HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/23/2006 Council PacketAGENDA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MONDAY
JANUARY 23, 2006
6:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
2. Consideration of Minutes of November 14, 2005
3. Consideration of Annual Appointments
4. Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -01, amending the by -laws of the Economic
Development Authority
5. 2005 Summary of Activity
6. Adjourn
•
•
•
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES
DATE
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
OTHERS PRESENT
: November 14, 2005
: J. Bergeson, D. Carlson, C. Dahl, J. Reinert, D. Stoltz
: None
: Mary Divine, Gordon Heitke, Michael Grochala,
and Jean Viger
Meeting called to order by President Reinert at 6:04 p.m.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2005
EDA Member Carlson moved to approve the September 13, 2005 minutes, as presented. EDA
Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION
DONS UNDEROHE CONTRACT FOR
ENT NO. 05-03, APPRVING THE
AND RELEASE OF CERTAIN
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT WITH HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Ms. Divine summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
EDA Member Carlson asked for clarification that the City is releasing the Hartford Group and
transferring those conditions to the Country Inn & Suites Development Group without changing
builders. Economic Development Coordinator Divine replied that is correct.
President Reinert asked if exposure for the City remains the same. Economic Development
Coordinator Divine replied that is correct.
EDA Member Stoltz moved to adopt Resolution No. 05 -03, Approving the Assignment and
Release of Certain Obligations Under the Contract for Private Development with. Hartford
Group, Inc. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, EDA Member Dahl moved to adjourn. EDA Member Bergeson
seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 6:09 p.m.
Transcribed by:
Cheryl Felix
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
AGENDA ITEM 3
STAFF MEMBER Mary Alice Divine
DATE January 23, 2006
SUBJECT Annual Appointments
VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority
BACKGROUND
Each year the Economic Development Authority is required to make a number of
appointments at its annual meeting. The following is a list of appointments for your
consideration:
2005
2006 R
1. President
Jeff Reinert
(Council Prerogative)
2. Vice President
Caroline Dahl
(Council Prerogative)
3. Treasurer
Dan Stoltz
(Council Prerogative)
4. Secretary
Economic Development
Coordinator
Economic Development
Coordinator
5. Assistant Treasurer
Finance Director
Finance Director
6. Executive Director
City Administrator
City Administrator
7. Official Newspaper
Quad Community Press
Quad Community Press
8. Legal Depositories
Community National Bank
Wells Fargo
US Bank
Merrill Lynch
RBC Dain Rauscher
Wachovia Prudential
Securities
Patriot State Bank
LMC 4M Fund
Smith,Barney, Citi Group
Bank of the West
Others as needed
(Council prerogative)
RECOMMENDATION
• As recommended or council prerogative.
•
AGENDA ITEM 4
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine
DATE: 01/23/06
TOPIC: Resolution No. 06 -01 amending EDA by -laws
BACKGROUND:
When the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority was established in 1990,
a set of by -laws was adopted along with the enabling resolution establishing the
Authority.
The by -laws (attached) included organizational procedures as well as
established a time and date for annual and regular meetings.
Since the time the EDA was established, the EDA has not held an annual
meeting on that date, nor has it held regular monthly meetings. Instead, it has
met as needed to consider official business. The first meeting held each year is
considered its annual meeting when appointments are made. At least one
meeting has occurred each year since the EDA was established.
• This amendment to the by -laws is being recommended to bring them into
compliance with accepted practice. The amendment includes:
1. Holding an annual meeting on the fourth Monday in January of each year
so that is coincides with the same night the City Council meets. This
meeting will be held for election of officers for the year, and any other
business that comes before the Authority.
2. Holding meetings throughout the year only as needed, as has been
accepted practice, for the purpose of conducting necessary EDA
business.
OPTIONS:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 06 -01 amending the by -laws.
2. Deny Resolution No. 06 -01
3. Consider other alternatives to EDA meetings.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
•
•
•
•
LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTF �tC : )ITY
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -01
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE BY -LAWS OF THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the Lino Lakes
Economic Development Authority ( "Authority ") as follows:
WHEREAS, The Authority and its governing body, the Board, was established on June
11, 1990 under Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.090 to 469.108;
WHEREAS, The Authority adopted By -Laws of the Lino Lakes Economic Development
Authority ( "by- laws ") outlining organization and procedures for the Authority.
WHEREAS, Section 3.1 of the by -laws establish an annual meting of the Board to be
held on the third Monday of January of each year at 6:00 p.m.
WHEREAS, Section 3.2 of the by -laws establishes regular meetings of the Board to be
held on the third Monday of each month at 6:00 p.m.
WHEREAS, Section 3.3 of the by -laws establishes the procedure for special meetings of
the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes Economic Development
Authority as follows:
1. The annual meeting of the Board will be held at 6:00 p.m. on the fourth Monday of
January in each year before the regularly scheduled Lino Lakes City Council meeting.
2. The Board shall hold meetings in the manner described in Section 3.3 of the by -laws
for the purpose of official business of the Authority in lieu of regular monthly
meetings.
Approved by the Board of Commissioners of the Lino Lakes Economic Development
IIAuthority this 23`h day of January, 2006.
ATTEST:
Secretary
•
•
President
BY -LAWS OF THE LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
1. The Authority
Section 1.1. Name of the Authority. The name of the Authority shall be
the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (hereinafter, the "Authority "),
and its governing body shall be called the Board of Commissioners (hereinafter, the
"Board ").
Section 1.2. Office. The principal office of the Authority shall be at City
Hall, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota.
Section 1.3. Seal. The Authority shall have an official seal.
2. Organization
Section 2.1. Officers. The officers of the Authority shall consist of a
President, a Vice President, a Secretary, a Treasurer and an Assistant Treasurer.
The President, the Vice President, and the Treasurer shall be members of the Board
and shall identlat the samannually, ime and The offices of Secretary and Assistant s and
Treasurer
Vice Pres
need not be held by a Commissioner.
Section 2.2. President. The President shall preside at all meetings of the
Section 2.3. Vice President. The Vice President shall preside at any
meeting of the Board in the absence of the President and may exercise all powers
and perform all responsibilities of the President if the President cannot exercise or
perform the same due to absence or other inability.
Section 2.4. President Pro Tem. In the event of the absence or inability of
the President and the Vice President at any meeting, the Board may appoint any
remaining Commissioner as President Pro Tem to preside at such meeting.
Section 2.5. Treasurer. The Treasurer shall receive and be responsible for
Authority money, shall disburse authority money by check only, keep an account of
all Authority receipts and disbursements and the nature and purpose relating
thereto, shall file the Authority's financial statement with its secretary at least
once a year as set by the Authority, and be responsible for the acts of the assistant
treasurer.
Section 2.6. Afsthe Treasurer f er. The Assistnt Treasurer shall the Treasurer as abse t or disabled have all
the powers and duties of
2.7. Secretary. The Secretary shall keep or cause to be kept
minutes of all meetings of the Board and shall maintain or cause to be maintained
all records of the Authority. The Secretary shall also have such additional duties
Board.
•
•
•
and responsibilities as the Board may from time to time and by resolution
prescribe.
Section 2.8. Executive Director. The Executive Director shall be
designated from time to time by the Authority, shall be the chief appointed
executive officer of the Authority, and shall have such additional responsibilities
and authority as the Board may from time to time by resolution prescribe. The
Executive Director shall serve at the pleasure of the Board.
3. Procedures of Board of Commissioners
Section 3.1. Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of the Board shall be
held at (44 Ob p.m. on the t) 71f-N- of the month of
in each year.
Section 3 2. Regular Meetings. The Board shall hold regular meetings on
the fjp t 34r of each month, commencing at
o'clock p.m., C.T., or at other time as the Board may
determine.
Section 3.3. Special Meetings. Special meetings if the Board may be
called by the President or, in the event of the President's absence or inability, by
the Vice President at any time, upon three days prior notice to all Commissioners
and the Executive Director. Upon the same notice, special meetings of the Board
may also be called by any two Commissioners. The Executive Director shall post
notice of any special meeting in the principal office of the Authority no less than
three days prior to such special meeting.
Section 3.4. Quorum. A quorum . of the five member Board shall consist of
three Commissioners. In the absence of a quorum, no official action may be taken
by, on behalf of, or in the name of the Board or the Authority.
Section 3.5. Adoption of Resolutions. Resolutions of .the. Board shall be
deemed adopted if approved by not less than a simple majority of all
Commissioners present. Resolutions may but need not be read aloud prior to vote
taken thereon and may but need not be executed after passage.
Section 3.6. Rules of Order. The meetings of the Board shall be governed
by the most recent edition of Robert's Rules of Order.
4. Miscellaneous
Section 4.1. Fiscal Year. The fiscal year of the Authority shall be the
same as the City's fiscal year.
Section 4.2. Treasurer's Bond. The Treasurer shall give bond to the state
conditioned for the faithful discharge of official duties. The bond must be
approved as to form and surety by the Authority and filed with the Secretary and
2
•
•
•
11. There is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" a list of municipal development
districts created by the Council pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections
460.124 through 469.134 and tax increment districts created by the Council
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.174 through 469.179, or its
predecessors, the control, authority and operation of which are hereby
transferred to the EDA. The EDA shall accept the transfer of these
projects and districts and shall pledge to perform the terms, conditions and
covenants of all agreements outstanding with respect thereto.
12. There is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" a list of certain real estate located
within the above - described districts which the Council conveys to the EDA
by this resolution and by separate deed. Such property shall be accepted and
used by the EDA in accordance with the EDA Act.
13. There is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" a list of litigation currently pending
with respect to the districts transferred to the EDA pursuant to paragraph
11 and property transferred to the EDA pursuant to paragraph 12.
14. There is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" a list of funds and accounts
currently existing in the City which are hereby redesignated in the name of
the EDA and transferred to the ownership and control of the EDA to be used
in accordance with prior agreements and covenants of the Council and the
EDA Act.
15. There is attached hereto as Exhibit "E" a list of agreements respecting the
transferred districts and projects, the City's interests in which are hereby
assigned to the EDA and the terms, conditions and covenants of which shall
be performed by the EDA.
16. City officials and staff are hereby authorized and directed to execute such
deeds, assignments, requisitions, directives and agreements as may be
necessary and appropriate to carry out the terms, conditions and intensions
of this enabling resolution.
17. The EDA may request the City to levy a tax up to the maximum tax for the
benefit of the EDA as specifically set forth in Section 469.107 of the EDA
Act.
18. Nothing shall prevent the City from modifying this enabling resolution to
impose limits on the powers of the EDA or provide for other matters as
authorized in the EDA Act or other law.
19. This resolution shall become effective when the EDA holds its first meeting
and accepts the transfers herein described.
20. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the authority granted
to the EDA pursuant to paragraph 2 above shall not be exercised until the
EDA has established an advisory board which shall be comprised of all of the
members of the City's Economic Development Commission.
•
•
•
by which the. Authority may be bound shall be executed by the President and /or the
Executive Director or by such other Commissioners or Officers of the Authority as
the Board may by resolution prescribe.
Section 4.12. Amendment of By -Laws. These By -Laws may be amended by
the Board by majority vote of all the Commissioners, provided that any such
proposed amendment shall first have been delivered to each Commissioner at least
five days prior to the meeting at which such amendment is considered.
LN140 -12
4
AGENDA
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday,
January 23, 2006
Council Chambers
City Council Meeting
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
- Open Mike
- Call to Order and Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
1. Consent Agenda -
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) January 23, 2006 (Check No. 75751 through Pg 4 -16
75863 in the amount of $380,621;
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 15015- Pg 17
15026 in the amount of $14,067
B) Consider Resolution No. 05 -XX, Approval of Pg 18 -19
Application for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License
for Lino Lakes Lions Club
C) Consider Resolution 06 -06 Authorizing the Issuance Pg 20 -23
of 2006 Certificates of Indebtedness
D) Consider approval of January 9, 2006 City Council Pg 24 -29
Meeting Minutes
2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek
None
3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A) Promotion of Police Officer Kyle Leibel to Sergeant
B) Approval of 2006 City Council Meeting Schedule
Pg 30
C) Consider Employee Transfer from Administration to Pg 31
Community Development
4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
A) Approve request to renew contract with Otter Tail Pg 32 -36
Animal Control Center
5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
None
6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala
A) Public Hearing: Annual Storm Water Pollution Pg 37
Prevention Program, Jim Jacques (TKDA)
B) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -08, authorizing an Pg 38 -45
agreement with Anoka County for 2006 Residential
Recycling Program, Marty Asleson
C) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -10, Requesting Pg 46 -48
Speed Study for CSAH 23 (Lake Drive), Michael Grochala
D) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -09, approving the
planned unit development — final plan for the YMCA
at 725 Town Center Parkway, Paul Bengtson.
Pg 49 -61
E) Consideration of Resolution No. 05-153, Approving Pg 61 -87
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Village of
Hardwood Creek, Jeff Smyser
(Rescheduled from Council meeting of 1/9/06)
F) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -11, Revoking Pg 88 -90
Municipal State Aid Street Designation, Michael Grochala
7. Unfinished Business
Council Member O'Donnell not a Council Member for these meetings)
A) December 14, 2005 Council Work Session Minutes Pg 91 -95
B) December 19, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes Pg 96 -101
C) September 8, 2005 Special Council Work Session Pg 102 -105
Minutes
(Referred from City Council Meeting of January 9, 2005)
8. New Business
A) January 4, 2006 Council Work Session Minutes Pg 106 -112
Council Member Stoltz was absent
9. Community Calendar, January 24, 2006 through February 13, 2006:
A) Environmental Board Meeting, January 25, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
B) Economic Development Advisory Committee, February 2, 2006, 7:00 a.m.
C) Park Board Meeting, February 6, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
D) Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, February 8, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
E) City Council Meeting, Monday, February 13, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
10. Adjourn
- Open Mike
SUMMARY MINUTES
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday,
January 23, 2006
Council Chambers
City Council Meeting
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
THERE WERE NO SPEAKERS
- Call to Order and Roll Call (6:30 p.m. — Council Member Stoltz absent)
- Pledge of Allegiance
- Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
1. Consent Agenda -
A) Consideration of Expenditures:
i) January 23, 2006 (Check No. 75751 through
75863 in the amount of $380,621;
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 15015-
15026 15029 in the amount of $14,067 $28,480.37
B) Consider Resolution No. 06 -05, Approval of
Application for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License
for Lino Lakes Lions Club
Pg 4 -16
Pg 17
Pg 18 -19
C) Consider Resolution 06 -06 Authorizing the Issuance Pg 20 -23
of 2006 Certificates of Indebtedness
D) Consider approval of January 9, 2006 City Council Pg 24 -29
Meeting Minutes
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER O'DONNELL TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ WAS ABSENT
2. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek
None
3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch
A) Promotion of Police Officer Kyle Leibel to Sergeant
Pg 30
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER CARLSON TO APPROVE THE PROMOTION OF KYLE LEIBEL
AS RECOMMENDED.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ WAS ABSENT
B) Approval of 2006 City Council Meeting Schedule
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER O'DONNELL TO APPROVE THE MEETING SCHEDULE AS
PRESENTED.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ WAS ABSENT
C) Consider Employee Transfer from Administration to Pg 31
Community Development
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER O'DONNELL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT TO APPROVE THE EMPLOYEE TRANSFER AS
REQUESTED.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ WAS ABSENT
4. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia
A) Approve request to renew contract with Otter Tail Pg 32 -36
Animal Control Center
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER O'DONNELL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT TO APPROVE RENEWAL OF THE CONTRACT AS
REQUESTED.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ WAS ABSENT
5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner
None
6. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala
A) Public Hearing: Annual Storm Water Pollution Pg 37
Prevention Program, Jim Jacques (TKDA)
PUBLIC HEARING HELD; MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER O'DONNELL TO CLOSE HEARING.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ ABSENT.
B) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -08, authorizing an
agreement with Anoka County for 2006 Residential
Recycling Program, Marty Asleson
Pg 38 -45
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER O'DONNELL TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 06 -08 AS PRESENTED.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ ABSENT.
C) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -10, Requesting Pg 46 -48
Speed Study for CSAH 23 (Lake Drive), Michael Grochala
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER O'DONNELL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 06 -10 AS PRESENTED.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ ABSENT.
D) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -09, approving the
planned unit development — final plan for the YMCA
at 725 Town Center Parkway, Paul Bengtson.
Pg 49 -61
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER O'DONNELL, SECONDED BY MAYOR
BERGESON TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 06 -09 AS PRESENTED.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
E) Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -153, Approving
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Village of
Hardwood Creek, Jeff Smyser
(Rescheduled from Council meeting of 1/9/06)
Pg 61 -87
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER STOLTZ TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 05 -153, AS AMENDED
(AMENDED COPY AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CITY CLERK).
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON VOTED NO.
F) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -11, Revoking Pg 88 -90
Municipal State Aid Street Designation, Michael Grochala
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER O'DONNELL TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 06 -11 AS PRESENTED.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. Unfinished Business
Council Member O'Donnell not a Council Member for these meetings)
A) December 14, 2005 Council Work Session Minutes Pg 91 -95
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 14, 2005 MINUTES AS
PRESENTED (WITH CORRECTION FROM WORK SESSION).
MOTION PASSED. COUNCIL MEMBER O'DONNELL ABSTAINED FROM
VOTING.
B) December 19, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes Pg 96 -101
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CARLSON FOR A CORRECTION TO
THE MINUTES LOST FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION BY COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ TO
APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED LOST (2 -2 -1), CARLSON AND
BERGESON VOTING NO; O'DONNELL ABSTAINED FROM VOTING.
THE MINUTES WERE NOT APPROVED.
C) September 8, 2005 Special Council Work Session Pg 102 -105
Minutes
(Referred from City Council Meeting of January 9, 2005)
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT TO APPROVE THE MINUTES
AS ORIGINALLY PRESENTED; MOTION LOST FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER REINERT, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER STOLTZ TO TABLE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2005.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER O'DONNELL ABSTAINED FROM
VOTING.
8. New Business
A) January 4, 2006 Council Work Session Minutes Pg 106 -112
Council Member Stoltz was absent
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER O'DONNELL, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER REINERT TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 4, 2006 AS
PRESENTED.
MOTION PASSED; COUNCIL MEMBER STOLTZ ABSTAINED FROM
VOTING.
9. Community Calendar, January 24, 2006 through February 13, 2006:
A) Environmental Board Meeting, January 25, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
B) Economic Development Advisory Committee, February 2, 2006, 7:00 a.m.
C) Park Board Meeting, February 6, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
D) Planning & Zoning Board Meeting, February 8, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
E) City Council Meeting, Monday, February 13, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
10. Adjourn
•
EXPENDITURES
JANUARY 23, 2006
•
•
Date: 01/05/2006 Time: 09:03:28 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 5111 - 5111
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000489 TDS METROCOM 1 1,410.74 1,410.74 .00 .00
000604 RYLANDER, VERNON 1 76.97 76.97 .00 .00
003981 VARLAND DRYWALL, INC. 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
004660 URICH, TRACEY 1 2.97 2.97 .00 .00
004664 VESSCO, INC. 1 757.43 757.43 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 5 2,298.11 2,298.11 .00 .00*
•
•
Date: 01/05/2006 Time: 09:06:46 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (r) 5112 5112
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: s Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000134 BOLDT, ROBERT 1 27.98 27.98 .00 .00
001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 427.33 427.33 .00 .00
002694 AMERICAN MESSAGING 1 26.82 26.82 .00 .00
003986 MPCA 2 302.00 302.00 .00 .00
004660 URICH, TRACEY 1 26.77 26.77 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 6 810.90 810.90 .00 .00*
•
•
Date: 01/12/2006 Time: 14:58:47 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 5124 5124
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Options: Detail / Summary: S
Sort: N
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000057 PREMIUM WATERS, INC. 1 35.10 35.10 .00 .00
000065 SCHARBER & SONS, INC. 1 61.77 61.77 .00 .00
000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 2 1,283.48 1,283.48 .00 .00
000111 GLEWWE DOORS, INC. 1 473.00 473.00 .00 .00
000142 HAGERT, MELISSA 2 409.28 409.28 .00 .00
000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 1,212.00 1,212.00 .00 .00
000174 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1,725.30 1,725.30 .00 .00
000177 MAIN FLORAL LTD, INC. 1 33.55 33.55 .00 .00
000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 2 370.78 370.78 .00 .00
000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 135.00 135.00 .00 .00
000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 163.96 163.96 .00 .00
09 ROLEK, ALAN 1 682.53 682.53 .00 .00
4 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 1 1,438.76 1,438.76 .00 .00
000370 CENTRAL COMMUINICATIONS 3 1,953.89 1,953.89 .00 .00
000465 MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTECH GROUP 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00
000492 KRISS DESIGN COMPANY, LLC 1 650.00 650.00 .00 .00
000540 AUTO- MEDICS, INC. 1 159.75 159.75 .00 .00
000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 4 1,151.11 1,151.11 .00 .00
000685 BILL'S GUN SHOP /RANGE -BJAM, INC. 2 392.44 392.44 .00 .00
000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 288.00 288.00 .00 .00
000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 89.20 89.20 .00 .00
000810 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 1 1,219.79 1,219.79 .00 .00
Date: 01/12/2006 Time: 14:58:47 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
08 JOHNSON, RICK /DEER & BEAVER, INC. 1 180.00 180.00 .00 .00
000900 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 1 392.46 392.46 .00 .00
000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 10,194.30 10,194.30 .00 .00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 130.30 130.30 .00 .00
000970 VERIZON WIRELESS 1 114.44 114.44 .00 .00
001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 2,944.59 2,944.59 .00 .00
001260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 1 704.50 704.50 .00 .00
001267 FAST BREAK CORNER MARKET, INC. 1 9.58 9.58 .00 .00
001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 1 3,852.75 3,852.75 .00 .00
001298 DEGARDNER, RICK 1 29.10 29.10 .00 .00
001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 3 6,507.25 6,507.25 .00 .00
001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 2 159.19 159.19 .00 .00
001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 78.23 78.23 .00 .00
001620 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 1 75.12 75.12 .00 .00
001680 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC. 1 149.85 149.85 .00 .00
001859 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1 232.01 232.01 .00 .00
60 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 562.60 582.60 .00 .00
4 KLUEGEL, PETER 1 104.91 104.91 .00 .00
002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 5,742.00 5,742.00 .00 .00
002836 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 1 4,103.99 4,103.99 .00 .00
003090 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 1,568.69 1,568.69 .00 .00
003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 2 1,133.45 1,133.45 .00 .00
003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 1 687.04 687.04 .00 .00
003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 5,687.40 5,687.40 .00 .00
003271 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1 63.85 63.85 .00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 3 117.30 117.30 .00 .00
003624 ENCOMM MIDWEST, INC. 1 47,064.80 47,064.80 .00 .00
•
Date: 01/12/2006 Time: 14:58:47 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 3
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
111/17 PRAIRIE MOON NURSERY, INC. 1 2,904.62 2,904.62 .00 .00
003789 RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 2,220.50 2,220.50 .00 .00
003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 70.93 70.93 .00 .00
003986 FINGERPRINT EQUIPMENT LABS, INC. 1 215.87 215.87 .00 .00
003990 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF 1 2,297.18 2,297.18 .00 .00
004000 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 1 44.20 44.20 .00 .00
004008 PREMIER RINKS, INC. 1 2,875.50 2,875.50 .00 .00
004009 PEAK STAFFING 2 979.60 979.60 .00 .00
004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 508.40 508.40 .00 .00
004172 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 390.00 390.00 .00 .00
004232 A & J PROPERTIES LLC 1 6,250.00 6,250.00 .00 .00
004370 TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC 1 450.00 450.00 .00 .00
004416 THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES 1 375.00 375.00 .00 .00
004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 502.50 502.50 .00 .00
004560 U S BANK 1 1,555.27 1,555.27 .00 .00
004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 1 244.80 244.80 .00 .00
4118 POGALZ, BRIAN 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
8 SPRINT 1 204.42 204.42 .00 .00
005015 METRO NORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
006304 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS, INC. 1 2,908.52 2,908.52 .00 .00
900457 TRANS UNION CORPORATION 1 12.31 12.31 .00 .00
900523 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. 1 330.00 330.00 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 89 132,065.01 132,065.01 .00 .00*
•
Date: 01/12/2006 Time: 15:06:43 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 5125 5125
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 366.67 366.67 .00 .00
000097 DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING, INC. 1 11,820.43 11,820.43 .00 .00
000293 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 3 616.42 616.42 .00 .00
000300 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION 1 263.00 263.00 .00 .00
000347 MULTICARE ASSOCIATES 1 346.00 346.00 .00 .00
000370 CENTRAL COMMUINICATIONS 1 5.57 5.57 .00 .00
000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #5 1 718.07 718.07 .D0 .00
000424 ANOKA COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC 1 10.00 10.00 .D0 .00
000720 BLAINE, CITY OF 1 7.36 7.36 .00 .00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 3 324.84 324.84 .00 .00
001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 120,381.50 120,381.50 .00 .00
41/ir CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 41.70 41.70 .00 .00
HENNEPIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
001278 DNR WATERS 1 6,623.50 6,623.50 .00 .00
001455 FBI NORTHWEST CHAPTER /FBINAA 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00
001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 67.31 67.31 .00 .00
001955 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF CHIEF OF POL 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00
002178 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 526.78 526.78 .00 .00
002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 777.00 777.00 .00 .00
002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 44,762.70 44,762.70 .00 .00
002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 2 10,978.30 10,978.30 .00 .00
002786 MINNESOTA CRIME PREVENTION ASSOCIATION 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00
•
Date: 01/12/2006 Time: 15:06:43 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 2
Vendor # Name Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
1111160
002931
003050
003123
003880
003968
004063
004064
004065
004102
004127
004240
004306
004370
005022
900344
•
MID- STATES ORGANIZED CRIME 1 150.00 150.00
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 246.42 246.42
MRPA 1 30.00 30.00
NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 422.55 422.55
SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 1 36,654.06 36,654.06
2005 MN JUVENILE OFFICERS CONFERENCE 1 195.00 195.00
ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE BUREAU 3 690.50 690.50
LAND & WATER MAGAZINE 1 50.00 50.00
MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE 1 30.00 30.00
WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMAN RESOURCES 1 150.00 150.00
WEGENER, WAYNE, JR. 1 175.00 175.00
STREICHER'S, INC. 1 170.29 170.29
CHISAGO COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 1 100.00 100.00
TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC 1 2,416.01 2,416.01
PITNEY WORKS RESERVE ACCOUNT 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS 1 80.00 80.00
Grand Totals: 45 245,446.98 245,446.98
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00*
Date: 01/12/2006 Time: 15:20:10 Operator: JAL
•es:
Options:
Page: 1
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Fund:
Dept Id:
Program:
Vendor #:
Invoice #:
Schedule Journal #:
Bank #:
Cash #:
Payroll Check Dates:
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(R)
(A)
(A)
(A)
Print: D
Report Format: 1
# of copies: 1
Total By Account: Y
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
0
0
0
75760
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75758
•
0
5113 5129
Sort: D
Print Ranges /Options: Y
Process Payroll: N
Page on Sort: N
Description
A & J PROPERTIES LLC
AFSCME COUNCIL #5
ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE B
M ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE B
BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC.
KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN
LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR
METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT
MINNESOTA STATE TREASU
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYME
PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN
SHOREVIEW, CITY OF
VARLAND DRYWALL, INC.
O BLAINE, CITY OF
•
REIMBURSE SECURITY /ANGIE
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
LICENSE TABS
LICENSE TABS
TOW HYUNDAI /SONATA '02
LEGACY
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING
DEC SAC
SURCHARGE /OCT, NOV, DEC
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING /TERR
TIMBERWOLF TRAIL
UTILITY BILLING
REIMBURSE CONTRACTOR LIC
Total for Dept **
Amount
PROGRAM REC /BINGO ADULT IN
Total for Dept 201
BLAINE, CITY OF PROGRAM REC /CRAFT & SNAC SPECIAL
Total for Dept 205
O MAIN FLORAL LTD, INC. ARRANGEMENT /GILBERTSON
O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC DEC 19 /CITY COUNCIL
O U S BANK REGISTRATION
Total for Dept 401
0 ACCLAIM BENEFITS
0 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN,
O HENNEPIN COUNTY GOVERN
O METRO NORTH CHAMBER OF
O PREMIUM WATERS, INC.
O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN
O SPRINT
0 STAR TRIBUNE, INC.
0 U S BANK
0 WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMA
FLEXIBLE SPENDING /DEC
PROF SERVICES
REGISTRATION /DAN T
MEETING /GORDON H
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER
ORDINANCE 13 -5
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER
ADVERTISING /BLDG PERMIT
REGISTRATION
MEMBERSHIP /DAN T
MAYOR /CO
MAYOR /CO
MAYOR /CO
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
6,250.00
718.07
59.00
59.00
89.20
582.60
777.00
5,742.00
4,103.99
246.42
20.70
9.10
50.00
18,707.08*
288.00
288.00*
7.36
7.36*
33.55
139.75
414.91
588.21*
704.50
1,212.00
50.00
25.00
35.10
69.00
204.42
508.40
246.61
150.00
Date: 01/12/2006 Time: 15:20:10 Operator: JAL
Page: 2
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept Amount
Total for Dept 402
75756 TDS METROCOM MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER SENIORS
Total for Dept 406
•
0 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT F RENEWAL /AL R & PAULA S FINANCE
0 ROLEK, ALAN REIMBURSE MILEAGE /MEALS/ FINANCE
Total for Dept 407
0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY
Total for Dept 414
0 METRO NORTH CHAMBER OF MEETING /GORDON H
Total for Dept 415
0 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, L CARLSON CONSERVATION PRO
0 POGALZ, BRIAN REISSUE QUARTERLY STIPEN
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC DEC 14 /PLANNING & ZONING
Total for Dept 416
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75756
0
0
0
0
0
2005 MN JUVENILE OFFIC
AID ELECTRIC SERVICE,
ANOKA COUNTY CHIEFS OF
ASPEN MILLS, INC.
BILL'S GUN SHOP /RANGE-
C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
CENTRAL COMMUINICATION
CHISAGO COUNTY EMERGEN
CONNEXUS ENERGY
FAST BREAK CORNER MARK
FBI NORTHWEST CHAPTER/
FINGERPRINT EQUIPMENT
HAGERT, MELISSA
INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF
KRISS DESIGN COMPANY,
METRO SALES INCORPORAT
MID- STATES ORGANIZED C
MINNESOTA CRIME PREVEN
MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTEC
MULTICARE ASSOCIATES
SHRED -IT, INC.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
STREICHER'S, INC.
TDS METROCOM
THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATE
TRANS UNION CORPORATIO
U S BANK
VERIZON WIRELESS
WEGENER, WAYNE, JR.
REGISTRATION /MELINDA B
MAINTENANCE SIRENS /NOV &
MEMBERSHIP /DAVE P
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
RANGE /TARGETS
CALENDAR /PAPER /FORMS /PEN
INTERNET /NOVEMBER
MEMBERSHIP /DAVE P
MONTHLY SERVICE
CAR WASHES /2
DUES /DAVE P
EVIDENCE & PROPERTY TAGS
REIMBURSE HOLSTER
MEMBERSHIP /DAVE P
500 CARD /ENVELOPES
COPIER
MEMBERSHIP /DAVE P
MEMBERSHIP /KAREN A
NOVEMBER USAGE
EXAM /TANYA TAMM
DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT
CONNECT CHARGES /DECEMBER
FUSEE /30 MINUTE WITH SPI
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER
PERSONNEL EVALUATION /TAN
CREDIT SUMMARY /EMPLOYMEN
REGISTRATION
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER
REIMBURSE AMMUNITION
Total for Dept 420
3,205.03*
36.51
36.51*
80.00
682.53
762.53*
LEGAL CO 10,194.30
10,194.30*
ECONOMIC 25.00
25.00*
PLANNING 1,219.79
PLANNING 100.00
PLANNING 223.00
1,542.79*
POLICE 195.00
POLICE 898.32
POLICE 10.00
POLICE 1,151.11
POLICE 392.44
POLICE 130.30
POLICE 1,959.46
POLICE 100.00
POLICE 21.31
POLICE 9.58
POLICE 60.00
POLICE 215.87
POLICE 409.28
POLICE 100.00
POLICE 650.00
POLICE 10,978.30
POLICE 150.00
POLICE 40.00
POLICE 37.00
POLICE 346.00
POLICE 70.93
POLICE 390.00
POLICE 170.29
POLICE 748.43
POLICE 375.00
POLICE 12.31
POLICE 148.51
POLICE 114.44
POLICE 175.00
20,058.88*
-13-
Date: 01/12/2006 Time: 15:20:10 Operator: JAL
Page: 3
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
fill k # Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept
Amount
0 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI SHARED BUDGET
Total for Dept 421
0
0
0
75755
0
0
75751
75752
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75756
0
•
•
FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
KLUEGEL, PETER
PEAK STAFFING
RYLANDER, VERNON
TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC
U S BANK
AMERICAN MESSAGING
BOLDT, ROBERT
CONNEXUS ENERGY
EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV
JOHNSON, RICK /DEER & B
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS,
PREMIER RINKS, INC.
RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPAN
TDS METROCOM
U S BANK
FIRE
FILTERS /TAPE /FLASHLITE /L BUILDING
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW BUILDING
ALISSA MILLER BUILDING
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW BUILDING
TYPES BUILDING
BUILDING
PLANNING FEES /CASE
REGISTRATION
Total for Dept 422
MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY
REIMBURSE CLOTHING
MONTHLY SERVICE
STREET SIGNS
HARDWARE
DEER CALLS /2
HAZARD MARKER
TULFEX MATS
REPAIR STREET LITES /SPRI
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER
REGISTRATION
Total for Dept 430
STREETS
ALLOW STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
0 ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE B VEHICLE FEES
0 AUTO- MEDICS, INC. TOW /WHITE FORD F -150 '02
O DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. GASOHOL
O FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO SPARK PLUGS /BATTERY /ALTE
O FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. CORE DEPOSIT
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE FILTERS /TAPE /FLASHLITE /L
O HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV HARDWARE
O O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, I FILTERS /LITE /GREASE /HALO
0 SCHARBER & SONS, INC. OIL FILTER /OIL
O U S BANK REGISTRATION
Total for Dept 431
O ACE SOLID WASTE, INC.
O AID ELECTRIC SERVICE,
O AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR
O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
0 CONNEXUS ENERGY
O DEEP ROCK WATER COMPAN
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
O GLEWWE DOORS, INC.
0 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV
O NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT
0 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATI
O PITNEY WORKS RESERVE A
0 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
0 TBS OFFICE AUTOMATIONS
MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY
ADD RECEPTACLE /ROUGH -IN
MAT RENTAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICE
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER
FILTERS /TAPE /FLASHLITE /L
REPLACE PUSH BUTTON LOCK
HARDWARE
ANNUAL INSPECTION
REPAIR BOILER /DEC
POSTAGE ESCROW
TIME CARDS
COPIER
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
120,381.50
120,381.50*
29.77
104.91
979.60
76.97
2,866.01
60.00
4,117.26*
8.94
27.98
806.19
6,507.25
14.80
180.00
1,133.45
2,875.50
1,226.00
115.07
65.00
12,960.18*
572.50
159.75
3,852.75
687.04
159.19
3.60
19.47
392.46
61.77
47.51
5,956.04*
366.67
385.16
163.96
324.84
881.03
75.12
14.94
473.00
10.61
1,568.69
617.80
5,000.00
44.20
2,908.52
Date: 01/12/2006 Time 15:20:10 Operator: JAL
75756
0
0
0
Page: 4
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Vendor Alpha Name
Description Dept
TDS METROCOM
U S BANK
WIPERS AND WIPES,
XCEL ENERGY
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER GOVERNME
REGISTRATION GOVERNME
INC. URINAL SCREEN GOVERNME
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER GOVERNME
Total for Dept 432
0 STAMPS PARKS
O MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS
O MILEAGE /DECEMBER PARKS
O FILTERS /TAPE /FLASHLITE /L PARKS
O REIMBURSE PARKING /MEALS PARKS
O HARDWARE PARKS
0 ABRASIVE /AUTOLOCK /RATCHE PARKS
0 MEMBERSHIP /MMIKE H PARKS
0 PORTABLE REST ROOMS PARKS
0 SEEDS PARKS
75756 MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER PARKS
0 REGISTRATION PARKS
75757 REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW PARKS
Total for Dept 450
CIRCLE PINES POST OFFS
CONNEXUS ENERGY
DEGARDNER, RICK
FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
HOFFMAN, MICHAEL
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV
HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTION
MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF A
NATURE CALLS, INC.
PRAIRIE MOON NURSERY,
TDS METROCOM
U S BANK
URICH, TRACEY
•
75751
0
75750
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75756
75759
0
O MRPA MEETING & LUNCH /BRIAN H RECREATI
Total for Dept 451
O LAND & WATER MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION /TIM P ENVIRONM
O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC DEC 14 /ENVIRONMENTAL BOA ENVIRONM
O U S BANK REGISTRATION ENVIRONM
Total for Dept 461
O U S BANK REGISTRATION
Total for Dept 462
AMERICAN MESSAGING
AMERICAN WATER WORKS A
M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI
CONNEXUS ENERGY
DNR WATERS
INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH,
NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I
NORTHERN AIR CORPORATI
ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC
SHOREVIEW, CITY OF
TDS METROCOM
VESSCO, INC.
XCEL ENERGY
75751 AMERICAN MESSAGING
75750 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFS
0 CONNEXUS ENERGY
•
MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY
DUES /2 -1 -06 - 1 -31 -07
UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE
MONTHLY SERVICE
APPROPRIATION FEE
WATER SAMPLES /DEC
DUAL PORT /MOUNTING BRACK
REPAIR BOILER /DEC
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER
UTILITY BILLING
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER
RECEIVER MODULE
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER
Total for Dept 494
MONTHLY SERVICE /JANUARY
UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE
MONTHLY SERVICE
SOLID WA
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER -
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
-15-
Amount
363.15
32.73
987.20
3,953.50
18,171.12*
41.70
42.60
29.10
27.58
67.31
187.13
63.85
30.00
422.55
2,904.62
41.51
325.00
29.74
4,212.69*
30.00
30.00*
50.00
139.75
65.00
254.75*
150.00
150.00*
13.41
263.00
213.67
947.35
6,623.50
135.00
244.80
820.96
74.93
1,560.77
106.07
757.43
1,733.90
13,494.79*
4.47
213.66
246.11
Date: 01/12/2006 Time: 15:20:10 Operator: JAL
Page: 5
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Vendor Alpha Name Description
Dept
Amount
0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT
75753 MPCA
75754 MPCA
0 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, I
0 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC
0 RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPAN
0 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF
0 W. W. GOETSCH ASSOCIAT IMPELLER
Total for Dept
•
•
FILTERS /TAPE /FLASHLITE /L SEWER
SEWER - JANUARY SEWER
CONFERENCE /JEFF F SEWER
CERTIFICATION TEST /JEFF SEWER
PUMP SEPTIC TANK /7525 4T SEWER
MONTHLY SERVICE /DECEMBER SEWER
REPAIR STREET LITES /SPRI
UTILITY BILLING
0 DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTI
0 ENCOMM MIDWEST, INC.
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN
0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK
0 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SER
495
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
CONTRACTOR /MARSHAN LANE OTHER
CONTRACTOR /WELL #5 OTHER
PUBLIC NOTICE /STORM WATE OTHER
35W /LAKE DRIVE OTHER
ACQUISITION /RELOCATION S OTHER
Total for Dept 499
2.34
44,762.70
270.00
32.00
330.00
74.92
994.50
727.31
1,725.30
49,383.31*
11,820.43
47,064.80
27.60
36,654.06
526.78
96,093.67*
Grand Total 380,621.00*
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
1/13/2006
•
The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval:
DATE CHECK# NAME
1/13/2006 15015
1/13/2006 15016
1/13/2006 15017
1/13/2006 15018
1/13/2006 15019
1/13/2006 15020
1/13/2006 15021
1/13/2006 15022
1/13/2006 15023
1/13/2006 15024
1/13/2006 15025
1/13/2006 15026
•
•
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension
Cameron Haapoja
Centennial Firefighters Relief Association
City of Lino Lakes
Frattalone's Hardware
Janet Haapoja
MN Chapter IAAI /Jeffrey G. Schadegg
MN Dept of Labor and Industry
Qwest
Red Rooster Auto Stores
Viking Office Products'
Xcel Energy
Total
1 of 1
-17-
ACCOUNT
42220 - Travel, Conf., Schools
42280 - Miscellaneous Expense
43010 - Relief Association
43030 - Common Area Change
42110 - Other Maintenance
42180 - Office Supplies Expense
42220 - Travel, Conf., Schools
42110 - Other Maintenance
42240 - Telephone
42130 - Equipment Expense
42180 - Office Supplies Expense
42254 - Station 2 - Electric
AMOUNT
240.00
316.10
6,000.00
5,004.25
265.33
41.00
940.00
10.00
214.28
147.73
251.91
636.60
14, 067.20
STAFF ORIGNINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED:
AGENDA ITEM 1B
Jean Viger, Deputy Clerk
January 23, 2006
Consider Resolution No. 06 -05, Approving
Application for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License
for Lino Lakes Lions Club
Simple Majority (3/5 Vote)
BACKGROUND:
The Lino Lakes Lions Club has scheduled its annual prime rib dinner for Saturday, March 4,
2006 to be held at St. Joseph Catholic Church, 171 Elm Street. The Lino Lakes Lions Club is
requesting approval of a 1 to 4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License application. The license
is necessary to allow the Lions Club to mix and dispense liquor that will be served as part of the
dinner.
The applicant is required to submit an application to the city, for approval, at least 30 days prior
to the event and City policy requires a background investigation on the CEO each time a permit
or license application is received. The Lino Lakes Police Department has completed the
background check and has found no reason to deny the license.
A copy of the application, a copy of the certificate of liquor liability insurance and the results of
the background check are on file in the city clerk's office.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Resolution No. 06 -05, application for the 1 to 4 day temporary on -sale liquor
license.
2. Deny Resolution No. 06 -05
RECOMMENDATIONS.
1. Approve Resolution No. 06 -05
•
-18-
•
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -05
APPROVING LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB APPLICATION FOR A
1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute, Section 340, allows the city council to issue a
temporary on -sale liquor license to a non - profit organization in connection with a social
event sponsored by the licensee and held within the city limits; and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lions Club has submitted an application to hold a
fundraising event at St. Joseph Catholic Church, 171 Elm Street, on March 4, 2006; and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Lions Club has paid the required fee, and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has conducted an investigation of the Lino Lakes
Lions Club, and
WHEREAS, the Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Division requires the application be
approved by the City of Lino Lakes City Council before submitting for approval to the
liquor control board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby
approves the request of the Lino Lakes Lions Club for a temporary on -sale liquor license.
ATTEST:
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of January, 2006
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 1 C
STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek
MEETING DATE January 23, 2006
TOPIC Consider Resolution 06 -06 Authorizing the Issuance of the 2006
Certificates of Indebtedness
VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority (3/5)
BACKGROUND
The 2006 budget called for the issuance of Certificates of Indebtedness in the amount of
$307,000 to be used for the purchase of capital equipment as part of our equipment
replacement program.
The Area and Unit Fund has sufficient reserves to issue a loan to finance these purchases.
A Special Levy will pay for this certificate in 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the levy proceeds will be
credited to the Area and Unit Fund.
The equipment to be funded with the 2006 Certificate of Indebtedness is listed on the attached
schedule.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Resolution 06 -06 issuing the 2006 Certificates of Indebtedness
2. Return to staff for further review
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1.
Council member
•
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -06
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
2006 CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS
WHEREAS, the 2006 budget calls for the issuance of certificates amounting to $307,000.00 and
WHEREAS, the Area and Unit Fund (406) has sufficient reserves to issue a loan, and
WHEREAS, a special levy will pay for these certificates in 2007, 2008 and 2009.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES:
1. It is hereby found and determined that it is necessary and expedient for the City to issue a
Certificate of Indebtedness for the purpose of financing the purchase of capital equipment, in accordance
with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301; and that the sale of said Certificates to the
Capital Equipment Revolving Fund (402), on terms hereinafter set forth, is hereby ordered.
2. The City shall issue a Certificate of Indebtedness in the amount of $307,000.00 authorized by
the City Council pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301; for the purpose of
financing the purchase of capital equipment. Said Certificate shall be dated on February 1, 2006 and
shall be payable to the Area and Unit Fund of the City of Lino Lakes.
3. Said Certificate shall be as follows:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
2006 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBTEDNESS
Know All Men By These Presents that the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, hereby
acknowledge the Capital Improvement Project Fund to be indebted and for values received promises to
pay the Area and Unit Fund of the City of lino Lakes, the sum of $307,000 plus interest at 4% per annum
in three installments in 2007, 2008 and 2009 per attached schedule.
This Certificate is issued for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for the City and is
authorized by a duly adopted resolution of the City Council of Lino Lakes, dated January 23rd, 2006 and
is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.301, and is to be
effective as of February 1, 2006.
It is Hereby Certified and Recited, that all acts, conditions and things required by law to be done, to exist,
to happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Certificate have been done, do
exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due form, time and manner; that a direct,
annual, irrepealable ad valorem tax will be duly levied by said City in an amount sufficient to pay the
principal and interest on this Certificate, together with all other existing indebtedness of the said City,
does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation on indebtedness.
•
Page 2
•
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, CityC1erk
Adopted bythe City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, this 23rd day of January, 2006.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The fotiowing voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
Page 3
•
December 31, 2007
December 31, 2008
December 31, 2009
Total
Interest Rate - 4%
Levy 2006 Payable 2007
Levy 2007 Payable 2008
Levy 2008 Payable 2009
SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS
2006 CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS
FEBRUARY 1, 2006
PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL
$ 90,000.00 $ 26,479.00 $ 116,479.00
107,000.00 9,765.00 116,765.00
110,000.00 4,950.00 114, 950.00
$ 307,000.00 $ 41,194.00 $ 348,194.00
$122,303.00 (includes 5% overlevy)
122,603.00
120,698.00
Total $365,604.00
•
•
ifti,octOtA I; Li
City of Lino Lakes
2006 Capital Equipment Replacement
,A 1
Department Description Amount
Police (5) Squad Cars & Equipment $127,000
Office Copier 17,583
144,583
Fire Capital Equipment 68,900
Fleet
•
•
Single Axle Dump Truck w/ Plow $133,000
Bobcat 5600 Toolcat with attchmts $55,000
1 Ton Pickup w/ Plow $40,000
1/2 Ton Pickup with Plow $30,000
Toro Groundsmaster $26,000
Passenger Van $25,500
1/2 Ton Pickup $23,500
Total Fleet 333,000
Total $546,483
Equipment Levy 216,670
Capital Improvement Fund 22,813
Certificates to be Issued $307,000
G -2
Le'
DRAFT
1 CITY OF LINO LAKES
2 MINUTES
3
5 DATE : January 9, 2006
6 TIME STARTED : 6 :33 P.M.
7 TIME ENDED : 7:15 P.M.
8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmembers Carlson, O'Donnell, Reinert, Stoltz
9 and Mayor Bergeson
10 MEMBERS ABSENT : None
11
12 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Community Development Director,
13 Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; Police Chief, Dave Pecchia (part); and City
14 Attorney, Bill Hawkins.
15
16 OPEN MIKE
17
18 Jerry Fagerland, 181 Egret Lane, stated in mid- November his guest received a ticket for parking on a
19 residential street during the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. He asked Council if the early -hour
20 parking City ordinance could be revisited. Mayor Bergeson replied currently, there are no plans to
21 revisit the ordinance. He added residents should inform the police if they have guests.
22
23 Councilmember Stoltz suggested a summary of the policy be included in the next newsletter
24
25 Police Chief Pecchia stated he had suggested a summary ordinance article be put in the newsletter.
26
27 Councilmember Reinert requested an ordinance update at a future work session. Police Chief Pecchia
28 replied he would provide an update.
29
30 Mayor Bergeson, Councilmember Reinert, and Councilmember O'Donnell took the Oath of Office,
31 given by City Attorney Hawkins.
32
33 SETTING THE AGENDA
34
35 Mayor Bergeson stated item 6B has been removed.
36
37 The agenda was accepted as amended.
38
39 CONSENT AGENDA
40
41 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember O'Donnell
42 seconded the motion.
43
44 Motion carried unanimously.
45
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 9, 2006
DRAFT
46 ITEM ACTION
47
48 A. CONSIDERATION OF EXPENDITURES:
49
50 i) January 9, 2006 (Check No. 75603 —
51 75749, $1,125,144.18) Approved
52
53 ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14997 —
54 15014,$15,601.82) Approved
55
56 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK
57
58 There was none.
59
60 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH
61
62 A. Consideration of Annual Appointments
63
64 City Administrator Heitke summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
65
66 Mayor Bergeson asked if Council would like to skip having each item read, and hearing no
67 opposition, moved forward.
68
69 Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the annual appointments. Councilmember Stoltz
70 seconded the motion.
71
72 Motion carried unanimously.
73
74 B. Consideration of Hiring Curt Boehme for Police Officer
75
76 City Administrator Heitke summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
77
78 Councilmember O'Donnell moved to approve hiring Curt Boehme for police officer. Councilmember
79 Reinert seconded the motion.
80
81 Motion carried unanimously.
82
83 C. Consideration of Hiring William Owens for Police Officer
84
85 City Administrator Heitke summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
86
87 Councilmember Carlson moved to approve hiring William Owens for police officer. Councilmember
88 Reinert seconded the motion.
89
90 Motion carried unanimously.
2
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 9, 2006
DRAFT
91
92 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA
93
A There was none.
95
96 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER
97
98 There was none.
99
100 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA
101
102 A. Consideration SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 14 -05, Vacating Drainage and
103 Utility Easement and Accepting Replacement Easement, Lot 1 Block 2, Pheasant Hills
104 Preserve 9th Addition, Jeff Smyser
105
106 Community Development Director Grochala summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff
107 recommends approval.
108
109 Motion carried. Councilmember Carlson voted yea. Councilmember O'Donnell voted yea.
110 Councilmember Reinert voted yea. Councilmember Stoltz voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea.
111
112 Ordinance No. 14 -05 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
113
114
115
116
117 Councilmember Carlson stated this item was removed late this afternoon but some residents are here
118 to speak on the issue, and since open mike is prior to changes to the agenda, she asked for a legal
119 opinion. City Attorney Hawkins replied residents will be given an opportunity to comment on the
120 issue when it is presented, which satisfies legal requirements.
.21
122 Mayor Bergeson commented this item might come back with different details.
123
124 C. Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -0i, Authorizing Contract with Markhurd,
125 Photogrammetric Mapping Services, Michael Grochala
126
127 Community Development Director Grochala summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff
128 recommends approval.
129
130 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 06 -01, Authorizing Contract with Markhurd,
131 Photogrammetric Mapping Services. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion.
132
133 Motion carried unanimously.
134
135 Resolution No. 06 -01 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
. - . • • . . . • . . •. . .. • . . • a . • -• . . o • .
3
-26-
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 9, 2006
DRAFT
136
137 D. Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -02, Authorizing Storm Water Utility Feasibility
138 Study, Michael Grochala
139
140 Community Development Director Grochala summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff
141 recommends approval.
142
143 Councilmember O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 06 -02, Authorizing Storm Water Utility
144 Feasibility Study. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion.
145
146 Councilmember Carlson stated she will vote against this because she is not sold on a new tax.
147
148 Councilmember Reinert stated this is only a feasibility study to get more information.
149
150 Moti on carried 4 -1. Carlson nay.
151
152 Resolution No. 06 -02 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
153
154 E. Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -03, Approving Change Order No. 1 and Final
155 Payment, Marshan Lane Utility Improvement, Jim Studenski
156
157 City Engineer Studensld summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
158
159 Councilmember Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 06 -03, Approving Change Order No. 1 and
160 Final Payment, Marshan Lane Utility Improvement. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the
161 motion.
162
163 Motion carried unanimously.
164
165 Resolution No. 06 -03 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
166
167 F. Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -04, Receiving Quotes and Awarding Contract, 2006
168 Ditch and Pond Cleaning Project, Jim Studenski
169
170 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
171
172 Councilmember Stoltz moved to adopt Resolution No. 06 -04, Receiving Quotes and Awarding
173 Contract, 2006 Ditch and Pond Cleaning Project. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion.
174
175 Motion carried unanimously.
176
177 Resolution No. 06 -04 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
178
179 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
180
4
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 9, 2006
DRAFT
181 There was none,
182
183 NEW BUSINESS
84
185 Mayor Bergeson stated items A through F were not on the consent agenda because Councilmember
186 O'Donnell was not on the Council. He asked if there were any objections to considering items A
187 through F together. Councilmember Carlson replied she would like items D, E, and F separate.
188
189 A. Consideration of Minutes of December 7, 2005 Council Work Session (Councilmember
190 O'Donnell was not on the Council)
191
192 B. Consideration of Minutes of December 12, 2005 Truth -in- Taxation Hearing
193 (Councilmember O'Donnell was not on the Council)
194
195 C. Consideration of Minutes of December 12, 2005 City Council Meeting (Councilmember
196 O'Donnell was not on the Council)
197
198 Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the minutes of December 7, 2005 Council Work Session,
199 the minutes of December 12, 2005 Truth -in- Taxation Hearing, and the minutes of December 12, 2005
200 City Council Meeting. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion.
201
202 Motion carried 4 -0 -1. Councilmember O'Donnell abstained.
203
204 D. Consideration of Minutes of December 14, 2005 Council Work Session (Councilmember
205 O'Donnell was not on the Council)
206
207 Mayor Bergeson asked if there were minor corrections or if items D through F should be referred to
208 the next work session. Councilmember Carlson replied there was an additional page attached to the
209 December 14 minutes, there is a minor change on one set of minutes, and a comment on another.
210
211 City Administrator Heitke stated there was a copying problem with the December 14, 2005 minutes
212 where page five did not originally appear in the packet.
213
214 Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the minutes of December 14, 2005 Council Work Session
215 with the addition of page five and a change to page five, line 20, "employees and she suggested... ".
216
217 Motion failed for lack of a second.
218
219 E. Consideration of Minutes of December 19, 2005 City Council Meeting (Councilmember
220 O'Donnell was not on the Council)
221
222 F. Consideration of Minutes of September 8, 2005 Special Council Work Session
223 (Councilmember O'Donnell was not on the Council)
224
5
- 2 8 -
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 9, 2006
DRAFT
225 Councilmember Stoltz moved to send items D, E, and F to the next work session. Councilmember
226 Reinert seconded the motion.
227
228 Motion carried 4 -0 -1. Councilmember O'Donnell abstained.
229
230 COMMUNITY CALENDAR JANUARY 10, 2006 THROUGH JANUARY 23, 2006:
231
232 A) Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 6:30 p.m., Planning & Zoning Board Meeting
233 B) Thursday, January 12, 2006, 7:00 p.m., Charter Commission Meeting
234 C) Monday, January 16, 2006, City Hall Closed
235 D) Wednesday, January 18, 2006; 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session
236 D) Monday, January 23, 2006, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting
237
238 ADJOURN
239
240 There being no further business, Councilmember Carlson moved to adjourn at 7:15 p.m.
241 Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion.
242
243 Motion carried unanimously.
244
245 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, January 23, 2006.
246
247
248
249
250 ,City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
251
252 Transcribed by:
253 Cheryl Felix
254 Ti,neSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
255
6
-29
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 3 A
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 23 January 2006
SUBJECT Promotion
VOTE REQUIRED 3/5
BACK - GROUND
In order to maintain our compliment of four sergeants, the city recently underwent an internal
promotional process. A posting produced a number of applicants. Personnel Decisions
International prepared a promotional process including a background and experience evaluation,
written test, oral interview and a promotablity index.
After testing and interviewing, we have selected Officer Kyle Leibel for the position of Sergeant.
This will be effective immediately.
Mr. Leibel has been with the department since June of 1997.
OPTIONS
1. Offer the position of Sergeant to Kyle Leibel.
2. Deny the promotion.
RECOMMENDATION
Number One.
•
AGENDA ITEM 3 C
STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration
DATE 23 January 2006
SUBJECT Staff Transfer
VOTE REQUIRED 3/5
BACKGROUND
The promotion of Ms. Dawn Bugge created a vacancy for a department secretary in the
Community Development Department. I am recommending a transfer of Lisa Hogstad,
Receptionist/Secretary in Administration to this position. It is a lateral transfer. We will be
advertising for a replacement for Lisa as soon as possible.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Transfer
• 2. Deny the Transfer
RECOMMENDATION
Number One
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM A
STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety
Director /Chief of Police
DATE January 23, 2006
TOPIC
Annual renewal of Otter Lake Animal
Control Contract
VOTES REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
We have had Otter Lake Animal Control Center as our contract
holder for the past 10 years. Our relationship during this
time with the business has been very professional and we
were able to meet the needs of the citizens and the City by
utilizing the provisions of this contract. There are no
changes to the contract.
We request that the contract be renewed for calendar year
2006.
OPTIONS
1. Approve the request to enter into a renewal contract
with the Otter Lake Animal Control Center.
2. Return to staff for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of 2006, by and between
S the City of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014, hereinafter
referred to as the "Municipality ", and Otter Lake Animal Care Center, 6848 Otter Lake Road,
Hugo, Minnesota 55038, hereinafter referred to as "Otter Lake ", regarding the provision of
animal control services in the City of Lino Lakes.
•
•
The parties hereto agree as follows:
I. TERM
The term of this contract shall be from
through
II. BASIC SERVICES
Otter Lake agrees to provide the following services:
1. Shelter for animals on a 24 hour basis.
2. Pick up and transport to the shelter building during normal business hours, seven days per
week upon the request of the appropriate Municipal official.
3. Animal examinations and veterinary care as required whenever staff is available.
4. Boarding for up to seven (7) days.
5. Euthanasia and disposal of animals if required.
6. Assist in handling animal abuse /neglect cases in cooperation with Municipal officials
when necessary.
7. Vaccinate all boarders with Bordatella upon arrival at $5.00 per cat or dog.
111. COMPENSATION
1. The Municipality shall pay Otter Lake the following fees:
A. IMPOUND FEE: An administration charge of $55.00 per animal for the first day of
impound.
B. BOARDING FEE: $13.00 per day, per animal, for each day after the first day of
impound.
C. QUARANTINE FEE: In addition to the regular boarding fee, $4.00 per day, per
animal, for all animals which must be quarantined, not to exceed ten (10) calendar
days.
D. TRANSPORTATION FEE: $27.50 per pick up.
E. VETERINARY SERVICE: $40.00 per hour (maximum of $200.00 on any injury
charged to the city).
F. FLEA DIP: $15.00 per animal.
-33-
•
•
•
G. EUTHANASIA AND DISPOSAL FEE 0 - 30 lbs.
31 - 60 lbs.
61 lbs. and over
$11.00
$15.00
$19.00
H. VACCINATION FEE None (no vaccinations given).
2. The Municipality will not be charged those costs recovered from pet owners.
3. Charges for services, shall be paid monthly or within thirty (30) days after submission of
the monthly claims by Otter Lake to the Municipality. A copy of the impound sheet(s)
shall accompany the monthly claims.
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
In providing all services pursuant to this contract, Otter Lake Shall abide by all statutes,
ordinances rules and regulations pertaining to or regulating the provision of such services,
including those now in effect and hereinafter adopted. Otter Lake shall comply with
all requirements of Minn. Stat. 346.37 and shall indemnify and defendant the City
against any claimed violation of that statute, or any other statue, ordinance, rule or regulation
pertaining to the services provided by Otter Lake.
V. AUDIT DISCLOSURE AND RETENTION OF RECORDS
Otter Lake agrees to make available to duly authorized representative of the Municipality
and either the legislative auditor or the state auditor for the purpose to audit examination
pursuant to Minn. Stat. 16B.06, any books, documents, papers and records of Otter Lake
that are pertinent to Otter Lake's provision of services hereunder. Otter Lake further
agrees to maintain all such required records for three (3) years after receipt of final
payment and the closing of all other related matters.
VI. INSURANCE
Otter Lake shall purchase, maintain in full force and effect during the term of this
Contract the following insurance coverage:
1. WORKER'S COMPENSATION: Coverage at statutory limits as provided by the
State of Minnesota.
2. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY: Coverage shall have minimum
limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit for bodily injury
liability and property damage liability.
3. BUSINESS AUTO LIABILITY: Coverage shall have minimum limits of
$750,000 per occurrence, combined single limit of bodily injury liability and
property damage liability. This shall include owned vehicles hired and non -
owned vehicles and employee non - ownership.
2
-34-
•
shall
Current valid insurance certificates meeting the requirements herein identified
be filed with the Municipality before signing of this Contract. All policies shall
provide, and the certificate issued shall evidence, that the Municipality shall be
notified in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation or modification of
coverage.
VII. EARLY TERMINATION
This Contract may be teiminated by either party, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days
written notice, delivered by certified mail or in person, to the other party.
VIII. MODIFICATIONS
Any material alteration, modifications or variations of any terms of the Contract shall be
valid and enforceable only when they have been reduced to writing as an amendments and
signed by the parties. Municipality shall be named as an additional insured on all insurance
certificates.
IX. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
It is understood and agreed by the partied that the entire agreeement of the parties is
contained herein and that the Contract superseded all oral agreements and negotiations
between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements
presently in effect between Otter Lake and Municipality. The parties hereto revoke any prior
oral or written agreements between themselves and agree that this Contract is the only and
complete agreement regarding the subject hereof.
CITY OF LINO LAKES OTTER LAKE ANIMAL C CENTER
BY: BY:.�
• TITLE: TITLE:
BY: BY:
TITLE:
DATE:
•
4
- 3 6 -
Jv
•
AGENDA ITEM 6A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jim Jacques, TKDA
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 23, 2006
TOPIC: Public Hearing: Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program
VOTE REQUIRED: N/A
BACKGROUND:
In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended, (33
U.S.C. 1251 et. Seq., 40CFR 122, 123 and 124, as amended et seq.); Minnesota
Statues Chapters 115 and 116, as amended, and Minnesota Rules Chapter
7001, the city adopted a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and authorized
its submittal to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as part of the City's
application for enrollment in the State of Minnesota's General National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System Phase II Permit Authorizing the City's discharge of
storm water.
As part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, the City must solicit public
• input at an annual meeting required under the Public Education and Outreach
plan including:
• A presentation about implementation of the City's Surface Water
Pollution Prevention Program in 2005.
• Affording interested persons an opportunity to make oral statements
concerning the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program.
• Consideration of relevant written materials that interested persons
submit concerning the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program.
• Consideration of public input in making adjustments to the 2006
implementation plan for the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program
OPTIONS:
1. Close the Public Hearing.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option No. 1 - Staff recommends closing the public hearing.
•
4,,vo(v u:c @) (C rfl/t -!, -
ACGAttt'v. t
•
14L' 114
City of Lino Lakes
Storm Water Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Program
February 10, 2003
•
?,off
\\ %
+ \ \
7-1 °?
A
A
A
A
A
9 Oz
A
900Z
5 O
A
tOOZ
«Oz
��.
1
smuu.s gym- grppmey O6W -§eug
66i - 8 «g9 - X d
L Z Z 6- 9 -auoQd
iIO g mos uu A s wei oun 'AeNoped Jmuag uMo 009
Jo )O uewdga eQ AunwWoO ®rte @SIe yo m
•
•
•
m
A
A
A
A
A A
A
900Z
A
A
9002
9002
A
A
1700Z
£OOZ
£OOZ
� 3
!
t
�qg
kd:
Establish a local surface water advisory
committee to develop recommendations in
coordination with other entities such as
community groups, nonprofit organizations, lake
conservation districts, soil and water
conservation districts, the Rice Creek Watershed
District, the Vadnais Lake Area Water
Management Organization, school districts, the
University of Minnesota Extension, Anoka County
and regional, state and federal agencies. It's
mission will be to (1) Identify the audience or
audiences involved, (2) educational goals for
each audience in terms of increased awareness,
increased understanding, acquired skills and /or
desired changes in behavior, (3) Actives used to
reach educational goals for each audience, (4)
Activity implementation plans, including assigning
responsibilities for give activities and schedules,
and (5) developing performance measures that
can be used to determine success in reaching
educational goals.
Provide at least a 30 -day notice containing
relevant information about the Program and the
annual meeting. Notice should be distributed to
the official city newspaper and to the MPCA,
appropriate city and county officials and all other
persons who have requested that they be
informed of such public meeting.
Evaluate public participation projects such as an
adopt -a- lake or a student stormwater drain
stenciling.
Implement at least one of the Public Participation
Action Program Plans.
Review and adopt recommendations from the
Stormwater Advisory Committee.
Finalize a plan to implement of at least two
Stormwater Advisory Committee
recommendations.
u
.6
u
1
Stormwater Advisory Committee
Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program
Meeting Notice
Public Action Participation Program Evaluation
Public Action Participation Program Implementation
Stormwater Advisory Committee Recommendations
Stormwater Advisory Committee Recommendation
Implementation
!!
�
�t� E
Responsibtp
Persbt
srruiu.selehouino @eleyow6w - Iiew3
6617Z-Z86-199 - xed
LZt7Z-Z86-199 - auoyd
17 1059 eTosauu!W sa){ei oui1 'Aeivoped Jelueo uMOI 009
Joloa.aia Tuawdo,anaO Apunwwoo 'eleyowe laeyo!W
•
•
•
A
A
A
A
[0 z
A
900 z
Oz
/ 2 \8
k E: / 7 f \ ƒ
2 2
f/ aS /�t0 co ct
c0o0 /t0L_ =
CO n . 0 c CO §® 5
n >n— ._goae5_
t 0- C'.J LB 0 5 R 5
n = _ = w
b o a) -- 0 E m_§ p o
ac = ^oQ —o02
E / 5 2 2 7 7 5 c$ o
CZ >� \5 ƒu) /52.8
f\ (e30)e. a
ao=\...— Cc \f
£� � S -
o gC \ _§ $o=E / g f = % $
k 0_ cr;0(130 0) \eE
172 � = J
m� o c m o m 0 c
Zs f.12 e= 3 2 co
-. (E,co00
= o._ e e 0 a> 2
£ 'in 0 0 =� R= m o=
Storm Sewer System Map
(0
\ 0
\/
E §
8 12
0
cf�
o 0
$/o
=20
22
_ co o
k \
E
_
// _
0
o 0_
$
0
§
To
k
E
/
co
m
/
/
72
.5.<-
\
\
0 0
2 &
§
\
/ §2\
-0
$f$
20
o 0
c 0
\/\
E 0 \
c
52 m
0) 5 cri
E§ ®2
E a®
0 a k a
'Em
Non Storm Water Discharge Ordinances
§
0
/
E
0
0
-0
k\
0 0 )
\ E
/
/
f
2
0
Smuu.s wm- @rppmepgBu -feu]
66.17Z-Z86-1.99 - X
L »Z y[gg-auogd
H,099 mos uma s ie oun`Ae M9ed 2w@gumo 009
a mat TuOwdma eO�IunWLOO %rpee @ego!w
•
•
•
E
�
S
Y
u
r
�'
.vT`'
ey
is
y3
B
A
A
A
P.:
17002
iOOZ
17OOZ
ECU
kz�sfl�.y
A
Prepare an erosion, sedimentation and pollution
control plan to address issues such as trash,
construction debris, leaking vehicles, storage of
chemicals etc.
Update the erosion, sedimentation and pollution
control plan. Update and adopt ordinances and
policies. Also include certification requirements
for design personnel. Refine necessary
procedures for the submittal, review, approval
and enforcement of erosion and sediment control
plans.
Refine as necessary construction site operator
requirements for implementation of appropriate
erosion and sediment control best management
practices and for the control of wastes, such as
discarded building materials, concrete truck
washout, chemicals, litter, and sanitary waste at
the construction site that may cause adverse
impacts to water quality.
Refine as necessary the inspection program for
inclusion of procedures for receipt and
consideration of reports of non compliance or
other information on construction related issues
submitted by the public.
9
4 P
$ i
Erosion, Sedimentation and Pollution Control
Planning
Erosion, Sedimentation and Pollution Control Policies
and Ordinances
Site Operator Requirements
Construction Site Runoff Inspection Program
� ..
µ'
'
L•
0
sn•uw•sawhoupo@eieyoa6w - pew3
66iZ -Z86- 699 - xed
LZtZ- 286-699 - auoyd
i60gg eaosauuiW sa){e7 ouil 'Aem)ped JeTuaa umoi 009
JopaJia luewdoianea Apunwwoa `eleyowe laeyon
•
•
•
c "S
q
t
x'44
F s y
Implementation
(year)
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
9003
17003
t7003
A
17003
E003
EON
a®M1A
Develop a plan to annually inspect all structural
pollution control devices such as trap manholes,
grit chambers, sumps, floatable skimmers and
traps, separators and other small settling or
filtering devices. Also develop a plan for the
annual inspection of at least 20% of MS4 outfalls,
sediment basins and ponds. Based on the
Implement the Plan and Train Employees
The necessary repair and maintenance should be
completed in the same year as the inspection or,
if impracticable, be incorporated into the next
year's work plan. Such maintenance should be
discussed in the NPDES Phase II General Permit
annual report.
Continue a priority and budgeting system for
sweeping public parking lots and streets at least
twice a year.
Develop or refine standard construction
requirements, access standards and
maintenance easements, maintenance
covenants including inspection, maintenance,
repair and sweeping of parking lots and private
roads at least twice a year and require reports for
inclusion in NPDES Phase II General Permit
annual reports. Also develop an inspection
program.
Train City employees to implement the Plan.
w
a4.:V 3
e:
R
9®
� 2
xR^t
y�
Annual Water Resource Infrastructure Inspection
Plan
Implement Water Resource Infrastructure Inspection
Plan
Infrastructure Repair and Maintenance
Public Parking Lot and Street Sweeping
Privately Constructed Water Resource Infrastructure
Performance Plan.
Privately Constructed Water Resource Infrastructure
Performance Implementation.
y 0
o
n a
�
sn uw sa a oui io e e 3oa6w - HewD
6617Z-396-L99 - xed
L313-396- 659 - auoyd
176099 eaoseum sa)e-1 owl 'Aewp d _Iowa° umol 009
Jotoana ;uewdoIanap ATiunwwoO'eleyoaE laeyoiW
•
•
Implementation
(year)
A
9 Oz
900Z
900Z
tooz
1700Z
Jam\
ƒ� \
.
3
� � \
Coordinate with the Rice Creek Watershed
District and Vadnais Lake Area Water
Management Organization to develop defensible
engineering and technical standards for runoff
volume and rate control consistent with NPDES
Phase II and more specifically addressing local
needs.
Coordinate with the Rice Creek Watershed
District and Vadnais Lake Area Water
Management Organization to develop defensible
engineering and technical standards for reducing
pollutant loads consistent with NPDES Phase II
and more specifically addressing local needs.
Evaluate development and construction manuals
that incorporate structural and /or non - structural
best management practices that can be used to
meet or exceed stormwater management
quantity and quality goals. Such best
management practices should be consistent with
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency guidance.
Adopt or refine a development and construction
manual to include selected best management
practices. Also adopt or amend appropriate
ordinances and procedures.
1Trnin amnlnvaac and imnlAmAnt tha nrrlinnrinP
using the developed procedures.
CITY O� LINO LAKES NPDES
114; rr „� POSTCONSTRUC
1.
AB
� \\
Runoff Volume and Rate Control
Runoff Quality Control
Design and Construction Manual and Ordinance
Evaluation
Design and Construction Manual and Ordinance
Adoption
Implement Ordinances and Procedures
Responsible 1
Person
smuwse m -omrppmeL10 g6w -feu]
66i-96-.g9 -xe]
L-86-9 -ouoQd
PlO g mo eu@A s )iB oun 'Aenopeci ieu ouMoi 009
uqoa 4O mewdga eO &gnWUOO'ep28 Pe4!m
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 2005 Activity Summary
The enclosed City of Lino Lakes Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP)
describes the goals for that the City of Lino Lakes set for itself under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). These goals include:
(1) The Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented for each of
the storm water minimum control measures described in the)) of the
Minnesota Pollution Agency's (MPCA) General NPDES Permit;
(2) Measurable goals for each of the BMPs, including, as appropriate, the months
and years in which the City will undertake required actions, including interim
milestones and frequency of the action in the narrative;
(3) Estimated yearly timelines in which the City will implement each BMP; and,
(4) Person(s) responsible for implementing and /or coordinating each component
of the Phase II Storm Water Program.
When the City submitted its SWPPP to the MPCA, it expressed concern about finding
funding sources for implementation of this SWPPP while noting that all levels of
government in Minnesota are under a cloud of revenue shortfalls. Such new unfunded
mandates are financially burdensome to implement and the City urged MPCA to
consider this as the NPDES Phase II program evolves.
This year the City began to:
✓ Update its web site to include storm water education on topics such as fertilizer
and pesticide application, littering and proper storage of chemicals and yard
waste materials;
✓ Develop a mailing list for developer, construction and engineering practitioner
community;
✓ Implement Public Participation Action Program Plans such as storm water
stenciling;
✓ Set in motion a review and adoption recommendations from its Environmental
Advisory Committee;
✓ Modify existing hazardous materials response procedures, as necessary;
✓ Train City employees to implement the Plan; and,
✓ Evaluate development and construction manuals that incorporate structural
and /or non - structural best management practices that can be used to meet or
exceed stormwater management quantity and quality goals.
1.1337H 1.11.1E DE THE -o;Yil..)THEAST 3.5.JA0TE0
ciF SEC. 18, DAli, 31, 9J'ID.
"••
.• • •
108,130 S.F.
-11.5 3;2'
51911Q50..00
11'94t
288"257"W
•
'
L.••••".
n
NORTH
Stele. 1 Inch = 50 Feet
For the purpose of this survey. the North
line of the Southedost guar, ot Sistinn
18. Township 31. Range 3:2 is ossureed to
hear 035 22' 57°E.
Parcel G
That part of the Southeast °garter of Section 18. Township 31. Rage 22. Anode, County.
Minnesota, described az commencing at the Northeost corner of said Southeast °porters
thence South 37 degrees 22 minutes 57 seconds West, asstened bearing. slicing the 14o01h
tine ed Sal Southeast Ouneket 0 distance of 2093.34 feet to the point of beginning of the
parcel to he described. thence South 01 degrees 37 minutes 03 seconds East 0 distan,
of 645.37 feet: thence So0th 55 degrees 22 minutes 57 seconds West. 7070 feet: thence
South 01 degrees 37 minutes 03 seconds East. 16.00 feet: thence South 88 degrees 22
minutes 57 seorinds West. 191.85 teed thence tooth 50 degrees 20 rninutes 29 seconds
West. 203.19 feet; thence South 30 degrees IS moutes 27 seconds West. 225,00 F. to
th, wesilo, of soid Southeast Ousel, thence tlorth 051 degrees 01 minutes 09 seconds
East. otong said west line, 821 53 feet to the North line of 2014 Southeast 0,..of let, thence
North 88 degrees 22 minutes 5, seconds task. along said Nnrih line. 561 16. feet to the
point of begionina.
Parcel G-6 (Drainage and Utility Easement)
A PerDetoat easement for poblic drainoge and utility purposes nyer. dnder d.,..nde the
following desxribed parcefi beginning at the. Northwest comer of the 5outhecst idiartei
Section 10, Tosstship 31 Ran 22. Anoka County. Minnesota: thence North 35 degrees
20 ntinutes 57 secnnds East. 37 an as8ened bearing. along the Nartn line 01 said
Southeast Smarter distance of 531 IS reel: thence South 01 degrees 97 074001,5 26
seconds Ens1 c dist-Ince of 91.00 teed Iheuse Sohn, 13 degrees 22 minides 57 seconds
West distance of 18,5 37 feet: then, 5ooth 42 degrees 05 mattes 06 stoonds West
*stance of 337 25 feet to a point , 0,e hereinafter 4,1,0 05 point hi thence continuing
olong Mt extension of the tast descrihed line a distance of 26.19 feet, the.nce South 79
degrees 25 minutes 59 seconos West. a distance of 27.45 feet: thence South 48 degrees
.25 minutes 37 seconds West a distance of 26.69 teeti thence North 55 degrees 10
minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 19 32 feet, therics South 79 degrees 25 minutes
5,3 se...onds West o disfonoe nt 35 53 feet to dite West tine 0. 5051 20.0thessl Oaarter;
thence N.orth 0,3 degrees gi ins3otes 03 seconds Eost along sad West line o distorice of
370.00 feet to the s.oint of r4-9innir,
a strip of tan, 00 00 feet 0 width the Westerly and Sontherly tine of which is descritted
commensind the preyiousty 3,35-9..ed point 4, thence Scpth 42 degrees 5 minutes
13 seconds East distorts, of 116 .99 feet: thence South .31 degrees 49 minutes 43
0e0an0s East a distance oi 175 59 fez, thence North go degrees 0 minotes 0 seoonds
East a distance of 103.59 feet: ,enze Sguih 30 degxees 12 000111es 10 seconds East
4; 41.00.' .0 of 60.35 teet and said Fin here lermingling.Said easement is to extend try its
full width from 450: Ecistenv line of the prestousty deSeribed •asemern to o line which is
04 rihht ann.es ta sai.3 line 014 *01.1: 5005e3 through the point et termiastic,
50.9ethe0 with perpelval eosernent tar ingress and egxess purposes cixer Inc 15tiossing
described paszeli beginning at prenously oesentied point 0: thence. South 42 dygrees
minutes 6 seconds West o Jistonce of 26,19 leeti thence South 73 deatess 25 minutes
29 seconds West a distance of 27 45 feet. thence South 48 degrees 25 minutes 37
seconds We a distonce of 20.69 Ie.,: thence North 55 degrees 12 minutes seconds
West 0 dislonce of 17 32 feet. then'. Sctzth 79 degrees 20 minutes 59 seconas West a
distance of 39 63 feet to the West 1.0e 01 said 500theast 90arter thence 200th 0
degrees 1 minute 9 seconds West. otorta said West line o distance of 62 40 feef :thence
1.1,10 51 degrees 30 minutes 12 semi-ids Eost a distance of 169.90 feet to it's
intersection with a line which bears South 42 degrees 5 minutes 13 seconds East and
which posses through the point of steginningithence 00,0 42 degrees 5 minutes 13
seconds WOSI 0 77100, of 20.30 feet to the Coe01 ef beginMngi
end a perpezual eosement tor ingress and egress purposes ovei the toIlowing deserted
Parsed sornmencing 01106 14,1020-21 come, of sod 5.0t.dhenst Gout-ter. thence South 58
degrees 20 minutes 57 sf on. West. assumed bearing clong the 14000 tine of said
3outheast 1933rter o distance of (:9504 feet: thence South i degree 37 minuffS.
seconds East o distance of 543 02 teet to di, point of beginning; thence oontinuing
South 1 degree 37 minutes 1 se:ones Ea, mong the extansion of the tosI .iescribad ih4e.
19555 feet. th.,nce 20.045<2 deatees 22 minutes 57 se:ones West distance of 70010
feet: thence North I dearee 37 minutes 3 seconds West 0 distance or 16.00 fee::
thence North 44 degrees 31 minutes 50 Ee.coch.., West a distance of 77.33 feet: thence
Sdartheety. Easterly 004 SOutherty ,010n0 tangentiat 0090 0000000 to Inc South having 0
radius of 71.00 feet and a control angle of 222 degrees 54 minutes 55 seconds for a
distance of 275.23 feet to 110 poirl 04 beginning.
LEGEND
PROPOSED EASEMENTS
EXISTING EASEMENTS
I 13, My Mre.CI 70,,..770.77 070 '77' 077 0
7:77,0 '770 000vey, under the law, c5 the 340te of 4,4,0,,
1.sted 47H 00, 11 4061080. 2(06
REVISIONS
1050.0(11
0,07
1/3/06
NORTHWEST CORNER, OF •
SJ0THEAST OLIAFTER
Fr. 1E
oC° 005 a O /b Nf ..TH`4JE Of THE SOUTHEAST
900
901
2
14
899
��VARY SLOPES_?.
hnros Fhw'a`6R3—
00
„9 ,
DFD4
II I(EE
;:c!dEidTl.
Net r4;P•m.iz
POSSIBLE
FUTURE
BUILDING
FILL
DITCH
S •PE
' I
.T IN
'(PAINAG
AND
1 LiTILITr
A :EI•!ENIT
® FFE 907.00
TAN
WALL
%
I sB�Cc
so
330307
(0)03E0 T
ROD
\\
E. <I�TINI,
-.— DFAIIJAGE o04
AND
UTILITY
EA.-EMENT
9052
53.]
PP0P0'ED.'
DRAINAGE'
EA0.EIHENT
906
000308>ED
DFAINAGE'
EASEMENT
PROPOSED
ROAD
RIGHT OF BEGIN a3az
WAY CON'_TRLN_TIOf!
•
903
902 e
I EIISTII'0
1 8130)1.10G0
ANL:
UTILITY
EATIME ,
j `454
90
904
E6ISTI8
DRAINAGE
- AND'
UT IL I 'Y
EASEMENT
_—
BEGIN
iCOPICTRUCTION
vq
9p6 O( C.
GRADING NOTES
PROPOSED CONTOURS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. SPOT
ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSED CURB DENOTE GUTIERLINE.
EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORD
DRAWINGS AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.
THE INFORMATION 15 NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT
LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. TO RE0UE5T EXACT FIELD
LOCATION OF UTILITIE5. THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR
RELOCATING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (1- 800 - 252 -1166) 48
HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.
CONTRACTOR REOUIREO TO PROTECT THE TREES TO BE SAVED. SHOULD
ANY PORTION OF 190 TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT
OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
OBTAIN THE 5089005 OF A PROFESSIONAL TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE
TREES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING
OF ANY LIMBS, THE 8ROKEN LIMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND
CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE.
NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION BY THE ENGINEER_
COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE
GRADING CONTRACT.
CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE— SPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL
TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM FOUR INCH DEPTH TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE
SODDED OR SEEDED.
THE FINISHED BUILDING SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE
THAN 0.10 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE PROPOSED ELEVATION. STREET OR
PARKING AREA SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN
0.05 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AREAS TO
RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.10 FEET OF THE REQUIRED
ELEVATION UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. TOPSOIL SHALL
BE GRADED TO WITHIN 14 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY — NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE A
CO— APPLICANT WITH THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE
REWIRED INSPECTION REPORTS AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF
THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES.
MAINTENANCE
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM
TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED,
ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE
CONSTRUCTION, IF REWIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED
AREAS WHERE TURF 15 TO BE ESTABLISHED. SHALL BE SEEDED AND
MULCHED.
WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY
SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER,
CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE AND COMPACT TO
REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.
AFTER SITE GRADING 15 COMPLETED. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL
MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS
MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR
IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE
A WOOD FIBER BLANKET SHALL BE FURNISHED AND PLACED IN AREAS
WHERE THE SLOPE EXCEEDS 3:1.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE DEWAIERING AS REQUIRED TO
COMPLETE THE 511E GRADING CONSTRUCTION.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY — NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (1PDE5) PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
BE REWIRED TO BE A CO— APPLICANT WITH THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL COMPLETE THE 860918E0 INSPECTION REPORTS. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF 111E EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES. A COPY OF THE PERMIT CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE ENGINEER.
ALL MATCH POINTS AND PAVEMENT PATCHES TO BE SAWCUT AT FULL
DEPTH.
INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES
GRADING SEQUENCE — ROUGH GRADING SHALL BE DONE IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE REST OF THE SITE. EXCAVATE 'WITHIN 3 0.3' OF FINISHED
GRADE, WITH LIGHT OR RUBBER —TIRED EQUIPMENT. FINAL GRADING OF
BASIN SHALL BE DELAYED UNTIL REMAINDER DF SITE 15 FINISH GRADED AND
SEEDED. NO OVER — EXCAVATION OF BASIN AREA 15 ALLOWED. AFTER
FINISH GRADING, TILL THE BASIN FLOOR TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF SIX
INCHES. MIX TOPSOIL WITH ON —SITE SANDY SOILS IN A RATIO OF 50/50,
OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. NO EQUIPMENT MAY BE DRIVEN
ACROSS THE BASIN FLOOR AFTER GRADING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETE.
EROSION CONTROL — PLACE SILT FENCE AROUND BASIN AREA IMMEDIATELY
AFTER ROUGH GRADING 15 FINISHED. MAINTAIN UNTIL FINISH GRADING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT WORK IS DONE AND VEGETATION 15 65196158E0 AND
GROWING.
TURF ESTABLISHMENT — SEED WITH CITY APPROVED MIXTURE. IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.
VEGETATION IN PONDS AND 114FI11690CN AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH
DEEP—ROOTED NATIVE VEGETATION (1.49001 MIX 310NWT OR SUITABLE
WETLAND SEED EQUIVALENT). RE— VEGETATION SHALL COMMENCE WITHIN 14
DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. MANAGEMENT PONDS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH
0,001 MIX 270 PER THE 90001 2003 DISTRICT SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
PUBLICATION MEANS AND METHODS OR EQUAL APPROVED BY A LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATON.
INFILTRATION AREA TO BE GRADED TO FINAL GRACIE AFTER STAB0ZATION
OF UPSTREAM AREA5.
REMOVE ORGANIC MATERIAL 45 THE INFILTRATION AREA REPLACE WITH
SAND
JAN 0 -T 2006
LEGEND
EXIST.;
NE
LO7 ONE
EDE/EalmE
E43MLNI ONE
i DDB A EDDIED
MINOF CONTOUR
SPOT EtEvANoN,
DD4NAGE NAPE.
DrODING
EV na4nn
DAP, 9 MANHOLE
51949.■ WNW.
APED Ex
a
DENOILE
ii,KE
690205E9
ONO
0800 .eo
••.
•
•
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL
DISTURBED AREAS ON THE SITE HAVE BEEN RESTORED.
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL TO BE PLACED AROUND STORM DRAIN
STRUCTURE AS AN INLET PROTECTION MEASURE DURING CON5180000N
SEE DETAIL).
SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AS
NECESSARY AND MUST BE REMOVED IF DESIGN CAPACITY HAS BEEN
REDUCED BY FIFTY PERCENT.
A 5TABILI2E0 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE
BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION MO MAINTAINED FOR DURATION OF PROJECT.
ROCK ENTRANCES MUST BE REPLACED OR ADDED TO IF ROCK PORE
SPACES BECOME FILLED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT TO BE
SODDED. SEEDING SHALL BE PER 44.001 SPECIFICATION 3876 APPLIED AT
A RAZE OF FIFTY POUNDS PER ACRE. SEEDING IN POND 960 INFILTRATION
AREAS SHALL BE MIXTURE 310NWT (NATIVE WET TALL) IN ACCORDANCE
WITH MnDOT SPECIFICATION 3876 APPLIED AT A RATE OF 82 POUNDA PER
ACRE. MULCH SHALL BE PER 1.10D01 SPECIFICATION 3882. TYPE 2 THE
MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE 6,1TH Mn007 SPECIFICATION
2575.3, F1. MULCH TO BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF TWO TONS PER ACRE.
MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH A DISC, CLODBUSTER OR OTHER
APPROVED EQUIPMENT.
of
VI O
N M
oa
Q U7
W Eel
J I— 9i
W z
1na
7
N Q
Z
10/06/05
C1.0
r:.
L.E OF THE 32415811,1 (11111)1
F. '
PROPOSED 1 \ Ii• ,'l e
FFOF'_LPI
DFAI ROAD A`. ,,♦'�
NIAGE' RIGHT OF
La A"EMEIJS BEGIN �•
WAY fptJ:TF'UCTIOIJ
../' ' J
EXISTING
DRAINAGE
AND
061111
'.EASEMENT
i
180 EI,
LF
1116iN1
EXI S TINO
DRAINAGE
AND
IT IL IT
EASEMENT
I :
CONS IrLffil
STORM DRAIN NOTES
LIO
LEGEND
E %15.
JAN 07 200&
on, LOIS
0:00, LINE
OPP Got,
CE -
DN. POLE 0
F0Nreat Gr0Li -0- -0-
TELCLITOVIC at
SataTFev -•-
«E 0 •a•
erefrar R
oar, VAL,E _ •
Fief Wa ERMAN -I-
STORM DRAIN NOTES
CATCH BASINS SHALL NOT BE BAO0FLLED UNTIL FABRIC WRAP IS
INSPECTED BY THE CITY.
TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE PLACED ALL STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS.
PROVIDE CLASS 0 RIFRAP WITH FILTER FABRIC FOR ALL RIFE OUTLETS.
THE LAST THREE 56051055 OF CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE 11ED, INCLUDING
APRON, FOR CONCRETE PIPE LESS THAN 48 -15C4 DIAMETER. ALL
SECTIONS SHALL BE TIED FOR CONCRETE RIFE OF 46 -INCH OIAMETER OR
LARGER.
UTILITY NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING
45LITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF
SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.
ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS 51102N ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT
"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL- (E51 -454 -0002) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS 46
HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATIOJ.
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF
"STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATERMAIN AND SERVICE LINE
INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION° AS
PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.
CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS TO BE SUMPEO 0.04 FEET.
CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS TO GE SuMPED 0.00 FEET PER DETAILS.
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.
ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED FIVE FEET 014150 RACK OF CURE
ONLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
TYPICAL HYDRANT CONSISTS OF: HYDRANT, GATE VALVE. 2.5 FEET OF 51X
INCH DIP WATERMAIN AND ANY HYDRANT EXTENSION. EXTENSIONS TO BE
INCIDENTAL.
HYDRANT TO SE wATEROUR PACE 00 -07. B.5 BURY.
VALVES SHALL GE 815111151 SEAT GATE - MUELLER A2770 -20 108 EOUAL)
A 0151605 OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER 15 80041RED DYER ALL 0ATERMAINS,
0415155 OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA OEPI* NAY BF. 88050815 5D MAINTAIN
A MINIMUM OF EIGHTEEN INCHES VERTICAL SEPARATION TO 54111'1451 SEWER
OR STORM DRAIN LINES.
MI ORU M 01015011 1800E5 CF VE11I0AL 50045480, ANC
'E5
00ET
00 N SEPARATION IS REQUIRED 405 AL. U1LiT0S. NLFSS
OTHERWISE 501 ?e.
15 SANITARY 510ER PIPE 10 81 P01100 5 01 11LORIJE PIPE (F'.4 C.) 50P
28 'JNEESS GTHERwI_E NOTED.
CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN AS -80111 PLANS 88100011011 CTION
AND SUBMIT 14051 PLANS TD 150NE14AuPON COMPLETION J,1 w,OR0
CONTRACTOR TO 1, EMS111, ALANHCLED ..1 PROPOS, ..P4O...
0
Z
N
00
Z
O \� J
¢H—w d
Y
Oi J
NO 10
F
U, 0
0 EL
_o¢
5
JAL JAL
1650.001
11/11/05
C1.1
E ;
,� *
*� f 'r i '
'•I,•
l � •.
POSSIBLE
FUTURE
BUILDING �•
-' - IIM
# / /.� "• I
I
•
FFOPO EC
IFAII∎I 0 \4`,1 5
5 1
♦ y �
�— ,
,eL.
Fall :L e. i•,
DRAINAGE:
i
EASEMENT ,
s
EXISTING
DRAINAGE
AND
061111
'.EASEMENT
i
180 EI,
LF
1116iN1
EXI S TINO
DRAINAGE
AND
IT IL IT
EASEMENT
I :
CONS IrLffil
STORM DRAIN NOTES
LIO
LEGEND
E %15.
JAN 07 200&
on, LOIS
0:00, LINE
OPP Got,
CE -
DN. POLE 0
F0Nreat Gr0Li -0- -0-
TELCLITOVIC at
SataTFev -•-
«E 0 •a•
erefrar R
oar, VAL,E _ •
Fief Wa ERMAN -I-
STORM DRAIN NOTES
CATCH BASINS SHALL NOT BE BAO0FLLED UNTIL FABRIC WRAP IS
INSPECTED BY THE CITY.
TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE PLACED ALL STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS.
PROVIDE CLASS 0 RIFRAP WITH FILTER FABRIC FOR ALL RIFE OUTLETS.
THE LAST THREE 56051055 OF CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE 11ED, INCLUDING
APRON, FOR CONCRETE PIPE LESS THAN 48 -15C4 DIAMETER. ALL
SECTIONS SHALL BE TIED FOR CONCRETE RIFE OF 46 -INCH OIAMETER OR
LARGER.
UTILITY NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING
45LITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF
SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.
ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS 51102N ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT
"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL- (E51 -454 -0002) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS 46
HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATIOJ.
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF
"STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATERMAIN AND SERVICE LINE
INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAIN INSTALLATION° AS
PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.
CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS TO BE SUMPEO 0.04 FEET.
CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS TO GE SuMPED 0.00 FEET PER DETAILS.
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.
ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED FIVE FEET 014150 RACK OF CURE
ONLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
TYPICAL HYDRANT CONSISTS OF: HYDRANT, GATE VALVE. 2.5 FEET OF 51X
INCH DIP WATERMAIN AND ANY HYDRANT EXTENSION. EXTENSIONS TO BE
INCIDENTAL.
HYDRANT TO SE wATEROUR PACE 00 -07. B.5 BURY.
VALVES SHALL GE 815111151 SEAT GATE - MUELLER A2770 -20 108 EOUAL)
A 0151605 OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER 15 80041RED DYER ALL 0ATERMAINS,
0415155 OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA OEPI* NAY BF. 88050815 5D MAINTAIN
A MINIMUM OF EIGHTEEN INCHES VERTICAL SEPARATION TO 54111'1451 SEWER
OR STORM DRAIN LINES.
MI ORU M 01015011 1800E5 CF VE11I0AL 50045480, ANC
'E5
00ET
00 N SEPARATION IS REQUIRED 405 AL. U1LiT0S. NLFSS
OTHERWISE 501 ?e.
15 SANITARY 510ER PIPE 10 81 P01100 5 01 11LORIJE PIPE (F'.4 C.) 50P
28 'JNEESS GTHERwI_E NOTED.
CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN AS -80111 PLANS 88100011011 CTION
AND SUBMIT 14051 PLANS TD 150NE14AuPON COMPLETION J,1 w,OR0
CONTRACTOR TO 1, EMS111, ALANHCLED ..1 PROPOS, ..P4O...
0
Z
N
00
Z
O \� J
¢H—w d
Y
Oi J
NO 10
F
U, 0
0 EL
_o¢
5
JAL JAL
1650.001
11/11/05
C1.1
BUFFERYARD / BERM PLANTING SCHEDULE
SYM' KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE
® BH 'Black Hills' Spruce Picea glauca densata'B.H'
• CS Cutleaf Staghorn Sumac Rhus typhina 'Laciniata'
• 1 FG 'Fallgold' Ash Fraxinus nigra'Fallgold'
• I FW French Pussy_Willow Salix caprea
• GA 'Summit' Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica'Summit'
NP Norway (Red) Pine Pinus resinosa
O NW 'Niobe' Weeping Willow Salix alba'Tristis'
is PK Northern Pin Oak Quercus ellipsoidalis
L • QA ' Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides
• RT '!santi Redtwig Dogwood Comus sedcea'!santi'
• SM 'Green Mountain' Sugar Maple Acer saccharum'Green Mountain'
TOTALS - TREES /SHRUBS
QTY. • NOTES
8 Fully branched to ground I
#5 cont. 17 _ Plant 10' on center
2" BB 9 Single, straight leader I
#5 cont. 15 Multi -stem
2" BB 3 1 Single, straight leader
5' BB 11 Fully branched to ground
2" BB 8 Single leader I
2" BB 2 j Single, straight leader
#25 cont. 10 Single leader
#5 cont. 39 Plant 8' on center I
2" BB 3 Single, straight leader
54/71
PARKING LOT - TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE
i SYM KEY I COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME
® i BH ; 'Black Hills' Spruce Picea glauca densata'B.H'
• i PK j Northern Pin Oak Quercus ellipsoidalis
r 41,--i RD Red Oak Quercus rubra
I • 'i RM I 'Autumn Spire' Red Maple Acer rubrum'Autumn Spire'
1 • j SS i 'Spring Snow' Crabapple Malus Spring Snow'
TOTAL
SIZE ! QTY. NOTES
6' BB ! 3 Fully branched to ground
2" BB I 9 Single, straight leader
2" B8 1 2 Sing straight leader
2" BB I 3 Single, straight leader
1.5" BB I 4 Single leader
21
Notes.
• Nand loosen loots of t...p¢ reed maferal.
• Resaa Nan from lop of BBB 4400.
• warty boMm and sods snide pro d denting.
•• Use waling amp to Whiled
•!Iis the Coated. , OOPS le Slake.d4. nceeve. Bo Contractors
tessmnblelot manwinngtrees in a plumb poll t140400ullbe
ready seed.
Typical Deciduous Tree Planting Detail
Not 00 Scale
EA TD•8E SEEDED WITH
TY,A1OPROVED NATIVE,
LAND SEED MIX
20 40
SCALE r - 40
Double wand 14 gates .ha. oe
poteyepllene m pNremylene s040,
44md,112 woeamine Punk
Interred to first branch
Cd wiriest ink pre bides away
Lambe O'meal am slate lop of
WWI lush.* maim Bade
SNeddel herTeod nee
g 4 de*
Graudm4r 1see sit adscape
pbnblype)
Rodbell
Bedfpludh eailbg inedemus
Set 40040 on undisturbed
subs ede
05004000 peers04
80
AREA TO BE SEEDED WITH
CITY APPROVED NATIVE,
UPLAND SEED MIX
s�� 'Fiee�x4ua em® � ��Ae°�s.
Notes:
• Remove burlap twine of BO maeal.
• Scarily bottom and Pies oI Me cot to owing
'Weer kee. lamp to remove ar pocees.
• Use ensung magmas sod es Paced soli
• Co not dace mulch in 400104 in le me dmk.
• It IS DA 00 0 110 a40 wsl5Ae 4tts', hara0e. ao Corr0orn
rsponede lot mmenirg Res in a plumb posim.eago..
evenly perctl.
Typical Coniferous Tree Planting Detail
M 14 440450 e
Pdprop4lare of pdtsethykre
step, 40 rod. 1 VT,. nye)
Cuenealma, pull bap
stray fronds olmdball and
eau top Mrwb40:E00v00
e.mg grade
Shreddedbad000dnukh
9002,10
eraindmaatuesr landscape
Rodbell
Beafidwei early?Mosso.
sort
Bel weal on u400t4t d
aagaee
Wasted 00040 e
Not to Scale
Notes:
rvRd Maimed mat.
Remove Neap Pm Nap of BO mama.
•Sat won, meo.ses oimie mRb ones. remove orpoutts
WAD DAD Use rAeii0Wmpeipl zbo0:1 wi torenuo
no0omw I1<e sue ardrmpe pen
MIWe)
Typical Shrub Planting Detail
Enmoeptonwdebaded PADUA
DRAW. ROD.
Not to Scale
PLANTING NOTES:
Contractor shalt provide a one year guarantee on all plan! materials. The guarantee begins on the
date of the landscape 010014004 or Owner's written acceptance of the initial planting. Replacement
plant materials shall also nave a one year guarantee comments upon planting.
The Owner shall he responsible for maintenance after the Owner's acceptance of the wore.
All plants are to be northern grown and hardy.
Plants to be installed as per standard PAN planting practices.
Use existing, indigenous soil for 01ck011 material In tree planting holes and pulverized topsoil tor
back0ll malarial material in shrub planting holes. see planting delaes for depths. Use a Sell mN of
1 -1 -1 (pulverized 40400 sand, peal moss) for perennial beds, metalled at a minimum depth of 12•.
It is are Contractor's responsibility to verify lesions with all utilities prior to any site work including:
grading, installation of plants and irrigation system.
All sod areas shad be brgale4 with an automated underground sprinkler system. All additl00al
landscaped areas shall be inigaled with ether spray heads or with leaky pipe% as appropriate to the
plant bpd Seeded areas do not require trdgation.
Staking of trees Is optional elthough the Lanscape Contactor Is responsible to reposldon any trees
that are not plumb within the one year warranty pNgd.
Wrap all smooth-barked trees and fasten at top and bottom. Remove by Apr 1.
Open lop of burlap on BB materials, remove pot from potted plants and gently loosen mots it needed.
Prune plants as necessary per standard nursery pacers.
Plants shall be immediately planted upon arrlv-41 at slue. Properly heel In material if necessary
(temporary only).
All disturbed areas are to be either sodded or seeded as noted. Sod shad be northern grown and
hardy. A 4• (depth) layer of topsoil shall be installed In all areas to be sodded.
Planting beds for shrubs are perennials shall have 5.5 (vertical) Mack poly edging (commercial
grade). weed barrier fabric or poly banter and mulch. The edging shall be placed and slaked with
smooth curves. See landscape plan(s) for depth and ye r 1100.
Shredded hardwood mulch shad be prov0ed around all installed trees al a depth of 4• and a diameter
of4'Men.).
SOD / SEEDING 8 IRRIGATION NOTES:
• All disturbed areas are to be either sodded Or seeded es noted on sae landscape plan (s).
• Sod shad be northern grown and hardy. A 4• (depth) layer of pulverized topsoil shall be incorporated
into all areas to be sodded by rolotiUing and grading smooth.
• Sod areas and landscaped areas (including berms) are to be irrigated with an automated irrigation
system An •As -Boil" Ilan shall be prowde0 to the Owner at completion of system installation.
• Areas disturbed by site work/grading (berms and level areas) shall be seeded with Lino Lakes, City e designated native seed mix for upland soils.
Pond edges (4:1 slopes) shall be seeded with Lino Lakes, City designated native seed mu for
wetland soils.
• Seeded areas must be installed and maintained to maturity (3-5 veers) by a Ciro aooroved
9
0
J F-
Ott
O
z
0
Z
z LL1 Y
� � J
00
1- Z
� J
< t�
F— J
00
DESIGNED
DCCK
SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN
DRAPAI
CCK
PROJECT t
1650.001
DATE
11/10/05
SHEET Y
C1.2
Ye Ye
3/y diameter limestone mulch,
,over 6 mil poly
Notes:
' Hand loosen mots of containerized material.
• Remove burlap tom lop or BBB 00/5,10.
' Somity bottom and sides of hole pia to planing.
• Water plain, tamp to rernove arc pockets.
• Use Whvenxed topsoil as backfill soil for shrubs.
Gmundrm'er)see site landscape plan
tif type)
5 S0 poiy edging
Remote peril from manner and
place lop of football flush with existing
grade
Weed barrier taboo or poly
Mulch (see ale andscape pan la
type and dept)
Typical Shrub Planting Detail
Rooting
Backe en pulverized topsoil
Set mo0all m undisturbed subgrade
Undisturbed subgrade
Not to Scale
FOUNDATION PLANTING SCHEDULE
SYM
KEY
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
SIZE
QTY.
NOTES
etr
SL
'Slowmound' Mugho Pine
Pinus mugo'Slowmound'
Euonymus alatus 'Compactus'
I #3 cont.
#5 cont.
3
4
-
Plant 7' on center
.
DW
Dwarf Winged Euonymus
•
GS
'Goldflame' Spirea
Spiraea x bumalda'Goldflame
#2 cont.
13
Plant 4.5' on center
•
MK
'Miss Kim' Lilac
l Syringa patula 'Miss Kim'
Viburnum trilobum'Bailey Compact'
TOTAL SHRUBS
#5 cont.
#5 cont.
6
8
34
Plant 6' on center
Plant 8' on center
•
VB
Compact American Vibumum
•
KF
'Karl Foerster' Calama•rostis Calama•rostis x acutiflora'K. F.' 1 gal. 9
Plant 3' on center
•
RG
'Goldsturm Rudbeckia Rudbeckia'Goldsturm' 1 gal.
15
Plant 2' on center
TOTAL PERENNIALS
24
PLANTING NOTES:
Contractor shall provide a one year guarantee on all plant materials. The guarantee begins on the
date of the Landscape Architect's or Owner's written acceptance of the initial planting. Replacement
plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commenting upon planting.
The Owner shall be responsible for maintenance after the Owner's acceptance of the work.
All plants are to be northern grown and hardy.
Plants to be installed as per standard MN planting practices.
Use existing. indigenous soil for backfill material in tree planting holes and pulverized topsoil for
backfill material material in shrub planting holes, see planting details for depths. Use a soil mix of
1 -1 -1 (puNenzed topsoil, sand, peat moss) for perennial beds, installed at a minimum depth of 12 ".
II is the Contractor's responsibility to verify locations with all utilities prior to any site work including:
grading, installation of plants and irrigation system.
All sod areas shall be irrigated with an automated underground sprinkler system. All additional
landscaped areas shall be irrigated with either spray heads or with 'leaky pipe', as appropriate to the
plant type. Seeded areas do not require irrigation.
Staking of trees is optional although the Lanscepe Contractor is responsible to reposition any trees
that are not plumb within the one year warranty period.
Wrap all smooth- barked trees and fasten at top and bottom. Remove by April 1.
Open top of buriap on BB materials, remove pot from potted plants and gently loosen roots if needed.
Prune plants as necessary per standard nursery practice.
Plants shall be immediately planted upon arrival at site. Propedy heel in material B necessary
(temporary only).
All disturbed areas are to be either sodded or seeded as noted. Sod shall be northern grown and
hardy. A 4" (depth) layer of topsoil shall be installed in all areas to be sodded.
Planting beds for shrubs and perennials shall have 5.5" (vertical) black poly edging (commercial
grade), weed barrier fabric or poly barrier and mulch. The edging shall be placed and staked with
smooth curves. See landscape plan(s) for depth and type of mulch.
Shredded hardwood mulch shall be provided around all installed trees at a depth of 4" and a diameter
of 4' (min .).
SOD / SEEDING & IRRIGATION NOTES:
All disturbed areas are to be either sodded or seeded as noted on the landscape plan(s).
• Sod shall be northern grown and hardy. A 4" (depth) layer of pulverized topsoil shall be incorporated
into all areas to be sodded by mtotilling and grading smooth.
• Sod areas and landscaped areas (including berms) are to be irrigated with an automated imtgation
system. An "As- Built" plan shall be provided to the Owner at completion of system installation.
• Areas disturbed by site work/grading (berms and level areas) shall be seeded with Lino Lakes, City
designated native seed mix for upland soils.
' Pond edges (4:1 slopes) shalt be seeded with Lino Lakes, City designated native seed mix for
wetland soils.
Seeded areas must be installed and maintained to maturity (3-5 years) by a City approved
contractor.
•
ss�
3/4" diameter limestone mulch, oveil6 mil poly
'Jfit *Cate*
Notes:
JAN 0 - 20 06
' Hand loosen mots olwnaherized maferal.
' Remove burlap Imre lop of B &B material,
' Snarly bottom and sides of hole prior 0 planting.
' Water tree, amp to remove an pockets.
• Use Basting Indigenous sod as bac(tdl soil.
'the the Contractors opinn to sake bees, however, the Contractor is
responsible la maintaining trees in a plumb position Throughout the
warranty period.
[tube strand 14 gauge wire, oral
pMrpropyare aplelhylene strap,
45 041.1 t/7 wide around bunk
Tree wrap to fast branch
Cut Mme at trunk, put burlap away
from tip of motet and plate top of
motall nosh with existing grade
Shredded hardwood mulch
@4'depth
Grourmmver (see see landscape
plan for type)
/pinball
Backfill with edgng 004,11ou
Typical Deciduous Tree Planting Detail
Set football on undisturbed
subgrade
Undisturbed subgrade
Not to Scale
Notes:
'Remove burapkan tip of BBB material.
• Scatty bottom and saes of hole prior to panting.
• Water tree. tamp to remove air pockets,
'the existing indigenous son as backfill sod.
' Do on pace mulch in contact with the tree trunk.
• his the Contractors option to sake trees: however, the Contractor 's
responsble for maintaining lanes in a plumb position throughout the
warranty period.
Typical Coniferous Tree Planting Detail
Not to Scale
Double strand 14 gauge wife
Poyproptere a pdyeth/lee
strap, 45 nil, 1 17 wee (1 n.(
Cut Wine ettunk, pWl bulp
away from lop d raomall and
place top of metal nushwilh
50009 grade
Shredded hardwood ms0
t4' depth
rxoundcover (see site landscape
pan /urea)
Rodbell
Backbit with eaetir5 indigenous
soli
Set moOdl co undisturbed
subgrade
— Undisturbed subgrade
N
J f—
O 0')
oz
0O
W ~ w
cc IIY
I—OJ
W O 2
<0
p O
_Da
� Q
Of
CCK
DRAWN
CCK
PRMM r
1650.001
11/10/05
Cl .3
7
,E•
CuTCH CH Cp
,
X7000,17
COVERAGE
POSSIBLE
FUTURE
BUILDING
H il)FPNT
CO ,EPAGE
BUS TURNINC
KruTMENT
H
rmmtr
111 111Y1 1111
/
F: 251:f 00
HYDRANT
COVEPAGE
GA
if-
o
LEGEND
DUI. 7,1C PRuP0.3E0
CuU000, ll■uf
L.G0
iENTEU010
EGBiruCa CUE
CtRe 0 0070
000,000 ,Gelf 0-.—
00,0000 'afte ouw
00,0EAD ELE,P■C — — — —
10CEGG0,1t10 ELECT, — — — —
LIGHT POLE
,VIER uceu, -e-
q0IVEC7.0000 047. uG
0000000 re, 000: — — ro —
00FHEAV TELEF.. — — — eT —
00EGGROUt0 TELP001E
504000 GIRNI40LC 0 •
Careu BaSIN 0 •
Cb014 C00 00400E
31,00 vaunOLC •
reRFED ENE •
0.4% vALVE
FIRE CF■00
ViRTEEMAN
64,
JANOT 2006
LA K
0
o
cr)
z
Lt) Z Z
< w
Z
00 LJLJ
0
<0
CC
>
0z
1—
OE
Z
y
D
mcc
5
JAL JAL
1650 001
11/11/05
C1.9
TWINE OR 1MRE
POINT A MUST BE
HIGHER THAN POINT B TWO 2" X 2" WOOD STAKES OR REINF.
BARS IN EACH BALE AND EMBEDDED
IN GROUND 10" MINIMUM.
BALES PLACED ON
EDGE. BUTTED TIGHT
3" EARTH. FILL
FLOW
STAKE
STD. 1.33 LBS. PER FT.
METAL FENCE POST - 6' LONG
;SNOW FENCE
SPACING FOR
BALE DITCH CHECKS
OPTION 1 BALE HAY OR STRAW DITCH CHECK OPTION 2
TO BE USED WITH SNOW FENCE AT LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHEETS
ALSO TO BE USED WITH OR WITHOUT SNOW FENCE AT OTHER LOCATIONS AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
% GRADE
SPACING
2%
100'
61E
B%
7
40
10%
25
BALE HAY OR
STRAW DITCH CHECK
MLSE No. 480TR
MACE RIPRAP AROUND SIDES
MO OVER TOP OF F.E.S.
SEE KW 181
FOR RIPRA OCTAL
MONO 10EAT8E FARE
REWIRED OLDER WRAP
HAND KACD1 RIPRAP I MOT DEEP
INOPAWAL STONES SNAIL NOT WBW
0055 THAN 50 PAN05 0AO1 =PT
THOSE MD FOR DIN/0/16.
1E UST 3 AMTS ON &LET AND OWET. F NO
APRON 8 05E0 19 THE UST 3 5CRON5
OF PPE ON BPI INLETS AND COILED
ILA 2 1E DOLT FASTENERS 90 ANT
INSTALLED AT 60 FROM TOP 50 BOTTOM
OF PPE
UM 5/8 1E FOR PPE 502E5 TY TO 2Y.
WE 3/4' RE FOR PIPE 9205 30' 10 66'.
IRE 1' 1E KR PPE SIR OVER 7Y.
NM AND WASHED ARE NOT REARED ON
PIPE 92E LESS THAN 20.
TRASH WARDS ND BE REARED ON 18 OR
LARGER PIPE N PACE OF IRASI GUARDS
ENERGY �4� IMNNOT STANDARD
PATE 9E 80 PPE U9D 9/ {{,,
21'142' 31'4 P
4810 7Y 1 -1/4' 1Y
1
e'WAx
T
PR040E 3 CUPS TO AS1EN TRASH GUARD TO RES.
HOT OP GAVAN0E AFTER FABRICA1014.
COMP RM/PI8P0O,
10 70 24' 810 12 CI CL3
20 To 33' 14 TO 20 CT O-.3
36'1048' 23 TO 38 CY CL3
54' MID UP 52 CI IMO IP CIA
(ONE OBIC YARD 8 APPOO MA1ECY 2A00 ER.)
5150
FILTIP 8ANXE RGEOR %IE FILTER T E R E
O
IR1
UNDER F OR 2 LAMS
OF WAFT 500 0 FABRIC
OR EQUA L
FLIER BANET (1N0OT 3601291)
DEOTECRE FILTER 119E N
• 5412 sgV<0.3ipa.
MIN 12' WROTH
898.5100 1R ELEV.
897.5 -FA FV,
896.5 -50 Fv.
807104
ELEV
2' 2" PRESSURE
F3 TREAD
L EI FM. 4898.0
2' PRESSURE
TREATED BOARDS
u
LJ MIN. 6" X 6"
PRESSURE TREATED POSTS
4' MIN. BURY
NOTE: STAINLESS STEEL
BOLTS REQUIRED
Will if ILTOE8 3FA841CHED ROCK
CUSS II RIPRAP k-
W/ FILTER FABRIC
8"
2' MIN. EMBEDMENT
FROM TOP OF BOARD
Date: 09/7/04
POND OUTLET
BAFFLE
MLSE No. 449
s1
NO SCALE
WASHED
PUN MEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP
w'""95
PUN NEW OF PERPENDICULAR RM.P
PWAW APsTmas,
Oa
DTlsaw W iwlwrWwl.
COME SPACING
PAM na
DONE SECTION
FLARED END SECTION
WITH TRASH GUARD
MLSE No. 480
RIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS
MLSE No. 481
ROCK CONSTRUCTION,
ENTRANCE
MLSE No. 510
CATCH BASIN.
SEDIMENT FILTER
MLSE No. 406
MNDOT STANDARD
HANDICAP RAMP
MLSE N. 780
EAPIM9W
JON1 8 FILLER
CURE TYPE VANES
Y01104 W
GUTTER CNC
NEENNI R -3245 ORME
pp.PN EAAREA - TT11ppTYEPE
WTTER
A 6
TRM191p1 SECTION
DPANSI FILLER
EMMEN
EF
NOTES:
I . 54' THRU 121' DIA. STRUCTURES ARE
NAMEACTNED ANTI MIL END
FAONC 001W.
2. STRUCTURES ARE 11N8FACRWED
N ACCORDANCE *1114 4512 0-478
AND 4418101 STANDARD PUTT 400
NTH R1N6D1 GASKET JOINTS
}
PROVIDE MORTAR RIFTS TO FR
TIE BOTTOM PORTICO( OF PPE 10
DIRECT FLOW TO OUTLET.
4. MAER SLAB DF9O1
VARIES NTH CASING
5. RETi08021G STEEL 91AU.
E PER ASIA C -478 NO
I1001 RAE 4005.
04101 BAS( 51RUIRE
CATCH BASIN PLAN
--lBl- A - --►181—.—
VARIES
PRECAST ''. OVER972 ME
FOB PPE OPTIONS
108010
num.
/ / / // /// _. IrLUT /l/,
C
MOO
NAbW MOVER. ROPE OAP
10125. F® W IN00
A
DISC ANCHORED (1. WRa
R/W
nR cawlE nw
ilia poi 3]60 iAa C R. N. NW COME
O WF-OOi 1W4 TYO A0 40 4 OIINWi
— �uOnAKO v AmpaP.TE RA;
—.• eA¢WMn RIP
11PWOE ToINmIeN STREET CROSS SECTOR — a Ruw.T
POT TO SCALE
RPM Y WARMS SMAN
FS AMA
LAICJIALIIIINALIELCIE
48" DRAM. & LARGER
MLSE No. 426
TYPICAL COMMFRICAI
STREET CROSS — SECTION MLSE No. 429C
1/2' MORTAR ON OUTSIDE.
BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING &
CATCH BASIN. FINISH
SMOOTH ON INSIDE.
140 MORTAR ON INSIDE.
REMOVE CURB
BOX BOLTS
RINGS (3 MIN., 1.0'
MAX. OF RINGS B
MORTAR).
03/10/00
VAR.
(4' MIN,)
VARIABLE
'INFI- SHIELD' SEAL
OR EQUAL
PRECAST COVER SLAB
SE LEON SLAB JOINTS.
CEMENT MORTAR
PRECAST BASE
MH SLAB
DIA. THICKNESS
mIMF1111•1
NO WOOD SHALL BE MOD VTR ADJUSINO CASTING: CERRO MORTAR ONLY,
CAST IRON FRAME E: GRATE CASTOR PER SPECIRCA.IIONS.
HOETSTEPS 5AN11 BE CAST 041. AUMINW OR STEEL REINFORCED PIASIIC PER
COO. LOCATION SHALL BE AS NOTED N THE SPECINCARONS.
PRECAST ...CEO CONCRETE RASE SUB W COYER SUB PER ASIAN Care,
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE MORONS PER ARTA 047*,
OR 8• CONCRETE MMRIOE 8.000 WREN 1/2• MORTARED EXIEDOR.
FURNISH PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS WITH O-RING GASNE15 k
W8RACANT EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPEOREL.
FILL OPENING BETWEEN 192 AND MANHOLE WALL NMI CEMENT MORTAR.
INSIDE SURFACE SHALL RE FNASHEO SAW..
• 858140RA.1E0 PIPE 05 PESER 0 UA IO 00010 110 0140 00140'PDRIIL
STANDARD DRAWING
140.
.0 UKES
5' METAL OR 2'021144000 FENCE POST
GEO1EXTILE WITH NET
BACKING
020120TILE TO
OVERLAP THROUGH
TRENCH.
6, 00.
NOTE : -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO
MNDOT 3886, TYPE B.
- FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS
OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
4/23/97
STANDARD DRAWING
N0.
4/24/97
CAT
ITN KES
STANDARD DRAWING
140.
ON
O
F-•Z
�O2
cc rx
pp
o
�A3Uj
I-O
J
—O-
M<
DETAILS SHEET
DEMAD
JAL
JAL
1850`001
OAR
11/11/05
C2.0
-J
O
H0 i-
Z \� W
a =
Aix y
Po
PROACT
oa
JAL JAL
1650.001
11/11/05
C2.1
P0N0 BANK
EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
(WIDTH VARIES)
170141) BANK
2" X 2" HARDWOOD
MARKER W/SPIKE.
-s' METAL FENCE
P05T NARKS
PAINTED GREEN
-urn 'u r'
GRANULAR BEDDNG
MATERIAL (COMPACTED)
RISER
2' x
2" HARDWOOD
MARKER W /SPIKE.
45' BEND
6' METAL FENCE
POST MARKER
PAINTED GREEN
PLAIN
40 MIN.
.III °III -11 EI1 �I
UNDISTURBED
SOIL
CLASS III RIPRAP
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
DEPTHS GREATER THAN
14' WHERE RISER APPROVED
BY ENGINEER.
4' OVERFLOW
OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS
NOT TO SCALE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (RIPRAP) MLSE No. 440
TYPE B -618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER
TYPE B -618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER MLSE No. 705
5/25/00
45'
AIRTIGHT
PLUG OR
CAP
45' BEND
GRANULAR BEDDING
MATERIAL (COMPACTED)
SERVICE WYE TO BE
EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE
NOTE: SERVICE PIPE TO BE PVC.
5CH. 40 (ASTM 0- 2685).
SOLVENT WELD ALL MACS.
NOTE
COVER NTTINGS WITH PLASTIC
(4 MIL) PRIOR TO POURING
CONCRETE
4/24/97
UNDISTURBED
STANDARD DRAWING
N0.
ELLYATICN
(FOR BENDS)
2500 PS. CONCRETE
28 DAY STRENGTH
STANDARD DRAWING
N0.
4/24/97
RAN
(FOR TEES AND CROSSES)
SECTION
NOTE:
COVER FIRINGS WITH
POLYETHYLENE (MAIL.)
PRIOR TO POURING
CONCRETE.
2500 PS.I. CONCRETE
28 DAY STRENGTH
0.D. +2'
COMPACTED BACKALL
COMPACTED
SAND OR PR
RUN GRANULAR
MATERIAL
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
4/8/97
IIII
IIII. eO�¢µ1 IIII
• III' yry.M .„
• y 1s �GR.Cii "nY41IIlI
GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING
STANDARD DRAWING
NO.
O.%
0.D/4 (4" MIN)
STANDARD DRAWING
N0.
WATERMAN SIZE VARIES
4/8/97
TEE
COVER AS
SPECIFIED
CURB
GATE VALVE BOX
CATE VALVE
1 1/2' WASHED ROCK ALL
AROUND. MIN.1 /3 C.Y.
(MM. 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS 5011.5)
8'98"X19 CONC. BLACK
E RODS
101000 3733 TYPE 3
0501500115 FABRIC
MIN. 1 LAYER
ATTACH TO TOP OF BONNET
STANDARD DRAWING
N0.
SANG OR PR
2
RUN GRANULAR TIIIIy
BEDDING ANO LILL - 0'1)/4
�� MA 8441 1�IIMIIIIinl1111M11111®IIIII0�
GRAMMAR MATERIAL ENCASEMENT
4/8/97
CONCRETE CRADLE
STANDARD DRAWING
N0.
3/4" GALVANIZED
EEL TIE RODS
OR 'MEGA LUG' BRAND THRUST
RETAINER GLANDS AT JOINTS
SEE STD. DWG. 203
WAMMAN
HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
& BOX
VARIES
4'
WELD CONDUCTIVITY
STUD 2" BELOW FLANGE
PURPOSES)roN
GEOTEX1KE FABRIC
NNDOT 3733
TYPE 3
CONCRETE
BLOCK
REACTION
BACKING
4/24/97
(VALVE IN BOULEVARD)
0.1).42'
1 1/2" WASHED
ROCK ALL
AROUND
MIN. 1/3 C.Y.
(MIN. 1 L.Y. IN
IMPERVIOUS
SOILS)
STANDARD DRAWING
N0.
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
• A5TIA D2321
EMBEDMENT MATE
(SEE SPEC.)
PIPE INSTALLATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH AVM D 2321, TABLE 2.
'L O.0/4 (4" MIN)
• EMBEDMENT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO 45TH 02321, TABLE 1.
12/19/97
(FOR PVC PIPE)
STANDARD DRAWING
N0.
NEW FACILITY FOR:
MIDSTATES TIRE AND TOOL, INC.
LINO LAKES
SHEET INDEX
SHEET SHEET TITLE
COVER
C1.0 GRADING /DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C1.1 UTILITY PLAN
C2.0 DETAILS
S1.0 FOUNDATION PLAN (UPPER)
S1.1 FOUNDATION PLAN (LOWER) AND PIER DETAILS
S2.0 PIER DETAILS AND FOUNDATION DETAILS
S2.1 FOUNDATION DETAILS
A1.0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN (UPPER)
A1.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN (LOWER), MEZZANINE PLAN, AND REFLECTED CEILING PLANS
A2.0 ELEVATIONS
A3.0 SECTIONS
A3.1 SECTIONS
A3.2 SECTIONS
A4.0 SCHEDULES AND DETAILS
A4.1 DETAILS
C51 FORMAT DRAWING KEY
SHEET TYPE
SERIES
PLANS
ELEVATIONS
SECTIONS
DETAILS /SCHEDULES
2
4
SYMBOLS & KEYS
Ci - - - -- COLUMN GRID
DETAIL
SCALE: W — 7' —o
�XXXX
ELEV: 003 —XX
IECTICO1 .001
BUILDING SECTION
REFERENCE
SECTION MIL DE FOUND
CCM 1.1101
DETAIL IDENTFICATON
FOUND SKET SUN.
DUAL 1.001
SKr NM. ON 10101
SEUL IV
PLAN DETAIL
REFERENCE
111 DET/11.
ELEVATION MARKER
REVISION
DOOR IDENTIFICATION
WINDOW IDENTIFICATION
ROOM IDENTIFICATION
KEY NOTE IDENTIFICATION
NEW MASONRY WALL
NEW STUD WALL
EXISTING WALL TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING WALL TO
RE/MIN
PROJECT INFORMATION
MINNESOTA
BUILDING CODE: IBC 2000
BUILDING SIZE
FIRST FLOOR AREA (50. R.1:
MEZZANINE AREA (55. FT.):
NUMBER OF STORIES'.
EAVE HEIGHT.
MAXIMUM OVERALL HEIGHT:
CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION
30,870
1,840
15, -0'
22' -0'
TYPE 118
OCCUPANCY
5 -I
LOCATION MAP
DESIGN LOADS, PER IBC 2000, CHAPTER 16
Pg =
BASIC WIND SPEED -
WIND EXPOSURE =
SEISMIC CATEGORY
SOIL BEARING PRESSURE _
50 PSF
90 MPH
A
2000 PSF PRESUMED
FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - REQUIRED
STANDPIPE SYSTEMS - NOT REQUIRED SEE IBC 905
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM - NOT REQUIRED SEE IBC 907
SMOKE DETECTORS - INSTALL PER APPLICABLE CODES
EXIT SONS - PROVIDE EXIT SIGNS PER IBC 1003.2,10
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS - INSTALL PER WC AND APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES
APOLLO BUSINESS PAR
UNO LAKES. MN
GENERAL NOTES
THESE PLANS ARE PRESENTED TO LEAD A HIGH DUALITY DESIGN /BUILD TEAM,
EACH CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE EXCELLENT
BUILDING MATERIALS AND CRAFTSMANSHIP WHICH WE CAN ALL BE PROUD OF. WE
ENCOURAGE YOU TO PROVIDE EXPERTISE IN YOUR CHOSEN FIELD AND TO BRING
IDEAS AND CONCERNS TO THE ATTENTI05 OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.
THESE DRAWINGS COVER STRUCTURAL AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY. ALL
WORK SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD PRACTICES AND APPUCABLE LAWS,
WHETHER THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY STATED IN THESE PLANS OR NOT.
EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL:
— VISR THE SITE TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS. ACCESS, ETC. PRIOR TO
BIDDING
— MAINTAIN A CLEAN J08 SITE AT ALL nuts.
— OBTAIN AND PAY FOR PERMITS, LICENSES, FEES, ETC. AS MAY BE REQUIRED
FOR COMPLETION OF HIS OWN PORTION OF THE PROJECT.
— FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS.
— REPORT ANY DISCREPANCY NOTED BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND APPLICABLE
CODES TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR
— PROVIDE All BARRIERS. FENCES. SAFETY EQUIPMENT AND PRECAUTIONS
REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAWS AND STANDARD PRACTICES.
ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS.
ANY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ENCOUNTERED DURING DEMOLITION, REMODELING, OR
EXCAVATION 51uL1 BE REMOVED AND /0R CONTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNING LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
THIS DESIGN, THESE DRAWING, AND INCLUDED DETAILS ARE THE COPYRIGHTED
PROPERTY OF INTEGRITY ENGINEERING & DESIGN, LLC. NO PART SHALL BE
COPIED. DISTRIBUTED, OR MADE AVAILABLE TO ANYONE WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
WRITTEN CONSENT OF INTEGRITY ENGINEERING & DESIGN, LLC.
QUICK SPEC
TO MAKE THIS PLAN MORE CONTRACTOR FRIENDLY, WE HAVE PREPARED IT 31111
OUR TACK SPEQ SYSTEM.
THE WRITTEN SPEC 15 GENERAL AND DOES NOT GO INTO DEPTH TO REITERATE
STANDARD PRACTICES OR APPUCABIE LAWS. IT IS WRITTEN IN AN EASY TO READ
FORMAT. THE SPECIFICATIONS SPLIT INTO APPROPRIATE SECTIONS AND LISTED
ON THE PLAN WHERE IT 15 NEEDED. YOU WILL FIND THESE SECTIONS QUICKLY BY
THE SHADOW BOX AROUND IT (SIMILAR TO THIS ONE).
SPECIFIC CASES THAT CANNOT BE DESCRIBED IN A GENERAL SPEC ARE NOTED
ON THE PLANS. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PLAN AN0 THE
GENERAL SPEC. THE PLAN NOTES WILL SUPERSEDE THE GENERAL SPEC.
CALL 3 WORK DAYS
BEFORE YOU DIG
DIGGERS ® HOTLIn
(800) 242-8511
FAX ( 3B &3800
WEBSITE.1ww.ramerraTotlioe.com
A DESIGN / BUILD PROJECT BY:
Keller
TM PLANNERS I ARCHITECTS I BUILDERS
DESIGN / BUILD
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
920 - 766 -5795 WATS:1- 800 - 236 -2534
P.O. BOX 620 N216 STATE ROAD "55"
KAUKAUNA, WISCONSIN 54130 -0620
Keller
PLANNERS 1 ARCHITECTS !BUILDERS
MOM
•
1.011E mums>.
rAY 2111.47.17.110
Z
•
"COPYRIGHT NOTICE"
11 .O.W.. comp one
FeP.NN.a PeP."Y ., I¢uEN. INC
="...‘ """ •KN.
"NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
Inlonno. about 0. own mow.
%ran a
nw.1 w "D1R1wt�""h owe
•
O
0
■
z
W
H
a
6-0
MINNESOTA
LINO LAKES,
REVISIONS
.
PROJECT MANAGER:
ARCHITECT:
DRAWN BY:
EXPEDITOR:
M. CA5HMAN
5. KLESSIG
G. HOHN
SUPERVISOR:
PRELIMINARY N0:
CONTRACT N0:
LED. /
05056
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION:
01/05/06
SHEET:
11
»
Me.
>
w-•
60' 0 061
RETAINI0 YyJl
CATCH
BASIN
VIIFY
510E SLOPE
RETAINING WALL
TOP 0
PO_0_FL00.
(Th
z
FOR CAR SHOP
SHEET A1.0
NATCHUNE— -
SHEET 01.1
9 OH DOOR
669 OH 000
�TOP 00 01000
ELE'V: 100-0
1 t'6o9 OH 000
CID
(STORAGE UNDER
12' -0' HIGH)
12612 OH DOOR ".1:
,
`l.44 jV f
SHEET 01.0
MATCHUNE
SHEET A1.1
ARMS PERM. WELLS
ru 60 TOM woo 66105 LIMY Dr Re gnu ME
Ms. wwxc .ws
• q'm▪ 'D. woo sws OR r FOR LILT. aroE.
CS TS MIMED WES Of .5.5 M.I.6 PRO. UP.. JOSIO 41.
FOR LO. ROM
ORM. Ro ..,
a4N¢awnoR1 1.05x6
WSW ARROW. A. 711I VIPS. CONSTRECTION MOON, AS MUSED 57 LW.
STATES OM. MOW, MN. 00.031. Jaws AS SMARM
FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 5 ..l.—Er
WALL TYPE -
Xo-- SEE WALL 1160 SCHEDULE
ON SHEET _
WC mR""a'ia.R. PROc['a"PRO. ervc'".¢aipiw mm E""ww�"ir.""�ws 11.001. d"� .
WAR SC WON MOONED OR 141305 70
MIL. .cmm"wc 1'"o'luia wuvmOMiu"S..0 BECOME ery
comn6o wino.
0M1155 ID DA. OR NOMER LOLL WET Trt WS. 005.0.75 OF •5111
ALL owe 10 04.0 DORM 170.1. 11/.. ROMISOKI RN, TPIE
11150AIROMTS OF AMY MN. DIME orrOl• MOM YIELD or wcoo PSI.
pp
.nn% M6.wa 6w _.um,
KU. OR (I) Nam 0 N r 0M'� SEWELL NW. LINIEDS • SUP 17V.SE AT TIE TOR OF ME PROMO 4P 1..
M TOP Of 113.1 MOST 1.11T.S. STUDS 24.11 DISOLLED PER VMS. CON5111.7.
AS ORAL • mnmx.
sTuo mow
A'
.1. MINTS Nm MOO ....E0 .e..o of(1) D,a or oxx.i D. 6n0.
•
WALL TYPE SCHEDULE
N0.
VERBAL DESCRIPTION
WALL DIAGRAM
1
r CIAO WITH HORIZONTAL LADDER
REINFORCING AT 16' 0.C. PER SPEC
FOAM IN PLACE INSULATION
316• METAL STUDS AT 16. 0.C. WTTH
SVV BAR INSULATION
r GYP. BOARD
HEIGHT: FULL
AI
,
�.6•
L
Imo: ✓
L:
�j
it
...;
2
8' CMU WITH HORIZONTAL LADDER
REINFORCING AT 16. 0.C. PER SPEC
FOAM IN PLACE INSULATION
FIJI-I-
4
In
raiHEIGHT:
✓
S
Y.• GYP.
346• METAL STUD WITH BATT
INSULATION FOR SOUND
)5 GYP.
HEIGHT: FULL
1�,1
1
�Y
Veso
C•
A►
C��n
k./
I=
4
$ GYP.
6 INSULATOR FOR SOUND
R 006.
HEIGHT: FULL
!' —i
Opii
►I
N.
If
•
Keller
PLANNERS I ARCHITECTS I BUILDERS
.10 Stais Av. 55
•
" VS 53022
NOME 9D.2easno
MINNESOTA
5
O
2
"COPYRIGHT NOTICE"
x<..0..R a1a I, x.
MA01100 orwErty Mae NC.
diatal 150. o..,.. . 0raL6 "r— �" on ,.
"NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
..x101 i¢uiN lxc
. 0 wxan.a
REVISIONS
PROJECT MANAGER:
ARCHITECT:
DRAWN BY:
EXPEDITOR:
M. CASHMAN
5. KLESSI0
G. HORN
SUPERW50R:
PRELIMINARY N0:
CONTRACT N0:
05086
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTC61:
01/05/06
SHEET:
•
A1.0
A1.0
JNE
A1.1
._X -BRACE T
(STORE UNDER
12' -0• HIGH)
f�TOP OVELEV 166 " -G' --
X -BRACE
oonassan EAMON N.7m. NK SSAS aft wow SILOS FA. f RM .. SRm Bs.. SW S
M1iS�SA' Amm"ao OMB ON S' Ep u".0 Ens
uOESO MEMO 17.7177.. MN. Moos."im Sm X, iCC Doino FOR Arm M
N
OYLI m�
ORM. Soul me Toe MPLICOON A.�.Em .EMmN�.HLN .7N.°
SHEET A1.0
IJATCHUNE
SHEET AI.1
X -BRACE
13�
FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: J .,1' -O•
N�S
WALL TYPE -
%p-- SEE WALL TYPE SCHEDULE
ON SHEET —
art ."w "m •e NO py WNW. Su1LL SS s at .LESS
oat mow soul ▪ amMi : IMS S Snac Sri. . 790. N.v. u.» SO ASS LOW OSOCE arosa MOM SO. OOKOSE TO 719 AMA SNSOF.71. 19
COME. SELO.
SLOUI.Orrs OFIA AMP ORME WV. A MOUE OM Of Woo ESL
As. Lam MET 6 SCREE
WOW sm. mid 1.999)
WO. ST.S SoLL MCONION: DE 74. DELON 00. AS Mal. CO 71. BANS
SILOS 9.1 117 SWAM 70 Ma NM imam TM. 71) SORON or EMS
NOM NOME NOM TIO. IS MD.. rrt 7. 7. Of OF WM MOMS SUP MON
11GLm
• 0
as
u r m•-r
MOE 1¢.7775 ME MSID .. VMS W SW ON[ (1) L W OF IMw.I INN ME
6' -0• DEMOUNTABLE
RAILING SECTION
.TOP OF1 FLOOR
V ELEV: 110' -11"
Mit
•
MEZZANINE PLAN
SCALE rwl. -0"
1:::
......
Iiii
•
FWI H OOR
1 -
HATCH PATTERN SCHEDULE
e•x8• SPLIT FACE BLOCK
COLORED WITH DRYBLOCK
AND (2) COATS SEALER
8k16• SPLIT FACE BLOCK
COLORED WITH DRYBLOCK
AND (2) COATS SEALER
EIFS 1
EIFS 2
8 x15" FLUTED BLOCK
COLORED WITH DRYBLOCK
AND (2) COATS SEALER
BNB" FLUTED BLOCK
COLORED WITH DRYBLOCK
AND (2) COATS SEALER
STANDING
SEAM ROOF
SYSTEM
FINISH
ELEV: 100
2.089 S.F. EXTERIOR INSULATION SYSTEM - (545)
3.900 S.F. TOTAL AREA - (1005)
DOWNSPOUT
TYP.
1.017 S.F. EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SroILM - (565)
1,824 S.F. TOTAL AREA - (1005)
TYP
C:J
MTN CIO. OIL VMS VALI. SE LBO IN RUNS. KM IALESs. ONERVBC PURIM Me
MCC TOOL JOINTS CONDOS FOR %%MCP IIONTNESS. 0.11PPLO. 00.01, MO NOM
1.11VIS Per RDNIDACINO S. WY BE ant NIS OR. SO
wawa,. nea gnaw. (rrn) WNW. BC INV PSI NSW.
PLC CORM Of INSOMPre UNDLR L WA RR LSE MS STWWATO MUSS
NOM OTOWNSS ON OE COVOR SACK NA= CONNO APR ORS AND A7 WSW TO LAMM WO.. WRNS WC
61.C. SWillec DOS WILL NW TO PROWNT ONIONSSCRICE.
so▪ wiLwrowo
S WAN 3A' 93..3' MOOR SY% AT 4.4 ON alum rN ALL 931800 -TruT9
MON WO A7 TOR OF ONSOWer
MULL Brrox-0-1ARRES 7111w-WAX, NAMING ST II0110. WNW OF Mat MOW
URTIS. ARO NM SIGNO EFAIS. NSW. 11S. ONO COMB ROPE WM NOM 22i
COWER ALL 110.-.1 WROINS.
GORNERS. N-97 BLOCS COSMIC JOINTS ON COE UDC Cr OPSNWOS ISIOL OR MS MD
TIC SNOB SINT SWAN PALM or [ROO( MIS AS RSCWISED.
RP
WILES NOM COMM. S .WN A 2919311
Or 2.0 ▪ USA, WNW a Tnuw T17.1 miB MAWA
WWI R-AINIE POW. COLON AS WAS= 7Nr DINA
MN la if. Ce. INWARD. WARD. SMALL PAOLO. FORIDWFULLY. WWI JOINS
ONXIXES AI ALL SOM. NORM IISOLSOCO wwwww lo PRUDE Waal TO All.Y.3017
ANDS. Maui Twain ROM
1,858 S.F. EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH
(5•5)
3.325 S.F. TOTAL AREA - (1005)
WEST ELEVATION
ABUTTING PROP. ZONED RES.
SCALE: )I••1• -0.
0
575 S.F. EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH Sr0ltM - (299)
1,954 S.F. TOTAL AREA - (1005)
IMF
C.J
C.
C.J.
SOUTH ELEVATION (FRONT)
SCALE: )C ■1' -O•
—J2-11/2
2,153 S.F. EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH 000/29 - (555
3,900 S.F. TOTAL AREA - (1005)
NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1j• -1' -0'
INISH 00 F�O
1 -ORAA
00'V
reac:�u,
H
LEV: 100 - 00 0
FINISH 1 520
00
`- DOWNSPOUT
TYP.
FINISH F 00
FINISI
ELEV: 1
Keller
PLANNERS I ARCHITECTS I BUILDERS
MILWAUSSI
Owinen.ro WW1
FORUM
1,CoRowe HISS
OWNS 041.7116.570
FAN 02.0.706.003.
•
VAR re13•0.271.0
....aolNrowa.o.m
MINNESOTA
LINO LAKES,
"COPYRIGHT NOTICE"
..o trb'P.Rr w ul
ha "`wo.w.
• ros∎ Z. in* ow1o.
-ITT.
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
1"'"93 NWT�10; W _
▪ al MIA G09 mtoOI.
•
REVISIONS
•
PROJECT MANAGER:
ARCHITECT:
DRAWN BY:
EXPEDITOR:
M. CASHMAN
S. KLE550
G. HORN
SUPERVISOR:
FIELD LOCATE BUMPERS PREUMINARY NO
PER MANUFACTURER
DOWNSPOUT
EAST ELEVATION
ABUTTING PROP. ZONED COMM.
SCALE: $•.1' -0•
FINISH FL00RO,
LLEV: 96 -00
CONTRACT N0:
I.E.D. /
05066
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION:
01/05/08
SHEET:
A2.0
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson
MEETING DATE: January 23, 2006
TOPIC: Anoka County Agreement For Residential Recycling
Program /2006
BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes receives SCORE funds each year
from Anoka County. The SCORE funds are used to fund solid waste recycling
programs. Cities using SCORE funds allocated by Anoka County are required to
enter into a cooperative agreement with the County. The 2006 SCORE
allocation of money is based on $4.70 per household or $32,827.90 for the City
of Lino Lakes.
Please find attached copies of the original agreement for your consideration.
The Anoka County Agreements are based on the following:
• The abatement goal will remain constant at 175 pounds per person
per year.
• Anoka County has received the fall SCORE payment and is expecting
to receive a spring SCORE payment. The proposed 2006 municipal
funding of cities ($32,827.90 for Lino Lakes) includes the additional
payment. If the second payment is not received the funding allocation
will be reduced.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve Anoka County Contract #2005 -0300, Agreement For Residential
Recycling Program.
2. Refer back to staff for further review.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and
• moved its adoption:
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -08
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE ANOKA COUNTY AGREEMENT FOR 2006
RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has entered into an agreement with Anoka
County over the years to cooperatively work on Solid Waste abatement and Recycling;
and
WHEREAS, Anoka County receives funding from the Solid Waste
Management Coordinating Board and the State of Minnesota in the form of "SCORE"
funds, and
WHEREAS, Anoka County wishes to assist municipalities in meeting recycling
goals established by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners by providing SCORE
funds to cities in the County for solid waste recycling programs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is eligible to receive $32,827.90 for fiscal
year 2006 in Score funds; and
WHEREAS, Anoka County Agreement No. 2005 -0300 provides for the
cooperative effort between Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
Authorization that the City of Lino Lakes enter into an agreement with Anoka
County (Agreement No. 2005 -0300) Agreement for Residential Recycling Program.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of January, 2006
John Bergeson, Mayor
Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted.
- 3 9 -
•
Anoka County Contract # 2005 -0300
AGREEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on the 13th day of December, 2005,
notwithstanding the date of the signatures of the parties, between the COUNTY OF ANOKA,
State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY ", and the CITY OF LINO LAKES,
hereinafter referred to as the "MUNICIPALITY ".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Anoka County has received $355,100 in funding from the Solid Waste
Management Coordinating Board and the State of Minnesota pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115A.557
(hereinafter "SCORE funds "); and
WHEREAS, Anoka County anticipates receiving an additional $355,100 in SCORE
funds in the spring of 2006; and
WHEREAS, the County wishes to assist the Municipality in meeting recycling goals
established by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners by providing said SCORE funds to
cities and townships in the County for solid waste recycling programs.
• NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained
in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions:
•
1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for cooperation between the
County and the Municipality to implement solid waste recycling programs in the
Municipality.
2. TERM. The term of this Agreement is from January 1, 2006 through December 31,
2006, unless earlier terminated as provided herein.
3. DEFINITIONS.
a. "Problem material" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115A.03,
subdivision 24a.
b. "Multi -unit households" means households within apartment complexes,
condominiums, townhomes, mobile homes and senior housing complexes.
c. "Opportunity to recycle" means providing recycling and curbside pickup or
collection centers for recyclable materials as required by Minn. Stat. § 115A.552.
d. "Recycling" means the process of collecting and preparing recyclable materials
and reusing the materials in their original form or using them in manufacturing
processes that do not cause the destruction of recyclable materials in a manner
that precludes further use.
e. "Recyclable materials" means materials that are separated from mixed municipal
solid waste for the purpose of recycling, including paper, glass, plastics, metals,
fluorescent lamps, major appliances and vehicle batteries.
-40-
•
•
•
g.
Refuse derived fuel or other material that is destroyed by incineration is not a
recyclable material.
"Yard waste" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115A.03,
subdivision 38.
4. PROGRAM. The Municipality shall develop and implement a residential solid waste
recycling program adequate to meet the Municipality's annual recycling goal of 1,638
tons of recyclable materials as established by the County. The Municipality shall ensure
that the recyclable materials collected are delivered to processors or end markets for
recycling.
a. The Municipal recycling program shall include the following components:
i. Each household (including multi -unit households) in the Municipality
shall have the opportunity to recycle at least four broad types of materials,
such as paper, glass, plastic, metal and textiles.
ii. The recycling program shall be operated in compliance with all applicable
federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations.
iii. The Municipality shall implement a public information program that
contains at least the following components:
(1) One promotion is to be mailed to each household focused
exclusively on the Municipality's recycling program;
(2) One promotion advertising recycling opportunities available for
residents is to be included in the Municipality's newsletter or local
newspaper; and
(3) Two community presentations are to be given on recycling.
The public information components listed above must promote the
focused recyclable material of the year as specified by the County. The
County will provide the Municipality with background material on the
focused recyclable material of the year.
iv. The Municipality, on an ongoing basis, shall identify new residents and
provide detailed information on the recycling opportunities available to
these new residents.
b. If the Municipality's recycling program did not achieve the Municipality's
recycling goals as established by the County for the prior calendar year, the
Municipality shall prepare and submit to the County by March 31, 2006, a plan
acceptable to County that is designed to achieve the recycling goals set forth in
this Agreement.
5. REPORTING. The Municipality shall submit the following reports semiannually to the
County no later than July 20, 2006 and January 19, 2007:
a. An accounting of the amount of waste which has been recycled as a result of the
Municipality's activities and the efforts of other community programs, redemption
centers and drop -off centers. For recycling programs, the Municipality shall
certify the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been collected
and the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been marketed. For
recycling programs run by other persons or entities, the Municipality shall also
•
•
•
provide documentation on forms provided by the County showing the tons of
materials that were recycled by the Municipality's residents through these other
programs. The Municipality shall keep detailed records documenting the
disposition of all recyclable materials collected pursuant to this agreement. The
Municipality shall also report the number of cubic yards or tons of yard waste
collected for composting or landspreading, together with a description of the
methodology used for calculations. Any other material removed from the waste
stream by the Municipality, i.e. tires and used oil, shall also be reported
separately.
b. Information regarding any revenue received from sources other than the County
for the Municipality's recycling programs.
c. Copies of all promotional materials that have been prepared by the Municipality
during the term of this Agreement to promote its recycling programs.
The Municipality agrees to furnish the County with additional reports in form and at
frequencies requested by the County for financial evaluation, program management
purposes, and reporting to the State of Minnesota.
6. BILLING AND PAYMENT PROCEDURE. The Municipality shall submit itemized
invoices semiannually to the County for abatement activities no later than July 20, 2006
and January 19, 2007. Costs not billed by January 19, 2007 will not be eligible for
funding. The invoices shall be paid in accordance with standard County procedures,
subject to the approval of the Anoka County Board of Commissioners.
7. ELIGIBILITY FOR FUNDS. The Municipality is entitled to receive reimbursement
for eligible expenses, less revenues or other reimbursement received, for eligible
activities up to the project maximum as computed below, which shall not exceed
$32,827.90. The project maximum for eligible expenses shall be computed as follows:
a. A base amount of $10,000.00 for recycling activities only; and
b. $4.70 per household for recycling activities only.
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, the County reserves the right to reduce the
funding provided hereunder in the event insufficient SCORE funds are available. If the
spring SCORE payment of $355,100 is not received or is reduced, the County may
reduce the project maximum amount payable to the Municipality. The County will
promptly notify the Municipality in the event that the project maximum will be reduced.
8. RECORDS. The Municipality shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in
accordance with requirements of the County and the State of Minnesota. The
Municipality shall maintain strict accountability of all funds and maintain records of all
receipts and disbursements. Such records and accounts shall be maintained in a form
which will permit the tracing of funds and program income to final expenditure. The
Municipality shall maintain records sufficient to reflect that all funds received under this
•
Agreement were expended in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 115A.557, subd. 2, for
residential solid waste recycling purposes. The Municipality shall also maintain records
of the quantities of materials recycled. All records and accounts shall be retained as
provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than five years from the last receipt
of payment from the County pursuant to this Agreement.
9. AUDIT. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, the Municipality shall allow the County or
other persons or agencies authorized by the County, and the State of Minnesota,
including the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor, access to the records of the
Municipality at reasonable hours, including all books, records, documents, and
accounting procedures and practices of the Municipality relevant to the subject matter of
the Agreement, for purposes of audit. In addition, the County shall have access to the
project site(s), if any, at reasonable hours.
10. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. In performing the provisions of this Agreement, both parties agree to comply with
all applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations or
standards established by any agency or special governmental unit which are now
or hereafter promulgated insofar as they relate to performance of the provisions of
this Agreement. In addition, the Municipality shall comply with all applicable
requirements of the State of Minnesota for the use of SCORE funds provided to
the Municipality by the County under this Agreement.
b. No person shall illegally, on the grounds of race, creed, color, religion, sex,
marital status, public assistance status, sexual preference, handicap, age or
national origin, be excluded from full employment rights in, participation in, be
denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to unlawful discrimination under
any program, service or activity hereunder. The Municipality agrees to take
affirmative action so that applicants and employees are treated equally with
respect to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment,
layoff, termination, selection for training, rates of pay, and other forms of
compensation.
c. The Municipality shall be responsible for the performance of all subcontracts and
shall ensure that the subcontractors perform fully the terms of the subcontract.
The Agreement between the Municipality and a subcontractor shall obligate the
subcontractor to comply fully with the terms of this Agreement.
d. The Municipality agrees that the Municipality's employees and subcontractor's
employees who provide services under this agreement and who fall within any job
classification established and published by the Minnesota Department of Labor &
Industry shall be paid, at a minimum, the prevailing wages rates as certified by
said Department.
•
•
e. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement is contained herein and that
this Agreement supersedes all oral and written agreements and negotiations
between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.
f. Any amendments, alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of this
Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing, duly
signed by the parties.
g.
Contracts let and purchases made under this Agreement shall be made by the
Municipality in conformance with all laws, rules, and regulations applicable to the
Municipality.
h. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section,
subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to
be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining portion of this
Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating the relationship of co-
partners, joint venturers, or an association between the County and Municipality,
nor shall the Municipality, its employees, agents or representatives be considered
employees, agents, or representatives of the County for any purpose.
11. PUBLICATION. The Municipality shall acknowledge the financial assistance of the
County on all promotional materials, reports and publications relating to the activities
funded under this Agreement, by including the following acknowledgement: "Funded by
the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and State SCORE funds (Select Committee
on Recycling and the Environment).
12. INDEMNIFICATION. The County agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the
Municipality harmless from all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or
character, including the cost of defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its
public officials, officers, agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities
performed by the County under this Agreement.
The Municipality agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from all
claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of
defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its public officials, officers,
agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities performed by the Municipality
under this Agreement.
The provisions of this subdivision shall survive the termination or expiration of the term
of this Agreement.
13. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual written agreement of
the parties or by either party, with or without cause, by giving not less than seven (7)
days written notice, delivered by mail or in person to the other party, specifying the date
•
of termination. If this Agreement is terminated, assets acquired in whole or in part with
funds provided under this Agreement shall be the property of the Municipality so long as
said assets are used by the Municipality for the purpose of a landfill abatement program
approved by the County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto set their hands as of the dates first
written above:
CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA
By: By:
Name:
Title:
Date:
By:
• Municipality's Clerk
Date:
Approved as to form and legality:
•
Margaret Langfeld, Chair
Anoka County Board of Commissioners
Date:
ATTEST:
John "Jay" McLinden
County Administrator
Date:
Approved as to form and legality:
Assistant County Attorney
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: January 23, 2006
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND:
Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -10
Requesting CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) Speed
Study
Mn /DOT recently completed a speed zone study of the Lake Drive (CSAH 23)
corridor and authorized proposed speed limit modifications along this corridor.
The speed limit authorization form sent by Mn /DOT on October 26, 2004
approved a speed limit of 45 mph beginning at a point approximately 100 feet
south of the intersection with Marshan Lane. South of this point, the authorized
speed limit is 55 mph.
Based on proposed improvements on CSAH 23, staff is requesting a change in
the termini of the speed limit transition point. We believe that the appropriate
point of transition from 55 mph to 45 mph is approximately 700 feet south of
Marshan Lane. We are, therefore, asking that Anoka County request a speed
zone study to be completed by Mn /DOT on CSAH 23, taking into account the
proposed improvements on this roadway.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 06 -10.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 06 -10
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
• adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -10
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) CONDUCT A SPEED STUDY ON COUNTY
STATE AID HIGHWAY
(Lake Drive)
WHEREAS, Mn /DOT recently completed a speed zone study of the Lake Drive
(CSAH 23) corridor and authorized proposed speed limit modifications along this
corridor. The speed limit authorization form sent by Mn /DOT on October 26,
2004 approved a speed limit of 45 mph beginning at a point approximately 100
feet south of the intersection with Marshan Lane. South of this point, the
authorized speed limit is 55 mph.
WHEREAS, Based on proposed improvements on CSAH 23, the City of Lino
Lakes is requesting a change in the termini of the speed limit transition point. We
believe that the appropriate point of transition from 55 mph to 45 mph is
approximately 700 feet south of Marshan Lane.
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation sets the regulatory speed limit
on this street, and
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation may revise the speed limit on
certain streets upon completion of a speed study
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino
Lakes hereby requests the Commissioner of Transportation conduct a speed
study to be completed by Mn /DOT on CSAH 23, taking into account the
proposed improvements on this roadway.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
• Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
• Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23 day of January, 2006.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6.D.
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson
CC MEETING DATE: January 23, 2006
TOPIC: Resolution 05 -09
PUD Final Plan - YMCA
Legacy at Woods Edge
VOTE NEEDED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes YMCA has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a single
tenant health club within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate
35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists only of the building plans for the YMCA, as the lot on which it is
proposed to be built was already platted as part of the Village No. 3 final plat.
The City of Lino Lakes formed a partnership with the Greater Saint Paul YMCA in 1998 to assist in the
construction of a YMCA in Lino Lakes. In 2005 a contract was approved whereby the city agreed to provide 6.7
acres of land, $1.5 million for construction, plus utilities to the site in exchange for a YMCA of approximately
50,000 square feet that includes a teen center, gym, indoor pools, cardiovascular /strength training area, aerobic
studio, family program space and a child care area. In return, the YMCA agreed in part, to adhere to the
principles of the Town Center Design Guidelines.
The plans submitted indicate a first phase of development that will include 37,304 square feet of area spread
over two floors. Future phases are proposed to include a gymnasium expansion of approximately 4,200 square
feet; a swimming pool (natatorium) expansion of approximately 5,400 square feet; and an approximately 1,200
square foot multi - purpose room. The office and meeting rooms located on the parking lot side of the building
are single story, the gymnasium and swimming pool areas are open to the second floor, while the rest of the
structure has the locker room facilities on the first floor and the cardiovascular and studio areas above.
ANALYSIS
Governing Plans
This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town
Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit
Development for the site.
The proposed layout is significantly conforming to the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout that is included
.in the Development Guide. Though atypical to an `urban' development, the development's layout has always
acknowledged that this building was intended to take advantage of the surrounding natural environment as well
-49-
•
YMCA, page 2
as have minimal impact on the adjacent residential property by being setback from the street. These designs
have always indicated a connecting walkway through the parking lot of this site to link the YMCA facility with
the streetscape; this is further discussed in the landscaping section of the staff report.
The proposed YMCA building is located in a Civic Land Use Area and will be located on Lot 18 in Block C
(according to the land use plan of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide). Acceptable
Building Type is community facilities, such as libraries, City Hall, and community recreation such as the
YMCA.
The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under
construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part
of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates that there is no build -to line requirement for this
portion of that block, nor is there any `Required Building Entries', nor any `Gateways' indicated for this site.
Allowable Uses
The proposed use for this site is a YMCA facility. The Lino Lakes Town Center Development & Design Guide
classifies this use as `Indoor Recreation Facilities' and considers it a permissible use within the Civic District.
The applicable section is included below:
SECTION 3.1 ALLOWABLE USES
Table 1. Allowable Land Uses in Mixed -Use Commercial, Commercial /Residential and Civic Districts
Allowable Land Use
Public and Quasi - Public Uses
Indoor recreation facilities
Comm
ercial
Mixed Use
Civic
TABLE 1 NOTE:
P = permitted use.
I
P
Building Massing & Placement
The proposed building is not required to meet any build -to lines, therefore the placement of the building is
being dictated more by the desire to take advantage of the natural environment surrounding the south and east
sides of the site. The building is set back approximately 148 feet from the Village Drive right -of -way, 60 feet
from the south property line, and 65 feet from the east property line.
Again, because this building is not required to meet any build -to lines, the height of the structure is only
dictated by the overall height limitation of 45 feet. The height of the building never exceeds 31.5 feet; therefore
it is in conformance with the height standard.
Architectural Standards
The Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guidelines (LLTCDDG) typically require a base,
middle, and top approach to the architecture within the Legacy at Woods Edge project. During the master
planning process for the Legacy at Woods Edge project the feasibility of the YMCA meeting the architectural
design standards was a major issue. Considering the nature of the structure (large gymnasium / pool areas) as
well as the funding mechanisms used for construction, staff understood that meeting the specifications of the
architectural design standards would be difficult. This led to the site being moved from a more prominent
YMCA, page 3
location directly on the streetscape, to the currently proposed location. This allowed not only interaction with
the county park land, but also for the large wall expanses to be built away from the public eye.
This approach was continued as staff worked with the applicant. The single story elements of the building
received the utmost attention, as did the north elevation since it was highly visible from Village Drive. The
base of the single story structure is differentiated by both color and material finishes, and the top is also defined
with a crowning element in the form of either a metal cornice or cast stone coping.
The applicant has also taken steps to improve the visual appeal of the concrete tilt -up panels proposed for the
two -story elements of the building. The swimming pool portions of the panels are adorned with columns of
windows, and the north elevation embraces an adaptation on that columnar element with decorative metal
panels capped by a large window (a theme repeated else where on the elevations). Random vertical expansion
joints help deconstruct the rigid appearance of the panels. The applicant has also supplied to color options as
was requested, and will be brining samples to assist in the determination of a preferred color.
Due to the setback from the right -of -way for the building, the primary entry is being placed on the parking lot
side of the building. While this is atypical for an urban development like Legacy at Woods Edge, the location
of the building was always intended to be setback further from the street to take advantage of the natural
amenities of the site. The main entrance is connected to both Town Center Drive and Village Drive via
pedestrian walkways through the parking areas. Previous comments regarding the strength of the entry canopy
have been addressed by the architect with the provision of a vertically enlarged entry structure, an entry canopy
with greater mass, and a screen wall to provide shelter from the elements.
•Large windows throughout the elevations provide both daylighting opportunities and break up the monotony of
the wall planes. The design standards require a reveal of at least 2 inches from the exterior trim to create
shadow for visual interest rather than windows and trim flush with the building.
The proposed structure has integrated a number of climatic response devices that meet the design guidelines.
Daylighting of the interior space is being provided by the additional windows provided and a substantial shelter
for patrons is offered by the new entry canopy and screen wall.
Staff has included a recommended condition requiring the screening of all ground level and roof mounted
equipment; and a condition regarding the trash enclosure.
Parking Requirements
Single Use Peak Hour
Demand
4 spaces per 1,000 s.f.
*The above calculation is ba
Net Floor Area
(90% of G.F.A.)
Parking Required
Parking Provided
43,967 s.f. 176 176
Surplus
sed on the full build out (approximate total of 48,852 square feet gross floor area).
Per Chapter 3.5 of the guidelines, the City is maintaining a shared parking analysis for the entire development.
This analysis identifies peak parking demands at key times throughout the day. In the case of a health club, the
peak period is identified as 5 PM on both weekdays.
0
YMCA
Single Use Peak Hour
Demand
Parking Peak
(5 PM Weekdays)
Parking
Provided
Surplus
4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 176
176
YMCA, page 4
0
• The proposed use is clearly being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout that the applicant has
proposed with this application. pp
Entire Block
Single Use Peak
Hour Demand
Varies
Parking Peak
(5 PM Weekdays)
270
Parking
Provided
(street & off - street)
281 11
Surplus
The shared parking spreadsheet is based on the Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking Standards and as is
required by the Development and Design Guidelines. As always, staff will continue to review each project to
maintain the parking standards within this block as well as the entire development.
With a building of this size, the standards only require 5 bicycle parking spaces. Staff has included a condition
requiring that the YMCA to provide a bicycle parking areas sufficient in size to accommodate at least 5
bicycles. Considering the recreational use of the building though, staff is encouraging the YMCA to provide
capacity for closer to fifteen bicycles.
Landscaping Requirements
As previously mentioned in the Parking section of the report, the site plan indicates a total of 176 parking
spaces for this phase of the development. This means that the 23 trees provided throughout the lot exceeds the
•requirement of 1 tree for every 10 parking spaces. The parking lot on the north side of the building abuts
Village Drive and therefore must provide additional screening. The applicant is meeting these requirements by
providing a hedgerow of trees spaces 30 feet on center, with additional shrubbery.
Though the parking lot does not exceed the 300 space threshold to require a `connecting walkway' through the
parking lot, a `connecting walkway' has always been indicated on the development plan for this site. The
proposed connection meets the requirement for width, but it does not meet the requirements that the paving be
decorative or that shade trees be provided.
The YMCA site is proposing to use some innovative stormwater infiltration tanks as part of the on -site drainage
plan. The location of these infiltration tanks is the south end of the parking lot; therefore the landscaping
islands that are over these tanks cannot have trees in them as they would cause potential damage to the tanks.
As such the Environmental Board has requested that these islands be integrated into the infiltration plan by
being depressed with a rain garden -type landscape. The City's engineering consultant (S.E.H.) is evaluating
this proposal to determine if it is feasible. Since this is a very `urban' development the implementation of a rain
garden -type landscape will need to be heavily scrutinized. Staff is currently researching and developing a seed
mix/planting pattern that will excel in both form and function.
The south side of the site adjoins the County Park area and since some tree removal was necessary to complete
grading and the construction of the retaining wall to allow eventual construction on this portion of the site.
Additional trees may be removed for the construction of the trail. Once the location and extent of all
improvement are known, an appropriate plan for replacement will be developed in cooperation with the YMCA.
•
YMCA, page 5
As part of the land exchange to the YMCA, the city is requiring the dedication of a conservation easement. The
el oc ati on of this easement has not been finalized but will be included with the performance agreement for the
site.
Lighting
The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of
Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. A condition has been added that specifies the use of parking lot lighting in
conformance with what has been required on all of the other sites within the development. Additionally, the
lighting fixtures themselves must be submitted for review prior to this item being approved.
The building itself will include some architectural and building entry lights mounted directly to the building.
These fixtures will be used to highlight the building massing and will enhance the pedestrian environment.
Additionally, as was discussed in the landscape section of the report, lighting fixtures are indicated within the
`connecting walkway' area that is planned to connect the YMCA to the future building along the Town Center
Drive street frontage; however, the design of these fixtures needs to be confirmed.
Engineering
The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and a memorandum
including all of their comments is attached to the report. Any outstanding issues will be addressed through the
site performance agreement and building permit process prior to construction.
• Final Plat
Typical Planned Unit Development - Final Plan applications include a final plat for the site; however, since this
property is currently owned by the City of Lino Lakes and not the master developer or the final occupant, the lot
was platted as part of the Village No. 3 plat that was previously approved by the City Council.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the October 26th regular meeting. Their comments are
attached and are addressed in the landscaping portion of this report.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this application at the January 1 lth regular meeting.
They included conditions which have been either revised for clarification purposes or have been met with the
submission of revised plans. Specifically, staff feels that the revised landscaping plans submitted January 12,
2006 satisfy the requirements and intent of the following six conditions recommended by the Planning and
Zoning Board.
1. Staff will work with the developer to provide additional landscaping on the south side of the site.
2. The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate evergreen trees on the northeast corner of the
structure as shown on the architectural renderings.
3. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated.
YMCA, page 6
4. The landscape planters located over the infiltration tanks should be planted in a rain - garden type
landscaping. This planting plan will be developed by staff prior to the issuance of building permits
for the site.
5. A tree preservation plan must be submitted by the applicant.
6. The landscape materials must be substituted as outlined in the Environmental Board's Comments.
The Board also requested that the architectural elevations be revised to include a horizontal element to the
concrete panels, that the cornice or cap of the brick portions of the building be augmented, and that the base of
the metal paneling portion of the structure be strengthened. As these conditions were just placed on the project
on January 1 lth, the applicant has not made any revisions but has stated they will comply with the conditions of
approval recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board.
•
OPTIONS
1. Approval of Resolution 06 -09 approving the Final Plan for the YMCA.
2. Denial of Resolution 06 -09 approving the Final Plan for the YMCA.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval based on the following conditions:
1. A minimum two inch recess must be provided for all windows per the development standards.
2. All lighting fixtures must be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits.
3. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street
lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height;
shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade;
and shall be located within landscape planter islands.
4. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the
issuance of building permits.
5. The issues of the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff.
6. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities,
must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits.
7. The applicant shall provide a bicycle parking area sufficient in size to accommodate a minimum of
fifteen bicycles. The type of fixture provided and the location of this parking area must be reviewed
and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site.
8. The trash enclosure shall be attached to the main building, shall be constructed of materials
consistent to that of the main building, and should be appropriately screened with landscaping.
9. All ground mounted utility equipment shall be completely screened from view with appropriate
landscaping materials.
10. All roof mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view. This screening shall be
constructed of materials consistent with those used for the main building.
11. Pedestrian walkways through parking areas shall be indicated by a change in paving material and
shall include shade trees placed 25 feet on center.
12. The concrete panels shall include a horizontal detail as well as vertical detail.
13. The base of the structure clad with the metal siding product shall consist of a stronger material per
Town Center guidelines.
IIII1 111111111
1
197 -a'
Futon Orne.+ee
Cboin of Lakes YMCA
1
1.1•.e. wm.ee.
__J
WV e_
W rr67201)
. 1181-7201) . .
ron Ga
Chain of Lakes YMCA
YMCA of Greater St. Paul
2125 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis. MN 65413-2720
Ankeny Kell Architects
821 Raymond Ave., Suite 400
SL Paul, MN 55114
Chain of Lakes YMCA Parking Summary
Phase 1 178 spares
Phesa (1 263 spaces
PARKING SUMMARY
By Function
(Assumes maximum occupancy of building)
Spaces
Gymnasium • 1 occupant/1 car
Natatorium - 2.5 occupants/1 ear
Fitness Canter• 1 atxupentllcr
Aerobic -15 occupants/1 car
Multipurpose - 2 occupants/1 car
Teen/Senior Center - 2 occupants/1 car
Staff -1 occupengl car
20 (full capacity)
80 (full capacity)
80 (l00sf /person)
20 (30 people/class)
15 (30 people)
15 (30 people)
20
Total
210
By Uno Lakes Town Canter Design 8 Development Guide
Section 3.5 Table 4
Health Club - 4 spaces/1.000 al
Otltca - 3 speces /1,000 of
107
3
Total
110
•2005 W°nlwoed Frei...i ne Sahib.. Pie
Planting Plan
•
NP(
9 SS
:Ann noonnnnr.,
2 SA
( 3 Rm
T f ! II
18 MAiNT^IANCE-
r C"'.• ECGER
L✓
(8' MAna lE.
le' EAR ANCE
,Ititoserll Per
44."
/
Evergreen Tree Detail
Tree Detail
•
Shrub Detail
U
Plant List
WPC raoM:k./a1TANCA. NAY(
a°N 13 Mn? Meek / nor. sown
-BN W a r • 3 **
Maple / nea. .e.s .ao .
55 (0 wr ebb / Bat a nye
Stew. t Ionians 2 0 '0(300*' ii2 0 s b Blpeaw> / h *ire.
SP0
Pea. PM. b0t / ... 1300
WO 10 NaclAero Pa pa / 4t0w. 0lps.eab
M SI Vbtl Pm. / Pnu IoFe.e
YP IS YAau PTm / pYUe .bran
u1
sox
upnAmble / A1me., Clem stern
e Unreal / w..:wn.m
Oran Busk ban4.pYOa / 0brwbA emcee
ybe.. vwnwntel •a.ra.eae:
NCI[ 00000805 Cei PUN sunrsele ?044'°05 W RR PPM 0. A 06CM44CP.
4EOWI6R p0OS1MP TWA: IM
08 0[Jlb1Ts 01915101Y T0T04 33
a lltbIT . II= TOT
srewe TOT.. 110
500 AIrRA
x48 Aka
Planting Notes
04.001 Ea. R.
13.306 SO. r
P.m. mai pea. and but ytret. ar e1 rte. metere8 TM grmmlu Ana. m h0
• Lana.. Poem e'**O.r✓uo° an et Ou U. gent..
kgNneet. al.e0 iN c1 Neu m. year ,nrze.n Ou+u rem pmlini
punt. u . sr}een race. N:n.•O.n -qam a:u /r 0 ley Seanin poem en.I atrma u.
nut I. net nenBN eye 101 f.astnq .mere.
Neau ..1 be se pan
0 m **tlwe .famrtu
e0
NI Y.fi .. ewe kern e.ee ee .4
NI Aeon: awn heee lee.e.
Genehesus bon w bM' "ac. m ...hmn a...anew 0.0 4 Mtpi 1e
telie el no We than 5:1
Ilya 4 tfa en r erne.. Slaneaa N Weary Suds 4.11 00.1-.1.0) rwtem.ln :w b.r tn.
hmu •a be beta■ ee a0 nmera PPP ol*CO3 eacttu
Beetle .4 to b nalua .ee kw.' era b. et rasa, rnd. lat. hen ma M, Canal Mb.,
oa Mge .eau.
Caner ar she wn1Y inept. nib . uHilln prior. to NaMlatleo et Almon
mow ew1 0«,1004 ,9330 5:.. 'ale bar (501 - 43.003* w BS0 -252 -2100) oe .
uea - el PI uneugr.M ttBtMe
Slates et use option. reays:. 40. y+m.e eM turn N tut *40.16 pit. m. yep',
4aD W 8n »Mbenn 493, - Oast. uA one aatun. Muse b. /8144 I.
bor. lea ..nap m BB bate.. roman w, an potted pant. 0102 me wen Can ..t
Prue. um. m neueser. - per ..are .mew. pr.. and ta ama0r poor rrufdnG
Pea. .d M enmedatwy 30.0.4 urea wri.d .t ale Pr.., Mel -b, meteu. N *.[sorer
tarpon . wdP
onus. me** to be weeee unuus notes ne t. Oar .mead NisnW arse, a.
a': O ma e. . e l04Ae.B one red m r mn
ee°a ..e an. .41.1
erns 1. !. woes ..a.M . nOae se rasp e abb. tr. . us erWtl ehr tape. b mined.
*Annum wine te be as eteet..ewq :app xepem0n ea.bm010.
Pear ream. et P .e. has . cm. mulm 41.. reee eons CA w.. Okmp bee ernes.
M.ors pmwy bras (a.htm mesere nn.) wey Mn ..a Ma:r le*, 0' el .eem.e
aass muW me Palley-now Bin. 010040* (Co anon) sot. 4abbe the si* 0 .a ..zee
and et u**1 B' 6410 nn bees Miss nobs 4. eve
Nu.
to m.p3 sat s �. Motu Parma lot .a krra
lamas ape pepdfad 5.2.14 mue3.
4 peronria bed. a. enan.tel 5e. see. new ha. rued here !moth r e4 .404.6
wa: ano.n rn 0 a0441*0. cubs .°�e.nw.(t`e `.45344 *here ;rat.*. .anB ..d:. pa.a ub
xb.a rouen of pmt ..uea 10..0. •. Pee and w emdtvns
. pint. 0.labut none . queue run em0tuaas ham non bernueue n. IM
irmgalw .Pmum x fAWaP. O.. M ear.O nie •n u M Cn1403.. F 6109 nMYMwi n
me 8urlbn�Pebi au'sbuab4 ** neat. be T raga. 30.03 are** 01(32.0.0( oe the
Meru ea mosey. le *009041 440** Pubbe gwvn0 e. m ent um..
M10agnt mntata ntu!Iepi Cm elr prim to ... PM unworn
af Om to eae /e euanusbwua0m0
Irrigation
Plows 6na.bn u . 9031(00 a r9MM Ite. ape .p !.yetion pA b. °085./..40 -03
l�=e.. Cmoxur. .. 6003 and seers. tea M mu.U, Non
Gnbeelen S. nut ll
34.
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Ankeny
Kell
Architects
F*: FN -106-04
i1*
1 hereby a .Iffy INu plan.
pigemf0 0. m: 0,' 0d5. 4*
edbr.b. a Prat
i
bap
My. era
00
>
rW Z
co Z
Y2
0g
z
i0
Z
0J
Sheet: L1
. 00 0ramteep. PA SOT
/(jj 1-2 7 /
•
irt!
L
Y Y u
iL 4 i Y Y Ij
• l it
u u b 4 Y 4 4 Y L Y L L 4 Y y
uuuu
1'�.�
t-t ,J
.�•u
4 4 4 L ti
1'•�y��` Y Y 1. 0. 1.
Pue 4 Y lw `wow t y
i Y 4' b Y 1.1 I ..•��1
L u Y L Vl • j1
4
1. 4 mry0' u 1 Y w
1,
b b b
L
41414 Y�Y
\Y r Y
Y 4 L ji Y 4
• 4 Y `Y A:\ \w 4
0. Y 9 6 ■
4
b 4 4
A
L. I.
w
4 r Y w
L
L 4
Y Y
4
0. 0, 0 4 0, 0, I
Y
4
r,.
G-
\\\\\,:>
L1.YnW. SchechAe
ProJecb A11 Projects
s a
AA 01 1
BE 00 1
BB II 1
Lobel
LS100497
191s
SPIGR5
Arra
SINGL ne
E .1
Loners
40000
BACK -BAEK
SINGLE
5000
LLF
0.000
0000
Des
C1Mfi- 400- 314I -F-1433
CTM-A .100-!41- F-tlwble
Al ANG G45
N.Aerk: S1ewr9
Protect, All Prefects
Label COIATVP. t
CelcPts 01......
I ,Its IAVO 1 Mex I NM
Fe J LS] 1 7.9 0.2
Avp/MM 11e % /MM
79
133
rCe eye PiatesteruCAurtasesems esA1001LW0. 11 10 /20 09 11439 P4
SITE PLAN
SCALD 1•=30' -0'
Project
i
YMCA
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
MINNESOTA
I✓
4,
PARSONS
NW Nlel TRW Kc
IOII/ 1'Olq rlemu 20a12
P-70/571-1000
7-701/!11 -7210
!MI utryal
Project Information
10.07-03 =Am 1 an' WWI
OCT 1 0 2005
1y l i Y ` Li Y.2; L:7: .
Sheet Name—"'--
SITE PLAN
LIGHTING &
POWER
Sheet Number
r
FUTURE
GTYNASIUU
m
ME01ANICAL
FUTURE
NATATORIUM
• ■'U'A0U U Uk1112 /e/:
0011EN'S LOOCER ROM
Imunnnnn.
Obldh
i
0000110
00E5701
PIM
•
'Mr ri
Air r
FRONT DESK
10881
Al
(r=
ii ii 1 1
II II L J
LJ
1.01781 1189.3
-51
Mai
V _Y
LJ
0
n�
c SEATING
SEMI
s
e-n
1
1
L
FUTURE
YL4TPURPOSE ROOM
TEEN /SENIOR 8000
JI
JAN 0 6 2000
I ra
.ci-J- Y J .%I' Li \'iO LA}
SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY
FIRST FLOOR
Gymnesiten 456301
Gymnasium Storage 1520
Natatorium 51200
Woman'$ Lacer Room 13180
M.n'8 Locker Roan 127621
Family Lab Roan 897.1
Aquatic Deader 11721
Lilagurdl5loo.ge 980
Sun. 540
Kld•e 5048 18800
AAnlin.tndan 12970
Admire 5ioraue 2220
Confr.nn Rare 2420
Breekroom 2060
Workman 1790
Intervi.w Roan 1580
Reception Owe 2400
Multipurpose Room 14780
Multipurpose Storage 3130
KRahn 1420
Public Triad 5430
Lodby /SeatingN.Mng 20200
Mec4enical/Etev. Equip, 7330
Pod Machani0 8800
Landry ?IN
Janitor nor
SECOND FLOOR
Fitness 552330
Aerobics 19860
Aerobics Storage 38021
GROSS SQUARE FEET
373045E
562 .54 8WIdvp R.viow
Community Davaiopn.m Dcoarmwnt
Cry of Lino Lakes, Me040080
Janney 11, 2006
First Floor Plan
1/8"=V-0"
11,1
Arke y Ne6 Ar0it1w
GYMNASIUM
BELOW
AEROBICS
•
FITNESS
•
Roof BELOW
Fr-
•e+•
TO
BELOW
`CANOPY
BELOW
NATATORRJM
BELOW
i
_ _.__..._..if
•
•
ROOF BELOW
L
JjJ
f.
20IA
1'
•ems.
yam:
Us and Buld p Review
CommuNy Oeveopmert Department
aty at Lind Lakes Mknewb
Janwry It ZWB
a1
1
--- Second Floor Plan
1/8"=V-0"
1
II
Mkny Katl MiN.o,
PRECAST
CONCRETE PANELS
PRECAST
COIERETE PANELS
AUMDAM
WORRY ICAO
North Elevation
South Elevation
METAL SHINGLE
OCTAL CMIEPT
��METK SN➢MLE
COLOR a
META. SHINGLE
NCTM. TRELLLS
PREEDNm20
METAL CDIMiCC
METAL SIIDODLE
-IETN. SNDQE
ELLER l
PROVOIIED METAL CORNICE
METAL SHUCK
�COLR 1
PRICK
CLLDR
/CAST STYE CORING
CTLCR 2
RODEO PRECAST
PANELS
■ ICK
CO-OR a
(RICK
COdI
IETM. TRELLIS
PRECAST =CRETE PAELS
PRECAST
CCRCRETE PANELS
PREIDRS/EO METAL CORNICE
METAL SHINGLE
FOR I
CAST MN( CCPaG
RUMOUR WINDOW MEAD
IMF aill111111. 111111.1
METAL CRIMPY
CAST ERIK =MR
PR TDRSMEO METAL CORNICE
PWDRM/CP METAL
West Elevation
PRECAST
COCETE PANELS
I. ORNO.E
Co.a I
PIOIDR9CD METAL RASE
NJARDLIII
MEAD N➢ODM
PR6Th € NETPA
PRECAST
COEJE7E PANELS
'RIO(
COLOR IL
Cava
METAL
AL=at
PREP-DIMES IETK WE
PRECAST
CDNOETE NOELS
IETM. 1741_1_x
East Elevation
J;',N'):)200'6
Site and Buildimp Review
Community Dovebpmert Deennart
CIO of Lino Lakes. Mmesout
!empty 11, 7108
Exterior Elevations
Phase I
1/8"=V-0"
N -0"
If!
MkenyKel AmMoc
North Elevation
OCTAL :max
cam I
METAL CANOPY
South Elevation
RUED PRECAST
PANELS
1
West Elevation
ORDD(
CDLR
PRECAST
CDMCJE1E PANES
1
!ETON. S10ELE
C0.0t
WAD WINDOW EAI
PETAL TRELLIS
0101 2
PRECAST
CONCRETE PAIQS
F=
PREFDIISHED IETA. COME
PRECAST COTE PANELS
IDE METAL 9GKLE
CAST MC CCP1NG
PRECAST
rCOILTCT[ PANELS
PETAL CANOPY
CAST STOC COPING
PRECORS/ROD E OCTAL EIAGCE
PRESDC IETw
1
METAL SMINaE
CO-01 1
PR6I IO401 OCTAL RASE
�RIDO' VGIl1V
AUrEwe
East Elevation
CL OI I
Rent
COLOR
PREPPR9a METAL
PRECAST
CCPCNETE PAELS
i
I€TAL TRELLIS
SRO
OCTAL
AL amN3s
CO-Of I
PM:1'11 3HO) OETM. VASE
PRECAST
CuCRETE PANELS
,r1i11 11 ''3 7T3
S. and Building R..
Clmmwiy Devei pmar Department
City of Len Lake; Wonsan
January 11. 2008
Exterior Elevations
Phase II
1/8"=1.-0"
MFanYKal AChiMts
YMCA, page 8
.Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -09
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN FOR THE
YMCA.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a planned unit development — final plan approval
for property currently described to -wit:
Lot 1, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota.
; and
WHEREAS, the planned unit development — final plan approval request is based on the following
submittals:
7. Site Plan and Lighting Plan received October 10, 2005.
8. Revised Elevations and Floor Plans received January 5, 2006.
• 9. Revised Architectural Renderings received January 5, 2006.
10. Revised Landscape Plan received January 12, 2006.
•
; and
WHEREAS, at their meeting on January 11, 2006; the Planning & Zoning Board recommended
approval of the planned unit development — final plan subject to the conditions listed in the meeting
minutes; and
WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan meets the requirements of the City's
zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development
Guide subject to certain conditions of approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the
planned unit development — final plan for the YMCA subject to the following conditions:
1. condition 1
2. condition 2
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of January 2006.
John Bergeson, Mayor
YMCA, page 9
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of January, 2006.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
Council Member
4m 7 s h� �� + c‘('
t
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -09
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN
FOR THE YMCA.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a planned unit development — final
plan approval for property currently described to -wit:
Lot 1, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota.
; and
WHEREAS, the planned unit development — final plan approval request is based on the
following submittals:
1. Site Plan and Lighting Plan received October 10, 2005.
2. Revised Elevations and Floor Plans received January 5, 2006.
3. Revised Architectural Renderings received January 5, 2006.
4. Revised Landscape Plan received January 12, 2006.
; and
WHEREAS, at their meeting on January 11, 2006; the Planning & Zoning Board
recommended approval of the planned unit development — final plan subject to the
conditions listed in the meeting minutes; and
WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan meets the
requirements of the City's zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and the Lino Lakes
Town Center Design and Development Guide subject to certain conditions of approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the planned unit development — final plan for the YMCA subject to the
following conditions:
1. A minimum two inch recess must be provided for all windows per the development
standards.
2. All lighting fixtures must be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building
permits.
3. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's
decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no
more than twenty feet in height; shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than
twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be located within
landscape planter islands.
4. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed
prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. The issues of the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the
satisfaction of city staff.
Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites
Page 2
6. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for
stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance
of building permits.
7. The applicant shall provide a bicycle parking area sufficient in size to accommodate a
minimum of fifteen bicycles. The type of fixture provided and the location of this
parking area must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building
permits for the site.
8. The trash enclosure shall be attached to the main building, shall be constructed of
materials consistent to that of the main building, and should be appropriately screened
with landscaping.
9. All ground mounted utility equipment shall be completely screened from view with
appropriate landscaping materials.
10. All roof mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view. This screening
shall be constructed of materials consistent with those used for the main building.
11. Pedestrian walkways through parking areas shall be indicated by a change in paving
material and shall include shade trees placed 25 feet on center.
12. The concrete panels shall include a horizontal detail as well as vertical detail.
13. The base of the structure clad with the metal siding product shall consist of a stronger
material per Town Center guidelines.
14. Additional depth shall be added to the cap element of the structure clad with brick to
create more definition per Town Center Guidelines.
15. The future gymnasium, natatorium, and multipurpose room shown on the floor plan
shall be approved administratively if the elevations and materials are consistent with
the rest of the structure.
16. The shrubbery provided on the north side of the north parking lot must be salt -
tolerant, provide a year round screen measuring a minimum of 2 feet high at time of
planting and a minimum of 4 feet high at maturity.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of January 2006.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of January, 2006.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
� SEH
•
November 3, 2005
Mr. Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182
Dear Mr. Grochala:
RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota
YMCA
Site Plan Review
SEH No. A- L1NOL0305.11 SPCV
Identified below are our review comments for the proposed YMCA site at Legacy at Woods Edge,
prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of
Lino Lakes for review on October 10, 2005.
Plat
1. The updated drainage and utility easement needs to be shown.
Preliminary Site Plan (Sheet C1.0)
1. The trash enclosure area is not shown as on the Ankeny Kell site plan.
2. The phased parking boundary line in the southwest corner, at the entrance drive, is not reflective of
what will be built as a part of the public improvements. As shown, it will not match up with the
public improvements constriction. Coordinate with SEH to get the correct information.
3. Coordinate with SEH to get the correct retaining wall locations.
4. Dimensioning should be provided for the typical parking stalls and drive aisles.
5. The southern end of the drop -off zone in front of the building has a rather abrupt transition from the
main drive aisle. It may function better with a more gradual transition similar to the north side of the
drop -off zone.
6. There is no indication given as to what the surfacing and section of the service road will be.
Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.01)
1. Spot elevations should be placed at each end of the curb cut north of CBMH 4.
2. Coordinate with SEH to verify proper elevations in the southwest entrance drive.
3. Coordinate with SEH on proper wall location and elevations.
4. There are no details shown for the curb cuts in the median islands. A detail should be shown
dimensioning the size of the curb cuts.
5. The spot elevations at the north entrance off of Village Drive should be revised to match the
elevations shown•on the Village Drive plans in the Legacy at Woods Edge — Phase 1 plan set.
6. The grading plan shows the grading for the entire parking lot. If the lot is only being built to the
phase line, it appears that in the southwest area of the Phase 1 parking lot will have the existing
ground higher than the parking lot surface. It is suggested that the plan show the necessary grading
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite B, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350
SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax
-57-
Mr. Michael Grochala
November 2, 2005
Page 2
actions to match the existing ground along with the required seeding and erosion control measures.
The future phase plans will then show the earthwork required to match the Phase 1 parking.
7. What provisions are being made for temporary curbing where the future underground parking
entrance is at the building near the north entrance off of Village Drive? Some sort of curb will be
required to contain the runoff that will already be traveling in the gutter flow line.
8. It is recommended that spot elevations be revised on the curb at the parking entrance drive aisle just
south of Catch Basin 3 to demonstrate a high point or ridge to contain runoff flowing from the
parking area into the main drive aisle, then north to Village Drive.
9. Are any trees being impacted by the grading operations on the south and southeast sides if the
project? Impacted trees should be shown on the plans.
10. According to the submitted calculations, there is a very large amount of runoff being directed to CB
10 and CBMH 4 (9.65 cfs). Utilizing Neenah orifice flow calculations, these two Neenah catch basin
grates will not be able to handle this flow, resulting in ponding at this location. It appears a significant
amount of flooding of the main drive aisle would result in a 10 -year storm event. Additional storm
sewer catch basins should be utilized in the parking lot to collect some of this runoff before reaching
the southern end.
11. Coordinate with SEH on the exact location of the storm sewer chamber system. This will affect the
location of STMH 5 in the median.
12. Roof drain locations for the YMCA building should be shown on this plan.
13. The amount of runoff flowing into the basin at FES 11 is not shown. It is recommended that rip rap,
or some other acceptable method of erosion control, be placed from FES 12 all the way to the base of
the slope at the wetland to prevent erosion from the discharge out of FES 12.
14. Show pipe sizes on the plan for the storm sewer run from CB 3 to the existing manhole on the north
end of the site.
15. Spot elevations should be shown at all major building corners.
16. Storm Manhole 5 should have a 2' sump in it to aid in sediment collection before runoff enters the
storm chamber system.
17. Pond 3 has a nonnal water line (N.WL) of 888.4 and a high water line (HWL) of 889.7 after final
design of the public improvements. Please change Pond 3 information to reflect this.
18. When changing pipe sizes across a manhole or catch basin, match crown elevations, if at all possible,
to preserve hydraulic grade line instead of matching invert elevations.
Preliminary Utility Plan (C1.02)
1. Coordinate with SEH to show the revised water main through the YMCA site.
2. Note that the sanitary sewer near SSMH 1 will need to be installed under existing water main.
3. The 6" and 8" water main services should have 45° bends near the building rather than the 90° bends
shown.
4. Coordinate the water main connections on Village Drive with SEH to ensure they are completed
before bituminous surfacing is placed.
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite B, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350
SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax
-58-
•
•
Mr. Michael Grochala
November 2, 2005
Page 3
5. Dimension, or call out with notes, the horizontal separation between the water main and sanitary
sewer lines.
Preliminary Detail Sheet (C1.04)
1. All manhole and catch basin details need to call out the usage of Infi- Shield or equal neoprene sealing
sleeves around the rings and casting.
2. The typical sidewalk section detail has a typo calling out sidewalk to be 6" wide.
Landscaping Plan
1. Trees cannot be planted in medians that are located above the StonnTech stone sewer chambers.
Site Plan by Ankeny Kell
1. It is suggested that a walk be placed from each of the accessible parking loading aisles to the main
walk through the median area. This will provide an accessible route that will not force people out
into the parking lot and drive aisles to access the crosswalk to the main entrance.
Please call me at 651.765.2912 if you have questions.
Sincerely,
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
Stefan T. Higgins, PE
Proj ect Engineer
x:\ko \linol \030503 \yn,ca review \ymca review.doc
• Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite B, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350
SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax
-59-
Recommendations
Lino Lakes Environmental Board
October 26, 2005
• The following recommendations were made at the October 26. 2005 Environmental
Board Meeting
•
Preliminary Site Plan Review/YMCA/The Village #3
• Remove trees from the parking lot islands that are over the infiltration tanks.
Make these islands depress ional and a part of the infiltration plan. Slope the
parking lot to these islands. Plant a Rain Garden- type of landscape in the two
depressional islands.
• Landscape areas: Infiltration areas should be constructed with low -
compaction equipment. All turf areas should be thoroughly tilled after top
soil is spread. Verification of this practice should be done by the
Environmental Division of the City. It is suggested that escrow dollars be
applied form this work.
• Change some of the Autumn Blaze maples to Northern Pin Oak. The Pin oaks
give the same fall color effects as the Autumn Blaze Maples and are not as
sensitive to lack of timely pruning. Short term losses to the Autumn Blaze
Maples can be expected if timely pruning is not applied. Substitute White
or /and Bur oak for the Fall Gold Ash. Fall Gold Ash has been removed from
the City planting list because of massive tree failure. One of the original
intents of The Village was to meld development into the existing natural
(Regional Park) landscape. Therefore the same tree substitutions of Oaks for
Willows should be made. The proposed Scotch and Austrian Pine should be
changed to Red pine and White Pine. More trees should be designed along
the area to the South bordering the wetlands where trees were lost due to
project clearing. These trees could be any combination of native Oak,
Hackberry, Green Ash, Cherry and Red Maple.
• Under the Planting Notes of the Project Design Sheets, loamy backfill into the
planting holes should be avoided. Trees should be backfilled with existing
soils.
• Turf areas should be tilled as deep as possible into the subsoil after topsoil is
spread. Verification of this cultural practice should be done by the
Environmental Division of the City. It is suggested that some escrow applied
for this work.
• The City Native Seed mix should be used in pond and restoration areas south
of the trail. Sod areas should be shown on the plan as irrigated. Seed labels
must be verified before seeding begins. The developer should hire a
landscape contractor knowledgeable in the in installation and maintenance of
native plants. A contract with such a company should be submitted to the
City for approval. The company should be hired for a minimum of 3 to 5
years.
• The YMCA should submit a Tree preservation Plan that identifies all
significant trees within 50 feet of the construction area. Significant trees on
the perimeter of the project must be protected with a 4 -foot orange snow
fence. This fence must be installed before construction begins.
•
•
•
• Somewhere on the Erosion Control Plan it must be indicated the location on
the site where the erosion control plan will be located, along with required
weekly and post rainfall event inspection reports. A contact and phone
number should also be listed for the responsible site NPDES Supervisor. The
plan should note that additional rock will be stockpiled or brought in should
the rock entrance become dysfunctional due to rock -pore filling. All storm
sewer catch basins should be protected with an approved device such as the
Royal Infrasafe Collection Device.
• No soils should be imported or exported without City approval.
• A post development BMP plan should be written and be part of an over all
BMP /Maintenance for the Woods Edge Development.
• The proposed Conservation Easement for the site should be written to
minimize tree and plant loss. Signs should be placed at the Easement.
Motion to approve by Bor, Second by Bauman. All were in favor.
PEAK HGHT.
EL. 191' -0'�
PEAK HGHT.
EL. 123' -l'
EAVE HGHT.
EL. 114' -`i'
SOFFIT HGHT.
le IF
tL. 113' -9'
WNDW. HGHT.�`�
tL. III
-vier
FIN. FLR.
tL. Imo'• p'
STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF
I!4
STANDING 6EAM METAL
ROOF
=,C t®
MAR 2 7 2002
CITY ,KB IKI LAKES
XTERIOR ELEVATION
100 north sixth street
suite 650c
minneapolis, mn
55403 -1594
T 612 339 2257
F 612 349 2930
www.shealinkcom
«minneapois » .c.c "
client:
TCF BONK
project title:
TCF BANK
BRANCH BANK
LINO LAKES
MINNESOTA
sheet title:
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
pmiact nir S5
scale: AS S
drawn by: -MN
checked by:
team certain
MK
date:
no. dale issued for
1 hereby cerlily that this plan S P BCeficat0n
or report was prepared by n'!B Otr under
my direct supervision and tts� ! a�
a
duly registered architect and r % �B Ian of
thestatant e'eJSattLVEBDTA
0195E
date.
rec. ncz=
21585
A7. 1
SOD & PP/ANTING
BEDS TO BE
IRRIGATE
TIP.
//
PQ1.Y -EDGE
HARDWOOD MULCH
TYPOVER FILTER MAT
LIMITS
CONSJ6(UCTION
/.0', tr.
(b rSa
O
LIMITS 0
CONSTIitUCTION
OMITS OF
CONSTRUCTION
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE
OTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE REMARKS
B
AB
AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE
Acer freemenni 'Autumn Blaze'
2" B &B
S.SITN IN.
3
BN
RIVER BIRCH
Betulo nigra
10' HT, B &B
smMXa 1AMK. NO v -cnmo,
3
CC
THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN
Crataegue true -gall' var. inermis
1.5" B &B
rms. Tece. NO Va1mo1
1
CO
COMMON HACKBERRY
Celtis occidentallis
2" B&B
swan mueu NO v -aaux
3'
FP
GREEN ASH
Fraxlnus pennsylvanica
2" B &B
MAW 1070 NO v -aNTCH
6
GT
SKYUNE HONEYLOCUST
Gleditsia triocanthos 'Skyline'
2" 8 &8
mwaer eaxK NO D-IR1R D
1
GIB
SWAMP WHITE OAK
Ouercus bicolor
'Redmond'
2° B &8
sIRNONr Pwfio NO v -amlgl
2
TA
REDMOND LINDEN
Tilia americono
2" 8 98
s1NNONT WAN, NO V-avmH
SHRUBS
8
AH
ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA
Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle'
24" HT., CONT.
r}J.. Is
11
CA
COMPACT AMERICAN CRANBERRY
Viburnum trilobum 'Bailey Compact'
24" HT„ CONT.
P1TP.
11
CM
COMPACT AMUR MAPLE
Acer ginnal0 'Compoctum'
3' B &8
18
SP
MISS KIM LILAC
Lyringa patina 'Miss Kim'
3' HT. B &B
,"SI
7
19
DR
CS
DART'S RED SPIREA
ISANTI DOGWOOD
Spiroea x bumalda 'Darts Red'
Comue 00010 a 'Isantl'
18" HT., CONT.
24" HT„ CONT.
M415. E4E.3
paw, .
36
LP
LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA
Spiroeo Japonica 'Llttle Princess'
18° HT., 0014T.
rHf NE
29
JS
SEA GREEN JUNIPER
Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green'
24" DIA., CONT.
raz WE
29
SJ
SCANDIA JUNIPER
Juniperus sabina 'Scondlc'
24° DIA., CONT.
risk titie
PERFNNIAI 5
2
81
BOSTON IVY
Porthenocissus tricuspidata 'Robusto'
1 GAL., CONT.
PLANTING NOTES:
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO
SUBMITTING BID TO BECOME COMPLETELY FAMILIAR
WITH SITE CONOI11015.
INSTALL 5' MIN. BLACK DIRT TO ALL 50D AND SHRUB AREAS.
CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR FINE GRADING OF SOD AREAS.
CONTRACTOR WILL STAKE OR LURK ALL PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE OWNERS
REPRESENTATIVE APPROVE ALL STAKING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION,
ALL SHRUB AREAS UNLESS SPECIFIED AS OTHER, TO BE BED
95101100 WITH 4-6" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH
OVER WEED BARRIER. POLY -EDGER TO BE VALLEY VIEW BLACK
DIAMOND OR APPROVED 00550.
INSTALL 4-e" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOODP MULCH AROUND ROOT
SAUCER OF ALL TREES ISOLATED FROM PLANT BEDS.
PLANTING 501E SHALL CONSIST OF 5084 SELECT LOAMY
TOPSOIL 2584 PEAT MOSS, 2584 PR RUN SAND.
CONTRACTOR WILL COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL WORK FOR A
PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING AT THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE
CONTRACTOR WILL MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS PROMPTLY (AS PER
d800110N OF OWNER).
ANY MATERIAL WHICH DIES, OR DEFOLIATES PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE
OF THE WORK) WILL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED AND REPLACED,
THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO
REJECT ANY PUNT MATERIAL NOT MEETING SPECIFICATIONS.
ALL MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EODION
OF THE AtARICAN 5rAN0ARD FOR NURSERY STOCK,
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN.
PRUNE DEAD AND BROKEN
BRANDIES
ROCK MULCH
PIINRNO SOIL
ORNNAGE MOUND
oSHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
NOT To 1oA49
ALL TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH BROWN CREPE
TREE WRAP. APPLY WRAP IN NOVEMBER AND REMOVE IN
APRIL
LM'DSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO WATER AND MAINTAIN ALL
RANT MATERIALS ANO SOD UNTIL MIX ACCEPTANCE
REPAIR AT 140 COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE 10 PROPERTY
RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE WORK.
CONTRACTOR 454 -00002 AND FOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UNDERGROUND ONE
UTILITIES AND WALL AVOID DAMAGE TO UTILITIES DURING THE
COURSE OF THE WORK. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIR-
ING ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES, SITE STRUCTURES, ETC„ RESULTING
FROM LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING
ALL PUNT MATERIALS UNTIL THE TIME THE PERMANENT IRRIGATION
SYSTEM IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL
CHEMICAL WEED CONTROL MUST BE APPUED 10 ALL LANDSCAPE
AREAS PRIOR TO ANY PLANT INSTALLATION.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION
8101 GENERA. CONTRACTOR
STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES OPTIONAL: LANDSCAPE
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PLUMBNE55 OF TREES F35
MIRADON OF WARRANT! PERIOD.
SWEEP AN WASH ALL PAVED SURFACES AN REMOVE ALL
DEBRIS RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS.
CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF AN
IRRIGATION PLAN WITH 1005 COVERAGE FOR SOD MD SHRUB BEDS
S00 AN0 SHRUB AREAS TO BE ON SEPERATE ZONES.
USE RAIN13190 OR APPROVED EDUN.. COORDINATE WITH PROPERTY
OWNER.
N\PR
OTREE PLANTING DETAIL
NOT TO 0FJ1X
X11
0' 20' 40' 80'
SCALE IN FEET NORTH
PRUNE DEAD AND BROKEN
BRANCHES
1' 580E NYLON STRAP
cur BRE (3/REEL
2 X 2 1941109000 MAWS
(3/TREE)
HARDWOOD MULCH
PEEL BACK BURLAP
PLANTING SOIL
DRAINAGE MOUND
ALLIANT
ENGINEERING
I N C O N P O I A T E D
®
200 PARK
SUITE 200
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 88415
40111 7084080 PHONE
10121 7054058 FAX
SHEA
0ull.r Spun's.. SOU 0500
100 North SM. Surf
MNnepd4 MN 10403
(515) 339 -2277 peen.
(612) 590 -2230 Er
ARCH1TECT9,INC
LAKES MARKETPLACE
TCF - LINO
REVISIONS
3.26.02 City comments
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
DATE ISSUED
SCALE
JOB NO.
MA
MA
2.4.02
1 " =20'
02002
L -1
SHEET 5 OF 9
1
1
1
S3NV1 oNn AO Al➢o
900Z Z I NVf
03A1303a
V
do
i illi
'{ii
J
Hlt.xNSR .TPPnc"WM
Ailli
w.u. ..a...ao
VVOWA 83INVl d0 IVHO
a
1
p
1
III}IIII
as
axea 11
1 iheaYir n i1 +YY
V
1
i 1 f
I! I i t � Il . 1hill �`i 1
t} { {ftjij 1 i 1i 1 1J11 f ff 1 `i
�1 l At 1 i 1 , i ! 11 1 . t i tii f
{ 7`� i ii7 i
!him' 1 01 i1 i!! !i 1 €tlEiiFi� i;t i1 ti (1i
!j im' ! ji ]D `� !1 j`itil lip
1l1i7 `!
[ 111 ;111111 j !ii
! 1�1 ! i i ]If
'If { } i .!11.1111111 I
=7` iitil� {{ °'111 { i ! s :' j1� }'s;�ii 1sI j
111 7 Ii1}7 11111stl.�1liY.17 {..111,111 }ii.1
11
1,1
11
N
E r—
v
x
'f
� 0 W
1 ..21211211121 \a/SErgith
n
1
s
d
CD
eaosauulw `sale7 ourl
VOVR safe -1 J0 uiey3
rr .
II
II
II
II
-11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
LL
-,
it
II
MOO
0
r�
U
U
U
a4
LL W
I,111 jA11111, a
�s131 I: 1111111D
t-, iu
o
1- 1
o i
I � '
9 Y �
11 Im
�n
k VIIiIJlIIIiINIHH
C
L
t
COLTI
01 Ai
I
> ED
.10.00 55 110
1
mu. 11
Veggium
E
J
J
X
— 9
i
rr
epsaum 'soNei our]
VOINA sale] lo ujego
iiiiiiiiiii
J
a
III
i9
III
M 111111 I 1 11111111111111
11 1111 111
M I11111111111I I1I 111111
■ ■ 11111 1 111111111111111 I
■ 11111111111111111111111
111111
M1111111111111111111111
r
Z
;OSMIUM 'SG4B1 Olin
VOINA se>lel Jo' uleu
11
_ ;
61 4 14 41
ii
ig
South Elevation
ga
i
M 111111111111111111 I I I I
M 11111111111111111 0 1 11
M I11111111111I111111111
M1111111111111111111111
..1111111111111111111111
..IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
d 61
z
ejosaum 'sa )il'oun
VOV A SOj ] 40 Ulan
1
1
10
1
u
South Elevation
110
110
P
1
W
w
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6 E
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
C. C. MEETING DATE: January 23, 2006
TOPIC: i. Resolution No. 05 -153
Comprehensive Plan Amendment: West of I -35E
ii. General Concept Plan, Planned Unit Development
Hardwood Creek LLC
VOTE: •4/5 for Resolution No. 05 -153
•no formal vote needed for concept plan
BACKGROUND
We have received an application from Village of Hardwood Creek, LLC, to amend the
comprehensive plan. The application also includes a general concept plan for a planned
unit development. A comprehensive plan amendment requires a formal vote. The
concept plan review is informal and does not require a vote.
However, much of the discussion has focused on the parameters of the concept plan.
Because of that, this report has been revised to address the site design issues first. The
discussion of the comprehensive plan amendment follows that. It is important to note
that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not grant or imply any right to
an approval of the PUD application that likely will follow.
The 2004 growth management policy (Ordinance 24 -04) was prepared to implement the
intent of the comprehensive plan. The growth management policy requires that several
issues be addressed if the City is to accommodate this application. This project
application is the first one that requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan as
directed by the growth management ordinance. Review of the relevant parts of the
comprehensive plan resulted in recommendations to add or change several passages. The
amendment to the comprehensive plan would involve a number of elements.
This application does not include a planned unit development or preliminary plat. It does
not include the detailed information normally part of such applications. Because of this,
we did not pursue exempting the project from growth management limits as a
conservation development. In addition, there are some limits from which we cannot
grant exemptions. Therefore, a comprehensive plan amendment is needed to address
growth issues as well as changing the land use designation for the site.
-62-
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 2
Basically, three parts of the plan amendment relate directly to the application: changing
the land use, adding MUSA, and addressing the growth management issues. Because the
comprehensive plan is a city -wide document, we need to ensure that amendments to the
document support future planning needs in this area and elsewhere in the city.
The proposed land use map change is Exhibit A of Resolution 05 -153. The text
amendments to the comprehensive plan are included in Exhibit B of Resolution 05 -153.
It is important to note that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not
grant or imply any right to an approval of the PUD application that will follow. Design
specifics, including road alignments, will be part of a full PUD review.
ANALYSIS
Site Summary: The site comprises 363 acres west of 35E and east of 20th Ave. (see
Site Location map). The site has been used for agricultural purposes. There are two
existing homes on the site, fronting 20th Ave. Two smaller properties comprising about
seven acres form a rectangle along 20th Ave. and are not part of the site at this time.
However, this seven acres should be included in the land use change and MUSA if the
larger site is to be changed. The following table lists the land uses and zoning on the site.
Location
Existing Land Use
Guided Land Use
Existing Zoning
Site
agriculture, residential
Industrial, High- Density
Residential, Medium - Density
Residential
Rural and Rural
Business
Reserve
North
agriculture, residential
Rural and Medium - Density
Residential
Rural and Rural
Business
Reserve
South
townhomes, vacant
• Commercial (Lino Lakes)
• Commercial and High- Density
Residential (Centerville)
Rural Business
Reserve
East
1 -35 E and agricultural
1 -35 E, Industrial
Rural
West
agriculture, residential
Low Density Sewered Resid.,
Low Density Unsewered Resid.
Rural Business
Reserve
The comprehensive plan guides the site for industrial, high- density residential, and
medium- density residential uses (Figure 2). To the south of the site, 40 acres is in
Centerville and is guided for high- density residential and commercial uses in the
Centerville comprehensive plan. The site is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area.
The proposal is to change to land use map to guide the site for Mixed Use (Figure 3).
The site is zoned Rural and Rural Business Reserve (Figure 4).
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 3
A number of small wetlands pepper the site, many of which have been farmed. Patches
of trees exist around the perimeter of the site. A pipeline runs diagonally through the
northeast corner of the site.
Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA): The Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA) is the area within which the City can extend sanitary sewer. Most cities
simply map their MUSA. Lino Lakes has land within the mapped MUSA but also has a
MUSA reserve. As part of the approval of the comprehensive plan in 2002, the City
received additional MUSA reserve acres from the Metropolitan Council. The amount of
MUSA reserve was based on the City's estimates of the need for residential and
commercial /industrial development. There are only 90 acres remaining in reserve for
Stage 1 (pre -2010) residential development and 64 acres remaining for
commercial /industrial development.
The development project site requires 363 acres of additional MUSA. The rectangular
exception is about 7 acres, for a total of 370 acres. A request for 370 acres of new
MUSA would be part of the amendment submitted to Metropolitan Council for review.
This 370 acres of MUSA would be for the specific site, and would not be part of the
MUSA reserve.
Growth Management, Number of Units: The growth policy establishes a
target for the number of dwelling units that can be platted each year: 147. This works
out to a total of 1029 units between 2003 and 2010 (147 x 7 years = 1029). There are 76
units available for year 2007, 147 for 2008, and 147 for 2009. The proposed
development area is intended to accommodate 1100 to 1200 dwelling units over six
years. This would exceed the growth goals for dwelling units.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN
The developer's intent is to master plan the 363 acres for commercial and residential
uses. The specifics are not finalized yet. As described in the zoning ordinance, the
purpose of a PUD general concept plan is to provide an opportunity for the applicant to
submit an application and plan to the City showing the basic intent and the general nature
of the entire development. The concept plan (Figure 5) provides an opportunity for the
proposal to be publicly considered at an early stage. The specifics of the development
layout will be reviewed with a PUD application.
City Council discussions on earlier concepts have yielded the following comments:
• The name of the project will be re- examined. The town center area at the I -3 5 W
interchange is referred to as "the village ". The I -3 5E development area should have a
name that does not cause confusion.
• The number of multi - family units should be re- examined.
• The developer should aspire to the higher quality housing products.
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 4
• There is support for examining the possibility of single -level products to
accommodate those needing units without stairs, such as seniors.
As stated in the zoning ordinance (Sec. 2, Subd. 10.F.7.), the following elements of a
proposed general concept plan represent the immediately significant elements for review:
1) Overall Maximum PUD Density Range.
In Lino Lakes, density is calculated on the net area: simply by subtracting the
wetlands from the gross site acreage. Some rough estimating, which includes open
space and right of way data for the residential area only, leads to a residential density
about 4.5 units per acre.
2) General Location of Major Streets and Pedestrian Ways.
The concept plan includes the main collectors and access points envisioned in the
draft AUAR (see attached Figure 6, taken from Figure 21 -1 of the AUAR). The
AUAR follows access management guidelines with 1/2 mile spacing between full
intersections on 20th Ave. The concept includes:
• A local north/south collector provides a route through the site. The
north/south collector would continue south to access Main St., and north to
future developments.
• Two collector roads provide access to 20th Ave. on the west of the site.
• The concept plan also shows an internal local circulation network providing
access for the residential development areas.
The AUAR recognizes the importance of managing access to major transportation
infrastructure. Collector and arterial roads will not function well if new road
intersections and driveways are allowed without an overall plan.
The development site does not abut Main St. The pictured collector road would
need to extend % mile south of the site to access Main St. The Centerville /Lino
Lakes border complicates the situation, as does the undetermined interchange design.
Main St. is challenging for two reasons: the major reconstruction project being
planned by Anoka County; and the I -35E interchange planning underway among Lino
Lakes, Anoka County, Centerville, and MnDOT. The current front runner for the
interchange design includes a typical diamond with one exception. In the northwest
quadrant of the interchange, the southbound exit ramp forms a new intersection and
continues onto a new city street south of Main St. (see attached Figure 7). This new
city street would run between the existing 21St Ave. and I -35E, with a new signalized
intersection on Main St. only about 600 feet from 21St Ave. The latest plan is to limit
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 5
turning movements at the 21St Ave. intersection to allow westbound Main St. traffic to
flow freely from the exit ramp to a reconstructed, signalized intersection at 20th Ave.
A new road from Main St. north to the Hardwood Creek development would
provide access to the site. However, there are a number of considerations that will
need to be addressed with site design: enough stacking distance and the level of
service near the interchange, Anoka County's view of access in the area, including
spacing of signalized intersections, access to properties within Centerville, and water
and sanitary sewer trunk alignment to serve the project. The new road likely will
align with the existing 21St Ave. and have restricted turning movements. Traffic from
the freeway could enter the Hardwood Creek site from Main St., but to return to the
freeway would require exiting the site via 20th Ave. then turning east onto Main St.
In many ways, then, the primary access for the site would be 20th Ave., and the
internal road design will have to reflect this.
Several roadway issues must be resolved. These include the design of the I -35E
interchange and the final design for the intersection at 21st Ave. and Main St. These
questions will apply whether or not the comprehensive plan is amended and no matter
how the site is developed. The point is that there are alternatives for creating accesses
to the site, though they are limited somewhat by the larger transportation system
needs. The details will have to be worked out as part of the PUD review.
Any project approval will need address improvements. Anoka County will
reconstruct Main St. and signalize the 20th Ave. intersection. However, the
Hardwood Creek project will need to improve 20th Ave. north to 73rd St., where a new
local collector that serves the development area will access 20th Ave. Improvements
to 20th Ave. likely will consist of:
• four lanes from Main St. to 73rd St.
• turn lanes at the intersection.
• traffic signal at the intersection.
• striping and turn lanes at the northern access (approx. 75th St.)
It is not clear yet when there will be adequate funding for a new I -35E
interchange, including new ramps and bridge. It is expected that all new development
in the area will contribute toward this major piece of infrastructure lest development
be halted indefinitely due to inadequate public facilities.
3) General Location and Extent of Public and Common Open Space.
The City's Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan
includes trail connections to be created on the site. The AUAR Conservation Design
Framework also requires trails and greenways. The concept plan includes an
extensive open space network. This would comprise stormwater management
features, parkland, and trails combined into a large greenway system consistent with a
number of public values:
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 6
• There is more trail corridor than the park plan shows: this will facilitate walking
and biking within the site and connect to future trails outside the site.
• There is more open space than the park plan shows.
• Open space includes several small parks for neighborhood play activities.
• Implementation of other elements of park system plan:
• Natural Resource Protection Area: preservation of wetland area along 20th
Ave.
• Natural Resource Conservation Area: will create a buffer around the wetland
(also an important directive of the AUAR mitigation plan)
• Natural Resource Enhancement Area: the new trail & open space corridor
will create features which don't now exist, providing numerous ecological
benefits:
o creates "natural" open space by planting native species
o native species promote filtration and infiltration of water, improving water
quality and also
o creates habitat for numerous species
To ensure the long term health of these elements, we would require mechanisms
similar to what we created for the Foxborough conservation development:
• conservation easements over key ecological areas
• long term stewardship plan including funding and specified responsibilities of the
homeowner association(s), the commercial properties association(s), and the City
It would be impossible to create such a large open space and trail network, and the
funding and implementation mechanisms, if the area were to develop a piece at a
time. A 40 -acre or 80 -acre development would not be able to supply such
environmental and recreational amenities. This is one of the advantages of large
scale, master -plan development.
4) General Location of Residential and Non - Residential Land Uses with
Approximate Type and Intensities of Development.
Single family and multi - family residential areas are shown on the concept plan.
The early concept plan showed housing over approximately 150 to 170 acres.
Commercial uses in the southeast portion of the site would comprise 55 to 70 acres.
After city council discussions, a revised concept plan reduced the number of
multi - family units and includes some "single- level" units (main floor living area with
lower -level walkout). This reduced the total number of dwelling units to about 1150.
The conditions of approval in the ordinance include a maximum number of
dwelling units, a maximum residential density, and a minimum commercial acreage.
The specifics of the development layout will be reviewed with a PUD application.
•
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 7
5) A Staging and Time Schedule of Development.
The submittal included a phasing plan. The site would develop from south to
north, with over half the commercial development and some residential in phase one.
Phase two would include the rest of the commercial area and a large amount of
residential. Phases three and four would continue the residential development. The
developer envisions full build out of the site over six years.
However, any approved phasing plan will have to be based on infrastructure
capacities. This will be examined with the detailed application.
6) Other Special Criteria for Development.
The AUAR has been completed. The project design must comply with the AUAR
mitigation plan. In addition to those discussed above, some specific elements
include:
Stormwater management to promote water quality is an important concern.
Several branches of the county ditch system lay in tiles crossing the site. In addition,
many drain tiles that are not part of the ditch system were placed on the site over the
years to drain the land for agriculture. Much of the potential for incorporating
conservation development elements into the development lies with the stormwater
management design. Utilizing infiltration to the greatest extent possible will be
important, as will accommodating the flow currently carried by the numerous drain
tiles. The resolution includes a number of requirements taken right out of the AUAR
mitigation plan, such as:
• infiltration through sheet flow, swales, rain gardens
• control of runoff rate
• control of runoff volume
• provide 1 -foot contours
• break up impervious surfaces
• disperse outflow from storm facilities (to create sheet flow, infiltration)
• stormwater management areas with shallower slopes for more infiltration
Development timing /phasing will be another important aspect of this
development. Transportation infrastructure is needed to support a development of
this size. In addition, improvements to the water and sanitary sewer infrastructure
will be needed to support full build out of the project. The extent and timing of site
development will rely heavily upon these issues.
Conservation Development Issues
Stormwater management methods, open space areas, connecting habitat and trail
greenways are conservation development elements described in several policy
•
Comprehensive PIan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 8
documents. The Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan provides
guidance. As an incentive, the growth management policy allows conservation
development to be exempt from a number of the growth restrictions. The Alternative
Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) states in the mitigation plan that the Conservation
Development Framework is a fundamental precept for all development within the AUAR
area. Every project can and must incorporate conservation development design and /or
low impact development techniques.
The applicants intend this to be a conservation development project. They are aware of
the City's desire to encourage conservation design, and participated in the AUAR project.
They also found the growth management incentives attractive. However, the exemptions
from growth limits do not include the Stage 1 MUSA total, so a comp plan amendment
would still be necessary.
The concept plan embraces, on a conceptual level, the conservation development ideas
and elements. Discussions of open space, innovative stormwater management methods
and attention to the long term management of these design features demonstrate good
planning by the developer and are consistent with the City's environmental planning
goals. The site is within the AUAR area and all development there must observe the
Conservation Development Framework. The means that conservation development
elements will be mandatory in the PUD design.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
The following lists amendments of the comprehensive plan to be considered:
(1) The proposed land use plan map must be amended if the application is to be
approved. The current designations are Industrial, Medium- Density, and High -
Density Residential. This would be changed to guide the entire site for Mixed Use.
(2) The amendment must include a request for 370 acres of MUSA for the Stage 1
growth area.
(3) Even though our comprehensive plan includes Mixed Use on the proposed land use
map, there is no description of this land use category in the text of the document.
This should be addressed by describing the intent of the Mixed Use category.
(4) The growth management ordinance states that an amendment of the comprehensive
plan shall be required if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the
annual target for new growth would be exceeded (Ordinance No. 24 -04, Section 2,
7.). It is unlikely that the master plan for this development could proceed within the
limits of the target of 147 units per year. (The 1029 units for Stage 1 noted in Section
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 9
2, paragraph 5 of the growth policy, is based on 147 x 7 years.) This comprehensive
plan amendment would fulfill the requirement of the growth management ordinance.
(5) The comprehensive plan itself includes a list of Growth Management Policies, which
includes "Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a
three year supply lot inventory" (page 27). As stated above, this would not
accommodate the anticipated development project. This statement should be
reviewed to accommodate the potential advantages of master planning large areas.
(6) The growth goals described in the comprehensive plan "assume an average of 147
new households annually through the year 2020" (page 63). This statement merits
discussion.
(1) & (2) Land Use Plan Amendment: Land Uses and MUSA
The comprehensive plan includes a "Proposed Land Use" map. The application includes
amending that map. Currently, the site includes land guided Industrial (290 acres),
Medium Density Residential (45 acres), and High Density Residential (25 acres). The
AUAR included a market analysis based on recent development rates in Lino Lakes.
There are 1072 acres guided for industrial uses along 35E. At historic rates, it would take
well over 100 years to develop all this industrial land. Converting some of this to
accommodate the commercial and residential development that would make up the
Hardwood Creek project will not prevent industrial growth in the city.
• The proposed land use for the site should be changed to Mixed Use, as shown on the
attached map "Proposed Amendment To Land Use Plan (Detail) ". (Figure 3, and
Exhibit A in Resolution 05 -153.)
• The amendment should include a request for 370 acres of MUSA for this project.
This new MUSA would be applied to the site, not held in the MUSA reserve. The
resulting MUSA line is shown on the "Proposed Amendment" map. (Figure 3, and
Exhibit A in Resolution 05 -153.)
(3) & (4) Text Amendment: "Mixed Use" Land Use Category and Addressing
the Growth Management Ordinance
The comprehensive plan Proposed Land Use Map includes twelve land use categories.
The text in the Land Use Plan chapter of the document include discussion of nine of the
categories. The three categories not discussed are Public /Semi - Public, Manufactured
Home Park, and Mixed Use. The 35W interchange area of the Legacy at Woods Edge
and the Marketplace developments are the largest areas guided Mixed Use. The other is
the area northwest of the Hodgson/CR J intersection.
•
•
•
•
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 10
• Exhibit B of Resolution 05 -153 includes the text be added to the comprehensive plan,
at the end of the Land Use Plan chapter, on page 97. The text amendment describes
the Mixed Use category and lists examples of public purposes for guiding land for
Mixed Use. The proposed text also summarizes the Hardwood Creek project site
( "West Side of I- 35E "), and then makes it clear that the growth management policy
requirement has been addressed with this amendment to the comprehensive plan.
• Exhibit B of Resolution 05 -153 also includes text be added to the comprehensive plan
in the Planning District 6 section, on page 153. The comprehensive plan breaks the
city into planning districts. The Hardwood Creek site is in Planning District 6. The
future PUD application will be compared to the recommendations listed for Planning
District 6. However, some reference to this site and its Mixed Use designation is
appropriate.
(5) Text Amendment: The 147 Statement On Page 27 of Comprehensive Plan
The comprehensive plan includes a great number of goals, policies, objectives,
recommendations, and strategies. The Policy Plan chapter includes a list of growth
management goals and policies. Policy number nine is: "Limit residential growth to an
average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory." The growth
management ordinance, Ord. 24 -04, provides for amending the comprehensive plan if
this target is to be exceeded:
An amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if, in order to
accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth
(units /year)...would be exceeded (Section 2, par. 7.).
The amendment will include the description of the site in the Mixed Use section, as
explained above. However, in order to avoid confusion, it would be advisable to amend
the limiting statement itself to provide for the possibility of amendment described in the
growth management ordinance.
The text amendment includes four examples of public purposes that might justify
amending the comprehensive plan to allow growth to exceed the target. These four are
taken directly from the growth management ordinance. Incorporating them into the
comprehensive plan itself provides consistency between the comprehensive plan and the
growth management policy ordinance.
• Exhibit B of the Resolution 05 -153 includes text to amend the policy on page 27 of
the comprehensive plan.
(6) Text Review: Demographic Goals
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 11
The "Local Forecasts" section of the Land Use Plan chapter includes the growth goals for
the next decades: households, population, and employment. This statement is found on
page 63: "The goals assume an average of 147 new households annually through the
year 2020." This statement merits discussion.
To amend this statement raises the question of amending the growth projections, an
important part of planning the community's future. This will be extensively analyzed and
discussed as part of the overall review of the comprehensive plan that must be completed
by the end of year 2008.
• Therefore, we recommend no amendment to this statement in the comprehensive plan.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
The P & Z opened the public hearing on September 14 and continued it to a special
meeting on September 27 dealing exclusively with this application. The P & Z voted to
recommend adoption of the comprehensive plan amendments listed in Resolution 05 -153.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
The Environmental Board discussed the application on August 31. Because this is not an
actual plat application with specifics, the Board's recommendation is general: "The
Environmental Board supports the general environmental direction of the Village of
Hardwood Creek, realizing that there is a lot more to be done."
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The EDAC discussed the application on October 6th. EDAC unanimously recommended
that the City Council approve the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to mixed use.
EDAC also unanimously recommended that the City Council support the Planned Unit
Development concept plan, utilizing the Conservation Development Framework outlined
in the AUAR recommendations.
Members' message to the City Council is that EDAC supports this development as an
economic benefit to the city, but that the development should be held to Conservation
Development standards. Public benefits such as pedestrian access between the
commercial and residential development, trail access to areas outside the development,
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Hardwood Creek LLC
page 12
and appropriate recreational amenities for the residents living in the development are
elements of the final plan that should be required as the development moves forward
through the approvals process.
OPTIONS
i. Resolution 05 -153, Comprehensive Plan Amendment
1. Approve Resolution 05 -153 approving amendment of the comprehensive plan.
2. Deny Resolution 05 -153.
ii. PUD concept plan
Provide comment on the PUD concept plan.
RECOMMENDATION
i. Resolution 05 -153:
ii. PUD concept plan:
Option 1
Provide comment on the PUD concept plan.
It is important to note that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment does not
grant or imply any right to an approval of the PUD application that will follow. Design
specifics, including road alignments and unit types, will be part of a full PUD review.
•
•
•
•
Council Member
adoption:
introduced the following resolution and moved its
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 05 -153
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN T() AMEND THE PROPOSED LAND USE MAP, REQUEST 370 ACRES
OF MUSA, AND AMEND TEXT
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has adopted a Comprehensive Plan to guide
community growth in a rational and responsible manner through 2020; and
WHEREAS, MN Statutes 462.355 authorizes the governing body to amend the
comprehensive municipal plan; and
WHEREAS, the City received and application for a comprehensive plan amendment for
363+ acres for a site located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.);
and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing on
September 14th and 27th, 2005 and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan
amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the following amendments to the Comprehensive Plan:
The Proposed Land Use Plan is amended to guide the area of approximately 370 acres
to Mixed Use, as shown on the attached map "Proposed Amendment To Land Use
Plan (Detail)" (Exhibit A).
The amendment includes 370 acres of MUSA for the subject area. This MUSA is
applied to the site, not included in the MUSA reserve. The resulting MUSA line is
shown on the "Proposed Amendment" map (Exhibit A).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the text of the Comprehensive Plan is amended as
shown in Exhibit B.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that, with the conditions of
approval listed below, the application for a comprehensive plan amendment promote the
•
•
•
following public purposes, which are listed both for exceeding the 147 annual units
statement and the Mixed Use section:
a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such
as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations
designated for them in the comprehensive plan
In the Policy Plan section of the comprehensive plan, there are two specific
residential goals that relate to this application :
1. Provide a healthy variety of housing types, styles and choices to meet the
changing life cycle needs of the Lino Lakes Population.
3. Promote multiple family housing alternatives as an attractive life cycle
housing option.
The application will amend the plan to designate the site for multi- family as well
as single family development.
b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in
accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially
feasible without the project
The AUAR lays out a transportation framework to guide future planning. This
includes a local roadway system within development areas to avoid relying
entirely on CSAH 14 and CSAH 21 for traffic movement. The system framework
provides access to areas within the application site as well as to land north of the
site. This roadway system is vital to good transportation planning in the eastern
part of Lino Lakes. Development in the area will construct these streets and by
doing so build a major part of the needed transportation system as part of one
project. Smaller developments would not be able to create the system. and the
City will not be able to construct these streets.
In addition, Anoka County has identified the need to improve CSAH 21 to handle
projected traffic volumes. This project will provide resources to make significant
improvements to CSAH 21 because improvements will be needed in order for this
project to proceed.
The utilities (water and sanitary sewer) that will be constructed with this project
will include trunk lines planned to serve other property. Like the road system,
this will provide a large piece of the utility systems needed in this part of the city.
- 7 5 -
Resolution No. 05 -153, page 2
•
•
c) provision of environmental features that would not occur without exceeding the
target.
Master planning a large area creates the opportunity to lay out and create a large
open space system. Development in the subject area will create a large open
space including environmentally advantageous stormwater management elements,
native vegetation, and habitat areas that would not be possible with development
in smaller increments under different owners.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that, with the conditions of
approval listed below, the application for a comprehensive plan amendment complies the
following performance standards, which are required for development in areas guided for
Mixed Use:
1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding and uses in the
area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition, landscaping,
and site access.
The concept plan includes residential areas across from existing residential and
areas guided residential on the west side of CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). The concept
includes commercial development abutting land to the south guided for
commercial use. Specifics will be reviewed with a development application,
which must be consistent with these perfonnance standards.
2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and convenient
traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access management design
elements for access to arterial and collector roadways.
The site is within the area of the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide
Review (AUAR). The concept plan includes the collector roads and access points
laid out in the AUAR. This layout is intended to observe access management
guidelines and provide for safe, efficient movement. Specifics will be reviewed
with a development application, which must be consistent with these performance
standards and requirements of the AUAR mitigation plan.
3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available.
Water and sanitary sewer is available to the site and will be extended to serve the
site and land beyond.
4. AM development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site planning,
landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water management.
Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect and improve water
quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and other natural methods
whenever feasible.
- 76 -
Resolution No. 05 -153, page 3
•
The site is within the area of the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide
Review (AUAR). The Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) states in the
mitigation plan that the Conservation Development Framework is a fundamental
precept for all development within the AUAR area. Every project can and must
incorporate conservation development design and /or low impact development
techniques and be otherwise consistent with requirements of the AUAR
mitigation plan.
5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility, connections to
residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space to create a customer
friendly environment and promote a high level of interaction among local businesses
and between businesses and residents.
The concept plan includes a greenway system and interconnectivity. The details
of the site design will be reviewed with a development application, which must be
consistent with these performance standards.
6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically pleasing,
high quality buildings and streetscapes.
The details of the site design will be reviewed with a development application to
ensure compliance with this standard.
• BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this amendment of the comprehensive plan is
subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council, as required by MN Statute
473.
•
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this comprehensive plan amendment
does not grant or imply any right to an approval of a planned unit development,
preliminary plat, or any other application for development within the subject area.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following conditions of approval apply to
development in the subject area being guided Mixed Use:
1. A variety of single family and multi - family residential development will include a
maximum of 1150 dwelling units, and the net residential density is to be no greater
than 4.5 units per acre, when including all land not within the commercial area.
2. There will be significant open space.
3. There will be a minimum of 70 acres of commercial uses.
4. The subject area is within the I -35E AUAR area and therefore all development in the
subject area must be conservation development as required by the AUAR.
- 7 7 -
Resolution No. 05 -153, page 4
•
•
5. The stormwater management design must manage rates and quality using natural
infiltration and ecologically -based approaches, as required by the AUAR mitigation
plan, including but not limited to:
• infiltration through sheet flow, swales, rain gardens
• control of runoff rate
• control of runoff volume
• provide 1 -foot contours
• break up impervious surfaces
• disperse outflow from storm facilities (to create sheet flow, infiltration)
• stormwater management area slopes of 6:1 and 10:1 safety bench
6. Any approval of a PUD and/or preliminary plat in the area must include a phasing
plan based on infrastructure capacities.
7. Road improvements to provide adequate capacity for the project must be included as
part of the project approval.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of
2006.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2006.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
- 7 8 -
Resolution No. 05 -153, page 5
•
•
•
EXHIBIT A, RESOLUTION NO. 05 -153
AMENDMENT TO LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL)
LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
RURAL
LOW DENSI
UNSEWERED'
LOW DENSITY
SEWERED
RES I D:
•
•
•
EXHIBIT B, RESOLUTION NO. 05 -153
• The following text is to be added to the comprehensive plan, at the end of the Land
Use Plan chapter, on page 97:
MIXED USE
The Proposed Land Use Map designates several areas for "Mixed Use ". The
Mixed Use designation is intended to accommodate development that includes a
variety of land uses. This could be a development that integrates uses in the
same building, such as residential units above commercial space. It also might
include different uses in separate locations as elements of a larger development,
as part of a master plan. While it is possible that an appropriate development
project in a Mixed Use area could include only one type of land use, other land
use designations are available for development with only one type of and use.
Development in areas guided Mixed Use typically will take advantage of the
flexibility available with the use of a planned unit development. The City does not
require a PUD for development in a Mixed Use area. However, it is the preferred
design tool because development that includes a variety of uses typically will
pose challenges best addressed with the flexibility available with a PUD.
Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use should be
reserved for areas that have undergone significant environmental review.
Commercial development typically will require more impervious surface than
residential development, which raises stormwater management design
challenges. Traffic generation differs between different land uses. The Mixed
Use land use designation envisions varied and uses, and recognizes the
possibility of design challenges, including environmental impact issues. These
are best addressed with extensive environmental review.
Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use and
development with these areas should be reserved for development that promotes
clearly identified public purposes. Such purposes may include but are not limited
to:
a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing
goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in
locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan
b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in
accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not
financially feasible without the project
c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without the
project
•
•
d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without the
project
Development in areas guided Mixed Use must comply with the following
performance standards:
1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding land uses
in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition,
landscaping, and site access.
2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and
convenient traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access
management design elements for access to arterial and collector roadways.
3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available.
4. All development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site
planning, landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water
management. Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect
and improve water quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and
other natural methods whenever feasible.
5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility,
connections to residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space
to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of
interaction among local businesses and between businesses and residents.
6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically
pleasing, high quality buildings and streetscapes.
West Side of I -35E
A 370 -acre development site is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E
and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and
residential uses. The concept plan for the development includes 500,000 to
600,000 square feet of commercial space on 55 to 70 acres of the site. A variety
of single family and multi - family residential development will include a maximum
of 1150 dwelling units. The net residential density is to be approximately 4.5
units per acre, when including all land not within the commercial area. There will
be significant open space as well. While these are the approximate use
parameters, the specifics of development in this area are to be part of a master
plan using a planned unit development approach.
In the northeast corner of the site, a triangle is formed by I -35E, a pipeline, and
the property boundary. This area could be designed to accommodate an office
campus type use, which could be a suitable land use along the freeway. This
would reduce the amount of residential and noted above and increase the
commercial land. Such flexibility is appropriate to accommodate what will be
determined as the best use of the triangle area.
- 8 1 -
page 2 of Exhibit B, Resolution No. 05 -153
•
•
•
This site is included in the I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review
(AUAR) environmental analysis. Development must comply with the mitigation
plan that forms a part of the AUAR, which includes the Conservation
Development Framework as the fundamental precept for all development within
the AUAR area.
This area was guided Mixed Use with an amendment to the comprehensive plan
in 2006. This amendment was intended to fulfill the City's growth management
policy requirements that amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required
if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the targets for new
growth would be exceeded.
• The following text is to be added to the comprehensive plan in the Planning District
6 section, on page 153:
West Side of 1 -35E
A 370 -acre development site is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and
CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This site is to be developed with commercial and residential
uses. There will be significant open space as well. This site is described in the
Mixed Use section of the Land Use Plan chapter. The specifics of the development
are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit development approach.
• The policy on page 27 of the comprehensive plan is amended to read as follows:
9. Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year
supply lot inventory. Specific projects that are found to fulfill specified public
purposes may be considered justification for amending this comprehensive plan
to exceed this limit. The City Council shall consider such an amendment only if
the specific development project will promote a clearly identified public purpose.
The public purpose may include but is not limited to:
a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing
goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in
locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan
b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in
accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not
financially feasible without exceeding the target
c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without
exceeding the target
d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without
exceeding the target
- 8 2 -
page 3 of Exhibit B, Resolution No. 05 -153
•
•
Figure 1
Site Location
•
•
•
Figure 4
ZONING MAP DETAIL
RBR
-84-
•
•
-85-
c
cc
0°
LL G3
0
•
Figure 6
AUAR Figure 21-1: Existing and Proposed
Transportation Network
:4,4E
Mamma Inaveasi
TnimpoidlonSrdatrafesdangim
^.4-9114.7.4s,
41.14
■•■■••••11
SITE
Figure 21,4
Existing and Proposed Transportation tiletwor,
-86-
•
•
•
145E at Anoka SAH 14
fl ter ch an ge Concepts
Figure 7
CONCEPT 2
Diamond plus
northwest loop
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
ACTION REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA ITEM 6F
Michael Grochala
January 23, 2006
Consideration of Resolutions No. 06 -11
Revoking Municipal State Aid Street
Designation (Birch Street)
Simple Majority
In December of 2005 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 05 -207 approving the
designation CR 154 (Birch Street) from CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) to CR 54 (20th
Avenue S) as a County State Aid Highway. Prior to this approval the .75 mile segment
was included on the city's Municipal State Aid (MSA) system.
Staff is now requesting council authorization to revoke the MSA designation from this
road segment. By revoking the MSA status of the roadway the city will free up .75 miles
of its available mileage allocation for designation elsewhere in the City.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolutions No. 06 -11
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 06 -11
2. General Location Map
City Council
Revoking State Aid Street
January 23, 2006
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -11
RESOLUTION REVOKING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS
BIRCH ST (M.S.A. 210 -112 -010)
WHEREAS, It appears to the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that the road
hereinafter described as a Municipal State Aid Street under the provision of Minnesota
Laws;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA that the road described as follows, to -wit:
Birch Street from CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) to CR 54 (20th Avenue S). The
length of this segment is .75 miles.
be, and hereby is, revoked as a Municipal State Aid Street of said City subject to the
approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota.
• BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for
his consideration.
•
ATTEST:
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of January, 2006.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
- 8 9 -
Num
111 ME am
NE ■N
O.
ren -rv•I! ,
Etk --
a�Q
IV 1a
Atro maul
sae
o O untu
slis#c* 3.1111
14— t Nom
`:�a NM
r4W^ goi
0
a y�
411111211170 _ Or
1■.�►a. �� ; o CIA. AM
IP411 .4" IV' --,....,
`'I,,.,,,,,L
4^III •.�1.1i1C31�
i�.♦ ;;quo
Seri
Nei 11,1
Vtliter- o
i..::o:i''J
of
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 14, 2005
DRAFT
1 CITY OF LINO LADS
2 MINUTES
3
4
5 DATE : December 14, 2005
6 TIME STARTED : 5:35 p.m.
7 TIME ENDED : 9:17 p.m.
8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Carlson, Dahl,
9 Reinert (6:00 p.m.), Stoltz and Mayor
10 Bergeson
11 MEMBERS ABSENT : None
12
13 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Administration Director, Dan
14 Tesch (part); Community Development Director, Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim
15 Studenski (part); Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia (part); Finance Director, Al Rolek;
16 Community Development Coordinator, Mary Alice Divine (part); and City Planner, Jeff
17 Smyser (part)
18
19
20 YMCA UPDATE
21
22 Community Development Coordinator Divine introduced the representatives present from
23 the YMCA. She stated an update on the project was given at the last Council work
24 session as well as a review of the proposed site plan. The City Council expressed concern
25 regarding program,ning and whether or not the project meets the design standards. Staff
26 I has since,paet with the YMCA and had discussions with them. The representatives from -- toatr"ea en �r .
27 the YMCA are present this evening to present options and discuss the costs associated
28 with those options.
29
30 Mr. Tom Brinsco, President of the YMCA Greater St. Paul, stated he would like to
31 provide an update to the Council. He indicated the YMCA wants to move forward with
32 the project with the funds that are currently available. He stated he has two plans to
33 review this evening; one plan that the YMCA would like to move forward with in the
34 spring and an additional plan with added amenities.
35
36 Mr. Brinsco provided the background on three facilities that have been built in the past
37 ten years. He noted all three facilities were originally built smaller and added on to as
38 funding became available.
39
40 Mr. Brinsco reviewed the proposed plan and amenities' noting the building is
41 approximately 36,000 square feet. He advised the pool is a lap pool because they can
42 easily program a lap pool. The cost of the proposed plan is $6.5 million dollars.
43
44 Community Development Director Grochala advised the Planning and Zoning Board has
45 not yet reviewed the current proposed plan.
Formak ed C�nte� d lama
r�i�Z�Yr.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DECEMBER 14, 2005
DRAFT
1
2 Mr. Brinsco reviewed the second plan pointing out the additional amenities including a
3 zero depth pool. The second plan adds an additional 13,000 — 14,000 square feet and
4 would cost between $9 and $9.3 million dollars.
5
6 Mr. Brinsco stated the YMCA is a very willing partner with the City and recognizes the
7 cost difference between the two plans. The City does have a strong commitment from the
8 YMCA. The YMCA is ready to move forward with the first plan.
9
10 Community Development Director Grochala stated there are options that could be
11 explored to finance the gap between the two plans. The City has to determine if those
12 options should be explored or if the City should move forward with the proposed plan.
13
14 Ms. Kim Sullivan, YMCA Board, stated she believes the plan does reach the goal of the
15 bringing a YMCA to the community. She stated the Board is willing to do more fund
16 raising but hopes the City is willing to move forward with the first plan.
17
18 Mayor Bergeson asked the YMCA to continue to explore opportunities to get closer to
19 the expanded second plan. He stated he believes the City has a long -term expectation of
20 getting to the expanded plan. Therefore, if the City moves forward with the first plan it
21 I should be built to i11ow future expansions. He added the City does take the approved g�ele�e
22 Design Standards very seriously. He stated he hopes the YMCA will continue to work s'
-�- nolii
23 with staff on that issue. He requested the Council receive another update fairly soon.
24
25
26 1 FUNDIRANFER RESOLUTION (Referred by Councilmember Carlson from '�'l"�' z ^��" �
27 Council Meeting of 12/12/05) oeleEdi;SiYNSOR�
28
29 Consideration of Resolution No. 05 —187, Authorizing the Transfer of Funds From
30 the Area and Unit Fund to the 2003A G.O. Improvement and Refunding Bond Debt
31 Service Fund
32
33 Consideration of Resolution No. 05 —188, Authorizing the Transfer of Funds From
34 the Area and Unit Fund to the Water Operating Fund for Payment of 1996E G.O.
35 Water Revenue Fund
36
37 Consideration of Resolution No. 05 —189, Authorizing the Transfer of Funds From
38 the Area and Unit Fund to the 1998A G.O. Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund
39
40 Consideration of Resolution No. 05 —190, Authorizing the Transfer of Funds From
41 the Area and Unit Fund to the 1999A G.O. Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund
42
43 Finance Director Rolek advised there were questions on the above items at the last
44 Council meeting. He explained the balance of the Area and Unit Fund fluctuates every
45 year. It was anticipated when these bonds were issued 15 years ago that the Area and
46 Unit fund would pay for them.
"4, k
r
ar
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DECEMBER 14, 2005
DRAFT
1
2 Finance Director Rolek answered questions from the Council and outlined the bond debt
3 fund process. He noted if projects are not assessed up front the City has to carry the costs
4 for the project.
5
6 1 These items will appear on the Consent agenda for the City Council Meeting on Monday,
7 December 19, 2005, 6:30 p.m.
8
9 The City Council recessed the regular work session for a closed meeting on a confidential
10 personnel matter with an attomey at 6:42 p.m.
11
12 Mayor Bergeson reconvened the regular Council work session at 7:53 p.m.
13
14 REQUESTS FOR RESOLUTION /SUPPORT RELATED TO FOREST LAKE
15 ANNEXATION/TOWN OF COLUMBUS INCORPORATION (Referred by
16 Council Member Carlson from Council Meeting 12/12/05)
17
18 Councilmember Dahl advised she requested this item be placed on the work session
19 agenda. She stated she had invited representatives from Columbus Township to the
20 meeting and they were present earlier.
21
22 City Administrator Heitke stated there has been a lot of miscommunication regarding this
23 issue. Representatives from Columbus Township were emailed regarding the meeting
24 tonight. He stated those representatives would be present at the January 4, 2006 Council
25 work session.
26
27 City Administrator Heitke explained this item would have been on a future meeting
28 agenda if the Council had indicated they would consider the request at the last Council
29 work session.
30
31 Councilmember Stoltz stated staff should handle all agenda items and coordinate
32 representatives at meetings for all issues. That is the staff's job and all members of the
33 City Council should be on the same page and provide a united front. Individual
34 Councihnember's should not invite representatives for any issue. He stated if Columbus
35 Township was invited the City of Forest Lake should also have been invited to make a
36 presentation.
37
38 City Administrator Heitke stated this issue was only placed on the last work session
39 agenda to obtain Council direction. There are specific state statutes for incorporation and
40 1 annexation. Staff does not feel that there would be a, "relationship and effect" from either
41 proposed action to Lino Lakes and therefore finds no compelling reason to enter into
42 incorporation or annexation proceedings.
43
44 The Council directed staff to invite both the City of Forest Lake and Columbus Township
45 to the January 4, 2006 Council work session.
3
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
DECEMBER 14, 2005
•
onifiattRd C 2iti$ered r�„ ak �-
2 REINERT RESOLUTION: INTRODUCTION OF RESOLUTION BY
3 COUNCILMEMBER REINERT REQUESTING THAT DECISION RESOURCES
4 DEVELOP AND INCLUDE A QUESTION ON THE SURVEY THAT WOULD
5 ASK RESIDENTS IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A REFERENDUM ON
6 THE QUESTION OF FUNDING FOR A VIICENGS STADIUM
7
8 City Administrator Heitke advised he received a request from two Councilmembers to
9 place this item on the agenda.
10
11 Councilmember Reinert distributed and reviewed the draft Reinert Resolution supporting
12 the additional of a question to the City survey regarding the Viking stadium funding. He
13 stated the resolution is a way to find out how residents feel about the Vilcings stadium
14 sales tax issue.
15
16 UPDATE ON CURRENT STATUS OF COMMUNITY SURVEY
17
18 City Administrator Heitke advised he did speak with Decision Resources about the
19 proposed question. They have indicated they can add the question to the City survey.
20
21 The City Council determined they would like to review the added question to the survey
22 as well as the previous changes discussed by the Council. The proposed question will be
23 forwarded to the Council. Councilmembers will confirm they are comfortable with the
24 format of the question. If there are no objections, staff would advice Decision Resources
25 to move forward with the survey.
26
27 Reinert Resolution was added to the regular Council agenda Monday, December 19,
28 2006, 6:30 p.m.
29
30 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
31
32 Item 2B, Consideration of Resolution No. 05 — 202, Adopting the 2006 General
33 Operating Budget — Councilmember Dahl and Councilmember Carlson requested new
34 copies of the entire proposed budget.
35
36 Mayor Bergeson suggested at a future meeting the Council receive an update from the
37 Tax Assessor regarding tax valuations.
38
39 There were no other changes to the regular Council agenda.
40
41 � Councilmember Stoltz requested a uniform police officer attend future Council meetings
42 until further notice. He explained his reason for the request is the tone of the last meeting
43 and threats made to City staff. He advised his request could be voted on at the Council
44 meeting or the Council could informally agree to his request.
45
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 14, 2005
DRAFT
1 Councilmember Carlson stated she does not believe a uniform police officer should
2 attend Council meetings. She indicated she believes the City may be overreacting to the
3 situation.
4
5 Mayor Bergeson stated the City has to be concerned about the safety of staff. He stated
6 the situation really shook up some staff members,
7
8 Councilmember Reinert stated he is supportive of having a uniform police officer at
9 Council meetings and is willing to add the request to the regular agenda or informally
10 agree to the request.
11
12 Councilmember Carlson stated she does believe in a police investigation and protecting
13 staff. However, she does not informally support having a uniform police officer at
14 Council meetings.
15
16 Councilmember Dahl stated she does not know if there is a need for a uniform police
17 officer or not, but if two Councilmembers are requesting it she is agreeable.
18
19 Councilmember Carlson stated she did not see this item on the agenda so she has not had
20 time to think about the request. She stated she does want to protect employees and
21 suggested having a uniform police officer at meetings when there is a major issue on the
22 agenda.
23
24 No clear direction was given from the Council regarding this issue.
25
26 The meeting was adjoumed at 9:17 p.m.
27
28 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
29 January 9, 2006.
30
31
32
33
34 (City Clerk
35 John Bergeson, Mayor oe et dui, ' e B„W
xkFar„tna o f gntKt,4 A
36 Transcribed by:
37 Kim Points
38 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
39
40
1 CITY OF LINO LAKES
2 MINUTES
3
4
5 DATE : December 19, 2005
6 TIME STARTED : 6 :35 P.M.
7 TIME ENDED : 7:59 P.M.
8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmembers Carlson, Dahl, Reinert, Stoltz
9 and Mayor Bergeson
10 MEMBERS ABSENT : None
11
12 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Community Development Director,
13 Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; Finance Director, Al Rolek; Police Chief, Dave
14 Pecchia; City Attorney, Barry Sullivan.
15
16 OPEN MIKE
17
18 There was none.
19
20 SETTING THE AGENDA
21
22 Mayor Bergeson presented a Dedication of Service to the City plaque to Councilmember Dahl.
23 Councilmember Dahl stated it has been a pleasure serving City residents.
24
25 The agenda was accepted,. tine tea �5 M:
26 4 i g�!�'`
27 CONSENT AGENDA
28
29 Councilmember Dahl moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the
30 motion.
31
32 Motion carried unanimously.
33
34 ITEM ACTION
35
36 A. CONSIDERATION OF EXPENDITURES:
37
38 i) December 19, 2005 (Check No. 75556 —
39 75602, $242,423.61) Approved
40
41 ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14986 —
42 14996, $3,102.47) Approved
43
44 B. FUND TRANSFER RESOLUTIONS:
45
COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 19, 2005
DRAFT
136 Motion carried unanimously.
137
'38 Resolution No. 05 -204 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
39
140 E. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -205, Amending the 2005 General Operating Budget
141
142 Finance Director Rolek summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
143
144 Councilmember Stoltz moved to adopt Resolution No. 05 -205, Amending the 2005 General
145 Operating Budget. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion.
146
147 Motion carried unanimously.
148
149 Resolution No. 05 -205 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
150
151 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH
152
153 A. Consideration of 2006 -2007 Contract with Local 49
154
155 City Administrator Heitke summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
156
157 Mayor Bergeson asked about having all union contracts on the same cycle. City Administrator Heitke
158 replied Staff is in negotiations to make this happen and hopes to bring them forward in January.
159
160 I Councilmember Dahl moved to approve the 2006 -2007 Contract with Local 49. Councilmember (hhe. ted oon as ; , t . I h
161 Reinert seconded the motion.
162
163 Motion carried unanimously.
164
165 B. Staff Resignation
.66
167 City Administrator Heitke summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
168
169 Mayor Bergeson moved to accept the Staff resignation. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion.
170
171 Motion carried 3 -2. Carlson and Dahl nay.
172
173 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA
174
175 There was none.
176
177 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER
178
179 There was none.
180
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
DECEMBER 19, 2005
181 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT. MICHAEL GROCHALA
182
183 A. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -200, Approving Change Order No. 2 and Final
84 Payment, 2005 Surface Water Management Project, Jim Studenski
185
186 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval.
187
188 Councilmember Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 05 -200, Approving Change Order No. 2 and
189 Final Payment, 2005 Surface Water Management Project. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the
190 motion.
191
192 Motion carried unanimously.
193
194 Resolution No. 05 -200 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
195
196 B. Public Hearing and Consider FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 14 -05, Vacating
197 Drainage and Utility Easement and Accepting Replacement Easement, Lot 1, Block 2,
198 Pheasant Hills Preserve 9th Addition, Jeff Smyser
199
200 Community Development Coordinator Grochala summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff
201 recommends approval.
202
203 Mayor Bergeson opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m.
204
205 There was no one wishing to speak.
206
207 Mayor Bergeson closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m.
208
209 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the FIRST READING of Ordinance No, 14 -05, Vacating
210 Drainage and Utility Easement and Accepting Replacement Easement, Lot 1, Block 2, Pheasant Hills
111 Preserve 9th Addition. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion.
_ 212
213 Motion carried. Councilmember Carlson voted yea. Councilmember Dahl voted yea.
214 Councilmember Reinert voted yea. Councilmember Stoltz voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea.
215
216 C. Anoka County State Aid Highway Revisions, Michael Grochala
217 .. _
218 i. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -206, Designating CR 54 (20th Avenue S) from
219 I -35E to CSAH 14 (Main Street) within the Cities of Centerville and Lino Lakes
220 as County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 54
221
222 Community Development Director Grochala summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff
223 recommends approval.
224
5
COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 19, 2005
DRAFT
225 Councilmember Carlson asked if there will be changes other than state designation and funding.
226 Community Development Director Grochala replied no.
?27
28 Councilmember Dahl asked if the City would be involved in future road happenings. Community
229 Development Director Grochala replied roadway reconstruction needs municipal consent.
230
231 ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -207, Designating CR 154 (Birch St) from
232 CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) to CR 54 (20th Avenue S) within the City of Lino
233 Lakes as County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 154
234
235 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 05 -206, Designating CR 54 (20th Avenue S)
236 from 1 -35E to CSAH 14 (Main Street) within the Cities of Centerville and Lino Lakes as County State
237 Aid Highway (CSAH) 54 and to adopt Resolution No. 05 -207, Designating CR 154 (Birch Street)
238 from CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) to CR 54 (20th Avenue S) within the City of Lino Lakes as County
239 State Aid Highway (CSAH) 154. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion.
240
241 Motion carried unanimously.
242
243 Resolutions No. 05 -206 and No. 05 -207 can be found in the City Clerk's office.
244
245 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
246
247 There was none.
248
249 NEW BUSINESS
250
251 A. Consideration of Resolution No. 05 -208, the Reinert Resolution Supporting the Addition
252 of a Question to the City Survey regarding Viking Stadium Funding
253
254 Councilmember Reinert summarized,his proposed resolution,C
255
256 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05 -208, the Reinert Resolution Supporting
257 the Addition of a Question to the City Survey regarding Viking Stadium Funding. Councilmember
258 Stoltz seconded the motion.
259
260 I Councilmember Carlson stated the survey should also go to the Legislature, which passed the state
261 statute requiring a referendum. She proposed an amendment to the motion, `Now Therefore, Be It
262 Further Resolved, that the City of Lino Lakes will forward the results of this survey to the Minnesota
263 State Legislature, House and Senate, for their consideration and review ". Councilmember Dahl
264 seconded the motion.
265
266 Councilmember Reinert stated he would support the amendment, noting the resolution allows the
267 citizens of Lino Lakes to have a voice.
268
6
41 eRorc g� qua "•
�
e[ed flicaang; ggecammeaa
COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 19, 2005
DRAFT
269 Councilmember Stoltz stated he has no problem with the amendment. He added the survey,
270 conducted by an independent third party, will be public.
271
72 Amendment carried unanimously.
273
274 Councilmember Reinert stated the survey is under way and Council should receive the results for
275 approval sometime in January, which is before the legislature goes into session. City Administrator
276 Heitke replied Decision Resources would like to present the results in mid to late February.
277
278 Councilmember Carlson stated residents actions have brought results; citizens need to be heard and it
279 is the Council's role to stand up for its' citizens.
280
281 Councilmember Stoltz stated many residents were not notified this item was going to be discussed at
282 the Council meeting; however, with this resolution there is no special interest.
283
284 Councilmember Dahl stated the survey will reach only 400 of 20,000 residents, and she would have
285 liked it to be broader.
286
287 Councilmember Reinert stated he was concerned about the 400 number; however, the survey group,
288 that does this for a living, advised this number would provide the best results.
289
290 Councilmember Carlson stated she has confidence in the survey and believes this is the most effective
291 way to act as Council.
292
293 Motion carried unanimously.
294
295 COMMUNITY CALENDAR DECEMBER 20, 2005 THROUGH JANUARY 9, 2006:
296
297 A) Friday, December 23, 2005, City Hall Closed
98 B) Monday, December 26, 2005, City Hall Closed
299 C) Friday, December 30, 2005, City Hall Closed
300
301 D) Monday, January 2, 2006, City Hall Closed
302 E) Tuesday, January 3, 2006; 6:30 p.m., Park Board Meeting
303 F) Wednesday, January 4, 2006, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session
304 G) Thursday, January 5, 2006, 7:00 a.m., EDAC Meeting
305 H) Monday, January 9, 2006, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting
306
7
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
DECEMBER 19, 2005
307 ADJOURN
308
309 There being no further business, Councilmember Dahl moved to adjourn at 7:59 pan. Councilmember
10 Stoltz seconded the motion.
311
312 Motion carried unanimously.
313
314 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, January 9, 2006.
315
316
317
318
319 I City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
320
321 Transcribed by:
322 Cheryl Felix
323 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
324
8
- 10 1 -
kk4iiP:6.7410:04:iivotEA
1(>
SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DRAFT
1
2
3
4
5
6 DATE
7 TIME STARTED
8 TIME ENDED
9 MEMBERS PRESENT
10
11 MEMBERS ABSENT
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 8, 2005
: September 8, 2005
. 6:00 p.m.
. 11:55 p.m.
: Councilmember Carlson, Dahl,
Reinert, Stoltz, and Mayor Bergeson
: None
Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Community Development
Director, Mike Grochala; Finance Director, Al Rolek; Director of Administration, Dan
Tesch; Public Services Director, Rick DeGardner; and Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia
Mayor Bergeson advised the meeting is a continuation of the budget meeting of August
30, 2005. At that meeting, the majority of the Council did not want to increase the tax
rate so the proposed budget needs to be reduced by $389,000. Each Councilreinber was
to prepare a list of possible reductions to discuss this evening. Mayor Bergeson stated
that he; Councilmember Reinert and Councilmember Stoltz submitted a list. Mayor
Bergeson suggested. the Council review each list.
Finance Director Rolek advised, per Council directive, at the budget work session held on
August 30, staff' submitted adjustments in three tiers that totaled $500,900. The
adjustments were proposed in revenue areas as well as in expenditure areas. The first and
second tiers adjusted the budget by $389,258, which would lower the tax levy sufficiently
to achieve a level tax rate from 2005 to 2006. The third tier added adjustments of
$111,642. After reviewing the staff proposed adjustments, the Council withdrew the
following proposals:
32
33
34
35 Total staff adjustments
36 For level tax rate
37
38 Visioning Process
39 Secretarial Services
40 Trails
41 Total Withdrawn
42
43 Revised Tier I & II
44
Tier l Tier II Tier III
$122,053 $267,205 $389,258
(35,000)
(18,870)
(10,000)
(63,870)
$ 58,183
1
- 1 0 2 -
(35,000)
(18,870)
(40,000) (50,000)
(40,000) (103,870)
$227,205 $285,388
SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 8, 2005
DRAFT
1 Finance Director Rolek stated it was decided that each Councilmember would review the
2 budget and submit further recommendation for adjustments to get to a level or reduced
3 tax rate by noon on Tuesday, September 6, and that the recommendation would be
4 emailed to all Councilmembers. The following is a recap of staffs interpretation of the
5 Council submissions for additional budget adjustments:
6
7 Mayor Bergeson
8 Visioning $10,000 — Tier I
9 Secretarial Services 18,870 — Tier I
10 Trails 25,000 — Tier II
11 Police Capital Outlay 14,800 — Tier III
12 Personal Svc Recreation 39,000 — Tier III
13 Total Adjustments S107.670
14
15 Councilmember Stoltz
16 Visioning $10,000 — Tier I
17 Secretarial Services 18,870 — Tier I
18 Trails 25,000 — Tier II
19 Personal Svc Recreation 24,000 — Tier III
20 Contingency — to — 0- 25,000 — New
21 Total Adjustments $102,870
22
23 Councilmember Reinert
24 Visioning $10,000 — Tier I
25 Time Savers 18,870 - Tier I
26 All Tier III Except
27 Recreation 72,642 — Tier III
28 Council Salaries 3,000 —New
29 Total Adjustments $104,512
30
31 Finance Director Rolek noted staff received no adjustment list from Councilmember
32 Carlson. Councilmember Dahl indicated she still had too many unanswered questions
33 since the budget work session to submit a list of adjustments.
34
35 Councilmember Reinert suggested that the three submitted budget recommendations be
36 compared, noting areas of agreement and areas of differences discussed for possible
37 compromise.
38
39 Council discussed possible alternative budget reductions in detail. Finance Director
40 Rolek provided additional information on fund balance history, tax capacity, rate history
41 and the Comprehensive Plan policy regarding the future tax rate as requested by
42 Councilmember Carlson.
43
44 Councilmember Carlson referred to the Comprehensive Plan provision that the City's tax
45 rate should be reduced by 20% by the year 2020. Finance Director Rolek stated that was
2
- 1 0 3 -
SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 8, 2005
DRAFT
1 probably an unrealistic goal as the Comprehensive Plan was written in the late 1990's and
2 adopted by the City Council in 2001. The tax rate at the time the Comprehensive Plan
3 was adopted was approximately 35.9 %. The next year the state legislature shifted class
4 rates and state aid payments and assumed funding responsibility for general education.
5 As a result, the school district tax rate was reduced significantly and the City tax rate
6 increased to 53.1 %. The result on property owners was a tax reduction for that tax year.
7
8 Councihnember Stoltz inquired about a comparable rate for the Comprehensive Plan,
9 given the shift of funds by the legislature. Finance Director Rolek advised that under the
10 funding and class rate shifts, a tax rate of about 36% would be comparable to the 20%
11 stated in the Comprehensive Plan. Under the new scenario, the City would need to
12 decrease the tax rate about 1% per year to achieve a 36% tax rate in 2020 (53% - 36% =
13 17 %, over an 18 year period).
14
15 Finance Director Rolek noted the City's tax rate for 2005 was 42.223 %, which was well
16 below the projected rate of 49% to achieve a 36% rate by 2020 (2005 -2001 = 4 years.
17 53 %- 4 % =49 %).
18
19 Council discussed the differences in the three recommendations further resulting in a
20 compromised budget plan. Major differences in the two plans including the funding
21 levels for contracted secretarial services, street maintenance and the construction of new
22 trails. A detailed discussion was held on spending approximately $20,000 per year for
23 contracted meeting minutes and the need for detailed or verbatim minutes.
24
25 Council determined that the costs for contracted minutes for advisory boards would be
26 eliminated, as existing staff will record the minutes. Council meeting minutes would
27 continue to be contracted out. The minutes taken by staff would be in detail for public
28 hearings and if any Councilmember is not satisfied with the detail of public hearing
29 minutes it would be discussed by the Council.
30
31 After further discussion, a compromised budget from the two alternative budget plans
32 was proposed. This proposal consisted of the following cuts:
33
34 Roads $ 47,500
35 Secretarial Services $ 7,200
36 Tier 111 Parks $ 24,000
37 Contingency Fund $ 14,000
38 Capital Equipment $ 27,000
39 Trails $ 20,000
40 Total Additional Adjustment $139,700
41 First Adjustments $285,388
42
43 TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $425,088
44
3
-104-
SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 8, 2005
DRAFT
1 Given the total adjustments, the tax rate would be reduced from the 2005 rate of 42.223%
2 to an estimated rate of 42.00 %.
J
4 All Councilmembers agreed to support the compromise budget at the regular Council
5 meeting on September 12, 2005, 6:30 p.m.
6
7 The meeting was adjourned at 11:55 p.m.
8
9 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
10 October 10, 2005.
11
12
13
14
15 Acting City Clerk Jolm Bergeson, Mayor
16
17
18
19 Transcribed by:
20 Kin Points
21 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
22
23
4
-105-
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
v '
DRAFT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
JANUARY 4, 2006
{Wol3atettesl Centeretl .. S
: January 4, 2006
. 5:35 p.m.
. 10:10 p.m.
: Councilmember Carlson, O'Donnell,
Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson
. Stoltz
Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Community Development
Director, Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski (part); Chief of Police, Dave
Pecchia (part); Community Development Coordinator, Mary Alice Divine (part); and City
Planner, Jeff Smyser (part); and City Clerk, Julianne Bartell
STORM WATER UTILITY
Community Development Director Grochala advised incorporated into the Pavement
Management Policies, adopted by the City Council in 2005, was the provision to pursue
the establishment of a Storm Water Utility. The intent of the Storm Utility is to create a
dedicated funding source for storm water related components of the street reconstruction
program. The utility can also be used to fund water quality improvement projects and to
maintain compliance with mandatory programs such as the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) programs.
Community Development Director Grochala stated Short, Elliot, Hedrickson (SEH), Inc.,
has submitted a proposal to complete the feasibility study not to exceed a cost of $18,000.
The report will review the basis behind a Storm Water Utility and its advantages, review
of existing storm water utility rates in communities of similar size and propose a utility
system methodology and rate structure to meet the City's anticipated storm water
program costs. In addition to the writtenreport, the proposal also includes two Public
Education/Awareness meetings as well as preparation of an informationbrochure.
Community Development Director Grochala stated SEH has an extensive background in
working with municipalities to create storm water utilities. Additionally, one of the key
components of developing the utility is the use of the City's existing Geographic
Information System (GIS) data. SEH has worked extensively with the City's data and this
familiarity will streamline the evaluation process and result in a cost savings for the City.
Mr. Ron Leaf, SEH, reviewed the process for the project noting the key elements of a
storm water utility feasibility study. He stated SEH has done many of these studies and is
very familiar with them.
1
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 4, 2006
DRAFT
1 Mr. Leaf explained the tasks related to the project including the feasibility study and public
2 education and awareness. The main components of the study could be completed this year
3 and provide a plan to implement by January 2007.
4
5 Mx. Andy Lamberson, SEH, distributed an Executive Summary in terms of the Storm
6 Water Program Costs completed for the City of Barron. He reviewed the revenue
7 forecast noting the revenue is based on usage.
8
9 Mr. Lamberson indicated he prefers a utility based on user pay as opposed to a higher
to property tax that pays for storm water costs. He stated creating a utility also lowers costs
11 to the City.
12
13 This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, January 9, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
14
15 LEGACY STREETSCAPE DESIGN
16
17 Commmnity Development Director Grochala stated plans are being prepared for approval
18 of the Legacy Streetscape Design. He stated the City is anticipating going out for bids on
19 the project in early February 2006.
20
21 Mr. Bob Moiety, SEH, stated they will be reviewing the plans this evening and would like
22 Council input on the proposal
23
24 ( Mr. Bob Cost, Landscape Architect, SEH, advised the design to date is based onprevious
25 work that has been done on the project. He reviewed the proposed landscape plan in
26 detail and provided recommendations in terms of maintenance of the landscaping. He also
27 reviewed the park area and water area in terms of the landscaping plan. He noted the park
28 area is the focal point of the project.
29
30 Mr. Ken Tallen, SEH, reviewed the proposed lighting plan indicating the main goal is to
31 adequately light the area at night.
32
33 Mr. Morley advised the bid would include installation and maintenance of the lighting
34 system.
35
36 HARDWOOD CREEK DEVELOPMENT
37
38 City Planner Smyser advised the City received an application from Village of Hardwood
39 Creek, LLC, to amend the Comprehensive Plan. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment
40 requires a formal vote. The application also includes a general concept plan for planned
41 unit development. The concept plan review is informal and does not require a vote. It is
42 important to note that approval of this Comprehensive Plan Amendment does not grant or
43 imply any right to an approval of the PUD application that likely will follow.
{go matted _Cehte4
44
2
Deleted~ §F
r .j
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 4, 2006
DRAFT
1 City Planner Smyser stated the 2004 growth management policy (Ordinance 24 -04) was
2 prepared to implement the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The growth management
3 policy requires that several issues be addressed if the City is to accommodate this
4 application. This project application is the first one that requires an amendment to the
5 Comprehensive Plan as directed by the growth management ordinance. Review of the
6 relevant parts of the Comprehensive Plan resulted in recommendations to add or change
7 several passages. The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would involve a number of
8 elements.
9
10 City Planner Smyser stated the application does not include a planned unit development or
11 preliminary plat. It does not include the detailed information normally part of such
12 applications. Because of this, staff cannot analyze the project to see if it would qualify for
13 the exemptions to certain growth management limits as a conservation development. In
14 addition, there are some limits from which the City cannot grant exemptions. Therefore, a
15 Comprehensive Plan Amendment is needed to address growth issues as well as change the
16 land use designation for the site.
17
18 City Planner Smyser reviewed the three parts of the plan amendment directly relating to
19 I the application: changing the land use, adding MUSA, and addressing the growth
20 management issues. Because the Comprehensive Plan is a citywide document, the City
21 needs to ensure that amendments to the document support future planning needs in this
22 I area and elsewhere in the City. He jviewed the proposed land use map change.
•3
24 City Planner Smyser stated it is important to note that approval of this Comprehensive
25 Plan Amendment does not grant or imply any right to an approval of the PUD application
26 that will follow. Design specifics, including road alignments, will be part of a full PUD
27 review.
28
29 City Planner Smyser added the deadline for City action was scheduled to be December 13,
30 2005. However, the applicant requested that the action be postponed to the January 9,
31 2006 meeting. The City Council must take action on the application unless the applicant
32 grants an extension.
33
34 City Planner Smyser reviewed the text amendments in detail that will be added to the
35 Comprehensive Plan. He noted the changes are site specific. He stated the proposed
36 Comprehensive Plan Amendments were sent to surrounding communities to allow for the
37 opportunity to comment. He distributed a copy of the responses received by the cities of
38 Blaine, North Oaks and Centerville.
39
40 The Council discussed possible language changes to the proposed Comprehensive Plan
41 Amendment. It was noted that staff would provide an update on possible language
42 changes in the Friday packets.
43
44 This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, Jam,ary 9, 2006, 6:30 p.m.
45
Foen `ted CP�tered �_>
leted rei edto
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 4, 2006
DRAFT Palm jtte¢ ehter�d 4J
1 COMMUNITY SURVEY UPDATE
2
3 City Administrator Heitke advised at the November 28, 2005 special work session, the
4 Council reviewed and approved the questions for the community survey. On December
5 19, 2005, the Council approved having Decision Resources, Inc. add to the survey to
6 determine public opinion on Anoka County holding a referendum prior to the
7 implementation of a county -wide sales tax to partially fund a sports stadium Decision
8 Resources Ltd. (DRL) has drafted questions to ascertain public opinion on that issue.
9 City Administrator Heitke advised this week, staff from the Anoka County Library System
10 inquired as to whether it would be possible to survey the public's interest in having a
11 county library as part of the Legacy at Wood's Edge Project. Since this question is very
12 similar to the one contained in the 1996 survey related to having a YMCA in the town
13 center project, DRL offered to draft the question for consideration.
14
15 City Administrator Heitke reviewed the draft questions regarding the proposed stadium
16 I and a library in the Town Center at the 7iake Drive and Interstate 35 -W interchange area.
17 Staff is seeking Council acceptance of additional questions, enabling DRL to finalize the
18 survey.
19
20 Councilmember Carlson expressed concern that the proposed stadium question does not
21 address the referendum question. She distributed two alternative questions, one prepared
22 by her and another prepared by Mr. Dan Dobson of St. Paul Connrilmember Carlson
23 stated that her question makes the referendum issue more clear and coincides with the
24 Reinert Resolution.
25
26 Mr. Ron Holch addressed the Council and stated that the survey had been described as
27 being "scientific" in the newspaper, but the proposed question isn't scientific because it is
28 not quantifiable.
29
30 Councilmnmber Reinert stated that it's obvious that this process is going to be attacked
31 and suggested that all the Council can do is forward the results of this discussion to
32 Decision Resources and see what they come up with, however, it will delay the survey and
33 results.
34
35 Councilmember Carlson stated that the County Commissioner in Lino Lakes was quite
36 surprised by the wording of the question.
37
38 Mayor Bergeson stated he is concerned that survey questions that the Council hasn't even
39 acted on are being passed out. He is concerned that there is clearly an effort underway to
40 prepare people for the survey by letting them know what the questions might be and
41 coaching them on answers, and the longer the City waits to conduct the survey the less
42 accurate it is going to be. He stated he is in agreement with the stadium question as
43 proposed by Decision Resources, Inc.
44
4
-109-
eletei
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 4, 2006
DRAFT
1 City Administrator Heitke stated staifwould capture from the tape what has been said and
2 send it to Decision Resources, Inc. so they can respond to the concerns about the
3 proposed question.
4
5 Ms. Barbara Bor, resident of Lino Lakes, came forward and read a letter she drafted
6 regarding the library question. She noted the letter would be sent to all of the County
7 Commissioners. The letter outlined the benefits of having a public library within the City.
8 She also indicated her family may donate land for the project. She asked that the library
9 question on the survey not be area specific.
10
11 Council directed staff to take the library question back to the Library Board with
12 comments regarding the question being area specific.
13
14 City Administrator Heitke distributed an email from the Chair of the Environmental Board
15 requesting that they or the Environmental Board's staff review and have input on the
16 survey questions. The Council agreed that other advisory boards were not involved in the
17 survey and that the Council had already approved the survey.
18
19 Community Development Director Grochala advised there are several questions on the
20 survey that relate to environmental issues.
21
22 City Administrator Heitke reiterated the fact that in early discussions, Decision Resources
23 had inquired about whether there were any big issues that might come up that could sway
24 the results of the survey and they like to time surveys to avoid this. He stated that
25 Decision Resources was aware of the guest editorial in the Pioneer Press and he did send
26 articles from the newspaper regarding the survey, growth issues, stadium issue, and the
27 letter to the editor on growth and suggesting how to respond to the survey. Decision
28 Resources knows that the City does not want to delay the survey, so they may add a
29 qualifying statement to the survey report that the results may have been affected by pre -
30 survey publicity. City Administrator Heitke added that people have been requesting
31 copies of the survey and since it is public data, he has to provide it.
32
33 Mayor Bergeson called for a short break at 8:56 p.m.
34
35 Mayor Bergeson reconvened the meeting at 9:14 p.m
36
37 2006 ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS
38
39 Council Anuointments — Mayor Bergeson advised the Council needs to finalise the
40 recommended appointments.
41 The Council reviewed the appointments and made the following changes:
42
43 Acting Mayor Councilmember O'Donnell
44 Centennial Fire Steering Councilmember Carlson and Reinert
45 County Corrections Program Councilmember Stoltz
5
- 1 1 0 -
l 0.toig . „ :spentei4d.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 4, 2006
DRAFT F,ormatEe� CenteF
1 Joint Law Enforcement Committee Councilmember Reinert
2
3 Councilmember O'Donnell suggested the Council eliminate Council liaisons and schedule
4 regular meetings with each City Board. The Council agreed.
5
6 Advisory Board Appointments — City Administrator Heitke suggested the Council
7 extend the application period for City Advisory Boards and advertise the positions again.
8
9 The Council agreed to advertise the Advisory Board openings again and extend the
10 application period for a few weeks. It is anticipated that interviews would be conducted in
11 February.
12
13 Schedule of Meetinns — City Administrator Heitke advised a proposed schedule of 2006
14 meetings was included in the Council packets. He stated the only change to the meetings
15 is the accelerated schedule in December.
16
17 The Council directed staff to also change the November 22 meeting to November 21,
18 2006.
19
20 Councilmember O'Donnell suggested the Council discuss on a future agenda ways to be
21 more efficient. Suggestions made included changing the meeting nights, having work
22 sessions prior to regular Council meetings and having staff items first on the work session
23 agendas
24
25 Council directed staff to place this item on a future Council work session for discussion.
26
27 COLUMBUS TOWNSHIP UPDATE
28
29 City Administrator Heitke provided the background on this issue noting it has been
30 discussed at past meetings. He stated Columbus Township was available for the meeting
31 toni • ht but the City of Forest Lake was not. He distributed state statute information
32 regarding this issue.
33
34 City Administrator Heitke stated staff is still very cautious about passing a resolution
35 relating to the incorporation of Columbus Township. He stated he did speak with the City
36 Attorney regarding this issue. The City Attorney advised if the City approves the
37 resolution, the City should be prepared to testify in court in regard to that action.
38
39 The Council directed staff to record the City Attorney's comments on paper for the
40 record. Council also directed staff to cancel the meeting with the City of Forest Lake and
41 Columbus Township.
42
6
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 4, 2006
DRAFT
•
1 2006 COUNCIL RETREAT
2
3 City Administrator Heitke advised information for the 2006 LMC Elected Officials
4 Conference was included in the Council packets. He asked that Councilmember's contact
5 Jean Viger to register for the LMC conference.
6
7 City Administrator Heitke stated the Council has committed to holding annual retreats for
8 the purpose of engaging in teambuilding, goal setting, etc. Staff needs direction for
9 scheduling the 2006 Council retreat. If Mr. Neu is to be retained as the facilitator, the
10 City has attempted to minimize travel costs by scheduling the retreat at times that Mr. Neu
11 is in Minnesota for other meetings. Suggested dates to accomplish that would be
12 February 15 -16 or February 20 -21.
13
14 The Council directed staff to try to schedule the Council retreat for February 20 -21,
15 during the day. February 21 would only be necessary if the agenda calls for an additional
16 day.
17
18 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
19
20 There were no changes to the regular agenda.
21
22 The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m
23
24 These mimites were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
25 January 23, 2006.
26
27
28
29
30 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
31
32 Transcribed by:
33 Kim Points
34 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
35
7