Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/24/2006 Council Packet
Monday July 24, 2006 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) City Council: Mayor Bergeson, Council Members Carlson, O'Donnell, Reinert & Stoltz City Administrator: Gordon Heitke RW Community Room (not televised) 5:40 — 6:30 p.m. — Mayor Bergeson, Council Members O'Donnell, Reinert, Carlson, and Stoltz present Meeting recessed for session to follow the regular Council Meeting 1) 2007 Budget Preparation Process 2) Community Visioning Project — Carl Neu I1 ➢ Open Mike / Public Comment None ➢ Call to Order and Roll Call 6:30 p.m. — Present were Mayor Bergeson, Council Members O'Donnell, Reinert, Carlson & Stoltz ➢ Pledge of Allegiance ➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items Agenda accepted as presented SET`'A A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) July 24, 2006 (Check No. 77156 through 77260) in the amount of $577,704.24; ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 15252 through 15277) in the amount of $79,725.92 B) Consider Resolution 06 -116, Sale of Hydro - pneumatic tank to the Town of Columbus Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by Carlson, to approve the Consent Agenda (Items 1A and 1B) was adopted by a unanimous voice vote Council Agenda -2- 7/25/2006 A) Public Hearing on the Issuance and Sale of $2,460,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds Series 2006C i) Consider Resolution No. 06 -117, Awarding the Sale of $2,460,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds Series 2006c Action Taken: Public hearing opened at 6:47 p.m.; motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Reinert, to close the public hearing was adopted by a unanimous voice vote Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by Stoltz, to approve Resolution No. 06 -117 was adopted by a unanimous voice vote B) Consider Resolution No. 06 -118, Awarding the Sale of $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds Series 2006D Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve Resolution No. 06 -118 was adopted by a unanimous voice vote A A) Permission for Use of City Property for Blue Heron Days Carnival Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by Stoltz, to authorize the use of city property as requested, contingent upon verification of proper insurance coverage, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote DEPARTMENT REPORT, A) None ARTMENT REPOR A) None c. A) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -120, Authorizing Comprehensive Planning Consultant Services Contract with DSU, Michael Grochala Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by Stoltz, to approve Resolution No. 06 -120, including the cost of the transportation allocation model, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote; Council Member Carlson voted nay B) Legacy Townhomes i. Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -112, Approving Development Agreement, Jim Studenski Pg 68 -84 Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by Stoltz, to approve Resolution No. 06 -112 was adopted by a unanimous voice vote Council Agenda -3- 7/25/2006 ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -119, Approving Final Plan/Final Plat, Paul Bengtson Pg 85 -105 Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Stoltz, to approve Resolution No. 06 -119 including the staff recommended conditions, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote C) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -121, Approving Joint Powers Agreement with Anoka County, CSAH 14 Reconstruction Project, Michael Grochala Pg 106 -116 Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by Reinert, to approve Resolution No. 06 -121 was adopted by a unanimous voice vote FINIS A) None. „✓ �..s, i.., ., r rria. .e.a,.r .,. : .. .... „r ,-, „ -.. .. „r _: ` ,„r _r _ ,,..Ghrirv.,.c, �;,5 �:4 ,,..._. . A) Consider approval of June 26, 2006 Council Work Session Minutes Mayor Bergeson & Council Member Stoltz absent Pg 117 -118 Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by Carlson, to approve the minutes of June 26, 2006 was adopted by a unanimous voice vote; Mayor Bergeson and Council Member Stoltz abstained B) Consider approval of July 10, 2006 Council Work Session Minutes Council Member Carlson absent Pg 119 -121 C) Consider approval of July 10, 2006 City Council Minutes Council Member Carlson absent Pg 122 -126 Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Stoltz, to approve the work session and city council meeting minutes of July 10, 2006 was adopted by a unanimous voice vote; Council Member Carlson abstained ourn n Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by Carson, to adjourn at 7:27 p.m. was adopted by a unanimous voice vote Community Calendar - A Look Ahead July 25, 2006 through August 14, 2006 4. Tuesday, August 1 4. Wednesday, August 2 4. Monday, August 7 Wednesday August 9 4 Wednesday August 9 5 -9 p.m. 6:30 p.m. 6:30 p.m. 6:30 p.m. 6:00 p.m. National Night Out Environmental Board Mtg. Park Board Planning and Zoning Board Council Financial Work Session • • WS Item # 1 Memorandum To: Mayor and Council Members From: Al Rolek Date: July 24, 2006 Re: Questions relating to 2007 Budget Proposal Gordon Heitkq informed me of questions the City Council has entering into the preparation of the 2007 budget. I understand that there are basically two questions: 1) What entities have requested contributions from the City for 2007? As of today, I have received the following requests: Anoka County Sesquicentennial Celebration $1,000 Anoka County Mediation Services 1,970 Forest Lake Youth Services Bureau (2006 request) 5,000 Alexandra House 5,993 Blue Heron Days No specific amount requested 35 W Coalition (2006 request) 6,101 Assn. of Metropolitan Municipalities (2006 request) 5,777 2) Tax Capacity information for pay 2007. The information I have received from Anoka County is very preliminary. Information relative to fiscal disparities and tax increment districts is not available until late August at the earliest; therefore, I have estimated these amounts. Given this preliminary data, our net tax capacity is estimated to have increased by 10.6% over pay 2006. If we maintain our current tax rate of 41.362% of tax capacity, it is estimated we could levy an additional $783,600 (this is total levy — general, debt service, tax abatements and special levies). 0 It should be remembered that this is a preliminary estimate and is but one funding source of the annual budget, albeit the largest. I hope that this information will aid the City Council in determining parameters for the 2007 budget and tax levy. I will be available on Monday night to discuss this information with you and answer you questions. • • • • WS - 2 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item No. 2 Date: Council Work Session, July 24, 2006 To: City Council From: Gordon Heitke Re: Visioning Project Background The City council approved the proposal of Carl Neu and Company for the facilitation and preparation of a new vision for Lino Lakes at the July 10, 2006 City Council meeting. Mr. Neu has requested a meeting with the Council to review the visioning process and schedule in order for the project to be initiated. Requested Council Direction Mr. Neu and staff are seeking Council concurrence with the proposed process, roles and schedule for the project in order for work to begin. Attachments 1. Community Visioning Process Working Paper, July 24, 2006 1 •■ • • IF 11 0 COMPANY COMMUNITY VISIONING PROCESS City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Working Paper July 24, 2006 1. A three- phased comprehensive community- based, city sponsored, leadership process for defining and shaping Lino Lakes Future: 2030 (See page 4). 2. Goals: Community Visioning and Comprehensive Plan Update: • citizen - based /advised: citizen committees representative of the community • community vision and comprehensive plan update representative of community's views and input • visioning and comprehensive plan dialogue, deliberations, and outcomes to be fact -based and realistic • visioning and comprehensive plan process and products to be of superb quality positioning Lino Lakes to be on the "leading edge" of innovative thinking and leadership — continuing the trend of Lino Lakes "being a leader ". 3. Key Commitments: • citizen involvement representative of the entire Lino Lakes community • citizen -driven process with city sponsorship • input from /involvement of key stakeholders • outreach - publicity- communications • comply with Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan mandate. 4. Key players and roles: • City Council • City Staff • Community Visioning Committee • Citizens /stakeholders • Consultants: o Decision Resources 1 • • • o Neu and Company o DSU o Planning Commission o Planning Advisory Committee 5. Publicity, communications, outreach: • Lino Lakes Visioning to 2030 • Launching the process (publicity, time lines, contacts) • Outreach to community, stakeholders, all community segments (forums, newsletter, press releases, web, posters, etc.) 6. Community Visioning Projected Timeline: a. August: Announce Community Visioning Project: (Mary Alice Divine — Coordinator) - Newsletter - Media releases - Web Invitations to Lino Lakes citizens selected to be invited to become the Citizens Visioning Committee. b. September: Selection and orientation of Citizen Visioning Committee Select and publish dates and locations for two community forums. Continue publicity and community outreach. c. October - November: Community Forums Citizen Vision Committee Vision and Strategic Planning Task Forces Drafting of Community Vision and Strategic Plan On -going Communications d. December: Presentation of draft Community Vision and Strategic Plan to City Council. 2 • • Preparation and receipt of final Community Vision and Strategic Plan by the City Council as segue into Comprehensive Plan Process 3 • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 0 M 0 N r C.) cJ O C. 0. .0 cA C.) etZ CI CLJ C E E O C.4 0. W Vi w December 2006 E 0 U Q cn 1) cn cn Inventory - Analysis Public Forums 4— 00 0 N 0 0 N c •■•0 0 o Q) 0 • • • THEME (Branding) A three- phased community -based leadership process for defining and shaping Lino Lake's future: ❑ Quality of Life Survey ❑ Community Visioning Project ❑ Comprehensive Plan Update 5 • • • Role of City Council (General Overview) 1. Sponsor entire (all 3 elements) leadership effort. 2. Encourage full community participation and support of the process. 3. Invite persons chosen by the random (scientific) representation - selection process to become part of the Community Visioning Committee. Note: 1. Council members are not members of the Community Visioning Committee and task forces and they are requested to not attend meetings or influence the deliberations of these groups in any manner. 2. Council requests for information about the Community Visioning Committee or task force activities are to be routed through the Committee Chair or the consultant/facilitator. 6 • • • Role of City Staff (General Overview) 1. Act as a valuable "expert" resource to the Community Visioning Process. 2. Provide base line and historical information as requested. 3. Provide Community Visioning Committee and Task Force Chairs with human and information resources required to support the work of their groups. 4. Staff persons are not to be members of the Community Visioning Committee or Task Forces (Subcommittees). 7 • • • Role of the Community Visioning Committee 1. Representative cross section of Lino Lakes community selected by a process similar to that used to identify respondents in the Quality of Life Survey. Decision Resources, Ltd. will assist in identifying people to be invited to become part of the Community Visioning Committee. Exclusions are members of the City Council, City Staff and City Planning Commission. 2. Assumes overall responsibility for coordination of the Community Visioning Process and preparation of the Community Vision and accompanying strategic plan. 3. Holds community forums for expanded public /stakeholder input. 4. Appoints and engages the Community Visioning Committee subcommittees drawn from the overall committee. 5. Keeps the council and community informed: • Publicity /communications • Identifies and makes use of all available /appropriate communications approaches: web, media, briefings to stakeholder groups • Special approaches — newsletters, utility bill inserts, articles in community group publications • Briefings to city council. 6. Oversee preparation of the final Visioning Report Project Coordinators to assist Community Visioning Committee: Mary Alice Divine, Public Information and Communications Julie Bartell, Meeting Coordination, notices, logistics, etc. 8 COMPANY ✓iced oQN /ter b L�tt lJ Gu r t It .(s s r 01A 11(?-q12-00G Revised copy: 7/23/2006 COMMUNITY VISIONING PROCESS City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Working Paper July 24, 2006 1. A three- phased comprehensive community- based, city sponsored, leadership process for defining and shaping Lino Lakes Future: 2030 (See page 4). 2. Goals: Community Visioning and Comprehensive Plan Update: • citizen - based /advised: citizen committees representative of the community • community vision and comprehensive plan update representative of community's views and input • visioning and comprehensive plan dialogue, deliberations, and outcomes to be fact -based and realistic • visioning and comprehensive plan process and products to be of superb quality positioning Lino Lakes to be on the "leading edge" of innovative thinking and leadership — continuing the trend of Lino Lakes "being a leader ". 3. Key Commitments: • citizen involvement representative of the entire Lino Lakes community • citizen -driven process with city sponsorship • input from/involvement of key stakeholders • outreach - publicity- communications • comply with Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan mandate. 4. Key players and roles: • City Council • City Staff 1 • Community Visioning Committee • Citizens /stakeholders • Consultants: o Decision Resources, Ltd. o Neu and Company o SDU • Planning Commission • Planning Advisory Committee 5. Publicity, communications, outreach: • Lino Lakes Visioning to 2030 • Launching the process (publicity, time lines, contacts) • Outreach to community, stakeholders, all community segments (forums, newsletter, press releases, web, posters, etc.) 6. Community Visioning Projected Timeline: a. August: Announce Community Visioning Project: (Mary Alice Divine — Coordinator) - Newsletter - Media releases - Web Invitations to Lino Lakes citizens selected to be invited to become members of the Citizen Visioning Committee. b. September: Selection and orientation of Citizen Visioning Committee Select and publish dates and locations for two community forums. Continue publicity and community outreach. c. October - November: Community Forums (May schedule for late September). Citizen Visioning Committee Vision and Strategic Planning Task Forces Drafting of Community Vision and Strategic Plan On -going communications 2 d. December: Presentation of draft Community Vision and Strategic Plan to City Council. Preparation and receipt of final Community Vision and Strategic Plan by the City Council to segue into the Comprehensive Plan Process 3 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota z Cv Q C2, 5 5 Cd CZ: 9r 1 Cl4 o 4-4 En 0 0 c s U CY December 2006 Inventory- Analysis Public Forums • oA 0 a § . o U U� o`er UQ THEME (Branding) A three- phased community -based leadership process for defining and shaping Lino Lake's future: ❑ Quality of Life Survey ❑ Community Visioning Project ❑ Comprehensive Plan Update 5 Role of City Council (General Overview) 1. Sponsor entire (all 3 elements) leadership effort. 2. Encourage full community participation and support of the process. 3. Invite persons chosen by the random (scientific) representation - selection process to become part of the Community Visioning Committee. Note: 1. Council members ate not members of the Community Visioning Committee and task forces and they are requested to not attend meetings or influence the deliberations of these groups in any manner. 2. Council requests for information about the Community Visioning Committee or task force activities are to be routed through the Committee Chair or the consultant/facilitator. 6 Role of City Staff (General Overview) 1. Act as a valuable "expert" resource to the Community Visioning Process. 2. Provide base line and historical information as requested. 3. Provide Community Visioning Committee and Task Force Chairs with human and information resources required to support the work of their groups. 4. Staff are not to be members of the Community Visioning Committee or Task Forces (Subcommittees). 7 Role of the Community Visioning Committee 1. Representative cross section of Lino Lakes community selected by a process similar to that used to identify respondents in the Quality of Life Survey. Decision Resources, Ltd. will assist in identifying people to be invited to become part of the Community Visioning Committee. Exclusions are members of the City Council, City Staff and City Planning Commission. 2. Assumes overall responsibility for coordination of the Community Visioning Process and preparation of the Community Vision and accompanying strategic plan. 3. Holds community forums for expanded public /stakeholder input. 4. Appoints and engages the Community Visioning Committee subcommittees drawn from the overall committee. 5. Keeps the council and community informed: • Publicity /communications • Identifies and makes use of all available /appropriate communications approaches: web, media, briefings to stakeholder groups • Special approaches — newsletters, utility bill inserts, articles in community group publications • Briefings to city council. 6. Oversee preparation of the final Visioning Report Project Coordinators to assist Community Visioning Committee: Mary Alice Divine, Public Information and Communications Julie Bartell, Meeting Coordination, notices, logistics, etc. 8 • EXPENDITURES JULY 24, 2006 • • Date: 07/06/2006 Time: 10:33:48 Ranges: Options: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (r) 5548 5548 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Detail / Summary: s Sort: N City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 1 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000304 KUSTERMAN, BILL 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000321 RICHARD S. CARLSON DEV., LLC 1 7,654.42 7,654.42 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,402.33 1,402.33 .00 .00 000698 KEY LAND HOMES 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 .00 .00 000879 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH PLAN 1 39,616.10 39,616.10 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 4,264.30 4,264.30 .00 .00 001550 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENEFITS 1 954.61 954.61 .00 .00 001875 HUELMAN, PAT 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 002355 LINDY, GEORGE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 002598 KURAK, SUSAN 1 65.00 65.00 .00 .00 002694 AMERICAN MESSAGING 1 35.77 35.77 .00 .00 •00 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO, INC. 1 458.84 458.84 .00 .00 003011 MONTAIN, PAUL 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 004367 TASCHUK, PAM 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 004420 HEITKE, GORDON 1 144.92 144.92 .00 .00 004538 FREDERICKSON, AARON 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 004788 SPRINT 1 159.96 159.96 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 17 57,806.25 57,806.25 .00 .00. • Date: 07/14/2006 Time: 09:30:07 Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 5569 - 5569 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL Page: 1 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost D00073 MCCARTHY, KELLY ANN 1 1,073.52 1,073.52 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 595.36 595.36 .00 .00 000128 BERGMAN COMPANIES, INC. 1 3,872.00 3,872.00 .00 .00 000148 TARGET 1 36,636.00 36,636.00 .00 .00 000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 94.50 94.50 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 1 45.91 45.91 .00 .00 000254 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1 499.49 499.49 .00 .00 000256 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 1 197.20 197.20 .00 .00 000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 142.50 142.50 .00 .00 000312 HUFFMAN, JAMES R. 1 333.50 333.50 .00 .00 000364 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 1 289.50 289.50 .00 .00 •08 AFSCME COUNCIL #5 1 839.57 839.57 .00 .00 000416 PEARSON, LISA 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 000429 ESBOLDT, KATHERINE 1 3.00 3.00 .00 .00 000431 FORD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 1 7,312.25 7,312.25 .00 .00 000433 METRO NORTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 275.00 275.00 .00 .00 000434 NEWVILLE, MELANIE 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00 000436 RYBAK COMPANIES /SNO BARONS 1 323.45 323.45 .00 .00 000437 SERVOCAL INSTRUMENTS, INC. 1 550.00 550.00 .00 .00 000438 W H RESPONSE 1 22,971.28 22,971.28 .00 .00 000441 W. 5. DARLEY & COMPANY 2 221.27 221.27 .00 .00 000442 ZOLA, JOETTE 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 • Date: 07/14/2006 Time: 09:30:08 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 v Discount `dor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000443 SANDMON, MARK & ANDREA 1 3,500.00 3,500.00 .00 .00 000505 REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC. 1 2,632.40 2,632.40 .00 .00 000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 3 1,199.48 1,199.48 .00 .00 000543 TSM DEVELOPMENT 3 10,500.00 10,500.00 .00 .00 000685 BILL'S GUN SHOP /RANGE -BJAM, INC. 1 23.00 23.00 .00 .00 000700 STOLTZ, DANIEL 1 67.85 67.85 .00 .00 000769 EXCELSIOR, CITY OF 1 59.00 59.00 .00 .00 000900 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 1 231.27 231.27 .00 .00 000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 14,115.20 14,115.20 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 2 120.84 120.84 .00 .00 001008 COLUMBUS, TOWN OF 1 17,351.18 17,351.18 .00 .00 001014 T/C BUILDERS, INC. 1 3,500.00 3,500.00 .00 .00 001044 CHOICEPOINT SERVICES, INC. 1 232.00 232.00 .00 .00 001083 KOHL'S 1 22,847.00 22,847.00 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 3,672.91 3,672.91 .00 .00 001260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 1 154.50 154.50 .00 .00 •67 FAST BREAK CORNER MARKET, INC. 1 23.95 23.95 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 278.23 278.23 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 2 8,432.54 8,432.54 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 93.40 93.40 .00 .00 001583 JASPER ENGINE /TRANSMISSION EXCHANGE, INC 1 2,436.00 2,436.00 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 117.92 117.92 .00 .00 001618 GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC. 1 148,727.82 148,727.82 .00 .00 001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 49.98 49.98 .00 .00 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 90.00 90.00 .00 .00 001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 1 13,496.41 13,496.41 .00 .00 001977 I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC. 1 71.36 71.36 .00 .00 • Date: 07/14/2006 Time: 09:30:06 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount *or # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002030 J- CRAFT, INC. 1 61,375.95 61,375.95 .00 .00 002178 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 522.79 522.79 .00 .00 002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 777.00 777.00 .00 .00 002248 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR & CO., LLP 1 8,250.00 8,250.00 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 66.37 66.37 .00 .00 002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 47,831.70 47,831.70 .00 .00 002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 761.63 761.63 .00 .00 002666 RICHARDS, BRIAN 1 275.00 275.00 .00 .00 002743 BCA /CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFO SYSTEMS 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 002760 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 5,129.00 5,129.00 .00 .00 002836 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 1 4,547.25 4,547.25 .00 .00 002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 246.42 246.42 .00 .00 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 1,099.05 1,099.05 .00 .00 003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC. 1 153.53 153.53 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 1,505.71 1,505.71 .00 .00 003293 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY, INC. 1 3,150.00 3,150.00 .00 .00 •00 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LANDSCAPING 1 891.40 891.40 .00 .00 003443 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER, INC. 1 156.92 156.92 .00 .00 003491 PETTY CASH 1 68.86 68.86 .00 .00 003520 DENNIS L. CONROY, PH.D. 1 625.00 625.00 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 7 911.64 911.64 .00 .00 003763 DECISION RESOURCES, LTC. 1 10,500.00 10,500.00 .00 .00 003862 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 55.95 55.95 .00 .00 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 216.93 216.93 .00 .00 003990 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF 1 2,471.44 2,471.44 .00 .00 004125 ST. PAUL CITY OF 1 600.00 600.00 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 4,487.61 4,487.61 .00 .00 • 8 Date: 07/14/2006 Time: 09:30:08 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount V ndor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 0 4370 TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC 1 250.00 250.00 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 199.26 199.26 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 2 345.00 345.00 .00 .00 004468 IMAGETECH SERVICES, INC. 1 199.66 199.66 .00 .00 004560 U S BANK 1 6,362.76 6,362.76 .00 .00 004604 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1 390.00 390.00 .00 .00 007130 PEREZ, LISA 1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00 900330 BERBEE INFORMATION NETWORKS CORPORATION 1 6,111.66 6,111.66 .00 .00 900415 CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRUCTION 1 18,800.00 18,800.00 .00 .00 900578 BUDGET BLINDS, INC. 1 127.96 127.96 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 101 519,897.99 519,897.99 .00 .00* • • Date: 07/14/2006 Time: 09:34:14 Operator: JAL . Ranges: Options: Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: Dept Id: Program: Vendor #: Invoice #: Schedule Journal #: Bank #: Cash #: Payroll Check Dates: (A) (A) (A) (A) (A) (R) 5549 - 5574 (A) (A) (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 77159 0 77163 77164 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .168 0 170 77171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description AFSCME COUNCIL #5 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF ESBOLDT, KATHERINE KEY LAND HOMES KURAK, SUSAN LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT MINNESOTA STATE TREASU MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYME MN. DEPT OF HEALTH NEWVILLE, MELANIE OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE PEARSON, LISA PEREZ, LISA PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN RICHARD S. CARLSON DEV RYBAK COMPANIES /SNO BA SANDMON, MARK & ANDREA SHOREVIEW, CITY OF T/C BUILDERS, INC. TSM DEVELOPMENT U 5 BANK ZOLA, JOETTE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING M DENTAL INSURANCE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMS BLDG ESCROW /6557 S REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC PAYROLL WITHHOLDING JUNE SAC SURCHARGE /2ND QUARTER PAY WITH /TERRY MECKLE -00 QUARTERLY WATER CONNECTI REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC ANIMAL CONTROL REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC HEALTH INSURANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LIFE INSURANCE REIMBURSE PARTIAL ESCROW * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER REIMB BLDG ESCROW /358 WA * * * * * * ** QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN * * * * * * ** REIMS BLDG ESCROW /1581 G * * * * * * ** REIMS BLDG ESCROW /7891 N * * * * * * ** COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC Total for Dept ** * * * * * * ** 0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT PROGRAM Total for Dept 200 0 PETTY CASH 0 RICHARDS, BRIAN POSTAGE SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL ENTERTAINER SPECIAL Total for Dept 205 0 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 0 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEM PROGRAM REC YOUTH IN YOUTH IN - 10 - Amount 839.57 2,488.36 3.00 2,500.00 65.00 777.00 3,069.00 4,547.25 246.42 5,129.00 10.00 96.00 20.00 15.00 8,669.00 17.88 1,040.62 7,654.42 323.45 3,500.00 9.10 3,500.00 10,500.00 4,038.34 45.00 59,103.41* 165.00 165.00* 5.00 275.00 280.00* 12.20 3,150.00 Date: 07/14/2006 Time: 09:34:14 Operator: JAL Ck # Vendor Alpha Name Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 207 O PETTY CASH POSTAGE YOUTH SP 0 U 5 BANK COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T YOUTH SP Total for Dept 208 O DECISION RESOURCES, LT SURVEY RESEARCH MAYOR /CO 0 STOLTZ, DANIEL REIMBURSE MILEAGE /PARKIN MAYOR /CO O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JUNE 26 MAYOR /CO 0 U S BANK COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T MAYOR /CO Total for Dept 401 0 77157 0 0 77159 0 77161 0 77168 0 77170 77172 0 ACCLAIM BENEFITS ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENE BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, CHOICEPOINT SERVICES, DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M EXCELSIOR, CITY OF HEITKE, GORDON KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SPRINT U S BANK FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI ADMINIST LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ADMINIST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINIST DRUG TESTING ADMINIST DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINIST MEETING /JEAN & JULIE ADMINIST LODGING /PARKING ADMINIST SEMINAR ADMINIST HEALTH INSURANCE ADMINIST NOTE OF RESCHEDULE ADMINIST LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE ADMINIST COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T ADMINIST Total for Dept 402 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SENIORS 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SENIORS Total for Dept 406 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FINANCE 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FINANCE 0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FINANCE 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE FINANCE 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN CHANGES IN ASSETS FINANCE 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FINANCE Total for Dept 407 0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY LEGAL CO Total for Dept 414 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ECONOMIC 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ECONOMIC 0 KOHL'S 1ST HALF TAX ABATEMENT P ECONOMIC 0 METRO NORTH CHAMBER OF MEMBERSHIP DUES /MARY D ECONOMIC 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE ECONOMIC 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ECONOMIC 0 TARGET 1ST HALF TAX ABATEMENT P ECONOMIC Total for Dept 415 • 3,162.20* 37.88 240.00 277.88* 10,500.00 67.85 345.00 368.80 11,281.65* 154.50 77.66 94.50 232.00 153.26 59.00 144.92 90.00 2,266.74 14.30 23.75 159.96 86.33 3,556.92* 4.96 4.75 9.71* 51.94 107.30 3,465.00 770.09 679.46 14.97 5,288.76* 13,781.00 13,781.00* 15.39 30.65 22,847.00 275.00 352.18 4.75 36,636.00 60,160.97* Date: 07/14/2006 Time 09:34:14 Operator: JAL Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 U S BANK COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T Total for Dept 416 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE GENE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 U 5 BANK COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T Total for Dept 418 0 77157 0 0 0 0 77159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77168 •170 0 0 0 0 ASPEN MILLS, INC. ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENE BCA /CRIMINAL JUSTICE I BILL'S GUN SHOP /RANGE- C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENNIS L. CONROY, PH.D FAST BREAK CORNER MARK Z.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, MCCARTHY, KELLY ANN METRO SALES INCORPORAT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT 0 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SAM'S CLUB, INC. SHRED -IT, INC. ST. PAUL CITY OF U 5 BANK UNIFORM SUPPLIES LONG TERM DISABILITY CLASS /MATT V RANGE TIME OFFICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE DENTAL INSURANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CAR WASHES UNIFORM SUPPLIES REIMBURSE TUITION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT CONNECT CHARGES /APRIL, ANIMAL CONTROL HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE ICE CREAM SOCIAL SUPPLIE DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT COURSE /KYLE L & CHRIS B COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T Total for Dept 420 PLANNING 28.51 PLANNING 61.30 PLANNING 704.36 PLANNING 9.50 PLANNING 50.00 853.67* COMM DEV 39.41 COMM DEV 76.62 COMM DEV 660.28 COMM DEV 11.87 COMM DEV -50.00 738.18* POLICE 1,199.48 INS POLICE 344.85 POLICE 45.00 POLICE 23.00 POLICE 19.70 POLICE 21.31 POLICE 444.70 POLICE 625.00 POLICE 23.95 POLICE 71.36 POLICE 1,073.52 POLICE 761.63 M POLICE 390.00 POLICE 60.92 POLICE 13,553.30 POLICE 137.75 POLICE 188.28 POLICE 55.95 POLICE 600.00 POLICE 255.50 19,895.20* 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FIRE 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FIRE 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE FIRE 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FIRE Total for Dept 421 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS BUILDING 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 422 41.55 89.83 1,802.06 14.25 1,947.69* 53.15 137.95 BUILDING 2,266.74 BUILDING 19.00 2,476.84* 77156 AMERICAN MESSAGING MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE STREETS 11.92 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS STREETS 86.90 • Date: 07/14/2006 Time: 09:34:14 Operator: JAL Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 0 77159 0 77168 77170 0 0 77157 0 77159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77168 77170 0 0 77157 0 0 77158 0 0 0 77159 0 0 0 0 77168 77170 0 0 0 0 Description Dept Amount BERGMAN COMPANIES, INC COLUMBUS, TOWN OF CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M HUFFMAN, JAMES R. PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS W. S. DARLEY & COMPANY PAVEMENT MARKING CLASS V GRAVEL /PINE STRE MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE DENTAL INSURANCE BEAVER REMOVAL HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE ASPHALT BALL SHUTOFF /PISTOL Total for Dept 430 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE GENE DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS GRIP STREETS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RED DIESEL DENTAL INSURANCE BEARING /FUEL PUMP /STRAIN FILTER /SHAFT ASSEMBLY CHEMICALS FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA BLADE /BLOWER KIT /THROTTL FLEET J- CRAFT, INC. BODY /HOIST /PLOW FLEET JASPER ENGINE /TRANSMIS REBUILD TRANSMISSION /POL FLEET O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, I TAPE /STARTER /FILTERS /BRA FLEET PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE FLEET RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FLEET THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH SENDER KIT FLEET Total for Dept 431 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. ASSURANT EMPOLYEE GENE SEABEE INFORMATION NET BUDGET BLINDS, INC. C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO CONNEXUS ENERGY DALCO, INC. DEEP ROCK WATER COMPAN DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M IMAGETECH SERVICES, IN NORTHERN AIR CORPORATI O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, I PETTY CASH PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN WASTE REMOVAL /JULY GOVERNME LONG TERM DISABILITY INS GOVERNME VOICE OVER I P SYSTEM GOVERNME VERTICAL BIND GOVERNME OFFICE SUPPLIES GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE GOVERNME BRUSH /BELT /LID CENTER GOVERNME MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE GOVERNME DENTAL INSURANCE GOVERNME BLUE LINE PAPER /AMMONIA GOVERNME REPAIR COOLING SYSTEM /CO GOVERNN TAPE /STARTER /FILTERS /BRA GOVERNME POSTAGE GOVERNME HEALTH INSURANCE GOVERNME LIFE INSURANCE GOVERNME SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNA SERVER LICENSE GOVERNME TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC INSTALL /MODIFY PERMITWOR GOVERNME U 5 BANK COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T GOVERNME XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE GOVERNME Total for Dept 432 0 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. WASTE REMOVAL /JULY PARKS 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENE LONG TERM DISABILITY IN5 PARKS • 3,872.00 17,351.18 852.50 179.31 333.50 2,654.25 37.29 4,487.61 221.27 30,087.73* 13.96 6,432.54 35.25 153.53 93.40 117.92 13,496.41 61,375.95 2,436.00 228.13 646.83 5.46 199.26 87,234.64* 383.29 9.61 6,111.66 127.96 101.14 127.99 1,222.21 278.23 197.20 30.65 199.66 289.50 3.14 6.37 352.18 4.75 499.49 250.00 1,099.13 1,199.83 12,495.99* 212.07 75.19 Date: 07/14/2006 Time: 09:34:14 Operator: JAL Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills # Vendor Alpha Name Description 77158 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 0 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 0 NATURE CALLS, INC. 0 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LA 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 450 MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE DENTAL INSURANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTAL HEADS /10 HEALTH INSURANCE 77157 77159 77168 77170 0 77160 77162 77165 77166 77167 77173 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE GENE DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SAM'S CLUB, INC. FREDERICKSON, AARON HUELMAN, PAT KUSTERMAN, BILL LINDY, GEORGE MONTAIN, PAUL TASCHUK, PAM LONG TERM DISABILITY INS DENTAL INSURANCE HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE ICE CREAM SOCIAL SUPPLIE Total for Dept 451 QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND Total for Dept 452 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE fib 0 U S BANK COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T Total for Dept 461 Dept PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS Amount RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SOLID WA 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SOLID WA 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE SOLID WA 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SOLID WA Total for Dept 462 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE GENE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE 7717D RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 463 0 77156 77157 77158 0 77159 • AMERICAN FASTENER & SU AMERICAN MESSAGING ASSURANT EMPOLYEE BENE CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M CAPS /HEX NUTS MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE LONG TERM DISABILITY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE DENTAL INSURANCE FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY WATER WATER INS WATER WATER WATER WATER 33.61 8.97 137.94 49.98 1,099.05 891.40 891.00 28.50 3,427.71* 38.89 98.08 1,131.26 15.20 28.65 1,312.08* 100.00 100.00 50.00 150.00 50.00 100.00 550.00* 10.85 10.72 196.02 4.04 150.00 371.63* 4.69 9.20 201.96 1.43 217.28* 5.47 10.73 196.02 1.66 213.88* 45.91 17.88 25.82 297.24 1,285.54 96.55 Date: 07/14/2006 Time: 09:34:14 Operator: JAL IPk # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept p Amount Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH WATER METER FORMS WATER 66.37 0 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, WATER SAMPLES WATER 142.50 0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT WATER 1,072.50 0 PETTY CASH POSTAGE WATER 2.71 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE WATER 1,327.01 0 REHBEIN EXCAVATING, IN REPLACE HYDRANT GATE VAL WATER 2,632.40 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE WATER 11.42 0 SERVOCAL INSTRUMENTS, SET UP FLOW TESTING EQUI WATER 550.00 0 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN WATER 1,695.00 0 U 5 BANK COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T WATER 62.33 0 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE WATER 43.63 Total for Dept 494 9,374.81* 77156 AMERICAN MESSAGING MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE SEWER 5.97 77157 ASSURANT EMPOLYEE GENE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SEWER 25.81 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE SEWER 282.38 77159 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SEWER 65.90 0 FORD CONSTRUCTION CO., GUIDE RAIL /NUTS /BOLTS SEWER 7,312.25 0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT SEWER 1,072.50 0 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT JUNE SAC SEWER 44,762.70 0 PETTY CASH POSTAGE SEWER 2.70 77168 PREFERRED ONE COMMUNIT HEALTH INSURANCE SEWER 974.82 77170 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SEWER 11.37 O SHOREVIEW, CITY OF QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN SEWER 767.34 O U S BANK COMPUTER PURCHASE /DAN T SEWER 62.33 O XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE SEWER 262.25 Total for Dept 495 55,608.32* •0 CRAIG SEVERSON CONSTRU CONCRETE WORK /BERMS & HI OTHER 18,800.00 O GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATI CONTRACTOR /LEGACY OTHER 148,727.82 0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OTHER 2,475.00 0 W H RESPONSE CONTRACTOR /LEGACY OTHER 22,971.28 0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY OTHER 334.20 0 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SER ACQUISITION /RELOCATION S OTHER 522.79 Total for Dept 499 193,831.09* Grand Total 577,704.24* • • • • Centennial Fire District Check Register 7/1912006 The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval: DATE CHECK# NAME 7/19/2006 15252 7/19/2006 15253 7/19/2006 15254 7/19/2006 15255 7/19/2006 15256 7/19/2006 15257 7/19/2006 15258 7/19/2006 15259 7/19/2006 15260 7/19/2006 15261 7/19/2006 15262 7/19/2006 15263 7/19/2006 15264 7/19/2006 15265 7/19/2006 15266 7/19/2006 15267 7/19/2006 15268 7/19/2006 15269 7/19/2006 15270 7/19/2006 15271 7/19/2006 15272 7/19/2006 15273 7/19/2006 15274 7/19/2006 15275 7/19/2006 15276 7/19/2006 15277 Ancom Communications, Inc. Anoka County Central Communications Armor Security, Inc Aspen Mills Batteries Plus Centennial Fire Relief Association City of Lino Lakes Comcast Connexus Energy David Bruder Diversified Texturing & Engraving Frattalone's Hardware International Assn. Of Arson Investigators J. H. Larson Company Janet Haapoja Keith Demarest Loffler Business Systems McLeod USA Metro Fire Milo Bennett Nextel Qwest Xcel Energy C -N -S Helmet Division Pro - Rider, Inc. Office Depot Susan Booth Total 1 of 1 - 1 6 - ACCOUNT 42130 - Equipment Expense 42205 - MHz User Fees 42110 - Other Maintenance 42120 - Uniform Expense 42130 - Equipment Expense 43010 - Relief Assocation 41000 - Payroll Expenses 42180 - Office Supplies Expense 42252 - Station 1 - Electric 42180 - Office Supplies Expense 42130 - Equipment Expense 42110 - Other Maintenance 42200 - Dues and Memberships 42110 - Other Maintenance 42180 - Office Supplies Expense 42130 - Equipment Expense 42180 - Office Supplies Expense 42240 - Telephone 42130 - Equipment Expense 42180 - Office Supplies Expense 42240 - Telephone 42240 - Telephone 42254 - Station 2 - Electric 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense 45010 - Safety Camp Expense AMOUNT 1644.45 671.58 740.17 79.95 269.54 7,060.00 64, 866.26 95.00 406.74 355.43 21.00 113.24 75.00 48.34 53.24 85.00 30.87 356.11 127.58 371.88 143.56 107.14 669.73 784.80 153.31 396.00 79,725.92 • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 1B Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director July 24, 2006 Consider Resolution No. 06 -116, Sale of Hydro - pneumatic tank to the Town of Columbus VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote Required) BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes abandoned a 7,500 gallon hydro - pneumatic tank when the Clearwater Creek booster station was constructed in 2003. This tank has since been stored at the Public Works storage area and city staff has attempted to sell the tank on several occasions. The Town of Columbus has recently expressed an interest in purchasing the tank. City staff estimates the salvage value of the hydro - pneumatic tank at $7,500. The Town of Columbus is interested in purchasing the tank for this amount. The Town of Columbus will be responsible for all transportation arrangements and is purchasing the tank in "as is" condition. Staff recommends that we enter into an agreement with the Town of Columbus allowing the Town of Columbus to acquire the 7,500 gallon hydro - pneumatic tank for a cost of $7,500. The city attorney has reviewed this resolution and has no problem with this arrangement. A letter from the Town of Columbus is attached. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 06 -116. 2. Deny approval of Resolution 06 -116. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 06 -116 Letter from the Town of Columbus • • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA RESOLUTION NO. 06 -116 SALE OF HYDRO - PNEUMATIC TANK TO THE TOWN OF COLUMBUS WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes abandoned a 7,500 gallon hydro - pneumatic tank when the Clearwater Creek booster station was constructed in 2003; and WHEREAS, The tank has since been stored at the Public Works storage area; and WHEREAS, City staff estimates the salvage value of the hydro- pneumatic tank at $7,500; and WHEREAS, The Town of Columbus is interested in purchasing the tank for this amount; and; WHEREAS, The Town of Columbus will be responsible for all transportation arrangements and is purchasing the tank in "as is" condition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: That the City Council hereby approves an agreement with the Town of Columbus allowing the Town of Columbus to acquire the 7,500 gallon hydro - pneumatic tank for a cost of $7,500. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 24th day of July, 2006. John Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: • The following voted against same: • • Town of Colu •us �1nce 1857 16319 Kettle River Blvd. • Forest Lake, MN 55025 Phone (651) 464 -3120 Fax (651) 464 -5922 July 17, 2006 Honorable Mayor and City Council Lino Lakes, Minnesota Re: Purchase of Used Pressure Tank Dear Mayor and Council Members: We understand that the City of Lino Lakes has a used 7,500 gallon hydro - pneumatic pressure tank that was a part of your water system, but is not longer in use. We understand that it has been removed from the pumphouse and awaiting disposal. The Town of Columbus is about to begin construction of its first well pumphouse, and we would very much like to purchase this used tank. We have inspected the tank and feel it will meet our needs. We will purchase the tank "as is" and handle all transportation arrangements. According to your Utility Supervisor Tim Hillesheim, the salvage value as scrap steel is $7,500.00. We would like to use the tank for its intended purpose as part of a water system rather than see it cut up for scrap. In that regard, the Town of Columbus would like to purchase the tank for $7,500.00. Action Requested Consider Columbus' offer to purchase the used pressure tank in "as is" condition for $7,500.00. Sincerely, Elizabeth Mursko Town Manager • AGENDA ITEMS 2A & 2B STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE July 24, 2006 TOPIC Public Hearing on Issuance and Sale of General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Consideration of Resolution 06 -117 Awarding the Sale of $2,640,000 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C and Resolution 06 -118 Awarding the Sale of $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority On May 22 the City Council approved resolutions 06 -85 and 06 -86 calling for the issuance of $2,470,000 G.O. Tax Abatement Bonds to finance its obligation to the YMCA project, and $570,000 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds to finance utility projects in the city. The City Council had • previously authorized the issuance of conduit bonds on behalf of the YMCA to finance that entity's portion of the facility construction costs. Due to a delay in the closing on the conduit bonds, the City Council adopted Resolution 06 -96 and 06 -97 amending the schedule for the issuance and sale of the G.O. Tax Abatement Bonds and the G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds and authorized the Finance Director to determine the date for a public hearing (as the Tax Abatement bonds are being issued as 501 (c) (3) bonds, a public hearing must be held in conjunction with their sale), publish notice of the hearing, and set the sale date of the Tax Abatement bonds to a date which follows the closing on the conduit bonds. The date for the hearing and the sale of these bond issues was set for July 24 based upon successful dosing on the conduit financing on June 28. The Series 2006C bond issue will be used to finance the city's $2,350,000 commitment toward the construction of the YMCA facility. The Series 2006D will be used to finance public improvement projects for County Road 49 Watermain Improvements (in conjunction with the Anoka County bridge replacement project) and Lois Lane Street and Utility Improvements. The City's financial advisor, Springsted, Inc., received bids for these issues earlier today. Terri Heaton, our representative from Springsted, will be in attendance to outline the outcome of the bids received and their recommendations for award of the sale. • Following the public hearing and pending the outcome of the competitive bid process, it is staff's recommendation that the City Council adopt, in separate actions, Resolution 06 -117 Awarding the Sale of $2,460,000 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C and Resolution 06- 118 Awarding the Sale of $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D. The amount of the Series 2006C is reduced in anticipation of reduced capitalized interest costs due to the delayed sale of the issue. • • • 1. Adopt Resolutions 06 -117 and 06 -118. 2. Refer to Staff for further review. 3. Deny Resolutions 06 -117 and 06 -118. Option 1 • • • Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in said City on Monday, July 24, 2006, commencing at 6:30 P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: * * * The Mayor announced that the next order of business was consideration of the proposals which had been received for the purchase of the City's approximately 52,460,000 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C. The City Administrator presented a tabulation of the proposals which had been received in the manner specified in the Terms of Proposal for the Bond. The proposals were as set forth in Exhibit A attached. After due consideration of the proposals, Member then introduced the following written resolution, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption: • • • RESOLUTION NO. 06 -117 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF APPROXIMATELY $2,460,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX ABATEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2006C; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows: Section 1. Sale of Bond. 1.01. The proposal of (the "Purchaser ") to purchase $ General Obligation Tax Abatement Bond, Series 2006C (the "Bonds ") of the City described in the Terms of Proposal thereof is determined to be a reasonable offer and is accepted, the proposal being to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , plus accrued interest to date of delivery for Bonds bearing interest as follows: Year of Interest Year of Interest Maturity Rate Maturity Rate 2011 2018 2012 2019 2013 2020 2014 2021 2015 2022 2016 2023 2017 True interest cost: 1.02. The sum of $ being the amount proposed by the Purchaser in excess of $ shall be credited to the Debt Service Fund hereinafter created. The City Finance Director is directed to retain the good faith check of the Purchaser, pending completion of the sale of the Bonds, and to return the good faith checks of the unsuccessful proposers forthwith. The Mayor and City Administrator are directed to execute a contract with the Purchaser on behalf of the City. 1.03. The City will forthwith issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to the Acts in the total principal amount of $ , originally dated as of July 15, 2006, in the denomination of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, numbered No. R -1, bearing interest semiannually, as above set forth, and maturing serially on February 1 the years and amounts as follows: • • Year Amount Year Amount 2011 2018 2012 2019 2013 2020 2014 2021 2015 2022 2016 2023 2017 For the purposes of compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.54, subdivision 1, the City hereby combines the maturities of the Bonds with the maturities of the City's $5,550,000 Taxable General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2005A, dated November 1, 2005. 1.04. Optional Redemption. The City may elect on February 1, 2017 and on any day thereafter to prepay the Bonds due on February 1, 2018. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC (as defined in Section 8 hereof) of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. 1.05. Extraordinary Redemption. The Bonds are subject to extraordinary redemption on any day in whole, but not in part, at a redemption price equal to par, plus accrued interest to the redemption date, upon conveyance, lease or transfer in other mode of the Project (as defined in Section 4.01 hereof) to an entity that is not a qualified 501(c)(3) entity under the Internal Revenue Code of 1987, as amended, or a unit of state or local government, in connection with foreclosure of the Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Agreement and Assignment of Leases and Rents, dated as of June 1, 2006 (the "Mortgage ") from YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, its successors and assigns (the "YMCA ") for the benefit of Patriot Bank Minnesota (the "Lender "). 1.06. Term Bonds. To be completed if Term Bonds are requested by the Purchaser. Section 2. Registration and Payment. 2.01. Registered Form. The Bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bonds has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the Bonds will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment 3 -24- • • • date, in which case the Bonds will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2007, to the registered owners of record as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not that day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City will appoint, and will maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar provides for the registration of ownership of the Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of the Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bond. Upon surrender for transfer of a Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. When Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When a Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the Bond until the Registrar is satisfied that the endorsement on the Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name a Bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether the Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of, the principal of and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes, and payments so made to a registered owner or upon the owner's order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. • • • (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. The Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of Bonds sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. If a Bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar will deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the City and the Registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar will be cancelled by the Registrar and evidence of such cancellation must be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Redemption. In the event the Bonds are called for redemption, notice thereof identifying the Bond to be redeemed will be given by the Registrar by mailing a copy of the redemption notice by first class mail (postage prepaid) to the registered owner of the Bond to be redeemed at the address shown on the registration books kept by the Registrar and by publishing the notice if required by law. Failure to give notice by publication or by mail to any registered owner, or any defect therein, will not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of the Bond. The Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided that the funds for the redemption are on deposit with the place of payment at that time. 2.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City appoints , Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar upon 30 days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar must deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Finance Director must transmit to the Registrar monies sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds will be prepared under the direction of the City Administrator and executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or 5 - 2 7 - • • • lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of the Bonds, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, the Bonds will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the Bonds has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a Bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Administrator will deliver the same to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. Section 3. Form of Bond. 3.01. The Bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the following form: No. R -_ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX ABATEMENT BOND, SERIES 2006C Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue February 1, 20 July 15, 2006 Registered Owner: Cede & Co. CUSIP The City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Anoka County, Minnesota (the "City "), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $ on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2007, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by , Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Paying Agent, Transfer Agent and Authenticating • • • Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The City may elect on February 1, 2017, and on any day thereafter to prepay the Bonds due on February 1, 2018. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such manner as the City will determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify Depository Trust Company ( "DTC ") of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. Prepayments will be at a price of par plus accrued interest. The Bonds are subject to extraordinary redemption on any day in whole, but not in part, at a redemption price equal to par, plus accrued interest to the redemption date, upon conveyance, lease or transfer in other mode of the Project financed by the Bonds to an entity that is not a qualified 501(c)(3) entity under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or a unit of state or local government, in connection with foreclosure of the Mortgage given by the YMCA to the Lender, all as such capitalized terms are defined in the Resolution (defined hereafter). This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $ all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, redemption privilege, and interest rate, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2006 (the "Resolution "), for the purpose of providing funds to finance the construction and operation of the Project described in the Resolution, pursuant to and in full conformity with the home rule charter and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and Sections 469.1812 to 469.1815. The principal hereof and interest hereon are payable from abatements collected from certain property in the City and from ad valorem taxes as set forth in the Resolution. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy additional ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in abatements or taxes. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered Bonds in the denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. • • • The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the home rule charter and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required, and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional, statutory or charter limitation of indebtedness. The City Council has designated the Bonds as "qualified tax exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or manual signatures of the Mayor and City Administrator and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA (Facsimile) (Facsimile) City Administrator Mayor CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is the Bond delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. 8 - 30 - • • • By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, will be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants in common TEN ENT -- as tenants by entireties UNIT GIFT MIN ACT Custodian (Cust) (Minor) JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common under Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. 9 - 3 1 - • Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program ( "STAMP "), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program ( "SEMP "), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program ( "MSP ") or other such "signature guarantee program" as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, SEMP or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Bond Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this Bond is held by joint account.) • Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee • PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within Bond has been registered on the books of the Registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of Registration Signature of Registered Owner Officer of Registrar Cede & Co. Federal ID #13- 2555119 3.02. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, which is to be 10 -32- • • • complete except as to dating thereof and cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each Bond. Section 4. Payment; Security; Pledges and Covenants. 4.01. (a) The Bonds are payable from the General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C Debt Service Fund (the "Debt Service Fund ") hereby created. The "Abatements" collected by the City from the "Abatement Parcels ", as such terms are defined in Resolution No. 06- 40 approved by the City Council on March 13, 2006 (the "Abatement Resolution "), are hereby pledged to the Debt Service Fund and amounts in this fund are irrevocably pledged to the Bonds. (b) The City Finance Director shall timely deposit in the Debt Service Fund the Abatements for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds in accordance with the terms of the Abatement Resolution. If any payment of principal or interest on the Bonds shall become due when there is not sufficient money in the Debt Service Fund to pay the same, the Finance Director is directed to pay such principal or interest from the general fund of the City, and the general fund will be reimbursed for such advances out of the proceeds of the Abatements and Taxes (defined hereinafter) when collected. The Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy an amount sufficient to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any limitation as to rate or amount. There is appropriated to the Debt Service Fund (i) capitalized interest in the amount of $ from proceeds of the Bonds, (ii) any amount over the minimum purchase price paid by the Purchaser, and (iii) the accrued interest paid by the Purchaser upon closing and delivery of the Bonds, if any. (c) Proceeds of the Bonds in the amount of $ will be applied to pay costs of issuance of the Bonds. (d) Proceeds of the Bonds in the amount of $ will be deposited in a separate construction fund pursuant to a Disbursing Agreement dated June 1, 2006 (the "Disbursing Agreement) between the City, the YMCA, the Lender (as defined in Section 1.05 hereof), and Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, as disbursing agent (the "Disbursing Agent "), together with proceeds of the City's $3,500,000 Revenue Note (YMCA Project) Series 2006C and $500,000 Revenue Note (YMCA Project) Series 2006B (together, the "Revenue Notes "), and together with certain funds provided by the YMCA. Proceeds of the Bonds so deposited will be disbursed for payment of costs of the Project (as defined in the Disbursing Agreement) in accordance with the terms of the Disbursing Agreement. Any balance of Bond proceeds remaining in the construction fund held by the Disbursing Agent after completion of the Project will be returned by the Disbursing Agent to the City, which amounts (if any) will be credited to the Debt Service Fund. 4.02. The City Administrator is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Manager of Property Records and Taxation of Anoka County and to obtain the certificate required by Section 475.63 of the Act. 4.03. Pledge of Tax Levy. It is determined that the principal amount of the Bonds does not exceed the estimated sum of the Abatements for the years authorized under the Abatement Resolution. For the purpose of paying a portion of the interest on the Bonds, there is levied a direct annual irrepealable ad valorem tax (Taxes) upon all of the taxable property in the City, 11 -33- • • which will be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general taxes of the City. The taxes will be credited to the Debt Service Fund above provided and will be in the years and amounts as follows (year stated being year of levy for collection the following year): Year Levy (See EXHIBIT B) Section 5. Authentication of Transcript. 5.01. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the Bonds and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, will be deemed representations of the City as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. The Mayor, City Administrator and Finance Director are hereby authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the Official Statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Official Statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the Official Statement. Section 6. Tax Covenant. 6.01. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code "), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 6.02. The City will comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Bonds under Section 103 of the Code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States. 6.03. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit it to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" (other than qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 12 - 34 - • • • 6.04. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: Code; (a) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the (b) the City designates the Bonds as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax- exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2006 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2006 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 6.05. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. Section 7. Book -Entry System; Limited Obligation of City. 7.01. The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered Bond for each of the maturities set forth in Section 1.03 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of the Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns ( "DTC "). Except as provided in this section, the outstanding Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 7.02. With respect to the Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City, the Bond Registrar and the Paying Agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other fmancial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds the Bond as securities depository (the "Participants ") or to any other person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of the Bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar), of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of the Bonds, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The City, the Bond Registrar and the Paying Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such Bonds for the purpose of payment 13 - 3 5 - • • • of principal, premium and interest with respect to such Bonds, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all other purposes. The Paying Agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of the Bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar, will receive a certificated Bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the City Administrator of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words "Cede & Co.," will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice, the City Administrator will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent. 7.03. Representation Letter. The City has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (the "Representation Letter ") which shall govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds. Any Paying Agent or Bond Registrar subsequently appointed by the City with respect to the Bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the Representation letter with respect to the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers Outside Book -Entry System. In the event the City, by resolution of the City Council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the Bonds that they be able to obtain a Bond certificate, the City will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of a Bond certificate. In such event the City will issue, transfer and exchange a Bond certificate as requested by DTC and any other registered owners in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities depository is appointed, the City will issue and the Bond Registrar will authenticate a Bond certificate in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 7.05. Payments to Cede & Co. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as the Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC's Operational Arrangements as set forth in the Representation Letter. Section 9. Continuing Disclosure. 9.01. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution, failure of the City to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the Bonds; however, any Bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this section. 14 - 3 6 - • • • 9.02. "Continuing Disclosure Certificate" means that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed by the Mayor and City Administrator and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. Section 10. Defeasance. 10.01. When the Bonds and all interest thereon, has been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants, and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds will cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the City for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will remain in full force and effect. The City may discharge the Bonds (or relevant portion thereof) which is due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full. If any Bonds should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank) 15 -37- • • • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 16 - 3 8 - STATE OF MINNESOTA • COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES • • ) SS. I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on July 24, 2006 with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of $2,460,000 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C of the City. WITNESS My hand officially as such City Administrator and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 2006. (SEAL) City Administrator Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • • STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA MANAGER OF PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION'S CERTIFICATE AS TO TAX LEVY AND REGISTRATON I, the undersigned Manager of Property Records and Taxation of Anoka County, Minnesota, hereby certify that a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, on July 24, 2006, levying taxes for the payment of the City's General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C, issued in the amount of $2,460,000, dated as of July 15, 2006, has been filed in my office and said obligations have been registered on he register of obligations in my office and that such tax has been levied as required by law. WITNESS My hand and official seal this day of , 2006. (SEAL) 291514v1(JAE) LN 140 -92 Manager of Property Records and Taxation Anoka, County, Minnesota Deputy • • Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in said City on Monday, July 24, 2006, commencing at 6:30 P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: * * * The Mayor announced that the next order of business was consideration of the proposals which had been received for the purchase of the City's $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D. The City Administrator presented a tabulation of the proposals that had been received in the manner specified in the Terms of Proposal for the Bonds. The proposals were as follows: After due consideration of the proposals, Member then introduced the following written resolution, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption: • • • RESOLUTION NO. 06 -118 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $570,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2006D; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows: Section 1. Sale of Bonds. 1.01. The proposal of (the "Purchaser ") to purchase $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D (the "Bonds ") of the City described in the Terms of Proposal thereof is found and determined to be a reasonable offer and is accepted, the proposal being to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ plus accrued interest to date of delivery, for Bonds bearing interest as follows: Year Interest Rate Year Interest Rate 2008 2013 2009 2014 2010 2015 2011 2016 2012 2017 True interest cost: 1.02. The sum of $ being the amount proposed by the Purchaser in excess of $562,020 shall be credited to the Debt Service Fund hereinafter created, as determined by the City's financial advisor. The City Finance Director is directed to deposit the good faith check of the Purchaser, pending completion of the sale of the Bonds, and to return the good faith checks of the unsuccessful proposers. The Mayor and City Administrator are directed to execute a contract with the Purchaser on behalf of the City. 1.03. The City will forthwith issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 (the "Act "), in the total principal amount of $570,000, originally dated August 15, 2006, in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, numbered No. R- 1, upward, bearing interest as above set forth, and maturing serially on February 1 without option of prior payment in the years and amounts as follows: 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 2 • • Year Amount Year Amount 2008 $50,000 2013 $60,000 2009 50,000 2014 60,000 2010 50,000 2015 60,000 2011 50,000 2016 65,000 2012 55,000 2017 70,000 1.04. Term Bonds. To be completed if Term Bonds are requested by the Purchaser. Section 2. Registration and Payment. 2.01. Registered Form. The Bonds will be issued only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, is payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 2.02. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond will be dated as of the last interest payment date preceding the date of authentication to which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment, unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which interest has been paid or made available for payment, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of authentication is prior to the first interest payment date, in which case the Bond will be dated as of the date of original issue. The interest on the Bonds will be payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2007, to the registered owners of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not that day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City will appoint a bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating agent and paying agent (the "Registrar "). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto are as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar must keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar provides for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of a Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 3 • after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until that interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. When Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar will authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity as requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. Bonds surrendered upon transfer or exchange will be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When a Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the Bond until the Registrar is satisfied that the endorsement on the Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar will incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name a Bond is registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of the Bond, whether the Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on the Bond and for all other purposes, and payments so made to a registered owner or upon the owner's order will be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon the Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. The Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof for a transfer or exchange of Bonds sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. If a Bond becomes mutilated or is destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar will deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that the Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it and as provided by law, in which both the City and the Registrar must be named as obligees. Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar will be cancelled by the Registrar and evidence of such cancellation must be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured 293490v1 SJB LNI40 -95 4 • or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it is not necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. 2.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City appoints U.S. Bank National Association, St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Administrator are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with the Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, the resulting corporation is authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar upon 30 days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar must deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and must deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or interest due date, without further order of this Council, the City Finance Director must transmit to the Registrar moneys sufficient for the payment of all principal and interest then due. 2.05. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds will be prepared under the direction of the City Administrator and executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator, provided that those signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. If an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be such officer before the delivery of a Bond, that signature or facsimile will nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, a Bond will not be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on the Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on a Bond is conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Administrator will deliver the same to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser is not obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.06. Temporary Bonds. The City may elect to deliver in lieu of printed definitive Bonds one or more typewritten temporary Bonds in substantially the form set forth in Section 3 with such changes as may be necessary to reflect more than one maturity in a single temporary bond. Upon the execution and delivery of definitive Bonds the temporary Bonds will be exchanged therefor and cancelled. Section 3. Foiiu of Bond. 3.01. The Bonds will be printed or typewritten in substantially the following foiiu: 5 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 • • No. R- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BOND, SERIES 2006D Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue February 1, 20_ August 15, 2006 Registered Owner: Cede & Co. CUSIP The City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, a duly organized and existing municipal corporation in Anoka County, Minnesota (the "City "), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the Registered Owner specified above or registered assigns, the principal sum of $ on the maturity date specified above without option of prior payment, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2007, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association, St. Paul, Minnesota, as Registrar, Paying Agent, Transfer Agent and Authenticating Agent, or its designated successor under the Resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. The City Council has designated the issue of Bonds of which this Bond forms a part as "qualified tax exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ") relating to disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions and within the $10 million limit allowed by the Code for the calendar year of issue. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $570,000 all of like original issue date and tenor, except as to number, maturity date, and interest rate, all issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on July 24, 2006 (the "Resolution "), for the purpose of providing money to aid in financing various improvements to the utility system of the City, pursuant to and in full conformity with the home rule charter of the City and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 293490vI SJB LNI40 -95 6 • • • and the principal hereof and interest hereon are payable primarily from the net revenues of the water and sewer utility system of the City in a special debt service fund of the City, as set forth in the Resolution to which reference is made for a full statement of rights and powers thereby conferred. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for payment of this Bond and the City Council has obligated itself to levy ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City in the event of any deficiency in net revenues pledged, which taxes may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this series are issued only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof of single maturities. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED That in and by the Resolution, the City has covenanted and agreed that it will continue to own and operate the water and sewer utility system free from competition by other like municipal utilities; that adequate insurance on said plant and system and suitable fidelity bonds on employees will be carried; that proper and adequate books of account will be kept showing all receipts and disbursements relating to the Utility Fund, into which it will pay all of the gross revenues from the water and sewer utility system; that it will also create and maintain a General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D Debt Service Fund, into which it will pay, out of the net revenues from the water and sewer utility system a sum sufficient to pay principal hereof and interest thereon when due; and that it will provide, by ad valorem tax levies, for any deficiency in required net water and sewer utility system revenues. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner's attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar will be affected by any notice to the contrary. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the home rule charter of the City and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 7 • as so required, and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional, statutory or charter limitation of indebtedness. This Bond is not valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon has been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile or manual signatures of the Mayor and City Administrator and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Dated: CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA (Facsimile) (Facsimile) City Administrator Mayor CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, will be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 8 • • • TEN COM - TEN ENT -- JT TEN -- - as tenants in common as tenants by entireties UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts or Transfers to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a financial institution that is a member of the Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program ( "STAMP "), the Stock Exchange Medallion Program ( "SEMP "), the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signatures Program ( "MSP ") or other such "signature guarantee program" as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, SEMP or MSP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 9 • • The Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the assignee requested below is provided. Name and Address: (Include information for all joint owners if this Bond is held by joint account.) Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee PROVISIONS AS TO REGISTRATION The ownership of the principal of and interest on the within Bond has been registered on the books of the Registrar in the name of the person last noted below. Date of Registration Signature of Registered Owner Officer of Registrar Cede & Co. Federal ID #13- 2555119 3.02. The City Administrator will obtain a copy of the proposed approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minnesota, which will be complete except as to dating thereof and will cause the opinion to be printed on or accompany each Bond. Section 4. Payment; Security; Pledges and Covenants. 4.01. (a) The City will create and continue to operate its Utility Fund to which will be credited all gross revenues of the water and sewer utility system and out of which will be paid all normal and reasonable expenses of current operations of the water and sewer utility system. Any balance therein are deemed net revenues and will be transferred, from time to time, to a General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D Debt Service Fund (the "Debt Service Fund ") hereby created in the Utility Fund, which fund will be used only to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds and any other bonds similarly authorized. There will always be retained in the Debt Service Fund a sufficient amount to pay principal of and interest on all the Bonds described in the resolution authorizing the sale of the Bonds, and the City Administrator must 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 10 • • report any current or anticipated deficiency in the Debt Service Fund to the City Council. There is appropriated to the Debt Service Fund (i) any amount over the minimum purchase price of the Bonds paid by the Purchaser, and (ii) the accrued interest paid by the Purchaser upon closing and delivery of the Bonds. (b) The proceeds of the Bonds, less the appropriations made in paragraph (a), together with any other funds appropriated during the construction of the Project financed by the Bonds (the "Project ") will be deposited in a separate construction fund to be used solely to defray expenses of the Project and the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the Projects. When the Project is completed and the cost thereof paid, the construction account is to be closed and any balance therein is to be deposited in the Debt Service Fund. 4.02. The City Council covenants and agrees with the holders of the Bonds that so long as any of the Bonds remain outstanding and unpaid, it will keep and enforce the following covenants and agreements: (a) The City will continue to maintain and efficiently operate the water and sewer utility system as public utilities and conveniences free from competition of other like municipal utilities and will cause all revenues therefrom to be deposited in bank accounts and credited to the water and sewer utility system accounts as hereinabove provided, and will make no expenditures from those accounts except for a duly authorized purpose and in accordance with this resolution. (b) The City will also maintain the Debt Service Fund as a separate account in the Utility Fund and will cause money to be credited thereto from time to time, out of net revenues from the water and sewer utility plant and system in sums sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. (c) The City will keep and maintain proper and adequate books of records and accounts separate from all other records of the City in which will be complete and correct entries as to all transactions relating to the water and sewer utility system and which will be open to inspection and copying by any bondholder, or the bondholder's agent or attorney, at any reasonable time, and it will furnish certified transcripts therefrom upon request and upon payment of a reasonable fee therefor, and said account will be audited at least annually by a qualified public accountant and statements of such audit and report will be furnished to all bondholders upon request. (d) The City Council will cause persons handling revenues of the water and sewer utility system to be bonded in reasonable amounts for the protection of the City and the bondholders and will cause the funds collected on account of the operations of the water and sewer utility system to be deposited in a bank whose deposits are guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Law. 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 11 • (e) The Council will keep the water and sewer utility system insured at all times against loss by fire, tornado and other risks customarily insured against with an insurer or insurers in good standing, in such amounts as are customary for like plants, to protect the holders, from time to time, of the Bonds and the City from any loss due to any such casualty and will apply the proceeds of such insurance to make good any such loss. (f) The City and each and all of its officers will punctually perform all duties with reference to the water and sewer utility system as required by law. (g) The City will impose and collect charges of the nature authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 at the times and in the amounts required to produce net revenues adequate to pay all principal and interest when due on the Bonds and to create and maintain such reserves securing said payments as may be provided in this resolution. (h) The City Council will levy general ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the City, when required to meet any deficiency in net revenues. 4.03. It is hereby determined that the estimated collection of net revenues for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet, when due, the principal and interest payments on the Bonds and that no tax levy is needed at this time. 4.04. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Manager of Property Records and Taxation of Anoka County and to obtain the certificate required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.63. Section 5. Authentication of Transcript. 5.01. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to the attorneys approving the Bonds, certified copies of proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other certificates, affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in their custody and under their control, relating to the validity and marketability of the Bonds, and such instruments, including any heretofore furnished, will be deemed representations of the City as to the facts stated therein. 5.02. The Mayor, City Administrator and Finance Director are authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the Official Statement prepared and circulated in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Official Statement is a complete and accurate representation of the facts and representations made therein as of the date of the Official Statement. 293490v1 SJB LNI40 -95 12 • • • Section 6. Tax Covenant. 6.01. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code "), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect at the time of such actions, and that it will take or cause its officers, employees or agents to take, all affirmative action within its power that may be necessary to ensure that such interest will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, as presently existing or as hereafter amended and made applicable to the Bonds. 6.02. The City will comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income of the interest on the Bonds under Section 103 of the Code, including without limitation requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States. 6.03. The City further covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to cause or permit them or any of them to be used, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 6.04. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code; (b) the City designates the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (c) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax- exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds that are not qualified 501(c)(3) bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all subordinate entities of the City) during calendar year 2006 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (d) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during calendar year 2006 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 6.05. The City will use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designations made by this section. 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 13 • • • Section 7. Book -Entry System; Limited Obligation of City. 7.01. The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of a separate single typewritten or printed fully registered Bond for each of the maturities set forth in Section 1.03 hereof. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each Bond will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns ( "DTC "). Except as provided in this section, all of the outstanding Bonds will be registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. 7.02. With respect to Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent will have no responsibility or obligation to any broker dealers, banks and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository (the "Participants ") or to any other person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds, including but not limited to any responsibility or obligation with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede & Co. or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person (other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown by the registration books kept by the Registrar), of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a registered owner of Bonds, of any amount with respect to principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The City, the Registrar and the Paying Agent may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal, premium and interest with respect to such Bond, for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bond, and for all other purposes. The Paying Agent will pay all principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or on the order of the respective registered owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, and all such payments will be valid and effectual to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a registered owner of Bonds, as shown in the registration books kept by the Registrar, will receive a certificated Bond evidencing the obligation of this resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the City Administrator of a written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the words "Cede & Co.," will refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt 'of such a notice, the City Administrator will promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Registrar and Paying Agent. 7.03. Representation Letter. The City has heretofore executed and delivered to DTC a Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (the "Representation Letter ") which shall govern payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and notices with respect to the Bonds. Any Paying Agent or Registrar subsequently appointed by the City with respect to the Bonds will agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the City in the 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 14 • • • Representation letter with respect to the Registrar and Paying Agent, respectively, to be complied with at all times. 7.04. Transfers Outside Book -Entry System. In the event the City, by resolution of the City Council, determines that it is in the best interests of the persons having beneficial interests in the Bonds that they be able to obtain Bond certificate, the City will notify DTC, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates. In such event the City will issue, transfer and exchange Bond certificates as requested by DTC and any other registered owner in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event, if no successor securities depository is appointed, the City will issue and the Registrar will authenticate Bond certificates in accordance with this resolution and the provisions hereof will apply to the transfer, exchange and method of payment thereof. 7.05. Payments to Cede & Co. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as a Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, payments with respect to principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond will be made and given, respectively in the manner provided in DTC's Operational Arrangements, as set forth in the Representation Letter. Section 8. Continuing Disclosure. 8.01. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution, failure of the City to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate is not to be considered an event of default with respect to the Bonds; however, any Bondholder may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this section. 8.02. "Continuing Disclosure Certificate" means that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate executed by the Mayor and City Administrator and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof. 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 15 • • • Section 9. Defeasance. 9.01. When all Bonds and all interest thereon, have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds will cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the City for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will remain in full force and effect. The City may discharge all Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full. If any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) 16 • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 17 • • • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) SS. CITY OF LINO LAKES ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on July 24, 2006 with the original minutes on file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D of the City. WITNESS My hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 2006. (SEAL) 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 City Clerk Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA MANAGER OF PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION'S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION WHERE NO AD VALOREM TAX LEVY I, the undersigned Manager of Property Records and Taxation of Anoka County, Minnesota, hereby certify that a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, on July 24, 2006, relating to General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D, in the amount of $570,000, dated August 15, 2006, has been filed in my office and said obligations have been registered on the register of obligations in my office. WITNESS My hand and official seal this day of , 2006. (SEAL) 293490v1 SJB LN140 -95 Manager of Property Records and Taxation Anoka County, Minnesota By Deputy • • • AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGNINATOR: Gordon Heitke, City Administrator MEETING DATE: July 24, 2006 TOPIC: Request to Use City Property for Blue Heron Days Carnival VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The Blue Heron Days Committee is requesting use of the city -owned property, adjacent and south of the American Legion, to be the site of a "kiddie" carnival, to operate in conjunction with Blue Heron Days. The site will be used for this purpose August 18th through the 20th. Specific information on proposed hours of operation, parking, sanitation and security is addressed in the attached letter of request. Staff has been in contact with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust and our insurance agent to determine appropriate insurance requirements of the carnival firm, performers and festival sponsors to minimize any liability exposure to the City. RECOMMENDATION Should the Council find it acceptable to grant permission to use city property for the carnival, staff is recommending the approval conditioned upon receipt of insurance certificates from all parties in the form recommended by LMCIT and the city's insurance agent. ATTACHMENTS 1. Blue Heron Days Committee letter, July 19, 2006 • • • Blue Heron rays July 19, 2006 Gordon Heitke, City Administrator City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Blue Heron Days — Carnival Dear Mr. Heitke, The Blue Heron Days Committee, comprised of the Lino Lakes Jaycees and Quad Area Chamber of commerce, is planning a kiddie carnival in conjunction with the 2006 Blue Heron Days. The best site for maximum exposure and ease of off - street parking is the three -acre site just south of the American Legion. This site is owned by the City of Lino Lakes The carnival owner has viewed the site and concluded there is ample space for five to six children rides, as well as on -site parking. Cars for parking will be directed to park in the far south area of the lot in a designated parking area. The carnival should only consume about '/2 of the site leaving the other 1/2 of the site available for parking. It is anticipated that all parking would be on the site and not on the neighborhood streets. The schedule for the carnival is as follows: Set -up will begin with equipment being delivered on Wend. Aug. 16th The carnival will be in operation: Friday, Aug. 18th from 4:00 pm — 9:00 pm Sat., Aug. 19th from9:00 am — 9:00 pm Sun. Aug. 20th from Noon — 5:00 pm All the rides will be torn down and completely removed from the site no later than Thursday, August 24th The American Legion has been contact. They are very willing to help where ever they will be needed. Three portable restroom units have been ordered, one of which will be handicap accessible. Quotes for on site trash containers and clean up are still being reviewed. The carnival requires an area of the site to park their trucks and campers. They will need to stay on site to provide night security for their equipment. • • • In addition, a group of volunteer pole vaulters from Flight Deck Athletics are planning to provide demonstration/competition to the public on Saturday, August 19. These pole vaulters will set up their equipment next to the kiddie carnival. The usable area is about 240 feet by 435 feet. The Pole vault will need a space 200' by 40' (they put down a lot of safety pads). Contacts for the carnival and the pole vaulting are: Carnival: Michelle Sylvander, 651 -203 -1715 Pole Vaulting: Dave Bauer, 651- 442 -4512 We respectfully request approval of the site for use during Blue Heron Days. We are excited that this will bring additional family entertainment and ensure that this event will continue to grow. 1 -63- • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND: AGENDA ITEM 6A Michael Grochala July 24, 2006 Resolution No. 06 -120, Authorizing Comprehensive Plan Update Consultant Contract with DSU, Inc. Simple Majority The City of Lino Lakes is required to update its Comprehensive Plan to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the information in the Met Council system statement for the City. The plan update is due in 2008. The City began the initial steps of the planning process with the completion of the Community Survey in the spring of this year. City staff has requested a proposal for professional services from DSU, Inc. to lead the Comprehensive Planning effort. DSU is one of the premier land use planning firms in the upper midwest and has extensive knowledge of Lino Lakes based on their involvement in the I -35E Corridor AUAR. DSU has proposed a Comprehensive Plan Update process that supports and integrates the Community Visioning Process being directed by Carl Neu. The process is also designed to complement and conform with the development of a Resource Management Plan staff is pursuing separately with Rice Creek Watershed District. The DSU planning team also includes the services of SRF Consulting Group and TKDA. SRF completed the City's 2001 Transportation Plan, and is involved in several transportation studies in the Lino Lakes area including Mn /DOT's 1 -35 Interregional Corridor Study, CSAH 14 Reconstruction Project, CSAH 14/35E Concept and Preliminary Design. The City also recently retained the services of SRF to complete a transportation cost allocation model for the 35E corridor. TKDA is the City's engineer and will be teaming with DSU to complete the sanitary sewer, water and surface water management components of the plan. The process is proposed to begin immediately with the Inventory and Analysis work and result in the submittal of the plan update to Met Council, for formal review, in January of 2008. DSU proposes to complete the work program for an estimated $216,785 including expenses. All billings will be based on an actual time plus materials basis. As an optional service SRF has proposed the development of a City wide Transportation Cost Allocation Model for an additional $15,804. • • • The project is proposed to be funded by the City's General fund, Trunk Utility and Surface Water Management Fund. In anticipation of the plan update the City has previously budgeted and set aside funds in 2005 and 2006 for this purpose. Additional general fund dollars will be required in 2007 and 2008. City staff will also continue to seek other potential funding sources including the Met Council's Local Planning Assistance Loan Program. RECOMMENDATION: Given the considerable involvement of the consultant team with previous city planning initiatives it is staff's opinion that the approval DSU proposal will result in a cost effective and stream lined planning process. Staff is recommending approval of the Comprehensive Plan Update consultant services contract with DSU, Inc., including the additional development of a Transportation Cost Allocation Model. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 06 -120 2. DSU Proposal • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 06 -120 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CONSULTANT SERVICES WHEREAS, City of Lino Lakes is required to update its Comprehensive Plan to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; and WHEREAS, DSU, Inc., has submitted a proposal to assist the City with the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan Update; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. that the proposal for Comprehensive Plan Update Consultant services is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized execute the agreement for services with DSU, Inc., on behalf of the City. • Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of July, 2006. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • AGENDA ITEM 6Bi STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 24 , 2006 TOPIC: Resolution No. 06 — 112, Approving Development Contract, Legacy Townhomes Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Legacy Townhomes provides for the construction of 21 residential townhome units on a parcel of land in the Legacy at Woods Edge Development. In accordance with the preliminary plat approval and City policy, staff has prepared a Development Contract. The contract provides for the following: 1. Submittal by the developer of a Letter of Credit in the amount of $188,750 representing 150 percent of the development improvement costs to insure completion of the project in accordance with the approved plans. 2. Deposit of a cash escrow in the amount of $145,565 to reimburse the City for costs incurred by the City related to the development and improvements of the site. Hartford Development Inc. has reviewed the contract and is aware of the conditions set forth. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 06 — 112, approving Development Contract, Legacy Townhomes. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution Number 06 — 112 be adopted. • • its adoption: Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 06 —112 RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT, LEGACY TOWNHOMES WHEREAS, the City's subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution of a development contract, between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes, prior to commencement of site construction activities and final plat approval to insure satisfactory completion of public improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves the Development Contract with Hartford Development Inc. for Legacy Townhomes and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the City. • John Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of July, 2006. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) THIS AGREEMENT made this 24th day of July, 2006, is by and between the City of Lino Lakes, whose address is 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, 55014, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", and HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT, INC. whose address 1300 Wells Fargo Plaza, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Bloomington, MN 55431, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ". WHEREAS, the Developer has received preliminary plat approval from the City Council for a plat of land within the corporate limits of the City known as LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE (the "Plat ") WHEREAS, the Developer intends to develop the first phase of its Legacy Townhomes project on certain parcels of land contained in the Plat, hereinafter called the "Subdivision ". Said land is legally described to -wit Lots 1 -22 Block 1 and Outlot B, LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, Anoka County, Minnesota, WHEREAS, the Developer requested that the City construct and finance certain improvements to service the Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of certain private improvements within the Subdivision; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 429 provides a method for assessing the cost of City installed improvements to the benefited property. WHEREAS, the City Subdivision Ordinance and Minnesota Statute 462.358 authorize the City to enter into a performance contract secured by cash escrow or other security to guarantee completion and payment of such improvements following final approval and recording of final plat; and • Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTTFS HERETO: that the I. DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Improvements to be installed at the Developer's expense by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to as "Developer Improvements ". B. Improvements to be installed by the City and financed by the Developer are hereinafter referred to as "City Improvements ". II. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS A. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare, at the Developer's expense, a grading plan, street and utility plan, and a surface water management plan. The Developer shall secure a contractor to install these improvements; said contractor shall be approved by the City at its ABSOLU l'L discretion. All Developer Improvements shall require City inspection and approval and, where appropriate, the approval of any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the following improvements according to the following terms and conditions: 1. Grading Plan a) A final site grading plan, including certified wetland delineation, with maximum two -foot contours and cross sections as necessary shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to commencement of any site grading. 2. Erosion Control Plan a) The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. b) The Developer shall submit a turf establishment plan which details topsoil placement, seeding, sodding, mulching, fertilizing and watering. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. Page 2 -71- • • Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 3. Grading and Erosion Control Construction & Maintenance a) Prior to the commencement of site grading and erosion control, the Developer shall complete items II.A.1, II.A.2, and II.A.3 as listed above. b) The Developer shall grade the site to within 0.2 foot of the grades shown on the approved grading plan. No deviations will be allowed unless a revised plan is submitted and approved by the City and all other regulatory agencies. c) All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented by the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the best potential for preventing soil erosion. d) Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures as required by the City shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. e) Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land shall be exposed at any one period of time. f) Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soil shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development. The Developer shall install four (4) inches of topsoil on all boulevards and seed or sod as approved by the City. The Developer shall make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops to bring them flush with the topsoil prior to occupancy. h) All disturbed areas shall be seeded. i) The front 50 feet of the lots, the street right -of -way, storm water storage ponds, and surface water drainage ways shall be graded prior to commencement of utility construction. j) Drainage swales, ditches, storm water storage ponds and other high risk erosion areas shall be protected from erosion. • Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 k) All remaining grading must be completed prior to issuance of building permits. 1) Protect streets from erosion deposits. This should include a combination of roadside silt fences, roadside sod strips, catch basin rock bale inlet protection, rock construction entrances, straw mulch, and /or street sweeping. m) The Developer's engineer shall certify, in writing with an as -built survey, that all grading complies with the grading plan prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Final private street grading, subbase, gravel base, bituminous binder course, and concrete curb and gutter. 5. Storni sewers when determined to be necessary by the City Engineer, including all necessary laterals, catch basins, inlets and other appurtenances. 6. Sanitary sewer, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services and other appurtenances. 7. Water, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services, hydrants, valves and other appurtenances. 8. The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block comers and at all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed after all street and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. Lot comer irons on the back property line shall be installed so that the top of the iron corresponds to the finished ground elevation in accordance with the approved grading plan - guard stakes shall be appropriately installed to mark these irons. The Developer agrees to maintain, at all times before acceptance of the streets by the City, an access road suitable for use by emergency, police and fire department equipment. The adequacy of such road shall be the sole determination of the City. Furthermore, such access road shall be located no more than 150 feet from any structure built within the Subdivision. 10. The Developer shall promptly clear dirt and debris, within public right -of- ways, and drainage and utility easements, resulting from construction by the Developer, its purchasers, builders and contractors within five (5) days after notification by the City. The Developer or its assigns shall be responsible for all necessary street and storm sewer maintenance including street sweeping, storm sewer cleaning, ditch cleaning and pond dredging, resulting from the accumulation of said dirt and debris, until all Page 4 - 7 3 - • • Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 Certificates of Occupancy are issued. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when the streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth, hard driving surface and adequate drainage on all temporary streets. 11. Street Lighting: a) Residential street lighting along public streets shall be owned and operated by the City. Such street lighting system shall be installed, operated, and maintained by the electric utility company. City and electric utility company may enter into a contractual agreement on the rate and maintenance of the street lighting system. Residential street lighting internal to the Subdivision shall be installed by Developer and owned by the homeowners association established to operate and govern the Legacy Townhome development. 12. The Developer shall dedicate to the City, prior to approval of the final plat, at no cost to the City, all permanent or temporary easements necessary for the construction and installation of the Developer Improvements. All such easements required by the City shall be in writing, in recordable form, containing such terms and conditions as the City shall determine. 13. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all site grading and development approvals and permits from all appropriate Federal, State, Regional and Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site grading or construction and prior to the City awarding construction contracts for public utilities. 14. The Developer shall make provision that all gas, telephone, cable TV and electric utility designs be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to construction of the streets. Following review and approval by the City, the Developer shall insure that all installations comply with applicable City, County and State design standards and show proof of security arrangements with said utility companies. 15. Cost of Developer Improvements and description are as shown on Attachment A. 16. Construction of Developer's Improvements: a) The construction, installation, materials and equipment shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. Page 5 -74- • • Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 b) All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City and, where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. c) Prior to the acceptance of Developer Improvements by the City, the Developer shall obtain final plat approval and record the final plat which will dedicate all permanent easements necessary for the construction and installation of the Developer and City Improvements as determined by the City. d) All construction debris and trash shall be properly disposed of at the Developer expense and in a timely manner as detennined by the City. 17. The Developer shall construct and pay for all improvements as described in the landscaping plan. 18. Guarantee a) Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letters of Credit (1) The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all telins and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Developer Improvements and hereby guarantees the workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the City's final acceptance of the Developer's Improvements. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty (150 %) percent of the total estimated cost of Developer's Improvements. An Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Lino Lakes and shall state thereon that the same is issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the tends and conditions of this Development Contract and construction of all required improvements in accordance with the ordinances and specifications of the City. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the terms and conditions of this contract. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended for additional periods of one year from present or future • Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 expiration dates unless thirty (30) days prior to such the City Clerk or Administrator is notified in writing by certified mail that the Letter of Credit will not be renewed. b) Reduction of Escrow Guarantee. (1) The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit, or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed improvements at the time of the requested reduction. Prior to the final acceptance of the Developer Improvements the City shall require a Performance Bond or Cash Escrow to cover the one -year warranty provisions of the agreement. The amount shall be deteuuined by the City Engineer. III. CITY IMPROVEMENTS A. The city will construct, install and maintain at the City's sole expense the following City improvements for this project. 1. All streetscaping adjacent to public street, including sidewalks, sod /grass, • boulevard trees and street lighting within street Right -of -Way. IV. RECORDING AND RELEASE A. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Page 1 hereof. City shall provide to Developer upon payment of all the special assessments levied against a parcel, a release of such parcel from the terms and conditions of this Development Contract subject to provisions contained in this contract. • V REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS A. The Developer agrees to establish a non - interest bearing escrow account with the City in an amount determined by the City Administrator or his designee for the payment of all costs incurred by the City related to the development of the Subdivision and the Developer Improvements including, but not limited to, the following (See Attachment B for breakdown of costs): 1. Plat Review Fee 2. Planner Review Fee Page 7 - 7 6 - • • 3. Administration - 3% Construction Cost 4. Engineering a) Administration 5. Legal - Plat Review 6. Publications 7. Park Dedication Fee 8. Traffic Signing Improvements 9. Street - Storm Sewer - Pond Maintenance 10. Aerial Photo Recovery Cost Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 11. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Trunk charges listed in paragraph 8A, 8C, 9A and 9C of Exhibit A attached hereto. B. If the above escrow amounts are insufficient, the Developer shall make such additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to reimburse itself from the Escrow upon notice to the Developer, with suitable documentation supporting charge. VI. BUILDING PERMITS A. The Developer agrees that building permits may be issued upon approval of the Final Plat by the City Council. All required Financial Security shall be in place with the City prior to the commencement of Developer Improvements under Paragraph II herein. B. The Developer further agrees that City Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer, and Bituminous Base Construction of the Streets, temporary street signs, gas, electric, and telephone will be completed prior to the issuance of building peimits. C. The Developer further agrees that an as -built survey certifying that all the grading complies with the grading plan prior to issuance of building pennits. D. Each lot must comply with erosion control measures to prevent any material from leaving the lot. The City of Lino Lakes will not perform any requested inspections on the lot until it complies with the erosion control requirements. E. Each lot must have a City approved Certificate of Grading showing the as -built survey prior to an issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer, its purchasers. builders or contractors to ensure compliance with the grading plan. • • • VII. HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 A. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours as follows: Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed VIII. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. IX. INSURANCE A. Developer or all its subcontractors shall take out and maintain until one (1) year after the City has accepted the Developer Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of his subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less then Two Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The City, its employees, its agents and assigns shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer or all its subcontractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. X. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE A. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees if the City prevails in such action. XI. VALIDITY A. If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, • • Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. XII. GENERAL A. Binding Effect 1. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. B. Notices 1. Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1 by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above. C. Final Plat Approval 1. The City agrees to give final approval to the plat of the Subdivision upon execution and delivery of this agreement and all required petitions, and documents. XIlI. VIOLATIONSBUILDING PERMITS A. In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Development Contract and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set out hereunder may refuse to issue building permits and /or Certificate of Occupancies to any property within the Subdivision until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City. XIV. PARK DEDICATION A. Park dedication for Legacy Townhomes Addition will be $2,075 per unit for 21 units, which totals $43,575, which shall be payable to the City prior to the commencement of Developer Improvements under Paragraph II herein. • • XV. PROPERTY TAXES Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 A. Should the recording of the Final Plat occur after July 1, any and all property taxes on any public property dedicated as a part of this plat shall be the responsibility of the Developer. Dollars shall be incorporated into the escrow agreement to cover the cost of said property taxes. XVI. HOME OWNER ASSOCIATION A. The Developer shall provide to the City, for its approval, a copy of all necessary association documents said documents shall include an Operation and Maintenance Agreement. The following shall be included in such agreement, or shall be specifically provided for in a separate recordable agreement; 1. Maintenance of private improvements (i.e. lighting, utilities, snow removal). 2. Provisions for implementation of Surface Water Runoff Best Management Practices (BMP's). 3. Provisions for maintaining Open Space and Infiltration Areas. 4. Provisions for snow removal of public sidewalks. XVII. EASEMENTS, DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING EASEMENT AT NO COST TO THE CITY: A. Ingress /egress easements in favor of the City to the stouinwater ponds located on Outlot B, The Village No. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota, for maintenance purposes. B. Trail Easement to be more specifically described on the southern portion of Outlot B, The Village No. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota, to provide connection from the public street /sidewalk to the existing Rice Creek Chain of Lakes trail system. • • Dated: By STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA Development Contract Legacy Townhomes (Phase I) July 24, 2006 , 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: Its: By: Its: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2006, by , the and , the of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota on behalf of said City. Notary Public [Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Contract for Subdivision /Planned Unit Development] • • • Dated: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss COUNTY OF ANOKA .2006 HARTFORD DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Minnesota corporation By: Keith Gruebele Its: Chief Financial Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2006, by Keith Gruebele the Chief Financial Manager of Hartford Development, Inc, a Minnesota Corporation on behalf of said Corporation. Notary Public [Separate Signature Page to Release of Obligations Under Contract for Subdivision /Planned Unit Development] • ATTACHMENT A SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NAME: Legacy Townhomes APPLICANT: Hartford Development Group Inc. ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS 1 SITE GRADING 2 EROSION CONTROL 3 SITE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 4 LANDSCAPING 6 STREET /ACCESS CONST. 7 STORM SEWER CONST. A. Trunk B. Lateral C. Surface Water Mgmt. Charge (s.f.) 8 SANITARY SEWER CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) B. Trunk Credit C. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) D. Lateral 9 WATERMAIN CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) B. Trunk Credit C. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) D. Lateral • • NOTE: BUDGET COST Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate NOTE e e e e e Estimate e Estimate e $0.077 a $2,640 a $1,145 Estimate e $2,815 a $1,845 a Estimate e TOTALS See Attachment B for security amounts to be posted a: b: c: d: e: f: Cost by City policy Estimated Cost or Budget by City Previously Assessed Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board Provided by Developer Estimate by Feasibility Study NUMBER OF REU's: 21 ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 1.45 DEVELOPER IMP. (X) $40,000 $8,750 $5,000 $28,000 $66,000 $5,000 $13,000 $11,500 $11,500 $188,750 7/24/2006 CITY ESCROW IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) $4,865 $3,828 $24,045 $4,082 $38,745 $75,565 • ATTACHMENT B CITY FEES DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NAME: Legacy Townhomes APPLICANT: Hartford Development Group Inc. ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS 1 PLANNING /REVIEW A. Plat Review Fee B. Planner Review Fee 2 ENGINEERING A. Plan /Plat/Grading Review B. Preparation of Plans & Specs. C. Construction Services D. Construction Staking E. City Engineering 3 ADMINISTRATION A. Administration Fee - 3% of const. B. Legal C. Publications 4 DEVELOPMENT FEES A. Park Dedication C. Aerial Photo Fee DEVELOPMENT SECURITIES A. Street, St. Swr., Pond Maint. TOTALS: 7/24/2006 NUMBER OF REU's: 21 ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 1.45 BUDGET DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW COST NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) 3% of const. $1,000 $1,000 b b b b b b b a b b $2075 /Unit d $90 /unit a SECURITY AMOUNTS TO BE POSTED X = DEV. IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 1.5 (LETTER OF CREDIT) Y = CITY IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 0.35 (LETTER OF CREDIT) Z = CITY FEE COSTS X 1.0 (CASH ESCROW) NOTE a: Cost by City policy b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City c: Previously Assessed d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board e: Provided by Developer f: Estimate by Feasibility Study • b Att. A Att. B $188,750 $0 $0 $0 $75,565 $70,000 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $0 $3,750 $0 $1,250 $5,663 $1,000 $1,000 $43,575 $1,890 $4,372 $70,000 Total $188,750 so $145,565 • AGENDA ITEM 6.B.ii STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: July 24, 2006 TOPIC: Resolution 06 -119 Planned Unit Development - Final Plan Legacy Townhomes BACKGROUND Hartford Group Inc. has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a portion of the townhome property within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the units and the final plat of the first phase of development that includes three buildings and a total of 21 units. ANALYSIS Governing Plans This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit Development for the site. The proposed layout is significantly conforming to the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout that is included in the Development Guide. Some changes that have occurred through the grading and street projects the city has undertaken have included the moving of the `Woods Edge' street west to allow homes to be built on the east side of the site. Also, changes have arising due to the fact that previous plans only depicted back to back type of units with tuck under parking. The applicant is now proposing a different product for a portion of the site. The proposed townhoines are located in a Residential Land Use Area and will be located within a portion of Lot 15 (according to the land use plan of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide). The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates that there is a 50% build -to line requirement for this portion of the site; but no `Required Building Entries' nor any `Gateways' are indicated for the portion of the residential site currently proposed for development. Density and Diversity The standards require between 10 and 24 units per acre, not to exceed 190 units. The current proposal includes 98 units within 14 buildings. This would occur on 9.42 acres for a density of 10.4 units per acre. The future development of the corner parcel should only increase that density figure. -85- Legacy Townhomes, page 2 As mentioned previously, the district boundaries have seen minor adjustment due to the continuing road project, more detailed evaluation of the site, and the change in townhome product type. The standards require that a variety of housing types is provided within the residential area, for the entire townhome development the applicant is proposing a seven -plex townhome with two distinct facade treatments; and in the future the portion of the site adjacent to the traffic circle will provide a distinctly different type of building likely to include underground parking. Building Massing and Placement The grading plan shows that the developer has minimized grade changes to limit the use of retaining walls as much as possible. For the majority of the buildings all grade changes will be done with sloping. All retaining walls used are below the five foot requirement. The buildings measure no greater than 39 feet in height from any grade level and entries for each unit are accessible to either open space or public street. The buildings are sited 15 feet from right of ways with patio /yard areas in front of each unit to maintain the street presence and create the transition zone between private spaces of the homes and the public spaces. The parking for each unit is provided with depressed grade parking on the first floor rear of each building unit with landscaping in between each garage and for some driveways for additional parking. • The setbacks for this type of product are as follows: Table 7. Residence and Garage Setbacks (measured from lot line unless otherwise noted) Structure Setbacks Side Setbacks (excluding Street - Facing Sides) [l, 3] Street- facing Front and Side Setbacks [l, 2] Rear Setbacks RESIDENCE SETBACKS Attached residences with individual unit entrances 10' min. -15' max., or 5' if garage is alley- loaded. 15' min. from centerline of alley, or 15' min. from rear property line when no alley 5' on each side of structure, 0' between attached units in one structure, GARAGE SETBACKS Garages or parking lots for duplexes, townhomes, or other attached units with individual unit entrances Min. l'from dwelling facade for every 2' of garage facade width. [4] No garage shall comprise more than 50 percent of the width of the total street - facing frontage for each unit. 12' min. from centerline of alley, or 3' min. from rear property line if no alley 5' on each side of separate garage structures, 0' between attached garages in one structure NOTES: • [1] Projections. Bay windows, fireplace elements, and balconies may extend into the front setback up to four feet, for a width not more than 10 feet. The maximum extension of a projection into a side yard is 3 feet. [2] Depressed Parking. Where a high water table prevents depressed parking, at -grade structured parking must be placed at the rear of the structure with residential uses lining the front facade to finished grade. - 86 - Legacy Townhomes, page 3 Staff believes that all of these setbacks are being met, though the intention of some is a bit lost due to notations 11113 and 4 being absent from the approved guidelines. Specifically, it is staff's belief that the setback of the garage from dwelling facade is only applicable to garages that are on the front facade. Architectural Standards The Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guidelines (LLTCDDG) typically require a base, middle, and top approach to the commercial architecture within the Legacy at Woods Edge project. However, it does not require this within the residential architectural standards. So that approach will not be followed. All units include windows within the doors, as well as surrounding the doorway for transparency and daylighting. All doors (including the garage doors) are also panelized for further detail. Windows for the units cover well over 25% of the front facades and on the main living floor of each unit the windows are within the parlors and dining rooms. Staff has recommended a condition that will address the need for a recess of at least two inches for all windows and doors. There is also a recommended condition prohibiting slider windows, as is mandated by the design standards for the project. The developer has provided a great deal of variation in the roof forms of the buildings including the changes in heights and the addition of gabled doiuuers. For the patio areas that are provided at the front of the units the applicant is proposing a decorative wrought iron fencing that will be repeated on any retaining walls that might be necessary for grade changes. Staff would like to see the developer wrap the corners of the buildings with the patio area to address the need to improve the • building sides that are visible at street corners. Parking Requirements The standards require two parking spaces per unit, which will be accommodated within the garages for each unit. The guidelines do not require guest parking because of the on -site parking on the street frontages. However, because of the location of some of the units the applicant has proposed to provide an additional 32 parking stalls which staff would like to see reduced by six so that the parking closest to Town Center Parkway and Village Drive is eliminated in favor of additional green space and landscaping. Open Space and Landscaping Chapter 4 of the guidelines does not address landscaping, therefore staff will use some of the Chapter 3.6 standards to guide the landscaping of the site. We will work with the developer prior to the next meeting to make sure appropriate materials and design are implemented. Specifically staff has a desire to further the screening along the freeway to reduce the visibility and noise for the northern most townhome building. Additionally, staff would like to take the spaces that are reclaimed by eliminating the six parking spaces indicated above and create nice landscape /plaza amenities. The guidelines required 10% of the residential site to be developed as public accessible open space. The plans appear to be providing this with the central park element and the large swath of open space adjacent to the wetlands that is accessible via the street on the back side of the townhomes. The developer has submitted an exhibit that shows 21% of the site is being developed as public accessible open space. �Liahtina Legacy Townhomes, page 4 Chapter 4 of the guidelines does not include lighting standards, but the photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. The lighting proposed for the townhome area is the standard lighting that is being used throughout the Legacy project area. Engineering Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), the city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project, has reviewed the plans submitted by Hartford and has issued a letter that outlines all of their comments. The developer will be required to satisfy these comments prior to the approval of any building permits for the site. Final Plat Planned Unit Development - Final Plan applications include a final plat for the site and Hartford has submitted a final plat entitled Legacy Townhomes that includes the first phase of the project consisting of three buildings. Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), the city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project, has reviewed the final plat and issued a letter that outlines all of their comments. The final plat does need some additional drainage and utility easements added, and these will be required prior to the final plat mylars being signed and released for recordation. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the March 29th regular meeting. Their comments are attached to this report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer will enter into a development agreement with the city prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 2. Per the site development guidelines, a minimum 2 inch deep window trim or two inch recess must be provided and sliding windows are prohibited. 3. All lighting fixtures must be submitted and prove to be in conformance with the requirements of the LLTCDDG. 4. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review letter must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff, including the proper drainage and utility easements being shown on the final plat mylars. 5. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Homeowner's association documents must be submitted prior to the city releasing the plat for recordation. 7. The applicant shall provide a bicycle parking area sufficient in size to accommodate an appropriate number of bicycles. The type of fixture provided and the location of this parking area must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building_ permits for the site. - 8 8 - • • Legacy Townhomes, page 5 8. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. 9. All ground and roof mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view with appropriate landscaping materials or materials consistent with those used for construction of the main buildings. 10. The mailboxes proposed for the development must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. Such mailboxes shall be screened with complementary materials to those of the main structures. 11. The six parking spaces shown on the site plan closest to Town Center Parkway and Village Drive shall be eliminated and replaced with additional landscaping materials. 12. The appropriate access easements for the ponds will be granted to the city for maintenance purposes. 13. A conservation easement shall be granted to the city over a portion of Outlot B, The Village No. 3; and signs shall be placed to visually delineate the wetland area. 14. The landscape plan shall be revised to include additional landscaping on the north side of the project to provide a visual and noise barrier between the northernmost building and the freeway; and shall be reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator for conformance to the Environmental Board's comments prior to installation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 06 -119 • 2. Engineering Comments dated April 24, 2006. 3. Environmental Board comments dated April 6, 2006. 4. Revised Legacy Townhome Architectural Plan Set received May 4, 2006. 5. Legacy Townhome Final Plat received July 18, 2006. - 8 9 - • Legacy Townhomes, page 6 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 06 -119 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN FOR THE LEGACY TOWNHOMES. WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a planned unit development — final plan approval for property currently described to -wit: Outlots B, C, and D; THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota. ; and WHEREAS, the planned unit development — final plan approval request is based on the following submittals: 1. Revised Legacy Townhome Architectural Plan Set received May 4, 2006. 2. Legacy Townhome Final Plat received July 18, 2006. • ;and WHEREAS, at their meeting on May 10, 2006; the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the planned unit development — final plan subject to the conditions listed in the meeting minutes; and WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide subject to certain conditions of approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the planned unit development — final plan for the Legacy Townhomes subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer will enter into a development agreement with the city prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 2. Per the site development guidelines, a minimum 2 inch deep window trim or two inch recess must be provided and sliding windows are prohibited. 3. All lighting fixtures must be submitted and prove to be in conformance with the requirements of the LLTCDDG. 4. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review letter must be addressed to the satisfaction of city • staff, including the proper drainage and utility easements being shown on the final plat mylars. 5. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. - 9 0 - • • Legacy Townhomes, page 7 6. Homeowner's association documents must be submitted prior to the city releasing the plat for recordation. 7. The applicant shall provide a bicycle parking area sufficient in size to accommodate an appropriate number of bicycles. The type of fixture provided and the location of this parking area must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. 8. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. 9. All ground and roof mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view with appropriate landscaping materials or materials consistent with those used for construction of the main buildings. 10. The mailboxes proposed for the development must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. Such mailboxes shall be screened with complementary materials to those of the main structures. 11. The six parking spaces shown on the site plan closest to Town Center Parkway and Village Drive shall be eliminated and replaced with additional landscaping materials. 12. The appropriate access easements for the ponds will be granted to the city for maintenance purposes. 13. A conservation easement shall be granted to the city over a portion of Outlot B, The Village No. 3; and signs shall be placed to visually delineate the wetland area. 14. The landscape plan shall be revised to include additional landscaping on the north side of the project to provide a visual and noise barrier between the northernmost building and the freeway; and shall be reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator for conformance to the Environmental Board's comments prior to installation. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of July 2006. John Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of July, 2006. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: • Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. � SEH • April 24, 2006 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RECEIVED APR 2 5 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Legacy Townhomes Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.12 SPCV Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Legacy Townhomes site at Legacy at Woods Edge, as prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed site were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on April 4, 2006. Preliminary Site Plan (Sheet C2.0) 1. The detail call -outs on the plan sheet reference a detail sheet that was not provided in this submittal. The patio area fence on the easternmost unit of Building 7 has a fence post shown located in the sidewalk. Sidewalk must maintain five feet of clear width; the fence should be realigned to remain clear of the sidewalk. 3. No handicap accessible parking is shown for the internal site parking. The site parking should meet ADA requirements. 4. The applicant may wish to consider adding a fence and gate along the east side of the public trail, west of Building 9. This would direct the public away from the sidewalk in front of the Building 9 patio areas. 5. An access route to Pond 3 surfaced with either pavement or gravel must be provided from either Village Drive near the lift station, or the drive between Buildings 9 and 10 down to the pond area. Currently, no access path is shown. Preliminary Enlargement Plans (Sheet C2.1) 1. The Community Park Enlargement Layout and Landscape Plan shown on this page has a call -out stating "D412 curb around perimeter of tot lot ". A 4 -inch high curb bordering the bituminous path will trap water on the path. The applicant needs to identify where this water will be directed to and how it will be conveyed into the storm sewer system. Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. Proposed slopes cannot exceed 4:1. Edit grading note 7 to reflect this. Proposed grading south of Buildings 9 and 10 is shown encroaching on the regional park. All grading operations must remain within the site. The proposed grading needs to be revised to reflect this constraint. Short E lliott Hendrickson inc., 3c" "- -'--ais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196 SEH is an equal opportunity employer www.seh - 9 2 651.490.2000 800.325.2055 651.490.2150 fax • Mr. Michael Grochala April 24, 2006 Page 2 3. Proposed grading around Buildings 9 and 10 must be revised to incorporate an access route to Pond 3, as stated previously. The proposed grading, as currently shown, will not allow vehicle access to Pond 3. 4. The sidewalk between Buildings 13 and 14 has a slope that is 20% or greater. Slopes on sidewalks cannot exceed 5 %. 5. The sidewalk at the southwest corner of Building 7 has a slope of 10 %. Slopes on sidewalks cannot exceed 5 %. 6. The grading between Building 1 and CBMH 110, as shown, appears to be flat. The rim elevation of CBMH 110 could be lowered to provide positive drainage from the sidewalk to the catch_basin. 7. It appears retaining walls will be required for some of the buildings fronting Village Drive, Town Center Parkway, and Woods Edge Boulevard. 8. Two rows of silt fence should be installed along the existing wetland, as additional protection at the base of the proposed slope. 9. Emergency overflows should be identified for interior drive aisles. Slope stabilization in these areas may be required. 10. Erosion control blanket is required where storm sewer outlets intersect pond slopes. • Preliminary Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Plan (Sheet C4.0) 1. Note 10 on the plan sheet indicates that hydrants are to be located 5 feet behind back of curb. City standards require hydrants to be located 4 feet behind back of curb. 2. Gate valves should be shown where required on the plans (hydrants, wet taps, etc.). • 3. Show all water service lines coming off of Woods Edge Boulevard as beginning at the right -of -way line. Stubs will be provided "by others" to the right -of -way line. 4. The hydrant leads between Buildings 11 and 12 and Buildings 13 and 14 shall be 6 -inch diameter rather than the 8 -inch diameter as shown. All hydrant leads shall have 6 -inch diameter pipe. 5. Sanitary manhole 2 and CBMH 209 are located too close together to be constructed as shown. 6. The size of the water line on the west side of Building 14 is not labeled. 7. The westerly invert elevation for sanitary manhole MH -B in Woods Edge Boulevard shall be revised to match the elevation of the north -south invert. 8. Show the sanitary sewer services off of Woods Edge Boulevard as connecting to stubs "by others" at the right -of -way line. 9. The applicant should flatten the pipe grade from sanitary MH -A to MH 9 to minimum grade and should steepen the pipe grade from MH 9 to MH 10 to increase cleanout velocities in the dead end run of pipe. Having the dead end run of pipe, with its lower flows, at a slope greater than minimum will aid in keeping the pipe cleanout velocities higher. - 9 3 - RECEDE APR 2 5 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • Mr. Michael Grochala April 24, 2006 Page 3 10. The hydrant between Buildings 11 and 12 conflicts with a proposed light pole. One or the other must be moved to provide clear access to the hydrant. 11. Applicant shall provide locations of proposed sewer and water services in Village Drive, Town Center Parkway, and Woods Edge Boulevard. 12. Sanitary manhole castings shall be Type R- 1642 -B. Preliminary Storm Sewer Plan (Sheet C4.1) 1. We recommend that CBMH 201 be moved northward so the storm sewer between CBMH 201 and Woods Edge Boulevard is moved farther away from the northwest corner of Building 3. _ STMH 104 must be moved so that the storm pipe from CBMH 109 to STMH 104 will maintain a 10- foot separation with the water main, as required by the Minnesota Department of Health. 3. The southwestern corner of the courtyard for the southernmost unit in Building 9 is shown as being constructed over the existing storm sewer. Either the courtyard should be revised so that no construction occurs above the storm sewer pipe or the storm sewer line must be relocated. 4. No details or quantities for rip -rap are given for FES 400. 5. STMH 401 is too shallow. The apparent 2.37 -foot build height would be exceeded by the sum of pipe diameter + wall thickness + top slab thickness + casting height. 6. The applicant should consider adding stubs at STMH 104 and CBMH 105 for future storm design flexibility on the western half of the site. Resize downstream storm sewer accordingly if stubs are provided. 7. The storm sewer connection from CBMH 301 cannot be made as shown. Connection to the existing storm sewer shall be made by utilizing a new structure at the point of connection. 8. Storm sewer pipe classes must be shown. Preliminary Lighting Plan (Sheet C4.2) 1. An additional light pole shall be installed on the south end of the drive aisle between Buildings 9 and 10. Proposed light poles are 2 feet shorter than City street lights but this may be appropriate for interior residential areas. 3. Lighting levels in the drive aisles and parking areas are not continuous but are appropriate for residential uses. Preliminary Landscape Plan (Sheet C5.0) 1. Applicant shall verify plantings around Pond 3 will not interfere with the required pond access road. 2. Planting trees on top of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, or water mains is not allowed. 3. Additional screening around the lift station site is recommended. - 9 4 - r- ECE V D APR 25 200E CCTV oitz lo LAKES • • Mr. Michael Grochala April 24, 2006 Page 4 Preliminary Plat (Sheet C7.0) 1. Drainage and utility easements (existing and proposed) must be shown on the plat. 2. Existing street right -of -way widths must be shown. 3. Village Drive shall be labeled on the plat. 4. Plat dimensions and bearings must be shown. General Comments 1. There was no detail sheet included in the submittal, so we are unable to review details referenced in the plan sheets. Please call me at 65 1.490.2147 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. 07° Robert L. Moberg, PE Project Manager nm x:\ko \linol\030512Uegacy townhome review.doc c: Paul Bengtson, City of Lino Lakes Aaron Archbold, Hartford Group, Inc. - 9 5 - RECEIVED APR 2 5 2006 LCT''Lcrrte JAKEs • • • Memo Environmental To: Paul Bengtson From: Marty Asleson Date: April 6, 2006 Re: March 29, 2006 Environmental Board Recommendations The February 22, 2006 Environmental Board made the following recommendations for the Legacy Townhomes: Landscaping • Several changes should be made to the plant schedule. Recommend changing Sunburst Honeylocust to straight thornless Honeylocust. Sugar maples will not do well in the sandy soils of Woods Edge. Red or Sunburst maples should be substituted for the Sugar maples. Americanna /native (Redmond) Lindens should be substituted for the Cordata /non native (Greenspire) Lindens. European larch should be changed to the native Eastern Larch. Ponderosa pine should be changed to native White Pine or Red Pine. The area to the east of impervious areas and bordering the basin area (trail location area) should be planted with native Eastern Larch in the wet to mesic soils, and white oak with Red oak in the upland areas. • Conservation Easement areas should be planted with the City Native Seed mix • Top soil note in the landscape plan. Should read "all areas disturbed by construction activities except for native specified seed areas should have 4 inches of loam top soil thourghly incorporated into the subsoil and seeded or sodded..." Again, where native plants are specified, no topsoil shall be specified. • Raingarden and infiltration basins...should read "shall receive the City specified native seed mix." • Under the Sodding Installation Notes, should read "4 inches of top soil should be thouroughly incorporated into the subsoil." Areas to receive sod should not be fertilized with a 10 -10 -10 fertilizer. A starter fertilizer with "0" phospherous must be used. • Page 1 -96- • • • • Under the seeding section of the notes, there should be no specification for top soil /organic matter incorporation into the infiltration basin areas. In filtration basin areas should be seeded with the City native seed mix and any changes approved by the City of Lino Lakes. • Sodded Areas must be irrigated. • Runoff shall be directed into the storm sewers or infiltration tans when applicable. • Signs shall be placed at the edge of the wetlands. • The landscape plan shall be reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator prior to installation. Conservation Easement Recommendation • The area to the east of impervious areas and bordering the basin area be placed in a Conservation Easement with the City named as the easement holder. No top soil should brought in for native seed areas. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan A copy of the mandatory Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) submitted to the MPCA for approval should be submitted to the City of Lino Lakes Environmental for Review and Approval before any construction activity proceedes. A copy of the final approved plan must be maintained on site with the required weekly and post storm event inspection reports. The SWPPP site manager's name should be submitted to the City with how to contact this person. The location of this site must be indicated on the SWPPP. The SWPPP must indicate where rock entrances to the site construction area will be placed. The rock entrance must be at least 50 feet in length. The rock must be 1.5 inches in diameter and maintained for rock pore space. The SWPPP must indicate a "trigger point' for cleaning silt fence areas. Silt fences must be cleaned when the fences becomel /3 full. The SWPPP must indicate specific plans and intentions for dewatering on anticipated and unanticipated storm events. The plan must indicate procedures for dewatering that would prevent turbid /floculant waters from leaving the site. The plan should also indicate a method to control wind erosion off of the site. The SWPPP must show one, and only one area on the site where cement trucks will clean their tanks. This area must be protected from the movement of cleaned materials from the clean site. The SWPPP must indicate disposal of Cement Truck Cleaning materals after construction is finished. All storm water sewer inlets must be protected with a mechanical device such as the Royal Industries Infra Safe device. Lighting All security lighting that may be installed on the Town Homes must meet City specifications. • Page 2 -97- • 1 4 /1/ ' r /ter i.-rr EXISTING � ". 11Nlmlm • r 1 WET md@T"m) =Me Waldaft KM WWI. ik 'am rtm.1 blISIM ME SS RCM. MOAN 131/WILE WM. mar ParrITNN EXISTING WETLAND ..a .m.wUMW m..% C) EXISTING WETLAND . -- LAYOUT AND PAVING NOTE: COLOIS 1412.3 16.1 We LP 1 U.N. IF WILICILI. WM. ILL LOWS WO WV= LLIKUott WOKS APPIWW. m'w 410 a° s°4m LOWWW Cr UK W. WM= 11111A UDE LPL IN IKE WrotT/OW. warms mot We. L-1--051113!1.12. Weal N,ANNAN ..mm. 0 mmarz .. ® mra..oa..wm. m.. +T� MCI ME LLCM. SS - - LISSIES OM No an= MOM IRE • • , RECELV,EP- MAXI,O 47006 • Me B19LMo wLw¢YUrt AKAPP4APPC PLAN (suAr.c5 5 -00) TnIQx °MACE *= LIIVNCDIIXf LAPRE um SASISOSCAPE PLAN WIRINGS n —no) As s TYPICAL PAM LIRA TOPICAL Gwn ACCESS EBµRR]RIT SMUT NIB LAMOSCAPC PLAN ImBAIA6 p—p4) 15511 COMMIT PARK LISAMRYFNT u+em WO LRRWGPE PLAN TPIC MIS DU • • - 101 - • • • B LISTING POND Non Nom !I l�L C EXISTING WETLAND EXISTING WETLAND J1L Y7. N 1 eset to I. ADM ammo smstestst ara ma. FM Ism Wm. mas Mats Rm. ps 70. sot IMmtlits Immo.. MD RD MDR WO Min IN Rm. mom DO Ms ammo. WM ACE. L Mom Moss Ae Ricm wDAME.i. rr nB Rum OVOIMUJJ MOM Lama rani �. TR MD =mot sr IDES um MI. foR saw. 111 M sten. MDR 111 MIADATIDE St TROD MD MORD MAIL IC MAIM •■ ▪ Mos 44.1. IF MD. Atom M MI grim MDR DO Dis.dostr Mss SOM. DIEIrE poop pp, SCODINC INSTALLATION --4. 1 ISLAS tro MOM KO Ms el 17.11.12 111111 ANA. PRA ISCusgu mom A AMR RRU o.R 47 — 1RRIGATI0N NOTES: • mIDITED Mom 11.117 m Aae im anc Dm Mts. DI nom DR SUM OR ARM Dr 0.1011M7ED ist3. Dm. mato ix MP. RNANC • -- SODDING MAINTENANCE, mo▪ mmem Ross DRIED As Imam. so bums ADM. DMus M D037 s wigs .016 N arm zoo s Nan.. SEEDING REOOWIENOATI ONS: ---Oa 614111MV. Irt DIM 7.:D. .3 uto mum IDD Rom um ssam WID(.04 MDR. 1.21110 V'— CDNSERVAON NOT Ls mosso MT MOWS IFS MalssiON t Mirriasim Acc. Imo RE Del Lort pop.. pop 101111.1 1.11101. SMIMM 47111: 114. MDIMADS 11. NAM. MOAK snT 1. CIBIBIACTOR 117 Va. 1 FAWNS PRIOR 0 ANT D. UWOMO.0/4110,E CROW CONTRACTOR ENTIRELY M . 0.111 • SEANCE mlry n.m�Amt oAmSD ARCHITECT OR ES.4117.1 A7 CORMACTIR P D NtIm0.E MM. 4. maul. WIER WE C MOBIANBAL • ALN. LINES NE BI inL LATERAL w¢ ANAL . ALL ennvn PVC REEK 6 CONTRACT. BNALL WT D CAP. CETICTOP "B • CCNT CTBR BULL BAIO MIN � B NAM CORM • FABRICATE ALL PRE 101 SWARM TED POINDED F CUT IS. ALL VALVE B04S mC VALVE BOSS TDI N LO.ATE PLANT BED ARIAS 1.1 T lqx C WISOWIS oannwoi. MINE. 14 P. vV. 75 UNDER R PULL BDB6 WN LABEL CR IIm®m ®e ALPP OMB. PT ON B1 .:111.1.1.7 AwrsFNC RAOn CwTRDL ON AUTO.. MA 'LSE RE. ENS AT¢ TiCONTR.. SP. Bel le ONE OF CumlEnw Tv AN• 1nM BRNL BE 11.11.01 • ME r Am Bw AUTOMATIC REB01E 3/C MOOD GRAM. WWI OWNS S MOM POWEI B Smurn.. SEW. BO . FIIWK BATA KINK. . imumtas riltomen MIAs Anessnm 7.1x. 421 Jr. Res. APRUi Itomm Dm. RAD Ass EXISTING WETLAND 0-- ®— ..a.a1 sm. Ruutm -e BID. P.M .BI6 o—NAV.®... mem Nm....a.B... aCl maI m am • 7 I - 102- • • • SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 FRONT ELEVATION1 KAM moo. ® °6o,.,d SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 REAR ELEVATION D.. ®m.,a Al SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 SIDE E SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 SIDE E -103- • B2 C3 Al Hrx Ike Hsu an rs---1 SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 FRONT ELEVATION1 Al) B3 IICALL SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 REAR ELEVATION -104- SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 SIDE E SEVEN (7) UNR BUILDING 2 SIDE I • • • J.ESFAC`' TOUJNI 011E 4T WOODS El:x ENOS ALL MOT BF 106E p1E5SN15 Th. L•gaoy Nrnno -LL LLC, a MMsson 1.11. Lbbllty company, too moor el the W... auorlbea properly .111.0 4 In Me Gty el Line Lae. Slate of tenet,. County el Meta, 0 el[ Gubnt 0, T1@ VILLAGE N0. 3, Mellor County, Minnesota. Non cornea the done be be surveyed and platted as LEGACY 10WNNNIES AT WD005 EDGE me do hereby want. M M" pub. for ,0010 use for•wr the dnbw,e and u101ty ..nnmy Os noon on LAb ptL LEGACY 001.05CS -11. LLG Ind ,starer set. Legacy IShcnpe -LL LLC. a MMnnelo 1.11.0 IJObgly company, her mused Una prawn Us be Mena by Its proper a y of 20e- John C. Bran STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Ohl I Moo. Tlee w71r12" e M-LLmLLCt , m Mmnn KKm Mma�_ ewo f Me eempany. inn. Public, Camty, Morn0M MY Comminbn E..e 200_ by Jehn C Brent. thief menu. or i honY aerllfy Mal 1 hen eurvewd me plotted Me pmpoty eeemMee an W LEGACY TOVNNOMES AT 50005 EOM that ins plot M1 r nmeeere0tlm of eale1 weey; that MI *Mlanwe m mmny Moen . tM Wol m fnl me hmaneu. of u bet uat INI menumenb MI M mm•e0Y PM1On M Ma 9nand se sown: Not tae mM1Me lmdoy Ilow me ea oOOy aaYgntrtn an sale plot 0,14 Mel than .a nn vet Imre se 002.4 lo MMse01e S0M1.. Sac 505,0* 5uby I Or ,0100 010hwye b be bepsel•a NOer Mm se •,000. an •400 IML Eri R Bms"youa Lon Surveyor *mob Neg... No..123 STATE OF MINNESOTA GOWN OF SnIone.. Surveyorn C•NNa1e .m oelmmMdme bete . tw day at 200_ by Er0 R Nekmnue, Lan Naty PWM, County. MMm1e My 00,0,b10T1 E.ew 110 pbl of IFOACV TONNNOMES AT 10005 MN,E we eperwee by the ay Cem11 of aloe Lae., Mhulee 1. el a rani. me• r. thereof Ind Me County K15000, 01,00" 1,0,. Own 0.0.002 14 On CllMe er0tm w.nanM1 aM ncv 4 50 el Me Qmminbn" r innn.MOan 014 reeomm.04.Mn, OS PrwMn 0 " 5, .wormed >D day p"bd era reran rinem rseerot e1 701 emnumM1 by Mmm.ra slabs.. s.nw 5,403, son. z By By City Oar 1111 plot Ina been el an ono .7,1,0 0 W _ day of 200_ X20. Heim County Sum. RECEIVED JUL 1 8 2006 CITY OF UNO LAKES • DENOTES FOUND 0100 MONUMENT MARKED AS MANNED NI mnumenta ramped by IBmeeoto Statute. and net oho. • Mb plot 001 be set rMm one year of the 0..05 date of this plot. and rm11 be .44.0* by o 7/2 loch by 1B inch h en plP. marked by ALS 44125 For Ne VILLAGE N� 3. 4*024 002714, MM.ota. M emmadtto have THE a ..m9 of 500'03'45W. GRAPHIC SCALE mM .�olit / / 0 / / / P / / / OJ.4.• • es - '°lrmr""'"yk, DETal.L.T (m sire) N �BmB7 N1e';s.,�e ,nee i min - a1�Dp Ary, SIBS< N8733'45'W a of Ouhol 0. THE VILLAGE N0. 3 ¢br IOU 5 - 105 - Sine \CA0 \03proJ\031901.P\03170- FINAL - PLAT- STN.4Og 7/II /2006 1105,11 AN COT • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 6C Michael Grochala July 24, 2006 Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -121 Approving Joint Powers Agreement with Anoka County for the Improvements of CSAH 14 from I -35W to I -35E Simple Majority Anoka County in cooperation with Lino Lakes and Centerville is preparing to award contracts for the reconstruction of County State Aid Highway (CSAH 14) from I -35W to 1 -35E. The project includes the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of CSAH 14 and CSAH 54, and bituminous trail /concrete sidewalk along the entire length of the project. Construction of the project will begin in winter of 2006. The Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) set forth the responsibilities of the city and county as well as the cost sharing for the project. The total estimated construction cost of the project (excluding engineering and right -of -way acquisition) is $14,245,900. The City's total share of the project is estimated at $381,092.49. The City's share of project costs will be funded by a combination of Municipal State Aid Street and trunk utility funds. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the JPA with Anoka County. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 06 -121 2. Joint Powers Agreement • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 06 -121 RESOLUTION APPROVING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ANOKA COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 14 (I -35W TO I -35E) WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, authorizes political subdivisions to enter into Joint Powers Agreements, and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes and the County of Anoka agree that it is in the best interest of the traveling public to reconstruct County State Aid Highway No. 14 (Main Street) from I -35W to I -35E; and WHEREAS, the parties are mutually agreed that the reconstruction of County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street) including construction of a bituminous trail /concrete sidewalk, storm sewer system and other utilities should be done as soon as possible; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that the County shall cause the construction of County State Aid Highway 14(Main Street); and WHEREAS, the parties have an existing Memorandum of Understanding ( "MOU ") date November 29, 2005, regarding said project; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said project be shared. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. that the City Council hereby approves the Joint Powers Agreement with the County of Anoka for the reconstruction of County State Aid Highway No. 14 (Main Street) from I -35W to I -35E and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the JPA (Anoka County Contract No. 2006 -557) on behalf of the City. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Julianne Bartell, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of July, 2006. • • • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • Anoka County Contract No.2006 -0557 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 14 (MAIN STREET) FROM I -35W to I -35E (COUNTY PROJECT NO. 02- 614 -24) This Agreement made and entered into this day of , by and between the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 2100 Third Avenue North, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, hereinafter referred to as "County ", and the City of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Pkwy, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the parties of this agreement have long exhibited concern for the deteriorating condition and traffic capacity of County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street); and, WHEREAS, the parties of this agreement consider it mutually desirable to reconstruct County State Aid Highway No. 14 (Main Street) from I -35W to I -35E to improve the level of service and safety of the intersections included therein; and, WHEREAS, the parties are mutually agreed that the reconstruction of County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street) including construction of a bituminous trail /concrete sidewalk, storm sewer system and other utilities should be done as soon as possible; and, WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement consider it mutually desirable to construct a new permanent traffic control signal at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 54 (20th Avenue N) for the safety of the traveling public; and, WHEREAS, the County has received federal funds through the Surface Transportation Program to improve County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street); and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that the County shall cause the construction of County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street); and, WHEREAS, the Anoka County Highway Department has prepared plans and specifications for the improvements to County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street) under Project No. S.P. 02 -614- 13 which plans and specifications are on file in the office of the County Engineer; and, WHEREAS, the parties have an existing Memorandum of Understanding ( "MOU ") dated November 29, 2005, regarding said project; and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that any extra work performed beyond that shown in the plans as • bid shall be the responsibility of the requested party; and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said project be shared; and, - 1 0 9 - Anoka County Contract No.2006 -0557 • WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 471.59 authorizes political subdivisions of the State to enter into joint powers agreements for the joint exercise of powers common to each. • • NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY STIPULATED AND AGREED: I. PURPOSE The parties have joined together for the purpose of constructing the roadway, bituminous trail /concrete sidewalk, streetscape, drainage, traffic control system as well as other utilities on portions of County State Aid Highway No. 14 (Main Street) as described in the plans and specifications numbered S.P. 02- 614 -24 on file in the office of the Anoka County Highway Department (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Project ") II. METHOD The County shall provide all engineering services unless otherwise stated herein and shall cause the construction of the Project in conformance with said plans and specifications. The County shall do the calling for all bids and acceptance of all bid proposals. III. COSTS A. Construction The contract costs of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, normal engineering costs and equipment rental required to complete the work, shall constitute the actual "construction costs" and shall be so referred to herein. "Estimated" costs are good faith projections of the costs which will be incurred for the Project. Actual costs may vary and those will be the costs for which the relevant parties will be responsible. The estimated construction cost of the project (including County furnished materials) is $14,245,856.10. Federal funds available for the Project are capped at $6,523,550.00. The federal funds shall be split based on the ratio of eligible cost incurred by each party to the total eligible project cost. Eligible costs are the costs of items that can participate in federal funding as shown on Exhibit A. Lino Lakes participation in the construction costs, for improvement in Lino Lakes, is as follows: 1. The City shall provide construction observation for the relocation and reconstruction of their utilities and approve for acceptance the work as it is completed. 2. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the hydrant and curb box relocation and gate box adjustment as well as water and sewer relocation and construction. The estimated City cost of these items is $15,800.00. 3. The City shall furnish and deliver to the construction site replacement hydrants for any hydrants, which are being relocated as a part of this project, which they want replaced. • Anoka County Contract No.2006 -0557 4. The City shall provide construction observation for the relocation and reconstruction of their utilities and approve for acceptance the work as it is completed. 4a. The City shall be responsible for any deficiencies associated with the relocation and reconstruction of the utilities that arise during or after the completion of the Project. 5. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) for the non - participating and non - eligible portion of the storm sewer construction plus a percentage of the eligible portion of stoini sewer construction. Storm sewer construction includes pipes, aprons, trash guards, catch basins, manholes, castings, rip rap, inlet protection, detention basins (including ponds and their outlet structures and grit chambers and /or collectors), and a portion of mobilization. The non - eligible and eligible portions are defined in the State Hydraulics letter. 5a The estimated cost of the non - participating storm sewer is $0.00 of which the estimated cost to the City is $ 0.00 (100 %). 5b. The cost of the eligible portion will be split between the City and County based on the ratio of contributing flow determined by the product of contributing area and runoff coefficient. The estimated percentage of contributing flow from the City is seven percent (7 %). The total eligible estimated cost of the storm sewer is $1,439,844.00 of which the estimated cost to the City is $100,789.08. 5c. The total non - eligible estimated cost of the storm sewer is $0.00 of which the estimated cost to the City is $0.00 (100 %). 6. The City shall pay fifty percent (50 %) of the cost of concrete curb and gutter (less median curb and gutter) in Lino Lakes. The estimated total cost of curb and gutter including medians is $281,114.00, of which the City's estimated cost is $3,933.00. 7. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of decorative median above the cost of concrete median. The City's estimated cost for decorative median is $0.00. 8. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of streetscape items including but not limited to: median plantings, trees, tree grates, street lights, stamped concrete and other aesthetic treatments the City chooses to include with the Project. The streetscape items shall be designed by a licensed landscape architect and meet the Anoka County Highway Department Landscape /Streetscape Guidelines. The City's estimated cost for streetscape items is $0.00. 9. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of new concrete and /or bituminous driveway pavement for all upgraded driveways. The City's estimated cost for driveway pavement is $0.00. • 10. Any in place driveway pavement disrupted by the construction will be replaced in -kind by the County at no cost to the City. • Anoka County Contract No.2006 -0557 11. The City shall pay for one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of new sidewalk installed on the project including pedestrian curb ramps with truncated domes. The City's estimated cost for new sidewalk is $0.00. City. 12. In place concrete walk will be replaced by the County at no cost to the 13. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of new bituminous trails. This cost includes pavement, aggregate base, soil correction (including lightweight fill and geotextile fabric if applicable) and additional embankment work necessary to construct the trail as well as any retaining walls and fences that are required due to the trail that would not be required without the trail. The City's estimated cost for the trail is $455,496.00. This does not include the non - participating trail cost of $25,122.00 near the CSAH 14 /Rice Creek Bridge. In lieu of paying this cost the City shall contribute the matching amount to the cost of the Bridge construction. 14. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of any street lighting included in the project. The design and installation of ornamental streetlights shall be in accordance with the County's specifications. The City's estimated cost for street lighting is $ 0.00. 15. The City shall pay zero percent (0 %) of the cost of construction and installation of the whole traffic actuated signal system at CSAH 54 (including County supplied materials). 16. The County shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of all interconnect costs. 17. The City shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption (EVP) costs. The City's estimated cost for EVP is $0.00. 18. The City shall pay their share of mobilization and field office as determined by Mn/DOT. The City's estimated cost of these items is $21,450.00 19. The City shall pay their share of traffic control as determined by Mn/DOT. The City's estimated cost of these items is $2,850.00 20. The City shall pay an estimated $25,122.00 toward the cost of the CSAH 14 /Rice Creek Bridge in lieu of paying the non- participating trail cost. 21. The total estimated construction cost to the City for the project is summarized below: 1 Construction and Adjustment of Local Utilities 2 Grading, Base and Bituminous 3 Storm Sewer 4 Detention Basins (included in Storm Sewer) 5 Concrete Curb & Gutter 6 Decorative Medians $15,800.00 $0.00 $100,789.08 $0.00 $3,933.00 $0.00 • Anoka County Contract No.2006 -0557 7 Streetscape Features $0.00 8 Driveways $0.00 9 Concrete Sidewalk $0.00 10 Trails $455,496.00 11 Street Lights $0.00 12 Traffic Signals $0.00 13 EVP $0.00 14 Mobilization, Field Office $21,450.00 15 Traffic Control $2,850.00 16 Bridge $25,122.00 Total Estimated Share of Construction Cost To The $625,440.08 City Estimated Federal Funds available to the City $294,382.80 Total Cost less Federal Funds $331,057.28 Total Construction Cost to City $331,057.28 The total estimated construction cost to the City (less Federal Funds) for the project is $ 331,057.28 as shown on the attached Exhibits A and B. The City participation in construction engineering will be at a rate of eight percent (8 %) of their designated share. The estimated cost to the City for construction engineering is $50,035.21. The grand total estimated construction cost to the City for the Project is $ $381,092.49. Upon award of the contract, the City shall pay to the County, upon written demand by the County, ninety five percent (95 %) of its portion of the cost of the project estimated at $ $362,037.86. The City's share of the construction cost of the project shall include only construction and construction engineering expense and does not include administrative expenses incurred by the County. Upon final completion of the project, the City's share of the construction cost will be based upon actual construction costs. If necessary, adjustments to the initial ninety five percent (95 %) charged will be made in the form of credit or additional charges to the City's share, Also, the remaining five percent (5 %) of the City's portion of the construction costs shall be paid. IV. TERM This Agreement shall continue until terminated as provided hereinafter. V. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be disbursed by each entity pursuant to the method provided by law. VI. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES All contracts let and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by the County in conformance to the State laws. -113- Anoka County Contract No.2006 -0557 VII. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and disbursements shall be made upon request by either party. VIII. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, with or without cause, upon not less than thirty (30) days written notice delivered by mail or in person to the other party. If notice is delivered by mail, it shall be deemed to be received two (2) days after mailing. Such termination shall not be effective with respect to any solicitation of bids or any purchases of services or goods which occurred prior to such notice of termination. The City shall pay its pro rata share of costs which the County incurred prior to such notice of termination. IX. MAINTENANCE 1. Maintenance of the completed watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer (except catch basins and catch basin leads), detention basins (including ponds and their outlet structures and any grit chambers and /or collectors) shall be the sole obligation of the City. 2. Maintenance of all trails and sidewalks, including snow plowing, shall be the sole responsibility of the City. 3. Maintenance of streetlights and cost of electrical power to the streetlights shall be the sole obligation of the City. 4. The City shall be responsible to maintain all streetscape features installed with the Project. Maintenance shall be performed in accordance with the "Anoka County Highway Department landscape /Streetscape Guidelines dated June 2000." X. NOTICE For purposes of delivery of any notices hereunder, the notice shall be effective if delivered to the County Administrator of Anoka County 2100 Third Avenue North, Anoka, Minnesota 55303, on behalf of the County, and the City of Centerville, 1880 Main Street, Centerville, MN 55449, on behalf of the City XI. INDEMNIFICATION The City and the County mutually agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of the respective officers, agents, or employees relating to activities conducted by either party under this Agreement. XII. ENTIRE AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect between the -114- • • • Anoka County Contract No.2006 -0557 parties to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations, or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties. Anoka County Contract No.2006 -0557 410 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below. COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF LINO LAKES By: By: Margaret Langfeld, Chair John Bergeson Anoka County Board of Commissioners City of Lino Lakes Mayor Dated: Dated: ATTEST Bv: By: John "Jay" McLinden Gordon Heitke Anoka County Administrator City of Lino Lakes Administrator • Dated: Dated: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: By: Douglas W. Fischer, P.E. Michael Grochala Anoka County Engineer Community Development Director Dated: Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: By: Dan Klint Assistant Anoka County Attorney City Attorney Dated: Dated: • • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT DRAFT CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES JUNE 26, 2006 : June 26, 2006 : 5:40 p.m. , 6:25 p.m. : Councilmember Carlson, Reinert and Acting Mayor O'Donnell : Stoltz and Mayor Bergeson Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Finance Director, Al Rolek; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; Economic Development Coordinator, Mary Alice Divine; Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia; and City Clerk, Julianne Bartell BLUE HERON DAYS CONTRIBUTIONS, AL ROLEK Finance Director Rolek stated at the last work session Council asked for a list of in -kind contributions made by the City toward the Blue Heron Days Celebration, the value of the contributions, and the possibility of a cash contribution. A survey of Directors yielded these results: Preparation for the Parade (barricade drop off/pickup) Preparation and use of ball fields for tournament Additional cleanings of Satellite toilets Police — Officers Supervisors Reserves (Value of time) Total In —Kind Contributions $ 120 600 250 492 980 ,818 $3,259 Finance Director Rolek advised if the City were to supply umpires for the softball tournament, as suggested, the cost would be $1,000 — 2,000, depending on the number of games played. This amount is unbudgeted and would impact City programming unless a budget adjustment is made. If Council would like to supply umpires or any other cash - out-of pocket contribution, it has been suggested that since attendance to the LMC conference and other training is less than expected, there should be excess funding in the Council Conferences line item that may be used for this purpose, estimated at $1,000 to $1,500. It was the consensus of the Council to move forward with the in -kind services in the amount of $3,259. The Council will discuss further contributions for next year during the budget process. Council also directed staff to inform the Blue Heron Days Committee regarding the dollar amount of the in -kind services. -117- -I Formatted: Centered I Deleted: • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 26, 2006 DRAFT Formatted: Centered 46 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 47 48 Item 3A, Blue Heron Days Update — this item was removed from the regular Council 49 agenda and rescheduled for July 10, 2006. 50 51 MINNESOTA PIPELINE COMPANY MINNCAN PROJECT PROPOSED 52 ROUTE, GORDON HEITKE 53 54 City Administrator Heitke advised in January 2006, Minnesota Pipe Line (MLP) filed two 55 applications with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to expand the crude 56 oil transportation capacity of its Minnesota Pipe Line System. MPL submitted a 57 Certificate of Need Application because the existing pipeline system is at its maximum 58 capacity. A proposed new pipeline will provide the region with greater capacity and 59 flexibility to meet the expanding demand for gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, asphalt, and other 60 petroleum products. 61 62 City Administrator Heitke stated the routing permit approval process includes a public 63 comment period including an opportunity for parties to file an altemative route with the 64 Minnesota Department of Commerce (DOC) for the commission's consideration. A party 65 other than MPL has filed for consideration of an alternative route. MPL strongly 66 contends the alternative proposed does not meet the route selection criteria of Minnesota 67 rules to minimize human and environmental impact. 68 69 City Administrator Heitke stated the Department of Commerce staff is tentatively 70 scheduled to present this route alternative to the PUC for consideration on June 29, 2006. 71 The PUC will determine whether it will accept this alternative for further review by the 72 DOC staff. MPL is encouraging letters, which would support their preferred route at this 73 time, in hopes that there is a decision to not further consider the existing route through 74 Anoka County, including Lino Lakes. 75 76 Council directed staff to draft a letter indicating the City of Lino Lakes does have 77 concerns over impacts within the City if the pipeline follows the existing route through 78 Lino Lakes. 79 80 The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. 81 82 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 83 July 10, 2006. 84 85 86 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor 87 88 Transcribed by: 89 Kim Points 90 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 2 -118- • • • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 10, 2006 DRAFT 1 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES 3 MINUTES 4 5 DATE : July 10, 2006 6 TIME STARTED : 5:35 p.m. 7 TIME ENDED : 6:40 p.m. 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember O'Donnell, Reinert, Stoltz 9 and Mayor Bergeson 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : Carlson 11 12 13 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; City Planner, Jeff Smyser 14 (part); Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia; and Community Development Director, Michael 15 Grochala (part) 16 17 18 2007 BUDGET REQUEST FOR ANOKA COUNTY SESQUICENTENNIAL 19 CELEBRATION, MARY CAPRA 20 21 Ms. Mary Capra, representative of the Anoka County Sesquicentennial Celebration, came 22 forward and stated the County is asking each community for a donation for the 23 celebration. The County is requesting a $1,000 donation from the City of Lino Lakes. 24 25 Ms. Capra stated the donation would help fund the wagon trail event. She also 26 encouraged the City to apply to be one of the firework sites for the event. She distributed 27 information about the event and asked that the Council consider the request during their 28 2007 budget process. 29 30 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY DRIVE THROUGH 31 FACILITY AND RESTAURANT OUTDOOR DINING FACILITIES, MILLERS 32 CROSSROADS SHOPPING CENTER, JEFF SMYSER 33 34 City Planner Smyser advised at the June 12 meeting, the City Council tabled the 35 application for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a drive through facility and outdoor 36 seating, both proposed for a coffee shop. Discussion centered on the drive through 37 facility. 38 39 City Planner Smyser stated the applicant has submitted a sketch showing a revised layout 40 for the site. The new layout eliminates the additional driveway and redirects the drive 41 through traffic around the building. This avoids creating a new driveway offset from the 42 intersection of the two public streets. 43 44 City Planner Smyser advised the applicant offered to include a deed restriction that would 45 limit use of the drive through to a coffee shop. This would prevent other future uses such 46 as a fast food restaurant from using the drive up window if the coffee shop leaves. The Formatted: Centered CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 10, 2006 DRAFT 1 City Attorney suggests an alternative of simply adding a condition of approvals the CU P_ 2 that would create this limitation. The conditional also could limit the size of the coffee 3 shop. 4 5 City Planner Smyser noted at the June 12, meeting the Council tabled the application 6 upon agreement from the applicant to extend the review period for 60 days. This 7 extension expires August 16, which means the Council must act either July 24 or August 8 14. 9 10 Mr. Peter Hiliger came forward and reviewed the revised layout site and asked for 11 direction from the Council. He noted the developer is agreeable to additional screening 12 on the site. 13 14 The Council requested an opinion from the City Attorney regarding CUP requirements 15 and adding conditions of approval. 16 17 This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, July 24, 2006, 6:30 p.m. 18 19 2007 BUDGET PREPARATION PROCESS AND TIMELINE, GORDON HEITKE 20 21 City Administrator Heitke reviewed the proposed process and timeline for the preparation 22 of the 2007 budget. He outlined the process noting budget worksheets have been 23 distributed to all Directors for their respective departments. Directors will submit their 24 budget requests to the Finance Directory by July 20. The City Administrator and the 25 Finance Director will then review the requests with the directors and formulate a 26 proposed budget. At the July 24 Council work session the City Council will be asked to 27 set its parameters for the 2007 budget. The proposed budget will be completed, 28 distributed to the Council and reviewed at the budget work session proposed for Monday, 29 August 21. The review will be conducted by the Finance Director and City 30 Administrator, with the Directors in attendance to respond to questions. 31 32 The Council requested information on property valuation adjustments and the impact of 33 those adjustments on revenue. 34 35 The Council directed staff to schedule a preliminary budget meeting Monday, July 24, 36 2006 at 5:00 p.m. 37 38 City Administrator Heitke advised staff would also compile a list of special funding 39 requests and forward that to the Council prior to the preliminary budget meeting. Staff 40 asked Council to confirm the August 21 and September 6 budget work sessions. 41 42 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 43 44 There were no changes to the regular Council agenda. 45 46 The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. 2 t Formatted: Centered • Deleted: fro CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 10, 2006 DRAFT 4 - t Formatted: Centered 1 2 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on 3 July 24, 2006. 4 5 6 7 8 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor 9 10 11 Transcribed by: 12 Kim Points 13 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 14 • 3 • - 1 2 1 - • Formatted: Font: 14 pt COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 10, 2006 DRAFT • Formatted: Centered CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES DATE : July 10, 2006 TIME STARTED : 6:41 p.m. TIME ENDED : 6:55 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember O'Donnell, Reinert, Stoltz and Mayor Bergeson MEMBERS ABSENT : Carlson Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; City Attomey, Bill Hawkins; Community Development Director, Michael Grochala; Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia (part); and City Clerk, Julianne Bartell OPEN MIKE No one was present for open mike. SETTING THE AGENDA Item 8A, Consider Approval of June 26, 2006 Council Work Session Minutes was removed from the agenda. The agenda was approved as amended. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Stoltz moved to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. ITEM Consideration of Expenditures: ACTION July 10, 2006 (Check No. 77014 — 77155, $873.859.82) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 15236 — 15251, $4,721.36) Approval of June 13, 2006, Council Work Session Minutes (Financial Retreat) • 1 Approved Approved Approved -123- • • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 10, 2006 DRAFT Resolution No. 06 -110, Authorizing the Issuance of A Peddler /Transient Merchant License to Ryan and Carrie Christensen, Promoting and Selling Home Security Systems, Firstline Resolution No. 06 -113, Authorizing Issuance of A Peddler /Transient Merchant License to T.A.P. Enterprises for a Tool and General Merchandise Sale at VFW Post Resolution No. 06 -99, Application for Temporary 3.2 Beer License, Cabaret License and Exemption for Gambling Permit, St. Joseph's Catholic Church Festival, August 12 & 13, 2006 Approved Approved Approved Resolution No. 06 -111, Approving Classification Of Tax Forfeiture Property and Notice to Obtain Property Approved Consider Not Waiving Monetary Limits on Tort Liability per Minnesota Statues, Section 466.04 Approved FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK There was no report from the Finance Department. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -115, Approving a Revised Proposal and Authorizing Execution of a Contract with Neu & Company for the Community Visioning Project, Gordon Heitke — City Administrator Heitke stated at a work session on June 5, 2006 the Council reviewed a proposal to undertake the visioning process and directed staff to move forward and to negotiate a contract with Neu & Company based on the community approach of that proposal. The Council added a requirement that the cost of the project be capped at $30,000. City Administrator Heitke advised Neu & Company has submitted a Revised Proposal for a Community Visioning Project. The revised proposal includes a cap of $30,000 on payments to Neu & Company. I Formatted: Centered Council Member Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 06 -115, as presented. Council Member Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Blue Heron Days Update — Ms. Lynn Bergman, Blue Heron Days Committee Member, came forward and stated Chad Wagner from Miller's on Main will be present in a few weeks to provide the Council with an overall update on the festival. 2 - 124 - COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 10, 2006 DRAFT Ms. Bergman provided an update to the Council on recent and future activities of the Lino Lakes Royalty and Ambassador Program. She noted the parade with the Lino Lakes Royalty would take place on August 20, 2006. Ms. Amber Horton, current Lino Lakes Ambassador, came forward and noted her recent and upcoming events that she is participating in. She thanked the Council for supporting Blue Heron Days and presented them with a "First Place" royalty float trophy won at the St. Francis Pioneer Days celebtation, PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA Authorize the Police Department to Expend $12,698 in Drug Forfeiture Funds to Provide for an Upgrade to the Department Security Camera System — Chief Pecchia stated the City of Lino Lakes receives DWI and drug forfeiture funds from time to time. Based on the State Law and the Department's Policies and Procedures these funds must be expended for law enforcement purposes. The Department is proceeding with the upgrade of the current video security system within the Police Department. Chief Pecchia stated staff is requesting that the Council approve the purchase of the video security system and software utilizing $12,698 from the Drug Forfeiture fund. Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve the purchase of the video security system and software in the amount of $12,698 from the Drug Forfeiture fund, as presented. Council Member Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER There was no report from the Public Service Department. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA There was no report from the Community Development Department. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no Unfinished Business. NEW BUSINESS Consider Approval of June 26, 2006 City Council Meeting Minutes (Mayor Bergeson was absent) — Council Member Stoltz moved to approve the June 26, 2006 City Council Meeting Minutes, as presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried with Mayor Bergeson abstaining. 3 • -125- - I Formatted: Centered - 1 Deleted: their first trophy for the event COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 10, 2006 DRAFT COMMUNITY CALENDAR July 11, 2006 THROUGH JULY 24,2006: Planning and Zoning Board Meeting, Wednesday, July 12, 2006, 6:30 p.m. ADJOURN There being no further business, Council Member O'Donnell to adjourn at 6:55 p.m. Council Member Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, July 24, 2006. Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor Transcribed by: Kim Points TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • • 4 -126- ( Formatted: Centered 0 V y. 9 r , /'�, / s' • EXISTING I/ POND 4 /,l /'' NIA&890.00 (, I // / �/ HWLRB23D / // 40, �,Y 1 � 1' 1O AUGN WIN EA15WNO 0N® WET OXS SHALL ME FXISING PAVURMT (TYP.) EXTEND PAVEMENT 7 WHOM EVENT EJISIWC ORB &MAIM MAA900 04015 AS SPEWED. imam Y MNAN CLEARANCE ON ACCESSIBLE SEE OF EACH NAT (TIP.) EL0LTMCAL•EMODSL E A5 PA N/ 4 EXISTING WETLAND .111, 8812 CRIB RIO 0151111 (T7.) eO EXISTING WETLAND 1 BRWWINO6 PAVEIEMT (TIP SING CONCRETE APRON LAST CF WALK SHAD .BET WALK (TV. NEGATION AND ELECTRICAL l' .1111.1 DO CONCRETE PAID WITS AS SPECIFIED MANTMI T MINIMUM CLEARANCE ON ACO259131E SIDE OF EACH UNIT (TIP.) LAYOUT AND PAVING NOTES: -- D. 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE WTI CITY ORDINANCE. 2. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES ROADWAY PAW: NETTS, CURBS A® CUTTERS, BOLLARDS AND WALLS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED N THE FOLD PRIOR 10 INSTALLATION FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHTECT. 1 DECORATIVE PAVER LINTS AND LAYOUT SNAIL BE STARED N THE FIELD FOR REVEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUMO COLORS MO MATERIALS KR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. A. DIMEl00NS SHOWN ARE ID FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION 6 BUILDINGS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAVANGS 5. CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST ELECTROWC PLE UNFOIMATON FOR ACCURACY OF INSTALLATION AT THE DESCRETON OF THE OWNER 6. PARKING STALLS SHALL BE STRIPED IN114 A C WOE WRTE PANTED NNE. ACCESSIBLE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE PANTED MTH A C TIRE WHITE PAINTED LINE; 1B' ON - CENTER AND AT 45 ANGLE TO THE STALL.. STOP LIES SHALL BE 17 NOE WHITE PANTED LIRE 7. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS SHALL COORDINATE W11H THE EXISTING BENCHMARK AS NOCATID ON THE SINVEY/OXIS1ING CONDITIONS DRAWING N 14,5' VI.LNDE DEVE ECWICAL0 AS SPURTED. 81AM05 PAVEMENT SHALL MEET MIND PAVEMENT (TIP.) TAPER NEW CAB 10 ALIGN WIN FASTING CEM OEOWIIE ONAIBNTAL (' HEYCL1 I0S1 - 9 WE 55 WADI SIGN SCHEDULE STOP SRN (R1 -1) ® VAN ACCE55BLE PARKING 17KIC (1.35) © VAN ACCESS 1.5 PARKING lrxlr (R7 -8A) MOUNT BELOW SIGN B STOOP HEIGHT SCHEDULE 1 C6.2 ARESSBIE CURB CONCRETE WALE (i RETAINING WALL NTH ORN AL CEIOETE WALL! s BITUMINOUS WAIX Y 6 molar VAUDY CUTTER (Tr. APPROXO1A1a0 80 LF. MANTENANCE ROM MT IF 81198905 IINJL COORDINATE LOCATION NTH 1140 1171 (IYP.r APPROIIMATELnr D4 • 'i 19, l v LAM OF BNRBANLE j ••_ ••�_ 401 or Osiftmez I EXISTING i1, 1/ POND 3 . HWL 889.70 tAa S�wci ® 1 RISER ■6' GRADE CHANGE ® 6 RBER■36' GRADE CHANCE NOTE SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL NFORMATON OR ADDITIONAL 511E STARS LEGEND: mill BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREA _1. Imo C7 CONCRETE WALK DECORATIVE PAVEMENT YAWN PATIO AREAS PROPOSED UGH-MG -SE UGH1NG PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROPOSED BENCH-SEE PLANS FOR DIFFERENT TYPES PROPOSED ELECTRICAL AND IRRIGATION ENCLOSURE m PROPOSED MALBOL UNITS • — LIMIT DF DISTURBANCE PUTTED PROPERTY UNE CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER - - - -- 15 BUILDING SETBACK FROM PROPERTY LIRE -e--- ORNAMENTAL FENCE OR RAE PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGACY TOWN HOMES OUILOT B. AND 0T11DT D THE LEGACY OF WOODS EDGE LIND LA1= MINNESOTA INNLDWIGII9 4 7 MIT TOWN HOME BUILDING TYPE A OR TYPE LEFT OR RIGHT LEFT OR RIGHT ON BUXOM 0EN1FTCATON NOTE RELATES TO THE LOCATION OF THE MECHANICAL ROLL LOCATION VARIES PER BAILING VERIFY AND COORDINATE WTI{ ARCHITECT. ENONEER. AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSRRUC1CN. SEE UTILITY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS EXISTING WETLAND 20 0 .0 RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNER HARTFORD I EGRDUP A e we I WC MT MEE= I Imp AM 114 Me M, igNSAAW ▪ NINA www1 N IN NM Ns Ind N. M., NR Ill I rt.. W4 LAS RAM.. NAM ANT IN d d IN OW lMSlt INN Los IN NM CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC IMO WEIS HMO RAM 11.0113 MUM SOWN L nap 19E0 10)-2401 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE 81x0 LANES HINN ®TA ISSUE: 1x/15/08 PION. SOT RAN 1/10/06 GOT 11 11111. 4/5/08 CRY COMMIE 5/5/06 CAP' SDWIWRAL 5/5/06 MO SET REV. THIS SHEET O NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE SITE LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NUMBER C2.0 ® OTYAIMrt mos. mamma CROUP AE INC Y00NNiTADATNNI MN.ENP REEL MAY,, 0 4;7006, LAKES NOM 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL AIIMUIC PAT0 LAmDI AND I AN LAYOUT PER MT AS SHOWN a THE DRAWINGS i LOCATION O STOOP AND STANS, ORNAMENTAL ITNTL AND EXTERIOR STAIRS SHALL BE STAKED N DE IEID AND • RENEWED BY THE IAN0CAPE AR01100T PRIOR 'TO INSTALLATION. ONAYENTAL FENCE (TIP. 000 _ ENTIRE LENCO Q SUMMAND) GARAGE ACO =CRETE PAD TOR MECHANICAL NO 0111.15 CORRECTIONS COORONAIE WIN ARCHITECTURE (IP. PER•MT) GARAGE ACCESS TYPICAL TOWN HOME BUILDING 81 -#14 (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) GARAGE ACCESS GARAGE ACCESS GMAQ mass EXECRATIVE PAIEMENT t� PATIO 6NN SOLDu' . COURSE BORDER (TO..) -STAB AND SNOOPS PER MT j SEE AR010ECTURAL DRAMN0 (IP.) J; 1 LECA71EIf DF FDITIIRE SHALL HE COOOINATED RAWtl� _ e OARED PER "Au, AMY 9E 1. 1, • ITwI 00TH ME 015 MAY COMO !8L_ LO A1101RIFTI%MlE_�.. -- - -71.0. t� 1106.. SHAU. BE 0110 12100 i POOMR'A6 -°`I,- •°. wyL 01FN}:11" T— --- r_• ... SRC7tm.coutoNAE -. �. DiA L LION w THE . ULIOSGA±[.A110RTECI' --.. TYPICAL BUILDING ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT PLAN (BUILDINGS in—pc) 0 TAO LANDSCAPE: 11461-501,17111131 SOL 9111-N01). RIME 9Tl2S 6 9L SIAM 6 KBD. SINES 61L SINE PALO LAYOUT: • TAOR LANDSCAPE. O 9< 56118E 6 NEB. ROM a LC SWANS 1 MCA. ONAE0701 NEM LA osowE 9198 S LAIN 12.00!: ANTRA LANDSCAPE 16 SN 9WIe 6 NEE. !NW Lc SHIRRS SUMP 016AIa14 REM IAIQ4JPE 1 91 9066 90 YARD LANDSCAPE EAST -SOUTH EAST $: SHADE -NOD. 9040 SPEIX0 It SE 9006 11 Mm. 501686 6 LL WEB TOP TYPICAL BUILDING ENLARGEMENT LANDSCAPING PLAN (BUILDINGS /1 -/10) TYPICAL GARAGE ACCESS ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN (BUILDINGS (1 -#10) 5 2.5 0 5 OPEN TURF AREA POTENTIAL FOR WINTER ICE SKATING (MAINTAINED BY THE ASSOCIATION) TYPICAL GARAGE ACCESS DILARGEMENT LAYOUT COMMUNITY PARK ENLARGMENT LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN I-- 10' O TYPICAL PATIO ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT PLAN (BUILDINGS gI -/14) 5' 2.5 0 5 s A. B STOOP TOOP�.7Li� 'X LANJ A • s�5 STARS r 1 .I•r � !+ � . .__.l_ SEC • ;� I STAIRS __ _ __. __._ . , _ .• ........... ....... ... ........... ���n E_� , gm J NNA` X 111, ,f, 01, J1I 6 % /LIP ,I-, I>E ARLA iIAN LANDSCAPE AREA ►5 .,.. . B /004 1213.618¢ fCMOEE WALK. TRADE AND LIMITS SHALL MATCI / /D COMTIVE PAVELIEIENi�._..._ E1M®I f0E 6 •BIQ"� USING WALK ( i wM $0➢072 COURSE BOOIX (iP.) ORNAMENTAL TIMM _ tDQ w wAlx ll. Ma -- • TYPICAL PATIO ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT PLAN (BUILDINGS gI -/14) 5' 2.5 0 5 TYPICAL UNIT ENLARGEMENT LANDSCAPE PLAN (BUILDINGS g1 -/14) 1 5' 2S® FOR BIDDING ONLY Li P1T =nr, N^A \Ie-r i IP+TRA►I ARCHTTECT/ENGDNEER PLANNER HARTFORD Itf =ol:P_ Ai ZINC:.= . 'aw•w =My ..PDMIA•DM w P•otivM+I+ •v •••••ilo •I Y A • • •y -'I w—P NO*. dew 114 rrrrU.r. ._. PrAA l 5•.•. -_ .. CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC. LICOVOIISINICENNII /9110 .111.11.2,4115(11114 41.1.011470N, ow 55431 g PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 12/2B/OS PRIM. SITE RAM 2/10/06 CITY 4W0A. 4 /5 /OR COT COMMENTS 5/5/06 an SUBMITTAL 5/5/06 ND SET 0 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGEMENT PLANS SHEET NUMBER: C2_1 s A. B STOOP TOOP�.7Li� pringrigi �' "._ -•ski � !+ � �i ` SODctt11B . STOOP •� i^ Y �1 ` to :e 2 �s•/ NNA` X 111, ,f, 01, J1I 6 % /LIP = �46lci4 I A iIAN TYPICAL UNIT ENLARGEMENT LANDSCAPE PLAN (BUILDINGS g1 -/14) 1 5' 2S® FOR BIDDING ONLY Li P1T =nr, N^A \Ie-r i IP+TRA►I ARCHTTECT/ENGDNEER PLANNER HARTFORD Itf =ol:P_ Ai ZINC:.= . 'aw•w =My ..PDMIA•DM w P•otivM+I+ •v •••••ilo •I Y A • • •y -'I w—P NO*. dew 114 rrrrU.r. ._. PrAA l 5•.•. -_ .. CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC. LICOVOIISINICENNII /9110 .111.11.2,4115(11114 41.1.011470N, ow 55431 g PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 12/2B/OS PRIM. SITE RAM 2/10/06 CITY 4W0A. 4 /5 /OR COT COMMENTS 5/5/06 an SUBMITTAL 5/5/06 ND SET 0 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGEMENT PLANS SHEET NUMBER: C2_1 f���/ '' \ \.\ ~ jl Is 4,- % / -J \ /may 1 I �. ) \� �/% /�� 7J ▪ � \ � \ • / ..-▪ --• \ \ 8.01 SA NONE SID MX AS 9'EC&lm BY THE 07• STAB ALONG IETLA0. SPACE S' MART � / r / 7.11 toe } ,TIC EXISTING WETLAND BLANKET (TIP.) 81' EXISTING WETLAND U DOME ROW OF SEDIMENT 5110 FENCE 511— ALONG WETLAND SPACE 5 APART FIRMED DOSING WALK 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RE9'ONSOLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STOICS THROUGHOUT TfIE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FlEED CHECK OF FNISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE DIUNEER/L.ANOSCAPE ARCHITECT BOOR 70 LOANING AND SODDING AC DATIES 2 UN5UITABIE MESS FILL MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED. SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR CPT—SITE- S SUITABLE MESS F51 MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED N A MANNER AND LOCATION AS APPROVED BY 1145 DIONEERAIN2SCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE UNIT OF WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE N A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGNEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOWSINE FIM91ED GRADE ELEVATORS. 6. LONGITUDINAL SLOPES OF WATIS SHALL BE 5X (MAX) AND 15 (MIN.) AND 2K (MAX) CROSS 9.OPE EXCEPT AS SHOW ON TIE DRAWINGS 7. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 4:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERM9. ON THE DRAWINGS SLOPES GREATER THAN 4:1 SHALL REQUIRE SURFACE ROUGHENING BY EITHER •STANSTEP• GRADING. GROOVING, FURROWING. OR TRACKING 10 AVOID RUNOFF VELO01Y AND RECEIVE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. SLOPES LESS THAN 4:1 NOT STABUZED WITH VEGETATION BULL HAVE 1145 SURFAQ ROUGH GRADED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY UNTIL 50D HAS BECOME STABLE AND MATURE AT NO 1M5 THROUGHOUT ENE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SHALL SLOPES BE A SMOOTH GRADE OR A COMPACTED SURFACE EROSION CONTROL NOTES: - 1. 114E CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS AS SHOW ON THE ORATNOS N ADDITION 15 OTHER MEASURES THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACONI1ES N ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDNANCE 2. 1145 CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. THIS MANIO1ANCE SHALL HNC LUOE CLEANING AND /OR REPLACING SYSTEMS THAT HAVE BECOME CLOGGED OR NO LONGER FUNCTIONAL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT MONTHLY AND AFTER EACH CONTROL MEASURES TD ENSURE AS SU TIE NECESSARY AU. OF 114E EVENT AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL B RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND SATISFACTORY DISPOSAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES UPON COMPLETION OF ALL MURK AND SOIL STABIUZA°.Oi4 AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 30 LF. OF SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR 1D THE OUT-ET OF EACH STOMA DRAIN PIPE TO CO7IROL AND MINIMIZE SEDIMENT RUNOFF. 7. SEDMIDCT FENCES SHALL BE CLEANED AT TIE OBSERVATION OF 114E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. C71Y. OR CONTRACTOR WHEN THE FENCE BECOMES 1/3 MAXIMUM FULL LEGEND: 410 420 + 422.0 EOF cam: 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 5 CONTOUR 0EVARON 81101Vµ SEDIMENT FENCE 9'OT GRADE ELEVATION EMERGENCY OVER FLOW AREA ON INTERIOR DRIVES UNITS OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NATIVE 5FEI) MIX AS SPECIFIED BY THE C:TY STABIUZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS STAIRWAY 101E5: 1. ALL STAIRWAYS AT BUILDING *IUA] TILL BE EITHER 1' OR 36• IN HEIGHT. DEPENDING ON SURROUFNDNG GRADE 2. ADDITIONAL STEPS MAY BE REWIRED AT THE CONNECTION TO SIDEWALKS. 3 FINAL STAIRWAY DEIERMINATONS SHALL BE STAKED N THE FIELD BY 1145 CONTRACTOR, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. AND 51RJECT 10 REVIEW AND APPROVAL 111' THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. RE-TAME NMI MN ONAI®ITAL RAIANG 'f \ .(i-1 mom WN1R0. 9ARRET (TIP.) NUPE SD MX AS SPECIFIED BY 11E CITY SOREM FENCE (TR.) EXISTING 1 WETLAND . / j A—,� ,; /, y =! MIN OTT MAUI AWN CF /DSTU)0BANO mAIGNl Nmf, wwrlamm0111.146, M...01 511 0!!W ... ROW ff SEDIMENT FAKE ALONG IETAND. SPACE 5 MAR NAIVE SEED Inc AS ZD 0 50 SPECIFIED BY ,02E Ott — — RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES HARTFORD IGROUP AYE WC1 FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I Ws* Sly Ft Y pia gdsYn w.IVw.1llIS � r,.� trio Ne N[i o e 0. Wood LEW,. /Mist ss r lerOW OAS 111 Ms1a Law - MWWar IL N.1 CONSULTANT: OWNER LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC. MO WELLS HAM NIA MOO MC. IMAM SgnX BLOOMINGTM. M. 162)O6Hm PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 11/n(0S PREM. WE NAM 3/+02/06 CRY SIANIT1u 4/3/51 OA CONVENTS 6/5/51 en' 91p1NTAL 5/1/51 W0 SET El REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C3.0 ��'' ` f 1_,x.0 '' '/'/ r ii o o rr ..L o or w r r r _ 1. ryy�r 1. 1. /11 i iy t r r ' _�� 11�11.� �\� ► �� - r r �� w w r r; \\ .1< .\, �/ " .. / r is -r--rT \. . r r r rl r Al. S. Y r, r Y r Y r I' r r, r r r Y r r r r r r 1 1 �I 1. w r Y 1. r j�r>��\ \ �lt� \. r r r 1 I Y r L. r r /ii � r �} �L � 7 _ t. I► 1 r Y Y Y/y �1. r/ j,u �` 1i , r L L}` ` \' .r r r 1\I II ALL r 1. r W"1. -' r Y ly./4 Y1. 6 Y. �� r. wt r 1. II / \1� r w \ t EXISTING 1C' t �{�lt'� 1? ^� i It 'WETLAND r A. r "r r w / /.w ,,�. r r `I, 1. 1 1171 Ls r II 1 r r r w w r y' r r � X4,4 . �^��a�•� ►. 1 . 'C.' -c , ICJ P ". 'Ifit.: +�I�A .,,^i r r r li. if IN. r Y 1R Wg . Is 4114/ L : i / ( ' i. . r `\ R�•N!7lv -4r♦111e i.:� / /III :I1 L :6�y� e amibil,"__„_. -.1%,.....„-- • r # i r 4 I r\ r Y t\ 1. r \�.'\ 1 EXISTING r WETL=\ND 1. I I1 LMlnnabe 5tl.sd.4. Prajet MI Pr./.t. LOW I Stalbol Ot7 12 15 11(1 TK Not. 5.. written .tsei0crat m for mars det.isd fietnrs Information. Description Limo DALS70- 10011P5 -SC83M -85(12 h4h to match Waal III) O Lune OMS50- 15014P5 -503W (14' MO-match .treat lIght) Lumens LLF 9500 0.800 1600D 0.80D Novak Summary Project All Projets Label CdeTps AN arso I Ma.N.mo. 8nit. A.0 Max Mn Fe 0.40 13.0 0.0 PROVIDE (4) LANDSCAPE 08011110 LIOH15. TRANSFORMERS. MRES STAIRS. AND APPORTANINC S PER UNIT AS SPEOF®. SEE ENLARGEMENT PLAN FOR EXACT LOCAMON. COORDINATE LOCATION 18M THE LANDSCAPE AR097ECT PRIOR TO 8STAL1A112111. f ( r . Y 1. r 4 r r1 r r r 1 r 'T, r �y r r L. Y w /V Y Is L Is rA� /fI IIIYYY ¢ ��,� /:,"1141\ „.,.../"---1 1 rt'�s'�,�R� del w r 4. , 111 ' - :ROA r r �`�i � , �I /., r r r r r r ep* �/1 ✓fir I. 1. r 6. I YY Y J.� � /7 - EXI S WETI r. 401 m® Mont Haight Project A9 Projects Se9N0 1404 2 7N 14 2 1K 14 3 11( 14 4 TK 14 5 18 14 6 1K 14 7 71( 14 TK 14 9 18 14 10 M 14 11 1K 14 12 10 14 13 14 14 M 14 15 18 14 16 710 12 17 1%1 12 18 11(1 12 19 M1 12 20 M1 12 21 11(1 12 22 181 12 23 M1 12 24 iK1 12 25 7K1 12 28 M1 12 27 1K1 12 LUMEC 014550- 16061PS- LYS45703C- 4435858 TYPE 11(- 14' Mount 100906. 1501P5 Lane TYPE 1K1- 12 Mount H498L 7011P5 Lunt RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNER HARTFORD GROUP A/E LNC.4 CONSULTANT: 1 Ma s�. s[ c m..ui, amr.Irwti OWNER LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC. MOINE. HMI.. Nor N.m5 A61v.E morn lO oaae PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE UNO LAIRS P0MJE10TA ISSUE: 12/28/56 MAIL 0610 PWI 6/10/06 COT 61191e66LL 4 /6/se CRr COMMIS 1/6/66 Or AMAMI 6/5/06 r 60 p REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THE SFEL-T SHEET TITLE: PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.2 COMMIT am wants., ovw NE, oeA NUECIIxolsomN.e. l( ,.r �`r 4--. 0 2 • EXISTING !POND 4 NWL 890.00 HWL 892.30 .ice EXISTING I WETLAND EXISTING WETLAND 1. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, EXCPT FOR NATIVE SPECIFED SEED AREAS. SHALL RECEIVE 4. OF LOAM TOP SOIL THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED INTO THE SUBSOIL AND SEEDED NR SODDED. AREAS M119N THE 59FLLI RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL RECEIVE LOAM AND 50D Wi1HN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. SEE SCD INSTALLATION 1401E5 BELOW. 2 SYMBOL OF TREES AND SHRUBS SHOYd1 OR TIE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENT FULL MATURITY 512E OF THE PLANT. COORDINATE LOCATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES. /JOTTING MXTURES. DOORS AND WINDOWS CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE N THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 1 18005 AND SHRUBS SHALL BE BAILED N BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP. 4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL REOSVE 4" LATER W 1 -1/2 DIAMETER GRAY ANGULAR TRAP STOW DN TOP OF A NON - BIODEGRADABLE FILTER FABRIC AND BORDERED NTT 3/16" MO( 51001 OR ALUMINUM EDGING S FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON EXACT PLACEMENT OF PLANTS AROUND ALL BUILDINGS ARID WI1HN T11E PARK SPACE. SEE ENLARGEMENT PLANS SCHEDULE BELOW INCORPORATES ALL PLANT MATERIAL FROM ALL PUNS 10,-- SODDING INSTALLATION: -} 1. 4" TOPSOIL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED NM THE SUBSOIL AND FREE OF CODS. ROCKS, AND DEBRIS 115 APPROVED BY TIE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR 70 INSTALLATION. 2. AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD SHALL BE FERRIC® WITH 25 POUNDS PER 1000 50.17. (1000 L8 /AC) OE 1D -2-10 FER15JZER AND WORKED N70 RE TOPSOIL 1 TOPSOIL SHALL BE DAMPENED PRIOR TO LA1'OG IRE 505. JOINS N THE 50D SHALL BE STAGGERED, AND 1140 EDGES BUTTED TOGETHER TIGHTLY TO AV0D GAPS BETWEEN SID LENGTHS 4. 5CO N51211. D ON SLOPES x1 DR GREATER. DR N AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOWS. SHALL BE STAKED N PLANS. NSTALL THE 500 WITH THE LENGTH PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATER FLOW FOR SLOPES WITH SHEET FLOW. 5. AFTER INSTALLATION, AREAS SHALL BE TAMPED OR ROLLID TO PROVIDE GOOD CONTACT BETWEEN 50D AND SOL AFTER ROLLING. THE SOD SHOULD BE WATERED 50 THAT THE SOIL 5 MO15TE1ED 4 INCHES BELOW THE 500. 4)-- SODDING MAINTENANCE: --4. 1. N THE ABSENCE CF ADEQUATE R2NFAIL. WATER SOD DURING THE 30 DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING PLACELE]1T ID KEEP SOL MOST. FOLLOWING THIS INITIAL 30 DAY ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. WRIER AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE MOISTURE N THE ROOT ZONE. 2. WHERE MOWING 5 DESIRED, MAINTAIN GRASS NOWT OF 3 INCHES AND SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED UNTIL RE SOD IS FIRMLY 80137ED. USUALLY TWO TO THREE REEKS AFTER 50D 5 INSTALLED. 3. INSPECT AREAS CIF CONCENTRATED FLOW ANNUALLY AND FOLLOWING INTENSE STORMS MAKE NEEDED REPNR AND REYEGETATE PROMPTLY. 4- SEEDI N G RECOMMENDATIONS: -(f)- 1. INFILTRATION BASIN SHAM RECEIVE A NATIVE SEED MO SPECIFIED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. STABIU2ED SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE NATIVE SEED MO AS SPEWED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 3. CONTRACTOR SNAIL INSPECT BASIN SEEDING WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. SEEDING AND SURFACE CONDITIONS TO INSURE THE INIEOBTY O THE EROSION CONTROL MIDI AND STABILIZATION IS ME BASIL 4. THE CONSECUTIVE YEAR MANIENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NATIVE PLANTINGS ARE NOTED N ONE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. PREPARE 511E AND SEED BASIN BETWEEN MAY 1 -JULY 1. MOW BASIN SLOPES AT A HEIGHT OF C -B' EVERY 30 DAYS AFTER PLANTING UNTIL S010018ER 30 OR PER SUPPLIERS RECOMMENDAIIOIG. FOR CONSECUTIVE YEAR MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS. SEE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. AllhAm ‘311,10F® 4).- PLANTING SCHEDULE - OTT. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DECIDUOUS TREES 1. ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED EXCEPT 114E SLOPE BETWEEN THE 1AO5T EAST GARAGE DRIVE ACCESS AND THE =STING WETLAND. AND ALL AREAS RECEDING CITY SPEWED SEED MIX. 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL Sumer IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. ALL TURF AREAS PLANTING BEDS. AND ISLANDS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. 8410011021 STSTDI WILL BE DESIGN - BUILD. CONSERVATION NOTES: I.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO IDENTIFY AND PROTECT ON -SITE VEGETATION IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWNGS 1D BE RETAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF IRE CONTRACT. 2 E NECESSARY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTOR FENCE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION DELINEATE GENERAL POSITION OF TEMPORARY FENDING CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE FENCE ON OR NEAR THE SURVEYED PROPERTY Leff SO AS TO NOT INTERFERE WITH CONSRRUC110N OF IMPROVEMENTS. 3. FOAL LOCATION AND NSTALLAIION OF STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS SHALL BE COORDINATED RATH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACONITES 4. VERIFY. ESTABLISH. FLAG. MID MAINTAIN 1C MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER ALONG EXISTING WE71AN0 THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OtSTU NB 0051910 MATERIALS SPEOFICALLY, BUT NOT WADED TO. SOIL COMPACTION. DEPOSIT 00 DEHR6, AND MATERIAL STOWN0.NG. CEMENT CONCRETE TRUER CLEAVING WITHAL THE WETLAND BUFFER DELINEATOR l-- IRRIGATION NOTES: HARTFORD NM I LIT) ah Ilr 10 Ik 4MdMr. Inwd RA PIP. W Ra ..r la tApm..rrl aw ay Liana IAN.. MIAlr m Y lwe r Oft rMsnela D+ I_ W 2419H RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAFES 1. CONTRACTOR TO WRIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND /ABOVE GROUND FACTURES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONANSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND /ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND NSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND METERING FACILITIES. 4. IRRIGATION WATER UNE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1 -x' AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE 5. ALL MAIN LANES SHALL BE 18' BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 6. ALL LATERAL ONES SHALL BE 12' BELLOW FINISHED GRADE. 7. ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2' -0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF 111E TOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2' -0' BEYOND PAVEMENT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WI114 THE SLEEVING MATERIAL 'ELLED' TO 2' -0' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED. 10. FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION. 11. BACICFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS 12. ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR. 13. GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE 14. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON -SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTIVE 15. CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE RUN UNDER MAIN UNE. USE MOISTURE -PROOF SPLICES AND SPUCE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM %ONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES. 16. AVOID OVERSPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE 17. ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE 18. USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AN 'A5 -BUILT' PLAN OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF COMPLETION TO OWNER'S REPRESENTIVE. A SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON -SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION. 20. ALL PIPE 3' AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN. 21. ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3' MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4' WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT r BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM 22 SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWER CONNECTIONS. EXISTING WETLAND 20 0 40 © •V1.101.0.2005, NIMUFORD mow NL at44001M17130.1151.M4E45 :Ott T ROOT NNUMUM SIZE COMMENTS 20 HONEY LOCUST 13 RED MAPLE 13 REDMOND UIDEN 31 RED OAK 12 SWAMP WHITE OAK CNdHsio T000ntoe Ver. Home Apr manna Tdie anari *ma Radnond Warma men= Wardn Nee. 019111 01)0 TIERS B&B 2 1/2' CAL 829 2 1/2' CAL B &B 2 1 CAL B&B 2 1/2' CAL B&B 2 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FOAL 7 BLA 01 HILLS 5PRULZ 21 AMERICAN LARCH 12 WHITE PALE Plpo Houp denaet0 Lora tar.. Ping M.N. B&B 6 HT. Beth 6 HT. B&B 6 HT. SINGLE LEADER -DENSE FORM SINGLE LEADER - DENS FORM SINO3E LEADER -DENSE FORM O* 0- 0- 0- eiAt ORNAMENTAL TREES 5 SUGAR TIME CRABAPPLE MMus 'SUtvscm' 45 JAPANESE TREE LILAC 51t290 re ieulot0 31 THORNLESS HAWTHORN 28 PAPER 9RCH B &B 1 1/2 CAL SPECIMEN FORM B&B 1 1/2' CAL SPECIMEN FORM Crotoeoos w'•-aoni verIely 'here. 82520 990294191 B &B 1 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM 8908 1 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 8 56 COMPACT PRA RHODODENDRON Rhododvldron P.J./.. Compact' 56 IVORY HALO DOGWOOD 427 IIITLE PRINCESS 5PNAEA 154 COMPACT BURNING BUSH Cronus ales 'Balhdo DONT. 18 " -24' HT. DENSE BRANCH CONT. 18' -24' HT. DENSE BRANCH 5 60ao Nepal= 111110 PF00.00 CONT. 18' -24' HT. DENSE BRANCH ER.Wnu6 Volta 'Gerneeetua 994 HONEIROSE HONEISUCKLE Lploara s Hene rose' 137 BAGATELLE BARBERRY BerSSe thunearyi 'Beaotrb' CONT. 18' -24' HT. DENSE BRANCH CONT. 15 -18' HT, DENSE BRANCH CONT. 1r -18' HT DENSE BRANCH COMFIIOOUS SHRUBS 8 TECNNY AR808127AE 140 MU91IO SLOWMOUND 502 GOLDEN ARBORINTAE Thula oo2daltola 'Teelno Pinua mueo '9oamound The)/ occident/Fla a 31 DWARF BRIE GLOBE SPRUCE Pkeo eunavls '6labpo' CONT. 6' HT. DEVISE BRANCH CONT. 18' -24' HT. DENS BRANCH CENT. 15' -10' HT. DENSE BRANCH CONT. 18' -24' HT. DENSE BRANCH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET-WE EROSION CONTROL NOTES NATIVE SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR 70 INSTALL/AIM FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC. LWOIttu 641,101114424 TOO 248008)801111200 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKE MINNESOTA ISSUE: 12/20/02 PIMAI. 511E PI M 0/18/06 CITY SUWMOTAL 4/1/00 CITY LWWENS 6/5/06 CRY SUOMTTAL 5/5/x6 618•50 A REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C5.0 SIG L /AU FOR --I AVON I--SEE SIIf 2 /AS. ' —I DILAxGEO ELEVATION SW 4 /A$3 FOR—I SGm ELEYATI7N ��,,,,, 1 FoR �EN an LAROm ATWN � 1—saENI.AORm tLEVAnO�II SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 FRONT ELEVATION1 1 FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION SCALE TAT-1'd HSEE sNr 2/AS.1 run —I ENIAxDm ELEVATION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 REAR ELEVATION [—SEE MG 2/44.1 FOR •--I ENLARGED ELEVATION I--SEE BHT 2 /44.1 FOR ENLARGED ATION SCALE 1/C =V-Er C2 SEE SNT SAM FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 SIDE ELEVATION1 SCALE: 1/B' -1•-O • SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 SIDE ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/S' -1'-0• RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF UNO LAKES ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER 111 HARTFORD Y LID Mill• RAW RAM rein 6PM' seal Illat Nis Pe..1..N6me is.i A ree.6 H ea. m =Ow q awl yaws sd Ihe r l s M. 4y • F3/FA3 AnTB.tl v dr IM iw. d Is di d Wsed.. mdtl W Wes DA._ RgWdis 63. vac CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC U00 WENS FARGO WAU NOD MUM AVEN E64/52 952{36],09 93]4363921 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE UNMAKES MINSESCTA ISSUE: 11/11/2005 CONGER 12 /1/2065 REV. EawcER 12/7/2005 REV. rnKCEPT 12/21/2665 REV. G6NGEPf 1/13/2006 REV. GLNCEPT 2/3 /200s REV. 9291cEr 3/13/2006 CWT swum. 4/3/2005 REV. 1>lIKE91 4/27/2006 REV. art 51605. 5/5/2055 alt S16N1fAL 5/5/2001 510 SET REV, THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEETTTRE: SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A5.1 HIES 917 1 AL I FOR —I A710M I—S E 91f 1t //ALA ELEVA ITN --I E11416om 7gM 97T 2/Ait roe—I LL ATl I— 3a !2•f 1t //*Lt FOR ENIAIOEO kLEVA1NN/ SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 FRONT ELEVATION1 I--SEE 9a D//ALA FOS DIMMED LLEVATIOM SCALE 19,1,0" — ■ = r+; L = J B1 = SEE Siff 4 V�Al ONN EMLAROm aA1O SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 REAR ELEVATION C3 1—sa9RARLm 4.90.71014 O C I-7EE Sr AL.2 rat ---I AWN SCALE 1tr -To 92917L OVALS FOR B 3 °"AILED ADON SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 SIDE ELEVATION1 SCALE: 1!14' -1'o 9s 947 3 /AL3 FON EMIR® azvAnati SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 SIDE ELEVATION2 SCALE 1Ar -1'd RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER rilE HARTFORD MOM. KIODRAM IIVZONGION. 0421 T<II®6..• 1 MN* =fly 6> r Oa *W.10= And �rsw .•,µ� MOW. AA.. Aar r rs ar w.A Wreak or X022 inner NNE CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC „10POLS TANGO 99.. 7910 wpIM =OS AVEN9 912 -6362•0 910ib -210 PRLUECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINOLAKM MINNESOTA ISSUE: II /II/:oo3 =Km .2/ Vans REV. CONCEPT I2/7/2O ID. CONCEPT IL21/ID03 REV. CoNnsT I/12/2006 i v. CONCEPT 2/2/2CO6 EE, COwePT 2/I3/2226 COT S1MEORA. 4/2/2CO6 EEV. mwaOT 6/27/2206 2tN. OTT sunlit 2/2/2®6 COT Oman. 1/6 /2006 no SET ., REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A5.2 L.EGF4C'r TOW4OME AT WOOZ?S EDGE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC, o Minnesota Limited Liability company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the City of Lino Lakes, State of Minnesota. County of Anoko, to wit: Outlot D, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anolka County, Minnesota. Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC In witness whereof said Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by Rs proper officer this day of 200_ John C. Brandt Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument wos acknowledged before me this day of 200__. by John C. Brant, as chief manager of Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE; that this plat is a correct representation of said survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat In feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments will be correctly placed in the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on said plat and that there are no wet lands as defined In Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 505.02 Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated other than as shown on said plat. Eric R. Vlckaryous, Land Surveyor Minnesota Registration No. 44125 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this Surveyor. day of 200 by Eric R. VIckaryous, Land Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires This plat of LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE was approved by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 200 and if applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03. Subd. 2. By Mayor By This plat has been checked and approved this day of Larry D. Holum Anoka County Surveyor RECEIVED JUL 1 8 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT MARKED AS MARKED All monuments required by Minnesota Statute, and not shown on this plat. will be set within one year of the recording date of thls plat, and shall be evidenced by a 1/2 inch by 18 inch Iron pipe marked by RLS 44125. For the purposes of this plat the south Ilne of Outlot D, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota, Is assumed to have a bearing of N89°33'45 "W. so 200_ City Clerk NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. / / / / / / / / / 66 / / / / / / / 8sA •-OS O 3g / / / / / / 5 / / / .!G zz ONof 40.07 - R =233.00 �- ., =o9•51'16• �. 22.49 R =265,00.'^'` ©045146 -c / / / / a, / / / / / / / / / City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section ii, T31, R22 e \ \ / •0 � `- % ..i^ r u 50o , \ n 6- tay 29 0 b 1 `�o `P8 .. , 43-.a ,5$- -\9 ° \ r ' o. rr'o � i9-i9 - � mt ■m ¢ \ 1-ii------,v,°\`'°-,C O` m' t� g'� �.... 101' _- - / - i/ , 45 7 2 `i ,, 17 J, W ..7.4,..31,0,,,,9_,...9-•, ? 1 ,-(.4„...,, .' 3X041 h�A o 1 • w 1 pN. 3N '4, ). - ge ` s °I V dy°.,'' C rao°'m ^�dh'50'Ii,W �a;4ty a -_'1 X' T0�6- o 0 1 9 0 ° '12, �i ip c i'8/....--45.° - 4I .4" • I^ 1I. 1 ' 1 ti m 1 .- -; 7e ,o •,,, I • IS, " Si ° .� Pp ra IN „1z Ie ,(�� og row. N' %, ,- �sir2 vs Aww .NI ( • 6 o �,L �SF o��d+��C� .. q11:4_4$142,9.4:,%'- 1 ,, 0 .,-., 301 "E 5'�.� .` 4 i- 149.45 1 t • .....,,i-2.,„ -i N89.3 '45'W _ 96.29 - TR 56526.12 w Y '0,,A, - >Droinoge one utGitysasemenlrl- ' "I445_ 9-- /y Jc9.' 4" Po° .2 .6 1 N878'36'W 11778); t� ' .1- ,S929W ,,44;', , 21 "may e on �a r0 1 60 DETAIL "A" (no scale) ,- 1 vs, 1 0 124 m w 11Am'�m 51 67.65 7 -- -. -. _l£q :- 149.45 - N87.8'36'W, 57- - . 117,76 -2.23 4 39 W r 734.43 ` , S89.33'45.6 N00'36'41'w 7 OUTLOT B Drainage and utility easement throughout Outlot 8 219.54 N89 °33'45 "R 32.00' r -South line of Outlot D, THE VILLAGE NO. 3 ., ., 25.17 21.67 21.67 21.67 21.67 21.67 25.17 r1 rg2r °3r4g5r <6ra7r 25.17= 21.6] 21.67 21.67 21.67 21.6? 25.17 J r 60 30.68 - N01.25.48 "W 589.33'45'E 158.67 �! 541.29 60 %1400.20 xi sb bo E. CI. RUC 4 SONS, INC. Land Surveyors 9 \rud\ CAD \03proj \03170PP \03170 -FINAL- PLAT- 5TH.dwg 7/11/2006 11,55,14 AM CDT HARTFORD GROUP, A/E INC. LEGACY TOWNHOMES 4.26.2006 WES UM UM ■ _ ■■ _■ 5_ ARTIST CONCEPT This is an artist concept end It subject to ch•noe. A proposal for: Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Submitted to: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Submitted by: DSU SRF TKDA 1v July 19, 2006 300 FIRST AVE N SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 -2609 July 19, 2006 TEL: 612- 339 -3300 FAX: 612- 337 -5601 WEB: DSUPLAN,COM Honorable Mayor and City Council C/O Gordon Heitke, City Administrator Lino Lakes City Hall 600 Town Center Parkway City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 COMMUNITY PLANNING LAND PLANNING URBAN DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MARKET RESEARCH RE: Transmittal of a Proposal to Provide Professional Planning Services Honorable Mayor and Council Members: Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City of Lino Lakes in updating your comprehensive plan, in coordination with your Community Visioning process and other important ongoing initiatives. We are proud of the work that we have done together in the past and we are excited to continue to support your community as it sets the standard for conservation development and sustainability throughout the region. Our recent past work together on the I -35E Corridor AUAR has been the focus of planning journal articles, was recently highlighted in the Urban Land Institute and Sensible Land Use Coalition program on conservation development and is being nominated for an award through the Minnesota Planning Association. The steps you have taken in completing the community survey and initiating the community visioning process are exactly the right ones for Lino Lakes. The Comprehensive Plan will provide yet another important opportunity for broad community participation and establish the detailed action plan to effectuate your vision. We are proud to be invited to help you to complete this vitally important set of tasks. The proposal that is attached takes full advantage of all of the good work that is already in place and is designed to coordinate seamlessly with the work being done by Carl Neu and the Visioning Committee. It is also designed to coordinate efficiently with the broad planning work to be completed by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Our recommended approach places the Planning and Zoning Board in a key role, while supporting them and augmenting their capacity through the appointment of representatives of other boards and commissions, interest groups and citizens at large. This Advisory Panel will serve as the primary working group throughout the comprehensive planning process. We also recommend inviting some members of the Visioning Committee to serve on the Advisory Panel to ensure continuity. Another key characteristic of our approach and proposed process is that it is designed to support you as the decision making body. You will be kept informed throughout this process and you and you alone will make the go /no go decisions at the completion of each phase along this iterative process. Before you will be asked to decide, you will have all of the relevant information, the advice and counsel of your staff and the Advisory Panel, as well as the consultant team. You will also be informed about all of the questions that have been asked and answered and be provided with a summary of all of the public input that has been received. In short, you will be in the best position to make informed decisions. Finally, another cornerstone of this process will be communication. Following your decisions at the conclusion of each stage of the process there will be a major communication effort. This will include community newsletters, web page, local newspapers and other media. Every correspondence and announcement will provide the community with information about how to participate and opportunities to provide input. Please note at the end of each phase that the work product and other "deliverables" are identified. We want to make certain that we are providing what you need and want, so give this information careful scrutiny. Thank you again for entrusting us with this vitally important work. You have my personal commitment that all of this work will be done well and on time. I am personally committed to working on this project and attending the key meetings and Ciara Schlichting, AICP, Senior Planner will be the project manager. We are bringing you our A Team and we promise to deliver our best work. Sincerely, DSU /Bonestroo John W. Shardlow, Principal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Process, Schedule and Cost of Services 1 1 City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Lino Lakes is required to update its Comprehensive Plan to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the information in the Met Council system statement for the City. The City wishes to identify and comprehensively plan for growth and development in the City. This will include reviewing the land use classifications, planning for utility expansion and staging, planning to protect open space while enhancing the Cities' existing parks and trails system, and determining the character and impact of growth for the areas of the City that are experiencing new growth and development. The City is rich with potential amenities including the lakes, a growing commercial and residential base, and abundant natural resources throughout the City. Most importantly, the residents, City Council and Staff are all eager to work cooperatively to guide the form that their City will take. This planning process is unique among comprehensive planning processes. The vision, goals and policies, all critical input for the formulation of any plan, are being formulated in a comprehensive visioning process under the direction of Carl Neu of Neu & Company. These outcomes will feed directly into the formulation of the alternatives and draft plan. The alternatives developed in this plan will be used in a Resource Management Plan being developed by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Ensuring the seamless interaction and intercommunication between these processes will lead to a coordinated planning effort that is not only unique in the Twin Cities region, but has the potential to be foundational in its integration of resource protection and environmental planning into the comprehensive planning process. Using this process, the City can choose to plan efficiently for its future by promoting compact, orderly development that makes the most efficient use of existing and future infrastructure while enhancing and protecting open space and valuable natural resources. Using DSU's extensive planning experience, we will adapt the following key elements to ensure a successful planning process: • Prepare solid research, information and analysis • Assist stakeholders in articulating their vision and goals for the community • Communicate clearly and often with the community and stakeholders • Involve creative design ideas and strategies • Analyze alternative scenarios • Present information to the City Council at key points in the process to ensure their approval • Present the final plan to the Planning and Zoning Board for their review as required by State statute • Forward options and recommendations to the City Council, the ultimate decision - makers • Work with the Metropolitan Council staff throughout the process to ensure consistency with regional Goals • and Policies • Utilize state -of- the -art technology as well as old- fashioned hands -on planning and design techniques We anticipate that the key issues in the Comprehensive Planning process will include: • Building on the information, goals and visions of the previous Comprehensive Plan • The land use of the developing areas of the City • Determining the staging of future growth • Determining the character of growth throughout the City (density and development type) • Determining the appropriate amount of land for residential, commercial and industrial uses • Planning for future infrastructure needs • Updating the Parks and Trails Plan • Maximizing the protection and utilization of Lino Lakes' abundant natural resources • Providing alternative development scenarios for use the in upcoming Resource Management Plan Natural resource systems, transportation corridors, and a balanced pattern of future land uses must be woven into a strong, cohesive community design. This planning process must be open and inclusive, but it must also support clear and timely decision making by the Lino Lakes City Council. This entire process is designed to empower and support the Council. Before every key decision - making point, the Council will have the benefit of the opinions and recommendations 1 . VL 71F DSU City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal of the public, City staff, Advisory Panel, and Consultant Team. The process hinges on a set of key decisions made by the Council. The Council is involved and directs the entire process following extensive input. NI .1VL DSU City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal APPROACH Advisory Panel To begin the process, the City Council will appoint an Advisory Panel. The Panel will support broad community participation and input throughout the Comprehensive Planning Process. It is not intended that they will officially vote, or take positions as a body. Rather, all of their opinions about every topic will be summarized and presented to the City Council. Consequently, we would suggest a large, broad representation of opinions and perspectives and as large a group as necessary to ensure that no one feels left out. The Panel should include the Planning and Zoning Board, representatives from each of the City Boards and Commissions, representatives of the business community, and other City residents. We have discussed the appointment process with City Staff, and we will continue to work with them to refine the process to reach the most effective outcome. Technical Committee The other important body in this process is the Technical Committee. This committee will be appointed by the Community Development Director, and will include representatives of City departments. This committee will contain the expertise and first -hand knowledge of the city and its technical details necessary to drive effective decision - making. Their opinions and recommendations will be presented to the Advisory Panel, Planning and Zoning Board and City Council. The Consultant Team also anticipates the participation of the City Staff as advisers throughout the planning process. Their involvement will be critical to ensure proper coordination with other, ongoing activities and to ensure that the consultants take full advantage of all existing work. We propose a six - phased process as a framework for the Comprehensive Planning process. The attached Process Diagram shows the phases in more detail. Phase 1: Inventory and Analysis This phase includes the initiation of the process with the City Council and Advisory Panel and the collection and analysis of all necessary background data. Data will be collected and analyzed from the following areas: • Land Use • Demographics • Market Analysis • Housing • Natural Resources • Water Resources o Wastewater o Water Supply o Surface Water Management • Transportation • Community Facilities This phase will conclude with a Background Report that summarizes the collected information and a joint Planning and Zoning Board and City Council Workshop to present the Background Report and collect public input. Dellverab /e: Background Report Phase 2: Goals and Policies During this phase, the Advisory Panel will receive the results of the Visioning process being led by Neu and Company and the Community Visioning Committee. Using the input from that process, the Advisory Panel will formulate a set of goals and policies for topic areas to be addressed in the plan. These topic areas will include: • Land Use and Growth Management • Transportation 3 City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal • Housing • Commercial areas • Parks and Trails • Urban Design • Environment and Natural Resources Protection • Public Infrastructure and Staging • Regional Planning • Community Facilities and Services The Vision and Goals will be reviewed first by the Technical Committee and Advisory Panel, and then by the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council in a joint workshop setting. Deliverable.. Final Vision and Goals and Policies Phase 3: Alternatives DSU will prepare and present alternative concepts for various elements of the Vision, Goals and Policies. Two alternatives will be developed for the entire city, and three for the growth areas identified in the course of the process. These alternatives may include development patterns and forms, land use scenarios and optional implementation strategies. These concepts will be reviewed and discussed by the Technical Committee before being presented to the Advisory Panel. After this initial round of review, the City Council will meet to review the Alternatives in a workshop setting. The alternatives will then be revised and reviewed with the Technical Committee before preparation for a public open house. The Advisory Panel will attend the public open house and DSU will collect public input on the alternatives. After the open house, the Planning and Zoning Board will meet to review public comment and recommend a preferred alternative. The City Council will then meet to review this recommendation and make the final selection, Deliverable.. Preferred Alternatives Phase 4: Draft Comprehensive Plan DSU will prepare a Draft Comprehensive Plan consisting of the following sections: • Background • Vision, Goals and Policies • Land Use and Growth Management • Transportation o Roads o Transit o Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities o Aviation • Water Resources o Wastewater o Water Supply o Surface Water Management • Community Facilities • Parks, Open Space & Natural Areas • Implementation This draft plan will be reviewed by both the Technical Committee and the Advisory Panel at separate meetings before being presented to the Planning and Zoning Board in a workshop setting. This workshop will be an opportunity to collect feedback and inform the Planning and Zoning Board about the Plan in a hands -on, informal setting using maps, graphics and other tools. The next meeting will be a public Open House, at which DSU will present the Plan. DSU will then present the Plan to the City Council in a workshop setting to encourage input. DSU will revise the Draft Plan based 4 V VL '1F DSU City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal �v le on the Planning and Zoning Board's input. The Plan will then be presented again to the City Council. They will accept the Plan and authorize distribution to reviewing jurisdictions as mandated by the Metropolitan Council. De /iverab /e: Draft Plan for distribution to Met Council and adjacent jurisdictions and school districts Phase 5: Adjacent Jurisdiction Review and Informal Met Council Review In this final stage, the Plan will be distributed to adjacent jurisdictions and the Metropolitan Council for review. DSU will first prepare the plan for distribution to adjacent jurisdictions, the school districts, and the Met Council, and distribute it. During the review period, DSU and City Staff will meet with Met Council staff to review the Plan and make any necessary revisions to meet the requirements of the Met Council and state law. DSU and City Staff will meet with representatives of adjacent jurisdictions to discuss comments. DSU will assist City Staff in submitting responses to comments from both the Council and adjacent jurisdictions. After all comments have been addressed, the Planning and Zoning Board will meet to recommend approval of the Plan to the City Council. The City Council will then meet to give their preliminary approval and submit the plan to the Met Council for official review. Phase 6: Met Council Formal Review and Final Plan Adoption After all Met Council comments have been addressed, and the plan is determined complete for Met Council review, DSU will attend the Met Council Community Development Committee (CDC) meeting to discuss any issues outstanding with the Plan. After CDC review, the plan will be forwarded to the full Met Council for review. DSU will attend any additional necessary meetings. After all requirements for Met Council review have been satisfied and necessary changes made to the plan, the City Council will meet to adopt the plan. They will be provided with the final plan in advance of the meeting to ensure all feedback has been addressed. Deliverable.' Final Comprehensive Plan Communication Efforts This process hinges on the decisions of the City Council. However, it is driven by input from the public. A key to the success of the planning process will be efforts to engage the public, encouraging participation in the dialog at each public meeting, and ensuring that they are informed about what stage the planning process is in and that they are familiar with the work that has been done to date. Following the Council decisions at the end of each Phase, there will be an extensive public communication effort. These efforts will utilize every available means of public communication including newsletters, email distribution lists, direct mailings, and local newspapers. The communication efforts correspond directly to the decision - making steps of the City Council. Communication efforts will correspond to the following events: • Initiation of the Planning Process • City Council review of the Background Report • Review of the Vision, Goals and Policies • Selection of a Preferred Alternative • Approval of the Draft Plan for Met Council Review • Adoption of the Final Plan Besides these specific events, the public will be kept informed of the process and important meeting dates, and have access to relevant documents through the city's website. A Council- Centric Process As mentioned above, this process will be driven by the decisions of the City Council. The Council will first give their approval to begin the process and establish an Advisory Panel. At the end of each Phase, the Council will review the work up to that point, make comments, and either initiate the next phase, or give guidance for revisions to be made. 5 71r. DSU City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal The City Council is always the final decision- maker. Only once the Council has given approval, does the process move to the next phase. 6 .d to I. '1F DSU City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal WORK PROGRAM Phase 1: Inventory and Analysis Task 100: Project Initiation with City Council DSU will present the planning process and respond to any questions or comments the Council may have. The Council will give approval for the initiation of the planning process. The City Council will establish an Advisory Panel to guide the Comprehensive Planning Process. The Panel should include the Planning and Zoning Board, representatives from each of the city boards and commissions, representatives of the business community landowners, key interest groups, community organizations and other city residents Communication Effort #1 This step will trigger the first major communication effort, introducing the process to the public and informing them of ways they can be involved. This effort will utilize the website and other media. Task 101: Project Initiation Meeting with Technical Committee DSU will meet with the Technical Committee to review the process and schedule, agree on roles and responsibilities, and answer questions about the process. Task 102: Met Council Staff Meeting — Regional Issues DSU and City Staff will meet with the Metropolitan Council Sector Representative and other key staff members to discuss issues of regional significance that could be addressed during the planning process. Met Council staff comments will be recorded and summarized for communication to the Technical Committee and Advisory Panel. Task 103: Land Use, Regional Planning Designation DSU will review past studies and reports, and current data and policies. DSU will work with City staff to identify the specific information, statistics, and analysis to be included in the Plan beyond the current comprehensive plan. The information to be collected will include: • Updated existing land use • Land use conflicts and opportunities DSU will review the current comprehensive plan, the city's land use ordinances and other plans and ordinances as recommended by City Staff. With guidance from City Staff and the Advisory Panel, DSU will ensure that any land use alternatives developed during the process are consistent with the long -term vision for the City. It is assumed as part of our cost estimate that City Staff will provide DSU with an updated existing land use inventory for use in the process. Task 104: Demographics and Forecast DSU will conduct an analysis of demographics including any existing projections of population growth in the City of Lino Lakes. Particular attention will be paid to growth or decline that may affect demand for housing, city services, tax base, school enrollment or other key issues. Task 105: Market Analysis DSU will use existing market studies and collect additional data to analyze: • The demand for residential units by type • The market position of housing stock in Lino Lakes as compared to other communities in similar market positions • The demand for office, retail and industrial land uses 7 toL 71 F DSU City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal Task 106: Housing Using information from the two previous tasks, DSU will summarize the housing market in Lino Lakes. This will not be a comprehensive inventory, but a general discussion of the market for various housing types in the city, and any gaps between current supply and demand. Task 107: Natural Resources Jason Huseth completed a Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) for the city. DSU will obtain this information in a GIS- compatible format and compile the data for inclusion in the Background Report and as a key starting point for the development of alternatives in Phase 3. Task 108: Water Resources TKDA and DSU will review the city's existing wastewater, water supply and surface water management plans. Items or areas in need of update or review will be noted, and considerations for the Background Report will be made. A full update of these plans will be done in Task 403. Task 109: Transportation SRF and DSU will review the city's existing transportation plans including roads, transit, bicycle and pedestrian and aviation. Items or areas in need of update or review will be noted, and considerations for the Background Report will be made. A full update of these plans will be done in Task 402. Task 110: Community Facilities City staff will complete an inventory of community facilities and provide that inventory to the consultant team. DSU will incorporate this inventory into the Background Report. Task 111: Prepare Draft Background Report DSU will summarize the results of the above analyses and meetings in a Draft Background Report to be distributed to the Technical Committee and Advisory Panel. The report will provide base information to inform later tasks in the planning process. Task 112: Technical Committee — Review Background Report DSU will present the Background Report to the Technical Committee and facilitate discussion of the analyses. The Technical Committee's detailed knowledge of all issue areas will be valuable in revising the Background Report for presentation to the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council. Task 113: Joint Planning and Zoning Board & City Council Workshop DSU will present the Background Report to the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council at a joint meeting for their review and comment so that they are up to date with the information, analysis and preliminary goals of the process as it progresses. Input from the Planning and Zoning Board or City Council will trigger revisions to the Background Report as necessary. The process will only move to Phase 2 once both the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council have given approval of the Background Report. Communication Effort #2 This step will also trigger the second major communication effort, making the approved Background Report available and updating the public on the progress of the planning process via the website and other mediums and responding to any questions or comments. Phase 2: Goals and Policies Task 200: Advisory Panel Initiation Meeting DSU will meet with the Advisory Panel to review the process and schedule, agree on roles and responsibilities, review the results of the Visioning exercise and the Background Report, and answer questions about the process. 8 City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal Task 201: Advisory Panel Issues Forum DSU will facilitate an exercise with the Panel to identify initial issues, opportunities and important stakeholders. This exercise will help to ensure Panel members are engaged and excited about the planning process. The issues and opportunities identified will be used as a basis for future issue analysis and may be included in a revision of the Background Report. Since the comprehensive planning process is meant to build upon the directives from the Visioning exercise completed by Neu and Company, the issues forum will be designed to complement and expand on this work. Advisory Panel members will still have adequate opportunity to present issues as they feel necessary. Task 202: Prepare Draft Goals and Policies Using input from the Visioning exercise and the Advisory Panel issues forum, DSU will formulate a draft set of goals and policies. Topic areas will include at least the following: • Transportation • Housing • Commercial areas • Parks and Trails • Urban Design • Environment • Public Infrastructure • Regional Planning Goal statements will be drafted for each topic area. Each goal will be tied to one or more policy to ensure it is accomplished. The goal statements will drive the preparation of Alternatives and Implementation Strategies in Phase 3. DSU will deliver both a written version of the draft as well as a presentation. Task 203: Technical Committee — Review Draft Goals and Policies DSU will facilitate a meeting of the Technical Committee to review the draft goals and policies. Revisions will be completed based on feedback from the group. Task 204: Advisory Panel — Review Draft Goals and Policies DSU will facilitate a meeting of the Advisory Panel to review the draft goals and policies. Revisions will be completed based on feedback from the group. Task 205: Joint Planning and Zoning Board and City Council Workshop DSU will present the Goals, Policies and a summary of the input from the Technical Committee and Advisory Panel to the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council at a joint meeting for their review and comment. Input from the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council will trigger revisions to the Goals and Policies as necessary. The process will only move to Phase 3 when the City Council has approved the goals and policies. Communication Effort #3 This step will also trigger the third major communication effort, distributing the approved Goals and Policies and updating the public on the progress of the planning process via the website and other mediums and responding to any questions or comments. Phase 3: Alternatives Task 300: Prepare Alternatives Alternative land use plans will be developed for the entire city, as well as for up to three specific growth areas to be determined during the course of the process. 9 City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal Two alternatives will be prepared for the overall city and three will be prepared for the growth areas. DSU will prepare a written description of the alternatives, maps, a presentation and other visual materials to present the alternatives. These concept alternatives will be designed to achieve the Goals within the context of the Comprehensive Plan. These alternatives will illustrate generalized land use, natural resources, transportation, parks, open space, and other pertinent features. Task 301: Technical Committee — Review Alternatives DSU will present the alternatives to the Technical Committee. DSU will facilitate a discussion of the alternatives with the Committee. The Technical Committee will provide comments on the alternatives for presentation to the Advisory Panel, Planning and Zoning Board and City Council. Task 302: Revise Alternatives DSU will revise the alternatives based on input from the Technical Committee. Task 303: Advisory Panel — Review Alternatives DSU will present a summary of the alternatives to the Advisory Panel. DSU will facilitate a discussion of the alternatives with the Panel. The Advisory Panel will provide comments on the alternatives for presentation to the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council. Task 304: City Council Workshop — Review Alternatives DSU will present all the alternatives, the recommendations of the Advisory Panel and the Technical Committee to the City Council for their review and comment. City Council decisions may trigger revisions to the alternatives. Alternatives will be presented to the Council in a hands -on fashion, with maps, drawings, and other tools to clearly convey the input that has been received to date and the objectives behind the recommendations. This will be done in an informal, workshop setting. Task 305: Revise Alternatives DSU will revise the alternatives based on direction from the City Council. Task 306: Technical Committee — Review Alternatives and Prepare for Open House DSU will present the alternatives to the Technical Committee and facilitate a discussion. Comments from the Technical Committee will be recorded to share with the Advisory Panel, Planning and Zoning Board and City Council. In this task, DSU will also prepare for the public open house. DSU will produce maps, drawings and other visual communication tools to display the alternatives and facilitate feedback from the public and the Advisory Panel. Task 307: Public Open House Immediately prior to the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting, the Advisory Panel will host a public open house to facilitate feedback on the alternatives from the general public. City Staff and the consultant team will field questions from the public on the alternatives and generally serve as a resource. Input will be recorded. Task 308: Planning and Zoning Board — Review Alternatives Immediately following the open house, DSU will present the alternatives, as well as a summary of feedback from the public and the Advisory Panel and Technical Committee, to the Planning and Zoning Board. The Planning and Zoning Board will recommend a preferred alternative. Task 309: City Council — Review Alternatives DSU will present the alternatives, along with the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board to the City Council. The City Council will select a preferred alternative. As shown in the process diagram, the preferred alternative will also be used as a "maximum development scenario" for the Resource Management Plan being prepared by the Rice Creek Watershed District. 10 City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal Communication Effort #4 This step will trigger the fourth communication effort, distributing the preferred alternative to the public via the website. The public will also be updated on the progress of the planning effort, and informed of key meeting dates. Phase 4: Draft Comprehensive Plan Task 400: Vision, Goals and Policies Using input from the Visioning exercise, DSU will prepare the Vision, Goals and Policies section for inclusion into the draft plan. A summary of the public process used to arrive at the final Goals and Policies will also be included. Task 401: Land Use and Growth Management Using the preferred alternative, DSU will prepare the plan section outlining the preferred land Plan for the city, as well as any growth management tools and policies. Conformance with all applicable Metropolitan Council requirements will be described, including existing land use, future land use, staging of development, housing and resource protection. Task 402: Transportation DSU and SRF will prepare the plan section dealing with transportation. This will be a full update including roads, transit plans, bicycle and pedestrian facilities and aviation plans. This update will be in accordance with the requirements of the Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook and other relevant state requirements. Optional Service: Development of Transportation Cost Allocation Model As an optional service, SRF Consulting will assist the City in developing a system to assign the costs of transportation improvements to future development based on acreage or development size. SRF will identify the need for future projects based on traffic projections, and estimate any budget shortfall in the funding of those projects. SRF will develop a rationale and methodology to assign costs and train city staff in the use of the system. Task 403: Water Resources TKDA will update the wastewater, water supply and surface water management plans. This update will be in accordance with the requirements of the Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook and other relevant state requirements. Task 404: Community Facilities With input from City Staff, DSU will update the plan section dealing with Community Facilities. This will include an updated inventory, as well as an analysis of future needs, and any plans for additions or expansions. Task 405: Parks, Open Space and Natural Areas DSU will update the plan for parks, open space and natural areas, only to the extent that the new Land Use Plan and preferred alternatives necessitate the modification of the existing Parks, Open Space and Trails Plan. . Task 406: Implementation DSU will prepare the implementation section of the plan. This section will include recommendations on how the plan can be put to use to achieve the vision and goals. For each goal, a responsible party, board or commission will be identified. A timeline for the implementation of each goal will be identified, as well as possible tools and policies that could be used in the implementation. The implementation section will incorporate relevant objectives from the Visioning exercise. The City must provide the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for incorporation (It is not within our scope to update the CIP, although this could be provided as an additional service). An updated zoning Map would be produced, as well as a description of zoning districts including their allowed densities and other standards. 11 NI 'iF DSU City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal The Implementation section of the plan will meet all requirements of the Met Council and other relevant state requirements. Task 407: Technical Committee — Review Draft Plan DSU will present the Draft Plan to the Technical Committee. The Technical Committee will provide comments on the Plan for presentation to the Advisory Panel, Planning and Zoning Board and City Council. Task 408: Advisory Panel — Review Draft Plan DSU will the Draft Plan to the Advisory Panel. DSU will facilitate a discussion of the Plan with the Panel. The Advisory Panel will provide comments for presentation to the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council. Task 409: Planning and Zoning Board Workshop — Review Draft Plan DSU will present the Draft Plan and a summary of the input from the Technical Committee and Advisory Panel to the Planning and Zoning Board for their review and comment. Input from the Planning and Zoning Board will trigger revisions to the Draft Plan as necessary. Task 410: Revise Draft Plan DSU will revise the Draft Plan based on input from the Technical Committee, Advisory Panel and Planning and Zoning Board in preparation for the public open house and Planning and Zoning Board hearing. Task 411: Open House and Planning and Zoning Board Public Hearing Immediately prior to the Planning and Zoning Board public hearing, City Staff will assist DSU in holding a public open house to facilitate feedback on the Draft Plan from the general public. The Planning and Zoning Board will host the public hearing. The Advisory Panel will be invited. City Staff and DSU will field questions from the public on the plan and input will be recorded. Immediately following the open house, DSU will present the Draft Plan, as well as a summary of feedback from the public, the Advisory Panel and Technical Committee, to the Planning and Zoning Board. The Planning and Zoning Board will vote to recommend the plan to the City Council for distribution to adjacent communities and the Metropolitan Council. Task 412: City Council Workshop City Staff and DSU will present the Draft Plan to the City Council in a workshop setting to facilitate feedback on the plan. Comments will be recorded. Task 413: City Council — Accept Plan and Authorize Distribution to Adjacent Jurisdictions DSU will make revisions to the Plan as necessary based on direction from the City Council. The City Council will meet to review the final draft plan and authorize its distribution to adjacent jurisdictions for review consistent with Met Council requirements. Phase 5: Six -Month Review Process Task 500: Submit to Jurisdictions and Met Council for 6 -month Review Consistent with the requirements of the Met Council, DSU will assist the city in submitting the Draft Plan to adjacent jurisdictions, school districts, watershed districts, and the Met Council. Task 501: Meetings with Jurisdictions to Review and Discuss Draft Plan DSU will attend up to four meetings with jurisdictions reviewing the Draft Plan and discuss their questions and concerns. TKDA and SRF will provide technical consultation during these meetings. Task 502: Respond to Comments and Recommend Revisions if Necessary 12 A,1 DSU City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal DSU will assist the City in responding to comments submitted by adjacent jurisdictions and other groups reviewing the draft plan. If revisions to the plan are deemed necessary, DSU will complete those revisions with technical assistance from TKDA and SRF. Task 503: Planning and Zoning Board — Recommend Approval After revisions are made to the Draft Plan, the Planning and Zoning Board will meet to review the Plan and recommend approval to the City Council. Task 504: City Council — Preliminary Approval The City Council will meet to review the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board and give their preliminary approval of the Plan contingent on Met Council review. Task 505: Prepare and Submit Plan to Met Council for Review DSU will prepare the Plan, along with all comments from reviewing jurisdictions as well as the city's responses, and submit them to the Met Council for their official review. An update copy of the plan will be submitted to adjacent jurisdictions as well, consistent with state law. Phase 6: Met Council Formal Review & Final Plan Adoption Task 600: Meetings with Met Council Staff The consultant team will attend up to two meetings with Met Council staff to respond to comments and discuss revisions to the plan. Task 601: Respond to Met Council Comments The consultant team will make revisions as necessary and officially respond to comments made by Met Council Staff. Task 602: Attend Met Council Community Development Meeting DSU will attend the Met Council Community Development Meeting to represent the City when approval is recommended. Task 603: Attend Met Council Meeting DSU will attend a meeting of the full Met Council to represent the City when the plan is approved. Task 604: Finalize Plan DSU will make any necessary revisions to the Plan based on input from the Met Council or City Council. Task 605: City Council — Final Plan Adoption After all necessary revisions have been made; DSU will prepare a final document for presentation to the City including electronic and paper copies of the plan. The City Council will meet to officially adopt the plan. Communication Effort #5 This step will trigger the final communication effort, distributing the Final Plan to the public via the website and as a hard copy. After this communication, the City will take ownership of the document and be the point of contact for future requests for the plan. 13 City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal COST OF SERVICES Our proposal includes a work program and cost estimate for all phases of the project, based on our experience and tied to assumptions about the nature and scope of work in each phase. Because of the scale of this project and its dynamic and multi- faceted nature, it is impossible to anticipate all of the factors that could affect the scope, timing, and nature of the proposed services. We also recognize that you need to establish a clear working understanding regarding costs for the City. We have therefore used our best judgment in projecting the nature and scope of the consultant's involvement. We are open to modifying any aspect of this proposal to achieve a better result for the City. We will make every effort to manage costs, and we will undertake only that work that has been discussed and approved by the City. DSU will be the lead consultants responsible for managing and facilitating the process to complete the work program. DSU will coordinate the billings by reviewing the request for payment from each firm prior to transmitting their billings to the City. All work and meetings will be computed on a Time -Plus- Materials basis. Costs for work and materials that may be requested, in addition to the services listed, will be added to the estimated figure. Subsequent additional services, if required, will be authorized in writing based upon a contract addendum. A breakdown of the estimated cost of services for each firm in is shown below and a detailed cost estimate is on the following page. DSU $129,245 SRF $61,840 TKDA $25,700 The estimated cost for all services is $216,785 including $11,075 for expenses. The expenses largely reflect the printing costs associated with numerous copies of materials transmitted to city staff and officials, the Advisory Panel, Technical Committee, Planning and Zoning Board and City Council throughout the process. Optional Service As an optional service, SRF can develop the Transportation Cost Allocation Model referenced under Task 402 for an additional $15,804. City's Responsibilities The proposed City responsibilities are: • Providing electronic copies where available of the existing plans, ordinances and studies relevant to the planning process. Having this information readily available in an electronic format is an assumption of our cost estimate. • Providing digital parcel or ownership data, as available. • Making and distributing copies of documents produced during the planning process including draft plans, alternatives, graphics and other documents as necessary. • Notification, mailings, and meeting invitations to Advisory Panel and Technical Committee members, the Planning and Zoning Board, and the City Council. This estimate also assumes that the following information is provided to DSU by the city in a ready -to -use GIS format. If any part of the information needs to be revised or modified by DSU in order to be used in the planning process, it will be considered additional service and billed to the city in addition to the estimated budget. 1. Current City Boundary 2. Current City Parcel Base with Assessor's Database 3. Current City Roadway System with Road Names 4. Current City Surface Water Inventory (Lakes, Rivers, Ponds, Streams, Drainage Courses) 14 toL '1r`• DSU City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal 5. City Wetland Inventory (If other than the NWI) 6. Boundary of Areas that are Sewered and Areas that are Unsewered in the City 7. Existing Land Use Inventory (Initial Version) 8. Public Facilities Inventory (Municipal Facilities, Schools, Municipal Parks and Trails, any Historical or otherwise Significant or Protected Sites) 9. Regional Parks, Trails, Park Reserves, Special Recreational Features 10. Current City Zoning Designations and any Overlay, PUD layers 11. City Natural Resources Inventory 12. Any Pending Development Plats DSU assumes that all additional information related to Transportation and Water Resources Management sections of the plan will be provided to SRF and TKDA. If needed, DSU will obtain such information in a ready -to -use GIS format from these consultants. Modifications or revisions to such information will be the responsibility of these consultants or as additional services to the city. 15 City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Proposal Cost Estimate July 18, 2006 Phase 1: Inventory and Analysis Task Desorption Task 100 Project Initiation with City Coundl • Process, Roles and Responsibilities 1,520 500 540 2,560 Task 101 TC Project Initiation Meeting 700 500 540 1,740 Task 102 Meet with Met Council Staff to Identify Regional Issues 700 350 540 1,590 Task 103 Land Use, Regional Planning Designation 5,370 - 5,370 Task 104 Demographics, forecasts 1,890 - 1,890 Task 105 Market Analysis 4,000 - - 4,000 Task 106 Housing 665 - 665 Task 107 Natural Resources 930 -- 930 Task 108 Water Resources (Wastewater, Water Supply, Surface Water) 2,500 - 2,500 Task 109 T portation (Roads, Transit, Bike & Ped Facilities, & Aviation) - 5,000 5,000 Task 110 Community Facilities 1,580 - - 1,580 Task 111 Prepare Draft Background Report 3,725 1,500 1,481 6,706 Task 112 TC - Review Background Report 1,200 540 1,740 Task 113 Joint PC & CC Wksp - Background Report 2,280 540 2,820 DSU 7KDA SRF Total Cost Phase 1 Subtotal 24,560 5,350 9,181 39,091 Phase 2: Goals & Policies Task Desorption Task 200 AP - Initiation Meeting - Process, Roles & Responsibilities, Badground Report, 4,590 540 5,480 & Visioning Results 350 Tad 201 AP - Issues Forum 1,900 540 2,440 Task 202 Prepare Draft Goals & Policies 4,730 1,000 1,000 6,730 Task 203 TC - Review Draft Goals & Policies 1,190 - 1,190 Tad 204 AP - Review Goals & Policies 1,190 - 1,190 Tad 205 Joint PC & CC Wksp - Review Goals & Policies 3,040 - 540 3,580 Phase 2 Subtotal Phase 3: Alternatives Task Description Task 300 Prepare Aiternatives - Land Use, Staging, Growth Management, Transportation 16,640 1,350 2,620 20,610 12,360 26,858 01,21B 2,000 Task 301 TC - Review Alternatives 1,200 .. 540 1,740 Task 302 Revise Alternatives 3,250 S00 5,000 8,750 Task 303 AP- Review Alternatives 1,340 540 1,880 Task 300 CC Wksp- Review Alternatives 2,290 540 2,830 Task 305 Revise Alternatives 1,935 Task 306 TC - Review Alternatives/Pre for 500 540 2,500 Alternatives/Prepare Open House 1, %0 - 540 2,500 Task 307 AP /Public Open House - Alternatives 3,080 250 540 3,870 Task 308 PC Review Alternatives - Recommended Preferred Alternative 1,330 250 540 2,120 Task 309 CC Review Alternatives - Select Preferred Alternative 1,670 540 2,210 Phase 3 Subtotal 30,415 3,500 36,178 70,093 Phase 4: Prepare Draft Comprehensive Plan Task Task 400 Vision, Goals and Policies 695 - 695 Task 401 Land Use & Growth Management 5,400 5,400 Task 402 Transportation (Roads, Transit, Bike & Ped Facilities, 6 Aviation) - - 6,466 6,466 Task 403 Water Resources (Wastewater, Water Supply, Surface Water) • 9,800 - 9,800 Task 404 Community Facilities 770 - - 770 Task 405 Parks, Open Space and Natural Areas 3,720 - 3,720 Task 406 Implementation 3,270 - - 3,270 Task 407 TC - Review Draft Plan 1,190 BOO 540 2,530 Task 406 AP - Review Draft Plan 1,340 800 540 2,680 Task 409 PC Workshop - Review Draft Plan 3,110 .. 540 3,650 Task 410 Revise Draft Plan 3,210 - 540 3,750 Task 411 Open Xause /PC Public Hexing 3,630 - 540 4,170 Task 412 City found! Workshop 1,870 .. .. 1,870 Task 413 City Council - Accept Plan & Authorize Distribution to Reviewing Jurisdictions 1,520 1,520 Phase 4 Subtotal 29,725 11,400 9,166 50,291 Phase 5: 510 -Month Adjacent Jurisdictions, School District, Watershed District, & Met Council (informal) review Task Task 500 Submit to Jurisdicions and Met Council for 6 -month Review Period 1,430 Task 501 Meetings with Jurisdictions to Review & 0160..s Draft Plan 2,100 1,500 Task 502 Respond to Comments/Recommend Revisions, if necessary 1,810 1,600 Task 503 PC - Recommend Approval 1,660 Task 504 CC - Preliminary Approval, contingent an Met Council review 1,520 Task 505 Prepare and Submit Plan to Met Council for Review 630 Phase 5 Subtotal 540 1,000 1,430 4,140 4,410 1,660 1,520 630 9,150 3,100 1,540 13,790 Phase 6: Met Council Formal Review & Final Plan Adoption Task Task 600 Meetings (2) with Met Council Staff 1,050 400 1,080 2,530 Task 601 Respond to Met Council Comments 4,100 600 1,000 5,700 'Task 602 Attend Met Council Community Development Meeting 420 420 Task 603 Attend Met Council Meeting 420 - 420 Task 604 Finalize Plan 1,860 .. - 1,860 Task 605 CC Final Plan Adoption 905 - 905 Phase 65ubtotal 8,755 1,000 2,080 11,835 Subtotal 119,245 25,700 60,765 205,710 Reimbursables 10,000 - 1,075 11,075 Grand Total 129,245 25,700 61,840 216,785 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Cl 0 3 0 0 TI 0 0 rD 0. IL Z 0 VNf • le1 oui1 o 3.1 0 = < = N 'muddy B nnainad 0 0 0 76 m N D ro S 3 01 fD a, W 0 0 0 0 D o = or = �c` H 0) A = N 0_ in 0 3 n 0 d N Select Citizen Visioning Committee Q ro SP S n' C N til N (D (D p' N = n 3 �. 9 0+ N 0 m W Phase 4 Desired Outcomes 900? JaquaanoN LO0Z 4)aeW 8002 AJenuer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project Team and Resumes 1 1 John Shardlow, AICP 1 President and Director of Planning I .1V VL 71 F DSU I Experience Mr. Shardlow has extensive and wide ranging project experience serving clients in both the public and private sectors. He has frequently been called upon to lead multi - disciplinary teams of consultants in completing large, complicated planning projects. His skills include comprehensive I and community planning; project planning for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional developments; and preparation of redevelopment plans, tax - increment financing plans, subdivision regulations, and environmental assessments. He also frequently provides expert testimony on matters related to planning. I • Planning Consultant for the City of Burnsville and many others throughout Minnesota, responsible for a wide range of planning, zoning and development issues, including the award winning Burnsville Heart of the City project, all of the comprehensive planning, zoning, environmental review and testimony associated with the Black Dog Amphitheater. • St. Cloud Area Joint Planning District Plan. Principal in charge of the landmark St. Cloud regional plan that resulted in a joint plan for the five I cities and three counties surrounding St. Cloud. • Primary author of The High Cost of Sprawl: Urban Land Supply Analysis and Recommendations for Managing Growth ", prepared for the Builders Association of the Twin Cities. Continuing efforts on behalf of the Builders Association in regard to future growth options for the Twin Cities, and expansion of the MUSA. I • NW Quadrant Redevelopment Project, City of St. Anthony Village. Principal in charge of this "smart growth" Twin Cities project. This is the first of the opportunity sites to be completed and it is the only one currently proceeding into the development stage. • Project Manager for St. Cloud Comprehensive Plan which emphasized growth management, orderly extension of utilities, coordination of multiple jurisdictions, and land use policies. Recipient of MnAPA Distinguished Planning Project Award, 1996. I • Twin Cities Army Ammunition Property. Currently leading a team of consultants in master planning the largest undeveloped site in Ramsey County. This superfund site is being remediated and planned to accommodate a new sustainable, mixed use, transit oriented neighborhood in Arden Hills, Minnesota. • Master Development Coordinator for Roseville School District 623. Infill development of a 78 -acre site originally purchased for school use, but I under development as 60 townhouses and 79 single family residences. Coordination of planning, design, environmental clean -up, construction, builder team, and project marketing. • Gravel Mining Area Master Plan, Maple Grove. Project Manager responsible for coordinating a multi- disciplinary team in the preparation of a master plan and an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) to guide the development of the 2,000 acre gravel mining area in Maple Grove. I Project consists of 3.5 million square feet of commercial, 12.5 million square feet office industrial and over 5,000 housing units. Responsible for all environmental review, comprehensive planning, state and county approvals and permits, and designing and implementing the City's development review and approval process. • Mall of America Expansion, Met Center Property. Prepared plans to assist the owners of the Mall of America in evaluating the development I potential for the Met Center property. Plans included a skyway connection to the Mall of America, extensive additional retail space, a convention center and several hundred hotel rooms. • Shakopee 500, East Dean Lake PUD, Shakopee, MN. Project manager responsible for coordinating team in preparation of master plan for the development of 500 acres of commercial and 1,500 acres of mixed residential use adjacent to the Shakopee bypass and the southern end of the I new Hwy 18 bridge crossing. Responsible for coordinating comprehensive plan and MUSA expansion approval, environmental review and PUD approval. Mr. Shardlow is also a faculty member of the Government Training Service, leading seminars in comprehensive planning, planned unit development, I and advanced planning techniques. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners, the American Planning Association, Minnesota Planning Association, and past president of the Minnesota chapter of the Community Association Institute. He is a past President of the Sensible Land Use Coalition. He currently serves on the Executive Committee of the Twin Cities Chapter of the Urban Land Institute (ULI). 1 Education Bachelor of Science, University of Minnesota, Bachelor of Landscape Architechture, University of Minnesota 1 1 Ciara Schlichting, AICP Senior Planner Experience Ms. Schlichting joined DSU in 2001 after working as a Planner for the Metropolitan Council's department of comprehensive planning /technical assistance. Ms. Schlichting is a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and the American Planning Association (APA). At DSU, Ms. Schlichting assists communities with a broad range of planning projects. Examples of projects in which she has been involved with include: • Environmental and Natural Resource Planning, As DSU's environmental expert, Ciara brings a variety of natural resource planning experience to clients. She has conducted natural resource - related planning for Lake City, St. Cloud, Hutchinson, Lino Lakes, Martin County, Anoka County, the USDA Forest Services and the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs. • Environmental Review, Project coordinator for and contributor to numerous environmental review documents including the Hutchinson Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), which was the first AUAR based on a community's Comprehensive Plan. Taught a class session at the University of Minnesota regarding Minnesota's Environmental Review Program. • River Corridor Planning, Assisted local communities in updating Mississippi River Critical Area Corridor Plans and creating plans that conformed to the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area Comprehensive Management Plan. • Wetland Planning, Assisted Martin County with developing a wetland function and values assessment methodology and a Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management Plan. • Lake Management Planning, Assisted five lake associations in greater Minnesota in the development of comprehensive lake management plans. Authored the "Conducting a Property Owners Survey" chapter of the publication, Sustainable Lakes Planning Workbook: A Lake Management Model (2000). • Open Space Planning, Assisted Anoka County in assessing the intrinsic suitability of large undeveloped open spaces for natural resource preservation or development. • Comprehensive Planning, Assisted the City of Crosslake with updating the Environmental and Lake Management components of its Comprehensive Plans. Assisted the City of Isanti with updating their Comprehensive Plan. Provided technical assistance to many metropolitan communities updating their comprehensive plans to satisfy metropolitan planning requirements. • City Planning, Assisted the City of Vadnais Heights and City of Columbia Heights with day -to -day planning activities. Reviewed site plans, variances, plats, and lot split applications. Education Master of Science in Natural Resource Science and Managment, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Subfield: Planning, Politics, and Administration Bachelor of Science in Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Minnesota - College of Natural Resources v v' '� rc DSU Brendon Slotterback ' Planner 1 1 ' Experience Mr. Slotterback joined DSU in October of 2005. Before joining DSU, he was pursuing a degree in Urban and Regional Planning from the University of Minnesota. He also worked as an intern for a planning advocacy non - profit in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Examples of projects he has been involved with include: • Regional Planning. Currently working on an evaluation of the implementation of the Saint ' Cloud Area Joint Planning District Plan. The goal of this work is to judge the effectiveness of the District Plan which serves as a regional plan for Sherburne, Stearns and Benton County, as well as five cities in the Saint Cloud Metropolitan area. He analyzes County and City zoning ordinances, comprehensive plans and inter - governmental cooperation. ' • Comprehensive Planning. Currently working as part of a consultant team for the City of Woodbury to update land use designations for the city's vacant commercial and industrial land. This update involved a study of current market demand for land types in the city, research on ' mixed use standards and ordinances and an extensive public participation process. • Environmental Planning. Currently working on an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) in Sartell, Minnesota. This work includes writing and editing the Environmental Review ' document, assisting in the facilitation of public meetings and researching mitigation strategies and other data. • Consultant Neighborhood Planner. Worked as part of a consultant team to develop a ' Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan for Highland Park in Saint Paul, Minnesota. Charged by the city to update their Comprehensive Plan, Highland Park enlisted the help of students at the Humphrey Institute to implement an effective public participation process, compile neighborhood data, distill issues and draft a plan that would guide the neighborhood into the future. ' Transportation, pedestrian- oriented design, and affordable housing were some of the significant issues this team had to address. ' • Research Intern. Working for 1000 Friends of New Mexico, he researched the use of subdivision ordinances in many of the counties of New Mexico. This research was a first step in determining the extent of the use of "exemptions" to the ordinance and the effect this use had the counties ability to plan for and manage growth. ' Professional Organizations Member American Planning Association (APA) ' Member Urban Land Institute (ULI) Education ' Masters Candidate — Urban and Regional Planning University of Minnesota Graduate School, Twin Cities Bachelor of Arts in Political Science Minor: Philosophy University of Wisconsin Eau Claire 1 1 ■.1 Z. rc DSU Michael Martin Manner ' Experience Mr. Martin joined DSU in February of 2006. Mr. Martin recently received his Masters in Urban and Regional Planning from the University of Minnesota. He also completed internships with the ' City of Saint Paul City Council and the City of Minneapolis' Community Planning and Economic Development department. Examples of projects he has been involved with include: • Comprehensive Planning. Currently working on finalizing the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Owatonna, Minnesota. He calculated and updated population projections using the latest estimates provided by the Minnesota State Demographic Center. He is also designing the format for the final draft of the plan to be presented in. e • City Planning. Worked on a parking study for the City of Burnsville, Minnesota. The purpose of this study was to determine if the amount of parking the city was currently requiring was too much. He developed recommendations after comparing the city's parking requirements against other comparable cities in the United States and national parking studies. ' • Master Planning. Worked as part of a consultant team to develop a master plan for the University of Minnesota's Academic Health Center. Students from the Humphrey Institute worked to develop a master plan that addressed the Academic Health Center's need for more research, clinical, and ' teaching facilities. The plan was shaped to effectively plan for public spaces that provide a healthy and healing environment, connections to the nearby Mississippi River and address transportation issues. ' • Research Intern. While working for the City Council in Saint Paul, Minnesota, he researched auto - oriented businesses in the city. The research included looking at the city's zoning code, spatial location of the businesses and identifying locations in the city where the businesses were concentrating. This research was a first step in determining what types of zoning changes needed ' to be made to mitigate the negative externalities of the uses. He also provided policy analysis and research on a range of topics for the Council. ' Professional Organizations Member American Planning Association (APA) Member Urban Land Institute (ULI) ' Education Masters in Urban and Regional Planning ' University of Minnesota Graduate School, Twin Cities Bachelor of Science in Journalism Minor: Political Science St. Cloud State University 1 1 CON, I IING GROUP, INC. Brian Shorten Senior Associate Areas of Expertise • Local Transportation Plans • Public Participation • Intermodal Transportation Planning • Rail Impact Mitigation • Corridor Planning • Interjurisdictional Coordination • Plan Implementation • Grantsmanship • Growth Management • Intelligent Transportation Systems • Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning • Travel Demand Management • Context Sensitive Design Education B.S., University of Minnesota, 1974 Training Context Sensitive Design, 2004 Professional Affiliations Mn /DOT Interregional Corridor Technical Advisory Committee Mn /DOT Access Management Steering Committee Minnesota and North Dakota State Transportation Plan Steering Committees Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations - Policy Committee Member Minnesota Guidestar ITS Board of Directors TRB Small MPO -ISTEA Research Committee Mr. Shorten has more than 30 years of diverse planning experience. He joined SRF after serving as the Executive Director of the Fargo- Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments for 16 years. Mr. Shorten has extensive transportation planning experience in both urban and rural settings. His substantial knowledge covers a wide range of transportation elements, including corridor and access management, transit development, incident response, bicycle and pedestrian trail systems, and county, city and metropolitan area planning. Project Experience Brian served as the project manager for numerous transportation planning studies including: • Benton County CSAH 29/8 Corridor Study (2005) • St. Joseph North Corridor and Stearns County CSAH 2 Realignment Study (2005) • Eagan Transportation Infrastructure Needs Analysis (2005) • Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Transportation Plan (2005) • Fargo 23rd /28th Avenue South Bridge Corridor Study (2005) • Rail Quiet Zone Assessments for St. Louis Park, Minnetonka, and Northfield, Minnesota (2005) • Prior Lake Transportation Plan and Infrastructure Feasibility (2005) • I -39 Alternate Route Study, Wisconsin Department of Transportation (2004) • Goodhue County Transportation Plan (2004) • Minnesota Department of Transportation TH 336 /Clay County CSAH 11 Corridor Management Plan (2004) • Rapid City Transit Development Plan (2004) • Fargo- Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2004) • River Falls Transportation Plan (2003) • Fargo - Moorhead Metropolitan Bicycle /Pedestrian Plan (2000) • Fargo- Moorhead Metropolitan Transit Development Plans (2001) • Fargo- Moorhead Metropolitan Comprehensive ITS Plan (1998) Other Professional Experience While serving as the Executive Director for the Fargo- Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments, Mr. Shorten: • Secured cooperation from more than 90 elected officials and senior staff in implementing Council policies and program directives. • Was extensively involved in more than 50 corridor studies, 10 project concept reports, 12 metropolitan intermodal transportation plans and three interstate access justification evaluations. CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Brian Shorten Senior Associate • Recognized for outstanding best practices concerning traffic modeling, Geographic Information Systems, Intelligent Transportation Systems, corridor preservation and sustainable transportation activities. • Secured more than $75 million in federal and state funds for transportation projects. Prior to working for the Fargo- Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments, Mr. Shorten was the Executive Director of the Southwest Regional Development Commission in Slayton, Minnesota and the Director of Community Planning and Development for the Black Hills Council of Local Governments in Rapid City, South Dakota. Awards and Recognition • 2002 Fargo- Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments Certificate of Honor • 2001 Intelligent Transportation Systems Minnesota Outreach Appreciation and Commendation Award oni CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Stephen Wilson Senior Associate Areas of Expertise • Travel Forecasting • Transportation Planning • Transit Planning • Transportation Needs Analysis Education M.S., University of Wisconsin — Madison B.A., University of Wisconsin — Madison Professional Affiliations Institute of Transportation Engineers Transportation Research Board Mr. Wilson has extensive travel demand modeling and transportation planning experience throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area and the State of Minnesota. Prior to joining SRF, he was a Transportation Forecast Analyst /Planner with the Metropolitan Council, where he was a key figure in the development of the 1990 Twin Cities Travel Behavior Inventory and travel demand models. Forecast Modeling for Environmental Studies • TH 62/I -35W Crosstown Commons Reconstruction, Minneapolis and Richfield, Minnesota • Mississippi River Crossing Cumulative Impact Study, Sherburne and Wright Counties, Minnesota • Ayd Mill Road Phase I and Phase II Draft EIS and Scoping Process, Saint Paul, Minnesota • St. Croix River Crossing Supplemental EIS Travel Forecasts, Stillwater, Minnesota and Town of St. Joseph, Wisconsin • I-494 Preliminary Design and Final Environmental Impact Statement • TH 41 Over the Minnesota River Scoping Study Forecast Modeling for Roadway Design Projects • I- 494/TH 169 Interchange, Bloomington, Minnesota • I- 494/TH 61 (Wakota Bridge) Traffic Study, Southeast Twin Cities, Minnesota • 2001 Transportation Performance Audit, Metropolitan Council • CSAH 32 Corridor Study • Northeast Wright County Subarea Study • I -394 MnPASS Express Lanes (with Wilbur Smith Associates) Forecast Modeling for Land Use Projects • TH 610 East and West Alternative Urban Areawide Reviews (AUAR), Maple Grove, Minnesota • Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plan • I -35W North Subarea Analysis • Gravel Mining Area AUAR, Maple Grove, Minnesota • Northwest Woodbury Transportation Study, Woodbury, Minnesota • Ground Access Impacts of Alternative Airport Locations, Twin Cities • Mall of America Phase II Environmental Impact Statement, Bloomington, Minnesota Model Development and Special Projects • Twin Cities Metropolitan Collar County Travel Demand Modeling, Minnesota Department of Transportation • Minneapolis Downtown Baseline Study, Minneapolis, Minnesota • Fargo-Moorhead Forecast Model Peer Review • External Origin - Destination Survey, St. Cloud, Minnesota • Metropolitan Council Freight Model CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Stephen Wilson Senior Associate • Downtown Traffic Forecasting and Modeling Study, Saint Paul, Minnesota • Bismarck -Mandan Travel Demand Model, Bismarck and Mandan, North Dakota • Congestion /Road Pricing Study, Twin Cities • Twin Cities Regional Model Enhancements and Feedback /Convergence Mechanis, Twin Cities, Minnesota Transit Forecast Modeling • 2030 LRT Forecast Update • Minnesota Intercity Bus Needs Study • Highway 61 /Red Rock Commuter Rail Corridor Land Use and Transportation Study, Cottage Grove, Minnesota • Riverview Corridor Phase I Study • Southwest Corridor Light Rail Transit Forecast Review and Update, Hennepin County, Minnesota • Central Corridor Alternatives Analysis Ridership Forecasts, Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota • Hiawatha Corridor Light Rail Transit Forecasts and Federal Section 5309 New Starts, Minneapolis and Bloomington, Minnesota • Twin Cities Transit Network Update • Bottineau Boulevard BRT Forecasts, Hennepin County, Minnesota Transportation Plan Experience • City of Chaska, Minnesota • City of Savage, Minnesota • City of Plymouth, Minnesota • City of Champlin, Minnesota • Scott County, Minnesota • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • City of Eden Prairie Comprehensive Plan Traffic Forecasts, Minnesota • City of Maple Grove, Minnesota • City of Eagan, Minnesota • City of Lakeville, Minnesota 0-1 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Jacqueline Corkle, AICP Associate Areas of Expertise • Transportation Planning • Strategic and Policy Planning • Public Outreach Coordination/ Presentations • Land Use Planning • Research • Comprehensive Planning Education Master of Planning, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota B.A., Political Science and Public Administration, Augustana College, Rock Island, Illinois Certification American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Affiliations American Planning Association Women's Transportation Seminar Phi Beta Kappa Society Continuing Education "Systematic Development of Informed Consent" Hans Bleiker, Institute of Participatory Management Practices Ms. Corkle's experience focuses primarily on transportation and strategic planning. She has been heavily involved in developing the Interregional Corridor (IRC) System and the policy guidance for IRC plan development and management studies. Additionally, Ms. Corkle was a key participant in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Statewide Transportation Plan, Moving Minnesota 2003, including develop policy guidance to achieve this performance -based plan. Project Experience • Minnesota Department of Transportation Statewide Transportation Plan (All Modes Policy Document) • Minnesota Department of Transportation Statewide Freight Plan • I -35 Interregional Corridor Study, Twin Cities to Hinckley, Minnesota • 2003 Mankato Area Transportation and Planning Study (MATAPS), Mankato, Minnesota • Minnesota Guidestar Implementation Plan, Statewide • Minnesota Guidestar Action Plan, Statewide • Minnesota Guidestar Strategic Plan Update, Statewide • Interregional Corridor Plan, Minnesota • Interregional Corridors: A Guide for Plan Development and Corridor Management (Minnesota) • Southwest Arterial Alignment Study, Stearns County, Minnesota • Ring Road Study, Hutchinson, Minnesota • TH 169 Interregional Corridor Study, Twin Cities to Mankato, Minnesota • I -35 Interregional Corridor Study, Twin Cities to Hinckley, Minnesota • CSAH 32 Extension Study, Dakota County, Minnesota • Local Road Research Board Reports for Traffic Signs, Pavement Markings, Rumble Strips, Utility Relocation and Traffic Calming • Carver County Transportation Plan, Carver County, Minnesota • Blue Earth County Transportation Plan, Blue Earth County, Minnesota • Park Plan Section of the Plymouth Comprehensive Plan, Plymouth, Minnesota • TH 14 Access Study, Mankato to Eagle Lake, Minnesota • Birch Street Bridge Replacement Study, Eau Claire, Wisconsin • TH 41 River Crossing Scoping Study, Chaska, Minnesota • Federal Funding Applications, Twin Cities, Minnesota • Freight Generators and Connectors Study Other Professional Experience • Authored ordinances, enforced zoning ordinances and city codes, prepared grant applications and authored section of comprehensive plan for Belle Plaine, Minnesota. • Authored parks, trails and open space sections and conducted research for the transportation and parks sections of the Carver County Comprehensive Plan. piTi CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Robert Diedrich Senior GIS Specialist Areas of Expertise: • Geographic Information Systems (GIS) • ArcGIS 9.x • ArcView • MapObjects • Cartography • Dynamic Segmentation • Data Acquisition /Sharing • Floodplain Mapping Education B.A., Urban Studies, University of Minnesota, 1991 Professional Affiliations American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Mr. Diedrich has 13 years of experience in a wide variety of GIS applications, including spatial and non - spatial data, development analysis and GPS data collection. He provides mapping and analysis solutions for transportation projects and is responsible for digital data acquisition and coordination, base mapping, database management and spatial analysis. Using State Trunk Highway routable networks, he uses dynamics segmentation to classify roads. He also maps origin and destination patterns for travel forecasting efforts. In addition, he applies new GIS tools for digital orthophotography analysis using state -of- the -art selective image decompression developed by Lizard Tech. Project Experience • I -35W Tunnel Study, Minneapolis, Minnesota • Comfort Lake - Forest Lake Watershed District Floodplain Mapping • Twin Cities Travel Time Reliability Study, Minnesota Department of Transportation • Minnesota Statewide Freight Plan, Minnesota Department of Transportation • TH 41 Over the Minnesota River EIS, Scott County/Carver County, Minnesota • Hutchinson Beltway Transportation Study, Hutchinson, Minnesota • St. Cloud Beltway Transportation Study, St. Cloud, Minnesota • Transportation Plan Forecasts, Scott County, Minnesota • TH 52 Subarea Interregional Corridor Study Base Mapping and Traffic Analysis, Goodhue and Olmsted Counties, Minnesota • TH 169 Interregional Corridor Study Dynamic Segmentation, Origin and Destination Patterns, Scott, LeSueur, Sibley, Nicollet and Blue Earth Counties, Minnesota • Traffic Forecasts, Bismarck, North Dakota • Glenwood Avenue Parking Study, Minneapolis, Minnesota • South Area Study, Victoria, Minnesota • Variable Message Signs and Statewide Mapping, Wisconsin Department of Transportation • TH 14 Corridor Study, Southern Minnesota • Minnesota Department of Transportation Ramp Meter Study, Minneapolis /Saint Paul Metropolitan Area, Minnesota • Advanced Traveler Information System, Wisconsin Department of Transportation • Bismarck Transit Study, Bismarck, North Dakota • I -494 Environmental Impact Statement Travel Study, Western and Southern Twin Cities, Minnesota • Rice County Transit Study, Rice County, Minnesota • Central Corridor Study, Minneapolis /Saint Paul, Minnesota CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Stephanie Erickson Transportation Planner Areas of Expertise • Transportation Planning • Land Use Planning • Environment and Infrastructure Planning • GIS for Policy and Planning Analysis Education Master of Urban and Regional Planning, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, 2006 B.A., French Studies and Political Science, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, 2003 Study Abroad Program in Paris, France, Institute for the International Education of Students, Spring 2002 Ms. Erickson joined SRF after completing her masters degree in urban and regional planning. She has studied a wide range of transportation planning and land use planning disciplines, and her coursework included real -world application of these skills. Project Experience Highlights of Ms. Erickson's coursework include: • Using GIS and environmental planning principles to create a 15 -year development plan for Washington County. • Using SPSS software and several statistical techniques to analyze various public policies. • Studying spatial analysis techniques, including mapping and projection basics, database development and management, suitability analysis, location studies, and US Census housing and population analysis. • Using GIS, local planning documents, urban design and transportation planning principles, zoning analysis, benefit -cost analysis, parking requirements and local traffic analysis to design a plan for a land bridge over a Twin Cities freeway. • Studying land use law principles, including takings issues, nuisance law, zoning controls, site plan compliance and PUD standards. • Analyzing demographic changes in the metro area and used various techniques to project population changes. • Designing and conducting a survey concerning travel behavior of students. • Using census data, GIS and neighborhood revitalization theories to conduct housing inventory and make housing recommendations for a local neighborhood. • Studying site planning issues, techniques, process and government review process through preparation and presentation of a site plan. • Using a variety of public involvement tools and techniques to respond to an RFP for a planning and participation process. • Exploring issues related to transit technologies, transit- oriented development, the role of transit in multi -modal transportation systems and transit management. • Developing an understanding of the comprehensive planning process and creating best land use management practices to encourage physical activity for Ramsey County and the City of Falcon Heights. • Incorporating an existing conditions analysis, market research and community input to create a master plan for Penn Avenue in Richfield. Ms. Erickson served as a planning intern for the Dakota County Planning Department. Her work included: • Obtaining public input for the County's transit plan • Writing official mapping ordinance • Writing portions of the County's transit plan • Creating and maintaining a GIS database and map of active and proposed County development projects put4 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Stephanie Erickson Transportation Planner • Reviewing plat applications to ensure compliance with access spacing and right of way guidelines • Assisting in code enforcement activities in shoreland and floodplain areas of the County • Preparing land use maps and traffic analysis materials for Plat Commission meetings • Researching planning and zoning issues for the Physical Development Committee • Writing portions of TEA -21 grant applications to obtain more than $1 million of funding for bicycle trails • Writing guidelines for development of township mining ordinances Ms. Erickson was a teaching assistant for the undergraduate planning course at the Humphrey Institute Department of Planning. In this role, she: • Acted as lead discussant in the head professor's absence • Responded to student inquiries concerning assignments and course topics Ms. Erickson served as a graduate research assistant for the Humphrey Institute's State and Local Policy Program, where she: • Updated Mn /DOT's public involvement manual, Hear Every Voice • Produced maps with GIS software for presentations and reports • Conducted literature reviews for various transportation- related research topics 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Experience 1 1 1 I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review Lino Lakes, MN DSU led a consultant team including Applied Ecological Services, URS, The 106 Group and TKDA in the preparation of an AUAR for the I -35E Corridor Area in the City of Lino Lakes. A key strategy of the AUAR Mitigation Plan was the creation of the Conservation Design Framework (CDF) that will guide future development. The CDF conserves wildlife habitat and natural plant communities and provides for multifunctional greenway corridors for wildlife movement, trails, and stormwa- ter management. An Advisory Panel comprised of property owners, citizen boards representatives, and developers served as the primary working group during the course of the research, planning and environ- mental review process. DSU conducted a series of work- shops with the AUAR reviewing agencies. Engaging agency staff early and often during the AUAR process was key to the success of the AUAR as demonstrated in the Draft AUAR comment letters. Anoka County The city has engaged a wide range of stake- holders, including the DNR, in a very effective gathering and exchange of information, leading to a document that is complete and accurate." - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources "The city should be commended for basing the land uses in the DraftAUAR scenarios on its commitment to conserving natural resources and for attempting to balance development with natural resource conservation." - Metropolitan Council City of Hutchinson Comprehensive Plan and AUAR Hutchinson, Minnesota Hutchinson is a city of just over 13,000 people located in northeastern McLeod County in central Minnesota. Hutchinson is roughly 53 miles south of St. Cloud on Highway 15 and 65 miles west of the Twin Cities on Highway 7 currently covering approximately eight square miles. The city contains a wealth of natural resources including the Crow River, streams, lakes, fertile agricultural land, wetlands, and wooded areas. Hutchinson has experienced steady growth over the last half century. As the city continues to grow, keeping up with infrastructure is a challenge, transportation being the largest. Planning for a roadway system that moves people through and around the city has been a major priority of the city. DSU developed a Comprehensive Plan update with a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) consisting of 15 residents, City Staff, elected officials, planning commission, the Economic Development Authority and members of the surrounding townships Joint Planning Board. The PAC successfully gained consensus and developed a successful Land Use Plan and goals and polices to enhance the community. DSU prepared an AUAR based on the updated Land Use Plan. The 17,000 -acre UAR area is the largest AUAR completed in the state and involved the City, four townships and McLeod County. Hassan Valley Township j Hassan Valley. Township 1 1 1 1 St. Cloud Comprehensive Plan Update St. Cloud, Minnesota 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The St. Cloud Comprehensive Plan Update sets forth the basic guiding principals for the future of St. Cloud, one of the largest and fastest - growing areas outside the Twin Cities. The Plan evolved through the interchange of information, analysis and response among the citizens, community leaders, staff and public officials of St. Cloud and surrounding townships in a planning process undertaken from 2001 through 2003. This Plan replaces the city's previous plan completed in 1993, and was necessary both to take into account the considerable growth and change within the community over the past decade, and to implement the St. Cloud Joint Planning District Plan adopted in 2000. The District Plan is the product of a cooperative planning effort involving the five cities of Sartell, Sauk Rapids, St. Cloud, St. Joseph and Waite Park; as well as Benton, Sherburne and Stearns Counties. St. Cloud's growth has, in many places, surpassed the boundaries of the previous Comprehensive Plan, and the city needed a plan to guide development within the city and adjacent areas in a logical and efficient manner and to protect growth and transportation corridors as well as natural resources. The effort developed master plans for several growth areas outside or recently annexed into the city. Planning around and with the numerous wetlands, rock outcroppings, and other natural features has been a main focus of the plan. NEW ISSUES OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JULY 10, 2006 Ratings: Requested from Moody's Investors Service In the opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Bond Counsel for the City, under existing laws, regulations, rulings and decisions, assuming compliance with the covenants set forth in the Resolutions, the interest on the Bonds is not includable in the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes or in taxable net income of individuals, estates or trusts for Minnesota income tax purposes, and is not includable in the computation of the alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and on individuals, trusts and estates under Minnesota law. Interest on the Bonds is includable in the calculation of certain federal and Minnesota taxes imposed on corporations. (See `Tax Exemption" herein.) City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota $2,460,000* General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C (the "Series 2006C Bonds ") $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D (the "Series 2006D Bonds ") (collectively referred to as the "Bonds," the "Obligations" or the "Issues ") (Book Entry Only) Dated Date: August 15, 2006 Interest Due: Each February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 2007 The Bonds will mature as shown on the inside front cover of this Official Statement. Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for any combination of serial bonds and term bonds. Any term bonds will be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption and must conform to the maturity schedules set forth on the inside front cover of this Official Statement. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City pledges its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. Additional sources of security for the Bonds are discussed herein. A separate proposal, for not less than the amounts shown below, must be submitted for each Issue, along with a good faith deposit in the form of a certified or cashier's check, or a Financial Surety Bond, payable to the order of the City. Rates shall be specified in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1% and must be in level or ascending order. The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of True Interest Cost (TIC). Minimum Bid Good Faith Deposit The Series 2006C Bonds $2,432,940 The Series 2006D Bonds 562,020 $24,600 5,700 The City will designate the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" pursuant to Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Bonds will not be subject to the alternative minimum tax for individuals. The Bonds will be issued as fully registered Bonds without coupons and, when issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "). DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds. Individual purchases may be made in book entry form only, in the principal amount of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof. Investors will not receive physical certificates representing their interest in the Bonds purchased. (See "Book Entry System" herein.) U.S. Bank National Association, St. Paul, Minnesota will serve as the registrar (the "Registrar ") for the Bonds. Bonds will be available for delivery at DTC on or about August 23, 2006. Preliminary; subject to change. PROPOSALS RECEIVED: July 24, 2006 (Monday) until 10:30 A.M., Central Time CITY AWARD: July 24, 2006 (Monday) at 6:30 P.M., Central Time © Springsted Further information may be obtained from SPRINGSTED Incorporated, Financial Advisor to the Issuer, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 -2887 (651) 223 -3000 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota $2,460,000* General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C The Series 2006C Bonds will mature February 1 as follows: 2011 $ 30,000 2012 $ 85,000 2013 $125,000 2014 $140,000 2015 $155,000 2016 $170,000 2017 $190,000 2018 $205,000 2021 $270,000 2019 $225,000 2022 $295,000 2020 $250,000 2023 $320,000 The City may elect on February 1, 2017, and on any day thereafter, to prepay the Series 2006C Bonds due on or after February 1, 2018 at a price of par plus accrued interest. The Series 2006C Bonds are also subject to extraordinary redemption as discussed in "THE BONDS — Extraordinary Redemption" herein. $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D The Series 2006D Bonds will mature February 1 as follows: 2008 $50,000 2009 $50,000 2010 $50,000 2011 $50,000 2014 $60,000 2016 $65,000 2012 $55,000 2015 $60,000 2017 $70,000 2013 $60,000 The Series 2006D Bonds will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates. Preliminary; subject to change. For purposes of compliance with Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this document, as the same may be supplemented or corrected by the City from time to time (collectively, the "Official Statement "), may be treated as an Official Statement with respect to the Bonds described herein that is deemed final as of the date hereof (or of any such supplement or correction) by the City, except for the omission of certain information referred to in the succeeding paragraph. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. Any such addendum shall, on and after the date thereof, be fully incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a Proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described in the preceding paragraph in the amount specified in the Terms of Proposal. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a Proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its bid is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. No dealer, broker, salesman or other person has been authorized by the City to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the Bonds, other than as contained in the Official Statement or the Final Official Statement, and if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the City. Certain information contained in the Official Statement and the Final Official Statement may have been obtained from sources other than records of the City and, while believed to be reliable, is not guaranteed as to completeness or accuracy. THE INFORMATION AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION IN THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND THE FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE, AND NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT OR THE FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT NOR ANY SALE MADE UNDER EITHER SUCH DOCUMENT SHALL CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE CITY SINCE THE DATE THEREOF. References herein to laws, rules, regulations, resolutions, agreements, reports and other documents do not purport to be comprehensive or definitive. All references to such documents are qualified in their entirety by reference to the particular document, the full text of which may contain qualifications of and exceptions to statements made herein. Where full texts have not been included as appendices to the Official Statement or the Final Official Statement, they will be furnished on request. Any CUSIP numbers for the Bonds included in the Final Official Statement are provided for convenience of the owners and prospective investors. The CUSIP numbers for the Bonds have been assigned by an organization unaffiliated with the City. The City is not responsible for the selection of the CUSIP numbers and makes no representation as to the accuracy thereof as printed on the Bonds or as set forth in the Final Official Statement. No assurance can be given that the CUSIP numbers for the Bonds will remain the same after the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds. TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe(s) Terms of Proposals: $2,460,000* General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C i -v $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D vi -ix Introductory Statement 1 Related Financing 1 Continuing Disclosure 2 The Bonds 2 The Series 2006C Bonds 5 The Series 2006D Bonds 6 Future Financing 6 Litigation 6 Legality 7 Tax Exemption 7 Bank - Qualified Tax - Exempt Obligations 8 Ratings 8 Financial Advisor 8 Certification 8 City Property Values 9 City Indebtedness 10 City Tax Rates, Levies and Collections 14 Funds on Hand 15 City Investments 15 General Information Concerning the City 16 Governmental Organization and Services 19 Proposed Forms of Legal Opinions Appendix I Continuing Disclosure Certificate Appendix II Summary of Tax Levies, Payment Provisions, and Minnesota Real Property Valuation Appendix III Excerpt of 2005 Annual Financial Statements Appendix IV Proposal Forms Inserted THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $2,460,000* CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX ABATEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2006C (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, July 24, 2006, until 10:30 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 6:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner in which the Proposal is submitted. (a) Sealed Bidding. Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3046 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3046 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. OR (b) Electronic Bidding. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received via PARITY". For purposes of the electronic bidding process, the time as maintained by PARITY® shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY°. Each bidder shall be solely responsible for making necessary arrangements to access PARITY® for purposes of submitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in compliance with the requirements of the Terms of Proposal. Neither the City, its agents nor PARITY shall have any duty or obligation to undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure electronic access to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City, its agents nor PARITY° shall be responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any failure in the proper operation of, or have any liability for any delays or interruptions of or any damages caused by the services of PARITY. The City is using the services of PARITY® solely as a communication mechanism to conduct the electronic bidding for the Bonds, and PARITY® is not an agent of the City. If any provisions of this Terms of Proposal conflict with information provided by PARITY®, this Terms of Proposal shall control. Further information about PARITY®, including any fee charged, may be obtained from: PARITY®, 1359 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, New York 10018 Customer Support: (212) 849 -5000 DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated August 15, 2006, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2007. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 2011 $ 30,000 2012 $ 85,000 2013 $125,000 2014 $140,000 2015 $155,000 2016 $170,000 2017 $190,000 2018 $205,000 2019 $225,000 2020 $250,000 2021 $270,000 2022 $295,000 2023 $320,000 The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any discount taken by the successful bidder will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced. Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial bonds and term bonds. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. In order to designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Years of Term Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form. BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar, which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February 1, 2017, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2018. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. EXTRAORDINARY REDEMPTION The Bonds are subject to extraordinary redemption on any day in whole, but not in part, at a redemption price equal to par, plus accrued interest to the redemption date, upon conveyance, lease or transfer in other mode of the YMCA Project to an entity that is not a qualified 501(c)(3) entity under the Internal Revenue Code of 1987, as amended, or a unit of state or local government, in connection with the foreclosure of the Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Agreement and Assignment of Leases and Rents from the YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, for the benefit of Patriot Bank Minnesota, pursuant to the issuance of the City's Revenue Note (YMCA Project) Series 2006A and Revenue Note (YMCA Project) Series 2006B. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition, the City will pledge tax abatement revenues. The proceeds will be used to finance a joint project between the City and the YMCA of Greater St. Paul pursuant to a development agreement. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not Tess than $2,432,940 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $24,600, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser, will be deposited by the City. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in level or ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and (iii) reject any proposal that the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds that shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Unless compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds has been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for payment. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5), the City will undertake, pursuant to the resolution awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or prior to delivery of the Bonds. OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no - iv - more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 105 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Julie Bartell City Clerk THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $570,000 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2006D (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, July 24, 2006, until 10:30 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 6:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds regardless of the manner in which the Proposal is submitted. (a) Sealed Bidding. Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3046 to Springsted. Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3046 for inclusion in the submitted Proposal. OR (b) Electronic Bidding. Notice is hereby given that electronic proposals will be received via PARITY®. For purposes of the electronic bidding process, the time as maintained by PARITY° shall constitute the official time with respect to all Bids submitted to PARITY°. Each bidder shall be solely responsible for making necessary arrangements to access PARITY® for purposes of submitting its electronic Bid in a timely manner and in compliance with the requirements of the Terms of Proposal. Neither the City, its agents nor PARITY® shall have any duty or obligation to undertake registration to bid for any prospective bidder or to provide or ensure electronic access to any qualified prospective bidder, and neither the City, its agents nor PARITY° shall be responsible for a bidder's failure to register to bid or for any failure in the proper operation of, or have any liability for any delays or interruptions of or any damages caused by the services of PARITY®. The City is using the services of PARITY° solely as a communication mechanism to conduct the electronic bidding for the Bonds, and PARITY° is not an agent of the City. If any provisions of this Terms of Proposal conflict with information provided by PARITY°, this Terms of Proposal shall control. Further information about PARITY°, including any fee charged, may be obtained from: PARITY®, 1359 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, New York 10018 Customer Support: (212) 849 -5000 DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated August 15, 2006, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2007. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 2008 $50,000 2009 $50,000 2010 $50,000 2011 $50,000 2012 $55,000 2013 $60,000 2014 $60,000 2015 $60,000 2016 $65,000 2017 $70,000 Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial bonds and term bonds. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. In order to designate term bonds, the proposal must specify "Years of Term Maturities" in the spaces provided on the Proposal Form. BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond, representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "), New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants. Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the Bonds with DTC. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar, which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The Bonds will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition, the City will pledge net revenues of the City's water and sewer funds. The proceeds will be used to finance various utility improvement projects within the City. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not Tess than $562,020 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $5,700, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany the proposal. If a Financial Surety - vii - Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The Deposit received from the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser, will be deposited by the City. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in level or ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and (iii) reject any proposal that the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser through DTC in New York, New York. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate. On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds that shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Unless compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds has been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for payment. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5), the City will undertake, pursuant to the resolution awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or prior to delivery of the Bonds. - viii - OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 50 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Julie Bartell City Clerk OFFICIAL STATEMENT CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA $2,460,000* GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX ABATEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2006C $570,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2006D (BOOK ENTRY ONLY) INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT This Official Statement contains certain information relating to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "City" or the "Issuer") and its issuance of $2,460,000* General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C (the "Series 2006C Bonds ") and $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D (the "Series 2006D Bonds "), collectively referred to as the "Bonds," the "Obligations," or the "Issues." The Bonds are general obligations of the City for which the City pledges its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. Additional sources of security for the Bonds are discussed herein. Inquiries may be directed to Mr. Alan Rolek, Finance Director, City of Lino Lakes, 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182, or by telephoning (651) 982 -2400. Inquiries may also be made to Springsted Incorporated, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -2887, or by telephoning (651) 223 -3000. If information of a specific legal nature is desired, requests may be directed to Mr. Stephen Bubul, Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, 470 U.S. Bank Plaza, 200 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, Bond Counsel, (612) 337 -9300. RELATED FINANCING On June 28, 2006 the City issued its $3,500,000 Revenue Note (YMCA Project), Series 2006A and its $500,000 Revenue Note (YMCA Project), Series 2006B (collectively, the "Notes "). The Notes are conduit bonds secured solely from loan payments from the YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "YMCA ") and a first mortgage on the YMCA facility. The Notes are not a general or moral obligation of the City and the taxing power or general assets or revenues of the City are not pledged to the payment of the Notes. The proceeds of the Notes were provided to the YMCA to partially finance the construction of an approximately 42,000- square -foot recreational facility to be located at 7690 Village Drive, Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "Project ") and the acquisition and installation of equipment for the Project. The proceeds of the Series 2006C Bonds will also be used to finance a portion of the Project. The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the principal amount of the Series 2006C Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the event the principal amount of the Series 2006C Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any discount taken by the successful bidder will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the principal amount of the Series 20060 Bonds is increased or reduced. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE In order to assist the Underwriters in complying with SEC Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time, and official interpretations thereof (the "Rule "), pursuant to the Award Resolutions, the City has entered into an undertaking (the "Undertaking ") for the benefit of holders including beneficial owners of the Bonds to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the City to certain information repositories annually, and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain events enumerated in the Rule to certain information repositories or the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and to any state information depository. The specific nature of the Undertaking, as well as the information to be contained in the annual report or the notices of material events is set forth in the Continuing Disclosure Certificate to be executed and delivered by the City at the time the Bonds are delivered in substantially the form attached hereto as Appendix II. The City has never failed to comply in all material respects with any previous undertakings under the Rule to provide annual reports or notices of material events. A failure by the City to comply with the Undertaking will not constitute an event of default on the Bonds (although holders will have any available remedy at law or in equity). Nevertheless, such a failure must be reported in accordance with the Rule and must be considered by any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer before recommending the purchase or sale of the Bonds in the secondary market. Consequently, such a failure may adversely affect the transferability and liquidity of the Bonds and their market price. THE BONDS General Description The Bonds are dated August 15, 2006 and will mature annually each February 1, as set forth on the inside front cover of this Official Statement. The Bonds are being issued in book entry form. Interest on the Bonds is payable February 1, 2007 and semi - annually thereafter on August 1 and February 1. Interest will be payable to the holder (initially Cede & Co.) registered on the books of the Registrar as of the fifteenth day of the calendar month next preceding such interest payment date. Principal of and interest on the Bonds will be paid as described in the section "Book Entry System." U.S. Bank National Association, Saint Paul, Minnesota, will serve as Registrar for the Bonds and the City will pay for registration services. Optional Redemption The City may elect on February 1, 2017, and on any day thereafter, to prepay the Series 2006C Bonds due on or after February 1, 2018. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all of the Series 2006C Bonds of a maturity are called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. The Series 2006D Bonds will not be subject to payment in advance of their respected stated maturity dates. 2 Extraordinary Redemption The Series 2006C Bonds are subject to extraordinary redemption on any day in whole, but not in part, at a redemption price equal to par, plus accrued interest to the redemption date, upon conveyance, lease or transfer in other mode of the YMCA Project to an entity that is not a qualified 501(c)(3) entity under the Internal Revenue Code of 1987, as amended, or a unit of state or local government, in connection with the foreclosure of the Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Financing Agreement and Assignment of Leases and Rents from the YMCA of Greater Saint Paul, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, for the benefit of Patriot Bank Minnesota, pursuant to the issuance of the City's Revenue Note (YMCA Project) Series 2006A and Revenue Note (YMCA Project) Series 2006B. Book Entry System The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "), New York, New York, will act as securities depository for the Obligations. The Obligations will be issued as fully registered securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee) or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully registered certificate will be issued for each maturity of each series of the Obligations, in the aggregate principal amount of such maturity, and will be deposited with DTC. DTC is a limited - purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a "banking organization" within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a "clearing agency" registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DTC holds securities that its participants ( "Direct Participants ") deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post -sale settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities through electronic computerized book -entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants' accounts, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants ( "Direct Participants ") include securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly -owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation ( "DTCC "). DTCC, in turn, is owned by a number of Direct Participants of DTC and members of the National Securities Clearing Corporation, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, and Emerging Markets Clearing Corporation (NSCC, FICC, and EMCC, also subsidiaries of DTCC), as well as by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the American Stock Exchange LLC, and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly ( "Indirect Participants "). The Rules applicable to DTC and its Direct and Indirect Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com and www.dtc.orq. Purchases of Obligations under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the Obligations on DTC's records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Obligation ( "Beneficial Owner ") is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants' records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase, but Beneficial Owners are expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Obligations are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in the Obligations, except in the event that use of the book -entry system for the Obligations is discontinued. 3 To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Obligations deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC's partnership nominee, Cede & Co. or such other name as requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of Obligations with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee do not effect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Obligations; DTC's records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Obligations are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of the Obligations may wish to take certain steps to augment transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the Obligations, such as redemptions, tenders, defaults, and proposed amendments to the security documents. Beneficial Owners of the Obligations may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Obligations for their benefit has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners, or in the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to provide their names and addresses to the Registrar and request that copies of the notices be provided directly to them. Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the Series 2006C Bonds within a maturity are being redeemed, DTC's practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in such maturity to be redeemed. Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor such other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to the Obligations unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC's procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the Issuer or Registrar as soon as possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.'s consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts the Obligations are credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy). Principal and interest payments on the Obligations will be made to Cede & Co. or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC's practice is to credit Direct Participants' accounts, upon DTC's receipt of funds and corresponding detail information from Issuer or Agent on the payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC's records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in "street name," and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC (nor its nominee), the Registrar, or the Issuer, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of principal and interest to Cede & Co. (or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of the Registrar, Issuer, or Agent disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants. A Beneficial Owner shall give notice to elect to have its Obligations purchased or redeemed, through its Direct Participant, to the nominee holding the Obligations, and shall effect delivery of such Obligations by causing the Direct Participant to transfer the Direct Participant's interest in the Obligations, on DTC's records, to the nominee holding the Obligations. The requirement for physical delivery of the Obligations in connection with a purchase or redemption will be deemed satisfied when the ownership rights in the Obligations are transferred by the Direct Participants on DTC's records and followed by a book -entry credit of purchased or redeemed Obligations to the nominee holding the Obligations. DTC may discontinue providing its services as securities depository with respect to the Obligations at any time by giving reasonable notice to the Registrar. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor securities depository is not obtained, certificates are required to be printed and delivered. The Issuer may decide to discontinue use of the system of book -entry transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, certificates will be printed and delivered. The information in this section concerning DTC and DTC's book -entry system has been obtained from sources that the Issuer believes to be reliable, but the Issuer takes no responsibility for the accuracy thereof. THE SERIES 2006C BONDS Authority and Purpose The Series 2006C Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 469 and 475. Proceeds of the Series 2006C Bonds will be used to finance a portion of the Project between the City and the YMCA (see Project description in "RELATED FINANCING" herein). The composition of the Series 2006C Bonds is as follows: Project Costs $2,351,788 Capitalized Interest 48,502 Costs of Issuance 32,650 Allowance for Discount Bidding 27,060 Total Series 2006C Bonds $2,460,000 Security and Financing The Series 2006C Bonds are general obligations of the City for which the City pledges its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition, the City will pledge tax abatement revenues to be derived by the City from specified properties. Taxes will be abated for a period of 15 years, commencing in levy year 2007 for taxes payable in 2008. The City will make its first levy for the Series 2006C Bonds in 2006 for collection in 2007. Capitalized interest has been included in the principal amount of the Series 2006C Bonds in an amount sufficient to pay the interest due on February 1, 2007. The August 1, 2007 through February 1, 2010 interest payments will be paid from a combination of general ad valorem taxes and tax abatement revenues. Beginning with the August 1, 2009 interest payment, tax abatement revenues, if collected in full, will be sufficient to pay 105% of the interest payment due on August 1 in the year of collection and the principal and interest payment due on February 1 of the following year. THE SERIES 2006D BONDS Authority and Purpose The Series 2006D Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 444 and 475. Proceeds of the Series 2006D Bonds will be used to finance improvements to the City's water and sewer utilities related to the following projects: (i) the County Road 49 watermain project (the "County Road 49 Project ") and (ii) the Lois Lane watermain project (the "Lois Lane Project "). The composition of the Series 2006D Bonds is as follows: County Road Lois Lane Issue 49 Project Project Summary Project Costs $224,742 $320,378 $545,120 Costs of Issuance 6,968 9,932 16,900 Allowance for Discount Bidding 3,290 4,690 7,980 Total Series 2006D Bonds $235,000 $335,000 $570,000 Security and Financing The Series 2006D Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City pledges its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition, the City will pledge net revenues of its water and sewer utilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 444 and the resolution awarding the sale of the Series 2006D Bonds, the City will covenant to maintain water and sewer rates sufficient to support the operation of the water and sewer utilities and to pay debt service. The City is required to annually review its budget for the utilities to determine whether current rates and charges are sufficient and to adjust such rates and charges as necessary. Net revenues of the City's water and sewer utilities, if collected in full, are expected to be sufficient to pay 105% of the February 1 principal and interest payment and the August 1 interest payment due in the year of collection. The City does not expect to levy taxes for repayment of the Series 2006D Bonds. FUTURE FINANCING The City expects to issue refunding bonds to achieve interest savings in the fall of 2006. LITIGATION The City is not aware of any threatened or pending litigation affecting the validity of the Bonds or the City's ability to meet its financial obligations. LEGALITY The Bonds are subject to approval as to certain matters by Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, of Minneapolis, Minnesota as Bond Counsel for the City. Bond Counsel has not participated in the preparation of this Official Statement, except for the following "Tax Exemption" section, and will not pass upon its accuracy, completeness, or sufficiency. Bond Counsel has neither examined nor attempted to examine or verify any of the financial or statistical statements, or data contained in this Official Statement, and will express no opinion with respect thereto. Legal opinions in substantially the forms set out as Appendix I to this Official Statement will be delivered at closing. TAX EXEMPTION In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and decisions, interest on the Bonds is not includable in the "gross income" of the owners thereof for purposes of federal income taxation and is not includable in taxable net income of individuals, estates or trusts for purposes of State of Minnesota income taxation, but is subject to State of Minnesota franchise taxes measured by income that are imposed upon corporations and financial institutions. Noncompliance following the issuance of the Bonds with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code ") and covenants of the Bond resolutions may result in the inclusion of interest on the Bonds in gross income (for federal tax purposes) and taxable net income for State of Minnesota tax purposes of the owners thereof. No provision has been made for redemption of the Bonds, or for an increase in the interest rate on the Bonds, in the event that interest on the Bonds becomes subject to United States or State of Minnesota income taxation. The Code imposes an alternative minimum tax with respect to individuals and corporations on alternative minimum taxable income. Interest on the Bonds will not be treated as a preference item in calculating alternative minimum taxable income. The Code provides, however, that a portion of the adjusted current earnings of a corporation not otherwise included in the minimum tax base would be included for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax that may be imposed with respect to corporations. Adjusted current earnings include income received that is otherwise exempt from taxation such as interest on the Bonds. The Code provides that in the case of an insurance company subject to the tax imposed by Section 831 of the Code, the amount which otherwise would be taken into account as "losses incurred" under Section 832(b)(5) shall be reduced by an amount equal to 15% of the interest on the Bonds that is received or accrued during the taxable year. Interest on the Bonds may be included in the income of a foreign corporation for purposes of the branch profits tax imposed by Section 884 of the Code. Under certain circumstances, interest on the Bonds may be subject to the tax on "excess net passive income" of S corporations imposed by Section 1375 of the Code. The above is not a comprehensive list of all Federal tax consequences which may arise from the receipt of interest on the Bonds. The receipt of interest on the Bonds may otherwise affect the Federal or State income tax liability of the recipient based on the particular taxes to which the recipient is subject and the particular tax status of other items or deductions. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any such consequences. All prospective purchasers of the Bonds are advised to consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of, or tax considerations for, purchasing or holding the Bonds. 7 BANK - QUALIFIED TAX- EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS The City will designate the Bonds as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, relating to the ability of financial institutions to deduct from income for federal income tax purposes, interest expense that is allocable to carrying and acquiring tax - exempt obligations. RATINGS Applications for ratings of the Bonds have been made to Moody's Investors Service ( "Moody's "), 99 Church Street, New York, New York. If ratings are assigned, they will reflect only the opinion of Moody's. Any explanation of the significance of the ratings may be obtained only from Moody's. There is no assurance that ratings, if assigned, will continue for any given period of time, or that such ratings will not be revised or withdrawn, if in the judgment of Moody's, circumstances so warrant. A revision or withdrawal of the ratings may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Bonds. FINANCIAL ADVISOR The City has retained Springsted Incorporated, Public Sector Advisors, of St. Paul, Minnesota, as financial advisor (the "Financial Advisor ") in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. In preparing the Official Statement, the Financial Advisor has relied upon governmental officials, and other sources, who have access to relevant data to provide accurate information for the Official Statement, and the Financial Advisor has not been engaged, nor has it undertaken, to independently verify the accuracy of such information. The Financial Advisor is not a public accounting firm and has not been engaged by the City to compile, review, examine or audit any information in the Official Statement in accordance with accounting standards. The Financial Advisor is an independent advisory firm and is not engaged in the business of underwriting, trading or distributing municipal securities or other public securities and therefore will not participate in the underwriting of the Bonds. CERTIFICATION The City has authorized the distribution of this Official Statement for use in connection with the initial sale of the Bonds. As of the date of the settlement of the Bonds, the Purchaser(s) will be furnished with a certificate signed by the appropriate officers of the City. The certificate will state that as of the date of the Official Statement, the Official Statement did not and does not as of the date of the certificate contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 8 CITY PROPERTY VALUES 2005 Indicated Market Value of Taxable Property: $2,125,476,132* Calculated by dividing the City's 2005 taxable market value of $1,736,514,000 by the 2004 sales ratio of 81.7% for the City as determined by the State Department of Revenue. (2005 sales ratios not yet available.) Includes mobile home valuation of $2,196,200. 2005 Taxable Net Tax Capacity: $19,255,688 2005 Net Tax Capacity Less: Captured Tax Increment Tax Capacity Contribution to Fiscal Disparities Plus: Distribution from Fiscal Disparities Mobile Homes 2005 Taxable Net Tax Capacity 2005 Taxable Net Tax Capacity by Class of Property Real Estate: Residential Homestead Commercial /Industrial and Public Utility* Residential Non - Homestead Agricultural and Other Mobile Homes Personal Property Total $14,804,818 3,136,442 724,052 296,749 21,962 271,665 $19,255,688 $18,837,867 (391,010) (1,010,480) 1,797,349 21,962 $19,255,688 Reflects adjustments for fiscal disparities and captured tax increment tax capacity. Trend of Values (a) (b) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Indicated Taxable Market Value(a) Market Value $2,125,476,132 1,878,743,819 1,635,386,691 1,409,349,451 1,143,508,776 $1,736,514,000 1,534,933,700 1,339,381,700 1,154,257,200 990,278,600 Calculated by dividing the City's taxable market value by the aggregate City each year by the State Department of Revenue. See Appendix 111 for an explanation of taxable net tax capacity and system. 76.9% 16.3 3.8 1.5 0.1 1.4 100.0% Taxable Net Tax Capacity(b) $19,255,688 17,213,837 15,276,466 12,688,859 10,913,995 sales ratio computed for the the Minnesota property tax Ten of the Largest Taxpayers Taxpayer Target Corporation Lino Lakes Realty LLC Kohl's Department Store Xcel Energy Molin Concrete Products Taylor Corporation Gargaro Properties LLC Marmon /Keystone Corp. Lino Lakes Business Center F &G Inc. Total Type of Property Retail Commercial /Industrial Retail Utility Commercial /Industrial Commercial /Industrial Commercial /Industrial Commercial /Industrial Commercial /Industrial Commercial /Industrial Represents 7.0% of the City's 2005 taxable net tax capacity. CITY INDEBTEDNESS Legal Debt Limit Legal Debt Limit (2% of Taxable Market Value) Less: Outstanding Debt Subject to Limit Legal Debt Margin as of May 31, 2006 General Obligation Debt Supported by Taxes* Date of Issue 2 -1 -03 3 -31 -03 2 -1 -04 Total Original Amount Purpose $130,000 200,000 274,000 Equipment Certificates Equipment Certificates Equipment Certificates These issues are subject to the statutory debt limit. 2005 Net Tax Capacity $ 263,094 240,710 162,956 133,655 112,313 110,926 85,878 80,960 78,802 76,746 $1,346,040* $34,730,280 (4,528,000) $30,202,280 Final Maturity 12 -31 -2006 12 -31 -2006 12 -31 -2007 Principal Outstanding As of 5 -31 -06 $ 40,000 85,000 193,000 $318,000 General Obligation Debt Supported Primarily by Special Assessments Date Original of Issue Amount 7 -1 -02 7 -1 -02 12 -1 -03 12 -1 -03 11 -15 -04 11 -1 -05 11 -1 -05 Total $ 645,000 2,110,000 250,000 2,090,000 620,000 5,550,000 3,755,000 Purpose Improvements Taxable Improvements Taxable Improvements Improvement and Refunding Bonds Improvements Taxable Improvements Improvement Refunding General Obligation Debt Supported by Tax Abatements Date Original of Issue Amount 8 -15 -06 $2,460,000 Purpose Tax Abatement (the Series 2006C Bonds) General Obligation Debt Supported by Revenues Date Original of Issue Amount 10 -1 -96 9 -1 -99 11 -15 -04 8 -15 -06 Total $3,320,000 680,000 710,000 570,000 Purpose Water System Improvements Water Revenue Refunding Water Revenue Water and Sewer Revenue (the Series 2006D Bonds) Installment Contract and Lease Obligations Date Original of Issue Amount 8 -1 -98 $5,350,000 9 -1 -99 980,000 Total Purpose Municipal Complex Lease Public Project Revenue Refunding Principal Final Outstanding Maturity As of 5 -31 -06 2 -1 -2013 $ 355,000 2 -1 -2013 1,580,000 2 -1 -2014 210,000 2 -1 -2019 1,210,000 2 -1 -2020 590,000 2 -1 -2021 5,550,000 2 -1 -2015 3,755,000 $13,250,000 Principal Final Outstanding Maturity As of 5 -31 -06 2 -1 -2023 $2,460,000 Final Maturity 2 -1 -2012 2 -1 -2008 2 -1 -2020 2 -1 -2017 Final Maturity 2 -1 -2019 2 -1 -2010 Principal Outstanding As of 5 -31 -06 $1,910,000 220,000 675,000 570,000 $3,375,000 Principal Outstanding As of 5 -31 -06 $4,210,000(a) 385,000 (b) $4,595,000 (a) This issue is subject to the statutory debt limit. (b) This issue is not subject to annual appropriation and is not subject to the statutory debt limit. Annual Calendar Year Debt Service Payments Including These Issues G.O. Debt Supported G.O. Debt Supported Primarily by by Taxes Special Assessments Principal Principal Year Principal & Interest Principal & Interest 2006 (at 5 -31) $220,000 $233,520.00 (Paid) $ 405,494.39 2007 98,000 101,920.00 $ 1,375,000 1,946,568.76 2008 1,115,000 1,640,548.76 2009 1,060,000 1,540,532.51 2010 1,085,000 1,518,968.76 2011 1,125,000 1,510,351.26 2012 1,160,000 1,494,681.26 2013 1,195,000 1,474,165.01 2014 925,000 1,152,001.26 2015 910,000 1,092,318.76 2016 515,000 662,818.76 2017 540,000 662,593.76 2018 570,000 665,950.01 2019 600,000 667,750.01 2020 550,000 589,759.38 2021 525,000 538,125.00 Total $318,000 $335,440.00 $13,250,000(a) $17,562,627.65 G.O. Debt Supported G.O. Debt Supported by Tax Abatements by Revenues Principal Principal Year Principal & Interest(b) Principal & Interest(c) 2006 (at 5 -31) -0- -0- (Paid) $ 69,900.00 2007 -0- $ 101,094.48 $ 345,000 498,226.63 2008 -0- 105,185.00 415,000 550,987.50 2009 -0- 105,185.00 435,000 550,252.50 2010 -0- 105,185.00 455,000 547,817.50 2011 $ 30,000 134,615.00 480,000 548,795.00 2012 85,000 187,387.50 505,000 548,010.00 2013 125,000 223,230.00 105,000 132,665.00 2014 140,000 232,895.00 110,000 133,562.50 2015 155,000 241,882.50 110,000 129,217.50 2016 170,000 250,177.50 115,000 129,638.75 2017 190,000 262,660.00 125,000 134,720.00 2018 205,000 269,313.75 55,000 61,050.00 2019 225,000 280,120.00 60,000 63,712.50 2020 250,000 294,845.00 60,000 61,237.50 2021 270,000 303,467.50 2022 295,000 315,963.75 2023 320,000 327,200.00 Total $2,460,000(d) $3,740,406.98 (a) 79.0% of this debt will be retired within ten years (b) Includes the Series 2006C Bonds at an assumed average annual interest rate of 4.30 %. (c) Includes the Series 2006D Bonds at an assumed average annual interest rate of 4.05 %. (d) 28.7% of this debt will be retired within ten years. (e) 91.1% of this debt will be retired within ten years. $3,375,000(e) $4,159,792.88 - 12 - Annual Calendar Year Debt Service Payments Including These Issues (continued) Year 2006 (at 5 -31) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Installment Contract and Lease Obligations Principal Principal & Interest (Paid) $ 330,000 350,000 365,000 260,000 290,000 305,000 325,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 405,000 430,000 455,000 $4,595,000* 71.9% of this debt will be retired within ten years. Indirect Debt Taxing Unit(a) Anoka County ISD 12 (Centennial) ISD 624 (White Bear Lake) ISD 831 (Forest Lake) Northeast Metropolitan Intermediate District Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Transit District Total (a) (b) (c) (d) 2005 Taxable Net Tax Capacity $ 296,151,005 26,341,846 67,192,069 47,772,049 578,369,277 3,001,556,502 2,571,034,905 $ 118,035.00 558,265.00 562,072.50 559,560.00 438,890.00 455,095.00 455,067.50 459,002.50 456,790.00 458,415.00 458,990.00 463,181.25 465,845.00 467,171.25 $6,376,380.00 G.O. Debt As of 5- 31 -06(b) $ 79,735,000(d) 80,505,000 55,915,000 38,685,000 1,055,000 27,435,000(d) 147,435,000 Debt Applicable to Tax Capacity in City Percent Amount 6.5% 49.3 3.7 7.8 2.7 0.6 0.7 $ 5,182,775 39,688,965 2,068,855 3,017,430 28,485 164,610 1,032,045 $51,183,165 Only those taxing units with general obligation debt outstanding are included here. Excludes general obligation debt supported by revenues and annual allotments of state -aid and revenue debt, but includes long -term lease obligations. Includes $3,785,000 of various public project revenue refunding bonds issued by the City of Blaine Economic Development Authority, all of which are payable solely by the County pursuant to a lease agreement between the County and the various public entities. Excludes general obligation debt supported by sanitary sewer revenues, 911 user fees, and housing rental payments. Includes Certificates of Participation. Debt Ratios G.O. Net Direct Debt* G.O. Indirect & Net Direct Debt To 2005 Indicated Market Value ($2,125,476,132) 0.86% 3.27% Per Capita (18,725 -2004 Metropolitan Council estimate) $979 $3,712 Excludes general obligation debt supported by revenues and includes installment contract and lease obligations. CITY TAX RATES, LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS Tax Capacity Rates For a City Resident in Independent School District 12 2005/06 For 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 Total Debt Only Anoka County(a) 37.976% 38.469% 35.765% 33.581% 32.543% 3.899% City of Lino Lakes 53.084 47.603 42.287 42.223 41.398 4.804 School Districts(b) 37.828 37.467 36.649 37.486 40.253 31.773 Special Districts(c) 5.913 6.295 5.829 6.195 6.032 1.809 Total 134.801% 129.834% 120.530% 119.485% 120.226% 42.285% (a) Includes Anoka County Library and County /City Radio. (b) School districts include Independent School District No. 12 (Centennial) and Northeast Metropolitan Intermediate District No. 916. Independent School District No. 12 (Centennial) also has a 2005/06 tax rate of 0.15810% spread on the market value of property in support of an excess operating levy. Special districts include Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Transit District, Metropolitan Mosquito Control, Rice Creek Watershed, and Anoka County Railroad Authority. (c) NOTE: Taxes are determined by multiplying the net tax capacity by the tax capacity rate expressed as a percentage. (See Appendix Ill.) Tax Levies and Collections Collected During Collected Net Collection Year As of 12 -31 -05 Levy /Collect Levy* Amount Percent Amount Percent 2005/06 $7,694,442 (In Process of Collection) 2004/05 6,954,239 $6,867,803 98.8% $6,867,803 98.8% 2003/04 6,200,404 6,139,224 99.0 6,176,758 99.6 2002/03 5,735,745 5,658,922 98.7 5,729,636 99.9 2001/02 5,471,180 5,413,025 98.9 5,467,959 99.9 The net levy excludes state aid for property tax relief and fiscal disparities, if applicable. The net levy is the basis for computing tax capacity rates. See Appendix Ill. FUNDS ON HAND As of May 31, 2006 Fund Cash and Investments General Fund $ 3,137,455 Special Revenue 123,138 Capital Projects 7,022,849 Enterprise Funds 5,207,961 Debt Service Fund 2,291,084 Agency Funds 2,228,038 Total $20,010,525 CITY INVESTMENTS As of May 31, 2006, the City had a total of $20,010,525, invested in the following manner: Percent of Portfolio Checking /CDs /money market $ 8,364,734 41.8% U.S. treasuries and agencies 9,458,330 47.3 Government mutual funds 1,455,461 7.3 Bonds 732,000 3.6 Total $20,010,525 100.0% In October 1997, the City adopted an investment policy that is in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 118A. Some highlights of the City's investment policy are as follows: 1. The primary objective is the safety of the principal. Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. The objective will be to mitigate credit risks and interest rate risk. a. Investments will be limited to those investments specified in Minnesota Statutes 118A. b. Annually appointing the financial institutions, brokers /dealers, intermediaries and advisors. c. Diversifying the investment portfolio so that potential losses on individual securities will be minimized. d. Investing funds in primarily shorter -term securities. 2. The secondary objective is to have the portfolio remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. 3. The third objective is to attain a market rate of return through budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. 4. The Finance Director and his /her appointed employees in case of unavailability are authorized to manage the investment program. A system of internal controls shall be followed and shall be designed to prevent losses from theft or misuse to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives are met. 5. The Finance Director will prepare an investment report monthly for the City Administrator. 6. All City Funds must be invested with financial institutions authorized to provide investment services per statute 118A.06, with representatives who are licensed and with institutions which have a minimum capital requirement of $5 million and at least five years of operation. GENERAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE CITY Lino Lakes is located in southeast Anoka County, approximately 20 miles north of St. Paul. The City is part of the Minneapolis /St. Paul Metropolitan Area and covers an area of approximately 33 square miles (21,120 acres). Two major Twin Cities freeways, I -35E and I -35W, and Minnesota Highway 49 traverse the community. The following table shows the City's recent population increases: 2004 (Metropolitan Council Estimate) 2000 (U.S. Census) 1990 (U.S. Census) 1980 (U.S. Census) 1970 (U.S. Census) Employment Major employers in the City include the following: Employer State of Minnesota Target Corporation AdGraphics Synovis Interventional Systems Summit Fire Protection Molin Concrete Products Co. Anoka County Juvenile Center Nol -Tec Systems, Inc. Custom Manufacturing & Engineering Population 18,725 16,791 8,920 4,966 3,692 Product/Service Increase 11.5% 88.2 79.6 34.5 Medium security prison Retail Prom /party supplies Surgical and medical instruments Installing building equipment Concrete products Juvenile and adult detention center Pneumatic conveyors Precision plastics Approximate Number of Employees NOTE: Rehbein Transit Inc. was sold and its assets liquidated. Three employees remain. Source: Telephone survey of individual employers, June 2006. 450 230 200 180 175 163 150 65 50 Labor Force Data May 2006 May 2005 Civilian Unemployment Civilian Unemployment Labor Force Rate Labor Force Rate Anoka County 192,981 3.2% 192,991 3.5% Mpls. /St. Paul MSA 1,849,954 3.1 1,849,512 3.5 State of Minnesota 2,933,728 3.3 2,953,057 3.7 Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. 2006 data are preliminary. Summary of Building Permits Total Permits New Single Family Homes Number Value Number Value 2006 (to 5 -31) 262 $15,931,557 52 $ 9,682,094 2005 837 53,656,592 196 37,604,938 2004 835 61,579,910 190 39,006,745 2003 826 55,864,076 112 25,687,000 2002 860 53,977,610 218 39,425,255 2001 1,042 74,974,042 210 39,695,169 2000 1,186 57,080,794 240 42,117,164 1999 893 54,522,159 243 34,337,713 1998 947 49,033,711 229 31,635,569 1997 597 32,666,843 197 24,232,078 The economic development effort established in 1993 by the City Council has begun to have an impact in the diversity of the City's tax base. Since 1993, the City has added more than $90 million in additional commercial /industrial market value. The Apollo Business Park on I -35W and the Clearwater Creek Development Center on I -35E continue to attract industrial development. The 265,000- square -foot Panattoni distribution center, in the southwest quadrant of the Town Center area, was completed in spring 2004. Commercial development in the City has been the focus of a City- initiated development called the Town Center in the I -35W interchange area. This project incorporates mixed -use development that includes professional buildings, civic facilities, commercial development, and a mix of housing types. The City received a $220,000 Livable Communities grant in 1998 from the Metropolitan Council to hire Peter Calthrope Associates, a planner on urban and suburban neighborhood development, to refine the City's plan for the Town Center. Additional grants totaling $1,200,000 were awarded in the years 2000 through 2005 to begin implementation of the housing initiatives outlined in the Calthrope plan. The part of the Town Center area located on the northeast quadrant of I -35W and Lake Drive began developing as a commercial retail center known as the Lino Lakes Marketplace in late 2001. This development includes a SuperTarget and a Kohl's Department Store, both completed and opened in 2002, and several other retail stores expected to be completed later this year. The development has spurred the need to upgrade Lake Drive from I -35W to 77th Street and to complete Apollo Drive east of Lake Drive, along with the installation of underground utilities and traffic control systems. The cost of the project was assessed against the new development. The Village, located in the southeast quadrant of the Town Center, is the site of the recently completed Lino Lakes Civic Complex. This $6 million facility, which houses City Hall, police, and a Centennial School District program, is a critical component in the mixed -use Town Center. The Civic Complex received an award from the League of Minnesota Cities for innovation and excellence in housing, economic development, and community spaces. Construction began in 2006 on a mixed -use development expected to include single - family townhomes, multi - family housing, senior housing, retail commercial buildings, a motel, and a community green area. Upon completion, slated for 2008, the development is expected to add between $116 million and $137 million to the City's tax base. Residential Development The following table shows projected lot development in existing subdivisions for single - family homes: Subdivision As of May 31, 2006 Total Lots Lots Remaining Caveen Estates 1 1 Century Farm North 58 4 Century Farm North 2nd Addition 65 10 Century Farm North 3rd Addition 52 50 Century Farm North 4th Addition 43 45 Clearwater Creek 4th Addition 58 5 Clearwater Creek 5th Addition 57 1 Hailey Manor 14 5 Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition 18 13 Highland Meadows West 110 3 Highland Meadows West 3rd Addition 69 2 Junes Addition 4 3 Marshan Estates 4 3 Marshan Meadows 20 19 Millers Crossroads 107 26 Millers Crossroads 2nd Addition 50 42 Millers Crossroads 3rd Addition 32 32 Pheasant Hills Preserve 8th Addition 16 1 Pheasant Hills Preserve 9th Addition 15 2 Pheasant Hills Preserve 10th Addition 16 1 Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition 8 Pine Glen 35 35 Raven's Hollow 56 33 Stoneybrook 103 16 Surfside Addition 5 0 Trapper's Crossing 2nd Addition 52 0 Turnberry Crossing (Marshan Townhomes 2 "d) 23 23 Vaughan Addition 5 5 West Shadow Ponds 22 8 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition 2 2 Education Lino Lakes residents are served by three school districts. The majority of the City's value lies within Independent School District No. 12 (Centennial) and Independent School District No. 831 (Forest Lake), with a small portion in Independent School District No. 624 (White Bear Lake). 2005/06 enrollment for Independent School District No. 12 was 7,000 students. 2005/06 enrollment for Independent School District No. 831 was 7,561. - 18 - GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION AND SERVICES Lino Lakes was incorporated as a village in 1955, became a statutory city on January 1, 1974 and is now governed by a Home Rule Charter as adopted on January 12, 1982. The City is governed by a Mayor and four Council members. The Mayor is elected to a two -year term of office and Council members are elected to four -year terms. The Council is currently comprised of the following members: Expiration of Term John Bergeson Mayor December 31, 2007 Donna Carlson Council Member December 31, 2007 Jeff O'Donnell Council Member December 31, 2009 Jeff Reinert Council Member December 31, 2009 Daniel Stoltz Council Member December 31, 2007 The City Administrator, Mr. Gordon Heitke, is responsible for administration of City policy. Mr. Heitke has been with the City since February 2004. The City's Finance Director is Mr. Alan Rolek, who has been with the City since April 2000. The City currently employs 68 full -time and 5 part-time personnel. Police protection is provided by 26 sworn police officers. Fire protection is provided by the Centennial Fire District which is comprised of the cities of Lino Lakes, Circle Pines, and Centerville. The District has a volunteer force of 52 members. The City has a class 5 insurance rating. Lino Lakes has established a Comprehensive Plan to direct all areas of growth within the City. The plan was approved by the Metropolitan Council in 1981 and was amended in 1987, 1990, 1991, 1992, and 2001. Further refinements are currently under review. Twenty -one parks and playgrounds are maintained by the City and include ball fields, hockey and skating rinks, playground and picnic facilities, and 13 miles of trails. Anoka County owns a 2,500 -acre park and an 18 -hole golf course within the City. The City currently provides municipal sewer and water through the operation of four wells, two water towers, and four lift stations. The City currently has 4,192 users of its sewer system and 3,996 users of its water system. The City has established a policy that provides that municipal water services will be extended only to sewered areas. Employee Pensions All full -time and certain part-time employees of the City of Lino Lakes are covered by defined benefit pension plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the Public Employees Retirement Fund (PERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF), which are cost - sharing multiple - employer retirement plans. PERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated members are covered by Social Security and Basic members are not. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. All police officers, fire fighters and peace officers who qualify for membership by statute are covered by the PEPFF. The City's contributions to the PERF for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 were $136,230, $128,263, and $124,431, respectively. The City's contributions to the PEPFF for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 were $158,282, $146,820, and $139,726, respectively. The City's contributions were equal to the contractually required contributions for each year as set by state statute. General Fund Budget 2005 Adopted 2006 Actual Budget Revenues: Property Taxes $6,054,104 $6,757,626 Licenses and permits 812,172 866,600 Intergovernmental 591,649 365,000 Special assessments 3,461 0 Charges for services 197,475 198,000 Fines and forfeits 100,980 110,000 Investment earnings 115,015 80,000 Refunds and reimbursements 32,509 0 Miscellaneous 138,480 230,000 Total General Fund Revenues $8,045.845 $8.607,226 Expenditures: General Government $2,353,519 $2,886,031 Public Safety 3,141,032 3,350,148 Public Works 969,338 996,283 Parks and Recreation 733,176 788,154 Conservation of Natural Resources 142,655 0 Contingency /Other 0 586,610 Total General Fund Expenditures $7 339,720 $8,607,226 (The Balance of This Page Has Been Intentionally Left Blank) - 20 - Kennedy Graven CHARTERED PROPOSED FORMS OF LEGAL OPINIONS 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337 -9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax http://www.kennedy-graven.com $2,460,000* General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C City of Lino Lakes Anoka County, Minnesota APPENDIX I We have acted as bond counsel to the City (the "Issuer ") in connection with the issuance by the Issuer of its General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C, (the "Bonds "), originally dated as of August 15, 2006, and issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $ . In such capacity and for the purpose of rendering this opinion we have examined certified copies of certain proceedings, certifications and other documents, and applicable laws as we have deemed necessary. Regarding questions of fact material to this opinion, we have relied on certified proceedings and other certifications of public officials and other documents furnished to us without undertaking to verify the same by independent investigation. Under existing laws, regulations, rulings and decisions in effect on the date hereof, and based on the foregoing we are of the opinion that: 1.The Bonds have been duly authorized and executed, and are valid and binding general obligations of the Issuer, enforceable in accordance with their terms. 2. The principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable from tax abatement revenues and ad valorem taxes, but if necessary for the payment thereof additional ad valorem taxes are required by law to be levied on all taxable property in the City, which taxes are not subject to any limitation as to rate or amount. 3.Based on federal and State of Minnesota laws, as presently enacted and construed, interest on the Bonds is not includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not includable, to the same extent, in net taxable income for State of Minnesota income tax purposes. Interest on the Bonds is includable in taxable income of corporations and financial institutions for purposes of the State of Minnesota franchise tax. Interest on the Bonds is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations and the State of Minnesota alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals, estates, and trusts. Interest on the Bonds is includable in the adjusted current earnings of certain corporations for the purposes of the federal and State of Minnesota altemative minimum taxes imposed on corporations. The opinion set forth in this paragraph is subject to the condition that the Issuer and the YMCA of Greater St. Paul (the "YMCA ") comply with all requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code "), that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds in order that interest thereon be (or continue to be) excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. Failure to comply with such requirements of the Code could cause the interest on the Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes and in net taxable income for State of Minnesota income tax purposes, retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bonds. The Issuer and YMCA have covenanted to comply with such requirements. We express no opinion regarding other federal or state tax consequences arising with respect to ownership of the Bonds or caused by the receipt or accrual of interest thereon. In rendering the foregoing opinion, we have relied upon (i) representations of the YMCA as to the application of the proceeds of the Bonds and the nature, use, cost, and economic life of the facilities financed with the proceeds of the Bonds, and (ii) the opinion of Redmon Law, as counsel for the YMCA, that the YMCA has been duly incorporated as a Minnesota nonprofit corporation and is in good standing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, that the YMCA is an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code and is exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501(a) of the Code, and that no substantial portion of the facilities financed with the proceeds of the Bonds are to be used in an unrelated trade or business activity of the YMCA. 4.The rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability of the Bonds may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, and other similar laws affecting creditor's rights generally and by equitable principles, whether considered at law or in equity. We have not been asked and have not undertaken to review the accuracy, completeness or sufficiency of the Official Statement or other offering material relating to the Bonds, and accordingly we express no opinion with respect thereto. This opinion is given as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update, revise, or supplement this opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to our attention or any changes in law that may hereafter occur. Dated , 2006 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. Kennedy Graven CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337 -9300 telephone (612) 337 -9310 fax http://www.kennedy-graven.com $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D City of Lino Lakes Anoka County, Minnesota We have acted as bond counsel to the City (the "Issuer ") in connection with the issuance by the Issuer of its General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D, (the "Bonds "), originally dated as of August 15, 2006, and issued in the original aggregate principal amount of $570,000. In such capacity and for the purpose of rendering this opinion we have examined certified copies of certain proceedings, certifications and other documents, and applicable laws as we have deemed necessary. Regarding questions of fact material to this opinion, we have relied on certified proceedings and other certifications of public officials and other documents furnished to us without undertaking to verify the same by independent investigation. Under existing laws, regulations, rulings and decisions in effect on the date hereof, and based on the foregoing we are of the opinion that: 1.The Bonds have been duly authorized and executed, and are valid and binding general obligations of the Issuer, enforceable in accordance with their terms. 2. The principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable from net revenues of the sewer and water system of the Issuer, but if necessary for the payment thereof, ad valorem taxes are required by law to be levied on all taxable property in the Issuer, which taxes are not subject to any limitation as to rate or amount. 3.Interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income of the recipient for federal income tax purposes and, to the same extent, is excludable from taxable net income of individuals, trusts, and estates for Minnesota income tax purposes, and is not a preference item for purposes of the computation of the federal alternative minimum tax, or the computation of the Minnesota alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals, trusts and estates. However, such interest is taken into account in determining adjusted current earnings for the purpose of computing the federal alternative tax imposed on certain corporations and is subject to Minnesota franchise taxes on corporations (including financial institutions) measured by income and the alternative minimum tax base. The opinion set forth in this paragraph is subject to the condition that the Issuer comply with all requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds in order that interest thereon be, or continue to be, excludable from gross income for federal and Minnesota income tax purposes. The Issuer has covenanted to comply with all such requirements. Failure to comply with certain of such requirements may cause interest on the Bonds to be included in gross income for federal and Minnesota income tax purposes retroactively to the date of issuance of the Bonds. We express no opinion regarding tax consequences arising with respect to the Bonds other than as expressly set forth herein. 4.The rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability of the Bonds may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, and other similar laws affecting creditor's rights generally and by equitable principles, whether considered at law or in equity. We have not been asked and have not undertaken to review the accuracy, completeness or sufficiency of the Official Statement or other offering material relating to the Bonds, and accordingly we express no opinion with respect thereto. This opinion is given as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update, revise, or supplement this opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to our attention or any changes in law that may hereafter occur. Dated , 2006 at Minneapolis, Minnesota, APPENDIX II CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE This Continuing Disclosure Certificate (the "Disclosure Certificate ") is executed and delivered by the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (the "Issuer ") in connection with the issuance of $ General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2006C and $570,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D (collectively, the "Bonds "). The Bonds are being issued pursuant to an authorizing resolution adopted by the City Council of the Issuer on May 22, 2006 and an award resolution adopted by the City Council of the Issuer on July 24, 2006 (collectively, the "Resolutions ") and delivered to the Purchaser(s) on the date hereof. Pursuant to the Resolutions, the Issuer has covenanted and agreed to provide continuing disclosure of certain financial information and operating data and timely notices of the occurrence of certain events. In addition, the Issuer hereby covenants and agrees as follows: Section 1. Purpose of the Disclosure Certificate. This Disclosure Certificate is being executed and delivered by the Issuer for the benefit of the Holders (defined herein) of the Bonds in order to assist the Participating Underwriters (defined herein) in complying with SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5). This Disclosure Certificate, together with the Resolutions, constitutes the written agreement or contract for the benefit of the Holders of the Bonds that is required by the Rule. Section 2. Definitions. In addition to the defined terms set forth in the Resolutions, which apply to any capitalized term used in this Disclosure Certificate unless otherwise defined in this Section, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings: "Annual Report" means any annual report provided by the Issuer pursuant to, and as described in, Sections 3 and 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. "Audited Financial Statements" means the Issuer's annual financial statements, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ( "GAAP ") for Governmental Units as Prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board ( "GASB "). "Fiscal Year" means the fiscal year of the Issuer. "Final Official Statement" means the deemed final official statement dated , 2006 plus the addendum thereto which together constitute the final official statement delivered in connection with the Bonds, which is available from the MSRB. "Holder" means the person in whose name a security is registered or a beneficial owner of such a security. "Issuer" means the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota which is the obligated person with respect to the Bonds. "Material Event" means any of the events listed in Section 5(a) of this Disclosure Certificate. "MSRB" means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board located at 1900 Duke Street, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22314. "NRMSIR" means any nationally recognized municipal securities information repository as recognized from time to time by the SEC for purposes of the Rule. "Participating Underwriter" means any of the original underwriter(s) of the Bonds (including the Purchaser(s)) required to comply with the Rule in connection with the offering of the Bonds. "Repository" means each NRMSIR and each SID, if any. "Rule" means SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5) promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time, and including written interpretations thereof by the SEC. "SEC" means Securities and Exchange Commission. "SID" means any public or private repository or entity designated by the State of Minnesota as a state information depository for the purpose of the Rule. As of the date of this Certificate, there is no SID. Section 3. Provision of Annual Financial Information and Audited Financial Statements. (a) The Issuer shall provide, as soon as available, but not later than 12 months after the end of the Fiscal Year commencing with the year that ends December 31, 2006, each Repository with an Annual Report which is consistent with the requirements of Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. The Annual Report may be submitted as a single document or as separate documents comprising a package, and may cross - reference other information as provided in Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate; provided that the Audited Financial Statements of the Issuer may be submitted separately from the balance of the Annual Report and will be submitted as soon as available. (b) If the Issuer is unable or fails to provide to the Repositories an Annual Report by the date required in subsection (a), the Issuer shall send a notice of that fact to the Repositories and the MSRB. (c) The Issuer shall determine each year prior to the date for providing the Annual Report the name and address of each Repository. Section 4. Content of Annual Reports. The Issuer's Annual Report shall contain or incorporate by reference the following sections of the Final Official Statement: 1. City Property Values. 2. City Indebtedness. 3. City Tax Rates, Levies and Collections Any filing under this Disclosure Certificate may be made solely by transmitting such filing to the Texas Municipal Advisory Council (the "MAC ") as provided at http: / /www.disclosureusa.org unless the SEC has withdrawn the interpretive advice in its letter to the MAC dated September 7, 2004. In addition to the items listed above, the Annual Report shall include Audited Financial Statements submitted in accordance with Section 3 of this Disclosure Certificate. Any or all of the items listed above may be incorporated by reference from other documents, including official statements of debt issues of the Issuer or related public entities, which have been submitted to each of the Repositories or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must also be available from the MSRB. The Issuer shall clearly identify each such other document so incorporated by reference. Section 5. Reporting of Material Events. (a) This Section 5 shall govern the giving of notices of the occurrence of any of the following events if material with respect to the Bonds: 1. Principal and interest payment delinquencies; 2. Non - payment related defaults; 3. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; 4. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; 5. Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; 6. Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax - exempt status of the security; 7. Modifications to rights of security holders; 8. Bond calls; 9. Defeasances; 10. Release, substitution or sale of property securing repayment of the securities; and 11. Rating changes. (b) Whenever the Issuer obtains knowledge of the occurrence of a Material Event, the Issuer shall promptly file a notice of such occurrence with either all NRMSIRs or with the MSRB and with any SID. Notwithstanding the foregoing, notice of Material Events described in subsections (a)(8) and (9) need not be given under this subsection any earlier than the notice (if any) of the underlying event is given to Holders of affected Bonds pursuant to the Resolutions. (c) Unless otherwise required by law and subject to technical and economic feasibility, the Issuer shall employ such methods of information transmission as shall be requested or recommended by the designated recipients of the Issuer's information. Section 6. Termination of Reporting Obligation. The Issuer's obligations under the Resolutions and this Disclosure Certificate shall terminate upon the legal defeasance, or upon the redemption or payment in full of all the Bonds. Section 7. Agent. The Issuer may, from time to time, appoint or engage a dissemination agent to assist it in carrying out its obligations under the Resolutions and this Disclosure Certificate, and may discharge any such agent, with or without appointing a successor dissemination agent. Section 8. Amendment; Waiver. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Resolutions or this Disclosure Certificate, the Issuer may amend this Disclosure Certificate, and any provision of this Disclosure Certificate may be waived, if such amendment or waiver is supported by an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that such amendment or waiver would not, in and of itself, cause a violation of the Rule. The provisions of the Resolutions constituting the Undertaking and this Disclosure Certificate, or any provision hereof, shall be null and void in the event that the Issuer delivers to each then existing NRMSIR and the SID, if any, an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that those portions of the Rule which require the Resolutions and this Disclosure Certificate are invalid, have been repealed retroactively or otherwise do not apply to the Bonds. The provisions of the Resolutions and this Disclosure Certificate may be amended without the consent of the Holders of the Bonds, but only upon the delivery by the Issuer to each then existing NRMSIR and the SID, if any, of the proposed amendment and an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that such amendment, and giving effect thereto, will not adversely affect the compliance of the Resolutions and this Disclosure Certificate and by the Issuer with the Rule. Section 9. Additional Information. Nothing in this Disclosure Certificate shall be deemed to prevent the Issuer from disseminating any other information, using the means of dissemination set forth in this Disclosure Certificate or any other means of communication, or including any other information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Material Event, in addition to that which is required by this Disclosure Certificate. If the Issuer chooses to include any information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Material Event in addition to that which is specifically required by this Disclosure Certificate, the Issuer shall have no obligation under this Certificate to update such information or include it in any future Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Material Event. Section 10. Default. In the event of a failure of the Issuer to comply with any provision of this Disclosure Certificate any Holder of the Bonds may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandamus or specific performance by court order, to cause the Issuer to comply with its obligations under the Resolutions and this Disclosure Certificate. A default under this Disclosure Certificate shall not be deemed an event of default with respect to the Bonds and the sole remedy under this Disclosure Certificate in the event of any failure of the Issuer to comply with this Disclosure Certificate shall be an action to compel performance. Section 11. Beneficiaries. This Disclosure Certificate shall inure solely to the benefit of the Issuer, the Participating Underwriters and Holders from time to time of the Bonds, and shall create no rights in any other person or entity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have executed this Certificate in our official capacities effective the day of , 2006. CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA Mayor City Administrator APPENDIX III SUMMARY OF TAX LEVIES, PAYMENT PROVISIONS, AND MINNESOTA REAL PROPERTY VALUATION (effective through payable 2006 with 2005 Legislative changes incorporated) Following is a summary of certain statutory provisions effective through payable 2006 relative to tax levy procedures, tax payment and credit procedures, and the mechanics of real property valuation. The summary does not purport to be inclusive of all such provisions or of the specific provisions discussed, and is qualified by reference to the complete text of applicable statutes, rules and regulations of the State of Minnesota. Property Valuations (Chapter 273, Minnesota Statutes) Assessor's Estimated Market Value. Each parcel of real property subject to taxation must, by statute, be appraised at least once every five years as of January 2 of the year of appraisal. With certain exceptions, all property is valued at its market value, which is the value the assessor determines to be the price the property to be fairly worth, and which is referred to as the "Estimated Market Value." Limitation of Market Value Increases. Minn. Stat., Sec. 273.11, Subdivision 1 a, was amended in 2005. For assessment years 2005 and 2006, the amount of the increase shall not exceed the greater of (1) 15% of the value in the preceding assessment, or (2) 25% of the difference between the current assessment and the preceding assessment. For assessment year 2007, the amount of the increase shall not exceed the greater of (1) 15% of the value in the preceding assessment, or (2) 33% of the difference between the current assessment and the preceding assessment. For assessment year 2008, the amount of increase shall not exceed the greater of (1) 15% of the value in the preceding assessment or (2) 50% of the difference between the current assessment and the preceding assessment. Taxable Market Value. The Taxable Market Value is the value that property taxes are based on, after all reductions, limitations, exemptions and deferrals. It is also the value used to calculate a municipality's legal debt limit. Indicated Market Value. The Indicated Market Value is determined by dividing the Taxable Market Value of a given year by the same year's sales ratio determined by the State Department of Revenue. The Indicated Market Value serves to eliminate disparities between individual assessors and equalize property values statewide. Net Tax Capacity. The Net Tax Capacity is the value upon which net taxes are levied, extended and collected. The Net Tax Capacity is computed by applying the class rate percentages specific to each type of property classification against the Taxable Market Value. Class rate percentages vary depending on the type of property as shown on the last page of this Appendix. The formulas and class rates for converting Taxable Market Value to Net Tax Capacity represent a basic element of the State's property tax relief system and are subject to annual revisions by the State Legislature. Property taxes are determined by multiplying the Net Tax Capacity by the tax capacity rate, expressed as a percentage. Property Tax Payments and Delinquencies (Chapters 275, 276, 277, 279 -282 and 549, Minnesota Statutes) Ad valorem property taxes levied by local governments in Minnesota are extended and collected by the various counties within the State. Each taxing jurisdiction is required to certify the annual tax levy to the county auditor within five (5) working days after December 20 of the year preceding the collection year. A listing of property taxes due is prepared by the county auditor and turned over to the county treasurer on or before the first business day in March. The county treasurer is responsible for collecting all property taxes within the county. Real estate and personal property tax statements are mailed out by March 31. One -half (1/2) of the taxes on real property is due on or before May 15. The remainder is due on or before October 15. Real property taxes not paid by their due date are assessed a penalty that, depending on the type of property, increases from 2% to 4% on the day after the due date. In the case of the first installment of real property taxes due May 15, the penalty increases to 4% or 8% on June 1. Thereafter, an additional 1% penalty shall accrue each month through October 1 of the collection year for unpaid real property taxes. In the case of the second installment of real property taxes due October 15, the penalty increases to 6% or 8% on November 1 and increases again to 8% or 12% on December 1. Personal property taxes remaining unpaid on May 16 are deemed to be delinquent and a penalty of 8% attaches to the unpaid tax. However, personal property that is owned by a tax - exempt entity, but is treated as taxable by virtue of a lease agreement, is subject to the same delinquent property tax penalties as real property. On the first business day of January of the year following collection all delinquencies are subject to an additional 2% penalty, and those delinquencies outstanding as of February 15 are filed for a tax lien judgment with the district court. By March 20 the clerk of court files a publication of legal action and a mailing of notice of action to delinquent parties. Those property interests not responding to this notice have judgment entered for the amount of the delinquency and associated penalties. The amount of the judgment is subject to a variable interest determined annually by the Department of Revenue, and equal to the adjusted prime rate charged by banks, but in no event is the rate less than 10% or more than 14 %. Property owners subject to a tax lien judgment generally have five years (5) in the case of all property located outside of cities or in the case of residential homestead, agricultural homestead and seasonal residential recreational property located within cities or three (3) years with respect to other types of property to redeem the property. After expiration of the redemption period, unredeemed properties are declared tax forfeit with title held in trust by the State of Minnesota for the respective taxing districts. The county auditor, or equivalent thereof, then sells those properties not claimed for a public purpose at auction. The net proceeds of the sale are first dedicated to the satisfaction of outstanding special assessments on the parcel, with any remaining balance in most cases being divided on the following basis: county - 40 %; town or city - 20 %; and school district - 40 %. Property Tax Credits (Chapter 273, Minnesota Statutes) In addition to adjusting the taxable value for various property types, primary elements of Minnesota's property tax relief system are: property tax levy reduction aids; the circuit breaker credit, which relates property taxes to income and provides relief on a sliding income scale; and targeted tax relief, which is aimed primarily at easing the effect of significant tax increases. The circuit breaker credit and targeted credits are reimbursed to the taxpayer upon application by the taxpayer. Property tax levy reduction aid includes educational aids, local governmental aid, equalization aid, county program aid and disparity reduction aid. Debt Limitations All Minnesota municipalities (counties, cities, towns and school districts) are subject to statutory "net debt" limitations under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.53. Net debt is defined as the amount remaining after deducting from gross debt the amount of current revenues that are applicable within the current fiscal year to the payment of any debt and the aggregate of the principal of the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Obligations issued for improvements that are payable wholly or proceeds of special assessments levied upon benefited property. Warrants or orders having no definite or fixed maturity. Obligations payable wholly from the income from revenue producing conveniences. Obligations issued to create or maintain a permanent improvement revolving fund. Obligations issued for the acquisition and betterment of public waterworks systems, and public lighting, heating or power systems, and any combination thereof, or for any other public convenience from which revenue is or may be derived. Certain debt service loans and capital loans made to school districts. Certain obligations to repay loans. Obligations specifically excluded under the provisions of law authorizing their issuance. Certain obligations to pay pension fund liabilities. Debt service funds for the payment of principal and interest on obligations other than those described above. partially from the 11. Obligations issued to pay judgments against the municipality. Levies for General Obligation Debt (Sections 475.61 and 475.74, Minnesota Statutes) Any municipality that issues general obligation debt must, at the time of issuance, certify levies to the county auditor of the county(ies) within which the municipality is situated. Such levies shall be in an amount that if collected in full will, together with estimates of other revenues pledged for payment of the obligations, produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to pay principal and interest when due. Notwithstanding any other limitations upon the ability of a taxing unit to levy taxes, its ability to levy taxes for a deficiency in prior levies for payment of general obligation indebtedness is without limitation as to rate or amount. Metropolitan Revenue Distribution (Chapter 473F, Minnesota Statutes) "Fiscal Disparities Law" The Charles R. Weaver Metropolitan Revenue Distribution Act, more commonly known as "Fiscal Disparities," was first implemented for taxes payable in 1975. Forty percent of the increase in commercial - industrial (including public utility and railroad) net tax capacity valuation since 1971 in each assessment district in the Minneapolis /St. Paul seven - county metropolitan area (Anoka, Carver, Dakota, excluding the City of Northfield, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, excluding the City of New Prague, and Washington Counties) is contributed to an area -wide tax base. A distribution index, based on the factors of population and real property market value per capita, is employed in determining what proportion of the net tax capacity value in the area - wide tax base shall be distributed back to each assessment district. STATUTORY FORMULAE: CONVERSION OF ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE (EMV) TO NET TAX CAPACITY FOR MAJOR PROPERTY CLASSIFICATIONS Property Type Residential Homestead Up to $500,000 Over $500,000 Residential Non - homestead Single Unit Up to $500,000 Over $500,000 2 -3 unit and undeveloped land Market Rate Apartments Regular Small City Low- Income Commercial /Industrial /Public Utility Up to $150,000 Over $150,000 Electric Generation Machinery Seasonal Recreational Commercial Homestead Resorts (1c) Up to $500,000 $500,000 - $2,200,000 Over $2,200,000 Seasonal Resorts (4c) Up to $500,000 Over $500,000 Seasonal Recreational Residential Up to $500,000 Over $500,000 Disabled Homestead Agricultural Land & Buildings Homestead Up to $600,000 Over $600,000 Non - homestead Local Tax Local Tax Local Tax Local Tax Local Tax Payable Payable Payable Payable Payable 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.500% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.800% 1.500% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.800% 1.500% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 0.900 %1 1.000%1 - 0.750%1 1.500% 1.500% 1.500% 1.500% 1.500% 2.000% 2.000% 2.000% 2.000% 2.000% 2.000% 2.000% 2.000% 2.000% 2.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 0.550% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.000% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.250% 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 1.000%2 1.000 %2 1.000%2 1.250 %2 1.250 %2 1.250 %2 1.250%2 1.250%2 0.450% 0.450% 0.450% 0.450% 0.450% 0.550 %2 0.550 %2 0.550 %2 0.550 %2 0.550 %2 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 1.000 %2 Rate increased to 1% in pay 2003, classification abolished for pay 2004 and pay 2005, of 0.75% in pay 2006 and thereafter. 2 Exempt from referendum market value tax. and re- established at a rate APPENDIX IV EXCERPT OF 2005 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City is audited annually by an independent certified public accounting firm. Data on the following pages was extracted from the City's comprehensive annual financial report for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "CAFR "). The reader should be aware that the complete CAFR may contain additional information which may interpret, explain, or modify the data presented here. The complete CAFR is available at the offices of the City. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) issued Statement 34, Basic Financial Statements for State and Local Governments in June 1999. The statement establishes a new financial reporting model for state and local governments. GASB developed the new requirements to make annual reports more comprehensive and easier to understand and use. The new requirements include government -wide financial statements prepared on the full accrual basis that are in addition to, not instead of, the traditional Fund -Based statements; and an expanded Budget Comparison that includes the adopted budget, final budget, and actual revenues and expenditures. The City has been awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition for excellence in State and local government financial reporting. The City has received this award every year since 1996. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such CAFR must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. The City believes its CAFR continues to conform to the Certificate of Achievement program requirements and is submitting its CAFR for the 2005 fiscal year to GFOA. Lars,- nAllerf CPAs. Consultants & Advisors www.larsonallen.com INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT I Ionorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These basic financial statements are the responsibility of the City's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these basic financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the basic financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as of December 31, 2005, and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable, thereof and for the year then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated March 24, 2006 on our consideration of the City of Lino Lakes Minnesota's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grants, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. The management's discussion and analysis and budgetary comparison information as listed in the table of contents are not a required part of the basic financial statements but are supplemental information required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquires of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information, such as the introductory section, combining fund financial statements, supplementary financial information and statistical section listed in the table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information. except for the introductory and statistical sections on which we express no opinion, has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Austin, Minnesota March 24, 2006 LARSON, ALLEN, WEISHAIR & CO., LLP IV -2 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS December 31, 2005 Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total ASSETS Cash and investments S 21,274,603 S 5,257,590 S 26,532,193 Cash and investments with escrow agent 496,875 - 496,875 Accrued interest receivable 233,023 - 233,023 Accounts receivable 197,916 300,763 498,679 Duc from other governments 221,720 - 22 1,720 Taxes receivable 182,943 - 182,943 Special assessments receivable 9,880,796 148,905 10,029,701 Prepaid items 150,415 11,095 161,510 Unamortized bond issue costs 143,471 - 143,471 Permanently restricted cash and investments 100,000 100,000 Capital assets: Land 2,809,059 - 2,809,059 Construction in progress 356,061 356,061 Other capital assets, net of depreciation 42,641,724 30,41 1,763 73,053,487 Total assets 78,332,545 36,486,177 114,818,722 LIABILITIES Accounts payable 1,191,870 35,594 1,227,464 Salaries payable 101,784 5,757 107,541 Contracts and rctainage payable 158,976 15,860 174,836 Accrued interest payable 358,888 59,786 418,674 Due to other governments 7,789 - 7,789 Other accrued liabilities 1,510 1,510 Non - current liabilities: Due within one year 6,332,871 312,874 6,645,745 Due in more than one year 19,092,284 2,139,626 21,231,910 Total liabilities 27,244,462 2,571,007 29,815,469 NET ASSETS Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 25,460,528 Restricted for: Debt service 1 1,950,484 Environmental improvements - nonexpendable 100,000 Unrestricted 13,577,071 Total net assets S 51,088,083 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these basic financial statements. IV -3 28,342,832 53,803,360 11,950,484 100,000 5,572,338 19,149,409 S 33,915,170 S 85,003,253 Y nue and Chan n O • d 00 n `u s 00 LIJ o— vrn•n.o- `O •O O• 00 7 N ✓ 1 V1 •p r h N •^1 ✓ r, r oo — .o r •o .o •n 7 — V, rn r- r V T- r In 7 •'1 r oo h b — 7 C V1 •C — •O ■C C 00 T N 7 ■1 •n b r- M r oo — r-- •o •O V� p v1 — O• ✓ r- v� 7 — r1 r w N C In en 0 — C r- N ■ O h J el GC h r. H O O r — .-, V1 • 00 — 00 r 00 7 el O O. 00 0• — 00 ej •D 7 .O — T C — c -r — 0• 7 .0 •r N — N — T O N r C o 0c z - c' ^ CO •n o0 C G — r — - r 0^ M oo 7 O 0o e C GO u 00 0' 0? N 00 — 0' h rn a o• o N 00 — o. 01 0 0, • C c .o Cr, r V1 — 000 7 ✓ a V1 P I"- r 0 0 N V • N . Obi ^r m rl N C• N o N O N 01 r 0' a ri T P ri N ert O ri z •p c rn 00 P N r• V1 0 00 7 r- r •• r o n ✓ o0 V'• 0 0 ✓ T O• .o O P ✓ 7 r. O o 7 n o •0 rl — h — r- O h n r- 00 V1 cc O V1 C • 7 D` h G CJ• — r -r n 0 O ? -7 r G •C N — 7 M1 — O 00 j 00 01 V1 00 N N O N .n O 7 •O 7 v1 0. 0• r N .n C r ✓ n •D 00 V1 V1 7 r+l 00 •n r •n N o0 •0 — 00 0 a — ci -t 7 n M O 00 O r vi 0' 0 00 — tl E v O E o 0 rn of en 0 00 en 4 Z N h n h N r+ .p r1 Y .O n — O — — 4O CO 0 C r - Y — o0 0 0 '. 09 9 y . . . n 0 00` e...1 Cr el .D 00 r- 0 a0 O r r1 Z r1 — N 00 — 0. r+ w 0 J ° 4 G 6 u 0 CO • conh r-i n 0 • 0.1 r1 n 0 ✓ fV sn r VI 0 GGO .00 VI. r1 0 _.o M v .0 re 00 00 00 .o .O N — n '0 Y 7 — N $ 13,300.371 r- O Y — • fl n N N — .0 .0 1 : w — + r1 n — O n 0 Y — Y W 0• .O Y O 0c O` r1 T c n Z +v. N Y 'n 00 'n N 0) r 'r n 0 00 r1 r1 0 .; N e 4 Y ^ n -7 .rt -r ri n O OO r'1 N - '.p OC n 00 N — -t to CO 00 S 1.850.219 • 00 to 00 O Y •D 0 N .O • n 00 n 00 00 f 0 —co n 4 0' O= n n n 0 0 w 00 N 0 .O N N r1 r. Z T el — ry Y 7,1 rn sO 00 — •I'1 v ++ - - 00 r- v 00 n v. T a n • ton .n • .o _-t r r- P r r 00 -r r•; a: 00 ri 00 7 ' Y n "1 .0 0 .0 r1 00 0' 0' 0 r1 0 r- ton N 0' 0' 0 O aJ h h O n n n V •O 00 Y ' n • r, - r- Y V Z r1 co Y 0'; v) 00 n — .n n r r- o 0o n r P r+ O h — 0 Z M — O — n 0r r n o a N ' • ✓ - 4 O 0 en _ n o n O 00 0 r r- Cr v, ,•i -r 0 ?' ' r1 r, n , in wt co Y .D r-i n r+ c VD 00 n 00 ri 00 0 r+ 0 rl n fl n 0 co n ri C 00 ri -r CO 00 7 00 O :1 co S 4,482.761 S 5,1 28,403 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE SHEET TO THE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS December 31, 2005 Total Fund Balances for Governmental Funds Total net assets reported for governmental activities in the statement of net assets is different because: Capital assets used in governmental funds are not financial resources and therefore are not reported in the funds. Those assets consist of: Land 2,809,059 Buildings, Net of Accumulated Depreciation 4,756,524 Office Equipment and Furniture, Net of Accumulated Depreciation 429,158 Vehicles, Net of Accumulated Depreciation 741,617 Machinery and Shop Equipment, Net of Accumulated Depreciation 251,406 Equipment, Net of Accumulated Depreciation 464,472 Infrastructure, Net of Accumulated Depreciation 35.998.547 Some of the City's property taxes and special assessments will be collected after year -end, but are not available soon enough to pay for the current period's expenditures, and therefore are reported as deferred revenue in the governmental funds. S 21,302,986 45,450,783 9.974,886 Bond issuance costs are reported as expenditures in the governmental funds and are shown net of accumulated amortization on the statement of net assets as prepaid items. 143,471 Interest on long-term debt is not accrued in governmental funds. but rather is recognized as an expenditure when due. Accrued interest for general obligation bonds is included in the statement of net assets. Long-term liabilities that pertain to governmental funds, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported as fund liabilities. All liabilities - both current and long -term - are reported in the statement of net assets. Balances at year -end are: Bonds payable Unamortized premiums Unamortized discounts Compensated absence payable Total Net Assets of Governmental Activities The accompanying notes are an integral part of these basic financial statements. (24,740,000) (176,166) 5,594 (514,583) (358,888) (25,425,155) S 51,088,083 ✓ O N -- 00 O ,n a 0 M •n r - N T 00 00 00 V", 00 us — — 00 •n a M 00 00 - N 00 a — O M — .O M a- O .0 O O M 00 .O a N 00 00 r .p - 7 00 .o — — M O M 00 P.' - 00 a 00 CI Jn 00 ' ry r rl O O a r a O n r T - r M 00 - 00 — ? .n O: r- «7 a a 71. O b O 00 • v, .o • a ' c r r - O C • u r .O x , A A - O v rn M O O 0 00 O N 00 O 00 0 - N N - 7 M M N 7 M r M M M r0 O r0 - Q — O - 00 M - D rl Y O N •"1 00 00 IO M .O 00 rO 00 J • a 00 r a + rl -r O ▪ 0o h a U 00 rl a - O C. r- T 1 CO T 00 C r T 0 0 O 11 O a 1 '0 00 rO O 00 -7 0 00 .0 00 + a T 00 0 00 '0 •n 0' rl 00 .O Y -0 en r M O - M N T M V 0 O 0 e v, ry ,.0 Y 7. r h O M a c 00 14 a 00 •n el el O 00 00 00 CO n N h N O a -t V' r Y O T :4 Y ■ T h a• O. T f.+ 00 T c' T 00 00 s 00 00 ' 11 T a h LO VD T U r T U O 7 C nj ` _ O U V 7 ▪ N E —O —o o`° E c v H - 0' • c c - u c, 0 c C O n , O a u v 111111! z IV -7 a v • h a a VD 00 ✓ 0 N O r t` M V, 00 - N 00 VD a Net increase (decrease) in fund balance O K O rl 01 S 2.346./07 00 0 CO 00 r 01 04 rl r 00 CO 00 n are an Integra CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA RECONCILIATION OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES Year Ended December 31, 2005 Net Change in Fund Balances -Total Governmental Funds Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different because: Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, assets are capitalized and the cost is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. Capital outlays Contributed capital assets Loss on disposal of capital assets Proceeds from sales of capital assets Dcpreciation expense The governmental funds report bond proceeds as financing sources, while repayment of bond principal is reported as an expenditure. In the statement of net assets, however, issuing debt increases long -term liabilities and does not affect the statement of activities and repayment of principal reduces the liability. Also, governmental funds report the effect of issuance costs, premiums and discounts when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities. Interest is recognized as an expenditure in the governmental funds when it is due. In the statement of activities, however, interest expense is recognized as it accrues, regardless of when it is due. The net effect of these differences in the treatment of general obligation bonds and related items is as follows: 814,226 1,581,610 (9,236) (280,269) (2,751.516) S 5,825,395 (645,185) Issuance of general obligation bonds (9,305,000) issuance of equipment certificates (107,000) Bond premium (176,231) Bond issuance costs 96,101 Repayment of bond principal 2,016,000 Interest expense for general obligation bonds (52,226) Amortization of bond issuance costs (5,244) Amortization of bond premium 3,376 Amortization of bond discount (398) (7,530,622) Delinquent and deferred property taxes and special assessments receivable will be collected subsequent to year -end, but arc not available soon enough to pay for the current period's expenditures, and therefore are deferred in the governmental funds. Deferred revenue - December 31, 2004 Deferred revenue - December 31, 2005 4,595,455 9,974,886 5.379,431 In the statement of activities, compensated absences are measured by the amounts earned during the year. In the governmental funds, however, expenditures for these items are measured by the amount of financial resources used (essentially, the amounts actually paid). During fiscal year 2005, compensated absence payable increased. (42,791) Change in Net Assets of Governmental Activities S 2.986.2228 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these basic financial statements. IV -8 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS - PROPRIETARY FUNDS December 31, 2005 Water Totals Sewcr 2005 Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents S 1,759,526 S 3,498,064 S 5,257,590 Accounts receivable 130,602 170,161 300,763 Special assessments receivable: Due from county 708 708 1,416 Prepaid items 5,145 5,950 11,095 Total current assets 1,895,981 3,674,883 5.570,864 Non- current assets: Special assessments, long term 147,489 147,489 Capital assets: Construction in Progress 356,061 356,061 Buildings 48,690 48,690 Equipment 105,935 160,042 265,977 Water and sewer systems 17,198,789 19,895,691 37,094,480 Total capital assets 17,709,475 20,055,733 37,765,208 Less: allowance for depreciation (3,202,712) (3,794,672) (6,997,384) Net capital assets 14,506,763 16,261,061 30,767,824 Total noncurrent assets 14,654,252 16,261,061 30,915,3 13 Total assets 16,550.233 19,935,944 36,486,177 Liabilities Current liabilities: Accounts payable S 30,982 S 4,612 S 35,594 Salaries payable 2,917 2,840 5,757 Contracts and retainage payable 15,860 - 15,860 Other accrued liabilities 1,510 1,510 Accrued interest payable 59,786 59,786 Bonds payable - current portion 295,000 - 295,000 Compensated absences payable - current portion 8,937 8.937 17,874 Total current liabilities 414,992 16,389 431,381 Non - current liabilities: Bonds payable - long term 2,130,000 - 2,130,000 Compensated absences payable - long term 4,813 4,813 9.626 Total noncurrent liabilities 2,134,813 4.813 2,139,626 Total liabilities 2,549,805 21,202 2,571,007 Net assets Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 12,081,763 16,261,069 28,342,832 Unrestricted 1,918,665 3,653.673 5.572,338 Total net assets S 14,000,428 S 19,914.742 S 33,915,170 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these basic financial statements. Iv -9 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS - PROPRIETARY FUNDS Year Ended December 31, 2005 Totals Water Sewer 2005 Operating revenue: Charges for services S 918,409 5 1,319,849 S 2,238,258 Hook -up charges 53,510 41,910 95,420 Water meter sales 57,276 57,276 Other operating revenue 1,980 1,980 Total operating revenue 1,031 ,175 1,361 ,759 2,392,934 Operating expenses: Personal services 153,940 155,575 309,515 Materials and supplies 158,992 49,608 208,600 Contractual services 27,316 49,974 77,290 MCES sewer charges 541,039 541,039 Depreciation 338,451 390,628 729,079 Utilities 48,114 23,241 71,355 Other 16,927 7,760 24,687 Total operating expenses 743,740 1,217,825 1,961,565 Net income (loss) from operations 287,435 143,934 431,369 Other income (expense): Investment earnings 36,105 84,205 120,310 Special assessments 13,239 1,006 14,245 Bond interest (131,327) (131,327) Paying agent fees (1,525) (1,525) Total other income (expense) (83,508) 85,211 1,703 Net income before contributions and transfers 203,927 229,145 433,072 Contributions and transfers: Contributions from private sources 771,360 948,170 1,719,530 Transfer from capital projects fund 304,195 304,195 Total contributions and transfers 1,075,555 948,170 2,023,725 Net income (loss) 1,279,482 1,177,315 2,456,797 Net Assets - January 1 12,720,946 18,737,427 31,458,373 Net Assets - December 31 S 14,000,428 S 19,914,742 S 33,915,170 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these basic financial statements. IV -10 CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - PROPRIETARY FUNDS Year Ended December 31, 2005 ('ash flows from operating activities: Cash receipts from customcrs ('ash paid to suppliers ('ash paid to employees Net cash flows from operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Transfer from capital project funds Net cash tlows from noncapital financing activities Water Totals Sewer 2005 S 1 ,027,184 $ 1 ,347,529 S 2,374,713 (221,978) (686,732) (908,710) (162,685) (161,657) (324,342) 642,521 499,140 1,141,661 304,195 304,195 304,195 304,195 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Principal paid on revenue bonds (280,000) - (280,000) Collection of special assessments 34,989 303 35,292 Interest and paying agent fees on revenue bonds (132,852) (132,852) Acquisition of capital assets (356,081) (2,794) (358,875) Net cash flows from capital and related financing activities (733,944) (2,491) (736,435) Cash flows from investing activities: Interest on investments 36,105 84,205 120,310 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 248,877 580,854 829,731 Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 1,510,649 2,917,210 4,427,859 Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 S 1,759,526 S 3,498,064 S 5,257,590 Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash from operating activities: Operating income (loss) S 287,435 S 143,934 S 431,369 Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash flows from operating activities: Depreciation 338,451 390,628 729,079 Change in assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in receivables (3,991) (14,230) (18,221) Decrease (increase) in prepaid items 293 172 465 Increase (decrease) in payables 20,333 (21,364) (1,031) Net cash flows from operating activities S 642,521 c 499,140 S 1,141,661 - Water lines in the amount of S771,360 were contributed to the Water Fund in 2005. - Sewer lines in the amount of S948,170 were contributed to the Sewer Fund in 2005. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these basic financial sta,cnnents. CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS - FIDUCIARY FUNDS December 31, 2005 Assets Cash and investments Deposits receivable Total assets Liabilities Accounts payable Deposits payable Totals 2005 S 1,380,493 10,520 5 1,391,013 S 88,580 1,302,433 Total liabilities S 1,391,013 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. IV -12 F Z 0 T9 T G C A .00L. G O. • ani O. E ff% 9 O O a L ▪ L ° c r 3 L c o c ,, 2,.•.`c. yO n G G n n ^ ` 9 .O C 9 0 O T V O n ,Q O — ,:tit ,„.5. G • El;.; c 0< a 6• ...8—. t 'o c ,-n C ,0. 797, G: Y J .O t. ^ V • 2 t. T y T n - n b 2 L L 00 L -=`, >,°' -.- y 7, r L G L 6 ✓ O 0..o C '" n c p„ 5 ;12 a0' a ,: G ti m G F G2 Y O - u G. c c L : o a a ' n. - - .9 ..'E. C A A - • 0 ,g .O � Y G C E 0 - la C T .L w n y u j G_ m ...7 •E c g n e 0 G O C O ` v7.l .g�g EL 00> n 9 n q T v i Z u 0 t is = 7........2 O -6 J3.- 0 4..T.20.= O G ..0 m 74'-'2='..°0 m 0 v c 0 H c= u 3 _ ^ -0 c .E c O .26 F G a. L u.- an 9 6 0 • n .,1 L i n i .2 _ T T C 118L5.7.-6. G 'u 2 ,G, c ;� 0 E v O F U °u u. o `0 55 Z ,0 0 7, .o u ' u -c a^-; `Van Z S ^a L ` O T Y n aU a -2 Q u c _ Z P20 P4 r6 o. z Z IV -13 H • nZ i Zu Z < G h � < Y U <2v Z Z -0^ c t o Z <h OZ Z Z < Yv 1 Z OZ Z } _J b U Z SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNJ ING POLICIES (C Z UMMARY OF SIG z n costs related to infrastructure rges that are used to finance water operating ta7 IV -14 vJ NIFICANT ACCOUNTING C ? „= D E= u 3 c E c u Cy 2 ul 5 t c L o =` u o U C? r A G POLICIES iL 00 G pn ° q ilia - O O U o a - T M i o , o '4 ° o a s, s 03. = U 79S2-14.7 U O c L ° „ c n v .2 c s c N n 3 - 3—' G9 T 3-o V L o q m a „ O L 4'V j' = . V C _ A - O ° ` 5 . L0; G „ ^ O 1..°I C o °3a o o Z 2� o = C m o n L - V - o V v O -' .-0 ;-.1 ... 2 ° _ .c o 0J - y = O_ G VD L rn ` .— -0.- F ca: 0= . 3'5 m u pa � „ :a W F' 111 c H IflI O O Q - G r C L C > V - E U .t-, E 3 i 9 E " .E _g- c - S ° to m L-0 _ u= O c a uc3 n-j .-..W U 3 O L c ..„0 74. _ p E m ' a - u m o o..0 ., = - o ° <i m ui`o U ' m P 57; 51,72' v v N -- V ; _° V - O I ..... L ° L p m E L C �n A-2 E V V - - `o v 2 E. ` ° c m A° L c e C 9 V Q'a E. 5 ° P .2 ,O u C ,,r. t - C q T<o C1 All; oc a ,2 _ - E `o Lo . _ o' c` u - ` t i o E i _ cc c 2 ° V i c4 ° „ L _ ,�, ,= q C a 5E-22 7. W O .o c1' O r u ,° ` „ M 1' j a> 2.7g-.t8 g 7 L 7 - 6 7_,1-...1. c u E C _ 7, u o e - G u .= - t '- T --a O FF = c �, 2 c a'. - r - - c ° L r 9 u E„ T N. r. -7...‘1.5 c=J L L Z c 7 A J _ _O = V L r� L 2-. ` 6 a= ',. O C u- i.. z _. E r E. q u G- =t h 1111 L C E-o. G`; T V E o t= i E .'� u: IV -15 L SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Z M. COMPENSATED ABSENCES IMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINIIF.1 I SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE RECOGNITION (CONTINUED) N. LONG -TERM OBLIGATIONS -\9 .3 } \ \ \j } \� .32= \: $ }() /L:_ 75 \ \ \ \- 5 \• ( / } }j} ,9==tiEg c 5 • - .o 0 2 INVENTORIES K. INTERFUND RECEIVABLES /PAYABLES O. FUND EQUITY IV-16 CAPITAL ASSETS P. INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS .=L :"7 ƒi „ !za O F Z w D Vf < IV -17 H O S v W O c ri Z er V. rag vt V. ) ! \ § ry and Shop Equipment 37%!/ = t.2 )!`k§ \- k }))))“. .) \k _f§\22± 0 __ ,,`E °2 `j § ƒ4)±§ % 7; (£=ff) . v,u 5 .2 / -- | ;\e §] ..2=Ei @ /± \[ o )\/'o_2 j) fi = - • i\\ } \\ \ 05 > ! {jg,.! �) -/ 3 lz-3j to \E >1.:i q ® . )k.2E,- /5< #K�}7]$ 233 ' : ®efk1#}] )\\ £Jf® = a \ 2 '5SS °33 %<0 i k- r ƒ I )ii • § f }3i|h 2 )} 2 &\ §5 ;a�! AND INVESTMENT } ■ IV-18 } \ .f } \ } 0 z § k \ ) [ 8 > cn § ) § City indebtedness at December 31, 2005 is composed of the following: ! §%§! §)$(1111 # DO § ■ a ;# § <!§ 2 !l =2252!!» # ■# §# § § § §§ -e -f r -e /\ \k§ik(\\ \ /f {}\ 0/$ ! F. iiail�!! I 722$27\ §f!a " 8 i { ;§ - 580 \)2 ! 8888 E!! $0000000000 I IV-19 • • § § §< ! DEFINED BEN .Uo 7 L � O T O y c z — p • n T 1 C . U ` C O 0 1,2<7.2.g2 F- O ,s9 -c 50` r U y 3 _ == C — U C O t T 7 _ - O _ _ = 3 3 o c -=U- a •: 9 c= P -0„,:0 Y Gn -CC - — y Gy • r U O L,oO _ u __- - C E U- oL O r 5_ r C? — O y0 9 T O 2 _ y z a � .y _ 3 _ u E n 'E C :I . r F, `i o Z o 0 o 6 n 4 n t y L - U G ` _ '' = U 1•= yC LGD0 -np 3 ICL 0 y = - Q T p V .. Oq w, "g - n 3 L n C_ c s _ Cw` W 5 Oa.- T -212 x O N u • C . pVC - - S'= J .a_--.," — _ U T L O O O 3 O e s'u r O C F P t.:72722 V U; - G O > 0= 3 � uo..0y , . 00. !- 62 . . o m_ A == 9 =a. - ... U t U L m O ° c T y y C :< n F U J 9_ L — T C o f _ n e ra V O •_ O O f ..2 j L� O u' U r U 7- . �' y C .- Y .J - u T= - F ,,,,:2; ^ > V .J '2 u C r — U O O n U < ae j 'a O G — o E J _∎ .0 e�. T4g u O U C 43 F. 6 O = o ' 7u Y T.r V .r. o IV -20 I,S34,931.7OO L C 72.117,1' m 0 Z ,-Y� L O - T TL V 0-0 O t = 6 - d - O 2 ` 10 Y'.. TO 2"0 o v2Ev c> E o V = g E E x c> a S T 2 C 12O _ '^ �+ 9 n e r N:;a Tom• - 111 i, u u F E u : A N ` C Y O E o0i w C C S L Tn.. d .-n ,n mg 7.1-22-E° ` 5n '232E1'4 O g. f, „E c-eo 2 v 3 p v, ® N t= .2 w0 > =vY W =i' g R Z ° - = Y E 07.10-7 c Q - r Y E u /..'2."115t= o v 1 9 u c g V Y a n = o E y �= ,. 2 u U L - 3 .= c T . °_ o y Q w L 7 ' U s t q u F O 0-0 Q — T u - - n T = 3 :6:g1-',' � .fl o o .n o ° u E = 1 T> o= O 3 ='§ g - i S E u > C t F g U = _ .3 .g.,; s° N E � t = Z C U Y H LV a. C =E ,2Ln o i -v R421z t 3 d v v E C y.0y s 2 c u ° m Y_ 'c 10 2 ° 2 o z z a-5 c .L =E o v t.:C c �° t N 5 Y u E m a_ Y o Z v 3 o W V r.°• E > Z o n n u L>, i , O o 2 °-' 2 nt of pF.''` Tn T w v V N y`o o- E g c L L E 1 X - o s m C c � ° > . 3 ° C 51 ° 14 v. m 4 m g n . r r ° .O _ _. V L UYC i zt ; = Gin V Z 7.,z,54,-=.1;'%.›,,6a g ,.. o a. `° 2 Y N < v U m A c a o r -gOS O-,= S HSD ° a Y a c m c A :a. A u° w n. n e ° 3 ° ? -, < Y mat ° t U c c 3 F .. N "- m Z. :v ` "" ='5 '2 L m O L V. W . Ch. t ao t u dA 702U5E= r o a2 _. U: u E 62 E28y- 0u nv; `v = di d u i `'2 A g ° 3 h r o m U _- Y »_ g o" o 0 0 0 0 61 _ L Z O..°=V.iVN2NLY 'x 2= o g U N c o= o- 2 i » _ °U .rc $Ur °Y° 3» 1. } Z U m p B. v _T 3 v g. w 1-7.7..-...= C = S ° L r O U _ o c Odi ° .2L 0.,,15.- ` U E --..--27,r 0.2 2 T m 2 C e L S % g..5-5..).0 w 3 v ; 3 _ Tv 42 U ----.2'72=-6Z U= F_ > U 2 o X _0 0' .d 3�.T^EMET c .9-°C2220= G'c 23y e' i - .= v L Y F O L VJ 2' m " C L= “F-r Q o U E o ;., U G_ = ry 4. �,o i, Z 2-o =NT_ < - - u U c .0 ` .2 Z u V UN�_o Q c. C _ o o 0 = V a c ° O l' '75 = Y v g 2-57.1' U - = o u. y s -? .Q C .• — O u 4' T " c'e of x o 9 v m _ = o 2 c c A CC U U- o IV -21 0 N„ h N N' 0.00. wow-- '0- M r -r ,mw,, we r. = 664.6 m.oi 0' c' aw more. - vi - - 7 Ya •O - o.',r0N m-, n a r O. H RISK MANAGEMENT z SHARE IN GAS FRANCHISE PROFITS 0'^ t00 C'O O O tJ 01-A' m c u g °U y o 7O ` . E o ° o V 0 0 o u u w m u u o Q" V :q U 1 `0' 3 > G V 0 yu o w . '12 m y u G' g. d V G O 0 - E yy H °0 0 a m Eu o °c F H < Y O t1 1 U U 5 a N -fl 2 c 0 u u 3 m A c o u c m a 0 .i . '0 .0 .Z" 'O y V ` V 47 1 > 9 y w u 0 2=0-..,111 0 ° , c ._0 �1 0 ° C V> C m u 0 y bO V y c w U 0-&-; .._IV D u§ g. 0 u ° ° ° U y U y u -v ri4 g (I IU _r0 E 3 0'3 3 a 11 z idual fund receivable and payable balances at December 31, 2005 are as f c 4' u y !� u '5J' y 1.O '9 -� u 00. O o 3'G u A .41'10 121 . u 5 1 o o m u ... V u o o u U G V y u O ° O 4. Oa0 V 1u.. N o p 0.2g-s? i3k-;4w oVFx 0 '-$ O'es.5 >c-2 c O F t :: 0. a,HU E u m o.a 11 c0.0>-,Z.; 0U 0 v E a O V V U> g -c o 10 N H H u 00 ' 00 '0 v_ '0 b 0 cn 49 Interfund receivable and payable balances represent the elimination of negative cash between funds. C (0 m 0 m 0 U .5 0 0 -5 w 0 w u 8 4. m V ° c n xJ' '571 U .0 z' u g. U o 00 00 z z ° 0 1.1 F= Individual fund transfers for fiscal year 2005 are as follow EBT OBLIGATIONS CONDUIT d z IV -22 O y O u A C T om' Q5.9m o bQy >.. u A b 10 u v O V u 0 -� u °. ° O a O u >3..2-.738 u g y C i0 E 0 y 3 a� .= u m m v 0 o H 74=0 0 0 .� u 0 E1... 0.O i" 01.20 1«. 7,3 emu, _ O 2"8'°4-°.,5 0 `0 .� c u= 0 8 p O u •0 m > ."' u u u 0: 00 u y z.< Q 6 m "5 0 oo ¢ u m m o o <' .S 5 u 01004' 0 42g14-Et 'J u A 00 5 > 5` u O' u 0 y ,u, 6C' y m c u v ? - •� wy V m 0 1 5 m o c 3 0 w A 49 H1 0 (01 '0 00 1 0 a .0 0 R.°‘ V vl O v N .9 s 3 b 0\ Un b 00 3 b vi Un 01 art 3 .0 N N 4 LEASE COMMITMENT Cy� 0 0 0 C1 0 0 0 0 h v0 vl O 0 h r 4, 0 0 b9 b r co 0. i1 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N F CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2005 Note 17 LEASE COMMITMENT (CONTINUED) The prorated carrying value of the building being leased is as follows: Building Less Accumulated Depreciation $ 929,970 (185,994) Net $ 743,976 Note 18 JOINT FIRE VENTURE The Centennial Fire District (the District) was established under a joint powers agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and two other cities. The general purpose of the District is to provide fire protection services including, but not limited to, fire prevention, firefighting and rescue service. Each member city is entitled to appoint two commissioners to the District's Board. Each calendar year participating cities are to pay the District its share of the total operating and capital budget in accordance with a funding formula contained in Section VII of the joint powers agreement. The funding formula takes into account each city's average number of calls, population, and total market value. During 2005, the City of Lino Lakes' contributions to the District were as follows: Operating $ 390,951 Capital 68,500 Total $ 459,451 Separate financial statements of the District can be obtained by contacting the Centennial Fire District. The audited condensed financial statements of the District as of December 31, 2005 are as follows: Total Assets $ 940,773 Total Liabilities 138,584 Total Net Assets 802,189 Total Operating Revenue 611,916 Total Operating Expenses 658,499 IV -23