Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02/08/2006 P&Z Minutes
CITYOFLINOLAKES PLANNING&ZONINGBOARDMINUTES I.CALLTOORDERANDROLLCALL ChairRaffertycalledtheLinoLakesPlanningandZoningBoardmeetingtoorderat6:32 p.m.,February8,2006. II.APPROVALOFAGENDA Theagendawasapproved. III.APPROVALOFMINUTES: January11,2006 Mr.LadenrequestedacorrectiontoPage10,paragraphfive,changing“Mr.Raffertyand Mr.Hyden votingnay”to“Mr.RaffertyandMr.Laden votingnay.” Mr.LadenrequestedacorrectiontoPage11,fifthparagraphunderItemD.,changing “not lessthan50 percentwould bewithout sidewalks”to“notlessthan50percentwould require sidewalks.” Mr.TrallemadeaMOTIONtoapprovetheJanuary11,2006Minutesasamendedand wassupportedbyMr.Pogalz.Motiontoapprovecarried7 -0. IV.OPENMIKE ChairRaf fertydeclaredOpenMikeat6:35p.m. TherewasnoonepresentforOpenMike. DATE TIMESTARTED TIMEENDED MEMBERSPRESENT MEMBERSABSENT : STAFFPRESENT : February8,2006 6:32P.M.7:26P.M. Hyden,Laden,Nelson,Pogalz,Rafferty,Rootand Tralle. None. PaulBengtsonandJeffSmyser Planning&ZoningBoard December14,2005 Page 2 Mr.PogalzmadeaMOTIONtocloseOpenMikeat6:36p.m.,andwassupportedbyMr. Laden.Motioncarried7 -0. V.ACTIONITEMS A.FinalPlatforCavegnEstates Mr.Bengtsonpresentedthestaffreport. Staffrecommendedapprovalwithnoconditions. Mr.Root askediftheapplicantisrequiredtopayafeeforthestreetvacation.Mr. Bengtsonrepliedthatthereisanapplicationfeeandanescrowfeethatwaspaidalong withtheapplicant’spreliminaryplatapplication. Therewerenofurtherquestionsofstaf f. Mr.LadenmadeaMOTIONtorecommendapprovaloftheFinalPlatforCavegn Estates.MotionwassupportedbyMr.Hyden.Motiontorecommendapprovalofthe FinalPlatofCavegnEstatescarried6 -0. B.FinalPlatforMarshanMeadows Mr.Smyserpresented thestaffreport. Staffrecommendedapproval. Mr.Tralleaskedifparkfeeswereinplace.Mr.Smyserexplainedthatthenecessaryfees werecollectedwiththedeveloper’sagreement.Thecityhadreceivedtherequiredletters of creditandescrowdollars;parkdedicationfeeswerecollectedascash.Mr.Smysernoted thatstaffconfirmsthatthesefeesarecompletedbeforetheCityCouncilapprovesthe developer’sagreement. Mr.Tralleinquiredaboutapotentialtrailthatwasinitiallydiscussedalongthee dgeof thelake.MrSmyserrepliedthereisanexistingtraileasementalongthelakeonthe propertiestothesouth,howeverthepropertyimmediatelysouthdoesnothaveatrail easement.Sincepreviousdiscussions,thecity’strailplanwasrevisedtore moveatrail alongthelakeinthisarea.Becauseofthis,easementsonthesouthernpropertieswillbe vacated.Mr.Smyserstatedthat,instead,thetrailplannowcallsforafuturetrailalong LakeDrive. Mr.Smyserexplainedtotheboardthattrailsar enotshownonfinalplats;finalplatsare limitedtoshowonlypropertyboundaries,easements&wetlands. Mr.Trallewonderedwhythetrailwouldn’trunalongthelake,insteadofalongabusy road.Mr.SmyserrespondedthattheParkBoarddecidedthetr ailalongthelakewasnot thebestlocationforatrail.Inaddition,theproposedlotsarenotverydeep,andatrail alongtherearlotlinesmayhaveaffectedtheabilitytobuildonthelots.Mr.Smyser Planning&ZoningBoard December 14,2005 Page 3 notedthatthetransportationtrailproposedforLakeDrisplannedasacommuterbike route. Mr.Pogalzquestionedtheopportunityforfuturerezoneandpotentialdevelopmentofthe churchpropertytothesouth.Mr.Smyserstatedthatthepropertywaspreviouslysplit into multipleparcels,andaroadeasementcurrentlyexistsforfutureextensionoftheroad that willrunthroughMarshanMeadows.Mr.Smysernotedthatthechurchpro pertyis currentlyzonedR -1,andthatMUSAandutilitiesarecurrentlyavailable;thereforethesite willbeabletobedeveloped. Mr.Ladenaskedwhowillmaintainthesidewalk.Mr.Smyserrepliedthatthisdeveloper proposedthesidewalk,thereforethe homeownerwillbeexpectedtoshovelit. Maintenanceofthesidewalkwillbetheresponsibilityofthecity.Mr.Smyserexplained thatmaintenanceisusuallydependentonthefundingofadevelopment.Mr.Laden suggestedthatstaffconsideraddressingthi sissueforfuturedevelopments. Mr.Raffertyaskedwhatthewetlandvegetationisinthisarea.Mr.Smyserwasunsureof details,butnotedthatthewetlandisdelineated.Mr.Raffertyaskedifthereareany restrictionsinplacethatwouldpreventthepr opertyownerfromremovingcattailsorother vegetationfromthelakeshore.Mr.Smyserrepliedthatinordertoremovevegetationfrom belowtheOrdinaryHighWaterLevel(OHWL),theownerwouldneedpermissionfrom theDNR.Mr.Smyseraddedthatapermit mayormaynotberequired. Mr.LadenaskediftherestrictionsendattheOHWL.Mr.Smyserrepliedthatthecity requiresadrainageandutilityeasementthatextendstenfeetbeyondthewetland.The wetlandareamayextendpasttheOHWL. Therewerenofu rtherquestionsforstaff. TheBoardrecognizedthatMr.GregSchlink,BruggemanProperties,3564Rollingview Drive,wasinattendancetoansweranyquestions. TherewerenoquestionsforMr.Schlink.TheboardappreciatedMr.Schlink’s attendance. Mr.Pog alzmadeaMOTIONtorecommendapprovaloftheFinalPlatforMarshan Meadows.MotionwassupportedbyMr.Nelson.Motiontorecommendapprovalofthe FinalPlatforMarshanMeadowscarried6 -0. C.FinalPlatforMiller’sCrossroads3 rd Addition Mr.Smys erpresentedthestaffreport. Staffrecommendedapproval. Therewerenoquestionsforstaff. TheboardinvitedthedeveloperMr.GregSchlink,BruggemanProperties,3564 RollingviewDrive,forcomment. Planning&ZoningBoard December14,2005 Page 4 Mr.PogalzstatedthathenoticedaPulteHomessignatthedevelopment,andwondered if thestructureswouldremainconsistentthroughoutthedevelopment.Mr.Schlink respondedthatBruggemanHomeswillcontinuetobuildtheone -storyhomes,andthat PulteHomespurchasedBruggeman’splansforthetwo -storyhomesinordertobuild themconsistently. Mr.Pogalzaskedwhenthedevelopmentwasproposedtobecomplete.Mr.Schlink repliedthattheproposedplatisthelastphase,andshouldbecompletedbytheendofthe year. Mr.Ladeninquiredaboutthecommercialcorner.Mr.Schlinkrepliedtheyarehopingto presentaConditionalUsePermitapplicationforthecommercial areatotheboardatthe nextmeeting. Therewerenofurtherquestions. Mr.NelsonmadeaMOTIONtorecommendapprovaloftheFinalPlatforMiller’s Crossroads.MotionwassupportedbyMr.Laden.Motiontorecommendapprovalofthe FinalPlatforMiller’sCrossroadscarried6 –0. D.PUBLICHEARINGforAmendmenttoConditionalUsePermittoallowfor constructionofanadditionaloverheadcranebayatMolinConcrete,415Lilac Street ChairRaffertyopenedthePublicH earingat7:05p.m. Mr.Bengtsonpresentedthestaffreport. Staffrecommendedapprovalwiththreeconditionslistedinthestaffreport. Mr.Ladenaskedwhatthedottedlinesshownontheplanswere.Mr.Bengtsonreplied thatthedottedlinenotedaprevi ousThomasSt.linethatisnowvacated. Therewerenofurtherquestionsforstaff. TheboardinvitedMr.RandyMolin,MolinConcrete,415LilacSt,tocomment. Mr.Molinstatedtherewasnotmuchresponsefromtheneighborsforthisproject.Mr. Molinexp lainedthatthereasontheyareaddinganadditionalbayisbecausetheyadded anotherproductline,whichhasincreasedproductivity. TheBoardthankedMr.Molinforhisattendance. Mr.LadenmadeamotiontoclosethePublicHearingat7:10p.m..Motion was supportedbyMr.Tralle.Motionwasapproved6 -0. Planning&ZoningBoard December14,2005 Page 5 Mr.HydenmadeaMOTIONtorecommendapprovaloftheCUPAmendmentforMolin Concretesubjecttotheconditionslistedinthestaffreport.MotionwassupportedbyMr. Pogalz.MotiontorecommendapprovaloftheCUPAmendmentforMolinConcrete carried6 -0. E.CONTINUED:PUBLICHEARINGtoAmendthePlannedUnitDevelopment forLegacyatWoodsEdgetoincludesignagecriteria ChairRaffertyreopenedthePublicHearingat7:10p.m. Mr.Bengtsonpresentedthestaffreport,whichincludedadraftoftheSignageCriteriafor LegacyatWoodsEdge. Staffrecommendedapproval. Mr.Ladenaskediftherewasadifferencebetweenresidentialandcommercialsignage requirements.Mr.Bengtsonst atedthatlanguagecouldbeaddedtomakethedistinction moreclear.Mr.Ladenrespondedthathewasnotrequestingalanguagechange,butwas confirmingtherewasadifference. Mr.HydenaskediffreestandingsignsarelimitedtotheYMCAandCityHall.Mr. Bengtsonrepliedthatwascorrect,andthereasonwasbecausethesestructuresareset backfromtheRight -of -Way.Staffdoesnotwanttoencouragemonumentsignsthat mightinterferewithvisibilityoraccessibilityofasite. Mr.Raffertyaskedifth erewouldbeadditionalsignagerequirementsinthefuture.Mr. Bengtsonrepliedthatthiswouldbetheentiresignageordinanceforthisdevelopment. Mr.Ladenaskedifthereisapermitprocesstoallowfortemporarysigns.Mr.Bengtson repliedthatSect ion5.3describeswhichsignsrequirepermits.Mr.Bengtsonnotedthat bannersandhand -writtensignswillbeprohibitedthroughoutthedevelopment. Mr.Raffertyappreciatedstaff’seffortstoregulatethesizeofsigns.Mr.Raffertywondered whytherewas norequirementastothecenteringofabuildingsign.Mr.Bengtson explainedthatthereisamarginrequirementoneitheredgeofabuildingwallface,inorder topreventasigntobeplacedallthewaytoacorneroredgeofabuilding.Mr.Rafferty qu estionediftheproposedsix -inchmarginwouldbeenough.Mr.Bengtsonrespondedthat themarginrequirementscouldbeincreasedforsingletenantbuildings. Therewerenofurtherquestionsforstaff. Mr.HydenmadeamotiontoclosethePublicHearingat 7:22p.m.Motionwas supportedbyMr.Tralle.Motioncarried6 -0. Mr.NelsonmadeaMOTIONtorecommendapprovaltoAmendthePlannedUnit DevelopmentforLegacyatWoodsEdgetoincludesignagecriteria.Motionwas supportedbyMr.Pogalz. Planning&ZoningBoard December14,2005 Page6 Mr.Trallecommentedthatstaffdidagreatjobonthisissue. MotiontorecommendapprovaltoAmendthePlannedUnitDevelopmentforLegacyat WoodsEdgetoincludesignagecriteriacarried6 -0. VI.DISCUSSIONITEMS A.MeetingRules Mr.Hydenofferedtoputtogetherinformationonthisissueandforwardtheinformation to Mr.Smysertoincludeinafuturepacket. Theboardagreedtocontinuethisdiscussionatafuturemeeting. VII.ADJOURNMENT Mr.T rallemadeaMOTIONtoadjournthemeetingat7:26p.m.Motionwassupported byMr.Root.Motiontoadjourncarried6 -0. Respectfullysubmitted, DawnBugge CommunityDevelopmentAssistant