HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-03-14 Council PacketWORK SESSION AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday, March 3, 2014
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Community Room (not televised)
5:30 P.M.
1. County Road 14 Landscaping Project, Rick DeGardner
2. Wireless Communications Update, Rick DeGardner
3. NorthPointe Residential Development (Regular Agenda Item), Katie Larsen
4. 7309 Lake Drive (Regular Agenda Item), Michael Grochala
5. FEMA Map Revision, Michael Grochala
6. Charter Amendment/Street Reconstruction Plan, Michael Grochala
7. Council/Charter Commission Joint Meeting with Facilitator, Jeff Karlson
8. Monthly Progress Report, Jeff Karlson
9. Schedule Meeting with Advisory Boards
10. 2015 Budget
11. Woods Edge Property Update
12. Review March 10 Meeting Agenda
Adjourn
WS – Item # 4
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 4
Date: March 3, 2014
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala
Re: Exterior Storage – 7309 Lake Drive
Background
On February 22, 2013, following receipt of resident complaints, city staff issued a Cease
and Desist Order to Pinnacle Point, LLC, owner of property located at 7309 Lake Drive.
The order required the discontinuance of the use of property for the exterior storage of
shipping containers and construction trailers. The containers and trailers were being
stacked three to four high approximately 30 feet in height across the 5 acre parcel.
Exterior Storage is not allowed as the principal use of property in the LI, Light Industrial
District.
Discussions regarding compliance have been ongoing between the City, property owner
and the current lessee, Mini Mobile, Inc. The owner has maintained that the use is
consistent with the prior uses on the property and “grandfathered” in. The lessee has
stated that they are not using the property to store containers but rather they are operating
a container rental business.
Following discussion at the September 3, 2013 work session the City Council requested
further background on the property history, including review of the owners leasing
information, and clarification of zoning requirements. This information was provided to
the council at the January 6, 2014 work session. Staff also updated the council on a
discussion with the owner’s representatives and the City Attorney, held on December 5,
2013 to discuss options for compliance. The owner’s representatives disagreed with the
City’s position and are seeking options for settlement as an alternative to any possible
legal proceedings. In an effort to arrive at an outcome beneficial to all parties it was
suggested that an agreement be considered that would allow for the existing use to
continue on a temporary basis until a predetermined date. At that time the property
would be brought into compliance with the ordinance provisions. The City Council
indicated that they would consider such an agreement.
In response the owner has drafted an agreement that provides for the following:
1. Any outside storage on the property inconsistent with the city’s zoning ordinance
shall terminate as of December 31, 2017.
2. Owner and tenant will not challenge City’s regulation of outside storage provided
for the in the zoning ordinance after the Termination Date.
3. The City will not take any enforcement action against the property regarding
outside storage prior to the Termination Date provided it is consistent with the
terms of the agreement.
4. Outside storage will be confined to a specific area of the property, removed from
Lake Drive. No other storage will be allowed except for up to 6 trailers limited in
length to 57 feet.
5. Stacking of portable storage units shall be limited to 2 high. There will be no
stacking of construction trailers.
6. The Lake Drive side of the storage area will be screened in accordance with the
screening requirements of the zoning ordinance.
Requested Council Direction
Staff is requesting council comment on the draft agreement. The agreement is proposed
to be placed on the March 10, 2014 agenda for council consideration.
Attachments
1. Draft Agreement.
1
162441
LAND USE AGREEMENT
This Land Use Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into this _____ day of
_________________, 2014.
WHEREAS, Pinnacle Point, LLC, a limited liability corporation organized under the
laws of the State of Minnesota (“Owner”), owns that certain property located at 7309 Lake Drive
in the City of Lino Lakes, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota legally described as follows:
LOT 3 AUD SUB NO 54, TOG/W THAT PRT OF LOT 1 & 2 SD AUD SUB
LYG S OF N 300 FT THEREOF & LYG NWLY OF WLY R/W LINE OF T H
NO 49 & LYG SWLY OF FOL DESC LINE: COM AT PT OF INTER OF S
LINE OF SD N 300 FT W ITH SD WLY R/W LINE, TH SWLY ALG SD WLY
R/W LINE 127.34 FT TO POB OF SD LINE, TH NWLY AT RT ANG 272.63
FT TO INTER/W S LINE OF SD N 300 FT & SD LINE THERE TERM, EX RD,
SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
PID# 17-31-22-33-003
(“Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Property is located in the City of Lino Lakes, a body corporate and
politic (the “City”) and governed by the City’s ordinances and regulations as well as any and all
applicable Minnesota state statutes; and
WHEREAS, Mobile Mini, Inc. (“Tenant”) is a corporation organized under the laws of
Arizona, which has entered into a Lease, dated March 17, 2011 with the Owner for portions of
the Property, including a portion of the building located on the Property, together with the right
of outside storage on three acres of the Property;
WHEREAS, Tenant’s Lease terminates December 31, 2017;
WHEREAS, Tenant is in the business of leasing out modular construction trailers and
portable storage units used in the construction business and its Lease with Owner provides such
2
162441
portable storage units may be stacked three high in the outside storage it utilizes on the Property;
and
WHEREAS, the Owner, the City, and the Tenant, together constitute the “Parties” to this
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, while the present zoning ordinance of the City precludes outside storage as
a permitted use in the industrial zone in which the Property is located, the Owner contends that
such outside storage is a grandfathered-nonconforming use, which predates the existence of the
City’s zoning ordinance provision precluding such outside storage; and
WHEREAS, the City contests the Owner’s contention that the Property enjoys a
grandfathered-nonconforming use and both the Owner and the City are prepared to submit this
dispute to a court of competent jurisdiction for resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Parties recognize that such a court resolution would be time consuming,
lengthy, expensive, and uncertain; and
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to avoid such a lengthy, expensive and uncertain resolution
by entering into this Agreement, which constitutes a compromise of the various positions of the
parties.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions of this Agreement
the receipt and sufficiency of which as consideration is acknowledged and recognized by all of
the Parties, the Parties do hereby contract and agree as follows:
1. That any existing grandfathered rights to outside storage on the Property
inconsistent with the City’s zoning ordinance shall terminate as of December 31, 2017
(“Termination Date”). After the Termination Date, the Property shall come into full compliance
3
162441
with the City’s zoning or other ordinances related to outside storage, as the same may then apply
to the Property.
2. That the Owner and Tenant will not commence or participate in any challenge to
the City’s regulation of outside storage on the Property as provided for in the City’s zoning
ordinance, or other ordinances, after the Termination Date.
3. That the City agrees that prior to the Termination Date, it will take no action to
enforce its then existing zoning ordinance against the Property with respect to the use of the
Property for outside storage by the Owner or Tenant, subject to the terms of this Agreement.
4. That the above paragraphs shall not preclude any Party from taking any action it
deems necessary or convenient to enforce the terms of this Agreement prior to the Termination
Date.
5. That the Owner and Tenant agree that through the Termination Date they will
confine outside storage to the area described in Exhibit A, attached hereto. The remainder of the
property shall not be used for outside storage, except for the storage of between one (1) and six
(6) trailers, each at a length of no longer than fifty-seven (57) feet.
6. That the Tenant agrees it will restrict the stacking of the portable storage units on
the Property to a maximum of two high. There will be no stacking of construction trailers.
7. That the Owner at its exclusive cost agrees that it will cause Opaque Screening to
be erected along Lake Drive on the south east side of the Property facing Lake Drive from the
entry gate to the southern property line, consistent with the screening standards set forth in City
Zoning Ordinance Section 3, subdivision 4(Q)(6). Such screening shall be erected or provided in
a timely manner, subject to weather conditions.
4
162441
8. That the Parties understand and agree that this Agreement shall be binding upon
the City, the Owner, the Tenant, and any subsequent owner of the Property, or any assignees or
successors in interest to the Owner and the Tenant. To that end, the Parties agree that an original
copy of this Agreement may be filed in the Office of the County Recorder of Anoka County
against the Property to give notice of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
9. Owner and Tenant agree that nothing contained in this Agreement shall change
any terms of their Lease or modify any rights or obligations contained in the Lease.
10. That the Parties acknowledge that each Party has participated in the drafting and
construction of this Agreement and that there shall be no presumptions in favor of any Party with
regard to the interpretation of this Agreement.
11. Governing Law. This Agreement is made and executed under and in all respects
is to be governed and construed under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Venue shall be in the
County of Anoka.
12. Notices. Notices sent by certified mail shall be deemed given on the date of
delivery or attempted delivery as shown on the return-receipt. Notices sent by personal delivery
or courier shall be deemed given on the date of delivery or refusal to accept delivery.
Owner: Pinnacle Point, LLC
501 Royalston Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55405
City: City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Tenant: Mobile Mini, Inc.
7420 S. Kryene Road, Suite 101
Tempe, AZ 85283
With a copy to:
5
162441
Phillip R. Krass
Malkerson Gunn Martin LLP
220 South Sixth Street, Suite 1900
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Any party, by notice given as aforesaid, may change the address to which subsequent
notices are to be sent to such party.
13. Amendment. This Agreement shall be amended only by a written instrument
signed by the Parties.
14. Construction. The captions and headings of the various sections of this
Agreement are for convenience only and are not to be construed as defining or as limiting in any
way the scope or intent of the provisions hereof. Wherever the context requires or permits, the
singular shall include the plural, the plural shall include singular, and the masculine, feminine
and neuter shall be freely interchangeable.
15. Entire Agreement. It is mutually understood and agreed that this Agreement
constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes any and all prior oral or
written understandings, representations or statements, and that no understandings, representatives
or statements, verbal or written, have been made which modify, amend, qualify, or affect the
terms of this Agreement. This Agreement may not be amended except in a writing executed by
the parties.
16. Counterparts. For the convenience of the parties, any number of counterparts
hereof may be executed and each such executed counterpart shall be deemed an original, but all
such counterparts together shall constitute one in the same Agreement.
6
162441
Owner, Diamond Dirt, LLC Subscribed and sworn to before me this
____
day of ___________________, 2014.
By:
Its: ___________________________________
Notary Public
City of Lino Lakes Subscribed and sworn to before me this
____
day of ____________________, 2014.
By:_________________________________
Mayor ____________________________________
Notary Public
By:_________________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me this
____
City Administrator day of ____________________, 2014.
____________________________________
Notary Public
Tenant, Mobile Mini, Inc. Subscribed and sworn to before me this
____
day of ____________________, 2014.
By:__________________________________
Its:____________________________ ____________________________________
Notary Public
WS – Item #5
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 5
Date: March 3, 2014
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala
Re: FEMA Flood Plain Map Update
Background
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) began work in 2009 to update the
Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for Anoka County,
including Lino Lakes. The original FIS and FIRM for Lino Lakes were completed in
1981. The information contained in the study is used to establish actuarial flood
insurance rates and to assist the community in its efforts to promote floodplain
management. Minimum floodplain management requirements for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) are set forth in the Code of Federal
Regulations at 44 CFR, 60.3. Communities are required to adopt a floodplain
management ordinance consistent with this regulation in order for properties to be
eligible for participation in the flood insurance program. The City’s current Flood Plain
Management Ordinance was adopted in 1995.
The new study used information provided by the Rice Creek Watershed District as well
as additional analysis to generate the revised Special Flood Hazard Areas. These are
areas that would be inundated by the base (1-percent-annual-chance) flood, based flood
elevations or depths; zone designations and regulatory boundaries. Based on the new
information the Special Flood Hazard Areas have been modified from the 1982 FIRM.
Based on a review of the map we have seen both expansion and contraction of the Flood
Hazard Areas throughout the City. The most notable change is the increase in flood
elevations for the majority of lakes within the City. The majority of properties effected
by these changes were previously in the flood hazard areas. However the changes may
impact the proximity of structures to flood hazard area.
FEMA published the official notice concerning the appeal process in on February 14 and
February 21. The publication date official starts the 90 day appeal period which will end
on May 21, 2014. Staff has previously submitted comments to FEMA on the proposed
maps. We are working with WSB, the City Engineer, to further review the changes and
prepare, if necessary, an appeal response.
FEMA has also provided documentation that 153 existing Letter of Map Amendments
(LOMA’s) completed over the years, on individual properties, will remain in effect upon
the effective date of the FIRM. The Letter of Map Amendment is a document approved
by FEMA that indicates that an individual lot or structure is outside the regulatory flood
elevation.
Digital copies of the FIRM and FIS report are available on the following website:
http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata. The following list of panel numbers
covers the City of Lino Lakes:
27003C0335E 27003C0344E 27003C0345E 27003C03355E
27003C0360E 27003C0365E 27003C0366E 27003C03370E
Requested Council Direction
No action is necessary at this time.
Attachments
1. Lake Flood Elevation Chart
Comparison of Lake Flood Elevation Levels
Lake
1982 FIRM
Elevation
2014 FIRM
Elevation
Amelia 910.0 910.2
Bald Eagle 912.6 912.5
Baldwin 885.2 887.0
Centerville 886.3 887.9
Marshan 886.1 887.0
Otter 912.6 912.7
Peltier 886.7 887.7
Rondeau 888.1 887.6
Reshanau 886.0 887.0
Rice 886.0 887.0
WS – Item # 6
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 6
Date: March 3, 2014
To: City Council
From: Michael Grochala
Re: Charter Amendment/Street Reconstruction Plan
Background
The City Council discussed three (3) options for advancing street reconstruction projects
within the City at the February 3, 2014 work session. They were:
Option 1A: Proceed under current Charter Provisions
Option 1B: Propose an amendment to the Charter
Option 2: Pay for 100% of the improvements with property taxes
using Street Reconstruction Bonds.
The City Council directed staff to proceed with all 3 options. Additionally, council
directed staff to begin preparation of a Street Reconstruction Plan.
Charter Amendment
Staff has developed two charter amendment options for council consideration.
Amendment Option 1 is generally consistent with the amendment placed before voters in
2012. The following changes have been incorporated:
1. Clarifies language regarding benefiting properties to address concerns over
area assessments.
2. Changes the percentage of signatures needed to require an election from 12%
to 5%.
3. Changes the period of time residents would have to sign a petition for an
election from 30 days to 45 days.
Amendment Option 2 provides a different alternative than what was previously
considered. The proposed amendment carries forward much of the existing charter
process, incorporates components of the 2012 amendment providing consistency with
existing state law and provides a specific exemption from election requirements of the
charter for street reconstruction projects.
Generally speaking the amendment would allow for public improvement projects to be
undertaken in accordance with state law. As with the 2012 amendment the procedural
requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 would be followed.
Section 8.02, Subdivision 2 would provide for the notice of hearing to include an estimate
of the proposed assessment for each parcel proposed to be assessed.
Section 8.02, Subdivision 3, generally follows the existing charter language regarding the
60 day petitioning process with the exception of the procedural requirements that would
now follow the provisions of state law.
Section 8.02, Subdivision 4, generally follows the charter requirement that an election be
held if ad valorem taxes (property taxes) are proposed to be used.
Section 8.02, Subdivision 5, is a new section specifically relating to Street reconstruction
and bituminous overlays. This section would allow for the City to proceed without
election on projects that meet the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475.
These requirements include:
a) Preparation of a 5 year street reconstruction plan
b) Public hearing
c) Unanimous vote of the City Council
d) 30 day period for petition to hold an election. Petition must be signed by
voters equal to 5% of the votes cast in the last municipal general election.
e) If no petition is received the city may issue bonds without election.
Section 8.02, Subdivision 6, generally follows state law provisions for ordering a project
but incorporates the charter language to address the allowable timeline for doing so.
Section 8.02, Subdivision 7, provides requirements in the event that the project is not
allowed in accordance with state law provisions. In this case the question cannot be
resubmitted to the voters for a period of 180 days (6 months). If it fails again it cannot be
submitted for a period of 1 year. The current charter does not allow the City Council to
take any action of a proposed project for one year if defeated.
Section 8.02, Subdivision 8, allows for projects that are petitioned for by 100% of
property owners, paying 100% of costs to be ordered immediately by council. The
current charter requires the public hearing to be held and requires owners to supply a
separate petition to waive 50 of the 60 day petition period.
The balance of the amendment renumbers existing sections.
Staff is still working with the City Attorney to review the proposed amendments.
Additional changes may be necessary upon completion of that review.
Amendment by ordinance would require council approval of the 1st reading by March of
2014. The Charter Commission would have up to 150 days to review. The amendment
would then be sent to the voters for consideration in the November election. If approved
and depending on the scope of the amendment the public improvement process would
likely start in 2015 with construction taking place in 2016.
Draft Street Reconstruction Plan
Following council direction staff worked with WSB to prepare a draft Street
Reconstruction Plan. The plan was based on the pavement management ratings and
consideration of average daily traffic on street segments. The draft plan proposes a 5
phase reconstruction project that addresses approximately 10 miles of city streets. The
timeline for completing the plan phasing would be based on a financial analysis to
determine the preferred bond structure. As note in the plan some project areas may, after
further evaluation, be identified as a candidate for reclamation. In such cases the plan
would be adjusted to accommodate street segments.
Requested Council Direction
Staff is requesting council direction on which Charter Amendment to forward for
consideration. Staff is also requesting council comment on the draft Street
Reconstruction Plan.
Attachments
1. Charter Amendment Option 1
2. Charter Amendment Option 2
3. Draft Street Reconstruction Plan
1st Reading: March 10, 2014 Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 03-14
OPTION 1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY
CHARTER, REGARDING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes does ordain:
Section 1. That Chapter 8, Section 8.01, 8.02, 8.03, 8.04, 8.05 and 8.06 of the Lino
Lakes City Charter be and are hereby repealed:
Section 8.01. Power to Make Improvements and Levy Assessments.
The City may make any type of public improvements not forbidden by law and levy special
assessments to pay all or any part of the cost of such improvements as are of a local character.
The total assessments for any local improvement may not exceed the cost of the improvement,
including all costs and expenses connected therewith, with interest. No assessment shall exceed
the benefits to the property.
Section 8.02. Effective Charter Provisions, Except as Provided in
Section 8.07. Local improvements (the term “local improvement" shall mean a public
improvement financed partly or wholly from special assessments) shall be carried out
exclusively under the provisions of this Charter. (Amended 11/23/93, Ordinance No. 93-19)
Section 8.03. Local Improvement Ordinances and Regulations. Within one hundred
twenty (120) days after this Charter goes into effect and before local improvements can be acted
upon, the Council shall enact suitable ordinance(s) governing local improvements and special
assessments. The ordinance(s) shall provide a complete working code covering the
determination of assessments and assessment districts, public hearings, appeals from a collection
of assessments, penalties for delinquency in making payments, financing of said assessments,
and the certifying of unpaid assessments for collection by the proper County officer. Said
ordinance(s) shall also provide for installment payments and notices to be given thereof,
appellate procedure, reassessment, if necessary, and all other matters appropriate to the subject of
local improvements and assessments. After the adoption of such ordinance(s) providing for local
improvements, all procedures in compliance therewith shall conform to the regulations as set
forth in such ordinance(s) and as otherwise contained in this Charter.
Section 8.04. Special Assessment Procedure.
Subdivision 1. All improvements to be paid for by special assessments against the
benefitted property shall be instituted by either, (1) a petition of at least twenty-five percent
(25%) in number of the benefitted property owners (A benefitted property owner can only sign
once regardless of the number of benefitted parcels owned and a benefitted parcel can only have
one signature.) together with a resolution adopted by an affirmative vote of the majority of all of
the Council, or, (2) a resolution adopted by a four-fifths affirmative vote of all of the Council.
The Council resolution shall state the nature and scope of proposed improvement including the
number of benefitted property owners, and shall provide means to obtain a cost estimate which
shall set forth the cost of the improvement both in unit price and in total thereof. Upon receipt of
such estimate, the Council shall by resolution set a date for a public hearing on the proposed
improvement setting forth therein the time, place and purpose of such hearing. Such resolution
shall be published twice, at least one week apart, in the official newspaper of the City no less
than two (2) weeks prior to the date of said hearing, and in addition thereto, a copy of such
resolution including estimate unit prices and estimated total price thereof shall be mailed to each
benefitted property owner at his/her last known address at least two (2) weeks prior to the date of
said hearing. Failure to give mailed notice, or any defects in the notice, shall not invalidate the
proceedings. At such hearing the City shall receive any written and oral statements, and hear any
petitioners for or against the proposed improvement. At such hearing the City Council shall
present a special assessment formula and an analysis of the assessment income expected to offset
the proposed improvement cost. A period of sixty (60) days shall elapse after the public hearing
before any further action shall be taken by the Council, on the proposed improvement. If within
such sixty (60) day period, in a petitioning process independent of the initiating process, a
petition against such improvement be filed with the Council, signed by a majority of the owners
proposed to be assessed for such improvement, or when the improvement has been petitioned
for, signed by a number of the owners proposed to be assessed for such improvement, at least
equal to the number of those who petitioned for the improvement, the Council shall not make
such improvement at the expense of the property benefitted, unless, in the meantime there be
filed with the Council a petition asking that the improvement be made, signed by property
owners proposed to be assessed for such improvement at least equal in number to those who
signed the petition against the improvement; in which event the Council may disregard the
petition against the improvement. Any person whose name appears on a petition to the Council
for a local improvement, may withdraw his/her name by st atement in writing filed with the
Council before such petition is presented to the Council.
Subdivision 2. Regardless of the provisions of Subdivision 1 of this section, when less
than one hundred (100%) percent of the estimated cost of the proposed improvement is to be
paid for by special assessments, connection charges, or any outside funding sources other than
the City general fund, the Council shall submit the proposed local improvement and its
assessment formula to the voters of the City at the next general election. If no general election is
scheduled to occur within 160 days after the conclusion of the public hearing, the Council shall
schedule a special election as soon as practicable to submit said improvement and its associated
assessment formula to the City's voters. If a majority of those voting on said improvement and
associated assessment formula are opposed, the Council shall not proceed with the local
improvement as proposed. (Amended 01/13/2014)
Subdivision 3. When a proposed improvement is allowed under the foregoing
subdivision, and the public record of the proposed improvement contains all of the evidence on
which the Council shall base their decision, the Council may by resolution, at any time between
sixty (60) days and one (1) year after the conclusion of the public hearing, proceed on the
improvement. If after bids are received on the project the proposed contract exceeds the
estimated cost of the engineer stated at the public hearing held under Subdivision 1 by more than
ten (10%) percent, the City Council may not award the contract for the proposed improvement,
but may rebid the project for one (1) time only.
Subdivision 4. When a proposed improvement is disallowed under the foregoing
subdivisions, the Council shall not vote on the same improvement within a period of one (1) year
after the public hearing on said improvement.
Section 8.05. Assessments for Services. The Council may provide by ordinance that the
cost of City services to streets, sidewalks, or other public or private property may be assessed
against property benefitted and may be collected in the same manner as special assessments.
Such costs shall not be deemed to be "special assessments" for the purposes set forth in Section
8.03 of this chapter.
Section 8.06. When under the provisions of section 8.04, Subdivision 1, an improvement
is petitioned for by one hundred (100%) percent of the benefitted property owners, such property
owners may after the mailing of notice of a public hearing, petition to waive fifty (50) of the
sixty (60) days waiting period. After such petition, the City Council may immediately order the
proposed project. (Amended)
Section 2. That Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter be amended by adding thereto
a new Section 8.01 to read as follows:
Section 8.01. Local Improvements Defined; Charter Provisions Effective.
Subdivision 1. For the purposes of this Chapter, the term “local improvements” means
any public improvements financed in whole or in part from special assessments.
Subdivision 2. For the purposes of any objection or petition under this Chapter, (a) each
parcel is considered to have one owner, and only one person or entity may sign an objection or
petition on behalf of any additional owners of that parcel; and (b) if the same person or entity
owns more than one parcel affected by a local improvement, that person or entity may sign an
objection or petition only once; and (c) for the purpose of identifying recipients of any notice
under this Chapter, owners are determined in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section
429.031, subdivision 1.
Subdivision 3. The City may undertake any local improvements not forbidden by law
and levy special assessments to pay all or any part of the cost of such local improvements. The
principal amount of special assessments for any local improvements shall not exceed the cost of
the local improvement, including all design, financing and related costs, and shall not exceed the
benefit to the property determined in accordance with state law.
Subdivision 4. Local improvements shall be carried out exclusively under the provisions
of this Charter, except to the extent otherwise provided in Section 8.02.
Section 3. That Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter be amended by adding thereto
a new Section 8.02 to read as follows:
Section 8.02. Local Improvement Procedure.
Subdivision 1. Local improvements shall be carried out in accordance with state law,
except as provided in this Section.
Subdivision 2. If more than 50 percent of the owners of the real property within the area
proposed to be assessed abutting on the streets named as defined in the mailed notice of the
improvement hearing under Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031, subdivision 1 sign written
objections regarding the local improvements, and file such objections with the city clerk prior to
the improvement hearing or present such objections to the presiding officer at the hearing, then
after the hearing the council shall schedule a special meeting to be held at least 45 days a fter the
date of the hearing. At least 10 days prior to the date of the special meeting, the city shall
publish notice of the special meeting and mail notice of the special meeting to all owners who
received the initial notice under Section 429.031, subdivision 1. Such published and mailed
notice shall include all the information provided in the initial mailed notice, along with a
statement as to the number and percentage of affected owners who filed objections at or before
the hearing. At the special meeting, the council shall hear additional testimony on behalf of any
objecting property owners, and may consider further written or oral testimony from appropriate
city officials and other witnesses, as to the nature of the local improvements, the advisability of
proceeding with such local improvements, the proposed financing for such local improvements,
any proposed amendments to the plans or financing for such local improvements, and the
methodology used to calculate individual special assessments for such local improvements.
Subdivision 3. A resolution ordering the local improvements (as such local
improvements may have been amended in response to the hearing or special meeting under
Section 8.02, Subdivision 2) may be adopted at any time within six months after the date of the
special meeting by vote of a majority of all members of the council when the local improvement
has been petitioned for by not less than 35 percent of the owners of the real property within the
area proposed to be assessed abutting on the streets named defined in the petition as the location
of the local improvement; and when there has been no such petition, the resolution may be
adopted only by vote of four-fifths of all members of the council. The effective date of a
resolution ordering the local improvement must be at least 30 days after adoption. Within five
days after adoption of the resolution, a summary of the resolution must be mailed to the affected
owners. If more than 50 percent of the affected owners sign written objections regarding the
resolution, and file such objections with the city clerk prior to the effective date of the resolution,
the resolution does not become effective and the local improvement is not ordered. Any
objections filed under Section 8.02, Subdivision 2 will not constitute objections under this
Subdivision 3. If the required number of owners do not file a timely objection under this
subdivision, the local improvement may proceed after the effective date of the resolution, except
as otherwise provided in Subdivisions 5 and 6.
Subdivision 4. If timely objections are not filed by the required number of property
owners under Subdivision 2 of this Section, Subdivisions 2 and 3 of this Section do not thereafter
apply to the subject local improvements, and all subsequent procedures for approval of and
levying of special assessments for those local improvements shall be in accordance with state
law, except as otherwise provided in this subdivision and Subdivisions 5 and 6. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031, subdivision 1, clause (f), a
resolution ordering the local improvement may be adopted at any time within six months after
the date of the hearing by vote of a majority of all members of the council when the local
improvement has been petitioned for by not less than 35 percent of the owners of the real
property within the area proposed to be assessed as abutting on the streets named defined in the
petition as the location of the local improvement; and when there has been no such petition, the
resolution may be adopted only by vote of four-fifths of all members of the council.
Subdivision 5. If any portion of the cost of a local improvement is to be paid from ad
valorem taxes, the ordering of the local improvement shall be suspended for 30 45 days after the
effective date of the resolution ordering the local improvement under subdivision 3 (if no timely
objection was filed by the required number of owners) or under subdivision 4. If a petition
requesting a vote on the local improvement signed by registered voters equal to at least 12 5
percent of the votes cast in the last general municipal election is filed with the City Clerk by the
end of that 3045-day period, then the City may proceed with the local improvement, and may
issue general obligation bonds to finance the local improvement, only after obtaining approval of
a majority of the voters voting on the question at a general or special election. The ballot shall
generally describe the proposed local improvement, the estimated principal amount of bonds to
be issued to finance the local improvement, and the estimated percentage of total debt service on
the bonds expected to be paid from ad valorem taxes.
Subdivision 6. If the voters do not approve a local improvement and issuance of bonds
therefore at an election required by subdivision 5, the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section
475.58, subd. 1a shall apply.
Subdivision 5. When a proposed improvement is disallowed under the foregoing
subdivisions, the Council shall not vote on the same improvement within a period of one (1) year
after the public hearing on said improvement, unless it is determined by the Council that a sooner
vote is necessary to preserve public peace, health, morals, safety or welfare.
Section 4. That Chapter 8, Section 8.07, of the Lino Lakes City Charter is hereby
repealed:
Section 8.07. Local Improvement; Special Provisions.
Subdivision 1. Except as provided in Subdivision 3, i In the geographic areas of the City
described in Subdivision 2, the construction of local improvements, the levy of special
assessment for the financing of those improvements must be conducted in accordance with
procedures specified in state law.
Subdivision 2. Subdivision 1 applies to land within three (3) geographic areas, each not
exceeding 430 acres, legally described as follows:
AREA NO. 1 - Trunk Highway #49 (Hodgson Road) and County State Aid
Highway #23 Intersection (Lake Drive)
-All Government Lot 1, Section 30, T31, R22, PIN. 30-31-22-210001
-That part of Lots 14, 15, 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 151 lying south and east of
State Trunk Highway #49 (Hodgson Road) right-of-way
AREA NO. 2 - Interstate I35E and County Road 242 (Main Street)
Interchange
- Northeast one quarter (1/4) of Section 24
- That part of the southeast one quarter (1/4) of Section 24 lying north of Cedar Street
- East one half (1/2) of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 24
- East one half (1/2) of the northwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 24
AREA NO. 3 Interstate I35W and Trunk Highway #49 (Lake Drive)
Interchange
- North one half (1/2) of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 18
- That part of the south one half (1/2) of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 18 lying
north of the Interstate I35W right-of-way
- That part of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 17 lying west of Trunk Highway
#49 (Lake Drive) right-of-way
- All of the northwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 17 with the exception of that part of the
southeast one quarter (1/4) of said northwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 17 as
follows: beginning at a point at the intersection of the south line of said southeast one
quarter (1/4) of the northwest one quarter (1/4) with the east right-of-way line of
Trunk Highway #49; thence northeasterly along said right-of-way line 938.14 feet (+
or -) ; thence southeasterly 672. 39 (+ or -) feet to east line of said southeast one
quarter (1/4) of the northwest one quarter (1/4); thence south along said east line 588.5
(+ or -) feet to the south line of said southeast one quarter (1/4) of the northwest one
quarter (1/4); thence westerly along said south line 1021.59 feet (+ or -) to the point of
beginning.
- The north 720 feet of that part of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of the northeast one
quarter (1/4) of Section 17 lying west of the Anoka County Park property
- That part of the north one half (1/2) of the northeast one quarter (1/4) of Section 17 lying
west of the Anoka County Park property
- That part of the north one half (1/2) of the northeast one quarter (1/4) of Section 17
lying west of the Anoka County Park property
- The south one half (1/2) of southeast one quarter (1/4) of the southeast one quarter (1/4)
of Section 8
- The southeast one quarter (1/4) of the southeast one quarter (1/4) of the southwest one
quarter (1/4) of Section 8
- The east 330 feet (+ or -) of the northeast one quarter (1/4) of the southeast one quarter
(1/4) of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 8
Subdivision 3. When construction of local improvements, the levy of special assessments
for the financing of those improvements specially benefit a parcel of real property, in an area
described in subdivision 2, on which a single family, owner occupied residential unit existed on
September 30, 1993, the owner/occupant of such residential unit may file a petition with the City
Clerk objecting to the special assessment to be levied against his/her parcel. Such petition shall
be filed with the City at or before the first public hearing to be held on the project. After the
filing of such petition the City may not specially assess such owner's property for the
improvements constructed unless the owner, at his/her option, in the future elects to connect to or
use the improvements constructed by the City. Any notice of hearing mailed to such single
family, owner occupied units shall include notice of the property owner's right to object to the
assessments as granted in this paragraph. This exception terminates on the first day that an
owner occupied residential unit no longer exists on the parcel of real property.
_________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
_______________________________
Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of March, 2014.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council Member
__________and was duly seconded by Council Member ________and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
None
1st Reading: March 10, 2014 Publication:
2nd Reading: Effective:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 03-14
OPTION 2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY
CHARTER, REGARDING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes does ordain:
Section 1. That Chapter 8, Section 8.01, 8.02, 8.03, 8.04, 8.05 and 8.06 of the Lino
Lakes City Charter be and are hereby repealed:
Section 8.01. Power to Make Improvements and Levy Assessments.
The City may make any type of public improvements not forbidden by law and levy special
assessments to pay all or any part of the cost of such improvements as are of a local character.
The total assessments for any local improvement may not exceed the cost of the improvement,
including all costs and expenses connected therewith, with interest. No assessment shall exceed
the benefits to the property.
Section 8.02. Effective Charter Provisions, Except as Provided in
Section 8.07. Local improvements (the term “local improvement" shall mean a public
improvement financed partly or wholly from special assessments) shall be carried out
exclusively under the provisions of this Charter. (Amended 11/23/93, Ordinance No. 93-19)
Section 8.03. Local Improvement Ordinances and Regulations. Within one hundred
twenty (120) days after this Charter goes into effect and before local improvements can be acted
upon, the Council shall enact suitable ordinance(s) governing local improvements and special
assessments. The ordinance(s) shall provide a complete working code covering the
determination of assessments and assessment districts, public hearings, appeals from a collection
of assessments, penalties for delinquency in making payments, financing of said assessments,
and the certifying of unpaid assessments for collection by the proper County officer. Said
ordinance(s) shall also provide for installment payments and notices to be given thereof,
appellate procedure, reassessment, if necessary, and all other matters appropriate to the subject of
local improvements and assessments. After the adoption of such ordinance(s) providing for local
improvements, all procedures in compliance therewith shall conform to the regulations as set
forth in such ordinance(s) and as otherwise contained in this Charter.
Section 8.04. Special Assessment Procedure.
Subdivision 1. All improvements to be paid for by special assessments against the
benefitted property shall be instituted by either, (1) a petition of at least twenty-five percent
(25%) in number of the benefitted property owners (A benefitted property owner can only sign
once regardless of the number of benefitted parcels owned and a benefitted parcel can only have
one signature.) together with a resolution adopted by an affirmative vote of the majority of all of
the Council, or, (2) a resolution adopted by a four-fifths affirmative vote of all of the Council.
The Council resolution shall state the nature and scope of proposed improvement including the
number of benefitted property owners, and shall provide means to obtain a cost estimate which
shall set forth the cost of the improvement both in unit price and in total thereof. Upon receipt of
such estimate, the Council shall by resolution set a date for a public hearing on the proposed
improvement setting forth therein the time, place and purpose of such hearing. Such resolution
shall be published twice, at least one week apart, in the official newspaper of the City no less
than two (2) weeks prior to the date of said hearing, and in addition thereto, a copy of such
resolution including estimate unit prices and estimated total price thereof shall be mailed to each
benefitted property owner at his/her last known address at least two (2) weeks prior to the date of
said hearing. Failure to give mailed notice, or any defects in the notice, shall not invalidate the
proceedings. At such hearing the City shall receive any written and oral statements, and hear any
petitioners for or against the proposed improvement. At such hearing the City Council shall
present a special assessment formula and an analysis of the assessment income expected to offset
the proposed improvement cost. A period of sixty (60) days shall elapse after the public hearing
before any further action shall be taken by the Council, on the proposed improvement. If within
such sixty (60) day period, in a petitioning process independent of the initiating process, a
petition against such improvement be filed with the Council, signed by a majority of the owners
proposed to be assessed for such improvement, or when the improvement has been petitioned
for, signed by a number of the owners proposed to be assessed for such improvement, at least
equal to the number of those who petitioned for the improvement, the Council shall not make
such improvement at the expense of the property benefitted, unless, in the meantime there be
filed with the Council a petition asking that the improvement be made, signed by property
owners proposed to be assessed for such improvement at least equal in number to those who
signed the petition against the improvement; in which event the Council may disregard the
petition against the improvement. Any person whose name appears on a petition to the Council
for a local improvement, may withdraw his/her name by st atement in writing filed with the
Council before such petition is presented to the Council.
Subdivision 2. Regardless of the provisions of Subdivision 1 of this section, when less
than one hundred (100%) percent of the estimated cost of the proposed improvement is to be
paid for by special assessments, connection charges, or any outside funding sources other than
the City general fund, the Council shall submit the proposed local improvement and its
assessment formula to the voters of the City at the next general election. If no general election is
scheduled to occur within 160 days after the conclusion of the public hearing, the Council shall
schedule a special election as soon as practicable to submit said improvement and its associated
assessment formula to the City's voters. If a majority of those voting on said improvement and
associated assessment formula are opposed, the Council shall not proceed with the local
improvement as proposed. (Amended 01/13/2014)
Subdivision 3. When a proposed improvement is allowed under the foregoing
subdivision, and the public record of the proposed improvement contains all of the evidence on
which the Council shall base their decision, the Council may by resolution, at any time between
sixty (60) days and one (1) year after the conclusion of the public hearing, proceed on the
improvement. If after bids are received on the project the proposed contract exceeds the
estimated cost of the engineer stated at the public hearing held under Subdivision 1 by more than
ten (10%) percent, the City Council may not award the contract for the proposed improvement,
but may rebid the project for one (1) time only.
Subdivision 4. When a proposed improvement is disallowed under the foregoing
subdivisions, the Council shall not vote on the same improvement within a period of one (1) year
after the public hearing on said improvement.
Section 8.05. Assessments for Services. The Council may provide by ordinance that the
cost of City services to streets, sidewalks, or other public or private property may be assessed
against property benefitted and may be collected in the same manner as special assessments.
Such costs shall not be deemed to be "special assessments" for the purposes set forth in Section
8.03 of this chapter.
Section 8.06. When under the provisions of section 8.04, Subdivision 1, an improvement
is petitioned for by one hundred (100%) percent of the benefitted property owners, such property
owners may after the mailing of notice of a public hearing, petition to waive fifty (50) of the
sixty (60) days waiting period. After such petition, the City Council may immediately order the
proposed project. (Amended)
Section 2. That Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter be amended by adding thereto
a new Section 8.01 to read as follows:
Section 8.01. Local Improvements Defined; Charter Provisions Effective.
Subdivision 1. For the purposes of this Chapter, the term “local improvements” means
any public improvements financed in whole or in part from special assessments.
Subdivision 2. For the purposes of any objection or petition under this Chapter, (a) each
parcel is considered to have one owner, and only one person or entity may sign an objection or
petition on behalf of any additional owners of that parcel; and (b) if the same person or entity
owns more than one parcel affected by a local improvement, that person or entity may sign an
objection or petition only once; and (c) for the purpose of identifying recipients of any notice
under this Chapter, owners are determined in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section
429.031, subdivision 1.
Subdivision 3. The City may undertake any local improvements not forbidden by law
and levy special assessments to pay all or any part of the cost of such local improvements. The
principal amount of special assessments for any local improvements shall not exceed the cost of
the local improvement, including all design, financing and related costs, and shall not exceed the
benefit to the property determined in accordance with state law.
Subdivision 4. Local improvements shall be carried out exclusively under the provisions
of this Charter, except to the extent otherwise provided in Section 8.02.
Section 3. That Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter be amended by adding thereto
a new Section 8.02 to read as follows:
Section 8.02. Local Improvement Procedure.
Subdivision 1. Local improvements shall be carried out in accordance with state law,
except as provided in this Section.
Subdivision 2, The notice of hearing mailed to th e owner of each parcel within the area
proposed to be assessed shall include, in addition to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 429.031, Subdivision 1, an estimate of the proposed assessment for each individual
parcel proposed to be assessed.
Subdivision 3. A period of sixty (60) days shall elapse, after the public hearing held
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031, subdivision 1, before any further action shall be
taken by the Council, on the proposed improvement. If within such sixty (60) day period, in a
petitioning process independent of the initiating process, a petition against such improvement be
filed with the Council, signed by a majority of the owners proposed to be assessed for such
improvement, or when the improvement has been petitioned for, signed by a number of the
owners proposed to be assessed for such improvement, at least equal to the number of those who
petitioned for the improvement, the Council shall not make such improvement at the expense of
the property benefitted, unless, in the meantime there be filed with the Council a petition asking
that the improvement be made, signed by property owners proposed to be assessed for such
improvement at least equal in number to those who signed the petition against the improvement;
in which event the Council may disregard the petition against the improvement. Any person
whose name appears on a petition to the Council for a local improvement, may withdraw his/her
name by statement in writing filed with the Council before such petition is presented to the
Council.
Subdivision 4. If any portion of the cost of a local improvement is to be paid from ad
valorem taxes, then the City may proceed with the local improvement, and may issue general
obligation bonds to finance the local improvement, only after obtaining approval of a majority of
the voters voting on the question at a general or special election. The ballot shall generally
describe the proposed local improvement, the estimated principal amount of bonds to be issued
to finance the local improvement, and the estimated percentage of total debt service on the bonds
expected to be paid from ad valorem taxes.
Subdivision 5. Street reconstruction and bituminous overlays. The City may without
regard for the election requirement under subdivision 4, proceed with the improvement project
and may issue general obligation bonds if the conditions of Minnesota Statues, 475.58,
Subdivision 3b are met.
Subdivision 6. When a proposed improvement is allowed under subdivisions 3,4 or 5,
notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031, subdivision 1,
clause (f), a resolution ordering the local improvement may be adopted at any time within sixty
(60) days and one (1) year after the date of the public hearing by vote of a majority of all
members of the council when the local improvement has been petitioned for by not less than 35
percent of the owners of the real property within the area proposed to be assessed as defined in
the petition as the location of the local improvement; and when there has been no such petition,
the resolution may be adopted only by vote of four-fifths of all members of the council.
Subdivision 7. If the voters do not approve a local improvement and issuance of bonds
therefore at an election required by subdivision 4 or subdivision 5 as may be required, the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 475.58, subd. 1a shall apply.
Subdivision 8. When under the provisions of section 8.02, Subdivision 1, an
improvement is petitioned for by one hundred (100%) percent of the benefitted property owners,
the City Council may immediately order the proposed project.
Section 4. That Chapter 8, Section 8.05, of the Lino Lakes City Charter be
amended as follows
Section 8.053. Assessments for Services. The Council may provide by ordinance
that the cost of City services to streets, sidewalks, or other public or private property may be
assessed against property benefitted and may be collected in the same manner as special
assessments. Such costs shall not be deemed to be "special assessments" for the purposes set
forth in Section 8.03 of this chapter.
Section 5. That Chapter 8, Section 8.07, of the Lino Lakes City Charter be amended as
follows
Section 8.074. Local Improvement; Special Provisions.
Subdivision 1. Except as provided in Subdivision 3, in the geographic areas of the City
described in Subdivision 2, the construction of local improvements, the levy of special
assessment for the financing of those improvements must be conducted in accordance with
procedures specified in state law.
Subdivision 2. Subdivision 1 applies to land within three (3) geographic areas, each not
exceeding 430 acres, legally described as follows:
AREA NO. 1 - Trunk Highway #49 (Hodgson Road) and County State Aid
Highway #23 Intersection (Lake Drive)
-All Government Lot 1, Section 30, T31, R22, PIN. 30-31-22-210001
-That part of Lots 14, 15, 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 151 lying south and east of
State Trunk Highway #49 (Hodgson Road) right-of-way
AREA NO. 2 - Interstate I35E and County Road 242 (Main Street)
Interchange
- Northeast one quarter (1/4) of Section 24
- That part of the southeast one quarter (1/4) of Section 24 lying north of Cedar Street
- East one half (1/2) of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 24
- East one half (1/2) of the northwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 24
AREA NO. 3 Interstate I35W and Trunk Highway #49 (Lake Drive)
Interchange
- North one half (1/2) of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 18
- That part of the south one half (1/2) of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 18 lying
north of the Interstate I35W right-of-way
- That part of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 17 lying west of Trunk Highway
#49 (Lake Drive) right-of-way
- All of the northwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 17 with the exception of that part of the
southeast one quarter (1/4) of said northwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 17 as
follows: beginning at a point at the intersection of the south line of said southeast one
quarter (1/4) of the northwest one quarter (1/4) with the east right-of-way line of
Trunk Highway #49; thence northeasterly along said right-of-way line 938.14 feet (+
or -) ; thence southeasterly 672. 39 (+ or -) feet to east line of said southeast one
quarter (1/4) of the northwest one quarter (1/4); thence south along said east line 588.5
(+ or -) feet to the south line of said southeast one quarter (1/4) of the northwest one
quarter (1/4); thence westerly along said south line 1021.59 feet (+ or -) to the point of
beginning.
- The north 720 feet of that part of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of the northeast one
quarter (1/4) of Section 17 lying west of the Anoka County Park property
- That part of the north one half (1/2) of the northeast one quarter (1/4) of Section 17 lying
west of the Anoka County Park property
- That part of the north one half (1/2) of the northeast one quarter (1/4) of Section 17
lying west of the Anoka County Park property
- The south one half (1/2) of southeast one quarter (1/4) of the southeast one quarter (1/4)
of Section 8
- The southeast one quarter (1/4) of the southeast one quarter (1/4) of the southwest one
quarter (1/4) of Section 8
- The east 330 feet (+ or -) of the northeast one quarter (1/4) of the southeast one quarter
(1/4) of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 8
Subdivision 3. When construction of local improvements, the levy of special assessments
for the financing of those improvements specially benefit a parcel of real property, in an area
described in subdivision 2, on which a single family, owner occupied residential unit existed on
September 30, 1993, the owner/occupant of such residential unit may file a petition with the City
Clerk objecting to the special assessment to be levied against his/her parcel. Such petition shall
be filed with the City at or before the first public hearing to be held on the project. After the
filing of such petition the City may not specially assess such owner's property for the
improvements constructed unless the owner, at his/her option, in the future elects to connect to or
use the improvements constructed by the City. Any notice of hearing mailed to such single
family, owner occupied units shall include notice of the property owner's right to object to the
assessments as granted in this paragraph. This exception terminates on the first day that an
owner occupied residential unit no longer exists on the parcel of real property.
______________________________
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
_____________________________________
Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of March, 2014.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council Member
__________________and was duly seconded by Council Member _______________ and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
References
429.031 PRELIMINARY PLANS, HEARINGS.
Subdivision 1.Preparation of plans, notice of hearing.
(a) Before the municipality awards a contract for an improvement or orders it made by day
labor, or before the municipality may assess any portion of the cost of an improvement to be
made under a cooperative agreement with the state or another political subdivision for sharing
the cost of making the improvement, the council shall hold a public hearing on the proposed
improvement following two publications in the newspaper of a notice stating the time and place
of the hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the estimated cost, and the area proposed
to be assessed. The two publications must be a week apart, and the hearing must be at least three
days after the second publication. Not less than ten days before the hearing, notice of the hearing
must also be mailed to the owner of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed and must
contain a statement that a reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessment will be available at
the hearing, but failure to give mailed notice or any defects in the notice does not invalidate the
proceedings. For the purpose of giving mailed notice, owners are those shown as owners on the
records of the county auditor or, in any county where tax statements are mailed by the county
treasurer, on the records of the county treasurer; but other appropriate records may be used for
this purpose. For properties that are tax exempt or subject to taxation on a gross earnings basis
and are not listed on the records of the county auditor or the county treasurer, the owners may be
ascertained by any practicable means, and mailed notice must be given them as provided in this
subdivision.
(b) Before the adoption of a resolution ordering the improvement, the council shall secure
from the city engineer or some other competent person of its selection a report advising it in a
preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost -effective, and
feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other
improvement. The report must also include the estimated cost of the improvement as
recommended. A reasonable estimate of the total amount to be assessed, and a description of the
methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels, must be available at
the hearing. No error or omission in the report invalidates the proceeding unless it materially
prejudices the interests of an owner.
(c) If the report is not prepared by an employee of a municipality, the compensation for
preparing the report under this subdivision must be based on the following factors:
(1) the time and labor required;
(2) the experience and knowledge of the preparer;
(3) the complexity and novelty of the problems involved; and
(4) the extent of the responsibilities assumed.
(d) The compensation must not be based primarily on a percentage of the estimated cost of
the improvement.
(e) The council may also take other steps prior to the hearing, including, among other
things, the preparation of plans and specifications and the advertisement for bids that will in its
judgment provide helpful information in determining the desirability and feasibility of the
improvement.
(f) The hearing may be adjourned from time to time, and a resolution ordering the
improvement may be adopted at any time within six months after the date of the hearing by vote
of a majority of all members of the council when the improvement has been petitioned for by the
owners of not less than 35 percent in frontage of the real property abutting on the streets named
in the petition as the location of the improvement. When there has been no such petition, the
resolution may be adopted only by vote of four-fifths of all members of the council; provided
that if the mayor of the municipality is a member of the council but has no vote or votes only in
case of a tie, the mayor is not deemed to be a member for the purpose of determining a four-
fifths majority vote.
(g) The resolution ordering the improvement may reduce, but not increase, the extent of the
improvement as stated in the notice of hearing.
Subd. 2.Approval by park board or utilities commission.
A resolution ordering a park improvement may be adopted only by a four-fifths vote of the
council and shall also be approved by the park board, if there is one; provided, that if the mayor
of the municipality is a member of the council but has no vote or votes only in case of a tie, the
mayor shall not be deemed to be a member for the purpose of determining such four-fifths
majority vote. A resolution ordering an improvement of the water, sewer, steam heating, street
lighting or other facility over which a utilities commission has jurisdiction shall also be approved
by the utilities commission.
Subd. 3.Petition by all owners.
Whenever all owners of real property abutting upon any street named as the location of any
improvement shall petition the council to construct the improvement and to assess the entire cost
against their property, the council may, without a public hearing, adopt a resolution determining
such fact and ordering the improvement. The validity of the resolution shall not be questioned by
any taxpayer or property owner or the municipality unless an action for that purpose is
commenced within 30 days after adoption of the resolution as provided in section 429.036.
Nothing herein prevents any property owner from questioning the amount or validity of the
special assessment against the owner's property pursuant to section 429.081. In the case of a
petition for the municipality to own and install a fire protection system, a pedestrian skyway
system, or on-site water contaminant improvements, the petition must contain or be accompanied
by an undertaking satisfactory to the city by the petitioner that the petitioner will grant the
municipality the necessary property interest in the building to permit the city to enter upon the
property and the building to construct, maintain, and operate the fire protection system,
pedestrian skyway system, or on-site water contaminant improvements. In the case of a petition
for the installation of a privately owned fire protection system, a privately owned pedestrian
skyway system, or privately owned on-site water contaminant improvements, the petition shall
contain the plans and specifications for the improvement, the estimated cost of the improvement
and a statement indicating whether the city or the owner will contract for the construction of the
improvement. If the owner is contracting for the construction of the improvement, the city shall
not approve the petition until it has reviewed and approved the plans, specifications, and cost
estimates contained in the petition. The construction cost financed under section 429.091 shall
not exceed the amount of the cost estimate contained in the petition. In the case of a petition for
the installation of a fire protection system, a pedestrian skyway system, or on-site water
contaminant improvements, the petitioner may request abandonment of the improvement at any
time after it has been ordered pursuant to subdivision 1 and before contracts have been awarded
for the construction of the improvement under section 429.041, subdivision 2. If such a request is
received, the city council shall abandon the proceedings but in such case the petitioner shall
reimburse the city for any and all expenses incurred by the city in connection with the
improvement.
475.58, Subd. 3b.Street reconstruction and bituminous overlays.
(a) A municipality may, without regard to the election requirement under subdivision 1,
issue and sell obligations for street reconstruction or bituminous overlays, if the following
conditions are met:
(1) the streets are reconstructed or overlaid under a street reconstruction or overlay plan that
describes the street reconstruction or overlay to be financed, the estimated costs, and any planned
reconstruction or overlay of other streets in the municipality over the next five years, and the
plan and issuance of the obligations has been approved by a vote of all of the members of the
governing body present at the meeting following a public hearing for which notice has been
published in the official newspaper at least ten days but not more than 28 days prior to the
hearing; and
(2) if a petition requesting a vote on the issuance is signed by voters equal to five percent of
the votes cast in the last municipal general election and is filed with the municipal clerk within
30 days of the public hearing, the municipality may issue the bonds only after obtaining the
approval of a majority of the voters voting on the question of the issuance of the obligations. If
the municipality elects not to submit the question to the voters, the municipality shall not propose
the issuance of bonds under this section for the same purpose and in the same amount for a
period of 365 days from the date of receipt of the petition. If the question of issuing the bonds is
submitted and not approved by the voters, the provisions of section 475.58, subdivision 1a, shall
apply.
(b) Obligations issued under this subdivision are subject to the debt limit of the municipality
and are not excluded from net debt under section 475.51, subdivision 4.
(c) For purposes of this subdivision, street reconstruction and bituminous overlays includes
utility replacement and relocation and other activities incidental to the street reconstruction, turn
lanes and other improvements having a substantial public safety function, realignments, other
modifications to intersect with state and county roads, and the local share of state and county
road projects. For purposes of this subdivision, "street reconstruction" includes expenditures for
street reconstruction that have been incurred by a municipality before approval of a street
reconstruction plan, if such expenditures are included in a street reconstruction plan approved on
or before the date of the public hearing under paragraph (a), clause (1), regarding issuance of
bonds for such expenditures.
(d) Except in the case of turn lanes, safety improvements, realignments, intersection
modifications, and the local share of state and county road projects, street reconstruction and
bituminous overlays does not include the portion of project cost allocable to widening a street or
adding curbs and gutters where none previously existed.
475.58 Subd. 1a.Resubmission limitation.
If the electors do not approve the issuing of obligations at an election required by
subdivision 1, the question of authorizing the obligations for the same purpose and in the same
amount may not be submitted to the electors within a period of 180 days from the date the
election was held. If the question of authorizing the obligations for the same purpose and in the
same amount is not approved a second time it may not be submitted to the electors within a
period of one year after the second election.
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Street Reconstruction Plan
City of Lino Lakes
February 24, 2014
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Review of Existing Pavement Information
III. Types of Street Maintenance
IV. Proposed Street Reconstruction Program
V. Estimated Costs
VI. Summary and Recommendations
Appendix A – Street Rating Summary
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
I. Executive Summary
The City of Lino Lakes currently has a Pavement Management Report that includes an inventory of the
City’s existing streets and provides recommendations for the ongoing maintenance of individual street
segments. The most recent report was updated in June of 2013. The report was created with the aid of
a software package called Cartegraph. Each year the City inspects 25% of our total street segments and
enters the ratings into this software.
Some of the existing pavement conditions have changed due to improvements the City has made over
the last several years. The City has been disciplined in budgeting money each year for sealcoating and
mill and overlay projects. These projects have allowed the City to improve the ratings on the streets that
hadn’t degraded to a point where sealcoating and mill and overlays would be ineffective. The locations
of these projects were determined by a number of factors including their OCI rating, geographic location
and budgetary constraints.
The City is now considering the development of a street reconstruction program for the annual
rehabilitation of the City’s roadway system. This study has been prepared to assist City staff and the City
Council with developing this program and creating a prioritized schedule for the reconstruction of the
City’s worst street segments and the determination of preliminary cost estimates for the recommended
improvements.
II. Review of Existing Pavement Information
The Pavement Management Report includes information for approximately 99 miles of existing roadway
within the City. The roadway system has been divided into 757 separate roadway segments and
condition ratings have been performed for each segment. Each year the City inspects 25% of the total
segments within the City. Therefore the entire roadway system is inspected over a four year period.
The Pavement Management Report includes a database inventory documenting historical information,
street conditions and recommended maintenance for each individual segment based on its OCI rating.
Using the OCI rating, the Pavement Management Report recommends four types of street
improvements including Sealcoating, Mill and Overlays, Reclamation, and Reconstruction. Definitions
for each of these types of improvements are included in Section III of this report. A summary of the
pavement condition ratings is included in Appendix A.
Engineering staff has established the following OCI categories to describe the conditions of the
roadways:
Adequate – Overall Condition Index (OCI) 70.01 – 100.00
Marginal – Overall Condition Index (OCI) 40.01 – 70.00
Problem – Overall Condition Index (OCI) 0.00 – 40.00
In addition to the OCI rating, other information was considered as part of this study. This information
included discussions with the City’s street maintenance personnel, a review of the general soil
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
conditions within the City and the need for utility repairs or improvements along the individual street
segments.
Some general assumptions were made regarding the existing soil conditions within the City. It was
assumed that the soils in the area south and east of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes are generally organic
with a high groundwater level. Soils north and west of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes were assumed to
be predominately sandy in nature. Past projects in various locations throughout the City have
confirmed these assumptions.
III. Types of Street Maintenance
For clarification, there are four different types of street maintenance that the City performs on our local
streets. They include Sealcoating, Mill & Overlays, Reclamation, and Reconstruction.
Sealcoating
Sealcoating includes pre-sweeping and filling of all cracks in the pavement. A layer of emulsified (liquid)
asphalt is applied uniformly across the pavement surface. This is followed by a uniform cover of trap
rock chips. Sealcoating creates a surface seal to the existing pavement, which provides additional
support for traffic loads, and protection from weather conditions. Sealcoating is recommended for
street segments that have an OCI rating of 70.01-100.
Mill & Overlays
Milling and overlaying is proposed in areas where the existing pavement is in moderate to poor
condition, but the underlying soils are in good condition. These streets typically have an OCI rating of
40.01 – 70. The milling and overlaying operation includes edge milling along the existing curb line and
overlaying the existing pavement with 1-1/2 inches of new bituminous. Partial replacement of the
existing curb may be included with a mill and overlay project.
Reclamation
Reclamation has been used in the portions of the City where the underlying soils are in good condition,
typically the north and west of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes. A number of the streets in these areas
were constructed originally with bituminous curb and gutter rather than concrete. For projects in these
areas the City has utilized the reclamation process. Reclamation includes reclaiming (grinding up) of the
existing asphalt and aggregate base materials for use as aggregate base for the asphalt pavement. Then
a new 2-inch base course and 1-1/2 inch wear course are paved over the aggregate. This may or may
not include new bituminous curb. The reclamation process is economical because it utilizes the existing
roadway materials. Reclamation is a potential option for pavements that have an OCI of 0 – 40 and are
located in the area north and west of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes. It also can only be used for street
segments where no utility improvements are required.
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Reconstruction
Reconstruction includes the complete removal and disposal of the existing bituminous pavement and
aggregate base course and the construction of new bituminous surface to meet City standards. City
standards include a 32-foot width (back of curb to back of curb) with concrete curb and gutter and
bituminous pavement. However, the City has allowed 28-foot width for street on rural streets or in
areas where the existing streets significantly narrower. These streets are reviewed on a case by case
basis.
It is assumed that reconstruction will included 5-inches of class 5, 2-inches of bituminous base course
and 1-1/2 inches of bituminous wear course. It also includes complete replacement of the concrete curb
and gutter. It is also assumed that some of the reconstruction work will require soil correction
improvements. Reconstruction is proposed for pavements that have an OCI rating of 0 – 40.
IV. Proposed Street Reconstruction Program
Based upon our review of the information provided in the Pavement Management Report and our
annual field investigations, we have developed a staged program for the reconstruction of the worst
street segments within the City. The street reconstruction program has been established considering
five separate project areas. The City may wish to increase or decrease the number of project areas that
are constructed per year depending upon the annual budget available for the street reconstruction
work. Project areas have been grouped by neighborhood and by project cost.
V. Estimate Costs
We have determined preliminary estimated construction costs for the street reconstruction program
based on the length of the street segments and the estimated cost per mile shown in the Pavement
Management Report which is $1,508,090 per mile.
Phase Streets Total Length (Feet) Estimated Cost
I
Hokah Dr, Rice Ct, Totem Tr, Arrowhead
Dr, Tomahawk Tr, Tomahawk Ct,
Chippewa Tr, Arrowhead Ct
10,535
$3,009,125
II West Shadow Lake Drive, Shadow Ct,
LaMotte Dr, LaMotte Circle
10,643 $3,040,015
III 81st St, Danube St, Elbe St, Red Maple Ln,
Holly Dr, Holly Ct
10,441 $,2,982,179
IV Oak Ln, Knoll Dr, Joyer Ln, Karth Rd, Talle
Ln, Canfield Rd, Gaage Ln
9,735 $2,780,598
V 77th St, Gordon Ave, Rehbein St, Peltier
Lake Dr, James St
11,229 $3,207,139
Total 52,583 $15,019,056
The estimated costs detailed above do not include any replacement or installation of watermain or
sanitary sewer. If the residents in any of these neighborhoods would like to have sanitary sewer or
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
watermain installed as part of a street reconstruction project they will need to petition the City for these
improvements and agree to be assessed 100% of the cost. The estimated costs included as part of this
study are intended to be preliminary in nature to assist the City in establishing a financing plan for the
street reconstruction program. If the street reconstruction program proceeds, it is recommended that a
more detailed feasibility study be prepared to more accurately determine the proposed improvements
and estimated cost for each project area. It should also be noted that the project phasing shown above
does not include a proposed schedule. The City’s Pavement Management Report indicated that the City
would need to spend $2,000,000 per year to maintain an average OCI rating of 66.95.
The proposed schedule for the replacement of the streets shown in the table above is based on a
combination of two rankings. First, each neighborhood was ranked by their weighted OCI. The OCI for
each street segment was multiplied by its length. The product for all of the segments were then totaled
and then divided by the total neighborhood length to determine the weighted OCI. The results were as
follows:
Rank Neighborhood OCI
1 Colonial Woods 0.00
2 West Shadow Lake Drive 1.87
3 LaMotte 4.77
4 Shenendoah 6.58
5 Rehbein’s Peltier View 9.57
6 Holly 26.59
7 Lakeview Woodlands 29.00
8 Joyer/Karth/Talle/Canfield/Gaage 33.96
9 Sunset Estates 38.19
10 Pine Haven 49.50
The second ranking was based on the cost per ADT for each neighborhood. The total cost was divided
by the number of vehicle trips that travel those streets per day. The results were as follows:
Rank Neighborhood Cost per ADT
1 Holly $1,523.67
2 Shenendoah $1,681.08
3 LaMotte $1,804.38
4 Pine Haven $2,440.17
5 Colonial Woods $3,020.15
6 Lakeview Woodlands $3,597.21
7 West Shadow Lake Drive $3,633.26
8 Joyer/Karth/Talle/Canfield/Gaage $4,157.82
9 Sunset Estates $4,193.27
10 Rehbein’s Peltier View $6,138.45
Staff determined that a balanced analysis would be to utilize both rankings when determining the order
in which streets would get replaced. The first ranking is an indication of condition of the street and the
second ranking identifies how many trips would benefit from the improvements. If we average the two
rankings together the results are as follows:
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Rank Neighborhood Average Ranking
1 Shenendoah 3
2 LaMotte 3
3 Colonial Woods 3
4 Holly 3.5
5 West Shadow Lake Drive 4.5
6 Lakeview Woodlands 6.5
7 Pine Haven 7
8 Rehbein’s Peltier View 7.5
9 Joyer/Karth/Talle/Canfield/Gaage 8
10 Sunset Estates 9
This order of street replacement is generally followed in the schedule shown above. However, in order
to provide a consistent cost per phase, some neighborhoods were combined and may be slightly out of
order.
VII. Summary and Recommendation
This study has included a review of the City’s existing Pavement Management Report dated June 2013,
field reviews and preliminary cost estimating to assist the City with the establishment of a street
reconstruction program. All available information was reviewed and considered in determining
recommendations for the street reconstruction program.
It is recommended that the City establish a street reconstruction program to include the street
segments and improvement recommendations detailed in this report. The street reconstruction
program would become an important part of the City’s management of its existing infrastructure. The
ongoing maintenance of the City’s roadway system is important to minimize future roadway
reconstruction costs.
If the city wishes to proceed with the establishment of a street reconstruction program, we recommend
the following:
1. A financing plan is established for the funding of the annual street reconstruction program.
Based upon the annual budget available, the number of street segments included as part of
each project area may need to be increased or decreased.
2. Once a financing plan is developed, it is recommended that a more detailed feasibility report be
prepared to determine the proposed improvements and estimated costs for the first project
area of the street reconstruction program.
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
APPENDIX A
Street Rating Summary
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
64th Street 20th Ave to Sac 23.03 0 373.3
Lamotte Circle Lamotte Drive to Sac 24.55 0 825.63
Foxtail Drive Foxtail Ct to Woodchuck Cir 36.72 0 581.42
Gordon Avenue N Rehbeins St to 77th St E 36.62 0 452.92
Hokah Drive Bubble Sac (Hokah Dr) 27.08 0 152.78
Hokah Drive Totem Tr to Bubble Sac 31.96 0 473.43
Hokah Drive #6631 to Sac 31 0 475.65
Hokah Drive Bubble Sac to Birch St 30.47 0 664.89
Hokah Drive #6557 to #6631 15.2 0 868.54
64th Street Otter Lake Road to Sac 33.58 0 708.41
Lamotte Drive Lamotte Circle to Sac 24.55 0 281.22
Pheasant Run S Birch St to Sac 10 0 505.22
Phelps Road Service Rd to Arnt Construction 36.78 0 1317.58
Red Maple Lane Red Maple Lane split to #6280 26.76 0 1105.31
Rondeau Lake Road E 81st St E to 1682' N 31.7 0 1682.02
Rondeau Lake Road E Main St to 3088' East 25.58 0 3088.24
Rondeau Lake Road E 81st St to 3088' East 37.3 0 1505.11
Rondeau Lake Road
W #8399 to #8317 34.3 0 1196.57
Rondeau Lake Road
W #8317 to 2602 N of 81st W 19.88 0 1966.13
Rondeau Lake Road
W 81st St W to 2602' N 29.98 0 2602.66
Rondeau Lake Road
W Main St to 81st St W 35.28 0 1349.3
Sandpiper Drive Shadow Lake Dr W to Sac 30.64 0 343.71
Shadow Court Shadow Lake Dr W to Sac 33.14 0 281.94
Shadow Lake Drive W Birch St to3353' N of Birch St 27.8 0 3353.12
81st Street W Rondeau Lake Rd W to Sac 26.23 0 1034.25
Shadow Lake Drive W 3353' N of Birch St to Shadow Ct 26.6 0 3327.36
Old Birch Street Birch St to Birch St 26.84 0 2262.85
Arrowhead Drive Totem Trail to 550' East 34 0 550
Arrowhead Drive Ware Rd to Totem Trl 33.05 0 779.52
Lamotte Drive Lamotte Circle to City Limits 35.64 0 986.9
Rondeau Lake Road E 1682' N of 81st St. E. to N city limits 37.79 0.52 2451.03
Peltier Lake Drive Old Mill Road to #7600 37.83 0.63 2901.63
Talle Lane Canfield Rd to Karth Rd 38.54 0.72 1129.55
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Orange Street Dead end to Eva St 3.52 2.64 814.1
Main St 38.63 3.01 623.84
Woodland Drive Main St to Sac 38.63 3.01 1363.65
Red Maple Lane #6280 to Red Maple Lane split 38.9 3.74 1529.65
Peltier Lake Drive #7600 to 77th St E 38.88 3.79 655.88
4th Avenue Main St to Andall St 4.93 4.05 3837.72
4th Avenue Andall St to Pine St 5 4.12 1363.48
Holly Drive E 12th Avenue to East End 38.8 7.24 710
Holly Court E Holly Dr N to Sac 40.7 7.28 1603.86
Evergreen Trail #980 to #1004 9.94 9.25 502.72
Marvy Street Leonard Ave to Jon Ave 10.62 9.93 1936.98
Carl Street 4th Avenue to #346 11.07 10.38 1312.48
Rehbein Street Gordon Ave N to 20th Ave N 41.34 10.49 2080.78
Diane Court West Sac to Diane St 11.7 11.01 46
Canfield Road Gaage Lane to Talle Lane 41.92 11.08 562.41
Evergreen Trail #1004 to Sac 13.06 12.37 1135.21
Tomahawk Trail Chippewa Tr to Arrowhead Dr 42.82 12.45 344.01
Karth Road Talle Lane to Joyer Lane 43.89 15.41 1220.16
Gaage Lane Birch St to Canfield Rd 43.93 15.52 831.47
Tomahawk Trail Birch St to Tomahawk Ct 44 15.64 533.61
Arrowhead Court Arrowhead Dr to Sac 44.27 16.38 217.24
Jon Avenue Marvy St to 74th St 18 17.31 658.77
Totem Trail Hokah Dr to Rice Ct 44.18 17.76 325.72
Shadow Lake Drive W Shadow Ct to Sandpiper Dr 44.4 18.31 846.5
Hokah Drive Birch St to #6557 44.46 18.45 806.56
Arrowhead Drive
550' East of Totem Trail to Tomahawk
Trail 43.87 20.05 589.86
Nordin Street 21.94 21.36 221.45
Red Maple Lane 62nd St to Red Maple Lane split 46.06 22.1 431.47
Rice Court Totem Tr to Sac 46.07 22.17 404.08
Oak Lane Knoll Dr to Sac 22.92 22.32 2018.26
Shadow Lake Drive W Sandpiper Dr to Dead End 46.36 22.84 433.94
Chippewa Trail Tomahawk Trl to Arrowhead Dr 46.98 22.91 759.05
Evergreen Trail Lake Dr Ne to #980 23.62 23.04 884.24
Gordon Avenue N Sac to Rehbeins St 46.5 23.19 224.41
Olive Street Eva St to West Sac 25.26 24.68 799.32
Arrowhead Drive Arrowhead Court to Chippewa Trl 47.32 25.26 535.75
Joyer Lane Karth Rd to Birch St 47.85 25.64 1971.86
Tomahawk Court Tomahawk Tr to Sac 47.95 27.25 250.7
Totem Trail Rice Ct to Birch St 48 27.36 541.86
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Tomahawk Trail Tomahawk Ct to Chippewa Tr 48.68 27.87 291.52
Arrowhead Drive Tomahawk Trl to Arrowhead Ct 48.9 28.35 457.4
Karth Road Talle Lane to Sac 49.05 28.72 454.09
Totem Trail Arrowhead Dr to Hokah Dr 48.66 28.79 282.02
Diane Court Diane St to East Sac 29.62 29.21 213.71
77th Street E Gordon Avenue N to 20th Ave N 48.86 29.24 2086.95
Rondeau Lake Road
W #8399 to City Limits 49.7 31.03 582.08
Chippewa Trail Arrowhead Dr to Birchwood Acres 50.69 33.15 231.11
Foxtail Court Sac to Foxtail Dr 50.8 33.42 801.1
Bloom Court 20th Ave S to Sac 44.6 33.74 471.38
Olive Street Eva St to East Sac 34.34 34.04 497.92
Rice Lake Court Rice Lake Ln to Sac 52 35.43 528.29
Danube Street Sac to 81st St W 37.17 36.87 502.41
Knoll Drive Lois Lane to Oak Lane 37.28 36.97 1018.81
Rolling Hills Drive Deer Pass Tr to North Dead End 47 37.63 202.9
Marvy Street Sunset Ave to Leonard Ave 37.99 37.69 612.67
Diane Street #8107 to Diane Ct 38.1 37.8 1548.05
Woodchuck Circle Sac to Woodchuck Cir 53.51 37.8 420.36
77th Street E Peltier Lake Dr to Gordon Ave N 53.62 37.99 623.83
Bald Eagle Boulevard Partridge Court to Woodchuck Circle 51.58 39.1 377.7
Lamotte Drive County Rd J to Lamotte Cir 55.27 39.85 306.84
Rice Lake Lane Rice Lake Ct to Elm St 54.89 39.92 1768.77
Barbara Lane Marilyn Dr to Sac 40.36 40.07 542.71
James Street Lake Dr NE to #980 40.94 40.65 2202.17
Woodchuck Circle Woodchuck Ct to Foxtail Dr 55.41 40.68 574.03
Rice Lake Drive Ulmer Dr to Elm St 56.23 41.93 1775.14
Oak Lane Carole Dr to Knoll Drive 42.26 41.97 1748.75
Woodchuck Circle Bald Eagle Blvd W to Woodchuck Ct 56.33 42.06 758.7
Cedar Street E Clearwater Creek Dr to Otter Lake Rd 58 43.8 654
Maple Street Lake Dr NE to Sac 45.37 45.12 926.16
77th Street W Carole Dr to Sac 46.05 45.79 1256.01
Foxtail Drive Ash St to foxtail Ct 59.72 46.69 959.07
12th Avenue S Birch St to Buckthorn Lane 50 47.03 783.53
Sargent Court N Ash St to Sac 60.22 47.27 910.92
12th Avenue S Buckthorn Ln to White Oak Rd 50.8 47.37 337.87
Partridge Court Partridge Ct to Sac 61.39 48.02 448.75
12th Avenue S Peregrine Circle to Holly Dr E 51.6 48.33 309.75
81st Street W Lake Dr NE to Danube St 49.06 48.87 414.95
Holly Drive E Holly Court to County Road J 63.17 49.55 3463.97
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Orange Street Eva St to Lake Dr NE 50.19 50 1017.34
Holly Drive E County Rd 21 to West End 64.19 50.82 3821.43
Terra Court Apollo Dr to Sac 51.69 51.5 365.9
4th Avenue Lilac St to Thomas St 51.75 51.56 1333.92
81st Street W Danube St to Elbe St NE 52.89 52.7 348.44
Woodchuck Circle Foxtail Dr to Bald Eagle Blvd W 66.78 53 836.13
12th Avenue S White Oak Rd to Peregrine Cir 56.2 53.07 1197.55
Nancy Drive Vicky Ln to 79th St 53.26 53.07 1156.26
Glenview Drive Sunrise Ave to Lakeview Dr. 68.71 54.79 1298.3
Diane Street #8107 to Lake Dr 55.28 55.09 510.87
Sherman Lake Road Merganser Ct to Sherman Lake Ct 58.35 55.19 458.41
Bald Eagle Boulevard City Limits to Rolling Hills Drive 67.19 56.15 1144
Bald Eagle Boulevard
North End of Woodchuck Circle to
South End of Woodchuck Circle 67.66 56.58 1422.3
Linda Avenue Hodgson Rd to Linda Ct 71.9 57.23 179.32
Bald Eagle Boulevard Rolling Hills Drive to Partridge Court 68.54 57.4 1147.79
Baldwin Lake Road County Road J to Woodridge Ln 71.84 58.06 1786
Elbe Street NE Main St to 81st St W 58.4 58.21 864.09
Lakeview Drive Elm St to Fairmont 73.74 58.61 1312.92
Birch Court Birch St to Sac 74.48 58.72 128.65
Bald Eagle Boulevard
South End of Woodchuck Circle to
South City Limits 71.07 59.37 643.2
Gladstone Drive Sunset Ave to Lakeview Dr 75.2 59.71 643.34
Lakeview Drive Fairmont to Gladstone 75.2 59.71 1310.07
Lakeview Drive Gladstone to Glenview 75.2 59.71 1341.62
Lakeview Drive Glenview to North Rd 75.2 59.71 1321.52
Fairmont Drive Sunrise Dr to Lakeview Dr 75.2 59.71 603.96
Fairmont Drive Lakeview Dr to Sunset Ave 75.2 59.71 620.08
Glenview Drive Lakeview Dr. to Sunset Ave. 75.8 60.89 1298.3
81st Street E East rondeau Lake Rd. to Dead End 77.6 61.46 1252.53
77th Street W Country Lane to Sac 61.98 61.79 594.95
Elbe Street NE 81st St W to Sac 62.25 62.01 176.81
Thomas Street 4th Ave. to Dead End 62.36 62.12 1349.82
Eva Street Olive St to Orange St 63.12 62.88 325.3
Meadow Court Apollo Dr to Sac 63.36 63.12 585.34
Ulmer Drive Rice lake Dr to Rice Lake Ct 80.3 63.57 643.14
Gladstone Drive Lakeview Dr to Sunrise Dr 80.62 63.84 619.1
Heather Court N Apollo Dr to Sac 64.6 64.36 477.66
Service Road Phelps Road to North Sac 83 65.82 1702.98
Hawthorn Road Red Hawk Tr to Lonesome Pine Tr 69.05 66.02 1981.43
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Cedar Street E #2310 to Clearwater Creek Dr 84 66.04 712
Aqua Circle Aqua Lane to Aqua Lane 93.9 66.05 2392
Oakwood Drive Rohavic Ln to Sac 69.75 66.27 570.25
4th Avenue Thomas St to Sherwood Ln 66.72 66.52 1283.15
4th Avenue 479' N of Apollo to Lilac St 66.92 66.72 1327
Lea Court Apollo Dr to Sac 67.08 66.88 360.56
Aqua Lane Aqua Cir East to Park Property 83.42 66.99 534.19
Sherman Lake Road Timberwolf Tr to Pondview Cir 71 67.17 481.81
4th Avenue Sherwood Ln to Main St 67.4 67.2 2661.12
Linda Circle Linda Ln to Sac 85.4 67.32 204.02
Service Road Otter Lake Road to Phelps 85.76 67.55 1360.61
2nd Avenue Sunflower Ln to Smoketree Ln 71.73 68.32 318.29
Linda Lane Linda Ave to Sac 87.5 68.51 300.34
Elmcrest Avenue 65 St to Tart Lake Road 100 68.71 621.9
Sunrise Drive Rustic Ln to Cul de sac at cty 10 73.6 69.33 586.04
Linda Court Linda Lane to Sac 89 69.4 471.93
Black Duck Drive S Tamarack Ln to Birch St 73.78 69.65 408.25
Elm Street Lake Dr to 4th Ave 89.4 69.68 455.47
2nd Avenue 1860Green Briar Dr to Ulmer Dr 73.32 69.76 327.88
Aqua Lane Aqua Cir West to Aqua Cir East 88 69.82 303.17
2nd Avenue Red Clover Ln to Green Briar Dr 73.5 69.94 333.44
Bluebill Lane Main St to Sac 70.24 69.99 877.65
Linda Lane Linda Ct to Linda Cir 90.5 70.53 1038.94
Lacasse Drive Tele Ln to Otter Lake Rd 91.34 70.64 200.94
Sunrise Drive Gladstone Dr to Glenview Dr 75.2 70.65 1317.04
Sunrise Road Glenview Dr to Rustic Ln 75.2 70.65 505.07
Elm Street 4th Ave to Cinnamon Teal Court 91 70.95 405.74
Elm Street Cinnamon Teal Ct to Gray Heron Dr 91 70.95 359.04
Rustic Lane Glenview Dr to Sunrise Dr 75.2 71.4 784.51
Delina Circle Clearwater Creek Dr to Sac 92.8 71.57 213.15
Laurene Avenue Schlavin Ct to White Pine Rd 76.48 71.59 469.81
Ulmer Drive 2nd Ave to Rice Lake Dr 91.8 71.59 374.66
Pelican Place Egret Lane to Egret Lane 75.73 71.63 549.42
Hawthorn Road Ware Rd to Red Hawk Tr 75.95 71.83 383.2
Glenview Drive Sunrise Dr to Rustic Lane 76 72.1 475.3
Pheasant Hills Drive Birch St to Broken Oak Ct 77 72.12 360.8
Ellen Court Lacasse Dr to Sac 94 72.17 201.51
77th Street W Marilyn Dr to Country Ln 72.6 72.34 747.25
Lacasse Court Lacasse Dr to W Sac 94.5 72.42 236.65
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Laurene Avenue Linda Ave to Sac 77.46 72.48 795.64
Lacasse Drive Clearwater Creek Dr to Lacasse Ct 94.7 72.52 764.35
Glen Circle Glen Trail S to Sac 93.9 72.68 263.6
2nd Avenue Elm St to Sunflower Ln 76.71 72.72 483.67
Lacasse Drive Lacasse Cir to Tele Ln 95.2 72.77 418.4
Clearwater Creek
Drive Lacasse Dr to Tele Dr 95.4 72.87 679.16
Rohavic Lane Hodgson Rd to Oakwood Dr 78.4 73.01 477.35
Lacasse Drive Lacasse Ct to Ellen Court 95.8 73.07 501.75
Town Center Parkway Village Dr to City Hall Entrance 94.8 73.15 639.6
Clearwater Creek
Circle Sac to Clearwater Creek Dr 96 73.17 213.72
Clearwater Creek
Drive Cedar St E to Clearwater Creek Ct 96.02 73.18 223.64
Tart Court Tart lake Rd to Sac 96.14 73.2 311.35
Clearwater Creek
Drive Tele Dr to Clearwater Creek Cir 96.8 73.57 350.46
Rolling Hills Drive Reiling Rd to Deer Pass Tr 79 73.59 551.11
Tart Lake Road Tart Ct to 24th Ave 96.98 73.62 231.57
Trappers Xing N Trappers Ct to Sac 97 73.65 396.68
Lacasse Court Lacasse Dr to E Sac 97 73.67 275.07
Aqua Lane Lake Dr to Aqua Cir West 93.9 73.77 448.52
Tele Drive Tele Ln to Clearwater Creek Dr 97.2 73.77 630.87
Country Lakes Drive Deerwood Lane to Sac 97.3 73.79 221.95
Hollow Lane South Glen Tr to Sac 96.2 73.83 656.85
Linda Lane Linda Cir to Linda Ave 96.21 73.84 331.96
Sherman Lake Road Birch St to Merganser Ct 79.46 73.9 1077.87
Country Lakes Drive Fawn Lane to W end 97.6 73.94 160.19
Trappers Court Trappers Xing N to Sac 97.6 73.95 327.13
Lacasse Drive Clearwater Creek Dr to Lacasse Cir 97.6 73.97 531.87
Lacasse Circle Lacasse Dr to Sac 97.6 73.97 244.04
Villiage Drive
Town Center Pkwy to North End of
Allina Medical Center 96.54 74.02 791.85
Hollow Lane South glen Tr to 62nd Ave N 96.6 74.03 473.14
Town Center Parkway Lake Dr to Village Dr 96.6 74.05 344.69
Clearwater Creek
Drive Clearwater Creek Cir to Tart Lake Rd 97.8 74.07 735.8
Tele Lane Tele Dr to Sac 97.8 74.07 355
Fawn Lane Birch St to Country Lakes Dr 97.9 74.09 473.24
Linda Avenue Linda Lane to Ware Rd 96.8 74.13 379.91
Deerwood Lane Country Lakes Dr to Birch St 98 74.14 1241.63
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Clearwater Creek
Drive Clearwater Creek Ct to Arthur Ct 97.96 74.15 438.88
Red Hawk Trail Hawthorn Rd to Lonesome Pine Tr 78.71 74.19 267.34
Country Lakes Drive Fawn Lane to Deeerwood Ln 97.2 74.33 1410.53
South Glen Trail 62nd Ave to Bubble Sac 97.2 74.33 501.94
Trappers Xing N 98.4 74.35 113.7
Trappers Xing N Holly Dr to Trappers Ct 98.4 74.35 794.75
Albert Court Tart Lake Rd to Sac 98.4 74.37 246.98
Arthur Court Clearwater Crk Dr to Sac 98.4 74.37 548.51
Clearwater Creek
Drive Arthur Ct to Lacasse Dr 98.5 74.42 936.05
Hawthorn Road Lonesome Pine Tr to Painted Turtle Rd 79 74.42 595.49
Tart Lake Road Stella Ln to Tart Ct 98.76 74.51 614.94
Clearwater Creek
Court Clearwater Creek Dr to Sac 98.8 74.57 407.74
Tele Lane Lacasse Dr to Tele Dr 98.8 74.57 377.34
South Glen Trail Bubble Sac to Glen Cir 97.8 74.63 360.14
South Glen Trail Hollow Ln to Glen Circle 97.8 74.63 518.93
Lacasse Drive Ellen Ct to Iverson Ct 99 74.67 411.23
Shadow Lake Drive W Fox Road to 62nd Ave N 99 74.78 1578.15
2nd Avenue Smoketree Ln to Red Clover Ln 79.33 74.93 343.35
Tart Lake Road Clearwater Creek Dr to Lacasse Dr 99.6 74.93 335.45
Tart Lake Road Langer Ln to Albert Ct 99.72 74.99 175.96
Tart Lake Road Lacasse Dr to Stella Ln 99.76 75.01 892.46
65th Street Stella Ln to 24th Ave 100 75.13 769.12
Coyote Court Coyote Trl to Sac 80 75.13 335.28
Tart Lake Road Albert Ct to Clearwater Creek Dr 100 75.13 325.05
Tart Lake Road Otter Lake Rd to Langer Ln 100 75.13 671.81
Elm Street Snow Owl Ln to Rice Lake Dr 98.8 75.15 486.34
Elm Street 2nd Ave to Rice Lake Dr 98.8 75.15 361.3
Lacasse Drive Iverson Court to Tart Lake Rd 99.96 75.15 581.21
Clearwater Creek
Drive Tart Lake Rd to Delina Cir 100 75.17 1224.04
Flora Court Langer Lane to Sac 100 75.17 349.98
Iverson Court Lacasse Dr to Sac 100 75.17 602.81
Langer Lane Tart Lake Rd to Flora Ct 100 75.17 1712.3
Langer Lane Flora Court to Langer Circle 100 75.17 453.86
Stella Lane 65th Street to Tart Lake Road 96.8 75.22 315
Timberwolf Trail Birch St to Pheasant Hills Dr 81.23 75.29 260.05
South Glen Trail Hollow Ln to Sac 99.2 75.33 134.39
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Elm Street Sunrise Dr to Lakeview 99.2 75.35 595.49
Prairie Flower Road Shadow Lake Dr W to Chippewa Tr 80.8 75.47 573.47
Elm Street Gray Heron Dr to Whipporwill Ln 99.6 75.55 339.51
Elm Street Whipporwill Ln to Snow Owl Ln 99.6 75.55 342.95
Northern Lights
Boulevard 21st Avenue to East Dead End 100 75.75 488.61
Elm Street Rice Lake Dr to Rice Lake Dr 100 75.75 591.83
Elm Street Mourning Dove to 2nd 100 75.75 973.81
Elm Street Mourning Dove to Sunrise Dr 100 75.75 340.05
Elm Street Lakeview to Sunset Rd 100 75.75 1070
21st Avenue S Main St to Northern Lights Blvd 100 75.75 385.74
21st Avenue S Northern Lights Blvd to 215' S 100 75.75 215
Oakwood Lane Woodridge Lane to Sac 83.1 75.83 529.94
Langer Circle Langer Lane to Sac 98.24 75.94 185
Stella Lane Stella Circle to Clearwater Creek Drive 98.48 76.06 341
Chippewa Trail
Shenandoah Addition to Prairie Flower
Dr. 85 76.12 225
Marshan Court MARSHAN LANE TO SAC 100 76.13 142
Woodridge Court Woodridge Ln to Sac 83.6 76.13 262.11
62nd Avenue South Glen Trl to Hollow Ln 100 76.13 960.94
62nd Avenue Ware Road to South Glen Trl 100 76.13 617.37
62nd Avenue N Shadow Lk Dr W to Red Maple Ln 100 76.13 434.73
62nd Avenue N Hollow Ln to Shadow Lake Dr W 100 76.13 2283.75
Holly Drive E Cassiopeia Ct to Trappers Xing N 100 76.13 449.41
Holly Drive E Trappers Xing N to Trappers Xing S 100 76.13 244.96
Holly Drive E 12th Ave to Royal Pines Pl 100 76.13 371.5
Holly Drive E
Royal Pines Pl to South Trappers
Crossing 100 76.13 255.04
Holly Drive E Cassiopeia Ct to Trappers Xing S 100 76.13 582.99
Holly Drive E Trappers Xing S to Cripple Creek Pass 100 76.13 759.85
Holly Drive E Holly Court to Cripple Creek Pass 100 76.13 899.25
Clearwater Creek
Drive Stella Lane to Delina Cir 98.76 76.2 744
Lonesome Pine Trail Linden Ln to Coyote Tr 81.58 76.25 861.99
77th Street W Lake Dr NE to Marilyn Dr 76.64 76.38 492.27
Hunters Ridge Timberwolf Tr to Timberwolf Tr 100 76.47 983.23
Arrowhead Drive Hodgson Road to Lakota Trail 100 76.47 276
Lakota Trail Arrowhead Drive to 198' North 100 76.47 198
Laurene Avenue White Pine Rd to Linda Ave 84.89 76.47 285.07
Laurene Avenue Rohavic Lane to Schlavin Ct 88.71 76.47 558.16
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Linda Avenue Laurene Ave to Hodgson Rd 87.5 76.47 935.44
Red Birch Court Birch St to Sac 96.2 76.47 575.19
Rohavic Lane Oakwood Dr to Laurene Ave 88.04 76.47 445.45
Schlavin Court Laurene Ave to Sac 86.03 76.47 478.18
Shadow Lake Court E Birch St to Sac 93.4 76.47 407.5
Teal Court Sherman lake Rd to Sac 98 76.47 649.85
Timberwolf Trail Wolf Cir to Sac 100 76.47 268.49
Timberwolf Trail Hunters Rdg to Sherman Lake Rd 94.6 76.47 585.73
Timberwolf Trail Hunters Ridge to Hunters Rdg 100 76.47 900.03
Timberwolf Trail Hunters Ridge to Wolf Cir 98.6 76.47 461.78
White Birch Court Birch St to Sac 97.8 76.47 578.29
White Pine Circle White Pine Rd to Sac 95 76.47 208.48
White Pine Road Oakwood Ln to Laurene Ave 91.58 76.47 1216.94
White Pine Road White Pine Cir to Oakwood Ln 90 76.47 576.51
White Pine Road Baldwin Lake Rd to White Pine Cir 96.64 76.47 907.32
Wolf Circle Timberwolf Tr to Sac 100 76.47 310.25
Woodridge Lane Woodridge Ct to Ash St 89.6 76.47 1058.86
Woodridge Lane Baldwin Lake Rd to Oakwood Ln 90.32 76.47 1378.79
Woodridge Lane Oakwood Ln to Woodridge Ct 85.4 76.47 1442.32
Oakwood Lane Woodridge Ln to White Pine Rd 97 76.47 586.89
Langer Lane Hartford Circle to August Circle 100 76.49 197
Killdeer Court Killdeer Dr to Sac 82.4 76.7 155.02
Langer Lane Langer Circle to Hartford Circle 100 76.82 460
Langer Lane August Circle to Stella Circle 100 76.82 713
Hartford Circle Langer Lane to Sac 100 76.82 196
August Circle Langer Lane to Sac 100 76.82 182
Stella Circle Langer Lane to Sac 100 76.82 137
Stella Lane Clearwater Creek Drive to 65th Street 100 76.82 530
Sherman Lake Road Birch Street to Sedge Court 100 76.84 280.3
Sherman Lake Road Stoneybrook Drive to Temp Sac 100 76.84 474.79
Sedge Court Sherman Lake Road to Sac 100 76.84 353.28
Stoneybrook Drive
Sherman Lake Road to Pheasant Hills
Drive 100 76.84 369.69
Stoneybrook Drive
Pheasant Hills Drive to South Temp
Sac 100 76.84 1609.07
Pheasant Hills Drive Birch Street to Oak View Court 100 76.84 1149
Oakview Court Pheasant Hills Drive to Sac 100 76.84 308.55
Pheasant Hills Drive Stoneybrook Drive to Goldenrod Circle 100 76.84 985
Goldenrod Circle Pheasant Hills Drive to Sac 100 76.84 264.75
Meadowview Court Pheasant Hills Drive to Sac 100 76.84 249.74
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Molitor Drive Centerville Road to East Sac 100 76.84 790
Pheasant Hills Drive Oak View Court to Stoneybrook Drive 100 76.84 278.61
Pheasant Hills Drive
Goldenrod Circle to Meadowview
Court 100 76.84 447
Pheasant Hills Drive
Meadowview Court to South
Stoneybrook Drive Sac 100 76.84 416.04
Sherman Lake Road Sedge Court to Stoneybrook Drive 100 76.84 722.1
Marshan Lane Lake Dr to Sac 96.8 76.88 937.69
Lonesome Pine Trail Bubble Sac to Linden Lane 82.44 76.95 523.07
Lonesome Pine Trail Coyote Tr to Red Hawk Tr 82.44 76.95 586.24
Antelope Drive Gladstone Dr to Wildflower Dr 82.18 77.06 483.83
Egret Lane Blue Heron Dr to Sac 82.6 77.13 183.77
Otter Lake Drive Sac to Otter Lake Road 83.8 77.19 1350.35
Baldwin Lake Road Woodridge Ln to White Pine Rd 94.5 77.29 557.36
Sandhill Drive Blue Heron Dr to Sac 82.8 77.32 891.47
Linda Lane Raven's Hollow to Oak Hollow Lane 95.8 77.34 376
Gladstone Drive Sunrise Dr to Antelope Dr 82.54 77.35 383.23
Antelope Drive Green Briar Dr to Green Briar Dr 82.58 77.38 153.19
Ruffed Grouse Road Ruffed Grouse Ct to Sac 83.6 77.47 630.7
Lantern Lane Lantern Cir to East Shadow Lake Dr E 81.92 77.64 555.84
Shadow Lake Drive W Birch St to Hickory Pl 84.8 77.72 206.33
Mourning Dove Road Smoketree Lane to Sac 83 77.72 268.32
Sunrise Drive Smoketree Ln to Fairmont Dr 96 77.87 451.15
Sunrise Drive Green Briar Dr to Gladstone Dr 89 77.87 1002.59
Sunrise Road Fairmont Dr to Green Briar Dr 87.1 77.87 316.38
Sunrise Road Elm St to Smoketree Ln 91.6 77.87 864.64
Osprey Court Sherman Lake Rd to Sac 100 77.87 522.81
2nd Avenue Wildflower Dr to Gladstone Cir 83.19 77.88 338.22
Rolling Hills Drive Bald Eagle Blvd W to Reiling Rd 85.4 78.07 1650.25
4th Avenue Apollo Dr to 479' N 78.53 78.25 479.09
Shadow Lake Drive W Painted Turtle Rd to River Birch Pl 86 78.38 330.6
Forsham Lake Drive Lake Dr to Stagecoach Trl 84 78.43 678.22
Cherokee Trail Hudson Trail to Cul-de-sac 98.92 78.46 324.38
Osprey Court 96 78.46 122.09
Trappers Crossing S 98.48 78.46 155.6
Cassiopeia Court Holly Drive E to Cul-de-sac 99.6 78.46 360.15
Cherokee Trail Hudson Trail to Trappers Xing S 98.92 78.46 514.12
Cripple Creek Court Cripple Creek Pass to Cul-de-sac 99.6 78.46 345.49
Cripple Creek Pass
Cripple Creek Ct to South Trappers
Xing 98.4 78.46 558.24
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Cripple Creek Pass Holly Dr N to Cripple Creek Ct 100 78.46 278.03
Durango Point Trappers Xing S to Cul-de-sac 99.48 78.46 474.86
Hawk Ridge Circle Pheasant Hills Drive to Cul-de-sac 98.8 78.46 163.19
Peregrine Circle 12th Avenue S to Cul-de-sac 100 78.46 345.86
Pheasant Hills Circle Pheasant Hills Drive to Cul-de-sac 89.3 78.46 144.79
Sherman Lake Road Teal Ct to Meadowlark Ct 100 78.46 491.85
Sherman Lake Road Meadowlark Ct to Osprey Ct 96 78.46 1585.58
Sherman Lake Road Osprey Court to Sherman Lake Circle 98.8 78.46 515.82
Trappers Crossing S Holly Drive to Mineral Point 100 78.46 276.03
Trappers Crossing S Cherokee Tr to Durango Pt 98.28 78.46 322.35
Trappers Crossing S Durango Pt to Holly Dr E 100 78.46 218.77
Trappers Crossing S Cripple Creek Pass to Hudson Tr 99.08 78.46 273.29
Trappers Crossing S Cherokee Tr to Hudson Tr 99.92 78.46 382.4
Trappers Crossing S Cripple Creek Pass to Mineral Pt 100 78.46 446.56
Meadowlark Court Sherman Lake Road to Cul-de-sac 95.01 78.46 148.68
Mineral Point Trappers Xing S to Sac 100 78.46 395.42
Hudson Trail Trappers Xing S to Cherokee Trail 98.48 78.46 676.73
Post Road Stagecoach Tr to #443 (Mid-Rad) 84.2 78.59 486.65
Killdeer Drive Killdeer Ct to Tamarack Ln 86 78.81 331.7
Ware Road Birch St to Ware Cir 85.54 79.05 432.66
Egret Lane Pelican Pl to Pelican Pl 85.1 79.07 418.81
Ruffed Grouse Road Wild Turkey Tr to Ruffed Grouse Ct 86.5 79.09 269.59
2nd Avenue Parkview Dr to Lake Dr 84.8 79.14 653.44
Oak Hollow Lane Linda Lane to Ravens Court 99.2 79.26 980
Pheasant Run S Aspen Lane to Dead End 87 79.34 398.8
Lonesome Pine Trail Hawthorn Rd to Bubble Sac 85.78 79.42 333.82
Prairie Flower Road Chippewa Tr to Sac 88 79.42 243.04
4th Avenue Elm St 160' to north 99.6 79.48 160
Linda Lane Oak Hollow Lane to Ravens Court 99.6 79.48 448
Fox Road
208 ft. from Fox Road/Deerwood Lane
to Red Fox Road 100 79.56 230
Fox Road Red Fox Road to Red Fox Road 100 79.56 724
Fox Road Red Fox Road to end 100 79.56 452
Red Fox Road Fox Road to Bubble 100 79.56 816
Red Fox Road Bubble to Fox Cove 100 79.56 745
Red Fox Road Fox Cove to Fox Hollow 100 79.56 223
Red Fox Road Fox Hollow to Fox Road 100 79.56 298
Bubble Red Fox Road to back of Bubble 100 79.56 100
Fox Cove Red Fox Road to end of Fox Cove 100 79.56 338
Fox Hollow Red Fox Road to end of Fox Hollow 100 79.56 168
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Lakota Trail
198 ft from Lakota Trail/Arrowhead
Drive to Ojibway Path 100 79.56 540
Lakota Trail Ojibway Path to Business Entrance 100 79.56 70
Lakota Trail Business Entrance to Birch Street 100 79.56 220
Ojibway Path Lakota Trail to Arrowhead Drive 100 79.56 1098.6
Carpenter Place Black Duck to East end 100 79.57 81
Vaughan Court Birch Street to end of sac 100 79.57 165
Snow Owl Lane Snow Owl Cir to Gray Heron Dr 86 79.57 355.28
Black Duck Drive S Aspen Ln to Tamarack Ln 87.48 79.59 583.36
Shadow Lake Drive W Hickory Pl to Prairie Flower Rd 88.5 79.67 510.66
Painted Turtle Road Shadow Lake Dr W to Hawthorn Rd 88.5 79.67 475.27
Arrowhead Drive Ware Rd to Ojibway Path 100 79.71 161
Arrowhead Drive Ojibway Path to Lakota Lane 100 79.71 773
Ravens Court Ware Road to Linda Lane 100 79.71 357
Ravens Court Linda Lane to Oak hollow Lane 100 79.71 543
Ravens Court Oak Hollow Lane to Sac 100 79.71 488
Royal Pines Place Holly drive to Sac 100 79.71 531.6
Elmcrest Avenue South City Limits to 65th St 100 79.73 243.4
Elmcrest Avenue Tart Lake Road to North City Limits 100 79.73 914.9
Oak Hollow Lane 99.2 79.81 146.51
Gray Heron Drive Snow Owl Ln to Whippoorwill Ln 86.5 79.85 374.16
Stage Coach Trail Post Rd to Post Rd 86.52 79.86 344.65
Ware Road Hawthorn Rd to Arrowhead Dr 86.64 79.91 624.98
Shadow Lake Drive W Prairie Flower Rd to Ironwood Cir 89 79.92 157.15
Timberwolf Trail Timberwolf Cir to Sherman Lake Rd 89 79.93 468.54
Egret Lane Pelican Pl to Blue Heron Dr 86.9 80.05 449.97
Aspen Lane Pheasant Run S to Black Duck Dr S 88.4 80.05 183.19
Snow Owl Lane Gray Heron Dr to Elm St 87 80.1 1361.26
Stage Coach Trail Post Rd to Forsham Lake Dr 87 80.1 290.98
Blue Heron Drive Hodgson Rd to Sandhill Dr 87.1 80.15 639.44
Grey Squirrel Road Sunflower Ln to Sac 86.12 80.18 269.43
Aspen Lane Black Duck Dr S to Killdeer Dr 89 80.36 641.59
Coyote Trail Lonesome Pine Trl to Linden Ln 87.65 80.4 377.63
Deerwood Lane Deerwood Circle to Fox Rd 86.46 80.4 488.17
Reiling Road Rolling Hills Dr to Whitetail Rdg 89.94 80.46 871.78
Fox Road White Owl Dr to Fox Cir 89.3 80.51 462.5
Ruffed Grouse Road Wild Turkey Tr to Sac 89.3 80.51 356.88
Antelope Drive Ulmer Dr to Green Briar Dr 86.6 80.54 190.6
Fox Road Deerwood Lane to Fox Cir 89.4 80.56 1056.47
Stage Coach Trail Post Rd to Sac 88 80.61 251.53
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Mourning Dove Road Sunflower Ln to Smoketree Ln 86.96 80.73 370.88
Muskrat Run Deerwood Ln to Fawn Ln 87 80.73 330.87
Pony Court Mustang Lane to Cul-de-sac 81.06 80.78 255.58
Shadow Lake Drive W River Birch Pl to White Owl Dr 90.5 80.78 538
Snow Goose Trail Pheasant Hills Drive to Cul-de-sac 91 80.78 289.33
Smoketree Lane Mourning Dove Rd to Sunrise Dr 87.2 80.84 328.43
Villiage Drive
ALLINA SPORTS CENTER to WOODS
EDGE BLVD 99.6 80.86 1204.5
Buckthorn Lane 12th Ave S to Whitetail Trl 98.8 80.9 499.75
Chokecherry Road Whitetail Trl to White Oak Rd 97.2 80.9 425.07
Chokecherry Road Sac to Whitetail Trl 94.36 80.9 476.69
Deer Pass Trail Rolling Hills Dr to Whitetail Rdg 93.3 80.9 523.35
Fox Road Deerwood Lane to E end 99.6 80.9 159.4
Fox Road Sac to Shadow Lake Dr W 97.4 80.9 494.23
Fox Road Shadow Lake Dr W to White Owl Dr 95.7 80.9 338.69
Hickory Place Shadow Lake Dr W to Sac 96 80.9 142.74
Ironwood Circle Shadow Lake Dr W to Sac 99 80.9 220.62
Killdeer Drive Aspen lane to Aspen Lane 96.8 80.9 126.84
Killdeer Drive Aspen Lane to Sac 97.4 80.9 157.83
Killdeer Drive Aspen Lane to Killdeer Ct 94.5 80.9 259.27
Kingfisher Court Birch St to Sac 96.8 80.9 489.63
Pheasant Hills Drive Timberwolf Tr to Sac 95 80.9 323.45
Pheasant Hills Drive Snow Goose Tr to Hawk Ridge Cir 99.6 80.9 348.85
Pheasant Hills Drive Broken Oak Ct to Pheasant Hills Cir 97.6 80.9 245.77
Pheasant Hills Drive Pheasant Hills Cir to Snow Goose Tr 97 80.9 259.54
Pheasant Hills Drive Hawk Ridge Cir to Timberwolf Tr 97.8 80.9 873.78
Pheasant Run S Aspen Ln to Birch St 91 80.9 961.49
Pondview Circle Sherman Lake Rd to Sac 91.92 80.9 425.13
River Birch Place Shadow Lake Dr W to Sac 94 80.9 651.6
River Birch Place
Shadow Lake Dr W to Painted Turtle
Rd 97.2 80.9 769.47
Ruffed Grouse Court Ruffed Grouse Rd to Sac 98.4 80.9 311.26
Shadow Lake Drive W Ironwood Cir to Painted Turtle Rd 95.2 80.9 417.52
Shadow Lake Drive W Fox Rd to White Owl Dr 93.4 80.9 385.52
Sherman Lake Circle Sherman Lake Rd to Sac 100 80.9 101.66
Sherman Lake Court Sherman lake Rd to Sac 97.94 80.9 228.81
Sherman Lake Road Sherman Lake Ct to Sherman Lake Cir 97.06 80.9 611.38
Sherman Lake Road Pondview Cir to Teal Ct 98.8 80.9 323.88
Tamarack Lane Black Duck Dr S to Killdeer Dr 92.72 80.9 571
Timberwolf Circle Timberwolf Tr to Sac 96.8 80.9 212.71
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Timberwolf Trail Timberwolf Cir to Pheasant Hills Dr 98.4 80.9 423.35
Velvetleaf Lane White Oak Rd to Sac 98 80.9 277.51
White Oak Road Whitetail Tr to 12th Ave S 98.4 80.9 496.75
White Oak Road Birch St to Chokecherry Rd 96 80.9 452.9
White Oak Road Chokecherry Rd to Velvetleaf Ln 96.6 80.9 232.67
White Oak Road Velvetleaf Ln to Whitetail Tr 96.28 80.9 851.52
White Owl Drive Shadow Lake DR W to Fox Rd 94.4 80.9 726.1
Whitetail Ridge Reiling Rd to Deer Pass Tr 96.2 80.9 412
Whitetail Trail White Oak Rd to Buckthorn Ln 96.44 80.9 335.73
Whitetail Trail Buckthorn Ln to Chokecherry Rd 95.2 80.9 555.9
Wild Turkey Trail Birch St to Ruffed Grouse Rd 95.8 80.9 699.72
Merganser Court Sherman lake Rd to Sac 95.58 80.9 552.48
Mourning Dove Road Elm St to Sunflower Ln 87.32 80.9 486.18
Painted Turtle Road River Birch Pl to Sac 97.4 80.9 152.35
Painted Turtle Road Hawthorn Rd to River Birch Pl 94 80.9 462.93
Aspen Lane Killdeer Dr to Sac 97.6 80.9 581.93
Fox Circle Fox Rd to Sac 94.24 80.9 172.58
Broken Oak Court Pheasant Hills Drive to Cul-de-sac 93.9 80.9 301.19
Deer Pass Trail Whitetail Ridge to Sac 97.6 80.9 119.75
Antelope Drive Wildflower Dr to Ulmer Dr 87.34 80.91 333.29
Blue Heron Drive Sandhill Dr to Egret Ln 88.75 80.99 474.95
2nd Avenue Ulmer Dr to Wildflower Dr 87.56 81.03 323.02
Town Center Parkway
CITY HALL ENTERANCE TO WOODS
EDGE BLVD 100 81.09 1691.7
Park Court Lake Drive to Stage Coach Trail 100 81.09 367.61
Stage Coach Trail North cul-de-sac to Park Court 100 81.09 123.45
Stage Coach Trail Park Court to Marshan Court 100 81.09 336.02
Stage Coach Trail Marshan Court to south cul-de-sac 100 81.09 174.4
Marshan Court Stage Coach Trail to west cul-de-sac 100 81.09 340.42
2nd Avenue Gladstone Cir to Glenview Ave 87.87 81.12 331.36
Black Duck Drive Partridge Pl to Lantern Ln 90 81.2 695.19
Fawn Lane Sac to Muskrat Run 88 81.22 698.35
Coyote Trail Bubble Sac to Coyote Ct. 89.44 81.31 773.45
Coyote Trail Coyote Ct. to Ware Road 89.44 81.31 377.94
Black Duck Drive Crystal Ct to Mallard Ln 89.5 81.34 311.55
Lantern Lane Black Duck Dr to Lantern Cir 89.5 81.34 527.06
Glenview Drive Rustic Lane to Glenview Ln 88.2 81.35 363.24
Whippoorwill Lane Gray Heron Dr to Elm St 89.5 81.37 1328.92
Beaver Circle Deerwood Ln to Sac 88.46 81.45 528.5
Beaver Trail Deerwood Ln to Fawn Ln 88.5 81.47 533.67
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Deerwood Lane Fox Rd to Sac 89.4 81.5 988.09
Sunfish Court Sunflower Ln to Sac 88.64 81.57 265.92
Sunflower Lane Mourning Dove Rd to Grey Squirrel Rd 88.76 81.63 317.01
Mallard Lane Black Duck Dr to Sac 90 81.64 336.68
Gray Heron Drive #7128 to Whippoorwill Lane 90 81.67 328.72
Gray Heron Drive Elm St to #7128 90 81.67 1159.3
Stage Coach Trail Forsham lake Dr to Sac 90 81.67 589.36
Marilyn Drive 77th St W to Barbara Ln 81.99 81.7 1043.5
2nd Avenue Glenview Ave to Parkview Dr 89 81.76 319.66
Park Court Lake Drive to West Cul-de-sac 100 81.93 560.53
Cinnamon Teal Court Sac to Elm St 90.5 81.97 354.06
Deerwood Lane Birch St to Beaver Trl 90.2 81.97 230.13
Red Hawk Trail Lonesome Pine Tr to Sac 75.26 81.99 296.05
Gladstone Circle 2nd Ave to Sac 89.6 82.07 311.21
Fawn Lane Muskrat Run to Beaver Trl 90.5 82.15 801.77
Phelps Road Arnt Construction to Otter Lake Rd 90 82.19 1317.58
Post Road #443 (Mid-Rad) to Stagecoach Tr 91 82.28 804.25
Snow Owl Circle Snow Owl Ln to Sac 91 82.28 393.24
Caribou Circle Wildflower Dr to Sac 90.2 82.43 333.64
Green Briar Drive Sunrise Dr to Antelope Dr 90.4 82.55 383.61
Sunflower Lane Grey Squirrel Rd to Sunfish Ct 90.8 82.8 448.59
Coyote Trail Linden Tr to Coyote Tr Bubble Sac 91.92 82.81 748.54
Black Duck Circle Black Duck Dr to Sac 92 82.86 408.99
Lantern Circle Sac to Lantern Lane 92 82.86 582.3
Shadow Lake Drive E Lantern Ln to Sac 92 82.86 558.28
Black Duck Court Sac to Black Duck Drive 98.4 83.15 318.12
Black Duck Drive Partridge Pl to Black Duck Cir #6796 99.2 83.15 1146.55
Black Duck Drive Black Duck Ct to Birch St 99.56 83.15 327.33
Black Duck Drive Shadow Lake Dr E to Black Duck Cir 98.68 83.15 249.71
Black Duck Drive Captains Pl to Black Duck Ct 94.28 83.15 541.54
Black Duck Drive Lantern Ln to Captains Pl 98.2 83.15 105.55
Black Duck Drive North End Sac to Crystal Ct 84 83.15 1651.78
Black Duck Drive Partridge Pl to Partridge Pl 96.72 83.15 426.27
Black Duck Drive Mallard Ln to Shadow Lake Dr E 93 83.15 487.35
Crystal Court Black Duck Dr to Sac 93 83.15 188.57
Egret Lane Hodgson Rd to Pelican Pl 94 83.15 463.8
Linden Lane Coyote Tr to Lonesome Pine Tr 92.96 83.15 1317.35
Shadow Lake Drive E Black Duck Dr to Lantern Ln 94 83.15 2166.98
Partridge Place Black Duck Dr to #6723 (south) 96.2 83.15 719.82
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Partridge Place #6723 to Black Duck Tr (north) 97.4 83.15 796.74
James Street #980 to Main St 83.56 83.27 441.9
Wildflower Drive Caribou Cir to Antelope Dr 91.6 83.28 333.63
Ware Road 62nd Ave to County Road J 92.6 83.29 2630.32
Fawn Lane Beaver Trail To Birch St 92.72 83.34 222.84
Sunflower Lane 2nd Ave to Sunfish Ct 92.2 83.6 208.05
Ulmer Drive Antelope Dr to 2nd Ave 92.2 83.6 928.08
Oak Lane Lake Dr NE to Carole Dr 83.97 83.64 832.18
Deerwood Circle Deerwood Lane to West Sac 92.4 83.65 125.26
Green Briar Drive Antelope Dr to 2nd Ave 92.4 83.68 909.65
Deerwood Lane Beaver Cir to Muskrat Run 93.9 83.8 484.75
Stage Coach Trail
174' SOUTH OF MARSHAN COURT TO
516' SOUTH OF MARSHAN COURT
(GRANDVIEW) 100 83.84 174.4
Glenview Lane Parkview Dr to Glenview Ave 92.8 83.84 324.6
Sioux Lookout Sioux Ln to Sac 94.28 83.96 614.65
Wildflower Drive 2nd Ave to Caribou Cir 93.3 84.08 603.17
Glenview Avenue 2nd Ave to Glenview Lane 93.58 84.21 494.56
Grey Squirrel Road Smoketree Ln to Red Clover Ln 93.9 84.36 330.8
Smoketree Lane Grey Squirrel Rd to 2nd Ave 93.9 84.36 603.1
Deerwood Lane Muskrat Run to Deerwood Cir 94 84.37 441.88
Glenview Lane Parkview Dr to Glenview Dr 94.8 84.77 824.14
Ware Road Ware Cir to Sioux Ln 96.2 84.85 208.04
Parkview Drive Glenview Ln to 2nd Ave 95 84.87 501.41
Grey Squirrel Road Sunflower Ln to Smoketree Ln 95.7 85.2 335.98
Deerwood Circle Deerwood Lane to East Sac 96 85.3 278.92
Red Clover Lane Grey Squirrel Rd to 2nd Ave 96 85.33 593.99
Sioux Court Sioux Ln to Sac 96 85.33 152.93
Ware Road Sioux Lane to Hodgson Rd. (CR 49) 100 85.42 670
Deerwood Lane Beaver Trl to Beaver Cir 82.07 85.42 222.91
Sioux Lane Sioux Lookout to #6629 97.74 85.42 352
Sioux Lane Ware Rd to Sioux Ct 100 85.42 779.51
Sioux Lane Sioux Ct to Sioux Lookout 100 85.42 308.57
Ware Circle Ware Rd to Sac 98.72 85.42 121.36
Ware Road Arrowhead Dr to Birch St 98.12 85.42 1040.89
Ware Road Coyote Tr to Hawthorn Rd 100 85.42 1461.14
Ware Road 62nd Ave to Linda Ave 98.8 85.42 309.33
Ware Road Linda Av to Coyote Tr 97.8 85.42 541.64
Aspen Lane Pheasant Run S to Pheasant Run S 100 86.56 183.19
Apollo Drive 88.6 86.73 1393.09
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Quarter Horse Court Lilac Street to Cul-de-sac 87.88 87.5 285.91
Apollo Court Apollo Drive to Sac 88.8 88.42 432
Oakwood Lane 83.1 88.8 622.3
Nancy Court 90.6 88.95 579.09
Marilyn Drive 79th St W to Oak Ct 89.4 89.01 418.09
Palomino Lane Mustang Ln to Cul-de-sac 90.42 90.1 800.47
Market Place Drive 92 90.45 794.29
Woods Edge Blvd Town Center Parkway to Village Drive 97.48 90.67 631.3
Lilac Street 91 90.68 1787.86
Lilac Street Apollo Drive to Sac 91.2 90.88 890
Savanna Court Ash St to Sac 91.4 91.08 458.38
Market Place Drive 93.76 91.55 1511.24
Pine Street 92.2 91.8 3845.98
Pine Street 92.8 92.28 1811.45
Highland Drive Highland Cir to Highland Ln 93 92.48 498.22
Oak Court Marilyn Dr to Oak Ln 93 92.48 369.63
Joseph Court Myrtle Lane to Sac 93.12 92.6 220
79th Street W Lake Dr NE to Nancy Dr 93.3 92.78 437.13
77th Street W Carole Dr to Lake Dr NE 93.4 92.88 1248.17
Jeanne Drive Marcia Lane to Lilac St 93.6 93.1 720.46
Palomino Lane Behm Ln to Lilac St 93.6 93.1 698.18
Carl Street #346 to sac 93.7 93.2 776.59
Palomino Lane Appaloosa Ln to Palomino Ln 93.9 93.4 368.25
Oak Lane Marilyn Dr to Oak Ct 94 93.48 473.06
Behm Lane Palomino Ln to Teckla Ct 94 93.5 788.39
Patti Drive Marcia Ln to Lilac St 94 93.5 736.81
Highland Circle Highland Dr to Sac 94.2 93.68 152.93
Marilyn Drive Oak Ln to Barbara Ln 94.4 93.88 1077.59
Palomino Lane Appaloosa Ln to Sac 94.5 94 481.56
Palomino Lane Pinto Lane to Mustang Lane 94.5 94 586.1
Patti Drive 74th St to Connie Ln 94.5 94 663.19
Highland Court Highland Dr to Sac 94.6 94.08 359
Highland Drive Highland Ln to Highland Tr 94.6 94.08 156.75
Market Place Drive 96.6 94.11 643.49
79th Street W Nancy Dr to Marilyn Dr 94.8 94.28 621.06
Behm Lane Palomino Ln to E end 94.8 94.3 152.6
Palomino Lane Palomino Ln to Behm Ln 94.8 94.3 798.61
Apollo Court 96.97 94.48 1054.37
Mustang Lane Palomino Ln to Pony Ct 95 94.5 496.69
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Lois Lane Meadow View Tr to 520' East 95.1 94.58 520.46
Highland Lane Highland Dr to Sac 95.2 94.68 213.48
Robinson Drive 97.2 94.71 284.25
Marilyn Drive 79th St W to Arlo Ln 95.4 94.88 138.95
Morgan Lane 97.4 94.91 557.86
Shetland Lane 97.4 94.91 461.08
Highland Drive Highland Ct to Highland Cir 95.6 95.08 798.34
Arlo Lane Joseph Ct to Henry Ln 95.6 95.08 772.63
Lois Lane Country Lane to #595 95.7 95.18 452.74
Oak Court Oak Ln to Sac 95.7 95.18 233.95
Marcia Lane Patti Dr to Jeanne Dr 95.7 95.2 750.04
Teckla Court Behm Ln to Sac 95.7 95.2 315.86
Highland Trail Highland Dr to Marilyn Dr 96 95.48 661.14
Arlo Lane Highland Drive to #665 96.2 95.68 415
Myrtle Lane Woodduck Tr to Joseph Ct 96.2 95.68 724.23
Carole Drive Oak Lane to 77th St W 96.4 95.88 1484.28
Marilyn Drive Oak Ct to Oak Ln 96.4 95.88 457.21
Vicky Lane Lake Dr NE to Nancy Drive 96.4 95.88 971.36
Highland Drive Marilyn Dr to Highland Ct 96.6 96.08 661.62
Lois Lane Greenwood Ln to Sherwood Ln 96.6 96.08 296.77
Arlo Lane Joseph Ct to Highland Dr 96.6 96.08 402.04
Behm Lane Teckla Ct to Lilac St 96.6 96.1 230.59
Jeanne Drive Connie Lane to Marcia Lane 96.6 96.1 1251.97
Appaloosa Court Appaloosa Ln to Sac 96.6 96.1 359.98
Arlo Lane #665 to Marilyn Drive 96.8 96.28 305
Stallion Lane Century Trail to 820' East 96.8 96.3 820
Carl Street
85 ft East of Clydesdale Circle/Carl
Street to end of sac 96.8 96.3 311
Century Trail 96.8 96.3 641.64
Mustang Lane Palomino Lane to Pinto Lane 96.8 96.3 793
Appaloosa Lane Lilac St to Appaloosa Ct 96.8 96.3 451.42
Joseph Court Myrtle Lane to Arlo Lane 97 96.48 330.19
Marilyn Drive Arlo Ln to Highland Tr 97 96.48 395.04
Wood Duck Trail Henry Ln to 200' W 97 96.48 200.1
Pinto Lane Century Trail to North Sac 97 96.5 550
Connie Lane Patti Dr to Jeanne Dr 97 96.5 661.15
Jeanne Drive 74th St to Connie Lane 97 96.5 658.79
Patti Drive Connie Lane to Marcia Lane 97 96.5 1275.26
Pinto Lane Palomino Lane to Mustang Lane 97 96.5 403.04
Henry Lane Arlo Ln to Woodduck Trail 97.2 96.68 429.96
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Lois Lane Meadow View Tr to 350' WEST 97.2 96.68 350
Pinto Lane Mustang Lane to Century Trail 97.2 96.7 277.91
Appaloosa Lane Appaloosa Ct to Palomino Ln 97.2 96.7 1203.45
Palomino Lane Sunset Avenue to Pinto Lane 97.2 96.7 642.86
Highland Drive Arlo Lane to Highland Trl 97.4 96.88 395.24
Lois Lane Marilyn Dr to #595 97.4 96.88 1288.46
Century Trail Shetland Lane to Robinson Drive 97.4 96.9 308
Clydesdale Circle Carl Street to end of sac 97.4 96.9 310
Praire View Place Country Ln to Meadow View Tr 97.6 97.08 570.81
Morgan Lane 99.6 97.11 477.05
Nottingham Lane Greenwood Ln to Lois Ln 97.8 97.28 1319.39
Century Trail 7850 Century Trail to Shetland Lane 97.8 97.3 438
Mustang Lane Pony Ct to Mustang Ct 97.8 97.3 357.3
Greenwood Lane Lois Lane to Nottingham Ln 98 97.48 575.02
Lois Lane Sherwood Ln to Nottingham 98 97.48 1377.3
Meadowview Trail Lois Ln to Prairie View Pl 98 97.48 1461.56
Nancy Drive Main St to Vicky Lane 98 97.48 392.88
Century Trail Stallion Lane to East #7790 98 97.5 839.6
Robinson Drive Century Trail to Shetland Lane 98 97.5 402
Wood Duck Trail Henry Ln to Myrtle Lane 98.4 97.88 693.5
Wood Duck Trail Myrtle Lane to Henry Lane 98.4 97.88 330.1
Century Trail Sunset Road to Pinto Lane 98.4 97.9 644.72
Century Trail Pinto Lane to Stallion Lane 98.4 97.9 955.68
Arabian Circle Century Trail to Sac 98.4 97.9 346
Robinson Drive 98.4 97.9 425.67
Henry Lane Woodduck Trl to Woodduck Tr 98.8 98.28 1357.65
Wood Duck Trail Main St to Henry Ln 98.8 98.28 237.89
Century Trail Century Trail to Sac 98.8 98.3 122.23
Robinson Drive Century Trail to East End 99.2 98.7 140
Market Place Drive Lake Dr to 1st Intersection 99.2 98.7 275
Lois Lane Country Lane to 176' West 99.6 99.08 697.15
Sherwood Lane Lois Ln to Carl St 99.6 99.1 492.78
Mustang Court Mustang Lane to Cul-de-sac 99.6 99.1 342.86
Mustang Lane Mustang Ct to Lilac St 99.6 99.1 488.49
Blackbird Lane Andall St to Sac 100 99.48 751.55
Kelly Street Lake Drive (CSAH 23) to Shelia Ave 100 99.48 832.36
Kelly Street Shelia Avenue to Timothy Court 100 99.48 952.53
Shelia Avenue Kelly Street to south cul-de-sac 100 99.48 483.84
Timothy Court Kelly Street to cul-de-sac 100 99.48 201.99
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Route Description Inspected
OCI Today’s OCI Length (ft)
Kelly Street Timothy Court to Wayne Court 100 99.48 380.12
Wayne Court Kelly Street to cul-de-sac 100 99.48 201.33
Kelly Street Wayne Court to Jane Ave 100 99.48 691.64
Jane Avenue Kelly Street to north stub 100 99.48 267.37
Kelly Street Jane Avenue to Lois Lane 100 99.48 787.87
Lois Lane 350' WEST TO NOTTINGHAMM LANE 100 99.48 200
Pine Street 100 99.48 1629.99
Pine Street 100 99.48 2997.9
Country Lane Prairie View Pl to Lois Lane 100 99.48 1534
Country Lane 77th St W to Prairie View Pl 100 99.48 811.46
Lois Lane Lake Dr NE to #790 100 99.48 572.66
Lois Lane Knoll Dr to Sac 100 99.48 937.51
Lois Lane #790 to Knoll Dr 100 99.48 2168.01
Aenon Place Main St to Sac 100 99.48 1118.05
Andall Street Hse #647 to Wood Duck Tr 100 99.48 960.03
Andall Street 4th Ave to Blackbird Ln 100 99.48 904.84
Andall Street Blackbird Ln to Wood Duck Trl 100 99.48 699.31
Andall Street Wood Duck Tr to Hse #647 100 99.48 1036.65
Wood Duck Trail Main St to Andall St 100 99.48 3124.53
Wood Duck Trail Andall St to Andall St 100 99.48 676.87
Robinson Drive Shetland Lane to West end 100 99.5 40
74th Street Jean to Patti Drive 100 99.5 627.95
74th Street Patti Drive to Jon Ave 100 99.5 366.9
Bradley Street Sunset Ave to Leonard Ave 100 99.5 605.19
Lilac Street 100 99.5 5163.54
Leonard Avenue Marvy St to Bradley St 100 99.5 1737.81
Leonard Avenue Bradley St to Lilac St 100 99.5 1537.91
Apollo Drive Lake Dr to Kohl's Lot 100 99.5 1201.75
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
Rondeau Lake
Peltier Lake
Marshan Lake
Centerville Lake
George Watch Lake
Sherman LakeWardsLake
Reshanau Lake
Rice Lake
Golden Lake
BaldwinLake
Bald Eagle Lake
AmeliaLake
Otter Lake
Cedar Lake
Rice Creek Marsh
RICE CREEKCHAIN OF LAKESREGIONAL TRAIL
County Hwy 10
County Hwy 14
County Hwy 21
County Hwy 23
County Hwy 14
Hodgson Rd
C o u nty H w y 2 3
Frenchman Rd
County Hwy 21
Blaine
Blaine
Lino
Lakes
Shoreview
Circle
Pines
Lexington
Circle
Pines
Lino
Lakes
Circle PinesShoreview
ColumbusLinoLakes Forest Lake
Grant
White
Bear
Twp.
Hugo
Lino
Lakes
HugoWhiteBearTwp.
Lino LakesNorthOaksLinoLakesShoreview Lino LakesWhiteBearTwp.
Lino LakesCenterville
Gordon Ave
L a m o tt e D r
Karth Rd
Arrowhead DrHokah Dr
Shadow Ct
Red
Maple La
Danube
St
H
o
k
a
h
Dr
C h i p p e w a T r Gaag
e
La
L a m o t t e C i r
Elbe St
Knoll Dr
Talle La
HollyCt
Joyer La
Rehbeins St
77th St E
Oak La
James St
Holly Dr
Peltier Lake Dr
WShadow
LakeDr
1 inch = 3,200 feet3/6/2013
Street Reconstruction PlanCity of Lino Lakes MN
Document Path: K:\02029-230\GIS\Maps\StreetReconPlan.mxd Date Saved: 2/25/2014 4:02:15 PM
Street Reconstruction Plan
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Phase 5
WS – Item #7
WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT
Work Session Item No. 7
Date: March 3, 2014
To: City Council
From: Jeff Karlson
Re: Joint Meeting with Charter Commission
Background
WSB recently launched a management analysis and development service by hiring Phil
Barnes, an experienced facilitator. WSB is in the process of marketing this new service
and has offered their services at a very low cost to Lino Lakes.
I had a meeting in January with Brian Bourassa and Mr. Barnes in which they shared
WSB’s new business concept. Brian suggested that Mr. Barnes could facilitate a meeting
with the City Council and Charter Commission to establish a “vision for success” and
help build an effective working relationship between the Council and Charter
Commission. The meeting could be a two-hour evening meeting and would be
completed in about two hours. WSB is willing to provide this service for a nominal cost.
If the Council supports this idea, staff would contact the Charter Commission and
establish a meeting date.
Requested Council Direction
Approval to arrange a meeting between the City Council and Charter Commission, which
would be facilitated by Phil Barnes, Management Analysis and Development Manager
for WSB.
Attachments
Phil Barnes’ Resume
Philip E. Barnes
Management Analysis and Development
Phil is a Risk Management expert with over 10 years of experience in
public sector management analysis, public works finance, strategic
planning, and project cost, schedule and scope management. Phil has led
over 100 diverse risk planning and assessment meetings that generated
various strategic directions, decisions, and project management plans.
Phil is experienced in leading Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
processes that integrate financial management, strategic planning, and
risk forecast results to align financial resources and policies with client’s
strategic direction.
Phil’s strength is facilitating collaborative decisions with diverse
stakeholder interests in order to develop effective program, policy, and
project management plans. Phil holds diverse experience in assessing
complex change management and budgetary impacts from policy,
program, and project decisions at a national, state and local level.
SELECTED EXPERIENCE
Risk Analysis and Strategic Management Development
Phil led a statewide Balanced Program Risk Analysis (BPRA) for Minnesota.
The BPRA process resulted in a programmatic tradeoff, and the creation
of Minnesota's Better Roads Program. The Better Roads Program will
address more than 700 miles of roads at a cost of $398 million.
Cost Savings through Risk-Based Budget Development
Phil led Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Highway Systems
Operations Plan risk and budget discussions. Facilitated discussions
resulted in the proposed cut of $189 million from original operations
budget estimates.
Public-Private Partnerships (P3)
Phil led the strategic planning and program management efforts for
MnDOT’s Alternative Transportation Finance initiative that focused on
developing P3 contracts. Efforts have resulted in recommended
procurement process and new legislative authorization for Public-Private
Partnership management.
Collaborative Public Decision Making
Phil led the development of a strategic vision, organizational structure,
and implementation plan, for Minnesota’s Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise (DBE) and workforce “Collaborative” team. The team won a
national “Excellence in Program Administration” award.
Project Management
Phil is experienced in applying risk-based cost estimation techniques and
authored Federal Highway Administration guidance on risk-based
contingency fund management for federal transportation projects. This
guidance still defines the federal perspective on mega project
contingency management.
Bachelor of Science in Finance,
University of Nebraska, 2000
Associate’s Certificate in Project
Management, George Washington
University, 2005
Item #8
Monthly Progress Report
March 3, 2014
Item Last Action Taken Staff Status
Digital Scanning Project 10/14/13 – Council approved hiring two
PT scanner operators
Jeff The new hires are currently
scanning council packets and
accounts payable records
7309 Lake Dr. Code
Violation
1/6/14 – Staff provided an update on this
code enforcement issue
Michael Attorney is reviewing staff
agreement
Labor Negotiations
(Sergeants)
1/27/14 – Council approved 2012-2014
contract with Sergeants
Jeff
Staff is negotiating with the
other three unions
ECFE Building 11/26/13 – The couple looking to start a
child care business passed the first review
of their SBA loan application and will
likely be approved January 2014
Jeff KW Commercial prepared a
draft lease agreement; still
waiting for word on final loan
application
Fire Department Analysis 2/24/14 – Springsted presented proposal
for a fire department analysis
Jeff Council will be asked to
approve the proposal at the
March 10 regular meeting
White Bear Lake Restoration
Assn. v. Dept. of Natural
Resources (DNR)
1/27/14 – Council voted against joining a
NE Metro coalition to intervene in the
WBL water level lawsuit
Jeff
Staff will stay on top of this
issue
Community Room
Conference Call/Audio
Streaming
2/3/14 – After reviewing the option of
purchasing a conferencing station,
Council directed staff to investigate &
report on all options, including audio
streaming
Julie Staff working with North
Metro Telecommunications on
options