
5. Promote the redevelopment potential of the Clearwater Creek
Development Center to enhance its marketability.
5
•
•
•
PROJECTED RESULTS
An integrated plan that is proactive in its approach to transportation improvements, land
use, and greenway development to ensure this major development corridor is designed
to foster high quality light industrial, commercial and residential use. This plan will allow
the City to facilitate the orderly economic development of the eastern "door" to Lino
Lakes to enhance the city's tax base.
6
•
3. TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT
2003 Review:
PURPOSE:
The Town Center is comprised of the four quadrants of the
35W /Lake Drive interchange. The Marketplace Development
(northeast quadrant) saw the completion of a DQ Grill & Chill and
a multi- tenant retail center. Discount Tires in under construction.
Ryan Companies continues marketing space on the remainder of
the Ryan site with the intent to build multi- tenant buildings.
Apollo Center (northwest quadrant) is a multi- tenant center under
construction.
Facilitate the development of the Town Center area to ensure
high quality mix of retail, service, restaurant and office space that
services the needs of the residents and draws on the regional
market for success.
• TIME FRAME: 2004 -2006
ASSIGNED TO: Community Development Staff, EDAC
STRATEGY:
•
1. Continue to work with developers, landowners and prospects.
2. Identify redevelopment opportunities within the Town Center
and recommend public investment strategies to facilitate
redevelopment of blighted and underutilized land.
3. Continue long range planning efforts to integrate existing and
new development through a mix of uses, connecting
pedestrian walkways, architecture and landscaping.
PROJECTED RESULTS:
The Town Center will create a physical sense of identity for the
City, and a profitable business center that will increase the value
of land along I -35W, enhance the City's tax base. The will
become the major shopping center in Lino Lakes and will create
spin -off development along Lake Drive.
7
•
4. LAKE DRIVE DEVELOPMENT
2003 Review: An evaluation of the potential for a Redevelopment TIF
District was completed for the sites west and north of the
Target site.
PURPOSE: Establish an environment that favors more orderly
commercial and industrial growth on Lake Drive from
Hodgson Road to Main Street in Lino Lakes.
TIME FRAME: 2002 -2010
ASSIGNED TO: Community Development team
STRATEGY:
1. Identify areas for redevelopment due to existing non-
conforming conditions, compatibility problems or under -
utilization of the site.
2. Facilitate the development of new mixed use retail and office
centers on Lake Drive, including the city owned parcels (3
acres), by promoting redevelopment TIF to assist in the
purchase and demolition of non - conforming uses.
3. Market and sell the city owned parcel on Lake Drive /Hodgson
Road.
4. Identify opportunities to consolidate site access points and
promote shared driveways.
PROJECTED RESULTS:
Development of Lake Drive from Hodgson Road to Main Street in
a manner that realizes its full potential and meets the objectives
for Lake Drive in the Comprehensive Plan
8
•
5. APOLLO BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT
2003 REVIEW: One 10 -acre site and one 2.2 -acre site are available. Staff continues
to work with Griffin Properties to market the sites. In addition, one 3-
acre site is now available for resale. These parcels are within TIF
District No. 1 -9, which was established in 1998 and does not have
enough remaining capacity to provide assistance. TIF District No. 1 -7
was decertified, and $10 million in industrial tax base is now on the
tax roles. Leasable space available has provided opportunities for
numerous small companies to move to the city. Synovis (formerly Jer-
neen, a medical parts manufacturer,) has become one of the city's
largest employers.
PURPOSE: Continue marketing the Apollo Business Park to full buildout.
411/ TIME FRAME: Two years
ASSIGNED TO: City staff, EDAC
STRATEGY:
•
1. Facilitate the full development of the G.M. Development sites.
2. Initiate a meeting with business owners to discuss the development of an
improvement plan for outdoor storage, trash containment, signage,
lighting and landscaping.
3. Evaluate the cost/benefit of facilitating the development of the remaining
parcels by establishing a new TIF District.
PROJECTED RESULTS:
Full development of Apollo Business Park, realizing the optimal tax
base of approximately $40 million and close to one million square feet
of light industrial space.
9
•
ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN PROGRAMS
1. LOCAL BUSINESS RETENTION PROGRAM
2003 Review:
PURPOSE:
Staff features local business in city newsletter. Staff initiated
discussion with Schwann's and Mountain Machine regarding
relocation potential. Staff serves on board of directors of Quad
Area Chamber of Commerce and promotes Lino Lakes businesses
and networking opportunities through the Chamber.
To provide an atmosphere of support and recognition of local
business and industry's contribution to Lino Lakes and to
encourage growth within the City.
TIME FRAME: Annual
ASSIGNED TO: EDAC and Economic Development staff
• STRATEGY: 1. Continue initiating regular contact with businesses in Lino
Lakes to develop a positive public /private relationship.
2. Encourage the use of public incentives to move incompatible
existing businesses located within the city to compatible sites
within Lino Lakes.
3. Continue updating the inventory of existing businesses for on-
going communications.
4. Work with the local media to publicize achievements and
contributions of local businesses within the community.
5. Work with the local Chambers of Commerce to provide
additional support to local businesses.
PROJECTED RESULTS:
The program is expected to enhance communication between
local businesses and the City to produce a positive business
climate, support growth and retain industry within the City.
Acting as a partner with local business will enhance the City's
reputation for being receptive to quality economic development.
10
•
2. LINO LAKES PROMOTIONAL PROGRAM
2003 Review: Woods Edge has been in St. Paul Pioneer Press, Quad Press, two
business monthlies and other media. Hartford Group has prepared
preliminary promotional materials. A display of the project is in
city hall. A documentation of C/l land was completed in 2002.
PURPOSE: Focus the marketing /promotional campaign to effectively
define the image Lino Lakes wishes to enhance, define the target
audience, and communicate that image through a variety of public
relations efforts.
TIME FRAME: Annual
ASSIGNED TO: Community Development staff, EDAC
• STRATEGY:
•
1. Develop a marketing plan and promotional materials with
private development team to effectively communicate the
Woods Edge development to the community, developer leads,
the media and targeted businesses.
2. Complete documentation of commercial and industrial land
uses for annual EDAC review and for marketing areas of the
city available for commercial /industrial development
PROJECTED RESULTS:
The development of a Lino Lakes "image" as a community
offering high quality housing, excellent business opportunities,
good schools, and a country -like atmosphere close to the heart of
the metro area.
11
• 3. PROSPECT SUBSIDY EVALUATION
•
•
2003 REVIEW.•
PURPOSE:
Regular review and evaluation the City's financing program
as part of long range economic development planning to
optimize the use of tax increment financing and other funding
sources.
TIME FRAME: Annual
ASSIGNED TO: Finance Director /Economic Development Assistant
STRATEGY:
1. Reevaluate the city's TIF policy to ensure it is compatible with
the city's goals and objectives.
2. Prioritize the potential uses for business subsidies to ensure
that the city's financial tools and limited resources are
resulting in the highest potential development.
3. Continue public education regarding the appropriate use of
financial tools to encourage development, the long -term
benefits of city participation in commercial /industrial growth,
and the need to ensure financial stability through a broad tax
base that is less dependent on residential taxes.
PROJECTED RESULTS:
An ongoing evaluation of current and future uses business
subsidies will promote development within the City in a manner
that most effectively benefits the city's tax base.
12
•
•
•
4. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION
PURPOSE:
TIME FRAME:
Periodic review and evaluation of city policies, plans and
procedures to ensure the mechanisms available to the city are
implementing the city's objective to strengthen the tax base.
ASSIGNED TO: Community Development Staff, EDAC, P &Z, Environmental
Board, City Council
STRATEGY:
1. Support the city council in a periodic review of the city's Land
Use, Transportation, Utilities and Growth Management Plan to
determine if adjustments are necessary to meet the city's
goals and objectives.
2. Encourage the involvement of citizens and business owners in
public discussions if it is determined that periodic strategy
realignment is necessary.
PROJECTED RESULTS:
Effective management practices that protect the city's natural
resources, achieve economic sustainability and maintain high
standards for growth and development.
13
•
FUTURE PROJECTS
1. I -35E /COUNTY ROAD J
2. HODGSON ROAD /COUNTY ROAD J
•
•
14
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 6/14/04
TOPIC:
Resolution No. 04 -78 authorizing application for a
Opportunity Grant through the Livable Communities
Demonstration Program
Vote Required: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
As part of the city's participation in the Minnesota Livable Communities Act,
funds are made available to cities to promote the purposes of the Act.
Opportunity Grants are available to help projects in the predevelopment phase
that show potential for supporting staged development, and centers with
convenient access to transportation and transportation corridors. The goals of
the program include: linking local and regional transportation systems;
connecting housing and centers of employment, education, retail and recreation;
and developing a range of housing densities, types and costs.
As a part of the master planning process by Benchmark Community Builder
Collaborative, the developer intends to complete an Alternative Urban Areawide
Review (AUAR) of the 360 -acre site on 35E. An AUAR is a type of environmental
assessment used to assess potential cumulative environmental impacts from
future development covering a broad geographic area. The more traditional EAW
method focuses on smaller - scale, project- specific assessments.
The amount of available land on this regional corridor offers the potential for
large -scale commercial and industrial projects. Often, when large sites are
developed, the required environmental assessment is done in a piecemeal
fashion, with each project looking only within the boundaries of its site.
Staff has made application for an Opportunity Grant in the amount of $75,000 to
expand the scope of the Benchmark AUAR to include approximately 1,400
additional acres along 35E from Cedar Street to 80th Street. This includes review
of the 35E /CSAH 14 interchange area, the Clearwater Creek industrial area, and
much of the Rural Business Reserve. In an AUAR, after environmental impacts
are identified, a mitigation plan is prepared. As long as development projects in
the AUAR study area follow the development patterns and mitigation guidelines
contained in the AUAR, no further environmental review is necessary.
A 25 percent local match is required if a city receives an opportunity grant. If Lino
Lakes receives funding, the developer costs attributed to the Benchmark site
AUAR would be the local match.
OPTIONS:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 04 -78 authorizing application for an Opportunity
Grant through the Livable Communities Demonstration Program
2. Do not authorize application for the grant.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1.
•
•
• LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT
OPPORTUNITY GRANT APPLICATION FORM 2004
•
•
Office Use
Instructions: Submit form and attachments by 4:30 p.m. on June 2, 2004. Use font size 11. Use of
bulleted lists is encouraged. Do not attach a coversheet or use any graphic images on top of the application
form. Limit application to 7 pages plus attachments, for a total of 10 pages.
Project Information:
Project Name:
35E Corridor
Applicant (city or county):
City of Lino Lakes
Project Location (city):
Lino Lakes
Address (street boundaries or
major intersection):
I -35E Corridor between Cedar Street and 80th Street
Primary Project Contact: Name:
Title:
Mary Alice Divine
Economic Development Coordinator
Address:
600 Town Center Parkway
Phone:
651/982 -2423
Fax:
651/982 -2499
E -mail:
mdivine @ci.lino- lakes.mn.us
Authorized city or county official(s) -
names and titles for contract
execution
John Bergeson, Mayor
Gordon Heitke, City Administrator
Project Summary
In the space provided, summarize the issues you will address and your objectives and plans for the subject
site.
(Limit 20 lines)
Benchmark Community Builder Collaborative (the developer) has begun a master planning process for a 360 -
acre site along the 35E corridor in Lino Lakes (The Benchmark Site). This public process will include developer
costs for an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), market research, a survey, citizen workshops and
field excursions. In addition, a one million sq. ft. regional showroom/warehouse is being proposed on another
site on 35E, which will require an EIS. These sites are critical greenfield developments within this underutilized
regional corridor. Often, when large sites such as this are developed, the required environmental review is done
in a piecemeal fashion.
Recognizing that the 35E corridor is a major growth area within the regional framework, the city is requesting
assistance to enlarge the scope of the AUAR to include approximately 1,400 additional acres along 35E from
Cedar Street on the south to 80th Street on the north. This includes:
• 35E /County Road 14 interchange
• Clearwater Creek Development Center (± 240 acres of undeveloped industrial property)
• ± 240 acres of commercially zoned undeveloped land on the interchange
• ±120 acres of land designated for medium and high density housing, and
• ± 800 acres of Rural Business Reserve (land set aside for future commercial/industrial development.)
The AUAR will identify future staged development scenarios and the impacts on traffic, regional infrastructure,
ecologically sensitive resources, water use and stormwater runoff. It will evaluate the cumulative effects of
development and formulate a mitigation plan. The result will be a framework for development that will
interconnect housing, jobs and shopping, protect and enhance the natural resources, and identify transportation
needs and regional sewer capacity.
- 6 4 -
1. Project Funding Request and Timeline (Limit one page, landscape layout)
Awards must be matched by a 25% local contribution, which can include in -kind and other contributions.
Source of
Local
Contribution
Benchmark
Community
Builders
$7,500
0
. N
m
000`Z$
o
m
c
N
o
r'
0
�
m
o
v
69
0
0
N
m
Request
��
69
69
00S`L$
000`9$
000`9$
$3,750
/
69
OSZ`Z$
k
7
000`SL$
End Date
September
005 for all
tasks
TOTAL:
TOTAL::
Start Date
September 2004
.`\
Ye'.Z J p�T �k yid' iYgp
Res `onstble Pei son s)
Michael Grochala, City
•f Lino Lakes
.Yh
Proposed Qutconligi
Determine traffic and pedestrian
nodes, air and noise impacts.
Enhance connectivity, determine
zoning and land use impacts.
Determine water networks, and
flows, mitigate against possible
pollutants.
Determine the impact of
increased impervious surfaces.
Wetland Delineation; location
and identification of soils
Evaluate land cover throughout
the area to guide development.
Determine sewer and water
availability.
Determine if rare species exist,
provide plan of preservation.
Evaluation of visual corridors
looking interior and exterior of
:he site.
Task / Eli ':'ible Cost
Transportation I►npacts Analysis
Land Use Impacts Analysis
Groundwater I►npacts
Surface Water Impacts
Soil Impact Analysis
Land Cover and Agricultural
Composition
Regional and local Infrastructure
Wildlife /Habitat Impacts
Visual Analysis
/
\ }-
•
n
- 6 5 -
n
m
CN
3
4.1. Regulatory Status (start new page)
A. Please mark (X) the boxes, as applicable, and briefly provide additional information as noted.
If not applicable, place `NA' in the box.
Will be
Needed
Underway
Completed
Completed
NA
Anticipated Date of Completion
Comprehensive plan amendment. If needed, please describe:
Master plans
Summer 2005 for Benchmark Site
An AUAR will not in itself require an amendment to the Comp Plan. It will not be
known if an amendment is needed for the Benchmark Site until completion of the
Market studies
Master Planning process. The proposed land uses within that site call for
industrial, and medium and high density housing. An amendment may be required
to permit commercial uses also.
X
Zoning changes and variances. If needed, please list and include change
to /from:
Summer 2005 for Benchmark Site
The Benchmark Site will likely be rezoned to Planned Unit Development once the
master plan is complete. A significant portion of the enlarged AUAR site is zoned
Rural Business Reserve and will be rezoned with development. The rest of the
area is zoned commercial and industrial and should not need to be rezoned.
B. Please mark (X) the boxes, as applicable. If underway, state anticipated date of completion.
-
Will be
Developed
Underway
Completed
Anticipated Date of Completion
X
Master plans
Summer 2005 for Benchmark Site
X
Market studies
Summer 2005 for Benchmark Site
X
Design standards
Summer 2005 for Benchmark Site
3. Evaluation Criteria
3A. Describe plans or potential to address issues in the following areas for the project location.
Be concise, keeping responses to 15 lines for each question.
Al. Use Land Efficiently
Will achieve this objective in ways such as:
Developed Communities or locations:
• Make cost - effective use of infrastructure and
increase density.
• Convert or reuse declining or underutilized
lands to accommodate growth forecasts, ensure
efficient utilization of infrastructure investments
and meet community needs.
Developine Communities or locations:
• Convert or reuse declining or underutilized
lands to accommodate growth forecasts, ensure
efficient utilization of infrastructure
investments, and meet community needs.
Include land use patterns that will facilitate
groundwater recharge to protect the region's
water supply
• 2030 regional population forecast is 59,803; average daily traffic
forecast is 96,000 on 35E and 31,700 on the 35E interchange
(based on CSAH 14 TAZ information).
• Significant investment in reconstruction of the 35E bridge and
CSAH 14 is forecasted. Anoka County, MnDOT and Lino Lakes
will share costs.
• An AUAR will determine greenway and water networks that
enhance the living and working environment, preserve
groundwater quality and improve stormwater runoff into the Rice
Creek Chain of Lakes.
• This is one of the last remaining undeveloped tracts on a major
interstate so close to the heart of the metro area. A development
framework can determine relationships between the parts,
including pedestrian and vehicular nodes, site entrances, and
scale of uses.
- 6 6 -
.2 Develop land uses linked to the local
and regional transportation systems.
Will achieve this objective in ways such as:
Developed Communities or location:
• Include land use patterns that support transit
service and development.
• Include local transportation, transit, pedestrian
and bicycle investments to improve connections
between workplaces, residences, retail, services
and entertainment activities.
Developinc Communities or locations:
• Support the transportation needs of the planned
build -out of the community.
• Improve transportation connections and
address /incorporate commuting issues such as
park and rides, express bus service.
• Include land use patterns to support transit
development and service expansion
The following transportation studies now underway:
1. A coalition of the cities of Lino Lakes, Centerville, Forest Lake,
Hugo and Columbus Township, Anoka and Washington Counties
and MnDOT have been meeting to develop a cohesive
transportation system, balance land use and transportation, and
identify, develop and support regional improvements.
2. Lino Lakes is part of a MnDOT initiated I -35 Inter Regional
Corridor Study to develop a common vision and management
approach to the corridor from I -694 north to Hinckley.
3. Lino Lakes is participating with Anoka County and MnDOT in a
CSAH 14 Study from 35E to 35W through Lino Lakes and
Centerville, including the 35E /CSAH 14 interchange.
These studies are indicating a need for transportation systems upgrading.
An AUAR will help to plan ahead of development to incorporate transit,
park and rides, and coordinate land use activity.
A.3 Connect housing and centers of
employment, education, retail,
recreation uses.
Will achieve this objective in ways such as:
Developed Communities or locations:
• Provide infill development, redevelopment, and
adaptive reuse of structures to connect housing
and jobs, and integrate new development into
existing neighborhoods.
Seveloping Communities or locations:
Build connections between workplaces,
residences, retail, services and entertainment
activities.
A.4 Develop a range of housing densities,
types and costs.
Will achieve this objective in ways such as:
Developed Communities or locations:
• Integrate new housing into existing
neighborhoods
Developing Communities or locations:
• Include housing planned to take into account
population forecasts, existing housing stock,
current and future community needs.
An AUAR is precisely what is needed to ensure a development
framework is in place that adheres to the principles of connectivity. A
"big picture" approach will look at all the development that will occur
within the area. Individual projects will need to follow the development
patterns and mitigation guidelines contained in the AUAR.
The following are just a few reasons an AUAR is important:
• The 35E Corridor impacts more than just Lino Lakes.
Connectivity with major housing developments in abutting Hugo
and Centerville can be addressed.
• The land use plan allows medium and high density residential,
industrial and commercial activities. Integrating these uses can
provide an environment where people can live, work and shop.
• As a major commuter corridor with large undeveloped tracts of
land, it provides an excellent opportunity to expand transit
services, and build a park and ride.
The city's land use plan contains ± 120 acres guided for medium and high
density housing within the 360 -acre site that Benchmark Community
Builder Collaborative —the same developer that master planned the
Ramsey Town Center —is now master planning in Lino Lakes. The city
has a modest amount of medium density housing and has plans for a town
center on 35W that includes high density apartments, condos and
townhomes. Because of the fractured nature of the city due to the regional
park and two interstate freeways, the community seeks to provide this
diversity in housing on its east side. This can be best accomplished by
integrating it with surrounding uses, creating a transportation network
that encourages integration, and meeting market demands.
•
4
-67-
A.5 Abate, prevent or remove point and
non -point source pollution, and
aaximize groundwater recharge
through surface water infiltration.
Will achieve this objective in ways such as :
Developed Communities or locations:
• Restore natural resources where feasible and
appropriate.
• Control and treat stormwater, as feasible and
appropriate.
Developing Communities or locations:
• Abate, prevent or remove point and non -point
source pollution; reduces soil erosion; protects
or improves water quality; maximizes
groundwater recharge through surface water
infiltration. as feasible and appropriate.
An AUAR will give the city the ability to address the following on a
comprehensive scale:
• The Benchmark Site is heavily drain tiled from agricultural uses.
This is an opportunity to promote infiltration through the creation
of surface water treatment trains to filter water and maintain
predevelopment volumes.
• Preserve and restore natural features to hydrological conditions
that will support them.
• Preserve an existing waterfowl habitat.
• Provide buffers for Clearwater and Hardwood Creeks.
• Investigate and mitigate outfalls, where pollution concentrates
from agricultural and industrial uses.
• Plant native landscaping along treatment trains and ponds.
• Protect soils from compaction during construction.
A.6 Replicability
• Describe plans or potential for any of
the project's land use elements (Al-
A5) to be implemented elsewhere in
your community
Lino Lakes has suffered from piecemeal development in the past and
hopes to reverse that course. Woods Edge, the planned downtown on
35W, is viewed as a break from the city's conventional approach to
suburban development. That plan calls for residential, commercial,
recreational and civic uses within a pedestrian friendly environment.
Planning for development on 35E is an attempt to replicate the principles
of integrated uses, auto /pedestrian balance, design quality, and
environmental sustainability, to create places that withstand the test of
time. But because of the scale of the development potential, an AUAR is
a necessary step to get started on the right track.
Future sites that will benefit from a "big picture" planning process:
• Lake Drive redevelopment from CSAH 49 to CSAH 14.
• A large sod farm in the northwest corner of the city.
•
5
-68-
3B. Tools and Processes to Ensure Successful Outcomes (start new page)
•
.s .1 Describe current status, plans
for, or potential to use processes
and regulatory tools, such as
zoning codes, design standards,
development standards, etc., to
implement the project
• The Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan was completed in 2002.
• The city's zoning ordinances were revised to implement the
Comprehensive Plan.
• The Benchmark Site master plan will include design and development
standards.
• The city's Parks and Trail Plan is undergoing revision to focus on
implementation strategies for park systems, greenway (natural open space)
systems, and natural resource stewardship.
• An Economic Development Tax Increment Financing District will be
established in the industrial park to provide a funding source for the 35E
infrastructure improvements.
B.2 Describe current status, plans
for or potential for public - private
partnerships to implement this
project.
• The Benchmark Community Builder Collaborative will be funding its
portion of the AUAR.
• The master planning process for the Benchmark site will be 100 percent
developer financed.
• Tax base generated from the potential $1 billion development will leverage
the city's ability to enhance the public realm.
3C. Community Support
• Describe the local political
and /or community
commitment in supporting
this project (e.g. city council
initiatives or actions,
community initiatives or
participation). Describe any
current or planned public
participation processes (of
residents, businesspersons
and others) in developing the
proposal.
• A meeting in April 2004 kicked off the master planning process for the
Benchmark Site. City Council and all its advisory boards participated in a
workshop to discuss how the process will proceed. Next steps include:
o Identifying key constituents
o Involving citizens in a visioning process
o Visiting precedent communities
o Conducting market research
o Communicating progress to the public
o Sharing findings and building a consensus for a master plan.
6
- 6 9 -
3D. Other Evaluation Criteria
•
• Timeliness — describe any
issues related to timeliness of
the opportunity to
accomplish this project (e.g.
moving or closing of
businesses in the site area,
circumstances of a current
opportunity to direct
development consistent with
city goals).
•
•
It is critical to proceed with an expanded AUAR in 2004:
• The Benchmark Site, long considered one of the most developable
Greenfield sites in Lino Lakes, is under contract and the master planning
process has commenced.
• A major Midwest company is proposing to put a large
showroom/warehouse along the corridor, which would require an EIS.
• Large residential subdivisions in Hugo adjacent to the AUAR site area,
including Victor Gardens and Waters Edge, are under development or in
the planning stages.
• Washington and Anoka Counties, MnDOT, Lino Lakes, Centerville,
Hugo, Forest Lake and Columbus Township are working together to
define the transportation needs and seek federal and state funding for
transportation improvements in the 35E /CSAH 14 interchange area.
7
-70-
City of Lino Lakes - 35E Corridor
• Regional Infrastructure and 2020 Planned Land Use
Planned Land Use
Agricultural
Rural Residential
Single Family Residential
Multi - Family Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Mixed Use - Single Units
Multiple Uses - Several Units
Institutional
Park and Recreation
Open Space: Restricted Use
Open Water
Airports in the Regional System
Regional Parks
111/ds, Railroads, Trails
Railroads
- Principal Arterial
A Minor Augmentor
- A Minor Reliever
..— A Minor Expander
°�° -� A Minor Connector
- B Minor
Major Collector
Minor Collector
i- Regional Trails
Sewers, Transit
Sewer Interceptor Lift Stations
Gravity Sewer
Force Main Sewer
- Bus Routes
Bus Stops
P Park and Ride Lots
444 Metropolitan Council
-71-
0 1,0.,., x,000 3,000 4.000 5.000
CITY OF LINO LAKES
35E Corridor Site Detail
o 900 1,800
Feet
7
f /I
AUAR Boundary
Showroom Warehouse
Bench Mark Site
MLCCS
INE 10000 Artificial Surfaces and Associated Areas
1 20000 Planted or Cultivated Vegetation
RE 30000 Forests
� 4000D Woodland
*r=* *! ^t 50000 Shrubland
Vae 60000 Herbaceous
90000 Water
Coordinate System (ft)
Ramsey County, NAD 83
Source:City of City of Lino Lakes,
Ramsey County, and SEH.
•
AGENDA ITEM 6. C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
C. C. MEETING DATE: June 14, 2004
TOPIC: Second Reading, Ordinance No. 07 -04:
Vacation of Two Ponding and Flowage Easements
Oakwood View
Rice Creek Covenant Church
VOTES REQUIRED: 4/5
BACKGROUND
An easement vacation requires a public hearing at the City Council and two readings of
an ordinance. The City Council held the public hearing and approved the first reading of
Ord. 07 -04 at the May 24 meeting. This is the second reading.
Two "ponding and flowage" easements exist on the site. One is in the west central area
of the site, in the area planned for future parking for the church. The other is to the east
of the existing church building. The plan proposes to vacate both. The pond in the
second easement will be redesigned to allow for the new access driveway.
After approval tonight, the ordinance will be published June 22nd and become effective
after 30 days, as required by the city charter.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance 07 -04.
2. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 07-04
AN ORDINANCE VACATING TWO PONDING AND FLOWAGE EASEMENTS
ON THE SITE OF OAKWOOD VIEW AND THE RICE CREEK COVENANT
CHURCH, 125 ASH STREET
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1 Findings
The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application to vacate two
ponding and flowage easements:
1. The Rice Creek Covenant Church submitted an application to vacate two ponding and
flowage easements on the site to be platted as Oakwood View.
2. The easements are described in Attachment A.
3. Development plans for the Oakwood View plat provide for adequate stormwater
management for the site and the existing ponding and flowage easements are
therefore unnecessary.
4. The City Council held a public hearing on the proposed vacation on _date, 2004.
Section 3
The ponding and flowage easements described herein are hereby vacated.
Section 4
That any person, corporation or city owning or controlling easements contained upon the
property vacated reserves the right to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon
such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise
attend thereto.
Section 5
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 5 _ Lino Lakes Ordinance 07 -04, page 2
•
•
•
ATTACHMENT A, Lino Lakes Ordinance 07 -04
Easements To Vacate - Oakwood View
Easement One
Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3, Woodridge Estates, thence South
88 degrees 22 minutes 11 seconds East, an assumed bearing, with the south line of said
Lot 1 same being the north line of the tract out of which these easements are to be
granted, a distance of 84.05 feet; thence South 05 degrees 00 minutes 56 seconds West, a
distance of 793.09 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence South 24 degrees 28 minutes 21
seconds East, a distance of 44.03 feet; thence North 75 degrees 01 minutes 06 seconds
West, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence North 64 degrees 13 minutes 36 seconds West, a
distance of 40.30 feet; thence North 60 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance
of 52.28 feet; thence North 17 degrees 13 minutes 37 seconds East, a distance of 37.21
feet; thence North 36 degrees 56 minutes 52 seconds East, a distance of 40.84 feet;
thence South 65 degrees 15 minutes 12 seconds East, a distance of 17.00 feet; thence
South 34 degrees 16 minutes 42 seconds, East, a distance of 30.53 feet; thence South 32
degrees 17 minutes 06 seconds East, a distance of 23.67 feet; thence South 24 degrees 14
minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 28.97 feet, to the Point of Beginning.
Easement Two
Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3, Woodridge Estates, thence,
South 88 degrees 22 minutes 11 seconds East, and assumed bearing, with the south line
of said Lot 1 same being the north line of the tract out of which these easements are to be
granted, a distance of 84.05 feet; thence South 03 degrees 10 minutes 11 seconds East, a
distance of 1003.12 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence South 47 degrees 20 minutes
30 seconds East, a distance of 40.88 feet; thence South 54 degrees 50 minutes 28 seconds
East, a distance of 44.83 feet; thence South 35 degrees 03 minutes 26 seconds East, a
distance of 22.00 feet; thence South 30 degrees 59 minutes 37 seconds East, a distance of
18.02 feet; thence South 79 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 27.09 feet;
thence South 84 degrees 34 minutes 51 seconds West, a distance of 53.65 feet; thence
South 09 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence South 00
degrees 28 minutes 06 seconds East, a distance of 55.83 feet; thence South 11 degrees 34
minutes 32 seconds West, a distance of 21.32 feet; thence North 65 degrees 33 minutes
21 seconds West, a distance of 26.00 feet; thence North 48 degrees 17 minutes 18
seconds West, a distance of 43.74 feet; thence North 48 degrees 22 minutes 05 seconds
West, a distance of 37.15 feet; thence North 36 degrees 31 minutes 22 seconds East, a
distance of 27.63 feet; thence North 28 degrees 26 minutes 19 seconds West, a distance
of 18.21 feet; thence North 83 degrees 01 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 38.47
feet; thence North 47 degrees 22 minutes 44 seconds East, a distance of 26.94 feet;
thence North 29 degrees 20 minutes 01 seconds East, a distance of 37.00 feet; thence
North 03 degrees 53 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 31.50 feet; thence North 00
degrees 49 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 23.64 feet, to the Point of Beginning.
- 7 6 -
Lino Lakes Ordinance 07 -04, page 3
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
C. C. MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA ITEM 6D
James E. Studenski, City Engineer _
June 14, 2004
Public Hearing: Ordinance No. 09 -04
Vacation Of Drainage and Utility Easements,
Government Lot 6
Millers Crossroads
4/5
The Millers Crossroads Final Plat was approved by the City Council on January 14, 2004.
The original property included street, storm sewer, drainage and utility easements in the
southeast corner of the parcel. These underlying easements are no longer necessary
because the Millers Crossroads plat includes new easements and right -of -way that cover
this area. It is common and prudent to vacate the unnecessary underlying easements.
This avoids tangled title work in the future.
The easements to be vacated are Document Numbers 1352614 and 1360627. These
easements are being replaced by Outlot 0 and right -of -way from the Millers Crossroads
plat.
The city charter requires a public hearing and approval by ordinance to vacate city
easements. This is the first reading. If this first reading were approved, the second
reading would occur at the June 28th City Council meeting.
OPTIONS
1. Open public hearing, take comment, and close public hearing.
2. Approve the first reading of Ordinance 09 -04, vacating existing easements.
3. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Options 1 and 2
• CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 09-04
AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN STREET, STORM SEWER,
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS DOCUMENT NUMBERS 1352614
AND 1360627
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does hereby
ordain:
Section 1 The City Council makes the following findings:
1. That a public hearing was held on June 14, 2004 before the City Council after due
published and posted notice had been given
2. The City approved the final plat for Millers Crossroads with Resolution 03 -24..
3. Street, storm sewer, drainage and utility easements dedicated to the City with the
Millers Crossroads final plat are sufficient. The underlying easements are not
necessary.
4. It is in the best interest of the City to vacate these unnecessary easements.
Section 2 Any person, corporation or city owning or controlling easements
contained upon the property vacated reserves the right to continue maintaining the same
or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove
or otherwise attend thereto.
Section 3 The easements are described as follows:
All street, storm sewer, drainage and utility easements as shown on Document
Numbers 1352614 and 1360627 on file and of record in the office of the County
recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota
Section 4 The street, storm sewer, drainage and utility easements described in
Section 3 is hereby vacated.
Section 5 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days
following its passage and publication, in accordance with the City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2004
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
coo
1 1 I I g
1
M-
_51Ti Ti a , °'
avow. 7CVM 3r4n 3�
-avoa aaldM
1•
L
to
fiC
l to•LLflo
toi no
o•F�
ter
te r
H-LYYd ) VMS1PO
ms
J
•
f r
WI •
YT;;3O
QVON • bi Baal4.aseasos
ca
•
NOSCCOH r
_ h:oSOQOHL .
•
• • 1 , T
=�s e 1 F� 15°
-
Sz !� n -mi
5 CI
n= iii
ad SE `d' " 0E0,1
1
•
-79
EXHIBIT B
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
A perpetual easement for drainage, utility and storm water ponding purposes over, under
and across the south 170.00 feet of the east 210.00 feet of Government Lot 6, Section
30, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota.
Together with a temporary easement for construction trailers, staging and stockpiling
purposes over, under and across the east 133.00 feet of the south 315.00 feet of the
north 375.00 feet of said Government Lot 6.
Subject to the rights of the public for Ware Road and subject to Birch Street accordin to
ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY PLAT NO. 11. g
Total perpetual easement area = 35,700 square feet + / -..
Encumbered easement area = 5,610 square feet + / -.
Unencumbered easement area = 30,090 square feet + / -.
Total temporary easement area = 41,895 square feet + / -.
Encumbered easement area = 10,395 square feet + / -.
Unencumbered easement area = 31,500 square feet + / -.
Said temporary easement expires April 30, 1999.
Ware Road Project
Parcel 51
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
C. C. MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE:
AGENDA ITEM 6 E
Jeff Smyser
June 14, 2004
Resolution 04 -84: Denying Application for
• Comprehensive Plan Amendment
• Rezoning
• Allocation of MUSA Reserve
• Preliminary Plat
Fox Den Acres
3/5
BACKGROUND
Royal Oaks Realty has requested approval of single family residential development called Fox
Den Acres. The comprehensive plan guides the majority of the site for low density residential
use and it is zoned R -1. The request includes an amendment of the comprehensive plan,
rezoning, MUSA reserve allocation, and a preliminary plat. This would allow the development
to extend beyond the boundary of the area currently guided for development to provide for an
additional eight lots.
There are several challenging design issues including a "ponding and flowage" easement, single
access point due to past development designs, the growth management policies, and wetlands.
The City must consider these issues in the project design while acknowledging that most of the
property is guided and zoned for development, and has been for some years. There is usable
upland outside of the growth boundary and the applicant wishes to utilize this upland.
To accommodate the proposal, the following approvals are necessary:
1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment for areas outside current Low Density Sewered
Residential and Stage 1 growth areas
2. Rezoning of areas outside current R -1 zone, from Rural to R -1
3. Allocation of MUSA Reserve to areas outside current growth boundary
4. Preliminary Plat
ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning
The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the
area.
•
•
Fox Den Acres
page 2
Location
Existing Land Use
Guided Land Use
Existing
Zoning
Site *
vacant
40 acres: Low Density
Sewered Resid. and Low
Density Unsewered Resid*
40 acres: R -1,
outside the 40 is
Rural*
North
radio tower and other
communication facilities
Low Density Unsewered and
Sewered Residential
R -1
South
wetland
Low Density Unsewered Resid.
Rural
East
wetland
Low Density Unsewered Resid.
Rural
West
single family residential
Low Density Sewered Resid.
R -1
*The majority of the site, a 40 -acre square, is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential land
use (up to three units per acre), is within the stage 1 growth area (pre2010), and is zoned R -1.
However, the proposed plat extends beyond the growth area, MUSA, LDSR area, and R -1 zone.
Areas outside of the 40 acres is guided Low Density Unsewered Residential and is zoned Rural.
The following is a summary of the of the proposal's density:
Gross Site Area 50 acres
Upland Area 38 acres
Total Lots 64
Gross Density 1.28 units /acre
Net Density 1.68 units /acre
Growth Management:
MUSA Reserve: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy establish a
specific number of MUSA acres for residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). Most
of the site is within the current MUSA. However, the plat extends beyond the existing MUSA
on the east and south edges, so MUSA reserve allocation is needed for those areas.
On the southwest edge, approximately two acres of the house lots are outside the MUSA and
growth area (parts of Lots 9 -13, Block 4). On the eastem edge, about two acres of lots are
outside the MUSA and growth area (Lots 23 -27, Block 4). Therefore, about 4 -5 acres of MUSA
reserve would be needed. As shown in the table at the end of the report, MUSA allocation is
possible in 2005 without exceeding the annual goal.
Growth Management, Units/Year: The comprehensive plan and the growth management
policy establish a specific number of dwelling units of residential growth for stage one (prior to
year 2010). The goal is 147 per year. The City Council has the flexibility to exceed the limit by
20% (29 units) in a year without amending the comprehensive plan.
•
Fox Den Acres
page 3
The goal for 2004 has been exceeded and the additional 20% also has been used. This means
that additional new development cannot be final platted until 2005 and then would need the extra
20 %. This applies to this project.
As seen in the table at the end of this report, no more than 34 lots could be allowed for year 2005
if other applications proceed.. This is about half of the project.
Premature Subdivision Criteria: The subdivision ordinance is one of the City's official
controls designed to implement and support the policies in the comprehensive plan. Section
1002 -6 of the ordinance lists criteria for determining if a proposed development is premature.
These include consistency with the land use plan, including the staged growth area boundaries.
The applicant's position is that the growth area boundaries area likely were drawn to
approximate the developable area. There is usable upland beyond those mapped lines, and it is
reasonable to utilize the upland, which includes the area proposed for parkland.
The City currently is beginning a discussion of the comprehensive plan and the implementation
tools such as the growth management policy and the subdivision and zoning ordinances. With
the strict controls that currently are in place, it is difficult for staff to support development
beyond the mapped growth boundaries, particularly with the ponding and flowage easement that
is there and the City's desire for some greenway. These two issues are discussed further below.
Lots: The minimum lot size in an R -1 zone is 10,800 sf. Minimum lot width is 80', minimum
lot depth is 135'. All lots meet these requirements. As noted above, several lots are outside the
growth area and MUSA.
Streets, Access, Parking: Fox Road is the only access point for this site. Extending Fox Rd.
as proposed would exceed the maximum cul de sac length of 500' unless a future
outlet /connection is included. Wetland extends to the east and south for more than 1000'. There
is no possible additional connection on the west because the existing homes of Reshanau Lake
Estates South 4th Addn. (Hindsight shows that Deerwood Lane should have been designed to
provide a connection to the east at its southern end instead of curving west into a cul de sac.
This is no longer an option, however.)
The 500' radio tower on the north is likely to stay. The proposed road stub to the north of the
plat avoids the tower property. Land to the north of the stub does have on it several
communication facilities such as satellite dishes and the like, but nothing so imposing as the tall
tower. It seems possible that a road could extend to the north where pictured if these facilities
were removed in the future. That area includes upland, though it is impossible to know how
much without an actual delineation. A "ghost plat" of the area indicates there is the possibility of
fitting in a road and some lots.
The City typically does not allow islands in cul de sacs due to maintenance and plowing issues.
In addition, the northern road stub must accommodate a temporary cul de sac.
•
Fox Den Acres
page 4
Fox Road leads to Deerwood Lane and West Shadow Lake Drive. Both lead to Birch St.
Deerwood is a local street, West Shadow Lake Drive is a collector which runs from Birch St. to
6211d St., both of which are collectors.
Traffic: The developer submitted a traffic study. The original study did not recognize the
completion of West Shadow Lake Drive through to 62nd. St. or the reconstruction of 62nd St. The
study assumed all traffic from the new development will follow Deerwood Lane to Birch St.
The amended study takes into account the current and planned roadways. The result is that the
Birch St. approach and intersection will continue to operate at a level of service C.
Parks, Open Space: The proposal includes the dedication of 6.79 acres of parkland.
The current (1992) park plan does not anticipate a park in this location. The plan does envision a
"linear trail corridor" from the neighborhood on the west, across the northern part of the site, and
leading to Birch Park to the east. This trail was envisioned to be part of what we currently refer
to as a "greenway ". A greenway is a corridor of protected open space managed for conservation
and recreational purposes. The comprehensive plan includes a greenway map (see attached
detail). The City has no automatic ownership rights within areas envisioned as greenways.
Greenway corridors on the map are conceptual and are to be refined through the development
review process. The greenway map includes the entire project site within a greenway.
The City has begun the process to update the parks and trails plan. The new planning effort will
address open space that is not part of active use parks. The planning process will include
discussion on the different types of open space— active recreation parkland and passive space
with natural resource preservation goals —and how they do or don't fit into the community's
future. The goal is to complete that plan in 2004.
The 1992 park plan has not been implemented as envisioned, largely due to the lack of consensus
on how to accomplish its goals. The lack of consensus on how to achieve the greenway vision
laid out in the comprehensive plan is further manifestation of the need to address these concepts.
The intent of the new parks and open space planning effort is to resolve these issues.
We can say that it would be physically possible to retain some greenway along the south and east
edges of this site and make progress on the creation of a linear trail corridor. This could involve
cooperating with the developer and possible granting some flexibility on lot sizes and/or other
design elements.
The proposed plan substitutes the park (Parcel B). This would provide a possible connection to
the northeast.
The Park Board discussed the project at its May 3rd meeting and recommended only a cash
dedication. The subdivision ordinance includes park dedication requirements. Park dedication is
$1665 per residential unit. The Park Board's view was that the proposed park is marginal land
and can't be used for active park purposes.
•
Fox Den Acres
page 5
Utilities: Sanitary sewer and water service will connect to existing facilities in Fox Road.
As of May 6th, the analysis of the water system was pending to determine if pressure and
circulation are adequate for this development. If not, this project is premature.
Grading and Stormwater Management: Stormwater ponds will be created in several
locations on the site. There are unresolved questions regarding if the ponds will function as
proposed due to high water elevations relative to surrounding wetlands. This requires
geotechnical tests to determine ground water elevation. As of May 5th, we have not test data.
The drainage design along the western edge must not impact the existing homes. Several lots are
noted for "custom grading." However, we do need to ensure that the grading plan establishes
fundamental grading parameters in these areas. Further information must be supplied.
Drainage and utility easements will need to cover the ponds and stormwater facilities.
Easements also must be platted along all the external property lines.
The project requires the approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District. The District approved
the wetland delineation, but we have no documentation of further project approvals.
Existing City Easement: The project also proposes the partial vacation of an existing
ponding and flowage easement held by the City. This easement covers most of the land to the
east and south of the site, which comprises a large wetland area. A 100' strip (approx. one acre)
of the easement would need to be vacated on the eastern side of the plat. This also would include
triangle on the south (about 0.8 acre, within the 40 -acre area), and some narrow strips elsewhere
in the proposed plat.
This easement vacation is an issue because of the additional area proposed for development
outside the existing MUSA and growth area. The vacation of the flowage easement would be
necessary if the additional growth area is approved.
The City looks carefully at requests to vacate such easements. We require that the applicant
prove that the easement is not necessary and that the vacation will have no negative effect. The
only reason to vacate the portion of the easement on the east edge of the project would be to
provide for the additional lots outside the growth area and MUSA. On the south, lots can be
created within the growth area with the easement in place, though perhaps fewer of them. It does
not appear that the vacation is justified with the proposal as submitted.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
The Environmental Board reviewed this application on March 31St. Recommendations are
attached. The recommendations include pursuing a conservation development, with design
flexibility, to facilitate a greenway corridor along the south and east sides of the site.
•
•
•
Fox Den Acres
page 6
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
The P & Z held a public hearing and voted to deny the application at its May 12 meeting.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the project, including the four elements:
a. Comprehensive Plan Amendment
b. Rezoning
c. Allocation of MUSA Reserve
d. Preliminary Plat
2. Deny the project by approving Resolution 04 -84.
3. Return to staff with direction.
(The deadline for city action is July 9. This would allow only the June 28 city council
meeting for a final decision unless the applicant extends the review.)
RECOMMENDATION
Option 2
• The City's growth management policy and subdivision ordinance prohibit development
outside of defined growth boundaries. The proposed plat extends beyond the stage 1 (pre -
2010) growth area, the MUSA, the Low Density Sewered Residential land use area, and the
R -1 zone. The proposer requests amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning map to
accommodate the extra 3 -4 acres of development. It also would require the vacation of parts
of a ponding and flowage easement. There is no clear justification for these actions other
than to increase developable area.
• Section 1002 -6 of the subdivision ordinance lists criteria for detemlining if a proposed
development is premature. These include consistency with the land use plan, including the
staged growth area boundaries. A project that is inconsistent with these criteria is premature.
• We do not yet know if water service is adequate. If it isn't, the project is premature.
•
- 8 7 -
ti
r
r
r
O)
N
CA
N
CA
N °
ti
0)
T
O
N °
N-
g;
N
O
C J E N
M i. p O
O
N O 7g
P
O
LN
O
N
r
T
! 561
O
r
CO
N
N
r
r
r
'Cr
N
O
r
CY.)
T
CO
r
ty-
O
O
CO
CMD
O
M
M
m
CO
O
C)
in
O
T
2005
N
r
O
T'
18f
O
r
341-
N
CD
h
T
In
O
r
0
! 56
O
O
!`
r
d-
N
C9
ti
N
LC)
(9
LC)
T
O
O
r
CO
N
N
N
r
r
CO
'a,
S.•
10
U)
E
N a
L
0
co
r
O
249
r
0
56
O
CO
N
T
N
O
r
r
N
0
r
CO
r
CO
r
'C`
CID
N
approved prelim. plats
'Ravens Hollow
Haley Manor (10 new lots)
Crystal Cove
Millers Crossroads
Lakeview Estates (2 new)
C
O
w
O
C
G)
'Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th
proposed
Justin's Preserve I
Marshan Estates
Rice Creek Church duplex
Rice Church: Oakwood View
1Highland Meadows East 2nd
Pheasant Hills 12th island
!Rick Carlson /Rehbein lot
Fox Den Acres
!Junes Addn
O
- 8 7 -
ti
r
r
r
O)
N
CA
N
CA
N °
ti
0)
T
O
N °
N-
g;
N
O
•
1 TOTALI
O
I.0
N
I• O a) I� e} t� o
N 0 N cn n C t[y
r
r
CO
ti
O,
CS
O
M
remaining -7.0 0.0 20.4 30.6 26.6 36.0 36.0
2007 2008
O
O
p
O
CD
O
0)
2005 2006
co
(0
c)
'f'
L)
(0
O
CO
co
uo
co
r
M
.
O
O
uy
c0
co'
N
C
O
N
O
to
C'
r
r
O
O
N
ti
O
0
O
CO
RESIDENTIAL MUSA ALLOCATION 2003
co
CO
I--
N r
co
co
°'
tl'
annual target
IStoneybroolc
Century Farms North
Ravens Hollow
Justin's Preserve
'Junes Addition
West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addn
Fox Den Acres
To
O
O
r
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -84
RESOLUTION DENYING AN AMENDMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,
DENYING A REZONING, DENYING ALLOCATION OF MUSA RESERVE, AND
DENYING A PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOX DEN ACRES
WHEREAS, the City has received applications for developing an area known as Fox Den Acres; and
WHEREAS, the development requires approval of: an amendment to the comprehensive plan, a rezoning from
Rural to R -1 Single Family Residential, the allocation of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) reserve,
and a preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings:
1. A public hearing was conducted before the Planning & Zoning Board. The Board opened the public hearing
on April 14, 2004, continued it, and closed the hearing on May 12, 2004.
The City's growth management policy and subdivision ordinance prohibit development outside of defined
growth boundaries. The proposed plat extends beyond the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area, the MUSA, the
Low Density Sewered Residential land use area, as defined by the comprehensive plan. The project also
extends beyond the R -1 zone. The proposer requests amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning
map to accommodate the extra 3 -4 acres of development. It also would require the vacation of parts of a
ponding and flowage easement. There is no clear justification for these actions other than to increase
developable area.
••
3. Section 1002 -6 of the subdivision ordinance lists criteria for determining if a proposed development is
premature. These include consistency with the land use plan, including the staged growth area boundaries.
A project that is inconsistent with these criteria is premature.
4. We do not yet know if water service is adequate to serve the development. Without adequate service, the
project is premature.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby denies the application for
an amendment of the comprehensive plan to change land from Low Density Unsewered Residential to Low
Density Sewered Residential and to change the stage 1 growth area boundary.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council also denies the application for MUSA reserve allocation.
OE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council also denies the application for a zoning amendment to
change the zoning of land from Rural to R -1 Single Family Residential.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council also denies the application for a preliminary plat.
- 8 9 -
•
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2004.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
•
•
•
Memorandum
DATE: April 9, 2004
TO: Jeff Srnyser
FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
RE: Fox Den Acres
P(4:1)1
Attached is the TKDA review dated April 8, 2004, of the submitted documents for the
proposed development. The following comments must be addressed prior to final
approval given for this project.
Please contact me with any questions.
600 Town Center Parkway - 9 1 - akes, Minnesota 55014 -1182
Phnna• ArCI- QR ?- 1211111 • F,v• 1 O , ,,1O° . Tr,r- r_r, no-.
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
To: James E. Studenski, P.E.
Copies To:
From: Scott A. Brink, P.E.
Date: April 8, 2004
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292-4400
(651) 292 -0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
Reference: Engineering Review of
Fox Den Acres
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Owner/Developer:
Royal Oaks Realty
Comm. No. 12976 -002
A review for the above proposed development has been conducted, based upon the following:
1. Full -size and half -size Plan sets (six sheets) that include the following:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Certificate of Survey dated March 10, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc.).
Resource Inventory Survey dated March 10, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc.).
Preliminary Plat dated March 10, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc.).
Grading Plan dated March 10, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc and Plowe Engineering, Inc.).
Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan dated March 10, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc.).
Preliminary Utility Plan dated March 10, 2004 (Plowe Engineering, Inc.).
2. Storm Sewer Design Worksheet dated March 10, 2004.
3. Pipe Calculation Worksheet dated March 10, 2004.
4. Proposed Storm Drainage Area Map received March 11, 2004.
5. Wetland Delineation Report dated October, 2003 (Earth Science Associates, Inc.).
6. 2 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -year Drainage Calculations dated March 4, 2003 (Plowe Engineering, Inc.).
7. Proposed Site Drainage Area Map received March 11, 2004.
8. Existing Site Drainage Area Map received March 11, 2004.
9. Traffic Input Report for Fox Den Acres prepared by TDI (March 2004).
General
1. The proposed project area is located south of Birch Street and east of Deerwood Lane, at the east
termination point of Fox Road. The total property area is 50 acres. It is proposed to install streets,
sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer to serve 64 single family residential units.
2. Of the 50 acres, approximately 75% is upland or developable, while the remainder is pockets of .
wetlands scattered throughout the property or portions of DNR Wetland No. 565P, which borders the
south and east edge of the properties. According to the information provided, the Ordinary High
Water Level of the wetland is 893.0, and the Flood Zone limits have been indicated on the survey in
An Employee Owned Company I - 9 2 -Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
Engineering Review Page 2 April 8, 2004
Fox Den Acres
OCity of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
accordance with the local Flood Insurance Rate Map. A ponding and flowage easement in favor of
the City of Lino Lakes, corresponding roughly to the Flood Zone limits, is also indicated on the Plan.
A Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) will ultimately be required to perfoiiii the improvements as
proposed.
3. Ordinary and High Water Elevations for the remaining wetlands on the site have been provided. The
wetland sizes and water elevations vary throughout the site. The wetland boundaries were performed
by Earth Sciences in September 2003.
4. A Resource Inventory Survey has also been prepared for this site. The site is generally undulating
with mixtures of wooded areas, pasture, and wetlands. Soils are generally fine sands and fine sandy
loams with the exception of areas of muck in the vicinity of the lower flood plain areas. The soils
indicated are from the Soil Survey by the USDA Soil Conservation service. However, actual soil
borings, including groundwater elevations have not been provided.
5. MUSA Boundaries: A majority of the proposed subdivision is within the MUSA Boundaries.
However, Parcel B along with Lots 23, 24, 25, and 27 in Block 4 on the easterly side of the
subdivision are not within the MUSA service area. Thus, utility services can not be provided to these
four lots at this time based on current MUSA Boundaries. The Developer will need to discuss with
City Staff the implications of the MUSA restrictions. For example, the location of a temporary cul-
de -sac and/or other utility placement may be necessary.
Also, Parcel C along with portions of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 18 are outside the current MUSA
service area. The MCES staff will need to be consulted to determine if there are service restrictions in
these circumstances.
Grading and Drainage
1. A General Stormwater Discharge Permit, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), will be
required in accordance with the most current requirements of NPDES Phase II and State of
Minnesota regulations. All NPDES regulations and requirements in accordance with the MPCA shall
be adhered to, including submittal to the City of a Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
Sedimentation and Erosion Control must be enforced at all times during the course of all grading and
utility work. This includes the establishment of silt fence around all graded and disturbed areas, and
the sweeping of streets on a regular basis, and as directed by the City. In the event the Contractor
does not maintain erosion control as required, any costs incurred by the City as a result will be
withheld from escrows or other monies due. It is strongly suggested that a note be added to all
construction Plan sheets (including grading, streets, and utilities) reminding the Contractor to address
erosion control requirements be added to all grading and erosion control sheets.
The Grading Plan indicates that wetlands shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio per requirements of the
Wetland Conservation Act. At this time, it does not appear that any filling into the Flood Plain is
proposed. The Plans also must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). A permit
application has been submitted to RCWD (Permit No. 04 -039, dated March 12, 2004). RCWD has
determined the application to be Incomplete, pending the receipt of several additional items. All
requirements of the RCWD must be met.
Engineering Review Page 3 April 8, 2004
OFox Den Acres
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
4. Minimum grades and slopes must be provided and shown on the Plans as follows: 0.5% for streets
(including curb and gutter), and 2.0% for turfed/non -paved areas including all swales and slopes.
5. Proposed house pad information, including floor elevations are provided on the Plans, including the
City's requirements for floor elevations. The minimum lowest floor must be the greater of 2 feet
above the HWL, 4 feet above the NWL, 4 feet above the groundwater elevation, and 1 -foot above the
emergency overflow. The emergency overflow elevation and location is shown on some but not all
ponds. In addition, it appears that at least some of the units do not meet the minimum 4 feet
separation from the NWL. The emergency overflow information must be provided at all locations on
the Plan, and the proposed floor elevations shall be reviewed and adjusted as needed. The Grading
Plans shall specify that all house pads on filled areas shall be designed by a registered Professional
Engineer (per geotechnical recommendations) and approved by the City of Lino Lakes.
6. The submittal of a geotechnical and groundwater investigation and report is essential for determining
pond capacities and minimum low floor elevations. For example, the Ordinary High Water Elevations
of many of the existing wetlands are higher than the lower elevations of some of the proposed
NURP /detention ponds. This must be investigated further to assure that drainage will function as
required.
7. At Lot 17, Block 4, it is indicated that a future retaining wall will be needed. A wall location and
additional information to clarify must be provided.
8. On the Preliminary Plat, drainage and utility easements along all property lines shall be provided per
typical detail provided. In addition, drainage easements shall be provided around all wetland and
detention areas to cover the 100 -year levels and provide access for maintenance vehicles /equipment.
9. At least three of the lots are indicated as "custom graded ". Additional grading information shall be
submitted.
10. A Certified As -built Survey shall be provided by the Developer's Engineer upon completion of
grading, certifying that all grading complies with the Grading Plan. This Certification shall be
required prior to the issuance of any building permits. Final certification that the grading meets City
requirements for adequate drainage and minimum slopes will be required prior to the issuing of
building permits. Percent grades shall be shown on the Plan.
11. Storm Sewer System and Drainage Calculations:
a. Existing condition computations are acceptable. Proposed condition curve numbers and time of
concentration are acceptable. However, the discharge rates from the proposed 2 -, 10 -, and 100 -
year design rainfall events cannot exceed the existing conditions discharge rates. It is helpful to
provide a discharge rate comparison table with the revised discharge rate calculations.
b. The City Standard for storm sewer systems is the 5 -year rainfall event for this type of residential
development. However, a 10 -year design storm system will also be accepted.
c. Minimum stoim sewer pipe full velocity is 3 feet per second; 2.5 feet per second was used on the
submitted Plans and calculations.
Engineering Review Page 4 April 8, 2004
Fox Den Acres
• City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
' d. The following storm sewer structures do not have enough cover: 3, 4, 22, and 23.
Streets and Trails
1. Access to this property is proposed from only one location, from Fox Road just east of its intersection
with Deerwood Lane. This essentially results in a very large "cul -de -sac" or single point access for
the entire Development. The extension of Fox Road through the property considers further extension
to the north in the future. However, it is unknown at this time when and if such a second access into
the site would happen. Traffic levels of service, safety, and impacts to existing streets and
intersections shall be addressed to the City's satisfaction. Comments regarding the Traffic Study are
provided further in this report.
2. A park and trail loop are proposed in the northeast corner of the property (Parcel B). The City's
Comprehensive Plan provides for a regional trail linkage between Reshanau Lake Estates and Birch
Park in this area. It is recommended that provisions for the trail link be investigated further as part of
this Development.
3. The street layout as proposed on the Preliminary Plat appears to attempt to limit impacts to existing
wetlands. However, some filling of wetlands is proposed, and mitigation will be required. As
previously mentioned, the Plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the Rice Creek
Watershed District in accordance with the Wetland Conservation Act.
4. Further details regarding the streets and trails shall be provided on the Plans, including a typical street
section, pavement section required, street widths, radii, type of curb, etc., all in accordance with City
of Lino Lakes standards. As mentioned in comments under Utilities, a Detail Sheet that includes all
applicable City standard plates and additional requirements of the City must be provided.
5 "Islands" are shown in the center of the proposed cul -de -sacs. Such islands shall be permitted only if
allowed by the City. Construction details (turf, landscaping, etc.), and long term maintenance
responsibilities shall be addressed by the Developer with the City.
6. The cul -de -sac at the north end of the subdivision on Fox Road is not drawn per City engineering
standards (92' diameter). However, it is recognized that this cul -de -sac may be considered
temporary, pending extension of Fox Road to the north at a later date. The cul -de -sac as proposed
may therefore be considered acceptable. In addition, as previously mentioned, a temporary cul -de-
sac at the end of Fox Hollow may be appropriate since the properties (Lots 23 -27) are outside of the
MUSA boundary.
Utility Plan
1. It is proposed to connect sanitary sewer to an existing 10 -inch sanitary sewer stub that extends
easterly from the intersection of Fox Road and Deerwood Drive. The rim elevation for MH 18
appears to be incorrect.
Engineering Review Page 5 April 8, 2004
eFox Den Acres
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
•
2. It is proposed to connect 8 -inch watermain pipe from an existing stub extending from the intersection
of Deerwood Drive and Fox Road. However, records indicate that this stub may be 6 -inch. The size
of the existing stub must therefore be confirmed. Adequate water pressure and circulation into the
proposed Development shall be verified by the Developer, as there is no loop or secondary feed
available to serve the Development.
3. Notes addressing private utilities, and erosion and sedimentation control must be provided on the
Utility Plan.
4. A note shall be provided on the Utility Plan stating that utility installations shall meet the
requirements of the Standard Specifications of the City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM)
and the City of Lino Lakes.
5. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed Minnesota
Department of Health (MDH) Permit for watermain installation and MPCA/MCES Sanitary Sewer
Permit, upon completion of the Utility Plans and prior to construction.
6. Information shall be provided on the Plans showing the location of individual services for sanitary
sewer and water, including stationing and elevations.
7. The Developer shall provide a televised inspection tape of all sanitary sewer pipes upon completion
of the roadway and utilities. Any subsequent cleaning of the sewer pipes after construction shall be
the responsibility of the Developer.
8. The number and location of all hydrants and gate valves shall be subject to the review and approval
of the City Fire Chief.
9. Trench and roadway compaction shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, including
100% of Standard Proctor Density for the upper three feet directly beneath the roadway, and 95% of
Standard Proctor from utility encasement zone to three feet below the surface. As stated in previous
reviews, it is critical that geotechnical information and direction be followed as construction activities
progresses. It is recommended that a geotechnical investigation be conducted, and that a geotechnical
consultant be utilized throughout construction.
10. The Utility Plan is incomplete with regards to storm sewer infoimation, including pipe sizes,
materials, slopes, structure elevations and inverts, etc.
Details
A Detail Sheet must be provided that includes all applicable City of Lino Lakes standard plates. Additional
information shall also be included on the Utility Plans and/or the Detail Sheet as follows: Gate Valves shall
be Mueller A- 2370 -20 with mechanical joints, meeting AWWA Specifications C500 -61. Valve Boxes shall
be Mueller H -10357 with H -10361 drop lid, and extensions shall be Mueller H- 10363. Hydrants shall be
• Waterous Pacer WB -67 with a bury depth of 8' - 6 ". Services shall be Type "K" copper with Mueller H-
15000 corp stop. Curb stop and curb box shall be Mueller H -15154 Mark 2 oraseal, and Mueller H -1300
w/Mpls. Top. Storm sewer details and standard plates (including structures and outlets) shall also be
provided.
Engineering Review Page 6 April 8, 2004
•Fax Den Acres
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Traffic
A Traffic Report for Fox Den Acres has been prepared by TDI, March 2004. Because the majority of
generated traffic is expected to access to and from County Road 10 (Birch Street), the report essentially
addresses expected impacts to Deerwood Lane, and the intersection of Deerwood Lane with County Road
10. However, the report does not address the impact of the smaller percentage of traffic that will utilize other
routes, particularly Fox Road to the newly completed West Shadow Lake Drive and soon to be completed
62nd Street. Although the traffic volumes in this direction are expected to be relatively minor, it is
recommended that the report still address potential impacts.
Regarding the intersection of County Road 10 and Deerwood Lane, the report states that the Level of Service
(LOS) of the Deerwood Lane northbound approach will ultimately (year 2009) operate at a LOS D under the
build scenario. Table 2 in the report states that the same approach lane currently operates at LOS C and will
continue to operate at LOS C under the year 2009 no -build scenario.
As a result, it is recommended that additional work on the Traffic Report be conducted to address the
following:
1. Impact resulting from generated traffic utilizing access to and from the southwest.
2. Level of Service changes at the intersection of Deerwood Lane and Birch Street resulting from Fox
Den Acres, and assessment of any specific improvements that may be needed as a result.
Other Issues
In accordance with City requirements, a Landscaping Plan shall be submitted. The Tree Preservation Plan
shall be subject to further review and approval of the City.
•
IIem�
To: Jeff Smyser
• CC: Michael Grochala
From Marty Asleson
Date: April 7, 2004 . .
Re: :Recommendations of the March 28, 2004 Environmental Board .:
Environmental
•
The Environmental: Board met on March 28, 2004 and made the following
recommendations:
•
Junes Subdivision:
• ' The North and West Edge of the property abutting the wetland should be planted
with a native City Specification Native plant mix. ;
• . There should be no importing or exporting of soils without City approval..
Applicant should demonstrate' there is an adequate separation between the
`:.. bottom of the proposed pond and the seasonally high water table:'.
• RC1ND issues should be resolved.
Request the applicant plat as park or provide. a 'conservation easement for the
remaining wetland areas on the plat.. (This is in a proposed greenway area and
adjacentto City owned parkland).
Motion by O'Connell, 27i by Bauman. Motion to recommend approval with staff and
''Environmental Board suggestions; otherwise recommend denial. All approved.
West Shadow. Ponds 2 "d Addition
Parcel developer Mr. Richard Carlson tabled this item for having more time to set up
:a conservation easement with Rice Creek watershed.
Fox Den. Acres
The Environmental Board recommended that this plat be denied under the
current zoning, that this would be an excellent property to develop with a
greenway corridor. (If approved than other considerations of Environmental Board
and Staff should be looked at).
The following recommendations were made::
• Recommend this development be considered as a PUD and /or Conservation
Development that would allow for variability in lot sizes and street widths.
• ` Suggest that the developer work with the Saddle Club site, or look at purchasing.
the Saddle Club site, for developing together with the Fox De n Acres site, so that
the two sites could be planned concurrently.
•
That the proposed NURP ponds and infiltration ponds be evaluated for adequate
separation and filtration to the seasonally high water table.
That the developer works with staff to identify trees that can be saved in buffer
areas and designated clear areas..
That the development should allow for the creation of a greenway corridor from
the South West comer to the South East corner, and up along the East side of
the property.
No soils should be imported or exported without City approval.
Soil protection areas should be designated and fenced off.
Rock entrances should have additional stockpile of rock on hand to top dress
entrances when initial rock entrance fills up.
Storm water from roofs and back yards should follow some sort of a designed
treatment train before water flows into existing wetlands.
The developer should be required to use the City native seed mix, in NURP and
infiltration . pond . restoration -work. That the seeding of these areas be
accomplished with the services of an approved contractor that is knowledgeable
in native plant restoration. That the developer be required to hire such a native
plant contractor to manage the restoration areas fora minimum of three years.
•Page 2
-99-
REVISED JAN.
REV. MAY
REV. AUG.
REV. FEB.
REV. FEB.
REV. FEB.
REV. MAY
1967
198E
1989
1991
1992
1993
1994.
REVISED :NOV. 1994
REV. JAN.1996
REV, JULY 1997
REV. . JULY 199B
REV. • AUG. 1999
REV. • SEPT. 2000.
REV. . MAY 2001
SHADED AREA DENOTES „
PARK "LOCATION
MAf
CITIFY
rr
•
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL)
LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
•
•
Low Density
Sewered
Residential
Low Density Unsewered
Residential
ZONING MAP DETAIL
-102-
•
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN WITH GREENWAYS (DETAIL)
LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
-104-
It ...A pa• anon
.1
1I
-
21g \.\\
P ;
IL
i•it\
1— 0 , .
• .,
• o
• c' 5,b
',....y„t) • . • Q Q
• . . • . •
1 i
• . •
fi
t.) -
1YR
4 c'
n.
•
4.;
r ......, ..---V--: --7 :---: • ; . ,,, --.\'''l i
.... . .
1•14-C,,-;.• • ' ' • '....:‘, ': ,,: ' ,
.--:-.:+).:..:,,..
•IL: d=tE ,k,}. . il,
).' Ur '''',V
21- ix,,f-"A s.
,-,
...
rsr7,7T\ ILI'L4(4,---`
' : ..- . '411i: . ' '. I. J. 'Pia'. \ - •
: •
) V4,;",:: N.:%1.....' VZ__1‘,/7/!;77‘ — --ii•Itaf
11 " : ..- :-:1■.-::i'' : : : • :1 ..,...lt *0: .,. i.
• ''%
I
L
s
1
10
1 • ).v.' • • : • e . • •"-..
' • : • • •
0,
OQ
trOL6
\ /.5,275,t15.00N
Vi„1:i4t '5 -5
, • 4 1')
4
V
.._Z .._ .. --;• 5.'—,,. :, . • ,-.k:r.i1‘p*'.t! ...:.. .,..E, 2.., .,. .— -u. , r-,1t5v-- .4 F .-..5.-: ,. . - : -7 -: .- .,:7f: :. . -,. ,-‘5r. , ,... ., - ' ' .r, . 5 -,
:..r , -/ - k -7 " - ' 1 : A - . . _ . . n .k .... • , - .. ,. t , .c, -, A *.' ' \ 1` : I
U .' X-:,1 , .;,. ,tt.1t.■ . _
•R7:I.■ :4 t .! , -
-.•• • • :.:
. •
E3.
R '';* 1
• , • . •';
: • 1 •
• :
N
1
• •
' : 4:7
`‘,.•:47
IN= a.tt rs
IT z vzsZ
-.21,09.00
—
II!
n
i;
It!
1
r.et
atalgai;
g
if
L5 6i9T
3,35.2C.DOS
•
•• •
1111110
•
, • ' . • . •
••
• ' VI zci
. • ; :
• • :
-11'-'gi■Ot
hr4101/214;1W1 11112M1
- 106 -
ON
fr-
La 6Cala
1.1LBC.005
\
a 2
g.1
I
114
NE Zig ;all
;31:4.1131!:
, t
'14,1
*•:\ \
'• • • ••• • .
111111111
ij
t.tir
to
41141112 lAtii.
•
( •••■ s? I 1\ I1(
I j
\
\ •
\ •
••••.••••7,„
rtittLii
.a
• : •
q.1,0
•• •
. • • s •,;',<`77
• •
111.1.tin )
4'
. • . •
yr-'7•
*.r:‹1:••• A •.'"
• \
k„. . . i ...\ .... ..... •
. \ •..,:1' A`:.":...sts,.
i ., ...
' tr., .. Vi,' ,S.:... • ./.., ' .
71,
00
0, 00.0.0
, A
ann000naano
antra 000117.
.conMIMIL,
C.) w
w
1.22
Ca
Ca77
4-7.J
•a•-
1-1
-107
8 I
1
. . • , 7 • • •
• •
, . •
• . • . • • . •
Q
9
• di
o o 'a E • - -
, Q
!LI.;
c/2"2e
.,9
AfS
„‘ •
L6S•r9Z
3.12.2.135
I
'Ja
•
•j
11;1:
tr
1111118
\
-1 V
I
d ^SP:M..oDA, 'If
M.[L.Pl OON ". �'
4T'1LCl '�,
1
ZRx44#=✓
L
•
a1w•1 eeertauo
amyl ccemmo
5
7
—109 —
0
•
RECUVEU
MAR 11 200$
or( Or S.it40 LAKES S
-1I0-
•
AGENDA ITEM 6F
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 14, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -80, Approving Plans and Specifications and
Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for the Marshan Lane Utility
Improvements Project.
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The plans and specifications for the Marshan Lane Utility Improvement project
were ordered by the City Council. City utilities will service the new Marshan
Estates subdivision and all Marshan Lane residents. Preparation of the plans is
substantially complete, including reviews by the Rice Creek Watershed District,
and Anoka County. City staff has prepared the plans and specifications for this
work and is requesting Council approval to advertise for bids. The project
schedule is as follows:
June 14, 2004
July 8, 2004
July 12, 2004
October, 2004
Approve Plans and Authorize Advertisement for Bids
Open Bids
Consider Award of Contract
Substantial Completion of Construction
The project cost for the Marshan Lane Utility Improvement project is
$245,000.00. The funding for this project will be through assessments to the
benefiting properties and Trunk Funds.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -80, approving plans and specifications and
authorizing advertisement for bids for Marshan Lane Utility Improvement
Project.
3. Not adopt Resolution Number 04 -80.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 04 -80 be adopted.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -80
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS— MARSHAN LANE UTILITY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for
Marshan Lane Utility Improvement project, and has presented such plans and
specifications to the Council for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and
in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications, The
advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk until 10:00 a.m. on
Thursday, July 8,2004, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City
Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be
considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, July 12, 2004, in the
Council Chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is
questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to
address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered
unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5)
percent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of June, 2004.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
L
. ---
m_m88e.
H
an
n8
- -10
WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION
_.- RED ------- - - -._. -
77.1 E
�� i
PIPE MINES - AU. SIZES
O' GATE VALVE ON DIP
•
I2' GATE VALVE ON DIP
V CORP. COCK /CURB STOP AND DO%
I. COPPER SENICE PIPE
JJ Eg-dg,
t U .g
rio-ts.,
h— n n
n e _
REMOVALS AND RESTORATION
REI
IAODIIIIAIIWI
TRAFFIC CONTROL
CIE/DING AND CRUOOOIG
SALVAGE SIGNS MO WJLDOX SUPPORTS
REMOVE CURD 111D CUTTER - -- _-
SALVAGE CATCH &15111
REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY (ALL INICKNESSE5)
rf
ra
r
G
i
$ _
o
ng
E
URUMINOUS PAVEMENT (STREET)
CONCRETE CURD TRIO GUTTER
O' CONCRETE ORNEWAY PAVEMENT - - - -- - -
ITRUMDIOUS URNEWAY PATCH
i
9
L
WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION
_.- RED ------- - - -._. -
77.1 E
�� i
PIPE MINES - AU. SIZES
O' GATE VALVE ON DIP
•
I2' GATE VALVE ON DIP
V CORP. COCK /CURB STOP AND DO%
I. COPPER SENICE PIPE
JJ Eg-dg,
t U .g
rio-ts.,
h— n n
n e _
gr.
. S
8L1 qzq o 74 _ �n
..g .ie W NA E5 C C =da - W
< � 4vC� jy yyCC
=CWmfpl �U WSW 2 di ni5 yyl!..
3 O UGpO; �C 522f! V1 g{,i zw ° OW 2( G �m �° 2C
y� p �fu z2 >� 22¢22¢ <4 �++ z W •
V rari VW`p�j pOp C« m -W0U' V ID Fm NU 375 Zi ? ON
C4UUWwVld arc- �3¢m�riiN�[�3k�m��`o
thc %Gv�t7;g g%i`ti%�u`,- 1,-;g-;g - 9eg>a+gW 6 g gii°g
Zp ri1WWW5i15 66 55 5 55 5ZSjS� 5�7x 45mG7m�mc'�'¢ C ccec¢
HIIH
1111 II II 11 l i 1 1
_ .
�i�l o., Il.p TI °
H Ily i II k I II . II 1 I 1 1111
ilI 1 I 0
_ill��' 1
uo
co
ro
a
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
6
2
2
mn.mmnm
as -
- 114 -<
0'°
I IMO I.AKFS
SAM TT PAUL. M11111.O1A
310 .dGYd
it
Rg33B
5gG
514
WATER SERVICE DETAIL
4
i
N
H
W
IJINMFC(TTA
ENGINEERS • ARCI IITECTS • PLANNERS
-115-
-116-
066
oaE
m8
sip
e <eo
`bam�
:1166
•
TEMPORARY MAILBOX
h
W
Z
Z
F3
z
W
> LU
<C
<
O �
z
U
2 SOo 7c'-- 9n4
w ^�g a_z
EDGE OF BG.. PAV�dENT
¢. U > O 3• ,2 J 5 f N
il
0
0 al-'WW; W
G G ti� ¢'Q C
E
0
0
/
/
/
/
/
/
QP
0
zr-
•
/1
e'
0
0
N,
0
En
IQi
6g
:
z=
z
N
MINNESOTA
UNO LAKES
d
0
5
0
5
W
F
U
z
W
0
O
W
Li
z
0
v
0
z
G
tiG
t 'J.M 3>i — 117 -
G
O O O
rn a 01
0
m
O
m
gg I
9 N
c c
tf,d4
-
flhII1IllhIIllliuiiLiuuuwiiiillhIljjij!ffllhiiij1iiiiiiillhiii1ijii
IllhIflIlluhJIIllMllillfflll
111
1
10005:
•
1. MI WANE 5ERVIC00 SHALL OE 1- TI PE K COPPER J. WATT di SANITARY SEWER SERVICES 5110101 MI 111E O. 0151X11011
W/ CURB 000 & STOP P(0 CITY OF 11110 WIE5 PW15 ATE APPROXIMATE. TIE ENGINEER SIMI. FOR ALL MAINS .
STANDARDS UNLESS INDICATE OTHERWISE 041 111E OEIENMIIIE 111E FIRM. LOCATION FOR FACI1 PARCEL (SMEARY SEWER Al
flM1N5. 005(0 ON 110ME0W11ER INPUT RIO CRY REQUIREMENTS 4,0 FEET OF 0441810
2. ALL SAIIIfMY SERER SERVICES SHALL 0E f PVC 4. ALL WORK W10101 TIE RICIIf -OF -WAY OF LAKE (RIVE BE ATTAINED.
5CA1 40 PER CRY OF LINO LAKES 51015530S SHALL CONFORM 10 111E REQUIREMENTS OF AA101fA
UNLESS 11101001(0 0111 (0WLSE 011 111E PLANS.
•
g
o
.✓,SRI
°
L
-
Nle
"._
=' ,
$ ,
.F •.. 9 /
`� �
4
i::
Illitsiol
M 1
Iill1 r
flMIllIM�
1
111
IN
Lake Dr. & Morahan Lane
PROPOSED UTIUIIES
SNFFT Nn 6 nF 6 CLIFFTC
�
/O— ppI
_
_
f=iruMuIflllJ1
V''
- te-,ol�
r
-�
+
JHI
11
EMU
ENIEMMIIIII0I
MARSHAN LANE
SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN
IMPROVEMENTS
HMO 1 Al/FR UINAIFCnTA
0\
° a��0 0 o
MitillIII�1111O1IIIIIIIiI��
1
11 4
�
�)
f � ��
- .. �1
'
m
I
L_
m .;
of �o \ \\
L,o M N \ \,f
�I
11
HEN
111110111
IJ�III��II��I
ION
5 6 7 5 9 10
1 oma JJ
I
�
•
�'
5 II
I IIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIl�I0l�lllll�llllll�
Qlll�liIIlll1lDlN�l�ll(II�
11101111
0
P IMMO1110
�.
=
io
!'
J \
.1 �I
r
DI1•11111111
0llliNINE
,T.
1 tea.
- W 1
�
6�
3I
3W '�
,I N
'6
� �'
G
11II���NIIIII�IIII�II�IDE
llllIuIllhJI!fJIifflLiiiIIllIlluhIllhIllUIIfflflflIflfl(�Ioe
_ k i m
f 400
-- r
k, t
�
- �
MEI
`�°
7g • IFmfflIrnfffl�ffuJflflInulliflhInfliflimuJjjfiujffJijmffi
' N -
fflJfluIJIIIllllllllJfflllll�jIJftIJIJflhIll]flJlluJftl
[IliIlllllllluIMlluhIllllhiiiiiiiillhliIllhiIlIIhuilllhImfflIuiuIIfflhIII
II�III�wig
II11�IlilfllluummIl
El
l
�
�k
�lllillllllllll
�� ac
SaE Ua��f -Jy 1
��:— - s
11111
as
4 B_
k �g
jii
I ,.....,
1
01
TO EMST. STIR SAN. SEWER did -
CROSS DIP WATERMANN a ROW
LAKE DRIVE (HWY. 49) i
1 li I - . . .
111
I
iL .„
`;
.
i6
��`�'
1_,) _
)♦
��
'
�OF$5L
: 7 * --
� � __
`
'
��Illlll�llllidUMW
II(Ill�ll�l(I�Illl
I�IflII�NH
I�II�f
�I111
�I�10 ii
IIII I�
NOM
I
` -ids /�
��____� 1
ri
-
_ N N
� 4�
8
I� �
in
0
--�
1
� I
-gym ;
xgcN 1
I
L J
IIIIIIflu1llOflIL�IllhE
®II�IIII�IIII10111��1�
IINIIIIII�IIMMIIO
IIIP
.�,
g _ y
NOt!IIIIIInIIuImJ4MflhII1IllffIIllIllHIfflftMllMhI
ON
b $,-�
. `�
;
iEIfluIllIllIJllMLIDu111I1RIllll
1111�
3MQL
:
• = _
_
EIIIIIIJ1
8 - I
O1
�AhWbd
AGENDA ITEM 6G
• STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 14, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -81, Rejecting All Bids and Authorize Re- Bidding,
Birch /Hodgson Street Improvements Project
•
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required
BACKGROUND:
Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on June 3, 2004. The
results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award
a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
Contractor Amount of Bid
Arnt Construction Co., Inc. $ 677,698.79
Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. $ 688,682.92
Magnum Company LLC $ 747,500.23
Engineer's Estimate $ 560,078.10
The low bid is approximately 21% over the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy
of the complete bid tabulation is attached. The overrun in project costs appears to be
contributed to the issues of maintaining traffic during the project work while meeting
Anoka County design requirements, the traffic control signal system, and the trail
system.
According to the City Charter, if bids exceed the estimated cost by the engineer by
more than 10 %, the City may not award the contract but may rebid the project one time
only.
It is staffs recommendation to review the design requirements with Anoka County
including their funding of the project and make the appropriate adjustments. The
project would then be rebid. Depending on the review with Anoka County, an estimated
substantial completion date for this project would be October 30, 2004, with a final
completion date of November 15, 2004.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -81, Rejecting All Bids for the Birch /Hodgson Street
Improvements project.
3. Not adopt Resolution No. 04 -81.
RECOMMENDATION:
• Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 04 -81.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -81
RESOLUTION REJECTING ALL BIDS AND AUTHORIZE RE- BIDDING — BIRCH /HODGSON
STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the Birch /Hodgson
Street Improvements project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and
the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Contractor Amount of Bid
Arnt Construction Co., Inc. $ 677,698.79
Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. $ 688,682.92
Magnum Company LLC $ 747,500.23
Engineer's Estimate $ 560,078.10
AND WHEREAS, according to City Charter, the City can not award a contract that exceeds the
engineer's estimate by more than 10 %;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to reject all bids for the construction of the
Birch /Hodgson Street Improvements project according to the plans and specifications
approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the
Construction Bulletin an advertisement for re -bid for the making of such improvement under
such approved plans and specifications.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of June 2004.
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
•
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
TKDA
ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
June 7, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Re: Birch Street and Hodgson Road Improvements
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
TKDA Commission No. 12993 -01
Dear Mayor and City Council:
1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292-4400
(651) 292 -0083 Fax
www.tkda,com
Bids for the referenced project were received on June 3, 2004, with the following results. A
complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your infoimation.
Contractor
Arnt Construction, Inc.
Forest Lake Contracting, Inc.
Magnum Company, LLC
Base Bid
$677,698.79
$688,682.92
$747,500.23
Engineer's Estimate $560,078.10
Recommendation
Based on the City Charter, any project receiving bids in excess of 10% over the Engineer's
Estimate must be rejected. Therefore, we recommend that the City Attorney review the bids and
make a recommendation to the City.
Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely,
Scott A. Brink, P.E.
Project Manager
• SAB:art
Enclosure
An Employee Owned Company Pn - 1 2 1 -native Action and Equal Opportunity
cn
w
Z • J
z 0 ¢
WZDC
G Y
/� JZ ~`<
H _ W• U
CC Q
OZ�
0 2u
1,
W Una
0
EMI I Et
LU
Z
00
U i-
Z
z0
cc 7-
0
cc
¢ _
Z
0-
U
c
Z ..
w
M
w
> z
O • - O
a 5
M
0 0 o
U) . o¢ n cc cc
J
1- V
Z O
. ¢ (1)
CO 0 C13 CC
W
LLB 0 Z r 0 0
o Z 9 N
1 - c C~i m
DWr w z
TABULATI
Z CC
- -¢-1 Z 0
F
wz0 WW w
I- JCA W Cn
C 4 CL CA d iw-
TOg 0 o
CC HO 0 Ili
[D U U m
wJ
�
O
w
0)
11
w
w
Z�
ZZ
w�
Z
0
a_
11
U
0)
W
0
WO
n. in
t9 64 49 69 49 63 63 64 E9 69 43 E9 64 69 63 63 64 63 49
00, O 0000 000 00 00 00 00 = 00000
0 0 0 0 0 oo 00 0o oo
o 6 �o .-0 0 o(c o- dmodo
o N co r co. o {: CO. cCD D o O CA 0 0 0 CO m T N
(� a- CO 03 Cli t- rn
49 d3 64 64 ffl 49 63 49 69 E9 -- 69 49 69 64 43 64 49 49 49
-= 00 00 0 0 0 =- 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
00000000 0 0 0 0 0
Lii CV C*) CV O Cr) O r O
0 T C7 Ih G I� C- e7 O N
�7 CO r •r 0 r r CO Cr) C7
co
-' -" 64 49 44 -- -- E9 E9 49 69 63 49 64 63 49 63 Ea 49 E9 E9 49 63 64
CC I3EE
-) C4 W J 0 } 0 i- LL D H
UU U U-)2
CU r ti CO O CO CO
CDON - NT r 0CD CO CCO r CO *)� rCj Cp(O r � 00N
w
C
CO
a a
0 >
z U
a
(..) 1 0
co
0 I li
F-O CD it. Ili CC
¢s z
JQmO O Ow
CO W = M
MU U' Q COcwn
+" N CO tt) CD N CO CO • r r T r CO T N N N CO N N no ni -..
00 0
0 1
1 $ 1,980.00
00 $
$ 1,075.00
1 $ 504.00
00 0
00 $
$ 5,244.00
$ 2.500.00
1 $ 11.048.00
1 $ 525.00
oo $
$ 925.00
1 $ 1.525.00
00 000000
CO I
oo
(O N
0 1
1 $ 23,100.00
$ 500.00
$ 750.00
O 0
0 $
$ 51,408.00
$ 75.978.00
0 o
o O
O
0 $
$ 150.00
0 0
0 1
1 $ 2.50
$ 9.00
0 $
$ 1.75
$ 4.00
$ 500.00
°o °
°o o
o° I
I $ 25.00
= $
$ 500.00
$ 500.00
- -
- =
= o
o° °
°o °
°o °o $
$ 12.00
°o
$ 42.00
$ 42.00
$ 42.00
$ 42.00
$ 56.00
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 $ 220.00
0
1 $ 896.00
$ 250.00
0 $
$ 5,244.00
$ 1,600.00
1$ 55.24
1 $ 1,050.00
O 1
O C
1 $ 1,952.00
I$ 1,740.00
$ 890.00
CD
N O
O I
CV r
r c
I$ 500.00
$ 850.00
0
0
$ 51,714.001
O O
O o
o
$ 18,468.00
0000 1
1 $ 40.00
000000,00, L
- - N
N r
LC $
$ 4.00
$ 320.00
C7 �
00'00L'£ $
1 $ 26.00
0 $
$ 580.00
$ 890.00
(m*) C
CO C
CO 0
0000 $
$ 11.52
0
$ 42.25
$ 42.25
$ 42.00 1
$ 42.00
$ 57.00
$ 4,800.00
$ 4,290.00
I $_ _ _ 110.00
1 $ 1,290.00
$ 13,256.00
I $ 16,572.00
I $ 1,220.00
$ 52,759.00
00'0017'8 $
00'085'99 $
$ 12,353.00
$ 61,506.00 I
$ 1.00
$ 400.00
$ 1,550.00
$ 18.00
$ 20.00
$ 100.00
$ 130.00
$ 34.00 I-
$ 30.00
LF
LF
EA
SY
EA
LS
LF 1
CY t
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
1 55
1 430
5524
840 I
100
5
6,050
1,224
230
253
324
(BIRCH STREET AND HODGSON ROAD STREET IMPROVEII
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB
REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES & SIZES)
HEMUVE 1311 SUHI-ACE - S 1 REET /DWY/TRAIUSHOULDER
(ALL DEPTHS)
MILL 2" BITUMINOUS - STREET
1: N ALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX SUPPORT
(SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 12" PIPE SEWER CMP
SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 15" RCP
(SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 15" FES (RCP)
SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 24" FES (RCP)
COMMON EXCAVATION (P) (STREET /DRIVEWAY)
COMMON EXCAVATION (P) FOR TRAIL
TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)
CRUSHED ROCK -6" DEPTH (TRENCH STABILIZATION)
EXPLORATORY DIGGING
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED) (STREET,
DRIVEWAY)
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED) FOR TRAIL
TYPE MV AGG. 3 WEARING COURSE (C.S.A.H. 10, C.S.A.H.
19)
TYPE MV AGG. 3 NON - WEARING COURSE ( C.S.A.H. 10,
..S.A.H. 49)
TYPE LV AGG. 3 WEARING COURSE (WARE RD)
TYPE LV AGG. 3 NON - WEARING COURSE (WARE RD,
;OMMERCIAL DWYS)
YPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE 2" THICK FOR TRAIL
0
cc
d
0
O
• Q
ON
CO W
LL t3Z
O • z o
Od• a)
zwr
F- • � Z
CC
N ▪ LL
U 0
¢I'0.
E UU
TAB
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS
BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2004, AT 10:00 AM
*DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION
DESCRIPTION
w Z •
0
o
o
N
63
1 $ 1,540.00
0 0 0
o00
N 000
r d'
Eft 64 64
$ 2,268.00
$ 984.00
0
00
On
CO
E9
0
69
$ 750.00
0
00
00
64
$ 300.00
$ 1,200.00
O
0
Qom),
r
64
$ 600.00
o
in
n
69.
O
o
0
N
69.
$ 1,300.00
$ 1,300.00
00
'0d'
fA
N
64
$ 4,554.00
00 0
0f17
00
0 0
E9 69
$ 525.00 1
00
000
000
C:
E9
00
T
ES
00
LC)
69
100'000'Z $
$ 580.00
$ 1,500.001
0
0000
CO'
0
64
0
NhtA
69.
ON
r
49
0
r
EA
$ 628.20 1_
00
0
C0)
O
r
Efl
$ 14.00
$ 1.40
$ 225.00
$ 800.00
$ 900.00
$ 36.00
$ 41.00
000
O
.1- in
69 63
$ 750.00
$ 600.00
000
0
MCC
69
o
69
$ 25.00
OcOO
oCV
N
69
69
00
O
0)
fH
$ 1,300.00
00
O
0
••
bi
$ 95.00
00
0)
E9
$ 13.00
$ 35.00
000000.
r
E9
O
000
h
64
oo
NLC1
D)
64
69
u0l
o
69
0 R
o
N
69
$ 125.00 �-
$ 22.00
00
in
�Y
E9
$ 175.00 1
$ 175.00
oo
Or
69.
EA
O
0
o
CO
O
HIS
$ 1,540.00
0 0 0 0 0
00000
O LOC) d0' 10C)
CO CO CO CO
N ' N r
69 E9 69 b9 to
$ 3,525.00
$ • 480.00
$ 525.00
0
0
On
0
64
$ 170.00
$ 1,200.00
0
0
N
0
N
64
$ 420.00
0
0
LO
r
64
$ 2,520.00
0
0
CO
0
r
49
0
00
00
CON
C't
r
E9
0
Cr)
Efl
$ 3,187.80 1
0 0 0
N.000
o0
0) N 0
co Ch COO
LC 4.
69 E9 64
0
6
O
IC)
E9
$ 101,200.001
0
00
00
00
00
'1h
ES
$ 2,400.00
$ 609.00
$ 1,548.00
$ 5,445.00
$ 282.00
$ 1,800.001
$ 1,980.00
$ 837.60
$ 1,068.48
0
0.i
69.
0 0
r
69
$ 520.00
$ 840.00
$ 970.00
$ 42.00
$ 44.00
$ - 47.00
$ 160.00
$ 525.00
0
O.
C7
63
$ 170.00
00
O
(0
69
0
N
69
$ 21.00 1
$ 5.001
$ 840.00
0
0
In
Cory
EPr
$ 1,260.00
$ 120.00
0
CD
r
69.
$ 12.60
$ 30.00
$ 200.00
0
0
0
O
Ln
.9
0
0
0
N
C
EA
0
0
0
00
'd-
64
0 0 0
CD 0 0
O to
N X04
69 E9 64
$ 22.00r
$ 47.00
0
0
O
O0D
64
$ 180.00
0 0
0 CD
C r
ES 69
1
0 0
0 0
0000
0 0
V"N
69 64
$ 2,500.00
$ 700.00
$ 4,000.00
$ 1,449.00
$ 576.00
$ 1,950.00
$ 150.00
$ 800.00
$ 700.00
0
0
00
0
I4)
E9
0
0
0
CO
49
$ 1,560.00
0
0
0
69
0
0
6 c
O)
69
0
0
o
0
CO
CO
69
0
0
d
0
IC1
r
tf}
$ 1,500.00
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
ovo-cr'tn6000
CO N t- N N
• 0 CV r 00000
N Ne{IC)
69 E9 64 49. 64
0
0
0
O
r
49
0
0
0
O
LC)
64
0
0
0
L0
69
$ 2,000.00
$ 870.00
$ 360.00
$ 6,187.50
$ 390.00
00
o
O
N
69
$ 2,310.00
00 00
�4
0 LC)
r N
Eft 69
$ 12.00
$ 2.00
$ 500.00
$ 700.00
$ 800.00
$ 23.00
$ 24.00
$ 26.00
$ 50.00
1 $ 800.00
$ 700.00]
$ _ 500.00
1 $ 200.00
$ 20.00
1 $ 20.00
O
O
0
69
0
O
d
C'3-
r
64
0
O
0
(4)
r
6}
0
00000
0
Ln
69
$ 80.00
$ . 8.00
$ 10.00
$ 36.00
$ 125.00
0
000o
O
0
O
r
E9
0
o
0
O
0
64
0
o
0
IC)
E9
$ 0.50
$ 30.00
$ 30.00
$ 25.00
0
0
In
tD
69.
0
0
C
N
69.
0
o
O
N
64
0 0
r 0
C7
64 69
SY
GAL
EA
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
LF
W
W
EA
W
LF
C}!)
LB
EA
EA
EA
CY
LF
LF
SY
EA
LS
SIG SYS 1
CO
LF
EA
EA.
SF
W
W
EA
LF
LF
400
1,100
'- LO
CON
.J.
tN
f±)
31
253
427
144
3
0N
'd'
248
CO
10
rO
'CC C+)
0 CD
TYPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE 2" THICK FOR
DRIVEWAY
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL SIZES
AND TYPES)
12" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
18" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
12" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006
15" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006
18" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006
36" C.S. PIPE
4: '', ULKHEAD 36" C.S. PIPE
[INSULATION (4" THICKNESS)
'DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN 27" DESIGN 403 (W/
SALVAGED CASTING ASSEMBLY)
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN -MH 48" DESIGN 406 (W/
SALVAGED CASTING ASSEMBLY)
CONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MH 48" (W/ SALVAGED
CASTING ASSEMBLY)
RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B418
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618
4" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
MAILBOX SUPPORT
TRAFFIC CONTROL
FULL T ACT T CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM
REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKING - PERMANENT
REMOVE SIGN TYPE C
SALVAGE SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY)
SIGN PANELS TYPE C (F & I) (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY)
-IAZARD MARKER X4 -2
'AVEMENT MESSAGE (LT ARROW) POLY PREFORM
'AVEMENT MESSAGE (RT ARROW) POLY PREFORM
I" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT
t4" SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT
N C7
c0 C`7
,:' LO CD N. 0D 0) 0
C7 P) 0) CO CO CO '7
CO
N.
d'
0D
'
O)
eY
0
LC)
N C7 M1' LID
1.0 It) LC) LO to
CD
LO
N
IC)
CO
LC)
D) 0
LO CD CO
N
CD
CO
CD
et
CO
IC)
CD
CD n
t0. CO
i
TA
ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNE
BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2004, AT 10:00 AM
?¢Z
I-
d 0
OQ
z0
CCR-
<
W
Z Z [C
Odd
*DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION
z
z
0
DESCRIPTION
w0
Z
1 $ 1,983.80
$ 896.74,
$ 6,624.00
$ 14,175.00
$
200.0161
o
O
0
a)
69
o
O
0
N
69
as cv
N
co
c0
o
CD
$ 15.26
$ 0.13
$ 8.00
$ 2.25
o N
oo
69
,
N
64
o
oo
a)
s9
00 CO
0O o
N r
63 63
$ 6,541.20
00000,
Nm 00 0
C'))
cc c
69 69 63
o
d
N.
b9
r
co
CO
P-
n
cc)
4A
N:
L ) 0
in 63.
$ 7.90
$ 1.40
$ 25.00
$ 3.00
00
0
0
0
6i
0o co
LD CO
N r
in Ef•
o oo
n
Lfj
6.
° o 00 oo
CCDD N 0
O
c aj
64 69 69.
0
N
63
°
o
co
0)
6}
$ 20.00
$ 0.20
$ 7.00
2.00
$ 100.00
$ 2.25
$ 900.00,
J J
SF
LF
EA
SY
ACRE
130
6,898
828
0 0
CO N o
(0 4
N
TOTAL BIRCH STREET AND HODGSON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 1
24" STOP LINE WHITE -POLY PREFORM
4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT
ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE -POLY PREFORMED
SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED
INLET PROTECTION AT CB
SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT
SEEDING (INCL. SEED MIX 50B OR 60B, FERTILIZER,
MULCH, & DISC ANCHORING)
co CO°
n n ti
N-
E
w J F-
Q
d
• I-
<
Q
U
el
W
W ZE-
z
Emil
neL
z
cz
W
C!l
Z
W
2
W
0
CC
D_
2
0
0<
CO
Ow
W
11, oz-
9
Q Z
2
zwr
F- J
Q O O
F- J CA
C/)LLC/)
I 0
m U OU
TA
BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2004, AT 10:00 AM
*DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION
J z
Z
=
L W
❑ E
a
F—
Z
DESCRIPTION
WO •
F-
64636469636364
6464646464
636463636463636464646363
64
64
64
6964
4,
64
64646464646464
64
64
64
64 64
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
64 63 64
63
64
63
64
64
6464
64
64
000
000
O
LL
N
6969-69-
$ 13,312.00
$ - 8,910.00
$ 244.75
1 $ 1,440.50
Cn
°R
WO
0))
69.69.
o
0
LOC)_
-
1$ 19,221.20
1 $ 4,522.95
0
0
L!)
CO_ N
r
64
$ 15,191.00
$ 1,106.00
0
O
n
Cr1
69
I $ 1,000.85
$ 1,980.06
r 1,785.00
0
O
0
ON)
6!
1 $ 87,052.35
00
0
66
0
r
69-69.
$ 8,260.00
$ 57,744.00
$ 31,500.00
0
O
eti
CC
63
1 $ 1,250.00
0
0
Ln
CO
I�
n
69
Ln
LO
CC
CO ^
CD
64
$ 52,632.00
N 0
CO 1:
CO co
^ O O
6463
W
CD
CO n
64
COO
O
O
r
64
0
0
Lon
N
6969-
$ 208.00
$ 135.00
$ 4.45
Is 3.35
Ch
N
64
$ 150.00
$ 2.90
en
�'
C7
64
$ 325.00
$ 2.75
$ 158.00
o Ln
0 0
n N
CO
69.69.
$ 32.46
$ 595.00
0000
O
.u,....—.9-,—m
64
to
64
tt
6969-64
tD
$ 18.00
$ 15.00
Ln
N
V1
63
$ 250.00
$ 11.70
$ 14.85
$ 43.00
O W
. VN
69.64
$ 42.20
$ 52.65
WECX
—II—F--
TR
TR
LF
LF
LF
Q
W'
> -
WW
>-QLLQ
W
JW
LS
LF
1 LF 1
Q
W
CY
›.->.-i
UUU
CY.
CY
LF
HR
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
MENTS
64
66
55
56
O
r
6628
L j
r
n
5524
7
r C7
O
r
1 7537
840
1 002. I
m
V r
M N
O
1
l 6,050
r
r
1,224
O—
W
r
230
253
324
'BIRCH STREET AND HODGSON ROAD STREET IMPROVE
'MOBILIZATION
CLEARING
GRUBBING
REMOVE FENCE
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB
REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL TYPES & SIZES)
REMOVE WOODEN LANDSCAPING POST
REMOVE BIT SURFACE - STREET /DWY/fRAIUSHOULDER
(ALL DEPTHS)
MILL 2" BITUMINOUS - STREET
1 IAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
1 ILVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX SUPPORT
ILVAGE AND RELOCATE HYDRANT & GATE VALVE
IYSTEM
SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 12" PIPE SEWER CMP
SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 15" RCP
!SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 15" FES (RCP)
SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 24" FES (RCP)
COMMON EXCAVATION (P) (STREET /DRIVEWAY)
COMMON EXCAVATION (P) FOR TRAIL
SUBGRADE EXCAVATION
SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) (P)
CRUSHED ROCK -6' DEPTH (TRENCH STABILIZATION)
EXPLORATORY DIGGING
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED) (STREET,
DRIVEWAY)
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED) FOR TRAIL
TYPE MV AGG. 3 WEARING COURSE (C.S.A.H. 10, C.S.A.H.
49)
TYPE MV AGG. 3 NON - WEARING COURSE (C.S.A.H. 10,
C.S.A.H. 49)
TYPE LV AGG. 3 WEARING COURSE (WARE RD)
TYPE LV AGG. 3 NON- WEARING COURSE (WARE RD,
3OMMERCIAL DWYS)
TYPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE 2" THICK FOR TRAIL
N C9 er
to
W
1�
O
O
d'
tt)
CD
n
cD
T
O
N
N
N N
C7
N
Cr
N
to
N
O
N
N
cn
n,
O
ntr
r
•
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
UNIT TOTAL
PRICE AMOUNT
u)
Z
W
2
W
> Z
O O
LL F-
2 a g
O o v
CO o¢ 0 a.
® ▪ z0 1-
Q 0
cc
o 0 Z o N G
O 2 0C')) co m
co N W Z
1
F-JZ 6 2
WZ0 W W
Lz- — Z co
COUC0 a 1
0O2 p Z tu
CC ¢L U 0 m G
TABULATIO
F-
E
DESCRIPTION
I- 0
1
69
1
64
1
64
1
64
1
.69
1
69
1
69.
1
49
1
69
1
69
1.
69
1
49
1
H3.
1
64
1
49
1
64
69
1
49
1
E9
1
.69.
1
49
1
64
1
69
1
64
1
64
1
69
1
1
69
1
6
1
69
1
69
1
69.
1
69
1
49
1
69
1
69
1
69
1
69
1
64
1
64
1
49
1 1
49 64
1
69-
1
49
1
69.
1
69
1
69
1
64
1
49
1
69
1
64
1
64
1
49.
1 1
64 69
1
64 69.
1
64
1 1 1
64 64 49
1 1
69 49
1 1
64 69
1
64
1
64
1 1
49 E9
1
69
1
64
$ 5,440.00
0
T
49
$ 2,705.00
$ 865.60
$ 5,000.00
$ 2,726.64
$ 1,090.80
$ 3,651.75
0
co
64
$ 541.00
$ 378.00
0
o
r
69
$ 740.00
0
O
N
64
$ 432.80
n
T
69
0
CD
N
$ 1,460.00
$ 1,352.00
$ 3,348.00
$ 4,900.61
$ 5,960.92
$ 4,206.24
00 0
0. 0 000LO0
CO 0 0
d' ID O
(0 O
r
49 69 69
0 0
0 .COO
(0 N
69 64
CD 0
N N
CO CO.
r
64
$ 5,756.851
$ 292.20
$ 1,900.00
$ 2,090.00
$ 628.20
$ 1,119.36
0
CD
r
69.
$ 1.40
0
O
LO
69
0
CD
CO
64
$ 1,000.00
$ 43.28
$ 45.45
0)
CO
69
0
OR
r
49
$ 541.00 1
0
O
CO
64
$ 162.00
0
O
r
69
$ 27.05 1
CD
N
69.
7
CC)
6O9
0
O
0
0 CV
) )
Ea
0
O
O
o
T
64
$ 1,352.00
$ 108.00
ti co
07 CT N
D) 0) C))
rrN
64 49 63.
0 0 0
0 0 0
0000
( 0 0 O00
Ln u)
0
T
.69 69 1"
$ 5,100.00
$ 0.54 I
v (0
CO N
(0
NTN
69. 69
CD
N
C7
69-
$ 48.70
0 0
O O
00
CD Cr)
T...
69 E9
CO CD
O h
OT
69. 69
SY
GAL
EA
W
EA
LF
LF
LF
LF
<<
W
W
EA
<
W
LF J
)-m
co
J
EA
EA
<> -
W 0
LF
LF
SY
EA
LS
SIG SYS
U)LL<
J J
EA
EA
LL
CD
EA 1
EA
EA
LL LL
J J
400
O
T.
V)
1.-
LD�N�C7
r
Tr
d'
1 78
,1c,
CO
1
31
253
427
144
V) 1.- Tr
o00T
a'
N
248
co
TO r.d
r
C07
0 co
IT
TYPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE 2" THICK FOR
DRIVEWAY
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL SIZES
AND TYPES)
12" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
1 18" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
12" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006
15" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006
118" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006
W
Ll
E.
U
CD
C7
136" 45 DEGREE ELBOW FOR C.S. PIPE
4 '-' IULKHEAD 36" C.S. PIPE
INSULATION (4" THICKNESS)
1DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN 27' DESIGN 403 (W/
SALVAGED CASTING ASSEMBLY)
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN -MH 48" DESIGN 406 (W/
SALVAGED CASTING ASSEMBLY)
CONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MH 48° (W/ SALVAGED
CASTING ASSEMBLY)
RIP RAP CLASS III
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B418
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618
4" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SUPPORT
TRAFFIC CONTROL
FULL T ACT T CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM
REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKING - PERMANENT
REMOVE SIGN TYPE C
SALVAGE SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY)
SIGN PANELS TYPE C (F & I) (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY)
-IAZARD MARKER X4 -2
DAVEMENT MESSAGE (LT ARROW) POLY PREFORM
DAVEMENT MESSAGE (RT ARROW) POLY PREFORM
1" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT
?4" SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT
CO CV
1''))
CO
11')
C'0) 1177 CO
C0*)
0
V
'a
''^V
0)
0)
0
0 in
N 0) of
Eli 0) Li)
CO CD r- tin
(0 CD h
CO �
0) 1n
0 r
0 m
N
1,,
CD re.
TAI3ULATIO
E4
69
64
64
64
69
64
64
64
64
to
64
64
64
63
64
CO
h
CO
0
0
N
co
CO
O
O
O
r
to
co
Lo
CD
LO
N
CC)
c0
O
2„
1:
et
t-
ea.
64
64
64
64
61-
r
•
O
N
O
C()
0
in
r
N
CO.
O
CO
O
co
O
cc;
O
CV
co
4IAGN
UNIT
'RICE
N
CO
0
69
64
64
64
63
64
H3
LL
Cl-
<
}
-1
CO
L
W
CA
AC
VD
r
c0 co
cD
828
cD
N
O
vi:
N
124" STOP LINE WHITE -POLY PREFORM
4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT
(ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE -POLY PREFORMED
SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED
INLET PROTECTION AT CB
SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT
SEEDING (INCL. SEED MIX 50B OR 60B, FERTILIZER,
MULCH, & DISC ANCHORING)
TOTAL BIRCH STREET AND HODGSON ROAD IMPROVEME
GCOO
CO)D
°
n
n
CO
- n
• AGENDA ITEM 6H
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 14, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -82, Designating No Parking on Holly Drive
Improvement Project
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
State Aid requires a minimum 36 -foot wide street to allow parking along the Holly
Drive Improvement project. Currently, parking is mostly non - existent on Holly
Drive. A narrower street will be more desirable regarding traffic speeds on the
road. This has been discussed at the neighborhood meetings and with City
Council and it has been agreed upon not to allow street parking. The street
design is the city's standard width of 32 -feet.
As part of the street reconstruction, State Aid must receive a resolution from the
City for a No Parking Restriction on Holly Drive.
A copy of the resolution is attached.
OPTIONS:
I. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -82, Approving No Parking Resolution on Holly
Drive.
3. Not adopt Resolution Number 04 -82.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 04 -82 be adopted.
•
•
S.A.P.
to
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -82
HOLLY DRIVE NO PARKING RESTRICTION
210 - 109 -02 Holly Drive from Holly Court
12th Avenue in the City of
Lino Lakes , Minnesota.
WHEREAS, THIS RESOLUTION was passed this day of 2004, by the
City of Lino Lakes y
in Anoka County, Minnesota. The
Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City",
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, The "City", has planned the improvements of
State Aid Route No. 210 - 109 -02 Holly Drive
from Holl Court to
12th Avenue in the City of
Lino Lakes
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the "City" will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the improvements of this
Street; and
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the
street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid project must therefore be
conditioned upon certain parking restrictions.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED:
That the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on
both sides of Holl Drive from
Holly Court to 12th Avenue
at all times.
Dated this day of
, 2004.
ATTEST:
City of
Lino Lakes
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
, Minnesota.
•
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
ACTION REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA ITEM 61
Michael Grochala
June 14, 2004
Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -83
Accepting Feasibility Report on Improvements,
and Calling for Hearing on Improvements
Legacy at Woods Edge
Simple Majority
The City Council authorized preparation of a Feasibility Study for the Woods Edge
Improvements on March 22, 2004. Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., (SEH), the City's
consulting engineer has completed the report and will be presenting its findings at the
council meeting.
The proposed project includes the reconstruction and new construction of sanitary
sewer, storm sewer, water main, streets, streetscaping, sidewalks within the
development as well as proposed improvements to Lake Drive. The estimated cost of
the improvement is $8,382,000. The proposed improvements will service the proposed
Hartford Group development as well as the YMCA.
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 04 -83 which accepts the feasibility
study and calls for a hearing on improvements.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 04 -83
- 130A -
City Council
Legacy at Woods Edge
June 14, 2004
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -83
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
AND CALL FOR HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution NO. 04 -38 adopted by the council on March 22,
2004, a report has been prepared by Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., with reference to
the Legacy at Woods Edge project, to make improvements of street, sanitary sewer,
water main, storm sewer, streetscaping and sidewalks within the development area and
to make street and storm sewer and Traffic Signal improvements to Lake Drive adjacent
to the site, and this report was received by the council on June 14, 2004, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider such improvements in accordance with the report and the
assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the
improvement of $8,382,000.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 12 day of July,
2004 in the council chambers of the city hall at 6:30 p.m. and the clerk shall give
mailed and published notice of sch hearing and improvement as required by law.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of June, 2004.
Ann Blair, City Clerk
•
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 130B -
C I T Y �,;�;1 °�: �„ O F
IN KE
Feasibility Report
Legacy at Woods Edge Development
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
SEH No. A- LINOL0305.02
June 10, 2004
SEH
Multidisciplined. Single Source.
Trusted solutions for more than 75 years.
June 10, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy at Woods Edge Development
Feasibility Report
SEH No. A- LINOL0305.02
Attn: Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Please find enclosed our Feasibility Report for the construction of public improvements associated with
the Legacy at Woods Edge development.
This report addresses reconstruction of existing streets and storm sewers, extension of streets, sidewalks,
storm sewers, sanitary sewers, and water mains, and installation of streetscaping and landscaping
improvements. Streetscaping elements include decorative lighting, trees, shrubs, planters, planter beds,
enhanced sidewalks, benches, bicycle racks, litter receptacles, and bollards.
The report also identifies a number of amenities to be incorporated into a new City park in the heart of the
development. These amenities include a number of interactive water features and a staging /performance
area.
We have determined the public improvements identified in this report are technically feasible and are
necessary to support the proposed development.
We respectfully request the City consider the recommendations identified in this report and order a public
improvement hearing for the project.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Moberg, PE
Project Manager/Principal
n m lino no30502\rep o n s&sp ecs\feas. doo
SEH
Multidisciplined. Single Source.
Trusted solutions for more than 75 years.
Legacy at Woods Edge Development
Feasibility Report
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
SEH No. A- LINOL0305.02
June 10, 2004
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
Robert L. Moberg, PE
Date:
June 10, 2004
Reviewed by:
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
St. Paul, MN 55110-5196
651.490.2000
Lic. No.: 23334
G- /o- oy
Date
Table of Contents
Letter of Transmittal
Certification Page
Title Page
Table of Contents
Page
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Project History 1
1.2 Regulating Plan 2
2.0 Description of Project Elements 2
2.1 Roadway (Local Streets) 2
2.1.1 Existing Conditions 2
2.1.2 Proposed Improvements 2
2.1.3 Alternatives 3
2.2 Roadway (Lake Drive — CSAH 23) 3
2.2.1 Existing Conditions 3
2.2.2 Proposed Improvements 4
2.3 Sidewalks/Trails 5
2.3.1 Existing Conditions 5
2.3.2 Proposed Improvements 5
2.3.3 Alternatives 5
2.4 Streetscaping / Landscaping 5
2.4.1 Existing Conditions 5
2.4.2 Proposed Improvements 5
2.5 Retaining Walls 6
2.5.1 Existing Conditions 6
2.5.2 Proposed Improvements 6
2.5.3 Alternatives 6
2.6 Street Lighting 6
2.6.1 Existing Conditions 6
2.6.2 Proposed Improvements 6
2.7 Storm Sewer / Drainage 7
2.7.1 Existing Conditions 7
2.7.2 Proposed Improvements 7
2.7.2.A. Existing Village Drive/Town Center Parkway 7
2.7.2.B. Block 1 and Block 3 8
2.7.2.C. Block 2 8
2.7.2.D. Outlot A 8
2.7.3 Alternatives 9
2.8 Sanitary Sewer 9
2.8.1 Existing Conditions 9
2.8.2 Proposed Improvements 9
SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page i
Table of Contents (Continued)
2.8.3 Alternatives 10
2.9 Water Main 10
2.9.1 Existing Conditions 10
2.9.2 Proposed Improvements 10
2.9.3 Alternatives 11
2.10 Private Utilities 11
2.10.1 Existing Conditions 11
2.10.2 Proposed Improvements 11
2.11 City Park 11
3.0 Maintenance Impacts 11
4.0 Right -of -Way and Easements 12
5.0 Permits 12
6.0 Estimated Costs 12
7.0 Financing 13
8.0 Proposed Schedule 14
9.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 14
9.1 Conclusions 14
9.2 Recommendations 15
List of Tables
Table 1 Estimated Costs 13
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page ii
Table of Contents (Continued)
List of Figures
Figure 1 - Location Map
Figure 2 - Location Map
Figure 3 - Proposed Site Plan
Figure 4A — Streets
Figure 4B - Streets
Figure 5 - Proposed Roundabout Detail
Figure 6 - Lake Drive Improvements
Figure 7 - Proposed Tree Plantings
Figure 8 - Proposed Street Lighting
Figure 9 - Proposed Storm Sewer
Figure 10 - Proposed Sanitary Sewer
Figure 11 - Proposed Water Main
Figure 12 - Proposed Water Main Crossing of I -35W
Figure 13 - Proposed City Park
Figure 14 — Lake Drive Right -of -Way Requirements
List of Appendices
Appendix A Project Cost Estimates
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page iii
June 10, 2004
Feasibility Report
Legacy at Woods Edge Development
Prepared for the City of Lino Lakes
1.0 Introduction
The Legacy at Woods Edge development is a proposed 48.8 -acre Planned
Unit development (PUD) located in the southeast quadrant of the I -35W /
Lake Drive (CSAH 23) interchange in Anoka County (see Figures 1 and 2).
The site is bounded by Lake Drive to the west, I -35W to the north, Rice
Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park to the east, and the Lino Lakes City
Hall complex to the south.
1.1 Project History
In 1998, the City of Lino Lakes initiated preparation of a Master Plan for the
City's Town Center district. A draft Master Plan was completed in 2000 and
it identified the need to create a mixed -use development in the areas
surrounding the I -35W / Lake Drive interchange. The identified mix of uses
were to include retail, offices, entertainment, housing, recreation, civic, and
open space facilities, and were to be in compliance with the Livable
Communities Act adopted by the Metropolitan Council. Elements of the
Master Plan were implemented when the City Hall complex, Fairview Clinic,
and Lino Lakes State Bank buildings were constructed in 1998 and 1999.
In 1999, the City passed a resolution authorizing City staff to enter into an
agreement with the YMCA which would incorporate a new facility into the
project area. As part of the resolution, the City proposed to participate
financially in the cost of the new facility, as well as providing land and
public infrastructure at no cost to the YMCA.
In 2001, the City of Lino Lakes adopted a new Comprehensive Plan. The
Plan specifically guides the subject project area for Mixed Use Development.
In 2003, the Hartford Group entered into a purchase agreement with the Tagg
family for a 29 -acre parcel of land lying within the project area and also
entered into a purchase agreement with the City of Lino Lakes for City -
owned property between the Tagg property and the City Hall complex. A
proposed site plan was prepared by The Hartford Group that includes
A -LI NOL0305.02
Page 1
348,000 square feet of retail/office /service space and 450 residential units
(see Figure 3).
In November 2003, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was
prepared by SEH for the proposed development, as submitted by The
Hartford Group. A determination of No Significant Impact was made by the
Lino Lakes City Council in February 2004.
In March 2004, the subject property was rezoned to a PUD, a development
regulating plan and a preliminary plat was approved, and preparation of a
feasibility report for public improvements associated with the development
was ordered by the City Council.
1.2 Regulating Plan
The development regulating plan approved in March 2004 by the City
Council provides a framework for design and installation of public
improvements and amenities within the development. The document is
entitled "Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide ".
2.0 Description of Project Elements
2.1 Roadway (Local Streets)
2.1.1 Existing Conditions
Town Center Parkway is a bituminous - surfaced roadway with concrete curb
and gutter on both sides. Between Lake Drive and Village Drive, the street is
a four -lane, divided roadway with two 26 -foot wide drive lanes and a raised
median that varies in width from 10 feet to 22 feet. Existing right -of -way
width in this block is 80 feet. East of Village Drive, the street tapers to a two -
lane urban roadway that is 26 feet in width (curb face to curb face). Existing
right -of -way width in this section is 60 feet. Total length of the street is
approximately 1050 feet.
Village Drive is a bituminous- surfaced roadway with concrete curb and
gutter on both sides of the street. The street is 26 feet in width (curb face to
curb face) and existing right -of -way width is 60 feet. Total length of the
street is approximately 550 feet.
Both streets are in good condition, but are too narrow to safely carry the
traffic volumes that will be generated by the Legacy at Woods Edge
development.
2.1.2 Proposed Improvements
Town Center Parkway will be reconstructed as a four -lane divided urban
roadway from Lake Drive to the end of the existing roadway. A raised 14 to
16 -foot wide median with concrete curbs will be incorporated into the
reconstructed section and turn lanes will be added at the westbound approach
to Lake Drive, at Village Drive, and at entrances to Block 1. A median
opening to be provided at the easterly entrance to the City Hall complex will
allow vehicles exiting City Hall to turn left but will not allow left turns for
westbound traffic on Town Center Parkway. Right -of -way width will be 100
feet.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 2
Town Center Parkway will be extended northerly from the end of the
reconstructed section to a roundabout in the center of the development. This
section will be a two -lane, divided roadway with either raised or painted
medians. Street width will vary from 34 to 48 feet. Parallel parking bays will
be provided where roadway geometrics can accommodate the parking
movements. Right -of -way width will vary from 86 to 94 feet.
Village Drive will be reconstructed from Town Center Parkway to the end of
the existing roadway. The street section will have two 13 -foot wide travel
lanes with diagonal parking bays on the east side. Curb bumpouts will be
installed to protect parking bays, improve pedestrian safety, and provide
traffic calming
The streets around the City park will be established as one -way streets, with
Woods Edge Boulevard designated as one -way westbound and Village Green
designated as one -way eastbound. Travel lanes will be 14 feet in width. A
surmountable curb will be placed on the park side of each street to allow for
passage by emergency vehicles. Diagonal parking bays will be provided on
both streets.
Town Center Parkway from the roundabout to Woods Edge Boulevard and
Woods Edge Boulevard from the roundabout to Town Center Parkway will
be two -lane urban roadways and will be 32 or 44 feet in width. The wider
section will be used in areas where parallel parking is needed on both sides
of the street.
A roundabout is proposed in the center of the development. The location of
the roundabout was selected to provide a visual link to the City park, as well
as a transition from the commercial/retail area to the residential area. Use of
a roundabout at this intersection will also provide effective traffic control
while minimizing vehicle stops. The roundabout will feature a 16 -foot wide
travel lane, a landscaped central area, and landscaped approach medians. An
additional drivable surface will be provided on the inside of the travel lane to
accommodate truck turning movements.
Proposed street improvements are shown in Figures 4A and 4B. The
proposed roundabout is shown in Figure 5.
2.1.3 Alternatives
Preservation of existing Town Center Parkway and Village Drive was
considered and was rejected because the streets need to be widened to
accommodate the increase in traffic volumes expected with development of
the site.
Installation of a conventional four -leg intersection instead of the roundabout
was considered and was rejected because it did not meet the requirements
specified in the Town Center Design & Development Guide.
2.2 Roadway (Lake Drive — CSAH 23)
2.2.1 Existing Conditions
Lake Drive is a County State Aid Highway that is owned and maintained by
Anoka County. In the vicinity of the Legacy at Woods Edge site, Lake Drive
is a two -lane rural roadway with paved shoulders and is connected to I -35W
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 3
by a full diamond interchange. The road has a bituminous surface over a 24-
foot wide concrete pavement.
The existing bridge over I -35W is a concrete structure that is approximately
30 feet in width. The existing roadway south of the freeway interchange is in
fair to poor condition and the underlying concrete joints have caused
reflective cracking of the bituminous surface. Right -of -way width is 80 or
100 feet.
North of the freeway interchange, Lake Drive is a four -lane divided roadway
that was constructed in 2001. This section of roadway is in excellent
condition.
The northbound I -35W freeway exit and entrance ramps are offset along
Lake Drive and need to be realigned to improve intersection safety.
The Lake Drive intersections at Town Center Parkway, northbound I -35W
ramps, and southbound I -35W ramps are not signalized.
2.2.2 Proposed Improvements
Geometric improvements for Lake Drive were first identified in a traffic
study conducted by SEH, in response to submittal of the proposed site plan
by The Hartford Group.
Lake Drive is proposed to be reconstructed from a point approximately 700
feet south of Town Center Parkway to the I -35W freeway bridge. Beginning
at the south end, the roadway will be tapered from the existing two -lane
section to a four -lane section that includes northbound left and right -turn
lanes at the approach to Town Center Parkway. Immediately north of Town
Center Parkway, Lake Drive will have 3 southbound lanes (one through lane
and two left -turn lanes) and two northbound lanes. One of the northbound
lanes will serve exclusively as a right -turn lane to the I -35W northbound
entrance ramp. Approaching the I -35W northbound ramps, Lake Drive will
have one southbound lane, a large median area, and two northbound lanes.
Immediately north of the ramps, Lake Drive will have two southbound lanes
(one through lane and one left turn lane) and one northbound lane before
tapering down to the width of the existing bridge.
Northbound I -35W freeway entrance and exit ramps will be realigned to
eliminate the existing intersection offset at Lake Drive. Approximately 150
feet of the exit ramp and 550 feet of the entrance ramp will be realigned.
Full- actuated traffic signals will be installed at three intersections:
1. Lake Drive at Town Center Parkway
2. Lake Drive at realigned I -35W northbound ramps
3. Lake Drive at I -35w southbound ramps
A permanent signal will be installed at the Town Center Parkway intersection
while temporary signals will be installed at the two ramp intersections. To
optimize traffic operations, the three signals will be interconnected with an
existing signal at the intersection of Lake Drive and Apollo Drive.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 4
Proposed improvements for Lake Drive are shown in Figure 6.
A separate study is presently being conducted to evaluate widening or
replacement of the existing Lake Drive bridge over I -35W. Results of the
study may identify modifications that must be made to proposed Lake Drive
improvements.
2.3 Sidewalks/Trails
2.3.1 Existing Conditions
An 8 -foot wide bituminous sidewalk exists on the south side of Town Center
Parkway and extends from Lake Drive to the end of the existing roadway.
Village Drive has an 8 -foot wide bituminous sidewalk on the west side of the
street that extends from Town Center Parkway to the end of the existing
roadway. The sidewalk in both streets is in good condition but will interfere
with proposed street improvements.
2.3.2 Proposed Improvements
Commercial and retail buildings are proposed to be placed at the property
lines and will not be set back from the street right -of -way lines. To create a
downtown feel and to encourage pedestrian use of the corridors, full -width
sidewalks will be installed between the curb and adjacent buildings.
Sidewalk widths will vary from 12 to 15 feet in Blocks 1, 2, and 3, and
around the City park. Sidewalk materials are proposed to be concrete, paver
block, or a combination thereof.
For Outlot A (residential area), 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks will be
constructed in the streets surrounding Outlot A.
An 8 -foot wide bituminous trail will be placed on the south side of Town
Center Parkway and will extend from Lake Drive to the southwest corner of
Block 3. The trail will then be extended easterly along the southerly
boundary of Block 3 to the edge of Chain of Lakes Regional Park. It is
anticipated this trail will be extended into Chain of Lakes Regional Park in
the future. The segment of trail constructed with this project will be in
conformance with the City's Comprehensive Trail Plan.
2.3.3 Alternatives
Elimination of sidewalks throughout the development was considered and
rejected, as the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide
mandates the use of sidewalks to promote pedestrian activities within the
development.
2.4 Streetscaping / Landscaping
2.4.1 Existing Conditions
Streetscape elements currently are not found in the development area.
Landscaping consists of a few boulevard trees, grass boulevards, and areas of
native plantings.
2.4.2 Proposed Improvements
To promote the theme of a pedestrian - friendly environment, a number of
streetscape elements are proposed to be incorporated into the project. The use
of full -width sidewalks in the commercial/retail areas has been identified
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 5
elsewhere in this report. The Town Center Design & Development Guide
promotes the use of planters, benches, bicycle racks, decorative litter
receptacles and lighted bollards throughout the site to enhance the pedestrian
experience and to attract more business for the retail stores. Incorporation of
appropriate materials and architecture into the buildings within the
development is also an important consideration. The density and placement
of the various streetscape elements used in the development will be
determined during final design.
Boulevard trees will be planted throughout the development. In areas of
sufficient boulevard or median width, trees will be placed directly in the soil.
In areas of full -width sidewalk, trees will be placed in cutout areas and will
be bedded in a structural soil that promotes health of the trees. Tree grates
may be used in these areas to protect the trees. Irrigation systems will be
installed in landscaped medians and boulevards, as well as in areas with tree
wells.
Proposed boulevard tree planting details are shown in Figure 7.
2.5 Retaining Walls
2.5.1 Existing Conditions
There are no retaining walls along the existing streets in the project area.
2.5.2 Proposed Improvements
A retaining wall will be installed on the east side of Town Center Parkway in
the vicinity of the existing wetland next to the City Hall complex.
A retaining wall will also be required to support the pedestrian trail installed
along the southerly edge of Block 3. The wall will have the added feature of
providing a barrier that prevents parking lot runoff in Block 3 from
discharging directly to the existing wetland on the south end of Block 3.
Other retaining walls may be required in the development but it is anticipated
they would be installed on private property and would not be considered as
part of the public improvements.
2.5.3 Alternatives
Elimination of the retaining wall to support the pedestrian trail was
considered. This alternative was rejected as it would require the trail to either
be placed in the adjacent wetland or in the YMCA parking lot. Both options
are objectionable.
2.6 Street Lighting
2.6.1 Existing Conditions
Town Center Parkway and Village Drive have inplace street lighting fixtures
that provide adequate lighting at intersections and driveway entrances. The
fixtures are not compatible with the ornamental style of fixtures identified in
the Town Center Design & Development Guide.
2.6.2 Proposed Improvements
Street light fixtures proposed for the development are identical to the fixtures
used in the Market Center area on the north side of I -35W. The fixtures will
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 6
consist of 16 -foot poles with a single Domus -style luminaire. The lighting
units will be furnished with festoon outlets to accommodate decorative
holiday lighting or other uses. Banner brackets, support arms for hanging
planter baskets, and flag holders may also be incorporated. Individual
fixtures will be placed to provide an average illumination level of 1 foot -
candle.
The location and sizing of electrical supply cabinets will be determined
during final design, when total power demand for the site can be more
accurately evaluated. Underground conduit will be installed to accommodate
the wiring necessary for the system. The proposed street lighting system is
shown in Figure 8.
2.7 Storm Sewer / Drainage
2.7.1 Existing Conditions
Storm sewer was installed in Town Center Parkway and Village Drive in
1997 and 1998, when the City Hall complex was built. The existing storm
sewer system discharges to a storm water pond located south of Town Center
Parkway and west of the City Hall parking lot. The pond discharges into the
first in a series of wetlands that ultimately drain to either Marshan Lake or
George Watch Lake. Storm sewer pipes range in size from 12 to 24 inches in
diameter.
2.7.2 Proposed Improvements
Storm sewer and drainage improvements are proposed to be installed as four
separate systems. The systems are generally described as serving the
following areas:
1. Existing Village Drive/Town Center Parkway
2. Block 1 and Block 3
3. Block 2; and
4. Outlot A
Proposed improvements are shown in Figure 9.
2.7.2.A. Existing Village Drive/Town Center Parkway
The existing storm sewer in Village Drive will be replaced with a storm
sewer system ranging in size from 15 to 30 inches in diameter. The system
will extend northerly from Town Center Parkway to Village Green on the
south side of the City park and then will extend easterly in Village Green to
the roundabout. Woods Edge Boulevard on the north side of the City park
will also be connected to this system. Replacement of the existing system is
necessary to accommodate the additional drainage area being served by the
system.
The existing storm sewer system in Town Center Parkway will be replaced to
accommodate a roadway section that must be widened to support the traffic
volumes generated by the development.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 7
The existing storm water pond located on the south side of Town Center
Parkway and west of the City Hall parking lot will be expanded to
accommodate the additional drainage area being routed to the storm sewer in
Village Drive. Another storm water pond will be excavated on the south side
of Town Center Parkway near Lake Drive to eventually receive storm water
runoff generated from the widening of Lake Drive.
2.7.2.B. Block 1 and Block 3
A storm water pond will be excavated in the middle of Block 1 to collect
runoff from the surrounding parking lot and buildings. A series of
underground storm water chambers will be installed under the parking lot to
provide infiltration. An 18 -inch storm sewer will be installed between the
storm water pond and an existing wetland located north of City Hall. This
line will function as a pond overflow.
A storm water pond will be excavated on the southerly end of Block 3 to
hold runoff from the adjacent parking lot. The pond will be connected to a
series of underground storm water chambers to allow for infiltration. A pond
overflow pipe will be installed to convey treated storm water to an existing
wetland located north of City Hall.
Some small drainage areas in Town Center Parkway will be connected via
storm sewer to the underground storm water chambers. Pipe sizes will range
in size from 15 to 18 inches in diameter.
Drainage systems within the parking lots in Blocks 1 and 3 are considered
private improvements and are outside the scope of this report.
2.7.2.C. Block 2
A storm water pond will be excavated in the northwesterly corner of Outlot B
to receive runoff from Block 2. The pond will discharge to a large existing
wetland that abuts the northeasterly side of the proposed development.
A storm sewer system will extend southwesterly from the pond to Town
Center Parkway and will terminate on the north side of the roundabout. Pipe
sizes will range from 15 to 30 inches in diameter.
2.7.2.D. Outlot A
A storm water pond will be excavated in the northeasterly corner of Block 3
to accommodate drainage from the south half of Outlot A and from Woods
Edge Boulevard between Outlot A and the YMCA facility. The pond will
discharge to the existing wetland that abuts the development on the east.
A storm sewer system will extend from the pond to Woods Edge Boulevard
on the south side of Outlot A and then extend westerly to the entrance to the
YMCA facility. Pipe sizes will range from 15 to 18 inches in diameter.
A second storm water pond will be excavated in Outlot B to receive runoff
from the northerly half of Outlot A. Storm sewer will be extended westerly
from the pond to collect street runoff and to serve as a pond overflow for a
private storm water pond to be built within Outlot A.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 8
2.7.3 Alternatives
Eliminating the use of underground storm water chambers for infiltration and
increasing pond sizes to offset the loss of infiltration was considered. This
approach was rejected because it would not meet infiltration criteria required
by Rice Creek Watershed District and would result in a significant reduction
of land available for development.
Installation of a single system to serve the entire development was
considered. This approach was rejected because infiltration would become
more difficult, pipe sizes and corresponding costs would increase
significantly, and staging of development for the entire site would be
virtually eliminated. The use of multiple drainage systems will allow overall
development to be divided into smaller, more manageable phases.
2.8 Sanitary Sewer
2.8.1 Existing Conditions
Sanitary sewer was extended in Town Center Parkway and Village Drive
when Phases I and II of the Village development was constructed in 1997
and 1998. A 12 -inch PVC gravity sewer exists in Town Center Parkway from
Lake Drive to the end of the existing roadway. A 12 -inch PVC gravity sewer
also exists in Village Drive from Town Center Parkway to the end of the
existing roadway. Both sewer mains are in very good condition.
2.8.2 Proposed Improvements
A 10 -inch PVC gravity sewer will be extended northerly in Town Center
Parkway from the end of the existing 12 -inch main to the southeast corner of
the new City park. This run of sewer is approximately 400 feet in length. An
8 -inch stub will be provided to serve Block 1 of the proposed development.
A 10 -inch PVC gravity sewer will be extended northerly in Village Drive
from the end of the existing main to Woods Edge Boulevard on the north
side of the City park, then easterly in Woods Edge Boulevard to the proposed
roundabout. A 10 -inch main will be extended easterly from this point to the
entrance to the YMCA facility. The length of this sewer run is approximately
1200 feet.
An 8 -inch PVC gravity sewer will be extended northeasterly in Town Center
Parkway from the roundabout to the intersection with Woods Edge
Boulevard. The length of this run of sewer is approximately 950 feet.
An 8 -inch PVC gravity sewer will be extended easterly in Woods Edge
Boulevard from the YMCA entrance to the southeasterly corner of Outlot A
and then northerly into Outlot A. A second 8 -inch PVC gravity main will
also be extended into Outlot A. Total length of these two sewer runs is
approximately 1000 feet.
Eight -inch sewer stubs will be installed at multiple locations for Blocks 1, 2,
and 3. Some of these stubs will be connected to existing sewers in Town
Center Parkway and Village Drive.
Existing and proposed sanitary sewers are shown in Figure 10.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 9
2.8.3 Alternatives
A "do nothing" alternative was considered and rejected as extension of
municipal sanitary sewer into the project area is necessary to serve the
proposed development.
2.9 Water Main
2.9.1 Existing Conditions
Water main was installed in Town Center Parkway and Village Drive as part
of Phases I and II of the Village development. A 10 -inch DIP main exists in
Town Center Parkway from Lake Drive to the end of the existing roadway. A
10 -inch DIP main also exists in Village Drive between Town Center
Parkway and the end of the existing roadway. The existing water main
currently serves as a dead end and is not looped to the existing system on the
north side of the freeway. The length of this dead end and the resulting lack
of circulation likely have contributed to water quality issues at the City Hall
Complex.
2.9.2 Proposed Improvements
A 10 -inch DIP water main will be extended northerly in Town Center
Parkway from the end of the existing main to the roundabout and then
easterly in Woods Edge Boulevard to the southeasterly corner of Outlot A.
Length of this pipe run is approximately 1600 feet.
A 10 -inch DIP water main will be extended northerly in Village Drive from
the end of the existing main to Woods Edge Boulevard. Length of this main
is approximately 250 feet.
A 12 -inch DIP main will be installed in Woods Edge Boulevard between
Village Drive and the roundabout. This main will be extended in new Town
Center Parkway from the roundabout to the northerly boundary of the
development. Length is approximately 1350 feet.
Eight -inch DIP water mains will be looped around and through Outlot A.
Eight -inch stubs will be provided at multiple locations for Blocks 1, 2, and 3.
Exact location of the stubs will be determined as individual building concepts
are refined. Total length is approximately 1600 feet.
Fire hydrants and fire service lines will be installed at appropriate locations,
in accordance with City and State Fire Codes.
A 12 -inch DIP or HDPE main will be installed under the freeway and will be
connected to an existing 8 -inch DIP main in the vicinity of the McDonald's
restaurant on the north side of the freeway. A casing pipe will also be
installed under the freeway to satisfy Mn/DOT requirements for containing a
pressurized main. This main is for looping purposes and is considered to be a
trunk line capital improvement in accordance with the City's 2004
Comprehensive Water System Plan. Total length of the 12 -inch loop is
approximately 600 feet.
Existing and proposed water mains are shown in Figure 11. The proposed
water main crossing of I -35W is shown in Figure 12.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 10
2.9.3 Alternatives
Postponing installation of the freeway crossing until a future date was
considered. This alternative was rejected because the intensity of the
proposed development will require a significant level of fire protection that
can be met only if the system is looped across the freeway.
2.10 Private Utilities
2.10.1 Existing Conditions
Existing buildings in the development area are presently served with gas,
electric, telephone, and cable television facilities.
2.10.2 Proposed Improvements
Further development of the site will require extension and expansion of
private utilities. To effectively manage the public right -of -way, the City
should incorporate early and frequent coordination with private utility
companies. The City may want to consider installing utility conduits as part
of the public improvements project and then leasing conduit space to the
various utility companies.
Location and sizing of private utility lines must be determined by each utility
company.
2.11 City Park
A conceptual plan has been developed for the new City park. The plan
incorporates a central green, a plaza area, and a seasonal garden area. The
use of tree plantings, sidewalks, paver blocks, interactive water features, and
flower beds would promote the park as a gathering place and as an area that
could host outdoor events and concerts on a seasonal basis. Creation of a
City park within the development is consistent with the Town Center Design
& Development Guide.
Proposed park improvements are shown in Figure 13.
3.0 Maintenance Impacts
Maintenance requirements resulting from this project, while typical for a
downtown area, will be unique for the City and will create the need for
revised City policies related to snow removal, street sweeping, sidewalk
cleaning, and landscape irrigation and upkeep. The expectations of individual
business owners in the "downtown" retail area must be identified and met to
ensure a successful relationship between the City and the merchants in
maintaining the public improvements.
The City may want to explore creating an agreement with the business
district to streamline snow removal operations in the public right -of -way and
private parking lots. Similar agreements could be developed for maintenance
of landscaping and lighting, as well as for sweeping of streets and parking
lots.
The City also may want to consider contracting for maintenance of the street
lighting system.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 11
Maintenance requirements for sanitary sewer and water main improvements
are expected to be nominal.
Periodic inspections of storm sewer and drainage facilities will need to be
done to verify they are functioning as intended.
4.0 Right -of -Way and Easements
Local street and utility improvements will be constructed within right -of -way
or easement corridors identified in the preliminary plat for the development.
Dedication of the right -of -way and easement corridors will occur when a
final plat is filed and recorded with Anoka County.
The water main crossing of I -35W will require a dedicated utility easement
on the north side of the freeway.
Reconstruction of Lake Drive will require additional permanent right -of -way
from two parcels on the west side of the existing road (see Figure 14).
Realignment of the I -35W northbound entrance ramp will require additional
permanent right -of -way across a parcel of land identified as Outlot C of The
Village No. 1.
Results of a separate study of the Lake Drive bridge over I -35W may identify
additional right -of -way required to accommodate replacement of the bridge
or widening of Lake Drive.
5.0 Permits
The following permits are anticipated:
• Anoka County for work in Lake Drive (CSAH 23) right -of -way
• Mn/DOT for work in I -35W right -of -way
• Rice Creek Watershed District for site grading and drainage
improvements
• MPCA for sanitary sewer extensions
■ MPCA for an NPDES general storm water construction permit
■ MDH for water main extensions
• DNR for temporary dewatering of utility trenches
• Metropolitan Council for sanitary sewer extensions
• Army Corps of Engineers for work in protected wetlands.
6.0 Estimated Costs
Estimated costs for various elements of the project are summarized in the
table below. Total costs include construction, 10 percent for contingencies,
and 30 percent for administrative, engineering, legal, and fiscal costs. Land
acquisition costs are not included.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 12
Table 1
Estimated Costs
Estimated
Project Element Cost
Local Street Reconstruction $573,800
Local Street Extensions $1,060,200
Lake Drive Reconstruction $2,401,500
Streetscaping /Landscaping $1,246,700
Street Lighting $916,600
Storm Sewer /Drainage $857,900
Sanitary Sewer $242,600
Water Main 1) $492,400
City Park $590,300
Total $8,382,000
1) Includes $155,100 for trunk crossing of I -35W.
A more detailed cost estimate is included in the Appendix of this report.
7.0 Financing
A project of this complexity presents some unique challenges in the area of
funding. A combination of City utility funds, Met Council grants, special
assessments to benefiting properties and tax increment financing (TIF) is
anticipated to be utilized in financing various elements of the project. Anoka
County may provide some funding for improvements in Lake Drive. Freeway
ramp realignment and signalization may be eligible for Mn/DOT funding
through the agency's Cooperative Agreement program.
Extension of street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main
improvements into the development are proposed to be assessed on an area
basis to benefiting properties within the development.
Installation of a water main across I -35W for looping purposes is considered
a system improvement and will be financed with City trunk utility funds.
Street lighting, streetscaping, and landscaping improvements are proposed to
be assessed on an area basis to benefiting properties within the development.
The City has received a Livable Communities grant from the Met Council
and is in the process of pursuing additional funding from the agency.
Feasibility Report
City of Lino Lakes Page 13
A -LI NOL0305.02
8.0 Proposed Schedule
A proposed timetable for implementing the improvements identified in this
report is outlined below:
• City Council Receives Feasibility Report and
Calls for Public Improvement Hearing June 14, 2004
• Publish Notice of Public Hearing June 2004
• Public Improvement Hearing
July 12, 2004
• Council Orders Preparation of Plans & Specifications July 26, 2004
• Council Approves Plans & Specifications and
Orders Advertisement for Bids October 2004
•
•
Bids Received
November 2004
Council Awards Bid December 2004
Project Construction April- October 2005
Final Assessment Hearing October 2005
The timing for construction of improvements in Lake Drive may follow a
different schedule and will be dependent on the outcome of the bridge
replacement study and subsequent programming
9.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
9.1 Conclusions
As a result of this feasibility study, we conclude the following:
1. The City of Lino Lakes has devoted significant time and resources to
planning for a "downtown" area in the community, as evidenced by
creation of the Town Center Design & Development Guide.
2. The Hartford Group has demonstrated a strong willingness to partner
with the City in developing a downtown area that is consistent with the
Town Center Design & Development Guide.
3. The City's commitment to the YMCA can best be achieved by
incorporating a facility into the overall plan for Legacy at Woods Edge.
4. Street and utility improvements identified in this report are necessary to
support the proposed development, are feasible from an engineering
standpoint, and are cost - effective in meeting the public service demands
generated by the development.
5. Existing roadway widths of Town Center Parkway and Village Drive are
not sufficient to safely carry the traffic volumes anticipated with the
development.
6. Geometric improvements to Lake Drive are necessary to handle the
expected increase in traffic volumes entering and exiting the
development.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 14
7. Freeway ramp realignment and signalization are necessary to improve
safety in the Lake Drive corridor.
8. Existing sanitary sewer facilities are adequate to convey the additional
wastewater flows generated by the development.
9. Looping of water main will be necessary to provide adequate fire
protection for the development.
10. Implementation of significant streetscape and street lighting elements is
necessary to create a pedestrian - friendly environment within the
development.
11. If the City is to maintain the proposed streetscape and landscape
elements identified in this report, additional equipment and personnel
may be required.
9.2 Recommendations
Based on the aforementioned conclusions, we recommend the following:
1. The City Council accept this report and order a public improvement
hearing.
2. The City should enter into a developer's agreement with The Hartford
Group to further define project cost participation.
3. The City should formalize an agreement with YMCA to define project
cost participation.
4. The City should apply for funding of freeway ramp realignment and
signalization through Mn/DOT's Cooperative Agreement program.
5. The City should pursue funding from Anoka County for Lake Drive
improvements.
6. The City should initiate acquisition proceedings for right -of -way
necessary for Lake Drive improvements, freeway ramp realignment, and
water main looping across I -35W.
7. A special maintenance district should be established either by the City or
by the development's retail association to generate revenue used in
covering the cost of ongoing maintenance.
Feasibility Report A- LINOL0305.02
City of Lino Lakes Page 15
List of Figures
Figure 1 - Location Map
Figure 2 - Location Map
Figure 3 - Proposed Site Plan
Figure 4A — Streets
Figure 4B - Streets
Figure 5 - Proposed Roundabout Detail
Figure 6 - Lake Drive Improvements
Figure 7 - Proposed Tree Plantings
Figure 8 - Proposed Street Lighting
Figure 9 - Proposed Storm Sewer
Figure 10 - Proposed Sanitary Sewer
Figure 11 - Proposed Water Main
Figure 12 - Proposed Water Main Crossing of I -35W
Figure 13 - Proposed City Park
Figure 14 — Lake Drive Right -of -Way Requirements
cirN
•
mina
NrIMPrik_11
mannil
Anoka County
Source: Anoka County, Mn /DOT, USGS, MNDNR, and SEH.
UTM, Zone 15, Meters
NA083
F Legacy at Woods Edge General
S Q �
KES SEH Development Location Map
Figure 1
; .1...93201S •••
' Iit yT 7...)
7
•
'\\
4
• •et
• '. ' 7
■ I ---'''
I - ' ;
)■■ z
\
••7
, / • - •
,•r
1
1
1
1
1
1
I;
•
j •
• (
I "
• L.
„ • )
•
.- - - —
,---) /
7- •,./----
i....-'- -----
_, -- --
•
•
: •
- " •
' ' , •
, •
°L. 37-1,43,i1
•
•
• ••
, N. • •
lk00
"111
,..• . N Il NI-..--,„
,, ', ---,-- • --4-,---... 11
"....„,,, ----ts, ITIrf_r•• r------,
....„, ) •.:1---.9—•:,
,12)1 •,r, II '-;-,---.-
\ .1/1-
1-1„:;'-- .
, M
LI
Al" • ' 41' SN 00
C•;7?).
006
.- - ,,. ,4 t . • • •
:-./' :-.--,-,---„,->-..
\! ) ,.,
..._ ..-„,—........, ,/
s, ,...., .„---.. .
A ''..---•—•-,1 •.
? • • '.. • • _.., • x • 7•,. 1
1
=.1
OU1 "'d\ 0)
UN I ON MI MI I MI OM ER NM In MI In r r- AI en
1 -35 W
15
11101111011411
JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IJ
0 111{111114111111i D
MAIM% D
s.!- J1♦
ITY . F
KES SEH
15
BUILDING TYPE SUMMARY
LEGACY AT WOOD'S EDGE - LINO LAKES, MN
LOT
NUMBER BUILDING TYPE
1 Commercial /Grocery/Office
2 Commercial /Retail /Office
3 Commercial /Retail /Office
4 Commercial /Retail /Office
5 Commercial/Retail/Office
6 Commercial /Retail /Housing
7 Commercial /Retail /Office
8 Commercial/Retail/Office
9 Commercial /Retail /Office
10 Commercial /Retail /Office /Housing
11 Commercial
12 Commercial
13 Commercial
14 Commercial
15 Townhomes
16 Commercial /Retail /Office /Housing
17 Commercial /Retail /Office /Housing
18 YMCA
19 Existing Fairview
20 Existing Bank
21 Existing City Hall
22 Existing Children's Welfare
23 Existing Police Station
MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM
BUILDING NUMBER NUMBER SF SF RESIDENTIAL
FOOTPRINT FLOORS FLOORS COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL UNITS
13,700
8,500
4,300
7,000
3,600
26,700
22,092
5,500
5,500
34,000
10,000
10,000
10,200
10,000
NA
20,800
17,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
208,892
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NA
1
1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1
3
2
3
3
4
4
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
NA
4
4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Legacy at Woods Edge
Development
13,700
8,500
4,300
7,000
3,600
26,700
22,092
5,500
5,500
34,000
10,000
10,000
10,200
10,000
NA
20,800
17,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
208,892
13,700
25,500
8,600
21,000
10,800
26,700
22,092
11,000
16,500
34,000
30,000
30,000
30,600
30,000
NA
20,800
17,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
348,292
Coordinate System:
Anoka County, NAD83, Feet
Proposed Development Site Plan
Map Document (C \Prolects\Lino_EAW_Village \Proposed Development Site Plan 11x17 mad)
5/27/2004 -- 10 21 12 AM
0
150
300
600
900
1,200
Feet
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
67
55
NA
NA
68
NA
NA
NA
NA
190
38
32
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
450
NORTH
Figure 3
100 0 100 200
9C01G Q feet
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
•
LINO LAKES,
MINNESOTA
LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE
LEGEND
TRAFFIC DIRECTION ARROWS
CROSSWALK
PARKING STRIPING
CENTERLINE STRIPING
" *NOTE **
SEE FIGURE 4B FOR TYPICAL SECTIONS
PROPOSED ROAD
LAYOUT
FILE NO.
ALINOL0305.02
DATE
05/18/04
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ROW
ROW
ROW
75'
ROW
ROW
ROW
54'
ROW
ROW
" *NOTE **
SEE FIGURE 4A FOR PLAN VIEW OF ROADS
ROW
66'
12'
14'
E
15'
DIAL. PARKING
13'
6.5'
12'
11'
13'
C
32.5' SDWK /BLVD.
IT
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2x
`-
L
L GE
LUNTAB
LI
GREE N
VLLAGE
J
DRIVE
LE CURB E-E
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
ROW
70'
A-A
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
ROW
75'
14'
15'
DIAG. PARKING
14'
C
15'
DIAG. PARKING
12'
14'
13'
13'
15'
DIAGONAL PARKING
15' SDWK
C6
2%
I
2%
2%
2%
2x
2%
2%
L
VLLAGE
,J
DRIVE
V
WOODS EDGE
v \
BOULEVARD SURMOUNTABLE CURB
ROW
ROW
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
ROW
100'
ROW
ROW
F-F
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
ROW
60'
5'
SDWK
3'
BLVD
9'
PARKING
13'
13'
9'
PARKING
3'
BLVD
5'
SDWK
11'
SDWK
9'
PARKING
13'
E
13'
9'
PARKING
11'
SDWK
12' SDWK
9'
PARKING
13'
13'
C
14'
MED.
13'
13'
4'
BLVD
8' BIT
TRAIL
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2x
2x
2x
zx
2x
2%
1'
WOODS EDGE
r
BOULEVARD
a
TOWN CENTER
PARKWAY
a. a
TOWN CENTER
a.
PARKWAY
G-G
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
ROW
60'
I - I
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
ROW
66'
C-C
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
ROW
100'
1'
8' BIT
TRAIL
13'
15'
4'
12'
11'
12'
8'
BLVD
4'
5'
SDWK
8'
BLVD
12'
12'
8'
PARKING
8' BIT TRAIL
5'
SDWK
4'
1'
5'
SDWK
8'
BLVD
16'
16'
8' BIT TRAIL
6' BLVD
4'
BLVD -
n
2%
16' MED
2R
2%
2%
2x
ft
2x
2x
n
a
2%
11
2%
2%
2%
TOWN CENTER
`
PARKWAY
TOWN CENTER
PARKWAY
Lb
WOODS EDGE
BOULEVARD
D-0
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
J
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
H-H
(SEE PLAN VIEW, FIG 4A)
/
SEH
CITY O F
IN KE
LINO LAKES,
MINNESOTA
LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE
PROPOSED
TYPICAL SECTIONS
FILE NO.
ALNOL0305.02
FIGURE
NO.
4B
DATE
5/18/04
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
14' LANE
1111111111/11-
�1'_
■■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■■■■. ■■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■L
■ ■�M ■ .� .°■■ -...swer.:_my,
■■ ■■ ■■ ■. itinta%
Troxv
wax
titest
A/Fr
.0
7
Plan View
0 10' 20' 40' 60'
Section AA
0 5' 10' 20' 40'
Figure 5
Hartford Group Inc.
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
cirY l' �J
L NOL ICES SEH
Legacy at Woods Edge
Development
Legend
Lane Markings Existing ROW 11 Traffic Signal
Existing Bridge
Source: Anoka County, Lino Lakes, and SEH.
Coordinate System:
Anoka County, NAD83, Feet
Proposed Lake Drive Improvements
20.
0
150 300
600
900
1 2i Feet
Figure 6
1
HIM
1i
1u•
1
1
1,41111 11M11•11■I11I \A■■MEIV■
1•1111•••=1•1I•1••11IUI••
bti
I1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
oar
O1 \030501 \EP \SURVEY,
' PROPOSED_.:,�
STREET I�
PROPOSED
STREET LIGHT, TYP.
SEH
LINO LAKES,
MINNESOTA
LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE
100 0 100 200
1 ME pg >1
scale feet
LEGEND
PROPOSED STREET LIGHT
PROPOSED
LIGHTING PLAN
FILE NO.
ALINOL0305.02
DATE
05/18/04
FIGURE
NO.
8
FILE NO.
ALINOL0305.0';
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
\EP \LNJOSUT, x\
too
scab ME
N
too 200
feet
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
/MANHOLE, TYP.
ji <
PROPOS ' t. CAT BASJ,N
CASTI :1 7 \.
�yy
STORM POND
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
CATCH BASIN, TYP.
PROPOSED STORM
SEWER, TYP.
\
s A
fi
SEH
EASEMENT
20' BRAIN AGE EASEMENT
STORM POND
"STORM PON!)
• \
•
WETLAND
4
LINO LAKES,
MINNESOTA
WETLAND
20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
LEGEND
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE
PROPOSED STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN
PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION W/ RIP RAP
PROPOSED STORM WATER POND
LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE
PROPOSED STORM
SEWER LAYOUT
•
DATE
05/18/04
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
P \LN305UT, X: \KO\U
N
100 0 100 200
sale 50
1/
/
/
/
%/ /
/
/
/
SEH
feet
CONNECT TO
EXISTING
SANITARY
_ MANHOLE
PROPOSED
SANITARY
MANHOLE, TYP.
10"
VC
/j
,INSTALL SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE AND
S" STUB T0. ROW-
4
/
‘41.11):/■
CONNECT TO STING.
SANITARY SE R
WETLAND
WETLAND
CIT OF
IN KE
CONNECT TO EXISTING
MANHOLE. INSTALL
STUB TO ROW
LINO LAKES,
MINNESOTA
LEGEND
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE •
LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE
PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER ROUTING
FILE NO.
ALINOL0305.02
DATE
05/18/04
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
100
0
N
100
200
scale 50
feet
CONNECT TO EXISTING
WATER MAIN . INSTALL.
8" STUB TO ROW
12 "WATERMAIN
STUB
CONNECT TO
EXISTING
WATER MAIN
PROPOSED
HYDRANT &
VALVE, TYP.
ATER
1
1
1
1
1
1
lJ
SEH
•
•
WETLAND
\\ 1
CONNECT TO EXISTING
WATER MAIN. INSTALL
8° STUB TO ROW
CONNECT TO TING
WATER MAI .
4
LINO LAKES,
MINNESOTA
WETLAND �•.
LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE
LEGEND
EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING GATE VALVE
EXISTING HYDRANT
PROPOSED WATER MAIN
PROPOSED GATE VALVE
PROPOSED HYDRANT AND VALVE
NOTE: ALL WATERMAIN SHALL
BE DIP CL 52
PROPOSED WATER
MAIN ROUTING
FILE NO.
ALINOL0305.02
DATE
05/18/04
N NM W = MI N NM MI 1111111 M IIIIIII NIP M MO N •
x
E
v)
.7)
0
U
c
2
m
0
C
2
1—
LO
0)
M
1
0 CD
C
J
N
oa
ar--
U of
N
N.-
E
0 0
0 0
N
0.
m
�cp
Existing 8" WM
Drainage Easements]
Proposed 12" Trunk WM
SEH
ALINOL0305.02
June
2004
Lino Lakes, MN
I -35W Trunk Water Main Crossing
Figure 12
1
OM IMME ME
1
1
1
1
MIII■NIM ME ■ ■ •■ ■ ■MM■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■■ \ ■■■■ ■■ ■\■■MPP
�■■■ ■■a ■■ ■■■ ■ ■�■■ ■ ■■��■■■■ ■■■■■111111■
%>.
lawmgetpip
Atit.*.121
Ian
00611160110
1
1
1
1
1
1
itzteo
1
1
1
1
1
1
U
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
x
E
N
X
Vl
C
E
2
t7
a)
CC
0
a)
0
a)
cU
J
4)
tT
R7
W
or
C.)
a) 2
O ti
D_ co
i Cr)
U
N
E
o p
o
N
o
IQ
Q
LIN•I•KES SEH
Legacy at Woods Edge
Development
Lake Drive Right -of -Way Requirements
Legend
Existing ROW
- ROW Requirements (sf)
Source: Anoka County, Lino Lakes, and SEH.
2�
Coordinate System:
Anoka County, NAD83, Feet
0
150 300
600
900
'2K et
Figure 14
Appendix A
Project Cost Estimates
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy At Woods Edge
A -LI N OL0305.02
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
NEW IMPROVEMENTS
SANITARY SEWER
1 Mobilization LS 1 $8,100.00 $8,100.00
2 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole EA 2 $750.00 $1,500.00
3 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer EA 3 $500.00 $1,500.00
4 12" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (18' -20' deep) LF 132 $36.00 $4,752.00
5 10" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (16' -18' deep) LF 458 $32.00 $14,656.00
6 10" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (18' -20' deep) LF 1,024 $34.50 $35,328.00
7 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 35 (10' -12' deep) LF 1,654 $20.00 $33,080.00
8 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 35 (12' -14' deep) LF 229 $23.50 $5,381.50
9 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 35 (14' -16' deep) LF 195 $26.00 $5,070.00
10 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (16' -18' deep) LF 50 $28.00 $1,400.00
11 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (18' -20' deep) LF 340 $30.00 $10,200.00
12 Standard Sanitary MH (0 -8' deep) EA 21 $1,425.00 $29,925.00
13 Extra Depth Sanitary MH LF 123 $100.00 $12,300.00
14 Televise Sanitary Sewer LF 4,082 $0.60 $2,449.20
15 Improved Pipe Foundation Material LF 2,000 $2.00 $4,000.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT COST
$169,641.70
$16,964.17
$186,605.87
$55,981.76
$242,587.63
WATER MAIN
16 Mobilization LS 1 $11,200.00 $11,200.00
17 Salvage Hydrant EA 5 $600.00 $3,000.00
18 Salvage Gate Valve & Box EA 5 $300.00 $1,500.00
19 Connect to Existing Water Main EA 6 $700.00 $4,200.00
20 12" DIP Water Main, Class 52 LF 1,250 $28.00 $35,000.00
21 10" DIP Water Main, Class 52 LF 1,830 $26.00 $47,580.00
22 8" DIP Water Main, Class 52 LF 2,980 $22.00 $65,560.00
23 6" DIP Water Main, Class 52 LF 200 $18.00 $3,600.00
24 Furnish & Install Hydrant EA 8 $1,800.00 $14,400.00
25 12" Gate Valve & Box EA 3 $1,100.00 $3,300.00
26 10" Gate Valve & Box EA 3 $925.00 $2,775.00
27 8" Gate Valve & Box EA 14 $800.00 $11,200.00
28 6" Gate Valve & Box EA 8 $675.00 $5,400.00
29 Cut in 10" X 8" DIP Tee EA 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00
30 DIP Fittings LB 6,000 $2.50 $15,000.00
31 Install Salvaged Hydrant EA 5 $600.00 $3,000.00
32 Install Salvaged Gate Valve & Box EA 5 $300.00 $1,500.00
33 Hydrant Riser LF 12 $250.00 $3,000.00
34 Valve Box Extension LF 15 $70.00 $1,050.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT COST
$235,865.00
$23,586.50
$259,451.50
$77,835.45
$337,286.95
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 1 of 7
Total
Item
No. Description
Estimated
Unit
Unit
_ Quantity
Price
Total
NEW IMPROVEMENTS
SANITARY SEWER
1 Mobilization LS 1 $8,100.00 $8,100.00
2 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole EA 2 $750.00 $1,500.00
3 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer EA 3 $500.00 $1,500.00
4 12" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (18' -20' deep) LF 132 $36.00 $4,752.00
5 10" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (16' -18' deep) LF 458 $32.00 $14,656.00
6 10" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (18' -20' deep) LF 1,024 $34.50 $35,328.00
7 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 35 (10' -12' deep) LF 1,654 $20.00 $33,080.00
8 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 35 (12' -14' deep) LF 229 $23.50 $5,381.50
9 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 35 (14' -16' deep) LF 195 $26.00 $5,070.00
10 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (16' -18' deep) LF 50 $28.00 $1,400.00
11 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, SDR 26 (18' -20' deep) LF 340 $30.00 $10,200.00
12 Standard Sanitary MH (0 -8' deep) EA 21 $1,425.00 $29,925.00
13 Extra Depth Sanitary MH LF 123 $100.00 $12,300.00
14 Televise Sanitary Sewer LF 4,082 $0.60 $2,449.20
15 Improved Pipe Foundation Material LF 2,000 $2.00 $4,000.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT COST
$169,641.70
$16,964.17
$186,605.87
$55,981.76
$242,587.63
WATER MAIN
16 Mobilization LS 1 $11,200.00 $11,200.00
17 Salvage Hydrant EA 5 $600.00 $3,000.00
18 Salvage Gate Valve & Box EA 5 $300.00 $1,500.00
19 Connect to Existing Water Main EA 6 $700.00 $4,200.00
20 12" DIP Water Main, Class 52 LF 1,250 $28.00 $35,000.00
21 10" DIP Water Main, Class 52 LF 1,830 $26.00 $47,580.00
22 8" DIP Water Main, Class 52 LF 2,980 $22.00 $65,560.00
23 6" DIP Water Main, Class 52 LF 200 $18.00 $3,600.00
24 Furnish & Install Hydrant EA 8 $1,800.00 $14,400.00
25 12" Gate Valve & Box EA 3 $1,100.00 $3,300.00
26 10" Gate Valve & Box EA 3 $925.00 $2,775.00
27 8" Gate Valve & Box EA 14 $800.00 $11,200.00
28 6" Gate Valve & Box EA 8 $675.00 $5,400.00
29 Cut in 10" X 8" DIP Tee EA 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00
30 DIP Fittings LB 6,000 $2.50 $15,000.00
31 Install Salvaged Hydrant EA 5 $600.00 $3,000.00
32 Install Salvaged Gate Valve & Box EA 5 $300.00 $1,500.00
33 Hydrant Riser LF 12 $250.00 $3,000.00
34 Valve Box Extension LF 15 $70.00 $1,050.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT COST
$235,865.00
$23,586.50
$259,451.50
$77,835.45
$337,286.95
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 1 of 7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy At Woods Edge
A -LI NOL0305.02
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
STORM SEWER
35 Mobilization LS 1 $21,500.00 $21,500.00
36 15" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 3,238 $26.00 $84,188.00
37 18" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 1,333 $28.00 $37,324.00
38 21" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 438 $30.00 $13,140.00
39 24" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 299 $32.00 $9,568.00
40 27" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 193 $36.00 $6,948.00
41 30" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 30 $40.00 $1,200.00
42 15" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
43 18" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00
44 21" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
45 30" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
46 Standard 4' Storm CBMH EA 21 $1,000.00 $21,000.00
47 Standard 4' Storm MH EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
48 Standard 5' Storm CBMH EA 11 $1,200.00 $13,200.00
49 Standard 5' Storm MH EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
50 Standard 7' Storm MH EA 2 $1,750.00 $3,500.00
51 Standard 2'x3' Precast CB EA 13 $750.00 $9,750.00
52 Underground Stormwater Chamber CY 4,860 $40.00 $194,400.00
53 Casting Assembly CB, R -3067V EACH 43 $320.00 $13,760.00
54 Casting Assembly CB, R -3290A EACH 2 $320.00 $640.00
55 Casting Assembly MH, R -1642B EACH 4 $320.00 $1,280.00
56 Improved Pipe Foundation Material LF 350 $2.00 $700.00
57 Grade Emergency Overflow Swale EA 1 $500.00 $500.00
58 Random Rip Rap, Cl. III CY 68 $60.00 $4,080.00
59 Silt Fence LF 500 $2.00 $1,000.00
60 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor AC 2.0 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
61 Seeding, incl. Seed, Fertilizer and Wood Fiber Blanket SY 500 $3.50 $1,750.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT COST
$452,528.00
$45,252.80
$497,780.80
$149,334.24
$647,115.04
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
62 Mobilization LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00
63 Salvage Barricade EA 4 $150.00 $600.00
64 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CY 8,900 $13.00 $115,700.00
65 Aggregate Base, Class 5 T 8,970 $9.50 $85,215.00
66 Type LV Non - wearing Course Mixture T 1,780 $32.00 $56,960.00
67 Type LV Wearing Course Mixture T 1,780 $35.00 $62,300.00
68 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL 1,200 $1.50 $1,800.00
69 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 8,280 $8.00 $66,240.00
70 D424 Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 1,000 $8.50 $8,500.00
71 5" Concrete Sidewalk SF 21,600 $3.00 $64,800.00
72 6" Concrete Walk for Pedestrian Curb Ramp SF 910 $5.10 $4,641.00
73 Modular Block Retaining Wall SF 8,800 $16.00 $140,800.00
74 F &I Street Name Signs (2) EA 6 $300.00 $1,800.00
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 2 of 7
Total
IItem
No. Description
Estimated
Unit
Unit
Quantity
Price
Total
STORM SEWER
35 Mobilization LS 1 $21,500.00 $21,500.00
36 15" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 3,238 $26.00 $84,188.00
37 18" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 1,333 $28.00 $37,324.00
38 21" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 438 $30.00 $13,140.00
39 24" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 299 $32.00 $9,568.00
40 27" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 193 $36.00 $6,948.00
41 30" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 30 $40.00 $1,200.00
42 15" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
43 18" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00
44 21" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
45 30" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
46 Standard 4' Storm CBMH EA 21 $1,000.00 $21,000.00
47 Standard 4' Storm MH EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
48 Standard 5' Storm CBMH EA 11 $1,200.00 $13,200.00
49 Standard 5' Storm MH EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
50 Standard 7' Storm MH EA 2 $1,750.00 $3,500.00
51 Standard 2'x3' Precast CB EA 13 $750.00 $9,750.00
52 Underground Stormwater Chamber CY 4,860 $40.00 $194,400.00
53 Casting Assembly CB, R -3067V EACH 43 $320.00 $13,760.00
54 Casting Assembly CB, R -3290A EACH 2 $320.00 $640.00
55 Casting Assembly MH, R -1642B EACH 4 $320.00 $1,280.00
56 Improved Pipe Foundation Material LF 350 $2.00 $700.00
57 Grade Emergency Overflow Swale EA 1 $500.00 $500.00
58 Random Rip Rap, Cl. III CY 68 $60.00 $4,080.00
59 Silt Fence LF 500 $2.00 $1,000.00
60 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor AC 2.0 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
61 Seeding, incl. Seed, Fertilizer and Wood Fiber Blanket SY 500 $3.50 $1,750.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT COST
$452,528.00
$45,252.80
$497,780.80
$149,334.24
$647,115.04
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
62 Mobilization LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00
63 Salvage Barricade EA 4 $150.00 $600.00
64 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CY 8,900 $13.00 $115,700.00
65 Aggregate Base, Class 5 T 8,970 $9.50 $85,215.00
66 Type LV Non - wearing Course Mixture T 1,780 $32.00 $56,960.00
67 Type LV Wearing Course Mixture T 1,780 $35.00 $62,300.00
68 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL 1,200 $1.50 $1,800.00
69 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 8,280 $8.00 $66,240.00
70 D424 Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 1,000 $8.50 $8,500.00
71 5" Concrete Sidewalk SF 21,600 $3.00 $64,800.00
72 6" Concrete Walk for Pedestrian Curb Ramp SF 910 $5.10 $4,641.00
73 Modular Block Retaining Wall SF 8,800 $16.00 $140,800.00
74 F &I Street Name Signs (2) EA 6 $300.00 $1,800.00
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 2 of 7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy At Woods Edge
A -LI NOL0305.02
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
75 F &I Sign Panels, Type C
76 Handicap Parking Symbol - Epoxy
77 4" Solid White - Paint
78 Pavement Message - Left Arrow - Epoxy
79 Pavement Message - Right Arrow - Epoxy
80 4" PVC, Sch. 40 Draintile
81 4" PVC, Sch. 40, Conduit for Private Utility Crossing
82 4" PVC, Sch. 40, 1 Conduit for Irrigation Crossing
83 Street Sweeper with Pick -up Broom with Operator
84 Skidsteer (bobcat) with Operator
85 Silt Fence
86 Sodding, Incl. 4" Topsoil
87 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT COST
SF
EA
LF
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
HR
HR
LF
SY
AC
1,200 $28.50 $34,200.00
6 $150.00 $900.00
3,300 $1.00 $3,300.00
1 $120.00 $120.00
11 $120.00 $1,320.00
1,400 $6.00 $8,400.00
2,080 $5.25 $10,920.00
1,120 $5.25 $5,880.00
20 $110.00 $2,200.00
20 $75.00 $1,500.00
2,600 $3.00 $7,800.00
5,000 $3.50 $17,500.00
2.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
$741,396.00
$74,139.60
$815,535.60
$244,660.68
$1,060,196.28
STREET LIGHTING
88 Mobilization LS 1 $30,500.00 $30,500.00
89 Street Lighting EA 111 $5,500.00 $610,500.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING COST
$641,000.00
$64,100.00
$705,100.00
$211,530.00
$916,630.00
STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
90 Mobilization LS 1 $41,500.00 $41,500.00
91 Concrete w/ Decorative Scoring SF 46,240 $4.00 $184,960.00
92 Concrete Paver SF 22,500 $5.50 $123,750.00
93 Median Concrete SF 3,800 $2.50 $9,500.00
94 Structural Soil CY 1,400 $35.00 $49,000.00
95 Planter Curb LF 3,130 $12.00 $37,560.00
96 Bench EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00
97 Bollard EA $1,200.00
98 Bicycle Loops EA 12 $400.00 $4,800.00
99 Kiosk EA 2 $35,000.00 $70,000.00
100 Trash Receptacle EA 15 $1,000.00 $15,000.00
101 Tree Grate EA 48 $1,600.00 $76,800.00
102 Planter Pot EA 18 $1,000.00 $18,000.00
103 Planter Tree EA 42 $400.00 $16,800.00
104 Shrub Bed in Planter SY 2,175 $50.00 $108,750.00
105 Planter Mulch CY 240 $35.00 $8,400.00
106 Street Tree EA 126 $400.00 $50,400.00
107 Coniferous Tree EA 16 $350.00 $5,600.00
108 Boulevard Tree EA 56 $400.00 $22,400.00
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 3 of 7
Total
Item
No. Description
Estimated
Unit
Unit
Quantity
Price
Total
75 F &I Sign Panels, Type C
76 Handicap Parking Symbol - Epoxy
77 4" Solid White - Paint
78 Pavement Message - Left Arrow - Epoxy
79 Pavement Message - Right Arrow - Epoxy
80 4" PVC, Sch. 40 Draintile
81 4" PVC, Sch. 40, Conduit for Private Utility Crossing
82 4" PVC, Sch. 40, 1 Conduit for Irrigation Crossing
83 Street Sweeper with Pick -up Broom with Operator
84 Skidsteer (bobcat) with Operator
85 Silt Fence
86 Sodding, Incl. 4" Topsoil
87 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT COST
SF
EA
LF
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
HR
HR
LF
SY
AC
1,200 $28.50 $34,200.00
6 $150.00 $900.00
3,300 $1.00 $3,300.00
1 $120.00 $120.00
11 $120.00 $1,320.00
1,400 $6.00 $8,400.00
2,080 $5.25 $10,920.00
1,120 $5.25 $5,880.00
20 $110.00 $2,200.00
20 $75.00 $1,500.00
2,600 $3.00 $7,800.00
5,000 $3.50 $17,500.00
2.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
$741,396.00
$74,139.60
$815,535.60
$244,660.68
$1,060,196.28
STREET LIGHTING
88 Mobilization LS 1 $30,500.00 $30,500.00
89 Street Lighting EA 111 $5,500.00 $610,500.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING COST
$641,000.00
$64,100.00
$705,100.00
$211,530.00
$916,630.00
STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
90 Mobilization LS 1 $41,500.00 $41,500.00
91 Concrete w/ Decorative Scoring SF 46,240 $4.00 $184,960.00
92 Concrete Paver SF 22,500 $5.50 $123,750.00
93 Median Concrete SF 3,800 $2.50 $9,500.00
94 Structural Soil CY 1,400 $35.00 $49,000.00
95 Planter Curb LF 3,130 $12.00 $37,560.00
96 Bench EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00
97 Bollard EA $1,200.00
98 Bicycle Loops EA 12 $400.00 $4,800.00
99 Kiosk EA 2 $35,000.00 $70,000.00
100 Trash Receptacle EA 15 $1,000.00 $15,000.00
101 Tree Grate EA 48 $1,600.00 $76,800.00
102 Planter Pot EA 18 $1,000.00 $18,000.00
103 Planter Tree EA 42 $400.00 $16,800.00
104 Shrub Bed in Planter SY 2,175 $50.00 $108,750.00
105 Planter Mulch CY 240 $35.00 $8,400.00
106 Street Tree EA 126 $400.00 $50,400.00
107 Coniferous Tree EA 16 $350.00 $5,600.00
108 Boulevard Tree EA 56 $400.00 $22,400.00
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 3 of 7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy At Woods Edge
A -LI NOL0305.02
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
109 Ornamental Tree
110 Potting Soil for Planter
111 Topsoil Borrow
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT COST
EA
CY
CY
5 $250.00 $1,250.00
650 $12.00 $7,800.00
880 $12.00 $10,560.00
$871,830.00
$87,183.00
$959,013.00
$287,703.90
$1,246,716.90
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 4 of 7
Total
Item
No. Description
Estimated
Unit
Unit
Quantity
Price
Total
109 Ornamental Tree
110 Potting Soil for Planter
111 Topsoil Borrow
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT COST
EA
CY
CY
5 $250.00 $1,250.00
650 $12.00 $7,800.00
880 $12.00 $10,560.00
$871,830.00
$87,183.00
$959,013.00
$287,703.90
$1,246,716.90
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 4 of 7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy At Woods Edge
A -LI NOL0305.02
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
COMMUNITY GREEN IMPROVEMENTS
112 Mobilization
113 Concrete w/ Decorative Scoring
114 Concrete Paver
115 Structural Soil
116 Planter Curb
117 Interactive Water Feature
118 Performance Canopy - Pergola
119 Bench
120 Bollard
121 Bicycle Loops
122 Trash Receptacle
123 Tree Grate
124 Planter Pot
125 Street Tree
126 Planter Tree
127 Coniferous Tree
128 Potting Soil for Planter
129 Shrub Bed in Planter
130 Planter Mulch
131 Topsoil Borrow
132 Sod
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL COMMUNITY GREEN IMPROVEMENT COST
PROJECT COST SUMMARY
Sanitary Sewer
Water Main
Storm Sewer
Street Improvements
Street Lighting
Streetscape Improvements
Community Green Improvements
LS 1 $19,600.00 $19,600.00
SF 9,645 $4.00 $38,580.00
SF 8,130 $5.50 $44,715.00
CY $35.00
LF 133 $12.00 $1,596.00
EA 6 $25,000.00 $150,000.00
EA 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
EA 16 $1,500.00 $24,000.00
EA $1,200.00
EA 10 $400.00 $4,000.00
EA 6 $1,000.00 $6,000.00
EA $1,600.00
EA $1,000.00
EA 41 $400.00 $16,400.00
EA 15 $400.00 $6,000.00
EA 5 $350.00 $1,750.00
CY 85 $10.00 $850.00
SY 200 $50.00 $10,000.00
CY 50 $35.00 $1,750.00
CY 220 $12.00 $2,640.00
SY 3,300 $3.00 $9,900.00
$412,781.00
$41,278.10
$454,059.10
$136,217.73
$590,276.83
$242,587.63
$337,286.95
$647,115.04
$1,060,196.28
$916,630.00
$1,246,716.90
$590,276.83
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (NEW CONSTRUCTION) $5,040,809.63
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 5 of 7
Total
Item
No. Description
Estimated
Unit
Unit
Quantity
Price
Total
COMMUNITY GREEN IMPROVEMENTS
112 Mobilization
113 Concrete w/ Decorative Scoring
114 Concrete Paver
115 Structural Soil
116 Planter Curb
117 Interactive Water Feature
118 Performance Canopy - Pergola
119 Bench
120 Bollard
121 Bicycle Loops
122 Trash Receptacle
123 Tree Grate
124 Planter Pot
125 Street Tree
126 Planter Tree
127 Coniferous Tree
128 Potting Soil for Planter
129 Shrub Bed in Planter
130 Planter Mulch
131 Topsoil Borrow
132 Sod
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL COMMUNITY GREEN IMPROVEMENT COST
PROJECT COST SUMMARY
Sanitary Sewer
Water Main
Storm Sewer
Street Improvements
Street Lighting
Streetscape Improvements
Community Green Improvements
LS 1 $19,600.00 $19,600.00
SF 9,645 $4.00 $38,580.00
SF 8,130 $5.50 $44,715.00
CY $35.00
LF 133 $12.00 $1,596.00
EA 6 $25,000.00 $150,000.00
EA 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
EA 16 $1,500.00 $24,000.00
EA $1,200.00
EA 10 $400.00 $4,000.00
EA 6 $1,000.00 $6,000.00
EA $1,600.00
EA $1,000.00
EA 41 $400.00 $16,400.00
EA 15 $400.00 $6,000.00
EA 5 $350.00 $1,750.00
CY 85 $10.00 $850.00
SY 200 $50.00 $10,000.00
CY 50 $35.00 $1,750.00
CY 220 $12.00 $2,640.00
SY 3,300 $3.00 $9,900.00
$412,781.00
$41,278.10
$454,059.10
$136,217.73
$590,276.83
$242,587.63
$337,286.95
$647,115.04
$1,060,196.28
$916,630.00
$1,246,716.90
$590,276.83
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (NEW CONSTRUCTION) $5,040,809.63
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 5 of 7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy At Woods Edge
A- LINOL0305.02
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
RECONSTRUCTION
STORM SEWER
1 Mobilization LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00
2 Remove Storm Sewer Pipe LF 1,500 $8.00 $12,000.00
3 Remove Drainage Structure EA 24 $500.00 $12,000.00
4 Salvage Casting Assembly EA 18 $300.00 $5,400.00
5 15" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 636 $26.00 $16,536.00
6 18" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 856 $28.00 $23,968.00
7 21" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 34 $30.00 $1,020.00
8 24" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 11 $32.00 $352.00
9 30" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 395 $40.00 $15,800.00
10 18" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00
11 30" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
12 Standard 4' Storm CBMH EA 10 $1,000.00 $10,000.00
13 Standard 4' Storm MH EA 5 $1,000.00 $5,000.00
14 Standard 5' Storm CBMH EA 4 $1,200.00 $4,800.00
15 Standard 5' Storm MH EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
16 Standard 2'x3' Precast CB EA 8 $750.00 $6,000.00
17 Casting Assembly CB, R -3067V EA 8 $320.00 $2,560.00
18 Casting Assembly MH, R -1642B EA 1 $320.00 $320.00
19 Install Salvaged Casting Assembly EA 18 $300.00 $5,400.00
20 Improved Pipe Foundation Material LF 250 $2.00 $500.00
21 Grade Emergency Overflow Swale EA 1 $500.00 $500.00
22 Random Rip Rap, Cl. III CY 68 $65.00 $4,420.00
23 Silt Fence LF 1,000 $2.00 $2,000.00
24 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor AC 1.50 $1,500.00 $2,250.00
25 Seeding, incl. Seed, Fertilizer and Wood Fiber Blanket SY 800 $3.50 $2,800.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT COST
$147,426.00
$14,742.60
$162,168.60
$48,650.58
$210,819.18
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
26 Mobilization LS 1 $19,100.00 $19,100.00
27 Traffic Control LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
28 Common Excavation (EV) CY 7,600 $8.00 $60,800.00
29 Sidewalk Excavation (EV) CY 440 $11.50 $5,060.00
30 Sawcut Bituminous Pavement LF 285 $3.50 $997.50
31 Remove Bituminous Pavement SY 4,940 $2.50 $12,350.00
32 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CY 2,380 $13.00 $30,940.00
33 Aggregate Base, Class 5 T 5,200 $9.50 $49,400.00
34 Aggregate Base, Class 5 - Sidewalk T 500 $12.00 $6,000.00
35 Adjust MH Casting EA 20 $250.00 $5,000.00
36 Adjust GV Box EA 28 $150.00 $4,200.00
37 Type LV Non - wearing Course Mixture T 1,100 $32.00 $35,200.00
38 Type MV Wearing Course Mixture T 1,100 $35.00 $38,500.00
39 Bituminous Trail T 280 $35.00 $9,800.00
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 6 of 7
Total
IItem
No. Description
Estimated
Unit
Unit
Quantity
Price
Total
RECONSTRUCTION
STORM SEWER
1 Mobilization LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00
2 Remove Storm Sewer Pipe LF 1,500 $8.00 $12,000.00
3 Remove Drainage Structure EA 24 $500.00 $12,000.00
4 Salvage Casting Assembly EA 18 $300.00 $5,400.00
5 15" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 636 $26.00 $16,536.00
6 18" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 856 $28.00 $23,968.00
7 21" RCP Storm Sewer, Class V LF 34 $30.00 $1,020.00
8 24" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 11 $32.00 $352.00
9 30" RCP Storm Sewer, Class III LF 395 $40.00 $15,800.00
10 18" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00
11 30" RC Pipe Apron W/ Trash Guard EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
12 Standard 4' Storm CBMH EA 10 $1,000.00 $10,000.00
13 Standard 4' Storm MH EA 5 $1,000.00 $5,000.00
14 Standard 5' Storm CBMH EA 4 $1,200.00 $4,800.00
15 Standard 5' Storm MH EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
16 Standard 2'x3' Precast CB EA 8 $750.00 $6,000.00
17 Casting Assembly CB, R -3067V EA 8 $320.00 $2,560.00
18 Casting Assembly MH, R -1642B EA 1 $320.00 $320.00
19 Install Salvaged Casting Assembly EA 18 $300.00 $5,400.00
20 Improved Pipe Foundation Material LF 250 $2.00 $500.00
21 Grade Emergency Overflow Swale EA 1 $500.00 $500.00
22 Random Rip Rap, Cl. III CY 68 $65.00 $4,420.00
23 Silt Fence LF 1,000 $2.00 $2,000.00
24 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor AC 1.50 $1,500.00 $2,250.00
25 Seeding, incl. Seed, Fertilizer and Wood Fiber Blanket SY 800 $3.50 $2,800.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT COST
$147,426.00
$14,742.60
$162,168.60
$48,650.58
$210,819.18
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
26 Mobilization LS 1 $19,100.00 $19,100.00
27 Traffic Control LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
28 Common Excavation (EV) CY 7,600 $8.00 $60,800.00
29 Sidewalk Excavation (EV) CY 440 $11.50 $5,060.00
30 Sawcut Bituminous Pavement LF 285 $3.50 $997.50
31 Remove Bituminous Pavement SY 4,940 $2.50 $12,350.00
32 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CY 2,380 $13.00 $30,940.00
33 Aggregate Base, Class 5 T 5,200 $9.50 $49,400.00
34 Aggregate Base, Class 5 - Sidewalk T 500 $12.00 $6,000.00
35 Adjust MH Casting EA 20 $250.00 $5,000.00
36 Adjust GV Box EA 28 $150.00 $4,200.00
37 Type LV Non - wearing Course Mixture T 1,100 $32.00 $35,200.00
38 Type MV Wearing Course Mixture T 1,100 $35.00 $38,500.00
39 Bituminous Trail T 280 $35.00 $9,800.00
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 6 of 7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy At Woods Edge
A- LINOL0305.02
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
40 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
41 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter
42 6" Concrete Walk for Pedestrian Curb Ramp
43 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter
44 Remove Concrete Sidewalk
45 F &I Street Name Signs (2)
46 F &I Sign Panels, Type C
47 Handicap Parking Symbol - Epoxy
48 4" Solid White - Paint
49 Pavement Message - Left Arrow - Epoxy
50 Pavement Message - Right Arrow - Epoxy
51 4" PVC, Sch. 40 Draintile
52 4" PVC, Sch. 40, Conduit for Private Utility Crossing
53 4" PVC, Sch. 40, 1 Conduit for Irrigation Crossing
54 Street Sweeper with Pick -up Broom with Operator
55 Skidsteer (bobcat) with Operator
56 Silt Fence
57 Sodding, Incl. 4" Topsoil
58 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT COST
RECONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY
Storm Sewer
Street Improvements
GAL
LF
SF
LF
SF
EA
SF
EA
LF
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
HR
HR
LF
SY
AC
950 $1.50 $1,425.00
5,070 $8.00 $40,560.00
910 $5.10 $4,641.00
3,600 $3.50 $12,600.00
11,800 $0.60 $7,080.00
2 $300.00 $600.00
300.0 $28.50 $8,550.00
4 $150.00 $600.00
1,000 $1.00 $1,000.00
2 $120.00 $240.00
1 $120.00 $120.00
400 $6.00 $2,400.00
1,200 $5.25 $6,300.00
400 $5.25 $2,100.00
20 $110.00 $2,200.00
20 $75.00 $1,500.00
1,500 $3.00 $4,500.00
6,000 $3.50 $21,000.00
1.0 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
$401,263.50
$40,126.35
$441,389.85
$132,416.96
$573,806.81
$210,819.18
$573,806.81
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (RECONSTRUCTION) $784,625.99
PROJECT COST SUMMARY
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (NEW CONSTRUCTION)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (RECONSTRUCTION)
$5,040,809.63
$784.625.99
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $5,825,435.62
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 7 of 7
Total
Item
No. Description
Estimated
Unit
Unit
Quantity
Price
Total
40 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
41 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter
42 6" Concrete Walk for Pedestrian Curb Ramp
43 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter
44 Remove Concrete Sidewalk
45 F &I Street Name Signs (2)
46 F &I Sign Panels, Type C
47 Handicap Parking Symbol - Epoxy
48 4" Solid White - Paint
49 Pavement Message - Left Arrow - Epoxy
50 Pavement Message - Right Arrow - Epoxy
51 4" PVC, Sch. 40 Draintile
52 4" PVC, Sch. 40, Conduit for Private Utility Crossing
53 4" PVC, Sch. 40, 1 Conduit for Irrigation Crossing
54 Street Sweeper with Pick -up Broom with Operator
55 Skidsteer (bobcat) with Operator
56 Silt Fence
57 Sodding, Incl. 4" Topsoil
58 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT COST
RECONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY
Storm Sewer
Street Improvements
GAL
LF
SF
LF
SF
EA
SF
EA
LF
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
HR
HR
LF
SY
AC
950 $1.50 $1,425.00
5,070 $8.00 $40,560.00
910 $5.10 $4,641.00
3,600 $3.50 $12,600.00
11,800 $0.60 $7,080.00
2 $300.00 $600.00
300.0 $28.50 $8,550.00
4 $150.00 $600.00
1,000 $1.00 $1,000.00
2 $120.00 $240.00
1 $120.00 $120.00
400 $6.00 $2,400.00
1,200 $5.25 $6,300.00
400 $5.25 $2,100.00
20 $110.00 $2,200.00
20 $75.00 $1,500.00
1,500 $3.00 $4,500.00
6,000 $3.50 $21,000.00
1.0 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
$401,263.50
$40,126.35
$441,389.85
$132,416.96
$573,806.81
$210,819.18
$573,806.81
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (RECONSTRUCTION) $784,625.99
PROJECT COST SUMMARY
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (NEW CONSTRUCTION)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (RECONSTRUCTION)
$5,040,809.63
$784.625.99
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $5,825,435.62
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 7 of 7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy at Woods Edge
A -LI NOL0305.02
PHELIMINAHY ES1IMA1t
Total
Item
No. Description
Estimated
Unit
Unit
Quantity
Price
Total
LAKE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
1 Mobilization
2 Traffic Control
3 Common Excavation
4 Concrete Removal
5 Select Granular Borrow (CV)
6 Aggregate Base, Class 5
7 Type LV Non - wearing Course Mixture
8 Type LV Wearing Course Mixture
9 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
10 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter
11 D424 Concrete Curb and Gutter
12 5" Concrete Sidewalk
13 Storm Sewer
14 Full- Actuated Traffic Signal (Permanent)
15 Full- Actuated Traffic Signal (Temporary)
16 Traffic Signal Interconnection
17 F &I Sign Panels, Type C
18 4" Solid White or Yellow Pavement Marking - Epoxy
19 Pavement Message - Left Arrow - Epoxy
20 Pavement Message - Right Arrow - Epoxy
21 Street Sweeper with Pick -up Broom with Operator
22 Skidsteer (bobcat) with Operator
23 Silt Fence
24 Sodding, Incl. 4" Topsoil
25 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL LAKE DRIVE IMPROVEMENT COST
LS
LS
CY
CY
CY
T
T
T
GAL
LF
LF
SF
LS
LS
LS
LS
SF
LF
EA
EA
HR
HR
LF
SY
AC
1 $71,900.00 $71,900.00
1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
15,000 $6.50 $97,500.00
800 $25.00 $20,000.00
3,670 $13.00 $47,710.00
5,850 $9.50 $55,575.00
2,550 $32.00 $81,600.00
1,275 $35.00 $44,625.00
1,200 $1.50 $1,800.00
4,500 $8.00 $36,000.00
500 $8.50 $4,250.00
13,500 $3.00 $40,500.00
1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00
1 $300,000.00 $300,000.00
2 $250,000.00 $500,000.00
1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
1,200 $28.50 $34,200.00
3,200 $1.50 $4,800.00
5 $120.00 $600.00
6 $120.00 $720.00
20 $110.00 $2,200.00
20 $75.00 $1,500.00
2,600 $3.00 $7,800.00
6,700 $3.00 $20,100.00
2.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
$1,511,380.00
$151,138.00
$1,662,518.00
$498,755.40
$2,161,273.40
FREEWAY RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
1 Mobilization LS 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00
2 Traffic Control LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
3 Common Excavation CY 2,500 $6.50 $16,250.00
4 Concrete Removal CY 600 $25.00 $15,000.00
5 Select Granular Borrow (CV) CY 1,155 $13.00 $15,015.00
6 Aggregate Base, Class 5 T 1,600 $9.50 $15,200.00
7 Type LV Non - wearing Course Mixture T 800 $32.00 $25,600.00
8 Type LV Wearing Course Mixture T 400 $35.00 $14,000.00
9 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL 360 $1.50 $540.00
10 D424 Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 2,000 $8.50 $17,000.00
11 F &I Sign Panels, Type C SF 500 $28.50 $14,250.00
12 Silt Fence LF 2,000 $3.00 $6,000.00
13 Sodding, Incl. 4" Topsoil SY 1,300 $3.00 $3,900.00
14 Seeding, incl. Seed, Mulch and Disk Anchor AC 1.50 $1,500.00 $2,250.00
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL FREEWAY RAMP IMPROVEMENTS COST
PROJECT COST SUMMARY
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (LAKE DRIVE)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (FREEWAY RAMPS)
$168,005.00
$16,800.50
$184,805.50
$55,441.65
$240,247.15
$2,161,273.40
$240,247.15
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $2,401,520.55
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04) Page 1 of 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy at Woods Edge
A -LI N OL0305.02
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
I35 -W WATER MAIN LOOP
1 Mobilization
2 Connect to Existing Water Main
3 12" DIP Water Main, Class 52
4 8" DIP Water Main, Class 52
5 14" HDPE Water Main, Directionally Drilled
6 24" HDPE Casing, Directionally Drilled
7 MJ Adaptor
8 12" Gate Valve & Box
9 DIP Fittings
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL TRUNK WATER MAIN COST
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04)
LS
EA
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
LB
1 $5,200.00 $5,200.00
1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
280 $28.00 $7,840.00
20 $25.00 $500.00
340 $75.00 $25,500.00
300 $200.00 $60,000.00
2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00
1,000 $3.00 $3,000.00
$108,440.00
$10,844.00
$119,284.00
$35,785.20
$155,069.20
Page 1 of 1
Total
Item
No. Description
Estimated
Unit
Unit
Quantity
Price
Total
I35 -W WATER MAIN LOOP
1 Mobilization
2 Connect to Existing Water Main
3 12" DIP Water Main, Class 52
4 8" DIP Water Main, Class 52
5 14" HDPE Water Main, Directionally Drilled
6 24" HDPE Casing, Directionally Drilled
7 MJ Adaptor
8 12" Gate Valve & Box
9 DIP Fittings
Subtotal Construction Cost
+ 10 % Construction Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
+ 30% Eng., Legal, Admin.
TOTAL TRUNK WATER MAIN COST
6/10/04
Construction Cost Summary (rev 6 -1 -04)
LS
EA
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
LB
1 $5,200.00 $5,200.00
1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
280 $28.00 $7,840.00
20 $25.00 $500.00
340 $75.00 $25,500.00
300 $200.00 $60,000.00
2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00
1,000 $3.00 $3,000.00
$108,440.00
$10,844.00
$119,284.00
$35,785.20
$155,069.20
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA ITEM 6J
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 14, 2004
TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Easement Vacation
FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 03 - 04, Vacating Drainage and Utility
Easements and Accepting New Easements, Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Brook
Peninsula
VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 VOTE REQUIRED
BACKGROUND:
City Staff is currently working with the applicant and the adjacent property owners of
Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Brook Peninsula regarding the vacation and acceptance of
drainage and utility easements. Meetings between City Staff and the property owners
continue to take place.
City Staff is waiting for an engineers review response from the Rice Creek
Watershed District on this matter before making a recommendation to the City
Council. We are requesting that the Public Hearing be continued to the June 28,
2004 City Council meeting.
OPTIONS:
1. Continue the Public Hearing to the June 28, 2004 City Council.
2. Return to staff for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Option 1.