Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/10/2001 P&Z Packet• • AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD Wednesday, October 10, 2001 6:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 11, 2001 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Molin Concrete, 415 Lilac Street, Amend Conditional Use Permit, Amend Interim Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Jeff Smyser B. Cornerstone Homes, 6483 Clearwater Creek Drive, Variance, Tanda Gretz C. John Dahl, 6192 Hodgson Road, Minor Subdivision, Jeff Smyser D. McDonalds Corporation/JADT, Southeast Corner of Lake Drive and Apollo Drive, Revised Site Plan Approval, Mike Grochala DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Marketplace Update, Mike Grochala VI. ADJOURN • • • AGENDA ITEM V. A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: October 10, 2001 TOPIC: BACKGROUND PUBLIC HEARING (continued) - Amendments To Conditional Use Permit - Amendments to Interim Use Permit -Site and Building Plan Review Molin Concrete, 415 Lilac St. Molin Concrete Products Company has submitted applications for amendments to the existing conditional use permit (CUP), amendments to the existing interim use permit, and for a site plan review. The requested amendments would change several of the conditions that were adopted with previous approvals. The site plan review application is for a new manufacturing building on the site. The new building also is an amendment to the conditional use permit. The P & Z opened the public hearing at the September 11 meeting and continued the hearing to allow for a neighborhood meeting. A meeting with the neighbors occurred September 26. Approximately 15 residents attended, along with representatives of Molin, Cheesebrough Trucking, the City Planner, and P & Z Chair Schaps. Mr. Schaps facilitated the meeting. The discussion led to several revisions to proposed conditions of approval, which are incorporated into this report. This report is based on the following submittals received August 13, 2001 or as noted: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Plowe Engineering Utility Plan Plowe Engineering Wetland Mitigation Plan Plowe Engineering Set of Architectural, Structural, Mechanical Professional Design Group includes Site Plan, Floor Plan, Building Elevations, mechanical, electrical, etc. Letter from Randy Molin dated August 7, received August 8 Planting Plan, revised, received by City October 2, 2001 ANALYSIS The Molin site includes approximately 55 acres. The entire site is guided for industrial use by both the old and the new comprehensive plans. The north 20 acres of the site is • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 2 zoned LI, the southern 35 acres is zoned GI. Surrounding land use and zoning is shown in the table: Site and Building Plan Review Structure: The proposed new structure is a building for extruded precast manufacturing. The building is approximately 600 feet long and 66' wide. It will have precast concrete walls 36' high for the majority of the building. There will be a smooth band with windows four feet wide at the 25' height. Near the south end the building itself will increase to 45' high, then decrease to 11'. At the south end there will be two cement silos rising to approximately 70 ft. in height. Near the silos are below -grade material bins for aggregate and sand. The building will cover approximately 38,000 sf. The silos and material bins will use additional area. Height: As stated above, the proposed new production facility includes two cement silos rising to approximately 70' in height. The height maximum in the GI zone is 45'. Under Section 3 Subd. 4.C.3. of the zoning ordinance, building heights in excess of the standards of the districts may be allowed through a conditional use permit, provided that: a. Demonstrated need is established for the increase in height and said increase will not violate the intent and character of the zoning district in which the structure is located. comment: The production facility requires the cement silos. The GI zoning district is the City's most intense industrial zone. The GI zone, as stated in the purpose paragraph of the ordinance, is for "areas which, because of availability to thoroughfares, suitable topography, and isolation, are appropriate for industrial uses of a more intense nature and ones which may have certain nuisance characteristics." Existing Land Use Comp. Plan Land Use Map Zoning site industrial Industrial GI and LI north residential Low Density Unsewer. Resid. Rural east residential, cemetery Low Density Unsewer. Resid. Industrial Commercial Rural GI (cemetery) south industrial Industrial GI west residential Lino Air Park Low Density Unsewer. Resid. Rural R -1 Site and Building Plan Review Structure: The proposed new structure is a building for extruded precast manufacturing. The building is approximately 600 feet long and 66' wide. It will have precast concrete walls 36' high for the majority of the building. There will be a smooth band with windows four feet wide at the 25' height. Near the south end the building itself will increase to 45' high, then decrease to 11'. At the south end there will be two cement silos rising to approximately 70 ft. in height. Near the silos are below -grade material bins for aggregate and sand. The building will cover approximately 38,000 sf. The silos and material bins will use additional area. Height: As stated above, the proposed new production facility includes two cement silos rising to approximately 70' in height. The height maximum in the GI zone is 45'. Under Section 3 Subd. 4.C.3. of the zoning ordinance, building heights in excess of the standards of the districts may be allowed through a conditional use permit, provided that: a. Demonstrated need is established for the increase in height and said increase will not violate the intent and character of the zoning district in which the structure is located. comment: The production facility requires the cement silos. The GI zoning district is the City's most intense industrial zone. The GI zone, as stated in the purpose paragraph of the ordinance, is for "areas which, because of availability to thoroughfares, suitable topography, and isolation, are appropriate for industrial uses of a more intense nature and ones which may have certain nuisance characteristics." • • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 3 b. The site is capable of accommodating the increased structure size. comment: A 55 -acre site is large enough for such a structure. Soils in this area of the City typically can support buildings. Soil analyses are a normal requirement for building permits. c. The potential increased intensity and size of use does not cause an increase in traffic volumes beyond the capacity of the surrounding streets. comment: The silos will not increase traffic. d. Public utilities and services are adequate. comment: The silos will not increase the need for public services. e. For each additional story over the district limitation or for each additional ten (10) feet above the maximum allowed per district, front and side yard setback requirements shall be increased by ten (10) percent. comment: The 70' silos are 25' higher than the 45' limit. Therefore, the front and side setbacks must increase 25 %. The minimum front setback is 50', the minimum side setback is 10'. The increased front setback must be 62.5', the side must be 12.5'. The minimum setback from a residential property increases from 100' to 125'. The silos are more than 300' from the road in front, and about 200' from the nearest side lot line. Therefore, they comply with the increased setbacks. f. The construction does not limit solar access to abutting and/or neighboring properties. g. comment: Molin prepared an analysis to determine the length of the shadow of the silos to determine if there will be a solar access issue. The analysis shows that the silos will not limit solar access for neighboring homes. The Molin property continues for 200' east of the proposed silos. Property to the east of Molin is owned by the Twitchell Cemetery. That site is zoned and guided for industrial use. Some shadow will be cast during the hour just prior to sunset in mid- winter. Solar access is not limited on neighboring properties. The existing building is taller and larger than the proposed silos. The provisions of Section 2, Subd. 2. of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. comment: This is the section of required standards for CUP. There are nine findings, and they are addressed below in the section of this report on CUPs. • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 4 However, one provision is of particular interest to the 70' height issue. The first provision requires that the use "will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City." The Lino Air Park is just west of the northern portion of the Molin site. A private air park is not governed by the typical regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration or MnDOT in the same way a public airport is governed. However, safety issues should be considered by the City. The 70' silos are not in the direct line of the Lino Air Park runway. Representatives of the Air Park and City staff met to analyze the site. Neither the silos nor the overhead cranes pose an aviation hazard. Overhead Cranes: The proposal includes overhead cranes (gantry system) that will stand approximately 33 feet high. The cranes will serve a new storage area covering 150 by 500 feet in the central portion of the Molin site. The cranes will run on rails over the entire new storage area. Finished product will be stored more compactly using the cranes. The cranes will be able to load product directly onto trucks. Lighting: When an earlier building was constructed, the exterior lighting caused • some concerns among nearby residents. It is unlikely that the exterior lighting will exceed the City's ordinance restrictions. However, it has been the City's practice to require photometric plans for new commercial/industrial buildings. In addition, we have required pictures of the fixtures themselves to ensure lighting is directed down rather than horizontally or upward. The City allows a maximum of 0.4 foot candles at the residential property lines and 1.0 foot candles at the centerline of a street. Photometric plans were submitted September 26 along with a cut sheet of the exterior lighting fixtures. The proposed building lighting complies with the requirements. The proposed fixture meets City policy requiring a fully shielded design such as a shoebox fixture. A condition of approval listed in this report is that the fixtures submitted for review are the ones used on the building. Lighting on the new crane must also comply with these requirements. Information on crane lighting must be submitted and reviewed before City Council consideration of the applications. Landscaping Plan: No landscaping around the new building is planned. The section of this report on the conditional use permit discusses landscaping for the larger site. Green space: A maximum of 90% of the site can be impervious surface in the General Industrial and Light Industrial zones. The proposal will not exceed this. • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 5 Traffic, Circulation: The proposed new building will not interfere with or impact traffic on surrounding roads. Internal circulation is governed by the manufacturing process and storage needs. A condition of the 1997 CUP approval is that the City is to prohibit on- street truck parking on Lilac Street. However, Lilac St. is a county road, and the City does not have legal authority to impose a parking ban on a county road. Therefore, compliance will be voluntary. Parking: There is no parking requirement listed in the ordinance for heavy manufacturing. An analysis in 1997 of previous action on the site included a parking needs calculation using as a basis the parking requirement for a light manufacturing facility. The standard for a light manufacturing facility is one parking space for each employee or one space for each 2000 square feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater. For the sake of consistency, it is useful to compare the new application with that 1997 analysis. The total square footage was 110,200 sf for existing and, at the time, future anticipated buildings. The analysis resulted in a requirement of 55 off - street parking spaces. A "future" manufacturing building of 35,000 sf on the old plan is the comparable to this new building, which is about 38,000 sf. The office building that was built is .6511 sf rather than the 4800 sf anticipated in 1997. There are 76 existing parking spaces now. If off - street parking causes a problem in the future, the City can re- examine the site to determine means of eliminating any safety concerns. Stormwater Management: The grading and drainage plan was reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District and received preliminary approval. The proposed plan includes enlarging and existing pond in the northwest corner of the site, creating a new pond in the interior of the site, and an infiltration area between the two. The drainage plan is subject to the review of the City Engineer. The western end of the berm will be removed as part of the construction of the these stormwater facilities. The berm then will be replaced. Wetlands: The proposed project will require filling of an existing wetland in the southeast corner of the site. Molin has received preliminary approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District for the wetland impacts. Additional wetland will be created in the northwest corner of the site by enlarging the pond there. These changes to the wetland and the new ponds will not have detrimental effects on wells in the area. Sign: Molin has not proposed new signage. • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 6 1997 Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Interim Use Permit Molin has an existing conditional use permit for the concrete plant that covers the entire site. They also have an interim use permit for outdoor storage that covers the northern 20 acres. In 1997 the City approved an amendment to the CUP as well as the interim use permit. The CUP amendment did include an expansion of the production building and included the batch plant that is 80' high. The conditions attached to the 1997 approvals did not specifically distinguish between the two permits —the conditional use permit and the interim use permit. The interim use permit only covers the northern 20 acres which is zoned LI. The conditional use permit covers the entire property. One can infer that conditions related to storage were intended to apply to the northern area. However, there have been differing interpretations voiced regarding which conditions apply where. It will be useful to clarify this, and the recommendations in this report do so. The conditions approved in 1997 follow, accompanied by brief comments on each. Molin is now requesting that conditions 11 a, 13c, and 13e be eliminated. 1. The City approve the requested zoning ordinance text amendment establishing open and outdoor storage as an interim use in the LI Zoning District comment: Ordinance 31 -97, adopted 10 /27/97, fulfilled this condition. 2. The City approve the requested vacation of 77th Street comment: Resolution 97 -156, approved 10- 27 -97, fulfilled this condition. 3. The City Council specifically approves an outdoor storage area surfacing material other than blacktop or concrete. comment: The site plan for the CUP /interim use permit does indicate bituminous in limited areas, gravel over large areas, and no paving on much of the site. This is the plan that was approved, so these surfacing materials are approved. 4. Outdoor lighting is prohibited in the site's outdoor storage area (north of 77th Street). Permissible exterior lighting shall be hooded and directed to reflect light away from neighboring residential properties and rights -of -way. comment: There is no outdoor lighting in the yards on the northern portion of the site. The "permissible exterior lighting" refers to the southern portion. Light • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 7 fixtures exist on the buildings. Molin added extra hoods to the lights on the buildings to provide shielding. 5. Consideration is given to aligning the site's western access point (from 4th Avenue) with 77th Street. This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. comment: The driveway onto 4th Ave. has been aligned with Thomas Ave. (77th St.). Molin has or will soon pave the driveway. 6. A minimum 150 -foot setback is maintained along the subject site's northern boundary. The buffer yard shall extend 40 feet north into this 150 -foot setback line. comment: A high berm begins approximately 100 feet from the northern property line. The berm is at least 40 feet wide at its base. This fulfills this condition. 7. The City shall prohibit on- street truck parking along Lilac Street. comment: The site was designed to provide stacking space on the site rather than on the street. There have been some trucks parked on Lilac St. but no complaints. Only when a truck is parked in the traffic lane is it a problem. The Molins stated that their dispatcher is located on Lilac across from the Molin plant. Drivers occasionally park on Lilac and walk into the dispatch office for instructions. 8. All additional site signage shall comply with applicable City sign requirements. comment: Sign permit reviews are designed to assure this. The Building Official has no outstanding signage issues. 9. All applicable MPCA requirements are satisfactorily met. comment: MPCA has rules regarding underground fuel tanks and stormwater management for water quality. Molin states that there are regular inspections of the tanks by an outside firm, which submits reports to MPCA. A new stormwater plan for the site is pending. The noise issue is the greatest concern. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) does have noise standards. This issue is discussed in greater detail below. 10. All proposed structures comply with applicable City building material requirements. comment: Building permit review has assured this. The Building Official has no outstanding building material issues. • • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 8 11. The following noise mitigation efforts are utilized: a. Concrete product (precast wall panels) are stored parallel to the northerly buffer yard to act as a sound buffer. comment: Molin is requesting that this condition be deleted (see Molin letter). Not all products stored in the northern area are wall panels. Molin typically stores wall panels both laying flat and stacked. The berm is a better insulator than the wall panels. Storing panels parallel to the berm will increase the amount of time the equipment would need to move them. This could increase the noise level for the neighbors. Storage of product is not a reliable means of mitigating noise. Staff recommends deleting this condition. b. The outdoor storage yard is arranged such that truck backing maneuvers toward residential properties are minimized. comment: It may be difficult to ensure this can occur, depending on product mix and volume. However, Molin has stated that they attempt to do this and they have not requested the removal of this condition. c. Molin equipment and trucks shall be outfitted with strobe lights to replace backup beepers during nighttime hours (6:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.). comment: The use of beepers versus strobe lights has been the topic of much discussion. Molin recently received a letter from Minnesota OSHA stating that training and strobe lights proposed to them by Molin is acceptable under the law. Staff is recommending that this condition remain in effect, and that it apply to the entire site, not only the northern storage area. 12. Comments by other City Staff. comment: A report on traffic implications from SEH suggests a condition of approval to prevent truck parking on Lilac St., which was included as condition 7. 13. The landscape plan shall be amended to show the following: a. Berm location • • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 9 comment: The berm exists and is shown on the old and new landscaping plans. The new grading plan shows it as well. b. Berm height of not less than 7 feet. comment: The existing berm meets this height condition. C. A solid row of coniferous trees on the north side of the buffer yard with a row of deciduous trees on the south side of the buffer yard. comment: Molin is requesting that this condition be deleted (see letter). The trees originally were part of a design for a lower (5') berm closer to the northern property line. The two rows of trees would provide additional screening. The berm is 7' to 8' high and setback 100+ feet, creating the setback and buffer area referred to in condition 6. Molin believes that the taller berm and the large setback area provide an adequate buffer and screen for the neighbors. Molin estimates the cost of the two solid rows of trees at $22,000. The berm is at the end of the runway for the Lino Air Park. Staff discussed the trees with representatives of the Lino Air Park. Staff and those representatives agreed that coniferous and deciduous trees planted along the berm would create a safety issue. For this reason, staff recommends eliminating the requirement for the two rows of trees along the berm. d. Landscaping along 4th Avenue comment: The plans include landscaping alon 4th Ave. The new landscaping plan includes some changes in species along 4 Ave. The new plantings are more drought tolerant. Quantities are similar. e. Irrigation for buffer area. comment: Molin is requesting that this condition be deleted (see letter). The "buffer area" is the berm. The revised landscaping plan submitted with the current application includes species that are more drought tolerant than the previous plan. Molin's landscaping consultant recommended these plants. Quantities are similar to the original plan. The irrigation system would be expensive: Molin estimates $18,000. Staff recommends eliminating the requirement for an irrigation system on the berm. • • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 10 14. The Interim Use Permit will expire if there is a change in the land use in the LI District. comment: This is not an issue to date. The approved storage activities continue. Noise Excerpts from MPCA rules are listed below with comments following them. MN Rules 7030.0020 DEFINITIONS Subp. 7. L10. "L10" means the sound level, expressed in dB(A), which is exceeded ten percent of the time for a one hour survey, as measured by test procedures approved by the commissioner. Subp. 8. L50. "L50" means the sound level, expressed in dB(A), which is exceeded 50 percent of the time for a one hour survey, as measured by test procedures approved by the commissioner. MN Rules 7030.0040 NOISE STANDARDS. Subpart 1. Scope. These standards describe the limiting levels of sound established on the basis of present knowledge for the preservation of public health and welfare. These standards are consistent with speech, sleep, annoyance, and hearing conservation requirements for receivers within areas grouped according to land activities by the noise area classification (NAC) system established in part 7030.0050. However, these standards do not, by themselves, identify the limiting levels of impulsive noise needed for the preservation of public health and welfare. Noise standards in subpart 2 apply to all sources. Subp. 2. Noise standards. Noise Area Classification Daytime Nighttime Lso L10 L50 L10 1 60 65 50 55 2 65 70 65 70 3 75 80 75 80 Residential land use is in Noise Area Classification 1. The measurements are to be taken at the location of the receiving use: in this case, the residential property. That is, noise generated by one use should not exceed the limits when measured from the other use. As can be seen from these definitions, a test must be able to determine if the specified decibel level is exceeded for 10% of the time for one hour, or for 50% of the time for one hour. Daytime in defined as 7:00 am to 10:00 pm, night time as 10:00 pm to 7:00 am. • • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 11 Molin had a noise measurement analysis performed in October 2000 by Wenck Associates. On October 24, the firm took readings from 4:30 am to 5:30 am and from 5:30 am to 6:30 am. On October 25, the firm took readings from 4:30 am to 5:30 am. The readings indicated no violation of MPCA noise rules during those times. MPCA did state in a conversation with City staff that if a test is conducted by established methods, MPCA typically accepts the results of the test. Neighbors are not satisfied by the Wenck analysis. Staff contacted the MPCA to see if MPCA could conduct the analysis. This is possible, but there is a waiting period of several months. Instead, the City hired a noise analysis consultant to perform another analysis. The new analysis is underway and staff hopes to have the results for the October 10 P & Z meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS As noted in the attached memo from the Environmental Specialist, on August 29 the Environmental Board tabled the project pending; submission of landscape plan, tree inventory, Rice Creek Watershed's TWAFFA requirement information, lighting plan, an understanding of chemical use on the site, use of well heads on site as indicated by the County Well Point Index. The landscape plan should show the use of native groundcover plants and trees, the berm area on the north should be looked at for effectiveness and the use of irrigation, and the City should re -focus on the priorities set forth in the current Surface Water management Plan review process so that the surface water issues are better understood in plan review sites such as Molin Concrete. It is not clear why the Environmental Board did not receive the submitted landscape plan. The landscaping plan was approved in 1997. The new plan is a revision of the previously approved plan, and the drought - resistant species have already been planted. No tree loss will occur from the proposed new building. The Rice Creek Watershed has granted its preliminary approval. A complete lighting plan will be a condition of approval before City Council review. Chemical use on the site is not changing, nor are any new wells being proposed. The City's surface water plan must be consistent with the Watershed plan. Both the Watershed and the City include surface water plan requirements in the review all projects. • • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 12 FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT As stated in Section 2 Subd. 2.B.7. of the zoning ordinance, The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. b. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and/or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. e. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. f. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. g. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. h. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. i. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. Staff recommends finding that the project meets these requirements. Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 13 • In addition to those general findings, a CUP for a concrete product plant must include the following provisions (Sec. 8 Subd. 2.I.9): a. All applicable Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements are satisfactorily met. b. A drainage system subject to the approval of the City Engineer shall be installed. c. Storage areas are landscaped, fenced and screened from view of neighboring uses, abutting residential zoning districts and public rights -of -way in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.S. d. Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. e. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be compliance with the applicable provisions of Appendix C of the City Code. f. Provisions shall be made to control and minimize noise, air and water pollution. g. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare or public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying the conditions. These provisions are addressed in the recommended conditions of approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Site Plan, Amended Conditional Use Permit, Amended Interim Use Permit The following list includes specific conditions and then specifies which permit and/or approval it applies to. The "entire site" is the entire 55 acres, which is covered by the conditional use permit. The northern portion is the 20 -acre area zoned LI and covered by the interim use permit. The southern portion of the site is 35 acres and is zoned GI. The site plan review is for the proposed new extruded precast manufacturing building, overhead cranes, silos, and associated grading and site work. • • • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 14 Underlined passages were added based on the discussion at the September 26 neighborhood meeting Staff recommends approval of the applications with the following conditions: 1. All permits /approval required by the Rice Creek Watershed District, including drainage and grading and wetland delineation, shall be obtained prior to any site grading. The Watershed permit applies to the overall conditional use permit for the concrete plant, covering the entire site, as well as the site plan review. 2. Final utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer prior to site grading or building permit. This condition applies to the overall conditional use permit for the concrete plant, covering the entire site, as well as the site plan review. 3. If off - street parking creates safety concerns in the future, the City shall re- examine the parking needs and may require additional parking spaces. This condition applies to the overall conditional use permit for the concrete plant, covering the entire site. 4. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction of the new building. All proposed structures shall comply with applicable City building material requirements. An escrow shall be established according to City policy as part of the building permit to insure completion of all site improvements. This condition applies to the site plan review. 5. The approval of the site plan and amended conditional use permit includes the 70± foot height of the cement silos, as provided by Sec. 3. Subd 4.C.3. of the zoning ordinance, which allows a building height to exceed the zoning district standard with a conditional use permit. 6. The surfacing material of the site as shown on the submitted site plan and grading plan is acceptable. Additional bituminous areas may be paved and additional crushed asphalt may be applied without additional review by the City. This condition applies to the overall conditional use permit for the concrete plant, covering the entire site. 7. Outdoor lighting is prohibited in the site's outdoor storage area (north of 77th St./Thomas St.). Permissible exterior lighting on the southern portion of the property shall be hooded and directed to reflect light away from neighboring residential properties and rights -of -way. This condition applies to the overall conditional use permit for the concrete plant, covering the entire site, as well as the interim use permit on the northern portion. • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 15 8. Lighting fixtures on the new building shall be the KAD model of the Contour Series with a lens that does not extend below the fixture (submitted to the City 9/19/2001). Additional information on the lighting on the overhead crane and storage area beneath it, including a photometric plan and fixture cut sheets, shall be submitted and reviewed prior to City Council consideration of the applications. This condition applies to the site plan review. 9. The site's western access point (from 4th Avenue) shall remain at the 77`h St./Thomas St. alignment. Access to Lilac St. shall be maintained as on the plans received by the City August 13, 2001. This condition applies to the overall conditional use permit for the concrete plant, covering the entire site, as well as the interim use permit on the northern portion. 10. A minimum 150 -foot setback shall be maintained along the site's northern boundary. The buffer yard consisting of a berm with plantings shall extend 40 feet north into this 150 -foot setback line (i.e., the berm shall be maintained in the southern part of the 150 -foot setback). The berm shall be maintained at an eight foot height. This condition shall apply to both the overall conditional use permit on the entire site for the concrete plant as well as the interim use permit in the northern portion. 11. Trucks serving Molin shall not park along Lilac Street. Molin and its agents shall inform drivers of this condition. This condition shall apply to the overall conditional use permit on the entire site for the concrete plant. 12. All applicable MPCA requirements shall be satisfactorily met. This condition shall apply to the overall conditional use permit on the entire site for the concrete plant. 13. The following noise mitigation efforts shall be utilized: a. The outdoor storage yard on the northern portion shall be arranged such that truck backing maneuvers toward residential properties are minimized. This condition applies to the interim use permit. b. Molin equipment and trucks shall be outfitted with strobe lights to replace backup beepers during nighttime hours (6:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.). Because use of strobes rather than beepers has been approved by the Minnesota Dept. of Labor and Industry, OSHA, this condition shall apply to both the overall conditional use permit on the entire site for the concrete plant as well as the interim use permit in the northern portion. However, this prohibition on beepers does not apply to semi - tractors that are not owned by Molin operating on the southern (GI zone) portion of the property. Nor does this prohibition apply to equipment being used on construction projects anywhere on the site. • If, in the future, there is some reason under law why the strobes are not sufficient, • • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 16 Molin shall be required to apply for an amendment to the conditional use permit and interim use permit. c. There shall be no outdoor cutting, sawing, grinding, or similar activity anywhere on the site before 8:00 a.m. on Saturdays. (This prohibition does not apply to truck loading or movement of product.) This condition applies to the conditional use permit for the concrete plant covering the entire site. d. There shall be no shuttle lifts, fork lifts, trucks, or other equipment operated in northern interim use permit area earlier than 8:00 a.m. on any day. This condition applies to the interim use permit. 14. a. The new landscaping plan dated received by the City October 2, 2001 shall be the approved plan. All plantings shall be in place by June 2002. Plantings shall be maintained in a healthy state. Dead plantings shall be replaced in a timely manner. This condition applies to the overall conditional use permit on the entire site for the concrete plant as well as the interim use permit for storage in the northern portion of the site. b. In addition, trees or other plantings shall be planted in the northeast portion of the site for screening purposes. These plantings may be small and provide screening in the future as they grow. A drawing showing the location of these additional plantings as well as a list of the plantings shall be submitted before review of this application by the City Council. This condition applies to the overall conditional use permit on the entire site for the concrete plant as well as the interim use permit for storage in the northern portion of the site. 15. The interim use permit on the northern portion, zoned LI, allows for storage, not production. No production or finishing activities shall be conducted in this area. This includes cutting, grinding, and other such work. 16. The interim use permit will expire if there is a change in the land use in the LI District on the northern portion of the site. 17. The following conditions that were approved on October 27, 1997 shall no longer apply: - condition 11 a. requiring storing wall panels parallel to the buffer yard (berm); - condition 13 c. requiring a solid row of coniferous trees on the north side of the berm and a row of deciduous trees on the south side of the berm; - condition 13 e. requiring irrigation for the berm. 18. A noise analysis shall be performed to test compliance with MPCA noise standards. This analysis should be completed prior to City Council review of the current • • • Molin Concrete October 10, 2001 page 17 applications. 19. The existing outdoor core slab casting bed (outdoor concrete pouring) shall be eliminated as soon as the new extruded precast manufacturing building is completed. This condition shall apply to the site plan and the conditional use permit covering the entire site. OPTIONS 1. Approve the amendment of the conditional use permit, amendment of the interim use permit, and the site plan with the conditions listed in the report. 2. Deny the amendment of the conditional use permit, amendment of the interim use permit, and the site plan, and list reasons for the denial. 3. Continue the public hearing and return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 rr—omwrew-war-pc, FIAMINri Eckgrargil6E4-91 neendil I 11.111 ir 1111121E111011115.41 NTY-STAII-ele--111eN I IIDEFILUPS4 I I AlingrE2174111Clie AMERTIIMMTAZIn /9 a- --------- - - - - tt> III 1111-11111111111111111 :jr. RM1Dpf. 5I ta IA, 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 Iatr3 al 1111111 5 IAL----- 4144P l Etpanirs 4. al imi 4- - Ilm. =mere ,„ 4. gtil in asalki.tdoor. 110.0 ° ciongs, ..fflic .9m,y61 ... r. I 6 8 GEORGE 20 111 le 11 w11111E111111 riimuunt a ppm Dew MO ( En "al Will.rElial EIVE1 la MUM 1E2 jaw Ar, " as ISM MI er," Zal MIMI II= fig zarrnmer2 r, wilEIMAIS Ind LEI arKIIMMII IIIIII 1° gorlIfS.111 ICI BRIM= MI OM Ng imp =OK lied Ablail W / kk4;44 ‘ le le 13 10 le P � E ,E 1-1111i.11I ,._L 1 ' 47 NO 50 E YA$N 9 sR£ET "6 S 8 - 443101-FfL --NW 11- -4P14114-F •. •IOW PL+ f N 'l gen's� 7 n • $ 2■ 00.07 r---1 01117C• A• 7 1 2' I 1 2 3 •, 5 •' 12 J 17 16 • b 14 13 C4 AIR OUTLOT 8 PARK 15 10 5 e 3 10 5. 7NC. e.i1U C9 ' . • • 5? •iolihi • • • 11 T[µ, ;taxi s MARSHAN LAKE r RAN 1 SITU PLAN -- �A� - -- 0 •0 .P F PALM �IOPrAQ/ n-a Clatter 1 1 7w� 111 ORR "Ma! �Rals�� OW174 OM CIAO CASTOR fm mR. L*1 -0. ORM NR, KAT) •�, Tetra IAGTIaf . �Dnit. OM. Rosa • T. oval m T =KIM 1 1 forb mei 70 OVa VINO RR hiTLAND PIXIMA11011 F.RC. A CRAWL flag NSA 1 faTIMPIVI NO falalG ft1Y0( Ma+ w u% 00 SW Me RIERVE TM 1.) W • 004000000 00 I•11,1m MO OM Oa Mi TO nth* MD INTOOTAll NO*MY O NAY Dwref HAIL a fret UNPAVED CtaaA1101 Professional Design GIMP Archaecb f t+W�w. VS last Forth )trees toles 200 the (SOP) 114S-229111 P0 Vox 541 Fax. (son 545-2357 Northfield MN 77077 wwwprora..lpea„ Project TMs CONDI= P ODQ.7'S COMPANY Extruded Precast Manufacturing —erg Lino Lakes, Minnesota ks Mem lethal= 7 -16-01 CAE MED ION rOaq 7 -10-01 alt Cr Naas WRY= AMMO ION Cooroawt]N 11111710 PraaetR tat Saab r • cv-s AUG 1 3 2001 CITY OF L!No LAKES o 5 -18-01 REVIEW ISSUED fait WRIER O de Metes Drawings are Not w be acid to aborts *eerale a Co55d Prde.dn.i Design Creep for emitted a adiENrri dilwslar, et thew M canna with wad field I hereby awtlfy that tits plan, ape ificatka, or report was prepared by me co udder my direct .up.rvbbn and that 1 on a du* licensed Architect under the lam of the .fate at Minnesota Seroture Typal or Printed Nana C. Richard EEks pi 7 -16-01 Ga Ny 13045 Project *obeN Dar Drawn 7• Checked OyE Ca/might Professional Delp Gaup goat TMs Site Pisa Sheet A1.O $7am'31 f}-M i • q „ WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 11*! 1NMI WWI (171J *CCP mr. 11.rf Ma - UN WC. 1.Q f • W re01. —! COMM Xeli • • • • 1Di0r Mall - ta tlC MIT ?.27.16 --, 1 Ott 6C, Kalb YW • r-0 IMI.1 IF' '►.• '►., 1111Iili I'111 I iHu1Mi1111 U'111M111 llr!IIII11IIIIIi101111l 1l l ill_l 111111211111111111111101.211101111111111111111111111181111111111111111111121111111111 i 1111!111'111 V ;i6:IC :916 ;6111,1. 1 �!iiiilll ;m WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION CONTID I _— I— I—I�I MI i:3111 00.L 1.w • NO PIPE BOLLARD KUL r. MOW MOST 14111 PAWL PIPE BOLLARD PLAN sfxb r • 1-01 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION soak VW.r -r Professional Design Group Arddeca 7 .lyn... *OS rest horde Street Sdtu 200 w 1007) 64022115 PO Ns set 713c a 707) 440==43 Nothritld. MN SODA weworefddpcc.w Project *0. ColYQSla rmaaCra away Extruded Precast Manufacturing Building Lino Labes, Minnesota AUG 1 3 2001 CITY OF LINO LAK:=3 Pooldems 4 7 -27-01 CAC 00. 41 RIMED .Me01. ..0000 k 311001* .00 O I 7 -10-01 CRC MUM Felt SOWN 7 -10-01 CPC 1112/CD 1202 t001101110X41 MOM 1-5-0/ 000 .DR 0..01 WWII 0 0-74-01 IMO) FOR Oer0G 111.11811 0.127 Awned N Neter O rewlep w sot t. M scaled to sisals dY.wlaa Ceased Hrd ...nl Delp Group for endued or oikeereel dlsre.eie.4 or these Y coact wIdt marl field 1 hereby certify that Mk else, ep.e51calks, .r report ace prepared by no or wow Ty dbed r9enkien and that 1 am s duly tie eeed Mddlset under the l..s or the state of Minnesota. Sputum Typed or HAW Mee. C. Richard E0ee Doi. 7 -15-01 kg. Ma 17046 Project Modems Deep Dints Syr Chocked Sys Cep iftl* Ml.ri..d Delp 6«. Sleet Mee Exterior Elevations gb A2.0 • • • rUilff mum - IN ISac MUMMA MOODS NO CTTP.) FINN 1010 WSW rdN aEISi W ISM WARM I Tv a anti a. NT �i■�oa�41f P.) =1:11 a. (i) w 921 nX r � l 111 1■m iii1hU i 111111111 11111111 Milli 1111:6i ii . 1ii n �i1111iiiil'1i 1"1111W1111111 111111 n 111111 i1II111i u116iii1ii 111111 n■iii "11 1iy11 i i 111111111111 ii 11111111 1 ii411 1 1111 w�. N 1�� �■� �� ■■® ■®■■1111■113■WWI ■® ® ®■®■1N1111/11.1■■.11111111®•1111■AI11111111111111■■1111■®® 111 i Ind , ■I I II 1 :I i i NL MAST InXTRRIOR RLRVATION 1CM. wars FI11 WWI tin • ld0 MR OM. 1sa. P.C. w` PIND3 Nary ISM FINN (TTP.) UOR FIRM NtELM 11 liiEi 4i®iii111i lull a11 iliiii i■"i1iili1li i .1111 111iiii 111111111116111111iiI k ii 1111 wii li IIiti1111 iiiiiI 'EAST RXt'iRIOR LLKVATION CONTI) IOUs w • rr NORTH IXTRRIOR ELSVATION WAS SW - - Professional p_a_dgo Croup Mounts / aw.w. 10$ rest Pour* Soso. Sala 200 211a (3 07) 145-2298 PO 1w■ Ddt ra■. 11$71 545-2313 tIordl4w4 W4 23817 www.profdedsimoto =CUTS PRODUCTS COMPANY Extruded Precut Manufacturing Building Lino Like., Minnesota Kay ▪ ' AUG 1 3 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES Redline • I 7 -27-41 CPI AG0. 11 RUSKS MOLL FROM a 9N000$ dJU 7 -81-01 CIE ISSUED FOR MOO 7_10.01 ar RO O 10. WOIO.WNON NrEi1Na 0-1-01 MOOD FOR OMB MICR s-m-o1 MUSD FOR Own ■MEIN D.1. AFpe_d M Ooewh.M. Ilstr Onw'1oa w not to be said to stole d ■wISINRa Onto* ►nf..YO.I O.Ip GM M ..dttad . adilimel dt♦1.dS.r N Yam Is coact wRh octal INN w..w- I hero* certify that this pion, ,OrdNeatkM1 or report era prepared by era or under ivy direct iapi..kn and that 1 ern a duty EkwnM Arch! act under the lea of the state of Minnesota. 5er Typal or Prided Ilan. C. Richard Eta. 0i 7 -18-01 g Mo. 17040 Project Mea4er1 Oa s Draws Chocked art Capydstrt nof.dwrt D.Ip Gaye 071!1.07 7.2741 YAM/TIM CIE 2001 Sheet TNIo Exterior Elevations A2.1 • • • GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION ` CONTROL PLAN MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS Lino Lakes. Minnesota S H E R W p 0 D Net Rd 1 89•,f 9 r02/'9' fri A11.e 101011 AV. North 3,. of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1 \4 of Sec, 8, T31, R22. 132_4 iv 1RAONO SL213, AC1( LINE ry • 1 Ile A 4330 QI.Yd. I South One or tho S 1/2 of the NTI 11 of Dv 1 \4 of Sea e. , T31, R22. 75 air ...._ • _.....0=termonmew, � , t. ' ....._.:_...................), .. ..1.1�1'ee.R.w ________ .... � e.+f NEGIV k AS 10 ORANAS pp E X I S T I N G WOW AVct CIR7*110 AND STORAGE w, VE { �'k O ,r G' A a • 588•00'00'E `.• 260.00 �e 0 North line of the South 832 ft of the SW 1/4 of the SW /4 J 11 s • (the South 412 ft ■ ■■ 4 oche SW 1/4 Irene _ Pad • w .0 -4 it MUM OMB I III 1 ) .lea a THE 3a S8 •06"00"E I Aa A.O. sew rENO —s — — Now. not CONCRETE 415 LILAC ST ONO LAWS MI !1064 e0) 601.70. R! ewe lee•amD ,.>d.6-_ J 10 S00 °44 '48 "W VICINITY sw , p TAP R0.. n ROCK CONSTRUCTION EMRANCE EROSION CONTROL NOTE$ 0611.111 0 10 nor 11 ft "Wi .00 lC �ewa ft) MAWS 100 06en)=ied 4~ �'�n 104,er Ya •"omen w.. • 0Reenn 10 MISIMIIIIA hnw se wraw m 040•0111/ M �l. / ly. der -� SET F19FCE V. me eure.r LEGEND: 1) ..—=' 7 O..M.. 1,•0e Cw10.1 2) —1.— 0.0.1.. 5,2•1171 Vase 31– e. – M.M.. Welty DM& Dem. Pr0ese4 Inn 6) 0 Owe. Van. One. Weft. 0) a.e.0 &illy Reel rwM.m. 0) 21 a..an 0...e... e.M 00.010. q = OnM.. h.... 00*. . S) el PleeeDOMM !N r... St /4 Cor. R22, Foun. Cost Iron Aa.IR or* Not W Moo Nis 0104 Jo 0.r r ••• * dy..Y — /M b00 M /r — 00- MOO a 1110.0010 sao Ass AQ OWN 0.000 16.11 a..4...R.. *we ..two .e..00 anew., toe .r Y.MM M e..IN .IM.. • .el lean .M le w we.Me NM ea. ee ea* M1.n.b+1Y. w M M tee. oel M 0.14. w q r ..em, I. 0..7/ S..M to Ye. MMY. » Oa Maw 110• M~M (b0.) .M�W OW ImMW MOM 6)j Van Vw 11.1w M.• W 1••• IwN. M M .px 0A.. ,an. M Y w 1.00 en .Y M I.Yei.. Nee *.e.1 ryn A. 0 e.sr. M OA.. ele en-a• 0.100.0 • *WOW le 60 t) Me 00 M 1Rn1.M. MIA • Iu. ,eel e.aw. lM .01l1 606 See eel 0040* V.Ob.• M MOM. M le R.M. w0. Ree. n R....r 601 din.... M *ley w e0*01.0 . • Iw4sel* CORWAC10R Wit 101e 1[011' LOCATION MO 00101011 Or o ul w 00 Ah Olxa?N.ac 1[� A 1104 D rUCIOl0ACAC rl OO SO.D002INaA OwO! ROCK 011100S OWL It w LIM MAN E0 FUT N 10081 MO AS Vu AS ItfZSMT FOR WMOC. OS[ 1' 10 T 061110 ROM. 71010 f01 12M000 SOAR M[ e11101016 OR WA10 10 11 11 WWI 00 IMSM 0KRrIC MUM* MI Obb= 06740 00 MUM.O nwdz. . [T 0VAld sAMIR ILA WD 00 RCOM 100 On R d*eleeO�y AI�41.1.,R4 PLOW Mw1 NC MO WWI* Air[ at Mat /11@ M ANrd -JM 011y )S/ -lele ea. MAIM - Otte SAM • LEGEND: 1) — >- 2)—>- 3)—t._ 4) — 1 — Denotes Proposed Sanitary Sewer Denotes Existing Sanitary Sewer Denotes Proposed Watermoin Denotes Existing Wafer-main Denotes Existing Electric Denotes Proposed Storm Denotes Storm Drain Manhole Denotes Sanitary Sewer Manhole EXISTING UTILITIES 1) The Mormotion shown on these droerw,ga concerning twie and location of existing utilities Is not guaranteed to be accurate or a6 Inclusive. The controctor Is responsbfe for making his on determination as to the two and location of utilities es may be necessary to ovoid damage to these utilities. 2) The Controctor shop be responoble for existing utility locations. Cog Gopher Stott One of (651) 454 -0002 for locations. (TARN' SVAIM 1) 5onhory Sew Service shod be 6- PVC SDR 35 unless otherwise noted. 2) Sewer :Service locations and elevations shod be verified N the field prior to eonetruetion. WATERMANN 1) Water Ser4Ce stroll be 8' PP. 0 z 15' RC 696.0 I . r A 0 17 1 North line of the SW • UTIL1TY PLAN MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS Limo Lakes, Minnesota GRAPHIC SCALE s» -12.8 r• 5' -12' RCP LE. 969.31 EX. t5' RC STORM 5E*R FUIURE BLDG. EX. G FFE 906.5 lbwR.E. 901.60 yrLE. 899.30 API tx. 8' PVC SM. SEW. ccgss 870 sq.ft. Edge of 'Water � Y" f the South 412 ft 4 of the SW 1/4 36.1 36.1 (A 7JQ) 1 !soh w 60 d. ipflv EXTEND SERVICES INTO BUILDING AT LOCATION DESIGNATED BY OWNER 34.6 m Conc. Enclosure cc! v.e.. G /� 1 - 0 EX. Nei RE. ap.5511 v 2' Conc. V Curb 33 13 236.3 74.972 sq.ft. EXISTING BUILDING (F.F.E. 905.5 + / -) CONNECT TO EX B' DIP WATERMAIN W/ TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE 28.3�� /a /;' M i/, 14.5:- 36.0/ BUILDING SETBACK LINE Conc. Ret -Wolfs Dirt Roads EX. MN R.E. 903.50 LE. 993.38 1,870 sq. ft. PATCH AND REPAIR EX 81TUMNOUS AS 6' -90' BEND 6' -45' BEND 1 -story conc. office bldg. ta/ 6.511 sq. ft. 30.00'0 // /O) 10 00 /a0 n% 1/49.5 4 Propane Tanks . Fence Tete. Box Sign A R_E A HYDRANT .:1 • M EXISTING B11UM1NOU LILAC 673.00 :STREE 1 of the SW 1/4 0 �s o — LiJ v - t E �-- East 26 10-2' -- -e - Conc. Trans. Pod N00 °44'48 "E -- - ■- ccp. rf O 1058.901 t A.G. MON A.G. d.Etxm C.G.S. S89 °nn' no" R 'PREPARED FM+ MOUN CONCRETE 415 LILAC ST LINO LAKES MN 55014 (651) 706 -7722 FAX: (051) 716 -0229 / Aeneby certify that tf• plan was prepared by me or under my divot supervision one Mot / orrr o dldy Licensed Pro- fess/ono/ Engineer under the taws of the STote of 4G•xnesoto. MAO G SC/VC/MVO /AM 8 /10/01 REG N. 41295 Siff H4MIRI4 DAJACEINYG PLOW ENt3N AC. 053) 765-WC 91A7 LD0 67VN Alf:NLE ACE CVO/ /WES MY 55074 -3625 FM' (7163) 766-6007 • • • DATE: 8/9/01 C2 LEGEND: 1):"`:: Denotes 2) Denotes 3) »- Denotes 4) -S- Denotes 5) - - -- Denotes Existing Contour Proposed Countour Proposed Storm Silt Fence Silt Fence PlantitupPlren failisdilltimdieLroadascliauxiLSeedlag Math* Platt Seeding and E Management 1. Prior to site groan the entire area to be added Mead be treated rah a nen-Meade spetank herbiado The NIA effectively eliminate the roMa of the Madam Mode emetic plant speofm Including reed canary ands. amok =doodad crane gran. and Canada that* If the area i not treated o0egwt Mar to sot disturbance. long -tern, meantime and tin In sgAty of the native p661 arwrwmty may be gosMlonabls 2. DM the ate to prepare the seedbed for eee/rq. 3. canoe and peak the am to be seeded. This MI create an adequate seedbed for Rea seeding. Paaetq sal be oanddred adequate when only a alga footprint U left In 1st sal MW mean cacao de 4. Proceed with seeding In late May to mid .tree with the Malted "sake seed mature and apterapiela sow crop. A H the area to be seeded U Nadi or weeper in shape. broedooMYq seed with hand �ecripmed U adequate. Equjwnnt mast be capable of troadeaM Molly and light seed without plugging or settling In the baling chamber. B. if the area to be seeded le large and regular in Mops. aaed4q should � ad spsekily designed m i a seed dill C. are ta A for and 2-3 pounds per acre for iidlowe "vodka owes rates for drilled sesame are 11 -12 pound per oar* for grease and 1.5-2 pounds per can for 66d agars. 5. H the Mad l broadcast. the area stand be harmed and pecked again. this all preside the beet to seed antral and madnhe 1st certainty of sesdrrq astable hme.t. 6. Ciao notes grew mulch should be applied In moderate thkkmes. Mulch sade Ably applied when eapro.bnatay SOX of the soil . Is viable after 7. 1st seeding site should be mooed at least one time during the seeding year and 2 tines in the first year after seeding. Moeda Mould be completed ran weeds are no more than three feet tail. Mooing height shoed be cep roedmoaly she ache* If the mowed rrmetl 1s heavy It Maid be rammed to present 'ano1riq' the nee eeedngo 8. Spot trachomt with a herbicide to eliminate undesirable wade within the eataWlMM Mond may be requred to aOsquct y e b.b.ate undesired, Plant speden Ss& tiffs 6666141.0* lad PCONLMIs Canada aid M Cord e :livn Mader %e1M��recneeenbulrw� Over bldnM .Itue joint war Mattiebrush Bulrush Wady Cared Bunged Mud Pentad Water terrdork ildkara Marcel Illadoyed sued am Wad )lavers rent rtw Ratt.POed°" d►K Ni. angland �K Was pralris Sneasseed Omer Joe M Vend Screamed Parpe prod. *Mr Dodd elemandsr des arhbow r inerhhAAan sur6awr Pars basing sear Great Slue Lobelia Mash .966.d due tim ilarated Mkt Melded Astor bend Andrapown aurora 20.011 Weigand, nears 111.011 Eyed ear.d«.Ms 25= PPe bairn striatum 0.=1 dymerto panda 5.111[ Samos velars 2.0K Sodas atro*en. 2.118 Seem IohiaA, 2.06. OMwnga.u. dnalemie 2.178 Cores *armee 1.08 Sardis mariros 4.08 Allem um SOB )00.0% Eupaarbim perfa etwa 6.00* Mudpesia trio 10.00% %rune hsetda 5.01* Mrohceetrum vlr¢i ian 0506. Mariana 16leow 300* Mar madam 1.50ft Aar norw -angbe 3.06%0 1hdoIwn nwtoorpm 3.00* Dales aandleah 5.00X Helesk.. outward 1.00* Sammie loacei ILO= Dales papered 15A08 Zkea am. 3.008 Mikado bdan6rdde. 5.0= lidant w. moshnala8 2.0118 pyarroglachns 4.01= LaOda aphelico 1.031 Aac,pid hornola 500% Iris vrskaor 2.0= Rdeido pinned 7.00% Pyanathemen vigihlrn 1.00% toaom4 WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS Lino Lakes, Minnesota 6,4411.66.. ter 9nnr Ara 8Naig Grose biesetem Mee bantam sideoate rorno Cando Aid rye men grass mode closer 1pB.lroeplksryrd sumo BM* prone cam Common Yarrow Hoary what^ Prdrli dlparw -H Sort Widowed Goad Goldenrod goldenrod raw ragoerr Smooth Bice Mier Isr6sat golden wader Meam6kn eoMowr Partridge Pea Canada tick lades Prairie 1aa getr Sorgaetnm natal Andropogon ward. Bade= curtipenduia Dams conadensis Paniam vagdum R.M0atlo Arta Dada Ma a do sea Dada aadidern Adele. milefWkrn Verbena arida 6etddo drool* Tradescatlo brocteMo Swamp Sd Meads opel i AeMOnuholdee Asir Lavoie Moe entry Hatlan6aas madnan& Cassia fasieOuto Damodar, aeodenses Lire pyondtaanyo 1808 30.0% 10.0% 15.0% SDI 100.0% 15.06. 15.* 4.1* 5.0% 1.116. 5.Ot 130% 1.0% 2.004 5.116. 1214 1.176. 7.031 30% 100.0% A.G. 110414, A.G. canto C.G.S. 1 1 CO I• )0 °44'48 "E lo GRAPHIC SCALE se es W a (111 Pipe) 1 doh es W !t. 14.4 Ads WETLAND FILL AREA (11,466 SQ. FT.) MITIGATION AREA (13,201 SQ. FT.) BUFFER AREA - 5 :1 (9,963 SQ. FT.) / / N89 °09 '02LS W rtal:.onoao rear aag000 uceoaaan0o 1oaortn ©o as n D ii[s ❑t1 A r17 '*rnaoo 901 900 1899 898 897 908 . 4011• eta ...roe........._......_... • BUFFER AREA (5:1 SLOPE FOR MN. 16.57 WETL N TYPICAL ,S PROPOSED 1FETLAND EDGE 1897 ROA1SED l;ALAND BOUNDAII Y 901 900 PROPOSED WETLAND SURFACE (.YINIMUY 1{0° HYDRIC SOILS) Ave .. .Y/ : 20:1 kBENCH MINIMUM) 899 USE SEED XIXJTJ - BO77711 (893) 898 FOR WE7' AREA 897 PREPARED FER. MOUN CONCRETE E 415 LILAC ST LINO LAKES MN 55014 (851) 766 -7722 FAX (651) 796 -0229 / hereby cede), that this plan no propored by me or under my diroct supertivon and thud / am o duly Lkensed Pro- fessional Engineer under tin laws of the ,late of Minnesota. c131 0. SCI4111CHTINC DATE: 8/9/V1 RrG liGi 41295 Siff PYAMMW D ICIA ERpC PLOW AC. 97W LLt8t1;MN MAW N.Z loan HIES MI 55?14- .71!25 (71iJ) 7D5-10I3 FAX ()1ST) 71/6- -61277 - _ - KEY PLAN Pi sod-o• 50.-01 A. E. 02-CP '42211 '. II //I_ 4■.. 0-01 20 MI A • 124-11 0-47 4047( NT. PlANTNIG 12 • ass.-tP 20-0. nu( 441. MAirrm ZONE C • 987-0 nix HT. PLANTING BROM • NORM PRCPERTT LINE 20-0' BASE PLANTING 17-0' MK PLANT ZOE I) • 610-0. 547-20- 97-0' 0440997001 MIES Of ROAD PLANTING HEIGHT DIAGRAM e NORTH PROPERTY LNE — — r WOE MEND MKT JUMPER 1(XY-0• 1001. 20-47 VERT. SNOW "P' e Oa lir ( 04. ■ '441e, mor-==z1W-7 1110 da, Me lip ,I•F viva& 0 )•■ j" pi Ai PI_ Al b 4693 42010 SECTION * ZONE "A" LOOKING EAST NO SCALE 97-0.106691 71117TI4 AVI06 BRILLINCE 440170 PM 5004000 90997 20 99900 PLANTING PLAN NORTH PLANT SLIPPER W-CI MAX NT. PLANTING - 7i_ilkAt2amgra, 94051920 04.301099 *********** 0 0 110`-ft 201-01 MAX 110. PLANTING —COLORADO SLUE SPRUCE LPLANTING PLA 0 WEST PLANT BUFFER r. 50.-V Professional Design Group Arditects / 105 East fourth 50eet Suite 200 PO Box 641 Northfield, IMN 55057 Om (507) 645-22911 fax. (307) 645-2353 �Q!1! Rooms COMPANY Master Plan Lino Lakes, Minnesota Key PIm 1 I 0-1-01 BDE BERN HILIONT/PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS O I 11-21-97 DEB ISSUED FOR 990109 40.094 Rev/ I Dee I APPr".' DeaclipUon Note D rawings are not to be scaled to obtain dimensions. Contact Professional Des‘. Group far omitted or additional dimensions, or show In conflict with actual field mess I hereby certify that this pion, specificotion, or report woe prepared by me or under my direct supervision ond that I am o duly registered Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesoto. Date. Reg No Project Number: 97121.01 Data 11-21-97 Drawn •r MR Chided Or AFR Copyright Professional Design Group 1997 Sheet Mit Planting Plan REC N ED OCT 02 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • C9 • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQURIED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 5B Tanda Gretz October 10, 2001 Approval of a 3.2 -foot Variance To Allow a 6.8 Side Yard Setback For A Single Family Residential Building. Cornerstone Home Builders, For Property Located at: 6483 Clearwater Creek Drive 3/5 vote This is a new construction in an R -1 Zone with a PDO. This report is based on Certificate of Surveys from Pioneer Engineering. The home is now approximately 90% complete, but has been built 3.2 feet into the side yard setback. Construction was begun in spring of this year, with the foundation work done in March. On March 27, 2001 City building inspectors signed off on footings work, based on the staked property. Both the inspectors and the contractor admit there were large piles of excess dirt at the site and frost conditions, which can make measuring difficult. As a further complication, the lot is only just large enough to accommodate the home, with no room for any error in siting or construction in terms of side yard setbacks. Plans call for the home to be sited exactly ten feet from the side property line on the residence side, and five feet from the side property line on the garage side. In August, while out on inspections, City building inspectors noticed that the side yard setbacks seemed close, and called the contractors attention to it. The contractor then had an "as- built" survey done, and it was found that the home was built into the side yard setback on the residence side by 3.2 feet. • • • ANALYSIS An error was made in siting, and the home sits 6.8 feet from the property line rather than the required ten feet. The builder is requesting a 3.2 -foot Variance from the City's required side yard setback of ten feet. The home in question abuts neighboring garages on both sides, rather than the residences. According to the City attorney Bill Hawkins, contractors and homeowners are ultimately responsible for making sure a home is sited according to specifications. Mr. Hawkins further offered the counsel that other Municipalities in similar situations have issued Variances when other remedies for correction were not suitable. FINDINGS FOR VARIANCE In considering all requests for a Variance and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. A Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued to a property currently in violation of City Code, without a Variance. Re- siting the existing home would be required to correct the violation and meet City Code. This seems impractical for a home that is 90% complete, thus a Variance is needed in order to allow reasonable use. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property and not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner is due to a mistake in siting the home. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Reasonable use will require that a Certificate of Occupancy be issued, which will require a Variance. Hardship is exhibited due to difficulty in re- siting a home that is 90% complete. 4. That granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. The proposed Variance would allow a side yard setback that is less than what is required under City Code. Denial of the Variance, however, would require re- siting a home that is 90% complete. • 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Approving the Variance would allow a side yard setback of less than what is required under City Code, but provide resolution for a non - conforming structure that is now 90% complete. OPTIONS 1. Approval of the Variance. 2. Denial of the Variance. 3. Return to Staff with directions. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. • • *elk) I est.) i2.4d !Iv.. -52-4-4- 4-d6 N3.0, X57L «i k • • SEP 1 0 2001 CITY OF LL'i;:i FLE4Durvi-oit\L; fi9-(fx D cLE t3 ift:1-9 L.; 1 Dem4c., t-itAlscc- (k) i-•;) -r-C . 0 No t,-12 7-71-67 6 m-,Q. k&-Ai )4- 17-711Q-t ensti k)/(0 c111.0M H-6 -Ai- —tr-i-tc 31csr-3k cn-tui (k)i+!=. ISIL On 67tcrLd U) G C e- CD IQ ift_44 i L.,a5 tuto -F-TO UOT-, ) (44 U.1.-46t, 6.61C-i-1- Boy 44-cart,-7-72- i4"J ONI-Fit.2_, ts12,r1- iLoc-TyL., eqj I*9 - (33 0 1-1--ft-4=. Wti 141-01 L&JOrL t -rife t--bync- i\st9z, D)M'T Nc-t\3 (A; 1-6 KITi-l-ED (iz_Yr poi NT? 6/(9 77-HuL,Fax )(1-T ( 717k-t-: L---In'-561171-0j1C, /4/ fifi-s2D5itip -71-1-7 c 6-i-ft,p46q0 fri040 (416-7-Lc f 7VRIVO 7Z) VICAIV- I A/ 5C)) Oa) /, A/6(60(4;53 C PO6T45 a> .PQ , o ze `101122:) -4- 'U' 1+1+117 • • • • Fcr tve,sitv / -Tti-e- 4-- kV\ Nr.C1+ .V.-Aft-A Vi,v/ y P -4- Mak) •11-1LL, L5t5- 1D° TJ (77 W it*Ak: .S1,4<..TUL,0 1-411-0•6 K 120D . 42.(12AA* (1C-RAJogt6i.iC (1 w)E,Qpiz&s. • * PIONEER * engineering fxrawenwromaxiamoeow LAND SURVEYORS • CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendoto Heights, MN 55120 (651) 681 -1914 FAX: 681 -9488 525 Highway 10 N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 (763) 783 -1880 FAX:783 -1883 Certificate of Survey for: CORNERSTONE HOME BUILDERS House Address: CLEARWATER CREEK DRIVE CLEARWATER HYo.4z z •z .oS78 °43'34»E 6 921,4 DRI vE, 4=-04°06'5 18 1733 9•5.z 0929.6) 22 vacant SEP 1 0 2001 CITY Ci ' LINO LAKES 1 —= "916 100yR_917 • g X so0.o Denotes Existing Elevation 41110 . 10 Denotes Proposed Elevation Min. Lowest Opening. 923.0 Min. Lowest Floor Elevation: 921.0 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS Lowest Floor Elevation: gz3.6' r . ..c 931_5 * 4- * PIONEER * engineering LAND SURVEYORS • CIVIL ENGINEERS Certificate of Survey for: House Address 20 ExrsnNC HOUR. LAND PLANNERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651) 681 -1914 FAX: 681 -9488 625 Highway 10 N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 (763) 783 -1880 FAX:783 -1883 CORNERSTONE HOME BUILDERS CLEARWATER CREEK DRIVE Foundation As —Built 8 -28 -01 CLj`4RA TR � CRE'E'K DRIVE RIVE 344E 69.19 R-94V6'S s 1733218 0/1 g 0 co (NI CO r 15;2 /o,'• o 1 /5 SnNC NOusE WALkOUT d ;cis 22.0 GARAGE GARAGEER 1 / 51 1 ;1 21 �1 I 1 Lam\ 5 0 x soo.o Denotes Existing Elevation x•LR-11) Denotes Proposed Elevation '424w WETLAND 1"'R9916 80.11 O 0 cr- 22 SEP 1 0 2001 t_; It 3 Min. Lowest Opening: 923.0 Mir,. lowest Floor Elevation- EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS Lowest Floor Elevation. 923:5 923.0 Ton of Block Elevation_ 93-1:5' 932.2 • • • AGENDA ITEM V. C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: October 10, 2001 TOPIC: Minor Subdivision, 62xx Hodgson Rd. Part of Lot 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107 John Dahl, Emerald Custom Homes, Inc. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The application is to remove a portion of land from one parcel and attach it to the adjacent parcel. That is, the action will move the lot line approximately five feet. The purpose for the proposed action is to settle a question regarding the property boundary. This report is based on the document "Survey For: Emerald Construction ", by Hy -Land Surveying, Inc., dated July 23, 2001. Mr. Dahl is purchasing the lot from Mr. John Tobish. As part of the sale of the property, Mr. Dahl had a survey prepared. The survey determined that the irons marking the property corners were incorrectly placed. That is, the irons are not located according to the legal description of the property. The legal description is just that —the legal description of the property boundaries. However, Mr. Tobish and the neighboring property owners, the Bakers, have always assumed that the iron monuments represent the property line. In order to avoid a dispute over the property boundary, Mr. Dahl prefers simply to split off the strip of land and deed it over to the Bakers. This requires a minor subdivision approval by the City. The property is zoned Rural. This lot comprises one acre when measured to the centerline of Hodgson Rd. The lot was created prior to the 10 -acre minimum lot size now required in the Rural zone. The strip of land to be removed is approximately 1328 square feet, or 0.03 acre. The application involves a very minor change and poses no concern for public health, safety, or welfare. Mr. Dahl plans to construct a new house on the lot. That will require a building permit. The typical building permit review will address such issues as setbacks, a driveway permit from Anoka County, a culvert under the driveway, and septic system requirements. • • • Dahl Minor Subdivision page 2 Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision with the following conditions: 1. The strip of land of approximately 0.03 acre removed from the parcel must be combined with the lot to the south. Proof of the recording of the new legal descriptions must be furnished to the City by the applicant within 10 days of the recording. OPTIONS 1. Approve the minor subdivision with the condition listed. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 COUNTY PARK H _3 RESHANAU1 y1EHER, ,ADD,' 1I rr it rEfi!! afa AD f ARK j _.NW . -AMY _e 01;0. OM AIM r. of �D((�N�VWtAK;�I'i LQ, fl \ t I ll f I ... #4,oAai:BS Aov (#) 54 (;3) 41 (20) 53 (/"2 42 s7) 52 (4) 43 (z) 51 (49) 44 (2) 50 (2) 45 (24) 49 (z/) 46 48 (, ; 446 440' 47 440.00 440.00 - -290 -- LI NDA 4 (32) 4 04842 4 40.00 440.00 (29) 423.00 423.00 U.P.A. 440.00 EA$EMEI4fi /90.00 k 2 .0 a k /.0O:57 20 70./3 i AVE. (0) .6" 8.0-27 -s4rE •••••• e0¢.4a /.09.93 80 BO /9g /8 ' /7'44 (0) o (s/) " (1") gb.A4% - do T LINDA s ) • 4839 0 /6q ( °)/ 4 rs .09.0.0 • AV'. 41 80 67. d0 LANE eco 00 70.4' W v$ 20; / / 9 1 (6) (zs� ,•�w- .0P9 f6 2. > u vC ✓8.74 r. 2. k �) IG• a �� /0037. 84/0 19.7B tie) 3 (n) • /2',‘//% to 64 8 .0<E 087 29.72. SJ3 -9' / / (I) 440.09 osos��.44o.sd •00 ! --ZGf •• 300 (2) / .Oo A/ 68 °56'37 W 2/500 !o $Q. 9(o) ( //) /0 95 F.7- •o A./Ba".u'7714/ 505 !/88 °56,'37'w /3 7.910. 4 205. 00 /2 205.00 60 ROHAVIC ' 205.00 h .o C\� 0 0 2 (3) 2/9 99 A/ se 54'77'W 3 (4) 2/9 99 4 V1 ; (1) 7 /0 .4'4 7 (4) / $8 to-A/07-1,/ ON 2oS.ac 2/9.99 6 (7) 205. ao LANE 5 (`) 2%0.00 /90024.si ^W 200..9d 4 (2 0) �� m 200 3 ( /9) �W a a a° 200 2 ( /8) N N a N .200 / ( /7) a o (5) ■1 -7-7174.51 8 ,B7.b8✓ `'•"B0 240 3 a 4 (8) " (9) \ (10) COURT $ 2 8 2 9 (4 •--164.3•• (3) 8 IM - 14 ?°o, C 394') ' M� _24 Roos (396.00 _ j )_ 10 11 (6) AU D 2 3/. 90 (/b BOOS) 244' 231 30 (8) (8) NO. \ _- /320. 1 3 • LIJ / 1 ■ <C Cif /\ CJ LI, OF SEC.31, T.3I, R.22. THE NORTH LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 264.00 S89'13101 "E -9 0 3N1 30 3NI1 1S3M 3H1 HUM 1311Yetvd 3NI1 0 / a o / ▪ ££ 8 t0 n f M „II,Z£.00S 9L.091 (00'591) O a- h • fel cs- 0'SI go ,0 -,OZ 0 n 33N34IS321 O3SOd021d a ; N • ,z -,oz u es- 0'SI • Ol ,o-,or t� ► 3AINO 0 0 3 zz.$ 1 (l IL I a / I N i -141-4-Ae . 90'14 002 S'01 6r'01 0 M 0 tI ml J 0 N 0. 0 J 0 rs te' e a. ,/ p ' ` \\ —'Sd3W 6L'0££- N i 1 _ pC 1 rno -�;M..n %_q i ii i \\\ I In /' rMi r �o a (00'S91) 1. 1 *A� SOUTH LINE PER MONUMENTATION 4330 SL'Z££ M 3.II,Z£.00N 91'65I �02I NOSD [OH 48'S M M 'ZZ'd 'I£'1 1£'33S 3O -4/I 3S 3H1 JO t/I 3N 3H1 3O 3NI1 1S3M 3H1 CN ^: I V i�� v I I u AGENDA ITEM V. D. • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala P & Z MEETING DATE: October 10, 2001 TOPIC: McDonald's Site and Building Plan Review BACKGROUND The McDonald's project, located at the southeast corner of the Lake Drive /Apollo Drive intersection, previously received City Council approval on April 26, 1999 in conjunction with the JADT Development Group, LLP., Planned Development Overlay rezoning. A conditional use permit for the McDonald's drive- through was also approved at that time. Since the original approval date, the City has been working with JADT to facilitate the easterly extension of Apollo Drive to service the McDonald's site and the Market Place development. The City Council ordered the preparation of Plans and Specification for the Apollo Drive extension and Lake Drive improvements at the September 22, 2001 meeting. It is anticipated that construction will start in April of 2002 and be completed by mid June. In conjunction with the Market Place development City staff recommended changes to the McDonald's site plan to improve vehicle circulation and safety along Apollo Drive. These changes included the following: 1. Elimination of the right -in only access to McDonald's from Apollo Drive. 2. Realignment of the McDonald's service road to create a ninety (90) degree intersection with the proposed Market Place service road. 3. Relocation of access drive to the McDonald's parking lot to provide increased stacking distance on the service road from Apollo Drive These changes necessitated the need to rotate the McDonald's building on the site. McDonald's has accommodated these requests, however the changes did require resubmittal of the site plan for City approval. This review is based on the following updated plan submittals: Site Plan received 09/24/01 Landscape Plan received 09/24/01 Grading and Drainage Plan received 09/24/01 Building Elevations received 10/01/01 • 1 • McDonald's Site and Building Plan Review October 10, 2001 Page 2 ANALYSIS Zoning: The property is zoned Planned Development Overlay District (PDO). The underlying zoning district is SC, Shopping Center. Vehicular Traffic: Access to the site is provided via a service road extended southerly from the proposed Apollo Drive extension. Building: McDonald's is proposing to construct a restaurant of approximately 3,870 square feet. The proposed building exterior, as shown in the attached building elevations, is consistent with the "retro" design previously approved by the Town Center Committee in April of 1999. Parking: The standards for access and traffic circulation are outlined in Section 3, Subdivision 5 of the Zoning Ordinance. A total of 58 parking spaces are required based on 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. 72 spaces are provided, including three handicap accessible spaces in conformance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The dimensions of the parking stalls and drive aisles are in conformance with City requirements. Trash Enclosure: Trash and recycling handling activities are to occur in a enclosed area on the northeast side of the site. Architectural design of the enclosure should be provided i.e., construction material, height. Lighting: The applicant's submission did not include a photometric lighting plan nor does the site plan illustrate exterior lighting locations. According to Section 3 Subd. 4.H of the Zoning Ordinance, any lighting used to illuminate an off - street parking area must be hooded and arranged to deflect light away from public streets and adjacent properties. As a condition of site and building plan approval, a photometric plan and light fixture details should be submitted subject to review and approval by the City. Signage: The pylon sign located in the southwesterly corner of the site was approved as part of the original site plan on April 26, 1999. The sign is forty (40) feet in height with a total surface area, exclusive of the trademark golden arches, of 76 square feet. No revision has been submitted or requested. Wall signage is proposed to consist of two 126 square foot signs located on the west and east faces of the building as well as a trademark golden arch on the north and south sides of the building. The signs are depicted on the attached building elevations. The underlying SC, Shopping Center District sign requirements only allows one wall sign, not to exceed 100 square feet. However, the PDO designation allows for greater flexibility than what is generally possible under conventional zoning requirements. Given that the proposed wall signage is integral to the "retro" design, previously approved by the Town Center Committee, staff is comfortable with the wall signs as proposed. 1 • McDonald's Site and Building Plan Review October 10, 2001 Page 3 Landscaping: The landscaping plan is generally consistent with the plan previously approved. Proposed tree types include Swamp White Oak (4), Northern Pin Oak (5), Norway Compact Pine (6), Quaking Aspen (12), White Spire Birch (5) and Coralburst Crabapple (3). A wildflower wetland seed mix is proposed within the infiltration basins. Staff is recommending that the four White Spire Birch, located within the parking lot islands, be replaced with a tree type more suitable to these specific locations. The four Quaking Aspens, located in the southeast corner of the site, should be relocated to allow for the future southerly extension of the service road. Additionally, those areas scheduled for native plantings and those for sod should be delineated on the landscaping plan. Irrigation must be provided for all sodded areas. A revised landscaping plan should be submitted that incorporates these comments. Tree Preservation: Four (4) existing oak trees are proposed to be preserved as part of the site development. As a condition of site and building plan approval, a tree preservation plan should be submitted. The existing tree inventory, dated March 26, 1999 should be overlaid with the revised site and grading plan to determine if additional preservation is possible due to the site changes. Trees and shrubs identified to be saved shall be protected to the drip line from all construction traffic and storage of materials with a safety fence and depicted on the preservation plan. The tree preservation plan shall be subject to approval by the City Environmental Specialist. Grading, Drainage: A grading and drainage plan has been submitted for review. The plan is generally consistent with the plans previously approved by Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) on October 15, 1999. Minor modifications have been made due to the building/parking lot layout change. It does appear that the grading of the infiltration basins located at the northeast corner of the site and east of the service road encroach upon the proposed Apollo Drive right -of -way. All grading should be modified so that the infiltration areas are contained within the project site. Additionally, the RCWD Permit expired on April 15, 2001. As such, the revised plans need to be resubmitted for approval by the Watershed District as well as the City Engineer. Utilities: No revised utility plans were submitted. The site is proposed to be serviced from the Apollo Drive extension per the previously submitted plans dated March 26, 1999. The plans will need to be modified to reflect the new alignment of the service road and the Apollo Drive utility extension design. Design of the sanitary sewer and water utilities should be coordinated with the Apollo utility design and be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. OPTIONS 1. Recommend approval of the McDonald's site and building plan request based on the findings outlined in the October 10, 2001 planning report and subject to the conditions outlined by staff. • McDonald's Site and Building Plan Review October 10, 2001 Page 4 2. Recommend denial of the site and building plan. 3. Table the application and request more information. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the site and building plan. This recommendation is based on the findings contained in this report and subject to the conditions listed below. 1. Architectural Plans shall be provided for the trash enclosure to insure conformance with City requirements. 2. A photometric lighting plan and light fixture details shall be submitted and subject to review and approval by staff. All lighting used to illuminate off - street parking areas shall be hooded (i.e. shoe box fixtures) and arranged to deflect light away public streets and adjacent properties. 3. A revised Landscaping Plan shall be submitted subject to review and approval by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted subject to review and approval by staff prior to the commencement of site grading activities. 5. A revised grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. 6. A utility plan shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 8. All necessary permits must be obtained from Anoka County. 9. The property shall receive final plat approval prior to issuance of a building permit. A development contract shall be executed in conjunction with such approval. • SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH PARKING LOT DRAINAGE OP CUTTER our AS RE0.0 .E -7 SLOPE 3/4" per 1. 3" R 17 I 20 MODIFIED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SLOPE CUTTER TO MATCH PARKING LOT DRAINAGE 77P GUTTER OUT AS RED" 3" R 1/2" R h SLOPE 3/4" per (6. •- • l2" I 20' CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 1/4" THICK PLATE K 10' WIDE 611H 3 EXPAN. SCREWS EACH SIDE (SPACED EQUALLY) PLATE TO BE FLUSH WITH WALK. 5 5" 4 , 1/2' CARY FELT "EXPANSION JOINT "II 4- DOWNSPOUT 1/4" THICK PLATE X 10" NIDE WITH 3 EXPAN. SCREWS EACH SIDE (SPACED EQUALLY) PLATE TO BE FLUSH WITH WALK. 1/2" CARY FELT EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE SPILLWAY DETAIL 5.1.5. f / / / / / 03 Si-RUC Tio By =6't DIVE PHERS) APPIBRMl46T LOTA110N DP Ant PO ON1T. levy ammo ev ENSHCER PYLON - / SIGN / \ \ ?380 \ \ mes 5- PLAN NOTE: ALL INFORMATION SHOWN ON APOLLO DRIVE WITH RESPECT TO ALIGNMENT, ELEVATIONS, AND UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE BASED IN PART UPON A FEASIBILITY REPORT PROVIDED BY TKDA AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD0 0 tt CONSTRUCT 6" P.C.C. CURBS a GUTTERS AS PER SHEET C -1. TRANSFORMER PAD. G.C. 10 LOCATE & INSTALL TO MEET UTI0TIES COMPANY RE09040455. CONSTRUCT P.C.C. DEPRESSED RAMP AS PER SHEET C -1. INSTALL 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1CH 4' AGO. BASE. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE AS PER ARCHITECNRALS. MC 014010'5 HIGH RISE ROAD SIGN 00681E FACED ILLUMINATED DIRECTIONAL SIGN (SIGN FACE AS NOTED. SEE 540900E SCHEDULE ABOVE) BY SIGN SUPPLIER. FEN BY G.C. INSTALL MENU BOARD. INSTALL PRE SELL BOARD. INSTALL DETECTOR LOOP AS PER SHEET E -1. INSTALL 5' X 42" WROUGHT IRON RAIUNG AS ARCHIIECHTURAL'S. INSTALL METAL NAUDE LOT UGHT AS PER DETAIL SEE /3 GENERAL NOTES ABOVE & LOT UGHTING RECOMMENDATIONS BELOW. STRIPED TO MEET 9.0.A. CODE REQUIREMENTS. INSTALL 6" DIA. GUARD POST PER DETAIL PAINT HANDICAP SYMBOL - WHITE. PAINT 4• WMDE SOUD STRIPE - WHITE. PLANTING AREA SEE LANDSCAPE PUN EDGE OF CONC. PAVEMENT AT DRIVE -THRU AREA. STATE APPROVED MC. SIGN. GAS METER LOCATION FLAG POLE BY OTHERS. G.C. TO COORDINATE. SEE GENERAL NOTE /4. 4' HIGH LETTER5- 294TE PAINT TRAFFIC ARROWS-WHITE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CUSTOMER ORDER DISPLAY DIRECTIONAL SIGN SCHEDULE A ENTER 6 0065 ( ` DRIVE -THRU D THANK YOU `\/ T . NOTE: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF CURB. 2. SEE SURVEY FOR BOUNDRY DIMENSIONS, BEARINGS AND LOCATION OF BENCHMARK 3. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED. SEE SURVEY FOR EXISTING ELEVATIONS 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OUTPUT CURB AND GUTTER AS REQUIRED. AND CONDITIONS. RYAN ENGINEERING RYAN ENCI EERING.COM CNN Ene r7 • Land Planting • Environmental • Surveying Eden Prairie, MN (952) 947 -9100 I hereby certify that this pion was prepared by .,e or under my direct superition and that I am a duly registered PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws al the Slate of Minnesota. DATE REG. NO 0' 30' SCALE IN FEET 60' 90' NORTH 1. McDONALO'S ROAD 5014 AND BASE ARE BY THE 0100 CONTRACTOR. CONDUIT AND WIRING ARE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 2. BASES, ANCHOR BOLTS. CONDUIT, A010 PARING FOR ALL OTHER SIGNS ARE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR 3. 3/4" EMPTY CONDUIT TO LOCATIONS SHOWN AT THE LOT PERI- I/07ER FOR LOT UGH0NG 15 BY THE GENFJRAL CONTRACTOR. LIGHT- 150 FIXTURES, BASES. ROLES. C0140010. AND WRING ARE BY THE OWNER /OPERATOR. 4. BASES FOR FLAGPOLES ARE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ANCHOR BOLTS ARE BY 114E FLAGPOLE SUPPLIER. 5. PROPOSED U0U0ES ARE SHOWN IN SCHEMATIC ONLY EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED TO ALLOW FOR THE MOST ECONOMICAL INSTALLATION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE W1T11 ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO DETERMINE EXACT POINT 06 5ERMCE CONNECTION AT EXISTING UTILITY. REFER TO 114E 065DING ELECTRICAL ANO PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR UOUTY SERVICE ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, SIWE5, AND CIRCUITING. 7. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AT GROUNDBREAK. B. HNSH WALK AND CURB ELEVATIONS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH PAVEMENT. 9. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE ROUGH GRADED TO 6" BELOW TOP OF ALL WALKS AND CURBS FINISH GRADING. LANDSCAP515. AND SPRINKLER SYSTEMS ARE BY THE OWNER /OPERATOR. 10. LOT UGHITN0 CONCRETE FOOTINGS TO CONFORM 51TH THE SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THIS PARTICULAR SITE. 10 0 0- DESCRIPTION 0 K PAVING SPECIFICATION (MINIMUM X" TOTAL COMPACTED ASPHALT THICKNESS) CONSTRUCT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAYENENT AS S ECTFIF0 861466 PAVT.MUVT BASE SHALL BE o AGGRLGATE EASE NA7Ei4AL FOR A:.. PA.114* CONFORMING TO *5000, SECTION 3138. CLASS 5, 1005 CRUSHED (MARRY ROCK. 3" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE CONFORMING TO 914004. SECTION 2331. BITUMINOUS TACK COAT CONFORMING TO MNDOT,SECTIOJ 2357, SS -1, EMULSIFIED ASPHALT. 2" BITUMINOUS SURFACE COURSE CONFORMING TO MNDOT.SECTION 2341. WHITE TRAFFIC PAINT MEETING 'MOOT. SECTION 3569. CONSTRUCT CONOSTL PAVEMENT HET nw. AN EXTERIOR S. CONCRETE PAW. NEEDNG 4000 P.S.I. • 25 DAYS Cr ACE WIN X5 TO XX AIR ENTRAINMENT WTN X' RUMP. 20 X PO. MAXIMUM SAPOJT SCOPDINES WM CUTS CLEANED AND CROWED WIN TREMCO GROUT. NOR M0OGHAI6'S ENGINEER RESERVES THE NWT TO REQUEST A CG6ACTo5 TEST AND/OR A CORE SAMPLE. M TESTS PROVE C4RRECI. PER ASP2 SPEOFICADON. IE515 •L BE AT IRE EXPENSE Cr MNWALD.S. C.C. 0 MOMS, RILL BE WANCED. LOT LIGHTING RECOMMENDATION SECURITY UGHTINC LOT UCHT ASSEMBLIES 4581000- 1.04-09 -1.0 64TH 1000 WATT METAL MAUDE LAMPS AND 22• POLES. INCLUDING = DOUBLES. NOTE: OECTN CONDUCTOR TO ORCUIT LOT UWTWG AS NOTED. 441 INSTALL ALL PIXNRES • 3P ANGLE UNLESS NOTED OTHERS... INDICATES GLARE SHIELD AND WTERNAL DACK6WT SHIELD FULLY ENGAGED. PARKING INFORMATION TOTAL SPACES 72 33 SPACES 9' -0" X 19r -0" 0 90 • 31 SPACES 9' -5" X 18' -0" 0 90 • SPACES 9. -0" X 18' -0" 0 60 SPACES - X - 0 0 UTILITY INFORMATION SIZE TYPE LOCATION SANITARY SEWER WATER STORM SEWER ELECTRIC CAS SURVEY INFORMATION O 5 1d 8 5 5 5 5 MINNEAPOLIS REGION U 0 1650 W.82nd ST. p900 BLOOMINGTON,MN. 55431 -9888 (952)884 -4355 O 6 PREPARED BY: DATE: 7/20/98 McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES. INC. 15050 23rd AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55427 (612) 476 -6010 1.106A1 12105 SITE AREA 1.86 AC.± LEGEND SANITARY SEWER 5 S 5 WATER W W W STORM SEWER S0 ST ELECTRIC E E -5T -E OU- ST E- -G C GAS O-G LOT LIGHT C=0 LP:24 PLAN SCALE: 1" - 30' STREET ADDRESS S.E.C. CSAH 23 & APOLLO DRIVE CITY LINO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA PLAN APPROVALS a SIGNATURE (2 REQUIRED) CO —SIGN SIGNATURES 0 b 5 5 STATUS DATE BY COUNTY ANOKA CONCEPT PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ISSUED AS -BUILT REGIONAL DWG. NO MIN -14 -98 CORPORATE DWG. N0. 022 -0342 C 1 LINO.DWG Coll 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twh Clty Area 454 -0002 Mn. Toll Free 1- 800 -252 -1166 D PR SSED RAMP D TAI NOT TO SCALE LEGEND DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: • AU. CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FMSNED SURFACE/GLITTER GRADES UNLESS OTHEMMSE NOTED. • REFER TO THE SITE PVN/RECOO PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT H0M2CNTAL SITE 011404SI0NS MO LAYOUT. / / / 4, //,4��'/ / / , x / _`CISEAENT / / / / 1 / • F1U.D VERIFY E7SS1ING CONTOUR ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION I ND NOTIFY 1E ENGINEER AND MCDONALD'S OF ANY DISCREPANCLS ON VARIATIONS • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VFRFY THE LOCATION AND CIVADON OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WTI THE DINERS MO FIELD-WWI' PRIOR TO CCNSTRUCTOI. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MKDA1ELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. • AU. CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES • POSITIVE ORANA(.E FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL 1MES. • SLOPE CUTTER ON CURB TO MATCH ADJACENT PAW NE NT GRADE. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: • ALL SET FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE N- PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION A4D SMALL BE MNNTANED UNTL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTNG SLT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTANED AND OR REMOVED ND STALL BE CONSIDERED INODQNTAL TO 114E GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF DCTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FED CONDTIONS Y4114 RESPECT TO EROSION OCNTROL TEMPORARY PONDNC. OWES HAIBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. • ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WOKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE ENO OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO "RE STE MUST BE PROMDED TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS SLT FENCE AND pI / `1 UARY DIKE PLAN Np'FE: NFORMATION SHOMN ON APOLLO DRIVE WITH RESPECT TO ALIGNMENT. AID UTSJTY LOCATIONS ARE BASED N PART UPON A FEASIBMJTY REPORT PROVOED BY TOM APO ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 1019 NOCK 0015119:1011 e171W0 SOMAS ec A MPM1M /LOT 1 NO COMM/ MAMA NW E0147 a NI. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 11110017 Net TQ !MAC NAIL SOL 10E-IN TRENCH FOR DISIROFE9CE NOTE: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS 10 FACE OF CURB. 2. SEE SURVEY KR DOUNDRY DIMENSIONS. BEARINGS AND LOCATION OF BENCHMARK 3. ALL ELEVATICH4 STIOVN ARE PROPOSED. SEE SURVEY FOR EXISTING ELEVATIONS 4E7000 2 P1•m i1* 411114• sill 1154 AM .1 be MAN M M•7n M M m114/00 MINANI Am Mt M M 115 0/MM Amy Ow 7m IMO N P••1*.• W palm 4164 N MO MM a 1. 1494 2 Ow • M MyAI. AM.m. r *Mr M.J. w OIn w Mew TAI• ti mend wai. Ha./M6)w IMMNM MM. M 0.044041 r SMm "my 1 41 Iv VAN• l• of /00•400114 w4M1 /Mk I.• 10 MMr. 1. 1511 MN MA Mw NOM r.W mr0.0. SILT FENCE DIVERSIONARY DIKE 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OUTPUT CURB AND GUTTER AS RECLINED. AND COMMONS. 1 � / 1 1 1 1 1 9db / / / 1 /' / / / / / / RYAN IIVANENCI•1111040.COM (1621 1474700 0,4,K47 sTIFF anM11U•1 1 w • i*Ybr� MM1 `PRO[74d1M Pi•L Nvlmt A.M. M M• M M. MAW N 11nm4•. DATE REG NO 0' 30' SCALE IN FEET 60' 90' NORTH GENERAL NOTES 1. I*OL.Lr6 ROM NMI AW OAK NE •1 THE NMI ONIIMC70. 9010U17 AM YRM O AK W 44 KNOW 0311RIC70R. 2 1403. NOVA ROTS CORWt AIO IMO roll ALL 0143t SOB ANC N 14 GOERIL 0011I1A471I. 3. 3/4 1*WIV COOMT 10 LOCAT011 UMW AT M LOr 01011- 141E1 MAIM 001110 M AY 114 00104E COT/141M LENT- 110 WILL MAL PIMA CO/MMT. M1* MIMI PM NY TIE OwRA0110410R 4. 0010 *10 RAOMD 0* IT SE M010*4. 004111A:IOM. 01010 7017 ARE 71 THE RAVOIL LUNDL N. 111070® 1017% ME 0001 N 00I041IC OLX DUCT UW41016 NAIL R OE10Yr® A ALLOW NON THE MOOT 0)0141102 MTALLA101. N. THE OO ORAC?OR SINE OOOF4001 MTN All 01111 COMMIES W OC6ILSK 0000 PONT OF KIWI 001111121101 AT MINN MIA. PoY 19 44 LLCM 01i9RICAl AMO P UMMR ORA1NOI PE MUM WICK M1ON1CK LO ATMN• RSA MO 010110.1. ALL 4.14,1440 4101 406 M M IXINCC 10 11K 160/41* MD MKT OE NORM EY 14 001164L COWNI TCR AT MW IMZAK • .MIN WALK MO MUM •.LW00M NAIL E r AIM /MN MMYa1T. • ALL MAINOCAPE ALAI 1401 ■ 10101 COMM 0 4 Num 001 OF 411 MA(7 MO CURL IMMM 101014 LAMMA/1p, AM MIIMO•N1 SWIM AIM R1 14 0•111/11P¢A10R 10 ICI 151111* O1IKNEM !001407 10 4014101 MN 1K SOLI FAVORS IKOOMOOMM4 NUR TIE P4104A4 I L 4. m PAVING SPECIFICATION (AW4OI r ICTM CCMPA NCO Ar11MT 114CAOO6) C0470.47 4PI01.7 Ma0M1t elilac_4aSOBOLWaL PAMMMR MAR MILL 40 r AADMR&4. HATE IMT•aLL PM ILL PAIR 0014011* 70 1607. LOKI 310 CLAN S 100E CMMW NWMR18004 r O4MM1*1M am COME comm.: A 1100 71011 23e. * NAMMI TAO( CM mm••••C 10 MPROS=C1RM 717. 35-11,, 0111131110 NIPAILT. r 4fUIM1eil4 1*ME coma C0I'4M11* 10 40401409104 711. MIK 1460% MMT YH1I1 MRCS 14111 3110 1.11401 mein PAmo1 ALLIIIIILJOAL ormwr- 414.4 Mt WO r P.14. • 14110440 wMi1•i Y 441MM4 VIM 1' 4.4* V • - MAArN 0*11 ammo MM am OM NI AIM 00440 IPM MOO MM. MM •OMA SI M N MMIMI Y MY 1107 A YMMIM OP A.MAs A.MM •A•0 • UM Mt ••111415 704 NMM MMMT1MMt IOM Wet M Y aM M MAUNA% AwaE M ML IL *411140. LOT 0QITIN0 RECOMMENDATION =UNITY LICHT74Q LOT Wig AMERBl1E3 A0SI000- LM4 -0I-M1 NTH 1000 WATT METAL HAL1E LAMPS MO 22' POLES. Nuu0N0 _- 00.11417. MNO 4.40* atoms 10 NNW WI IMM.• Y MMMM WAIL MA MAO OM MOM MAN MOW 140* /MAO 4MM Ma AIM 4111 Ma1MR 710 NAY MAIM PARKING NFORMATION TOT 72 37 •••• r-G' • 17• -0' • 30 • 31 1'ACK7 r -Or 2 N•-a• • 00 • 0 r -cr ■ le_a• • so • /PACCX - K - • a UTILITY INFORMATION SZE TYPE LOCATION 0AM1ARY 7('101 10011 SLIM LIAR OAS SURVEY NFORMATION PRVARD 0Y: M000ABS mow R00S A000OA1E3 NC. 15070 23rd MOLE NO R111 PLYMWM IN 06427 (612) 470 -0040 MITw 12100 SATS T2a/W SITE AREA 1.86 AC.t LEGEND WORMY KIM O 1 it 0 IMO IA IN Y M - 60RM 1E00 - 7T- lT -n -1I- SLECTRIC - -E -{ {-S- GAa •� LOT LINT G1.421 V:14 PLAN SCAM I' - 30' STREET ADDRESS S.E.C. CSAH 23 & APOLLO DRIVE CITY LINO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA V 5 1 1 1 M STATUS DATE BY COUNTY ANOKA CONCEPT PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN ISSUED AS -BUILT REGIONAL DWG. NO MIN -14 -98 CORPORATE DIG. N0. 022-0342 C- U NO - 1 .17WC 4. • NOTES• - LIWeLOR LLMPIPUR 413.E leery HL ENTENTES 1M201 1.447 EAELT 113 WORK 554rAG1 LOCA. UTILITY GGAPARES rat MGT LLCATO - LMPIPPE GLMRAC. ell 9131. LICRDNATC 166 WORM WITH OTTERS AT 9TE MD GAMRtre els WARR PER OAMeRs 6T9 T1LN SGJC5L1. - AL RANT ANTERVLS 8134. CG NXIARANTELD LTe 1C0 rU3. YEAR 1PO9 TOTAL GGATLrILN ATP AGLEPTA/L'C DY' 044E4. WPM OE TAC R PUILISONT Ar AiPRCPRIATE TM GR WON Rr11E5T a OMER - REPLAGI%.ENT TLPSOL MULL IC 0.ENL FREE a SUMS. WADS, MD OPER LILCSRARL MIRK - PLAMTND SOL MK (NGGONTA. COST REM L MR I L0 5 -10-10 LQArR 43 PTRTLimt P64 GU W. TGPSOL t. T1Y.RADNLY MW 1-PORT SOAP MD 1-PART FEAT MOSS WITH 3 -PARTS PERM= AND TA, SOLO - USE PLAMM& 50L AT AL LOCATIONS PER 1ETALS THIS 9@T. - L3PSrIPE aMRIY.rat 9VLL VERPY T03OL RPM NP sorry awe: or *ft DEPICE GY. - SCA 9VLL CE CU-TIRED 11TH PREWANATLY XENTLX2W 53f3RASS sees 0 woe muse RE516T45Ir NrR5414l91F N0 61WEANTS LN SW exam' ANY 5LD Nor SATIYAGTGRY AT The a COWLETISIN IISPELT7GN 9131 CE PROMPTLY REPLACED PRIOR TO CAPUTO& a xis 6TA4e SW GN 9LPCS 31 ALP WEATPR - mew L9057M ccrearTE/ ASPI'NLT AREAS ALE r0 DE RLPLACEP WITH LAWS44PP5. PRPA9OI5 FCLLD EC WHEN r0 eLPPVI44TE CITCMATION a 9DF•OL TO API M a 2' WITH MADN& GGNTRAGTOR WANE WTI GGAPAOTED 7OP6011• ALL ARP-16 r0 to L1447%1.N1® MD SCG EP 911 IC CRAVED 9.W71 MD EWE - tAW11LAPE LARRALfGR 9 RG5PGN5alt PGR SROND 64. 44346 MWI APL NBTt53 b'T GLNSTRIZTCN MUMS AL ROW. MD 4000:10 PP6PERTES 11464161l4 tail, tit TO ,mrkl. VALLEY VOW'. •EWAG1l 044040- If17b1Nb AWED AL PLINTH& 7X96 AS NOTED LW HIS PEA1 - USE sum 'Ybpgsrons oom TPPDACCP DI" MLOt mixt. 4' perm NO FLIER r4s Re Ot ELMAt9 AROHD AL TREES LOCATED GUTSCE 9V11D ceps - 6RAVG. MICH FALL DE 5 / {h DM. RATA RUSK.. INSTAL A' R 111 MTH APPROVED N® PAVRIG DARKER r RE3ERaWED GN TT15 PLAN Iaoscof_ LIMIf9553 5 ResPaarlt rat MaM791 SYSTEM mom MP 445rA14T04 A6 MAY DE TEQJpE9 DV M CRY•. OWN 9133. CE APPROVED DY OMER PRIOR TO N SrALLAr91 RREATID AREAS 9LQle 54C0PAPS ALL PROPOSED UMPSCAPE AREAS 1MT1151 PROPERTY L4CS 4413,65553 a SGP MO/ GR FLAMNSS WEfP 994 MSTAIATIOI a AL PVC. SLEEVE USER LRAC AREAS PATH coot& 604119 LTO3 - L. G_ 2 6LM1M0411t MALL CLEAR AL PAH.e.r WAS DATER Al. LOWSL4PE N5rsL4r0CN 9 CQFLLTE MP ACCEPTED DY 09ER 50916. L91l9 At TO WEEP PAYMENT AREAS MGR TO TUN OITR TO Meet / / / 4 rNGRTFQal PN LWt EXISTING 19 OAK / / / / / TEMPO" ACCESS //�� - EASEMENT / PYLON SIGN EC p TE Lat - - rHVL RSI f.M r'I &f$R wtDRLOhrR SCUM) SEW MD ,M PN • w_ ' _ Sr46 PLANT MATERIAL WY WE ROOT LGAAIGN NOME TYPE carmen, NAM: 4 Ls LA.. 668 ONMP WHITE O A Qu•rcue bicolor S TT VI M8 NORnrRN PIN OAK Quaraus ellipsoidal's i tit fkb NORWAY GliAPAGt PIC Pious reelnoso Norway Convect' Is L L. M8 ASPEN Pop uI us trwluloides 5 IVs GA_ C/8 WIVE 9'13 PRO 11e1910 platyphyl le Japonica WhitespIre S I$ GC C b GLRAARST GRA+PPLL Malta Coralcoli 111 t4' 6PR POT FRA1 5 80R FUSTRIP 911175 ROSE - 17 >! Hf. POT COMPACT CAMP:PRY 114.141 Vibe,nue trl lobun bpi ley Compact• 91 T4' Hr, POT T'RA T 9AMT Rhos prompt Ica D K 941l POT CUE STAR LIMPER Juniperu• .quomolo blue titer Mar WP. CLOW4 A/MN11 S0., elr.WtL PALM FLIER PAM& I }SMITE SPIRE MLA L NSW 7 (.IRAN* ASPEN 0' SCALE IN FEET 30' THE PL0NTINE4 PETAL NOT TO S%At 60' 90' NORTH IlNSI'TES 17111 OIAI !<l� elate t\ rLyt.•stb M In he 1119.411./9011 I hereby certify that this plan, specilicatlon, or report Was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. and that 1 so o duly licensed Landscape Architect under the lows of the State of Minnesoto. pale Reba 499 $laned Robert Mueller McDONALD'S ROAD SIGN AND BASE ARE BY THE SIGN CONTRACTOR. CONDUIT AND WIRING ARE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. BASES, ANCHOR BOLTS, CONDUIT, AND HIRING FOR ALL OTHER SIGNS ARE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTER. 3. 3/4' EMPTY CONDUIT TO LOCATIONS SNONN AT THE LOT PERI- METER FOR LOT UGHnNG 15 BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. UGHT- ING 878106E5. BASES, POLES. CONDUIT, AND WIRING ARE BY THE OWNER /OPERATOR. BASES FOR FLAGPOLES ARE BY ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ANCHOR BOLTS ARE BY THE FLAGPOLE SUPPUER. 5. PROPOSED UIRJTE5 ARE SHOWN IN SCHEMATIC ONLY. EXACT LOCATIONS SHAU BE DETERMINED TO ALLOW FOR THE MOST ECONOMICAL INSTALLATION. 6. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTUTY COMPANIES TO DETERMINE EXACT POINT OF SEANCE CONNECTION AT EXISTING UTEJTY. REFER TO THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL AN0 PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR UTUTY SERVICE ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, SIZES, AND CIRCUITING. ALL EEVATOIS SHOWN ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AT CROUNDBREAK. 8. FINISH WALK AND CURB ELEVATIONS SHALL BE 8' ABOVE FINISH PAVEMENT. 9. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE ROUGH GRADED TO 6' BELOW TOP OF ALL WALKS AND CURBS. FINISH GRADING, LANDSCAPING. AND SPRNKIER SYSTEMS ARE BY THE OWNER /OPERATOR. 10. LOT UGHITNG CONCRETE FOOTINGS TO CONFORM 019 THE 501L5 REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THIS PARTICULAR SITE. DESCRIPTION 17 a PAVING SPECIFICATION (M1N1MUM X' TOTAL COMPACTED ASPHALT THICKNESS) CONSTRUCT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVES w PAVEMENT BASE SHALL BE 6• AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL FOR ALL PAVING CONFORMING TO *ROOT. SEC1ON 343e. CLASS 5. 100% CRUSHED WAIRRY ROCK. 3' BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE CONFORMING TO MNDOT, SECTION 2331. BITUMINOUS TACK.COAT CONFORMING TO MNDOT,SECT1011 2357, 55 -1, EMULSIFIED ASPHALT. 2' BITUMINOUS SURFACE COURSE CONFORMING TO *500T,SECTION 2341. NOTE TRAFFIC PAINT MEE1NG MNOOT, 5ECn0N 3568. ONSIROCF ATE PAWSIEXT EX CRETE PATTING MEETING 4000 P.S.I. 0 26 OATS 07 ACE 01N VT TO XX CLAR ENTRAINMENT WIN A. SLUMP. SV X 10 NWU SAWCDT SCORURNEI NTH 6175 EANED AND GROUTED MM DI O CAME.wA NOTE: M51008 8D.IONIER RESERVES TIE WAIT TO REQUEST A 1468 CONPACTION AND /GI1 A CORE SAMPLE IF TESTS PROVE CORRECT. PER ABMS SPECIFICATION, TESTS NU BE AT TOE EVEN% O McDONNALO'S OTOERwBE. nn NU. BE 00ROED. LOT LIGHTING RECOMMENDATION SECURITY UCHTINC LOT UQ1T ASSEMBUES AS81000- MH -09 -14T WITH 1000 WATT METAL HAUDE LAMPS AND 22' POLES. INCLUDING = DOUBLES. NOTE: E901850 . CONTRACTOR TO 080.81 LOT *041180 AS NO1m. NSTA11. ALL FIXTURES 0 30' ANGLE UNLESS NOTED O NERNSE. •• 889015S GLARE SHIELD ANO INTERNAL BACYUGNT 5wF1D HALT ENGAGED. PARKING INFORMATION TOTAL SPACES 72 33 SPACES 9'_o• X tg•_p• 0 gp • 31 SPACES 9M_0• X 1B•_0• 0 90 • SPACES 9•-0• X la•_0' 0 BO • SPACES - X - e p • UTUTY INFORMATION SIZE TYPE LOCATION SANITARY SEWER WATER STORM SEWER ELECTRIC CAS SURVEY INFORMATION 0J) a U 0 a 1650 W.82nd ST. 000 BLOOMINGTON,MN. 55431 -9888 (952)884 -4355 N C LLI PREPARED BY: DATE: 7/20/9a McCOUBS FRANK R00S ASSOCIATES. INC. 15050 23•d AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55427 (612) 478 -6010 9784/ 12105 SITE AREA 1.86 AC.± LEGEND SANITARY SEWER S S WATERS S STORM SEWER - ST- ST- ST -ST- ELECTRIC - E- E -E -E- C C GASr�.__R�C LOT UCHT C=0 LP: 24 PLAN SCALE. 1• - 30' STREET ADDRESS S.E.C. CSAH 23 Sc APOLLO DRIVE CITY LINO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA PLAN APPROVALS 17 0 SIGNATURE (2 REQUIRED) 5 a 5 d 5 N STATUS DATE BY COUNTY ANOKA CONCEPT PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN ISSUED AS -BUILT REGIONAL DWG. NO MIN -14 -98 CORPORATE DWG. NO. 022 -0342 C- 4 LINO.DWG • • • T /ARCH ELEV. • 25'-0' T /H70P ELEV. • 16' -10' 1::D /SOIT I T ELEV. • 10'-4' T /HINDOfi ELEV. • W-0' T /SLAB ELEV. • 0'-0' qc 7/MECH. ELEV. • 16' -II 7/PARAPET ELEV. • I5' -11 T/PIAI NSOOT ELEV. • 2'-6' 4 7/MECH. SCREEN PENCE ELEV. • 16' -11' T/PARAPET ELEV. + 15' -11' GALVANIZED METAL SCUPPER O 1 t N6 (TYPICAL) $7/SILL E.PV. • 5'-0' A3 O RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION I/4 " =I' -0" XA -4319 0 TYP. I '9 ELEV. H • 25' O' T /ROOF E.LV. • 16' -10 5/SOFFIT ELEV. • 10' -4' T/W 1 NDOICi EL EV. • q'-O' ELEV. EV. • 2' -6' 7/SLAB I3E'/. • 0' -O' KEY J NorrEss AMDa_AP 2 ORORE VPIe YN IR . Lsr.r Wi JN MI4 TTILe n CA,x? /A J AP GO 4�i4 7 E 6 Teed SAPCTY CLASS. Nc0CNALD'S SI6NA/E EY OTTER - 1 COORDINATION DC MCDONALD'S PRO.dT M4U6pt 0 a 0 O2 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION I/4 " =1' -0" XA -4319 1' C12M INSU.. SLAS6 SET IN AM NNW. ALUM. THERMAL BREAK HMS PRASE. PIPE BOLLARD. Sts 'SD' MISTS. SS NOTES ON SHEET AI. S'• PIPE DOLLNO WARPS. I1Mm 1'-4' MINIMl11 INTO CCIKAETE POOTINO PILL BOX. SEE NOTES ON SILT AI. 0 a TAT. CONTROL JOINTS. SEE DETAIL 7 /AIO. STAINLESS s1ES. FASCIA BAD WITH NEON TUDAIND 7� 1NTSRIOR 1LLit�0llM8TET N H DOUDL!' PAC8 NNCID M ' • PTPL' C&U1i'16 -PPAINTID (11ID) 6�. srAU ..__ 4 0 0 I'IITm PREPINISNED METAL SCAR PeK,E PAINT TO MATCH STUCCO OR Pet DIRECTION OP P P0A D' S PROJECT KAMME R (4) 4'1. STQ.. PIPE SISN mores w HIM NOSH. (2) 2' STta_ PIPE KICKERS ArrAcrey • SOTM ARCH LOCATION, PAINT PER FINAL COLOR SELECTION BY 1HGDON LD'S PIaECT HANAoeR RECEIVED OCT 0 1 2001 6' x B. HIGH *LOSS TILE M/ ALTERNATIN• COLORS FIRST COLOR • *RACE TO BE MHITE 'N MMMMMM ■MMt9N1K1A_ I INN MMMMMMM MMMMM■ A VIM MMMMMMMMMMI CDTILE RETAIL 1 /2 " =I -0" 2- 5' H. 6. RED 2- 5' H. 6. WHITE 2- 5' H. 6. RED 2- 5' H. 6. PHITE XA -4319 0 022 -0342 • a 0 0 KEY NOTES t ANO LA�2�EM G Br PW' �Y1TENNµASC! NIMI ISLO'A TIE[. I AIL VA Pat PA1 �1 DENOTES TEMPERED SAFETY &ASS. MGODIMLD'S 51SNME BY OTE R& - COOMDINATIOM BY WJX8O D'S PRT.C.T MANAGER 61' -1 1/4. 26'I -4' AA 0 0 y FRONT ELEVATION 1/4 " =1' -0 XA -4319 T /ARCH ELEV. +251-0' T /ROOF ELEV. .16' -10' 0 0 CD REAR ELEVATION 1/4 " =1' -0" XA -4319 D /9OPYIT ELEV. *10' -4' g: T /WINDOW ELEV. *q'-O' T /WAINSCOT LEY. *2' -6' ELEV. *O' -O' T /ARCH ELEV. .251-0' T/MECH. SCREEN ELEV. *16' -11' T /ROOF ELEV. *16' -10' T /PARAPET ELEV. 15' -11' D /SOPP±T ELEV. 10' -4' g: T /NI NOON ELEV. .41-0' T /TNI NSGOT ELEV. .2'-6' T /SLAB H..EV. .O' -0' RECEIVED OCT 0 1 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 0 0 0 0 1' CLEAR INIIL. SLABS SET IN AN MOD. ALUM. T 'TRIM. BREAK MIIDOM PRANG. PIP! BOLLARD. S6'. 40' SWEETS. SG' NOTES ON SHEET AI. 5'0 PIPE BOLLARD MINDS. IMBED 1'-4• MINIMUM INTO CONCRETE POTTINS PILL BON. SS NOT% ON SHEET At. a 0 0 M. COMM JOINTS. /% DETAIL T /AID. STAINLESS STEEL FASCIA BAND NtTM NOON TUSINS IMgIOt ILWMINATS hWN IXUA.t I S FALS /' S PIPE COLUMNS - PAINTED D((( 9))T 101 DETAILS ON AB 1'CR ADDITION*. INFO. 0 0 FLUTED PREPINISHm DOTAL SCREEN FENCE PAINT TO MATCH SNOW OR PLR DIRECTION O' MoDONALD' 1 PRO-MT N VIASOR (4) 44, /T'S FIR SION FRAMS W MIRE MESH. (2) 2' STEEL PIPE KICKOlS ATTACHE BOTH ANKH LOCATIONS. PAINT PER FINAL COLOR seLECTIQN ET HCDONALD'S PRO-MT MANAMA 022 -0542 A2 ELEVATIONS