Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/03/2009 Council Packet• • • REVISED WORK SESSION AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, August 3, 2009 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Community Room (not televised) 5:30 P.M. 1. Charter Commission Budget Request 2. Proposed Charter Amendment (televising meetings) 3. I- 35E/14 Funding/JPA with Anoka County 4. Liquor License Investigation Fee 5. Centennial Utilities Commission — Robin Doege (city rep) Review Regular Agenda Adjourn PAGE 1 • • WORK SESSION AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, August 3, 2009 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Community Room (not televised) 5:30 P.M. 1. Charter Commission Budget Request 2. Proposed Charter Amendment (televising meetings) 3. I- 35E/14 fmancing/JPA with Anoka County 4. Liquor License Investigation Fee Review Regular Agenda Adjourn PAGE 1 WS — Item #1 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item #1 Date: August 3, 2009 To: City Council From: Julie Bartell Re: Charter Commission Budget Background The Lino Lakes Charter Commission has submitted the attached letter requesting additional funding in 2009. The council received this request at their work session on July 27, 2009 and referred the matter for discussion at the regular August work session. Requested Council Direction Staff requests direction on the matter of additional 2009 funding for the Charter Commission. Attachment(s) Letter of July 24, 2009 from the Lino Lakes Charter Commission 1 • • • Lino Lakes Charter Commission 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Mayor John Bergeson 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 HAND DELIVERED July 24, 2009 Dear Honorable Mayor Bergeson, On July 23, 2009, the Lino Lakes Charter Commission voted to develop Charter Amendments for the November 2009 election. On behalf of the Commission, I formally request additional funding in the amount of $4,000.00 for 2009, exclusively for legal services pertaining to amending the City Charter. The primary proposal to be developed would be a Charter amendment that would include a limit on property tax increases. Currently, the Commission has less than $21.00 remaining in its budget. This situation occurs despite letting our regular (professional) minute -taker go, and taking the minutes ourselves. As you know, the Charter Commission Members do not receive any compensation. The 2009 budget for the Charter Commission has been sharply reduced by the City Council, from over $7,000 in recent years to $1,500 for 2009. Our current operating budget is now roughly one -third of the amount that the City budgeted to the Commission in the 1990's (without factoring for inflation). During the 2009 budgeting process last fall, upon learning of the proposed budget cut, the Commission requested that the Council allow sufficient funding for legal services pertaining to an amendment in its budget. The Council denied that request at that time, while making assurances that if the Commission needed additional money beyond what was budgeted for 2009, then the money would be available and could easily be taken from the contingency fund (if the Council so stipulated). I respectfully request that this matter be added to the July 27, 2009 Council Work Session and approved that same day. Thank you for your consideration and attention to this urgent matter. I apologize for the short notice; however, the City Council is allowed to make last- minute changes to the existing agenda. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to assist in this process. Co Caroline Dahl Chair, Lino Lakes Charter Commission cc: Council. member Kathi Gallup Council member Jeff O'Donnell Council member Jeff Reinert Council member Dan Stoltz City Clerk Julie Bartell Acting City Administrator Dan Tesch • • WS — Item #2 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item #2 Date: August 3, 2009 To: City Council From: Julie Bartell Re: Proposed Charter Amendment Background On July 13, 2009 the Lino Lakes Charter Commission submitted the attached charter amendment and indicated that this amendment should be considered a proposal under Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12, Subd. 7, Amendment by ordinance. The proposed amendment was distributed to the council at their work session that evening, thus commencing the statute defined schedule for consideration of this type of amendment. Staff has prepared and attached to this report a timeline (schedule) indicating deadlines and possible dates for the following process: .- Publication of a public hearing notice on the amendment (must be published prior to August 13). If the council authorizes a hearing this evening, a notice would appear in the Quad Community Press on August 11. > The date of the public hearing must be established no sooner than two weeks but within one month of publication of the hearing notice on August 11. This means the hearing must be held on or between the dates of August 25 through September 11. This does present an issue since there is no regular council meeting (other than a work session on September 8) scheduled during this time period. > Within one month of the public hearing, the council must vote on the proposed charter amendment ordinance (regular council meetings in September are scheduled for the 14th and 28th). Statute states that the ordinance is enacted if it receives an affirmative vote of all members of the council. Section 3.05 of the City Charter establishes certain procedures on adoption of ordinances including a requirement for two readings at least 14 days apart. The city attorney has been asked for an opinion as to whether this applies to this type of charter amendment ordinance since the statute seems to imply that enact requires just one unanimous vote of the council. 1 > If the ordinance is enacted, there is a 90 -day delay before the amendment becomes effective during which a 60 -day period is allowed for submission of a registered voter petition for referendum (thus commencing a new process for ballot consideration). Upon receipt of this proposed charter amendment on July 13, the council also requested that staff gather information on the cost of implementing the additional services called for by the amendment. In response, the cost for video technician services is $12 per hour (with a 3 hour minimum). Requested Council Direction Staff is requesting that the council review the schedule for consideration of the proposed charter amendment, direct staff to prepare and publish the appropriate hearing notice, and schedule a special city council meeting for the purpose of conducting a public hearing. Staff is also requesting direction on preparation of the amendment. At this point the amendment is in the form of a letter from the charter commission and it should be reformatted to the properly as a charter amendment ordinance. Upon receipt of the proposed amendment, it was immediately forwarded to City Attomey Joe Langel with a request that he review and verify its status as a proper amendment request. His attached response indicates that the subject of the amendment is an appropriate consideration. He has questioned, however, the wording of the amendment. An additional legal opinion was received that indicates further questions about the language of the proposed amendment. Attachment(s) 1. Letter from Charter Commission proposing charter amendment 2. Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12. 3. Timeline for consideration of 2009 charter amendment 4. Communication from City Attorney Joseph Langel 5. Communication from Attomey Michael Dougherty 2 • • • iverviD Colit n 01 ,0 s pecfie-d- • Vial-it Sion . 1 -1 3 - 2_arr,, • Lino Lakes Charter Commission 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Mayor Bergeson 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 HAND DELIVERED July 13, 2009 Honorable Mayor Bergeson, RECEIVED UL 1 1 2009 CITY OF LINO LAKES To increase Lino Lakes city information available to citizens and to promote transparency in our local government, the Charter Commission voted on 7/9/09 to recommend that the City Council adopt the following by Ordinance pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 410.12 Subd. 7. The following amendment would be added to Charter 3, Section 3.01 of the City Charter. "All regular open council meetings, the Open Mike portion, and council work sessions shall be televised. Should the City Council determine it is necessary to exempt a given council meeting or council work session from this procedure, they may do so by motion." Cordially, Caroline Dahl, Chair Lino Lakes Charter Commission cc: Council member Kathi Gallup Council member Jeff O'Donnell Council member Jeff Reinert Council member Dan Stoltz City Clerk Julie Bartell Acting City Administrator Dan Tesch 410.12, 2008 Minnesota Statutes Page 1 of 3 • • • 2008 Minnesota Statutes 410.12 AMENDMENTS. Subdivision 1. Proposals. The charter commission may propose amendments to such charter and shall do so upon the petition of voters equal in number to five percent of the total votes cast at the last previous state general election in the city. Proposed charter amendments must be submitted at least 12 weeks before the general election. Only registered voters are eligible to sign the petition. All petitions circulated with respect to a charter amendment shall be uniform in character and shall have attached thereto the text of the proposed amendment in full; except that in the case of a proposed amendment containing more than 1,000 words, a true and correct copy of the same may be filed with the city clerk, and the petition shall then contain a summary of not less than 50 nor more than 300 words setting forth in substance the nature of the proposed amendment. Such summary shall contain a statement of the objects and purposes of the amendment proposed and an outline of any proposed new scheme or frame work of government and shall be sufficient to inform the signers of the petition as to what change in government is sought to be accomplished by the amendment. The summary, together with a copy of the proposed amendment, shall first be submitted to the charter commission for its approval as to form and substance. The commission shall within ten days after such submission to it, return the same to the proposers of the amendment with such modifications in statement as it may deem necessary in order that the summary may fairly comply with the requirements above set forth. Subd. la. Alternative methods of charter amendment. A home rule charter may be amended only by following one of the alternative methods of amendment provided in subdivisions 1 to 7. Subd. 2. Petitions. The signatures to such petition need not all be appended to one paper, but to each separate petition there shall be attached an affidavit of the circulator thereof as provided by this section. A petition must contain each petitioner's signature in ink or indelible pencil and must indicate after the signature the place of residence by street and number, or other description sufficient to identify the place. There shall appear on each petition the names and addresses of five electors of the city, and on each paper the names and addresses of the same five electors, who, as a committee of the petitioners, shall be regarded as responsible for the circulation and filing of the petition. The affidavit attached to each petition shall be as follows: State of ) County of ) ss. being duly sworn, deposes and says that the affiant, and the affiant only, personally circulated the foregoing paper, that all the signatures appended thereto were made in the affiant's presence, and that the affiant believes them to be the genuine signatures of the persons whose names they purport to be. Signed (Signature of Circulator) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Notary Public (or other officer) httnc•/hxnxnx, revicnr 1Pa state rnn 11c /ctatnteci ?ir1 =41 0 12 7/13/2009 410.12, 2008 Minnesota Statutes Page 2 of 3 authorized to administer oaths The foregoing affidavit shall be strictly construed and any affiant convicted of swearing falsely as regards any particular thereof shall be punishable in accordance with existing law. Subd. 3. May be assembled as one petition. All petition papers for a proposed amendment shall be assembled and filed with the charter commission as one instrument. Within ten days after such petition is transmitted to the city council, the city clerk shall determine whether each paper of the petition is properly attested and whether the petition is signed by a sufficient number of voters. The city clerk shall declare any petition paper entirely invalid which is not attested by the circulator thereof as required in this section. Upon completing an examination of the petition, the city clerk shall certify the result of the examination to the council. If the city clerk shall certify that the petition is insufficient the city clerk shall set forth in a certificate the particulars in which it is defective and shall at once notify the committee of the petitioners of the findings. A petition may be amended at any time within ten days after the making of a certificate of insufficiency by the city clerk, by filing a supplementary petition upon additional papers signed and filed as provided in case of an original petition. The city clerk shall within five days after such amendment is filed, make examination of the amended petition, and if the certificate shall show the petition still to be insufficient, the city clerk shall file it in the city clerk's office and notify the committee of the petitioners of the fmdings and no further action shall be had on such insufficient petition. The finding of the insufficiency of a petition shall not prejudice the filing of a new petition for the same purpose. Subd. 4. Election. Amendments shall be submitted to the qualified voters at a general or special election and published as in the case of the original charter. The form of the ballot shall be fixed by the governing body. The statement of the question on the ballot shall be sufficient to identify the amendment clearly and to distinguish the question from every other question on the ballot at the same time. If 51 percent of the votes cast on any amendment are in favor of its adoption, copies of the amendment and certificates shall be filed, as in the case of the original charter and the amendment shall take effect in 30 days from the date of the election or at such other time as is fixed in the amendment. Subd. 5. Amendments proposed by council. The council of any city having a home rule charter may propose charter amendments to the voters by ordinance. Any ordinance proposing such an amendment shall be submitted to the charter commission. Within 60 days thereafter, the charter commission shall review the proposed amendment but before the expiration of such period the commission may extend the time for review for an additional 90 days by filing with the city clerk its resolution determining that an additional time for review is needed. After reviewing the proposed amendment, the charter commission shall approve or reject the proposed amendment or suggest a substitute amendment. The commission shall promptly notify the council of the action taken. On notification of the charter commission's action, the council may submit to the people, in the same manner as provided in subdivision 4, the amendment originally proposed by it or the substitute amendment proposed by the charter commission. The amendment shall become effective only when approved by the voters as provided in subdivision 4. If so approved it shall be filed in the same manner as other amendments. Nothing in this subdivision precludes the charter commission from proposing charter amendments in the manner provided by subdivision 1. Subd. 6. Amendments, cities of the fourth class. The council of a city of the fourth class having a home rule charter may propose charter amendments by ordinance without submission to the charter commission. Such ordinance, if enacted, shall be adopted by at least a four -fifths vote of all its • • • httns : / /www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us /statutes / ?id= 410.12 7/1 10(1(19 410.12, 2008 Minnesota Statutes Page 3 of members after a public hearing upon two weeks' published notice containing the text of the proposed amendment and shall be approved by the mayor and published as in the case of other ordinances. The council shall submit the proposed amendment to the people in the manner provided in subdivision 4, but not sooner than three months after the passage of the ordinance. The amendment becomes effective only when approved by the voters as provided in subdivision 4. If so approved, it shall be filed in the same manner as other amendments. Subd. 7. Amendment by ordinance. Upon recommendation of the charter commission the city council may enact a charter amendment by ordinance. Within one month of receiving a recommendation to amend the charter by ordinance, the city must publish notice of a public hearing on the proposal and the notice must contain the text of the proposed amendment. The city council must hold the public hearing on the proposed charter amendment at least two weeks but not more than one month after the notice is published. Within one month of the public hearing, the city council must vote on the proposed charter amendment ordinance. The ordinance is enacted if it receives an affirmative vote of all members of the city council and is approved by the mayor and published as in the case of other ordinances. An ordinance amending a city charter shall not become effective until 90 days after passage and publication or at such later date as is fixed in the ordinance. Within 60 days after passage and publication of such an ordinance, a petition requesting a referendum on the ordinance may be filed with the city clerk. The petition must be signed by registered voters equal in number to at least five percent of the registered voters in the city or 2,000, whichever is less. If the requisite petition is filed within the prescribed period, the ordinance shall not become effective until it is approved by the voters as in the case of charter amendments submitted by the charter commission, the council, or by petition of the voters, except that the council may submit the ordinance at any general or special election held at least 60 days after submission of the petition, or it may reconsider its action in adopting the ordinance. As far as practicable the requirements of subdivisions 1 to 3 apply to petitions submitted under this section, to an ordinance amending a charter, and to the filing of such ordinance when approved by the voters. History: (1286) RL s 756; 1907 c 199 s 1; 1911 c 343 s 1; 1939 c 292 s 1; 1943 c 227 s 1; 1949 c 122 s 1; 1959 c 305 s 3,4; 1961 c 608 s 5,6; 1969 c 1027 s 3; 1973 c 503 s 1 -4; 1986 c 444; 1998 c 254 art 1 s 107; 1999 c 132 s 42; 2005 c 93 s 1; 2008 c 331 s 7 https : / /www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us /statutes / ?id= 410.12 7/13/2009 D £ m w i o ¢ o @ # O. al m c >2 _ U N L � & O f l va c O 0) E /C c E < c 2 �: C - c 2 .■ E CZ 0 ¢ m _ submission of referendum petition \ \ 0 ( � .E { '/ -0 /5 \ \/§\ ct eL �L) -0 0 Q// \/ §522 - E ƒ j Julie Bartell From: Sent: �To: Subject: Hi Julie, Joseph J. Langel [jlangel @ratwiklaw.com] Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:29 PM Julie Bartell Charter amendment Following our brief conversation last night, I reviewed the statutory authority for charter amendments and charter commissions in general. Minn. Stat. section 410.07, which provides authority for the commission, is written quite broadly. It allows the commission to "prescribe methods of procedure in respect to the operation of the government..." which would encompass the amendment currently under consideration. As I said last night, however, I would have written the amendment a little differently. Its up to the Council if it wants to suggest that the Commission withdraw it and modify it before resubmission. Joe Joseph J. Langel Ratwik, Roszak & Maloney, P.A. 300 U.S. Trust Building 730 Second Avenue S. Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel (612) 339 -0060 • Fax (612) 339 -0038 The information contained in this electronic message is attorney - client privileged and /or confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) to whom this electronic message is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this electronic communication or any attachment thereto is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, you should immediately return it to us and delete the message from your system. Thank you. • • • LARRY S. SEVERSON JAMES F. SHELDON# MICHAEL G. DOUGHERTY* MICHAEL E. MOLENDA# LOREN M. SOLFEST *$ SHARON K. HILLS ROBERT B. BAUER* TERRENCE A. MERRITT$ ANNETTE M. MARGARIT STEPHEN A. LING* July 27, 2009 SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERTY & MOLENDA, P.A. Dan Tesch, City Administrator City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 600 7300 WEST 147TH STREET APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 -4517 (952) 432-3136 TELEFAX NUMBER (952) 432 -3780 www.seversonsheldon.com Re: Proposed Charter Commission Amendment Our File No. 10555 -28517 Dear Mr. Tesch: GARY L. HUUSKO# CHRISTINE J. CASSELLIUS$ BRIAN J. WISDORF* MICHAEL D. KLEMM#* EMILY FOX WILLIAMS MATTHEW J. SCHAAP THOMAS R. DONELY JESSICA L. SANBORN RYAN J. HIES WILLIAM M. TOPKA ERIN. E. BOERSCHEL Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the proposed amendment to the City's Charter, which was hand delivered by letter to City Hall on July 13, 2009. According to the letter, on July 9, 2009, the Charter Commission voted to recommend an amendment by ordinance to the Charter. The proposed Charter amendment reads as follows: All regular open council meetings, the Open Mike portion, and council work sessions shall be televised. Should the City Council determine it is necessary to exempt a given council meeting or council work session from this procedure, they may do so by motion. We note that the published agenda for the July 9, 2009, meeting does not mention discussion of a proposed Charter amendment; however, the special meeting notice for July 23, 2009, does indicate that an update from a subcommittee on a possible Charter amendment will be discussed at that meeting. The July 13, 2009, letter does not indicate the number of members present or what the vote was on the amendment. There is nothing in the Charter, Charter Commission Bylaws, or Minnesota Statutes Section 410.07 which specifically addresses Charter Commission voting requirements on amendments to the City Charter, so a majority vote of the members present at a meeting (assuming a quorum exists) appears to be sufficient.' City staff may want to confirm there was the required quorum and majority vote of those present approved the amendment. "Amendment by ordinance. Upon recommendation of the charter commission the city council may enact a charter amendment by ordinance." Minn. Stat §410.12 subd. 7. INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEYS ALSO LICENSED IN IOWA, WISCONSIN AND MISSOURI QUALIFIED NEUTRAL UNDER RULE 114 OF THE MINNESOTA GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE #REGISTERED PATENT ATTORNEY *MSBA BOARD CERTIFIED REAL PROPERTY SPECIALIST BO ©BPD Dan Tesch, City Administrator City of Lino Lakes Page 2 July 27, 2009 A city's charter may "prescribe methods of procedure in respect to the operation of the government thereby created, * * *." Minn. Stat. §410.07. While neither state statute nor the City's Charter defines "operation of the government," electronic recordings of council meetings are the subject of legislative requirements (See Chapt. 13D, Open Meeting Laws). While placing a requirement to televise City Council proceedings in the City's governing document is unusual, such a requirement does not violate Minnesota law. However, the proposed ordinance is vague. The language of the proposal raises the following issues and concerns: (1) "regular open council meetings " - What does this mean? There is no lawful provision for any regular closed meetings. (2) "the Open Mike (sic) portion " -Is this portion occurring outside of the regular council meeting? Does the use of the term create a requirement to continue to have an "Open Mike" item on every agenda? "council work sessions" — We assume that this is a term used to denote council meetings where no action by the council occurs. However, the term is neither found in state statute nor the City's Charter. If the dates for these type of sessions are part of a schedule adopted by the council, they are regular meetings. Otherwise, the sessions would be classified as special meetings and are subject to the requirements of Chapt. 13D.04 of the statutes. Does the use of the term "council work sessions" create a requirement to continue to have "council work sessions "? (3) If the council establishes committees or subcommittees, are such gatherings council work sessions? Is the term meant to imply only a gathering of the council as a whole? If you have any other questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Cordially, SEVERSON _ 1 _ ON, DOUGHERTY & MOLENDA, P.A. fchael G. 11 ou_. • WS — Item 3 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item 3 Date: Council Work Session, August 3, 2009 To: City Council From: Michael Grochala Re: 35E/CSAH 14 Interchange Funding Background As previously discussed staff has continued to work with Anoka County regarding the cost participation for the I35E /CSAH 14 interchange. At the July 6, 2009 work session staff reported that the city's share, based on a cost split of 50% of construction and 100% of land acquisition, was $7.8 million. Staff shared that the proposed cost share, was not viable from both a funding and financing standpoint. As the council is aware we have proceeded with the improvement process assuming a $5.5 million contribution. Anoka has recently proposed new parameters for the agreement that are more consistent with our position. The cost share is based on the original cost participation percentages discussed in 2005 regarding construction of both interchanges. Under this scenario the city had a 35% share of total project costs and the county had a 24% share for both the Lake Drive /35W interchange and the Main/35E interchange projects. Maintaining these same percentages and adjusting for actual costs incurred, increased construction costs and additional state and federal shares establishes a new base cost of $5.45 million for the city. The county's share would be $3.8 million. Overruns/Underruns: Since the local share of the improvements is a 60% city / 40% county split all cost overruns / underruns are proposed to be based on this same percentage. New Grants: Both the city and county have grant applications out for consideration. If any are successful the grant amounts would be based on the same percentage. Cash Flow: The county will consider carrying the note for the full term of the bond. However, this will negatively act against the county's bond capacity. It is likely that an additional interest surcharge would be added if this is in the agreement. Alternatively, the county would carry the city's share of costs for five years with the city paying interest as it accrues. 1 Credits: The agreement could include additional opportunities for the city to earn credits based toward our share. City and county staff have explored options including county road turnbacks and land in lieu of cash for a future salt storage / truck garage. These are just examples but show how the county is willing to be flexible in addressing the cost share. The credit option also provides the city with a "contingency" to address potential overruns and/or assessment adjustments if necessary. Both county and city staff feel positive about these terms. The county is close to finalizing right -of -way costs (most properties are ready to settle). Additionally, the county has seen construction bids come in significantly lower than estimates. Based on this and the possibility of receiving additional grants we are hopeful that the $5 5 million dollar figure is on the high side. Any reduction in the city share would then result in lower assessment figures for benefited properties. Council Direction Staff is requesting council consideration of the proposed agreement parameters. Based on the council response staff and our consultant team will work with Anoka County to draft the Joint Powers Agreement. 2 WS — Item #4 WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT Work Session Item #4 Date: August 3, 2009 To: City Council From: Julie Bartell Re: Liquor License Investigation Fee Background As allowed by state statute, the city has established fees for licensing and regulation of liquor sales (including 3.2 malt beverages). The city's adopted fee schedule includes both a license fee and a fee for background investigations. As staff has reported previously, those applying for licenses in Lino Lakes are charged a fee to cover the city's cost to conduct a background investigation for their initial license application and for their annual renewal. The Lino Lakes Police Department conducts these investigations. The annual liquor licensing period for the city runs from July 1 through June 30 so this year's renewal activities have just been completed. One licensee, Tom Wilzbacher of Red Oak Steaks and Wines, Inc. has paid less than the amount of fees due. He is declining to pay the annual background investigation fee of $250 (individual). Staff has sought the advice of the City Attorney in this matter. City Attorney Joseph Langel advises that while state statute clearly requires a background check on initial liquor license applications and allows the city to charge a fee up to $500, it makes background investigation for license renewals optional. A renewal investigation may be undertaken if the Council "deems it in the public interest." While it can be inferred from past practice and Council discussions that the Council finds such investigations to be generally appropriate, there is no record of a formal decision to that effect. Moreover, Ordinance Section 701.05, subd. 1, seems to call for more of a case -by -case approach. It states that a renewal investigation "on a particular application" shall be undertaken if the Council deems it in the public interest. The practice, however, has not been to make such determinations on specific applications. 1 Requested Council Direction The City's ordinance and its actual practice need to be consistent with each other and with state law. The City Attorney is therefore recommending that the following issues be addressed by the Council: o Does the City wish to conduct a background investigations for liquor license renewals? o If so, would it be on all renewals as a matter of policy or only with respect to particular applications? • If on all renewals (as is the current practice), then a resolution to that effect that explains the rationale for the renewal investigations should be approved by the Council and the liquor ordinance should be amended to remove the "particular application" language. • If on only particular renewal applications, then a resolution is not needed and the ordinance can remain as is, but staff should be directed to stop doing renewal investigations as a matter of course and to draft a procedure for determining when to ask the Council for permission to conduct an investigation. o If renewal investigations are not desired, then no action is necessary other than to direct staff to stop conducting the investigations unless otherwise directed by the Council. o If the City will undertake renewal investigations, will the investigation fee remain the same as it is currently? No distinction between the initial and renewal fees? 2 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES BALANCE SHEET MAY 31, 2009 LINO LAKES GAS UTILITY FUND ASSETS 606 -10100 LL GAS CASH 606 -11500 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - CUSTOMERS 606 -14200 INVENTORY 606 -15500 PREPAID INSURANCE 606 -15625 UNAMORTIZED DIS -REF BONDS 606 -15700 UTILITY RIGHTS (TARGET) 606 -15750 UTILITY RIGHTS (ELEMENTARY) 606 -15760 UTILITY RIGHTS (KOHLS) 606 -15765 UTILITY RIGHTS (PANATTONNI) 606 -15770 UTILITY RIGHTS (APOLLO /SCHWAN 606 -15775 UTILITY RIGHTS (LEGACY) 606 -15780 UTILITY RIGHTS (YMCA) 606 -15785 UTILITY RIGHTS (SEARS) 606 -16200 BUILDING 606 -16300 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 606 -16420 EQUIPMENT 606 -16610 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND EQUITY LIABILITIES 606 -20200 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 606 -21500 ACCRUED INTEREST PAYABLE 606 -21650 ANNUAL LEAVE PAYABLE 606 -21800 SALES TAX PAYABLE 606 -21900 FRANCHISE FEE PAYABLE 606 -22530 REVENUE BONDS PAYABLE - CURRENT 606 -23135 REFUNDING BONDS PAYABLE ( ( ws t/3/07 770,479.16) 207,073.93 7,142.08 8,103.80 3,600.00 19, 829.46 7,440.00 8,009.02 48,679.40 5,595.97 46, 042.29 23,625.00 2,395.85 1,937.44 1,155,261.33 592,164.88 825,855.06) 38,506.44 3,520.85 20,389.00 2,770.56 60, 501.21 50, 000.00 105,000.00 540, 566.23 TOTAL LIABILITIES 280,688.06 FUND EQUITY 606 -27200 RETAINED EARNINGS 180,374.30 UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD 79,503.87 BALANCE - CURRENT DATE TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 79, 503.87 259, 878.17 540, 566.23 606 -37- 7510 -000 606 -37- 7520 -000 606 -37- 7530 -000 606 -37- 7535 -000 606 -37- 7540 -000 606 -37- 7550 -000 606 -37- 7560 -000 606 -37- 7565 -000 606 -37- 7568 -000 606 -37- 7570 -000 606 -37- 7585 -000 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2009 LINO LAKES GAS UTILITY FUND SALES REVENUE RESIDENTIAL GAS SALES -HEAT RESIDENTIAL GAS SALES -NON HEAT COMMERCIAL GAS SALES GAS SALES - INT SM VOLUME INTERRUPTABLE GAS SALES LG VOL SERVICE PIPE SALES PENALTIES SERVICE LABOR CHARGES FURNACE SAFETY INSPECTIONS MISC GAS SALES FRANCHISE FEES TOTAL SALES REVENUE TOTAL FUND REVENUE PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT ( 28,531.66 435,082.30 855,110.00 420,027.70 50.9 52.42 649.12 400.00 ( 249.12) 162.3 17,192.22 337,711.78 577,352.00 239,640.22 58.5 1,889.88 21,786.69 43,250.00 21,463.31 50.4 19,434.90 197,370.12 460,440.00 263,069.88 42.9 66,178.34) 14, 344.00 160, 890.00 146, 546.00 8.9 671.14 8,331.05 9,500.00 1,168.95 87.7 290.05 2,079.29 1,750.00 ( 329.29) 118.8 329.80 712.60 3,000.00 2,287.40 23.8 100.10 2,615.54 4,000.00 1,384.46 65.4 70,876.32 70,876.32 .00 ( 70,876.32) .0 73,190.15 1,091,558.81 2,115,692.00 1,024,133.19 51.6 73,190.15 1,091,558.81 2,115,692.00 1,024,133.19 51.6 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 41 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 17/10/2009 10:17AM PAGE: 5 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2009 GAS SOURCE OF SUPPLY 606 -49- 9600 -000 LL GAS - SOURCE OF SUPPLY 606 -49- 9600 -050 FRANCHISE FEE 606 -49- 9610 -101 606 -49- 9610 -102 606 -49- 9610 -103 606 -49- 9610 -120 606 -49- 9610 -130 606 -49- 9610 -212 606 -49- 9610 -214 606 -49- 9610 -215 606 -49- 9610 -218 606 -49- 9610 -219 606 -49- 9610 -306 606 -49- 9610 -307 606 -49- 9610 -321 606 -49- 9610 -331 606 -49- 9610 -380 606 -49- 9610 -401 606 -49- 9610 -402 606 -49- 9610 -404 606 -49- 9610 -405 606 -49- 9610 -406 606 -49- 9610 -433 606 -49- 9610 -495 LINO LAKES GAS UTILITY FUND TOTAL GAS SOURCE OF SUPPLY GAS OPERATIONS LL GAS - SALARIES FT LL GAS - SALARIES OT LL GAS - SALARIES PT LL GAS - PAYROLL TAXES LL GAS - INSURANCE LL GAS -MOTOR FUEL LUBS LL GAS -TOOLS LL GAS - SUPPLIES SHOP LL GAS - UNIFORMS LL GAS - SUPPLIES MISC LL GAS - MEDICAL TESTING & PHYS LL GAS - CONSULTING LL GAS - TELEPHONE LL GAS - TRAVEL LL GAS - UTILITIES LL GAS - BUILDING MAINTENANCE LL GAS -GAS MAIN REPAIR LL GAS - REPAIR MTC EQUIPMENT LL GAS - CATHODIC PROTECTION REP LL GAS - REPAIR MTC METERS REGS LL GAS -DUES SUBSCRIPTIONS LL GAS - MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL GAS OPERATIONS PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT 38,165.54 755,234.86 3,629.56 60,501.21 41,795.10 815,736.07 1,465, 000.00 115, 354.00 1, 580, 354.00 709,765.14 51.6 54,852.79 52.5 764,617.93 51.6 7,490.65 37,470.89 95,427.00 57,956.11 39.3 83.73 626.60 2,564.00 1,937.40 24.4 .00 .00 2,520.00 2,520.00 .0 1,063.29 5,353.60 14,493.00 9,139.40 36.9 1,257.43 8,330.25 17,075.00 8,744.75 48.8 134.44 508.81 3,048.00 2,539.19 16.7 .00 79.48 426.00 346.52 18.7 234.41 503.55 2,550.00 2,046.45 19.8 13.49 341.69 567.00 225.31 60.3 .00 271.61 750.00 478.39 36.2 .00 126.00 525.00 399.00 24.0 .00 2,021.42 6,510.00 4,488.58 31.1 70.49 359.07 750.00 390.93 47.9 13.53 1,307.66 3,098.00 1,790.34 42.2 154.30 1,101.33 2,760.00 1,658.67 39.9 23.12 254.08 1,255.00 1,000.92 20.3 410.99 879.26 12, 000.00 11,120.74 7.3 355.84 635.04 4,255.00 3,619.96 14.9 .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00 .0 21.21 21.21 8,500.00 8,478.79 .3 45.50 45.50 .00 ( 45.50) .0 98.75 166.88 1,300.00 1,133.12 12.8 11,471.17 60,403.93 182,873.00 122,469.07 33.0 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 41 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 17/10/2009 10:17AM PAGE: 6 606 -49- 9612 -101 606 -49- 9612 -102 606 -49- 9612 -120 606 -49- 9612 -130 606 -49- 9612 -201 606 -49- 9612 -212 606 -49- 9612 -214 606 -49- 9612 -217 606 -49 -9612 -218 606 -49- 9612 -314 606 -49- 9612 -321 606 -49- 9612 -331 606 -49- 9612 -350 606 -49- 9612 -360 606 -49- 9612 -380 606 -49- 9612 -404 606 -49- 9612 -420 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2009 LINO LAKES GAS UTILITY FUND APPLIANCE SERVICE LL SERVICE - SALARIES FT LL SERVICE - SALARIES OT LL SERVICE - PAYROLL TAXES LL SERVICE - INSURANCE LL SERVICE - OFFICE SUPPLIES LL SERVICE -MOTOR FUEL & LUBS LL SERVICE -TOOLS LL SERVICE- SUPPLIES RESALE LL SERVICE - UNIFORMS LL SERVICE - CONTRACT SERVICE LL SERVICE - TELEPHONE LL SERVICE - TRAVEL LL SERVICE - PUBLISHING /PRINTING LL SERVICE - INSURANCE LL SERVICE - UTILITIES LL SERVICE - REP /MAINT EQUIPMENT LL SERVICE - DEPRECIATION TOTAL APPLIANCE SERVICE PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT 4,316.82 21,570.77 56,169.00 34,598.23 38.4 240.68 2,028.74 4,159.00 2,130.26 48.8 630.30 3,271.47 8,816.00 5,544.53 37.1 710.15 4,832.80 10,442.00 5,609.20 46.3 .00 .00 105.00 105.00 .0 92.61 331.47 1,628.00 1,296.53 20.4 .00 .00 175.00 175.00 - .0 154.50 1,311.62 3,500.00 2,188.38 37.5 9.00 247.33 378.00 130.67 65.4 .00 281.00 1,400.00 1,119.00 20.1 22.42 156.25 690.00 533.75 22.6 .00 .00 1,645.00 1,645.00 .0 .00 .00 700.00 700.00 .0 145.00 725.00 2,218.00 1,493.00 32.7 46.97 327.80 817.00 489.20 40.1 .00 243.50 500.00 256.50 48.7 120.00 600.00 2,883.00 2,283.00 20.8 6,488.45 35,927.75 96,225.00 60,297.25 37.3 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 41 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 17/10/2009 10:17AM PAGE: 7 606 -49- 9620 -101 606 -49- 9620 -102 606 -49- 9620 -103 606 -49- 9620 -120 606 -49- 9620 -130 606 -49- 9620 -201 606 -49- 9620 -218 606 -49- 9620 -219 606 -49- 9620 -301 606 -49- 9620 -303 606 -49- 9620 -304 606 -49- 9620 -307 606 -49- 9620 -321 606 -49- 9620 -322 606 -49- 9620 -331 606 -49- 9620 -350 606 -49- 9620 -360 606 -49- 9620 -380 606 -49- 9620 -402 606 -49- 9620 -404 606 -49- 9620 -405 606 -49- 9620 -420 606 -49- 9620 -432 606 -49- 9620 -433 606 -49- 9620 -435 606 -49- 9620 -440 606 -49- 9620 -495 606 -49- 9620 -611 606 -49- 9620 -620 606 -49- 9620 -650 606 -49- 9620 -900 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2009 LINO LAKES GAS UTILITY FUND GAS ADMINISTRATION LL GAS - SALARIES FT LL GAS - SALARIES OT LL GAS - SALARIES PT LL GAS - PAYROLL TAXES LL GAS - INSURANCE LL GAS - OFFICE SUPPLIES LL GAS - UNIFORMS LL GAS -MISC SUPPLIES LL GAS - AUDITING LL GAS - ENGINEERING LL GAS -LEGAL LL GAS - CONSULTING LL GAS - TELEPHONE LL GAS - POSTAGE LL GAS - TRAVEL LL GAS - PUBLISH PRINT LL GAS - INSURANCE LL GAS - UTILITIES LL GAS - BUILDING MAINT LL GAS -REP MCT EQUIPMENT LL GAS - MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS LL GAS - DEPRECIATION LL GAS - UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS LL GAS -DUES SUBSCRIPTIONS LL GAS -BOOK PAMPHLETS LL GAS -BANK CHARGES LL GAS - MISCELLANEOUS LL GAS - INTEREST ON BONDS LL GAS -BOND SERVICE FEE LL GAS -AMORT UTILITY RIGHTS LL GAS - CONTINGENCY TOTAL GAS ADMINISTRATION TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT 5,615.67 28,057.04 68,959.00 40,901.96 40.7 .00 .00 250.00 250.00 .0 34.80 488.87 2,400.00 1,911.13 20.4 753.34 3,787.32 10,468.00 6,680.68 36.2 580.18 3,428.70 12,093.00 8,664.30 28.4 33.56 578.93 3,800.00 3,221.07 15.2 .00 .00 300.00 300.00 .0 36.00 52.80 100.00 47.20 52.8 148.80 1,282.55 1,500.00 217.45 85.5 .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 .00 461.00 2,804.00 2,343.00 16.4 323.00 1,366.00 4,450.00 3,084.00 30.7 10.38 285.10 1,091.00 805.90 26.1 414.18 2,045.63 4,500.00 2,454.37 45.5 69.37 228.75 3,878.00 3,649.25 5.9 .00 45.41 705.00 659.59 6.4 1,093.00 5,465.00 13,822.00 8,357.00 39.5 44.06 255.98 648.00 392.02 39.5 177.70 177.70 600.00 422.30 29.6 250.95 288.96 300.00 11.04 96.3 .00 1,832.84 3,725.00 1,892.16 49.2 5,500.00 27,500.00 66,382.00 38,882.00 41.4 .00 • 1,009.63 3,500.00 2,490.37 28.9 .00 1,444.01 1,769.00 324.99 81.6 11.90 51.03 110.00 58.97 46.4 382.55 947.50 1,800.00 852.50 52.6 .00 232.24 1,000.00 767.76 23.2 704.17 3,520.85 8,450.00 4,929.15 41.7 .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 3,030.67 15,153.35 38,043.00 22,889.65 39.8 .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 19,214.28 99,987.19 263,447.00 163,459.81 38.0 78,969.00 1,012,054.94 2,122,899.00 1,110,844.06 47.7 ( 5,778.85) 79,503.87 7,207.00) 86,710.87) 1103.2' FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 41 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 17/10/2009 10:17AM PAGE: 8 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES BALANCE SHEET MAY 31, 2009 CIRCLE PINES GAS UTILITY FUND ASSETS 605 -10100 CP GAS CASH 1,167,290.47 605 -10200 PETTY CASH 100.00 605 -10450 INTEREST RECEIVABLE 2,481.28 605 -11500 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE CUSTOMER 130,406.16 605 -14200 INVENTORY 15,176.91 605 -14300 NN GAS STORAGE INVENTORY ( 427.01) 605 -15500 PREPAID INSURANCE 15,347.20 605 -16200 BUILDING 25,238.17 605 -16300 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 1,210,543.10 605 -16420 EQUIPMENT 650,669.43 605 -16610 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION ( 1,292,615.04) TOTAL ASSETS 1,924,210.67 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY LIABILITIES 605 -20200 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 605 -21650 ANNUAL LEAVE PAYALE 605 -21800 SALES TAX PAYABLE 605 -21900 CIRCLE PINES FRANCHISE PAYABLE 27,977.37 23,793.00 3,688.17 4,651.00 TOTAL LIABILITIES 60,109.54 FUND EQUITY 605 -26100 CONTRIBUTED EQUITY 605 -27200 RETAINED EARNINGS UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES - YTD 56,965.17 BALANCE - CURRENT DATE TOTAL FUND EQUITY TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 95,752.49 1,711,383.47 56, 965.17 1,864,101.13 1,924,210.67 605 -37- 7510 -000 605 -37- 7520 -000 605 -37- 7530 -000 605 -37- 7540 -000 605 -37- 7550 -000 605 -37- 7560 -000 605 -37- 7565 -000 605 -37- 7568 -000 605 -37- 7570 -000 605 -37- 7575 -000 605 -37- 7585 -000 605 -37- 7595 -000 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2009 CIRCLE PINES GAS UTILITY FUND SALES REVENUE RESIDENTIAL GAS SALES -HEAT RESIDENTIAL GAS SALES -NON HEAT COMMERCIAL GAS SALES INTERRUPTABLE GAS SALES SERVICE PIPE SALES PENALTIES SERVICE LABOR CHARGES FURNACE SAFETY INSPECTIONS MISC GAS SALES INTEREST FRANCHISE FEES NORTHERN NATURAL REFUND TOTAL SALES REVENUE TOTAL FUND REVENUE PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT 50,383.81 893,849.00 1,810,392.00 916,543.00 49.4 2,307.16 3,147.28 1,000.00 ( 2,147.28) 314.7 4,628.99 123,979.68 246,635.00 122,655.32 50.3 50.00 7,949.72 9,370.00 1,420.28 84.8 4.17 2,924.13 500.00 ( 2,424.13) 584.8 811.30 11,206.95 14,000.00 2,793.05 80.1 406.00 4,791.94 4,500.00 ( 291.94) 106.5 669.60 939.45 6,000.00 5,060.55 15.7 79.25 3,241.18 4,500.00 1,258.82 72.0 2,852.41 10,201.52 25,000.00 14,798.48 40.8 1,730.50 1,730.50 .00 ( 1,730.50) .0 .00 .00 100.00 100.00 .0 63, 923.19 1, 063, 961.35 2,121, 997.00 1, 058, 035.65 50.1 63, 923.19 1, 063, 961.35 2,121, 997.00 1,058,035.65 50.1 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 41 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 16/10/2009 10:16AM PAGE: 1 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2009 CIRCLE PINES GAS UTILITY FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT GAS SOURCE OF SUPPLY 605 -49- 9600 -000 CP GAS - SOURCE OF SUPPLY 27,115.22 750,191.21 1,391,450.00 641,258.79 53.9 605 -49- 9600 -050 FRANCHISE FEE 4,651.00 4,651.00 .00 ( 4,651.00) .0 605 -49- 9610 -101 605 -49 -9610 -102 605 -49- 9610 -103 605 -49- 9610 -120 605 -49- 9610 -130 605 -49- 9610 -212 605 -49- 9610 -214 605 -49- 9610 -215 605 -49- 9610 -218 605 -49- 9610 -219 605 -49- 9610 -306 605 -49- 9610 -307 605 -49- 9610 -321 605 -49- 9610 -331 605 -49- 9610 -380 605 -49- 9610 -401 605 -49- 9610 -402 605 -49- 9610 -404 605 -49 -9610 -405 605 -49- 9610 -406 605 -49- 9610 -433 605 -49- 9610 -495 TOTAL GAS SOURCE OF SUPPLY GAS OPERATIONS CP GAS - SALARIES FT CP GAS - SALARIES OT CP GAS - SALARIES PT CP GAS - PAYROLL TAXES CP GAS - INSURANCE CP GAS -MOTOR FUEL LUBS CP GAS -TOOLS CP GAS - SUPPLIES SHOP CP GAS - UNIFORMS CP GAS - SUPPLIES MISC CP GAS - MEDICAL TESTING & PHYS CP GAS - CONSULTING CP GAS - TELEPHONE CP GAS - TRAVEL CP GAS - UTILITIES CP GAS - BUILDING MAINTENANCE CP GAS -GAS MAIN REPAIR CP GAS - REPAIR MTC EQUIPMENT CP GAS - CATHODIC PROTECTION REP CP GAS - REPAIR MTC METERS -REGS CP GAS -DUES SUBSCRIPTIONS CP GAS - MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL GAS OPERATIONS 31,766.22 754,842.21 1,391,450.00 636,607.79 54.3 7,726.69 38,654.21 100,752.00 62,097.79 38.4 210.87 1,453.66 6,095.00 4,641.34 23.9 .00 .00 2,520.00 2,520.00 .0 1,122.18 5,802.17 15, 806.00 10, 003.83 36.7 1,467.33 8,088.46 19,975.00 11,886.54 40.5 255.82 1,094.18 5,713.00 4,618.82 19.2 .00 148.90 937.00 788.10 15.9 506.76 1,097.29 5,550.00 4,452.71 19.8 31.48 894.91 1,323.00 428.09 67.6 .00 313.43 1,200.00 886.57 26.1 .00 234.00 975.00 741.00 24.0 .00 6,435.64 14,970.00 8,534.36 43.0 116.88 589.90 1,350.00 760.10 43.7 25.13 1,063.52 5,753.00 4,689.48 18.5 372.89 2,696.67 6,810.00 4,113.33 39.6 50.86 558.28 2,365.00 1,806.72 23.6 1,771.30 4,574.62 6,000.00 1,425.38 76.2 724.59 1,278.95 7,365.00 6,086.05 17.4 .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00 .0 39.40 135.40 23, 300.00 23,164.60 .6 84.50 84.50 .00 ( 84.50) .0 65.97 111.74 2,100.00 1,988.26 5.3 14,572.65 75,310.43 233,359.00 158,048.57 32.3 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 41 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 17/10/2009 10:17AM PAGE: 2 605 -49- 9612 -101 605 -49- 9612 -102 605 -49- 9612 -120 605 -49- 9612 -130 605 -49- 9612 -201 605 -49- 9612 -212 605 -49- 9612 -214 605 -49- 9612 -217 605 -49- 9612 -218 605 -49- 9612 -314 605 -49- 9612 -321 605 -49- 9612 -331 605 -49- 9612 -350 605 -49- 9612 -360 605 -49- 9612 -380 605 -49- 9612 -404 605 -49- 9612 -420 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2009 CIRCLE PINES GAS UTILITY FUND APPLIANCE SERVICE CP SERVICE - SALARIES FT CP SERVICE - SALARIES OT CP SERVICE - PAYROLL TAXES CP SERVICE - INSURANCE CP SERVICE - OFFICE SUPPLIES CP SERVICE -MOTOR FUEL & LUBS CP SERVICE -TOOLS CP SERVICE - SUPPLIES RESALE CP SERVICE - UNIFORMS CP SERVICE - CONTRACT SERVICES CP SERVICE - TELEPHONE CP SERVICE - TRAVEL CONF /SCHOOLS CP SERVICE - PUBLISHING /PRINTING CP SERVICE - INSURANCE CP SERVICE - UTILITIES CP SERVICE - REP /MTC EQUIPMENT CP SERVICE - DEPRECIATION TOTAL APPLIANCE SERVICE PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT 6,187.79 30,920.05 79,800.00 48,879.95 38.8 221.10 2,554.07 7,191.00 4,636.93 35.5 879.49 4,606.63 12,792.00 8,185.37 36.0 911.04 6,338.80 14,843.00 8,504.20 42.7 .00 .00 175.00 175.00 .0 169.94 582.11 3,023.00 2,440.89 19.3 .00 .00 325.00 325.00 .0 286.92 2,658.19 6,500.00 3,841.81 40.9 17.99 494.64 756.00 261.36 65.4 .00 314.00 2,600.00 2,286.00 12.1 41.64 296.71 1,305.00 1,008.29 22.7 .00 .00 3,055.00 3,055.00 .0 .00 .00 1,300.00 1,300.00 .0 280.00 1,400.00 4,436.00 3,036.00 31.6 46.97 347.30 817.00 469.70 42.5 .00 453.28 750.00 296.72 60.4 225.00 1,125.00 2,800.00 1,675.00 40.2 9,267.88 52,090.78 142,468.00 90,377.22 36.6 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 41 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 17/10/2009 10:17AM PAGE: 3 605 -49- 9620 -101 605 -49- 9620 -102 605 -49- 9620 -103 605 -49- 9620 -120 605 -49- 9620 -130 605 -49- 9620 -201 605 -49- 9620 -218 605 -49- 9620 -219 605 -49- 9620 -301 605 -49- 9620 -303 605 -49- 9620 -304 605 -49- 9620 -307 605 -49- 9620 -321 605 -49- 9620 -322 605 -49- 9620 -331 605 -49- 9620 -350 605 -49- 9620 -360 605 -49 -9620 -380 605 -49- 9620 -402 605 -49- 9620 -404 605 -49- 9620 -405 605 -49- 9620 -420 605 -49- 9620 -431 605 -49- 9620 -432 605 -49- 9620 -433 605 -49- 9620 -435 605 -49- 9620 -440 605 -49- 9620 -495 605 -49- 9620 -900 CITY OF CIRCLE PINES EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31, 2009 CIRCLE PINES GAS UTILITY FUND GAS ADMINISTRATION CP GAS - SALARIES FT CP GAS - SALARIES CP GAS - SALARIES PT CP GAS - PAYROLL TAXES CP GAS - INSURANCE CP GAS - OFFICE SUPPLIES CP GAS - UNIFORMS CP GAS -MISC SUPPLIES CP GAS - AUDITING CP GAS - ENGINEERING CP GAS -LEGAL CP GAS - CONSULTING CP GAS - TELEPHONE CP GAS - POSTAGE CP GAS - TRAVEL CP GAS - PUBLISH PRINT CP GAS - INSURANCE CP GAS - UTILITIES CP GAS - BUILDING MAINT CP GAS - REPAIR MTC EQUIPMENT CP GAS - MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS CP GAS - DEPRECIATION CP GAS -CASH SHORT (OVER) CP GAS - UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS CP GAS -DUES SUBSCRIPTION CP GAS -BOOK PAMPHLETS CP GAS -BANK CHARGES CP GAS - MISCELLANEOUS CP GAS - CONTINGENCY TOTAL GAS ADMINISTRATION TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT 7,089.60 35,420.84 86,962.00 51,541.16 40.7 52.16 156.47 500.00 343.53 31.3 69.60 2,023.95 7,380.00 5,356.05 27.4 966.15 4,939.91 13,674.00 8,734.09 36.1 790.67 6,678.79 17,453.00 10,774.21 38.3 55.92 966.02 6,000.00 5,033.98 16.1 .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 79.18 116.12 550.00 433.88 21.1 198.40 2,465.90 3,000.00 534.10 82.2 .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 .00 599.00 3,796.00 3,197.00 15.8 710.60 2,957.20 8,110.00 5,152.80 36.5 20.75 621.36 2,315,00 1,693.64 26.8 910.07 4,496.41 9,900.00 5,403.59 45.4 161.87 529.19 8,461.00 7,931.81 6.3 .00 85.95 1,345.00 1,259.05 6.4 2,001.00 10,005.00 26,839.00 16,834.00 37.3 110.15 640.00 1,620.00 980.00 39.5 390.94 390.94 1,320.00 929.06 29.6 552.08 635.67 660.00 24.33 96.3 .00 4,000.33 7,645.00 3,644.67 52.3 5,300.00 26,500.00 64,201.00 37,701.00 41.3 .00 ( 20.00) .00 20.00 .0 234.26 3,395.22 5,000.00 1,604.78 67.9 .00 2,897.09 3,531.00 633.91 82.1 22.10 94.77 230.00 135.23 41.2 357.86 1,579.18 3,000.00 1,420.82 52.6 10,614.52 12,577.45 3,000.00 ( 9,577.45) 419.3 .00 .00 20,000.00 20,000.00 .0 30,687.88 124,752.76 308,492.00 183,739.24 40.4 86,294.63 1,006,996.18 2,075,769.00 1,068,772.82 48.5 22,371.44) 56,965.17 46,228.00 ( 10,737.17) 123.2 FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 41 % OF THE FISCAL YEAR HAS ELAPSED 17/10/2009 10:17AM PAGE: 4 White Bear Twp. Shoreview North Oaks Lino Lakes cm 0 Forest Lake Circle Pines Blaine Andover 0 "public and quasi - public" (which includes churches) allowed as permitted uses in: • Limited Retail Service District (CIA) • Retail Service District (C1) • General Commercial District (C2) • Office District (OFC) • Business Park District (BPK) 0 currently not allowed Ordinance No. 04 -09 will amend to allow "Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings" in: • LB Limited Business • GB General Business "places of worship" allowed as permitted uses in: • Residential service district (RS) • Central business district (C -1) "places of worship" allowed as conditional uses in: • Highway Business (B -3) - 0 0 churches allowed as conditional uses in: • Community Commercial (B2) • Regional Commercial (B3) • Office Park (B4) churches allowed as conditional uses in: • LB Limited Business • SC Shopping Center commercial zoning districts 0 aCD CI, "public and quasi - public" (which includes churches) allowed as permitted uses in: • Industrial District (I) 0 a., 0 a a. "places of worship" allowed as conditional uses in: • Restricted industrial district (I -1) • General industrial district (I -3) • Restricted commercial district, outside of urban service area (RC -1) 0 2 CD a, 0 CD a, 0 2- CD a 0 o CD a+ industrial zoning districts 0 600Z `£ tsanV DATA YOY % YOY % Population Change Tax Levy Change 1998 15053 $ 2,889,626 1999 . 15760 4.49% $ 3,699,918 21.90% 2000 16791 6.14% $ 4,187,526 11.64% 2001 17380 3.39% $ 4,766,240 12.14% 2002 17942 3.13% $ 5,902,158 19.25% 2003 18368 2.32% $ 6,124,621 3.63% 2004 18725 1.91% $ 6,550,620 6.50% 2005 19698 4.94% $ 7,269,302 9.89% 2006 19736 0.19% $ 7,976,907 8.87% Percentage of Change 25.00% - 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Year over Year % of Change 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 • Population • Tax Levy