Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/05/2006 Council PacketHardwood Creek Design Summit April 5, 2006 Attendance Sheet Name � �7v 1:14c'S-0() Board /Committee or Address a,/ C'tJn ctAr L e-gbcor� c� b ED 11 C_ Girt/ CPL' vi C- (L... go--4-g/D C V\ k� e -,%fin !1'I c 1 hatter \I- 91(eu pi. Name Hardwood Creek Design Summit April 5, 2006 Attendance Sheet Board /Committee or Address ,1") 6 r '04 i rlv S v-'- 6 Pia n ,K1 f' In1 CJ c; 47 5-M-4- kinlo l �� �o �► ►pt-t_Z- �1 57 9 K/ Hardwood Creek Design Summit April 5, 2006 Attendance Sheet Name Board /Committee or Address Hardwood Creek Design Summit Joint Meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council Planning & Zoning Board Environmental Board Park Board Economic Development Advisory Committee Wednesday, April 5, 2006 AGENDA I. Call to Order (Mayor Bergeson) II. Introductions III. Project Presentation IV. Discussion V. Adjourn Hardwood Creek Design Summit Joint Meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council Planning & Zoning Board Environmental Board Park Board Economic Development Advisory Committee Wednesday, April 5, 2006 Introductions Design Team • City Staff • Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban (DSU) • TKDA • Hardwood Creek Development, LLC 1 Design Summit Objectives • Confirmation /Additions to Public Values • Comments on Development Framework /Design • Summary of Feedback • Next Steps Project Background • Master Plan Joint Meeting — April 2004 • City Council Goal to Master Plan 35E corridor - June 2004 • Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan Adopted — August 2004 • 35E Corridor AUAR Initiated — October2004 • AUAR with Mitigation Plan Adopted — October2005 • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approved — January 2006 T Ar woo Cree1c ntototo 2 Guiding Principles • Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan Fostering a high quality living environment within the context of ecological protection, responsible and stewardship, long -term sustainability, and economic viability — Perpetuating an interconnected latticework of natural landscapes, greenways, parks, and trails throughout the City — Fostering the "city as a park" concept, whereby preserved natural areas and parks serve as a primary factor in shaping the character of the community Guiding Principles • I -35E Corridor AUAR — Conservation Design Framework — Transportation System — Cultural Resources — Municipal Services 3 Guiding Principles • Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Mixed Use — Maximum Residential Density 4.5 units /acre — Maximum Residential Units 1,150 — 2/3 of residential area limited to low density (3.0 units /acre) — Conservation Development — Minimum of 70 acres Commercial Existing Conditions • Agricultural Use • 2 County Ditches • Heavily Tiled • Poor Stormwater Management • Transportation Issues • Limited & Degraded Ecological Resources • Gas Pipeline 4f r and &reed. ti 4 Identified Public Values • Improved Water Quality • Interconnected, Continuous Open Space System with Trail Network • Enhanced Ecological Systems on the Site • Improved Stormwater Management (flow rates, volume, and quality) • Increased Natural Open Space over Conventional Development • Increased City Tax Base • Preserved Elements of Agricultural History • Needed Transportation Improvements • Diverse Housing Opportunities • Localized Commercial Opportunities • Walkability 5