HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/12/2004 Council PacketEXPANDED AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Tuesday,
October 12, 2004
(Closed Council Meeting)
With City Attorney
Council Work Room
6:00 p.m.
(ALL PRESENT. COUNCILMEMBER REINERT
ARRIVED AT APPROX. 6:20 P.M.)
Regular City Council meeting
Council Chambers
6:30 p.m. (6:40 P.M.) ALL PRESENT.
EDA -- following Council meeting
(9:30 P.M. — ALL PRESENT).
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
Open Mike
Call to Order and Roll Call ALL PRESENT.
Pledge of Allegiance
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON REQUESTED ITEM 1 D, SEPTEMBER 27,
2004 MINUTES BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND
CONSIDERED UNDER UNFINISHED BUSINESS.
1. Consent Agenda -
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) October 12, 2004 (Check No. 72059 through 72243 in the amount
of $281,688.49). Pg. 4 -21
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14453 through 14473 in the
amount of $16,044.61).
Pg. 22
B) Consider approval of minutes of September 13, 2004 City Council
Meeting
Page 1
EXPANDED AGENDA
C) Consider approval of minutes of September 22, 2004 Council Work
Session
D) Consider approval of minutes of September 27, 2004 City Council
Meeting
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA,
INCLUDING ITEMS lA THROUGH 1C. THE MOTION PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek
A) None.
3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A) Accept Resignation of Jon Rector, Public Services Pg. 23
MOTION BY MAYOR BERGESON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
DAHL, ACCEPTING RESIGNATION OF JON RECTOR AS RECOMMENDED
BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
A) Proclamation Declaring October to be Crime Prevention Month
Pg. 24 -25
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, DECLARING OCTOBER TO BE CRIME
PREVENTION MONTH AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
A) None.
6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala
A) Public Hearing. Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 23 -04, Vacating
Drainage and Utility Easement, Christopher Lee, 1049 Black Duck Court,
Jim Studenski Pg. 26 -32
MAYOR BERGESON OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM AT
APPROXIMATELY 6:52 P.M. THERE WAS NO ONE PRESENT WHO
WISHED TO SPEAK. MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED
Page 2
EXPANDED AGENDA
BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT
6:52 P.M. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, TO APPROVE FIRST READING OF
ORDINANCE NO. 23-04 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. UPON ROLL CALL
VOTE, THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
B) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -148 Authorizing Acceptance of 2004
DNR Oak Wilt Grant, Marty Asleson Pg. 33 -34
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
CARLSON, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-148, AS
RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
C) West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition, Dick Thompson Pg. 35 -51
i. Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 19 -04, Rezoning Certain
Real Estate to R -1 X, Single Family Executive
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, TO APPROVE FIRST READING OF
ORDINANCE NO. 19 -04 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. UPON ROLL CALL
VOTE, THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -95, Approving Preliminary
Plat and MUSA Allocation
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-95,
AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
D) Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition
i. Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 22 -04, Rezoning Property
from R -X to Residential / Planned Unit Development, Pheasant
Hills Preserve 12th Addition, Jeff Smyser Pg. 52 -55
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, FOR ADOPTION ON SECOND READING OF
ORDINANCE NO. 22-04 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. UPON ROLL VOTE,
THERE WERE FOUR AYES, AND ONE NAY. THE MOTION PASSED.
COUNCILMEMBERS REINERT, DAHL, CARLSON AND STOLTZ VOTED
AYE. MAYOR BERGESON VOTED NAY.
Page 3
EXPANDED AGENDA
ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -149, Approving Development
Agreement, Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition, Jim Studenski
Pg. 56 -72
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
REINERT, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-149, AS
RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
E) Public Hearing. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -139, Approving
Redevelopment Contract for Legacy At Woods Edge, Michael Grochala
Pg. 73 -83
THE COUNCIL CONSIDERED THIS ITEM AT LENGTH. FOLLOWING THE
STAFF PRESENTATION, MAYOR BERGESON OPENED THE PUBLIC
HEARING ON THIS ITEM AT APPROXIMATELY 7:37 P.M.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT
APPROXIMATELY 7:37 P.M. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-139,
AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. VOTE: THREE AYES, TWO NAYS. THE
MOTION PASSED. COUNCILMEMBERS REINERT, BERGESON AND
STOLTZ VOTED AYE. COUCNILMEMBERS DAHL AND CARLSON VOTED
NAY.
F) Consider Resolution No. 04 -146, Requesting Cooperative Agreement with
MnDOT for Lake Dr. /I -35W Ramp, Michael Grochala
Pg. 84 -86
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-146,
AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
G) Consider of Resolution No. 04 -147, Authorization of DSU contract for
35E Corridor AUAR, Michael Grochala Pg. 87 -93
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-147,
AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. VOTE: THREE AYES, TWO NAYS. THE
MOTION PASSED. COUNCILMEMBERS REINERT, BERGESON AND
STOLTZ VOTED AYE. COUCNILMEMBERS DAHL AND CARLSON VOTED
NAY.
Page 4
EXPANDED AGENDA
H) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -150, Authorizing Transfer of Otter
Lake Road — Right of Way - to Anoka County, Michael Grochala
Pg. 94 -96
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-
150, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
7. Unfinished Business
A) CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF
SEPTEMBER 27, 2004. COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON NOTED TWO
CHANGES TO THIS SET OF MINUTES. ON PAGE 9, LINE 418, SHE
REQUESTED THIS BE AMENDED TO READ "ASSISTED LIVING, AND
HOUSING FOR SENIORS." ON PAGE 5, LINE 220, SHE REQUESTED
THIS BE AMENDED TO READ, "LENGTH FOR A CUL -DE -SAC IS 500
FEET."
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
CARLSON, APPROVING THESE MINUTES WITH THE CHANGES
PROPOSED. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. New Business
A) None.
9. Community Calendar, October 13, 2004 through, October 25, 2004:
A) Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 6:30
p.m.
B) Charter Commission Meeting, Thursday, October 14, 2004, 7:00 p.m.
C) Council Work Session, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 5:30 p.m.
D) City Council Meeting, Monday, October 25, 2004, 6:30 p.m.
10. Adjourn
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:26 P.M.
THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Revised 10/6/04 ajb 9:21 a.m.
Page 5
AGENDA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
TUESDAY
OCTOBER 12, 2004
FOLLOWING REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Consideration of Minutes of September 27, 2004
3. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -03 Authorizing entering into a Contract for
Private Development by and between Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority
and Legacy Holdings /Lino Lakes, LLC
4. Adjourn
DATE
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
OTHERS PRESENT
DRAFT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES
: September 27, 2004
: J. Bergeson, D. Carlson, C. Dahl, J. Reinert, D. Stoltz
: None
: Gordon Heitke, Mary Divine, Michael Grochala and Bill
Hawkins
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 23, 2004
EDA Member Bergeson moved to approve the minutes of the February 23, 2004 EDA Meeting. EDA
Member Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF SALE OF PROPERTY TO E.G. RUD & SONS LAND SURVEYORS
A.
Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -02 Authorizing the Sale of Property.
Ms. Divine summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff is recommending approval.
President Reinert opened the public hearing at 6:12 p.m.
The EDA asked about access to the property, which Ms. Divine explained comes from Hodgson Road
and also a left turn lane that goes to the Shaw Property, where access would have to be granted.
EDA Member Carlson expressed concern about the amount of lakeshore, and if the City was getting
the full value for the property. She indicated it is really six acres of property, even if it is not all
buildable land. She questioned why the City would not try to keep land along the lake since they are
not being paid for it anyway. She noted it is a good company that will provide a quality building, but
she is concerned they are missing an opportunity for public ownership of lakeshore at a time when
they are looking to purchase lakeshore.
Staff explained how the piece of property came to be, noting it was pieced together from several other
situations. The utility easement on the property was clarified, as well as the fact that that easement is
a power company easement and cannot be vacated.
Ms. Divine clarified the appraisal is based on the full amount of acreage and on market value, not on
the buildable portion of land. She indicated while this property was not advertised for sale because
Staff was working on clearing up title issues, they have had people come in and ask about it, and
when the property was appraised they received this full market value offer, which they brought to the
EDA. She indicated if there were going to turn down this offer and put it on the market they would
have to make the decision to sell it for more than the appraised value.
EDA MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 2004
DRAFT
46 Jason Rud, Rud and Sons gave the history of the company, noting they are anxious to move their
47 offices to this property in Lino Lakes. He noted they have one tenant, who is a civil engineer that will
48 move with them, and gave a brief description of the type of building they would envision.
49
50 President Reinert closed the public hearing at 6:31 p.m.
51
52 City Attorney Hawkins noted a correction to the resolution, the second to the last paragraph, which
53 should read `Staff and City Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to prepare a purchase
54 agreement with the Buyer for the purchase of the property for the amount of $300,000.'
55
56 EDA Member Bergeson stated he would support this action, and thinks Staff has negotiated in good
57 faith. He indicated this is not necessarily a highly saleable parcel, and he thinks the use is ideal. He
58 does not want a high traffic user close to the corner.
59
60 EDA Member Dahl disagreed, indicating she feels this is a highly prized corner as well as being
61 lakeshore. She did agree Staff did a good job bringing this offer.
62
63 Community Development Director Grochala offered that the plat includes a portion of the lake, so
64 nearly half of the six acres is lake, and the remaining land is further encumbered with easements. He
65 stated after applying setbacks, the area you could actually place a building on is about a half acre
66 parcel, therefore the appraiser averaged out the square footage values and came up with an appraisal
67 of $300,000. He noted they are getting more out of this parcel than Staff thought possible.
68
69 EDA Member Stoltz expressed his support for the sale and for Staff's process for determining fair
70 market value. He added this parcel has been dormant on the tax rolls so the longer the City delays the
71 sale the longer the lack of income will continue. He agreed it is a gateway to the community, and
72 believes the Rud and Sons building would be a great addition to the community.
73
74 EDA Member Carlson noted the ponding and following easement agreement is important to her, and
75 she thinks $300,000 is an appropriate bid, so she will support.
76
77 President Reinert echoed the comments that this is a good use of land. He indicated he agrees with
78 EDA Member Carlson that they should save lakeshore when they can, but would like to see it be
79 useable lakeshore and not just add maintenance for the City.
80
81 EDA Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 04 -02 authorizing the sale of property at the
82 northeast corner of Highway 23 and Highway 49, with the correction noted by City Attorney
83 Hawkins. EDA Member Stoltz seconded the motion.
84
85 Motion carried unanimously.
86
87 ADJOURNMENT
88
89 There being no further business, EDA Member Carlson moved to adjourn. EDA Member Bergeson
90 seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
2
EDA MINUTES
91
92 Meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
93
94 Transcribed by:
95 Karen Bucklen
96 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
97
DRAFT
3
SEPTEMBER 27, 2004
AGENDA ITEM 3
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 10/12/04
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -03 authorizing
entering into a Development Contract with Legacy
Holdings /Lino Lakes, LLC
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND:
Earlier this evening the City Council considered approving a Contract for Private
Development between the city and Legacy Holdings, LLC. This redevelopment
contract involves tax increment financing generated from TIF District No. 1 -11.
Both the city and the EDA have various responsibilities under this contract.
The EDA technically controls the tax increment now that a TIF District has been
established. (The City Council was required to hold a hearing to approve the TIF
Plan, but once that happens, the district is controlled by the EDA.) Therefore,
the EDA issues the tax increment pay -as- you -go note, and enters into other
agreements regarding the tax increment.
The City controls the source of funds for the interfund loan and the Met Council
grant. Therefore, the City needs to approve these items in the contract. Also, the
City governs land use approvals such as the plat and PUD, which are referred
to under the contract. Finally, the City must issue the TIF Bonds (though the
pledge of tax increment comes from the EDA).
For all these reasons, both the City and EDA are included as parties to the
contract.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -03 authorizing A Contract for Private
Development.
2. Do not authorize the contract
3. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. 04-03
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN
THE LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES AND LEGACY HOLDINGS /LINO LAKES, LLC
BE IT RESOLVED By the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority ( "Authority ") of the City of Lino
Lakes, Minnesota ( "City ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Authority administers Development District No. 1 (the "Project)" pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 ( "Development District Act ").
1.02. The Authority, the City and Legacy Holdings/Lino Lakes, LLC (the "Developer ") have proposed to
enter into a into a Contract for Private Development (the "Contract "), setting forth the terms and conditions of
redevelopment of certain property within the Project, referred to generally as the Legacy at Woods Edge Project.
1.03. The Authority has reviewed the Contract and finds that the execution thereof and performance of the
Authority's obligations thereunder are in the best interest of the City and its residents.
Section 2. Authority Approval; Further Proceedings.
2.01. The Contract as presented to the Authority is hereby in all respects approved, subject to
modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive
Director provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval.
2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Authority
the Contract and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the Authority, and to carry out, on behalf
of the Authority its obligations thereunder.
Approved by the Economic Development Authority of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this of
2004.
President
ATTEST:
Executive Director
SJB- 253373v1
LN 140 -80
•
EXPENDITURES
OCTOBER 12, 2004
•
Date: 09/23/2004 Time: 15:25:14 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
oes:
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 4185 - 4185
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000008 EASTERBROOK, TIM 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 49.00 49.00 .00 .00
000156 SCHNEIDER, NIKKI 1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 176.20 176.20 .00 .00
000209 CITY OF RICHFIELD 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00
000241 ARCARD, TOM 1 28.50 28.50 .00 .00
000242 BARRON, JOE 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
000244 BANGERT, PHIL 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
000246 COPPERSMITH, GREG 1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
000258 COURNEYA, GORDY 1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00
0 DANZEL, BOB 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
0 DULLINGER - BROWN, GLORIA 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
000271 DOEGE, ROBIN 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00
000275 ENNETT, LARRY 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
000277 FARRIS, JIM 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
000291 GAGNON, BRENDA 1 105.00 105.00 .00 .00
000296 GINA, MARK 1 31.50 31.50 .00 .00
000314 HARELAND, SCOTT 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
000321 HUFFMAN, DARRYL 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
000330 JORGENSEN, DANIEL 1 31.50 31.50 .00 .00
000331 JOHNSON, CARL 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00
000344 KIRKLAND, KEITH 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
•
Date: 09/23/2004 Time: 15:25:14 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Name
# of items
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount
Net Gross Discount Lost
000345 LINDER, JERRY 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
000348 LUTZ, RICHARD 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
000363 LONGLEY, KATHY 1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
000395 MOSENG, DEAN 1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
000402 PERKEL, HARRIS 1 74.00 74.00 .00 .00
000416 BORNHOFT, REID 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
000436 PESCH, RICK 1 74.00 74.00 .00 .00
000445 MOLDENHAUER, ANDY 1 31.50 . 31.50 .00 .00
000448 SWAN, BARB 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00
000449 TSCHIDA, BOB 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
000451 VALBERG, LARRY 1 205.00 205.00 .00 .00
000464 UECKER, RUSSEL 1 28.50 28.50 .00 .00
000467 VALENTO, TIM 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
000473 WEBER, JANINE 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00
000474 WINDINGSTAD, LARRY 1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00
iilli AHN, ERIC 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00
BOROWICZ, CRAIG 1 42.00 42.00 .00 .00
000570 EWALD, ROB 1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
000572 FABIAN, BOB 1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
000582 FELLOWS, KELLY 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
000621 LYDEN, CHRISTOPHER 1 74.00 74.00 .00 .00
000665 HUGHES, TERRY 1 74.00 74.00 .00 .00
000674 HARRISON, KIM 1 28.50 28.50 .00 .00
000698 KEY LAND HOMES 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 .00 .00
000740 JOHNSON, BILL 1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
000742 KRUDWIG, MIKE 1 42.00 42.00 .00 .00
000751 KIRBY, DAVE 1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00
•
Date: 09/23/2004 Time: 15:25:14
Name
City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 3
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000774 HEAVENS, DAN 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
000819 GRONE, DOUG 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
000822 HOFMANN, JOHN 1 31.50 31.50 .00 .00
000883 LAMERE, DOUG 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
000923 BURNS, JOHN 1 84.00 84.00 .00 .00
000937 REED, STEVE 1 74.00 74.00 .00 .00
000949 HANSON, DOUG 1 70.00 70.00 .00 .00
000952 OSTERGREN, JERRY 1 74.00 74.00 .00 .00
000985 PRAY, SCOTT 1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
001090 RECKARD, BILL 1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 2,284.21 2,284.21 .00 .00
001113 SANDERS, BRAD 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
001129 SCHULLER, MIKE 1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00
001130 STEICHEN, KEITH 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .0D
001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 440.04 440.04 .00 .00
illik INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 420.00 420.00 .00 .00
FOSTER, BRAD 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
002996 REESE, LARRY 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
003091 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 1 416.00 416.00 .00 .00
003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 6,270.16 6,270.16 .00 .00
003567 GROW, CHRIS 1 28.50 28.50 .00 .00
003590 GLINSEK, SUSAN 1 28.50 28.50 .00 .00
003625 HUBBELL, JOEL 1 28.50 28.50 .00 .00
003627 HAMMERSTEIN, SANDY 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
003640 KEEN, PETE 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
003711 PICKHARTZ, STEVE 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
003754 SHOCK, TOM 1 64.00 64.00 .00 .00
•
Date: 09/23/2004 Time: 15:25:14 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
11111r # Name
Operator: JAL Page: 4
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
003781 TLACHAC, STEVE
003790 DEWIDT, ROB
003931 BENTSON, DAVE
003972 HEILING, RUSS
003985 MILLER, MIKE
003986 NASH, SCOTT
004001 PIERSON, STEVE
004063 SELLECK, ROD
004720 VIGER, JEAN
005011 RAMSAY, JERRY
900046 ORTH, DANIEL
900066 AVALON HOMES, INC.
900139 KLEHR, JENNY
900371 GREGORY, FORREST
Grand Totals:
•
1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00
1 63.00 63.00 .00 .00
1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
1 74.00 74.00 .00 .00
1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
1 61.52 61.52 .00 .00
1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
1 32.00 32.00 .00 .00
2 4,000.00 4,000.00 .00 .00
1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00
1 28.50 28.50 .00 .00
91 21,743.63 21,743.63 .00 .00*
Date: 09/30/2004 Time: 09:57:36
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 4202 4202
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Vendor # Name Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000209 RICHFIELD, CITY OF 1 4.00 4.00 .00
.00
000345 LINDER, JERRY 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
000489 TDS METROCOM 1 1,699.75 1,699.75 .00
.00
000695 J & N CONTRACTING 1 3,928.17 3,928.17
.00 .00
001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 466.11 466.11
.00 .00
001752 MOONEN, PATRICK 1 89.97 89.97
.00 .00
003490 PETTY CASH 1 92.18 92.18
.00 .00
003863 GLOCKE, MATT 1 32.00 32.00 .00
.00
Grand Totals: 8 6,349.18 6,349.18 .00 .00*
•
•
Date: 09/30/2004 Time: 10:53:37 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
dies:
Options:
Vendor #
000917
•
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 4204 4204
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Detail / Summary: S
Sort: N
Name
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Check Over Expend: N
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
KFC
1 170.61 170.61 .00
Grand Totals: 1 170.61 170.61 .00 .00*
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:53:08 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 4192 - 4192
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000017 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE 1 41.23 41.23 .00 .00
000080 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 1 21.45 21.45 .00 .00
000155 O'DEA, MARY JO 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
000158 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 1 3,168.00 3,168.00 .00 .00
000180 THILL, DEB 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00
000184 BOYLE, KATIE 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
000191 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. 2 2,377.63 2,377.63 .00 .00
000203 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS, LLC 3 2,072.86 2,072.86 .00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 5 144.73 144.73 .00 .00
000221 RAFFERTY, ROBIN G. 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00
illif AUTOMOTIVE DRIVE LINE, INC. 1 15.94 15.94 .00 .00
O'CONNELL, TERESA 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
000304 KUSTERMAN, BILL 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
000329 ROLEX, ALAN 1 721.52 721.52 .00 .00
000369 A -1 HYDRAULIC SALES /SERVICE, INC. 1 39.87 39.87 .00 .00
000370 CENTRAL COMMUINICATIONS 3 452.14 452.14 .00 .00
000423 TWIN CITY FAB, INC. 1 471.61 471.61 .00 .00
000477 ALPHA GROUP, THE 1 525.00 525.00 .00 .00
000481 OHIO UNIVERSITY 1 195.00 195.00 .00 .00
000483 WHITE BEAR LAKE, CITY OF 1 120.00 120.00 .00 .00
000499 CONTROLS & METERS, INC. 1 829.40 829.40 .00 .00
000508 BRUNN CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:53:08 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Name
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000509 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY 1 1,686.00 1,686.00
000511 LADEN, PERRY 1 50.00 50.00
000548 GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE 1 100.00 100.00
000675 BILL'S RENTAL CENTER, INC. 1 82.59 82.59
000677 PHILIP'S TREE CARE 1 545.81 545.81
000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 85.20 85.20
000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 2 25.62 25.62
000810 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 2 6,347.63 6,347.63
000843 HAGER, DALE 1 55.14 55.14
000879 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH PLAN 1 33,172.50 33,172.50
000905 HYDEN, MICHAEL 1 150.00 150.00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 501.31 501.31
000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 4,672.00 4,672.00
001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 400.93 400.93
001280 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 2 298.90 298.90
111112 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 3,503.35 3,503.35
1 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 3,893.00 3,893.00
001350 E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. 1 189.00 189.00
001473 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 1 1,223.00 1,223.00
001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 4,945.16 4,945.16
001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 118.85 118.85
001540 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. 1 24.74 24.74
001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 825.43 825.43
001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 287.12 287.12
001621 GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC. 1 55.66 55.66
001875 HUELMAN, PAT 1 50.00 50.00
001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 2 173.98 173.98
•
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:53:09 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
•r%
Name
Operator: JAL Page: 3
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
002130 TRALLE, PAUL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00
002243 LANE, SHARON 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00
002355 LINDY, GEORGE 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .00
002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 93.34 93.34 .00 .00
003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 3 184.80 184.80 .00 .00
003293 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY, INC. 1 364.00 364.00 .00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 3 306.88 306.88 .00 .00
003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 2 1,847.68 1,847.68 .00 .00
003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 82.15 82.15 .00 .00
004100 SPRINGSTED, INC. 1 1,300.00 1,300.00 .00 .00
004130 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, INC. 1 208.00 208.00 .00 .00
004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 3 937.96 937.96 .00 .00
004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 817.96 817.96 .00 .00
004350 T.K.D.A. 27 137,807.05 137,807.05 .00 .00
111/17 TASCHUK, PAM 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 6 1,446.80 1,446.80 .00 .00
004530 TURF SUPPLIES, INC. 2 3,482.02 3,482.02 .00 .00
004538 FREDERICKSON, AARON 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC. 1 414.00 414.00 .00 .00
004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 2 13,803.36 13,803.36 .00 .00
004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 1 99.30 99.30 .00 .00
004608 POGALZ, BRIAN 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
004609 ROOT, MICHAEL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00
004665 BAUMAN, BARBARA 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
004666 BOR, BARBARA 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
004715 SMITH, DENNIS 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
•
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:53:10 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 4
Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
004730 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC. 1 50.82 50.82 .00 .00
004880 ZACK'S INC. MUN. INDUS. SUP 1 111.34 111.34 .00 .00
900058 HANSON BUILDERS, INC. 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 .00 .00
900212 ESS BROTHERS & SONS, INC. 1 91.06 91.06 .00 .00
900235 CENTERVILLE, CITY OF 1 8,082.00 8,082.00 .00 .00
900477 PARTS ASSOCIATES, INC. PAI 1 139.45 139.45 .00 .00
900524 BURGER, LUANN 1 955.80 955.80 .00 .00
950061 KUKONEN, ROD 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 139 253,425.07 253,425.07 .00 .00*
-14-
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:59:50 Operator: JAL
•
Ranges:
Options:
Page: 1
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Fund: (A)
Dept Id: (A)
Program: (A)
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Schedule Journal #: (R) 4186 - 4206
Bank #: (A)
Cash #: (A)
Payroll Check Dates: (A)
Print: D
Report Format: 1
# of copies: 1
Total By Account: Y
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
Sort: D
Print Ranges /Options: Y
Process Payroll: N
Page on Sort: N
Description
Dept
Amount
72060 AHN, ERIC
72061 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A
72062 ARCARD, TOM
72063 AVALON HOMES, INC.
72064 BANGERT, PHIL
72065 BARRON, JOE
72066 HEAVENS, DAN
72067 BENTSON, DAVE
0 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC.
72068 BORNHOFT, REID
72069 BOROWICZ, CRAIG
0 BRUNN CONSTRUCTION, IN
72070 BURNS, JOHN
73 COPPERSMITH, GREG
4 COURNEYA, GORDY
75 DANZEL, BOB
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
72076 DEWIDT, ROB
72077 DOEGE, ROBIN
72078 DULLINGER - BROWN, GLORI
72079 EASTERBROOK, TIM
72080 EMMETT, LARRY
72081 EWALD, ROB
72082 FABIAN, BOB
72083 FARRIS, JIM
72084 FELLOWS, KELLY
72085 FOSTER, BRAD
72086 GAGNON, BRENDA
72087 GINA, MARK
72088 GLINSEK, SUSAN
72149 GLOCKE, MATT
72089 GREGORY, FORREST
72090 GRONE, DOUG
72091 GROW, CHRIS
72092 HAMMERSTEIN, SANDY
0 HANSON BUILDERS, INC.
•
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * **
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /366 SI * * * * * * **
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
TOW /ACURA
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /358 SI
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
DENTAL INSURANCE
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6488 S
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
70.00
176.20
28.50
4,000.00
64.00
57.00
37.00
32.00
85.20
64.00
42.00
1,500.00
84.00
32.00
63.00
57.00
2,403.24
63.00
70.00
64.00
37.00
64.00
32.00
32.00
64.00
57.00
57.00
105.00
31.50
28.50
32.00
28.50
37.00
28.50
57.00
3,000.00
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:59:50 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 2
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept
Amount
72093 HANSON, DOUG
72094 HARELAND, SCOTT
72095 HARRISON, KIM
72096 HEILING, RUSS
72097 HOFMANN, JOHN
72098 HUBBELL, JOEL
72099 HUFFMAN, DARRYL
72100 HUGHES, TERRY
72101 INTL UNION OF OPER ENG
72150 J & N CONTRACTING
72102 JOHNSON, BILL
72103 JOHNSON, CARL
72104 JORGENSEN, DANIEL
72105 KEEN, PETE
72106 KEY LAND HOMES
72107 KIRBY, DAVE
72108 KIRKLAND, KEITH
72109 KLEHR, JENNY
72110 KRUDWIG, MIKE
72111 LAMERE, DOUG
72112 LINDER, JERRY
72151 LINDER, JERRY
72113 LONGLEY, KATHY
72114 LUTZ, RICHARD
72115 LYDEN, CHRISTOPHER
72116 MILLER, MIKE
72117 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURAN
18 MOLDENHAUER, ANDY
9 MOSENG, DEAN
20 NASH, SCOTT
72122 ORTH, DANIEL
72123 OSTERGREN, JERRY
72124 PERKEL, HARRIS
72125 PESCH, RICK
72126 PICKHARTZ, STEVE
72127 PIERSON, STEVE
72128 PRAY, SCOTT
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN
72129 RAMSAY, JERRY
72130 RECKARD, BILL
72131 REED, STEVE
72132 REESE, LARRY
72133 SANDERS, BRAD
72134 SCHNEIDER, NIKKI
72135 SCHULLER, MIKE
72136 SELLECK, ROD
72137 SHOCK, TOM
72138 STEICHEN, KEITH
72139 SWAN, BARB
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /1550
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /314
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM EEC
REIMB BLDG ESCROW /577
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
HEALTH INSURANCE
ADVERTISING /LEGACY
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM EEC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
S * * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
CA * * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
my * * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
* * * * * * **
70.00
64.00
28.50
32.00
31.50
28.50
37.00
74.00
420.00
3,928.17
32.00
500.00
31.50
57.00
3,000.00
63.00
64.00
57.00
42.00
64.00
37.00
37.00
32.00
37.00
74.00
74.00
416.00
31.50
32.00
32.00
32.00
74.00
74.00
74.00
57.00
37.00
32.00
8,076.88
23.28
57.00
32.00
74.00
37.00
64.00
32.00
63.00
32.00
64.00
57.00
35.00
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:59:50 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 3
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
0
0
72140
72141
72142
72144
72146
72147
Description
Dept
Amount
T.K.D.A.
THILL, DEB
TLACHAC, STEVE
TSCHIDA, BOB
DECKER, RUSSEL
VALENTO, TIM
WEBER, JANINE
WINDINGSTAD, LARRY
72143 VALBERG, LARRY
CIRCLE LEX VFW /AUGUST
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
Total for Dept **
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC ADULT SP
Total for Dept 202
0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. JERSEYS
O BURGER, LUANN DANCE CLASSES
0 GREG LARSON SPORTS - G MARKING TAPE
0 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEM PROGRAM REC
Total for Dept 207
O BURGER, LUANN DANCE CLASSES
Total for Dept 208
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC SEPTEMBER 13
Total for Dept 401
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
3 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN
O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
72145 VIGER, JEAN
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
SEMINAR /TIM P & LISA H
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST
HEALTH INSURANCE
ADVERTISING
Total for Dept 402
YOUTH IN
YOUTH IN
YOUTH IN
YOUTH IN
YOUTH SP
36,828.73
10.00
63.00
64.00
28.50
64.00
70.00
63.00
68,328.20*
205.00
205.00*
3,168.00
898.80
55.66
364.00
4,486.46*
57.00
57.00*
MAYOR /CO 1,229.80
1,229.80*
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLIES ELECTION
REIMBURSE ELECTION SUPPL ELECTION
Total for Dept 403
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SENIORS
72153 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST SENIORS
Total for Dept 406
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FINANCE
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FINANCE
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE FINANCE
O ROLEX, ALAN MMILEAGE /PARKING /MEALS /L FINANCE
Total for Dept 407
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ECONOMIC
72154 PETTY CASH SEMINAR /POSTAGE /SUPPLIES ECONOMIC
•
-17-
148.76
76.80
15.00
48.99
2,024.92
26.60
2,341.07*
6.71
61.52
68.23*
4.72
50.06
54.78*
104.14
48.21
770.09
721.52
1,643.96*
29.75
13.48
20.93
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:59:50 Operator: JAL
Page: 4
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE ECONOMIC 352.18
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING /LEGACY ECONOMIC 26.60
Total for Dept 415 442.94*
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE PLANNING 59.50
O E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. PREP /DRAFT OF SKETCH OTT PLANNING 189.00
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PLANNING 26.65
0 HYDEN, MICHAEL QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING 150.00
0 LADEN, PERRY QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING 50.00
0 LANE, SHARON QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING 50.00
0 POGALZ, BRIAN QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING 100.00
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE PLANNING 704.36
0 RAFFERTY, ROBIN G. QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING 225.00
0 ROOT, MICHAEL QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING 150.00
0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK GIS SERVICE /AUGUST PLANNING 1,273.12
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC SEPTEMBER 8 PLANNING 217.00
O TRALLE, PAUL QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING 150.00
Total for Dept 416 3,344.63*
0 T.K.D.A. 2004 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERI ENGINEER 16,748.71
Total for Dept 417 16,748.71*
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE Communit 59.50
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Communit 28.09
72153 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST Communit 15.07
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE Communit 660.28
Total for Dept 418 762.94*
.9 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST POLICE 49.00
0 ALPHA GROUP, THE TRAINING /KENT S POLICE 525.00
O CENTRAL COMMUINICATION A T & T /JULY & AUGUST POLICE 452.14
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE POLICE 378.10
O FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONA PLACEMENT EVAL /3 POLICE 1,223.00
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS POLICE 228.66
0 HAGER, DALE REIMBURSE MEALS /GAS POLICE 55.14
0 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF PO PERMITS POLICE 41.23
72121 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST POLICE 440.04
O OHIO UNIVERSITY SEMINAR /RENEE K POLICE 195.00
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE POLICE 9,032.70
72072 RICHFIELD, CITY OF MUNICIPALS /KAREN A POLICE 30.00
72155 RICHFIELD, CITY OF MUNICIPALS POLICE 4.00
0 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVER TUITION /6 POLICE 1,686.00
0 STREICHER'S, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE 937.96
72156 TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST POLICE 520.83
0 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, IN UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE 99.30
0 WHITE BEAR LAKE, CITY REGISTRATION /KENT S & RE POLICE 120.00
72148 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST POLICE 28.10
Total for Dept 420 16,046.20*
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
•
FIRE 87.19
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:59:50 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 5
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept
Amount
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FIRE
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE FIRE
Total for Dept 421
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS BUILDING
72152 MOONEN, PATRICK REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW BUILDING
72153 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST BUILDING
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE BUILDING
Total for Dept 422
0
0
0
0
72153
0
0
0
72156
72148
0
AMERICAN FASTENER & SU
BILL'S RENTAL CENTER,
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS
T.K.D.A.
TDS METROCOM
XCEL ENERGY
ZACK'S INC. MUN. INDUS
0 A -1 HYDRAULIC SALES /SE
0 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER,
0 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU
0 AUTOMOTIVE DRIVE LINE,
0 BOYER TRUCKS, INC.
0 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC.
0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
0 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE T
0 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
0 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
0 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, IN
0 PARTS ASSOCIATES, INC.
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
0 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENT
0 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TI
0
72071
0
0
72154
0
0
72156
•
C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
MENARDS, INC.
PETTY CASH
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS
TDS METROCOM
BELTS STREETS
ROLLER RENTAL STREETS
DENTAL INSURANCE STREETS
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS STREETS
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST STREETS
HEALTH INSURANCE STREETS
ASPHALT STREETS
2004 SEALCOAT /AUGUST STREETS
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST STREETS
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST STREETS
WAND /HANDLE STREETS
Total for Dept 430
BRANCH TEE /NUT
PARTS
SHOP SUPPLIES
U -JOINT
PARTS
GASOHOL
DENTAL INSURANCE
STROBE
BATTERY
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
BATTERY ASSEMBLY FLEET
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FLEET
PLATE FLEET
SAW /PAINT FLEET
HEALTH INSURANCE FLEET
RESPIRATORS /BANDAGES FLEET
TRAILER TIRE REPAIR FLEET
Total for Dept 431
OFFICE SUPPLIES GOVERNME
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST GOVERNME
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS GOVERNME
OUTLET /COVER /SCREWS GOVERNME
SEMINAR /POSTAGE /SUPPLIES GOVERNME
HEALTH INSURANCE GOVERNME
SUBSCRIPTION GOVERNME
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST GOVERNME
37.51
1,802.06
1,926.76*
119.02
49.29
89.97
83.41
2,266.74
2,608.43*
26.80
82.59
119.01
75.87
50.06
1,355.89
817.96
88.62
111.87
3,503.24
111.34
6,343.25*
39.87
21.45
7.24
15.94
25.62
3,503.35
29.75
287.12
184.80
118.85
16.09
2,377.63
139.45
646.83
35.10
2,072.86
9,521.95*
494.60
2,245.38
12.12
4.73
7.05
495.20
208.00
792.52
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:59:51 Operator: JAL
Page: 6
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept
O TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR MAINTENANCE
0 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENT RESPIRATORS /BANDAGES
Total for Dept 432
72071
0
0
0
0
72153
0
0
72156
0
72148
CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA
MENARDS, INC.
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
PHILIP'S TREE CARE
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
TDS METROCOM
TURF SUPPLIES, INC.
XCEL ENERGY
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
SAW CHAIN
SEAL /ADHESIVE
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST
SPRAYING
HEALTH INSURANCE
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST
SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST
Total for Dept 450
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RECREATI
72153 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST RECREATI
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE RECREATI
Total for Dept 451
O BOYLE, KATIE
O FREDERICKSON, AARON
0 HUELMAN, PAT
O KUSTERMAN, BILL
•0 LINDY, GEORGE
O TASCHUK, PAM
O BAUMAN, BARBARA
0 BOR, BARBARA
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
O GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE
O KUKONEN, ROD
O O'CONNELL, TERESA
0 O'DEA, MARY JO
O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
O SMITH, DENNIS
0
0
72157 M
0
0
0
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
KFC
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
Total for Dept 452
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
HEALTH INSURANCE
QUARTERLY STIPEND
Total for Dept 461
DENTAL INSURANCE
LONG TERM DISABILITY
RECYCLING DAY LUNCH
HEALTH INSURANCE
ADVERTISING
RECYCLE USED OIL
Total for Dept 462
PARK BOA
PARK BOA
PARK BOA
PARK BOA
PARK BOA
PARK BOA
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
INS ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
ENVIRONM
SOLID WA
INS SOLID WA
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
Amount
414.00
15.72
4,689.32*
38.83
44.34
77.24
173.98
88.61
101.19
545.81
891.00
139.44
3,482.02
112.56
5,695.02*
153.01
57.60
67.27
1,791.54
2,069.42*
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
75.00
50.00
325.00*
100.00
100.00
10.41
4.91
100.00
150.00
100.00
100.00
196.02
100.00
961.34*
8.93
5.06
170.61
201.96
230.40
82.15
699.11*
Date: 10/01/2004 Time: 08:59:51 Operator: JAL
•
Page: 7
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE
O FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, IN TAGS
0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS
72154 PETTY CASH SEMINAR /POSTAGE /SUPPLIES
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE
Total for Dept 463
Dept
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
0 SPRINGSTED, INC. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS DEBT SEE
Total for Dept 470
0 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU
0 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI
0 CONTROLS & METERS, INC
O DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
0 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN
0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
O NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I
72153 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
72154 PETTY CASH
0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
72156 TDS METROCOM
0 TWIN CITY FAB, INC.
72148 XCEL ENERGY
PARTS WATER
UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE WATER
REGISTERS WATER
PARTS /SUPPLIES WATER
DENTAL INSURANCE WATER
LONG TERM DISABILITY INS WATER
CHEMICALS WATER
SEMINAR /TIM P & LISA H WATER
COPPERHORN WATER
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST WATER
SEMINAR /POSTAGE /SUPPLIES WATER
HEALTH INSURANCE WATER
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST WATER
WATER METER BOX WATER
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST WATER
Total for Dept 494
• 0
0 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLES /PAT SEWER
UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE SEWER
0 PARTS SEWER
0 DENTAL INSURANCE SEWER
0 BEEHIVE GRATE SEWER
0 LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SEWER
72154 SEMINAR /POSTAGE /SUPPLIES SEWER
0 HEALTH INSURANCE SEWER
72148 MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST SEWER
Total for Dept 495
C. W. HOULE, INC.
CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M
ESS BROTHERS & SONS, I
FORTIS BENEFITS, INC.
PETTY CASH
PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT
XCEL ENERGY
•
O BRAUER & ASSOCIATES,
0 CENTERVILLE, CITY OF TRAIL
0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK PROFESSIONAL SERVICE /AUG
0 T.K.D.A. 2004 SURFACE WATER /AUGUS
Total for Dept 499
L COMP PARK /REC
PLAN
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
Amount
10.41
24.74
4.91
12.50
196.02
248.58*
1,300.00
1,300.00*
110.69
200.47
829.40
125.05
78.85
29.12
4,945.16
15.00
13,803.36
50.06
48.84
1,030.01
135.09
471.61
1,836.30
23,709.01*
4,672.00
200.46
173.85
49.09
91.06
29.10
2.86
677.82
789.96
6,686.20*
6,347.63
8,082.00
574.56
84,140.99
99,145.18*
Grand Total 281,688.49*
•
•
•
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
10/5/2004
The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval:
DATE CHECK# NAME
10/5/2004 14453
10/5/2004 14454
10/5/2004 14455
10/5/2004 14456
10/5/2004 14457
10/5/2004 14458
10/5/2004 14459
10/5/2004 14460
10/5/2004 14461
10/5/2004 14462
10/5/2004 14463
10/5/2004 14464
10/5/2004 14465
10/5/2004 14466
10/5/2004 14467
10/5/2004 14468
10/5/2004 14469
10/5/2004 14470
10/5/2004 14471
10/5/2004 14472
10/5/2004 14473
Arthur Mohler
Centennial Firefighters Relief Assn.
Centennial Utilities
CenterPoint Energy
Century Power Equipment
Circle Pines Office Products
City of Lino Lakes
Comcast
Comfort Plus Heating & Cooling
Connexus Energy
Emergency Apparatus Maintenance
Lino Lakes State Bank
Metrocall
National Assn. for Search and Rescue
Nextel
North Metro Media Center
Orkin Exterminating
Sentry Systems, Inc.
Summit Fire Protection
Verizon Wireless
Viking Office Products
2 2 --
ACCOUNT
42110 - Other Maintenance
43010 - Relief Association
42251 - Station 1 - Gas
42253 - Station 2 - Gas
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance
42180 - Office Supplies Expense
43030 - Common Area Charge
42180 - Office Supplies Expense
42110 - Other Maintenance
42252 - Station 1 - Electric
42000 - Vehicle Maintenance
42220 - Travel, Conf., School
42240 - Telephone
42200 - Dues and Memberships
42240 - Telephone
42130 - Equipment Expense
42110 - Other Maintenance
42110 - Other Maintenance
42110 - Other Maintenance
42240 - Telephone
42180 - Office Supplies Expense
AMOUNT
5.07
6,630.00
102.86
64.76
150.50
15.61
5,206.00
95.00
692.85
345.93
436.05
220.00
84.64
54.00
142.19
630.29
56.23
280.67
400.00
228.90
203.06
16,044.61
AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 10 October 2004
SUBJECT Employee Retirement
VOTE REQUIRED 3/5
BACKGROUND
We have been notified that Mr. Jon Rector is retiring effective 1 December 2004. Jon
has been with the public services department since 1976. We would like to than Jon for his
many years of dedicated service to the community.
OPTIONS
1. Accept Mr. Rector resignation.
• RECOMMENDATION
Number One.
40
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM Jr A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: David J. Pecchia, Chief of Police
Public Safety Director
October 4, 2004
Crime Prevention Month 2004
Simple Majority
DATE
TOPIC
VOTES REQUIRED
BACKGROUND
Crime prevention month was designed to heighten crime prevention
awareness, generate support and participation in local anticrime
efforts among civic groups, schools, faith communities,
businesses, and individuals as they help to nurture communal
responsibility and instill pride throughout the City of Lino
Lakes.
Staff is requesting that council acknowledge and read the
attached proclamation in our support of designating the month of
October 2004 as Crime Prevention Month in the City of Lino Lakes.
OPTIONS
1. Motion to approve
2. Motion to deny
RECOMMENDATION
OPTION 1 - Approve support of Crime Prevention Month
•
•
•
Chief Pecchia announces that October is Crime Prevention Month. Please join the
citizens of Lino Lakes in recognizing Crime Prevention Month 2004.
PROCLAMATION
CRIME PREVENTION MONTH 2004
WHEREAS, the vitality of our city depends on how safe we keep our homes,
neighborhoods, workplaces, and communities because crime and fear diminish the
quality of life for all;
WHEREAS, crime and fear of crime destroy our trust in others and in institutions,
threatening the community's health and prosperity;
WHEREAS, people of all ages must be made aware of what they can do to
prevent themselves, their families, neighbors, and co- workers from being harmed by
drugs, violence, and other crime;
WHEREAS, the personal injury, financial loss, and community deterioration
resulting from crime are intolerable and require action by the whole community;
WHEREAS, crime prevention initiatives must include but go beyond self
protection and security to promote collaborative efforts to make neighborhoods safer for
all ages and to develop positive educational and recreational opportunities for young
people;
WHEREAS, adults must invest time, resources, and police support in effective
prevention and intervention strategies for youth, and teens must be engaged in driving
crime from their communities;
WHEREAS, effective crime prevention programs excel because of partnerships
among law enforcement, other government agencies, civic groups, schools, faith
communities, businesses, and individuals as they help to nurture communal
responsibility and instill pride;
NOW, THEREFORE, We, the Lino Lakes City Council members, do hereby
proclaim October 2004 as Crime Prevention Month in Lino Lakes and urge all citizens,
government agencies, public and private institutions, and businesses to recognize the
power of prevention and work together for the common good.
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 12, 2004
TOPIC: FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 23 - 04, Vacating a Drainage and Utility
Easement Across Lot 13, Block 2, Black Duck Estates
VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 VOTE REQUIRED
BACKGROUND:
The resident of Lot 13, Block 2, Black Duck Estates has petitioned the City to vacate the
existing easement south of the fence line located in their backyard to allow for shed
construction. The dimensions of the existing easement and the proposed vacation are
shown on the attached drawings. The existing easement was dedicated for drainage and
utility purposes.
The Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed the proposed vacation and has no
objections to changing the configuration of the existing easement. The Rice Creek
Watershed District approvals are attached. The easement south of the fence line is not a
wetland or floodplain and City Staff and the Rice Creek Watershed District feel an easement
north of the existing fence line, as shown on the attached drawings is adequate to address
the drainage in this area.
Section 12.05 of the City Charter requires that real property of the City cannot be disposed
of except by Ordinance. The Ordinance will require two readings, publication, and a waiting
period before it is in effect. The proposed schedule for this vacation is as follows:
First Reading of the Ordinance
Second Reading of the Ordinance
Publication of the Ordinance in the Legal Newspaper
Effective Date of the Ordinance
OPTIONS:
1. Approve the First Reading of Ordinance No. 23 - 04.
2. Return to staff for further consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Option 1.
October 12, 2004
October 25, 2004
Following approval of 2 "d Reading
30 days after publication
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 23 a 04
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
ACROSS LOT 13, BLOCK 2, BLACK DUCK ESTATES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. That it is in the best interest of the City to vacate the existing easement south of
the fence line located in the backyard of lot 13, block 2, Black Duck Estates, as shown on
the attached drawing.
Section 2. That the City of Lino Lakes held a Public Hearing before the City Council on
October 12, 2004 and October 25, 2004.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following
its passage and publication, in accordance with the City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of October, 2004.
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
NEIL SHED LOCATION
5 foot Utility &-
Drainage Easement (n
to remain
Established in 1962
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
REGISTERED UNDER THE LAYS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA
7501 79rd Avenue North 763 -560 -3093
Minneapolis, Minnesota 56428 Fax No. 560 -3522
3ururiurs (Grrtif irtttr
82.83
c
E
0 d
w
c
0
N B0.3B "W
c.l. fennc'
Ln
pi
co
Easement ♦sat
Be Vacated
l ~ N va2� 12i (9Te k
I •..l a: 1
of
{s5;
75.0
2 —STORY BRICK
N N N N 14.7
22.7 t'w0 11.7 0
0
INVOICE NO 67873
F.S.NO 972 -24
SCALE: 1" = 40'
o Denotes Iron Monument
❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set
for excavation only
x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation
2 00. Denotes Proposed Elevation
Denotes Surface Drainage
NOTE: Proposed grades are subject
to results of soil tests.
Proposed building Information
must be checked with approved
building plan and development or
grading plan before excavation
and construction.
Proposed Top of Block
Proposed Garage Floor
Proposed Lowest Floor
Type of Building
DOUG CHARLES CONTRACTING
Property located in Section
28, Township 31, Range 22,
Anoka County. Minnesota
Proposed Legal.desdription
Description to vacate that part of the utility and drainage easement as dedicated on Lot 13,
Block 2, BLACK DUCK ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof situate in
Anoka county, Minuesota•described. as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said
at 13 distant 70.00•feet.north.from the southeast corner of said Lot 13; thence North 00
grees 38 minutes 45 seconds East, assumed bearing, along said east line 43.50 feet; thence
orth 80 degrees lllminutes 38 seconds West 36,70 feet; thence North 85 degrees 49
minutes 10 seconds West 44.91 feet thence South 37 degrees 20minutes 08 seconds West
24.69 feet to the west line of said iiot 13; thence South 02 degrees 51 minutes 19 seconds
West along said west line 3536: feet thence North 8$ degrees 52 minutes 02 seconds East
7..21; feet to the point of beginning and there terminating.
ceptiogtherefroi) the east5.00'feet and the wea15.00:feet of said Lot 13.
Lot 13, Block 2, BLACK DUCK ESTATES
5 foot Utility & Drainage
:"17,-71X--Easement to remain
conc curb
BLACK DUCK COURT
The only easements shown are from plots of record or information
provided by client
We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of
o survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the
location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any. from or on
said land.
21st t���e_., rev.0 -09 -04 descr.
�,a
Surveyed by us this day of ar 2r, O4 rev 9-02-04 seback line
-28-
Signed
Charley/ . /Indereen, Minn. Reg. No.91753 or
Gregory R. Proech, Minn Reg Na. 24992
Bde 13- 2inv67B73 .S90
SEP -01 -2004 09:28
RICE CREEK WATERSHED
651 766 4196 P.02/02
RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
•
9/1/2004
Chris Lee
1049 Black Duck Court
Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1380
4325 Pheasant Ridge Dr. NE #611 • Blaine, MN 55449 -3070
Phone: 763 - 398.3070 • Fax: 763 -398 -3088
SUBJ: Wetland regulations RCWD #04 -123R
Dear Mr. Lee,
This letter is to. summarize our discussion of wetland regulations relating to your back yard area
at 1049 Black Duck Court in Lino Lakes. This is not meant to be a complete summary of all
wetland regulations, but at least the ones relevant to your stated intentions for your property.
It appears that the jurisdictional wetland boundary on your property roughly coincides with the
location of your back fence line. As we discussed, applicable wetland regulations prohibit any
filling, draining, or excavating in jurisdictional wetland. If you wish to extend your yard into the
wetland area you may do so as long as it does not involve any filling, draining, or excavation.
You would be allowed to clear existing vegetation by tree cutting and mowing and you can seed
the area. In addition, if you remove some dead stumps you would be allowed to fill the holes as
long as you do not raise the elevation above the existing ground. The addition of sod or topsoil
to the area would be considered as wetland fill and would be a violation. l would strongly
recommend that you avoid the use of heavy equipment in the wetland as this inevitably results
in some wetland fill or excavation. Please contact me if you have additional questions or
concerns.
Sincerely,
/c'
Ken Powell
Permit Coordinator, Prof. Wetland Scientist
C. r2C'r"vt Permit File uu-, -1238
City of Lino Lakes
District Inspector
District Engineer
BOARD OF
MANAGERS
Al Cardinal, Sr. - ~Roger K. Aiken lames A. Leroux Barbara A. Haake Robin C. Doege
Anoka County Ramsey Coi - 2 9 - Washington County Ramsey County Anoka County
MAY -06 -2004 15 12 RICE CREEK WATERSHED
RICE (IRjjIK /NATE
May 6, 2004
Chris Lee
1049 Black Duck Court
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Dear Mr. Lee,
b51 '(bb 41yb 1-".0/16
SHED ' DISTRICT
4325 Pheasanr Ridge Dr. NE #611 • Blaine, MN 55449 -4539
Phone: 763 -398 -3070 • Fax: 763 - 398 -3088
I met Bill Jeans at your residence today to review the area within the easement you are
proposing to vacate in order to expand your deck.
The portion of the easement you are proposing to vacate is not wetland or floodplain.
The Rice Creek Watershed District will not object to changing the configuration of the
easement if the following conditions are met:
1. The revised easement still includes all of your property north of the fence
around your yard.
2. The original easement and the revised easement language, along with a map
showing the angles and segments referenced in the legal description for both
easements. are submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District for review and
acceptance before the revised easement is recorded.
3. Proof of recording of the revised easement is submitted to the Rice Creek
Watershed District after it is approved.
4. The revised casement is recorded before work begins within the vacated
portion of the easement.
Please contact me if you have any questions or comments.
z:47 Sincerely I
Karl Hammers
Permit Coordinator
C: City of Lino Lakes
BOARD OF AJ, Cardinal. Sr.
MANAGERS Anoka County
Roger K. Aiken James A. Leroux
Ramsey Cour _ 3 0 _Nashington County
Barbara A. Hawke
Ramsey County
Harvey F. Korth
Anoka County
LOCATION MAy
BIRCH ST
948
1026
N
12C
904
58o
6582
6578
6574
566
974
98
986
922
lnOge
2.0c. /4
0 Li T 0 T
7a a c
$ 7
Ease men/ v•'
l••••. •
Bd1.3
0
N
-9
i•
r
:505'0 6
c...) //
Sr7e act
• /
•." •
i 4'2
.../.c' .
1 ; 1--
—L.
5 % / .
■
, . AN
.,
r ‘• !
I ,k,/ NI
.
4..,
'' ‘'' ■ .
• A :9 12 • F.:, ,,,,
7 i'‘ 2
1,--N •
.• :•1
4,1
‘," r
NI
4,
-.......... J \
1
J. 7 ■,, ■
1,:,
\1/4- i
I N
. -
8 ■ •__ ' ,..-k
NiID ,..,
Droinage F dill liy Easemeni
• 1
1
\ I,
.2
..i-i‘ • • 1!9.7q
— —SC4
E
It I r'
;
/ /
r.;•. I I .•:.::.-r199°21 '15 "E"
/ /
./ • .e...
0 el.
/
t.c;■ ::'14 ':'''•
I I
170. 22 LL-''S
}... ..... .
cv
•
.83
1/ d'C544.094"
/
/al a o
L /2% N
e
e '11
‘9;
4
14
7107
la I
1
15 •)
Is
41.
BIL A C K
DUCKp
{\.■ 6'4
:11
DRVE
COURT%
.•
71. 76.
,t, • .2
I o ••?.
. ...
9
,
i •
tc.
. zo.aa
>74.-675
I
/
1--; UN A - 3 2 -a r,
589°4'1'15"E
—249.0
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 12, 2004
TOPIC: Department of Natural Resources Oak Wilt Grant
BACKGROUND: Funds to assist Communities with the control of oak wilt are
available through a Grant with the Department of Natural Resources. The
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has approved a Grant request from
the City of Lino Lakes for oak wilt assistance for $7,000. These grant funds will
be used to assist residents with high -risk tree removals. The grant will match
50% of the residents' costs to remove high -risk trees.
Resolution No. 04 -148 authorizes the City to accept the 2004 Oak Wilt Grant
from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -148.
2. Do not approve.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1.
•
•
COUNTY OF ANOKA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -148
AUTHORIZING CITY TO
ACCEPT THE 2004 DNR OAK WILT GRANT
WHEREAS, The Lino Lakes City Council annually submits a DNR Oak Wilt grant
application; and
WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has approved the Oak
Wilt Grant Application and authorized a matching grant in the amount of $7,000; and
WHERAS, The Oak Wilt grant monies are used to cost share high -risk tree removals
with Lino Lakes residents;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino
Lakes hereby accepts the grant and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
grant on behalf of the City.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of October 2004.
ATTEST:
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
• AGENDA ITEM 6 C i. and ii.
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Richard E. Thompson, AICP
C. C. MEETING DATE: October 11, 2004
TOPIC:
i. Ordinance 19 -04: Rezoning to R -1X, Single Family Executive
ii. Resolution 04 -95: MUSA Allocation and Preliminary Plat
West Shadow Lake Ponds 2nd Addition
VOTE: 3/5 ordinance for rezoning
3/5 resolution for MUSA and preliminary plat
BACKGROUND:
KCR Lnvestments, LLC has submitted an application to subdivide an existing lot into two lots.
(See Attachment 1.) This will require a rezoning from Rural to R -1X, a preliminary plat, and the
allocation of 0.74 acres of MUSA Reserve. The site is guided for Low Density Sewered
Residential land use and is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area.
The project involves filling some wetland to create buildable area for one of the proposed lots.
Filling a wetland needs approval of the wetland mitigation from the Rice Creek Watershed
District. The applicant has revised his proposal to minimize wetland fill to 394 square feet,
which qualifies as a de minimus wetland fill.
The notification for a public hearing was published and mailed to surrounding property owners.
The Planning and Zoning Commission opened the public hearing and continued it to the
June 9, 2004, meeting.
Reconstruction of 62nd Street occurred this summer. Sanitary sewer and water was extended
west from the intersection with West Shadow Lake Drive to serve this property.
ANALYSIS:
Land Use and Zoning
The following is a summary of the proposal:
Gross Site Area 1.00 acres
Upland Area 0.74 acres (16,832 square feet & 15,241 square feet)
Total Lots 2
Net Density 2.7 units /acre
•
West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition
page 2
In the Comprehensive Plan, the parcel is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential. Land to
the east is already subdivided into low density unsewered residential; land to the south is guided
as low density unsewered residential, and land to the west and north is guided as low density
sewered residential. The project will need MUSA Reserve acres. The site is within the stage 1
growth area. The proposed land use change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The site is zoned Rural. The parcel is adjacent to R -1X on the north and is guided for sewered
residential use. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Lot Area Requirements
The proposed zoning of R -1X requires that each lot have no less than 12,825 square feet of
buildable land. Proposed Lot 1 will have 16,832 square feet of buildable and, while Lot 2 will
have 15,241 square feet of buildable land. Both lots as proposed will meet the minimum lot size
requirements of the R -1X Single Family Residential District.
Setback Requirements
The R -1X District has a minimum side -yard setback of 10 feet, rear yard setback of 30 feet, and
front yard setback of 30 feet. Both lots as proposed can meet setback requirements of this
District.
Driveway Location and Access
The plat map provided does not indicate the proposed locations of the driveways for Lots 1
and 2. The driveway for the existing house on Lot 1 enters 62nd Street. Given the topography of
Lot 2, the driveway for this lot should enter 62nd Street as well.
Wetland Fill and Mitigation
The applicant is proposing to fill 394 square feet (0.01 acres) of a wetland on proposed Lot 2.
The Rice Creek Watershed District has issued its permit for the project.
Parkland or Payment in Lieu
Since this parcel is too small for any kind of park land dedication, payment in lieu consistent
with the City's requirements will be required.
ENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS:
• 1) The Developer is to be aware that the City of Lino Lakes is currently reconstructing 62nd
Street. Prior to final approval of the Site Plans, the Grading Plan must show the changes
that the street project with cause to each of the proposed lots.
•
West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition
page 3
2) Prior to final City approval of the Site and Grading Plans, the Plans need to show that
Lino Lakes City Engineering Standards are being followed. That is, a detailed Site and
Grading Plan will need to be submitted before final approval is given.
3) Approval of the preliminary plat will be contingent upon the review and consequent
approval of the City Engineer. Drainage and utility easements along property lines will be
required. Easements over designated wetlands will also be required.
4) The homes to be constructed must follow City of Lino Lakes design flood elevations. For
this location, the design 100 -year flood elevation to be used is 894.2. The emergency
over flow elevation to be used is 895.3. Thus, City requirements are as follows: low
floor/basement elevation must be two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, low
floor/basement must be one (1) foot above the emergency overflow elevation and the low
floor/basement elevation must be four (4) feet above the groundwater or normal ponding
elevation.
LOT IMPROVEMENTS:
The applicant has donated the house on the property to the Lino Lakes Fire Department for a
training exercise. When the house is demolished, the applicant would wish to remove the
111 demolition debris and preliminarily fill the void and grade the site. Cleanup, filling, and grading
would remove any hazard posed by the demolition and would improve the site aesthetically. If
the development agreement has not been completed by then, the City Engineer may issue a
grading permit for minor earth moving.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
The Environmental Board reviewed the project on May 26 and recommended approval.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
The P & Z held a public hearing on the project on May 12 and June 9. The Board recommended
approval.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the application with the following:
i. Ordinance 19 -04, approving the rezoning from Rural to R -1X.
• ii. Approve Resolution 04 -95, approving the MUSA allocation and preliminary plat.
2. Deny the project with findings.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
This review is based on the following information:
1. Preliminary Plat Grading and Erosion Control Plan.
•
•
West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition
page 4
as of September 29, 2004
TOTAL
O
N
N
N: O CD N"' ti
I- Ln O No r O
N LO N
LC)
r
N
r
Lo
O
ch
e-
C
O
-_
O
c�
O
O
remaining of annual 36 -7.0 -7.1 15.4 30.6 26.6 36.0 36.0
2005 2006 2007 2008
O
co
co
O
O
LO
co
O
O)
O
CO
LO
d,
LO
O
M
LO
CO N—
O
LO
N.
N.
O
Cq
0
N
C
0
N
0
•
(C)
CO
'cr.
r
T
O
O
N
ti
CO
(0
LC-
in
r
(Y)
..q'
MO
N
O
•
cr)
N-
N
co
T
O
Z
0
Q
J
D
J
J
Q
Q
2)
D
E
J
Z
JJ
n
:9
JJ
Y
'annual target
'Stoneybrook
Century Farms North
Ravens Hollow
Justin's Preserve
'Junes Addition
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
Speiser Addition
'Birch St.: 441, 461, 473, 495
'proposed
West Shadow Ponds 2nd
cB
0
O
M
,O E O
n
0
w N
t4
LOTS /UNITS
L7)
O
O
N
CO
O
O
M
O
O
N
L
(0
a) =
>, a)
N
O
O
N
E
3)
1
0_
(0
d
ti
ti
N-
N
N
0)
N
c-
0')
O
C
CD
N
T
T
co
O
CY)
LC) N
T
(.J
T
T
T
Tt
N
O
T
N
Cb
T
VI
N
CO
T
(O
Ln
M
In
O
O
M
Cr)
M
("9
CO
N
Cr)
LO
Ct
0
N
T
N
Lo
T
(n
CO
T
N
CO
T
co
N
Co
T
T
c-
(fl
ti
T
Lf7
CO
T
co
L()
(--
T
Cj'
N
CO
ti
r
N
Ln
(0
L()
T
O
T
(Y)
N
N
N
T
T
O
T
In
'r.
LS)
103
249
T
56
10
M
152
N
O
T
T
Tr
N
O
T
N
18
CO
T
(D
(0
[Stoneybrook
C
Q
73
N
Century Farms North
[Keefe: prel plat, not final plat
1Morton (minor subdiv)
Ravens Hollow
Haley Manor (10 new lots)
Crystal Cove
Millers Crossroads
(Lakeview Estates (2 new)
C
0
.(
>
0
(n
O
C
—_
a)
( )
[Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th
Justin's Preserve
Marshan Estates
Rice Creek Church duplex
!Rice Church: Oakwood View
.O
CJ)
r
1Highland Meadows East 2nd J
Marshan Townhomes 2nd 1
Pheasant Hills 12th island
proposed
West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add
[Fox Den Acres (resubmittal)
total
ti
ti
N-
N
N
0)
N
c-
0')
O
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 19-04
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LINO
LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM RURAL (R) TO
RESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE (R -1X) FOR WEST SHADOW PONDS 2ND ADDITION
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1: Findings
The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the
property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd.1E of the Lino Lakes
Zoning Ordinance:
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive
Plan. The project complies with the land use in the Comprehensive Plan: the site is
guided for Low Density Sewered Residential use. Final platting will not occur until
2005 due to the requirements of the growth management policy. The project will be
consistent with both the MUSA and units /per year limitations of the growth
management policy.
2. The proposed use is, or will be, compatible with present and future land uses of the
area. The site is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential uses. Land to the south
and east is guided Low Density Unsewered Residential. Land to the west and north is
guided Low Density Sewered Residential. With sewer availability and with the
improvements to 62nd Street, these lots are ready to be converted to Residential
Sewered.
3. Upon compliance with the conditions of approval in Resolution 04 -95, the proposed
use will conform with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance
and other requirements. The lots proposed meet the requirements and standards of the
R -1X District.
4. The proposed use can be accommodated by existing public services and will not place
undue burden on the City's service capacity. Sanitary sewer service is available on
62nd Street. Water service also is available. Both systems have adequate capacity.
5. Traffic generation by the proposed lots is within the capabilities of streets serving the
® properties. Both lots will be served by the newly constructed 62nd Street, which can
easily handle the additional traffic.
•
•
•
Section 2
The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the
City Council on March 23, 2003, is hereby amended by rezoning from Rural to R1 -X, Single
Family Executive, pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino
Lakes, the following described real estate:
The North 189.08 feet of the South 229.08 feet of the West 230.36 feet of the East
1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 32, Township
31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota.
Section 3
As amended above, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously
amended.
Section 4
This Ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004.
Attest:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 4 2 -
Ordinance 19 -04, page 2
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04-95
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND THE ALLOCATION OF
0.74 ACRES OF MUSA RESERVE FOR WEST SHADOW PONDS 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City has received application for developing property; and
WHEREAS, the development requires approval of the allocation of Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) Reserve and approval of a preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning and Board on June 9, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the proposed MUSA allocation and preliminary plat meet the requirements of the
City's Growth Management, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 19 -04 rezoning the site to R -1X, Residential
Executive for residential development;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves
the allocation of 0.74 acres of MUSA Reserve for the West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves the preliminary plat for West
Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition subject to the following conditions:
1. That driveway access for Lot 2 is determined.
2. After the existing house is burned, the City Engineer may issue a grading permit if the
development agreement is not yet completed to allow for removal of demolition debris,
filling the hole, and performing preliminary grading to avoid creation of safety hazards and
to improve the appearance of the lot.
3. The easement around the wetlands must include additional buffer as proposed by the
applicant. Wetland and buffer areas are to be identified with signs saying no fill, cutting, or
dumping. Native seed mix from the City's list is to be used in these areas.
4. That the Engineer's recommendation be addressed prior to submission of the final plat.
5. The Project shall not be final platted until 2005 to comply with the City's growth
management policy.
6. Park dedication shall be cash.
•
7. This approval is based on the following plans and information, and supporting
documentation:
- Preliminary Plat, Grading and Erosion Control plan
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2004.
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
•
•
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 4 4 - Resolution 04 -95, page 2
Environmental
Memo
To: Jeff Smyser
From: Marty Asleson
CC: Michael Grochala
Date: June 1, 2004
Re: Environmental Board Recommendations From 5126/04
The Environmental Board made the following recommendations at the May 26, 2004
Environmental Board meeting:
Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addition
1. Ensure that the lighting plan conforms to the City code.
2. Make changes to the landscape plan species list as per December 3rd
Environmental Board recommendations:
• Change Black ash to Green ash or one of the native oak species.
• Change Colorado spruce to white spruce.
• Change Austrian pine to Red or White pine.
• Change Autumn applause to Northern pin oak.
\ 3. Reduce impervious parking surfaces if possible.
\4. No soils should be imported or exported with out City permission.
5`\ Deep tilling should occur on all planting areas.
• Page 1
-45-
r•
6. Re -seed native seed in pond area. Use the City specifications. This should be
coordinated between the City, Developer, and the existing town home
association.
7. All sod areas should be irrigated.
Motion made recommending to approve by Grundhoffer, 2nd by O'Connell, all
were in favor.
West Shadow Ponds 2 "d Addition
1. Wetland areas and buffer areas proposed are identified with signage describing
no fill, cutting or dumping.
2. The City should approve all imported or exported soils.
3. All soils to be restored with plantings should be deep titled to a minimum depth of
6 to 8 inches before planting.
4. Item 5a of deed restriction document include language that includes
specifications for City native seed mix in buffer areas if disturbance occurs or
replanting occurs.
5. Show the location of tree preservation fences on the plan.
Motion to recommend approval with suggestions made by Bauman, 2nd by
O'Connell, All were in favor.
• Page 2
- 4 6 -
312
120r
25
d 21 24
Z *E,BER
AO° /
4
15
4
ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT- OF -WAY PLAT NO. II
41131 WI
"i'iiiiiiii •n�—
��i oPc .A _
T7 3. '4 9B
•1D,':`'�' ' 4 O .L. r
Ip� 41Laall \■4k -49— 41119, iriV
YLim +niuw at MOE Ip 10 av
�1LII20l91IB11T' 1514 13.-1 4
IV
SA .\t►.n4 A • ID III¢ 3
f z 1�I�Ell 5
221-T-
-o-
1110
3
4
9 1 5
TRAIL
8
7
Hr � BEW
�
y I4 �� .-
ie
6
W
28
3233
OLD
ROA
9 lolls,
5
7
5
DITC NO. 25
4
�ND
STREET
k6
- 4 7 -
(
LANDUSEPLAN
•
•
PROPOSED LAND USE
Low Density
Sewered
Residential
Stage 1 Growth Area Border
West Shadow Ponds
2nd Addn
•
•
Zoning Map Detail
•
S
d
1
a
Wi
•
€�
....•••••••".
/
\
Lt)
1 • • ,k
:‘
L-•,4 ■
t`r) -------- cy) — — —
. ri!-q - - - .-•
,--, , !-......,..... !_„,c_t 4=4.,
,.„.., i • L.,.....:)....,.-.-.L .....,...1,, „II,
0 1 -- - - ,o 1 .... \ .,,i
8 V. t - - Le...', acres `1,x).,-...
116,832 SE Upla n(l) i --- — •..
...
........_--
0- 'I:7,, 1.----, .t--43.:-.)1, ; •
..r".• // /
‘ ,
-, —
1 ! \
IS / L.. , . ._ _.„L I.Lt', i
! • 4 4 I 4-.1
4,C)' SeiEack Lin.P.R:
/ • gC"--.- ! 1,
1 • c,
j I lip,. ix .1
d>9 r
9D1
7 C
/
/
1
Siltfence
•
AGENDA ITEM 6 D i
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
C. C. MEETING DATE: October 11, 2004
TOPIC: Second Reading: Ordinance 22 -04,
Rezoning From Rural to PUD
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition
VOTE: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 22 -04 on September 27th. This
is the second reading.
• Once approved, this ordinance will be published next week and become effective 30 days
from publication, as required by the city charter.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 22 -04, approving the rezoning.
2. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 22-04
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES BY REZONING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FROM R -X AND R -1
TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR
PHEASEANT HILLS PRESERVE 12TH ADDITION
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1: Findings
The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the
property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd.1E of the Lino
Lakes zoning ordinance:
1. Mr. Ed Vaughan submitted an application for an amendment to the zoning ordinance
to rezone land to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The currently zoning of the site
is R -X., Rural Executive.
• 2. The proposal includes platting the site as Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition.
•
3. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City
Comprehensive Plan, as the site is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential uses.
4. The proposed use is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The site
is guided for Low.Density Sewered Residential use. Land to the west is guided for
similar use and is developed as a single family neighborhood. Land to the north is a
regional park reserve. Existing and anticipated future land uses in the area are
considered compatible with the proposed uses.
5. Upon compliance with the conditions of approval set forth in Resolution 04 -136, the
proposed uses will conform with all performance standards contained in the zoning
ordinance and other requirements.
6. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the City's service capacity. Utilities are currently available to the site and
there is ample capacity for the addition of eight homes.
7. Traffic generation by the proposed use —eight new homes —is within capabilities of
streets serving the property.
•
•
Section 2
The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by
the City Council on March 10, 2003 is hereby amended by rezoning from R -X, Rural
Executive to Residential Planned Unit Development pursuant to the provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate:
(see Attachment A for legal description)
Section 3
Development shall conform with plans, requirements, and conditions of approval listed in
Resolution 04 -136 and associated information.
Section 4
As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously
amended.
Section 5
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2004
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 54 - Ordinance 22 -04, page 2
•
•
ATTACHMENT A: LINO LAKES ORDINANCE 22 -04
Description of
PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE 12TH ADDITION
Outlot D, PHEASANT BILLS PRESERVE, Anoka County, Minnesota,
EXCEPT that part of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE being in the West one
half of the Northwest one - quarter, Section 27, Township 31,. Range 22 Anoka County,
Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing. at the Southeast corner of the West one -half of said Northwest one -
quarter, Section 27; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West along the East
line of said West one -half, Northwest one quarter, Section 27 a distance of 57.73 feet
to the Southeast corner of said Outlot D for a point of beginning of the tract to be
described; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the East. line
of said Outlot D a distance of 910.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 22 Minutes'49
seconds West, a distance of 580.47 feet; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds
East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D, a distance of 548.90 feet; thence
North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49' seconds East, parallel with the South line of said
Northwest one quarter, Section 27; a distance of 416.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees -00
minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D a distance of 370.14 feet
to -the Northerly right -of -way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10 (Anoka County Right -of -Way Plat
No. 11); thence North 85 degrees 24' minutes 36 seconds East along said right -of -way
line a distance of 28.66 feet; thence continuing along said right -of -way line along a,
curve concave to the- North (which has a radius of 3879.72 feet, a delta angle of 02 degrees 00
minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 136.02 feet) a chord bearing and distance of
North 86 degrees 24 minutes 53 seconds East, 136.01 feet to the point of beginning.
And EXCEPT the North 1100 feet of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, Anoka
County, Minnesota.
And EXCEPT the South 400 feet of the North 1500 feet of the East 600 feet of Outlot D,
PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, Anoka County, Minnesota.
- 5 5 - Ordinance 22 -04, page 3
•
AGENDA ITEM 6Dii
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 12, 2004
TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -149, Approving Development Agreement for
Grading and Bridge, Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition
Vote Required: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the preliminary plat of Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
Addition on September 27, 2004. Ed Vaughan, the Developer, is now requesting
approval to begin grading and bridge work for the Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
Addition Development. Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition consists of eight
residential lots.
In accordance with the preliminary plat approval and City policy staff has
prepared a Development Agreement for Grading and Bridge. The agreement
provides for the following:
1. Submittal by the developer of a Letter of Credit in the amount of
$750,000.00 representing 150 percent of the development improvement
costs to insure completion of the project in accordance with the approved
plans.
2. Deposit of a cash escrow in the amount of $62,000.00 to reimburse the
City for costs incurred by the City related to the development and
improvements of the site and developer improvements.
Ed Vaughan has reviewed the contract and is aware of the conditions set forth.
OPTIONS:
1. Return to staff for further review.
2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -149, Approving Development Agreement for
Grading and Bridge, Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition.
3. Not adopt Resolution Number 04 -149.
40 RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution Number 04 -149 be adopted.
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -149
RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR GRADING AND BRIDGE,
PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE 12TH ADDITION.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
Addition on September 27, 2004, and
WHEREAS, the Developer, Ed Vaughan, is requesting approval to commence grading and
bridge work of such development to be known as Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition; and,
WHEREAS, the City's subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution of
a development contract, between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes, prior to
commencement of site construction activities and final plat approval to insure satisfactory
completion of public improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves the
Development Contract with Ed Vaughan, for Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition and
authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the city.
• Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of October, 2004.
•
Ann J. Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
- 5 7 -
•
•
•
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
(Site Grading and Bridge Only)
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition
THIS AGREEMENT made this 12th day of October, 2004, is by and between the
City of Lino Lakes, whose address is 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, 55014, a
municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as
the "City ", and Ed Vaughan whose address is 1432 Pheasant Hills Drive, Lino Lakes, Minnesota,
55038, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ".
WHEREAS, the Developer has received preliminary plat approval from the City
Council for a plat of land within the corporate limits of the City known as Pheasant Hills Preserve
12th Addition, hereinafter called "Subdivision ", said land is legally described to -wit
Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, Anoka County, Minnesota,
EXCEPT that part of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE being in the West one half of
the Northwest one - quarter, Section 27, Township 31,. Range 22 Anoka County, Minnesota
described as follows:
Commencing. at the Southeast corner of the West one -half of said Northwest one - quarter,
Section 27; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West along the East line of said
West one -half, Northwest one quarter, Section 27 a distance of 57.73 feet to the Southeast
comer of said Outlot D for a point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 01
degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the East. line of said Outlot D a distance of
910.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 22 Minutes'49 seconds West, a distance of 580.47 feet; thence
South 0.1 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D, a
distance of 548.90 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49' seconds East, parallel with the
South line of said Northwest one quarter, Section 27; a distance of 416.00 feet; thence South
01 degrees -00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D a distance of
370.14 feet to -the Northerly right -of -way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10 (Anoka County Right -of -Way
Plat No. 11); thence North 85 degrees 24' minutes 36 seconds East along said right -of -way line
a distance of 28.66 feet; thence continuing along said right -of -way line along a, curve concave to
the- North (which has a radius of 3879.72 feet, a delta angle of 02 degrees 00 minutes 31 seconds, and
-58-
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
an arc length of 136.02 feet) a chord bearing and distance of North 86 degrees 24 minutes 53
seconds East, 136.01 feet to the point of beginning.
And EXCEPT the North 1100 feet of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
And EXCEPT the South 400 feet of the North 1500 feet of the East 600 feet of Outlot D,
PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, Anoka County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested approval to commence with site grading
and bridge construction activities, and
WHEREAS, the City Subdivision Ordinance and Minnesota Statute 462.358
authorize the City to enter into a performance contract secured by cash escrow or other security to
guarantee completion and payment of such improvements following final approval and recording of
final plat; and
herein,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made
IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO: that the
I. DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS
A. Improvements to be installed at the Developer's expense by the Developer as
hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to as "Developer Improvements ".
II. DEVELOPER'S IMPROVEMENTS
A. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare, at the Developer's expense, a grading plan,
preliminary street, bridge, and utility plan, and a surface water management plan.
The Developer shall secure a contractor to install these improvements; said
contractor shall be approved by the City at its ABSOLUTE discretion. All
Developer improvements shall require City inspection and approval and, where
appropriate, the approval of any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. The
Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the following
improvements according to the following terms and conditions:
1. Grading Plan
a) A final site grading plan, including certified wetland delineation, with
maximum two -foot contours and cross sections as necessary shall be
submitted and approved by the City prior to commencement of any site
grading. The plan shall provide custom grading of each lot, provisions
for rainwater gardens, and shall be subject to the approval of the City
prior to any site grading. The final site grading plan shall also be
page 2
-59-
•
•
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
subject to the approval of any other govemmental agency having
jurisdiction, including but not limited to the Rice Creek Watershed
District (RCWD). No building permits shall be issued until all site
grading has been completed to the satisfaction of the City.
b) A designated preservation area shall be established in accordance with
the grading plan as approved by the City where no grading, clearing, or
any disturbances to the existing natural state may occur. Permanent
monuments (as approved by the City) designating the preservation area
limits shall be furnished and installed by the Developer. An established
legal covenant shall be recorded against each property providing for no
removals or disturbances within the preservation area and requiring the
maintaining of this area in its natural state for perpetuity. The legal
covenant shall also require that no wetlands may be disturbed beyond
100 feet from the back of their homes. All legal covenants shall be
submitted to the City Attorney for review.
c) The grading plan and all site grading shall be provided and conducted
in accordance with NPDES requirements and the Developer shall
perform the work in accordance with a Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) requirements.
d) The Developer shall be responsible for securing all required site grading
and development approvals and permits from all Federal, State, Regional
and Local agencies with jurisdiction prior to the commencement of site
grading or construction and prior to the City awarding construction
contracts for public utilities.
2. Erosion Control Plan
a) The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all
erosion control measures to be implemented during construction.
Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement
of site grading or construction. The erosion control plan shall also
be subject to the approval of any other governmental agency
having jurisdiction.
b) The Developer shall submit a Turf Establishment Plan which details
topsoil placement, seeding, sodding, mulching, fertilizing and
watering. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the
commencement of site grading or construction.
page 3
-60-
•
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
3. Tree Preservation Plan
a) The Developer shall provide a tree preservation plan prior to any site
grading and include a delineated preservation area, subject to the
approval of the City prior to any work activity on the site. The tree
preservation plan shall also be completed in accordance with the
City Tree Preservation Policy, and shall be covered within a legal
covenant for each property. The Developer shall provide a cash
escrow as security, in the amount specified in Attachment B, to
insure implementation of the Tree Preservation Plan. Site activities
shall not commence until review of the plan and site has been
completed and approved by the City Engineer, City Forester, and any
other governing agency with jurisdiction as required.
b) The Developer shall remove, dispose of, or treat all dead and
diseased trees in accordance with the City Forester's
recommendation before building permits will be issued.
4. Grading and Erosion Control Construction & Maintenance
a) Prior to the commencement of site grading and erosion control, the
Developer shall complete items II.A.1, II.A.2, and II.A.3 as listed
above.
b) The Developer shall grade the site to within 0.2 foot of the grades
shown on the approved Grading plan. No deviations will be allowed
unless a revised plan is submitted and approved by the City and all
other regulatory agencies.
c) All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented
by the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the
best potential for preventing soil erosion.
d) Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the
different stages of development. Appropriate control measures as
required by the City shall be installed prior to development when
necessary to control erosion.
e) Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that
adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as
construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land shall be
exposed at any one period of time.
•
•
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
f) Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soil shall be set aside
for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be
restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality
at least equal to the soil quality prior to development.
The Developer shall install four (4) inches of topsoil on all
boulevards and seed or sod as approved by the City. The Developer
shall make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops to bring them
flush with the topsoil prior to occupancy.
g)
h) All disturbed areas shall be seeded.
i) The front 50 feet of the lots, the street right -of -way, storm water
storage ponds, and surface water drainage ways shall be graded prior
to commencement of utility construction.
j) Drainage swales, ditches, storm water storage ponds and other high
risk erosion areas shall be protected from erosion.
k) All remaining grading must be completed prior to issuance of
building permits.
1) Protect streets from erosion deposits. This should include a
combination of roadside silt fences, roadside sod strips, catch basin
rock bale inlet protection, rock construction entrances, straw mulch,
and/or street sweeping.
m) The developer's engineer shall certify, in writing with an as -built
survey, that all grading complies with the grading plan prior to
issuance of building permits.
n) A legal covenant shall be included within the homeowner's
association documents prohibiting the use of phosphorus on lawns.
5. Bridge Plans and Construction
a) The Developer shall submit complete bridge construction plans to the
City for subsequent review and approval by the City, Rice Creek
Watershed District (RCWD), Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, and other governmental agencies as may be required. Bridge
construction plans shall be subject to the approval of the City prior to
commencement of any site grading or site work activity.
b) The bridge shall be privately owned and maintained. There shall be
provisions within the homeowner's association documents that provides
for periodic maintenance and inspection of the bridge in accordance with
page 5
-62-
•
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
MnDot requirements. The association documents shall also be written to
enable the City to enter and access the bridge for public purposes and/or
effect maintenance repairs as may be deemed necessary in the interest of
public safety, health, and welfare, and shall allow the City to assess said
maintenance and repair costs to the homeowners.
c) The Developer shall construct the bridge in accordance with the
requirements of the a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources.
d) In addition to the bridge plans, the Developer shall conduct and provide
a pre - construction survey and monitoring program for noise and
vibration for both the bridge construction and entire site development
construction. The pre - construction survey and monitoring program must
be approved by the City prior to any grading or construction activity. A
temporary noise wall (subject to the approval of the City Engineer) must
be constructed around any pump or sound emitting device that will run
beyond day -time working hours.
e) Improvements to be constructed by the Developer, including the bridge
and site grading will utilize existing City streets for access. An existing
condition survey of Ruffed Grouse Terrace shall be conducted by the
City. In the event that damages to the street or other City infrastructure
result from said improvement work, the Developer shall be responsible
for effecting said repairs, or the City shall withhold escrows or deposits
as the City deems appropriate and necessary.
f) Homeowner's Association documents and legal covenants as required
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuing
of any building permits. The homeowner's association documents shall
include a funding mechanism for maintaining of the bridge.
g) The Developer shall provide a financial security or cash escrow in an
amount of $ 750,000 to assure completion of the bridge or restoration of
the site in the event the bridge is not completed by the Developer. No
site grading or other work of any kind (except for bridge construction)
shall be allowed on the island until the bridge is completed.
6. No burning of vegetation cleared during construction shall be allowed.
7. The project shall not be final platted until 2005 to comply with growth
management policy.
•
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
8. All homeowners association declarations, covenants, and property and legal
requirements as required in this Agreement shall be submitted to the City
Attorney for review as required by the City's final plat requirements.
9. Park dedication shall be provided in cash to the City by the Developer in an
amount of $13,320.
10. The posting of signs for the protection of Blanding' s Turtles shall be posted
as required by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
11. Cost of Developer's Improvements, description and completion dates are as
shown on Attachment A.
11. Construction of Developer's Improvements:
a) The construction, installation, materials and equipment shall be in
accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City.
b) All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and
approval of the City and, where appropriate, any other governmental
agency having jurisdiction.
c) Prior to the acceptance of Developer Improvements by the City, the
Developer shall obtain final plat approval and record the final plat
which will dedicate all permanent easements necessary for the
construction and installation of the Developer's and City's
Improvements as determined by the City.
d) All Construction debris and trash shall be properly disposed of at the
developers expense and in a timely manner as determined by the
City.
12. The Developer • shall be required to obtain all necessary permits and
approvals from all governmental agencies as required, including necessary
right -of -way, temporary easements, or permanent easements for the
construction.
13. Guarantee
a) Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letters of Credit
(1) The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms
and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the
Developer for the installation and construction of all
Developer's Improvements and hereby guarantees the
•
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
workmanship and materials for a period of one year
following the City's final acceptance of the Developer's
Improvements. Concurrently with the execution hereof by
the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times
thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified
check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred
fifty (150 %) percent of the total estimated cost of
Developer's Improvements. An Irrevocable Letter of Credit
shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Lino
Lakes and shall state thereon that the same is issued to
guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the
terms and conditions of this Development Contract and
construction of all required improvements in accordance with
the ordinances and specifications of the City. The City
reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion
of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of
guaranteeing the terms and conditions of this contract. The
Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended
for additional periods of one year from present or future
expiration dates unless thirty (30) days prior to such the City
Clerk or Administrator is notified in writing by certified mail
that the Letter of Credit will not be renewed.
b) Reduction of Escrow Guarantee.
(1) The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit,
or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the
completed improvements at the time of the requested
reduction. Prior to the final acceptance of the Developer's
Improvements the City shall require a Performance Bond or
Cash Escrow to cover the warranty provisions of the
agreement. The amount shall be determined by the City
Engineer.
III. CITY'S IMPROVEMENTS
A. No City improvements are proposed under the grading/bridge project.
IV. RECORDING AND RELEASE
A. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a
covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees
that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with
the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. This
shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Pages 1-4 hereof. City shall
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
provide to Developer upon payment of all the special assessments levied against a
parcel a release of such parcel from the terms and conditions of this Development
Contract subject to provisions contained in this contract.
V. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. The Developer agrees to establish a non - interest bearing escrow account with the
City in an amount determined by the City Administrator or his designee for the
payment of all costs incurred by the City related to the development of the plat and
the Developer Improvements including, but not limited to, the following (See
attachment B for Breakdown of costs):
1. Plat Review Fee
2. Planner Review Fee
3. Administration - 3% Construction Cost
4. Engineering
a) Administration
5. Legal - Plat Review
6. Publications
B. If the above escrow amounts are insufficient, the developer shall make such
additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to
reimburse itself from the Escrow.
VI. HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
A. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours set out in City Ordinances as
follows:
Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed
VII. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS
A. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract and
acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall
become City property without further notice or action.
VIII. INSURANCE
A. Developer or all its subcontractors shall take out and maintain until one (1) year
after the City has accepted the private improvements, public liability and property
damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property
page 9
-66-
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of his
subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for
bodily injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no /100
($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00)
Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less then Two
Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a
combination single limit policy of One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars
or more. The City, its employees, its agents and assigns shall be named as an
additional insured on the policy, and the Developer or all its subcontractors shall file
with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat.
The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance
written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain
any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice.
IX. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE
A. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in
defense of enforcement of this contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs
and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees if the City prevails in such action.
X. VALIDITY
A. If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this
contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development
Contract.
XI. GENERAL
A. Binding Effect
1. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and insure to the
benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties
hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the
Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land.
B. Notices
1. Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or
demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the
other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by
United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1 by
certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be
deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the
mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as
set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above.
page 10
-67-
•
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
C. Final Plat Approval
1. Prior to Final Plat Approval the Developer shall enter into a comprehensive
Development Contract with the City. Such agreement shall provide for
submittal of all bonds, security, escrows and documents as required by the
City's Public Improvement Financing Policy, conditions of preliminary plat
approval, and City Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances.
page 11
-68-
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
DEVELOPER CITY OF LINO LAKES
By
Developer
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA
By
Mayor
ATTEST:
By
Clerk
On this day of , 20 . before me, a Notary Public within and for said County,
• personally appeared
•
(Mayor) and (Clerk), to me known to be respectively the Mayor
and Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge
that they executed the same on behalf of said City.
Notary public
•
•
Development Contract — Site Grading and Bridge Only
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
On this day of , of 20, before me, a Notary Public within and for
said County, personally appeared (Developer), to me known to be the
, of , a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that
they executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they/he executed the same on behalf
of said corporation.
Notary Public
ATTACHMENT A - GRADING AND BRIDGE ONLY
SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS
DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NAME:
APPLICANT:
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition
Edward Vaughan
ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS
1 SITE GRADING(INCL. BRIDGE)
2 EROSION CONTROL
3 SITE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
4 LANDSCAPING
6 STREET CONST.
A. Subgrade /Base Course
B. Wear Course
7 STORM SEWER CONST.
A. Trunk
B. Lateral
C. Surface Water Mgmt. Charge (s.f.)
SANITARY SEWER CONST.
A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.)
B. Trunk Credit
C. Trunk Unit Charge (REU)
D. Lateral
9 WATERMAIN CONST.
A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.)
B. Trunk Credit
B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU)
C. Lateral
SUBTOTALS:
BUDGET
COST
Estimate
Estimate
Estimate
Estimate
NOTE
e
e
e
e
Estimate e
Estimate e
Estimate
Estimate
e
e
a
a
Estimate e
Estimate
See Attachment B for security amounts to be posted
NOTE:
a: Cost by City policy
b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City
c: Previously Assessed
d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board
e: Provided by Developer
f: Estimate by Feasibility Study
- 7 1 -
10/4/04
a
a
NUMBER OF REU's:
8
ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 8.82
DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW
IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z)
$470,000
$10,000
$20,000
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
ATTACHMENT B - GRADING AND BRIDGE ONLY
CITY FEES
DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NAME: Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
APPLICANT: Edward Vaughan
NUMBER OF REU's: 8
ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 8.82
BUDGET DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW
ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS COST NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z)
1 PLANNING /REVIEW
A. Plat Review Fee $5,000 b $5,000
B. Planner Review Fee $5,000 b
$5,000
2 ENGINEERING
A. Plan /Plat/Grading Review $0 b $10,000
B. Preparation of Plans & Specs. $0 b
C. Construction Services $0 b $20,000
D. Construction Staking $0 b $0
E. City Engineering $0 b $5,000
3 ADMINISTRATION
A. Administration Fee - 3% of const. $15,000 a $15,000
B. Legal $1,000 b $1,000
C. Publications $1,000 b $1,000
4 DEVELOPMENT FEES
• A. Park Dedication $0 d $0
B. Sealcoating Fee a
C. Aerial Photo Fee a
5 BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING b
6 DEVELOPMENT SECURITIES
A. Tree Preservation b
B. Street Lighting - installation b
C. Street Lighting - operation b
D. Traffic Signing b
E. Street, St. Swr., Pond Maint. b
F. Other - Property Tax, FEMA b
TOTALS: $0 0 $62,000
SECURITY AMOUNTS TO BE POSTED Att. A Att. B Total
X = DEV. IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 1.5 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $750,000 $0 $750,000
Y = CITY IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 0.35 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $0 $0 $0
Z = CITY FEE COSTS X 1.0 (CASH ESCROW) SO $62,000 $62,000
NOTE a: Cost by City policy
•b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City
c: Previously Assessed
d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board
e: Provided by Developer
f: Estimate by Feasibility Study
- 7 2 -
10/4/2004 attachments(b) 09- 29- 04.xIs
•
AGENDA ITEM 6E
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala
DATE: 10/12/04
TOPIC: Continuation of Public Hearing: Consideration of
Resolution No. 04 -139, Approving a Redevelopment
Contract for Legacy at Woods Edge
Vote Required: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
Hartford Group, Inc. has submitted a proposal for development of Legacy at
Woods Edge, the mixed use downtown project on 35W and Lake Drive.
Estimated market value of this project is in the range of $116 million -$138
million.
In 1997 the Town Center Committee, a group of citizens who were selected to
develop the concept, formulated a list of objectives (see attached) for the town
center. The Hartford project realizes the vision of the original ideal. The following
is a summary of the project and the benefits to Lino Lakes:
PROJECT
1. Diversity of Housing
• Total of 450 Housing Units
• 60 Affordable Rental Units
• 60 Units Senior housing
• At least 30 Units Market Rate Affordable For -Sale Housing
• Market Rate For -Sale Townhomes
2. Commercial
• Up to 350,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses, including first floor tenant
space with housing above, and separate for -sale retail and office pads.
3. Open Space
• Approximately one acre in the center of the project area dedicated to
public use. This area will have a water feature, gardens, and a band
shell fnr nnmmtinity events.
• A neighborhood park area within the townhome site.
• Nine acres of natural open space adjacent to the regional park.
4. High amenity public improvements
• Town Center Parkway will be improved with a center boulevard,
decorative lighting with planters, paver bricks on the public sidewalks
and crossings, planters and other public amenities. A traffic circle at
the center of the project will provide a focal point for auto and
pedestrian traffic.
TANGIBLE BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY
• Unique opportunity for a development that is partly inside and partly
outside a TIF district.
• A minimum of $60 million in commercial /residential tax base on the tax
rolls from new construction outside the TIF District.
• Up to $137 million in economic development that increases the tax
base upon completion of the TIF District in 16 years.
• Development that provides the improvements needed for the YMCA.
• Source of revenue to improve Lake Drive and 35W interchange.
• $2.2 million sale of city owned land that will be now be generating tax
base.
• Community green to provide a place for civic /community functions.
INTANGIBLE BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY
• Gathering Place that creates a sense of community identity and pride.
• Presents a new and positive image of Lino Lakes at the major gateway
to the city.
• Accomplishes a major objective of the Comprehensive Plan and the
City Council.
• Improves connections to the regional park trail system.
• PUBLIC ASSISTANCE: $5.55 Million
• $3.1 million to assist with land write down and site preparation.
• $2.4 million for public improvements to Lake Drive.
SOURCES OF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
• $4,985,999 TIF
• $450,000 Met Council grant that has been awarded (Potential
additional grant could offset other sources)
•
• $116,000 other sources
DEVELOPER COSTS AFTER ASSISTANCE
• $2.2 million purchase of city owned land
• $3 million towards purchase of sandblasting site
• $5.4 million assessments for public improvements
• $3.6 million soft costs and site prep
SUMMARY
Staff has worked with the developer for the past 1% years to develop a project
that best meets the goals for the downtown development. The project redevelops
• the sandblasting site and establishes a gateway to the city. The city is paid
market value for its land and maximizes its value. Rental, senior and affordable
housing is developed on a site that has more strict design standards than the
rest of the city. The project provides a source of revenue to improve Lake Drive
•
and the interchange, and extends roads and utilities that are needed to
accommodate the YMCA.
Steve Bubui from Kennedy & Graven, the city's tax increment financing attorney
on the project, has been working on the draft Redevelopment Contract for your
consideration tonight. After taking any additional public comment, staff
recommends the council close the public hearing.
RECOMMENDATION:
Reopen the public hearing.
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -139
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
BETWEEN THE LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
THE CITY OF LINO LAKES AND LEGACY HOLDINGS/LINO LAKES, LLC
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council ( "Council ") of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
( "City ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority ( "Authority ") administers
Development District No. 1 (the "Project)" pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to
469.134 ( "Development District Act ").
1.02. The Authority, the City and Legacy Holdings/Lino Lakes, LLC (the "Developer ")
have proposed to enter into a into a Contract for Private Development (the "Contract "), setting forth
the terms and conditions of redevelopment of certain property within the Project, referred to
generally as the Legacy at Woods Edge Project.
1.03. The Council has reviewed the Contract and fords that the execution thereof and
performance of the City's obligations thereunder are in the best interest of the City and its residents.
Section 2. City Approval; Further Proceedings.
2.01. The Contract as presented to the Council is hereby in all respects approved, subject
to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the
Mayor and City Administrator, provided that execution of the documents by such officials shall be
conclusive evidence of approval.
2.02. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the
City the Contract and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the City, and to
carry out, on behalf of the City its obligations thereunder.
SJB- 253373v1
LN 140 -80
-76-
•
•
Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this of
, 2004.
Al 1'EST:
City Clerk
SJB- 253373v1
LN140 -80
- 7 7 -
Mayor
•
LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER
Objectives
Definition of a Town Center :
• A 75 -acre complex of buildings in a controlled setting
• An integrated mix of uses that responds to residents' needs
• A gathering place that creates a sense of community, civic identity and pride
• A place that defines the unique character of the community
• An economic development initiative to increase the value of the commercial tax
base
• Provides the impetus for physical connectivity of the four quadrants of the
interchange
• An environmentally sustainable community through the use of technology,
materials, systems, and maintenance
The Town Center's design criteria includes:
• Integrated uses that provide a total human experience
• Pedestrian scale
• Streets that are friendly to both pedestrians and cars
• Consolidated parking set behind the buildings
• Architectural codes that allow different architectural expressions, but produce a
consistent character that will withstand the test of time
• A public gathering place
• A visible symbol that announces the site
• Structures not more than four stories.hiRh
• A variety of housing types and cost, including housing above retail, that meets
ADA requirements
• A physical sense of neighborhood
• Physical links of the four quadrants of the interchange
• Links to the surrounding community
• A police station that is visible and has easy access to surrounding community
•
• Protection of most valuable hardwoods on public site
• Maintenance of perpetual easements on the public site
• Landscaping treated as a natural extension of the regional park reserve
• Connected trail system with the regional park reserve
•
•
•
( E).
SUMMARY
OF
CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVEOPMENT
BETWEEN
LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
CITY OF LINO LAKES,
AND
LEGACY HOLDINGS/LINO LAKES, LLC
Land Acquisition/Platting /Zoning.
A. The "City Parcel" is the parcel now owned by the City, located outside the 1'l1. '
District. The "Ilk Parcel" is the parcel now owned by the Taggs, located within the l'1F
District. Together, these parcels are referred to as the "Development Property."
B. Developer will acquire the City Parcel (under a separate purchase agreement with
the City); and Developer will acquire the 11F' Parcel from the Taggs (under an existing
purchase agreement). Developer indemnifies the City and EDA for any claim related to
relocation benefits in connection with TIF Parcel.
C. Developer must obtain final plat and PUD approval consistent with a Master Site
Plan. In connection those actions, the City and Developer will enter into a "Planning
Contract" that addresses typical planning and land use requirements.
II. Direct Financial Assistance.
A. The EDA will provide a total of $2.7 million in assistance toward acquisition of the
Parcel. Up to $1.7 million will be in the form of an interfund loan, and $1 million will
be in the form of a tax increment revenue note (referred to as the `Note "). In addition, the
City will provide $450,000 from Met Council grant funds for site work.
B. Interfund Loan:
1. The City will provide up to $1,700,000 from sale of the City Parcel to fund
an interfund loan. If the City receives additional Met Council grant money, those funds will
be used to reduce the amount of the interfund loan.
2. The interfund loan (and any grant monies) will be place in escrow when
these conditions have been met:
SJB- 254082v1
LN140 -80
• Closing on the TIF Parcel
• All buildings on Parcel have been demolished.
• Billboard on l'lr' Parcel has been removed
• Final plat for townhome development has been approved.
- 8 0 -
• 3. The interfund loan (and any grant monies) will be disbursed from the escrow
when these conditions are met:
•
• City has issued the first building permit in the townhome
development
• EDA and Developer have entered into Assessment Agreements
setting minimum market value sufficient to create enough increment
to pay the interfund loan (and TIF Bonds, if they have been issued at
the time).
If these conditions are not met within two years after funding the escrow, the monies
are released back to the EDA.
4. The EDA will approve an interfund loan resolution that specifies a payment
schedule, with interest set at the maximum rate permitted by statute (currently, 4 %; the rate
changes annually).
C. TIF Note.
1. The TIF Note will be issued at closing on acquisition of the TIF Parcel. The
initial principal amount will be $1 million, with interest at 6 %.
2. The 111- Note will be paid solely from 90% of the tax increment generated
by the property in the "1T1+' District. This note is always subordinate to the TIF Bonds
(described in part IV below), and is subordinate to the interfund loan as well until
Assessment Agreements have been signed that produce enough increment to pay the TIF
Bonds, the interfund loan, and the TIF Note. From then on, the interfund loan and the
Note are on "parity" (which means increment is applied based on the relative outstanding
amounts of those obligations).
3. If the total special assessments on the Development Property are less than
$5,382,565, the Note will be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis.
D. Met Council Grant. The City will disburse grant funds for site work on the TIF
Parcel, subject to all the terms and conditions of the grant agreement between the City and
the Met Council.
E. The Developer must pay the City and EDA's out of pocket costs in connection with
this project.
F. The financial assistance is exempt from statutory business subsidy law requirements,
because the Developers investment in land and site improvements will exceed 70% of the
current market value of the TIF Parcel.
SJB- 250856v7
CL205 -23
-81-
•
III. Minimum Improvements and Additional Improvements.
A. Generally, the Developer is required to develop the entire Development Property
according to a specified phasing schedule. Improvements built within the TIF District are
referred to as the "Minimum Improvements," and the improvements built outside the 'I'lli'
District are referred to as the "Additional Improvements."
B. The Minimum Improvements consist of a "Commercial Component," a "Rental
Housing Component," and an "Owner- Occupied Housing Component." The required
construction schedule for these components is summarized as follows:
Commercial Component: 47,200 square feet by the end of 2006; additional
52,200 square feet by the end of 2007; additional 10,000 square feet by the end of 2008; and
additional 5,000 square feet by the end of 2009.
Rental Housing Component: 16 units by the end of 2005; additional 32 units by the
end of 2006; and additional 16 units by the end of 2007.
Owner- Occupied Housing Component: 41 units by the end of 2005; additional 41
units in each of the years 2006, 2007 and 2008.
C. The Additional Improvement requirements and phasing schedule to be determined.
[Note: these improvements do not generate tax increment.] See part D, below for discussion
of particular covenants that may apply to the Additional Improvements.
D. Covenants regarding housing types.
1. At least 60 percent of all housing units (inside and outside the "1 Distsrict
combined) must be owner- occupied.
2. At 60 housing units (inside and outside the TIF District combined) must be
senior, whether owner occupied or rental. If owner - occupied, they may be the same
units that are "affordable," as described below.
3. At least 90 units (inside and outside the TIF District combined) must be
affordable as described in this paragraph.
• At least 60 units must be rental units that meet the income and rent
limits for federal tax credits (generally, 40% of the units at 60% of
median income, or 20% at 50 %).
• At least 30 units must be owner - occupied, sold at a purchase price,
and to initial buyers, that meet the Met Council price and income
limitations for affordable owner- occupied housing.
E. Assessment Agreements. By at least the required dates for completion of each
component of the Minimum Improvements described in part B above, the Developer must
SJB- 250856v7
CL205 -23
_82-
•
•
enter into Assessment Agreements that set a specified minimum market value for the
component or portion thereof. Assessment Agreements at specified levels must in any case
be in effect before the interfund loan is disbursed (See Part II.B above) and before TIF
Bonds are issued (See Part III.0 below)
IV. Public Improvements.
A. The City will construct all streets, sewer, water, stormsewer and related
infrastructure to serve the entire Development Property (referred to as the "Public
Improvements "). The City will also construct improvements to the Lake Drive/I -35
intersection (referred to as the "Lake Drive Improvements ").
B. The City will assess the Development Property for most of the cost of the Public
Improvements, up to a maximum of $5,382,865. Park dedication fees and a small amount
of City utility funds will also be used.
C. The City will fmance the Lake Drive Improvements mostly through issuance of
general obligation tax increment bonds (the "TIF Bonds "). The City is not required to issue
the TIF Bonds and begin the Lake Drive Improvements until the Developer has signed
Assessment Agreements that provide sufficient tax increment to pay both the TIF Bonds and
the interfund loan (described in Part II above). As noted above, the "i'it' Bonds have the first
claim on all tax increment.
V. Transfer/Partners.
The Developer may not assign or other transfer its rights and obligations under Contract
without the EDA's prior consent in writing. However, it is anticipated that the Developer
will sell portions of the Development Property to subdevelopers (each a "Subdeveloper ")
and transfer certain rights and obligations under the Contract to those parties to undertake
certain portions of the project. The EDA must approve the Subdeveloper and the terms of
the transfer in writing in each such case. This approval does not apply for any transfer to an
affiliate of the Developer.
VI. Defaults.
If Developer defaults (for example, fails to complete a component of the Minimum
Improvements as scheduled), the EDA may withhold payments under the Note. If property
has been transferred to a Subdeveloper, the required improvements will be allocated to that
Subdeveloper, and the EDA may withhold increment only from the parcel that is in default.
However, default in the overall required housing types (described in Part III.D) will allow
withholding of increment from the entire TIF District.
SJB- 250856v7
CL205 -23
a
-83-
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
ACTION REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA ITEM 6F
Michael Grochala
October 12, 2004
Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -146
Requesting Mn /DOT Municipal Agreement
Funding for Lake Drive /I -35W Improvements
Simple Majority
The Lake Drive /1 -35W interchange currently experiences severe backups at the off
ramps due to operational issues with the stop - controlled intersections. Additionally, the
south ramps are not aligned across from one another and uncontrolled private accesses
exist immediately south of the ramps. The poor function of the interchange has been
documented in correspondence between the City, Mn /DOT and Metropolitan Council
over the last 8 to 10 years.
As part of the proposed Legacy at Woods Edge project, a traffic analysis and
preliminary design for Lake Drive were completed that identified the roadway
improvements necessary to improve existing conditions and accommodate the
proposed development. The estimated cost of improvements to Lake Drive including
signalization and ramp realignment is approximately $2,400,000.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) offers a municipal agreement
program, which provides funding for city initiated projects. The program offers up to
$500,000 for construction purposes and a pro -rated share of funding for construction
engineering. Following discussions with Mn /DOT and Anoka County, City staff is of the
opinion that the project has a high potential for funding. The application deadline is
Friday, October 15th. Based on eligible funding items, staff is proposing to request
$540,000 from the municipal agreement program for state fiscal year 2006 (July 2005 to
June 2006).
Award of the funding, which is typically made in January or February, provides the City
with additional flexibility regarding funding of Lake Drive improvements. The dollars
could be used to offset the proposed city share of "interim improvements" or could be
rolled into the funding package for an overall interchange improvement project.
•
•
•
City Council
Lake Drive/I -35W Coop Au.
October 12, 2004
RECOMMENDATION
The attached resolution formally requests consideration for state funding from the
Municipal Agreement Program. Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 04-
146.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 04 -146
•
City Council
Lake Drive /I -35W Coop Ate-.
October 12, 2004
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -146
RESOLUTION REQUESTING FUNDING FROM THE
MINNESOTA DEPARMENT OF TRANPORTATION THROUGH THE
MUNICIPAL AGREEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006
(CSAH 23/I -35W INTERCHANGE)
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes finds, as previously documented by Mn /DOT, that
the intersection of Lake Drive and 1 -35 W along with the adjacent approaches to and
departures from the attendant roadways are in need of substantial changes to abate
congestion and reduce accidents due to current traffic volumes; and
WHEREAS, the interchange currently experiences severe backups at the off ramps due
to operational issues with the stop controlled intersections; and
WHEREAS, the south ramps are not aligned across from one another and uncontrolled
private accesses exist immediately south of the ramps; and
• WHEREAS, the City Council has initiated engineering studies to identify corrective
measures to better manage the existing problem; and
WHERAS, the City is committed to constructing the project if it is chosen for the
Municipal Agreement Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes,
Anoka County, Minnesota on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes does hereby request
funding from the Minnesota Department of Transportation through its Municipal
Agreement Program for Fiscal Year 2006.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of October 2004.
Ann Blair, f_ity Clerk
J
•
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
ACTION REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA ITEM 6G
Michael Grochala
October 12, 2004
Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -147
Authorizing Commencement of Environmental
Review Study for the I -35E Corridor
Simple Majority
The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the I -35E corridor area for a variety of land uses
including low, medium and high density residential, commercial, industrial and rural and
uses. Recently approved, as well as proposed, development projects along this
corridor have initiated discussions regarding transportation, stormwater management,
land use compatibility and other development related impacts. It is anticipated that
development interests along the corridor will continue to increase as transportation
infrastructure is improved and surrounding communities continue to grow at their
current pace.
The proposed Hardwood Creek development, located northwest of the Main Street/1-
35E interchange is one example. While this proposed 360 acre development provides
an opportunity to master plan a large area, the site is relatively small when compared to
the long term development potential of the I -35E corridor. While the proposal will likely
require some level of environmental review, it is staff's opinion that the City would
benefit from a more comprehensive examination of the surrounding area.
The City Council goals, adopted in June of 2004, included the direction to begin Master
Planning of the ! -35E corridor. These goals are also supported by the Economic
Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) Action Plan identifying the need to master
plan the corridor. In conjunction with these, staff has viewed the Hardwood Creek
development as an opportunity to leverage public and private dollars to complete a
more comprehensive study of the corridor area.
City staff has received a prvEwa1 from D ahnI gren , vhardl "v & Uban , Inc. (DSU), a
leading planning and landscape architecture firm in the state, to complete an Alternative
Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the proposed area along the eastern side of the
city encompassing approximately 4,000 acres. The geographic area was based on
identified growth areas, rural land uses, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park, and
the 1 -35E, 1 -35W and County Road 14 transportation corridors.
The AUAR process gives the City the opportunity to assess the impact of potential
•
•
City Council
I -35E Corridor AUAR Study
October 12, 2004
development on the area's natural resources prior to receiving and considering
development proposals for approval. A single AUAR process can address both public
infrastructure construction scheduled for the near future as well as the ensuing
residential, commercial and light industrial development slated for later years. By
examining multiple development scenarios throughout the AUAR process, the City is
able to evaluate how much development can be accommodated in an area without
significant environmental impacts.
The DSU proposal includes the assistance of subconsultants for specific areas of
expertise including the following:
1. Applied Ecological Services, Inc. (AES). AES was the co- author with Brauer
and Associates of the City's Handbook for Environmental Planning and
Conservation Development. They will be responsible for the natural
resources, ecological and stormwater management review.
2. URS Corp. URS is currently developing the Anoka County transportation
model. URS will be handling the traffic modeling for the review.
3. TKDA. TKDA is the city's engineering consultant and will be handling sanitary
sewer and water components of the study.
4. 106 Group. The 106 Group will be performing the Cultural Resources
component.
The AUAR process is proposed to be completed within nine months of the authorization
to proceed. A key element of the process is the establishment of an Advisory Panel
consisting of representatives from the Planning & Zoning Board, Environmental Board,
EDAC, Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County, property owners, surrounding
communities, and representatives from other identified key groups and agencies. The
process is designed to empower and support the City Council in making informed
decisions at every key stage of the project.
The estimated contract price for the AUAR is $296,400 plus $8,000 to $10,000 in
expenses mostly attributable to printing costs associated with the final document. The
project is proposed to be funded by a yet to be established environmental review area
charge collected in conjunction with development. Interim financing will be provided
through the City's Trunk Utility Fund and Stormwater Management Fund. The City is
requesting a no interest loan from Metropolitan Council in the amount $75,000 to assist
with the interim financing. We are also expecting a contribution from Anoka County as
well as the Hardwood Creek developer.
RECOMMENDATION
From a planning perspective, the AUAR process is an excellent opportunity to evaluate
cumulative development impacts. It is a very proactive approach to development, which
provides the community with a better opportunity, to plan for development rather than
react to it.
•
•
•
City Council
I -35E Corridor AUAR Study
October 12, 2004
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 04 -147
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 04 -147
2. Project Area Map
3. Project Timeline
•
City Council
I -35E Corridor AUAR Study
October 12, 2004
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -147
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COMMENCEMENT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW STUDY FOR THE NORTHEAST PORTION OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES
WHEREAS,
A. The northeast portion of the City of Lino Lakes ( "Subject Property ") includes
identified growth areas, rural land uses, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional
Park Reserve, and the 1 -35 E, 1 -35 W, and County Road 14 transportation
corridors. The Subject Property area is depicted on the attached Exhibit A; and,
B. The development of the Subject Property will require environmental review in
accordance with the Minnesota Environmental Review Program; and,
C. The Minnesota Environmental Review Program rules provide for an Alternative
Urban Areawide Review ( "AUAR "); and,
D. The AUAR process give the City the opportunity to assess the impact of potential
development on the area's natural resources prior to receiving and considering
development proposals for approval. A single AUAR process can address both
public infrastructure construction scheduled for the near future as well as the
ensuing residential, commercial, and Tight industrial development slated for later
years. By examining multiple development scenarios through the AUAR
process, the City is able to evaluate how much development can be
accommodated in an area without significant environmental impacts; and,
E. An Advisory Panel consisting of representatives from the Planning & Zoning
Board, Environmental Board, Park Board, Economic Development Advisory
Committee, Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County, property owners,
surrounding communities, and representatives from other identified key groups
and agencies will review background studies and development scenario
alternatives and make recommendations to the City Council. The City Council
will therefore have input from these groups before completing its formal review
and making decisions.
F. The anticipated nature and intensity of development shall be determined by the
City Council after background studies are completed and a preferred
development scenario is identified; and,
G. In accordance with Minnesota Rules, the City Council shall order the preparation
of the AUAR document at such time as the anticipated nature and intensity of
development is determined; and,
•
•
•
City Council
I -35E Corridor AUAR Study
October 12, 2004
H. DSU, Inc. and its agents have submitted a proposal and contract to provide
services to assist the City of Lino Lakes in determining a preferred development
scenario and preparing an AUAR document.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,
1. That the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the
proposal and contract with DSU and its agents to provide professional
services for determining a preferred development scenario and preparing
an AUAR document.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of October 2004.
Ann Blair, City Clerk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
:EO LAND
'VEY NO 22
dpo, PN 'IMO
4,4ftrialsrfila ..... FM%
-0,14 coos to rigo 4 IA
\� �, ®. °El g
0111 i ,�.�
ir.- I .off
.ai I` i -, i'6` -tie n Ti
Centerville Lake
-92 -
A:
EL
SEPTEMBER 2004
- 9 3 -
Communications
WORK PROGRAM AND SCHEDULE
•
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
ACTION REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA ITEM 6H
Michael Grochala
October 12, 2004
Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -150
Authorizing Transfer of Otter Lake Rd ROW to
Anoka County.
Simple Majority
In 1998 the City entered into a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with Anoka County to
construct the realigned Otter Lake Road through the Clearwater Creek Development
Center. As set forth in the JPA the City acquired the right -of -way and constructed the
project. Anoka County, in return, agreed to $678,348 in cost sharing for the project.
Additionally, under the terms of the agreement, upon completion of the project the new
alignment would be transferred to Anoka County and the old alignment (Otter Lake
Service Road) would be transferred to the city.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Attorney has drafted the necessary quitclaim deed to convey the right -of -way
to Anoka County. Since the right -of -way lies within a Charter Exempt area the City can
transfer the property by resolution.
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 04 -150
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 04 -150
2. General Location Map
•
•
City Council
Otter Lake Road ROW transfer
October 12, 2004
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 04 -150
AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF CITY STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY TO
ANOKA COUNTY (OTTER LAKE ROAD) AND ACCEPTING RIGHT -OF -WAY
FROM ANOKA COUNTY (OTTER LAKE SERVICE ROAD)
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes and Anoka County entered into a Joint Powers
Agreement executed by the City on July 7, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the parties to the agreement mutually agreed that Otter Lake Road should
continue to be on the County System; and
WHEREAS, the parties to the agreement mutually. agreed that after construction of the
realigned Otter Lake Road it will be mutually desirable to turn over the existing Otter
Lake Road between the realignment and Main Street to the City; and
WHEREAS, Section IX.0 of the Joint Powers Agreement stipulates that the both the
County and City agree to pass the necessary resolutions to transfer the roadways and
re- establish the County designations on the routes
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes,
Anoka County, Minnesota authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the deed to
transfer the realigned Otter Lake Road right -of -way to Anoka County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City hereby accepts the transfer of right -of -way
for the former alignment of Otter Lake Road (Otter Lake Service Road) to the City of
Lino Lakes.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of October 2004.
Ann Biair, City Cierk
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
Or7-44-4° IA) /F;7
eeer dr7rcc, p 4
"I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land
Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Dated this our day of Ay1v / 2004 Minnesota License No
BY
•
E. G. RUD 4 SONS, ING
LAND SURVEYORS
9180 LEXINGTON AVE. ND.
CIRCLE PINES, MINNESOTA
55014 -3625
TEL. ("163)-186 -5556
INTERSTATE
•
•
q PHELFfs._
M.Abw I w.f. xw.. M. ✓�.
• i r.•,f el JO)
zrzT.J� —
RDAa 1�1 r...�.smm472
(()
airwe ,.
•
•
•
•
D
ItJ .
•
t '
P.�.�_:
: r\ is
z
z
}
(A)
of
iR
(6)
iaESc,P /i TVGrV /'&1.0 W49
A strip of land 100 feet in width over and across the Southeast Quarter and over
the South Half of the Northeast Quarter all in Section 24, Township 31, Range 22.
Anoka County, Minnesota.
The centerline of said strip is described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 24;
thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 34 minutes 15 seconds East
along the west line of said Southeast Quarter 484.39 feet; thence northeasterly
623.06 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of
. 660.00 feet "" ^ ^ °ntral angle of 54 degrees 05 minutes 21 seconds; thence North
54 degrees - 9 6 -tes 37 seconds East and tangent to said curve 960.58 feet;
thence northerly 620.96 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west having a
N
J
0