HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/10/2007Council Packet•
REVISED
Monday
December 10, 2007
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Bergeson, Council Members Carlson, O'Donnell, Reinert & Stoltz
City Administrator: Gordon Heitke
Truth In Taxation Public Hearing
D Public Comment
➢ Call to Order and Roll Call
D Pledge of Allegiance
➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) December 10, 2007 (Check No. 81788 through
81869) in the amount of $92,662.49;
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No.2945 through
2992) in the amount of $15,164.26
Pg 4 -10
B) Consider Resolution No. 07 -203 Approving an Off -Sale Liquor Pg 11 -13
and Tobacco license for Eagle Liquor and Tobacco, 730 Apollo Dr,
(transfer of ownership to S & C Liquors, Inc.)
C) Consider Resolution No. 07 -200 Authorizing the Transfer of
Funds from the Area and Unit Fund to the Water Operating Fund
for Payment of 1996B G.O. Water Revenue Bond
D) Consider Resolution No. 07 -201 Authorizing the Transfer of
Funds from the Area and Unit Fund to the 2003A G.O.
Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund
E) Consider Resolution No. 07 -202 Authorizing the Transfer of
Funds from the Area and Unit Fund to the 2005B G.O.
Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund
Pg 14 -15
Pg 16 -17
Pg 18 -19
F) Consider Resolution No. 07 -204 Amending the City of Lino Lakes Pg 20 -26
Flexible Spending Accounts Plan
Council Agenda
-2-
REVISED
G) Consider Resolution No. 07 -206 Approving a temporary liquor
license for the Lino Lake Lions Club Annual Prime Rib Dinner,
March 15, 2008, at St. Joseph's Church, 171 Elm Street
None
n!
12/10/2007
Pg 27 -28
A) Consider second reading & passage of Ordinance No. 16 -07, Pg 29-
establishing the 2008 City Fee Schedule, Julie Bartell
Reading and roll call required
i) Consider Resolution No. 06 -206, Approving
summary publication of Ordinance 16 -07
A) Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -183 accepting the
donation of $7,000 from the Turtleman Triathalon to the
Police Department
None
Pg 31 -32
A) Consider 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 19 -07 Amending Pg 33 -36
Section 3., Subdivision B of the Zoning Ordinance Relating
to Minimum Lot Size for Unsewered Lots, Michael Grochala
B) Public Hearing and Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 18 -07, Pg 37 -40
Vacating Portions of Two Drainage and Utility Easements,
Lot 1, Block 9, Oakwood View, (135 Ash Street), Jeff Smyser
C) Consider Resolution No. 07 -194, Approving Payment Request Pg 41 -45
No. 2 (Final), 2007 Surface Water Management Project,
Outfall Cleaning, James E. Studenski
A) Consider approval of November 5, 2007 work session minutes
A) Consider approval of November 13, 2007 Canvassing Board
Minutes Council Members Stoltz and Reinert absent
B) Consider approval of November 26, 2007 Work Session
Minutes Mayor Bergeson absent
•
Pg 46
Pg 47 -48 •
•
•
•
Council Agenda -3-
REVISED
C) Consider approval of November 26, 2007 City Council
Meeting Minutes Mayor Bergeson absent
D) Receive from the Lino Lakes Charter Commission a
substitute amendment proposed to Charter Chapter VIII,
Public Improvements and Special Assessments
Property Acquisition for Lake Drive Improvement Project
12/10/2007
Pg 49 -54
Community Calendar— A Look Ahead
December 11 — December 17, 2007
Wednesday, December 12 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers
4 Monday, December 17 5:30 p.m., Community Room
4 Monday, December 17 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers
Planning & Zoning
Council Work Session
Council Meeting
•
•
iv Fax 1 evy
December 10. 2007
l:y` 1
(5
cto
City of Lino Lakes levy:
— General Levy for Operations
— Special Levies for Debt Service. Abatement
payments and PERA
— Council Goals, Additional Staff Position. Street
Maintenance, Equipment Replacement. Storm
Drainage Maintenance
City of Lino Lakes Tax Base grew 4.81%
t 3f.�D3i(?tic �( 1t� i
Adopted Prcliminary Levy
1v4VHC direct to Taxpayer
Levy received by City
A�MVHC to city from State
Levy for MVHC
Total Revenue to City
$8.866,956
( 280.000)
$8.586.956
280,000
-0-
$8.866.956
$8,700.000 --
58,200,000= 07.268,302
57,700,000 -..'.:.�....
$7,200.000-"
$6,700.000
56200,000
55,700,000-'
55,200.000-"
$4,700,000—'
$4,200,000'
$3,700,000-"
$3,200,000—
$2,700,000=
$2.200,000
$1.700,000
$1.200,000 -..
20115
its'
58.866,956
48,456.328. 4.85'5..
.7976.907 6.01.
9
2006
2007 2008
Special
• Debt
7 General
140.16104X.:'
20.0004”,,
100.000"..-
80,0 0
60.000%.
40.000 % -
?0.000%
0.000%
2005
2006
2007 2008 Prop
Other
- Lino Lakes
.1noLa ('o
Z.1 q)12
Other
5 ".
School
District
31 %_
Anoka
t'ount■
_ lstri °?lilt} @1
•
•
•
•
•
•
28
2I
14
2001
Pr
l
Tax Iisribu101
2000
2007 2008 Prop
Lino Lakes
8 Anoka Coon
School Dist
7 Spec Dist
C of
07'
C?llllitil�liIQ l
2008
rkct Value - $250.000 Market Value - $250.0
Ta Capacit} S2.500 Tax Capacity $2.500
Cit Tax Rate x .38994 Cite Tax Rate x .38997
City 'lax $975 C'ity Tax 5975
Tax
2006
Matl.et Value - $250.000
Tax Capacity $2.500
Cit\ Tax Rate \ .38994
{'itx ra $975
2007
4.8% increase in i'alue
Market Value - $262.000
Tax Capacity $2.620
Citr Tax Rate x .38997
Citti Fax 51,022
4.8%
'T
1 taI Pr p
i on testez
$5:200-
T $4.700.
0 $4.200'
t $3.700'
a $3.200. —i
1 $2,700:
$2.200
T 51,700
a $1.200
x
$200 - ,....:..::.,:
6150.000
0200.000 0300,000
Market Value
$400,000
2006
2006
2007
■
2008
Tax 1Z t R.an i t. is
Anoka
• 2005 - 9th out of 21 cities/townships
• 2006 - 8th out of 21 cities/townships
• 2007 - 9th out of 21 cities /townships
• 2008 - 10th out of 21 cities/townships
C.
Proposed 2008 Cienera.1
Opel g Budget
•
•
•
•
•
•
ake:,
BtldgLt I t i 1 a io
• February - May - City Council establishes
budget priorities and objectives at Goal
Setting work session
• June/July - Departmental budgets are
preparec
• August 22 - Council reviews proposed budget
• September 10 - Council approves
preliminary Tax Levy and Budget & sets
public hearing date
• September 15 - Preliminary Tax Levy, Budget
& public hearing dates certified to County
Auditor
l Ih
• Mid - November - County mails notice of
proposed property tax
• December 10 - Council holds Truth in
Taxation hearing on proposed 2008 Budget
and Tax Levy
• December 17 - Council adopts final 2008
Budget and Tax Levy
• By December 28 - City certifies final 2008 Tax
Levy and Budget to County Auditor
Cit
City of Lino Lakes budget includes:
- Adjustments in Revenue and Expenditures to lower
preliminary budget at adoption
- Funding for achieving City Council goals
- Finish Comprehensive Plan Update
- 1.0 new staff position
- Amounts for capital needs - capital equipment, office
equipment, computers, etc.
- Increased amount for street maintenance per Pavement
Management Plan
- Resources for Storm Drainage maintenance projects
- Contingency for unknowns
- Personnel cost adjustments
S10,000,000
59,000,000
58.000,000
S7,000,000
56,000.006
55,000,000
54,000,000
Li
-)0()5-2,008
2005 2006 2007 2008
0
7 H1U.tHH1 �,
6.000..01
5.000,000
4.000,000
3.000,000
2.(001,01H7�
12131106
t
12'31/07,4
2000 13‘010 61
' Cia,ll1Ct akeS
•
•
•
•
•
C
Prop
Licenses & Intergovemt
Permits 6.63°%
6.48"A
Tfrs & &disc
2.72%
Chgsfor
Fines Service ,Interest
1.11% 2.53% 202%
2 (il)°2,
sed
Public
Services
26.97 %
Tfrs & Other
7.98%
Administration
13.89%
Public Safety
39.80%
Community
Development
11.37%
• Debt service
increased from
2007
sioo
5700
• Water rates under 5500
re\ iC\\ 5300
5100
Thous
$ 2006 '
2007;
2008'
Provide emergenc}
equipment_ upgrade
lift station # 6. SctNcr
Rehab in 1 ake5 Addn.
•
Sewer rates under
reFlCNN
51,700
S1,500
$1300 titzii^
S1,100'
S900
S700 -`
s5(10
Thous 2006 2007 2008
1.325
4 Fate
•
•
•
•
•
:' t \ of I i no
i tl
Pt
1f's
\
11,111i OU to 1tte►ndi11 <_;.
December 10, 2007
•
EXPENDITURES
DECEMBER 12, 2007
•
Date: 11/30/2007 Time 07:36:54 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 6760 676D
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
•
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 520.71 520.71 .00 .00
007376 ST. PAUL WINTER CARNIVAL /HERITAGE FOUNDA 1 1,125.00 1,125.00 .0D .00
Grand Totals: 2 1,645.71 1,645.71 .OD .00*
•
•
Date: 11/30/2007 Time: 07:42:41 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
1 g =s: Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 6747 6747
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Options: Detail / Summary: S
Sort: N
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 1 212.60 212.80 .D0 .00
000022 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY, INC. 1 123.65 123.65 .00 .00
000064 ROWEKAMP ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 800.00 B00.00 .00 .00
000080 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 1 44.47 44.47 .D0 .00
000094 PEARSON BROTHERS, INC. 1 6,776.82 6,776.82 .00 .00
000107 R & D BA1"1�kIES, INC. 1 105.56 105.56 .00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 1 37.85 37.85 .00 .00
000225 WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH, INC. 1 65.00 65.00 .00 .00
000227 DELL MARKETING L.P. 1 201.30 201.30 .00 .DD
00022B ANOKA COUNTY ELECTIONS 1 85.88 85.88 .00 .00
Aillg318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 210.50 210.50 .00 .00
_,0389 CUB FOODS 1 25.74 25.74 .00 .00
000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 104.24 104.24 .00 .00
000490 ASLESON, MARTY 1 110.47 110.47 .00 .00
000500 ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING OFFICERS MN 1 275.00 275.00 .00 .00
000537 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 1 1,305.60 1,305.60 .00 .00
000539 TARGET 1 632.16 632.16 .00 .00
000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 1 347.37 347.37 .00 .0D
000604 RYLANDER, VERNON 1 132.98 132.98 .00 .00
000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 464.38 464.38 .00 .00
000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 1 74.28 74.28 .00 .00
000880 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. 1 412.86 412.86 .00 .00
Date: 11/30/2007 Time: 07:42:41 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount
Dist
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 130.20 130.20 .D0 .00
001016 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1 11,159.35 11,159.35 .00 .00
001043 CENTRAL LANDSCAPING, INC. 1 729.53 729.53 .00 .00
001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 2,593.67 2,593.67 .D0 .00
001148 EGAN OIL COMPANY 1 5,714.60 5,714.60 .00 .D0
001270 DALCO, INC. 3 399.75 399.75 .D0 .00
001360 E. L. REINHARDT COMPANY, INC. 1 149.30 149.30 .00 .00
001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 184.90 184.90 .00 .00
00 1395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 740.10 740.1D .00 .00
001475 TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1 450.00 450.00 .00 .00
001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 2 47.99 47.99 .00 .00
D01752 MOONEN, PATRICK 1 151.41 151.41 .00 .00
D01771 HALVORSON CONCRETE, INC. 1 5,598.00 5,598.00 .00 .00
001840 HIT,T,PSHEIM, TIM 1 175.34 175.34 .00 .00
001675 HUELMAN, PAT 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
001881 HUGO HEATING AND COOLING 1 130.00 130.00 .00 0
001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 2,236.76 2,236.76 .00
002110 KATE AUTO PARTS, INC. 1 153.87 153.87 .00 .00
002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 21.77 21.77 .00 .00
002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 341.16 341.16 .00 .D0
002355 LINDY, GEORGE 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .D0
002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 76.88 76.88 .D0 .00
002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 1,500.24 1,500.24 .DD .00
002666 RICHARDS, BRIAN 1 275.00 275.00 .00 .00
002694 AMERICAN MESSAGING 1 19.60 19.6D .00 .00
002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 257.03 257.03 .00 .00
003070 MTI DISTIBUTING, INC. 1 47.75 47.75 .DD .00
•
Date: 11/30/2007 Time 07:42:41
City of Lino Lakes operator: JAL Page: 3
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Discount
dor Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 1 299.85 299.85 .00 .00
003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 1 240.26 240.26 .00 .0D
003228 NORTH AMERICAN SALT COMPANY, INC. 2 5,104.97 5,104.97 .00 .00
083250 XCEL ENERGY 1 7,179.51 7,179.51 .00 .00
D03261 BRUGGGEMAN HOMES 2 4,900.00 4,900.00 .00 .00
D03492 PETTY CASH 1 286.98 286.98 .00 .00
D03600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 4 360.27 360.27 .00 .00
003617 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 1 374.88 374.88 .00 .00
00370D TEE JAY NORTH, INC. 1 149.00 149.00 .0D .D0
DC3848 SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL GROUP, INC. 1 533.44 533.44 .0D .D0
003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 48.00 46.00 .00 .DO
004099 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 1 1,883.29 1,883.29 .00 .00
004125 ST. PAUL CITY OF 1 80.25 80.25 .D0 .00
004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 107.53 107.53 .DD .00
004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 169.98 169.98 .00 .00
04350 T.K.D.A. 1 326.13 326.13 .00 .00
.367 TASCHUK, PAM 1 50.00 50.00 .0D .00
004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 1 265.75 265.75 .00 .00
D84590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 2 680.99 680.99 .00 .D0
004660 URICH, TRACEY 1 39.29 39.29 .D0 .00
D04720 VIGER, JEAN 1 31.94 31.94 .00 .00
004788 SPRINT 1 75.95 75.95 .00 .00
007369 JOHNSON, JOSEPH 1 99.96 99.96 .00 .00
007374 GERLACH, SHARON 1 90.00 90.00 .00 .00
D07375 KANGAS TANK, INC. 1 1,890.00 1,890.00 .00 .00
007377 WESTCO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 1 17,836.80 17,836.80 .00 .00
007378 ANDERSON, KAREN 1 1,429.91 1,429.91 .00 .00
•
Date: 11/30/2007 Time: 07:42:41 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 4
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount
007379 BOTACS TACTICAL 1 69.78 69.78 .00 .DD
00738D FRA2TALONE COMPANIES, INC. 1 178.75 178.75 .DD .DO
900477 PARTS ASSOCIATES, INC. PAI 1 135.87 135.67 .00 .00
900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 1 139.34 139.34 .00 .0D
Grand Totals: 91 91,016.78 91,016.78 .00 .00*
•
•
Date: 11/30/2007 Time: 07:49:40 Operator: JAL
Ranges:
Page: 1
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Fund: (A)
Dept Id: (A)
Program: (A)
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Schedule Journal #: (R) 6761 6762
Bank #: (A)
Options: Print Ranges /Options: Y # of copies: 1
Page on Department: N
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
CENTRAL PENSION FUND PAYROLL WITHHOLDING 1,305.60
MINNESOTA STATE RETI PAYROLL WITHHOLDING 11,159.35
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAY TERRY J MECKLE 001401177 257.03
Total for Department 12,721.98*
MAYOR /COUNCIL TARGET H TREATS 19.14
MAYOR /COUNCIL BROADWAY AWARDS, INC PLAQUE 74.28
MAYOR /COUNCIL VIGER, JEAN REIMBURSE C TREE SKIRT 31.94
MAYOR /COUNCIL ST. PAUL WINTER CARN AMBASSADOR PROGRAM 1,125.00
Total for Department 401 1,250.36*
ADMINISTRATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER 18.04
ADMINISTRATION PRESS PUBLICATIONS, ADVERTISING /ADVISORY BOA 97.92
ADMINISTRATION PRESS PUBLICATIONS, ADVERTISING /ADVISORY BOA 97.92
ADMINISTRATION SPRINT MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER 75.95
Total for Department 402 289.83*
ELECTIONS ANOKA COUNTY ELECTIO ELECTION ENVELOPES 85.88
Total for Department 403 85.88*
CHARTER TIMESAVER OFF -SITE S NOV 1 /CHARTER COMMISSION 265.75
Total for Department 405 265.75*
SENIORS NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER 18.07
Total for Department 406 18.07*
PLANNING & ZONING ROWEKAMP ASSOCIATES, CLASS /JEFF S 800.00
PLANNING & ZONING TARGET COOKIES /DRINKS 16.23
PLANNING & ZONING PRESS PUBLICATIONS, ADVERTISING /COMP PLAN OP 120.03
PLANNING & ZONING SRF CONSULTING GROUP TRANSPORTATION PLAN 1,883.29
Total for Department 416 2,819.55*
COMM DEV NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER 18.04
Total for Department 418 18.04*
POLICE DELL MARKETING L.P. TONER 201.30
POLICE ASSOCIATION OF TRAIN LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING 275.00
POLICE TARGET MICROWAVE /BOXES /OFF SUPP 346.79
POLICE ASPEN MILLS, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES 347.37
POLICE BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN TOW /'87 S10 BLAZER 119.83
Date: 11/30/2007 Time 07:49:40 Operator: JAL
Department
Page: 2
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name
Description
Amount
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
TASER INTERNATIONA,
KATH AUTO PARTS, INC
IMAGE PRINTING & GRA
METRO SALES INCORPOR
XCEL ENERGY
PETTY CASH /LLPD
PETTY CASH /LLPD
PETTY CASH /LLPD
ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF
SPARTAN PROMOTIONAL
SHRED -IT, INC.
ST. PAUL CITY OF
STREICHER'S, INC.
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED,
ANDERSON, KAREN
BOTACH TACTICAL
CORPORATE EXPRESS, I
HANDLE /BATTERY PACK
LOCKOUT TOOL /WEDGE
PRINTING LEAVE REQUESTS
COPIER MAINTENANCE
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
COPIES /SUPPLIES /FOOD
MEETINGS /GAS
PARTS /SUPPLIES
RANGE TIME /AUGUST
LANYARDS
DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT
RADIO SERVICE / MAINTENANC
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
REIMBURSE EDUCATIONAL EX
FIREARM SUPPLIES
PRINTER SUPPLIES
Total for Department 420
BUILDING INSPECTIONS RYLANDER, VERNON REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW.
BUILDING INSPECTIONS NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
BUILDING INSPECTIONS MOONEN, PATRICK REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
Total for Department 422
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, CLASS 5
CENTRAL LANDSCAPING, EROSION BLANKET
EARL ANDERSON ASSOCI STREET SIGNS
NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
HALVORSON CONCRETE,
MENARDS, INC.
MENARDS, INC.
AMERICAN MESSAGING
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
NORTH AMERICAN SALT
CURB REPAIR
CONCRETE MIX /BLAST
SIGN BOARDS
MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER
STREET SIGNS
HIGHWAY SALT
XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SO ASPHALT
JOHNSON, JOSEPH REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
WESTCO ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTOR /'07 SURFACE W
Total for Department 430
AMERICAN FASTENER & WASHERS /NUTS
EGAN OIL COMPANY GASOHOL
FOREST LAKE FORD, IN ADDITIVE
FOREST LAKE FORD, IN SPARK PLUGS
LEEF BROTHER, INC. SHOP TOWELS
MTI DISTIBUTING, INC FILTER /OIL
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS BATTERY /PUMP
PARTS ASSOCIATES, IN PAINTS
Total for Department 431
450.00
153.87
341.16
115.00
3.38
93.00
125.01
68.97
374.88
533.44
48.00
80.25
107.53
680.99
1,429.91
69.78
139.34
6,104.80*
132.98
149.21
151.41
433.60*
412.86
729.53
184.90
35.12
5,066.00
58.97
17.91
3.92
299.85
5,104.97
4,704.37
169.98
99.96
17,836.80
34,725.14*
37.85
5,714.60
11.69
36.30
21.77
47.75
240.26
135.87
6,246.09*
Date: 11/30/2007 Time: 07:49:40 Operator: JAL
Department
Page: 3
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name Description
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
RECREATION
RECREATION
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
R & D BATTERIES, INC BATTERIES
WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH STRIKE PLATE
AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APP MAT RENTAL
C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES
CIRCLE PINES, CITY 0 MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
DALCO, INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
HUGO HEATING AND COO SERVICE IGNITOR
METRO SALES INCORPOR COPIER MAINTENANCE
TEE JAY NORTH, INC. ACTIVATE SWITCH /HANDICAP
Total for Department 432
A & L SUPERIOR SOD C
ANOKA COUNTY
CIRCLE PINES, CITY 0
NEXTEL COMMUNICATION
HUELMAN, PAT
LINDY, GEORGE
XCEL ENERGY
TASCHUK, PAM
URICH, TRACEY
SOD
TAXES/28- 31 -22 -44 -0035
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
QUARTERLY STIPEND
QUARTERLY STIPEND
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
QUARTERLY STIPEND
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
Total for Department 450
E. L. REINHARDT COMP PADLOCK
NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
Total for Department 451
ASLESON, MARTY REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
Total for Department 461
Total for Fund 101
GERLACH, SHARON REIMBURSE PROGRAM EEC
Total for Department
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS CUB FOODS
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS TARGET
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS RICHARDS, BRIAN
OTHER
APPLE CIDER /PROGRAM REC
COOKIES /GIFT CARDS
PROGRAM REC PROGRAM
Total for Department 205
Total for Fund 201
PEARSON BROTHERS, IN CONTRACTOR '07 SEALCOAT
Total for Department 499
Total for Fund 421
FRATTALONE COMPANIES REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER
Total for Department
Amount
105.56
65.00
210.50
130.20
2,526.31
399.75
130.00
1,385.24
149.00
5,101.56*
212.80
101.92
67.36
267.35
50.00
75.00
111.70
50.00
39.29
975.42*
149.30
18.06
167.36*
110.47
35.78
146.25*
71,369.68*
90.00
90.00*
25.74
250.00
275.00
550.74*
640.74*
6,776.82
6,776.82*
6,776.82*
- 221.25
- 221.25*
Date: 11/30/2007 Time: 07:49:40 Operator: JAL
Department
Page: 4
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name
Description
Amount
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
NORTHERN WATER WORKS
ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER
CIRCLE PINES POST OF
NEXTEL COMMUNICATION
HALVORSON CONCRETE,
HILLESHEIM, TIM
AMERICAN MESSAGING
XCEL ENERGY
KANGAS TANK, INC.
BALL /NIPPLE -CURB STOP RE
FITTINGS /HOSE
UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
CURB REPAIR
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW
MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER
MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
WATER TOWER REPAIR
Total for Department 494
Total for Fund 601
CIRCLE PINES POST OF UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE
NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
INFRATECH TECHNOLOGI BENCH /INVERT REPAIR
AMERICAN MESSAGING MONTHLY SERVICE /NOVEMBER
XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /OCTOBER
Total for Department 495
Total for Fund 602
ANOKA COUNTY
ANOKA COUNTY
BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN
BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN
BRUGGEMAN HOMES
BRUGGEMAN HOMES
PRESS PUBLICATIONS,
T.K.D.A.
FRATTALONE COMPANIES
Total for
TAXES /09- 31 -22 -12 -0016
TAXES/09- 31 -22 -22 -0031
TOW /'02 TOYOTA CAMRY
TOW /'91 CHEV CAPRICE
7336 STAGECOACH TRAIL /RE
7344 STAGECOACH TRAIL /RE
ADVERTISING /VACATION -OAK
EAGLE BROOK
REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER
Department
Total for Fund 801
Grand Total
123.65
44.47
260.36
129.65
532.00
175.34
11.76
1,352.13
1,890.00
4,519.36*
4,298.11*
260.35
50.78
2,236.76
3.92
1,007.93
3,559.74*
3,559.74*
1.16
1.16
214.07
130.48
2,450.00
2,450.00
44.40
326.13
400.00
6,017.40*
6,017.40*
92,662.49*
• CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
•
Check Register FIRE GL
GL Posting Period(s): 11/07 - 11/07
Check Issue Date(s): 11/16/2007 - 11/30/2007
Page: 1
Nov 30, 2007 02:57pm
Per Date Check No Vendor No Payee
11/07 11/19/07 2945 20140 VOID - MILO BENNETT
11/07 11/19/07 2982
11/07 11/19/07 2983
11/07 11/30/07 2984
11/07 11/30/07 2985
11/07 11/30/07 2986
11/07 11/30/07 2987
Total 2987
Void Check
20140 MILO BENNETT
20140 MILO BENNETT
30465 CENTENNIAL FIREFIGHTERS RELIE
30480 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES
50120 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT,
11/07 11/30/07 2988 70578 GRAINGER
11/07 11/30/07 2989 120450 CITY OF LINO LAKES
11/07 11/30/07
11/07 11/30/07
11/07 11/30/07
Totals:
2990 200390 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
2991 210400 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS, INC
2992 220200 VERIZON WIRELESS
Invoice Description
STATION 2 FAUCET
REPAIR
REPLACES CK 2945
3 SETS OF BINOCULERS
4TH QTR PMT
STATION 1 UTILITIES
RESCUE 21 MTC
RESCUE 11 MTC
SWIVEL
4TH QTR COMMON
AREA CHARGE
STATION 1 DOOR MTC
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
Inv Amount
1,368.76- M
1,339.31
363.48
6,125.00
125.02
2,850.95
132.97
2,983.92
67.84
4,528.25
909.52
88.34
2.34
15,164.26
V
•
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC
VOTE REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND:
AGENDA ITEM 1B
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
December 10, 2007
Consider Resolution No. 07 -203, Approving
Off -Sale Liquor and Tobacco License for
Eagle Liquor and Tobacco (transfer of ownership)
Simple Majority (3/5 Vote Required)
An application has been submitted by Sudhan and Christina Manandhar, president and
vice president respectively of S & C Liquor, Inc., requesting approval of an off -sale
liquor and tobacco license for Eagle Liquor and Tobacco at 730 Apollo Drive, Suite 190.
The business is being purchased by S & C Liquor, Inc.
The application is complete and the related fees have been paid, including investigation
fees. Insurance information has been provided to the City as required.
The Lino Lakes Police Department has conducted a background investigation relative to
this application and found no information on the principal applicants that would give a
specific reason to deny the application.
In accordance with the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances, Section 701 relating to Liquor
Licensing and Section 602 relating to Cigarette Sales, this application requires approval
by the City Council.
The applicant is aware that approval is subject to all the provisions and conditions of the
laws of the city, state and federal government.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 07 -203
2. Deny Resolution No. 07 -203
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 1
Council Member
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 07 -203
APPROVING ISSUANCE OF OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
AND TOBACCO LIQNCE
FOR EAGLE LIQUOR
(TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes met at its regularly scheduled
meeting on December 10, 2007, and;
WHEREAS, the city has been informed that Eagle Liquor and Tobacco, located at 730
Apollo Drive, Suite 190, will come under new ownership; and
WHEREAS, the transfer of an intoxicating liquor license can only be accomplished by
application for a new license; and
WHEREAS, the corporate entity S & C Liquors, Inc.(Sudhan and Christina
Mandandhar) has applied for a liquor and tobacco license to do business as Eagle
Liquor and Tobacco; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department of the City of Lino Lakes has conducted an
investigation of the applicants, and;
WHEREAS, said application indicates compliance with the city code concerning liquor
and tobacco licensing, and therefore the applicant qualifies for such license and;
WHEREAS, the applicant has provided proof of insurance as required and paid the
necessary fees;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
hereby approves an Off -Sale liquor license and tobacco license, effective upon state
approval, for Eagle Liquor and Tobacco, subject to all the fees, provisions and
conditions of the laws of the city, state and of the federal government.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of December, 2007.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
•
•
•
•
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 'IC
STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek
MEETING DATE 12/10/07
TOPIC Resolution No. 07 -200 Authorizing the Transfer of funds from
Area and Unit Fund to the Water Operating Fund
VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority
BACKGROUND
Each year a transfer is budgeted from the Area -and Unit Fund to the Water Operating Fund to
pay principal and interest on the 1996B G.O. Water Revenue Bonds. This transfer is a part of
the funding mechanism set up in the original bond documents. The amount of the transfer is
$141,199. It is staffs recommendation that Council authorize this transfer as budgeted.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt Resolution 07 -200.
2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration.
3. Deny Resolution 07 -200.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 07-200
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE AREA AND
UNIT FUND TO THE WATER OPERATING FUND FOR PAYMENT OF 1996B G.O.
WATER REVENUE BOND
WHEREAS, a transfer was budgeted in 2007 to the Water Operating Fund from the Area
and Unit Fund to cover principal and interest on the 1996E G.O. Water
Revenue Bonds due in 2007, and
WHEREAS, it is staffs recommendation that this transfer be completed effective December
31, 2007.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, that the
following transfer be authorized and recorded effective December 31, 2007:
Increase Decrease
Water Operating Fund (601) $141,199
Area and Unit Fund (406) $141,199
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 10th day of December, 2007.
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
—15—
John Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
•
•
•
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1D
STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek
MEETING DATE 12/10/07
TOPIC Resolution No. 07 -201 Authorizing the Transfer of Funds
from the Area and Unit Fund to the 2003A G.O.
Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund
VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority
BACKGROUND
The 2003A Debt Service Fund was established to service the debt on several 2003
improvement projects and to refund the 1996A bond issue. The 1996A debt was to be
retired using special assessments and resources of the Area and Unit Fund.
Resolution 07 -201 would transfer the necessary funds from the Area and Unit Fund for
2006 debt service needs.
The amount of the transfer is $410,000.00. It is staffs recommendation that the City
Council approve Resolution 07 -201 authorizing this transfer.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt Resolution 07 -201.
2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration.
3. Deny Resolution 07 -201.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
Council Member introduced the fallowing resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 07 -201
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE AREA AND
UNIT FUND TO THE 2003A G.O. IMPROVEMENT BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND
WHEREAS, the 2003A Bond Debt Service Fund has a deficit balance, and
WHEREAS, a portion of this issue refunded the original 1996A bond issue, and
WHEREAS, the refunded portion of this bond issue was originally sold to finance 1996
Construction Projects, and
WHEREAS, resources of the Area and Unit Fund were pledged toward the retirement of
the 1996A bond issue.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following transfer be adopted:
Increase Decrease
Imp. & Refunding Bonds 2003A (324) $410,000.00
Area and Unit Fund (406) $410,000.00
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 10th day of December, 2007.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
•
•
•
•
•
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 1 E
STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek
MEETING DATE 12/10/07
TOPIC Resolution No. 07 -202 Authorizing the Transfer of Funds from the
Area and Unit Fund to the 2005B G.O. Improvement Bond Debt
Service Fund
VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority
BACKGROUND
The 1998A Debt Service Fund was established to service the debt on the 1997 and 1998
improvement projects. The 1998A issue was subsequently refunded by the 2005B issue. The
original debt was to be retired using special assessments to benefited properties and resources
of the Area and Unit Fund. The 2005B fund is currently in a deficit situation. Resolution 07 -202
would transfer the necessary funds from the Area and Unit Fund to eliminate this deficit.
The amount of the transfer is $480,899.00. It is staff's recommendation that the City Council
approve Resolution 07 -202 authorizing this transfer.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt Resolution 07 -202.
2. Refer back to Staff for further consideration.
3. Deny Resolution 07 -202.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 07 -202
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE AREA AND
UNIT FUND TO THE 2005B G.O. IMPROVEMENT BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND
WHEREAS, the 2005B Bond Debt Service Fund has a deficit balance; and,
WHEREAS, a portion of this issue refunded the original 1998A bond issue, and
WHEREAS, these bonds were originally sold to finance 1997 and 1998 Construction
Projects, and
WHEREAS, resources of the Area and Unit Fund were pledged toward the retirement of
the 1998A Bond issue.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following transfer be adopted:
Increase
Imp. Bonds 2005B (328) $480,899
Area and Unit Fund (406)
Decrease
$480,899
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 10th day of December, 2007.
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
—19—
John Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
•
•
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM I
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Al Rolek
MEETING DATE: December 10, 2007
TOPIC:
Resolution 07- , Resolution Amending the City of
Lino Lakes Flexible Spending Accounts Plan (the
"Plan')
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote)
BACKGROUND:
It is recommended that the city's Flexible Spending Accounts Plan be amended
to incorporate any changes that may have occurred. The last plan document
was updated in 2006.
The following resolution incorporates one change to the current plan document.
It is:
• The Plan shall make available to Eligible Employees the health
savings account (HSA) benefit on a pre -tax basis
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution 07- .
2. Return to Staff for further review.
2. Deny Resolution 07- .
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 07-
RESOLUTION AMENDING AND RESTATING THE CITY OF LINO LAKES FLEXIBLE
SPENDING ACCOUNTS PLAN, (the "Plan ")
the plan was adopted per Resolution No. 78 -90 with the effective
date of January 1, 1991, and
the plan was amended and restated per Resolution No. 95 -156 with
an effective date of January 1, 1996, and again per Resolution No.
00 -119 with an effective date of January 1, 2001 and again per
Resolution No. 03 -07 with an effective date of January 1, 2003, and
again per Resolution No. 05 -181,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes wishes to amend the plan document effective
January 1, 2008, to include the following;
•The Plan shall make available to Eligible Employees the health
savings account (HSA) benefit on a pre -tax basis.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lino
Lakes that:
1. The City of Lino Lakes Flexible Spending Accounts Plan be
amended and adopted in the form presented to the City
council effective as of January 1, 2008.
2. That any authorized persons of the Employer are hereby
authorized to make such contributions from the funds of the
Employer as are necessary to carry out the provision of said
plan at any time.
3. That in the event any conflict arises between the provisions
of said Plan and the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 ( ERISA) or any other applicable law or
regulation (as such law or regulation may be interpreted or
amended), the City shall resolve such conflict in a manner
which complies with ERISA or such law or regulation.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of December 2007.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
•
•
•
•
•
•
PLAN AMENDMENT TO HE
City of Lino Lakes
Flexible Benefit Plan
Pursuant to the authority retained by the Employer under Section 8.1 of the Flexible
Benefit Plan (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
Effective January 1, 2008:
• the provisions of the Plan referencing the
Section 1.2 Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to increase the social insurance
protection of Eligible Employees by making available to those employees different combinations
of accident and health care benefits, dental care benefits, health care reimbursement benefits,
dependent care reimbursement benefits, Health Savings Account (HSA) benefits, and direct
compensation. The Plan is intended to comply with the provisions of Sections 79, 104, 105, 125,
129, and 223 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder.
Section 2.1 Definitions
(k) "Health Savings Account" or "HSA" means a health savings
account established under Code Section 223. Such arrangements are individual
trusts or custodial accounts, each separately established and maintained by an
Employee with a qualified trustee or custodian.
(1) "High Deductible Health Plan" or "HDHP" means, generally, a
health insurance plan established by the Employer with an annual deductible of
not less than $1,000 for self -only coverage and twice that amount for family
coverage, as indexed for cost -of -living adjustments. The definition of HDHP
shall be consistent with Section 223(c)(2) of the Code.
Section 4.3 Employer Contributions. In its discretion, the Employer may make
contributions to the Plan on behalf of the Participants. Any such contributions shall be made at
such rates and subject to such conditions as are established and applied on a uniform basis by the
Employer. Such contributions shall be contributed on such date or dates during the Plan Year as
the Employer determines in its sole discretion. Employer contributions shall be made only on
behalf of Participants who are currently employed by the Employer on the date that the
contribution is made. Employer contributions shall be automatically applied to pay the
Participant's cost of any benefits elected by the Participant. Employer Contributions that are
intended for a Participant's HSA may only be contributed by the Participant to the HSA. They
may not be allocated towards other benefits under the Plan. Participants shall be informed prior
to the commencement of each Plan Year of the amount, if any, of such employer contributions to
be made during the Plan Year.
Section 4.5 Revocation or Changes in Benefit Elections. A Participant's benefit
election for any Plan Year shall be irrevocable during the Plan Year, except that (a) the Employer
may limit or reduce a Participant's contributions allocable to certain benefits in accordance with
Section 4.9, and (b) if there is a Status Change, a Participant shall be entitled to change the
Participant's election of benefits on a prospective basis in a manner that is consistent with the
Status Change; (c) as further described in Section 4.6, an election to contribute to an HSA may
be changed at any time on a prospective basis.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant may switch from Limited - Purpose Health Care
Reimbursement Coverage to General - Purpose Health Care Reimbursement Coverage at any time
during a Period of Coverage up to and including the last day of the Plan Year, provided, that a
Participant may not make a corresponding Election Change to increase or decrease Pretax
Contributions for Health Care Reimbursement Coverage, unless the Election Change is
consistent with a Change in Status. If a Participant changes from Limited - Purpose Health Care
Reimbursement Coverage to General- Purpose Health Care Reimbursement Coverage, his or her
Pretax Contributions and reimbursements under the Limited- Purpose plan shall be taken into
account in determining the amount of coverage available under the General - Purpose plan for the
balance of the Plan Year. Medical Care expenses incurred prior to the date that a Participant
changes from the Limited - Purpose plan to the General - Purpose plan, but not previously
reimbursed, shall be payable from the General- Purpose plan (if sufficient coverage remains in the
Limited Purpose plan at the time of reimbursement), and a corresponding reduction shall be
made to the coverage available under the General Purpose plan.
Section 4.6 Election Change for HSA Benefits. A Participant who has enrolled in
the HDHP and is an eligible individual under Section 223(c)(1) of the Code may start or stop an
election to contribute to an HSA, or increase or decrease the amount of the election, as long as
the change is effective in the following month. Rules that govern election changes following a
"Change in Status" or a "change in Cost or Coverage" do not apply to Employer contributions or
Pretax Contribution to HSAs.
5.2.2 Health Care Reimbursement Coverage. A Participant may elect to
receive health care reimbursement coverage under one of two separate plans:
(1) a plan for General- Purpose Health Care Reimbursement Coverage, or (2) a
plan for Limited - Purpose Health Care Reimbursement Coverage. General -
Purpose Health Care Reimbursement Coverage shall be available to Participants
who do not intend to contribute to an HSA and are not "eligible individuals"
under Section 223(c)(1) of the Code. Limited - Purpose Health Care
Reimbursement Coverage shall be available to Participants who have elected
coverage under the HDHP and intend to contribute to an HSA. Limited- Purpose
Health Care Reimbursement Coverage shall also be available to Participants
whose spouses are covered under an HDHP of another employer, so that those
spouses remain eligible to contribute to an HSA. Both General - Purpose and
Limited Purpose Health Care Reimbursement Coverage plans are governed by
the terms and conditions of this paragraph 5.2.2.
(a) Maximum Coverage Amounts. Participants
receiving General Purpose Health Care Reimbursement
Coverage may elect to receive medical reimbursement coverage
of up to a maximum coverage of Three Thousand Dollars
($3,000) per Plan Year. Participants receiving Limited - Purpose
Health Care Reimbursement Coverage may elect to receive
medical reimbursement coverage of up to a maximum coverage
of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000) per Plan Year.
•
•
•
•
•
(b) Health Care Reimbursement Charge. Prior to
the commencement of each Plan Year, the Employer shall
determine and communicate to Participants the annual rate of the
Health Care Reimbursement Charge for each dollar of health
care reimbursement coverage for the forthcoming Plan Year. A
Participant's Health Care Reimbursement Charge shall be
payable from the Participant's available Employer Contributions
or Pretax Contributions on a monthly or other periodic basis
during the Plan Year as determined by the Employer and
communicated to Participants.
(c) Health Care Reimbursement Benefits. Subject
to (imitations contained in other provisions of this Plan, a
Participant receiving General - Purpose Health Care
Reimbursement Coverage who incurs expenses for Medical Care
attributable to the Participant or the Participant's spouse or
Dependents during the Participant's Period of Coverage for a
Plan Year shall be entitled to receive from the Employer full
reimbursement for the entire amount of such expenses to the
extent of the maximum amount of coverage elected by the
Participant for that Plan Year. A Participant receiving Limited -
Purpose Health Care Reimbursement Coverage who incurs
expenses attributable to the Participant or the Participant's
spouse or Dependents for [dental expenses, vision expenses,
preventative care expenses that fall within the safe harbor
described in IRS Notice 2004 -23, and Medical Care expenses
that are incurred after the HDHP deductible has been satisfied],
shall be entitled to receive from the Employer full
reimbursement for the entire amount of such expenses to the
extent of the maximum amount of coverage elected by the
Participant for that Plan Year. The Employer shall pay all such
expenses to the Participant upon the presentation of
documentation of such expenses in a form prescribed by the
Employer, which shall include satisfactory third party evidence
of the amount of the expense and the date(s) incurred. In
addition, upon presentation of a claim, a Participant shall
expressly represent that the item for which a claim is made is not
subject to reimbursement under any policy described in
paragraph 5.2.2(d) or from any other source. In its discretion,
the Employer may pay any of such expenses directly, in which
event it shall be relieved of all further responsibility with respect
to that particular expense. These expenses shall be paid
periodically during the Plan Year upon receipt during the prior
month of a claim complying with Plan requirements and totaling
at least Ten Dollars ($10), and by following the close of the
Plan Year upon receipt no later than of a claim (no minimum)
complying with Plan requirements.
(d) Limitations on Health Care Reimbursement Benefits.
Anything in the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, no
Participant shall be entitled to benefits under this paragraph
5.2.2:
(i) In the event and to the extent that, the
reimbursement or payment is covered under any
insurance policy or policies, whether paid for by
the Employer or the Participant, or under any
other health and accident plan by whomever
maintained. If there is such a policy or plan in
effect providing for reimbursement or payment,
in whole or in part, then to the extent of the
coverage under that policy or plan, the Plan
shall be relieved of any liability; or
(if) To the extent that the expense has been
submitted for reimbursement from the
Participant's Dependent Care Reimbursement
Account or under any similar program or plan
maintained by some other person or entity.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, in the
event that an expense for Medical Care could be
reimbursed from either a Participant's Health
Care Reimbursement Coverage or a
Participant's HSA, the Participant's Health Care
Reimbursement Coverage shall pay first, until
such coverage is exhausted, unless the
Participant directs that the HSA pay first. In no
event may the same expense be reimbursed
under both Health Care Reimbursement
Coverage and an HSA.
(e) Unused Benefits. If following the final payment
of reimbursement benefits for eligible expenses incurred during
the Period of Coverage for any Plan Year, any amount remains
in a Participant's Health Care Reimbursement Account for that
Plan Year, such amount shall be returned to the Plan, and
Participant shall have no further claim to that amount.
(f) Separate Written Plan. For purposes of the
Code, paragraph 5.2.2 shall constitute a separate written plans
providing for the reimbursement of Medical Care expenses. To
the extent necessary, other provisions of the Plan are
incorporated by reference in paragraph 5.2.2.
5.2.8. HSA Benefits.
(a) Employee Pretax Contributions. A Participant who has enrolled
in the HDHP and is an eligible individual under Section 223(c)(1) of the Code
may elect to have a portion of his or her compensation forwarded by the
Employer to an HSA established with one or more designated trustees or
custodians (an "eligible HSA "). If a Participant elects to contribute to an eligible
HSA, the employee's cash compensation will be reduced, and an amount equal
to the reduction will be forwarded to the employee's HSA.
(b) Employer contributions. The Employer may contribute directly
to the HSA of a Participant, outside of the Plan; subject to the comparability
rules under Code section 4980G. In the alternative, the Employer may
-25-
•
•
•
•
•
DATED:
contribute an amount through the Plan that is intended for the HSA of a
Participant, without regard to the comparability rules, and the Participant may
choose between the HSA contribution and taxable cash compensation. The
Employer reserves the right to change the amount or timing of contributions at
any time, and from time to time, whether made to the Plan or directly to the
Participant's HSA.
(c) Limitation on Employer Involvement. The terms of individual
HSAs will be governed by an agreement between employees and a trustee or
custodian. The Employer will not impose conditions on the use of HSA funds,
restrict the ability of employees to move HSA funds to other HSA providers
make or influence investment decisions with respect to funds contributed to an
HSA, or receive any payment or compensation in connection with an HSA. The
Employer may limit the forwarding of payroll contributions to designated HSA
trustees or custodians. However, the employer does endorse any particular HSA
provider, and has no authority or control over funds deposited in an HSA.
(d) Contribution Limitations. In no event shall Participant Pretax
Contributions to an HSA, when combined with Employer contributions to the
HSA, exceed,
(i) the statutory maximum amount for
HSA contributions applicable to the
Participant's HDHP coverage option (i.e.,
single or family) for the calendar year in which
the Contribution is made, as adjusted each year
for cost -of- living increases ($2,900 for single
and $5,800 for family in 2008
If you elect to be covered for an HSA eligible plan in a month other than January
you can choose to contribute the statutory maximum of that plan year. The
election will be based on coverage in the last month of the plan year, unless the
participants chooses not to continue on the HSA plan for the 12 subsequent
months following the last month of the year of the first year of eligibility. An
additional catch -up contribution ($800 for 2007, increasing by $100 each year
until it reaches $1,000 in 2009) may be made by Participants who are age 55 or
older.
City of Lino Lakes
City Council
By
Its
•
•
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND:
AGENDA ITEM 1G
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
December 10, 2007
Consider Adoption of Resolution No. 07 -206,
Approving an application for a Temporary On -Sale
Liquor License for the Lino Lakes Lions Club
Simple Majority (3/5 Vote Required)
The Lino Lake Lions Club has scheduled its annual prime rib dinner for Saturday,
March 15, 2008 to be held at St. Joseph's Church, 171 Elm Street. The Lino
Lakes Lions Club is requesting approval of a 1 to 4 Day Temporary On -Sale
Liquor License Application. The license is necessary to allow the Lions Club to
mix and dispense liquor that will be served as part of the dinner.
The applicant is required to submit an application to the city, for approval, at least
30 days prior to the event and city policy requires a background check on the
CEO each time a permit or license application is received. The Lino Lakes
Police Department has completed the background check and has found no
reason to deny the license.
A copy of the application, a certificate of liquor liability insurance and the results
of the background check are on file in the city clerk's office.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 07 -206 approving the Lino Lakes Lions Club
application for a temporary on -sale liquor license.
2. Deny Resolution No. 07 -206.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution No. 07 -206
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
RESOLUTION NO. 07 -206
APPROVING LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB APPLICATION FOR A
1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute, Section 340, allows the city council to issue a
temporary on -sale liquor license to a non - profit organization in connection with a social
event sponsored by the licensee and held within the city limits; and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lions Club has submitted an application to hold a
fundraising event at St. Joseph Catholic Church, 171 Elm Street, on March 15, 2008;
and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lions Club has paid the required fee, and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has conducted an investigation of the Lino Lakes
Lions Club, and
WHEREAS, the Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Division requires the application be
approved by the City of Lino Lakes City Council before submitting for approval to the
Liquor Control Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby
approves the request of the Lino Lakes Lions Club for a temporary on -sale liquor
license.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of December, 2007.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
• AGENDA ITEM 3A
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND:
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
December 10, 2007
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 16 -07
Establishing the 2008 Fee Schedule
Simple Majority (3/5 Vote)
In order to provide for a more efficient and timely method of reviewing and adjusting the
various fees charged by the City, fees are consolidated into one schedule to be
reviewed and adopted on an annual basis. Some of these fees have specific statutory
requirements.
The current fee schedule has been circulated to department directors with a request to
update or amend the schedule as appropriate. For some fees, survey information
available from Metro Cities (Association of Metropolitan Municipalities) was used to
compare our city fees with comparable metro cities.
Ordinance No.16 -07 (the proposed 2008 Fee Schedule) is attached. Recommended
amendments to the ordinance are printed in red. Please note the following:
• Alcohol and Tobacco License Fees — a comparison with other metro
cities indicates that our fees are in line with area averages with the
exception of tobacco licenses. Staff is therefore recommending that the
current fee for a tobacco license be increased from $50 to $100 annually.
• Government Data - the city has an established cost for providing paper
copies of public data, however, new language is recommended on some
related data provision areas. The added section clarifies the city's policy
on how data can be provided (format), the cost of staff time, and provision
of electronically maintained data.
• Housing Maintenance Code — the fee ordinance includes the addition of
a Rental Housing Licensing fee as provided for in the Rental Housing and
Property Maintenance Code adopted by the city in August. The fee is
based on inspection and administrative time associated with the rental
program. It should be noted that the "Star Program" administered by the
Public Safety Department, as a companion to the rental housing
requirements, provides for reductions to the license fees as an incentive
for program compliance;
• Building Fees - base fees are being adjusted and updated.
The 2008 Fee Schedule Ordinance was presented to the Council on November 13,
2007 and first reading was approved. Based on the recommendation of the city
engineer, staff has made additional amendments to the ordinance as follows:
• City Trunk Utility Fees - base fees are being updated.
• Surface Water Management Fees — base fees are being updated.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 16 -07,
the 2008 City Fee Schedule Ordinance
2. Return to staff for further consideration
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 1
•
•
•
1s` Reading: November 13, 2007
2"d Reading:
Publication:
Effective:
City of Lino Lakes
Ordinance No. 16 -07
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2008 CITY OF LINO LAKES FEE SCHEDULE AND PROVIDING
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSES, PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREOF;
REPEALS ALL ORDINANCES, PARTS OF ORDINANCES AND PREVIOUS FEE SCHEDULES
THAT CONFLICT THEREWITH.
The City of Lino Lakes City Council does ordain the following:
Section 1. Findings. Pursuant to Minnesota Law, the Lino Lakes City Charter, and the Lino Lakes City Code,
and upon a review of a study conducted by City Staff, a fee schedule for City services and licensing is hereby
adopted as follows:
2008 FEE SCHEDULE
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
3.2 Beer Investigation
3.2 Beer Off -Sale
3.2 Beer On -Sale
3.2 Beer On -Sale Temporary
Club License
Liquor License Investigation Fee
Liquor On -Sale License
Liquor Off -Sale
Liquor Temporary Permit
Temporary Set -Up License
Wine License Investigation Fee
Wine
Sunday Liquor
AMUSEMENT & COMMERCIAL RECREATION
Cabaret License
Dances
Gambling Permit Application
State Licensed Gambling:
BUSINESS & MISCELLANEOUS
Assessment Search Fee
Burning Permit
Dog Kennel - Private
Dog Kennel - Commercial
Dog License Male /Female
Dog License Male /Female
Copies: City Code Book
Copies: Mailed Minutes
1
$250.00 Indiv.; $450.00 Corporate
$200.00/Year
$300.00/Year
$50.00 + $5.00 /Day
$300.00
$250.00 Indiv.; $450.00 Corporate
$4,500.00/Year
$200.00
$50.00
$25.00
$250.00 Indiv.; $450.00 Corporate
$500.00/Year
$200.00/Year
$35.00
$200.00/Year
$10.00
Regulation Tax
1/10 Of 1% of Net Profits
$20.00 /Search
$30.00
$20.00/Year
$100.00/Year
$10.00
$5.00 (Spayed or Neutered)
$75.00
$36.00 /Year
Copies: Mailed Agenda
Copies: Per Page
Copies: New Resident Labels
Copies: Aerial /Topo Map
City Map
Comp. Plan.
Computer Disk or DVD
Environmental Handbook
Fax Charge
Garbage Hauler License
Overweight Permit
Pawn Shop Class A
Pawn Shop Class B
Class A Secondhand Goods Dealer
Class B Secondhand Goods Dealer
Class C Secondhand Goods Dealer
Pawn Shop Investigation
Pawn Shop In State Investigation
Pawn Shop Out State Investigation
Peddler, Solicitor, Transient Merchant
Recycling Container Purchase
Rental License (annual)
Rental License Reinspection Fee
Special Event Permit
Tapes: Audio
Tapes: Video
Tobacco License
Return Check Charge
Zoning Maps
Zoning Ordinance
$12.00/Year
1St 10 Copies Free, then .25 Per Page
$5.00 Per Month Flat Fee
$10.00
$2.00
$55.00
$7.00
$55.00
1st 10 Pages Free, then .25 Per Page
$75.00 /First Truck $45.00 Each
Additional
$20.00
$10,000.00
$7,000.00
$720.00
$105.00
No Fee
$15,000 (deposit on costs)
$750.00
$20,000.00
$250.00/Year
1St Free / $8.00 for each Additional
$50.00 for 1 or 2 units
$50.00 + $10 per unit for 3 or more unit.
$50 00
$50.00
$10.00
$15.00
mar- $100.00
$30.00
$5.00 /Large or Colored
$25.00
•
•
GOVERNMENT DATA
All public government data is available for viewing at no charge at City Hall during normal business hours,
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The City has an established fee for making copies of requested data.
Copies of non - copyrighted public data are available in the format in which the data is maintained, Data requests
for more than 100 pages may result in charges for staff time in addition to the cost of the actual copies. If the data
requested is maintained electronically and the data takes less than one hour to compile, that data will be released
free of charge.
PARK & RECREATION USER FEES
Field Rental - Resident Only
Baseball /Softball Drag Only
Baseball /Softball Drag & Chalk
Soccer (Excluding Youth)
Picnic Shelter Reservation
Party Wagon - Block Party
2
$20 /Evening
$30 /Evening
$65 /Evening
Residents - No Fee
Non - Resident - $25
No Fee
•
Mon. - Thurs., Non -Block Party
Fri., Sat. Or Sun.,Non -Block Party
Playground Grab Bags
IIIFIRE REGULATIONS
Annual Permit For Sale
Of Consumer Fireworks
POLICE FEES
Copy of Report
Copy of Report - Mail In
Vehicle Lockouts
Clearance Letter
Fingerprinting
Video Image Printing
Photographs
Booking Photographs
Electronic Photographs
False Alarms
• Vehicle Forfeiture Fee
Videotape Copy
Costs include all applicable taxes
BUILDING - CONSTRUCTION UTILITIES
Building Permit Fee Schedule
Fee Table
$25
$40
$10.00 / $25.00
$350 exclusive retail seller /
$100 in conjunction with existing
retail store
Free to subject of data up to 3 pages;
4th page $1.00; then $.25 any addl
pages up to 100.
$4.00 Up To 4 Pages, Then $.25 Per
Page thereafter
No charge
$5.00
$10.00, by appt.
$5.00
$25.00 plus developing cost
$5.00
$5.00 per page of four
3 free; 4 -10 $50.00;
11 or more $100.00 /calendar yr.
$100.00 per vehicle
$25.00
Total Valuation
Fee
$1.00 to $500.00
$23.50
$501.00 to $2,000.00
$23.50 for the first $500.00 plus $3.05 for each additional $100.00,
or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00
$69.25 for the first $2,000.00 plus $14.00 for each additional $1,000.00,
or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00
$391.25 for the first $25,000.00 plus $10.10 for each additional $1,000.00,
or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00
$643.75 for the first $50,000.00 plus $7.00 for each additional $1,000.00,
or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00
$993.75 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.60 for each additional $1,000.00,
or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00
$3,233.75 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.75 for each additional
$1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00
$1,000,001.00 and up
$5,608.75 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $3.15 for each additional
$1,000.00, or fraction thereof
3
Building Permit Fees shall be based on the Fee Table.
Fire Suppression Permit fee shall be based on Fee Table
Minimum fee of $50.00 for all permits
•
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Work commencing before permit issuance Double Permit Fee
2. Erosion Control Inspection Fee (single, two - family, townhomes up to 8 units) $150.00
Multi - family > 8 units, Commercial, Industrial and Institutional determined
by separate agreement.
3. Erosion Control Reinspection Fee $17.00 $50.00 per trip
4. Inspections outside of normal business hours $498 $50.00 per hour*
5. Reinspection fee $47.00 $50.00 per trip
6. Inspections for which no fee is specifically designed
7. Additional plan review required by changes, additions, or revisions
8. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and inspections, or both
9. In Ground Swimming Pool
10. Above Ground Swimming Pool
$47.98 $50.00 per trip
$47.08 $50.00 per hour **
Actual Cost * **
$141.00
$17.00 $50.00
11. Plan Review Fee
a. 65% of the Building Permit Fee
b. 25% of the Building Permit Fee for review of similar plans (Master Plan) in a 12 month period
13. Easement Encroachment Fee $55.00
14. Fence Permit
•
15. Roofing Permit
16. Siding Permit
17. Replacement Windows Permit
18. Retaining Wall Permit
19. All Residential Mechanical Permits, (except new construction
20. Residential New Construction Mechanical Permit
$17.00 $50.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$50.00
and air conditioning $25.00 $50.00
$60.00
21. Residential Air Conditioning Permit .1% of the contract price ($25.00 $50.00 minimum fee)
22. Commercial Mechanical Permit .1% of the contract price ($25.00 $50.00 minimum fee)
23. Manufactured Home Permits $90.00
24. Plumbing Permit $9.00 per fixture ($15.00 minimum fee
25. Sewer Connection Fee $200.00
4
23. Water Connection. Fee $250.00
24. Contractor License Verification $5.00 per permit
• 25. Contractor License .$50.00
26. SAC (Sewer Availability Charge) per Met Council
27. 3/" Water Meter $165.00
28. 1" Water Meter $325.00
29. MXU Unit $125.00
30. Septic Installation or Repair Permit $150.00
31. Septic Pumping Permit $5.00
32. Demolition Permit $17.00 $SO 00
Fee Refund — Per applicant request, City staff may refund permit fees up to 80% for voided permits. Plan
review fees and state surcharge fees are non - refundable.
All permits issued are subject to applicable State surcharge fees.
* Inspections made out side of normal business hours is a three -hour minimum charge
** Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision,
overhead, equipment, hourly wages, and fringe benefits of the employees involved.
* * * Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
•
Sign Permit - Temporary (portable/banner) $25.00 /Term
�;a��dw�cls Board $22sTouch Pad .0.00 00
Curb Stop Covers $68.00
An escrow may be required, as determined by the City Engineer, to cover all costs incurred by the City for plan
revision and construction observation.
ESCROW DEPOSITS
In order to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy, escrow deposits shall be collected if exterior work cannot be
completed due to inclement weather, as determined by City Staff, whereupon a Temporary Certificate of
Occupancy would be issued subject to the execution of an escrow agreement and payment thereof. Any
unfinished work must be completed within six months (weather permitting) from the date of issuance. The
following escrow amounts are hereby established:
a. Driveway - $1,000.00
b. Exterior Concrete - $1,000.00
c. As -built Surveys - $1,000.00
d. Stucco (final coat only) $1,000.00
e. Garage Floor - $1,000.00
5
f. Landscaping - $2,500.00 (landscaping may be escrowed year -round per City Staff)
Escrow deposits include a $50.00 non - refundable administrative fee.
Escrow deposits can be submitted through one of the following procedures:
a.) Escrow can be paid to the City upon execution of an agreement signed by both the a ee and •
p y d the City.
b.) The title company or lending institution can hold the escrow upon execution of an agreement signed
by both the title company or lending institution and the City.
UTILITY FEES
Sewer Rate
Water Meter Rental
Additional Accessories $25.00 Per Month
$52.00 /Quarter/Reu +$1.00 Per 1000 Gallons
Over 10,000 Gallons
$400.00 (Deposit) / $25 Per Month
Water Usage Fees
Gal.)
Valve Replacement
Driveway Covet
Underground Utility Permit
Meter Testing (Our Cost, Delivered To Minneapolis)
5/8" - 3/4" Meter Test
1" Meter Test
1-1/2" - 2" Meter Test
City Trunk Utility Fees
Sanitary Sewer Unit
Water Unit
SURFACE WATER MGMT
$10.00 Per Quarter / Reu
$1.77 Per Thousand Gallons (0 - 30,000 Gal.)
$2.07 Per Thousand Gallons (Over 30,000
$45.00 Each (during work day)
%10‘, 00 Each (e■enings & weekends)
x$60 00
$50.00
$50.00
$65.00
$100.00
$2,585.00 S2 960 00 Per Sac Unit
$3,415.00 S3 S60 00 Per Sac Unit
•
Fee Charge per Sq. Ft. of Development Area
I.
Single /Two
Family Lots
$0- '0124
Land Use Type
II.
Multi Family
Lots
Surface Water Management Charge: Applied to developing parcels in accordance with
established in Resolution No. 92 -70.
Credits may be earned for watershed improvements.
CULVERT PRICES
III.
Commercial /Industrial/
Institutional Property
$&4-74C) 184
the policy provisions
All culvert prices are based on market prices and include tax & delivery and 15% administration fee
6
•
•
•
LAND USE
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
To be charged to land development applications
within I -35E Corridor AUAR area that require
preliminary plats; conditional use permits; site and
building plans; and planned unit developments. Once
paid, the same land will not be charged again.
Application Fee (Required With Each Submittal)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
40 Acres or Less
More Than 40 Acres
Conditional Use Permit
Residential
Commercial /Industrial
ESCROW
FEE DEPOSIT*
$269 per acre
$100.00
$1,500
$5,000
$750
$5,000
Environmental Assessment Worksheet $10,000
Interim Use Permit
Rezoning
40 Acres or Less
More Than 40 Acres
Site Plan Review
$750
$1,500
$5,000
$5,000
Subdivision
Minor Subdivision / Lot Split $1,000
Preliminary Plat
40 Acres or Less $2,500
Over 40 Acres) $10,000
Final Plat $1,500
Planned Unit Development
General Concept Plan $2,500
Development Stage Plan $10,000
Final Plan $2,500
Park Dedication - Residential
Park Dedication — Commercial / Industrial
$2,075 per unit
$2,175 per acre
Tax Increment Financing or Tax Abatement $7,500
Vacation (Street, Utility, Drainage) $500
Variance
$500
Zoning Confirmation Letter $25
*An escrow account shall be established as indicated above to cover all expenses incurred 0 part
the plan review. In the case of applications including multiple requests the highest escrow deposit amount will be
the only one initially required. The applicant is responsible for all costs incurred by the City during plan review.
If the escrow account drops below 10% of the original deposit amount the City will require the submittal of an
additional escrow deposit sufficient to cover any anticipated expenses. Upon the City's determination that the
project is complete or expired, the City will return the remaining escrow deposit to the applicant.
ENGINEERING
Flood Plain
Elevation Certificate
Elevation Certificate Survey
Digital Contour Mapping
LATE FEE
$200.00 Fee
Addl $1,000.00 Escrow Deposit
$800 per % Section Increment
Late penalty fee: a late charge of 10% or $25.00, whichever is greater, will be charged for any fees not paid when
due.
Section 2. Effective Date of Ordinance. This Ordinance shall be effective as of January 2, 2008.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this _th day of 200_.
ATTEST:
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
8
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 3A (i)
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Julie Bartell, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2007
TOPIC: Resolution No. 07 -206
Summary of Ordinance 16 -07 for publication
(2008 Fee Ordinance)
VOTE REQUIRED: 4/5 vote
BACKGROUND:
Ordinance No. 16 -07 establishing 2008 fees will be considered for second reading and
approval by the city council on December 10, 2007. If approved, due to the length of
this ordinance, staff is requesting authorization to publish the ordinance in a summary
form. Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191 allow for summary publication when
appropriate; a copy of the summary is attached to Resolution No. 07 -206.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 07 -206 authorizing summary publication;
2. Deny Resolution No. 07 -206 thus requiring staff to publish Ordinance No. 16 -07
in its entirety;
3. Return to staff.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 1
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 07 -206
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 16 -07
FOR PUBLICATION
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 16 -07, establishing the
2008 Fee Schedule, for first reading on November 23, 2007 and second reading
and final passage on December 10, 2007; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 16 -07 is lengthy and MN statute 412.191 provides for
a city to publish a summary of an ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the summary clearly informs the
public of the intent and effect of the ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the publication in the official newspaper will include a notice that a
full printed copy of the ordinance is available at City Hall,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council approves the
summary in Attachment A for publication according to state law and the City
Charter.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of December 2007.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
• ATTACHMENT A, RESOLUTION 07 -206
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 16 -07
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2008 CITY OF LINO LAKES FEE
SCHEDULE AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSES, PERMITS
AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREOF; REPEALS ALL ORDINANCES,
PARTS OF ORDINANCES AND PREVIOUS FEE SCHEDULES THAT
CONFLICT THEREWITH.
The City of Lino Lakes City Council does ordain the following:
Section 1. Findings. Pursuant to Minnesota Law, the Lino Lakes City
Charter, and the Lino Lakes City Code, and upon a review of a study conducted
by City staff, a fee schedule for City services and licensing is hereby adopted as
follows:
2008 FEE SCHEDULE
A. Alcoholic Beverages;
B. Amusement and Commercial Recreation;
C. Building — Construction Utilities;
D. Utility Fees;
E. Business and Miscellaneous;
F. Culvert Prices;
G. Park and Recreation User Fees;
H. Fire Regulations;
I. Lane Use;
J. Engineering;
H. Police Fees.
Section 2. Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance shall be
effective 30 days after its publication.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council on December 10, 2007.
This is a summary of the adopted ordinance. A full printed copy of the ordinance
is available at City Hall.
•
AGENDA ITEM 4A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: David J. Pecchia,
Public Safety Director / Chief of Police
MEETING DATE: December 10, 2007
TOPIC: Consideration of Resolution No. 07 -183 accepting a
donation from Turtleman Triathlon
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple majority
BACKGROUND
The Lino Lakes Police Department is requesting council to adopt Resolution No. 07-
183 and publicly accept and thank the Turtleman Triathlon for their generous donation
• to the City of Lino Lakes.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt Resolution No. 07 -183 accepting the donation.
2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 07 -183
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 07 -183
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM TURTLEMAN TRIATHLON FOR
EQUIPMENT FOR THE RESERVE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Turtleman Triathlon sponsors a bike race that utilizes the roadways
within the City of Lino Lakes; and
WHEREAS, the Turtleman Triathlon conducts a fun and safe race for the athletes
while being able to give back to the community; and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Reserve Officer Unit provides traffic control during the
event; and
WHEREAS, the Turtleman Triathlon has donated $7,000 to the city in appreciation and
thanks to the dedicated Reserve Officers who volunteer their services to
assist with this event; and
WHEREAS, the monies will be appropriated to the General Fund in the following
manner:
Increase Police Revenue $7,000.00
(101 - 420 -4214 -000 Crime Prevention)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lino Lakes City Council members, do
hereby accept the donation of $7,000 and wishes to express its gratitude to Turtleman
Triathlon for the donation.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of December, 2007.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
•
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
AGENDA ITEM 6A
Michael Grochala
December 10, 2007
Ordinance No. 19 -07, Amending Section 3, Subd. 3.B
of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance Related to
Unsewered Lot Size
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required
BACKGROUND:
Following prior direction from the City Council the City Attorney has drafted an
amendment to Section 3, Subdivision 3.B of the zoning ordinance, to allow the creation
of a parcel not less than one acre in area, where the creation of a new lot is needed to
provide security to a third party lending institution for owner financing (3.B.2.b). Lots
created under this exception, in addition to the existing requirements, would also need
to record a covenant that prohibits transfer of the lots created unless they are
combined. This requirement would not be applicable to any conveyance by a lending
institution who has acquired title as a result of a mortgage foreclosure (3.B.2.h).
The first reading of the ordinance amendment was approved by the Council on
November 26, 2007 with the additional phrase "of the existing habitable single family
home." inserted at the end of Subd. 3.B.2. Following second reading and approval, the
ordinance would be published and would take effect 30 days from the date of
publication.
OPTIONS
1. Approve second reading and passage of Ordinance 19 -07
2. Return to staff for further consideration.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Ordinance No. 19 -07
Council Member moved for adoption of the following ordinance:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 19-07
AMENDING SECTION 3, SUBDIVISION 3.B OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
REGARDING EXCEPTIONS TO THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR UNSEWERED
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1: Findings
The City Council makes the following findings:
1. The City Council may from time to time amend the Zoning Ordinance as allowed by
state statute and city ordinance.
2. The Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan establishes the policy to limit unsewered
development to a 10 acre minimum lot size.
3. The applicability of certain home mortgage financing opportunities are limited by lot
size requirements that conflict with the zoning ordinance requirements
4. Under certain conditions it is in the public interest to allow smaller lot sizes in
unsewered areas to provide property owners the opportunity to utilize equity built up
in their existing homesteads.
Section 2
The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by
the City Council on March 10, 2003 and subsequently amended is hereby amended as
shown below. Underlined text is to be added, strikeout text is to be deleted. Text not
indicated as added or deleted remains unchanged.
Section 3, Subdivision 3.B. UNSEWERED LOTS.
1. Except as provided for in Section 3, Subd. 3A4, and Section 3, Subd.
3.B.2 of this Ordinance, the minimum unsewered lot size within any zoning
district is ten (10) acres.
2. Where the following conditions exist, a lot of a minimum of one acre may be
created, provided that:
—34—
•
•
•
•
•
a. A habitable single family home has been constructed prior to July 13,
1992; or
b. There exists a habitable single family home constructed after July
13, 1992, and the creation of a new lot is needed to provide security
to a third party lending institution for owner financing of the existing
habitable single family home.
The following conditions shall apply to any lot created hereunder:
c. The new lot that has a minimum area of one acre contains an
existing habitable home, and
d. The balance of the property is ten (10) acres or more, and
e. The new lot that has a minimum area of one acre contains one acre
of contiguous buildable land, not including road right of way,
electrical transmission line easements or pipeline easements, and
f. Both the one -acre- minimum lot and lots made from the remaining
land must meet all minimum lot requirements and provide for
meeting setback and other structure requirements, and
g.
It can be demonstrated that all unsewered lots can accommodate
the proposed principal structure, onsite well if the public water
system is not available, and an onsite wastewater treatment system
including both a primary and secondary drain field area in
accordance with Minn. Stat. 7080 and other applicable requirements.
h. For lots created under 2.b herein, the applicant making a request for
a lot split based upon requirements of a lending institution shall
provide written verification from the lender of such requirements at
the time the application is filed.
For Tots created under 2.b herein, the property owner shall record
with the Anoka County recorder a covenant that prohibits the transfer
of any lots created under this section unless the same is combined
into one parcel with the balance of the owner's property from which it
was split or in accordance with the provisions of Section 3,
Subdivision B.1. This requirement shall not apply to any conveyance
by a lending institution who has acquired title as a result of a
mortgage foreclosure.
3. Two family dwellings and multiple family dwellings are not allowable uses
upon unsewered lots.
4. All subdivisions in areas without public sanitary sewer shall be designed
such that the larger non - sewered Tots can be resubdivided to provide
smaller sewered lots when sewer becomes available in the future. Homes
and accessory buildings shall be located on these lots so as to allow for
future resubdivisions.
Section 3
As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and
previously amended.
Section 4
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of December, 2007.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council
Member Carlson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
Council Member moved for adoption of the following ordinance:
•
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6 B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
C. C. MEETING DATE: December 10, 2007
TOPIC: Public Hearing
First Reading: Ordinance No. 18 -07
Vacating Portions of Two Drainage and Utility
Easements, Lot 1, Block 9, Oakwood View
(135 Ash Street)
ACTION: 4/5 vote
BACKGROUND
The site is Lot 9, Block 1 within the Oakwood View plat, the final plat for which was
approved in 2005 with Resolution 05 -26. This lot was platted to accommodate an
enabling residence (group home) associated with the Rice Creek Covenant Church. The
current plan for the enabling residence requires vacating parts of two drainage and utility
easements platted with Oakwood View. One drainage and utility easement needs to be
altered to allow for the building and another for the driveway. Easement vacations
require a public hearing and city council approval by ordinance, which requires a first
and second reading.
ANALYSIS
Discussion of the enabling residence in 2004 included a two story duplex structure with
approximately 3500 square feet in each unit, for a total of 7000 sf. The current submittal
is a one -story structure with a footprint of approximately 6300 sf. The application
includes the vacation of portions of two separate drainage and utility easements. These
easements were established with the final plat of Oakwood View. One area to be vacated
is in the middle of the lot, at the northeast corner of the proposed building. Because the
building itself has a larger footprint than originally envisioned, it would encroach into the
drainage and utility easement. The vacation of this portion of the easement will not affect
the drainage.
The other easement to be vacated is in the location of the driveway leading to the
building. This was a design oversight with the platting in 2004. The remaining easement
will still allow the site to drain properly and will allow access to ponds. Both easements
will still provide a minimum buffer of 10 feet around delineated wetlands.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 18 -07 approving the vacation of portions
of two easements.
2. Return to staff with direction
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1
•
•
•
110 Council Member - moved for adoption of the following ordinance:
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 18 -07
VACATING PORTIONS OF TWO DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
LOT 1, BLOCK 9, OAKWOOD VIEW
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1 Findings
The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application to vacate
portions of existing drainage and utility easements:
1. The Rice Creek Covenant Church and CER of Minnesota have requested that the City
Council vacate portions of two drainage and utility easements that were created with
the final plat of Oakwood View, which was approved with Resolution No. 05 -26.
2. A public hearing was held on December 10, 2007 before the City Council after due
published and posted notice had been given, and all persons interested were given an
opportunity to be heard;
3. The proposed vacations were reviewed with the site plan and grading plans submitted
for the enabling residence on the site. Stormwater management and wetland
buffering will continue to comply with City requirements.
Section 2
Such request is hereby granted and the portions of drainage and utility easements
described as follows are hereby vacated:
Those two parcels located within Lot 9, Block 1, Oakwood View which are more
particularly described as follows:
PARCEL NUMBER ONE
Beginning at the Southwest Corner of said Lot 9; thence North 00 degrees 36 minutes
05 seconds East (Basis of Bearings: the most westerly line of said 9 has an assumed
bearing of North 00 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds East) along the most westerly line
of said Lot 9, a distance of 100.02 feet; thence South 52 degrees 34 minutes 40
seconds East 6.18 feet; thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 43 seconds East 68.20
feet; thence North 14 degrees 56 minutes 20 seconds East 29.71 feet; thence North 38
degrees 48 minutes 17 seconds East 90.90 feet; thence South 23 degrees 04 minutes
50 seconds West 99.69 feet to an angle point in said Lot 9; thence South 00 degrees
36 minutes 05 seconds West, along one of the lines which constitute the boundary of
said Lot 9, a distance of 173.02 feet to the easterly terminus of the most southerly line
of said Lot 9; thence North 88 degrees 38 minutes 13 seconds West, along the most
southerly line of said Lot 9, a distance of 30.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
PARCEL NUMBER TWO
Commencing at the southerly terminus of the most easterly line of said Lot 9; thence
North 00 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds East (Basis of Bearings: The most easterly
line of said Lot 9 has an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds
East) along the most easterly line of said Lot 9, a distance of 35.50 feet; thence North
80 degrees 21 minutes 57 seconds West 114.37 feet; thence North 41 degrees 07
minutes 02 seconds West 44.14 feet to the Point of Beginning of the Parcel Number
Two to be described; thence North 05 degrees 26 minutes 55 seconds West 83.99
feet; thence North 24 degrees 38 minutes 08 seconds West 43.84 feet; thence North
90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 23.22 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00
minutes 00 seconds West 25.95 feet; thence South 01 degrees 46 minutes 51 seconds
East 97.55 feet to the Point of Beginning.
All in Anoka County, Minnesota.
Section 3
Any person, corporation or city owning or controlling easements contained upon the
property vacated reserves the right to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon
such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise
attend thereto.
Section 4
This ordinance shall be in force and effect upon its adoption and publication and in
accordance with the Lino Lakes City Charter.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2007.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
Ordinance No. 18 -07, page 2
—40—
•
•
•
CERT
FCAT
•
; Or;
- \ '7. • 50
01-
)' EX FE S' WITH`,„_„„
0134 FFLED,
WE AIR,
/l0iV: 8g5.58 •' •
:4-, 1 i
ico
90° ( ' \ , - .• .
......- \ --I
•
)899.6
;
\ \
\‘52..; \ \'
%,•\ .59344
ktA
; x
ts9s.
.Lc; 'fige9&'.■_... I
0
OF SURVEY
L.
e ar1.3
et/and
Drainage and \ '11.4f
"
94.8
tility Easement
NA • tv 7
4.8
894.9
0
201.6
zz
\
`-r ss:
- 23'
S8910'5ErE
210630
—1739e-',7
025.5
894 9
• dt
,•;,\ .0%) , ii ''-' c9 \ -
(.0 / 7
4Ir6siv:r. s '`5i. .. .• s
• s
, '
4\ G e-; b ,VsI\ \ „ 0 u ! ; \
- Drainage and \
\ / Utility Easement c_ C95 9 7 \. -,
\ 56o o0 /iR1%PAP V ' o
s ON
51'. * -I's, •
/• s , - . . e _- _ __ fte -4 6 6* - — . -T• t 7 -../ — c:.'s e_Ii i l L
.
I
—94
- i / ti i 1
---.
_ _i_
$ • -7
\
\ 898.8
c.0
0
901.5 1
99F.6
0 P I cc;
..7_ 1120.00 ri °).---
,5(<,.../7 ____
R 0 /-) x...6,--/
,3 /,
. .../
:.., / ..) '4-1 't '''e' cf7.cifm,„ - AF FLED WEIR
in o', \ _,
/ ,...y,
. op it-, 1, c.,6 , 6c, ( pig; iNv: 895.58
3 ......„5,7 901,4 / : ' 41/ C). .,,.: \ . 'a( i? iltig 0 GS
I I 1 tni` 4 ' \ I li,.
et
ݤct3 ' , -.0 / \j''. ii -696- \ eel
.gliAlL._ (
R
„... /
Imprs.--, /
,c:b
',.._ ol \
— ,9_....\894-,-;___)
x
'4i, __,-- ::•(/' N. e'''. /
4. ,_., \ r" /
.3, yif I
i —39B- ----')/ P.aPAO'
\---/ (: x 97.7s, ....\...., 1...._„4.%99.8 ...
\ 897.5 ...7. 4,, ;,'" es .9, •••••- LI .---
L.
854.9
A
I LLI
- I 0
o — 94.2
b
0-; o
co Z >894.7
CD
FES WITH
L
ng Parking
. \
z---\ /
\ .,.C•1 ' '4? 111 _C 0 '. 0
Q.) ...., 4-.• u
i• / \ 1 '',.. ,
----, -o ''', \ ..1ciNi_...._ c.,1 Lig -T., t-s, CM
'''' 0, CNI •sr :
cl) _c 'd.5
.,... i.-,....
outrt (n ,'
. f o
5)0 -1.4- a:
.c.a- ..-4---...
I- In c3
Access ,
Easementi Y
Areas — \\
:RI 8
T-F-WAy PLAT NO.
KA C OU N164"H CH WA Y
z /
250.74 /
900.0
EXCEPTION
S883813"E
iot No. 48
(00. RD. J) (CSAH NC). 32)
599.6
30 in
x N
898.3
r-
)$99 4c3)
o - / 30100
99i7.
280.74
N88°38'13"W
ASH STPEET
ASH STREET
L N88'38'13"W
(OSAH NO. '`.2)
—
et 6°4
- 's7.195.2
Rip
895.5 114733 ifs
— -16-940 895- /
•-• ”
7 "3,
0
I
-0- -e- P)
7.2
346.63 -
S8838'13"E
•A' -17897.8
The North line of th East 340 ft. of---)
t
the West 1120 ft of the South 223 ft.
of SE 1/4 of SW 1/4, Section 31, TWP.
31, RNG. 22
Existing
House
a:
v>>
50
GRAPHIC SCALE
N
Existing
House
(CAH NO. 32)
541.43
(56 FEET)
lthsb08 0-
:xisting
House
S 1/4 Cor. •
•
Sec. 31, TWP. 31, RNG. 22.
(Anoka Co.
_Cast Iron Monument.)
South line of Section 31, TWP. 31, RNG. 22
PARCEL DESCRIPTION
1.58 9, Block 1, Oakwood View, together with im casement for Ingress and Egress purposes ova and
across the east 15055 of the south 65 feet of Lot 8, Block 1, Oakwood View, said Lor 9 being
burdened by an casement for Ingress and BUMS purposes over sod across the most southerly 65 feet
of said Lot 9 which benefits said Lor 8, Block 1, Oakwood View, Anoka County, Minnesota.
SECTION 31, TWP. 31, RKIG 22
VICINITY MAP
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS:
5.00-I
— I--
I-5.00 110.00
1 HoT 80 SCAIF I
BEING 5 FEET IN MTH AND ADJOINING
SIDE LOT LJNES. AND 10 FEET IN 60114
AND ADJOINING STREET AND REAR LINES.
UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THtS PLAT.
58
• DENOTES FOUND IRON PIPE
FOR THE PURPOSES OF NIS SURVEY 1118 50(110 UNE
OF SW 1/4, SEC. 31, T,31, R. 22, IS ASSUMED TO
HAVE A SEARING OF N 8031113" W.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
SEC. 31, T. 31, R. 22
!REM
Porting
wwwww
Am=
moray WatIVAF
87.1,
0587100 SISSISITE I
10 18
8r.. (280.1 00 32)
2110.25
lar3843•1, 9H CTPFT
ASH
Tow Slob, sr. al MO IL
nth sr ars nu a.
sr SS 1/458 del I/O. Sohn M. TR.
M. MG SS
EXCEPTION
—
\/\
Mow
-1
Ne 32)
((I/O
Ss. M. IMP. 31.
IP* Cs
Cos sem “sesonsest.)
1" : 80'
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATIONS
SEE EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT
PREPARED BY GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES
DATED 6-26-2007
I hereby certify that this plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
Richard C. Person Date
MN Reg. No. 23300
DD
GRC FIELD #03505
V • \ I cri c \ 7ClIC_CADI,4-_7(11-17 0:/7C17C1/17 1 .A7.17 DM f-1 1/1/.44,-”-
(1/8:EREBY CERTIFY 111AT 181‘
PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS
PREPARED BY IAE OR UNDER
MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
-MAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
W.A.T. McCULLY
KTE: __--REG 110,23138..)
LL
V/ AT M
DRAWN
CHECKED
WATM
DATE
06/22/2007
VERTICAL SCALE HORIZ.
1' : 30'
JOB NO.
03505
BOOK
PAGE
SHEET
3
OF 8 sHEELsi
SITE PLA\
9
\ Lr REMOVE AND
REINSTALL FE!
/\AND WEIR
r\
\
Fu��e
Sanctutgy
OR FRIENDSHIP PLAC
Wetland I
POND 2P /12P
EMERGENCY
OVERFLOW ELEV: 896.05 \
EX -100YR NW., 896.11
PROP -10DYR HW 896.191
8896.05
EMER.
OVERFLOW
Rain water garden -4
• .Ni
WL:
HWL:
BOT: 8
.75 FFE
898.5
Proposed
Enabling
c, Residence E
o
2
H9 Friendship
Place
11
i JJI
'uture
CIa sroor1^S
EXISTING STORM PIPE AND
STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED
X
Impermeable Areow18,746 SF.
2.5- Storm Runoff-3.905 CY.
RWG 2 Runoff Capacity -783 CYC.VII
RWG 3 Runoff Copocity -1,367 •
4
RWG Runoff Capacity -1.788
Total Runoff Capacfty=3,958 CY.
POND 16 Dead Storoge - 12,303 1F.
(Replacing permitted 5 pond
RCWS f 96 -90)
r
0
0
Gn
CD
LC)
Existing
House
(CSAH Na 32)
L_ / \uLl 1 I\../1 N
Existing
House
X
Wetland
POND 5P /9P
EMERGENCY
OVERFLOW ELEV: 895
100YR HW 895.02
Existing
House
t
/
- i1
GRAPHIC SCALE
or rear )
t Nebo 30 ft-
LEGEND 1
CLPT— PROP. FINISHED
CENTERLINE
— LOW POINT
— HIGH POINT
— FLOW LINE
— STORM MANHOLE
— CATCH BASIN
— PROPOSED ELEV.
e — PROPOSED STOP
SIGN.
— SPOT ELEVATION
— WETLAND
— EASEMENT VACATION
LP
HP
FL
I)
X 895.69
EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE
WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE
THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES, BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE OR SHE
AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND
ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS OR HER FAILURE
TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL
EXISTING U11LI11ES.
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
TWIN CITY AREA (651) 454 -0002
MN TOLL FREE 1- 800 - 252 -1166
WORK WTIi1N THE CSAH 32 (COUNTY) RIGHT -OF -WAY WILL BE
SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF ANOKA COUNTY. INCLUDING ANY
PERMITS AND RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
ADHERE TO ANY REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
AND WORKING HOURS AS ESTABUSHEO BY THE CITY OF UNO LAKES
(HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1HI5
PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER
119 DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
W.A.T. MCCULLY
J
/ DRAWN
WATM
CHECKED
WATM
DATE
06/22/2007
VERTICAL SCALE HORIZ.
: 30'
JOB NO.
03505
BOOK PAGE
SHEET
2
8 SHEEfSJ
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAY'F ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 10, 2007
TOPIC: Resolution No. 07 -194, Approving Payment
Request No. 2 (Final), 2007 Surface Water
Management Project, Outfall Cleaning.
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
At the July 23, 2007 meeting, City Council awarded the 2007 Surface Water
Management, Outfall Cleaning Contract to Jay Brothers, Inc.
The contractor for the Surface Water Management, Outfall Cleaning, Jay Brothers, Inc. is
requesting City approval of Payment No. 2 (Final) in the amount of $822.50. A copy of
the final payment is attached.. The change order authorized by the Council
October 8, 2007, addresses the additional outfall cleaning that was directed by Public
Works.
Staff recommends approval of Payment No. 2 (Final) in the amount of $822.50, which
results in a total project cost of $16,450.00. The total project cost is under the engineer's
estimate of $17,500.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution No. 07 -194, Approving Payment Request
No. 1 (Final), 2007 Surface Water Management Project, Outfall Cleaning.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 07 -194
APPROVING PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 2 (FINAL) 2007 SURFACE WATER
MANAGEMENT PROJECTS, OUTFALL CLEANING
WHEREAS, pursuant to the resolution of the Council adopted July 23, 2007, awarding
the contract for 2007 Surface Water Management Projects, Outfall Cleaning to Jay
Brothers, Inc.;
WHEREAS, a complete breakdown is detailed in attached Payment No. 2 (Final);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
Payment No. 2 (Final) in the amount of $822.50, which results in a total project cost of
$16,450.00 are approved for the 2007 Surface Water Management Projects, Outfall
Cleaning.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 10th day of December, 2007.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
TKDA
• ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292 -4400
(651) 292-0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
Pro}. No. 13849.002 Cert. No. 2(F) St. Paul, MN, October 31 , 20 07
To City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
This Certifies that Jay Bros., Inc.
For 2007 Surface Water Management
Is entitled to
being 2nd
Owner
, Contractor
Eitrht Hundred Twenty -Two Dollars and 50/100
FINAL
estimate for payment on a contract with you dated July 30 , 2007
($ 822.50)
Received payment in full of above Certificate. TIDA
Jay Bros., Inc.
i
, 20 Thomas D. Prew P.E.
RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
—43—
CONTRACT
PLUS EXTRAS
PAYMENTS
CREDITS
Contract price plus extras
$
15,300.00
All previous payments
$
15,627.50
All previous credits
Extra No.
Change Order No. 1
$
1,150.00
Credit No.
$ -
II III
V1 VI
,1 11
II VI
AMOUNT OF THIS CERLLEICATE
$
822.50
Totals
$
16,450.00
$
16,450.00
$ -
Credit Balance
$
-
There wffl remain unpaid on contract after
payment of this Certificate
$
-
1 $
16,450.00 I
$
16,450.00
d $ -
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
—43—
TKDA
Engineers - Architects - Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS
Estimate No. 2(F) Period Ending October 31 , 20 07 Page 1 of 1 Proj. No. 13849.002
Contractor Jav Bros.. Inc. Original Contract Amount $15,300.00
Project 2007 Surface Water Manaeement
Location City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Total Contract Work Completed
Total Approved Credits
Total Approved Extra Work Completed
Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed
Total Amount Earned This Estimate
$
$ 15,300.00
$ 0.00
1,150.00
$ 1,150.00
$ 16,450.00
Less Approved Credits $ 0.00
Less 0 % Retained $ 0.00
Less Previous Payments $ 15,627.50
Total Deductions
Amount Due This Estimate
15,627.50
$ 822.50
Date / / -/� D
Dater 3/- 7
•
•
•
,1MATE NO. 2(F)
607 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
Y OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
..DA PROJECT NO. 13849.002
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION
STORM SEWER PIPE CLEANING
1 MOBILIZATION
2 CLEAN /OPEN STORM SEWER OUTFALL
3 TRAFFIC CONTROL
TOTAL BASE BID
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
1 CLEAN /OPEN STORM SEWER OUTFALL
PERIOD ENDING: October 31, 2007
CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT
UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE
1.0 1.0 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
12.0 12.0 $ 1,150.00 $ 13,800.00
1.0 1.0 $ 500.00 $ 500.00
$ 15,300.00
LS 1.0 1.0 $ 1,150.00 $ 1,150.00
TOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 2(F) $ 16,450.00
•
•
•
•
•
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
DRAFT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
CANVASSING BOARD
: November 13, 2007
. 6:25 p.m.
. 6:30 p.m.
: Council Members Carlson,
O'Donnell and Mayor Bergeson
: Reinert, Stoltz
Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Deputy City Clerk, Jean
Viger; and City Clerk, Julie Bartell
Deputy City Clerk Viger reviewed the results of the Lino Lakes election held on
November 6, 2007.
As requested, a copy of the print -out lists from the ballot scanning equipment and a list of
write -in votes was distributed.
Board Member Carlson noted that the number of voters registered when the polls opened
had decreased from the close of the last election.
Deputy Clerk Viger explained that would normally be due to the removal of registered
voters who have not voted for a certain amount of time.
A question was posed regarding background information on the last election (2006),
specifically regarding the recount of a race.
Canvassing Board Member Carlson moved to accept the November 6, 2007 General
Election Results, as presented. Canvassing Board Member ODonnell seconded the
motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Being no further business, Canvassing Board Member ODonnell moved to adjourn at
6:28 p.m. Canvassing Board Member Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
November 26, 2007.
City Clerk, Julianne Bartell John Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 8D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Gordon Heitke
MEETING DATE: December 10, 2007
TOPIC: Substitute Charter Amendment submitted
by the Lino Lakes Charter Commission
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
After receiving the report and recommendations of the Citizen's Task Force to Review
Charter Provisions Pertaining to Local Improvements in July 2007, the council acted to
refer a proposed charter amendment to Chapter VIII of the City Charter (Public
Improvements and Special Assessments) to the Lino Lakes Charter Commission.
This referral follows the process established by state statute for amendments
proposed by council (Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12, Subd. 5). A charter
commission is allowed 60 days to approve, reject or submit a substitute amendment
with a 90 day extension period if requested. The commission exercised their right for
an extended review period thus making their response due back to the council by
December 6, 2007.
On November 30, 2007, the Lino Lakes Charter Commission submitted the attached
substitute charter amendment to City Hall. The amendment was delivered to the
Council and reviewed briefly at the council work session on December 3, 2007.
The council indicated that they will be further reviewing and discussing the proposed
substitute amendment during the first quarter of 2008.
The council also referred the proposed substitute amendment to the city attorney for
review and process recommendations
COUNCIL ACTION
The City Council is requested to officially accept the substitute charter amendment
submitted to the City on November 30, 2007.
ATTACHMENTS
Substitute Amendment to Chapter VIII recommended by the Charter Commission
The Lino Lakes Charter Commission has completed its review of Ordinance 07 -07, proposing
amendments to Charter Chapter VIII, Public Improvements and Special Assessments. We understand
the concerns being raised by the City Council. Rather than simply approve or reject the Council
proposed amendment, we have prepared a substitute amendment that we believe strikes a better
balance between the concerns of the City Council and the concerns shared by many Lino Lakes
residents. We also recognized the opportunity to clean up confusing language, clarify procedures, and
generally make Chapter VIII of the Charter more readable and useful to everyone.
Attached is the substitute amendment proposed by the Charter Commission. The most
significant provisions are as follows:
1. A referendum is no longer required for a road reconstruction project. When a project would be
paid for out of the general revenue fund, taxpayers may petition for a referendum. This
preserves the rights of the taxpayers to stop projects, while also requiring that enough taxpayers
sign a petition.
2. Special assessment projects may be initiated in three ways. One, if all the property owners
agree to pay all of the cost of the project, as in the existing Charter, the City Council may
approve the project just as described in state law. Two, if more than 25% of the property
owners (but less than 100 %) petition for a project, the City Council may order a feasibility
study by a 3/5 majority. Three, the City Council itself may initiate a project by a 4/5- majority
vote.
3. After the feasibility study is done, notices are sent to the affected property owners with enough
detail to let them know how the public improvements will change the look and use of property
around them, and an estimate of their special assessment.
4. The feasibility study will need to include alternatives, so that the residents and the City Council
can see what it would cost to do some, rather than all, of the project. Those alternatives also
would be included in the information sent to the affected property owners.
5. Property owners would be given a chance to indicate which alternative they prefer. Rather than
building or rejecting an entire project, this will give the City the flexibility to do special
assessment projects approved by the neighborhoods.
The Charter Commission respectfully recommends that the City Council place this amendment
on the ballot in November of 2008.
Respectfully submitted,
Cori M. Duffy
Chair, Lino Lakes Charter Commission
•
•
•
•
SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 8
RECOMMENDED BY THE CHARTER COMMISSION
Section 8.01. Power to Make Improvements.
Subdivision 1. Power. The City may make any type of public improvements not forbidden by
law.
Subd. 2. Local nature of improvements. All public improvements funded in part through either
general revenue or special assessments shall be primarily designed to give a direct benefit to
property currently occupied by residents or businesses in the City. Public improvements
primarily designed to open up new areas of the City for development may not be funded in part
through general revenue or through special assessments (except as provided in Section 8.04,
Subd. 3 below).
Section 8.02. Relation to State Law.
Except as otherwise specified in this Charter, the City shall follow the procedures set forth in
• state law relating to local improvements and special assessments.
Section 8.03. Power to Impose Special Assessments.
Subdivision 1. Need a special benefit. The City may impose special assessments to pay for all or
a part of the cost of the public improvements when the public improvement provides a special
benefit to adjacent or nearby properties, except as provided in Subd. 2 below.
Subd. 2. Street maintenance. The City shall not impose special assessments for maintenance of
its streets. Maintenance includes overlays, sealcoating, and other improvements to care for the
street surface between the date the street was constructed and the date the street will be
reconstructed.
Subd. 3. Sanitary sewer connections. When public improvements include sanitary sewers, the
City shall not require an adjacent or nearby property to connect to those sewers if the property is
served by a properly working private sewage disposal system (e.g., a septic system). The
property may be required to connect to the sanitary sewer system when either the private sewage
disposal system fails, or the property is conveyed to a new owner, whichever occurs first.
Subd. 4. Uniformity and maximum. Special assessments shall be imposed uniformly on similar
properties. The special assessment on each property shall not exceed the benefit to that property.
•
Section 8.04. How to Initiate Public Improvements for Which Special Assessments may be
Imposed.
Subdivision 1. Policy. The City desires to protect existing residents and businesses from having
to pay special assessments for public improvements they do not want. Therefore, the process for
initiating public improvements is restrictive.
Subd. 2. Three ways to initiate public improvements. Special assessments may not be imposed
for public improvements unless the public improvements are initiated in one of the ways
described in subdivisions 3, 4, and 5 below.
Subd. 3. Petition signed by 100 %. The owners of 100% of the property proposed to be specially
assessed for public improvements may present a petition to the City Council. The petition shall
generally describe the public improvements to be studied, and specifically identify the property
proposed to be specially assessed. The petition must be accompanied by an agreement that these
owners agree to pay 100% of the cost of the public improvements. Upon receipt of such a
petition and agreement, the City Council may adopt a resolution to initiate these public
improvements by a simple majority vote. These public improvements need not comply with
Section 8.01, Subd. 2 above. Aside from the requirements of this subdivision, state law shall
govern these public improvements.
Subd. 4. Petition signed by 25% or more. The owners of more than 25 %, but less than 100 %, of
the property proposed to be specially assessed for the public improvements may present a
petition to the City Council. The petition shall generally describe the public improvements to be
studied, and specifically identify the property proposed to be specially assessed. The City
Council may adopt a resolution ordering a feasibility study for these public improvements by a
majority vote of all members of the City Council. In determining whether sufficient signatures
are present on the petition, the following four rules shall be followed:
(1) The signers must own at least 25% of the total number of lots proposed to be specially
assessed. For unplatted property, each existing parcel of land shall be considered one lot.
The owner of a small lot gets one vote, the same as the owner of a large lot.
(2) If more than one person owns a particular lot, only one signature will be counted for
that lot.
(3) If more than one lot is owned by a person, that person's signature will be counted only
once.
(4) If multiple owners of a lot also own an additional lot or lots, only one signature will
be counted for all the owners and all their lots. This is intended to keep any one owner
from dominating the process.
-2-
•
•
•
•
•
Subd. 5. No petition. The City Council may initiate public improvements without a signed
petition. The resolution shall generally describe the public improvement to be studied, and
specifically identify the property proposed to be specially assessed. The City Council may adopt
a resolution ordering a feasibility study for these public improvements by the affirmative vote of
four -fifths all members of the City Council.
Section 8.05. Feasibility Study.
Subdivision 1. Contents. Once public improvements have been initiated under Section 8.04,
Subd. 4 or Subd. 5, the City Council shall direct staff to do a feasibility study. In addition to any
requirements under state law, the feasibility study shall contain the following information: (1) a
list of the recommended public improvements; (2) changes in the appearance or use of property,
such as trees to be removed, easements acquired, and new or changed storm water facilities; (3)
the projected cost for the recommended public improvements; (4) a list of the properties
proposed to be specially assessed for the recommended public improvements; and (5) an
estimated special assessment per lot for the recommended public improvements.
Subd. 2. Alternatives. If more than a single public improvement (e.g., street lights) is proposed,
the feasibility study shall include information on alternatives, such as doing individual
improvements or doing different combinations of the improvements (e.g., just streets, streets and
street lights, streets and curb and gutter, streets and sanitary sewers, etc.). If one of the public
improvements is reconstruction or other work to improve an existing street, one alternative must
be to do only the street. The feasibility study shall contain the information listed in Subd. 1
above for each of the alternative combinations.
Section 8.06. Public Hearing.
Upon being notified that staff has completed its feasibility study, the City Council shall adopt a
resolution scheduling a public hearing on the proposed public improvements. The hearing shall
be scheduled for a date at least two weeks away. In addition to the requirements in state law, the
notice of the public hearing that is sent to the property owner shall be sent by certified mail, and
shall include the information described in Section 8.05.
Section 8.07. Indication of Preferences.
Subdivision 1. Waiting period. After the public hearing, there shall be a period of at least 60
days prior to the next City Council action on the proposed public improvements. Property
owners proposed to be specially assessed are given this 60 -day period so that they may indicate
their preference regarding the proposed public improvements. Each indication of preference
-3-
shall be in writing, signed by the property owner, and state whether the property owner prefers
all, a specific one of the alternative combinations, or none of the recommended public
improvements.
Subd. 2. Preferences counted. Property owners who signed a petition to initiate the public
improvements shall be considered to have indicated a preference for all of the public
improvements described in the petition, unless they indicate a different preference during the 60-
day waiting period. The restrictions on who may sign a petition, described in Section 8.04, Subd.
4 above, also apply to determine who may indicate a preference. If multiple owners of a lot or
lots indicate different preferences, no preferences shall be counted for that lot or lots.
Subd. 3. Utilities in streets. Some utilities typically are installed during street improvements,
which usually costs less than constructing the streets and utilities separately. If property owners
prefer an alternative which results in a street being improved without utilities recommended by
staff, then the utilities may not be installed in that street within five years after completion of the
street, unless the installation of utilities and any related street repair will be paid for without
using any of the City's general revenue.
Section 8.08. City Council Action.
Subdivision 1. Approval of preferred alternative. At the first regular City Council meeting
occurring after the 60 -day period ends, the City Council shall approve the alternative which was
preferred by the largest number of property owners. If the largest number of property owners
indicated a preference that none of the recommended public improvements be constructed, then
the City Council shall not approve any of the proposed public improvements.
Subd. 2. Second waiting period. If the preferred alternative is to have some or all of the public
improvements constructed, then there shall be a period of at least 60 days between the day the
City Council approves the preferred alternative and the date of the next City Council action on
the proposed public improvements. Taxpayers are given this 60 -day period so that they may
petition for a referendum as provided in Section 8.09 below.
Section 8.09. Taxpayer Referendum.
Subdivision 1. Petition. When a proposed public improvement is to be funded in part through
general revenue, the taxpayers of the City may petition for a referendum on the public
improvements. Any registered voter may sign the petition for a referendum. To trigger a
referendum, the number of valid signatures on the petition must equal or exceed 12% of the
number of votes cast for mayor in the last mayoral election.
-4-
•
•
•
•
•
•
Subd. 2. Timing. Prior to the first regular City Council meeting occurring after the end of the
60 -day period described in Section 8.08, Subd. 2, the taxpayers must submit their petition for a
referendum to the City. If the petition is not submitted prior to that meeting, or does not have
sufficient valid signatures, no referendum is required. If the petition is timely submitted, with
sufficient valid signatures, the City Council shall order the public improvements to be placed on
the ballot at the next general or special election.
Subd. 3. Voting. The ballot shall ask voters if they want to use general tax dollars to pay for a
portion of the described public improvements. The actual ballot language shall give a general
description of the public improvements proposed to be constructed.
Subd. 4. Public improvements rejected. If a majority of those voting on the issue are opposed,
the City Council shall not proceed with the proposed public improvements. The City Council
may not initiate the same or substantially similar public improvements within the next 12
months.
Subd. 5. Public improvements approved. When proposed public improvements are allowed
under Subd. 3, the City Council shall adopt a resolution approving the public improvements. If,
after bids are received on the public improvements, the proposed contract exceeds the estimates
described in Section 8.05 above by more than ten (10 %) percent, the City Council may not award
the contract for the proposed improvement. The City Council may rebid the public
improvements once.
Section 8.10. Specified Commercial Area.
Subdivision 1. Not as restricted. The area described in Subd. 2 below is not subject to the
restrictions set forth in Sections 8.04 through 8.09 above. However, certain single family
residences are protected in this area as indicated in Subd. 3 below.
Subd. 2. Area description. This is an area generally known as the intersection of Interstate 35W
and Trunk Highway #49 (Lake Drive). More specifically, this area is described as follows:
- the north one half (1 /2) of the southwest quarter (1/4) of Section 18; and
- that part of the south one half (1/2) of the southwest quarter (1/4) of Section 18 lying
north of the Interstate 35W right -of -way; and
- that part of the southwest quarter (1/4) of Section 17 lying west of the Trunk Highway
#49 (Lake Drive) right -of -way; and
- all of the northwest quarter (1/4) of Section 17, except that part of the southeast quarter
(1/4) of said northwest quarter (1/4) of Section 17 described as follows: beginning at a
-5-
point at the intersection of the south line of said southeast quarter (1/4) of the northwest
quarter (1/4) with the east right -of -way line of Trunk Highway #49; thence northeasterly
along said right -of -way line 938.14 feet (+ or -) ; thence southeasterly 672. 39 feet (+ or -)
to east line of said southeast quarter (1/4) of the northwest quarter (1/4); thence south
along said east line 588.5 feet (+ or -) to the south line of said southeast quarter (1/4) of
the northwest quarter (1/4); thence westerly along said south line 1021.59 feet (+ or -) to
the point of beginning; and
- the north 720 feet of that part of the southwest quarter (1/4) of the northeast quarter
(1/4) of Section 17 lying west of the Anoka County Park property; and
- that part of the north one half (1/2) of the northeast quarter (1/4) of Section 17 lying west
of the Anoka County Park property; and
- the south one half (1/2) of southeast quarter (1/4) of the southeast quarter (1/4) of Section
8; and
- the southeast quarter (1/4) of the southeast quarter (1/4) of the southwest quarter (1/4) of
Section 8; and
- the east 330 feet (+ or -) of the northeast quarter (1/4) of the southeast quarter (1/4) of
the southwest quarter (1/4) of Section 8.
Subd. 3. Single family residences protected. Special assessments shall not be imposed on a
single family residence if the residence meets all three of the following criteria:
(1) The residence is located within the area described in Subd. 2 above; and
(2) At least 80% of the residence is used exclusively as the owner's residence, and not
for a business; and
(3) The residence has been owner- occupied since at least September 30, 1993. If the
residence was empty between owners, this still counts as owner occupied.
Subd. 4. Notice and objection. When public improvements are proposed which would result in
special assessments on a single family residence located in the area described in Subd. 2 above,
the City shall send a certified letter to the owner of the residence prior to the first public hearing
on the proposed public improvements. In addition to the requirements in state law, the letter
shall inform the owner that the owner will not be specially assessed if (a) the owner's residence
meets the three criteria in Subd. 3 above (which shall be listed in the letter), and (b) the owner
gives the City Clerk a written statement, prior to the close of the public hearing, that the owner
objects to being specially assessed.
-6-
•
•
•
•
Subd. 5. Effect of objection. The City shall not assess an owner who submits a signed written
statement objecting to being specially assessed, as described in Subd. 4, unless the City can prove
that the single family residence does not meet the criteria in Subd. 3 above.
Subd. 6. Later connection. If the public improvements include utilities and the owner connects
to one or more of those utilities within five years after the completion of construction of the
improvements, then the owner shall be considered to have consented to being specially assessed
for the public improvements. The City may impose the special assessments at that time, in the
amount that would have been imposed had the owner been specially assessed when the public
improvements were constructed.
-7-