HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/28/2006 Council PacketSUMMARY MINUTES
Monday
August 28, 2006
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Bergeson, Council Members Carlson, O'Donnell, Reinert & Stoltz
City Administrator: Gordon Heitke
Community Room (not televised)
A) Discussion of personnel matter
Meeting cancelled
lL WORK SESSIO , to follow closed meet
Community Room (not televised)
5:30 — 6:25 p.m. — Mayor Bergeson, Council Members O'Donnell, Reinert, Carlson, and
Stoltz present
Meeting recessed for session to follow the regular Council Meeting
A) Review city council meeting agenda
B) 2007 Budget Review (to follow regular council meeting)
N
➢ Open Mike / Public Comment
Darrell Olson, 898 Lois Lane, brought forward his concern about the high level of
noise from the Miller's on Main tent event on August 18 & 19.
➢ Call to Order and Roll Call
➢ 6:30 p.m. — Present were Mayor Bergeson, Council Members O'Donnell, Reinert,
Carlson & Stoltz
➢ Pledge of Allegiance
➢ Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items
Agenda was amended to move Item 1D from the consent agenda to Administration
(Item 3B)
Council Agenda
A)
2
*Ir
Consideration of Expenditures:
i) August 28, 2006 (Check No.77445 through
77580) in the amount of $793,359.32;
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 15302 through
15316) in the amount of $21,177.96.
8/28/2006
Pg 3 -16
B) Consider approval of August 9, 2006 Financial Retreat Minutes Pg 17 -20
C) Consider approval of August 14, 2006 City Council Minutes
D) Consider Accepting Donation from Centennial Firefighters
.; _,
(moved to Admin — Item 3B)
Pg 21 -25
Pg 26 27
Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Reinert, to approve the Consent
Agenda (Items 1A through 1C) was adopted by a unanimous voice vote
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
None
STRATION DEPAI
REP
A) Consideration of Resolution 06 -138, approving off -sale liquor Pg 28 -30
license for Brownstone Liquor, Inc., dba MGM Wines & Spirits, Inc.,
to open store at 709 Apollo Drive, Julie Bartell
Action Taken: Resolution amended to require compliance to all applicable laws;
Motion by Reinert, seconded by Stoltz, to approve Resolution 06 -138, as amended,
was adopted by a unanimous voice vote
B) Consider Accepting Donation from Centennial Firefighters Pg 26 -27
Relief Assn. for 2006 Safety Camp, Al Rolek
Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by O'Donnell, to accept the donation
was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
T. REPS
lcc
A) Approval to establish a drug forfeiture cash reserve fund to
to be used for law enforcement activities
Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve the
establishment of a cash reserve fund as requested was adopted by a unanimous
voice vote.
BIIC SI VICES DEPARTMENT. REPO
None
Council Agenda
3
8/28/2006
A) Consideration of Ordinance 08 -06, Rezone to Planned Unit Pg 31 -114
Development, and Resolution 06 -137, Approval of Development
Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Allocation of MUSA Reserve
for The Preserve, Integra Homes, Jeff Smyser
Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Reinert, to approve 1st reading of
Ordinance 08 -06, was adopted by the following roll call vote: Yeas, O'Donnell,
Reinert, Stoltz, Bergeson; Nays, Carlson.
Motion by Reinert, seconded by Stoltz, to approve Resolution 06 -137 was adopted
by a voice vote; Carlson voted nay.
B) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -139, Approving City of Lino Pg 115 -116
Lakes Right of Way Plat No. 3, Lake Drive /35W Interchange
Reconstruction, Michael Grochala
Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by O'Donnell, to approve Resolution No.
06 -139, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
C) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -140, Authorizing Acquisition Pg 117 -120
of Tax Forfeit Properties, Michael Grochala
Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Reinert,to approve Resolution
No. 06 -140, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
D) Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -141, Approving Classification Pg 121 -125
and Sale of Tax Forfeit Properties, Michael Grochala
Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by Stoltz, to approve Resolution No.
06 -141, was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
SUS NE
A) None.
A) Consider approval of August 7, 2006 Council Work Session
Minutes Council Member Stoltz absent
Pg 126 -128
Action Taken: Motion by Carlson, seconded by Reinert, to approve the minutes of
August 7, 2006 was adopted by a unanimous voice vote; Council Member Stoltz
abstained.
Council Agenda
4
8/28/2006
Community Calendar - A Look Ahead
August 29- September 11, 2006
Monday, September 4
Wednesday, September 6
Wednesday, September 6
City Hall closed
4:30 p.m.
7:30 p.m.
Labor Day
Council Work Session
(rescheduled from 9/4)
Officer Shawn Silvera
Memorial Vigil (City Hall
courtyard)
ti
Action Taken: Motion by Reinert, seconded by O'Donnell to adjourn at 8:48 p.m.
was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.
•
EXPENDITURES
AUGUST 28, 2006
•
•
Date: 08/10/2006 Time: 13:41:47
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (r) 5639 - 5639
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Options: Detail / Summary: s
Sort: N
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Check Over Expend: N
Vendor # Name Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000057 PREMIUM WATERS, INC.
1 17.55 17.55 .00 .00
000256 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY
1 121.55 121.55 .00 .00
000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #5
1 814.63 814.63 .00 .00
000543 TSM DEVELOPMENT
2 40,317.08 40,317.08 .00 .00
000566 ARONES, DONNA
1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00
000569 JENKINS, LORI
1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
000570 LOUGHREY, MICHELLE
1 89.00 89.00 .00 .00
000571 LUNDGREN, CINDY
1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
000572 MCA CHERYL
1 89.00 89.00 .00 .00
000824 HARTHORN, KAREN
1 89.00 89.00 .00 .00
001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY
1 4,097.38 4,097.38 .00 .00
001559 FRANCIS, LINDA
1111008 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC.
1 851.00 851.00 .00 .00
1 74.53 74.53 .00 .00
002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES
1 75,452.70 75,452.70 .00 .00
002694 AMERICAN MESSAGING
1 26.82 26.82 .00 .00
002700 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO, INC.
1 731.83 731.83 .00 .00
002931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER
1 246.42 246.42 .00 .00
003250 XCEL ENERGY
1 11,532.87 11,532.87 .00 .00
003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 198.70
198.70 .00 .00
004040 SMITH, PEG
1 251.87 251.87
.00 .00
004560
U S BANK
1 3,337.40 3,337.40 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 22 138,484.33 138,484.33
.00 .DO"
•
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:42:16 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
•
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 5641 - 5641
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: JAL Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A
# of copies: 1
Sort: N Check Over Expend: N
Vendor # Name Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000022 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY, INC. 1 96.36 96.36
.00 .00
000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 501.11 501.11
.00 .00
000100 AID ELEUTRIC SERVICE, INC. 2 357.92 357.92
.00 .00
000107 R & D BATTERIES, INC. 1 78.62 78.62
.00 .00
000150 ANOKA COUNTY FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1 366.55 366.55
.00 .00
000160 ALLIED BLACKTOP, INC. 1 108,432.67 108,432.67
.00 .00
000162 BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 1 108.00
108.00 .00 .00
000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 269.04 269.04
.00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER & SUPPLY, INC. 3 94.68 94.68
.00 .00
000234 W.B. MILLER, INC. 1 9,595.14 9,595.14
.00 .00
000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 180.50 180.50
.00 .00
000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 95.53
95.53 .00 .00
1111154 SWENSON, DAVE 1 60.00
60.00 .00 .00
000370 CENTRAL COMMUINICATIONS 2 1,511.20 1,511.20
.00 .00
000411 BESSWENGER'S DO IT BEST 1 140.14
140.14 .00 .00
000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 46.00 46.00
.00 .00
000445 DOEGE, ROBIN 1 45.00
45.00 .00 .00
000449 RIVERBANK ARTS, LLC 1 680.00 680.00
.00 .00
000472 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. 1 120.38 120.38
.00 .00
000571 LUNDGREN, CINDY 1 45.00
45.00 .00 .00
000573 BRENGMAN, SHERI 1 60.00 60.00
.00 .00
000574 YAHOO! CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS 1 20.39 20.39
.00 .00
•
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:42:16
City of Lino Lakes Operator: JAL
Page: 2
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Vendor # Name Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
75 ALBERT, PHILIP 1
55.00 55.00 .00 .00
000577 REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY
1 400.00 400.00 .00 .00
000579 BARNETT, JANE
1 95.00 95.00 .00 .00
000581 CARLSON, JAMIE
1 40.00 40.00 .00
.00
000582 CARLSON, BRYAN
1 15.00 15.00 .00 .00
000588 CARLSON, SANDRA
1 71.00 71.00 .00 .00
000594 DOSCH, J3NNY
1 55.00 55.00 .00
.00
000596 FRIED, SUE
1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
000597 HRONSKI, LISA
1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00
000600 HERMANSON, JESSICA
1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00
000601 LAKOWICH, SUSAN
1 55.00 55.00 .00
.00
000605 MCGENNIS, JESSICA
1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00
000607 MEIER, DEB
1 140.00 140.00 .00 .00
000613 MOC, CHRISTINE
1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00
000616 NELSON, ANDY
1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
000618 OWEN, MELODY
1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00
000619 PLOMBON, MARK
•22 PETERS, DONNA
1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00
1 95.00 95.00 .00 .00
000625 PARSON, KATHY
1 55.00 55.00 .00 .00
000626 ROSS, ANGELA
1 162.00 162.00 .00 .00
000629 SHARAFUDDIN, ESAM
1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00
000633 SCHWARTZ, KAREN
1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
000637 STAUTER, RICK
1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
000639 WOODCOCK, MARK
1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00
000641 WRIGHT, EVELYN
1 65.00 65.00 .00 .00
000677 PHILIP'S TREE CARE
1 1,989.56 1,989.56 .00 .00
000685 BILL'S GUN SHOP /RANGE -BJAM, INC.
1 57.51 57.51 .00 .00
•
Date: 08/17/2006 Time 13:42:16
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 3
Vendor # Name Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
•72 FILTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
1 262.05 262.05 .00 .00
000821 HOCH, ELI
1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00
000861 BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SERVICE
1 85.00 85.00 .00 .00
000880 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.
1 306.19 306.19 .00 .00
000900 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. 1 458.98
458.98 .00 .00
000913 TAHO SPORTSWEAR, INC. /SATURN SCREENPRINT
1 151.95 151.95 .00 .00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
1 29.78 29.78 .00 .00
000950 C. W. HOULE, INC.
1 7,200.00 7,200.00 .00 .00
000972 GATES, BRENDA
1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
000998 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES, INC.
1 792.95 792.95 .00 .00
001000 CATCO PARTS, INC.
1 13.10 13.10 .00 .00
001008 COLUMBUS, TOWN OF
1 3,224.00 3,224.00 .00 .00
001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
2 126,972.50 126,972.50 .00 .00
001048 HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC.
2 497.89 497.89 .00 .00
001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE
1 78.00 78.00 .00 .00
001260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS
1 154.50 154.50 .00 .00
001267 FAST BREAK CORNER MARKET, INC.
1 52.69 52.69 .00 .00
•70 DALCO, INC.
2 303.18 303.18 .00 .00
001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC.
2 8,592.35 8,592.35 .00 .00
001360 E. L. REINHARDT COMPANY, INC.
1 227.11 227.11 .00 .00
001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC.
1 59.02 59.02 .00 .00
001480 HAWKINS INC.
2 8,862.65 8,862.65 .00 .00
001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.
1 246.34 246.34 .00 .00
001621 GREG LARSON SPORTS - GLS, INC.
2 942.71 942.71 .00 .00
001680 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC.
1 604.65 604.65 .00 .00
001880 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC.
1 9.41 9.41
.00 .00
002178 WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1 396.29 396.29 .00 .00
•
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:42:16
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 4
Vendor # Name Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
•30 DIVINE, MARY
1 56.46 56.46 .00 .00
002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
2 101,770.00 101,770.00 .00 .00
002324 LEROY J. HOULE CONTRACTING
1 1,800.00 1,800.00 .00 .00
002332 LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC.
3 22,777.05 22,777.05 .00 .00
002387 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, INC.
1 18.05 18.05 .00 .00
002389 MUNICIPAL CLERKS /FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCI
1 35.00 35.00
.00 .00
002440 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE, INC.
1 4,421.06 4,421.06 .00 .00
002980 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION
1 380.00 380.00 .00 .00
003123 NATURE CALLS, INC.
1 969.75 969.75 .00 .00
003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC.
1 174.93 174.93 .00 .00
003220 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY, INC.
3 651.31 651.31 .00 .00
003250 XCEL ENERGY
1 282.23 282.23 .00 .00
003271 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
1 14.47 14.47
.00 .00
003300 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LANDSCAPING
1 658.00 658.00 .00 .00
003443 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER, INC.
1 642.68 642.68 .00 .00
003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.
2 207.35 207.35 .00 .00
003617 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
1 117.15 117.15 .00 .00
•80 SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC.
5 63,553.63 63,553.63 .00 .00
003882 SHRED -IT, INC.
1 55.75 55.75
.00 .00
004244 MINNESOTA EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION
1 50.00 50.00
.00 .00
004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC.
2 3,832.60 3,832.60 .00 .00
004350 T.K.D.A.
1 1,879.17 1,879.17 .00 .00
004370 TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC
1 550.00 550.00 .00 .00
004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC
2 487.50 487.50 .00 .00
004540 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO., INC.
1 105.00 105.00 .00 .00
004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS /HUGHES SUPPLY, INC.
2 1,302.17 1,302.17 .00 .00
004761 INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
1 145.00 145.00 .00 .00
•
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:42:17
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: JAL Page: 5
Vendor # Name Discount
# of items Net Gross Discount Lost
1111012 BARTELL, JULIE
1 31.79 31.79 .00 .00
005032 CENTRAL WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
1 1,272.68 1,272.68 .00 .00
007137 FITZPATRICK, PAMELA
1 39.00 39.00 .00 .00
007141 JONES, ANGIE
1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00
007148 NARDECCHIA, JULIE
1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00
900235 CENTERVILLE, CITY OF
1 75,000.00 75,000.00 .00 .00
900491 ROSEVILLE, CITY OF
1 1,666.67 1,666.67 .00 .00
900494 NORTHERN ESCROW, INC.
1 82,460.95 82,460.95 .00 .00
Grand Totals: 134 654,874.99 654,874.99
.00 .00*
•
•
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:39:27
*es:
Options:
Operator: JAL
Page: 1
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Fund:
Dept Id:
Program:
Vendor #:
Invoice #:
Schedule Journal #:
Bank #:
Cash #:
Payroll Check Dates:
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(R) 5640 5647
(A)
(A)
(A)
Print: D
Report Format: 1
# of copies: 1
Total By Account: Y
Check # Vendor Alpha Name
Sort: D
Print Ranges /Options: Y
Process Payroll: N
Page on Sort: N
Description
Dept Amount
77446 AFSCME COUNCIL #5
O ALBERT, PHILIP
0 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A
0 ANOKA COUNTY
77448 ARONES, DONNA
0 BARNETT, JANE
O BRENGMAN, SHERI
0 CARLSON, BRYAN
O CARLSON, JAMIE
O CARLSON, SANDRA
O CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI
O DOEGE, ROBIN
O DOSCH, J3NNY
O FITZPATRICK, PAMELA
O FRIED, SUE
O GATES, BRENDA
11111r53 HARTHORN, KAREN
O HERMANSON, JESSICA
O HOCH, ELI
O HRONSKI, LISA
77454 JENKINS, LORI
0 JONES, ANGIE
O LAKOWICH, SUSAN
77455 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
77456 LOUGHREY, MICHELLE
O LUNDGREN, CINDY
77457 LUNDGREN, CINDY
77458 MCCARGAR, CHERYL
O MCGENNIS, JESSICA
77459 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT
77460 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYME
O MOC, CHRISTINE
O NARDECCHIA, JULIE
O NELSON, ANDY
O OWEN, MELODY
•
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 814.63
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 55.00
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING /SEPT * * * * * * ** 269.04
FILING FEE * * * * * * ** 46.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 55.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM AEC * * * * * * ** 95.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 60.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 15.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 40.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 71.00
REIMBURSE DEFIB UNITS * * * * * * ** 6,591.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 45.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 55.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 39.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 45.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 45.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 89.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 55.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM AEC * * * * * * ** 35.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 25.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 45.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 40.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 55.00
PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** 851.00
PREMIUM NOTICE * * * * * * ** 67,696.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 89.00
REIMBURSE PROGAM REC * * * * * * ** 45.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 45.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 89.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 55.00
JULY SAC * * * * * * ** 30,690.00
PAY WHOLD /TERRY MECKLE -0 * * * * * * ** 246.42
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 55.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 45.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 45.00
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 55.00
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:39:27 Operator: JAL
Page: 2
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
k # Vendor Alpha Name
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
77464
77465
77466
0
0
Description
Dept
Amount
PARSON, KATHY
PETERS, DONNA
PLOMBON, MARK
ROSS, ANGELA
SCHWARTZ, KAREN
SHARAFUDDIN, ESAM REIMBURSE
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
PROGRAM REC
SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICK
STAUTER, RICK
SWENSON, DAVE
TSM DEVELOPMENT
TSM DEVELOPMENT
U S BANK
WOODCOCK, MARK
WRIGHT, EVELYN
0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
0 MEIER, DEB
0
77462
77466
RIVERBANK ARTS, LLC
SAM'S CLUB, INC.
U S BANK
LEGACY /JULY
RIEMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMS CONTRACTOR ESCROW/
REIMS PLAN REVIEW /7895
CONFERENCE /GORDON H
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC
Total for Dept **
PREMIUM NOTICE
Total for Dept 200
PROGRAM
REIMBURSE TOURNAMENT FEE ADULT SP
Total for Dept 202
PROGRAM REC
CUPS
CONFERENCE / GORDON H
Total for Dept 205
77462 SAM'S CLUB, INC. CUPS
Total for Dept 207
SPECIAL
SPECIAL
SPECIAL
YOUTH IN
1111/0 GREG LARSON SPORTS - G BALLS /TUBE SOCKS /SOCCER YOUTH SP
1466 U S BANK CONFERENCE / GORDON H YOUTH SP
Total for Dept 208
0 BARTELL, JULIE SUBWAY /TARGET - FINANCIAL
0 DIVINE, MARY MATERIAL FOR FLOAT
0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING /COUNCIL
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JULY 24
77466 U S BANK CONFERENCE / GORDON H
Total for Dept 401
0
0
0
0
77461
77466
•
ACCLAIM BENEFITS
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC M
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
MUNICIPAL CLERKS /FINAN
PREMIUM WATERS, INC.
U S BANK
MAYOR /CO
MAYOR /CO
MAYOR /CO
MEET MAYOR /C0
MAYOR /CO
MAYOR /CO
FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI
MEMBERSHIP /DAN T
CLERKS CONFERENCE /JULIE
MEMBERSHIP /JULIE B
MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY
CONFERENCE /GORDON H
Total for Dept 402
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
ADMINIST
55.00
55.00
95.00
162.00
45.00
20.00
139.44
45.00
60.00
38,505.37
1,811.71
130.91
25.00
65.00
149,905.52*
907.00
907.00*
140.00
140.00*
680.00
139.62
70.00
889.62*
3.53
3.53*
942.71
168.00
1,110.71*
31.79
56.46
36.00
21.45
258.00
358.08
761.78*
154.50
145.00
740.00
35.00
17.55
1,394.95
2,487.00*
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:39:27 Operator: JAL
Page: 3
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
•k # Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept
Amount
0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA
0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS,
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA
0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE
CI PREMIUM NOTICE
IN ADVERTISING /RESOLUTION 0
Total for Dept 403
CI PREMIUM NOTICE
Total for Dept 404
ELECTION
ELECTION
CABLE
SEC JULY 13 /CHARTER COMMISSI CHARTER
Total for Dept 405
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE
77463 SMITH, PEG MILEAGE JAN -JUNE
Total for Dept 406
SENIORS
SENIORS
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE FINANCE
O ROSEVILLE, CITY OF MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST FINANCE
Total for Dept 407
0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE
Total for Dept 415
0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE
O SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICK GIS SERVICES /JULY
Total for Dept 416
0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE
0 SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICK GIS SERVICES /JULY
Total for Dept 418
O AID ELECTRIC SERVICE,
•0 ANOKA COUNTY FINANCE D
O ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S
O BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN,
O BILL'S GUN SHOP /RANGE-
O CENTRAL COMMUINICATION
77450 CONNEXUS ENERGY
0 FAST BREAK CORNER MARK
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
0 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE
0 REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY
O SHRED -IT, INC.
77466 U S BANK
0 YAHOO! CUSTODIAN OF RE
CHANGE BALLAST /C D SIREN
2ND QTR SHARED COSTS /CEN
RANGE TIME
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES /IN
TARGETS /RANGE TIME
INTERNET ACCESS /JULY
MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY
CAR WASHES
PREMIUM NOTICE
ANIMAL CONTROL
TRAINING /JOEL M
DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT
CONFERENCE /GORDON H
RESPONCE TO LEGAL PROCES
Total for Dept 420
77445 M CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI QUARTERLY BUDGET
Total for Dept 421
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE TAPE RULE
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE
•
ECONOMIC
PLANNING
PLANNING
COMM DEV
COMM DEV
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
FIRE
15.00
185.90
200.90*
3.00
3.00*
229.50
229.50*
68.00
251.87
319.87*
347.00
1,666.67
2,013.67*
98.00
98.00*
265.00
1,360.00
1,625.00*
380.00
1,060.63
1,440.63*
182.00
366.55
117.15
108.00
57.51
1,511.20
21.31
52.69
16,439.00
642.68
400.00
55.75
365.95
20.39
20,340.18*
120,381.50
120,381.50*
BUILDING 7.32
BUILDING 578.00
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:39:27 Operator: JAL
Page: 4
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
• k # Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept
Amount
0 TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC
0
77447
0
0
0
77450
0
0
0
0
0
AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES,
AMERICAN MESSAGING
BESSWENGER'S DO IT BES
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, I
COLUMBUS, TOWN OF
CONNEXUS ENERGY
EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS,
R & D BATTERIES, INC.
T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS
O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU
O BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SER
0 CATCO PARTS, INC.
0 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC.
0 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO
0 FRATTALLONE'5 HARDWARE
0 HARMON AUTOGLASS, INC.
0 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTION
0 HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVA
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
0 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE,
0 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, I
0 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, I
• 0
0
0
0
0
77449
77450
0
77451
0
0
77452
0
0
0
0
77462
0
0
•
ACE SOLID WASTE, INC.
AID ELECTRIC SERVICE,
AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAR
BLOOMINGTON SECURITY S
C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO
CONNEXUS ENERGY
DALCO, INC.
DEEP ROCK WATER COMPAN
E. L. REINHARDT COMPAN
FILTRATION SYSTEMS, IN
FRANCIS, LINDA
FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, I
R & D BATTERIES, INC.
SAM'S CLUB, INC.
SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR
UPDATE SEPTIC DATABASE BUILDING 550.00
Total for Dept 422 1,135.32*
CONCRETE SAND STREETS 792.95
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST STREETS 8.94
ROTARY TOOL /BATTERY STREETS 140.14
CLASS 5 STREETS 306.19
TREATMENT OF PINE STREET STREETS 3,224.00
MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY STREETS 852.31
HUNTERS RIDGE STREETS 59.02
PREMIUM NOTICE STREETS 6,496.00
STENCIL CROSSWALK STREETS 174.93
BATTERIES STREETS 29.47
ASPHALT STREETS 3,832.60
Total for Dept 430 15,916.55*
COTTER PIN /WASHERS /NUT /D FLEET
WHEEL ALIGNMENT FLEET
REFLECTIVE TAPE FLEET
GASOHOL FLEET
CERAMIC PADS FLEET
TAPE RULE FLEET
WINDSHIELD FLEET
SWITCH /NORTHERN TOOL FLEET
SPRING FLEET
PREMIUM NOTICE FLEET
SNOW PLOW REPAIR PARTS FLEET
CARE KIT FLEET
U -JOINT /FILTER /LAMP /CLEA FLEET
Total for Dept 431
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST GOVERNME
POWER SUPPLY FOR CARD RE GOVERNME
MAT RENTAL GOVERNME
KEYS CUT GOVERNME
CLIPBOARD GOVERNME
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY GOVERNME
MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY GOVERNME
TOWELS /TISSUE /MOP GOVERNME
MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY GOVERNME
FRONT STRIKE /LOCK GOVERNME
FILTERS GOVERNME
MOUSE /2 GOVERNME
TAPE RULE GOVERNME
PREMIUM NOTICE GOVERNME
SERVICE /FIRE SYSTEM GOVERNME
BATTERIES GOVERNME
CUPS GOVERNME
ANNUAL FIRE SPRINKLER IN GOVERNME
MAINTANCE ON DOORS GOVERNME
43.85
85.00
13.10
8,592.35
651.31
60.43
497.89
14.47
9.41
896.00
4,421.06
18.05
458.98
15,761.90*
383.29
175.92
95.53
120.38
29.78
192.52
1,381.84
303.18
121.55
227.11
262.05
74.53
21.15
835.00
22,777.05
49.15
27.95
380.00
105.00
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:39:27 Operator: JAL
Page: 5
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
•k# Vendor Alpha Name
Description
Dept
Amount
77466 U S BANK
77467 XCEL ENERGY
0
77449
0
0
77450
0
0
0
0
CONFERENCE /GORDON H
MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY
Total for Dept 432
ACE SOLID WASTE, INC.
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO
CENTRAL WOOD PRODUCTS,
CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI
CONNEXUS ENERGY
FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI
NATURE CALLS, INC.
PHILIP'S TREE CARE
MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST
MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY
RESTEP CERTIFIED PLAYGRO
STAMPS
MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY
TAPE RULE
PREMIUM NOTICE
PORTABLE RESTROOMS
SPRAY TREES
Total for Dept 450
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE
77462 SAM'S CLUB, INC. CUPS
77466 U S BANK CONFERENCE /GORDON H
Total for Dept 451
GOVERNME
GOVERNME
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
RECREATI
RECREATI
RECREATI
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE ENVIRONM
O MINNESOTA EROSION CONT REGISTRATION /MARTY A & T ENVIRONM
77466 U S BANK CONFERENCE /GORDON H ENVIRONM
Total for Dept 461
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE
O TARO SPORTSWEAR, INC./ T- SHIRTS
Total for Dept 462
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE
0 LEROY J. HOULE CONTRAC CUT DOWN /HAUL TREES -4
Total for Dept 463
O AMERICAN FASTENER & SU CAPS /NUTS
77447 AMERICAN MESSAGING MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST
O C. W. HOULE, INC. REPAIR VALVES /4
77449 CENTERPOINT/MINNEGASCO MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY
77450 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY
O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE TAPE RULE
O HAWKINS INC. CHEMICALS
0 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, WATER SAMPLES
O LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM
O NATIONAL WATERWORKS /Hu BATTERY
O NORTHERN WATER WORKS S PAINT
O ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY
77467 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY
Total for Dept 494
SOLID WA
SOLID WA
FORESTRY
FORESTRY
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
NOTICE WATER
PACK WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
77447 AMERICAN MESSAGING MONTHLY SERVICE /AUGUST SEWER
77450 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY SEWER
•
79.51
5,472.55
33,115.04*
117.82
17.23
1,272.68
78.00
7.99
69.96
2,375.00
969.75
1,989.56
6,897.99*
692.00
27.60
280.00
999.60*
133.00
50.00
490.00
673.00*
31.00
151.95
182.95*
187.00
1,800.00
1,987.00*
50.83
13.41
7,200.00
522.08
1,450.45
65.72
8,862.65
180.50
798.00
1,302.17
96.36
302.33
6,060.32
26,904.82*
4.47
383.48
Date: 08/17/2006 Time: 13:39:27 Operator: JAL
Page: 6
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills
Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount
0 FRATTALLONE'5 HARDWARE TAPE RULE SEWER 21.76
0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI PREMIUM NOTICE SEWER 1,755.00
77459 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT JULY SAC SEWER 44,762.70
0 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY SEWER 302.32
0 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JULY SEWER 282.23
Total for Dept 495 47,511.96*
O ALLIED BLACKTOP, INC. CONTRACTOR 2006 SEALCOAT OTHER 108,432.67
O CENTERVILLE, CITY OF MAINTENANCE ON 21ST AVEN OTHER 75,000.00
0 NORTHERN ESCROW, INC. JAY BROTHERS CONTRACTOR/ OTHER 82,460.95
0 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LA REPAIR WIRING OTHER 658.00
0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK GI5 SERVICES /JULY OTHER 60,993.56
O T.K.D.A. BIRCH STREET TRAIL /JUNE OTHER 1,879.17
0 W.B. MILLER, INC. CONATRACTOR /HOLLY DRIVE OTHER 9,595.14
O WILSON DEVELOPMENT SER ACQUISITION /RELOCATION S OTHER 396.29
Total for Dept 499 339,415.78*
•
•
Grand Total 793,359.32*
-1a-
Centennial Fire District
Check Register
8/21/2006
•
The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval:
DATE CHECK# NAME
8/17/2006 15302
8/17/2006 15303
8/17/2006 15304
8/17/2006 15305
8/17/2006 15306
8/17/2006 15307
8/17/2006 15308
8/17/2006 15309
8/17/2006 15310
8/17/2006 15311
8/17/2006 15312
8/17/2006 15313
8/17/2006 15314
8/17/2006 15315
8/17/2006 15316
•
•
Arthur Mohler
City of Lino Lakes
David Bruder
Loffier Business Systems
Office Depot
Qwest
Ross Industries, Inc.
Xcel Energy
Arthur Mohler
Circle Pines Sausage
Crown Trophy
David Bruder
Janet Haapoja
Office Depot
Ross Industries, Inc.
Total
1 of 1
- 1 6 -
ACCOUNT
42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies
42000 - Payroll Expenses
42220 - Travel, Conf., Schools
42180 - Office Supplies Expense
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
42240 - Telephone
42190 - Fire Prevention Supplies
42254 - Station 2 - Electric
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
45010 - Safety Camp Expense
AMOUNT
45.03
18,909.44
22.00
29.37
32.58
214.45
219.24
767.91
57.60
224.50
492.03
73.76
37.83
36.56
15.66
21,177.96
•
DRAFT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : August 9, 2006
TIME STARTED : 6:04 p.m.
TIME ENDED : 9:03 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Members Carlson, O'Donnell,
Reinert (6:04), Stoltz (6:43) and Mayor
Bergeson
MEMBERS ABSENT : None
Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Finance Director, Al Rolek;
Community Development Director, Mike Grochala; and Terri Heaton, Springsted
City Administrator Heitke stated the Council should determine if any of the staff
recommendations for the long -term issues would be included in the 2007 budget process.
Staff also needs to continue work on the Five Year Plan and some of the financial issues
would be included in the completion of that plan. Staff is requesting direction regarding
several of the City's funds.
Finance Director Rolek reviewed the status of the General Fund and indicated finance
strategies are important for this fund. This is the fund that is most focused upon during
the budget cycle; it is the fund that the City is most aware of and that has the most direct
tax impact. Staff recommendation is to monitor the General Fund for possible
weaknesses in the future and to employ the consultant's recommendations as needed to
curtail any unfavorable affects.
The Council indicated they are comfortable with the staff recommendation and directed
staff to set up reserves within the General Fund for possible future liabilities. It was
noted that setting up reserves will not affect the overall budget and will possibly improve
the City's rating.
The Council also directed staff to inquire about a time frame when ice time is sold for the
Super Rink. Staff will also bring back recommended policies regarding borrowing from
other funds and repayment of those loans.
Finance Director Rolek referred to the Facilities Replacement and Maintenance Fund
noting the major source flowing into this fund is from the antenna lease revenues - about
$105,000 — 110,000 per year. Staff recommends these funds be dedicated to the
maintenance and repair and the eventual replacement of City building facilities. This
amount can be supplemented with tax revenues in future years.
The Council concurred with the staff recommendation regarding the Facilities
Replacement and Maintenance Fund.
•
•
•
COUNCIL FINANCIAL RETREAT AUGUST 9, 2006 —
DRAFT
Finance Director Rolek advised following the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) for
maintenance and reconstruction of the City's road infrastructure would save 511,000,000
over the next 10 years. Following the plan would also improve the average condition of
the road system and spread the costs of maintenance and replacement more gradually
though the use of debt financing. This has been an area that has been among the first to
cut out in the annual budgets when the City is looking for effective areas to cut; however,
it is also among the greatest future cost impacts if not addressed as needed. The Charter
provisions relative to funding street reconstruction further inhibit the Council's ability to
initiate and complete these projects.
Finance Director Rolek advised the Council should recognize road maintenance and
repair as a priority to avoid sharp increases in cost and tax impact in the future. Staff
recommends budgeting annual road maintenance (seal coating, overlay, etc.) at the
recommended level stated in the PMP, and to take a proactive approach to addressing
necessary reconstruction projects, perhaps through a strong education and communication
effort.
Finance Director Rolek reviewed the history of the SAC Revolving Fund. He stated the
potential impact of this liability on the City in the future would be quite heavy at over
one -half million dollars. The only sources available to relieve the liability are utility fees
or property tax revenue. In any case, it falls on all other residents of the City to pay the
difference in SAC costs attributable to these properties. Staff recognizes that residents
were given an option in the past, that properties have changed ownership over time, and
that it may be many years before sewer service is available for these properties, or maybe
never. However, given the potential magnitude of this liability, staff recommends that
these property owners be made aware of the situation and that a refund be issued to the
affected property owners, thereby eliminating the potential liability.
The Council directed staff to obtain an opinion from the City Attorney regarding issuing
refunds. If there are no legal issues, staff should proceed with the refunds with a one -year
option for the affected residents.
Finance Director Rolek advised in terms of the Dedicated Parks Fund, staff is
recommending establishing a repayment plan for the interfund loan for the 67 -acre parcel
of property purchased for a recreational facility. An outright transfer of the funds would
not be an appropriate use of the Area and Unit Funds, which were collected to implement
trunk sewer and water facilities. In addition, the Area and Unit Fund is having its own
financial challenges. Therefore, a repayment plan seems to fit best. The loan can be
repaid over a 10 -15 year period with a moderate rate of interest. There will be an impact
on the rate of park development over this time frame due to this plan. If, at some point in
the future, it is determined that the City should divest itself of this property, the proceeds
would flow to the Dedicated Parks Fund for use of repaying any unpaid loan balance or in
any of the remaining City parks.
•
COUNCIL FINANCIAL RETREAT AUGUST 9, 2006 —
DRAFT
The Council directed staff to further investigate options for repayment of the loan
including increased Park Dedication fees, valuation of the land and possibly selling a
portion of it and other revenue sources.
Finance Director Rolek provided the background of the Storm Management Fund noting
it is clear that the use of storm water development fees for maintenance purposes is not an
appropriate or intended use of these funds. It is also clear that there are ever - increasing
regulations relative to surface water standards and the clean water act. These are
unfunded mandates, which the City will need to find a way to fund.
Finance Director Rolek advised staff is recommending that a permanent funding source
be established to pay for ongoing maintenance of this storm water system. Because there
is equity to the system where those who have the most impervious surfaces have the most
runoff and should pay the most, and vice - versa, staff is recommending continuing to
pursue a storm water utility. It is the most equitable — though not perfectly equitable —
method to finance maintenance of this system. If the utility is not implemented, property
taxes will need to be levied to maintain the system. The costs are there and they are real;
the only question is how to pay them. Staff feels a storm water utility is the best way at
this time.
The Council agreed staff should continue exploring the possibility of a storm water utility
that includes an educational plan for residents as well as more equitable ways to
implement the plan such as assessments. Council also requested staff look into possible
grants as a way to offset those costs.
Finance Director Rolek referred to the Area and Unit Fund noting the sharp decline in
fund balance over the last five years. It is clear that this fund no longer has the capacity to
carry capital improvement projects until an event occurs that triggers payment of hook -up
and trunk fees. In the absence of a large infusion of capital from a future development,
the full cost of projects, Less oversizing and City -borne costs, must be assessed to
benefited properties.
Finance Director Rolek stated staff is in the process of collecting policies used in other
communities to model a new policy for consideration by the City Council. This is an
important issue that needs to be addressed and changed in order to maintain the integrity
of this fund and to continue to service debt attributable to this fund.
The Council directed staff to continue collecting other city policies and bring forward a
recommendation. The Council also requested information regarding the amount of
deferred assessments and a timetable relating to those assessments.
Finance Director Rolek advised staff would like Springsted to conduct a Utility Rate
Study.
3
•
•
•
COUNCIL FINANCIAL, RETREAT AUGUST 9, 2006 — -{
DRAFT
The Council determined the August 16, Finance Work Session would be rescheduled to
allow staff ample time to obtain more information regarding the above issues.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:03 p.m.
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
August 28, 2006.
City Clerk, Julianne Bartell John Bergeson, Mayor
Transcribed by:
Kim Points
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
4
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
DRAFT
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
AUGUST 14, 2006
DATE : August 14, 2006
TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m.
TIME ENDED : 6:55 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Carlson, O'Donnell, Reinert,
Stoltz and Mayor Bergeson
MEMBERS ABSENT : None
Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; Community
Development Director, Mike Grochala; Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia (part); City Engineer, Jim
Studenski; Director of Administration, Dan Tesch (part); Economic Development Coordinator, Mary
Alice Divine; and City Clerk, Julie Bartell
OPEN MIKE
No one was present for open mike.
SETTING THE AGENDA
Item 6A, Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -53, Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Drive
Through Facility and Restaurant Outdoor Dining Facilities, Millers Crossroads Center — This item
was removed from the agenda at the request of the applicant.
Item 1H, Consider Resolution No. 06 -133, Supporting Local Road Improvement Program Funding
Application Submittal — this item was moved to Item 8A under New Business.
The agenda was approved as amended.
CONSENT AGENDA
Council Member Carlson moved to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Council Member
O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
ITEM ACTION
Consideration of Expenditures:
August 14, 2006 (Check No. 77261 —
77444, $816,493.07) Approved
Centennial Fire District (Check No.
1
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
15278 — 15301, $3,581.58) Approved
Resolution No. 06 -124, Application for Lawful
Gambling Exempt Permit for PACE/USW Local
#264 Golf Tournament Gun Raffle at Chomonix
Golf Course
Approved
Resolution No. 06 -125, Special Event Permit,
Temporary 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor (Beer)
License and Cabaret License for SandBurr Days,
September 9 and 10 Approved
Resolution No. 06 -134, Approving Election
Judge Appointments Approved
July 24, 2006 Council Work Session Minutes Approved
July 24, 2006 City Council Meeting Minutes Approved
Accepting Donation from Centennial Firefighters
Relief Assn. for Replacement of Defibrillators in
Centennial Schools
Resolution No. 06 -131, Approving Change Order
No. 4 and Final Payment No. 10, Holly Drive
Improvements
Resolution No. 06 -135, Approving Application to
Conduct Off -Site Gambling and Temporary On -Sale
Liquor License for Lino Lakes Lions Club Lino Lakes
Lions Pheasant Feed at St. Joseph's Church
Approved
Approved
Approved
AUGUST 14, 2006
FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK
There was no report from the Finance Department.
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH
Consider LELS (Sergeants) Contract, Dan Tesch — Director of Administration Tesch advised the
City has come to an agreement for a two -year contract with L.E.L.S. — the Sergeant's bargaining unit.
The contract calls for 3% wage increases for the two years of the contract and includes the same
health insurance language the City has for all other employees.
Council Member Stoltz moved to approve the L.E.L.S. (Sergeant) Contract, 2006 -2007, as presented.
Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
2
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
AUGUST 14, 2006
Consider Resolutions No. 06 -126 through 129, Approving Special Event Requests for Various
Events being Held in Conjunction with the Blue Heron Days (carnival, pole vaulting, American
Legion picnic, and VFW outdoor event), Julie Bartell — City Clerk Bartell stated the annual Lino
Lakes community festival, Blue Heron Days, is scheduled for the weekend of August 18 -20, 2006.
The community festival planning committee presented the City with a final schedule of events
enabling staff to review those activities for the festival weekend.
City Clerk Bartell advised the City has received four additional special event permit applications for
the Children's Carnival, pole vaulting, family picnic at the American Legion and food, fun and games
at the Circle Lex VFW. She noted the pole - vaulting event (Res. No. 06 -127) has been cancelled.
City Administrating Heitke noted the City Council would be participating in the parade on Saturday,
August 19, 2006.
Council Member Reinert moved to approve Resolution No. 06 -126, Resolution No. 06 -128, and
Resolution No. 06 -129, as presented. Council Member Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA
National Night Out Proclamation — Chief Pecchia advised National Night Out was designed to
heighten crime and drug prevention awareness, generate support and participation in local anticrime
efforts, strengthen neighborhood spirit and police - community relations and send a message to
criminals letting them know ,neighborhoods are organized and fighting back.
Chief Pecchia read the National Night Out Proclamation and requested the Council acknowledge the
citizens of Lino Lakes for their support of National Night Out.
Council Member Carlson moved to approve and support the National Night Out Proclamation, as
presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Consider Resolution No. 06 -122, Accepting a Donation from Final Stretch, Inc. for National
Night Out Supplies — Chief Pecchia requested the Council publicly accept and thank the Final
Stretch, Inc. for their generous donation to the City of Lino Lakes.
Council Member O'Donnell moved to approve Resolution No. 06 -122, as presented. Council
Member Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Consider Resolution No. 06 -123, Accepting a Donation from Target for National Night Out
Supplies — Chief Pecchia requested the Council publicly accept and thank Target for their general
donation to the City of Lino Lakes.
Council Member Carlson moved to approve Resolution No. 06 -123, as presented. Council Member
Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
3
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
AUGUST 14, 2006
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER
There was no report from the Public Service Department.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA
Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -53, Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Drive Through
Facility and Restaurant Outdoor Dining Facilities, Millers Crossroads Shopping Center, Jeff
Smyser — Upon adoption of the agenda, this item was removed.
Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -132, Amendment to the Development Agreement Between
the City of Lino Lakes and the YMCA to Provide for the Disbursement of Community
Development Block Grant (CBDG), Mary Divine — Economic Development Coordinator Divine
stated the Council entered into a development agreement with the YMCA of Greater St. Paul in June
2005, which was subsequently amended in March of 2006. The purpose of the agreement was to
enter into a financial partnership with the YMCA to build a facility in Lino Lakes.
Economic Development Coordinator Divine stated previous to that in July 2004, the City, on behalf
of the YMCA, entered into an agreement with the Anoka County Housing and Redevelopment
Authority for a $150,000 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the purposes of
including a teen center in the YMCA.
Economic Development Coordinator Divine stated the YMCA has now raised funds to begin
construction. All necessary documentation has been provided to Anoka County HRA, allowing the
CDBG funds to be disbursed.
Economic Development Coordinator Divine advised the resolution authorizes an addendum to the
development agreement with the YMCA to provide for disbursement of the grant funds through the
City of Lino Lakes by reducing costs of fees associated with the construction of the facility.
Council Member Stoltz moved to approve Resolution No. 06 -132, as presented. Council Member
O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no Unfinished Business.
NEW BUSINESS
Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -133, Supporting Local Road Improvement Funding
Application — Lake Drive (CSAH 23)/35W Interchange — Community Development Director
Grochala stated in 2006 the State Legislature appropriated $16 million into the Local Road
Improvement Program, including approximately $7.5 million in the Routes of Regional Significance
Account. The Routes of Regional Significance Account is used as a grant for expenditures as
4
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
AUGUST 14, 2006
specified to cities, towns, and counties to assist in paying the cost of constructing or reconstructing
city streets, county highways or town roads with statewide or regional significance that have not been
fully funded through other state, federal or local funding sources.
Community Development Director Grochala reviewed the considerations for the selection of projects
noting the maximum award amount is $500,000. Based on eligibility requirements staff believes the
City can submit a strong application for the Lake Drive project. Applications are due by September 1,
2006 with funding decisions to be made in late fall.
Council Member Reinert moved to approve Resolution No. 06 -133, as presented. Council Member
Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
COMMUNITY CALENDAR AUGUST 15, 2006 THROUGH AUGUST 28, 2006:
Blue Heron Days, August 18 -20
Budget Work Session, Monday, August 21, 2006, 5:30 p.m.
ADJOURN
There being no further business, Council Member Carlson moved to adjourn at 6:55 p.m. Council
Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, August 28, 2006.
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
Transcribed by:
Kim Points
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
5
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 1 D
STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek
MEETING DATE August 28, 2006
TOPIC Accepting Donation from Centennial Firefighters Relief
Assn. to Defray Cost of Annual Safety Camp
Simple Majority
VOTE REQUIRED
As has been done in past years, the Centennial Fire Relief Association has made a contribution to
the Centennial Fire District to defray the cost of the annual Safety Camp. The method of funding
for this is through charitable gambling proceeds. Because the Centennial Fire District is a joint
powers entity, it has no statutory authority to fix its own budget. This function is performed by
each entity participating in the joint powers agreement. Therefore, it cannot accept the charitable
gambling proceeds directly (a memo from Fire Chief Bennett is attached). In the past, the
charitable gambling proceeds have been donated to and accepted by the City of Lino Lakes, as a
participant in the joint powers agreement, and a check in the same amount was issued to the
Centennial Fire District for the purchase. In remaining consistent with past practice, staff's
recommendation is to accept the donation of charitable gambling proceeds from the Centennial
Firefighters Relief Association in the amount of $1,500 and authorize the issuance of a check in
the amount of $1,500 to the Centennial Fire District to be used for the annual Safety Camp. This
transaction will have no net affect on the City's 2006 budget.
1.
Accept the donation of charitable gambling proceeds from the Centennial Firefighters
Relief Association in the amount of $1,500 and authorize the issuance of a check in the
amount of $1,500 to the Centennial Fire District to defray the cost of the annual Safety
Camp.
2. Refer to Staff for further review.
3. Decline the donation of charitable gambling proceeds.
Option 1
A -3
-26-
•
•
Centennial Fire District
7741 Lake Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
651 -784 -7472
MEMO
Date: August 17, 2006
To: Lino Lakes Finance Department
From: Milo Bennett
Subject: Safety Camp Donation
Attached you will find a check for $1,500 from the Centennial Relief Association
that is to help fund the 2006 Safety Camp.
This check needs to be accepted by the City of Lino Lakes and then a check for
$1,500 needs to be written to the Centennial Fire District, which has the funds for
the Safety Camp.
This pass through is required because Minnesota charitable gambling rules do not
allow the Fire District to accept contributions directly from charitable gambling.
• AGENDA ITEM
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND:
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
August 28, 2006
Consider Adoption of Resolution No. 06 -138,
Authorizing a new off -sale liquor license and
tobacco license, for Brownstone Liquors, Inc.
d /b /a MGM Wines & Spirits, at 709 Apollo Drive
Simple Majority (3/5 Vote Required)
An application has been submitted by Brownstone Liquors, Inc., d /b /a MGM Wine
& Spirits, for a new off -sale liquor and tobacco license for a store to be located at
709 Apollo Drive (existing building within Lino Lakes Marketplace development).
The application is complete, the related fees have been paid, including
investigation fees, and insurance information has been provided to the City as
required.
The Lino Lakes Police Department has conducted a background investigation
relative to this application and found no information on the principal applicant that
would give a specific reason to deny the application.
In accordance with the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances, Section 701 relating to
Liquor Licensing and Section 602 relating to Cigarette Sales, this application
requires approval by the City Council.
One concern has been raised by Community Development staff regarding this
application. The plans submitted for the liquor store don't indicate adequate
access for the deliveries the business will be receiving. The applicant will need
to demonstrate a suitable loading design as part of the building permit process.
The applicant is aware that approval is subject to all the provisions and
conditions of the laws of the city, state and federal government.
OPTIONS:
• 1. Approve Resolution No. 06 -138 authorizing issuance of new off -sale liquor
and tobacco license for Brownstone Liquors, Inc.
2. Deny Resolution No. 06 -138
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -138
APPROVING ISSUANCE OF NEW OFF -SALE LIQUOR AND TOBACCO
LICENSE FOR BROWNSTONE LIQUORS, INC. AT 709 APOLLO DRIVE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes met at its regularly
scheduled meeting on August 28, 2006, and;
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council discussed approval of a new off -sale
liquor license and tobacco license for Brownstone Liquors, Inc., d /b /a MGM
Wines & Spirits to be located at 709 Apollo Drive, and;
WHEREAS, the Police Department of the City of Lino Lakes has conducted an
investigation of the applicants, and;
WHEREAS, Brownstone Liquors, Inc. is in compliance with City Code Section
701 concerning Liquor Licensing and Section 602 concerning Cigarette Sales,
and qualifies for said licenses and;
S WHEREAS, the applicant has provided proof of insurance as required and paid
the necessary fees;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino
Lakes hereby approves a new off -sale liquor license and tobacco license for
Brownstone Liquors, Inc. subject to all the fees, provisions and conditions of the
laws of the city, state and of the federal government.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 28th day of August, 2006.
ATTEST:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
•
-30-
John Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
INSERT AFTER PG 30
AGENDA ITEM 4A
STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of
Police
DATE
TOPIC
VOTE REQUIRED
August 28, 2006
Designating Forfeiture Revenues
Simple Majority
The City of Lino Lakes receives drug forfeiture funds from time to time. Based on the
State Law and the Department's Policies and Procedures these funds must be
expended for Law Enforcement purposes. Our goal is to establish a cash reserve
fund to use for the purchase of illegal drugs, flash rolls, rewards for information leading
to arrests and prosecution for serious offenders. We also anticipate using this fund to
pay informants and to proactively pursue criminals active in our community. The
monies from this fund shall only be disbursed upon the approval of the Chief of Police
or his designee. The amount and use of the funds for each transaction will be tracked
according to standard govemmental accounting practices. We will utilize $5,000 from
our existing drug forfeiture fund to establish this account.
1. Approve
2. Return to staff for further information.
Option No. 1
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6 A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
C. C. MEETING DATE: August 28, 2006
TOPIC: • Ordinance 08 -06: Rezone to Planned Unit Development
• Resolution 06 -137: Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat
and Allocation of MUSA Reserve
The Preserve
Integra Homes
BACKGROUND
Integra Homes has requested approval of single family residential development called The
Preserve. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density residential use. The northern
part of the site is within the existing MUSA and zoned R -1, but the southern part will need
MUSA and rezoning.
The Preserve project is the City's next opportunity to implement the Parks, Natural Open
Space /Greenway and Trail System Plan through the use of a conservation development. Staff
have worked with the developer to pursue our public values and conservation development goals.
The project includes restoration and preservation of quality wetlands and upland areas, and fills
in one more piece of the greenway vision.
A planned unit development (PUD) is being used on this project because standard zoning
requirements do not accommodate the natural features and the restoration plan. As with the
Foxborough (Fox Den Acres) project, the discussions have centered on the question "what is the
best design ?" rather than "does this meet all mathematical zoning requirements ?"
The project will require rezoning to planned unit development, approval of a PUD development
stage plan/preliminary plat, and three acres of MUSA reserve.
ANALYSIS
As the site exists now, it consists of two parcels, both under the same ownership The southern
parcel, which is all wetland except along the edge of Holly Drive, will not be developed. All
proposed development is on the northern parcel. The northern parcel currently is split by the
MUSA and zoning line.
Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land
use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area.
•
•
The Preserve
page 2
Location
Existing Land Use
Guided Land Use
Existing
Zoning
Site
vacant
Low Density Sewered Resid. and
Low Density Unsewered Resid.
R -1 and Rural
North
single family resid.
and large City pond
Low Density Sewered Resid.
R -1
South
wetland
Low Density Unsewered Resid.
Rural
East
City park and single
family resid.
Low Density Sewered Resid.
R -1X Planned
Development
West
vacant
Low Density Sewered Resid. and
Low Density Unsewered Resid.
R -1 and Rural
The comprehensive plan guides the northern part of the site for Low Density Sewered
Residential land use. The northern part of the site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area.
The northern 850 feet (about 2/3 of the existing north parcel) is within the existing MUSA and
currently is zoned R -1.
Two public streets and municipal water and sanitary sewer are stubbed to the site. This site has
been guided and zoned for development for many years prior to the current comprehensive plan
adopted in 2002: as far back as the 1987 comprehensive plan.
The following is a summary of the of the proposal's density:
Gross Site Area
Upland Area
Total Lots
Gross Density
Net Density
52.6 acres
15.0 acres
31
0.6 units /acre
2.1 units /acre
The proposed density complies with Low Density Sewered Residential: up to 3 units /acre.
The project requires three acres of MUSA to include the area not currently within the MUSA:
Block 4, most of Block 5, and part of the road. The project also requires rezoning to planned
unit development and approval of a PUD development stage plan/preliminary plat.
Growth Management: As a conservation development, this project is not subject to the
annual growth limits on the number of units, as stated in Ordinance 24 -04. Most of the site's
developable land is already within the current MUSA, though 3.25 acres is needed. We have
ample MUSA reserve to accommodate this small amount.
• Conservation Development: Ordinance 24 -04 amends the growth management policy to
encourage conservation development by allowing a conservation development project to exceed
•
The Preserve
page 3
the annual growth limits if it results in public values above those achievable under conventional
development. The public values in the ordinance include but are not limited to the following:
a. Preserving more natural open space than required under current ordinances and
development policies
The site includes over 37 acres of wetland, about 71% of the total property. Only
5930 sf of wetland fill is proposed. The proposal includes a restoration and
management plan that will restore and enhance large areas of the wetlands and other
open space. These areas will be placed in a permanent conservation easement.
b. Reducing the extent of impervious surfaces and size of the development footprint
Compared to standard development, road pavement will be narrower and front
setbacks reduced. This allows for house pads to be farther from wetlands.
c. Restoring /enhancing ecological systems on the site as part of the development process
The project design and a management plan include:
• preserving and protecting wet prairie remnants
• restoring native vegetation of wetlands
• removing invasive vegetation and invasive species
• re- introducing diverse, native species to wetlands
• minimizing impacts to wetlands and significant trees (as identified in tree
inventory)
• tree replacement to compensate for loss of hardwoods
• upland buffers: removing invasive species and planting native species
• serious effort to avoid significant natural features such as rare plant
populations, rare natural community remnants when designing lots and pads
d. Protecting off -site ecological systems through increased buffering
The wetlands form a large buffer from lands to the east and south The restoration
and management plan for this project includes removing invasive species and
planting and management of native species, in wetlands and upland areas..
e. Ensuring long -term natural resource stewardship through an endowment program
sponsored by the developer
The project includes a stewardship plan that includes an endowment. The financial
details will be finalized prior to final plat approval.
f. Providing public park and trail opportunities consistent with or in excess of the System
Plan
The project includes a trail within the open space areas to provide passive recreation,
appreciation of natural areas, and access to Birch Park.
g.
Managing stormwater (flow rates and quality) using natural infiltration and ecologically -
based approaches
The project includes natural infiltration as part of the design. The `treatment train'
approach includes swales, rain gardens, and infiltration ponds. This will improve
•
•
The Preserve
page 4
water quality on and off site. In addition, improving the wetlands through restoration
of native vegetation will contribute to better water quality.
h. Preserving the open space aesthetic to which community residences have become
accustomed
The project design minimizes impacts on wetlands and actually improves the
wetlands, which will be protected with a management plan.
i. Maintaining natural buffer between established and new developments.
The large wetlands along the eastern part of the site will remain as an open space
buffer for existing development.
In addition to the specific activities described in the restoration and management plan, this site is
a piece of a greenway system. This greenway is envisioned for a wetland complex that continues
south and west for over a mile, and east for a similar distance. These wetlands are part of a large
watershed along County Ditch 25, which drains a significant portion of south central Lino Lakes.
It is the same complex that covers parts of the Foxborough project, which incorporated many
conservation development elements to restore and conserve the wetlands. This ditch and wetland
system has been identified as a high value ecological area. The Foxborough project was the first
conservation development project because it was designed to accommodate and enhance this
ecological system. The Integra development can be the next piece in this larger picture.
Outlots C and D are unusual. They are configured out of what originally was going to be one
outlot. As the restoration and management plan evolved, it became evident that restoring the
entire wetland area would require far more in the way of financial resources than a project of 31
lots could provide. Therefore, the large area of wetland on the south will be broken into two
outlots. The restoration and management plan includes work for Outlot C, but work in the larger
Outlot D will not be part of this project. The plan foresees what should be done there, but
restoration of Outlot D will not occur until additional funding can be found in the future.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT
PUD: Conservation development design considers the conservation goals more important than
mathematical standards found in a zoning ordinance. A planned development provides the
flexibility needed in order to implement conservation development.
Section 2, Subd. 10.A. of the zoning ordinance discusses the purpose of a planned unit
development (PUD). In addition, Subd. 10.D. lists the purposes of an urban PUD. The
application should be compared to these purposes.
Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for
the grouping of lots or buildings for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as
opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development.
This section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the
conservation of land and open space through clustering of lots, buildings and activities, which
•
•
The Preserve
page 5
promote the goals outlined in the Comprehensive Plan or serve another public purpose. It is
further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central
management, integrated planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance
of parking, open space and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient
distribution of uses.
The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to
setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a
mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage:
1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures
through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments.
3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing
vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion.
4. A creative use of and and related physical development which allows a phased and
orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other.
5. An efficient use of and resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby
lowering development costs and public investments.
6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the
strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations.
Urban PUD Purposes:
a. Preservation of wildlife habitat and unique natural resources.
b. Reduction of negative impacts on the environment.
c. Creation of common open space that provides a unified landscape for the use and
enjoyment of the neighborhood community and /or the general public.
d. A variety of urban residential lot sizes, configurations, and neighborhoods.
Lots: The submittal includes 31 lots. In order to preserve as much open space as possible, lot
dimensions have been adjusted. Permanent open space is created behind most lots that extends
for hundreds of feet. The feeling of openness is greater, though the actual lot line depths will be
less than a standard plat.
Another means of increasing the common open space is the use of decreased setbacks. The front
setbacks for most lots will be 25 feet from the right of way rather than the normal 30 feet.
(Remember that the right of way included more land than the actual paved street.) Rear setbacks
may also be reduced in order to retain conservation areas behind some lots.
We did examine a `yield plan' that shows how the site could be developed under standard
zoning. The number of lots hasn't been affected by using conservation development.
The Preserve
page 6
411 Discussion of Outlots C and D is found above under the `Conservation Development' heading.
•
•
Streets, Access: The comprehensive plan for the community includes this site as an area to
be developed. Two roads — Kildeer Drive and Pheasant Run —are stubbed to it in previous
developments. Municipal water and sewer are stubbed in both streets. The proposed project
would extend both of these roads to serve the two separate areas of the site. Pheasant Run would
be planned to extend into the land to the west when that develops, creating an access to Old
Birch St.
Goals and policies of the comprehensive plan include a street system that connects rather than
isolates neighborhoods. This serves to create a better sense of community and provides multiple
access routes for emergency services. The long range vision includes connections through to
Old Birch St. and to the Foxborough project to the southwest. This, in turn, provides local
access to West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd St., two local collectors.
As currently proposed, the project would add 13 new homes on Kildeer Drive and 18 new homes
on Pheasant Run. This will not overburden the roadways. When and if Pheasant Run extends
west to the adjacent property, traffic generated by new development will go both directions.
The right of way width for the internal streets is 50 feet. This is less than the normal 60 feet.
The pavement width also is reduced to 28 feet rather than the standard 36 (face of curb to face of
curb). These are two more ways of increasing the open space in the project: narrowing the
rights of way allows for more open space behind the lots. The narrower pavement reduces
impervious surface. The PUD standards specifically allow the pavement to be reduced in this
way. Parking will be allowed on one side of the street only to ensure access by emergency
vehicles.
The plans include a temporary cul de sac at the western end of the Pheasant Run extension.
When the property to the west is developed, the street would be extended and the cul de sac
removed and vacated.
The Kildeer Drive extension will curve a little to the west to provide for more useable land for
lots on the east side of the road. These lots have the large pond to the east. Wet prairie
restoration will occur on the west side of the pond and the area will be within a conservation
easement.
Utilities: City water and sanitary sewer service will connect to existing facilities to the
north. One "arm" of the project will connect to Kildeer Drive facilities, the other arm will
connect to those in Pheasant Run. A water loop will connect the two.
One extremely important aspect of this project is that the City needs a new well. The plat
includes that site as Outlot A. This well site adjoins the existing Birch Park, the site listed for the
well in the City's comprehensive water system plan. Outlot A would be deeded to the City as
part of this project.
•
•
The Preserve
page 7
Lots on the south part of the development will need to have `grinder pumps' for sanitary sewer.
These are individual pumps in each house that pump wastewater to the sanitary sewer line in the
street. This is necessary because of the shallow depth of the sewer line.
Grading and Stormwater Management: The design includes infiltration methods that will
help filter water prior to running into ponds or wetlands.
No increase in runoff rate is allowed. This is a standard requirement for all development which
is enforced both the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City. The Watershed granted its
preliminary approval in September 2005. Any changes to the plan must be acceptable to the
Watershed District.
Improving water quality is an important conservation development goal. The use of rain gardens
and other methods for infiltration in this project will promote that goal. It is true that each
project makes up a relatively small area of the city. As each development project occurs, using
natural methods of managing stormwater will result in better water quality than standard
methods using only pipes and ponds. In addition, the restoration activities involved in
conservation developments such as this one actually will improve the quality of the wetlands and
result in water quality improvements.
Parks, Open Space: The comprehensive plan broadly envisions a conceptual greenway in the
area of this site. The City's "Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trails System Plan"
further describes the area for conservation planning. Creating greenways to implement the
concept presented in the comprehensive plan is the first priority of the parks and open space
plan. This will require the use of a variety of strategies, the most important of which is greater
reliance on a conservation development approach to land development.
The preservation of open space on this site will be an important step in the implementation of the
greenway vision. This is along the edge of a high value natural feature area that includes a major
drainage through the southern part of Lino Lakes. A city trail would be created as part of the
plat. The open space areas would be owned by the homeowners association and maintained as
perpetual open space through a conservation easement over the area. A public trail easement
also would wend through the open space area. The specific terms of the management plan
implementation will require detailed legal agreements, which will be worked out prior to final
platting.
Some questions arose at the P & Z Board regarding pedestrian access to and use of the park.
Discussion with the Director of Public Services yielded useful information on these issues.
There is one small baseball field in Birch Park. Programming there includes T -ball lessons and
Little League practice. It is unlikely that more than about 30 cars would be drawn to the park for
these activities. There are 18 parking spaces in the parking lot, including one handicapped space.
The parking lot will be re- striped in the near future.
Each lot will have a rain garden, which prevents a trail from being constructed along the fronts of
the lots. In addition, creating additional off - street trail segments will cost additional money. The
boardwalks in this project will use up the park dedication for the project. In fact, the cost of the
The Preserve
page 8
• boardwalks may well exceed the normal park dedication fees. The City does not have the
•
additional funds to construct additional trails.
Staff does not anticipate a safety problem based on the limited activity programmed at the park.
REZONING TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Rezoning: Our ordinance includes two ways to use a PUD. One is a conditional use permit
for a PUD, the other is a PUD rezoning. A rezoning to PUD is needed for a single family
conservation development because the conditional use permit option is not allowed in a single
family zoning district. As stated in Section 2, Subdivision 1 of the zoning ordinance (the
rezoning section), the P & Z Board considered possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning
amendment and its judgment was based upon, but not limited to, the following factors:
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of
and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan.
The comprehensive plan guides the part of the site to be built on for Low Density
Sewered Residential land use and it is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. The
comprehensive plan supports the greenway concept. The project implements the Parks,
Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trails System Plan by creating a conservation
development to provide an important segment of a larger greenway.
2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area.
Single family residential development exists to the east and north, and development of
this site would be an extension of that neighborhood to the north. Land to the west is
guided for future residential development. Development cannot occur to the south due to
extensive wetlands.
3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein.
By its very nature, a conservation development PUD creates a design and performance
standards tailored to the site itself. Some specific performance standards are listed in the
ordinance, but many are created with the project approval.
4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the City's service capacity.
Utilities are immediately available on abutting property, as are the stubbed roads.
Municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and sufficient capacity exists.
5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property.
The existing roads have the capacity for the additional development.
•
•
•
The Preserve
page 9
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
The Environmental Board reviewed the project at its April 29 meeting. Generally, the Board
recommends pursuing the conservation development approach on this site. Most of the specific
recommendations have been part of the planning of the project since the start. Other specifics
have been examined for feasibility as the project review continued. The Environmental Board
recommendations are attached.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
The P & Z reviewed the project at its May and June meetings. The Board recommended
approval of the project with conditions. The conditions are included in Resolution 06 -137.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Ordinance 08 -06 rezoning the site to Residential Planned Unit Development
2. Approve Resolution 06 -137, approving the Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and
the Allocation of MUSA reserve with conditions of approval listed in the resolution.
3. Deny the application.
RECOMMENDATION
Options 1 and 2
• Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE 08 -06
APPROVING REZONING FROM
R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND RURALTO
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD )
FOR THE PRESERVE
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain:
Section 1: Findings
The City Council makes the following findings regarding the application for rezoning the
property described below, based on the factors listed in Section 2, Subd. l E of the Lino Lakes
zoning ordinance:
1. Integra Homes submitted an application for an amendment to the zoning ordinance to rezone
land to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The currently zoning of the site is R -1, Single
Family Residential and R, Rural.
2. The proposal includes platting the site as The Preserve.
3. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of
and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan.
a. The comprehensive plan guides the part of the site to be built on for Low Density
Sewered Residential land use and it is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area.
b. Most of the portion of the site to be developed for home sites is within the existing
Metropolitan Urban Service Area, though an additional 3.5 acres of MUSA is needed.
The City has ample MUSA reserve to be allocated.
c. The comprehensive plan supports the greenway concept.
d. The project implements the Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trails System
Plan, which is part of the Comprehensive Plan, by creating a conservation development
to provide an important segment of a larger greenway.
4. The proposed use is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Single family
residential development exists to the east and north, and development of this site would be an
extension of that northern neighborhood. Land to the west is guided for future residential
development. Development cannot occur to the south due to extensive wetlands.
5. By its very nature, a conservation development PUD creates a design and performance
standards tailored to the site itself. Some specific performance standards are listed in the
•
•
•
ordinance, but many are created with the project approval. Upon compliance with the
conditions of approval set forth in Resolution 06 -137, the proposed uses will conform with
performance standards contained in the zoning ordinance and other requirements.
6. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the City's service capacity. Utilities are immediately available on abutting
property, as are the stubbed roads. Municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the
site and sufficient capacity exists.
7. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property.
Section 2
The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, passed by the City
Council on March 10, 2003 is hereby amended by rezoning from R -1, Single Family Residential
and Rural to Residential Planned Unit Development pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes, the following described real estate:
The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and that part of the West Half of the
Southeast Quarter all in Section 28, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota,
except GEMINI ESTATES and TRAPPERS CROSSING according to the recorded plats
thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota; also except that part of said quarter - quarter described as
follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said quarter - quarter; thence South 89
degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along the north line thereof 360 feet to the point
beginning; thence continuing South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north
line 388.48 feet; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West 345 feet; thence South 21 degrees
12 minutes East 166.94 feet; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 320 feet;
thence North 0 degrees 22 minutes 58 seconds East to the point of beginning; and also except
that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of
said quarter- quarter; thence South 0 degrees 33 minutes 07 seconds West along the east line
thereof 170.04 feet to Point "A'; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes30 seconds West
418.54; thence North 22 degrees 30 minutes East 183.38 feet to the north line of said quarter -
quarter; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north line 350 feet to
the point of beginning; and also except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows:
Beginning at said Point "A "; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West
272.96feet; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West 223.24 feet; thence South 89 degrees
29 minutes 30 seconds East parallel with the north line of said quarter - quarter 356.42 feet,
more or less, to the east line of said quarter - quarter; thence North 0 degrees 33 minutes 07
seconds East along said east line 207 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, except that
part thereof taken for road purposes.
AND
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Section 33, Township 31,
Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying northwest of the west right -of -way line of Holly
Drive.
Ordinance 08 -06, page 2
•
•
•
Section 3
Development shall conform with plans, requirements, and conditions of approval listed in
Resolution 06 -137 and associated information.
Section 4
As above amended, said Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously
amended.
Section 5
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according
to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2006.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2006.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Ordinance 08 -06, page 3
IIICouncil Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION 06 -137
APPROVING PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT
AND ALLOCATION OF MUSA RESERVEFOR THE PRESERVE
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings:
Findings
1. Integra Homes has submitted an application for a residential planned unit development
(PUD) and a development stage plan/preliminary plat for the PUD.
2. The site includes approximately 53 acres.
3. The comprehensive plan guides the part of the site to be built on for Low Density Sewered
Residential land use and it is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area.
4. Ordinance No. 08 -06 rezones the site from R -1, Single Family Residential and Rural to
Residential Planned Unit Development.
5. The Preserve project is a conservation development.
6. The Planning & Zoning Board opened a public hearing on the application on May 10 and
closed the hearing on June 14, 2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the
application for a planned unit development development stage plan/preliminary plat for The
Preserve.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council allocates 3 (three) acres of MUSA reserve
for the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following conditions of approval shall apply:
1. Some lots will have restricted back yards due to easements or other features of the
development plat. The developer, builders, and future property owners should be aware of
this. House structures shall only be built within the building pads on the approved plans.
• 2. Some lot lines, easements, and other features will require adjustments prior to city council
•
review of the project.
3. Streets shall be 28' face of curb to face of curb and parking shall be prohibited on one side of
the street.
4. Park dedication shall be cash with credit for construction of trails.
5. The trail corridor shall be dedicated as "park" on the final plat, not created as a separate trail
easement.
6. "The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan for
Conservation Areas" dated August 10, 2006, is included in this city council approval of the
project. This includes the tasks and cost schedule titled "The Preserve Conservation Areas
Restoration and Management Tasks, (Revised August 10, 2006 for 11.9 acre restoration
area) ".
7. The following tasks must be completed prior to grading or logging of the site:
Cutting/Removal/Herbicide Treatments (Year 1); and Oak Woodland Native Plant Salvaging
and Transplanting (Into 2.0 Acres of Woodland). The developer must demonstrate these
tasks are completed prior to grading or logging the site.
8. A permanent conservation easement shown on the plans shall be dedicated to the City. The
easement document shall describe the restoration and management plan and its funding and
implementation. The easement document shall be reviewed by the City prior to dedication of
the easement and prior to final plat approval.
9. A homeowners association shall be created. Association documents shall describe the
restoration and management plan, its funding, and its implementation. The association shall
be responsible for and shall maintain a stewardship fund to implement the restoration and
management plan for the open space areas defined by the conservation easement. The
stewardship activity shall be in accordance with the conservation easement and the approved
restoration and management plan. Association documents shall be reviewed by the City prior
to final plat approval.
10. The homeowners association shall be responsible for maintenance of the rain gardens. This
requirement shall be included in the easement covenants and restrictions document. and this
shall be included in the association documents.
11. The developer shall install signs along the conservation easement edge at side lot lines and
other locations as determined by the City. Lot owners shall not remove, alter, or damage
these signs and shall be responsible for any damage caused by owners, family, or guests.
The homeowners association shall be responsible for maintaining, repairing and, if necessary,
replacing the easement signs. This requirement shall be included in the easement covenants
and restrictions document.
Resolution 06 -137, page 2
III12. A temporary cul de sac must be constructed on the west end of the extended Pheasant Run.
•
•
13. The project must obtain applicable approvals and permits from the Rice Creek Watershed
District prior to site work beginning and must comply with all conditions thereof.
14. The City Engineer's review comments in the memos of July 25 and 27, and August 22, 2006
and previous review memos must be addressed to his satisfaction.
15. The preliminary plat is the primary plan sheet for lot configuration. Grading and other plans
shall be brought into conformance with the lot dimensions on the preliminary plat and
resubmitted for City review prior to site work beginning.
16. Review and approval of the project are based on the following plans:
Existing Features, 4/10/06, received July 14, 2006
Preliminary Plat, revised 8/13/06, received Aug 15, 2006
Preliminary Plat Inset A, revised 8/13/06, received Aug 15, 2006
Grading & Erosion Control Plan, revised 7/12/06, received July 14, 2006
Utility Plan & Profiles, received July 14, 2006
Mitigation Plan, revised 5/22/06, received July 14, 2006
Tree Preservation Plan, revised 4/10/06, received July 14, 2006
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2006.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2006.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution 06 -137, page 3
•
•
Total Per Task
Estimated Costs
o
n
o
«n
O
(0
c0
(n
w
0
O
o
N
m
w
«
O
-
v
w
O
oo_
m
en
O
o
(c
69
0
U)
co
M
0)
N
O
T
Eft
N
0
,G
4)
En
$5,355.00
$5,355.001
O
0
O
O
V
fR
$5,875.001
$5,875.001
O
0
O
O
(D
M19
O
0
O
(0
N
(0
so
0
0
O
N O
N)
49
0
0
O
(0
fA
0
0
O
O
N
(A
0
0
O
O
N
ffi
$1,593 80
O
O
O
N
M
69
$465.00
O
O
O
0)
(0
69
$4,413.60
O
N
7
O
N
fA
$1,225.00
1 $4,165.00
O
0
O
0
co-
69
0
0
O
0
—
(9
0
O
O
(
fA
0
O
O
u? 0
N
1 $1,500.00
O
O
O
o
N
fA
}/
0
1.
0)
0
U
(9
0
U
CO
d
U
(0
N
N
U
(6
CO
N
U
(o
N
E
U
(6
U)
fU
0
(6
01
N
U
CO
U1
N
0
(6
f2
U
CO
(U
0
(6
N
N
0
(0
U)
Q)
0
0
N
0
(U
U)
(U
0
0
Ell
(U
0
(4
(U
0
(9
(1,0
CO
1(1_2,
(0
U)
N
0
CO
(n
U
Q
0)
0)
r
r
r
(n
(0
(n
r)
r)
(0
r)
r)
r)
r
U
Q
d
a
N
U
N
N
N
U
CO
N
N
U
0
Q
a
N
U
0
N
a
(
N
0
N
a
U
N
a
N
U (0
N
a
N
U
N
a
N
U
N
a
U
U
N
a
N
U
6
N
a
N
U
0
U)
a
N
U
0
8
a
N
U
0
N
a
0
0
N
a
`
0
0
U
a
0
U
0
U
0.
f2.02
0
U)
a
U N
(6
0
0.
N
0
U
0
(0
V
69
0
(0
V'
69
0
0
O
(")
fA
0
(0
N
co
0
(0
N
63
0
0
N
.-
49
0
0
r
fA
0
O
r
Vi
0
0
N
69
0
0
r
63
0
0
r
fA
CO
N
N
fA
0
O
V
ffi
0
(0
(0
fH
0
O
CO
N
fR
(O
N
N
69
(D
N
N
69
(0
N
N_
69
0
(f)
a,
63
0
0
0
V
69
1The Preserve's Conservation Areas
N
-SC
U)
IC
H
w
C
0)
E
0
as
C
c�
C
C
C
Y
L
0
4.(
N
N�
N
((Revised August 10, 2006 for 11.9 acre restoration area)
1Prescribed Burning (Wetlands and Upland Fringes):
1First Burn (Year 2: 11.9 Acres) 1
('
a
Q
Q)
(a
i
•
•
SITE LOCATION
as"
Birch Street
REG LAND
SURVEY
NO 112
A
Foxborough
site
•
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN (detail)
LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
&. ■
Low Density ■ 111
Sewered Residential ■ r
• ■>•. t 1'
MUSA line
2010 Growth
Area Border?
Foxboroirgh site
Low Density 1
Unsewered •
Residential •
•
•
•
•
ZONING MAP (detail)
•
•
Foxborough
site
•
■
■
1
•
•
•
PARK, GREENWAY, & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN (detail)
CI rtNe Ntl•
I -
• • 51ai I. •
0 t,i 7,:mk
0 Nte,g
;AA kst‘t3ctt.t.k 11.1.tt t. ttlaittl
Trod
A/
rkre..
C I T 0 f
ANOLAKES
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
To:
Copies To:
From:
Date:
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292-4400
(651) 292 -0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: The Preserve Development
City Engineer Site Review
Thomas D. Prew, P.E.
August 22, 2006
Proj. No.:
Routing:
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
13604.009
The following site review is based on these submittals:
1. Plat sheets dated August 13, 2006 and July 27, 2006.
2. Plan sheets C.4.03 dated July 28, 2006, C.8.01 dated July 6, 2006, and C.8.02 dated July 13, 2006.
Plat Comments:
1. All items have been addressed.
Retaining Wall Cross- Section Comments:
1. Engineering calculations and fencing must be provided for all retaining walls greater than 4' in height.
2. City of Lino Lakes Public Works has requested that a W -Beam Guardrail (Mn/DOT Standard Plate
8307) be installed in retaining wall areas adjacent to the roadway.
3. Guard rail must be a minimum of 5 feet from back of curb.
4. Guard rail must be extended 25 feet beyond end of all retaining walls.
5. Provide stationing for all retaining wall and guard rail termini and offsets from centerline.
6. A typical section must be provided for the retaining wall area.
7. Retaining wall to meet Mn/DOT Standard Plan.
Additional Comments:
1. All items per TKDA review dated July 27, 2006 must be addressed.
2. Standard Details are acceptable and must be included within Final Plan Set.
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
TKDA
• ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
To: James E. Studenski, P.E.
City Engineer
Copies To:
From: Thomas D. Prew, P.E.
Date: July 27, 2006
The following site review is based on these submittals:
1.
1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292-4400
(651) 292 -0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
Reference: The Preserve Development
Site Review
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
13604.009
Proj. No.:
Routing:
Revised Site Development Plans, submitted by MFRA, dated July 13, 2006.
2. Letter from Environmental One Corporation, dated June 21, 2006.
Street and Trail Comments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Typical section is not included in this plan set.
Standard bituminous mix specifications should reference Mn/DOT 2360 for trail.
Label radii for all horizontal curves.
A 20' minimum must be provided for all intersection radii (includes throat of cul -de- sacs).
Show taper for connection to existing street widths.
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Comments:
1. Details must be provided in conformance to City Standards.
2. Minimum separation from 3' x 6' box culvert of 3' must be labeled on plan.
3. Indicate the type of casing pipe to be installed.
4. The watermain installed through the wetland area must be approved by the RCWD.
5. Tracer wire and surface markers must be installed for all HDPE pipe.
6. Illustrate wetland depths on profile.
7. Each entire building pad must be covered by a 250' radius to a hydrant. Please refer to the letter from
Centennial Fire District, dated April 18, 2006.
8. The pressure rating and inclusion of tracer wire for the sanitary FM must be noted on the plans.
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
The Preserve Development
Site Review
•City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
July 27, 2006
Page 2
•
9. Curb stops must be installed at the property line for all services to be connected to grinder pumps.
10. Watermain and sanitary sewer mainline must have a minimum 18" of separation on Killdeer Drive for
service crossings.
11. The sanitary FM must be 18" lower than the watermain to allow adequate separation for service
crossings.
Storm Sewer and Drainage Comments:
1. Clarify the difference shown on the Grading Plan between the GFE and the Ground Elevation.
2. Show storm sewer line work and directional arrows on all storm sewer plan views.
3. See attached TKDA Drainage Review, dated July 25, 2006, for drainage comments to be addressed.
Additional Comments:
1. A copy of all necessary permits must be provided to the City.
2. Two Detail Sheets were referenced in the Sheet Index, but not included in the plan set.
3. An updated Plat, which addresses all easement issues, must be provided for review.
4. Provide a minimum 3 Cable Guard Rail where retaining walls are adjacent to the roadway. Cross
sections shall be provided to illustrate slopes in these areas.
5. Engineering calculations and fencing must be provided for all retaining walls greater than 4 feet in
height.
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
TKDA
• ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292 -4400
(651) 292 -0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
To: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Reference: The Preserve Development
Drainage Review
Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. (, 1 1 Proj. No.: 13604.009
Date: July 25, 2006 Routing:
The following review is based on these submittals:
1. Responses to drainage review comments submitted by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., dated
June 12, 2006.
2. Grading and Erosion Control Plan, submitted by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., dated April
10, 2006, and revised July 12, 2006.
3. Grading and Erosion Control Notes, submitted by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., dated
• April 10, 2006.
4. Storm Sewer Plan and Profile, submitted by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., dated July 6,
2006.
5. Geotechnical Report submitted by Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc., dated May 24, 2006.
The following comments are from TKDA's previous memos. New comments are in bold and identify items
that need to be addressed.
Drainage Review Comments:
1. The preliminary geotechnical report concludes that ground water is found between 0' to 8.4' and has
potential to fluctuate upward as much as 3.5' to 4.25'. It may be difficult to maintain groundwater
separation from the storm sewer. Alternative solutions must be provided to maintain groundwater
separation.
06/02/06 Provide an anticipated high ground water elevation. Low floor elevations shall be 4'
above the anticipated high ground water elevation.
NPDES standards require 3' of separation between the bottom of infiltration basin 4P
and seasonally saturated soils.
7/25/06 The lowest floor elevation shall be 4 feet above the highest anticipated water table
which is identified as mottled soils or the seasonally high water mark.
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
The Preserve Development Page 2 July 25, 2006
Drainage Review
• City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
2. Indicate the emergency overflow elevation and location of the existing wetlands and pond on the
plan.
06/02/06 It appears that the emergency overflow for both existing Pond 1P and the wetland
upstream of the 3' x 6' box culvert is located at the low point of Pheasant Run South.
Ensure that the low opening of existing homes and proposed lots adjacent to Pond 1P
and the existing wetland upstream of the 3' x 6' box culvert are 1' above the
emergency overflow elevation.
Update the emergency overflow elevation at the low point of Pheasant Run South on
the grading plan to the elevation of the top of curb or centerline of the road, whichever
is greater.
07/25/06 This item has been addressed.
3. Low floor elevations for lots located on Pheasant Run South are required to be a minimum of 2'
above the 100 -year elevation of the existing wetland.
06/02/06 The high water level indicated on the plan for the wetland upstream of the 3' x 6' box
culvert is 892.4. Based on this elevation, the low floor for Lot 7, Block 2 is required to
be at a minimum elevation of 894.4.
07/25/06 This item has been addressed.
4. Provide storm sewer calculations and a storm sewer schedule for review.
06/02/06 Item has been addressed.
07/25/06 Submit storm sewer calculations and a storm sewer drainage area map for
review.
5. Revised plans will need to be resubmitted to RCWD for approval, and documentation provided to the
City.
06/02/06 Item has been addressed.
07/25/06 Submit revised plans to Rice Creek Watershed District for approval, and provide
documentation to the City.
Additional Comments (07/25/06)
6. The City does not allow timber in the construction of baffled weirs. Provide an alternative
material, such as concrete or aluminum, for the proposed baffled weir detailed on sheet C.4.02.
7. The pond 4P outlet elevation in the HydroCAD model is 892.5. The baffled weir detail on sheet
C.4.02 shows the outlet elevation at 892.0. Update the pond 4P baffled weir outlet elevation in
the detail to be consistent with the model.
The Preserve Development
Drainage Review
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Page 3 July 25, 2006
8. All storm sewer is required to be a minimum of 15" in diameter.
9. Update the storm sewer profile on sheet C.7.02 so that the invert of STMH 10 is lower than
STMH 11.
10. All catch basin structures are required to be either Type 402 (catch basin leads) or Type 406 (2
or more pipes).
11. Include a detail of Catch Basin, Type 402 and Catch Basin, Type 406 in the plan.
•
•
Memo
Environmental
To: Paul Bengtson
From: Marty Asleson
Date: May 3, 2006
Re: April 29, 2006 Environmental Board Recommendations
The April 29, 2006 Environmental Board made the following recommendations:
• Since it is in a Level 1 habitat area, and an important Greenway area it was
• recommended to pursue a Conservation Development.
• It is important to look beyond the borders in design considerations to include
connections between Foxburough and the Saddle Club property.
• Developer should provide for increased public value as presented in the
preliminary review of May 25, 2005. Provision of contiguous, restored and
managed open space in the City Greenway would be most desirable.
• Keep proposed 28 feet roads.
• The proposed Conservation Easement should have acceptable
documentation covering the Easement, tied to Covenants and Restricts ions
of deed and homeowners association. The fees should be tied to the
management requirements outlined in the proposed stewardship plan.
• The plan should show roof -top water directed to grass areas of yards. Rain
gardens, although hard to see (Attachment 9), are designed into the
front of the eastern bank of houses. Recommend this design be
carried over into the western cul -de -sac bank of houses. Curb cuts
should collect water off the road surface and flow into the rain gardens.
These rain gardens should be low maintenance types, have a garden
appearance, and be similar to those gardens designed in the Maple Wood or
• Page 1
Burnsville retrofit garden models. Property owners were given a choice of
planting type. The plants for these ponds, although encouraged to be, do not
necessarily have to be native. Evaporative Control Systems could be an
option for these gardens. These ponds should be separately funded from
through storm water programming rather than restoration dollars.
Infiltration Ponds and storm ponds and swales should be planted to native
species in accordance with Critical Connections recommendations for
restoration and management.
All yard soils that will be planted with sod must have 4 inches of top soil
thoroughly tilled into the soil before sodding.
• A Storm Water Pollution Plan is different from an erosion control plan.
Developers typically submit an Erosion Control Plan. A Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is a" living- breathing" document required under the
Non -Point Discharge Elimination System requirements of the PCA.
Stormwater management can change from day to day and the document
should reflect anticipated and unanticipated events. An Erosion Control Plan
typically has generic copy -paste text and pictures. A SWPPP gets very site
specific. For instance, Attachments 6 and 7 talks about concrete truck
cleanout areas. A SWPPP will locate a spot on the Map. The SWPPP needs
to have a designated stormwater contact on the plan and a phone number
that the person can be reached at. The SWPPP will address unforeseen
events such as the need to dewater turbid site water. The SWPPP should
define beforehand how this will be done so that polluted water does not leave
the site. The Erosion Control Plan will clip -paste notes on rock entrances and
the SWPPP will address who will replace /top dress rock filled with sediment.
The SWPPP document must be in a designated place on site along with the
required weekly and post rainfall event inspection sheets. A mailbox on the
site marked SWPPP works best for the City. An acceptable SWPPP must
be submitted to the City Environmental and Engineering for approval
prior to ground breaking.
• No import or export of soils w /out city approval
• City lighting ordinance needs to be followed. Keep lighting and monument
lighting to minimum.
• Developer should submit an acceptable landscape plan.
• Developer should look at using modified walkouts as much as possible in
order to reduce fill placement.
• Developer should have a document produced for homeowners to
evidence Association and deed restrictions, and declaration of covenants.
• Page 2
• Remove shallow marsh restoration from the plan.
• Acceptable signage should be placed at the conservation easement
boundaries of each lot.
• Storm Water Pollution Plan should have a name and a number placed on
it for 7 days a week contact purposes.
• Add one boulevard tree per frontage if there is room to do so.
• Page 3
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and that part of the West Haff of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter all in Section 28, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except GEMINI
ESTATES and TRAPPERS CROSSING according to the recorded plats thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota; also
except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of said
quarter - quarter; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along the north line thereof 360 feet to
the point of beginning; thence continuing South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north line
388.48 feet; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West 345 feet; thence South 21 degrees 12 minutes East
166.94 feet; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 320 feet; thence North 0 degrees 22
minutes 58 seconds East 475 feet to the point of beginning; and also except that part of said quarter - quarter
described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said quarter - quarter; thence South 0 degrees 33
minutes 07 seconds West along the east line thereof 170.04 feet to Point "A "; thence North 89 degrees 29
minutes 30 seconds West 418.54 feet; thence North 22 degrees 30 minutes East 183.38 feet to the north line of
said quarter - quarter, thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north line 350 feet to the
point of beginning; and also except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Beginning at said
Point "A "; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 272.96 feet; thence South 22 degrees 30
minutes West 223.24 feet; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East parallel with the north line of
said quarter - quarter 356.42 feet, more or less, to the east line of said quarter - quarter, thence North 0 degrees
33 minutes 07 seconds East along said east line 207 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, except that
part thereof taken for road purposes.
AND
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka
County, Minnesota, lying northwest of the west right -of -way line of Holly Drive.
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
AREAS
GROSS SITE AREA=
LESS R/W=
NET SITE AREA=
TOTAL UPLAND AREA=
LOT SUMMARY
NUMBER OF LOTS=
AVERAGE LOT SIZE=
MINIMUM LOT SIZE=
MAXIMUM LOT SIZE=
DENSITY
PROPOSED DENSITY (GROSS AREA)
PROPOSED DENSITY (NET AREA)
DEVELOPMENT NOTES
52.56 acres
2.60 acres
49.96 acres
14.97 acres
31
0.30 acres
0.22 acres
0.61 acres
1.70 UNITS PER ACRE
1.61 UNITS PER ACRE
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED.
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER ALL OF OUTLOTS A, B, AND C.
RECEIVED
AUG 1 5 20
CITY OF UNO LAKE 6c
0 200
IN FEET
0
v
U
v o
c E
N z
0
E
0
m
CC
SHEET NUMBER
C.3.01
REV.
F
MFRA FILE / 152159
Aug 94.2006 -n - um+u�
6: �m.CTSV..269 *AE"uMExaN rREUIONARY sn•- n�wur.".,
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE - -,
SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
SEC. 2B, T. 31, R. 22
S89° 9'
49'18'
LJ 1
/
0 "E ;EDI
36 •0 MEAS)!
r- L) / / /-<��I f i � Nf\ ll) � 1 �� i ��,l r) 1� I (1
j j L_ I \ I /t /` ...t. UI,V I I i i /, / /Ill/
li 2I V Li
n\
'1 ' ' `/ '/ r
( i �' /' 7 / /NORTH NUNU E'OF 'THE ' I //
1011570Firai j i //--0�9 C� 1T. 31, 1R/21 ' / /'/ 'I
S/ ,� ;�. .' -- -- -.-......-/ /,/,//; S89 = 18 "W 21,x.,2
-1 T //'gyp^ 589'4 $1 388.48 (MEAS - -\ /� // 7 �> - ^, 589'491B W 350.00 (MEAS)
1 I / I / 00' %� S��'T9'SO'E (� ®)" _884-- 4 `;,r'�;sy <C/ S89'29'30 "E (DEED)
to I / / L J w c\,'
�N
(AS I i •: S89 °4919 "W
1 /
A 1-1 t\
/-1 LiLII I Il/I V
NORTHEAST
SW 1/4 OF
SEC.
PON
130'
1
3
88929'30.W (DEED)
145.58 S89•49'19'1Y 418.54 (MEAS)
` 589'48'19.W 272.96 (MEAS)
N89•9'30'W (DEED)
c,s
OUTLOT A ��Q
iti
N`�'.3 'I'G�e
....c? W:
8• °29'30 "E 356.42 (DEED)
S89°4 • "W 356/.40 (MEAS)
L -,Jd-
1
as-
--- N89!29'30AW-(pEED) \\\ \"•.
°49'18" . 320:00\ (MEAS)
CD
CNI
M yk
-- TREELINE - --
RcDEDItN�
PHEASANT RUN SOUTH
X16
r-
6 L
170,.
/
C" NORTH
SOUTH
/ 1514.80 OF
SE 1/,
OUT L�'}T D
/
/
/ X - GROSS AREA
/ Y = CONSERVATION OR WETLAND AREA
Z = BUILDABLE AREA
X - Y : Z
APP OOXIMATE r
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING WETLAND OMITS
PROPOSED LOT ONES
PROPOSED SETBACKS
PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE 0'zw
INSET A
0
RECEIVED
1 5 2006
AUG t
OF LINO LAKES
60
SCALE IN FEET
15
1_
10 II
-1_10
120
r15
DRAINAGILANLIETILIEUMEMEff
No XAIE
BEAK 10 FEET N 1110111, UNLESS 011ERW1SE
INDICATED, AND ADJOINING SIDE AND REAR LOT
UNES, AND 15 FEET N WI01H, UNLESS
OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING
RIGHT -OF -WAY U11E5. AS 01001 ON 1HE PLAT.
1210 - -
Lot Information Summa
,may; RSV, MAEVE :..
m
Lot Area
Building Setbacks
x
y
z
Conservation Area (si)
Block
Lot
Gross Area(sf)
or Wetland Area /sf)
Buildable Area(sf)
Front /ft)
Rearjft)
Side Yard(R)
1
1
21,671
7,330
14,541
25
10.0
10
2
1
10,714
3,397
7,317
25
69.6
10
2
2
11,677
2,377
9,300
30
56.0
10
2
3
12,329
2,072
10,257
30
53.5
10
2
4
14,237
2.595
11,642
30
482
10
2
5
14,826
1,867
12,959
30
51.4
10
2
6
11,312
0
11,312
20
18.5
10
2
7
9282
178
9,104
20
25.4
10
3
1
12296
0
12,296
25
61.6
5
D
4
1
10,637
0
10,637
30
11.3
10
4
2
13209
0
13,209
30
46.7
10
4
3
11,302
60
11242
30
36.5
10
4
4
10,098
553
9,545
25
18.0
10
4
5
8,099
439
7,660
25
15.5
10
4
6
8,803
436
8,367
25
23.5
10
4
7
21,652
6,843
14,809
25
282
10
5
1
11,530
0
11,53D
25
47.7
10
5
2
10,428
0
10,428
25
14.2
10
6
1
11241
0
11241
25
46.0
10
6
2
10,661
0
10,661
25
432
10
6
3
11.050
0
11,050
25
43.5
10
6
4
10.920
0
10,920
25
44.3
10
6
5
12,699
0
12,699
25
42.6
10
6
6
12.087
0
12,087
25
55.3
10N- 5S
7
1
13,420
6260
7,160
25
90.0
10
7
2
14,398
6.733
7,665
25
104.1
10
7
3
14,398
6,366
8,032
25
99.6
10
7
4
14,398
5.326
9,072
25
94.4
10
7
5
25,021
10,758
14263
25
91.0
10
7
6
15259
0
15.259
25
35.5
10
7
7
12,889
0
12,889
25
17.4
10
*NOTE:
BUILDABLE AREA (2) = GROSS AREA (X) - CONSERVATION OR WETLAND AREA (Y)
1n
Date 7/14/06 License # 21816
DJDI REV. PER R.W.D. C.
c
0
> c.
D_ '
SHEET NUMBER
0.3.02
REV.
F
14FRA FILE / 15269
\ PRpEC7S \iNTIS260 \ \ENWEEANG \PRE....Y Sxeq- 6)- vvi�l.e.q
8'
896
MIPPIni,Ralliiiiiiii .,,Fiajwir
gr
Ia°� 1
Iv di
i ?Mt 61 , 1
1 IlE`� �•■ IIC& �=• 11 MO
AVE"
LEGEND
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WETLANDS
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
094
892 \ j /
1,893.0
8,8920
31104 x10) 6
(,),
rd'%.,..#7
VtirOAP
NOV of
i*/*/
tofV
�4
IMO
1 MIA
aED
BRAG PAD
48 MIA%
TYPICAL BUILDING PAD
GRADING DETAIL
ND SCALE
4101E L TAE MDR SEPARATION BENEEN TIE GARAGE R. MD TIE BASBENT
FLOOR 8 A PRONMATELY IRS FEET, IMAMS ACTED 090804 E
2. Tie DETONATED HOLD DONI SHALL 8E COMM ACROSS THE ENTRE
ITEM OF TE LOT (SIDE EDT UlE TO SIDE LDT OE).
1 SOIL CORRECTOR FAR EACH THRONG PAD SHALL AS A MUM E
CORLEI1 THE FULL RD1N A ILE LD1(9E LOT ERE ID SIDE LDT
EN CORNY L015, SOL CONECIIW FOR EACH RUM PAD 91ALL E
COMPLETED ALONG BOTH SUES OF THE ADE ID AVOW HONE ID E 00151)
ALONG ENTIRE FWONMRE
GRACE IOW BLVAWW (*5998 CO WNW RAN)
OIiRAGNR A WNW 10 Ms BEVAWW
C 1854
owowx owe
AIFACWD MUMMA. MOERI
4. SOME BLIIDR11 PADS MATE (TEARER 1NM1 50 FEET N DEPMN (FROM FTOR
70 BACK) AS SHORN ON THE GRADING PLAN. CON1RACI0R TO CONTACT
DIRER PRIOR 70 COWQ)OIQR CF CGISIMJCR0N TO RENEW TES DFM.
S E A TAUT WALKOUT TINT IS 10 E CMASTR IC00 ON A LOOKOUT TWIT THE
BIRDER MAY WANT 10 COMER LDWQdNO TM NONE ELEVATION 0.5 FEET
THE FRONT HOD DOW FOR EACH INT 118E SHALL E AS FOLLOW
TO T.0
ZOO ME
ID 4.0'
OR 408E AS E10181 BY TIE SOILS ENGNffD1
REPIE0015 A 91A0LE11 MUTING G PAD S E (SS.5S)
AO IARM TIN
IDS MOON WD)
WMW/L4O110 SSAVAT a WOK
AS BLIMP Bx 483 OWNED
81.00(
PROPERTY
UNE
DRECTON OF
SURFACE
DRAINAGE
GARAGE FLOOR
ELEVATOR
LOW FLOOR
ELEVATION
LLIL
2.5
-893.0
0.06 AC
X8890
Kegs:
FOR WALK -OUTS (1,10), THE 'EXPOSED OPENING ELEVATION' 15 THE SAME AS
THE LOW FLOOR ELEVATION (LEE)
wHEN THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION i5 COMPLETED,
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH THE MITIGATION
AREAS BELOW THE NWL, BUT ABOVE THE EXISTING WATER
LEVEL AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. THE SEEDING SHALL COMPLY
87TH LIN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3876 WITH THE USE OF 9N/DOT MIXTURE
NO. 310 WITH WET FORE MIX AND APPUED AT A RATE OF 50 POUNDS
PER ACRE THE SEEDED AREA SHALL BE MULCHED. THE MULCH SHALL
COMPLY 18TH 1.19/00T SPECIFICATION 3882, TYPE 1. THE MULCH SHALL
BE APPLIED AND ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1.1N/DOT SPECIFICATION
NO. 2575.3. Ft. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 2 IONS PER
ACRE THE MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH A DISC. CLODBU5TER OR
OTHER APPROVED EQUIPMENT.
CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT FILTER INLET PROTECTION (SEE DETAIL) SHALL BE
PLACED ON ALL CATCH BASIN INLETS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL 'FINAL
ACCUMULATED 0141 SHALL BE UPSTREAM OPERLY DISPOSED OFF BASIN(S). 9FjJ 1 PRIOR TO
REMOVAL OF INLE.74 R01ECTON.
SUGGESTED
GARAGE
LOCATION
FINISHED
GROUND
ELEVATION
AT LOT
CORNER
PROPOSED RNI5HED
CONTOUR
LOT NUMBER
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXPOSED OPEJNIN0
ELEVATION
RECOMMENDED
HOUSE 118E
FINISHED GROUND
EI.EV. (ALSO GARAGE
FLOOR MEV.)
BUILDING SETBACK
LIMIT
992.5
RIGHT OF WAY
FINISHED CENIFRI8IE GRADE
CENTERLINE
100' CEN1ERUNE STATION
TYPICAL SINGLE FAMILY
LOT GRADING DETAIL
0041578901 2' HIGI BERG MR
MAMMUM SIDE SLOPE O 4:1
WOOL WM WAND W
O61MlE ROOM
DEMO WADE
RAMBLER (R)
SPLIT ENTRY
WALXOFF (5ET0)
LOOKOUT (10)
WALKOUT (WO)
1,892.0
ww891.0
1,896.0
8,8920
t'ar►' ='r. ���� �n1u11;�'�
�� • �I �I GFE -909.6 Nil €I�FFE =98.6 I�'��' ��'a' �0.. 1
�`�7111�II�3•7pIU��� 9111111l��IIU. �
THE SuesR804.. 1111 TOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A U71UTY CUALITY LEVEL D THIS OUMJTY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
ACCORDING TO
SUBSURFACE ND COSTING
DEUNES OF 0IASCE 30-02. TITLED 'STANDARD (ARDELNES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF STING
�' BATA' 1EI0 �ITRA:TOR AND /OR SUBC0*IJACTORS SHALL DEIERMINE LTE EXACT LOCATION O ALL XISlING
UTIUT1ES BEFORR COMMENCING WORK. BY CONTACTING 141E NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). 190 CONTRACTOR
680/08 SUBCON ACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT E OCCASIONED BY MS OR HER
FAILURE 70 EXA. Y LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL 91UTIE5 (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD)
ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE 915 HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE INVERT AND
ACTIVE NO ACTIVE DRAM TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAI FRW. Is, Don In-. ru....rro
LEL
LXIL
2 70 3 GRAVEL
EXISTING *rum)
HV.0 892LO PER RCM)
mIL
IF THE CONTRA
IF THE TIE UN
AL
1O4
thH
ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE
NO SCALE
NOTE
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL E INSTALLED
PRIOR TO THE START OF NIT SRE WORK
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED
FTAIOW80 EACH RN10ALL MAINTENANCE OF
THE Roo( ENTRANCES SHALL 810)30E A TOP
DRESSING O NEW GRAVEL, 0R REMOVAL AND
REPLACEMENT A T1E GRAVEL AS NEEDED, 70
KEEP DE ENTRANCE FREE FROM COLLEC1ED MID.
SILT FENCE DETAIL
NO SCARF
JUL 1 4 2006
60 120
Z
w
$ z
W Z 0 o
U
w
W<o
L °z
F=— JZz
0
0
CO
CO
C
0
9
40
0
0
CO
CO
m
Tj
CO
CO
O
Date: 4/10/06 License i 21816
A
8
03
8
s
a
SHEET NUMBER I REV.
r' A n-t I A
\ , v \ \
\ \ \ - \ \ \ \
\\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \
— \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\
i \ \ ( \ \\ \ \ \\ \
l_I_ \\ \ \ \ �"_\ \\ \ \ \ 1
\ \ \ lS \ \ \
\ \ I I \\ \ 6d? 1 1 1 \1 I I
I `,L._-__..- / / ii
\1 _J
\ \ \
1 -- \ —
\\
\ � —$9t7
V ' -- -
n
NOTES
1. AU. WATERMAN' SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 52. 1,8H 7.5 FOOT MINIMUM COVER.
2. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC ASTM 3034 SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
1 WATER SERVICES SHALL BE T' TYPE K COPPER
4. SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 4' PVC SDR 35.
i F 181E CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN 1HE 91E if OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION. SIZE WVFRT AM) IF THE TILE UNE 15 ACME NO ACTIVE DRAW RUE
SHAT BE 900101LLFD WHOM APPROVAL FROM 1HE PROW ENGINEER.
0
z
0- C4.
= -mm I
P El II II I
xa I I
882 - - - -- ____ ____ —' 1
I I 1 1 / I/
co
1 1 1 1 /
I 1 1
I 1 1
1 I 1
1 I
886-
c
\I\
/
1
3
MH
0
I
iL J
1
4 1
—
—_J
1 1
II
7
A
r
5
n
MW1
/ W '
O
03
0
GATE -V
GATE VALVE
8"x 6" TEE
6" GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
A
W
W
(3
X
W
(
(
-1/6 Bb
2
8 " -1/3
w
3
4
5
KILLDEER DRIVE
0
50
100
W= En
SCALE IN FEET
T
875
W
ID
sa
03
10
N-N
MN
ro
Z
00 10
m ▪ w5
AO
m
0 1 +00 2+00
z
m
al
m 10
m
TIE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHORN ON NESE PUNS 15 A U1UTY WAJTY LEVEL D. THIS WAUTY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDFUNES OF 01450E 38-01 TITLED
- STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTOR AND DEPICTION CF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTIUTY DATA: THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCCN1RACTORS SHALL DETERMINE 181E EXACT LOCATOR OF ALL
0iS1ING U1ILTDES BEFORE COMMENCING TURK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTTiCAT10N CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). TIE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCWTRACTCR AGREE TO BE FULLY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHOM MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY NI5 OR HER FAIRE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UT1JTE5 (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
.0 tl iW6 - u9� X7
3+00
4+00 5+00
6 +00
L B
-QTY-Q-74.14-10 IsAKE
75
0
cc
}
5I 0
0
2
0
0
CO
m
.c
N
N
2
CO
Z
J
0
0
G
SIEETIEla
C.6.01 BA
•
\5�
EXIST. 7
�3.44
•
Alr
12" PLU
4
1
MH 4
4
\ J
\ E
W
\ U
;%1 \ g
m n0 O iSrc
1�O 9„ Ka
QZ; M~j0
ZNI a¢W
0.000 -<
5
- - - - - - \ ▪ \ , \ \ \
\ \ N. \\
1 1 1 -� `\ \ \
j� ) i I ( \
O� I I 1 CO \ \` \`� \ \`\ �_ CO 1 1 II 1 i1 `\ �\\ ` \\` \\ �\ - �\
i 11 \ \ \ \ �\ \\ \ \\ \ --- _�'���
1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \` _ -
/J • \�• ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\\ \\\\ \ \\ I \ \\\ \\ \ \ I 1 1 / /
\ \ \ \ oZ ^) I
\ \ \\ \\ \\ `� \ \ \ \ 1 u ° -m 1 1 1 1 1 I
\ \ 6' 1 1 1 1 I zomm I I ( I I 1
1\ \ \� 1 1 1 1 1 11 NF'i " 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
NOTES:
J 1 \ \* _i j / I I - - -_ „rl., WIZ= I l l 1
1
1 I . 1 i .
Z
wx
" -1/32 BEND
1. AU. WATERMAN SHAD BE DUCTILE IRON CLASS 52 10111 73 FOOT WNW COVER.
2 AU. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC ASIL1 3034 SDR 35 UNL SS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
3. WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 1. TYPE K COPPER.
4. SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 4" PVC 5OR 35.
S F THE CONTRACTOR `NCONTERS ANY DRAIN 111E WITHIN THE SIZE. HE 01 SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER 1171I4 THE LOCATION. SIZE. INVERT AND E THE 1LE LATE IS ACDVE. NO ACTIVE DRAM 111E
SHALL BE BACKFO ED NITIOUT APPROVAL FROM 1HE PROECT ENGINEER.
i
i
i
1 4
PHEASANT RUN SOUTH
3
0 50 100
SCALE IN FEET
900
895
890
EX 3111 :t
698:28
900.65
885
880
i{ -16`• RCP - - -
PROPOSES ; 6R
NB :3
.1398:22
47_1
0...
52•- RCP
tr..co.sea.-83114htl. ....
3 I.6'- RCP -90X- CtltVERT
3011F. -..6'. PvC
_ .............._.._..__
ORE -DRILL £XISIING MH
875
2u.tF- -8..R3,G
SOR 55:9:04oz
901F: =:6' PvC.
59R :35:0:0.403- -
" -56:1;r: flf' :fi : CA iiia •
FOR : SATBTARY
FORCEIAAN -(fltL 0
WITH' SANDY
-1T- RCP
2"- HOPE- SANETAR•Y- FORCEMAIN
5D IF 12": CASING
F06 -WATERANUN
r t ip: iYA1ERulim
F1EL4ED- WI1H- SAND
PROVIDE: BENDS
AS NECESS4R
900
895
890
885
880
0,
m
r15875
1 +00 2 +00 3+00
THE SUBSURFACE U71UTY NFORNARGN SHOW ON 1HESE PUNS IS A 117l7TY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS OUALf1Y IEVEI. WAS DETEREOIED ACCORDING 70 TIE GAMINES OF WS(E 311-07. MUD
EXISTING
"STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR RE COLLECTION AND DERICIION OF DISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA' 7HE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF AU.
EESPON UTI FOR ANY AND CMMENCING WORK. BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR WNNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONIRACTOL AGREE 10 BE FULLY ALL OES WMCH WGHT BE OCCA5CNED BY HIS OR HER FAB IMF 711 FYAmr inr..r ......e........_ ......._ ... __
4+00
5+00
6 +00
7 +00 8+00
9 +00 10+00
1: 4
ZOO &::
GiiYui- LINOLgKES
W
3
>
o w
W Z 0
W 5
ri Q w
a_ Y W
0 ,n
W H }
In
0
0
D
i
0
O
0
0
m
am
t
U
0
8
0
0
5
s
SHEET LANDER r REV.
•a:aitii:
ADDITION
�r-
-dim
ME Writ.
K 1 1
at I;
WET
401001
/.
1
+wrap.
y
miThigh-
PACEPIR
Tr.=
CIE
_ _ateasrsr
/
i
\
- :_.Tr'. ♦ ///
ree'ut atw /
�71¢Lt[ri
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and that part of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter all in Section 28, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except GEMINI
ESTATES and TRAPPERS CROSSING according to the recorded plats thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota; also
except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said
quarter - quarter; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along the north line thereof 360 feet to
the point of beginning; thence continuing South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north line
388.48 feet; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West 345 feet; thence South 21 degrees 12 minutes East
166.94 feet; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 320 feet; thence North 0 degrees 22
minutes 58 seconds East 475 feet to the point of beginning; and also except that part of said quarter - quarter
described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said quarter - quarter; thence South 0 degrees 33
minutes 07 seconds West along the east line thereof 170.04 feet to Point •'A "; thence North 89 degrees 29
minutes 30 seconds West 418.54 feet; thence North 22 degrees 30 minutes East 183.38 feet to the north line of
said quarter - quarter; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north line 350 feet to the
point of beginning; and also except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Beginning at said
Point "A "; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 272.96 feet; thence South 22 degrees 30
minutes West 223.24 feet; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East parallel with the north line of
said quarter - quarter 356.42 feet, more or less, to the east line of said quarter- quarter; thence North 0 degrees
33 minutes 07 seconds East along said east line 207 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, except that
part thereof taken for road purposes.
AND
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka
County, Minnesota, lying northwest of the west right -of -way line of Holly Drive.
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
AREAS
GROSS SITE AREA=
LESS R /W=
NET SITE AREA=
TOTAL UPLAND AREA=
LOT SUMMARY
NUMBER OF LOTS=
AVERAGE LOT SIZE=
MINIMUM LOT SIZE=
MAXIMUM LOT SIZE=
DENSITY
PROPOSED DENSITY (GROSS AREA)
PROPOSED DENSITY (NET AREA)
52.56 acres
2.60 acres
49.96 acres
14.97 acres
31
0.30 acres
0.22 acres
0.61 acres
1.70 UNITS PER ACRE
1.61 UNITS PER ACRE
DEVELOPMENT NOTES
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED.
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER ALL OF OUTLOTS A, B, AND C.
RECEIVED
AUG 1 5 2
CITY OF LINO LAKE6c
0 200
E IN FEET
0
0
0
0
N
m
0
u
U
a
0
n
c
n z°
0
c m
C
N ..
p
CC
REV. KILLDEER DRIVE M49 BLOCKS 6 i 7
5
s
6
5
5
a
5
5
5
tl
5
R
5
6
tl
a
5
5
SHEET NUMBER
0.3.01
REV
F
MFRA FILE / 15269
Aug USER ]N \PROETS \Mriues \.ENURECmR
\PREUUwART ISSs9- 03- vaui.a.y
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE - -,
SW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
SEC. 28, T. 31, R. 22
S89° 9' s; 0 "E� SEED'
49'18' I36 .0 ASV
130'
-139r-
/ r - L) I /72/17;t7-7---- ij > 1 ,I ,'
L_I \ 1 (/.Z.IJI 1V l lil { i /'/ /1 /L I V LJ
I
/ \ 4_J I / ' / 1
/ NORTH UNE'OF THE 7 / /
j- ' - _- - '/ /' I. -- S89°
/ SW 1
/4 O- THE SE 1/4 / I
--- 0OINIT OFBEGINNIyC� , - -- OF- LB_T_31, R.-21, / , / /I
--
-1 -- / S89 °44'1 ,8%W 38 48 (MEA� / -, •;'.
§ a
/ > /
sm �\ \ �_ i / / /// /\ / /' /'/
/ / / � /
gay 1 _ _� /' /'
wig I r ,_- / /
18 "W 21
I/
/ /O
-
/ / /
/' / //
/ / /
L� I I
g
-13W-
L
co
co
A n rl I /-1 n I
/ -1LJU1 I I L/I V
a4,
An °� OO
C
� NN
S89°49 19
145.58
OUTLOT A
NORTHEAST
SW1 /40F
SEC.
Pan
S89 °49'18 W 350.00 (MEAS) -
S89°29'30'E (DEED)
-k0Y-\\
N89°29'30 -W (DEED)
S89•49'19'W 418.54 (MEAS)
S89 °49'19 -W 272.96 (MEAS)
N89'29'30'W (DEED)
CD
°29.30"E 356.42 (DEED)
"W 356/.40 (MEAS)
N'c
a.
CONSE' VA-11 ON
EASEMENT
6
CDNSERVATION.
EASEMENT .(TYP.)
• IRE-IRE
BOARDWSUI
PARK DEDICATION
.n.
TREELINE - --
'PARK DEDICATION
BOARDWALK:'
=Alfa
8Y" Tempnror
Turn Around
Lae
6Y f.
PHEASANT RUN SOUTH
.4 6
72
L .56
T
6 L 3J
-3B` ---I
,
4 II
11S
/
/
/ VI\\C'\)%
NORTP
SOUTH
1514.80 OF
SE 1/e
X = GROSS AREA
Y = CONSERVATION OR WETLAND AREA
Z = BUILDABLE AREA
X - Y = Z
LEGEND
INSET A
0
RECEIVED
AUG 1 5 2006
_ OF LINO LAKES
60
SCALE IN FEET
120
F15 - 1-10 r15
1- -1
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY BASEMENT
ND SCALE
BONG 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED, AND ADJOINING SIDE AND REAR LOT
UNES, AND 15 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS
OTHERWISE INDICATED. AND ADJOINING
RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT.
EXISTING CONTOUR _ 1210 -- -
EXISTING WETLAND LIMITS
PROPOSED LOT LINES
PROPOSED SETBACKS
PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
Lot Information Summary
*NOTE:
BUILDABLE AREA (Z) = GROSS AREA (X) - CONSERVATION OR WETLAND AREA (Y)
LLI
w
mow/�//
LL
0_
w
0
0
0
3
0
0
31
m
b
U
ym
0
0
•� o
o
61
C
a
6
3
a
6
5
SHEET NUMBER
C.3.02
REV.
F
INFRA FILE / 15289
s
is �v °xo.ce�s�iuns:ec�e y�eue "ecxiu rrt¢ww,wrtisaee- o3- vvui.e.9
Lot Area
Building Setbacks
x
y
z #
Conservation Area lsf)
Block
Lot
Gross Area(sf)
or Wetland Area (sf)
Buildable Arealsf)
Front(ft)
Rear(ft)
Side Yard(ft)
1
1
21,871
7,330
14,541
25
10.0
10
2
1
10,714
3,397
7,317
25
69.6
10
2
2
11,677
2,377
9,300
30
56.0
10
2
3
12,329
2,072
10,257
30
53.5
10
2
4
14,237
2,595
11.642
30
48.2
10
2
5
14,826
1,867
12,959
30
514
10
2
6
11,312
0
11,312
20
18.5
10
2
7
9,282
178
9,104
20
25.4
10
3
1
12.296
0
12,296
25
61.6
5
0
4
1
10,637
0
10,637
30
11.3
10
4
2
13,209
0
13,209
30
46.7
10
4
3
11,302
60
11,242
30
36.5
10
4
4
10,098
553
9,545
25
18.0
10
4
5
8,099
439
7,660
25
15.5
10
4
6
8,803
436
8,367
25
23.5
10
4
7
21,652
6.843
14.809
25
28.2
10
5
1
11,530
0
11,530
25
47.7
10
5
2
10,428
0
10,428
25
14.2
10
6
1
11,241
0
11,241
25
46.0
10
6
2
10,661
0
10,661
25
432
10
6
3
11,050
0
11,050
25
43.5
10
6
4
10,920
0
10,920
25
44.3
10
6
5
12,699
0
12,699
25
42.6
10
6
6
12,087
0
12,087
25
55.3
10N - 5S
7
1
13,420
6,260
7.160
25
90.0
10
7
2
14,398
6,733
7,665
25
104.1
10
7
3
14,398
6,366
8,032
25
99.6
10
7
4
14,398
5,326
9,072
25
94.4
10
7
5
25,021
10,758
14,263
25
91.0
10
7
6
15,259
0
15,259
25
35.5
10
7
7
12,889
0
12,889
25
17.4
10
*NOTE:
BUILDABLE AREA (Z) = GROSS AREA (X) - CONSERVATION OR WETLAND AREA (Y)
LLI
w
mow/�//
LL
0_
w
0
0
0
3
0
0
31
m
b
U
ym
0
0
•� o
o
61
C
a
6
3
a
6
5
SHEET NUMBER
C.3.02
REV.
F
INFRA FILE / 15289
s
is �v °xo.ce�s�iuns:ec�e y�eue "ecxiu rrt¢ww,wrtisaee- o3- vvui.e.9
896
LEGEND
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WETLANDS
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
KIS
960
894
77
x99
16
MUM PAD
LVMN6 PAD
NO70
FAME FLOOR MAIM (AS SINN M WAOIP RAO
COLON AWAEIO 94 MANN
0 wax
CO PATFO SlWS6sN 04FIRL
2
TYPICAL BUILDING PAD
GRADING DETAIL
HO SCALE
1. THE RESIT SEPARAIXN 8ET9B31 THE GARAGE ROCA AND 110 BASEMENT
FLOOR 0 APPROMMAIELY XX FEET. UNLESS NOTED 0110RW15E
2. T1E DESIGNATED NOD DOWN SINS BE COMPIEIED ACROSS THE ENTIRE
WDTH OF THE LOT (SIDE LOT LNE 10 SEE LOT LNE)
3. SOL CCRREC1)0N FOR EACH BALM PAD SHALL AS A 41048611 BE
COm1ElE5 THE FLL1 WIDTH OF TO LOT (SDE LOT TINE TO SIDE LOT UNE).
OH CORNR LOTS. SO. CCRTECRON FOR EACH BUILDING PAD SNAIL IS
COURSED ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE LOT, TO ALLOW HOME TO BE CONSTRUCTS)
ALONG ENTIRE MINTAGE
4. 5011E WRONG PADS MAY BE GREATER THAW 50 FEET N DEPTH (FROM FRONT
TO BACK) AS SHORT OH THE GRADS PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT
ENGINEER PRIOR 11) CONMENCE0NT OF CONSTRUCTION TO REVIEW TIS RDL.
5. IF A SPLIT WALKOUT UNIT IS 10 BE CONSTRUCTED ON A LOOKOUT IWYT. NE
WIDER MAY WANT TD CCN5005 LOWERNG THE HOME ELEVATION 0.5 FEET
• THE FRONT H1O0 DOWN FOR 0004 LENT TINE SHALL BE AS FOLOW0
WO 1.0
SEWO .V
LD L0'
• OR SLOPE AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGNIOR.
"• REPRESENTS A SMALLER BLBDRND PAD SIRE (55'.55')
AV (DORSET ((D)
TAT 'man Ow)
C6Rm*TW 10 1.¢AVA1E su WATTNL
AS 1EUW6➢ 4• fiL5 D mIE01
r NOTE,
2,5
9 -893.0
0.06 AC
BLOCK /
PROPERTY
LINE
DIRECTION OF
SURFACE
DRAINAGE
GARAGE FLOOR
ELEVATICN
LOW FLOOR
ELEVATION
SUGGESTED
GARAGE
LOCATION
FINISHED
GROUND
ELEVATION
AT LOT
CORNER
FIRM GRADE
PROPOSED 514)5HED
CONTOUR
LOT NUMBER
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXPOSED OPENING
ELEVARON
RECOMMENDED
HOUSE TSPE
FINISHED GROUND
ELEV. (ALSO GARAGE
FLOOR ELEV.)
BUILDING SETBACK
LIMIT
9925
CENTEITUNE —�•
RIGHT OF WAY
FINISHED CENTERUNE GRADE
100' CENTER0NE STATION
TYPICAL SINGLE FAMILY
LOT GRADING DETAIL
FOR WALK -OUTS (WO). THE 'EXPOSED OPENING ELEVATION' IS THE SAME AS
THE LOW FLOOR ELEVATION (LEE)
WHEN THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED,
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SIDED AND MULCH THE MITIGATION
AREAS BELOW THE NWL, BUT ABOVE THE EXISTING WATER
LEVEL AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. THE SEEDING SHALL COMPLY
047TH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3876 WITH THE USE OF MN/DOT MIXTURE
NO. 310 NTH WET FORE MIX AND APPUED AT A RATE OF 50 POUNDS
PER ACRE THE SEEDED AREA SHALL BE MULCHED. 1HE MULCH SHALL
COMPLY 16TH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3882, TYPE 1. THE MULCH SHALL
BE APPLIED AND ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 518/DOT SPECIFICATION
NO. 2575.3. 01. MULCH SHALL BE APPUED AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER
ACRE. THE MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH A DISC. CLODBUSTER OR
OTHER APPROVED EOUIPMENT.
CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT FILTER INLET PROTECTION (SEE DETAIL) SHALL BE
PLACED ON ALL CATCH BASIN INLETS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL -FINAL
STAWIU2ATION• HAS OCCURED UPSTREAM OF CATCH BASIN(S). ALL
ACCUMULATED 5EDIM • 1 SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF PRIOR TO
REMOVAL OF NILE - RESECTION.
WS)
O
CIINSTRUCT 2' HIGH BERM INS
MAXIMUM SIDE DOPE OF 4:I
(
0. -892.0
Bw=891.0
Tw -896.0
Bww•8920
THE ?Pt7850SRFA
ACCORDING TO
SUBSURFACE
UTIUDES BEFOR
AND /OR SUBCON
FAILURE TO EXA
sar---ww-wainiirralo—yt
Ott �� Iptc 3.71111,I�g e ' lilime-I U� �`
921 B .��IIlh�illl ��
I�L�E -Ja-x i ��
122• - _;- �'- /LI��11111!� �+�fi1is�, -�L*.�
INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTIUTY OUAUTY LEVEL D. THIS OUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED
DEUNES OF CIIA5CE 38-02, TITLED 'STANDARD OIDEUNES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXI51180
TY SETA• THE �RRACTOR AND /OR SUBCCLI(ACTORS SHALL DEIEFMIMEjE EXACT LOCATION OF A1L 10STING
COMMENONG WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR
ACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER
Y LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL 01)411IE5 (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
THE CONTRAC •- ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR 91E SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER LOCATION, 512(. WADS AND
IF THE TILE UNE 5 ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLEI WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENANEERA
EXISTING O TLAND
H111. =892/0 PER ROAD
x8878
2• TO 3' ARAM
ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE
NO SCALE
NOTE:
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED
PFDOR TO THE START CF ANY SRE WORK
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED
FOLORNG EACH RAINFALL MAIMTENANCE OF ENTRANCES SHALL INCUJDE A TOP
THE DRESSING OF NEW GRAV<1. OR REMOVAL AND
REPLACENENT OF THE GRAVEL AS NOTED, TO
KEEP THE ENTRANCE FREE FROM COlECTED MUD.
TR2
AO' 55.
POSTS
9AOM18. WM atom ON
104 UNE MA1WN
RAMBLER (R)
5PUT ENTRY
WALKOUT (5(810)
LOOKOUT (L0)
WALKOUT (WO)
DI ECIIOTI OF
DRAINAGE
ESNs NKR
FLIER FABRIC
(MRAF1 -0IWRO MICE
OR APRONS EQUAL)
MI. 30• - MAX 36'
ARSE TRACE
AO(RLL 6• LI 6• 110901
SILT FENCE DETAIL
NO SCALE
JUL 1 4 2006
CIS•'OF LINO LAKES
60 120
SC AI F IN FITT
O
To S
41
(rte
a
8
51
II
15
0
SHEET NUMBER REV.
C.4.01 A
\ \ \\ `\`� � \ '\ \ \ \ \ \
\ \\ \ \ \\ \,,,),".,`,:\ \ \ \ \ \\\.\\\ \
\' \ \ \ \ \
\\ \ \� \ — `\ \ \ \ \\ ` �\ \ \�\ \\ \ \\
\ \� \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` 0arnm
\ \ \ \\ \ 1 \ \ �/ 882------ _- - - - - -/
\ \ \� - -____ I \ � / /' _
I
\\\�'- A_ —886
\ L —890
\
1 892 -
893—
- _ - -__ III //
1 I I / /
I I 1
I I 11 I
1 1 1 1
I ) ( 1
L_
c
1 1
i7
z
01
/
A
A
LIJ
A
A
L
r
3
4
5
.<",1 I I i
19MH J O
13 '
11111111141 -111i
GATT =VAL
II II
1L J
MW1
—J
• ' ,u I
II!i.
NOTES
1. AU. WATERMAN SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON. CUSS 52, MTIH 7.5 FOOT MINIMUM COVER.
2. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC ASTM 3034 STIR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
3. WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 1' TYPE K COPPER.
4. SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 4' PVC STIR 35.
i F THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER MTH THE LOCATION. SIZE INVERT AND IF THE TILE UN0 I5 ACTIVE NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE
SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER
F
w
2
(
— 1
" GATE VALVE
8"x 6" TEE
6" GATE VALVE
HYDRANT
A
LA CI
U Z
Etl 0
a
LHJ O
3
4
5
KILLDEER DRIVE
1 F a
0
50
SCALE IN FEET
100
900
895
890
885
880
EX
-MH
900 -9
MM -$0
60.55
MH -11-
f199.01-
PROPOSED - -ORADE
WIZ .
Pa7.90 -
34H :133
b94T
MK 14
900-70-
R
ED:GR0O
PROFILE -
0
900
.........
..
EX1S1NG 8- -WATERMAIN
..... (1JERIFRIF Y - LOCATWN3
tE)ASIM ..R..SANITARX: $JVA'
-- - ----- {VERIFY LOCATION)
L r: 8"
PVC 5DR'35
0 0-40%
260 1F-- -8 "-PVC
FOR -35- 0-0.40%
941f ; :8": PVC -
SDR 35:9 :Q -40%
104 LF -8"
.....P.VC SDR:35
0.0.40%
875
a.
TOP OF 11W- TER -890.6
0
0 An
DIRECTIONAL .BORE
180 tF. --. -8' • HOPE
0....
03
a-
11
. 2"- FM
N
8
M)
10
Hn
.to
JO
O
m-
z
05
xW
m
JUL: :14 21 6:
0 1 +00 2 +00
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY NFORMATION SHOWN CN THESE PLANS IS A UTTUTY OUAUTY LEVEL D. THIS DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CUASCE 38-02. TITIED
'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL
EASING UT1UIIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORN, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND /0R SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE ID 80 FULLY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, MACH MIGHT BE OCCASONED BY HIS OR HER FMWRE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UIRITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD).
vsn m
3+00 4+00 5+00 6 +00
895
890
885
880
75
X
°
0
a
8
0
CO
U
m
Q
10
C13
z
m
z
0
a
N m
9
N
9*
REVISED PER CITY RFIAARRS
9HELT NUMBER
C.6.01
RE7 .
X
\5�
EXIST.
5'
0.
12" PLU
A
1
MH 4
4\
\ A
F1
h K �pp
Nip
a
40
oo ~
El
amB
z
0-
O
CC
W
w
\ U
5
1 ( \ \\ \\ ■
L■
) i 1/ i I \ "
▪ ■
I \ \
-
■
\ \,I \ \ \ \ ▪ \. ▪ \— - -- \ //
. \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ - _ - - -- —\I \) II / ///
\ \ \ \ ` \ \\ 1 1 1 / /
\ \\ \ \ \ \�\ \ \ \ \\ I 1 1 1 1
\ \ \ - -____ 1 1 1 1 I
e
I� \ \ \ \I (� \ \ \ \ 1 �aOiri I 1 I I I
\ \\ �6+\\ N 1 1 1 I zoenm I 1 I
I \ l 1 1 1 x� I I I I
I� 1 \ \. \N.--- .) / 1 1 1 _ La ...--•= I C I I 1
NOTES __ n n n I I I
1. ALL WATERIAIN SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON, CUSS 5Z NTH 7.5 FOOT MINIMUM COVER.
2 ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC ASTM 3034 SDR 35 UNLESS ()INDORSE INDICATED.
3. WATER SERVICES SHALL BE Y TYPE K COPPER.
4. SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 4' PVC SDR 35.
S F THE CONTRACTOR %COUNTERS ANY DRAIN DIE Wi1NN THE SITE HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE 111E UNE IS ACTIVE NO ACTIVE DRAIN TILE
SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER.
CO
0
C) -1/32 BEND
w"
0
LJ
Z
Wig
O m rn
=N m
R
to
W O 2
O
W
3
z
PHEASANT RUN SOUTH
0 50 100
SCALE IN FEET
900
895
890
885
880
EX: 14H 'T
898 :29
M1+ 2
900.65
PROPOSED GRADE
NH :3
898:22........
m)-
. 0 .
O
YAH4
0 --
12` RCP
01PAKA -1E1HA IN
WA
3' /C- 6'- REP -1105. CUt/ERT
214 - tF -- 6- -R\/G
SDR 5 :0 :(190%.
PVC . .
51)R :35: 9: 0.803...1. .
SD -Lf- OF :Ni : tASUI4 •
FOR :SANITARY'
FORCZM IN - (FlL(J:D
- WITH+ SAND)
'15 "-RCP
2 "- HOPE. SANITARY- FOROEMAIN
ORE-0RIf -EXISTING-MH
875
50
L'F 12". CASING
FOR-WATERMAIN
...............
900
895
890
885
8' OIP WA tJ1MAIN
- - - - (FILLED- win- SAND
PROVIDE RODS
AS NECESSARY
01 ......
m
n
P.
03
n
R
.o
N
vs
03
m
1 +00 2 +00 3+00
THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS I5 A U1U1Y OUAUTY LEVEL D. THIS CNAUTY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUDEUNES OF UTASCE 38-OZ TITLED
'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTOR AND DEPICTION OF EASING SUBSURFACE UTUTY DATA THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE ESACT LOCATION OF ALL
ExISTING UTLITES BEFORE CCMMENCIIG WORK, BY CONTACTING 1HE NOIHICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MDWIESOTA). TIE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, 411401 MIGHT BE OCCAOCNED BY M5 OR NCR FAILURE TO E%AC1OY 1 DN.0(0 AuD eocus.c ..." 111,1 ..1111.- .......--- -....-
4+00 5+00
6 +00
7 +00 8 +00
9 +00 10+00
880
875
.........
L 1 :4
2006
i � e Y. 09= LINOS LAKES
✓
0
0
0
m
U
m
0)
2
License # 21816
O
SHEET NUMBER ( REV.
• The Preserve
•
•
Conservation Development
Restoration and Management Plan for Conservation Areas
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Prepared By: Prepared For:
Critical Connections
Ecological Services, Inc
Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc.
17085 Olinda Trail
Marine on St. Croix, MN 55047
Revised
August 10, 2006
Integra Homes
12721 Overlook Road
Dayton, Minnesota 55307
• Table of Contents
•
I. Introduction 1
II. Landscape Context and Site History. 4
Geology, Soils, and Groundwater 4
Presettlement Vegetation (Circa 1850) 6
III. Ecological Survey of the Preserve Conservation Areas 7
Major Vegetation Types 7
Rare Plant Populations 11
IV. Restoration and Management Needs and Recommendations 12
Restoration and Management Goals and Objectives . 12
Prescribed Native Plant Communities 12
V. Restoration and Management Tasks and Timeline 20
Phase 1 - Site Recovery and Restoration: Years 1 -5 (Outlot B and C) 20
Phase 2 - Maintenance and Management: Years 5 -10+ (Outlot B and C) 24
Phase 3 — Additional Restoration and Management Needs (Outlot D) 25
VI. Socio - Cultural Considerations and Recommendations 27
VII. Recommendations for Monitoring and Adaptive Management 29
VIII. References . 31
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan i
•
•
List of Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
The Preserve Conservation Development Site Location and Landscape Context
Typical Pattern of the Isanti - Soderville -Rifle Soil Association
Presettlement Vegetation of The Preserve Conservation Development
The Preserve Site Plan Depicting Conservation Area Outlots
Existing Conditions and Vegetation Quality (August 2005)
Conservation Area Restoration and Management Plan (August 2006)
Proposed Trail Alignment within The Preserve Conservation Development
List of Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Phase 1 Restoration and Management Needs and Tasks (Years 1 — 5)
Phase 2 Restoration and Management Needs and Tasks (Years 6 - 10 +)
Appendices
Appendix A Restoration and Management Tasks and Timeline
Appendix B The Preserve Soil Types - Official Soil Series Descriptions
Appendix C Prescribed Natural Community Species Lists
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan ii
I. Introduction
In April 2005, Integra Homes, Inc. retained Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc.
(CCES) to conduct a natural resources inventory and assessment, to identify priority
conservation areas, and to develop a natural resources restoration and management plan for
potential conservation areas associated with The Preserve Conservation Development within the
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota. The 52.5 -acre residential conservation development is located
south of Birch Street and west of Holly Drive W in the southeastern corner of Lino Lakes
(Figure 1). One lot has been set aside for a future City well facility (Outlot A). Of the 52.5
acres, approximately 41.8 acres have been set aside in three conservation outlots (Outlots B, C,
and D) and within conservation easements in rear residential lots. Outlots B and C comprise
11.9 acres, and will be placed within permanent conservation easements, and will be restored and
managed in years one through three with resources dedicated by the land developer. Additional
restoration and management resources for the remaining conservation areas (Outlot D, 29.9
acres) will need to be obtained by the City and/or Home Owner's Association to implement
restoration and management of Outlot D in the future. Furthermore, a public pedestrian trail and
boardwalks have been planned within portions of the conservation areas and along the residential
streetscape, and will serve to connect existing and proposed regional trail systems within the City
of Lino Lakes and the greater Rice Creek Chain of Lakes regional open space.
The residential development consists of thirty (30) single family residential lots and narrowed
residential streets that have been designed to cluster housing, reduce overall impervious surfaces,
minimize stormwater runoff and maintain site hydrology, and restore and preserve existing
natural areas within the development in the form of permanently protected and managed outlots.
Within the residential development, stormwater will be treated and managed through a
combination of residential rainwater gardens, neighborhood infiltration basins, and conventional
storm sewer and ponding. Conservation areas contained within identified conservation
easements and outlots will be restored and managed as natural communities consistent with the
pre - settlement vegetation of the site, such as oak woodlands and savannas, aspen woodlands, wet
meadows, emergent marshes, mesic prairies, and wet prairies.
The on -site natural resources inventory and ecological assessment was conducted by CCES
ecologists from April through September 2005, and served as baseline natural resources
information from which the site plan was developed. The site inventory and ecological
assessment was designed to document the extent and types of existing vegetation and native
plant communities, to assess the relative ecological quality of remaining natural vegetation and
semi - natural areas, to serve as baseline information from which the conservation development
site plan would be planned and designed, and to identify opportunities and prioritize resource
needs for immediate and long -term restoration and management within the conservation areas.
Landscape scale information (e.g., surficial geology, soils, presettlement vegetation) and past
land use history were researched from historic documents and other resources, and are cited
within the text where appropriate. Background information regarding the site's landscape
context and context within the City's planned open space and greenway system were considered
and incorporated into the natural resources stewardship plan as well.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 1
•
•
The following natural resources stewardship plan describes natural resource restoration and
management recommendations for the various natural community remnants and semi - natural
areas documented within The Preserve's permanent conservation areas. The intent of the plan is
to assist Integra Homes, the City of Lino Lakes, and the future Homeowners Association to
effectively preserve, restore, and manage the site's natural resources in the short term (one to
five years), and to improve the ecological quality and function of the conservation areas over the
long term (years 5 to 10 and beyond) through an adaptive management approach. Successful
restoration and management will likely require long -term collaborative efforts of various
organizations and individuals, community groups, municipalities, and government agencies,
including the residents of The Preserve, the City of Lino Lakes, the Rice Creek Watershed
District, the Saint Paul District of the US Army Corps of Engineers, and the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources.
As the conservation areas are established, restored, managed, and enjoyed by the residents of
The Preserve and visitors to the site, it is important that local residents and other project
stakeholders be kept well informed and involved in planning and implementation of management
actions, as well as the supporting science, policies, and agreements that support these
management decisions. Such an approach has been demonstrated within similar private
conservation developments and public preserves and open spaces to be successful in helping to
foster a core group of local citizens that are well informed, more involved, and take a proprietary
interest in the restoration and stewardship of the natural resources and cultural amenities within
permanent conservation areas.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 2
P.M
•
•
•
0.5
0
0.5 1 Miles (i)
The Preserve Conservation Development Site Location and Landscape Context
Legend:
Proposed Greenway Corridor
Section Boundaries
Exisiting Trails
ProposedlConcept Trails
Figure 1
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 3
• II. Landscape Context and Site History
•
The Preserve is a 52.5 -acre residential conservation development located in southeastern Lino
Lakes. The legal description for the site is T31N R22W S1/2 of Section 28 and N1/2 of Section
33. The conservation development is located along a regionally significant greenway and open
space corridor that has been identified by the City of Lino Lakes and the Minnesota DNR
(Figure 1).
Geology, Soils, and Groundwater
The Preserve Conservation Development is located within the Anoka Sand Plain ecological
subsection of Minnesota. The Anoka Sand Plain is a large glacial outwash plain that includes
most of Anoka, Isanti, and Sherburne Counties and portions of Washington, Chisago, Ramsey,
and Hennepin Counties in central Minnesota. This extensive sand plain was formed at the end of
the last major ice age, circa 10,000 — 12,000 years ago, as receding of glacial ice lobes to the
north formed expansive sand and gravel outwash plains along glacial river ways within central
Minnesota.
The soils of The Preserve site and surrounding landscape are comprised of predominantly sandy
and sandy loam soil types typical of the Anoka Sand Plain. Within The Preserve's conservation
areas, the upland soils types are: Zimmerman fine sand, Lino loamy fine sand, Soderville fine
sand, and Isanti fine sandy loams. Wetland and transitional areas are comprised of Isanti fine
sandy loams, and Rifle muck (an organic peat soil type).
Zimmerman fine sands consist of very deep, excessively drained soils that formed in sandy
glacial outwash or lake sediments on glacial outwash plains, stream terraces, deltas, lake
terraces, dunes, beach deposits and valley trains. These soils have rapid permeability. Their
slopes range from 0 to 60 percent. Zimmerman soils are excessively drained, surface runoff is
negligible to low and soil permeability is rapid. Most of the acreage in the southern portions of
the Anoka Sand Plain is used to grow alfalfa, corn, and soybeans. Most acreage in northern areas
remain in forest. Native vegetation was primarily mixed oak forest or jack pine and red pine.
Lino loamy fine sands are somewhat poorly drained. Surface runoff is very low. Permeability is
rapid. The water table is at 1.5 to 3.0 feet during November to June in most years. These soils
are commonly cropped to soybeans and corn. Undeveloped areas are in pasture, forested
pasture, or upland forest. Pre - settlement native vegetation was deciduous forest with red and bur
oak, aspen, and some water tolerant grasses being the dominant plants.
Soderville soils are moderately well drained, and surface runoff is negligible. Permeability of
the Soderville soil type is rapid in the upper soil horizons, and moderately rapid in the lower soil
profile. Soderville soils have a perched seasonal high water table at a depth of 2.0 to 3.5 feet
(below the soil surface) at some time from April through June in most years. Common native
vegetation of Soderville soils is White Pine (Pinus strobus), Red Pine (Pinus resinosa), and Red
Oak (Quercus rubra), and Northern Pin Oak (Quercus ellzpsoidalis), as well as upland prairie
grasses and forbs in non - forested areas.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 4
•
•
Isanti soils are poorly to very poorly drained, with a water table at plus 1 foot to 0.5 feet below
the soil surface for the very poorly drained, depressional phase, and 0.5 to 1.5 feet below the soil
surface for poorly drained phase at some time October through June in most years. Native
vegetation of Isanti soils is typically comprised of grasses (Poaceae), sedges (Cyperaceae),
willow (Salix spp.), Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides), and other species adapted to
persistent wet conditions (i.e. hydrophytic plant species).
Rifle mucks are very deep, very poorly drained soils formed in organic deposits more than 51
inches thick in bogs and depressional areas within ground moraines, end moraines, outwash
plains, and lake plains. Rifle muck soils have moderately rapid permeability. Slopes range from
0 to 2 percent. Rifle mucks are very poorly drained, with the seasonal high water table ranging
from 1 foot above the surface to 1 foot below the surface from November to June. Surface runoff
and internal drainage is very slow; permeability is moderately rapid. Rifle muck soils are
primarily in woodland or wet meadow. A few areas are used for pasture. Principal vegetation is
tamarack, black spruce, paper birch, balsam fir, black ash, and northern white - cedar. Native
ground cover is sphagnum moss, leather leaf, blueberry, and Labrador tea, with native and
invasive grasses and sedges common in partially drained Rifle Muck wetland systems.
Figure 2 depicts a schematic oblique view of a typical Isanti — Soderville soil complex in Anoka
County, Minnesota. The complete official soils series descriptions (OSD's) for the soil types of
The Preserve site are provided in Appendix B of this report (USDA NRCS, 2005). Furthermore,
additional information on soils can be obtained from the United States Department of
Agriculture's Soil Survey of Anoka County, Minnesota (USDA 1977).
AN( A COUNTY. MINNfs"'OTA
Figure 2. Typical Pattern of the Isanti-Soderville-Rifle Soil Association
Soil Survey of Anoka County MN (USDA, 1917)
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 5
•
•
Presettlement Vegetation (Circa 1850)
According to vegetation data compiled from the Original Land Survey Notes of Minnesota (circa
1850), and mapped by F.J. Marschner (1975), the natural vegetation of The Preserve
Conservation Development and surrounding landscape at the time of European settlement was
comprised predominantly of oak openings and barrens (oak savanna/woodland) in the uplands,
and wet prairie within lower lying wetland areas extending north and south along the margins of
the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes. The pre - settlement vegetation of Anoka County was continually
affected by occasional to frequent wildfires during periods of drought. Less commonly, areas of
mesic hardwood forest ( "Big Woods ") were also in the vicinity of The Preserve site, typically
occurring in those portions of the landscape that wildfires could not penetrate (such as isolated
islands and large isolated topographic depressions; Figure 3).
Oak Barrens
Wet Prairie
Oak Barrens
The Preserve
Oak Barrens
Wet Prairie
Wet \
Prairie
ANOKA COUNTY
RAMSEY COUNTY
0.5 0 0.5 1 Miles
Wet Prairie
Figure 3. Presettlement Vegetation of the The Preserve Site (Circa 1850)
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 6
• III. Ecological Surveys of The Preserve's Conservation Areas
From April through September 2005, CCES ecologists conducted spring and summer surveys of
The Preserve Conservation Development site. Surveys were conducted throughout the entire
52.5 -acre conservation development site. Existing natural community remnants, semi - natural
areas, and non - native dominated landscape types were assessed for their extent and relative
quality, and restoration opportunities and needs were defined, on a conceptual basis, for these
areas. The conservation development site plan was developed and refined based on the results of
the 2005 ecological surveys. Once the conservation areas and easements were defined, CCES
developed a restoration and management plan for The Preserve's permanent conservation areas
and prescribed suitable natural communities to be restored to these areas (see Figures 4, 5 & 6).
CCES ecologists identified, mapped, and surveyed several moderate to low to moderate quality
natural community remnants and semi - natural vegetation types throughout The Preserve
Conservation Development site. The vegetation and ecological habitats of the site at the time of
the 2005 surveys were comprised of oak forests and oak woodland remnants, aspen woodlands,
wet prairies, degraded wet meadows, degraded emergent marshes / cattail marshes, degraded
shrub swamps, and non - native upland old fields and pastures. The location and extent of these
natural community remnants and semi - natural areas are depicted in Figure 5, and brief
descriptions of these areas are provided in the text below.
Major Vegetation Types
• Upland Communities and Cover Types
•
Upland areas in the conservation areas are comprised of mesic oak/aspen forest and old field.
These forested areas are dominated by oak species (Northern Pin Oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis),
White Oak (Quercus alba), Bur Oak (Quercus macrocarpa)) and quaking aspen (Populus
tremuloides). The oak/aspen forest is of moderate quality, with an intact canopy. Management
efforts within proposed oak forest/woodland conservation areas will focus on buckthorn
management and the transplanting of salvaged herbaceous material from on -site. Native
woodland herbaceous species can also be salvaged from non - conservations areas and
transplanted in the conservation areas. The other predominant upland vegetation type is old
field, most of which will be developed. Remaining old fields located within the conservations
areas will be restored to dry prairie /savannas
Wetland Communities and Cover Types
Wet Prairie Remnants
Two wet prairie remnants were documented in the northern portion of the property, with two rare
specie populations documented by CCES ecologists. These wet prairie are somewhat degraded
due to habitat fragmentation, fire suppression, partial site drainage, and invasive species.
Management efforts should focus on the reintroduction of fire, monitoring of endangered species
populations and invasive species control where necessary. Residential lots were located to avoid
these unique and uncommon habitats. Wet prairies will be restored and managed through
invasive species management, reduction of native and exotic woody species cover and
abundance, and re- introduction of prescribed fire.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 7
•
•
Z00 0 200
SCALE IN FEET
Engineering • Planning • ,Sbrveyng
,. Ammo
Suite MO
JM3moud9 Minnesota 55447
Owe 78.076 -60/0
ir�drrRoas far 2i43/476 -8551
THE PRESERVE
UNO LAKES, MN
INTEGRA HOMES
PREUMINARY PLAT
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan
8
Legend:
OF Oak Forest
OW Oak Woodland
AW Aspen Woodland
WP Wet Prairie Remnant
OLFD Old Field
CM Cattail Marsh
DWM Degraded Wet Meadow
DSS Degraded Shrub Swamp
Existing Ditch
• Endangered Orchids
Site Boundary
250 0 250
c)i.)
500 Feet
Critical Connections
Ecological Services, Inc.
The Preserve Conservation Development
Existing Conditions and Vegetation Quality (2005)
T31N R22W Sections 28 and 33
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Figure 5
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 9
• Degraded Wet Meadow
•
Areas defined as degraded wet meadow are dominated by greater than 90% cover of reed canary
grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and have poor native floristic diversity. Reed canary grass is an
invasive wetland grass, and is the primary problematic invasive species within all of the wetlands
(and adjacent upland transitions) of the site. Management efforts will require reducing overall
cover by reed canary grass, re- seeding and establishment of appropriate native species
assemblages, and reintroduction of fire. Areas currently classified as degraded wet meadow will
be restored a more species rich and higher quality wet meadow and/or shallow marsh.
Degraded Shrub Swamps
The shrub swamp communities are dominated by greater than 90% cover of reed canary grass
(Phalaris arundinacea) along with having significant cover by pussy willow (Salix discolor) and
red -osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera). The restoration and management approach for the
degraded shrub swamps will be similar for that of the site's wet meadows: reduction of overall
cover and abundance of reed canary grass, establishment of native herbaceous species,
reintroduction of fire, and thinning of native shrub species.
Degraded Emergent (Cattail) Marsh
The cattail marshes located in the southern and northeastern portions are of the property are
degraded, dominated by greater than 90% cover of invasive cattail (Typha angustifolia and T x
glauca). Management efforts will focus on reducing the cover of cattail, removing cattail
biomass, restoring native vegetation, and reintroduction of fire (during dry years). This area will
be re- vegetated with mixed emergent marsh species.
Cattails are often a problematic wetland species within degraded wetlands of central Minnesota,
and should be aggressively managed as to favor conditions favorable to the establishment of
more diverse native wetland plant communities. Narrow- Leaved Cattail (Typha angustifolia) is
a non - native, invasive plant that hybridizes with the native Broad - Leaved Cattail (T latifolia) to
produce the invasive Typha x glauca.
Aspen Woodlands and Transitions
Most of the wetlands on the site are encompassed by relatively dense, immature stands of
Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides) along the wetland/upland transitional zones. As is the
case with The Preserve site, aspen stands frequently establish along wetland fringes on the
Anoka Sand Plain in the absence of fire, and form dense, shaded, species -poor stands. In the
absence of past management, these aspen stands of The Preserve site are further degraded by
Reed Canary Grass ( Phalaris arundinacea), Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), Glossy
Buckthorn ( Rhamnus frangula), and other noxious or aggressive weed species.
The aspen woodland fringes of The Preserve site are comprised (most often) of single- species
canopies of 2 to 12 inch diameter aspen, with Reed Canary Grass, Sensitive Fern (Onoclea
sensibilis), and Pennsylvania Sedge (Carex pensylvanica) common to the ground layer. CCES
recommends that at least some of these Aspen dominated wetland fringes be selectively thinned
or completely cleared of Quaking Aspen, as to promote the re- establishment and management of
more diverse herbaceous communities, such as mesic /wet prairie, and wet meadow natural
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 10
•
•
communities. However, CCES recognizes that some of the aspen stands should remain intact, as
these young woodland stands do provide limited ecological functions and aesthetic values, and
serve as useful visual screens of adjacent residential structures and industrial land uses.
Rare Plant Populations
One population of tubercled rein - orchid (Platanthera flava — Minnesota Endangered) was
located within a wet prairie remnant located in the northern portion of the property. Seventy -five
individuals were detected within the wet prairie remnant, and their locations were recorded with
a sub -meter accuracy GPS unit (see Figure 5). This population is protected under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 84.0895 by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR), and
the conservation development plan avoids impacts to this population and incorporates
management strategies to enhance the wet prairie habitat that contains these rare orchids.
Additionally, one population of Clinton's bulrush (Scirpus clintonii — Minnesota Special
Concern) was growing in association with the tubercled rein - orchid. Although species
designated as Special Concern are considered rare to the state, such species are not legally
protected by Minnesota Statutes 84.0895.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 11
IV. Restoration and Management Needs and Recommendations
Restoration and Management Goals and Objectives
• Restore, manage, and improve pre- existing moderate and low quality natural
communities and natural resources within the conservation areas;
• Re- establish and/or restore native vegetation cover within highly disturbed and non-
native landscape areas within the conservation areas that is ecologically appropriate and
suited to the environmental conditions of the site and is suitable to proposed human uses
and desired site aesthetics;
• Re- establish prescribed fire as a management tool onsite;
• Protect and manage existing endangered plant populations;
• Establish conservation signage (and other infrastructure) that help facilitate sustainable
natural resource management and other programmed activities.
• Provide recreational and educational opportunities for the residents of The Preserve and
that are compatible with sustaining, restoring, and improving the natural vegetation and
ecological functions of the conservation areas;
• Implement surface water and public infrastructure planning and development within the
site and adjacent landscape that compliments (and does not further degrade) the natural
resources of the site (Use of alternative stormwater management techniques); and
• Create a required wetland mitigation basin in northeast corner of site, establishing
appropriate native species cover and hydrology (wet meadow, wet prairie, emergent
marsh).
Prescribed Native Plant Communities
Much of the existing vegetation of the conservation areas is currently in a moderate to low
quality natural condition or degraded semi - natural condition. All natural areas within the
designated conservation areas will require considerable resources to restore and/or manage
vegetation as natural plant communities well into the future. Furthermore, areas of very disturbed
semi - natural vegetation and non - native cover (i.e. degraded wet meadows, degraded shrub
swamp, degraded emergent marsh etc.), will require restoration tasks such as invasive and exotic
vegetation removal, chemical and manual treatments and/or biological controls of noxious weed
species, and replanting /reseeding with native plant community cover.
To reduce the resources required for restoring and managing native vegetation within the
conservation areas, pre- existing natural communities will not be converted to other natural
community types. Figure 6 illustrates the location and extent of prescribed natural and semi -
natural vegetation types within the conservation areas. Rather, existing natural communities will
be managed, improved, and augmented with appropriate native species seed mixes and plantings
when necessary. Furthermore, the developer shall restore and managed 11.9 acres of the
conservation areas in years one through three of the plan. Additional resources will be required
to implement the restoration of the remaining 29 acres within the conservation outlots
(specifically, Outlot D). The following are detailed descriptions of natural community types
(wet meadow, shallow /mixed emergent marsh, wet prairie, dry prairie /oak savanna, and oak
forest) that have been prescribed for the conservation areas, as depicted in Figure 6. Native
species list appropriate for re- seeding, planting, and re- establishing natural communities that are
specified in the following text are provided in Appendix C.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 12
•
•
OW Oak Woodland
AW Aspen Woodland
WP Wet Prairie
OS Oak Savanna
MEM Mixed Emergent Marsh
WM Wet Meadow
SS Shrub Swamp
IP Infiltration Pond
WMT Wetland Mitigation
Existing Ditch
Conservation Easements and Outlots
Residential Lot Lines
300 0 300 Feet
Critical Connections
Ecological Services, Inc.
The Preserve Conservation Development
Conservation Area Restoration and Management Plan
T31N R22W Sections 28 and 33
Lino Lakes. Minnesota
8•VISTO Auaus+ 1f%, <iA7q
Figure 6
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 13
Wet Meadow
Wet Meadow occurs within wetlands throughout all of Minnesota. The ground layer of the Wet
Meadow community is composed of dense, closed stands of predominately wide - leaved sedges
(e.g., Carex lacustris, C. stricta, C. aquatilis C. rostrata, C. haydenii) or grasses (e.g.,
Calamagrostis canadensis, C. inexpansa). Forb cover and diversity usually are high. Forbs such
as spotted joe -pye weed (Eupatorium maculatum), common mint (Mentha arvensis), turtlehead
(Chelone glabra), and swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata) are conspicuous. Shrub cover in
Wet Meadows ranges from 0 to 70% and is composed of Bebb's willows and pussy willows.
Mosses are rare or absent.
Wet Meadow occurs on wet mineral soil, muck, or shallow peat ( <0.5 m). Standing water
(generally stagnant) is present in the spring and after heavy rains, but the water table is generally
below the soil surface for most of the growing season. The drawdown of the water table as the
growing season progresses enables the oxidation of dead organic matter that has accumulated on
the ground surface from previous years. This process makes available nutrients for some of the
nutrient - demanding species present in the community. Occurrences of Wet Meadow along
stream courses or adjacent to lakes often have fairly constant water levels relative to Wet
Meadows in depressions or basins. On these sites siltation may be important in maintaining high
nutrient levels.
Wet Meadow tends to succeed to Shrub Swamp communities in the absence of fire, and
therefore, there is a Shrub Subtype of the Wet Meadow community. Water -table lowering caused
by drought or by ditching promotes succession of Wet Meadow to Shrub Swamps. Wet
Meadows on organic soils, like other communities that occur on organic soils, recover very
slowly, if at all, once altered by artificial flooding or draining.
Shallow/Mixed Emergent Marsh
Mixed emergent marsh is dominated by wetland species other than cattails. Bulrushes are the
most common dominants, especially hard - stemmed bulrush (Scirpus acutus), river bulrush
( Scirpus fluviatilis), softstem bulrush (Scirpus validus), Scirpus americanus, and Scirpus
heterochaetus. Common reed grass (Phragmites australis), spike rushes (Eleocharis spp.), and
(in some river backwaters) prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata) are less common dominants. In
general, Mixed Emergent Marsh tends to occur on harder pond, lake, or river bottoms than
Cattail Marsh and is less likely to contain the forbs that grow on the floating peat mats present in
many cattail marshes. Broad - leaved arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia) and aquatic macrophytes are
the most common non - graminoid associates. Many Mixed Emergent Marsh species are sensitive
to fertilizer run -off and other artificial disturbances, and disturbed Mixed Emergent Marshes
(especially in the Prairie Zone) tend to convert to Cattail Marshes or become strongly dominated
by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) or common reed grass (Phragmites australis),
species that increase in abundance with disturbance.
Mixed Emergent Marsh is a broad community type, encompassing all marshes dominated by
species other than cattails. Therefore, sub - typing or recognition of new marsh types is likely
following more thorough inventories of these marshes. New divisions most likely will be made
according to dominant species or basin types (e.g., lacustrine versus riverine), or both. There are
two geographic sections, a Forest Section and a Prairie Section. The dominant species in the
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 14
•
•
•
Prairie Section tend to have a Great Plains distribution while those in the Forest Section tend to
have a Great Lakes distribution.
Wet Prairie
Wet prairies are prairie- species dominated grassland communities growing on saturated and
temporarily flooded soils with <30% tree cover and <50% shrub cover ( <30% in northwestern
Minnesota).
Wet prairie occurs mainly in the southern and western parts of Minnesota's prairie ecoregion,
with scattered occurrences in the deciduous forest - woodland ecoregion. Typically, grasses
dominate wet prairies, but sedges are also important in the community. The major cover - forming
grasses in wet prairies in eastern Minnesota are prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata) and blue -
joint (Calamagrostis canadensis). Prairie cordgrass and blue joint are also present in Wet
Prairies in western Minnesota, but the major cover - forming grasses in the west are bog reed -
grass (Calamagrostis inexpansa), big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), and the low grass, mat
muhly (Muhlenbergia richardsonis). Other common grasses in the community are switchgrass
(Panicum virgatum), wheatgrass (Agropyron trachycaulum), fowl meadow grass (Poa palustris),
and sweet grass (Hierochloe odorata). The introduced grass redtop (Agrostis stolonifera) is often
present on disturbed sites. Common Wet Prairie sedges are Carex lanuginosa, C. sartwellii, C.
tetanica, and, in the west, C. praegracilis. Stiff rush (Juncus balticus) is frequently present.
Forbs are abundant in Wet Prairies, but on the whole fewer forb species occur in Wet Prairie than
in Mesic Prairie. Common widespread Wet Prairie forb species are panicled aster (Aster
lanceolatus), New England aster (A. novae - angliae), meadow ragwort (Senecio pseudaureus),
giant goldenrod (Solidago gigantea), Riddell's goldenrod (S. riddellii), giant sunflower
(Helianthus giganteus), sawtooth sunflower (H grosseserratus), sneezeweed (Helenium
autumnale), gay- feather (Liatris pycnostachya), blazing -star (L. ligulistylis), grass- leaved
goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia), Indian hemp (Apocynum sibiricum), golden alexanders
(Zizia aurea), closed gentian (Gentiana andrewsii), yellow star -grass (Hypoxis hirsuta), marsh
vetchling (Lathyrus palusiris), tall meadow rue (Thalictrum dasycarpum), prairie loosestrife
(Lysimachia quadrora), Virginia mountain -mint (Pycnanthemum virginianum), swamp
lousewort (Pedicularis lanceolata), and northern bog violet (Viola nephrophylla). Small willows
(pussy willow and other willow species) and meadowsweet are common in the community;
willow and aspen trees are also sometimes present, growing either singly or scattered in small
clumps along wetland margins.
Wet Prairie is a fire - dependent community, with shrub and tree cover increasing in the
community in the absence of fire (though regular haying will also prevent increased shrub and
tree cover in the community.) Wet Prairie occurs in low areas (such as depressions and
drainageways) where the water table remains within the plant- rooting zone for several weeks
during the growing season, but where inundation occurs only infrequently and briefly. In some
Wet Prairies groundwater seepage causes soils to be very moist or wet. Wet Prairie is especially
common on broad, poorly drained flats in the Glacial Lake Agassiz Interbeach Area, where there
are many areas of artesian seepage. In the deciduous forest - woodland zone, Wet Prairie exists on
broad, nearly level river terraces or in shallow depressions on outwash.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 15
•
•
•
The soils within the community are mainly mollisols (aquolls). They range in texture from silty
clays to fine sands and are somewhat poorly drained to very poorly drained. Impermeable
subsurface layers impede soil drainage on some sites, and a thin layer of muck may be present at
the ground surface on Wet Prairies in seepage areas. Most soils are calcareous. Salt
concentrations (sulfates of calcium and magnesium) high enough to influence the species
composition of the community are present in the soils of Wet Prairies along the western edge of
Minnesota, primarily in the Agassiz Lacustrine Plain. On drier sites Wet Prairie often grades into
wet -mesic stands of Mesic Prairie; on wet sites it often grades into Wet Meadow. Mesic Prairie,
Wet Prairie, and Wet Meadow do not have well - defined floristic boundaries, and sometimes are
difficult to separate from one - another in the field when they occur together. Shrub cover
increases in Wet Prairie northward, and in the northern part of the community's range Wet Prairie
often grades into Wet Brush- Prairie. Wet Prairie in southeastern Minnesota is distinctive from
that elsewhere in the state, containing several species with restricted distribution. Floristic
diversity is low in Wet Prairies in western Minnesota, but distinctive species assemblages occur
there in association with saline sites.
Dry Prairie /Oak Savanna
Dry Prairies are upland grasslands dominated by prairie species, with <10% tree cover and <50%
shrub cover, where the substrate is composed of sand or gravel (sometimes with a thin organic
surface layer), or any texture on steep slopes. (Some examples may occur on sandy soils in
temporarily flooded areas). Dry Prairie is a type of Upland Prairie, which occurs primarily in the
prairie zone, with scattered occurrences in the deciduous forest - woodland zone. These
communities are dominated by grasses. The tall grasses, big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii) and
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), are the major dominants on moist sites. Prairie dropseed
(Sporobolus heterolepis) is common on both dry and moist sites. Forbs typically are abundant
(but subdominant to the grasses) and may have high local diversity. Forb species composition
varies with site moisture, although some forb species occur on almost all sites, moist or dry.
Several low shrub or sub -shrub species are common on Upland Prairie; the most characteristic is
leadplant (Amorpha canescens). Taller brush and trees are absent or scattered, however brush or
woodland areas may be interspersed with prairie, usually in association with topographic and
aquatic features that provide protection from fire.
The most important cause of variation in species composition in prairie communities is variation
in soil moisture. The local soil moisture regime is determined by slope, aspect, proximity to the
water table, and soil texture. On a regional scale, variation in species composition is primarily
caused by climatic variation (i.e., the westward decline in precipitation and northward decline in
temperature in Minnesota).
Upland Prairies occur on a range of landforms in the prairie zone, from nearly flat glacial
lakeplains to steep morainic slopes. In the deciduous forest - woodland zone, prairies occur on
droughty, level outwash areas and steep south- and west - facing slopes. The pre- European
settlement distribution of prairie was related to the interaction of local fire frequency with growth
rates of woody species: where conditions were favorable for rapid growth, more frequent fires
were necessary to maintain prairie over savanna, woodland, or forest. Fragmentation of Upland
Prairie since European settlement has reduced fire frequency throughout the prairie and
deciduous forest - woodland zones, and most prairie remnants have more brush and trees than
were present in the past.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 16
•
Dry Prairie is a dry to dry-mesic herbaceous community dominated by grasses and sedges. It
occurs throughout the prairie zone and sporadically in the deciduous forest - woodland zone. Dry
Prairie has considerable variation in species composition, reflecting interactions among
geography (namely climate), soils, and topography. In general, Dry Prairies have a greater
component of Great Plains species than Mesic Prairies, especially in prairies in the western part
of Minnesota. Big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii) is always present in the community and
usually important, but it does not achieve the dominance it typically has in Mesic Prairie.
Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans) is more limited in occurrence, generally appearing only where
conditions approach mesic. Mid - height and short grasses and sedges are usually dominant in Dry
Prairie. Among the more common are porcupine grass (Stipa spartea), little bluestem
(Schizachyrium scoparium), side -oats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula), prairie June -grass
(Koeleria macrantha), and sun - loving sedge (Carex heliophila).
Forb variation within the community is more pronounced. Some widespread, characteristic
species are dotted blazing star (Liatris punctata), pasque flower (Pulsatilla nuttalliana), prairie
golden -aster (Heterotheca villosa), stiff sunflower (Helianthus rigidus), silky aster (Aster
sericeus), green milkweed (Asclepias viridora), stiff goldenrod (Solidago rigida), gray
goldenrod ( Solidago nemoralis), Missouri goldenrod (Solidago missouriensis), and narrow -
leaved puccoon (Lithospermum incisum). Dry Prairies share many forb species with Mesic
Prairies, including rough blazing star ( Liatris aspera), buffalo -bean (Astragalus crassicarpus),
tooth - leaved evening primrose (Calylophus serrulatus), silverleaf scurfpea (Psoralea
argophylla), thimbleweed (Anemone cylindrica), Louisiana sagewort (Artemisia ludoviciana),
prairie larkspur (Delphinium virescens), heart- leaved alexanders (Zizia aptera), purple prairie -
clover (Petalostemon purpureum), hoary puccoon (Lithospermum canescens), prairie smoke
(Geum trorum), and wood lily (Lilium philadelphicum).
Three sub - shrubs -- leadplant (Amorpha canescens), prairie rose (Rosa arkansana), and wolfberry
(Symphoricarpos occidentalis) -- typical in Mesic Prairies are also generally present in Dry
Prairie. Soil - encrusting lichens and the fern-ally rock - spikemoss (Selaginella rupestris) are often
common in Dry Prairie. Brush, and sometimes trees, may be present in hollows and draws. Bur
oak (Quercus macrocarpa), chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), wild plum (Prunus americana),
and smooth sumac (Rhus glabra) are the most widespread woody species. Other woody species
more limited in distribution in the community are northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis), black
oak (Quercus velutina), and hazel (Corylus americana).
Dry Prairies are maintained by fire but require less frequent fires than mesic and wet prairies
because the droughty conditions within Dry Prairies slow or prevent the growth of woody
species. Dry Prairie occurs on a variety of landforms, including sand dune blankets of mid -
Holocene origin, glacial lake beach ridges, outwash deposits, ice - contact features (kames,
eskers), morainic hills, erosional slopes in glacial drift, and bedrock -cored bluffs. Soils range
from nearly pure sand with little profile development, to mollisols, although the latter have a
much thinner organic -rich surface horizon than the soils of Mesic Prairie. All overlie deep glacial
drift except for those of the bedrock -cored bluffs, which are formed in a thin layer of loess or
residuum. Soils are well drained to excessively drained. Depending upon the degree of slope, the
slope aspect, and the soil composition, Dry Prairie intergrades with Mesic Prairie.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 17
•
•
•
Oak savannas are upland plant communities with 10 -70% cover by trees (of which <25% is
conifer), where >30% of non -tree cover is herbaceous (prairie- dominated) and where oaks
comprise >30% of the tree cover. The soil is composed of sand or gravel (sometimes with a thin
organic surface layer), or any texture on steep slopes. This dry to dry -mesic community is most
common in the deciduous forest - woodland zone, but also occurs sporadically throughout the
prairie zone. The principal trees are bur oaks and northern pin oaks, but black oaks are also
common in the southeast. Northwards, quaking aspens become more frequent in the community.
The stature and spacing of trees is somewhat variable, reflecting differences in soils, topography,
and climate, factors that strongly affect local droughtiness and fire frequency. Small, gnarly,
open -grown trees are most common, although in moister spots, or in heavier soils, larger trees
are sometimes more common. Tree spacing ranges from sparsely and evenly distributed to
strongly clumped in moderately dense patches. Shrub cover is variable as well. The species
composition of the shrub layer depends somewhat upon soil characteristics. Oak grubs and
chokecherries are common on all soil types. On sandier soils, prairie willows (Salix humilis),
New Jersey tea (Ceanothus americanus), American hazelnuts (Corylus americana), sand cherries
(Prunus pumila), and juneberries (Amelanchier spp.) are usually present. Wolfberries
(Symphoricarpos occidentalis) are commoner on heavier soils.
Dry Oak Savanna occurs on the same kinds of landforms as Dry Prairie, except for bedrock
bluffs. Correspondingly, substrates range from excessively- drained to well- drained, sand to loam
soils. The presence of savanna rather than prairie indicates a lower fire frequency or intensity (or
both) than in prairie. Dry Oak Savanna requires less frequent fire than Mesic Savanna for
maintenance. However, in the complete absence of fire woodland will eventually replace Dry
Oak Savanna. Grazing and browsing animals may also have had a role in the maintenance of Dry
Oak Savanna. Because Dry Oak Savanna occurs on sites that are not as suitable for cultivation as
Mesic Savanna sites, and because succession in the absence of fire is not as rapid, more
examples remain of Dry Oak Savanna than of Mesic Oak Savanna.
Oak Forest
Oak Forest is an upland deciduous forest with >30% oaks, and is common and widespread
throughout much of Minnesota. It is most common on dry to dry -mesic sites in the deciduous
forest - woodland zone but also occurs occasionally in the southern and western parts of the
conifer - hardwood zone, and in stream valleys in the prairie zone.
At least 30% of the tree canopy in an Oak Forest is made up of oak trees. Most often aspen,
paper birch, or black cherry trees make up the remainder of the canopy. The actual composition
of the community, however, varies considerably in response to variation in soil moisture, soil
type, fire history, and climate. The driest stands of Oak Forest are dominated by northern pin
oaks and white oaks, with black oaks, shagbark hickories, and sometimes bur oaks important in
southeastern Minnesota. These stands occur on nutrient -poor, well- drained sandy soils on
outwash plains, river terraces, and beach ridges. They have relatively open canopies, with
between 70% and 80% cover. The canopy height is usually between 13 and 17 meters.
Because of the open canopy, the shrub layer is often very dense. American hazel dominates the
shrub layer, which also often contains gray -bark dogwood, blueberries, and blackberries. Some
of the more common ground layer species are the sedge (Carex pensylvanica), wild geranium
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 18
•
•
(Geranium maculatum), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus inserta), wild sarsaparilla (Aralia
nudicaulis), and hog - peanut (Amphicarpaea bracteata).
Commonly, at least some of the oak trees in the dry stands have multiple stems and thick,
spreading lower branches, indicating that these trees grew up in a disturbed and more open
setting. Minnesota public land survey records indicate, in fact, that many of these dry stands
were oak savanna or oak woodland before European settlement and with fire suppression have
succeeded to forest. Oak regeneration is rare in these stands now, as the oak species reproduce
poorly under forest canopies. In the absence of fire, relatively mesic or fire- sensitive species such
as bitternut hickory, basswood, and red maple, are increasing in abundance in the community.
Northern red oaks, white oaks, or bur oaks dominate the more mesic stands of Oak Forest. These
stands occur on sites that had fewer severe fires before European settlement than the sites on
which dry Mixed Oak Forest occurs. These mesic stands most likely were always forest, rather
than woodland or savanna. They have tall (> 20 meters), straight, single - stemmed trees that lack
spreading lower branches. Commonly, mesic fire- sensitive tree species are present with the oaks
in these stands, especially in the understory. These species include basswood, green ash, bitternut
hickory, big- toothed aspen, and butternut.
The shrub layer in mesic stands is sparser than in dry stands and, correspondingly, the forb layer
is denser and more diverse and there are more graminoid species. Like the drier stands, however,
there is little oak regeneration, and most mesic Oak Forests appear to be succeeding to Maple -
Basswood forest. Heavy selective logging of the oaks in mesic stands may accelerate this trend,
producing young stands of Maple- Basswood Forest. The mesic stands often grade into drier
stands of Maple- Basswood Forest, but differ from them by having a somewhat denser shrub
layer and the herbs woodrush (Luzula acuminata) and pointed - leaved tick - trefoil (Desmodium
glutinosum) in their understory.
In general, most existing stands of Oak Forest have been disturbed by grazing or selective
cutting, or have been fragmented by development. Natural stands of mesic Mixed Oak Forest are
rare. Drier stands are more common, in part because relative to the mesic forests they occur on
sites with soils less suitable for cultivation. Additionally, dry Oak Forests may have increased in
extent somewhat following fire suppression, succeeding from oak savanna and woodland.
Disturbed stands of oak forest commonly have dense subcanopies of prickly ash, or of the exotic
species common buckthorn and Tartarian honeysuckle, which have also now invaded many
undisturbed stands. Disturbance through grazing may also be partly responsible for the lack of
regeneration in Oak Forests, especially in stands with heavy soils that compact readily with
trampling.
Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Area
The compensatory wetland mitigation area planned for construction is within a degraded upland
old -field over sandy, well - drained soils. In accordance with the site plan and wetland mitigation
plan, this old field will be excavated to a depth below the normal water table elevation to
facilitate the establishment of an on site compensatory wetland mitigation area. Native emergent
marsh, wet meadow, and wet prairie seed mixes appropriate to the region will be used to
revegetated the mitigation area. The wetland mitigation will be monitored and managed in
accordance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act rules for wetland replacement areas.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 19
• V. Restoration and Management Tasks and Timeline
The natural resource restoration and management recommendations contained within this section
are divided into two sections or phases: Phase 1 Restoration and Site Recovery (Outlots B and
C), and Phase 2 Maintenance and Adaptive Management, and Phase 3 (Additional Restoration
and Management Needs — Outlot D). Phase 1 includes natural resource restoration and
management tasks designed to address the major ecological problems on the site, restore native
vegetation to non - native landscapes, and improve the ecological structure and function of pre-
existing natural community remnants. Phase 2 includes management and maintenance tasks that
maintain the ecological structure and function of the site through time, and that adapt restoration
and management prescriptions based on the ecological response of restoration areas following
initial restoration treatments. Due to budget constraints, modifications to earlier versions (April
2006) of this plan have been made. Additional restoration and management activities and
additional financial resources will be necessary to complete the restoration and management of
Outlot D, as well as long -term maintenance, management, and stewardship of Outlots B and C.
A preliminary restoration and management plan and approach is provided under Phase 3
Additional Restoration and Management Needs — Outlot D.
Phase 1— Site Recovery and Restoration: Years 1 — 5 (Outlots B and C)
The activities listed in Phase 1 are particularly critical to the first five years of site restoration
and management. Changes in resource management prescriptions and implemented tasks during
this time period should be reviewed by professional ecologists, the City of Lino Lakes, and
project stakeholders to ensure that plan modifications are integrated and in agreement with other
ongoing and proposed management tasks, and contribute to the overall quality of the site. This
proposed timeline assumes site development (i.e. grading, logging, construction) will begin in
September 2006.
Phase 1 Restoration and Management Priorities (Outlots B and C)
(Summary timeline provided in Appendix A):
1) Salvage local - ecotype native forest wildflowers, ferns, shrubs, sedges and grasses from
oak forest areas that are proposed for development (prior to grading), transplanting in
forested (oak) conservation areas;
2) Control, remove, and manage invasive species — Reed canary grass, narrow leaved cattail,
common and glossy buckthorn, and Tartarian honeysuckle. Reed canary grass within
wetlands (and upland margins) and common buckthorn within forests and woodlands are
the most problematic species present on the site, and their management should be of the
utmost priority;
• Reduce abundance and cover of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) within
restored and managed wetlands within the conservation area,
• Reduce abundance and cover of invasive cattail (Typha angustifolia and T. x
glauca) in semi - permanently and permanently flooded wetland types.
• Reduce abundance and cover common and glossy buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica
and R. frangula), and Tartarian honeysuckle (Lonicera tatarica) in upland and
wetland edge areas.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 20
•
•
•
3) Restoration of native plant communities currently dominated by invasive /exotic species.
Re- introduce native, non - invasive vegetation appropriate to the site;
4) Re- introduction of natural disturbance regimes (such as prescribed fire) that restore and
maintain highly functioning natural systems;
5) Establish native species cover within the 1.0 acre wetland mitigation area, and monitor
establishment of vegetation and hydrology within wetland mitigation area;
6) Monitor rare plant populations;
7) Monitor the site's response to initial restoration and management treatments, and refine
management approach and methods as needed, and;
8) Install conservation area (outlot) boundary markers and interpretive signage that clearly
defines the boundaries of the conservation area.
Year One (September 1 through December 31, 2006) - Outlots B and C
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Salvage local - ecotype native forest wildflowers, ferns, and sedges from oak forest areas
that are proposed for development (prior to site grading and logging), transplant in
forested conservation areas (oak forests and woodlands) during the second and third
quarters of the first year, prior to site grading and/or logging;
• Reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass- specific herbicide
and /or Glyphosate herbicides in the fall (third and fourth quarters), so that the herbicide is
translocated into the root systems of reed canary grass. Monotypes of reed canary grass
will be treated with a boom sprayer. Small patches of reed canary grass will be
chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass- specific herbicides, to minimize impacts to
associated native sedges and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary grass will be
accomplished with a backpack sprayer to limit/eliminate overspray;
• Cattail monotypes will be chemically treated with Glyphosate and or Sethoxydim in the
spring and/or fall of year one;
• Common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn, and Tartarian honeysuckle will be cut and the
biomass removed from the site. Following cutting, stumps will be treated with
Glyphosate and/or Triclopyr herbicides to control re- sprouting. Cutting will be
accomplished with chainsaws and brush cutters (during the third and fourth quarter of the
first year, with herbicide treatment occurring immediately following cutting);
• The 1.0 acre wetland mitigation wetland will be seeded in the fourth quarter of the first
year (following construction) with suitable and appropriate native seed mixes;
• Residential rainwater gardens will be seeded with appropriate native seed mixes in the
second and third quarters of the first year following construction;
• Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second
and third quarters of the first year;
• Conservation area boundary markers and interpretive signage will be installed during the
second or third quarter of the year that construction begins, and;
• A qualified ecologist shall monitor grading and construction activities to ensure
compliance with the stewardship plan during site development (third and fourth quarters,
year one).
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 21
411 Year Two (January 1 through December 31, 2007) — Outlots B and C
•
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Cattail monotypes will be chemically treated with Glyphosate and or Sethoxydim in the
spring and /or fall;
• Reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicide
and/or Glyphosate herbicides in the spring and /or fall (second, third, and fourth quarters),
so that the herbicide is translocated into the root systems of reed canary grass.
Monotypes of reed canary grass will be treated with a boom sprayer. Small patches of
reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicides,
to minimize impacts to associated native sedges and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary
grass will be accomplished with a backpack sprayer to limit/eliminate overspray;
• Prescribed burn plans will be written and burn permits will be acquired in the first quarter
of the second year;
• Prescribed burning plan will be implemented within 11.9 acres of the conservation areas
(outlots B and C) in the early second quarter of year two (i.e. April and May), or the
fourth quarter of year two (i.e. October and November) if conditions in the spring are not
suitable to implement the prescribed burn;
• Resprouts of common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn, and Tartarian honeysuckle will be re-
cut and the biomass removed from the site. Following re- cutting, stumps will be treated
with Glyphosate and /or Triclopyr herbicides to control re- sprouting. Cutting will be
accomplished with chainsaws and brush cutters (during the third and fourth quarter of the
second year, with herbicide treatment occurring immediately following cutting);
• Residential rainwater gardens will be seeded and/or planted with appropriate native
species in the second and third quarters of the second year, following construction of the
rainwater gardens;
• Existing degraded native communities will be seeded with appropriate native seed mix
during the third and fourth quarters of the year two;
• The 1.0 acre wetland mitigation area will be monitored during second and third quarters
of the year;
• Reseeded degraded native communities will be monitored during the second through
fourth quarters of the second year;
• Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second
and third quarters of second year;
• Conservation area boundary markers and interpretive signage will be installed during the
second or third quarter of the second year;
• A wetland mitigation monitoring report will be completed during the fourth quarter of the
second year, and;
• A qualified ecologist shall monitor grading and construction activities to ensure
compliance with the stewardship plan during site development (all quarters, year two).
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 22
•
•
Year Three (January 1 through December 31, 2008) — Outlots B and C
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Prescribed burn plans will be written and burn permits will be acquired in the first quarter
of the third year;
• Prescribed burning plan will be implemented for native prairie remnants, pond edges,
native vegetation in infiltration basins, oak forest/woodland edges, and rare species
habitat (up to 11.9 acres) in the late first quarter, or early second quarter of year three (i.e.
March and/or April);
• Invasive species resprouts shall be re -cut and/or re- treated with appropriate herbicides in
the second, third, and fourth quarters of year three;
• Existing degraded native communities will be re- seeded with appropriate native seed mix
during the third and fourth quarters of the third year;
• The 1.0 acre wetland mitigation area will be monitored during second and third quarters
of the third year;
• Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second
and third quarters of the third year, and;
• A wetland mitigation monitoring report will be completed during the fourth quarter of the
third year, and;
• A qualified ecologist shall monitor grading and construction activities to ensure
compliance with the stewardship plan during site development (all quarters as needed,
year three).
Year Four (January 1 through December 31, 2009) — Outlots B and C
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Reseeded native communities will be monitored during the second and third quarters of
year four;
• Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second
and third quarters of year four;
• The 1.0 acre wetland mitigation area will be monitored during second and third quarters
of year four, and;
• A wetland mitigation monitoring report will be completed during the fourth quarter of the
fourth year.
Year Five (January 1 through December 31, 2010) — Outlots B and C
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Prescribed burn plans will be written and burn permits will be acquired in the first quarter
of the fifth year;
• Prescribed burning plan will be implemented for native prairie remnants, pond edges,
native vegetation in infiltration basins, oak forest/woodland edges, and rare species
habitat (up to 11.9 acres) in the late first quarter, or early second quarter of year five (i.e.
March and/or April);
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 23
•
•
•
• Re- seeded native communities will be monitored during the second through fourth
quarters of the fifth year;
• Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second
and third quarters of the fifth year;
• The 1.0 acre wetland mitigation area will be monitored during second through fourth
quarters of the fifth year, and;
• A final wetland mitigation monitoring report will be completed during the fourth quarter
of the fifth year, and submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District and US Army Corps
of Engineers for approval.
• A long -term adaptive management plan, based on five years of restoration, management,
and monitoring data, shall be developed and written by a qualified ecologist in the fourth
quarter of year five. The plan shall be reviewed by the city and The Preserve
Homeowner's Association prior to finalization. The long -term plan shall take consider
and strike a balance between ecological needs and financial constraints.
Phase 2 — Maintenance and Management: Years 5 -10+ - Outlots B and C
1) Monitoring and spot treatment of invasive species populations and effectiveness of
management practices;
2) Prescribed burning of wetlands, dry prairie /savannas, and oak/aspen woodland edges;
3) Monitoring of restoration successes and failures, vegetation diversity, and wildlife use;
4) Monitoring and resolution of residential encroachment into conservation areas,
unauthorized uses of conservation areas, and negative impacts associated with trail use
and maintenance, and;
5) Coordination among The Preserve's Homeowners Association, the City of Lino Lakes,
the project ecologist, and other project stakeholders to update management plan and
priorities, and allocated restoration and management resources.
*All tasks for Years 3 through 10 are to be funded by The Preserve's Homeowners
Association.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 24
•
Phase 3 — Additional Restoration and Management Needs - Outlot D
Phase 3 includes recommendations for implementing an ecological restoration and management
plan for Outlot D (29.9 acres, primarily partially drained wetland). As previously mentioned,
additional resources will need to be identified and obtained by the City and /or the Homeowner's
Association to successfully implement the restoration and management tasks described for
Outlot D. This conceptual plan assumes that hydrologic restoration (such as impoundments,
flooding, water retention) of the wetlands within Outlot D will not be possible, due to the
jurisdictional ditch that is established and maintained within Outlot D. However, hydrologic
restoration of the wetlands in Outlot D will bring about optimal ecological (and pre - settlement)
conditions, and opportunities to restore the pre -ditch hydrology of these wetlands (completely, or
in part) should be investigate.
If hydrologic restoration of these wetlands is possible in the future, through a collaborative
approach between the Homeowner's Association, the City, the US Army Corps of Engineers,
and/or the Rice Creek Watershed District, the following recommendations and restoration
approach should be revised so as to incorporate restored wetland hydrology and wetter
conditions within the proposed restoration area(s) of Outlot D. Opportunities to apply for,
design, and establish a wetland mitigation bank should be pursued by project collaborators prior
to implementation of restoration and management prescriptions. Establishment of a wetland
mitigation bank will require additional detailed documentation of pre- restoration environmental
conditions and ecological quality to justify the award of new wetland credits and public value
credits following the successful implementation of restoration and management activities and
documentation of restoration response and success. Furthermore, establishment of a wetland
mitigation bank will require more detailed monitoring a reporting of annual
changes /improvements to wetland vegetation and habitat conditions.
Year One (January 1 through December 31) - Outlot D
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Prescribed burn plans will be written and burn permits will be acquired in the first quarter
of the first year;
• Prescribed burning plan will be implemented within the wetlands and upland islands of
Outlot D (29.9 Acres) in the early second quarter of year one (i.e. April and May), or the
fourth quarter of year one (i.e. October and November) if conditions in the spring are not
suitable to implement the prescribed burn;
• Reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicide
and/or Glyphosate herbicides in the early spring (late second quarter) or fall (third and
fourth quarters). Monotypes of reed canary grass will be treated with a boom sprayer
with Glyphosate herbicide. Small patches of reed canary grass will be chemically treated
with Sethoxydim grass- specific herbicides, to minimize impacts to associated native
sedges and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary grass will be accomplished with a
backpack sprayer to limit/eliminate overspray;
• Cattail monotypes will be chemically treated with Glyphosate in the fall (third or fourth
quarters) of year one.
• Common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn, and Tartarian honeysuckle will be cut from
upland islands and the biomass removed from the site. Following cutting, stumps will be
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 25
•
•
treated with Glyphosate and /or Triclopyr herbicides to control re- sprouting. Cutting will
be accomplished with chainsaws and brush cutters (during the third and fourth quarter of
the first year, with herbicide treatment occurring immediately following cutting);
Year Two (January 1 through December 31) — Outlot D
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Following resprout, Reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass -
specific herbicide and/or Glyphosate herbicides in the early spring (late second quarter)
or fall (third and fourth quarters) of year two. Monotypes of reed canary grass will be
treated with a boom sprayer with Glyphosate herbicide. Small patches of reed canary
grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicides, to minimize
impacts to associated native sedges and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary grass will be
accomplished with a backpack sprayer to limit/eliminate overspray;
• Re- sprouting cattail monotypes will be chemically treated with Glyphosate in the fall
(third or fourth quarters) of year two.
• Resprouts of common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn, and Tartarian honeysuckle will be re-
cut and the biomass removed from the site. Following re- cutting, stumps will be treated
with Glyphosate and/or Triclopyr herbicides to control re- sprouting. Cutting will be
accomplished with chainsaws and brush cutters (during the third and fourth quarter of the
second year, with herbicide treatment occurring immediately following cutting);
• The project ecologist shall monitor the response of invasive and native species to
prescribed burning and chemical/herbicide treatments, and assess additional treatment
needs for year three (prior to re- seeding with native species mixes).
Year Three (January 1 through December 31) — Outlot D
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Prescribed burn plans will be written and burn permits will be acquired in the first quarter
of the third year;
• Prescribed burning plan will be implemented for all habitats (29.9 acres) in Outlot D.
The prescribed burn will be implemented in the late first quarter, or early second quarter
of year three (i.e. March and/or April);
• If necessary, resprouts of reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim
grass - specific herbicide and/or Glyphosate herbicides in the early spring (late second
quarter) or fall (third and fourth quarters) of year three. Monotypes of reed canary grass
will be treated with a boom sprayer with Glyphosate herbicide. Small patches of reed
canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicides, to
minimize impacts to associated native sedges and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary
grass will be accomplished with a backpack sprayer to limit/eliminate overspray;
• If necessary, resprouts of invasive cattails will be chemically treated with Glyphosate in
the fall (third or fourth quarters) of year three.
• If necessary, resprouts of common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn, and Tartarian
honeysuckle will be re -cut and the biomass removed from the site. Following re- cutting,
stumps will be treated with Glyphosate and/or Triclopyr herbicides to control re-
sprouting. Cutting will be accomplished with chainsaws and brush cutters (during the
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 26
• third and fourth quarter of the third year, with herbicide treatment occurring immediately
•
•
following cutting);
Year Four (January 1 through December 31) — Outlot D
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Reseeded native communities will be monitored during the second and third quarters of
year four;
• Invasive upland and wetland species will be monitored in the second and third quarters of
year four, and invasive species resprouts will be chemically treated with appropriate
herbicides, where needed, in the late third quarter and /or early fourth quarter of year four;
Year Five (January 1 through December 31, 2010) — Outlot D
Restoration and Management Tasks
• Reseeded native communities will be monitored during the second and third quarters of
year five. If needed, additional native seed will be ordered in the third quarter of year
five, and dispersed in appropriate habitats in the early fourth quarter of year five;
• Invasive upland and wetland species will be monitored in the second and third quarters of
year five, and invasive species resprouts will be chemically treated with appropriate
herbicides, where needed, in the late third quarter and/or early fourth quarter of year five;
• A long -term adaptive management plan for Outlot D, based on five years of restoration,
management, and monitoring data, shall be developed and written by a qualified ecologist
in the fourth quarter of year five. The plan shall be reviewed by the city and The
Preserve Homeowner's Association, and other project collaborators /stake holders, prior
to finalization. The long -term plan shall take consider and strike a balance between
ecological needs and financial constraints.
Maintenance and Management: Years 5 -10+ - Outlot D
6) Monitoring and spot treatment of invasive species populations and effectiveness of
management practices;
7) Prescribed burning of wetlands, woodlands, and prairie habitats;
8) Monitoring of restoration successes and failures, vegetation diversity, and wildlife use;
9) Monitoring and resolution of residential encroachment into conservation areas,
unauthorized uses of conservation areas, and negative impacts associated with trail use
and maintenance, and;
10) Coordination among The Preserve's Homeowners Association, the City of Lino Lakes,
the project ecologist, and other project stakeholders to update management plan and
priorities, and allocated restoration and management resources.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 27
•
•
Invasive Species Management
Invasive species are clearly the most urgent management priority at The Preserve. Although
invasive species have established on the site, there is ample time to manage the relatively
concentrated populations of these species before they are able to spread further. However, if
invasive exotic species are left unchecked and untreated, they will continue to invade, establish,
and further degrade the remaining moderate quality natural vegetation within five to ten years
time. Once established as reproductive populations, natural community restoration and
management will be significantly more difficult and expensive within The Preserve's
conservation areas.
Common and Glossy Buckthorn
Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) and Glossy Buckthorn (R. frangula) are European
shrubs that invade and establish within native forest and woodland understories in Minnesota.
Once Buckthorn establishes within natural communities, it can out - compete most native species.
Common Buckthorn was observed in various densities throughout the forest and woodlands of
The Preserve. Glossy Buckthorn prefers wetland habitats, and was observed in very limited
numbers along wetland edges within the site.
Removal and management of Buckthorn can be a labor intensive and costly undertaking. A
long -term plan will likely be necessary to perpetually monitor and manage these species. The
first phase of managing Buckthorn includes locating and removing all mature, fruit producing
individuals, as to minimize seed dispersal and invasion. Seed producing plants are most
commonly found along sunny woodland edges, rather than in woodland or forest interiors. The
next phase of removal should include the removal of saplings and seedlings. When samplings
and seedlings are removed, native shrub and herbaceous specious should be planted to reduce the
risk of erosion, soil loss, and reinvasion of buckthorn and other undesirable species. CCES also
recommends coordination with landowners adjacent to The Preserve development, to secure
permission to remove and treat buckthorn along adjacent property boundaries, where feasible.
Replanting of native species on adjacent residential lands should be considered.
Reed Canary Grass
Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) is an invasive wetland grass that is very common to
degraded wetlands within the Minneapolis /Saint Paul metropolitan area and throughout
Minnesota. Reed Canary Grass is considered native to North America, but this species has been
hybridized and cultivated as an aggressive and naturalizing forage grass that is also used erosion
control in agricultural landscapes.
Reed Canary Grass is pervasive in all wetlands and in upland edges of The Preserve's
conservation areas. CCES recommends prompt management and treatment of Reed Canary
Grass beginning in fall of 2005. Reed Canary Grass can be effectively managed with a grass -
specific herbicide (Vantage) or non - specific herbicides (Rodeo and Round -Up), prescribed
burning, and manual removal (where feasible).
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 28
•
•
Spotted Knapweed
Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea maculata) is an invasive weed from Eurasia, often colonizing in
degraded sunny uplands, fallow agricultural fields, and remnant prairies. Spotted Knapweed was
observed as scattered individuals throughout the old fields of The Preserve. This relatively
sparse distribution suggests that immediate removal and treatment of this species would be very
cost effective. In time, this species will become much more problematic within open grasslands,
and will be much more difficult and expensive to remove and manage. Spotted Knapweed is
best removed with a standard pitchfork, or spot treated with a Glyphosate -based herbicide (such
as Round -Up). When manually removing these plants, it is very important to remove the entire
root system and basal rosette of leaves. Herbicide treatments of Spotted Knapweed often require
several repeated applications to completely eradicate an established population.
Surface Runoff Management and Erosion Control
Stormwater runoff and erosion control systems should remain in place and in working order
throughout the development of residential lots and construction of homes at The Preserve.
Regular scheduled monitoring and repair of these systems will significantly contribute to the
overall success of the restoration of The Preserve's conservation areas, especially within
wetlands. Erosion control structures and silt fences should be maintained along the conservation
area boundaries until perennial vegetation is established within the adjacent residential lots.
Once perennial vegetation has established, silt fences should be completely removed from the
site and discarded.
Maintain and Restore Soil Porosity in Developed Uplands
Site grading and development of the residential lots at The Preserve will likely result in the
pronounced compaction of surficial soil layers and reduced soil porosity within residential yards
and conservation areas edges. CCES and the City of Lino Lakes recommend that prior to final
landscaping of residential yards and installation of turf grass, sod, and other landscape plantings,
compacted soil surfaces (upper 6 to 12 inches) of residential yards and edges of conservation
areas should be roto - tilled and mixed with subsurface and topsoil layers to restore overall soil
porosity and deep root establishment. Preparation of soils in this manner will increase overall
soil porosity and stormwater infiltration, help to stabilize post - construction site hydrology,
improve turf grass establishment, and reduce stormwater runoff and chemical runoff into the
adjacent conservation areas. The City of Lino Lakes, Integra Homes, and the consulting
ecologist should work with individual home builders, landscape contractors, and homeowners to
ensure that this important site preparation step is accomplished on a lot by lot basis.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 29
Vegetation Establishment in Stormwater and Infiltration Ponds
Stormwater treatment ponds within The Preserve's conservation areas have been excavated and
rough graded during the initial site grading process in spring and summer of 2005. Water control
structures, such as inlet and outlet pipes and weirs where installed prior to the initial grading of
each stormwater basin. As required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, silt fences have
been installed along all edges of stormwater basins to minimize sedimentation of these basins or
erosion of sediment into the surrounding conservation areas or off site wetlands. Stormwater
treatment ponds will be final graded during the final phases of the overall site grading.
Stormwater treatment ponds within the conservation area should be seeded and maintained as
natural or semi - natural wetlands that compliment the surrounding natural communities within the
conservation area. Therefore, only native, non - invasive plant species should be seeded into
stormwater ponds. Native plant species that can tolerate fluctuating water levels and increased
sediments, salt, and nutrients should be selected for each basin, and native seed mixes should be
tailored to the design hydrology, soils, side slope profiles, and topographic configurations of
each stormwater treatment pond.
VI. Socio- Cultural Considerations and Recommendations
Signage Along Conservation Area /Residential Lot Boundaries
Integra Homes will install and The Preserve's Homeowner Association will maintain, repair and,
if necessary, replace the signage, which is placed within the conservation area. Wherever
possible and reasonable, conservation area signage will be installed during the initial land
development phase of The Preserve Conservation Development (Fall/Winter of 2006 or
Spring /Summer of 2007). Integra Homes will post up signs along rear lot lines and lot corners
that adjoin the conservation easements and/or outlots. Signage will also be placed in other
locations within the conservation area, as determined as necessary by the Integra Homes and the
City of Lino Lakes. The residential owner of each lot adjacent to the conservation area may not
remove, alter or damage the signs. Conservation area signage should be designed to be easily
recognizable, durable, and resistant damage by prescribed burning and other stresses associated
with restoration and management of the conservation areas. Signage should be tall enough (at
least 3 to 4 feet) to stand above native perennial prairie grasses and low shrubs, taking into
account the height of mature restored native vegetation within each conservation area.
Trails
A public pedestrian trail has been planned within upland and wetland portions of the
conservation areas and along the residential streetscape. The trail easement and infrastructure
will be owned and maintained by the City of Lino Lakes. Figure 7 illustrates the proposed
alignment of this trail corridor. Native and non - invasive plant species should be seeded and
established along the trail corridor following trail construction, consistent with the natural
communities the trail transects. Monitoring and management of problematic weed establishment
along the trail corridor should be conducted on an annual basis, as weed seeds are likely to be
introduced by trail users along the trail corridor. Although the trail may be cleared of snow by
plowing or shoveling, road salt and sand should not be used to manage snow or ice within the
conservation areas.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 30
IP
Bituminous Trail (Upland)
Boardwalk Trail (Wetland)
200 0 200
Designed L,DM
Drown LDM
Dote 8 /25 /05
Checked
Approved
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
M FRA P).'w �a��'0/ a
McCombs Frank Roos /dr )WJ /!1U -0532
Auawus, Inc
THE PRESERVE
UNO LAKES, MV
INTEGRA HOMES
PRELIMINARY PLAT
Figure 7
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan
31
•
Appropriate Uses
The Preserve's conservation areas will be managed as a natural open space with a passive
recreational trail corridor. Therefore, appropriate uses are limited to passive recreational
activities, such as: walking, running, nature and wildlife observation, ecological studies and such
other activities approved by The Preserve's Homeowners Association that will not disrupt or
degrade the ecological integrity of the site's natural resources and restoration areas. Biking and
dog walking may be considered as appropriate uses, should the site serve as a connection to a
regional bike path or walking path. However, such activities may disrupt natural areas, especially
when trail users stray from the designated trail corridor. Yard debris or commercial landscape
refuse should not be composted or disposed of within the conservation areas. Furthermore,
residential homeowners with yards adjoining the conservation areas should avoid encroachment
into designated outlots. Active recreational facilities, such as athletic fields and playgrounds, are
not considered appropriate uses for the conservation area. Artificial lighting should be carefully
sighted close to trail entrances and roads, and trail use may be limited to daylight hours.
VII. Recommendations for Monitoring & Adaptive Management
Ecological restoration and management is a process that involves adaptive decision making by
natural resource and planning professionals. Implementation of management activities are
designed to change natural community structure and functions, and these changes will likely
influence established management plans and strategies. For this reason, it is important to monitor
the results of implemented management activities and assess if changes to management plans
need to be made based on these observations. To maximize the effectiveness of restoration and
management actions and the likelihood of achieving desired natural resource management goals,
it is important to monitor chosen aspects of restoration and management projects on a regular
basis. Monitoring can be an expensive and labor- intensive process, or it may be done through
simple observations of environmental changes over time. Deciding what to monitor and how
extensive this monitoring should be are always difficult tasks. The level of effort in monitoring
will vary depending on available resources, staff, and/or qualified volunteers that may carry out
monitoring tasks.
At a minimum, the environmental characteristics that should be monitored within The Preserve's
conservation areas include:
1) The abundance and extent of invasive species, and the effect of management approaches
in reducing and limiting invasive species abundance over time;
2) The effects and relative success and failure of restoration and management actions to
achieve desired management goals over time;
3) The success of native restoration planting establishment, including species diversity,
seedling germination success, secondary weed species infestations, and opportunities for
natural community improvement over time;
4) Establishment of vegetation and design hydrology within wetland mitigation areas,
infiltration basins, and stormwater gardens, as well as sedimentation and/or erosion and
integrity of hydrologic infrastructure;
5) Changes in plant and wildlife diversity and wildlife habitat use within the restoration
areas;
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 32
•
•
•
6) Impacts of human use to the conservation areas' natural and cultural amenities, such as
trampling of restored vegetation, soil compaction, integrity of trails and signage, erosion,
weed introductions, dog walking and fecal matter, yard refuse and garbage, unauthorized
pesticide and fertilizer use.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 33
•
•
VIII. References
Aaseng, N.E., 1993. Minnesota's Native Vegetation. A Key to the Natural Communities, Version 3.1.
MN Department of Natural Resources Biological Report Number 20. Saint Paul, Minnesota
Bell Museum of Natural History, 2002. Minnesota Vascular Plant Database. www.wildflowers.umn.edu.
University of Minnesota. Saint Paul, Minnesota
Coffin, B., and L. Pfannmuller, 1998. Minnesota's Endangered Flora and Fauna. University of
Minnesota Press. Minneapolis, Minnesota
Dunevitz - Texler, H., and C. Lane, 2004. Species Lists for Terrestrial and Palustrine Native Plant
Communities in East - central Minnesota. Great River Greening and the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources. St. Paul, Minnesota
Gleason, H.A., and A Cronquist, 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern Unites States and
Adjacent Canada. Second Edition. New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, New York
Holmgren, Noel H., 1998. The Illustrated Companion to Gleason and Cronquist's Manual. Illustrations
of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. New York Botanical
Garden. Bronx, New York
Marschner, F.J. 1974. The Original Vegetation of Minnesota, a map compiled in 1930 by F.J. Marschner
under the direction of M.L. Heinselman of the U.S. Forest Service. St. Paul, MN: Cartography
Laboratory of the Department of Geography, University of Minnesota.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1996. Minnesota's List of Endangered, Threatened, and
Special Concern Species. Minnesota Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Saint
Paul, Minnesota
Ownbey, G., and T. Morley, 1991. Vascular Plants of Minnesota. A Checklist and Atlas. University of
Minnesota Press. Minneapolis, Minnesota
USDA NRCS, 2005. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
United States Department of Agriculture. Available online at
http: / /soils.usda.gov /technical /classification/osd /index.html
USDA SCS, 1977. Soil Survey of Anoka County, Minnesota. United States Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service and the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.
Saint Paul, Minnesota
Wovcha, D., B. Delaney, and G. Nordquist, 1995. Minnesota's St. Croix River Valley and Anoka
Sandplain. A Guide to Native Habitats. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis, Minnesota
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan 34
•
•
•
Appendix A
Restoration and Management Plan
Tasks and Timeline
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan A -1
(Revised August 10, 2006 for 11.9 acre restoration area)
p
N
Quarter
Year 5
1 2 3 4
CO
N
CO
N
v-
co
N
co
N
co
N
C)
N
v-
CO
N
cr
CO
N
Cr
C)
N
Sr
C)
N
cr
M
N
cr
co
N
1 2 3 4 1
(7
N
(o
N
2009 _
Quarter
Year 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
V
C)
N
V
C7
N
V
07
N
V
co
N
1 2 3 4 1
V
(h
N
V
(,)
N
2008
Quarter
Year 3
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
V
C-)
N
C
CO
N
1 [2 3 4]
V
co
N
C)
N
1 2 3 4
1 2 [3 4]
V
CO
N
V
CO
N
V
CO
N
V
co
N
1 2 3 4 1
Cr
co
N
V
C)
N
2007
Quarter
Year 2
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 [2 3 4]
(`7
N
V
co
N
[1] 2 3 4
1 [2 3 4]
V
co
N
u
N
(7
N
V
(h
N
V
M
N
V
co
N
[1 2] 3 4 1
V
co
N
V
(r)
N
(D
0
O
N
Quarter
Year 1
V
N
V
N
V
N
V
N
V
N
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 [4]
V
N
-
N
1 2 3 4
V
N
V
2.
N
1 2 [3 4]
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
'Tasks
Salvaging of Local- Ecotype Native Forest Herbaceous Plants
'Replanting Salvaged Forest Herbaceous Plants
Reed Canary Grass Management
Herbicide Treatment
Cattail Management
Herbicide Treatment
Invasive Shrub Management (Buckthorn and Honeysuckle)
Cutting /Removal /Herbicide Treatment
Burn Plan and Permits
Prescribed Burning
Seeding of 1.0 Acre Wetland Mitigation Area
Seeding of Existing Degraded Plant Communities
Restoration and Mitigation Monitoring
Wetland Mitigation Monitoring
Native Community Restoration Monitoring
Endangered Plant Population /Habitat Monitoring
Construction Monitoring (Environmental / Ecological Compliance)
Installation of Conservation Area Boundary Markers and Signage
Year -End Wetland Mitigation Monitoring Report (1.0 Acre Wetland Mitigation Only)
Create and Finalize a Long -Term Management Plan
a—
N
(h
-
(I)
(D
h
03
CO
0
N
03
V
1 = January - March
2 = April - June
3 = July - September
4 = October - December
•
•
Appendix B
The Preserve Soil Types
Official Soil Series Descriptions
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
United States Department of Agriculture (2005)
Available online at:
http: / /soils.usda.gov /technical /classification/osd/index.html
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -1
•
•
Isanti Soil Series
Official Soil Series Description
The Isanti series consists of very deep, poorly and very poorly drained soils that formed in sandy glacial
outwash or eolian sediments on outwash plains and valley trains. These soils have moderately rapid or
rapid permeability in the upper part and rapid permeability in the lower part. Slopes range from 0 to 2
percent. Mean annual precipitation is about 26 inches. Mean annual air temperature is about 44 degrees F.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Sandy, mixed, frigid Typic Endoaquolls
TYPICAL PEDON: Isanti fine sandy loam on a slightly concave slope of less than 1 percent in native
vegetation. (Colors described are for moist conditions unless otherwise stated.)
Al - -0 to 4 inches; black (10YR 2/1) fine sandy loam; weak medium platy structure; very friable; common
roots; strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
A2 - -4 to 10 inches; black (N 2/0) fine sandy loam; weak thin platy structure; very friable; common roots;
strongly acid; abrupt wavy boundary. (Combined thickness of A horizons is 7 to 18 inches.)
Bgl - -10 to 14 inches; gray (N 5/0) fine sand; single grain; loose; few roots; common very dark gray
(10YR 3/1) 1 to 3 cm thick discontinuous horizontal streaks and a few small black inclusions; moderately
acid; clear wavy boundary.
Bg2 - -14 to 26 inches; gray (10YR 5/1) fine sand; single grain; loose; few roots; strongly acid; abrupt
smooth boundary.
Bg3 - -26 to 31 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) fine sand; single grain; loose; moderately acid; abrupt wavy
boundary. (Combined thickness of Bg horizons is 13 to 36 inches.)
Cg - -31 to 60 inches; light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) fine sand; single grain; loose; moderately acid;
gradual smooth boundary.
TYPE LOCATION: Anoka County, Minnesota; about 7 miles east of Anoka; 1,345 feet east and 960
feet north of the southwest corner of sec. 5, T. 31 N., R. 23 W.; USGS Circle Pines quadrangle; lat. 45
degrees 12 minutes 0 seconds N. and long. 93 degrees 14 minutes 20 seconds W., NAD27.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: The series control section is dominated by fine sand and has 85
percent or more passing the No. 40 sieve. It also has no rock fragments. Some pedons have an 0 horizon
as much as 6 inches thick. The mollic epipedon ranges from 10 to 18 inches in thickness where texture is
loamy fine sand or coarser and 7 to 18 inches in thickness for those soils with finer textures.
The A horizon has hue of 10YR, 2.5Y, 5Y or is neutral. Some pedons have an AB or BA horizon as much
as 6 inches thick. The A horizon is loamy fine sand, fine sand, sand, loamy sand, fine sandy loam, or
sandy loam. It ranges from slightly acid to strongly acid.
The Bg horizons have hue of 10YR, 2.5Y or 5Y, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 1 or 2, or is neutral with
value of 4 or 5. In some pedons it has discontinuous nearly horizontal remnants as well as involutions of
the A horizon 0.5 to 10 cm thick that presumably resulted from frost action. It is fine sand, sand, loamy
fine sand or loamy sand. It ranges from slightly acid to strongly acid.
Some pedons have a BC horizon.
• The Cg horizon has hue of 10YR to 5Y, value of 5 or 6, and chroma of 1 or 2. It is sand, fine sand, loamy
sand, or loamy fine sand. Reaction is moderately acid to mildly alkaline.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -2
•
•
Isanti Soil Series (continued)
COMPETING SERIES: These ar e the Hamar, Hangaard, Isan, Medano, and Venlo soils. Hamar,
Hangaard, Medano, and Venlo soils have neutral or higher pH in the series control section. Isan soils have
less than 85 percent sand passing the No. 40 sieve.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: These soils have plane or concave slopes in depressions, drainageways, and
low flats on outwash plains and valley trains. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. The Isanti soils formed in
gravel free, noncalcareous sandy glacial outwash or eolian sediments of Late Wisconsinan Age. Mean
annual air temperature ranges from about 37 to 45 degrees F. Mean annual precipitation ranges from
about 22 to 33 inches. Frost -free days range from 90 to 150. Elevation above sea level ranges from 700 to
1600 feet.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are principally the Anoka, Lino, Sartell, and
Zimmerman soils. The Lino soils are on slightly higher elevations and are somewhat poorly drained. The
Anoka, Sartell, and Zimmerman soils are better drained.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Poorly and very poorly drained. Surface runoff is very low to
ponded. Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper part and rapid in the lower part. An apparent water
table is at plus 1 foot to 0.5 feet for the very poorly drained, depressional phase, and 0.5 to 1.5 feet for
poorly drained phase at some time Oct -June in most years.
USE AND VEGETATION: Mostly idle or in pasture, but some areas are drained and cropped to corn,
soybeans, potatoes, or sod. Native vegetation was primarily grasses, sedges, and willow.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: East central Minnesota and possibly northwestern Wisconsin.
Moderately extensive.
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: St. Paul, Minnesota
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Mille Lacs County, Minnesota, 1927.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and feature recognized in this pedon are: mollic epipedon - the zone
from the surface to 10 inches (A horizon); aquic subgroup - low chroma matrix immediately below the
mollic epipedon (Bgl horizon).
Classification only was changed 5/94. Competing series and other updates will be made later.
ADDITIONAL DATA: Refer Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Central File Code No. 1071
for results of some laboratory analyses of the typical pedon. SIR # MN0196; MN0651, depressional
phase.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -3
•
•
Soderville Soil Series
Official Soil Series Description
The Soderville series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils formed in sandy eolian or
glacial outwash on outwash plains. Permeability is rapid in upper part and moderately rapid in the lower
part. Slopes range from 0 to 3 percent. Mean annual precipitation is about 28 inches. Mean annual air
temperature is about 41 degrees F.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Sandy, mixed, frigid Oxyaquic Hapludalfs
TYPICAL PEDON: Soderville loamy fine sand on a 1 percent concave slope in a cultivated field at an
elevation of about 980 feet. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise noted.)
Ap - -0 to 9 inches; very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) loamy fine sand, grayish brown (10YR 5/2) dry;
weak fine subangular blocky structure; very friable; strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary. (6 to 9 inches
thick)
E1 - -9 to 21 inches; brown (10YR 4/3) fine sand, pale brown (10YR 6/3) dry; single grain; loose; strongly
acid; clear wavy boundary.
E2 - -21 to 30 inches; brown (10YR 5/3) fine sand, pale brown (10YR 6/3) dry; few fine distinct brown
(7.5YR 4/4) Fe concentrations; single grain; loose; strongly acid; abrupt wavy boundary. (9 to 32 inches
thick).
Btl - -30 to 41 inches; dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) loamy fine sand; few fine distinct strong brown
(7.5YR 4/6) Fe concentrations and common fine distinct grayish brown (10YR 5/2) Fe depletions; weak
medium subangular blocky structure; friable; faint discontinuous brown (10YR 4/3) clay films on faces of
peds; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
Bt2 - -41 to 45 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) loamy fine sand; common medium distinct strong
brown (7.5YR 4/6) Fe concentrations and few fine distinct light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) Fe depletions;
weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; faint discontinuous dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4)
clay films on faces of peds; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary. (6 to 19 inches thick).
E &Bt - -45 to 80 inches; light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) fine sand (E); single grain; loose; few dark
yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) loamy fine sand (Bt) lamellae 1/4 to 2 inches thick; weak fine subangular
blocky structure; very friable; distinct discontinuous brown (7.5YR 4/4) clay bridging between sand
grains; few fine distinct strong brown (7.5YR 4/6) Fe concentrations; moderately acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Mille Lacs County, Minnesota; about 1.5 miles east of Princeton; 500 feet south
and 2,500 feet east of the northwest corner of sec. 35, T. 36 N., R. 26 W.; USGS Princeton topographic
quadrangle; lat. 45 degrees 34 minutes 19 seconds N. and long. 93 degrees 32 minutes and 31 seconds
W.; NAD27.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Depth to the argillic horizon ranges from 24 to 60 inches below the
soil surface. These soils typically do not have rock fragments, but some horizons may have as much as 5
percent. Free carbonates are absent to 80 inches or more. Redox features are typically above a depth of 40
inches. Reaction ranges from strongly acid to moderately acid in the upper part of the solum. In areas
where lime has been added, the reaction range includes neutral. Reaction ranges from strongly acid to
neutral in the lower part of the solum and in the substratum.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -4
•
•
Soderville Soil Series (continued)
The Ap horizon has hue of 10YR, value of 3 or 4, and chroma of 1 or 2. Undisturbed pedons have black
(10YR 2/1) or very dark gray (10YR 3/1) A horizons ranging from 2 to 6 inches thick. It is fine sand or
loamy fine sand.
The E horizon has hue of 10YR, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 to 4. It is fine sand or loamy fine sand.
The Bt horizon has hue of 10YR or 7.5YR, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 3 or 4. It is typically loamy fine
sand or loamy sand, but the range includes fine sand or sand with increase of content of clay. Fine sandy
loam and sandy loam are included as lamellae and total less than 3 inches in thickness.
The E &Bt horizon has colors and textures similar to the E and Bt horizons. This horizon consists of
multiple lamellae bands with intervening E horizons.
Some pedons have a C horizon with hue of 10YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 2 or 3. It is fine sand or
sand.
COMPETING SERIES: There are no other series in this family.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: These soils have plane to slightly concave slopes. Slope gradients range
from 0 to 3 percent. The Soderville soils formed in deep sandy eolian or outwash sediments on outwash
plains. These sediments are of Wisconsin in age. Mean annual air temperature ranges from 38 to 45
degrees F. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 24 to 30 inches. Frost free days range from 90 to 145.
The elevation above sea level ranges from 670 to 1450 feet.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the Cantlin and Zimmerman soils. The
moderately well drained Cantlin soils occupy similar landscape positions, but do not have lamellae. The
excessively drained Zimmerman soils occupy higher landscape positions.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Moderately well drained. Runoff is negligible. Permeability is
rapid in the upper part and moderately rapid in the lower part. Soderville soils have a perched seasonal
high water table at a depth of 2.0 to 3.5 feet at some time from April to June in most years.
USE AND VEGETATION: Most areas of this soil are used for cropland. Common crops are corn, small
grain, and hay. Some areas are used as woodland. Common trees are jack pine, eastern white pine, red
pine, and northern red oak.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: East - central Minnesota. This soil is of small extent.
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: St. Paul, Minnesota.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Anoka County, Minnesota, 1972.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and other features recognized are: ochric epipedon - the zone from the
surface to 30 inches (Ap, El, and E2 horizons); argillic horizon - the zone from 30 to 45 inches (Btl and
Bt2 horizons);
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -5
Zimmerman Soil Series
Official Soil Series Description
The Zimmerman series consists of very deep, excessively drained soils that formed in sandy glacial
outwash or eolian sediments on glacial outwash plains, stream terraces, deltas, lake terraces, dunes, beach
deposits and valley trains. These soils have rapid permeability. Their slopes range from 0 to 60 percent.
Mean annual precipitation is about 28 inches. Mean annual air temperature is about 41 degrees F.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Mixed, frigid Lamellic Udipsamments
TYPICAL PEDON: Zimmerman fine sand with a slope of 1 percent on a glacial outwash plain in a
cultivated field. (Colors are for moist conditions unless otherwise stated.)
Ap - -0 to 7 inches; very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) fine sand, grayish brown (10YR 5/2) dry; weak
very fine subangular blocky structure; very friable; few very fine roots; moderately acid; abrupt smooth
boundary. (0 to 9 inches thick)
E - -7 to 27 inches; brown (10YR 4/3) fine sand; weak very fine subangular blocky structure; very friable;
few very fine roots; slightly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (0 to 30 inches)
Bw - -27 to 44 inches; very pale brown (10YR 7/4) fine sand; single grain; loose; few very fine roots;
moderately acid; abrupt irregular boundary. (6 to 36 inches thick)
E' &Bt - -44 to 80 inches; very pale brown (10YR 7/4) fine sand (E); single grain; loose; few dark brown
(7.5YR 4/4) loamy fine sand (Bt) lamellae 1/4 to 1 1/2 inches thick, irregular and discontinuous; weak
fine subangular blocky structure; very friable; clay bridging between sand grains; moderately acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Sherburne County, Minnesota; about 2 miles south of Santiago, 100 feet north and
780 feet west of southeast corner sec. 17, T. 35 N., R. 28 W. ; USGS Santiago quadrangle; lat. 45 degrees
30 minutes 58 seconds N and long. 93 degrees 50 minutes 37 seconds W., NAD27.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: The lamellae typically range from 24 to 60 inches below the soil
surface but are deeper than 60 inches in some pedons. Free calcium carbonate is at depths greater than 60
inches. Rock fragments range from 0 to 5 percent throughout the profile. The control section averages
between about 40 and 70 percent fine sand. The content of very fine sand is similar to the content of
medium sand. The content of coarse sand is less than 5 percent and very coarse sand is less than 1
percent.
The Ap or A horizons have hue of 7.5YR, 10YR or is neutral, value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 0 to 2. An
Ap horizon up to 10 inches thick with hue of 10YR, value of 4, and chroma of 2 or 3 is in some pedons.
The E and E' horizons have hue of 10YR or 7.5YR, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 to 4. The A and E
horizons are fine sand or loamy fine sand. Soil reaction is strongly acid to slightly acid.
The Bw horizon has hue of 10YR or 7.5YR with value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 3 to 8. It is fine sand,
loamy fine sand, or loamy very fine sand. Soil reaction is strongly acid to neutral.
The Bt part consists of one or more thin irregular discontinuous or continuous lamellae or bands that
begin at depths ranging from 15 to 80 inches. They range from 1/16 of an inch thick to no more than 3
inches thick if loamy and no more than 6 inches thick if sandy. They have hue of 5YR to 10YR; value is 3
to 6, and chroma of 2 to 7. Typically, they are fine sand or loamy fine sand, but the range includes very
fine sand, loamy very fine sand, and fine sandy loam. The lamellae commonly have 2 to 3 times as much
clay as adjacent E' soil material.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -6
•
•
•
Zimmerman Soil Series (continued)
The C horizon when present, has hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 2 to 6. It is
typically sand or fine sand, but some pedons have thin finer or coarser textured strata.
COMPETING SERIES: These are the Biwabik (T), Eagleview, Faunce, Graycalm and Grettum (T)
series. Biwabik soils have more than 5 percent rock fragments in the series control section. Eagleview
soils have less than 40 percent fine sand in the series control section. Faunce soils have free calcium
carbonate above 40 inches. Graycalm soils have more than 6 percent coarse sand or coarser in the series
control section. Grettum soils are saturated in the lower third of the series control section.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: These soils are nearly level to steep with convex slopes on outwash and
lake plains, stream terraces, deltas lake terraces, dunes, and valley trains. Slopes are short and irregular
with slope gradients of 0 to 60 percent. The Zimmerman soils formed in deeply leached, glacial outwash,
lacustrine, or eolian origin. These sediments are Late Wisconsinan Age. Mean annual air temperature
ranges from about 36 to 45 degrees F. Mean annual precipitation ranges from about 22 to 34 inches.
Frost -free days range from 88 to 150. Elevation above sea level ranges from 670 to 1600 feet.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the excessively drained Sartell soils, well
drained Anoka soils, moderately well drained Cantlin soils, somewhat poorly drained Soderville, and the
poorly and very poorly drained Isanti soils. The Sartell, Cantlin, Lino, Soderville, and Isanti soils are in a
hydrosequence with the Zimmerman soils. The Anoka soils have an argillic horizon whose lamellae total
more than 6 inches thick.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Excessively drained. Surface runoff is negligible to low.
Permeability is rapid.
USE AND VEGETATION: Most of the acreage in southern part is used to grow alfalfa, corn, and
soybeans. Most in northern areas remain in forest. Native vegetation was primarily mixed oak forest or
jack pine and red pine.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: East - central and north- central Minnesota, Northern Lower and Upper
Peninsula of Michigan, and possibly northwestern Wisconsin. Extensive.
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: St. Paul, Minnesota
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Mille Lacs County, Minnesota, 1927.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and other features recognized are: Ochric epipedon - the zone from the
surface to 27 inches (A and E horizons); argic subgroup - lamellae totaling less than 6 inches within 60
inches (E' & Bt horizon). This soil was formerly classified as an Alfic Udipsamment. A thick solum phase
(60 to 80 inches) is being used- in the sand dunes of the Anoka Sand Plains. Type location moved from
Anoka County, Mn. to Sherburne County, Mn., 11/96 to better exemplify the series concept within the
MLRA.
ADDITIONAL DATA: Refer to MAES Central File Code Nos. 1079 and 1550 for results of some
laboratory analysis.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -7
•
•
•
Zimmerman Soil Series
Official Soil Series Description
The Lino series consists of very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils that formed in sandy glacial
outwash or eolian sediments on outwash plains and valley trains. These soils have rapid permeability.
Slopes range from 0 to 3 percent. Mean annual precipitation is about 26 inches. Mean annual air
temperature is about 44 degrees F.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Mixed, frigid Aquic Udipsamments
TYPICAL PEDON: Lino loamy fine sand with a plane slope of 1 percent on a glacial outwash plain in a
cultivated field. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap - -0 to 7 inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) loamy fine sand; weak fine subangular blocky
structure; very friable; moderately acid; abrupt smooth boundary. (6 to 10 inches thick)
Bw1 - -7 to 16 inches; brown (10YR 5/3) fine sand; many medium faint light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) Fe
depletions and distinct yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) Fe concentrations; weak fine and medium subangular
blocky structure; very friable; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bw2 - -16 to 45 inches; light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) fine sand; many coarse prominent reddish brown
(5YR 5/3) and yellowish red (5YR 4/6) Fe concentrations; single grain; loose; Fe concentrations mostly
vertically oriented and very weakly cemented when dry; moderately acid; gradual wavy boundary.
(Combined thickness of the Bw horizons is 18 to 40 inches.)
C - -45 to 60 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) fine sand; many coarse prominent reddish brown (5YR 5/4
and 4/3) and faint brown (10YR 5/3) Fe concentrations and distinct gray (10YR 6/1) Fe depletions;
massive breaking readily to single grained; very friable; reddish brown and brown Fe concentrations
weakly cemented when dry; slightly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Anoka County, Minnesota; about 3 miles north and 1 mile east of Circle Pines;
about 2,330 feet west and 1,630 feet north of the southeast corner of sec. 7, T. 31 N., R. 22 W.; USGS
Circle Pines quadrangle; lat. 45 degrees 11 minutes 12 seconds N. and long. 93 degrees 7 minutes 52
seconds W., NAD27
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Depth to free carbonates ranges from 50 to 100 inches or more.
The series control section and C horizon do not have rock fragments. Quartz comprises about 70 to 85
percent of the sand fraction. Typically, the particle -size control section averages fine sand, but sand is
within the range. The content of coarse and very coarse sand ranges from 0 to 5 percent in the particle -
size control section.
The Ap horizon has hue of 10YR, value of 2 to 4, and chroma of 1 or 2. It is loamy fine sand, loamy sand,
fine sandy loam, or fine sand. It is strongly acid or moderately acid.
Some pedons have an E horizon ranging to as much as 6 inches in thickness with hue of 10YR, value of 4
or 5, and chroma of 2.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -8
Zimmerman Soil Series (continued)
The Bw horizon has hue of 10YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 2 to 6. It has few to many, faint to
prominent redox features. The reddish brown Fe concentrations commonly are weakly cemented. Colors
with chromas of 2 or less occur as either the matrix or as Fe depletions above a depth of 40 inches. The
Bw horizon typically is fine sand, but sand, loamy fine sand or loamy sand in the upper part is within the
range. It is strongly acid or moderately acid.
The C horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 or 6, and chroma of 2 to 4. It has common or many
redox features. It is fine sand or sand. It is strongly acid to slightly acid.
COMPETING SERIES: These are the Aylmer, Hiwood, Meehan, Poppleton, Redby, Rushlake, and
Winterfield series. Aylmer, Poppleton, and Rushlake soils have pH greater than 6.0 in the series control
section. Hiwood, Poppleton, and Redby soils are substantially drier in the soil moisture control section
during the 120 days following the summer solstice. Hiwood soils also contain more than 5 percent coarse
and very coarse sand. Meehan and Rushlake soils have more than 5 percent coarse and very coarse sand
in the particle -size control section. Winterfield soils have an irregular decrease in organic matter with
increasing depth.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Lino soils have slightly concave to slightly convex slopes on glacial
outwash plains. Slopes range from 0 to 3 percent. They formed in sandy sediments of glacial outwash or
eolian origin. The deposits are of Late Wisconsinan Age. Mean annual air temperature ranges from 37 to
45 degrees F. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 24 to 33 inches. Frost -free days range from 90 to
150. Elevation above sea level ranges from 700 to 1400 feet.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the poorly and very poorly drained Isanti
soils, the excessively drained Zimmerman and Sartell soils, and the moderately well drained Friendship
soils which form a hydrosequence with the Lino soils. The poorly drained Blomford soils, the well
drained Anoka soils, and the somewhat poorly drained Soderville soils are also closely associated in some
places.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Somewhat poorly drained. Surface runoff is very low.
Permeability is rapid. An apparent water table is at 1.5 to 3.0 feet during November to June in most years.
USE AND VEGETATION: Approximately 50 percent of these soils are cropped to soybeans and corn.
The remaining areas are in pasture, forested pasture, or forest. Native vegetation was deciduous forest
with red and bur oak, aspen, and some water tolerant grasses being the dominant plants.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: East - central Minnesota and west - central Wisconsin.
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: St. Paul, Minnesota
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Isanti County, Minnesota, 1956.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are: ochric epipedon - the zone
from the surface to 7 inches (Ap horizon); udic moisture regime; aquic subgroup - low chroma redox
depletions above 1 meter.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -9
•
•
•
Rifle Soil Series
Official Soil Series Description
The Rifle series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils formed in organic deposits more than 51
inches thick in bogs and depressional areas within ground moraines, end moraines, outwash plains, and
lake plains. These soils have moderately rapid permeability. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. Mean
annual precipitation is about 30 inches and the mean annual temperature is about 42 degrees F.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Euic, frigid Typic Haplohemists
TYPICAL PEDON: Rifle mucky peat - undisturbed. (Colors are for moist soils.)
Oil - -0 to 2 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) broken face and rubbed peat, light yellowish brown
(10YR 6/4) pressed; 90 to 100 percent sphagnum moss rubbed; massive; neutral; clear smooth boundary.
0i2- -2 to 4 inches black (5YR 2/1) broken face, rubbed and pressed peat; about 90 percent fiber, 60
percent rubbed; massive; primarily sphagnum moss and some woody fragments; neutral; abrupt smooth
boundary.
Oel - -4 to 8 inches; black (5YR 2/1) broken face and rubbed mucky peat, dark reddish brown (5YR 2/2)
pressed; about 30 percent fiber and 10 percent rubbed; weak fine granular structure; woody and
herbaceous fibers; neutral; abrupt smooth boundary.
0e2 - -8 to 20 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 2/2) broken face, rubbed and pressed mucky peat; about
65 percent fiber and 20 percent rubbed; weak thick platy structure; primarily herbaceous fibers few
woody fragments; neutral; clear smooth boundary.
0e3 - -20 to 39 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 2/2) broken face and rubbed mucky peat, dark reddish
brown (5YR 3/3) pressed; about 80 percent fiber and 20 percent rubbed; weak thick platy structure;
primarily herbaceous fibers; neutral; gradual smooth boundary.
0e4 - -39 to 60 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 2/2) broken face, rubbed and pressed mucky peat; about
70 percent fiber, and 15 percent rubbed; weak thick platy structure; primarily herbaceous fibers; neutral.
TYPICAL LOCATION: Delta County, Michigan; about 4 miles northeast of the town of Bark River
1700 feet south and 350 feet west of the northeast corner, sec. 13, T. 39 N., R. 24 W.
RANGE OF CHARACTERISTICS: The thickness of the organic soil layers exceeds 51 inches. The
organic material is estimated to be primarily herbaceous fibers, however, some pedons contain less than
15 percent by volume of woody fragments that cannot be crushed between the fingers. The layers in the
subsurface tier typically have pH of 4.5 to 6.5 in O.O1M CaC12, but range from pH 5.6 to 7.3. The organic
soil materials lack free carbonates in all parts of the control section.
Some pedons contain surface layers composed of hemic or sapric material. The layers in the surface tier
are quite variable in color depending upon the stage of decomposition. Hue ranges from 10YR to 5YR,
value from 2 to 6, and chroma from 1 to 4. The fibers in these layers are primarily coarse granular or
weak thick platy structure or the layers in the subsurface and bottom tier have hue of 10YR, 7.5YR or
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -10
Rifle Soil Series (continued)
5YR, values of 2 to 5 and chroma of 1 to 5. Colors become darker upon brief exposure to air. Rubbed
colors have about the same range in the colors of broken faces, but in some pedons they differ by 0.5 to 1
unit in chroma or value or both. The lighter colors are generally those of materials that contain more fiber.
The layers in the subsurface and bottom tier are commonly massive, but in some pedons they have weak
thick platy structure. The materials are dominantly of hemic material. In some pedons, layers of fibric or
sapric materials are within the subsurface and bottom tier but total thickness of either material is less than
10 inches. Some pedons have limnic materials at depths of 51 inches or greater.
COMPETING SERIES: These are the Mooselake soils in the same family and the closely related
Carbondale, Carlisle, Greenwood and Houghton series. Mooselake soils have hemic material with mostly
woody fiber. Carbondale soils have sapric material dominant in the subsurface tier, and more than 10
inches of hemic material dominant in the subsurface and bottom tiers. Carlisle and Houghton soils have
sapric material dominant in the subsurface tier and are mesic.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Rifle soils are in bogs and depressional areas within ground moraines, end
moraines, outwash plains, and lake plains. Slope gradients are less than 2 percent. The mean annual
precipitation ranges from 19 to 35 inches and the mean annual temperature is about 40 to 46 degrees F.
The frost -free period is 90 to 150 days and the elevation ranges from 600 to 1,950 feet.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the Cathro, Lupton, Markey soils and
Carbondale soils. Cathro and Markey soils have loamy or sandy materials at depths of less than 51 inches.
Lupton soils formed in woody materials. The soils on nearby uplands are commonly acid and have coarse
and moderately coarse texture.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Very poorly drained. The seasonal high water table ranges from
1 foot above the surface to 1 foot below the surface from November to June. Surface runoff and internal
drainage is very slow; permeability is moderately rapid.
USE AND VEGETATION: These soils are primarily in woodland. A few areas are used for pasture.
Principal vegetation is tamarack, black spruce, paper birch, balsam fir, black ash, and northern white -
cedar. Ground cover is sphagnum moss, leather leaf, blueberry, and Labrador tea.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Wisconsin, and Washington. The
series is of large extent.
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: St. Paul, Minnesota
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Ogemaw County, Michigan, 1923.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and other features recognized in this pedon are: fibric material from the
surface to 4 inches (Oil and 0i2 horizons); hemic material from 8 to 60 inches (Oel, 0e2, 0e3 and 0e4
horizons); aquic soil moisture regime.
The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan B -11
•
•
•
Appendix C
Species Lists for Natural Community Restoration and Management
Sources: Dunevitz - Texler, H. and C. Lane, 2004.
Critical Connections Ecological Services, 1997 -2005
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -1
•
•
Dry Prairie Species List
Page 1 of 3
Understory Trees
Quercus ellipsoidalis Northern pin oak
Quercus __ _....._. macrocarpa Bur oak
Juniperus virginiana Red cedar
Shrubs
Salix humilis Prairie willow
Amelanchier spp. Juneberry
Rosa arkansana Prairie rose
Rhus glabra Smooth sumac
Prunus pumila Sand cherry
Prunus americana Wild plum
Low Shrubs
Amorpha canescens Lead -plant
Toxicodendron rydbergii Poison ivy
Forbs
Dalea
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ambrosia
Chrysopsis
Helianthemum
Helianthus
Lithospermum
Tradescantia
Solidago
Chenopodium
Achillea
Euphorbia
H edeoma
Lespedeza
Physalis
Lepidium
Penstemon
Physalis
Liatris
Euphorbia
Anemone
Solidago
Artemisia
Lygodesmia
Viola
Polygonella
Asclepias
Smilacinaa.._..
Anemone
Solidago ........_..
Cycloloma
villosa var. villosa Silky prairie-clover
................. ..............._.......___.._..
psilostachya Western ragweed
villosa var. villosa Prairie golden aster
bicknellii Hoary frostweed
paucorus var. paucijlorus Stiff sunflower
caroliniense ssp. croceum Hairy puccoon
occidentalis Western spiderwort
nemoralis Gray goldenrod
desiccatum Narrow- leaved lamb's quarters
millefolium Yarrow
geyeri Geyer's spurge
hispida .._.._ Mock pennyroyal
capitata Round- headed bush - clover
virginiana Ground - cherry
densWorum Green- flowered pepper - grass
grandorus Large- flowered beard tongue
heterophylla Clammy ground -cherry
aspera Rough blazing star
glyptosperma Ridge- seeded spurge
cylindrica Long- headed thimbleweed
missouriensis Missouri goldenrod
campestris Tall wormwood
juncea Skeleton -weed
pedatifida Prairie bird -foot violet
articulata Coast jointweed
viridora Green milkweed
stellata Starry false Solomon's-seal
patens var. multjda Pasque -flower
rigida Stiff goldenrod
atriplicifolium Winged pigweed
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -2
•
•
Dry Prairie Species List
Page 2 of 3
Ambrosia artemisiifolia Common ragweed
Liatris punctata Dotted blazing star
Froelichia floridana var. campestris Prairie cottonweed
Artemisia ludoviciana Western mugwort
Conyza canadensis Horseweed
Delphinium carolinianum Prairie larkspur
Gnaphalium obtusifolium Sweet everlasting
Geum tr florum Prairie smoke
Campanula rotundifolia Harebell
Oenothera clelandii Cleland's evening - primrose
Erigeron NN philadelphicus Philadelphia fleabane
Penstemon gracilis Slender beard - tongue
Polygala polygama var. obtusata Racemed milkwort
Dalea purpurea var. purpurea Purple prairie- clover
Oenothera biennis Common evening - primrose
Lepidium virginicum Virginia pepper -grass
Apocynum cannabinum American hemp
Antennaria spy. Pussytoes
Aster ericoides Heath aster
Scutellaria leonardi Leonard's skullcap
A_pocynum androsaemfolium Spreading dogbane
Aster oolentan 'ensts Sky-blue aster
Agastache foeniculum Blue giant- hyssop
Sisyrinchium campestre Field blue -eyed grass
Silene antirrhina Bleu catchfly_
Ascleptas tuberosa Butterfly -weed
Pogonum tenue Slender knotweed
Lithospermum incisum Narrow - leaved puccoon
Hieracium longipilum Long- bearded hawkweed
Grasses, Rushes and Sedges
Andropogon gerardii Big bluestem
Aristida basiramea Base - branched three -awn
Bouteloua hirsuta Hairy grama
Bouteloua curtipendula Side -oats grama
Calamovilfa ._. longifolia Sand reed -grass
Carex muhlenbergii Muhlenberg's sedge
Carex siccata Hay sedge
Carex umbellata Umbel sedge
Cenchrus longispinus Sandbur
Cyperus schweinitzii Schweinitz's cyperus
Cyperus lupulinus Hop-like cyperus
.......__ .. Cyperus spp. Cyperus
Eragrostis spectabilis Purple lovegrass
Koeleria pyramidata June -grass
Panicum commonsianum White -haired panic grass
Panicum perlongum Long-leaved panic grass
Panicum wilcoxianum Wilcox's panic grass
Panicum linearifolium Linear- leaved panic grass
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -3
•
•
Dry Prairie Species List
Page 3 of 3
Panicum
Panicum
Panicum
Panicum
virgatum
oligosanthes
lanuginosum
capillare mm
Switchgrass
Few - flowered panic grass
Hairy panic grass
Witch grass
Paspalum setaceum var. ciliatifolium Fringe -leaf paspalum
Schuachyrium scoparium Little bluestem
Setaria viridis Green foxtail
Sorghastrum nutans Indian grass
Sporobolus cryptandrus Sand dropseed
Stipa spartea Porcupine -grass
Ferns and Fern Allies
Selaginella
rupestris
Rock spikemoss
Exotic Invasive Species
Asparagus ..__._
Chenopodium
Crepis
Digitaria
Mollugo
Plantago
Poa
Poa
Polygonum
Salsola
Taraxacum
Tragopogon
- Do Not Plant
officinalis
album
tectorum
ischaemum
Asparagus
White lamb's quarters
Yellow hawk's -beard
Smooth crabgrass
verticillata Carpet -weed
patagonica Pursh's plantain
pratensis Kentucky bluegrass
compressa Canada bluegrass
convolvulus Black bindweed
tragus Russian thistle
spp __....__ Common dandelion
dubius Yellow goat's -beard
State Listed Rare Species - Do Not Plant Without a Permit
Aristida tuberculosa Sea -beach needle -grass
Hudsonia tomentosa False heather
Oenothera rhombipetala Rhombic evening- primrose
Triplasis purpurea Sand -grass
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -4
• Oak Forest Species List
•
•
Page 1 of 3
Canopy Trees ( >10m)
Acer rubrum
Acer negundo
Betula papyrifera
Carya cordiformis
Celtis occidentalis
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Ostrya virginiana
Prunus serotina
Quercus rubra____®
ercus alba
Tilia americana
Ulmus americana
Red maple
Box elder
Paper -birch
Bitternut hickory
Hackberry
Green ash
Ironwood
Black cherry
Northern red oak
White oak
Basswood
American elm
Understory Trees
Acer
Acer
Acer
Betula
Carpinus
Casa__
Celtis
negundo
saccharum
rubrum
pa ri era
caroliniana
cordiformis
occidentalis
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Fraxinus nigra
Os a vtrginiana
serotina
rubra
alba
americana
rubra N�ry
americana
Prunus
Quercus
uercus
Tilia
Ulmus
Ulmus
Box elder
Sugar maple
Red maple
Paper-birch
ssp. virginiana Blue beech
Bitternut hickory
Hackbeny ._.. .,,,.
Green ash
_..---------- -Black ash
Ironwood
Black cherry
Northern red oak
White oak
Basswood
Slipper elm
American elm
Shrubs
Corms alternifolia
Cornus racemosa
Corylus
Corylus
Prunus„
Ribes
Ribes
americana
cornuta
virginiana
gnosbati
missouriense
Rosa
Sambucus
Symphoricarpos
Viburnum
Viburnum
Viburnum
Zanthoxylum
blanda
Pagoda dogwood
Gray dogwood
American hazelnut
Beaked hazelnut
Chokecherry
Prickly gooseberry ___.
racemosa
ra nes uianum
lenta o
americanum
Missouri gooseberry
Smooth wild rose
Red - berried elder
Snowberry_________.
Down arrow -wood
Nannyberry
Prickly ash
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -5
• Oak Forest Species List
•
•
Page 2 of 3
Low Shrubs
Toxicodendron rydbergii
Rubus spp.
Rubus idaeus
var. strigosus
Poison ivy
Blackberry
Red raspberry
Vines
Parthenocissus spp.
Vitis riparia
Smilax hispida
Virginia creeper
Wild grape
Green -briar
Forbs
Actaea rubra
Amphicarpaea bracteata
Anemone americana
Apocynum androsaemifolium
Aquilegia canadensis
Aralia nudicaulis
Aralia racemosa
Arisaema triphyllum
Red baneberry
Hog -peanut
Round -lobed hepatica
Spreading dogbane
Columbine
Wild sarsaparilla
American spikenard
Jack -in- the - pulpit
Aster sagittifolius Tail- leaved aster
Caulophyllum thalictroides Blue cohosh
Circaea lutetiana ssp. canadensis Canada enchanter's nightshade
Cryptotaenia
Desmodium
Dioscorea
Erigeron
Eupatorium
Fragaria
Fragaria
Galium
Galium
Galium
Geranium
Geum
Hackelia virginiana
Hydrophyllum virginianum
...._ ................................................................................... ...............................
Impatiens spp.
Laportea canadensis
Lathyrus ochroleucus
Maianthemum canadense
diphylla
. . . . . . . . . . . .
unWora
canadensis
glutinosum
villosa
philadelphicus
rugosum
vesca
virginiana
aparine
triflorum
concinnum
maculatum
canadense
Mitella
Monotropa
Osmorhiza claytonii
Osmorhiza longistylis
Phryma leptostachya
Honewort
Pointed - leaved tick - trefoil
Wild yam
Philadelphia fleabane
Common snakeroot
ssp. americana Wood strawberry
Common strawberry
Cleavers
Three- flowered bedstraw
Elegant bedstraw
Wild geranium
White avens
Stickseed
Virginia waterleaf
_.___.__.__ .................. ...............................
Touch -me -not
Wood -nettle
Pale vetchling
Canada mayflower
Two - leaved miterwort
Indian pipe
Clayton's sweet cicely
Anise -root
Lopseed
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -6
• Oak Forest Species List
•
•
Page 2 of 4
Pilea spp. Clearweed
Polygonatum b j2orum Giant Solomon's -seal
Polygonatum pubescens Hairy Solomon's -seal
Ranunculus abortivus Kidney -leaf buttercup
Ranunculus recurvatus Hooked crowfoot
Sanguinaria canadensis Bloodroot
Sanicula marilandica Mari land black snakeroot
Sanicula gregaria Gregarious black snakeroot
Smilacina racemosa Racemose false Solomon's -seal
Smilax herbacea Carrion -flower
Stellaria longifolia Long - leaved chickweed
Thalictrum dioicum Early meadow -rue
Urtica dioica ssp. gracilis Stinging nettle
Uvularia grandora Yellow bellwort
Uvularia sessilifolia Pale bellwort
Veronicastrum virginicum Culver's root
Viola spp. _ .._. .. _..___._ ... ._..w._a_Violet,,..,,,.___,,,, ....._.m...
Grasses, Rushes and Sedges
Carex pensylvanica
Carex radiata
Carex blanda
Festuca „FTM subverticillata
Pennsylvania sedge
Stellate sedge
Charming sedge
Nodding fescue
Ferns and Fern Allies
Athyrium filix femina
Osmunda claytoniana
var. angustum
Lady -fern
Interrupted fern
Adiantum pedatum
Maidenhair fern
Pteridium aquilinum var. latiusculum Bracken fern
Botrychium
virginianum Rattlesnake fern
Exotic Invasive Species - Do Not Plant
Arctium minus Common burdock
Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Hone suckle
Prunella vulgaris Heal -all
Rhamnus cathartica Common buckthorn
Taraxacum spp. Common dandelion
State Listed Rare Species - Do Not Plant Without a Permit
Juglans cinerea Butternut SC
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -7
• Wet Meadow Species List
Page 1 of 4
Understory Trees
Acer negundo Box elder
Betula papyrifera Paper -birch
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash
Larix laricina Tamarack
Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen
Ulmus americana American elm
Ulmus rubra Slippery elm
Shrubs
Alnus incana ssp. rugosa Speckled alder
Betula pumila Bog -birch
Cornus sericea Red -osier dogwood
Cornus amomum ssp. obliqua Silky dogwood
Ilex verticillata Winterberry
Salix petiolaris Slender willow
Salix pedicellaris var. pedicellaris Bog willow
Salix exigua ssp. interior Sandbar willow
Salix eriocephala Heart- leaved willow
Salix discolor Pussy willow
Salix candida Sage- leaved willow
Salix bebbiana Bebb's willow
Spiraea tomentosa var. rosea Steeple -bush
Spiraea alba Meadowsweet
Forbs
Acorus calamus Sweet flag
Alisma triviale Ordinary water- plantain
Anemone canadensis Canada anemone
Apios americana Groundnut
Apocynum sibiricum Clasping dogbane
Asclepias incarnata Swamp milkweed
Aster firmus Red- stemmed aster
Aster lanceolatus Panicled aster
Aster umbellatus Flat- topped aster
Aster borealis Bog aster
Bidens spp. Beggar -ticks
Boehmeria cylindrica False nettle
Calla palustris Wild calla
Caltha palustris . marsh - margold
Campanula aparinoides Marsh bellflower
Chelone glabra White turtlehead
Cicuta bulbifera Bulb- bearing water - hemlock
Cicuta maculata Spotted water - hemlock
Cirsium muticum Swamp thistle
Conyza canadensis Horseweed
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -8
Wet Meadow Species List
Page 2 of 4
Echinocystis lobata
Epilobium spp.
Erechtites hieracifolia
Erigeron philadelphicus
Eriocaulon aquaticum
Eupatorium maculatum
Eupatorium perfoliatum
Fragaria virginiana
Galium trifidum
Galium tinctorium
................................................................................................ ...............................
Galium labradoricum
Gentiana billingtonii
Wild cucumber
Willow -herb
Pilewort
Philadelphia fleabane
Pipewort
Spotted Joe -pye weed
Common boneset
Common strawberry
Three -cleft bedstraw
Small bedstraw
Marsh bedstraw
Closed gentian
Geum aleppicum var. strictum Yellow avens
Habenaria psycodes Small purple fringed- orchid
Helenium autumnale Autumn sneezeweed
Helianthus giganteus
Hypericum majus
Impatiens spp.
Iris versicolor
Lathyrus palustris
Lemna spp.
Lycopus
Lycopus
Lycopus
Lysimachia
Lysimachia
Mentha
uniorus
americanus
asper
thyrsifiora
...................
terrestris
arvensis
Nuphar
Pedicularis
Pilea
Polygonum
Polygonum
Polygonum
Polygonum ... .
Polygonum ..
Potentilla
Potentilla
Pycnanthemum
Ranunculus
Rubus
Rumex
Sagittaria
Sax (raga
Scutellaria
Scutellaria
Sium
Smilacina
Solidago
Solidago
Sparganium
luteum
lanceolata
spp.
amphibium
sagittatum
Giant sunflower
Large St. John's -wort
Touch -me -not
Northern blue Flag
Marsh vetchling.__-- _- --___.
Lesser duckweed
Northern bugleweed
Cut - leaved bugleweed
Rough bugle -weed
Tufted loosestrife
Yellow loosestrife
var. glabrata Common mint
Yellow pond -lily
Swamp lousewort
Clearweed
var. stipulaceum Water smartweed
Arrow- leaved tearthumb
Dotted smartweed
Nodding smartweed
Mild water - pepper
Marsh cinquefoil
Rough cinquefoil
Virginia mountain mint
Bristly buttercup
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dwarf raspberry
Great water dock
Broad - leaved arrowhead
Swamp saxifrage
Marsh skullcap
Mad -dog skullcap
Water - parsnip
Starry false Solomon's -seal
Canada goldenrod
Giant goldenrod _ mm
Giant bur -reed
punctatum
lapathifolium
hydropiperoides
palustrisv...
norvegica ® _
virginianum
pensylvanicus
............................................................. .............._................
pubescens
orbiculatus��
latifolia
pensylvanica .._.__
galericulata
lateriora
suave
stellata
canadensis
gigantea
eurycarpum
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -9
•
•
Wet Meadow Species List
Page 3 of 4
Stachys palustris Woundwort
Stellaria longifolia Long - leaved chickweed
Teucrium canadense
Thalictrum dasycarpum
Triadenum fraseri Marsh St. John's-wort
Typha spp. Cattail
Urtica dioica ssp. gracilis Stinging nettle
Verbena hastata Blue vervain
Veronica scutellata Marsh speedwell
Viola spp. Violets
Viola renifolia Kidney -leaf violet
Germander
Tall meadow -rue
Grasses, Rushes a nd Sedges
Agrostis hyemalis
Bromus ciliatus
Calamagrostis
Carex
Carex
Carex
Carex
Carex
canadensis
aquatilis
bebbii
buxbaumii
cephalantha
diandra
Carex haydenii
Carex interior
Carex lacustris
Carex lasiocarpa
....................................._..._.......................................... ..........................._...
Carex pellita
Carex..._,__.,__,._.__... prairea
Carex
Carex scoparia
Carex stipata
Carex stricta
Carex tribuloides
Carex utriculata
Carex vesicaria
Dulichium arundinaceum
Eleocharis compressa
Eriophorum angustifolium
Glyceria canadensis
Glyceria grandis
Glyceria striata
Juncus canadensis
Leersia oryzoides
sartwellii
Leersia virginica
Muhlenbergia racemosa
Phragmites australis
var. scabra
Rough bent -grass
Fringed brome
Bluejoint _.._._......_. ,.
Water sedge
Bebb's sedge
Buxbaum s sedge
Bunched sedge
Lesser-panicled sedge
Hayden's sedge
Inland sedge
Lake -sedge
var. americana Wire -sedge ....._
Woolly sedge
Prairie sedge
Sartwell's sedge
Pointed -broom sedge
Awl- fruited sedge
Tusssock -sedge
Blunt -broom sedge
Beaked sedge
Inflated sedge
Three -way sedge____________
Flattened spike -rush
Narrow- leaved cotton -grass
Rattlesnake grass
Tall manna -grass
Fowl manna -grass
Canada rush
Rice cut grass
White .�.�._ -_.
Marsh muhly grass
Common reed
Poa palustris Fowl meadow -grass
Scirpus acutus Hard - stemmed bulrush
Scirpus atrovirens Dark green bulrush
Scirpus cyperinus Wool grass
Scirpus pungens .._.._. Three -square
Scirpus validus var. creber Softstem bulsush
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -10
•
Spartina pectinata Prairie cord -grass
Wet Meadow Species List
Page 4 of 4
Ferns and Fern Allies
Equisetum fluviatile Water horsetail
Equisetum arvense Field horsetail
Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive fern
Thelypteris palustris Northern marsh -fern
Exotic Invasive Species - Do Not Plant
Cirsium arvense Canada thistle
Cirsium vulgare Bull thistle
Crepis tectorum Yellow hawk's -beard
Leonurus Lion's ear
Lythrum salicaria var. tomentosum Purple loosestrife
Phalaris arundtnacea Reed canary- grass
Poa Wpratensis Kentucky bluegrass
Polygonum convolvulus Black bindweed
Rumex crispus Curly dock
Ulmus pumila Siberian elm
State Listed Rare Species - Do Not Plant Without a Permit
Viola lanceolata
Lance leaved violet
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -11
•
•
Mixed Emergent Marsh Species List
Page 1 of 3
Understory Trees
Populus tremuloides
Quaking aspen
Shrubs
Amorpha fruticosa False indigo
Forbs
Acorus calamus Sweet flag
Alisma triviale Ordinary water - plantain
Alisma subcordatum Heart- leaved water - plantain
Aster lanceolatus Panicled aster
Bidens spp. Beggar -ticks
Boehmeria cylindrica False nettle
Campanula aparinoides Marsh bellflower
Cicuta maculata Spotted water - hemlock
Cicuta bulbifera Bulb - bearing water- hemlock
Cuscuta spp. Dodder
Epilobium spp. Willow -herb
Eriocaulon aquaticum Pipewort
Eupatorium perfoliatum Common boneset
Eupatorium purpureum Sweet Joe -pye weed
Eupatorium maculatum Spotted Joe -pye weed
Euthamia graminifolia Grass- leaved goldenrod
Galium tinctorium Small bedstraw
Galium labradoricum Marsh bedstraw
Galium tridum Three -cleft bedstraw
Hypericummm magus Large St. John's -wort
Impatiens spp. Spotted touch -me -not
Iris versicolor Northern blue Flag
Lemna spp. Lesser duckweed
Ludwigia palustris Common water primrose
Lycopus unii torus Northern bugleweed
Lycopus americanus Cut - leaved bugleweed
Lycopus asper Rough bugleweed
Lysimachia mm thyrsora Tufted loosestrife
Lysimachia ciliata Fringed loosestrife
Lysimachia terrestris Yellow loosestrife
Mentha arvensis var. glabrata Common mint
Mimulus ringens Purple monkey -flower
Nuphar luteum Yellow pond -lily
Nymphaea spp. Waterlily
Physostegia virginiana Obedient plant
Pilea spp. Clearweed
Polygonum amphibium Swamp smartweed
Polygonum punctatum Dotted smartweed
Polygonum pensylvanicum Pennsylvania smartweed
Polygonum amphibium var. stipulaceum Water smartweed
Polygonum lapathifolium Nodding smartweed
Potentilla norvegica Rough cinquefoil
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -12
•
Mixed Emergent Marsh Species List
Page 2 of 3
Ranunculus
Ranunculus
Rorippa
Rumex
Sagittaria
Sagittaria
Scutellaria
Scutellaria
Sium
Sparganium
p ganium
Sparganium
Spirodela
Triadenum
Types
Verbena
pensylvanicus Bristly buttercup
hispidus Hispid buttercup
palustris Icelandic yellow cress
maritimus var. fueginus.._ Golden dock
latifolia
rigida
galericulata
laterWora
suave
eurycarpum
androcladum
emersum
polyrhiza
fraseri
spp.
hastata
Broad - leaved arrowhead
Sessile - fruited arrowhead
Marsh skullcap
Mad -dog skullcap
Water-parsnip
Giant bur -reed
Branching bur reed
Unbranched bur reed
Greater duckweed
Marsh St. John's -wort
Cattail
Blue vervain
Grasses, Rushes and Sedges
Agrostis hyemalis
Calamagrostis canadensis
Calamagrostis '° °...._. stricta
Carex comosa
Carex scoparia
var. scabra
Carex diandra
Cyperus odoratus
Cyperus ....._. diandrus
Cyperus erythrorhizos
Cyperus strigosus
Dulichium arundinaceum
Echinochloa muricata
Eleocharis acicularis
Eleocharis elliptica
Eleocharis ovata
Glyceria borealis
Glyceria grandis
Juncus canadensis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Juncus brevicaudatus
Juncus effusus
Juncus nodosus
Leersia oryzoides
Phragmites australis
Scirpus fluviatilis
Scirpus validus
Scirpus smithii
Scirpus acutus
Scirpus atrovirens
Scirpus cyperinus
Spartina pectinata
Zizania palustris
var. creber
Rough bent -grass
Bluejoint
Bog reed -grass
Bristly sedge
Pointed -broom sedge
Lesser - panicled sedge
Fragrant cyperus
Sedge galingale
Red - rooted cyperus
Straw - colored umbrella sedge
Three -way sedge
Rough barnyard grass
Least spikerush
Elliptic spikerush
Ovoid spikerush
Northern manna grass
Tall manna -grass
Canada rush
Narrow - panicled rush
Soft rush
Knotty rush
Rice cut grass
Common reed
River bulrush
Softstem bulrush
Pursh's bulrush
Hard- stemmed bulrush
Dark green bulrush
Wool -grass
Prairie cord -grass
Wild rice
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -13
• Mixed Emergent Marsh Species List
•
Page 3 of 3
Exotic Invasive Species - Do Not Plant
Echinochloa crusgalli Cockspur barnyard grass
Lythrum salicaria var. tomentosum Purple loosestrife
Phalaris arundinacea Reed canary-grass
Rumex crispus Curly dock
State Listed Rare Species - Do Not Plant Without a Permit
None
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -14
•
Dry Barrens Oak Savanna Species List
Page 1 of 4
Canopy Trees ( >10 m)
Quercus ellipsoidalis Northern pin oak
Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak
Understory Trees
Juniperus virginiana Red cedar
Pinus banksiana Jack pine
Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen
Prunus serotina Black cherry
Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak
Quercus ellipsoidalis Northern pin oak
Shrubs
Amelanchier spp. Juneberry
Amelanchier laevis Smooth juneberry
Cornus sericea Red -osier dogwood
Coiylus americana American hazelnut
Prunus virginiana Chokecherry
Prunus pumila Sand cherry
Prunus americana Wild plum
Rhus glabra Smooth sumac
Rosa arkansana Prairie rose
Salix humilis Prairie willow
Zanthoxylum americanum Prickly ash
Low Shrubs
Amorpha canescens Lead -plant
Artemisia frigida Prairie sagewort
Rubus idaeus var. strigosus Red raspberry
Toxicodendron rydbergii Poison ivy
Vines
Parthenocissus spp. Virginia creeper
Vitis riparia Wild grape
Forbs
Achillea millefolium Yarrow
Ambrosia psilostachya Western ragweed
Amphicarpaea bracteata Hog - peanut
Anemone cylindrica Long - headed thimbleweed
Antennaria spp. Pussytoes
Arabis divaricarpa Spreading rock -cress
Artemisia ludoviciana Western mugwort
Artemisia campestris Tall wormwood
Artemisia dracunculus Tarragon
Asclepias syriaca Common milkweed
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -15
• Dry Barrens Oak Savanna Species List
•
•
Page 2 of 4
Asclepias
Asclepias
tuberosa
viridiflora
Asclepias oval:folia
Aster ericoides
Aster oolentangiensis
Cerastium arvense
Chenopodium desiccatum
Chrysopsis villosa
Cirsium discolor
Comandra umbellata
Conyza .. ____.. canadensis
Coreopsis
Dalea
Dalea
Erigeron
Erigeron
Butterfly-weed
Green milkweed
Oval- leaved milkweed
Heath aster
Sky -blue aster
Field chickweed
Narrow- leaved lamb's quarters
var. villosa Prairie golden aster
Field thistle
Bastard toad -flax
Horseweed
Stiff tickseed
villosa Silky prairie- clover
var. purpurea Purple prairie- clover
Daisy fleabane
Annual fleabane
Ridge - seeded spurge
Geyer's spurge
Grass- leaved goldenrod
Common strawberry
var. campestris Prairie cottonweed
�_... Prairie smoke
Sweet everlasting
Mock pennyroyal
Hoary frostweed
var. pauciflorus Stiff sunflower
var. intonsus Veiny pea
Prairie pinweed
Green- flowered pepper -grass
Round - headed bush clover
Rough blazing star
Blue toadflax
Grooved yellow flax
ssp. croceum Hairy puccoon
Hoary puccoon
Ham four-o'clock
Common evening - primrose
Large- flowered beard- tongue
Slender beard- tongue
ssp. fulgida Prairie phlox
Ground -cherry
Clammy ground -cherry
Pursh's plantain
var. obtusata Racemed milkwort
Giant Solomon's -seal
Coast jointweed
Slender knotweed
Tall cinquefoil
Prairie buttercup
palmata
" - villosa var.
purpurea
strigosus
annuus
Euphorbia glyptosperma
Euphorbia geyeri
Euthamia graminifolia
Fragaria virginiana
Froelichia floridana
Geum trorum
Gnaphalium^
Hedeoma
Helianthemum
Helianthus
Lathyrus
Lechea
obtusifolium
hispida
bicknellii
pauciflorus
venosus
stricta
Lepidium ...... ....... denstflorum
Lespedeza capitata
Liatris ".__...._- aspera
Linaria canadensis
Linum sulcatum
Lithospermum caroliniense
Lithospermum canescens
Mirabilis hirsuta
Oenothera biennis
Penstemon_.._. grandiflorus
Penstemon gracilis
Phlox pilosa
Physalis virginiana
Physalis heterophylla
Plantago patagonica
Polygala polygama
Polygonatum ...biflorum
Polygonella articulata
Polygonum tenue
Potentilla arguta
Ranunculus rhomboideus
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -16
• Dry Barrens Oak Savanna Species List
Page 3 of 4
Rudbeckia hirta var. pulcherrima Black -eyed Susan
Rumex acetosella Red sorrel
Scutellaria leonardii Leonard's skullcap
Silene antirrhina Sleepy catchfly
Sisyrinchium campestre
Smilacina stellata
_...
Smilax spp.
Solidago nemoralis
Solidago missouriensis
Solidago speciosa
Solidago rigida
Solidago gigantea
Tradescantia occidentalis
Viola pedatifida
Field blue-eyed grass
Starry false Solomon's -seal
Carrion -flower
Gray goldenrod
Missouri goldenrod
Showy goldenrod
Stiff goldenrod
Giant goldenrod
Western spiderwort
Prairie bird -foot violet
Grasses, Rushes and Sedges
Agrostis hyemalis
Andropogon gerardii
Aristida basiramea
Bouteloua curtipendula
Bouteloua hirsuta
Calamovilfa longifolia
Carex umbellata
.................
Carex pensylvanica
Carex pensylvanica
Carex _ muhlenbergii
Carex siccata
Cenchrus longispinus
Cyperus ryMm schweinitzii
Cyperus lupulinus
Eragrostis spectabilis
Koeleria pyramidata
Leptoloma cognatum
Panicum capillare
Panicum commonsianum
Panicum virgatum
Panicum perlongum
Panicum linearifolium
Panicum lanuginosum
Panicum oligosanthes
Paspalum setaceum
Schizachyrium scoparium
Sorghastrum nutans _..__. ,....._
Sporobolus cryptandrus
Sporobolus heterolepis
Stipa spartea
Vulpia octoflora
var. scabra Rough bent -grass
Big bluestem
Base - branched three awn
Side -oats grama
Hairy grams
Sand reed -grass
Umbel sedge
var. digyna Sunshine sedge^^^
Pennsylvania sedge
Muhlenberg's sedge
Hay sedge
Sandbar
Schweinitz's cyperus .......___,
Hop -like cyperus
Purple lovegrass
June -grass
Fall witch grass
.__....__Witch grass
Witch
panic grass
Switchgrass
Long- leaved panic grass
Linear- leaved panic grass
Hairy panic grass
Few - flowered panic grass
Hairy beadgrass
Little bluestem
var. glauca
Indian grass
Sand dropseed
Prairie dropseed
Porcupine -grass
Eight -week fescue
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -17
Dry Barrens Oak Savanna Species List
Page 4 of 4
Ferns and Fern Allies
Botrychium multfdum
Equisetum
Equisetum
Selaginella
hyemale
laevigatum
rupestris
var. affine
Leathery grapefem
Tall scouring -rush
Smooth scouring -rush
Rock spikemoss
Exotic Invasive Species - Do Not Plant
Asparagus officinalis Asparagus
Berteroa incana Hoary alyssum
Bromus tectorum Cheatgrass
Bromus inermis Smooth brome
Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle
Mollugo verticillata Carpet -weed
Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass
Poa compresses Canada bluegrass
Potentilla argentea Silvery cinquefoil
Rhamnus cathartica Common buckthorn
Tragopogon dubius Yellow goat's -beard
State Listed Rare Species - Do Not Plant Without a Permit
Aristida tuberculosa Sea -beach needle -grass
SC
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -18
Mesic Prairie Species List
Page l of 5
Understory Trees
Acer negundo Box elder
Juniperus virginiana Red cedar
Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen
Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak
Quercus ellipsoidalis Northern pin oak
Tilia americana Basswood
Ulmus rubra Slippery elm
Cornus racemosa Gray dogwood
Cornus sericea Red -osier dogwood
Corylus americana American hazelnut
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prunus americana Wild plum
Prunus virginiana Chokecherry
Prunus pumila Sand cherry
Rhus glabra Smooth sumac
Rhus typhina Staghorn sumac
Rosa arkansana Prairie rose
Rosa spp. Smooth wild rose
Salix humilis Prairie willow
Spiraea alba Meadowsweet
Symphoricarpos spp. Snowberry
Low Shrubs
Amorpha canescens Lead -plant
Amorpha nano Fragrant false indigo
Artemisia frigida Prairie sagewort
Rubus idaeus var. strigosus Red raspberry
Rubus occidentalis Black raspberry
Toxicodendron rydbergii Poison ivy
Vines
Clematis virginiana Virgin's bower
Parthenocissus spp. Virginia creeper
Vitis riparia Wild grape
Forbs
Achillea millefolium Yarrow
Allium stellatum Prairie wild onion
Allium canadense Wild garlic
Ambrosia psilostachya Western ragweed
Ambrosia artemisiifolia Common ragweed
Anemone cylindrica Long - headed thimbleweed
Anemone virginiana Virginia thimbleweed
Anemone canadensis Canada anemone
Antennaria spp. Pussytoes
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -19
Mesic Prairie Species List
Page 2 of 5
Apocynum androsaemifolium Spreading dogbane
Apocynum sibiricum Clasping dogbane
Artemisia ludoviciana Western mugwort
Artemisia dracunculus Estragon
Artemisia campestris Tall wormwood
Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly -weed
Asclepias syriaca Common milkweed
Asclepias ovalifolia Oval- leaved milkweed
Aster oolentangiensis Sky-blue aster
Aster ericoides Heath aster
Aster lanceolatus Panicled aster
Aster novae- angliae New England aster
Aster laevis Smooth aster
Astragalus agrestis Field milk -vetch
Astragalus canadensis Canada milk -vetch
Campanula rotundifolia Harebell
Chrysopsis villosa var. villosa Prairie golden aster
Cirsium discolor Field thistle
Cirsium muticum Swamp thistle
Cirsium flodmani Prairie thistle
Comandra umbellata Bastard toad -flax
Conyza canadensis Horseweed
Coreopsis palmata Stiff tickseed
Cuscuta spp. Dodder
Dalea purpurea Purple prairie- clover
Dalea candida White prairie- clover
Desmodium canadense Canadian tick- trefoil
Erigeron strigosus Daisy fleabane
Euphorbia corollata Flowering spurge
Euthamia graminifolia Grass- leaved goldenrod
Fragaria virginiana Common strawberry
Galium boreale ssp. septentrionale Northern bedstraw
Galium trorum Three- flowered bedstraw
Gentiana billingtonii Closed gentian
Geum trorum Prairie smoke
Glycyrrhiza lepidota Wild licorice
Hedeoma hispida Mock pennyroyal..
Helenium autumnale Autumn sneezeweed
Helianthus maximiliani Maximilian 's sunflower
Helianthus paucorus var. paucorus Stiff sunflower
Helianthus giganteus Giant sunflower
Heliopsis helianthoides ssp. occidentalis Ox -eye
Heuchera richardsonii Alum-root
hirsuta Yellow star -grass
Krigia biora Two- flowered Cynthia
Kuhnia eupatorioides var. corymbulosa False boneset
Lactuca........................ .._....................SPP..... _... __._..._........ ...........................Wild lettuce..................................... ...............................
.._
Lathyrus palustris Marsh vetchling
Lathyrus venosus var. intonsus Veiny pea
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -20
• Mesic Prairie Species List
•
Page 3 of 5
Lespedeza
Liatris
Liatris
Liatris
Lilium W�
Lithospermum
Lithospermum
Lobelia
Mirabilis
Monarda
Oenothera
Oxalis
Pedicularis
Pediomelum
Phlox
Physalis
Physalis
Polygala
Polygala
Polygonatum
Potentilla
Potentilla
capitata
aspera
hgulistylis
pycnostachya
philadelphicum var. andinum
canescens
caroliniense ssp. croceum
spicata
hirsuta
fistulosa
biennis
spp
canadensis
argophyllum
pilosa ssp. fulgida
heterophylla
virginiana
sanguinea
polygama
b fflorum
simplex
arguta
Prenanthes racemosa
Pycnanthemum virginianum
Ratibida pinnata
Round- headed bush - clover
Rough blazing star
Northern plains blazing star
Gayfeather
Wood lily
Hoary puccoon
puccoon
Rough - spiked Lobelia
Hairy four- o'clock
...........
Wild bergamot
Common evening - primrose
Wood - sorrel
Wood - betony
Silvery scurf -pea
Prairie phlox
var. obtusata
Clammy ground -cherry
Ground-cherry
milkwort
Racemed milkwort
Giant Solomon's -seal
Old -field cinquefoil
Tall cinquefoil
Smooth r attlesnake -root
Virginia mountain -mint
Gray - headed coneflower
Rudbeckia hirta var. pulcherrima
Scutellaria leonardi
Silphium perfoliatum
Sisyrinchium
Smilacina
Smilacina
campestre
stellata
racemosa
Solidago rigida
Solidago canadensis
Solidago gigantea
Solidago nemoralis
Solidago
Solidago
Solidago
Stachys
Thalictrum
Tradescantia
Vernonia fasciculata
Veronicastrum virginicum
Vicia americana
Viola
Viola
Viola
Viola
Zizia
Zizia
mzssourtensts
ptarmicoides
speciosa
palustris
dasycarpum
bracteata
pedatfda
sagittata
pedata ..._.
spp.
aptera
aurea
Black -eyed Susan
Leonard's skullcap
Cup -plant
Field blue -eyed grass
Starry false Solomon's -seal
Racemose false Solomon's -seal
Stiff goldenrod
Canada goldenrod
Giant goldenrod
Gray goldenrod
Missouri goldenrod
Upland white aster
Showy goldenrod
Woundwort
Tall meadow -rue
Bracted spiderwort
Bunched ironweed
Culver's root
American vetch
Prairie bird -foot violet
Arrow- leaved violet
Bird -foot violet
Violet
Heart- leaved alexanders
Golden alexanders
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -21
• Mesic Prairie Species List
•
•
Page4of5
Grasses, Rushes and Sedges
Andropogon gerardii Big bluestem
Bromus kalmii Kahn's brome
Carex bicknellii Bicknell's sedge
Carex muhlenbergai Muhlenberg's sedge
Carex meadii Mead's sedge
Carex tenera Marsh -straw sedge
Carex scoparia Pointed -broom sedge
Carex siccata Hay sedge
Elymus wiegandii Canada wild rye
Elymus trachycaulus Slender wheatgrass
Eragrostis spectabilis Purple lovegrass
Juncus green: Greene's rush
Koeleria pyramidata June -grass
Muhlenbergia mexicana Mexican satin -grass
Muhlenbergia glomerata Clustered muhly grass
Muhlenbergia~_m_ frondosa Swamp satin -grass
Muhlenbergia racemosa Marsh muhly grass
Panicum oligosanthes Few- flowered panic grass
Panicum leibergii Leiberg' s _panic Pass
Panicum virgatum Switchgrass
Panicum perlongum Long - leaved panic grass
Panicum commonsianum White- haired panic grass
Panicum capillare Witch grass
Schizachyrium scoparium Little bluestem
Sorghastrum nutans Indian grass
Spartina pectinata Prairie cord -grass
Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie dropseed
Stipa .__ spartea Porcupine -grass
Ferns and Fern Allies
Equisetum laevigatum Smooth scouring -rush
Equisetum hyemale var. affine Tall scouring -rush
Equisetum ~ __ ~~ arvense m Field horsetail
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -22
• Mesic Prairie Species List
•
Page 5 of 5
Exotic Invasive Species - Do Not Plant
Asparagus officinalis Asparagus
Bromus inermis Smooth brome
Cirsium arvense Canada thistle
Elytrigia repens Quack grass
Hieracium kalmii Hawkweed
Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle
Melilotus spp. Sweet clover
Phalaris arundinacea Reed canary-grass
Phleum pratense Cultivated timothy
Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass
Poa compressa Canada bluegrass
Polygonum convolvulus Black bindweed
Prunella vulgaris _._ Heal -all _._..._
Rhamnus cathartica Common buckthorn
Setaria glauca Yellow foxtail
Taraxacum spp. Common dandelion
Tragopogon dubius Yellow goat's-beard
Trifolium pratense Red clover
Vicia angustifolia Narrow- leaved vetch
State Listed Rare Species - Do Not Plant Without a Permit
Eryngium yuccifolium Rattlesnake -master
SC
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -23
Aspen Woodland Species List
Page 1 of 3
Canopy Trees ( >10 m)
Acer rubrum Red maple
Betula papyrifera Paper -birch
Pinus __.._....__. "__ strobus White pine
Populus grandidentata Big - toothed aspen
Quercus ellipsoidalis Northern pin oak
Quercus rubra Northern red oak
Quercus alba White oak
Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak
Understory Trees
Acer rubrum Red maple
Betula papyrifera Paper -birch
Carpinus caroliniana ssp. virginiana Blue beech
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash
Ostrya virginiana Ironwood
Pinus strobus White pine
Populus tremuloides Quaking aspen
Prunus serotina Black cherry
Quercus alba White oak
Quercus rubra Northern red oak
Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak
Quercus ellipsoidalis Northern pin oak
Shrubs
Amelanchier spp. Juneberry
Amelanchier laevis Smooth juneber y
Cornus racemosa Gray dogwood
Cornus alternifolia Pagoda dogwood
Corylus americana American hazelnut
Corylus cornuta Beaked hazelnut
Diervilla lonicera Bush honeysuckle
Ilex verticillata Winterberry
Juniperus communis var. depressa Bush juniper
Lonicera dioica Wild Honeysuckle
Prunus virginiana Chokecherry
Prunus pensylvanica Pin cherry
Rosa blanda Smooth wild rose
Zanthoxylum americanum Prickly ash
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -24
110 Aspen Woodland Species List
•
Page 2 of 3
Low Shrubs
Amorpha
Gaultheria
Rubus
Rubus
Rubus
Toxicodendron
canescens
procumbens
spp
occidentalis
idaeus
rydbergii
Lead -plant
var. strigosus
Vaccinium
Vaccinium
Vitis
angustifolium
myrtilloides
riparia
Wintergreen
Blackberry
Black raspberry
Red raspberry
Poison ivy
Lowbush blueberry
Velvet -leaf blueberry
Wild grape
Vines
Parthenocissus spp.
Virginia creeper
Forbs
Amphicarpaea bracteata
Apocynum androsaemifolium
Aquilegia canadensis
Aralia nudicaulis
Arenaria laterjora
Asclepias ovalifolia
Aster
Aster
Aster
Circaea
macrophyllus
ciliolatus
oolentangiensis
lutetiana
Fragaria virginiana
Galium boreale
Galium ._.._, triflorum
Geranium maculatum
Hackelia
Lathyrus
Lathyrus venosus
Maianthemum canadense
Hog - peanut
Spreading dogbane
Columbine
Wild sarsaparilla
Side - flowering sandwort
Oval - leaved milkweed
Large - leaved aster
Lindley's aster
Sky -blue aster
ssp. canadensis Canada enchanter's nightshade
Common strawberry
ssp. septentrionale Northern bedstraw
Three- flowered bedstraw
Wild geranium
spp.
ochroleucus
Mitchella repens
Stickseed
Pale vetchling
var. intonsus
Veiny pea
Canada mayflower
Smilacina racemosa
Solidago hispida
Urtica dioica
ssp. gracilis
Partridge -berry
Racemose false Solomon's -seal
Hairy goldenrod
Stinging nettle
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -25
• Aspen Woodland Species List
•
•
Page 3 of 3
Grasses, Rushes and Sedges
Bromus ciliatus Fringed brome
Carex pensylvanica Pennsylvania sedge
Elymus diversiglumis Interrupted wild rye
Oryzopsis asperifolia Moutain rice -grass
Ferns and Fern Allies
Equisetum hyemale var. affine Tall scouring rush
Pteridium aquilinum var. latiusculum Bracken fern
Onoclea Sensibilis Sensitive fern
Exotic Invasive Species - Do Not
Plant
Chenopodium album White lamb's quarters
Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass
Rhamnus frangula Alder buckthorn
Taraxacum spp. Common dandelion
State Listed Rare Species - Do Not Plant Without a Permit
None
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -26
Lowland Hardwood Forest Species List
Page 1 of 3
Canopy Trees ( >10 m)
Acer saccharinum Silver maple
Acer negundo Box elder
Celtis occidentalis Hackberry
Fraxinus nigra Black ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash
Populus deltoides ssp. monilifera Cottonwood
Salix nigra Black willow
Tilia americana Basswood
Ulmus rubra Slippery elm
Ulmus americana American elm
Understory Trees
Acer negundo Box elder
Acer saccharinum Silver maple
Acer saccharum Sugar maple
Carya cordiformis Bittemut hickory
Celtis occidentalis Hackberry
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash
Fraxinus nigra Black ash
Ostrya virginiana Ironwood
Tilia americana Basswood
Ulmus americana American elm
Ulmus rubra Slippery elm
Shrubs
Cornus amomum ssp. obliqua Silky dogwood
Euonymus atropurpureus Wahoo
Prunus virginiana Chokecherry
Ribes missouriense Missouri gooseberry
Ribes americanum Wild black currant
Ribes cynosbati Prickly gooseberry
Sambucus canadensis Common elder
Sambucus racemosa Red- berried elder
Viburnum lentago Nannyberry
Zanthoxylum americanum Prickly ash
Low Shrubs
Toxicodendron rydbergii Poison ivy
Vines
Menispermum canadense Canada moonseed
Parthenocissus spp. Virginia creeper
Smilax hispida Green- briar.. _.._.__..
Vitis riparia Wild grape
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -27
Lowland Hardwood Forest Species List
Page 2 of 3
Forbs
Allium
Anemone
Arisaema
Aster
Aster
Aster
Boehmeria cylindrica
Campanula americana
Caulophyllum thalictroides
Circaea lutetiana
Circaea alpina
Cryptotaenia canadensis
tricoccum
quinquefolia
triphyllum
pubentior
ontarionis
cordifolius
Cuscuta spp.
Dicentra cucullaria
Enemion biternatum
Erythronium albidum
Galium aparine
Galium tr forum
Geranium maculatum
var. bifolia
Wild leek
Wood - anemone
Jack -in- the - pulpit
Flat - topped aster
Ontario aster
Heart- leaved aster
False nettle
Tall bellflower
Blue cohosh
ssp. canadensis Canada enchanter's nightshade
Small enchanter's nightshade
Honewort
Geum canadense
Hackelia spp.
Hydrophyllum virginianum
Impatiens spp.
Laportea canadensis
Lilium michiganense
Maianthemum canadense
Osmorhiza claytonii
Phlox divaricata
Pilea spp.
Polygonatum biflorum
Ranunculus abortivus
Rudbeckia laciniata
Sanguinaria canadensis
Sanicula gregaria
Smilacina racemosa
Smilacina stellata
Smilax spp.
Stachys palustris
Thalictrum dioicum
Thalictrum dasycarpum
Trillium cernuum
Trillium flexipes µ .......
Urtica dioica
Uvularia grandiflora
Viola ...,,._, spp•
Dodder
Dutchman's- breeches
False rue- anemone
White trout -lily
Cleavers
Three- flowered bedstraw
Wild geranium
White avens
Stickseed
Virginia waterleaf
Touch -me -not
Wood -nettle
Michigan lily
Canada mayflower
Clayton's sweet cicely
ssp. laphamii Blue phlox
Clearweed
Giant Solomon's -seal
Kidney -leaf buttercup
Goldenglow
Bloodroot
Gregarious black snakeroot
Racemose false Solomon's -seal
Starry false Solomon's -seal
Carrion -flower
Woundwort
Early meadow -rue
Tall meadow -rue
Nodding trillium
Drooping trillium
ssp. gracilis TTT Stinging nettle
Yellow bellwort
Violet
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -28
•
Lowland Hardwood Forest Species List
Page 3 of 3
Grasses, Rushes and Sedges
Calamagrostis canadensis Bluejoint
Carex pedunculata Long - stalked sedge
Carex sprengelii Sprengel's sedge
Carex radiata Stellate sedge
Carex amphibola var. turgida Ambiguous sedge
Cinna arundinacea Stout woodreed
Elymus wiegandii Canada wild rye
Elymus hystrix.. Bottlebrush grass
Elymus virginicus Virginia wild rye
Glyceria striata Fowl manna -grass
Ferns and Fern Allies
Matteuccia struthiopteris var. pensylvanica Ostrich -fern
Exotic Invasive Species - Do Not Plant
Alliaria petiolata Garlic- mustard
Bromus inermis Smooth brome
Glechoma hederacea Creeping Charlie
cardiaca Lion's ear _...
Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle
Phalaris arundinacea Reed canary-grass
Rhamnus cathartica Common buckthorn
Rhamnus frangula Alder buckthorn
Solanum_ dulcamara Bittersweet nightshade
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -29
• Wet Prairie Species List
Page 1 of 4
Understory Trees
Acer negundo Box elder
Fraxinus pennsylvanica mm Green ash
Populus
tremuloides Quaking aspen
ercus macrocarpa Bur oak
Ulmus americana American elm
Shrubs
Cornus sericea Red -osier dogwood
Cornus racemosa Gray dogwood
Salix petiolaris Slender willow
Salix discolor Pussy willow
Salix bebbiana Bebb's willow
Spiraea alba Meadowsweet
Low Shrubs
Toxicodendron rydbergii
Poison ivy
Vines
Vitis riparia
Wild grape
Forbs
Achillea millefolium Yarrow
Agastache foeniculum Blue giant- hyssop
Ambrosia trida Great ragweed
Ambrosia artemisiifolia Common ragweed
Anemone canadensis Canada anemone
Apios americana Groundnut
Apocynum sibiricum Clasping dogbane
Asclepius incarnata Swamp milkweed
Aster pubentior Flat- topped aster
Aster novae - angliae New England aster
Aster firmus Red-stemmed aster
Aster lanceolatus Panicled aster
sepium Hedge bindweed
Campanula aparinoides Marsh bellflower
Castilleja coccinea Indian paintbrush
Chelone glabra White turtlehead
Chenopodium desiccatum Narrow - leaved lamb's quarters
Cicuta maculata Spotted water - hemlock
Cirsium muticum Swamp thistle
Comandra umbellata Bastard toad -flax
Desmodium canadense Canadian tick- trefoil
Epilobium __._. spp. Willow -herb
Eupatorium maculatum Spotted Joe -pye weed
Eupatorium perfoliatum Common boneset
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -30
Wet Prairie Species List
Page 2 of 4
Euphorbia
Euthamia
Fragaria
Galium
corollata
graminifolia
virginiana
trorum
Gentiana billingtonii
Gentianopsis procera
Geum canadense
Geum aleppicum
Habenaria psycodes
Habenaria lacera
Helenium autumnale
Helianthus giganteus
Helianthus grosseserratus
Hypoxis hirsuta
Iris
Iris
Lathyrus
Lathyrus
Liatris
Liatris
Lilium
virginica
versicolor
b fora
palustris
venosus
pycnostachya
ligulistylis
michiganense
Liparis loeselii
Lobelia spicata
Lobelia siphilitica
Lycopus americanus
Lycopus unorus
Lysimachia quadrora
Lysimachia ciliata
Lythrum alatum
Mentha arvensis var. glabrata
Flowering spurge
Grass- leaved goldenrod
Common strawberry
Three- flowered bedstraw
Closed gentian
Smaller fringed gentian
White avens
var. strictum Yellow avens
Small purple fringed- orchid
Ragged fringed- orchid
Autumn sneezeweed
Giant sunflower
Sawtooth sunflower
Yellow star-grass
var. shrevei Southern blue flag
Northern blue Flag
Two- flowered Cynthia
Marsh vetchling
var. intonsus Veiny pea
Gayfeather
Northern plains blazing star
Michigan lily
Loesel's twayblade
Rough- spiked lobelia
lobelia ....
Cut- leaved bugleweed
Northern bugleweed
Prairie loosestrife
Fringed loosestrife
Wing -angled loosestrife
Common mint
Purple monkey -flower
Perennial evening - primrose
Mimulus ringens
Oenothera perennis
Oxalis spp.
Oxypolis rigidior
Parnassia glauca
Pedicularis lanceolata
Pedicularis canadensis
Phlox pilosa
Polygala sanguinea
Polygala senega
Polygonum amphibium
Polygonum punctatum
Potentilla simplex
Prenanthes racemosa
Pycnanthemum virginianum
Ratibida pinnata
Rubus_.__ ....... ............................... pubescens
Rudbeckia laciniata
Wood - sorrel
Cowbane
American grass -of- Parnassus
........... ...............................
Swamp lousewort
Wood - betony
ssp. fulgida Prairie phlox
Purple milkwort
Seneca snakeroot
var. stipulaceum Water smartweed
Dotted smartweed
Old -field cinquefoil
Smooth rattlesnake -root
Virginia mountain -mint
Gray headed coneflower
Dwarf raspberry
Goldenglow
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C-3 1
Wet Prairie Species List
Page 3 of 4
Saxifraga
Scutellaria
Senecio
pensylvanica Swamp saxifrage
parvula Prairie skullcap
spp. Golden ragwort
Silphium perfoliatum Cup-plant
Sisyrinchium mucronatum Pointed-petal blue-eyed grass
Smilacina stellata Starry false Solomon's-seal
Solidago canadensis Canada goldenrod
Solidago gigantea
Solidago riddellii
Stachys palustris
Teucrium canadense
Thalictrum dasycarpum
Triglochin maritima
Verbena hastata
Vernonia fasciculata
Veronicastrum virginicum
Vicia americana
Viola spp.
Zizia aurea
Giant goldenrod
Riddell's goldenrod
Woundwort
Germander
Tall meadow-rue
Seaside arrow-grass
Blue vervain
Bunched ironweed
Culver's root
American vetch
Violet
Golden alexanders
Grasses, Rushes and Sedges
Agrostis
hyemalis var. scabra Rough bent-grass
Andropogon gerardii
Bromus ciliatus
Calamagrostis canadensis
Calamagrostis stricta
Carex haydenii
Carex pellita
Carex interior
Carex stricta
Carex buxbaumii
Carex bebbii
Carex tetanica
Carex conoidea
Carex lacustris
Carex tenera
Carex sartwellii
Carex scoparia
Carex stipata
Carex granularis
Eleocharis compressa
Elymus trachycaulus
Eriophorum angustifolium
Glyceria striata
Hierochloe odorata
Juncus tenuis
Juncus dudleyi
Juncus nodosus
Juncus vaseyi
Big bluestem
Fringed brome
Bluejoint
Bog reed-grass
Hayden's sedge
Woolly sedge
Inland sedge
Tussock-sedge
Buxbaum's sedge
Bebb's sedge
Wood-sedge
Field sedge
Lake-sedge
Marsh-straw sedge
Sartwell's sedge
Pointed-broom sedge
Awl-fruited sedge
var. haleana Granular sedge
Flattened spike-rush
Slender wheatgrass
Narrow-leaved cotton-grass
Fowl manna-grass
ssp. hirta Sweet grass
Path rush
Dudley's rush
Knotty rush
Vasey's rush
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C-32
• Wet Prairie Species List
Page 4 of 4
Leersia Oryzoides
Muhlenbergia glomerata
Muhlenbergia frondosa
Panicum boreale
Panicum virgatum
Poa palustris
Scirpus atrovirens
Scirpus cyperinus
Sorghastrum nutans
Spartina pectinata
Sphenopholis obtusata
Rice cut grass
Clustered muhly grass
Swamp satin -grass
Northern panic grass
Switchgrass
Fowl meadow -grass
Dark green bulrush
Wool -grass
Indian grass
Prairie cord -grass
Prairie wedge -grass
Ferns and Fern Allies
Equisetum arvense
Equisetum pratense
Onoclea sensibilis
Ophioglossum pusillum
Thelypteris palustris
Field horsetail
Meadow horsetail
Sensitive fern
-
Adder's tongue
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Northern marsh -fem
Exotic Invasive Species - Do Not Plant
Agrostis mm gigantea
Hieracium kalmii
Phalaris arundinacea
Phleum pratense
Plantago major
Poa pratensis
Sonchus spp.
Trifolium hybridum
Trifolium repens
Trifolium pratense
Verbascum thapsus
Vicia villosa
Redtop
Hawkweed
Reed canary-grass
Cultivated timothy
Common plantain
Kentucky bluegrass
Sow - thistle
Alsike clover
White clover
Red clover
Common mullein
Hairy vetch
State Listed Rare Species - Do Not Plant Without a Permit
Botrychium rugulosum
Cypripedium candidum
Juncus marginatus
Platanthera (lava var.
Polygala cruciata
Scleria triglomerata
Viola lanceolata
Xyris torta
St. Lawrence grapefem T
Small white lady- slipper SC
Marginated rush SC
herbiola Tubercled rein- orchid E
var. aquilonia Cross - leaved milkwort E
Tall nut -rush E
....................
Lance- leaved violet T
Twisted yellow -eyed grass E
The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan C -33
N
CITY OF LINO LAKES RIGHT -OF -WAY PLAT NO. 3
- - -- S 8i5o'13 "E - - „
I
( .4i
Az,
\ 2~
\
The orientation of this bearing system 's based
an the West line of the Northwest Ouorler 0f
Section 17. T. 31 N„ R 22 W. which is assumed
to bore 0 Mambo Of N 014'00.W.
3
01
m 6
m
vv Z
8
0 O
W
z S
1 91
. -THE IW 1/4 COR. OF .. / J
/ SEC 17, T. 31 N., R.22 W. / / t
1 / 1 ,/ 42 /
NOT TO SCALE
NOT
NGENr
15.97 \
° w 1'51'13"
R 493.53 I \\i' /j' y A k
C, &9•w s 8603'23'E I r7. '� , / \�F
Go 15.97 I 4T 0 rk / \�'9/
yryy / `(
5.447 \ \
/ \ 1
/
_.._;
MATCH POINT "A=- Q,. 3', ::
at
h•
. , I {4 K //
SRC.' t4 625
tz.660.96 19.05T , X ' 4 V_? A) 4' 432851"
\
`›S 0 08.33'W 80.38
/Vii_LAGE DRIVE
\ ouv..OT A/ `�� VILt ry'1KjT
'\\ 1 g 64'53'09"E ----- / / I yfLL �OEND3
_ x/10.00
r �; - f / 1 \eDArv4.
/ i' \\ .7
Il r / \ \ / 3I /
/80 / N7 ,1\ 1 "' 3 \ \::" /
,/ • -_L. __A:12.--_,/__ ,L-
/
A3 3 �h/ TANGENT-, \1 \
/ 2ry.5 '. N 82,06 51"E 227 40-
pARCEL�5 740.1)
\\ 1 g6.66 THE Byred_
LA
,�6 �p \\ 1 (Rea 2 296,81 IAeQ
s/ 12573 "E1 \1 _5 82.06,5,-w
y
, ,45
ay' a
/ h), �� y"1 _. / / Ar
/ .8 . 0;,,, /� % 8. mar, / /
/ \\ S 6 .." 1 •i/ i 3�,y / / ..r:
229,9A08f 20.37 \ ryy / \/ :::.
A4219'37'29" _ .417, S6t'JJ N S 7101%5;2 f ....‹.7,;%7":/// � /h \ / }
I 4eQ vi �� °9'Wry 013 /'AR // L:) --/
1/// f // : J ::: /
/v /' � �•3tcy 1J3 // g� / / l:i> /
/ •:r
45,69 u � \Y/ \ re pARCf \ 1Q '' a y'r / ' `� / f • ''7
°- 39'39.42" II j
R -N 84• '',/,' /A
11 / ,/,,),188......,0
' -- -- /I V /O :F.
.. / / C,Brg. -N 84'40'47 "W / .S / 0''ly- / �' 6\ 1- -
C.� 44.78 R: � ,� �,(/ '8' N tJ� \ \ / ?3 /
,�4,� ,' .� ' *3.'ea's,.. \ / / - ____ _ la -. a ,t, ,,,!. /3
/
.41.
4i
-t -/ 73
- / .\
/ _
I n
1 7p /
4`7
\ I a
:33"4,
at
.,
pt
\ '•iOj , /
r
CITY OF UNO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA MINNESOTA
SEC. 8 & 17, T. 31 N., R. 22 W.
RIGHT -OF -WAY IN SECTION 77, T. 31. N„ R. 22 W. Dole contained :thin this bee for instructive and inform*, purpose only
PARCEL
OWNER
LOCATION BY PARCEL
IOENDFICATION MA180R
(P,70.)
DEED RECORD
ENTIRE
TRACT
EXISTING
RIGHT-
WAY
NEW HIGHWAY
19GHT -OF -MAY
TEMPORARY
EASEMENT
TEMPORARY
EASEMENT
EXPIRES ON
BALANCE OF
TRACT
REMA,MNO
DOCUMENT N0.
ACRES
ACRES
ACRES
ACRES
DATE
ACRES
1
Co. Lee Buehhale
17- 31 -22 -24 -0013
964546
1,11
0.00
0.08
(T00
N/A
1.03
a 2TE
Paige R. Hanson
17-31-22-24-0011
17- 31 -22 -34 -0012
1180248
2.49
0100
0.15
003
1/01/09
2.34
3
a 310
Katherine 4. 010)0006 one
(WWI UO )0e•k
17- 31 -22 -24 -0010
1970623.010
4,12
0-00
0.
007
7
1/01/09
/0 /09
3.89
•
a 4'X
Bruce Rom one
J.dy 10 Ra 7snie
1-...bond ono .ife
17- 31 -22 -24 -0003
1925997
2.12
0.00
013
0.03
1/01/09
1.99
5
Marvin 4. Ranben and
Ruth F. 7.0X0000. 01,et.
17- 31 -22 -24 -0021
17- 31 -22 -24 -0037
ta70623017
0.,7
000
0.47
000
N/A
0.00
6
KeaMln C. Skopana and
Bernadine A, Sko910M
17- 31 -22 -24 -0007
1072367
0.72
0,00
0.05
0.a
1/01/09
0.67
7
k 7TE -1
k 710 -2
Kenneth C Skaglund and
8er,p•,,e A. 9Y80uae
17- 31- 22 -24- 0006
758413
1,00
0.00
0.20
009
1/01/09
0,80
8
01544 L. Rehbein HIM
Arlene M. Ranben. el.C1.
17- 31 -22 -24 -0028
1970623.001
51970623.076
k 1970633.015
1.11
0.00
1.11
0.00
N/A
000
9
Clan+ Rehbei, el. al -
MAIM
17-31-22-34-0004
914055
156
0.00
0,67
0.00
N/A
2.89
10TE
Lino Lakes Stele Bank
17- 31 -22 -24 -0024
1358394
1,03
0.00
0.0)
004
7/01/09
1.03
11
5 1TE
FORM. H0a911*,
17- 31 -22 -24 -0059
1285871
1976023.004
1.72
0.00
007
004
7/01/09
1.65
k12-12
FAE Holiday Lino Lakes. LLC
17- 31 -22 -24 -0002
1982162.002
3.80
0.00
030
000
N/A
350
13
& 1310
Wells Fargo
17- 31 -23 -12 -0057
1922227
1,98
000
008
009
1/01/09
1.90
5 14
Arcnlond Properly I, LLC
08- 31 -22 -43 -0033
1943310
1.34
0.00
005
0.03
1/01/09
1.29
15
Glenn R Rehben
Myrna L. Rehbe.
17- 31 -22 -21 -0020
17- 31 -22 -21 -0021
1277129
0.43
000
0.43
0.00
N/A
/
0,00
16
Chem R Rehbe:.
M5no L. Rehben. 07.01.
17- 31- 22 -21- 0014
631381
3.97
0.00
0.31
000
N/A
3.56
hereby certify Trot this 70 a true 000 correct representation of 0 survey of the bou08odes os shown and Ih07 sold survey was ala4e under my died
supervision; that on distances are correctly shown in teen 000 deck0*,s of o loaf; th07 the monuments err Fulton/ gu'donce of future surreys d be correctly
pieced in the pplM as slow+ 077.7 the crimple/km of costruclnm, the Right -of -Way bwndary Fines are designated an the plot and ,t woe prepared manumit
to Chapter 505.1793. %anaemia Slewlea
Man L. Everson. Lane Surveyor
Mnnesola License No, 23944
Thu day o1 , 2006.
1101 port of Wks Drive (CSA.77. N.. 23) keeled n Sections 8 and 17. Township 31. Range 22 as slow, on this plot effected by the Gly of Lao Lakes. b
certified to be 146 .1110 pl plot of Mot portion of sold drive .0767. said sections pureuar0t to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 505.1793. The lapping prdl -os
accepted and approved by the City Cou'ei of Lino Lakes. Mnneml0. 0l o regular meeting thereof herd this -day of
0TY Ci LINO LAKES. WMIESOTA
ey . Mayo By . Clerk
Checked one approved this my of
By
Anoka County Surveyor
so-
. 2006
ry
ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO 17-, /V/ \
/ T \ / \f 4 7 \ _
/ 6� Ca:RO `
?77J7 \Oy/ 4 CnSaW \ �� �/ Cru53.S7. ;:: / - - -
/ �n 404/'/ a \ �r /eY ._:_..,
\\ I a�iro / -1 - --
1 /_T z4, -T-T
/ \•••' •:.7j; �\ rLtLAC STREET ` g'� Le-/`
\ '^ ':: . \ / I THE N. UNE OF THE N01 1/1 OF SEC. 17 473... ti p A / 'y `�
I 1 1 DIE N 1/4 COR, OF SEC ,7. (., 0/
\ \ T, 31 N., R.22 W. q. /Q X' r
/ \ I I (THE 5 i/4 COR. CF SEC. 7 / r 0 /c r.etv:'� ':•'.'r•�.. /
\ \,:y a! I I \ T. 31 M. R.22 ■.) u �., j:... 9
/ \D \- 11 \ I /30 ' i / /' s6j7J�1 / 601/ \\
„� j _.\ _ - /�ir\ \ 4°6 / t / THE N. UNE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 17
vl X // , i - \ /�(TNE S UNE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 8)
2637.77 -S 89"26'29 "E 230.00 ; A I _ - _ / /- _ - r
h N 69',4'14.01 - - - - �,F -- -
5 f / { / _ 7-1-- \ \ - -�- s 89.26'%9 "E 2392.96 r -
8•'�• / /2'401 I `\ 1. NE COR. OF sEC. 17.x,
b> f ,vi ,c. ' 4r y 1 1
�/ ' T.AN„R22 r.
/ b ..' - ♦ "1 = (THE SE COR. OF SEC a
ryb 8 1D . V'''im 1 7. Rr?'.f /h / / T. 31 N.. R.22 W)
{ Z M1 /
n Q� n her /if"' ^
I 8 /��1 7/q a i /3},./
/I';'' O- ' ' / •
Denotes 1/2 nab iron pipe maru,rr7en1 lave.
the Ely Right -of -copy line of C.S.A.H. No. 23 per /
/
/_ PHONE: (651) 490 -2000
3535 VAONAS CENTER 0R
S E H ST PAUL, MN 55110
9
80
- 1496.32 - - - - - 22,03/' 22.03'
5 89•47'08 "E N 89'41'08'W N 89•41'08 0W
,` \ \\
\ \ \'1(,\
\i \ \ \ \\J H�3 J7334.
\' \\\ \s 1N ?JS6 S'e 10j3
as y) 3, Ek.7 3:� f J133
��
,1 „ ?3)W ? U 6p 0,7
/
/
. 31 t1...
cf
90 W.
- N89'41108 "W 3636.23 - - -
L - THE EAST - WEST QUARTER LINE OF SEC. 17, T. 31 N., R 22 W.
/
2 / / /\ rd0 1
)
L \ / - �.
Li
E
0 DO 100 20 200 I i i
n .y
8t�le In Fist I •�a,�d _
\ -:
.. / 801 I/
4.
1 inch .1:01021
�I'• \ 11.73 ..
THE E 1/4 COR. OF , - s,
MATCH P07 T "A "-' \\
SEC. 17, T. 31 N., R,22 W,-'
L
�N 8453•20W 4.29
/
anlese shown otherwi e
/ 0 04 oNs 1/2 inch by 19 i'eh %ran pipe
monument sot end marked by Lcense
No. 23944.
0 Denotes 09V'e,Cl0 Department of Transpyrlalian Right- of -spy
monument found,
0 0en04011 Anoka County Section Corner Monument found
Sheet 1 of 1 Sheets
• AGENDA ITEM 66
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala
CITY COUNCIL
DATE:
TOPIC:
August 28, 2006
Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -139 Approving
City of Lino Lakes Right -of -Way Plat No. 3, Lake
Drive /35W Interchange
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND:
As part of the Lake Drive /35W Interchange reconstruction project the City will
need to acquire permanent right -of -way, drainage and utility easements and
temporary construction easements. Sixteen (16) parcels are affected by the
acquisition process.
Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, the City's consulting engineer, has prepared a right -
of -way plat describing the parcels affected by the proposed acquisition. The plat
has been prepared in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.1793.
The plat does not transfer title to the property described and designated by
appropriate parcel number. The plat is used for delineation purposes during the
application process. Approval of Right -of Way plats are not subject to the
statutory requirements associated with subdivision approvals.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 06 -139.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 06 -139
2. Right -of -Way Plat No. 3
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
IIIadoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -139
RESOLUTION APPROVING CITY OF LINO LAKES
RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 3
(LAKE DRIVE /I -35W INTERCHANGE)
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota is proposing to undertake the
reconstruction of the Lake Drive (CSAH 23)/I -35W interchange; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project will require the acquisition of certain properties
to facilitate the roadway improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City's Engineering Consultant has prepared a plat outlining all
tracts and parcels of land affected by the proposed acquisition in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes 505.1793.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
III OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. That City of Lino Lakes Right -of -Way Plat No. 3 is hereby approved.
2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute said plat on
behalf of the City.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 28th day of August, 2006.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
•
N
NOT TO SCALE
905
TANGENT
15.97
01'51'13'
R e: 493.53
Caro. S 86'03.231
CITY OF LINO LAKES RIGHT -OF -WAY PLAT NO. 3
MATCH POINT "A*-- _ .. -.. 35,
5.44r ` \
/ \ 1
N
0
h ^O 0g
40. .
C.BRRF . 6362N41fi525. ' 9.�•E
`~/
TANGENT-,
NOT \ \ \
,n = \ 740-
1 \ / .3 h h / _N 82•p6'S1'E 22
I V / e7n {■
I h? y / \ \�T �, 1\ ■
.h / \ 5
_ PARCEl�S N0. 1) ?S 0'08'33'0 80.38
C.0 15 97 I n ti 4-',/ � 8/6 /? 14'E1 \1 (R c.. 0295 296.7 '11,400- , /Vn LADE GIVE
\ \� / 123.73 1 �S OUTLOT A/
_ • /\ / �_qO f NO.
L - - / \ 1 64'S3'09'E / �� 3
Y -56+: ��10.00 1L46f O
111,4 arsnlotin of this Waring system booed �� - / T , \ / )s /
to non O bear4ig Of 9 014'00'11'. / \ I / / \ \ (j
p �� 111 11 S \ { :" /
___ - - -y /
/ /v 4.''' Sry ti ..' / /
/ lr'.. _,. / 0'042 '4 _p
A% _ -, -, f ,-",,,if er / /
M1' "''!3 I i��
Zh l3
i 229.9• - . J�BF 20.37
C".". // \ h / �,, / t
A- 284,60.00 (H 64 S 7 75'41 E /// o // \Y \H /
7 i \ 031, . N P R 14 // P/ o / r�.i \ \ ;:.
��a / ri
La ci
C.n 44.78
RI 63. is-
spe
3 rjr` A'
I N
N Q Ci
7C
3.
1. 411 JJ. v , 3 / \ \
w /
1 J
Aur
.n
,-THE 1 W 1/4 COR. OF
/ SEC{ 17, T. 31 N., R.22 W.
1 / 1
- 1496.32 _- - - 22.03 V
S 89'41'08'1 N 89'41'08 W
22.03/
N 59'41'08"W
h4
,)J) , %'- 4 /
\ \�
/ / \
\ \
/ \ \CO'
" �` \�
r,, / \ \
/ / \ \ / D
.\ -L \u / I / „O\
1 \
\ \ \I \ \ \\ \N 8B J)5 / 3 \ I
\\ ;t.,8 a `S 6
"53/. .)J
`s 6' J3° toy. 1'.09 f 1153 L \ \7/
0„ /3.3400 7JJ 60� \ 9 / _
/
Sc 1!4 - ..,},u V4 -f
Sec. 17, T. 31 N.. R. 22 W.
- - - - N89'41'08' W 3636.23 - - -
L - THE
EAST -
0 SO 100 160
Sale In Fat
1 inch 10D feat
20
I
THEF� . OF •
SEC. 17, T. 31 N„ R,22
WEST OUARTER LINE OF SEC. 17, T. 31 N., R 22 W.
r
CITY OF UNO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA MINNESOTA
SEC. 8 do 17, T. 31 N., R. 22 W.
RIGHT -OF -WAY IN SECTION 17, T. 31. N., R. 22 W. Delo coma ed *thin Ins boot for Sotruelin and Woo* purpose only
PARCEL
OWNER
LOCATION BY PARCEL
ICENTIFICATION NUMBER
(P.LN.)
DEED RECORD
ENTIRE
TRACT
(31511N6
RIGHT-
MAY
NEW HGIMAY
RIOHT -OF-MAY
TEMPORARY
EASEMENT
TEMPORARY
EASEMENT
E0P1RES ON
BALANCE OF
TRACT
RaWMN6
DOCUMENT Na
ACRES
ACRES
ACRES
ACRES
041E
ACRES
1
Co. Lee 8....7
17- 31 -22-24- 0013
964546
1.11
0.00
0.08
0.00
N/A
1.03
2
4 2TE
Po*. R. Hanson
17- 31 -22 -24 -0011
17- 31 -22 -24 -0012
118074e
109
2.49
0.oD
0.15
. 0.3
1/01/09
2.34
3
k 3TE
1419.01. & 90'2°' ord
Darrell ,L Me.ro46
17- 31 -22 -24 -0010
1970621010
4.12
0.00
0.23
0.07
t
1/01/09
3.89
•
ITE
Bruce Ronne and
Jody
dy Hem Bone
husband 004 wife
17- 31 -22 -24 -0003
1925997
2.12
0.00
0.13
0.03
1/01/09
1.99
5
Marvin A Re6bein and
Ruth F. LeVenda, C.O.
17- 31 -22 -24 -0021
17- 31 -22 -24 -0037
1970621011
0.47
0.W
0.47
0.00
N/A
0.00
6
gt emaeb1� . A dlun0�d
17- 31 -22 -74 -0007
1072367
0.72
0.00
0.05
0.04
1/01/09
0.67
& 7TE -1
& -2
Kenneth C 54041.04 and
aeoe 4. S40glund
17- 31- 22 -24- 0006
758113
1.00
0.00
0.20
0.09
1/01/09
0.80
8
0 4. L Re**, and
AIII101, M. 9066ele, eta
17- 31 -22 -24 -0026
1970623.001
k 1970621016
4 1970621015
1.11
000
1.11
000
N/A
0.09
9
en Renbein e1. oL -
G MAN*
17- 31 -22 -24 -ODDS
914055
356
000
067
000
9/6
2.89
101E
Loo Loan 510ke Bank
17- 31 -22 -24 -0024
1358394
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.04
1/01/09
1.03
& 11 lE
Foivs. Hosoilo1
17- 31 -22 -24 -0059
1265871
1976021004
1.72
0.00
0.07
0.04
1/01/09
1.65
12 -1
k 12 -2
FAE HohOOy Lie Lonee. LLC
17- 31 -22 -24 -0052
1982162.002
180
0.00
0.30
000
N/A
150
13
& 131E
anis Forgo
17- 31 -22 -12 -0057
1922227
1.96
0.00
0.08
0.09
1/01/09
1.90
14
4 141E
An:Mond Prop.ly 1, LLC
08- 31 -22 -43 -0033
1943310
1.34
0.00
0.05
0.03
1/01/09
1.29
15
Own R Rene*
Myrna L R.10ei1
17-31-22-21-0020
17- 31 -22 -21 -0021
1277128
0.43
0.00
0.43
0.00
N/A
0.00
16
Den R Rea**
Myrna L Renoei+, elan.
17- 31- 22 -21- 0014
631561
167
0.05
0.31
0.00
9/4
156
hereby certify 19o1 !Ms s a True and correct meme.1ol m of a survey Of IM bO nekolet a *holm and Not sold covey wee tootle undo' my *eel
sup..sor1, (40* 04 a. 41lomces are correctly shown in feel and Oea%naft W o toot; that the monuments fee futon guidance of future saved a be correctly
0«0.11 in the 5.179.1, Yn nob after dandelion of constnrctk r1 the Rol- of -Way boundary lion on deg ,*I d an the pat and R mm pfepofed pursuant
Alan L Everson. Lond Surveyor This day of
Minnesota License No. 23944
. 2006
That part of Lake Drs. (0.54.0. Na 23) 1000104 i1 Seelig* 8 PM 17. Towne,* 31. Ronge 22 as shown on 1n's plot •11ec104 by *5. Gty of Live Lakes, is
certified to be I4 011001 pal 1 that poetian of soo dive within *i0 °001'60 Pursuant to Isinresolo Statula Clwpl. 505.1793. The tangoing del was
ace.pt04 and apprav04 by Ike of Came( of L'0a Lakes. Minnesota al el rem*, m..1 19 Unreal held th4 _day 01 . 2006.
Ott a UNO LAKES, MnolESpTA
By •Mope By belt PHONE: (651) 490 -2000
1535 VAINJAS CENTER DR
S E H ST. PAUL, MN 55110
Cn•d104 cod ammo* the day of 2006
By
Ana*o Canty Surveyor
the Ely Right- of -Woy Fine of C.S.A.H
ANOKA COUNTY X100940 RIGHT -OF-
/
N
N0.17 7 \
Jam\ 4' J/ '• S" / P0/ : - T
// R-4 //� \ °/ 6�r L- iii ? /= /
rLILAC STREET M1q�
1 (-THE N. UNE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SE0. 17 /T. •., p1. / I �t. rt"` -'�
1 I U' �F ^ C%
1 I THE N T/4 COB. ai SEC. 17, 0 +t v `mil ry �'
A.
1 1 C\ (THE s N., R.22 OF SEC 6 /''- 5 47 `C j`•.`. °`S�" /
I 1 T. 31 N, 822 M) _ _ S / /I
\ 3
1 I \ \\ - /SO I / 6e5JjJ� oP
111 I _ THE N. UNE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC 17
)/ I 1 \ / / (THE s LME OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC e) 1
/ III -� �- - / /- -� / _;�
:• f :�/ //{ Tj- \ \ 4.,....- � -°89'6 9'E 2392.96 -- -
8g� 4: of 1 M NE COB. OF SEC. T7,-�/
o r' 4t M1 / / ,� T. 31 N„ 8.27
/ e .. ♦ 4 / .., + j tt`: ` (nt SE COB. or* sec B.
n q- 9.18 k.4. /M1' / i T. 31 N„ R.22 M,) / J 2.
Lgt5 _t A 1
"'\ / ?fi . M1 \ _.- > --
q / / Denotes 1
I / . / / . . /2 inch iron Vp monument folrld.
6 / / � i / / unfeso shawl otne..ie..
i
0111µII1 % /•1(. /i -1-7\ '=1$; ~ / 0 Denotes 1/2 nen 04 8 Isom ion p*.
//µ \ 11 i3 monument 44 t old tee by License
/ \ \eye.- 1'23'Or _ / No. 23944. •
.A„� \\ 8.484.96 /
'�9 94'53`!0}. 4,29
No. 23 per
AY PLAT
"1 2617.77 -s 8976.29'E 23600
891414.7
L
MATCH POI T
1
1
- - -
0 Oemla M'meso10 Deportment of 7ronmoflollon Rigel -of -May
monumnl laund.
O' Owens *0080 Count' Seer Conn. 01 ,um.11 aura
Sheet 1 of 1 Sheets
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
CITY COUNCIL
DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED:
BACKGROUND:
AGENDA ITEM 6C
Michael Grochala
August 28, 2006
Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -140 Approving
Acquisition of Tax Forfeited Property for Public Use
Pin No. 08- 31 -22 -11 -0055
Pin No. 18- 31 -22 -31 -0018
3/5
Anoka County has notified the city that two parcels within Lino Lakes forfeited to
the State of Minnesota on August 29, 1990. The County previously received a
letter from the City indicating a desire to acquire these properties for stormwater
ponds, however no formal application was completed.
One property is located at the intersection of 79th and Nancy Drive and the other
is located at the intersection of 74th Street and Jon Avenue. Both properties are
part of the City's Surface Water Management system with ponds constructed on
each of them.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 06 -140
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 06 -140
2. General Location Maps
•
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -140
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ACQUISTION OF TAX FORFEIT
PROPERTIES FOR PUBLIC USE
WHEREAS, the County of Anoka has informed the City of Lino Lakes that two
parcels of property within the City forfeited to the State of Minnesota on August
29, 1990. Said parcels are legally described as follows:
That part of Lot 6, Block 10, Sunset Oaks Tying North of the South 220.26
feet thereof (Pin No. 18- 31- 22 -31- 0018); and
Lot 5, Block 2, Twilight Acres 2nd Addition
And
WHEREAS, said parcels are part of the City's Surface Water Management
System and used for drainage and utility purposes
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. Hereby approves the acquisition of said parcels for public use and
authorizes staff to complete the applications for the making of such
conveyances.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 28th day of August, 2006.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
233.29
12
[ 4] 2
119] $
S 1/2 SECTION 18, T. 31, R. 22
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
1
CENTER
SEC. >8
179.91
3
[9] °
130.33
(19]
N 02
33181
200.02
°
200.26
O(JTL07
n
°
L 15
200.02
2
[2]
0 A
200.26
K
233.0.1
10
233.27
23103
233.27
,i
200.02
Its]
ilk
1
220.26 (17]
,
1 200.26
[19] 22936
II`
200.26
o
MARVY _200.26 STREET
150.37
[
3
[ 1
( 60 1
30.84
APOLLO
65 021 134.25 66.02 , 200.26
I I
L.)s
1
FI
[7]
t`
01706
I
2
[6]
3
[9]
200.26 1,
[
1
5
[11]
I I
1 I . I>D
XI 1018]( 233.63
=-1 ( 200.69 1 n R�4.33
I
_ _ y
� 3 '8652 = "�` �eesz ='.L = zs3.=.1 =� � Ts-3M - _ 2182.52 - Tom -20e32
DRIVE - - - aTr of LINO LAKES R \W PLAT 140 1-
4116.47
200.26
6
(02]
3
7411 r- 2060.4- - STREET
- 1549.64- -
- 1359.2
Z
8
[7]
[6]
s� P ■0
605
F
0
115.00 d 1
;98[44] ;16] 39N
162 162
43
8 [7 40 °x
153.04
e 36 I�
s (1384°
m
m
86.43 13221 °
_139
61113Z1'
Y?m
fi
F/4
(25-331
105
103.
,41.56 0
p; we 74. y 61
(am 55
8
865
33
[39]
1j4.13
01
No
.---
_...-'WE5l081A1ED DJt 60. MOM CS.AII. N0. 12 PEP COUNTY BOARD 19E50W006 96-202
460
5 34
[4D3
\.k\-Gk PA
11
[ma]
LAOS
666 43
v
(12]
[2]
[13]-
13.00
T
Al
(17]
4 135.00 -- 345.00
GI
0 1 I
[
22100
(3] i.
--ELM
- -STREET
S 1/4 CORNER
Si' 18
37
-119-
145.130
-4
0.0.44 [1D)
(3]
120.00
[7]
306.56
a
2903
(21]
1 1216.00
� 1
290.5 290
1 1
11
10416
1 I
Es [9]
I
04351
(10] 3
8
L
120.00 / 100.00 104.2 .z6
-4B3.M =60144
703.447,-L607.7z X912 � _._1020/ �1128�
106.00
[25]
106.00
n [24]
06.00
105.00
1 251
554.00
r'
128.001
1I
1 11
(13) /3
1 II
I 11
12100
[
jr_
�1254� -1379'
8, T. 31, R. 22
ya LAKES
: ORNER
'ON 8
S
13754 1
- 15
163.
2548 0 5.09 124.7
3L O 38)\ [37
LOTS DESIGNATED AS THUS Q ARE IN
HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST 2ND ADD
THIS IS A COMPILATION OF RECORDS AS
THET APPEAR IN THE ANOKA COMFIT
OFFICES AFFECTING THE AREA SHOWN
THIS DRAWING IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR
REFERENCE PURPOSES AND TNE COUNTY
IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANT
INACCURACIES HEREIN CONTAINED.
N
6647 60.96 105.67 1
[38]_
200 x217.3 [22
79.77 x147
107.40
•lZCT
155
Si
39
00
PART OF LOT 1,
802. 9.18. N0. 100
60 - 114.71
14]
n '17' [3214.;
13
24699
(31]
12
.555
'[30]
.76
59.11
[43]
s'2
100
26]
1459
as
N.E. CORNER
SECTION 8
41
1 104.375 T 104.375 1 104.375; 90
A
El
18 (4) 1411 [3] "
AZVD.
1 104.39 '1
75
[27]
13?
75
75
123
75
75
15R
75
[5] 1 [7) 2 (58) I [57]
SUB.I NO. 100
25575 -- 1104,375 t 104.3751
i$
[9 8
s 75
75
[2
1
75
[8 S
75
VICKY LANE
75
[7 ] 8
75
1[20]
68
75
75
[191
5
75
90
[87)
U5
(25)
7
149.94
�a.N11 14
74
135. 103.50
TRA L el
7449
154.4
(16]
[136]
OUTLOT C
. [110
[30]
160 ^
.2
891.54
Tell �i
Il
4[4)
41,4
p0
7J 'J T 6295
13,4
[16]
7711 np 7 ni.1I ^i 15 ,(
sL ,i
[1�0]� Ir N 1 Biel l�+lm 1- i 51E56
-`: 'y_ e1 PK ' LANE Q ' 0.Gy5 Eaa6meal Per Oa�61 320255 4. 320797
1` fi51 YY
15 m. Mi_ l911rs,1 29) 1 ) V N. (25] �ra■
W e 1771 Opt I]el 091 l21 11,41 .. -
I[71 lyyl Y • ∎ ■ /9 \ �0 97
■
0 /
•y _[ (24 (15] I
c- . [23] ;-,1 g r e, ^ 12
1 I [737:1
1' ':..*LAN C
r'
�n1
`0'/ [22] 4 s
2422
c-
304.49
8
t5)
9
229.9 11 114
[4] w
20 O0•
[35] it 10[36] '1'o/19/7fiaa. ".%
t7 �,2,i
317.0 0 Z-
1 ' [10] O[9]
150
[20]
: M91y y
[19]
14
[12)
0•
255
[21] I i
• — 7? i00 .R. 1456 + r.
W
0
11 OAK165 1°
[14)
li {
E 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 8
COUNTY SURVEYOR
ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
- 120 -
• AGENDA ITEM 6D
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala
CITY COUNCIL
DATE:
TOPIC:
August 28, 2006
Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -141 Approving
Classification of Tax Forfeited Property with notice to
obtain the property (Pin No. 18- 31 -22 -41 -0011)
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND:
Anoka County has notified the city that a parcel of property (see map) in Lino
Lakes has tax forfeited to the State of Minnesota. The property listed for
classification is located in the Apollo Business Park. This resolution notifies the
county that the city wishes to withhold the property from public sale because it is
unbuildable, and is a part of the City's Surface Water management system
RECOMMENDATION
• Staff is recommending a pp roval of Resolution No. 06-141.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 06 -141
2. General Location Map
•
•
•
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -141
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CLASSIFICATION OF TAX FORFEIT
PROPERTY WITH NOTICE TO OBTAIN THE PROPERTY
(PIN No. 18- 31 -22 -41 -0011)
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners has prepared a list,
designated as Classification List Number 2007 which describes land forfeited to
the State of Minnesota pursuant to Chapter 282 of the Minnesota Statutes, and
has determined that it is advisable to sell said land; and,
WHEREAS, one property within Lino Lakes listed as:
Exhibit A
WHEREAS, the Anoka County Land Commissioner has requested the Lino
Lakes City Council approve classification of the parcel; and
WHEREAS, said property is part of the City's Surface Water Management
System.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. The classification of the parcels are hereby approved.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to notify the Anoka County Land
Commissioner of the City's intent to obtain title to the property for public
purposes.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 28th day of August, 2006.
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
John Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
•
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
•
•
•
CLASSIFICATION
Property Forfeited on 05/17/2006
CITY OF LINO LAKES
UNPLATTED
18- 31 -22 -41 -0011
THAT PRT OF NE1 /4 OF SE1 /4 OF SEC 18 31 22 LYG SLY OF APOLLO DR & LYG NLY OF I 35W & LYG
NELY OF FOL DESC LINE: COM AT MOST ELY COR OF PARCEL 14 CITY OF LINO LAKES R/W PLAT
NO 1, APOLLO DR, TH S 68 DEG 12 MIN 20 SEC W (ASSD BRG) ALG SELY LINE OF SD PLAT 60.07 FT,
TH SWLY 243.99 FT ALG SD SELY LINE BEING A TAN CUR CONC TO SE HAY A RAD OF 610 FT & A
CEN A.NG OF 22 DEG 55 MIN 02 SEC, TH S 45 DEG 17 MIN 18 SEC W TAN TO SD CUR 280 FT TO POB OF
SD LINE, TH S 44 DEG 42 MIN 42 SEC E 308.65 FT TO INTER/W NELY R/W LINE OF I 35W & SD LINE
THERE TERM, EX E 383 FT THEREOF, EX RDS, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC
p1111111
IR ARK NOIRTJ11
-Itg -
UREEN
R,0 L E
E:S ATE
IND-PWR K
AOLLO
B S
PARK
,T H E Ayl LT-A-G•E
/ I ,(NO 1
k
f
'
1/ )
/REG LAND SURVEY/
>
N&-162 7
um RP
H 0 R't'S,
!f
4411/
R;S AK E
IlLtvf ERS. R/CEi LAKE- ,
t N137-
Marsh
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 7, 2006
DRAFT
1 CITY OF LINO LAKES
2 MINUTES
3
4 DATE : August 7, 2006
5 TIME STARTED : 5:39 p.m.
6 TIME ENDED : 7:35 p.m.
7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Carlson (5:40 p.m.)
8 O'Donnell, Reinert and Mayor Bergeson
9 MEMBERS ABSENT : Stoltz
10
11
12 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; City Engineer, Jim Studenski
13 (part); Finance Director, Al Rolek (part); City Planner, Jeff Smyser (part); Community
14 Development Director, Mike Grochala (part); and City Clerk, Julie Bartell
15
16
17 REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
18
19 Item 6A, Consideration of Resolution No. 06 -53, Conditional Use Permit for Accessory
20 Drive Through Facility and Restaurant Outdoor Dining Facilities, Millers Crossroads
21 Shopping Center — The Council requested copies of a previously sent email from the City
22 Attorney regarding this issue. The Council also requested a specific definition of "Coffee
23 Shop" that would be included in the conditions of approval.
24
25 The Council suggested the conditions of approval also include a statement indicating the
26 coffee shop cannot exceed 1,648 feet. The Council also requested information regarding
27 the increase of impervious surface compared to the previously approved site plan.
28
29 REFUNDING EDA LEASE REVENUE BONDS 1998A (CIVIC CENTER
30 COMPLEX)
31
32 Finance Director Rolek referred to the EDA Lease Revenue Bonds 1998A noting the
33 bonds were originally issued to fmance the construction of the Civic Center Complex. A
34 recent change in statutes allows the City the opportunity to refinance the issue with a
35 general obligation issue of the City. Since the new issue will be backed by the full faith
36 and credit of the City, the City will save an estimated $208,000 over the term of the issue,
37 over twice the savings of refinancing with another lease revenue bond.
38
39 Finance Director Rolek advised in order to refinance the issue in this manner, the City
40 must include the refinancing in the capital improvement plan (CIP) for 2006 and hold a
41 public hearing. A 30 -day reverse referendum period follows the public hearing;
42 effectively pushing the sale date out until after this period has elapsed.
43
44 The Council directed staff to schedule and hold the required public hearing and amend its
45 CIP to include the refinancing of this issue.
46
-126-
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 7, 2006
DRAFT
1 CHARTER AMENDMENT
2
3 City Administrator Heitke stated the City Council was presented with a petition with
4 more than 500 signatures at its September 26, 2005 meeting. The petition requested that
5 the City Council place the question of whether "to not allow City Council Members
6 (including the Mayor) to also be members of the Lino Lakes Charter Commission" on the
7 November 2006 election ballot.
8
9 City Administrator Heitke advised the Charter Commission discussed the proposed
10 amendment at their April 13, 2006 and July 13, 2006 meetings. The Charter Commission
11 has proposed a revised amendment that includes the statement "However, one member of
12 the Council may serve as a non - voting liaison to the City Charter Commission ".
13
14 The Council directed staff to obtain an opinion from the City Attomey regarding the
15 recommended revision. This item will appear on the next Council work session agenda.
16
17 Mr. Bob Bening, author of the proposed amendment and petition, stated he does not have
18 a problem with the revision recommended by the Charter Commission. However, he
19 would prefer the amendment be placed on the ballot to be voted on by residents.
20
21 HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS
22
23 City Administrator Heitke provided the background relating to historical documents of
24 the City noting that very early documents of the City were found in a safe when an old
25 building was torn down. Those documents are not in the possession of the City. If an
26 individual is holding onto those documents staff believes the City should make an effort
27 to recover them.
28
29 The Council directed staff to draft a letter to the individuals requesting they work with
30 staff to return the originals to the City and obtain copies for themselves. The Council
31 also indicated the City needs to ensure there is a safe place to store and preserve the
32 original documents.
33
34 PRIOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COSTS
35
36 City Administrator Heitke distributed a breakdown of costs per year by vendor related to
37 the last comprehensive planning process totaling $211,171.41.
38
39 City Administrator Heitke also advised information regarding the Financial Work Session
40 will be distributed tomorrow via email.
41
42 The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
43
44 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
45 August 28, 2006.
2
•
•
•
1
2
3
4
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 7, 2006
DRAFT
5 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
6
7
8 Transcribed by:
9 Kim Points
10 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
11
3