Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04/12/2010 Council Packet
REVISED CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Monday, April 12, 2010 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) City Council: Mayor Reinert, Council Members O'Donnell, Gallup, Roeser, & Rafferty Acting City Administrator: Dan Tesch OARD OF REVIEW, 6 :0© Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Council Chambers Three property owners were present to discuss property values with County Assessing staff. The assessors would follow -up with the property owners and report back to the council. CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 6 :3© P.M. ➢ Call to Order and Roll Call ➢ Pledge of Allegiance ➢ Open Mike / Public Comment Two residents (representing several) addressed the council with concerns regarding a group home located on Century Trail. Mayor Reinert informed the residents that staff were researching the issue of "group homes" and would be discussing the matter at their May 3rd work session. The residents were invited to attend. ➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items CONSENT AGENDA A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) April 12. 2010 (Check No. 87947 through 88027 in the amount of $233,087.50; ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 4222 through 4251) in the amount of $40,059.04 B) Consider Resolution No. 10 -37. Accepting Grant Funds from the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Approved Pg 4 -20 ,FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT. Al Rolek A) Consider Resolution No. 10 -31 Providing for Issuance and Sale of Approximately $1,015,000 General Obligation Improvement & Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2010A Pg 21 -53 Council Agenda Approved -2- REVISED April 12, 2010 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, Dan Tesch A) Consider Lease Agreement with North Memorial Ambulance, Dan Tesch (Postponed 4- 26 -10) to follow PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT ":REPORT, Dave :Peccf"ia No report PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, Rick DeGardner No report COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT, Michael Grochala A) Public Hearing. Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 06 -10, Pg 54 -57 Vacating a Drainage and Utility Easement, 1612 Birch St., Michael Grochala Public Hearing was held — action was postponed to 4 -26 -10 as a 4/5 vote was required B) Consider Resolution No. 10 26, Denying a Variance Request Pg 58 67 to the Zoning Ordinance Requirements for Accessory Structure Area and the Number of Accessory Structures Allowed on a Rural Property, Paul Bengtson (Postponed 3/22/10) C) Town Center Design & Development Guide Pg 68 -78 i. Consider Second Reading of Ordinance No. 05 -10, Amending a Planned Unit Development by Amending the Town Center Design & Development Guide Regarding Outdoor Dining /Seating, Jeff Smyser Reading and roll call required Second Reading was approved ii. Consider Resolution No. 10 -30, approving a summary of Ordinance No. 05 -10 for publication purposes, Jeff Smyser 4 /5'h vote required Approval of the summary was postponed as a 4/5 vote was required. D) Consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 07 -10, Amending City Pg 79 -82 Code Chapter 902: Tree Diseases relating to Emerald Ash Borer, Marty Asleson Approved Council Agenda -3- REVISED April 12, 2010 E) 2010 Street Maintenance Projects, James E. Studenski Pg 83 -92 i. Consider Resolution No. 10 -27, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract, 2010 Overlay Project Approved ii. Consider Resolution No. 10 -28, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract, 2010 Sealcoat Project Approved F) Consider Resolution No. 10 -29, Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Ad for Bids, Pine Street, Zodiac Street and Howard Lake Drive Paving Improvements, James E. Studenski Approved G) Consider Resolution No. 10 -32, Authorizing Preparation of Signal Justification Reports for the Birch St. /Ware Road & Lake Drive/Main Street Intersections, Michael Grochala Approved UNFINISHED BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS Pg 93 -95 A) Consider approval of March 22, 2010 Council Work Session Pg 96 -97 Minutes Council Member Rafferty absent B) Consider approval of March 22, 2010 City Council Meeting Pg 98 -101 Minutes Council Member Rafferty absent Minutes were approved Adjournmen, Community Calendar - A Look Ahead April 13, 2010 through April 26, 2010 Wednesday, April 14 Wednesday, April 14 Monday, April 19 Monday, April 26 Monday, April 26 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Planning & Zoning 7:30 pm, Community Room Jt. Mfg of P &Z and City Council 6:00 pm, Community Room Special Wk Session — Comp Plan 5:30 pm, Community Room Council Work Session 6:30 pm, Council Chambers City Council Meeting • EXPENDITURES APRIL 12th, 2010 • • Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15 :04:12 Ranges: Operator: KKF Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) 8547 (A) Options: Print Ranges /Options: Y Page on Department: N Department Vendor Name - 8569 # of copies: 1 Description AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE DELL MARKETING L.P. ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR CENTRAL PENSION FUND DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF INTL UNION OF OPER E MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM FRANCIS COMPUTER PURCHAS CHOMONIX GOLF COURSE LIQ APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS MARCH 2010 IUOE CONTRIBU APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR MARCH 2010 LOCAL 4904 DU MN CHILD SUPPORT PAY BRIAN C HRONSKI # 001401 MN NCPERS LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 PERA LIFE INS HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department MAYOR /COUNCIL MAIN FLORAL LTD, INC GREEN PLANT /SYMPATHY Total for Department 401 ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIA ACCLAIM BENEFITS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION PRESS PUBLICATIONS, PRESS PUBLICATIONS, PRESS PUBLICATIONS, PRESS PUBLICATIONS, LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF LEXISNEXIS RISK HEALTH PARTNERS Total APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS FEB 2010 COBRA ADMIN FEB 2010 FSA MONTHLY CHA APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES ORD NO. 01 -10 PUBLICATIO ORD NO. 02 -10 PUBLICATIO ORD NO. 03 -10 PUBLICATIO ORD N0. 04 -10 PUBLICATIO APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS SOLO ANNUAL ENROLLMENT FOR 15 APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR for Department 402 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS TDS METROCOM MN MONTHLY PHONE /LONG DISTA DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 406 Amount 429.24 1,462.10 3,524.00 1,346.14 1,306.14 2,457.60 2,413.88 496.00 681.40 336.00 6,027.52 20,480.02* 55.65 55.65* 11.25 11.25 70.24 123.75 110.27 17.39 55.65 39.75 63.60 63.60 57.96 480.00 2,448.52 3,553.23* 3.75 3.75 36.34 22.97 17.39 6.44 343.73 434.37* • Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:04:12 Operator: KKF • Department Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 407 LEGAL CONSULTANTS RATWIK, ROSZAK & MAL Total for D ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MN METRO NORTH TOURI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HEALTH PARTNERS Total for Department 415 PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING & ZONING ENGINEERING • INEERING INEERING 4GINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV COMM DEV POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE so CODE REVISIONS /ENFORCEME epartment 414 APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS HAMPTON INN HOTEL -MOTEL APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRI REVIEW TRAILS DATA /LOMA LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 416 TKDA TKDA TKDA TKDA TKDA TKDA TKDA TKDA TKDA Total for ADVISE ON WATER TESTING/ CITY MEETINGS FEMA GIS /GPS NPDES RCWD REGULATORY REVIEW RESIDENT DRAINAGE ISSUES STATE /ANOKA CO AID SYSTE SUBDIVISION ISSUES Department 417 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRI SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRI LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES ADMIN TIME CITY MXD UPDATE REFLECT APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS Total for Department 418 POST BOARD POST BOARD POST BOARD POST BOARD LIC. NO. LIC. N0. LIC. N0. LIC. N0. 12778 RENEWAL F 14076 RENEWAL F 18559 RENEWAL F 19545 RENEWAL F 13.14 15.01 32.47 56.79 1,781.48 1,898.89* 2,653.67 2,653.67* 3.75 3.75 36.75 19.22 2,245.00 549.96 2,858.43* 7.50 7.50 73.50 260.65 36.26 1,099.92 1,485.33* 165.24 1,084.40 613.31 551.77 881.08 948.85 1,080.63 3,953.65 224.66 9,533.59* 11.25 11.25 55.15 17.39 17.31 104.26 47.52 264.13* 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:04:12 Department Operator: KIT Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE ANOKA COUNTY CENTRAL ANOKA COUNTY CENTRAL RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR TDS METROCOM MN TARGET BANK HAGER, DALE HAGER, DALE BROADWAY AWARDS, INC VERIZON WIRELESS MAGTECH AMMUNITION, DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, IMAGE PRINTING & GRA TRANS UNION LLC XCEL ENERGY OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CA MINNESOTA SHREDDING WEGENER, WAYNE, JR. PERSONNEL DECISIONS STREICHER'S, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. STREICHER'S, INC. UPS /UNITED PARCEL SE MINNESOTA CHAPTER IA CREATIVE PRODUCT SOU LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS ROSS, CLIFF OVERPAYMENT OF JAN HEALT HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 420 BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS STREETS STREETS FEB. 2010 WIRELESS INTER JAN. 2010 WIRELESS INTER APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS MONTHLY PHONE /LONG DISTA SERGEANT PROMOTIONS INTE D HAGER UNIFORM ALLOWANC K -9 SUPPLY REFUND LASER BLACK BRASS PLATES MONTHLY WIRELESS CHARGES 15 CASES .40 S & W 165 F APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR EMERGENCY SERVICE CALL 10 -8 NEWSLETTER 1/2 FOLD INDV EMPLOYMNT CRD REPOR ACCT # 51- 5957363 -0 ENER BOARDING /IMPOUND CONFIDENTIAL DATA SHREDD REIMBURSE FOR SERGEANT C FEB.10 SERGEANT PROMOTIO C SCHIRMERS UNIFORM ALLO M DEMARS UNIFORM ALLOWAN RETURN ITEMS ON INV66749 T PETERSON UNIFORM ALLOW V KLOSNER UNIFORM ALLOWA 3 UPS SHIPPING DOCUMENTS 2009 & 2010 MEMBERSHIP D D.A.R.E ENGLISH ELEM. WO RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 421 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 422 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS 505.81 309.60 116.25 112.50 680.08 21.61 66.89 173.27 42.22 961.71 4,065.00 445.01 261.95 231.49 24.80 3.44 114.84 46.50 13.93 4,700.00 202.82 278.40 - 222.65 278.70 80.15 29.77 50.00 108.97 511.19 549.96 20,978.93 36,103.14* 15.00 15.00 184.02 50.80 2,710.27 2,975.09* 8.62 8.62 91.89 34.78 38.49 1,018.23 1,200.63* 25.69 25.69 • Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:04:12 • Department Operator: }GZF Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET QET ET ET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS • TDS METROCOM MN MONTHLY PHONE /LONG DISTA UNIQUE PAVING MATERI C/M BULK, UPM #2 WINTER DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES MICKELSON, LESTER L XCEL ENERGY XCEL XCEL XCEL XCEL ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY ENERGY XCEL ENERGY XCEL ENERGY XCEL ENERGY WRIGHT /HENNEPIN MICKELSON ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT ACCT # ACCT # CLOTHING ALL ENER ENER ENER ENER ENER ENER ENER 51- 6824668 -8 51- 8047299 -5 51- 8186783 -6 51- 8918701 -1 51- 8918712 -4 51- 8918719 -1 51- 9006555 -1 ACCT # 51- 9077122 -7 ENER CO -0 MONTHLY STREET LIGHT MAI LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS ()WEST SIGNAL PHONE CHARGES HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 430 INTERSTATE ALL BATTE CORDLESS IMPACT BATTERIE POLAR CHEVROLET & MA VEHICLE #243 PIN ASSM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, HYD FILTER, TRANS FILTER O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, EGAN OIL COMPANY EGAN OIL COMPANY EGAN OIL COMPANY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE CCP INDUSTRIES, INC. G & K SERVICES, INC. HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTI WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF HEALTH PARTNERS Total for Department MINI LAMP OIL, TRANS, FUEL TRANS FILTER 1000 GALLONS 1000 GALLONS 1200 GALLONS FILTERS GASOHOL UNL ULSD #2 DYE GASOHOL UNL APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR LED MODULE FOR ARROW STI KLNGRD SELECT CVRL, LG, SHOP TOWELS VEHICLE # 230 AMBER LIGH 2X4 MAGNIFIER LENS /PARTS APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR 431 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APP MONTHLY RUG /MAT REPLACEM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS TDS METROCOM MN MONTHLY PHONE /LONG FILTRATION SYSTEMS, C. P. OFFICE DALCO, INC. DALCO, INC. DALCO, INC. DELTA DENTAL A/P III FILTERS PRODUCT INK CRTGS BATHROOM SUPPLIES CITY HALL CLEANING HOSE PLAN OF APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR 36.34 142.14 215.00 142.54 172.97 4,971.59 86.83 23.25 9.30 21.00 20.85 140.54 27.21 810.00 100.18 49.96 3,006.27 10,027.35* 74.71 35.77 3.00 3.00 28.83 9.88 97.82 14.37 2,530.30 2,602.00 3,075.48 42.26 80.13 145.36 50.18 8.55 6.31 17.45 880.33 9,705.73* 226.62 3.75 3.75 DISTA 118.65 440.84 201.93 200.59 SUPPL 1,570.85 37.28 36.75 Date: 03/25/2010 Time 15:04:12 Department Operator: KKF Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SOLID WASTE SOLID WASTE SOLID WASTE SOLID WASTE SOLID WASTE FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY XCEL ENERGY STANSBERRY, KAY PRESS PUBLICATIONS, MINNESOTA SHREDDING LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF HEALTH PARTNERS Total for ACCT # 51- 6333994 -2 ENER K STANSBERRY CLOTHING AL TWO (2) PAPER SUBSCRIPTI CONFIDENTIAL DATA SHREDD APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Department 432 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MSTMA DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION HOFFMAN, MICHAEL XCEL ENERGY MSTMA /MPSA LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF UNIVERSITY OF MINNES HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM MARCH 201D INS PREMIUMS 2010 MSTMA RENEWAL -S. GI APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES M HOFFMAN CLOTHING ALLOW ACCT # 51- 6008641 -9 ENER STEVE GILBERTSON REGISTR APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS STORMWATER PROGRAM /LAWN APRIL 2010 HEALTH IN5 PR Total for Department 450 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES ASCAP ANNUAL CONTRACT LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH IN5 PR Total for Department 451 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 LIFE IN5 PREM MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 461 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 462 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR 2,965.89 85.73 56.00 16.50 12.00 549.96 6,527.09* 16.89 24.39 45.00 275.91 271.93 80.95 308.30 40.00 93.46 50.00 3,743.62 4,950.45* 12.00 12.00 117.64 17.39 305.00 46.52 1,275.99 1,786.54* 4.12 4.12 12.86 34.78 13.65 530.65 600.18* 1.13 1.13 11.03 5.85 164.98 184.12* 2.25 2.25 12.86 6.82 192.49 • Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:04:12 Operator: KKF • Department Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description ADULT SPORTS ADULT SPORTS Total for Department 463 Total for Fund 101 TARO SPORTSWEAR, INC CO -REC INDOOR SOCCER T'S TARO SPORTSWEAR, INC MENS FIVE PLAYER HOOPS T Total for Department 202 YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL TARO SPORTSWEAR, INC BASEBALL CAMP T'S Total for Department 207 POLICE POLICE FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET OTHER OTHER • OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER OTHER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER • Total for Fund 201 ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE REGISTRATION FOR NEW SQU ELK RIVER FORD, INC. 2010 FORD CROWN VICTORIA Total for Department 420 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE FEDERAL SIGNAL FOR NEW P ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT ZANITAS 24" MILL /FOR MIL PERKINS, INC 2010 GMC SIERRA 1500 6.5 PERKINS, INC 2010 GMC SIERRA 1500 8' Total for Department 431 Total for Fund 402 REED BUSINESS INFORM 2010 SEALCOAT PROJECT REED BUSINESS INFORM MN 2010 OVERLAY PROJECT Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 421 SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRI SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRI SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRI SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRI TKDA TKDA EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT GIS ANALYST STORM SEWER REVIEW LOCATIONS OF STOR SENIOR GIS ANALYST SVCS MILEAGE REIMBURSABLE STORMWATER MGMT ORDINANC Total for Department 499 Total for Fund 422 RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR TDS METROCOM MN CENTENNIAL UTILITIES DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION FRATTALLONE'S HARDWA FRATTALLONE'S HARDWA XCEL ENERGY APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS MONTHLY PHONE /LONG DISTA 1ST QTR 2010 WATER 6 SEW APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES PIPE INSULATION POLY PLUG INSERT ACCT # 51- 6254332 -6 ENER Amount 216.67* 117,494.30* 187.90 176.25 364.15* 633.00 633.00* 997.15* 22.00 22,006.36 22,028.36* 1,310.55 17,359.61 21,696.40 21,976.40 62,342.96* 84,371.32* 184.50 189.42 373.92* 373.92* 31.55 1,198.94 938.30 752.50 22.50 1,787.59 4,731.38* 4,731.38* 8.0B 7.14 109.04 297.23 521.03 59.67 2.98 2.76 629.12 Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:04:13 Department Operator: KKF Page: 7 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount WATER WATER WATER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER TKDA UTILITY EXTENSION COSTS/ LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS HEALTH PARTNERS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 494 Total for Fund 601 SYCOM, INC. RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR RELIASTAR LIFE INSUR INTERSTATE POWER SYS CENTENNIAL UTILITIES DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATION FRATTALLONE'S HARDWA XCEL ENERGY TKDA LINCOLN NATIONAL LIF HEALTH PARTNERS CONTROL PANEL LABOR & IN APRIL 2010 LIFE INS PREM MARCH 2010 INS PREMIUMS GENERATOR /ALTERNATOR INS 1ST QTR 2010 WATER & SEW APRIL 2010 DENTAL INS PR MONTHLY CELLULAR CHARGES TAP CARDED /SURGE SUPPRES ACCT # 51- 6416069 -8 ENER UTILITY EXTENSION COSTS/ APRIL 2010 INS PREMIUMS APRIL 2010 HEALTH INS PR Total for Department 495 Total for Fund 602 ANOKA COUNTY ANOKA COUNTY BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN BLUE TOW SERVICE, IN ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE TKDA TKDA TKDA TKDA Total for COPY FEES FOR ORDER NO. RECORDING ORDER NO. 09 -0 BLUE '03 SUBURU IMPREZA BROWN /GOLD'90 CHEV SILVE TITLE TRANSFER FROM SEIZ CHOMONIX BRIDGE REPLACEM CHOMONIX BRIDGE REPLACEM VFW - PUNCHLIST /FINAL OU VFW PROJECT CLOSEOUT Department Total for Fund 801 Grand Total 1,275.97 33.16 1,290.49 4,236.67* 4,236.67* 12,183.75 8.01 7.08 825.00 175.70 79.00 50.54 17.93 1,353.67 1,275.98 33.13 1,290.51 17,300.30* 17,300.30* 16.00 46.00 176.40 199.48 156.00 1,084.40 1,527.74 338.88 35.56 3,582.46* 3,582.46* 233,087.50* • Date: 03/25/2010 Time 15:05 :35 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal .ges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 8546 8567 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S Sort: A Operator: KKF Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost D01260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 1 123.75 123.75 .00 .00 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 429.24 429.24 .00 .D0 000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 226.62 226.62 .00 .00 000370 ANOKA COUNTY CENTRAL COMMICATIONS 2 615.41 815.41 .00 .00 000440 ANOKA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 3,524.00 3,524.00 .00 .00 004063 ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE BUREAU 2 178.00 178.00 .00 .00 000420 ANOKA COUNTY 2 62.00 62.00 .00 .00 007396 ASCAP 1 305.00 305.00 .00 .00 000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 2 377.88 377.88 .00 .00 000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 1 42.22 42.22 .00 .00 1111946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 201.93 201.93 .00 .00 11964 CCP INDUSTRIES, INC. 1 145.36 145.36 .00 .00 001110 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES 1 472.93 472.93 .00 .00 000537 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 1 2,457.60 2,457.60 .00 .00 007409 CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING, INC. 1 108.97 108.97 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 3 1,808.72 1,808.72 .00 .00 000227 DELL MARKETING L.P. 2 1,462.10 1,462.10 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 4,790.25 4,790.25 .00 .00 001148 EGAN OIL COMPANY 3 8,207.78 6,207.78 .00 .00 900422 ELK RIVER FORD, INC. 1 22,006.36 22,006.36 .00 .00 001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2 1,390.68 1,390.68 .00 .00 000772 FILTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. 1 440.84 440.84 .00 .00 Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:05:36 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: KEE Page: 2 Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Disc. 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 3 23.67 23.67 .00 .00 002328 G & K SERVICES, INC. 1 50.18 50.18 .DD .00 000843 HAGER, DALE 2 240.16 240.16 .00 .00 900559 HEALTH PARTNERS 1 49,883.85 49,883.85 .00 .00 001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 80.95 80.95 .00 .00 003271 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1 8.55 8.55 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 231.49 231.49 .00 .00 000190 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER, INC. 1 74.71 74.71 .00 .00 000476 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS, INC. 3 825.00 825.00 .00 .00 002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 496.00 496.00 .00 .00 008028 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS INC. 1 480.00 480.00 .00 .00 002332 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 1 261.95 261.95 .00 .00 007701 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO 1 1,186.89 1,186.89 .00 .00 001071 MAGTECH AMMUNITION, INC. 1 4,065.00 4,065.00 .00 .00 000177 MAIN FLORAL LTD, INC. 1 55.65 55.65 .00 .00 002590 MICKELSON, LESTER 1 172.97 172.97 .00 0 007390 MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI 1 50.00 50.00 .00 003882 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC 2 63.00 63.00 .00 .00 002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 681.40 681.40 .00 .00 008021 MN METRO NORTH TOURISM 1 2,245.00 2,245.00 .00 .00 003091 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 1 336.00 336.00 .00 .00 007399 MSTMA /MPSA 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 000649 MSTMA 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 663.80 663.80 .00 .00 000900 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 4 150.90 150.90 .00 .00 000983 OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICES 1 70.24 70.24 .00 .00 003443 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER, INC. 1 114.84 114.84 .00 .00 • Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:05:36 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: KEF Page: 3 Discount S 3or # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 008029 PERKINS, INC 2 43,672.80 43,672.80 .00 .00 004144 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INTERNATIONAL - PDI 1 4,700.00 4,700.00 .00 .00 000217 POLAR CHEVROLET & MAZDA 1 35.77 35.77 .D0 .00 000231 POST BOARD 1 360.00 360.00 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 5 278.60 278.60 .00 .00 007776 QWEST 1 49.96 49.96 .00 .00 007696 RATWIK, ROSZAK & MALONEY, PA 1 2,653.67 2,653.67 .0D .00 004070 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 2 373.92 373.92 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 2 3,206.89 3,206.89 .00 .00 008027 ROSS, CLIFF 1 549.96 549.96 .00 .00 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 1 3,303.51 3,303.51 .00 .00 004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 17,359.61 17,359.61 .00 .00 003260 STANSBERRY, KAY 1 85.73 85.73 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 10 617.42 617.42 .00 .00 000375 SYCOM, INC. 1 12,183.75 12,183.75 .00 .00 •913 TAHO SPORTSWEAR, INC. /SATURN SCREENPRINT 2 997.15 997.15 .00 .00 X539 TARGET 1 21.61 21.61 .00 .00 000489 TDS METROCOM MN 1 980.45 980.45 .00 .00 004350 TKDA 2 16,882.21 16,882.21 .00 .00 002487 TRANS UNION LLC 1 24.80 24.80 .00 .00 000909 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS, CORPORATION 1 142.14 142.14 .00 .00 008030 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .D0 004575 UPS /UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 29.77 29.77 .00 .00 000970 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 961.71 961.71 .00 .00 004127 WEGENER, WAYNE, JR. 1 13.93 13.93 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 6.31 6.31 .00 .00 007421 WRIGHT /HENNEPIN CO -OP ELECTRIC ASSOC 1 810.00 810.00 .0D .00 • Date: 03/25/2010 Time 15:05:37 City of Lino Lakes operator: ICKF Page: 4 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Disc 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 10,560.99 10,560.99 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 114 233,087.50 233,087.50 .00 .00* • • Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:05:37 City of Lino Lakes Operator: KKF Page: 5 FM Entry - Invoice Journal • Account # Description Fiscal Debit Credit Main 101- 1151 -000 101 -2040 -000 101 - 2040 -000 101 - 2041 -000 101- 2044 -000 101- 3201 -000 101- 3416 -000 101 -3416 -000 101 - 401- 4900 -000 101- 402 - 4131 -000 101- 402 -4133 -000 101 -402- 4133 -000 101 -402- 4134 -000 101 - 402 - 4300 -000 101- 402 - 4310 -000 101- 402 -4321 -000 101- 402- 4340 -000 101- 402 -4410 -000 101- 406 - 4131 -000 101- 406 - 4133 -000 101 -406- 4133 -000 101 - 406- 4134 -000 101 - 406 - 4321 -000 101 - 407- 4131 -000 101-407-4133-000 101 - 407- 4133 -000 101- 407 - 4134 -000 101- 414 - 4301 -000 101 - 415- 4131 -000 101 -415- 4133 -000 101- 415- 4133 -000 101- 415- 4134 -000 101- 415 -4900 -000 101- 416 - 4131 -000 101- 416 - 4133 -000 101 - 416 - 4133 -000 101 - 416 - 4134 -000 101- 416 -4410 -000 101 - 417- 4410 -000 101 -41B- 4133 -D00 101 -418- 4133 -000 101 -418- 4134 -000 101 -418 -4300 -000 101 -418 -4321 -000 101- 420 - 4131 -000 101 -420- 4131 -000 101 -420 -4133 -000 101- 420- 4133 -000 101- 420 - 4134 -000 101 -420- 4211 -000 101 - 420 - 4213 -000 101 -420- 4214 -000 101 -420- 4300 -000 GENERAL FUND EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PURCHASE 04/2010 1,462.10 GENERAL FUND PAYROLL WITHHOLDING 03/2010 5,276.90 GENERAL FUND PAYROLL WITHHOLDING 04/2010 1,775.14 GENL FUND FLEX PLAN - HEALTH CARE PREMIUM 04/2010 6,027.52 GENERAL FUND FLEX PLAN - DENTAL ACCOUNT 04/2010 2,413.88 GENERAL FUND LIQUOR LICENSE - BAR 04/2010 3,524.00 GENERAL FUND RESALE 03/2010 0.24 GENERAL FUND RESALE 04/2010 0.24 MAYOR /COUNCIL MARKETING 9 EDUCAT 04/2010 55.65 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 2,448.52 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 11.25 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 69.21 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 110.27 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERV 04/2010 480.00 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OTHER CONSULTANT 04/2010 70.24 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 04/2010 17.39 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING 04/2010 222.60 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED SERVIC 04/2010 123.75 GENERAL SENIORS HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 343.73 GENERAL SENIORS LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 3.75 GENERAL SENIORS LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 10.19 GENERAL SENIORS DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 22.97 GENERAL SENIORS TELEPHONE 04/2010 53.73 GENERAL FINANCE HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 1,781.48 GENERAL FINANCE LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 15.01 GENERAL FINANCE LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 69.93 GENERAL FINANCE DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 32.47 GENERAL LEGAL CONSULTANTS MUNICIPAL ATTO 04/2010 2,653.67 ECONOMIC DEV HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 549.96 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 3.75 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 22.97 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 36.75 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MARKETING 04/2010 2,245.00 PLANNING &ZONING HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 1,099.92 PLANNING & ZONING LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 7.50 PLANNING & ZONING LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 43.76 PLANNING & ZONING DENTAL INSURAN 04/2010 73.50 PLANNING & ZONING CONTRACT SERVICES 04/2010 260.65 ENGINEERING CONTRACTED SERVICES 04/2010 9,533.59 COMM DEV LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 11.25 COMM DEV LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 58.77 COMM DEV DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 55.15 COMM DEV PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 04/2010 121.57 COMM DEV TELEPHONE 04/2010 17.39 GENERAL POLICE HEALTH INSURANCE 03/2010 549.96 GENERAL POLICE HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 20,978.93 GENERAL POLICE LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 112.50 GENERAL POLICE LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 627.44 GENERAL POLICE DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 445.01 GENERAL POLICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 04/2010 4,238.27 GENERAL POLICE DARE PROGRAM EXPENSES 04/2010 108.97 GENERAL POLICE CRIME PREVENTION 04/2010 273.71 GENERAL POLICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 04/2010 5,081.61 _16_ Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:05:37 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: KKF Page: E Account # Description Fiscal Debit Credit 101 -420- 4321 -000 GENERAL POLICE TELEPHONE 04/2010 1,641.79 101 - 420 - 4322 -000 GENERAL POLICE POSTAGE 04/2010 29.77 101- 420 - 4370 -000 GENERAL POLICE UNIFORMS 04/2010 698.24 101- 420 - 4381 -000 GENERAL POLICE ELECTRICITY 04/2010 3.44 101- 420 -4410 -000 GENERAL POLICE CONTRACTED SERVICES 04/2010 1,238.70 101 -420 -4452 -000 GENERAL POLICE SUBSCRIPTIONS 04/2010 74.80 101 - 421- 4131 -000 GENERAL FIRE HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 2,710.27 101- 421 - 4133 -000 GENERAL FIRE LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 15.0D 101 - 421 - 4133 -000 GENERAL FIRE LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 65.80 101 -421- 4134 -000 GENERAL FIRE DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 184.02 101- 422- 4131 -000 BUILDING INSPECTIONS HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 1,018.23 101 - 422- 4133 -000 BUILDING INSPECTIONS LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 8.62 101 - 422 - 4133 -000 BUILDING INSPECTIONS LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 47.11 101 - 422 - 4134 -000 BUILDING INSPECT DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 91.89 101 - 422 - 4321 -000 BUILDING INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 04/2010 34.78 101- 430 - 4131 -000 GENERAL STREETS HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 3,006.27 101 - 430 - 4133 -000 GENERAL STREETS LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 25.69 101 -430- 4133 -000 GENERAL STREETS LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 125.87 101 - 430 - 4134 -000 GENERAL STREETS DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 215.00 101 -430- 4224 -000 GENERAL STREETS PATHCHING MATERIALS 04/2010 142.14 101- 430 - 4321 -000 GENERAL STREETS TELEPHONE 04/2010 178.88 101 -430- 4370 -000 GENERAL STREETS UNIFORMS 03/2010 172.97 101- 430 -4385 -000 GENERAL STREETS STREET LIGHTS 04/2010 6,160.53 101 - 431 - 4131 -000 GENERAL FLEET HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 880.33 101 - 431 - 4133 -000 GENERAL FLEET LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 3.00 101 - 431 - 4133 -000 GENERAL FLEET LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 20.45 101 - 431 - 4134 -000 GENERAL FLEET DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 42.26 101 - 431 - 4212 -000 GENERAL FLEET VEHICLE FUEL 04/2010 8,207.78 101- 431 - 4221 -000 GENERAL FLEET SHOP PARTS 04/2010 325.53 101 -431- 4240 -000 GENERAL FLEET SMALL TOOLS 04/2010 226.38 101 - 432 -4131 -000 GOVER BUILD HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 549.96 101 - 432- 4133 -000 GOVER BUILD LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 3.75 101- 432 - 4133 -000 GOVER BUILD LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 15.75 101 - 432 - 4134 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 36.75 101 - 432 - 4200 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS OFFICE SUPPLIES 04/2010 201.93 101- 432 - 4211 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 04/2010 2,249.56 101- 432 -4321 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS TELEPHONE 04/2010 118.65 101 - 432 -4370 -000 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS UNIFORMS 03/2010 85.73 101- 432- 4381 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS ELECTRICITY 04/2010 2,965.89 101- 432- 4410 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS CONTRACTED 04/2010 299.12 101- 450 - 4131 -000 GENERAL PARKS HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 3,743.62 101 -450- 4133 -000 GENERAL PARKS LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 24.39 101 -450- 4133 -000 GENERAL PARKS LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 110.35 101 -450- 4134 -000 GENERAL PARKS DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 275.91 101 - 450- 4321 -000 GENERAL PARRS TELEPHONE 04/2010 271.93 101 -450- 4330 -000 GENERAL PARKS TRAVEL /TUITION 04/2010 50.00 101- 450- 4370 -000 GENERAL PARKS UNIFORMS 04/2010 80.95 101 - 450- 4381 -000 GENERAL PARKS ELECTRICITY 04/2010 308.30 101 - 450- 4452 -000 GENERAL PARKS SUBSCRIPTIONS 04/2010 85.00 101 -451- 4131 -000 GENERAL RECREATION HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 1,275.99 101 - 451- 4133 -000 GENERAL RECREATION LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 12.00 101- 451- 4133 -000 GENERAL RECREATION LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 58.52 101 - 451- 4134 -000 GENERAL RECREATION DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 117.64 101 - 451 -4300 -000 GENERAL RECREATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 04/2010 305.00 -1 7 - • • • Date: 03/25/2010 Time 15:05:37 Account # City of Lino Lakes Operator: IMF Page: 7 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Description Fiscal Debit Credit 101 - 451- 4321 -000 101- 461 - 4131 -000 101 -461- 4133 -000 101 - 461 -4133 -000 101- 461 - 4134 -000 101- 461 - 4321 -000 101- 462 - 4131 -000 101- 462 - 4133 -000 101 - 462 - 4133 -000 101 - 462 -4134 -000 101 - 463 - 4131 -000 101 - 463 - 4133 -000 101 - 463 - 4133 -000 101 - 463 - 4134 -000 201 - 202 -4211 -803 201- 202 - 4211 -843 201- 207 - 4211 -808 GENERAL RECREATION TELEPHONE D4/2010 17.39 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 530.65 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 4.12 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 17.77 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 12.86 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL TELEPHONE 04/2010 34.78 GENERAL SOLID WASTE HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 164.98 GENERAL SOLID WASTE LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 1.13 GENERAL SOLID WASTE LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 6.9B GENERAL SOLID WASTE DENTAL INSURANCE 04 /2010 11.03 GENERAL FORESTRY HEALTH INSURANCE D4/2010 192.49 GENERAL FORESTRY LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 2.25 GENERAL FORESTRY LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 9.07 GENERAL FORESTRY DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 12.86 Fund Total: 117,494.30 RECREATION MAINT SUPPL- BASKETBALL 5 PLAY 04/2010 RECREATION MAINT SUPPLIES ADULT SOCCER 04/2010 RECREATION MAINT SUPP BASEBALL CAMP 04/2010 Fund Total: 176.25 187.90 633.00 997.15 402 - 420 -5000 -000 POLICE CAPITAL OUTLAY 04/2010 22,028.36 402 -431- 5000 -000 FLEET CAPITITAL OUTLAY 04/2010 62,342.96 Fund Total: 84,371.32 1111 421 -499- 4340 -088 421 - 499 - 4340 -089 422 -499- 4300 -000 422 - 499 -4304 -000 STREET MAINTENANCE OTHER PRINTING & PUBL 04/2010 STREET MAINTENANCE OTHER PRINTING & PUBL 04/2010 Fund Total: SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROFNL SERVICES 04/2010 SURFACE WATt.'R MANAGEMENT MUNICIPAL ENGNR 04/2010 Fund Total: 184.50 189.42 373.92 31.55 4,699.83 4,731.38 601 -494- 4131 -000 WATER OPERATING WA'1t,k HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 1,290.49 601 - 494 - 4133 -000 WATER OPERATING WATER LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 7.14 601 -494- 4133 -000 WATER OPERATING WATER LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 41.24 601 - 494 - 4134 -000 WATER OPERATING WATER DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 521.03 601 - 494 - 4211 -000 WATER OPERATING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 04/2010 5.74 601 - 494 -4304 -000 WATER OPERATING MUNICIPAL ENGINEER 04/2010 1,275.97 601 -494- 4321 -000 WATER OPERATING TELEPHONE 04/2010 168.71 601- 494 - 4381 -000 WATt.R OPERATING ELECTRICITY 04/2010 629.12 601 -494- 4382 -000 WATER OPERATING UTILITIES 04/2010 297.23 • .00 .00 00 .00 .00 Date: 03/25/2010 Time: 15:05:38 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Account # Operator: REF Page: 8 Description Fiscal Debit Credit Fund Total: 4,236.67 .00 602- 495- 4131 -000 SEWER OPERATING HEALTH INSURANCE 04/2010 1,290.51 602 - 495- 4133 -000 SEWER OPERATING LIFE INSURANCE 03/2010 7.08 602- 495- 4133 -000 SEWER OPERATING LIFE INSURANCE 04/2010 41.14 602 - 495- 4134 -000 SEWER OPERATING SEWER DENTAL INSURANCE 04/2010 79.00 602- 495- 4211 -000 SEWER OPERATING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 04/2010 17.93 602 - 495- 4300 -000 SEWER OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 04/2010 825.00 602 - 495 - 4304 -000 SEWER OPERATING MUNICIPAL ENGINEER 04/2010 1,275.98 602- 495- 4321 -OOD SEWER OPERATING TELEPHONE D4/2010 50.54 602 -495- 4381 -000 SEWER OPERATING ELECTRICITY 04/2010 1,353.67 602 - 495 - 4382 -000 SEWER OPERATING UTILITIES 04/2010 175.70 602- 495 - 5000 -000 SEWER OPERATING SEWER CAPITAL OUTLAY 04/2010 12,183.75 Fund Total: 17,300.30 801- 2023 -000 801 - 2300 -000 801- 2352 -102 801- 2399 -103 Control A/P CONTRACTOR'S DEPOSITS POLICE DRUG FORFEI 04/2010 533.88 CONTRACTOR'S DEP GENERAL FUND ESCROW 04/2010 2,612.14 CONTRACTOR'S DEP Circle Lex VFW Engineer 04/2010 374.44 CONTR DEP Bruggeman Properties- Administr 04/2010 62.00 Fund Total: 3,582.46 Grand Totals: Control Grand Totals: .00 .00 233,087.50 .00 .00 .00 101 -2020 -000 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 04/2010 111,143.54 101 - 2020 -000 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 03/2010 6,350.76 201 - 2020 -000 RECREATION ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 04/2010 997.15 402 - 2020 -000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REVOLVING ACCTS PAY 04/2010 B4,371.32 421 - 2020 -000 SEAL COATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 04/2010 373.92 422 - 2020 -000 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTS PAYABL 04/2010 4,731.38 601- 2020 -000 WATER OPERATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 04/2010 4,229.53 601- 2020 -000 WATER OPERATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 03/2010 7.14 602 - 2020 -000 SEWER OPERATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 04/2010 17,293.22 602- 2020 -000 SEWER OPERATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 03/2010 7.08 801- 2020 -000 CONTRACTOR'S DEPOSITS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 04/2010 3,582.46 A/P Grand Totals: .00 233,087.50 Discount Discount Grand Totals: Manual Checks - Cash .00 .00 • • • CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT Check Register- FIRE GL Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 3/17/2010 - 3/31/2010 Mar 31, 2D10 02:39PM Report Criteria: Report type: Summary GL Check Check Vendor Period Issue Date Number Number 03/10 03/31/2010 4222 10290 03/10 03/31/2010 4223 10750 03/10 03/31/2010 4224 11565 03/10 03/31/2010 4225 20350 03/10 03/31/2010 4226 20353 03/10 03/31/2010 4227 30480 03/10 03/31/2010 4228 30483 03/10 03/31/2010 4229 30485 03/10 03/31/2010 4230 30490 03/10 03/31/2010 4231 30575 03/10 03/31/2010 4232 31008 03/10 03/31/2010 4233 31137 03/10 03/31/2010 4234 70500 03/10 03/31/2010 4235 110450 03/10 03/31/2010 4236 120450 03/10 03/31/2010 4237 130440 03/10 03/31/2010 4238 130710 03/10 03/31/2010 4239 130850 03/10 03/31/2010 4240 140450 03/10 03/31/201D 4241 140600 03/10 03/31/2010 4242 160050 03/10 03/31/2010 4243 160150 03/10 03/31/2010 4244 160495 03/10 03/31/2010 4245 170180 03/10 03/31/2010 4246 190350 03/10 03/31/2010 4247 200150 03/10 03/31/2010 4248 210232 03/10 03/31/2010 4249 220200 03/10 03/31/2010 4250 220250 03/10 03/31/2010 4251 240100 Grand Totals: Payee ALEX AIR APPARATUS, INC ANOKA CO CENTRAL COMMUN ASPEN MILLS JOE BIBEAU BLAINE BROTHERS CENTENNIAL UTILITIES CENTER FRAME & ALIGNMENT CENTER MART CENTERPOINT ENERGY CITY OF CIRCLE PINES COMCAST CONNEXUS ENERGY GRAFIX SHOPPE, INC KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS AUX. CITY OF LINO LAKES METRO FIRE, INC MN CHAPTER IAAI MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSO NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL C NORTHERN AIR CORPORATIO PAETEC PEARSON EDUCATION PRESS PUBLICATIONS QWEST SENTRY SYSTEMS, INC THOMAS MOTORS, INC UNI- SELECT VERIZON WIRELESS VIKING TROPHIES XCEL ENERGY Description FIREFIGHTER PANT /JACKET 2010 ANNUAL USER FEE 800 M UNIFORM TRAINING LODGING TANKER 21 MTC STATION 1 UTILITIES 93 CHEV R21 MTC FUEL STATION 2 GAS 1ST QTR ACCOUNTING SERVIC INTERNET CENTERVILLE STATI ELECTRIC STATION 1 VEH REFLECTIVE STRIPING AWARDS CEREMONY DINNER FEB REIMBURSEMENTS 10 HELMETS MEMBERSHIP BRUDER MEMBERSHIP DUES 2010 AED BATTERIES STATION 2 ADD CO & NO2 SEN PHONES STATION 2 EMT CLASS WORKBOOKS QUAD SUBSCRIPTION PHONE EXPENSE & REPAIR MONITORING STATION 1 93 CHEV MTC VEH PARTS CELL PHONES ANNUAL AWARDS ELECTRIC STATION 2 Check Amount 1,306.00 665.28 1,375.10 130.24 3,435.05 623.11 80.00 148.49 589.21 1,545.00 188.00 437.39 314.36 578.00 20,168.02 1,752.00 75.00 265.00 632.40 2,871.06 342.46 232.65 28.00 157.56 82.56 537.90 20.02 260.22 739.52 479.44 40,059.04 • M = Manual Check, V = Void Check • AGENDA ITEM 1B STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE April 12, 2010 TOPIC Consideration of Resolution No. 10- 37accepting grant funds from the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. VOTES REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND The Lino Lakes Police Department is requesting that the city council adopt Resolution S No 10 -37 accepting a grant of $10,265.000 from the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. The funds are an extension of a grant previously awarded to the Lino Lakes Police Department in 2008. The funds will be utilized to continue to strengthen our partnership with the community by enhancing the expertise of the Community Emergency Response Team. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution No. 10 -37 accepting the grant. 2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -37 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING $10,265 GRANT FROM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FOR CONTINUED SUPPORT OF THE COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM WHEREAS, The Lino Lakes Police Department has implemented a community partnership in the form of a Community Emergency Response Team; and WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management has awarded the City of Lino Lakes additional grant funds in the amount of $10,265 in support of advancing this partnership effort; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lino Lakes City Council members, do hereby accept the grant of $10,265. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Julie Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April, 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • AGENDA iTEM 2A STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek • MEETING DATE April 12, 2010 • • TOPIC Consideration of Resolution 10 -31 Providing for the Issuance and Safe of Approximately $1,015,000 General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority Minnesota Statutes Section 475.67, subdivision 3 authorizes the issuance and sale of refunding obligations during the six month period prior to the date on which the obligations to be refunded may be called for redemption. Our financial advisor, Springsted, inc. has issued their recommendation for the issuance of $1,015,000 G.O. Improvement and Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2010A. This issue would refinance the outstanding portion of G.O. Improvement and Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A bond. Staff continually monitors the market for opportunities to refinance existing debt issues at lower interest rates, thereby saving the city money on financing costs. By refinancing the outstanding balance of our G.O. Improvement and Utility Revenue Bonds 2004A, it is estimated that the city can achieve net present value savings of approximately $41,120 over the term of the issue, a 4.26% savings. If approved, the bids for this refunding issue would be received on May 10, 2010, with consideration for award of sale by the City Council at its meeting the same day. The Series 2010A issue would have a 10 -year term and would be repaid through previously adopted special assessments and use of utility revenues. Staff recommendation is for the City Council to approve Resolution 10 -31 providing for the issuance of $1,015,000 G.O. Improvement and Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2010A. 1. Adopt Resolution 10 -31. 2. Refer to Staff for further review. 3. Deny Resolution 10 -31. Option 1. Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in the City on Monday, April 12, 2010, commencing at 6:30 P.M. The following members of the Council were present: and the following were absent: * * * The following written resolution was presented by Councilmember , who moved its adoption, the reading of which had been dispensed with by unanimous consent: RESOLUTION NO. 10 -31 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF APPROXIMATELY $1,015,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IIv[PROVEMENT AND UTILITY REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2010A BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that: (a) the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 (the "Act ") and section 475.67, subdivision 3, of the Act to issue and sell its general obligation bonds to refund obligations and the interest thereon before the due date of the obligations, if consistent with covenants made with the holders thereof, when determined by the City Council to be necessary or desirable for the reduction of debt service cost to the City or for the extension or adjustment of maturities in relation to the resources available for their payment; • • • • (b) Section 475.67, subdivision 4 of the Act permits the sale of refunding obligations during the six month period prior to the date on which the obligations to be refunded may be called for redemption; (c) it is necessary and expedient to the sound financial management of the City that the City issue approximately $1,015,000 General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A (the "Bonds ") to refund certain outstanding general obligations of the City. (d) the outstanding bonds to be refunded (the "Refunded Bonds ") consist of the $1,330,000 General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, dated November 15, 2004, of which $965,000 in principal amount is currently outstanding and is callable on July 1, 2010. 2. The City will issue and sell Bonds in the amount of approximately $1,015,000. To provide in part the additional interest required to market the Bonds at this time, additional Bonds will be issued in the amount of $1,007,134. The excess of the purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of $7,866 will be credited to the debt service fund for the Bonds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on the additional Bonds, unless otherwise provided in the resolution awarding sale of the Bonds. The amounts cited above are subject to adjustment in accordance with the Terms of Proposal. The Bonds will be issued, sold and delivered in accordance with the terms of the following Terms of Proposal: 366343v1 SJB LNI40 -106 —23— THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $1,015,000* CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT AND UTILITY REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2010A (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds and the Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") will be received on Monday, May 10, 2010, until 10.30 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time proposals will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 6:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner in which the Proposal is submitted. (a) Sealed Bidding Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3046 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3046 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. OR (b) Electronic Bidding. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received via PARITY ®. For purposes of the electronic bidding process, the time as maintained by PARITY® shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY®. Each bidder shall be solely responsible for making necessary arrangements to access PARITY® for purposes of submitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in compliance with the requirements of the Terms of Proposal. Neither the City, its agents nor PARITY® shall have any duty or obligation to undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure electronic access to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City, its agents nor PARITY® shall be responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any failure in the proper operation of, or have any liability for any delays or interruptions of or any damages caused by the services of PARITY®. The City is using the services of PARITY® solely as a communication mechanism to conduct the electronic bidding for the Bonds, and PARITY® is not an agent of the City. Preliminary; subject to change. 366343v1 SJB LNI40 -106 3 —24— • • • • • If any provisions of this Teilus of Proposal conflict with information provided by PARITY®, this Terms of Proposal shall control. Further information about PARITY ®, including any fee charged, may be obtained from: PARITY ®, 1359 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, New York 10018 Customer Support: (212) 849 -5000 DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated June 1, 2010, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2011. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts* as follows: 2011 $105,000 2014 $ 95,000 2017 $100,000 2019 $110,000 2012 $ 95,000 2015 $100,000 2018 $105,000 2020 $110,000 2013 $ 95,000 2016 $100,000 * The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the principal amount of the Bonds or the maturity amounts offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be made in multiples of S5,000 in any of the maturities. In the event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any discount taken by the successful bidder will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced. Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial bonds and term bonds. All temu bonds shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption and must confoun to the maturity schedule set forth above. In order to designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Years of Term Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form. BOOK ENTRY SYS "1'.EM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC. 366343v1 SJB LN140 -106 4 —25— REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The Bonds will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition, the City will pledge special assessments against benefited properties and net revenues of the City's water utility. The proceeds will be used to refund the February 1, 2011 through February 1, 2020 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, dated November 15, 2004. BIDDING PARAvIE 1 ERS Proposals shall be for not less than $1,007,134 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5 /100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates are not required to be in level or ascending order; however, the rate for any maturity cannot be more than 1% lower than the highest rate of any of the preceding maturities. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. GOOD FAITH DEPOSIT Proposals, regardless of method of submission, shall be accompanied by a Deposit in the amount of $10,150, in the form of a certified or cashier's check, a wire transfer, or Financial Surety Bond and delivered to Springsted Incorporated prior to the time proposals will be opened.. Each bidder shall be solely responsible for the timely delivery of their Deposit whether by check, wire transfer or Financial Surety Bond. Neither the City nor Springsted Incorporated have any liability for delays in the transmission of the Deposit. Any Deposit made by certified or cashier's check should be made payable to the City and delivered to Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. 366343v1 SJB LN140 -106 5 —26— • • • • • Any Deposit sent via wire transfer should be sent to Springsted Incorporated as the City's agent according to the following instructions: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., San Francisco, CA 94104 ABA #121000248 For credit to Springsted Incorporated, Account #635 - 5007954 Contemporaneously with such wire transfer, the bidder shall send an e -mail to bond_services @springsted.com, including the following infoiuiation; (i) indication that a wire transfer has been made, (ii) the amount of the wire transfer, (iii) the issue to which it applies, and (iv) the return wire instructions if such bidder is not awarded the Bonds. Any Deposit made by the successful bidder by check or wire transfer will be delivered to the City following the award of the Bonds. Any Deposit made by check or wire transfer by an unsuccessful bidder will be returned to such bidder following City action relative to an award of the Bonds. If a Financial Surety Bond is used it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota and pre- approved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that underwriter is required to submit its Deposit to the City in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement, will be deposited by the City and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and (iii) reject any proposal that the City deteimines to have failed to comply with the teuiis herein. 366343v1 SJB LN140 -106 6 —27— BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds that shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Unless compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds has been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for payment. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5), the City will undertake, pursuant to the resolution awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or prior to delivery of the Bonds. 366343v1 SJB LN140 -106 7 —28— • • • • • OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 40 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated April 12, 2010 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL 366343v1 SJB LNI40 -106 8 _2g_ /s/ Julie Bartell City Clerk 3. Springsted Incorporated is authorized and directed to negotiate the Bonds in accordance with the foregoing Terms of Proposal. The City Council will meet at 6:30 P.M. on Monday, May 10, 2010, to consider proposals on the Bonds and take any other appropriate action with respect to the Bonds. 4. The law firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, as bond counsel for the City, is authorized to act as bond counsel and to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents, certificates and instruments relating to the Bonds. The officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to assist Kennedy & Graven, Chartered in the preparation of such documents, certificates, and instruments. (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank) 366343v1 SJB LN140 -106 9 -30- • • • • • • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon the following members voted in favor of the motion: and the following voted against: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 366343v) SJB LN)40 -106 10 -31- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on Monday, April 12, 2010, with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes, insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of approximately $1,015,000 General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A of the City. WITNESS My hand as City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 2010. (SEAL) 366343v1 SJB LN)40 -106 11 —32— City Clerk City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • April 1, 2010 Mr. Alan Rolek Finance Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Springsted incorporated 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300 Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2887 Tel: 651 - 223 -3000 Fax: 651- 223 -3002 www.springsted.com Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of $1,015,000 General Obligation Improvement & Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A Dear Mr. Rolek: We have enclosed an electronic copy of our recommendations for the above - captioned issue for distribution to IIICouncil members and City staff prior to your meeting on Monday, April 12, 2010. • We will be forwarding, under separate cover, contract amendments for services relating to arbitrage compliance and continuing disclosure to include this issue. Please sign and retum the enclosed forms so that Springsted will be authorized to complete calculations and reporting as may be required related to this issue. If you should have any questions pertaining to the enclosed documents, or if you require additional copies, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Stauf See€id Stacy Seeland Project Manager akb Enclosures -33- Public Sector Advisors Recommendations For City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota $1,015,000* General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A *Preliminary, subject to change. Presented to: Honorable Jeff Reinert, Mayor Members, City Council Mr. Alan Rolek, Finance Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Study No.: 000502107 SPRINGSTED Incorporated April 1, 2010 • Springsted • • • • RECOMMENDATIONS Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of $1,015,000* General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A (the "Bonds" or the "Issue ") We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the above -named Issue. Proceeds of the Bonds will be used to refund the February 1, 2011 through February 1, 2020 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, dated November 15, 2004 (the "Refunding Bonds "). We recommend the following for the Bonds: 1. Action Requested To establish the date and time of receiving bids and establish the terms and conditions of the offering. 2. Sale Date and Time 3. Method of Sale 4. Authority for the Bonds 5. Repayment Term *Preliminary; subject to change. Monday, May 10, 2010 at 10:30 A.M., with consideration for award by the City Council at 6:30 PM that same evening. The Bonds will be sold through a competitive bidding process. In the interest of obtaining as many bids as possible, we have included a provision in the attached Terms of Proposal for underwriters to submit their bids electronically through the electronic bidding platform of PARITY ®. in addition, physical bids (by phone or fax) will be accepted at the offices of Springsted. A good faith deposit will be required of bidders and may be submitted by (i) certified /cashier's check, (ii) a financial surety bond or (iii) a wire transfer to Springsted as your agent. The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. In addition the street improvement portion of the Bonds is being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the water utility fund improvement portion of the Bonds is being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 444. The Bonds will mature annually February 1, 2011 through 2020. interest will be payable semi - annually each February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 2011. -35- City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota April 1, 2010 6. Security and Source of Payment (a) Security The Bonds will be general obligations of the City, secured by its full faith and credit and taxing power. (b) Source of Payment 7. Prepayment Provisions 8. Credit Rating Comments 9. Term Bonds in addition, the City will be pledge special assessments against benefited property and net revenues of the City's water utility. The street improvement portion of the Bonds will be repaid from special assessments filed against benefited property. The water improvement portion of the Bonds will be repaid from net revenues of the City's water utilities. Due to their short maturity schedule, and to ensure the best pricing possible, the Bonds will not be subject to optional redemption prior to their stated maturity dates. An application will be made to Moody's Investors Service for a rating on the Bonds. The City's general obligation debt is currently rated "Aa3." In May of 2010 Moody's will institute a global rating platform. This will result in the City receiving a recalibration of the rating for its general obligation debt. Based on information released by Moody's, we expect the City's rating to recalibrate to "Aa2." A full rating review will be done with Moody's prior to the sale of the Bonds. We have included a provision that permits the underwriters to combine multiple maturity years into a term bond, subject to mandatory redemption on the same maturity schedule provided in the Terms of Proposal. The advantage to the underwriter is that it provides large blocks of bonds, which are more attractive to bond funds, and certain pension funds, which deal only with large blocks of bonds. This in turn is a benefit to the City since selling larger blocks of bonds reduces the risk to the underwriter, allowing them to lower their costs and the interest coupons. Since the Bonds are being offered on a competitive bid basis and awarded on the lowest true interest cost, the City will award the Bonds to the best bid regardless of whether term bonds are chosen or not. -36- Page 2 • • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota April 1, 2010 10. Federal Treasury Regulations Concerning Tax - Exempt Obligations (a) Bank Qualification (b) Arbitrage Compliance (1) Rebate (ii) Yield Restriction Under Federal Tax Law, financial institutions cannot deduct from income for federal income tax purposes, expense that is allocable to carrying and acquiring tax - exempt bonds. There is an exemption to this for "bank qualified" bonds, which can be so designated if the issuer does not issue more than $30 million of tax- exempt bonds in a calendar year. Issues that are bank qualified generally receive slightly lower interest rates than issues that are not bank qualified. Since the City does not expect to issue more than $30 million of tax - exempt obligations in 2010, the Bonds are designated as bank qualified. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 increased the previous bank qualification limit of $10 million to $30 million for tax - exempt obligations issued in 2009 and 2010. All tax - exempt issues and taxable Build America Bonds are subject to the federal arbitrage and rebate requirements, which require all excess eamings created by the financing to be rebated to the U.S. Treasury. The requirements generally cover two categories: issue proceeds and debt service funds. There are exemptions from rebate in both of these categories. Bond proceeds, defined generally as both the original principal of the issue and the investment earnings on the principal, may qualify for a spending exception to rebate. Since Bond proceeds will be expended within 90 days of delivery, the proceeds will qualify for the 6 -month spending exception. Although the Bonds will qualify for an exception from rebate, the City must still comply with the arbitrage regulations which require yield restriction and are discussed in the section below. The City must maintain a bona fide debt service fund for the Bonds or be subject to yield restriction. Yield restriction requires restricting the investment return in the debt service fund to the yield on the Bonds. A bona fide debt service fund is a fund for which there is an equal matching of revenue to debt service expense, with the fund spent down -37- Page 3 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota April 1, 2010 (c) Economic Life 11. Continuing Disclosure each year to a permitted carry over equal to the greater of the investment earnings in the fund during the prior year or 1/12 the debt service of the prior year. Diligence should be exercised in monitoring the debt service fund for the Bonds due to the potential accumulation of assessment prepayments, which could cause the debt service fund to become non -bona fide. Additionally, all original proceeds of bonds and interest eamings on those proceeds must be expended within three years, or the remaining proceeds will be subject to yield restriction. The City should monitor the project fund of the Bonds to ensure yield restriction provisions of the federal arbitrage rules are met. Springsted currently provides arbitrage compliance services for the City under a separate contract. An amendment to that contract adding the Bonds has been provided to City staff. The average life of the Bonds cannot exceed 120% of the economic life of the projects to be financed. The average fife of the Bonds is less than the remaining average life of the bonds being refunded; therefore, the Bonds are within the economic life requirements. The Bonds are subject to continuing disclosure requirements set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC rules require the underwriter of the Bonds to provide an annual update of certain Official Statement information and report any material events to bond holders. The purchaser therefore requires the City to commit to providing such information under a continuing disclosure agreement or "undertaking." If the City does not enter into such an agreement prior to the offering of the debt, underwriters will not offer a bid to purchase the Bonds. Springsted currently provides continuing disclosure services for the City under a separate contract. An amendment to that contract adding this Issue has been provided to City staff. -38- Page 4 • • • • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota April 1, 2010 12. Attachments • Refunding Schedules . Terms of Proposal DISCUSSION As noted previously, Moody's Investors Service has announced that it will be recalibrating U.S. municipal ratings to its "global scale." The purpose of this action is to "enhance the comparability of ratings" across the credits that Moody's rates. Recalibration will be done by sectors beginning in the middle of April. A schedule for the recalibrations is published which currently calls for ratings of local governments in the state of Iowa to be recalibrated on April 19. We expect that as a result of this recalibration, the City's rating for its general obligation bonds will recalibrate to "Aa1," an increase of one notch. In conjunction with the sale of the Bonds, we will be working with City staff to present relevant information to Moody's for consideration in its review of the City's rating. Proceeds of Bonds will be used to refund the February 1, 2011 through February 1, 2020 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, dated November 15, 2004 (the "Refunded Bonds ") and currently outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $965,000. The issuance of the Bonds is being conducted as a "current" refunding, in which the proceeds of the Bonds are used within ninety days of bond settlement to redeem the outstanding principal of the Refunded Bonds. The refunding transaction is being undertaken to achieve interest cost savings. The Refunded Bonds were orginally issued to finance various street improvements (the "Street improvement Portion ") and sanitary sewer and water utility improvements projects (the "Water Utility Portion ") within the City. On July 1, 2010, the call date, the City will use the proceeds of the Bonds to redeem the remaining $965,000 outstanding principal on the Refunded Bonds. Beginning with the February 1, 2011 principal & interest payment, the City will begin to make debt service payments on the Bonds, realizing the interest cost savings. The City will need to invest the proceeds of the Bonds for the period between the closing date and the July 1, 2010 call date in order to achieve the savings level estimated for this transaction. Based on current interest rate estimates, the refunding is projected to result in the City realizing an average cash flow savings of approximately $4,260 per year. This results in future value savings of approximately $45,410, with a net present value benefit to the City of approximately $41,120. These estimates are net of all costs associated with the refunding. We have attached a set of schedules that summarize the refunding statistics and the projected savings resulting from the sale of the Bonds. These schedules include the following information about the Bonds: • Preliminary Feasibility Summary: shows the detailed sources and uses of funds for the Bonds and statistical information relating to the refunding transaction — page 7. • Prior Original Debt Service: shows the existing debt service requirements on the Refunded Bonds without a refunding — page 8. • Debt Service to Call and to Maturity: shows the Refunded Bonds' remaining debt service to the call date and to maturity — page 9. • Debt Service Schedule: shows the new projected debt service on the Bonds, based on current estimated interest rates — pages 10 -12. • Debt Service Comparison: shows the debt service comparison and the projected annual cash flow savings of the Bonds to the Refunded Bonds — page 13. -39- Page 5 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota April 1, 2010 The Street Improvement Portion of the Bonds will be paid from special assessments filed against benefited properties. Special assessments currently in place for the Street Improvement Portion of the Bonds will be sufficient to pay the February 1, 2011 principal and interest payment on the Street Improvement Portion of the Bonds. Thereafter, beginning with the August 1, 2011 interest payment, each year's collection of assessments will be used to pay the August 1 interest payment due in the collection year and the February 1 principal and interest payment due in the following year. It is not anticipated that the City will be required to levy for the Street Improvement Portion of the Bonds. The Water Utility Portion of the Bonds will be repaid from net revenues of the City's water utility. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 444 and the resolution awarding the Water Utility Portion of the Bonds, the City will covenant to maintain water rates in an amount sufficient to generate revenues to support the operation of the water utility and to pay debt service. The City is required to annually review the budget of the water utility to determine whether current rates and charges are sufficient and to adjust them as necessary. The City has two outstanding bond issues which are also being repaid in whole or in part from net revenues of the City's water utility. The table below shows the net revenues available for debt service of the City's water utility for the fiscal year ending 2008. The projected maximum annual debt service payable from net revenues of the water utility, including the Water Utility Portion of the Bonds, is projected to be approximately $511,126. Operating Revenues $1,058,493 Less: Operating Expenses (959.043) Add Back: Depreciation 411,992 Add: investment Eamings 90.992 Net Revenues Available for Debt Service $602,434 Maximum Annual Debt Service (511;126) Remaining Net Revenues Available $91 308 The success of any refunding transaction is in a large part dependent upon market conditions at the time the Bonds are sold. Springsted will continue to monitor the market prior to the sale date and will keep you apprised of any change in conditions that might affect the success of this refunding. Springsted Incorporated is pleased to again be of service to the City of Lino Lakes. Respectfully submitted, SPRINGSTED Incorporated SAS akb -40- Page 6 • • • • • • $1,015,000 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement & Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A Current Refunding of Series 2004A Preliminary Feasibility Summary Dated 06/01/2010 I Delivered 06/08/2010 Series 2004A Series 2004A Issue IMP Utility Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $475,000.00 S540,OD0.00 $1,015,000.00 Accrued Interest from 06/0112010 to 06/08/2010 176.94 202.51 379.45 Total Sources $475,176.94 $540,202.51 91,015,379.45 Uses Of Funds Deposit to Current Refunding Fund 457,138.02 523,168.75 980,306.77 Costs of Issuance 11,231.53 12,768.47 24,000.00 Total Underwriter's Discount (0.775 %) 3,681.25 4,185.00 7,866.25 Rounding Amount 2,949.20 (122.22) 2,826.98 Deposit to Debt Service Fund 176.94 202.51 379.45 Total Uses $475,176.94 9540,202.51 $1,015,379.45 Flow of Funds Detail Call Date 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 7/1/2010 Primary Purpose Fund Solution Method Gross Funded Gross Funded Gross Funded Total Cost of Investments $457,138.02 $523,168.75 $980,306.77 Total Draws $457,138.02 $523,168.75 $980,306.77 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Net PV Cashflow Savings © 2.396 %(Bond Yield) 16,371.23 21,937.09 38,308.32 Accrued interest Credit to Debt Service Fund 176.94 202.51 379.45 Contingency or Rounding Amount 2,949.20 (122.22) 2,826.98 Net Present Value Benefit $19,497.37 922,017.38 $41,514.75 Net PV Benefit / $965,000 Refunded Principal 4.333% 4.275% 4.302% Net PV Benefit / $1,015,000 Refunding Principal 4.105% 4.077% 4.090% Bond Statistics Average Life 5.226 Years 5.277 Years 5.253 Years Average Coupon 2.4162477% 2.4298414% 2.4235124% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2.5645398% 2.5767092% 2.5710434% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.3961265% 2.3961265% 2.3961265% True Interest Cost (TIC) 2.5501293% 2.5620433% 2.5564947% All inclusive Cost (AIC) 3.05316B8% 3.0607241% 3.0572053% Series 2010 Ref 2004A / Issue Summery / 3/30 /2010 / 11:37 AM -41- Page 7 $1,330,000 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement & Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A Prior Original Debt Service Date Principal Coupon interest Total P +I - 02/01/2005 - 08/01 /2005 - 33,465.78 33,465.78 02/01/2006 65,000.00 2.500% 23,530.63 88,530.63 08/01/2006 - - 22,718.13 22,718.13 02/01/2007 75,000.00 2.50D% 22,718.13 97,718.13 08/01/2007 - - 21,780.63 21,780.63 D2/01/2008 75,000.00 3.000% 21,780.63 96,780.63 08/01/2008 - 20,655.63 20,655.63 02/01/2009 75,000.00 3.000% 20,655.63 95,655.63 08/01/2009 19,530.63 19,530.63 02/01/2010 75,000.00 3.100% 19,530.63 94,530.63 08/01/2010 18,368.13 18,368.13 02/01/2011 85,000.00 3.100% 18,368.13 103,368.13 08/01/2011 - 17,050.63 17,050.63 02/01/2012 85,000.00 3.300% 17,050.63 102,050.63 08/01/2012 15,648.13 15,648.13 02/01/2013 85,000.00 3.500% 15,648.13 100,648.13 08/01/2013 - 14,160.63 14,160.63 02/01/2014 90,000.00 3.600% 14,160.63 104,160.63 08/01/2014 - - 12,540.63 12,540.63 02/01/2015 95,000.00 4.000% 12,540.63 107,540.63 08/01/2015 10,640.63 10,640.63 02/01/2016 95,000.00 4.000% 10,640.63 105,640.63 08/01/2016 - 8,740.63 8,740.63 02/01/2017 100,000.00 4.000% 8,740.63 108,740.63 08/01/2017 - 6,740.63 6,740.63 02/01/2018 105,000.0D 4.000% 6,740.63 111,740.63 08/01/2018 - 4,640.63 4,640.63 02/01/2019 110,000.00 4.125% 4,640.63 114,640.63 08/01/2019 2,371.88 2,371.88 02/01/2020 115,000.00 4.125% 2,371.88 117,371.88 Total $1,330,000.00 $448,171.55 $1,778,171.55 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation Average Life Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date Refunding Delivery Date .tencx2004.1 / SIM ;w/7''ro..sT / .7/2,T/2010 / 70. JOA.M 6/01/2010 5.465 Years 3.9739509% 5.465 Years 6/01/2010 6/01/2010 p _42_ Page 8 • • • • • • $1,330,000 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement & Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A Debt Service To CaII And To Maturity Date Refunded Interest to DM To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded DfS Bonds Call 06/01/2010 - - - - 07/01/2010 965,000.00 15,306.77 980,306.77 - - 08/01 /2010 - 18,368.13 18,368.13 02/01/2011 - - 85,000.00 3.100% 18,368.13 103,368.13 08/01/2011 - - - - 17,050.63 17,050.63 02/01/2012 - 85,000.00 3.300% 17,050.63 102,050.63 08/01/2012 - - - 15,648.13 15,648.13 02/01/2013 - - - 85,000.00 3.500% 15,648.13 100,648.13 08/01/2013 - - - - 14,160.63 14,160.63 02/01/2014 - 90,000.00 3.600% 14,160.63 104,160.63 08/01/2014 - - 12,540.63 12,540.63 02/01/2015 - 95,000.00 4.000% 12,540.63 107,540.63 08/01/2015 - 10,640.63 10,640.63 02/01/2016 - - - 95,000.00 4.000% 10,640.63 105,640.63 08/01/2016 - 8,740.63 8,740.63 02/01/2017 - - 100,000.00 4.000% 8,740.63 108,740.63 08/01/2017 - - - 6,740.63 6,740.63 02/01/2018 - - - 105,000.00 4.000% 6,740.63 111,740.63 08/01/2018 - - - - 4,640.63 4,640.63 02/01/2019 - - - 110,000.00 4.125% 4,640.63 114,640.63 08/01/2019 - - - 2.371.88 2,371.88 02/01/2020 - 115,000.00 4.125% 2,371.88 117,371.88 Total $965,000.00 $15.306.77 $980,306.77 $965,000.00 $221,805.10 S1,186,805.10 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 6/01/2010 Average Life... 5.465 Years Average Coupon 3.9739509% Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 5.465 Years Refunding Bond information Refunding Dated Date 6/01/2010 Refunding Delivery Date 6/01/2010 Scn,.,2004, / SIMILE PURPOSE / 5/2010 / /0:I ? N14 -43- Page 9 $1,015,000 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement & Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A Current Refunding of Series 2004A Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I 02/01/2011 105,000.00 0.550% 13,010.00 118,010.00 02/01/2012 95,000.00 0.800% 18,937.50 113,937.50 02/01 /2013 95,000.00 1.050% 18,177.50 113,177.50 02/01/2014 95,000.00 1.350% 17,180.00 112,180.00 02/01/2015 100,000.00 1.700% 15,897.50 115,897.50 02/01/2016 100,000.00 2.150% 14,197.50 114,197.50 02/01/2017 100,000.00 2.450% 12,047.50 112,047.50 02/01/2018 105,000.00 2.750% 9,597.50 114,597.50 02/01/2019 110,000.00 2.950% 6,710.00 116,710.00 02/D1/2020 110,000.00 3.150% 3,465.00 113,465.00 Total $1,015,000.00 - $129,220.00 $1,144220.00 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $5,351.67 Average Life 5.273 Years Average Coupon 2.4145749% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2.5615618% True Interest Cost (TIC) 2.5540823% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.3942941 % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 3.0529611% IRS Form 8038 Net interest Cost 2.4145749% Weighted Average Maturity 5273 Years .tcnc, 2010 R,I2004A / .%7Nt:.E PURfaW / 3/25/2010 / 1 0..1.'1 iIM t W d -44- Page 10 • • • • • $475,000 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement & Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A Street Improvement Portion Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I 1055°/ Overlevy Special Assessments Surplusl(Shortfall) 02/01/2011 02/01/2012 02/01/2013 02/01/2014 02/01/2015 02/01/2016 02/01/2017 02/01/2018 02/01 /2019 02/01/2020 50,000.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 40,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 45,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 0.550% 0.800% 1.050% 1.350% 1.700% 2.150% 2.450% 2.750% 2.950% 3.150% 6,066.67 8,825.00 8,465.00 7,992.50 7,452.50 6,602.50 5,527.50 4,425.00 3,050.00 1,575.00 56,066.67 53,825.00 53,465.00 47,992.50 57,452.50 56,602.50 50,527.50 54,425.00 53,050.00 51,575.00 58,870.00 56,516.25 56,138.25 50,392.13 60,325.13 59,432.63 53,053.88 57,146.25 55,702.50 54,153.75 66,786.60 66,786.61 66,786.61 66,786.60 66,786.59 66,786.60 66,786.60 66,786.60 66,786.60 66,786.60 7,916.60 10,270.36 10,648.36 16,394.48 6,461.47 7,353.98 13,732.73 9,640.35 11,084.10 12,632.85 Total $475,000.00 - $59,981.67 $534,981.67 $561,730.75 $667,866.01 $106,135.26 Yield Statistics Accrued Interest from 06/01/2010 to 06/08/2010 Bond Year Dollars Average Life Average Coupon Net Interest Cost (NIC) True Interest Cost (TIC) Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes All Inclusive Cost (AIC) IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost Weighted Average Maturity S'rncc 2010 RCf Z CWA / .G:nrs 1004A IMP / 3/.40/2010 / 11,77 AM 176.94 $2,482.43 5.226 Years 2.4162477% 2.5645398% 2.5501293% 2.3961265% 3.0531688% 2.4091200% 5.226 Years —45— Page 11 $540,000 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement & Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A Utility Revenue Portion Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon interest Total P +I 02/01/2011 55,000.00 0.550% 6,943.33 61,943.33 02/01/2012 50,000.00 0.800% 10,112.50 60,112.50 02/01/2013 50,000.00 1.050% 9,712.50 59,712.50 02/01/2014 55,000.00 1.350% 9,187.50 64,187.50 02/01/2015 50,000.00 1.700% 8,445.00 58,445.00 02/01/2016 50,000.00 2.150% 7,595.00 57,595.00 02/01/2017 55,000.00 2.450% 6,520.00 61,520.00 02/0112018 55,000.00 2.750% 5,172.50 60,172.50 02/01/2019 60,000.00 2.950% 3,660.00 63,660.00 02/01/2020 60,000.00 3.150% 1,890.00 61,890.00 Total $540,000.00 $69,238.33 $609,238.33 Yield Statistics Accrued Interest from 06/01/201D to 06/08/2010 202.51 Bond Year Dollars $2,849.50 Average Life 5277 Years Average Coupon 2.4298414% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2.5767092% True Interest Cost (TIC) 2.5620433% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.3961265% All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 3.0607241% IRS Form 8038 Net interest Cost 2.4227345% Weighted Average Maturity 5.277 Years srncs2010 k,I2004A / Scrir.,2004A!,tht, / s/a0/2010 / 11:57 AM d -46- Page 12 • • • • • • $1,015,000 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota General Obligation Improvement & Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A Current Refunding of Series 2004A Debt Service Comparison Date Total P +I Net New D/S Old Net DM Savings 02/01/2011 118,010.00 118,010.00 121,736.26 3,726.26 02/01/2012 113,937.50 113,937.50 119,101.26 5,163.76 02/01 /2013 113,177.50 113,177.50 116,296.26 3,118.76 02/01/2014 112,180.00 112,180.00 118,321.26 6,141.26 02/01/2015 115,897.50 115,897.50 120,081.26 4,183.76 02/01/2016 114,197.50 114,197.50 116,281.26 2,083.76 02/01/2017 112,047.50 112,047.50 117,481.26 5,433.76 02/01/2018 114,597.50 114,597.50 118,481.26 3,883.76 02/01/2019 116,710.00 116,710.00 119,281.26 2,571.26 02/01/2020 113,465.00 113,465.00 119,743.76 6,278.76 Total $1,144,220.00 $1,144,220.00 $1,186,805.10 $42,585.10 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Net FV Cashflow Savings 42,585.10 Gross PV Debt Service Savings 38,293.58 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 2.394 %(Bond Yield) 38,293.58 Contingency or Rounding Amount 2,826.98 Net Future Value Benefit $45,412.08 Net Present Value Benefit $41,120.56 Net PV Benefit / $203,982.76 PV Refunded Interest 20.159% Net PV Benefit / $1,053,293.58 PV Refunded Debt Service 3.904% Net PV Benefit / $965,000 Refunded Principal 4.261% Net PV Benefit / $1,015,000 Refunding Principal 4.051% Refunding Bond information Refunding Dated Date 6/01/2010 Refunding Delivery Date 6/01/2010 .Scrim 2010 Re! 2004A / SIN alt rr 7OtYSL / '/25/2010 / 10.7:) AM -47- Page 13 Preliminary City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Aggregate Water Utility Debt Service DATE 20D6B Utility Revenue Bonds - PS - County Road 19 Watermain 2006F GO Water Revenue Ref Bonds (96B) - PS 2010A GO Imp & Utility Rev Ref 04A - Water Utility Portion TOTAL 02/01/2011 27,132.50 418,721.26 61,943.33 507,797.09 02/01/2012 31,332.50 419,681.26 60,112.50 511,126.26 02/01/2013 30,332.50 - 59,712.50 90,045.0D 02/01/2014 29,332.50 64,187.50 93,520.0D 02/01/2015 28, 307.50 58,445.00 86,752.50 02/01/2016 27,282.50 - 57,595.00 84,877.50 02/0112017 31,245.00 61, 520.00 92,765.00 02/01/2018 - 60,172.50 60,172.50 02/01/2019 - 63,660.00 63,660.00 02/01/2020 - 61,890.00 61,890.00 Total 6204,965.00 6838,402.52 $609,238.33 $1,652,605.85 Operating Revenues $1,056,493 Less: Operating Expenses (959,043) Add Back: Depreciation 411,992 Add: Investment Eamings 90,992 Net Revenues Available for Debt Service $602,434 Maximum Annual Debt Service (511,126) Remaining Net Revenues Available $91,308 4 ,r x.rr / .Y /30 /2010 / Page 14 —48— • • • • • • THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $1,015,000* CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT AND UTILITY REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2010A (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds and the Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") will be received on Monday, May 10, 2010, until 10:30 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time proposals will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 6:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner in which the Proposal is submitted. (a) Sealed Bidding. Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3046 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3046 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. OR (b) Electronic Bidding. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received via PARITY'. For purposes of the electronic bidding process, the time as maintained by PARITY® shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY ®. Each bidder shall be solely responsible for making necessary arrangements to access PARITY® for purposes of submitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in compliance with the requirements of the Terms of Proposal. Neither the City, its agents nor PARITY shall have any duty or obligation to undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure electronic access to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City, its agents nor PARITY® shall be responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any failure in the proper operation of, or have any liability for any delays or interruptions of or any damages caused by the services of PARITY'. The City is using the services of PARITY® solely as a communication mechanism to conduct the electronic bidding for the Bonds, and PARITY® is not an agent of the City. If any provisions of this Terms of Proposal conflict with information provided by PARITY®, this Terms of Proposal shall control. Further information about PARITY ®, including any fee charged, may be obtained from: PARITY ®, 1359 Broadway, 2 "d Floor, New York, New York 10018 Customer Support: (212) 849 -5000 Preliminary; subject to change. -49- Page 15 DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated June 1, 2010, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2011. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts* as follows: 2011 $105,000 2014 $ 95,000 2017 $100,000 2019 $110,000 2012 $ 95,000 2015 $100,000 2018 $105,000 2020 $110,000 2013 $ 95,000 2016 $100,000 The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the principal amount of the Bonds or the maturity amounts offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. in the event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any discount taken by the successful bidder will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced. Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial bonds and term bonds. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above. In order to designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Years of Term Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form. BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The Bonds will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition, the City will pledge special assessments against benefited properties and net revenues of the City's water utility. The proceeds will be used to refund the February 1, 2011 through February 1, 2020 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement and Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, dated November 15, 2004. Page 16 -50- • • • • • • BIDDING PARAMETERS Proposals shall be for not less than $1,007,134 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates are not required to be in level or ascending order; however, the rate for any maturity cannot be more than 1 % lower than the highest rate of any of the preceding maturities. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. GOOD FAITH DEPOSIT Proposals, regardless of method of submission, shall be accompanied by a Deposit in the amount of $10,150, in the form of a certified or cashier's check, a wire transfer, or Financial Surety Bond and delivered to Springsted Incorporated prior to the time proposals will be opened. Each bidder shall be solely responsible for the timely delivery of their Deposit whether by check, wire transfer or Financial Surety Bond. Neither the City nor Springsted Incorporated have any liability for delays in the transmission of the Deposit. Any Deposit made by certified or cashier's check should be made payable to the City and delivered to Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. Any Deposit sent via wire transfer should be sent to Springsted Incorporated as the City's agent according to the following instructions: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., San Francisco, CA 94104 ABA #121000248 For credit to Springsted Incorporated, Account #635- 5007954 Contemporaneously with such wire transfer, the bidder shall send an e-mail to bond_services @springsted.com, including the following information; (1) indication that a wire transfer has been made, (ii) the amount of the wire transfer, (iii) the issue to which it applies, and (iv) the return wire instructions if such bidder is not awarded the Bonds. Any Deposit made by the successful bidder by check or wire transfer will be delivered to the City following the award of the Bonds. Any Deposit made by check or wire transfer by an unsuccessful bidder will be returned to such bidder following City action relative to an award of the Bonds. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota and pre- approved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that underwriter is required to submit its Deposit to the City in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement, will be deposited by the City and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. -51- Page 17 AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and (iii) reject any proposal that the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds that shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Unless compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds has been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for payment. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5), the City will undertake, pursuant to the resolution awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or prior to delivery of the Bonds. Page 18 _52_ • • • • • • OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 40 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated April 12, 2010 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL -53- /s/ Julie Bartell City Clerk Page 19 • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 6A Michael Grochala April 12, 2010 Public Hearing. First Reading: Ordinance 06- 10 Vacating a Drainage and Utility Easement, (1612 Birch Street) ACTION REQUIRED: 4/5 Vote BACKGROUND: In 2008 the City approved a minor subdivision for the property owner of 1612 Birch Street. In accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance a drainage and utility easement was obtained from the property owner as a condition of the approval. ANALYSIS The minor subdivision was never filed with Anoka County and the property owner is no longer pursuing subdivision of the parcel. As such the drainage and utility easement is no longer needed for public purposes. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Ordinance 06 -10 Vacating the Drainage and Utility Easements on Outlot A of the recorded plat of Spirit Hills. ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance No. 06 -10 2. Site Map 1st Reading: Publication: 2 "d Reading: Effective: Council Member ordinance: moved for adoption of the following CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 06 -10 ORDINANCE VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (1612 Birch Street) The City Council of Lino Lakes Ordains: Section 1. Preamble WHEREAS, the City Council of Lino Lakes has determined to vacate the drainage and utility easements, in their entirety, on property legally described as: The West 494.50 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the west 24.75 feet thereof and except road. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 12, 2010 before the City Council in the City Hall Council Chambers after due published and posted notice had been given and a reasonable attempt was made to give personal notice to all affected property owners, and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, it appears to be in the best interest of the City to vacate such drainage and utility easement; and WHEREAS, four -fifths of all members of the City Council concur in this ordinance. Section 2. The drainage and utility easement described as follows is hereby vacated: All that part of the drainage and utility easement lying over, under, and across the north 10.00 feet , the south 10.00 feet, the west 5.00 feet, and the east 5.00 feet of that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter with the east line of the west 24.75 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence northerly and parallel to the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 879.85 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence easterly and parallel with the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 295.31 feet; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 367.89 feet to the southerly line of Parcel 57, ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT - OF -WAY PLAT NO. 11; thence westerly along said southerly fine of Parcel 57 to the east line of said west 24.75 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence southerly along said line 368.77 feet to the point of beginning. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April, 2010. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April, 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • EMISTINO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION nehip 31, Range 22, Anoko County, L gi 8 ; Ctip +t62L�4,1 i L Ioenshlp 31, Range 22. theesl Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section °gD` °ore 0 g "1 S- '.Onomv DELM Fib+' -7� �ti 91 735 30 Y /1.41.5 30 1. /=). 3NL 30 61 735 3D 9/1 MS 3N: AD 9/1 AN 31.11 40 133i ;LW ISM', 3N: 40 3Nf1 1SY3-7 �o- cur& YA 379d 'MEG AD 9 1m06 Kid »9W)40 13191. 7Ndj1SJ9 1.113 Nousrom i s16.DROQW 0Y{AI CD 91 •035 3D 9/990 3D 341 !D ON= 15 31 4 111 0 5 • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CC MEETING DA'L'E: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 6,& . Paul Benztson April 12, 2010 Resolution No. 10 -26, Denying a variance to the number and area of accessory structures allowed on a rural site. 1288 Main Street BACKGROUND Sandy Nordstrom has requested approval of a Variance from the number and area limits for accessory structures in order to build a 42 foot by 88 foot detached accessory structure at 1288 Main Street. The property is located on the south side of Main Street approximately 2,000 feet east of the Interstate 35W overpass, and is currently developed with a dwelling and a horse farm. The applicant has indicated that they have a lease over another parcel consisting of approximately 17 acres. This land is not considered towards the accessory structure number or area calculation as the property isn't under their ownership /control except for the term of the lease. At the March 22, 2010 meeting the City Council voted to table this item for discussion at the April 5, 2010 work session and April 12, 2010 City Council meeting. A work session report was prepared by staff and distributed for the April 5, 2010 work session. This focused on the ordnance language and asks the City Council if the ordinances should be changed to better serve the residents of Lino Lakes. This request was submitted on February 10, 2010. The sixty day review period allowed under state law would expire April 9, 2010. A letter extending the review period another 60 days (June 8, 2010) was mailed to the applicant on April 2, 2010. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Single Family Dwelling Low Density Sewered Residential Rural North Single Family Dwelling Low Density Sewered Residential Rural South Agricultural Land Low Density Sewered Residential Rural East Single Family Dwelling Low Density Sewered Residential Rural West Single Family Dwelling Low Density Sewered Residential Rural Use of property: At the Planning and Zoning Board the applicant informed the city that they are operating a riding stable from this location. Previous discussions with the applicant only included `horse training'. This distinction raises an issue with the use of the property. The zoning ordinance includes a use entitled `Keeping of farm animals' and another for `Commercial Stables, Commercial Kennels, and similar uses'. `Keeping of Farm Animals' is allowed as a permitted use, with a limit of one animal unit (equivalent to 1 horse) per two acres of land. In the case of this site, the property owner has just over 8 acres which equates to 4 animal units (4 horses). However, anytime a horse is boarded, or lessons are given, the use has to be considered `Commercial Stables, Commercial Kennels, and Similar Uses', which is only allowed by Conditional Use Permit. The subject site does not have such a CUP, and can not comply with the conditions required by that CUP: 1. The applicable provisions of Chapter 503 are determined to be satisfied. 2. Property shall be in conformance with minimum lot size requirements of the zoning district. 3. Cages, enclosures and housing facilities shall be a minimum of 50 feet from any neighboring habitable dwelling and 100 feet from any property line, or located in the middle of the parcel, whichever is greater. The subject site is under the 10 acres required by the Rural zoning district, and therefore can not be used as a `Commercial Stable, Commercial Kennel, and Similar Use'. The applicant does lease another 17.5 acres of land from a neighbor, but staff's interpretation is that while the leased land may be counted towards the animal unit calculation, it may not be used to satisfy the requirements of the CUP. Accessory structures: The Zoning Ordinance allows properties that consist of more than 5 acres and less than 10 acres in area to have 4,200 square feet of Accessory Structure area. That amount may be spread between up to 3 separate structures so long as one of those structures is attached to the dwelling. The subject site is currently developed with three accessory structures. The details on those structures and the proposed structure are depicted in the following table: Structure Structure Size Structure Type Structure A 400 square feet Attached Garage Structure B 2240 square feet Detached Structure Structure C 1620 square feet Detached Structure Existing Total 4,260 square feet Structure D (Proposed) 3,696 square feet Fabric Structure on Pony Wall Proposed Total 7,956 square feet Only parcels consisting of 20 or more acres are allowed to exceed 5,000 square feet of accessory structures and /or the limit of three accessory structures. • • • • Setbacks: The Zoning Ordinance requires that accessory structures be five feet from side property lines, thirty feet from rear property lines, forty feet from collector roadways (Main Street), and be placed no closer to the front property line than the main dwelling. The proposed structure would easily exceed all of these requirements. Building Code: The foundation (pony wall) for the proposed structure has been partially constructed. The Building Official has requested additional information from the applicant to prove that the pony wall is constructed in a manner capable of handling the strain of a very large fabric structure. This information will need to be submitted prior to the Building Department issuing a peimit for the structure. Other infoimation and documentation may also be necessary and should be discussed directly with the Building Official. The Building Official has raised two concerns over the use and construction of this building. First, the use as a `Riding Stable' means that public will be entering the facility and because of the size of the structure it may need to have a fire sprinkler system. The second issue is the construction materials used. Since the structure will be exposed to the elements, weather resistant materials must be used. Findings: State law requires the following findings to be made in order to grant the approval of a variance. Staff has completed the findings in regards to the submitted request. FINDINGS In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. While the zoning ordinance requires an accessory structure for all rural properties, the site already is developed in excess of the maximum accessory structure area of 4,200 square feet and exactly the number of accessory structures allowed on the site. b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The restriction of the number and area of accessory structures is directly related to property size. The entire property, whether covered by water, easement, or wetland is used to deteimine the number and area of accessory structures. Therefore there is no physical circumstance unique to this property. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. There is no hardship that staff can identify in this request. The request is based on a desire to overdevelop a site. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. The city has regularly enforced the accessory structure limitations on property owners, and an approval of this request would confer a special privilege normally denied on other lands. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of the accessory structure limitations is to insure that sites are not overdeveloped with outbuildings, and the proposed request would do just that. Planning and Zoning Board On March 10th, the Planning and Zoning Board voted 5 -1 to recommend denial of the request. At the Planning and Zoning Board, the applicant indicated that the largest existing structure is being used as rental storage space and not by the property owner. This is an indication that the allowances of the ordinance are not too restrictive in this case, but rather that the property owner is underutilizing the structures they already have. Recommendation Staff is recommending denial of the Variance with the Resolution 10 -26, based on the findings of fact within. If the Council wishes to approve, alternative findings will need to be made and a new resolution created. Additionally, the following conditions are recommended in case of approval: 1. A building permit must be obtained prior to construction of the proposed structure. 2. The structure may only be maintained as long as the additional acreage to the south is leased by the applicant. 3. An escrow account must be established to cover the cost of removal should the applicant fail to maintain a lease on the additional acreage. Attachments Resolution No. 10 -26, Location Map, Site Plan, Nordstrom Justification Letter • • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -26 DENYING VARIANCES TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AREA AND THE NUMBER OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ON A RURAL PROPERTY. WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a variance at 1288 Main street, and WHEREAS, review and approvals of variances are governed by state statutes and City ordinances, and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. While the zoning ordinance requires an accessory structure for all rural properties, the site already is developed in excess of the maximum accessory structure area of 4,200 square feet and exactly the number of accessory structures allowed on the site. b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The restriction of the number and area of accessory structures is directly related to property size. The entire property, whether covered by water, easement, or wetland is used to determine the number and area of accessory structures. Therefore there is no physical circumstance unique to this property. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. There is no hardship that staff can identify in this request. The request is based on a desire to overdevelop a site. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. The city has regularly enforced the accessory structure limitations on property owners, and an approval of this request would confer a special privilege normally denied on other lands. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of the accessory structure limitations is to insure that sites are not overdeveloped with outbuildings, and the proposed request would do just that. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby denies the variances for accessory structure area and number. Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • 12B3 Main Strast - P ccatic•n Map • Subje=t Site C 1288 Main Street - Site Plan • • • 1288 Main St. Lino Lakes Riding corral with temporary tarp material roof. The tarp material roof can be taken down Seasonally and taken down within a day. We, Sandy Nordstrom and Ken Schienbein train horses for a living. We train family horses, 4H horses and we also train horses for the handicap lads for Freedom Farms. We can not train Horses in the Minnesota winter. We need a roof to cover the corral from tha freezing rain And snow. It is impossible and unsafe for us and the horses to be worked on icy ground. Horses Are unpredictable and don't realize they are on ice and cnn fall and impure themselves and the rider. They need good Sandy ground to be worked in to have good footing. Property Value and Economic times have dropped my property value down, so we can not sell At this time and get the value of the mortgage paid off, As a Real Estate agent that is getting no worm And a merpenter that is layed off, Horses are the only way we have been able to make any income. The Minnesota winter has also stopped us from making any income. There is 3 oil pipelines that runs in the middle of the property and the wetlands that limit the use of the land. Another reason for a temporary roof is to be able to take it with as when the house is Sold in 5 years. 1 can't sell until the market turns around and property vainer go back up. And in 5 years my daughter will graduate from high school. We can certainly agree to stipulations on the variance. If the property sells it is taken Down and the variance will not continue with the new owners. We also have leased 17 acres that is attached to the property for the last 1(iyrs and plan On keeping a lease on that property to let the horses g, aze on. Z think a lot of people enjoy seeing the horses at our home, it keeps a littie of country In Lino Lakes. We would like to keep it a working hobby farm all year round. Thank You Ken and Sandy -66- Clear Span'M 42 Wide Pony Wall Building Q2009 ClearSpan'm right Reserved.. Reprociucton t phibt without permission. Photr) may show a modal of a currarenf tength. -67- STK# DIMENSIDNS P3C:13'1547*.4 4Z W x 3'` H x 72 L • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM 6 C i and ii STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: April 12, 2010 TOPIC: i. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 05 -10 Planned Unit Development Amendment: Amending Town Center Design & Development Guide Regarding Outdoor Dining /Seating ii. Resolution No. 10 -30, Summary of Ord. No. 05 -10 for Publication VOTE: Ordinance No. 05 -10 3/5 Resolution No. 10 -30 4/5 BACKGROUND The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 05 -10 on March 22. This is the second reading. Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide (Development Guide) creates land use categories and their locations. It also creates regulations for those land uses. In effect, the Development Guide is a set of special zoning standards that apply only in mixed use area of the town center. The ordinance amends the outdoor dining /seating requirements in the Development Guide. Minnesota Statutes allows the City Council to approve by a 4/5 vote that a summary be published. Resolution No. 10 -30 is the summary of the ordinance for publication. OPTIONS 1. Approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 05 -10, amending the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide. (Staff also recommends the Council dispense with the reading in full of the ordinance, by unanimous vote, as provided in the City Charter.) 2. Approve Resolution No. 10 -30. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Options 1 and 2 1st Reading: March 22, 2010 Publication: 2 "d Reading: April 12, 2010 Effective: Council Member moved for adoption of the following ordinance: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 05 -10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN CENTER DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTDOOR SEATING Section 1 Findings 1. The mixed use area of the Lino Lakes Town Center, currently called Legacy at Woods Edge, was rezoned to Planned Unit Development by Ordinance No. 04 -04. That ordinance also stated that development of the property shall be subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide as well as the provisions of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable chapters of City Code. 2. The Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide currently requires a conditional use permit for outdoor dining /seating for eating places /restaurants /private clubs and lodges. The Design & Development Guide does not address outdoor seating for other uses. 4. Whereas site plan reviews for new commercial buildings are reviewed administratively, a conditional use permit requires a public hearing and approval by the city council. This adds time and expense for a business without providing a benefit to the public that can't be provided through an administrative review. Revising this requirement will create a more friendly environment for new and existing businesses. 5. The category of conditional uses is intended for non - standard, atypical uses or elements. Section 2, Subd. 2.A. of the Zoning Ordinance states: "Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular zoning district, may under some circumstances be suitable. When such circumstances exist, a conditional use permit may be granted." There is no reason to consider outdoor seating "generally not suitable" in a planned unit development land use district that allows restaurants and retail as permitted uses. As long as standards are established that ensure that the seating will not pose a threat to public health, safety, and welfare, outdoor seating is a benefit to both the public and the individual business. 6. As the Planned Unit Development zoning for the site includes the Town Center Design & Development Guide, amending the Development Guide is considered a zoning amendment. Section 2, Subdivision 1 of the Zoning Ordinance requires consideration of possible adverse • • • • • • Ordinance No. 05 -10 page 2 effects of a proposed zoning amendment and that the judgment of a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance support the following policies found in the Policy Plan chapter of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan: Commercial Policies 5. Promote a full and broad range of office, service, retailing, dining, and entertainment uses within the commercial areas of Lino Lakes that address the needs of the residents. 6. Attract new businesses to Lino Lakes that are complementary to existing businesses, and will contribute to the customer attraction and business interchange of the local commercial areas. 16. Pursue retail and service providers that would complement the existing commercial land uses and /or contribute to the accumulative attraction of Lino Lakes' commercial areas In addition, the Land Use Plan chapter of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan lists the following strategies to be implemented to promote quality commercial areas. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance support these strategies. 1. The City will utilize its zoning regulations to define the range of commercial land use that may be appropriate for each proposed commercial location. Through its commercial site planning, the City will require new commercial development to be compatibly designed with surrounding land uses through the use of transitional and uses, proper setbacks, building orientation, screening and landscaping. 3. The City will promote commercial site designs that emphasize pedestrian accessibility, shared parking, and green space in an effort to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of business interchange among local businesses when feasible. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed amendments to the Town Center Design & Development Guide specify and clarify activities and uses that will be appropriate and compatible within specified land use districts. Ordinance No. 05-10 III page 3 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The proposed amendments are creating or revising the performance standards to ensure uses will conform with standards in the Town Center Design & Development Guide and the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Utility demand and traffic generation will continue to be addressed with new and existing uses, as required by the subdivision, zoning, and other chapters of the city code and official controls. The proposed amendments will not change this. 7. The Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on the amendments on March 10, 2010 and recommended approval. Section 2 Amendment of Zoning Ordinance Approved The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains that the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide is hereby amended as shown in ATTACHMENT A. Section 3 Town Center Design & Development Guide Stands As Amended As hereby amended, the Town Center Design & Development Guide shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 4 In Effect According to City Charter This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk • • • • • Ordinance No. 05-10 page 4 Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April. 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. ATTACHMENT A, Ordinance No. 05 -10 Amendments to Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide Additions shown underlined, deletions shown in strikethrough SECTION 3.1 ALLOWABLE USES Table 1. Allowable Land Uses in Mixed- Use, Commercial, and Civic Districts Allowable Land Use Commercial I Mixed Use Civic Commercial Uses Amusement enterprises including billiard halls, pinball & video arcades entirely within the principal use, but exclude driving ranges, miniature golf courses, and go -cart tracks. [1] [6] P - - Cinemas, theaters and auditoriums, except sports assembly, exhibit halls, and convention halls. • Eating places /restaurants /private clubs and lodges: • With outdoor dining /seating areas [4] [6] P P EA C A P C - P GA A P - - - ' - I - - - - • With drive - through or drive -up facilities [5] • With entertainment, bar or cocktail lounge at least 50 feet from the Residential District. [2] Finance services including banks, savings & loans, credit services: • With drive- through or drive -up facilities [5]. Drive-through or drive -up services not listed elsewhere [5] C - - Finance, insurance & real estate services, including security & commodity brokers & dealers, insurance & real estate agents, and • brokers; not includtt.i banks, savins & loans, & credit services. Food stores, including supermarkets, meat & fish stores, fruit & vegetable stores, candy stores, bakeries, health food stores, and catering establishments. 1 • With outdoor dining /seating areas [41 [61 P P A P A P P P A P A P - - I I - 1 J - 1' Convenience stores without gas pumps I. • With outdoor dining /seating areas [41 [61 Furniture & home furnishing retail sales, incl. household appliances, electronic equipment & office furniture. Must be less than 40,000 s.f. footprint. Garden supplies, excluding hay, grain & bulk feed sales and storage. Must be less than 40,000 s.f. footprint. P P - General merchandise retail, including but not limited to: variety, hardware, and dry goods stores, but excluding vending machine operators and direct selling organizations. Must be less than 40,000 s.f. footprint. P P - Miscellaneous retail trade including florists, tobacco shops, newspapers & magazines, camera & photo supplies, gifts, optical goods, pet sales & supplies, books, stationery, art & hobby supplies, antiques, stamps & coins, jewelry sales & minor repair. P P - Health clubs and gymnasiums. P - P Hotel P - - TABLE 1 NOTES: P = permitted use. C = conditional use. (See Appendix A for Conditions of Use) A = accessory to permitted or conditional use [1] Driving ranges and other outdoor amusement enterprises are prohibited because of their land- intensive nature. Hours of operation may be imposed as a condition of approval. 1 [2] Establishments that serve alcohol, and /or feature amplified music are conditionally permitted allowed as an 1 ' accessory use to restaurants subject to City Code requirements if they are at least 50 feet from the Residential' L District. j —73— • • • • • Allowable Land Use Commercial Mixed Use Civic Personal services including clothes laundering, photographic services, barber & beauty services, dry cleaning and shoe repairs, but excluding industrial laundering. P P - Professional services including medical & health offices & clinics, engineering & design services, legal and counseling services, but excluding laboratories, hospitals, sanitariums and rest homes. P P - Laboratories, hospitals, sanitariums, and rest homes. - - - Assisted Living Facilities, provided that they are not on the first floor of a building except they are allowed on the first floor of a building in areas with a 50% build to line or less. P P - Public & Quasi - Public Uses Indoor recreation facilities - - P Outdoor recreation facilities (floodlighting not to exceed 0.5 foot- candles at the property line of adjacent residential uses); - - P Concession stands (not exceeding 500 square feet); P P P Community- serving centers & facilities, including daycare an d senior, recreation & teen centers. P P P Cultural facilities including auditoriums, libraries and art galleries. P P P Semipublic facilities and institutions without sleeping accommodations, including the following: churches and other religious institutions, non -profit social service organizations, philanthropic and charitable institutions. P P P University, college, community college, and professional schools (except truck driving schools). P P P Residential Uses Residential units above ground -floor commercial space. - _ P - Temporary Uses Christmas tree or pumpkin lot sales, not to exceed 45 calendar days per year per type of sale. [6] P P P Farmers' markets including the sale of vegetables, fruit, baked goods, and other agricultural products, once a week and limited to 6 hours per week [3] P P P Art fairs & festivals, subject to City Code [6] P P P Temporary outdoor display and sales of merchandise associated with principle use A A - Other Uses See Section 1, Subd. 1 -E of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance [31 r[4] Outdoor dining/ seating is subject to Section 3, Subd. 16 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance except that: 1 1 dininu /seating may occur between buildings and within allowable building setbacks (see Table 3) :, and; I I()outdoor dining /seating may also occur on sidewalks within street rights -of -way, provided that there is a clear ' L passage for pedestrian movement that is at least 6 feet in width. , [5] Refer to the diagram on page 20 for guidance on siting drive- throughs. [6] The City may set limits on hours of operation to avoid nuisance issues. The City Planning Department may establish administrative standards. —74— page 2, Attachment A, Ord. No. 05 -10 APPENDIX A CONDITIONAL USES The uses identified in Table 1, Section 3.1 that require a Condition Use Permit shall be evaluated based on the following applicable criteria: A. E� Places /Outdoor Restaurants, Clubs and Loes: r 1. Accessory outdoor seating areas: dem nstrating the locati n and type of all table:, refuse receptacles, and wait stations. b. Access to tae diniFig arca ;hall be provided only via the principal building if the dining area is full service restaurant, including table waiting service. floor arca thin the principal structure. d. All lighting sl -al1 be hooded and directed away from adjacent residential uses in accordance in•ith Section 3, Subd. 1. F of thc Lin Lakes Zoning Ordinance. c. The applicant shall demonstrate that pedestrian circulation is not disrupted as a result of the outdoor dining area by providing the following: 1) Outdoor dining arca shall bc segregated from through pedestrian circulation by means of fencing, bollards, ropes, plantings, or other methods, and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 2) Minimum clear passage zone for pedestrians at thc perimeter of the restaurant shall bc at least mix (6) feet without interference from parked motor vehicles, bollards, trees, tree gate:, curbs, stairways, trash receptacles, street lights, parking meters, or thc lilac. 3) Overstory canopy of trees, umbrellas or other structures extending int the pedestrian clear pa- sage zone or pedestrian aisle shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7) feet above sidewalk. f. The dining area shall bc surfaced with concrete, bituminous or decorative pavers claan, attractive, and functional surface. A minimum width of thirty six (36) inches shall be provided within aisles of the outdoor dining arca. h. Storage of furniture shall not be permitted outdoors bebYeen N vcmbcr 1 and March 31. Outdoor furniture that is immovable or permanently fixed or attached to thc sidewalk shall not bc subject to the storage prohibition of this section. H wever, any immovable r permanently fixed r attached furniture must be approved as part of thc administrative permit application. 1 P. _• - - 'D ' containers shall be placed in a manner which does not disrupt pedestrian circulation, and must be designed to prevent spillage and blowing litter. —75— page 3, Attachment A, Ord. No. 05 -10 • • ?— Accessory drive - through facilities provided that: a. The stacking lane and its access must be designed to control traffic in a manner to protect the buildings and will not interfere with on -site traffic circulation or access to the required parking space. b. No part of the public street or boulevard may be used for stacking of automobiles. c. The stacking lane, order board intercom, and window placement shall be designed and located in such a manner as to minimize glare to adjacent premises, particularly residential premises, and to maximize maneuverability of vehicles on the site. d. The drive- through window and its stacking lanes shall be screened from view of adjoining residential zoning districts and public street rights -of -way. e. A lighting and photometric plan will be required that illustrates the drive - through service lane lighting and shall comply with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. B. Finance services including banks, savings & loans, credit services: no changes C. Drive - through or drive -up services not listed elsewhere provided that: no changes D. Temporary outdoor display and sales of merchandise associated with the principal use: no changes —76— page 4, Attachment A, Ord. No. 05 -10 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -30 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 05 -10 FOR PUBLICATION WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 05 -10, amending the Town Center Design & Development Guide Regarding Outdoor Dining /Seating; and WHEREAS, MN statute 412.191 provides for a city to publish a summary of an ordinance, and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the summary in Attachment A clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of Ordinance No. 05 -10, and WHEREAS, the publication in the official newspaper will include a notice that a full printed copy of the ordinance is available at City Hall, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council approves the summary in Attachment A for publication according to state law and the City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April . 2010. Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Bartell, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • • • ATTACHMENT A, Resolution No. 10 -130 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 05 -10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN CENTER DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT GUIDE REGARDING OUTDOOR DINING /SEATING Section 1: Findings: 1) The area called Legacy at Woods Edge, rezoned to Planned Unit Development by Ordinance No. 04 -04, is subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide as well as the Zoning Ordinance and City Code. 2) The Development Guide requires a conditional use permit for outdoor dining /seating for eating places /restaurants /private clubs and lodges. The Development Guide does not address outdoor seating for other uses. 3) A conditional use permit adds time and expense for a business without providing a benefit to the public that can't be otherwise provided. 4) Outdoor seating is a suitable use in the Commercial and Mixed Use land use districts. 5) The amendments support policies and strategies in the Comprehensive Plan. 6) Amending the Development Guide is considered a zoning amendment and the amendment meets applicable criteria. 7) The Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on the amendments on March 10, 2010 and recommended approval. Section 2: The Town Center Design & Development Guide is amended as follows: Section 3.1, Table 1: Outdoor Dining /Seating are accessory uses instead of conditional uses in the Commercial and Mixed Use land use districts for: Eating places /restaurants /private clubs and lodges; Food stores; and Convenience stores. Alcohol service is an accessory use instead of a conditional use. Outdoor dining /seating is subject to Section 3, Subd. 16 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance except as specified. Appendix A: Requirements for accessory outdoor seating areas are removed from the list of conditional uses because they will be accessory uses. Section 3 As above amended, said Development Guide shall stand as initially passed and previously amended. Section 4: This ordinance shall be in effect in accordance with the City Charter. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council on April 12, 2010. This is a summary of the adopted ordinance. A full printed copy of the ordinance is available at City Hall. • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: AGENDA ITEM 6D Marty Asleson April 12, 2010 Consider First Reading Of Ordinance No. 07 -10, Amending City Code Chapter 902: Tree Diseases, Relating To Emerald Ash Borer 3/5 BACKGROUND Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) is an invasive, non - native, introduced pest that came into the USA from ports in Detroit Michigan in 2002. Once EAB gets established in a City, all of the City's Ash trees will be killed in five to 10 years. In preparation for EAB it is suggested that as a first step, the City update its Tree Disease Ordinance to include controls for Emerald Ash Borer. Attached is a copy of the ordinance changes that the Lino lakes Environmental Board approved. With these proposed changes, this would be the first Reading of Ordinance 07 -10 which amends City Code Chapter 902, Shade Tree Disease Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Approve first reading of Ordinance 07 -10 ATTACHMENTS 1. Ordinance 07 -10. 1st Reading: Publication: 2nd Reading: Effective: Council Member moved for adoption of the following ordinance: CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 07 -10 Amending Title 900, Chapter 902 of the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances relating to Tree Diseases. The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains: Section 1. That Section 902.01 of the above - entitled ordinance be amended by adding thereto a new subdivision (3) to read as follows: 902.01 NUISANCES DECLARED. The following are declared to be public nuisances whenever and wherever they may be found in the city. (3) All Species and Varieties of Ash trees (trees of the genus Fraxinus) infested with Emerald Ash borer (Agriiusplanipennis Fairmarie), and all species and varieties of Ash trees that are dead or substantially dead, all dead ashwood to which the bark is still attached which because of their condition, may serve as a breeding place for Emerald Ash Borer (Agriiusplanipennis Fairmarie), are hereby declared to be public nuisances and furthermore all ash trees are hereby declared to be public nuisances as determined by (2) or more visual symptoms as listed herein; basal sprouting, bark fissures, woodpecker damage (holes). One - eighth inch (1/8 ") D shaped holes, presenence of larvae or the adult Emerald Ash borer (Agriiusplanipennis Fairmarie), bark falling off exposing S shaped galleries. Section 2. That Section 902.03 of the above - entitled ordinance be amended to read as follows: 902.03. INSPECTION AND INVESTIGATION. The Council may designate a person or persons who shall inspect all premises and places within the city as often as practical or necessary to determine whether any condition described in § 902.01 exists thereon. The tree inspector shall investigate all reported incidents of infestation by oak wilt fungus or Dutch elm fungus or elm bark beetles or emerald ash borer. The tree inspector so designated by the Council may enter upon private premises at any • • • • • • reasonable time for the purpose of carrying out the duties assigned to him or her under this chapter. That person or persons shall, upon finding conditions indicating oak wilt, GF Dutch elm infestation, or emerald ash borer take steps for diagnosis as may be appropriate, including analysis by a qualified laboratory of twig samples from actively wilting branches. Whenever possible, diagnosis shall be based upon accepted field symptoms. Section 3. That Section 902.05, subdivision (1), of the above- entitled ordinance be amended to read as follows: 902.05 PROCEDURE FOR ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL. (1) Whenever it is found with reasonable certainty that the infestation exists, he or she shall proceed as follows. If the tree inspector finds that the danger of infestation of other oak, -9r elm, or ash trees is not imminent, he or she shall notify the owner of the property on which the nuisance is found by certified mail addressed to the owner at his or her last known address that the nuisance must be abated within a time specified in the notice, but in no event later than April 15 of the following year. The tree inspector shall immediately report the action to the Council and after the expiration of the time limited by the notice, the tree inspector may proceed to abate the nuisance as herein provided. The cost of the abatement shall be assessed against the owner of the property involved or against the property itself. Section 4. That Section 902.05 of the above - entitled ordinance be amended by adding thereto a new subdivision (9) to read as follows: 902.05 PROCEDURE FOR ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL. (9) Trees of all ash trees found to be infected with Emerald Ash Borer must be treated and disposed of as to be in compliance with all recommendations of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Section 5. That Section 902.05 of the above - entitled ordinance be amended to read as follows: 902.06 TRANSPORTING ELM AND OAK WOOD PROHIBITED. It is unlawful for any person to transport within the city any bark - bearing eim, 9r---oak, or ash wood without having obtained a permit from the city forester. The city forester shall grant the permits only when the purposes of this chapter will be served thereof. Section 6. Effective This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • • AGENDA TTEM 6Ei STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DAT E: April 12, 2010 TOPIC: Resolution No. 10 -27, Accepting_ Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract, 2010 Street Overlay Project Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:30 a.m. on March 31, 2010. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Rum River Contracting GMH Asphalt Corp. North Valley, Inc. Knife River Corp. Valley Paving Northwest Asphalt T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. Hardrives Inc. Asphalt Surface Tech Engineer's Estimate Amount of Bid $ 206,446.60 $ 222,817.05 $ 225,638.10 $ 226,418.98 $ 229,001.00 $ 233,791.35 $ 242,172.88 $ 268,781.00 $ 335.336.00 $ 255.185.00 The low bids are competitive bids for this project. A copy of the complete bid tabulation is attached. The final completion date for this project is July 31, 2010. A summary of the Lino Lakes Pavement Management System will be presented at the May 5th Council Work Session. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Resolution No. 10 — 27 Accepting_ Bids and Awarding_ a Construction Contract for the 2010 Street Overlay Project be adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -27 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, 2010 STREET OVERLAY PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of 2010 Street Overlay Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Rum River Contracting GMH Asphalt Corp. North Valley, Inc. Knife River Corp. Valley Paving Northwest Asphalt T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. Hardrives Inc. Asphalt Surface Tech Engineer's Estimate Amount of Bid $ 206,446.60 $ 222,817.05 $ 225,638.10 $ 226,418.98 $ 229,001.00 $ 233,791.35 $ 242,172.88 $ 268,781.00 $ 335,336.00 $ 255,185.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Rum River Contracting is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Rum River Contracting, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the 2010 Street Overlay Project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and ciirected to return forthwith to all bidders the Bid Bonds made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. • • • Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April, 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • TABULATION OF BIDS 2010 OVERLAY PROJECT TKDA CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 14563.002 IIlP.NFHnnc •Pncm,rcn n! • ri nnm &z BIDS OPENED: MARCH 31, 20101P30 AM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE RUM RIVER CONTRACTING GMH ASPHALT NORTH VALLEY INC. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY ___ UNIT _ PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT I I I 11 1 $ 5,562.50 $ 832.50 Li 1 g�8 mo 4 00 0 4 $ 1,525.00 82,700.00 S 300.00 1 81888888 Oo060OD1 400 1- OJ -a 0 *0049ow* 9- N 01— N m' J• I 1D m ^ 10 10 1- o J I I giojo 6168 M 1011L11�I01 N N _ 00 10 OOW 4) fD _ _ *00000000 °0 ° ID m _ 1 0 $1I8 66'6816 W N !Q 1 $�$ W gI4 4 �0Ny IN }$ 2247.50 L m {m 1:. 1400 O n o m m 10 o - MM n a m N o I to I Iw o I oI D g W10 P) 19 00o00000l000 logo g 81m m�m14'WID)O10 0 iD N _ W IW o1ry 81N N m 0) 9. 014) W I_ 0 0' -1 ID W re, g g m 0 1o080008181808":8N8m8 to Ip I10D 1,6 10043000 O O o 1)ID O me Nm�1�(0p *00000 00 IO al • W N4Nm r, *0000 $ 50.50 $ 2.50 $ 57.00 $ 8.25 $ 1.85 mm NM 010 g18 00 NNI 00 $ 825.00 $ 335.00 8E28828°Nm �,- N 00* 1Om/ON�mOJ *00 *1000 C'i I I $ 5,750.00(_ 88 gg 10110 049 $ 720.00 $ 6,384.00 $ 8,800.00 $ 2,022.75 $ 300.00 _$_ 1,550.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 6,800.00 3 3,527.50 $ 7,700.00 8888 Qoo° 9. 0000 D 40 $ 70,252.50 $ 1,830.00 $ 61,105.00 $ 750.00 $ 4,304.00 $ 2,680.00 L$ 827.80 $ 3,150.09 $ 290.09 $ 182.50_ $ 208.50 a R N f0 1^ 0 1,500.00 $ 300.00 $ 422.00 $ 1,895.00 $ 576.00 $ 522.50 $_ 684.00 $ 100.00 $ 750.00 $ 580.00 $ 21,109.00 $ 2,452.50 $ 315.00 $ 208.50 n ^ _ 10 0 mm e� W.'''. '1 00 10 e " fNN�j $ 5,750.00 4) 0, 08 881011 W' 0000000004900 000000 8m^o00'OO M 'ID (1011.- 0 N $ 2.00I 5.00 4048(4)) I91n�t0N 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 33 00110 N4) 0 03 $ 31.39 $ 10.50 $ 2.90 $ 3.25 $_ 1,500.00 $ 300.00 $ 211.00 $ 339.00 o um), .-081(0111)0IID movtn 0000000000 pp uia�mOe $ 2,700.00 L $ 500.00 _I 08 66 QQ 00 $ exam I- $ $ 2,800.00 0011101,00 660m6 000(0IIDD70. 049000 $ 1,582.55_ $ 1,538.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 2,507.50 $ 4,812.50 O0 00 9- 00 $ 320.00j $ 210.00 oo•oee' i $ 09'119'69 $ $ 80,445.00 $ 300.00 $ 1,752.00 $ 2,590.00 OOO dm 100s- 0 000 8 200.00 $ 150.00 O^ 0 e4~- 0 1 1,200.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,026.00 $ 2,290.00 $ 525.00 $ 950.00 $ 472.00 $ 40.00450.00 480.00 00N N N 8 0 b 10 0 $ 174,948.10 $ 31,500.50 O N 0 $ 2,700.00I $ 500.00 8888,7:2 8e886.- 40).40110M 9- $ 512.00 $ 0.70 $ 2.95 $ 125.00 8M l 0 0 $ 2.00 $ 3.00 $ 48.15 $ 3.00 $ 54.95 _$ 2.00 10 0 6, .0.1.040961. 1 4) N O)I-N [$_$ 2.00 ;_ 3.00 L$ 1,200.00 $ 500.00 $ 513.00 8 1- 010 828888 0 0 N10I0M' 0 0 0 8 8 , 4 0 0 0 0 I I1 I 8 2 60 oo O O 0* $ 80ov0 $ 8,000.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,790.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 4,675.00 $ 3850.00 oo .- Y 21080880 g 0) m Q I° 0 W m m g IOD 10 3- M g 00 m m $ . 240.00 $ 1,200.00 Ir$_. 450.00 $___ 100.00 0 109 Oa M 0000 00 0 0J0, *0 11-71,200.00 I $ 2,400.00 $ 450.00 I $ 2,250.00 $ 450.00 $ 1,350.00 S 1.00 $ 950.00 $ 6.00 $ _ 960.00 $ 5.00 $ 100.00 $ 5.00 750.00 $ 3.00 $ 480.00 I Q g NN 1° h. — N N 4)Q W 8 I D 0 10 oo,00, n N ft.,. N 00 o0 m N I0 $ 59 900 $ 1,000.00 $ 200.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 20.00 $ 450.00 $ 0.70 $ 5.50 $ 100.00 *10000 $ 12.00 $ 4.00 88 NM 0* 11 3,000.00 s 1,000.00 J -/13.1-1 J W U m UW m U,C-3J y CO Z o FZ- J CO W 4-3030) - J J J W J J W U J J 0 H-1 y J 0 0 0 0 0 40 112.0 4.0 155.0 '. 3.0 12000.0 850.0 38.5 6.6.°686 r) .--''-"r A'4) W 100.0 70.0 o0000 C Ng0W11D p 01 O0 -- 5.0 3.0 950.0 180.0 C g1 380.0 150.0 30.0 50.0 2010 OVERLAY - PROJECT A (WOODUCK TRAIL FROM MAIN STREET TO ANDALL STREET) MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL CLEAR AND GRUB TREESJ' DIAMETER OR GREATER) REMOVE 30 " CMP CULVERT INSTALL 30" RCP CULVERT (TIE ALL JOINTS) INSTALL 30 " RCP FES SUBGRADE EXCAVATION GEOTEXTILE STABILIZATION FABRIC SELECT GRANULAR BORROW REHABILITATE CATCH BASINS RECLAIM BITUMINOUS HAUL OUT EXCESS MILLINGS (LV) RESHAPE MILLINGS (3% CROWN) REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 2360 (LVNW 35030) 8111JMIINOUS MATERIAUDA TACK COAT BIf UMINOUS WEARING COURSE (LVWE 45030) (BITUMINOUS CURBING BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT TOPSOIL BORROW WITH SEED SODDING AND TOPSOIL BORROW 1EROISION CONTROL BLANKET WITH SEED SILT FENCE IBICIDEGRADABLE FIBER EROSION CONTROL ROLLS 2010 OVERLAY - PROJECT B (CLEARVYATER'CREEK FROM CEDAR STREET TO 270' SOUTH OF ANDALL STREET) MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL REPAIR AND ADJUST CATCH BASIN ADJUST MANHOLE ADJUST VALVES- RECLAIM BITUMINOUS PAUL OUT EXCESS MILLINGS (LV) SAW CUT CONCRETE FOR CATCH BASINS REMOVE OF AND DISPOSE OF CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (LVWE 45030)_ 0412 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SODDING AND TOPSOIL BORROW BIODEGRADABLE FIBER EROSION CONTROL ROLLS SUBTOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT A_ PROJECT B TOTAL PROJECT A AND PROJECT B - N 9 4 W ml� m mO, 1^l 0 4 Wm @ l' 0ID) @I^ N N 0 N 104 N NIN 0 NIN m I9.103 N N - N 1914 Wim r I m 0 0, -1^ I- 9,4 -I- • • !i I ii ! I i I I TKDA PROJECT NO. 14563002 bil BIDS OPENED' MARCH 31, 20101030 AM "DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION KNIFE RIVER NORTH BRANCH VALLEY PAVING NORTHWEST ASPHALT T.A. Schifsky 8 Sons ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL Nn DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT $ 7,900.00 $ 515.00 $ 412.00 $ 3,090.00 $ 925.35 $ 495.00 $ 1,27720 $_1,17420 moo 0 01')NIN �9pp A 9) to A 0 O Q _ Q 91919149 $ 859.20 $__ 288.40 0fp wlo00 m 0 N1O ..- 10 949191494999491499 pp S N O) 010 100011D0 0 (DIN e) 4)Ir• ID O)IC14) N N 0 4) Q ^ 010 m 4)14) N 0 P CO 0 Im O O 4) IO N 49 1'� $ 926.00 $ 2,080.00 _$__ 386.25 $ _ 1,273.00 $ 824.00 $ 31.00 $ 463.50 $ 329.80 $ 22,800.00 19 I2 IC IIA le) In IN -r $ 208,959.53 $ 33,583.36 m I»'4 N N I9 0 of9 0 010 op 4)IO N 10 9 N 491949491 C o N Iq CD $ 772.50 $ 5.97 $ 1.85 8.24 oleo 0 0 c10) A .10 0i ' e) 0 01ry N N 9964 ne 10 d' vlo O m O co N'6 949 o 0) O .- 0) 9949149949 0 P) C N 0) Q 047 CO - N 4i 014) an o tV 9149 40 0 N N 01018 010 O 10 ^I0 9 9 0 O e) nImie-'1.6 Q RI.N 49 49 01F14) �11?Ir- --i 49149 49 0 0 4) O e- en 49 49 plow" O0 01Q NICIIn fp1� 919149 4)10) •IO )nIN 49149 I 1 1 1 _1 111 $ 2,650.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 7,448.00 $ 2,660.00 $ 2,383.75 $ 300.00 $ 1,550.00 $ 6,600.00 p 0 0 0 NrP dui 4) 9 $ 740.00 $ 240.00 $ 560.00 $ 350.00 _ $ 74,385.00 $ 1,830.00 $ 62,425.00 $ 750.00 0 0 00 0 om e) N 499 $ 700.00 $ 2,850.00 $ 400.00 1-$ 400000 10 m ". 49 $ 500.00 $ 350.00 00'OSL'I. SI 00'00Z'Z $ 1$ 800.00 $ 4,275.00 $ 1.80 $ 100.00 $ 1,125.00 $ 480.00 $ 23,123.00 $ 2,325.00 $ 345.00 $ 300.00 o 4- a 4- N » o m� nq 10 A 0 0 4949 Io 01 0 0 49 00 °0, 00lop 9D 0 N 49 49 p 000 00ID 01 9 49149 C 114) 0401 A� 49 °o to -10 ^ 19 99.49 otO Oo O N N 19 49 $ 6.00 $ 150.00 00 o 141 00 O0°n, N0104) 961639491999994949 010-, In 0340 00 N Q CO I°D, 6 O)<90110 63494999 o 00 o °000 o0 O N 99 $ 1,100.00 $ 350.00 $ 200.00 $ 4.50 $ 0.01 $ 5.00 $ 7.50 $ 3.00 v°). 0 p 8 0 otD 10 '- 0 A 91631 $ 1,000.00_ $ 1,260.00 $ 7,336.00 $ 4,900.00 2,208.75 345.00 64325 $ 3,525.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 4,930.00 $ 4,235.00 $ 740.00 $ 240.00 $ 800.00 $ 560.00 $ 72,964.00 $ 1,830.00 $ 61,800.00_ $ 225.00 $__ 4,840.00 $ 2,590.00 ° l o 0° 8C 0 IDI ID � m 49 99 J 285.00 $ _ 162.50 I0 0 O •` m a N $ 1,300.00 $ 360.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,375.00 $ 825.00 $ 76.0.00 8181 6 C N V 6).- 4949 $__ 787.50 $ 480.00 $ 22,800.00 0 8 N ID4) CD I- e) N 49 49 0 10 ? 0 N ID 9f 49 M °o, )-< e Co.., 0 49 °o, 10 - CD 0 0 NI N 9 49 $ 7,550.00 $ 515.00 0 0 117 N G N 9699 0 4) �I $ 14.25 $ 1.15 4') Q $ 0.40 $ 5.80 0 0 0 o Nlei .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 6349 $ 3.00 $ 58.00 $ 1.50 0 0 co O N 904999 0 0 O col m Ci $ 2.85 $ 3.25 11- 1,300.00 $ 360.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 275.00 $ 275.00 $ 0.80 O N ,a n 4949 $ 5.25 $ 3.00 0 Im 91499 0 0 0 ei $ 7,050.00 $ 500.00_ 000 o40D !D CO 49949 V 0) fD $ 1,550.00 $ 825.00 $ 1,880.00 $ 1,575.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 4,301.00 $ 3,945.48 O01N0 ,-e N� - N T N r 94999 $ 1,244.40 $ 60,874.00 $ 910.50 IIDD N O 4) Q N 985.00 $ 2,985.00 $ 275.00 $_ 157.50 . n. ^ I0) 9 pO 00 O CO 49 9 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,500.00 p OO 3-- CD 0) 499 I $ 1,078.40 $ 60.00 $__ 712.50 $____ __ 328.40 $ 298.50 j 197.50 • 0) N 0 I9 m.7 Of _ N 0. 0)N 949 IT m e N 0 149 0 0 000 0 0 010 999499949999494919919 0 8 0 0 N 0 0 0 4ND 0 m OW 01 -001- 0 ni 0 0 N N �0 0 SIQ) 0 OIC 0 Q 00 m $ 3.00 $ 2.72 $ 3.00 $ 50.49 $ 2.04 $ 55.34 $ 6.07 m 0 9701 N ton 919494949919 4) 4) -0)I N D) ID 4) -4-0) Pi 9) ID en 0 02 PP o or 94914Q9149 0 0000 O p 100 e)N 0 N In eV 949 $ 8.74 $ 3.00 ti CI.- 0100070 Q nil 991499199 0 - m o 40 to 0)147 J J W-, 1 W U CO U W CO U I C J J y CO r 0 H-I CO } y U CO CO 1 J J J {) I J 1 to U J 1� I Z 1.1. f% J loo 120.0 IOV 0. �Q' - 10ti° O 17 171:1761_-_1 3.0 goo 047103 T 08197 I 000° 00047 [h m °•°Coop I- 'rIm °4) 160.0 70.0 ° °• 0 86810 N 0 ° ?° ID 0 00 2.0 5.0 3.0 950.0 160.0 20.0 001 ' p01m r1[n °00 T C01 O0 970 2010 OVERLAY - PROJECT A )WOODUCK TRAIL FROM MAIN STREET TO ANDALL STREET) MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL INSTALL 30" RCP CULVERT (TIE ALL JOINTS) INSTALL 311P RCP FES • RECLAIM BITVIVIINOUS C HAUL OUT EXCESS MILLINGS (1..y.) RESI.IAPE MILLINGS 13% CROWN) BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (LVWE 45030) BITUMINOUS CURBING SODDING AND TOPSOIL BORROW EROSION CONTROL BLANKET WITH SEED SILT FENCE II i 1 Q C.3 1.- W C a 0 1- o m 2010 OVERLAY - PROJECTS )CLEARVVATER CREEK FROM CEDAR STREET TO 270' SOUTH OF ANDALL STREET) IHAUL OUT EXCESS MILLINGS LLV) BARN SAW el IT CENCRFTF Pi-in CATCH BASINS BIODEGRADABLE FIBER EROSION CONTROL ROLLS 0 0 U a „) 1- O II- 0 w 1-m 0U W W C C as TOTAL PROJECT A AND PROJECT 8 ) 14 rIDIl1O1 INi4ni 41[0 I �.--I nIm10,10 -INltn V10 •- . -.-I NIN NI NININ 1 0)I- NIN CO N .- NIfn?14I40 I e-oeol001 -IN' R 1 I I i I- N N N NN NNNN N N N NN N N N N NININ NN N N N 19 N N N N N N 49 49 N i l _l 1 N NN NN N N N N NN N N N NN N N IN N N N N to ca. moss N et. NNN N le* en. N $ 8,480.00 $ 1,838.00 3,118.50 $__1,198.80 432.00 $ 518.40 $ 378.00 $ 77,560.50 $ 1,35420 $ _ 66,264.00 333.00 $ 3,90720 09Zc9 $ 00'90L'E $ $ 162.00 $ 203.50 0!!8C'08Z $ 188.8888E8881 IO ID m O.- N OID NN �Ol rN 9464 M o m 1D V N m 0. N N N ID co l- V N IDV N I71m N M M to N j $ 3,553.50 $ 307.50 $ 203.50 0' w N T 0' N �n tD Oi co 49 a7 at N49 N M q m n 0' VI M co 0 V CS NVNV N m MOO NNNtN O V O a, osier V NNNV O) M N tea NNNNNN N N oco N N N $ 44.40 $ 30.84 ID PI NID O N NNNN V I� NO IO C $ 3,000.00 $ 515.00 $ 818.00 $ 540.00_ $ 218.00 $ 1.06 co co co V N or m fV N CD 0 'TICS IV at N 64164 O> iD NO co o NN ti Q °og O IDco m INN �$ 3,943.50 $ 943.50 $ _ 422.40 $ 728.00 $ 700.00 $ 76 850.00 $ 1,549.40 $ 70,400.00 $ 783.00 8 5,760.00 $ 2,712.50 $ 640.00 $ 3,210.00 $ 300.00 $ 187.50 m N N 0 m O N N N ol0000o O I 0 0111) CD 01+00 a,I71-tD ID N6*44*9 0 o Ill O O I O Nr- ti N [V tV 49. N $ 2.40 $ 384.00_ $ 7.80 $ 158.00_ $ 8.00 $ 1,200.00 g1ID 0 o V ID 'NIN I 49I49 6O OI01- NIo 49 NNNN i N 1414 14N co O $ 4.25 $ 212.50 f 45,584.60 om om m R ^ 6 rifler N MN m 4- m N N 0C O NN $ 94.00 $ 2.55. $ 5.28 00IDpo Np ID ID O O < O O N er tD m7m NNNNNNNNN 0 ti p O O O M 64 49 W N co Q NN 1_$ 5,900.00 $ 375.00 $ 850.00 $ 500.00 $ 240.00 $ 2.33 0 EC J J 0 fCDD c¢7 Z J CO w U O) CO J J J co < J J y 0 J J O Z I J 14) I I J 38.5 370.0 00.0 180.0_ 70.0 1450.0 810.0 1100.0 p 0 0 0 p 0 50.0 oO 3.0 950.0 180.0 20.0 150.0 180.0_ 380.0 150.0 30.0 50.0 RESHAPE MILLINGS (3% CROWN SAW CUT BITUMINOUS STREET 40-5 -DRIVEWAY SAW CUT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEVIIAY PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 2360 (LVNW 35030) BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FFOR TACK COAT BITUMOUS IN WEARING COURSE (LVWE 45030) 511 OMINOUS CURBING BI LUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SODDING AND TOPSOIL BORROW EROISION CONTROL BLANKET WITH SEED SILT FENCE BBIObEEGRADABLEE FIBER EROSION CONTROL ROLLS I d 0 • W i c • 1- I O .= I 2010 OYERLAY -- PROJECT B (CLEARWATER CREEK FROM CEDAR STREET TO 210' BOOTH OF ANDALL STREET) MOBILIZATION _ _ TRAFFIC CONTROL _ fFPAIR ANO ADJUST CATCH BASIN IRAUL -OW EXCESS MILLINGS -LV) SAW CUT CONCRETE FOR CATCH BASINS REMOVE OF ANT) DISPOSE OF CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE1LVWE45030) _ 0412 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER _ SODDING ANO TOPRO L BORROW IRKJUEGRADABLE FIBER EROSION CONTROL ROLLS m 0 10 a 0 ._ O] IOl PROJECT A PROJECT B _._ - or 0 VIN ID 1- cola, OI- INII.) Vt1D ID - I. -I,N NININ NIN N co N N .- NII7 V ID CD I� 1 ID a,�° {ter. m V AGENDA ITEM 6Eii ii STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tames E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DA1 E: April 12, 2010 TOPIC: Resolution No. 10 -28, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract, 2010 Street Sealcoat Project Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 11:00 a.m. on March 31, 2010. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid Pearson Bros., Inc. $ 129,970.00 Astech Asphalt Surface $ 137,285.00 Allied Blacktop Company $ 144,650.00 Precision Sealcoating, Inc. Incomplete Engineer's Estimate $ 13 9,125.00 The low bids are competitive bids for this project. The bid from Precision Sealcoating, Inc. as shown on the attached tabulation of bids was not considered because the bid was incomlete. The final completion date for this project is September 15, 2010. A summary of the Lino Lakes Pavement Management System will be presented at the May 5th Council Work Session. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Resolution No. 10 — 28 Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract, 2010 Street Sealcoat Project to be adopted. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -28 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, 2010 STREET SEALCOAT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of 2010 Street Sealcoat Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Amount of Bid Pearson Bros., Inc. $ 129,970.00 Astech Asphalt Surface $ 137,285.00 Allied Blacktop Company $ 144,650.00 Precision Sealcoating, Inc. Incomplete Engineer's Estimate $ 139,125.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Pearson Bros., Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Pearson Bros., Inc., in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the 2010 Street Sealcoat Project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the Bid Bonds made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April, 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.. _9Q_ • • • 0 0 00 r.-o o o 0 0 I 0 0 t- 0) L6 v: 0i N N FA Fri W CIO 710 FA ER : O O O co Im 0) ti) a ti ti F/4 FA di O ei qt 0 0 0 0 tri o 0 ID N 7 t) M O at r N T 0) in r- r 614 ER FA LC) IL) NN...... O Er 1 PI EA Fri 0) LBS O O O O t[) ,00 O 2010 SEALCOAT I BITUMINOUS SEALCOATING W/1/8" TRAP ROCK CRACK SEALING - (MATERIAL SUPPLIED BYCITYI TOTAL 2010 SEALCOAT - ry I 69 69 rt 2010 SEALCOAT PROJECT J CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA Elll;iq, TKDA PROJECT NO. 14563.001 The right I BIDS OPENED: MARCH 31, 2010, AT 11:00 AM "DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ASTECH ASPHALT SURFACE ALLIED BLACKTOP CO. ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNI1 NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY _ UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRIC CO O 0 oio In o CO O ri, 0 lb CD C er er I Gra $ 0£'L $ $ 129,285.00 $ 8,000.00 C$ 137,285.00 ti0 •r••0 r- CV 69 SY LBS O O O O O O O O LO 0 o e' 2010 SEALCOAT _ BITUMINOUS SEALCOATING W/1/8" TRAP ROCK 1CRACK SEALING - (MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY CITY) TOTAL 2010 SEALCOAT 1 I� N • • STAFF ORIGLNATOR: CITY COUNCIL 1VIEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 6F James E. Studenski, City Engineer April 12, 2010 Resolution No. 10 -29, Approving Plans and Specification and Authorizing Ad for Bids, Pine Street, Zodiac Street and Howard Lake Drive Paving Improvements. ACTION REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The feasibility report for this paving improvement project was prepared in coordination with the City of Columbus. The estimated improvement project costs to pave Pine Street from Lake Drive to 4th Avenue are $398,500. The costs to pave Pine Street will be split as a 50% - 50% cost share with the City of Columbus. The project will be 100% assessed to the benefiting properties. Attached is the location map for the project. A Public Hearing was held for the Pine Street Paving Improvements on October 26, 2009. Before any further action could be taken on the proposed project as required by the City Charter 60 days was required to elapse following the Public Hearing, that date was December 25, 2009. The Public Hearing was initiated by a resident petition to research the costs of paving Pine Street. The City of Columbus will be approving plans and specifications and authorizing ad for bids at their upcoming City Council meeting. The tentative schedule for this project is as follows: Bid Opening Assessment Hearing and Award of Contract for Improvements City of Columbus Award Contract for Improvements Begin Construction Complete Construction May 13, 2010 May 24, 2010 May 26, 2010 Summer 2010 Fall 2010 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving Resolution Number 10 -29, Approving Plans and Specification and Authorizing Ad for Bids, Pine Street, Zodiac Street and Howard Lake Drive Paving Improvements. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -29 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING AD FOR BIDS, PINE STREET, ZODIAC STREET AND HOWARD LAKE DRIVE PAVING IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 28th day of September 2009 a date for a council hearing on the proposed paving improvements of Pine Street from Lake Drive to 4th Avenue by paving a bituminous surface, AND WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 26th day of October, 2009, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, AND WHEREAS, The costs to pave Pine Street will be split as a 50% - 50% cost share with the City of Columbus and it is proposed to finance the project with special assessments assessed 100% to the benefited property owners, AND WHEREAS, this improvement project will be subject to a Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Columbus and the City of Lino Lakes Regarding the Pine Street Paving Improvements and Maintenance, WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the council on January 25, 2010, TKDA has prepared plans and specifications for the paving improvement of Pine Street and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at City Hall, are hereby approved. 2. The City clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the Clerk, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on May 24, 2010, in the • • • Council Chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Jeff Reinert, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April, 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. _95— CITY OF COLUMBUS CITY OF LINO LAKES PINE STREET, ZODIAC STREET AND HOWARD LAKE DRIVE PAVING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT • I 1 Rural Nature 'than Ac: r- : CCITY OF OLUM BUS M'NNESO'A AK; PRC' s �6c f' 1 'i 1 , 7 PRO LO c ZODIAC STREET PINE STREET r 4 DRAWING INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET 2 DETAILS, LEGEND & ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 3 PINE STREET STA. 0+00 TO 35+00 - STREET PAVING 4 PINE STREET STA. 35+00 TO 70+00 - STREET PAVING 5 PINE STREET STA. 70+00 TO 73+57 STREET PAVING 6 ZODIAC STREET STA. 0+00 TO 20+75 STREET PAVING 7 HOWARD LAKE DRIVE STA. 0+00 TO 32+00 STREET PAVING 8 HOWARD LAKE DRIVE STA.32+00 TO 51 +71 STREET PAVING THIS PLANSET CONTAINS 8 SHEETS SPECIFICATION REFERENCE THE 2005 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION *STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION ", DIVISIONS II & III, AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO, AND SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL INPLACE UTILITIES MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN & THOSE THAT ARE SHOWN, MAY NOT BE SHOWN IN THE EXACT LOCATIONS. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLANSET IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVELS IX AS DEFINED IN ASCE "STANDARD GUIDELINE FOR THE DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA'. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL: 1. 800.252 -1166 APPROVED: LINO LAKES CITY ENGINEER FOR PINE STREET PAVING IMPROVEMENTS DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Lorry D. Bohrer DATE LIC. NO. 12120 TKDA PROJ. NO. 14578.001 14578.002 AND 14578.003 TKDA ENGINEERING • ARCHREC 1JHE • PLANNING • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 6G Michael Grochala April 12, 2010 Consider Resolution No. 10 -32, Authorizing Preparation of Signal Justification Reports for the Birch St./Ware Road & Lake Drive /Main Street Intersections 3/5 The City has previously received requests from residents to consider the signalization of the Lake Drive /Main Street intersection and the Birch StreetNVare Road intersection. Both intersections are experiencing growing congestion and safety problems. The preparation of a Signal Justification Report (SJR) is required when considering the installation of a new signal system. The purpose of the report is to evaluate the existing and proposed traffic conditions of the intersection and insure that the traffic signal will improve the traffic flows and safety of the intersection. TKDA, the city's consulting engineer, has estimated the cost of completing the two reports at $6,800 to $10,000. The cost range reflects additional steps in the process that may need to be undertaken based on the initial analysis. No funding was programmed in the 2010 budget for the preparation of these reports. Staff would recommend that the council appropriate funding for the studies from the contingency fund at this time. If the projects proceed to construction and a permanent funding source is determined the costs can then be reimbursed. Once the SJR's are completed and a determination has been made on the whether the signal systems should be installed, a separate feasibility study will need to be commenced to determined the scope and costs of the improvement. Staff will coordinate and work with Anoka County on the possible intersection improvements throughout the process. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 10 -32 ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 10 -32 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 10 -32 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF SIGNAL JUSTIFICATION REPORTS FOR THE BIRCH ST/WARE ROAD INTERSECTION AND THE LAKE DRIVE /MAIN STREET INTERSECTION WHEREAS, the intersections of Lake Drive and Main Street; and Birch Street and Ware Road are currently experiencing growing congestion and safety problems; and WHEREAS, the City has previously received requests from residents to consider the signalization of both intersections; and WHEREAS, the city is proposing to prepare Signal Justification Reports to determine if traffic signal improvements are warranted to improve safety and relieve congestion at each intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That preparation of Signal Justification Reports for the Lake Drive /Main Street intersection and the Birch StreetNVare Road intersection is hereby authorized. 2. That the staff is hereby authorized to enter into a professional services agreement with TKDA, the city engineer, for the preparation of said reports, in the not to exceed amount of $10,000 total for both reports. Jeff Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of April, 2010. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 22, 2010 DRAFT CITY OF LINO LAKES 2 MINUTES 3 4 DATE : March 22, 2010 5 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. 6 TIME ENDED : 6:20 p.m. 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Members Gallup, O'Donnell, Roeser 8 and Mayor Reinert 9 MEMBERS ABSENT : Council Member Rafferty 10 11 12 Staff members present: Acting City Administrator Dan Tesch; Police Captain Kent 13 Strege; City Planner Jeff Smyser; City Planner Paul Bengtson; City Clerk Julie Bartell 14 15 REVIEW REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 16 17 Item 3A), Convention & Visitors Bureau Appointment — Acting Administrator Tesch 18 explained that the city has been infolined that the appointment to the bureau must be either 19 a council member or city staff person. The city's economic development coordinator, 20 Mary Alice Divine, has been attending the meetings to this point and he is recommending 21 that she be appointed. 22 Item 3D), Lease with North Memorial Ambulance — Acting Administrator Tesch asked 23 that this item be postponed at the council meeting. There is some new language proposed 24 that should be reviewed by the city attorney. 25 Item 6A), Resolution denying a variance request to the Zoning Ordinance 26 requirements for accessory structure area and the number of accessory structures 27 allowed on a rural property — City Planner Bengston reported that a variance request to 28 allow for an additional accessory structure (horse training facility) at 1288 Main Street is 29 being recommended for denial by staff and the Planning & Zoning Board. Findings are 30 presented in the staff report supporting that recommendation. Should the council wish to 31 approve the variance request, there are conditions recommended and those as well are laid 32 out in the staff report. It was confirmed that denying the variance request would not halt 33 the activities (horse training) already occurring at the property. Discussion of the 34 possibility of erecting the structure on leased state owned land merited no clear ability to 35 solve the issue other than the understanding that if the applicants owned that property, they 36 would have enough acreage to legally build the additional structure proposed. A council 37 member noted some possible benefits to allowing the structure — longer season, less horse 38 related run -off. The council recognized that it would be a dangerous precedent to allow 39 leased land to be counted for the purpose of land use regulations. 40 41 Item 6B), First Reading of ordinance amending the Planned Unit Development for 42 the Town Center Design & Development Guide Regarding Outdoor Dining /Seating - 43 City Planner Smyser noted this amendment relates to the design standards for the Town 44 Center area. This mirrors what was approved for the rest of the city. —96— CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 22, 2010 DRAFT 45 Two council members noted that they had received calls questioning the impact of recently 46 approved changes to the outdoor seating /dining requirements. City Planner Smyser 47 clarified that the changes would not unfairly restrict certain establishments from obtaining 48 permission for outdoor dining /drinking areas. 49 50 Community Calendar — City Clerk Bartell asked Mayor Reinert to add the Board of 51 Appeals meeting to the calendar. The meeting will be held at 6:00 p.m., prior to the 52 regular city council meeting on April 12, 2010. The council requested that the County 53 Assessor be invited to attend the April work session to review the board process as well as 54 any valuation information that is available. 55 56 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 57 April 12, 2010. 58 59 60 61 62 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 63 2 _g7_ • • • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 City Council Meeting DRAFT March 22, 2010 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES : March 22, 2010 . 6:30 p.m. . 7:10 p.m. : Council Member Gallup, O'Donnell, Roeser, and Mayor Reinert : Council Member Rafferty Staff members present: Acting City Administrator Dan Tesch; City Attorney Joseph Langel; City Planner Paul Bengtson; City Planner Jeff Smyser; Police Captain Kent Strege; and City Clerk Julie Bartell The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Lino Lakes City Hall. PUBLIC COMMENT None. SETTING THE AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items lA through 1E. Council Member Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Rafferty absent. ITEM A. Consideration of Expenditures: i) March 22, 2010 (Check No. 87871 through 87946) in the amount of $1 50,719.34; ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 4209 through 4221) in the amount of $4,646.17 B. March 1, 2010 Council Work Session Minutes C. March 8, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes ACTION Approved Approved Approved Approved City Council Meeting 46 DRAFT March 22, 2010 47 D. Letter of support for Metro Transit Park and Ride 48 Grant Application (35E/Main Street) Approved 49 E. March 1, 2010 Closed Session Minutes Approved 50 51 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT. AL ROLEK 52 53 There was no report from the Finance Department. 54 55 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH 56 3A) Visitor's Bureau Appointment — Acting Administrator Tesch recalled that the city has 57 chosen to be a member of the new Minnesota Metro North Tourism group and is expected to 58 appoint a member to serve on the group's board of directors. Based on the group's bylaws that 59 require the city representative be a elected official, staff member or appointed board member, he is 60 recommending that city Economic Development Coordinator Mary Alice Divine be the 61 representative. 62 63 Council Member Gallup moved to approve the appointment of Mary Alice Divine as recommended.. 64 Council Member Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member 65 Rafferty absent. 66 67 3B) Labor Agreement — AFSCME Local 2454 — Acting Administrator Tesch reviewed the teims 68 of the proposed 2010 labor agreement, that includes no cost of living adjustment and 80 hours of 69 unpaid voluntary salary saving leave. The city agrees to reimburse any taken furlough time for a 70 member that is laid off during the year. 71 72 Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve the contract as presented. Council Member Roeser 73 seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Rafferty absent. 74 75 3C) Labor Agreement — Local 49 — Acting Administrator Tesch reviewed the terms of the 76 proposed 2010 labor agreement, including no cost of living adjustment, 80 hours of unpaid 77 voluntary salary saving leave, an increase in allowed accumulation of comp time, training language 78 and the addition of mediation to the dispute resolution process. The city agrees to reimburse any 79 taken furlough time for a member that is laid off during the year. 80 81 The mayor thanked unions for their consideration during these difficult economic times. 82 83 Council Member Gallup moved to approve the contract as presented. Council Member Roeser 84 seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Rafferty absent. 85 86 3D) Lease agreement with North Memorial Ambulance - Acting Administrator Tesch requested 87 that the item be postponed; language as been added to the proposed agreement that the city attorney 88 must review it. • • • City Council Meeting DRAFT March 22, 2010 89 90 Council Member O'Donnell moved to postpone the item to the April 12, 2010 meeting. Council 91 Member Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Rafferty 92 absent. 93 94 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCIIIA 95 96 There was no report from the Public Safety Department. 97 98 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER 99 100 There was no report from the Public Services Department. 101 102 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA 103 104 6A) Resolution No. 10 -26 denying a variance request to the zoning requirements for 105 accessory structure area and the number of accessory structures allowed on a rural property 106 — City Planner Bengtson explained that the applicant, Ms. Sandy Nordstrom, has requested a 107 variance to allow her to build an additional accessory structure (horse training facility) on her rural 108 property at 1288 Main Street. Since the property does not quality for an additional structure, the 109 applicant is asking consideration of the fact that the property includes a parcel of 17 acres of land 110 that is leased. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Board are recommending denial of the variance 111 request based on the findings included in the staff report. 112 The council noted that there was considerable discussion at the work session preceding this meeting 113 about this matter. While there is great interest in supporting an area busienss, there is concern about 114 setting a bad precedent if the variance were allowed. 115 Sandy Nordstrom, 1288 Main Street, addressed the council. She explained that she is in the 116 business of training horses and she would like the ability to cover the area she currently uses as a 117 training track so that it can be used year around. The business has become her sole occupation so 118 she needs to be able to operate as much as possible. The structure is portable and she'd be willing 119 to take it down if necessary. 120 The council explained to Ms. Nordstrom that they agonized over the question of denying this 121 variance. While they'd very much like to find a way to allow the structure, it would be very unwise 122 to set a precedent on the question of considering leased land.. 123 Council Member O'Donnell moved that the item be postponed to the meeting of April 12, 2010, 124 and that staff be directed to look for a different approach that would allow the requested structure 125 (without a variance). Council Member Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice 126 vote; Council Member Rafferty absent. 127 6B) First Reading of Ordinance No. 05 -10 amending a Planned Unit Development by 128 amending the Town Center Design & Development Guide Regarding Outdoor Dining /Seating 129 — City Planner Smyser explained that staff is presenting a change to the specific design guidelines 130 for the Town Center area that would mirror recent changes to the zoning regulations relative to 131 outdoor diningiseating requirements. 3 —1 0 0— City Council Meeting DRAFT March 22, 2010 132 Council Member Roeser moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 05 -10 as presented. 133 Council Member Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member 134 Rafferty absent. 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no Unfinished Business. NEW BUSINESS There was no New Business. COMMUNITY CALENDAR #. 44 0, IP 41. Wednesday, March 31 Monday, April 5 Monday, April 5 Thursday, April 8 Thursday, April 8 Monday April 12 Monday, April 12 March 23, 2010 through April 12, 2010 6:30 pm, Council Chambers 5:30 pm, Community Room 6:30 pm, Council Chambers 7:00 am, Community Room 6:30 pm, Community Room 6:00 pm, Council Chamber 6:30 pm, Council Chambers Environmental Board Council Work Session Park Board EDAC Charter Commission Bd of Appeal and Equalization City Council Meeting ADJOURN There being no further business, Council Member Gallup moved to adjourn at 7:10 p.m. Council Member Roeser seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Member Rafferty absent. These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting on April 12, 2010. Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Jeff Reinert, Mayor 4 —101— •