HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/27/2009 Council PacketSUMMARY MINUTES
Monday, July 27, 2009
***********
6:30 p.m.
(Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16)
City Council: Mayor Bergeson, Council Members O'Donnell, Reinert, Stoltz & Gallup
Acting City Administrator, Dan Tesch
Council Workroom (not televised)
A) Review Regular Council Agenda
B) Charter Commission Budget Request
(referred to Aug 3 work session)
➢ Open Mike / Public Comment
No comments
➢ Call to Order and Roll Call
6:45 p.m. — Present were Mayor Bergeson, Council Members Reinert, Gallup,
O'Donnell and Stoltz
➢ Pledge of Allegiance
➢ Setting of Agenda
The agenda was accepted as presented
A)
Consideration of Expenditures:
i) July 27, 2009 (Check No. 86252 through 86373)
in the amount of $245,711.08;
ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 3856 through 3873)
in the amount of $33,767.02
B) Consider approval of July 6, 2009 Special City Council
Meeting Minutes
C) Consider approval of July 13, 2009 City Council Meeting
Minutes
D) Consider approval of July 13, 2009 Special Council Work
Session Minutes
Pg 4 -20
Pg 21
Pg 22 -23
Pg 24 -29
Pg 30 -31
Council Agenda
-2- 7/27/2009
SUMMARY MINUTES
E) Consider approval of June 3, 2009 Special Council Work
Session Minutes
Pg 32 -38
F) Consider Resolution No. 09 -51 Amending Resolution No. 09 -40 Pg 39
Action Taken: Motion by Gallup, seconded by Stoltz, to
approve the Consent Agenda, Items lA through 1F, was adopted
A)
A)
No Report.
No Report.
Consideration of Resolution No. 09 -49, Accepting a
donation of $100 from Residential Mortgage Group's
"Refer a friend, Build your community" program.
Action Taken: Motion was seconded and adopted to
approve Resolution No. 09 -49 as presented
No Report.
Consideration of Resolution No. 09 -52, Approving Variances
to the requirements for lot area, lot width and road frontage
for Xcel Energy, Paul Bengtson
Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Reinert, to
approve Resolution No. 09 -52 as presented, was adopted
Pg 40 -41
Pg 42 -47
B) Public Hearing, I -35E /CSAH 14 Interchange Improvement
Project, Michael Grochala Pg 48 -49
Action Taken: Public hearing was held; Motion by Stoltz, seconded
by Reinert, to close the public hearing, was adopted
C) Consideration of Resolution No. 09 -48, Approving 2009/2010
Foxborough Management Plan, Marty Asleson
Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by Gallup, to
approve Resolution No. 09 -48 as presented, was adopted
D) Consider 1St Reading of Ordinance No. 04 -09, Amending Zoning
Ordinance to Allow Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings
as Conditional Uses in General Business and Limited Business
Zoning Districts, and Amending City Code so that Separation
Distance for Liquor License shall not apply if School or Church
Pg 50 -56
Council Agenda
-3- 7/27/2009
SUMMARY MINUTES
is in Limited Business or General Business Zoning District,
Jeff Smyser
Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by O'Donnell, to
approve 1st reading of Ordinance No. 04 -09 as presented, was
adopted: Yeas, 4; Nays, 1 (Reinert)
E) Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 05 -09, Amending Zoning
Ordinance to Remove the Six -Month Maximum on Extensions
for Submitting the Final Development Plan for a Planned
Unit Development, Jeff Smyser
Action Taken: Motion by O'Donnell, seconded by Gallup, to
approve 1st reading of Ordinance No. 05 -09 as presented, was adopted
Pg 74 -79
F) Consideration of Resolution No. 09 -50, Approving Plans and
Specifications and Authorizing a Request for Quotes, 2009
Surface Water Management Project, Jim Studenski
Action Taken: Motion by Stoltz, seconded by O'Donnell, to
approve Resolution No. 09 -50, was adopted
Pg 80 -82
None
None
4 14
Ar
fie
Community Calendar - A Look Ahead
July 28, 2009 through August 10, 2009
Wednesday, July 29
Monday, August 3
Monday, August 3
Thursday, August 6
Monday, August 10
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
5:30 pm, Community Room
cancelled
7:00 am, Community Room
6:30 pm, Council Chambers
Environmental Board
Council Work Session
Park Board
EDAC
Council Meeting
P1 r-kr, to ut4- -r. 4Q w/ t,1.1(op Ec 1.A (? ciat.. 1/z I. z4d1
Lino Lakes Charter Commission
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Mayor John Bergeson
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
HAND DELIVERED
July 24, 2009
Dear Honorable Mayor Bergeson,
On July 23, 2009, the Lino Lakes Charter Commission voted to develop Charter Amendments for the
November 2009 election. On behalf of the Commission, I formally request additional funding in the
amount of $4,000.00 for 2009, exclusively for legal services pertaining to amending the City Charter.
The primary proposal to be developed would be a Charter amendment that would include a limit on
property tax increases.
Currently, the Commission has less than $21.00 remaining in its budget. This situation occurs
despite letting our regular (professional) minute -taker go, and taking the minutes ourselves.
As you know, the Charter Commission Members do not receive any compensation. The 2009 budget
for the Charter Commission has been sharply reduced by the City Council, from over $7,000 in
recent years to $1,500 for 2009. Our current operating budget is now roughly one -third of the
amount that the City budgeted to the Commission in the 1990's (without factoring for inflation).
During the 2009 budgeting process last fall, upon learning of the proposed budget cut, the
Commission requested that the Council allow sufficient funding for legal services pertaining to an
amendment in its budget. The Council denied that request at that time, while making assurances that
if the Commission needed additional money beyond what was budgeted for 2009, then the money
would be available and could easily be taken from the contingency fund (if the Council so
stipulated).
I respectfully request that this matter be added to the July 27, 2009 Council Work Session and
approved that same day.
Thank you for your consideration and attention to this urgent matter. I apologize for the short notice;
however, the City Council is allowed to make last- minute changes to the existing agenda.
Please let me know if there's anything I can do to assist in this process.
Co ally,
Caroline Dahl
Chair, Lino Lakes Charter Commission
cc: Council member Kathi Gallup
Council member Jeff O'Donnell
Council member Jeff Reinert
Council member Dan Stoltz
City Clerk Julie Bartell
Acting City Administrator Dan Tesch
•
EXPENDITURES
July 27, 2009
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:56:24 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Ranges:
Vendor #: (A)
Invoice #: (A)
Entry Journal #: (R) 8075 - 8090
Trans #: (A)
Line #: (A)
Due Date: (A)
Bank #: (A)
Operator: KKF Page: 1
Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1
Sort: A Check Over Expend: N
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
000020 A 4 L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 2 6.15 6.15 .00 .00
001260 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 1 143.55 143.55 .00 .00
000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 530.68 530.68 .00 .00
000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #5 1 970.62 970.62 .00 .00
000998 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES, INC. 1 100.54 100.54 .00 .DD
001013 ALTERNATOR k STARTER STORE, THE 1 133.91 133.91 .00 .00
000210 AMERICAN FASTENER S. SUPPLY, INC. 1 12.80 12.80 .00 .00
002694 AMERICAN MESSAGING 1 19.11 19.11 .00 .00
000318 AMERIPRIDE LINEN /APPAREL SERVICES, INC. 1 141.96 141.96 .00 .00
004063 ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE BUREAU 2 758.25 758.25 .00 .00
000421 ANOKA CO TREASURER DEPT 1 250.00 250.00 .00 00
000541 ASPEN MILLS, INC. 1 114.89 114.89 .00
007720 BANGERS, TRISH 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00
900471 BONESTROO, INC. 1 9,766.86 9,766.86 .00 .0D
007744 BRADY, ELIZABETH 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
000880 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. 2 1,073.85 1,073.85 .D0 .00
007660 BURNHAM TREE EXPERTS 1 852.00 852.00 .00 .00
000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 45.78 45.78 .00 .00
007388 CAPITAL CITY GLASS, INC. 1 288.23 288.23 .00 .00
001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 .D0 .00
001101 CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 3,220.00 3,220.00 .00 .00
001110 CENTENNIAL UTILITIES 1 1,4B0.50 1,480.50 .00 .00
•
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:56:24 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: iIC' Page: 2
Discount
4 Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
002700 CENTERPOINT /MINNEGASCO, INC. 1 280.85 280.85 .00 .00
004670 COMCAST 1 69.90 69.90 .00 .DD
001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 4,813.58 4,813.58 .00 .00
'900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 2 259.47 259.47 .DO .00
007465 DAVIS EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 1 206.33 206.33 .00 .00
007816 DEE, KEN 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .DD
001298 DEGARDNER, RICK 1 39.05 39.05 .D0 .00
000248 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR /INDUSTRY 1 1,189.49 1,189.49 .00 .00
000947 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS, INC. 1 1,391.91 1,391.91 .00 .DO
001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 69.97 69.97 .00 .00
001148 EGAN OIL COMPANY 2 6,695.37 6,695.37 .00 .00
001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 48.09 48.09 .00 .00
001267 FAST BREAK CORNER MARKET, INC. 1 19.16 19.16 .0D .00
007750 FIRST CALL AUTO PARTS 2 111.59 111.59 .D0 .00
001540 FORESTRY suPPLIERS, INC. 1 73.77 73.77 .00 .00
111559 FRANCIS, LINDA 1 17.60 17.60 .00 .00
01560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 6 57.53 57.53 .00 .DD
007449 FRONTIER PRECISION, INC_ 1 1,385.10 1,385.10 .00 .00
001680 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 1 388.60 38B.60 .00 .00
001605 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC 1 190.00 190.00 .00 .00
000843 HAGER, DALE 1 547.00 547.00 .00 .00
001480 HAWKINS INC. 1 7,320.39 7,320.39 .00 _00
001880 HUGO FEED MILL, INC. 1 11.95 11.95 .00 .00
007224 HUGO MILL 2 52.82 52.82 .00 .00
000905 HYDEN, MICHAEL 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS, INC. 1 740.90 740.90 .0D .00
001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 1,050.00 1,050.00 .00 .00
•
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:56:24 City of Lino Lakes Operator: KIT Page: 3
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Discount
AID
000303 INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC. 1 142.50 142.50 .00 .00
000627 J. P. COOKE COMPANY, INC. 1 42.65 42.65 .00 .00
000828 JASON'S BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 1 130.00 130.00 .00 .00
007817 KAUL, NANCY 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00
001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 358.75 358.75 .00 .D0
007818 KEY TITLE INC 1 3,450.00 3,450.00 .00 .00
000511 LADEN, PERRY 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .D0
007819 LAKE STATE REALTY SERVICES, INC. 1 2,750.00 2,750.00 .00 .00
002270 LAKESIDE COLLISION, INC. 2 1,504.24 1,504.24 .00 .00
002248 LARSON ALLEN, LLP 1 8,200.00 8,200.00 .00 .00
002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 924.00 924.00 .D0 .00
002320 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00
D02420 LINO LAKES SENIOR CENTER 1 701.25 701.25 .00 .00
007820 LOCKWOOD, LINDA 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00
002387 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 26.56 26.56 .00 .00
lib
005007 LINDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1 14,552.75 14,552.75 .00
000274 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY, INC. 1 29.00 29.0D .D0
000177 MAIN FLORAL LTD, INC. 1 38.37 38.37 .00 .00
002550 MENARDS, INC. 1 43.62 43.62 .00 .00
002570 METRO COUNCIL ENRIVONMENTAL SERVICES 1 5,940.00 5,940.00 .D0 .00
002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 605.00 605.00 .00 .00
007694 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 1 52,112.79 52,112.79 .00 .00
002350 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO., INC. 1 589.31 589.31 .00 .00
007688 Minnesota City /County Mgmt Assoc. 1 92.00 92.00 .00 .00
002770 MINNESOTA DEPT OF EMPLOY & ECON DEV 1 13.34 13.34 .D0 .00
003882 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC 1 16.50 16.50 .00 .00
D02931 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER 1 681.40 681.40 .00 .00
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount
•
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:56:25 City of Lino Lakes Operator: KKF Page: 4
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Discount
Odor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost
004604 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1 390.00 390.00 .00 .00
002760 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 6,717.00 6,717.00 .00 .00
000871 MONSON, MIKE 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00
003050 MRPA 1 10.00 10.00 .00 .00
004791 NAC MECHANICAL& FT.RCTRICAL SERVICES 1 1,072.81 1,072.81 .00 .00
000106 NELSON, ROBERT 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .DO
000983 OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICES 1 69.56 69.56 .00 .0D
007821 OSMEK, LARRY 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .D0
003492 PETTY CASH 1 239.76 239.76 .00 .00
000677 PHILIP'S TREE CARE 1 266.25 266.25 .00 .00
003524 PITNEY BOWES, INC. 2 663.00 663.00 .00 .00
004608 POGALZ, BRIAN 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00
000464 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE, INC. 1 246.35 246.35 .00 .00
000057 PREMIUM WATERS, INC. 2 76.28 76.2B .00 .D0
007822 RAINBOW, INC. 1 371.46 371.46 .D0 .00
478 RECREATION, SPORTS & PLAY, INC. 1 600.64 600.64 .00 .00
329 ROLEK, ALAN 1 1,714.85 1,714.85 .00 .0D
004609 ROOT, MICHAEL 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .D0
900491 ROSEVILLE, CITY OF 2 6,720.88 6,720.88 .00 .00
007823 RUSCO, MARSHA 1 80.00 80.00 .00 .00
003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 133.79 133.79 .00 .00
007671 SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERRTY & MOLENDA, 1 8,305.00 8,305.00 .00 .00
003990 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF 1 3,310.30 3,310.30 .00 .00
007824 SIGNATURE LIGHTING, INC. 1 282.60 282.60 .00 .00
003293 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY, INC. 1 1,670.00 1,670.00 .00 .00
000418 SOCCER USA MINNESOTA 1 313.25 313.25 .00 .0D
003260 STANSBERRY, KAY 1 131.08 131.08 .00 .00
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:56:25 City of Lino Lakes Operator: KKF Page: 5
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Discount
Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lo
000365 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE, INC. 1 171.73 171.73 .00 .00
D04192 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 1D0.00 100.00 .00 .00
004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 11 1,463.96 1,463.96 .00 .00
004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 2 2,350.70 2,350.70 .00 .00
000489 TDS METROCOM MN 1 972.66 972.66 .D0 .00
002790 TESSMAN s NU COMPANY, INC. 1 734.85 734.85 .00 .00
004350 TKDA 11 37,549.24 37,549.24 .00 .00
007662 TOUSLEY FORD, INC_ 1 26.45 26.45 .00 .00
002130 TRALLE, PAUL 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .00
D00423 TWIN CITY FAB, INC. 1 50.64 50.64 .0D .00
002839 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 1 10,397.09 10,397.09 .00 .0D
004560 U S BANK 1 7,349.20 7,349.20 .00 .00
004667 VERMEER OF MINNESOTA, INC. 1 305.25 305.25 .00 .00
004730 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER, INC. 1 88.2D 88.20 .00 .00
004127 WEGENER, WAYNE, JR. 1 1,414.34 1,414.34 .00 .00
003250 KCEL ENERGY 9 5,912.78 5,912.78 .00 00
Grand Totals: 164 245,711.08 245,711.08 .00
•
•
Date: 07/22/2009
Account #
•
•
Time: 08:56:25
Description
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Operator: KKF Page: 6
Fiscal Debit
Main
Credit
101 - 2040 -000 GENERAL FUND PAYROLL WITHHOLDING 07/2009 2,576.02
101- 2120 -000 GENERAL FUND SAC PAYABLE 07/2009 6,000.00
101- 2130 -000 GENERAL FUND SURCHARGE PAYABLE 07/2009 1,186.05
101 - 2131 -000 GENERAL FUND Plumbing Surcharge 07/2009 15.50
101 - 2132 -000 GENERAL FUND Merhan; cal Surcharge 07/2009 37.50
101 - 3414 -000 GENERAL FUND SAC/SURCHARGE FEE 07/2009 - 109.56
101 - 3422 -000 GENERAL FUND POLICE OTHER REVENUES 07/2009 3,220.00
101 -372D -000 GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTIONS /DONATIONS 07/2009 2,500.00
101- 401 - 4900 -000 MAYOR /COUNCIL MARKETING & EDUCAT 07/2009 38.37
101 - 402- 4310 -000 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION OTHER CONSULTANT 07/2009 69.56
101 -402- 4410 -000 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED SERVIC 07/2009 143.55
101 -402- 4452 -000 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SUBSCRIPT /DUES 07/2009 92.00
101 -406- 4321 -ODD GENERAL SENIORS TELEPHONE 07/2009 36.34
101- 406 - 4330 -D00 GENERA SENIORS TRAVEL /TUITION 07/2009 701.25
101- 407 -4308 -000 GENERAL FINANCE AUDITOR 07/2009 3,644.29
101 -407- 4310 -000 GENERAL FINANCE OTHER CONSULTANT 07/2D09 11,917.01
101 - 407- 433D -00D GENERAL FINANCE TRAVEL /TUITION 07/2009 1,732.45
101 -407- 4452 -000 GENERAL FINANCE SUBSCRIPTIONS 07/2009 190.00
101- 414 - 4301 -00D GENERAL LEGAL CONSULTANTS MUNICIPAL ATTO 07/2009 8,305.00
101- 415 -4300 -000 ECONOMIC DEV PROFESSIONAL SERVI 07/2009 358.75
101 - 416 - 4330 -000 PLANNING E. ZONING TRAVEL /TUITION 07/2009 84.10
101 -416- 4331 -00D PLANNING & ZONING STIPEND 07/2009 375.00
101- 416 - 4410 -D00 PLANNING F. ZONING CONTRACT SERVICES 07/2009 9,766.86
101 - 417 - 4410 -D00 ENGINEERING CONTRALa.D SERVICES 07/2009 17,091.91
101 - 418 -441D -000 COMM DEV CONTRACTED 07/2009 250.00
101- 42D -420D -000 GENERAL POLICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 07/2009 447.49
101 -420- 4211 -000 GENERAL POLICE MAINTENANCE SDYPLIES 07/2009
CO 29.00
101 -420- 4213 -000 GENERAL POLICE DARE PROGRAM EXPENSES 07/2009 50.68
101- 420 - 4214 -000 GENERAL POLICE CRIME PREVENTION 07/2009 251.15
101 -42D- 4300 -ODD GENERAL POLICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 07/2009 61.64
GE
101 -42D- 4321 -D00 GENERAL POLICE TELEPHONE 07/2009 672.05
101 -42D- 4330 -000 GENERAL POLICE TRAVEL /TUITION 07/2009 2,067.14
101- 420 - 4370 -000 GENERAL POLICE UNIFORMS 07/2009 1,578.85
101 - 420 - 4381 -000 GENERAL POLICE ELECTRICITY 07/2009 21.31
101 -420- 4387 -000 GENERAL POLICE POLICE EXPLORERS 07/2009 30.00
101- 420 -4410 -000 GENERAL POLICE CONTRACTED SERVICES 07/2009 1,170.30
101- 422 - 4304 -D00 GENERAL BUILDING INSPECTIONS MUN ENG 07/2009 278.03
101 -43D- 4223 -D00 GENERAL STREET SIGNS 07GENERAL 69.97
101 -43D- 4224 -000 GENERAL STREETS PATHCHING MATERIALS 07/2009 2,350.70
101 -43D- 4228 -D0D GENERAL STREETS SALT /SAND 07/2009 100.54
101 -430- 4229 -00D GENERAL STREETS GRAVEL /MISC 07/2009 2,316.50
101- 430 - 4321 -000 GENERAL STREETS TELEPHONE 07/2009 40.17
101- 430 - 4385 -D00 GENERAL STREETS STREET LIGHTS 07/2009 1,558.33
101- 430 -4410 -000 GENERAL STREETS CONTRACTED SERVICES 07/2009 852.00
101- 431 - 4212 -000 GENERAL FLEET VEHICLE FUEL 07/2009 6,695.37
101 - 431 - 4221 -D00 GENERAL FLEET SHOP PARTS 07/2009 1,537.22
101- 431 - 4300 -ODD GENERAL FLEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 07/2009 246.35
101- 432 - 4200 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS OFFICE SUPPLIES 07/2009 526.25
101- 432 - 4211 -D00 GOVER BUILDINGS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 07/2009 40.45
101 - 432 -430D -000 GOVER BUILDINGS PROFESS. SERV 07/2009 1,072.81
101- 432 - 4321 -D00 GOVER BUILDINGS TELEPHONE 07/2009 1,140.11
101- 432 - 4361 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS BUILD INS 07/2009 2,004.24
101- 432 - 4370 -000 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS UNIFORMS 07/2009
CO 131.08
_10_
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:56:25 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Account #
Operator: MG' Page: 7
Description Fiscal Debit Credit
101 - 432 - 4381 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS ELECTRICITY 07/2009 6,999.61
101- 432 - 4383 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS HEAT 07/2009 1,522.88
101 - 432 - 4384 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS SANITATION 07/2009 413.31
101 - 432 - 4410 -000 GOVER BUILDINGS CONTRACTED 07/2009 871.60
101 -450- 4211 -000 GENERAL PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 07/2009 1,356.24
101 -450- 4330 -000 GENERAL PARKS TRAVEL, /TUITION 07/2009 39.05
101- 450- 4381 -000 GENERAL PARKS ELECTRICITY 07/2009 7.99
101 -450- 4383 -000 GENERAL PARKS HEAT 07/2009 79.01
101- 450- 4384 -000 GENERAL PARKS SANITATION 07/2009 117.37
101 -45D- 4410 -00D GENERAL PARKS CONTRALthu SERVICES 07/2009 266.25
101- 451- 4141 -000 GENERAL RECREATION REEMPLOYMENT INSURANC 07/2009 13.34
101- 451- 4211 -D0D GENERAL RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 07/2009 150.93
101- 461 - 5000 -000 GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 07/2009 1,385.10
101- 463 - 4240 -000 GENERAL FORESTRY SMALL TOOLS 07/2009 73.77
Find Total: 110,858.13
201 -200- 4308 -000 RECREATION PROGRAM REC AUDITOR 07/2009 71.39
201 - 202 - 4211 -839 RECREATION MAINT SUP- SOFTBALL ADULT SUMM 07/2009 197.57
201- 202- 4211 -840 RECREATION MAINT SUP - SOFTBALL. ADULT FALL 07/2009 97.83
201- 205- 4211 -827 RECREA'T'ION MAINT Suet, GOBBLER GAMES 07/2009 31.20
201 - 207 - 4211 -851 RECREATION MAINT Sure, YOUTH GOLF LESSONS 07/2009 73.10
201 -207- 4211 -880 MAINTENANCE SUPPL HAWKS PROGRAM 07/2009 1,670.00
201 -207- 4211 -883 MAINT SUPPL COUGAR SOCCER CMP 07/2009 313.25
201 -208- 4211 -855 MAINT SUPP YOUTH FALL FOOTBALL 07/2009 2,316.10
201 -208- 4211 -856 RECREA'T'ION MAINT SUPL YOUTH SOCCER 07/2009 4,249.0D
201 - 3810 -806 RECREATION T -BALL 4,5,6 YEAR OLDS 07/2009 65.00
201 -381D -855 RECREATION FOOTBALL SKILL DEVELOPMENT 07/2009 90.00
201- 3810 -856 RECREATION YOUTH SOCCER 07/2009 45.00
201 - 3810 -857 RECREATION SOCCER FU DAMENTAIS 07/2009 30.00
Fund Total: 9,249.44
301- 499 - 4308 -000 CLOSED BOND FUND AUDITOR- CONSULTANTS 07/2009 324.97
Fund Total: 324.97
401- 499 - 4308 -000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AUDITOR 07/2009 467.15
Fund Total: 467.15
402- 431 - 5000 -000 FLEET CAPITITAL OUTLAY 07/2009 305.25
402 - 450 - 5000 -000 PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY 07/2009 418.75
Fund Total: 724.00
406- 499 -4308 -000 AREA AND UNIT OTHER AUDITOR 07/2009 519.38
.0D
.00
.00
.DO
.D0
•
•
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:56:26 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
•
Operator: KKF Page: B
Account # Description Fiscal Debit Credit
Fund Total: 519.38 .00
421 - 499 - 4304 -085 MUNICIPAL ENGINEER 2009 SEAI.COAT 07/2009 4,051.31
421- 499 - 4304 -086 MUNICIPAL ENGINEER 2009 OVERLAY 07/2009 11,060.22
Fund Total: 15,111.53 .00
422 - 499 - 4308 -000 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT AUDITOR 07/2009 62.41
Fiord Total: 62.41 .00
471- 499 -4400 -061 Legacy®Woods Edge Improv OTHER CONTRALTO 07/2009 14,552.75
Fund Total: 14,552.75 .DD
474- 4994 -300 I35E INTERCHANGE 07/2009 2,750.00
Fiord Total: 2,750.00 .0D
601 - 2140 -000
601- 3714 -D0D
601- 3855 -000
601 - 494- 4211 -00D
601- 494 - 4222 -000
601- 494 -430D -000
601- 494 - 4304 -000
601- 494- 4321 -000
601- 494 - 4381 -000
601- 494 - 4382 -D00
601- 494 - 4383 -000
601- 494 - 4410 -000
602 -495- 4211 -ODD
602 - 495- 4221 -000
602- 495- 4300 -000
602 - 495- 4304 -000
602- 495- 4321 -000
602- 495- 4381 -000
602- 495- 4382 -000
602- 495 - 4383 -D0D
602- 495- 4405 -000
602- 495 - 4410 -000
WATER OPERATING STATE WATER CONNECTION F 07/2009 6,726.54
WATER OPERATING MISCELL REVENUE 07/2009 -25.00
WATER OPERATING WATER SALES 07/2009 -3.54
WATER OPERATING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 07/2009 288.23
WATER OPERATING CHEMICALS 07/2009 7,320.39
WATER OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 07/2009 3,494.65
WATER OPERATING MUNICIPAL ENGINEER 07/2009 1,313.29
WATER OPERATING TELEPHONE 07/2009 120.48
WATER OPERATING ELECTRICITY 07/2009 2,050.39
WATER OPERATING UTILITIES 07/2009 2,346.81
WATER OPERATING HEAT 07/2009 145.86
WATER OPERATING CONTRACTED' SERVICE 07/2009 194.30
Fund Total: 23,972.40
SEWER OPERATING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 07/2009 168.04
SEWER OPERATING SHOP PARTS 07/2009 224.19
SEWER OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 07/2009 5,132.92
SEWER OPERATING MUNICIPAL ENGINEER 07/2009 1,313.29
SEWER OPERATING TELEPHONE 07/2009 3.82
SEWER OPERATING ELECTRICITY 07/2009 371.33
SEWER OPERATING ui11,ITIES 07/2009 953.95
SEWER OPERATING HEAT 07/2009 13.60
SEWER OPERATING MWCC SEWER CHARGES 07/2009 52,112.79
SEWER OPERATING CONTRALna) SERVICE 07/2009 194.30
Fund Total: 60,488.23
.00
.00
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:56:26 City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Journal
Account #
Operator: KKF Page: 9
Description Fiscal Debit Credit
801- 2022 -000 CONTRACTOR'S DEPOSITS POLICE FORFEITURES 07/2009 339.50
B01- 2301 -000 CONTRACTOR'S DEP WATER METER DEPOSITS 07/2009 400.00
B01- 2302 -102 CONTRACTOR'S DEPOSITS Vaughan Addn. Engi 07/2009 135.55
801- 2317 -102 The Preserve Engineering 07/2009 475.70
801- 2318 -000 CONTRACTOR'S DEP BUILDING PERMIT DEPOSIT 07/2009 3,450.00
801 - 2331 -102 MARSBAN MEADOWS ENGINEERING 07/2009 406.65
801- 2344 -102 Century Farms No.4th Engineering 07/2009 609.98
B01- 2364 -103 Ad Graphics - Taylor Administration 07/2009 135.55
801- 2376 -102 Grandview Engineer 07/2009 67.78
801 -2388 -102 CONTRACTOR'S DEPOSITS Fax Borough Engine 07/2009 203.33
801- 2394 -102 Pine Glen 2nd Addn. Administration 07/2009 406.65
Fund Total: 6,630.69
Grand Totals: 245,711.08
Control
Control Grand Totals: .0D
A/P
.00
.00
.00
101 -202D -000 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 07/2009 110,858.13
201 -202D -000 RECREATION ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 07/2009 9,249.44
301 - 2020 -000 CLOSED BOND FUND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 07/2009 324.97
401 - 2020 -000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ACCOUNTS PA 07/2009 467.15
402 - 2020 -000 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REVOLVING ACCTS PAY 07/2009 724.00
406 -202D -000 AREA AND UNIT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 07/2009 519.3B
421 - 2020 -D0D SEAL COATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 07/2009 15,111.53
422 - 2020 -D00 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTS PAYABL 07/2009 62.41
471 -202D -000 Legacy®Woods Edge Impry ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 07/2009 14,552.75
474 - 2020 -000 135E INTERCHANGE ACCTS PAY 07/2009 2,750.00
601- 2020 -000 WATER OPERATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 07/2009 23,972.40
602 - 2020 -000 SEWER OPERATING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 07/2009 60,488.23
801 - 2020 -000 CONTRACTOR'S DEPOSITS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 07/2009 6,630.69
A/P Grand Totals: .00 245,711.08
Discount
Manual Checks - Cash
Discount Grand Totals:
-13-
Cash Grand Totals:
.00 .0D
.D0 .00
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:58:30
•
Ranges:
Operator: KKF
Page: 1
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Fund:
Dept Id:
Program:
Vendor #:
Invoice #:
Schedule Journal #:
Bank #:
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(A)
(R) 8076 8096
(A)
Options: Print Ranges /Options: Y # of copies: 1
Page on Department: N
Department
Vendor Name Description
Amount
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR/ 2ND QTR 2009 BLDG PERMIT
AFSCME COUNCIL #5 UNION DUES
CENTENNIAL FIRE DIST LEX SAFETY CAMP FIREMANS
CENTENNIAL LAKES POL MAY 09 EAGLEBROOK OT
LAW ENFORCEMENT LABO UNION DUES
METRO COUNCIL ENVIRO SAC ACTIVITY SUMMARY REP
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAY BRIAN C HRONSKI ID 00140
Total for Department
MAYOR /COUNCIL MAIN FLORAL LTD, INC GREEN PLANT /HILLESHEIM F
Total for Department 401
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ORS
4111FL
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
FINANCE
OPTUMEEALTH FINANCIA JUNE ELIGIBLE PLAN PARTI
ACCLAIM BENEFITS MONTHLY FSA ACCOUNT PART
Minnesota City /Count MEMBERSHIP FEES
Total for Department 402
TDS METROCOM MN MONTHLY PHONE
LINO LAKES SENIOR CE REIMBURSE BUS
Total for Department 406
ROLEK, ALAN
FRANCIS, LINDA
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
LARSON ALLEN, LIP
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES
ROSRViLLE, CITY OF
SVC
USAGE
TRAVEL /MEETING EKPENDITU
ROSEVILLE USER GROUP TRA
0 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWA
2008 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
JULY 2009 JOINT POWERS
Total for Department 407
LEGAL CONSULTANTS SEVERSON, SHELDON, D INVESTIGATION /CHARTER CO
Total for Department 414
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, I -35 4 MAIN ST INTERCHAN
Total for Department 415
PLANNING & ZONING
PLANNING & ZONING
PLANNING 4 ZONING
PLANNING & ZONING
PLANNING & ZONING
•
NELSON, ROBERT
LADEN, PERRY
HYDEN, MICHAEL
TROT. E, PAUL
U S BANK
P 9, Z BOARD MEMBER STIPE
P E Z BOARD MEMBER STIPE
P & Z BOARD MEMBER STIPE
P 4 Z BOARD MEMBER STIPE
MONTHLY CHARGES
1,189.49
970.62
2,500.00
3,220.00
924.00
5,940.00
681.4D
15,425.51*
38.37
38.37*
69.56
143.55
92.00
305.11*
36.34
701.25
737.59*
1,714.85
17.60
190.0D
3,644.29
6,147.43
5,769.58
17,483.75*
8,305.00
8,305.00*
358.75
356.75*
50.0D
50.00
50.00
75.00
8.10
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:58:30
Department
Operator: KKF
Page: 2
City of T,inn Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name
Description
Amount
PLANNING 4 ZONING
PLANNING 4 ZONING
PLANNING 4 ZONING
PLANNING & ZONING
PLANNING & ZONING
ENGINEERING
COMM DEV
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLI CE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLI CE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLI CE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLI CE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
POLICE
U S BANK
POGALZ, BRIAN
ROOT, MICHAEL
BRADY, ELIZABETH
BONESTROO, INC.
TRDA
SENSIBLE LAND USE
P 6 Z BOARD MEMBER STIPE
P 4 Z BOARD MEMBER STIPE
P & Z BOARD MEMBER STIPE
COMP PLAN UPDATE
Total for Department 416
2009 GEN FUND ENG SVCS
Total for Department 417
ANOKA COUNTY TREASUR ANNUAL RENEWAL OF GIS DA
Total for Department 418
PREMIUM WATERS, INC.
LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY,
STAPLES BUSINESS ADV
TDS METROCOM MN
ASPEN MILLS, INC.
JASON BOBBY & STEVE'
HAGER, DALE
MONSON, MIKE
CONNEXUS ENERGY
FAST BREAK CORNER MA
METRO SALES INCORPOR
PETTY CASH /LLPD
PETTY CASH /LLPD
Pt.t 1 Y CASH /LLPD
PETTY CASH /LLPD
PETTY CASH /LLPD
PETTY CASH /LLPD
PETTY CASH /LLPD
SAM'S CLUB, INC.
WEGENER, WAYNE, JR.
STRETCHER'S, INC.
STRETCHER'S, INC.
STRETCHER'S, INC.
STRETCHER'S,
STRETCHER'S,
STRETCHER's,
STREICHER'S,
STRETCHER'S,
STRETCHER'S,
U S BANK
U S BANK
U S BANK
INC.
INC.
INC.
INC.
INC.
INC.
MONTHLY WATER PURCHASE
LBLSK 1.5%1.5 RED LF B10
PRINT CARTRIDGES
MONTHLY PHONE SVC
P NOLL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
CAR WASHES
K9 USPCA DOES /REGIONAL.&
FUEL IN VAN FOR EXPLORER
MONTHLY ENERGY USAGE
CAR WASHES
QUARTERLY BILLING
ANOKA CHIEFS
COMPLIANCE CHECK
FRIENDS 6 FITNESS
PICA
PSCC INTERVIEWS
SENIOR SAFETY FAIR
TRAINING
LLPD OFFICE SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION CLASS
A HALVERSON UNIFORM ALTO
C BOEHME UNIFORM ALLOWAN
C SCHIRMERS UNIFORM ALLO
P NOLL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
RESERVE OFFICERS UNIFORM
T NOLL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
✓ KLOSNER UNIFORM ALLOWA
W OWENS UNIFORM ALLOWANC
W WEGENER UNIFORM ALLOWA
CSAPiATNS
DARE GRADUATION
LLPD TRAINING
U S BANK MONTHLY CHARGES
MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SA 2ND QTR 2009 CJDN
CORPORATE EXPRESS, I MDR CLIPS /POSTIT /SEARPI
CORPORATE EXPRESS, I PRINT CRTG
Total for Department 420
76.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
9,766.86
10,225.96*
17,091.91
17,091.91*
250.00
250.00*
26.14
29.00
171.73
672.05
114.89
130.00
547.00
30.0D
21.31
19.16
605.00
46.00
15.64
62.07
44.69
32.00
21.31
18.05
16.29
1,414.34
15.96
53.82
105.32
55.37
150.42
173.21
288.57
589.35
31.94
82.97
42.58
79.64
24.32
390.00
115.69
143.78
6,379.61*
-15-
•
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:58:30 Operator: KKF
•
Department
Page: 3
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name Description
Amount
BUILDING INSPECTIONS TKDA 2009 GEN FUND ENG SVCS
Total for Department 422
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
IIIIIii
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
FLEET
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
•
A E L SUPERIOR SOD C ROILS OF SOD
TDS METROCOM MN MONTHLY PHONE SVC
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, CLASS 5
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 5G WHITE HIGH BUILD DURA
AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES CONCRETE SAND
CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY ENERGY USAGE
EARL ANDERSON ASSOCI 9' STREET SIGN PLATES
FRATTA.LONE'S HARDWA FASTENERS
FRATTAILONE'S HARDWA FASTENERS /REDWOOD STAIN
MENARDS, INC. MAIL BO% REPAIR
AMERICAN MESSAGING PAGER USAGE
XCEL ENERGY ENERGY USAGE
T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SO AC MODIFIED ASPHALT
BURNHAM TREE EXPERTS REMOVE & HAUL TREE /GRIND
SIGNATURE LIGHTING, STREETLIGHT REPAIRS /CITY
Total for Department 430
AMERICAN FASTENER & HEX CAP /NUTS /WASHERS
POMP'S TIRE SERVICE, OFF RD SVC CALL /FLAT REP
ALTERNATOR F STARTER REPLACE CLUTCH PULLEY /SQ
EGAN OIL COMPANY ULSD #2 DYED
EGAN OIL COMPANY UNL GAS
EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE MAPLIGHT TOP EXIT W /WIRE
MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SU REPAIR KIT /PISTON ROD /PU
LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, CABLE-THROTTLE
STATE OF MINNESOTA EPCRA PROGRAM
U S BANK 30RAPER- 1200MM
U S BANK MONTHLY CHARGES
HUGO MILL D/D AIR FILTER
HUGO MILL VALVE -DRAIN OIL
DAVIS EQUIPMENT CORP PTO 1/2 MAL /F S /BOLT KIT
TOUSLEY FORD, INC. TRANSMITTE
FIRST CALL AUTO PART FUEL /OIL /AIR FILTERS
FIRST CALL AUTO PART NEW WTR PUMP
Total for Department 431
PREMIUM WATERS, INC.
ACE SOLID WASTE, INC
AMER/PRIDE LINEN /APP
TDS METROCOM MN
J. P. COOKE COMPANY,
C. P. OFFICE PRODUCT
CENTENNIAL UTILITIES
CONNEXUS ENERGY
LAKESIDE COLLISION,
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS
MONTHLY SERVICE
MONTHLY RUBBISH REMOVAL
MONTHLY REPLACEMENT OF R
MONTHLY PHONE SVC
CUSTOM %STAMPER - CITY 0
CHAIR MAT
GAS USAGE
MONTHLY ENERGY USAGE
K9 UNIT #362 CLAIM
CL#11061618 - 07/19/09 D
1187 MAIN ST GAS USAGE
278.03
278.03*
3.07
36.34
849.66
1,391.91
100.54
1,103.37
69.97
5.42
22.82
43.62
3.83
172.36
2,350.7D
852.00
282.60
7,288.21*
7.17
246.35
133.91
2,315.57
4,379.BD
48.09
589.31
26.56
25.00
301.89
8.10
35.28
17.54
206.33
26.45
49.15
62.44
8,478.94*
5D.14
413.31
141.96
118.91
42.65
45.7B
1,429.51
1,428.94
1,504.24
500.00
44.32
Date: 07/22/2009
Department
Time: 08:58:3D Operator: KKF
Page: 4
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name Description
Amount
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CENTERPOINT /MIINNEGAS 1189 MAIN 6T (2) GAS USA
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS 1189 MAIN ST GAS USAGE
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS SCEL ENERGY ENERGY USAGE
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS STANSBERRY, KAY K STANSBERRY CLOTHING AL
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PITNEY BOWES, INC. SERVICES CHARGES
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS MINNESOTA SHREDDING DOCUMENT SHREDDING
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS SAM'S CLUB, INC. BREAK ROOM SUPPLIES
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS U S HANK MONTHLY CHARGES
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS U S BANK OMNIPAGE PRO 17 UPGRADE
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS U 6 BANK PAINT BRUSHES /FAN /KILZ
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS U S BANK UPS FOR SERVERS
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS COMCAST INTERNET & IP ADDRESS SV
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS NAC MECHANICAL& ELEC SERVICE CONDENSING UNIT
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS ROSEVILLE, CITY OF JULY 09 PHONE BILL
Total for Department 432
PARKS
PARRS
PARKS
PARRS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
RECR EATI ON
RECREATION
RECREATION
ENVIRONMENTAL
FORESTRY
ACE SOLID WASTE, INC MONTHLY RUBBISH REMOVAL
PHILIP'S TREE CARE APPLICATION OF BROADLEAF
CENTENNIAL UTILITIES GAS USAGE
CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY ENERGY USAGE
DEGARDNER, RICK MILEAGE
FRATPALLONE'S HARDWA LAWNMOWER OIL
FRATrALLONE•S HARDWA TERRO ANT KILLER
FRATrALrONR'S HARDWA WASP & HORNET ACE
CENTERPOINT /MIN EGAS 1179 MAIN ST GAS USAGE
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS 6520 PHEASANT RUN GAS US
TESSMAN SEED COMPANY ATHIETIC TWO MIX
RECREATION, SPORTS & LACROSSE NETS /PAIR
Total for Department 450
MINNESOTA DEPT OF EM 2ND QTR UNEMPLOYMENT
U S BANK
U S BANK
Total for
FRONTIER PRECISION,
Total for
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS,
Total for
MONTHLY CHARGES
PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES
Department 451
TRTIABLE TERRASYNC /PATBFFI
Department 461
ORANGE WET COAT AEROSOL
Department 463
Total for Fund 101
BANGERT, TRISH
DEE, KEN
KAUL, NANCY
LOCKWOOD, LINDA
OSMEK, LARRY
R.USCO, MARSHA
Total for
WITHDREW FROM SOCCER
REGISTRATION
CLASS CANCELLED
CANCELLED CLASS
WITHDREW FROM SOCCER
WITHDREW FROM FOOTBALL
Department
32.49
16.56
5,570.67
131.08
663.00
16.50
117.50
24.30
117.36
32.35
186.76
69.90
1,072.81
951.30
14,722.34*
117.37
266.25
37.39
7.99
39.05
7.98
6.40
6.37
26.41
15.21
734.85
600.64
1,865.91*
13.34
8.10
142.83
164.27*
1,385.10
1,385.10*
73.77
73.77*
110,858.13*
30.00
10.00
30.00
35.00
45.0D
80.00
230.00*
_17_
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:58:30 Operator: KKF
•
Page: 5
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
PROGRAM REC LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2008 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL 71.39
Total for Department 200 71.39*
ADULT SPORTS MRPA TOURNAMENT FEE 10.00
ADULT SPORTS U S BANK FREIGHT CHARGES 269.2D
ADULT SPORTS U S BANK MONTHLY CHARGES 16.20
Total for Department 202 295.40*
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK MONTHLY CHARGES 8.10
SPECIAL EVENTS /TRIPS U S BANK PAINT BRUSHES /FAN /KILZ 23.10
Total for Department 205 31.20*
YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL SOCCER USA MINNESOTA INK /ART WORK CHARGES 313.25
YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACRD RICE LAKE ELEM SCHOOL 1,670.00
YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL U S BANK GOLF 65.00
YOUTH INSTRUCTIONAL U S BANK MONTHLY CHARGES 8.10
Total for Department 207 2,056.35*
YOUTH SPORTS IMAGE PRINTING & GRA POCKET FOLDERS 740.9D
YOUTH SPORTS U S BANK CINCH SACKS 5,808.00
YOUTH SPORTS U S BANK MONTHLY CHARGES 16.20
Total for Department 208 6,565.10*
Total for Fund 201 9,249.44*
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2008 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL 324.97
Total for Department 499 324.97*
Total for Find 301 324.97*
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2008 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL 467.15
Total for Department 499 467.15*
Total for Fund 401 467.15*
FLEET VERMEER OF MINNESOTA SCREW- HCS,BINS /FILTER /OI 305.25
Total for Department 431 305.25*
PARKS ANOKA COUNTY LICENSE NEW TRAILER 418.75
Total for Department 450 418.75*
Total for Fund 402 724.00*
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2008 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL 519.38
Total for Department 499 519.38*
Total for Fund 406 519.38*
OTHER TKDA 2009 OVERLAY PROJECT 11,060.22
OTHER TKDA 2009 SEALCOAT PROJECT 4,051.31
•
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:58:30 Operator: KKF
Department
Page: 6
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name Description
Total for Department 499
Total for Fund 421
OTHER LARSON ALLEN, LLP 2008 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL
Total for Department 499
Total for Fund 422
OTHER LUNDA CONSTRUCTION C LAKE DRIVE /355 INTERCHAN
Total for Department 499
Total for Fund 471
LAKE STATE REALTY SE SPECIAL ASSESS PROD /EXIT
Total for Department
Total for Fund 474
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
MN. DEPT OF HEALTH
SHOREVIEW, CITY OF
RAINBOW, INC.
COMM WATER SUPPLY SVC CO
METER USAGE CHARGES
HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT
Total for Department
INSTRUMENTAL RESEARC
TDS METROCOM MN
CONNEXUS ENERGY
HAWKINS , INC.
GOPHER STATE ONE CAL
LARSON ALLEN, LLP
AMERICAN MESSAGING
CEN ERPOINT /MINNEGAS
CENTERPOINT /MINNEGAS
cI TERPOINT /MINNEGAS
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES
XCEL ENERGY
SHOREVIEW, CITY OF
STATE OF MINNESOTA
TKDA
CAPITAL CITY GLASS,
Total for
TOTAL COLIFORM BACTERIA
MONTHLY PHONE SVC
MONTHLY ENERGY USAGE
LPC -5 /HYDRO ACID /CHLORIN
268 LOCATES
2008 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL
PAGER USAGE
1180 BIRCH ST GAS USAGE
6774 BLACK DUCK GAS USAG
6786 CLEARWATER CREEK GA
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
ENERGY USAGE
METER USAGE CHARGES
EPCRA PROGRAM
2009 GEN FUND ENG SVCS
CLEAR POLYCARBONATE
Department 494
Total for Find 601
A & L SUPERIOR SOD C
AMERICAN FASTENER 4
TWIN CITY FAB, INC.
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS,
CENTENNIAL UTILITIES
CONNEXUS ENERGY
2 ROLL SOD
HEX CAP /NUTS /WASHERS
14 GA MESH
CLASS 5
GAS USAGE
MONTHLY ENERGY USAGE
Amount
15,111.53*
15,111.53*
62.41
62.41*
62.41*
14,552.75
14,552.75*
14,552.75*
2,750.00
2,750.00*
2,750.00*
6,717.00
9.54
-28.54
6,698.00*
142.50
109.02
1,880.64
7,320.39
194.30
1,152.32
11.46
10.48
65.12
70.26
2,124.83
169.75
2,346.81
75.00
1,313.29
288.23
17,274.40*
23,972.40*
3.DB
5.63
50.64
224.19
13.60
371.33
•
•
Date: 07/22/2009 Time: 08:58:30
•
Department
Operator: REF
Page: 7
City of Lino Lakes
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Vendor Name
Description
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
SEWER
•
•
FRATTALLONE'S HARDWA
GOPHER STATE ONE CAL
HUGO NL1:1.) MILL, INC.
INFRATECH TECHNOLOGI
LARSON ALLEN, LIP
AMERICAN MESSAGING
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES
SHOREVIEW, CITY OF
TKDA
VIKING INDUSTRIAL CE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Total for
ANOKA
ANOKA
ANOKA
ANOKA
ANOKA
TKDA
TKDA
TKDA
TKDA
TKDA
TKDA
TKDA
TKDA
KEY TITLE INC
RAINBOW, INC.
Total
PVC CAP
268 LOCATES
GREAT STUr't,
CLEAN & VAC LIFT STATION
2008 AUDIT PROGRESS BILL
PAGER USAGE
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
METER USAGE CHARGES
2009 GEN FUND ENG SVCS
N-DEX PLUS B MIL HD DISP
MONTHLY WASTEWATER SVC
Department 495
Total for Fund 602
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
COUNTY
LICENSE
LICENSE
LICENSE
LICENSE
LICENSE
1990 VOLVO
1996 FORD THUNDERBIRD
2000 DODGE
2002 MERCURY
2002 PONTIAC
AD GRAPHICS-06/09
CEN FARMS NO -4TH ADDN -06
FOXBOROUGH -6/09
GRANDVIEW -06/09
MARSHAN MEADOWS -06/09
PINE GLEN PHASE 2 -06/09
THE PRESERVE -06/09
VAUGHAN ADDN -6/09
6192 LINDA LN PERMIT REF
HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT
for Department
Total for Fund 801
Grand Total
Amount
8.54
194.30
11.95
1,050.00
1,958.09
3.82
2,124.83
953.95
1,313.29
88.20
52,112.79
60,488.23*
60,488.23*
22.00
22.0D
22.00
251.50
22.00
135.55
609.98
203.33
67.78
406.65
406.65
475.70
135.55
3,450.00
400.00
6,630.69*
6,630.69*
245,711.0B*
•
•
•
CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT
Check Register - FIRE GL Page: 1
Check Issue Dates: 7/2/2009 - 7/22/2009 Jul 22, 2009 11:48AM
Report Criteria:
Report type: Summary
GL Check Check Vendor
Period Issue Date Number Number
Payee
Description
07/09 07/07/2009 3856 50200
07/09 07/22/2009 3857 11565
07/09 07/22/2009 3858 20390
07/09 07/22/2009 3859 30480
07/09 07/22/2009 3860 31008
07/09 07/22/2009 3861 31137
07/09 07/22/2009 3862 40010
07/09 07222009 3863 40040
07/09 07/22/2009 3864 50120
07/09 0722/2009 3865 120450
07/09 07/22/2009 3866 130205
07/09 07/22/2009 3867 130440
07/09 07/22/2009 3868 140450
07/09 07/22/2009 3869 150140
07/09 0722/2009 3870 160550
07/09 07/22/2009 3871 210232
07/09 07/22/2009 3872 220200
07/09 07/22/2009 3873 240100
Grand Totals:
EM CONTRACTING
ASPEN MILLS
BROADWAY AWARDS, IN
CENTENNIAL UTILITIES
COMCAST
CONNEXUS ENERGY
DALCO
DEEP ROCK WATER CO
EMERGENCY APPARATU
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MMKR, INC
METRO FIRE, INC
NORTH MEMORIAL MEDI
OFFICE DEPOT, INC
PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER
UNI- SELECT
VERIZON WIRELESS
XCEL ENERGY
ROOF REPAIR 2008 STORM DA
UNIFORM
SAFETY CAMP AWARDS
STATION 1 UTILITIES
INTERNET STATION 1
ELECTRIC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
BOTTLED WATER
TANKER 31
JUNE REIMBURSEMENTS
FINAL 2008 AUDIT BILLING
FIREFIGHTER GLOVES
OXYGEN TANKS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FLASHLIGHT
VEH PARTS
CELL PHONES
ELECTRIC STATION 2
Check
Amount
4,444.75
199.90
894.60
9729
283.00
465.78
303.61
18.79
445.63
19,930.32
4,865.00
381.51
500.00
84.73
86.68
23.04
202.09
540.30
33,767.02
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
•
•
•
SPECIALCOUNCIL MEETING July 6, 2009
DRAFT
1
2 CITY OF LINO LAKES
3 MINUTES
4 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
5
6 DATE : July 6, 2009
7 TIME STARTED : 5:35 p.m.
8 TIME ENDED : 6:08 p.m.
9 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Members Reinert, Stoltz,
10 Gallup, O'Donnell and Mayor Bergeson
11 MEMBERS ABSENT : none
12
13 Also Present Acting City Administrator Dan Tesch; Community Development Director
14 Michael Grochala; Public Safety Director Dave Pecchia; Economic Development
15 Coordinator Mary Alice Divine; City Engineer Jim Studenski; Director of Finance Al
16 Rolek; City Planner Jeff Smyser, City Clerk Julie Bartell
17
18 Mayor Bergeson called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. in the Community Room at Lino
19 Lakes City HalL
20
21 The only agenda item was consideration of Resolution No. 09-43, accepting a feasibility
22 report on improvements and calling for a hearing on improvements to the I- 35E/County
23 State Aid Highway (CSAH) 14 interchange. The feasibility report was distributed at the
24 beginning of the meeting.
25
26 Community Development Director Grochala explained that a feasibility report for this
27 project was authorized by the council in April of 2009. The improvements to the
28 interchange of I- 35E/CSAH 14 and estimated project cost were reviewed. The project, as
29 proposed, would involve some assessment to benefiting property owners.
30
31 Craig Vaughn, SRF Consulting Group, Inc., reviewed the feasibility study.
32
33 Two stakeholder meetings were held in May and June at which the proposed project was
34 presented_
35
36 Staff is recommending that the council accept the feasibility study and set a public
37 hearing on the subject for July 27, 2009. It was confirmed that passage of the resolution
38 would not represent agreement to the project or to everything in the feasibility study.
39
40 The council reviewed the project cost estimate. Staff explained that the city (local)
41 funding is not budgeted or available but they will be looking at alternative funding
42 sources.
43
44 Council Member Reinert moved to approve Resolution No. 09-43 as presented. Council
45 Member Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried.
SPECIALCOUNCIL MEETING July 6, 2009
DRAFT
1
2 The meeting was adjoumed at 6:08 p.m.
3
4 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on
5 July 27, 2009.
6
7
8
9
10 City Clerk, Julianne Bartell John Bergeson, Mayor
2
-23-
•
•
•
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES July 13, 2009
DRAFT
1
2
3 CITY OF LINO LAKES
4 MINUTES
5 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
6
7
8 DATE : July 13, 2009
9 TIME STARTED : 6:35 p.m.
10 TIME ENDED : 7:00 p.m.
11 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Members Gallup, Reinert, O'Donnell,
12 Stoltz and Mayor Bergeson
13 MEMBERS ABSENT : none
14
15 Staff members present: Director of Administration, Dan Tesch; City Attorney, Joseph Langel;
16 Director of Community Development, Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; Economic
17 Development Coordinator, Mary Alice Divine; Public Safety Director, Dave Pecchia;
18 City Clerk, Julie Bartell.
19
20 PUBLIC COMMENT/OPEN MIKE
21
22 There was no public comment.
23
24 SETTING THE AGENDA
25
26 The agenda was approved as presented.
27
28 CONSENT AGENDA
29
30 Council Member Stoltz moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Council Member O'Donnell
31 seconded the motion. Motion carried.
32
33 ITEM ACTION
34
35 1A. Consideration of Expenditures:
36 i) July 13, 2009 (Check No. 85982 through 86251), $441,334.64; Approved
37 ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 3840 through 3855),
38 $13,29431 Approved
39
40 1B. Consider not waiving monetary limits on tort liability per Minnesota
41 Statutes, Section 466.04 Approved
42
43 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK
44
45 There was no report from the Finance Department.
COUNCIL MINUTES July 13, 2009
DRAFT
46
47 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH
48
49 3A. 2009 Blue Heron Days Festival
50
51 L Liability insurance for certain Blue Heron Days events
52
53 Economic Development Coordinator Divine reviewed the events planned for this year's Blue
54 Heron Days festival to be held the weekend of August 22 -23, 2009. The matter of who will carry
55 insurance for those festival events that don't have individually insured sponsors (the parade,
56 medallion hunt, bike rodeo, commerce and crafts fair and ambassador's program) is before the
57 council. It was determined in 2008 that the city's insurance coverage through the League of
58 Minnesota Cities (LMC) does not exclude these activities but the LMC would expect the city to
59 assume the coverage by a motion.
60
61 Council Member Reinert moved to confirm the city's liability coverage as presented. Council
62 Member Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried.
63
64 iL Use of certain city -owned property for Blue Heron Days events
65
66 Economic Development Coordinator Divine reviewed the list of festival events that would
67 involve city -owned property and again noted the insurance coverage for events that is afforded
68 through the League of Minnesota Cities. Staff is requesting that the council authorize the use of
69 city property.
70
71 Council Member O'Donnell moved to grant permission for the use of city property as requested.
72 Council Member Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried.
73
74 iii. Consideration of Resolution No. 09-42, approving a special event and parade
75 permit for the 2009 Blue Heron Days festival
76
77 City Clerk Bartell reported that a special event and parade permit has been requested for the Blue
78 Heron Days festivaL The permit system gives the city an opportunity to review safety and other
79 considerations. Staff including police and fire, have reviewed the applications and have signed
80 off on the permits with the understanding that the applicants will continue to follow their
81 instructions on safety, signage and parking up to and through the festival Staff is recommending
82 approval of a special event and parade permit for this year's Blue Heron Days community
83 festivaL
84
85 Council Member Reinert moved to approve Resolution No. 09-42 as presented. Council Member
86 Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried.
87
88 3B. Consideration of Resolution No. 09-41, approving a special event permit and 1-4 day
89 temporary on -sale liquor license for American Legion Post 566 Blue Heron Days
90 Family Picnic on August 22 & 23, 2009
2
—25—
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES July 13, 2009
DRAFT
• 91 City Clerk Bartell reported that as part of Blue Heron Days, American Legion Post 566 has
92 scheduled a special event for Saturday and Sunday, August 22 and 23. The event plans include a
93 pig roast, corn feed, horseshoe tournament, and music. The Legion would like to fence off a
94 portion of their property to be used for picnic festivities for these two days only. The Minnesota
95 Alcohol Enforcement Division requires a Temporary On -Sale Liquor License to allow the
96 consumption of alcohol in this outdoor area. The Legion has submitted an application for both a
97 special event permit and temporary liquor license. The applications have been reviewed by staff,
98 including the police and fire departments and the applicant has agreed to comply with safety
99 conditions and to address any other considerations that may arise. Therefore, staff is presenting for
100 city council consideration a resolution authorizing the issuance of a special event permit and
101 temporary liquor license to American Legion Post 566.
102
103 Council Member Reinert moved to approve Resolution No. 09-41 as presented. Council
104 Member Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried.
105
106 3C. Consideration of Resolution No. 09-46, approving a special event permit for
107 Miller's on Main annual musicltent event to be held on August 21 and 22, 2009
108
109 City Clerk Bartell reported that Chad Wagner, owner of Miller's on Main has applied to the City
110 for permission to conduct a music event on August 21 and 22. Mr. Wagner is requesting
111 a special event permit. Staf fhas been working with him to ensure that the event is planned to
112 comply with appropriate regulations, including public safety requirements and a list of
113 conditions has been developed and are set forth as an attachment to the resolution before the
114 council Mr. Wagner has obtained a lease agreement for property adjoining the site of the event
115 thus allowing him to meet the set back requirements for a tent.
116
117 Council Member Reinrt moved to approve Resolution No. 09-46 as presented. Council Member
118 Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried.
119
120 3D. Consideration of Resolution No. 09-44, authorizing issuance of a 1-4 day temporary
121 liquor license to American Legion Post 566 for a horseshoe tournament on July 25,
122 2009
123
124 City Clerk Bartell reported that American Legion Post 566 has submitted an application for
125 a temporary on -sale liquor license to allow their patrons to consume on their property but outside
126 their building as part of a horseshoe tournament scheduled for July 25, from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m.
127 Their application has been reviewed by staff and the applicant has responded to the city's
128 requirements. A resolution authorizing the issuance of a one -day temporary license
129 is before the council for consideration
130
131 Council Member Gallup moved to approve Resolution No. 09-44 as presented_ Council Member
132 O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried_
133
134 3E. Consideration of an Agreement with the Centennial School District for a Two-Year
135 Extension for the Operation of the Early Childhood Center
COUNCIL MINUTES July 13, 2009
DRAFT
136
137 Administrator Tesch reported that the ten -year lease between Centennial School District and the
138 city for space for their early childhood center is expiring. Staff has negotiated a two -year
139 extension to the lease, incbiding an amendment to include HVAC costs. Staff recommends
140 approval of the lease agreement
141
142 Council Member Gallup moved to approve the agreement with Centennial School District as
143 presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried.
144
145 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA
146
147 There was no report from the Public Safety Department.
148
149 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER
150
151 There was no report from the Public Services Department.
152
153 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA
154
155 6A. Consideration of Resolution No. 09 -45, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and
156 Specifications, 2009 Surface Water Management Project
157
158 City Engineer Studenski reported that the city annually implements a surface water management
159 project to review twenty percent of the city's outfa1_ls, sediment basins, storm sewers and ponds
160 as a maintenance effort to comply with NPDES requirements and to ensure effectiveness. A map
161 showing the area's that have been completed was reviewed_ Staff is requesting that the council
162 authorize the preparation of plans and specifications for this year's project.
163
164 Council Member Stoltz moved to approve Resolution No. 09-45 as presented. Council Member
165 Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried.
166
167 6B. Consideration of Resolution No. 09-47, Authorizing Preparation of Feasibility
168 Study, Pine Street Paving Improvement Project
169
170 City Engineer Studenski explained that the resolution before the council authorizes preparation
171 of a feasibility study for the paving of Pine Street from Main Street to its western terminus. This
172 is a joint gravel road shared by the cities of Lino Lakes and Columbus. The council has received
173 a petition from residents and has determined there is interest to merit going forward with a
174 feasibility study. Cost, schedule and assessments would be laid out in study. This project would
175 be one- hundred percent assessed to residents. The city of Columbus has submitted a letter
176 indicating their cooperation and support and that they will be splitting the costs with the city.
177 There will be separate reports in respect of the differing improvement processes for the cities.
178 Staff is recommending approval of the resolution.
179
180 A resident asked why there is no cost participation in the street work by the city, state or county
4
_27_
•
•
• 181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
Aik 202
lip 203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
•225
226
COUNCIL MINUTES July 13, 2009
DRAFT
especially since the cost of maintaining a dirt road is very high and improvements would be
beneficial all around. The mayor explained that the city charter doesn't allow city participation
without a referendum.
Another resident asked for confirmation that the Columbus residents are on board. City
Engineer Studenski stated that there is definitely support and the council there also supports the
project.
A council member confirmed that there was previous discussion about how the cost of the study
could be split to reflect the 4th Avenue split in interest. Engineer Studenski confirmed that that
concern is addressed in the report.
Council Member Reinert moved to approve Resolution No. 09-47 as presented. Council
Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business.
NEW BUSINESS
8A. Approval of June 22, 2009 City Council Meeting Minutes
Council Member Gallup moved to approve the June 22, 2009 City Council Meeting Minutes as
presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried. Council Member
Stoltz abstained from voting
8B. Approval of June 22, 2009 Council Work Session Minutes
Council Member Gallup moved to approve the June 22, 2009 Council Work Session Minutes as
presented. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried. Council Member
Stoltz abstained from voting.
There being no further business, Council Member O'Donnell moved to adjourn at 7:00 p.m.
Council Member Stoltz seconded the motion. Motion carried.
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular City Council Meeting on July 27,
2009.
is Thursday, July 16
4 Monday, July 27
4 Monday, July 27
Community Calendar - A Look Ahead
July 14, 2009 through July 27, 2009
7:00 am, Community Room Joint Meeting with EDAC
5:30 pm, Council Workroom Council Work Session
6:30 pm, Council Chambers Council Meeting
5
-28-
227
228
229
230
COUNCIL MINUTES July 13, 2009
DRAFT
•
231 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
232
•
•
6
-29-
•
•
•
SPECIAL WORK SESSION July 13, 2009
DRAFT
1
2 CITY OF LINO LAKES
3 MINUTES
4 SPECIAL WORK SESSION
5
6 DATE : July 13, 2009
7 TIME STARTED : 6:05 p.m.
8 TIME ENDED : 6:30 p.m.
9 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Members Reinert, Stoltz,
10 Gallup, O'Donnell and Mayor Bergeson
11 MEMBERS ABSENT : none
12
13 Staffpresent: Acting City Administrator, Dan Tesch; Director of Finance, Al Rolek;
14 Director of Public Safety, Dave Pecchia; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; City Clerk, Julie
15 Bartell
16
17 Mayor Bergeson called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. in the Council Workroom at
18 Lino Lakes City Hall
19
20 City Administrator Position — The mayor remarked that this meeting was called to
21 discuss how the council intends to move ahead on the vacant city administrator position..
22
23 Administrator Tesch updated the council on hiring process. The deadline for applications
24 has come and gone and consultant Harry Brull has narrowed the 36 applicants down to 6
25 or 7. If the council is to delay the process, there is some concern about how that could
26 impact the pooL The process could be moved forward just to the point of notifying those
27 not in the final pool and notifying the finalists that the process will be delayed.
28
29 Finance Director Rolek explained the approximate financial impact of not filling the
30 position. The budget has already been adjusted to reflect a vacancy for six months.
31
32 A council member suggested that part of the decision is what council will make the
33 selection — the council of 2009 or 2010. The current council may be better suited to find
34 a person with a good fit given its collective experience.
35
36 A council member suggested that it makes sense to have more budget discussion before
37 moving on the position and Finance Director Rolek noted that the first budget discussion
38 will be August 10. With that schedule in mind, a member suggested that the council take
39 up the hiring process in September and October, that wouldn't be much different from the
40 originally planned hiring schedule but would allow for budget considerations prior to
41 hiring.
42
43 The council requested that staff provide a timeline for the process.
44
SPECIAL WORK SESSION July 13, 2009
DRAFT
1 Proposed Charter Amendment — City Clerk Bartell distributed a letter received this day
2 from the Lino Lakes Charter Commission. The letter includes a proposed charter
3 amendment. Clerk Bartell explained that the proposed amendment is being presented
4 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12, Subdivision 7, Amendment by Ordinance
5 and that state law lays out a process and time schedule on how such an amendment must
6 be considered. The letter had been forwarded to the city attorney upon receipt.
7
8 Upon reviewing the schedule and noting that the council is required to publish a hearing
9 notice on the amendment within one month of receipt, the council decided that they will
10 discuss the amendment at their next regular full work session on August 3. They directed
11 staff to in epare a report and schedule explaining the process and also outlining costs
12 associated with the change called for by the amendment.
13
14 Pine Street Improvement Project — City Engineer Studenski explained that the residents
15 are staying in touch, the city of Columbus has confirmed that they are on board, and staff
16 is keeping people up to date. At this point, he is comfortable that the residents are ready
17 for the feasibility study to move forward. Mr. Studenski clarified that the costs will be
18 divided appropriately with Columbus, in consideration of the different processes.
19
20 The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
21
22 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council meeting held on July 27
23 2009.
24
25
26
27
28 City Clerk, Julianne Bartell John Bergeson, Mayor
2
—31—
•
•
•
SPECIAL WORK SESSION June 3, 2009
DRAFT
1
2 CITY OF LINO LAKES
3 MINUTES
4 SPECIAL WORK SESSION — COMP PLAN UPDATE
5
6 DATE : June 3, 2009
7 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m.
8 TIME ENDED : 9:25 p.m.
9 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Members Reinert, Stoltz,
10 Gallup, O'Donnell and Mayor Bergeson
11 MEMBERS ABSENT : none
12
13 Staff present Acting City Administrator Dan Tesch; Director of Community
14 Development Nfichael Grochala; City Planner, Jeff Smyser, City Clerk Julie Bartell
15
16 Mayor Bergeson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Police Workroom at Lino
17 Lakes City Hall.
18
19 Bonestroo consultant, Ciara Schlicting, reviewed the written staff report relative to the
20 council's discussion of the proposed 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update (the Plan). The
21 council had tabled discussion of the Plan at the May 11, 2009 city council meeting with a
22 plan to discuss the following modifications: modification of forecasts, a land use change
23 request relative to 797 Main Street and the Waldoch Farm Garden Center, and possible
24 ordinances to restrict or control growth of affordable housing. Ms. Schlicting first
25 mentioned the inclusion of a natural resource protection plan within the Plan, noting that
26 it is a valuable element unique to this Plan. There have been several comments by
27 council members about the impact growth could have on natural resources and she
28 wanted to point out that important protection that is included in the Plan. She reviewed
29 the citizen involvement history that has brought the city to the current Plan proposal,
30 including a survey, visioning, and the citizen advisory panel (that included citizens from
31 the visioning process as well as representatives of the city's advisory boards). The goals
32 and strategies from the vision plan were incorporated, through review of the advisory
33 panel, directly into the Plan. When the advisory panel looked at forecasts, they
34 considered both the Metropolitan Council forecast and a market approach. Consultant
35 Bonestroo also reviewed the resource management plan with the council noting that it
36 integrates many elements of resources together and will help guide development while
37 protecting the area's natural resources. The land use plan was developed as a full-build
38 by the advisory group so that long -range infrastructure planning could be included. Then
39 that plan was trimmed back in terms of MUSA to accommodate the 2030 market based
40 forecast. She reviewed the staging included in the Plan. She pointed out that there is
41 actually less land staged in the proposed 2030 Plan that in the current 2020 Plan. She
42 reviewed a map that indicated all the elements coming together (land use, resources
43 management and staging). Staff is now recommending, based on the comments they've
44 heard, that the forecast be amended to reflect those contained within the Metropolitan
45 Council system statement as amended by the city council through the Hardwood Creek
SPECIAL WORK SESSION June 3, 2009
DRAFT
46 Comprehensive Plan Amendment that occurred in 2006. That would result in the
47 reduction of the cumulative 2030 household forecast by a total of 2,000 units and would
48 also reduce the city's affordable housing goal to 560 units. That change would require
49 some text modifications and remodeling of the city's sanitary sewer system and traffic
50 system projections.
51
52 A council member asked how the 2,000 reduction is reflected as far as the two plan stages
53 and staff explained that it would basically be based on staging but staging doesn't
54 guarantee development within a certain time period.
55
56 Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive W, asked if there is any criteria that would deal with a
57 situation where stage one is completed prior to plans. Would the city be able to question
58 stage two opening up prematurely? Also, regarding roadways, they will be greatly
59 impacted by fast growth and he is concerned that could create quality of life issues.
60
61 Community Development Director Grochala responded that a movement to stage two
62 before its established time would require a comp plan amendment by the council.
63 Movement within the stages (la to lb) would require a council resolution.
64
65 A council member requested a discussion on pace. Consultant Schlicting explained that
66 the council will have control over pace because they review and approve development
67 proposals based on the established goals and policies in the Plan. In one way the
68 infrastmcture must precede the development and the Plan guides infrastructure
69 development and is a legal foundation on which to manage pace. Staff pointed out that a
70 goal of the Plan is to accommodate quality growth; that includes the resource
71 management plan element that protects what the city has identified as planned resources
72 and the same follows with transportation and sewer where the plan includes goals.
73
74 If the council directs the change in the forecast, staff would require some additional
75 consultant assistance in making modifications to the Plan elements. There will be more
76 land than forecasted but that will be explained as part of the modification.
77
78 Paul Tralle, Planning and Zoning Board chair, addressed the counciL He has been
79 involved in this process from the beginning. A great deal of time has been spent by many
80 volunteers from the community (17 meetings). There were public open houses, open
81 discussions in Zoning & Planning Board meetings, they crunched the numbers and he is
82 standing by the Plan they have recommended. He suggests that it is inappropriate for a
83 council member to discount all the work that went into the Plan and push to make
84 changes based on the input of four people at the last council meeting — there were many
85 more people involved in bringing it forward.
86
87 A council member replied that he has had a level of concern from the onset of the process
88 with some of the numbers and, further, some residents have voiced concerns directly to
89 council members. It was noted that the changes being considered now won't change the
2
—33—
•
•
SPECIAL WORK SESSION June 3, 2009
DRAFT
90 vision that was brought forward but will allow more flexibility as the things evolve. He
91 believes this is a more realistic view.
92
93 Laura Carlson, participant in the visioning process and member of the Comprehensive
94 Plan Update Advisory Panel (the Panel) explained that she believes the direction of the
95 group was based on the analysis (numbers) information provided with consideration of
96 not being arbitrary. It is important to realize that growth isn't just about people who own
97 lots but also people who own land. The advisory group felt it was important to follow
98 market forecasts but if those numbers are truly changing, she doesn't feel the group
99 would have a strong problem with an adjustment.
100
101 Barbara Bor, Environmental Board and Panel member, stated that she sees that residents
102 in established neighborhoods are concerned about changes that could occur to their area
103 as a result of growth; they recognize that growth is inevitable and tax base is good but she
104 thinks those people want to see that the council is doing what is possible to keep things
105 positive and minimize the negative aspects of the growth. She believes it was a good
106 process that brings the Plan forward although it was not helpful that some of those who
107 volunteered to participate in the citizen process did not show up to meetings but yet did
108 not resign their positions so that another volunteer could step up.
109
110 Michael Hyden, Planning and Zoning Board and Panel member, added that he supports
111 Mr. Tralle's comments in that public input was highly welcomed during the Plan
112 development. He feels the market will be foremost and the Plan proposed is good
113 because it prepares the city for the growth that will come. It is not wrong to go slow but
114 you may miss out on good opportunities. He supports the Plan as it was presented.
115 There is control in the Plan through the use of phasing that gives the city the flexibility to
116 move.
117
118 A council member suggested that pace isn't the only consideration but the restrictions that
119 have been in place from the last update have served well to allow the city to move
120 forward carefully. Good opportunities can be moved on as thoughtful decisions but you
121 also have the ability to turn down development you don't want.
122
123 Terry O'Connell, owner of a property on Main Street, first remarked that there were more
124 than four residents at the last council meeting. She's heard from a few neighbors that the
125 process hasn't been geared toward open discussion as much as promoting agreement with
126 what is proposed.
127
128 Council Members weighed in as follows on the Plan as proposed by the Panel and the
129 alternative that modifies the Plan forecast
130
131 - The Plan brought forward by the advisory panel is very good and has been
132 identified as one of the most thorough and well researched plans of any city
133 involved in this process. A change in the forecast maybe an appropriate
SPECIAL WORK SESSION June 3, 2009
DRAFT
134 consideration especially if that is necessary to gain the support needed for
135 passage.
136 The Plan that came forward is a good one but there is room for discussion on
137 the numbers.
138 The council as a whole is committed to optionality and quality and the process
139 that brought this Plan forward has required those values all along. It includes
140 options for input from the city as growth is proposed. A great process brings a
141 great result and the advisory work has been a key element in the process and
142 that shows in the product.
143 - Although the Metropolitan Council forecast is a bit lower than the changes
144 proposed at this time, compromise is important also. The affordable housing
145 component is at least more realistic.
146
147 The question being if the council is ready to bring the Plan forward for a vote, more
148 discussion was requested. A council member suggested it's important to bring forward a
149 maximum of two options to the council meeting; more options would make reaching
150 agreement more difficult and moving forward less likely. Another council member
151 suggested that the consensus of this meeting should determine what will go to the council
152 floor.
153
154 The council discussed the request of Teresa Weinkauf (797 Main Street) and of Jeff Joyer
155 (Waldoch Farm Garden). Ms. Weinkauf is requesting a proposed land use change from
156 Low Density Residential to Commercial. Mr. Joyer is requesting that a portion of his
157 farm site be retained as commercial land use designation.
158
159 Planner Smyser first explained the city's responsibility under statute to conform its
160 zoning regulations to its Plan. The city's zoning follows the land use designation,
161 although there are differing zoning districts within land use categories. He showed maps
162 indicating the current land use plan and the proposed. The Weinkauf request relates to
163 how the property is guided. The existing zoning (general business) conflicts with the land
164 use designation (low density residential) and that conflict has existed for years and years.
165 The city would be correcting the situation by making the change proposed in the Plan.
166 Because of that conflict, the cun-ent use of the Weinkauf property is considered non-
167 conforming and the best thing to do with that type of a situation (in order to comply with
168 state law) is to make a change so that it conforms. The Planning and Zoning Board has
169 recommended concurrence with the Plan. Part of the consideration is that there is interest
170 on the part of the Weinkaufs to have a home business. When the city's home occupation
171 restrictions were reviewed, staff saw that the restrictions are quite strict and so they are
172 open to looking at some change when the zoning ordinance is reviewed. If the current
173 non conforming situation is allowed to continue, there is concern that there would be no
174 buffer for the residential area if businesses were to develop.
175
176 A council member noted that making all four properties commercial would not solve the
177 problem since only one of the properties would be true commercial
178
4
-35-
•
SPECIAL WORK SESSION June 3, 2009
DRAFT
179 The council discussed the home based business issue. They recognize that there are home
180 based businesses legitimately operating in residential areas in the city. Staff is confident
181 that the problem can be solved for the Weinkauf type of business through zoning
182 regulation changes. The Planning and Zoning Board supports that course of action.
183
184 It was pointed out that when the Weinkauf property was purchased and the city was
185 approached about appropriate uses, the city gave assurances that a business situation
186 could be worked out.
187
188 Staff noted that the driving goal is to bring the zoning and planning for the property into
189 concurrence. A council member pointed out that there are two options for the council —
190 zoning change or change the proposed Plan. Staff is recommending a zoning regulation
191 amendment as the zoning code is updated according to the Plan. Another option would
192 be to designate the area mixed use.
193
194 Ms. Weinkauf expressed concern about being limited under new home occupation
195 regulations. Also she believes that some of the other owners do not want to lose the
196 commercial designation. Four of the five parcels owners (one owner is out of town) are
197 requesting commercial zoning. There is after all a bar and a junk yard already operating
198 in the vicinity.
199
200 Planner Smyser explained that the Planning and Zoning Board recommendation is to
201 leave the properties as low density residential (as designated in the Plan), rezone the
202 properties to match and in turn revamp the home occupation zoning regulations. To
203 designate the property commercial would mean that it could be developed as such with
204 little or no buffer from adjacent residential areas.
205
206 The question for the council being what will be included in the Plan relative to the
207 Weinkauf property, staff was directed to not change the proposed Plan.
208
209 The council discussed the Jeff Joyer property (Waldoch Farm Garden Center). It is
210 currently guided medium density residential after 2030; existing zoning is both rural and
211 general business. There is agriculture and business going on there. The request of Mr.
212 Joyer is that a portion of the property be guided commercial (so they can expand in the
213 future). Staffs concern is that there is no infrastructure in place or planned that could
214 support that and other issues as welL Staff s recommendation is no change to the Plan
215 and that as part of zoning code revisions, they will reexamine and reapproach the use as a
216 commercial greenhouse. If something were to change (infrastructure), there could be a
217 comp plan amendment.
218
219 The council concurred in their support of the staff recommendation.
220
221 Staff affirmed their commitment to working with both Mr. Joyer and the Weinkauf s as
222 zoning changes are considered.
223
SPECIAL WORK SESSION June 3, 2009
DRAFT
224 The council discussed the third agenda item - ordinances to restrict or control growth of
225 affordable housing. Staff is requesting further clarification on the council's direction in
226 this are& Community Development Director Grochala explained that he has discussed
227 with the city attorney the council's past direction that staff should prepare such
228 regulations. The city attorney noted some concern in that if the intent is to restrict
229 affordable housing, it may be in conflict with the state law that requires the city to
230 provide affordable housing land opportunity through the Plan. Also the Plan includes a
231 goal that calls for affordable housing in all housing districts. Staff discussed ordinance
232 possibilities with the council recently and recommended that the best approach would be
233 through the existing planned unit development (PUD) process, and perhaps incentives
234 through that process. That approach will allow ample council review and consideration
235 of projects. Staff is looking for more clarity on the council's direction.
236
237 A council member suggested that the council's discussion about ordinance amendments
238 has been directed at pace, quality and density. Perhaps affordability falls into that some
239 way but to say that ordinance changes have been requested to restrict affordable housing
240 is not accurate. The council member still wants to see what ordinances will look like that
241 deal with pace, quality and density.
242
243 Community Development Director Grochala announced that in the area of quality, staff
244 wants to look from a design perspective on how to transition different types of
245 development and that's something you can build into your code.
246
247 A council member suggested that some communities have ended up with bad
248 development when they've gotten into subsidized housing situations. He's interested in
249 some limitations in that area so the city can have some controL
250
251 A council member remarked that education in the area of affordable housing development
252 would be helpful for the council. It would be interesting to see what other cities (Edina,
253 Wayzata for example) are doing. The council can then decide how to be proactive instead
254 of waiting to see what comes through the door.
255
256 Staff added that the development process will be an important element. The council will
257 have discretion through the PUD process and will also have the opportunity to talk about
258 controls (and incentives) through the development process. Perhaps the best control now
259 is to make no change.
260
261 A council member suggested that the council is making a commitment to educate itself
262 further about affordable housing.
263
264 The council concurred that the Plan will be on the agenda for the next regular council
265 meeting and will include the modifications directed at this meeting.
266
6
—37—
SPECIAL WORK SESSION June 3, 2009
DRAFT
267 A council members expressed concern that the council is being asked to vote on
268 something that isn't finalized (the final product won't be available at the council
269 meeting).
270
271 Community Development Director Grochala assured the council that the changes directed
272 will be incorporated. The changes that will be occurring will be highlighted for the
273 council at a work session before the meeting and for the audience at the meeting. There
274 will also be more information gathered for review before the council's final
275 consideration.
276
277 The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
278
279
280
281 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council meeting held on July 27,
282 2009.
283
284
285
286
287 Julianne Bartell, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor
•
•
Council Member
adoption:
s-h b u. -ec eptmic,a v\lat k 5essi
vi July L_� 7001
CORRECTED
AGENDA ITEM 1F
introduced the following resolution and moved its
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -51
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 09-40
WHEREAS, Resolution 09-40 authorized the transfer of funds from the Drug Forfeiture
Fund to the Crime Prevention Account for the purchase of office equipment, and
WHEREAS, funding for this purchase has become available through a payment from
Century College, and
WHEREAS, the original transfer is no longer needed and the budget should instead be
amended to reflect the additional revenue.
. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Resolution 09-40 is hereby amended with
the following budget amendment being adopted:
Increase Increase
Crime Prevention (101 - 420 -4214 -000) $3,000.00
Police Other Revenue (101- 3422 -000)
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of July 2009.
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
$3,000.00
John Bergeson, Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member Gallup and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM #4A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: David J. Pecchia
Public Safety Director /Chief of Police
DATE: July 27, 2009
TOPIC:
Consideration of Resolution No. 09-49 accepting $100
donation from Residential Mortgage Group's "Refer a
friend, Build your community" program.
VOTES REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND
The Residential Mortgage Group (RMG) has a charitable donation program called "Refer a
friend, Build your community" where a donation can be made to organizations on behalf of
the RMG client.
Adam & Laura VanderPoel participated in this program with RMG and have selected the
Lino Lakes Police Department as the recipient of a $100 donation in Loving Memory of
Officer Shawn Silvera ".
The Lino Lakes Police Department is requesting council to adopt Resolution No. 09-49
and publicly accept the donation and thank Adam and Laura VanderPoel and the
Residential Mortgage Group for their generous donation to the Lino Lakes Police
Department.
OPTIONS
1. Adopt Resolution No. 09 -49 accepting the donation.
2. Retum Resolution No. 09-49 to staff for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
Option No. 1
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 09-49
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE GROUP
ON BEHALF OF ADAM AND LAURA VANDERPOEL IN THE AMOUNT OF $100
WHEREAS, Residential Mortgage Group has a charitable donation program called "Refer
a friend, Build your community"; and
WHEREAS, Clients closing a loan with Residential Mortgage group can select a
beneficiary that Residential Mortgage Group will donate to on the client's
behalf; and
WHEREAS, Adam and Laura VanderPoel selected the Lino Lakes Police Department to
receive a $100 donation as a part of this program; and
WHEREAS, The Lino Lakes Police Department wishes to express its appreciation to both
the VanderPoets and Residential Mortgage Group for the donation; and
WHEREAS, the monies will be appropriated to the General Fund in the following manner.
Increase Revenue — Contributions 101 - 3720 -000 $100.00
Increase Police Expenditure $100.00
(101- 420 - 4214-000 Crime Prevention)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lino Lakes City Council members, do
hereby accept the donation of $100.00 and wishes to express its gratitude to Adam and
Laura VanderPoel as well as Residential Mortgage Group for the donation.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of July 2009.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6.A.
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson
C.C. MEETING DATE: July 27, 2009
TOPIC: Resolution No. 09-52 — Approving a variance to the
Lot Area, Lot Width, and Road Frontage requirements
for Xcel Energy
BACKGROUND
Xcel Energy has requested approval of variances for required road frontage, minimum
lot area, minimum lot depth, and minimum lot width to allow the division of the subject
sites by a future administrative minor subdivision. The city granted similar variances for
St. Paul Regional Water Service parcels in 2004 and 2006. The intention of the
application is to allow the parcels to be divided in the future (via minor subdivision) and
sold to adjacent property owners for combination into existing parcels.
The existing transmission lines do not follow the property that is owned by Xcel exactly,
and therefore the company is returning the land to the adjacent property owners and is
receiving an updated easement in lieu.
• ANALYSIS
•
Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning:The table below identifies the existing
land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area.
Location
Existing Land Use
Guided Land Use
Existing
Zoning
R (Rural)
Subject
Vacant
Low Density Sewered Residential
North
Single Family
Low Density Unsewered Residential
R (Rural)
South
Single Family &
Agriculture
Medium Density Sewered
Residential & Low Density
Unsewered Residential
R (Rural))
East
Single Family &
Agricultural
Medium Density Sewered
Residential
R (Rural)
West
Single Family
Low Density Unsewered Residential
R (Rural)
Lot Requirements:
The minimum requirements within the Rural zoning district include a 10 acre lot
minimum and 330 foot wide Tots. In addition, the subdivision ordinance requires that 'all
lots shall have frontage on an improved public street that provides the required lot width
at the minimum front yard setback'.
The proposed division will not meet any of these requirements, but the new lots will be
merged with existing Tots and therefore will only exist on paper and for a short period of
time.
Xcel Energy Variance, page 2
FINDINGS
In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the
City shall make a finding of fact:
a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls.
These parcels are completely surrounded by adjoining private property; and
would not be able to be developed as usable parcels due to the sizes or lack
of road frontage.
b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to
his property not created by the landowner.
The physical shape, location and isolated nature of the parcels prevent most
private uses.
c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable
use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
Economic considerations are not a major factor in this proposal, the intent is
to minimize the applicant's holdings and center an easement directly over the
existing transmission lines.
d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands,
structures, or buildings in the same district.
There are very few other situations that can be compared to this one. Land
locked parcels owned and operated almost exclusively for utility purposes
would receive the same consideration.
e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance.
Combining these properties with the adjacent landowner's parcels will in no
way violate the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
On July 8, the Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of this
request.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the following conditions:
1. The properties must be divided through the minor subdivision process.
2. When ownership of these properties changes hands the new owner(s) are
required to combine them with adjacent parcels to avoid creating a new parcel.
•
•
•
Xcel Energy Variance, page 3
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 09-52
APPROVING VARIANCES TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOT AREA, LOT WIDTH,
AND ROAD FRONTAGE FOR XCEL ENERGY.
WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a minor
subdivision which requires variances for lot area, lot width, and road frontage, and
WHEREAS, review and approvals of variances are govemed by state statutes and City
ordinances, and
WHEREAS, the site is legally described as:
A strip of land Fifty (50) feet in width running over and across the Northeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter (NE 1/4 of NW %4), Section Twenty -five (25), Township Thirty-one
(31) North, Range Twenty -two (22) West; said strip of land being Twenty -five (25) feet in
width on each side of a center line which crosses above described tract and is described
as follows, to wit Commencing at a stake on the North line of said Section, One
Thousand Five Hundred Ninety -two and Seven - tenths (1592.7) feet East of the
Northwest comer thereof, running thence South Fifty -two degrees and Twenty -seven
minutes West (S 52° 27' W) One Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty -seven and Three -
tenths (1987.3) feet to a stake on the West line of said Section, One Thousand Two
Hundred and Six (1206) feet South of the Northwest comer thereof.
,and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings:
a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls.
These parcels are completely surrounded by adjoining private property;
and would not be able to be developed as usable parcels due to the
sizes or lack of road frontage.
b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to
his property not created by the landowner.
The physical shape, location and isolated nature of the parcels prevent
most private uses.
Xcel Energy Variance, page 4
c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable
use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
Economic considerations are not a major factor in this proposal, the
intent is to minimize the applicant's holdings and center an easement
directly over the existing transmission lines.
d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands,
structures, or buildings in the same district.
There are very few other situations that can be compared to this one.
Land locked parcels owned and operated almost exclusively for utility
purposes would receive the same consideration.
e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance.
Combining these properties with the adjacent landowner's parcels will
in no way violate the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
hereby approves the variances for lot area, lot width and road frontage.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the variances are subject to the following
conditions:
1. The properties must be divided through the minor subdivision process.
2. When ownership of these properties changes hands the new owner(s) are
required to combine them with adjacent parcels to avoid creating a new parcel.
John J. Bergeson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Julie Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of July, 2009.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
DataViewOnline Map
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be
used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data from city, county, state
and federal offices, and is to be used for reference purposes only.
httpsJ/ portal. sehinc .com /sehsvc/html/dvoimapLa ofi tm
6292009
1
r
•
•
•
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM 6B
Michael Grochala
July 27, 2009
TOPIC: Public Hearing, I- 35E/CSAH 14 Improvement
Project
ACTION REQUIRED: Simple Majority to Open and Close Public
Hearing
BACKGROUND
The City Council accepted the Feasibility Study, prepared by SRF Consulting Group,
Inc., for the I- 35E/CSAH 14 (Main Street) Interchange Improvements on July 6, 2009.
In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the City Charter, the City must
hold a hearing on improvements prior to ordering the project. The purpose of the public
hearing is to solicit public comment on the proposed improvement from interested
persons whether or not they are in the proposed assessment area. In accordance with
City Charter provisions 60 days must elapse from the date of the public hearing before
the City Council can take any further action.
The interchange has experienced significant congestion problems for the past several
years, specifically at the freeway ramps during a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The
proposed project includes the reconstruction of the interchange between 21st Avenue
and Otter Lake Road by bridge replacement and widening, roadway replacement and
widening, reconstruction of existing freeway ramps and construction of new ramps,
installation of traffic control signals, improvement to local road connections and
construction of pedestrian/bicycle facilities.
The estimated cost of the improvement is approximately $23 million including land
acquisition, engineering, and construction. Approximately $5.5 million is proposed to
be assessed to benefiting property owners. The City has held two meetings with
affected property owners over the last month to discuss the project.
Staff is currently working with Springsted Inc., the City's financial consultant, and Anoka
County to evaluate additional funding sources for the project. The results of this
exercise may lower the total amount to be assessed against benefiting properties. Any
reduction in the proposed assessment amounts will be calculated and incorporated into
the final assessment role and presented at a second public hearing referred to as the
the "Assessment Hearing" following published and mailed notice.
Additionally, the City is proposing to let property owners defer payment of the special
assessment until a later date, provided the property owner or the property meets certain
criteria. There are three types of deferrals:
1. Undeveloped /unplatted property
2. Senior citizen deferrals
3. Green acres
The terms, conditions, and standards of the deferrals would be set by the council in
conjunction with the adoption of the assessment role. In the case of undeveloped or
green acres properties, it is the intent that the assessments would be deferred until
development occurs on the property.
Representatives from SRF Consulting Group, Inc., will be at the meeting to present the
improvement report, the proposed assessments and address public comments.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending that the council open the public hearing, accept public testimony
and close the hearing.
2
—49—
•
•
•
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson
MEETING DATE: July 27, 2009
TOPIC: Resolution No. 09-48, Approving the 2009/2010
Management Plan for Conservation Areas in Foxborough
and the Disbursement of Foxborough Conservation
Management Stewardship Funds for work completed in 2009
VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5
BACKGROUND
The Foxborough Development was approved on August 22, 2005. Foxborough is a
conservation development that set up a stewardship fund for implementing the
management plan for conservation easement areas set aside within the geographic
limits of the development. Covenants and restrictions have been written subjecting all
those who purchase property in Foxborough to a Homeowners Association with
conservation easement use restrictions, yearly management work plan approvals by the
City, and annual fees for the maintenance of conservation areas.
The Conservation Fund for Foxborough consists of a $100,000 endowment established
by the developer, and annual fees of $100 per lot. Yearly Interest from the $100,000
endowment plus the annual $100 per lot Homeowners Association fee establishes the
amount of money available to manage conservation easement areas in Foxborough.
There are 57 Tots within Foxborough. The annual contribution by the Homeowners
Association is $5,700 plus interest accrued. The Homeowners Association is
responsible for collecting the funds and the City maintains the collected funds in a
designated account. Until sufficient lots are sold within the development, the Developer
acts as the Homeowner's Association and has paid dues for 2009. The dues, together
with interest from the endowment fund, establish an available fund balance of $12,690
for 2009.
As part of Foxborough Development approvals, a Restoration and Management Plan
was required that laid out typical work schedules for the conservation areas. Each year,
the Homeowners Association must hire an ecologist to make recommendations
conceming the management of the Foxborough Conservation Areas relative to the plan
and monies available. Proposed work plans submitted to the City by the Homeowners
Association, which are the product of the ecologist's analysis, are reviewed by the
Environmental Board. The Environmental Board then makes a recommendation to the
City Council conceming the annual work plan. A similar process is followed to review
completed work for approving the transfer of money from the Foxborough Stewardship
fund to the Homeowners Association to pay for the completed work.
Attachment 1 is the report dated June 18, 2009 completed by Jason Husveth of Critical
Connections. Mr. Husveth is the ecologist hired by the Association (Royal Oaks Realty)
to make management recommendations. Recommendations are for the proposed work
plan for 2009 and 2010. The City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board reviewed the
report from Critical Connections and the Foxborough Homeowners Association
(presently Royal Oaks Realty) at the June 24, 2009 Environmental Board meeting. The
Environmental Board made a recommendation that the proposed work schedule for
2009 and 2010 be approved and stewardship funds released upon completion of
proposed tasks for 2009 only. Resolution No. 09-48 approves the release of $12,690
for work completed in 2009. It also approves the work plan for 2010.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve adoption of Resolution No. 09-48, approving the 2009/ 2010 work plan for
Foxborough conservation areas, and the release of $12,690 from the stewardship
fund for work done in 2009.
2. Refer back to the Environmental Board for further consideration.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 09-48, Approving the 2009/2010 work plan for Foxborough
conservation areas in Foxborough and the Disbursement of Foxborough
Conservation Funds for Work Completed in 2009.
2. Critical Connections Proposed Work Plan for 2009 and 2010.
•
•
•
• Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 09-48
APPROVING THE 2009/2010 WORK SCHEDULE FOR FOXBOROUGH
CONSERVATION AREAS AND TO DISBURSE FOXBOROUGH CONSERVATION
MANAGEMENT STEWARDSHIP FUNDS FOR 2009
WHEREAS, Foxborough is a conservation development that set up a stewardship fund
for managing conservation easement areas set aside within the geographic limits of the
development and
WHEREAS, The fund has an existing available balance of $12,690 for 2009; and
WHEREAS, The City received a proposed work plan describing work in 2009 and 2010;
and
WHEREAS, Proposed work plans are consistent with an approved Restoration and
Management Plan, and has been reviewed by the City of Lino Lakes Environmental
Board; and
WHEREAS, The cost of proposed work in the 2009 work plan totals $12,690; and
WHEREAS, The Lino Lakes Environmental Board reviewed the proposed costs and
work plan for Foxborough conservation areas on June 24, 2009 and recommended to
the City Council that all proposed tasks and costs be approved for 2009.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
The City Council approves the release to the Foxborough Homeowners Association an
amount of $12,690 from the stewardship fund for work completed in 2009 described as
Tasks 1 -6 in the work plan dated June 18, 2009 and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT The City Council approves the proposed work for
2009 and 2010 as prepared by Jason Husveth, Critical Connections Ecological
Services, Inc. dated June 18, 2009, and that completed work in 2009 shall be reviewed
before the City approves the release of funds for those tasks.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of July 2009.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
•
Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc.
14760 Oakhill Road, Scandia, Minnesota 55073
Natural
Resource
Consulting
Landscape
Ecology
Botanical
Inventories
Threatened &
Endangered
Species Surveys
Greenway &
Open Space
Planning
Natural
Community
Restoration
Wetland
Delineation &
Permitting
Wetland
Banking &
Monitoring
Minnesota
Land Cover
Classification
Geographic
Information
Systems
Global
Positioning
Systems
Database
Management &
Development
Environmental
Education
Mr. Marty Asleson
Natural Resources Specialist
Gty of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
June 18, 2009
Mr. Marcel Eibensteiner
Royal Oaks Realty
1000 County Road E, Suite 150
Shoreview, Minnesota 55126
Re: Foxborough Conservation Development, Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Restoration and Management Planning for the 2009 and 2010
Dear Mr. Asleson and Mr. Black:
At the request of the Foxborough Homeowner's Association and Royal Oaks Realty (ROR),
Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc (CCES) prepared the following proposed scope of
work for ecological restoration and management of Foxborough conservation outlots in from
2009 and 2010. Proposed tasks and priorities were developed from CMS's past experience
implementing restoration and management tasks at Foxborough (2005 - 2008), conversations
and site visits with Clty staff, and in accordance with the Foxborough Restoration and
Management Plan (CCES, August 2005). The proposed restoration and management tasks
will be implemented during from July 2009 through December 2010. The proposed scope of
work and prioritization of tasks are based on available funding within the Foxborough
Conservation Fund. The Clty of Lino Lakes has recently informed CCES that available funding
is as follows: $1,960 for 2009, and $6,700 for 2010; a total of $19,660 for July 2009 through
December 2010. t 12,(90 Ir'
The following proposed tasks, timelines, costs, and priorities constitute the proposed scope
of work for 2009 and 2010 within Foxborough's conservation outlots.
2009 Proposed Restoration and Management Tasks:
Task 1: Management and Removal of Buckthorn
CCES restoration crews will manage and treat remaining areas of buckthorn infestation and
resprout The primary areas to be treated include the northeast corner of the development,
along the trail corridor, and within the aspen woodlands of the southern portion of the site.
CCES restoration crews will cut and remove buckthorn brush, and chemically treat the cut
stumps with Glyphosate herbicide.
Phone: 651.433.4410
Fax 651.433.4528
-54-
Emaib info @ccesinc.com Web: www.ccesinc.com
Foxborough Conservation Development, Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Proposed Restoration and Management for 2009 and 2010
Scope of Work and Cost Estimate
Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc
Task 1 Timeline: July through December 2009
Task 1 Costs: $5,200 (Labor and Herbicide)
Page 2 of 3
Task 2: Management of Reed Canary Grass
CCES restoration crews will mow and herbicide reed canary grass within select areas of the Foxborough
conservation outlots. Reed canary grass will be treated within the northern wetland fringe and uplands
of the wetland mitigation area, in natural wetlands along the trail corridor, and within stormwater
basins that have been seeded with native species in past years. Reed canary grass will be treated with
Glyphosate herbicide when it occurs in monotypic stands, and Sethoxydim (grass specific) herbicide
when it occurs intermittently with other desirable native species.
Task 2 Timeline: July through October 2009
Task 2 Costs: $3,200 (Labor and Herbicide)
Task 3: Management of Invasive Cattails
Invasive cattails (Typha angustifolia and Typha X glauco) will be managed within stormwater basins of
within the Foxborough conservation outlots. Invasive cattails are becoming problematic within these
basins, and threaten to out - compete native species that were seeded into the basins in previous years.
Invasive cattails will be cut, and treated with Glyphosate herbicide.
Task 3 Timeline: July through October 2009
Task 3 Costs: $2,250 (Labor and Herbicide)
Task 4: Management of Other Invasive Species and Noxious Weeds
Other noxious weeds, such as Canada thistle, birds -foot trefoil, and yellow and white sweet clover, will
be chemically treated by CCES restoration crews within the Foxborough conservation outlots. These
species are particularly problematic along the trail corridor, where they are gaining a foothold from past
grading and trail construction. CCES restoration crews will chemically treat these other invasive species
with Glyphosate based herbicides (such as Roundup).
Task 4 Timeline: July 2009 through October 2010
Task 4 Costs: $1,800 (Labor and Herbicide)
Task 5: Removal of Non - Functioning Silt Fence
Damaged and non - functioning silt fence within the Foxborough conservation outlots will be removed by
CCES restoration crews. Functioning silt fences will be left in place, and reinforced if necessary.
Task 4 Timeline: July through October 2009
Task 4 Costs: $790 (Labor and Removal)
-55-
•
•
•
•
Foxborough Conservation Development, Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Proposed Restoration and Management for 2009 and 2010
Scope of Work and Cost Estimate
Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc.
Page 3 of 3
Task 6: Project Management and Reporting
CCES will manage the implementation of proposed tasks for 2009. Jason Husveth (CCES's Principal
Ecologist) will report to and coordinate with City staff, the Lino Lakes Environmental Board, and the
Foxborough Homeowners Association to inform these constituents of work completed CCES has
budgeted six (6) hours of Mr. Husveth's time to perform this task.
Task 6 Timeline: July 2009 through December 2010
Task 6 Costs: $720 (Consulting Hours)
2010 Proposed Restoration and Management Tasks:
Task 7: Prescribed Burn of Selected Habitats within Conservation Outlots
CCES will perform a spring prescribed burn within up to 10 acres of the Foxborough conservation
outlots. Prescribed burning will focus on habitats that were not burned in 2007 and /or have the
greatest ecological need for a prescribed burn. CCES will prepare a burning permit application, obtain
the permits, and prepare all burn units for prescribed burning (Le. create burn breaks and isolate burn
units). The burn will be implemented in April or May 2010. If the burn cannot be implement in the
spring of 2010 (due to weather constraints), CCES will implement the burn in October 2010.
Task 7 Timeline: July 2009 through December 2010
Task 7 Costs: $5,700 (Consulting, Labor, Materials, and Equipment)
Total Costs Tasks 1 through 7: $19,660.00
Thank you for reviewing this proposed scope of work for the Foxborough conservation development.
Please feel free to contact Jason Husveth (CCES Principal Ecologist) if you have any questions or require
additional information. We hope this proposal meets your approval, and that we can begin
implementation as soon as possible.
Respectfully submitted,
Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc.
•
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
C. C. MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA ITEM 6 D
Jeff Smyser
July 27, 2009
Ordinance No. 04 -09
Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Amending General
Business and Limited Business Zoning Districts to Allow
Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings As
Conditional Uses
and
City Code Amendment: Required Distance for Liquor
License Shall Not Apply if School or Church Is in Limited
Business or General Business Zoning District
The zoning ordinance creates zoning districts to regulate the use of land and structures in the
city. We have three business zoning districts: Neighborhood Business, Limited Business, and
General Business (NB, LB, and GB). Each zoning district lists the types of uses that are
allowed. We have received an application to amend the zoning ordinance to allow churches in
the GB district, which currently is not allowed. This led to the examination of the other business
districts and the requirements included there, as well as other statutes that might be relevant.
This research led to the recognition that under federal law, if similar uses are allowed in a zoning
district, churches must be treated equally.
In addition, the existing City Code regulations for liquor licenses creates a separation of 1000
feet between a liquor license location and a church or school. If a church or school locates in an
LB or GB zone and this separation is applied, it would eliminate most of the city's commercial
zones as locations for restaurants or other uses that need a liquor license.
The application was submitted by a church planning to acquire the vacant site formerly owned
by the VFW. However, it is important to recognize that the submitted application only includes
amending the ordinance The application does not include review of a church plan or of the
conversion of a building into a church. A future application for a conditional use permit for a
church on the site will be required_ Approval of the currently requested ordinance amendment
does not approve or imply approval of any future application that might be submitted.
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page 2 of 17
ANALYSIS
Similar Uses in Zoning District
A zoning district should allow similar uses that will not create land use conflicts. If a zoning
district allow a use that is similar to a new one, it make sense to include the new one in that
district. The similarities referred to are the general type of activity, as well as factors such as the
traffic generation, parking, need for and impact on the city's utilities systems (water, sanitary
sewer, and stormwater management), and potential impacts on other properties.
In considering churches, it's useful to describe the general activities and impacts that coincide
with churches. Generally, a church is a place of assembly where people congregate for various
purposes. The group can be large or small and might participate in religious worship, weddings,
pancake breakfasts, dinners, and other social activities. Churches generate traffic and need
vehicle parking space. If available, it's best that churches connect to municipal water to
accommodate a fire suppression system for the building as well as water needs for groups of
people. Wastewater treatment also is needed.
Both the LB and GB districts currently allow private lodges and clubs as conditional uses. This
would include a VFW or American Legion. The activities that occur at such lodges and clubs
and the potential impacts on their surroundings are very similar to those of churches. Large or
small groups of people assemble for various purposes — social events, meals, etc. They need
parking, they generate traffic, they need water and wastewater treatment
The city's responsibility is to protect public health, safety, and welfare by anticipating and
addressing the potential effects on the surroundings and the community as a whole. This is a
legitimate public purpose in regulating land uses with a zoning ordinance. The exact nature or
purpose for which people assemble within a building is not the concern, as long as it's a legal
activity. Differences between the institutions— purposes, beliefs, or activities— aren't relevant
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000
The "similarity of uses" concept is important in understanding the federal law that prohibits
discrimination against churches. The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of
2000, known by the acronym RLUIPA, requires a city to treat religious uses such as churches the
same as the city treats other similar uses. In the years since its enactment, a number of court
cases have been decided under RLUIPA which provide guidance for compliance with the law.
As discussed above, lodges and clubs are similar to churches in their activities and potential
impacts. In fact, they have been found to be similar uses under this law in several court cases
and therefore a city must regulate them equally. In addition, the courts have decided that
property tax revenue issues are not justifications for treating religious uses differently from
similar uses.
•
•
•
•
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page 3 of 17
Existing Zoning Requirements
Standards for All Conditional Use Permits
Section 2, Subd. 2.7. lists standards that apply to all conditional uses. These read:
7. Standards. The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit
and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds the following
criteria have been met:
a. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the
policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including.
1) Land Use Plan.
2) Transportation Plan.
3) Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans.
4) Local Water Management Plan.
5) Capital Improvement Plan.
6) Policy Plan.
7) Natural Environment Plan.
b. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land
uses of the area.
c. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and
other applicable City Codes.
d. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of
the City when:
1) If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or
B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of
service more than one grade.
2) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by
a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C.
3) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by
a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D.
4) The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing
access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision
developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to
ensure a level of service D or better.
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page 4 of 17
5) Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the
structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed
subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies.
6) The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street
improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement
Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer- financed
improvements to correct any street deficiencies.
7) The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I-
35W/Lake Drive or I- 35E/Main St interchanges. At City discretion, interchange
impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota
Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements
needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the
subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time
frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options,
including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and
other properties, that contribute to traffic at the interchange.
8) The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination.
9) The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply.
10) The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary
sewer system.
11) The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City
funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed
development
e. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of
operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare
because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors.
f. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic
feature of major importance.
These standards/conditions will continue to apply to all conditional uses in the city.
Specific Conditions for Specific Uses
In addition to the standards for all conditional uses, specific conditional uses have specific
conditions that apply. These are listed with the individual uses in the conditional use section of
each zoning district Currently, the zoning ordinance allows churches as conditional uses only in
the rural and residential zoning districts. They are included in the category "public, educational,
•
•
•
•
•
•
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page 5 of 17
and religious buildings ". Note that religious uses often include a church, an associated school, a
community gathering facility, and other such uses. These uses are difficult to separate, and they
have similar needs and potential impacts. This is why they are categorized together.
The specific conditions for this category are:
Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings. Public or semi -public recreational buildings
and neighborhood or community centers; limited to nursery, elementary, junior high and
senior high schools; and religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, mosque,
and synagogues provided that:
a. Side yards shall not be less than fifty (50) feet.
b. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is provided in
compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance
c. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting
directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 5. of this Ordinance and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped
from surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q
of this Ordinance
The ordinance allows "private lodges and clubs" as conditional uses only in the LB and GB
districts. They have their own specific conditions:
Private lodges and clubs provided that:
a. Adequate screening from abutting and adjoining residential uses and landscaping is
provided.
b. Adequate off -street parking and access is provided and that such parking is adequately
screened and landscaped from adjoining and residential uses.
c. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where
applicable by Section 3, Subd. 6. of this Ordinance
The current conditions for these two categories address similar issues: screening from residential
properties, parking, and access. However, there are differences, and it is necessary to analyze the
differences to ensure that churches are not treated on less than equal terms. The requirements
that apply to all uses in the respective zoning districts must be considered as well.
The following tables compare the zoning district requirements and the specific conditions for the
two categories of conditional uses.
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page 6 of 17
•
•
•
LB & GB
districts
Private Lodges and
Clubs
Public, Educational,
Religious Buildings
setbacks
-from street
no differences
side yards shall not be
local street
30'
less than 50':
collector/arterial
40'
• this requirement is
parking lot from street
15'
unequal if on a corner
-rear yard
no differences
no differences
principal building
30'
accessory building
10'
parking lot
10'
-side yard
no differences
side yards shall not be
principal building
10'
less than 50':
accessory building
10'
• this requirement is
parking lot
10'
unequal
-from residential district
35'
no differences
no differences
off-street parking
Restaurants, Cafes,
Church, Theater,
Private Clubs Serving
Auditorium:
Food and/or Drinks, Bars,
lspace for each 3 seats
based on the design
capacity of the main
assembly hall. Facilities
provided in conjunction
with such buildings or
uses shall be subject to
On -Sale Nightclubs:
10 spaces for each 1,000
sf of dining room, plus
1 space for each
employee of max. work
shift
additional requirements
imposed by Ordinance.
off-street loading
"Adequate off-street
loading and service
Regulated in Section 3,
Subd. 6, which applies
everywhere.
entrances are provided
and regulated where
applicable by Section 3,
Subd. 6."
no specific requirements
•
•
•
•
•
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page 7 of 17
Off-street loading requirements are found in Section 3, Subd. 6 of the zoning ordinance. They
require off - street loading space for any structure that "requires the receipt or distribution of
materials or merchandise by trucks or similar vehicles ". This general statement could include
anything and everything. However, the actual loading space that is required is not specified
other than it must be off- street, must have vehicular access, must be screened and landscaped
from abutting and surrounding residential uses, must be 50 feet from an intersection of streets
and must be 50 feet from a residential zoning district. These apply equally to all uses, though it
doesn't hurt to cite them in the specific conditions as well. Because there are no separate
requirements for the conditional uses under consideration, no table was created.
There are different screening requirements, however, and this creates a potential for unequal
treatment. The tables below compare the requirements.
LB & GB
districts
Private Lodges and
Clubs
Public, Educational,
Religious Buildings
height
LB 36'
GB 45'
Cupolas,
belfries, and
church spires
allowed to 60'
by Sec. 3,
Subd. 4.c.
no differences
no differences
building type and
In Section 3, the general provisions, Subd. 4.B.4.
says: "Commercial,
on land within
zoning districts, and
and religious
shall conform with"
this section of the
construction
Industrial, and Institutional. All buildings erected
commercial, industrial and public and semi -public
all institutional buildings (such as public, education,
buildings) in residential and rural zoning districts
the same architectural standards described in
ordinance
However, the LB and GB districts say: "All newly constructed
commercial buildings shall meet the exterior building standards of
Section 3, Subd. 4.B.4 of this Ordinance "
• Though Section 3 applies, the word "commercial" should be
deleted to avoid confusion if public /educational/religious uses
(institutional) are added
Off-street loading requirements are found in Section 3, Subd. 6 of the zoning ordinance. They
require off - street loading space for any structure that "requires the receipt or distribution of
materials or merchandise by trucks or similar vehicles ". This general statement could include
anything and everything. However, the actual loading space that is required is not specified
other than it must be off- street, must have vehicular access, must be screened and landscaped
from abutting and surrounding residential uses, must be 50 feet from an intersection of streets
and must be 50 feet from a residential zoning district. These apply equally to all uses, though it
doesn't hurt to cite them in the specific conditions as well. Because there are no separate
requirements for the conditional uses under consideration, no table was created.
There are different screening requirements, however, and this creates a potential for unequal
treatment. The tables below compare the requirements.
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page 8 of 17
Sec. 3, Subd. 4.Q.
Required Screening, Landscaping, and Buffer Yards.
Comparing
Private Lodges and Clubs to
Public, Educational, Religious
Buildings
Screening. Where any business or industrial use (i.e.,
Private Lodges and Clubs:
structure, parking or storage) abuts property zoned for
"Adequate screening from abutting
residential use, that business or industry shall provide
and adjoining residential uses and
screening along the boundary of the residential property.
landscaping is provided."
Screening shall also be provided where a business or
industry is across the street from a residential zone, but
• Should clarify that a lodge or
not on that side of a business or industry considered to be
club must meet requirements for
the front (as determined by the Zoning Administrator).
"business or industrial use".
All the fencing and screening specifically required by this
(Otherwise, may be unclear if
Ordinance shall be subject to Section 3, Subd. 4.Q. and
Subd 4.Q. applies and what is
shall consist of either a fence or a green belt planting
strip as provided for below:
"adequate screening")
a) A green belt planting strip shall consist of vegetation
Public, Educational, Religious :
and plants and shall be of sufficient width and density to
"Adequate screening from abutting
provide an effective visual screen. This planting strip
residential uses and landscaping is
shall be designed to provide eighty (80) percent opacity
provided in compliance with Section
to a minimum height of six (6) feet at time of planting.
3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance "
Earth mounding or berms may be used but shall not be
used to achieve more than three (3) feet of the required
• Should clarify that must meet
screen. In such cases when planting strips are used in
requirements for "business or
conjunction with berms designed to support plant growth,
plant height may be reduced accordingly such that an
industrial use".
(Otherwise, may be unclear if it
eighty (80) percent visual screen of not less than six (6)
feet in height is maintained. The planting plan and type
includes institutional uses,
making "compliance with
of plantings shall require the approval of the City
Section 3, Subd 4.Q"
CounciL
ambiguous.)
•
LB and GB
districts
Private Lodges and
Clubs
Public, Educational,
Religious Buildings
screening of parking
see Section 3,
Subd 4.Q
"Adequate off - street
parking and access is
provided and that such
parking is adequately
screened and landscaped
from adjoining and
residential uses."
• Should use consistent language
confusion.
"...parking is
adequately screened
and landscaped from
surrounding and
abutting residential
uses in compliance
with Section 3, Subd
4.Q of this Ordinance "
to avoid
•
•
•
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page 9 of 17
Recommended Amendments to Zoning Ordinance
Based on the above analysis, the zoning ordinance should be amended to accomplish the
following:
• Add Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings as conditional uses to the LB and GB
zoning districts.
• Setbacks must be consistent within the same zoning district for both categories: "Public,
Educational, and Religious Buildings" and "Private Lodges and Clubs ". The normal
setbacks from residential districts in the LB and GB zoning districts should apply.
• Delete the term "commercial" from building requirements paragraphs in LB and GB.
• Clarify that a lodge or club and public /educational /religious building must meet screening
requirements for "business or industrial use" listed in Sec. 3, Subd. 4.Q
• Clear up ambiguity for parking screening: to avoid confusion, use consistent language
for lodge or club and public/ educational /religious.
The proposed amendments accomplish these things and create the same conditions for both
categories of uses. The amendments listed below include text to be added, shown as underlined,
and text to be deleted, shown as 5tfikeelit.
1) Add Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings as conditional uses to the LB and GB
zoning districts by adding the following text:
Section 7
Subd. 2 LB, Limited Business, and
Subd. 3 GB, General Business
H. Conditional Uses
Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings. Public or semi -public recreational buildings
and neighborhood or community centers; limited to nursery, elementary, junior high and
senior high schools; and religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, mosque,
and synagogues provided that:
a. Screening from residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with
requirements for business or industrial uses in Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance
b. Adequate off -street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting
directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 5. of this Ordinance
c. Parking is screened and landscaped in compliance with requirements for business or
industrial uses in Section 3, Subd. 4.0 of this Ordinance
—65—
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page l0 of 17
d. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where
applicable by Section 3, Subd. 6. of this Ordinance
2) Amend the conditions specific to Private Lodges and Clubs to ensure consistency with
Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings:
Section 7
Subd. 2 LB, Limited Business, and
Subd. 3 GB, General Business
E. Building Requirements. All newly constructed commercial buildings shall meet the
exterior building standards of Section 3, Subd. 4.B.4 of this Ordinance
H. Conditional Uses
Private Lodges and Clubs
a. Adequate screening from abutting and adjoining residential uses and landscaping is
b. Adequate off street parking and access is provided and that such parking is adequately
a. Screening from residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with
requirements for business or industrial uses in Section 3, Subd. 4.0 of this Ordinance.
b. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting
directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with Section 3..
Subd. 5. of this Ordinance
c. Parking is screened and landscaped in compliance with requirements for business or
industrial uses in Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.
ed. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where
applicable by Section 3, Subd. 6. of this Ordinance.
Liquor Code Issues
The Lino Lakes City Code regulates liquor licenses in Chapter 700. It requires a separation of
1000 feet between a business getting a liquor license and a church or school. This is measured
from front door to front door. The Code exempts some types of schools and the separation is not
applied if the liquor license was granted before the church or school arrives.
•
•
•
•
•
Public, Educational, and Religious Uses in GB & LB
page 11 of 17
The business zoning districts are not huge in Lino Lakes, and many of them stretch along
highway corridors. If a church or school locates in an LB or GB zone and the 1000 ft. distance
is applied, it would eliminate most of the city's business zones as locations for restaurants or
other uses that need a liquor license. This would prohibit many desirable businesses from
locating in Lino Lakes.
Since the business areas were established as locations for businesses, any church or school that
locates in these areas should be expected to be coexist with the business uses. The business uses
might include establishments with liquor licenses. Just as the property line setback distances for
churches/schools and businesses should be equal, other regulations should be equal.
For these reasons, Ordinance 04-09 includes an amendment to the liquor code that removes the
distance requirement from schools and churches located in an LB or GB zoning district.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION
The P & Z Board held a public hearing on the application on July 8. The Board unanimously
recommended approval of the amendments to the zoning ordinance and the liquor code included
in Ordinance No. 04-09.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Ordinance No. 04-09 which:
a) amends the zoning ordinance to allow public, education, and religious buildings in the
LB and GB zones as conditional uses, and
b) amends the liquor code so that the 1000 ft. separation of a liquor license from a
church or school does not apply if the church or school is in an LB or GB zone.
2. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Option 1: Approve Ordinance No. 04 -09
1 g Reading:
Publication:
2 °d Reading:
Effective:
Council Member
moved for adoption of the following ordinance:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 04-09
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
LIMITED BUSINESS AND GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS TO ALLOW PUBLIC,
EDUCATIONAL, AND RELIGIOUS USES AS CONDITIONAL USES
AND
AMENDING SECTION 700 OF THE CITY CODE SO THAT THE REQUIRED
DISTANCE FOR LIQUOR LICENSES SHALL NOT APPLY IF A SCHOOL OR
CHURCH IS IN A LIMITED BUSINESS OR GENERAL BUSINESS ZONING
DISTRICT
Section 1 Findings
1. The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance allows public, educational, and religious buildings as
conditional uses in the Rural and Residential zoning districts.
2. The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance allows private lodges and clubs as conditional uses in the
Limited Business and General Business zoning districts.
3. The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, known by the acronym
RLUIPA, requires a city to treat religious uses such as churches the same as the city treats
other similar uses. Lodges and clubs are similar to public, educational, and religious uses in
their activities and potential impacts.
4. Section 2, Subdivision 1 of the Zoning Ordinance requires consideration of possible adverse
effects of a proposed zoning amendment and that the judgment of a proposed amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors:
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive
Plan.
2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the are&
The Policy Plan chapter of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan lists the following policies
that are relevant to the inclusion of institutional uses in business zones. Such policies
support consistent requirements for similar uses in business zones.
•
•
•
•
•
•
3. Require commercial development in Lino Lakes to meet architectural
performance standards which assure the creation of attractive, functional and
durable structures. Different standards may be established for different areas.
8. Develop commercial and service centers as cohesive, highly interrelated units
with adequate off-street parking.
9. Ensure that service and commercial uses are adequately and appropriately
landscaped according to community requirements as may be amended.
10. Ensure that all service and commercial uses are adequately screened or
buffered from any adjacent residential development.
17. In evaluating commercial sites, factors will be the physical implication of the
commercial land use related to traffic generation, sewer and water demands,
environmental issues and compatibility with neighboring land uses.
In addition, the Land Use Plan chapter of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan lists the
following strategies to be implemented to promote quality commercial areas. These
strategies further support consistent requirements for similar uses in business zones.
1. The City will utilize its zoning regulations to define the range of commercial
land use that may be appropriate for each proposed commercial location.
Through its commercial site planning, the City will require new commercial
development to be compatibly designed with surrounding land uses through
the use of transitional land uses, proper setbacks, building orientation,
screening and landscaping
2. Site access will be controlled to provide safe traffic movement and to reduce
the commercial traffic impacts on residential neighborhoods.
3. The City will promote commercial site designs that emphasize pedestrian
accessibility, shared parking, and green space in an effort to create a customer
friendly environment and promote a high level of business interchange among
local businesses when feasible.
4. Architectural and site standards will be developed and applied to City
commercial development in an effort to establish aesthetic pleasing, high
quality commercial buildings and streetscapes where they apply.
5. Commercial development will be required to be responsive to the
environmental concems of the City with regard to site planning, landscaping,
impervious surfacing, and storm water management.
Ordinance No. 04 -09, page 2
3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein.
Section 2, Subd. 1 includes criteria that must be met by all conditional uses. These
will continue to apply equally to all conditional uses as will all other requirements in
official controls that apply equally to all uses. Each zoning district includes specific
conditional uses with conditions specific to the uses. With the amendments described
herein, the standards in the zoning ordinance will address similar uses equally
4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the City's service capacity.
5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the
property.
Utility demand and traffic generation will continue to be addressed with new and
existing uses, as required by the subdivision, zoning, and other chapters of the city
code and official controls.
5. Residential and rural districts are not typically planned with the infrastructure and other
elements necessary to support higher intensity uses planned for in business districts. It is
appropriate that some requirements in residential and rural zoning districts may be more
restrictive than in business districts to protect the lower intensity residential and rural uses.
6. The Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on the Zoning Ordinance
amendment on July 8, 2009, and recommended approval.
Section 2 Amendment of Zoning Ordinance Approved
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains that Section 7, Subdivisions 2 and 3 of the Zoning
Ordinance are hereby amended as follows (deleted text in Atikeettt, added text in underline), and
subsequent elements within the subdivisions shall be renumbered as appropriate:
Section 7
Subd. 2 LB, Limited Business, and
Subd. 3 GB, General Business
E. Building Requirements. All newly constructed commercial buildings shall meet the
exterior building standards of Section 3, Subd. 4.B.4 of this Ordinance
Ordinance No. 04-09, page 3
—70—
•
•
•
•
•
H. Conditional Uses
Private Lodges and Clubs
a. Adequate screening from abutting and adjoining residential uses and landscaping is
pro tided.
a. Screening from residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with
requirements for business or industrial uses in Section 3, Subd. 4.0 of this Ordinance
b. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting
directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 5. of this Ordinance
c. Parking is screened and landscaped in compliance with requirements for business or
industrial uses in Section 3, Sub& 4.0 of this Ordinance
ed. Adequate off -street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where
applicable by Section 3, Subd. 6. of this Ordinance
Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings. Public or semi -public recreational buildings
and neighborhood or community centers; limited to nursery, elementary, junior high and
senior high schools; and religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, mosque,
and synagogues provided that:
a. Screening from residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with
requirements for business or industrial uses in Section 3, Subd. 4.0 of this Ordinance
b. Adequate off -street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting
directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with Section 3,
Subd. 5. of this Ordinance
c. Parking is screened and landscaped in compliance with requirements for business or
industrial uses in Section 3, Subd. 4.0 of this Ordinance
d. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where
applicable by Section 3, Subd. 6. of this Ordinance
—7 1 —
Ordinance No. 04-09, page 4
Section 3 Amendment of Chapter 700 of the City Code Regulating Liquor Licenses
Approved
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains that Section 701.07 of the City Code is hereby amended
as follows (added text in underline),
§ 701.07 PLACES INELIGIBLE FOR LICENSE.
(1) General. No license shall be issued for any place of any business ineligible for a
license under state law.
(2) Delinquent taxes and charges. No license shall be granted for operation on any
premises for which taxes, assessments or other financial claims of the city are delinquent
and unpaid.
(3) Distance from school or church. No license shall be granted within 1,000 feet of
any school or within 1,000 feet of any church. The distance shall be measured from the
main entrance of the school or church to the main entrance of the applicant's place of
business.
(a) For the purposes of the separation restriction in this division, a school is a
building that is principally used as a place where 25 or more persons receive a full course of
educational instruction and the educational instruction is provided on a daily basis by an
established school board or church. This does not include any post- secondary or post -high
school educational building, including any college or any vocational- technical college. Nor
does the separation apply to a daycare or early childhood facility, where children typically
are under constant supervision while at the facility and when traveling to and from the
facility.
(b) The establishment of a school or church within the separation distance after an
original liquor license application has been granted shall not, in and of itself, render the
premises ineligible for renewal of the license.
(c) This separation distance restriction shall not be applicable if a school or church is
located in a Limited Business or General Business zoning district.
Section 4 Zoning Ordinance and City Code Stand As Amended
As above amended, the Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously
amended. As above amended, the City Code shall stand as initially passed and previously
amended.
Ordinance No. 04-09, page 5
_72_
•
•
•
•
Section 4 In Effect According to City Charter
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according
to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Attest Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2009.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
Ordinance No. 04-09, page 6
•
•
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
C. C. MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA ITEM 6 E
Jeff Smyser
July 27, 2009
Ordinance No. 05 -09: Amending Planned Unit
Development Section of Zoning Ordinance to Remove Six -
Month Limit on Extensions for Submitting Final
Development Plan
A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a means of designing development as an integrated,
coordinated unit as opposed to a parcel by parcel, piecemeal, approach. The zoning ordinance
includes requirements for a PUD in Section 2, Subdivision 10. The "development stage plan"
includes a preliminary plat. The final plat and other more defined elements of a PUD are
included in the "final plan ". The ordinance currently requires submittal of the final plan within
one year of approval of the development stage plan. Beyond this, the ordinance limits an
extension of time to six months. The proposed ordinance amendment would eliminate this six -
month limit on the extension beyond the initial one year period.
ANALYSIS
Section 2, Subd. 10.F.8.g. includes the time frame requirements for submittal of the final plan.
This paragraph is shown below, with the subject limitation shown in boldface:
Limitation on Development Plan Approval. Unless a Final Plan covering the area
designated in the Development Stage Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed
within one (1) year from the date the City Council grants Development Stage Plan
approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file Final Plans and to proceed with
development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and/or an approved
Development Stage Plan, the approval shall expire. The City Council may at its
discretion, extend for not more than six months, the filing deadline for any Final
Plan when, for good cause shown, such extension is necessary. In any case where
Development Plan approval expires, the City Council may adopt a resolution repealing
the Development Stage Plan approval for that portion of the PUD that has not received
Final Plan approval and re- establishing the zoning and other Code provisions that would
otherwise be applicable.
The intent of this limit on the extension is to ensure that the project does not languish too long
after approval of the development stage plan with its preliminary plat However, the current
Extension for PUD
page 2
economic situation has halted the progress on many development projects because the market is
not operating well. Three PUDs received approval of their development stage plans, and already
were granted the six -month extension beyond the one year for submitting the final plans. The
six -month limit on extensions would require the City to act to repeal the preliminary approvals.
The removal of this six -month limit allows these projects to remain viable.
Two of the PUD projects that have received preliminary approval include the preservation of
important ecological areas and with permanent easements and conservation management plans
for the easement areas. These projects are important to the City. They are steps in the
implementation of the "Parks, Natural Open Space, Greenways and Trail System Plan", which
has evolved into the "Resource Management System Plan" described in chapter two of the new
comprehensive plan.
The third project is a commercial PUD near the 35E interchange. This area is an important part
of the city for providing retail services to the community and the corresponding property tax
revenue.
Projects that have received preliminary plat approval under the subdivision chapter of the city
code but that are not PUDs are not restricted to a six -month extension. The subdivision chapter
requires the final plat to be submitted within one year of preliminary plat approval, "unless an
extension is requested in writing, and for good cause, is granted by the City Council."
( §1001.055 (2)) There is no time limit on the extension that the Council can approve.
Recommended Amendment to Zoning Ordinance
The proposed zoning ordinance amendment is to delete the six -month limit. The amended
paragraph would read as follows, with the deleted portion shown in s text and inserted
text is shown as underline.
Limitation on Development Plan Approval. Unless a Final Plan covering the area
designated in the Development Stage Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed
within one (1) year from the date the City Council grants Development Stage Plan
approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file Final Plans and to proceed with
development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and/or an approved
Development Stage Plan, the approval shall expire. The City Council may at its
discretion; extend for six -month intervals the filing deadline
for any Final Plan when, for good cause shown, such extension is necessary. In any case
where Development Plan approval expires, the City Council may adopt a resolution
repealing the Development Stage Plan approval for that portion of the PUD that has not
received Final Plan approval and re- establishing the zoning and other Code provisions
that would otherwise be applicable. The City Council may also extend a filing deadline
after the expiration date.
—75—
•
•
Extension for PUD
page 3
• PLANNING & ZONING BOARD RECOMIVIENDATION
The P & Z held a public hearing on July 8 and recommended the amendment with a unanimous
vote.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Ordinance No. 05 -09 removing the six -month limit for extensions of the period
allowed for submitting a PUD final plan.
2. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Option 1
•
•
1s` Reading:
Publication:
2nd Reading:
Effective:
Council Member
moved for adoption of the following ordinance-
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ORDINANCE NO. 05-09
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REMOVE 1 H
SIX -MONTH MAXIMUM ON EXTENSIONS FOR SUBMITTING'1'HE FINAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Section 1 Findings
1. Section 2, Subd. 10 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance includes the requirements for a
Planned Unit Development.
2. Section 2, Subd. 10.F.8.g. includes the time frame requirements for submittal of the final plan
for a Planned Unit Development. This requires that the final plan be submitted within one-
year of approval of the development stage plan. It also allows an extension for not more than
six months.
3. Section 2, Subdivision l of the Zoning Ordinance requires that the City must consider
possible adverse effects of a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and judgment
shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors:
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive
Plan. This amendment does not involve a rezoning of a property, but the removal of a
time extension restriction. The restriction applies only to planned unit developments.
Other platting projects, with timelines governed locally by the subdivision and platting
chapter of the city code, do not have such a restriction.
2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area.
This removal of a time extension restriction will have no effect on the compatibility of
any project with its surrounding uses.
3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. This
removal of a time extension restriction is an amendment of a performance standard. No
compliance with other standards will be affected.
4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the City's service capacity.
_77_
•
•
•
•
•
Ordinance No. 05 -09, page 2
5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the
property.
This removal of a time extension restriction will have no effect on a project's needs for or
effects on City utilities or transportation infrastructure or other services.
4. The maximum of six - months for extension of the filing of a final Planned Unit Development
plan limits City Council discretion and has the potential to prevent the initiation or
completion of a project deemed to have public value by the Council and the community.
5. The Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on the Zoning Ordinance
amendment on July 8, 2009, and recommended approval.
Section 2 Amendment of Zoning Ordinance Approved
The City Council of Lino Lakes ordains that Section 2, Subd. 10.F.8.g. of the Zoning Ordinance
is hereby amended to delete the text shown in strikeout and add text that is underlined:
Limitation on Development Plan Approval. Unless a Final Plan covering the area
designated in the Development Stage Plan as the first stage of the PUD has been filed
within one (1) year from the elate the City Council grants Development Stage Plan
approval, or in any case where the applicant fails to file Final Plans and to proceed with
development in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance and/or an approved
Development Stage Plan, the approval shall expire. The City Council may at its
discretion, extend for six -month intervals , the filing deadline
for any Final Plan when, for good cause shown, such extension is necessary. The City
Council may approve such an extension after the deadline date passes. In any case where
Development Plan approval expires and no extension has been approved, the City
Council may adopt a resolution repealing the Development Stage Plan approval for that
portion of the PUD that has not received Final Plan approval and re- establishing the
zoning and other Code provisions that would otherwise be applicable.
Section 3 Zoning Ordinance Stands As Amended
As above amended, the Zoning Ordinance shall stand as initially passed and previously
amended.
Section 4 In Force According to City Charter
This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according
to the Lino Lakes City Charter.
Ordinance No. 05 -09, page 3
John Bergeson, Mayor
Attest Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2009.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6F
STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 27, 2009
TOPIC: Resolution No. 09-50, Accepting Plans and
Specifications and Authorizing a Request for
Quotes, 2009 Surface Water Management
Project
VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority
BACKGROUND:
After storm sewer, storm water ponds and drainage ways are constructed, they
require periodic maintenance to ensure their effectiveness. To maintain the
effectiveness of the storm sewer system, cleaning of pipe sections, catch basins,
manholes and flared ends where silt has accumulated must be completed.
The City conducted its yearly review of 20% of the City's MS4 outfalls, sediment
basins, storm sewers, and ponds to comply with NPDES requirements.
The 2009 Surface Water Management project consists of ditch and pipe repairs,
pipe extensions and the cleaning of pipe sections, catch basins, manholes and
flared ends. The projects were identified by this years NPDES review of storm
sewers, public works identified projects, and through resident concems as shown
on the attached map.
The project schedule is as follows:
City Council Accepts Plans and Specifications July 27, 2009
City Council Request for Quotes July 27, 2009
City Council Awards Contract August 24, 2009
Construction Begins September, 2009
City staff has prepared the plans and specifications for this work and is
requesting Council approval to make a request for quotes.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Resolution No. 09-50 be adopted.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 09-50
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
AUTHORIZING REQUEST FOR QUOTES— 2009 SURFACE WATER
MANAGEMENT PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
2009 Surface Water Management Project, and has presented such plans and
specifications to the Council for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
The City Engineer will send out a request for quotes. The quotes will be received
by the Clerk until 10:00 a.m. on Friday, August 14, 2009, at which time they will
be publicly opened in the City Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be
tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, August
24, 2009, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. Any bidder whose
responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an
opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No quotes will
be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash
deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for five
(5) percent of the amount of such bid.
John Bergeson, Mayor
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of July, 2009.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duty passed and adopted.
•
04 PROJECT
1 #8
il
1E1 iiiillfiliFili WU = 1-511SitSIISillillifilllEiliillili
I
ILIUM ! MI
PROJECT #11
11,4* IMPAII
PROJECT
I i
, . ..e...
in ti iiiiimerio
Hi i IHNIIF-
. Nil I litAill
1111
• 0, IF, . HA: 1 -41111
.v , PP"-
I. 0'
okz: 1
... • . fill
r•-• op!
wr,I ripordoo- -
41"!/-'--/°7-4111
re. if( 107a111
7
P zeitil. - 111
Itt
j PROJECT #6
--j PROJECT #5
' •
14
e til
76 Ah ix 35 E ,
n WEI AM-
i
MO 7.11.1
mil Min
Irr vregt.-- ...II
N----
1611"iiik *,-"::::11,
---,si
.;,..
PROJECT
11M1-LZ-1-1-111-1
Isliarialroi
7009 Surface Water Managment Projects
CIT OF
INS[ KES
JULY 27, 2009
TKDA PROJECT NO. 14292.004
TKDA
ENGNETRAIG • ARD1:1,,-.1:Illq • PLA'AN:.
Th'g m TbdgLi