The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/20/2004 Council PacketEXPANDED AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, December 20, 2004 Council Chambers EDA Meeting, 5:45 p.m. (5:48 P.M.) Council Chambers City Council meeting 6:00 p.m.* (6:10 P.M.) (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) *Please note time change Open Mike Call to Order and Roll Call -- ALL PRESENT. Pledge of Allegiance Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items THERE WERE NO CHANGES TO THE AGENDA DURING SETTING OF THE AGENDA. (DURING DELIBERATIONS FOR ITEM 6C, CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-201, RELATING TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 1 -11, COUNCIL AMENDED THE AGENDA TO REMOVE THAT ITEM, AT THE REQUEST OF STAFF.) 1. Consent Agenda - A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) December 20, 2004 (Check No. 72572 through 72750 in the amount of $381,408.68). Pg. 4 -11 ii) Centennial Fire District Check Register (to follow) Pg. 12 B) Consideration of Resolution 04 -184 Authorizing The Transfer Of Funds From The Area And Unit Fund To The 1996A G.O. Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund Pg. 13 -14 C) Consideration of Resolution 04 -185 Authorizing The Transfer Of Funds From The Area And Unit Fund To The Water Operating Fund For Payment Of 1996B G.O. Water Revenue Bond Pg. 15 -16 Page 1 EXPANDED AGENDA D) Consideration of Resolution 04 -186 Authorizing The Transfer Of Funds From The Area And Unit Fund To The 1998A G.O. Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund Pg. 17 -18 E) Consideration of Resolution 04 -187 Authorizing The Transfer Of Funds From The Area And Unit Fund To The 1999A G.O. Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund Pg. 19 -20 F) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -188 Authorizing the Closing of 1996A Debt Service Fund Pg. 21 -22 G) Consideration of Resolution 04 -193 Authorizing Fund Transfers to and the Closing of the 1997 and 1998 Construction Funds Pg. 23 -24 H) Consideration of Resolution 04 -194 Amending the 2004 General Operating Budget Pg. 25-27 I) Consider minutes of December 8, 2004 Council Work Session MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek A) Consideration of Resolution 04 -189 Adopting the 2004 Tax Levy Collectible in 2005 Pg. 28-29 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04- 189 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. VOTE: THREE AYES, TWO NAYS. THE MOTION PASSED. COUNCILMEMBERS BERGESON, STOLTZ AND REINERT VOTED AYE. COUNCILMEMBERS CARLSON AND DAHL VOTED NAY. B) Consideration of Resolution 04 -190 Adopting the 2005 General Operating Budget Pg. 30 -31 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04- 190 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. VOTE: THREE AYES, TWO NAYS. THE MOTION PASSED. COUNCILMEMBERS BERGESON, STOLTZ AND REINERT VOTED AYE. COUNCILMEMBERS CARLSON AND DAHL VOTED NAY. Page 2 EXPANDED AGENDA FOLLOWING CONSIDERATION OF ITEM 2B, COUNCILMEMBER STOLTZ LEFT THE COUNCIL MEETING. C) Consideration of Resolution 04 -191 Adopting the 2005 Water and Sewer Operating Budget Pg. 32 -33 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04- 191, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. D) Consideration of Resolution 04 -192 Adopting the 2005 Recreation Fund Budget Pg. 34 -35 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER REINERT, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-192, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consider request for leave of absence (LLPD dept. report) MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, APPROVING THE REQUEST FOR A LEAVE OF ABSENCE FOR OFFICER HAGER AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. A) Consider Appointment to Circle Pines Utility Commission (moved to Jan. 10 agenda) 4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) None. 5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A) None. 6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala A) Public Hearing, Consider 1St Reading of Ordinance 03 -04, Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements and Accepting New Easements, Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Brook Peninsula, Jim Studenski (Continue Public Hearing to January 24, 2005 City Council Meeting) Pg. 37 Page 3 EXPANDED AGENDA MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE JANUARY 24, 2005 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. B) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -200, Decertifying Tax Increment Financing District 1 -8, Mary Divine Pg. 38 -40 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04 -200, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. C) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -201, Modifying Tax Increment Financing District 1 -11, Mary Divine Pg. 41 -44 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, TO TABLE THIS ITEM. VOTE: TWO AYES, ONE NAY. THE MOTION FAILED. COUNCILMEMBERS CARLSON AND DAHL VOTED AYE. MAYOR BERGESON VOTED NAY. STAFF REQUESTED THAT THIS ITEM BE WITHDRAWN FROM THE AGENDA. MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, TO AMEND THE AGENDA, REMOVING ITEM 6C. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. D) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -197, Approving Change Order No. 2 and Payment Request No. 4, Holly Drive Improvements Project, Jim Studenski Pg. 45 -52 MOTION BY MAYOR BERGESON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04 -197, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. E) Consideration of Resolution No. 198, Approving Final Payment, Black Duck Pumping Station, Jim Studenski Pg. 53 -58 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-198, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. F) Consideration of Resolution No. 199, Authorizing Soil Borings, Well No. 5, Jim Studenski Pg. 59 -61 MOTION BY MAYOR BERGESON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, TABLING THIS ITEM UNTIL THE JANUARY 10, 2004 COUNCIL MEETING. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Page 4 EXPANDED AGENDA G) Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -202 Approving Legacy at Wood's Edge Subdivision / PUD Contract MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 04-202, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. Unfinished Business A) None. 8. New Business A) None. 9. Community Calendar, December 21, 2004 through January 10, 2005: A) City Hall Closed, Friday, December 24, 2004 B) City Hall Closed, Monday, December 27, 2004 C) City Hall Closed, Friday, December 31, 2004 D) City Hall Closed, Monday, January 3, 2005 E) Park Board Meeting, Tuesday, January 4, 2004, 6:30 p.m. F) Council Work Session, Wednesday, January 5, 2004, 5:30 p.m. G) City Council Meeting, Monday, January 10, 2004, 6:30 p.m. 10. Adjourn MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER DAHL, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:50 P.M. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Revised 01/01/04 AJB 3:19 p.m. Page 5 AMENDED AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY DECEMBER 20, 2004 5:45 P.M. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration of Minutes of September 27, 2004 3. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -04 Terminating Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -8 and Directing the Decertification by the County Auditor 4. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -05 Approving Modification of Tax Increment Financing District Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11. 5. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -06 Awarding the Sale of, and Providing the form, terms, covenants and directions for the Issuance of its $1,000,000 Taxable Tax Increment Revenue Note, Series 2004 6. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -07 Authorizing Internal Loan in Connection with Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11 7. Adjourn DATE MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT DRAFT CITY OF LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES : September 27, 2004 : J. Bergeson, D. Carlson, C. Dahl, J. Reinert, D. Stoltz : None : Gordon Heitke, Mary Divine, Michael Grochala and Bill Hawkins CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 23, 2004 EDA Member Bergeson moved to approve the minutes of the February 23, 2004 EDA Meeting. EDA Member Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF SALE OF PROPERTY TO E.G. RUD & SONS LAND SURVEYORS A. Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -02 Authorizing the Sale of Property. Ms. Divine summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff is recommending approval. President Reinert opened the public hearing at 6:12 p.m. The EDA asked about access to the property, which Ms. Divine explained comes from Hodgson Road and also a left turn lane that goes to the Shaw Property, where access would have to be granted. EDA Member Carlson expressed concern about the amount of lakeshore, and if the City was getting the full value for the property. She indicated it is really six acres of property, even if it is not all buildable land. She questioned why the City would not try to keep land along the lake since they are not being paid for it anyway. She noted it is a good company that will provide a quality building, but she is concerned they are missing an opportunity for public ownership of lakeshore at a time when they are looking to purchase lakeshore. Staff explained how the piece of property came to be, noting it was pieced together from several other situations. The utility easement on the property was clarified, as well as the fact that that easement is a power company easement and cannot be vacated. Ms. Divine clarified the appraisal is based on the full amount of acreage and on market value, not on the buildable portion of land. She indicated while this property was not advertised for sale because Staff was working on clearing up title issues, they have had people come in and ask about it, and when the property was appraised they received this full market value offer, which they brought to the EDA. She indicated if there were going to turn down this offer and put it on the market they would have to make the decision to sell it for more than the appraised value. EDA MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 DRAFT 46 Jason Rud, Rud and Sons gave the history of the company, noting they are anxious to move their 47 offices to this property in Lino Lakes. He noted they have one tenant, who is a civil engineer that will 48 move with them, and gave a brief description of the type of building they would envision. 49 50 President Reinert closed the public hearing at 6:31 p.m. 51 52 City Attorney Hawkins noted a correction to the resolution, the second to the last paragraph, which 53 should read `Staff and City Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to prepare a purchase 54 agreement with the Buyer for the purchase of the property for the amount of $300,000.' 55 56 EDA Member Bergeson stated he would support this action, and thinks Staff has negotiated in good 57 faith. He indicated this is not necessarily a highly saleable parcel, and he thinks the use is ideal. He 58 does not want a high traffic user close to the corner. 59 60 EDA Member Dahl disagreed, indicating she feels this is a highly prized corner as well as being 61 lakeshore. She did agree Staff did a good job bringing this offer. 62 63 Community Development Director Grochala offered that the plat includes a portion of the lake, so 64 nearly half of the six acres is lake, and the remaining land is further encumbered with easements. He 65 stated after applying setbacks, the area you could actually place a building on is about a half acre 66 parcel, therefore the appraiser averaged out the square footage values and came up with an appraisal 67 of $300,000. He noted they are getting more out of this parcel than Staff thought possible. 68 69 EDA Member Stoltz expressed his support for the sale and for Staff's process for determining fair 70 market value. He added this parcel has been dormant on the tax rolls so the longer the City delays the 71 sale the longer the lack of income will continue. He agreed it is a gateway to the community, and 72 believes the Rud and Sons building would be a great addition to the community. 73 74 EDA Member Carlson noted the ponding and following easement agreement is important to her, and 75 she thinks $300,000 is an appropriate bid, so she will support. 76 77 President Reinert echoed the comments that this is a good use of land. He indicated he agrees with 78 EDA Member Carlson that they should save lakeshore when they can, but would like to see it be 79 useable lakeshore and not just add maintenance for the City. 80 81 EDA Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 04 -02 authorizing the sale of property at the 82 northeast corner of Highway 23 and Highway 49, with the correction noted by City Attorney 83 Hawkins. EDA Member Stoltz seconded the motion. 84 85 Motion carried unanimously. 86 87 ADJOURNMENT 88 89 There being no further business, EDA Member Carlson moved to adjourn. EDA Member Bergeson 90 seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. 2 EDA MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 DRAFT 91 92 Meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. 93 94 Transcribed by: 95 Karen Bucklen 96 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 97 3 AGENDA ITEM 3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 12/20/04 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -04 Terminating Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -8 and Directing Decertification by the County Auditor VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: TIF District No. 1 -8 was created by the Economic Development Authority on April 28, 1997. The establishment of this 25 -year Redevelopment District was in response to several areas within the city that met the criteria for redevelopment and had potential for redevelopment. Of the three sites within the district, only one has redeveloped. Fairview Healthcare was provided with assistance to redevelop the former Gethsemane Church site on the southwest corner of the 35W /Lake Drive and construct its clinic. All obligations under the EDA's agreement to Fairview have been met. The tax capacity generated by Fairview Clinic is approximately $23,000 and will now be on the tax roles. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -04 Terminating TIF District No. 1 -8 2. Do not terminate the district. 3. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 04 -04 TERMINATING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1 -8 AND DIRECTING DECERTIFICATION THEREOF BY THE COUNTY AUDITOR WHEREAS, by adoption of a resolution April 28, 1997, the Economic Development Authority of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "Authority ") has heretofore created Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -8 (the "District "), located within Municipal Development District No. 1, and has approved a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan "), as amended, for the District to provide assistance to the Fairview Healthcare Clinic project; and WHEREAS, the County Auditor of Anoka County has certified the original net tax capacity and the original local tax rate of the District pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177; and WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, all of the projects have been completed, all obligations to which tax increment from the District has been pledged have been paid in full or defeased, and the Authority has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to terminate and decertify the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that (i) the District is hereby terminated and (ii) the Clerk - Administrator shall provide a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Anoka County so that the District may be decertified on the books and records of the County Auditor with no further tax increment from the District being remitted to the City. Adopted: December 20, 2004. President ATTEST: Executive Director LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 04 -05 RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 -11 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 03 -11 approved November 24, 2003, the Economic Development Authority (the "Authority ") for the City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") approved the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan ") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11 (the "TIF District "), pursuant to and in conformity with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 through 469.1081 (the "EDA Act ") and Sections 469.174 to 469.179 (the "TIF Act "); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 03 -209 approved November 24, 2003, the City Council of the City, after a duly notice public hearing, approved the Plan for the TIF District; and WHEREAS, since that time the City and Authority have diligently worked to negotiate a development agreement regarding the TIF District, and determined to postpone filing the TIF District for certification pending completion of such negotiations; and WHEREAS, on October 12, 2004, the City and Authority each approved a Contract for Private Development between the City, Authority and Legacy Holdings /Lino Lakes LLC (the "Contract "); and WHEREAS, in reviewing the development contemplated in the Contract, the AUTHORITY has determined that Parcel No. 17- 31 -22 -12 -0005 (the "Parcel ") should be eliminated from the TIF District; and WHEREAS, under Section 469.175, subd. 4 of the TIF Act, the Authority may modify the Plan for the TIF District without the notice and hearings required for a new district, if the only change is to eliminate parcels from the TIF District, and the current net tax capacity of those parcels equals for exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the district's original net tax capacity; and WHEREAS, the TIF District has not yet been filed for certification, but the City expects to file for certification by the end of December, 2004, in which event the original net tax capacity for all parcels in the TIF District will be the tax capacity as of January 2, 2004 (for taxes payable in 2005); and SJB- 256717v1 LN 140 -80 WHEREAS, the Parcel to be eliminated does not yet have an original net tax capacity, so at the time the TIF District is filed for certification, the boundaries of the district will exclude the Parcel; and WHEREAS, the Authority has determined to modify the Plan, prior to tiling for certification, in order to eliminate the Parcel; and WHEREAS, elimination of the Parcel does not affect or impair the findings made by the City Council, upon approval of the Plan, that the TIF District is a redevelopment district under the TIF Act. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority of the City of Lino Lakes as follows: 1. The administrative modification to the Plan, eliminating the Parcel, is hereby approved in substantially the form on file in City Hall. 2. Upon approval of the modification to the Plan by the City Council, the Community Development Director is authorized to forward a copy of the modified Plan to the Department of Revenue pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, subd.4a. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to forward a copy of the Plan to Anoka County and request that the Auditor certify the original tax capacity of the TIF District, as modified, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 469.177. DATED: December 20, 2004 President ATTEST: Executive Director SJB- 240584v1 LN 140 -80 2 STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: AGENDA ITEM 4 Mary Alice Divine 12/20/04 Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -05 Approving modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11 3/5 BACKGROUND: The Economic Development Authority created TIF District No. 1 -11 on November 24, 2003. The establishment of this 25 -year Redevelopment District was intended to provide a source of revenue for development of the city's downtown area, known as Woods Edge, and is comprised mainly of the Arctic Sandblasting site and the Tagg home. In working with the Hartford Group and the YMCA on site planning for Woods Edge, a more functional redesign of the YMCA site was completed to better serve the entire development. However, the Tagg home site (PIN 17- 31- 22 -12- 0005) is now a part of the YMCA site and no longer a part of the Woods Edge Planned Unit Development TIF District 1- 11will be certified with Anoka County before year -end. This resolution removes the Tagg home parcel from the district before certification. That way, no parcel will be developed that is partly inside and partly outside a TIF District. Elimination of the parcel and delay in certification do not materially change the impacts and TIF estimates in the plan. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -05 Modifying TIF District No. 1 -11 2. Do not modify the district. 3. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 (Legacy at Woods Edge Project) Dated: November 24, 2003 Original Approved: November 24, 2003 Administrative Modification Approved: December 20, 2004 Prepared by: SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED 85 E. Seventh Place, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55101 -2887 (651) 223 -3000 WWW. SPRINGSTED. COM INTRODUCTION The purpose of the administrative modification is to remove one parcel from the existing Tax Increment Financing District. The parcel is 17- 31 -22 -12 -0005 and is shown in Section G. The elimination of the parcel and delay in certification do not materially change the impacts and TIF estimates in the original plan. No other changes are being proposed at this time. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pages) A. Definitions 1 B. Statutory Authorization 1 C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose 1 D. Statement of Objectives 2 E. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District 2 F. Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule 3 G. Property to be Included in the TIF District 4 H. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District 5 I. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District 5 J. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing 5 K. Estimated Public Costs 7 L. Estimated Sources of Revenue 7 M. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness 8 N. Original Net Tax Capacity 8 O. Original Tax Capacity Rate 9 P. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment 9 Q. Use of Tax Increment 10 R. Excess Tax Increment 10 S. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule 11 T. Limitation on Administrative Expenses 11 U. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule 12 V. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 12 W. Prior Planned Improvements 12 X. Development Agreements 13 Y. Assessment Agreements 13 Z. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan 13 AA. Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan 13 AB. Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements 14 Map of the Tax Increment Financing District EXHIBIT I Assumptions Report EXHIBIT II Projected Tax Increment Report EXHIBIT III Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report EXHIBIT IV Market Value Analysis Report EXHIBIT V City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section A Definitions The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authority" means the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority. "City" means the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota; also referred to as a "Municipality ". "City Council" means the City Council of the City; also referred to as the "Governing Body ". "County" means Anoka County, Minnesota. "Development District" means Municipal Development District No. 1 in the City, which is described in the corresponding Development Program. "Development Program" means the Development Program for the Development District. "Project Area" means the geographic area of the Development District. "School District" means Independent School District No. 831, Minnesota. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799, both inclusive. "TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11. "TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document). Section B Statutory Authorization The Development District Act authorizes the City and Authority, upon certain public purpose findings by the City Council, to establish and designate development districts within the City and to develop and administer development programs therefore to meet the needs and accomplish the public purposes specified in Section C. In accordance with the purposes set forth in Section 469.124 of the Development District Act, the City Council and Authority have established the Development District comprising the area described in Section E and have adopted this Development Program. The TIF Act also authorizes the Authority, with approval by the City, to establish and administer tax increment financing districts within the Development District. Eligible public costs of the Development District and TIF District may be paid for tax increments collected from the TIF District. Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose The City Council and Authority have determined that there is a need for the City to take certain actions they deem necessary in order to encourage, ensure and facilitate development and redevelopment by the private sector of underutilized, inappropriately used and unused land located within the corporate limits of the City. Such actions are necessary in order to provide additional employment opportunities for residents of the City and the surrounding area; to improve the tax base of the City, the County and the School District, thereby enabling them to SPRINGSTED Page 1 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota better provide needed public services; and to improve the general economy of the City, the County and the State. Section D Statement of Objectives The Authority seeks to achieve the following objectives through the establishment of TIF District No. 1 -11; 1. redevelop blighted areas as identified 2. provide employment and mixed housing opportunities within the community. 3. improve the tax base of Lino Lakes and the general economy of the City and State; 4. implement relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan. The Authority's specific purpose in establishing TIF District No. 1 -11 is to aid in the creation of a mixed use project consisting of lifecycle housing including townhomes, apartments, condos, and senior housing and commercial space. The project will consist of 161 owner - occupied housing units, 147 rental housing units, and approximately 153,200 square feet of commercial space. The Authority intends to use increment generated by the new developments to write down land costs and the cost of special assessments, including the interest portion, site improvements, streets, public utilities, and for public improvements to Lake Drive. Section E Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District Redevelopment districts are a type of tax increment financing district in which one or more of the following conditions exists and is reasonably distributed throughout the district: (1) parcels comprising at least 70% of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50% of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard requiring substantial renovation or clearance. A parcel is deemed "occupied" if at least 15% of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots; or other similar structures. (2) the property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities, or excessive or vacated railroad right - of -ways; or (3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as defined in section 1150.02, subdivision 15, if the tank facilities: (1) (2) (3) have or had a capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons; are located adjacent to rail facilities; and have been removed or are unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used; or (4) a qualifying disaster area, as defined in section 469.174, subdivision 10b. For districts consisting of two more noncontiguous areas, each area must individually qualify under the provisions listed above, as well as the entire area must also qualify as a whole. SPRINGSTED Page 2 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district in that it meets all of the criteria listed in (1) above. The supporting facts and documentation for this determination will be retained by the Authority for the life of the TIF District and are available to the public upon request. "Structurally substandard" is defined as buildings containing defects or deficiencies in structural elements, essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection (including egress), layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors. Generally, a building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to a new building, or could be modified to satisfy the existing code at a cost of less than 15% of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same size and type. A city may not find that a building is structurally substandard without an interior inspection, unless it can not gain access to the property and there exists evidence which supports the structurally substandard finding. Such evidence includes recent fire or police inspections, on- site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence. Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained. A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building if the following conditions are met: (1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as part of the district; (2) the demolition or removal of the substandard building was performed or financed by the authority, or was performed by a developer under a development agreement with the authority, the authority found by resolution before such demolition or removal occurred that the building was structurally substandard and that the authority intended to include the parcel in the TIF district, and (4) the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be adjusted upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district. (3) In the case of (4) above, the County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the parcel to be the greater of (a) the current tax capacity of the parcel, or (b) a computed tax capacity of the parcel using the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the demolition or removal occurred, and the appropriate classification rate(s) for the current year. At least 90 percent of the tax increment from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation as a redevelopment district. These costs include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of land, removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary to develop the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The allocated administrative expenses of the authority may be included in the qualifying costs. [M.S. Section 469.176, Section F Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule Redevelopment districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt by the Authority of the first tax increment. Modifications of this plan (see Section Z) shall not extend these limitations. SPRINGSTED Page 3 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota The Authority reserves the right to allow the TIF District to remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law (projected to be through the year 2031), but anticipates that the TIF District will be decertified prior to that time (see Section P). All tax increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified shall be paid to the Authority. In addition, no tax increments shall be paid to the Authority from the TIF District after three years from the date of certification unless within that time period: (1) bonds have been issued in aid of the Project Area (except revenue bonds issued pursuant to M.S. Sections 469.152 to 469.165); (2) the Authority has acquired property within the TIF District; or (3) the Authority has constructed public improvements within the TIF District. Section G Property to be Included in the TIF District The TIF District is a 50 acre area of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the location of the TIF District is shown in Exhibit I. The boundaries and area encompassed by the TIF District are described below: Parcel ID Number Legal Description 17- 31 -22 -12 -0002 17 -31 22 12 0005 17- 31 -22 -21 -0020 17- 31 -22 -21 -0021 THAT PRT OF N1/2 OF NE1 /4 OF SEC 17 T31 R22 LYG SELY OF 1 35W; EX E 920 FT THERE OF; ALSO EX S 180 FT OF W 1210 FT OF SD N1/2 OF NE1 /4 SUBJ TO EASE OF REC. THE N 60 FT OF S 180 FT OF E 100 FT OF W 1210 FT OF NW1/1 OF NE1 /1 OF TO EASE OF REC. THAT PRT OF E1/2 OF NW1 /4 OF SEC 17 TWP 31 RGE 22 DESC AS FOL: COM AT INTER OF ELY R/W LINE OF T H NO 49 & S LINE OF SD E112, TH N 24 DEG 56 MIN E ALG SD ELY R/W LINE 1271.78 FT TO POB, TH S 65 DEG 4 MIN E 524.62 FT +OR- TO E LINE OF SD E1/2, TH N 0 DEG 4 MIN E ALG SD E LINE 537.94 FT +OR- TO INTER /W FOL DESC LINE: COM AT INTER OF C/L OF T H NO 49 & S LINE OF SD E113, TH N 24 DEG 56 MIN E ALG SD CIL 1778.6 FT, TH S 65 DEG 4 MIN E 40 FT TO ELY R/W LINE OF SD RD & POB OF SD E1/2 & SD LINE THERE TERM, TH N 65 DEG 4 MIN E 295 FT +OR- TO SD ELY R/W LINE, TH S 24 DEG 56 MIN W ALG SD ELY R/W LINE 487.92 FT +0R- TO POB, EX PRT PLATTED AS THE VILLAGE NO 1, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC THAT PRT OF NE1 /4 OF NW1 /4 OF SEC 17 TWP 31 RGE 22 DESC AS FOL: COM SPRINGSTED Page 4 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota AT INTER OF C/L OF T H NO 8 & S LINE OF SD NW 1 /4 TH N 24 DEG 56 MIN E ALG SD C/L 1778.6 FT, TH S 65 DEG 4 MIN E 40 FT TO ELY R/W LINE OF SD RD & POB, TH CONT S 65 DEG 4 MIN E 295 FT +OR- TO E LINE OF SD 1/4 1/4, TH N ALG SD E LINE 187.47 FT, TH N 65 DEG 4 MIN W 220 FT TO E R/W LINE OF SD RD, TH S 24 DEG 56 MIN W ALG SD R/W LINE 170 FT TO POB, EX PRT PLATTED AS THE VILLAGE NO 1, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC. The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right -of -ways located upon or adjacent to the property described above, and those shown in the map attached as Exhibit I. Section H Property to be Acquired in the TIF District The Authority may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District or reimburse the developer for acquisition of that property. Section 1 Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District The proposed development will consist of a large mixed use project. Major components include lifecycle housing with townhomes, apartments, condos, workforce and senior housing. Also expected to be included in the project are commercial pad sites. The project will be built in phases beginning in 2004 and ending in 2010. Commercial, rental and owner - occupied housing would be under construction simultaneously. Tax increment will be used to finance a portion of the redevelopment and construction costs. The project is expected to be fully constructed in 2010 and be 100% assessed and on the tax rolls as of January 2, 2011 for taxes payable in 2012. The project is proposed to be completed in phases over a 7 year period. At the time this document was prepared there were no signed development contracts with regards to the above described development. Section J Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing In establishing the TIF District, the City makes the following findings: (1) The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district; A building condition assessment was completed by SEH in the fall of 2003 for the proposed site. The report found that parcels consisting of 100% of the area are occupied and 100% of the buildings are structurally substandard. See the summary of the substandard qualifications in Appendix A. SPRINGSTED Page 5 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, and the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan; The proposed development is a mixed use project consisting of commercial, owner - occupied and rental housing in Lino Lakes. The properties in the TIF District have been dilapidated for several years, despite previous efforts by the Authority to encourage its development. The Authority has been trying since 1998 to find a suitable developer for the site. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: As noted above, the site has been blighted for many years. The area is not serviced by public water and sewer. Without installation of the improvements needed to serve the area, the Authority has no reason to expect that significant redevelopment would occur without assistance similar to that provided in this plan. Several environmental conditions exist Therefore, the Authority concludes as follows: a. The city's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0, except for a small amount attributable to appreciation in land value. b. If all development which is proposed to be assisted with tax increment were to occur in the District, the total increase in market value would be approximately $72,222,325. c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $14,092,793. (See Exhibit V) d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Authority finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $58,129,532 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the developer has represented to the Authority that it would not undertake the proposed development without the assistance of tax increment financing. Private investment will not finance these development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these development activities through the use of tax increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will occur within the Project Area. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been SPRINGSTED Page 6 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (3) performed as described above and is shown in Exhibit V. This analysis indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments. The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the TIF District is properly zoned, and the TIF Plan has been approved by the City Planning and Zoning Board and will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (4) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise. The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within the Project Area. The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(a) (see method (b) in Section P). (5) Section K Estimated Public Costs The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax increments of the TIF District. Land /building acquisition 4,200,000 Site improvements /preparation costs 3,500,000 Installation of public utilities 2,145,000 Streets and sidewalks 2,500,000 Interest reduction payments 0 Bond principal payments 0 Bond interest payments 0 Special assessments 3,178,000 Special assessment interest 2,000,000 Administrative expenses 2,571,000 Capitalized interest 2,500,000 Road improvements outside district 3,856,000 Total 26,450,000 The Authority anticipates using a portion of tax increment to repay the City for special assessments including interest at 7% and for public improvements outside the TIF District but within the project area. The Authority reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost is not increased. SPRINGSTED Page 7 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section L Estimated Sources of Revenue Tax increment revenue 25,708,000 Interest on invested funds 292,000 Bond proceeds 0 Loan proceeds 0 Real estate sales 0 Special assessments 0 Rent /lease revenue 0 Grants 450,000 Total 26,450,000 The Authority anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed development through the use of a pay -as- you -go technique. As tax increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these taxes will be distributed to the developer /owner as reimbursement for public costs incurred (see Section K). The Authority reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay - as- you -go assistance, internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt, or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. The Authority also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such costs including, but not limited to, special assessments, utility revenues, federal or state funds, and investment income. Section M Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness The Authority does not anticipate issuing tax increment bonds to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District, but reserves the right to issue such bonds in an amount not to exceed $11,335,000. Section N Original Net Tax Capacity The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For districts certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive, this value is based on the current assessment year. The Estimated Market Value of all property within the TIF District as of January 2, 2003, for taxes payable in 2004, is $880,600. Upon establishment of the TIF District, and subsequent reclassification of property, it is estimated that the original net tax capacity of the TIF District will be approximately $10,345. Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased as a result of: (1) changes in the tax - exempt status of property; (2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District; SPRINGSTED Page 8 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or (4) changes in property classification rates. Section 0 Original Tax Capacity Rate The County Auditor shall also certify the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the original net tax capacity. In future years, the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of (a) the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or (b) the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. At the time this document was prepared, the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District, for taxes levied in 2003 and payable in 2004, was not yet available. When this total becomes available, the County Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating the tax increment generated by the TIF District, the sum of the local tax rates for taxes levied in 2002 and payable in 2003, is 116.924% as shown below. Taxing Jurisdiction 2002/2003 Local Tax Rate City of Lino Lakes 47.603% Anoka County 37.714% ISD 831 24.557% Other 7.050% Total 116.924% Section P Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. For communities affected by the fiscal disparity provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F and Chapter 276A, the original net tax capacity of the TIF District shall be determined before the application of fiscal disparity. In subsequent years, the current net tax capacity shall either (a) be determined before the application of fiscal disparity or (b) exclude the product of any fiscal disparity increase in the TIF District (since the original net tax capacity was certified) times the appropriate fiscal disparity ratio. The method the Authority elects shall remain the same for the life of the TIF District, except that a single change may be made at any time from method (a) to method (b) above. The Authority elects method (b). The County Auditor shall certify to the Authority the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The Authority may choose to retain any or all of this amount. It is the Authority's intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. SPRINGSTED Page 9 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Exhibit H gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit III which shows the projected tax increment generated over the anticipated life of the TIF District. Section Q Use of Tax Increment Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and pay such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit III shows the projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District. The Authority has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of the following purposes: (1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative costs associated with the TIF District (see Section T); (2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; (3) (4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S. Section 469.175, Subdivision 1 a; or (5) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive this requirement. Tax increments shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City. Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government or the State or federal government, or for a commons area used as a public park, or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction or renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes. If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other beneficiary of assistance, to repay all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed with tax increments, such payments shall be subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less than the cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest rate subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the developer or beneficiary. SPRINGSTED Page 10 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section R Excess Tax Increment In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the Authority shall use the excess tax increments to: (1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds; (2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof; (3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds; or (4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution. Section S Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule At least 75% of the tax increments from the TIF District must be expended on activities within the district or to pay for bonds used to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section E for additional restrictions). No more than 25% of the tax increments may be spent on costs outside of the TIF District but within the boundaries of the Project Area, except to pay debt service on credit enhanced bonds. All administrative expenses are considered to have been spent outside of the TIF District. Tax increments are considered to have been spent within the TIF District if such amounts are: (1) actually paid to a third party for activities performed within the TIF District within five years after certification of the district; (2) used to pay bonds that were issued and sold to a third party, the proceeds of which are reasonably expected on the date of issuance to be spent within the later of the five -year period or a reasonable temporary period or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund. used to make payments or reimbursements to a third party under binding contracts for activities performed within the TIF District, which were entered into within five years after certification of the district; or (4) used to reimburse a party for payment of eligible costs (including interest) incurred within five years from certification of the district. Beginning with the sixth year following certification of the TIF District, at least 75% of the tax increments must be used to pay outstanding bonds or make contractual payments obligated within the first five years. When outstanding bonds have been defeased and sufficient money has been set aside to pay for such contractual obligations, the TIF District must be decertified. The Authority anticipates that tax increments will be spent outside of the TIF District (including the allowable administrative expenses)and reserves the right to allow for maximum tax increment pooling from the TIF District. (3) SPRINGSTED Page 11 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section T Limitation on Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the Authority other than: (1) amounts paid for the purchase of land; (2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the project; relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the project; (4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to section 469.178; or (3) (5) amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in clause (1) to (3). Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan or (b) 10% of the total tax increment expenditures for the project. Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The Authority must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District. If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the Authority or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the above activities, the Authority shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section V Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Exhibit IV shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The Authority believes that there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the development therein becomes part of the general tax base. SPRINGSTED Page 12 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section W Prior Planned Improvements The Authority shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with a listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued. There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the TIF District. Section X Development Agreements If within a project containing a redevelopment district, more than 25% of the acreage of the property to be acquired by the Authority is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property is pledged), then prior to such acquisition, the Authority must enter into an agreement for the development of the property. Such agreement must provide recourse for the Authority should the development not be completed. The Authority anticipates entering into an agreement for development, but does not anticipate acquiring any property located within the TIF District. Section Y Assessment Agreements The Authority may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of the TIF District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate, shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located. Any modification or premature termination of this agreement must first be approved by the City, County and School District. The Authority anticipates entering into an assessment agreement. Section Z Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Project Area or the TIF District; increase in the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred; increase in the amount of capitalized interest; increase in that portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the Authority; increase in the total estimated public costs; or designation of additional property to be acquired by the Authority shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements for approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if: (1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District; and SPRINGSTED Page 13 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the Authority agrees that the TIF District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated. The Authority must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date of certification. Section AA Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the Authority shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. The Authority shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the Authority shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The Authority shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value of land and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the County Assessor review and certify this assessment agreement as reasonable. The County shall distribute to the Authority the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In administering and implementing the TIF Plan, the following actions should occur on an annual basis: (1) prior to July 1, the Authority shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a timely manner. (2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification of an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax rates for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be used to determine local tax rates in subsequent years. each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following: (a) the value of property that changes from tax - exempt to taxable shall be added to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The reverse shall also apply; (b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction of the TIF District; (c) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting increase or decrease in net tax capacity (3) SPRINGSTED Page 14 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota shall be applied proportionately to the original net tax capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The County Auditor shall notify the Authority of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section AB Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements The State Auditor shall enforce the provisions of the TIF Act and shall have full responsibility for financial and compliance auditing of the Authority's use of tax increment financing. On or before August 1 of each year, the Authority must annually submit to the State Auditor, County Auditor and to the governing body of the municipality a report which shall: (1) provide full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in the TIF District; (2) permit comparison and reconciliation of the accounts and financial reports; (3) permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of the TIF District; and (4) be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. The report shall include, among other items, the following information: (1) the original net tax capacity of the district and any subdistrict under 469.177, subdivision 1; (2) the net tax capacity for the reporting period of the district and any subdistrict; (3) the captured net tax capacity of the district; (4) any fiscal disparity deduction from the captured net tax capacity under section 469.177, subdivision 3; (5) the captured net tax capacity retained for tax increment financing under 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (1); (6) any captured net tax capacity distributed among affected taxing districts under 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (2); (7) the type of district; (8) the date the municipality approved the tax increment financing plan and the date of approval of any modification of the tax increment financing plan, the approval of which requires notice, discussion, a public hearing, and findings under subdivision 4, paragraph (a); (9) the date the authority first requested certification of the original net tax capacity of the district and the date of request for certification regarding any parcel added to the district; (10) the date the county auditor first certified the original net tax capacity of the district and the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of any parcel added to the district; SPRINGSTED Page 15 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (11) the month and year in which the authority has received or anticipates it will receive the first increment from the district; (12) the date the district must be decertified; (13) for the reporting period and prior years of the district, the actual amount received from, at least, the following categories: (1) tax increments paid by the captured net tax capacity retained for tax increment financing under section 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (1), but excluding any excess taxes; (11) tax increments that are interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments; (iii) tax increments that are proceeds from the sale or lease of property, tangible or intangible, purchased by the authority with tax increments; (iv) tax increments that are repayments of loans or other advances made by the authority with tax increments; (v) bond or loan proceeds; (vi) special assessments; (vii) grants; and (viii) transfers from funds not exclusively associated with the district; (14) for the reporting period and for the prior years of the district, the amount budgeted under the tax increment financing plan, and the actual amount expended for, at least, the following categories: (1) acquisition of land and buildings through condemnation or purchase; (ii) site improvements or preparation costs; (iii) installation of public utilities, parking facilities, streets, roads, sidewalks, or other similar public improvements; (iv) administrative costs, including the allocated cost of the Authority; and (v) public park facilities, facilities for social, recreational, or conference purposes, or other similar public improvements; and (vi) transfers to funds not exclusively associated with the district; (15) for properties sold to developers, the total cost of the property to the Authority and the price paid by the developer; (16) the amount of any payments and the value of in -kind benefits, such as physical improvements and the use of building space, that are paid or financed with tax increments and are provided to another governmental unit other than the municipality during the reporting period; SPRINGSTED Page 16 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (17) the amount of any payments for activities and improvements located outside of the district that are paid for or financed with tax increments; (18) the amount of payments of principal and interest that are made during the reporting period on any non - defeased: (i) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (19) the principal amount, at the end of the reporting period, of any non - defeased: (i) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (20) the amount of principal and interest payments that are due for the current calendar year on any non - defeased: (i) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (21) if the fiscal disparities contribution under chapter 276A or 473F for the district is computed under section 469.177, subdivision 3, paragraph (a). the amount of increased property taxes imposed on other properties in the municipality that approved the tax increment financing plan as a result of the fiscal disparities contribution; (22) whether the tax increment financing plan or other governing document permits increment revenues to be expended; (1) to pay bonds, the proceeds of which were or may be expended on activities outside of the district; for deposit into a common bond fund from which money may be expended on activities located outside of the district; or (iii) to otherwise finance activities located outside of the tax increment financing district; (23) the estimate contained in the tax increment financing plan of the cost of the project, including administrative expenses to be paid with tax increment; and (24) any additional information the state auditor may require. The Authority must also annually publish in a newspaper of general circulation in the City an annual statement for each tax increment financing district showing: SPRINGSTED Page 17 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (1) the original net tax capacity of the district and any subdistrict under 469.177, subdivision 1; (2) the net tax capacity for the reporting period of the district and any subdistrict; (3) the captured net tax capacity of the district; (4) the month and year in which the authority has received or anticipates it will receive the first increment from the district; (5) the date the district must be decertified; (6) the amount of principal and interest payments that are due for the current calendar year on any non - defeased obligations; (7) if the fiscal disparities contribution under chapter 276A or 473F for the district is computed under section 469.177, subdivision 3, paragraph (a). the amount of increased property taxes imposed on other properties in the municipality that approved the tax increment financing plan as a result of the fiscal disparities contribution; (8) the amounts of tax increment received and expended in the reporting period; (9) and any additional information the authority deems necessary. The annual statement must inform readers that additional information regarding each district may be obtained from the authority, and must explain how the additional information may be requested. The Authority must publish the annual statement for a year no later than August 15 of the next year. The authority must identify the newspaper of general circulation in the municipality to which the annual statement has been or will be submitted for publication and provide a copy of the annual statement to the county board, county auditor, the school board, the state auditor, and the governing body of the municipality on or before August 1 of the year in which the statement must be published. The reporting and disclosure requirements outlined in this section shall begin with the year the district was certified, and shall end in the year in which both the district has been decertified and all tax increments have been spent or returned to the county for redistribution. Failure to meet these requirements, as determined by the State Auditors Office, may result in suspension of distribution of tax increment. SPRINGSTED Page 18 Exhibit I Map of Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 Proposed boundaries of Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 SPRINGSTED Page 19 Exhibit 1 Map of Development District No. 1 Development District No. 1 City of Lino Lakes Anoka County, Minnesota SPRINGSTED Page 20 Exhibit 11 Assumptions Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 The Village Project Scenario B - Fiscal disparities contribution from within district Type of Tax Increment Financing District Maximum Duration of TIF District Redevelopment 25 years from 1st increment Projected Certification Request Date 06/01/04 Decertification Date 12/31/31 (26 Years of Increment) Base Estimated Market Value Original Net Tax Capacity Base Estimated Market Value Increase in Estimated Market Value Total Estimated Market Value Total Net Tax Capacity 2003/2004 $880,600 $10,345 Assessment/Collection Year 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 $880,600 $880,600 $880,600 $880,600 0 10,614,465 21,228,930 35,673,395 $880,600 $11,495,065 $22,109,530 $36,553,995 $10,345 $141,072 $282,144 $499,066 City of Lino Lakes 47.603% Anoka County 37.714% ISD #831 24.557% Other 7.050% Rice Creek Watershed Local Tax Capacity Rate 116.924% 2002/2003 Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District Administrative Retainage Percent (maximum = 10 %) Pooling Percent 35.6909% 10.00% 15.00% Bonds Note (Pay -As- You -Go) Bonds Dated 06/01/04 Note Dated 06/01/04 Bond Issue @ 5.92% (NIC) $11,335,000 Note Rate 8.00% Eligible Project Costs $7,959,040 Note Amount $7,066,500 Present Value Date & Rate 06/01/04 5.00% Notes SPRINGSTED Page 21 Projected Tax Increment Report 0 (.) r *L r N O C Z E (op 0 y W C 0 •_c O E E O O w •0 a) U O co CB C 0) J .0 E '6 a o c ~ w �'c v U v C N a) It co m V O C •[ R C H V N 0 0 CO 3 C Na CO 0) CO CO r0- 00 (0 00 0) NO- 000 00 O CO O 00 0 00 0) 00 0 N V 0) o0 0) OMO 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C N M 0) (n 0) N N N (V (V N N N N N (V N (V N CV N N (V N N M O c0 co ( N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N- r C O 0 CO 0 0 00 0 0 0 CO 0) 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0) _ N ' C O O U N O O n. N 1 _C O o u) 0 E .� O O) 0 Q cr Q O c 0 MO co O 0 0 O O U) ti CO N- (O )f) In (O (O (O 14) LO (O Ln CO (O (O LO (O (O LO CI) co O O C 0) N- M 0) 0 .- O C CD 0) .- co C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Cr„ C C C N C (00 M C 1I) (CD (0 (0 CAD (0 CO (0 (CO CO CO CO CO CO CO (0 CO CO (0 (0 (0 CO 0 0 0 co C 00 N O co O O O O co O O O O O co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO O CO M N- 01 CO N. 0) N- O CD CO CO (O (D CO O CD O CO CD O (D O (D CO CD CD 0 CO (O M (O O M 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) .-- M U) is Cr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 C M C O CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 «) C C C C (O (O CD CD CO CD CO CO CO CO CO CD CO (D CO CD (D CO (O (0 (D O r 0) h (O h 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Cr) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M $92,880 $2,570,840 $3,856,260 0 0 0 co co co Cf) co co co co Co) (+) co co co c) co co c+) (+) co c+) (+) 4)) co M O In 0) N. N CO (O CO CO CO CO (D (.0 C0 (D CO CO CO CO CD (O CO CO CO CO CO CO 0) N CO 00 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 11) .r- M(0 CO V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M (4) ti 0) O V- V- c- c- c- V- .- V- .- .-- V- c- c- c- •- r' •- •- T- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C T N N N N N N N 04 N N N N N N N N 04 N N N N N N N N N N N N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O 0) 0) Q) 0) 0) 0) Cr) C) 0) 0) 0) 0) O O O 0) 0) CA Cr) 0) 0) 0) X U O (fl O (D (D D co (D O O O (O O O D O c0 O O O (O O (O (O .. ~ o U 0 X .T S � F • C0 t U Z 0 0 N. 0) 0) N C (O CO CD CO (D (O CD CO CO O C0 CO CO (D CD (D CO (0 O CO O O ti m 0) CO M() CO CO CO CO CCO O CO CO CO MN CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO N 00000000000000000000 r- (D (O C O C "Cr C C 'Cr 'Cr C 'Cr 'Cr 'Cr 'Cr C C 0) 0) Cr 'Cr C C N Cr O CO CO 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Cn C) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Cr) 0) Cn O 0) o O O O O N.- O 0) 00 00 00 O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO N O O O 00 O O 00 O U) CO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N rn C) J l V L O. a> C (D (D CO (D CD D (fl O D (D O CO CD CO O CD O D D O N 0 O 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Q CO C (() (() LCC) (f) (f) (f) (O (O (f) (O (f) (f) (f) (() U) (CC() (C�y(}) (() (() (f) (f) LC) (f) lD (f) (f) (f) (f) 0 X T M CC) CO M M CO M CO M CO CO CO CO M (C') CO CO CO ) Cc)) 00 CO ) CO C CO CO CO C (C) <I' Cr m 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t.n C_ U J O Z CO —O (p ~ U '- O M — O M C (f) N h O C N rC 00O h (h (+D ) 00 C M C ) O 0 O 0 00) 0 0 O r 0 0) O 0 col .80 O 0 0) 00 O ) !r. O C0O 0 ) O O � 00 ) cot O 0 O 0 O 0 CO 0 OO ) O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0) X a v O � 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C (n O 1- O O) O c- N M Cr (O CD h CO 0) 0 N CO C (O CO N- CO CA 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N CO CO CO rit -0 0) M M M M M M M M C` CM M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 C _^ 010101010101040.10101010404040401010104040401010/N0/010101 C ll SPRINGSTED Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report With Project and TIF District 0 N 0 o O U O a. -O M_ O N En En 41 O O CO U in C 0)" M_ N M a) a) '@ j CO N L C M a U C CO N a o Q ( h >• x >, U Z 2 ca H 0 0 0 * 0 CO o U CO O 0) CO 0) L a) 0 (0 M O O N O Q' J 2 D I- 0 a L 7 O w 0_ p J T < (0 2 H V CD X N .CD 7 H 'p 0) II 0 0 0 0 CO 1.0 N O LO CO (n N O M (- M . M N CO O O co co O) O I- O 00 N I� 0) N CO CO CO CO CD CO CO CO CO 00 CO CO 0 co 0) O) 0) CD CO 0 O 0000 CD x CO 0 CO N (0 F'- •'. d' OM) d~' U CO O ) CO (0 N o I- Z 0 C N U 2002/2003 0 0 0 0 M V O O O CO r- (f) o O U V M N oo J (x0 N H X as F- 4) z U (6 0) U Q) C U X 'O CO c0 . 7 CD 0)) O CO c6 d CO .- CD 00 N- N City of Lino Lakes Anoka County CO 0 N g 15 .N o ai ai U (6 a U x LL '(' CS V m w O LL m w H U 'X J O ""o" O o w a`) .c 3 p 3 0 0 0 U 0) _0 O >'' O 0) (0 L a C co CD co- V Q U x o 0 a N N .O > CO -a x • I- m w > X �p H I- U C X 70 (� a) O a 0 3 a) Ic0 D o w z o c c o o -o -0 v) Z (� 7 Cl _T N 0) U 2 0 -00 0 `) O >, U �«- N 0. E 2 a N 7 ""' @ O m U a) LL >" w .- U O (0 0 N 0 C o a) -O a) 0) H 'm O 7 c m C_ N w CO 0) O () a N (� o v Z C! a as a) T N E 0 ce U 'O S] N 'd O 0) 7 O O ++ 0) N a 0 O_ Q) C O O) U 7` -O a) () O 0) Q C 0 U (c) O) U a) 2 U O C O; 'D w N X C a 'x 3 ° a) w a) @ 0 -5 c0 0 C - O O L • O .5 C 0) O U w 3 3 CC .() _0 C co ai .0 o • , n E) >' .x 0) 0) d 0 (0 0 X a7 a) C " Statement 1: Statement 2: 0) a) X (d (13 O — N The impact on th M N a) 0) 0 SPRINGSTED Exhibit V Market Value Analysis Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 The Village Project Scenario B - Fiscal disparities contribution from within district Assumptions Present Value Date P.V. Rate - Gross T.I. 06/01/04 5.00% Increase in EMV With TIF District Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment Subtotal Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF $72,222,325 12,468,770 $59,753,555 0 Difference $59,753,555 Annual Present Gross Tax Value @ Year Increment 5.00% 1 2006 152,851 136,404 2 2007 317,798 270,097 3 2008 539,778 436,913 4 2009 762,323 587,664 5 2010 984,868 723,068 6 2011 1,042,465 728,909 7 2012 1,100,063 732,555 8 2013 1,100,063 697,671 9 2014 1,100,063 664,449 10 2015 1,100,063 632,808 11 2016 1,100,063 602,675 12 2017 1,100,063 573,976 13 2018 1,100,063 546,644 14 2019 1,100,063 520,613 15 2020 1,100,063 495,822 16 2021 1,100,063 472,211 17 2022 1,100,063 449,725 18 2023 1,100,063 428,310 19 2024 1,100,063 407,914 20 2025 1,100,063 388,489 21 2026 1,100, 063 369,990 22 2027 1,100,063 352,371 23 2028 1,100,063 335,592 24 2029 1,100,063 319,611 25 2030 1,100,063 304,392 26 2031 1,100,063 289,897 $25,801,343 $12,468,770 SPRINGSTED Page 24 Date: 12/03/2004 Time: 15:12:13 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000673 LANDFORM ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. 1 612.51 612.51 .00 .00 000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 2 207.68 207.68 .00 .00 000726 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 1 246.80 246.80 .00 .00 000761 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 1 346.13 346.13 .00 .00 000765 BECK, CHARLES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000766 BONA, JEFF 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000772 FILTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. 1 255.28 255.28 .00 .00 000794 HALLE PROPERTIES, L. L. C. 1 44,862.30 44,862.30 .00 .00 000810 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 1 385.63 385.63 .00 .00 000816 KORDIAK, JAMES 1 519.50 519.50 .00 .00 000833 BROCK WHITE, INC. 2 903.62 903.62 .00 .00 000837 PETERSON, JOHN R. 1 762.21 762.21 .00 .00 000841 RETAMCO, INC. (HOMESTEAD ESCROW) 1 984.56 984.56 .00 .00 000879 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH PLAN 1 37,329.37 37,329.37 .00 .00 000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 13,263.85 13,263.85 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 7 1,631.10 1,631.10 .00 .00 000998 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES, INC. 3 4,362.29 4,362.29 .00 .00 001052 INTERSTATE COMPANIES, INC. 1 1,393.13 1,393.13 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 464.29 464.29 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 2,874.47 2,874.47 .00 .00 001247 CROWN TROPHY, INC. 2 1,432.41 1,432.41 .00 .00 001260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 1 144.20 144.20 .00 .00 001280 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 2 219.48 219.48 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 3,478.95 3,478.95 .00 .00 001297 ARCH, SHARON 1 505.00 505.00 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 4,437.95 4,437.95 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 59.03 59.03 .00 .00 Date: 12/03/2004 Time: 15:12:14 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 479.96 479.96 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 305.53 305.53 .00 .00 001540 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. 2 194.67 194.67 .00 .00 001550 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 941.50 941.50 .00 .00 001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 6.30 6.30 .00 .00 001680 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC. 1 430.10 430.10 .00 .00 001720 GRAINGER, INC. 2 879.37 879.37 .00 .00 001752 MOONEN, PATRICK 1 62.58 62.58 .00 .00 001768 H & L MESABI, INC. 3 728.78 728.78 .00 .00 001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 197.97 197.97 .00 .00 001859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 450.64 450.64 .00 .00 001881 HUGO HEATING AND COOLING 1 125.00 125.00 .00 .00 001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 43.80 43.80 .00 .00 002147 SOURCE ONE GRAPHICS, INC. 1 74.82 74.82 .00 .00 002170 KOTTKES' BUS SERVICE, INC. 1 185.00 185.00 .00 .00 002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 888.00 888.00 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 16.81 16.81 .00 .00 002330 LICHTSCHEIDL, DAVE 1 375.00 375.00 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 117.90 117.90 .00 .00 002440 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC. 1 27.18 27.18 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 _ 200.57 200.57 .00 .00 002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 2 1,246.00 1,246.00 .00 .00 002613 MIDWEST LANDSCAPES, INC. 1 9,269.00 9,269.00 .00 .00 002900 MN. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1 39.50 39.50 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 1 160.00 160.00 .00 .00 003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 2 1,196.85 1,196.85 .00 .00 003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 2 278.83 278.83 .00 .00 Date: 12/03/2004 Time: 15:12:15 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003228 NORTH AMERICAN SALT COMPANY, INC. 1 2,872.20 2,872.20 003271 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 46.80 46.80 003300 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LANDSCAPING 1 221.54 221.54 003370 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. 1 4,872.78 4,872.78 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 254.00 254.00 003410 OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE CO., INC. 1 351.50 351.50 003443 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER, INC. 1 121.96 121.96 003492 PETTY CASH 1 309.80 309.80 003524 PITNEY BOWES, INC. 1 247.78 247.78 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 4 258.35 258.35 003617 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2 189.10 189.10 003753 REINERT, JEFF 1 141.56 141.56 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 4 5,944.70 5,944.70 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 66.60 66.60 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 3 456.34 456.34 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 1,111.86 1,111.86 004059 SMYSER, JEFF 1 35.00 35.00 004100 SPRINGSTED, INC. 1 13,686.48 13,686.48 004110 CARL BOLANDER & SONS COMPANY 1 3,991.67 3,991.67 004125 ST. PAUL CITY OF 1 1,200.00 1,200.00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 5 2,805.32 2,805.32 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 93.77 93.77 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 5 1,031.00 1,031.00 004470 COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES, INC. 1 267.01 267.01 004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 1 6,127.11 6,127.11 004760 WALDOCH SPORTS, INC. 1 23.32 23.32 004788 SPRINT 1 57.82 57.82 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Date: 12/03/2004 Time: 15:12:15 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name # of items Operator: JAL Page: 5 Net Gross Discount Discount Lost 005026 ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 1 493.60 493.60 .00 .00 900448 GEPHART ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 283.25 283.25 .00 .00 900482 WOLF'S DEN GUN SHOP 1 213.68 213.68 .00 .00 900486 FUN SERVICES, INC. 1 625.86 625.86 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 1 631.33 631.33 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 151 204,906.87 204,906.87 .00 .00* Date: 12/03/2004 Time: 15:16:20 Operator: JAL Ranges: Options: Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 72564 0 0 72566 0 0 0 72567 0 0 72568 0 0 0 0 0 0 4299 - 4326 Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. AFSCME COUNCIL #5 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY' BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. CENTRAL PENSION FUND GRAPHICS PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING FORFEITURE '89 PONT GRAND PRIX TOW PAYROLL WITHHOLDING DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE FORFEITURES HALLE PROPERTIES, L. L REIMBURSE ESCROW /DISCOUN * * * * * * ** INTL UNION OF OPER ENG PAYROLL WITHHOLDING LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR PAYROLL WITHHOLDING MIDWEST LANDSCAPES, IN TREES MN NCPERS LIFE INSURAN PAYROLL WITHHOLDING MN. DEPARTMENT OF PUBL LICENSE TABS PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURIN K -9 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE RETAMCO, INC. (HOMESTE OVERPAYMENT OF ASSESSMEN WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY Total for Dept ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** O MRPA BASKETBALL REGISTRATION ADULT SP Total for Dept 202 0 BONA, JEFF O CUB FOODS 0 FUN SERVICES, INC. O IDEA ART, INC. 0 KOTTKES' BUS SERVICE, O ST. JOSEPH'S CHURCH SANTA SUPPLIES PROGRAM REC PAPER TRANSPORTATION HALL RENTAL Total for Dept 205 0 CROWN TROPHY, INC. TROPHYS Total for Dept 207 O CROWN TROPHY, INC. TROPHYS SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL YOUTH IN YOUTH SP Amount 513.69 692.54 175.30 493.60 207.68 2,112.00 2,742.26 246.80 44,862.30 420.00 888.00 7,978.50 416.00 39.50 8,476.48 167.85 1,042.52 984.56 719.80 73,179.38* 160.00 160.00* 50.00 91.73 625.86 32.65 185.00 200.00 1,185.24* 1,225.71 1,225.71* 206.70 Date: 12/03/2004 Time 15:16:20 Operator: JAL Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 208 0 REINERT, JEFF REIMBURSE CONF EXPENSES 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC NOV 22 Total for Dept 401 0 ACCLAIM BENEFITS FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER 0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 SPRINT MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER Total for Dept 402 O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES Total for Dept 405 MAYOR /CO MAYOR /co ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST CHARTER 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SENIORS 0 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER SENIORS 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SENIORS Total for Dept 406 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FINANCE 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FINANCE 0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE FINANCE O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FINANCE Total for Dept 407 O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY Total for Dept 414 O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES /OC Total for Dept 415 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LANDFORM ENGINEERING C PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK SMYSER, JEFF DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS STREET ALIGNMENT HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES /OC REIMBURSE PROGRAM TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC NOV 10 Total for Dept 416 LEGAL CO ECONOMIC ECONOMIC ECONOMIC ECONOMIC ECONOMIC PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING 206.70* 141.56 516.00 657.56* 144.20 148.76 75.06 44.64 2,024.92 113.05 23.75 57.82 2,632.20* 151.61 151.61* 4.72 45.71 4.75 55.18* 104.14 48.21 770.09 14.97 937.41* 12,136.95 12,136.95* 29.75 13.48 352.18 4.75 510.00 910.16* 59.50 26.65 612.51 704.36 9.50 795.00 35.00 244.00 2,486.52* Date: 12/03/2004 Time: 15:16:20 Operator: JAL Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER 0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES /OC 0 SOURCE ONE GRAPHICS, I PAPER INSERTS Total for Dept 418 O MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER O EAR MICROPHONE O SYMPOSIUM /KELLY & DALE O UNIFORM SUPPLIES 72565 REIMBURSE CLOTHING 0 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 A T & T /OCTOBER 0 HARD DRIVE /MEMORY O DENTAL INSURANCE 0 LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 0 OCTOBER USAGE 72569 MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER 0 ANIMAL CONTROL 0 ENGRAVING /CONTAINERS /CON 0 HEALTH INSURANCE O LIFE INSURANCE O DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT 0 COURSE /3 0 UNIFORM SUPPLIES 0 SUPPLIES 0 MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER 0 SUPPLIES 72570 MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 A T & T WIRELESS ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S ASPEN MILLS, INC. BRAGELMAN, CHRISTOPHER C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CENTRAL COMMUINICATION DELL MARKETING L.P. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. METRO SALES INCORPORAT MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTEC NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE PETTY CASH PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SHRED -IT, INC. ST. PAUL CITY OF STREICHER'S, INC. TARGET TDS METROCOM WOLF'S DEN GUN SHOP XCEL ENERGY Communit Communit Communit Communit Communit Communit Communit POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE ALLOW POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 421 0 0 0 0 0 0 72563 M FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS BUILDING MOONEN, PATRICK REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW BUILDING NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER BUILDING PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE BUILDING RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE STATE OF MINNESOTA /BUI SEMINAR /PATRICK M Total for Dept 422 BUILDING BUILDING 59.50 28.09 13.75 660.28 9.50 120.00 51.32 942.44* 49.00 346.13 189.10 126.50 50.00 473.78 446.57 7,990.61 522.53 408.08 204.00 37.00 420.26 121.96 309.80 13,142.15 147.25 66.60 1,200.00 2,805.32 9.40 514.93 213.68 22.63 29,817.28* 87.19 37.51 1,802.06 14.25 1,941.01* 119.02 49.29 62.58 76.42 2,266.74 16.62 35.00 2,625.67* Date: 12/03/2004 Time: 15:16:20 Operator: JAL Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES, WINTER SALT 0 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU PARTS O BROCK WHITE, INC. CRACK FILL O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 0 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT SIGN 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS STREETS 0 MENARDS, INC. FENCE MATERIAL STREETS O NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, STREET SIGNS STREETS O NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER STREETS O NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO HIGHWAY SALT STREETS O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE STREETS 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE STREETS 0 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS ASPHALT STREETS 0 TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER STREETS 72570 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE STREETS Total for Dept 430 STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN FASTENER & SU COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES, DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE T FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. GRAINGER, INC. H & L MESABI, INC. INTERSTATE COMPANIES, LEEF BROTHER, INC. LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPM OLSEN CHAIN /CABLE CO., PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN PARTS FLEET DRUM /OIL FLEET GASOHOL FLEET DENTAL INSURANCE FLEET REPAIR FLEET PADS FLEET LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FLEET SAFETY CABINET CUTTING EDGE SELECTOR -PU SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS /SUPPLIES SLING HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET RYDEEN, LESTER REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW FLEET SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI PARTS CLEANER FLEET WALDOCH SPORTS, INC. COMBUSTION CHAMBER FLEET Total for Dept 431 O ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS O CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF O CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC 0 FILTRATION SYSTEMS, IN O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. O GEPHART ELECTRIC COMPA 0 HUGO HEATING AND COOLI 0 J. H. LARSON COMPANY, 0 METRO SALES INCORPORAT O OFFICEMAX, INC. O PITNEY BOWES, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER OFFICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER CHAIR FILTERS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS MATERIAL /REPAIR COUNCIL REPAIR FURNACE EMERGENCY SERVICE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES POSTAGE METER RENTAL GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 4,362.29 49.49 903.62 144.31 59.03 65.19 175.53 1,196.85 45.71 2,872.20 1,617.78 23.04 93.77 112.82 3,345.09 15,066.72* 121.60 267.01 3,478.95 34.21 6.30 278.83 13.21 879.37 728.78 1,393.13 16.81 27.18 46.80 351.50 693.04 5.46 75.57 292.04 23.32 8,733.11* 265.81 1,005.71 2,770.43 631.33 255.28 7.60 283.25 125.00 342.76 1,042.00 254.00 247.78 Date: 12/03/2004 Time: 15:16:20 Operator: JAL Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN O SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI 0 SOURCE ONE GRAPHICS, I 0 TDS METROCOM 0 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72570 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HEALTH INSURANCE GOVERNME LIFE INSURANCE GOVERNME MEMORY FOR P C GOVERNME PAPER INSERTS GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER GOVERNME SUPPLIES GOVERNME Total for Dept 432 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, IN CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. HOFFMAN, MICHAEL HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH LICHTSCHEIDL, DAVE NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN XCEL ENERGY ARCH, SHARON DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS READY MIX PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER PARKS DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW SUPPLIES PRINTING PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER PARKS HEALTH INSURANCE PARKS LIFE INSURANCE PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS Total for Dept 450 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN BROCHURE /PROGRAM REC RECREATI DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RECREATI MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI P/R NEWSLETTER HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 451 0 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, L 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 0 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC ECOLOGICAL PLANNING ENVIRONM DENTAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ENVIRONM MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER ENVIRONM HEALTH INSURANCE ENVIRONM ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE OCT 27 Total for Dept 461 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL Total for Dept 462 O BECK, CHARLES REIMBURSE OAK WILT O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM SOLID INS SOLID SOLID SOLID SOLID WA WA WA WA WA 495.20 4.75 1,111.86 23.50 767.92 207.83 9,842.01* 139.31 104.04 133.89 65.54 197.97 438.84 117.90 375.00 147.49 891.00 26.13 62.09 2,699.20* 505.00 95.20 34.77 14.82 4,872.78 1,131.26 15.20 6,669.03* 385.63 10.41 4.91 45.71 196.02 13.30 1.66 271.00 928.64* 8.93 5.06 201.96 1.43 164.30 381.68* FORESTRY 500.00 FORESTRY 10.41 Date: 12/03/2004 Time: 15:16:20 Operator: JAL Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, IN FLAGS FORESTRY O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FORESTRY O MIDWEST LANDSCAPES, IN TREES FORESTRY O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE FORESTRY 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FORESTRY Total for Dept 463 O ANOKA COUNTY 72571 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI 0 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. O HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN 0 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV O INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, O MENARDS, INC. O NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I O NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS O ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC O PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN O RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN O TDS METROCOM 72570 XCEL ENERGY 72571 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI O DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M O FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. O INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES O NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LA O ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC 0 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN 0 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN 72570 XCEL ENERGY 194.67 4.91 1,290.50 196.02 1.66 2,198.17* TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY WATER 36.45 UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE WATER 232.14 TABLET WATER 219.48 DENTAL INSURANCE WATER 78.85 LONG TERM DISABILITY INS WATER 24.62 GASKET /NOZZLE /VALVE WATER 305.53 SUPPLIES WATER 11.80 WATER SAMPLE WATER 85.00 LUMBER WATER 25.04 WATER METER PARTS WATER 6,127.11 MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER WATER 45.71 MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER WATER 215.05 HEALTH INSURANCE WATER 1,030.01 ADVERTISING WATER 66.00 LIFE INSURANCE WATER 16.17 MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER WATER 102.82 MONTHLY SERVICE WATER 1,240.97 Total for Dept 494 9,862.75* UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS INSPECTION ADD HEADS TO SYSTEM MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER HEALTH INSURANCE ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 495 SEWER 232.15 SEWER 49.09 SEWER 24.60 SEWER 43.80 SEWER 221.54 SEWER 215.05 SEWER 677.82 SEWER 66.00 SEWER 11.37 SEWER 629.43 2,170.85* O ANOKA COUNTY TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY OTHER O CARL BOLANDER & SONS C CONTRACTOR CENTURY FARM OTHER O KORDIAK, JAMES CONDEMNATION SERVICES OTHER O PETERSON, JOHN R. COMMISSIONER /62ND STREET OTHER O SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK FIELD EVALUATION /REPORT OTHER O SPRINGSTED, INC. BOND SERVICE /2004 A SERI OTHER 0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY OTHER Total for Dept 499 145.80 3,991.67 519.50 762.21 4,519.70 13,686.48 407.10 24,032.46* Grand Total 213,835.64* CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -184 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE AREA AND UNIT FUND TO THE 1996A G.O. IMPROVEMENT BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND WHEREAS, The 1996A Bond Debt Service Fund has a deficit balance, and WHEREAS, these bonds were originally sold to finance 1996 Construction Projects, and WHEREAS, resources of the Area and Unit Fund were pledged toward the retirement of the 1996A Bond issue. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following transfer be adopted: Imp. Bonds 1996A (314) Area and Unit Fund (406) Increase Decrease $427,775.46 $427,775.46 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 20th day of December, 2004. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1B STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE 12/20/04 TOPIC Resolution No. 04 -184 Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Area and Unit Fund to the 1996A G.O. Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND The 1996A Debt Service Fund was established to service the debt on the 1996 improvement projects. The debt was to be retired using special assessments to benefited properties and resources of the Area and Unit Fund. This fund is currently in a deficit situation. Resolution 04 -184 would transfer the necessary funds from the Area and Unit Fund to eliminate this deficit. The amount of the transfer is $427,775.46. It is staff's recommendation that the City Council approve Resolution 04 -184 authorizing this transfer. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 04 -184 Transferring funds from the Area and Unit fund to the 1996A G.O. Improvement Bond fund to eliminate the deficit. 2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration. 3. Deny Resolution 04 -184. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1B STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE 12/20/04 TOPIC Resolution No. 04 -184 Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Area and Unit Fund to the 1996A G.O. Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND The 1996A Debt Service Fund was established to service the debt on the 1996 improvement projects. The debt was to be retired using special assessments to benefited properties and resources of the Area and Unit Fund. This fund is currently in a deficit situation. Resolution 04-184 would transfer the necessary funds from the Area and Unit Fund to eliminate this deficit. The amount of the transfer is $427,775.46. It is staffs recommendation that the City Council approve Resolution 04-184 authorizing this transfer. OPTIONS 1 Adopt Resolution 04-184 Transferring funds from the Area and Unit fund to the 1996A G.O. Improvement Bond fund to eliminate the deficit. 2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration. 3. Deny Resolution 04 -184. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04-184 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE AREA AND UNIT FUND TO THE 1996A G.O. IMPROVEMENT BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND WHEREAS, The 1996A Bond Debt Service Fund has a deficit balance, and WHEREAS, these bonds were originally sold to finance 1996 Construction Projects, and WHEREAS, resources of the Area and Unit Fund were pledged toward the retirement of the 1996A Bond issue. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following transfer be adopted: Increase Imp. Bonds 1996A (314) $427,775.46 Area and Unit Fund (406) Decrease $427,775.46 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 20th day of December, 2004. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 1C STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE 12/20/04 TOPIC Resolution No. 04-185 Authorizing the Transfer of funds from Area and Unit Fund to the Water Operating Fund VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND Each year a transfer is budgeted from the Area and Unit Fund to the Water Operating Fund to pay principal and interest on the 1996B G.O. Water Revenue Bonds. This transfer is a part of the funding mechanism set up in the original bond documents. The amount of the transfer is $303,108. It is staffs recommendation that Council authorize this transfer as budgeted. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 04 -185. 2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration. 3. Deny Resolution 04 -185. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04-185 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE AREA AND UNIT FUND TO THE WATER OPERATING FUND FOR PAYMENT OF 1996B G.O. WATER REVENUE BOND WHEREAS, a transfer was budgeted in 2004 to the Water Operating Fund from the Area and Unit Fund to cover principal and interest on the 1996B G.O. Water Revenue Bonds due in 2004, and WHEREAS, it is staffs recommendation that this transfer be completed effective December 31, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, that the following transfer be authorized and recorded effective December 31, 2004: Increase Decrease Water Operating Fund (601) $303,108 Area and Unit Fund (406) $303,108 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 20th day of December, 2004. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE 12/20/04 TOPIC Resolution No. 04 -186 Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Area and Unit Fund to the 1998A G.O. Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND The 1998A Debt Service Fund was established to service the debt on the 1997 and 1998 improvement projects. The debt was to be retired using special assessments to benefited properties and resources of the Area and Unit Fund. This fund is currently in a deficit situation. Resolution 04 -186 would transfer the necessary funds from the Area and Unit Fund to eliminate this deficit. The amount of the transfer is $398,000. It is staff's recommendation that the City Council approve Resolution 04 -186 authorizing this transfer. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 04 -186 Transferring funds from the Area and Unit fund to the 1998A G.O. Improvement Bond fund to eliminate the deficit. 2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration. 3. Deny Resolution 04 -186. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -186 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE AREA AND UNIT FUND TO THE 1998A G.O. IMPROVEMENT BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND WHEREAS, The 1998A Bond Debt Service Fund has a deficit balance, and WHEREAS, these bonds were originally sold to finance 1997 and 1998 Construction Projects, and WHEREAS, resources of the Area and Unit Fund were pledged toward the retirement of the 1998A Bond issue. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following transfer be adopted: Increase Decrease Imp. Bonds 1998A (318) $398,000 Area and Unit Fund (406) $398,000 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 20th day of December, 2004. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1E STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE 12/20/04 TOPIC Resolution No. 04 -187 Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the Area And Unit Fund to the 1999A G.O. Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND Each year a transfer is made into the 1999A Bond Fund to cover the deficit balance. These bonds were originally sold to finance the West Central Trunk. In 1995, funds were transferred to the Area and Unit Fund from TIF funds to defray the cost of the trunk. The transfer is to cover the fund balance deficit. The amount of the transfer is $270,000. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 04 -187 transferring funds from the Area and Unit fund to the 1999A G.O. Improvement Bond fund to eliminate the deficit. 2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration. 3. Deny Resolution 04 -187. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -187 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE AREA AND UNIT FUND TO THE 1999A G.O. IMPROVEMENT BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND WHEREAS, The 1999A Bond Debt Service Fund has a deficit balance, and WHEREAS, these bonds were originally sold to finance the West Central Trunk, and WHEREAS, resources of the Area and Unit Fund were pledged toward the retirement of the 1999A Bond issue, and WHEREAS, a transfer is made annually from the Area and Unit Fund to the 1999A Bond Debt Service Fund to cover debt service payments. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following transfer be adopted: Increase Decrease Imp. Bonds 1999A (320) $270,000 Area and Unit Fund (406) $270,000 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 20th day of December, 2004. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM IF STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE 12/20/04 TOPIC Resolution 04 -188 Authorizing the Closing of 1996A Improvement Bonds Debt Service Fund VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND The City established the 1996A Improvement Bonds Debt Service Fund (Fund 314) was established to account for debt service payments on the G.O. Improvement Bonds Series1996A. Tthe G.O. Improvement Bonds Series1996A have been refinanced with the G.O. Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Series 2003A. The final payment has been made on the original bond issue and no further activity is anticipated in these funds. It is standard accounting practice to close refunded debt service funds to the new debt service fund of the refunding issue in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. In this case, the Improvement and Refunding Bond 2003A Debt Service Fund is the appropriate fund into which this debt service fund should be closed. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that the City Council adopt Resolution 04 -188 authorizing the closing of this fund and the residual equity transfer resulting from the closure. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 04 -188 Authorizing the Closing Of 1996A Debt Service Fund 2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration. 3. Deny Resolution 04 -188. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -188 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLOSING OF 1996A IMPROVEMENT BONDS DEBT SERVICE FUND WHEREAS, the 1996A Improvement Bonds Debt Service Fund (Fund 314) was established to account for debt service payments on the G.O. Improvement Bonds Series1996A by the City of Lino Lakes, and WHEREAS, the G.O. Improvement Bonds Series1996A have been refinanced with the G.O. Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Series 2003A, and WHEREAS, it is standard accounting practice to close refunded debt service funds to the new debt service fund of the refunding issue in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, that staff is hereby authorized to close the following fund and to make residual fund transfers to the associated debt service fund as follows: Funds to be Closed Funds Receiving Residual transfers Imp Bond 1996A Debt Service Fund (Fund 314) Imp and Refunding Bond 2003A Debt Service Fund (Fund 324) Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 20th day of December, 2004. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 1G STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE December 20, 2004 TOPIC Consideration Resolution 04 -193 Authorizing Fund Transfers To And Closing Of The 1997 And 1998 Construction Funds VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Simple Majority In 1997 and 1998 the City Council approved improvement projects and awarded contracts for the realignment of Otter Lake Road and Service Road, Lakes Addition Street and Utilities, Lake Drive Trunk Utilities, Apollo Drive Phase III and 21st Avenue Utilities. The improvement projects have since been completed and contracts have been finalized. Funding for these projects was to have come from a variety of sources including bonds, general property taxes, Anoka County, transfers from the Area and Unit Fund and the Stormwater Management Fund, and future special assessments. However, the transfers from the Area and Unit Fund and the Stormwater Management Fund for these projects have not been made to date. During the course of planning and final approval of the projects there were changes in project scope and other factors, such as easement acquisition, that affected the total cost of the projects. Because of this and because the transfers from the Area and Unit Fund and the Stormwater Management Fund were not made at the time, deficits remain in the 1997 and 1998 Construction Funds. It is in the best interest of the City, and sound financial management, to make transfers to the construction funds to eliminated the deficits and to close the funds for these completed project. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 04 -194 which authorizes the fund transfers and closes the 1997 and 1998 construction funds. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 04 -193 Authorizing Fund Transfers To And Closing Of The 1997 And 1998 Construction Funds. 2. Refer back to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04-193 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FUND TRANSFERS TO AND CLOSING OF THE 1997 AND 1998 CONSTRUCTION FUNDS WHEREAS, in 1997 and 1998 the City Council approved improvement projects and awarded contracts for the realignment of Otter Lake Road and Service Road, Lakes Addition Street and Utilities, Lake Drive Trunk Utilities, Apollo Drive Phase III and 21st Avenue Utilities, and WHEREAS, such improvement projects have been completed and contracts have been finalized, and WHEREAS, funding for these projects was to have come from a variety of sources including bonds, general property taxes, Anoka County, transfers from the Area and Unit Fund and the Stormwater Management Fund, and future special assessments, and, WHEREAS, no transfers from the Area and Unit Fund and the Stormwater Management Fund for these projects have not been made to date, and WHEREAS, there remain deficits in the 1997 and 1998 Construction Funds relating to such improvement projects, and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to make such transfers and to close these project funds. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that: 1) The following operating transfers are hereby authorized: PROJECT Otter Lake Rd Realign Otter Lake Rd Realign Lakes Addn. Street & Utilities Lake Dr. Trunk Utilities 21st Ave. Utilities Apollo Dr. Phase III FROM FUND 406 422 101 406 406 422 2) Following such operating transfers, Funds 457 and balances transferred to Fund 406. TO FUND 457 457 458 458 458 458 AMOUNT $ 349,270.30 349,270.30 141,869.42 1,346,607.55 942,417.34 231,220.31 458 are to be closed, with any residual Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 20th day of December, 2004. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ann J. Blair, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 1H STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE December 20, 2004 TOPIC Consideration Resolution 04 -194 amending the 2004 General Operating Budget for the City of Lino Lakes VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Simple Majority During the year, the City Council receives certain revenues and approves certain expenditures that were not included in the adopted general operating budget. In 2004, the City was awarded a federal Cops Fast Grant for 3 new officers, a state grant for a volunteer coordinator and received a rebate from the Anoka County 800 MHz radio program. The new police positions were filled during the year and the radio rebate was used for related police equipment. In addition, team building and goal setting sessions were held by the City Council, and tax abatements were distributed which were not budgeted. It is standard management and accounting practice to amend the general operating budget to reflect such unbudgeted revenues and expenditures. Staff has from time to time in the past brought such amendments before the City Council for formal action. Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution 04 -194 amending the 2004 General Operating Budget. OPTIONS 1 Adopt Resolution 04 -194 amending the 2004 General Operating Budget. 2. Refer back to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -194 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 2004 GENERAL OPERATING BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a general operating budget for 2004, and, WHEREAS, from time to time the City Council has received certain revenues and approved certain expenditures that were not included in the adopted general operating budget, and, WHEREAS, it is standard management and accounting practice to amend the general operating budget to reflect such revenues and expenditures. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that the general operating budget for 2004 be amended as follows: REVENUES: ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENT AMOUNT 101 - 3055 -000 TAX ABATEMENTS $ 106,500 101 - 3315 -000 COPS FAST GRANT 49,275 101 - 3348 -000 OTHER STATE REVENUE /GRANTS 14,350 101 - 3364 -000 ANOKA COUNTY OTHER REVENUE 7,700 TOTAL AMENDMENTS $ 177,825 ORIGINAL 2004 GENERAL OPERATING BUDGET 6,794,916 AMENDED 2004 GENERAL OPERATING REVENUES $6,972,741 EXPENDITURES: ADJUSTMENT ACCOUNT AMOUNT 101 - 401 - 4300 -000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 7,000 101 - 401 - 4900 -000 CITY MARKETING 1,650 101 - 415 - 4405 -000 TAX ABATEMENTS 106,500 101 - 420 -4101 -000 POLICE SALARIES 43,528 101 - 420 - 4121 -000 POLICE PERA 3,830 101 - 420 -4122 -000 POLICE FICA 995 101 - 420 - 4131 -000 POLICE HEALTH INSURANCE 7,500 101 - 420 - 4133 -000 POLICE LIFE INSURANCE 180 101 - 420 - 4134 -000 POLICE DENTAL INSURANCE 420 101 - 420 - 4151 -000 POLICE WORKERS COMP 600 101 - 420 - 5000 -000 POLICE CAPITAL OUTLAY 14,275 101 -432- 4410 -000 CONTRACTED SERVICES (12,000) 101 - 432 - 5000 -000 CAPITAL OUTLAY 12,000 101 - 499 - 4910 -000 CONTINGENCY (8,650) TOTAL AMENDMENTS $ 177,825 ORIGINAL 2004 GENERAL OPERATING BUDGET 6,794,916 AMENDED 2004 GENERAL OPERATING REVENUES $6,972,741 Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 20th day of December, 2004. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ann J. Blair, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 2A STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek DATE December 20, 2004 TOPIC Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -189 adopting the Final 2004 Tax Levy, Collectible in 2005. Simple Majority VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Truth in Taxation requires the City of Lino Lakes to adopt and certify a final 2004 tax levy, collectible in 2005 on or before December 28th. The total levy includes dollars for the general operating budget as well as dollars for special levies for PERA, tax abatement and general bonded debt. The levy provides resources for salary and wage adjustments, capital outlay and equipment replacement, street maintenance and a contingency for unforeseen emergencies. The levy remains the same as proposed and adopted in September of this year. A Truth in Taxation public hearing was held on the tax levy on December 13. Tax levy information was presented and discussed during the public hearing and public testimony was received. The City Council needs to take final action on the tax levy at this time. Staff recommendation is to adopt Resolution 04 -189 approving the final 2004 Tax Levy, collectible in 2005. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -189 adopting the final 2004 tax levy, collectible in 2005. 2. Refer to Staff for further review. 3. Deny Resolution No. 04 -189. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -189 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL 2004 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2005. WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has budgeted to pay expenditures for General Fund operating costs anticipated in the year 2005; and, WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has budgeted to pay the annual debt service on outstanding indebtedness; and, WHEREAS, the City Council adopted its preliminary 2004 tax levy, collectible in 2005, in anticipation of the above expenses; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has published in the official newspaper all notices required by Minnesota statutes and the City Charter; and, WHEREAS, the City Council held its Truth in Taxation public hearing on December 13, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, approves its final 2004 tax levy, collectible in 2005, upon taxable property within the City of Lino Lakes as follows: 1. Total amount levied in the year 2004 to be spread for taxes due and payable in the year 2005 is $7,269,302. 2. The total amount above levied is for the following purposes: General Operating Levy $6,215,313 Special Levies Increased PERA Contribution 8,898 Tax Abatement 118,000 General Bonded Debt Public Project Revenue Bond 135,479 Civic Complex Bond 1998A 332,525 G.O. Improvement Bond 1998B 151,072 Taxable G.O. Improvement Bond 2003B 23,668 Equipment Certificates of 2002 50,085 Equipment Certificates of 2003A 52,605 Equipment Certificates of 2003B 74,550 Equipment Certificates of 2004 107,107 Total General Obligation Bonded Debt 927,091 TOTAL LEVIES $7,269,309 Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 20th day of December, 2004. Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor A -1 AGENDA ITEM 2B STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE December 20, 2004 TOPIC Consideration of adopting Resolution 04 -190 adopting the final 2005 General Fund Operating Budget for the City of Lino Lakes VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Simple Majority State Statutes require the City of Lino Lakes to adopt and certify a final 2005 operating budget on or before December 28. A Truth in Taxation public hearing was held on the budget on December 13. A summary of the proposed budget and tax levy was presented and discussed during the public hearing and public testimony was received. No changes have been made to the proposed budget since it was adopted on September 13, and no recommendations for changes were made in ensuing work sessions. The final 2005 budget represents a 19.86% increase from the 2004 budget. The City experienced growth in the tax base of 14.60% over the same period. The budget provides resources for Council priorities, additional staff positions, salary and wage adjustments, capital outlay and equipment replacement, street maintenance and repair and a contingency for unforeseen emergencies. The City Council needs to take final action on the budget at this time. Staff recommendation is to adopt Resolution 04 -190 approving the final 2005 General Fund Operating Budget. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 04 -190 adopting the final 2005 General Fund Operating Budget. 2. Refer to Staff for further review. 3. Deny Resolution 04 -190. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -190 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL 2005 GENERAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. WHEREAS, Pursuant to State Statute, the Lino Lakes City Council is required to adopt a resolution setting out final General Fund revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the following final General Fund operating budget be adopted for 2005: 2005 FINAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET REVENUES: Property Taxes $6,394,211 Intergovernmental Revenue 480,000 Licenses and Permits 774,750 Charges for Services 191,500 Fines & Forfeitures 100,000 Interest on Investments 65,000 Miscellaneous 139,250 TOTAL FINAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES $8,144,711 EXPENDITURES: Administration $1,246,817 Community Development 1,015,245 Public Safety 3,199,029 Public Services 2,608,620 Other 75,000 TOTAL FINAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $8,144,711 Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 20th day of December, 2004. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 2C STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE December 20, 2004 TOPIC Consideration of adopting Resolution 04 -191 adopting the final 2005 Water and Sewer Operating Budgets VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Simple Majority The City Council reviewed the proposed 2005 Water and Sewer Operating Budgets at their Budget work session held August 26, 2004. No adjustments have been made to the proposed budgets since that date. The budgets include the cost of depreciation of infrastructure as an expense, and recovery of this cost is incorporated into the utility rate structure. It has been the practice of the City Council to adopt the Water and Sewer Operating budgets by resolution. Staff recommendation is to adopt Resolution 04 -191 adopting the final 2005 Water and Sewer Operating Budgets. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 04 -191 adopting the final 2005 Water and Sewer Operating Budgets. 2. Return to staff for further review. 3. Deny Resolution 4 -191. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -191 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2005 WATER AND SEWER OPERATING BUDGETS WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed 2005 Water and Sewer Operating Budgets during their work session held August 26, 2004, and, WHEREAS, the City Council each year adopts the Water and Sewer Operating Budgets by resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES that the following Water and Sewer Operating Budgets for the year 2005 are hereby adopted: 2005 Water Operating Budget 2005 Sewer Operating Budget Operating Revenues $1,052,000 $1,310,000 Transfers 304,195 -0- Total Revenues & Transfers $1,356,195 $1,310,000 Operating Expenses $ 902,841 $1,209,408 Debt Service 418,990 -0- Total Expenses $1,321,831 $1,209,408 Revenues/Transfers over/ Under Expenses $ 34,364 $ 100,592 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, this 20th day of December, 2004. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 2D STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE December 20, 2004 TOPIC Consideration of adopting Resolution 04 -192 adopting the 2005 Recreation Fund Operating Budgets VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Simple Majority The City Council reviewed the proposed 2005 Recreation Fund Operating Budgets at their Budget work session held August 26, 2004. The budget being presented for approval has not changed since the work session. The Recreation Fund is a special revenue fund and operates from revenues collected from recreation fees. No part of the tax levy is used to finance Recreation Fund operations. The budget for 2005 estimates that a small surplus of $7,115 will be realized in this fund. It has been the practice of the City Council to adopt the Recreation Fund Operating budgets by resolution. Staff recommendation is to adopt Resolution 04 -192 adopting the final 2005 Recreation Fund Operating Budget. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution 04 -192 adopting the final 2005 Recreation Fund Operating Budgets. 2. Return to staff for further review. 3. Deny Resolution 04 -192. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 4-192 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2005 RECREATION FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, the Recreation Fund is a Special Revenue Fund, and WHEREAS, Special Revenue Funds are required to adopt a budget for the forthcoming year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES that the following Recreation Fund Operating Budget for the year 2005 is hereby adopted: 2005 RECREATION FUND BUDGET REVENUES EXPENDITURES Adult Instructional $ 10,000 $ 9,550 Adult Leagues 37,430 33,120 Youth Instructional 109,120 106,545 Youth Leagues 52,200 51,600 Special Events 4,505 5,325 Program Totals $213,255 $206,140 Operating Surplus 0 7,115 Recreation Fund Totals $213,255 $213,255 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, this 20th day of December, 2004. John Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 20, 2004 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Easement Vacation FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 03 - 04, Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements and Accepting New Easements, Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Brook Peninsula VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND: The applicant is setting up a meeting with the neighbor to discuss the easement vacation at Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Brook Peninsula. Discussions between City Staff and the property owners continue to take place. We are requesting that the Public Hearing be continued to the January 24, 2005 City Council meeting. OPTIONS: 1. Continue the Public Hearing to the January 24, 2005 City Council meeting. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 1. -37 AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 12/20/04 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -200 Terminating Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -8 and Directing Decertification by the County Auditor VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes created TIF District No. 1 -8 on April 28, 1997. The establishment of this 25 -year Redevelopment District was in response to several areas within the city that met the criteria for redevelopment and had potential for redevelopment. Of the three sites within the district, only one has redeveloped. Fairview Healthcare was provided with assistance to redevelop the former Gethsemane Church site on the southwest corner of the 35W/Lake Drive and construct its clinic. All obligations under the agreement with Fairview have been met. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 04 -200 Terminating TIF District No. =8 2. Do not terminate the district. 3. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -200 TERMINATING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO, 1 -8 AND DIRECTING DECERTIFICATION THEREOF BY THE COUNTY AUDITOR WHEREAS, by adoption of a resolution April 28, 1997, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "Authority") has heretofore approved Tax Increment Financing (Redevelo ment) District No. 1 -8 (the "District "), located within .st } " and has approved a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the " Plan"), as amended, for the District to provide assistance to the Fairview Healthcare Clinic project; and WHEREAS, the County Auditor of Anoka County has certified the original net tax capacity and the original local tax rate of the District pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177; and WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, all of the projects have been completed, all obligations to which tax increment from the District has been pledged have been paid in full or defeased, and the Authority has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to terminate and decertify the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that (i) the District is hereby terminated and (ii) the Clerk-Administrator shall provide a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Anoka County so that the District may be decertified on the books and records of the County Auditor with no further tax increment from the District being remitted to the City. Adopted: December 20, 2004. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk &GO- POO e 4 4 e 4IP 401 4s. - 4 0 - zo AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 12/20/04 TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 04 -201 Approving modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11 VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes approved TIF District No. 1 -11 on November 24, 2003. The establishment of this 25 -year Redevelopment District was intended to provide a source of revenue for development of the city's downtown area, known as Woods Edge, and is comprised mainly of the Arctic Sandblasting site and the Tagg home. Because of some minor adjustment to the site plan for Woods Edge, the Tagg home site (PIN 17- 31 -22 -12 -0005) is now a part of the YMCA site and no longer a part of the Woods Edge Planned Unit Development Earlier this evening the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority approved a modification of the TIF Plan to remove the parcel. This resolution removes the Tagg home parcel from the district before certification, which will occur by year- end. Elimination of the parcel and delay in certification do not materially change the impacts and TIF estimates in the plan. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 04-201 Modifying TIF District No. 1 -11 2. Do not modify the district. 3. Retum to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04-201 RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 -11 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 03 -11 approved November 24, 2003, the Economic Development Authority (the "Authority ") for the City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") approved the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan ") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11 (the "TIF District "), pursuant to and in conformity with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 through 469.1081 (the "EDA Act ") and Sections 469.174 to 469.179 (the "TIF Act "); and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 03 -209 approved November 24, 2003, the City Council of the City, after a duly notice public hearing, approved the Plan for the TIF District; and WHEREAS, since that time the City and Authority have diligently worked to negotiate a development agreement regarding the TIF District, and determined to postpone filing the i"it' District for certification pending completion of such negotiations; and WHEREAS, on October 12, 2004, the City and Authority each approved a Contract for Private Development between the City, Authority and Legacy Holdings/Lino Lakes LLC (the "Contract"); and WHEREAS, in reviewing the development contemplated in the Contract, the Authority has determined that Parcel No. 17- 31 -22 -12 -0005 (the "Parcel ") should be eliminated from the TIF District and WHEREAS, under Section 469.175, subd. 4 of the TIF Act, the Authority may modify the Plan for the TIF District without the notice and hearings required for a new district, if the only change is to eliminate parcels from the TIF District, and the current net tax capacity of those parcels equals for exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the district's original net tax capacity; and WHEREAS, the TIF District has not yet been filed for certification, but the City expects to file for certification by the end of December, 2004, in which event the original net tax capacity for all parcels in the 1'a District will be the tax capacity as of January 2, 2004 (for taxes payable in 2005); and SJB- 256718v1 1N140 -So -42- WHEREAS, the Parcel to be eliminated does not yet have an original net tax capacity, so at the time the TIF District is filed for certification, the boundaries of the district will exclude the Parcel; and WHEREAS, the Authority has determined to modify the Plan, prior to filing for certification, in order to eliminate the Parcel; and WHEREAS, elimination of the Parcel does not affect or impair the findings made by the City Council, upon approval of the Plan, that the TIF District is a redevelopment district under the TIF Act; and WHEREAS, the Authority has approved the modified Plan and recommended approval by this Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes as follows: 1. The administrative modification to the Plan, eliminating the Parcel, is hereby approved in substantially the form on file in City Hall. 2. The Community Development Director is authorized to forward a copy of the modified Plan to the Department of Revenue pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, subd.4a. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to forward a copy of the Plan to Anoka County and request that the Auditor certify the original tax capacity of the TIF District, as modified, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 469.177. DATED: December 20, 2004 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk SJB- 240584v1 LN 140-80 -43- T rm jn P,Rrf doi rrifF.410 !,.t. Exhibit PropriqP-cl boundaries Incremarrt Finane. (Rocinvelopmanti District No SPRINGSTED AGENDA ITEM 6D STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 20, 2004 TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -197, Approving Change Order No. 2 and Payment Request No. 4, Holly Drive Improvements Project VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: At the July 26, 2004 meeting, City Council awarded the Holly Drive Improvements contract to W.B. Miller. The current approved contract amount is $884,086.31. Change Order No. 2 addresses the additional work of the weir construction, structure adjustments, watermain connection, and the added 4" draintile. This results in an additional cost of $11,066.70. A complete breakdown is spelled out in the attached Change Order No. 2. The construction costs are still below the Engineer's Estimate of $911,004.00. It is staffs recommendations to approve Change Order No. 2, which results in a total project cost of $895,153.01 and authorize Payment No. 4 in the amount of $53,745.17. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 04 -197, approving Change Order No.2 and Payment Request No. 4 for the Holly Drive Improvements Project. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 04 -197. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 04 -197, CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -197 RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 AND PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 4 — HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. WHEREAS, pursuant to the resolutions of the Council adopted July 26, 2004, awarding the construction contract for the Reconstruction of Holly Drive to W.B. Miller Inc., and WHEREAS, the construction of the project has commenced, AND WHEREAS, weir construction, structure adjustments, watermain connection, and 4' draintile was added, AND WHEREAS, a complete breakdown is spelled out in the Change Order No. 2; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Change Order No.2 resulting in an increase of $11,066.70 bringing the contract amount to $895,153.01 and Pay Request No. 4 in the amount of $53,745.17 is approved for the Holly Drive Improvements Project. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 20th day of December 2004. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ann J. Blair, City Clerk TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS 1500 Piper Jaffrey plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101.2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.con Comm. No. 12623 -02 Cert. No. 4 St.. Paul, MN, December 8 , 20 04 To City of Lino Lakes. Minnesota This Certifies that W.B. Miller. Inc. For Holly Drive Improvements Owner , Contractor Is entitled to Fifty -Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fortv -Five Dollars and 17/100 (S 53,745.17 ) being 4th estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated July 26 , 2044 Received payment in full of above Certificate. TKDA W.B. Miller, Inc. 20. Scott A_ Brink, PE RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT —d7 CONTRACT PLUS EXTRAS PAYMENTS CREDITS Contract price plus extras $ 824,186.70 All previous payments $ 546,562.84 All previous credits Extra No Change Order No. 1 $ 59,899.61 " Change Order No. 2 $ 11,066.70 PI II W " Credit No. $ VI N II II II " " AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE $+ 53,745.17 Totals $ 895,153.01 $ 600,308.01 $ - Credit Balance $ - There will remain unpaid on contract after payment of this Certificate $ 294,845.00 ii 895 153.0 $ - 895,153.01 —d7 TKDA Engineers- Architects - Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS Estimate No. 4 Period Ending November 30 , 20_,Q4 _ Page 1 of 1 Comm. No. 12623 -01 Contractor W.B. Miller. Inc. Original Contract Amount 5824.186.70 Project Holly Drive Improvements Location Citv of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Total Contract Work Completed Total Approved Credits Total Approved Extra Work Completed - CO 1 CO2 Approved Extra Orders Arno= Completed Total Amount Earned This Estimate $ $ S 583,010.47 S 0.00 37,826.00 11,066.70 $ 48,892.70 S 631,903.17 Less Approved Credits S 0.00 Less 5 % Retained $ 31,595.16 Less Previous Payments $ 546,562.84 Total Deductions $ 578,151.00 Amount Due This Estimate S 53,745.17 ESTIMATE NO. 4 HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF UNO LAKES. MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 12823 -02 ITEM MN/DOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION . HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS 1 2011.832 REMOVE & RESET EXISTING PROPERTY IRONS 2 2021.501 MOBIUZATION 3 2101.502 CLEARING 4 2101.507 GRUBBING 5 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERT (CMP,CPP) 6 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERT (RCP) 7 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) 8 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 9 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 10 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACING (STREET & DRIVEWAY) 11 2104.509 REMOVE CATCH BASIN 12 2104.511 SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 13 2104.513 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 14 2104.521 SALVAGE & REINSTALL WIRE FENCE 15 2104.521 SALVAGE & REINSTALL WO00 FENCE 18 2104.523 SALVAGE & RELOCATE MAIL BOX WITH SUPPORT 17 2104.523 SALVAGE SIGN (INCL POST & ASSEMBLY) 18 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) 19 2105.501 POND EXCAVATION (P) 20 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 21 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) 22 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) 23 2123.510 EXPLORATORY DIGGING 24 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 FOR STREET, TRAIL, & DRIVEWAY (100% CRUSHED) 25 2350.501 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR STREET (C) 28 2350.501 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR TRAIL (C) 27 2350.502 TYPE LV 3 NON - WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR STREET (C) 28 2350.503 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS (C) (2" THICK) 29 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 30 2451.809 1.5" CRUSHED ROCK (TRENCH STABILIZATION) 31 2501.515 15" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD 32 2501.515 18" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD 33 2501.515 21" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD 34 2501.515 27" RC PIPE APRON WI TRASH GUARD 35 2502802 10" PVC CLEANOUT INCL CASTING ASSEMBLY 38 2502.802 12' PVC CLEANOUT INCL CASTING ASSEMBLY 37 2503.511 10" PVC PIPE SEWER, SDR28. 38 2503.511 12" PVC PIPE SEWER, SDR28 39 2503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3008 CLASS V 40 2503.541 18' RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 41 2503.541 21" RC PIPE SEWER, DESIGN 3006 CLASS 111 42 2503.541 2T RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3008 CLASSIII 43 2504.802 ADJUST VALVE BOX 44 2504.802 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 45 2504.602 RELOCATE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE 48 2504.802 HYDRANT 47 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOX 48 2504.802 18' GATE VALVE & BOX 49 2504.803 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON, CL 52 50 2504.803 18" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON, CL52 51 2504.604 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 52 2504.806 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 53 2506.502 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 OVER EXIST.15"RCP 54 2508.502 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 55 2506.502 CONSTRUCT SLOTTED VANE DRAIN 56 2506.502 CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE, TYPE 406 57 2508.502 CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 409 58 2508.502 CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE OUTFALL 59 2508.502 CONSTRUCT 72" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 409 60 2506.502 CONSTRUCT 98' DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE ST 61 2508.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING (CB OR MH) 82 2508.502 RECONSTRUCT EXISTING MANHOLE 83 2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS. III 64 2521.501 4' CONCRETE WALK 85 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN 8418 - 4 9 - 68 2531.507 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT PERIOD ENDING: November 30, 2004 CONTRACT QUANTTTY UNIT AMOUNT UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE IQQQQQW�ggqq��Tcqq ;A N� 21.0 - $ 110.00 $ - 1.0 0.75 $ 18,000.00 5 12,000.00 200.0 240.0 $ 180.00 S 38,400.00 215.0 255.0 $ 105.00 S 26,775.00 258.0 290.0 3 3.70 S 1,073.00 308.0 308.0 $ 4.75 $ 1,483.00 39.0 39.0 $ 4.75 $ 185.25 154.0 208.0 S 4.25 $ 884.00 772.0 242.0 $ 525 $ 1,270.50 11,527.0 11,527.0 S 9.45 S 108,930.15 2.0 - $ 105.00 S - 42.0 22.0 $ 4.20 S 9240 292.0 301.0 S 3.85 $ 1,098.85 130.0 $ 4.25 S 108.0 108.0 $ 12.50 $ 1,325.00 5.0 4.0 S 95.00 S 380.00 11.0 11.0 S 78.00 S 858.00 8,742.0 3,000.0 $ 7.85 S 23,550.00 132.0 420.0 5 10.25 S 4,305.00 4,000.0 2,934.0 $ 8.30 $ 18,484.20 4,000.0 2,934.0 5 12.00 $ 35,208.00 1,038.0 180.0 3 10.50 $ 1,890.00 5.0 - $ 110.00 5 TN 9,485.0 9,485.00 S 0.10 S 948.50 TN 1,765.0 5 40.25 S TN 549.0 $ 47.00 $ TN 1,765.0 1,587.06 $ 3925 $ 61,507.11 291.0 108.0 $ 11.50 $ 1,242.00 885.0 $ 1.50 S 77.0 77.67 5 28.50 5 2,058.26 8.0 2.0 $ 1,175.00 S 2,350.00 4.0 3.0 5 1,230.00 $ 3,690.00 1.0 1.0 5 1,580.00 S 1,580.00 1.0 1.0 $ 2,000.00 S 2,000.00 4.0 3.0 $ 470.00 S 1,410.00 1.0 1.0 $ 630.00 S 630.30 928.0 873.0 $ 13.50 $ 11,785.50 162.0 140.0 S 16.75 $ 2,345.00 608.0 458.0 S 18.80 5 8,610.40 635.0 584.0 S 21.00 S 12,264.00 60.0 52.0 S 23.50 $ 1,22.00 35.0 43.0 S 32.80 $ 1,410.40 4.0 8.0 S 110.00 S 880.00 1.0 3.0 5 1,050.00 $ 3,150.00 1.0 1.0 S 1,260.00 S 1,260.00 1.0 3.0 $ 2,100.00 S 8,300.00 1.0 3.0 $ 500.00 $ 1,500.00 1.0 2.0 S 3,850.00 S 7,300.00 2.0 24.0 S 52.00 S 1,248.00 332.0 372.0 S 42.00 5 15,824.00 25.0 • S 15.50 S 843.0 1,173.0 3 1.30 $ 1,524.90 1.0 - $ 2,000.00 $ 10.0 8.0 S 1,375.00 S 8,250.00 8.0 8.0 S 1,200.00 $ 9,600.00 6.0 5.0 S 1,525.00 $ 7,825.00 2.0 4.0 $ 1,400.00 $ 5,500.00 1.0 1.0 $ 1,575.00 $ 1,575.00 2.0 2.0 3 3,200.00 3 8,400.00 5.0 5.0 5 6,000.00 S 25,000.00 6.0 7.0 $ 276.00 $ 1,925.00 1.0 1.0 5 650.00 3 650.00 54.0 56.0 S 85.00 5 4,780.00 1,543.9 - S 3.10 5 7,328.0 7,390.0 $ 7.85 $ 58,011.50 100.0 - S 37.00 s ESTIMATE P40. 4 HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF UNO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 12623 -02 PERIOD ENDING: November 30, 2004 REM MN/DOT CONTRACT OUANTTTY UNIT AMOUNT NO. 140. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE 67 2531.818 TRUNCATED DOME SF 258.0 - $ 12.00 $ - 68 2540.602 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EA 5.0 4.0 $ 95.00 $ 380.00 69 2563.801 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 0.75 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,875.00 70 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C (F&I) SF 94.0 - $ 21.00 1 71 2564.531 SKIN PANELS TYPE D (F8J) SF 17.0 - S 30.00 $ 72 2564.536 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN (INCL POST & ASSEMBLY) EA 11.0 6.0 $ 100.00 $ 500.00 73 2564.503 PVMT MARK 24" STOP LINE WHITE, POLY PREFORMED LF 142.0 - $ 1525 $ 74 2584.603 PVMT MARK 4' DOUBLE SOUD UNE YELLOW, PAINT LF 3,900.0 - $ 0.35 1 75 2564.618 ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE, POLY PREFORMED SF 288.0 - $ 14.00 $ 78 2571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, BBB) (HACKBERRY) TR 30.0 - $ 285.00 1 77 2571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B&B) (RED OAK) TR 30.0 - $ 285.00 1 78 2571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE (2" CAL, B&B) (SUGAR MAPLE) TR 30.0 - 1 265.00 $ 79 2573.502 SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED LF 4,360.0 3,635.0 $ 2.25 $ 8,178.76 80 2573.602 STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION EA 28.0 - $ 110.00 $ 81 2573.802 HAY BALE DITCH CHECK LF 90.0 • $ 625 $ 82 2575.505 SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT SY 11,490.0 $ 2.35 I) 83 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CATEGORY 1 (VMOOD FIBER BLANKET) SY 3,809.0 8,680.0 1 1.80 1 10,688.00 84 2675.605 SEEDING (1NCL SEED MIX 508 OR 608, FERTIUZER. MULCH & DISC ANCHORING) SUBTOTAL ESTIMATE NO.3 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 1 COI ADD WATERMAIN (CASSIOPEIA COURT TO HOLLY COURT) CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN HYDRANT r GATE VALVE AND BOX r GATE VALVE AND BOX r WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON Cl 52 r WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS ACRE Gggi��T 3.000.00 s $ 683,01037 1.0 - $ 1,060.00 $ 2.0 - $ 2,100.00 1 2.0 ti 500.00 $ 3.0 2.0 $ 860.00 $ 1,700.00 50.0 - 1 62.00 $ 1,330.0 1,338.0 $ 27.00 $ 38,128.00 749.0 $ 1.30 1 SUBTOTAL ITEM NO. 1 $ 37,826.00 2 . C01 MINERAL POINT CONNECTION SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LF 194.0 1 3.85 $ RBAOVE BRUMINOUS PAVEMENT (STREET) SY 280.0 - 1 9.45 $ AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 48.6 - $ 0.10 1 TYPE LV4 WEARING COURSE TN 25.1 $ 40.25 $ TYPE LV4 NON - WEARING COURSE TN 33.5 - $ 39.25 $ BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 14.0 - $ 1.50 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EA 1.0 - 1 1,050.00 1 r WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LF 180.0 - 1 27.00 $ SUBTOTAL RBA NO. 2 $ SUBTOTAL CHANGE ORDER 140. 1 37,825-00 CHANGE ORDER NO.2 1 CO2 ADO WATERMAIN AND STORM SEWER ADJUSTMENTS: CONSTRUCT WEIR AT 12THMOLLY LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,125.00 $ 1,125.00 ADJUST 96' DIA STRUCTURES AND OUTFALLS LS 1.0 1.0 $ 2,954.50 $ 2,954.50 ADDITIONAL DEPTH 96' DIA STRUCTURES LF 10.3 10.3 $ 324.00 $ 3,33720 WATERMWN TIE-414 S. TRAPPERSIIINERAL PT HR 6.0 6.0 $ 450.00 $ 2,700.00 4' DRAIN TILE/CONN TO CB AT CASSIOPEIA CT LS 1.0 1.0 $ 950.00 1 950.00 SUBTOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.2 1 11,011.70 TOTAL ESTIMATE NO.4 $ 631,903.17 CHANGE ORDER TKDA Engineers- Architects - Planners Saint Paul, MN November 30 20 04 Comm. No. 12623 -02 Change Order No. 2 To W.B. Miller. Inc. r i for Holly Drive Improvements { for f Lin s Lakes ota You are hereby directed to make the following change to your contract dated July 26 , 20 04 . The change and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipntations and covenants. This Change Order will (die) (increase) (net -saga) the contract sum by Eleven Thousand Sixty -Six Dollars and 70/100 S 11.066,70 This change order provides for changes in the work of this contract according to the attached itemization. NET CHANGE = Amount of Original Contract Additions approved to date (Nos. COl ) Deductions approved to date (Nos. Contract amount to date Amount of this C2ange Order (Add) (No -Gage) Revised Contract Amount Approved City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA Owner By By Approved W..B. Miller, Inc. Contractor By $ 11,066.70 s 824,186.70 59,899.61 884,086.31 Scott A. Brink, P.E. White - Owner Pink - Contractor Blue - TKDA '4NGE ORDER NO. 2 DATE: November 30, 2004 HOLLY DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS CRY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 12623-02 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 ADD WATERMAIN AND STORM SEWER ADJUSTMENTS: CONSTRUCT WEIR AT 12TH/HOLLY LS 1.0 $ 1,125.00 $ 1,125.00 ADJUST 96` DIA STRUCTURES AND OUTFALLS LS 1.0 $ 2,954.50 $ 2,954.50 ADDITIONAL DEPTH or DIA STRUCTURES LF 10.3 $ 324.00 $ 3,33720 WATERMAIN TIE -IN S. TRAPPERS/MINERAL PT HR 6.0 $ 450.00 $ 2,700.00 4' DRAIN TILE AND CONNECTION TO CATCH BASIN AT CASSIOPEIA CT LS 1.0 S 950.00 $ 950.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 $ 11,066.70 AGENDA ITEM 6E STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 20, 2004 TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -198, Approving Final Payment, Black Duck Pumping Station VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: The contractor for the Black Duck Pumping Station, Northdale Construction Company is requesting City approval of Payment No. 4 (final) in the amount of $16,829.11. A copy of the final payment is attached. The contractor has satisfactorily completed all work and has provided all necessary documentation. The original contract amount was $289,920.01 and the final contract amount is $288,018.17. This results in a decrease of $1,838.84. The two -year warranty period for this lift station began November 10, 2004. OPTIONS: 1 Return to staff for further review. 2 Approve Resolution 04-198 Payment No. 4 (final) for the Black Duck Pumping Station. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution 04 -198 be approved. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -198 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE BLACK DUCK PUMPING STATION WHEREAS, the construction of the Black Duck Pumping Station has been completed by Northdale Construction Company and; WHEREAS, the two-year warranty period for this project began November 10, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Payment Number 4 (final) in the amount of $16,829.11 is approved for a total contract amount of $288,018.17. Adopted by the City Council this 20th day of December, 2004. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ann J. Blair, City Clerk SEH November 22, 2004 City of Lino Lakes Attn: Mr. Mike Grochala 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Black Duck Pumping Station Final Application for Payment SEH No. A- LINOL0203.01 r RECEIVED NOV 2 4 2004 CITY OF LINO LAKES Please find enclosed the Application for Payment No. 4 (Final) for the above - referenced project, together with the following documents: • IC -134 — Withholding Affidavit for Contractors ■ Consent of Surety to Final Payment • Affidavit regarding labor, materials, and contractors In review, the prime contractor, Northdale Construction Company, Inc., began this project in late summer of 2003 and had the sanitary sewer lift station operational at the end of November 2003. Final painting and punch list work was completed in 2004. The two-year warranty period for this lift station began November 10, 2004. The quantities completed to date have been reviewed and we hereby recommend approval for final payment to Northdale Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $16,829.11. We also recommend that the City assume perpetual maintenance of this lift station. Feel free to contact me directly at 651 490.2197 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, C,Y-arti Sean R. Clark, PE Project Manager nun Enclosures Lvmvmorn20301 a afignIkrety.cloc - 5 5 - Short FIf1n* 1.11r.nririr4enn 1„r.. 1C1% Vsr,r,s,c rrnrsr nriw. Cr Patti MN CC IIfI_CIQ. APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. 4 (FINAL) H No. A- LINOL0203.01 Location: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Northdale Construction Co., Inc. 14450 Northdale Blvd. Rogers, MN 55374 ntract for. Black Duck Pumping Station rplication te: November 15, 2004 riod ding. November 15, 2004 Contract Date: Contract Amount: $289,920.01 Owner: City of Lino Lakes, MN Item Est. Quantity Unit Qty to Date Unit Price Total MOBILIZATION LS 1 1 $56,500.00 $56,500.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 1 $2,500 00 $2,500.00 3 REMOVE BITUMINOUS IINOUS PAVEMENT SY 50 52 $6.00 5312.00 4 REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB SF 50 48 $10.00 $480.00 5 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 85 64 $6.00 $384.00 6 RECONSTRUCT WET WELL INVERT LS 1 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 1 ABANDON OR REMOVE 8 IN. SANITARY SEWER LF 110 110 $15.00 31,650.00 8 ABANDON EXISTING LS DRYWELL LS 1 1 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 9 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 6 IN. WATER MAIN LP 120 72 $3550 $2,556.00 10 BYPASS PUMPING LS 1 1 310,500.00 310,500.00 11 HAUL EXCESS BORROW MATERIAL LS 1 1 $2,275.00 $2,275.00 12 TYPE 41A WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (3 IN.) SY 175 184 $1950 $3,588.00 13 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 MODIFIED CY 50 53.4 $35.00 $1,869.00 14 ADJUST EXISTING MH CASTING EACH 1 1 $300.00 3300.00 15 SHEETING AND SHORING LS 1 1 31.00 31.00 16 DEWATERING LS 1 I $3,500.00 33,500.00 17 CRUSHED ROCK Y1 h. BEDDING CY 25 40 $30.00 $1,200.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MB EACH 1 1 33,500.00 $3,500.00 -56- Est. Quantity Item i nit Qty to Date Unit Price Total 19 CONNECT TO EXISTING FORCEMAIN EACH 1 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 20 SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 1 1 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 21 SUBMERS. WSTWTR. PUMPING STATION & CONTROLS LS 1 1 5113,300.00 $113,300.00 22 PAINTING LS 1 1 $6,84250 $6,842.50 23 18 IN. PVC PIPE SEWER, SDR 26 12 70 70 58033 $5,637.10 24 8114. PVC PIPE SEWER. DR 18, C -900 IF 20 20 $54.91 $1,098.20 25 8 IN. PVC PIPE SEWER, SDR 26 LF 15 18 $52.22 S939.96 26 12 IN. PVC INSIDE DROP 12 10 835 $269.23 $2,301.92 27 8 IN. PVC OUTSIDE DROP LP 11 11 $181.45 $1,995.95 28 8 IN. DIP PORCEMAIN, CL 52 12 25 25 $29.86 $74630 29 10 IN. BDPE, SDR 11, DIRECTIONAL DRILLED IF 60 653 5168.63 $11,045.27 30 36 IN. ST 3EL CASING PIPE, JACKED 12 45 45 $441.60 $19,872.00 'tl CUT IN 8 IN. 45 DEGREE DI BEND EACH 1 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 32 DIP FITTINGS LB 1000 715 $3.44 S2,459.60 33 12 IN. PIPE ADAPTER EACH 1 $489.18 $0.00 34 8 IN. PIPE ADAPTER EACH 1 1 $489.18 S489.18 35 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 LF 85 64 $20.00 $1,280.00 36 6 IN. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SF 120 126 $830 $1.071.00 37 6 IN. CONCRETE SLAB SF 75 75 $850 $637.50 38 SILT FENCE, PRE - ASSEMBLED LP 250 281 $5.00 $1,405.00 39 SOD, TYPE LAWN SY 800 833 $530 $4,581.50 40 TURF ESTABLISHMENT ACRE 0.4 0.4 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $288,018.17 SCHEDULE EDULE A TABULATION OF EQUIPMENT' ITEMS 02536 WSTWTR. PUMPING STATION - SUBMERSIBLE PUMF A. ABS NO BID 1950 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTRCRS A. SY/COM NO BID APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT - Continued Total Contract Amount $289,920.01 Total Amount Earned $288,018.17 Material Suitably Stored on Site, Not Incorporated into Work $0.00 Contract Change Order No. _ Percent Complete $0.00 Contract Change Order No. _ Percent Complete _ $0.00 Contract Change Order No. _ Percent Complete $0.00 GROSS AMOUNT DUB $288,018.17 LESS 0% RETAINAGE $0.00 AMOUNT DUE TO DATE $288,018.17 I PAS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS (5271,189.06) AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION $16,829.11 CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress payments received from the Owner on account of work performed under the Contract referred to above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge in full all obligations of the undersigned incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment under said contract, Black Duck Pumping Station, City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, and (2) aII material and equipment incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment and free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and encumbrances. Date 103 , C 20 0 COUNTY OF STATE OF ) SS .B Northdale Construction (Name) Before me on this / 7 clay of I L6 I,itAlt-li••ai . 20 f'a . personally appeare&L/t(Y -LU known to be, who being duly swan did depose and say that he/she is the owner of the Contractor above mentioned that he/she executed the above Application for Payment and Affidavit on behalf of said Contractor, and that all of the statements contained therein are true, correct and complete. • A-I 1 /7 My commission experts: _ /,z,. Petra ■ c • Cfr LA.GEUEY • .: ,.- ��jc -M NNESOTh •,:y ,,: ».C: ^ires Jan. 31,4007 ■ The undersigned has checked the Contractor's Application for Payment shown above. A part of this Application is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him under this contract have been applied by him to discharge in full all of his obligations in connection with the work by all prior Applications for Payment. In accordance with the Contract, the undersigned recommends approval of payment to the Contractor for the amount due. SEH 3535 V ednals Center Drive SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC. By . S �'e�a vri Daze Nov. 17, 2.00y SI - 5 8 -innosota 55110 Surranary Page AGENDA ITEM 6F STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 20, 2004 TOPIC: Resolution No. 04 -199, Authorizing Soil Borings for the construction of Well No. 5. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Water System Comprehensive Plan, construction of Well No. 5 identified Birch Park as a proposed location. The proposed site at Outlot F in the D. Erickson 2 "d Addition (across from the park) doesn't meet the Minnesota Department of Health requirement that the City own the land within 50' of the well. The adjacent property owner to the south is unwilling at this time to sell any property to the City. The City still wants to pursue this location as a future well location. City staff has reviewed the Birch Park area and did not find a location that would not impact the aesthetics or function of the park. City staff did identify an altemative location at Captain's Place within the Lakes Addition area (map attached). This site has been reviewed with the Health Department and found to be suitable while meeting flood plain and utility setback requirements. City staff is recommending that the soil borings that are typically done during the pumphouse design phase be performed at this time due to the proximity of the site to the flood plain. It is staffs recommendation to authorize the soil borings in the amount of $5,000.00 for the construction of Well No. 5. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 04 -199, Authorizing the Soil Borings for the construction of Well No. 5. 2. Retum to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 04-199 be adopted. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 04 -199 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SOIL BORINGS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WELL NO. 5. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Council adopting the Comprehensive Water System Plan on April 26, 2004, with reference to the first phases of improvement by constructing Well No. 5; and WHEREAS, the report provides information showing the proposed project is necessary, cost- effective, and feasible; and WHEREAS, the City's Engineer, TKDA, shall perform such services; and WHEREAS, the City proposes to use Trunk Area & Unit funds for all of the cost of the improvements, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: The City Engineer is designated as the engineer for this improvement and he is directed to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of Well No. 5. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 20th day of December, 2004. Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor - 60 - ME Rind IMMO EMI ib. • 50 FT, SETBAC PER WELL CO[ AO" 46121 -,1 f r h CITY OF LINO LAKES WELL NO. 5 ALTERNATE SITE PLAN TKDA 20C -h1 -1) BOO