HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/26/2004 Council Packet•
AMENDED AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday,
July 26, 2004
Council Chambers
City Council meeting
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
Open Mike
Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
1. Consent Agenda -
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) July 26, 2004 (Check No. 71471 through 71578 in the amount of
$990,514.97). Pg. 5 -15
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14363 through 14375 in the
amount of $56,013.69). Pg. 16
2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek
A) None.
3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A) Update Personnel Policy — Severance Policy Pg. 17
B) Conditional Offer of Employment — Public Safety Department
Pg. 17A
4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
A) Consider renewal of Otter Lake Animal Control Contract
Pg. 18-22
5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
AMENDED AGENDA
A) None.
6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala
A) Public Hearing, Consider 1St Reading of Ordinance 03 -04, Vacating
Drainage and Utility Easements and Accepting New Easements, Lot 2,
Block 1, Oak Brook Peninsula, Jim Studenski (Continue Public Hearing
to August 12, 2004 City Council Meeting) Pg. 23
B) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 20 -04 offering sale of property to
Legacy Holdings Lino Lakes, LLC, Mary Divine Pg. 24 -27
C) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -111, Authorizing Execution of Anoka
County Solid Waste Agreement, Marty Asleson Pg. 28 -37
D) West Shadow Ponds 2"t Addition, Dick Thompson, TKDA
i. Consider 1
Real Estate to R 1X, Single Family Executive
ii. Consideration of Resolution Ne. 01 XX, Approving Preliminary
Plat and MUSA Allocation
E) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -108, Approving Final Plat, Elm Street
Estates (formerly Lake View Estates), Jeff Smyser Pg. 38 -40
F) Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition, Jeff Smyser
i. Consider 1St Reading of Ordinance No. 10 -04, Rezoning Certain
Real Estate from R -1, Single Family Residence to R -3, Medium
Density Residential
ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -57, Approving Preliminary
Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development
iii. Public Hearing, Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 08 -04,
Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement, Outlot A, Highland
Meadows East Pg. 41 -76
G) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -110, Approving Variance to Reduce
the Required Side Yard Setback, 6396 Langer Lane, Paul Bengtson
Pg. 77 -82
H) Consideration of Second Reading, Ordinance No. 18 -04, Rezoning Certain
Real Estate to R -1X, Single Family Executive, Junes Addition, Jeff
Smyser Pg. 83 -85
Page 2
•
•
•
AMENDED AGENDA
Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -104, Approving Development
Agreement, Marshan Estates, Jim Studenski Pg. 86 -101
J) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -98, Awarding Contract, Marshan
Lane Utility Improvement Project, Jim Studenski Pg. 102 -103
K) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -105, Approving Payment No. 3, 2003
and Change Order No. 1, 2003 Surface Water Management Project, Jim
Studenski Pg. 104-111
L) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -106, Accepting Bids and Awarding
Contract, Holly Drive Improvement Project, Jim Studenski
Pg. 112-120
M) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -107, Approving Payment No. 3, 2003
and Change Order No. 2, 21st Avenue Improvement Project, Jim Studenski
Pg. 121-127
7. Unfinished Business
A Approval of minutes of March 25, 2001 Special Council Meeting, Team
Building
l) Approval of minutes of May 22, 2001 Special C -ouncil Meeting, Goals
Setting
8. New Business
A) Approval of minutes of June 9, 2001 Council Work Session
B) Approval of minutes of June 14, 2004 City Council Meeting
C) Approval of minutes of June 28, 2004 City Council Meeting
D) Approval of minutes of July 7, 2004 Council Work Session
E) Approval of minutes of July 12, 2004 City Council Meeting
9. Community Calendar, July 27, 2004 through August 9, 2004:
A) Environmental Board Meeting, Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 6:30 p.m.
B) Park Board Meeting, Monday, August 2, 2004, 6:30 p.m.
Page 3
•
•
•
AMENDED AGENDA
C) National Night Out, Tuesday, August 3, 2004
D) Council Work Session, Wednesday, August 4, 2004, 5:30 p.m.
E) EDAC Meeting, Thursday, August 5, 2004, 7:00 a.m.
F) City Council Meeting, Monday, August 9, 2004, 6:30 p.m.
10. Adjourn
Revised 07/22/04 jmv 3:50 p.m.
Page 4
•
EXPENDITURES
JULY 26, 2004
•
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:13:01 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
es
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 4063 4063
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 1 17.04 17.04 .00 .00
000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 451.19 451.19 .00 .00
000103 ONVOY, INC. 1 47.50 47.50 .00 .00
000158 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 2 598.50 598.50 .00 .00
000160 ALLIED BLACKTOP, INC. 1 58,717.41 58,717.41 .00 .00
000257 HAYNES, TRICIA 1 325.00 325.00 .00 .00
000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 2 308.87 308.87 .00 .00
000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 85.00 85.00 .00 .00
000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 86.87 86.87 .00 .00
0003250 JOHNSON, KEVIN 1 173.97 173.97 .00 .00
ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 1 266.25 266.25 .00 .00
000486 COORDINATED BUSINESS SYSTEMS, LTD. 1 493.65 493.65 .00 .00
000539 TARGET 1 117.83 117.83 .00 .00
000558 BACCHUS HOMES, INC. 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00
000675 BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, INC. 2 258.44 258.44 .00 .00
000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 145.88 145.88 .00 .00
000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 203.42 203.42 .00 .00
000769 EXCELSIOR, CITY OF 1 54.00 54.00 .00 .00
000796 EMILY, MARVIN A. & DONNA M. 1 17,750.00 17,750.00 .00 .00
000810 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 3 3,731.18 3,731.18 .00 .00
000833 BROCK WHITE, INC. 1 283.29 283.29 .00 .00
000861 BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SERVICE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:13:01 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
•
Name
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000888 JOHNSON, RICK 1 90.00 90.00 .00 .00
000891. ZYLSTRA HARLEY - DAVIDSON, INC. 1 798.07 798.07 .00 .00
000900 W E LAHR COMPANY 1 793.13 793.13 .00 .00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 181.31 181.31 .00 .00
000984 CONTRACT HARDWARE 1 3,390.00 3,390.00 .00 .00
000990 NEW HOLLAND PLAN 1 169.11 169.11 .00 .00.
000999 LANGER'S TREE SERVICE 1 1,592.18 1,592.18 .00 .00
001015 ALEXANDER, MARY 1 52.00 52.00 .00 .00
001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 109,755.75 109,755.75 .00 .00
001044 CHOICEPOINT SERVICES, INC. 1 104.00 104.00 .00 .00
001062 CULLIGAN, BOTTLED WATER, INC. 1 74.62 74.62 .00 .00
001072 GAMETIME 1 433.43 433.43 .00 .00
001081 GISKE CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 1 1,612.50 1,612.50 .00 .00
001091 BACHMAN, WARREN & SHELLY 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 .00 .00
001092 CENTRAL MINNESOTA GARAGE DOOR, INC. 1 29.75 29.75 .00 .00
GERRY, SONDRA 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
001111 HOBLE, CHRISTOPHER 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
001117 CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE 1- 880.00 880.00 .00 .00
001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER, INC 1 63.90 63.90 .00 .00
001260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 1 144.20 144.20 .00 .00
001280 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 601.73 601.73 .00 .00
001292 DERN OIL COMPANY, INC. 3 7,295.65 7,295.65 .00 .00
001309 MILLER, ROSE 1 34.00 34.00 .00 .00
001350 E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. 1 394.37 394.37 .00 .00
001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 837.39 837.39 .00 .00
001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 5,899.91 5,899.91 .00 .00
001526 NELSON, CAROL 1 33.00 33.00 .00 .00
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:13:02 City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page:
FM Entry Invoice Journal
.#
Name
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 2 72.17 72.17 .00 .00
001540 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. 1 92.07 92.07 .00 .00
001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 147.53 147.53 .00 .00
001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3 641.15 641.15 .00 .00
001720 GRAINGER, INC. 1 101.27 101.27 .00 .00
001771 HALVORSON CONCRETE, INC. 1 5,639.00 5,639.00 .00 .00
001842 SEMPLE EXCAVATING & TRUCKING, INC. 1 3,688.44 3,688.44 .00 .00
001854 RAUSCH, RONALD 1 8.00 8.00 .00 .00
001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 922.25 922.25 .00 .00
001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 2 80.26 80.26 .00 .00
001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 647.50 647.50 .00 .00
002107 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLIES, INC. 1 5.40 5.40 .00 .00
002110 KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. 1 52.61 52.61 .00 .00
002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 53.51 53.51 .00 .00
002178 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 1,315.45 1,315.45 .00 .00
8 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR & CO., LLP 1 7,900.00 7,900.00 .00 .00
0 28 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 18.26 18.26 .00 .00
002331 MCTREE FARM 1 179.99 179.99 .00 .00
002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 47.45 47.45 .00 .00
002375 LORENZ BUS SERVICE, INC. 1 1,007.00 1,007.00 .00 .00
002550 MENARDS, INC. 1 85.18 85.18 .00 .00
002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 73,281.00 73,281.00 .00 .00
002666 RICHARDS, BRIAN 1 275.00 275.00 .00 .00
002694 SBC, INC. 1 27.54 27.54 .00 .00
002700 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO, INC. 1 769.90 769.90 .00 .00
002760 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 4,676.00 4,676.00 .00 .00
002836 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 1 8,872.47 8,872.47 .00 .00
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:13:03 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
a�
Name
Operator: JAL Page: 4
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
003050 MRPA 1 1,040.00 1,040.00 .00 .00
003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 1 319.17 319.17 .00 .00
003162 SPIRIT HILLS, INC. 1 11,438.80 11,438.80 .00 .00
003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 4,963.00 4,963.00 .00 .00
003446 C & L EXCAVATING, INC. 1 26,875.58 26,875.58 .00 .00
003491 PETTY CASH 1 78.85 78.85 .00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 2 152.95 152.95 .00 .00
003641 QQEST SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC. 1 480.00 480.00 .00 .00
003880 SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 3 13,439.41 13,439.41 .00 .00
003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00
003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 264.05 264.05 .00 .00
003990 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF 1 10,117.41 10,117.41 .00 .00
004040 SMITH, PEG 1 149.25 149.25 .00 .00
004110 CARL BOLANDER & SONS COMPANY 1 7,365.74 7,365.74 .00 .00
004125 ST. PAUL CITY OF 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
STATE OF MINNESOTA
STREICHER'S 1 390.00 390.00 .00 .00
00 40
INC 1 12.57 12.57 .00 .00
004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 3,038.20 3,038.20 .00 .00
004350 T.K.D.A. 27 217,488.57 217,488.57 .00 .00
004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 14.12 14.12 .00 .00
004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 4 1,453.70 1,453.70 .00 .00
004470 COMO LUKE & SUPPLIES, INC. 1 250.15 250.15 .00 .00
004560 U S BANK 1 4,777.55 4,777.55 .00 .00
004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 1 1,453.73 1,453.73 .00 .00
004671 VERIZON WIRELES, BELLEVUE 1 113.65 113.65 .00 .00
004720 VIGER, JEAN 1 19.96 19.96 .00 .00
004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 41.34 41.34 .00 .00
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:13:04 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 5
Discount
VI/1# Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
900217 ARNT CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 322,944.58 322,944.58 .00 .00
900556 MINNESOTA SPORTS TURF MANAGERS ASSO 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00
900569 COTTAGE HOMESTEADS 1 26,940.00 26,940.00 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 150 990,514.97 990,514.97 .00 .00*
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:17:18 Operator: JAL
•
Ranges:
Options:
Page: 1
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Fund: (A)
Dept Id: (A)
Program: (A)
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Schedule Journal #: (R) 4064 - 4064
Bank #: (A)
Cash #: (A)
Payroll Check Dates: (A)
Print: D Sort: D
Report Format: 1 Print Ranges /Options: Y
# of copies: 1 Process Payroll: N
Total By Account: Y Page on Sort: N
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
0 ALEXANDER, MARY REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
0 BACCHUS HOMES, INC. REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6417 C * * * * * * **
0 BACHMAN, WARREN & SHEL REIMS BLDG ESCROW /1465 A * * * * * * **
O BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, GRILL RENTAL * * * * * * **
O BLAINE, CITY OF TESTING FEE * * * * * * **
0 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. TOW CHEV TAHOE /FORD CROW * * * * * * **
0 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE T MAPLIGHT * * * * * * **
0 GERRY, SONDRA REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
0 NOBLE, CHRISTOPHER REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
0 KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. CLAMP /HOSE * * * * * * **
O KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN LEGAL SERVICES * * * * * * **
0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT JUNE SAC /JULY SEWER * * * * * * **
O MILLER, ROSE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
S0 MINNESOTA STATE TREASU JULY SURCHARGE * * * * * * **
0 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH STATE WATER FEE
0 NELSON, CAROL REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
0 RAUSCH, RONALD REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
O SEMPLE EXCAVATING & TR HODGSON /BIRCH CLEANUP * * * * * * **
0 •SHOREVIEW, CITY OF UTILITY BILLING * * * * * * **
0 SPIRIT HILLS, INC. CLOSE ESCROW BALANCE * * * * * * **
0 T.K.D.A. EAGLEBROOK CHURCH /MAY * * * * * * **
0 U S BANK BOOKS /COMPUTER /SOFTWARE/ * * * * * * **
O ZYLSTRA HARLEY - DAVIDSO SUPPLIES * * * * * * **
Total for Dept **
•
52.00
1,500.00
3,000.00
47.07
145.88
203.42
99.73
57.00
57.00
52.61
922.25
32,076.00
34.00
8,872.47
4,676.00
33.00
8.00
3,688.44
10.40
11,438.80
96,512.69
3,499.86
798.07
167,784.69*
LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PROGRAM 158.00
Total for Dept 200 158.00*
CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE PROGRAM REC ADULT IN 440.00
Total for Dept 201 440.00*
MRPA SOFTBALL BERTHS ADULT SP 1,040.00
Total for Dept 202 1,040.00*
0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. T- SHIRTS SPECIAL 148.50
O PETTY CASH PETTY CASH SPECIAL 8.28
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:17:18 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 2
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept
Amount
0 RICHARDS, BRIAN
0 SAM'S CLUB, INC.
0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC.
0 CHOMINOX GOLF COURSE
0 PETTY CASH
o SAM'S CLUB, INC.
0 TARGET
0 U S BANK
0 SAM'S CLUB, INC.
PERFORMANCE
SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 205
SPECIAL
SPECIAL
T- SHIRTS YOUTH IN
PROGRAM REC YOUTH IN
PETTY CASH YOUTH IN
SUPPLIES YOUTH IN
SUPPLIES YOUTH IN
BOOKS /COMPUTER /SOFTWARE/ YOUTH IN
Total for Dept 207
SUPPLIES
Total for Dept 208
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JUNE 28
0 VIGER, JEAN SUPPLIES
Total for
0 ACCLAIM BENEFITS
0 CHOICEPOINT SERVICES,
0 CULLIGAN, BOTTLED WATE
71471 M EXCELSIOR, CITY OF
0 ONVOY, INC.
0 U S BANK
• 0
Dept 401
FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI
DRUG TESTING
MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE
MCFOA MEETING /JEAN & ANN
WEB HOSTING
BOOKS /COMPUTER /SOFTWARE/
Total for Dept 402
SMITH, PEG MILEAGE /JAN -JUNE
Total for Dept 406
YOUTH SP
MAYOR /CO
MAYOR /CO
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
SENIORS
0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FINANCE
Total for Dept 407
0 E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. FIELD UTILITIES
0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK GIS SERVICES
Total for Dept 415
0 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, L DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING
0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK GIS SERVICES
Total for Dept 416
T.K.D.A. P & Z
Total for Dept 417
0 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI LICENSE RENEWAL
0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK GIS SERVICES
Total for Dept 418
ECONOMIC
ECONOMIC
PLANNING
PLANNING
PLANNING
275.00
133.26
565.04*
450.00
440.00
40.67
106.93
117.83
449.61
1,605.04*
9.20
9.20*
1,019.70
19.96
1,039.66*
144.20
104.00
74.62
54.00
47.50
100.00
524.32*
149.25
149.25*
3,476.00
3,476.00*
394.37
2,470.00
2,864.37*
505.75
19.95
506.00
1,031.70*
ENGINEER 11,012.56
11,012.56*
Communit
Communit
266.25
39.50
305.75*
0 C. P.. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 79.61
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:17:18 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 3
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Description
Dept
Amount
CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE T
FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
JOHNSON, KEVIN
LORENZ BUS SERVICE, IN
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
SHRED -IT, INC.
ST. PAUL CITY OF
STATE OF MINNESOTA
STREICHER'S, INC.
CAR WASHES
LENS
PARTS /SUPPLIES
GAS /LODGING
TRANSPORTATION
MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE
DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT
RADIO SERVICE /MAINTENANC
CONNECT CHARGES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
VERIZON WIRELES, BELLE MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE
Total for Dept 420
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI 3RD QUARTERLY PAYMENT FIRE
Total for Dept 421
U S BANK BOOKS /COMPUTER /SOFTWARE/ BUILDING
Total for Dept 422
0 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, SOD
0 ALLIED BLACKTOP, INC.. CONTRACTOR /2004 SEALCOAT
0 HALVORSON CONCRETE, IN CURB /GUTTER
0 JOHNSON, RICK DEER REMOVAL
0 SBC, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE
0 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS ASPHALT
O T.K.D.A. 2004 SEALCOAT /MAY
Total for Dept 430
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
O BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SER INSTALL EXHAUST /MUFFLER/ FLEET
O COMO LURE & SUPPLIES, OIL FLEET
O DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DIESEL FUEL FLEET
0 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE T STROBE TUBE FLEET
0 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. PARTS 'FLEET
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES FLEET
O GRAINGER, INC. FAN FLEET
O LEEF BROTHER, INC. SHOP TOWELS FLEET
0 MENARDS, INC. SAW FLEET
0 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. SUPPLIES FLEET
O NEW HOLLAND PLAN PARTS /SUPPLIES FLEET
0 QQEST SOFTWARE SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FLEET
0 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH BULB FLEET
O TOLL GAS & WELDING SUP CYLINDER RENTAL FLEET
O W E LAHR COMPANY PARTS /SUPPLIES FLEET
Total for Dept 431
0 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC.
0 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR
0 BROCK WHITE, INC.
0 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
0 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO
WASTE REMOVAL
MAT RENTAL
SEALER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
63.90
468.15
2.76
173.97
1,007.00
837.39
54.95
57.00
390.00
12.57
113.65
3,260.95*
109,755.75
109,755.75*
353.54
353.54*
17.04
58,717.41
1,104.00
90.00
13.77
3,038.20
175.60
63,156.02*
150.00
250.15
7,295.65
73.27
72.17
23.38
101.27
18.26
85.18
291.22
169.11
480.00
14.12
5.40
793.13
9,822.31*
340.04
86.87
283.29
101.70
200.11
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:17:18 Operator: JAL
Page: 4
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
0 CENTRAL MINNESOTA GARA TRANSMITTER GOVERNME 29.75
O COORDINATED BUSINESS S MAINTENANCE CONTRACT GOVERNME 493.65
0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES GOVERNME 21.59
0 U S BANK BOOKS /COMPUTER /SOFTWARE/ GOVERNME 133.54
0 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. VALVES GOVERNME 41.34
O WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. SUPPLIES GOVERNME 308.87
0 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE GOVERNME 4,725.50
Total for Dept 432 6,766.25*
0 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. WASTE REMOVAL PARKS 111.15
0 BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, EQUIPMENT RENTAL PARKS 211.37
0 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE PARKS 56.65
0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES PARKS 31.60
0 GAMETIME RIVET /PAINT PARKS 433.43
0 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA LINE PARKS 80:26
O KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET SUPPLIES PARKS 53.51
0 LANGER'S TREE SERVICE TREE SERVICES PARKS 1,592.18
0 MINNESOTA SPORTS TURF REGISTRATION /MIKE H PARKS 35.00
O MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. SUPPLIES PARKS 27.95
O PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PARKS 29.90
0 SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES PARKS 5.29
Total for Dept 450 2,668.29*
0 SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES RECREATI 9.37
O U S BANK BOOKS /COMPUTER /SOFTWARE/ RECREATI 241.00
Total for Dept 451 250.37*
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC MAR 31,MAR 31,MAR 22 PARK BOA 190.00
Total for Dept 452 190.00*
O BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, L ECOLOGICAL PLANNING ENVIRONM 390.13
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC MAR 31,MAR 31,MAR 22 ENVIRONM 244.00
Total for Dept 461 634.13*
HAYNES, TRICIA PERFORMANCE /4 -12 -04 SOLID WA 325.00
Total for Dept 462 325.00*
0 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, IN MARKING PAINT FORESTRY 92.07
Total for Dept 463 92.07*
0 CENTERPOINT / MINNEGASCO MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE WATER 513.14
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES WATER 63.78
0 HALVORSON CONCRETE, IN CURB /GUTTER WATER 2,373.00
0 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN CHEMICALS WATER 5,899.91
0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING WATER 47.45
O INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, WATER SAMPLES WATER 85.00
0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WATER 790.00
0 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I METER INSTALLATION WATER 1,453.73
•0 SBC, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE WATER 9.18
0 SHOREVIEW, .CITY OF UTILITY BILLING WATER 8,746.74
Date: 07/16/2004 Time: 14:17:18 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 5
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
Total for Dept 494 19,981.93*
0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES SEWER 4.42
0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEWER 790.00
O MCTREE FARM 4.SPRUCE TREES SEWER 179.99
0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT JUNE SAC /JULY SEWER SEWER 41,205.00
0 SBC, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE SEWER 4.59
0 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF UTILITY BILLING SEWER 1,360.27
0 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE SEWER 237.50
Total for Dept 495 43,781.77*
0 ARNT CONSTRUCTION, INC CONTRACTOR /62 STREET OTHER 322,944.58
0 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, L GREENWAYS /TRIAL SYSTEM OTHER 2,835.30
O C & L EXCAVATING, INC. CONTRACTOR /TWILIGHT WATE OTHER 26,875.58
0 CARL BOLANDER & SONS C CONTRACTOR /CENTURY TRAIL OTHER 7,365.74
0 COTTAGE HOMESTEADS TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO /1ST HA OTHER 26,940.00
0 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT PARTS /SUPPLIES OTHER 601.73
0 EMILY, MARVIN A. & DON PERMANENT EASEMENT OTHER 17,750.00
O GISKE CONSULTING GROUP SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS OTHER 1,612.50
O HALVORSON CONCRETE, IN CURB /GUTTER OTHER 2,162.00
0 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES JET /VAC PIPE OTHER 647.50
0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER .2,686.00
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING OTHER 133.00
0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK I -35W INTERCHANGE OTHER 10,423.9.1
O T.K.D.A. 2004 WEAR COURSE /MAY OTHER 109,787.72
0 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SER ACQUISITION /RELOCATION S OTHER 1,315.45
Total for Dept 499 534,081.01*
•
CONTRACT HARDWARE TIF PAY -AS- YOU -GO /1ST HA CONTRACT
Total for Dept 514
3,390.00
3,390.00*
Grand Total 990,514.97*
-15-
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
7/19/2004
•
The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval:
DATE CHECK# NAME
7/16/2004 14363
7/16/2004 14364
7/16/2004 14365
7/16/2004 14366
7/16/2004 14367
7/16/2004 14368
7/16/2004 14369
7/16/2004 14370
7/16/2004 14371
7/16/2004 14372
7/16/2004 14373
7/16/2004 14374
7/16/2004 14375
•
•
Amoco Oil Company
Aspen Mills
Bill's Rental Center
City of Lino Lakes
Connexus Energy
Frattalone's Hardware
Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator
McLeod USA
Qwest
Ross Industries, Inc.
Viking Office Products
Xcel Energy
Ross Industries, Inc.
ACCOUNT
42100 - Fuel and Lube
42120 - Uniform Expense
42130 - Equipment Expense
41000 - Payroll Expense
42252 - Station 1 - Electric
42110 - Other Maintenance
42110 - Other Maintenance
42240 - Telephone Expense
42240 - Telephone Expense
42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies
42180 - Office Supplies Expense
42254 - Station 2 - Electric
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
AMOUNT
156.18
285.30
1.49
53,295.58
338.94
75.04
57.22
353.93
187.90
451.79
212.91
517.68
79.73
$56,013.69
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 26 July 2004
SUBJECT Severance Policy
VOTE REQUIRED 3/5
BACKGROUND
Over the past several years, the city and its unions have negotiated an upgrade to our
employee severance policy. The most recent group to receive the upgrade was our public works
employees in the 2004 -2005 contract. Our goal is have all of our benefits as equal as possible.
For that reason, it is our recommendation that the personnel policy (applies to non -union
employees) be brought into line with the rest of our work force.
The current schedule is as follows:
Years of Service Accrued Unused Sick Leave
After 10 years 25%
After 15 years 33.3%
After 20 years 50%
Proposed
Years of Service
After 10 years
Accrued Unused Sick Leave
50%
This past month, Mr. Barry Bernstein, Recreation Supervisor with the city for the past 13
years resigned his position to join the city of Hastings. Ban-y was a valued employee and should
not be penalized because policy has not been updated. Therefore it is staff's recommendation
that this policy update be retroactive to 1 July 2004.
OPTIONS
1. Update the severance provision of our personnel policy retroactive to 1 July 2004
2. No update the severance provision of our personnel policy.
RECOMMENDATION
Number 1.
OPTIONS
I I
I
(RECOMMENDATION
l I
•
AGENDA ITEM 3 -B
STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety
Director /Chief of Police
DATE June 26, 2004
TOPIC Consideration to hire two police
officers
VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority
I
BACKGROUND
The Lino Lakes Police Department is requesting approval to hire
two Police Officers.
• The Council previously approved to hire three officers utilizing
the Federal COPS grant.
We are requesting the approval to hire William Kubes, effective
August 23, 2004 and Wayne Wegener, Jr. effective September 13,
2004 upon their successful completion of the background
investigation, medical and psychological exams.
1. Approve request to hire two officers.
2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information.
Option No. 1
•
-17A-
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 4,A
STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety
Director /Chief of Police
DATE July 26, 2004
TOPIC
VOTES REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND
Annual renewal of Otter Lake Animal
Control Contract
3/5
We have had Otter Lake Animal Control Center as our contract
holder for the past 8 years. Our relationship during this
time with the business has been very professional and we
were able to meet the needs of the citizens, Otter Lake
Animal Control Center and the City by utilizing the
provisions of this contract. There are no changes from last
year's contract.
We request that the contract be renewed for calendar year
2004.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the request to enter into a renewal contract
with the Otter Lake Animal Control Center.
2. Return to staff for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
IITHIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 26th day of July 2004, by and between
the City of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014, hereinafter
referred to as the "Municipality ", and Otter Lake Animal Care Center, 6848 Otter Lake Road,
Hugo, Minnesota 55038, hereinafter referred to as "Otter Lake ", regarding the provision of
animal control services in the City of Lino Lakes.
The parties hereto agree as follows:
I. TERM
The term of this contract shall be from
through December 31, 2004
January 1, 2004
II. BASIC SERVICES
Otter Lake agrees to provide the following services:
1. Shelter for animals on a 24 hour basis.
2. Pick up and transport to the shelter building during normal business hours, seven days per
week upon the request of the appropriate Municipal official.
3. Animal examinations and veterinary care as required whenever staff is available.
4. Boarding for up to seven (7) days.
5. Euthanasia and disposal of animals if required.
6. Assist in handling animal abuse /neglect cases in cooperation with Municipal officials
when necessary.
7. Vaccinate all boarders with Bordatella upon arrival at $5.00 per cat or dog.
III. COMPENSATION
1. The Municipality shall pay Otter Lake the following fees:
A. IMPOUND FEE: An administration charge of $27.50 per animal for the first day of
impound.
B. BOARDING FEE: $12.00 per day, per animal, for each day after the first day of
impound.
C. QUARANTINE FEE: In addition to the regular boarding fee, $4.00 per day, per
animal, for all animals which must be quarantined, not to exceed ten (10) calendar
days.
D. TRANSPORTATION FEE: $27.50 per pick up.
• E. VETERINARY SERVICE: $40.00 per hour (maximum of $200.00 on any injury
charged to the city).
F. FLEA DIP: $15.00 per animal.
- 19 -
• G. EUTHANASIA AND DISPOSAL FEE 0 - 30 lbs. $11.00
31 - 60 lbs. $15.00
61 lbs. and over $19.00
•
•
H. VACCINATION FEE None (no vaccinations given).
2. The Municipality will not be charged those costs recovered from pet owners.
3. Charges for services, shall be paid monthly or within thirty (30) days after submission of
the monthly claims by Otter Lake to the Municipality. A copy of the impound sheet(s)
shall accompany the monthly claims.
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
In providing all services pursuant to this contract, Otter Lake Shall abide by all statutes,
ordinances rules and regulations pertaining to or regulating the provision of such services,
including those now in effect and hereinafter adopted. Otter Lake shall comply with
all requirements of Minn. Stat. 346.37 and shall indemnify and defendant the City
against any claimed violation of that statute, or any other statue, ordinance, rule or regulation
pertaining to the services provided by Otter Lake.
V. AUDIT DISCLOSURE AND RETENTION OF RECORDS
Otter Lake agrees to make available to duly authorized representative of the Municipality
and either the legislative auditor or the state auditor for the purpose to audit examination
pursuant to Minn. Stat. 16B.06, any books, documents, papers and records of Otter Lake
that are pertinent to Otter Lake's provision of services hereunder. Otter Lake further
agrees to maintain all such required records for three (3) years after receipt of final
payment and the closing of all other related matters.
VI. INSURANCE
Otter Lake shall purchase, maintain in full force and effect during the term of this
Contract the following insurance coverage:
1. WORKER'S COMPENSATION: Coverage at statutory limits as provided by the
State of Minnesota.
2. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY: Coverage shall have minimum
limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit for bodily injury
liability and property damage liability.
3. BUSINESS AUTO LIABILITY: Coverage shall have minimum limits of
$750,000 per occurrence, combined single limit of bodily injury liability and
property damage liability. This shall include owned vehicles hired and non -
owned vehicles and employee non - ownership.
illshall
•
•
Current valid insurance certificates meeting the requirements herein identified
be filed with the Municipality before signing of this Contract. All policies shall
provide, and the certificate issued shall evidence, that the Municipality shall be
notified in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation or modification of
coverage.
VII. EARLY TERMINATION
This Contract may be terminated by either party, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days
written notice, delivered by certified mail or in person, to the other party.
VIII. MODIFICATIONS
Any material alteration, modifications or variations of any terms of the Contract shall be
valid and enforceable only when they have been reduced to writing as an amendments and
signed by the parties. Municipality shall be named as an additional insured on all insurance
certificates.
IX. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
It is understood and agreed by the partied that the entire agreeement of the parties is
contained herein and that the Contract superseded all oral agreements and negotiations
between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements
presently in effect between Otter Lake and Municipality. The parties hereto revoke any prior
oral or written agreements between themselves and agree that this Contract is the only and
complete agreement regarding the subject hereof.
CITY OF LINO LAKES OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER
. BY: BY:
TITLE: TITLE:
BY:
TITLE:
DATE:
•
BY:
•
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Easement Vacation
FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 03 - 04, Vacating Drainage and Utility
Easements and Accepting New Easements, Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Brook
Peninsula
VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 VOTE REQUIRED
BACKGROUND:
City Staff is currently working with the applicant and the adjacent property owners of
Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Brook Peninsula regarding the vacation and acceptance of
drainage and utility easements. Meetings between City Staff and the property
owners continue to take place.
We are working with the Rice Creek Watershed District following the receipt of their
review on July 15, 2004. We are requesting that the Public Hearing be continued to
the August 9, 2004 City Council meeting.
OPTIONS:
1. Continue the Public Hearing to the August 9, 2004 City Council.
2. Return to staff for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Option 1.
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 7/26/04
TOPIC: Second Reading: Ordinance No. 20 -04 offering the sale of
property to Legacy Holdings Lino Lakes, LLC
Vote Required: Simple majority
BACKGROUND:
The City of Lino Lakes owns 11.69 acres of property for sale on the southeast
quadrant of 35W /Lake Drive. This land makes up a portion of the proposed
Legacy at Woods Edge mixed use downtown development.
Hartford Group, Inc. has proposed a project that meets criteria established in the
Comprehensive Plan for this site.
According to the City Charter, the sale of real property shall be disposed of by
ordinance. The proceeds of the sale shall be used to retire outstanding debt
incurred by the city in the purchase of the property. In this case, it will be used to
offset the costs incurred in purchasing the property and putting in public
improvements. Once outstanding debt is paid, the city council may designate
some other public use for the proceeds.
The year end financial statements for 2003 show the Town Center Project Fund
had a deficit of $1,081,320. This balance is the same as it was at the end of
2002, and no additional costs have been charged to this fund since the
beginning of the year. The break -even analysis for the fund contained in the
2002 audit management letter to the City Council by Darwin Viker of LAWCO
states a per square foot cost of the property at $4.38. The sale price of $4.50
per foot agreed to by Hartford Development will result in a net gain on the sale of
the property and will eliminate the deficit in the Town Center project fund.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 20 -04 offering the sale of
property to Legacy Holdings Lino Lakes, LLC
• 2. Do not approve the sale.
3. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
ORDINANCE NO. 20-04
AN ORDINANCE OFFERING THE SALE OF A PARCEL OF LAND
BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES
The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
I.
The real property described as: That part of Outlot A, THE VILLAGE NO. 1, and that
part of Government Lot 2, Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, all in Anoka County, Minnesota,
described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of the South 280.00 feet of said Government Lot 2;
thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 19 seconds West (assumed bearing) along the east line
of said Government Lot 2 a distance of 593.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 43
seconds West 223.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 19 seconds West 93.34 feet;
thence North 36 degrees 41 minutes 17 seconds West 89.48 feet; thence North 76 degrees 28
minutes 17 seconds West 90.74 feet; thence South 87 degrees 49 minutes 43 seconds West
152.81 feet; thence South 79 degrees 33 minutes 43 seconds West 132.97 feet; thence South
58 degrees 50 minutes 43 seconds West 83.64 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point
A "; thence continuing South 58 degrees 50 minutes 43 seconds West along a line hereinafter
referred to as "Line A" 44.84 feet; thence South 32 degrees 25 minutes 43 seconds West
59.62 feet; thence North 67 degrees 10 minutes 03 seconds West 72.15 feet; thence
southerly 69.30 feet along a non - tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of
260.00 feet, a central angle of 15 degrees 16 minutes 16 seconds, and having a chord bearing
of South 23 degrees 38 minutes 24 seconds West; thence North 74 degrees 52 minutes 25
seconds West, not tangent to said curve, 28.71 feet; thence North 65 degrees 39 minutes 49
seconds West 60.00 feet; thence southwesterly 152.11 feet along a non - tangential curve
concave to the northwest having a radius of 133.00 feet, a central angle of 65 degrees 31
minutes 36 seconds, and a chord bearing of South 57 degrees 05 minutes 59 seconds West;
thence South 89 degrees 51 minutes 47 seconds West, tangent to said curve, 436.60 feet to
the northerly right -of -way line of Town Center Parkway as platted in said THE VILLAGE
NO. 1 and said "Line A" there terminating, said point also being the point of beginning of
the property to be described; thence easterly, northeasterly, southeasterly, northeasterly,
easterly, and northeasterly along said "Line A" to said "Point A "; thence North 16 degrees 01
minute 01 second East 439.54 feet; thence South 73 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds East
183.67 feet; thence North 00 degrees 35 minutes 54 seconds East 145.14 feet to the north
line of said Outlot A; thence North 89 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds West along said north
line 843.86 feet to the easterly right -of -way line of Village Drive as platted in said THE
•
•
•
VILLAGE NO. 1; thence South 25 degrees 06 minutes 50 seconds West along said easterly
right -of -way line 725.18 feet to the northerly right -of -way line of said Town Center
Parkway; thence South 64 degrees 53 minutes 10 seconds East along said right -of -way line
52.94 feet to the point of beginning.
This real property (the "Property ") contains 11.69 acres and is owned by the City of Lino
Lakes (the "City "). The city council of the City has determined that the Property is no longer
needed by the City for any public purpose.
II.
The city council of the City authorizes sale of the property to Legacy Holdings Lino
Lakes, LLC. The mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute a
purchase agreement and other documents as may be necessary in order to sell the
Property. Proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used in accordance with the
requirements of the city charter.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its
passage and publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the city charter.
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John Bergeson, Mayor
•
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson
MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: Anoka County Agreement For Residential Recycling Program /2004
BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes receives SCORE funds each year
from Anoka County. The SCORE funds are used to fund solid waste recycling
programs. Cities using SCORE funds allocated by Anoka County are required to
enter into a cooperative agreement with the County.
Please find attached copies of the original agreement for your consideration.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Anoka County Contract #2003 -0246, Agreement For Residential
Recycling Program.
2. Refer back to staff for further review.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1.
• Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -111
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes has entered into an agreement with Anoka County
over the years to cooperatively work on Solid Waste abatement and Recycling
AND WHEREAS, Anoka County receives funding from the Solid Waste
Management Coordinating Board and the State of Minnesota in the form of "SCORE"
funds,
AND WHEREAS, The County wishes to assist Municipalities in meeting recycling
goals established by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners by providing SCORE
funds to cities in the County for solid waste recycling programs,
AND WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes is elligible to receive $42,189.94 for fiscal
year 2004 in Score funds,
AND WHEREAS, Anoka County Agreement No. 2003 -0246 provides for the
cooperative effort between Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. Adopt Resolution and Sign Anoka County Agreement No. 2003 -0246,
Agreement For Residential Recycling Program
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of July, 2004
Ann Blair, Clerk- Treasurer
John Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed,
adopted and approved by the City Council on date.
Ann Blair, Clerk- Treasurer
•
Anoka County Contract # 2003 -0246
AGREEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
-THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on 16th day of December, 2003,
notwithstanding the date of the signatures of the parties, between the COUNTY OF ANOKA,
State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY ", and the CITY OF LINO LAKES,
hereinafter referred to as the "MUNICIPALITY ".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Anoka County has received $708,603 in funding from the Solid Waste
Management Coordinating Board and the State of Minnesota pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115A.557
(hereinafter "SCORE funds "); and
WHEREAS, the County wishes to assist the Municipality in meeting recycling goals
established by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners by providing said SCORE funds to
cities and townships in the County for solid waste recycling programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained
in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions:
1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for cooperation between the
County and the Municipality to implement solid waste recycling programs in the
Municipality.
2. TERM. The term of this Agreement is from January 1, 2004 through December 31,
2004, unless earlier terminated as provided herein.
DEFINITIONS.
a. "Problem material" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115A.03,
subdivision 24a.
b. "Multi -unit households" means households within apartment complexes,
condominiums, townhomes, mobile homes and senior housing complexes.
c. "Opportunity to recycle" means providing recycling and curbside pickup or
collection centers for recyclable materials as required by Minn. Stat. § 115A.552.
d. "Recycling" means the process of collecting and preparing recyclable materials
and reusing the materials in their original form or using them in manufacturing
processes that do not cause the destruction of recyclable materials in a manner
that precludes further use. -
e. "Recyclable materials" means materials that are separated from mixed municipal
solid waste for the purpose of recycling, including paper, glass, plastics, metals,
fluorescent lamps, major appliances and vehicle batteries.
f Refuse derived fuel or other material that is destroyed by incineration is not a
recyclable material.
g.
"Yard waste" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115A.03,
subdivision 38.
4. PROGRAM. The Municipality shall develop and implement a residential solid waste
recycling program adequate to meet the Municipality's annual recycling goal of 1570 tons
of recyclable materials as established by the County. The Municipality shall ensure that
the recyclable materials collected are delivered to processors or end markets for
recycling.
a. The Municipal recycling program shall include the following components: .
i. Each household (including multi -unit households) in the Municipality
shall have the opportunity to recycle at least four broad types of materials,
such as paper, glass, plastic, metal and textiles.
ii. The recycling program shall be operated in compliance with all applicable
federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations.
iii. The Municipality shall implement a public information program that
contains at least the following components:
(1) One promotion is to be mailed to each household focused
exclusively on the Municipality's recycling program;
(2) One promotion advertising recycling opportunities available for
residents is to be included in the Municipality's newsletter or local
newspaper; and
(3) Two community presentations are to be given on recycling.
The public information components listed above must promote the
focused recyclable material of the year as specified by the County. The
County will provide the Municipality with background material on the
focused recyclable material of the year.
iv. The Municipality, on an ongoing basis, shall identify new residents and
provide detailed information on the recycling opportunities available to
these new residents.
b If the Municipality's recycling program did not achieve the Municipality's
recycling goals as established by the County for the prior calendar year, the
Municipality shall prepare and submit to the County by March 31, 2003, a plan
acceptable to County that is designed to achieve the recycling goals set forth in
this Agreement.
5. REPORTING. The Municipality shall submit the following reports semiannually to the
County no later than July 20, 2004 and January 20, 2005:
An accounting of the amount of waste which has been recycled as a result of the
Municipality's activities and the efforts of other community programs, redemption
centers and drop -off centers. For recycling programs, the Municipality shall
certify the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been collected
and the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been marketed. For
recycling programs run by other persons or entities, the Municipality shall also
provide documentation on forms provided by the County showing the tons of
materials that were recycled by the Municipality's residents through these other
- 33 -
2,
•
•
programs. The Municipality shall keep detailed records documenting the
disposition of all recyclable materials collected pursuant to this agreement. The
Municipality shall also report the number of cubic yards or tons of yard waste
collected for composting or landspreading, together with a description of the
methodology used for calculations. Any other material removed from the waste
stream by the Municipality, i.e. tires and used oil, shall also be reported
separately.
b. Information regarding any revenue received from sources other than the County
for the Municipality's recycling programs.
c. Copies of all promotional materials that have been prepared by the Municipality
during the term of this Agreement to promote its recycling programs.
The Municipality agrees to furnish the County with additional reports in form and at
frequencies requested by the County for financial evaluation, program management
purposes, and reporting to the State of Minnesota.
BILLING AND PAYMENT PROCEDURE. The Municipality shall submit itemized
invoices semiannually to the County for abatement activities no later than July 20, 2004
and January 20, 2005. Costs not billed by January 20, 2005 will not be eligible for
funding. The invoices shall be paid in accordance with standard County procedures,
subject to the approval of the Anoka County Board of Commissioners.
7. ELIGIBILITY FOR FUNDS. The Municipality is entitled to receive reimbursement
for eligible expenses, less revenues or other reimbursement received, for eligible
activities up to the project maximum as computed below, which shall not exceed
$42,189.94. The project maximum for eligible expenses shall be computed as follows:
a. A base amount of $10,000.00 for recycling activities only;
b. $4.51 per household for recycling activities only; and
c. unexpended funds carried over from the Municipality's 2003 allocation.
8. RECORDS. The Municipality shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in
accordance with requirements of the County and the State of Minnesota. The
Municipality shall maintain strict accountability of all funds and maintain records of all
receipts and disbursements. Such records and accounts shall be maintained in a form
which will permit the tracing of funds and program income to final expenditure. The
Municipality shall maintain records sufficient to reflect that all funds received under this
Agreement were expended in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 115A.557, subd. 2, for
residential solid waste recycling purposes. The Municipality shall also maintain records
of the quantities of materials recycled. All records and accounts shall be retained as
provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than five years from the last receipt
of payment from the County pursuant to this Agreement.
•
9. AUDIT. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, the Municipality shall allow the County or
other persons or agencies authorized by the County, and the State of Minnesota,
including the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor, access to the records of the
Municipality at reasonable hours, including all books, records, documents, and
accounting procedures and practices of the Municipality relevant to the subject matter of
the Agreement, for purposes of audit. In addition, the County shall have access to the
project site(s), if any, at reasonable hours.
10. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. In performing the provisions of this Agreement, both parties agree to comply with
all applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or
standards established by any agency or special governmental unit which are now
or hereafter promulgated insofar as they relate to performance of the provisions of
this Agreement. In addition, the Municipality shall comply with all applicable
requirements of the State of Minnesota for the use of SCORE funds provided to
the Municipality by the County under this Agreement.
b. No person shall illegally, on the grounds of race, creed, color, religion, sex,
marital status, public assistance status, sexual preference, handicap, age or
national origin, be excluded from full employment rights in, participation in, be
denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to unlawful discrimination under
any program, service or activity hereunder. The Municipality agrees to take
affirmative action so that applicants and employees are treated equally with
respect to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment,
layoff, termination, selection for training, rates of pay, and other forms of
compensation.
c. The Municipality shall be responsible for the performance of all subcontracts and
shall ensure that the subcontractors perform fully the terms of the subcontract.
The Agreement between the Municipality and a subcontractor shall obligate the
subcontractor to comply fully with the terms of this Agreement.
d. The Municipality agrees that the Municipality's employees and subcontractor's
employees who provide services under this agreement and who fall within any job
classification established and published by the Minnesota Department of Labor &
Industry shall be paid, at a minimum, the prevailing wages rates as certified by
said Department.
e. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement is contained herein and that
this Agreement supersedes all oral and written agreements and negotiations
between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.
Any amendments, alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of this
Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing, duly
signed by the parties.
-35
4
g.
Contracts let and purchases made under this Agreement shall be made by the
Municipality in conformance with all laws, rules, and regulations applicable to the
Municipality.
h. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section,
subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to
be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining portion of this
Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating the relationship of co-
partners, joint venturers, or an association between the County and Municipality,
nor shall the Municipality, its employees, agents or representatives be considered
employees, agents, or representatives of the County for any purpose.
11. PUBLICATION. The Municipality shall acknowledge the financial assistance of the
County on all promotional materials, reports and publications relating to the activities
funded under this Agreement, by including the following acknowledgement: "Funded by
the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and State SCORE funds (Select Committee
on Recycling and the Environment).
• 12. INDEMNIFICATION. The County agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the
Municipality harmless from all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or
character, including the cost of defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its
public officials, officers, agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities
performed by the County under this Agreement.
The Municipality agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from all
claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of
defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its public officials, officers,
agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities performed by the Municipality
under this Agreement.
The provisions of this subdivision shall survive the termination or expiration of the term
of this Agreement.
13. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual written agreement of
the parties or by either party, with or without cause, by giving not less than seven (7)
days written notice, delivered by mail or in person to the other party, specifying the date
of termination. If this Agreement is terminated, assets acquired in whole or in part with
funds provided under this Agreement shall be the property of the Municipality so long as
said assets are used by the Municipality for the purpose of a landfill abatement program
approved by the County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto set their hands as of the dates first
written above:
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
By: By:
Name:
Title: Date:
Date:
Dan Erhart, Chairman
Anoka County Board of Commissioners
By:
Municipality's Clerk
• Date:
Approved as to foiin and legality:
-37
0
ATTEST:
John "Jay" McLinden
County Administrator
Date:
Approved as to form and legality:
Assistant County Attorney
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6 E
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
C. C. MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -108
Final Plat: Elm Street Estates
(formerly Lakeview Estates)
Elm St. and Lakeview Drive
VOTE: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The City Council approved the preliminary plat for Lakeview Estates in October 2003
with Resolution 03 -184. Apparently, there already is a Lakeview Estates in Anoka
County, so the applicant changed the name to Elm Street Estates.
This project involves an existing residential lot with one existing house (7180 Lakeview
Drive) at the corner of Elm Street and Lakeview Drive. The owner split the property into
three lots, which creates two new house lots fronting on Elm St. The installation of city
water and sanitary sewer service in Elm St. made this subdivision possible.
The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. There is no development
agreement because there are no public improvements for the plat. The City Attorney's
review of the title commitment is underway and will be fully resolved prior to City
Council approval of the final plat. Conditions of approval will be met with building
permit review of the new houses.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -108, approving the final plat for Elm Street Estates.
2. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -108
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR ELM STREET ESTATES
(FORMERLY LAKEVIEW ESTATES)
WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a final plat, and
WHEREAS, review and approvals of plats are governed by state statutes and City
ordinances, and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Lakeview Estates on
October 27, 2003 with Resolution 03 -184; and
WHEREAS, the Lakeview Estates project has been renamed Elm Street Estates; and
WHEREAS, the final plat for Elm Street Estates is consistent with the Lakeview Estates
preliminary plat;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino
Lakes hereby approves the final plat for Elm Street Estates.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004.
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
W o
:p' H
IIca.
7
•
-I
J
CITY Cr Lim) LAKES
s
fr
:± tg
8
6
0
r
Ll3V. 3NV1 M. NO100.1
•1 10010 1 101 A 3N111513 -.,
3 "B6,L1.005
1L1,71
M
L
L
r
B
1
1
s
tl
L91BZl
M,11,00.00S
.1 0010 3 ±011140 311 M1 0SY3
S
3
d.
30 5
a2
C Ed�p�
t 8BY_+
25 HMV
1
c2.12
Os
t ilg
'
1 01p
i ° —101 —g3
g 0 _,_rJ e§
—1-1-1 1 _
1 1_i
csE
i
0•
1
1
yy
AGENDA ITEM 6 F
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
C. C. MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: i) First Reading, Ordinance 10 -04: Rezoning From R -1 to R -3
ii) Resolution 04 -57: Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit
Development and Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat
iii) Continued Public Hearing: Ordinance 08 -04, Vacating
, Drainage and Utility Easement
Highland Meadows East 2n Addition
VOTE:
i) Ord. 10 -04, rezoning 3/5
ii) Resol. 04 -57, CUP/PUD and plat 3/5
iii) Ord. 08 -04, vacating easement 4/5
BACKGROUND
TSM Development has requested approval to develop Outlot A of the Highland Meadows East
development, approved in 1999. The comprehensive plan guides the site for medium density
residential use. The applicant requests rezoning to R -3 Medium Density. The request also
includes a Planned Unit Development (PUD) in order to allow for a private road and other
departures from standard zoning requirements. A preliminary plat also is required with the PUD.
An existing drainage and utility easement must be vacated for the project. The project also
requires a site plan review for the townhomes. This typically is an administrative review.
However, it is an inherent part of the PUD, so it will be discussed here.
Therefore, to accommodate the proposal, the following approvals are necessary:
1. Rezoning from R -1 Single Family Residential to R -3 Medium Density Residential
2. Conditional Use Permit for a residential Planned Unit Development
3. Development stage plan/preliminary plat
4. Vacation of drainage and utility easement.
ANALYSIS
The following is a summary of the of the proposal:
Gross Site Area 3.47 acres
Upland Area 3.47 acres
Total Units 18
Gross Density 5.19 units /acre
Net Density 5.19 units /acre
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition
page 2
Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning
The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the
area.
Location
.Existing Land Use
Guided Land Use
Existing
Zoning
R -1
Site
vacant
Medium Density Residential
North
single family residential
Medium Density Residential
R -1
South
single family residential
& commerc. greenhouse
Medium Density Residential
R -1
East
vacant
Medium Density Residential
R -1 & R -2
West
residential, townhomes
Medium Density Residential
R -3 PDO
The site is guided for Medium Density Residential land use. This accommodates 3 -6 units per
acre.
• Growth Management:
MUSA Reserve: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy establish a
specific number of MUSA acres for residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The
site is within the current MUSA, so no reserve allocation is needed.
Growth Management. Units /Year: The comprehensive plan and the growth management
policy establish a specific number of dwelling units of residential growth for stage one (prior to
year 2010). The goal is 147 per year. The City Council has the flexibility to exceed the limit by
20% (29 units) in a year without amending the comprehensive plan.
The goal for 2004 has been exceeded and the additional 20% also has been used. This means
that new development cannot be final platted until 2005. This applies to this project, and is a
condition of approval. As seen in the table at the end of this report, year 2005 can accommodate
this project without exceeding the annual goal. Only 115 lots have been approved for 2005, so
there are lots available. Adding 18 units will bring the total to 133.
Planned Unit Development: Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat
Section 2, Subd. 10 of the zoning ordinance discusses the purpose of a planned unit development
(PUD). The application should be compared to these purposes in order to justify the flexibility
allowed by a PUD.
Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for the
grouping of Tots or buildings for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to
traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development. This section is
intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition
page 3
open space through clustering of Tots, buildings and activities, which promote the goals
outlined in the Comprehensive Plan or serve another public purpose. It is further intended
that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated
planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance of parking, open space
and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses.
A residential conditional use permit PUD may include a variety of residential units, including
single family and multifamily units as long as it complies with the density requirements. ...
The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to
setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a
mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage:
1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures
through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments.
3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing
vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion.
4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and
orderly transition of varying and uses in close proximity to each other.
5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby
lowering development costs and public investments.
6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the
strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations.
Lots: There are no minimum unit lot sizes for multifamily dwellings. The ordinance requires
that unit lots "shall be the minimum area necessary to include the living area, garages, decks,
patios, or porches of the individual dwelling units." The table below compares the application to
the minimum lot standards.
The 1999 report on the approval of the Highland Meadows East preliminary plat included the
following statement:
-43-
R -3 zone
PUD
proposed
unit lot width
24'
24'
46'
setbacks
from street
side yard
rear yard
30'
10'
30'
25'
same as zoning
same as zoning
22' from private drive
20'
20'
impervious surface
65% max
39%
building separation
10'
The 1999 report on the approval of the Highland Meadows East preliminary plat included the
following statement:
-43-
•
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition
page 4
For future consideration, there will be 108 +feet remaining between the rear lot line of
Lot 1 and the Outlot A boundary directly to the south. This does not allow for the
minimum lot widths or depths of the existing two- or multi family residential zoning
districts. How Outlot A will be developed in the future has yet to be seen, but approval of
the present plat application should not be considered implied approval of any future plan
in Outlot A.
The proposal includes a narrowed access road as well as reduced setbacks around the periphery
of the site. The 26' private drive is narrower than a public street, which would be a minimum
28' (measured back of curb to back of curb.). The setbacks from this private drive were
increased since an original submittal and now meet the normally required 25'.
The PUD requirements state that "front and side yard restrictions at the periphery of the Planned
Unit Development site at a minimum shall be the same as imposed in the respective base
districts. The PUD standards do not specify a rear setback minimum. Typically, a 30' rear
setback is required in an R -3 zone. The goal is to maintain adequate buffering around the site
while allowing flexibility inside the site.
After an original submittal, changes to the plan included the removal of two structures from the
north central area. This created extra space to move other units in order to keep a 30' setback
from the site boundary lines. Unit 2 is 21' from the south property line, but this is on the side of
the unit. There is ample space behind the unit to the east. The decks would be 20± feet from the
property lines, other than unit 2.
The City Engineer's previous review noted that a swale or storm sewer is needed along the south
property line, which has been added.
As required by the ordinance, the applicant submitted a "yield plan" to show what could be done
on the site by adhering to the standard zoning requirements. The yield plan is reasonable, and
shows 20 units. The current plan provides ample open area with 18 units.
Landscaping: Where a side or rear lot line in an R -3 District abuts an R, R-X, R-1, R-
1X, R -EC, or R -2 District, or public road right -of -way, a landscape buffer area not less than
twenty (20) feet in depth shall be provided along such side or rear lot line and shall contain
landscaping, planting, berming or other screening suitable to provide an effective visual screen.
Property on three sides of the site is zoned R -1. Though future zoning likely will change, the site
should include screening for the benefit of residents both around the site and within the site.
Landscaping has been added to an original landscaping plan. Screening has been added to the
plan on the north and south sides of the site. Existing trees provide additional screening on the
east and west sides. Because some existing trees will be lost due to the installation of the storm
sewer, additional spruce have been added in the extreme southwest corner, behind units 9, 10,
•
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition
page 5
and 11. The exact location of these must not interfere with the stormwater pipe that was added
to the plan.
The P & Z recommended two additional screening trees north of the central guest parking stalls.
There were four shown. Only one has been added. One more is needed. A storm sewer pipe
runs between them. Any more trees could interfere with the stormwater pipe.
The plan notes include requiring the City's seed mixture around the ponds.
Streets, Access, Parking: The proposal includes a private drive of 26'. A PUD allows
private streets with a minimum 26' width. The access drive will align with Nancy Drive on the
north side
of 79 th St. The reduced pavement width will reduce impervious surface. When
Highland Meadows East was platted, a 60' gap was created to allow for a public street right of
way. The additional width would become part of the landscaped open space.
There is no street light at this intersection. One should be added with this development, as is
typical with new developments. This is a condition of approval.
The plan provides for guest parking stalls. This is a good idea because there is so little curb
space that is not broken up by driveways. The minimum amount of offstreet parking is 21/4
spaces per unit. The garages and driveways provide this, but guest parking is a smart feature.
The private drive exceeds the normal 500' maximum for a cul de sac. A private drive is
allowable as part of a PUD, as is the additional length.
Parks: The subdivision ordinance includes park dedication requirements. Park
dedication is $1665 per residential unit, less any land dedication. There is no land dedication
needed, so the park dedication will be $1665 x the number of units for 18 units. This would total
$29,970.
Open Space: A PUD requires that a minimum of 50% of land subdivided for
development shall be reserved as common open space. We have been examining the PUD
requirements over the last year. Urban developments differ from rural developments in that
"open space" just isn't as "open" in an urban development, especially the smaller ones. We have
been using pervious surface for urban developments to calculate the "open space ". This
admittedly is imperfect, but provides a workable method for now as we gain experience with the
new ordinance provisions and learn what needs to be revised. The project provides the
following:
square feet
percentage
total Area of Site
151,150
total impervious
58,561
39%
total pervious
92,589
61%
•
•
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition
page 6
Utilities: Sanitary sewer and water service will connect to existing facilities in 79th St. and
follow the private drive into the site. Individual units must have individual connections. The
sanitary sewer and water utilities in the private drive should be City facilities, just as they would
if it were a public street right of way. This is a condition of approval. All of Lot 19 is to be
covered by a drainage and utility easement, which provides access to the utilities.
The normal drainage and utility easement around a property boundary is accommodated by an
easement covering all of Lot 1— except for a corner of Lot 2. An additional easement must be
delineated there.
Grading and Stormwater Management: Stormwater ponds will be created in the northern
portion of the site and in the southwest area. Drainage and utility easements will cover the ponds
and stormwater facilities. Easements also will be platted along all the external property lines.
We expect that the Rice Creek Watershed District will issue its preliminary approval of the
project on July 28.
The project also will require the vacation of an existing ponding easement. The original
Highland Meadows East plat included a drainage and utility easement in the northwest corner of
the site. The 2nd Addn. application includes a reconfiguration of the easement and pond. The
"pond" existed for several years as a borrow pit for fill for Highland Meadows West areas. The
development of the site will correct this. The easement vacation will be addressed with the
consideration of Ordinance 08 -04.
Site Plan, Townhomes
Buildings: New architectural drawings submitted June 30 include vinyl siding, vinyl shakes,
and a significant amount of facing brick on the front of the building. The City's building
material standards in the zoning ordinance state:
Exterior Building Finish: The exterior of townhome dwelling units shall include a variation in
building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated
into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In
addition, townhome dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements:
a) A minimum of twenty -five (25) percent of the combined area of all building facades of a
structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco and /or natural or artificial stone.
b) Except for brick, stucco, and /or natural or artificial stone, no single building facade shall
have more than seventy -five (75) percent of one type of exterior finish.
c) For the purpose of this section, the area of the building facade shall not include area
devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas.
The buildings meet the minimum brick requirement. The rear and side elevations look very
much like a typical single family home, though larger. Because of the size, it would be
appropriate to include vinyl shakes in the gable ends to break up the appearance of the large
building walls. It is difficult to tell if this is included in the black and white drawings submitted.
•
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition
page 7
The maximum allowable height in an R -3 zone is 36'. The proposed structure heights are 22'
The minimum floor area is 920 sf for a two- bedroom unit. The proposed units have two floors.
The upper level is approximately 1100 to 1200 sf. The lower level is approximately 500 sf. The
proposed units meet the height and floor area requirements. The units have three -car garages
except for the center units in the three -unit buildings. The garage sizes compare to other recent
townhome projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
The Environmental Board reviewed this application on February 25`h. Recommendations are
attached.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
The P & Z voted to approve the project, with conditions, at its April 14 meeting. The applicant
has been working since then on plan revisions and additional information to address issues raised
by the staff review and discussed by the P & Z. Remaining conditions of approval are listed in
Resolution 04 -57.
OPTIONS.
1. Approve the project, including the three elements:
2.
i) Ordinance 10 -0, first reading, rezoning the site from R -1 to R -3
ii) Resolution 04 -57, conditional use permit for planned unit development and
development stage plan/preliminary plat, with the conditions listed in the resolution
iii) Ordinance 08 -04, first reading, vacating the drainage and utility easement
3. Deny the application with separate votes.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition
page 8
This review is based on the following:
Existing Conditions Plan, received June 30, 2004
Preliminary Plat, received June 30, 2004
Preliminary Grading & Erosion Control Plan, received June 30, 2004
Preliminary Utility Plan, received June 30, 2004
Tree Preservation Plan, received June 30, 2004
Landscape Plan, received June 30, 2004
Building Elevations, received June 30, 2004
•
Ct) Ti C)
O ,. N
O E O
C
O
N
0
N
L)
C)
Ct
N
r
r
0
LC)
0
r
Cr)
N
LC)
r
N
r
r
r
d-
N
O
r
N
0
CO
r
CO
r
231
56
6531
'Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted)
O
12008
0
CO
CO
CO
CO
CD
O
O
N
CO
M
L()
O
N
T
O LC)
O
N
CN
C n r
101
N
CO
CO
r
Cr)
N
r
r
CO
h
r'
vr
O
O
N
CO
r
`O
0
471
T-
cf
N
n
T
(,.)
O
O
N
N
LC)
561,
r
0
10
C O
N
N
N
r
r
148
year end
2002
O
Lo
r
=
L
11
co
O
N
r
O
CCn0
0
Cr)
O
N
T
r
N
O
N
CO
CO
r
CO
N
CO
Ll)
Development Name
approved prelim. plats
brook
Addn
Century Farms North
Keefe: prel plat, not final plat
Morton (minor subdiv)
Ravens Hollow
Haley Manor (10 new lots)
Crystal Cove
Millers Crossroads
Lakeview Estates (2 new)
'Snell (minor subdivision)
Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th
Justin's Preserve
IMarshan Estates
Rice Creek Church duplex
Rice Church: Oakwood View
nes Addn
1proposed
'land Meadows East 2nd
heasant Hills 12th island
West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add
Marshan Townhomes 2nd
Fox Den Acres (resubmittal)
total
- 4 9 -
ti
ti
Ct
r
ti
N
O)
N
N
ti
CA
r
7
a
.0
ti
[t
O
ca
(n
0
a)
x0a)
X
a)
w
L
Q
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 10 -04
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -1 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL TO
R -3 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE
HIGHLAND MEADOWS EAST 2ND ADDITION DEVELOPMENT
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1: Findings
The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the
property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd.lE of the Lino Lakes
zoning ordinance:
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of
and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The project
complies with the land use in the comprehensive plan: the site is guided for Medium Density
Residential use and the proposed R -3 zoning is intended for that category. The site is within
the existing Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Final platting will not occur until
2005 due to the growth management policy restriction on the number of units to be platted
per year. The project will be consistent with both the MUSA and units /per year limitations
of the growth management policy.
2. The proposed use is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site is
guided for medium density residential uses, as is land to the west, south, and east. Existing
and anticipated future land uses in the area are considered compatible with the proposed uses.
3. Upon compliance with the conditions of approval set forth in Resolution 04 -57, the proposed
use will conforms with all performance standards contained in the zoning ordinance and
other requirements.
4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the City's service capacity. Water and sanitary sewer service is available via 79th
St. on the north side of the site.
5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property.
The addition of 18 dwelling units will not overburden the street capacity in the area.
•
•
Section 2
The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City
Council on March 10, 2003 is hereby amended by rezoning from R -1 Single Family Residential,
to R -3 Medium Density Residential, pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate:
Outlot A, Highland Meadows East, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Anoka County, Minnesota
Section 3
As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously
amended.
Section 4
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according
to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004.
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 51- Ordinance 10 -04, page 2
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04-57
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT
AND A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR THE PROPOSED HIGHLAND MEADOWS EAST 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings:
Findings
1. TSM Development has requested approval of a conditional use permit for a residential
planned unit development (PUD) and a development stage plan/preliminary plat for the PUD.
2. The comprehensive plan guides the site for land use category Medium Density Residential:
3 -6 units per acre.
3. The maximum allowable density within an urban residential PUD shall be consistent with the
density directives of the Comprehensive Plan, as stated in the zoning ordinance, Section 2,
Subd. 10.D.3., Urban Residential Planned Unit Development Requirements.
4. The site, currently described as Outlot A, Highland Meadows East, includes 3.47 acres south
of 79th St. The application includes 23 dwelling units, for a net density of 5.19 units per acre.
The site is to be rezoned to R -3, Medium Density Residential, as approved by Ordinance 10-
04.
6. The Lino Lakes Growth Management Ordinance, Ordinance No. 01 -03 establishes a goal to
limit new growth in the city to an average of 147 new housing units per year, with discretion
to exceed this target by 20 %. The project falls within the 147 goal for year 2005. This
project shall not be final platted until 2005.
7. The Planning & Zoning Board opened a public hearing on the application on March 10, 2004
and closed it on April 14, 2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the
application for a conditional use permit /planned unit development and development stage plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following conditions of approval apply:
•
1. The project shall not be final platted until 2005, as dictated by the growth management
policy.
2. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review of July 13, 2004 must be addressed to his
satisfaction.
3. Drainage and utility easements shall cover the ponds and stormwater facilities.
4. The normal drainage and utility easement around a property boundary is accommodated by
an easement covering all of Lot 1— except for the southeast corner of Lot 2. An additional
10' easement there must be dedicated to the City.
5. Sanitary sewer and water utilities in the private drive shall be City facilities, just as they
would if it were a public street right of way.
6. Park dedication of $1,665 per unit shall be paid: 18 units for a total of $29,970.
7. Landscaping plan shall include one additional Black Hills spruce directly north of the guest
parking stalls between units 16 and 17 for a total of six. The trees to be planted in the
southwest corner, behind units 9, 10, and 11, must be located so as not to interfere with the
stormwater pipe there.
8. The project must adhere to permit requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. The
permit must be obtained before the City will approve the final plat.
9. A street light and stop sign shall be added at the access to 79th St., at the developer's cost.
10. Building elevations submitted June 30, 2004 are acceptable as long as they include vinyl
shake in gable ends on all sides.
11. Association declarations /covenants shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review prior to
final plat approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that his approval is based on the following:
Existing Conditions Plan, received June 30, 2004
Preliminary Plat, received June 30, 2004
Preliminary Grading & Erosion Control Plan, received June 30, 2004
Preliminary Utility Plan, received June 30, 2004
Tree Preservation Plan, received June 30, 2004
Landscape Plan, received June 30, 2004
Building Elevations, received June 30, 2004
- 53 -
Resolution 04 -57, page 2
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004.
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 54 -
Resolution 04 -57, page 3
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 08-04
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
ON OUTLOT A, HIGHLAND MEADOWS EAST, TO PROVIDE FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHLAND MEADOWS EAST 2ND ADDITION
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1 Findings
The City Council makes the following findings:
1. The development of Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition, as approved by Resolution 04 -57,
requires the vacation of a drainage and utility easement dedicated with the Highland
Meadows East plat.
2. The easements are described in Attachment A.
• 3. Development plans for the Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition plat provide for adequate
stormwater management for the site and the existing drainage and utility easement is
therefore unnecessary.
4. The City Council held a public hearing on the proposed vacation on July 26, 2004.
Section 3
The drainage and utility easement described herein is hereby vacated.
Section 4
Any person, corporation or city owning or controlling easements contained upon the property
vacated reserves the right to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto.
Section 5
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according
to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
- 5 6 - Ordinance 08 -04, page 2
•
ATTACHMENT A TO LINO LAKES ORDINANCE 08 -04
Legal Description of Drainage and Utility Easement to Be Vacated
•
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
rr ro
H GHLAN
1,4i;-- 2 5 6
HIGH
rr
5
3
s/7
10
m
7
2
8
I0
21
J
1
BARB "RA LANE
7
•
•
Proposed Land Use Plan
Comprehensive Plan
MUSA line
Low Density Sewered Resid.
Pub /Semi -Pub
at'
Public /Semi - Public
Medium
Density Resid.
P
- 5 9 -
•
Zoning Map
Memorandum
DATE: July 13, 2004
TO: Jeff Smyser
FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
RE: Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition
Attached is the TKDA review dated July 13, 2004, of the submitted documents for the
proposed development. The following comments must be addressed prior to final
approval given for this project.
Please contact me with any questions.
600 Town Center Parkway - 61 -akes, Minnesota 55014-1182
Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 -982 -2499 • Tflfl 651- 982 -241n
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
To:
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292 -4400
(651) 292 -0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Highland Meadows East 2nd
Addition
Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
From: Scott A. Brink, P.E.
Date: July 13, 2004
Comm. No. 12976 -002
Routing:
Reviews for this proposed development were previously provided in Memorandums dated February 26,
2004, and April 8, 2004. The City of Lino Lakes has since received revised documents providing for
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition as follows:
1. Cover Letter from James R. Hill dated June 30, 2004.
2. Revised Preliminary Plat Exhibits (8 sheets) dated June 21, 2004 ( full size and 1/2 size).
®3. Elevation Plan dated June 30,2004 (1/2 size).
4. Fax from Emmons & Oliver Resources dated June 25, 2004 regarding the Rice Creek Watershed
District Permit Application.
The proposed Plans provide for the construction of Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition, located south of
the intersection of 79th Avenue at Nancy Drive. The project essentially will include the extension of a
private drive (cul -de -sac) extending south and westerly from the intersection into the property and serving an
area of 3.5 acres with 18 proposed residential dwelling units. This property was originally included within
the bounds of a larger Highland Meadows East grading and drainage plan (encompassing 4.9 acres),
reviewed and approved in 1999. This 2nd Addition portion was previously described as Outlot A (future
multi- family) under the original approval.
Grading and Drainage Comments
1. At the time of the initial approval, 4 new single family residential properties were constructed along
the south side of 79th Avenue. A drainage pond was also constructed within the Outlot A area to
serve the entire 4.9 acres of property, including Outlot A. This pond was originally designed to
discharge to the adjacent property to the west (Highland Meadows). The original Highland Meadows
site was designed to accept this drainage, and both plans (Highland Meadows and Highland Meadows
East) were approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. However, as a result of modifications to
the original grading plan, a permit application to RCWD has been re- submitted, and a CAPROC has
been received. All conditions and requirements of the RCWD shall be completed as required prior
to commencement of grading.
-62
An Employee Owned Company Frouiuung Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
Higland Meadows East 2nd Addition Page 2 July 13, 2004
"'City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
2. As described in the previous reviews, the majority of the property's drainage is directed to the street
(private drive) and the stormwater pond along the north side of the property. No additional
stormwater shall be directed to adjacent properties.
3. The Contractor shall adhere to NPDES Phase II requirements prior to engaging in any grading
activities. The Contractor shall also submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the
City prior to engaging in grading activities.
4. The Grading Plan must provide the catch basin rim elevations on the plan. All City of Lino Lakes
standard plates for erosion control must also be provided. It should also be noted that all
construction notes for both the grading and utility plans are provided on Sheet 8 (Details and
Notes). The Grading and Utility Plans (Sheets 4 and 5) do not provide any reference to Sheet 8.
Notes specific to each type of construction (utilities or grading) shall be provided on the respective
grading and utility sheets with references as needed.
5. No geotechnical report has been submitted. According to the Anoka County Soil Survey, all existing
soils are type Soderville Type A, and no wetlands exist on the site. All dwelling units must meet the
City's minimum requirements for building elevations (low floor) with relation to groundwater and
detention basin high water elevations. This would include 4 feet above normal water levels
(including groundwater and detention basins), 2 feet above design flood elevations, and 1 foot above
emergency overflows. Existing information provided would suggest that the building elevations
meet the minimum separations required. However, because groundwater levels often may
fluctuate, it is strongly recommended that the Applicant's engineer and contractor monitor
groundwater levels during the course of construction to assure compliance. In addition, the
emergency overflow elevation and location for the infiltration basin should be further verified.
Surrounding elevations suggest that the EOF as shown may not be correct.
Utility Plans
1. As stated in the previous review memorandum, the utility plan is incomplete and must provide
substantially more detail. More specifically, the water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer will be
owned and maintained by the City of Lino Lakes. Therefore, the plans must provide complete
design information, including plan and profile view, invert and rim elevations, services, pipe sizes,
slopes, materials, stationing, etc. All City of Lino Lakes standard plates for all utility structures,
appurtenances, services, etc. must also be provided.
2. As previously mentioned in the grading comments, all construction notes for both the grading and
utilities are provided on Sheet 8 (Details and Notes). The Grading and Utility Plans (Sheets 4 and
5) do not provide notes referring to Sheet 8. It is required that notes specific to each type of
construction (utilities or grading) be provided on the respective grading and utility sheets.
-63-
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition Page 3 July 13, 2004
OCity of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Additional Comments:
1. The proposed street serving the property is designated as a private drive. However, the utilities
(sanitary sewer and water) shall be maintained by the City of Lino Lakes. Therefore, the property
owners or local association shall be responsible for maintaining the street, including snowplowing,
street repairs, and other needs. The public utilities shall be constructed per the standards and
requirements of the City of Lino Lakes. Ownership and maintenance responsibilities must be spelled
out very clearly in the City/Developer Agreement, and a written agreement designating responsibility
to the homeowners or local association as appropriate must be provided and recorded with each
property. The private drive is included as part of Lot 19, and all of Lot 19 is designated as drainage
and utility easement to cover the City utilities.
Lot 19 covers the entire perimeter of the property with the exception of at Lot 2 which extends to
the property line. It is suggested that a l0 foot drainage and utility easement be provided along the
property line boundary across Lot 2 in order to provide adequate maintenance access across the
entire property.
2. The City's standard width (minimum) for a residential street is 28 feet (back of curb to back of curb).
The street as shown is 26 feet. In addition, the City's maximum length for a cul -de -sac (500 feet) also
is exceeded by roughly 75 feet. However, if the street is to be private and maintained by others, the
City may choose to waive the above standards as appropriate. The roadway sub -base must also be
an acceptable compacted granular as approved by the City Engineer.
3. The utility plan provides for connecting water and sewer to existing facilities at 79th Street. A new
gate valve must be provided at the watermain connection at 79th Street.
4. As previously mentioned, services shall be shown on the plans. If the housing units are intended to
be townhomes, individual services to each unit must be provided.
5. The Plan shall be subject to the review of the City Fire Chief, including the number and location of
hydrants.
6. The amount of fill/cover over all sewer and water service pipes shall be a minimum bury depth of 8
feet, and shall be insulated per City of Lino Lakes standards if the minimum cover cannot be attained.
7. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum
Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum
Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet.
8. A minimum of two feet of cover over storm sewer pipe is desired.
9. A landscape plan has been submitted. Some planting locations may require adjustment as a result of
locations directly over underground utilities such as storm sewer.
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition Page 4 July 13, 2004
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
10. Any existing well and septic locations on both the subject property and adjoining properties shall be
confirmed to assure compliance with the Minnesota Department Health. This shall mean that any
existing facilities on the subject property shall be removed or capped in accordance with regulations,
and that sewer separation distances from any remaining facilities in close proximity shall be attained.
The separation distance shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota
Department of Health.
11. The plan provides notes regarding seeding, mulching and turf establishment for disturbed areas.
However, the City of Lino Lakes has a specific seed specification for ponding areas and a note
referring to City of Lino Lakes seeding specifications shall also be provided on the plan.
12. Because much of the site is currently low and depressed, it is expected that it will be necessary to
import significant amounts of fill material. All imported fill material shall be subject to the approval
of the City Engineer.
Memo
Environmental
To: Jeff Smyser
CC: Michael Grochala
From: Marty Asleson
Date: January 30, 2004
Re: Recommendations of the February 25, 2004 Environmental Board Meeting
The Environmental Board met on February 24, 2004 and made the following
recommendations:
Rice Creek Covenant Church
Land Cover
. The developer needs to submit a tree preservation plan, and follow the
subdivision ordinance for tree preservation plans.
• We have identified a few rare -plant conditions on the southern part of the site.
Environmental would like time to verify the presence or absence of rare plants. If
found, the Environmental Board would like some flexibility in design.
• Northern residential site grade plan indicates most of the aspen vegetation on the
East Side proposed for removal (Attachment 1). Properties to the West also have
rare plant indicators. Since nitrogen (lawn fertilizer runoff) has been shown to
remove biodiversity, and Aspen buffers act as good filters for runoff, the
Environmental Board would like the developer to look at ways to maintain more of
this Aspen edge. The water from this area flows to the East. The Environmental
Board would like to see a 50 foot buffer in this area. The Environmental Board
would like to see signage at wetlands and drainage areas informing "no- dumping,
cutting or filling."
Lighting
• . No -spill lighting should be. used. Lights should be tumed off after activities are
done.
•
Soils
• There should be no importing or exporting of soils without City approval. The
developer should include a plan for soil compaction prevention outside of
construction limits.
Surface Water
• Would like RCWD input on wetland delineation, particularly on the developer
delineation line on the northern part of the Plat. NWI shows quite a larger area
surrounding the delineated area with facultative wetland.
• Developer should submit the required NPDES control measures and best
management practices. Additional rock stockpile should be on hand for when
rock entrance fills in.
• Depressional area in the parking lot should be graded so water flows to it.
Landscaping
• The City native seed specification should be used in all rain pond areas, or potted
plants installed with sufficient mulch to attenuate weed growth.
Parking
• Look at reducing parking as much as possible since proposed parking is at more
than the minimum.
Motion by O'Dea, 2nd Bor to approve Marshan Estates with Environmental
Board comments and recommendations. Motion was approved with all in
favor.
Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition
Tree Preservation
The Environmental Board would like the developer to make final determination of
some of the trees marked for removal only after further discussion /field meeting with
City Environmental and Engineer.
Soils
• Importing or exporting of soils without City permission should be prohibited. Soils
should be of similar nature to what was removed.
• A plan should be submitted on methods to be used to prevent compaction to soil
areas outside of the construction limits. This includes the remaining tree areas.
Parking
• Reduce overflow parking if possible.
Landscaping
• The developer should show more landscape materials to buffer neighboring
areas.
• More oaks should be used.
• Colorado spruce and Austrian pine should be. eliminated. If evergreens are
necessary, than white pine, Red pine or White spruce should be used.
City native seed specs should be used in drainage and pond areas. If ground
vegetation is changed in the remaining tree areas, native seed mix should be
used here as well. Sod will not grow in this heavy -shade type of a situation. A
contractor experienced in establishment of native seed needs to be employed to
manage these areas for the first 3 years. The City should approve this contractor.
Open Space
• The Environmental Board wants the developer to demonstrate the project meets
the 50% pervious requirement for PUD.
Motion to approve with staff and Environmental Board recommendations and
comments made by O'dea, 2nd by Grundhoffer. All were in favor, motion
approved.
• Page 3
-68-
NO]'ONII f90NMe r1NI13
Ion-awns) 4 M09-066(666) atom
6 MI B VZI 33216 7, 33B'330'N atc,
I VIII / S DN3�+� SN3NNtlld
` e'111]r
sewer
erccr 660611 root, cvi 1 o
CONS Y1OS3NNIM OOONO '10010 300000 ER
'MC ax aoz�n�a NISI
L3�IS dIIIL
MOOtwrv's3HVl win
NOI,LIUGV QNZ ,LSVa SMOQViY' QNV'IHDIH
m
°o
a�
i
s
1111
CAD FILE
2138175
z
'
o
'iH
�N
/J�
r6
:;w:;
ADDITION
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303
FAX: (763) 576 -9122
SHEET INDEX
0.
2
.
F a> r o
0. 0. W
.ti 00 00 < 00 t0 0-
lo
n
i.:;4
n 1 \/
110.39M19603NO9f 11VM3
1129 - 0691256) xrd 4409-069(ZS6) Wild
911 3..429 3121 41,6 72 '22 u0 21 OOSL
lfS / Sd3N19N3 / 5213NNVld
OA
11I11 a Saltier (
•
MSS Y1053101M YMIMY '11i1LLS 3041011 LLL
71`II JH�%dO Z�� Q �S 'T
SNOLLIQN00 anima
Yso53M1n %awn own
NOILIQQV UN2 .1.57Z SAOCITH11 QNVIH0IH
m o
„
S W
11111111IF
,r-.',
0 Z ,
I -03 NO. I
SHEET 2 OF 9
mr ,wt.b 1r40Lgi
�/y rw
..,,,„„r,„a...
1^1_7
•
•
1
9
0
CJ
c'1
\l
i
Ce C9„ 0
0Qk a 0 \� 0 �,\ 0
0 Q
1 \0 \,\ I\ 00 r
i�
1 \ \ 0 1
\ \ I \ \
\ / \ 0 1 \\
�' \ \I ®G1` \.)
0
a n ' (!)
„I 0°S Llf
2
ui
it
.11 1 ==
11
1
r=:
1 \\
\ \ \11 �
)jI11
,;VIII
I 1 II
II
1
1 1
II
1 1 I 1
1 1 1 1
1 1
0 1 1
.r lit 1
I I 1
1 I i 1
1 \1 \\__\�\ �. :, 1 1 I ,S
\_— `•, \lj� 1 " \ \1�g1
— — —
I 1111 1 1 1 1 1
4 1 1 111 (I_= =1== =- - - -- __�__��� i 1 I
)11111 1
1i1 1 /. -•, ) 1
—
00 %0 \Itl i i1;j j 1 0
g,s,o 00 top 41 �\ / / /0j I 0
`° 0 00° 4a -�-� -1 0 0 00„
0 ao 8 6 8 El
—
G
i^—irA -A-2ti+crt3ini :IT:r 1H:)11-1 ,.-- 1
iJ_71r1 �� ,:rnvvv .r r� :IT,: �
��� \ \\ 11 I I// /
mod Willi %1 ,
1 �I-`
ci 11 t
1 1 It
G) g
11033NIKI00MW*P 11V %3
YYZ9-0fiBI[56) T'3 005- 069(ZSfi) 3N0Hd
IIN 3ltwol8 b21 1005 71 aS 'uO 31 OOSZ
3A21N5 / SN33NIJN3 / SN3NNVld
`IIIH •H sewer
\
J \\
— 47r...0 tea/ 21/1 .0
CUSS Y1053NNIII'YM0NY'133tl1S 30,91019 CZL
,LN3NtdO/l3Q YtSIL
ypa
NV'Id 'IO2I.LN00 NOISOtI3 3d JNIQVZIO 'YII'I32id
053NNIN.S3NY10
NOLLIQQV (NZ ,LSV3 SMOQV3341 QNV'IxOIH
■ DRAWN BY I
I RYA
W!....,.
`c
yl
s
I CAD FILE I
21301PG
Z
r A
d
FILE NO.
2 -03 -039
';a;
,.,
z � -L
11
.II
izrakkkkkk
eNcec @c
e
tar
g
E; F F FF F F F r $ F
E W 8 WWW Wltl dwa
6, 0
0r
6
PT
TIP
ak
I 31
it
1'
IW
II
X15
°00 N4
i
`v
a�B
1 % •
11001111APODNIHIF rINVI3
tne-onass) ,XY4 Y109-068456) WWI
• " ....NI 10ZI .15 Lt 11, up x 002
3A2111S / S833N101,13 / Sel3NNVld
(
II! ' Wer
H H
—unr-oor.s t.
MSS .353.,1 SNOW 1.33U1.5 300011 tEL
IlandOlaAga HSI
h.
Wild LIZILLI1 AlIVNIYirlaad
Nomaav a Isva sikoavayz cuirmom
: R
E
■
0
i
11101111
I CAD FILE I
21381PU
! 'A
g-,
.
g 2 6.
0 ■-
.i
el e
. ....,;".7='.....'4.
"
.:rZFEE„Air,,.
8
,
4
C\1
C
•
a
R03'3NINR03NINM I1NN3
11Z9-06eIZS6) 10J H09-068456) 9NONd
6 NW 3mNmq TV 3.15 11 nu '113 M Ace
3nafS / Sd33NIJN3 / S23NNVld
`IIIW '11 sealer
—W� v i o
�3�
[ CSC Y1OS3NNW NAM, 133515 3YNNOW ZLL
,LNaNdO 2Ar�Q .
'utl
NV'Id NOIZVAa3832id aaa
Y1U53NNIW'SINV13N4
NOLLIQQV aN asVa Sh OGVY GNVZxDrx
m
<�
°
_
N
CAD FILE
Z1 331W
Z _
a
_ 1.
" i
R'NeM
-•
II�IIIIIIIIII
II�
...
IIIIii311
IIIII
__.
1
IIR
.-
MMi
111
yy
a
33{{{�
5666.
1111111-11-
11
�.a�gx
i
:•
7<f:a
Mil
•i
i' "ii
�...:�.
•S.l.
_
_
-
ic°
_IIII9
A_n.-
111
I °__
•
�..._1
IIII
1111.e_
_
a �WW
S3'2'�Ed1�
EE
}
°�
8 -_,
S_.11
�D¢
��g.'�'�W����r
}
� R8
8�i
it
'��F, `'d5��'m'�
RBRRRi
t.8
a.
_- --
F
1I.E
i8..
'i �8
a Ci i BR�R-
-= ^'-i-
����'��
9
B9
RER�
g�
R9
-''':
�ii
�'j
S��y�yj{'rNL7j{�
.
����
9
i
R1j�y�{�
��i ■ 1i��
�.
'-
- =�
R
iiFB
66��6'a
8
°
RYS
>:i ��
° — °R"
- _
E:
@ €Fe
IAu88RRR-
a °i�iSSEa:E:9s:1
^ °R'
_, •_
^
^9ii °R6a�aB
°Re°.S
jIii
£8
---
SR
"
i
R
:.°'.dill
�15EhAE
R RR
E" iiiiiii�
iii
- "'
iii
i
��BBR
- "siiiiiii
_
ijIfl
EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
1
•
S
1
u II
r,
r-
�I
•
41 4
0e
5. R IF `r `II
o iII
II
E F I II$ , 1 if
2 $ C E ll
II l
I A
III 1 II
k11 'I it
Ij II �
n E i( II
iii II
1 I ii
1,.e[
e II:
II 111 II ill I
1- I ll
I:
u <II
I- =II '11
f•'' II II
II )I
IctIi; I 'II Il
I II II
II I
11 . .jj I
11 it
II 11
It {)
11. 11 I
I/ '11
II: `I1
I
II 11 II
If I . 1
II
/ r 7 ia��i a � s
{! 0i - nom`/ ��
1. R I I
6 cei,. ..
III
J
IWO 3NNE0/41Wr mnn
9529- '438 d 6609- 060(A6)'ixxxd
rin m....e
UIS / S2D3NI9N3 / SifdNNVld
`lI!H •1 saucer
�%
\
- .e °u �, .
•
romc V/05.411, vxom .1.11.5 30.0. on 111
r dOrI 2U }QSL
NV'Id '3dV3SQN6'I
05Vx�•.•3>”,
MOIZIQQV QAIZ ISVa SMOQVER QiNIIIDIII
DRAWN BY
R.
e
aN
�;
w
f
:'I
J
9
sr
�'.
o�
a
'
,,,,°,� „ °!,p!.4� !�
:::we Wo y®
„� ,
011 +S
i 57
- 7 4 -
1C3911xw'07091w 1IYh3
9129- 0601LS6) 0fYJ tt09-0611(M) :3N01b
SS N0 TNC®I10 1121 ll05 It '39',10 'M OpSL
3AHfS / S)J33NI9N3 / SN3N@NVld
•
'IIIH •1' SOWBP
` ,,,m , .
SOSSS VIOS3NMN ' MMNY '1331115 30fNON xxx
SN3Nidc'IaAsa 11ISi
S�,LON 28 S1W12a
VIOS3NMI1'WW1 atm
NOIJI IUY artz ss�2 MOURN cIN IxOIH
m
i 2
C
i
.%
��
N
1
@
g@
i
3
m�i
(old
Z m
~^
0
a
Z a
'r
en
�, ..
5aMV1i own :10 )11 E0
tooE 0 v Pdfpf
0
SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT SECTION (SEWO)
Ill
a
v
r3 !1Bi
f5 AI k
6 @iV§ : . r k
giR
A ii,1 a8 € E.g.
•
AGENDA ITEM 6.G
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul F. Bengtson
C.C. MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution Number 04 -110:
Variance to allow a 3.9 -foot side yard setback for an
accessory building where 5.0 feet is required.
Curt and Kelly Monson — Bacchus Homes, Inc.
6396 Langer Lane
ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote
BACKGROUND
November 13, 2003 the City of Lino Lakes issued a single - family home — new
construction building permit to Bacchus Homes, Inc. for 6396 Langer Lane (Lot 22
Block 2 of Clearwater Creek 5th Addition). The survey submitted with the building
pen-nit application on November 5, 2003 indicated the required 5 -foot side setback for the
attached accessory structure (garage) as is required by the City of Lino Lakes Zoning
Ordinance. The penult was issued based on this proof of compliance with the zoning
code requirements.
The City of Lino Lakes requires all new construction to submit an "As- Built" survey
verifying that the structures are built to the approved specifications. In the case of the
subject property, the "As- Built" survey indicated that the attached accessory structure
(garage) had actually been built to a 3.9 -foot side setback rather than the 5 -foot side
setback as required by the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance.
The applicant is now requesting that a variance of 1.1 feet be granted from the ordinance
requirements.
This review is based on the following plan submittals:
General Location Map
Building Permit Number 0301259
Certificate of Survey (As- Built)
November 5, 2003
June 24, 2004
•
Bacchus Variance
July 14, 2004
page 2
ANALYSIS
Land Use and Zoning
The following table summarizes the zoning and land use of the subject property, as well
as surrounding properties:
Setback Requirements
Section 6, Subdivision 1 of the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance requires a 5 -foot
side setback for all accessory structures. The applicant was issued permits for the subject
site based on a survey submitted with the building application that met this
requirement. Construction of the single - family dwelling was completed and the "As-
Built" survey of the property indicated that the 5 -foot setback was no longer being met.
Specifically, a variance to allow a 3.9 -foot side setback where 5 feet is required is now
being requested by the builder post construction. The property line for which the setback
variance is being requested adjoins a community open space and thus the distance
between dwellings will not be significantly reduced.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
The above report was presented to the Planning and Zoning board at the July 14th
meeting. After consideration of the issues, the board voted to recommend approval of the
proposed variance.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Resolution 04 -110 and the proposed Variance.
2. Deny Resolution 04 -110 and the proposed Variance.
3. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Resolution ^7 8 ' 0 and this Variance request.
Location
Guided Land Use
Existing Zoning
Subject Property
Low Density, Sewered
Residential
R-1 (Single Family Residential)
PDO (Planned Development Overlay)
North
Low Density, Sewered
Residential
R -1 (Single Family Residential)
PDO (Planned Development Overlay)
East
Low Density, Sewered
Residential
R -1 (Single Family Residential)
PDO (Planned Development Overlay)
South
Low Density, Sewered
Residential
R -1 (Single Family Residential)
PDO (Planned Development Overlay)
West
Low Density, Sewered
Residential
R -1 (Single Family Residential)
PDO (Planned Development Overlay)
Setback Requirements
Section 6, Subdivision 1 of the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance requires a 5 -foot
side setback for all accessory structures. The applicant was issued permits for the subject
site based on a survey submitted with the building application that met this
requirement. Construction of the single - family dwelling was completed and the "As-
Built" survey of the property indicated that the 5 -foot setback was no longer being met.
Specifically, a variance to allow a 3.9 -foot side setback where 5 feet is required is now
being requested by the builder post construction. The property line for which the setback
variance is being requested adjoins a community open space and thus the distance
between dwellings will not be significantly reduced.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
The above report was presented to the Planning and Zoning board at the July 14th
meeting. After consideration of the issues, the board voted to recommend approval of the
proposed variance.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Resolution 04 -110 and the proposed Variance.
2. Deny Resolution 04 -110 and the proposed Variance.
3. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Resolution ^7 8 ' 0 and this Variance request.
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04-110
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE
ALLOWING A 3.9 FOOT SIDE SETBACK FOR AN ACCESSORY BUILDING
WHERE 5 FEET IS REQUIRED
WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Variance requesting that an
attached accessory building be sited 3.9 feet from the side lot line, and
WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance, in Section 6, subd. 1.B.4.c., requires accessory
buildings to be sited a minimum of 5 feet from any side lot line, and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves
the proposed Variance, as described in the attached staff report, dated July 26, 2004
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of July, 2004.
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
6396 Langer Lane
1 � or'
y
y,
ROAD AS\J
■ \
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
for
BACCHUS HOMES, INC.
Denotes Wood Stake Set
For Excavation Only
Denotes Surface Drainage
Denotes Proposed Elevation
x Denotes Existing Elevation
929.6 Top of Block Devotion ® House
928.2. Top of Block Elevation 0 Garage
927.8 Garoge Floor Elevation
924.7 Top of Block 0 Lookout Window Sill
921.5 Lowest Floor Elevation
Type of Building: A Wood Frame House
Benchmark: T.N.N. ® Lot 75, Block 3
Elevation = 927.81
ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS
AND FLOOR ELEVATIONS MUST
BE VERIFIED BY BUILDER.
LOWEST POSSIBLE OPENING
ELEVATION = 924.5 PER
GRADING PLAN.
921.9
921.1
Scale: 1" = 30'
• Denotes iron pipe monument found,
marked "RLS 10947 ".
The orientation of this Bearing System
is based upon the recorded plat of
CLEARWATER CREEK 517-I ADDITION.
924.1
/5
/ \\\
\4X
Proposed Contours
/- per Grading Pion
>
91,
926.0
k•
6r\
Frye `f/ �x 926 `y x E;1.1`)/
925.0
7
f 925.0
924.7 /
co
922.7
924.0 h '5
9
9
r ryktil
924.4
/
/
tco/
Lot 22, Block 2,
CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION,
Anoka County, Minnesota.
FD
11- /o - ,2_no3
Proposed
House
(927.5)
925.2
co
r (927.8)
(garage)
\
\
To <
925.'0 1
o(or /// 4')
//
•
4 / / }')
// ✓j /yh'LEC.
T �, /Proposed /
/ Additional
326.3 Contour
Top of
Elev.= 927.Hub 11
/0
csox
A
O O�
d•o�Pd
925.
24.0
Top of Hub
lev.= 925.34
924.77
925.5
7/0
924.99
r� Gos
Marker
T/�925.09 C
925
/c
925.6E
,P i0
Job No.
MIDWEST
Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc.
710 East River Road.
Anoka, . MN. 55303
Ph. 763- 712 -9099 Fax: 763- 712 -9055
03 -377 Book -Pee,. Orr a ra- n x_ 2.77
1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was' prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that 1 am o duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of
the State of Minnesota.
and
No certification whatsoever is extended to subsequent owners, mortgooees or title
insurers, unless this surrey has been related for this purpose by the surveyor.
Dated this 3rd day of November 2003.
-81- iL /f
1 .....
• ��--- Registration No. 25343 •
es E Napier - Minhdsata Licensed Land Surveyor
It it
\s t3DLLT
CERTIFIa4TE OF SURVEY
Denotes Wood Stake Set for
For Excavation Only �r�^► TT�r j /�
Denotes Surface Drainage BAC FIU„7 HOMES, INC.
Denotes Proposed Elevation
Denotes Existing Elevation
929.8
Top of Block Elevation ® House
929.0
Top of Block Elevation Garage
928.6
827.0 Garage Floor Elevation
924.9
Top of Block @ Lookout Window Sill
921.7
021.5 Lowest Floor Elevation
Type of Building: A Wood Frame House
Benchmark: T.N.H. Lot 15, Block 3
Elevation = 927.81
45-0.,--D Denotes asbuilt elevation
ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS
AND FLOOR ELEVATIONS MUST
BE VERIFIED BY BUILDER.
LOWEST POSSIBLE OPENING
ELEVATION = 924.5 PER
GRADING PLAN.
Proposed Contours
/— per Grading Plan
Cgl'4
5
•
x
Scale: 1" _ 30'
0 Denotes iron pipe monument found,
marked "RLS 10947 ".
The orientation of this Bearing System
is based upon the recorded plat of
CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION.
923.6 \\
Lot 22, Block 2,
CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION,
Anoka County, Minnesota.
\ 57-
\ec9
(927.9)
924.0 \\
G4
�..C`iyc c . PC 925.09
4
// 924.99
asp
924.77
925.66
MIDWEST
Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc.
710 East River Rood.
Anoka, MN. 55303
Ph. 763- 712 -9099 Fax: 763-712-9055
Job No. 03-377
ook —Page DCF Acod File 03 -377
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of
the State of Minnesota
and
No certification whatsoever is' extended to subsequent owners, mortgagees or title
insurers, unless this survey has been redoted for this purpose by the surveyor.
Dated this 3rd dayrof. ._.. November ' '•:
2003.
8 2 Registration No, 25343
James E. Napier - Minnesota Licensed Land Surveyor
Asbuilt ✓ Dated this 28th
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6 H
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: Second Reading: Ordinance 18 -04,
Rezoning From Rural to R-1X
Junes Addition
VOTE: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 18 -04 on July 12. This is the
second reading.
The property currently has a home and barn. Mr. Junes' property currently is zoned
Rural and the rezoning changes it to R -1X, Single Family Executive. This is consistent
with the neighboring West Shadow Ponds neighborhood.
Once approved, this ordinance will be published next week and become effective 30 days
from publication, as required by the city charter.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 18 -04, approving the rezoning.
2. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
-83-
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 18 -04
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM RURAL (R)
TO RESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE (R -1X) FOR THE JUNES ADDITION
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1: Findings
The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the
property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd.1 E of the Lino
Lakes Zoning Ordinance:
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies
and provisions of and has found to be consistent with the official City
Comprehensive Plan. The project complies with the land use in the
Comprehensive Plan: the site is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential
use. Final platting will not occur until 2005 due to the requirements of the
growth management policy. The project will be consistent with both the
MUSA and units /per year limitations of the growth management policy.
2. The proposed use is, or will be, compatible with present and future land uses
of the area. The site is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential uses.
Land to the south is guided Low Density Unsewered Residential. Land to the
west, north and east is also guided Low Density Sewered Residential. With
sewer availability and with the improvements to 62nd Street, these lots are
ready to be converted to Residential Sewered.
3. Upon compliance with the conditions of approval in Resolution 04 -94, the
proposed use will conform with all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance and other requirements. The lots proposed meet the
requirements and standards of the R -1X District.
4. The proposed use can be accommodated by existing public services and will
not place undue burden on the City's service capacity. Sanitary sewer service
will be available on 62nd Street with completion of the road reconstruction
this year. Water service will also be available with completion of this road
construction. Both systems have adequate capacity.
•
•
•
5. Traffic generation by the proposed lots is within the capabilities of streets
serving the properties. All lots will be served by the newly constructed 62nd
Street, which can easily handle the additional traffic.
Section 2
The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed
by the City Council on March 23, 2003, is hereby amended by rezoning from Rural to
R1 -X, Single Family Executive, pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate:
The south 650.00 feet of the East half of the West half of the Southwest
quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 32, EXCEPT the West 100.00
feet thereof, and EXCEPT the South 40.00 feet thereof; AND
the South 430.00 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southwest
quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 32, EXCEPT the South 40.00
feet thereof.
All in Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota
Section 3
As amended above, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and
previously amended.
Section 4
This Ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2004.
Attest:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 8 5 -
Ordinance 18 -04, page 2
•
AGENDA ITEM 61
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 - 104, Authorizing Execution of Development
Agreement, Marshan Estates
Vote Required: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the preliminary plat of Marshan Estates on March 8, 2004.
Marshan Estates is an existing 4.94 acre site which will be subdivided into 5 parcels and
6 outlots.
In accordance with the preliminary plat approval and City policy, staff has prepared a
Development Agreement for the Marshan Estates Subdivision. The agreement provides
for the following:
1. Submittal by the developer of a Letter of Credit in the amount of $38,500.00
representing 35 percent of the City improvement costs to insure completion of
the project in accordance with the approved plans.
2. Deposit of a cash escrow in the amount of $10,970.00 to reimburse the City for
costs incurred by the City related to the development and improvements of the
site and developer improvements.
Clyde Rehbein has reviewed the contract and is aware of the conditions set forth.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 — 104, Authorizing Execution of Development
Agreement, Marshan Estates Subdivision.
3. Not adopt Resolution Number 04 - 104.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution Number 04 - 104 be adopted.
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 - 104
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, MARSHAN
ESTATES SUBDIVISION.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Marshan Estates Subdivision on
March 8, 2004, and
WHEREAS, the City's subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution of
a development contract, between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes, prior to
commencement of site construction activities and final plat approval to insure satisfactory
completion of public improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves the
Development Contract with Clyde Rehbein for Marshan Estates Subdivision and authorizes the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the city.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of July, 2004.
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
Marshan Estates
THIS AGREEMENT made this 26th day of July, 2004, is by and between the City of
Lino Lakes, whose address is 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, 55014, a
municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as
the "City ", and Clyde Rehbein, 5618 Heather Ridge Court, Shoreview, Minnesota, 55126,
hereinafter referred to as the "Developer".
WHEREAS, the Developer has received approval from the City Council for a plat
of land within the corporate limits of the City known as Marshan Estates, hereinafter called
"Subdivision "; said land is legally described to -wit
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range
22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence
North 00 degrees, 04 minutes, East, assumed bearing along the east line thereof 269.91 feet to the
point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 66 degrees, 01 minute West 212.56
feet; thence South 23 degrees, 59 minutes West 91 feet to the center of a 50 foot radius cul -de-
sac; thence South 13 degrees, 59 minutes West 281.87 feet to a point on the south line of said
Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter distant 1013.21 east from the southwest comer thereof;
thence South 89 degrees, 56 minutes West along said south line 65.80 feet; thence North 02
degrees, 25 minutes West 38.11 feet; thence North 02 degrees, 39 minutes East 28.5 feet; thence
North 28 degrees, 47 minutes West 75 feet; thence North 46 degrees, 56 minutes West 35.5 feet;
thence North 23 degrees, 10 minutes West 58.00 feet; thence North 40 degrees, 40 minutes West
39.00 feet; thence North 46 degrees, 19 minutes West 61.00 feet; thence North 71 degrees, 17
minutes West 30.00 feet; thence North 54 degrees, 16 minutes West 39.50 feet; thence North 78
degrees, 56 minutes West 53.95 feet; thence North 21 degrees, 42 minutes,12 second East 202.62
feet; thence North 65 degrees, 56 minutes, 34 seconds West 198.03 feet to the southeasterly
right -of -way line of Old Trunk Highway No. 8; thence North 24 degrees, 56 minutes East 283.96
feet along said right -of -way line to a point distant 938.14 feet northeasterly from the south line of
said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter as measured along said right -of -way line; thence
South 66 degrees, 23 minutes East 242.6 feet; thence South 24 degrees, 14 minutes West 213.98
-88-
•
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
feet; thence South 67 degrees, 07 minutes East 526.24 feet to the east line of said Southeast
Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees, 04 minutes West along said east line
84.85 feet to the point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the Developer requested that the City construct and finance certain
improvements to service the plat; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of
certain private improvements within the plat; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 429 provides a method for assessing the cost of City
installed improvements to the benefited property.
WHEREAS, the City Subdivision Ordinance and Minnesota Statute 462.358
authorize the City to enter into a performance contract secured by cash escrow or other security to
guarantee completion and payment of such improvements following final approval and recording of
final plat; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made
herein,
IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PAR111ES HERETO: that the
I. DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS
A. Improvements to be installed at the Developer's expense by the Developer as
hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to as "Developer Improvements ".
Improvements to be installed by the City and financed by the Developer are
hereinafter referred to as "City Improvements ".
DEVELOPER'S IMPROVEMENTS
A. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare, at the Developer's expense, a grading plan
and a surface water management plan. The Developer shall secure a contractor to
install the site grading and erosion control; the City at its ABSOLUTE discretion
shall approve said contractor. All Developer improvements shall require City
inspection and approval and, where appropriate, the approval of any other
governmental agency having jurisdiction. The Developer will construct and install at
Developer's expense the following improvements according to the following terms
and conditions:
1. Grading Plan
•
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
a) A final site grading plan, including certified wetland delineation,
with maximum two -foot contours and cross sections as necessary
shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to commencement
of any site grading.
Building Permit Applications shall include a grading plan in
conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. Erosion Control Plan
a) The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all
erosion control measures to be implemented during construction.
The City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction
shall approve said plan.
The Developer shall submit a Turf Establishment Plan which details
topsoil placement, seeding, sodding, mulching, fertilizing and
watering. The City prior to the commencement of site grading or
construction shall approve said plan.
Tree Preservation Plan
a) Building Peimit Application shall include a tree preservation plan.
b) Existing trees shall be pruned and/or thinned to conform to the
National Fire Wise Standards subject to the review of the City
Forester.
Grading and Erosion Control Construction & Maintenance
a) Prior to the commencement of lot grading and erosion control, the
Developer shall also complete items II.A.1, II.A.2, and II.A.3 as
listed above.
Lots shall be graded to within 0.2 foot of the grades shown on the
approved grading plan. No deviations will be allowed unless a
revised plan is submitted and approved by the City and all other
regulatory agencies.
All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented
by the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the
best potential for preventing soil erosion.
d) Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the
different stages of development. Appropriate control measures as
•
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
g)
required by the City shall be installed prior to development when
necessary to control erosion.
Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that
adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as
construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land shall be
exposed at any one period of time.
Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soil shall be set aside
for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be
restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality
at least equal to the soil quality prior to development.
All disturbed areas shall be seeded.
h) Drainage swales, ditches, storm water storage ponds and other high -
risk erosion areas shall be protected from erosion.
i) All remaining grading must be completed and certified by a Licensed
Professional Engineer or Land Surveyor prior to issuance of building
permits. This certification shall be in writing with supporting
documentation also submitted.
J)
Protect streets from erosion deposits.
5. The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block comers and at
all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed
after all street and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve the
lot markers for future property owners. Lot corner irons on the back
property line shall be installed so that the top of the iron corresponds to the
finished ground elevation in accordance with the approved grading plan -
guard stakes shall be appropriately installed to mark these irons. Horizontal
right -of -way and easement control will be provided such that it is available
for construction staking by the City.
The Developer shall promptly clear dirt and debris from Marshan Lane
resulting from grading or home construction by the Developer, its agents or
assigns within five (5) days after notification by the City.
7. The Developer shall dedicate to the City, prior to approval of the final plat,
at no cost to the City, all permanent or temporary easements necessary for
the construction and installation of the Developer's Improvements as
determined by the City. All such easements required by the City shall be in
writing, in recordable form, containing such terms and conditions, as the
City shall determine.
•
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
8. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all site grading and
development approvals and permits from all appropriate Federal, State,
Regional and Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site grading
or construction and prior to the City awarding construction contracts for
public utilities.
9. The Developers shall make provision that all gas, telephone, cable TV and
electric utility designs be submitted to the City for review and approval prior
to construction of the streets. Following review and approval by the City,
the Developer shall insure that all installation comply with applicable City,
County and State design standards and show proof of security arrangements
with said utility companies.
10. Cost of Developer's Improvements and description are as shown on
Attachments A and B.
11. Construction of Developer's Improvements:
a) The City shall in accordance with the plans and specifications
approve the construction, installation, materials and equipment.
All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and
approval of the City and, where appropriate, any other governmental
agency having jurisdiction.
Prior to the acceptance of Developer Improvements by the City, the
Developer shall obtain final plat approval and record the final plat
which will dedicate all permanent easements necessary for the
construction and installation of the Developer's and City's
Improvements as determined by the City.
All Construction debris and trash shall be properly disposed of at the
developer's expense and in a timely manner as determined by the
City.
III. CITY'S IMPROVEMENTS
The City shall install the following described improvements to serve the
Subdivision on the terms and conditions herein set forth:
1. Sanitary sewer, trunks, laterals or extensions, including all necessary
building services and other appurtenances. Services to terminate inside
right -of -way.
2 Water trunks, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services
and other appurtenances. Services to terminate inside right -of -way.
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
3. Storm sewers when deemed necessary by the City Engineer, including all
necessary laterals, catch basins and inlets. Does not include control
structures.
4. Street construction limited to aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter,
bituminous base and bituminous wear course.
Construction Procedures
1. All City improvements above shall be instituted, constructed and financed as
follows: the City shall commence proceedings pursuant to Minnesota
Statute 429 and City Charter providing that such improvements be made and
assessed against the benefited properties. After preparation of preliminary
plans and estimates by the City Engineer, an improvement hearing, if
required by law, will be called by the City Council for the purpose of
ordering such City Improvements. After preparation of the final plans and
specifications by the City Engineer, bids will be taken by the City and
contract awarded for the installation of City Improvements under the City's
complete supervision.
Security, Levy of Special Assessments and Required Payment Therefore.
1. Prior to the preparation of final plans and specifications for the construction
of said City Improvements, the Developer shall provide to the City a cash
escrow or letter of credit in an amount equal to thirty -five (35 %) percent of
the total estimated assessments as established by the City Engineer. (See
Attachment B)
2. Said letter of credit or cash escrow including accrued interest thereon, may
be used by the City upon default by Developer in the payment of special
assessments pursuant hereto, whether accelerated or otherwise. That such
cash escrow or letter of credit shall remain in full force and effect throughout
the term of the special assessments, except, the amount of such escrow or
letter of credit may be reduced, upon the request of the Developer, at the
City's option, but in no event shall be less than 35% of the outstanding
special assessments against all properties within the Subdivision. The entire
cost of the installation of such City Improvements, including any reasonable
engineering, legal and administrative costs incurred by the City, shall be
assessed against the benefited properties within the Subdivision in
accordance with City policy existing the date of this agreement, in equal
annual principal installments plus interest on the unpaid installments at a
rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law.
3. All special assessments levied hereto shall be payable to the City Clerk in
semi -annual installments over fifteen (15) years commencing on April 15 of
•
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
the year after the levy of such assessment and on each September 15 and
April 15 thereafter until the entire balance plus accrued interest is paid in full
unless paid earlier. In the alternative, the City, at its option, may certify the
entire assessment roll to the Anoka County Auditor for collection with the
Real Estate Taxes. In the event any payment is not made on the dates set out
herein, the City may exercise its rights granted hereunder for such default.
The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to
the installation of the City Improvements and the special assessments,
including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the
assessments exceed the benefit to the property. In the event the total of all
City Installed Improvements is less than originally estimated by the City
Engineer in the feasibility report or on Attachment A, Developer waives any
appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. 429.081.
Required Payments of Special Assessments by Developer.
1. Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns hereby agrees that within thirty
(30) days after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a residence on a
lot located within the Subdivision which is assessed for the cost of such City
Improvements, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns, agrees, at its
own cost and expense, to pay the entire unpaid City Improvement Costs
assessed or to be assessed under this agreement against such property.
2. If a certificate of occupancy is issued before the special assessments have
been levied, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns shall pay the City
the sum of cash equal to one hundred twenty percent (120 %) of the
Engineer's estimate of the special assessments for such City Improvements
that would be levied against the property. Upon such payment the City shall
issue a certificate showing the assessments are paid in full. Notwithstanding
the issuance of said certificate, the Developer shall be liable to the City for
any deficiency and the City shall pay the Developer any surplus arising from
the payment based upon such estimate. Developer will be paid interest on
all assessments paid before the levy of such assessments by the City at the
bond interest rates paid by the City.
E. Acceleration Upon Default.
1. In the event the Developer violates any of the covenants, conditions or
agreements herein contained to be performed by the Developer, violates any
ordinance, rule or regulation of the City, County of Anoka, State of
Minnesota or other governmental entity having jurisdiction over the plat, or
fails to pay any installment of any special assessment levied pursuant hereto,
or any interest thereon, when the same is to be paid pursuant hereto, the City
at its option, in addition to its rights and remedies hereunder, after ten (10)
days' written notice to the Developer, may declare all of the unpaid special
•
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
assessments which are then estimated or levied pursuant to this agreement
due and payable in full, with interest. The City may seek recovery of such
special assessments due and payable from the security provided herein. In
the event that such security is insufficient to pay the outstanding amount of
such special assessments plus accrued interest the City may certify such
outstanding special assessments in full to the County Auditor pursuant to
M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3 for collection the following year. The City, at its
option, may commence legal action against the Developer to collect the
entire unpaid balance of the special assessments then estimated or levied
pursuant hereto, with interest, including reasonable attorney's fees, and
Developer shall be liable for such special assessments and, if more than one,
such liability shall be joint and several. Also, if Developer violates any term
or condition of this agreement, or if any payment is not made by Developer
pursuant to this agreement the City, at its option, may refuse to issue
building permits to any of the property within the plat on which the
assessments have not been paid.
RECORD]NG AND RET EASE
A. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a
covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees
that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with
the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. This
shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Page 1 hereof. City shall
provide to Developer upon payment of all the special assessments levied against a
parcel a release of such parcel from the terms and conditions of this Development
Contract subject to provisions contained in this contract.
REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
The Developer agrees to establish a non - interest bearing escrow account with the
City in an amount determined by the City Engineer or his designee for the payment
of all costs incurred by the City related to the development of the plat and the
Developer Improvements including, but not limited to, the following (See
Attachments A and B for breakdown of costs):
1. Plat Review Fee
2. Planner Review Fee
3. Administration - 3% Construction Cost
4. Engineering
5. Legal - Plat Review
6. Publications
•
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
7. Park Dedication Fee
8. Tree Preservation Policy
9. Street - Storm Sewer - Pond Maintenance
10. Sealcoating Fund
11. FEMA Processing
12. Aerial Photo Cost Recovery
B. If the above escrow amounts are insufficient, the developer shall make such
additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to reimburse
itself from the Escrow.
BUILDING PERMITS
A. Building Permits
1. The Developer agrees that building permits for the remaining lots may be
issued upon approval of the Final Plat by the City Council at which time all
required Financial Security shall be in place with the City. The Developer
further agrees that sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and bituminous base
construction of the streets to the minimum extent of the installation of the
bituminous base and temporary street signs will be completed prior to the
issuance of the remaining building permits.
B Each lot must comply with erosion control measures to prevent any materials from
leaving the lot. The City of Lino Lakes will not perform any requested inspections
on the lot until it complies to the erosion control requirements.
C. Each lot must have a City approved Certificate of Grading showing the as-built
survey prior to an issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It shall be the
responsibility of the Developer, its purchasers, builders or contractors to ensure
compliance with the grading plan.
VII. HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
A. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours as follows:
Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed
IP
Development Contract
Marshall Estates 7 -26 -04
VIII. OCCUPATION OF PREMISE
A. The Developer further agrees that they will not cause to be occupied, any premises
constructed upon the plat or any property within the plat until the completion of the
gas, electric, telephone, and street improvements to the extent of the concrete curb,
gutter and bituminous base required by this Development Contract have been
installed, unless the City has agreed in writing to waive this requirement as to a
specific premises. Furthermore, the City shall have the right to limit the issuance of
building permits for lots within the subdivision if such home construction should
interfere with construction of the City's improvements.
OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS
A. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract and
acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall
become City property without further notice or action.
REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE
A. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in
defense of enforcement of this contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs
and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees if the City prevails in such action.
VALIDITY
A. If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this
contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development
Contract.
XII. GENERAL
A. Binding Effect
1. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and insure to the
benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the
Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land.
B. Notices
1. Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or
demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the
other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by
United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1 by
certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be
•
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the
mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as
set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above.
C. Final Plat Approval
1. The city agrees to give final approval to the plat of the Subdivision upon
execution and delivery of this agreement and of all required petitions, bond
and security.
XIII. VIOLATIONSBUILDING PERMITS
A. In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements contained
in this Development Contract and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its
option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set out hereunder may refuse to
issue building permits to any property within the plat until such time as such default
has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City.
XIV. PARK DEDICATION
A. A park dedication fee of $6,660.00 for Marshan Estates which creates four new lots
without any land dedication.
XVI. PROPERTY TAXES
A. Should the recording of the Final Plat occur after July 1, any and all property taxes
on any public property dedicated as a part of this plat shall be the responsibility of
the developer. Dollars shall be incorporated into the escrow agreement to cover
the cost of said property taxes.
Development Contract
Marshan Estates 7 -26 -04
DEVELOPER
By
Developer
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
CITY OF LINO LAKES
By
Mayor
ATTEST:
By
Clerk
On this day of , 2004, before me, a Notary Public within and for said
County, personally appeared
(Mayor) and (Clerk), to me known to be respectively the Mayor
and Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge
that they executed the same on behalf of said City.
Notary public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
On this day of , of 2004, before me, a Notary Public within and for
said County, personally appeared (Developer), to me known to be
the , of Clyde Rehbein, a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota,
and that they executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they/he executed the same
on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public
•
ATTACHMENT A (CITY INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS)
SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS
DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NAME: Marshan Estates NUMBER OF REU's: 6
APPLICANT: Clyde Rehbein ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 2.85
ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS
7 -26 -04
BUDGET DEVELOPER
IMP. CITY ESCROW
1 SITE GRADING (X) IMP• (Y) AMOUNT (Z) Amount e $0
2 EROSION CONTROL NA $0
3 SITE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Bid Amount e $0
4 LANDSCAPING $0 e
5 STREET /UTILITY CONST.
6 STORM SEWER CONST. $69,000
A. Surface Water Mgmt. Charge (s.f.) $0.093 a
SANITARY SEWER CONST. $11,546
A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) $2,340 a $6,669
B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) $1,015 a
WATERMAIN CONST. $6,090
A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) $2,495 a $7 111
B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) $1,640 a
$9,840
TOTALS:
$110,255
See Attachment B for security amounts to be posted
NOTE:
a: Cost by City policy
b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City
c: Previously Assessed
d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board
e: Provided by Developer
f: Estimate by Feasibility Study
ATTACHMENT B (CITY INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS) 7 -26 -04
CITY FEES
• DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NAME: Marshan Estates NUMBER OF REU's: 6
APPLICANT: Clyde Rehbein ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 2.85
BUDGET DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW
ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS COST NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z)
1 PLANNING /REVIEW
A. Plat Review Fee $100 b $100
B. Planner Review Fee $250 b $250
2 ENGINEERING
A. Plan/Plat/Grading Review b $250
B. Preparation of Plans & Specs. b $0
C. Construction Engineering b $0
D. Construction Staking b $0
E. City Engineering b $200
3 ADMINISTRATION
A. Administration Fee - 3% of Const. xxx a $0
B. Legal $250 b $250
C. Publications $100 b $100
0 DEVELOPMENT FEES
A. Park Dedication $1,665 d $6,660
B. Sealcoating Fee $2,800 a $2,800
C. Aerial Photo Fee 90 /unit a $360
5 BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING $0.0 b $0
DEVELOPMENT SECURITIES
A. Street, St. Swr., Pond Maint.
B. Other - Property Tax, FEMA
TOTALS: Q� 0 $10,970
SECURITY AMOUNTS TO BE POSTED Att. A Att. B Total
X = DEV. IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 1.5 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $0 $0 $0
Y = CITY IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 0.35 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $38,500 $0 $38,500
Z = CITY FEE COSTS X 1.0 (CASH ESCROW) $0 $10,970 $10,970
NOTE:
a: Cost by City policy
b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City
c: Previously Assessed
d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board
e: Provided by Developer
f: Estimate by Feasibility Study
•
AGENDA ITEM 6J
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -109, Awarding Construction Contract, Marshan Lane
Utility Improvements Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required
BACKGROUND:
Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on July 7, 2004. The
results of the bid opening are presented below. The City accepted the bids on July 12,
2004. The City has prepared a Development Agreement and assessments for the
Marshan Estates Subdivision. City Council action is required to award a construction
contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
Contractor Amount of Bid
Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. $225,922.50
Penn Contracting, Inc. $232,545.00
Northdale Construction Co., Inc. $236,346.50
W.B. Miller, Inc. $248,387.25
Redstone Construction Co., Inc. $271,311.95
Volk Sewer & Water, Inc. $296,075.75
Three Rivers Construction $321,273.41
Lametti & Sons, Inc. $323,406.50
Engineer's Estimate $236,314.50
The low bid is approximately 5% under the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy
of the complete bid tabulation is attached.
The substantial completion date for this project is October 1, 2004, with a final
completion date of October 31, 2004.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -109, Awarding a Construction Contract to Dave
Perkins Contracting, Inc. for the Marshan Lane Utility Improvements Project.
3. Not adopt Resolution No. 04 -109.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 04 -109.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -109
RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — MARSHAN LANE UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the Marshan Lane
Utility Improvements project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and
the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Contractor Amount of Bid
Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. $225,922.50
Penn Contracting, Inc. $232,545.00
Northdale Construction Co., Inc. $236,346.50
W.B. Miller, Inc. $248,387.25
Redstone Construction Co., Inc. $271,311.95
Volk Sewer & Water, Inc. $296,075.75
Three Rivers Construction $321,273.41
Lametti & Sons, Inc. $323,406.50
Engineer's Estimate $236,314.50
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. is the lowest responsible
111 bidder;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to award the contract, in the name of the City of
Lino Lakes for the construction of the Marshan Lane Utility Improvements project according
to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of July 2004.
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
AGENDA ITEM 6K
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -105, Approving Change Order No. 1 and Payment
Request No. 3, 2003 Surface Water Management
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required
BACKGROUND:
The City Council awarded the 2003 Surface Water Management contract to Arnt
Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $242,320.96.
The Change Order addresses the addition of 6" draintile and removal of 15" RCP for
the Trapper Crossing portion of the 2003 Surface Water Management Project. This
lowers the total project contract to $239,108.96. A complete breakdown is spelled out
in the attached Change Order.
It is staff's recommendations to approve Change Order No. 1, which results in a total
project cost decrease of $3,212.00 and authorize Payment No. 3 in the amount of
$94,593.20.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -105, approving Change Order No.1 and Payment
Request No. 3 for the 2003 Surface Water Management Project.
3. Not adopt Resolution No. 04 -105.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 04 -105.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -105
RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO.1 AND PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 3 -
2003 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the construction of the project has been begun,
AND WHEREAS, 6" draintile was added and 15" RCP was removed for the 2003 Surface
Water Management Project,
AND WHEREAS, a complete breakdown is spelled out in the Change Order;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES, MINNESOTA:
Change Order No.1 resulting in a decrease of $3,212.00 bringing the contract amount to
$239,108.96 and Pay Request No. 3 in the amount of $94,593.20 is approved for the 2003
Surface Water Management Project.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of July 2004.
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
• TKDA
OENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292-4400
(651) 292-0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
Comm. No. 12817 -01 Cert. No. 3 St. Paul, MN, July 6 , 20 04
To City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
This Certifies that Arnt Construction, Inc.
For 2003 Surface Water Management Projects
Owner
, Contractor
Is entitled to Ninety -Four Thousand Five Hundred Ninety -Three Dollars and 20/100 ($ 94,593.20 )
being 3rd estimate or partial payment on contract with you dated September 22 , 2003
a
ve
Arnt Cons ction, Inc.
, 20 0
RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT
-106 -
An Employee Owned Company Promotina Affirmative Action and Eaua! nnnnrtnnlly
CONTRACT
PLUS EXTRAS
PAYMENTS
CREDITS
Contract price plus extras
$ 242,320.96
All previous payments
$ 155,263.78
All previous credits
Extra No.
Change Order No. 1
$ (3,212.00)
0 n
Credit No.
$ -
n
0 O
-
,I 0
,I 0
AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE
$ 94,593.20
Totals
$ 239,108.96
$ 249,856.98
$ -
Credit Balance
$ -
There will remain unpaid on contract after
payment of this Certificate
$ (10,748.02)
$ 239,108.96
I $ 239,108.96
I $ -
-106 -
An Employee Owned Company Promotina Affirmative Action and Eaua! nnnnrtnnlly
411
TKDA
Engineers - Architects - Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS
Estimate No. 3 Period Ending June 28 , 20 04 Page 1 of 1 Comm. No. 12817 -01
Contractor Arnt Construction, Inc. Original Contract Amount $242,320.96
Project 2003 Surface Water Management Projects
Location City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Total Contract Work Completed $ 263,007.35
Total Approved Credits $ 0.00
Total Approved Extra Work Completed $ 0.00
Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed $ 0.00
Total Amount Earned This Estimate $ 263,007.35
Less Approved Credits $ 0.00
Less 5 % Retained $ 13,150.37
Less Previous Payments $ 155,263.78
Total Deductions
168,414.15
Amount Due This Estimate $ 94,593.20
Contractor
Engineer
Date �� u� , ?C)0Y
Date July 6, 2004
ESTIMATE NO. 3
03 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12817 -01
PERIOD ENDING: June 28, 2004
ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE
TERRA COURT
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600.00
2 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES AND BRUSH LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
3 DITCH EXCAVATION CY 50.0 24.0 $ 23.20 $ 556.80
4 SOD AND RESTORATION SY 420.0 233.0 $ 4.00 $ 932.00
5 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 50.0 2.0 $ 0.01 $ 0.02
6 EROSION CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 200.00 $ 200.00
7 CLEAN EXISTING 12" STORM SEWER PIPE LF 150.0 - $ 5.40 $
8 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1.06 $ 1.06
SUBTOTAL TERRA COURT $ 8,489.88
SHENANDOAH AND HAWTHORN
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00
2 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES AND BRUSH LS 1.0 1.0 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
3 DITCH EXCAVATION CY 2,300.0 2,304.0 $ 10.42 $ 24,007.68
4 SEEDING AND RESTORATION AC 2.0 0.5 $ 500.00 $ 250.00
5 SODDING AND RESTORATION SY 500.0 300.0 $ 3.50 $ 1,050.00
6 CLEAN CULVERT PIPE LF 120.0 90.0 $ 10.50 $ 945.00
7 EROSION CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 500.00 $ 500.00
8 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 250.00 $ 250.00
SUBTOTAL SHENANDOAH AND HAWTHORN $ 51,002.68
0 LAKE DRIVE AND 77TH STREET
MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00
2 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE-
COREDRILLED EA 1.0 1.0 $ 1,290.00 $ 1,290.00
3 15" RCP STORM SEWER (CLASS 5) LF 150.0 $ 53.00 $
4 15" RCP L.R. BEND (CLASS 5) (4' LENGTH) EA 1.0 $ 315.00 $
5 15" RCP F.E.S. WITH TRASH GUARD EA 1.0 $ 735.00 $
6 48" DIA. STORM MANHOLE, TYPE 409 EA 1.0 - $ 1,735.00 $
7 RIP RAP (CLASS II) CY 4.0 - $ 120.00 $
8 STORM POND EXCAVATION CY 200.0 492.0 $ 8.68 $ 4,270.56
9 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGN EA 1.0 $ 100.00 $ -
10 REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) SY 120.0 - $ 300 $
11 SAWCUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) LF 90.0 $ 3..00 $
12 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 40.0 $ 20.00 $
13 3" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (LVWE45030B) TON 30.0 - $ 90.00 $
14 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 70.0 123.0 $ 8.00 $ 984.00
15 SODDING AND RESTORATION SY 450.0 1,111.0 $ 4.00 $ 4,444.00
16 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 400.00 $ 400.00
SUBTOTAL LAKE DRIVE AND 77TH STREET $ 12,988.56
OLD BIRCH STREET
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,875.00 $ 1,875.00
2 15" RCP DRIVEWAY PIPE CULVERT (CLASS 5) LF 100.0 64.0 $ 64.00 $ 4,096.00
3 15" RCP .F.E.S. (CLASS 5) EA 4.0 4.0 $ 400.00 $ 1,600.00
4 REMOVE EXISTING CULVERT (ALL SIZES) LF 100.0 106.0 $ 11.00 $ 1,166.00
5 DITCH EXCAVATION CY 450.0 415.0 $ 10.14 $ 4,208.10
6 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES /BRUSH LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
• AGGREGATE BASE (CLASS 5) (DRIVEWAY)
SEEDING AND RESTORATION TON 30.0 14.0 $ 20.00 $ 280.00
AC 0.1 0.2 $ 2,500.00 $ 500.00
9 . EROSION CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 250.00 $ 250.00
10 CLEAN EXISTING CULVERT LF 40.0 - $ 11.00 $
11 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 200.00 $ 200.00
SUBTOTAL OLD BIRCH STREET $ 15,375.10
-108
ESTIMATE NO. 3
firSURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12817 -01
PERIOD ENDING: June 28, 2004
ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE
BALD EAGLE AND WOODCHUCK CIRCLE
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,750.00 $ 1,750.00
2 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES /BRUSH LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
3 REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY CULVERT LF 24.0 24.0 $ 10.00 $ 240.00
4 12" RCP STORM SEWER (CLASS 5) LF 270.0 272.0 $ 47.00 $ 12,784.00
5 12" RCP L.R. BEND (CLASS 5) (4' LENGTH) EA 1.0 1.0 $ 300.00 $ 300.00
6 12" RCP F.E.S. WITH TRASH GUARD (CLASS 5) EA 1.0 2.0 $ 630.00 $ 1,260.00
7 RIP RAP - CLASS II CY 3.0 3.0 $ 120.00 $ 360.00
8 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 10.0 - $ 22.00 $
9 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 30.0 12.0 $ 12.00 $ 144.00
10 SEEDING AND RESTORATION SY 250.0 350.0 $ 4.00 $ 1,400.00
11 EROSION CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
12 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 300.00 $ 300.00
SUBTOTAL BALD EAGLE AND WOODCHUCK CIRCLE $ 19,838.00
PHEASANT RUN
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00
2 REMOVE/SALVAGE/REPLACE FENCE LS 1.0 - $ 500.00 $
3 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES /BRUSH LS 1.0 1.0 $ 600.00 $ 600.00
4 CLEAN EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE LF 130.0 - $ 6.00 $
5 DITCH EXCAVATION CY 40.0 216.0 $ 26.50 $ 5,724.00
410 SODDING AND RESTORATION SY 200.0 315.0 $ 8.00 $ 2,520.00
TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 50.0 15.0 $ 1.00 $ 15.00
EROSION CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
9 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1.00 $ 1.00
SUBTOTAL PHEASANT RUN $ 10,760.00
RICE LAKE SCHOOL
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 3,460.00 $ 3,460.00
2 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES /BRUSH LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
3 DITCH EXCAVATION CY 500.0 852.0 $ 8.68 $ 7,395.36
4 CLEAN EXISTING STORM PIPE . LF 80.0 - $ 12.00 $
5 SEEDING AND RESTORATION AC 0.1 0.3 $ 2,500.00 $ 750.00
6 EROSION CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 300.00 $ 300.00
7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1.00 $ 1.00
SUBTOTAL RICE LAKE SCHOOL $ 13,106.36
2ND AVENUE (AT ULMER DRIVE)
1 •
MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 2,700.00 $ 2,700.00
2 SEDIMENT EXCAVATION CY 50.0 48.0 $ 23.20 $ 1,113.60
3 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES /BRUSH LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
4 SODDING AND RESTORATION SY 400.0 455.0 $ 5.00 $ 2,275.00
5 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 30.0 15.0 $ 12.00 $ 180.00
6 EROSION CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
SUBTOTAL 2ND AVENUE (AT ULMER DRIVE) $ 7,668.60
BALDWIN LAKE ROAD - NORTH OF ASH STREET
ID1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00
CLEAR AND GRUB TREES /BRUSH LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
REMOVE EXISTING 60" CMP CULVERT LF 55.0 55.0 $ 16.00 $ 880.00
4 60" RCP STORM SEWER (CLASS 2) LF 36.0 40.0 $ 420.00 $ 16,800.00
5 60" RCP F.E.S. (CLASS 2) EA 2.0 2.0 $ 2,100.00 $ 4,200.00
6 RIP RAP (CLASS III) CY 26.0 26.0 $ 120.00 $ 3,120.00
7 RIP RAP (CLASS II) CY 12.0 12.0 $ 120.00 $ 1,440.00
8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) - 109 - CY 100.0 96.0 $ 9.00 $ 864.00
9 COMMON EXCAVATION (STREET & CULVERT) CY 300.0 264.0 $ 9.00 $ 2,376.00
ESTIMATE NO. 3
03 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12817 -01
PERIOD ENDING: June 28, 2004
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT
10 AGGREGATE BASE (CLASS 5) (STREET & CULVERT) (CV) CY QUANTITY 300.0 TO 5,44 244.0 $ PRICE
22.00 $ TO DATE 5,368.00
11 3" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (LVWE45030B) TON 20.0 20.0 $ 90.00 $ 1,300.00
12 SEEDING AND RESTORATION
13 EROSION CONTROL SY 100.0 50.0 $ 6.00 $ 300.00
14 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 1.0 $ 200.00 $ 200.00
SUBTOTAL BALDWIN LAKE ROAD - NORTH OF ASH STREET LS 1.0 1'0 $ 300.00 $ 300.00
$ 41,048.00
TRAPPERS CROSSING AREA
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
2 6" HDPE DRAIN PIPE LF 630.0 1,387.0
3 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAIN PIPE $ 25.00 $ 34,675.00
4 DITCH EXCAVATION EA 4'0 4.0 $ 800.00 $ 3,200.00
5 CLEAN EXISTING 15" RCP CY 650.0 768.0 $ 19.00 $ 14,592.00
6 SODDING AND RESTORATION LF 150.0 $ 6.00 $
7 EROSION CONTROL SY 2,000.0 4,050.0 $ 4.80 $ 19,440.00
8 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM LS 1.0 1.0 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
9 SURFACE DRAIN 3.0 3.0 $ 600.00 $ 1,800.00
10 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) E 6.0 16.0 $ 300.00 $ 4,800.00
11 TRAFFIC CONTROL CY A 300.0 216.0 $ 0.01 $ 2.16
SUBTOTAL TRAPPERS CROSSING AREA LS 1'0 1.0 $ 200.00 $ 200.00
$ 80,809.16
di OAK LANE
W MOBILIZATION LS 1.0
DITCH EXCAVATION 1.0 $ 760.00 $ 760.00
CY 180.0 72.0 $ 8.68 $ 624.96
3 SEEDING AND RESTORATION SY 300.0 300.0 $ 2.00 $ 600.00
4 EROSION CONTROL LS 1.0
5 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 0 $ 1.00 $ 1.00
SUBTOTAL OAK LANE LS 1'0 1.0 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
$ 2,035.96
79TH STREET AND NANCY DRIVE (BERM)
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0
2 COMMON BORROW (LV) 1.0 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
CY 30.0 48.0 $ 50.00 $ 2,400.00
3 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)
4 SODDING AND RESTORATION CY 20.0 37.0 $ 16.00 $ 592.00
5 TRAFFIC CONTROL CY 500.0 405.0 $ 0.01 1 $ 4.05
SUBTOTAL 79TH STREET AND NANCY DRIVE (BERM) LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1.00 $ 1.00
$ 3,097.05
TOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 3
$ 266,219.35
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
1 ADD 6" DRAINTILE TO LAKE DRIVE AND 77TH STREET AREA LF 150.0 150.0 $ 25.00 $ 3,750.00
DELETE 15" RCP STORM SEWER (CLASS 5) FROM LAKE DRIVE
2 AND 77TH STREET AREA
3 MULCH LF (150.0) (150.0) $ 53.00 $ (7,950.00)
4 MULCEMAIN (LABOR) LS 1.0 1.0 $ 275.00 $ 275.00
5 BOBCAT LS 1.0 1.0 $ 563.00 $ 563.00
SUBTOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 HR 1'0 1.0 $ 150.00 $ 150.00
$ (3,212.00)
TOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 3
$ 263,007.35
•
CHANGE ORDER
TKDA
Engineers- Architects - Planners
Saint Paul, MN July 6 20 04 Comm.. No. 12817 -01 Change Order No. 1
To Amt Construction Company, Inc.
for 2003 Surface Water Management Projects
for City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated
September 22 , 20 03 . The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and
covenants. This Change Order will (incr ace) (decrease) (not chanb) the contract sum by
Three Thousand Two Hundred Twelve Dollars and 00 /100 ($ 3,212.00 ).
This change order provides for changes in the work of this contract according to the attached itemization.
Description
Qty Unit Unit Price Total
1. Add 6" draintile to Lake Drive and 77th Street area 150 LF $ 25.00 $ 3,750.00
2. Delete 15" RCP storm sewer (Class 5) from Lake Drive and 77th Street area (150) LF $ 53.00 $ (7,950.00)
3. Mulch 1 LS $ 275.00 $ 275.00
4. Forcemain (Labor) 1 LS $ 563.00 $ 563.00
5. Bobcat 1 HR $ 150.00 $ 150.00
NET CHANGE _ $ (3,212.00)
Amount of Original Contract $ 242,320.96
Additions approved to date (Nos. )
Deductions approved to date (Nos. )
Contract amount to date
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) (No- gauge)
Revised Contract Amount
Approved City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA
Owner
242,320.96
(3,212.00)
239,108.96
IIIApproved Amt Cgxistruction Company, Inc.
By
o -actor
White - Owner
Pink - Contractor
Blue - TKDA
•
AGENDA ITEM 6L
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -106, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction
Contract, HoIIy Drive Improvements Project
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required
BACKGROUND:
Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on July 15, 2004. The
results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award
a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
Contractor Amount of Bid
W.B. Miller, Inc. $824,186.70
Arcon Construction $856,275.56
Central Landscaping $926,219.05
Forest Lake Contracting $952,664.70
Three Rivers Construction $968,701.37
Dresel Contracting $972,882.20
Jay Bros., Inc. $993,456.60
Glenn Rehbein Excavating $996,615.50
Engineer's Estimate $911,004.00
The low bid is approximately 11% under the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy
of the complete bid tabulation is attached.
The substantial completion date for this project is November 1, 2004, with a final
completion date of November 15, 2004.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -106, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction
Contract to W.B. Miller, Inc. for the HoIIy Drive Improvements Project.
3. Not adopt Resolution No. 04 -106.
RECOMMENDATION:
1111 Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 04 -106.
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -106
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT —
HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the Holly Drive
Improvements Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the
following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Contractor Amount of Bid
W.B. Miller, Inc. $824,186.70
Arcon Construction $856,275.56
Central Landscaping $926,219.05
Forest Lake Contracting $952,664.70
Three Rivers Construction $968,701.37
Dresel Contracting $972,882.20
Jay Bros., Inc. $993,456.60
Glenn Rehbein Excavating $996,615.50
Engineer's Estimate $911,004.00
AND WHEREAS, it appears that W.B. Miller, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with W.B.
Miller, Inc., in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the Holly Drive
Improvements Project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of July 2004.
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
July 16, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Re: Holly Drive Improvements
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
TKDA Commission No. 12623 -02
Dear Mayor and City Council:
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292-4400
(651) 292-0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
Bids for the referenced project were received on July 15, 2004, with the following results. A complete
Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information.
Contractor
W.B. Miller, Inc.
Arnt Construction Co.
Central Landscaping
Forest Lake Contracting
Three Rivers Construction
Dresel Contracting
Jay Bros., Inc.
Glenn Rehbein Excavating
Engineer's Estimate
Recommendation
Base Bid
$ 824,186.70
$ 856,275.56
$ 926,219.05
$ 952,664.70
$ 968,701.37
$ 972,882.20
$ 993,456.60
$ 996,615.50
$ 911,004.00
We recommend that you award the Contract to the lowest bidder, W.B. Miller, Inc., for their base bid of
$824,186.70.
Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely,
Scott A. Brink, P.E.
Project Manager
SAB:art
Enclosure
An Employee Owned Company Pr - 1 14 native Action and Equal Opportunity
000
000
000
COO
rOCD
64
1-0
64
0
ye
ER
1 $ 7,525.00
0
O
N
CO
ER
$ 4,620.00
$ 624.00
0
O
0
CO
69
$ 386.00
$ 14,408.75
$ 700.00
0
o
N
64
$ 876.00
$ 1,300.00
$ 1,590.00
$ 425.00
$ 275.00
$ 46,250.12
$ 1,056.00
$ 27,440.00
0
0C)
0T
co
ER
$ 10.36
$ 1,000.00
0
co
et'
N
DO)
69.
$ 69,894.00
$ 26,681.40
0
u)
co
COD
COD
69
CO
v
O)
N
69
6 856.25
o
o
000
CO.
CO
64
0 0
o o
T 610
CD co
64 64
6 1,225.00
6 1,750.00
6 2,480.00
00
0
to
N
to
r
Oi
6 4,171.50 1
000
v00
N o
CV co_ )
roN
o
to
i 1,820.001
0
0
O
0
r
1,540.00 1
_,
err 9r
9z
64
69
err
64 6.64
e»
63
yr
O
O
tND
6.
$ 18,000.00
80.00
6 35.00
000
0
etL()tD
rrr
0 0
6 2.00
6 0.50
6 1.25
6 350.00
00
O O
CO (O
6 10.00
15.00
85.00
i 25.00
6.86
0
O
co
ER
CD
CC
to
69
CDr
CD
co
'-'
ER
0
O O
6. 69
CD
CO
0
r
ER
000
CD CD 0
co 7 VO co )
6461 ER
CO
N
o
,-
64
O
N
ER_,
1 $ 50.00
6 770.00
6 875.00
6 1,225.00
6 1,750.00
O
0
N
CD
ER
6 775.00 1
010
(D
NN
n
6 27.80
32.00
00
0
52.00
i 300.00
i 1,540.00
TABULA OF BIDS
HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 210 - 109 -02
TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12623 -02 E
BIDS OPENED: JULY 15, 2004, AT 10:00 AM
*DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE W.B. MILLER, INC.
ITEM MN /DOT UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
NO. SPEC. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
_.
_,
_,636.E9_,or
9r
9r
69. 649r
6. err
97 00
_,
err
6964
err m
69.
69 err
err
$ 2,310.00
00
00
T0
64
ER
22,575.00
0010
00)CD0r
ER
r.
64 64
654.50
4,053.00
108,930.15
210.00
176.40
1,065.80
552.50
1,325.00
475.00
858.00
52,924.70
000
0
1N0
—NOV
p0p
0
10,878.00
550.00
$ 948.50
$ 71,041.25
$ 25,803.00
$ 69,276.25
$ 3,346.50I
6 1,027.50
6 2,040.50
6 9,400.00
6 4,920.00
6 1,560.00 C
00
p0 0
0(0 CO
0.0
Nr
64
6 630.00
6 12,528.00
i 2,713.50
i 9,550.40
i 13,335.00
0
0
O
r
i 1,148.00
440.00
1,050.00
__
_,
_,
,.r
97
64 9:
6,
ter e+r
err err
69
ER
69
err err
_,
err
69
err 9r v-r err en
64
m err 69
O
r0
1 $ 16,000.00
1 $ 160.00
rs 105.00
3.70
4.75
4.75
4.25
5.25
9.45
105.00
4.20
3.65
4.25
12.50
95.00
78.00
7.85
6000
NCOO
rO
CD
r
10.50
110.00
0
r
0
63
$ 40.25
$ 47.00
39.25
0
IA
r
69
6 1.50
6 26.50
6 1,175.00
6
6 1,560.00
00
00
0N-
o,.
Ni
6.63
6 . 630.00
13.50
16.75
18.80
21.00
i 23.50 1
i 32.80
i 110.00
1,050.00
_.
_, _.
,.,
.., ..r
97
97 97
97
9-r err
err m
d}
69
64
err err
di- 69.
ER 64
0
O
00000
'cYOTT
69
0
0 O
et
ER
0
O
64
0
O
69
6 2,838.00
6 3,696.00
6 468.00
6 616.00
6 1,544.00
6 23,054.00
800.00
6 168.00
876.00
0
pO
O
N
in
i 3,180.00
i 750.00
i 330.00
i 47,194.00
0
O
0)000
r-
64
0
O
0
(xi
NL0
69.
0
O
0
NOr
69-
0 0
O O
O
M 1))
64 6.
0
O
N
CO
co
r
ER
TN $ 36.00 $ 63,540.00
TN $ 39.00 $ 21,411.00
TN $ 35.00 $ 61,775.00
SY I $ 15.00 I $ 4,365.00
$ 1,370.00
$ 693.00
$ 6,400.00
$ 3,600.00
0
O
000
r+-'
69
0 0
O O
co. 0
69
$ 450.00
$ 23,200.00
$ 4,374.00
$ 12,700.00
$ 17,145.00
i 1,740.00 1
$ 1,120.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 900.00
_,
_, _,
..r
err 9r
9r
64 w
64
ER err
err err
$ 2.00
6 9.00
6 800.00
6 900.00
6 1,000.00
69
0 0
0 0
0 O
OCOVN
e-
69 ER
6 450.00
6 25.00
6 27.00
6 25.00
6 27.00
0
0
CA
N
i 32.00
i 250.00
i 900.00
0
0
N
64
0
0
0
0
Tr
63
0
0
N.
6.64
0
0
CCDDr
0
0
ER
12.00
12.00
6 . 4.00
6 2.00
2.00
6 400.00
6 4.00
6 3.00
6 40.00
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0)60100)1
r
6.00
00'L
0
0
M
r
69
$ 10.00
$ 300.00
0
0
N
''
ER
_, _,
9s
9z
9:
69 64 w
ER 6.69 63
err
err
¢Z QQ
601- -.W W
Q
W
69
‹C ‹C ‹C LL U. LL LL
W W W - J
64
U.
63
LL QQ
W W
QCO
W
JN-
CC
CC
I. -
LL
J
LL LLLL
- J
LL ›-
C/)(/
QLL
WJJJ...JWI
LLLLLLQQI-)-
W O000C)S
› -›-›-CC
Z
F-
7"
7"
1 215
1 258
308
39
e7
T
772
11,527
NN
42
292
130
106
5
11
6,742
132
00
Op'
00
0
V
1,036
5
9,485
1,765
549
1,765
N
N CO a
0�
r
r err CO N CO
0Tt00
c0)
0
60
1ORr
CO
HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
(REMOVE & RESET EXISTING PROPERTY IRONS
(MOBILIZATION
1CLEARING
GRUBBING
(REMOVE PIPE CULVERT (CMP,CPP)
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT (RCP)
REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)
(REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACING (STREET & DRIVEWAY)
REMOVE CATCH BASIN
SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
SALVAGE & REINSTALL WIRE FENCE
SALVAGE & REINSTALL WOOD FENCE
SALVAGE & RELOCATE MAIL BOX WITH SUPPORT
SALVAGE SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY)
COMMON EXCAVATION (P)
POND EXCAVATION (P)
ISUBGRADE EXCAVATION
SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)
TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)
EXPLORATORY DIGGING
(AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 FOR STREET, TRAIL, &
(DRIVEWAY (100% CRUSHED)
TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR STREET (C)
TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR TRAIL (C)
TYPE LV 3 NON - WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR STREET (C)
TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (C)
(2" THICK)
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
1.5" CRUSHED ROCK (TRENCH STABILIZATION)
15" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
18" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
21" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
27" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
10" PVC CLEANOUT INCL. CASTING ASSEMBLY
12" PVC CLEANOUT INCL. CASTING ASSEMBLY
10" PVC PIPE SEWER, SDR26
12" PVC PIPE SEWER, SDR26
15" RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASS V
18" RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASS V
21" RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASS III
27" RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASSIII
ADJUST VALVE BOX
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN
CD
r
N
2021.501
2101.502
2101.507
ul
C
O
N
2104.501
2104.501
to
of
O
N
2104.503
2104.505
2104.509
2104.511
2104.513
2104.521
2104.521
2104.523
2104.523
2105.501
2105.501
2105.507
"'
t()
N
2105.525
2123.61
O
r
N
2350.501
2350.501
2350.502
2350.503
2357.502
2451.609
2501.515
2501.515
2501.515
2501.515
2502.602
2502.602
2503.511
2503.511
2503.541
2503.541
2503.541
2503.541
2504.602
2504.602
NCO�lO
COhIA0r
0
TN
Cc) .7. 1i5 7CA0
rr rNNNN
Ncq
er
N
tD CD f,
N NN
0
CAO NCc)
N C9 OD OD CO
it to CD N CO 0)
m CO CC CO CO Cr) et
Q
NMI
V' if
TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12623 -02 ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS •PLANNERS
BIDS OPENED: JULY 15, 2004, AT 10:00 AM
"DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE W.B. MILLER, INC. ARNT CONSTRUCTION CO.
ITEM MN /DOT UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
NO. SPEC. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
$ 2,060.00
$ 1,960.00
O
o
N
63
O
o
N+r-
63
O
CD
63
($ 15,404.80
$ 800.00
0 0
6o
N co
0)I�OM
rNTO
69 64
0
p0
64
0
O
N
4.4
O
O
0
W
O
64
0
060000
0
CDNNOO[D
MMT
49
0
0)
6349
0
0
5co 0
0 0
Mr
43 49
0
0
69
6 5,076.00
0
LO
L00
LDP-
64
N
Cr)
64
0
OCD00
0
N
49.
0
t-00
C)tf)M
N
64
0
$ 3,800.00
1,880.00
306.00
550.00
2,172.60
1,326.00
0
NC00000N
M
OMMM�ti]IOr
tt
64
0
CD
a)a)co
64
0
O
64
0
(0
63
0
CD
6349
0
(0
0
49
0
N
co
63
0
CO
(0
r
63
45
$ 856,275.56 r
_,
49
63 or
64 w
yr
m
$ 2,060.00
$ 1,960.00
O
00
N0
h
6443
$ 5,200.00
$ 58.00
I$ 46.40
$ 32.00
0 0
00
MM
n
N
6343
$ 1,700.00
$ 1,040.00
1 $ 1,800.00
0
O
0
00
r
69.
1 $ 3,290.00
0
0000
0000
CD
TF
64494864
0 0
C II)
0)
0
CD
r
$ 94.00
0
COO)
con:
646349446448
0
0
000000
CV
0
N
0
00
r
0 0
00
03
C)
4963
$ 18.00 1
$ 50.00
0
M01000
LOOS
r
496449
0
- 'CV
r
0
CO
E969
$ 312.00
$ 312.00
$ 1.50
$ 20.00
0
00)
69
O
CO
69
$ 2.00
O
O
0
00
r
63
$ 1,260.00
$ 2,100.00
$ 500.00
$ 3,650.00
104.00
$ 13,944.00
$ 387.50
$ 835.90
$ 2,000.00
$ 13,750.00
$ 9,600.00
0
0
o
LO
(A
43
0
000
6LO6
0N-0
CO
N
64
0
0)
r
64
$ 6,400.00
$ 25,000.00
$ 1,650.00
$ 650.00
$ 4,590.00
0
)c000
co
ON
- :
st
63
0
Tr
LO
43
0
0
0
- :
co
43
$ 3,072.00
$ 475.00
0 0
0000
ON
0 C
LO
N N
49 493
0 0
60
0
LO
r
43 64
$ 2,165.50
$ 1,365.00
$ 4,032.00
0
00000
odd0000
(0
co
64
0 0
Ln to
co co
49 63
$ 9,810.00
$ 3,080.00
$ 472.50
$ 27.001.50
0
v.
0
O
64
'
63
0
n
CO
co
N
co
63
$ 1,260.00
$ 2,100.00
1 $ 500.00
00
00
in u)
CO
M
4R 4A
$ 42.00
$ 15.50
$ 1.30
O 00
0� 0
OC)N
N r r
63 63 63
I$ 1,525.00
$ 1,400.00
$ 1,575.00
$ 3,200.00
5,000.00
275.00
6 650.00
G 85.00
6 3.10
6 7.85
0
0000
t`
Mr
63
00
N 100
0)
9 2,500.001
23.00
00
00
60
MO
15.25
0.35
14.00
285.00
285.00
285.00
LO 0 LO LO
NONC)
N 0 LC) N
r
64 44 493 d3
0
O
r
49
$ 3,000.001
_ -
_ _
_ _ _.
_.
493 64
C9 yr
64 4R
w 4R 64
69 4» 64
$ 1,600.00
$ 2,000.00
L$ 800.00
00'Z9 $
00.000'17 $
$ 16,600.00
$ 600.00
$ 2,572.00
0 0 0
O O O
006
000
'-CO N
64 49 63
0
0
0
0
O)
64
0
0000000
0000600
000000
00qt.
N
49
0
N
69
0 0 0 0 0
ID
00)(00
co 0 ,-7 ,-
49 63 69 64 64
$ 15,430.00
$ 65,952.00
O
O
O
O
V
co
64
$ 3,840.00
$ 625.00
0
0 0
00
0 LO
O M
CD 01
63 64
$ 510.00
$ 880.00
$ 2,840.00
$ 780.00
$ 2,016.00
0 0 0
0 0 0
0000)0N.N-
II LC) Lf)0
49 64 493
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
tl0 NTr.
01 v.
64 49 49. 64
0
O
CO
CD
-
63
49
$ 911,004.00
$ 1,600.00
$ 2,000.00
O
O
00
63
1 $ 4,000.00
$ 26.00
$ 50.00
$ 24.00
$ 4.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 1,300.00
$ 2,500.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 1,400.00
0
O
t0D
N
69
1,700.00
6,000.00
G 300.00
6 1,500.00
6 75.00
0 0
0 0)
49
34.00
0 0
LO N
rT
i 6,000.00
i 25.00
00'08 f
00'0£ . !
i 20.00
0.20
7.00
350.00 1
$ 350.00 1
$ 350.00
0 0 0 0
O O O O
M 00 o 6
r-.
49 49 63 49
0
O
N
49
0
O
Op
N
r
63
- _
-- _ _ _.
64
64 49
63 try-
ter 64
tor 49 69
433
W W
W
WJJ()mW
W W
W
W
W
W W W WU(QJ�(AWJ(pU)W
JJ(jl�'i�JWJ(q
y-
UJ
V
Q
r -r
rN
332
25
643
r 000
r
CD
01
1.•
0
Co Lc)
1,543
7,328
O
256
5
0)
N. r-
rr
142
3,900 Itj
288
0000000
CO M CO
CD 00)0)
cl co v_
N
13)
o
co
C)
HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
RELOCATE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
16" GATE VALVE & BOX
16" GATE VALVE & BOX
6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON, CL. 52
16" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON, CL.52
4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION
DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 OVER EXIST. 15 "RCP
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402
CONSTRUCT SLOTTED VANE DRAIN
CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE, TYPE
406
CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 409
'CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE OUTFALL
CONSTRUCT 72" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 409
CONSTRUCT 96" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE ST
ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (CB OR MH)
RECONSTRUCT EXISTING MANHOLE
RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III
4" CONCRETE WALK
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B418
16" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
TRUNCATED DOME
MAIL BOX SUPPORT
TRAFFIC CONTROL
SIGN PANELS TYPE C (F &I)
SIGN PANELS TYPE D (F &I)
INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY)
PVMT MARK. 24" STOP LINE WHITE, POLY PREFORMED
PVMT MARK. 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW, PAINT
ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE, POLY PREFORMED
DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B &B) (HACKBERRY)
DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B &B) (RED OAK)
DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B &B) (SUGAR MAPLE)
SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED
STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION
HAY BALE DITCH CHECK
SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CATEGORY 1 (WOOD FIBER
BLANKET)
SEEDING (INCL. SEED MIX 50B OR 60B, FERTILIZER, MULCH &
DISC ANCHORING)
TOTAL BID AMOUNT
2504.602
2504.602
2504.602
2504.602
2504.603
2504.603
2504.604
2504.608
2506.502
2506.502
2506.502
2506.502
2506.502
' 2506.502
2506.502
2506.502
2506.522
2506.602
2511.501
2521,501
2531.501
2531.507
2531.618
2540.602.
2563.601
2564.531
2564.531
2564.536
2564.603
2564.603
2564.618
2571.502
2571.502
2571.502
2573.502
2573.602
2573.602
2575.505
2575.604
2575.605
ovc�v°iL°ntoLNnLMnCCOLLOO
CD O
LC-
116-
0CCDDCCDCC000CDDCDDL 00EO1D°ts.r-N.r-1•••
..N.
x-(0000
m
oo
Jz
Z
cr w�OO
>UF-2
EC
W
w
LL Z
F-01U
=
Q
a
Y Z
it-
Q
w Q
Z
0
LL
J -
QZ
O
0
1- W
Q
Z
0
a.
E
0
O m
ga 0
Q J
QU
CO 0 a
❑ FQ- N F- V
m ▪ I-Ca 9 N Q¢
w O CI
0 LL. gZ N ND
O �f d Tm
O 1q z J cc
a.YNO n
4w Q
Q >ZO� ❑ww
"� ¢Oo2 Zy
ww
N
>-0< 00
a 0
Q J 0 W
I."' 2 UCO11-- m9
0 w
za
W z
0
0
N
69
00
t-
o?
69
00
0
O
r
69
00,
O
N-
o
Ef9
00
00)
a)
69-
00
0
O
M
69
00
a0)
0)
00
O
00,
1•rr
69
00,
N
69
0
0
0
1D
E9
0
1D
O
d9
8
1D
1`
O
69
00,
c0)
r
S9
0
a)
69
00
O
In
LL)
69
00
N
E9
co
a)
10
v9
00
N
d)
69
0
O
o
1f)
m
E9
8
O
'4Y
N
co
oo
69
O
N
O
N
Q0)
ID
n
E9
N
O
0
69
a0)
a)
N
69
an
co
0
10
CV
CD
CO
0
CD
0
ui
co
co
co
NI
co
0
CD
CO
Lri
co
cv
CV
ui
co
co
cv
co
O
0
0
69
00
1r)
M
69
00
o
69
°o
0
E9
0
69
O
0
0
69
00
0
00
1f)
69
00
N
69
00
69
00
0
M
H9
0
d'
0
O
0)
69
0
0
69
0
CD
8
0
69
N00
E»
W
69
O
0
0
4,
r
O
69
o
co
r
EA-
LC)
N
69
0
1ND
1D
69
r`
r
E9
0
co
a)
'9
0
4j
7
co
oo
co
CO
0)
in
ER
8
co
O
O
0
O
O
69
0
0
0
0
arc
EH
0
0
0
0
0
O
vi
0
0
0
n
O
69
O
O
1D
CO
0)
E9
O
0
0))
0
69
0
0
0
a
6.
O
0
ID
E9
0
0
•
141.
f9
0
O
1C)
P')
E9
0
O
0
0
v9
8
N
69
0
10D
69
00
O
n
69
00
co
co
69
OO
O
69
00
N
N
69
00
O
m
O
1D
E9
0
0
1D
N
69
O
0
O
0
0
Ef9
0
69
00
co
o
69
00
O
n
69
0
N
69
00
0
6
O
f9
00
0
C
N
co
co
8
co
0
8
0
CD
co
CR
0
cv
co
00
0
O
O
69
0
00
O
O
0
0
ER-
0
0
1D
69
0
0
69
00
e9
0
0
CV
E9
0
O
r
69
0
N
69
00
Ci
E9
0
0
0
1D
69
0
O
1D
69
00
69
O
O
co
69
00
ID
E9
Cr) 8
69
00
O
N
6s
0
0
r
69
00
N
69
0
O
0
69
O
0
0
69
0
0
69
0
0
N
E9
0
LC)
69
00
O
ER
co
oo
co
0
0
cv
cv
O
O
0
0)
O
69
0
O
0
N
O
O
O
O
N
0
O
1I)
co
1D
N
69
o
co
O
O)
(19
0
0
0
0)
1+)
69
O
0
N
64
0
O
•
St}
O
0
o-
64
0
Cr)
1D
69
0
O
O
N.
69
0
0
CN
N
&9
0
0
10D
69
O
O
O
E9
0
O
0
S9
0
0
N
1D
69
0
0
O
N
69
O
W
a)
<f)
co
'9
O
0
0N)
n
69
0
0
0
N
69
0
0
0
O
10
104)
69
O
0
N
1`)
a)
4,
O
0
N
N
69
0
CV
0
a)
69
La
N
a0)
M
1`
cv
co
0
cv
co
co
cu
co
0
0.
ER
0
O
00
0)
f9
O
O
0
0
a)
N
6i
0
O
N
64
0
O
1D
N
69
0
N
1'')
69
0
O
69
O
69.
O
O
O
69
O
O
CV
69
O
v,
69
O
0
«)
10
C9
S9
O
O
ID
69
O
0
a
(i9
0
O
69
O
0
0"
V9
0
O
69
O
0
0
N
69
O
rn
1D
69
O
0
tci
Sig
0
v
11)
69
O
r`
r
69
O
0
a)
O
0
N
to
69
0
Lel
CV
S9
LL)
69
Lo
co
to
0
cv
CO
0
CD
Lo
J
cc
F-
cc
J
LL
-J
J
J
LL
U
co
w
J
J
J
J
W
>-
U
0
0
0
}
0
S
z
F-
co
U.
U.
N
00
N
1f)
N
o
N
0
a)
rn
M
V
CV
0))
N
O
m
O
0
11)
1D
0
0
O
V'
0
o
co
-4
O
0
LO
1D
m
a)
O
CD
CO
CO
CO
cv
CO
0
co
ca
Lo
1-
w
W
O
a
W
CC
0
J
0
s
0
J
m
0
2
Z
Q
Q
J
U
Z
Bo-
o
m
a
0
a
0
cc
U
W
a
W
0
w
W
❑
0
cc
ww
U
W
a
a
W
0
w
w
cC
0
w
a
CC
W
w
co
W
0
w
w
CC
0
CD
U
Fw-
w
U
Z
0
U
w
0
w
w
CC
Z
Q
0
0
w
>
0
w
2
a
w
❑
J
LL
F-
Z
w
w
W
a
CCw
w
U
Z
0
U
F-
CO
a
w
0
J
z
w
w
0
z
H
m
F-
W
6
O
U
z
6
❑
O
z
0
Q
W
w
❑
cc
m
CO
U
0
cc
0
m
g
1
cc
0
U
W
-J
w
m
0
Q
0
m
0
a.
a
0
0
z
O
0
0
cc
0
Q
0
a
of
J
F=
W
W
CC
m
O
U)6
w
01
U=
LLI O
mg
m0
p
Fw-
Q¢
CS
>
0 CC
Q ❑
0
cc
0
0
CC
0.
0
UJ
CC
CC
0
CC
LLI
CC
0
0
LU
co
CC
0
0
0
0
CC
LLI
CC
fa
co
0
a.
0
cc
cc
0
0
a.
CC
CO
CC
0
CC
a.
CO
0
a.
CO
0
CD
CC
co
co
LU
LU
0
3
0
0
CD
0
0
co
Lu
0
0
0
cc
CD
0
0
Lu
0
0
CD
UJ
0
0
0
N
0
N
0
1n
0
N
11))
0
N
0
0
N
O
O
0
N
1°q
0
In
1)
O
11)
N
0
1D
O
N
0
N
@)
<a
N
O
N
N
Cr)
LO
0
O
N
N
0 O
0
0
N
LL0)
0
N
O
1a
0
N
N
1
1n
O
N
N
0
N
N
N
N
N
O
1[)
0
cv
LO
CV
Lo
cv
LO
La
In
CLI
cv
cv
cv
LO
CV
LO
CV
CV
0
cv
*- N a)•41- 11)
CO
r'-wo)0 ter
$ 920.00
o
0
co
nr
O)
r
6.
$ 576.00
o
0
00
et
O
et
69
0
0
O
co
N
69
0
0
N
o
LL)
CO
64
$ 450.00
0
o
ui
N
M
69.
1 $ 1,588.00
0
0
O
co
N
T
6.49
0
0
O
o
N
N...
0
0
of
N
(N
O
E9
0
0
co
0
7
C9
6.64
0
0
O
0
eF
N
6 6,528.00
6 33,190.00
6 • 1,392.00
0
o
co
C9
0
N
69
6 2,592.00
6,172.00
0
c0
0)
CO
0
0
c0
64
6 4,260.00
1,548.80
0
t)
r`
U)
C)
6.
6 2,420.001
0
0.
CD
N
(O
N
6t
551.65
0
(o
o
r
•-
0
w
CO
N
C)
N
0
9
0
(D
(D
r
4,242.24
13,200.00
0
o
0
O
N
CO
0
0
O
0
N
r
7,848.00
0
o
0
0)
C)
LC)
1,188.00 1
0
LL)
co
0)
(0
CO
6,
0
m
CJ
(*)
C)
(0
64
6.
01
O
r`
(0
0)
64
_.
_, ..,
,.,
.. or
lay
la,
64
6.64
en
far
69
6)
6.
64
EA
o0
00
Oet
64
r
6.
$ 576.00
1 $- 4,048.00
O
O
et
t.
69
1 $ 56.00 1
$ -18.00
$ 5.00
1 $ 1,588.00
$ 1,428.00
0
o
O
C1
Eq
0
0
0
r
69
$ 1,704.00
00
00
0
N
69
CO
69
$ 6,638.00
$ 232.00
0000
00o
CO
N
40
69. 64
N
CG
6.
$ 42.60
$ 6.05
00
in.
h�
69
o
N
69
$ 24.751
(0
et
co
69
$ 104.50
$ 16.40
0
'ctn
Oet
64
0)
+-
6.
$ 440.00 1
00000
o9mLL7Nr
OOr
Cret
6.
69
E9
Or
0)
Eft
69
(D
64
0
et
r
Eft
$ 2,420.001
TABULA/(4 OF BIDS
HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 210- 109 -02
TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12623 -02
BIDS OPENED: JULY 15, 2004, AT 10:00 AM
'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION FOREST LAKE
CENTRAL LANDSCAPING CONTRACTING
ITEM MN /DOT UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
NO. SPEC. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
•
00'008'£ $
O
O
000
000
LL)
0)
as
O
O
W
H3
O
O
n
N
64
1 $ 240.00
O
O
O
O
(o
(C
r
E9
$ 750.00
O
O
o
CO
N
r
69
1 $ 1,800.00
O
0
o
00
O
M0
r
64
O
O
et
r
63
O
O
O
0
0
O
r
69
O
o
Oopo
000
(D
0)
69
0
0
0
N
69
O
0
et
(O
63
F$ 40,000.00
$ 2,400.00
O
O
O
O
O
r
69
$ 4,320.00
$ 4,629.00
0
0
O
(0
0
,F
6.
0 0
0 0
c0
0 too
et CD
0) CO
63 69.
0
0
o0No
r`
6.64
0
0
O
N
NN
0
0
CO
r
69
0
0
to
6.
$ 1,045.00
0
O
0
CO
r
N
69.
$ 1,287.00
$ - 4,032.00 f
0
O
oo
(n(0
t_
(D
64
0
co.
N
(0
6.69.6.
0
O
N
0
co.
N
h
o
$ 1,120.00 1
$ 360.00 1
O
O
O
OD
0)
('j
CV
6}
$ 4,951.70
69
O
n
t00
(0
N
to
0)
64
0
00
0
(0
CO
64
0
0
0
CO
63
1 $ 800.00
0
000
O
n
N
69
0
o
N
r
64
0
O
O
64
I $ 30.00
0
00
N
69.
0
O
co_ 0
r
EH
1 $ 1,300.00
0
0
co
(
r
69.
0
0
O
co, 0
r
64
$ 1,800.00
0
o
0
O
N
69
1 $ 3,200.00
$ 8,000.00
$ 400.00
0
000t0
0
0
r
E9
0 0
0 C7
W
64 EA
0
r`
64
$ 34.00
$ 26.00
0
00
0
U)
r
6464
0
CD
0
N
6 23.00
0
000
0
CO
69
0
(O
tT
69
0
U)
r
69
0)
01
0
69
0
CD
et
6 225.00 1
0
o
U)
N
i 240.00 1
0
00
N
0
O
et
i 4.00
0
0
N
69.
0
0)
r
69
0
o
O
O
O
u7
64
...
69
ey.
64
at
69
69.
en
M
•
0
O
U)
r
69.
$ 1,760.00
$ 925.00
0
O
v
co
63
$ 77.00
0
O
0
CO
64
0
O
64
0
C)
CD
N
69.
1 $ 1,800.00
1 $ 17,000.00
O
O
O
r
69
$ 11,100.00
0
0
co_ N
co
69
0
0
0))
C)
69
00'005'9 9
6 38,000.00
6 1,170.00
800.00
6 4,968.00
6 4,474.70
0
(0
CO
0
(D
.69.
6 3,600.00
6 7,680.00
6 . 1,475.00
6 5,000.00
0
O
((00
N
595.00
0
O
t0r))_
r
1,278.00
0
00000o
0))_
co
69.
p
v
r
69
0
00
T
64
0
coo_
T
di
0
O
or
64
0
(
OO
64
$ 2,100.00 1
0
O
(^v
$ 24,129.00 1
0
co
,-
et
69
i
69.
$ 926,219.05
_,
_.. _,
_,
_,
... ■77
.,T
cr.,
Eft
err
69
v:
O
O
U0)
_
"
69
1 $ 1,760.00
r$ 925.00
1 $ 3,450.00
O
U)
0)
6.
1 $ 48.50
0
Or
CO
6.
0
�
fiS.
EA 1 $ 1,800.00
EA 1 $ 1,700.00
EA ( $ 1,510.00
EA $ 1,850.00
6 1,810.00
0
O000
N
CO.
C
6t
0
LO
NCDr
C l'1
Efi
0 0
0 0))
64 64
800.00
92.00
2.90
8.20
36.00
30.00
co
000
00)
N
O
O
O
LL)
0
CO
35.00
145.00
O
000
O
0
r
O
tt7
400.00
450.00 I
400.00
0
000*-
N
64
0
r..
64
0
69
-0)
O
69.
O
r
6t
CO
O
o
00
(y
r
69
0 ii
Q
_,
WWWWWWU(A
Q,
..,
.,,
-I
cm
CO U)
63
WJ(nCOWJJCOI-I-�JW
64
6t
yr
6r
E9
64
64
ftJ
fJ)
f3.
WW
W
WJJfj_IWW
rrrrCM
1 332
N
643
x000
r
0
Nr
N00c0r
((j
54
1,543
7,328
00 (0
r N
LL).-
0)
L
T�C'4
r
3,900
288
30
000000
C9
C)
CO)
_
et
O
CO
N
N
O)
C
0)
W
CO
HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
]RELOCATE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
16" GATE VALVE & BOX
116" GATE VALVE & BOX
16" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON, CL. 52
116" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON, CL.52
14" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION
DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 OVER EXIST. 15 "RCP
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402
CONSTRUCT SLOTTED VANE DRAIN
CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE, TYPE
406
CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 409
!CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE OUTFALL
CONSTRUCT 72" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 409
1CONSTRUCT 96" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE ST
ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (CB OR MH)
RECONSTRUCT EXISTING MANHOLE
RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III
4" CONCRETE WALK
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B418 -
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
TRUNCATED DOME
MAIL BOX SUPPORT
(TRAFFIC CONTROL
SIGN PANELS TYPE C (F &I)
SIGN PANELS TYPED (F &I)
INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY)
PVMT MARK. 24" STOP LINE WHITE, POLY PREFORMED
PVMT MARK. 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW, PAINT
ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE, POLY PREFORMED
DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B &II(HACKBERRY)
DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B &B) (RED OAK)
DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B &B) (SUGAR MAPLE)
SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED J
STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION
HAY BALE DITCH CHECK
SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CATEGORY 1 (WOOD FIBER
BLANKET)
SEEDING (INCL. SEED MIX 508 OR 60B, FERTILIZER, MULCH &
DISC ANCHORING)
TOTAL BID AMOUNT
2504.602
2504.602
2504.602
2504.602
2504.603
2504.603
2504.604
2504.608
No
U)
( ^j
N
2506.502
2506.502
2506.502
2506.502_
2506.502
2506.502
2506.502
2506.522
2506.602
2511.501
2521.501
N
N
n m
',I' CO
(9 C9
N N
1 2540.602
1 2563.601
co O
coo
N
2564.531
2564.536
2564.603
2564.603
2564.618
2571.502
2571.502 f
2571.502 1
2573.502
2573.602 1
2573.602
2575.505 L
2575.604
2575.605
(o
et
CD(�000)
et
et
et
et0(n(nwu)to
O
NC)et
U)
CD
0
0-
U:_
•••••••^
-N(O
118 _
CO
et
CD CD
LL)CD
CD
n
(D
CO
CD
D)O
CDn(�h(.(.(.(�
0.1
c9
et
u70h
^(.n000OCO
W
W
O
N
C)
CO
et
CO
1
00'OL4'E
68,000.00
000
O
O
Mr
0
W
64
CCDD
O
N
2,772.00
00
Cn
CO
CD
CO
di
1,544.00
°00
00)
N
r ts
0
CD
0)
N
1 ,752.00
390.00
1,484.00
550.00
242.00
75,847.50
1,584.00
00
O
O
NM
O
O
12,432.00
1,500.00
$ 104,335.00
1 $ 42.00 1 $ 74,130.00
$ 53.50 $ 29,371.50
$ 41.50 $ 73,247.50
$ 12.00 $ 3,492.00
0
(O1)
CO
69
0000
r0
69
2,310.00 1
0
10
0
4)
64
3,452.00 1
00
n
0)
N
CO
r
1,840.00 1
520.00
21,808.00
so
T
N
.7
CN•)
1'
T
19,685.00I
2,010.00
1,487.50
• 230.00 1 $ 920.00 1
N
r
,-
E9
0
0
t'D
64
--
--
_,
07
69'
err
Art
tor
w
mw w
ER
69
w 6T
d}
6 748.00 1
°o
CMD
CO
69
6 978.00 11
°o
N
M
E9
6 460.00 13
6 520.00 9
6 23.50 9
6 26.50
0
0)
N
i 31.00 9
3 33.50 $
42.50 1 $
000
0000
o
.(-000
E13
0CD
CO
CO
69-
6}E9
0
0
8.00
0
O
T
d4..,
9.00
4.00 1
2.00
00
100
rO
64
M
69
6 .7.00
6.00
00
00
0)
110.00
22.00
11.25
12.00
00
NtD
CD
O)
12.00
300.00
00'44 $
TABULAWV OF BIDS
HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
S.A.P. 210 - 109 -02
TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12623 -02
BIDS OPENED: JULY 15, 2004, AT 10:00 AM
'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION
DRESEL CONTRACTING JAY BROS., INC.
ITEM MN /DOT UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
NO. SPEC. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
_,
,.)
...
w
w
E9.
69
w
w w w69-
69
w w
E9
000
0
O
N
V
E9
O
COD
O
co
69
O
0
0
CO
EH
L$ 37,625.00
6 1,032.00
6 1,848.00
0
O
trd
CO
69
6 1,078.00
0
O
0)
CC)
69
6 34,581.00
0
O
O
O
O
64
168.00
6 1,022.00
0
O
0
O
tD
N
6 2,332.00
525.00
231.00
43,823.00
990.00
00
O
00
0
0
N
O
0
0
M
t 9,324.00
625.00
0
O.
4)
1`
N
V
r
69
0
co
CD
M
(0
N.
EA
M0
M r
t- 0
M 0
(0 N
CO 0 1,
E9 69
$ 4,123.47
$ 904.20
$ 1,540.00
00
O
V
CD
CO
lfl
64
$ 3,192.00
$ 1,008.00
00
O
00
CD
0)
r
EFT
O
0
,-
N
64
$ 588.00
$ 22,411.20
$ 4,422.60
0
co.
CD
V
T
64
$ 2,268.001
4)0
N.: o
0) CD
CD CD
(0 0)
6. 69
$ 1,785.00
-.
.....
_,
.,.
or
m
69
y:
w
ER w w
69-
64
.n w
1 $ 200.00
0
O
CO O
0
0)
M
E969_,_,
0
0
0
r
L$ 175.00
1 $ 4.00
0
0
CD
69_,
1$ 9.00
0
0
^
69,,
$ 0.75
0
0
CO
ERA
$ 250.00
4.00
3.50
0
O
N
69
6 22.00
0
O
O
21.00
6 6.50
6 7.50
O
n
CD
9.00
0 0
0 0
0 r
6969
0
0
�
69
$ 42.40
$ 56.17
$ 40.34
h
r
.V--•
4:3
N
CO
r
E969
$ 20.00 I
$ 745.50
$ 798.00
$ 1,008.00
$ 1,365.00
$ 525.00
$ 588.00
$ 24.15
$ 27.30
$ 30.45
33.60
$ 37.80 1
$ 47.25
$ 241.50
$ 1,785.00
dr
w
w
69
or w w64
w
0
00
00
0o
00
NN
E969
0
1 $ 15,000.00
0
000
000
u)
Cs-
ONM
6.
0
Cn0
EA
0
VA
6 585.00
0
00
0co
t`o
ho
EA
0
CO
co-
6 28,817.50
6 1,000.00
420.00
0
000
coo
CD
rrr
0
00))
(014)
0
6 575.00
242.00
53,936.00
1,320.00
O
00
00
0
o
CV
6.69ww
o
m
$ 15,540.00
$ 750.00
0
0
0
CA
h
r
64
$ 69,982.25
$ 26,571.60
$ 68,835.00
O
In
1--
m
M
64
$ 1,027.50 1
$ 1,925.00
$ 6,800.00
O O Q O
00000
0000
°mNUO) °m
co — - C
69644/!6-
$ 750.00
$ 27,840.00
$ 5,670.00
O
0
°n
$ 1,860.00 (_
$ 1,330.00
$ 1,400.00
O
0
_,
.,..,T�E969E9w
err err Art
00
00
00
r
6.
o
ri
N
4/4
$ 75.00
$ 50.00
0
0
O
r
69
10.00
15.00
0
0
in
69
4.00
2.50
00
00
00
40)r
4.00
000
000
04)
r
CC)
r
7 - 22.00
8.00
10.00
c
15.00
00
0
4)0
r
69 49
0
0
V
64
TN $ 39.65
TN $ 48.40
TN $ 39.00
0
0.
N
r
E9
?•
CO
0
t
r
69
Q
0e
$ 25.00 f
6 850.00 f
6 950.00
1,250.00
6 1,500.00
6 650.00
- - -- - - -- - --
6 750.00
6 30.00
6 35.00
cno
CV 01
38.00
350.00
0
0
0
In
Eff
W
_,
_,
..,
.,.
63
4/4
Cr7
4/9
64
69
w w E9
EA
w
Z Q
I-W
Q Q¢ Q
W W W W
64
Q LL U-
WJJ
64 E9
LL LL
J -1
E9
LL
-./
LL QQ
JW
Q
W
CO
J1-
Q2
1-J
LL
LC.
JJJ
LLLLLL
CO
COWJ
QLLLL
J
LLLLQ
J
JW
Q )-
WOOOO
› -1-Y[L
C.) 2
Z
I-
Nr
200
215
C1D
N
308
M
154
772
NN
O
42
292
130
CD
0
4)r
N N
*' n
CO
CO
00
0
0
0
,v-
00
V
CO 0
r
9,485
O0) 111
r C
!n
r r
N
4)
O^
CD
n CO
V 4- 4- V
1
928
162
508
635.00
601
4)V.-
M
HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
REMOVE & RESET EXISTING PROPERTY IRONS
[MOBILIZATION
CLEARING
(.5
Z
E
m
n
m
(5
REMOVE PIPE CULVERT (CMP,CPP)
IREMOVE PIPE CULVERT (RCP)
REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)
IREMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
'REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACING (STREET & DRIVEWAY)
(REMOVE CATCH BASIN
SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)
SALVAGE & REINSTALL WIRE FENCE
SALVAGE & REINSTALL WOOD FENCE
SALVAGE & RELOCATE MAIL BOX WITH SUPPORT
SALVAGE SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY)
COMMON EXCAVATION (P)
POND EXCAVATION (P)
SUBGRADE EXCAVATION
SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV)
TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)
EXPLORATORY DIGGING
AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 FOR STREET, TRAIL, &
DRIVEWAY (100% CRUSHED)
TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR STREET (C)
TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR TRAIL (C)
TYPE LV 3 NON - WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR STREET (C)
TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (C)
(2" THICK)
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
1.5" CRUSHED ROCK (TRENCH STABILIZATION)
15" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
18" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
21" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
27" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD
10" PVC CLEANOUT INCL. CASTING ASSEMBLY
12" PVC CLEANOUT INCL. CASTING ASSEMBLY
10" PVC PIPE SEWER, SDR26
12" PVC PIPE SEWER, SDR26
15° RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASS V
18" RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASS V
21' RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASS III
27" RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASSIII
ADJUST VALVE BOX
'3ONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN
0
r
N
2021.501
N
0
O
N
2101.507
2104.501
2104.501
0
G
N
2104.501
2104.503
2104.505
2104.509
2104.511
2104.513
2104.521
2104.521
2104.523
2104.523
2105.501
2105.501
2105.507
2105.522
2105.525
2123.61
2211.501
2350.501
2350.501
2350.502
0
0 LO
0
N
2357.502
2451.609
2501.515
2501.515
2501.515
2501.515
2502.602
2502.602
2503.511
2503.511
2503.541
2503.541
2503.541 1:
2503.541
2504.602
2504.602
rNMV
OCDn
OOOTNMQ_
rrr
119
-,0)O
C� rNN
NM
CV N
0
N
oco�
N N N
0
N
0)0
N CO C1
NMO CD
CO CO M M
0h 0000
C9 M CO M V
rV
NMI{
V d'
SION NO. 12623 -02 ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
JULY 15, 2004, AT 10:00 AM
1011 IN BIDDERS CALCULATION GLENN REHBEIN
DRESEL CONTRACTING JAY BROS., INC. EXCAVATING
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
O o
0000
OOtOo
0 0
N O
N N
6.6.64E9
o
0)
COO
o
N
'
$ 274.00
$ 19- 588 -00
) O
x00000
it00)000
I r
1 ID0
h6.
0
N
r
696.
0
CO
.-sTco.
N
0
LO
0)
6.6-
0
0
0)
co
O
O
O
0
N
r
69
o o o o 0 0
OO O O OOONOOOOOO.op
Oef00000OiNOCV
O CO p O CO O
NMOO C7�NM
ercv CDC r
696969 6969. 69.69
o to
N
0 N.
69
o
to
Q)OI�
0�
64
o
o
69
0
to
O
*-
69
o
Oo
CD
co
6.6.6.6.
o
N
V-
NN
o
oNoo00000et0o
t0
MIDr
o
t0
o
LC)
.-
6.6-6.
0
000o00oC
M
0.10101
o
•r
r
o o
W
CS. l
O
rrr
696.6
o
^n
O
o
co
- 64696.
p
0
rNNC:,
CD
0 0
14 CD �
N r
a
V9619
$ 4,761.25
$
0
to
tCi
0
c0'
m
0)
6.
0 0
00000000000
OOIli
000)NMtoN
N 0
CV N
69 EFT
0
CD
696}
0
to
0
of
0 0
O)coc
r
69. 6.
0
V9
0
69
0
OtOLc)
0)
r
Nrr
64
0
'I'
64
0
69
$ 2,100.00
0 0 0 0
0000000h000
0of00000
r
00)00_N0,r--
NN VCD
6. 6. 69. EFT 69. 69
0 0
ffl 696969
o
OiOCVCV
o
of
0
el-
ER
0
000.100
N
6.6.
0
O
N
•1,
0,
0
Lo
NM0r
696969
0
N
0
to
r
0
tri
di
to
tD000ot700C0
co
6>
0 0
C h
rMO(
6. 6.
0
h
6.
0
n
d}
0
r
69
0 0 0
o of ri
0r
6.6964
0 0
N O
o
r 0
O
dT 6}
�.0
0
CO '
- to
69 E9
0
0
CO
O)
0)
69
•
•
■
■
$ 1,785.00
$ 2,415.00
0
0
CO
VT
0
0
N
o
69
I $ 58.80
$ 23,356.20
0
0
(MD
69-
1 $ 2.456.26
O
0
CO
,-
. 69-
$ 18.900.00
0
0
O
co
69
0
0
0
M
r.
H9
00000-
00000
0LO0(f)0
00) 00)_ 10 N- O
co r CO N CV
69 6.69 63 69
--
6 3,510.00
6 4.860.45
0
00))
N
69
0
N 03
CO
6}
0
CO
6.
0
M
0
CO
CV
2,223.10 1
526.49
0
N
F..
0)
+-
CO
N
a)
O
N
O
O
oD
04
N
2,661.12
• 11,490.00
$ 14.550.00
000
N
. T
69
00)
r
T
69
$ 1,540.00
$ 283.50
$ 26.541.90
69
69.
err
vs
69
69.
6.
6. 69
$ 1,785.00
$ 2,415.00
O
co
6969
O
co
$ 29.40
$ 70.35
1 $ 25.20
$ 3.82
$ 1,890.00
1 $ 1,890.00
1 $ 1,680.00
$ 10,800.00 I $ 1,890.00
$ 1,995.00
6 1,995.00
$ 3,255.00
$ 5,355.00
$ 336.00
$ 1,260.00
$ 65.00
$ 3.15
50'8
$ 52.50
O
0
(0
69.
0
COO
M
O
0
M
0
EFT
0-
O
O
co
co
6
N
696.
_
S 578.00 I I $ 30.97
n
O)
O
69
0
O
COD
N
rNr
M
T
6.
0
OOi
M
0
O
6.
Op
N
0
• 4,291.20 $ 9.24
• 11,550.00 $ 383.00
13,800.00 1 1 $ 485.00 C
O
O)
0
•
.
I.0
CV
O
0
0)
p
69.
$ 14,000.00 $ 55.00
$ 360.00 $ 3.15
$ 25,278.00 $ 2.31
$ 5,713.50 $ 1.40 I
0
o
0
E9
$ 4,400.00
$ 2,500.00
$ 7,000.00 •
$ 20,000.00 •
$ 2,700.00 •
$ 750.00
6 4,590.00 1
6 6,557.751
_ •
0•
(D
1.r)
(0
CD
69
5,888.001
O o
0000
0000
NN
r N
69. 69-
•
o
CO
69.
O
0
d'
64
$ 400.00
$ 18,260.00;
'O
O
to
CND
69
•
-.
1 $ 2,500.00 1
00
00
0
NN
69
U
VT
69
$ 972,882.201
- _-
......
_.
--
69
69
--
69
69
6A
69
69
--
--
0 0
0 0
N 0
'-N
696.
1 $ 850.00
0
O
0
NI-
6.
$ 200.00
$ 55.00
0�
N
69
1$ 4.50
--
0
0
O
N
H9
$ 440.00
$ 1,800.00
0 0 0 0 0 0
0000 .00 (00
N t0 to O of h.
NNMeY
6}696. 69696QQH
$ 85.00
�$ _ _ 4.25 1
0
.p
6.
1 $ _39.00 1
0
M
N^
69.69
0
N
$ 3,000.00
$ 25.00 1
$ 34.00
000
0
O
r
EA
O
6
6.6.
o
O
$ 14.90 1
$ 385.00 1
$ 460.00 1
$ 420.00
t10j
N
69
$ 500.00
$ 4.00
$
.061 O
r O
N
N
6.9 69
WWWJJC
WWW
W
WWWWWL Lf000JCOCOIlJJCnB1JJL
HBBJWJV)
V)
rrr
2
332
N
643
r
10
CO
CD
2
1
2
5.00
6
1
A
NT
In
rn
N0
M
r
256
Mr
0))
-
r
-
r
O
m
of
288
(0(0(0
(00
M
'7
28.00
90
11,490
O
CO
C+i
HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
RELOCATE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
mm
�W
>__J
Q
>Wi
WTI
X
>,
¢i
16" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON, CL. 52
16" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON, CL52
4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION
Cn
C7
z
IT,
z
0'
W
�I
U:
;CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 OVER EXIST. 15 "RCP
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402
Z
Q
CC
0
W
Z
>
0
W
0
v)
I-
O:
CLI
z,
1CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE, TYPE
406
CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 409
CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE OUTFALL
CONSTRUCT 72" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 409
CONSTRUCT 96" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE ST
ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (CB OR MH)
RECONSTRUCT EXISTING MANHOLE
gY
da
cc
a}'
�
OZ'
z0
Ii
�
W'
Q''
U i
4 erg
(CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN 8418
6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
2
°
o
W
F-
¢
0
D,
F- �
MAIL BOX SUPPORT
Q0
Fi
zo
U
U
it
¢ZZI
I�-
otf
LL
U0
-I�
W
z
cn
LL
QW.
W
v)
INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY) l
PVMT MARK. 24" STOP LINE WHITE, POLY PREFORMED
PVMT MARK. 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW, PAINT t
ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE, POLY PREFORMED
D ECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B &B) (HACKBERRY)
D ECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B &B) (RED OAK)
DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B &B) (SUGAR MAPLE)
SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED
STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION
HAY BALE DITCH CHECK
SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT
= ROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CATEGORY 1 (WOOD FIBER
3LANKET) -
SEEDING (INCL. SEED MIX 508 OR 60B, FERTILIZER, MULCH &
DISC ANCHORING)
z
O
<
¢
o
m
¢
O
2504.602
2504.602
CD
4'v
10
CD
10
CD CD
of 444
10 10
CO
to
CD
to
N in
o
to
co
to
LO
cG
to
2506.502
0000N00000
11
co
0000
t0
N
C1
co
to
N
.1
(D
M
N
M
OCO
(0
N
IC)
o
t0
N
cC
co
0rNMM
ID 1.0
N
t1
N
In
t1)
N
C1
O
N
C1
.0
N
,-o0009)C+O)000
CD
M
O
N
CD
06x1
4
b
N
0
Co
to
N
t0
Vc
CD
M
N
to
et:
CD
t0
N
0
4
0
to
N
CD
CO
u)
N
cD
et
CO
Co
N
CO
eF
CD
LD
N
o000oi
.n
N-
LO
N
to
^
LO
N
IC)
N.(
to
N
N
C+)c')a
O
N
- - :
O '
10 I
N i
2513.602
2575.505
- -
0
CD
n
I()
N
2575.605
CO
eF
CO
CO
n
a
O
tt
O) O
0) to
r
co
N
co
M.
co
0
N.
120
_
CND
coo
coo
coo
CD
CnD
COO
co o
O�
n
CO
n
n
n^
n
co
W
OCI 0
0
•
AGENDA ITEM 6M
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 26, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -107, Approving Change Order No. 2 and Payment
Request No. 3, 21St Avenue Street and Storm Sewer Improvements
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required
BACKGROUND:
The 21st Avenue Street and Storm Sewer Improvements contract to Arnt Construction
Company, Inc. is in the amount of $234,195.65.
The Change Order addresses the addition of aggregate base, non - wearing course
bituminous pavement, and 4" draintile. This raises the total project contract to
$247,842.63. A complete breakdown is spelled out in the attached Change Order.
It is staff's recommendations to approve Change Order No. 2, which results in a total
project cost increase of $13,646.98 and authorize Payment No. 3 in the amount of
$28,708.73.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -107, approving Change Order No.2 and Payment
Request No. 3 for the 21st Avenue Street and Storm Sewer Improvements Project.
3. Not adopt Resolution No. 04 -107.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 04-107.
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -107
RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO.2 AND PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 3 — 21ST
AVENUE STREET AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the construction of the project has been begun,
AND WHEREAS, aggregate base, non - wearing course bituminous pavement, and 4" draintile
was added for the 21st Avenue Street and Storm Sewer Improvements Project,
AND WHEREAS, a complete breakdown is spelled out in the Change Order;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES, MINNESOTA:
Change Order No.2 resulting in a increase of $13,646.98 bringing the contract amount to
$247,842.63 and Pay Request No. 3 in the amount of $28,708.73 is approved for the 21St
Avenue Street and Storm Sewer Improvements Project.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 26th day of July 2004.
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
TKDA
• ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292-4400
(651) 292-0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
Comm. No. 12688 -01 Cert. No. 3 St. Paul, MN, June 29 , 20 04
Owner
, Contractor
To City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
This Certifies that Arnt Construction Company
For 21st Avenue Street and Storm Sewer Improvements
Is entitled to Twenty Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Eight Dollars and 73/100
being 3rd estimate f
Rec
p
nt iii" full
ove Ce
($
28,708.73 )
ent on contract with you dated October 27 2003
cate. TKDA
t Construction Company
, 20 V Sco . B ' , P.
RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT
Contract price plus extras
All previous payments
All previous credits
Extra No.
CONTRACT
PLUS EXTRAS
$ 228,821.90
PAYMENTS
CREDITS
$ 202,775.06
Change Order No. 1
Change Order No. 2
$ 5,373.75
$ 13,646.98
Credit No.
It
IV
AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE
Totals
Credit Balance
28,708.73
$ 247,842.63
There will remain unpaid on contract after
payment of this Certificate
231,483.79
16,358.84
$ 247,842.63
- 1 2 3 -
247,842.63
•
•
TKDA
Engineers - Architects - Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS
Estimate No. 3 Period Ending June 29 , 20 04 Page 1 of 1 Cousin. No. 12688 -01
Contractor Arnt Construction Company Original Contract Amount $228,821.90
Project 21st Avenue Street and Storm Sewer Improvements
Location City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Total Contract Work Completed $ 243,667.15
Total Approved Credits $ 0.00
Total Approved Extra Work Completed $ 0.00
Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed $ 0.00
Total Amount Earned This Estimate $ 243,667.15
Less Approved Credits $ 0.00
Less 5 % Retained $ 12,183.36
Less Previous Payments $ 202,775.06
Total Deductions
Amount Due This Estimate
• Contractor
Engineer
214,958.42
28,708.73
Date r. �/ .404
Date June 29, 2004
•
ESTIMATE NO. 3 •
21ST AVENUE STREET AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12688 -01
PERIOD ENDING: June 29, 2004
ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE
DIVISION I - STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION
1 15" RC PIPE SEWER, CLASS 5, DESIGN 3006 LF 92.0 97.0 $ 26.00 $ 2,522.00
2 18" RC PIPE SEWER, CLASS 5, DESIGN 3006 LF 171.0 171.0 $ 28.00 $ 4,788.00
3 24" RC PIPE SEWER, CLASS 3, DESIGN 3006 LF 284.0 284.0 $ 34.00 $ 9,656.00
4 15" RC PIPE APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EA 1.0 1.0 $ 716.00 $ 716.00
5 24" RC PIPE APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EA 1.0 1.0 $ 1,370.00 $ 1,370.00
6 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN - TYPE 402 EA 2.0 2.0 $ 1,150.00 $ 2,300.00
7 CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE - TYPE 406 EA 2.0 2.0 $ 1,648.00 $ 3,296.00
8 CONSTRUCT 60" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE - TYPE 406 EA 1.0 1.0 $ 2,884.00 $ 2,884.00
9 CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER STORM SEWER MANHOLE -
TYPE 409 EA 1.0 1.0 $ 1,648.00 $ 1,648.00
10 RIPRAP CLASS II CY 10.0 - $ 85.00 $
11 RIPRAP CLASS III CY 20.0 10.0 $ 85.00 $ 850.00
12 EXPLORATORY DIGGING HRS 4.0 2.0 $ 256.00 $ 512.00
13 POND /DITCH EXCAVATION CY 1,010.0 1,040.0 $ 4.56 $ 4,742.40
14 CRUSHED ROCK 6" DEPTH (TRENCH STABILIZATION) LF 300.0 $ 5.00 $
15 INSULATION (4" THICK) SY 150.0 150.0 $ 23.00 $ 3,450.00
16 STORM POND NATIVE SEEDING (MN /DOT MIX 25A MODIFIED
[25B]) ACRE 0.3 $ 2,200.00 $
SUBTOTAL - DIVISION I
$ 38,734.40
DIVISION 11 - STREET CONSTRUCTION AND RESTORATION
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 0.75 1,200.00 $ 900.00
3 CLEARING TR 10.0 21.0 $ $ 110.00 $ 2,310.00
4 GRUBBING TR 10.0 16.0 $ 110.00 $ 1,760.00
5 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (ALL TYPES) LF 131.0 141.0 $ 2.00 $ 282.00
6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) SY 3,068.0 3,068.0 $ 1.25 $ 3,835.00
7 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LF 324.0 637.0 $ 3.00 $ 1,911.00
8 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY 6,510.0 6,510.0 $ 3.78 $ 24,607.80
9 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) (P) CY 3,450.0 3,450.0 $ 11.30 $ 38,985.00
10 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 350.0 336.0 $ 0.01 $ 3.36
11 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED) TON 2,800.0 2,800.0 $ 10.34 $ 28,952.00
12 TYPE LV AGG. 3 WEARING COURSE (B) (LVWE35030B) TON 610.0 568.22 $ 38.00 $ 21,592.36
13 TYPE LV AGG. 3 NON - WEARING COURSE (B) (LVNW35030B) TON 605.0 605.00 $ 37.60 $ 22,748.00
14 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 250.0 450.0 $ 1.50 $ 675.00
15 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 1,615.0 1,675.0 $ 11.20 $ 18,760.00
16 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C (INCLUDING POST AND ASSEMBLY) EA 1.0 - $ 180.00 $
17 PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" SOLID LINE - WHITE PAINT LF 810.0 $ 0.40 $
18 TYPE 111 BARRICADE EA 1.0 $ 250.00 $
19 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE BOX EA 5.0 5.0 $ 225.00 $ 1,125.00
20 ADJUST EXISTING FRAME AND RING CASTING EA 2.0. 2.0 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
21 SILT FENCE, TYPE PRE - ASSEMBLED LF 300.0 350.0 $ 0.01 $ 3.50
22 SODDING - TYPE SALT RESISTANT SY 2,500.0 2,474.0 $ 3.00 $ 7,422.00
23 SEEDING (INCLUDING SEED MIX 50B OR 608, FERTILIZER,
MULCH, AND DISK ANCHORING ACRE 0.8 $ 1,440.00 $
24 RELOCATE MAILBOXES EA 3.0 3.0 $ 200.00 $ 600.00
25 4" STREET DRAINTILE WITH GEOTEXTILE SOCK LF 235.0 235.0 $ 4.00 $ 940.00
SUBTOTAL - DIVISION II
$ 185,912.02
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 3
$ 224,646.42
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
1 REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE (15" CMP) LF 185.0 185.0 $ 12.00 $ 2,220.00
2 INSTALL 18" CPP PIPE LF 27.0 27.0 $ 24.00 $ 648.00
3 15" CPP PIPE BEND (22 DEGREES) EA 1.0 1.0 $ 150.00 $ 150.00
4 HIGH EARLY CONCRETE FOR CURB & GUTTER LF 1,675.0 1,675.0 $ 0.39 $ 653.25
5 SINGLE POLY SHEET FOR CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 1,675.0 1,675.0 $ 0.30 $ 502.50
6 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE EA 1.0 1.0 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
$ 5,373.75
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
1 FURNISH AND INSTALL ADDITIONAL CLASS 5 AGGREGATE
BASE TON 935.0 935.0 $ 10.34 $ 9,667.90
2 FURNISH AND INSTALL ADDITIONAL TYPE LV AGG. 3 NON -
WEARING COURSE TON 74.55 74.55 $ 37.60 $ 2,803.08
3 FURNISH AND INSTALL ADDITIONAL 4" DRAINTILE - 125 - LF 294.0 294.0 $ 4.00 $ 1,176.00
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
ft ewe
e
•
CHANGE ORDER
TKDA
Engineers- Architects - Planners
Saint Paul, MN June 29 20 04 Comm. No. 12688 -01 Change Order No. 2
To Arnt Construction Company
for 21st Avenue Street and Storm Sewer Improvements
for City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated
October 27 , 20 03 . The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and
covenants. This Change Order will (increase) (docr aso) (not chango) the contract sum by
Thirteen Thousand Six Hundred Forty Six Dollars and 98/100
($ 13,646.98 ).
This change order provides for changes in the work of this contract according to the attached itemization.
NET CHANGE =
Amount of Original Contract
Additions approved to date (Change Order No. 1)
Deductions approved to date (Nos. )
Contract amount to date
Amount of this Change Order (Add) ) Vie)
Revised Contract Amount
Approved City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA
Owner
13,646.98
$ 228,821.90
$ 5,373.75
$ 234,195.65
$ 13,646.98
$ 247,842.63
Approved Arnt Construction Company
Contractor
By .„;,` — --
-126-
White - Owner
Pink - Contractor
Blue - TKDA
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
1ST AVENUE
STREET AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12688 -01
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION
•
PERIOD ENDING: June 29, 2004
UNIT AMOUNT
UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TO DATE
1 FURNISH AND INSTALL ADDITIONAL CLASS 5 AGGREGATE
BASE TON 935 $ 10.34 $ 9,667.90
2 FURNISH AND INSTALL ADDITIONAL TYPE LV AGG. 3 NON -
WEARING COURSE TON 74.55 $ 37.60 $ 2,803.08
3 FURNISH AND INSTALL ADDITIONAL 4" DRAINTILE LF 294 $ 4.00 $ 1,176.00
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
$ 13,646.98