Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/10/2002 P&Z Packet• AGENDA • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 13, 2002 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING, Bald Eagle Contractors, Lake Drive, CUP for Outdoor Storage, Jeff Smyser B. PUBLIC HEARING, Stoneybrook, Comprehensive Plan Amendment/MUSA Allocation, Rezone, Preliminary Plat, Mike Grochala VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. NONE VII. ADJOURN • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD DRAFT MINUTES DATE : March 13, 2002 TIME STARTED : 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED : 7:03 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Corson, Hyden, Lane, Lyden, Schaps, and Zych MEMBERS ABSENT : Rafferty STAFF PRESENT : City Planner Smyser; Tanda Gretz I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planninggand Z• _ Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., March 13, 2002. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF MINU ruary 13, 2002 Mr. Corson made a MOTION o approve the minutes of the February 13, 2002, meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board, and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared open mike open at 6:33 p.m. No one was present for open mike. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:34 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5 -0. • V. ACTION ITEMS A. Outlot F, Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition, Minor Subdivision Staff presented the application by Gor -Em Builders, LLC for a Minor Subdivision. • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 13, 2002 Page 2 Staff reviewed the background of the lot by explaining Outlot F, measuring 10 X 300 feet, was originally platted as a pedestrian trail easement, connecting Clearwater Creek Drive to LaCasse Drive, but not providing connection to any other system of trails. The reason for the trail was to provide pedestrian access across the subdivision, since a block of excessive length (1,700 feet) was created when a block in the 3`d addition was added to an existing block in the 2nd addition. Staff explained the trail had not yet been constructed in August 2000, when it came to the attention of the City Council Work Session Meeting of August 23, 2000, via Mr. Petronick, of 6601 LaCasse Drive. Mr. Petronick expressed a number of reservations about the placement of a trail next to his home, plans for which he was unaware of when he purchased his property. It was reported that "neighbors are also opposed to the trail." After consideration, "council directed staff to proceed with vacating the trail easement," according to the minutes for the September 6, 2000 City Council Work Session Staff presented its analysis by explaining the City never . ctually owned or was dedicated Outlot F, according to the Final Plat dedication pag`:r water Creek 3rd Addition, which stated: "...and do hereby donate and d the circle, courts, drives, lane, roa drainage and utility purpos Outlot F was unique from other 0 drainage and utility easements ov dedicated to the City. Since the 0 City, and the proposed tra Builders. Gor -Em had the trail not be required. the public use forever ark and easements for with the subdivision in that it did not have As a r'ult, it was never part of the property ever part of the property dedicated to the tistructed, the Outlot was still owned by Gor -Em usly to pay the City $1,000 should construction of What was further needed, however, was a Minor Subdivision, dividing Outlot F in two along the boundary lines of lots 1 & 14, block 3, Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition. The resulting two 150' X 10' pieces would then be attached to lots 1 & 14. Such action would: 1. Prevent the Outlot from becoming a useless piece of land, and thus going Tax Forfeit. 2. Resolve the trail issue. Staff had assumed that the above described two pieces should be attached to the two lots south of the Outlot, rather that be divided among all four of the neighboring lots (two to the north, and two to the south). This was because the Outlot and the two adjacent properties to the south lie within Addition #3, while the two lots to the north lie within Addition #2. Staff indicated even though it was originally Mr. Petronack who brought the situation to the attention of the council, it did not seem appropriate to attach the resulting Outlot F land to his property, since his property was located in Addition #2 and the Outlot was located in Addition #3. A conversation on March 4`h with Deb Petronack confirmed that such an arrangement meets with the approval of the Petronacks. • • Planning & Zoning Board March 13, 2002 Page 3 Staff stated Outlot F appeared physically indistinguishable from the adjacent properties; it had been sodded and taken care of by the neighboring residents and visually blended into their lawns. Staff indicated the four property owners adjacent to Outlot F had all been notified of this meeting, although it was not required that Public Notice be given in the matter of a Minor Subdivision. The two affected property owners (lots 1 & 14, block 3, Addition #3) had each agreed to accept the resulting 10 X 150 -foot property, which would be deeded to them from Gor -Em builders, pending approval of this Minor Subdivision. Staff recommended approving the minor subdivision with the conditions as listed. 1. Gor -Em Builders will pay the City $1,000, in lieu of having to construct the trail. 2. Gor -Em will deed over the two subject pieces to the adjacent two property owners to the south for the nominal sum of $1.00. 3. Residents at 6599 LaCasse Drive and 6596 Clearws r Creek Drive must legally combine the resulting 10' X 150' piece with theirs *exi Property Identification Number (PIN). property under a single Chair Schaps asked if the City had received any in from any of the residents either for or against this Ms. Gretz replied there ha y- no ments received Mr. Corson made a MOTION to a Clearwater Creed 3rd Addition 1. Gor -Em Builders will e they equest of Gor -Em Builders, LLC, Outlot F, bdivi on, subject to the following conditions: ,000, in lieu of having to construct the trail. 2. Gor -Em will deed over . two subject pieces to the adjacent two property owners to the south for the nominal s of $1.00 3. Residents at 6599 LaCasse Drive and 6596 Clearwater Creek Drive must legally combine the resulting 10' X 150' piece with their existing property under a single Property Identification Number (PIN). The motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Pheasant Hills 12th, EAW Petition Staff explained the City had received a petition requesting the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Pheasant Hills 12th Addition project. The petitioners submitted their petition to the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB), which forwarded it to the City. This process complied with State requirements. • Planning & Zoning Board March 13, 2002 Page 4 The petition requested that the EQB act as the responsible governmental unit for the EAW. In accordance with the rules, the EQB decided which governmental unit had the greatest responsibility for supervising or approving the project as a whole. In this case, it was the City, and so the EQB forwarded the petition to staff. Staff indicated no final decision could be made on the project until: a) the City decided no EAW was needed, or; b) the City decided an EAW was needed, and afterward decided no environmental impact statement was needed. Staff stated the City needed to decide if an EAW should be prepared. If, because of the nature or location of the project, it may have the potential for significant environmental effects, an EAW should be prepared. If the City did not think there may be the potential for significant environmental effects, it should deny the petition. Staff indicated the decision on preparing an EAW must include written findings. Mr. Smyser indicated the trees cleared out of the islan staff will send out a letter tomorrow stating that no EAW was prepared. ould not have happened and vity could be done until the Mr. Corson stated he was listed on the petition. H asked what indicated Mr. Vaughan could not clear trees on the property. Mr. er reed there was not anything in city ordinances specifically that said that a prop • er could not cut trees, but because the owner had submitted a developme could do. However, he indicate need to be looked at in the future. project should be occurri this changed the context of what an owner vague and it was something that would e, because of the EAW issue, no work on the Mr. Lyden asked for an expo • of exemptions under residential development. Mr. Smyser explained what the ex - ptions were. Mr. Lyden asked who paid for the EAW. Mr. Smyser replied the developer paid for it whether it was mandatory or discretionary. Mr. Lyden stated if the City wanted the EAW done, the City should pay for it. He suggested the City buy the island for the public good. Mr. Smyser replied he would convey Mr. Lyden's recommendation to the City Council. B. Development Review Task Force Update Mr. Smyser stated they have been holding monthly meetings on the third Thursday of every month. He indicated the Task Force was addressing the subdivision ordinance that regulated the division of land. He stated the Task Force would soon be addressing elements of the zoning ordinance as well. C. 2001 Planning & Zoning Board Action Update • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 13, 2002 Page 5 Mr. Smyser indicated he had handed out to the Board chronological actions taken by the Board in 2001. The second list was the same items itemized by category. D. E- mailing of Minutes Mr. Smyser stated the Board would be receiving e-mails of approved P &Z Minutes as well as copies of the approved Minutes of the other Boards. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Corson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:03 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • AGENDA ITEM V. A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: April 10, 2002 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit Application for Outdoor Storage in LI Zoning District 72xx Lake Drive BACKGROUND Dave Biese of Bald Eagle Construction has submitting and application for a conditional use permit (CUP) for outdoor storage. He wishes to move his construction business to the site and store vehicles outdoors, such as trucks and a construction trailer. The current application does not include a site plan review. Typically, a CUP application such as this would be accompanied by complete site plan information. Our understanding is that the applicant wanted to find out if the outdoor storage was possible before committing to designing the building, grading, utilities, and other elements. ANALYSIS The site consists of two parcels totaling approximately 1.3 acres. Outdoor Storage Requirements: The City Council adopted Ordinance 02 -2000 in February 2000. (see attachment) This amendment to the zoning ordinance establishes open and outdoor storage as a conditional use in the Light Industrial zoning district. (Sec. 8 Subd. 1.I.1) It also lists very specific limitations regarding where such storage is allowed. • Comprehensive Plan (existing) Comprehensive Plan (2001 draft) Zoning site Light Indus. Industrial LI Light Indus. north Light Indus. Industrial LI Light Indus. east Multiple Family Resid. PSP Public /Semi - Public R -3 Resid. west Light Indus. Industrial PSP Public Semi - Public south Light Indus. _ Industrial LI Light Indus. Outdoor Storage Requirements: The City Council adopted Ordinance 02 -2000 in February 2000. (see attachment) This amendment to the zoning ordinance establishes open and outdoor storage as a conditional use in the Light Industrial zoning district. (Sec. 8 Subd. 1.I.1) It also lists very specific limitations regarding where such storage is allowed. • • • • Several requirements pertain to the design of the site. We do not have specific design information necessary to judge if the application complies with all the ordinance requirements, such as those for lighting and parking. • We can address the locational requirements now. The ordinance states that the property cannot abut property zoned residential, rural, or business. Abutting includes across a street. The subject site is directly across the street from an R -3 zoning district. The intent of the ordinance is to allow outdoor storage only on light industrial sites that are internal to the zoning district. That is, the sites are not to be on the edges of an LI zoning district, but toward the inside of the district. That way, the storage sites will always be screened not only by onsite design features, but also by other industrial properties. The proposed site is exactly the type of location prohibited by the outdoor storage ordinance. • The ordinance states that the actual outdoor storage area cannot abut a school or park. The property abuts a stormwater pond on school property, but the submitted sketch shows a fenced area for storage which does not abut the school property. An area with "grass seed" is shown separating the two. In fact, the seeded area appears to cover over half the entire site, according to the drawing, rendering it unusable. It is probable that once the business and storage are established, a successful construction business will grow and need additional storage area for equipment. Contractor yards typically accumulate more and more equipment and material over time. That is, because of the type of business Bald Eagle is in, it will be difficult to keep fully one half of the site unusable. Even assuming the property owner properly requests expansion of the storage, the City will have created for itself a difficult situation where an intended buffer is threatened. We note that the school district has sent a letter stating it does not oppose the application for outdoor storage. While we appreciate the district's input, it does not erase City staff's concerns. Standard Conditional Use Permit Requirements: Most types of conditional uses listed in the zoning ordinance have specific conditions, such as those discussed above. In addition, there are general requirements that apply to all CUPs. (Sec. 2 Subd. 2.B.7) One of these is that the proposed use "will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use." As explained above, the property abuts a residential zoning district. This would not conform to the specific standard of the zoning ordinance that prohibits outdoor storage on such a site. • • • Full site and building plans are required for CUP applications. We received only sparse information in the submittal. We received grading, utility, and landscaping plans on April 3. This did not allow for a complete site plan review for the P & Z meeting. However, as a courtesy to the applicant we have reviewed the CUP application without the site and building plans. As stated above, our understanding is that the applicant wanted to find out if the outdoor storage was possible before committing to designing the building, grading, utilities, and other elements. Since the proposal clearly does not comply with outdoor storage requirements, staff is comfortable making a recommendation on the storage CUP alone. This report does not include a site and building plan review or recommendation. Any such application must include complete submittal information and be reviewed according to the City's deadline and meeting schedule. Surrounding Nonconforming Uses: Properties on the north and south of the subject site have outdoor storage. These are nonconforming uses. This means that the uses existed prior to the change in zoning requirements that would prohibit such uses. They have a right to continue as they were before the change. However, the City is not obligated to nor should it allow new uses that do not comply with its ordinances. OPTIONS 1. Deny the CUP application because it does not comply with City requirements, as explained in the staff report. 2. Approve the CUP application. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 This report is based on the following submittals: • "Site Plan", 3/6/02, received 3/8/02 (one vellum sheet, no copies submitted) • letter from John Christiansen, Centennial Schools, received 3/8/02 • fax letter from Shingobee Builders, received 3/12/02 • Application form, received 3/8/02 /4#47e-A�r� ?` / Council Member Carlson introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 02 - 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING OPEN AND OUTDOOR STORAGE AS AN ACCESSORY USE WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN THE LIGHT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) ZONING DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Section 8, Subd. I. 1 of the City Zoning Ordinance LI, (Light Industrial Zoning District) is hereby amended to add the following: 1. Open and outdoor storage as an accessory use provided that: a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring uses, residential zoning districts and public rights -of -way per Sec. 3, Subd. 4.S of the Zoning Ordinance. The storage area shall be screened 100% from residential properties. b. Storage area is fenced in a manner approved by the City. c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the City Council. d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.H. of this Ordinance or other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this Ordinance and not in front yards. f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, including land in a neighboring city, "Abutting" includes across a street. "Abutting" does not include properties that touch only corner -to- corner. g. The property shall not abut I -35W or I -35E. h. The storage area shall not abut a school or a public park. i. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. j. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED by the Lino Lakes City Council this 28th Day of February, 2000. i y Jidhn Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ry- hel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Dahl and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell The following voted against same: Whereupon said Ordinance was duly passed and adopted. • MRR. 1. euue 4: 11=VM SH1NVUtiLL 8UlLUL.R5 March 12, 2002 City of Lino Lakes Community Development 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 RE: Bald Eagle Erectors — CUP Dear Sirs: NO.778' P.1/1 / 1//v mL°N z bee Via Facsimile -1982 -2499 This brief narrative of the planned use for outside storage by Bald Eagle Erectors will hopefully provide you with the necessary information to approve the conditional use permit. • Bald Eagle Erectors is a steel erector that Shingobee Builders, Inc. uses on many of its projects as a subcontractor and we are also representing Bald Eagle Erectors on this transaction and will be constructing there new facilities. The business of steel erection places all materials at various job sites and does not get delivered to the business / office location. The anticipated outside storage will be for a trailer that is used to transport construction mats and the occasional parking of the boom truck that is used for steel erection (this truck also pulls the trailer). I loop forward to any questions you may have. Sincerely, Greg Hayes Broker G • Shingobee builders, Inc. 669 N. Medina BLreeL, P.O. Box 8,1aoceLlo, MN 55357 -0008 (763) 429- 13001!!x (763) 4793267 General Contractor ConsLruclion Mnnga menL , Dez8n/Build ,, 1 t1 E8LaLe Services wv.a obee.co i CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS Independent School District No. 12 4707 North Road Circle Pines, Minnesota 55014 -1898 (763) 792 -6000 Fax: (763) 792 -6050 www.centennial.k12.mn.us Superintendent Dr. John M. Christiansen (763) 792 -6010 ,17%reAoropt • March 4, 2002 Mr Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes MN 55014 RE: Application for Development of Property Pin # R17 31 22 33 0046 and R17 31 22 33 0052 Dear Mr. Grochala: SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS CHAIRPERSON Dennis Halverson VICE CHAIRPERSON Mark Rehbein CLERK David Kelso TREASURER Sharon Johnson DIRECTOR Tim Lesnar DIRECTOR Christina Wilson The City of Lino Lakes zoning ordinance does not allow property being developed adjacent to school district property to contain outside storage. However, in the case of the property referenced above, I have spoken to representatives,.of the landowner concerning the plans for the property. Centennial School District No. 12 is aware of the development plans including some outside storage for construction mats and a boom truck. Based on the fact the property is adjacent to the school district's storm water management pond for the Middle School, the school district does not oppose the approval of this development plan and the granting of a conditional use permit for outside storage. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763 - 792 -6010. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, r. John M. Christiansen, Superintendent of Schools An Rimini (inns-triunity Rmnlover • ;ORNER /7 •�h 32 cur "/a)4cti. I 3.f QQ (A (fl 4J• 4045 LO 17 - 31 • Z Z 3 ' 04x.15- 17• 3f z.2 • - OaD(O u 33 A (3) (1) 0 � r i 7NW L.IeR /4/ ,/19 °f122 .- Xs Jf AUDITOR / 4 2 (1) (() TRACT A R.L.S. 3 SUBDIVISION N2.2 NO. 54 5 ' £4C4 6 (0 (413 "3 14 CORNER SEC. /7 )4 O7/ON NO. 95- 202 (Afls.L) 4,75•4 /3 °NO 182 TRACT C 4343. (4 A•1M /341 ai/ 3 TRACT fi -. Ja'27! ff0 t) Ats POST,„. ,-ROAD •r / 3, .` 1.x734 .1 (JxJgs "^' (2) ."-4$ (33) .s / (z t) 3 x 2 tti J 87.4s' 42! teas "roe ,K11 S.L. Be.io., 2e,v sou 33 5 3) GN) .W (Y) 5 (3 °) . (3?) � i . n 6 $ 7.pX s • 9 J ,.j, 24.40 21t34 8443 7841 1 PARK (•N) POST„.„., ,ROAD s y,43 1444\ /e,is 0044 .//% TRAIL,, (B) ▪ 4 0» 6 8400 e2w ( /2) 5 t 8330 fr 42rw e7.42'ee 4Y! s ('1) 9 (i) •o se7•et•43 A RS . l /3fse 'F% A �f) B7 •c: f2 E 336 s/7 4341 4941 • as fI Jet 4f 4> i Ant 11J /269) ( 1341 • (rrr'4i 4: : E (fz' : ( „) (4 1) '.(437) ': (.11) Jn P fYF : 417• 4 42, Y N,, 24.345 10.30 6444 Nat, 1471 (6 /4404 t,: .r eT4r 42 F --;;;;;7 . 7344 -. // / II /1 /11 r \ I 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ 1 SLATS WHERE REQ'D / GRASS SEED 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ SLATS WHERE REQ'D 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ SLATS WHERE .REQ'D CURB (IF REQ'D) [—ASPHALT PAVING CHAIN LINK GATE W/ WOOD FACING 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE \V SLATS WHERE REVD / • PLANTING BED [—CONC. CURB it- - h. ASPHALT AVNG -o' 2y,, / / 9 - ' V 0„..sz) CURB (IF REQ'D) 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ SLATS WHERE REQ'D /ROCK BED EPDM ROOF • HC CURB CUT ENTRY ROOF CONC. WALK z HC SIGN GRASS SEED PLANTING BED // / QS? /11-o / PA" • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 5B Michael Grochala April 10, 2002 Public Hearing • Comprehensive Plan Amendment: MUSA Allocation • Rezoning from R, Rural to R -1X, Single Family Executive • Preliminary Plat (Stoneybrook) Tollefson Development, Inc., has submitted an application for preliminary plat approval of Stoneybrook, a 102 lot single family residential subdivision. The request also requires approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to allocate MUSA to the site and a Rezoning from R, Rural District to R -1X, Single Family Executive Residential District. The site is located adjacent to and south of Birch Street and a quarter mile west of Centerville Road. This review is based on the following submittals prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated March 6, 2002 and received by the City on March 11, 2002: Preliminary Plat Existing Conditions Plan Preliminary Site and Utility Plan Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan Detail Sheet And Preliminary Landscaping Plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated March 7, 2002, and received by the City on March 11, 2002. Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Barr Engineering, dated August 16, 2001, and received by the City on March 27, 2002. Geotechnical Report prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc., dated February 28, 2002, and received by the City on March 27, 2002 Wetland Replacement Plan prepared by Barr Engineering, dated March 2002, and received by the City on March 27, 2002. • • ANALYSIS Project Overview Project Data: Existing Land Use: Total Site Area: Upland Area: Number of Lots: Gross Density: Net Density (Upland Only) 78.07 acres 54.73 acres 102 and 6 outlots 1.30 units /acre 1.86 units /acre The project consists of a 78 acre parcel that is currently in agricultural use containing approximately 19 acres of wetland. Surrounding land uses include sewered residential to the north (Pheasant Hills Preserve), unsewered large lot residential to the west and south, and a single family dwelling, pasture and wetland to the east. Land Use Plan: Zoning: The project site is currently zoned R, Rural District. Surrounding zoning includes R -1X, Single Family Executive to the north, and R, Rural to the east, west and south. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (MUSA Allocation): The City's 2001 Comprehensive Plan is currently being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. There are approximately 15.7 acres remaining in the City's MUSA bank. An existing development proposal, currently being reviewed by the City (Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition), has requested 4.5 acres. This potentially leaves the City with 11.2 acres until the Comprehensive Plan is approved by the Metropolitan Council. This is insufficient to cover the requested allocation of 54.73 acres. Stoneybrook Page 2 Comprehensive Plan (1990) Comprehensive Plan (2001) Site Rural Low Density Sewered Residential (Growth Area 1) North Single Family Residential Low Density Sewered Residential East Rural Low to Medium Density Residential (Growth Area 2) South Rural Low Density, Unsewered Residential West Rural Low Density, Unsewered Residential Zoning: The project site is currently zoned R, Rural District. Surrounding zoning includes R -1X, Single Family Executive to the north, and R, Rural to the east, west and south. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (MUSA Allocation): The City's 2001 Comprehensive Plan is currently being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. There are approximately 15.7 acres remaining in the City's MUSA bank. An existing development proposal, currently being reviewed by the City (Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition), has requested 4.5 acres. This potentially leaves the City with 11.2 acres until the Comprehensive Plan is approved by the Metropolitan Council. This is insufficient to cover the requested allocation of 54.73 acres. Stoneybrook Page 2 Rezoning The City is not in a position to rezone the property until the Comprehensive Plan has been approved and MUSA is available for allocation. Preliminary Plat: Lot Size. The minimum lot size of the R -1X District is 12,825 square feet of buildable land. All lots meet or exceed this provision. However, the buildable areas identified for Lot 7, Block 1 and Lot 6, Block 8 are, in part, bisected by wetland. While the calculations are consistent with the definition of buildable land, the intent is to insure a contiguous land area suitable for development. The applicant should demonstrate that the buildable area includes only that portion contiguous to the proposed house pads. Lot Depth. The minimum lot depth is 135 feet. Double frontage lots are required to have a minimum lot depth of 145 feet. All lots meet or exceed these provisions. Lot Width. The minimum lot width is 90 feet for standard lots and 115 feet for comer lots. All lots meet or exceed these standards with the exception of Lot 20, Block 8. This lot will need to be modified to conform to district standards. Outlots. There are six outlots included in the proposed subdivision. The outlots cover the majority of ponds and wetland areas. It is unclear whether these are intended for dedication to the City or proposed for ownership by a Homeowners Association. The applicant should be aware that any proposed dedication of outlots to the City would not be accepted in fulfillment of park dedication (payment in lieu) requirements. However, if the outlots are not intended for dedication to the City, they should be added to the adjacent proposed residential lots. Setbacks. The required setbacks established in the R -1X District are the greater of the following: 40 feet (Collector or Arterial Street), 30 feet (Local Street), 30 feet (front yard), 30 feet (rear yard), and ten feet. (side yard - principal building). The lots have adequate dimensions to meet required setbacks. However, the proposed building pad for Lot 20, Block 8 encroaches into the 30 foot setback for a local street (side yard). This lot will need to be modified to conform to district standards. In addition, pond and wetland areas will mandate a significant setback between proposed building sites and existing homes on adjacent properties. However, the building pad for Lot 2, Block 4 extends to within 18 feet of the existing wetland and proposed 100 year High Water Elevation. Every effort should be made to maximize the usable yard space on this lot. Street and Block Design. The site has two accesses, one from Birch Street at the existing Pheasant Hills Drive, and one at the Sherman Lake Road intersection. Street A extends southerly into the development from Birch Street, loops back and ties into Street B. Street B is proposed to extend from Birch Street to the easterly property line of the Stoneybrook Page 3 • development to provide a connection for future development to the east. There are five proposed cul -de -sacs which intersect with either Street A or Street B. • • While staff recommends providing a street stub to the eastern property line for future street extension, the developer should demonstrate how the street would service the adjacent parcel. There is a large wetland complex east of the proposed street stub that would limit future alignment options. Additionally, the street abuts the St. Paul Water Utility property, which contains an existing large diameter water main. This may cause conflicts with the sanitary sewer and water main stubs as well as the roadway. The water utility is currently reviewing the proposal for possible impacts. Should the street be extended to the east property line, the applicant will be required to provide a permanent easement for a cul -de -sac to be constructed until the street is extended. Signage should also be located at the street terminus indicating the future extension of the street. Street A is proposed as a large loop in the southern half of the development. While this section has two access points, they form the same intersection and create a situation similar to a long cul -de -sac. Staff has evaluated other alignment options, however it appears that these would cause additional wetland impacts. Staff is reviewing this issue with the Public Safety Department and the Centennial Lakes Fire Department to determine if there are any access concerns with the proposed layout. Staff is also recommending that the applicant evaluate a possible street stub alignment to the south of the development in the approximate location of Street G. This would allow for a future connection with East Holly Drive. The 2001 Transportation Plan identifies East Holly Drive as a Minor Collector and proposes its future connection with Holly Drive to the west and Ash Street (County Road J) to the south. While these projects are not planned in the near term, it would be practical to reserve the option to connect this subdivision to Holly Drive in the future. Grading and Drainage. A grading plan has been submitted and is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. A Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) Land Development Permit is also required . The house pad on Lot 0, Block 9 should - be reoriented to provide a more suitable building pad. The plan does not identify the Normal or High Water Level for wetlands No. 12 and No. 13. Mitigation sites are proposed to be fenced off after grading is completed to restrict construction traffic. According to the plans, there are no provisions for bringing materials onto the site or hauling off the site. Utilities. A preliminary utility plan has been submitted and is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Sanitary Sewer is proposed to be extended to the site from its existing location in Sherman Lake Road, north of Birch Street. Water will be provided by connection to the existing 16" trunk water main lying adjacent to the property on the south side of Birch Street. The water main is proposed to be looped back to the system by crossing Birch Street at Pheasant Hills Drive. Stoneybrook Page 4 • • • Adequate capacity exists in the sanitary sewer system to service the proposed development. In addition, the Black Duck Lift Station, which services the area, is scheduled for replacement in 2003. Drainage and Utility Easements. Drainage and Utility easements are proposed being five feet in width at adjoining lot lines, and 10 feet in width at adjoining street lines and rear lot lines as required. Drainage and Utility easements covering the 100 year High Water Level and those covering underground storm sewers are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Easements should be provided to access all pond and wetland areas. Specifically, easements should be provided to access Outlot F and cover the emergency overflow on Lots 6, 9, and 10, Block 8. Parkland Dedication. The Park Board discussed the proposed subdivision at its February 4, 2002 meeting. The board is recommending 100% cash payment in lieu of parkland dedication. As explained in the Public Services Director's February 5, 2002 memo (attached), the proposed development lies outside the planning limits of the Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan. The Park Board looked at several alternatives and recommended the payment in lieu as the preferred option. Floodplain. Portions of the site lie within a Flood Plain Zone A. Zone A represents areas of 100 year flood where base flood elevations have not been determined. The City's Floodplain Management Ordinance requires that principal structures be located no lower than one foot above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The City' s Subdivision Ordinance requires that proposed basements be four (4) feet above the water table (normal water level) and two (2) feet above the design flood levels of ponding areas. The submitted grading plan identifies proposed 100 year High Water Level elevations. Conformance to the requirements cannot be determined for Lots 23 through 27, Block 8 due to lack of documentation on the normal and high water levels of wetlands No. 12 and No. 13. The applicant should submit this documentation. All other lots are in conformance. The proposal is subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. If the proposed subdivision is approved, the Developer will be required to make application to FEMA for a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) to revise the existing Flood Plain maps consistent with the proposed grading. Wetlands. The project site contains 19.39 acres of wetland. 2.06 acres of wetland are proposed to be impacted by the site development. The wetland mitigation will take place on -site, by creating two new wetlands and three water quality ponds, which will have a total area of 2.51 acres and 3.27 acres, respectively. A portion (.20 acres) of one of the existing wetland areas will be converted from a Type 2 wet meadow to a Type 3 shallow marsh wetland to help facilitate site drainage. Stoneybrook Page 5 • • The developer is proposing to install signs demarcating the wetland edge at property corners or where the wetland edge changes drastically within a lot. Approximately 35 to 40 signs will be installed (1 sign per two homes) along the wetland edge. The signs will designate the area as a protected wetland zone. The sign will also inform homeowners that moving or cutting beyond the sign is not allowed. The plans also delineate a wetland buffer easement adjacent to wetland to provide additional transition from cultured lawns to native vegetation. The application also includes a Monitoring Plan that provides for monitoring of the newly created wetlands for a 5- year period. The report will be submitted to Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) on a yearly basis. The RCWD is the Regulatory Government Unit (RGU) for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act. Security should be required within the development agreement to insure installation of signs as well as the required monitoring. This requirement will need to be coordinated with the RCWD. All exposed soils above the Normal Water Level should be seeded with mixes consistent with City of Lino Lakes seed mixtures. The applicant should coordinate seed types with the City's Environmental Specialist. Tree Preservation. The site contains a number of Oaks in the extreme southeast corner of the proposed development and one on the north side adjacent to Birch Street. The is no anticipated tree loss as part of this project. Although a fence area is shown around the tree on the site, a more detailed description of tree preservation should be submitted. Fences must be placed at a distance from the trees equal to one -foot radius for each inch of tree trunk diameter measured at 4.5 feet above the ground. The developer should coordinate all tree preservation activities with the City's Environmental Specialist. CEPTED. Officer Mike Rumpsa prepared a review on January 21, 2002 (attached). He expressed concern with the additional traffic load on Birch Street, particularly with morning rush hour traffic. Landscaping. A landscaping plan for screening along Birch Street has been submitted as required. The plan consists of a combination of Deciduous and Coniferous trees. The City's Environmental Specialist is recommending replacement of the proposed Colorado Spruce with the White Spruce. Environmental Board. The City's Environmental Board reviewed the request on March 27, 2002, and recommended denial of the request siting the need to submit plans to the St. Paul Regional Water Utility and the Vadnais Lakes Watershed District. They also submitted recommendation to consider if the proposal is approved. Their comments are attached and, were applicable, have been incorporated into this report. Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The developer has made application to the RCWD for approval of a Land Development Plan and a Wetland Alteration Plan. The Stoneybrook Page 6 • application is scheduled for review by the district on April 24, 2002. It is City policy to withhold any development approvals until the RCWD has approved, at a minimum, a TWAFAA (Tabled with Authorization for Administrative Action). Anoka County. The County is preparing comments with regard to the proposed subdivision and impact on Birch Street. It is staff's understanding that improvements to Birch Street, adjacent to the project site, may be required by the County. RECOMMENDATION The current status of the City's 2001 Comprehensive Plan and the associated MUSA allocation prevents the City from moving forward with this application. In addition, there are several preliminary plat issues that need to be resolved including the review by Rice Creek Watershed District. Staff recommends tabling the action on the MUSA Allocation, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat requests to obtain the additional information and modifications contained within this report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Preliminary Plat • 2. Utility Plan 3. Grading Plan 4. Landscape Plan 5. Park Board Memorandum 6. CEPTED Review Letter 7. Environmental Board Memorandum • Stoneybrook Page 7 • • __Eel e,. of U,. 9E 1/o of Sec 27 PRELIMINARY PLAT STONEYBROOK 0 N 2643.19 .i� i 37 22.466 9.511- (16,136 MR) L r >a F • STREET B 1 �\ • 14.511 .4.1. (12.831 qty. \ UA�T �i L .. ., \ \• (10.8037 M.R.) \.r$ 2 is 1'116,607 011II (13,448 Mfl.M \■ \ 16.4343 nit PHEASANT HILLS DRIVE 1 I_ T r ( 4 17,513 Ws- 197 e. 2642.61 N00•40'SO'W O 22.915 2 MR. 20 99-• 28,145 qR. 21 30.573 .9.8. 16 _ 17 - 14,666 qfl 13.500 M.R. 8 262 Moot e,. of Ike Cool Naif of th4 Si. I/4 01 Sec 27 LOCATION MAP DENOTES PROPOSED 61111A80 AREA DENOTES PROPOSED PCNOII40 AREA - -- DENOTES PROPOSED BUFFER EASEMENT —? GRAPHIC SCALE no 0 50 105 200 ( DI ran. ) 1 boob • 100 R 400 LOT DATA (NOT TO SCALE) 1,0N11/UM LOT OEP1N 135 FT. I82810.61 LOT RIO N AT SETBACK LME 90 FT. AT CORNER 115 FT. AT 0/44 LINE N/A FT. Imo* G III 1 h..er a«u that ter • ** * RQ.• om+. -u .Iran i • • • J-o- i 1 � j ts*K../ u music I1 r STUB I.E. 890.3 0 0 0 0 0 SO NO 200 GRAPHIC SCALE. TR FEET OUTLOT F ( J P--' AN �A- IET 1Mt { GATE WLW 1 e• vc_L -„rte ECT TO . IE1 JJ CK/AORE!SANITARY UNNNNNNDER DR STREET JAW(/8ORE WA UNOESj BIRCH STR tiT TM Wit GATE vAL _I-., .,_1- 1 --4 PHZASANT Ii iii.. 903.1 I.\ 891.1 R. R.E.9t1.8 I.5' 9 `-- 11'11 L- 895.• 1 * **1 �-�--� _* PIoN� ,0•'7;rue•-r RP CI NM P O N D 3 b i OUR OT 0 9(1.t. 132 { arc n161 MX 1 Cr 1 111Y 11lOtbIL' MIO Re WMOSit r c 21,1 © r�1�esl��eee��e sa�aMR.rri r r+�e 1ax1LL!•••IS 1IP:1•fllr•JLI12. II Ott 11. 14' 11. 111 J1 1.5 . I. U ••L4.I .J IIII••t L1LEJ1 E•11J17'-r'IL.LI(v'JLJ �••� •1111••■••11111•1•11•L1111M1•.••••1•01•11111 La1 Ll. MIN•IL:II,JCJILII I I I:5 l_1 :l 1:{ 1Ui= lilhLJ��tL7Lt t.l:1 MIL 1tLl!_11._l4l:lJ• VJSAL MEN all ■RI! •111 1•��11 1L:1L1 15.4•1144112--.1 IS 111 .1 II!' E 111 15 '.1l'1 I!S 11 111 :A.II.4 I1 Att. IC711 LJLlalI ./11:111:111,11.1. ILE!11(1ll ■1 ! 1.111 S15'JI111_.l ll .AJIL,- II`i:l f!"11' 1.111.../17..:111.:110.111S 1t1111L11IJ1 E1It -1.'11 :',55' 11 11 All: Ili ? 11'il �11:11t 11 ' 11S1■ ,ILIal 1111/'.,1111 J1: 111 -11 �.5 LL.111.115 It,JLt:1l1 JI..1'.111 1141LL11•_:1121ICJ1 111 111; 11.1(..1 II 15 1J;11t_1l JIS- 1IS:11S 1L,l1 1ll[11111<•. 1111 IC 1 1 MIL,' 1L 1E _11`[11 iL11f! 11111/1 El ll!..114,1141/114.1111.1111/111111E, ••∎∎• 1t 115'11115'•, 5111 • 1111! 'll ! 11.11•11111111L'1��11•� =Lama NES 11211[:111 1If:4I1t1N.NNp.lGl MIL 111 lI',1 11 :6.11 111 t 11'1 LL:1111LIJ1 11...11. 1!!llII21C1 /!1 BUIE! SCAT_. A Jl.. -'ll. III AI II MIME). SI JL 111.1 JI - 15'11.111 11'.1.2 11 - I. AM i1■ 55 I 11 1E1/I 1t1LL.11.' 115 si L11.I' 115.' 12!•!'..1.13. 1'.1111:91111 -111. -11,6,11!! '1 fL�LL.11: •[ ItA �HII:I[2 IF2_ILLfL4lLL4LIJL11Lti MION 1!' ,11.....111 A IMM L�LP11��1? 1��I�•�11 L11- 1111/5! Il 11:!; It , III : lL1 /1I1L1.1L11' 1I_.lit, 1111 .11. S 111:0.11.1..1 tat1/1, lI'JILJI'r ll 11' ILIIEt• II.IL' •L Ii I1MI, V11..1_11 11 1 :. 11 ' L1V ■[ 111 JI!:ll Il ?:11.111 L511S,/L11':15'.111:11111_ 11.111 '11:51 IMO ■11■■■•••••■•■•••1•11•1111111111•1111MI �• 1 _111 1 I1:11I:1I L 11115 Il.41 L ?11.11 1!'.11['.L1'. 15' IFL111 MIL !.1111. :11 2 11 ..5 MO 111E ■IS 11 .1;! 112 111.,11.111.! 11!,1.1!+ ■LL1 114.1! 1! .'.l5' S 11 1,1!'.5 LLL_1!l 1111l1'ilL'llt!1 {1C 11141 V 11211111_)1•ll1i111'1l •111 '111 41l1!1 ��• f101f�•tt.I •1.�•1�■1 LL�1r_ 1LLlI' .111.51111L114.11.41.1/1111UUMM! .MIE.1L!. 1� fL__LIl..5..l11r_1 511 5 1-A •11ti 311• lJlLl1L1L.:11A1LlJCS.l1. lLJL2. Llfltl_l •SIJL ll:1A, 11, iJC:I I I...by ertet nn+ u�elar .t U 1 •Jy llv,..eProI..UI I En251.r U.5 h.. el Ike Stela r 11■..1.• wrc x OUTLET WNW% 3111ULTP.tE 3 MR 1 O_2_ TYPE 0, MS t1e o14 IM IlkitrdeesEMIlki iirdii ii'I iiiiihili it d fiLL1W1 1111111•L Ju:I111•11.LJLJL1•E_Lf91IIML1L• 11IL_2i1L..LILI1 MIMI MIIIIIILLIMIIMIII•I.L:11111 I:LuL7 ©II=FA1G* 1CL:10E:1 11,11.A.1111111MMII1•i•14 .I L'S'_Lo tILns?..I 91ri1C3:1L"LIL71311 . � 11ff1f�■U ■I •�f�■• fE1iLe1 BIJU' JL-r 1L1f EUS21l E_1L1CL:ll1'1EEd1.1E;o_:/E L:/[1iILIA •■••1L•MIN•11111■■11■•• 1111i{0/8(/4 514.1E-111JLWL LtE1lSI•111 LJLEJII= Il:11_1LLll:.t_ltl,9 1111iG111313 11L:112:1[_IL i.!n.L7mLL'1 ®c'.I :1[._d..iC:!�G.EII i i .111'.1 ®ILIKEIAY71', 1111.1LJal •115' LL JL41Ql1i1L. II: 11.,S11J fffitMil 11111L7y,J1171 3: 11= JIE:1L ?1(ENU! •L1<LJLSiILE:Il . i • 11 _11.'.151 MI 11LNL•LJILlL_JLJ1. I.: r1LLlll.lil11lJISIILL 11:lI JLS;IL.ILIIJ miL11114..• LSJLL11! 1114JLL!INESL111llCfJ1SalLLl1F =1C L3lI.LL•IIle1 15i Ii Lilt Ii' l5' 5114' 115'' 1LL1LJ1ilu '.111SJELl11JLJJL:LIl.:J1C1 fII111mt-1L'1LIIJLI11Y JAIL, Ili11I,•IL IIL 1 ; l.11.3JG�15,1 fly 15'1 iIIiI IILJl:_1LLILL lLI1E! L Il;I 5.•I4! 11JiLImaa1.111 • 1111:1 �1C11 :1E1E�JLSLIL:.JILILL'Ji'ILl1L': r.:u,11LLILIJE:•11.tiill11:11' 11.'[11 L1f�fL1 Wlm1. 1(LILCIL IIIL I] t! 1@_ lE •1LE1LEY111LL1C:6lC1L:IG1L.^_1 . i•r 11•U ■LSI! l•Tl NIL 11.'.11 IIL:I5'- 11'!1'IILL[JWLJLi:ii! :111 1L:,Li11 JJLI•J 1,.11':1{L111E J1!' 1L1r IL SJLl1L41IIENII1L',•1L*'1EL71:1[ .' 5 .1.11 :IC' i N. 11•J1EJ1E:1'..:11S.11L•1LL1LS __i[i1Lt_LE1S11L:S•JL.175`1:1E 1 LLLLLi . S.. fi�1N' •USl11if•ffl1f�0= Li-L4 11.1I2JMIL.i11: I l'lLi1L! ll1.1:1LLLL,IElJ!1I. 111 ._ iII: 1 :'.11'.11 IL/1 -f1 1i1:1L_JIL1LL11' 11' JL >_1CS•LL.1WNE:1CL1IEJIML11L2.0 11 .11 1L1•f. 15'.- :1LJt4 Il l? to /'.III IIII:JUlLE1LG:llJ1l:MUJ. :Il iC:ILA.JLL'1 LLL�LL11f�•11 •M11IMf1.1M••f•i•11 • -. •11.1111 ILIA i LIL JWAILLIIIE!N0 NIW11LNl5,5IJ-11MLiL1l 1t 1L 1t 4 [•[.:1111.'•57 :1LL114 4! 11LIL31L!11S1 /L 15'!:1lliIL&1L{CiGL15 .11 H ICrrl f� mmI I 1. 111 111E PSMl. SHEET TITLE _P TE & UT UTY PLAN TYPICAL STREET SECTION NNER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 17271 KENYON AWT&E, SUITE 103 LA1111'ILE. IINNESOTA 53044 PROJECT TYPICAL TEARDROP CUL -DE -SAD STONEYBROOK SHEET 3 SHEETS • RIM EL- 909.76 1PP PP i � J I I �\ \1r I \\ EX. HOUSE ( — EX. B NG i...,' ) / e •_ _ _ - _r= -- -904_ — -- -- _a97-- 75� - - - -- - - - -- _—_ r — m�� §o9.za --- _ _ - - -- ._906— i- - - - - -- - - - - -- ( POND 9 NWT. 897.7 100YR HWt. 900.7 \I / \ I / \_____ ____(------ ---- ---, .i,___ __L., __1., 24' CUP E 896.41 04.....=••••••Ti I se e0 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET TALL 3LT FENCE (TTI) • POND 1 NM_ 897.8 100.11 HWL 900.4 / INSTALL S .T RNCE (TT►.] A - CONSTIIIld18 DIVIANCE • 902.490 • 882.54 LA N S1 IIL w. 1 4 ET.) IP OF 20 EV. ■8 .78 a 2.O \\'- idea nu. URALL U0 1 / rma (nr.) WETLAND NO. 6 j \ POND 2 I `' -a, / -? NWL 895.5 1 OW/isLOw _- / 110018 HWL 898.9 \ 9900.5 ` \ o' / 1_ 6- 0 \ \ INSTALL / T • =_ \ ( ' --�� e. _ -0.. \\ 1/ cA• 18 RCP PICAMIEN * ingM ,t* ** 100 597.0 100'8 HM. 898.1 1 I4/11 ITC 1.ATp1T • OIlAO.16 1. ADO TOOL LAIC. KEY (SEE SHEET 6 1 WETLAND FILL (1.84 AC.) WETLAND EXCAVATION (0.22 AG) TOTAL IMPACT (2.08 AG) WETLAND MITIGAT1ON (2.70 AC.) WETLAND TYPE CHANGE (0.20 AC.) tram 1 n..er *witty Not I to Meg mowed by T• w w. toy *sot w.wwl me Na 1 .m • a+r uc.,..�..r�rms Eryln.. a. �• tn• 1a.e a M. Stets of u.,..a• MOT• 41 1 /2n• 14:014 I!I•/•2 P of ex Doe. SAG SHEET MIX PRELIMINARY GRADING & ioNroER TOLIEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 1 PROJECT EROSION CONTROL PLAN 1 172LAXEML MINNESOTA SUITE STONEYBROOK SHEET 4 r T3 Lt:1. i I I� ISEE SHEET 41 POND 200 NWL 897.0 100YR HYIL 900.7 FIND cer..Amocw ao7 Aa 25 50 ma GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET IN t#3TML 1RT POND 2 E- MEFt�ICY- I NNL 895.5 OVERFLOW 1 \ I a00113 HWL 899.1 \ J \ / / -\ 18'' P OF 2( :V.. .78 I 1e' RCA • I 'J ( \1 1f 322 ORAE. / ALL SLY \ • / :`. an.n.17 2 � TLAND N0. 8 RI DE132. r com 2. A �•'� as A< C. Mi. o.s :1161:111 ::;* • GRAVEL 0ot19•.` V2011 2141114IC2 PHEASANT HILLS DR. 300 899.0 Nt. 9Ot. EXCAVA 1) 9151 / / L TOP OF H2O ELEV.-892.51 \ \ OVER ?OWY \ / \ I ,� 3 / ,p SEE OCTA1. - -906_J / 0/ ■ cP II Itae.y calif, that Oda plan ov a pa.. N T• 1111111411, r,.y *.ct Ray a,...1aa and that I on a •Ay UpwlwnP.atMrar (nano." a•a •• t••e el Me State el t•.neeto nos he. 2301! Data I 1/O2 ) 2. K1. 9TC LAIPJT It GRA0M . 1. A0O fCLA INC. 1 KEY Of Al WETLAND Flit (1.84 AC.) WETLAND EXCAVATION (0.22 AC.) TOTAL IMPACT (2.06 AC.) MS WETLAND MITIGATION (2.70 AC.) WETLAND TYPE CHANCE (0.20 AC.) R..Iaone 1. I /22/02 3/5 /02 I)o1. t SHEET RTLE PRELIMINARY GRADING & I OWNER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. ��'"'"' FPO) flM nnNrRnl cm eti 17271 KENYON AVENUE SUITE 105 LAKEVALE. MINNESOTA 55044 ao.n 550 PROJECT STONEYBROOK 'SHEET 5 OF t. * ** I \ \ 991 EL- 905.90 , / 1 - / ' `j 0 O O i j / 0 SEX FENCE 0 -- ._�._..>.._- «.__._� -•��., —° —t -- ----- -7.;;;•s.. • rc>,¢ M►) a A u �1Oe, r � // 37 , — - -� 38 � Foci (TO \ ��� /� 30. OAK •••• g- 1,44 Dr- '211er 86 60 L00 GRAPHIC SCALE IN PEET `�, POND 8 NY& 904.0 104.8 11XIL M) 11(1. 0.02 AG WETLAND NO. 11 t/ -�G24. 16. OAK__ '/,>./14' 0A1V X16' 0 I 12 18' 0A 12' 18 0 10' OAK 1 14' OAK 14' 061( 8' 12 OAK OA lt' OAKi•A NNN e.OA _ 14 1 l4" OAK y`I4- OAK 20' OAK (2) 27 xi,. do EX. BUILDING 8 OAK AK 8` E$ KUILDING OAK 1 X. pAA eUILOf1NG OAK 18' OAK 0 0 • 6 0 Q 20 I I111YMy orlNy that MN pl• ••• r.•a.A by o.. r unar ,.y Soot .Wr'•_ •• end that 1 °,n a •Iy tka.•.dralr.Iya Cn••• unAr t . laws .4 ln. State of N....ol• R1E1lMI0 ILL 014 AC. TYPE 04N . • - - - - -\ 020 AC. / - NITML 1 E MCC »In ammo CO./1X160 TO RES' 9CT CDNSRIICOON TRAM % 2. NCR I10 LAYOUT ♦ GRADMM 1. A00 MLA UNE /ONO. Man• 1. 1/77//002 °i1 2 7/:/b2 Req. No. i7ae OeU ° 1 ro7 MSTNL 1Q IDICL AMU O NI N 9 001(X100 TO NOIRICT CONS7IMC1pN 1RAITPC MOLL iT Inati (TIT.) KEY A I • SHEET TITLE PRELIMINARY GRADING se . I Ov,NER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. Oman eAO EROSION CONTROL PLAN 17271 KENYON AVENUE, SUITE 103 LAKEVi11E. MINNESOTA 55044 1 PROJECT STONEYBROOK METLAND FILL (1.84 AC.) WETLAND EXCAVATKIN (0.22 AC.) TOTAL IMPACT (2.06 AC.) WETLAND MITIGATION (2.70 AC.) WETLAND TYPE CHANGE (0.20 AC. NE 1 I SHEET 6 'c[ 8 sEis 4 .EXAM RL MI5 AIL r 1GI CY OVERFLOW TSEE SHEET 5 MUM fit 0.09 AC. `C r/ WETLAND 0. 15 J �trAU fLT / c • • 1 • / m So 30• GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET MUM ru Aa POND 3 ao: _ • \� -' \'( \` WETLAND NO. 15 elt• \ ••` \ EXAM ti. .�, 030 AC. • 5,7 Apr WAS / .. / ... NN r\ _ ---- R s �� ice. ".r 4 6i' I I n..er wary that this Om wee ',reps.! by ••. > bads my dFM .r.2M.bn end PIM 1 am • day UO2rJrefwl.nd rob... under . tM lase W IM Stet. d M•..• <' ./////...;_1°-''',90:\ NJ 2. ME. 91t LAPWT • CRAWL I. A00 1211A Oar. .Y.Man. Man. YY((ee0 /1fIG/Oi� 1, I�t3/W 1 1 3/S/01 �— s)s__/ , (9.4 2 i \_ / X 1.// F92C/ KEY WETLAND FILL (1.54 AC.) WETLAND EXCAVAIICN (0.22 AC.) TOTAL IMPACT (2.08 AC.) WETLAND MITIGATION (2.70 AC.) WETLAND TYPE CHANCE (0.20 AC.) Crawl !Ao SHEET "TIE PRELIMINARY GRADING O*6IER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT. INC. rPRO,rECT EROSION CONTROL PLAN 11271 KEN YON AVENUE. SUITE 10. LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55044 STONEYAROOK SHEET 7 or 8 SHEETS • • • H 99.3 BIRCH STREET •••-•-.17 CSAH 10 4*** *PIONEER (I +I In WETLAND NO. 6 I i l' -"N • H L_ _J ■•■•■•••••• V I ----ITO- ./ BIRCH STREET .-- 10 ▪ „.. _Ss -."LA W 111E, vritv.PNW*--- crti,042:W.m,-*4; Y.84 1 \•:\ \\L‘N POND 0 26 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE 1)1 FEET *allnitnerky ". *4* .1.•••• VALIV-ouu Ct PLANT SCHEDULE KEY COMMON/BOTANICAL NAMES SIZE/ROOT QTY. OVERSTORY TREES 50 SWAMP MITE OAX/OUERCUS BICOLOR 2.5• aka 6 NM NORTHWOODS APLE ACER RUBRUILI WORTHWOODS 2.5" sea 9 PA PATILORE AskiAmws PENNSYLVAN1CA PAWORE* 2.5. BAB a EVERGREEN TREES CS COLORADO SPRUCEPICEA PUNGEKS er OM 14 BS BLACK HILLS WM.Ia/P10EA GLAUCA OENSATA 9 8 24 II here's, certify that Ma OM KM prepared *4 me or undo, my direct mosimislan and that , am a duly Regaled Lonrhcape Atchltoct coda Om Imo of the State of Iiiiimesola Name Ilmfolane Rao. Na. /435, Dote 31/7/01- CONIFER TREE PLANTING DETAIL z 7 /TEAND NO. 2 , , wE it LANDSCAPE NOTES • The L0*4d800pe Cantroctro Aelt proloct eite to NKOMO kevikr WW1 Ma mietlroo *nations War to allunitt04g a Old. • The Lawilscape coon:too shall tinily all WORM* an N. • Goopat 444 pike 4 CarrrINI•Ing •40 0044 .044 MIN graders le be preformed by abbrs. • No plant matera, Mort bo Ingolled ontI 00. nd canfanicilfot ham bow ocongieted 01 the • Al plant material riroll moe1 rtanclanio Mond In the Americas 00.00404 0* M■rallniMel-Anulorical Mondani 'Ix Nursery Mad. .401 .0.sorgtteranitericA trth.grepra:riLlhgrinotairgt... e0.444uans and gannet Imes need .ot b tilt logy fttreeier mud pogrom.. *0 OW spoof of GO WPM. • The LasOmmoe Contractor Mat pimento* neer Pont materiel Uwecisn me (1) criamlar mar Iran the Gme at .004. emplace of work from the comer. • Umre 400 rieeempamor lootmien Me nova. af plants Awn 00 the Om and the rormbor shorn 00 the plant Ilat. the mambas moon on the plen tette procadenco. • ,,,..7416r.re;ligo.r....7 =tie Installed a04041 1- d1. ;40 . 7 panto imolai 41 0*0*0 bale ta continuo. lisloti under conifer tram alt mtond 6' besand toe tree'. conrom MOO maw elockliaaa Om ell Naomi 1.3 Net from the treat' MM.. • igrbota:OCCIAIMAI =nit derraiit ta UM owner. t a SHEET TITLE onton.d Aol m— ss LANDSCAPE PLAN PRELIMINARY I OWNER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 17PLI.T4Y.°" MINNESOTA ........ I PROJECT STONEYBROOK Lino Lakes Public Services Department 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 982 -2440 Fax (651) 982 -2439 February 5, 2002 TO: Jeff Smyser, City Planner FROM: Rick DeGardner, ublic Services Director SUBJECT: Park Board Comments on Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat After discussing several alternatives, the Park Board is recommending 100 percent cash dedication for the proposed Stoneybrook Development. The Park Board looked at several alternatives including: 1. Acquire land for a park along the eastern edge of the development. This may be able to be connected to additional parkland that is acquired as the property to the east is developed. However it appears the St. Paul Water Utility Easement would make this difficult. Also, it is our understanding that substantial wetlands are located to the east of the Stoneybrook Plat. 2. Acquire two lots to provide a small park area for playground equipment. However, the Park Board didn't want to simply acquire, "less than one -acre park areas," as each development is created. 3. Designate the recreation complex as the park to service the residents in the Stoneybrook Development. The recreation complex will provide some leisure opportunities for infoctual play such as playground equipment, basketball, and tennis. However, the recreation complex will be used very intensely by all residents. If the upcoming referendum is unsuccessful, the recreation complex will most likely not be developed. When the Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan was developed, the Stoneybrook property was located outside the anticipated urban development limits. Therefore, the Park Board has not had an opportunity to analyze the parks and trails needs for this area of the city. Without the ability to look at "big picture" it is difficult to determine how this 78 -acre development will fit within the city's overall, long-range parks and trails plan. Therefore the Park Board is recommending 100 percent cash dedication. If the Community Development Department anticipates additional development outside of the anticipated urban development limits (as indicated in the Comprehensive Parks and Trails Plan) perhaps we should consider updating the Comprehensive Parks and Trails Plan to address the need for additional parks and trails. . sw /rick/Park Board Comments on Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat Memo to Smyser.doc • Department of Public Safety POLICE David J. Pecchia Public Safety Director / Chief of Police Officer Mike Rumpsa Lino Lakes Police Department 01/21/02 CPTED Reviews I have reviewed the plans for the Behm Century farm edition, Stoneybrook edition, TCF bank, and the Marketplace 2nd Addition. I have several comments. Behm Century Farms Edition: • The street names are going to be confusing. For instance: At the present time, we already have a Pony Ct that intersects Mustang Lane. • I see from the plans, A Pony Lane and Pony Ct are planned to gain access to Sunset Ave. • This is going to cause confusion for Police, Fire and Ambulance. • I have noticed that Pinto Lane has several small cul -de -sacs. Each of these cul- de -sacs has a different name. I suggest, if possible, to eliminated Pinto Court and have those houses keep the Pinto Lane Street name. It appears to me that the lot's south of Pinto Cove will not be buildable lots, and this will lessen the clutter of street names we have for this development. • The new "Mustang" Street names are going to cause confusion because Mustang Ct and Mustang Lane have already been used for street names south of Palomino Lane. • The Mustang Lane, Avenue, Cove, Circle and Mustang Way should be renamed to eliminate any chance of confusion for emergency personnel. • I understand that the land developer wants to maximize his/her land usage, but by looking at the layout of the streets and the names that were assigned to roads, I see utter confusion for emergency personnel. Stoneybrook Edition: • At the present time, the only concern that I have for the development, is the traffic load that it will pose to Birch St for morning rush hour. • Much of the traffic heads east on Birch Street to Centerville Rd then south to I35E. • I would recommend a semaphore at the intersection of Birch St and Centerville Rd to help manage the congestion problem. 640 Town Center Parkway • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 -1182 Public Administration /Records: 651 - 982 -2300 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2399 • • Department of Public Safety POLICE David J. Pecchia Public Safety Director / Chief of Police • The semaphore would provide a break in the Westbound traffic to allow motorists attempting to gain access from Sherman Lake Rd to Birch St a chance to merge into the traffic lane. TCF Bank: • I have no comments on TCF at this time. The lighting and landscaping look fine. Market Place 2nd Addition: • I am not able to comment on this due to the lack of information on the preliminary plat that I received. 640 Town Center Parkway • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 -1182 Public Administration /Records: 651 - 982 -2300 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2399 • • Environmental Memo To: Michael Grochala From: Marty Asleson CC: Jeff Smyser Date: April 3, 2002 Re: Environmental Board Review /Recommendations /Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat The Environmental Board made the following recommendations of the Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat, at the March 27, 2002 Environmental Board Meeting: • O'Connell made a motion, seconded by Halen to deny the Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat proposal. • The developer needs to contact and send plans to the St. Paul Regional Water Utility and Vadnais Lakes Watershed District. !f the development chouId go on for approval, than the Environmental Board made the following recommendations: • To pass on all staff recommendations highlighting the use of water quality design 1. Water basins and surface water management areas should be protected from compaction and planted with a buffer of native plants. 2. Basin filtration capacities should be enhanced with organic bed establishment in flow areas. 3. A sequencing and management plan should be submitted for all resource protection issues during construction and post development. Sequencing should include protective fence installation for trees and soil /wetland areas. Sequencing should include specific times the fencing will be removed. • Page 1 • • Sequencing should establish soil budgets and soil protection areas where possible, and the manner and location in which soils will be disturbed for general grading and utility installation. Sequencing should establish a place for concrete truck cleaning, and establish a time the cleaning area will be cleaned up post construction. Sequencing should include all issues that may result in disturbance or changes to an established tree or soil, wetland or surface water areas be addressed with City Staff before changes occur. Sequencing should establish equipment and materials staging. Sequencing should establish a method to restore soils to pre development densities where compaction is not necessary for civil engineering purposes. Management should include a plan to enforce buffers and include signage along property lines that inform no- mow /no- disturbance. The City should approve signs. Seed for buffers should be in accordance with City seed lists. A City approved contractor experienced in native plant establishment should plant buffer area. A three to five year contract should be established, and approved by the City, with a company experienced in native plant management. Covenants should be established with the HomeOwners Association prohibiting encroachment into buffer areas. An information sheet should be distributed to homebuyers at the pre - purchase time informing them of the buffers. This information sheet should be acceptable to the City of Lino Lakes, and proof given of pre- homeowner acknowledgment of receipt of the information sheet. Management should establish, and show that no changes to the surface or ground water will occur in the areas off the site to the West of the Preliminary Plat. No soils should be removed or imported to this site with out City approval. • Buffering should be provided for the pipeline easement in the NE corner lots. • Street lighting should be downward focused, and "no- spill." • A substitute should be used for the proposed Colorado blue spruce in the buffer along Birch Street. If evergreens are desirable, than white spruce would be better. Environmental Board Comment: As long as the Developer is asking for a rezoning, would he consider asking for a PDO to preserve open space, following the principles of development from the Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development? • Escrow Dollars should be received for: II1. One boulevard tree per frontage. • Page 2 • • 2. Silt fence and soil protection fence installation, enforcement, and removal. 3. Tree protection 4. Native seed areas and management 5. Buffer signs. 6. Soil restoration • Page 3