Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/09/2007 Council PacketREVISED SUMMARY MINUTES CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday April 9, 2007 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) City Council: Mayor Bergeson, Council Members Carlson, O'Donnell, Reinert & Stoltz City Administrator: Gordon Heitke B©ARD'OF REVIEW, 6 :00 P.M. Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Council Chambers Call to Order and Roll Call at 6:07 p.m. — Present were Mayor Bergeson, Council Members O'Donnell, Reinert, Carlson and Stoltz Owners of properties at 7133 Sunrise Dr, 6832 Black Duck Dr and 6310 Otter Lake Rd addressed the board. Actions as follows: 6832 Black Duck Dr — Motion by Reinert, seconded by Carlson, to refer to Anoka County with request to review flood plain situation, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. 7133 Sunrise Dr — Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Reinert, to refer to Anoka County, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. 6310 Otter Lake Rd — Motion by Stoltz, seconded by O'Donnell, to refer to Anoka County, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. The Board of Review adjourned at 7:05 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEET ➢ Public Comment None ➢ Call to Order and Roll Call 7:10 p.m. — Present were Mayor Bergeson, Council Members O'Donnell, Reinert, Carlson and Stoltz ➢ Pledge of Allegiance ➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items The agenda was approved. Council Agenda -2- REVISED SUMMARY MINUTES CONSENT AGENDA A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) April 9, 2007 (Check No. 79758 through 79846) in the amount of $257,138.25; 4/09/2007 Pg 3 -16 B) Consider approval of March 26, 2007 Council Work Session Pg 17 Minutes C) Consider approval of March 26, 2007 City Council Meeting Pg 18 -20 Minutes Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1C, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, Al R©lek No report ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, Dan Teach:., A) First Reading of Ordinance No. 03 -07, Adding a new Chapter 615 to the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances relating to Special Event Permits, Julie Bartell roll call Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve 1St Reading of Ordinance No. 03 -07, was adopted by the following roll call vote: Yeas, 5; Nays none Pg 20a -f B) L.E.L.S (Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc) Labor Contract Pg 21 Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by Carlson, to approve the LELS Labor Contract as presented, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. C) Accept Resignation of Officer Martin Pg 22 Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by O'Donnell, to accept the resignation of Officer Martin, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. RTM I T I A) First Reading of Ordinance No. 02 -07, Repealing Chapter 807 Pg 22a -j of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances and adding a new Chapter 807 relating to the Operation of Snowmobiles and All Terrain Vehicles, Dave Pecchia roll call Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by Stoltz, to approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 02 -07, was adopted by the following roll call vote: Yeas, 5; Nays none. Council Agenda -3- REVISED SUMMARY MINUTES PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, Rick Det No reports 4/09/2007 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT, Michael Grochala • A) Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -51, Approving Joint Pg 23 -34 Powers Agreement with Anoka County, Lake Dr. /35W Interchange Improvements, Michael Grochala Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Reinert, to approve Resolution No. 07 -51 as presented, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. B) Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -52, Accepting Bids and Pg 35 -38 Awarding Contract, 2007 Sealcoat Project, Jim Studenski Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by Carlson, to approve Resolution No. 07 -52 as presented, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. C) Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -53, Accepting Bids and Pg 39 -45 Awarding Contract, 2007 Overlay Project, Jim Studenski Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve Resolution No. 07 -53 as presented, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. FlISHE D BUS None. None Adjourinm Et Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Carlson, to adjourn at 7:35 p.m., was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. Community Calendar - A Look Ahead April 10 — April 23, 2007 sit Wednesday, April 11 • Thursday, April 12 • Wednesday, April 18 Ak Monday, April 23 • Monday, April 23 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers 6:30 p.m., Community Room 6:30 p.m., Community Room 5:30 p.m., Community Room 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Planning & Zoning Charter Commission Comp Plan Advisory Grp Council Work Session Council Meeting CITY OF LINO LAKES ASSESSMENT NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization of the City /Township of Lino Lakes in Anoka County, Minnesota, will meet at Lino Lakes City Hall, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, in the City Council Chambers at 6:00 p.m. on April 9, 2007 for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of said City for the year 2007. All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment, or who wish to complain that the property of another is assessed too low, are hereby notified to appear at said meeting, and show cause of having such assessment corrected. No complaint that another person is assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed, or his agent, shall have been notified of such complaint. Given under my hand this 28th day of February, 2007. Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Julie Bartell So. p From: Julie Bartell Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:09 AM To: P ess Prtb ieatiorrhegals' ),e'r ISO I zoom • ne+- Cc: EtamartEfttsge; Joyce Lund; Editor @readthecitizen.com Subject: Public Meeting Notice Attachments: : a Ile Ma iciA Please print the attached notice in the(February 27, 2007 edition of the Quad Community Press and invoice the City of Lino Lakes. Please reply back with a confirmation of this e-mail. 03 -07 -07 it Mtg with Bds re Co... Thank you. Joyce, please code to 101- 402 - 4340 -000. Julie Barte City City of Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 651- 982 -2406 651 -982 -2499 fax julie.bartell@cilino-lakes.mn.us Julie Bartell City Clerk City of Lino Laps 600 Town Cerker Parkway Lino Lakes, MIV 55014 651- 982 -2406 651 - 982- 2499Ifax julie.bartell@yilino-lakes.mn.us 1 Art 4 ?e 0'9 ASSESSMENT NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization of the City /Township of Lino Lakes in Anoka County, Minnesota, will meet at the Office of the Clerk in said City /Township at 6:00 P.M., on the 9th of April, 2007 for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of said City for the year 2007. All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment, or who wish to complain that the property of another is assessed too low, are hereby notified to appear at said meeting, and show cause of having such assessment corrected. No complaint that another person is assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed, or his agent, shall have been notified of such complaint. Given under my hand this day of , 2007. Clerk of the City /Township of Lino Lakes C O U N T Y O F A N O K A February 22, 2007 DIVISION OF PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION GOVERNMENT CENTER • 2100 3RD AVENUE • ANOKA, MN 55303 FAX (763) 323 -5421 Ms. Julianne Bartell Lino Lakes City Hall 600 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes, MN 55014 www.AnokaCounty.us/prop-records-tax • Property Assessment • Property Records and Public Service • Property Tax Accounting and Research Re: 2007 Assessment Notice for Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Dear Ms. Bartell, Enclosed is the Assessment Notice for your 2007 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. Please publish and post this notice at least 10 days before the date of the meeting in compliance with state statute. Sincerely, rY\aA..ur--'b&-tdrLi Mary Boyle Principal Appraiser Anoka County PRT - Assessing Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer ANOKA COUNTY 2007 LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION COUNTY ASSESSOR'S REPORT Anoka County City of Lino Lakes Table of Contents Agenda 1 Assessment Calendar 2 The 2007 Assessment 3 Quintile Map 4 Reassessment 5 Market Value 5 Authority of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization 6 Market Values 10 2007 Market Value by Property Class 11 Residential Appraisal System 13 Sales Studies 14 Sales Statistics Defined 14 Current Sales Study Statistics 15 2007 Anoka County Ratio Study 16 Residential Ratio by Zones 17 Residential Tax Changes Examined 18 ADDENDA 19 Statutes 20 Appraisal Terminology 51 Appeals Procedure 57 Sample Market Value Notice 59 Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors® 2005 Residential Real Estate Activity Report . 61 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 2007 Board of Review Agenda Apra 9, 2007 1. Call the Board of Review to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Read Official Notice of the Board of Review 4. Board Chair outlines the ground rules for the meeting. The specific ground rules may vary for each local board but should include: Purpose of the meeting; `-■ Remind property owners that only appeals for the current year valuation or classification may be made. The 2007 board is to review the assessment as of January 2, 2007, which will be used to compute the property taxes payable in 2008. Prior years' assessments or taxes (including taxes payable in 2007) are not within the jurisdiction of the board; The order of the appellants - by appointment first, followed by walk -ins on a first -come basis. The board will also receive written appeals from property owners. The secretary will record the required information (name, mailing address, telephone number, and address of property, etc.) The expectations of the appellant when presenting their appeal (i.e. the appeal must be substantiated by facts; where the appellant should stand or sit; the appellant should be prepared to answer questions posed by the board, etc.); Time limits imposed (if any); The procedure the board will follow for making decisions (Will the board hear all appeals before making any decisions? Will the board send a letter to appellants to inform them of the decision? Etc.) The Board may correct any erroneous valuation and add any omission of properties or increase of value after due process. The total decrease of valuations may not exceed one percent of the total valuation of the taxing district; 5. The Board Chair should give the assessor the opportunity to present a brief overview of the property tax process and a recap of the current assessment. 6. Appellants should then present their appeals to the board. If the assessor has had a chance to review the property prior to the meeting, the assessor can present facts and information either supporting the valuation and or classification, or recommend that the board make a change. If the assessor has not had a chance to review the property prior to the meeting, the board may ask the assessor to review the property and present his /her findings to the board at a reconvene meeting. 7. Recess or Close the Meeting. If needed, the meeting will be reconvened at a date to be determined. The Board of Appeal and Equalization of any city, unless a longer period is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue, must complete its work and adjourn within twenty days from the time of convening specified in the notice of the clerk. No action taken subsequent to such date shall be valid. 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Assessment Staff Residential Appraisers Linda Wiener Commercial Industrial Appraiser John Leone Apartment Appraiser Jim Rouleau Anoka County Assessor Mike Sutherland 2007 Assessment Calendar Jan 2 2007 Market Values for Property Established Feb 1 Final Day to Deliver Assessment Records to County Feb 1 Final Day to File for an Exemption from Taxation Mar 1 Final day to file for 1B with Commissioner of Revenue Mar 12 2007 Valuation Notices Mailed Apr 9 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Apr 30 Final Day to File a Tax Court Petition for 2006 Assessment May 1 Final day to file application for Green Acres May 15 First Half Payable 2007 Taxes Due May 29 Final Date for Manufactured Homes assessed as personal property to establish homestead May 31 State Board of Equalization Jun 18 County Board of Appeal and Equalization Jul 1 2007 Assessment Finalized Jul 1 Date by which taxable property becomes exempt Aug 15 Final Day to File for 2006 Property Tax Refund Aug 31 Final Day to Pay the First Half Manufactured Home Taxes Sep 1 2007 Abstract to the Department of Revenue Oct 15 Second Half Pay 2007 Taxes Due Nov 15 Final Day to Mail 2008 Proposed Tax Notices Dec 15 Final Day to File Homestead Application for 2007 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes The 2007 Assessment The 2007 assessment should be a reflection of the 2006 market conditions. Sales of property are constantly analyzed to chart the activity of the market place. The Assessing staff does not create value; they only measure its movement. Assessing property values equitably is part science, part judgment and part communication skill. Training as an assessor cannot tell us how to find the "perfect" value of a property, but it does help us consistently produce the same estimate of value for identical properties. That after all, is the working definition of equalization. As of January 2, 2007, there were 7,846 parcels in the City (including manufactured homes). That is an increase of 223 or 2.9% over the 2006 parcel count. This total includes: 6,682 residential parcels 594 exempt parcels 243 commercial and industrial parcels 194 agricultural parcels 94 manufactured homes 24 tax forfeit (<1%) 8 utility (<1%) 4 personal property (<1%) 3 apartment (<1%) Distribution of Parcels by Property Type Residential 85.2% It Exempt) 7.6% Commercial Industrial I 3.1% Agricultural 2.5% Manufactured Homes 1.2% All Other 0.5% Anoka County City of LinoLakes Current state law mandates that all property must be re- assessed each year and physically reviewed once every five years. We also inspect all properties with new construction each year. During 2006 there were over 1,818 properties reviewed including 75 new homes built in 2006. City of Lino Lakes 36 31 32 12 13 18 3 1 34 5 4 8 24 19 17 20 9 35 36 3 2 1 10 11 16 15 21 22 23 U 29 28 27 26 12 13 24 25 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 City Boundary 2006 Re- Assessment Area 2007 Projected Re- Assessment Area Section Lines ,a'PnJec.^.6,•Prtper1 Remrtls This map illustrates the 2006 (2007 assessment for pay 2008) review area and the projected review area for 2007 (2008 assessment for pay 2009). 4 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes ' Reassessment State Statute reads: "All real property subject to taxation shall be ' listed and reassessed every year with reference to its value on January 2nd preceding the assessment." This has been done, and the owners of property in Lino Lakes have been notified of any value change. ' Minnesota Statute 273.11 reads: "All property shall be valued at its market value." It further states that "In estimating and determining such value, the Assessor shall not adopt a lower or different ' standard of value because the same is to serve as a basis for taxation, nor shall the assessor adopt as a criterion of value the price for which such property would sell at auction or at a forced sale, or in the aggregate with all the property in the town or district; but the assessor shall value each article or description of property by itself, and at such sum or price as the assessor believes the ' same to be fairly worth in money." The Statute says all property shall be valued at market value, not may be valued at market value. This means that no factors other than market factors should affect the Assessor's value and the subsequent action by the Board of Appeal and 1 Equalization. Market Value ' Market value has been defined many different ways. One way used by many appraisers is the following: ' The most probable price that a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by any undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the 1 consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1 (1) buyer and seller are typically motivated: (2) both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (3) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 1 (4) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; (5) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Anoka County City of LinoLakes Authority of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization 1 Assessments of property are made to provide the means for the measuring of the relative share of each taxpayer in meeting the costs of local government. It is the duty of the Assessor to assess all real and personal property except that which is exempt or taxable under some special method of taxation. If the burden of local government is to be fairly and justly shared among the owners of all property of value, it is necessary that all taxable property be listed on the tax rolls and that all assessments be made accurately. Whenever any property that should be assessed is omitted from the tax rolls, an unfair burden falls upon the owners of all property that has been assessed. If any property is undervalued in relation to the other property on the assessment record, the owners of the other property are called upon automatically to assume part of the tax burden that should be borne by the undervalued property. Fairness and justice in property taxation demands both completeness and equality in assessment. Minnesota Statutes Section 274.01 provides that the council of each city shall be or appoint a Board of Appeal and Equalization. The charter of certain cities provides for the establishment of a Board of Equalization. The provisions of Section 274.01 and this regulation apply to all Boards of Appeal or Boards of Equalization. The 2003 Legislature enacted State Statute 274.014 which requires that there be at least one member at each meeting of a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization (beginning with the 2006 local boards) who has attended an appeals and equalization course developed or approved by the Commissioner of Revenue within the last four years. (The member must attend the course by no later than January 1, 2006 and each year thereafter.) Section 274.01 states the county assessor shall fix a date for each Board of Appeal and Equalization to meet for the purpose of reviewing the assessment of property in its respective town or city. The county assessor is required to serve written notice to the clerk of each of such bodies on or before February 15th of each year. These meetings are required to be held between April 1st and May 31st; 1 and the clerk of the Board of Appeal and Equalization is required to give published and posted notice at least ten days before the date set for the first meeting. 1 1 6 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes The Board of Appeal and Equalization of any city, unless a longer period is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue, must complete its work and adjourn within twenty days from the time of convening specified in the notice of the clerk. No action taken subsequent to ' such date shall be valid. A request for additional time in order to complete the work of the Board of ' Appeal and Equalization must be addressed to the Commissioner of Revenue in writing. The Commissioner's approval is necessary to legalize any procedure subsequent to the expiration of the twenty -day ' period. The Commissioner of Revenue will not, however, extend the time for local Boards of Appeal and Equalization to meet beyond the time when the County Board of Equalization meets, which is the Final two weeks of June. The authority of the local Board extends over the individual assessments ' of real and personal property. The Board does not have the power to increase or decrease by percentage all of the assessments in the district of a given class of property. Changes in aggregate assessments by classes are made by the County Board of Equalization. Although the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization has the authority to increase or reduce individual assessments, the total of such adjustments ' must not reduce the aggregate assessment made by the Assessor by more than one percent of said aggregate assessment. If the total of such adjustments does lower the aggregate assessment made by the ' Assessor by more than one percent, none of the adjustments will be allowed. This limitation does not apply, however, to the correction of clerical errors or to the removal of duplicate assessments. 1 The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization does not have the authority in any year to reopen former assessments on which taxes ' are due and payable. The Board considers only the assessments that are in process in the current year. Adjustment can be made only by the process of abatement or by legal action. In reviewing the individual assessments, the Board may find instances of undervaluation . Before the Board can raise the market value of property it must notify the owner. The law does not prescribe any ' particular form of notice except that the person whose property is to be increased in value must be notified of the intent of the Board to make the increase. The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meetings assure a property owner an opportunity to contest any other matter relating to the taxability of their property. The Board is required to review the matter and make any corrections that it deems just. Anoka County City of LinoLakes When a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization convenes, it is necessary 1 that a majority of the members be in attendance in order that any valid action may be taken. The local assessor is required by law to be present with his /her assessment books and papers. He /she is required also to take part in the proceedings but has no vote. In addition to the local I assessor, the county assessor or one of his /her assistants is required to attend. The Board should proceed immediately to review the assessments of property. The Board should ask the local assessor and I county assessor to present any tables that have been prepared, making comparisons of the current assessments in the district. The county assessor is required to have maps and tables relating particularly to land I values for the guidance of Boards of Appeal and Equalization. Comparisons should be presented of assessments of types of property with previous years and with other assessment districts in the same I county. It is the primary duty of each Board of Appeal and Equalization to Iexamine the assessment record to see that all taxable property in the assessment district has been properly placed upon the list and valued by the assessor. In case any property, either real or personal, has been omitted; the Board has the duty of making the assessment. The complaints and objections of persons who feel aggrieved with any assessments for the current year should be considered very carefully by I the Board. Such assessments must be reviewed in detail and the Board has the authority to make corrections it deems to be just. The Board may recess from day to day until all cases have been heard. If complaints are I received after the adjournment of the Board of Appeal and Equalization they must be handled on the staff level; as a property owner cannot appear before a higher board unless he or she has first appeared at I the lower board levels. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 274.01: The Board may not make an Iindividual market value adjustment or classification change that would benefit the property in cases where the owner or other person having control over the property will not permit the assessor to inspect the property and the interior of any buildings or structures. 1 A non - resident may file written objections to his /her assessment with the county assessor prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeal and I Equalization. Such objections must be presented to the Board for consideration while it is in session. 1 1 1 1 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Before adjourning, the Board of Appeal and Equalization should cause the record of the official proceedings to be prepared. The law requires that the proceedings be listed on a separate form which is appended to the assessment book. The assessments of omitted property must be 1 listed in detail and all assessments that have been increased or decreased should be shown as prescribed in the form. After the proceedings have been completed, the record should be signed and ' dated by the members of the Board of Appeal and Equalization. It is the duty of the county assessor to enter changes by Boards of Appeal and Equalization in the assessment book of each district. 1 The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization has the opportunity of making a great contribution to the equality of all assessments of property in a district. No other agency in the assessment process has the knowledge of the property within a district that is possessed jointly by the individual members of a Board of Appeal and Equalization. The County ' or State Board of Equalization cannot give the detailed attention to individual assessments that is possible in the session of the Local Board. The faithful performance of duty by the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization will make a direct contribution to the attainment of equality in meeting the costs of providing the essential services of local government. The 2007 assessment should be a reflection of the 2006 market conditions. Sales of property are constantly analyzed to chart the activity of the market 1 place. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Market Values After thorough studies of the sales in the market place are conducted, we establish the assessed value of all real property. During the 2006 study period, we recorded 8,256 sales countywide (down 18% from the 2005 study period), of which we considered 4,563 "arms- length" sales. In accordance with the results of these sales studies, certain areas of the city and certain styles and grades of homes may have been adjusted in value, either lower or higher than the previous year's value. This will more properly reflect current market trends. The 2007 assessment that is up for your review has a total unaudited assessed value of $2,058,730,700, excluding exempt, forfeit, utility, manufactured homes and personal property. It reflects an approximate valuation increase of 4.6% over the 2006 assessment. The pattern of growth (including new construction) in the City's total value can be seen in the following list and chart: Growth in Property Values 2004-2007 (Total does not include manufactured homes, personal property, utilities, exempt, or forfeit) Year Residential Commercial Agricultural Apartment Total % Chg Industrial 2007 $1,797,691,400 $185,403,200 $70,192,600 $5,443,500 $2,058,730,700 4.6% 2006 $1,733,553,000 $167,297,500 $61,414,200 $5,352,000 $1,967,616,700 5.5% 2005 $1,626,502,100 $149,418,900 $83,958,800 $5,058,300 $1,864,938,100 13.9% 2004 $1,426,776,000 $123,115,600 $82,026,700 $4,863,000 $1,636,781,300 NA Total Market Value $2,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $500,000,000 $0 2007 2006 2005 Assessment Year Residential u Commercial Industrial 2004 Residential indudes all property dassified Residential, Agricultural and Apartment. Commercial Industrial indudes all property dassified Commercial, Industrial and Manufactured Horne Park. Anoka County City of LinoLakes VALUE GROWTH On the next two pages are more detailed breakdowns of changes in the 2007 assessment as compared to prior years. The first example is the gross change in estimated market value by classification from the 2005 assessment for tax payable 2006 to the 2007 assessment for tax payable 2008. The second example is the net change in estimated market value by classification, not including new construction, from the 2006 assessment for tax payable 2007 to the 2007 assessment for tax payable 2008. GROWTH IN ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES BY PROPERTY TYPE 2005 TO 2007 ASSESSMENT YEARS FOR TAXES PAYABLE 2006 TO 2008 2005 PAY 2006 2006 PAY 2007 2007 PAY 2008 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE PROPERTY TYPE Residential Commercial Industrial Agricultural Apartment Total $1,800,000,000 $1,600,000,000 $1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $800,000,000 $600,000,000 $400,000,000 $200,000,000 $0 $1,626,502,100 $148,418,900 $83,958,800 $5,058,300 $1,863,938,100 $1,733,553,000 $167,297,500 $61,414,200 $5,352,000 $1,967,616,700 $1,797,691,400 $185,403,200 $70,192,600 $5,443,500 $2,058,730,700 GROWTH IN ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE BY PROPERTY TYPE WWI wpm 2006 2007 2008 TAX PAYABLE YEAR — Residential Commercial Industrial Agricultural Apartment 11 17 Anoka County City of LinoLakes NET Q -IANGE IN ESTIMATED MALT VALUE FOR TAXABLE PROPERi1 ES 2006 PAY 2007 2007 PAY 2006 2007 PAY 2006 2007 PAY 2008 2007 PAY 2C08 2007 PAY 2006 GROSS EIVN % NEW GROSS GRO6S PROPERTY TYPE ESTIMATED BEFORE NEW MN INCLUDING INPROVENBYF ESTIMATED %OF CHANGE MARKET VALUE INPRCM3VBJTS NEW VALUE NAT VPLLE INPRCM3VENTS Ppartrrertt $5,T52,003 $5,443,500 1.7% $0 $5,443,500 1.7% Agriaibial $61,414,200 $70,027,200 14.0x/a $165,400 $70,192600 14.3% CanTendai Indtsl ial $167,297,500 $179,236,100 7.2% $5,137,100 $185,403,200 10.8x/0 Residenfial $1,733,553,000 $1,767,711,700 20x/o $29,979,700 $1,797,691,4W 3.7% Tou $1,967,616,700 $2022,448,500 2.8% $36,26200 $2,058,730,700 4.6'% Residential I _ 87.3% DISTRIBUTION OF VALUE BY PROPERTY TYPE Apartment 0.3% Agricultural 3.4% Commercial Industrial 9.0% Anoka County City of LinoLakes Residential Appraisal System Per State Statute, each property must be physically inspected and individually appraised once every five years. For this individual appraisal, or in the event of an assessed value appeal, we use two standard appraisal methods to determine and verify the estimated market value of our residential properties: 1. First, an appraiser inspects each property to verify data. If we are unable to view the interior of a home on the first visit, a tag is left requesting a return telephone call from the owner to schedule this inspection. Interior inspections are necessary to confirm our data on the plans and specifications of new homes and to determine depreciation factors in older homes. 2. To calculate the estimated market value from the property data we use a Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal (CAMA) system based on a reconstruction less depreciation method of appraisal. The cost variables and land schedules are developed through an anlaysis of stratified sales within the city. This method uses the "Principle of Substitution" and calculates what a buyer would have to pay to replace each home today less age dependent depreciation. 3. A comparative market analysis is used to verify these estimates. The properties used for these studies are those that most recently have sold and by computer analysis, are most comparable to the subject property taking into consideration construction quality, location, size, style, etc. The main point in doing a market analysis is to make sure that you are comparing "apples with apples ". This will make the comparable properties "equivalent to" the subject property and establish a probable sale price of the subject. These three steps give us the information to verify assessed value or to adjust it if necessary. The following pages contain an example of the appraisal information for one property. They include data calculations, plan sketch, photo, comparative analysis, and photos and a map of comparable properties. 13 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Sales Studies According to State Law, it is the assessor's job to appraise all real property at market value for property tax purposes. As a method of checks and balances, the Department of Revenue uses statistics and ratios relating to assessed market value and current sale prices to confirm that the law is upheld. Assessors use similar statistics and sales ratios to identify market trends in developing market values. A sales ratio is obtained by comparing the assessor's market value to the adjusted sales price of each property sold in an arms - length transaction within a fixed period. An "arms- length" transaction is one that is generated after a property has had sufficient time on the open market, between both an informed buyer and seller with no undue pressure on either party. The median or mid -point ratios are calculated and stratified by property classification. 100% The only perfect assessment would have a 100% ratio for every sale. This is of course, impossible. Because we are not able to predict major events that may cause significant shifts in the market, the state allows a 15% margin of error. The Department of Revenue adjusts the median ratio by the percentage of growth from the previous year's abstract value of the same class of property within the same jurisdiction. This adjusted median ratio must fall between 90% and 105 %. Any deviation will warrant a state mandated jurisdiction -wide adjustment of at least 5 %. To avoid this increase, the Anoka County Assessor requests a median sales ratio of 94.5 %. In Anoka County, we have the ability to stratify the ratios by style, age, quality of construction, size, land zone and value. This assists us in appraising all of our properties closer to our goal ratio. Sales Statistics Defined In addition to the median ratio, we have the ability to develop other statistics to test the accuracy of the assessment. Some of these are used at the state and county level also. The primary statistics used are: 14 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 1 Aggregate Ratio: This is the total market value of all sale properties divided by the total sale prices. It, along with the mean ratio, gives an idea of our assessment level. Within the city, we constantly try to achieve an aggregate and mean ratio of 94% to 95% to give us a margin to account for a fluctuating market and still maintain ratios within state mandated guidelines. 1 Mean Ratio: The mean is the average ratio. We use this ratio not only to watch our assessment level, but also to analyze property values by development, type of dwelling and value range. These studies enable us to track market trends in neighborhoods, popular housing types and classes of property. Coefficient of Dispersion (COD): The COD measures the accuracy of the 1 assessment. It is possible to have a median ratio of 93% with 300 sales, two ratios at 93 %, 149 at 80% and 149 at 103 %. Although this is an excellent median ratio, there is obviously a great inequality in the assessment. The COD indicates the spread of the ratios from the mean or median ratio. The goal of a good assessment is a COD of 10 to 20. A COD under 10 is 1 considered excellent and anything over 20 will mean an assessment review by the Department of Revenue. Price Related Differential (PRD): This statistic measures the equality between the assessment of high and low valued property. A PRD over 100 indicates a regressive assessment, or the lower valued properties are assessed at a greater degree than the higher. A PRD of less than 100 indicates a progressive assessment or the opposite. A perfect PRD of 100 means that both higher and lower valued properties are assessed exactly equal. Current Sales Study Statistics The following statistics are based upon ratios calculated using 2006 pay 2007 market values and 2005 sales. These are the ratios that our office uses for citywide equalizations, checking assessment accuracy, and predicting trends in 1 the market. 1 2006 Anoka County Residential Sales Ratio 1 Statistics Median Ratio 94.54 1 Aggregate Ratio 94.33 Mean Ratio 95.23 COD on Median 6.34 PRD 101 1 1 15 1 1 Anoka County 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of LinoLakes Anoka County Ratio Study - 2007 Assessment Residential Single Family Sales Ratio History 2007 -1998 Assessment Year Municipality 2007 # Median Coeff 2006 # Median Coeff 2005 # Median Coeff 2004 # Median Coeff 2003 # Median Coeff Andover 370 93.3 4.9 550 94.5 4.2 591 95.4 23.6 479 94.4 3.6 531 94.6 3.2 Anoka 223 94.4 6.7 257 94.9 7.1 330 94.4 6.8 213 94.5 5.4 233 94.5 5.6 Bethel 10 91.1 4.8 8 94.5 7.4 23 99.9 27.7 7 94.4 2.4 8 94.3 5.4 Blaine 868 93.6 5.5 1007 94.4 5.5 1428 95.7 17.6 900 94.4 5.4 845 94.5 4.9 Burns 35 90.5 9.0 44 94.2 5.2 91 95.2 51.8 77 94.5 9.2 50 94.4 8.4 Centerville 75 93.6 7.5 84 94.7 6.3 106 93.7 9.1 74 94.3 5.5 77 94.5 6.4 Circle Pines 70 96.7 5.5 91 94.6 4.8 174 94.6 7.5 52 94.4 4.1 58 94.5 7.2 Columbia Heights 294 94.0 7.3 380 94.6 8.3 383 91.9 11.5 255 94.3 7.0 263 94.4 7.0 Columbus 29 96.4 11.2 29 99.8 18.2 40 93.3 9.3 27 94.2 6.7 32 94.6 7.4 Coon Rapids 1000 93.7 5.2 1268 94.5 5.8 1488 94.3 36.6 793 94.4 5.4 801 94.4 5.5 East Bethel 137 97.2 5.9 176 95.7 17.7 202 92.0 13.8 169 94.7 7.4 139 94.6 7.3 Fridley 317 93.4 6.1 429 94.7 8.4 441 98.0 7.7 290 94.5 6.5 260 94.5 6.1 Ham Lake 182 93.8 7.6 191 94.5 6.4 312 97.0 43.4 232 94.3 5.4 208 94.4 7.0 Hilltop 1 86.0 0.0 3 93.0 1.4 3 93.0 18.1 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 Lexington 25 92.9 9.3 30 94.3 7.2 23 95.2 7.9 14 94.6 4.1 21 94.5 4.9 Lino Lakes 235 94.4 8.8 276 94.6 6.5 284 92.5 17.6 264 94.4 7.1 329 94.4 7.4 Linwood 85 91.0 16.2 68 94.4 9.3 75 94.3 23.5 66 94.4 7.4 86 94.5 7.1 Oak Grove 94 93.2 11.3 116 94.9 8.4 129 97.0 11.8 109 94.6 6.4 116 94.4 8.5 Ramsey 315 93.7 6.9 379 94.6 6.7 561 95.7 13.7 351 94.4 6.6 308 94.4 6.0 Spring Lake Park 69 96.1 4.8 87 94.5 8.8 112 94.9 6.4 71 94.4 4.3 77 94.5 4.4 St. Francis 129 93.7 4.3 158 94.7 4.3 203 96.9 31.7 250 94.4 5.0 155 94.5 5.9 County Total 4,563 93.8 6.3 5,632 94.5 6.3 7,000 95.2 21.7 4,693 94.4 5.7 4,597 94.5 5.9 Price Related Differential 99 101 111 101 101 Assessment Year Municipality 2002 # Median Coeff 2001 # Median Coeff 2000 # Median Coeff 1999 # Median Coeff 1998 # Median Coeff Andover 683 94.6 7.6 565 94.3 7.1 722 94.5 4.9 458 94.3 5.8 448 94.5 5.2 Anoka 206 94.5 6.2 204 94.4 7.2 218 94.5 7.5 240 94.4 6.2 207 94.3 6.2 Bethel 8 94.5 2.0 3 94.3 1.8 7 94.5 5.2 5 94.4 7.2 5 94.4 8.6 Blaine 906 94.5 6.7 713 94.4 5.1 859 94.4 4.7 810 94.3 4.2 583 94.3 4.3 Burns 45 94.4 8.7 48 94.4 10.4 48 94.4 4.6 29 94.5 3.1 21 94.4 6.3 Centerville 82 94.5 5.8 53 94.4 5.0 92 94.4 5.8 96 94.4 3.5 53 94.3 5.2 Circle Pines 54 94.5 6.5 58 94.3 6.9 61 94.5 3.4 53 94.4 4.4 50 94.3 4.3 Columbia Heights 255 94.4 7.3 228 94.3 8.2 232 94.5 6.8 225 94.3 5.6 208 94.3 7.2 Columbus 44 94.2 7.5 27 94.4 7.9 31 94.5 9.9 34 94.4 5.6 40 94.7 7.1 Coon Rapids 811 94.5 5.4 790 94.4 6.3 947 94.4 6.0 799 94.3 5.1 733 94.3 4.7 East Bethel 186 94.5 8.1 208 94.4 5.9 174 94.4 5.9 189 94.3 6.7 168 94.4 6.4 Fridley 259 94.4 7.2 242 94.4 7.0 274 94.4 7.8 293 94.3 5.6 248 94.4 6.2 Ham Lake 267 94.5 7.8 225 94.4 5.7 227 94.4 5.3 199 94.3 5.0 178 94.5 5.7 Hilltop 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 1 94.2 0.0 1 95.3 0.0 Lexington 12 93.8 4.9 17 94.4 7.5 21 94.5 4.4 14 94.4 4.5 15 94.2 3.6 Lino Lakes 402 94.4 8.8 295 94.4 5.4 324 94.4 4.6 305 94.3 4.9 296 94.4 4.6 Linwood 64 94.4 7.2 50 94.4 6.6 82 94.4 5.7 76 94.4 5.6 64 94.0 7.5 Oak Grove 100 94.4 9.2 85 94.4 6.6 111 94.5 4.8 79 94.5 4.2 81 94.5 5.5 Ramsey 339 94.4 6.3 318 94.4 5.9 407 94.5 4.1 458 94.4 5.0 367 94.6 4.7 Spring Lake Park 91 94.5 5.9 63 94.4 6.0 81 94.5 6.0 75 94.5 4.4 82 94.2 5.0 St. Francis 157 94.4 7.2 107 94.4 6.1 182 94.4 3.7 78 94.5 3.6 59 94.5 4.2 County Total 4,971 94.4 6.8 4,299 94.4 6.1 5,100 94.4 5.4 4,516 94.4 5.2 3,907 94.4 5.2 Price Related Differential 101 100 100 100 100 16 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 1 2007 Lino Lakes Residential Ratio by Zones 1 Number Median Coefficient 1 Neighborhood Neighborhood of Sales of Code Description Sales Ratio Dispersion 1 LL01 -0 2.5 & 5 AC TRACTS 3 95.6 5.6 LL01 -1 "00 & NEWER EXECUTIVE 26 95.3 6.7 1 LL01 -2 1950 "S & 1960 "S 6 95.2 4.6 LL01 -3 1990 "S & 2000 "S 56 93.6 4.9 1 LL01 -4 1970 "S & 1980 "S 22 92.1 6.8 I LL01 -5 LAKESHORE 9 85.9 11.0 LL01 -6 AG LAND 0 NA NA I LL01 -7 EXECUTIVE 18 94.9 6.5 LL01 -8 MIDRANGE 40 99.5 6.4 1 LL01 -9 LINO LAKES TOWNHOMES 50 93.2 5.2 NATURE CONSERVATION AREA I LLO1 -10 PLATS 2 82.0 1.4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Residential Tax Changes Examined Although the Assessor's Office is considered by many to be the primary reason for any property tax changes there are actually several elements that can contribute to this change, including, but not limited to: • Changes in the approved levies of individual taxing jurisdictions. • Bond referendum approvals. • Tax rate changes approved by the State Legislature. • Changes to the homestead credit, educational credits and agricultural aid. • Changes in assessed market value. • Changes in the classification of the property. A combination of any of these factors can bring about a change in the annual property tax bill. If you have questions, please call 763- 323 -5400. 18 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 1 ADDENDA 19 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Statutes Minnesota State Statute 273.11 Valuation of Property Minnesota State Statute 273.121 Valuation of Real Property Notice Minnesota State Statute 273.13 Classification of Property Minnesota State Statute 274.01 Board of Appeal and Equalization Minnesota State Statute 274.014 Local Boards; Appeals and Equalization Course and Meeting Requirements 20 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 273.11 VALUATION OF PROPERTY. I Subdivision 1. Generally. Except as provided in this section or section 273.17, subdivision 1 , all property shall be valued at its market value. The market value as determined pursuant to this section shall be stated such that any amount under $100 is rounded up to $100 and any amount exceeding $100 shall be rounded to the nearest $100. In estimating and determining such value, the assessor shall not adopt a lower or different standard of value because the same is to serve as a basis of taxation, nor shall the assessor adopt as a criterion of value the price for which such property would sell at a forced sale, or in the aggregate with all the property in the town or district; but the assessor shall value each article or description of property by itself, and at such sum or price as the assessor believes the same to be fairly worth in money. The assessor shall take into account the effect on the market value of property of environmental factors in the vicinity of the property. In assessing any tract or lot of real property, the value of the land, exclusive of structures and improvements, shall be determined, and also the value of all structures and improvements thereon, and the aggregate value of the property, including all structures and improvements, excluding the value of crops growing upon cultivated land. In valuing real property upon which there is a mine or quarry, it shall be valued at such price as such property, including the mine or quarry, would sell for at a fair, voluntary sale, for cash, if the material being mined or quarried is not subject to taxation under section 298.015 and the mine or quarry is not exempt from the general property tax under section 298.25. In valuing real property which is vacant, platted property shall be assessed as provided in subdivision 14. All property, or the use thereof, which is taxable under section 272.01, subdivision 2, or 273.19, shall be valued at the market value of such property and not at the value of a leasehold estate in such property, or at some lesser value than its market value. Subd. 1 a. Limited market value. In the case of all property classified as agricultural homestead or nonhomestead, residential homestead or nonhomestead, timber, or noncommercial seasonal residential recreational, the assessor shall compare the value with the taxable portion of the value determined in the preceding assessment. For assessment years 2004, 2005, and 2006, the amount of the increase shall not exceed the greater of (1) 15 percent of the value in the preceding assessment, or (2) 25 percent of the difference between the current assessment and the preceding assessment. For assessment year 2007, the amount of the increase shall not exceed the greater of (1) 15 percent of the value in the preceding assessment, or (2) 33 percent of the difference between the current assessment and the preceding assessment. For assessment year 2008, the amount of the increase shall not exceed the greater of (1) 15 percent of the value in the preceding assessment, or (2) 50 percent of the difference between the current assessment and the preceding assessment. This limitation shall not apply to increases in value due to improvements. For purposes of this 21 Anoka County City of LinoLakes subdivision, the term "assessment" means the value prior to any exclusion under subdivision 16. The provisions of this subdivision shall be in effect through assessment year 2008 as provided in this subdivision. For purposes of the assessment/sales ratio study conducted under section 127A.48, and the computation of state aids paid under chapters 122A, 123A, 123B, 124D, 125A, 126C, 127A, and 477A, market values and net tax capacities determined under this subdivision and subdivision 16, shall be used. Subd. 2.[Repealed, 1979 c 303 art 2 s 38] Subd. 3.[Repealed, 1975 c 437 art 8 s 10] Subd. 4.[Repealed, 1976 c 345 s 3] Subd. 5. Boards of review and equalization. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the limitation contained in subdivisions 1 and 1 a shall also apply to the authority of the local board of review as provided in section 274.01, the county board of equalization as provided in section 274.13, the State Board of Equalization and the commissioner of revenue as provided in sections 270.11, subdivision 1, 270.12, 270C.92, and 270C.94. Subd. 6. Solar, wind, methane gas systems. For purposes of property taxation, the market value of real and personal property installed prior to January 1, 1984, which is a solar, wind, or agriculturally derived methane gas system used as a heating, cooling, or electric power source of a building or structure shall be excluded from the market value of that building or structure if the property is not used to provide energy for sale. Subd. 6a. Fire - safety sprinkler systems. For purposes of property taxation, the market value of automatic fire - safety sprinkler systems installed in existing buildings after January 1, 1992, meeting the standards of the Minnesota Fire Code shall be excluded from the market value of (1) existing multifamily residential real estate containing four or more units and used or held for use by the owner or by the tenants or lessees of the owner as a residence and (2) existing real estate containing four or more contiguous residential units for use by customers of the owner, such as hotels, motels, and lodging houses and (3) existing office buildings or mixed use commercial- residential buildings, in which at least one story capable of occupancy is at least 75 feet above the ground. The market value exclusion under this section shall expire if the property is sold. Subd. 7.[Repealed, 1984 c 502 art 3 s 36] Subd. 8. Limited equity cooperative apartments. For the purposes of this subdivision, the terms defined in this subdivision have the meanings given them. A "limited equity cooperative" is a corporation organized under chapter 308A or 308B, which has as its primary purpose the provision of housing and related services to its members which meets one of the following criteria with respect to the income of its members: (1) a minimum of 75 percent of members must have incomes at or less than 90 percent of area median income, (2) a minimum of 40 percent of members must have incomes at or less than 60 percent 22 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 1 of area median income, or (3) a minimum of 20 percent of members must have incomes at or less than 50 percent of area median income. For purposes of this clause, "member income" shall mean the income of a member existing at the time the member acquires cooperative membership, 1 and median income shall mean the St. Paul- Minneapolis metropolitan area median income as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. It must also meet the following requirements: (a) The articles of incorporation set the sale price of occupancy entitling cooperative shares or memberships at no more than a transfer value determined as provided in the articles. That value may not exceed the sum of the following: (1) the consideration paid for the membership or shares by the first occupant of the unit, as shown in the records of the corporation; (2) the fair market value, as shown in the records of the corporation, of any improvements to the real property that were installed at the sole expense of the member with the prior approval of the board of directors; (3) accumulated interest, or an inflation allowance not to exceed the greater of a ten percent annual noncompounded increase on the consideration paid for the membership or share by the first occupant of the unit, or the amount that would have been paid on that consideration if interest had been paid on it at the rate of the percentage increase in the revised Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the Minneapolis -St. Paul metropolitan area prepared by the United States Department of Labor, provided that the amount determined pursuant to this clause may not exceed $500 for each year or fraction of a year the membership or share was owned; plus (4) real property capital contributions shown in the records of the corporation to have been paid by the transferor member and previous holders of the same membership, or of separate memberships that had entitled occupancy to the unit of the member involved. These contributions include contributions to a corporate reserve account the use of which is restricted to real property improvements or acquisitions, contributions to the corporation which are used for real property improvements or acquisitions, and the amount of principal amortized by the corporation on its indebtedness due to the financing of real property acquisition or improvement or the averaging of principal paid by the corporation over the term of its real property- related indebtedness. (b) The articles of incorporation require that the board of directors limit the purchase price of stock or membership interests for new member - occupants or resident shareholders to an amount which does not exceed the transfer value for the membership or stock as defined in clause (a). (c) The articles of incorporation require that the total distribution out of capital to a member shall not exceed that transfer value. (d) The articles of incorporation require that upon liquidation of the corporation any assets remaining after retirement of corporate debts and distribution to members will be conveyed to a charitable organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 23 � Anoka County City of LinoLakes 1986, as amended through December 31, 1992, or a public agency. A "limited equity cooperative apartment" is a dwelling unit owned by a limited equity cooperative. "Occupancy entitling cooperative share or membership" is the ownership interest in a cooperative organization which entitles the holder to an exclusive right to occupy a dwelling unit owned or leased by the cooperative. For purposes of taxation, the assessor shall value a unit owned by a limited equity cooperative at the lesser of its market value or the value determined by capitalizing the net operating income of a comparable apartment operated on a rental basis at the capitalization rate used in valuing comparable buildings that are not limited equity cooperatives. If a cooperative fails to operate in accordance with the provisions of clauses (a) to (d), the property shall be subject to additional property taxes in the amount of the difference between the taxes determined in accordance with this subdivision for the last ten years that the property had been assessed pursuant to this subdivision and the amount that would have been paid if the provisions of this subdivision had not applied to it. The additional taxes, plus interest at the rate specified in section 549.09, shall be extended against the property on the tax list for the current year. Subd. 9. Condominium property. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, for purposes of property taxation, condominium property shall be valued in accordance with this subdivision. (a) A structure or building that is initially constructed as condominiums shall be identified as separate units after the filing of a declaration. The market value of the residential units in that structure or building and included in the declaration shall be valued as condominiums. (b) When 60 percent or more of the residential units in a structure or building being converted to condominiums have been sold as condominiums including those units that the converters retain for their own investment, the market value of the remaining residential units in that structure or building which are included in the declaration shall be valued as condominiums. If not all of the residential units in the structure or building are included in the declaration, the 60 percent factor shall apply to those in the declaration. A separate description shall be recognized when a declaration is filed. For purposes of this clause, "retain" shall mean units that are rented and completed units that are not available for sale. (c) For purposes of this subdivision, a "sale" is defined as the date when the first written document for the purchase or conveyance of the property is signed, unless that document is revoked. Subd. 10.[Repealed, 1999 c 243 art 5 s 54] Subd. 11. Valuation of restored or preserved wetland. Wetlands restored by the federal, state, or local government, or by a nonprofit organization, or preserved under the terms of a temporary or perpetual easement by the federal or state government, must be valued by 24 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes assessors at their wetland value. 'Wetland value" in this subdivision means the market value of wetlands in any potential use in which the wetland character is not permanently altered. Wetland value shall not reflect potential uses of the wetland that would violate the terms of any existing conservation ' easement, or any one -time payment received by the wetland owner under the terms of a state or federal conservation easement. Wetland value shall reflect any potential income consistent with a property's wetland character, including but not limited to lease payments for hunting or other recreational uses. The commissioner of revenue shall issue a bulletin advising assessors of the provisions of this section by October 1, 1991. For purposes of this subdivision, "wetlands" means lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For purposes of this definition, wetlands must have the following three attributes: (1) have a predominance of hydric soils; (2) are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration ' sufficient to support a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions; and ' (3) under normal circumstances support a prevalence of such vegetation. Subd. 12. Neighborhood land trusts. (a) A neighborhood land trust, as defined under chapter 462A, is (i) a community -based nonprofit corporation organized under chapter 317A, ' which qualifies for tax exempt status under 501(c)(3), or (ii) a "city" as defined in section 462C.02, subdivision 6, which has received funding from the Minnesota housing finance agency for purposes of the neighborhood land trust program. The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency shall set the criteria for neighborhood land trusts. (b) All occupants of a neighborhood land trust building must have a family income of less than 80 percent of the greater of (1) the state median income, or (2) the area or county median income, as most recently determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Before the neighborhood land trust can rent or sell a unit to an applicant, the neighborhood land ' trust shall verify to the satisfaction of the administering agency or the city that the family income of each person or family applying for a unit in the neighborhood land trust building is within ' the income criteria provided in this paragraph. The administering agency or the city shall verify to the satisfaction of the county assessor that the occupant meets the income criteria under this 1 paragraph. The property tax benefits under paragraph (c) shall be granted only to property owned or rented by persons or families within the qualifying income limits. The family income criteria and verification is only necessary at the time of initial occupancy in the property. Anoka County City of LinoLakes (c) A unit which is owned by the occupant and used as a homestead by the occupant qualifies for homestead treatment as class 1 a under section 273.13, subdivision 22. A unit which is rented by the occupant and used as a homestead by the occupant shall be class 4a or 4b property, under section 273.13, subdivision 25, whichever is applicable. Any remaining portion of the property not used for residential purposes shall be classified by the assessor in the appropriate class based upon the use of that portion of the property owned by the neighborhood land trust. The land upon which the building is located shall be assessed at the same class rate as the units within the building, provided that if the building contains some units assessed as class 1a and some units assessed as class 4a or 4b, the market value of the land will be assessed in the same proportions as the value of the building. Subd. 13. Valuation of income - producing property. Beginning with the 1995 assessment, only accredited assessors or senior accredited assessors or other licensed assessors who have successfully completed at least two income - producing property appraisal courses may value income - producing property for ad valorem tax purposes. "Income- producing property" as used in this subdivision means the taxable property in class 3a and 3b in section 273.13, subdivision 24; class 4a and 4c, except for seasonal recreational property not used for commercial purposes; and class 5 in section 273.13, subdivision 31. "Income- producing property" includes any property in class 4e in section 273.13, subdivision 25, that would be income - producing property under the definition in this subdivision if it were not substandard. "Income- producing property appraisal course" as used in this subdivision means a course of study of approximately 30 instructional hours, with a final comprehensive test. An assessor must successfully complete the final examination for each of the two required courses. The course must be approved by the board of assessors. Subd. 14. Vacant land platted before August 1, 2001. (a) All land platted before August 1, 2001, and not improved with a permanent structure, shall be assessed as provided in this subdivision. The assessor shall determine the market value of each individual lot based upon the highest and best use of the property as unplatted land. In establishing the market value of the property, the assessor shall consider the sale price of the unplatted land or comparable sales of unplatted land of similar use and similar availability of public utilities. (b) The market value determined in paragraph (a) shall be increased as follows for each of the three assessment years immediately following the final approval of the plat: one -third of the difference between the property's unplatted market value as determined under paragraph (a) and the market value based upon the highest and best use of the land as platted property shall be 26 Anoka County City of LinoLakes added in each of the three subsequent assessment years. (c) Any increase in market value after the first assessment year following the plat's final approval shall be added to the property's market value in the next assessment year. Notwithstanding paragraph (b), if construction begins before the expiration of the three years in paragraph (b), that lot shall be eligible for revaluation in the next assessment year. The market value of a platted lot determined under this subdivision shall not exceed the value of that lot based upon the highest and best use of the property as platted land. Subd. 14a. Vacant land platted on or after August 1, 2001; located in metropolitan counties. (a) All land platted on or after August 1, 2001, located in a metropolitan county, and not improved with a permanent structure, shall be assessed as provided in this subdivision. The assessor shall determine the market value of each individual lot based upon the highest and best use of the property as unplatted land. In establishing the market value of the property, the assessor shall consider the sale price of the unplatted land or comparable sales of unplatted land of similar use and similar availability of public utilities. (b) The market value determined in paragraph (a) shall be increased as follows for each of the three assessment years immediately following the final approval of the plat: one -third of the difference between the property's unplatted market value as determined under paragraph (a) and the market value based upon the highest and best use of the land as platted property shall be added in each of the three subsequent assessment years. (c) Any increase in market value after the first assessment year following the plat's final approval shall be added to the property's market value in the next assessment year. Notwithstanding paragraph (b), if construction begins before the expiration of the three years in paragraph (b), that lot shall be eligible for revaluation in the next assessment year. The market value of a platted lot determined under this subdivision shall not exceed the value of that lot based upon the highest and best use of the property as platted land. (d) For purposes of this section, "metropolitan county" means the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington. Subd. 14b. Vacant land platted on or after August 1, 2001; located in nonmetropolitan counties. (a) All land platted on or after August 1, 2001, located in a nonmetropolitan county, and not improved with a permanent structure, shall be assessed as provided in this subdivision. The assessor shall determine the market value of each individual lot based upon the highest and best use of the property as unplatted land. In establishing the market value of the property, the assessor 27 Anoka County City of LinoLakes shall consider the sale price of the unplatted land or comparable sales of unplatted land of similar use and similar availability of public utilities. (b) The market value determined in paragraph (a) shall be increased as follows for each of the seven assessment years immediately following the final approval of the plat: one - seventh of the difference between the property's unplatted market value as determined under paragraph (a) and the market value based upon the highest and best use of the land as platted property shall be added in each of the seven subsequent assessment years. (c) Any increase in market value after the first assessment year following the plat's final approval shall be added to the property's market value in the next assessment year. Notwithstanding paragraph (b), if construction begins before the expiration of the seven years in paragraph (b), that lot shall be eligible for revaluation in the next assessment year. The market value of a platted lot determined under this subdivision shall not exceed the value of that lot based upon the highest and best use of the property as platted land. Subd. 15. Vacant hospitals. In valuing a hospital, as defined in section 144.50, subdivision 2 , that is located outside of a metropolitan county, as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 4, and that on the date of sale is vacant and not used for hospital purposes or for any other purpose, the assessor's estimated market value for taxes levied in the year of the sale shall be no greater than the sales price of the property, including both the land and the buildings, as adjusted for terms of financing. If the sale is made later than December 15, the market value as determined under this subdivision shall be used for taxes levied in the following year. This subdivision applies only if the sales price of the property was determined under an arm's - length transaction. Subd. 16. Valuation exclusion for certain improvements. Improvements to homestead property made before January 2, 2003, shall be fully or partially excluded from the value of the property for assessment purposes provided that (1) the house is at least 45 years old at the time of the improvement and (2) the assessor's estimated market value of the house on January 2 of the current year is equal to or less than $400,000. For purposes of determining this eligibility, "house" means land and buildings. The age of a residence is the number of years since the original year of its construction. In the case of a residence that is relocated, the relocation must be from a location within the state and the only improvements eligible for exclusion under this subdivision are (1) those for which building permits were issued to the homeowner after the residence was relocated to its present site, and (2) those undertaken during or after the year the residence is initially occupied by the homeowner, excluding any market value increase relating to basic improvements that are Anoka County City of LinoLakes necessary to install the residence on its foundation and connect it to utilities at its present site. In the case of an owner - occupied duplex or triplex, the improvement is eligible regardless of which portion of the property was improved. If the property lies in a jurisdiction which is subject to a building permit process, a building permit must have been issued prior to commencement of the improvement. The improvements for a single project or in any one year must add at least $5,000 to the value of the property to be eligible for exclusion under this subdivision. Only improvements to the structure which is the residence of the qualifying homesteader or construction of or improvements to no more than one two -car garage per residence qualify for the provisions of this subdivision. If an improvement was begun between January 2, 1992, and January 2, 1993, any value added from that improvement for the January 1994 and subsequent assessments shall qualify for exclusion under this subdivision provided that a building permit was obtained for the improvement between January 2, 1992, and January 2, 1993. Whenever a building permit is issued for property currently classified as homestead, the issuing jurisdiction shall notify the property owner of the possibility of valuation exclusion under this subdivision. The assessor shall require an application, including documentation of the age of the house from the owner, if unknown by the assessor. The application may be filed subsequent to the date of the building permit provided that the application must be filed within three years of the date the building permit was issued for the improvement. If the property lies in a jurisdiction which is not subject to a building permit process, the application must be filed within three years of the date the improvement was made. The assessor may require proof from the taxpayer of the date the improvement was made. Applications must be received prior to July 1 of any year in order to be effective for taxes payable in the following year. No exclusion for an improvement may be granted by a local board of review or county board of equalization, and no abatement of the taxes for qualifying improvements may be granted by the county board unless (1) a building permit was issued prior to the commencement of the improvement if the jurisdiction requires a building permit, and (2) an application was completed. The assessor shall note the qualifying value of each improvement on the property's record, and the sum of those amounts shall be subtracted from the value of the property in each year for ten years after the improvement has been made. After ten years the amount of the qualifying value shall be added back as follows: (1) 50 percent in the two subsequent assessment years if the qualifying value is equal to or less than $10,000 market value; or (2) 20 percent in the five subsequent assessment years if the qualifying value is greater than $10,000 market value. If an application is filed after the first assessment date at which an improvement could have been subject to the valuation exclusion under this subdivision, the ten -year period during which 29 Anoka County City of LinoLakes the value is subject to exclusion is reduced by the number of years that have elapsed since the property would have qualified initially. The valuation exclusion shall terminate whenever (1) the property is sold, or (2) the property is reclassified to a class which does not qualify for treatment under this subdivision. Improvements made by an occupant who is the purchaser of the property under a conditional purchase contract do not qualify under this subdivision unless the seller of the property is a governmental entity. The qualifying value of the property shall be computed based upon the increase from that structure's market value as of January 2 preceding the acquisition of the property by the governmental entity. The total qualifying value for a homestead may not exceed $50,000. The total qualifying value for a homestead with a house that is less than 70 years old may not exceed $25,000. The term "qualifying value" means the increase in estimated market value resulting from the improvement if the improvement occurs when the house is at least 70 years old, or one -half of the increase in estimated market value resulting from the improvement otherwise. The $25,000 and $50,000 maximum qualifying value under this subdivision may result from multiple improvements to the homestead. If 50 percent or more of the square footage of a structure is voluntarily razed or removed, the valuation increase attributable to any subsequent improvements to the remaining structure does not qualify for the exclusion under this subdivision. If a structure is unintentionally or accidentally destroyed by a natural disaster, the property is eligible for an exclusion under this subdivision provided that the structure was not completely destroyed. The qualifying value on property destroyed by a natural disaster shall be computed based upon the increase from that structure's market value as determined on January 2 of the year in which the disaster occurred. A property receiving benefits under the homestead disaster provisions under section 273.123 is not disqualified from receiving an exclusion under this subdivision. If any combination of improvements made to a structure after January 1, 1993, increases the size of the structure by 100 percent or more, the valuation increase attributable to the portion of the improvement that causes the structure's size to exceed 100 percent does not qualify for exclusion under this subdivision. Subd. 17. Valuation of contaminated properties. (a) In determining the market value of property containing contaminants, the assessor shall reduce the market value of the property by the contamination value of the property. The contamination value is the amount of the market value reduction that results from the presence of the contaminants, but it may not exceed the cost of a reasonable response action plan or asbestos abatement plan or management program for the property. (b) For purposes of this subdivision, "asbestos abatement plan," "contaminants," and "response action plan" have the meanings as used in sections 270.91 and 270.92. Subd. 18. Disclosure of valuation exclusion. No seller of real property shall sell or offer 30 Anoka County City of LinoLakes for sale property that, for purposes of property taxation, has an exclusion from market value for home improvements under subdivision 16, without disclosing to the buyer the existence of the excluded valuation and informing the buyer that the exclusion will end upon the sale of the property and that the property's estimated market value for property tax purposes will increase accordingly. Subd. 19. Valuation exclusion for improvements to certain business property. Property classified under Minnesota Statutes, section 273.13, subdivision 24, which is eligible for the preferred class rate on the market value up to $150,000, shall qualify for a valuation exclusion for assessment purposes, provided all of the following conditions are met: (1) the building must be at least 50 years old at the time of the improvement or damaged by the 1997 floods; (2) the building must be located in a city or town with a population of 10,000 or less that is located outside the seven - county metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2; (3) the total estimated market value of the land and buildings must be $100,000 or less prior to the improvement and prior to the damage caused by the 1997 floods; (4) the current year's estimated market value of the property must be equal to or less than the property's estimated market value in each of the two previous years' assessments; (5) a building permit must have been issued prior to the commencement of the improvement, or if the building is located in a city or town which does not have a building permit process, the property owner must notify the assessor prior to the commencement of the improvement; (6) the property, including its improvements, has received no public assistance, grants or financing except, that in the case of property damaged by the 1997 floods, the property is eligible to the extent that the flood losses are not reimbursed by insurance or any public assistance, grants, or financing; (7) the property is not receiving a property tax abatement under section 469.1813; and (8) the improvements are made after the effective date of Laws 1997, chapter 231, and prior to January 1, 1999. The assessor shall estimate the market value of the building in the assessment year immediately following the year that (1) the building permit was taken out, or (2) the taxpayer notified the assessor that an improvement was to be made. If the estimated market value of the building has increased over the prior year's assessment, the assessor shall note the amount of the increase on the property's record, and that amount shall be subtracted from the value of the property in each year for five years after the improvement has been made, at which time an amount equal to 20 percent of the excluded value shall be added back in each of the five subsequent assessment years. For any property, there can be no more than two improvements qualifying for exclusion under this subdivision. The maximum amount of value that can be excluded from any property under this subdivision is $50,000. The assessor shall require an application, including documentation of the age of the building from the owner, if unknown by the assessor. Applications must be received prior to July 1 of any year in order to be effective for taxes payable in the following year. Anoka County City of LinoLakes For purposes of this subdivision, "population" has the same meaning given in Minnesota Statutes, section 477A.011, subdivision 3. Subd. 20. Valuation exclusion for improvements to certain business property. Property classified under section 273.13, subdivision 24, qualifies for a valuation exclusion for assessment purposes, provided all of the following conditions are met: (1) the building must have been damaged by the 2002 floods; (2) the building must be located in a city or town with a population of 10,000 or less that is located in a county in the area included in DR -1419; (3) the total estimated market value of the land and buildings must be $150,000 or less for assessment year 2002; (4) a building permit must have been issued prior to the commencement of the improvement, or if the building is located in a city or town which does not have a building permit process, the property owner must notify the assessor prior to the commencement of the improvement; (5) the property is not receiving a property tax abatement under section 469.1813; and (6) the improvements are made before January 1, 2004. The assessor shall estimate the market value of the building in the assessment year immediately following the year that (1) the building permit was taken out, or (2) the taxpayer notified the assessor that an improvement was to be made. If the estimated market value of the building has increased over the 2002 assessment before any reassessment due to flood damage, the assessor shall note the amount of the increase on the property's record, and that amount shall be subtracted from the value of the property in each year for five years after the improvement has been made. In each of the next five subsequent assessment years, an amount equal to 20 percent of the value excluded in the fifth year for that improvement shall be added back. The maximum amount of value that can be excluded for all improvements to any property under this subdivision is $50,000. The assessor shall require an application. Applications must be received by December 31, 2002, or December 31, 2003, in order to be effective for taxes payable in the following year. For purposes of this subdivision, "population" has the meaning given in section 477A.011, subdivision 3 . Subd. 21. Valuation reduction for homestead property damaged by mold. (a) The owner of homestead property may apply in writing to the assessor for a reduction in the market value of the property that has been damaged by mold. The notification must include the estimated cost to cure the mold condition provided by a licensed contractor. The estimated cost must be at least $20,000. Upon completion of the work, the owner must file an application on a form prescribed by the commissioner of revenue, accompanied by a copy of the contractor's estimate. (b) If the conditions in paragraph (a) are met, the county board must grant a reduction in the market value of the homestead dwelling equal to the estimated cost to cure the mold condition. If a property owner applies for a reduction under this subdivision between January 1 and June 32 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 30 of any year, the reduction applies for taxes payable in the following year. If a property owner applies for a reduction under this subdivision between July 1 and December 31 of any year, the reduction applies for taxes payable in the second following year. (c) A denial of a reduction under this section by the county board may be appealed to the tax court. If the county board takes no action on the application within 90 days after its receipt, it is considered an approval. (d) For purposes of subdivision 1 a, in the assessment year following the assessment year when a valuation reduction has occurred under this section, any market value added by the assessor to the property resulting from curing the mold condition must be considered an increase in value due to new construction. Subd. 22. Lead hazard market value reduction. Owners of property classified as class 1 a, 1 b, 1 c, 2a, 4b, 4bb, or 4d under section 273.13 may apply for a lead hazard valuation reduction, provided that the property is located in a city which has authorized valuation reductions under this subdivision. A city that authorizes reductions under this subdivision must establish guidelines for qualifying lead hazard reduction projects and must designate an agency within the city to issue certificates of completion of qualifying projects. For purposes of this subdivision, 'lead hazard reduction" has the same meaning as in section 144.9501, subdivision 17. The property owner must obtain a certificate from the agency stating (1) that the project has been completed and (2) the total cost incurred by the owner, which must be at least $3,000. Only projects originating after July 1, 2005, and completed before July 1, 2010, qualify for a reduction under this subdivision. The property owner shall apply for the valuation reduction to the assessor on a form prescribed by the assessor accompanied by a copy of the certificate of completion from the agency. A qualifying property is eligible for a one -year valuation reduction equal to the actual cost incurred, to a maximum of $20,000. If a property owner applies to the assessor for the valuation reduction under this subdivision between January 1 and June 30 of any year, the reduction applies for taxes payable in the following year. If a property owner applies to the assessor for the valuation reduction under this subdivision between July 1 and December 31, the reduction applies for taxes payable in the second following year. For purposes of subdivision 1 a, any additional market value resulting from the lead hazard removal must be considered an increase in value due to new construction. Subd. 23. First tier valuation limit; agricultural homestead property. (a) Beginning with assessment year 2006, the commissioner of revenue shall annually certify the first tier limit for agricultural homestead property as the product of (i) $600,000, and (ii) the ratio of the statewide average taxable market value of agricultural property per acre of deeded farm land in the preceding assessment year to the statewide average taxable market value of agricultural property per acre of deeded farm land for assessment year 2004. The limit shall be rounded to the nearest 33 Anoka County City of LinoLakes $10,000. (b) For the purposes of this subdivision, "agricultural property" means all class 2 property under section 273.13, subdivision 23, except for (1) timberland, (2) a landing area or public access area of a privately owned public use airport, and (3) property consisting of the house, garage, and immediately surrounding one acre of land of an agricultural homestead. (c) The commissioner shall certify the limit by January 2 of each assessment year, except that for assessment year 2006 the commissioner shall certify the limit by June 1, 2006. History: (1992) RL s 810; Ex1967 c 32 art 7 s 3; 1969 c 574 s 1; 1969 c 990 s 1; 1971 c 427 s 1; 1971 c 489 s 1; 1971 c 831 s 1; 1973 c 582 s 3; 1973 c 650 art 23 s 1 -4; 1974 c 556 s 14; 1975 c 437 art 8 s 4 -6; 1976 c 2 s 93; 1976 c 345 s 1; 1977 c 423 art 4 s 4; 1978 c 786 s 10,11, 1979 c 303 art 2 s 7; 1Sp1981 c 1 art 2 s 3,4; 1Sp1981 c 4 art 2 s 50; 1982 c 424 s 61,62; 1982 c 523 art 19 s 2; art 21 s 1; 1983 c 222 s 7; 1983 c 342 art 2 s 5-7; 1984 c 502 art 3 s 6; 1 Sp 1985 c 14 art 4 s 35; 1986 c 444; 1 Sp 1986 c 1 art 4 s 12; 1987 c 268 art 5 s 1; art 7 s 32; 1987 c 384 art 3 s 10; 1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; 1989 c 329 art 13 s 20; 1989 c 356 s 13; 1990 c 480 art 7 s 5; 1990 c 604 art 3 s 9; 1991 c 291 art 1 s 12; 1991 c 354 art 10 s 7,8; 1992 c 511 art 2 s 11,12; 1992 c 556s2,3; 1992c597s14; 1993 c 375 art 5 s 8-13; art 8 s 14; art 11 s3; art 12s9; 1994c 416 art 1 s 13; 1994 c 587 art 5 s 3 -5; 1995 c 1 s 2; 1995 c 264 art 16 s 9; 1996 c 471 art 3 s 5; 1997c 231 art 2s 10,11,52; art 8s2; 1997c251 s 16; 1998c397art 11 s3; 1999c243art 5s6,7; 1 Sp2001 c 5 art 3 s 23 -26; 1 Sp2002 c 1 s 14; 2003 c 127 art 5 s 15; 1 Sp2003 c 21 art 4 s 3; 2005 c 151 art 2 s 6; art 5 s 16; 1Sp2005 c 3 art 1 s 8-10; 2006 c 259 art 4 s 11 34 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Anoka County City of LinoLakes 273.121 VALUATION OF REAL PROPERTY, NOTICE. Any county assessor or city assessor having the powers of a county assessor, valuing or classifying taxable real property shall in each year notify those persons whose property is to be included on the assessment roll that year if the person's address is known to the assessor, otherwise the occupant of the property. The notice shall be in writing and shall be sent by ordinary mail at least ten days before the meeting of the local board of appeal and equalization under section 274.01 or the review process established under section 274.13, subdivision 1 c. It shall contain: (1) the market value for the current and prior assessment, (2) the limited market value under section 273.11, subdivision 1 a, for the current and prior assessment, (3) the qualifying amount of any improvements under section 273.11, subdivision 16, for the current assessment, (4) the market value subject to taxation after subtracting the amount of any qualifying improvements for the current assessment, (5) the classification of the property for the current and prior assessment, (6) a note that if the property is homestead and at least 45 years old, improvements made to the property may be eligible for a valuation exclusion under section 273.11, subdivision 16, (7) the assessor's office address, and (8) the dates, places, and times set for the meetings of the local board of appeal and equalization, the review process established under section 274.13, subdivision 1 c and the county board of appeal and equalization. The commissioner of revenue shall specify the form of the notice. The assessor shall attach to the assessment roll a statement that the notices required by this section have been mailed. Any assessor who is not provided sufficient funds from the assessor's governing body to provide such notices, may make application to the commissioner of revenue to finance such notices. The commissioner of revenue shall conduct an investigation and, if satisfied that the assessor does not have the necessary funds, issue a certification to the commissioner of finance of the amount necessary to provide such notices. The commissioner of finance shall issue a warrant for such amount and shall deduct such amount from any state payment to such county or municipality. The necessary funds to make such payments are hereby appropriated. Failure to receive the notice shall in no way affect the validity of the assessment, the resulting tax, the procedures of any board of review or equalization, or the enforcement of delinquent taxes by statutory means. History: Ex1971 c 31 art 23 s 2; 1973 c 492 s 14; 1974 c 363 s 1; 1975 c 437 art 8 s 7; 1980 c 437 s 3; 1982 c 523 art 23 s 1; 1 Sp 1985 c 14 art 4 s 41; 1986 c 444; 1988 c 719 art 6 s 8; 1993 c375 art 5s16; 1995c1s3; 1997c231 art 2s17;; 1Sp2001c5 art 7s20 ;2002c377 art 10s5 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Anoka County City of LinoLakes 273.13 CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY. Subdivision 1. How classified. Al real and personal property subject to a general property tax and not subject to any gross earnings or other in -lieu tax is hereby classified for purposes of taxation as provided by this section. Subd. 2.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 2a.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 3.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 4.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 5.[Repealed, Ex1971 c 31 art 22 s 5] Subd. 5a.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 6.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 6a.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 7.[Repealed, 1 Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 7a.[Repealed, 1988 c 719 art 5 s 81] Subd. 7b.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 7c.[Repealed, 1 Spl985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 7d.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 8.[Repealed, Ex1967 c 32 art 4 s 3] Subd. 8a.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 9.[Repealed, 1988 c 719 art 5 s 81] Subd. 10.[Repealed, 1Spl 985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 11.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 12.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 13.[Repealed, 1974 c 313 s 1] Subd. 14.[Repealed, 1984 c 593 s 46] Subd. 14a.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 15.[Repealed, Ex1971 c 31 art 36 s 2] Subd. 15a.[Repealed, 1988 c 719 art 5 s 81] Subd. 15b.[Repealed, 1983 c 342 art 2 s 30] Subd. 16.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 17.[Repealed, 1 Spl 985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 17a.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 17b.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 17c.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 17d.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 18.[Repealed, 1983 c 222 s 45] Subd. 19.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 20.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 21.[Repealed, 1Sp1985 c 14 art 4 s 98] Subd. 21 a. Class rate. In this section, wherever the "class rate" of a class of property is specified without qualification as to whether it is the property's "net class rate" or its "gross class rate," the "net class rate" and "gross class rate" of that property are the same as its "class rate." Subd. 21 b. Tax capacity. (a) Gross tax capacity means the product of the appropriate gross class rates in this section and market values. (b) Net tax capacity means the product of the appropriate net class rates in this section and market values. Subd. 22. Class 1. (a) Except as provided in subdivision 23 and in paragraphs (b) and (c), real estate which is residential and used for homestead purposes is class 1 a. In the case of a duplex or triplex in which one of the units is used for homestead purposes, the entire property is deemed to be used for homestead purposes. The market value of class 1 a property must be determined based upon the value of the house, garage, and land. The first $500,000 of market value of class 1 a property has a net class rate of one percent of its market value; and the market value of class 1 a property that exceeds $500,000 has a class rate of 1.25 percent of its market value. (b) Class 1 b property includes homestead real estate or homestead manufactured homes used 38 Anoka County City of LinoLakes for the purposes of a homestead by (1) any person who is blind as defined in section 256D.35, or the blind person and the blind person's spouse; or (2) any person, hereinafter referred to as "veteran," who: (i) served in the active military or naval service of the United States; and (ii) is entitled to compensation under the laws and regulations of the United States for permanent and total service- connected disability due to the Toss, or loss of use, by reason of amputation, ankylosis, progressive muscular dystrophies, or paralysis, of both lower extremities, such as to preclude motion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair; and (iii) has acquired a special housing unit with special fixtures or movable facilities made necessary by the nature of the veteran's disability, or the surviving spouse of the deceased veteran for as long as the surviving spouse retains the special housing unit as a homestead; or (3) any person who is permanently and totally disabled. Property is classified and assessed under clause (3) only if the government agency or income- providing source certifies, upon the request of the homestead occupant, that the homestead occupant satisfies the disability requirements of this paragraph. Property is classified and assessed pursuant to clause (1) only if the commissioner of revenue certifies to the assessor that the homestead occupant satisfies the requirements of this paragraph. Permanently and totally disabled for the purpose of this subdivision means a condition which is permanent in nature and totally incapacitates the person from working at an occupation which brings the person an income. The first $32,000 market value of class 1 b property has a net class rate of .45 percent of its market value. The remaining market value of class 1 b property has a class rate using the rates for class 1 a or class 2a property, whichever is appropriate, of similar market value. (c) Class 1 c property is commercial use real property that abuts a Lakeshore line and is devoted to temporary and seasonal residential occupancy for recreational purposes but not devoted to commercial purposes for more than 250 days in the year preceding the year of assessment, and that includes a portion used as a homestead by the owner, which includes a dwelling occupied as a homestead by a shareholder of a corporation that owns the resort, a partner in a partnership that owns the resort, or a member of a limited liability company that owns the resort even if the title to the homestead is held by the corporation, partnership, or limited liability company. For purposes of this clause, property is devoted to a commercial purpose on a specific day if any portion of the property, excluding the portion used exclusively as a homestead, is used for residential occupancy and a fee is charged for residential occupancy. The portion of the property used as a homestead is class 1 a property under paragraph (a). The remainder of the property is classified as follows: the first $500,000 of market value is tier I, the next $1,700,000 of market value is tier II, and any remaining market value is tier III. The class rates for class 1 c are: tier I, 0.55 percent; tier II, 1.0 percent; and tier III, 1.25 percent. If a class 1 c resort property has any market value in tier III, the entire property must meet the requirements of subdivision 25, paragraph (d), clause (1), to qualify for class 1 c treatment under this paragraph. (d) Class 1 d property includes structures that meet all of the following criteria: (1) the structure is located on property that is classified as agricultural property under section 273.13, subdivision 23; (2) the structure is occupied exclusively by seasonal farm workers during the time when they work on that farm, and the occupants are not charged rent for the privilege of occupying the property, provided that use of the structure for storage of farm equipment and produce does not disqualify the property from classification under this paragraph; (3) the structure meets all applicable health and safety requirements for the appropriate season; and (4) the structure is not salable as residential property because it does not comply with local ordinances relating to location in relation to streets or roads. The market value of class 1 d property has the same class rates as class 1 a property under paragraph (a). Subd. 23. Class 2. (a) Class 2a property is agricultural land including any improvements that is homesteaded. The market value of the house and garage and immediately surrounding 39 Anoka County City of LinoLakes one acre of land has the same class rates as class 1 a property under subdivision 22. The value of the remaining land including improvements up to the first tier valuation limit of agricultural homestead property has a net class rate of 0.55 percent of market value. The remaining property over the first tier has a class rate of one percent of market value. For purposes of this subdivision, the "first tier valuation limit of agricultural homestead property" and "first tier" means the limit certified under section 273.11, subdivision 23. (b) Class 2b property is (1) real estate, rural in character and used exclusively for growing trees for timber, lumber, and wood and wood products; (2) real estate that is not improved with a structure and is used exclusively for growing trees for timber, lumber, and wood and wood products, if the owner has participated or is participating in a cost - sharing program for afforestation, reforestation, or timber stand improvement on that particular property, administered or coordinated by the commissioner of natural resources; (3) real estate that is nonhomestead agricultural land; or (4) a landing area or public access area of a privately owned public use airport. Class 2b property has a net class rate of one percent of market value. (c) Agricultural land as used in this section means contiguous acreage of ten acres or more, used during the preceding year for agricultural purposes. "Agricultural purposes" as used in this section means the raising or cultivation of agricultural products. "Agricultural purposes" also includes enrollment in the Reinvest in Minnesota program under sections 103F.501 to 103F.535 or the federal Conservation Reserve Program as contained in Public Law 99 -198 if the property was classified as agricultural (i) under this subdivision for the assessment year 2002 or (ii) in the year prior to its enrollment. Contiguous acreage on the same parcel, or contiguous acreage on an immediately adjacent parcel under the same ownership, may also qualify as agricultural land, but only if it is pasture, timber, waste, unusable wild land, or land included in state or federal farm programs. Agricultural classification for property shall be determined excluding the house, garage, and immediately surrounding one acre of land, and shall not be based upon the market value of any residential structures on the parcel or contiguous parcels under the same ownership. (d) Real estate, excluding the house, garage, and immediately surrounding one acre of land, of less than ten acres which is exclusively and intensively used for raising or cultivating agricultural products, shall be considered as agricultural land. Land shall be classified as agricultural even if all or a portion of the agricultural use of that property is the leasing to, or use by another person for agricultural purposes. Classification under this subdivision is not determinative for qualifying under section 273.111. The property classification under this section supersedes, for property tax purposes only, any locally administered agricultural policies or land use restrictions that define minimum or maximum farm acreage. (e) The term "agricultural products" as used in this subdivision includes production for sale of: (1) livestock, dairy animals, dairy products, poultry and poultry products, fur - bearing animals, horticultural and nursery stock, fruit of all kinds, vegetables, forage, grains, bees, and apiary products by the owner; (2) fish bred for sale and consumption if the fish breeding occurs on land zoned for agricultural use; (3) the commercial boarding of horses if the boarding is done in conjunction with raising or cultivating agricultural products as defined in clause (1); (4) property which is owned and operated by nonprofit organizations used for equestrian activities, excluding racing; (5) game birds and waterfowl bred and raised for use on a shooting preserve licensed under section 97A.115; (6) insects primarily bred to be used as food for animals; (7) trees, grown for sale as a crop, and not sold for timber, lumber, wood, or wood products; and (8) maple syrup taken from trees grown by a person licensed by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture under chapter 28A as a food processor. (f) If a parcel used for agricultural purposes is also used for commercial or industrial 40 Anoka County City of LinoLakes purposes, including but not limited to: (1) wholesale and retail sales; (2) processing of raw agricultural products or other goods; (3) warehousing or storage of processed goods; and (4) office facilities for the support of the activities enumerated in clauses (1), (2), and (3), the assessor shall classify the part of the parcel used for agricultural purposes as class 1 b, 2a, or 2b, whichever is appropriate, and the remainder in the class appropriate to its use. The grading, sorting, and packaging of raw agricultural products for first sale is considered an agricultural purpose. A greenhouse or other building where horticultural or nursery products are grown that is also used for the conduct of retail sales must be classified as agricultural if it is primarily used for the growing of horticultural or nursery products from seed, cuttings, or roots and occasionally as a showroom for the retail sale of those products. Use of a greenhouse or building only for the display of already grown horticultural or nursery products does not qualify as an agricultural purpose. The assessor shall determine and list separately on the records the market value of the homestead dwelling and the one acre of land on which that dwelling is located. If any farm buildings or structures are located on this homesteaded acre of land, their market value shall not be included in this separate determination. (g) To qualify for classification under paragraph (b), clause (4), a privately owned public use airport must be licensed as a public airport under section 360.018. For purposes of paragraph (b), clause (4), "landing area" means that part of a privately owned public use airport properly cleared, regularly maintained, and made available to the public for use by aircraft and includes runways, taxiways, aprons, and sites upon which are situated landing or navigational aids. A landing area also includes land underlying both the primary surface and the approach surfaces that comply with all of the following: (i) the land is properly cleared and regularly maintained for the primary purposes of the landing, taking off, and taxiing of aircraft; but that portion of the land that contains facilities for servicing, repair, or maintenance of aircraft is not included as a landing area; (ii) the land is part of the airport property; and (iii) the land is not used for commercial or residential purposes. The land contained in a landing area under paragraph (b), clause (4), must be described and certified by the commissioner of transportation. The certification is effective until it is modified, or until the airport or landing area no longer meets the requirements of paragraph (b), clause (4). For purposes of paragraph (b), clause (4), "public access area" means property used as an aircraft parking ramp, apron, or storage hangar, or an arrival and departure building in connection with the airport. Subd. 24. Class 3. (a) Commercial and industrial property and utility real and personal property is class 3a. (1) Except as otherwise provided, each parcel of commercial, industrial, or utility real property has a class rate of 1.5 percent of the first tier of market value, and 2.0 percent of the remaining market value. In the case of contiguous parcels of property owned by the same person or entity, only the value equal to the first -tier value of the contiguous parcels qualifies for the reduced class rate, except that contiguous parcels owned by the same person or entity shall be eligible for the first -tier value class rate on each separate business operated by the owner of the property, provided the business is housed in a separate structure. For the purposes of this subdivision, the first tier means the first $150,000 of market value. Real property owned in fee by a utility for transmission line right -of -way shall be classified at the class rate for the higher tier. For purposes of this subdivision, parcels are considered to be contiguous even if they are separated from each other by a road, street, waterway, or other similar intervening type of property. Connections between parcels that consist of power lines or pipelines do not cause the parcels to be contiguous. Property owners who have contiguous parcels of property that constitute separate businesses that may qualify for the first -tier class rate shall notify the assessor by July 1, for treatment beginning in the following taxes payable year. (2) All personal property that is: (i) part of an electric generation, transmission, or distribution system; or (ii) part of a pipeline system transporting or distributing water, gas, crude oil, or petroleum products; and (iii) not described in clause (3), and all railroad operating property 41 Anoka County City of LinoLakes has a class rate as provided under clause (1) for the first tier of market value and the remaining market value. In the case of multiple parcels in one county that are owned by one person or entity, only one first tier amount is eligible for the reduced rate. (3) The entire market value of personal property that is: (i) tools, implements, and machinery of an electric generation, transmission, or distribution system; (ii) tools, implements, and machinery of a pipeline system transporting or distributing water, gas, crude oil, or petroleum products; or (iii) the mains and pipes used in the distribution of steam or hot or chilled water for heating or cooling buildings, has a class rate as provided under clause (1) for the remaining market value in excess of the first tier. (b) Employment property defined in section 469.166, during the period provided in section 469.170, shall constitute class 3b. The class rates for class 3b property are determined under paragraph (a). Subd. 24a.[Repealed, 1 Sp2001 c 5 art 3 s 96] Subd. 25. Class 4. (a) Class 4a is residential real estate containing four or more units and used or held for use by the owner or by the tenants or lessees of the owner as a residence for rental periods of 30 days or more, excluding property qualifying for class 4d. Class 4a also includes hospitals licensed under sections 144.50 to 144.56, other than hospitals exempt under section 272.02, and contiguous property used for hospital purposes, without regard to whether the property has been platted or subdivided. The market value of class 4a property has a class rate of 1.25 percent. (b) Class 4b includes: (1) residential real estate containing less than four units that does not qualify as class 4bb, other than seasonal residential recreational property; (2) manufactured homes not classified under any other provision; (3) a dwelling, garage, and surrounding one acre of property on a nonhomestead farm classified under subdivision 23, paragraph (b) containing two or three units; and (4) unimproved property that is classified residential as determined under subdivision 33. The market value of class 4b property has a class rate of 1.25 percent. (c) Class 4bb includes: (1) nonhomestead residential real estate containing one unit, other than seasonal residential recreational property; and (2) a single family dwelling, garage, and surrounding one acre of property on a nonhomestead farm classified under subdivision 23, paragraph (b). Class 4bb property has the same class rates as class 1 a property under subdivision 22. Property that has been classified as seasonal residential recreational property at any time during which it has been owned by the current owner or spouse of the current owner does not qualify for class 4bb. (d) Class 4c property includes: (1) except as provided in subdivision 22, paragraph (c), real property devoted to temporary and seasonal residential occupancy for recreation purposes, including real property devoted to temporary and seasonal residential occupancy for recreation purposes and not devoted to commercial purposes for more than 250 days in the year preceding the year of assessment. For purposes of this clause, property is devoted to a commercial purpose on a specific day if any portion of the property is used for residential occupancy, and a fee is charged for residential occupancy. In order for a property to be classified as class 4c, seasonal residential recreational for commercial purposes, at least 40 percent of the annual gross lodging receipts related to the property must be from business conducted during 90 consecutive days and either (i) at least 60 percent of all paid bookings by lodging guests during the year must be for periods of at least two consecutive nights; or (ii) at least 20 percent of the annual gross receipts must be from charges for rental of fish houses, boats and motors, snowmobiles, downhill or cross - country ski equipment, or charges for marina services, launch services, and guide services, or the sale of bait and fishing tackle. For purposes of this determination, a paid booking of five or more nights shall be counted as two bookings. Class 4c also includes commercial use real property used exclusively for recreational purposes in conjunction with class 4c property devoted to temporary and seasonal residential occupancy for recreational purposes, up to a total of two acres, provided the property 42 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes ' is not devoted to commercial recreational use for more than 250 days in the year preceding the year of assessment and is located within two miles of the class 4c property with which it is used. Owners of real property devoted to temporary and seasonal residential occupancy for recreation purposes and all or a portion of which was devoted to commercial purposes for not more than ' 250 days in the year preceding the year of assessment desiring classification as class 1 c or 4c, must submit a declaration to the assessor designating the cabins or units occupied for 250 days or less in the year preceding the year of assessment by January 15 of the assessment year. Those e cabins or units and a proportionate share of the land on which they are located will be designated class 1 c or 4c as otherwise provided. The remainder of the cabins or units and a proportionate share of the land on which they are located will be designated as class 3a. The owner of property ' desiring designation as class 1 c or 4c property must provide guest registers or other records demonstrating that the units for which class 1 c or 4c designation is sought were not occupied for more than 250 days in the year preceding the assessment if so requested. The portion of a property operated as a (1) restaurant, (2) bar, (3) gift shop, and (4) other nonresidential facility operated ' on a commercial basis not directly related to temporary and seasonal residential occupancy for recreation purposes shall not qualify for class 1 c or 4c; (2) qualified property used as a golf course if: ' (i) it is open to the public on a daily fee basis. It may charge membership fees or dues, but a membership fee may not be required in order to use the property for golfing, and its green fees for golfing must be comparable to green fees typically charged by municipal courses; and (ii) it meets the requirements of section 273.112, subdivision 3, paragraph (d). A structure used as a clubhouse, restaurant, or place of refreshment in conjunction with the golf course is classified as class 3a property; (3) real property up to a maximum of one acre of land owned by a nonprofit community ' service oriented organization; provided that the property is not used for a revenue - producing activity for more than six days in the calendar year preceding the year of assessment and the property is not used for residential purposes on either a temporary or permanent basis. For ' purposes of this clause, a "nonprofit community service oriented organization" means any corporation, society, association, foundation, or institution organized and operated exclusively for charitable, religious, fraternal, civic, or educational purposes, and which is exempt from federal income taxation pursuant to section 501(c)(3), (10), or (19) of the Internal Revenue Code of e 1986, as amended through December 31, 1990. For purposes of this clause, "revenue- producing activities" shall include but not be limited to property or that portion of the property that is used as an on -sale intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor establishment licensed under chapter 340A, a restaurant open to the public, bowling alley, a retail store, gambling conducted by organizations licensed under chapter 349, an insurance business, or office or other space leased or rented to a lessee who conducts a for - profit enterprise on the premises. Any portion of the property which is used for revenue - producing activities for more than six days in the calendar year preceding the year of assessment shall be assessed as class 3a. The use of the property for social events open exclusively to members and their guests for periods of less than 24 hours, when an admission is not charged nor any revenues are received by the organization shall not ' be considered a revenue - producing activity; (4) postsecondary student housing of not more than one acre of land that is owned by a nonprofit corporation organized under chapter 317A and is used exclusively by a student ' cooperative, sorority, or fraternity for on- campus housing or housing located within two miles of the border of a college campus; (5) manufactured home parks as defined in section 327.14, subdivision 3; ' (6) real property that is actively and exclusively devoted to indoor fitness, health, social, recreational, and related uses, is owned and operated by a not - for - profit corporation, and is located within the metropolitan area as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 2; (7) a leased or privately owned noncommercial aircraft storage hangar not exempt under ' section 272.01, subdivision 2, and the land on which it is located, provided that: (i) the land is on an airport owned or operated by a city, town, county, Metropolitan Airports Commission, or group thereof; and (ii) the land lease, or any ordinance or signed agreement restricting the use of the leased Anoka County City of LinoLakes premise, prohibits commercial activity performed at the hangar. If a hangar classified under this clause is sold after June 30, 2000, a bill of sale must be filed by the new owner with the assessor of the county where the property is located within 60 days of the sale; (8) a privately owned noncommercial aircraft storage hangar not exempt under section 272.01, subdivision 2, and the land on which it is located, provided that: (i) the land abuts a public airport; and (ii) the owner of the aircraft storage hangar provides the assessor with a signed agreement restricting the use of the premises, prohibiting commercial use or activity performed at the hangar; and (9) residential real estate, a portion of which is used by the owner for homestead purposes, and that is also a place of lodging, if all of the following criteria are met: (i) rooms are provided for rent to transient guests that generally stay for periods of 14 or fewer days; (ii) meals are provided to persons who rent rooms, the cost of which is incorporated in the basic room rate; (iii) meals are not provided to the general public except for special events on fewer than seven days in the calendar year preceding the year of the assessment; and (iv) the owner is the operator of the property. The market value subject to the 4c classification under this clause is limited to five rental units. Any rental units on the property in excess of five, must be valued and assessed as class 3a. The portion of the property used for purposes of a homestead by the owner must be classified as class 1 a property under subdivision 22. Class 4c property has a class rate of 1.5 percent of market value, except that (i) each parcel of seasonal residential recreational property not used for commercial purposes has the same class rates as class 4bb property, (ii) manufactured home parks assessed under clause (5) have the same class rate as class 4b property, (iii) commercial -use seasonal residential recreational property has a class rate of one percent for the first $500,000 of market value, and 1.25 percent for the remaining market value, (iv) the market value of property described in clause (4) has a class rate of one percent, (v) the market value of property described in clauses (2) and (6) has a class rate of 1.25 percent, and (vi) that portion of the market value of property in clause (9) qualifying for class 4c property has a class rate of 1.25 percent. (e) Class 4d property is qualifying low- income rental housing certified to the assessor by the Housing Finance Agency under section 273.128, subdivision 3. If only a portion of the units in the building qualify as low- income rental housing units as certified under section 273.128, subdivision 3 , only the proportion of qualifying units to the total number of units in the building qualify for class 4d. The remaining portion of the building shall be classified by the assessor based upon its use. Class 4d also includes the same proportion of land as the qualifying low- income rental housing units are to the total units in the building. For all properties qualifying as class 4d, the market value determined by the assessor must be based on the normal approach to value using normal unrestricted rents. Class 4d property has a class rate of 0.75 percent. Subd. 25a. Elderly assisted living facility property. "Elderly assisted living facility property" means residential real estate containing more than one unit held for use by the tenants or lessees as a residence for periods of 30 days or more, along with community rooms, lounges, activity rooms, and related facilities, designed to meet the housing, health, and financial security needs of the elderly. The real estate may be owned by an individual, partnership, limited partnership, for - profit corporation or nonprofit corporation exempt from federal income taxation under United States Code, title 26, section 501(c)(3) or related sections. An admission or initiation fee may be required of tenants. Monthly charges may include charges for the residential unit, meals, housekeeping, utilities, social programs, a health care alert system, or any combination of them. On -site health care may be provided by in -house staff or an outside health care provider. The assessor shall classify elderly assisted living facility property, depending upon the property's ownership, occupancy, and use. The applicable class rates shall apply based on its 44 Anoka County City of LinoLakes classification, if taxable. Subd. 26.[Repealed, 1987 c 268 art 6 s 53] Subd. 27.[Repealed, 1987 c 268 art 6 s 53] Subd. 28.[Repealed, 1987 c 268 art 6 s 53] Subd. 29.[Repealed, 1987 c 268 art 6 s 53] Subd. 30.[Repealed, 1988 c 719 art 5 s 81] Subd. 31. Class 5. Class 5 property includes: (1) unmined iron ore and low -grade iron - bearing formations as defined in section 273.14; and (2) all other property not otherwise classified. Class 5 property has a class rate of 2.0 percent of market value. Subd. 32.[Repealed, 1998 c 389 art 2 s 21] Subd. 33. Classification of unimproved property. (a) All real property that is not improved with a structure must be classified according to its current use. (b) Real property that is not improved with a structure and for which there is no identifiable current use must be classified according to its highest and best use permitted under the local zoning ordinance. If the ordinance permits more than one use, the land must be classified according to the highest and best use permitted under the ordinance. If no such ordinance exists, the assessor shall consider the most likely potential use of the unimproved land based upon the use made of surrounding land or land in proximity to the unimproved land. History: (1993) 1913 c 483 s 1; 1923 c 140; 1933 c 132; 1933 c 359; 1937 c 365 s 1; Ex1937 c 86 s 1; 1939 c 48; 1941 c 436; 1941 c 437 ;; 1941 c 438; 1943 c 172 s 1; 1943 c 648 s 1; 1945 c 274 s 1; 1945 c 527 s 1; 1947 c 537 s 1; 1949 c 723 s 1; 1951 c 510 s 1; 1951 c 585 s 1; 1953 c 358 s 1,2; 1953 c 400 s 1; 1953 c 747 s 1,2; 1955 c 751 s 1,2; 1957 c 866 s 1; 1957 c 959 s 1; 1959 c 40 s 1; 1959 c 338 s 1; 1959 c 541 s 1; 1959 c 562 s 3; Ex1959 c 70 art 1 s 2; 1961 c 243 s 1; 1961 c 322 s 1; 1961 c 340 s 3; 1961 c 475 s 1; 1961 c 710 s 1; 1963 c 426 s 1; 1965 c 259 s 1; 1967 c 606 s 1; Ex1967 c 32 art 1 s 2 -4; art 4 s 1; art 9 s 1,2; 1969 c 251 s 1; 1969 c 399 s 49; 1969 c 407 s 1; 1969 c 417 s 1; 1969 c 422 s 1,2; 1969 c 709 s 4,5; 1969 c 760 s 1; 1969 c 763 s 1; 1969 c 965 s 2; 1969 c 1126 s 2; 1969 c 1128 s 1,2; 1969 c 1132 s 1; 1969 c 1137 s 1; 1971 c 226 s 1; 1971 c 427 s 3- 12,16,17; 1971 c 747 s 1; 1971 c 791 s 1; 1971 c 797 s 3,4; Ex1971 c 31 art 9 s 1; art 22 s 1,2,4,6,7,8; Ex1971 c 31 art 36 s 1; 1973 c 355 s 1,2; 1973 c 456 s 1; 1973 c 492 s 14; 1973 c 582 s 3; 1973 c 590 s 1; 1973 c 650 art 14 s 1,2; art 20 s 3; art 24 s 3; 1973 c 774 s 1; 1974 c 545 s 3; 1974 c 556 s 16; 1975 c 46 s 3; 1975 c 339 s 9; 1975 c 359 s 23; 1975c376s 1; 1975c395s 1; 1975c437art 1s25,27,28; 1976c2s96,159- 161,170; 1976c 181 s 2; 1976 c 245 s 1; 1977 c 319 s 1,2; 1977 c 347 s 43,44; 1977 c 423 art 3 s 5 -8; 1978 c 767 s7 -11; 1979c303 art 2s11- 17 ;; art 10s5; 1979 c 334 art 1 s 25; 1980c437s5; 1980c562s1; 1980 c 607 art 2 s 7 -15; art 4 s 4; 1981 c 188 s 1; 1981 c 356 s 248; 1981 c 365 s 9; 1 Sp 1981 c 1 art 2 s 7 -11; art 5 s 2; 1 Sp 1981 c 3 s 1; 1 Sp 1981 c 4 art 2 s 27 ;; 2Sp 1981 c 1 s 6; 3Sp 1981 c 1 art 1 s 2; 1982 c 523 art 6 s 1; art 14 s 1; art 23 s 2; 1982 c 642 s 9; 1983 c 216 art 1 s 43,44; 1983 c 222 s 11 -13; 1983 c 342 art 2 s 9 -18; art 8 s 1; 1984 c 502 art 3 s 9 -14; art 7 s 1,2; 1984 c 522 s 2; 1984 c 593 s 22 -28; 1984 c 654 art 5 s 58; 1985 c 248 s 70; 1985 c 300 s 6; 1 Sp 1985 c 14 art 3 s 5 -12; art 4 s 45 -56; 1986 c 444; 1 Sp 1986 c 1 art 4 s 18 -21; 1987 c 268 art 5 s 4; art 6 s 18,20 -23; 1987 c 291 s 208 -209; 1987 c 384 art 1 s 25; 1988 c 719 art 5 s 13 -19; 1989 c 277 art 2 s 28,29; 1989 c 304 s 137; 1 Sp 1989 c 1 art 2 s 1 -8,11; 1990 c 480 art 7 s 7; 1990 c 604 art 3 s 16 -19; 1991 c 249 s 31; 1991 c 291 art 1 s 20 -25; 1992 c 363 art 1 s 12; 1992 c 511 art 2 s 17,18; art 4 s 4,5; 1993 c 224 art 1 s 27; 1993 c 375 art 3 s 16; art 5 s 23 -26; 1994 c 416 art 1 s 18,19; 1994 c 483 s 1; 1994 c 587 art 5 s 10,11; 1995 c 264 art 3 s 9,10; 1996 c 471 art 3 s 10 -12; 1997 c 231 art 1 s 6 -10; art 2 s 20,21; 3Sp1997 c 3 s 28; 1998 c 254 art 1 s 74; 1998 c 389 art 2 s 8 -12; 1999 c 243 art 5 s 15 -20; 1999 c 248 s 18; 1999 c 249 s 22; 2000 c 490 art 5 s 12,13; 1 Sp2001 c 5 art 3 s 32 -36; 2002 c 377 art 4 s 16,17; art 10 s 6; 2003 c 127 art 2 s 13,14; art 5 s 17; 2003 c 128 art 3 s 45; 1 Sp2003 c 21 art 4 s 4; 2005 c 151 art 3 s 12; 1Sp2005c3art 1 s 15,16; 2006c259art 4s 13; art5s 1,2 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 274.01 BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION. Subdivision 1. Ordinary board; meetings, deadlines, grievances. (a) The town board of a town, or the council or other governing body of a city, is the board of appeal and equalization except (1) in cities whose charters provide for a board of equalization or (2) in any city or town that has transferred its local board of review power and duties to the county board as provided in subdivision 3. The county assessor shall fix a day and time when the board or the board of equalization shall meet in the assessment districts of the county. Notwithstanding any law or city charter to the contrary, a city board of equalization shall be referred to as a board of appeal and equalization. On or before February 15 of each year the assessor shall give written notice of the time to the city or town clerk. Notwithstanding the provisions of any charter to the contrary, the meetings must be held between April 1 and May 31 each year. The clerk shall give published and posted notice of the meeting at least ten days before the date of the meeting. The board shall meet at the office of the clerk to review the assessment and classification of property in the town or city. No changes in valuation or classification which are intended to correct errors in judgment by the county assessor may be made by the county assessor after the board has adjourned in those cities or towns that hold a local board of review; however, corrections of errors that are merely clerical in nature or changes that extend homestead treatment to property are permitted after adjournment until the tax extension date for that assessment year. The changes must be fully documented and maintained in the assessors office and must be available for review by any person. A copy of the changes made during this period in those cities or towns that hold a local board of review must be sent to the county board no later than December 31 of the assessment year. (b) The board shall determine whether the taxable property in the town or city has been properly placed on the list and properly valued by the assessor. If real or personal property has been omitted, the board shall place it on the list with its market value, and correct the assessment so that each tract or lot of real property, and each article, parcel, or class of personal property, is entered on the assessment list at its market value. No assessment of the property of any person may be raised unless the person has been duly notified of the intent of the board to do so. On application of any person feeling aggrieved, the board shall review the assessment or classification, or both, and correct it as appears just. The board may not make an individual market value adjustment or classification change that would benefit the property if the owner or other person having control over the property has refused the assessor access to inspect the property and the interior of any buildings or structures as provided in section 273.20. (c) A local board may reduce assessments upon petition of the taxpayer but the total reductions must not reduce the aggregate assessment made by the county assessor by more than one percent. If the total reductions would lower the aggregate assessments made by the county assessor by more than one percent, none of the adjustments may be made. The assessor shall correct any clerical errors or double assessments discovered by the board without regard to the one percent limitation. (d) A local board does not have authority to grant an exemption or to order property removed from the tax rolls. (e) A majority of the members may act at the meeting, and adjourn from day to day until they finish hearing the cases presented. The assessor shall attend, with the assessment books and 46 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes e papers, and take part in the proceedings, but must not vote. The county assessor, or an assistant delegated by the county assessor shall attend the meetings. The board shall list separately, on a form appended to the assessment book, all omitted property added to the list by the board and all ' items of property increased or decreased, with the market value of each item of property, added or changed by the board, placed opposite the item. The county assessor shall enter all changes made by the board in the assessment book. 1 (f) Except as provided in subdivision 3, if a person fails to appear in person, by counsel, or by written communication before the board after being duly notified of the board's intent to raise the assessment of the property, or if a person feeling aggrieved by an assessment or classification fails to apply for a review of the assessment or classification, the person may not appear before the county board of appeal and equalization for a review of the assessment or classification. This ' paragraph does not apply if an assessment was made after the local board meeting, as provided in section 273.01, or if the person can establish not having received notice of market value at least five days before the local board meeting. 1 (g) The local board must complete its work and adjourn within 20 days from the time of convening stated in the notice of the clerk, unless a longer period is approved by the commissioner ' of revenue. No action taken after that date is valid. All complaints about an assessment or classification made after the meeting of the board must be heard and determined by the county board of equalization. A nonresident may, at any time, before the meeting of the board file written objections to an assessment or classification with the county assessor. The objections must be presented to the board at its meeting by the county assessor for its consideration. Subd. 2. Special board; duties delegated. The governing body of a city, including a city 1 whose charter provides for a board of equalization, may appoint a special board of review. The city may delegate to the special board of review all of the powers and duties in subdivision 1. ' The special board of review shall serve at the direction and discretion of the appointing body, subject to the restrictions imposed by law. The appointing body shall determine the number of members of the board, the compensation and expenses to be paid, and the term of office of each 1 member. At least one member of the special board of review must be an appraiser, realtor, or other person familiar with property valuations in the assessment district. 1 Subd. 3. Local board duties transferred to county. The town board of any town or the governing body of any home rule charter or statutory city may transfer its powers and duties under subdivision 1 to the county board, and no longer perform the function of a local board. Before the ' town board or the governing body of a city transfers the powers and duties to the county board, the town board or city's governing body shall give public notice of the meeting at which the proposal for transfer is to be considered. The public notice shall follow the procedure contained in 1 section 13D.04, subdivision 2. A transfer of duties as permitted under this subdivision must be communicated to the county assessor, in writing, before December 1 of any year to be effective for the following year's assessment. This transfer of duties to the county may either be permanent or for a specified number of years, provided that the transfer cannot be for less than three years. Its length must be stated in writing. A town or city may renew its option to transfer. The option to transfer duties under this subdivision is only available to a town or city whose assessment is done by the county. History: (2034) RL s 847; 1941 c 402 s 1; 1945 c 402 s 1; 1949 c 543 s 1; Ex1967 c 32 art 8 1 s3; 1971 c434s3; 1971 c564s6; 1973c 123 art 5s 7; 1973c 150s 1; 1973c582s3; 1975c 1 47 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 339 s 5; 1977 c 434 s 11; 1986 c 444; 1987 c 229 art 4 s 1; 1987 c 268 art 7 s 37 ;; 1988 c 719 art 7 s 8; 1990 c 480 art 7 s 14; 1995 c 264 art 3 s 13; 1997 c 231 art 2 s 23; 1998 c 254 art 1 s 77; 1999 c 243 art 5 s 25; 1 Sp2001 c 5 art 7 s 21; 2003 c 127 art 5 s 22; 1 Sp2005 c 3 art 1 s 18 Anoka County City of LinoLakes 274.014 LOCAL BOARDS; APPEALS AND EQUALIZATION COURSE AND MEETING REQUIREMENTS. Subdivision 1. Handbook for local boards. By no later than January 1, 2005, the commissioner of revenue must develop a handbook detailing procedures, responsibilities, and requirements for local boards of appeal and equalization. The handbook must include, but need not be limited to, the role of the local board in the assessment process, the legal and policy reasons for fair and impartial appeal and equalization hearings, local board meeting procedures that foster fair and impartial assessment reviews and other best practices recommendations, quorum requirements for local boards, and explanations of alternate methods of appeal. Subd. 2. Appeals and equalization course. Beginning in 2006, and each year thereafter, there must be at least one member at each meeting of a local board of appeal and equalization who has attended an appeals and equalization course developed or approved by the commissioner within the last four years, as certified by the commissioner. The course may be offered in conjunction with a meeting of the Minnesota League of Cities or the Minnesota Association of Townships. The course content must include, but need not be limited to, a review of the handbook developed by the commissioner under subdivision 1. Subd. 3. Proof of compliance; transfer of duties. (a) Any city or town that conducts local boards of appeal and equalization meetings must provide proof to the county assessor by December 1, 2006, and each year thereafter, that it is in compliance with the requirements of subdivision 2. Beginning in 2006, this notice must also verify that there was a quorum of voting members at each meeting of the board of appeal and equalization in the current year. A city or town that does not comply with these requirements is deemed to have transferred its board of appeal and equalization powers to the county beginning with the following year's assessment and continuing unless the powers are reinstated under paragraph (c). (b) The county shall notify the taxpayers when the board of appeal and equalization for a city or town has been transferred to the county under this subdivision and, prior to the meeting time of the county board of equalization, the county shall make available to those taxpayers a procedure for a review of the assessments, including, but not limited to, open book meetings. This alternate review process shall take place in April and May. (c) A local board whose powers are transferred to the county under this subdivision may be reinstated by resolution of the governing body of the city or town and upon proof of compliance with the requirements of subdivision 2. The resolution and proofs must be provided to the county assessor by December 1 in order to be effective for the following year's assessment. History: 2003 c 127 art 2 s 16; 2005 c 151 art 5 s 25,26 49 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Anoka County City of LinoLakes ' Appraisal Terminology CLASSIFICATION The class that a type of property is assigned. A property's classification is based upon the existing use of the property. If the land is vacant and there is no identifiable use, the proper classification would be the most probable use of the land, which would most likely be determined by the zoning classification. ' CLASSIFICATION RATES The class rate assigned to a particular classification of property. Classification rates are established by the state legislature. Class rates are 1 the same upon the same class of property throughout Minnesota. COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION Average deviation of a group of numbers from the 1 median, expressed as a percentage of the median. COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION Standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the mean. COMPARABLES (COMPARABLE SALES) Recently sold properties that are similar in 1 important respects to a property being appraised to assist in estimating the value of a specific property. COST APPROACH That approach in appraisal analysis which is based on the ' proposition that the informed purchaser would pay no more than the cost of producing a substitute property with the same utility as the subject property. It is particularly applicable when the property being appraised involves relatively new improvements ' which represent the highest and best use of the land or when relatively unique or specialized improvements are located on the site and for which there exist no comparable properties on the market. DEPRECIATION A Toss of utility and, hence, value from any cause. An effect caused by deterioration and /or obsolescence. Deterioration or physical depreciation is evidenced by wear and tear, decay, dry rot, cracks, encrustational or structural defects. Obsolescence is divisible into two parts, functional and economic. Functional obsolescence may be due to poor floor plan, mechanical inadequacy or over adequacy, ' functional inadequacy or over adequacy due to size, style, age, etc. It is evidenced by conditions within the property. Economic obsolescence is caused by changes external to the property, such as neighborhood infiltrations of inharmonious groups or property uses, legislation, etc. It is also the actual decline in market value of the improvement to land from time of purchase to the time of resale. ■ CURABLE DEPRECIATION Those items of physical deterioration and ' functional obsolescence which are economically feasible to cure and hence are customarily repaired or replaced by a prudent property owner. The estimate of this depreciation is usually computed as a dollar amount of the cost -to -cure. • INCURABLE DEPRECIATION Elements of physical deterioration or functional obsolescence which either cannot be corrected; or, if possible to correct, cannot be corrected except at a cost in excess of their contribution to the value of the property. 1 1 51 Anoka County City of LinoLakes PHYSICAL DEPRECIATION A reduction in utility resulting from an impairment of physical condition. For purposes of appraisal analysis, it is most common and convenient to divide physical deterioration into curable and incurable components. • PHYSICAL CURABLE DEPRECIATION Physical deterioration which the prudent buyer would anticipate correction upon purchase of the property. The cost of effecting the correction or cure would be no more than the anticipated addition to utility, and hence ultimately to value, associated with the cure. • PHYSICAL INCURABLE DEPRECIATION Physical deterioration which in terms of market conditions as of the date of the appraisal is not feasible or economically justified to correct. The cost of correcting the condition or effecting a cure is estimated to be greater than the anticipated increase in utility, and hence ultimately in value of the property that will result from correcting or curing the condition. FUNCTIONAL DEPRECIATION Impairment of functional capacity or efficiency. Functional obsolescence reflects the loss in value brought about by such factors as overcapacity, inadequacy and changes in the art, that affect the property item itself or its relation with other items comprising a larger property. The inability of a structure to perform adequately the function for which it is currently employed. FUNCTIONAL CURABLE DEPRECIATION Functional obsolescence which may be corrected or cured when the cost of replacing the outmoded or unaccep -table component is at least offset by the anticipated increase in utility, and hence ultimately in value, resulting from the replacement. • FUNCTIONAL INCURABLE DEPRECIATION Functional obsolescence that results from structural deficiencies or superadequacies that the prudent purchaser or owner would not be justified in replacing, adding or removing, because the cost of effecting a cure would be greater than the anticipated increase in utility resulting from the replacement, addition or removal. ECONOMIC OBSOLESCENCE Impairment of desirability or useful life arising from factors external to the property, such as economic forces of environmental changes which affect supply- demand relationships in the market. Loss in the use and value of a property arising from the factors of economic obsolescence is to be distinguished from loss in value from physical deterioration and functional obsolescence, both of which are inherent to the property. Also referred to as Locational or Environmental Obsolescence. EASEMENT A right held by one person to use the land of another for a specific purpose such as access to other property. EQUALIZATION The adjustment of estimated market valuation of real property in a particular area to establish a more equitable division of the total tax burden within the area. ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE Represents the assessor's estimate of the property's actual market value. Market value is defined as the most probable price that a well informed buyer would pay a well informed seller for a property without either party being unduly forced to buy or sell. In other words, what the property would likely sell for if it 52 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes I were to be sold in an arm's length transaction. Although the sale price of a property often reflects the market value; market value and sale price are not always synonymous. 1 GRADING OF PROPERTY The process used by an appraiser to identify the quality of construction in the physical structure. I HIGHEST AND BEST USE That reasonable and probable use that will support the highest present value, as defined, as of the effective date of an appraisal. HOMESTEAD For property tax purposes, homestead is a tax benefit granted to property owners (or qualifying relatives) who are Minnesota residents and who own and occupy their home as their primary place of residence. Homestead is a fact question which may require the assessor to utilize a number of indicators to determine if it is being appropriately claimed. Although factors such as mailing address and drivers license may sometimes be useful indicators to determine where a person lives, in the ' final analysis, the question comes down to, "Is the residence occupied as the applicant's primary place of residence?' In other words, do they actually live there? If the answer is no, no amount of supporting documentation such as voter registrations or mailing addresses can alter the fact. IMPROVED LAND Land having either on -site improvements, off -site improvements or both. IMPROVEMENT A structure or building permanently attached to the land. INCOME APPROACH That procedure in appraisal analysis which converts anticipated benefits (dollar income or amenities) to be derived from the ownership of property into a value estimate. The income approach is widely applied in appraising income - producing ' properties. Anticipated future income and /or revisions are discounted to a present worth figure through the capitalization process. INDEX OF REGRESSION Mean assessment ratio divided by the sales weighted- aggregate ratio. LEGAL DESCRIPTION A statement containing a designation by which land is identified 1 according to a system set up by law or approved by law. LIMITED MARKET VALUE A limitation which is imposed on how much the taxable 1 value of certain classes of property (agricultural homestead or nonhomestead, residential homestead or nonhomestead, noncommercial seasonal recreational residential) can increase over the preceding year's value. This limit does not apply to 1 an increase in your value due to improvement made to the property. MARKET APPROACH Traditionally, an appraisal procedure in which the market value ' estimate is predicated upon prices paid in actual market transactions and current listings, the former fixing the lower limit of value in a static or advancing market (price wise), and fixing the higher limit of value in a declining market; and the latter fixing the e higher limit in any market. It is a process of analyzing sales of similar recently sold properties in order to derive an indication of the most probable sales price of the property being appraised. The reliability of this technique is dependent upon (a) the availability of comparable sales data, (b) the verification of the sales data, (c) the degree 1 53 Anoka County City of LinoLakes of comparability or extent of adjustment necessary for time differences; and (d) the absence of non - typical conditions affecting the sale price. MASS APPRAISING A method used in revaluation of a community for tax purposes. As the term implies, it is a method of appraising a large number of properties at one time by adopting standard techniques, and giving due consideration to the appraisal process so that uniformity or equality of values may be achieved between all properties. MEAN ASSESSMENT RATIO Total of ratios divided by number of properties. MEDIAN ASSESSMENT RATIO Middle assessment ratio or the average of the two middle terms when the ratios are lined up from low to high. METES AND BOUNDS A description of a parcel of land by reference to the courses (bearings, that is, the angles East or West of due North and due South) and distances (usually feet or chains) of each straight line which forms its boundary, with one of the corners tied to an established point; that is, the bearing and distance from an established point, such as a section corner or to the intersection of the center lines of two roads, etc. If one part of the boundary is on a curve, this part is described by showing the number of degrees of the central angle subtended by the curve (arc), the length of the radius and the length along the curve. MODE Assessment -ratio that appears most frequently. NET TAX CAPACITY New for payable 1990. Is used to extend taxes in accordance to multiplying the market value by the appropriate class rate. OBSOLESCENCE One of the causes of depreciation. It is the impairment of desirability and usefulness brought about by new inventions, current changes in design and improved processes for production, or from external influencing factors, which make a property less desirable and valuable for a continued use. Obsolescence may be either economic or functional. PARCEL A piece of land, regardless of size in one ownership. PROPERTY CLASS The class that has been assigned to the property based upon the use of the property. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER A geographically related parcel numbering system. The number contains twelve digits made up of section, township, range, quarter - quarter and parcel. The first six digits, based on the public land survey, geographically locate the section in which the property is located. The next two digits will designate in which quarter - quarter the property is located. The ninth through twelfth digits indicate the parcel within the quarter- quarter. The parcels will be numbered consecutively beginning with 0001. When a division is made, the next consecutive available number(s) will be assigned, and the old number(s) will be retained for historical data. RANGE Difference between the high sales ratio and the low sales ratio. 54 Anoka County City of LinoLakes REVALUATION The mass appraisal of all property within an assessment jurisdiction to obtain equalization of estimated market values. Reappraisal of a former assessment. SALES ASSESSMENT RATIO The ratio derived by dividing the estimated market value by the selling price. AGGREGATE RATIO The ratio determined by dividing the total estimated market value of all sales by the total selling prices. AVERAGE MEAN The total of all the ratios in a given set divided by the number of items in the set. MEDIAN RATIO The value of the middle item where an odd number of items are arranged (arrayed) according to size, or the arithmetic average of the two central items if there is an even number of items. It is a positional average and is not affected by the size of extreme values. SALES WEIGHTED AGGREGATE RATIO Total of assessment values divided by total of selling price. SAMPLE SUFFICIENCY GAUGE Square root of half the range divided by the number of properties. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT A charge made by government against real estate to defray the cost of making a public improvement adjacent to the property which, while of general community benefit, is of special benefit to the property so assessed. STANDARD DEVIATION Square root of total of squared deviations from mean divided by number of properties. TAX CAPACITY RATE (Local Tax Rate): Determined by dividing a taxing district's property tax levy by the taxing districts total net tax capacity. The tax capacity rate is expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity. TOPOGRAPHY The contour of land surface, i.e., flat, rolling, mountainous, etc. TRUTH IN TAXATION Provides taxpayers with a preliminary property tax notifica -tion if any taxing district proposes to increase taxes through proposed budget increases. Included on the notification is the market value, classification, a proposed tax by taxing district, and time and place of taxing district budget hearings. UNIMPROVED LAND Land without buildings, in its natural state. VACANT LAND Land without buildings. May or may not have improvements such as grading, sewer, etc. VALUE EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS (THIS OLD HOUSE) Qualifying homes, 35 years or older, were previously eligible to receive a temporary exemption on all or a portion of the assessor's estimated value for certain newly constructed improvements with an assessed value of $1,000 or more if a building permit was issued by June 30, 1999. Legislative action in 1999 amended this law effective July 1, 1999 that to qualify for exemption of improvements from the property tax, the property 55 Anoka County City of LinoLakes must be 45 years of age or older at the time the improvements commence and the property must be receiving the homestead classification. The minimum assessed value must be $5,000 for eligible improvement. This includes properties classified as residential homestead (including duplexes and triplexes), blind /paraplegic veteran /disabled homestead and agricultural homestead. In addition, the owner must have taken out a building permit and file an application for the exemption with the assessor. This law has since expired and only improvements made prior to January 2, 2003 are eligible. 56 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Appeals Procedure Each spring Anoka County sends out a property tax bill (based on the prior year assessment) along with a notice of the new assessment. Three factors that affect the tax bill are: 1. The amount your local governments (town, city, county, etc.) spend to provide services to your community; 2. The estimated market value of your property; 3. The classification of your property (how it is used). The assessor determines the final two factors. You may appeal the value or classification of your property as described below. Informal Appeal • Property owners are encouraged to call the appraiser or assessor whenever they have questions or concerns about their market value, classification of the property, or the assessment process. • • • • Almost all questions can be answered during this informal appeal process. When taxpayers call questioning their market value, every effort is made to make an appointment to inspect properties that were not previously inspected. If the data on the property is correct, the appraiser is able to show the property owner other sales in the market that support the estimated market value. If errors are found during the inspection, or other factors indicate a value reduction is warranted, the appraiser can easily make the changes at this time. Local Board of Appeal and Equalization • The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization is typically made up of city council members or township board members. • The Board meets during late April and early May. • Taxpayers can make their appeal in person or by letter. • The assessor is present to answer any questions and present evidence supporting their value. County Board of Appeal and Equalization In order to appeal to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization, a property owner must first appeal to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. 57 Anoka County City of LinoLakes • • The County Board of Appeal and Equalization follows the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization in the assessment appeals process. Their role is to ensure equalization among individual assessment districts and classes of property. • The board meets during the Final ten working days in June. • A taxpayer must first appeal to the local board before appealing to the county board. Decisions of the County Board of Appeal and Equalization can be appealed to tax court. Minnesota Tax Court The Tax Court has statewide jurisdiction. Except for an appeal to the Supreme Court, the Tax Court shall be the sole, exclusive and final authority for the hearing and determination of all questions of law and fact arising under the tax laws of the state. There are two divisions of tax court: the small claims division and the regular division. The Small Claims Division of the Tax Court only hears appeals involving one of the following situations: • The assessor's estimated market value of the property is <$300,000 • The entire parcel is classified as a residential homestead and the parcel contains no more than one dwelling unit. • The entire property is classified as an agricultural homestead. • Appeals involving the denial of a current year application for homestead classification of the property. The proceedings of the small claims division are less formal and property owners often represent themselves. There is no official record of the proceedings. Decisions made by the small claims division are final and cannot be appealed further. Small claims decisions do not set precedent. The Regular Division of the Tax Court will hear all appeals, including those with the jurisdiction of the small claims division. Decisions made here can be appealed to a higher court. The principal office for the Tax Court is located in St. Paul. However, the Tax Court is a circuit court and can hold hearings at any other place within the state so that taxpayers may appear with as little inconvenience and expense to the taxpayer as possible. Appeals of property located in Anoka County are heard at the Anoka County Courthouse, with trials scheduled to begin on Thursdays. Three judges make up the Tax Court. Each may hear and decide cases independently. However, a case may be tried before the entire court under certain circumstances. The petitioner must file in tax court on or before April 30 of the year in which the tax is payable. The following page is a sample Valuation Notice. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Property Records and Taxation Michael R. Sutherland Anoka County Assessor 2100 3b Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 -2281 (763)323 -5475 Notice of Valuation and Classification — County of Anoka - This is not a bill — This form is to notify you of the market value and classification of your property for assessment year 2007. The property taxes you will pay in 2008 will be based on this valuation and classification. If you believe your valuation and property class are correct, it is not necessary to contact your assessor or attend any listed meeting. If the property information is not correct, you disagree with the values, or you have other questions about this notice, please contact your assessor first to discuss any questions or concems. Often your issues can be resolved at this level. If your questions or concems are not resolved, more formal appeal options are available. Please read the back of this notice for important information about the formal appeal process. Property Information (legal description and /or property address) Parcel I.D.: Property Classification Assessment Year 2006 Assessment Year 2007 Property Valuation Assessment Year Assessment Year 2006 2007 Taxable Market Value Please read the back of this notice for important appeal information. 59 Anoka County City of LinoLakes Appealing the value or classification of your property Informal appeal options - Contact your assessor If you disagree with the classification or estimated market value for your property for 2007, please contact your assessor's office first to discuss your concerns. Often your issues can be resolved at this level. Contact information for your assessor's office is on the other side of this notice. Some jurisdictions choose to hold open book meetings to allow property owners to discuss their concerns with the assessor. If this is an option available to you, the meeting time(s) and location(s) will be indicated on the other side of this notice. Formal appeal options If your questions or concerns are not resolved after meeting with your assessor, you have two formal appeal options: Option 1— The Boards of Appeal and Equalization You may appear before the Boards of Appeal and Equalization in person, through a letter, or through a representative authorized by you. The meeting times and locations are on the other side of this notice. You must have presented your case to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization BEFORE going to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. Step 1 — Local Board of Appeal and Equalization If you believe your value or classification is incorrect, you may bring your case to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. Please contact your assessor's office for more information. If your city or township no longer has a Local Board of Appeal and Equalization (as indicated on the other side of this notice) you may appeal directly to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. Step 2 — County Board of Appeal and Equalization If the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization did not resolve your concerns, you may bring your case to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. You must call in advance to get on the agenda. Please contact the county assessor's office to get on the agenda or for more information. Option 2 — Minnesota Tax Court Small Claims Division You may take your case directly to the Small Claims Division of Tax Court if: • The assessor's estimated market value of your property is less than $300,000; or • The entire parcel is classified as a residential homestead (la or lb) and the parcel contains no more than one dwelling unit; or • The entire property is classified as an agricultural homestead (2a or 1 b); or • You are appealing the denial of a current year application for homestead classification of your property. Regular Division Regardless of your property type or the nature of your daim, you always have the option to file directly with the Regular Division of Tax Court. You have until April 30, 2008, to file an appeal with the Small Claims Division or the Regular Division of Tax Court for your 2007 valuation and classification. For more information, contact the Minnesota Tax Court: 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd, Room 245, St. Paul, MN 55115 Phone: 651- 296 -2806 website: www.taxcourt.state.mn.us Definitions Property Classification — The statutory classification that has been assigned to your property based upon your use of the property. A change in classification of your property can have a significant impact on the real estate tax payable. Please compare the 2006 and 2007 classifications listed on the other side of this statement. Estimated Market Value — This value is what the assessor estimates your property would likely sell for on the open market. State law requires assessors to value property at 100 percent of market value. Value of New Improvements — This is the assessor's estimate of the value of new or previously unassessed improvements you have made to your property. These improvements are not eligible for limited market value. Limited Market Value — Limits how much the taxable value of certain properties can increase. With the exception of new improvements, the value is limited to the greater of: 1) 15 percent increase over last year's limited market value or 2) 33 percent of the difference between this year's estimated market value and last year's limited market value. This only applies to agricultural, residential, timberland, or noncommercial seasonal recreational residential (cabins) property. Green Acres — Only applies to agricultural property that is facing increasing values due to development pressures not related to the agricultural value of the land. The assessor arrives at this lower value by looking at what comparable agricultural land is selling for in areas where there is not development pressure. The taxes on the higher value are deferred until the property is sold or no longer qualifies for the program. Plat Deferment — For land that has been recently platted (divided into individual lots) but not yet improved with a structure, the increased market value due to platting is added over a phase -in period. If construction begins before the expiration of the phase -in period, the lot will be assessed at full market value in the next assessment. This Old House Exclusion — This program expired with the 2003 assessment. However, property may still be receiving the value exclusion under this program. Applied only to homestead property 45 years of age or older and valued at less than $400,000. Improvements that increased the estimated market value by $5,000 or more were eligible to have some of the value deferred for a maximum of 10 years. After this time, the deferred value is phased in. Taxable Market Value — This is the value that your property taxes are actually based on, after all reductions, limitations, exemptions and deferrals. Your 2007 value, along with the class rate and the budgets of your local government, will determine how much you will pay in taxes in 2008. For more information on appeals, check out the Department of Revenue website: http: / /taves.state.mn.us 60 1 Anoka County City of LinoLakes I 2006 Residential Real Estate Activity Report by the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors. 1 The 2006 Residential Real Estate Activity Report was produced by the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors and is available on their web site at this link : http: / /www.mplsrealtor.com/ Segments /Realtors /RREAR_2006.pdf Comparable 3 I 19- 31 -22 -23 -0025 co 00 N e- 0 CO M °o 0 CD °o e- e- °o CO N °o 0 e- 8100 183000 v - -- ----------- - - - - -v -- ,------ .._ -.._.. ..---......... v .v.....v.a.........v....va.a•.v. u� c VI IG 01r 1100 8 yrs older than subj and no adj was made for the 2 rms upstairs. Sale #3 also is a one sty and 7 yrs older but this sale also included that the buyer would pay half if the expense for a new septic system which I did not use in the adjustments. All comparisons are in the same neighborhood and land values are the same. 7048 Lakeview 174.900 Nov 16,05 975001 N 2.75 1953 AVG N .c.- 848 YES NO FA YES YES NO YES YES NO NO NO Z 0 0 NO r u O 0 CO O O e- p S O N.0 T,- p S O I,- Co m 0 ci 0) Comparable 2 19-31-22-22-00231 7164 Sunset 173,9001 Nov 23,05 97500 1 1/4 sty 2.75 1948 AVG vt e- 965 NO AYES NO [NO Z>- NO NO NO 0 {( 0 r- �O e? pO <� e CV -500' -50001 - 2,300' 188,500 Comparable 1 19- 31 -22 -22 -0012 7117 Sunrise 0 O 0) e- Oct 31,05 O to 0) a) 3 1952 AVG N 1 888 YES Z LU >+Z U. ZZ NO YES ON SBA S3A Z Subject 19- 31 -22 -22 -0014 7133 Sunrise Dr O O d7 97500 1 1/4sty 2.5 1960 AVG •�e-0) ON ON S3A S3A, Y3 ON S3A 696 YES NO NO NO NO NO A 0 o 't.--'* 'Address Sale Price 0 8 d Adjustments Sale Date Close Date Location SiteNiew Ts N a a c rn ai 0 Const Quality Age Condition (Rooms Above Grade Bedroom Bath Gross Lvg Area Basement Bsmt/Fin Heating /Cooling Garage Porch Scrn Porch Fireplace Aircond Drive Brick Decks Walkout Bow Net Adjustments Indicated Value Average Value MA' +3? IX Home l Search t My Matrix Finance 1 Roster . Tax Tax 1 PID# Search 1 General Search ! Full Search Result 1 of 1. Checked 0. Check all 1. its!,`, 1 `! 1 [1] 1 Bottom 1 Single Line display Open House } History j Home Base Page 1 of 2 Welcome Rose Ann i'lor Monday, April 09, ,'GC);' MLS Co -op Help I Logoui ANOK - Anoka County Full Tax Display PID #: 193122220014 Plat Property Type: Residential Tax Year: 2006 Property Information for 7133 Sunrise Dr , Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Lot /Block: 14/1 Parcel Size: Acres: 0.81 Year Built: 1960 Subdivision (Addn): School District: County Prop Type: Homestead Code: HS Code Last Yr: Legal Description: LEXINGTON PARK LAKE VIEW 12 - Centennial 2110 Homestead 1 Lexington Park Lake View Lot 14 Blk 1 Lex Park Lake View /Subj To 5 Ft Ease Across Rear &Side For Pub Utilities/ Owner /Taxpayer Information Owner Name, Address: Rose Flor, 7133 Sunrise Dr , Lino Lakes, MN, 55014 Taxpayer Name, Address: Rose Flor, 7133 Sunrise Dr , Lino Lakes, MN, 55014 Market Values /Taxes /Subrecord Market Values Land: $70,000 Building: $91,200 Total: $161,200 Sales Informations Most Recent Sale Date: 10-31 - Most Recent Sale Price: $69,90 Most Recent Sale Code: 0 - Oth Taxes Base Tax: $1,919.17 Assessment Amount: $36.09 Tax w /Assessment: $1,955.26 ('e- d2 9O 1995 0 er Detailed Dwelling Characteristics Gross Bldg SqFt: 969 Building Style: Livable SqFt: Number of Stories: First Floor SqFt: Building Shape: Second Floor SqFt: Building Condition: Basement SqFt: Building Construction: Garage SqFt: Garage Type /Capacity: Deck /Patio SqFt: Roof Type /Cover: Porch SqFt: Exterior Walls: Pool (Y /N) /SqFt: Interior Walls: Lot SqFt: 35283 Lot Size: Room Schedule Previous Sale Date: Previous Sale Price: Previous Sale Code: 1 -1/4 Story E125 *273 *125 *272 Subrecord Status Watershed: Delinquent Status: Green Acres /G.A. SqFt: Total Beds /Baths: Family /Living Rm: Dining /Other Rm: Kitchen: Fireplaces: Heat: Air: Total Rooms: Lot Zoning: 4/1.00 Level Room Bsmt 1 2 3 Bedrooms: Family Rm: Living Room: Level Room Bsmt 1 2 3 Baths Full: Baths 3/4: Baths 1/2: Room Kitchen: Fireplace: Other Room: Level Bsmt 1 2 3 Information is Believed to be Reliable But Not Guaranteed Previo s 1 Next 1 [1] 1 Top 1 Single Line display MI MN MIN 11111 111111M111111 MN 111111 1111 http: / /matrix.northstarmis.com/ Matrix / display. aspx? c= AAEAAAD * * * * *AQAAAAAAAAARAQ... 4/9/2007 MATRIX Page 1 of 2 Welcome Rose Ann Flat- Monday, April 09, 2007 Home (I`. >e:.w:wrchI My Matrix Finance Roster Tax Open House I History 1 Home Base 1 MLS Co -op f Help ! Logoui Lots & Land i General I Detail Address ! MI.S# Tod Narrowed Original results 1 Back to Original results Results 1 -3 of 3. Checked 3. Un -check all 3. <i US I > 1 [1] I Bottom 1 Property Full display listings Create Your Own Search I✓ Check Page ~' CK1 6091 Oakwood Lane , Lino Lakes, MN 55014 '�' 101 72xx Mound Court s List #: 3274848 Status: Active Map Page /Coord:79 /E1 List Price: $195,000 List Date: 09/29/2006 County: Anoka Dev Status: Finished Lot Acres: 0.530 Zoning: Residential- Single Listing Agent: Kim L Tramm 651- 636 -5100 Listing Office: TRAMM BUILDERS & REALTORS, LLC 1 Appt Phone: 651 - 636 -5100 Directions: Hodgson Road North To Ash Street (Co Rd J), West To Woodridge, North To Oakwood Lane Agent Remarks: PRIME finished lot for sale in south Lino Lakes. Lot 3 Block2 Oakwood Lane. Listing Agent is affiliated with owner entity. , Centerville, MN 55038 List #: 3122641 Status: Active Map Page /Coord:66 /C2 List Price: $275,000 List Date: 11/17/2005 County: Anoka Dev Status: Other Acres: 0.620 Zoning: Residential - Single Listing Agent: Team Boo LIc 651 - 653 -4147 Listing Office: Edina Realty, Inc. 651- 426 -7172 Appt Phone: 651 - 653 -4175 Directions: 35E N to Co Rd 14 W to Mound Trail to Mound Court Agent Remarks: Great opportunity to bring your own builder to this beautiful lot situated between two lakes with deeded lake access and dock. Buyers agent to verify measurements. CZ [01 6076 Oakwood Lane , Lino Lakes, MN 55014 List #: 3204183 Status: Sold Map Page /Coord:79 /E1 List Price: $215,000 List Date: 05/18/2006 Sold Price: $215,000 Off Mkt Date: 06/13/2006 Date Closed: 07/28/2006 County: Anoka Dev Status: Finished Lot Acres: 0.600 Zoning: Residential - Single Listing Agent: Kim L Tramm 651 - 636 -5100 Listing Office: TRAMM BUILDERS & REALTORS, LLC 1 Appt Phone: 651 - 636 -5100 Directions: HODGSON ROAD NORTH TO ASH STREET (CO RD J), WEST TO WOODRIDGE, NORTH TO OAKWOOD LANE Agent Remarks: PRIME finished lot for sale in south Lino Lakes. Lot 4 Block 1 Oakwood Lane. Listing Agent is affiliated with owner entity. http: / /matrix.northstarmis.com /Matrix /display.aspx ?c= AAEAAAD * * * * *AQAAAAAAAAARAQ... 4/9/2007 Comparative Market Analysis Minimums and Maximums This page summarizes key fields of the listings in this analysis. The listings in this analysis can be summarized as follows: Priced between $249,900 and $259,900 2 Bedrooms 1.00 to 2.00 Bathrooms 983 to 1,128 Square Feet $230 to $254 per Square Foot Built between 1999 and 2006 1 to 8 years old ce t-5 A Comparative Market Analysis S a c April 09, 2007 s �= 1-e c S -4- Lai, (2 aC Rose Ann Flor 763 - 390 -3900 Comparative Market Analysis CMA Price Adjustments This page outlines the subject property versus comparables properties. April 09, 2007 Subject Property Details Adjust Details MLS #: 3265925 3188032 Status: Pending Sold Address: 5951 Goodview Trail Alcove N 13920 Fountain Avenue N SchDist: White Bear Lake 0 White Bear Lake 0 Map: 67C2 0 67B3 0 LstPrc: $249,900 0 $259,900 0 SIdPrc: $0 0 $255,000 0 OffMrkt: 02/21/2007 0 05/04/2006 0 DtClsd: 0 06/30/2006 0 DOM: 162 0 14 0 Bedrms: 2 0 2 0 Bthrms: 1 0 2 0 Style: (SF) Split Entry 0 (SF) Four or More Level 0 (Bi- Level) Split TotSqft: 983 0 1128 0 AbvSqft: 983 0 1,128 0 BlwSqft: 0 0 0 0 GrgStls: 3 0 3 0 PrkChar: Attached Garage, 0 Attached Garage, 0 Driveway - Asphalt Driveway - Asphalt Yr Built: 2006 0 1999 0 Lk /Wt: 0 Pond 0 Lot Sz: 84X262X115X357 0 53 *204r *142b *82b *1531 0 Acres: 0.57 0 0.50 0 Fdtn Sz: 950 0 1,119 0 Ext: Brick /Stone, Metal /Vinyl 0 Brick /Stone, Metal /Vinyl 0 Roof: Age 8 Years or Less, Asphalt 5 0 Age 8 Years or Less, Asphalt S 0 #Fplcs: 0 0 0 0 Bsmt: Full, Walkout 0 Daylight /Lookout 0 Windows, Drain Tiled, Amenit: Kitchen Window, Natural 0 Kitchen Window, Natural 0 Woodwork, Washer /Dryer Woodwork, Vaulted Other 4 0 0 Other 3 0 0 Other 2 0 0 Other 1 0 0 Adjust Price: Total Adjustments: Adjusted Price: A Comparative Market Analysis $249,900 $255,000 $0 $0 $249,900 $255,000 Rose Ann Flor 763 - 390 -3900 Cornparative Market Analysis April 09, 2007 Summary of Comparable Listings This page summarizes the comparable listings contained in this market analysis. Pending Listings Address Price Bds Bth TFSF $ /Sq FSize Built Style Off Market DOM .5= 5951 Goodview Trail Alcove $249,900 2 1 983 $254 950 2006 SPEBI 02/21/2007 162 Averages: $249,900 2.0 1.0 983 $254 950 2006 162 Sold Listings Address Price Bds Bth TFSF $ /Sq FSize Built Style Sold Date DOM 5= 13920 Fountain Avenue $255,000 2 2 1128 $226 1,119 1999 FOURM 06/30/2006 14 Averages: $255,000 2.0 2.0 1128 $226 1,119 1999 14 Median of Comparable Listings: Average of Comparable Listings: $252,450 $252,450 On Average, the 'Sold' status comparable listings sold in 14.00 days for $255,000 A Comparative Market Analysis Rose Ann Flo/ 763 - 390 -390C Comparative Market Analysis Table Summary of Comparable Solds This page summarizes the comparable sold listings in this market analysis. Soid Listings Address 13920 Fountain Avenue April 09, 2007 $ Change % Change List Price to List Price to List Price Sale Price Sold Price Sold Price Sold Date DOM $259,900 $255,000 $ -4,900 -1.89 06/30/2006 14 Average Median Minimum Maximum A Comparative Market Analysis $259,900 $255,000 $ -4,900 -1.89 14 $259,900 $255,000 $4,900 1.89 14 $259,900 $255,000 $ -4,900 1.89 14 $259,900 $255,000 $ -4,900 1.89 14 Rose Ann Flor 763 - 390 -3900 Cornparative Market Analysis Minimums and Maximums This page summarizes key fields of the listings in this analysis. The listings in this analysis can be summarized as follows: Priced between $155,000 and $184,900 2 to 4 Bedrooms 1.00 Bathroom 900 to 1,528 Square Feet $105 to $173 per Square Foot Built between 1950 and 1954 53 to 57 years old April 09, 2007 STheo,r ! S0ke0 I D��S @ck-'"1 kr0 0M A Comparative Market Analysis Rose Ann Flor 763 - 390 -3900 Comparative Market Analysis CMA Price Adjustments This page outlines the subject property versus comparables properties. Subject Property MLS #: Status: Address: SchDist: Map: LstPrc: SIdPrc: OffMrkt: DtClsd: DOM: Bedrms: Bthrms: Style: April 09, 2007 Details 3155899 Sold 12 East Road Centennial 65D3 $155,000 $145,000 02/23/2006 03/10/2006 2 3 1 (SF) One 1/2 Stories Adjust Details 3140452 Sold 15 Park Drive 0 Centennial 0 65E3 0 $155,500 0 $150,000 0 05/09/2006 0 06/02/2006 0 107 0 3 0 1 0 (SF) One 1/2 Stories Adjust 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TotSqft: 1296 0 900 0 AbvSqft: 960 0 900 0 BlwSqft: 336 0 0 0 GrgStls: 2 0 2 0 PrkChar: Detached Garage 0 Detached Garage 0 Yr Built: 1954 0 1953 0 Lk /Wt: 0 0 Lot Sz: 75x135 0 E75x135x84x135 0 Acres: 0.23 0 0.00 0 Fdtn Sz: 720 0 674 0 Ext: Wood 0 Other 0 Roof: 0 0 #Fplcs: 2 0 0 0 Bsmt: Full 0 Full 0 Amenit: 0 0 Other 4 0 0 Other 3 0 0 Other 2 0 0 Other 1 0 0 Price: Total Adjustments: Adjusted Price: A Comparative Market Analysis $145,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $145,000 $150,000 Rose Ann Flor 763 - 390 -3900 Comparative Market Analysis CMA Price Adjustments This page outlines the subject property versus comparables properties. Subject Property MLS #: Status: Address: SchDist: Map: LstPrc: SIdPrc: OffMrkt: DtClsd: DOM: Bedrms: Bthrms: Style: April 09, 2007 Details 3243427 Sold 42 Center Road Centennial 65D3 $159,900 $155,000 09/21/2006 10/16/2006 52 3 1. (SF) One 1/2 Stories Adjust Details 3179951 Sold 9151 Dunlap Avenue 0 Centennial 0 65C4 0 $169,900 0 $177,000 0 04/24/2006 0 05/26/2006 0 17 0 3 0 1 0 (SF) One 1/2 Stories Adjust 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TotSqft: 1528 0 1338 0 AbvSqft: 1,060 0 996 0 BlwSqft: 468 0 342 0 GrgStls: 2 0 1 0 PrkChar: Detached Garage 0 Detached Garage, 0 Driveway - Asphalt, Yr Built: 1954 0 1950 0 Lk /Wt: 0 0 Lot Sz: 77x135x76x124 0 80X132 0 Acres: 0.25 0 0.00 0 Fdtn Sz: 734 0 672 0 Ext: Metal /Vinyl 0 Metal /Vinyl 0 Roof: Asphalt Shingles 0 Age 8 Years or Less, Asphalt 5 0 #Fplcs: 0 0 0 0 Bsmt: Full 0 Full 0 Amenit: 0 Hardwood Floors, Kitchen 0 Window, Natural Other 4 0 0 Other 3 0 0 Other 2 0 0 Other 1 0 0 Price: Total Adjustments: Adjusted Price: A Comparative Market Analysis $155,000 $177,000 $0 $0 $155,000 $177,000 Rose Ann Flor 763 - 390 -3900 Comparative Market Analysis CMA Price Adjustments This page outlines the subject property versus comparables properties. Subject Property MLS #: Status: Address: SchDist: Map: LstPrc: SIdPrc: OffMrkt: DtClsd: DOM: Bedrms: Bthrms: Style: April 09, 2007 Details 3118524 Sold 17 Circle Drive Centennial 65d3 $173,900 $173,900 02/04/2006 02/21/2006 85 2 1 (SF) One 1/2 Stories Adjust Details 3105916 Sold 38 Center Road Adjust 0 Centennial 0 0 65E3 0 0 $179,900 '0 0 $170,000 0 0 01/23/2006 0 0 02/09/2006 0 0 104 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 (SF) One 1/2 Stories 0 TotSqft: 1007 0 1154 0 AbvSqft: 699 0 1,154 0 BlwSqft: 308 0 0 0 GrgStls: 2 0 2 0 PrkChar: Detached Garage, 0 Detached Garage, 0 Driveway - Concrete, Driveway - Concrete, Yr Built: 1953 0 1954 0 Lk /Wt: 0 0 Lot Sz: 75x135x94x135 0 77x134x77x137 0 Acres: 0.26 0 0.23 0 Fdtn Sz: 699 0 674 0 Ext: Metal /Vinyl 0 Metal /Vinyl 0 Roof: Age 8 Years or Less, Asphalt 5 0 Age 8 Years or Less, Asphalt S 0 #Fplcs: 0 0 0 0 Bsmt: Full 0 Daylight /Lookout 0 Windows, Full Amenit: Deck, Hardwood Floors, 0 Hardwood Floors, Kitchen 0 Kitchen Window, Window, Natural Other 4 0 0 Other 3 0 0 Other 2 0 0 Other 1 0 0 Price: Total Adjustments: Adjusted Price: A Comparative Market Analysis $173,900 $170,000 $0 $0 $173,900 $170,000 Rose Ann Flor 763 - 390 -3900 Comparative Market Analysis CMA Price Adjustments This page outlines the subject property versus comparables properties. Subject Property M LS# : Status: Address: SchDist: Map: LstPrc: SIdPrc: OffMrkt: DtClsd: DOM: Bedrms: Bthrms: Style: Details 3194074 Sold 12 Crossway Drive Centennial 65D3 $184,900 $180,000 06/23/2006 07/31/2006 53 4 1 (SF) One 1/2 Stories Adjust 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TotSqft: 1290 0 AbvSqft: 990 0 BlwSqft: 300 0 GrgStls: 2 0 PrkChar: Detached Garage, 0 Driveway - Concrete, Yr Built: 1953 0 Lk /Wt: 0 Lot Sz: 125x165x55x138 0 Acres: 0.32 0 Fdtn Sz: 660 0 Ext: Metal /Vinyl 0 Roof: Age 8 Years or Less, Asphalt S 0 #Fplcs: 0 0 Bsmt: Daylight /Lookout 0 Windows, Egress Amenit: Hardwood Floors, Kitchen 0 Window, Natural Other 4 Other 3 Other 2 Other 1 Price: Total Adjustments: Adjusted Price: A Comparative Market Analysis 0 0 0 0 $180,000 $0 $180,000 April 09, 2007 Rose Ann Flor 763 - 390 -3900 comparative Market Analysis April 09, 2007 Summary of Comparable Listings This page summarizes the comparable listings contained in this market analysis. Sold Listings Address Price Bds Bth TFSF $ /Sq FSize Built Style Sold Date DOM S= 12 East Road $145,000 3 1 1296 $112 720 1954 ONEHF 03/10/2006 2 15 Park Drive $150,000 3 1 900 $167 674 1953 ONEHF 06/02/2006 107 42 Center Road $155,000 3 1 1528 $101 734 1954 ONEHF 10/16/2006 52 9151 Dunlap Avenue $177,000 3 1 1338 $132 672 1950 ONEHF 05/26/2006 17 17 Circle Drive $173,900 2 1 1007 $173 699 1953 ONEHF 02/21/2006 85 38 Center Road $170,000 3 1 1154 $147 674 1954 ONEHF 02/09/2006 104 12 Crossway Drive $180,000 4 1 1290 $140 660 1953 ONEHF 07/31/2006 53 Averages: $164,414 3.0 1.0 1216 $139 690 1953 60 Median of Comparable Listings: Average of Comparable Listings: $170,000 $164,414 On Average, the 'Sold' status comparable listings sold in 60.00 days for $164,414 A Comparative Market Analysis Rose Ann FIoi 763-390-390C Comparative Market Analysis Table Summary of Comparable Solds This page summarizes the comparable sold listings in this market analysis. Sold Listings $ Change % Change List Price to List Price to Address List Price Sale Price Sold Price Sold Price Sold Date DOM 12 East Road $155,000 $145,000 $- 10,000 -6.45 03/10/2006 2 15 Park Drive $155,500 $150,000 $-5,500 -3.54 06/02/2006 107 42 Center Road $159,900 $155,000 $ -4,900 -3.06 10/16/2006 52 9151 Dunlap Avenue $169,900 $177,000 $7,100 4.18 05/26/2006 17 17 Circle Drive $173,900 $173,900 $0 0.00 02/21/2006 85 38 Center Road $179,900 $170,000 $-9,900 -5.50 02/09/2006 104 12 Crossway Drive $184,900 $180,000 $ -4,900 -2.65 07/31/2006 53 April 09, 2007 Average Median Minimum Maximum A Comparative Market Analysis $168,429 $164,414 $ -4,014 -2.43 60 $169,900 $170,000 $4,900 3.06 53 $155,000 $145,000 $- 10,000 6.45 2 $184,900 $180,000 $7,100 -4.18 107 Rose Ann Flor 763 - 390-3900 6832 Black Duck Drive Page.-1 of 1 To print this flyer in PDF format, Click Here. If you have Adobe Acrobat version 5.0 or earlier, when printing the document please make sure the "print as an image" box is selected. Click Here for more help. 6832 Black Duck Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 MLS #: 3237733 0 .1 ♦ x V .A -VAN N k STls G R 0 1. P Style: Three Level Split Year Built: 1985 Bedrooms /Bathrooms: 3 Bedrooms, 2 Baths Sq.Feet: 2160 Lot SizelAcreage: 123 x 160 x 50 x 155 School Info: Centennial Taxes: $3,739 Prime; Agiteriee611709 Spacious three level home with an open, flowing floor plan. Soaring ceilings, ceramic tile floors, eat in kitchen with bayed dinette, master sutie with walk -in closet & walk -thru bath, walkout lower level family room with fireplace & wet bar, and 3- season porch. Naturalistic setting with colorful gardens, lush foliage, and tranquil pond out back! The, Vanneste Group Dave and Donna Vanneste Edina Realty 4570 Churchill. Street Shoreview, MN 55126 Direct 651.481.6711 Cell 651.216.8700 Fax 661.481.6818 Oave @No rthOaksProperties`.cotn r+ :NorthQaksPraperties.carte http:// www .theprosadvantage.coni/client content /listings /flyers /flyerl /flyer l .cfin ?listingid =6... 03/29/2007 su����V An official site of the National Flood Insurance Program Rates Effective May 1, 2006 HIGH RISK PRED8|U88 TABLE: RESIDENTIAL. Premiums for ZONES A. AE, Al-30' AO, AH(PreRRM) These premiums are based on a single family, oneUoor, no baxommrt building with a standard $500 deductible.' Your premium may be even lower if your community participates in the Community Rating System (CRS),* Coverage $ 35,000/10,000 50.000/15.000 75.000/20,000 100.000/30'000 125.000k40,000 150.000/50.000 250,000/100'000 Annual • Premium' $ 503 681 844 1,033 1,223 1,412 2,233 Coverage ---------- S 35,000 5O.O0O 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 250,000 Annual $ 398 523 633 796 906 1,016 1,441 Coverage $ 10,000 15,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 100,000 Annual Premium' $ 140 196 251 334 416 499 913 irciudes a Federal PoIicy Fee of 530 and |CCPrennum 2 nciudes a Federal Policy Fee of 530 oniy. sHigher deductible Iimits are available, up to 55,000 for single-family properties. ^TheCommunityRaUng8ysbom(CRS)ivavo|untoryincendvopnogromdlotmcognizesondencoura8escommunh3 floodpimn management activities that exceed the minimum NFIP requirements, As a result, flood insurance premium rates are discounted to reflect .the reduced flood risk resulting from the community actions. To learn more about: CRS and •k/ see if your community participates, go to FEMA's CRS Web poge, at http://www.hemu. goo/busineos/hfiV/to.shtm. Note: Replacement Cost Coverage is available for single-family dweUings that are primary residences. They must be insured to the maximum amount of insurance available under the program or no less than 80% of the replacement cost at the time of loss. Please refer to the policy or manual for further explanation and requirements. 3 Bow lAircond ronst Quality__ 0 0 c,,. I 5. a, LSL ES COMPARISON: Y SALES COMPARISON APPROACH :ET VALUE AS OF JANUARY 2, TURE DATE Yes SL Yes z 0 Yes Yes Yes Yes 2, 800 -2,000 24,800 1800 0, 1 1. Comparable 3 1 i 1 , i 1 1 ! I 1 ' , , • EXPENDITURES APRIL 9, 2007 • Date: 03/22/2007 Time: 11:26:51 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 6173 6173 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N • Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000466 KRAUS ANDERSON 1 250.11 250.11 .D0 .00 000470 MADSEN FIXTURES AND MILLWORK 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 000477 RATZ, KAKI 1 5.0D 5.00 .00 .D0 000481 LAW ENFORCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES 1 375.00 375.00 .0D .00 000489 TDS METROCOM 1 979.72 979.72 .00 .00 000537 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 1 2,611.20 2,611.20 .00 .00 000983 ADMINISTRATION RESOURCES CORPORATION 1 70.76 70.76 .00 .00 001016 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1 787.14 787.14 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 160.00 160.00 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 8,335.44 8,335.44 .00 .00 D01395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 1,052.19 1,052.19 .00 001550 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENEFITS 1 1,069.48 1,069.48 .00 0 001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 219.66 219.66 .00 .00 002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 510.00 510.00 .00 .00 002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 246.42 246.42 .0D .00 003091 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 1 416.00 416.0D .00 .00 003193 TRAPPER'S BAR AND GRILL 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 416.56 416.58 .00 .00 003260 STANSBERRY, KAY 1 62.18 62.18 .00 .00 003491 PETTY CASH 1 61.17 61.17 .00 .00 004660 URICH, TRACEY 1 89.97 89.97 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 21 17,768.02 17,768.02 .00 .00* • Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:17:46 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal ges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 6184 6184 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: 6 Sort: N Operator: JAL Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000095 ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. 1 1,027.50 1,027.50 .0D .00 000106 NELSON, ROBERT 1 150.00 150.00 .0D .00 000118 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, INC. 2 68.02 68.02 .00 .00 000134 BOLDT, ROBERT 1 170.01 170.01 .0D .00 000155 O'DEA, MARY JO 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 000191 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. 3 1,486.84 1,486.84 .00 .00 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 212.04 212.04 .00 .00 000203 WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL TIRE SYSTEMS, LLC 1 2,011.03 2,011.03 .00 .00 000221 RAFFERTY, ROBIN G. 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .0D 000370 CENTRAL COMMUINICATIONS 1 808.84 808.84 .00 .00 111/185 BROUILLET, KIMBERLY 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 1(95 DEHAVEN, MARTHA 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 6,348.00 6,348.00 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,502.58 1,502.58 .00 .00 000487 CARLSON, TOM M. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000494 HARTMANN, KURT 1 450.00 450.00 .00 .00 000499 MINN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 45,443.00 45,443.00 .00 .00 000511 LADEN, PERRY 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .0D 000538 NADEAU, PIERRE & NORMA 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000539 TARGET 1 313.28 313.28 .00 .00 000564 PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 1 65.00 65.00 .00 .00 000576 PITZEN, DAVID & KATHLEEN 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:17:46 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Discount • 000583 RON BIRCH CUSTOM BUILDERS 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 .00 000603 TOM LACASSE BUILDERS 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 .DD .00 000611 ANDRZEJEWSKI, PAULA 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000617 BROWN, PETER 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000634 TAYLOR, ALAN 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000673 LANDFORM ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. 1 675.00 675.00 .00 .D0 000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 116.83 116.83 .00 .00 000828 JASON'S BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 1 15.99 15.99 .00 .00 000846 BREEZY POINT CONFERENCE CENTER 1 3,415.0D 3,415.00 .00 .00 000B61 BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SERVICE 1 85.00 85.00 .00 .00 000879 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH P1,AN 1 44,419.44 44,419.44 .00 .00 000905 HYDEN, MICHAEL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 5 287.73 287.73 .00 .00 001082 IDENTISYS, INC. 1 426.73 426.73 .00 .DD 001101 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 33.00 33.00 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 6 1,362.55 1,362.55 .00 0 001285 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 1 19,455.95 19,455.95 .00 4 001288 MOBILE VISION, INC. 1 34.09 34.09 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 4,682.88 4,682.88 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 4,595.70 4,595.70 .00 .00 001310 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE 2 620.00 620.00 .DD .00 001480 HAWKINS INC. 1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00 D01550 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENEFITS 1 1,030.73 1,030.73 .00 .00 001621 GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC. 1 142.05 142.05 .0D .00 001768 H & L MESABI, INC. 2 532.93 532.93 .00 .D0 00185D HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 92.47 92.47 .00 .D0 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 20.00 20.00 .0D .D0 • Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:17:46 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal •r # Name Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002130 TRALLE, PAUL 1 225.00 225.00 002178 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 1,937.78 1,937.78 002296 TWIN CITY SCALE COMPANY, INC. 1 200.00 200.00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 17.53 17.53 002486 MATT PARROTT AND SONS COMPANY, INC. 1 835.07 835.07 002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 360.75 360.75 002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 8,269.73 8,269.73 002743 BCA /CRIMINAL, JUSTICE INFO SYSTEMS 1 25.00 25.00 002926 MN DEPT OF COMMERCE 1 250.00 250.00 003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 1 B8.82 B8.82 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 7,219.38 7,219.38 003465 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 56.72 56.72 003467 SHARPER HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 4 259.00 259.00 003639 QUALITY CHECKED CONSTRUCTION 1 500.00 500.00 1111000 .TEE JAY NORTH, INC. 1 118.00 118.00 49 REGISTERED ABSTRACTERS, INC. 1 320.00 320.0D 003848 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP, INC. 1 205.45 205.45 003880 SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 1 3,659.25 3,659.25 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 64.27 64.27 003990 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF 1 110.40 110.40 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 131.22 131.22 004070 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 2 327.81 327.81 004099 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 2 4,143.80 4,143.80 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 6 507.00 507.00 004308 NORTH STAR PUMP SERVICE 1 300.00 300.00 004350 T.K.D.A. 18 42,181.17 42,181.17 • .0D .00 .D0 .DD .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .D0 .DD .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0D .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0D .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0D .0D .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .D0 .DD .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0D .00 .00 .00 Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:17:47 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 1,664.69 1,664.69 .DD .00 004469 TOUSLEY FORD, INC. 1 3,464.38 3,464.38 .00 .00 004562 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD. 2 10,225.07 10,225.07 .00 .00 004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 2 610.89 610.89 .00 .00 004608 POGALZ, BRIAN 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 004609 ROOT, MICHAEL 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .D0 004666 BOR, BARBARA 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 007264 A.J. MACHINERY COMPANY, INC. 1 563.44 563.44 .00 .00 900357 TRI -STATE BOBCAT, INC. 1 100.90 100.90 .DD .00 900523 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. 1 487.50 487.50 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 130 239,370.23 239,370.23 .00 .00* • Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:23:51 Operator: JAL • Ranges: Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) 6175 (A) Options: Print Ranges /Options: Y Page on Department: N Department Vendor Name 6212 # of copies: 1 Description MAYOR /COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION NISTRATION NZSTRATIDN NISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE • AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ANOKA COUNTY RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR CENTRAL PENSION FUND PREFERRED ONE COMMUN MINNESOTA STATE RETI CENTENNIAL LAKES POL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF INTL UNION OF OPER E MN CHILD SUPPORT PAY MN NCPERS LIFE INSUR TARGET PAYROLL WITHHOLDING CERTIFY DOCUMENTS LIFE INSURANCE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING HEALTH INSURANCE PAYROLL WITHOLDING REIMBURSE CONCERT OVERTI DENTAL INSURANCE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING Total for Department SUPPLIES Total for Department 401 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMUN HEALTH INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION RESOD COBRA ADMINISTRATION DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PRESS PUBLICATIONS, ADVERTISING /ORDINANCE 01 Total for Department 402 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /rrHRUARY NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Department 406 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMUN HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Department 407 Amount 212.04 6,348.00 1,136.12 2,611.20 10,643.04 787.14 33.00 2,588.03 510.00 246.42 416.00 25,530.99* 15.07 15.07* 23.75 2,266.74 70.76 161.03 41.10 81.22 81.22 55.50 2,781.32* 4.75 48.76 47.63 5.29 5.29 111.72* 14.97 1,430.37 112.74 54.71 54.71 1,667.50* Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:23:51 Operator: JAL Department Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount ECONOMIC ECONOMIC ECONOMIC ECONOMIC ECONOMIC PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING DEVELOPMENT RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE DEVELOPMENT ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Department 415 & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE NELSON, ROBERT RAFFERTY, ROBIN G. RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LADEN, PERRY TARGET LANDFORM ENGINEERING PREFERRED ONE COMMON RYDEN, MICHAEL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE TRALLE, PAUL PRESS PUBLICATIONS, SRF CONSULTING GROUP SRF CONSULTING GROUP T.K.D.A. POGALZ, BRIAN ROOT, MICHAEL Total for T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND LIFE INSURANCE QUARTERLY STIPEND SUPPLIES CR J MASTER PLAN /FEBRUAR HEALTH INSURANCE QUARTERLY STIPEND DENTAL INSURANCE GROUP INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS QUARTERLY STIPEND ADVERTISING /P & Z CALCEL ROADWAY COST ALLOCATION TRANSPORTATION /COMP PLAN CAMP PLAN /FEBRUARY QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND Department 416 '07 GEN ENGINEERING /FEBR ;07 GEN DEVELOPER /FEBRUA HARDWOOD CREEK /FEBRUARY Total for Department 417 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE *m'r'+EL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SHORT- ELLIOTT- BENDRI GIS SERVICE /FEBRUARY Total for Department 418 ADVANCED GRAPHIR, IN CENTRAL COMMUNICATIO RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OPPO TDS METROCOM TARGET TARGET PROFESSIONAL LAW ENF JASON BOBBY & STEVE' CAR GRAPHICS VERIZON WIRELESS /FEBRUAR LIFE INSURANCE REGISTRATION /CAREER FAIR MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TRAINING /RENEE K CAR WASHES 4.75 352.18 32.20 16.42 16.42 421.97* 150.00 150.00 9.50 150.00 120.69 675.00 704.36 150.00 64.40 30.42 30.42 225.00 11.10 38.89 4,104.91 2,036.03 150.00 100.00 8,900.72* 11,745.36 130.45 348.93 12,224.74* 11.87 924.41 88.57 12.80 41.88 41.88 1,706.25 2,627.66* 1,027.50 808.84 142.5D 375.00 623.84 118.68 58.84 65.00 15.99 Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:23:51 Operator: JAL • Department Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE 111/06 ING INSPECTIONS LDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS so BREEZY POINT CONFERE PREFERRED ONE COMMUN IDENTISYS, INC. HEWLETT- PACKARD COMP MOBILE VISION,INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE BCA /CRIMINAL JUSTICE XCEL ENERGY SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL SHRED -IT, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, EXPLORERS COMPETITION HEALTH INSURANCE RIBBON LLPD COMPUTERS LAPEL MICROPHONE DENTAL INSURANCE REGISTRATION /DAVE P TRAINING /RENT S MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY GROUP INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS REPAIR LIGHTING REGISTRATION /MITCH DEMAR MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY LANYARD /BUCKLE DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT CLEANSING GEL UNIFORM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES Total for Department 420 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMUN HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Department 421 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR PREFERRED ONE COMMUN DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LIFE INSURANCE HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY GROUP INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS T.K.D.A. '07 GEN ENGINEERING /FEBR Total for Department 422 BOLDT, ROBERT RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR TDS METROCOM PREFERRED ONE COMMUN DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE H & L MESABI, INC. XCEL ENERGY A.J. MACHINERY COMPA REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY GROUP INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS BLADE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY BENDING ATACHMENT /BENDIN Total for Department 430 3,415.00 14,929.48 426.73 19,455.95 34.09 544.59 285.00 335.00 514.67 400.08 385.56 219.66 25.00 3.16 205.45 64.27 57.03 449.97 610.89 45,597.77* 14.25 1,868.34 94.37 44.51 44.51 2,065.98* 19.00 2,002.61 136.88 71.30 57.74 57.57 640.43 2,985.53* 170.01 34.91 48.76 3,292.49 236.69 42.17 101.35 90.50 532.93 4,798.83 112.68 9,461.32* Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:23:51 Operator: JAL Department Page: 4 City of Lino Lakee FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR BEE LINE ALIGNMENT S PREFERRED ONE COMMUN DEHN OIL COMPANY, IN DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LEEF BROTHER, INC. MENARDS, INC. FACTORY MOTOR PARTS PETTY CASH THANE HAWKINS POLAR A.J. MACHINERY COMPA TRI -STATE BOBCAT, IN Total for D FLEET TOOLS LASER SOCKET ELGIN SWEEPER PARTS SPROCKET /FILTER WASHERS /SPROCKETS /CHAIN/ TIRES LIFE INSURANCE 4 WHEEL ALIGN HEALTH INSURANCE GASOHOL DENTAL INSURANCE GROUP INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SHOP TOWELS SUPER GLUE SPLASHWASH VEHICLE PARTS LENS /ELECTRICAL SYSTEM BENDING ATACHMENT /BENDIN FILTERS /HYD FLUID epartment 431 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS TDS METROCOM GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PREFERRED ONE COMMUN GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CIRCLE PINES POST OF GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CIRCLE PINES, CITY 0 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS DALCO, INC. GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS DALCO, INC. GOVERMENT BUILDINGS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS TWIN CITY SCALE COMP GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS MN WEIGHTS & MEASURE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS STANSBERRY, KAY GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PETTY CASE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS TEE JAY NORTH, INC. GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS TOUSLEY FORD, INC. Total for PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY HEALTE INSURANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES PAPER TONER 1ST CLASS PREMIT /2007 MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY JANITORIAL SUPPLIES VERSAMATIC VAC DENTAL INSURANCE GROUP INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SERVICE /SCALE CALIBRATION /CERTIFICATIO REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW CLEANING PRODUCTS SERVICE /GLASS DOOR DEER COLISION REPAIR Department 432 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR PREFERRED ONE COMMUN CIRCLE PINES, CITY 0 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTL"L COMMUNICATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LIFE INSURANCE HEALTH INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY DENTAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY GROUP INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 19.39 48.63 703.12 162.95 620.77 2,011.03 5.46 85.00 646.83 4,682.88 37.03 14.81 14.81 17.53 5.25 88.82 26.54 1,664.69 112.69 100.90 11,069.13* 4.75 138.18 352.18 244.91 12.16 30.66 160.00 7,648.80 546.60 815.95 32.20 10.25 10.25 200.0D 250.00 62.18 34.63 118.00 3,464.38 14,136.08* 28.50 1,221.14 686.64 161.04 181.43 79.90 79.90 • • • Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:23:51 Operator: JAL • Department Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL •ONMENTAL ONMENTAL SOLID WASTE SOLID WASTE SOLID WASTE SOLID WASTE SOLID WASTE FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY HOFFMAN, MICHAEL REIMBURSE SPRAYER PARTS MENARDS, INC. WATER HEATER XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY URICH, TRACEY REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW A.J. MACHINERY COMPA BENDING ATACHMENT /BENDIN Total for Department 450 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR PREFERRED ONE COMMUN DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE Total for LIFE INSURANCE HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY GROUP INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Department 451 O'DEA, MARY JO BROUILLET, KIMBERLY DEHAVEN, MARTHA RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR ANDRZEJEWSKI, PAULA BROWN, PETER TAYLOR, ALAN PREFERRED ONE COMMON DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE MENARDS, INC. BOR, BARBARA Total for QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND LIFE INSURANCE QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY GROUP INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS HICKLRY /NUTSEtThk. /SCREWS QUARTERLY STIPEND Department 461 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Department 462 RELLASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMUN HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY IN5 Total for Department 463 Total for Fund 101 RATZ, KARI REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC Total for Department 92.47 189.00 413.42 89.97 112.69 3,336.10* 15.20 1,131.26 103.06 13.87 41.34 41.34 1,346.07* 225.0D 150.00 150.00 5.23 150.00 150.00 150.00 196.02 11.28 58.95 11.58 11.58 166.50 150.00 1,586.14* 1.43 201.96 9.66 4.99 4.99 223.03* 2.85 196.02 11.27 5.84 5.84 221.82* 146,510.66* 5.00 5.0D* Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:23:51 Operator: JAL Department Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description ADULT SPORTS ADULT SPORTS MADSEN FIXTURES AND REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC TRAPPER'S BAR AND GR REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC Total for Department 202 SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS SHOREVIEW, CITY OF PROGRAM REC /FIELD TRIP Total for Department 205 YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL GREG LARSON SPORTS - TENNIS BALLS Total for Department 207 Total for Fund 201 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS METRO SALES INCORPOR COPIER Total for Department 432 Total for Fund 403 OTHER SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRI GIS SERVICE /FEBRUARY OTHER T.K.D.A. '07 GEN ENGINEERING /FEBR OTHER T.K.D.A. CSAH 49 WATER*ATN /FEBRUA OTHER T.K.D.A. LOIS LANE /FEBRUARY OTHER T.K.D.A. WATER TREATMENT/FEBRUARY Total for Department 499 OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER Total for Fund 406 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, PRESS PUBLICATIONS, REED BUSINESS INFORM REED BUSINESS INFORM T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. ADVERTISING /OVERLAY ADVERTISING /SEALCOAT ADVERTISING /OVERLAY ADVERTISING /SEALCOATING '07 OVERLAY /FEBRUARY '07 SEALCOAT /FEBRUARY Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 421 OTHER SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRI GIS SERVICE /FEBRUARY OTHER T.K.D.A. '06 SURFACE WATER /FEBRUA OTHER T.K.D.A. '07 GEN ENGINEERING /FEBR Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 422 OTHER MINN DEPT OF TRANSPO CONSTRUCTION ENG I -35W & OTHER WILSON DEVELOPMENT S ACQUISITION /RELOCATION S OTHER REGISTERED ABSTRACTE REHBEIN /WELL CERTIFICATI Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 471 Amount 25.00 25.00 50.00* 110.40 110.40* 142.05 142.05* 307.45* 8,269.73 8,269.73* 8,269.73* 976.50 4,065.71 161.70 53.90 1,154.11 6,411.92* 6,411.92* 96.20 96.20 165.02 162.79 4,838.79 4,188.92 9,547.92* 9,547.92* 976.5D 584.32 4,291.78 5,852.60* 5,852.60* 45,443.00 1,937.78 320.00 47,700.78* 47,700.78* • • • Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:23:52 • Department Operator: JAL Page: 7 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount OTHER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER • T.K.D.A. CSAH 8 /14- FEBRUARY Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 472 KRAUS ANDERSON Total for REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER Department RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR TDS METROCOM HARTMANN, KURT PREFERRED ONE COMMUN DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION HAWKINS , INC. ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE MATT PARROTT AND SON XCEL ENERGY VIKING ELECTRIC SUPP SMITH MICRO TECHNOLO T.K.D.A. BD SUPPLY WATERWORKS HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS A.J. MACHINERY COMPA Total for LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY 1149 HUDSON TRAIL /REIMS HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY CHLORINE CYLINDER GROUP INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PRINTING UTILITY BILLS MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY T -STRIP WARRANTY WATER EMERGENCY 6 CONSER COPPERHORN /SWIVEL COUPLERS BENDING ATACHMENT /BENDIN Department 494 Total for Fund 601 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMUN HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS MATT PARROTT AND SON PRINTING UTILITY BILLS XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY SMITH MICRO TECHNOLO WARRANTY NORTH STAR PUMP SERV STAGECOACH LIFT STATION A.J. MACHINERY COMPA BENDING ATACBMENT /BENDIN OLSON SEWER SERVICE, PUMP STAGECOACH LIFT STA Total for Department 495 Total for Fund 602 KRAUS ANDERSON CARLSON, TOM M. HARTMANN, KURT NADEAU, PIERRE E NOR PITZEN, DAVID & KATE RON BIRCH CUSTOM BUT REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER 2004 64TE ST /REIMS BLDG 1149 HUDSON TRAIL /REIMS 6651 20TH AVE N /REIMB BL 102 CENTURY TRAIL /REIMS 2396 65TH /REIMH BLDG ESC -15- 161.70 161.7D* 161.70* - 149.89 - 149.89* 11.41 120.18 -50.OD 1,206.10 101.44 68.27 15.00 33.57 26.96 417.53 1,512.81 56.72 65.61 588.26 4,178.01 6,047.06 112.69 14,511.62* 14,361.73* 11.38 853.91 69.22 33.58 26.98 417.54 907.74 65.61 300.00 112.69 487.50 3,286.15* 3,286.15* 400.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 Date: 03/30/2007 Time: 11:23:52 Department Operator: JAL Page: 8 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount TOM LACASSE BUILDERS BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, SHARPER HOMES, INC. QUALITY CHECKED CONS T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.R.D.A. T.R.D.A. T.K.D.A. 6609 24TH AVE /REIMS BLDG 1,500.00 TOW //92 PONTIAC GRAND AM 116.83 LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS /FEBR 20.00 6446 STELLA CIRCLE /REIMS 500.00 6565 24TH AVE N /REIMB BL 500.00 APOLLO LANDING HOTEL /FEB 195.68 COX ESTATES /FEBRUARY 378.81 GRA1DVIEW /FEBRUARY 1,331.42 HOLIDAY STATION STORE /FE 2,246.32 MOON MARSH /FEBRUARY 920.09 PINE GLEN 2 /FEBRUARY 2,118.46 14,727.61* 14,727.61* Total for Department Total for Fund B01 Grand Total 257,138.25* • 41) AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Julie Bartell, City Clerk DATE: April 9, 2007 TOPIC: Approve First Reading of Ordinance No. 03 -07, Adding a new Chapter 615 to the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances relating to Special Event Permits VOTES REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: The City receives requests from individuals and organizations to conduct outdoor special events within the city. An example of a special event would be a parade, carnival, fair or outdoor concert. These events often require city assistance or review in order to ensure that public safety standards are met and city liability is addressed. The City has been issuing special event permits, using an application that allows staff to gather the necessary information to preview the events and place conditions on issuance of a permit. However, there hasn't been any language in the City Code specific to special events. Having an ordinance regulating special events in the code would make city regulations more clear and the permit process and the inclusion of conditions with permits more justifiable. Using model language prepared by the League of Minnesota Cities and surveying special event language used by other cities, staff has drafted a special events ordinance. The police, fire and public service departments and the city attorney have reviewed and provided input for the proposed ordinance. The ordinance predominantly puts into the code the special event process the city has been using but also includes the following: - defines the size of a special event (50 or more persons); - establishes an application period (45 days prior to event); - exempts non - profits from paying the application fee ($50) but not from paying city incurred costs; - reference to the state fire code in its current or future form; - language that will allow notification of residents /businesses as a condition, if warranted; - excepts city and county parks; - adds language allowing for permit denial; - adds indemnification language; - acknowledgment that permitted events are subject to all other applicable federal, state or local laws. The Council will continue to receive special event requests and maintains the authority to grant permits. OPTIONS 1. Approve the First Reading of Ordinance 03 -07 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Option 1. i • • • • • • 151 Reading: Published: 2n6 Reading: Effective: To County Recorder Council Member moved for adoption of the following ordinance: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 03 -07 AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 615 RELATED TO SPECIAL EVENTS The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes do ordain as follows: Section 1. That the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances be amended by adding thereto a new Chapter 615 to read as follows: CHAPTER 615. SPECIAL EVENTS 615.01 Purpose and Findings. The purpose of this chapter is to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of this city by regulating the time, place and manner of conduct of special events and by establishing permit requirements for conducting special events such as are herein defined. The City Council finds that special events often exceed the city's capacity to provide usual city services. These city services include, but are not limited to sanitary, fire, police and utility services. The City Council also finds these regulations necessary to ensure that such events are conducted with sufficient consideration given to public safety issues, including, among other things, the impact of these events on parking and vehicular traffic within the city. 615.02 Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. Person: A natural person, association, organization, club, group formed for a common purpose, partnership of any kind, limited liability company, corporation or any other legal entity. Special Event: An outdoor gathering of at least 50 individuals whether on public or private property, assembled with a common purpose for a period of one hour or longer. Special Events include, but are not limited to concerts, fairs, carnivals, circuses, parades, flea markets, marathons, walkathons, festivals, races, bicycle events, celebrations, or any other gathering or events of similar nature. Special Events do not include noncommercial events held on private property such as graduation parties or social parties. 615.03 Permit Required. No person shall hold, conduct or participate in a special event within the city unless a permit has been issued for such event upon timely written application made to the city. 615.04 Application for Permit. In addition to the general licensing application requirements included in Section 601.02, each written application for a special event permit must be made at least 45 days in advance of the event's proposed date in a form prescribed by the City Council. This application period shall not begin to run until a complete application has been filed with the city. Application forms shall be made available in the office of the city clerk. A fee, in the amount specified in the Ordinance Establishing Fees and Charges, shall be paid to the city along with the completed application form. In addition to the fee, the applicant shall pay all additional costs incurred by the city as a direct result of the special event. Nonprofit entities, as defined as 501(c) or (d) by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended, shall be exempt from payment of the permit application fee but not from city incurred costs. Failure to provide a complete application or to pay the fee, as herein required, is sufficient reason to deny the special event permit. 615.05 Issuance of Permit, Conditions and Posting. (A) Special event permits will be issued upon City Council approval. The Council may attach reasonable conditions to the permit as are deemed necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare. Such conditions may pertain to any of the following: (1) Location and hours during which the event may be held; (2) Sanitation /availability of potable water; (3) Security /crowd management; (4) Parking and traffic issues; (5) Emergency and medical services; (6) Clean -up of premises and surrounding area /trash disposal; (7) Insurance; (8) Lighting; (9) Fire service /safety, including meeting all requirements of the State Fire Code, as it may be amended from time to time (10) Temporary construction, barricades /fencing; (11) Removal of advertising /promotional materials; (12) Noise levels; (13) Alcohol consumption; (14) Notification of residents or businesses; (15 ) Any other conditions which the Council deems necessary. 615.06 Exceptions to the Permit. The permit requirement contained in this chapter does not apply to the following: (A) Special events sponsored and managed by the city; (B) Funerals and funeral processions; (C) The grounds of any school, playground, city or county park, place of worship, hotel conference center, stadium, athletic field, arena, auditorium or similar place of assembly when used for regularly established assembly purposes. 615.07 Denial of Application A permit may be denied based upon a determination that: (A) The event would seriously endanger public safety; (B) The event would unreasonably inconvenience the general public; (C) The event would unreasonably infringe upon the rights of abutting properties; (D) The event would conflict with another proximate event or interfere with construction or maintenance work; (E) There are not sufficient safety personnel or other necessary staff to accommodate the event; (F) Other issues in the public interest were identified by the city council. 615.08 Penalty (A) Any person who violates any condition of a special event permit or any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable as prescribed by Minnesota State Law. (B) Enforcement of this division may, at the Council's discretion, take any of the following forms: (1) Citation /criminal prosecution; (2) Injunctions, declaratory judgments or other civil remedies; (3) Permit revocation; (4) Disbursement of persons gathered. 615.08 Indemnification Permit holder agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers and employees harmless from any liability, claim, damages, costs, judgments, or expenses, including attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from an act or omission including, without limitation, professional errors and omissions of event promoter, its agents, employees, arising out of or by any reason of the conduct of the activity authorized by such permit and against all loss caused in any way be reason of the failure of the event promoter to fully perform all obligations under this section. 615.09 Applicability The provisions of this chapter and of all regulations made thereunder and all permits issued thereunder shall be subject to all applicable and controlling provisions of federal, state and city laws and of regulations and orders issued thereunder. 2.0c- John Bergeson, Mayor Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • AGENDA ITEM 3 B STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 9 April 2007 SUBJECT City of Lino Lakes and LELS. VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 BACKGROUND The City and L.E.L.S (police officers) have come to a tentative agreement on a two -year (2007 & 2008) contract. Modifications to the contract include $20.00 increases in the uniform allowance and the addition of court time cancellation pay. Wages increase by 3% each year, with a 1.5% market increase for 2007. OPTIONS 1. Approve the proposed contract for 2007 — 2008 2. Return to the negotiation table. RECOMMENDATION Number One. • AGENDA ITEM 3 C STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 9 April 2007 SUBJECT Resignation VOTE REQUIRED 3/5 BACKGROUND Officer Joel Martin has tendered his resignation from the Lino Lakes Police Department. We wish Joel the best of luck as he continues his career in law enforcement. OPTIONS 1. Accept Officer Martin's resignation. • RECOMMENDATION Number One. r STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE TOPIC VOTES REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 4A David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director April 9, 2007 FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 02 -07 Repealing Chapter 807 of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances and adding a new Chapter 807 relating to the Operation of Snowmobiles and All Terrain Vehicles 3/5 The purpose of the amendment to Chapter 807 is to include: • The definition and operation of all- terrain vehicles within the corporate city limits 807.01 definitions; • Subdivision 1 and 2 combined to read as follows Subdivision 1. Operation of snowmobiles within the corporate limits of the City of Lino Lakes is permissible only if in conformance with State law and City ordinances. It is unlawful for any person to operate a snowmobile within the corporate limits of the City of Lino Lakes in violation of the following provisions: 807.03 • To modify the times of operation to be consistent with our southern neighbor, the City of Circle Pines. Those changes will be found under; and 807.03 subdivision (2) #11; • Authorized snowmobiles may be used on any public property within the city for rescue, emergency, or law enforcement purposes; 807.03, subdivision 14; • Operation of All- Terrain Vehicles within the corporate city limits — 807.07 (this section is new); • Exemption from provisions: The City's enforcement agency, County Sheriff's Department, DNR, and the Minnesota State Patrol, in order to provide enforcement, shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter; 807.08; • Violation: Penalty: Updated to reflect current state statute — definition of a misdemeanor; 807.09 Deleted from the current chapter is the following: • Use of Snowmobiles on public thoroughfare in an emergency during the period of time when and at locations where snow upon the roadway renders travel by automobile impractical. After the First Reading of Ordinance 02 -07 Chapter 807, the Second Reading would be held on April 23, 2007, and the ordinance would be published in the Legal Newspaper. OPTIONS 1. Approve the First Reading of Ordinance 02 -07 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Option 1. ATTACHMENTS Neighboring communities hours of operation for snowmobiles /recreational vehicles. • • • • • • 1st Reading: Published: 2nd Reading: Effective: To County Recorder Council Member moved for adoption of the following ordinance: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 02 -07 AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY REPEALING THE CURRENT CHAPTER 807 AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 807 ENTITLED OPERATION OF SNOWMOBILES AND ALL- TERRAIN VEHICLES The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. That Chapter 807 of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances be and hereby is repealed. Section 2. That the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances be amended by adding thereto a new Chapter 807 to read as follows: CHAPTER 807 OPERATION OF SNOWMOBILES AND ALL - TERRAIN VEHICLES 807.01: Definitions 807.02: Age Restrictions For Snowmobile Operation 807.03: Operation of Snowmobiles Within the Corporate City Limits 807.04: Road Crossing by Snowmobiles 807.05: Snowmobiles at Uncontrolled Intersections 807.06: Snowmobile Equipment Requirements 807.07: Operation of All- Terrain Vehicles Within the Corporate City Limits 807.08: Exemptions From Provisions 807.09: Violation; Penalty 807.01: DEFINITIONS: Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the words, combinations of words, terms, and phrases as used in this chapter shall have the meanings set forth in this section: ALL- TERRAIN VEHICLE: CLASS I: A motorized flotation -tired vehicle of not less than three (3) low pressure tires, but not more than six (6) low pressure tires, that is limited in engine displacement of less than eight hundred (800) cubic centimeters and total dry weight less than nine hundred (900) pounds. CLASS II: Class 2 all - terrain vehicles means an all- terrain vehicle that has a total dry weight of 900 to 1,500 pounds. ORV: ATV's over 1,500 pounds are still considered ORV' s. BOULEVARD: The strip of land, usually made of grass, between a roadway and a sidewalk or pedestrian walking path. OPERATE: To ride in or on, and control the operation of, a snowmobile or all- terrain vehicle. OPERATOR: Every person who operates, or is in actual physical control of a snowmobile or all- terrain vehicle. OWNER: A person, other than a lien holder, having the property in or title to snowmobiles or all- terrain vehicles, and entitled to the use or possession thereof. PERSON: An individual, partnership, corporation, the state and its agencies and its subdivisions, and any body of persons, whether incorporated or not. RIGHT -OF -WAY: The entire strip of land traversed by a highway or street in which the public owns the fee or an easement for roadway purposes. ROADWAY: That portion of a highway improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel, including the shoulder, but not including the boulevard. SAFETY OR A device which, when pressure is removed from the engine DEADMAN accelerator or throttle, causes the motor to be disengaged THROTTLE: from the driving track. SNOWMOBILE: Any self - propelled vehicle used for recreational purposes, steered by skis or runners, and designed for travel on snow, ice, or natural terrain. STREET OR The entire width between boundary lines of any way or place HIGHWAY: when any part thereof is open to the use of the public, as a matter or right, for the purposes of vehicular traffic. 807.02: AGE RESTRICTIONS FOR SNOWMOBILE OPERATION: A. Age Restrictions: No person under fourteen (14) years of age shall operate on streets or highways, or make a direct crossing of a street or highway, as the operator of a snowmobile. A person fourteen (14) years of age or older, but less than eighteen (18) years of age, may operate a snowmobile on streets or highways as permitted under this chapter, and make a direct crossing thereof, only if he /she has in their immediate possession a valid snowmobile safety certificate issued by the Commissioner of Natural Resources, as provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 84.86, as amended. B. Responsibility Of Snowmobile Owner: It is unlawful for the owner of a snowmobile to permit the snowmobile to be operated contrary to the provisions of this section. • • 807.03: OPERATION OF SNOWMOBILES WITHIN THE CORPORATE CITY LIMITS: Subdivision 1. Operation of snowmobiles within the corporate limits of the City of Lino Lakes is permissible only if in conformance with State law and City ordinances. It is unlawful for any person to operate a snowmobile within the corporate limits of the City of Lino Lakes in violation of the following provisions: 1. Anywhere within any public right -of -way except on the roadway surface or as otherwise provided in this chapter. 2. On a public sidewalk or walkway provided or used for pedestrian travel. 3. On private property of another without lawful authority or consent of the owner or occupant. 4. On any publicly owned lands and frozen waters (lakes, rivers, streams and ponds), not previously listed or authorized for such use by the proper public authority, including, but not limited to, school grounds, park property, playgrounds, recreation areas and golf courses. Use in those areas previously listed or authorized for such use by the proper public authority shall be lawful, and snowmobiles may be driven in and out of such areas only by the shortest route possible. Authorized areas in the City of Lino Lakes owned by the City shall be designated by City Council resolution. 5. At any place while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or controlled substance. 6. At any speed in excess of fifteen (15) miles per hour on a public street or highway, or anywhere at a rate of speed greater than reasonable or proper under all the surrounding circumstances. 7. At any place in a careless, reckless, or negligent manner, so as to endanger the person or property of another, or to cause injury or damage thereto. 8. So as to tow any person or thing on a public street or highway, except through use of a rigid tow bar attached to the rear of the snowmobile. 9. At a speed greater than fifteen (15) miles per hour when within one hundred feet (100') of any riverbank or lakeshore; or within one hundred feet (100') of fishermen, icehouses, or skating rinks; nor shall operation be permitted within one hundred feet (100') of any sliding area; nor where the operation would conflict with the lawful use of property, or would endanger other persons or property. 10. In a manner so as to create loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise, which disturbs, • annoys, or interferes with the peace and quiet of another. 11. Snowmobiling shall be prohibited after ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and before seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. Sunday through Thursday, and between twelve o'clock (12:00) A.M. and eight o'clock (8:00) A.M. Friday and Saturday. This provision is not intended to prohibit snowmobiles from entering or leaving the City of Lino Lakes during the above hours, provided that the operator of a snowmobile utilizes the most direct route of travel to and from the operator's residence or destination. 12. Every person leaving a snowmobile in a public place shall lock the ignition, remove the key and take the same with said person. 13. It is unlawful to intentionally drive, chase, run over, kill or otherwise take or attempt to take any animal, wild or domestic, with a snowmobile. 14. Authorized snowmobiles may be used on any public property within the city for rescue, emergency, or law enforcement purposes. 807.04: ROAD CROSSING BY SNOWMOBILES: A snowmobile may make a direct crossing of a street or highway, provided: 1. The crossing is made at an angle of approximately ninety degrees (90 °) to the direction of the street or highway, and at a place where no obstruction prevents a quick and safe crossing. 2. The snowmobile is brought to a complete stop before crossing the shoulder or main traveled way of the highway. 3. The driver yields the right of way to all oncoming traffic, which constitutes an immediate hazard. 4. In crossing a divided street or highway, the crossing is made only at an intersection of such street or highway with another public street or highway. 5. If the crossing is made between the hours of one -half (1/2) hour after sunset to one -half (1/2) hour before sunrise or, in conditions of reduced visibility, only if both front and rear lights are on. 807.05: SNOWMOBILES AT UNCONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS: Subdivision 1. No snowmobile shall enter any controlled intersection without making a complete stop. The operator shall then yield the right -of- way to any vehicles or pedestrians that constitute any immediate hazard. Subdivision 2. An uncontrolled intersection includes, but is not limited to, roadways, streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths designed for pedestrian traffic. • • • 807.06: SNOWMOBILE EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS: Subdivision 1. It is unlawful for any person to operate a snowmobile any place within the corporate limits of Lino Lakes unless it is equipped with the equipment set forth as follows: 1. Muffler; Cutout, Bypass: Standard mufflers which are properly attached and in constant operation, and which reduce the noise of operation of the motor to the minimum necessary for operation. No person shall use a muffler cutout, bypass, straight pipe or similar device on a snowmobile motor, and the exhaust system shall not emit or produce a sharp popping or crackling noise. 2. Brakes: Brakes adequate to control the movement of, and to stop and hold, the snowmobile under any conditions of operation. 3. Safety Throttle: A safety or so- called "deadman" throttle in operating condition so that when pressure is removed from the accelerator or throttle, the motor is disengaged from the driving track. 4. Lights: At least one clear lamp attached to the front, with sufficient intensity to reveal persons and vehicles at a distance of at least one hundred feet (100') ahead during the hours of darkness under normal atmospheric conditions. a. Such headlamp shall be so aimed that glaring rays are not projected into the eyes of an oncoming vehicle operator. b. It shall be equipped with at least one red tail lamp having a minimum candlepower of sufficient intensity to exhibit a red light plainly visible from a distance of five hundred feet (500') to the rear during the hours of darkness under normal atmospheric conditions. c. Such equipment shall be in use when the vehicle is operated between the hours of one -half (1/2) hour after sunset, or one -half (1/2) hour before sunrise, or at times of reduced visibility. 807.07: OPERATION OF ALL- TERRAIN VEHICLES WITHIN THE CORPORATE CITY LIMITS: Subdivision 1. No person shall enter and operate an all- terrain vehicle on lands not owned by the person, except where otherwise allowed by law, without the express written or oral permission of the owner, occupant, or lessee of such lands. Subdivision 2. Except as otherwise specifically permitted and authorized, it is unlawful for any person to operate an all- terrain vehicle within the corporate limits of the City of Lino Lakes in violation of the following provisions: 1. No person shall enter and operate an all- terrain vehicle on any roadway, street or highway within the corporate city limits of Lino Lakes. 2. No person shall enter and operate an all- terrain vehicle upon any bank or slope of any street or highway ditch within the corporate limits of the City of Lino Lakes. 3. On a public sidewalk or walkway provided or used for pedestrian travel. 4. At any place while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or controlled substance. 5. On any publicly owned lands and frozen waters (lakes, rivers, streams and ponds), not previously listed or authorized for such use by the proper public authority, including, but not limited to, school grounds, park property, playgrounds, recreation areas and golf courses. Use in those areas previously listed or authorized for such use by the proper public authority shall be lawful, and all- terrain vehicles may be driven in and out of such areas only by the shortest route possible. Authorized areas in the City of Lino Lakes owned by the City shall be designated by City Council resolution. 6. All- terrain vehicle operation shall be prohibited after ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and before seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. Sunday through Thursday, and between twelve o'clock (12:00) A.M. and eight o'clock (8:00) A.M. Friday and Saturday. 7. It is unlawful to intentionally drive, chase, run over, kill or otherwise take or attempt to take any animal, wild or domestic, with an all- terrain vehicle. 8. In a manner so as to create loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise, which disturbs, annoys, or interferes with the peace and quiet of another. 9. At a speed greater than fifteen (15) miles per hour when within one hundred feet (100') of any riverbank or lakeshore; or within one hundred feet (100') of fishermen, icehouses, or skating rinks; nor shall operation be permitted within one hundred feet (100') of any sliding area; nor where the operation would conflict with the lawful use of property, or would endanger other persons or property. 10. At any place in a careless, reckless, or negligent manner, so as to endanger the person or property of another, or to cause injury or damage thereto. 11. Authorized all- terrain vehicles may be used on any public property within the city for rescue, emergency, or law enforcement purposes. 807.08: EXEMPTIONS FROM PROVISIONS: The City's enforcement agency, the County Sheriffs Department, DNR, and the Minnesota State Patrol in order to provide enforcement, shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter. 807.09 VIOLATION; PENALTY: Any person violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment of not more than ninety (90) days, a fine of not more than $1,000.00, or both, plus the costs of prosecution in either case. • • • t • Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member _ and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • • 12:00 am - 7:00 am >- H 0 v) (0 3 T Y c3 • c Q a) >'~ C c -a c a) E •n i a) O (n -c 0) U C O T O O. E c -0 (o fl_ O) L O C O ° C � O O U D Ali WQ cooai u) (0 c(a ((0 (E0 O O O O O O O N 66 Q CO Q (0 O r O O O O O O O N O r r r r a) a) a) C C (0 a) m Circle Pines 12:00 am - 7:00 am 1:30 am - 7:00 am 1:30 am - 7:00 am > (0 0 L a) >- L co a) I— Z >. • (.0 N 0 > a) a) • ca �X ( LE Forest Lake • • r STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 6A Michael Grochala April 9, 2007 Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -51 Approving Joint Powers Agreement with Anoka County for Construction - Lake Drive /135W Interchange Simple Majority In addition to previous funding for preliminary and final design, Anoka County has committed to $3,700,000 for the reconstruction of the Lake Drive Interchange. The Joint Powers Agreement with Exhibit A provides for the funding in accordance with the terms set forth in the agreement. Anoka County's total participation in the project, including design, is $4,069,148.00 With the execution of the agreement, all the agency funding will be in place for the project. The total estimated project cost, including engineering, land acquisition and contingency is $10,349,000. Funding for the project is as follows: City of Lino Lakes Anoka County State of Minnesota $5,303,842 $4,069,148 $ 976,000 Letting for the project is currently scheduled for April 26. Construction is anticipated to start in mid May. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the JPA with Anoka County. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 07 -51 2. Joint Powers Agreement (Including Exhibit A) Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 07 -51 RESOLUTION APPROVING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ANOKA LAKE DRIVE/I -35W INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, authorizes political subdivisions to enter into Joint Powers Agreements, and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes and the County of Anoka agree that it is in the best interest of the traveling public to reconstruct the interchange of I -35W and County State Aid Highway 23 (Lake Drive) as soon as possible; WHEREAS, said parties mutually agree that the interchange at I -35W and County State Aid Highway 23 (Lake Drive) is in need of reconstruction; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said the final design study be shared, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the City Council hereby approves the Joint Powers Agreement with the County of Anoka for the Reconstruction of the Interchange of County State Aid Highway 23 (Lake Drive) and I -35W and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement on behalf of the City. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of April, 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • Anoka County Contract No. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 23 (LAKE DRIVE) AND I- 35W INTERCHANGE COUNTY PROJECT NO. S.A.P. 02- 623 -13 CITY PROJECT NO. S.A.P. 210 - 020-04 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 2007, by and between the County of Anoka, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as "County ", and the City of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014, hereinafter referred to as the "City ". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement agree it is in the best interest of the traveling public to reconstruct the Interchange of I -35W and County State Aid Highway 23 (Lake Drive); and, • WHEREAS, said parties mutually agree that the interchange at I -35W and County State Aid Highway 23 (Lake Drive) is in need of reconstruction; and, WHEREAS, Anoka County has jurisdiction over County State Aid Highway 23 (Lake Drive.); and, WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has jurisdiction over I -35W; and, WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a separate •agreement for interchange study, preliminary design and project memorandum (Anoka County Contract No. 2005 -0528) and final design and right of way acquisition (Anoka County Contract No. 2005-0537); and, WHEREAS, the parties have entered into agreement No. 90500M with MnDOT for signal maintenance at the I -35W ramp termini; and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said reconstruction be shared; and, WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 471.59 authorizes political subdivisions of the state to enter into joint powers agreements for the joint exercise of powers common to each. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY STIPULATED AND AGREED: I. PURPOSE • The parties have joined together for the purpose of the reconstruction of the interchange of I -3 5 W and County State Aid Highway 23 (Lake Drive) including the bridge over I -3 5 W, herein known as the Project The County project number for the reconstruction is S.A.P. 02 -623- 13. The City Project No. is S.A.P. 210 - 020 -04. Said engineering plans will be filed in the office of the Anoka County Highway Department and incorporated herein by reference. IL METHOD A. Construction The City shall provide all construction- engineering services and shall cause the construction of the Project in conformance with said plans and specifications. The City shall do the calling for all bids and the acceptance of all bid proposals. III. COSTS A. The contract cost of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, normal engineering costs and equipment rental required to complete the work shall constitute the actual "construction costs" and shall be so referred to herein. "Estimated costs" are good faith projections of costs which will be incurred for the Project. Actual costs may vary from the estimated costs and actual costs are what the parties are responsible for. B. Participation in the cost of construction is as follows: 1. The County shall pay for the following items up to a total capped amount of $3,700,000: • Twenty -five percent (25 %) of signal systems A, B, C, and D • One hundred percent (100 %) of traffic control interconnect • One hundred percent (100 %) of Bridge No 02817 2. The City shall pay for all remaining items including the cost of the items shown above in excess of $3,700,000. 3. The City shall pay for all construction engineering costs of the project. C. The estimated construction costs for the Project is shown in the attached Exhibit A. D. Upon award of the contract, the County shall pay to the City, upon written demand by the City, ninety -five percent (95 %) of its portion of the construction cost estimated at $3,515,000.00. 2 • • • E. Upon final completion of the Project, the County's share of the construction cost will be based upon actual construction costs. The remaining five percent (5 %) of the County's portion of the construction costs shall be paid up to a total County contribution of $3,700,000.00. IV. TERM This Agreement shall continue until terminated as provided hereinafter. V. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be disbursed by each entity pursuant to the method provided by law. VI. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES All contracts let and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by the City and County in conformance to the State laws. VII. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and shall be made upon request by either party. VIII. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, with or without cause, upon not less than thirty (30) days written notice delivered by mail or in person to the other party. If notice is delivered by mail, it shall be deemed to be received two days after mailing. Such termination shall not be effective with respect to any solicitation of bids or any purchases of services or goods, which occurred prior to such notice of termination. The County shall pay its pro rata share of costs, which the City incurred prior to such notice of termination. IX. SIGNALIZATION POWER The City shall at their sole expense, install or cause the installation of an adequate electrical power source to the service cabinets for Signal Systems A, B, C, and D, including any necessary extension of power lines. The City shall be the lead agency in this matter. Upon completion of said traffic control signal installation, the ongoing cost of the electrical power to the signal shall be the sole cost and expense of the City. X. MAINTENANCE A. Maintenance of the completed watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, detention basins (including ponds and their outlet structures and grit chambers /collectors) shall be the sole obligation of the City. B. Maintenance of all trails and sidewalks, including snow plowing, shall be the sole responsibility of the City. C. Maintenance of streetlights and cost of electrical power to the streetlights shall be the sole obligation of the City. D. Maintenance of the completed signal and signal equipment shall be per MnDOT agreement 90500M and the following:. E. The County shall maintain the traffic signal controller, traffic signal and pedestrian indications, loop detectors and associated wiring of the said traffic control signal at the sole obligation of the County. F. Painting of the traffic signal shall be the sole obligation of the County. Any variation of painting color standards will be billed to the City. G. Timing of the traffic signal shall be determined by the County. H. Only the County shall have access to the controller cabinet. I. The traffic control signal shall be the property of the County. J. The City shall be responsible for maintenance of the luminaries, hrminaire relamping, and himinaire painting. K. All maintenance of the EVP System shall be completed by the County. The City shall be billed by the County on a quarterly basis for all incurred costs for maintenance of EVP system on signal systems A and D. L. EVP Emitter Units may be installed on and used only by Emergency Vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 169.01, Subdivision 5, and § 169.03. The City shall provide a list to the County Engineer, or the County's duly appointed representative, of all such vehicles with emitter units on an annual basis. County. M. Malfunctions of the EVP System shall be immediately reported to the N. All timing of said EVP System shall be determined by the County. O. In the event said EVP System or components are, in the opinion of the County, being misused, or the conditions set forth are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City, written notice thereof from the County, the County shall remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector receiver, infrared detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components shall become the property of the County. 4 • • • IX. NOTICE For purposes of delivery of any notices herein, the notice shall be effective if delivered to the County Administrator of Anoka County, 2100 Third Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, on behalf of the County, and to the City Administrator of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Pkwy, Lino Lakes, MN 55014, on behalf of the City. X. INDEMNIFICATION The City and County mutually agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of the respective officers, agents, or employees relating to activities conducted by either party under this Agreement. XI. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect between the parties to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations, or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below. COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES By: By: Dennis D. Berg, Chair County Board of Commissioners John Bergeson Mayor Dated: Dated: ATTEST By: By: Terry L. Johnson Gordon Heitke County Administrator City Administrator Dated: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: Dated: By: Douglas W. Fischer, P.E. Michael Grochala County Engineer Community Development Director Dated: Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: By: Dan Klint Assistant County Attorney Its: City Attorney Dated: Dated: 6 • • STORM ❑ W H � W coUNTY 92423.13 ESTIMATED COST ❑ H r�r .�Z Fj W � z:N ESTIMATED C08T 11:11:111111121:11111211111111 111111111111: 895 1 $1,790 3270 1 36,540 201111111 iA,Vw 33822 3118,377 11640 548,560 15938 3111,566 nen 3 $900 850 3850 1134 328,940 84 125,800 2 512.000 en nen 1111 O d ESTIMATED QUANTITY TOTAL ESTIMATED C09T 1:11:1111: 118,286 372,539 W M TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY 1111111111111: 45 450 2890 73084 103770 1 33822 11540 15938 5488 3 850 1134 84 2 UNIT UNIT PRICE LUMP SUM 530,000 EACH 510.000 ACRE 31,500 TREE 3100 ACRE 31,700 TREE 8100 t 7 N $3,000.00 $410.00 950.00 350.00 250.00 200.00 300.00 120.00 820.00 :IeF iDU.UU $300.00 {800.00 5550.00 5875.00 LUMP SUM EACH EACH LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT .LLLL :H � J LIN FT LIN FT SO FT m m . EACH EACH EACH EACH EACH EACH EACH W LIN FT U QQ 3 W EACH EACH EACH LUMP SUM CUYD CUYD CUYD CUYD CU YD so yo GALLON 1 TUN TON CU YD POUND SO FT LIN FT EACH U Q EACH EACH ITEM MOBILIZAc IONNaG nr OC go CLEARING GRUBBING rest minim., ii l 9 z o Lis °r BUILDING REMOVAL A !BUILDING REMOVAL B DISCONNECT SEWER SERVICE DISCONNECT WATER SERVICE REMOVE CONCRETE FLUME GRANT CURB REMOVEINTE REMOVE BITUMINOUS CURB GTTE REMOVEC Inn AND U R REMOVE METAL CULVERT CE REMOVE CHAIN LINK FEN REMOVE GUARD RAIL- PLATE BEAM MORED neDl C ,REMOVE AR REMOVE WATER SERVICE PIPE REMOVE CONDUIT WALK REMOVE CONCRETE REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ['MICA/MIT REMOVE PAVE REMOVE SEPTIC TANK REMOVE LIGHTING UNIT REMOVE EQUIPMENT FAD (REMOVE HANDHOLE !REMOVE LIGHT STANDARD BASE ,REMOVE DELINEATOR Anewwrwle Ufa) IMO ew, nnl.InaeTC DAVCIUGAIT ICI 111 nFPT1-11 1 i E C A u „ ° u SALVAGE SIGN TYPE SPECIAL ISALVAGE SERVICE CABINET ABANDON WELL (HAUL SALVAGED MATERIAL COMMON EXCAVATION SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 1:;3 I 5 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING (CV) CLASS 5 ee,,nne wnnonenu Dewln a I BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (4,F) N WEAR COURCC MIX IA C) TYPE SP 12.b NO STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (3Y48) REINFORCEMENT BARS MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL 0, 6 PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT I I i 1 > j � > N l UU C W a ? ° ° ? m 18" RC PIPE APRON 24" RC PIPE APRON PJ9 m 0 N hm8 0000 N vi ri N N vi N T; � 0000000000000 N G N « N N H h �vev�ve N N b 88,8862 N N N N 74-.; <v N h HNNb0 v 00000000 N N HN2 ' <e< NNNN 088 "met N N N N -" 00 N N Jfl a'ryry bb ai 000 N N v1 i N 22 [ b � o N 828 bmm N N N N 74 ^ „ � - N N N 74 N N N N co �.nw,i.nn,n.,.1....L.v ..1... n.h. n A. aMAI ClIcARennd\FrhIh11 A An C 0 0 11 et m ep C L O �o m c1 N •1:1 M W L. w �m W N m O 07 a— G y J_ eh N t g O ~ m m m mH: 5 , 50 1e e0 511;88 ,0,. m ymgmQ m mp m y no ESTIMATED QUANTITY - m m m m O 0 m N^ ^ f f'A^ ^ ^< . .m-mf COUNTY 12.623 -13 ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY INO LAKES 10 -020 -04 ESTIMATED C08T {m N 5 sm. m mbm 50 40 50 m N CmNmbNmmmCm° t °m t ^N ^ ^ m m I M ti Nn0mm m g m m mHO o gm m oo C t1- I m a N NO ^ ^^ ^ ^OON N N ^-N 340 14 2 28438 802 4270 5714 078 184 1800 400 0 Omm m a TOTAL ESTIMATED COST N M N M M N ° N N1NN 0 N NMm _ 5 524,045 511,580 n$ ° ° m <O m 11,400.... < N7 Y mmmm° m mo ° m ° ° mmomo m m ^mmmm o m m oN o ommmoo 0 vW M 0 o o m mNmmmmm°S N N m m m TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY ^ 2 25 m P P O O Om9 mm� . ^^ < .- ^ ^ ^ ^N�mf m < ^° m m ^N " "._,_100 m^ N mA<� ^ N < ^ „n ^ ^^ m m m V V OO^ m m^ m . m m m m O O tml. ^ m ^^ ^•- UNIT PRICE o N ° ° ° m m 0 °0 2 25.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 540.00 m o d 460.00 40.00 550.00 o o m m • 510.00 53,850.00 5800.00 32.000.00 560.00 g g 5 •°o,m ° °mg d N 5250.00 330.00 5400.00 do 1 g omo o oo m 10.00 10.00 10.00 545,00 o 0 mmm o 1. ° o°° ° I 2,500.00 $1.000.00 52,000.00 ~ L EACH LLV. U UU Q EACH UN FT Il UN FT UN FT LIN FT UN FT LIN FT LIN FT UN FT EACH QU a aU QU aU ¢ ¢U Z 2 E EACH EACH EACH QU QUQ ¢ ¢U aU QU Q EACH J UN FT UN FT � Y LIN FT SQ YD LIN FT LIN FT , UN FT QU ¢U V EACH CU YD CU YD 5Q YD V. L F UN FT UN FT LIN FT UN FT LLaaU Q QaU E EACH EACH t m ITEM 30" RC PIPE APRON 15" RC PIPE CULVERT DES 3008 CL V 18" RC PIPE CULVERT DES 3008 CL V Il 4" PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL 4" TP PIPE DRAIN PERF TP PIPE DRAIN 4 12" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3008 CL V 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3008 CL V 21" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III 30" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3008 CL III IN T OEXI8TINGDRAINAGEBTRUCTURF CONNECT CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 4" PIPE PLUG "PLUG B IPE P SEWER RISER CONSTRUCT 6" INSIDE DROP 4" PVC SANITARY SERVIVE PIPE 8" PVC SANITARY SERVIVE PIPE DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN HYDRANT 8" PIPE PLUG 1" CORPORATION STOP 2" CORPORATION STOP 10 "X6" WET TAP 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX 1" CURB STOP & BOX 2" CURB STOP 8 BOX 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE 2" TYPE K COPPER PIPE 8" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CI. 52 8" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 12" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 ENE mein LATION ICTURE DESIGN F ICTURE DESIGN O ICUTURE DESIGN 72 -4020 ICTURE DESIGN SPEC 1 ICTURE DESIGN SPEC 2 CASTING ASSEMBLY RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS II RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE IV 4" CONCRETE WALK 8 "CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 0410 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8424 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8818 MES TRUNCATED DO PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DESIGN 8337 RELOCATE PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DES 8337 N METAWCCONDUIT I coro.a.0 31NCH ON 2545.523 2 INCH NONMETALLIC CONDUIT 0 2545.531 (UNDERGROUND WIRE, 1 CONDUCTOR NO. 31 2545.533 ARMORED CABLE. 4 CONDUCTOR NO, 4 aE 2546.553 HANDH 2545.802 SERVICE EQUIPMENT VICE 2545.82 ELECTRICSER 2545.602 IIP T LLSERVICECABINET g U w 8 POLYSTYR CONST DRAINAGE STR CONST DRAINAGE STR CONST DRAINAGE STR CONST DRAINAGE STRU DRAINAGE STR -32- • 0 6. V f 6 O 0 m 0 <0 20 PO 0 O n et rj W Q COUNTY 2423-13 ESTIMATED COST( 09 91 9Z1' 04 002 06 00t 10 0 mn M. MN ESTIMATED I QUANTITY NNNN Doom '•o ON INO LAKES I0. 020.04 ESTIMATED COST( MN 11° C' ' M Om Nm WO H_ ' 111111'''m Np 0 NMN - S W mp sNob. 8 0 MMN m - MM m M II $720 ESTIMATED QUANTITY 'NOOON r 011 001 BE l.1 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.0 1.0 D ^1`NNm�m �'' 250 883 0 <� WAN <00A TOTAL ESTIMATED COST O Mpry om N1NN 0 N H M 0000 o M W � N� NIMNNM Nm m m 11n Om 2 O N N W1n NNMNMM pp O mm O m N 0{10 W Omm NNM 000 Et 000 99 001 191 009 091 pm.," ...to.-‘ .... MMMM m 0 u' NmmmOi m Vt7.1D NNMN1M1i 0`� p m 10i ;5,280 $4,455 $3,808 ;7,858 NNO O .0,-- NNNN MM m E00.000 G M W N< ...gm.. os M W W W TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY N.-,0N f o O '- oo ,0.N N 411 254 25 5 N NrWW NNm 12 51 173 250 883 9758 43 135 q mop W�NP0 • • UNIT PRICE ;18.00 300.00 2 000.00 S 1 800 00 O o mo . o - N O 0,1j�01y .MNNN M 0 p 00'029 00'9ZZ9 $? DO00m0 M' o0 • o 8 00000 00 NO.- 001mm ...o.' 180 800.00 ;181 700.00 85 000.00 ;12 800.00 8 400.00 96.000.09 00 mN A-W SON 9385.00 9495.00 8550 00 275.00 r 8385.00 C O o pmmN MN 95.50 2.00 2.75 3.00 200.00 5.00 p O^? OmNO< N NMMM o W o g MN LIN FT EACH EACH EACH EACH ceru g m U ¢Q j =7 i UDAY SQ FT tU NQQQW =V i =U % W m ON SIG SYS SIG SYS LUMP SUM I I1MP SUM I p A inn I-1J LUMP SUM SYSTEM TREE TREE Tocc TREE SHRUB PLANT e Li. L rVr Q7 JJ_W UN FT ACRE POUND POUND POUND SQ Y. TON TON erac oo?o . WNa 1 POUND CU YD CU YD CU YD POUND l POUND 1 POUND 0 u 0 W¢ EACH EACH EACH EACH EACH TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN 08338 4NCHORAGE ASSEMBLY - PLATE BEAM END TREATMENT - TANGENT TERMINAL END TREATMENT - FLAREDTERMINAL IMPACT ATTENUATOR BARRELS ) [ u O WIRE FENCE UEA'RiN ou -Motu TRAFFIC CONTROL MEDIAN BARRIER DELINEATOR RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER TEMPORARY POLICE OFFICER POPTABL11 CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN SIGN PANELS TYPE C SIGN PANELS TYPE D SIGN PANELS TYPE OVERLAY INSTALL SION TYPE C INSTALL SIGN TYPE SPECIAL nn lM11ATnn TYPE XLR N j x .m.= Q o i CLEARANCE Mnnnen AH TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM A TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM B TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM C COUNTY FURNISHED MATERIAL EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM A EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM B YSTEM C EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION TRAFFIC CONTROL INTERCONNECTION REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM 0 CONIFEROUS TREE 5' HT B &B CONIFEROUS TREE 8' HT B &B CONIFEROUS TREE 7' HI B &B DECIDUOUS TREE 1.5" CAL B &B (DECIDUOUS TREE 2.0 CAL B &B DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B &B II DECIDUOUS SHRUB 2' HT CONT PERENNIALS - PERENNIAL PLUGS TEMPORARY FENCE AQUATIC PLANT FENCE SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION _.. FILTER LOG TYPE ROCK BIOROLL SEEDING SEED MIXTURE 250 SEED MIXTURE 310 SEED MIXTURE 330 SODDING TYPE LAWN MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 7 DISK ANCHORING EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 2 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3 TYPE 3 FERTILIZER MULCH MATERIAL TYPE SPECIAL P501L BORROW (SPECAL1 LV SELECT TO SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW LV IX SPECIAL SEED M SEED MIX SPECIAL 2 SPECIAL SEED MO( LIVE STAKES PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW( PAINT PAVEMENT MESSAGE IRIGHT ARROW) PAINT (PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) POLY PREFORM PA VEMENT MESSAGE MONT ARROW) POLY PREFORM PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT -THRU ARROW) POLY PREFORM PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LT ARROW) PREF THERMOPLASTIC d 2 W H O m H N _ -- .-[O N N m m b N 2220 N N -s MN N OO m m H h N N N m H N 0 000. m m H mm N N NNO W.-; -10 m m o m m m m N N N 000102 m m m m N N N m m p m m 2m N N O N m W m 0 ... N N N W 2 m m 0 m mmm N N m m m m N N 000000 m m m N N m m m m N N m m m m m mm N N ^ =00000000 bl N m m Ym N N N N Nm m m m mmmw N N N 1∎ m m N N , .-.M016 000100 2 u A A N N N m m ti w N N N NNW 0000000 W m m 7 2 p n ............ N mmmmm NN N ,-.- 2 2 m m R f 2 N N N N W 0 0000 2 2 N mmulmm N N NI`1� m 1G m 2 N N 1� 00 m tD .^ 2 n N N mmm 000 m W n N N W m 0 0010 n b A m m N N N N 0 V N m mmmm N 000 2 2 0 N N V m m m N N N -33- STORM w k§ er Ma tp $N 'ESTIMATED C081 "» ..■ _, ° ®F 4 - /§KKfk - 22 39 490 44 200 $35 500 143 388 6753 440 $59.755 - - - 640,000 630.000 08015 009'66 - '1,492 § p§ 33830 388 » . 1 35950 339 359 08 355 38231 4709 703 __ a0 ° -.. e - ©- , © - ; W■ )§ j. \ 0 | �'- § © ®� #■ -- 1 61,703 6898 $525 l.0 » § N W 1 ESTIMATED QUANTITY 11 17300 460 75 8400 8400 12200 150 880 70 6810 1550 - - -- 70 - - -- §s 80 380 310 V Is TOTAL ESTIMATED C0131 om -- 6512 1 680 2 440 1 275 352 70 1 703 ■ =82§§ - - -- - -- !§ -& # 0 000 28 780 642,375. _... 39 490 44200 635 500 143 368 753 440 _ 659,755 , 680,000 6383,680 $17,440 I 618,400 640,000 I 630,000 #A ( ■K§§ § ■ $ TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY 11 17300 480 75 6400 8400 12200 150 880 70 6810 1550 70 580 125 60 380 310 _ 1053 1935 33830 ■ §7B 1547 82300 348470 1 35950 338 . .. __ © . - W ; i § §3 §§§5 ®s;,#tom.9m __ _, _ ;mamma;;! -- -- ■mciodp ....1,.............• _ - -- - Bq ®° . B - °m -ca.f • 00.996 00'009'6$ as 2ta COSTS: § EACH LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT UN FT UN FT LIN FT LIN FT UN FT LIN FT LIN FT UN FT LIN FT LIN FT SO FT 1 SQ FT CU YD CU YD SQ FT LIN FT LIN FT SD FT POUND POUND LUMP SUM SQ FT LIN FT LIN FT EACH LIN FT SQ FT UN FT UN FT SQ FT SD FT LUMP SUM LIN FT UN FT EACH EACH LUMP SUM EACH EACH LUMP SUM SQ YD LUMP SUM LUMP SUM § PAVEMENT MESSAOESRT ARROW) PREF THERMOPLASTIC 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT 12" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT 4" BROKEN LINE WHITE -PAINT 4" SOUD LINE YELLOW -PAINT 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -EPDXY 24" SOLID LINE WHITE -EPDXY 4" BROKEN LINE WHITE -EPDXY 8" DOTTED LINE WHITE -EPDXY 4" SOLID UNE YELLOW -EPDXY 4" DOUBLE SOUD UNE YELLOW -EPDXY 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY PREFORM 4" BROKEN LINE WHITE -POLY PREFORM 24" SOUD LINE WHITE -POLY PREFORM 24" SOLID LINE WHITE -PREF THERMOPLASTIC CROSSWALK MARKING -POLY PREFORM 'CROSSWALK MARKING -PREF THERMOPLASTIC STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (1A43) I2401.501 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (3Y43) 2401.512 BRIDGE SLAB CONCRETE (3Y36) 2401.513 TYPE MOD P -1 RAILING CONCRETE (Y48) 2401.513 (TYPE MOD P-4 RAILING CONCRETE (3Y48) 2401.516 RAISED MEDIAN CONCRETE (3Y46) 2401.541 REINFORCEMENT BARS 2401.541 REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED) 2401.601 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION 2401.818 BRIDGE DECK PLANING 2402.583 ORNAMENTAL METAL RAILING 2402.591 EXPANSION JOINT DEVICES TYPE 4 2402.595 BEARING ASSEMBLY 2402.803 STRUCTURAL TUBE RAILING DESIGN T -2 2404.501 CONCRETE WEARING COURSE (3U17A) 2405.502 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAMS MN83" 2405.511 DIAPHRAGMS FOR TYPE MN83 PREST BEAMS ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE TEXTURE (FRACTURED GRANITE) ARCHITECTURAL SURFACE FINISH (SINGLE COLOR) REMOVE OLD BRIDGE C-I -P CONCRETE PILING DEUVERED 12" C-I -P CONCRETE PILING DRIVEN 12" C-I-P CONC TEST PILE 80 FT LONG 12" C-I -P CONC TEST PILE 85 FT LONG 12" STEEL SHEET PIING (TEMPORARY) PILE POINTS 12" PILE ANALYSIS )E SYSTEM TYPE (8910) ITE SLOPE PAVING f SYSTEM (LIGHTING) SYSTEM (SIGNALS) Z 2582.501 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.502 2582.503 2582.503 ;kViNC4 §k#qq Mmeriai -34- • AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 9, 2007 TOPIC: Resolution No. 07 — 52, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract, 2007 Street Sealcoating Project Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on March 28, 2007. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid Pearson Bros., Inc $ 143,735.00 Allied Blacktop Co. $ 144,952.00 Astech Corp. $ 162,543.20 Engineer's Estimate $ 144,252.00 The low bid is approximately 0.40% below the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy of the complete bid tabulation is attached. The final completion date for this project is September 15, 2007. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Resolution Number 07 — 52 Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract for the 2007 Street Sealcoating Project be adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 07 -52 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - 2007 SEALCOAT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of 2006 Street Sealcoating project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Amount of Bid Pearson Bros., Inc $ 143,735.00 Allied Blacktop Co. $ 144,952.00 Astech Corp. $ 162,543.20 Engineer's Estimate $ 144,252.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Pearson Bros., Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Pearson Bros., Inc., in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the 2007 Street Sea {coating Project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to retum forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. John Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of April, 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS March 28, 2007 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Re: 2007 Sealcoating City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA Project No. 13849.000 Dear Mayor and City Council: 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (851) 2924400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Bids for the referenced project were received on March 28, 2007, with the following results. A complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information. Contractor Base Bid Pearson Bros. Inc. $143,735.00 Allied Blacktop Co. $144,952.00 ASTECH Corp. $162,543.20 Engineer's Estimate $144,252.00 Recommendation We recommend that you award the Contract to the lowest bidder, Pearson Bros. Inc., for their low bid of $143,735.00. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Project Manager TDP:cme Enclosure An Employee Owned Company _ 3 7" _ Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity 1l\V/1 rRVJCV, IYV. ,oInc.uvv ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: MARCH 28, 2007, AT 10:00 AM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PEARSON BROS.INC. ALLIED BLACKTOP CO. ASTECH CORP. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT ; PRICE AMOUNT $ 87,000.00_ $ 68,043.20 0 0 0 0 In ti to, $ 182,543.201 O N o 1 G . m fA to O o CV to O O 000 O N ID ID a N 17 ti CD V! (A O O 1D 1" M (A $ 144,852.00 0 0 O 1. 1t) 69 $ 1.00 0 0 000 0 0 in (D 0 tD o0 o m -69 O 10 N •- 69 $ 143,735.00 o o 00� ar9- CD 69 69 o es $ 72,500.001 $ 67,252.00I $ 4,500.00 0 0. rl N Z CA O O O o� ID Vi 69 $1.20 TN GA CD J O O O tD O r 7 m- in 3,750 MODIFIED FA -2 1/8" TRAP ROCK CHIPS CRS -2 ASPHALT ,CRACK SEALING TOTAL v- N t7 • • • AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 9, 2007 TOPIC: Resolution No. 07 — 53, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract, 2007 Overlay Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:30 a.m. on March 28, 2007. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid W B Miller Inc. $ 169,929.50 ASTECH Corp. $ 185,470.20 North Valley, Inc.. $ 191,535.12 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $ 196,044.50 Rum River Contracting $ 206,939.00 Hardrives Inc. $ 214,171.00 Midwest Asphalt Corp $ 219,976.75 T A Schifsky & Sons Inc. $ 242,747.50 Knife River Corp. $ 248,896.40 Engineer's Estimate $ 188,564.00 The low bid is approximately 11% under the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy of the complete bid tabulation is attached. The final completion date for this project is October 31, 2007. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Resolution Number 07 — 53, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract for the 2007 Overlay Project be adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 07 -53 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - 2007 OVERLAY PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of 2007 Overlay Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Amount of Bid W B Miller, Inc. $ 169,929.50 ASTECH Corp. $ 185,470.20 North Valley, Inc. $ 191,535.12 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $ 196,044.50 Rum River Contracting $ 206,939.00 Hardrives, Inc. $ 214,171.00 Midwest Asphalt Corp $ 219,976.75 T A Schifsky & Sons, Inc. $ 242,747.50 Knife River Corp. $ 248,896.40 Engineer's Estimate $ 188,564.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that W B Miller, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with W B Miller, inc., in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the 2007 Overlay Project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. John Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of April, 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS March 28, 2007 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Re: 2007 Overlay Project City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA Project No. 13849.001 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 252 -4400 (651) 292-00B3 fax www.tkda.com Dear Mayor and City Council: Bids for the referenced project were received on March 28, 2007, with the following results. A complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information. Contractor Base Bid W. B. Miller Inc. ASTECH Corp. North Valley Inc. Northwest Asphalt Inc. Rum River Contracting Hardrives, Inc. Midwest Asphalt Corp. T.A. Schifsky & Sons Knife River Corp. Engineer's Estimate Recommendation We recommend that you award the Contract to the lowest bidder, W.B. Miller Inc., for their low bid of $169,929.50. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments you may have. $169,929.50 $185,470.20 $191,535.36 $196,044.50 $206,939.00 $214,171.00 $219,976.75 $242,747.50 $248,896.40 $188,564.00 Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Project Manager TDP:cme Enclosure An Employee Owned Compan - 4 1 -ig Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity W N j p CD CO J CA CT A CO N+ • TKDA PROJECT NO. 13849.001 ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS RIDS OPENED: MARCH 28. 2007, AT 10:30 AM IMP ITOTAL m� M`. mr ZZ( 71 0. mi D' �' m D Cr) Z v M a 0 N 0.144nFR FAR DRAINAGE CORRECTION IN CUL -DE -SACS REMOVE DRIVEWAY MATERIAL BIT \A/FARINA COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 4 (FOR DRIVES) >�: -1tni Z O < m Co 01 c m I IRITI IMINn! IS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 1 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 3 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 4 =r� O CD ° 0 c ? X=10 m�_Z C FC= r� C Z O D CA 01 220 250 250 01 00 008 0917'1 009'1 1 14,720 725 43.2 m= Dm LF — SY SY r— -nDZZm-G -A-173 0tnm -GD 1.71 0 N 0 69 N6969 O N Ur 1\ 0 0 0 EA 0 $43.00 $47.00 $1.50 $5,000.00 $0.60 $6.00 $135.00 69 0 A O 00•000'6 $] iA O O $ 550.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 5,000.00, $ 1,000.00 EA 69 69 -+OOoJ J A 0 0 0 O O O $ 5,000.00 $ 8,832.00 $ 4,350.00 $ 5,832.00 EA Js_ O 000006 0 EA 69 O Cr 0 0 EA EA EA W NCns 0 0 0 69 EA EA EA 6969 EA N - CJi A- A+O CA 00 in NAOOAO 0- N 0 0 0 0 EA m N 0 in 0 E969 A O O 00000004+0)0 0)000000inooc0o 0000000000000 694/4 W 01 J O 01 6969 Ni` J 901 LT A 0 69 EA 696969 E969 Cr) CT C43 CMN Ns Cn0)CA-CD Cn 0 0 01 -+ 1,3 CO O V1 CO0 EA N 00-+ O 0 0000001 En EA O N 0 C.) EA EA EA LA N En O Cn N 69 69 EA 69 EA 49 EA 0) 0 AAs O N A N O LA 0 0 O N Cal O 0) 01 O (b 01 A 0 CO 0)O %Id 0:111 69 01 74,- J O N -42- 6 1 69 N CA O 000r 0 0 69 En co En 6 O J 0 0 0 0 EA 69 69 -, NiACAAC.)CA0) N En Cn 01 En N 00 En 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 EA 69 69 EA 69 69 CA -+ N J 10 N 0 O CA -+ 01 0 4. 0 ONNNO Lo CD 0 En 0 0 Cn N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = ). C) O97 C D Z C- -I 1 W N j0 0 Co J 0) CT A W N -+ TKDA PROJECT NO. 13849.001 BIDS OPENED: MARCH 28, 2007, AT 10:30 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION NORTH VALLEY INC. NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL nccCRtpTInMI QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT )TOTAL r Z ! . r,r_unvc nnin ocDI Ars= (`ATPI -I RARIN ITYPF 41121 BIT. WEARING COUKSI 23110 I ¥t't LV 4 (run univco) GRADER FOR DRAINAGE CORRECTION IN CUL -DE -SACS TDc �n? A- n�i �Z DO1 m� D m� ;am Cl) C lC m p ncanr+rr rvnLu'w.., 1 ,.., ..,..,...., BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 3 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 4 I1m innwnl IS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT CCr)CD m .i o r � co m O 5 220 250 250 CT Co_ O o J UI O O O 725 43.2 A N' 0 EA I HR mrrG) -<mm >ZZ —i-1 CY RS < > I $ 2,379.56 I $ 135.00 $ 2.50 $ 3.50 $ 1300 $ 2.25 $ 2.50 $ 43.93 $ 47.56 -$ 2.00 $ 135.00 EA O .-1 UI $ 2,500.00 GA A v 00) $ 675.00 $ 550.00 $ 875.00 I S 3 250.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 5,832.00 $ 79,074.00 $ 68,962.00 HA s 69 N 0 EA b9 N 0 C OCIJAN CI O O o en EA N UI 0 0 EA ER Ca CT Ca 0 0 EA -+J .-4 Co EA EA AAJ 4, O) 01000) CA UI en GAGA 0U700 o O C)1 en 4, O O O 0 — I i I . • 1 GA N: CS C C C C L$ 1,125.00 $ 4,300.00 ER CO C $ 1,400.00 6A EA CCDD Co O +C.)-CO CD CDAN N CD CT C 0 0 EA 6A [.) 4, UIm CD O 0 0 fA OD.. 010 CO CI 0 EA O O O 0 ER EA N A_ na J CA CI CI 00000 fA ER _ Ja Co Co Co ER EA N CO O En EA N J CI c) ER EA j Co ? CD -.4 4, FA EA O N CI CT 000 EA O 0) $ 4,000.00 6A 0 CO C.D C) 4 3 I I $ 14,502.00 $ 825.00 $ 3,700.00 $ 125 00 $ 440.00 EA -9 CA O o 0 EA 496969 Co A J 0) CD s N in o 0 0 CT -• -9 -Co Co N C in 0 0 t1,ts3L.IJU • EA . O O o O TECTS•PLANNERS RIVER iACTING TOTAL AMOUNT I iW N;o CD CO V CO Cn A C.>N -+ TKDA PROJECT NO. 13849.001 BIDS OPENED: MARCH 28, 2007, AT 10:30 AM `DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION HARDRIVES, INC. MIDWEST A: ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT tin DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE (TOTAL I REMOVE DRIVEWAY MATERIAL BIT. WEARING COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 4 (FOR DRIVES) GRADER FOR DRAINAGE CORRECTION IN CUL -DE -SACS RFMOVF AND REPLACE CATCH BASIN (TYPE 4021 CO 0 m D { cn 74- C I 0 RITZ IMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT (BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 4 HAUL OUT EXCESS MILLINGS (LV) RESHAPE MILLINGS (3 %CROWN) BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 3 m � Z c° 0 co z 500 220 250 250 5 I 6 1 14,720 725 43.2 1,800 1,450 800 LF LF SY SY HR EA EA SY CY RS TN TN GA $ 5.50 $ 2.75_ $ 5.65 $ 17.25 _$ 150.00 $ 3,500.00 69 696f> 6969 Lt) N AAO O —, CD A LO V-• O V 0 0 0 0 A O cn O O O O O O I$ 214,171.00 $ 2,750.00 _$ 605.00 $ 1,412.50 $ 4,312.50 $ 750.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 20,608.00_ $ 5,075.00 $ 2,808.00 $ 79,200.00 $ 71,050.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 9.40 _ $ 2.95 _$ 4.10 $ 23.50 $ 100.00 $ 4,675.00 1 _$ 5,000.00_ $ 0.45 $ 11.85 $ 125.00 $ 45.60 $ 48.25 $ 1.90 69 N_ CD CD V CO J CM 69 6.) 44646.9 VI N co O s A O Cn W O CO V Cn O V N A O OO Cn CT CD OONOO 0OOOOOO 0000000000 69 64 64 6964 69 419 O CD -+ CD N CJ> CO CO Ch Cn CD O A CD) 0 N O CO O CD N O A O EM CD ON O O 01 Ca CI 164 6 ) Vi 69 Vi 1 I A -+ _ I O CO N N CO 1 0 0 in O Co 1 O O O O O 69 64 69 69 69 69 69 CD O Cn Cn O O Co Cn N CM 0 0 O O in in C' (J Co O O O O O O CO O mod' "1 > 64 W9 69 64 619 > • A CJ W > V Cn 1 A A. > O O N A 0 > 0 Cn OOO >C'CCOOOOOOOinCa > 0 0 0 0 0 69 69 69 69 Ui 64 69 CO CD N O A V A N CO A Cn s Ut Cn O 0 V O N O O cal O co V N O b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 • 3 ti CZ CD -45- CJ N j O CD CD V O) CT A W N -� ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: MARCH 28, 2007, AT 10:30 AM `DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION KNIFE RIVER CORP. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT TOTAL REMOVE AND REPLACE CATCH BASIN (TYPE 402) GRADER FOR DRAINAGE CORRECTION IN CUL -DE -SACS IBIT. WEARING COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 4 (FOR DRIVES) REMOVE DRIVEWAY MATERIAL [SAWCUT BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAYS BITUMINOUS CURBING BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT `BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 4 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 2360 TYPE LV 3 RESHAPE MILLINGS (3% CROWN) HAUL OUT EXCESS MILLINGS (LV) RECLAIM BITUMINOUS MOBILIZATION O) Cr Cfl O 250 N O O O L 800 A o co C' 43.2 N C CD 14,720 s D� { -(TT>zZco azzcn� -< AS m a L$ 3,358.51 105.72 EA V fJ-D V E.9 CD O EI9 A ?CD V ER s O) •fl CD CA r!! CD CD i W EA A CD CDC V ED J -., -+ O EH O) W $ 1.39 1_$ 5,183.77 EA N A CD CD CD ja O EA N _O - -+ O O)O b9 GI co CA $ 4,317.50 $ 2,025.00I $ 083.40 I 69 _CD CD O CD O is 1,488.00 ER CD CO co CM O $ 89,946.00_ •`) A V CD in NC7) Hi _ -i O) CD CJ L $ 20,460.80) ER C)) -+ W -1 V TA 111111111 Ef§69 EA 69 EA EA EA 49 ER ER 11111 Ep ER EA ER -45-