HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/10/2008 Council PacketSPECIAL
• WORK SESSION AGENDA
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
Monday, November 10, 2008
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Community Room (not televised)
5:30 P.M.
1. Continued Review of Comprehensive Plan
Meeting will be recessed for 6:20 p.m. Canvassing Board Meeting and 6:30 p.m. regular
council meeting and reconvened after the regular council meeting, if needed.
Adjourn
PAGE 1
l S {-(a V4k'. ss iovi
hbito 108
Council Questions Received since 9/29/08 meeting
1. Please review for us how infrastructure availability or other requirements in the plan
will allow this or future councils to have some control over the annual rate of growth
we experience in the next 20 years. I am interested in what tools the council will
have to manage the 6600 units planned for the next 20 years.
2. What is staffs opinion on our ability to have our current ordinances reviewed and
updated by the time this plan will go into effect to help ensure the quality of
development meets the vision of the citizens who developed the plan?
3. What are the best ways for us to introduce affordable housing projects and products
to our community? I am in full support of lifecycle and affordable housing but want
to make sure we do this so it results in the vision we have for our city. An item I
would like to discuss is whether we target specific areas for this type of housing, or
possibly spread this type of product across all development projects going forward.
4. My concern is that Lino Lakes is a bedroom community. In order to attract business
and retail do we need to be intentional and have a plan in place? Can you speak to
how the comprehensive plan addresses this issue?
5. Economic Development establishes goals to have a diverse tax base and to take
less pressure off of the residential market (individuals /family). How specifically are
we addressing this in our plan? Further EDAC involvement/input? A part of our goal
setting objectives - -- correct?
6. Housing stock/composition. I understand the challenge with affordable housing. I
am more interested and concerned about our plan to attract the senior housing. In
the summary—it says that the City will have a commitment to assess - - -how will this
be done? Page 3 -5, Goal 6 states "enhance opportunities for senior housing ". Page
4 -15 states that the City will complete a senior housing study to determine future
senior housing needs. Can you state what the study will look like i.e., who will
conduct the study and generally in what timeframe?
7. Page 1 -6, Table 1 -1 Forecasts. We are a Developing Community. Is this correct —
the Met Councils forecast is based on our past plan — namely the 147 limitation? So,
is the City of LL forecast based on our new philosophy of quality vs. quantity? Is this
why our forecasts exceed the Met Council?
8. Table 1.1 —page 1 -14. How does our plan process and detail compare to other
Cities that Ciara works with? Our plan involves a resident survey, citizen visioning
AND RCWD. I understand this to be unique i.e., to balance our plan /growth with
natural resources. Why are other Cities not doing this — because of our emphasis on
the environment? Because so much of our City is comprised of natural resources?
9. Table 3 -1: I know that NO TWO CITIES are alike - - -but is there an average
composition of land use in the suburbs? I don't know how you compare - - -I see that
commercial is less than 1% now (future closer to 3 %) Open water and parks have a
huge percentage. From a marketing perspective how does Lino compare to the
average City? Can we use that to our advantage - -- our unique "value proposition"
for residential and commercial growth?
10.Table 3-4 -- -mixed use site characteristics - - -- Centerville Rd /CR J is 50/50 and
Centerville Rd /Birch at 80 /20 - - -how were these derived?
11. Reference was made in our plan as to the Twin City Army Ammunition Plant
(TCAAP) -- -page 4 -11. How much information were you actually able to attain from
the City of Arden Hills on the plans for the TCAAP? Is there a set timeline for
development? The plan also mentions that the demand for rental housing may
increase because of this development. Why in Lino Lakes?
12. Page 5 -5 -- -table 5 -2 from DEED I would like to see our City be proactive in getting
key growth industries into our City —DEED mentions that education /health services,
professional /business services and hospitality.
13. Page 5 -9 highlights the need for strong retail growth. Does our plan address this
need?
14. Employment. DEED has the City at around 4,000 now. Explain how we get to the
2030 number.
15. Lake Drive - -- development - - -is only the North side addressed?
16. What is the impact on the city if funding for transit remains constant in today's
dollars? The City is obviously dependent on outside funding - - -how do we influence
and get results ( I am sure that every City is asking this) for mass transit, Park and
Rides, Rush Line Corridor and Public Transit? How do we fulfill our plan /strategies?
17. Does the expansion of the Airport in Blaine have any impact on our comprehensive
plan? How does Blaine, if they are aggressive in the next 20 years, impact
us? same with Hugo?
18.The Lino Senior Center is mentioned in our facilities plan. Our we planning on the
same site with enhancements? Is there a plan?
19. Recreation Center —Goal 1: Is a timeframe needed for the plan or is the concept
ok?
20. Regional Library is mentioned in our facilities plan. Can you give us the details and
timeline as you know them today?
I hereby call for a special meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council
to be held on M.0\1 . 17 , 2008 at t, .o o t ./Y\ . for
the purpose of &my, Ply (- ,v(ew)
said meeting having been properly noticed and called.
Joh Be i es • , Mayor
The Townhomes at Arbor Lakes
16 units /acre
The Bridges in Maple Grove
Just Off Main Rental Community, Maple Grove
13.9 units /acre
Maple Lakes, Maple Grove
5.5 units /acre
Proposed Townhomes, Legacy at Woods Edge, Lino Lakes
12 units /acre
10.4 units /acre
Cobblestone Lake, Apple Valley
Townhomes only:
7.44 units /acre
Victor Gardens, Mixed Use Hugo
Single Family and Townhomes:
3.94 units /acre
Excerpts from Draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Growth Management Tools
Many elements of the Comprehensive Plan and subsequent zoning ordinances and subdivision
code updates will be focused on our effort to ensure quality development that does not
negatively impact natural features of the community. As the City grows, growth will be shaped
and managed in a variety of ways:
• The City's abundant natural resources will have a significant effect on the city's
development pattern, as development in environmentally sensitive areas will be managed
appropriately to ensure protection of resources. The City has several tools to protect
these resources.
• The City's growth will also be shaped by the availability of infrastructure, as urban -
scale development is not feasible without municipal sewer and water service. A staging
plan, which identifies the timing and phasing for sewer service to all areas within the city,
was developed as part of the Comprehensive Plan process. Additionally, growth will be
timed to ensure that appropriate infrastructure and transportation improvements are
completed to accommodate new development.
• The City's official controls, such as zoning regulations, subdivision regulations, and the
official zoning map, must be updated to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
These controls represent the rules and regulations that govern city decisions regarding
growth and development.
• Finally, the City's Growth Management Policy provides for additional flexibility to
manage growth in an efficient manner while still responding to market conditions. The
policy works in conjunction with the staging plan, as it dictates the criteria for moving
from one staging area to another. Each of these growth management tools are discussed
in greater detail below:
Protection of Natural Resources
The City has several tools to protect natural areas while also managing future growth. These
tools include:
• Parks, Natural Open Space, and Trail System Plan (2004): The Lino
Lakes Parks, Natural Open Space, and Trail System Plan identifies a future park,
trail, & greenway system throughout the city. This plan provides a framework for
restoring and managing the city's natural resource areas, and enables the City to
prioritize sensitive areas for preservation. The City uses this plan in working with
developers to preserve open space and natural areas, and will continue to do so
as development occurs.
• Suitability Analysis:This suitability analysis compiled a variety of natural
resource data, including information on wetlands, plant communities, rare plant
species, and soils to determine areas marginally suitable for development,
moderately suitable for development, and highly suitable for development. The
suitability map was consulted during the development of the Land Use Plan. This
data will be available to property owners /developers for preparing site plans and
for staff to use during the development review and approval process to ensure
that development suitability of each site is considered.
• Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development:
The Handbook (published in December 1999) provides detailed guidance to
enable the City to establish a viable conservation development program, and
includes: a natural resources based planning model and framework, an overview
1
Excerpts from Draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan
of Lino Lakes existing ecological resources, priority areas for ecological protection
within the City, action steps for protection of ecological systems, potential open
space and greenway corridors, a framework for ecological restoration and
management, and principles of and guidelines for conservation development.
• Planned Unit Development (PUD) to promote Low Impact
Design /Conservation Development Principles :The purpose of this
approach to development is to preserve and enhance valued resources within
new development. To preserve these areas, development uses low impact design
principals, and /or is clustered on only a portion of the site, while environmentally
sensitive areas are preserved as open space. The City of Lino Lakes has
effectively used conservation subdivision techniques for the past several years to
preserve or plan for the preservation of valuable resource areas. Incentives will
apply to all development that is located within or adjacent to environmentally
sensitive areas. Incentives may include density bonuses, reduced fees, an
expedited permitting process, or flexibility regarding staging area boundaries and
timing.
• Rice Creek Watershed District Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan:
As part of the integrated comprehensive planning process, the Rice Creek
Watershed District prepared a Resource Management Plan to provide a
watershed -based approach to wetland management. This process included an
analysis of the city's future land use plan to determine the impacts of future
growth on the area's aquatic resources. A key component of the plan is to
establish a Wetland Preservation Corridor. This corridor may include high priority
wetlands, natural open space (uplands), greenway connections, and marginally
suitable development areas. The plan identifies several strategies to mitigate
development impacts, particularly within the Wetland Preservation Corridor, as
more fully described in Chapter 2: Resource Management System Plan.
Infrastructure Capacity
The availability of infrastructure will also be used to determine the timing and feasibility of new
growth. As part of the comprehensive plan, the transportation, water, and sanitary sewer
systems were analyzed to determine their capacity to accommodate the 2030 and full build -out
growth forecasts. These systems are discussed more fully in Chapters 6, 7 and 8.
Land Use and Transportation
The city's Land Use Plan was analyzed to determine compatibility with the local transportation
system. Based on this analysis, improvements to the transportation system were identified to
accommodate additional growth in Lino Lakes. These improvements are discussed in the
Transportation Chapter of this plan. Development review will include analysis of the
transportation system and transportation improvements may be required as part of the
development permitting process.
Utility Staging
The provision of sewer and municipal water service will be a key factor to determine the timing of
future growth. As part of the Comprehensive Plan process, the future land use plan was analyzed
to determine future water supply and wastewater infrastructure needs to accommodate new
growth. These systems will need to be expanded to accommodate future development in the
community. Therefore, a staging plan was developed to identify the sequence and anticipated
timing of water and sewer provision. The staging area boundaries are based on the city's sewer
2
Excerpts from Draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan
districts, current development patterns, and land needed for forecasted development. The
staging plan establishes the pattern, timing, and location of future growth to 2030 and beyond.
The Staging Plan reflects the City's three growth areas where regional interceptors are located,
the northeast, northwest, and south growth areas. It is noted that the White Bear Interceptor is
located 1/2 mile from the Lino Lakes border and is not shown on the Staging Plan. The Staging
Plan identifies areas for growth from 2010 to 2020, 2020 to 2030, and post 2030. To promote an
efficient growth pattern, development outside of the current utility staging area will be limited to
agriculture related uses and single family residential at a density of one unit per 10 acres.
Therefore, during the time period associated with Stage 1 (2008- 2020), development in Stage 2
and Stage 3 will be limited to agriculture uses or single family residential at one unit per 10
acres. The City will monitor growth by annually assessing market conditions and land capacity to
determine when the next staging area should be opened for development. The staging plan
cannot force development to occur. Rather, it prohibits urban growth from occurring outside
areas planned for utility service. It should be clear that while there are legitimate reasons why
cities should stage and time growth in an orderly and contiguous manner, there is nothing about
adopting a staged growth plan that forces any private property owner to sell their land before
they wish to do so.
The staging plan provides several benefits to Lino Lakes, which are listed below:
• A staging plan creates orderly logical growth pattern based on planned development
patterns and availability of infrastructure.
• Clearly defines timing at which land is potentially available for development.
• Allows the City greater control over the pace and location of new development combined
with providing necessary services when planned development occurs.
• Provides greater ability to plan, budget and set goals for future development based on
the Staging Plan.
Official Controls
Official controls, such as zoning regulations, subdivision regulations, and the official zoning map,
must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. These controls represent the rules and
regulations that govern city decisions regarding growth and development. Examples of updates
to the official controls to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan include the following:
• Update the official zoning map to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (Figure 3-
3).
• A zoning district or districts will be established as "holding zones" for urban development.
These holding zones are applicable to all land use designations on the 2030 Land Use
Plan. Specific areas will be zoned to a district (i.e., R -1, R -1X, R -2, NB, LB, etc.)
consistent with the land use designation (i.e., Low Density Residential, Commercial,
Industrial, etc.) when municipal services are available and the current staging area is
expanded to include the area.
• Develop design standards to ensure high quality residential, commercial and industrial
development in the community.
• Review and update, landscape and design standards to promote attractive, quality
development that enhances the character of Lino Lakes.
• Adopt a new Growth Management Policy consistent with the Plan.
3
Excerpts from Draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan
• Review and update the existing residential zoning district requirements and subdivision
regulations to ensure that the densities allowed in the Plan can be achieved (i.e., lot size,
height, setbacks, etc.).
• Create a method of providing incentives, such as density bonuses and fee reductions, for
development projects that achieve goals in the Comprehensive Plan, particularly for
implementing the city -wide conservation design framework presented in the Resource
Management System Plan and for providing affordable housing.
• Review and update site planning and stormwater management requirements to require
Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, as appropriate, to achieve the combined
goals of the Resource Management System Plan and Land Use Plan.
• Revise the maximum allowable impervious surface coverages for each land use category
as a primary strategy to reducing the volume of water from new development.
• Review and update the zoning and subdivision ordinances to reduce impediments to
affordable housing.
• Review and update official controls to ensure land use and the timing of development is
consistent with the planned and programmed transportation system.
4
■._ ma. • as .•aullaallaa.la._•uaaa.a.a•...
■` � pi a � i
0.
PRA°
ir — .
`irtlwk--!
' nn^�1''11Q _:1-.0 111 f;
s.... J.•.'iYYp.1t...- ,
•
44- l-�
Al cif/,
l .t/
a.i+a• ••lLAli ll ....Ca 1. Rall•LA■J u Y ■
la AILLBAA
•
Lilac St.
cr
Q.
•
Peltier o
Lake 2 NL
•alaataa.■MS_P .•..0..,t•L.,a.aMaat•LA4t.s.1 }
a
•
Las
Rice Creek
Chain of Lakes
Regional Park Reserve
N' l
Centerville
Lake
f44i
r.
on
j .Amelia
'1,ake
Ash St ,"
ti•• ./....s -- '.
• •' Otter
•
• •
• + Lake
::JLaa•JuLa•�a. .aa..�.•,- .T.,. -r..•T.- 11:Y..:...ir .,-.
•
Planned Residential Land by Utility Staging (2008 - 2030)
City of Lino Lakes 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
N
4,000 0 4,000
Feet
MUSA Boundary 1 .J Municipal Boundary
Stage 1A Planned Service Area (2008 -2015) MCES Interceptors
Stage 1B Planned Service Area (2015 -2020)
„Stage 2A Planned Service Area (2020 -2025)
Stage 2B Planned Service Area (2025 -2030)
Developed Areas
Wetlands
Open Water
Right -of -Way
CITY. ,'OF
KE
November 14, 2008
Prepared by Bonestroo
K /activeworklGisserver /000586 -06001 -0 linolakescomplan /res staging temp.rnxd
DRAFT
Growth Management Policy
In addition to the tools described above, the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee discussed
the development of a revised Growth Management Policy for the city. The Growth Management
Policy should provide a clear basis for efficient development staging as well as flexibility to
respond to market conditions. The new policy must work in conjunction with the staging plan to
establish the criteria for moving from one staging area to another.
The 2009 Growth Management Policy will include the following elements:
1. The City will create a fully integrated Comprehensive Plan and keep it up to date with
biannual reviews.
2. The Comprehensive Plan will include a staging plan defining development staging areas sized
to accommodate forecasted growth.
3. The City will monitor the 10 -yr staging areas and annually determine if adequate land
remains available.
4. All development must be located within the current 10 -yr staging area unless a
Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved that redefines the current 10 -yr staging area.
5. All development must be phased within each 10 -yr staging area in accordance with the
staging plan unless the City Council determines, by resolution, to redefine the location of the
current 5 -yr phase. kA44 0.aaitbk IC yc u Ske ia..pe
5 :6, Prior to reaching the time threshold for the next 10 -yr staging area or 5:y phase within a
10 -yr staging area, depicted on the staging plan, the City Council will determine by resolution
if the next area is to be opened to development. The following criteria will be used to
determine where and when to open up the next _r, staging area, or 5 -yr phase within a
staging area, in accordance with the timing indicated on the staging plan:
a. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate analysis
will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions and
transportation improvements are required to support new development. If infrastructure
is not available and cannot be made available in a timely manner to support expanding
into the next 10 -yr staging area or 5 -yr phase within a staging area, the city may refrain
from opening up the next staging area, or portions thereof.
b. Different areas of the city can be considered independently. A decision to open one area
of the city to development does not automatically open a different area of the city.
Decisions to open new areas to development should clearly define and map the area
being opened.
c. This process does not require a comprehensive plan amendment because it is in
accordance with the timing indicated on staging plan.
6-.7.The following criteria will be used to determine if the city should allow a specific development
project to occur early in a 10 -yr staging area, or 5 -yr phase within a staging area, prior to the
timing indicated on the staging plan.
DRAFT
19:a.The proposed development must be located within both the current and the next 10 -yr
staging area,or 5 -vr phase, or located adjacent to the current 10 -yr staging area, or 5 -yr
phase.
eb. The proposed development must be master planned. Small, piecemeal developments do
not justify redefining the 10 -_y -r staging area, or 5 -yr phase.
d-c, The proposed, master planned project must provide discernable public values.
e:d.Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate analysis
will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions and
transportation improvements are required to support new development.
f-:e, There must be a commitment that the development will pay its proportionate share of
infrastructure improvement costs associated with development.
., All development must adhere to the Resource Management System Plan, including all its
components, as this plan provides a conservation design framework for growth within the
city.
9,g Include standards in subsequent ordinance updates to ensure quality development that
minimizes negative impacts on natural and cultural features of the community.
fin. ��r• -�� I I 1 I'. � lyxi.4 .A.1.e.6 j �
•
1 7
r•.
i
tiJ r rt
47 , ' L
ril
n [ ki .. Le=► I<' .. -�:
°a iii •��. �1 i ♦ .,,� V
A 1;44"/% e: �,.- ` mg
▪ lower ;! �� C II N II IIIIIIIIIIIIIP.
- tai '11" =.'mow: ° = =,��11 IIIIIul;:- 2 I MOB 441r
LAY.1•
•
I G%.- ��'1111
A!lsl
•
...L %L LSitL►LlLLt ilJ Y MALI lu 11tlAY.tt1.% 1u1 'JUL CPA
WE
4r••
ri�
Peltier
Lake •\
• • •...-.12.1i• • alnr."Ill LACK !!
—1
•
\l jj
' ..a!HIPU Ili'
a
Baldwin
Lake
fs
dill ►�� t fig
1 Jam, ralliF
- 02011111111r
•
•
dar, .1
L- .r
I ..%�
•
a.d fuiir•.iia ArYye. L�l rru I r %JAI:11_,,a .1a.A<•.i.iiY11; • • raw., .zh-•-•r•- vr•i-•17-rrr• -•-• •
Otter i 1M '1
Lake � ��i�
Utility Staging Map
City of Lino Lakes 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
4,000 0
4,000
Feet
•„ Stage 1A Planned Service Area (2008 -2015)
CZStage 1B Planned Service Area (2015 -2020)
Stage 2A Planned Service Area (2020 -2025)
Stage 2B Planned Service Area (2025 -2030)
Stage 3 Planned Service Area (Post 2030)
No Service Area
117.5 Municipal Boundary
MCES Interceptors
k' Regional Park Reserve
! Wetlands
Open Water
Right -of -Way
November 14, 200£
Prepared by Bonesho
K: /activework/Gisserver /000586- 06001 -0 li nolakescomplan /stagi ng. mx
2030 Density Scenarios for New Development
Gross Density' Net Density2
Density Range (units /acre) (units /acre)
Minimum 2.2 3.1
Average 3.0 4.2
Maximum 3.4 5.2
wetland acres included
2 wetland acres removed
c
0)
53
771 s-1 n (o uc -a %Al k fec510, I (/ i o f vg
L• is. •3k l 1u lil.liaulLL MAWR it 1.I- u• ■ u ■JJJL
r Jx■a,lu,�u ,ill•" • ux YJLILL��LLL�ir .6YJ.�L,LrIJJL {iN1,Y
�I+ ' itifig 4A, •' ..4!w ' �1 LAW
e7 rital
J J1.7trJJJL■ksuJ_LL,u
•
CO— -
•
0
•
Peltier
Lake
_Ulm]. • • ■ —w. •JJII LA■1,SJJl■UJLL,AL■
•
ti
City of Centerville
•
Rice Creek
Chain of Lakes
Regional Park Reserve
•
•
•
•
164 JOE
p fiti�L
L
• l{•JJ .0 Ji••��a•ati tMitt.: uJ.r6a Lu,J111.11■ l.i .J•
Cedar
Lake
Ash St.
Amelia
♦1,ake
Otter
•
• Lake
•..
•
Draft Proposed Utility Staging
City of Lino Lakes 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
4,000
0
4,000
Feet
MUSA Boundary
Stage 1 Planned Service Area (2008 -2020)
C.7; 2 Planned Service Area (2020 -2030)
Stage 3 Planned Service Area (Post 2030)
•,,; No Service Area
MCES Interceptors
Developed Areas
Wetlands
Open Water
Right -of -Way
C I T Y , O F
KE
November 10, 2008
Prepared by Bonestroo
K /activework/Gisserver/ 000586 - 06001 -0 linolakescomplan /staging temp.mxd
•
•
•
Tuesday
November 10, 2008
6:20 p.m.
Members: Mayor Bergeson, Council Members Gallup, O'Donnell, Reinert & Stoltz
➢ Call to Order and Roll Call
1. Consider acceptance of municipal canvassing board report declaring the results of
the November 4, 2008 election
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 1
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk
MEETING DATE: November 10, 2008
TOPIC: Canvass Election
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote)
BACKGROUND:
Minnesota Statute 205.185 requires that the governing body of a city conducting an
election must canvass the returns and declare the results within seven days. Included are
the returns of the November 4, 2008 Lino Lakes Special Election, An Amendment to the
Charter, as well as a copy of that portion of the tapes from each precinct, pertaining to the
question.
OPTIONS:
1. Move to accept the report as it appears.
2. Reject the report
RECOMMENDATION:
Option #1
•
•
m
r
m
-1n
Z
z �
z
0 cno
3 c"
Cr E r
CD
E
.p > O
N73 r
comm
-o Cn
0
X
—I
c
c
0
c
0 0
(Total # Voters
(Absentee
(Voted In Person on Election Day
lOvervote
Blank
ONI
'Yes
CITY QUESTION- AMENDMENT TO CITY C
Total # of Reg. Voters
# of Persons Registering on
Election Day
I# of Reg. Persons at 7 a.m.
87%
01
CO
CO
0
CO
O
o
3
775
302
1 1338
--a
CD
W
13
7
it
j
87%
1740
I_ 133
°
0�0)
455
HARTER
I 2003
C1)
CO
71
7
N
84%
1451
108
1343
O
138
904
409
1723
CO
CO
1525
Pr. #3
CO
o
2035
210
1825
O
O
al
co
O
O
2331
N
O
-
N
O0
O
Pr. #4
88%
1075
01
980
0
108
NJ
341
1 1228
CO
-v
CA
O
0)
o
1744
217
1527
O
131
1051
562
2024
N
O
O
1 1815
ma
'
it
0)
CO
0
1848
125
-a
W O
O
1058
C)
O CO
N
O
N
0
O
1 1870
7
y
average = 87%
-
O
01
O
0)
---4
10084 I
O
864
6529
3658
I 12723 I
-a
01
W
1 11130
TOTAL
m
r
m
-1n
Z
z �
z
0 cno
3 c"
Cr E r
CD
E
.p > O
N73 r
comm
-o Cn
0
X
—I
** PRECINCT: 5610 **
Lino Lakes P1
******°*****************
BALLOTS CAST
NON/A8S ABS
10 7 5
1072 74
TOTAL 1079 79
BALL0SCACTSUMMARY
BLANK VOTED
OVERVOTED
UNDERVOTED 3
LINO iPT; QUE5TI[t-
RACE # 711
# RUNNING
# TO VOTE FOR
# TIMES COUNTED 1158
# TIMES OVERVOTED 0
HO 775
PRECINCT: 5640 **
Lino Lakes P4
*****+�'�*********�*****
B TS CAST
.RD NON/ABS ABS
215 1783 205
5
210
10216 42
TOTAL
BALLOTS CAFT SUMMARY
BLANK VOTED
UVERVOTED
UNDERVOTE0
WRITE-IN
LINO LAKES QUESTION
RACE # 711
# RUNNING
# TO VOTE FOR
401
48
1
# TIMES COUNTED 2035
# TIMEF OVERVOTED 0
# TIMES BLANK VOTED 117
YES 899
NO 1019
************************
•
** PRECINCT: 5620 **
Lino Lakes P2
BALLOTS CAST
CARD NON/ABS
10211 845
10212 762
TOTAL 1607
ABS
74
BALLOTS CAST SUMMARY
BLANK VOTED
OVERVOTED
UNDERVOTED 147
WRITE-IN 34
LINO LAKES QUESTION
RACE # 711
# RUNNING 2
# TO VOTE FOR 1
# TIMES COUNTED 1740
# TIMES OVERVOTB} 0
# TIMES BLANK VOTED 189
YES 455
NO 1096
��******************
_____
-*****
** PRECINCT: 5650 **
Lino Lakes P5
BALLOTS CAST
CARD NON/A8S
10214 980
BALLOTS CAST SUMMARY
BLANK VOTE
OUERVOTED
UNDERVOTED
WRITE-IN
95
193
LINO LAKES QUESTION
RACE # 711
# RUNNING 2
# TO VOTE FOR 1
# TIMES COUNTED 1075
# TIMES 0VERVGTED 0
# TIMES BLANK VOTED 108
YES
341
NO
626
1-.4...:.1-::.-4-..÷.**4-.4...t4.4.,****
• z ~c4# 4# 4# 4t 4# xi r-
om ri �
S7. m � ++ +�n73 o
• ��zc +
▪ zo
• mmm 2: � m 77. --1
• mmm o� 1 m
+��rr �
+
m��m =+m
�m mc���
• n -n v mm
o z:, --1
� :N3
• ��
° ��
* c, z e* ��
' * ** -c
* ~^
�
* �m�
* mm� �
*
o**
e*
��
**
** u
* • CD
Lino LaKes P3
BALLOTS CAST
CARD NUN/ABS ABS
10213 47 1
10214 1296 107
TOTAL 1343 108
BALLOTS CAST.SUMMARY
BLANK VOTED 0
OVERUOTED 7
0NDERV0TED 233
WRITE-IN 27
************************
LINO LAKES QUESTION
RACE # 711
# RUNNING 2
# TO VOTE FOR 1
# TIMES COUNTED 1451
# TIMES OVERVOT2D 0
# TIMES BLANK VOTED 138
YES 409
HO 904
************************
** PRECINCT: 5660 **
Lino Lakes P6
BALLOTS CAST
CARD NON/ABS ABS
10051 626 143
10145 701 74
TOTAL 1527 217
BALLOTS CAST SUMMARY
BLANK VOTED 0
0VERVOTED
5
UNDBRVOTED 164
WRITE-IN 41
LINO LAKES QUESTION
RACE # 711
# RUNNING
# TO VOTE FOR
2
1
# TIMES COUNTED 1744
# TIMES OVERVOTED 0
# TIMES BLANK VOTED 131
YES
---
NO
1051
************************
CD
0
-CD
FIT
5• CD
't
0
v
O,
=t 0
m =
CD CD
0 0'
K
0
5 �.
v
0
v
0
v
0
co
5.
CO
GO
0
v
a
0
CD
5
0)
5
m
cD
1
3
0
co
rn 1
c_
c
cD
x
v
2
5
CD
0_
0
0
m
0_
v
=
0_
v
0
cD
0_