Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/12/2002 P&Z Packet• AGENDA • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 8, 2002 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. Emergency Apparatus Maintenance, 7512 — 4th Avenue, Site Plan Review, Tanda Gretz B. Russian Baptist Church, Ash St./Baldwin Lk. Rd., Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit, Tanda Gretz C. William Walton, 8140 — 20th Avenue, Conditional Use Permit, Tanda Gretz VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. None VII. ADJOURN • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT . STAFF PRESENT May 8,2002' 6 :37 P.M. 7:53 P.M. Corson, Hyden, Lane, p.m.), and Schaps, Lyden and Zych. City Planner, Jef Studenski; ,1 socia Kirmis (N Rafferty (Arrived at 6 :42 er; City Engineer, James Tanda Gretz; Bob I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Schaps called the Lino Lakes P1 p.m., May 8, 2002. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approve& III. APPROVAL OF MINU ril 1 0, 2002 oard meeting to order at 6:37 Chair Schaps requested the follog correction: Page 5, third paragraph change Open Mike to the PubliHaring. Ms. Lane made a MOTION t approve the minutes of the April 10, 2002, meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board as amended, and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 3 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared open mike open at 6:39 p.m. There was no one present for open mike. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:39 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 3 -0. DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. Nadeau, 20th Ave., Site Plan Review Staff presented the application by Pete and Norma Nadeau and stated applicants had applied for a Site Plan Review for the relocation of their existing home. The home, constructed in 1976, was currently located at 6644 -20th Avenue on a 9.27 acre parcel which was zoned Rural and guided for Low Density /Medium Density Residential under the 2001 proposed Comprehensive Plan. She stated the Nadeaus' had recently sold the land on which the house was sited, and wished to move the house across 20th Avenue to a 13.5 acre parcel they own, which was zoned Rural and guided Low Density, Sewered Residential. Staff reviewed the background by explaining She. Ordinance required a Site Plan Review for any structr to determine "whether the structure will be compatib] area, and conform to all City Code and Ordinance« of the Lino Lakes Zoning nto a vacant lot, in order e development in the Staff reviewed the land use compatibility, Staff noted moving the house onto the pr 20th Avenue, which was a County Road. used for farm vehicle access onto fields, exisj Anoka County for approval to use this existiff d require an access drive off sting access drive with culvert, formerly the site Plans had been forwarded to Staff stated althou l th tte -was located in a Phase 1 Growth Area, with City sewer expected to be available by !010, sanitary sewer was not yet available to the site. As a result, the Nadeaus had submitted plans for a septic system. Primary and secondary drain field sites had been delineated al o g with soils and septic design specifications. City water was available on the east side of 20th Avenue. To connect to City water would require tunneling und ;20th Avenu , and this would require County approval. The water service would be performed as a City project. The fee to the Nadeaus would follow the City's public improvement financing policy. Staff explained plans had been submitted for a mound system septic design. Plans delineate both a primary and secondary site, soils, and design specifications. The system had been reviewed and approved by City building officials. Staff stated the home was constructed in 1976, and was a 1,600 square foot single -story rambler - style. The home contained a full basement foundation and attached garage (470 sq.ft.), and met the Rural District minimum building dimensions. City building officials had inspected the home and found it to be structurally sound, with plumbing, electrical, and mechanicals meeting local ordinances. Staff indicated a detached 30' X 24' (720 sq.ft.) garage was also planned for the new site. City Ordinance allowed a maximum of 5,000 square feet of accessory building space, limited in number to one attached garage and two detached accessory structures, for a APPROVED MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 3 • property of this size and zoning district. The proposed garages fell well within these limits. • • Staff stated the proposed relocation of the above described home appeared to meet all building code and zoning district requirements. Staff recommended approval of the proposed Site Plan Review with the following conditions: Approval from Anoka County for an access drive onto County Highway No. 54 (20th Avenue); Application of all necessary building permits for the relocation of the home and construction of the detached garage; Mr. Rafferty arrived at 6:42 p.m. Mr. Corson asked when the home was moved Gretz replied all City Codes would need to be e necessary. Ms. Bill Nadeau, 6644 — 20th Avenue, stated he spoke with the building inspector and the building inspector had stated the home and existing structure was adequate the way it was, but anything new added additions, such as the basement would need to be up to Code. Pete Nadeau, 6644 — 20th Avenue, stated he was under the impression that Lino Lakes was in favor of City water. He stated he did not believe the requirements were reasonable. Chair Schaps replied the were not the regulatory board and they did not get involved in the estimate, of costs. Mr. Nadeau stated he had never' received a copy of any regulations. Chair Schaps stated hooking up to City water was his d ision and that decision had no bearing on the decision the Board would make to ght. Ms. Lane made a MOTION - :tdommend approval of the proposed Site Plan Review with the conditions as outlined in staff's report. The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. B. Thorp, Oak Lane, Minor Subdivision and Variance Staff presented the application by Mr. and Mrs. Thorp by explaining Mr. Jeff Joyer was the real estate agent for Mr. & Mrs. Thorp, who owned property at 901 Oak Lane. The property, zoned Rural - Executive (R -X), consisted of Lot 28 and Lot 29, Block 2, Lake View Woodlands, combined under one Property Identification Number (PIN). The Thorps would like to subdivide their property into two 100' X 423' lots, and sell the resulting lot to a prospective buyer, Mr. Wiliam Neeck. Soil tests had confirmed that the proposed lot could support a septic system, which would be necessary for this location. APPROVED MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 4 However, Section 5, subdiv. 2.B.1 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance required a minimum lot size of 10 acres for property located in an R -X Zone, which would preclude such a subdivision. Staff explained property was defined by its legal description. Every property had a Parcel Identification Number. The County would not allow the property to be subdivided unless the City had approved the subdivision. The City used the PIN and legal description to determine what the parcel was. Since the property in question has one PIN and the legal description included all the property, it was considered one parcel. Division of any parcel must comply with City requirements, including lot size. Staff stated Mr. Joyer and the Thorps were questioning when and how the two lots became combined under one PIN. It was their contention that the two lots were purchased separately and should never have been combined under one PIN. Were this the case, Lot 28 would exist as a legal non - conformity and could be sold to Mr. Neeck. Staff noted what was known, is that in 1983 Anoka County recor how that Lots 28, 29, & 30 were owned by the Thorps under one PIN (09- 31- 22 -24- 0030). In 1998 the Thorps sold Lot 30, leaving the resulting Lots 28 & 29 combined as they are at this time. In reviewing such a transaction, the separate sale of Lot 30 in 1998 clearly should not have taken place or been allowed according to City Ordinance, for the same reasons that preclude the sale of Lot 28 at this time . wever, an administrative oversight seems to have taken place, as records showed thatt`the To Lakes City Clerk certified the subdivision of the parcel to break off Lot 30 without Council approval. Staff presented its analysis by explaining City Ordinance required property zoned R -X to be a minimum of 10 acres in size. The Torps' property currently existed as a legal non- conformity, as did most all of the lots it ae Lake View Woodlands subdivision. Further subdivision, however, would increase, or exacerbate, the non - conformity of the property, violating City Zoning Ordinance, For this reason, it was the recommendation of staff to deny the request for a Variance from the minimum lot size for property located in an R -X Zone as well as the Minor Subdivision. Chair Schaps asked how- under the 10 acres was the lot. Ms. Gretz replied it was approximately 2 acres, consisting of lots 28 & 29, each of which is about an acre. Mr. Corson asked if staff had spoken with the County with respect to their records. Ms. Gretz replied that staff did not know what happened before 1983, and what they had found out was outlined in staff's report. Jeff Joyer, 8174 Lake Drive, on behalf of the applicants, stated they had an unresolved mystery pertaining to this lot. He stated in 1963, one property was bought, Lot 29 and 30. Two years in 1965 later they bought Lot 28. He stated this was all part of Lakeview Woodlands, which was approximately 70 one -acre lots. He stated all of the lots were built out, with the exception of Thorp's lot. He stated in 1983, all three lots were combined by the County under one PIN. He stated the Thorp's had always intended on selling this lot for retirement and now with health issues, they need the money for APPROVED MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 5 • medical bills. He stated the Thorps' never thought anything of the lots being put under one PIN and they were surprised this was an issue now. • Chair Schaps stated if they had a platted subdivision in the 1960's, how could they become combined by the County. Mr. Smyser replied the land was platted in 1947, which predated the City. Why the three lots were combined into one tax parcel in 1983 was unexplained. He stated they had no idea why they were combined. He stated the City applied the rule that if it was one legal description and one PIN, it was one lot. He stated when Lot 30 was broken off, normal channels were not followed and this probably should not have occurred. He stated for this division, normal channels were being followed. Mr. Corson replied that by combining all three lots, the County may have saved the applicant's money because they could claim al y the.` •p; y as homestead. Mr. Joyer replied adjacent lots to a homestead could als Chair Schaps stated that all the applicants were as ngyfor was $have` the lots as they were in 1947 when the plat was originally approved 1`. foyer replied that was correct. Ms. Lane stated the lot being purchased had an existing garage that was not being moved. Mr. Joyer replied that was correct. Mr. Corson asked if existing home; had a septic system. Mr. Joyer replied the Thorps' septic system was replaced a couple of years ago. Mr. Corson asked if there was r stated they had plenty of depth for a a secondary septic site on Lot 29. Mr. Joyer ndary site. Mr. Corson stated asked if bot] Mr. Joyer replied that was corre+ Mr. Joyner stated the Thorps had held onto this lot for 40 years as their retirement nest egg and wished to sell the l t this time. Is would have a primary and secondary septic site. Mr. Corson stated there were two existing lots originally and he recommended approval of the request. Ms. Lane stated she did not see any problem with the existing garage on the lot. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the Minor Subdivision. The motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 4 -0. • C. NEECK, OAK LANE, VARIANCE Staff presented the application by explaining that approval of this lot as a separate piece of property depended on City Council approval of the Variance and Minor Subdivision APPROVED MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 6 addressed in the previous agenda item (Thorp). Should this approval occur, then consideration of this request for a Variance is in order. Staff stated the subject site was zoned Rural Executive (R -X) and measures 100' X 423' (42,300 sq. ft.). The property was surrounded to the north, east and west by similarly zoned property, and to the south by property zoned Rural. The property contained a 1200 -foot detached garage. Mr. William Neeck was the prospective buyer of the property and planned to construct a 1,125 square foot home with a 630 square foot attached garage. Staff presented its analysis by explaining Accessory square footage was limited to 1,120 square feet for a parcel of this size and zoning classification according to the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance (Section 3, subd. 4.D.8 g) Since th p existing garage alone measured 1200 square feet, under City Ordin , a variance was needed. Staff explained City Ordinance required an atta hcd garage as a building requirement for the Rural Executive Zone (Section 5, subdivision 2 C.) As a result, Mr. Neeck was asking for a Variance from the maximum allowable accessiy.square footage cited under City Ordinance, in order that he be allowed to construct a 6 square foot attached garage. Staff noted square footage of the e tating`detached garage and the proposed attached garage would bring total accessory square footage on the property to 1,830 sq. ft. This was 710 sq. ft. over what was allowed under City Ordinance. The applicant had been apprised, in light of so much resulting accessory building square footage, of City Ordinance as it related to exterior sturagessues (Section 3, subd. 4.R.1.a.) and home occupations (Section 3, sub Staff revie five findings' br" a variance. Staff stated as a result of the above Findings of Fact, staff recommended approval of the Variance, with the following condition: the lot size Variance and Minor Subdivision discussed in agenda item 5B Thorp) must obtain City Council approval before this Variance was effective. Chair Schaps asked if any residents had objected to this request. Ms. Gretz replied staff had received no comments from the neighbors. William Neeck, 990 Main Street, stated the garage was built in 1975, and he had received no objection from the neighbors to that size of garage because it was an already existing structure. Mr. Rafferty asked if there was anyway the existing structure could be changed so it would match the new facility. Mr. Neeck replied that was his intent. He stated he intended on painting the garage, as well as reroofing it so it would match the home. He stated at some point in the future, he intended on making it maintenance free which was what the home would be. He stated the painting and reroofing may not get done right APPROVED MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 7 • away, but it would get done as soon as possible because he wanted the garage to match the home also. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to recommend approval of the variance with the conditions as noted in staff's May 8, 2002 report. The motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Mr. Rafferty asked if there was something that could be added to the recommendations that the structures would match. Chair Schaps replied it was in the record and therefore it would not be necessary to make this a part of the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. D. Raske Building Systems, Apollo Business P ; ; e , , . �,; vision and Site Plan Review Staff presented the application by Raske Buildin • eams:by explaining Raske Building Systems Inc. had requested site and building plan approval to allow the construction of a 25,568 square foot office /warehouse facility on the property located south of Apollo Road and east of Jon Avenue. • Staff stated the building would be supplies. • llyard "`Inc., a manufacturer of cleaning Staff noted in conjunction with t e request for site and building plan approval, the applicants had also requested approval of a minor subdivision to allow the subdivision of a 6.6 -acre parcel of land (presently described ' as Parcel E, Apollo Business Park) into 4.5 and 2.1 -acre parcels. The proposed office arehouse building would occupy the 2.1 -acre parcel. Staff explained th3 withdrawn prior to coy originally submitted in the Fall of last year but was by the Planning and Zoning Board. Staff presented its analysis by explaining the City's Comprehensive Plan guides the subject property for industrial use. The site's present L -I, Light Industrial zoning classification was consistent with this land use designation. Staff stated the lot and building performance standards for properties in the L -I, Light Industrial District were outlined in the table below. APPROVED MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 8 Staff indicated the applicant was proposing to construct a 25,568 square foot office /warehouse building on the eastern one half of proposed Parcel F. Such building placement would allow for a shared access with a future building upon adjacent Parcel G to the west. Based on the building size and placement upon the lot, future building expansion was not anticipated. Staff noted the office /warehouse building measured 34 feet in height and conformed with the maximum 45 -foot height requirement imposed in the L -I District. Staff stated the building was to be finished in pre -cast concrete wall panels which conformed to the standards in Section 3, Subdivision 4.B of the City Code. At this point, the applicant was unsure of whether or not the building will be painted. If the building was to be painted however, the applicant had indicated it would most likely be gray in color. Staff noted while the proposed building had been found to meet the material requirements of the Code, the appearance of the building was considered soniewliat`stark and could potentially be improved. To improve the appearance building, the following modifications should be considered: • • • • • Recess or project building entrances, Provide an entrance canopy or canopies Introduce foundation plantings to ac+ entuate building entrances Integrate varied but complementary colors or materials at building entry points Paint of all or part of the building (i.e the building's horizontal band). Staff explained the_s: to Section 3, Sufi stored within tl yard) that w rights of way. slid not US e an exterior trash handling area. According nance l'refuse and recyclable materials must be or within an accessory structure (within a side or rear eye level view from neighboring uses and public principal but tally screened Staff stated if trash and rec lanlle materials were to be stored outdoors, they must be located within a side or re a yrd and screened by a fence or wall at least six feet in height with a minimum opaqueness of 80 percent. Staff noted if trash was to be stored outdoors, the site plan should be modified to illustrate the proposed trash handling area and elevations of the enclosures should be submitted prior to City Council consideration of the application. Staff explained neither the site plan nor building elevations illustrated any signage. Signage was governed by the City's sign ordinance and separate permits and required a separate permit. All signs would be reviewed with the sign permit applications and must satisfy applicable requirements of the Ordinance in regard to sign type size and location. APPROVED MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 9 • Staff noted as shown on the landscape plan, a variety of trees were proposed on site. Specifically, a mixture of Ash, Maple, Crab and Spruce trees had been proposed. • • Staff noted that three trees had been proposed within the site's stormwater pond. To ensure the trees survival, they should not be planted in an area of the site intended for ponding. Staff explained to visually enhance the site, it was suggested that additional planting be provided in the following areas on the site: • Along the off - street parking areas between sidewalks and the building foundation • At the south end of the row of parking stalls that abut the west side of the building (to screen loading activities from Apollo Road) • Within the off - street parking island west of the budding (to visually break up an expanse of parking area) Staff stated the Environmental Board had recommended that Oak species (a mixture of Burr, Red, and Swamp White) rather than ever ens e provided along the freeway and that existing cedars on the site be relocated and„re -used in yca eening location. Staff noted the standards for calculating the off - street parking requirements for office and warehouse uses are outlined in Section 3, Subdivision '5 of the City Code. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the ordinance requirement was to use 90% of the gross building area. Staff stated a total of 37 off - street: o ' g stalls were required for the proposed use. The applicant's plan called for 51, stalls d significantly exceeded the minimum off - street parking supply requirement. Likewise, three handicap parking stalls had been proposed in satisfaction of applicable State requirements. y�� Staff explained tle applicant had indicated that the additional parking stalls (beyond that required by Ordinance) were necessary as occasional training sessions were to be held on site which would escalate par g demand. Staff noted the standards for-access and traffic circulation were outlined in Section 3, Subdivision 5 of the City Code and illustrated in the table below. The subject property met all of the requirements of this section with the exception of the curb cut opening. It should be note that a property might exceed the curb cut opening standard with the approval of the City Engineer. Staff stated as required, a lighting plan identifying illumination levels on the subject site as well as fixture type details had been provided and had been found to be acceptable. Staff noted according to the Ordinance, the source of lights should be hooded and controlled so as not to illuminate adjacent properties or public rights -of -way. The Environmental Board had specifically recommended that downward directed, no spill lighting be used on site. APPROVED MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 10 Staff explained according to the applicant, there would be 110 outdoor storage on -site. If outdoor storage was proposed at some future point, the processing of an interim use permit would be necessary. Staff stated while the Ordinance did not specifically define "outdoor storage ", it was the opinion of staff that continuous overnight parking of company vehicles constitutes "outdoor storage" and was not allowed except via an interim use permit. Staff stated as a condition of site and building plan approval, the conditions of the City Engineer's memo (dated 5/2/02) related to grading, drainage and utilities should be satisfied. Staff noted as submitted "Sketch and Description" illustrates a drainage easement over a ponding area in the western portion of Parcel G Additionally, drainage and utility easements were shown along the northern and southern boundaries of Parcel F. The acceptability of such easements should be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Staff explained as part of the previous plating "pt the property, park dedication was not received. As a result, the proposed minor subdivi ion ; "would be subject to park dedication requirements. For industrial development, a park dedication requirement of $2,175 per acre was required. With proposed Parcels F and G comprising 3.8 acres of upland area (exclusive of ponding)" a park dedication of $8,265 would be required prior to the City certifying the proposed minor subdivision. Staff noted the En 2002. ewed the proposed development on April 24, Staff stated this application was brought before the Rice Creek Watershed District on April 24, 2002, The Watershed District approved the tabling with authorization for administrative action (TWAFAA). Staff noted as a condition of 'site and building plan approval the Watershed District Permit must be received prior. to City building permit issuance. Staff explained prior to the commencement of any site work, the applicant would be required to enter into a development agreement with the City and post all the necessary securities required by it. Staff stated they were recommending the following: A. Approval of the minor subdivision to allow the subdivision of a 6.6 -acre parcel of land (presently described as Parcel E, Apollo Business Park) into 4.5 and 2.1 -acre parcels subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicable conditions of the City Engineer's memo dated 5/2/02 were satisfactorily met. APPROVED MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 11 2. Based on 3.8 acres of upland, a park dedication of $8,265 (for Parcels F and G) is received prior to the City certifying the proposed minor subdivision. 3. Deeds conveying the easements to the City shall be submitted prior to City certification of the subdivision. B. Site and Building Plan approval to allow the construction of a 25,568 square foot office /warehouse facility Square foot office /warehouse facility on the property located south of Apollo Road and east of Jon Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed 55 -foot curb cut width as approved by the City Engineer. 2. To improve the appearance of should be considered: • Recess or project building entrances • Provide an entrance canopy or canopies • Introduce foundation plantings to accentuate building entrances • Integrate varied but complement colors or materials at building • modification entry points • Paint of all r part of t band). ng (i.e. the Building's horizontal 3. Al recyclable ai aterials shall be stored within the principal g or within an accessory structure (within a side or rear yard) that is lly screened farom eye level view from neighboring uses and public is of way. If trash is to be stored outdoors, the site plan shall be d to illustrate the proposed trash handling area and elevations of enclosure shall be submitted prior to consideration by the City Council. 4. All signs shall be reviewed with the sign permit applications and shall meet the applicable requirements of the Ordinance. 5. To ensure survival, no trees shall be placed in an area of the site intended for ponding. 6. To visually enhance the site, additional plantings be provided in the following areas on the site: • Along the off - street parking areas between sidewalks and the building foundation (to enhance the visual appearance of the site) • At the south end of the row of parking stalls that abut the west side of the building (to screen loading activities from Apollo Road) APPROVED MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 12 • • Within the off - street parking island west of the building (to visually break up an expanse of parking area) • • 7. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted prior to consideration by the City Council, which incorporates the following: • The additional plantings listed in condition #6 above. • Oak species (a mixture of Burr, Red, and Swamp White) rather than evergreens along the freeway. • The relocation of existing cedars on the site in a screening location. • The use of native materials in drainage and swale areas. • Ground cover which utilizes City schedules. 8. A contract is submitted to ensure that native landscape materials are installed by a company specializing in native, landscape construction. 9. Outdoor storage (which includes the overnight parking of company vehicles) shall not be allowed. 10. Downward directed, no sp, as subried shall be used on site. 11. Revisions stated in the City Engineer's memo dated 5/2/02 shall be addressed to the City Engineer's satisfaction prior to the application being considered by the City Counc`" 12. A Watershed District Permit is to be received prior to City building permit issuance, 13. :P t`ior to the corm cement of any site work, the applicant enter into a velopment agreement with the City and post all necessary securities iequir d by it. Mr. Corson asked about the swell and the drainage to Apollo Drive. Mr. Studenski replied they were still looking at this, but there was no increase of runoff on this site. Chair Schaps invited applicant to make comment. Chair Schaps asked if there was going to be any chemicals in the plant. Andy Larson, Raske Building Systems, replied it would be storing cleaning supplies used in schools, hospitals, etc. He indicated there would be no manufacturing of chemicals. He stated all of it would be contained inside the building, but a dumpster for normal trash would be outside. He stated the remainder of the building would be office space. Chair Schaps asked if they could make the building more aesthetically pleasing. Mr. Larson replied gray was the color theme for the company, but they may put on some type of a banner, or a vestibule or some type of a decorative entrance coming into the building. APPROVED MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 13 Chair Schaps asked about the additional foundation plantings. Mr. Larson replied they had not looked at this issue yet, but they would do what they could to dress up the plantings. Chair Schaps asked where applicants were in business now. Mr. Larson replied applicants were currently located in Brooklyn Park and they were relocating because they had outgrown their existing facilities. Mr. Corson expressed concern if there was a leakage on the site, they would want to make sure it could be contained on the site. He requested this be researched by the City Engineer. Mr. Rafferty asked what applicant's timeline was. Nli Larson replied they hoped they could start digging in early July and have it done by the first week in January, 2003. Mr. Rafferty stated the building lacked the aesthetic value that was needed. He indicated he would like to see something done with the building to make it more aesthetically pleasing. He stated there were a lot of things that could be done and he would like to see that happen before they moved forward. Mr. Hayden asked if the trucks would go of the time, the trucks were gone ai uring the day. Mr. Larson replied 98 e parking lot was empty. Ms. Lane stated she did not see how adding a color =band would dress up the building. Chair Schaps replied they could add additional plantings. Chair Schaps asked frecornendation number 8 would have a 3 -year maintenance agreement. Mr r yser replied they would clarify this by the time it went to City Council for tear "review. Mr. Corson stated anted t e the chemicals retained on site as a condition. Mr. Rafferty stated he waited a condition that would add some aesthetic value to the building. He indicated he wanted a condition addressing outside storage and screening of the dumpsters. He stated he would like to see some color schemes. Mr. Raske agreed to look at changing the front entrance. Chair Schaps recommended they add additional plantings to the front of the building. Mr. Corson requested the following Recommendation No. 14: Staff will investigate means to ensure all spills are to be contained onsite to ensure they do not get into the septic and drainage system. Chair Schaps requested the following Recommendation No. 15: Applicants will add a different building entrance and/or add canopies and accentuate the entrances with landscaping. APPROVED MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 14 Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve a minor subdivision to allow the subdivision of a 6.6 acre parcel of land (presently described as Parcel E, Apollo Business Park) into 4.5 and 2.1 acre parcels subject to the conditions as outlined in staff's May 8, 2002 report. The motion was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the Site and Building Plan Review subject to the 15 conditions as outlined in staff's May 8, 2002 report and as requested by Board members at tonight's meeting. The motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 4 -0. E. PUBLIC HEARING — Glenn Rehbein, Vil1aee.Hill Ware Rd., Rezone to PDO and Site Plan Review Chair Schaps opened the public hearingt NW corner of Birch St. and Staff explained Glenn Rehbein Companies h d submitted an application for Site and Building Plan Review and Rezoning to alloy` the development of a neighborhood business center at the northwest corner of Ware Rd. and Birch St. Staff noted the projee was scheduled far;apublic hearing at the May 8, 2002 Planning and Zoning Board Meefiing. However, d e to recent modifications to the site, the developer hadirequested the review of the proposed development be postponed until the June 12, 200 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting. Staff stated no action as necessary at this time. However, public hearing notices were previously distribute Staff noted that a letter hadlbeen received with comments and was to be entered into the record. Brian and Katie Politiske, 6509 Hokah Drive, by letter dated May 1, 2002, indicated they were opposed to the rezoning of this property for the reason that they did not believe there was enough room to squeeze a strip mall into a residential area where it would negatively impact their quality of life and property values. They expressed concern about the lights in the parking lot, increased traffic, noise, and the view from their property. Chair Schaps asked if anyone from the public wished to speak. Nobody responded. • Ms. Lane made a MOTION to continue the Public Hearing to June, 2002 Planning & Zoning Board meeting and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. APPROVED MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 8, 2002 Page 15 Ms. Lane asked if this project was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Smyser replied it was consistent with the Plan. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS Ordinance Revision Update Mr. Smyser updated the Board on the Ordinance Revision. He stated the next meeting was scheduled for May 23, 2002. VII. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Lane made a MOTION to adjourn the me Sm., and was supported by Mr. Hayden. Motion carried 4 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. APPROVED MINUTES • • • AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz/Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: June 12, 2002 TOPIC: Site Plan Review for the proposed expansion of Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Co. ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Emergency Apparatus Maintenance, located at 7512 -4th Avenue, is a company that repairs and customizes equipment used by fire departments. The current 5,600 sq. ft. building was approved in 1996 with plans which indicated an area for future expansion. The company would now like to expand into the area indicated in the 1996 plans, and has submitted an application for a Site Plan Review. ANALYSIS Site Description The site is a 1.12 acre triangular piece of property located to the east of 4th Avenue within the Lino Industrial Park. Superior Masonry & Concrete abuts the site to the north, with Nol -Tec located to the south. • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 EAM Site Plan Review Land Use Compatibility The following chart summarizes the land use (according to the proposed 2001 Land Use map) and zoning surrounding the site: Direction Land Use Zoning Site Industrial General Industrial North Industrial General Industrial South Industrial General Industrial East Industrial General Industrial West Public /Semi- Public (prison) Public (prison) Building Issues The existing building measures 5,273 sq.ft. The proposed addition will be located to the east of the current building and measure 5,450 sq.ft. The expanded area will be used exclusively as repair bays. Building elevations show the proposed addition matching the existing building in terms of color and materials, which is rock face concrete block. Building height is similar as well. Setbacks The following chart describes the required and proposed setbacks for the site. Setback Required Proposed Principle Structure — from street 50 feet 60 feet Principle Structure — side yard 10 feet 10 feet Principle Structure — rear yard 15 feet 15 feet Parking — from street 15 feet 15 feet Parking — from side yard 10 feet 10 feet Parking — from rear yard 5 feet 10 feet • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 EAM Site Plan Review Parking /Access Issues A new 30' wide access drive is proposed onto 4th Avenue. Parking for the original building was calculated at one stall for each employee (6), with nine stalls actually constructed. There are now ten employees, with proposed plans showing a total of 19 stalls to actually be constructed. City Ordinance requires light manufacturing areas to provide "one space for each employee or one space for each 2,000 feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater." A minimum of ten parking stalls are thus required for the site, calculating one stall for each employee. Grading/Drainage /Utility The applicant has submitted a preliminary Grading, Erosion Control and Drainage plan, although some information remains incomplete, per City Engineer Jim Studenski. The memo dated June 6, 2002 from Mr. Studenski to Michael Grochala details these issues and is attached to this report. All grading, drainage, and utility issues must be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to any City Council review. Rice Creek Watershed Recommendations Rice Creek Watershed has issued a TWAFAA for the proposed project pending receipt of several administrative items, including: 1.) Incorporation of infiltration practices. 2.) Existing versus proposed swale capacity narrative. 3.) Revegetation specifications for incorporated infiltration BMP's (best management practices). Lighting Submitted plans show wall pack style fixtures, which do not comply with City Ordinance lighting standards. The applicant has been directed to use shoebox style, no -spill fixtures which will deliver meter readings within City standards ( <1 foot candle on public streets). Landscaping City Ordinance allows impervious surface coverage up to 90% in a General Industrial Zone. No landscaping is proposed, and staff is not recommending any as the addition is located behind the original structure and is surrounded by similar industrial uses. Trash Enclosure The trash dumpster servicing the original building is located in the area planned for • expansion and, as a result, will have to be moved to a new location. Original plans • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 EAM Site Plan Review approved a dumpster without an enclosure; instead four pine trees at the rear of the lot were installed. Since the pine trees are only approximately three feet high and offer no real screening of an otherwise exposed dumpster, and since the previous trash arrangements were made under a previous Ordinance, staff will require that the dumpster be enclosed as required under Section 3, subd. 4.G.2.c of the current ordinance. Sprinkling/Fire Suppression The building is required to be sprinkled. Review of the fire suppression system will be handled as a building inspection issue. CONCLUSION Plans for the original EAM building, approved in 1996, identify an area to the east of the building to be used for future expansion. The current application describes a 5,450 sq.ft. addition to match the original building, for use as repair bays. Staff would recommend approval of the application, with the following conditions: 1.) Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction. 2.) The City Engineer shall review and approve all necessary grading, utility, and drainage plans: incomplete grading, utility, and drainage issues identified in the memo dated June 6, 2002 from City Engineer Jim Studenski are to be resolved to his satisfaction prior to any City Council review. 3.) Permits be obtained by Rice Creek Watershed prior to any site work or issuance of building permits. 4.) Cut sheets showing a lighting fixture choice meeting City Ordinance (shoebox style, no- spill), as well as a revised photometric lighting plan which reflects the new choice of fixture style, must be submitted prior to City Council review. 5.) Trash/dumpsters must be enclosed within a six -foot high fence or wall. Elevation plans of the enclosure must be submitted prior to City Council review. 6.) A performance agreement shall be prepared, including financial securities, and executed prior to City Council review. OPTIONS 1.) Recommend approval of the Site Plan Review application, with conditions. 2.) Recommend denial of the Site Plan Review application. 3.) Return to staff with direction Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 EAM Site Plan Review RECOMMENDATION Option #1. ATTACHMENTS 1.) General Location Map 2.) Site Plan 3.) Floor Plan 4.) Wall Sections 5.) Elevation Plan 6.) Foundation Plan 7.) Preliminary Grading, Erosion Control & Drainage Plan 8.) City Engineer Memo • • i WOE PEW. NYMBER -Ed - -4-- — 1 EXHIBIT # 1 FN- 3FREET Nru. 1 dune, C ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1111 yam-=. avrmo2 �• . trifiniNgii 0 L44 12 4 13 12 11 10 8 PARK TLOT n ra 23 STAY HIGH Il)♦ WA itifir - —'— APOLLO �� _ SUS /HESS LINO LAKES L REHABILITATl0ti CENTE 1 0 TAT HK HIGHWAY HORS - 14TH- 3TREET- • • • t_ 00,0 LAN fAs ■-5 -4 • 06..1 • A • ,. OXISZ13;r4ilis/Ikpli 114.44> ft.., • 14.4,0o. (5111,13 5,2r) wAtC114 (61.;:fatfg • 1 • • s't 1. d • _ at-trsTma•-.4P P-S VVICat AN( ti Arztraiwc.P.VI • -1? 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /1 a .torwertsieN I 1' fwee t' 1 it a 3 ,t Jrw thgriliN...,/ • /NN NN N N N N N N N N/N lci;'-17.A.-;_-.-..17 _ rtair-rf. / EXHIBIT # '5A-r_tot•- .5tog_1/4r3ro_o_ _E24-AtLYA-saz. 1. .5.413, Op./ G. .IS=10 _ . tEn.lac_t_Wfxr. t•17. Actn.•) --7:(60,1at=0F=IEZAVI‘tcrtfat:40.4t4ti:c:42-_7:1,1-.2 ts.a.er 0,1,4 7-iazuzarra4..--.1r.w.r.4sPe4t444.0. —.:_irscaritaz4—cr.rjagriscARttitt 6"..tcrktetlis4K•ri:411i.le 14* ) re1P.1-; tonti • roe -taer/4,-45.4.seas...-:_lAR-1-1: ritortaE %le - -1.340 14* SHUT oF • • • •J• CrmutAr) fri,‘*.t"" 5 --anCe.t.-_NITN__ttirF42201; I.L.Obai 4,114k vo,414... ( 401-40 st) -4caUsar..,..mItt. tica-ALY iv.d Kow.ow riftuw.. p41./.$410. (4/4 M. riAtirdyNtiogiul (4..LIED .1•Theatm4.. SPEAK. ‘,..............._ l'isirrikter:Aiit4.9 gail‘41140 IP Lev, raw 2o, 40 r9-0.P( 1,1VJE, fa. 14. 4• Oc•Gur04•4-9 7: • I 4% c .3fttO MUNN FP nueswk,,,,r6g).. .11F411/410,411/211,511/4/1/44/13/0■ • - • : I : ,4 -sxtcpcmic,, efine.4.4.4", ro 7 4 r...<1...rri4r, rsr-Sivem it41.4*". 3'7ft...wag -pi _utiar 1141.7.2*.w0.4 -(4 .=.S11144:7_t4").t.tlii,QaC7 IF" R. ( 14- ..areillt:VCP5r.,. 8' -0.441i"..Y'N4; 44,4,44. Etue.TwAf raw.,44, '0 t.4 v. 1...rt 7..-ESElLi.dfas -L:wests.rp: - _ -I-WM. 1:11:pielbi\ r ! I '• , Itira,•44'-o_akte.0 ,N.er (2...? IlirJr% V.4" t-e..3-044 emai-.. pie. wok. word ■••e••••, WiNtaas, tO*R 1 2 -go 1., 4. 14 akit•rq-, y . k, ... ,..„, Djrt sr...n.„,„3.,:A3.6..‹..."-I.) ., \N / . irl\-c-, --I ' 1 , N 1 / 1 .4115, 12.14 [L I c22 - ibt•o" APP IT VS.1 EXHIBIT # 3 7 , • • • :10!"..0xtetart447.-NASON (rt -1,11aP•-:=1;-,Akasezyse7..Z.A1411....IG ( 14-A 0444.IP44.44-ti) 44.4,4*.-Dtersuct4)-4-oms-4 12-3 r'lf j rultitt. wag" pivi....er4 SilicorINgi 11. 411) 1,1 if- ,' PPP./ •lenir 4.k.D / • 006. • 611*--I'llyter• ,-• Exignig, [2" 0$6040:. W44•••‘• 3 ct114ik .P424 -I 9L,/02C,,R10I-11140•0401:0 2NeA03._1O4.v1-.0. 1 - _ / .14:orw owlI 2:tr:C41.4:PSJ._ttal•-^1 Mirst 17.,t4A_ Ana!: rot-'4 4 fielmuttabLn40. .4"--F'}I__._:,Textol'-i4.1041C,..444ti or • 1:111”4:3 On 1 I1 ,I014,r 00-4 teL.s --14aCc Lejt.tiir *44x...0 • -.047‘1%:.,10for 1104‘, _ . Prf.1C-4 4 rAN as. c 4.ffe p.. I..) .pst.••=210. 1 fe44.4. • 4••• 141,9iT• 14150•01 ften.4. orwit,„ rx-oco- co../1146 f : tag: .ratt.tclot‘ikL- 4;14 logui _ 11F-Z ZIR41.P a ' .. • IziaM•.taxisysm Tzcof Imo roscu -wi•-4-.4olteoF H,Ertpi.A.Aws •-• -roph.ism-o144i Ioscx-*-1 • , Qk_icer_40-;C: •44"Pulicrlt- gq• •111.11•1111111 Er 4.-..S•11kg311191.14 f19). FO-INV•513.F.O.ciwtr. SV_-_Z-seF_WOrr&T,i4"1■4 Us, 045) 1-4.-p-4siera-Am,r4147Kciliftior-$4•41 P-acep• leAt-rtew..stkuot,A.-riolo-- • -,teraa3Amou.a.A.Tc_FipAw..Aast.a.orrto,p..3 r--" r-t. 2 4A --NM - 1 '12.4 -ro4Ipitweistiareinv- :.70.w.w.stazzgam wapc) buscr-34 - 41.,orp Ter - • Pzicaul,M3ausutta ____+ ...lotwird*Sesual tivai•Oztsze.:. ,..-••-tuatipi-1.4..7Yrk'sx61H4 kI3V wie-tc,1994z• ist1-4,Tizuar -aacJeZ idiZt. t.5 co-T 117071.T.E.:44+ :=11.c.tz.x 14 -o. I "--•IN.S•at,41.7a) 14•Wra EXHIBIT # .744,,n4N50.1.&1• • -61811MTRIZA.-"afors,t,) ptr: tels,-4-a,r+0 •rmittzt2.4:- - Iw PAD 7.4 rtEr*F•Ft411,11g.:.• """"" "" • Ki$1.11.4n0a 0. • 10 .5EcrtN1wmt. (TIQt/ &irL -ac41.6 Y-1.0 - 4--- itruct`.!•-rp-:!.• • 2 __St.e.1.C1: ”E'f131" P4Vrttf 0.4.1vr 444■J -Nar3.3`7irria.1.1. 160 t5Chrnt_E.L.EVA 'El OW •±,) :s:E- c-1 LAAAltA. 14.oft7e•rST etrIL I P.? rrIC cf-dr. I F I EJ . keluvc,rtr-A. &g4 ?Sir) k4.C4 f.....;;;Ate# -ptygi .t GK• f-ert4t- /M I47 re:AA/MO .ffoc14. ?Mt. CAW 241:14- - .--.2-.- - • VIE •rENt600t1•. • 4 ) . • - - . f _. * A_ tc• , . f : . . _ NE v-' . 4- ------- . • • • — _. CY/ t--3, 'AO g rt}1.:SI,xyl4 '71 NI . ' 1/411.14 „ _ .ThLNUL. 40,A, Xe 00 ' _ _ CoAki - L • 4-6,o f • C.,C rY-t IF.1141/O Or/f a.e. fel 4 _ =72= • • - ■ _ • • - -- 4 - • CHU . .0 trt ft cm_r -ND% • CiAli Deo a. S EXHIBIT Stiar 4 OF ve" • • • t 441 C. • Ai N 0 .Poor. L. . JOISTS 0Z o •I t; --7 --�K -. 2'.a curl: Stns _cIL4a1..cotry tr.'s I, • - 'SLP $La Lag iri vtt,ry efi 1.2__ f -1 1 1 1 w w 'Dr. 14.J L1v E LOW 1 ZS .. (\/�N�O -• P4t-g7 •1,n4lk•,r p _hM;we. PLPN 4 i 'L Is- C` 15'4•• E1•I4.7 r.2 L �• 6,8'42" A1Cw ~ " ,4, ac�am. _ --+i ' " It M • L4 4 �� N. / / •' , i j. • f ' 3143 1.9 Prr 1 /b• c.0 . w.tc.S f \ 41 0156 44:A0. Y\ , r -2.1' -t r r ' l to �\i \ \ . • -� r_-_-.7277=- i i i i Lt /. ' /`�' .../ • -3 • t g ) IO` I l I 1 1 l r•- --1 1 L r�ff( r.2 N I z- I+ • ZNw+.-- $' Cyv 3 Scream E14Shut,. G'Q..JL.F,..sul. -� EY,t! t D ) m r.4 , K .--_ - -_ _.- _..._..... - . • s.. , 4441L , ' tio.∎ivol \'\ wTuP G• CIeNC• 5410 •Rt F14,..-4,_11.4.c. 1 l:.cit4? pTi i; 3 �r c - 101 %+i 't' .A H. d. cpitp ctt'4 1 wJ} 6:K, %IC'tn tr ta,M I 1 NI i I!i "M.1. tevAtt. fit4V4 1- OtFftJi -.3. i I • ig L . ' \ \ - - t r--- 1 -x t 1 C- 1 ,"L.- -• . . L5 LI I_1 • / - L5 -c ,•toms r4 Et 11844 n 1 I* n Ia: ., y. i i a •i•P Of tR'R4t• `1 -0 FJ 1' :c,' J 1sa7 SPK1NIL -QI v.f Ij ; oq Y Ij Ili4. 22 4A 71'1 F'f e c r E�tgSTif74 ;� N N :Cft. 2e» rx,.4r• 5l6 d, Pv:+P l tr I..Lt.13 _(I YA-rr Ek N. 34`/4.. 1o,„. `1.L Il 6-4'4 .. 4'O et 9u trtirt • i.It• T3 153.4. QL fl' a ra '�avF.: S''�AMIFiu rLA1.J • 2j15 .r' ' a. ALL 01411 ..J u4a 3 VC+UN{1A- 0 %) LIry TBL. 1 LAn/ i17yTit SCKVOUL.0 - 'C'Ftl ' LIUT1U. Rlk• C•.IC P1••4213 u.•17,.:45 Dpi L�• . 2.! ..5.. ' i'+ R'1I• L� t•✓S 8') .4;17.44 (ts r4U f IseP e), 54,40 1:S34itw'141...c -1. . ?Y A ttilA v • crs6T1A IPTl2 04 tog - k•g9b tt3• eoT fl•ly V. VI .5 s• - 'p t 3:'b ttl'AL C.C•ta1 tior_ E :`•: el.: Ito 4• u�Rt•i) Ku 1,0,14 '014 !$ w' -"SC-T In tPAU r.4 L i't) 4,. .yC - -- a t • -10.e4" nnitOtit r3 FP .36 ni1 - 2'1,•,''113° , O u) NC L. 44 7. • tie :p xco• 2 - SE? I)J Ei»riti f:At • w::,.0 ■••141 ••••,,tvr flit. 4044 ADO 445,4 ••TI 1 _11J1 • EXHIBIT # �p �'L�N -1✓Q.� ;�Af•�'. {�` $rL N17 \V44.4.S oN 2eAtf2+ -'-_ fgee_ Lot . • 5. &!T CAW( - 4 SLI•PS -- rte. -$7•1,3 'Pax 4-4•e d a.c hE•�t . TY.PitAt VCATICAL a.whtr _r. triF 4:.e. ?2 " PILL. • wALJ. 7:11 5 eat.. C4A t :. "1uP FP16 F_t.. �1fo -$• • L CODB3: 4.i ...da ..41997 U3. no 9.14:1 Code a. adopted. L LIVE LOADS: All ne(r« swap wry. .4.1:01 lo paned. and gher vabaal lerfaaw - 40 P.3P. Bay.., .o.1 M parapet bad Ash roof area. &i s. par Moor.... BaiIMt Cd.. Floor 1.0041.. - PSF. Wind lard • 30 04111, 0.parw B I Al rad....M3 Mac on ad rig . We .11mwMe hearira eapcity .(.7001 • 101. Wrac to manacle N.. ' • .. • 1a auveoa .d b..kfil.wa.aw..4.t.w.. 4. All em.a.4. .h.3 by rr \a1 rwpM marg. of the fol4.. 1 draw eanprenive .M.albd 23 days. . 5.n,1.. aapradcoecn► • 4,030 121 ab ..baud. b. Faotiat dws• basal up Cc. 2300 PSI e Al agar ..01•4.- )3703 I'S2 I All , f.ena 33.,, .3.01....,, billet swig hen .odMrF6 to AST AA A.613 pale 60. Cudi.n,.s hag .ba1 Mp 41 di..c.n won .pie.d bel ..l 1.0 than II iglus. N,0 awe !Ma 44,01 44. Mn .Ma be .plop. is ary a. Ji.el:a. All v.rtiad ban shall M dowsed la foetal ad p.ejml 40 J.. 0l mien el4wg. shown er angst. C rats magi wa'4. io Its-14 a(an •edibgw �..3.,w of iioklt., peal hawMp. PravW. Iw..,tal naming e*.y oed tags. 00.J bsmm, • pi..ler., vaniuly 634.1 Mock comics M fled with 3003 P31 .o. ,.4. Sac • ..elw.cwnl.d aloggralfor nalweq. AS e...vy grab to he Mid .p wig type "I• .atsr. 7. All .trvet.al.ul .dkw coed o6..tw a s31 conform t. A31'M - A•66 (Py: 36,000131 d.). All .guemral owl for Who mh.lw .ball eo.Icrn 10 ASTM P.300 grail. B (FY: 46,000 PSI). Been .,.oecg.. .Ml be b.Il.Yor gelded and .Mt emferu M p.4 of Iha A154 ld.wl of 04.41 C...rddh.. Bolt. .hall Ea 44" ASTM A- 323 •TC• type aerial u .kern.. &rag Ytmid. wd Whams .l all • bang hawing oast coign. Pre jJ. hen bw.ioi plates d a0 beam Marot .r.e.ry. P..vide j.hl .ail 31st b .,* ogles u .Yawn on p33. AS 9w.au.1 ..el 40 rwabe ow shop owl of 1;41/4 inhibitive prima. Sped boas. ad Light la 6. Py • 30,000 PSI tea L Sped joie. le300..gd .ad ,MOil.. ...alas o 111 W.4.d.. Bawd hog= • gaol d al Jiit Oa.iq Igo earl .w.., wall wlmaw 1. ag..., or boson Alt jams and ...awria 4....tve ow awl. m 4:01016.33., Fitter. 9. Root Jack o be 114 • - 21 gang•, lyp. B. Mg. h. id a wg0d..e with the • rent sleek ...ufaorav'. .poei6ad'ow .d the .p..dlu.ima of 0. Neel De.. I.199•244 Pookmoallogrpoirsageralla309.padablowastd. ' to. Addb may 4.v. la M 041.4 at a.ed.niul wilts. Verily with II. Verify l da..n6u with uchimtwal gawks... • ';\ J•i ��� ��' P,EG15rri,C 1•NOrfS"1011A1 1 ENG•rF.Ea 7448 0 SAWF PAUL. MINNCSOTA SHEET nue map 18•-•017 • • • • 2proj'025SS Ent EXHIBIT # 7 PRELIMINARY GRADING, EROSION CONTROL & DRAINAGE PLAN EMERGENCY APPARATUS Lino Lakes, Minnesota 1 GOERTZ I ROOF DRAINMZ EXISTING II BUILDING 11 1 d t Its. eI I I' FINISHED FLOOR ELEV. 903.0 II a FlN ELISHED FLOOR 1 i1 EV. 903 0 a D u e a r 1P..v 'ma I U o. r Pte IN NMR S4.au e PROPOSED BUILDING oN7M 0AN • OU5n 10 N ROlaeD NOM / / /14 Tae NPRM M arNETEE MEP !AMC NAR41s1 WAIN / NOL -TEC - TO oueAa f 7770/71 EROSION CONTROL NOTES (1 PNQF 10 01AM ammo. INSTALL SET 510► FEMCE! et LOCATIONS 91004 100t00NK SET STOP FENCES NIL K MEWED NEN LOCAL COMMONS RONK (21 MONK 045'4 TWICE Am. ND WEN ANOIO S3 MN A SWEET SET OSC MINN l0 DAYS OF FINAL /Far (7) ~INN me REPAIR 5L1 S1O0 COKES (NEWER 5E REIM* OE ACCIMIA.A ED StT) IMTA VEETA71O4 N ESTAQ/91ED. IN tNE 4.007 SEED NE 260 ML/OR 3*-E FOR THE R05114T10N AO[A NRR •• fte • - weft. SILT FENCE 0075 THE CENTRA01*. Al N5 OATEN NAY 9/0505/75 A GEO7517110 /ARNC. SPEC ]000 FOR THE CRINVLAR GEAR 0010041 MESS O0p0NSE SPEC/RD et TfE PLIES. M FAME SOLED 074.11 INC ANA Or Of RIPRIV A/N (47E7O LEDER 5E C4ANAT APROF 2 FEE7. GRAPHIC SCALE n le (GI Fes) I INN. 00 FL /N N O047N0 UTILITIES 1) The Information +1010 oA D,OM *wanes concerning (0. and 000474 of exiting MAN. h n04 guaranteed to ee accura. or 700 Iuanl... The con1ro01• %. mooed* for nwk1g nh warn d0rmbe4bn es to IM tine and location 04 utANts as may be neunory to Nola dae.g• le 07.00• WORN. 2) TN Contract*/ yes be r0sone1N for *FAUN .40My lecollon0. Zell Goanar 5101. One A (651) 454 -0002 for loadbnw CONIRACTCR SHALL FIELD NMI", LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTLITIES IMO NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY O15CREPANCES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. NOTE` SPOT ELEVAIIOIS SHORN ME /NIL N4OLIS SURFACE CR GUTTER UME UNLESS OTLERINSE NOTED. 500 ALL 5471400 DRAINAGE AREA; NCLUCSNO SWI.LR AROI D 5701 SEVER FLARED DID SECTIONS AND CIF STREET CA104 DAWNS. 900075 COIrERUC1*11 ttie 107111 UM ILE 1311075 Ill! 5644* teal ('Hee) 766 -1960 1 VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1. Apollo Business Park Anoka County, Minnesota NOTES: X 3) Denotes Existing Spot Elevation X 910.6 Denotes Proposed Spot Elevation Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage Denotes Proposed Contour Denotes Existing Contour —+j— Denotes Silt Fence 975 MAMMY ETICel M PLONEEM2.45551Piti AC gem MI -1.0047 DJM LCIMMIOV NOW ME OE7L leer MI 0/F.MY' A DATE: 3/04/D2 C1 • Memorandum EXHIBIT # g DATE: June 6, 2002 TO: Mike Grochala FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Emergency Apparatus Maintenance A site plan review of the submitted documents including a grading and erosion control plan dated April 29, 2002, seven -page preliminary plan dated April 4, 2002, RCWD permit dated July 2, 1996, RCWD submittal dated March 7, 2002, and received on June 3, 2002. Previously submitted was a RCWD permit dated March 21, 2002. The following comments must be addressed prior to a recommendation given for this site: Watermain: - Existing hydrants must be located. Sanitary Sewer: - Existing sanitary manholes must be located. Street Standards: - Street drainage must be maintained. Storm Sewer /Grading: We are in the process of reviewing revisions to the storm sewer and grading plan dated April 4, 2002, and received June 3, 2002. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 • Fax: 651 -982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 • • • AGENDA ITEM 5B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz/Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: June 12, 2002 TOPIC: Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit Russian Baptist Church, west of Baldwin Lake Road and north of Ash Street (Co. Rd. J) ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The City has received an application for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit for Russian Baptist Church. The proposed site is in the far southwestern corner of the City, west of Baldwin Lake Road and north of Ash Street. The property, which is 4.6 acres in size, is zoned Rural. Since churches are listed as a Conditional Use in a Rural Zone, a Conditional Use Permit has also been applied for. The Russian Baptist Church currently has approximately 180 members. The church is now renting space in Spring Lake Park for their meetings and parish needs, and has applied for a Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit in order to construct a church of their own. ANALYSIS Land Use Compatibility The following chart identifies the existing land use and zoning surrounding the proposed site: Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP Direction Land Use Zoning Site Low Density, Sewered Residential Rural North Low Density, Sewered Residential Rural East Low Density, Sewered Residential Rural South Residential (Shoreview) Residential (Shoreview) West Residential (Circle Pines) Residential (Circle Pines) The City's proposed 2001 Land Use Plan guides the subject site as Low Density, Sewered Residential (one to 2.5 units per acre). While the 2001 Plan is not yet officially adopted, it does reflect the long -range goals of the community related to existing and future land use. Site Description The site is a 4.6 -acre lot fronting Ash Street (County Road J). The northern half of the property is wooded, with a wetland in the northwest quarter. The Southern half of the property is largely open grassland. The west border of the property abuts the rear lot lines of residential homes along Indian Hills Drive in Circle Pines. The northern border abuts the back half of a property located on Baldwin Lake Road in Lino Lakes. The east border of the property abuts the rear lot lines of three homes also along Baldwin Lake Road, as well as a neighboring home on Ash Street. To the south, across Ash Street in Shoreview, are residential homes. Zoning /Conditional Use Permit The Site is zoned Rural. Churches are listed as a Conditional Use in such a district with the following provisions: 1. Side yard setbacks shall not be less than fifty (50) feet. 2. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with the landscape and screening regulations of Section 3 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Adequate off -street parking and access is provided on the site...and such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section 3, subd. 4.S of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Adequate off - street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where applicable by Section 3, subd. 6 of this ordinance. • Additionally, under Section 2, subd. 2.B.7 of the City Zoning Ordinance, any issued Conditional Use Permits must meet the following standards: Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood of the City. 2. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and/or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. 4. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. 5. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 6. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 7. Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. 8. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. 9. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. The proposed site and use appear to comply with the above - described provisions and standards. Building Issues Proposed construction includes 15,920 total square feet of building over three levels: • Main Level: 7,438 square feet (sanctuary and related uses) • Lower Level: 7,438 square feet (classrooms, fellowship area and kitchen facilities) • Upper Level: 1,044 square feet (storage and child/parent room) Plans also show a 60' X 50' footprint to the north of the proposed church, to be used as a future expansion area. Any future expansion will require a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review. The exterior of the building will include brick facing /apron and vinyl siding, with a proposed 45 -foot steeple. No bells are proposed at this time. Asphalt shingles will cover the roof. There is neither water nor sewer available for the site. Plans indicate a proposed drain field north of the church, with adequate room for a secondary drain field site. Soils tests confirm that the site can adequately support a septic system. As building code requires a 3 • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP sprinkler system for this building, and the site has no public water available, a holding tank for fire suppression purposes will be required. Design of the sprinkler system will be reviewed as part of the building permit application, but design specifications will be required prior to City Council review. Public Services The site is located in a Phase 1 Growth Area. Although there are no immediate plans for City sewer and water services to be installed, it is possible that they will be available in the Phase 1 Growth Area by 2010. City services may also be available via the City of Shoreview, however the church has informed staff that they have no plans to pursue utilities through either Circle Pines or Shoreview. Parking/Access /Traffic City Ordinance requires one parking space for each four seats in a church. There are 360 seats show in the main assembly hall, which would then require 90 parking stalls. Plans for the church show 99 parking stalls. Although there are additional classrooms and fellowship areas in the lower level of the church, these areas are not expected to be used by adults concurrently with the main assembly hall. As a result, the parking stall estimates generated from the number of seats in the main assembly hall appear to be adequate for church needs. Plans indicate an area to the northeast of the proposed church to be used for additional parking should the church choose to expand. This area would contain 33 additional stalls. The Environmental Board has recommended use of green parking in future parking expansion areas, as well as an increase in the use of infiltration and storm water practices around parking areas in general. Access is off Ash Street, a County road. As a result, plans have been submitted to the Anoka County Highway department for review. Plans show a two -lane, 24 -foot wide driveway entrance to the site off Ash Street. There has been no traffic generation study conducted. Setbacks The following chart indicates the required and proposed setbacks for the site: Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP Setback Required Proposed Principle Building — front/from street 40 feet (for arterial roads) 40 feet Principle Building — side yard 50 feet (for CUP requirements) 50 feet Principle Building — rear yard 30 feet + 30 feet Parking — front/from street 15 feet 30 feet Parking — side yard 15 feet 15 feet Parking — rear yard 10 feet + 10 feet Lighting A photometric plan has been submitted, along with fixture details. Lighting will be no- spill, with meter readings within City requirements (< 1 foot candle for streets; < 0.4 foot candle for abutting residential property). Landscaping The proposed church would exist as a conditional use within a Rural zone. City Ordinance directs that such conditional uses provide "adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping...in compliance with Sec. 3.subd.4.S." City Ordinance specifically directs buffering/screening in the form of "either a fence or green belt planting strip." The applicant has elected to construct a fence for screening purposes, and City Ordinance requires "such a fence shall provide a solid screening effect six feet in height." Staff recommends a condition requiring that such a fence be extended to the north to screen all proposed and future parking expansion areas, as current plans do not show the proposed fence extending along the entire area of parking. In addition, the applicant has provided some additional landscaping in an attempt to soften the effect of the fence, as City Ordinance directs "exposed fences shall run a maximum length of fifty feet between landscaping areas or clusters" (Sec. 3.subd. 4.S.5.e.2.b). At this time plans show the fence located on the lot line, with landscaping located on the church side of the fence. The current landscape plan shows some trees within ponding and drain field areas and the Environmental Board has recommended such trees be moved to appropriate areas. The Board also recommends consideration of alternate tree species choices, which are described in the attached memo from Environmental Specialist Marty Asleson. In addition, the Board has recommended that a tree inventory and tree preservation plan be submitted for the site. 5 • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP Trash Enclosure /Screening Plans show a 13' X 10' trash enclosure located at the northern end of the parking area. The enclosure is 6' -8" high and constructed of concrete block painted to match the principle building color. Signage No signage plans have yet been submitted. The Lino Lakes Sign Ordinance limits institutional signage in the Rural zone in the following ways: maximum of 32- square feet of signage area; a maximum of 8 feet high; no closer than 10 feet to any property line. Parks & Trail There will be no park dedication fee required. There are no trails planned for the north side of Ash Street. Grading/Drainage /Wetland There are a number of engineering issues that remain incomplete or unresolved, per City Engineer Jim Studenski; the memo dated June 7, 2002, details these concerns and is attached to this report. All engineering issues are to be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to any City Council review. Rice Creek Watershed District has issued a TWAFFA for this project, pending completion of five administrative items. Environmental Board Recommendations The Environmental Board reviewed this application at their May 29, 2002, meeting and recommended approval with some changes; the Memo from Marty Asleson dated June 6, 2002, details these changes and is attached to this report. In general, recommended changes center around the following: 1.) Submit a tree inventory and tree preservation plan. 2.) Increase infiltration and storm water practices, particularly around parking areas. 3.) Alter tree choices, and move some trees out of water infiltration areas. 4.) Use of green parking in future parking expansion areas. CONCLUSION Staff recommends approval of the application, with the following conditions: 1.) Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction. • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Russian Baptist Church Site Plan Review & CUP 2.) Permits be obtained by Rice Creek Watershed prior to any site work or building permit issuance. 3.) Fencing shall extend to the north to buffer all proposed and future parking expansion areas. 4.) Any signage must comply with the City's Sign Ordinance. 5.) Any future expansion shall require Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit Amendment. 6.) A tree inventory, tree preservation plan, and revised landscape plan are to be reviewed by the City's Environmental Specialist. All trees shown placed in ponding or drain field areas are to be moved to more suitable areas. 7.) The City Engineer shall review and approve all necessary grading, utility, and drainage plans: issues identified in the memo dated May 1, 2002, from City Engineer Jim Studenski are to be resolved to his satisfaction prior to City Council review. 8.) Design specifications for the fire suppression system will be required prior to City Council review. 9.) A performance agreement shall be prepared, including financial securities, and executed prior to City Council review. OPTIONS 1.) Recommend approval of the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit, with conditions. 2.) Recommend denial of the Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit. 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1 ATTACHMENTS 1.) General Location Map 2.) Site Plan 3.) Certificate of Survey 4.) Site & Utility Plan 5.) Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan 6.) Landscape Plan 7.) Lighting Plan 8.) Floor Plan Details 9.) Elevation Plans 10.) City Engineer Memo, Dated June 7, 2002 11.) City Environmental Specialist Memo, Dated June 6, 2002 rk EXHIBIT # / T, \Vf 21 [p fT BACH STRF-ET GE on win vx. tr* Sy it ate; ����N s ©dui _ i �ema i�sa©a a . f imustm9Gn 44:p 4 ''Ll'm rili3/41 3AOa 11 NO. 25 S OF CITY C a' R NO. 98. NOKA OUNTY S RVEY• R DRAWN REVISED REV, REV. REV. REV. REV. SEP. 1974 NOV. 1978 MAR.1980 SEP. 1981 DEC .1982 JULY 1985 DEC. 1985 REVISED JAN. 987 REV. MAY 988 REV. . REV. FEB. 989 1 99 REV. FEB. 992 REV. FEB. 993 REV. MAY 994 SCALE 1'1=1500' REVISED REV.. REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. NOV. 1994 JAN. 1996 JULY 1997 JULY 1998 AUG. 1999 SEPT. 2000 0 1/4 1/ 3/4 VICINITY MAP SCALE: NOT TO SCALE BACKFILL W/ NEW 6000 QUALITY TOPSOIL & SEED NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ^�.ti lei ee. +r - } 4 • ti�xv Ci 1:4;i.1 •?'T7'. tip 8.,f• . J`is:�l.:sc 41�`1�"^54ia" 44; EXISTING -/ SUBGRADE SOIL t-I I IT -Ill -i 1 rl! CLASS 5 BASE AGGREGATE B6 -12 CONCRETE CURB DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 8" e rl ON STALLS ADJACENT TO 8' -0" AISLES ONLY ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN SCALE: 1" - 1' -0" 13' -4" /.SLI/ / //O /� 15 5" CONC. SLAB ON GRADE I 5" COMPACTED CLASS 5 BAST I 14 BARS 0 W/ 14 VERT. BENT OWELS "INTO FTC "-CONCRETE APRON 0 io INVERTED LINTEL BLOCK TOP COURSE B" CONC. BLK. PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING CONCRETE SLAB AND APRON R U S S I A N B A P T I S T C H U R C H ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN SEE DTI.. 3/A1 a A 4 9. -0. • 0 4 d 8' -0" 8' -O" ACCESSIBLE CURB CUT SCALE: 1/8" - 1' -0" HINGE BY GATE SUPPUER VERT. CEDAR GATE W/ CEDAR LATCH 12' -0" WIDE x 5' -6" HIGH 12 "1116" CONC. FTG. W /(2) /5's CONT. TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN 5 "8 STEEL BOLLARD III GROUTED SOLID IN BLOCK I I CORE FOR GATE MOUNTING I� AND ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/4" • 1' -0" 8' -0" W LINE OF THE SWI /4 OF THE SW1 /4_...3 OF SEC. 31,T,31,R,22 r S 88'29'53" E 340.00 io 1 ' DRAINFIELJ1 c9 hI EXPAN90I•{ Z _ III I!I SECONDARIYI PAR 13' -KI N0 "G / I DRAINFIELD I 1 FU TURE I SETBACK 1 I -41 I EXPANSON E __ _. SEE STRUCT. 1 l I BLp . iETBACK 120-0 , WI ?I I ,� I PROPOSED BUILDING III I a i I I 15.497 S.F. 0 -OOF SADDLE I I I al -- 3_I.EV€LS -_� 3 4 Er KONG SLIDEWJALK 11\ 3, -0. 1 15 ill / SETBACK 8 A x I B6 -12 CURB 1 ; Nk GUTTER 508 Y 9' 8- 8 B 8' 8- 87; o. 1 r 1 1- t_ F'17PON PLAVERIFY W/ 0 L NS AI r'TTI-I-rrT'1-I- I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I L- I TRASH ENCLOSURE _ }} SEE 4/91 T-- U.C. WATER RESEVOIR FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEM VERIFY SIZE AND LOC'N W/ SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR 12 131 PARKING FOR FUTURE EXPANSION I ni 1- 1IlL n I r T II n I ILI a I II 1 18 15' 6' -0" HIGH OPAOUE FENCE 113.00 N 8879 53" 6' -0" HIGH OPAQUE FENCE PROPOSED NELL LOCATION VERIFY W/ CONTRACTOR 2/A1 15' 18' 24'1 24' 1 14, 5' -0" -J _- zx, < omin °nab Eve S' cu o PP N 4 ANOKA CO. HWY. R -0- PLAT N0. 48 , i C O M M E R C I A L P L A N R E V I E W F O R C O D E C O M P L I A N C E A. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Nome: Russion BWlist Church Project Location: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Lot Sue: 4.61 Acres 200,766 ,I. Zoning And Lond Use Rural District (C.P.U.) Hard Surloce Coverage: 48.926 s,1./200,786 s.l. • 24.48 Green Spoof Coverage: 151,860 .1/200,786 sl. - 75.68 Building Coverage 7,436 ,.f./200,786 8..f. - 3.70 B. APPLICABLE CODES: I. Uniform Building Code 2. Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance 3. Minnesota Slate Building Code 4. Minnesota Disabilities Code 5. Minnesoto Plumbing Code 6. Minnesota Eleclrk5 code NEC 7. Minnesota Energy Conservation Code 8. Uniform Fre Cade 9. Minnesota Fire Code 10. Minnesota H.V.A.C. & R. Code 11. Uniform Mechanical Code 12. Elevator Safety Code C. OCCUPANCY GROUP (lurch - 15,487 s.f. (UBC 304) Group A2.1 1997 Edition (UBC 1997) Current Edition 1998 Edition 1999 Edition 1998 Edition 1999 Edition 1999 -2000 Edition 1997 Edition 1998 Edition 1998 Edition 1991 Edition 1999 Edition D. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION A2.1 Type V 1 How Fuey Sprin1dered in compliance with UBC slondard 9 -1 and 9 -2 (Sprinkler Conceded Spaces) E. BUILDING AREA, HEIGHT Toted Square Feel: 7,436 .l. + 1,062 sl. Upper Level • 8,498 .1. With 6,989 1.1. Baseme two F. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT AND BUILDING AREA EXHIBIT # ,- L A M P E R T ARCH I T E C T S 13837 NE Lincoln Street - Horn Lake. MN 55304 MI PNene:713.7S3.1211 90x:763.757.2549 I.,np•Satanpml- arcn <am ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: 1 WREST 1SRTe1r NAT 7NIS PLAN. SPE011CATn0I1 OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY YE OR UNDER MY ERECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY UCENSE0 ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF NE STATE OF MINNESOTA "CNAMAC LEONARD LAMPERT WOO' NAME LICENSE NO. 1. Allowable Height (UBC 505. 506, Table 5 -8) 50' -0" 2 Stories 2. Proposed. Height - 45' -O" - 0 Steeple 3. Allowable Areo - A2.1 Type V 1 How 10,500 S.F. x Seporotion (UBC 505) 4 sides 1008 • 21,000 S.F. 21,000 S.F. + Multi Story Approved Sprinkler System (UBC 505.3) 2008 • 42,000 S.F. 4. keo Check - 8,498/42,000 • 20.2%<1008 G. OCCUPANCY SEPARATION (UBC 302.4) Not Required H. AREA SEPARATION (UBC 504.6.4) Not Required 1. FIRE RESISTIVE RATINGS (UBC TABLE 6 -A) 1. Exterior Bearing Woes 2. Weise Beorng Walls 3. Exterior Non - bearing Wills 4. Structural Frame 5. Permanent Porlilians 6. Shoff Enclosure 7. Flows And Floor Ceilings 8. Roofs d Roo' C dugs 9. Exterior Doors And Windows Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hour Hew Hour Not Permitted Less Than 5 Feel, Protected Less Than 10 Feet. J. OCCUPANCY LOAD (UBC TABLE 10 -A) Sooting Copecity • 375 Occupont Load - 713 As Staled On Floor Pion K. EXITING I. Number Of Exits (UBC 1004.2.3) 710<1,000 0conponts • 3 Required. 4 Provided • 15' -0" PKG. 2. Distance To Exits (UBC 1004.2.5) SETBACK Less Than 250' -0" 3. Corridor Width (UBC 1004.3.4) 44" Al Occupancy Lood Creole Then 49 4, Arrangement 01 Exits (UBC 1004.I.4) Not Less Than 1/2 Oiogond Overall Building Dimensions 5. Exit 1150th (UBC 1003.2.3) Mn. Clear Width 32" Per Door 6. Door Width (UBC 1003.3.1.3) AI Exit Doors Are 14n. 3' -0" In 16dth 7. Door Swing (UBC 1003.3.1.5) Doors Swing out Were Required B. Type 01 Lock Or latch (UBC 1003.31.8) Openoble From Inside Without Use 01 A Key. 9. Exit Or Exit Access Doors Shall Not Be Prodded 1511. A Latch Or Lock Unless It Is Panic Hardee. (1007.2.5) 10. Manually Operated Edge - Or - Surface - Mounted Flush Bolls And Surface Bolts Or Any Device Used L. OTHER 1. Building Is Accessble 2. Rool Access (MSBC 1300.4500) Not Required 3. Root Hatch (MSBC 1300.4500) Not Required 4. Draft Stops (08C 708.3) Required See Plon For Notes And Location 5. Recycling Spoce - Exterior Trost, Enclosure 6. An Approved Fie Alarm System Shill Be Installed (U.B.C. 303.9) 7. Aud41e And K;,01 Alarms 9141 Be Provided (44.5.8.0. 1341.0472) M. PLUMBING FIXTURES - INCLUDING ACCESSIBLE (UBC APP. CHPT 29) Required Provided 11 1 IV 2 4 2 6 4 1 2 4 4 1 I Based On Occuponls 1. Water Closets 2. Urinals 3. lavatories 4. Fountains 5. Service Sink PARKING I. Church: 375 Seats 0 1/4 Seats 2. Told Parking Required - 94 Spaces • 94 Spaces 3. Told Parking Provided Stoll Ste Striping - 4" 191ite Stripes AVEMENT DESIGN: 1. AU Parking Areas 1 1/2" Bituminous Wear Course MN. 0.0.T. 2331 Type 41 2" Bituminous Binder Course MN. D.O.T. 2331 Type 31 6" Compacted Class 5 Base MN. D.O.T. 3138 2. Verily With Existing Soo Conditions And Adjust Accordingly ASH STREET (C.S.A.H. NO. 32) 1 -- 227.00 N 88'29'53" W S, UNE OF THE SW1 /4 OF THE SW1 4 OF SEC. 31 T 31 R 22 ANOKA CO. MONUMENT AT THE SW CORNER OF SEC. 31 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" • 40' -0" NORTH • 99 Spaces • 9' X 18' Stolle U r 'O LL 2 O t 1:13 LV co I- W co 1..V c Lino Lakes, Minnesota Drown By ECO Checked By LL. LML Revisions 04.08.02 04.22.02 05.10.02 CITY SUBMITTAL PRELIMINARY DWGS 0TY SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN CODE REVIEW DETAILS Sheet Number Al Project No. 010606 -4 • Certificate of Survey for: Russian Baptist Church Fr 'srs- x" ...601.36-100... J.L. IN.00 400,01 CAINE & ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYORS, INC. A 3A301M0 Q 413_414p510. 110. 14Fa. -144 00* —..y ...r M. •.b. is •1. .�, 0041.. •.olf w D.0101 laNthip 0164 Oevolu *Mg InNt *lot 0 I rAtra ftte. a ��••- ••—��� 0..00. Mill .4..O.M s 4.10.4.4 b C•,m. •.ls... 0••bl, 4 EXHIBIT # 3 > 0• 0001 00100 fool I .W.1 000 300,00 M M a. wrt NY.00 MO M Y. 1..4.W Os.e. 0 V. $00000 1th 1. 4.04 4 3..mn x .00 700■00 — 71.. o. I04 ww• 4 .041 . t 44 .0« *amino w ..1M 0Km tart M 44 wort 11100 tart 0 44 a1 041.0 fort 0 M wl •Ka0 tart M ..Y y..1.1 * Owls, M M. 0.Rw4 0u.gr. Y031 b C...ry 000 J (Ai 3000. 4a Mum 00.41 • 30 to 0'4181404 -J0 ray w • 00101. 1041 mamma moo 0 COO10 4/2 0101 RO1 4K OR 1,14._74_1 .-.. 31_.31_11 • • C2000 RLK- Kuusi,tu, LTD. SITE NOTES • DIMENSIONS ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO BACK OF CURB BUILDING DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO OUTSIDE OF BUILDING FACE CURB RA011 IS 5 FEET TO THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. CONSTRUCTION NOTES • CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE CURB ANO GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AC C4RDING TO MnOOT 2531. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE 8 -612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CLASS 5 SHALL BE EXTENDED 6• BEYOND THE BACK OF CURB. • CLEARING AND GRUBBING ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO 14n00T 2105. • TOPOGRAPHY COSTING TOPOGRAPHY PRONDED BY RUC-CAINE m ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYORS. INC_ UTILITY NOTES • SPECIFICATIONS ALL U11U11ES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCOROING TO THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOOATION OF MINNESOTA (CEA.1) SPECFICATIONS • CATCHBASNS AND MANHOLES CATCH BASINS ANO MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE BUMPED 0.05 FEET. CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS L 30.0' d / • • / 1 i — - - . ,/ I / I ' II /' ', 1 )1' ^i i i r ; e -5 /r i J / P --- r is AP..K NC'4P:ifi �/ �:4. i �L }T:WE. E;1,*'AFi-..Ctt4 ir/ 2._. -_ / - 18.0'•I- 8 -8 60.0 i 01 i r 120.0' BFE 892.0 B -2 FFE 903.0 GO 4- 9.0' ij i '`i ;1 A 28.0' 24.0' L , U•i•• 0. .RUom t2 n R •O• / 15' U.C. WATER RESEVO1R FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEM VERIFY 5120 ANO LOCATION WITH SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR PROPOSED WELL. WELL DRILLER 10 VERIFY LOCA11ONS AND MEET ALL APPLICABLE CODES. t. 1,/lb+7. i1lt� /'a 1 1 -24.0' I Y....- f• ASH STREET (C.S.A.H. NO. 32) Coll EXHIBIT # Twin 1AN. BEN BRASS DISK IN SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE LOCATED ON COUNTY ROAD J EAST OF LEXINGTON AVENUE CROSSING RICE CREEK. (ANOKA COUNTY) ELEV.= 886.559 SPIKE IN POWER POLE LOCATED 525' NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD J ON BALDWIN LAKE ROAD. (ORGN UNKNOWN) 89581 LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE PROPERTY UNE CURB UNE — - SANITARY SEWER/ MANHOLE WATERMAJN FIRE HYDRANT __ _t— FIRE HYDRANT w/ AUX. VALVE GATE VALVE CATCH BASIN /STORM SEWER/MANHOLE »- -� FLARED END SECTION W/ RIP RAP 0 30 NORT 60 90 SCALE IN FZ.T 0 0 v to- W 0 D U a Y w x U F 030 m- ix Z= QV V) CC CC Z SITE & UTIUTY PLAN 0 2000 RLK- Kuuanto, LTD. FINISHED GRADE I 1/2" BIT. WEARING COURSE, MnOOT SPEC. 2331, TYPE 41 TACK COAT, MnOOT SPEC. 2357 2" 811. BASE COURSE. MnDOT SPEC. 2331, TYPE 31 6" ACC. BASE. CLASS 5 MnDOT SPEC 2211 COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS APPROVED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NORMAL SECTION (DESIGN BY AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING. NC.I BENCHMARK BRASS DISK IN SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE LOCATED ON COUNTY ROAD J EAST OF LEJONGTON AVENUE CROSSING RICE CREEK. (ANOKA COUNTY) ELEV.- 886.559 SPIKE IN POWER POLE LOCATED 525' NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD J ON BALDWIN LAKE ROAO. (ORIGIN UNKNOWN) ELEV.= 893.81 GRADING, TURF ESTABUSHMENT & EROSION CONTROL NOTES • TURF ESTABUSHMENT ALL TURF ESTABUSHMENT SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnOOT 2575 ANO SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE COMPLETED GRADING OPERATION. • TOPSOIL CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP. STOCKPILE AND RE- SPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 4 INCH DEPTH (COMPACTED) TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS, TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. SEEDING (INFILTRATION PONDS) 5EE0 MIX SHALL BE MnDOT 268 AT 100/ PER ACRE. • SEEDING (ALL ELSE) SEED MIX SHALL BE MnDOT 509 AT 100# PER ACRE DORMANT SEEDING AFTER NOVEMBER 1, AT TWICE THE NORMAL RATE • SOD SCO SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 3878. • MULCHING MULCH SHALL BE MnDOT TYPE 1. STRAW SHOULD BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE AND ANCHORED WITH 0411108 NETTING OR A STRAIGHT DISC. • FERTIUZER TYPE 20 -0-10 AT 400# PER ACRE. • EROSION CONTROL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL AREAS ALTERED ON THE SITE HAVE BEEN RESTORED. • GRADING ALL GRADING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 2105. AFTER SUBSTANTIAL TURF ESTABLISHMENT, ALL SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL PONDS. • EROSION CONTROL CONTACT PERSON DAN TORGERSON 19222 STAPLES ST NE EAST BETHEL, MN 55011 763 -413 -0042 CONSTRUCTION NOTES • CONCRETE CURB ANO GUTTER CONCRETE CURS AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO MnDOT 2531. CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER SHALL BE B -612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CLASS 5 SHALL BE EXTENDED 6" 9010813 THE BACK OF CURB. • CLEARING AND GRUBBING ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 2105. • TOPOGRAPHY EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY RLK -CHINE & ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYORS, INC.. • WETLAND DELINEATION WETLAND DELINEATION BY EARTH SCIENCE ASSOC.. INC. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING DURATION INSTALL SILT FENCE 2 DAYS STRIP SZE 3 DAYS GRADE SITE TO SUBGRADE 2 WEEKS INSTALL UT1UTIES 2 WEEKS CONSTRUCT BUILwNG 2 MONTHS PAVE PARKING AREAS 1 WEEK STRIPE PARKING AREAS 1 DAY VEGETATE GREEN AREAS 1 4000 PROJECT DURATION 3 MONTHS INF1L1R 110N .j., .r r}� 1 1 I / / / / 1 1 ■ J 1 /{/ � r-"2 LJ 11_ SILT SIFE 596 - T�rZ- ="" f"' 1 �1 IJ 1'1 I 1\1 I I I I I V I I I I I I I I/ 1 /1 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 / B -5 / PARKING tOR / FUTURE EXPANSION \—;4901- I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 e:I tA3 O 90' -18' RCP CL3 0 1.40 CERAM • W/MnDOT 40201 R3250A RE =89�Q IE(15 ") :890.48 1E081 =8906 140-15" RCP CL5 0 1.40 ��_ 0814H2 TI 48-0 W/'UnDOT 48)204 Q q COVER, R3250A `I CASTING /'.. RE =901.0 E�89222 140' -15" RCP CL5 0 1.40 — - 902,..— —O\ Q� 08MH3� 48"• W/MnDOT 40201 ✓/ COVER, 832504 /o CASTING RE =901.70 10- 894.18 125' -15" RCP CL5 0 1.30 900 >. Y r 995 Drainage igifialikn&RSorofeT 595 8? 902 '• ^ r M ~A•� P P ASH STREET (C.S.A.H. NO. 32) • (W8Nnnun sea.) ( SILT FENCE (SEE DETAIL) I I GRAVEL ENTRANCE 11 I (SEE DETAIL) / ) I I/ e' 9Rwd 0'196•+•7 _ - 4- CLNCRETE —DRIVE APRON Cal EXHIBIT # Twin MN. GRAVEL ENTRANCE ELM wNSROCT CHAN EL 10 Duo. 80040 ADA15,I (T UP 10 391.70 1/2 "R .3/4 3 "R. 11 ER FT v.,' • 'o 1-5/8 I 12 8612 CURB & GUTTER a" 1 /2 "1. metal or wood stake., ,engineering Fabric / as speciFied Fabric anchorage trench / bockfIll trench with \ tamped natural soil SILT FENCE DETAIL WA(2Cr•, l ri$ 3NLNtsrRiReR®Nw 54060 4-A 8401919 B-9 3/S•M• STAP9F55 51E0. RUNNER PM 3/It•d STRAALS WM. THEAT1 AVM ANCNON r ON mown 2114.01/4• CAST NCH CRAWS. TREATED r•r UINBD0 TO REACH CE€ ITAIED NX E109AIIO91 TIE41U 912 PLANKS 8760AP PLAN O AT .29(15 AND NIL 9610 CALVIN® WAS Y OSP= 8 -09.99 r.4• CAST nw CHANNEL CROWED 016 WOO.. COAT CAST 1X0411 96 0311TACT 9619 GROUT 9610 2 COATS 0' 88088943 PANT. CALVAM60 GRATE (NUT) 4•.e. OPENNW TREATED 912 8.900. OWIAP MAWS AT an MD NAL 96144 09L99J 3D NHL. C ORIFICE OUTLET CONTROL. STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE LEGEND ROPOS D EXISTING 0— N —0 RIGHT -OF -WAY UNE PROPERTY UNE CURB UNE DEUNIATED WETLAND CATCH BASIN /STORM SEWER/MANHME FLARED END SECTION W/ RIP RAP TOPOGRAPHICAL CONTOUR UNE DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE SLOPE SILT FENCE GRADING UMITS — WE1LANO 0 30 60 90 61 SCALE IN Lt l oti 0 =a tt 5 Tut a £ E O, 8g� 8'S o _405 2 z 0 0: 1 1 O U CC W U W to Q z Q_ z - < N W CO 40 Z M J co 1V) N-r az W0• • ce'6i OU i z2 <O'5 (� W LANDSCAPE N0165: -ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS TO BE PROVIDED WITH AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM. - PROVIDE MULCH AND EDGER STRIP 0 ALL SHRUBBERY PLANTING LOCATIONS. -FOUR (4) INCHES OF BLACK DIRT SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL LANDSCAPE SITUATIONS AND BE THOROUGHLY TILLED INTO THE SUB GRADE TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF SEVEN (7) INCHES. -ALL NEW PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWELVE (12) MONTHS FROM THE TIME CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE ALIVE, OF GOOD QUALITY, AND DISEASE FREE AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD OR BE REPLACED. ANY REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR TWELVE (12) MONTHS FROM IHE TIME OF PLANTING OR A LETTER OF CREDIT AN0 /OR CASH ESCROW IN LIEU OF A WARRANTY. PLANTING SCHEDULE QTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE MTHD REMARKS 3 A GREEN ASH FRAXINUS PATMORE 2.5" BB ELYMUS TRACHYCAULUS 6 B SUGAR MAPLE ACER SACCHARUM 2.5" BB 34.0 2 C FLOWERING CRAB MALIUS SPECIES 2" 8B BLUESTEM, LITTLE 4 0 SPRING SNOW CRAB MAUUS SPECIES 2" BB TOTAL: 23 E GREEN SPRUCE PICEA GLAUCA 6' BB 18 F COMMON LILACS SYRINGA VULGARIS V2 CONT. 12 G GOLD FLAME SPIREA SPIRACA JAPONICA 12 CONT. MIXED W/ N 12 N VARIEGATED DOGWOOD CORUS ELEGANTISSIMA 02 CONT. MIXED W/ G MIXTURE 15A MODIFIED (15B) -MESIC TALL GRASS PRAIRIE COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME % OF MIX 816651EM BIG ANDROPOGEN GERARDI 5.0 DRAMA, SIDEOATS BOUTELOUA CURTIPENDULA 10.0 WILD RYE, CANADIAN ELYMUS CANADENSIS 5,0 WHEAT CRASS, SLENDER ELYMUS TRACHYCAULUS 5.0 RYE GRASS, ANNUAL LOLIUM ITAUCUM 10.0 REGREEN NA 34.0 FORBS(TABLE F-I,F-2 OR F -3) NA 5.0 SWITCH GRASS PAICUM NRGATUM 2.0 BLUESTEM, LITTLE SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 12.0 INDIAN GRASS SORCHASTRUM NUTANS 12.0 TOTAL: 100.0 RATE: 30LBS /ACRE (33KG /HA) DESCRIPTION: NATIVE MIX. REACHES A HEIGHT OF 36 TO 48 INCHES. EXCELLENT FOR USE ON ALL SOIL TYPES. FOR USE IN OAK SAVANNA AND PRAIRIE REGIONS OF THE STATE. l 18" MIN. 4 3" LAYER WOOD CHIP MULCH 11.186 BACK BURLAP SAUCER PLANTING SOIL WITH FERRUZER REMOVE WIRE AND PLASTIC SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 1" - 40' -0" TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 1" - 40' -0" MAINTAIN TREES NATURAL FORM BY PRUNING BRANCHES FLUSH WITH BARK PRUNE FOLIAGE ONE THIRD DO NOT CUT LEADERS STAKING AT CONTRACTORS OPTION PAPER TREE WRAP SHALLOW MULCH NEAR TRUNK (1 INCH) MULCH DEPTH 4 " -6 ", 12" FROM TRUNK MULCH TAPERS TO 2 " -3" DEPTH 0 PERIMETER EXISRND CRAM GRADE PERIMETER CUT I " -2" DEEP TO HOLD MULCH PLANTING SOIL MIXED WITH MIN. 505 EXISTING 511E SOIL. ACHIEVE PROPER SOIL TEXTURE FOR TREE. IF UNKNOWN, MIX A SANDY LOAM SOIL. TO BE PLANTED - 3' -0" FROM AWAY PROPERTY LINE 1 5 8879'53" E 340.00 III ZNATIVE GRAS i S7 1 C r- 'T1 -I -1 1- TT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r r-- 11 I 1 I I I I I I TO BE PLANTED 3' -0" AWAY PROPERTY LINE h —_N I II II II 1 I4SI -� I I MULp1 I +R I I50¢ i PROPOSED BUILDING I FUTURE EXPANSION �, QI Zwrii%k rev ci 10,Trane "Win /V © • , 1210 10 '° MI 2 0 'loo 41) o. 6' -0" HIGH BD. ON B0. • OPAQUE FENCE 14> 6' -0" 6161-1 BD. ON BD. OPAQUE FENCE 3 qn m 50D SO. ASH STREET (C.S.A.H. NO. 32) 1 227.00 N 8879'53" W LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" - 40' -0" NORTH 3 EXHIBIT # (I Lino Lakes, Minnesota Drown By. ECO Checked By. LL, LAIL Revisions 04.08.02 04.22.02 05.10,02 CITY SUBMITTAL PRELIMINARY DWG5 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet Number L1 Project No. 010606 -4 SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND TYPE %1 TYPE SYMBOL QUANTITY ARRANGEMENT LUMENS LLF DESORPTION 2A E3E1 3 BACK-BA0( 25,000 0700 SPAULDNG PF1- 8250PS- SVS -FG 16 it 1 SINGLE 25,000 0.700 SPAULDING PFI- M250PS- III -FG 1A - 2 9893. 25,000 0.700 SPAULDING PF1- 6250P5- SVS -FG 0 19 lo 873 439 20 0 0 21 1b 822 359 20 0 LUMINAIRE LOCATION SUMMARY PROJECT: ALL PROJECTS SE0 N0. LABEL 0 Y Z ORIENT TILT 16 2o 806 210 25 90 0 12 lo 936 436 20 0 0 18 2o 715 212 25 90 0 19 lo 873 439 20 0 0 21 1b 822 359 20 0 0 STATISTICAL AREA SUMMARY PROJECT: ALL PROJECTS LABEL AVG. MAO MIN AVG/MIN MAX/MIN SOUTH LOT 1.96 3.9 0.6 3.27 7.77 NORTH LOT/ORM 1.41 3.8 0.2 7.05 7.57 1 I-L-C IYT TrI TJZ I JI.. I.I..I ..I .1 J 1 PARKING F(IR I.. - - PPITURE•EXBANn10M a--y (� IdJ L L(j „�. �I„ :: ria LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1' - 40' -0' NORTH NOTE: LIGHTING SHOWN FOR SCHEMATIC PURPOSES ONLY. UGHIING IS DESIGN-BUILO By ELECTRICAL CONTRATOR, VERIFY 9ZE, STYLE. OUANTITY AND LOCATION W/ OWNER AND CONTRACTOR. PROVIDE LIGHTING PHOTO METRICS IF NECESSARY AT CITYS REQUEST. EXHIBIT # .� Lino Lakes, Minnesota Drown By. ECO Checked By. 11, LML Revisions 05.09.02 05.10.02 PRELIMINARY 0W05 CITY SUBMITTAL LIGHTING PLAN Sheet Number L2 Project No. 010606 -4 17' -7 1/2" 8 66" 1416. 32" CLEAR I 30 "x48" nCLEAR FLOOR SPACE L 30"x48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE 30"x48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE 30"x48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE r SEE 7/A2 FOR DRINKING FOUNTAIN DETAILS 66" M4N. ,~- 30 "x48 ", 1 CLEAR 7 e FLOOR - SPACE 30148"-1 1 t CLEAR T FLOOR SPACE J 1'- NOTE: 27" - WALL MOUNTED TOILET 31" - FLOOR MOUNTED TOILET ENLARGED RESTROOM PLAN SCALE: 3/8" = 1' -0" LAVATORIES SHALL HAVE A CLEAR ACCESS WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN 30 ", CLEAR HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN 29" TO THFx BOTTOM OF THE FIXTURE APRON, CLEAR HEIGHT OF NOT MORE 34 TO THE RIM OF THE FIXTURE, AND A CLEAR DEPTH OF NOT LESS THAN 12" UNDER THE FIXTURE EXCLUSIVE OF BOWL AND WASTE PIPE. ALL EXPOSED PIPES ARE TO BE COVERED WITH AN INSULATED PROTECTIVE MATERIAL THE WATER CONTROL VALVES SHALL HAVE LEVER HANDLES RESTROOM ACCESSORIES NOTE: MIRRORS SHALL BE MOUNTED SO THAT THE BOTTOM IS NO HIGHER THAN 38" ABOVE THE FLOOR. ALL WALL - MOUNTED DISPENSERS, WASTE DISPOSAL CONTAINERS, OR SIMILAR ACCESSORIES SHALL BE MOUNTED SO THAT WORKING HEIGHT IS NO HIGHER THAN 38" ABOVE THE FLOOR, AND SHALL BE FREE OF INTERFERENCE BY CRAB BARS OR OTHER ACCESSORIES OR FIXTURES. GRAB BARS SHALL SUPPORT A WEIGHT OF 250 LB5. OR GREATER. 10• lo FUTURE o STORAGE 1 'r 13' -0" 11' -0" 0 Mifs' 5 I I •.. IN Wy .1 �/24 "x36 ATTIC 126 S.F. ° ACCESS - ANEL 1 OCC. © ". FINISHED FLOOR L. -109- 43" HIGH WALL SO W/ WOOD CAP Nom u— 1 moo one 1 nom, IIILB� MI i i�� m rOF,1 ST® 181 S.F. 1 OCC 19' -8" unoru UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/8" - 1' -0" UPPER LEVEL S.F. • 1.044 S.F. UPPER LEVEL OCC - 2 OCCUPANTS 30 "x48\ CLEAR FLOOR SPACE I CLEAR \/ FLOOR O SPACE I F.D. m � BACK WALL SIDE WALL 8" MIN (KR CLEARANCE GRAB BARS AT ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSETS RESTROOM DETAILS & NOTES SCALE: 3/8" - 1' -0" 7. -19 HIGH FOUNTAIN EOUIPMENT r PERMITTED IN SHADED AREA 8" MIN.) L 6- MIN. SPOUT HEIGHT AND KNEE CLEARANCE 6" MAO.(T0E CLEARANCE 7" MIN. 9 MAX. LAVATORY CLEARANCES HIGH FOUNTAIN LOW FOUNTAIN, \ - 30 "x48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOUNTAIN OR COOLER DRINKING FOUNTAIN DETAILS & NOTES SCALE: 3/8" - 1' -0" ENLARGED RESTROOM PLAN SCALE: 3/8" - 1' -0" • NOTE: VERI SPRINKLER FIRE DEPT. W/ SPRINKI AND LOCAL 0 0 0 120' -8" / I- 16' -6" 1 12' -IO" 13' -0" r . ., 13' -0" 13' -0" / 11' -8• / 18' / 24' -4" F—\ � �• / / 1 / 1 / 2 / / / /d' . .ISO //I�.A V VA O OZBQ/IIZWIIN/O / // ' 8 _ • a d4• I I ° -- � d e e UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/8" - 1' -0" UPPER LEVEL S.F. • 1.044 S.F. UPPER LEVEL OCC - 2 OCCUPANTS 30 "x48\ CLEAR FLOOR SPACE I CLEAR \/ FLOOR O SPACE I F.D. m � BACK WALL SIDE WALL 8" MIN (KR CLEARANCE GRAB BARS AT ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSETS RESTROOM DETAILS & NOTES SCALE: 3/8" - 1' -0" 7. -19 HIGH FOUNTAIN EOUIPMENT r PERMITTED IN SHADED AREA 8" MIN.) L 6- MIN. SPOUT HEIGHT AND KNEE CLEARANCE 6" MAO.(T0E CLEARANCE 7" MIN. 9 MAX. LAVATORY CLEARANCES HIGH FOUNTAIN LOW FOUNTAIN, \ - 30 "x48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOUNTAIN OR COOLER DRINKING FOUNTAIN DETAILS & NOTES SCALE: 3/8" - 1' -0" ENLARGED RESTROOM PLAN SCALE: 3/8" - 1' -0" • NOTE: VERI SPRINKLER FIRE DEPT. W/ SPRINKI AND LOCAL 0 0 0 0 1.-0 15, -6, _. - M-- __$! 12 71. T. RIDGE VENT OVERHANG for WIDE POLYURETHANE MOLDING W/ 5' -2" RADIUS (TYP.) 12 10 1 L2 0 OVERHANC OVERHANG EAST ELEVATION 6V-8" , 4, -8" 10' -4" SCALE: 1/8" - 1' -0" 1' 0•-- OVERHANG (TIP.) 5 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" - ihp TOP OF ROOF EL. 136' -6" ASPHALT SHINGLES (TYP.) VINYL LAP SIDING FACE BRICK SOLDIE COURSE FACE BRICK FINISHED FLOOR q EL 100' -0' TOP OF FOOTING EL 89' -1 3/4 1. -0 OVERHANG (TYP.) J_CCNT. RIDGE VENT 10 12 12 TOP OF STEEPLE EL . 1451 -017 TRUSS BEARING EL - 135' -09F OVERHANG 6" YADE POLYURETHANE MOLDING 10 �_ 1 102 RE- FINISHED METAL GUTTERS TRUSS BEARING EL. w. 110' -0 e. LANODIZED ALUM. FRAME W/ 1" INS. GLASS (TYP.) POLYURETHANE MOLDING AROUND SANCTUARY WINDOWS PRE - FINISHED METAL DOWNSPOUTS W/ SPLASH BLOCK SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8- - 1' -0" OVERHANG 2' -0' OVERHANG CI 12 10 NOTE: PROVIDE ROOF VENTING 0 1 S.F. PER 300 S.F. OF ROOF AREA W/ SOX OF VENTING LOCATED A MIN. OF 3' -4" ABOVE SOFFIT VENTING W/ THE BALANCE PROVIDED BY SOFFIT VENTING. PROVIDE BOX VENTS AS REO'D ON NORTH SIDE OF BUILDING HNLmnI iIt1 HIn Omnlhv /� RHANG /,uvG P • (TIP.) NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" - EXHIBIT # L A M P E R T ARCHITECTS 13837 NE Lincoln Street Nom Lake, MN 55304 111 Pheo:713.755e211 FaR:763.757.249 lom9erlebmryrl- ereh.eaR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPEOFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY NE OR UNDER MT OPECT SUPT./NUM AND THAT 1 AM A DUL2 LKENSED AROPTECT UNDER THE LAWS Or THE STATE Cr N9MESOTA LEONMO LAMPERT PRINT Neu( uaN9( NO. DATE Lino Lakes, Minnesota Drown By. -EGO. KMB Checked 8y. LL. LAIL Revisions 04.08.02 04.22.02 CITY SUBMITTAL PRELIMINARY DWCS ELEVATIONS Sheet Number A3 Project No. 010606 -4 • Memorandum DATE: June 7, 2002 TO: Mike Grochala FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Russian Baptist Church EXHIBIT # tQ A preliminary review of the submitted documents including a two -page drawing set dated May 31, 2002, has been performed. The drainage response letter dated June 5, 2002, is currently under review. The following comments must be addressed prior to a recommendation given for this subdivision: • Watermain: No city water connection is planned for this parcel. Currently, Lino Lakes city water is over 2500' from this parcel. Any Shoreview utility extension would require a joint powers agreement. Sanitary Sewer: No city sanitary connection is planned for the parcel. Currently, Lino Lakes city sewer is over 2500' from this parcel. Any Shoreview utility extension would require a joint powers agreement. Street Standards: The construction entrance must note that the width is a minimum of 20 feet. Anoka County approval will be required for the street connection. Adjacent driveway must be addressed. Storm Sewer /Grading: - We are in the process of reviewing the revisions to the storm sewer and grading plan that was submitted on June 5, 2002. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651-98.2-2499 • TDD: 651- 982 -2410 • Memo EXHIBIT # t i To: Tanda Gretz From: Marty Asieson CC: Michael Grochala Date: June 6, 2002 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations /May 29, 2002 /Russian Baptist Church /Site Plan Review • Russian Baptist Church • Motion to recommend to forward on without approval or denial to be brought back with pending issues addressed at preliminary plat time. Environmental Board Issues: • Parking stalls be reduced to a minimum. Add pervious parking to future parking expansion. Avoid tree buffer around pond. • Submit a Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan. Protect tree buffer around pond. • Increase infiltration and stormwater practices on site. Encourage church to reconsider use of grant money offered to them by RCWD, to perform innovative surface -water management design. • Landscape Plan • Change Colorado spruce to White spruce or Oaks. • Change Sugar maples to Hackberry, Oak, Red maple or River birch. • Design plantings out of the water areas of infiltration ponds. • Page 1 • • Remove Tree plantings from drainfield area. • • If a septic system must be used, design should include a sand or organic filtration system. • Protect subsoil from compaction. Submit a management plan on how this will be implemented. • Use the City seed schedule in native plant areas. Strongly suggest that a landscape company knowledgeable in native plant planting and maintenance be utilized. • All sod areas must be irrigated. • Page 2 • • • AGENDA ITEM 5C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz P & Z MEETING DATE: June 12, 2002 TOPIC: Conditional Use Permit to allow A Petting Zoo/Farm Visits in a Rural Zone. William Walton, 8140 -20th Avenue ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Bill and Jean Walton have been operating a Petting Zoo, "Walton's Hollow," for over ten years. The Waltons have traditionally trailered their animals to various locations around the Twin Cities (nursing homes, senior centers, etc.). The Waltons, who have moved with their animals from White Bear Lake to Lino Lakes in the past year, would now also like to provide on -site visits to their farm on 20th Avenue and so are asking for a Conditional Use Permit to allow such a use. ANALYSIS Zoning /Comprehensive Plan Analysis The site is zoned Rural and guided as Rural Land Use under the proposed 2001 Comprehensive Plan. All surrounding uses are similarly zoned and guided. Lino Lakes City Ordinance does not specifically address any use such as a "petting zoo" or "farm visit." As a result, staff is recommending using Section 5, subd. 1.H.3, which applies to conditional uses in a Rural zone described as follows: • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Walton CUP "Commercial riding stables, horse boarding stables, horse arenas, dog kennels, animal hospitals with overnight care and similar uses." Staff would argue that the above - described uses are basically similar in nature to that of a petting zoo in the following ways: 1.) Animals are kept on site. 2.) People come to interact with animals. 3.) There is a recreational as well as a commercial component to such uses. As a result, it is appropriate that a Conditional Use Permit be applied for prior to allowing a use such as a petting zoo to occur on the site. Site Analysis The subject site is a 20 -acre parcel located on the east side of 20th Avenue, north of 80th Street. The northern area of the site is open hayfield; the southern area of the site contains fenced pasture areas; the center of the site contains a driveway leading off 20th Avenue to the house, parking area, and pole barn. The 90' X 96' pole barn contains a 60' X 72' central arena area which is surrounded by approximately 15 stalls of various sizes, in addition to some storage areas. There is a hay storage /loft area over the stalls. Five separate fenced pasture areas of various sizes surround the barn. In addition, there is a 20' X 96' area on the north side of the barn, separated from the rest of the barn by a wall, which will contain restroom facilities. Parking areas are to the west and northwest of the barn. Further west of the parking area is an outdoor area to be used for outside exhibition of, and interaction with, animals. Septic The site is serviced by a septic system. Building officials confirm that the system is oversized and capable of handling the extra restroom facilities proposed by the applicant. Fire Code Fire Chief Bennett has advised that any use of the barn area will require that the entire barn be equipped with a sprinkler system, the price of which appears at this time to be prohibitive for the applicant. Chief Bennett has also advised that even use of the room on the north side of the barn for gathering/assembly purposes would require that the entire barn area be sprinkled because the area cannot structurally be adequately separated from the rest of the barn area. Use of the area for restroom purposes, however, can be allowed under fire code according to Chief Bennett. • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Walton CUP As a result of the above, the applicant will plan to exhibit animals out of doors as they do when trailering animals to various sites, and possibly constructing a smaller building in the future for assembly /shelter purposes. Parking /Access The applicant does not foresee general, open hours of operation for the public at large. Rather, scheduled groups of set numbers will visit. Group sizes may vary, but will be known ahead of time. In this way, parking issues can be planned for. The main parking area is to the west of the barn and measures roughly 100' X 100'. A second parking area, measuring roughly 100' X 50', is situated across the driveway to the north from the main parking area. The driveway itself is currently 17 feet wide, and the applicant plans to widen it to 24 feet to better accommodate vehicles. Access to the site is off 20th Avenue, which is a County road. As a result, plans have been forwarded to the Anoka County Highway department for review and comments. Animal Care/Licensing The applicant has carried a license to operate a petting zoo for a number of years under the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plan Health Inspection Service (APHIS). As a requirement for such a license, their site - or any site they exhibit at — is subject to annual, unscheduled inspections by USDA/APHIS officials. Such an inspection was successfully conducted this spring at the site on 20th Avenue. Findings City Ordinance Section 2, subd. 2.B.7 states that the "Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: a.) Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. Visitors to the site will be confined to the site, with no parking taking place on 20th Avenue. b.) Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this Ordinance. The site is zoned and guided Rural. The proposed use is in keeping with this designation. • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Walton CUP c.) Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and/or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. The use maintains the site as a farm, a traditional rural use. d.) Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. The site is serviced by a septic system capable of handling the additional numbers of site visitors. Access to the site is off a County road, and onto a prepared, confined parking area. e.) Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Public cost should not be impacted, as the petting zoo will be confined to the site. Additional use of roadway for access to the site is not foreseen to be appreciable. f.) Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. Visitors to the site are not foreseen to be in numbers great enough to cause excessive noise or access issues. All parking will be confined to the site. g.) Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. Visitors to the site are not foreseen to be of numbers great enough to cause excessive traffic issues. All parking will be confined to the site. h.) Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The site will continue as a rural farm site. • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Walton CUP i.) Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. City Ordinance states that "the applicable provisions of Section 500 of the City Code relating to the keeping of animals are determined to be satisfied" Animals and the conditions in which they are kept will conform to City Ordinance. In addition, the Walton animals are routinely (annually) inspected byUSDA/APHIS, as licensing requirements for a petting zoo are the same as those for any other zoo. CONCLUSION Use of the site for a petting zoo /farm visit site appears to conform to the general guidelines outlined for a Conditional Use for a Rural zone under the Lino Lakes City Ordinance, and staff would recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit, with conditions. As various fire and building code issues come into play depending on how the site is • used, staff would recommend the following conditions: 1.) All parking must be contained on site. The driveway should be widened to 24 feet to better accommodate visitor traffic. Parking surfaces should be rocked; any paved/impervious parking surfaces will require submission and approval of a grading plan to the City Engineer. 2.) Any indoor assembly areas must conform to applicable fire and building code; if visitors to the site enter the barn area, it will have to be sprinkled. OPTIONS 1.) Recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit, with conditions. 2.) Recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit. 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1. • • Planning & Zoning Board June 12, 2002 Walton CUP ATTACHMENTS 1.) General Location Map 2.) Site Plan 3.) Barn Plan 4.) Building/Driveway /Parking Configuration Plan 5.) Narrative from the Waltons 6.) Newspaper Article on Walton's Hollow Petting Zoo 6 EXHIBIT # / 7 I / 11 SUB COUNTY DIT& NO. 72 - 7TN . ST.E. • • IA% ?"' ( 902.47 905.28 905.10 905.11 I 904.117 904.99 905.24 904.62 HOUSE 66. 904.74 � ""'�' 904.6,- 904.93 09 �"" SLY R 2 UNE R..< ~� 904.96 904.77 904.96 .93 904.89 EXHIB� NORTH LINE NW 1/4, SEC. 1. T. 31. R. 22 N89'52'54 w 457.53 SW CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4, SEC, 1. T. 31. R. 22 1 0 905.2, AREA = 873,279 SQ. FT. 20.048 ACRES PROPOSED 199.07 888.01 S8 e6 • 900.53 .0 N3A • 8922.72 SB qIA 0 90.154 SR #5 • 902.41 S8 /2A • 901.09 UNE PARALLEL MATH THE WEST UNE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4, SEC. 1. T. 31. R. 22 Q05 /Pl1,7�11A1h71; 904.65 POLE BAR N 905.16 zL/l/lLl!!!1!/lLfl 905.95 POINT 450 FT. EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH UNE Of THE NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SEC. 1. T. 31. R. 22 AND THE EASTERLY R/W UNE OF C.S.A.H. 21 742.60 N89'58'59 "E SOUTH UNE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 Of SEC. 1. T. 31. R. 22 L - 10.0 905.15 • r,1 3.-8" f L 8'-0" 3.-Er 4 • l'x8'Wood Slide Door l'x8'Wood Sltde Door /d( X/ 6 10'x8' Steel Slide Door 0 • 0 0 0 \ • •,‘ 104,. Steel 5I;d 'Door •o, 5' -IO 1/2" F1/2' •5-144" /x-4 gexo, 10'x8 Pverhead Door Ribbed t Insulated W/ 3 Windows 1 l'-10 1/2" 7,, 29" oxed Eave 3'8" ' - 4 8'-0" 3'-Er 4'-4 8'-0" 3'-8" 4'-4 8.-0* 3' -8- 4'-0" 1' '8Uiood 5 ilde Door 10 d / 6 l'x8'Wood Slide Door 51,4' 440 /0 f /6 l'Zit■Wood Slide `poor / /( /' r/,'s Iffreet- ?Sr h)/ -1g C e ,-"dr•p- e‘ 7tiY .•?/1e. e /r /Vee ie. c4, IC x1,1' Steel • Shde Door p Go ; 411 s .t c et 7' )orr j • ts Pe7les-,-4 ;yed Oi Co /./C/e ,'5;'az,y- 20'x9 b Lean-To TA (IS 'td0 e ;et' e bet71-4 — bc/i/A "ve Act 000^?/e4 Gt/) 47e.— 71-4.4.-(er - 40. 5100 Service /..Door ill/ C0ss 21" Boxed Eave Cdumns 8' o.c. Floor Plan scot, 3/32" = (16Th 1 l' -10 1/ 2" 0 l' -IO 1/2" 9' -IO 1/2" EXHIBIT # 3 few( e 0 ra QJ Jo 0 co E 0 0 N 0 F- ru co 03 40 0 Sheet • • EXHIBIT #_5_ Prospective Plans and thoughts from Bill & Jean Walton of 8140 20th Avenue regarding their new farm home We have been in the business of encouraging the interaction of people with animals for quite some time. Please read the accompanying copies of newspaper articles and check out our web site at www.waltons - hollow.com to get a better understanding of what we do. The demand for the services we provide seems to grow at an increasingly rapid rate as a result of a number of factors. Farmland is being replaced with housing development; farms that survive are forced to become large "factory" farms. The old fashioned small family farm like the farms my wife and I grew up on is nearing extinction. I am constantly amazed by the requests we get from what I had considered as farm country, communities such as Kenyon and Sauk Centre, Minnesota and Colfax, Wisconsin. A generation or so ago nearly everyone had access to a farm through a relative or friend who still farmed some. Now children have to be taken to the state fair or the state zoo to see farm animals or be content with what they can learn from books and TV. Some will also hear about the "good old days" on the farm from a grandparent. We will continue taking our animals out to various events throughout the metro area as we have been doing. However, after the word got around regarding our pending move to a much larger farm, we have received numerous inquiries about the possibility of people coming to us, also. The people that we foresee coming to our farm are groups from churches, schools, day care centers, senior and youth centers, scout troops, 4H clubs, etc. We have had some experience with people coming to our farm at our previous place and learned that it is not something to take on without a lot of thought and planning. But one can spend so much time thinking and planning that little gets done. We want to proceed slowly on this and have already discouraged some people, such as the fellow who wanted to schedule sleigh rides for his wife's retirement party, which seemed reasonable until he asked about the availability of a "party room" and catered food as he was expecting 350 to 400 guests. I told him to call me back in July when we'd have a better idea of what facilities we'd have, what size groups we would handle, and what we'd charge IF we did decide to accommodate him. Our new farm is conveniently located on 20th avenue (Anoka Co. Rd 21) just west ofI35E about 3 miles north of 14 and about the same distance south of 97 & 23. We can watch traffic on both I3 5E and I35W from our house. Presently the only permanent buildings on the site are the new 3 bedroom rambler home that we moved in to February 1s` and the new 90' x 96' pole barn that we started using in mid September. There are also several small portable structures used for animal shelter and storage on site. About a mile of new fencing has been installed both on the perimeter and the interior of the majority of the property as shown on the accompanying site map. The fencing in the area of the front gates and the pens on the south side of the barn is 5' high chain link with a top rail. Most of the fencing is 4' high chain link topped with a 11/2" wide white tape at 5' high. The white tape is electrified in most locations; however, along the driveway and parking areas it will probably be for looks only to avoid shocking the curious innocent. • Obviously, the barn and the area around it will be the main focus for visiting guests as all activities will happen or start there. The barn was built with a 20' wide by 96' long lean-to on the north side. At present this lean-to is wide open and unfinished; a pipe to the septic system and a pipe to the house for natural gas are already in place as is the water, electric and phone lines. Our plan is to construct a small office, 2 bathrooms, a utility or furnace room and possibly a small kitchen at the west end and leave the bulk of the space as a year round activity room. The ceiling would be over 9' high and the south wall would have doors and windows looking out into the main part of the barn so it should be a nice open room. We would equip this room with tables and chairs so that it could be used for various purposes. I foresee keeping a sleigh and a one of the carriages in the east end of the room as well as hanging some harness on the walls for decoration. Pony rides and the walk -in petting zoo activity could be done either inside the barn or in the fenced area across the parking area west of the barn. The horse drawn rides would start at the front of the barn and proceed out the north gate and around the open hay field at the north end of the property. An additional route may be across the southeast pasture, out the gate at that corner and then by the trees located along the south edge of the property. I often drive horse drawn hay wagon or carriage on public roads but I'm a bit concerned about doing it on 20th avenue in front of our place due to the lack of shoulders. I intend to talk to Anoka County about the possibility of getting some sort of warning signs erected. Jean and I plan on living here in Lino Lakes and enjoying our animals as long as we are able. We certainly want to be good neighbors and citizens of this fine community and at the same time continue to encourage more positive interaction between people and animals. We are open to any and all suggestions. We can be contacted by a number of ways if there are any questions. Our home phone number is 426 -0733, the business number (which also rings in the house and is on a recorder when we are not here) is 426 -8163 and my personal cell phone is 612 987 -1758. I check e-mail every morning, that address is billw@waltons-hollow.com Thanks Bill Walton www.waltons-hollow.com Traveling petting zoo ade]i g Star Tribune photos by Joey Mc sister "Socks" the Iamb munched on grass as resident Robert Pottorff hung onto his leash at the Ebenezer Hall health -care facility In"!',H?..". Minneapolis. Bill and Jean Walton have been operating their portable petting zoo for 10 years. With more than 150 animals to feed and shelter, they're running out of room at their current home; and are building a new place In Lino Lakes. Couple's love for animals shared with kids, seniors Gabriel the chicken is a crowd favorite when Bill and Jean Walton take their petting zoo to nurs- ing homes and senior centers. A Japanese banty, Gabriel sits on wheelchairs, and � metimes on shoulders, as ple "ooh" and ".ah." "The chickens seem to bring back childhood memo- ries," said Bill Walton, who's been operating the portable petting zoo for 10 years. Yes, the Waltons under- stand the power of animals. "Once, at the White Bear Care Center, I took the chick- en over to.a womanyivho was 'C all curled up and set it. on her tray. She started telling me how she'd been bittefit by a hen when she was a little girl on the farm. And how she'd been chased by the rooster," Walton said. St PAUL continues on B4 Bill Walton, co -owner of Animals of Walton's Hollow of White Bear Lake, blew on the nose of "Benjamin Blue" recently at the Vadnals Heights Heritage Days Festival. Walton said the pony enjoys the attention to his nose. PAGE B4 • STAR TRIBUNE * METRO /STA'114 MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 3.2001 PAUL from Bi 77.egnant pony was start of the animal - raising business "She repeated the stories a 'couple times. After she left, the nurse told me they hadn't heard the woman speak in the past five years." • A varied brood At their home base in White Bear Township, the Waltons feed and shelter more than 150 animals, most of them of a huggable size. They're running out of room, though, and are building a new place in Lino Lakes to house their varied menagerie. When they take their pet- ting zoo on the road, the Wal- ton usually set up small en- closures in parking lots or on lawns. Chicks and ducks and geese start to scurry when the gates open at public events eiprivate parties. Rabbits, , calves, llamas, turkeys, goats and some riding ponies also roam around the pens. They also keep some small Norwegian Fjord horses at the barn, which they use for fall wagon rides. There are no wild or exotic animals. Usually lounging along the fence is Buddy, one of the family's three Great Pyrenees dogs who help protect the an- imals back on the farm. "We were losing 40 to 50 :birds a summer — chickens, ducks, peacocks — to fox and . raccoons that would sneak in at night. So we got the Great Pyrenees, which are livestock guard dogs," Walton said. Losses now are way down, but occasionally an . owl swoops down and carries off a small bird, to the great frus- tration of the dogs, which can only bark helplessly at the es- caping predator. These rare attacks happen back at the fame, never during (getting zoo performance. A pregnant pony Their business is called An- imals of Walton's Hollow and . it's grown rapidly in recent years. Jean and Bill both grew up on farms; his family lived in North Dakota, she came from Iowa. They met in Des Moines while Bill was in school . Soon after they were married, he joined the Army and served in Vietnam. In 1971, Bill became a St. Paul police officer. He retired six years ago. They got into the animal- raising business 22 years ago. They wanted to move from Shoreview to the acreage in White • Bear, but their two sons, then 6 and 8, weren't excited at the prospect of moving away from their friends. "So we bribed them with a pony," Walton said. Turned out that Ginger, the pony, was pregnant. And so it began. "Once we had a barn, we decided we might as well get more animals," he said. The boys, Jason and Justin, now think their parents are nuts fo`r spending so much time and energy on the pet- ting zoo. "They ask: `Are you making 25 cents an hour yet ?' " Jean Walton said. But the boys were grateful for the many critters in their teen years. "They always said the animals were babe mag- Business prospers Since Bill's retirement, the couple has taken on more and more engagements; many days, Jean will take one trailer of animals to a day care while Bill takes another trailer to a senior center. For the past year, they've been assisted by the four Bev- , erly sisters: Congetta, 17; Ali- sha, 15; Gretchen, 10 and Las- sie, 7. Their parents, Garda and Jackie, had hired the Wal- tons to appear at the girls' birthday parties for several years and eventually all four asked if they could help out, first as volunteers but now as paid assistants. Jean Walton says she loves sharing the animals with chil- dren and adults. She always points out the many kinds of chickens and goats, making the point that different breeds all get along in the pens. Last week at Ebenezer Hall, a Minneapolis home for sen- iors, Jean held rabbits and chickens for residents, while Bill led a llama and a calf through the rows of wheel- chairs. A week earlier, he had taken a llama on an elevator to the top of another senior housing center, creating quite a stir among those waiting at each floor. Rose Furst, a volunteer at Ebenezer Hall, a health -care facility In Min- neapolis, made face - Friday at a lla- ma named "Paint the Town." Star Tribune photo by Joey McLeister Ruthie Hall, an Ebenezer resident, tried to feed grain to one of the ducks, but an adult Vietnamese potbellied pig kept nosing in. "I thought you were going to bring a baby pig instead," Jean said to "Couldn't catch any," Bill said. "Some people seem con - cemed about whether the ani- mals get good care, but once they see how clean they are and healthy, we get a positive reaction," Jean Walton said. The . couple keeps all the animals year- round, never eat any of them and provide regu- lar veterinary care. "One of the reasons we started the petting zoo was to help pay the costs of all the animals we already had," Bill Walton said. And now it's become .a full- time job for the couple. One of the Ebenezer resi- dents asked Jean: "What else do you do ?" Lots of chores and poop pickup," she said. — Around St. Paul runsMon- days and Fridays. Joe Kimball is at 651- 298 -1553 or joek- @startribune.com