Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06/11/2007 Council Packet
REVISED Monday June 11, 2007 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) City Council: Mayor Bergeson, Council Members Carlson, O'Donnell, Reinert & Stoltz City Administrator: Gordon Heitke ➢ Open Mike / Public Comment Several tenants of Spirit Hills Retail Center addressed the Council regarding parking concerns. ➢ Call to Order and Roll Call 6:30 p.m. — Present were Mayor Bergeson, Council Members O'Donnell, Reinert, Carlson and Stoltz ➢ Pledge of Allegiance ➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items The agenda was not amended. A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) June 11, 2007 (Check No. 80228 through 80342) in the amount of $460,161.88; ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No.2686 through 2702) in the amount of $24,162.83 Pg 3 -18 B) Consider approval of May 29, 2007 Council Work Session Pg 19 -20 Minutes C) Consider Resolution 07 -88, Authorizing Performance Agreement Pg 19a -c With Taylor Corporation (Ad Graphics Inc.) for Parking & Stormwater Improvements Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by Carlson, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1A through 1C, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote migNo A) 2006 Audit Report — Darwin Viker & Brock Geyen of LarsonAllen, LLP i) Motion to Accept 2006 Audit Report Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by O'Donnell, to accept the 2006 Audit Report, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote Pg 19d Council Agenda A) A) None -2- REVISED Conditional offer of employment for vacant Police Officer position Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by Stoltz, to approve a conditional offer of employment to Heather Meyer, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote None Consideration of Resolution No. 07 87, Granting a Conditional Use Permit for to Allow Earth Material Storage and Excavation, (Birch and 12Th Avenue), LaMotte Property, Jim Studenski 6/11/2007 Pg 19e B) Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -83, Approving Grading Pg 33 -52 Only Development Agreement, The Preserve, Jim Studenski Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by O'Donnell, to table the matter of Resolution No. 07 -83, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote C) Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -84, Accepting Feasibility Pg 52a -b Study and Calling for Hearing on Improvements, West Shadow Lake Drive Area, Jim Studenski Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by Reinert, to approve Resolution No. 07 -84, was adopted by a voice vote; Mayor Bergeson abstained D) Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -85, Accepting Feasibility Pg 52c -d Study and Calling for Hearing on Improvements, Shenandoah Area, Jim Studenski Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by Carlson, to approve Resolution No. 07 -85, was adopted by a voice vote; Mayor Bergeson abstained E) Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -86, Approving Plans Pg 53 -55 and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids, Lino Park Grading, Jim Studenski. Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by Stoltz, to approve Resolution No. 07 -86, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote Council Agenda -3- REVISED 6/11/2007 A None. A) Consider approval of May 29, 2007 City Council Meeting Minutes Council Member Reinert absent Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve the minutes of May 29, 2007 as presented, was adopted by a voice vote; Council Member Reinert abstained Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Stoltz, to adjourn at 7:40 p.m. was adopted by a unanimous voice vote Pg 56 -61 AL Tuesday, June 14 4. Wednesday, June 13 Thursday, June 14 Thursday, June 14 • Wednesday, June 20 ▪ Monday, June 25 • Monday, June 25 Community Calendar- A Look Ahead June 12 - June 25, 2007 6:30 p.m., City Hall Library 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers 6:30 p.m., Community Room 6:15 p.m., Hugo City Hall 6:30 p.m., Community Room 5:30 p.m., Community Room 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Charter Review Task Force Planning & Zoning Charter Commission Special Meeting I -35WE Coalition Comp Plan Adv. Panel Council Work Session Council Meeting EXPENDITURES JUNE 11, 2007 • • Date: 05/24/2007 Time: 10:57:25 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 6354 - 6354 Trans #: (A) Line #• (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend. N • Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Grose Discount Lost 000715 HEMSTAD, JULIE 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 000743 BOWDICH, JACKIE M. 1 868.58 868.58 .00 .00 000803 HOSHAW, CARRIE 1 5.00 5.0D .0D .DD 000873 FUHR, MARK 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 539.27 539.27 .00 .00 001706 CARSON, KEN 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 001772 TRUDEAII, TINA 1 5.00 5.00 .00 .00 002245 LANG BUILDERS, INC. 1 5,500.00 5,500.00 .00 .00 003250 KCEL ENERGY 1 5,736.89 5,736.89 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 9 12,729.74 12,729.74 .D0 .0D* • Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 10:56 :51 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice 3ournal dies: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 6360 6360 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000017 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE 1 112.36 112.36 .00 .00 000038 ACTIVE NETWORK, INC. (.COM) 1 16.81 16.81 .00 .00 000065 SCHARBER & SONS, INC. 1 42.60 42.60 .00 .00 000095 ADVANCED GRAPHIK, INC. 1 36.42 36.42 .00 .0D 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 693.00 693.00 .00 .00 000150 ANOKA COUNTY FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1 3,248.52 3,248.52 .00 .00 D00157 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, INC. 1 471.08 471.06 .00 .00 D00191 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 120.61 120.61 .00 .00 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 179.84 179.84 .00 .00 000316 CLASSIC CAREFREE HOMES, INC. 1 4,450.00 4,450.00 .00 .00 03327 O'BRIEN, MATT 1 12.50 12.50 .00 .0D )B AFSCME COUNCIL #5 1 839.06 839.06 .00 .00 000423 TWIN CITY FAB, INC. 1 580.72 580.72 .00 .00 000449 RIVERBANK ARTS, LLC 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .D0 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,493.08 1,493.08 .0D .0D 000493 ASSET RECOVERY CORPORATION 1 2,265.70 2,265.70 .00 .00 000516 MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000539 TARGET 1 332.63 332.63 .DD .0D 000677 PHILIP'S TREE CARE 1 245.30 245.30 .00 .00 000679 RIGID HITCH, INC. 2 526.70 526.70 .00 .00 000693 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 2 7,750.00 7,750.00 .00 .00 000719 JOHNSTON FARGO CULVERT, INC. 1 313.96 313.96 .00 .0D Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 10:56:51 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount D0ur52 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 1 114.23 114.23 .00 .00 000772 FILTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. 1 357.78 357.78 .0D .00 000781 SANCHEZ, CHERYL 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .0D 000879 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH PLAN 1 43,433.34 43,433.34 .D0 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 256.21 256.21 .00 .00 000950 C. W. HOULE, INC. 1 2,452.00 2,452.00 .00 .00 001013 ALTERNATOR & STARTER STORE, THE 1 63.90 63.90 .00 .00 001016 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1 1,307.75 1,307.75 .00 .00 001101 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 3,280.00 3,280.00 .00 .00 001223 CROSS NURSERIES, INC. 2 1,827.73 1,827.73 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 2 196.28 196.28 .0D .00 D01301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 4,258.50 4,258.50 .D0 .D0 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 402.46 402.46 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 394.80 394.80 .00 .00 0014B0 HAWKINS INC. 1 8,600.25 8,600.25 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 48.24 4B.24 .00 0 0 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENEFITS 1 1,133.71 1,133.71 .00 001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 206.08 206.08 .00 .00 D01809 ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1 197,715.80 197,715.80 .00 .00 001816 ANDERSON, SCOTT 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 001824 C'REAME'RY CROSSING 1 685.86 685.66 .D0 .00 001833 ADVANCED RECYCLERS 1 1,224.00 1,224.00 .00 .00 001841 DELAROSA, CRYSTAL 1 250.00 250.00 .00 .DD 001842 FT.TTOT CHERI 1 17.50 17.50 .00 .00 001848 FULTON, MIKE 1 17.50 17.50 .00 .00 001853 GTCTA C/0 MAT TRAN 1 40.00 40.00 .D0 .00 001854 GILBERT, MICHAEL 1 15.00 15.00 .D0 .DD Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 10:56:52 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount .'r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001856 HARTMAN, TODD 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 001859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 28.20 28.20 .00 .D0 D01880 HUGO FEED MILL, INC. 1 202.30 202.30 .DD .00 001897 JERRY'S AUTO PARTS E SALVAGE 1 372.75 372.75 .00 .00 001920 LITTLE, SCOTT 1 35.00 35.00 .DO .00 001935 MERCADO, VICTORIA 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 001947 MARCIANO, TONY 1 12.50 12.50 .00 .00 001969 NARRATIL, SUE 1 95.00 95.00 .00 .00 001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2 16,477.50 16,477.50 .00 .00 001977 I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC. 1 238.03 238.03 .00 .00 001982 O'HARA, MATT 1 30.00 30.00 .DD .00 002003 ROBERTS, JOFT.Tx 1 65.00 65.00 .00 .00 002020 WHALEY, BECKY 1 5.00 5.00 .00 .DD 002052 WILSKE, DAVE 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00 002093 REHBEIN, RANDY C. 1 2,800.00 2,800.00 .00 .D0 1111097 NIECE, TERI 1 65.00 65.00 .00 .00 '9 WASMUND, PATTI 1 198.00 198.00 .00 .00 002113 KADLFUSS, RENEE 1 137.75 137.75 .00 .00 002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 829.50 829.50 .00 .00 002332 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 1 2,021.29 2,021.29 .00 ' .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 2 936.01 936.01 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 4 152.04 152.04 .00 .00 002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 3 1,743.50 1,743.50 .00 .00 D02592 TURFWERKS /DAVIS EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 1 180.94 180.94 .00 .00 00265D MIDWEST RADAR & EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 300.00 300.00 .00 .00 002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 257.03 257.03 .00 .00 003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 2 247.53 247.53 .00 .00 • Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 10:56:52 City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 4 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount 003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 1 34.14 34.14 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 1,976.13 1,976.13 .00 .00 003271 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1 159.73 159.73 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY BOWES, INC. 1 238.28 238.28 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 5 422.20 422.20 .00 .00 003848 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP, INC. 2 1,261.12 1,261.12 .00 .00 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 1 1,475.75 1,475.75 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 1 458.98 458.98 .00 .D0 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2 751.81 751.81 .00 .00 004063 ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE BUREAU 1 1,506.64 1,506.64 .00 .00 004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 263.27 263.27 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 54.31 54.31 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 3 2,418.01 2,418.01 .00 .00 004350 T.K.D.A. 21 47,194.74 47,194.74 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 2 22,814.29 22,814.29 .00 .00 004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC. 1 435.99 435.99 .00 0 2 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD. 3 34,060.05 34,060.05 .00 004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 2 258.29 258.29 .00 .OD 004666 BOR, BARBARA 1 100.00 100.00 .0D .00 004730 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC. 2 84.76 84.76 .00 .00 004840 MINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 2 43.46 43.46 .00 .00 005022 PITNEY WORKS RESERVE ACCOUNT 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00 006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .0D 007214 PICKEL, STEVEN 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 .00 .00 900224 NORTH COUNTRY BUILDERS 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 .00 .D0 900523 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. 1 500.05 500.05 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 148 446,851.70 446,851.70 .00 .00* - 8 - • Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 10:58:19 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal .ges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 6362 - 6362 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000440 ANOAA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 56.00 56.00 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 524.44 524.44 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 2 580.44 580.44 .00 .00* • • Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 11:03:54 Ranges: Operator: JAL Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Jou_Tiia #: Bank #: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) 6355 - 6365 (A) Options: Print Ranges /Options: Y # of copies: 1 Page on Department: N Department Vendor Name Description MAYOR /COUNCIL MAYOR /COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION AP "T3S25TRATION 3 ISTRATION Ate_ _1SISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING AFSCME COUNCIL #5 PAYROLL WITHHOLDING RELI STAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE MINNESOTA STATE'RETI PAYROLL WITHHOLDING CENTENNIAL LAKES POL REIMBURSE EAGLE BROOK OV DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE DELAROSA, CRYSTAL REIMBURSE PERMIT APPLICA LAW ENFORCEMENT LABO PAYROLL WITHHOLDING MN CHILD SUPPORT PAY TERRY MECKLE/0014011778- Total for Department ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNM MEETING /JOHN PRESS PUBLICATIONS, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Total for Department 401 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNM RELIARTAR LIFE INSUR PREFERRED ONE COMMON DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE PRESS PUBLICATIONS, PRESS PUBLICATIONS, ADMINISTRATION PRESS PUBLICATIONS, Total for SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE MEETING /GORDON LIFE INSURANCE HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL GROUP INSURANCE LEGAL RATES ORDINANCE 04 -07 ORDINANCE 05 -07 Department 402 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE Total for Department 406 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE IMAGE PRINTING & GRA REPORT COVERS Total for Department 407 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE - 1 0 - Amount 179.84 839. OB 1,136.12 9,805.50 1,307.75 3,280.00 2,392.48 250.00 829.50 257.03 20,277.30* 28.00 118.80 146.80* 28.00 23.75 2,266.74 132.33 41.23 89.80 22.20 88.80 59.20 2,752.05* 4.75 43.23 5.29 53.27* 14.97 1,430.37 112.74 64.08 103.16 1,725.32* 4.75 • • • Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 11:03:54 • Department Operator: JAL Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PREFERRED ONE COMMUN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE Total for PLANNING & PLANNING & PLANNING & PLANNING 6 PLANNING & PLANNING F. PLANNING & ZONING ZONING ZONING ZONING ZONING ZONING ZONING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV fi PDLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE • HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE GROUP INSURANCE Department 415 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR PREFERRED ONE COMMUN DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE WASMDND, PATTI T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. Total for LIFE INSURANCE HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE GROUP INSURANCE REGISTRATION /PAUL B 49/C0 J -APRIL COMP PLAN /APRIL Department 416 '07 GENERAL ENGINEERING/ '49 CLUB /APRIL HARDWOOD CREEK /APRIL Total for Department 417 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRI GIS SERVICE /APRIL Total for Department 418 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF ADVANCED GRAPHIx, IN AID ELECTRIC SERVICE ANOKA COUNTY FINANCE RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR TARGET BOWDICH, JACKIE M. PREFERRED ONE COMMUN DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE CREAMERY CROSSING I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY KAULFUSS, RENEE MENARDS, INC. MIDWEST RADAR & EQUI xCEL ENERGY SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL STREICHER'S, INC. UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, Total for PERMITS LETTERING SIREN MAINTENANCE 15T QTR SHARED COST LIFE INSURANCE BATTERIES /FOOD SUPPLIES REIMBURSE TUITION /BOOKS HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL GROUP INSURANCE LUNCHES /SENIOR FAIR UNIFORM SUPPLIES REIMBURSE TARGET PURCHAS END CAP KUSTOM EQUIPMENT MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL BAGS DUFFEL BAGS UNIFORM SUPPLIES UNIFORM SUPPLIES Department 420 352.18 32.20 16.42 405.55* 9.5D 704.36 64.40 30.42 99.00 58.55 817.72 1,783.95* 14,207.34 3BD.41 3,670.63 18,258.38* 11.87 924.41 BB.57 12.83 46.75 452.75 1,537.18* 112.36 36.42 693.00 3,248.52 133.00 276.48 868.58 14,780.92 431.63 394.80 458.34 685.86 238.03 137.75 48.70 300.00 3.27 390.37 870.75 54.31 258.29 24,421.38* Date: D6/01/2007 Department Time: 11:03:54 Operator: SAL Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS ST"*TTS TS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE Total for Department 421 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE PREFERRED ONE COMMUN HEALTH INSURANCE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE WASMUND, PATTI REGISTRATION /CHRIS W T.K.D.A. '07 GENERAL ENGINEERING/ Total for Department 422 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, MIXING TRAILER RENTAL /80 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT MEMBERSHIP JOHNSTON FARGD CULVE CULVERT COMMERCIAL ASPHALT C HOT MIX PREFERRED ONE COMMUN HEALTH INSURANCE C. W. HDULE, INC. REPAIR CATCHBASINS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE MENARDS, INC. SCREWS XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL PRESS PUBLICATIONS, LEGAL RATES T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SO ASPHALT T.K.D.A. '07 SURFACE WATER /APRIL VIKING INDUSTRIAL CE BOOTS VIKING INDUSTRIAL CE EAR PLUGS /GLASSES /MUFFS/ Total for Department 430 sCHARBER & SONS, INC MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RIGID HITCH, INC. RIGID HITCH, INC. PREFERRED ONE COMMON ALTERNATOR & STARTER DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF FOREST LAKE FORD, IN ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE JERRY'S AUTO PARTS & MTI DISTIBUTING, INC FACTORY MOTOR PARTS FACTORY MOTOR PARTS FACTORY MOTOR PARTS PLUG SWITCH LIFE INSURANCE CHARGER /BATTERY /BOLT /KIN HITCH HEALTH INSURANCE REPAIR STARTER DENTAL INSURANCE BEARING /CUP GROUP INSURANCE STROBE BEACONS AXLE ASSEMBLY BELT /OIL /FILTER /ELEMENT BRAKE ROTOR /062 BRAKE ROTOR /759 BRAKE SHOES & ROTOR /958 14.25 1,868.34 94.37 44.51 2,021.47* 19.0D 2,002.61 136.88 71.17 57.57 99.00 2,386.44 4,772.67* 148.78 34.91 500.0D 313.96 114.23 3,292.49 2,452.00 236.70 44.04 93.71 33.65 4,637.9D 133.20 2,418.01 3,799.14 17.66 67.10 18,337.48* 42.60 120.61 5.46 238.63 288.07 646.83 63.90 37.03 48.24 14.90 206.08 372.75 76.41 118.62 - 183.12 36.42 • • Date: 06/01/2007 Time 11:03:54 Operator: JAL • Department Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FT,T FLEET FLEET FLEET FACTORY MOTOR PARTS DIST ROTOR /852 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS ROTOR /900 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS ROTOR /956 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTI DUAL PURPOST PINTLE ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT TOOTH THANE HAWKINS POLAR REGULATOR /WIRE PST WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. ACETYLENE /OXYGEN WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. UTILITY KNIFE Total for Department 431 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS REL ASTAR LIFE INSUR GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS FILTRATION SYSTEMS, GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PREFERRED ONE COMMUN GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS DALCO, INC. GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS DALCO, INC. GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS LIFE- SAFETY SYSTEMS, GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS IMAGE PRINTING A GRA GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS METRO SALES INCORPOR GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS METRO SALES INCORPOR GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PITNEY BOWES, INC. GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS SMITH MICRO TECHNOLD GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS TWIN CITY GARAGE DOD GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PITNEY WORKS RESERVE LIFE INSURANCE FILTERS HEALTH INSURANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES DUST PAN JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DENTAL INSURANCE GROUP INSURANCE TEST /REPAIR EXIT SIGNS ENVELOPES COPIER MAINTENANCE STAPLES POSTAGE METER RENTAL MAINTENANCE KIT RoLT.x'R/ INFO THER GTRIP POSTAGE ESCROW GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIO TONER • rt.....5 PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS DS PARKS PARKS PARKS • Total for Department ALL SEASONS RENTAL, ALL SEASONS RENTAL, ALL SEASONS RENTAL, ALL SEASONS RENTAL, RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR PHILIP'S TREE CARE PREFERRED ONE COMMON CROSS NURSERIES, INC CROSS NURSERIES, INC DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF EARL ANDERSON AssDCI NEXTEL COMMUNICATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE HOME DEPOT CREDIT SE HUGO t'a'hli MILL, INC. MENARDS, INC. MSNARDS, INC. TURFWERKS /DAVIS EQUI MTI DISTIBUTING, INC XCEL ENERGY SHORT -FT.T TOTT- BENDRI 432 SILT SEEDER RENTAL/8111 SOD CUTTER RENTAL /7774 SOD UUTILea RENTAL /8019 SOD UUirhit RENTAL /8253 LIFE INSURANCE APPLY HERBICIDE HEALTH INSURANCE TREES TREES /VOLUME DISCOUNT DENTAL INSURANCE TRAFFIC CONES MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL GROUP INSURANCE FORKSTINES GOPHER GATTAR BLACK CEDAR BLADE KIT ROTARY BLADE MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL GIS SERVICE /APRIL 46.95 - 137.45 152.72 159.73 263.27 319.91 20.17 23.29 2,982.02* 4.75 357.78 352.18 256.21 3.83 192.45 32.20 10.25 2,021.29 832.85 1,645.95 97.55 238.28 751.81 435.99 5,000.00 10.00 12,243.37* 36.21 117.50 47.66 47.66 28.5D 57.51 1,221.14 1,537.61 -96.00 161.04 402.46 181.90 83.62 28.20 202.30 52.1D 17.59 180.94 171.12 78.31 697.50 Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 11:03:54 Operator: JAL Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Department Vendor Name Description Amount Total for Department 450 5,254.87* RECREATION ACTIVE NETWORK, INC. PROGRAM REC 16.81 RECREATION RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE 15.20 RECREATION PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE 1,131.26 RECREATION DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE 103.06 RECREATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL 13.90 RECREATION ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE 41.48 Total for Department 451 1,321.71* ENVIRONMENTAL RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE 5.23 ENVIRONMENTAL PREFERRED ONE COMMUN HEALTH INSURANCE 196.02 ENVIRONMENTAL DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE 11.28 ENVIRONMENTAL NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL 57.27 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE 11.58 ENVIRONMENTAL BUR, BARBARA REISSUE LOST CHECK 100.00 Total for Department 461 381.38* SOLID WASTE RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE 1.43 SOLID WASTE ASSET RECOVERY CORPO RECYCLING DAY 2,265.70 SOLID WASTE PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE 201.96 SOLID WASTE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE 9.66 SOLID WASTE ASSURANT EMPLOYE BE GROUP INSURANCE 4.99 SOLID WASTE ADVANCED RECYCLERS RECYCLING DAY 1,224.00 SOLID WASTE SAFETY KLEEN CORPORA RECYCLE CRUSHED OIL FILT 458.98 Total for Department 462 4,166.72* FORESTRY RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR LIFE INSURANCE 2.85 Fr -- ^TRY PREFERRED ONE COMMON HEALTH INSURANCE 196.02 F TRY CROSS NURSERIES, INC BOULEVARD TREES 386.12 FOn.:STRY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF DENTAL INSURANCE 11.27 FORESTRY ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE GROUP INSURANCE 5.84 Total for Department 463 602.10* Total for Fund 101 123,444.97* O'BRTEN, MATT REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 12.50 HEMSTAD, JULIE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 30.0D SANCBEZ,CHERLY REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 60.00 HOSHAW, CARRIE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 5.00 POPE, MARK REISSUE AP #77932 20.00 CARSON, KEN REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 25.00 TRUDEAU, TINA REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 5.00 ANDERSON, SCOTT REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 25.00 FT•7,IOT, CHERI REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 17.5D FULTON, MIKE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 17.50 GILBERT, MICHAEL REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 15.00 HARTMAN, TODD REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 40.0D LITTLE, SCOTT REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 35.00 MERCADO, VICTORIA REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 10.00 • • Date: 06/01/2007 • Department Time: 11:03:54 Operator: SAL Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL YOUTH SPORTS FLEET FLEET oTT: OTHER OTHER. MARCIAN°, TONY REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 12.50 NARRATIL, SUE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 95.00 O'HARA, MATT REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 30.00 ROBERTS, JOFT,TF REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 65.00 WHALEY, BECKY REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 5.0D WILSKE, DAVE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 35.00 WIEGE, TERI REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 65.00 Total for Department 625.00* RIVERBANK ARTS, LLC DAY CAMPS GENERAL SPORTS CORPO T- StiiRTS Total for Department 205 GTCTA C/O KHAI TRAN TENNIS WORKSHOP 200.00 1,350.00 1,550.00* 40.00 Total for Department 207 40.00* GENERAL SPORTS CORPO JERSEYS 6,400.00 Total for Department 20B 6,400.00* Total for Fund 201 8,615.00* ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE LICENSE TABS /NEW VEHICLE THANE HAWKINS POLAR '07 CHEV SILVERADO Total for Department 431 T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. Total for Fund 402 1,506.64 22,494.38 24,001.02* 24,001.02* '07 GENERAL ENGINEERING/ 2,919.57 IRIS LANE /APRIL 122.35 WATER TREATMENT STUDY /AP 1,466.31 Total for Department 499 4,508.23* Total for Fund 406 4,508.23* '07 OVERLAY /APRIL '07 SEALCOAT /APRIL Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 421 OTHER SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRI GIS SERVICE /APRIL OTHER T.K.D.A. '07 GENERAL ENGINEERING/ Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 422 OTHER REHHEIN, RANDY C. PARCEL 5, MOVE CLAIM Total for Department 499 • 1,495.02 694.35 2,189.37* 2,189.37* 325.50 3,579.42 3,904.92* 3,904.92* 2,800.00 2,800.00* Total for Fund 471 2,800.00* Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 11:03:54 Department Operator: JAL Page: 7 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount OTHER OTI EB WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WAr6,x WATER WATER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEwt 5, i SEWER SEWER SEWER ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT T.K.D.A. CSAH B -14 /APRIL Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 472 TWIN CITY FAB, INC. RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR TARGET PHILIP'S TREE CARE PREFERRED ONE COMMON CIRCLE PINES POST OF DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NF.XTEL COMMUNICATION HAWKINS , INC. ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE XCEL ENERGY T.K.D.A. HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS WATE DIrrUSER LIFE INSURANCE BATTERIES /FOOD SUPPLIES APPLY HERBICIDE HEALTH INSURANCE UTILITY POSTAGE DENTAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL CHEMICALS GROUP INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL WATER EMERGENCY & CONSER GASKETS METER INSTALLATIONS PORT /COUPLER Total for Department 494 Total for Fund 601 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR PREFERRED ONE COMMON CIRCLE PINES POST OF DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BE INFRATECH TECHNDLOGI XCEL ENERGY OLSON SEWER SERVICE, Total for CLASSIC LANG aUILDERS, T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A_ T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. T.K.D.A. PICKET., STEVEN SILT SEEDER RENTAL/6201 LIFE INSURANCE HEALTH INSURANCE UTILITY POSTAGE DENTAL INSURANCE GROUP INSURANCE JET /VAC MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL WATER JET /TELEVISE SEWER Department 495 Total for Fund 602 CAREFREE EOM 7765 CLYDESDALE /REIMS BL INC. 6239 W SHADOW LAKE DR /RE APOLLO LANDING /APRIL COX ESTATES /APRIL HOLIDAY STATION /APRIL LAMOTTE /APRIL MILLERS CROSSROAD 3 /APRI MOLIN CONCRETE /APRIL MOON MARSH /APRIL PINE GLEN 2 /APRIL POMPS TIRE /APRIL 1225 RONDEAU LAKE W /REIM 197,715.80 569.08 198,264.88* 198,284.88* 580.72 11.41 56.15 187.79 1,206.10 262.22 101.44 73.70 8,600.25 27.07 1,976.13 3,677.45 64.62 447.93 33,547.5D 50,620.4B* 50,820.46* 73.27 11.38 853.91 262.22 69.22 27.09 16,477.50 1,017.41 500.05 19,292.05* 19,292.05* 4,450.00 5,500.00 1,097.50 1,529.45 907.99 1,599.28 161.70 1,059.30 130.45 793.53 71.76 2,500.0D • • Date: 06/01/2007 Time: 11:03:54 Operator: JAL • Page: 8 City of Lino Lakes PM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Deportment Vendor Name Description Amount • • NORTH COUNTRY BUILDE 6162 LINDA LANE /REIMS BL Total for Department Total for Fund 801 Grand Total 2,500.00 22,300.96* 22,300.96* 460,161.8B* -17- • CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT • • Check Register FIRE GL GL Posting Period(s): 06/07 - 06/07 Check Issue Date(s): 06/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 Page: 1 Jun 01, 2007 12:29prn Per Date Check No Vendor No 06/07 06/01/07 06/07 06/01/07 06/07 06/01/07 06/07 06/01/07 06/07 06/01/07 06/07 06/01/07 06/07 06/01/07 06/07 06/01/07 06/07 06/01/07 Total 2694 Payee 2686 20140 MILO BENNETT 2687 20400 DAVID BRUDER 2688 30480 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES 2689 30485 2690 30490 2691 40200 2692 50130 2693 60100 2694 60600 06/07 06/01/07 2695 80200 06/07 06/01/07 2696 90020 06/07 06/01/07 2697 90151 06/07 06/01/07 2698 120450 06/07 06/01/07 2699 130440 06/07 06/01/07 2700 130460 06/07 06/01/07 2701 130830 CENTER MART CENTERPOINT ENERGY DIVERSIFIED TEXTURING & EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS FAIRVIEW FRANKLIN PRODUCTS JANET HAAPOJA IAFC MEMBERSHIP IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS CITY OF LINO LAKES METRO FIRE METROCALL MINNESOTA FIRE CHIEF MAGAZINE 06/07 06/01/07 2702 180500 RANDY ROLSTAD Totals: Invoice Description 11E DOWNS STAMPS APRIL UTILITIES STATION 1 FUEL STATION 2 GAS PAR TAGS ENGRAVED MEDICAL SUPPLIES MEDICAL EXPENSE FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLY FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLY FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLY MILEAGE REIMB MEMBERSHIP DUES SAFETY CAMP FLYERS TOWELS FLOW/FIT TESTS PAGERS MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION BLDG LIGHT REPL STATION 3 Inv Amount 38.30 4.00 245.11 37.40 61.36 71.50 179.47 74.00 214.33 228.26 145.83 588.42 21.00 195.00 63.23 19, 577.59 2,620.00 89.74 248.00 48.71 24,162.83 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check • • • AGENDA ITEM 1 C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 TOPIC: Resolution 07 -88, Authorizing Performance Agreement With Taylor Corporation (Ad Graphics) for Parking Lot and Stormwater Facilities Improvements ACTION: BACKGROUND 3/5 Taylor Corporation (Ad Graphics) intends to remodel the interior of the building to convert existing production space into additional office space. The addition of office space increases the need for parking spaces. This in turn requires increasing the size of the parking lot. Because this creates more impervious surface, it also requires improvements to the stormwater management facilities on the site. Such work typically occurs as part of the construction of a new building, which must be covered with a performance agreement. We do not allow construction that creates parking needs (such as the additional office space) unless the parking is constructed at the same time. The parking and stormwater improvements need approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District, and the final plans for the improvements have not been fully reviewed and approved by the City. Staff is attempting to expedite the City process to allow Taylor Corporation to begin construction as soon as possible. Authorization to prepare the performance agreement and for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute it will allow us to grant the building permit for the interior renovation as soon as we have the agreement completed and executed by Taylor Corporation. This will be prior to the next City Council meeting. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution 07 -88, authorizing the preparation and execution of a performance agreement with Taylor Corporation. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 Council Member moved for adoption of the following resolution: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 07-88 AUTHORIZING STAFF TO PREPARE AND MAYOR AND CLERK TO ENTER INTO PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH TAYLOR CORPORATION FOR PARKING LOT AND STORMWATER FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Taylor Corporation owns the property at 2300 Main Street, known as the site of Ad Graphics, and; WHEREAS, Taylor Corporation intends to remodel the interior of the building to convert existing production space into additional office space, and; WHEREAS the addition of office space increases the need for parking spaces under the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, and; WHEREAS this requires improvements to the existing parking lot as well as improvements to the stormwater management facilities on the site, and; WHEREAS the City requires a performance agreement for such improvements under Section 2, Subd. 6.E. of the Zoning Ordinace; THEREFORE, the Lino Lakes City Council hereby authorizes staff to prepare a performance agreement between the City and Taylor Corporation for parking lot and stormwater facilities improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said performance agreement on behalf of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the performance agreement shall include descriptions of the work to be performed and/or reference to plans, financial securities, and other elements typical to a performance agreement as well as elements specific to the project. John Bergeson, Mayor Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk • • • • • • Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 11th day of June, 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. l lc Resolution 88 -07, page 2 • • AGENDA ITEM 2A STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE June 11, 2007 TOPIC Accept 2006 Audit Report VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority (3/5) CKGROUND Darwin Viker and Brock Geyen of LarsonAllen, LLC will be in attendance at the meeting to provide an overview of the City's 2006 Annual Financial Report, present the auditor's management analysis and answer any questions you may have with regard to the financial condition of the City. The 2006 annual audit was undertaken by the City's auditors, LarsonAllen, LLC, earlier this year, with field work being completed in April. The auditors review all financial transactions and the financial reports of the City over the previous year for their fairness in presentation and for full disclosure of all material aspects of the City's financial condition. This review is conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in U.S. Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. The auditors concluded that the City's financial statements for 2006 presented fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City as of December 31, 2006. The auditors also issue their reports on the City's legal compliance with certain laws, regulations, contracts, etc., our internal control structure, and management issues. It should be noted that the City has received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada for its 2005 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. This is the tenth consecutive year that the city has received this award. We believe that the report issued for 2006 continues to uphold the standards of reporting excellence that this prestigious award represents. Following the presentation by Mr. Viker and Mr. Geyen, staff recommends that the City Council formally, by motion, accept the 2006 Annual Audit Report. 1) Approve a motion accepting the 2006 Annual Audit Report. 2) Return the report to staff for further review. ';ECOMMENDATION Option 1. - • AGENDA ITEM 4A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Dave Pecchia, Director of Public Safety MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 TOPIC: Conditional Offer of Employment VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The City has gone through the recruitment process for the position of Police Officer. Based on the result of the process, the city would like to extend a conditional offer of employment to Heather Meyer. Ms. Meyer will go through the regular background check procedures. • OPTIONS 1. Extend offer of employment to Ms. Meyer. 2. Decline to offer employment to Ms. Meyer. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. • • AGENDA ITEM 6B STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 TOPIC: Resolution No. 07 — 83, Approving Development Contract (Site Grading Only), The Preserve Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The City Council authorized a preliminary plat on August 28, 2006 to provide for a proposed development titled The Preserve. The Developer, Intergra Home is now requesting approval to begin grading work. The Preserve provides for the construction of 31 residential units on a 52.56 acre parcel of property located south of Birch Park on Pheasant Run South and Killdeer Drive. In accordance with the preliminary plat approval and City policy, staff has prepared a Development Contract for Site Grading Only. The contract provides for the following: 1. Submittal by the developer of a Letter of Credit in the amount of $233,000 representing 150 percent of the development improvement costs to insure completion of the project in accordance with the approved plans. 2. Deposit of a cash escrow in the amount of $40,000 to reimburse the City for costs incurred by the City related to the development and improvements of the site. The developer has reviewed the contract and is aware of the conditions set forth. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Resolution Number 07 — 83 be adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 07-83 RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR SITE GRADING ONLY, THE PRESERVE. WHEREAS, the City Council issued a preliminary plat approval for The Preserve on August 28, 2006, and WHEREAS, the Developer, Integra Homes is requesting approval to commence grading work of such development to be known as The Preserve; and, WHEREAS, the City's subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution of a development contract, between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes, prior to commencement of site construction activities and final plat approval to insure satisfactory completion of public improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves the Development Contract (Site Grading Only) with Integra Homes for The Preserve and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the City. John Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 11th day of June, 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Site Grading Only) The Preserve THIS AGREEMENT made this 11th day of June, 2007, is by and between the City of Lino Lakes, whose address is 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, 55014, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", and Integra Homes whose address is 12721 Overlook Road, Dayton, Minnesota, 55307 hereinafter referred to as the "Developer". WHEREAS, the Developer has received preliminary plat approval from the City Council for a plat of land within the corporate limits of the City known as The Preserve hereinafter called "Subdivision ", said land is legally described to -wit The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and that part of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter all in Section 28, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except GEMINI ESTATES and TRAPPERS CROSSING according to the recorded plats thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota; also except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said quarter - quarter; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along the north line thereof 360 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north line 388.48 feet; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West 345 feet; thence South 21 degrees 12 minutes East 166.94 feet; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 320 feet; thence North 0 degrees 22 minutes 58 seconds East 475 feet to the point of beginning; and also except that part of said quarter- quarter described as follows: Beginning at the northeast comer of said quarter - quarter; thence South 0 degrees 33 minutes 07 seconds West along the east line thereof 170.04 feet to Point "A "; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 418.54 feet; thence North 22 degrees 30 minutes East 183.38 feet to the north line of said quarter - quarter, thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north line 350 feet to the point of beginning; and also Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Beginning at said Point "A "; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 272.96 feet; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West 223.24 feet; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East parallel with the north line of said quarter - quarter 356.42 feet, more or less, to the east line of said quarter - quarter, thence North 0 degrees 33 minutes 07 seconds East along said east line 207 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, except that part thereof taken for road purposes. AND That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying northwest of the west right -of -way line of Holly Drive. WHEREAS, the Developer has requested approval to commence with site grading activities, and WHEREAS, the City Subdivision Ordinance and Minnesota Statute 462.358 authorize the City to enter into a performance contract secured by cash escrow or other security to guarantee completion and payment of such improvements following final approval; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARilES HERETO: that the I. DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Improvements to be installed at the Developer's expense by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to as 'Developer Improvements ". B. Improvements to be installed by the City and financed by the Developer are hereinafter referred to as "City Improvements ". II. DEVELOPER'S IMPROVEMENTS A. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare, at the Developer's expense, a grading plan. The Developer shall secure a contractor to install these improvements; said contractor shall be approved by the City at its ABSOLUTE discretion. All Developer improvements shall require City inspection and approval and, where appropriate, the approval of any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the following improvements according to the following terms and conditions: 1. Conservation Development Restoration and Management page 2 - 36 - • Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 a) "The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan for Conservation Areas" dated August 10, 2006, is included in this city council approval of the project. This includes the tasks and cost schedule in attachment C, (Revised August 10, 2006 for 11.9 acre restoration area) ". b) The following tasks must be completed prior to grading or logging of the site: Cutting/Removal/Herbicide Treatments (Year 1); and Oak Woodland Native Plant Salvaging and Transplanting (Into 2.0 Acres of Woodland); and installation of conservation fence. The developer must demonstrate these tasks are completed prior to grading or logging the site. 2. Grading Plan a) A final site grading plan, including certified wetland delineation, with maximum two -foot contours and cross sections as necessary shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to commencement of any site grading. b) The grading plan and all site grading shall be provided and conducted in accordance with the plan as approved by the City, NPDES requirements and the Rice Creek Watershed District. The Developer shall perform the work in accordance with a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requirements. c) The Developer shall be responsible for securing all required site grading and development approvals and permits from all Federal, State, Regional and Local agencies with jurisdiction or as applicable prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. 3. Erosion Control Plan a) The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. The erosion control plan shall also be subject to the approval of any other governmental agency having jurisdiction.. b) The Developer shall submit a Turf Establishment Plan which details topsoil placement, seeding, sodding, mulching, fertilizing and page 3 -37- Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 watering. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. 4. Tree Preservation Plan a) The Developer shall provide a tree preservation plan prior to any site grading and include a delineated preservation area, subject to the approval of the City prior to any work activity on the site. The tree preservation plan shall also be completed in accordance with the City Tree Preservation Policy, and shall be covered within a legal covenant for each property. The Developer shall provide a cash escrow as security, in the amount specified in Attachment B, to insure implementation of the Tree Preservation Plan. Site activities shall not commence until review of the plan and site has been completed and approved by the City Engineer, City Forester, and any other governing agency with jurisdiction as required. b) The Developer shall remove, dispose of, or treat all dead and diseased trees in accordance with the City Forester's recommendation before building permits will be issued. 5. Grading and Erosion Control Construction & Maintenance a) Prior to the commencement of site grading and erosion control, the Developer shall complete items IIA.1, IIA.2, and II.A.3 as listed above. b) The Developer shall grade the site to within 0.2 foot of the grades shown on the approved Grading plan. No deviations will be allowed unless a revised plan is submitted and approved by the City and all other regulatory agencies. c) All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented by the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the best potential for preventing soil erosion. d) Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development as applicable. Appropriate control measures as required by the City shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. e) Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land shall be exposed at any one period of time. page 4 - 3 8 - • • • Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 f) Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soil shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development. The Developer shall install four (4) inches of topsoil on all boulevards and seed or sod as approved by the City. The Developer shall make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops to bring them flush with the topsoil prior to occupancy. g) h) All disturbed areas shall be seeded using City seed specifications or sodded as designated per the plans. i) The street right -of -way, storm water storage ponds, and surface water drainage ways shall be graded prior to commencement of utility construction. j) Drainage swales, ditches, storm water storage ponds and other high risk erosion areas shall be protected from erosion. k) All remaining grading must be completed prior to issuance of building permits. 1) Protect streets from erosion deposits. This should include a combination of roadside silt fences, roadside sod strips, catch basin rock bale inlet protection, rock construction entrances, straw mulch, and/or street sweeping. m) The developer's engineer shall certify, in writing with an as -built survey, that all grading complies with the grading plan prior to issuance of building permits. n) A legal covenant shall be included within the homeowner's association documents prohibiting the use of phosphorus on lawns. o) The developer shall be responsible for ascertaining that site geotechnical and groundwater conditions are adequate and conforming with the grading and site improvements as proposed. 6. The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block corners and at all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed after all street and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. Lot comer irons on the back property line shall be installed so that the top of the iron corresponds to the finished ground elevation in accordance with the approved grading plan - guard stakes shall be appropriately installed to mark these irons. page 5 - 3 9 - Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 7. The Developer agrees to maintain, at all times before acceptance of the streets by the City, an access road suitable for use by emergency, police and fire department equipment The adequacy of such road shall be the sole determination of the City. Furthermore, such access road shall be located no more than 150 feet from any structure built within the Subdivision. 8. The Developer shall promptly clear dirt and debris, within public right -of- ways, and drainage and utility easements, resulting from construction by the Developer, its purchasers, builders and contractors within five (5) days after notification by the City. The Developer or its assigns shall be responsible for all necessary street and storm sewer maintenance including street sweeping, storm sewer cleaning, ditch cleaning and pond dredging, resulting from the accumulation of said dirt and debris, until all Certificates of Occupancy are issued. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when the streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth, hard driving surface and adequate drainage on all temporary streets. 9. Other Construction a) In the event that damage to the streets or other City infrastructure result from said improvement work, the Developer shall be responsible for effecting said repairs, or the City shall withhold escrows or deposits as the City deems appropriate and necessary. b) The Developer shall provide a financial security or cash escrow in an amount of $40,000 to assure completion of the grading and restoration, in the event that the work is not completed by the Developer. c) No burning of vegetation cleared during construction shall be allowed. 10. The project shall not be final platted until 2007 to comply with growth management policy. 11. All homeowners association declarations, covenants, and property and legal requirements as required in this Agreement shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review as required by the City's final plat requirements. In addition, an additional contract agreement shall be agreed upon between the City and developer that provides for the subsequent construction, ownership and maintenance of City owned utilities (sanitary sewer and water) and the access street that will be privately owned and maintained. page 6 - 4 0 - • Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 12. Cost of Developer's Improvements, description and completion dates are as shown on Attachment A. 13. Construction of Developer's Improvements: a) The construction, installation, materials and equipment shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. b) All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City and, where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. c) Prior to the acceptance of Developer Improvements by the City, the Developer shall obtain final plat approval and record the final plat which will dedicate all permanent easements necessary for the construction and installation of the Developer's and City's Improvements as determined by the City. d) All Construction debris and trash shall be properly disposed of at the developers expense and in a timely manner as determined by the City. 14. The Developer shall be required to obtain all necessary permits and approvals from all governmental agencies as required, including necessary right -of -way, temporary easements, or permanent easements for the construction. 15. The Developer shall make an application to FEMA for a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) to revised the existing Flood Plain maps consistent with the proposed grading plan. 16. Guarantee a) Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letters of Credit (1) The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Developer's Improvements and hereby guarantees the workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the City's final acceptance of the Developer's Improvements. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty (150 %) percent of the total estimated cost of page 7 - 4 1 - Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 Developer's Improvements. An Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Lino Lakes and shall state thereon that the same is issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of this Development Contract and construction of all required improvements in accordance with the ordinances and specifications of the City. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the terms and conditions of this contract. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended for additional periods of one year from present or future expiration ClatPs unless thirty (30) days prior to such the City Clerk or Administrator is notified in writing by certified mail that the Letter of Credit will not be renewed. b) Reduction of Escrow Guarantee. (1) The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit, or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed improvements at the time of the requested reduction. Prior to the final acceptance of the Developer' s Improvements the City shall require a Performance Bond or Cash Escrow to cover the warranty provisions of the agreement The amount shall be determined by the City Engineer III. CITY'S IMPROVEMENTS A. No City improvements are proposed under the grading project IV. RECORDING AND RELEASE A. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Page 1 hereof. City shall provide to Developer upon payment of all the special assessments levied against a parcel a release of such parcel from the terms and conditions of this Development Contract subject to provisions contained in this contract page 8 - 4 2 - • • • Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 V. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS A. The Developer agrees to establish a non - interest bearing escrow account with the City in an amount determined by the City Administrator or his designee for the payment of all costs incurred by the City related to the development of the plat and the Developer Improvements including, but not limited to, the following (See attachment B for Breakdown of costs): 1. Plat Review Fee 2. Planner Review Fee 3. Administration - 3% Construction Cost 4. Engineering a) Administration 5. Legal - Plat Review 6. Publications B. If the above escrow amounts are insufficient, the developer shall make such additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to reimburse itself from the Escrow. VI. BUILDING PERMITS A. The Developer agrees that building permits may be issued upon approval of the Final Plat by the City Council at which time all required Financial Security shall be in place with the City. The Developer further agrees that City Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer, and Bituminous Base Construction of the Streets, temporary street signs, gas, electric, and telephone will be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. B. The Developer shall submit an as -built survey certifying that all the grading complies with the grading plan prior to issuance of building permits. C. Model Homes The City agrees that one structure per ten (10) acres (1 home) can be installed as model homes upon approval of the Development Contract (Site Grading Only). The right to obtain such building permits shall be contingent upon the following: 1. Execution of this development contract, providing a Letter of Credit in the amount of $100,000.00 and an escrow amount of $10,000.00. 2. Construction shall be limited to maintain a minimum distance of 150' from the furthest exterior wall to an improved gravel street as per the State Fire Code. The Developer may construct and maintain such access in order to meet said requirements. page 9 - 4 3 - Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 3. Prior to release of the building permits for one structure per ten (10) acres (1 home), the builder shall enter into a separate agreement with the City which would not allow the building to be occupied after issuance of certificate of occupancy by anyone other than the builder for exhibiting the home for model purposes nor would they convey the property to any other third parties by any means until all of the public and private utilities have been installed to serve the building and accepted by the City. This includes all other requirements provided in this agreement D. Each lot must comply with erosion control measures to prevent any material from leaving the lot. The City of Lino Lakes will not perform any requested inspections on the lot until it complies to the erosion control requirements. E. Each lot must have a City approved Certificate of Grading showing the as -built survey prior to an issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer, its purchasers, builders or contractors to ensure compliance with the grading plan. VII. HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY A. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours set out in City Ordinances as follows: Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed VIII. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Upon completion of the grading work required by this contract and acceptance by the City, the site improvements shall remain privately owned and maintained. The City of Lino Takes, in the interest of public safety and welfare shall reserve the right to enter and maintain drainage facilities within the designated drainage and utility easements. An additional development contract shall be prepared agreed between the City and developer that will address subsequent site improvements after site grading is completed. Subsequent improvements shall include but not be limited to streets and utilities. IX INSURANCE A. Developer or all its subcontractors shall take out and maintain until one (1) year after the City has accepted the private improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of his subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for page 10 - 4 4 - • • • Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 bodily injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less then Two Hundred Thonzand and no /100 ($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of One NHllion and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The City, its employees, its agents and assigns shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer or all its subcontractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. X. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE A The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City_ in defense of enforcement of this contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees if the City prevails in such action. XL VALIDITY A. If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. XII. GENERAL A. Binding Effect 1. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. B. Notices 1. Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1 by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above. page 11 - 4 5 - Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 B. Final Plat Approval 1. The City agrees to give final approval to the plat of the Subdivision upon execution and delivery of this agreement and all required petitions, bonds, security, and documents including the following: 2. Some lots will have restricted back yards due to easements or other features of the development plat. The developer, builders, and future property owners should be aware of this. House structures shall only be built within the building pads on the approved plans. 3. Some lot lines, easements, and other features will require adjustments prior to city council review of the project. 4. Streets shall be 28' face of curb to face of curb and parking shall be prohibited on one side of the street. 5. Park dedication shall be cash with credit for construction of trails. 6. The trail corridor shall be dedicated as "park" on the final plat, not created as a separate trail easement. 7. "The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan for Conservation Areas" dated August 10, 2006, is included in this city council approval of the project. This includes the tasks and cost schedule in Attachment C, (Revised August 10, 2006 for 11.9 acre restoration area) ". 8. The following tasks must be completed prior to grading or logging of the site: Cutting/Removal/Herbicide Treatments (Year 1); and Oak Woodland Native Plant Salvaging and Transplanting (Into 2.0 Acres of Woodland); and installation of conservation fence. The developer must demonstrate these tasks are completed prior to grading or logging the site. 9. A permanent conservation easement shown on the plans shall be dedicated to the City. The easement document shall describe the restoration and management plan and its funning and implementation. The easement document shall be reviewed by the City prior to dedication of the easement and prior to final plat approval. 10. A homeowners association shall be created. Association documents shall describe the restoration and management plan, its funding, and its implementation. The association shall be responsible for and shall maintain a stewardship fund to implement the restoration and page 12 -46- Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 management plan for the open space areas defined by the conservation easement The stewardship activity shall be in accordance with the conservation easement and the approved restoration and management plan. Association documents shall be reviewed by the City prior to final plat approval. 11. The homeowners association shall be responsible for maintenance of the rain gardens. This requirement shall be included in the easement covenants and restrictions document. and this shall be included in the association documents. 12. The developer shall install signs along the conservation easement edge at side lot lines and other locations as determined by the City. Lot owners shall not remove, alter, or damage these signs and shall be responsible for any damage caused by owners, family, or guests. The homeowners association shall be responsible for maintaining, repairing and, if necessary, replacing the easement signs. This requirement shall be included in the easement covenants and restrictions document 13. A temporary cul de sac must be constructed on the west end of the extended Pheasant Run. 14. The project must obtain applicable approvals and permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to site work beginning and must comply with all conditions thereof 15. The City Engineer's review comments in the memos of July 25 and 27, and August 22, 2006 and previous review memos must be addressed to his satisfaction. 16. The preliminary plat is the primary plan sheet for lot configuration. Grading and other plans shall be brought into conformance with the lot dimensions on the preliminary plat and resubmitted for City review prior to site work beginning 17. Review and approval of the project are based on the following plans: Existing Features, 4/10/06, received July 14, 2006 Preliminary Plat, revised 8/13/06, received Aug 15, 2006 Preliminary Plat Inset A, revised 8/13/06, received Aug 15, 2006 Grading & Erosion Control Plan, revised 7/12/06, received July 14, 2006 Utility Plan & Profiles, received July 14, 2006 Mitigation Plan, revised 5/22/06, received July 14, 2006 Tree Preservation Plan, revised 4/10/06, received July 14, 2006 page 13 - 4 7 - Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 18. Approval of this resolution is contingent upon the rezoning Ordinance 08 -06 being in effect. 19. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City for the public purpose of a new well site. XIII. VIOLATIONS/BUILDING PERMITS A. In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Development Contract and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set out hereunder may refuse to issue building permits and/or Certificate of Occupancies to any property within the Subdivision until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City. XIV. PROPERTY TAXES A. Should the recording of the Final Plat occur after July 1, any and all property taxes on any public property dedicated as a part of this plat shall be the responsibility of the Developer. Dollars shall be incorporated into the escrow agreement to cover the cost of said property taxes. page 14 - 4 8 - • • DEVELOPER • Development Contract — Site Grading Only The Preserve June 11, 2007 By Developer STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES By Mayor All EST: By Clerk On this day of , 20_. before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared (Mayor) and (Clerk), to me known to be respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge that they executed the same on behalf of said City. STA'1E OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA Notary public On this day of , of 20_, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared (Developer), to me known to be the of , a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that they executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they/he executed the same on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public page 15 - 4 9 - ATTACHMENT A - GRADING ONLY SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NAME: The Preserve APPLICANT: Integra Homes ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS 1 SITE GRADING 2 EROSION CONTROL 3 SITE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 4 LANDSCAPING 5 STREET CONST. A. SubgradeBase Course B. Wear Course 6 STORM SEWER CONST. A. Trunk B. Lateral C. Surface Water Mgmt. Charge (s.f.) 7 SANITARY SEWER CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) B. Trunk Credit C. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) D. Lateral 8 WATERMAIN CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) B. Trunk Credit B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) C. Lateral TOTALS: BUDGET COST Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate NOTE e e e e Estimate e Estimate e Estimate e Estimate e a a Estimate e a a Estimate e See Attachment B for security amounts to be posted NOTE: a: b: c: d: e: f: Cost by City policy Estimated Cost or Budget by City Previously Assessed Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board Provided by Developer Estimate by Feasibility Study NUMBER OF REU's: 31 ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 17.57 6 -11 -2007 DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) $142,187 $7,670 $5,000 $154,857 $0 $0 • • ATTACHMENT B - GRADING ONLY CITY FEES •DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NAME: The Preserve APPLICANT: Integra Homes ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS 1 PLANNING/REVIEW A. Plat Review Fee B. Planner Review Fee 2 ADMINISTRATION A. Legal B. Administration Fee C. Publications 3 ENGINEERING A. Plan/Plat/Grading Review C. Construction Services D. Construction Staking E. City Engineering 4 DEVELOPMENT FEES A. Park Dedication Fee B. Sealcoating Fee C. Aerial Photo Fee BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING 6 DEVLOPMENT SECURITIES A. Tree Preservation B. Street Lighting - installation C. Street Lighting - operation D. Traffic Signing E. Street, Storm Sewer, Pond Maint. F. Other - Property Tax, FEMA TOTALS: • NUMBER OF REU's: 31 ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 17.57 BUDGET DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW COST NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) 03,000 b $2,850 b $1,000 a 3% of const. b $1,000 b $10,000 b $10,000 b $0 b $7,500 b $2075 /unit d $0.27 /SF b 9D /unit b $465/tree b 95 /unit b $2,500 a $265 $3,000 a b SECURITY AMOUNTS TO BE POSTED X = DEV. IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 1.5 (LETTER OF CREDIT) Y = CITY IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 0.35 (LETTER OF CREDIT, Z = CITY FEE COSTS X 1.0 (CASH ESCROW) NOTE a: Cost by City policy b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City c: Previously Assessed d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board e: Provided by Developer f: Estimate by Feasibility Study f: Estimate by Feasibility Study • $3,000 $2,850 $1,000 $4,650 $1,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $40,000 Att. A Att. B Total $154,857 $0 $233,000 00 00 00 $0 $40,000 040,000 6 -11 -2007 ATTACI IVIENT r' — June 11, 2007 (Total Per Tack I 1 Estimated Costs 1 0 o _ N 1 $26,6501 0 N m » N o N o N 700 M F) T 6F} (Subtotal $5,355.00 $5,355.00 $14,100.00 $5,875.00 1 $5,575.00 0 O O 0 o 10 M 0 0 1D 6' 0 0 CI l7 N $2,100.001 0 CO CD 10 N 0 0 N N h 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 CD 69 o CO 4- C 49 $2,084.20 $1,225.00 0 0 m N 0 0 0 m N $1,500.001 o 0 0 10 d! 0 0 0 10 ^ N 0 0 0 ID Y3 0 0 0 ID .0 Q 0 0 0 D 0 U D 0 m m :41 D D D m O 0 m O U D 0 D 0 0 m O U D m O m m 0 O 0 NU D m D D m D CO m O m 0 O m 0 0 I 0 O D CO 0 O CO m 0 f'� • Y a 0 m N- t• C I,- Q 10 10 10 P) o) P) n) 4- N P P O N 4- m C41 ^ O r 44 m D) O N m a `m Q 02§ D CO 00. 0. 0 U D D 0 o. U D 0. m n. E m 0. E m DD.` .7.7.7 m DD. m m 0. 0- 75 m C. 75 m 0. 75 CO 00. 75 m L 75 m O., 5 .7 m m D. 0. m py m m 0- O. 0 IA 0 0 R< N N 0 0 0 N y N 0 0 N 0 0 r N 0 0 h 0 0 W 0 0 ^ N 0 0 0 0 49 N CD N '' N 0 O N 0 10 ID Y! 0 0 17 M m CV N N m 10 tV N ^,_ N N o H) 17 N 0 y Wel Prairie seed mix Oak Savanna seed mix Oak Woodland seed mix Mixed Emergent Marsh seed mix Aspen Woodland seed mix Welland Mitigation seed mix Native Interaeeding Costs (Labor) 1 'Oak Woodland Native Plant Salvaging and Transplanting (Into 2.0 Acres of Woodland) 1 'Construction Monitoring by CCES Ecologists (Orchids, Wetlands, and Prairie Remnants) 1 Wetland Mitigation Basin (1.0 Acre) Monitoring and Reporting (MN WCA, Section 404) 1 Year 1 (Monitoring of 1,0 Acre Mitigation Area and Report) 1 Year 2 (Monitoring of 1.0 Acre Mitigation Area and Report) 1 Year 3 (Monitoring of 1.0 Acre Mitigation Area and Report) 1 Year 4 (Monitoring of 1.0 Acre MIIIgatlon Area and Report) 1 IYear 5 (Monitoring of 1.0 Acre MIIIgatlon Area and Final Report) 1 • • AGENDA ITEM 6C STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 TOPIC: Resolution No. 07 -84, Accepting Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing, West Shadow Lake Drive Street, Storm Sewer, Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvement Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes currently has approximately 100 miles of local streets. On May 14, 2007 City Council authorized the revision of West Shadow Lake Drive Feasibility study. As the City of Lino Lakes ages, the need for reconstruction of local streets becomes a greater priority. Streets that are in poor condition or have storm drainage problems substantially increase city maintenance costs. The West Shadow Lake Drive Area Improvement project will be funded by a combination of special assessments, Trunk Unit Funds, and general tax levies. The feasibility study, ordered by the City Council, has been completed. The next step in the process will be to accept the feasibility study and hold a Public Hearing on July 9th for the proposed improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Resolution No. 07 -84, Accepting Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing, West Shadow Lake Drive Street, Storm Sewer, Sanitary Sewer, and Watermain Improvement Project. Council Member moved for adoption of the following ordinance: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 07 -84 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING — WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE STREET, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted May 14, 2007, a study has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to West Shadow Lake Drive Street Improvement project for West Shadow Lake Drive from Birch Street to Northern Terminus, Shadow Court, and Sandpiper Drive by constructing street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain, and this report was received by the Council on June 11, 2007, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota States, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer is designated as the engineer for this improvement and he is directed to call for a public hearing for the West Shadow Lake Drive Street, Storm Sewer, Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvement project. 2. The Council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $5,583,000.00. 3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 9th day of July, 2007 in the Council chambers of the City Hall at 6:30 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 11th day of June, 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. 5�- • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 REVISED JUNE 11, 2007 FEASIBILITY REPORT WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE STREET, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, AND WATERMAIN CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 13849.005 I hereby certify that this Feasibility Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Lorne G. Wikstrom, P.E. License No. 23905 13849.005 FEASIBILITY REPORT WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE STREET, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. I. INTRODUCTION - GENERAL 1 II. PROCESS AND PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE 1 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY 3 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4 V. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS 10 VI. EASEMENTS 10 VII. PERMITS 10 VIII. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 APPENDIX NO. OF PAGES PROJECT LOCATION MAP 1 EXHIBIT A - C: EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 EXHIBIT D - F: PROPOSED UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 3 EXHIBIT G - I: PROPOSED STREET RECONSTRUCTION 3 PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS 4 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2 ii 13849.005 FEASIBILITY REPORT WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE STREET, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA L INTRODUCTION GENERAL The City Council authorized this updated Feasibility Report on May 14, 2007. The original Feasibility Report was prepared on June 8, 2005. There are approximately 100 miles of local streets that are maintained by the City of Lino Lakes. The older and more established neighborhoods experience a gradual aging and deterioration of the existing infrastructure, particularly the condition of the streets. As a result of this deterioration, maintenance costs grow every year. Eventually, it becomes more cost effective to replace the infrastructure rather than continue to maintain it. Several years ago, the City of Lino Lakes recognized the need to establish a Pavement Management and Street Reconstruction Program. The recently completed Pavement Management Report provides an inventory and condition assessment of the City's streets and identifies specific rehabilitation practices for specific streets at the most opportune time. In the Twin Cities area, the majority suburbs have adopted and practiced such a program for several years. The City of Lino Lakes has reached the stage where adoption of a systematic program to maintain our existing infrastructure is vital to maintaining property values. Accordingly, on May 9, 2005, the City Council accepted the Pavement Management Report and Financing Report, adopted the Pavement Management Policies, and established a Street Maintenance and Reconstruction Program. The Pavement Management Plan targeted West Shadow Lake Drive for proposed reconstruction. The OCI ratings for this street are below 43. This Project is part of the City's existing 5 -year Capitol Improvement Program. The decision- making process to authorize this Project consists of many steps including several public meetings and a referendum in accordance with the City Charter. This process and the steps are explained further within the context of this Report. Page 1 13849.005 II. PROCESS AND PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE A. Initiation of Project • Order Preparation of Shenandoah Feasibility Report B. Receive Shenandoah Feasibility Report / Call Public Hearing May 14, 2007 June 11, 2007 • Notice of hearing shall be published twice, at least one week apart, in the official newspaper of the City no less than two weeks prior to the date of hearing, and • A copy of the hearing, including estimated unit prices and the estimated total price, shall be mailed to each benefited property owner at least two weeks prior to the date of the hearing. C. Hold Neighborhood Meetings D. Public Hearing E. Petitioning Process June /July July 9, 2007 • Within 60 days after close of public hearing, the following petitions can be filed: (July 9, 2007 to September 6, 2007 = 60 Days) — A petition against improvement by either majority of property owners proposed to be assessed or if initiated by (1 a) at least equal to number petitioning for improvement under (1 a). Council can not make improvement at expense of benefited property owners. Council can not vote on same improvement for one year from public hearing. — If petition for improvement at least equal to (4ai), then Council can order improvement. F. Referendum Question at City Council September 10, 2007 • Must be submitted to Election Liaison by 5:00 p.m. September 11, 2007 • Must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2007, to Anoka County G. Election November 6, 2007 • Must hold an election within 120 days after close of public hearing (Note: July 9, 2007 to November 6, 2007 = 120 Days) Page 2 13849.005 H. Authorize Improvement Project & Preparation of Plans /Specifications December 2007 I. Hold Neighborhood Meetings Ongoing 2008 J. Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids Spring 2009 K. Accept Bids Spring 2009 L. Assessment Hearing Spring 2009 M. Start Construction Spring 2009 N. End Construction Fall 2009 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY West Shadow Lake Drive has had many repairs and overlays done over the years. It ranges in width from 21 feet near the channel crossing, to 26 feet in other areas, and is about 1.5 miles long. The Project includes Shadow Court and Sandpiper Lane. The street consists of three distinct sections. The southern section is straight and wider. It has undeveloped property, a park, and a school yard fronting on it. It has a rural cross - section; however some of the ditches are gone. The middle section is narrow and has wetlands and the channel abutting it. Soil borings show the underlying soils are poor and contain 15 -foot to 20 -foot deep sections of peat where the street crosses the channel. The road elevation near the channel is low, and the lake has overtopped the road in some years. It has a rural cross- section which is elevated from the surrounding land. Drainage is undefined in this area. There are many trees close to the street in this area. The northern section is residential and the street there is narrow. The street was initially a rural section street with ditches handling the drainage. Over the years many of the ditches have been filled to create front lawn areas. Because of the flat street grades in many areas, this filling has created drainage problems such as icing in the winter and standing water in the summer. The sandy nature of the soils has mitigated this problem somewhat. Currently, the street is not centered within the right -of -way, but rather meanders within it. Shadow Court and Sandpiper Lane are wider streets with bituminous curb. These streets have good grades, and drain towards West Shadow Lake Drive. Page 3 13849.005 Throughout this Project the existing pavement is in poor condition. The OCI pavement rating is between 18 and 43. The City of Lino Lakes pavement management policy goals are to keep the average rating of all streets at 70. Previous residential meetings have indicated a desire to reduce the speed of the traffic throughout the Project, and to address pedestrian safety. There is no City sewer or water service for this area. Included with this Report are cost estimates for constructing both utilities. IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The following proposed street and utility improvements are recommended. The proposed improvements are also illustrated further in the Appendix. A. STREETS AND DRAINAGE The goals for this street Project are to: • Develop a uniform street design • Meet the City's minimum 7 -ton design standard • Provide surface water treatment and infiltration • Provide a trail system • Install a sanitary sewer system • Install a public water supply system Soil borings were taken and a soils report was prepared for this Project. It is recommended to place two feet of select granular borrow on a compacted subgrade. There would then be 6- inches of Class V gravel base and 3.5 inches of bituminous pavement. A Wetland Delineation Report has been completed for this Project. The majority of the wetland impacts will occur in the section of the road by the culvert crossing in the middle of the Project. There will also be other minor areas of wetland impacts. Mitigation costs could be reduced by working with Anoka County to perform this work within the Golf Course area. Page 4 13849.005 1. Northern Section Street, Trail and Drainage Improvements In order to meet the first two goals stated above, staff is recommending that a 28 -foot wide (face of curb to face of curb) street be built with concrete curb and gutter. An 8.5 -foot trail would be placed on the west side of the street, approximately 6 feet behind the curb. The street is proposed to be centered in the right -of -way. This type of street takes up significantly Tess room than a similar width street with a rural cross section. The ditches on each side of the rural street would require a minimum of 20 feet of grading beyond the street in order to have standard ditches. Shadow Court and Sandpiper Lane are proposed to be built to match their existing width. A surmountable concrete curb and gutter is recommended to control runoff and provide a solid edge between the street and the lawns. Where ditches or low areas occur along this section of the street, the back of the curb would be lowered or flattened to allow surface water to drain into these areas, thus providing enhanced infiltration and water treatment. On this northern section of the street, we would recommend restricting parking to one side of the street. This will allow better emergency vehicle access than allowing parking on both sides of the street. It is recommended that a cul -de -sac be constructed on the north end of the street, and on the end of West Shadow Lake Court. An agreement with Anoka County Parks is needed to allow these. If a trail is desired along this section of roadway, we recommend placing it on the west side of the street. The typical trail would be 8.5 feet wide, and it would be located 6 feet behind the curb. In some areas this typical section may need to be modified to minimize tree Toss. Low retaining walls, right -of -way acquisition and grading easements may be required in order to build this trail. Tree loss would be mitigated by planting new trees. Page 5 13849.005 Drainage on this portion of the street will be handled by a conventional storm sewer system. Surface water treatment ponds would be required on the recreational shoreline Tots where the ditches currently discharge. Because of the flat grades, there may be a number of vane grates installed in the curb to collect runoff. Infiltration will be used to the maximum extent allowed. However, high groundwater may preclude the use of infiltration in some areas. 2. Middle Section Street, Trail and Drainage Improvements Because of the wetlands within this middle section of the roadway, we recommend a 28 -foot wide rural section road be built with 2 -foot wide gravel shoulders. The grade of the road should be raised to 2 feet above the 100 -year flood for separation from the lake surface. Some wetland filling will be necessary to accomplish this design. With the thick peat deposits near the channel crossing, special construction techniques are required to build this portion of the road. A thick section of fill would be placed over the peat. The peat will then be given time to consolidate and settle. During the time it is consolidating, a temporary gravel road can be placed on the fill. The fill is monitored, to check the consolidation rate and amount. When it appears the majority of the settlement is complete, the permanent street section is built. This process can take as long as a year or more to complete. The culvert in the channel would be replaced. The elevation and size of the pipe would remain the same in order not to change historic lake water levels. If a trail is desired along this section of roadway, we recommend placing it on the roadway as a 4 -foot wide shoulder. A separate trail will involve additional wetland mitigation and earthwork. A long bridge across the wetlands and channel could also be built, however the cost would be significantly higher than widening the shoulder of the street. Drainage on this portion of the street will be handled by roadside ditches. Infiltration will be used to the maximum extent allowed. However, high groundwater may preclude the use of infiltration in some areas. Page 6 13849.005 3. South Section Street, Trail and Drainage Improvements This section of the roadway has few driveways and is higher in elevation. Either a rural style street, as exists now, or an urban street with curb and gutter could be built. The advantage of the curb street is that the Toss of trees along the right - of -way would be less. The trees and the curb would tend to encourage drivers to slow down as they travel through this area. We recommend that an urban style street be built. If a trail is desired along this section of roadway, we recommend placing it on the west side of the street to provide continuity with the proposed trail to the north. Tree Toss will be mitigated by planting new tress. There will be a very small amount of wetland loss on this section of the road. Drainage on this portion of the street will be handled by a conventional storm sewer system. Surface water treatment ponds would be required on the north end of this section, before water discharges to the channel. B. SANITARY SEWER 1. Southem Section of West Shadow Lake Drive For the undeveloped property south of the creek we recommend a conventional gravity sanitary sewer system be built. An 8 -inch gravity sanitary sewer would be extended north from Birch Street past the park, and 4 -inch services would be extended to future lots. 2. Northern Section of West Shadow Lake Drive The area north of the creek does not have sanitary sewer service. Because of the high groundwater in the area and the proximity to the lake shore, abandonment of the septic systems in this neighborhood is encouraged. The most opportune time to install a sanitary sewer is with the Street Reconstruction Project. Because of the shallow elevation of near -by sanitary sewer mains, a gravity system to serve this area is not feasible for the entire Project. We considered two types of sewer systems for this area; a conventional gravity sanitary sewer Page 7 13849.005 system with a City -owned lift station, and a grinder pump system where each home is serviced by a small lift pump that discharges to a shared forcemain. 3. Conventional Sewer /Lift Station System a) A standard duplex lift station would be constructed near Shadow Court. An 8 -inch gravity sanitary sewer would be extended from there north and south to serve the residential and commercial property on the northern section of the road. Because of the length of the Project, and the flat grades, the lift station will be approximately 25 feet deep. Sewer depths will range from 10 to 20 feet below grade. High groundwater will make construction difficult, as extensive dewatering will be needed. With a sewer this deep, the entire right -of -way will be needed to contain the excavation. In many areas, soil will need to be removed from the excavation area, stockpiled, and hauled back. This process will be slow and very disruptive for the residents. b) The forcemain would be extended around the north end of the lake to Black Duck Drive. It is not recommended to extend it southward across the channel due to unstable soils. c) Each buildable lot would have a 4 -inch gravity sanitary sewer service. d) When the homeowners are ready to connect, they would be responsible for abandoning the existing septic system and extending the service into their home. Grinder Pump /Common Forcemain System In many areas where septic systems are being replaced and high groundwater is a significant cost factor, communities will have individual property owners install grinder pumps. These grinder pumps will then all discharge into a common forcemain. For this Project we would recommend constructing a 3 -inch HDPE forcemain with a discharge at Black Duck Drive. Each buildable lot would have a 1 -1/2 inch service stub for their pump to connect to. Page 8 13849.005 The forcemain would be at a 10 -foot depth. A few clean out manholes would be built for maintenance cleaning of the forcemain. When the residential property connects to the common forcemain they should anticipate a cost of $3,000 to $6,000 to install a grinder pump and abandon their existing septic system. This cost is very site - dependant, which is why it can vary widely. The type of grinder pump will also influence the cost. Generally grinder pumps are very dependable. A typical pump should give about 10 years of service. Pump replacement is generally not a complicated procedure. This type of system is recommended for this Project over the conventional lift station system. Cost estimates reflect the use of the Grinder Pump /Common Forcemain System. C. WATER City water does not exist in the Project area but the area is within the water system service area. The properties are now served with individual wells. Reconstruction of the street would provide the most opportune time to add watermain improvements to the properties in this area. A 12 -inch watermain is proposed from Birch Street, through the Project, around the north end of the lake, to Black Duck Drive. This will provide adequate fire protection for the project area. Fire hydrants would be installed along the entire route. Each buildable lot would have a 1 -inch service stubbed out for the property owner to connect. The section of watermain that passes through the channel area will need to be placed on piles. The soft soils and the filling of the roadway will make the foundation for this pipe very unstable. Piling will ensure a solid foundation for the pipe. Page 9 13849.005 V. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Included in the Appendix of this Report are detailed estimates of the construction costs for the Project. The costs are estimated based on recent construction projects in the Lino Lakes area and assume the installation of the improvements would begin in the summer of 2009. A summary of total estimated construction and project costs is listed as follows: Street and Drainage Watermain Sanitary Sewer Total Estimated Cost VI. EASEMENTS $ 3,439,000 $ 1,401,630 $ 742,370 $ 5,583,000 The majority of the street reconstruction and any utility construction activity are expected to be confined to the existing rights -of -way. Drainage easements will be needed for stormwater ponds that are constructed off of the road right -of -way. Temporary grading easements will be needed wherever grading is required on private property. Utility easements will be needed from Anoka County Parks for sewer and water extensions around the north end of the lake. A temporary road easement or other agreement will be required for temporary access to the north end of West Shadow Lake Drive during construction. It is anticipated that a temporary road through the golf course will be needed to maintain access for the residents. VII. PERMITS Permits will be required from various govemmental agencies as follows: Construction and Grading Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Permit) Work below the OHW Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Drainage Rice Creek Watershed District Page 10 13849.005 Street and Utility Connections Anoka County Watermain Construction Minnesota Department of Health Sanitary Sewer Construction Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Vlll. FINANCING AND ASSESSMENTS The streets identified for reconstruction are proposed to be funded by a combination of special assessments and general tax levies. Because a general tax levy is necessary to fund a portion of the costs associated with the improvements, the City must obtain voter approval prior to proceeding with such improvements. If authorization to proceed is granted by a referendum, it is expected that a portion of the improvement costs would be funded by the issuance of general obligation bonds with the debt service paid by a property tax levy. The remaining improvement costs would be funded by special assessments to the benefiting properties. The watermain extension and sanitary sewer costs would be assessed 100% to the benefiting properties in accordance with City policy. Assessments amounts would be consistent with the policies of the City of Lino Lakes and with the requirements of the City Charter and Minnesota State Law. However, property owners may within 60 days of the Public Hearing, petition against the Project. In accordance with the current City policy, street assessments (street and storm sewer) shall be assessed on the basis of a lot/unit assessment. For a single family area, the calculated assessment rate is the quotient of the one half of the total cost of the improvement divided by the total front footage for the improvement. This Calculated Assessment Rate (CAR) shall be compared to the Maximum Assessment Rate (MAR), and the lesser of the two shall be used. The current Maximum Assessment Rate for streets and drainage is $83.10 /Foot. This Project area is in the R -1X Zoning District, which would mean a 90 -foot wide lot size will be used to calculate the Lot/Unit Assessments. There is a small area zoned R -1 and Rural along the east side of West Shadow Lake Drive, just north of Birch Street. Page 11 13849.005 The Street/Storm Assessment Rates are calculated as shown below. Street/Drainage Total Street and Drainage Cost $ 3,439,000.00 Trail Credit $ (228,645.00) Total Front Frontage 16,741.00 Calculated Assesment Rate (CAR) $ 95.88 Maximum Assessment Rate (MAR) $ 83.10 Lot/Unit Assessment Rate ($ /Lot) $ 7,479.00 Total To Be Assessed $ 932,406.93 The total cost to install new utilities is assessed 100% to the benefiting properties as defined in Section XVII, Municipal Utilities in the Pavement Management Policies. The Forcemain Sanitary Sewer Assessment Rates are calculated as shown below. Forcemain Sanitary Sewer Constriction Cost $ 213,000.00 Unit Cost $ 232,650.00 Trull( Credit $ (18,500.00) Assessable Units 90 Lot/UnitAssessment Rate ($/Lot) $ 4,746.11 Total To Be Assessed $ 427,150.00 The Gravity Sanitary Sewer Assessment Rates are calculated as shown below. Gravity Sanitary Sewer Construction Cost $ 214,000.00 Unit Cost $ 82,720.00 Truk Credit $ Assessable Units 32 Lot/UnitAssessment Rate ($/Lot) $ 9,272.50 Total To Be Assessed $ 296,720.00 Unit Cost is the City Sanitary Sewer Unit Charge of $2,585.00. The Watermain Assessment Rates are calculated as shown below. Vvatemzain Constn. cfion Cost $ 985,000.00 Unit Cost $ 416,630.00 Tn.h Credit $ (182,100.00) Assessable Units 122 Lot/UnitAssessment Rate ($/Lot) $ 9,996.15 Total To Be Assessed $ 1,219,530.30 Unit Cost is the City Water Trunk Utility Unit Charge of $3,415.00. Page 12 13849.005 The funding for this Project is calculated as shown below. Project Funding Assessments $ 2,615,109.05 Assessments on Pi.blic Property $ 260,697.78 (Supported by Tax Levy) Trunk & Trail Credits $ 429,245.00 General Tax Levy $ 2,277,948.07 Total Project Cost $ 5,583,000.00 IX. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS As provided in this Report, West Shadow Lake Drive has been identified as a candidate for reconstruction in accordance with the City's Pavement Management Plan. In addition to stormwater and drainage improvements, the proposed Project also includes watermain, sanitary sewer, and trail improvements. The proposed improvements are considered necessary and feasible. It is recommended that the City of Lino Lakes proceed with the improvement process and schedule as described in this Report, This report represents an estimated statement of project costs based on a preliminary design using City standard specifications for public improvements. The purpose of the report is to provide the council and the general public with the probable costs of construction and a proposed assessment amount in accordance with City Charter and Minnesota Statutes. In the event that the project funding is allowed under City Charter provisions including approval in the general election a detailed final design process would be initiated. The final design process will include additional neighborhood input, design alternatives, and redefined cost estimates based on final design as directed by City Council. Page 13 13849.005 APPENDIX PROJECT LOCATION MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Rice Lake FftL1 BIRCH 1 - 1 h 1 / 1 o PROJECT LOCATIO\ 0 500 1000 SCALE IN FEET TKDA ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS PROJ. NO. 13406 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE PROJECT LOCATION MAP co I i is, , , 4,1,0 ; - : 6. L % /' 010 00944P ib 1-,N, 1 16" 10.... - . --. 0 4.41+■ .... ot.....its v,a, avo. Vtais OOP 0 vi, ii; 1----- ---1:- . • •484is i St% & , '•-•:(4.-:',..; ,--:: I , • e,;•••, : - .z.. -0, ,, • . 14 (03 "SW (C6: 6540 1' I. 638 BIRCH STREET WETLAND • -• •.:. 1:1,_:. 4- -i_f,,, p- 4 ' , VIAND 0 ''''--„, KILAND \----N,1 n a CC) DECO. EIL( WALL 7 PARK ,..,-, 1018. ..„. .-- --- ,•, `,.—Als__. ,7,: - •.: : : 6 ;,3. 6' x .—, A__ , _ ...., -- __•-:-...,--------___ ---...,- -.....„..,m1L. SEE BELOW SEE BELOW 4' \ " •""Te. ,L0 41.1 Tfl.,,ptAttl4t WETLAND / 29-31-22-13-0001 WEILAND • '" 8 1,2, 1)..13„14 11* etv r 0 PARK • 1 N. 13 6, a 7 2;- 41,:aaswitst5",..-LN, 0' 3 7.1.1_ _.... .........__.... — _ — ----=--- - - -,-- '---- -- --- ; ---..i.2 •0.. ,„ •,-...... %.:.) Ts, v.,.. 0 0 0 0 Q 0, tilizt.,0). 0. WETLAND _., N, ,.:• i - -,---- N'... :"■\\\, / .... ..................4---- ‘:\ 007 SEE EXHIBIT B 0 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT A TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS PROJECT NO. 13406.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE EXISTING CONDITIONS 1- w 6" ....„„ 4.52. • ..........:',..,1,44....„.._STP 12- 1,t) , _ 'it, .......... .....,.. ••••■... -", .1., '004. 1 4.4, ''' . .."'"•••■...L...."..% s'•••••:'-::.: '-•-.... I.,,.... ••......, le 41)C.4' 0 • ........ ••■".. • , z - ▪ 4" -06 4:10,4•0 6759 0'-' • _ • • 4' \ 2 .• --- 24- ost Ow" 0.„ 9 ,,rtf 1 1 24" (:)*4--• - " --- _ — — / • I 6779 6779 7.:D737C7c..- 04" 0.4fi 2 " 51 "19 ..................................... 6770 29-31-22-11-0005 6710 SEE BELOW SEE ABOVE •••• • -› 15. 0_ N. 031,, 991y-, * 0 00- ■?' ... 4 8.3 0 3 6832 4.1W-49-1V-8 ... Rs* 6844 ... ....... . _ 6889 .. _ ,-.-- 0. ..... 7- ■•• . 124 12 ...... _ _ BIT. SURFACE 20-31-22-44-0013 I IP 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 150 0 1- w Ld cn EXHIBIT B TKDA ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS PROJECT NO. 13406.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE EXISTING CONDITIONS 1— mw w w SEE BELOW 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 150 1015 7021 SF \ 1V „" \t \ \ _ \ V --- 7027 7 SEE ABOVE TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS W A okP• 06.\ 7026 EXIIIBIT C PROJECT NO. 13406.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE EXISTING CONDITIONS co A352 52* 6 Ft, 638 BIRCH STREET , wE T-) TL AN D H? • • CA It .„ cy) • • • PARK SEE BELOW SEE ABOVE 29-31-22-13-0001 SEE EXHIBIT E TKDA ENGINEERS.ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS PROJECT N0. 13406.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 0 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE PROPOSED SANITARY & WATER b /39 r 6" 0 SIP to.■ • 1'1 c,3- a. /Z.t. STP 6729 mar 0 6709 0 ----- 2- is. 4.t'6"4.• 0 0 - 3 0 7 'APB 73 iv ifikAlglirgia 11:1 *jossomiNg 10" 0 10" 2. 24' r. • 24" 18" _ - Er:J(177—W " 2 -- - - - - • ••••••• • • ••••••• • ---- 3 HOPE _FM _ _____ gr. 2-14 4)15 '9 111 or ARTA 00.flivo-12- 0 29-31-22-11-0005 0 SEE BELOW N9 613 LyezA 0 0,0 ''Ef)1W r■ 24" .3741iFFFIV • ..ma • ••■• • • • • 0 0 ( — • ••-- _____ ---Tr-HDPE -FM - . . *'113 ( 2, ; 1 0 1 36- 12" 0 - 0 I 0 02-2" .0/01 0-0 4,)2 04" TEL at' 10' -111 44' 01 6889 2" • • • • • • • • — • — -r-tr ----____ 1 E:(113000# 01.0 se 6832 6844 90 0 TKDA ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS KE 0 •I . .1._ I . . . . 26" ____ 3= FOPE-Ftota 1 20-31-22-44-0013 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 150 EXHIBIT E PROJECT N0. 13406.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE PROPOSED SANITARY & WATER w r m_ x w w NOTE: FUTURE LOOPING OF CITY WATERMAIN SYSTEM TO NORTHWEST 16" D.P. WM 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET CY 0 CO O0 UU 3" HDPE FM o a� X16' D.I.P• W 5 �D \ IA 74 10°6 �2+ .1 7026 4x2 SEE ABOVE NOTE: 12" D.I.P. WATERMAIN & 3" HDPE SANITARY FORCEMAIN CONNECTION MADE AT NORTH END OF BLACK DUCK DRIVE TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • Li J w VI EXHIBIT F PROJECT NO. 13406.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE PROPOSED SANITARY & WATER w R/W 60' 14' 16' 16' 14' R/W 4' A.� Attfre MAX. SLOPE 3:1 MIN. SLOPE 2.0X 16, 1 Y ; 3 - j J iri%ax..,(� 7 1•' 0Y 7 C} 8Y', C �-t1,$� �'� 2350 TYPE LV 4 BIT. WEARING COURSE —TACK COAT 2" -2350 TYPE LV 2 OR 3 BIT. 6014- WEARING COURSE 5" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE) 24' SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 1YP$CAL SECTION (RURAL STREET /PERMANENT SECTION) rTner 8 L Y T 4' q• 638 BIRCH STREET WETLAND A o I C s r j 4; x > N j RQ I 9 r � N co o R/W 60' R/W 7.75' 6.5' TRNL 15' 7.75' 2.0X 4" TOPSOIL & SOD ..iii11110•i.: 2.0% WAS. SL -2" -2350 TYPE LV 4 BIT. WEARING COURSE —6" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE) ry• D412 CONC. CURB & GUTTER -1.5' -2350 TYPE LV 4 BR. WEARING COURSE — TACK COAT 2' -2350 TYPz LV 2 OR 3 BIT. NON - WEARING COURSE 5" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE) 24" SELECT TRANULAR BORROW MC& SECTION (URBAN STREET /PERMANENT SECTION) 8.8" 11. 15' /5• 18• 8" S. S. 3' 5.6.3.3'$ q,5. 4' -T4 • 0-T6v 15, tic .1' .� q.q.q•3^ ' J WETLA D 0 WETLAND `\ PARK SEE BELOW SEE ABOVE 29- 31 -22 -13 -0001 WETLAND, , 1p. q" >• 3' 8, 15' 10' 12 ,10.15* 6, 77 7 •?'6.4 ° ?�q. 1pQt 1s QZ »/o .•Y 3� ta sA 1p, 1 6,8 6" w 7 `.5:�• -� -' "\ WETLAND 1 •'ii��p; _ '�'tleWhoimYYF .RF4W 70.. - s s • BEGIN 8' STRIPED ON- STREET TRAIL 30 WETLAND PARK SEE EXHIBIT H 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT G TKDA ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS PROJECT NO. 13406.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE PROPOSED STREET & STORM 0 7- uJ m 12' 000,, S TP 4 ST p 2, '2' END 8' STRIPED ON-STREET TRAIL 000, / '0 12" 1-4-8„ 24 12" / /0 2 24" .2-106 L‹. /•C 0-10" 2"X /-•• ) 24T.) 4- 6 C6)2" \‘; • • ./ 6 10 ,2„ 1D_14"1/3" 36" 30" 0 0 -sr-77 EDGE 00 ic 05-3-12:3- ja" 0 24" 24" 34" r 0. " 2k) 010" 2-1e GE 29-31-22-11-0005 DE SEE BELOW LA 0 m LA 24' •„/;" `••,:").\2"6 0 (../ • 40 DIA (;) 4" -ri. TEC .."20" SI,: 1 (r> tN1%,111CM1.12 te,e6;1;3 0 0 -0-- 4 CI 0 0 0 48" 24"C, .4143;- ",/ 15" 0° oi ' x;) *4` 6889 TEL io'tyye EDC " .„ (>10" E'",•75" 20-31-22-44-0013 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 150 TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS PROJECT NO. 13406.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 69( EXHIBIT FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE PROPOSED STREET & STORM :``,, ;F4 14" N 6`�1�� —i l� s 0 6889 691 2- 0 03 -- .. 2 -12- 70 J u>r 6925 6961 -6967 0 0 �8r/ / 0 03 18" 2 - -15" tw 18\ 24 °30" 8.. 6.. 02Y' 030' (l7 r 2 -12^ 1 11 1/4,24" I 7y g 12 "/ b_ 0 z75 ♦ 6" 11111::111:1 , .: .: .: .. ... ...: .: .r.� :� :; : ^.:v:� �: :,F,, 7 \ \ 024" 4I� 0e. 6922 6940 6946 6928 —27 6964 }5 6y"'1 2- n 10 2\ 0006, 6976 6982 6988 SEE BELOW 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 150 10' 2" Oo �1- 22,23, I OlF 0 0 0 SEE ABOVE TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS u�2 ,21 16L�J 2. / p06 \u/ -;f , y/ / 1026 \7,, / / \000 \ EXHIBIT I PROJECT NO. 13406.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 8, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE PROPOSED STREET & STORM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE (WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE, SHADOW COURT, AND SANDPIPER DRIVE) PROBABLE STREET AND DRAINAGE COSTS Length: 8,500 Feet, Width: 30 Feet (Back To Back June 11, 2007 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE EXTENSION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 1 MOBILIZATION LS 0.7 $40,000.00 $28,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 CLEAR TREES EA 299 $100.00 $29,900.00 4 GRUB TREES EA 313 $50.00 $15,650.00 7 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 33,300 $10.00 $333,000.00 9 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 2000 $10.00 $20,000.00 11 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW C.V. CY 22,500 $15.00 $337,500.00 12 COMMON BORROW CY 3,200 $8.00 $25,600.00 13 REMOVE AND REINSTALL MAILBOXES /SIGNS LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 14 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY (ALL THICKNESSES) SY 1400 $3.50 $4,900.00 15 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY (ALL THICKNESSES) SY 600 $6.00 $3,600.00 16 REMOVE BIT. PAVEMENT (ALL THICKNESSES) SY 22,616 $2.50 $56,540.00 17 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS LF 800 $2.50 $2,000.00 18 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL PER M 100 $20.00 $2,000.00 19 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 87.5 $280.00 $24,500.00 20 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 11,200 $15.00 $168,000.00 21 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 FOR TRAIL TON 2,723 $16.00 $43,568.00 22 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 FOR ACCESS ROAD TON 675 $15.00 $10,125.00 23 TEMPORARY PAVING TON 800 $38.00 $30,400.00 24 WEAR COURSE MIX (1 - 1/2 ") TON 2,600 $55.00 $143,000.00 25 WEAR COURSE MIX (2") FOR TRAIL TON 823 $57.00 $46,911.00 26 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK GAL 1,400 $2.50 $3,500.00 27 BASE COURSE MIX (2 ") TON 3,400 $52.00 $176,800.00 28 B -618 CURB AND GUTTER LF 600 $12.00 $7,200.00 29 D-412 CURB AND GUTTER LF 15,050 $10.00 $150,500.00 30 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 600 $42.00 $25,200.00 31 4" CONCRETE WALK (PED RAMPS) SF 448 $6.00 $2,688.00 32 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PATCH SY 1400 $18.00 $25,200.00 33 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SF 1500 $22.00 $33,000.00 34 SOD WITH 4" TOP SOIL SY 12,500 $5.00 $62,500.00 36 SEEDING AC 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 37 SALVAGE OF SIGNS LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 38 ADJUST MANHOLE COVER/CASTING EA 1 $450.00 $450.00 39 PERFORATED DRAIN TILE LS 500 $10.00 $5,000.00 40 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 SUBTOTAL STREET CONSTRUCTION $1,835,232.00 DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION 1 MOBILIZATION LS 0.1 $40,000.00 $4,000.00 2 DEWATERING FOR STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 3 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 4 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE BEDDING TON 100 $8.00 $800.00 5 REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE LF 750 $12.00 $9,000.00 6 POND EXCAVATION CY 3000 $10.00 $30,000.00 7 24" RCP CLASS V STORM SEWER LF 4990 $38.00 $189,620.00 8 10' x 5' BOX CULVERT LF 50 $500.00 $25,000.00 9 24" FES EA 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 10 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE EA 40 $2,000.00 $80,000.00 11 POND OUTLET EA 7 $5,000.00 $35,000.00 12 RIP RAP CY 140 $70.00 $9,800.00 13 EASEMENTS LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 14 PERMITS LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 SUBTOTAL DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION $480,720.00 TOTAL CONTINGENCIES (10 %) SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMINISTRATION (35 %) $2,315,952.00 $231,595.20 $2,547,547.20 $891,452.80 TOTAL STREET AND STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 3,439 000.00' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 June 11, 2007 WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE (WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE, SHADOW COURT, AND SANDPIPER DRIVE) PROBABLE WATERMAIN COST Length: 10,480 Feet ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE EXTENSION WATERMAIN 1 MOBILIZATION LS 0.1 $40,000.00 $4,000.00 2 DEWATERING FOR WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 4 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE BEDDING TON 400 $8.00 $3,200.00 5 CONNECT TO EXISITING WATERMAIN EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 6 WOOD PILING LF 1360 $21.00 $28,560.00 7 PILE CAPS CY 90 $400.00 $36,000.00 8 6" DIP WATERMAIN LF 190 $28.00 $5,320.00 9 8" DIP WATERMAIN LF 300 $32.00 $9,600.00 10 12" DIP WATERMAIN LF 9510 $40.00 $380,400.00 11 16" DIP WATERMAIN LF 900 $48.00 $43,200.00 12 8" GATE VALVE EA 1 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 13 12" GATE VALVE EA 10 $2,200.00 $22,000.00 14 16" GATE VALVE EA 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 15 HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE EA 19 $2,500.00 $47,500.00 16 1" CORPORATION STOP EA 67 $150.00 $10,050.00 17 1" CURB STOP EA 67 $150.00 $10,050.00 18 1" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE LF 2100 $14.00 $29,400.00 19 BITUMINOUS RESTORATION SY 70 $19.00 $1,330.00 TOTAL $663,010.00 CONTINGENCIES (10 %) SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMINISTRATION (35 %) $66,301 00 $729,311.00 $255,689.00 TOTAL WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTI ©N $985,009.x'. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 June 11, 2007 WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE (WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE, SHADOW COURT, AND SANDPIPER DRIVE) PROBABLE FORCEMAIN SANITARY SEWER COST Length: 7,005 Feet ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE EXTENSION SANITARY SEWER 1 MOBILIZATION LS 0.1 $40,000.00 $4,000.00 2 DEWATERING FOR SANITARY CONSTRUCTION LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 4 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE BEDDING TON 400 $8.00 $3,200.00 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 6 3" HDPE (SDR17) FORCEMAIN LF 6500 $12.00 $78,000.00 7 1.5" HDPE (SDR 17) SERVICE PIPE LF 2100 $10.00 $21,000.00 8 1" CURB STOP EA 66 $150.00 $9,900.00 9 AIR RELEASE MANHOLE EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 10 CLEANOUT MANHOLE EA 4 $1,500.00 $6,000.00 TOTAL $143,600.00 CONTINGENCIES (10 %) SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMINISTRATION (35 %) $14,360.00 $157,960.00 $55,040.00 .: TOTAL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION MN June 11, 2007 WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE (WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE, SHADOW COURT, AND SANDPIPER DRIVE) PROBABLE GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER COST Length: 2,050 Feet ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE EXTENSION SANITARY SEWER 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 2 DEWATERING FOR SANITARY CONSTRUCTION LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 8" PVC SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (0' -8' DEEP) LF 410 $30.00 $12,300.00 4 8" PVC SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (8' -10' DEEP) LF 410 $35.00 $14,350.00 5 8" PVC SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (10' -12' DEEP) LF 410 $40.00 $16,400.00 6 8" PVC SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (12' -14' DEEP) LF 410 $45.00 $18,450.00 7 8" PVC SDR 35 SAN. SEW. (14' -16' DEEP) LF 410 $50.00 $20,500.00 8 8" DIP OUTSIDE DROP LF 8 $350.00 $2,800.00 9 4' DIA. MANHOLE EA 6 $2,000.00 $12,000.00 10 EXTRA DEPTH OF MANHOLE LF 26 $100.00 $2,600.00 11 TRENCH STABILIZATION ROCK LF 500 $5.00 $2,500.00 12 4" ON 8" SDR 35 WYE BRANCH EA 32 $100.00 $3,200.00 13 4" PVC SCH. 40 SERVICE PIPE LF 960 $25.00 $24,000.00 TOTAL $144,100.00 CONTINGENCIES (10 %) SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMINISTRATION (35 %) $14,410.00 $158,510.00 $55,490.00 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION $214,000.00' PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL June 11, 2007 FEASIBILITY REPORT WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 13849.005 PIN OWNER STREET SANITARY WATER FRONT ADDRESS UNIT UNIT UNIT FOOTAGE SANITARY STREET & SEWER WATERMAIN SANITARY DRAINAGE FRONT FRONT SEWER WATERMAIN ASSESSMENT FOOTAGE FOOTAGE UNIT CHARGE UNIT CHARGE TOTAL ASSESSMENT 20- 31 -22 -14 -0012 20 -31 -22-41 -0010 20 -31 -22-41 -0011 20 -31 -22-41 -0012 20 -31 -22-41 -0013 20 -31 -22-41 -0014 20 -31 -22-41 -0015 20 -31 -22-41 -0016 20 -31 -22-41 -0017 20 -31 -22-41 -0018 20 -31 -22-44 -0001 20 -31 -22-44 -0002 20 -31 -22-44 -0003 20 -31 -22-44 -0004 20 -31 -22-44 -0005 20 -31 -22-44 -0006 20 -31 -22-44 -0007 20 -31 -22-44 -0008 20 -31 -22-44 -0009 20 -31 -22-44 -0010 20 -31 -22-44 -0011 20 -31 -22-44 -0012 20 -31 -22-44 -0013 21- 31 -22 -23 -0002 21- 31 -22 -23 -0003 21- 31 -22 -23 -0005 21- 31 -22 -23 -0006 21- 31 -22 -23 -0007 21- 31 -22 -23 -0008 21- 31 -22 -23 -0009 21- 31 -22 -23 -0010 21- 31 -22 -23 -0011 21- 31 -22 -23 -0012 21- 31 -22 -23 -0014 21- 31 -22 -23 -0015 21- 31 -22 -23 -0016 21- 31 -22 -32 -0001 21- 31 -22 -32 -0002 21- 31 -22 -32 -0003 21- 31 -22 -32 -0004 21- 31 -22 -32 -0005 21- 31 -22 -32 -0006 21- 31 -22 -32 -0007 21- 31 -22 -32 -0008 21- 31 -22 -32 -0009 21- 31 -22 -32 -0010 21- 31 -22 -32 -0011 Marshall, Craig D. & Rebecca Lynner, Terry Adams, Timothy J. & Stephanie J. Nugent, Randy J. & Christine Menard, Jennifer Schultz, WM. J. & Dawn M. Harmon, Jason & Heidi Laplante, Jason D. & Krisit K. Bina, Benjamin K. & Nobisch A. M. McQuillan, Colin M. Sever, John M. Metzmaker, Michael, J. & Leeann K. Lindberg, Philip O. & Julie R. Johnson, Donald R. & Kathryn Murawski, Curt E. Mackie, Jeffrey R. Bohlen, Donald J. Stern, James M. & Sheryl L. Jolicoeur, Terrill R. & J.A. Kieger, William J. Erickson, Mary Ellen Erickson, Bradley R. & J. L. Lund, Robert C. & Margaret R. Anoka County Anoka County Golf Course Bridges, Dennis J. & Teri E. H. Mohr, Blake W. & Kathleen A. Ronnebert, Kevin R. Canniff, James M. & Christine M. McDermott, Patrick & Karen Mohr, Blake W. & Kathleen A. Dishneau, Ronald J. & Colleen E. O'Toole, Sharon & Penn, Margaret Bergeson, John & Diane Kulsrud, David Scott Puskas, Charles B. & Susan E. Meyer, Joseph H. & Debra J. Perry, Daniel M. & Pamela K. Sweney, Steven M. Sweney, Jessie J. Sweney, Jessie J. Parker, Jerome M. & Patricia A. Schultz, William J. & Dawn M. MN State of Trust Kulsrud, David Scott MN State of Trust 656 Sandpiper Drive 655 Shadow Court 656 Shadow Court 6937 West Shadow Lake Drive 6925 West Shadow Lake Drive 6913 West Shadow Lake Drive 6901 West Shadow Lake Drive 6889 West Shadow Lake Drive 6963 West Shadow Lake Drive 6961 West Shadow Lake Drive 6892 West Shadow Lake Drive 6879 West Shadow Lake Drive 6867 West Shadow Lake Drive 6855 West Shadow Lake Drive 6843 West Shadow Lake Drive 6829 West Shadow Lake Drive 6819 West Shadow Lake Drive 6820 West Shadow Lake Drive 6832 West Shadow Lake Drive 6844 West Shadow Lake Drive 6856 West Shadow Lake Drive 6868 West Shadow Lake Drive 9319 Riverview S., Bloomington No Address Available 7000 West Shadow Lake Drive No Address Available 7015 West Shadow Lake Drive 7021 West Shadow Lake Drive 7027 West Shadow Lake Drive 7033 West Shadow Lake Drive 7026 West Shadow Lake Drive 7021 West Shadow Lake Drive 7006 West Shadow Lake Drive 7002 West Shadow Lake Drive 6996 West Shadow Lake Drive 6999 West Shadow Lake Drive 6994 West Shadow Lake Drive 6988 West Shadow Lake Drive 6982 West Shadow Lake Drive 6976 West Shadow Lake Drive No Address Available 6964 West Shadow Lake Drive 6958 West Shadow Lake Drive 6913 West Shadow Lake Drive Anoka County Property Tax 6999 West Shadow Lake Drive Anoka County Property Tax 1 1 1 155.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 82.53 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 110.59 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 431.66 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 150.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 163.76 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 155.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 150.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 43.75 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 43.75 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 85.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 2 2 2 180.68 $14,958.00 $4,322.22 $13,162.30 $5,170.00 $6,830.00 $44,442.52 2 2 2 238.04 $14,958.00 $4,322.22 $13,162.30 $5,170.00 $6,830.00 $44,442.52 2 2 2 240.75 $14,958.00 $4,322.22 $13,162.30 $5,170.00 $6,830.00 $44,442.52 3 3 3 297.38 $22,437.00 $6,483.33 $19,743.45 $7,755.00 $10,245.00 $66,663.78 3 3 3 288.49 $22,437.00 $6,483.33 $19,743.45 $7,755.00 $10,245.00 $66,663.78 2 2 2 187.22 $14,958.00 $4,322.22 $13,162.30 $5,170.00 $6,830.00 $44,442.52 2 2 2 279.92 $14,958.00 $4,322.22 $13,162.30 $5,170.00 $6,830.00 $44,442.52 2 2 2 236.17 $14,958.00 $4,322.22 $13,162.30 $5,170.00 $6,830.00 $44,442.52 2 2 2 226.44 $14,958.00 $4,322.22 $13,162.30 $5,170.00 $6,830.00 $44,442.52 2 2 2 223.71 $14,958.00 $4,322.22 $13,162.30 $5,170.00 $6,830.00 $44,442.52 2 2 2 253.37 $14,958.00 $4,322.22 $13,162.30 $5,170.00 $6,830.00 $44,442.52 1 1 1 140.69 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 0 0 0 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 1 1 90.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 2 3 3 180.00 $14,958.00 $6,483.33 $19,743.45 $7,755.00 $10,245.00 $59,184.78 1 1 1 233.07 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 80.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 80.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 80.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 104.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 110.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 92.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 104.48 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 102.00 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 292.48 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 78.50 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 78.50 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 78.50 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 78.41 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 92.01 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 94.82 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 1 1 1 94.82 $7,479.00 $2,161.11 $6,581.15 $2,585.00 $3,415.00 $22,221.26 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 $127.12 $387.13 $152.06 $200.88 $1,307.13 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 $127.12 $387.13 $152.06 $200.88 $1,307.13 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 $127.12 $387.13 $152.06 $200.88 $1,307.13 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 $127.12 $387.13 $152.06 $200.88 $1,307.13 PIN 21- 31 -22 -32 -0012 21- 31 -22 -32 -0013 21- 31 -22 -32 -0014 21- 31 -22 -32 -0015 21- 31 -22 -32 -0016 21- 31 -22 -32 -0017 21- 31 -22 -32 -0018 21- 31 -22 -32 -0019 21- 31 -22 -32 -0020 21- 31 -22 -32 -0021 21- 31 -22 -32 -0022 21- 31 -22 -32 -0023 21- 31 -22 -32 -0024 21- 31 -22 -32 -0025 21- 31 -22 -32 -0026 21- 31 -22 -32 -0027 21- 31 -22 -32 -0028 21- 31 -22 -32 -0029 21- 31 -22 -32 -0030 21- 31 -22 -32 -0031 21- 31 -22 -32 -0032 21- 31 -22 -32 -0033 21- 31 -22 -32 -0034 21- 31 -22 -32 -0035 21- 31 -22 -33 -0001 21- 31 -22 -33 -0002 26 -31 -22-42 -0003 29- 31 -22 -11 -0002 29- 31 -22 -11 -0003 29- 31 -22 -11 -0004 29- 31 -22 -11 -0005 29- 31 -22 -11 -0006 29- 31 -22 -11 -0007 29- 31 -22 -11 -0008 29- 31 -22 -11 -0009 29- 31 -22 -11 -0010 29- 31 -22 -11 -0011 29- 31 -22 -11 -0012 29- 31 -22 -12 -0004 29- 31 -22 -13 -0001 29- 31 -22 -13 -0003 29- 31 -22 -13 -0005 29 -31 -22-42 -0001 29 -31 -22-42 -0002 29 -31 -22-42 -0004 OWNER Trehus, Michael J. Schumacher, Richard W. Adams, Timothy J. & Stephanie J. Nugent, Randy J. & Christine Laplante, Jason D. & Krisit K. Metzmaker, Michael, J. & Leeann K. MN State of Trust MN State of Trust Murawski, Curt E. Mackie, Jeffrey R. Bohlen, Donald J. Menard, Jennifer Harmon, Heidi Nelson, Gary M. & Sally Brandenburger, Larry & Jane Singer, Irvin L. & Judith A. Singer, Irvin L. Smith, Patrick C. & Debra P. Olson, Gregory & Kim M. Kuik, Timothy & Roberta Henderson, Timothy M. & Kristen Trehus, Michael J. Bradley, Margaret K. Schultz, Lori A. Swenson, John A. Fossey, Brian W. & Kim S. Tufts, Mark J. & Patricia C. Poehling, Jerome J. & Mona Gotwald, Michael P. & Pamela Traver, Thomas J. & Roxanne R. Petersen, Terry D. & Sharon M. Gotwald, George & Marion L. Bretoi, Christopher L. & Marilyn Kinghorn, Curtis D. & Audrey M. Burggraff, Kevin James Roberts, Marilynne K. Rammer, Mark A. & Debra K. Anderson, Jonathan Paul Gotwald, George & Marion L. McClellan, John R. & Judith A. City of Lino Lakes Gotwald, George & Marion L. Independent School District City of Lino Lakes Barry, Patrick J. & Patricia ADDRESS 675 Shadow Court 655 Shadow Court 656 Shadow Court 6937 West Shadow Lake Drive 6889 West Shadow Lake Drive 6879 West Shadow Lake Drive Anoka County Property Tax Anoka County Property Tax 6843 West Shadow Lake Drive 6829 West Shadow Lake Drive 6819 West Shadow Lake Drive 6925 West Shadow Lake Drive 6901 West Shadow Lake Drive 6946 West Shadow Lake Drive 6940 West Shadow Lake Drive No Address Available 6928 West Shadow Lake Drive 6922 West Shadow Lake Drive 6916 West Shadow Lake Drive 6910 West Shadow Lake Drive 6987 West Shadow Lake Drive 675 Shadow Court 6967 West Shadow Lake Drive 6965 West Shadow Lake Drive 6904 West Shadow Lake Drive 6900 West Shadow Lake Drive 6540 West Shadow Lake Drive 6790 West Shadow Lake Drive 6770 West Shadow Lake Drive 6750 West Shadow Lake Drive 6730 West Shadow Lake Drive 6710 West Shadow Lake Drive 6779 West Shadow Lake Drive 6769 West Shadow Lake Drive 6759 West Shadow Lake Drive 6749 West Shadow Lake Drive 6729 West Shadow Lake Drive 6709 West Shadow Lake Drive No Address Available No Address Available Northerly Park Lot 6710 West Shadow Lake Drive 638 Birch St Southerly Park Lot 6508 West Shadow Lake Drive STREET & STREET SANITARY WATER FRONT DRAINAGE UNIT UNIT UNIT FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 0.059 0.059 0.059 5.00 $439.94 1 1 1 85.00 $7,479.00 1 1 1 84.62 $7,479.00 1 1 1 81.33 $7,479.00 1 1 1 81.33 $7,479.00 1 1 1 81.33 $7,479.00 1 1 1 81.33 $7,479.00 1 1 1 85.00 $7,479.00 1 1 1 194.37 $7,479.00 2 2 2 500.62 $14,958.00 1 1 1 43.75 $7,479.00 1 1 1 43.75 $7,479.00 1 1 1 85.00 $7,479.00 1 1 1 85.00 $7,479.00 5 5 5 497.00 $37,395.00 2 2 2 210.03 $14,958.00 2 2 2 245.00 $14,958.00 2 2 2 229.14 $14,958.00 2 2 2 215.00 $14,958.00 2 2 2 215.00 $14,958.00 1 1 1 221.17 $7,479.00 1 1 1 165.00 $7,479.00 1 1 1 160.00 $7,479.00 1 1 1 152.16 $7,479.00 1 1 1 175.00 $7,479.00 1 1 1 293.35 $7,479.00 0 0 0 952.31 $0.00 7 7 7 975.52 $52,353.00 3.67 1 1 1126.26 $27,447.93 2 2 2 755.86 $14,958.00 11 11 11 1262.64 $82,269.00 8 8 8 662.69 $59,832.00 1 0 0 103.00 $7,479.00 SANITARY $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $127.12 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $4,322.22 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $33,437.50 $4,322.22 $4,322.22 $4,322.22 $4,322.22 $4,322.22 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $2,161.11 $0.00 $46,812.50 $6,687.50 $4,322.22 $73,562.50 $53,500.00 $0.00 SEWER WATERMAIN FRONT FRONT FOOTAGE FOOTAGE $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $387.13 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $13,162.30 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $32,905.75 $13,162.30 $13,162.30 $13,162.30 $13,162.30 $13,162.30 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $6,581.15 $0.00 $46,068.05 $6,581.15 $13,162.30 $72,392.65 $52,649.20 $0.00 SANITARY SEWER UNIT CHARGE $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $152.06 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $5,170.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $12,925.00 $5,170.00 $5,170.00 $5,170.00 $5,170.00 $5,170.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $2,585.00 $0.00 $18,095.00 $2,585.00 $5,170.00 $28,435.00 $20,680.00 $0.00 WATERMAI N UNIT CHARGE $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $200.88 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $6,830.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $17,075.00 $6,830.00 $6,830.00 $6,830.00 $6,830.00 $6,830.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $3,415.00 $0.00 $23,905.00 $3,415.00 $6,830.00 $37,565.00 $27,320.00 $0.00 June 11, 2007 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $1,307.13 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $44,442.52 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $133,738.25 $44,442.52 $44,442.52 $44,442.52 $44,442.52 $44,442.52 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $22,221.26 $0.00 $187,233.55 $46,716.58 $44,442.52 $294,224.15 $213,981.20 $7,479.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 124.67 122.00 122.00 16741.06 $932,406.93 $408,499.90 $802,900.30 $315,370.00 $416,630.00 $2,875,807.13 • AGENDA ITEM 6D STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 TOPIC: Resolution No. 07 -85, Accepting Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing, Shenandoah Area Street, Storm Sewer, and Watermain Improvement Project. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes currently has approximately 100 of local streets. On May 14, 2007 City Council authorized the revision of Shenandoah Area Feasibility study. As the City of Lino Lakes ages, the need for reconstruction of local streets becomes a greater priority. Streets that are in poor condition or have storm drainage problems substantially increase city maintenance costs. The Shenandoah Area Improvement project will be funded by a combination of special assessments, Trunk Unit Funds, and general tax levies. The feasibility study, ordered by the City Council, has been completed. The next step in the process will be to accept the feasibility study and hold a Public Hearing on July 9th for the proposed improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Resolution No. 07 -85 Accepting Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing, Shenandoah Area Street, Storm Sewer, and Watermain Improvement Project. Council Member moved for adoption of the following ordinance: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 07- 85 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING — SHENANDOAH STREET, STORM SEWER, AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted May 14, 2007, a study has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to Shenandoah Area Improvement Project for Rice Court from Totem Trail to cul -de -sac, Hokah Court from Hokah Drive to cul -de -sac, Hokah Drive from Totem Trail to Birch Street, Totem Trail from Arrowhead Drive to Birch Street, Arrowhead Drive from Ware Road to 550 feet East of Totem Trail by constructing street, storm sewer, watermain, and this report was received by the Council on June 11, 2007, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota States, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer is designated as the engineer for this improvement and he is directed to call for a public hearing for the Shenandoah Area Street, Storm Sewer, and Watermain Improvement project. 2. The Council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $2,156,635.00. 3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 9th day of July, 2007 in the Council chambers of the City Hall at 6:30 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 11th day of June, 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. ol- v TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA JUNE 3, 2005 REVISED JUNE 11, 2007 FEASIBILITY REPORT SHENANDOAH AREA STREET, STORM SEWER, AND WATERMAIN CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 13849.004 I hereby certify that this Feasibility Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Lorne G. Wikstrom, P.E. License No. 23905 13849.004 FEASIBILITY REPORT SHENANDOAH AREA STREET, STORM SEWER, AND WATERMAIN CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. I. INTRODUCTION - GENERAL 1 II. PROCESS AND PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE 2 III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 3 IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY 4 V. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS 7 VI. EASEMENTS 7 VII. PERMITS 7 VIII. FINANCING AND PROJECT ASSESSMENTS 8 IX. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 APPENDIX NO. OF PAGES PROJECT LOCATION MAP 1 EXHIBIT A - B: EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 EXHIBIT C - D: PROPOSED WATERMAIN 2 EXHIBIT E - F: STREET RECONSTRUCTION 2 PROBABLE STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND STORM SEWER COSTS 1 PROBABLE WATERMAIN COSTS 1 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2 ii 13849.004 FEASIBILITY REPORT STREET, STORM SEWER, AND WATERMAIN SHENANDOAH AREA CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA I. INTRODUCTION - GENERAL The City Council authorized this updated Feasibility Report on May 14, 2007. The original report was prepared on June 3, 2005. There are approximately 100 miles of local streets that are maintained by the City of Lino Lakes. The older and more established neighborhoods experience a gradual aging and deterioration of the existing infrastructure, particularly the condition of the streets. As a result of this deterioration, maintenance costs grow every year. Eventually, it becomes more cost effective to replace the infrastructure rather than continue to maintain it. Several years ago, the City of Lino Lakes recognized the need to establish a Pavement Management and Street Reconstruction Program. The recently completed Pavement Management Report provides an inventory and condition assessment of the City's streets and identifies specific rehabilitation practices for specific streets at the most opportune time. In the Twin Cities area, the majority of suburbs have adopted and practiced such a program for several years. The City of Lino Lakes has reached the stage where adoption of a systematic program to maintain their existing infrastructure is vital to maintaining property values. Accordingly, on May 9, 2005, the City Council accepted the Pavement Management Report and Financing Report, adopted the Pavement Management Policies, and established a Street Maintenance and Reconstruction Program. The Pavement Management Plan targeted the Shenandoah Area for proposed reconstruction. The OCI ratings for these streets ranged from 23 to 44. This Project is part of the City's existing 5 -year Capitol Improvement Program. The decision - making process to authorize this Project consists of many steps including several public meetings and a referendum in accordance with the City Charter. This process and the steps are explained further within the next section of this Report. 1 13849.004 I1. PROCESS AND PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE A. Initiation of Project • Order Preparation of Shenandoah Feasibility Report May 14, 2007 B. Receive Shenandoah Feasibility Report / Call Public Hearing June 11, 2007 • Notice of hearing shall be published twice, at least one week apart, in the official newspaper of the City no Tess than two weeks prior to the date of hearing, and • A copy of the hearing, including estimated unit prices and the estimated total price, shall be mailed to each benefited property owner at least two weeks prior to the date of the hearing. C. Hold Neighborhood Meetings D. Public Hearing E. Petitioning Process June /July July 9, 2007 • Within 60 days after close of public hearing, the following petitions can be filed: (July 9, 2007 to September 6, 2007 = 60 Days) - A petition against improvement by either majority of property owners proposed to be assessed or if initiated by (1 a) at least equal to number petitioning for improvement under (1 a). Council can not make improvement at expense of benefited property owners. Council can not vote on same improvement for one year from public hearing. — If petition for improvement at least equal to (4ai), then Council can order improvement. F. Referendum Question at City Council September 10, 2007 • Must be submitted to Election Liaison by 5:00 p.m. September 11, 2007 • Must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2007, to Anoka County 2 13849.004 G. Election November 6, 2007 • Must hold an election within 120 days after close of public hearing (Note: July 9, 2007 to November 6, 2007 = 120 Days) H. Authorize Improvement Project & Preparation of Plans /Specifications December 2007 I. Hold Neighborhood Meetings Ongoing 2008 J. Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids Spring 2009 K. Accept Bids Spring 2009 L. Assessment Hearing Spring 2009 M. Start Construction Spring 2009 N. End Construction Fall 2009 III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS As established in the existing 5 -year CIP, the following streets are programmed for reconstruction in 2009: A. 2009 CONSTRUCTION 1. Shenandoah Area Rice Court Hokah Court Hokah Drive Totem Trail Arrowhead Drive Totem Trail to Cul -de -sac Hokah Drive to Cul -de -sac Totem Trail to Birch Street Arrowhead Drive to Birch Street Ware Road to 550 feet East of Totem Trail Overall, these streets are typical of many streets in the City that are over 30 years in age and are reaching the end of their design life. The overall condition assessment of the proposed improvement areas are further described in the following Section. 3 13849.004 IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY The Project area is located in the southwest portion of the City, just east of Ware Road and south of Birch Street. The properties in this area consist of single family homes located on Tots averaging roughly 1/3 acre in size. The majority of the streets were constructed in 1976 and sealcoated in 1987. On average, the streets are 32 feet in width (back of curb to back of curb), constructed with concrete surmountable curb and gutter and bituminous pavement. The streets are over 30 years old, and the pavement surface is showing signs of aging and deterioration, which includes settlement, cracking, and rutting. While some portions of the existing curb and gutter are in good condition, much of the curbing has settled and deteriorated, thus inhibiting drainage. The storm sewer and catch basins were constructed originally with the streets in 1976, and does not meet the current City standards. The flat grades and areas of settling have resulted in numerous areas of substandard drainage. Properties in the proposed Project area are currently served by sanitary sewer. City water is currently not in place, and the properties have individual wells. A. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS In accordance with the City's Pavement Management Plan and Capital Improvement Program, the following proposed street and utility improvements are recommended. Exhibits are located in the Appendix. 1. Streets Any new or reconstructed street within the City of Lino Lakes is expected to be constructed to the City's current standard for width and cross section. It is recommended that new surmountable curb and gutter be installed for the entire Project area. A 7 -ton pavement section that includes a 2 -foot subcut and placement of select granular borrow, followed by 5 inches of Class 5 aggregate base, 2 inches of bituminous base, and 1 -1/2 inches of bituminous wearing course is proposed. The standard width for a residential street per the City's standards is 32 feet (back of curb to back of curb). The street widths in the Shenandoah 4 13849.004 neighborhood are currently 32 feet. Replacement of all curb and gutter will result in a uniform grade and a longer life span for the street. No new trails or sidewalks are proposed as part of the improvements. Soil borings were taken and a soils report prepared for this Project. There were no unusual soil conditions encountered. No specific soil correction work is required on this Project. 2. Storm Sewer and Drainage The storm sewer is under - designed in some locations. For much of the Project area, runoff must travel significant distances over flat grades, and uneven curb before reaching a catch basin. This is particularly true for the longer streets such as Hokah Drive. Therefore, it is recommended that additional storm sewer and catch basin structures be installed to reach areas currently not properly served, and that the existing pipes and structures be cleaned and /or replaced as needed. Design of the storm sewer and drainage system must also meet the requirements of the City's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, and Rice Creek Watershed District requirements for stormwater treatment. Potential sites for stormwater treatment ponds include Shenandoah Park at the downstream end of existing drainage system. Other locations include the area adjacent to the existing drainage ditch at Arrowhead Drive and at the existing storm sewer outfall east of the intersection of Totem Trail and Rice Court. A Wetland Delineation Report has been completed for this Project. The only wetlands in the Project area occur along the ditch section. There should be no wetland impacts on this Project. 3. Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system in this neighborhood is in good condition. At this time, it is expected that any Project work related to the sanitary sewer would 5 13849.004 involve manhole rim adjustments, infiltration prevention sealing, and repair work on the manholes. Prior to reconstruction of the street, it is recommended that all sanitary sewer lines be televised and inspected. Any isolated areas that may pose potential problems in the future would be repaired as required. 4. Watermain City water is currently not located in the Project area; however, it is available on Ware Road and Birch Street to service this area. The properties are now served with individual wells. Reconstruction of the street provides the most opportune time to add watermain improvements to the properties in this area. It is proposed to extend 8 -inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) watermain into the Shenandoah Area. This will provide both drinking water and fire protection to the neighborhood. Connection to existing watermains located on Birch Street and Ware Road would be made. These extensions would provide service to all properties, and would loop the system to provide adequate circulation and pressure. The extent of the water system improvements are shown in the Appendix. Individual 1 -inch copper services would be extended to all properties, at locations as requested by the property owners. Individual property owners are responsible for making arrangements to install the water service from the street right -of -way into the house, and for abandoning their well. 6 13849.004 V. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Included in the Appendix of this Report are detailed estimates of the construction costs for the Project. The costs are estimated based on recent construction projects in the Lino Lakes area and assume the installation of the improvements would begin in the summer of 2009. A summary of total estimated street construction and project costs, including contingencies, easements, and indirect costs is listed as follows: Street and Drainage $ 1,478,000.00 Watermain $ 678,635.00 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 2,156,635.00 VI. EASEMENTS The majority of the street reconstruction and any utility construction activity are expected to be confined to the existing rights -of -way. Property within Shenandoah Park owned by the City would need to be dedicated as drainage and utility easements in order to provide for stormwater treatment. Some construction easements on private property (such as between 426 and 434 Arrowhead Drive where the existing storm sewer is located) may also be necessary. VII. PERMITS Permits will be required from various governmental agencies as follows: Construction and Grading Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Permit) Storrnwater Rice Creek Watershed District Street and Utility Connections Anoka County Watermain Construction Minnesota Department of Health 7 13849.004 VIII. FINANCING AND PROJECT ASSESSMENTS The streets identified for reconstruction are proposed to be funded by a combination of special assessments and general tax levies. Because a general tax levy is necessary to fund a portion of the costs associated with the improvements, the City must obtain voter approval prior to proceeding with such improvements. If authorization to proceed is granted by a referendum, it is expected that a portion of the improvement costs would be funded by the issuance of general obligation bonds with the debt service paid by a property tax levy. The remaining improvement costs would be funded by special assessments to the benefiting properties. The watermain extension costs would be assessed 100% to the benefiting properties in accordance with City policy. Assessments amounts would be consistent with the policies of the City of Lino Lakes and with the requirements of the City Charter and Minnesota State Law. However, property owners may within 60 days of the Public Hearing, petition against the Project. In accordance with the current City policy, street assessments (street and storm sewer) shall be assessed on the basis of a lot/unit assessment. For a single family area, the calculated assessment rate is the quotient of the one half of the total cost of the improvement divided by the total front footage for the improvement. This Calculated Assessment Rate (CAR) shall be compared to the Maximum Assessment Rate (MAR), and the lesser of the two shall be used. The current Maximum Assessment Rate for streets and drainage is $83.10 /Foot. This Project area is in the R -1 Zoning District, which would mean an 80 -foot wide lot size will be used to calculate the Lot/Unit Assessments. The Street/Storm Assessment Rates are calculated as shown below. Street/Storm Total Street and Drainage Cost $ 1,478,000.00 Total Front Frontage $ 7,841.00 Calculated Assesment Rate (CAR) $ 94.25 Maximum Assessment Rate (MAR) $ 83.10 Assessable Units 69 Lot/Unit Assessment Rate ($ /Lot) $ 6,648.00 Total To Be Assessed $ 465,360.00 8 13849.004 The total cost to install new utilities is assessed 100% to the benefiting properties as defined in Section XVII, which is titled Municipal Utilities in the Pavement Management Policies. The Watermain Assessment Rates are calculated as shown below. Watermain Construction Cost $ 443,000.00 Unit Cost $ 235,635.00 Trunk Credit $ (53,000.00) Assessable Units 69 Lot/Unit Assessment Rate ($✓Lot) $ 9,067.17 Total To Be Assessed $ 625,635.00 Unit Cost is the City Water Trunk Utility Unit Charge of $3,415.00. The funding for this Project is calculated as shown below. Project Funding Assessments $ 1,012,419.15 Assessments on Public Property $ 78,575.85 (Supported by Tax Levy) Trunk Water Area & Unit $ 53,000.00 General Tax Levy $ 1, 012, 640.00 Total Project Cost $ 2,156,635.00 IX. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS As provided in this Report, the Shenandoah Area has been identified as a candidate for reconstruction in 2009 in accordance with the City's Pavement Management. This Report covered proposed improvements, costs, and financing of the Project. We recommend that the City proceed with this Project as it is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. The City should proceed with the improvement process and schedule as described in this Report. 9 13849.004 This report represents an estimated statement of project costs based on a preliminary design using City standard specifications for public improvements. The purpose of the report is to provide the council and the general public with the probable costs of construction and a proposed assessment amount in accordance with City Charter and Minnesota Statutes. In the event that the project funding is allowed under City Charter provisions including approval in the general election a detailed final design process would be initiated. The final design process will include additional neighborhood input, design alternatives, and redefined cost estimates based on final design as directed by City Council. 10 13849.004 APPENDIX PROJECT LOCATION MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED STREET RECONSTRUCTION & STORM SEWER PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL APPENDIX PROJECT LOCATION MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED STREET RECONSTRUCTION & STORM SEWER PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 1. PRAIRIE FLOWER RD 2. IRONWOOD CIR. 3. HICIODRY PL BIRCH • Amml 1,4 IUiFIijI!fflH11Iiu' _- ■ ■Z11". ��� /111����111� rim mods a rain Atm iv, maignom ve. I'IWIL PROJECT LOCATIO\ III 400 800 SCALE IN FEET TKDA ENGINEERS •ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS PROJ. NO. 13371 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 3, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY SHENANDOAH AREA PROJECT LOCATION MAP 1.6 rn 0 • • 6413 0 TOTEM ®TRAIL® D412 C--s= \`4 6414 - O Q i o ® �(I --i I h Bra ® 7/ L//!' rT F-' 11 2 ( I' f 11 i fl W.' 1 I : 11 I � W. I I I d 11. 'sal I , II Ij. c I, I 'I` fTl `0'' r I` I • I 0 l e l 3 6421 " 6401 II Im I t m llm (G IIti �y 1) § 14, �J -- D — — — D 2— 1– 12' TRUSS ; II -I-, — — —D — 4 12 TRUSS p � - - — BI ;URCE D —D D _�i D . r e - - - x _._ ii a + — • IF s 440 6489 0 647 3 6422 6430 6438 6446 6454 4� '-v--• 1......._2- TFtUSS i0 � �� r T �c� ` \ \\', A -9; _ ,vo- 1 6496 ,` \ \ \ \ 0 SEE BELOW 0 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET 401 407 rr ml� u 1 II;I ARRO HEAD DRIVE P 0 v m = " -"I , , 1 • 1.14.1 -895 8412 CkG I ^1 �7RUS5 8muss 8412 a1 rI 402 408 413 414 SEE ABOVE 1 p_:,,11, ; ® N � / / i o / )'�// / 111 -- t i1 J) ;/ / H / / / 425 0 to "/ / /,e; T 1 433 n (c/ lio l t --T7;i7-7--8-1: L -1'-t--_ Dom_ -0_( =� F / / l' D m FACED .,,i_.....;;.:1„._ 3-12" �! 43 O .a. s: aPi�@;� �G-e _ 1=` DN RBBIB C 1 /Ia r 5' = 11'P / r 1 T — — 5_ _ _ = Lc 1 D 434▪ l' r j _ f 420 442 450 0 466 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET CO WETLAND e CITY PARK 501 4-0— — 4 & ^-- —a 9 - - -4_— 474 CITY K 480 486 PROJECT LIMITS 507 ARROWHEAD DRIVE I o ..I -.F .i.... TV - -- '1- 1 -1 0" BIT. —c- 51 0 502 m-- 51 EXHIBIT A_ TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS COMM. NO. 13371.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 3, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY SHENANDOAH AREA EXISTING CONDITIONS lb I4KNA 0 0 BIT. SURFACE 1' BIT. WALK I J EIT BIT, - WALK II Ir 11 Si OKAH DRIVE 0 C▪ O 0 0 BIT 4 T 'I C NC I , 11 I II BIT I V 0, ' Ca .I I 1 11 \F'_ 11,1 Ih? i \t a`.._ . �.:. ' \\ \\ \ \b, 5- 16' DIP WA TERM AIN W 16 DIP WATER W 10 CO 4- 6- v 0) O BIRCH STREET 0 BIT. SURFACE MIY WA ItKMAIN W W CMP. —p — _ M. le T TrpD 11-- NItlM 118 I` 1 I s I o41 o I o I — J 5•IY m LO 0 0 0 w w 1 10 10 el 0 O �s e \\ \\ \° \\ , \ \\ I 0 o g. TE TEL 6- 0 0 LCD LO — TR \0 •F� , /"off // 8" .. 7 / 40 A \d'6 0 IT ) \\ ., � �, oil /' '. .. � 6402 1/1 / 1� \\rte `��� .- ''! / /� /. ■■ D - fX Bg�l l,. C� /1/ / 1/ . 0 n�B. - "-4&.` 1 / 1/ kus / / //: •k 71 J�rlr TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS 1 10 0 B' O12' CITY PARK J2 -1Q' COMM. NO. 13371.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 3, 2005 0 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT B FEASIBILITY STUDY SHENANDOAH AREA EXISTING CONDITIONS 0 0 0 0 II II 6 11 . II 6413 421 11 44, I 1 III fr.:, : I • ; v.„ .t.---■—.----,, ,.I. -=. ---'-- 1 _ I l'-- ,:.._, .._ . _.__, _ ......., ..!.2_. ''-±"..' ._, ._. TOTEM @TRAIL. • • • • • 0 co 0 . ..., ...„. 1 i a ..__ .--,,- =.-.._, ._-.... '... T— - -- • .,--- * "ii-''11 - • sa ' .. • ; im Y) ti, - • ; ,...,, 50.-. . li ''• 11 6414 I i 4.. Ln 11 6422 11 — 6430 73. \;17',>•-•, Ill 1, III ri 0 Iril-3 ‘11: III .1., 0 0 (1) SEE BELOW 0 0 0 4, 0 0 0 11 l':11 6401 "•"- • I • 0 6459 0 6473 6481 0 440 e...-•;„ • 0 6438 0 6446 - 6454 6466 0 0 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET < 0 Li I 401 407 1 I ARRO HEAD DRIVE k‘. 413 n / , • -• '' e 'IRUS-I• 5" TRUSS — 1 4.. ,...,...1. • y••1•1,_ .. 01 - 1 ',: : , 0-- ----r---== ••••'" ---- -- 8" > V1 ''. ..- C\ r:\ i•,;.___.,,-,_ • -7-,.-."--:,,,,- --. --.P...i.c.,,, U. 0 J. 1 402 408 414 0 420 426 0 434 0 SEE ABOVE CO ----7----_. _ _ _, _----,----,--,, , 1 n , . ..,_. _-:-_,,,,, _ '- - 1 .=-4..&=,-.3B4.4 --------"--J. -v1---'--'''T- .., I r' '-'-'• _ 'i ----i'-,--,-„., 442 ---4-....44::.,., ‘7,-;,-;.,-_ 4so 455 0 466 0 474 CITY PARK 0 CITY F K 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET WETLAND 480 WETLAND 501 507 pi\ 1 ARROWHEAD DRIVE 5. 1 l• 486 0 502 51 -- EXHIBIT C TKDA ENGINEERS •ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS COMM. NO. 13371.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 3, 2005 FEASIBILITY STUDY SHENANDOAH AREA PROPOSED WATERMAIN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 g E ! 0 0 0) 0) 24" CASING 0) HOKAH DRIVE ,A4 cr, 0 BIRCH STREET 0 0) CO V . 1.:,,,--•._ 0) Ckfi, 11 I • h.' •-- ih ' O 4> --I C4 I' 1 h 1 ; v. 0 0 0 0 6' 0 6' 0 0 0 0 10 24' CASING 711 LU 0 I r{V.- 0I 0 00 01 tD 11 0 n 0 CITY PARK 0 (0 0' 0 ' 6'sr 6402 6435 0 • • , HpicAti 012/1T 6/09 -• 0 0 (0 0 TKDA ENGINEERS- ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET COMM. NO. 13371.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 3, 2005 150 EXHIBIT D FEASIBILITY STUDY SHENANDOAH AREA PROPOSED WATERMAIN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ifl SEE BELOW 0 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET 0 O cc w II III II 14, 1 401 407 ARRO HEAD DRIVE I 1 1 I 413 SEE ABOVE 0 419 425 0 0 433 O 402 1 °Tr, 408 CITY PARK 0 414 420 426 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET WETLAND 1 _t. ,i WETLAND 434 1 442 Ilk TEL 450 0 TV 1 0 458 0 -1I CITY TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS COMM. NO. 13371.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 3, 2005 501 507 ARROWHEAD DRIVE 1 1 0 1 1 L J J 5 TV ®EL 0 TTEL II V 1I 1T 502 51 EXHIBIT E FEASIBILITY STUDY SHENANDOAH AREA PROPOSED STREET RECONSTRUCTION lb UIY WATER1UA1 0 01 LID W Lij 0 O 2 ; 16 DIP WATERUAIN W W t0 CO 0) 0 Cn 03 Al 16 DIP - - BIRCH STREET s s 6' a W '/7 . co 01 W W m co a tO 0 TEL 6 c 6R 6433 0 6' 6109 Okay OR7VE TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS C? CITY PARK 2 E3 COMM. NO. 13371.000 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA JUNE 3, 2005 • 0 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT F FEASIBILITY STUDY SHENANDOAH AREA PROPOSED STREET RECONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 June 11, 2007 SHENANDOAH AREA (TOTEM TRAIL, HOKAH DRIVE, RICE COURT, HOKAH COURT, ARROWHEAD DRIVE) PROBABLE STREET RECONSTRUCTION & STORM SEWER COSTS Length: 4,050 Feet, Width: 32 Feet (Existing and Proposed) ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT ENGINEERS ESTIMATE ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION NERAL 1 MOBILIZATION LS 0.8 $40,000.00 $32,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 CLEAR TREES EA 15 $250.00 $3,750.00 4 GRUB TREES EA 15 $250.00 $3,750.00 5 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 11,000 $10.00 $110,000.00 6 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 1000 $10.00 $10,000.00 7 SELECT GRANULAR BARROW C.V. CY 12,000 $15.00 $180,000.00 8 REMOVE AND REINSTALL MAILBOXES /SIGNS LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 9 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY (ALL THICKNESSES) SY 2000 $3.50 $7,000.00 10 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY (ALL THICKNESSES) SY 130 $6.00 $780.00 11 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (ALL DESIGNS) LF 8400 $4.00 $33,600.00 12 REMOVE BIT. PAVEMENT (ALL THICKNESSES) SY 14,000 $2.50 $35,000.00 13 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS LF 175 $4.00 $700.00 14 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL PER M 49 $20.00 $980.00 15 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RS 41 $280.00 $11,480.00 16 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 4,800 $15.00 $72,000.00 17 WEAR COURSE MIX (1 - 1/2 ") TON 1,300 $55.00 $71,500.00 18 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK GAL 720 $2.50 $1,800.00 19 BASE COURSE MIX (2 ") TON 1,600 $52.00 $83,200.00 20 B -618 CURB AND GUTTER LF 100 $12.00 $1,200.00 21 D -412 CURB AND GUTTER LF 8,300 $10.00 $83,000.00 22 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 130 $42.00 $5,460.00 23 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PATCH SY 2000 $18.00 $36,000.00 24 SOD WITH 4" TOP SOIL SY 6,000 $5.00 $30,000.00 25 SALVAGE OF SIGNS LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 26 ADJUST MANHOLE COVER/CASTING EA 17 $450.00 $7,650.00 27 PERFORATED DRAIN TILE LS 500 $10.00 $5,000.00 28 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 SUBTOTAL STREET CONSTRUCTION $840,850.00 GE COIjtS RUC11ON 1 MOBILIZATION LS 0.1 $40,000.00 $4,000.00 2 DEWATERING FOR STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 3 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 4 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE BEDDING TON 100 $8.00 $800.00 5 REMOVE EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE LF 830 $12.00 $9,960.00 6 POND EXCAVATION CY 1500 $10.00 $15,000.00 7 24" RCP CLASS V STORM SEWER LF 1510 $38.00 $57,380.00 8 24" FES EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 9 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE EA 16 $2,000.00 $32,000.00 10 EASEMENTS LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 11 PERMITS LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 SUBTOTAL DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION $154,140.00 TOTAL CONTINGENCIES (10 %) SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMINISTRATION (35 %) $994,990.00 $99,499.00 $1,094,489.00 $383,511.00 TOTAL: STREET AND DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION 1,478,000.001 1 June 11, 2007 SHENANDOAH AREA (TOTEM TRAIL, HOKAH DRIVE, RICE COURT, HOKAH COURT, ARROWHEAD DRIVE) PROBABLE WATERMAIN COSTS Length: 4,400 Feet ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE EXTENSION WATERMAIN 1 MOBILIZATION LS 0.1 $40,000.00 $4,000.00 2 DEWATERING FOR WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 4 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 5 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE BEDDING TON 100 $8.00 $800.00 6 CONNECT TO EXISITING WATERMAIN EA 3 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 7 6" DIP WATERMAIN LF 160 $28.00 $4,480.00 8 8" DIP WATERMAIN PIPE LF 4400 $32.00 $140,800.00 9 24" STEEL CASING PIPE LF 160 $200.00 $32,000.00 10 8" GATE VALVE EA 8 $1,400.00 $11,200.00 11 HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE EA 9 $2,500.00 $22,500.00 12 1" CORPORATION STOP EA 66 $150.00 $9,900.00 13 1" CURB STOP EA 66 $150.00 $9,900.00 14 1" TYPE K COPPER SERVICE LF 1980 $14.00 $27,720.00 15 BITUMINOUS RESTORATION SY 100 $19.00 $1,900.00 TOTAL $298,200.00 1 1 CONTINGENCIES (1O %) SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMINISTRATION (35 %) $29,820.00 $328,020.00 $114,980.00 ,014STRUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL EASIBILITY REPORT HENANDOAH AREA STREET, STORM SEWER, AND WATERMAIN IflY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA KDA PROJECT NO. 13849.004 June 11, 2007 STREET & WATERMAIN FRONT STORM WATERMAIN UNIT TOTAL IN OWNER ADDRESS STREET UNIT WATER UNIT FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT CHARGE ASSESSMENT 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 5,652.17 $ 15,715.17 6498 Totem Trail 1 1 6,648.00 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0003 Schmidt, eVivian Bruce 1 100.00 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 9- 31 -22 -33 -0004 Baker, Vivian D. 6490 Totem Trail 1 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 6482 Totem Trail 1 1 90.00 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 9-31-22-33-0005 Schmidt, Lawrence & Catherine 1 1 90.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 9- 31 -22 -33 -0006 Morisette, Jeffrey & Wendy L. 6474 Totem Trail 92.74 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 29-31-22-33-0007 Irwin, Alan J. & Sharon L. 6466 Totem Trail 1 1 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 6454 Totem Trail 1 1 85.00 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 29 31 -22 -33 -0008 Rost, James H. & Susan M. 1 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ I9-31-22-33-0009 Hartung, T. A & Gustafson, L. J. 6446 Totem Trail 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 9-31-22-33-0010 Hartung, George b. 6438 Totem Trail 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 95.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 9- 31 -22 -33 0011 Koolmo, Kavin M. 6430 Totem Trail 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0012 Gross, Raymond T. Jr. & L. L. 6422 Totem Trail 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 251.74 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 19-31-22-33-0013 Norton, Christine A. 6414 Totem Trail 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 9-31-22-33-0019 Oberg, Derek 6498 Hokah Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 9- 31 -22 -33 -0020 Bayer, Robert P. & Mary E. 6490 Hokah Drive 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0021 Thompson, Sharon D. & James R. 6482 Hokah Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 130.01 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 19-31-22-33-0022 Keim, Dennis A. & Leanne L. 6474 Hokah Drive 130.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 9- 31 -22 -33 0023 Blomberg, David &Carol M. 6458 Hokah Drive 1 1 110.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 9-31-22-33-0024 Ahlers, Warren G. &Judith M. 6426 Hokah Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 117.17 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29- 31 -22 -33 -0025 Espersen, Mark & Jodene 6418 Hokah Drive 120.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0026 Burmeister, Richard O. & Melissa 6408 Hokah Drive 1 1 I 29-3122-33-0027 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 248.20 $ 6,648.00 $ 9,067.17 Farrell, Clare M. 6402 Hokah Drive 100.00 $ $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 0014 Proffitt, Paul E. 440 Birch Street 0 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 248.20 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29- 31 -22 -33 -0028 Singerhouse, Richard L. & R. M. 6401 Rice Court 85.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0029 Christensen, Richard S. 8 A. L. 6409 Rice Court 1 1 I 341500 $ 15,715.17 1 1 86.76 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 15,715.17 29-31-22-33-0030 Arko, Robert W. & Nancy J. 6417 Rice Court 108 34 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29 31 -22 -33 0031 Lange, Greg &Amy 6425 Rice Court 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 47.81 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29- 31 -22 -33 -0032 Bolin, no, Michael M. & Mary J. 6433 Rice Court 50.17 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0033 Bolin, Ronald W. & Denise L 6441 Rice Court 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 46.14 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 129-31-22-33-0034 Mench, Michael J. & Carol J. 6449 Rice Court 67.35 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0035 Krieger, Mathew f. &Teri M. 6457 Rice Court 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 189.69 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29 31 -22- 33-0036 Paul, Debra 6465 Rice Court 256.27 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0037 St. Michelle, Samantha 6473 Totem Trail 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 I 1 1 110.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29-31-22-33-0038 Burger, Brian 6481 Totem Trail 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29 31 -22- 33-0039 Berg, Gerald R. & Diane M. 6489 Totem Trail 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 230.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29- 31 -22 -33 0040 Johnson, David C. &Anne L. 6421 Totem Trial 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0041 Koenig, Paul R. & Karen M. 6409 Hokah Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 80.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29 31 -22 -33 -0042 Kulaszewicz Richard J. & D. J. 6417 Hokah Drive 207.06 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0043 Ellingson, Mark K. & Kay L. 6425 Hokah Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 65.92 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 I 29- 31 -22 -33 0044 Menne, Richard J. & Nancy M. 6433 Hokah Drive 49.45 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0045 Glad, Gary A. & Patricia L. 6441 Hokah Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 I 1 1 51.71 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29-31-22-33-0046 Tietje, Diane 6449 Hokah Drive 200.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0047 Damewood, Joanne 6457 Hokah Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 85.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29-31-22-33-0048 Olson, Glen A &Anna L. 6465 Hokah Drive 91 10 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0049 Olson, Glenn B. & Novak, Lynn M. 6473 Hokah Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29- 31 -22 -33 -0050 Thein, Michael D. 6481 Hokah Drive 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0051 Armstrong, Patrick D. & Marcia A. 6489 Hokah Drive 1 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 6497 Hokah Drive 1 1 11178 $ $ $ 6,648.00 29-31-22-33-0052 Coker, Rebecca John S. 1 0 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0061 Michaelson, John & Millicent 401 Arrowhead Drive 29- 31 -22 -33 -0062 Carlson, Jeffry J. & Cheryl J. 407 Arrowhead Drive 1 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29-31-22-33-0063 Newell, Nancy A. &Todd L. 413 Arrowhead Drive 95.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0064 Kamrath, K. E. & Biermeier, J. L. 419 Arrowhead Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 105.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 I 29 31 -22- 33-0065 Piette, Craig S. & Rodmyre, Beth 425 Arrowhead Drive 105.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0066 Copeland, Ann 433 Arrowhead Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 230.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29-31-22-33-0067 Wasilk, Joseph & Joanne 6413 Totem Trail 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0068 Simons, Michael K 474 Arrowhead Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 I 29-31-22-33-0069 Bennett, Dale A. & Burring, D. F. A. 466 Arrowhead Drive 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0070 Harley, Matt V. 458 Arrowhead Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29 31 -22 -33 -0071 Stewart, Patricia A. 450 Arrowhead Drive 90.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29-31-22-33-0072 Lunak, Frances M 442 Arrowhead Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 90.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29-31-22-33-0073 Baker, Archibald Jr. & Robin 434 Arrowhead Drive gp pp $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0074 Chambers, Michael B. & Mary E. 426 Arrowhead Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 1 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 15,715.17 29- 31 -22 -33 -0075 Kissack, Maureen J. 420 Arrowhead Drive 93.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 29- 31 -22 -33 -0076 Skarda, William E. & Susan M. 414 Arrowhead Drive 1 1 5,652.17 $ 3,415.00 $ 15,715.17 I 29- 31 -22 -33 -0077 Underdahl, Lucas 408 Arrowhead Drive 1 1 90.00 $ 6,648.00 $ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ILEASIBILITY REPORT HENANDOAH AREA STREET, STORM SEWER, AND WATERMAIN CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 1111-KDA PROJECT NO. 13849.004 It9- 31 -22 -33 -0078 29- 31 -22 -33 -0082 119- 31 -22 -33 -0085 9- 31 -22 -33 -0080 9- 31 -22 -33 -0084 IN OWNER ADDRESS STREET UNIT WATER UNIT STREET & FRONT STORM FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT WATERMAIN ASSESSMENT WATERMAIN UNIT CHARGE June 11, 2007 TOTAL ASSESSMENT Havran, David E. Schendel, Jeffrey R. & Susan Lund, John A. & Joyce a. City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes 402 Arrowhead Drive 486 Arrowhead Drive 480 Arrowhead Drive Park North of Arrowhead Drive Park South of Arrowhead Drive 1 1 1 4 1 0 1 1 4 1 100.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 95.00 $ 6,648.00 $ 93.31 $ 6,648.00 $ 384.46 $ 26,592.00 $ 53.00 $ 6,648.00 $ - $ 5,652.17 $ 5,652.17 $ 22,608.68 $ 5,652.17 $ - $ 3,415.00 $ 3,415.00 $ 13,660.00 $ 3,415.00 $ 6,648.00 15,715.17 15,715.17 62,860.68 15,715.17 'TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 70 69 7841.38 $ 465,360.00 $ 390,000.00 $ 235,635.00 $ 1,090,995.00 • • AGENDA ITEM 6E STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 TOPIC: Resolution No. 07 - 86, Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids, Lino Park Grading and Trail Improvements Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: This project is part of the 2007 Park Board Goals that were approved at the January 8, 2007 council meeting. These improvements will serve as the neighborhood park for the new residents. The park funds from the Pine Glen development will fund these improvements. City staff has prepared the plans and specifications for this work and is requesting Council approval to accept the plans and specifications and advertise for bids. The schedule for this project is as follows: Open Bids City Council Awards Contract Construction Begins July 12, 2007 July 23, 2007 August, 2007 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of Resolution No. 07 - 86, Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement for Bids, Lino Park Grading and Trail Improvements. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 07 -86 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS — LINO PARK GRADING AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the Lino Park Grading and Trail Improvements and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; WHERAS, the Lino Park Grading and Trail Improvement project is part of the 2007 Park Board Goals approved by the Council January 8, 2007 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at City Hall, are hereby approved. 2. The City clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on July 23, 2007, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. John Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 11th day of June, 2007. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • 1/ r r� fr 1 4, / (�4 o / `- SAN. - r,,.c — / ` c5 C r 4:\ ROM COW w LAE Q— — d./ `a b 0 k a / -55- / 1 i �•� i i c•o r / // / j 4/ / ) au LNt \ f/ • • • COUNCIL MINUTES May 29, 2007 DRAFT 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 2 MINUTES 3 4 5 DATE : May 29, 2007 6 TIME STARTED : 6:35 p.m. 7 TIME ENDED : 7:55 p.m. 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Carlson, O'Donnell, 9 Stoltz and Mayor Bergeson 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member Reinert 11 12 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; City Attorney, William Hawkins; 13 Community Development Director, Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; City Planner, 14 Jeff Smyser, Finance Director, Al Rolek; Fire Chief, Milo Bennet (part); and City Clerk, Julie Bartell 15 16 PUBLIC COMMENT 17 18 No one was present to address the council regarding a matter not on the agenda. 19 20 SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT 21 22 Mayor Bergeson announced that Lino Lakes received the 2007 Environmental Initiative Award for 23 Green Building and Development associated with the I -35E Corridor AUAR Study. This was a 24 collaborative, interagency project and the Mayor offered thanks to advisory board members, 25 consultants and city staff, especially Community Development Director Grochala and City Planner 26 Smyser. 27 28 SETTING THE AGENDA 29 30 The agenda was amended to move Consent Item 1B, the minutes of the council work session of May 31 29, 2007, to Unfinished Business as Council Member Carlson was absent from the meeting. 32 33 CONSENT AGENDA 34 35 Council Member Carlson moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items lA through 1F except Item 36 1B. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried; Council Member Reinert 37 absent. 38 39 ITEM ACTION 40 41 Consideration of Expenditures: 42 43 May 29, 2007 (Check No. 80091 through Approved 44 80227) in the amount of $411,766.75; 45 1 COUNCIL MINUTES May 29, 2007 DRAFT 46 Centennial Fire District (Check No. 2662 through Approved 47 2685) in the amount of $34,822.07 48 49 Consider approval of May 14, 2007 City Council Meeting 50 Minutes Approved 51 52 Consider approval of May 14, 2007 Liquor Compliance 53 Hearing Minutes Approved 54 55 Consider Resolution No. 07 -76 approving application for Approved 56 temporary 3.2 beer license, cabaret license and exemption 57 for gambling permit for the annual St. Joseph's Catholic 58 Church Festival, August 11 & 12 59 60 Consider Resolution No. 07 -77 approving an annual Approved 61 permit for the sale of consumer fireworks for Super Target 62 at 749 Apollo Drive 63 64 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK 65 66 Resolution No. 07 -80 providing for issuance and sale of $4,215,000 General Obligation Tax 67 Increment Bonds — Finance Director Rolek reviewed the proposed issuance noting that this bonding 68 portion of the financing plan for the 1 -35W Lake Drive Interchange Project will be primarily funded 69 using tax increment, with MSA (Municipal State Aid) as a back up. Although the bonds carry a 70 general obligation, with all costs being MSA eligible a tax levy is considered just a safety net that is 71 never expected to be utilized. 72 73 Springsted Bond Counsel Terri Heaton noted that the rating from Moody's is pending, however, with 74 the city's good overall bond rating and a general obligation backing, these bonds should be very 75 marketable and she estimates they will come in with about a 4.1 percent interest rate. 76 77 Council Member Stoltz moved to approve Resolution No. 07 -80 as presented. Council Member 78 O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carved; Council Member Reinert absent. 79 80 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH 81 82 Miller's on Main Special Event, Request for variance from state fire code - Administrator Heitke 83 explained that the owner of Miller's on Main, Chad Wagner, has applied for a special event permit to 84 conduct his annual music and dance event in a tent adjacent to his property. During review of the permit 85 application, it was determined that the proposed tent setback would not meet state fire code requirements. 86 There is a process that allows for request of a variance at the state level but local authorities are requested 87 to consider the matter first. The state established criteria for considering a variance was reviewed as well 88 as the advisory that granting a variance in good faith leaves the city with no liability in the matter. The 89 council viewed the site plan for the event with staff pointing out the area being considered for a variance. 2 -57- • • COUNCIL MINUTES May 29, 2007 DRAFT S90 91 Chad Wagner, owner of Miller's on Main, noted that the event site would be basically the same as 92 past years as indicated on the site plan provided with his application. Weather is a big consideration 93 for staging this event and a tent is vital. A smaller tent that would meet set back requirements 94 wouldn't be sufficient for the number of participants. 95 Fire Chief Bennet reported that he doesn't object to Mr. Wagner's variance request. 96 Council Member Stoltz moved to endorse the state fire code variance request acting in good faith and 97 based on the following criteria: 98 - there is substantial compliance with the provisions of the code; 99 - the safety of the public and occupants of such building will not 100 be jeopardized; 101 - undue hardship will result to the applicant unless such variance is granted; 102 Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carried; Council Member Reinert absent. 103 104 Miller's on Main Special Event, Consider Resolution No. 07 -81 approving Special Event Permit 105 & Cabaret License - City Clerk Bartell reported that as previously discussed, Chad Wagner, owner 106 of Miller's on Main at 8001 Lake Drive, has applied to the City for permission to conduct his annual 107 music tent event on August 17 and 18, 2007. Mr. Wagner is requesting approval of a cabaret license 108 and special event permit and staff has been working with him to ensure that the event is planned to 109 comply with appropriate regulations, including public safety requirements. A Iist of conditions has 110 been developed that includes the council's direction that the Police Department monitor sound levels 111 throughout the event. Also a condition is included that requires Mr. Miller to obtain a variance to the 112 state fire code relative to his tent setback. All conditions are set forth as Attachment A to Res] No. 113 07 -81; 114 115 Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 07 -81, as presented. Council Member 411 116 Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried; Council Member Reinert absent '17 .18 Resolution 07 -78 approving renewal of liquor, wine, beer and dance licenses for the 119 2007/2008 license period — City Clerk Bartell explained that all liquor, wine, beer and dance licenses 120 in the City of Lino Lakes are issued annually and will expire an June 30, 2007. A list of the 121 establishments that have submitted renewal applications was included in the information received by 122 the council and staff has been working with the applicants to put in place all necessary information 123 and documentation to meet state and local requirements for the license they request. 124 125 City Clerk Bartell reported that the Police Department has completed background investigations for 126 the applicants and has indicated no new information that would lead to a recommendation of denial of 127 any of the licenses. The Police Department has also done compliance checks on the establishments 128 and the City Council addressed issues relating to compliance at an earlier hearing. 129 130 Council Member Carlson moved to approve Resolution No. 07 -78, as presented. Council Member 131 O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carved; Council Member Reinert absent. 132 3 • 133 134 135 36 137 138 139 140 141 142 COUNCIL MINUTES May 29, 2007 D RAFT PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA There was no report from the Public Safety Depai nent. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT. RICK DEGARDNER There was no report from the Public Services Department. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA 143 Resolution No. 07 -74 approving a Variance to the local street setback for a porch addition at 144 8020 Danube Street — City Planner Smyser explained the variance request, noting that the proposed 145 porch addition would be part of larger remodeling project at the property that has already received 146 approval of the Building Department. Staff has prepared appropriate findings in support of the 147 granting the variance and is recommending that it be approved. 148 149 The Council noted that the same criteria that establish this as an open canopy should be applied to 150 other projects. 151 152 Council Member Carlson moved to approve Resolution No. 07 -74 as presented. Council Member 153 Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried; Council Member Reinert absent. 154 155 Resolution No. 07 -75 approving an Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit to allow the 156 construction of an office building at 415 Lilac Street (Molin Concrete) — City Planner Smyser 157 reported that Molin Concrete is requesting an amendment to the conditional use permit that covers the 158 whole of their site to allow for construction of a new office building. Area homeowners were invited 159 to comment and a public hearing was held by the Planning and Zoning Board. The building that is 160 proposed meets city requirements and has been reviewed for landscaping. Staff is recommending 161 approval of the amendment. 162 53 Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 07 -75 as presented. Council Member 164 Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried; Council Member Reinert absent. 165 166 Resolution No. 07 -79, Approving Conditional Use Permit to allow earth material storage at 167 6644 20th Avenue, Royal Oaks Realty — City Engineer Studenski explained that the master before 168 the Council is an after the fact conditional use permit request to allow for a stockpile of topsoil at 169 6644 206 Av. Last year the homeowner was cited for having more than 5,000 cubic yards of earth 170 material on the site as that is not allowed in the existing code. A site map was reviewed with the 171 Council and recent installation of fencing pointed out. Engineer Studenski reviewed the site plan for 172 buildings (the home on the site has been removed), traffic (Anoka County has provided 173 correspondence establishing some requirements to meet safety issues), grading and drainage (silt 174 fence is installed and NPDES inspection would continue; watershed district permission is not 175 required however erosion and sediment control will be monitored) and tree preservation (not 176 required). 177 4 • • COUNCIL MINUTES May 29, 2007 DRAFT 178 Engineer Studenski reported that the Planning and Zoning Board voted to deny the conditional use 79 permit and the rationale is provided in the staff report. City staff is recommending approval of the .80 permit with the conditions listed in the staff report. 81 182 Marcel Eibensteiner, owner of property, addressed the Council. He is a law abiding citizen and didn't 183 realize the top soil was any kind of a violation. The site has already been improved substantially and 184 the amount of soil reduced with the filling in of the property where the house was removed. All 185 conditions requested by staff are acceptable to him except the County's turn lane requirements as they 186 are cost prohibitive. Although the conditions would place a maximum on trips to and from the 187 property, the number of trips reasonably anticipated were reported to be approximately 50 per month. 188 189 Engineer Studenski explained that if the permit were not approved, the dirt would have to be removed 190 or leveled on site. 191 192 Patrice Carpenter, 6748 201 Av, stated that the property owner has worked to meet some of the 193 conditions and it has been an improvement, however, she still believes that the situation is not in the 194 spirit of the ordinance. The code allows for storage of earth that is to be used for grading on site and 195 that is not the case. The situation is a disturbance to area residents. 196 197 Council Member Carlson moved to deny approval of the conditional use permit based on the 198 following findings: 199 200 - zoning ordinance: city is not obligated under language for conditional use permit issuance 201 since it says the city "may" grant permits; 202 - comprehensive plan: use is not consistent with nor the use intended for a rural area doesn't 203 meet agricultural objectives; seen as a "heavy" use in an area planned for future residential 204 development; 205 - traffic /safety — Anoka County has identified safety issues but is committed to requiring they 206 be addressed "to the fullest extent possible" 207 - six reasons given by Planning & Zoning Bd for denying permit. 38 209 Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried; Council Member Reinert absent. 210 211 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 212 213 May 7, 2007 Council Work Session Minutes 214 215 Council Member Stoltz moved to approve the minutes. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the 216 motion. Motion carried; Council Member Carlson abstained; Council Member Reinert absent. 217 218 NEW BUSINESS 219 220 There was no New Business. 221 222 223 ?24 25 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 ADJOURN 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 COUNCIL MINUTES DRAFT May 29, 2007 COMMUNITY CALENDAR NOVEMBER 28 THROUGH DECEMBER 8, 2006: Wednesday, May 30 4 Monday, June 4 4 Monday, June 4 4 Thursday, June 7 4 Monday, June I] Community Calendar— A Look Ahead May 29 — June 11, 2007 6:00 -7:00 p.m., Community Rm 5:30 p.m., Community Room 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers 7:00 a.m., Community Room 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Lake Dr/I -35W Info Mtg Council Work Session Park Board EDAC Council Meeting There being no further business, Council Member O'Donnell moved to adjourn at 7:55 p.m. Council Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carried; Council Member Reinert absent. These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, June 11, 2007. 243 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk 244 6 John Bergeson, Mayor • • • ts-4-1.t 1u , . e / 2 _ 0 6 Dear Council Members: I want to thank you for looking into the parking matters at Spirit Hills Mall. However, I want you to understand the magnitude of the impact these issues are having on our businesses. Since talking to you last, we are in agreement that there are parking issues within our mall. The landlord met with myself and my attorney last week. He has made it very clear that the impact I have felt on my business is not from a lack of parking, but from the "scene I have caused" by going to the city for resolution. He told me that all his friends at the city are people he grew up with and that he hears all the time how we bad mouth him. I was asked for a formal apology to him and the city council and to recant any previous claim to parking issues within the mall. He made it very clear that he intends to lease every single space in the mall. He clearly has no regard for the businesses in our mall, and stated that "unless we make this go away" he will not work with us in any way. To make any example of us, and his commitment to fight the tenants and the city, we were served an eviction notice on the 25th of May with only May's rent owing. Again, at our meeting, we were told he would not work with us Unless "you make this go away ". We will attend an eviction hearing on Tuesday, June 12th, 2007. I ask that you truly take an in depth look at the businesses in the mall, on a case by case basis. The current number of parking spaces is too few already, without any room for further growth of our businesses. This landlord has sent a message to the tenants in this mall to shut up and go away. Please do not allow that to happen. We need the city's cooperation in this matter. Thank you. Jim Szyplinski - Mansetti's Pizza & Pasta, Lino Lakes TO: Lino Lakes City Council FROM: Spirit Hills Retail Center Tenants DATE: June 10, 2007 RE: Response to Work Session Memorandum /11 )27 JUN 1 1 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES In response to your Work Session Memorandum dated May 7, 2007, we find there are several issues pertaining to your determinations and would appreciate the City Council's response. They are as follows: 1) With regards to your response to question 1 where you state "the other assumption being that after a review of the parking requirements for a Martial Arts Studios from 7 other sources, it was determined that the appropriate parking requirement be 1 space for every 200 square feet of gross floor area" we believe this to be your assumption. The actuality of this particular Karate Studio is if you conduct a review of their client list, the number of visits to the mall for classes, the number of employees, together with the experience of the mall, you will find that the number of cars per evening far exceeds 8 (4 parking spaces to employees alone). It would be more in line with at least 20- 30 per evening. Also, since the Karate Studio has only been in operation for 6 months, it would only make sense that the parking needs will become even greater in the future. 2) Also, in response to question 1, the square footage of Allure Salon/Spa is inaccurate. The square footage is actually 2,540. Allure Salon/Spa also currently has 15 employees. Since you allotted only 10 parking spaces, this would not even cover the number of employees, let alone any clients. Keeping in mind that this is a Spa and offers numerous services other than hair, it is practical that up to 12 to 15 clients are generally in the Salon/Spa at any given time. Continuing research with other cities is ongoing. As with the Karate Studio, the Salon/Spa is continuing to grow. How will the current parking accommodate for growth ?? 3) Regarding "The Other Considerations" on page 4, the parking behind the liquor store /gas station should not be considered "temporary" as the merchants /employees of Spirit Hills Retail Center have repeatedly been asked NOT to park along the entire back side as this is being used for delivery trucks on a regular basis. Employees of the Center have, and continue to be asked to move their cars. A determination as to whether this is parking or delivery must be determined since we are not "allowed" to park in these spaces. 4) Pursuant to your "Parking Analysis ", before a final determination can be made as to the Total Parking Required (138) and the Total Parking Provided (129), the number of employees should be considered for ALL businesses. We believe this number would impact the final count (i.e., Karate, Allure Salon/Spa). 5) Re- striping the grated areas of the parking lot to code would also eliminate several parking spaces. 6) One of the tenants of the Mali has been threatened by the owners with the loss of his business if he does not go back to the City of Lino Lakes and make this parking issue "go away ". The owners were outraged that this matter was brought to the City's attention. This business owner was informed that the owners will continue to rent to whomever they please and the City will have nothing to say about it. Also, any cost that is incurred with this parking issue will be passed on to the current tenants. Therefore, we are asking the following: 1) Re- evaluation of the actual space of each business together with the number of employees; 2) Accurate evaluation of the number of cars per business during the high volume evening hours (5:00 p.m. — 8:00 p.m.). Keep in mind that the numbers for Karate are down extensively during the summer hours. 3) Projected growth numbers for each business over the next 2 to 5 years to determine how the parking will accommodate for growth. 4) A determination regarding the number of parking spaces behind the liquor store /gas station. Is it parking or is it an unloading/garbage zone? 5) Re- striping the grated areas to bring them up to code. 6) Acknowledgement that this issue is not about the tenants of the mall, but rather the owners and the City making sure that the parking ordinances are in compliance. It is our belief that the Spirit Hills Retail Center is clearly not meeting the City Ordinances based upon the types of businesses that require more parking than what is currently provided. Based upon this information, we would appreciate the City of Lino Lakes, working in conjunction with the owner, to do whatever is necessary to see that the mall is brought under compliance with these City Ordinances. We would appreciate any help you can give us in resolving this parking issue within Spirit Hills Retail Center. A response from the City Council would also be much appreciated. Thank you for your help!