Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/09/2003 P&Z PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, July 9, 2003 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 11, 2003 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -01 regarding the Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -10, Mary Alice Divine B. PUBLIC HEARING, K -G Development, Ravens Hollow, East of Hodgson Rd and South of Fox Trace, Preliminary Plat & Rezone, Jeff Smyser C. PUBLIC HEARING, Frank Feela Inc., Haley Manor, NE portion of MarDon Acres, Rezone, Preliminary Plat & Comp Plan Amendment, Jeff Smyser D. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Discount Tire, 633 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review and CUP, Mike Grochala E. Century Farm North, Final Plat, Jeff Smyser VI. DICUSSION ITEMS A. Continued - Banners, as they relate to the City Sign Ordinance, Jeff Smyser B. Continued - Fabric accessory structures, used as carports, Jeff Smyser VII. ADJOURN CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL • Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:36 p.m., June 11, 2003. • II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Schaps requested additions or deletions to this evening's agenda. Hearing none, the agenda was approved as submitted. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 14, 2003 Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the minutes of the May 14, 2003, meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board, and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 -0 -1. Ms. Lane abstained. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared Open Mike open at 6:37 p.m. No one was present for Open Mike. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:37 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 7 -0. DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board June 11, 2003 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Bruggeman Properties, SE corner of Birch Street and Hodgson Road, Preliminary Plat, Rezone, CUP and Site Plan Review — Jeff Smyser Chair Schaps advised that this application has been withdrawn by the applicant and will be resubmitted as a new application to include the entire property. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 6:39 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 7 -0. Mr. Corson inquired if the residents will receive a new notice regarding this public hearing. Chair Schaps responded in the affirmative. B. PUBLIC HEARING, Discount Tire, 633 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review and CUP — Mike Grochala Chair Schaps noted that this public hearing will be continued to July. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to July of 2003, and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 7 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Banners, as they relate to the City Sign Ordinance — Jeff Smyser Mr. Smyser presented the staff report regarding banners as they relate to the Sign Ordinance and advised that staff has seen an increase in these signs of late in Lino Lakes. He presented staff s analysis along with photocopies of several instances of banners and other temporary signage currently found in Lino Lakes. Mr. Smyser asked for direction from the Board on how to address the issue. Chair Schaps noted it appears in certain cases the ordinance is being violated, probably unknowingly. Mr. Rafferty stated this relates to aesthetics and the City should step forward and curtail it. Mr. Corson suggested a maximum square footage such as 32 square feet be enforced, which is the limit enforced in other cities. He commented they need to keep the situation under control so they do not look like Las Vegas. • Ms. Lane suggested some limits be placed, as banners begin to look tattered if they have been up for too long. DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board June 11, 2003 Page 3 Mr. Tralle inquired about the use of flags shown in one of the photographs. Mr. Smyser replied these are streamers, they fall under the classification of portable signs and are not typically allowed without a permit, like banners. There are places that get told to take them down and six months later put them back up. Mr. Hyden asked if a permit is required each time a sign is put up. Mr. Smyser responded a permit would be required each time a portable sign is put up. The cost would be less than $100 for the permit. Mr. Lyden stated there is a difference as to whether the sign is attached to the building or not. These restrictions would do what he would like, however, he does not want to over - regulate either. He noted ninety % of the banners will be regulated to liquor stores and those types of places. He also stated while they are discussing aesthetics, the grass that is ten feet high in front of the City Hall is an eyesore coming into the City. Chair Schaps asked if the Council has discussed this. Mr. Smyser responded they have not discussed it to any degree. Business owners came to a Council worksession stating that they should be able to have banners when they had been informed to take them down. The Council directed staff to look into this. He indicated staff will come back to the Board with a matrix of different options at the next Commission meeting. The Board directed staff to come back with a fee schedule also. B. Fabric Accessory Structures, used as Carports — Jeff Smyser Mr. Smyser advised that a number of residents are constructing temporary fabric structures, primarily for storage of vehicles. This is a relatively new product that typically consists of aluminum poles with plastic fabric stretched over the poles. He presented the staff report and explained that staff is bringing the issue to the Planning & Zoning Board for discussion to if see staff should pursue adding language to the Zoning Ordinance to address this type of structure. Chair Schaps stated the very nature of these structures is temporary. Mr. Tralle suggested the structures not be allowed in the front yard or visible from the front street. Mr. Rafferty stated neighbors do not have an interest in looking at something like this and it causes rifts in neighborhoods. The people that put these up do not protect the rights of the individuals that live next to them. This relates to aesthetics and the City should step forward. Mr. Lyden commented residents can be fiercely independent, whether it concerns the wrecked vehicle or the garbage ordinance. This will be a `slippery slope' and he questions where they will end if they start here. He noted some people may not want to allow something like trampolines. He agrees with a. requirement for the structures to DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board June 11, 2003 Page 4 • meet setbacks and the City has brought this on by allowing houses to be built on such small lots. • • Ms. Lane suggested the structures be restricted from visibility from the street, with a placement restriction in the back yard so side neighbors do not have to view them. Mr. Corson suggested as a minimum the structures should be well maintained. Mr. Hyden indicated he agrees in allowing the structures for temporary use. If they are used for storage the property owner should obtain an accessory structure permit. Chair Schaps stated this should be recognized as a temporary structure, which can be allowed with a permit for a time period of several months. It would not be wise to put these structures up in the winter due to possible damage by snow. Mr. Smyser explained this issue has not been discussed by the City Council. There has not been any enforcement action on these structures. When residents have inquired what is allowed with the structures staff has informed them they must meet setbacks and accessory square footage requirements on the lot. There is nothing in the ordinance, however, that states that. Many of the structures have been put up without notifying the City. He advised if something is done from a regulatory standpoint the zoning ordinance would need to be amended. He explained when staff first started seeing these structures a few years ago they questioned if they would be a safety hazard due to the possibility of them being crushed by snow. Most of the structures, however, are to cover things such as boats. Staff did not believe there would be safety issues from that standpoint. Chair Schaps suggested there be an exception to the permit requirement for a situation such as a party, as the structure would only be needed for a day or two. He directed staff to bring the suggestions of the Commission to the Council for discussion. Mr. Tralle commented not all of these structures are cheap. There are some structures that can house four rv's at a cost of $6,000. Chair Schaps inquired if a structure of that size would fall under the accessory structure ordinance. Mr. Smyser responded it is very common in situations like this for the manufacturer to say a permit is not required. That, however, is up to the individual municipality. Mr. Tralle asked how a large structure like this would fit into a rural zone. Mr. Smyser responded currently the amount of allowed accessory building space is dependent on the size of the lot, and the temporary structures could be included in this. Mr. Tralle questioned if passing an ordinance in relation to these structures would create another ordinance that is not going to be enforced. DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board June 11, 2003 Page 5 Mr. Lyden asked how many inquiries or complaints staff receives regarding these structures in a one year period. Mr. Smyser responded in the last 12 months staff has been contacted regarding this approximately 12 times, with two or three of these being complaints. They are not peppered with complaints, but by the time we are, there would already be a problem. He indicated staff will discuss the suggestions of the Commission and bring back the possibilities to be considered. They may not even want to deal with it, but he thinks it is important to have the discussion. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:14 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 7 -0. Respectfully submitted, Carol Hamer, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • AGENDA ITEM V -A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine P & Z DATE: 07/09/03 TOPIC: BACKGROUND: Resolution No. 03 -01 regarding the Modification of Development District No. 1 and Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -10 The developers of the Lakes Business Park between 35W and Lake Drive (see attached map) have proposed to plat the 30 -acre park into sites for light industrial users. The land is zoned Light Industrial and is designated for industrial use in the Comprehensive Plan. In conjunction with the plat, the developers are working with a potential light industrial user that is proposing to construct a 265,000 sq. ft. facility on approximately 13 acres in the park. Two of the three parcels involved in this new plat are currently a part of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -9 established in 1998. This 10 -year economic development district no longer has the capacity to assist with development of this new business park. It is anticipated that development of the business park may justify some public expenditure for infrastructure improvements to Lake Drive. In addition, the business park has not developed solely through private efforts and may require public participation to develop in a manner consistent with the city's goals for commercial and industrial development. The Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (EDA) has authorized preparation of a modified Plan for Development District No. 1 and creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -10. The City Council has scheduled a public hearing for August 11, 2003. The plan has been sent to Anoka County and Centennial School District for review. According to statute, the city's planning review board shall make a finding that the establishment of a new TIF District is consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 03 -01 finding the modification of Development District No. 1 and Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -10 is consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. • • • LINO LAKES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 03 -01 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 -10 WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA ") has authorized preparation of a Modified Program (the "Program ") for Development District No. 1 (the "District "), and a Plan for establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -10 within the District (the "Plan "); and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council (the "City Council ") called for a public hearing to be held at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, August 11, 2003; WHEREAS, the Program and the Plan have been submitted to the Planning and Zoning Board for its comment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134: and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board has reviewed the Program and the Plan and compared it with the City's comprehensive plan and other plans for development for the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as follows: 1. The modified Program for the District and the establishment of TIF District No. 1 -10 is found to be consistent with the plans for development of the City of Lino Lakes as a whole. 2. It is recommended that the City Council and the EDA take the action necessary to adopt the Program and the Plan. • Dated: July 9, 2003 • ATTEST: Secretary • • Chairperson • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota and Lino Lakes Economic Devel_.=� rnent Authority Tax Increment Financing for Tax Increment Finan District No. c Development) Prepared by: SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED 85 E. Seventh Place, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55101 -2887 (651) 223 -3000 WWW. SPRINGSTED. COM TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page(s) A. Definitions 1 B. Statutory Authorization 1 C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose 1 D. Statement of Objectives ; 2 E. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as an Economic Development District 2 F. Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule �. ° , 3 G. Property to be Included in the TIF District 3 H. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District 3 I. Specific Development Expected to Occur W . e TIF District r,. 4 J. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Finan 4 K. Estimated Public Costs ° . 5 L. Estimated Sources of Revenue °. . 5 M. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness 6 N. Original Net Tax Capacity �, 6 O. Original Tax Capacity Rate 7 P. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax ectedYTax Increment 7 40 Q. Use of Tax Increme 7 R. Excess Tax Inca - , <° 8 S. Tax Increment ogling and the re Year R 9 T. Limitation on Adman rative . nse 9 U. Limitation on Prope o '•tec c r ments - Four Year Rule 10 V. Esti . ion Ot Taxing Jurisdictions 10 W. Prig anned Impr -me 10 X . lopment Agrees w" is �' 10 Y. As ment Agreeme " 11 6y� 4 Z. Modifi 'ns of the Ta ";crement Financing Plan 11 AA. Adminis " n of the T ncrement Financing Plan 11 AB. Financial Rem >,: isclosure Requirements 12 Map of the Tax Increment Financing District EXHIBIT I Assumptions Report EXHIBIT II Projected Tax Increment Report EXHIBIT III Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report EXHIBIT IV Market Value Analysis Report EXHIBIT V • • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Section A Definitions The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authority" means the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority. "City" means the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota; also referred to as a "Municipality ". "City Council" means the City Council of the City; also referred to as t- "Governing Body ". "County" means Anoka County, Minnesota. "Development District" means Municipal Development DI described in the corresponding Development Program. "Development Program" means the Development Pr "Project Area" means the geographic area of th,' 1 in the City, which is 'Mtn for the Develop ivelopment Restrict. "School District" means Independent School District "State" means the State of Minnesot t District. esota. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, S 4 throu 9.1799, both inclusive. "TIF District" means Tax Inrrf - nt Financ "TIF Plan" means the to creme financing p ent) District No. 1 -10. for the TIF District (this document). Section B Statu The Deve City Co and �t purpo of the compn to sinister devel is specified in S elopment Distn sib area describe`' 'strict W' fish uthorizes th = tty, upon certain public purpose findings by the signate development districts within the City and to develop nt p�`t ms therefore to meet the needs and accomplish the public n C. ' I ccordance with the purposes set forth in Section 469.124 ct, t e City Council has established the Development District in Section E and has adopted this Development Program. City to establish and administer tax increment financing districts rict. Eligible public costs of the Development District and TIF ncrements collected from the TIF District. The TIF Act a within the Devet District may be pal uthorize, ent Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose The City Council has determined that there is a need for the City to take certain actions it deems necessary in order to encourage, ensure and facilitate development and redevelopment by the private sector of underutilized, inappropriately used and unused land located within the corporate limits of the City. Such actions are necessary in order to provide additional employment opportunities for residents of the City and the surrounding area; to improve the tax base of the City, the County and the School District, thereby enabling them to better provide needed public services; and to improve the general economy of the City, the County and the State. SPRINGSTED Page 1 • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Section D Statement of Objectives The Authority seeks to achieve the following objectives through the establishment of TIF District No. 1 -10; 1. provide employment opportunities within the community. 2. improve the tax base of Lino Lakes and the general economy of the City and State; 3. encourage industrial development in an area of the community which has not been utilized to its full potential; and 4. implement relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan. The Authority's specific purpose in establishing TIF D ' 1 -10 is to promote the development of four light industrial facilities in the Marshan' _"' e Busiriess Park. The Panattoni project will consist of an approximate 265,000 square f t light manufacturing facility. Future expansions may also include three additional outlot builds buildings totaling 160, 00 square feet. The Authority intends to use increment generated benew developments to' write down land costs and the cost of inclu special assessments, v p the intereVortion. Section E Designation of Tax Increment Finan Economic Developmen t 'strict Economic development districts are a any project, or portions of a project, because: (3) The T1 District quail des ti in this TIF establishment of the TIF f would be Ipcated in anot increased e pyment and rict as an hcrement financing district which consist of rity finds_;to be in the public interest , or manufacturing from moving their cipality; in the state; or ervation a ancement of the tax base of the state. Tax increments loans, subsidies, gr square footage of th omic development district in that the proposed development (se °_ ction I) meets all of the criteria listed above. Without rict, thioposed development would not occur within the City, but municipality. The proposed development will also result in ancement of the tax base in both the City and the State. mic development district must be used to provide improvements, rest rate subsidies, or other assistance in which at least 85% of the ities to be constructed are used for any of the following purposes: (1) manufacturing, production, or processing of tangible personal property; (2) warehousing, storage and distribution of tangible personal property, excluding retail sales; (3) research and development related to the activities listed in (1) or (2) above; (4) telemarketing if that activity is the exclusive use of the property; (5) tourism facilities (see M.S. Section 469.174, Subd. 22); SPRINGSTED Page 2 • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (6) qualified border retail facilities (see M.S. Section 469.176, Subd. 4c); or (7) space necessary for and related to the activities listed in (1) through (6) above. In addition to the uses specified above, tax increments may also be used to provide assistance for up to 15,000 square feet of any separately owned commercial facility located within a "small city" (see M.S. Section 469.176, Subd. 4c), or to pay for excessive site preparation and public improvement costs in a district containing bedrock soils conditions in 80% or more of its acreage (see M.S. Section 469.176, Subd. 4c). Tax increments from the TIF District will be used to provide finan+ t ssistance to the proposed development (see Section I), in which over 85% of the squarecotage of the facilities to be constructed will be used for manufacturing or other purpose (1) above. Section F Duration of the TIF District and the, tee Year Rule Economic development districts may remain inexistence 8 years from the date4eceipt by the authority of the first tax increment. The Author ticipates 1-the TIF Distncf will remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law roject't to be through the year 2014). Modifications of this plan (see Section AA) shall not eat se limitations. In addition, no tax increments shall be years from the date of certification unless:wi the Auth'orit,; from the TIF District after three at time pe Sectio The 'istrict is an a ima o acre area of land located within the Project Area A map showing e location of ' e TIF Dist ict is shown in Exhibit I. The boundaries and area encompa ;. by the TIF D strict are described below: (1) bonds have been issued in aid of the roject Area (xcept revenue bonds issued pursuant to, .S. sections 469 69.1 (2) the Authority has ac•t red props � within the TIF District; or (3) the Auth ty has ducted pub c improvements within the TIF District. cluded in the TIF District cel ID Nu m er 17- 23 -0012 17- 31 -22 -32 -0006 17- 31 -22 -32 -0003 Legal Description The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right -of -ways located upon or adjacent to the property described above. Section H Property to be Acquired in the TIF District SPRINGSTED Page 3 • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota The Authority may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District; however, the Authority does not anticipate acquiring any such property at this time. Section I Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District The project will consist of the construction of four industrial buildings to be used for manufacturing. The first building to be constructed is expected to be 265,000 square feet and completed by 2004. Outlots A, B and C are expected to be 40,000 square feet completed in 2005, 60,000 square feet completed in 2006 and 60,000 square feet completed in 2007, respectively. In addition, a portion of the increment will be used for Drive improvements. The four facilities are expected to be fully constructed in 200 the tax rolls as of January 2, 2008 for taxes payable in 200 At the time this document was prepared there wer, regards to the above described development. be 100% assessed and on signed corgi ction contracts with Section J Findings and Need for Tax Increr1 t Finanp In establishing the TIF District, the City makes the fo i (1) The TIF District qualifies; �.o r'i'dings: economic d a aza•ment district; ens and facts supporting this See Section E of th findin (2) The prop expec fore reason: than th ment, i lely thrd d the ind to occur opinion of~the City, would not reasonably be h private investment within the reasonably used market value of the site that could out the use of tax increment would be less OW estimated to result from the proposed subtracting fl present value of the projected tax increments uration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan; aso d facts supporting this finding are that the developer has nted the Authority that it would not undertake the proposed ent without the assistance of tax increment financing. Private t will not finance these development activities because of e costs. It is necessary to finance these development activities the use of tax increment financing so that other development by enterprise will occur within the Project Area. (3) A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above and is shown in Exhibit V. This analysis indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments. The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and SPRINGSTED Page 4 • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the TIF District is properly zoned, and the TIF Plan has been approved by the City Planning Commission and will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (4) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise. (5) The reasons and facts supporting this findingre that the development activities are necessary so that developmand redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within the Pro:. rea. The City elects the method of tax incremen Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(b)' Section K Estimated Public Costs tion set forth in Minnesota methq b) in Section P). The estimated public costs of the TIF District listed b reimbursement from tax increments of the TIF Dist Such costs bre eligible for Land /building acquisition 750,000 Site improvements /preparation « s' 0 Public improvements 00,000 Parking Facilities 4 0 Bond principal pa 785,000 Bond interest 475,000 Loan pnnci fi ayments 0 Loan interest ments 0 Administrative e 130,000 Ca ®t1 terest 120,000 tints 'de district 484,000 4,244,000 0 4,244,000 The Authority resery e right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost is not increased. Section L Estimated Sources of Revenue Tax increment revenue Interest on invested funds Bond proceeds Special assessments 2,409,000 50,000 1,785,000 0 SPRINGSTED Page 5 • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Rent/lease revenue Grants Other Subtotal Transfers in Total 0 0 0 4,244,000 0 4.244.000 The Authority anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed development through the use of a pay -as- you -go technique. As tax increments are deliected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these taxes will be distri ed t e developer /owner as reimbursement for public costs incurred (see Section K The Authority reserves the right to finance any or a public costs of the T1 istrict using pay - as- you -go assistance, internal funding, generatt� ligation or revenue or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. ThAuthority also r serves the rigl ) . to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to for such costs including, but not limited to, special assessments, utility revenues, federal or to funds, and investment income. Section M Estimated Amount of Bon The Authority does not anticipate issuing ;tax incre costs of the TIF District, bu 94-,v, es the rr ht to a� $1,785,000.�e� inance the estimated public ends in an amount not to exceed Section N Origin The County Auditor sha be equal ttj #i1V Comm* this Dec e ohgthla.,_ capacity of the TIF District. This value will acity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State istricts certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, ssessment year. For districts certified between July 1 and ased on the current assessment year. of all property within the TIF District as of January 2, 2002, for 5,000. Upon establishment of the TIF District, and subsequent estimated that the original net tax capacity of the TIF District will The Esti taxes paya . reclassification be approximateljt Market ValtJ+ 2003, is $ roperty N. 95th Each year the Coun `• uditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased as a result of: (1) (2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District; (3) (4) changes in property classification rates. changes in the tax - exempt status of property; changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or SPRI NGSTED Page 6 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • Section 0 Original Tax Capacity Rate • The County Auditor shall also certify the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the original net tax capacity. In future years, the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of (a) the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or (b) the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. At the time this document was prepared, the sum of all local tax r that apply to property in the TIF District, for taxes levied in 2003 and payable in 2004, wa •t yet available. When this total becomes available, the County Auditor shall certify this a � as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating the tad ent generated by the TIF District, the sum of the local tax rates for taxes levied in 200 -and pa ate in 2003, is 129.834% as shown below. Taxing Jurisdiction 2002/2003 Local Tax Rate City of Lino Lakes 47.603% Anoka County 37.714% ISD No. 12 X: 37.467% Other 7.050% Total 9.834% Section P Projecte Projec Each year the Coun TIF District. To the shall be kn For co ands the a exclude capacity ax Capacity and editor s "inities affect pter 276A, the cart rs tion of fiscal $ +roduct of any wa-rtified) times it ire tha et tax cap rrent net tax capacity of all property in the e original net tax capacity, the difference the TIF District. by the fiscal disparity provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F inal net x capacity of the TIF District shall be determined before arity. > subsequent years, the current net tax capacity shall al disparity increase in the TIF District (since the original net tax e appropriate fiscal disparity ratio. The County Au d i+ haltfy to the Authority the amount of captured net tax capacity each year The Author ose to retain any or all of this amount. It is the Authority's intention to retain 100% of th itured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Exhibit II gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit III which shows the projected tax increment generated over the anticipated life of the TIF District. Section Q Use of Tax Increment Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by • the TIF District and pay such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be SPRINGSTED Page 7 • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit III shows the projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District. The Authority has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of the following purposes: (1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative costs associated with the TIF District (see Section T); (2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds, other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF Distri (3) accumulate a reserve securing the payment bonds issued to finance the estimated publicists of (4) pay all or a portion of the county ro Board under M.S. Section 469.175 (5) return excess tax increments to County and School District. ,increment bonds or other IF District; is as may be rlrred by the County ivision la; or county Auditor for redistribution to the City, Tax increments from property locate, one county m st be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive this requirement. Tax increments shall-,n t be s • to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City. Tax increment shall not b or maintenance of a bu 1 municipality, county : F government, or fot recreational, or conlE renovation of a parking If there bene with of tax fair mar" subsidies, paid for 0 finance ed prime any otht a used a aging i0 0eg pool district; commons e pure sition;ttstruction, renovation, operation, nd regularly for conducting the business of a local unit of government or the State or federal public park, or a facility used for social, his prohtb tion does not apply to the construction or ovined facility for conference purposes. ement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other to rep all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed yme hall be subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use e incl s sale of property at less than the cost of acquisition or Lund or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest rate fictions, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be neficiary. of assist: ncrements, suF ments. Assis alue, grants, service cone by th eloper or Section R Exce ° :fix Increment In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the Authority shall use the excess tax increments to: (1) (2) (3) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds; discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof; pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds; or SPRI NGSTED Page 8 • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution. Section S Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule At least 80% of the tax increments from the TIF District must be expended on activities within the district or to pay for bonds used to finance the estimated publicsets of the TIF District (see nerements may be spent on roject Area, except to pay are considered to have cons dared to have been spent Section E for additional restrictions). No more than 20% of the t costs outside of the TIF District but within the boundaries o debt service on credit enhanced bonds. All administrative;, been spent outside of the TIF District. Tax increments within the TIF District if such amounts are: (1) actually paid to a third party for act hies performed within the IF District within five years after certification of the istrict; (2) used to pay bonds that were issue nd sott o a third party, the proceeds of which are reasonably expected on the t et of issuance to be spent within the later of the five -year period or a reasonable temporary period or are deposited in a reasonably required re rve r replacement upd. used to make payments contracts for uactivities perf within five re rs fte ' certific used. incurs ments is third party under binding Dirfrct, which were entered into payment of eligible costs (including interest) cation of the district. Beginning with the sixt increment within th has be° -et aside to I Oa of the TIF District, at least 80% of the tax outstand hinds or make contractual payments obligated outstanding bonds have been defeased and sufficient money ontractual obligations, the TIF District must be decertified. The £"o'? fPrity does not a (except 4 lylowable admi allow for t 'p. °dement pooli Section T Lim ate ax increments will be spent outside of the TIF District ative expenses); however, the Authority does reserve the right to from the TIF District in the future. Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the Authority other than: (3) amounts paid for the purchase of land; amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the project; relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the project; SPRINGSTED Page 9 • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to section 469.178; or (5) amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in clause (1) to (3). Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan or (b) 10% of the total tax increment "Oltures for the project. Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Imp!, .vaDri n . - Four Year Rule If after four years from certification of the TIF District nadmolition, re a ilitation, renovation, or qualified improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel Located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall be excluded from the District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, orrsubstantial_, e bnstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The Authority must submit to the County Aud of, by February 1 of the fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each p rcel in the TIF District. If a parcel is excluded from the TIF't strict and the A thority or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the above a vities, the Au ority shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commence and th parcel sha once again be included in the 6. TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net fax capacity of the parcel, as most recently certified by the Commissioner o l evenue, and addsuch ar o nt to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. r Taxijgyurisdictions mpact on eat` pmtaxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected ty of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other elieves that there will be no adverse impact on other taxing the District, since the proposed development would not have meniti The TIF District and the provision of public assistance. A jurisdi ions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the part of the general tax base. Exhibit IV e retained; taxin isdictions. juris cans during the I occur re without the estab positive impact on other to developmen therein becom Section W Prig`:N® +ed Improvements The Authority shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with a listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued. There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the TIF District. • Section X Development Agreements SPRINGSTED Page 10 • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota If within a project containing an economic development district, more than 10% of the acreage of the property to be acquired by the Authority is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property is pledged), then prior to such acquisition, the Authority must enter into an agreement for the development of the property. Such agreement must provide recourse for the Authority should the development not be completed. The Authority anticipates entering into an agreement for development, but does not anticipate acquiring any property located within the TIF District. Section Y Assessment Agreements The Authority may, upon entering into a developme assessment agreement with the developer, which establis land and improvements for each year during the life ofthJ The assessment agreement shall be presented t the plans and specifications for the improvemer previously assigned to the land, and so long a assessment agreement appears to be an accu agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreeni the County Recorder of each count ';here the pro premature termination of this agreem b, 'rst be apprc District. nt, also enter into an a minimum market value of the TIF District. ounty or City Asses sC ho shall review be constructed, review = °' market value minimum market value c•' tained in the esti to shall certify the assessment be filed for record in the office of is located. Any modification or d by the City, County and School The Authority anticipates entering into an Section Z Modi nt Financing Plan Any reduction or en increase in the amou capitalizecltltr the Aut to be req u increa in th` e; uth the rea of the Project Area or the TIF District; ss,to be incurred; increase in the amount of hat portion- tine captured net tax capacity to be retained by al estimated public costs; or designation of additional property hall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary al TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if: tion islimination of parcels from the TIF District; and ax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net 'those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the es that the TIF District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by m•`. an the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated. The Authority must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date of certification. Section AA Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the Authority shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. The Authority shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County SPRINGSTED Page 11 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • Auditor in this process, the Authority shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The Authority shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value of land and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the County Assessor review and certify this assessment agreement as reasonable. The County shall distribute to the Authority the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Ian, other development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classifica • "'rates or formulas. In administering and implementing the TIF Plan, the following actin ould occur on an annual basis: • • (1) prior to July 1, the Authority shall notify't° Cou development that has occurred in the TI APistrict duriri that the new value will be recorded in s el Y manner. Assessor of any new past year to insure (2) if the County Auditor receives threquest for certification of a neuUiTIF District, or for modification of an existing TIF D strict, b at* July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local to rates foi current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after J)y all be used to determine local tax rates in subsequent ye (3) each ear the County A? ito Y Y capacity of the TIF District The ai occur as a res It of the folio tag: certify the mount of the original net tax certifies hall reflect any changes that anges from tax - exempt to taxable shall be x capacity of the TIF District. The reverse capacity may be modified by any approved lit or rediabtalgf the TIF District; ing the classification of real property cause changes to the tag estimated market value to be applied for property tax s, the - resulting increase or decrease in net tax capacity shall d proprtionately to the original net tax capacity and the retained net tax capacity of the TIF District. The County Audt of the TIF District. the Authority of all changes made to the original net tax capacity Section AB Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements The State Auditor shall enforce the provisions of the TIF Act and shall have full responsibility for financial and compliance auditing of the Authority's use of tax increment financing. On or before August 1 of each year, the Authority must annually submit to the State Auditor, County Auditor and to the governing body of the municipality a report which shall: (1) provide full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in the TIF District; (2) permit comparison and reconciliation of the accounts and financial reports; SPRINGSTED Page 12 • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (3) permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of the TIF District; and (4) be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. The report shall include, among other items, the following information: (1) the original net tax capacity of the district and any subdistrict under 469.177, subdivision 1; (2) the net tax capacity for the reporting period of the dis ice; and any subdistrict; (3) the captured net tax capacity of the district; (4) any fiscal disparity deduction from the captured net rapacity under section 469.177, subdivision 3; (5) the captured net tax capacity retai , �t tax increment finarc under 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clad (6) any captured net tax capacity distn 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), (7) the type of district; ); affected taxing districts under (8) the date the municipality a •grove the mertfinancing plan and the date of approval of an modifica of th tax in reme financing plan, the approval of which r otice, i, a u hearing, and findings under subdivisiotr pa a:;'?�h (a); (9) the dat the author] first reque .d certification of the original net tax capacity of the dis ct and to of requ `:for certification regarding any parcel added to the disci ax mcre ty auditor first certified the original net tax capacity of the of certification of the original net tax capacity of any parcel year i' which the authority has received or anticipates it will increment from the district; (12) th° :ate tF;e`rict must be decertified; (13) for th =.rting period and prior years of the district, the actual amount received from, at least, the following categories: (1) tax increments paid by the captured net tax capacity retained for tax increment financing under section 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (1), but excluding any excess taxes; (ii) tax increments that are interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments; (iii) tax increments that are proceeds from the sale or lease of property, • tangible or intangible, purchased by the authority with tax increments; SPRINGSTED Page 13 • • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (iv) tax increments that are repayments of loans or other advances made by the authority with tax increments; (v) bond or loan proceeds; (vi) special assessments; (vii) grants; and (viii) transfers from funds not exclusively associat- io' h the district; (14) for the reporting period and for the prior year expended for, at least, the following categori (1) (ii) (iii) (iv) administrative (v) public park faci purposes, or other (vi) transfers torpnds no district the actual amount acquisition of land and buildings through condem on or purchase; site improvements or preparation costs; installation of public utiliti or other similar public impro arking facilities, streets, roads, sidewalks, ncluding the t agated cost of the Authority; and ies for soc recreational, or conference prove* ts; and liar p (15) for prc and i=ties sold evelope . rice paid b ..'`e develo tey as ted with the district; the total cost of the property to the Authority (16) the amo veme ts�' munic it: dur value of in -kind benefits, such as physical the use of :,` iding space, that are paid or financed with tax are provided to another governmental unit other than the e reporting period; the amoune the district th any pments for activities and improvements located outside of ire pai for or financed with tax increments; amount ing p payments of principal and interest that are made during the on any non - defeased: eral obligation tax increment financing bonds; (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (19) the principal amount, at the end of the reporting period, of any non - defeased: (i) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and SPRI NGSTED Page 14 • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (20) the amount of principal and interest payments that are due for the current calendar year on any non - defeased: (1) (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (21) if the fiscal disparities contribution under chapter computed under section 469.177, subdivision increased property taxes imposed on other approved the tax increment financing plan contribution; (22) whether the tax increment financin, increment revenues to be expen or 473F for the district is agraph (a). the amount of in the municipality that f the fiscal disparities a res n or other governin (1) to pay bonds, the proceeds; activities outside of the district; (ii) for deposit into,; expended on acti fopument permits ere or may be expended on mon bond d from which money may be outside's e district; or (iii) to otherwise finan financi district; (23) the es proj (24) trtia a of con ncluding a• any addi outside of the tax increment ax increment financing plan of the cost of the enses to be paid with tax increment; and ditor may require. The ity must :' nnu • ublish in a newspaper of general circulation in the City an annul ° atement for ea nt financing district showing: the original ubdivision 1 tax capacity of the district and any subdistrict under 469.177, (2) t , -t tai acity for the reporting period of the district and any subdistrict; (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) the ca ` -d net tax capacity of the district; the month and year in which the authority has received or anticipates it will receive the first increment from the district; the date the district must be decertified; the amount of principal and interest payments that are due for the current calendar year on any non - defeased obligations; if the fiscal disparities contribution under chapter 276A or 473F for the district is • computed under section 469.177, subdivision 3, paragraph (a). the amount of SPRINGSTED Page 15 • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota (8) (9) increased property taxes imposed on other properties in the municipality that approved the tax increment financing plan as a result of the fiscal disparities contribution; the amounts of tax increment received and expended in the reporting period; and any additional information the authority deems necessary. The annual statement must inform readers that additional information regarding each district may be obtained from the authority, and must explain how the additional information may be requested. The Authority must publish the annual statement for a > no later than August 15 of the next year. The authority must identify the newspape :;3 general circulation in the municipality to which the annual statement has been or will bmitted for publication and provide a copy of the annual statement to the county boar uditor, the school board, the state auditor, and the governing body of the municipality .n or 3 fo e August 1 of the year in which the statement must be published. The reporting and disclosure requirements outlin district was certified, and shall end in the year in all tax increments have been spent or returned these requirements, as determined by the State distribution of tax increment. his section shall begin with the year the both the district has been decertified and county for redistribution. Failure to meet ors Office, may result in suspension of SPRINGSTED Page 16 • • Exhibit I Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 1 -10 I�L • Lam: + . �� •r Allitt* *Ng raw PI" ir WIA _I ararr parriff A. re *Et Proposed TIF District No. 1 -10 /. / 7- v. 27- .21- DI, l a a. 1 7- 31.2? - 32 - 4° 3. 17. 3.f- Li- 32- p-ro, inc /udes ail street .apt at/ bill I-lilt -af-1Q5 s. SPRINGSTED Page 17 • • • Exhibit 11 Assumptions Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 1 -10 Panattoni Project Scenario B - Prelim. TIF Projections - FD contribution from within District Type of Tax Increment Financing District Maximum Duration of TIF District Projected Certification Request Date Decertification Date Base Estimated Market Value (1) Times: First $150,000 Excess Original Net Tax Capacity Base Estimated Market Value Increase in Estimated Market Value (2) Total Estimated Market Value Times: First $150,0 Excess Total Net Tax Capaci 1.50% 2.00% Economic Development 8 years from 1st increment 08/31/03 12/31/1 2003/ ears of Increment) 5,000 2,250 14,700 nt/Collection Year 200 2005/2006 $16, 2,250 14,700 $16,950 City of Lino Lakes 47.603% Anoka Coun� LL °` 37.714% ISD #•12 a „m 37.467% Otc. '';.. 7.050% Capacity Rate $885,000 9,663,000 "$10,548,000 2,250 207,960 2006/2007 $885,000 11,463, 000 $12,348,000 2,250 243,960 $210,210 $246,210 129.834% 2002/2003 Fiscal Di §+ i s Contribution FrdthTIF District 32.3301% Administrati r .inage Percent 4 aximum = 10 %) 5.00% Pooling Perceri ; 0.00% Bonds Bonds Dated NA Bond Issue @ 0.00% (NIC) $1,785,000 Eligible Project Costs $1,637,425 Present Value Date & Rate Note (Pay -As- You -Go) Note Dated 08/31/03 Note Rate 5.00% Note Amount $1,582,500 08/31/03 8.00% Notes (1) Pay 2003 base values of 3 parcels provided by City and County. 2 parcels will be removed from TIF District 1 -9. (2) Estimated completed values provided by City. Projects completed in phases between 2004 -07 for Pay 2006 -09. Panattoni bldg complete in 2004, Outlot A bldg in 2005, Outlot B bldg in 2006 and Outlot C bldg in 2007. SPRINGSTED Page 18 • • • JCI Projected Tax Increment Report V -D C w O - N > O e N Q U O J 0 0 N cn O o CO O e O M O CO ea O O O 0 CO CO C) CO 0) CO 10 0) 0 0 0 N 0 0) CO 0 0 U) W D) N CO CO O O C7 I: CO co N O O r h C) R (0 co r CO d' CO N N M 0 0 0 CO a CO CD CD CO CO (0 CD 0 0 0 CV r. (001) T-,- • v O O N N (V N N N N CO CO CO CO CO 0 CO CO CO N N N N N N N 0) 0 00)) N 4A N y C N o w E s 0 J as O O 0 O 0) CO 0) (00 (00 (00 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 LO V O CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CC O cV 7 7 �• - V O O 0 <- (0 (D CO CO CO CO CO 07 0 0 0 - N 0) c- 0- 0- 0- r n CO r CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e e e 03 ▪ CO CO CO CO CO Oi CA of 00)) 0) 0) Cr) 0) CO 0) 0 0 0 CD 0 CD 0 ao m cti w 0) 0) 0) as N N N N 0 LII Co 0 7 0 o e v -le 8z v x • d m CO 0 N c o (0 (O • U Z N 0. an a LL N C) p CV (� x N C F (a N 0) N a J Z U x N • F O N f- CC CO v Z U !T O C C • a w ... N n n h h ..- COO CO 1 O N o 50 ci o) CO 10 0) N N C.00.-00301 CO N C,- CO LO. CD CV R 0) O) CO 1- 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N (C) CC CC) V) (0 (0 N 10 u) 0 0) at O) O) 0) CO 0) O) O) 0) 0) 0) N N CO CD CD O (0 O CO co co co (D (O (O m 1.0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0) 0) N N N N N N N N N N N N (0 CO O O (0 O (O (D (D O (O (O (0 CO O O 0 u) N U) 0 0 0 10 (f) N N CO C) C) CO C) CO C) C) C) C) C) a 10 CD f'- 0 0) Co 1- N CO .7 (0 CO I`• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) CO CO CO CO CO CO CO as M CO C) CO CO M • N N N cV N N SPRINGSTED • • • Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report O O o o U O C N �- !� CO 7 a) m co CJ o co co .c c oa 0 CC m 2 m .o U Z F- 0 0 0 rn o (0 O O O 0 0 0 0 U U Co h O CO CD O) O L U CO M M 0 O d' a U J X u 2 Q CO CA 0 O O O) O) V (O CA O N X Nco I U co 0- V N d Z N Z m cr U O E N CL C C y d •o V 0 Ytoc d u. co G w o 0 C V w a o t7f O E a` c LL c ~ LL N E a `1 m C O x 1 0 0 1 c V O O) N L 0 CO N C` N- n Cn 0 0 O O Q) U N .ze N N CO Z U co O N V N 0 0 N N > N o o co ( w 0 X w -O O0) L w w 0 co (-V 0 ( 0 .0 ca O lU U X co 1-• O CO X O .@ • C .0 CD O U N as t 7 LO. L w O co A Q N > >O N 0 Cp L L d U 0 U O CO CO 0 L N C 0 t L U • 0 CO 0 0 7 0- cn 0 .c >, c > 0 c = C .00 co Cq N Cd • 0 @ O y c O d N t. m U O N N .O N ` U 0 • X � � U X O CCOO 1.- m F- m - 1 c(i 0 v - o N O CO J O OL. O w L 3 w •- O 3 N m U U N L o > m 0 a m c 0 C co .CO CO O O O 0_ U 6 a .O N LL )( >� 0 H1p0 F- v o a� '0 a� q o c T O O U N > E. CD w a LL. N F' w c) 0) 0 F- rn cO • V N N 0 N N o _N X O N_ N L F-• .+T. a' CO N X U O) O O O N a (0 N ~ Z co 0 0 O O C U X CO N F- .0 7 7 c City of Lino Lakes Anoka County N N 0 -c ' Statement 1: S The impact on th SPRINGSTED • • • Exhibit V Market Value Analysis Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 1 -10 Panattoni Project Scenario B - Prelim. TIF Projections - FD contribution from within District Assumptions Present Value Date P.V. Rate - Gross T.I. Increase in EMV With TIF District Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment Subtotal Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF Difference Annual Gross Tax increment resent Value @ ,00% 1 2006 $.N..� 2 2007 2;e x`7,106 168,293 ?98,069 186,633 x298,069 172,809 98,069 160,008 3,069 148,155 '6,069 137,181 2014 "° 298,069 127,019 2015 0 0 2016 0 0 17 0 0 018 0 0 2019 0 0 2020 0 0 2021 0 0 2022 0 0 8 2023 0 0 19 2024 0 0 20 2025 0 0 21 2026 0 0 22 2027 0 0 23 2028 0 0 24 2029 0 0 25 2030 0 0 26 2031 0 0 $2,408,502 $1,381,132 SPRINGSTED Page 21 • • • AGENDA ITEM V. B. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: July 9, 2003 TOPIC: Ravens Hollow - Rezoning to Planned Unit Development - MUSA Reserve Allocation - Preliminary Plat/PUD Development Plan BACKGROUND KG Development Inc. has requested approval of a low and medium density residential planned unit development (Ravens Hollow). The P & Z have discussed several concept plans for this project. The last discussion, on May 14, included the concept for the plat being reviewed now. To accommodate the development proposal, the following approvals are necessary: 1. Rezoning from R (Rural) to Residential Planned Unit Development 2. MUSA Reserve Allocation (21 acres) 3. Preliminary Plat/PUD Development Stage Plan ANALYSIS The following is a summary of the of the proposal: Gross Site Area 22.08 acres Upland Area 20.89 acres Total Lots 56 Gross Density 2.5 units /acre Net Density 2.7 units /acre Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. •� • • • Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site two existing homes, remainder vacant Low Density Sewered Residential and Medium Density Residential Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area Rural North residential (Fox Trace neighborhood) Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 South large lot rural residential Low Density Sewered Residential and Medium Density Residential Rural East large lot rural residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural West large lot residential (Rohavic Oaks) Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural The City's Comprehensive Plan calls for medium density sewered residential uses in the southwest portion of the site and low density sewered uses on the balance of the site. As defined by the comprehensive plan, medium density is 3 -6 units per acre and low density means up to three units per acre. This site is zoned Rural, and a rezoning is needed for urban development. A rezoning is an amendment to the zoning ordinance, which must be consistent with the comprehensive plan. We considered how to meet the requirements of the comprehensive plan on a site whose boundaries don't coincide with the boundaries of the land use categories. A planned unit development provides for some flexibility. The new zoning ordinance provides for rezoning the site to PUD. By rezoning the entire site, and use some creativity, we can arrive at the same overall density required by the comprehensive plan. The site includes approximately 6.2 acres of upland in the Medium Density category. At 3 to 6 units per acre, this would allow for 19 to 37 units. There are about 14.7 acres in the Low Density category. This could go up to three units per acre, or 44 units. The total number of units, therefore, could go up into the 63 to 81 range. However, typical single family density has been about 2.1 units per acre, which calculates to about 31 units. The result is a range of 50 -68 units, as shown below. With 56 units, the project is in the low end of this range, and well below what the comprehensive plan would allow. acres density total units Medium Density 6.2 3 -6 units per acre 19 -37 Low Density 14.7 2.1 31 50 -68 With 56 units, the project is in the low end of this range, and well below what the comprehensive plan would allow. • Rezoning Because the site boundaries don't coincide with the boundaries of the land uses in the comprehensive plan, a PUD rezoning is the best way to handle the site. It allows for spreading the densities across the entire project. Strictly adhering to the land use category borders in the comprehensive plan would create a neighborhood with oddly shaped areas and either an abrupt change from attached townhomes to single family or a convoluted street separating the two. The proposed PUD design allows the project to meet the total density needs established by the comprehensive plan while creating a design that incorporates the different housing types into a sensible, workable whole. Discussion of individual elements of the PUD are discussed below under the preliminary plat/development stage plan heading. The zoning ordinance requires that, for a zoning amendment application: The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The project complies with the land use in the comprehensive plan: the site is guided for Medium Density and Low Density Sewered Residential use. The PUD accommodates both those land use categories and their respective densities. Final platting will not occur until 2004 due to MUSA availability. The project will be consistent with both the MUSA and units /per year limitations of the growth management policy. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The Ravens Hollow lots on the north are compatible with the Fox Trace development to the north. Future development to the south will be medium and low density, like the Ravens Hollow project. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (in the zoning ordinance). The standard lots are similar to the R -1 standards in the zoning ordinance, especially if the eastern lots are adjusted to increase lot areas. The PUD allows flexibility, and the project addresses things that a PUD is supposed to encourage, as listed in the zoning ordinance (see below). • 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. • • • Sanitary sewer service is available via Linda Lane on the north side of the site. Water is available both in Linda Lane and Ware Road. This allows for a loop in the water service, a desirable situation. The systems have adequate capacity. The utilities will be constructed to serve land to the south. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The site is between a collector and an arterial roadway. The proposed access to Ware is spaced as far away from 62nd St. as possible without seriously impacting existing wetlands. Additional access would be from the existing Linda Lane on the north. Ware Road will not be overburdened. In the future, the site would access land to the south when that land develops -this will provide for a future access to Hodgson at Rohavic Lane. MUSA Reserve, Growth Management Criteria The site is in a Stage 1 growth area: utilities can be extended prior to 2010. The City's Growth Management Ordinance establishes annual limits on allocation of MUSA reserve and the number of new units that can be platted. To accommodate the proposed development of 56 units, a total of 20.9 acres of MUSA is necessary. No MUSA remains for year 2003. Since this project is outside of the existing MUSA, it cannot be final platted until 2004. The targets, the status of the allocations, and the proposed Ravens Hollow project are shown in the following tables. MUSA ALLOCATION 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 annual target 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Stoneybrook 27.7 Century Farm North 15.3 11.4 13.5 5.4 9.4 Ravens Hollow 20.9 total remaining 43.0 32.3 13.5 5.4 9.4 0.0 0.0 -7.0 3.7 22.5 30.6 26.6 36.0 36.0 exceeds target by 19% LOTS /UNITS TOTAL 252.01 27.7 55.0 20.9 103.61 148.4 Development Name and Phases Prelim Plat Phasing plans by Year (lots /units to be final platted) year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Stoneybrook 2nd Addn 103 51 52 'Century Farm North 249 56 65 52 43 33 1 Ravens Hollow 56 56 total 51 108 121 52 43 33 0J remainder of 147 39 26 95 104 114 147 • • The target for phasing plans is 50 units per phase. With a project of 56 units, total, it is problematic to break it up. It may be possible to divide the project into two phases, though the economics of this may not allow it. Preliminary Plat/Development Stage Plan There are three parts of the PUD process. The first part, the general concept plan, is the voluntary concept plan review. The second part is the development stage plan, which corresponds to the preliminary plat process. The third part, the final plan, corresponds to the final plat process. The Ravens Hollow project is a PUD rezoning. With a PUD, the plat serves to establish some specific elements that become zoning standards. For example if a plat in a PUD includes reduced setbacks or lot dimensions, these things become the setbacks or dimensions in that plat. As noted in the zoning ordinance, such flexibility is intended to encourage such things as: 1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. 6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations. The primary purpose of using a PUD for Ravens Hollow is to allow the project to comply with the comprehensive plan ( #1). As noted above, the land use category boundaries don't follow the project boundaries, so the densities have been averaged across the entire plat. In order to do so, the plat involves incorporating different housing styles in a creative design ( #2, #4, #6). Design elements that deviate from strict zoning provisions related to setbacks, heights, lot area and dimensions, etc., should be examined in light of the intentions of a PUD. Unit types: The project includes two different housing types. There are 26 standard single family lots and 30 single family detached townhome lots. The location of the varied housing types creates a transition in land use intensities. The standard lots in the northern part of the site coincide with the existing Fox Trace neighborhood. In fact, the Ravens Hollow lots are larger. The single family, zero lot line townhomes in the southern area consistent with the medium density required by the comprehensive plan and provide a • • • transition from the future commercial uses to the south. This transition is consistent with the land use directives of the comprehensive plan and is a positive aspect of the project design. Lots: The proposal is for a PUD zone, and a PUD allows for deviation from strict adherence to zoning provisions such as setbacks, lot area and dimensions. Most of the single family lots on the north half of the plat are consistent with the R -1 dimension and area standards. However, several lots do not, as described in the following table: upland area in sf less than 10,800 sf Lot 8, Block 5 10,771 29 Lot 1, Block 1 10,589 211 Lot 3, Block 1 10,487 313 Lot 4, Block 1 9,922 878 Lot 5, Block 1 10,708 92 In addition, Lot 1 Block 1 is one of eight lots along the northern edge of the plat crossed by a 70 ft. powerline easement. This easement is illustrated on the preliminary plat. As shown on the grading plan, the proposed house pad is right on the edge of the powerline easement, 70 ft. from the northern property line: about 35 ft. from the powerline itself. Lots 2, 6, and 7 have extra area and extra lot width. It may be possible to readjust all the lot widths to increase the smaller lot areas and move the house pad on Lot 1 away from the powerline. The zoning ordinance has no requirements for detached, single family, zero lot line lots. This housing type offers the ability to meet the density requirements of the comprehensive plan and still have a single family residential character in the new neighborhood. The proposed design of these lots is acceptable. Streets: The site is between Hodgson Road, a minor arterial, and Ware Rd., a collector road. It is important to limit the number of accesses to both these streets. Numerous, oddly spaced roads access Ware Rd. in the near vicinity, creating "T" intersections: 62nd St. from the east, Linda Ave. from the west, and Coyote Trail from the east. Linda Ave. forms a full intersection with Hodgson Rd. just north of the site. Rohavic Lane forms a "T" with Hodgson just south of the site. The plat includes one access to Ware Rd. and no access to Hodgson. The proposed access to Ware is spaced as far away from 62nd St. as possible without seriously impacting existing wetlands. Additional access would be from the existing Linda Lane on the north. In the future, the site would access land to the south when that land develops. The goal is to design development of the land to the south to create a full intersection at Hodgson Rd. and Rohavic Lane. • • • On the west side of the plat, the internal road provides for future access to land along Hodgson Rd. When/if that land is redeveloped, access can be via the Ravens Hollow internal roads. This eliminates the need for new driveways onto Hodgson. All internal streets will be public roads built to City standards, 32 ft. street in a 60 ft. right of way. The westernmost street terminates at the property border. It is likely that Anoka County will require additional right of way dedication for Hodgson, probably 27 feet. This leaves 11 feet of the 38 ft. strip. This should be dedicated to the City to provide more land for a cul de sac to be constructed at the north tip of the street. This also will eliminate an odd strip of land between the County and City rights of way. Wetlands: Two small wetlands exist on the site, totaling 1.19 acre. The developer proposes to fill portions of the wetlands and mitigate (create replacement wetland) on the site. The proposed access road runs between them, resulting in minimal additional impact. The wetland mitigation plan is being reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Park Dedication: The current subdivision ordinance includes park dedication requirements, as adopted in 2001. Park dedication is $1665 per residential unit, less any land dedication. The Park Board recommends only cash for this project. This would calculate out to 56 units x $1665 = $93,240. The Board also considered a trail link between Lots 9 and 10, Block 4, in the northwest corner of the site, but staff believes this is not needed. A trail exists along the norther border of the property. This trail was constructed as part of the Fox Trace development. The record is unclear why it was constructed on property that is not within Fox Trace. There must be a clear right to the use of the trail, so an easement must be dedicated that covers the trail, or a trail corridor dedicated to the City. Either way, it should be credited to the park dedication and the value subtracted from the $93,240. Utilities. Sanitary sewer service is available via Linda Lane on the north side of the site. Water is available both in Linda Lane and Ware Road. This allows for a loop in the water service, a desirable situation. These utilities will be constructed to serve land to the south. Comments in the City Engineer memo of _date_ should be addressed to his satisfaction. Landscaping: There should be some landscaping installed on the western edge of Lot 1, Block 3. This will provide that lot some buffer for when/if Hodgson Road is widened. Lots backing on Ware Rd. will be separated/buffered from the road by 100+ feet of wetland and ponding. No monument sign or landscaping has been submitted. If a monument sign is planned, plans for the sign location, ownership, and maintenance must be submitted for City review and approval prior to City Council review of the preliminary plat/general development plan. Grading and Drainage: The grading and drainage related modifications and comments, as recommended by the City Engineer in the attached memorandum must be addressed to the City Engineer's satisfaction. The plan is also subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. Tree Preservation: A tree inventory has been submitted but a tree preservation plan is needed. The Environmental Specialist is working out the new requirements with the developer. A tree preservation plan shall be completed and reviewed prior to City Council review of the preliminary plat. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed several concept plans. At the April 30 meeting, the Environmental Board saw the concept for the plan being reviewed now. Their recommendations simply echoed their comments on the first plan. The "preservation area" referred to is a centeral area previously proposed to have a covenant over it to prevent homeowners from cutting trees. This is still possible, if the developer wants to include this in the private covenants. Most of the other recommendations are part of standard requirements. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • Staff recommends approval of the project with the following conditions attached: • 1. The applicant shall examine the readjustment of lot widths in Block 1 to increase lot areas as much as possible and move the house pad on Lot 1 to the south, away from the powerline. A revised preliminary plat showing this change shall be submitted prior to City Council review of the preliminary plat/general development plan. 2. Comments in the City Engineer memo of June 30, 2003 shall be addressed to his satisfaction. 3. If an area identification monument sign is planned, plans for the sign location, ownership, and maintenance must be submitted for City review and approval prior to City Council review of the preliminary plat/general development plan. 4. Right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County for Hodgson Road to total 60 feet from centerline. The remaining land along the 208 feet of internal road shall be dedicated to the City for right of way. 5. A tree preservation plan shall be completed and reviewed prior to City Council review of the preliminary plat. 6. A native seed mix shall be used in ponding and wetland areas. 7. A cul de sac shall be constructed with the greatest possible radius at the north end of the internal road on the west side of the project. 8. Park dedication shall be $93,240 less the agreed -upon value of a trail dedication along the northern edge of the site. This shall be clarified prior to final plat approval. 9. A permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to final plat approval. 10. Existing onsite septic systems and wells shall be properly abandoned according to law. • OPTIONS. 1. Approve the rezoning to residential PUD. 2. Approve allocation of 21 acres of MUSA reserve. 3. Approve the preliminary plat/PUD general development plan. 4. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Options 1, 2, and 3 This review is based on the following plans and information: City Engineer Comments dated July 2, 2003 Public Services Director Comments (Park Board), April 17, 2003 Environmental Board Comments, March 31 and May 9, 2003 Certificate of Survey, revised and received April 4, 2003 Preliminary Plat, June 16, 2003 Preliminary Utility Plan, revised June 12, received June 17, 2003 Preliminary Grading, Drainage, Erosion Plan, revised June 13, received June 17, 2003 • TKDA wENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Ravens Hollow 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: June 30, 2003 Comm. No. 12701 -002 Routing: This proposed Ravens Hollow development was last reviewed in a memorandum dated March 26, 2003. The following review is based upon revised documents received as follows: 1. Preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet 1 of 2), Ravens Hollow, KG Development, prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies, dated February 21, 2003, and revised June 16, 2003. 2. Preliminary Plat of Ravens Hollow, prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies, dated February 13, 2003, and revised June 16, 2003. 3. Preliminary Utility Plan (Sheet 1 of 3) dated February 13, 2003, and revised June 16, 2003. 4. Notes and Details Sheet (Sheet 2 of 2) dated January 20, 2003, and revised June 16, 2003. 5. Drainage Calculations dated June 16, 2003. The proposed Ravens Hollow project development consists of the construction of 56 single - family and 30 townhome lots, located between CSAH 49 and Ware Road at 62nd Street. The size of the property proposed for development is 22 acres, and is generally flat and undulating with combinations of pasture, woodland areas, and wetlands. Some existing single - family residences are located along CSAH 49. An existing bicycle trail also traverses just within and parallel to the north property line, connecting CSAH 49 to the intersection of Ware Road and 62nd Street. The following review comments are presented based on the information provided: Comments - General 1. In the previous review, it was recommended that construction access to and from the site be confined to Ware Road, or from TH 49, to eliminate construction traffic on neighboring residential streets such as Linda Lane. A construction (and permanent) entrance from Ware Road is shown on the revised plan. 2. The proposed plans (including streets, utilities, and drainage) should consider future development of the property to the south as much as possible, as it is likely that future development will connect to at least some of the Ravens Hollow infrastructure. All proposed work shall be in conformance with the comprehensive plans of the City of Lino Lakes. It is required that a temporary cul -de -sac or turnaround feature be provided for the short dead end at the southwest part of the property. Existing An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • • • Ravens Hollow Review Page 2 June 30, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota watermain pressures should also be reviewed to ascertain whether resulting dead -end lines will have adequate pressures and flow rates for domestic use as well as fire protection. 3. On all plans provided, the streets shown must be provided with names /identifications. Detailed review comments are difficult to reference without such identification. 4. The proposed development shows a connection to Ware Road at the southeast corner of the site. As mentioned in the previous review, the City was considering the possibility of this connection being temporary, pending further review of future development to the south of this property. Unless the City directs otherwise, it is recommended that the proposed connecting street at Ware Road remain in place. 5. The plan provides for the construction of the start of a frontage road alongside CSAH 49 at the southwest corner of the property. The proposed development plans will require further review, input, and approval of Anoka County. 6. A 70 foot wide U.P.A. Easement exists across the northern portion of the property. The size of the proposed lots bordering this easement should be reviewed further to verify that City requirements (including minimum lot depths) are met. In addition, a trail easement (north 30) feet should also be provided on the final plat if a trail easement has not already been dedicated. 7. The numbering of the utility and grading sheets needs clarification and revision. Of these plans, a total of three (3) sheets have been provided. The utility plan is identified as Sheet 1 of 3, the grading plan as Sheet 1 of 2, and the detail plan as Sheet 2 of 2. 8. A Wetland Delineation Report, prepared by Earth Science Associates, Inc., and dated November 2002, was previously provided as part of the earlier (March 26, 2003) submittal. This Report, along with the proposed Wetland Replacement Plan (including any subsequent revisions), shall be subject to review and approval of the City, and the approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District. 9. As part of the March 26, 2003 submittal, a Geotechnical Assessment (Geotechnical Engineering, Inc., February 19, 2003) was also provided. Based upon the results and opinion of the geotechnical engineer, the site does have some limitations with regard to suitability for construction, primarily in areas where the topsoil and fill are much deeper. In such areas where houses or infrastructure such as roads and utilities are proposed, unsuitable material would need to be removed and replaced and compacted accordingly. Groundwater levels naturally can fluctuate. Careful consideration of groundwater levels should be considered when proposing the type of housing unit to be constructed, such as a walk -out or full basement. 10. Any on -site wells not to be used in the future shall be formally abandoned in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. • • • Ravens Hollow Review Page 3 June 30, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan and Drainage Calculations The following comments are provided as part of our review of the grading and drainage: 1. The grading note "Silt fence to be maintained during grading" shall read "Silt fence to be maintained until approved removal by City Engineer." 2. The grading note "Adhere to minimum opening or basement elevation for each lot" shall read "Adhere to minimum opening and basement elevation for each lot." 3. The grading note "Ponds and wetlands may be ... -soil source & material to approved by City Engineer" shall read "Ponds and wetlands may be ... -soil source & material to be approved by City Engineer." 4. The grading note "Developer shall use Tufturf..." shall read "Developer shall use Tuffturf or equivalent..." 5. A storm manhole must be added between STMH -20A and FES -21, so that FES -21 can be aligned 90 degrees to the wetland edge. In addition, it appears that there is a conflict between the two storm sewer lines at this location. A review of the storm sewer design at this location is therefore recommended. 6. In addition to the typical single - family lot detail showing perimeter drainage and utility easements, the easements should also be shown on the plat itself for all lots. In addition, it is strongly recommended that the City require a wider side lot easement (10 feet rather than 5 feet) where the proposed storm sewer is planned. Drainage and utility easements shall also be shown on the plat over all storm sewers not in public right -of -way or pond drainage easements. 7. Existing and proposed 100 -year flood elevations must be submitted for the wetlands. The proposed flood elevation shall be shown on the Grading Plan. 8. Existing and proposed curve numbers are acceptable. 9. Supporting computations are needed for all "Direct Entry" Time of Concentration values. 10. Pond P1 is modeled as twin 12 -inch pipes, but the grading plan only shows one 15 -inch pipe. 11. Storm sewer computations must be submitted. 12. Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is required. As part of the March 2003 submittal, a permit application and plans were reviewed by the RCWD. At that time, the RCWD had issued a conditional approval pending receipt of changes and outstanding items further described in Permit Application No. 03 -019. The application also contained terms and conditions regarding a Wetland Replacement Plan. An updated review and approval by the RCWD based on the most recent plan set must be provided. • 17. A 2.0 -foot minimum cover over all storm sewer i e is required. PP q Ravens Hollow Review Page 4 June 30, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 13. All drainage from this site falls within the drainage area of Baldwin Lake in accordance with the City's Surface Water Management Plan. The majority of the site's drainage is proposed to flow to the southeast part of the site, and into a wetland that extends into the property to the south. The 100 -year elevation of the wetland, as well as the 100 -year elevations proposed for the development site ponding, must clearly be shown to assure that water does not exceed or overtop Ware Road. All emergency overflow locations and elevations must also be clearly shown to assure that proposed housing elevations are safely above projected flood levels. 14. The proposed pond along Ware Road (at the rear of Lots 3, 4, and 5) appears to discharge to a Wetland along Ware Road. The wetland outlet and emergency overflows are not defined or identified on the plan. 15. It is assumed that the legend and grading notes on Sheet 2 correspond to Sheet 1. As part of standard practice, such notes are typically provided on the same sheet. It is suggested the notes either be shown on Sheet 1, or referenced accordingly. 16. Sheet 1 is very cluttered with numbers and details over much of the plan (too close to each other or on top of each other), thus making it difficult to fully review. The plan must be cleaned up in order to be acceptable. 18. The following notes must be added or revised as follows: • A note shall be added, stating that any fill material, topsoil, or soils imported to the site must be approved by the City Engineer. The source of the material must also be provided to the City Engineer. • An additional note must be added stating that all permit requirements of the RCWD must be adhered to. • All grading shall be confined to the property. No additional runoff from the site shall enter upon neighboring properties. If grading requires any work into the adjoining property, the Contractor shall be responsible for attaining authorization as needed. • The proposed backyard draining of many of the house units, particularly along the north, south, and west sides of the property must be addressed further to assure that additional drainage is not being added to neighboring properties. Utility Plan • 1. The plan proposes connecting an 8 -inch water pipe to an existing 12 -inch line at Linda Lane. Further review by the City should be conducted to verify that further extension of the 12 -inch size into or through the property is not needed. • Ravens Hollow Review Page 5 June 30, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 2. The plan proposes connecting an existing 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer at Linda Lane. Further review is being conducted to verify that sewer extensions proposed are in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Sanitary sewer should be placed at the centerline of the street with the water offset 10 -feet. The 10- foot offset must be clearly labeled on the plan. 4. The utility plan is labeled as Sheet 1 of 3. This needs to be clarified or revised (see General Comments). 5. No individual water or sewer services are shown on the plans. All services, including references to City standards for service pipe and appurtenances, must be provided. 6. Applicable City of Lino Lakes standard plates for all sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer fixtures (i.e., valves, manholes, hydrants, etc.) must be provided on a separate detail sheet. Preliminary Plat 1. The preliminary plat will require review by Anoka County. 2. A future connection between Ware Road and CSAH 49 at this location does not appear to be present per the City's long range plans, but should be verified. In the event a future connection at this location is desired, appropriate dedications should be provided on the preliminary plat as needed. This could include an extension of 62nd Street or connecting to CSAH 49 at the southwest corner of the site. 3. Drainage and wetland easements will be required to cover all wetland and ponding areas as proposed. The preliminary plat appears to address this item. 4. A typical detail is provided on the preliminary plat, showing a typical configuration for drainage and utility easements for each lot. This is acceptable, however, the easement lines should also be shown on the plat itself over all properties. 5. A trail easement shall be dedicated across the northerly 30 feet of the property. • Lino Lakes Public Services Department 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 982 -2440 Fax (651) 982 -2439 • • April 17, 2003 TO: Jeff Smyser, City Planner n FROM: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director SUBJECT: Ravens Hollow Preliminary Plat The Park Board reviewed the Preliminary Plat for Ravens Hollow at the April 7, 2003 Park Board Meeting. Mr. Rocky Goertz, Developer, was present to discuss the plat and respond to member's questions. After a lengthy discussion it was the consensus of the Park Board to accept 100% cash dedication for the park dedication fee. The Park Board also determined a trail connecting the existing trail along the southern edge of Fox Trace to the northwesterly road of Ravens Hollow be considered. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 651 982 -2444. sw /rick/Ravens Hollow Preliminary Plat — Smyser Memo.doc • Memorandum To: Michael Grochala CC: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: March 31, 2003 Re: The following comment and recommendations were made at the March 28, 2003 Environmental Board Meeting: Environmental Board Comment: The Environmental Board endorses this project because the developer is willing to preserve open space, even though it falls short of the Environmental Board goals of conservation development. The Environmental Board endorses this development because of the developers willingness and commitment to preserve as much open space as possible without the high density normally required for these projects in this zoning district. Environmental Board Recommendations: 1. An attempt should be made to round -off or soften the edges of preservation areas, in order to make them appear more natural. 2. Preserve as many significant trees as possible. Developer should work with the City Forester to accomplish this. 3. There should be restrictions in Homeowner Association By -laws restricting the removal of vegetation in preservation areas. 4. Ravens Hollow should be spelled Ravens' or Raven's Hollow. 5. Staff Recommendations should be followed. 1 • • • April2, 2003 Staff Recommendations: 1. Care should be taken to allow normal surface -water flow to the flood plain area, South and East of the development. 2. Engineers should confirm there is adequate separation between the bottom of ponds and infiltration areas, and post - development seasonally high ground water tables. 3. Maintenance access should be provided to all preservation and infiltration areas proposed. 4. Developer will be responsible for the control of all tree diseases in this development. This area was controlled for oak wilt in the fall of 2002. 5. No soil disturbance shall occur in this development until a tree preservation plan has been developed, approved by the City, and implemented by the developer. 6. All surface -water treatment areas should be protected from compaction by fencing after initial shaping. 7. The Cities native mix should be used in all infiltration and surface -water treatment areas. This seed mix can be applied immediately with traditional quick -start soil - stabilization seed mix. 8. No soils should be exported or imported on this project with out approvals from the City. 9. The developer would provide escrow dollars for one 2 to 2.5 inch boulevard tree per lot frontage. Motion by O'Dea, second by Halen to recommend approval of Ravens Hollow with above recommendations of Staff and Environmental Board. All were in favor. Motion passed. 2 May 9, 2003 Environmental Staff Recommendations /Discount Tires 1. All surface water issues for Discount Tire oved Company an s for Market veace.d to be in conformance with previously approved p A trail on the North side of the property ndsca not rig indicated needs to address plan. ra I Landscaping is shown over this area p and visibility issues for both pedestrians pedesti ara OPTED. Lower profile materials considered sea (Or provide clumping of the in -line dogwo o ds along Lake Drive, leaving periodic openings) Landscaping should conform to the original intent of Market Place. Proposed landscaping shows three less d Within the of an plan. for Junipers proposed adjacent to streets and should be lower profile (2 -3 feet high) a and salt tolerant. There should be more shade trees planted along Markeshrubs t proposed sodded areas must be irrigated. All roductsnc'ons stentfw th other should be mulched with organic, earth-toned p Market Place Areas. Some of the lighting fixtures proposed for Discount Tire are inconsistent with City standards. Motion to approve, motion passed with all in favor. Ravens Hollow Motion to approve based on last months Environmental Board recommendation. Motion passed with all in favor. • 414 2 • • • mIMLI.0 I_ rklalnV ©ti;c__ , morn= mrEm.mom i. 11,7,11 to 'AlitidARA imp :NE20.05mai IAA MI • v0. ®4100 1111h . =�� OVA EWA Elm 111111K1 s Pln Uri EIISI! G realki4 Xi mum& O"01 ��PINE e'=471N Walin mum atitione deg-me oo m�E ANOKA COUNTY VEY DRAWN SEP. 1974 REVISED JAN. 987 REVISED NOV. 1978 REV. MAY 988 REV. MAR.I980 REV. AUG. 989 REV. SEP.1981 REV. FEB. 991 REV. DEC.1982 REV. FEB. 992 REV. JULY 1985 REV. FEB. 993 REV. DEC. 1985 REV. MAY 994 SCALE I" = 1500' REVISED REV. REV, REV. REV. REV. REV. REK 0 1/4 1/2 MILE NOV. 1994 JAN. 1996 JULY 1997 JULY 1998 AUG. 1999 SEPT. 2000 MAY 2001 JULY 2002 3/4 LOCATION MAP • COMA le-Aerf 0) pie' Ahif (04 e /900 ASH ST ASH ST ACH ST ASH ST ,40,(//40a0 • • RECEIVED LEGAL DESCRIPTION AllitpultdietlYPIMANOWellablbilealea Ittosolleslalloaaperpletlimededlendaremolleals 9i9arf9ltaesedOudeia /rArYOtaglibassO.Delis r9trYeYiY*rM1ba1ili4k istastatb anta9rt4iadollLtlaaraaelldogrYi9dd14elMjMtbaar��iYr in � [la etteatarMrt�t4lr��yaiai t .lLtl Y s9.1IR AedaCLayLlionerlreitr true Y*ragatapYtltarlwl atedIT MOD• to /iawOSYarli esersotrdrtlsSrn9 rtatrlt�fSfafaellta /WttK/ftYRi9�tlaeluUL�k a�iy►a r/aY raillOgl rt8YrrIIaartillattarrlarrpYerriLYf, b1fABttr2idBKtrf9r8iteff 9RoiatQ99lrrtr[9irtQalrtidle•SL ANIMA 011i k1. +]iihrRAa4Ceeig, flsseekaw49arLttLYIfY WrYlali 117. 50 =3 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: RAVENS HOLLOW _ �� (- ()x Trace FT. 8111186 OUS TRAIL AtS4 -3 RIM:909.33 IIV138723 1 9°13'01"E 05 38 91135 TNH JUN 1 6 2003 OJT OF LINO (rAKE�S ill M� 1m1� / P, Nt(_ OE E OE _,L- OE 1 T -6/ AND I /�02• / 9�a/ r / �/ / I on/ / / Ala I / I I 0,e wlreip�ea / osi3alrtr�l4txariatGarrYe6faasasaarYa A II Sop T tfatLtll1.- Diltia7 6111, aslefrra *a3leaattalattnrr4rieet rle/ectAr6YatarAsiallo liaakaaYYitY /YraintigAritlatetlaa E C1mmallfareaerretr a+ tltitpillaellarflataarlfafrtaMLtIkriYlA 1 YYeiar11ta1rtlaello waYdt:irasieni4 Wa.ailms tieaiaAerarY YsalrraALraet7tt1rea /paaiRaaaNsilearpata/irw(alraritLe M Yrearae * M1. 373186{ art sWyareRetar /atlrrlYarti/Lewrrarrwati/lidrs alarrtiiaaAlsa asal•arrrrpYS•eeaumeeL ills retYYttlaai/ Adln \aiaeitgalaYrrYaiarr7grrteql•l gatedYerllet► ailosLr4radLID4e ig1111alstirmadISDetirnel .kboa2gatp27L 9069 OE Thera allheNedmelleolleselbellirlottbreelledom31,,Ta ilt31,ltrkltr3lirtiArirta Mem ClaaaaftrNertta me teiiledaNiaretrareaarre sammlig/a.ita rlOdlaataY ridataaaet/ddhileg tlir /iaaeagitt/ta/Yraltfitat a ossmel olO iaeraayadrrwletaetasY >wdatQatretr gesimileralblusg4001675616181989118,119.9195611eadiew1111111WiliaaaftlinlospliMI8 ltw/ arlYalatwtaraa4 .aetrsialaairIlbq trYaaYiea 1 dY 'sa['a ti:L a':tpte � d• 1a,,elial-slar 9 irrtalimdltrrtYraletrOtrylrrrtr4alb :Ar4CLry1Hela / 4 r °r / 97� / 11 17,431.5 I (11,479 •\ ft 29,554.3 eq. 8. \ \(1472q R) J l Y MiYtlttlYdYtt lltdrtQatrtr/ rirt Qattr/ttaU.OneiyMlYllyr3LMil/ lllifladela a/ad Oureelesellollmarmiseamellhelfeetometlambranollollool4DemmllselesSIAmerlip31,,IImpill l melealkagrwtrlemete/Itarerlflt771 t.NipYttereaihOwisetaYlratara / 0,aLafallMeolholharteW0, /ameretMlrCtan/esialarm/5375A i plliairwlatretilaliR/ aawYa21L3Y0,fbirYrlYdrtaYadaiiael ek etiaai � rtleOiesa�artr/ eereaQaeretdtallaairnetIO3M11YrpYe iya morie1 it33atarrtarPiYwellesmfetaWNIOn rearaYtatytt oral 2.1W a. N2 a VICINITY MAP a eaE meat. 91191E FM&Y tar 6r- 2 16 8 • our( FA90pRa_ --1e1MN woe lK-� mmiam•r0T C// 1410050 Ft ( 106 Fe) . WAWA= lA1D 106' 6R 16'1 commit X96 "'134r9Ef0r� -< Teecm. tae 8OOr ,Or Cutout 201668 AREA) 8 a 10 w .7') 1 8 1 S / `(f / /N89°13' 01'w 264.30 902.7 11 11. 907.' z \0L) 907.8) 44' 1 8,887.0 q R ( &887 45. R) Ewalt x - • 9069 Owner /Developer KG DEVELOPMENT INC. 360th Street North Branch, MN 55056 PHONE (651) 674 -8034 1 1 - E 1/4 L �' , u 31 OE m 42,5467 q ft (10,589 q. ft) 12 OE OE OE 9017 giv i 43 804.6 / 16,502.5 q )00,867 (10,867 q Hose / B09 x ( 6 \ 30,017.4 eq. ft. 1 W \ \ (25,274 q R.) 1 _ 9 - N °g F� 1 M; \ o� 1 Y 2 a / 809.7 \8 15,007.5 q ft,,,, .� (1$008 q ft) •' °5 I 65 9069 -9 X907.8"1 1 9092 9062 ) / I (\ / (111 2 x) \� `� / / / 9011 250 Y43 HP r 12963 q. ft 8 20,832.9 q 17,818.2 q ft 9066 (12 -947 q ft) 11.5 8 1 1.1 16.00 q ft \" (10.81X ✓q ft) / \ Y / 907.1 / (V 911.0.1 �I 141 Y 1I I 1 r- �9�7 � 1 J 81■ 19x13 13,12141 q tt /9126\,, / 1 \ (13.324 ) _Y j %,r //1 i W1r _ .- -1 \ \ -- _ __I� f�11 \. - ..._ ___ , I 107710 R \\, Ii 1 1 / 1 'L /33 I 1 //19.591.4 g8. (10497 q ft) 1 0 (20.833 q /20,649 q. ft.) 1 10,819.2 R (10.620 at. ft) i 135 901.2 1 ) _ 1 I ✓// € 8� 1 714 er 4771 q R) 1 I 5 / 3 / =V �ii 21,0263 g R �a 8 J n 0 1S5 9049 1 ) (ia709 q IL) / j' I -'11_1 1 / -8. ' � 2 -I r 1 8964 11a, x 1 I / r I x91V 12K`?- 9 904.8 / k i r J Y J 11,6424 q. R 01,842 q ft) 7,i19-/7,Ji 90 °46gRI WETLAND (11,313 q MI 1� 6 $ HP1• 1 I 7 _ -898- 4 19,751.1 p. R (9,922 q R) 136 0,U Easarnent9 2 7�412f1_tgL (7,413 �. ft) Y Rood Eeefllrt 904.9 be be Yom " t.40 908. 17 /F 6,000.0/Iq R K (5.393 ft) 1 \ (21,117 q R) 111 50 50 2_ 3 e e. \• 0,.. a x= \-- �� 904.4 I LP LP I- 150 8,000.0 q :-6,000.0 g ft 8 000.0, q ft (6.000 q iR (0.000 q ) (6,000 1.) y obi 9 TT 1 1 /1 / 50 10 \ 60 8,000 (8. _12_ 11 k 10 902{ 8 6,0060 q R (6,000 q� 8,000.0 q ft (6,000 q R) 901.5 7277.3 .oft 902'' (8,162 q ft) \ / / 22 I \\ \ 699./ I ( J \ 7 / (T14.A8. O g q R ft ) / ) 0,8 1 5967 1 \ I / 899.8 \ / r L 4:". � X808 50 60 900.8 Or 897.9 �. LP 29z 50 , 60 5 6\ 8,000.0 . R (6,000 q ft ft 901.0 898.5 ▪ "9 / a-- 0. Ilea of 0 1/2, N 1/2 897.1 7,200.0 eq. R (7.200q IV \ w0,4aed 2 0,700.0 q ft 6,000.0. (6,000 q ft) (8,000 q R) I .0 a Y4 /5 6 7 8 9 / p,16 6. 0 q R 6,00S0 g ft 6,000.0 q ft. 6,000.0 q R. 8,000.0 q ft 89,9K4400-6 • WETLAND 1 9 f R 9 R 8 R e, App •q ft (8,000 . ft) (e,r q ft) (6,000 . ft) (6.000 q R) (8.000 .q. ft) �6 � (8'` - 8 ... 8 /y3� ( 8A7�O �7rI'LO A k 8967 \ 37,577.1 q R Drainage and Utlky Ease-sent ( 898.3 896.7 x 6968 888▪ .9 -898- B9B x Ditch 1 8962 899.1 898'2 1 AREA BREAKDOWN TOTAL LOTS = 56 LOTS PLUS ONE OUTLOT 26 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 30 TOWNHOME LOTS 9 NOTE: PROPOSED ZONING, FOLLOW THE CHAPTER 1000, SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING GUIDE1JNES. ?l+t� 1 1320.87 N89'04'35 "W I / 1 � _ LEGEND -iW -- DENOTES E)OS11140 CONTOUR DENOTES TREE UNE • AD) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION 000.0 DENOTES 090114G ELEVATION -0 DENOTES 0057610 POSER POLE O DENOTES SANITARY SEVER MANHOLE - OE - DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC O DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT 1 Ike of N 1/2, N 1/2 of 5 1/2. NE 1/4, SE 1/4 GRAPHIC SCALE SO ale a WO (mom) -900- I- i 1 hereby certify that thle survey, purl or report was prepared by me or under my direct auperN9bn and that lam 0 duly Registered Land Surveyor under the lard f the State of Minnesota Date Reglatr0tion No. 18213 7 7 4 ant .HEY sr. ALL Ar r0,r Join No. 01514 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE Loj OE OE OE OE x 00f0 00 0 OE 9 (NFM ) 1 inch - 80 1t FT. BITUMINOUS TRAIL CONNECT TO 005110 12 WATER AN MTH a REDUCER +91. 8 I 800 7 -50 7 +00 OE OE / / 10 OE OE OE OE / 11• 13 15 12 E 1/4 cot. See. 31 0 � 0)401 910.0 903.0 FB 910.0 911.5 904.5 FB w/Dc 911.5 909.5 '911.5 9F F w/oc 911.5 909.5 \ / / 910.5 903.5 FB w/o< 910.5 908 5 910.0 903.0 FB wino 910.0 908 0 I 10007.84 714. um. 811.43 to 0 .-03coi 0)4.00,00) 3 Os U)OOo en N 0 m O O 0)4.00 2 ZJA9.5 914.5 FBW wins 904.5 908.4 4 - 909.5 I 911.5 FBLO w/oc1 904.5 908.0 ?� 908.5 910.5 FBLO wick 903.5 / 907.0 7 oommo 004.0 0 0 rn \ +40.485'613 L . CUT: :8 8D7. 97. 08 00 0 0 0 0 0) / / O m 0 0 ON .)' Oi E 40 06 Muff 0454E 5 8 2 O O 0 0 0 000 O O m o) L, 0 0 0 0 ri a131) oomo 01 0 1287.42 L 11 1) 669612 ai 0)0)10)10011 5 1 • 8.05 800.66 V : 890 000.6 1 0 906.0 907.5 \ FBL O w/Dc 7 900.5 904.0 E • 90 90 FB 90 90 1 L5 / 908.0 .5 909._ 0 w FBLO > w .5 / 902.0 .0 - 905.5 21 3 3 4 906.0 906,0 � / 902.5 902.5 FBLO Yyno' FBLO voc 09 90915 0 908.0 6. 9025 FB O A/n" 908.0 9�1D0.0 101. "I 1 0 / 9075 / 907.0 FBLO woo FBLO 901.5 901.0 905.0 904.5 4 5 906.5 907 FBLO vn 900.5 904.0 6 • 905.5 902.0 FBLO 909 908.0 905.5 902.0 FBLO 909 905.5 902.0 FBLO 905.5 902.0 FBLO 0 909 908.0 908.0 3 1 OE •1. ■ 4 / / 6 0000 N0)31.1 0 o m 0 CA 01t.rn 7 \\ WETLAND I SLIFEMCEWEAR MERAND 1 MAY E%1RA 101019 STS F06 9811811 1c 1-g5 35 P1� I ;3243 ti 0 0 .,S e • SSE/---S o STA 7411.96 6.11 4 - + + I +I r 8 0 00 5 +13 3 ,Old: 89182 + NV. 118 89 . OUT: Id LL \ 1 08698E MH11 STA 11 +17..3 TO 905.95 NV. am 894.29 907.5 FBLO 900.5 904.0 907. FBLO 900.7 904.2 908.0 FBLO 901.0 904.5 908.0 FBLO 901.0 904.5 907.5 FBLO 900.5 04.0 907.0 FBLO 900.0 903.5 906.5 FB 903.0 903.0\ / 7\ 8 9 \ / ZSAZN / 4P40CA8LP 5 NV. 906.0 FBLO 899.0 902.5 861.30 CON WET TAP I I-- s- �1J-1 - -I-4- 0 8 0 WETLAND / SLIF010E NEAR WEIA4D MAY REOUNE EXTRA LEN01N STAKES FOR HIGH WATER111 OUTLOTA 1 0 • • RECEIVED JUN 62003 CITY OF LINO LAKES UTILITY NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE 8" SDR 35 PVC 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE 4" PVC SCH 40 3. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE 8" DIP CL52 4. GATE VALVES SHALL BE MUELLER A- 2370 -20 W /MECHANICAL JOINTS, MEETING AWWA SPECIFICATIONS C500 -61 VALVE BOXES SHALL BE MUELLER H -10357 W/H -10361 DROP LID AND EXTENSIONS SHALL BE MUELLER H -10363 6. WATERMAIN TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8' OF COVER 7. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN CROSSINGS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION 8. LINO LAKE UTILITY SUPT. MUST BE CONTACTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO UTILITY WORK, WORK IN ROW OR UTILITY CONNECTIONS 9. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF LINO LAKES, CEAM, MDH AND MPCA 10. EXISITNG UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIAMTE WAY ONLY 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISITNG UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK 12. HE OR SHE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISITNG UTILITIES 13. GOPHER STAT ONE CALL: TWIN CITY AREA (651) 454 -0002 MN TOLL FREE (800) 252 -1166 5. REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK ON WARE ROAD 1. ALL BITUMINOUS MUST BE SAWCUT TO FULL DEPTH 2. TRAFFIC CONTROL MUST BE PROVIDED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF MUTCD 3. THE CITY UTILITY AND STREET SUPERINTENDENTS MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF WARE ROAD OR WORK ON CITY FACILITIES 4. THE STREET MUST BE RESTORED TO THE FULL SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES EL GEND 8" SDR 35 PVC SANITARY SEWER 8" DIP CL52 WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE HYDRANT li WV GATE VALVE ix O EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES DELINEATED WETLANDS SS SS 1 I 1 FIRE COVERAGE CIRCLE 1 I 1 I .'. i OE 3 OE (I.-HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ` PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISOR AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERS[ PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA W.A.T. MGCULLY DATE: REG. N0.231 / PRELIMINARY GR A DING; - DRAINA AND LER @S'OCNT IOL / GRAPHIC SCALE 909 60 0 b m 100 100 Fox Trace 5 FT. BITUMINOUS TRAIL 911 911.55 TNN I17 \9 \ / 'E 1/4 cor. Sec. 31 / YCTxx 11. 1WP. 1L VICINITY -1I ea 906.3 8 J 902.7 REMOVE OR DEMO FENCE WHERE NEEDED (TYP.) 906.2 cA 2 -12I SEDIMENT LOGS (T7 ) WETLAND SILTFENCE NEAR WETLAND MAY REQUIRE EXTRA LENGTH STAKES FOR HIGH WATERIII � 172 L_L � , WHY. cant r• / /i�'I�q Mxcen 02.70 MH 9110.06 N PVC F I I 1 C-1-3 CV w r{ Iret w CITY OF LINO LAKES 0.74 ROCK CONSTRUC110N ENTRANCE WTI. sos.s�� IO' /P IM1 00, 903A t4 yak muleA WETLAND FES11 W /tlUIE 1101 000.0 SILTFENCE NEAR WETLAND MAY REQUIRE EXTRA LENGTH STAKES FOR HIGH WATERII{1 897.3 1 bUTLOT A \ 896 \ \90 `O 9\ _ I °6\ \-906 -- 7 _ —904— —902. SILTFENCE (TTP.) TO SERVE AS CONSTRUCTION OMITS WHERE APPUCABLE —900— — 7 ME 0 Y DEEP BOX 01149T EICM W /4.0 C Q31 PoPRAP 10P CF WALL 8011.06 001L 1107.13 (61111--W) BOY OF CUIPERT:1054 (SEE OETAL SHEET) 1 2 4 KNEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ` PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERNSION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTEREE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA W.A.T. MXCULLY DATE 000. N0.2j1 / z -w LEGEND \0 -� ALT FENCE SF SF EDIMENT LOG RIP-RAP Mi TUFF TURF. EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 906.4 EXISTING CONTOUR - - - -896- - - - PROPOSED CONTOUR---(896) PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION X895.69 WETLAND EDGE AND D WETLAND FILL NEW WETLAND CREDIT PUBLIC VALUE CREDIT DRAINAGE ARROWS NI* FBWO -FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT FBLO -FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT FB -FULL BASEMENT W /DG -WITH DROPPED GARAGE TYPICAL HOUSE PAD WINDOW LOOKOUT ELEVATION BASE ELEVATION reeei 891.50 888.00 FBLO 895.00 888.00 FBWO 895.00 -TAILS TBEFEIRF INSTALLATION AT EMERGENCY BERM OVERFLOWS AND DITCHES EMERGENCY BERM BOTTOM WIDTH - EFT OVERLAP MATERIAL r PM STAPLE EVERY 12 ALONG SUMS AND EDGE; BURY LEADING EDGE 6' AT NIL =V.. Smia. - PE VIDE SLOPE L61i1V STACK TUFFTURF • S 0.G 1 " ♦Fr STARE TVFFTURF ALL MT }AY TO TEE BOTTOM OF THE 017VH ION POINT STAKE TUFFTURF • S O.0. BURY TOP LEADING EDGE 6' DEEP UNDER RD' -RAP OF I OVERLAP MATERIAL 6' LONGITUDINALY AND STAPLE EYXRY L2' ALONG SEAMS DITCH BOTTOM IIIDTH - 60 INCHES WITH SEW SIDE SLOPES OR GREATER BASEMENT /WALKOUT ELEVATION 895.00 888.00 FB REAR OPENING BASEMENT ELEVATION GARAGE ELEVATION GARAGE ELEVATION GARAGE ELEVATION 893.00 (1' OR 2' DROPPED GARAGE TYP.) • HOUSES WITH DROPPED GARAGES ARE INTENDED TO REDUCE DRIVEWAY GRADE TO 10% OR LESS GRADING NOTES AND SEQUENCING .ALT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED DOWNHILL FROM ANY OF THE GRADING ACTIVITY FIELD DECISIONS TO BE MADE REGARDING PLACEMENT OF SILT FENCE CLEARING AND GRUBBING TO BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2101 BEGIN STIPPING TOPSOIL IN RIGHT OF WAY SEDIMENT POND SHALL HAVE A SACRIFICIAL FOREBAY AT INLET TO CAPTURE SEDIMENT LOAD SITEWORK SHALL BEGIN ONCE SILT FENCE IS INSTALLED CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OFF WARE ROAD SILT FENCE TO BE MAINTAINED DURING GRADING STAKED SEDIMENT LOGS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE PLAN SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF FINAL DISTURBANCE SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE MNDOT SPEC. 3876, MIXTURE 7, AT A RATE OF 35 PLS Lbs /ACRE OR MNDOT SPEC. 500 AT A RATE OF 50 PLS Lbs /ACRE MULCH RATE SHALL BE 2 TONS PER ACRE ADHERE TO MINIMUM OPENING OR BASEMENT ELEVATION FOR EACH LOT CONTRACTOR TO USE RCP STORM SEWER IN ROW AND HDPE STORM SEWER IN GREEN SPACE RIP —RAP SHALL BE CLASS III PER MNDOT 3133C PONDS AND WETLANDS MAY BE LINED WITH NATIVE TOPSOIL OR HYDRIC SOILS FROM ANY SITE (SOIL MUST BE FREE OF INVASIVE SPECIES) —SOIL SOURCE & MATERIAL TO APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER POND BENCHES SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT MIX 25A OR CITY OF LINO LAKES SEE SPEC. AS APPLICABLE WETLAND MITIGATION AREAS TO SEEDED WITH MNDOT MIX 25B, SECTION 3876.2, 2000 EDITION, PG 1049 OR CITY OF LINO LAKES SEE SPEC. AS APPLICABLE FILL MATERIAL FOR ROADS AND HOUSE PAD CAN BE OBTAINED FROM ANY WHERE WITHIN THE SITE GRANULAR MATERIALS IF FOUND ON SITE CAN BE USED FOR ROAD BUILDING AND PAD FILL ANY EXISTING SITE GRANULAR MATERIALS TO BE USED AS ROADWAY OR BUILDING PAD FILL MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER DEVELOPER SHALL USE TUFFTURF IF A HIGH VELOCITY BLANKET IS NEEDED IN HIGH EROSION CHANNELS PAD SITES ARE ONLY PROPOSED, MIN. BSMT ELEV. SHALL BE ADHERED TO 011N. BSMT ELEV. SHALL BE A MIN. OF 2' ABOVE 100 YEAR POND ELEVATIONS MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY GRADE OF 10% DEVELOPER AND BUILDER HAS OPTION OF PLACING THE HOUSE WITHIN THE LOT WETLAND DELINEATION APPROVED BY RCWD PER LETTER DATE NOVEMBER 20, 2002 AN NPDES GRADING PERMIT IS REQUIRED CONTACT WILLIAM MCCULLY, P.E. AT GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES AT (763) 784 -0657 895.00 SEDIMENT LOG CHECK LOCATED PER PLAN moos aF R:fI D412 CURB TYPICAL CY /LF = 0.0494 LF /CY = 20.2 BOX CULVERT BCW FEN 6' MINIMUM DEPTH - Y WISHED ROCK 18' MINIMUM OJT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE MAINTAIN ROCK ENTRANCE IF TRACKING BEGINS ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PS8 co O ROW 30' OF ROAD 30' ROW 14' 16' 14' 24" 14' L 1 1/2" 2341 Bituminous Wear, Placed after one winter 2 2331 Bituminous Base, Tack Coat 5" Aggregate Base 100% Crushed Recycled Class 5 24" Select Granular Borrow, 514 Mod. D412 4" of native topsoil and turf establishment. Seed, mulch and disc anchor remaining R/W J TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STREET SECTION FL- 30' —FL BOC- 32' —BOC 1 4" PVC /ADS dralnfile w /sock as shown on plans between CBs and along bottom of select °Recyled aggregate for base must meet class 5 specification (I-HEREBY CERTI Y THAT TNI PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTEREE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA W.A.T. McCIILLY ` DATE: EEG. NO.$3i.3a / CHECKED WATM DATE 01 -20 -03 VERf GAL SCALE HOE¢. J08 NO. 02522 • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V. C. Jeff Smyser July 9, 2003 Haley Manor • Comprehensive Plan Amendment: - Change Land Use From Low Density Unsewered to Low Density Sewered Residential, and - Obtain Additional MUSA Reserve and Allocate MUSA • Rezone From Rural to R -1 • Preliminary Plat • Variance for Lot Depth Frank Feela, Inc. has requested approval of the Haley Manor plat. This project is unusual in that it involves redevelopment of four existing residential lots in the Mar Don Acres neighborhood. The project is driven by the desire of the existing homeowners to divide their lots to create additional lots. The proposed plat would subdivide four existing lots and result in 14 lots. Three lots on the north side of Lois Lane each would be divided into four lots. One lot on the south side of Lois Lane would be split into two lots. Existing homes would remain. To accommodate the development proposal, the following approvals are necessary: 1. Comprehensive plan amendment: change land use from Low Density Unsewered Residential to Low Density Sewered Residential, and acquire 6.22 acres of MUSA reserve from the Metropolitan Council for the site. 2. Rezoning from existing Rural to R -1 Single Family Residential 3. Preliminary plat 4. Variance for lot depth: 132' instead of 135' ANALYSIS The following is a summary of the of the proposal: Gross Site Area Upland Area Total Lots Gross Density Net Density 6.22 acres (including existing right of way) 6.22 acres (MUSA need) 14 2.25 units /acre 2.25 units /acre • When Mar Don Acres was platted in 1978, the northern 30 feet was included in an easement. This 30 feet was intended to be the southern half of a right of way for a road. The other half would be supplied when the land to the north was developed. (This became the Bluebill Ponds site.) The goal was to allow a continuation of the existing 79th St. The minutes from the P & Z meeting of March 8, 1978, state that the P & Z recommended: ...that the Mar Don Plat be approved subject to the requirement that the fee owner shall, after the filing of the plat execute a deed dedication to the City of Lino Lakes, of an easement for street and public utility purposes, on the north 30 feet of lots one through eight, both inclusive, Block one of said plat and that no building permits shall be issued until such deed is delivered to the City and accepted by the Council. The intent shall be that such street shall not be opened or /and unless and until further development demands the opening and use thereof and until the property owner to the north dedicates a 30 foot similar easement immediately north of and contiguous to said easement. Following the first review of Bluebill Ponds by P & Z in October 1999, several residents of Mar Don Acres informed us that they wanted the road built along the south border of Bluebill Ponds. They wanted the option of subdividing their lots, which requires the road to provide access. Staff held a neighborhood meeting on November 9, 1999 to discuss this issue. Residents along the alignment of the desired road were invited, including those in Mar Don Acres, Sherwood Green, and unplatted properties to the north (west of Bluebill Ponds). Based on this meeting and follow -up calls to residents who were not at the meeting, staff found that six of eight property owners in Mar Don Acres wanted the road. Residents in Sherwood Green and lots to the west of BlueBill Ponds did not want the road. Staff directed the developer to include a road on the plat. This is now Arlo Lane. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site residential Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural North residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 South residential Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural East park and residential Low Density Unsewered and Sewered Residential R -1 and Rural West residential Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural • • The City's comprehensive plan guides the Mar Don Acres neighborhood for Low Density Unsewered Residential. The plan addresses such neighborhoods directly: The rural areas also include unsewered low density residential and use areas on lot sizes of less than five acres in size. As illustrated on the Proposed Land Use Plan, the unsewered residential developments are scattered throughout the City. These unsewered residential subdivisions were created prior to 1990 when the City increased its rural lot size to 10 acres. Property owners within the unsewered residential subdivisions have expressed concerns related to nearby urban growth and the extension of utilities to their subdivision. The encroachment of urban growth has presented concerns for land use compatibility and traffic. Property owners are also concerned with cost of special assessments related to larger lots if utilities are extended within the subdivision. In response to these existing land use issues, the Proposed Land Use Plan recognizes the existing unsewered residential subdivisions as long term land use within the City. These properties will continue to exist in this present condition unless the property owners wish to pursue municipal utilities and resubdivision of the larger lots. • To preserve the character of these unsewered residential subdivisions, the following strategies will be pursued: • 1. The existing unsewered residential subdivisions will remain outside the City's MUSA and not be eligible for municipal utilities. 2. MUSA would be available to an unsewered residential subdivision only if the Comprehensive Plan amendment and a utility improvement is petitioned for by the majority of the property owners that may benefit from the utility improvement and approved by the City. City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan, pages 82 -83 Growth Management, MUSA Reserve: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy establish a specific number of MUSA acres for residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The MUSA reserve was calculated based on a specified amount of growth in specified areas. The total did not include growth resulting from converting existing low density unsewered residential areas to sewered areas. And, as noted above, the comprehensive plan clearly states that MUSA would be available to an unsewered residential subdivision only if the comprehensive plan is amended. The City is not using existing MUSA reserve to accommodate the Elm Street project. We are processing a comp plan amendment that includes a new MUSA request for that neighborhood. • Therefore, staff is recommending that the comp plan amendment for Haley Manor include a request both for a land use category change (unsewered to sewered) and for an additional 6.2 acres of MUSA. Growth Management, Units/Year: The table below show the status of the staging plans for final platting new residential units. The ten new units would fit within the policy of 147 per year and so could be platted in 2003 — provided MUSA is made available for the project. The project also would fit in the 2004 lot allowance. LOTS /UNITS Development Name and Phases Prelim Plat Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Stoneybrook 2nd Addn 103 51 52 Century Farm North 249 56 65 52 43 33 Ravens Hollow 56 56 Haley Manor 10 new 10 total 51 118 121 52 43 33 01 remainder of 147 29 26 95 104 114 147 Once the City approves the application, it must submit the comprehensive plan amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review. Any City approval of the application will be contingent upon Met Council approval of the plan amendment. This will add time to the process. Rezoning The site currently is zone Rural. In order for the urban -sized lots to be created, the site must be rezoned to an urban residential zone. As stated in the zoning ordinance: The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The application includes an amendment of the comprehensive plan to change the land use and the MUSA line to accommodate the project. If this amendment is approved, the project would comply with the comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Bluebill Ponds to the north and Highland Meadows West to the east both are zoned R -1. The R -1 zone allows lots of 10,800 sf, which would accommodate the Haley Manor lots, and would be consistent with adjacent urbanized development. The rest • • • of the Mar Don Acres neighborhood will remain as larger lots. Lot size alone does not create an automatically incompatible situation. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (in the ordinance). The new lots will conform to the R -1 standards in the zoning ordinance. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Sanitary sewer and water are available in Lois Lane at the west edge of the Highland Meadows West development, adjacent to the Haley Manor site. Connecting 14 single family homes will not overburden these systems. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The addition of 10 single family homes will not overburden the roadway system. Lois Lane has outlets to the east and west and Country Land connects to 77th St. to the south. Preliminary Plat/Development Stage Plan Lots: The lots on the north side of Lois Lane will be 132 feet in depth. The minimum lot depth in an R -1 zone is 135 feet. When the Mar Don Acres lots were platted, they were 294' deep. The 30' easement on the north edge, which now includes Arlo Lane, reduces the depth to 264'. Half of that is 132'. It is impossible to know why the extra six feet was not planned for when Mar Don Acres was platted. However, it is clear that the intent was to plan for a road on the north side, and a 30' easement was platted. The construction of Arlo Lane fulfilled that plan for a street. The City approval of the creation of Arlo Lane was an acknowledgement of the intent to provide the opportunity for the Mar Don Acres lot to subdivide. In order to fulfill this, the lots must be smaller than 135' in depth. The locations of Arlo and Lois Lanes prevent larger lots. It may be possible to add three feet onto one row of lots and make the other row 129', though the value of such a change is questionable. The reduced lot depths are acceptable. A second issue arises due to the locations of existing streets. Joseph Court forms a "T" intersection on the north, and Country Lane does so on the south. The driveways on Lots 2, 3, and 9 should be located as far as possible from these intersecting streets. This is included as a condition of approval. Streets: Arlo Lane, Lois Lane and Country Lane all are existing roads. No additional roads are being proposed. The existing road system can accommodate the traffic generated by the 10 new homes. • • • As part of the final plat, the developer must dedicate the Arlo Lane right of way. This will fulfill the intent of the City when Mar Don Acres was platted. Arlo Lane exists now, and the dedication will be a formality. Utility work in Lois Lane will disturb the existing pavement. This road must be reconstructed, with curb and gutter, up to City standards. Park Dedication: The current subdivision ordinance includes park dedication requirements, as adopted in 2001. Park dedication is $1665 per residential unit, less any land dedication. There is no land dedication needed, as Highland Meadows Park abuts the site. The park dedication will be $1665 x 10 new home lots = $16,650. Utilities: Sanitary sewer and water are available in Lois Lane at the west edge of the Highland Meadows West development, adjacent to the Haley Manor site. All lots, including existing homes, must connect to utilities. Onsite septic systems must be abandoned according to law. In addition, existing wells likely will have to be capped because of proximity to new sanitary sewer lines. These and other issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. Grading and Stormwater Management: The grading plan proposes a pond to be created within the rear yards of the western eight lots north of Lois Lane. The outlet of this pond will be between Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, to the existing stormwater sewer facilities in Arlo Lane. The grading and drainage related modifications and comments, as recommended by the City Engineer in the attached memorandum must be addressed to the City Engineer's satisfaction. The plan is also subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed the project at its June 25 meeting. The following is an exerpt from the Environmental Specialist memo that covers several projects: Topic: Frank Feela Inc., Hailey Manor Recommendations: The Environmental Board made the following comments and recommendations concerning Hailey Manor: • Look at a more creative design, such as duplexes or other structures, to create more open space on the North side. • Identify an access area for the proposed infiltration pond. • Identify a control (signage and legal) for the preservation of native materials in the infiltration area. • Work with the City Natural Resource Specialist to try to save more hardwood trees. • Recommend not setting precedence on a rezone request where there is no defined MUSA allocation. (Strong concern about this issue.) • • • • Follow Staff (Environmental Specialist) recommendations: Infiltration areas proposed on site should have the City native seed specification used. Native seed should be applied at the same time as erosion control vegetation seed is applied. There should be no importing or exporting of soil form the site with out City approval. All BMPS for erosion control and compaction control should be followed. Soils should be restored to pre - grading compaction densities. A boulevard tree should be provided for each lot frontage. The tree inventory should indicate genus and species with size. Several recommendations have been included in the conditions of approval, below. Notes on the grading plan include the infiltration basin to 6" prior to seeding, which addresses the compaction issue. Access to the pond is identified on the grading plan. A drainage and utility easement will be required over the pond — signage can be discussed with the developer. The MUSA/rezoning issue is addressed by the comprehensive plan amendment request. The project requires additional MUSA along with the change to the land use. The application requires the approval of both the City and the Met Council. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Approval of the project should include the following conditions: 1. The City's approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat and variance is contingent upon Metropolitan Council approval of the comprehensive plan amendment. The final plat shall not be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board or City Council prior to said Metropolitan Council approval. 2. All lots in the plat, including the existing homes, must agree to connect to City utilities. The City will not approve the final plat without legally enforceable assurance that all properties will connect and existing onsite septic systems will be abandoned. 3. Existing wells shall be capped when required by Minnesota Dept. of Health requirements. 4. As a result of the utility main construction, the developer shall restore Lois Lane by complete reconstruction with concrete curb and gutter and new bituminous surfacing. 5. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo of July 1, 2003 must be addressed to his satisfaction. 6. All landowners shall sign development agreement and final plat or an agreement to plat. The City Attorney must review relevant documentation. 7. The north 30 feet shall be dedicated to the City on the final plat for right of way for Arlo Lane. • • • 8. To minimize conflicts with existing street intersections, the driveway on Lot 2, Block 1 shall be as far east as possible; the driveway on Lot 3, Block 1 shall be as far west as possible; and the driveway on Lot 9, Block 1 shall be as far east as possible. 9. Park dedication of $16,650 shall be paid. 10. A permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District must be issued prior to final plat approval by the City. 11. Infiltration areas proposed on site should have the City native seed specification used (rather than MnDOT mix specified in grading notes). 12. A boulevard tree shall be provided for each lot frontage. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the applications as follows: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment: - Change Land Use From Low Density Unsewered to Low Density Sewered Residential, and - Obtain Additional MUSA Reserve and Allocate MUSA • Rezone From Rural to R -1 • Preliminary Plat • Variance for Lot Depth. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 This review is based on the following plans and information: City Engineer Comments dated July 21 2003 Environmental Board Comments, June 25, 2003 Boundary/Topographic Survey, June 9, 2003 Preliminary Plat, June 9, 2003 Preliminary Utility Plan, June 9, 2003 Preliminary Grading and Erosion Plan, June 24, 2003 (recd. June 25) /4 -M-A -N E- -6B 7 M 5 • a 8 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL /6 - -►Ill- �! �-- RisN -F 1 OF -WOW D. .2, or_ col . . r N NM8Efl -2-5 - —4 - .— w00 CARL. 14 13 • 141 EE 12 11 10 4 8 PARK t8 7 6 5 4 3 2 NORTH OUTLOT v F 16 � 16 z _ _ /I/ 10 HERWO•O L2& 4 6,BO LAX 0 L L( 3 " -IL -: ;ice �i' ' iy P_ et ,�o - - - -- 1 z34 43 AIM" A 69ARB, LANE N • . 01164,44 Q' 1 ? 9 CO 4* Al I MAN *ft % 4. 41* Allir Mira .•'P= . o ' Amr 425 "1 11 ® 4'z XO 1EI T J0K L 1 AMMO 7TH S **®E P s L Opp 12 RE NW000 LA 7 8 9 10 Lq —STRE ET— 0 LAKES MERCIA L .0 LINO LAKES 8 / 9 OIL. A —PARK ; r/ // ouTLOr A • • woo pekrwri„ �) J I 1104 AltbAtiPA • • !kr* 444vjed Adur **tiv% Sint ri , jer 71 t6 Z4'4'M4i 40) rti" R -1 c v ■ e����l1l1 LINO AIR PARK NORTH TKDA NGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM • 1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Hailey Manor City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Copies To: From: Scott A. Brink Date: July 1, 2003 Comm. No. 12701 -002 Routing: The proposed plans provide for a preliminary ad Country Essen Tally, the proposed project cons is of the located at the intersection of Lois Lane rY following: 1. The dividing of a single 1.02 acre parcel into two lots at the southwest corner of the intersection of Lois Lane and Country Lane. One existing home is proposed to remain. 2. The dividing of three existing parcels into 12 lots on 3.35 acres of property located between Lois Lane and Arlo Lane. Three existing homes are proposed to remain. The following documents were reviewed: Plan sets dated June 9, 2003, by Metro Land Surveying and Engineering HydroCAD Model dated June 3, 2003 The following comments are provided at this time: General Comments 1. Some of the Plan Sheets read "for Frank Fella" and others read "for Hai ley Manor." oon tThe he e plansal title or name for the proposed development should be clarified and labeled consistently 2. Some Plan Sheets read "Hailey Manor" but the legal description says "Haley Manor." Again, the title should be verified and labeled consistently. Drainage and Stormwater Comments 1. If this is truly a landlocked design, then the 10 -day snowmelt computation (Curve Number is 100 and runoff of 7.2 inches) needs to be used to determine the High Water Level of the pond. • 2. The proposed 12" RC pipe emergency overflow outlet will need to be a 15" RC pipe (minimum size). An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Hailey Manor Page 2 July 1, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 3. Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1 of Mar Don Acres traditionally have drained to the landlocked low area in Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 1. The proposed drainage computations do not appear to take into account Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 1 developing. 4. City rate control requirements are not being met on the 2, 10, and 100 -year storms. 5. Approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District will be required. 6. The proposed drainage and utility easement shown on the utility plan and preliminary plat shall be expanded to cover the entire detention area in the center of the property. Standard lot perimeter easements shall be provided as shown on the preliminary plat. 7. The overflow for the detention basin connects with a City storm sewer catch basin located in Arlo Lane. This system eventually discharges to a 15 -inch diameter pipe at a grade of 0.3 %. It is recommended that the capacity of this pipe to adequately accommodate the added pond overflow in addition to its existing flows be evaluated further. General Street and General Utility Comments 1. Arlo Lane was constructed recently with concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, and utilities • (sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and watermain). The Preliminary Utility Plan shows sanitary sewer and water services extending to lots 1 -6, but does not identify the services as existing or proposed. The services must be labeled accordingly. The developer shall be responsible for any and all repairs to Arlo Lane that may be caused as a result of said development, including new concrete curb and gutter, aggregate and bituminous base, and bituminous surfacing as may be needed. 2. Lois Lane currently exists as an older bituminous street with no curb and gutter (bituminous curbing), and no existing utilities. The extension of sanitary sewer and water from their existing termination points on Lois Lane at the east limit of the site is proposed. Sanitary sewer and water services should therefore be extended to each lot (Lots 7 -12) from the newly constructed mains. Extension of sanitary sewer and water services to the two proposed lots (Lots 1 and 2, Block 2) at the southwest corner of Country Lane and Lois Lane should also be provided and shown. 3. The proposed watermain connection point on Lois Lane currently exists as a dead end main, and will be extended even further in length as a dead end. We are evaluating the system at this location to verify that existing pressures and flow rates at this location are adequate. 4. As a result of the utility main construction, the developer shall restore Lois Lane by complete reconstruction with concrete curb and gutter and new bituminous surfacing (i.e., the street shall be reconstructed to City of Lino Lakes standards). Said reconstruction shall be identified and provided on the plans. • Concrete curb and gutter shall be identified as D412. Hailey Manor Page 3 July 1, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 6. It is recommended that soil borings and a geotechnical report be provided. The subgrade must be accepted by the City Engineer prior to placement of Class 5 aggregate base. In the event the subgrade is determined to be unsuitable by the City Engineer, the subgrade shall be cut, removed, and replaced with select granular material. The depth of the subgrade cut shall be determined by a geotechnical engineer and approved by the City. 7. Currently, storm sewer is provided on Arlo Lane and none provided on Lois Lane. Storm sewer shall be furnished and installed on Lois Lane, as needed, as part of the reconstruction of Lois Lane. It is recommended that the existing drainage conditions at the Lois Lane /Country Lane intersection area be evaluated further to determine if at least some storm sewer or drainage improvements should be constructed as part of this project. Additional Utility Comments 1. Sanitary sewer service pipe shall be SDR 26 or SCH 40 and ductile iron water pipe shall be CL 52. Gate Valves shall be Mueller A- 2370 -20 with mechanical joints, meeting AWWA Specifications C500 -61. Valve Boxes shall be Mueller H -10357 with H -10361 drop lid and extensions shall be Mueller H- 10363. All sanitary sewer and storm sewer manholes and appurtenances shall be furnished and provided as required by the City of Lino Lakes. A separate detail sheet showing all applicable standard plates of the City of Lino Lakes shall be provided. • 2. Sanitary sewer and watermain system materials and installation methods shall follow the City of Lino Lakes engineering standards. A utility plan with notes referring to City of Lino Lakes and CEAM details and other pertinent construction notes must be provided. 3. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed MPCA Sanitary Sewer Permit, including correspondence and approval of Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed MDH permit for watermain installation. • 4. Utility installations shall be installed in accordance with the recommendations of a geotechnical analysis and report. 5. It appears that this development proposes to construct new single family homes with City utilities while retaining some existing homes that are currently served by well and septic systems. It is expected that any existing homes to remain as part of this project will be connected to City sewer and water, and shall have existing septic and wells removed and capped accordingly per MPCA and MDH standards. The developer shall be responsible for addressing these issues as may be required with the appropriate regulatory agency. The developer shall also be aware that the Minnesota Department of Health has very specific rules regarding the minimum distance that a sanitary sewer may be placed from and existing well (50 feet for sewer mains and 20 feet for services). The developer shall address these issues with the State accordingly prior to approval of the plans and commencement of any construction activity. 6. Profile sheets must be provided for sewer and watermain installation on Lois Lane. Hailey Manor Page 4 July 1, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Other Comments 1. The Contractor shall adhere to working hours for construction activities in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes. 2. A note must be added to the grading plan stating that Contractor shall provide a sweeper to clean streets and paved areas outside of the project site on a daily basis as needed. 3. A note must be added that the City of Lino Lakes Utility Superintendent shall be contacted at least 48 hours prior to any utility work, utility connections, or any work in the public right -of -way being performed. 4. At least some of the existing homes proposed to remain as part of the project do not appear to meet side setback requirements with the new lot configurations. • • BOUND RY/ OPO R PHIL SUR \BEY A • .93'4.34 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 13 21 tl n �9 02 • J / / % 0 W'TER SERVICE (TYP) / l / f1 1 1� 1 ` I• I I .1 Itw O O • ply e„ — 907 — — — — f 'RANx ,'2TL2- TNH ELEV =914.17 I J 589.27124 "E L • 11 Os ` I ; 1-- - EXISTING% HOUSE 1////// ,.aer \ I / / / e TREE LINE (TYP.) / - -- 908 ---1 _ —909-\ \ /� s.o1• �!! / /! /! / /�/!!!/ I / / EXISTING HOUSE j / / 89 °26'45 'E 240.00 EDGE OF TREES 908 SON .69 x �\ FENCE (TYP.) ■ / EXISTING HOUSE j 1 09' 4 "5.90 N89",r7'24 "l( m 1W r l LOIY\ LANE 11 \ / EXISTING HOUSE 1 GV INV.- 899.89 TOP RIM e• 911.515 S TH53 I / / /// w SEPTIC° / N y I -,w / /= U / / EXISTING H USE I / 1 / EXISTING BIT DRIVE BASKETBALL HOOP -, /EXISTING /,I -iOUSE EXISTING BIT rRl BASKETBALL H LEGEND • – DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND Q IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED WITH LICENSE NO. 23968. 11 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER MANHOLE e< CATCH BASIN - SIGN ® = DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL j - LICHT - HYDRANT DENOTES GATE VALVE ® s DENOTES POWER POLE - DENOTES BUMPER POST —589— < DENOTES SANITARY SEWER UNE —rn— - DENOTES STORM SEWER LINE —oE— DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES PINE TREE DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE LEGEND • Denotes iron monument found o Denotes iron monument set Elevations are NGVD Datum LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 6, 7, AND 8, BLOCK 1. MAR DON ACRES, AND LOT 1, BLOCK 3, HALEY MANOR, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report won prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the lows of the state of Minnesota. Dated this day of 2003 By. Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 13293 DRANK Br JUG CHECK 801 RPA N0. DATE .10B 90: 855.004 011C NQ 955004TOP0 DESCRIPTION EDGE OF TREES ( 51 r 7 ) 1 loch - 30 ft- S89 °27' 240. DATE 2/29/0.1 SHEET: 1 •11 BY IAND SURVEYING ,1412 East County Rood D. little Grads. 101 55117 Telephone:. (651)766 -0112 For (851)786 -0612 E –melt eurse•metrols.eom 1 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE PR LIMIN RYPLAT r . I I • I 1 r.. r♦ . l 1 " 11 ' I r- I i I'I I I /L. - I.l I L- 1.- I I Y L/ I I I 1 L ARLO LANE S89 °27'24 "E re HIH IL E 1 1:14 I SE.8 T.331. -W i I W ��E u'°° O C L - N , 0-,- 495.98 MO (DI FEET ) 1 Snob - 40 11. LEGEND o . gg,: =.e omosl000g Elevations are NGVD Datum 0 OR • J n o v3? e4 1 0 HOUSE 0 82.50 495.90 110 6 10.08290 SgFU 5 Acres± n 82.50 10 7 (- 10890 9gFtlkf, 0,251 %Alms± 82.50 J 101 1 10 E- 82.50 5 10890 Sgit± 0.25 Acres± 15 5f-0 In I 4 82.50 _o 10890 SgEtt g 0.25 Acres± 82.50 f osA I 0090 SgFlt - - -� 1 10.25 Acres± • DOSING HOUSE L TYPICAL EASEMENTS: TYPICAL DRAINAGE & UTIUTY EASE)AENT STREET 10.00 1 5.00 5.00 1 10.00 5.00 I 5.00 } REAR UNE f BEING TO FEET IN YADTH ADJOINING llxttf I NES AND REAR LOT U4ES• AND 5 FEET ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. J 82.50 82.50 S89 °27'24 "E N : ,,500 82.50 11IIIj 9 I 10890 SgFtt IL-14 0.25 Acres± 10 1 L J 0 1' 1 1 1 1 BLOCK 82.50 82.50 -i 3 10890 SqFt± 0.25 Acres± N: N I- 4 1 10890 SqFt± I 5 , 0.25 M.res± L. _J 82.50 495 90 COSTING HOUSE 82.50 7- -SETBACK UNE 1 (TYP.) 1 1 g 2 10890 SqFt± 0.25 Acres± 1; 82.50 83.40 0 r -15 1 r 8 T' 11 1 11009 SqFt± 0.25 Acres± n 10890 SgFtt 0.25 Acres* J 82.50 COSTING HOUSE 83.40 rr. 0 0 8 0 S89 °26'45 "E 240.00 NORTN LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 50 `1A 1IA' 5„ 4- Al r 1I Wen ENE • ¢ �IyMM tl' SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. DOSING / CO HOUSE ,.. tr1 5E 85.00 15728 SgFtt 0.36 Acres± 8 3 T 12 L 155.00 , 28677 SgFt* 0.66 Acres± 2 [4-41 r' • 0 Imo . r- , -155.03 0 '110 00 j10 S89 °27 24 "E 240.03 COUNTRY LA LOWS LANE 0 0 r • NOTES: R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY' TOTAL ACREAGE - 235,534 sq.ft. (Excluding R /W) - 5.41 acres TOTAL NUMBER LOTS - 16 NET DENSITY MINIMUM LOT SIZE MAXIMUM LOT SIZE AVERAGE LOT SIZE FXISTING ZONING RURAL - 2.96 UNITS /ACRE - 10,800 sq.ft. - 0.25 acres = 43,004 sq.ft. - 0.99 acres = 14,721 sq.ft. = 0.34 acres R -1 HOLLY SETBACK INFORMATION FRONT AND CORNER LOTS: 35 FEET FRONT ON COLLECTOR STREET (LOIS LANE): 40 FEET REAR YARD: JO FEET 510E YARD: 10 FEET MINIMUM LOT 81DTH AT SETBACK UNE. 80 FEET LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 6, 7, AND 8, 'BLOCK 1, MAR DON ACRES, AND LOT 1, BLOCK 3, HALEY MANOR, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. RECEIVED JUN 11 2.003 GM OF LINO LAKES I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT T1i15 SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATED THIS DAY OF 2003 8Y: SURVEYOR, MINNESOTA UCENSE N0. 13293 DRAW) 811 0. I JOB 60 314005 CHECK DK .B DWG NO 314005PP DATE 5/9/D3 SWEET: I of 1 A 8/5/03 OMITTED BLOCK 3 N0. DATE DESORPTION BY OWNER /DEVELOPER FRANK FELLA 11423 NATIONAL COURT NE. BLAINE, MINNESOTA 55449 (763) 754 -5400 ENGINEERING BY: METRO LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 12510 FLETCHER LANE NORTH UNIT 8 ROGERS, MINNESOTA 55374 -9687 (763) 428 -5130 CONTACT: ED JOHNSON SURVEYING BY: METRO LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 12510 FLETCHER LANE NORTH UNIT B ROGERS, MINNESOTA 55374 -9687 (763) 428 -5130 CONTACT: FRANK KRIZ ink (_ sE VI ♦gam "'ll►llaiElEa®i®fE1//9 /[-- IAND SUKVEYING A 5 412 East County Rood /i UW, 55117 Telephone•. (851)786 -0112 Par (851)786 -0812 R- meth sur.e7Ometrols. com 5 • PREL1M1N ,`r III( GRADING \0 FRAN-x ITELA - AND EROSION CONTROL X.90921\ L00303 -1,<S99 96 /0014 / -Ar., /010.27 /0(116 YOVV.S2 X341.16 X.100 /90927 X>ol Lot X050..0 X'90-7.1B X NO.S6 \ 7 Xto.t4t-, / on Cu, 005 X905 39 X9CO.76 /015 75 x431502 / -- X909." /93920 >, too 6, 7 X Kai' / X91•8208 x oe T N H L E 1 7 t E ia, a o - NV=902 . 2 9 - 5 ' E TRH 34 ..7 _ E v e914 17 / 1 9 4 OM 904 . .I 8 3 N ti 4Pr 9S 5 90 0 C/)4 C.) 1 1 c...) ' L SCE 15E 34 7040 SAN. MN EMERGENCY 01.14453.0* T4e 0)R8.908 5 WII■MMENI .T,3;17 • - 22M171r,..rm= 7?'11114•••• 914 ,N els 1 30 01599 SAN 3 Xtr".5.100.0305 ASK., r -V v)9 , u 1-54 490115 '090344 004 9)/ . k3.5 F 917 916 E uurrarrAna.N.r. -7•• vai-'-,■awaaaue.acier.w76 • -.I ile 1188 - 9093 X9 r X915_94._ 096962 IXNa 46 X909 24 X910p \ X59910 DRAINAGE ARROWS EXISTING ELEVATIONS PROPOSED ELEVATION LOT DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) 1 PAD ELEVATION AT REAR OF HOUSE HOUSE TYPE • MINIMUM ELEVATION OF BOTTOM FLOOR PROPOSED TOP OF CURB GRAD GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION NOTE- IF HOUSE TYPES ARE CHANGED FROM PROPOSED, BOTTOM FLOOR ELEVATION MUST BE 906.0, MINIMUM. THE LOWEST OPENING ELEVATION MUST BE 909.5 MINIMUM. NORTH . GRAPHIC SCALE SO 40 140 ( IN FEET 1 Inch u 40 ft. hereby certify that this survey. pion or report was prepared I by me or under my direct supervision and that I om a duly licensed land surveyor under the lows Of the state of Minnesota. Doted this 24TH day of JUNE 2003 By: Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 13293 t- . 0 Xow W, / EXIS11NG HOUSE 910.1 BF N X9092MATCH EXISTING - 7 PAvuENT AND BT CURB m ■ m m i - PROP. SAN MR PROP. CONC. 8 .00 x 53 \ ffi 9 F009 24 \ x9.16 \ ELI ,09ea 1212 *'\6 , 2 9.56) _ -- FEONC,'C'WCO-GS2°Q--- ------ ......_____.--....:.I.. ........""k\ \ --., • 6 . - AC * ZI7JIMIP4P11-.. II MFAPI ST98IN19E19F5I.3 • k_ - -M. N 0.00 \ N 0 IZ. 8 .V \ \., 910 90* 9 1 2.0tNott RI a „906.0 BF 912.0 910 0.^4 614909 331 908.45 BLOCK 2 1 32 907.21 82.0o 3140 0 .. 1 2 x0 o 1.1 6 06 T1. PR a 0. -7 54 7 24 50408 x 0 0 2 909 2 1 EXISTIN BIT DRI > SF ta ) I ) / (ewes: 09tf,e; Nci;e1 x908.27 EDGE Of 60005 CRETE 0 H0084 4 xtta EDGE or TREES TL 004 3304 1 RN l0943 RED 20:7811001 X 90812 %908 1 20 x911. 23 k°14: t-31 k I 1.7.1 Pen n. I 50003 - ; 3 0500 e4 3164 0369 7-84 1E . 99 x 1 sae 3 t2 8 _ 9 .v . 3 7 I 1 1 ' 4 CHAIN 11440 FENCE es/n4 k N 7 9 0 1 ‘ 1 1 I .- - 4_ e r- t - X I . 0 L4 - f t 8 - . .P\ 2 .0. . . .\ \- N.1i\ s1A , ' . .\ ,. '\ s , R1 ..1. 9\ T=A, S 9- 0 7R L .M.. . Z\ 01 r 1 A N/ / / I 1 1 ( 7 \ I 1 942 viva 21 ..E.X4 TING 14011SE N1.33 71. Fora SHEDS 3S30 3529 10 11 85.• 21. • 009i: e -4E -/- • 39ts- REO 53NES537 538 5 .21 l\-EOCE OF 00005 0949140 ir-utk,a PN 050907 I L_ s P1E 10 2 / Jr' ,1.61.04 or% .1 LuATCHUNE A t r z I-11i I 1 1 11 1 4410.21i CONSTRUCT b CAP I cu" PROPOSED INFILTRATION !BED. 55.010. 1 rotLINNUTE913tCli.D Stud. 1 NEXT TO FASTING CB) 905 83 INSET A as5,10 INV■902 23 , 840.902.56 x 43 T N \ \ \ GENERAL NOTES • CoNTACT STATE dC CAW FOR LOCATIONS OF BuRED UNUTIES CALL MO 434-0002 OR taco 252-1168 •41011 TO KV. dada INSTALL SILT FENCE 0 LOCATIONS snow la 45 OREG. FR THE INCANCFR ADDHIONAL LOCAL cooalos 440 440 14E SIATT AKReAa nd m SA W IDE liCOVNE0 NKRE AREA Rd. ORM. SHALL PR02.21/ ON m MCA By MCA BAPS TO RANK( LINCOMPLETED AREAS (SCE METRATION BASM NOTES) *5 (*044 244* 161444* 8334 545008 9 051254. *55401 :T5Z4413 HOuRS OF GM GRAD. I WINCM 240 54050 41.1141305 ONOL.INO 344001 OF ACCommATED • (4814 KW... 5453444310* 113 3E0 1114 MALL BE 04001 WHOM sce-tow NANTENCE 694 )14045f14043. [KEPT INFILTRATMI dd ▪ KENO. FEROUSCR 10 44 014001 22-3-10. MN (43ad/ACK). ,470.04 %AZ TT:,,C.11"12 TOT/K3) TO BE STRAMIT 030 ANORRED. 7 0 o INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES ORM. 30003E - RON. GRAD. Mull. 3 NNE N 0001104000“ 113 44444470, OF THE 57E MAMIE TO Sand 03.1 OF FINISHED MAN. 1.10.1t OR RoBBER41030 ECAMNENT GRADING Or BA. 9431. DELAYED UNTS. WINKER OF STIT 15 ntest GRADED wo SEEIND RO OVER-EXCAVANd Or Lud NICAL 3 KLONED. Ar. Feed CR.. 105 44SO4 FLOOR 10 A 10144404 DEPT. OF 4 PICKS mut ma04 ma ov-strt 04401 sots • /moo 10 sopa at AS ORM. TNE ENOMER 33044400 NAT BE OMEN KROSS 113 BASH ROOR GRADING ANO 1004 ESTABLaNKNT OPERANT. ME 401413414. EROSION CONT.. - PLACE SAE rbet miouto 4*904 ARCA AT 014 m3DIATELT AFTER Rau. ORAO. 0/4430. RAMAN moll MISR GRAD. A. TIM ESTA6u6mENT NORA 35 003 AM vEOETATION ESTABLISKO dd. 1420? ES1ABLISMENT - SEED NTH oN/DOT ZED MAME 4250 AT 200 rrittoTN:"L‘Affers"Vaoniun,n414.5..!"' "'" "*"1 INFILVAIION DEO BOULEPARD. 500. SOUTH OF LOIS LANE ALTERNATE TREATNENE, 00NETCR Sod iumoLE INTH suL0 LEGEND 4.s44 sur alu. „fir -•••■■•-: 4••11,17•Mal 1.001•910■•• 421 IA( HOUSE STYLES R , • ee RAMBLER SEAKI ,a SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT 5E/10 SPLIT ENTRY LOOKOUT Elevations are NGVD Datum BENCINIARK. 7./4/1 NORINVEST QUAIL OF JOSEPH CT. AND ARLO LANE. ELEVATION gay \ PARC NESH REINFORCE 4 POST SPROI4G-SEE WON. ot ...■-•- d .13 ilLT I I I I . GENRE 4001E4854 TANK FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH TIA00112. YAM TAMPED NATURAL SOS. 65 YIN - OETNE 1111' ..t2. • . • 4 ../.........VOIRP1/41.• • , , 4.0.0 • :::::: 11,21.0.41:17:49:10 . ' t•ZA"liP1 1 I I I ..... .41■14. VZ7W0*::O.L:0, . ********************** ' VI:41! OW 111111 • r MN .07,411:41'';•:......./....1.! *** 5 1 SILT FENCES coosaucw0 NM SUPPORT FENCES. POSTS 614035 RE SPACED AT IT OF 4E53 AND WHEN AT LEAST X INTO 1144 010210 2 231 FENCES CONSTRUCTED 111114010 SUPPORT FDICES, POST 5149L 4* SPKED AT 4' OR LESS. AND DROJEN AT LEAST 1 310 THE GROUND 2 040 NASHED ROCK EROSION CONTROL DETAIL BERMED ROCK ENTRANCE ROAD PECEIVEn JUN 2 2003 CITY OF UN 0 LAKES LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 6, 7, and 8, Block 1, MAR DON ACRES, And olso Lot 1, Block 3, HAILEY MANOR, Anoka County, Minnesota. DRAWN Br Al0W 208 NO- 3I44005 0* 75. 5/8/8*3 CHECK et PIN 0653 NO: 34400514040 smEr of 5/3/03 OUITIEO BLOCK 3 6/14/03 ADDED INPLTRATION SWALE DATA 6/24/03 ADDED NOTES:REV NOOSE STYLES 0.41E DESCRIPTION Re LAND SURVEYING W, ENGINEERJNG • 412 East County Road D. Little Canada. NIN 55147 Telephone :(651)786-0112 Fax :(651)768-0612 E-maiL surveremetro)s.com 314.00 5CRAD PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLitIV ¢TNH ELEV•912.34 EX. 15* RCP STORM SEWER 0 0.30% C -L - 907.88 FRANx FE EC 4 • TNH ELEV•914.17 UGE ARLO UGE LANE J UGE L UGE UGE 1 EXISTING SAN. MH CONNECT TO 904.83 N EXISTING 8" WATERMAIN RIM •909.02 INV.•902.29 EXISTING SAN. MH EXISTING SAN. H 904.95 7:83 EXISTING 8-PVC SAN. 0 0.4X 13/I 13 Ml 0 EXISTING HOUSE 8 "PVC PLUG AND STUB SAN. INV. 903.9 UGG n RIM •914.60 INV.- 904.35 SAN. INV UGG UGG SAN. INV. UGG SAN. INV. UGG SAN. INV. UGG G WATER SERVICE (TYP) • 6 PONDING AREA 100 YR. HWI_ •905.7 1YR. HW1_- 904.2MENT eu 0 4.0 1905.0 905.3 904.7 rRF1.OW \5 4 DRAINAGE AND----- O 3 J 2 - 1 7 WYE =4 +40 MH 2 ofINV. 892.12 E 8 9 10 11 WYE =0 +80 12 o O // EXISTING HOUSE // / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / //� EXISTING HOUSE / / / / % a o cV / / EXISTING HOUSE / / /' / / / / / / / / / /// / cV - WYE =3 +50 WYE= 2 +50 MH 1 % INV. 891.34 E / INV. 891.34 W INV. 891.24E E / / / / / / / / / /i. r / / / /// WYE =O +15 CONNECT TO SANITARY} IN INV. 890.08 / / / //l WYE =1+.30 �, EXISTING HOUSE MATCH EXISTING 1 PAVEMENT AND BIT CURB T/ 8" PLUG E 195LF -8 "PVC SANITARY SEWER 0 0.407: 195LF -8 "DIP CL52 WATERMAIN I I PROP. CONC. C&G SIGN WYE =1 +90 PROP. HYDRANT 1QLF -6 "DIP CL52 WM 6 GATE VALVE 8 "x6" TEE BLOCK 2 1 I n11" 8 GATE VALVE r 26LF -8 "DIP CL52 WATERMAIN 18" GATE VALVE -_� 18" PLUG 1 A 1 1 r- • I- -I / t 1 1 1-- Y I 1 r -\ I L- L.- EO Z (n La z z ofta w(3 2 EXISTING BIT DRIVE TRY LANE MHO 290LF -8 "PVC SANITARY SEWER ® 0.40% 1 295LF -8 "DIP I I TE CL52 WATERMAIN PROP. HYDRANT 1QLF -6 "DIP CL52 WM 6 GATE VALVE 8 "x6" TEE WYE =1 +80 36LF -B "PVC SANITARY SEWER 0 0.40% INV. 891.48 A • 1 / \ r I \/1 /\ 1 \411`1 F( 1 4 -\ I WELL ® I EXISTING BIT DRIVE EXISTING HOUSE ___I 'T 1 CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN s. LEGAL DESCRIPTION • MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CONC. CAcC C / Lots 6, 7, and 8, Block 1, MAR DON Block 2, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Minnesota. X. HYD. IEXISTING HOUS EXISTING SAN. MH RIM •911.53 INV. •899.89 ._-b4 G.V EXIST. WM 8 BIT DRIVE NOTES 50411:1 bOIQ SM.AE 0C CALL' 1CR mamas 6 sumo 0O41m5 cal. (A5) 1464-0001 at 101C01 4ss -4455. Inc. ar,TNSr N moors WW1, • AS 114c110 O f T. 1710 pl1..10/. 541 r13. I. E AMA. •Ot IoCK O 0.101 040•1 OWL MO. w AN AKA AT 4*0 SASS 10 WIRE 1•¢05TLao MOOS IS [Ad Mr* 544554 M SIIIQT 5 0.A00. 4(330 4MTC 14454 N.. AM5 MAd A051011 5M A SW.w1T Z4 50C 551 N W. mc woos YA14TM AM IOM MT 10 S (*.5511* EW1A 54 AWA111A1fD an MITI. MOAT. a mA•mIm M iao 5[ •WL E I000T IaMSC SOFtp WARP. TWf- (lmss/AO•y C M®TA 4451440 TO E MOOT II -S-14 MA. (2*ass/A1.1 . Mom mum me I U 10n/AOE) T5 E 511.011 o•e AMO,am MCA/ STREET SECTION LIDG1:NN0 MOMM Maya • - warm. arm. • -- • Elevations are NGVD Datum eO40YARK• LN.H NORINMEST QUAD. Cr JOSEPH CT. ANO .49.0 LANE EIEYAIION - 914.47 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE AD Is AA AO (0 TEES ) 1 inch • 30 ft. I hereby certify that this survey, pion or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Dated this 9111 day of JUNE 2003 By. Engineer, Minnesota license No. 17659 CHAIN UNK FENCE DRAWN 85 WW CHECK Bl1 RIK Na DATE JOB NP. 314.005 DWG NO 314003CRA0 OESUOPTMN DATE 6/6/03 SNEER 1 of 1 BY ACRES, And also Lots 1 and 2, HAILEY MANOR, Anoka County, METRO LAND SURVEYING tII TMN55 • '412 East County Rued A UtUe Canada. 89 55117 1e0990074(651)780 -0112 For (651)768 -0512 E -mall: . ur.eyme trob. c om 314.005GRAD • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V. D. Michael Grochala July 9, 2003 Discount Tire Conditional Use Permit for Automobile Repair Facility Lake Drive & Apollo Drive, Lot 1, Block 1, Lino Lakes Marketplace In August of 2001 the City Council approved the Lino Lakes Market Place PDO (Ordinance No. 16 -01), which included the creation of three lots for single tenant use along Lake Drive. TCF Bank and Dairy Queen have previously received approvals for development on two of the lots. Discount Tire is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 6 bay tire repair facility on the remaining lot. This review is based on the most current submittal, consisting of the following plans: 1.) General location map. 2.) Land Title Survey dated 3 -13 -03 3.) Paving, Grading, and Erosion Control Plan (C2), dated 6 -7 -03. 4.) Site and Utility Plan (C3), dated 6 -7 -03. 5.) Landscape Plan (L1), dated 6 -7 -03. 6.) Building Elevations Plan (Al) dated 6 -7 -03 7.) Building Floor Plan dated 6 -7 -03 8.) Photometric Plan received 6- 24 -03. ANALYSIS Land Use & Zoning Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Mixed Use PDO West Commercial Neighborhood Business & General Business North Mixed Use GB East Mixed Use PDO South Mixed Use PDO" Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Discount Tire CUP The Market Place project was originally located within the SC, Shopping Center Zoning District. The SC District was eliminated with the revision of the recently adopted Zoning Ordinance. The requirements of the GB, General Business District are applicable to the site along with the Market Place Planned Development Overlay requirements In accordance with the provisions of the GB, General Business District automobile and truck repair facilities require a Conditional Use Permit.. Lot Area Requirements The 49,462 sq.ft. (1.14 acres) lot is consistent with the approved Lino Lakes Market Place PDO Site Plan. Setback Requirements Principle Building Parking Lot Required Proposed Required Proposed From Arterial Street 50 feet 60 feet 15 feet 15 feet From Local Street 30 feet 30 feet 15 feet 15 feet Side Yard 10 feet 72 feet 10 feet 10 feet Building Materials Building materials for the site are specified within the Market Place PDO, under "Design Guidelines" (Section 2.B), which delineate a number of materials, colors, finishes, and accents to be used for any building constructed within the Market Place complex, in order to achieve a uniform architectural aesthetic. The proposed building exterior materials consist of brick, with concrete masonry units (CMU) and E.I.F.S accents. The proposed building materials, colors, finishes and accents are in conformance with the PDO requirements. Building Height The maximum allowable building height is 45 feet. The proposed building has a maximum height of 27 feet. Landscaping In accordance with site and building plan submission requirements, a landscape plan has been provided for review. The plan includes overstory trees consisting of Swamp White Oak, Autumn Blaze Maple, Skyline Honeylocust, Black Hills Spruce and Colorado Green Spruce around the perimeter of the site. Shrubbery is included around the 2 Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Discount Tire CUP • perimeter of the site and at the building foundation. All turf and planting beds are • • proposed to be irrigated. As proposed, the tree quantities and species are consistent with the approved Market Place PDO Landscaping plan. However, staff would recommend that the proposed Colorado Green Spruce be replaced with the Black Hills Spruce. Additionally, Autumn Blaze Maples are proposed adjacent to the Dairy Queen Property, which also proposes Autumn Blaze Maples at the same location. The two properties should coordinate landscape activities accordingly. Green Area The maximum allowable impervious surface coverage is 75 %. The proposed impervious surface coverage is 73.3% and is in conformance with district requirements. Access /Circulation Access to the site from Lake Drive (C.S.AH. 23) is via either Apollo Drive or the secondary entrance at Market Place Drive. A private road connecting Apollo Drive and Market Place Drive borders the eastern side of the site, which provides access to the site. The proposed ingress and egress points are consistent with the approved Market Place PDO site plan. Parking Automobile Repair facilities require two spaces per service bay. Additionally the facility contains approximately 1,620 square feet of sales and display area which requires parking at a rate of 1 space per 200 square feet. A total of 20 parking spaces are required. Thirty - eight spaces are proposed on the site plan including two handicap spaces. Pedestrian Circulation Plans show sidewalks on the east side of the site, linking the site to the other businesses within the Market Place development. Sidewalks within the larger Market Place site link to a planned trail along Lake Drive. Lighting A photometric plan was submitted and is consistent with ordinance requirements. Three pole mounted lights with shoebox fixtures are proposed around the perimeter of the site and are in conformance with ordinance requirements. Four wall mounted lights are proposed along the east side of the building facing the interior of the Market Place development. The wall mounted lights will need to contain a cutoff which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of ninety (90) degrees. • • Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Discount Tire CUP Signage Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. In accordance with the Lino Lakes Market Place PDO, single tenant buildings are allowed one wall sign, which is limited in size to 100 sq.ft. or 20% of the building face, whichever is less. The Market Place PDO also provides for one monument sign on the site in accordance with the approved design standards. Trash Trash and used tire storage will be contained within the principal building. Utilities A utility plan has been submitted for review by the City Engineer. Water and Sanitary sewer service were provided to service the site as part of the Market Place development. As a condition of plan approval, the utility related modifications and comments, as set forth in the City Engineer's memo, should to be incorporated into the final plans. Stormwater Management A grading and drainage plan has been submitted for review by the City Engineer. As a condition of plan approval, the grading and drainage related modifications and comments as set forth in the City Engineer's memo should to be incorporated into the plans. The plan is not subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. Conditional Use Permit Section 7, Subdivision 3.H of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance lists automobile and truck repair as a conditional use. For the purposes of this permit the proposed use shall be classified as Automobile Repair - Minor defined in Section 1, Subdivision 2.B of the Zoning Ordinance as follows: "An establishment providing goods or services related to automobiles such as car washes, repair businesses limited to minor engineer repair, fluid changing, tire service and muffler repair and other uses of similar character, but not including uses defined as a major automobile business or automobile sales." The proposed use is subject to the following criteria: • Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Discount Tire CUP a. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence. Comment: The proposed architectural appearance and functional plan of the building is consistent with the Market Place PDO requirements. b. The entire area other than occupied by buildings or structures or planting shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete which will control dust and drainage. The entire area shall have a perimeter curb barrier, a storm water drainage system and is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Comment: The proposed use satisfies these requirements. c. All buildings shall provide an interior location for trash handling or an enclosed trash receptacle area in conformance with the following: 1) Exterior wall treatment shall be similar and/or complement the principal building. 2) The enclosed trash receptacle area shall be located in the rear or in a side yard which is not abutting a street. 3) The trash enclosure must be in an accessible location for pick up hauling vehicles. 4) The trash enclosure must be fully screened from view of adjacent properties. Comment: Trash will be contained within the interior of the building. c. All painting must be conducted in an approved paint booth. All paint booths and all other activities of the operation shall thoroughly control the emission of fumes, dust or other particulated matter so that the use shall be in compliance with the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota Regulation APC 1 -15, as amended. Comment: Not Applicable. No painting will be conducted on site. d. The emission of odor by a use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota regulations APC, as amended. Comment: To be included on Conditional Use Permit. • • Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Discount Tire CUP e. All flammable materials, including liquids and rags, shall conform with the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. Comment: To be included on Conditional Use Permit. f. All outside storage shall be prohibited except the storage of customer vehicles waiting for repair. g. Comment: To be included on Conditional Use Permit. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served by modifying the conditions. Comment: To be included on Conditional Use Permit. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on April 30, 2003 and recommended approval. Their comments are attached and have been incorporated into this report where applicable. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Site Plan is consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance and the Lino Lakes Market Place PDO. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Discount Tire Facility CUP, with the following conditions: 1. The Landscaping Plan be modified to replace the proposed Colorado Green Spruce trees with Black Hills Spruce. 2. The wall mounted lights contain a cutoff which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of ninety (90) degrees. 3. The modifications and comments as set forth in the City Engineer's memo, dated June 27, 2003, shall be incorporated into the plans. 4. The Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to uses classified as Automobile Repair — Minor defined as an establishment providing goods or services related to automobiles such as car washes, repair businesses limited to minor engineer repair, fluid changing, tire service and muffler repair and other uses of similar character, but not including uses defined as a major automobile business or automobile sales." • 5. The emission of odor by a use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota regulations APC, as amended. • Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Discount Tire CUP 6. All flammable materials, including liquids and rags, shall conform with the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. 7. All outside storage shall be prohibited except the storage of customer vehicles waiting for repair. 8. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served by modifying the conditions. 9. The applicant shall enter into a Site Performance Agreement with the City. ATTACHMENTS 1. General Location Map 2. City Engineer's Comments 3. Environmental Board Comments 4. Paving, Grading, and Erosion Control Plan (C2), dated 6 -7 -03. 5. Site and Utility Plan (C3), dated 6 -7 -03. 6. Landscape Plan (L1), dated 6 -7 -03. • 7. Building Elevations Plan (Al) dated 6 -7 -03 8. Building Floor Plan dated 6 -7 -03 9. Photometric Plan received 6- 24 -03. • • moOv ACM 9 I 9 e� ■ drs' ttf r A Am r icY 1 z 3 4 5 4 LC 3 I 3 4 3 OAK 11 Ia 11 I5 14 15 13 17 Is IS 7 a 10 11 '141 13 14 13 Ew 1s 17 11 1 IMO 33 34 33 3231 3029 34 as 27 •I■1111 all MINIMS umme Att PA9 • Memorandum DATE: June 27, 2003 TO: Mike Grochala FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Discount Tire Company Attached is a TKDA memorandum dated June 25, 2003, reviewing the Discount Tire Company plans located in the Lino Lakes Marketplace. These items must be addressed prior to approval being given for this project. Please contact me at 651/982 -2430, with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 0 Fax: 651 -982 -2499 TDD: 651 -982 -2410 TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Discount Tire 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Copies To: Lino Lakes Marketplace From: Scott A. Brink Date: June 25, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Comm. No. 12701 -002 Routing: I have included with this review a Review Memorandum for this development dated May 6, 2003, along with the following documents: Full Size and Reduced Size Plan Sets, Sheets Cl -05, Ll, Al, and A2, Westwood Professional Services, dated June 7, 2003. •The majority of items and issues mentioned in the previous memorandum have been addressed, however, please note the following: 1. The project site is located adjacent to the east side of Lake Drive (CSAH 23), just north of I -35W. The plans indicate that there will be very little or no work within the CSAH 23 right -of -way. However, if any type of temporary access or work activities occur within the right -of -way, review and approval of Anoka County will be required. Any work within the County right -of -way requires a permit from the County. The Developer shall be responsible for attaining said permit and adhering to any other conditions of the County as may be required. 2. The Contractor shall adhere to working hours for construction activities in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes. 3. Sanitary sewer service pipe shall be SDR 26 or SCH 40 and ductile iron water pipe shall be CL 52. Gate Valves shall be Mueller A- 2370 -20 with mechanical joints, meeting AWWA Specifications C500 -61. Valve Boxes shall be Mueller H -10357 with H -10361 drop lid and extensions shall be Mueller H- 10363. 4. Autumn Blaze Maples are proposed adjacent to the Dairy Queen property, which also proposes Autumn Blaze Maples at the same location. It is recommended that the two properties coordinate landscape and construction activities accordingly. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • Memorandum To: Michael Grochala CC: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: May 9, 2003 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations May 30, 2003 The following comment and recommendations were made at the April 30, 2003 Environmental Board Meeting: Discount Tire Company /633 Apollo Drive 1. If possible, reduce the pervious parking area stalls to the minimum standard of the new zoning code. This would reduce the total to 30 or 31 stalls. Suggest using a pervious type of parking if the number of parking stalls can not be reduced. 2. Use Ivy on the building as part of the site landscaping if the owner is open to this idea. Install some native flowerbeds in the landscape. 3. Change Sunburst honeylocust to straight thornless honeylocust. 4. Work with Environmental staff on landscape plan 5. Reduce illumination levels to, and use fixtures that conform to our new zoning code standards. 6. Verify where used tires will be recycled. 7. Follow Environmental Staff Report recommendations. 1 • 702003 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. t 'a« .<. k . %l:: r +i`t l.a. %A . /x.;, .1lip• 4: .,/.J: Y'.. '�:7^l• ?j /I't•} •S�t' i }i, .: t' "• 59.:• ;• ,•:.r1; .''i ;•4 ; r• X ' DMZ G • $R.T t ENCE:'(TY?:). -SEE'DETAII ; • RECEIVED JUN 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES 45t:A4:2.3- x•-'ta ti p':• ,w +9.....' .., .1 "-a . • toe. 'P- •• t•:t •912 =�! ' ,,•Z •..x...:. • '• ,r \ t.. . -!" -• •.' \I tw, \ • .e �3•L`N .,. ,. n.;d•, , rn 0 FIR ‹2 f < \ \ \ \ \ es ar A3% S,S + ,, °;1. :jS:xr• ; . •: . ;CONtTRHF�TIIN•/ ENTRANCE.' }_ _..... T - - -. :: (TXP. -SEr 0E,7141I,':"x ,ua LEG • DENOTES SOIL BORING :»atncm DENOTES SILT FENCE Ra DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE ?:it) •- DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER U—»- 1111 DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER 980 rvwv-, /-v-WY-v, 85566..3 E.O.F. DENOTES EXISTING TREE LINE DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE REMOVAL UMITS DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION i DENOTES AREA OF HEAVY -DUTY PAVEMENT 0' 20' 60' Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651- 454 -0002 Mn. Toll Free 1 -800- 252 -1166 SITE GRADING NOTES: A. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVING, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS. B. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS. DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND UGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. E. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR VILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK, THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE UNITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTO'S PERFORMANCE I5 NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. F. THE SITE WORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE DEVELOPER'S STANDARD SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. G. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE COSTS OF RETESTING (IN CASE OF TESTS NOT MEETING STANDARDS) SHALL BE BORN BY THE CONTRACTOR. H. ALL THE SLOPES ARE TO BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET. I. BUILDING GRADING HOLD DOWN IS 1.0 FOOT. SEE DETAIL SHEET FOR PAVING HOLD DOWNS. J. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC AND GRAVEL OVER ALL CATCH BASIN GRATE INLETS, AFFECTED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION AND AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, UNTIL ALL PARKING SURFACE IS PAVED. K. SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBIUTY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT UNITED TO STAKED STRAW BALES AND /OR SILTATION FABRIC FENCES. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBIUTY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY, AT HIS OPTION, DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR IN HIS METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND EFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABUSHED. L. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. M. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. N. SEE DETAIL SHEET FOR TYPICAL STREET AND PARKING AREA CROWNS AND SLOPES. 0. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOFROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOFROLUNG SHALL BE ACCOMPUSHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY- LOADED TANDEM -AXEL DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISIONS AND DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RECOMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. P. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS, WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS, AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. Q. AFTER THE SITE GRADING IS COMPLETED, IF EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES INVOLVED. R. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTINGS & TURF ESTABUSHMENT. S. AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF PONDS, ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL FENCES MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY OR ENGINEER AT TOP OF SLOPES OR HIGHWATER LEVEL 1 ly Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952/937.5150 Fax: 952/937 -5822 woo 4r * M f r4. 1- +brsv tmy Mro sasrreat odor Or Yaw of Or her. a Wm. Daniel SL Parks, PR o.e. 06/06/03 [3x.r x. 18919 s"'1'lor` P spared .,° msadn for Discount Tire Company, Inc. Dorm DYP DIG 20225 N Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85255 Discount Tire Lino Lakes, Minnesota Ewe 6/7/03 A -9 20031026.O0PVP.DWO !I Sheet Q oP C.5 Paving, Grading & Erosion Control Plan ;;'2003 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. p CBMH -3 RE =912.55 INV =907.65 (15 ") INV -907. 2 ") CONNECT TO EXISTING `\, MANHOLE. CONSTRUCT 12'.. INSIDE DROP. I.E =905.83 (UPPERi. I.E.=894.38 (LOWER) 4.F ;/'�i, eY% tl.:•� \Y .. .r, i!!�i!.t i h]e% •r): Wj,1t }�. n. 1 .1:7.• .1:; :•��'7rFf� h •r.:t: • t 717 ` 1Jti )!3 • . fry J.:r�1 • • :.OWE 1LilY • • Ivd --- enp- -'--�• --rat v° na - • 84.66 30.27'1 N25 °20Rif PLAN SHEET KEY; NOTES: • • .4L.4 64.28 - CE1-1 »' • •. RF, =912.60 INVV90a846O..' o R 0.5 R 97' -4 PVC SDR 35 0 2.00 %7 • B -3 122' -12" P 0 0.507"•p c, 4" SOJD WHITE JNES-PAIN (TYP.) • 3. (; CBMH -4 w° RE =912.43 W V =907.55 m' 55' -15` RCP LT..-...; 00.40% EX. CB -A REMOVE EXISTING GRATE & iFRAME; FURNISH & INSTALL MANHOLE; - TYPE COVER & FRAME - NEENAH- R -1733, OR APPROVED EQUAL ADJUST 1124 ELEV. FROM EXISTING 913.53 TO NEW 913.38. 24.00' 1 IM -TIFF PAINTED SYMBOLS!...,-SEE DE1 ILs _ Z 1 i 2.00' 0 -5 18.00' 3.67' e:S i s ly . ". Iw"6< "X4" PVC. WYE • R•5641.8.5 CLEANOUT I.E.= 907.77 INV 0 5' FROM .t(0- f,1GST1NG CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER TO PR0N0E FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. r? �2 REMO7E'EIOS1NG'CONCRETE WALK TO PROVIDE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. • Q: CONSTRUCT' CONCRETOWAU<'»413,_PED RAMPS - SEE DETAILS -. • p CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAI.EM IT •••; SEE OETAILS • •: :0 : CONSTRUCT BLWMINOUS. PAVE14ENT•,- •SEE'DETAILS • • GONSTUCT R'861.2 CONCRETE C URB - & CUTTER " - SEE DETMLS i91 . . nos : rria: , wt. .::....::..:..:.:..etr al•r• ... '. T .......::....:.....Qq'F QS.- ...- :.....a ...fW...• prey S�\Z • r: • C •\ * `• ., 0 \�r • • 4.10' 15' -4" PVC SDR 35 • Y: 02.00% I m •;k BUILDING= 908.07 n HANOICPPED PARKING SIGNS F.F.E. = 914.37 • )‘•., is INV 0 5' FROM BUILDING- 908.49 DECREASE CURB A HEIGHT FROM 6" ; O PRKG. LOT TO 0" 0 BUILDING �-- 30.57' 8 -2 ?: • .1 `k7. - 25' -12" RCP 0 1.00% 6' GATE VALVE & BOX 30' -8" PVC SDR 35 0 1.00% 24" X 24" STOP SIGN (TYP.)• -�. R43.24' R15.00' 53' -6' DIP CL. 52 CBMH -5 RE =912.62 INV =907 R13.86' R13.91' 24" X 24" STOP SIGN (TYP.) ;•EXI' •`1'.,N, . •\ •i�. • 4 CATC{•Bli)•N I& 12" P :AD.OPRCT11Nt,1` N1 \ en. ••• N 11.10' 1 88.00' 46' -15" RCP O 0.50% •f; •,...::u.,,2.,,.�..r° .:."""�`'"' 'BASIN: #j O,: • .. . . = INK ='9070!0 -• �� -` -°o ... .: ",.ay] • • . -�>le:..a_,. --.-g ' 1768 ; •.:.\ • ' ' 326 °S?'44'W EXISTNO ,CATON '1'- 8.00' ONNECT.'T01 • EXISTING �8" „ElIP 1231:55 • N22 °39'A8"E • • are..... ...... •_.-NA ..........• LEGEND EXISTING SANITARY SEWER Q WATER HYD. W/VALVE STORM SEWER •c1 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER - • - WATER - I HYD. W/VALVE - -I STORM SEWER - 44 DENOTES APPROXIMATE SOIL BORING LOCATION - FROM PSI REPORT, DATED 3/24/03 dire • , ...•••• 18" WDE SOLID WHITE UNE -PAINT (TYP.) ',3 •-I N dNNECT 6• 70 AT ' • •' •:i .; • � a EXIST 1 OL 4 : 'r . T 3 INV 947.93.: ' • 1 • x`. • ]: • ,t� •yA hS•.`ti`. • RECEIVED JUN 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES 'or r. 0' 20' 40' Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651- 454 -0002 Mn. Toll Free 1- 800 - 252 -1166 UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES: A. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATIONS AND /OR ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTIUTIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 8. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTIUTIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATION OF UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651- 454 -0002, OR 1- 800 - 252 -1166. C. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. D. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND BUILDING UTIUTY CONNECTIONS. E. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND GAS EXTENSIONS AND OTHER SERVICE UNES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SERVICE UNE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTIUTY COMPANIES. F. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITYS REQUIREMENTS AND THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN: 1. WATER UNES AND SANITARY SEWER MAIN SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ALL UTIUTY CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC WILL BE THE UABIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 3. WATERMAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTAWNG ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REOUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATERMAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE POLY WRAPPED IF REQUIRED BY CITY STANDARDS. 5. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. G. 6. SANITARY SEWER PLUGS AND CAPS SHALL BE SECURELY INSTALLED AT THE END OF SERVICE UNES TO ALLOW FOR PRESSURE TESTING OF SANITARY SEWER MAINS. 7. UTIUTY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 8. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH THE BUILDING SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 9. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN THE CURRENT MN/DOT "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION" SECTION 2105.3E1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 10. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD OR STREETS OR PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MN /DOT 2105.3E2. 11. DISINFECTION AND PRESSURE TESTING OF WATER UNES SHALL BE PERFORMED AND PAID FOR BE THE CONTRACTOR UNDER SUPERVISION OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE aTY WATER DEPARTMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY TESTING. THE COMPLETED WATERMAINS SHALL BE DISINFECTED FOR 24 HOURS WITH 50 PPM AVAILABLE CHLORINE. AT THE END OF THE DISINFECTION PERIOD, THE RESIDUAL SHALL BE AT LEAST 10 PPM WITHIN THE WATER MAIN. WATERMAIN SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED AT 200 PSI FOR 2 HOURS OR THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN THE CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN: 1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 2. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 52 WITH 7.5 MINIMUM COVER. PROVIDE MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 18" FROM SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER. INSULATE WATERMAIN IF LESS THAN 7.5 OF COVER. 3. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 4. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. DUCTILE IRON PIPE, CLASS 52 SHALL BE USED FOR DEPTHS GREATHER THAN 30 FEET. 5. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS 5 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) WITH R -4 GASKETS, OR HOPE STORM SEWER PIPE IF ALLOWED BY THE CITY. HOPE STORM PIPE SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M294, TYPE S WITH WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS WHERE RCP IS REQUIRED. H. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND UGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. -• TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. \1. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 60' J. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT RECORD OF UTIUTY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS -BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST- CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Y 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 9521937 -5150 Fax 9521937 -5822 1 baeb, =f/j, a = MY pis Iwo pre."y me r=arw +ti mponlia tad ea r ... eay ee..4 Aar899o.Al PIM=air W lm der Met of .e=wes Natal M. Parks, 2.8. Dec 06/06/03 18919 aaerwaa 1 w 06/0e/o3 Gn.s v„ R..4.4 (S. ) Rena Dr.lai SAS OUP DIG Prepared for. Discount Tire Company, Inc. 20225 N. Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85255 SURFACE ANALYSIS IMPERVIOUS 36,253 S.F. (73.3X) PERVIOUS 13,208 S.F. (26.7 %) TOTAL SITE ARE = 49,461.74 Discount Tire Lino Lakes, Minnesota D.tc 1 A -9 20031026.00SPP.0 41 6/7/03 a1.e"e. rS, r]a ('S Site, & Utility Plan nn3 W.olwnnd Prnf.,elnnnI Service.. LAKE DRIVE (C.SA.H. NO. 23) ONE WAY ► ■•�, 1'uI �,� pe nail /p �L J'�II Em my► � —C AC � © 2 —BHS 4 —IHD A D 'LAN NG BE 28 —DEC 7 —MEJ AC 0 B IR'IG'TED 3 TG 1 —CGS 7 —IHD 8 —MJJ — ■ �_ ri ` •1 3"" - r- tel CJ o � '� l3 r,� ol� 11 —NFS 5—S CJ Ni 1' • d3 _� 1 —MEJ 3 —IHD 2 —CGS 2— 2 —TGA HD 2 —TGA 2 —SKH 2 —TGA 7 —T 6 —AC 3 —TGA 4 —MJJ 13 —NFS Evergreen Detail le... 'iultinilanmrl *ma „nomI ' \ ":o • >r; .,,e.;. ...k4.- dyed -.a .4.3394.1... To of door Y w r.. lea) te to e.4 439.4 pooto Yaw Moor ]1x.7 P... Iwo. I.M]'1a'n.3.. ....rryY,w �.1� .sn 0.I.l rW M •.w.o rod ea .mwe.m a fob 1 l .w wyP+w�w"' 0* r raw at war n, ft at-•lw - d W w eaw.l b* ardry grad W row at hod Sot not 30 so r::h r *I p.a. oak m.. d. - rem 3. ..y .00-39 .404 edam Meal pre alb rrn.a Wad W Tree Detail Prune oat mbdwadd rand. Lim. Iwo*. Intact 34,.9 004 *tang 4 pifand lmN .4aW S- v0* lma.) rte e., brw. s.e-m a norm Y(mw) gen•r sv-wg red. w a 0' .o.l.r ...e or rr.m Plow 3 too or Moots dot. P 4.. b .a,l.lan sal W wdlro not .wl ar.r. oow a ear aim IC alp prwrpyw at adl.wy-y a mu 1 eK .a..up. Matra ..pang 4 pdod far: amp from youneldd upward to rat rend.. Plop a. M, MI d ale.we an al. aga.st So.4 Swiftly red. and battd0 of hats Sot root bd an undisturbed wave. of romPeetod sae mound matching b.. natural 3. undo, oda Soda. da gda ram, r do..ddring bade Boded Man, pre with padded 4040140 .d Shrub Detail RECEI Y tU JUN 1 3 2003 CiTY OF LINO LAKES gay0 d planting bode oda spoel804 *4940 Pouro dlacdnl to bon areas N pbntdg bsM Md woad 4. of padded nodal, ad ..d border hark early .Id. and bottom of bole Rena.. cool*. .t Pd moa an erneacrd Sad mend matching drum twat goon... Mal dnWod dla yeas eoari .10. podded buab. w Coll 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651- 454 -0002 Mn. Toll Free 1- 800 - 252 -1166 Planting Schedule OTT. KEY COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS 4 ABM Autumn Blaze Maple / Acer x freemantl 'Jeffersred 8 SKH Skyline Honeylowst / Gleditalc triacanthos var. Inennis .Skycole' 5 SWO Swamp %Ito Oak / Ouercus bicolor OVERSTORY CONIFEROUS 2 BHS Black Hills Spruce / Picea glouca densata 3 CGS Colorado Green Spruce / Plceo pungens 12 AN 28 DEC 50 AC 32 IHD 44 NFS 8 MEJ 12 MJJ 9 SCJ 31 TGA SHRUBS Annabelle Hydrangea / Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle' Dwarf European Cranberry Bush / Viburnum opulus 'Nanum' Alpine Currant / Ribes alpinum Ivory Halo Dogwood / Corpus alba 'Buffalo Neon Flash Spires Spirasa japonica 'Neon Flash' Madero Juniper / Juniperus scopulomm 'Madero' Mint Julep Juniper / Juniperus chinensis 'Menlo.' Scandia Juniper / Juniperus sabina 'Scandia' Techny Globe Arborvitae / Thuja occidental's ' Techny Globe' Planting Notes SIZE 2.5" 88 2.5" 88 2.r BB 6' 8B 6' 88 {L5 Cant. #5 Cont. #5 Cont. #5 Cont. #5 Cont. #5 Can #5 Cont. p5 Cont. y)5 Cont. Contractor shall provide one year guarantee of all plant materials. The guarantee begins on the date of the Owners acceptance of the Initial plantings. Replacement plant materials shall also have a one year guarantee commencing upon planting. All plants to be specimen grade, Minnesota -grown and /or hardy. Specimen grade shall adhere to, but Is not limited by, the following standards: All plants shall be free from disease, pests, wounds, scars, etc. All plants shall be free from noticeable gaps. holes, or deformities. All plants shall be free from broken or dead branches. All plants to be specimen grade, Minnesota -grown and /or hardy. All plants shall have heavy, healthy branching and leafing. Coniferous trees shall have an established main leader and a height to width ratio of no 1033 than 5:3. Plants to meet American Standard for Nursery Stock by AAN for type and size specified. Use minimum 12° loam planting soil on trees and 60 on shrubs (sides and bottom of hole). (sides and bottom of hole). Contractor shall verify locations with all utilities prior to installation of plants. Staking of trees optional: reposition if not plumb after one year. Wrop all smooth - barked trees- fasten top and bottom. Remove by Apnl 1. Open top of burlap on 8B materials•, remove pot on potted plants; spilt and break apart peat pots. split and break apart peat pots. Prune plants as necessary - per standard nursery practice and to correct poor branching. Contractor shall provide necessary watering of plant material until the plant Is fully established. Owner will not provide water for Contractor. Plante shall be immediately planted upon arrival at site. Properly heel in materials ff necessary, temporary only. All disturbed areas to be sodded unless otherwise noted All shrub planting beds (within sodded areas) shall have weed barrier fabric, 4' shredded hardwood bark mulch (except oe noted) and Volley -View Block Diamond (or equal) poly edging. The edging shall be at least four feet from the center of evergreen trees Four inches of shredded hardwood bark mulch shall be used around all trees. Two inches shredded bark mulch shall be used in all perennial and ornamental grass beds. Actual location of plant material Is subject to field and site conditions Repair, repplace. on provide sod /seed ace requ'ved for any roadway boulevard areas adjacent to the alto disturbed during construction. Provide irrigation to dl planted areas on site. Irrigation will be design/build by Landscape Contractor. All infromation about Installation and scheduling can be obtained from General Contractor. No plant material substitutions will be accepted unless approval is requested of the Landscape Architect by the Landscape Contractor prior to the submission of the bid and /or quotation. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION io 'Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952/937 -5150 Fax: 952/937-5822 1 MI, ew NY g` oda pored by se s soda fay db.d ...prof** d 0.. 4 a dory board 1AtserM Aeaal40Cro odor as Imo d the ssr d Mom., Ed J. Hayek Day, 06/11/03 pru 16454 D.iquet 7_.3939 posed Combat LS /d+de CPA 014* c7A Prepared for Discount Tire Company, Inc 20225 N. Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85255 Discount Tire Lino Lakkes, Minnesota 0' 20' DatE O / /U,7 40' 60' A -9 20031026PLP01.OBG addeC L1 oB • L1 Landscape Plan 26' -0" TOP OF PARAPET COLUMN AT ENTRANCE - BEYOND aik12.-0" BOTTOM OF LINTEL • Y TOP OF WAINSCOT pi40--0" TOP OF SLAB DSS cwitL�+IbO Ri?7yU,7�t1fRwil RRRDR�- wiw ftwamu iM? llrbesli ,..h . •:3 , 4 . I r 4v II t , SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8" a r-0" 26' -0" TOP OF PARAPET 0 24.-0" TOP OF LOWER PARAPET E.I.F.S. SYSTEM (TYP.) OVERHEAD STEEL DOOR 12' -0" TOP OF GLAZING ALUM. STOREFRONT W/ INSULATED GLAZING 2' -a" TOP OF WAINSCOT 0 - -0. TOP OF SLAB 26' -0" TOP OF PARAPET 12• -0" TOP OF GLAZING I I 11111migig *LENIN 211 \ I I 26' -0" TOP OF PARAPET E.I.F.S. SYSTEM (TYP.) C.M.U. ACCENT COURSE METAL ARC PLATE (TYP.) SEE 17/A6.1 ACCENT UGHTING BRICK VENEER (RUNNING BOND) ALUM. STOREFRONT W/ INSULATED LA ED GLAZING C.M.U. BASE WEST ELEVATION SCALE U8" 0' -0" TOP OF SLAB 2' -B TOP OF WAINSCOT TOP OF Sr,. TOP OF P ARAPET E.I.F.S. SYSTEM (TYP.) C.M.U. ACCENT COURSE ACCENT LIGHTING BRICK VENEER (RUNNING BOND) ALUM. STOREFRONT W/ INSULATED GLAZING C.M.U. BASE NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8" . r-0" I tab,. mall. Art 91.- w. pe4nd by re ma. .q abaci Impala. .d bat I s • tidy bard AJCOC18CT ode 8. Law d the Sadt d MAL..w.. David C. Parka Data U,,.. No 42456 Itnisicas DmImmck Clackab Mows Record Drawl/. bdd.ta Prepared for. Discount Tire Company, Inc. 20225 N. Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85255 0' -0" TOP OF SLAB RECEIVED JUN 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES EXTERIOR FINISH SPECIFICATIONS BRICK (MODULAR SIZE): BELDON BRICK JEWEL BLEND A al -OE VALOUR TEXTURE CM.U. BASE: ANCHOR BLOCK MOJAVE ROCK FACE CM.U. ACCENT: ANCHOR BLOCK SADDLE ROCK FACE 81FS. FIELD: DRYVIT SANDLSV00D BAKE QUARTZPUTZ 81.F.S. CORNICE: ORYVIT BUCKSKIN SA110 TEXTURE METAL 4P FLASHING FACTORY FINISH - TO MATCH BUCKSKIN NOTE: EXTERIOR MATERIALS SUBJECT TO FINAL 0134713 AND APPROVAL. =LEMONS TO MATCH C?Y Of LINO LAKES ORDINANCE N0. 1801, 31011817 A. SECTION B DESIGN GUIDELINES, N0. R MATERIALS UST. Discount Tire Lino Lakes, Minnesota 3 -30 20031026.0050P.3W3 Date 6/7/03 Sheet Al or A2 PRELIMINARY BUILDING ELEVATION 137' -3" 21' -10" 115' -6" 2t' -3" 21' -7" D 0 101 30' -0" 6' -5" 22' -0" 3' 22' -0" 3'— 22 12' -5" D. 21' -6" PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/8" . 1'-0" 15' -2" RECEIVED JUN 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES ed..a..y e.■y a., .sr d..., p.■..e y r o a..waoe al da.e supra." r s a ddra®..1 AYCIrciscT mde the n.. d the ara of weer David C Parker Data u®.. No. 42456 prepared for. dm Discount Tire Company, Inc. Draws what t..id.es ■ 20225 N. Scottsdale Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85255 Date: 6/7/03 X —XX 20031026.005PP.DWG Sheet A2 of A2 Discount Tire Lino Lakes, Minnesota PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN 3 3 0.0 2.1 02 5.2 2.2 0.1 0 ANoKA. (.0/...ilv TY. iv/G/7' kvA •;.• RIGHT-- OF- PLAT Na LAKE DRIVE (C.S.A.H. NO. 23) ONE WAY MillitillUill"111011111122110S" 1.0. 0 7 0 4.311114.- MOM 3:2 031 (.. 0.1 0:5 1.4 ' t 121 1.4 \ 4..8 2.2 24 2.4 30 2.4 iC 2.0 .Z.Z 2.3 1.6 2.3 2.0 I 2.5 2.4 2 a 3.5 44 22 2.1 3.8 3. 1 '2 01) 0.4 0.8; 11.3 1.0 iLL 0.0 I 1.2 • 0.0 5.< f"41 f -1 0 0 0.; 6.: O. 20,111111111 .4 o. 0.11 0. 0.3 G. • 6.3 6.* 3.9 0.7 06 5 0.3 • 64 6 0.5 E 5 O 4. 6.2 3:7 0.2 \te 3 5.2 0.1 51 V.1 5) 0.1 31) 51 6.1 61 0.1 b.; 6.1 .i.3.6.1.1--.64-5:4,--176-.37-7.1:7711 G.: 3a: 5 G.5 0. 0.2 5:1 0 1' 5.1 O.2 02 01 0.1 50 so 0.2 6.0 3:6 2.3 „,...79 OA <7, 4' 0*6 MO. 6 51744 10111 Of NI 4)00050 Se Of 031471111001 0010.0115000410 RUIN /0 015144. S111474.41011 SKIM 01011040 KR NOE WO 15 4.1 414160 0710711407r. 79.11111014 Of Mfr. /ND IPPIX.01 Plenco00 KCMG soCo /PILT 10 1116 ORM. NM 10 .111 MAWS fON 114 ONSIDE SCOOf 1544 AC COXIACTON EN Moore. rbt AL 00)00*104 COMM 41 013 SW OF 0706/0/13 MCI 041 Ms= 0 SOO/Pc 00 6 /01 76 IC MO 43 POP 0775511015 41115 MY MN 1500401 C001151411 WIN OMEN no015 N worm vo .1.40 1.10 W6001MI10 50610.061 5003007. woo 7NE 71747144 DR 07.05516 Of Pa 0004111110N. 4105165015000005011*0*1*051*050441041411)41)4000002 50 910074 Of MSC 111144111 00061000000100110 70 IC *WO MX 10 OMNI 001601141741. /K. 4411117 4 MANED f 110 47741100 Of 5010E15 DM EINNIVIS 1117044101110 41043501. NM WARS 7101114 PERM 11.05f 1414 mum 00 1)0 SOL 17111,4151 011 51,074151 111511470721 7Nf 110011410 EN %WM hf MUM 1197 Poe.. NC NW /01170151111117 NENSON 5 50701107 liff 575.5554 EON MR PC15015 Of 1NE NOM ON Sfk 000 NO1 411151. LARSON BINKLEY, INC. 8420eAngon Pe NE. rl A .t4.. At.Al Phone: (505) 822-3700 Fa. (505) 822-5154 unrw.larsonhireday.com coomon 414105 0,1 oi NOTE ALL FIXTURES SHALL BE TURNED OFF BY 1 HOUR AFTER CLOSING. EXCEPT FOR SECURITY LIGHTING, SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 11)1 15 o.0 ----- 135 0.0 00 0.2 C.0 1' T C LUMINAIRE LOCATIONS tomato Doscriotion Na LBW X Y 100 00 1 0 tau 210 trio 2 0 02.4 312 160 3 0 113 31.4 16.0 4 0 114.3 011.6 16.0 3 1413 71 132.3 27.0 5 1445 47.1 16.4 27.0 7 1. 520 -36..3 270 STATISTICS Symbol Doscriotion BY9 Max Cbsob*on MINNA Avg.. Proo4ny Plte 5.4)4 10.10 0.00 N / A NIA Pootlnq Lot 2.61c 10.1 le 0.44* 35.11 7.1:1 CalaY140 *et N.. awl Nut* 1744700711.4 P":4c4:.P:rmits.nr/Attt dm. Prepared for: dcp do. Discount Tire Company, Inc. LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Symbol Lab41 06 Calolop Nurot./ Cbsob*on Lam Lumen. Yoblet iff:3- 0 4 P10SA17510010 ARCHITECRWAL • PERI04ASHIELE111 0 1471 INIELDINO 175 WATT. EON. CLEAR, PETAL HALIOE. BURNED HOMONTAL 12000 210 111 • L 1 710.30000.30P ARCHNECTURN. • 1.04/371UFORIA IA • RCS SERIE! REFL: BRIGHT MP ALUMINUM ENCL CLEAR. FLAT GLASS 400W HALIDE 32400 mo 0 • 1-140 2 RCS-0100.1G. 00 NA0NUF010.111 REFLECTOR: SPECULAR AL1045606 ENCLOSURE: CLEAN FLAT GLASS N.. NAL= 33000 410 . 2. AM the Arturo, above am manufactured by Hubbell 4.4111I0g. A PGS-A Sofas c -I A 14 112 * 360 mm e 14' 7 1" 3560102 131 nim 5 1/2" 140 mm A PVL.PT TD 1 A. 2 711r 62 300 2 VT 13 314' 12 1;4" 64 mm 342 /rim 2)711001 E 127 mm C RCS A 11.00" 203 nub 14.25. 4/3 11141 23.50 . adi mm 20225 N. Scottsdale Road Scottsdale. Arizona 85255 : vzs. ..•••• NRTUC Appk..151/000 um- Idiot, sub..) for *worm lighting applleA lone as w4loseoremarrial and andil nuking aatorior wall and annallzhtirg fee parNng off.* !midi ma, gloms_ shopping mutant, lam ler.rd 1)4050 ,6111*. hanks, avarahourme. and parking paragas. Tyska mounting Night is 72-10(34 maims). ClItaft LumIrtaits Ideal for anterior verm and orma light oprmostions sham sharp cutoff is rag uired. This magi k firkin N5 *0156 lad ndjuatabk cutoff 115151* 60 rain.: light frescos. and high a imk glans. Rehr HOUSing Ona-piera. Now duty, 8. oast aluminum for bng Sto and worm operation. Bones LaktrooataB finish k standard. Mounts over 314 ' and 4' reenssed juneNon tax. Tnn15" side anti. for surface condra mowing. Reflector Pmaision formed hummed aluminum for optimum pleonasms. Front Atzcsa Lit is:Dour At-so/ably FuN Wont amass le available by busing front dot Too Hubbell Contra tam haod loslanera poddor tipte **al lo dear gaga. Dia coat akIminum door (rams agh prow:Wm Laktrocatel• finish smormay holds a thick clear bolosiliosts aloes tans. Glass lhenred shook and Ingram r”istani. Casigned icr provide a rsclangular Wolf &Irk...Mon. Ballast 01110 H (mutated. -45.F *Wino (.206. for MB. 5) Hz HPF. Additional F Piton t. Monza Laktrocole finish: now Md. photocontrot hub carder Bald Innate:1 PBT 5a6m): ocoesamy moureing brockat for single and double pole mounted Par intuited luminaires rPti..PT): medium baba ackliet (lamp inoludadz through bran)h mind Ann front door smi gasket dasker capable a nithatanding UL5B5 marina harm dram • s • ..5:444.5:•5555:ta..22.5 NRTUC H ouSing Lightweight. lugged. one pew famed and wattled land:intim tin smooth coos:mama and wenthorninonng. PN-drdlod tot rwanating. B allast Factory triOtAlited to 443010004404 stoel ond benison *licit 6PICTIOT5 10 614 WO: fur :iniday. 125-C inanSolost .20113 sustins (.45 T MPS}, EIS Hz. HPF waist. 5O - tnnstg: Nasty. Laos Door Frame &tuned tame with 610 corn.sr Irectag and Wes cast Sao kitatias tool-nto may. Duality goskonng asthma :BMWS, dirt, and nxiaklia. Cormrogvo silk screening :..mncoaki ofeebsta tompantount. Labe Flut :woo id and i55)00) roulahmt gtass 14186s0ooks/0 Finish Eluotmotoktogy aonnod powdef Cording. high *4*0lout:3840* banded to IntflaC:ts let maximum sdhontora and fintsk hardnoas. Listings Gaszetzd to, wl W(405507 ynoWel 01. (.13A44:21130 curfdlod fur oeldect Linz Socket Heavy duty mogul:Awe pans:lain with SyOng ktedad tante, COMMA tor posaire grip bad v12,r44s)0 1o5kst21102. Shoot: • OF • Discount Tire Lino Lakes, Minnesota PRELIMINARY SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRICS • • • AGENDA ITEM V. E. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: July 9, 2003 TOPIC: Final Plat: Century Farm North BACKGROUND The preliminary plat for Century Farm North was approved by the City Council on April 28. The developer has submitted the final plat for phase 1. Under the new subdivision ordinance, final plats are to be reviewed by the P & Z. This is the first final plat to which the new requirement applies. The developer has requested that the City Council approve the final plat on July 14. This leaves only three business days between the P & Z and Council meetings. Staff has agreed to schedule these meetings, though at the time of writing this report several issues remain, as described below. A final plat submitted June 23 includes platting individual lots for units in phase one of the approved phasing plan. This includes 56 units: 17 single family detached townhomes and 39 single family lots. Of the 39 SF lots, nine of them in Block 4 will be airpark lots. ANALYSIS As required by the subdivision ordinance, the following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board or the City Council: a. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. b. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for forty (40) percent of lots in the preceding phase. This paragraph applies only when the preceding phase consists of forty (40) or more lots. c. City Attorney approval of the status of title /property ownership related to the final plat. • d. Completed development contract including all required financial securities and timeframe for final plat and final grading completion. • • e. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. f. All fees, charges, and escrow related to the preliminary or final plat shall be paid in full. Conformance With Preliminary Plat (a): The submitted final plat includes the phase one lots with the remainder of the site in outlots. Outlot I creates a lot around an existing single family home. This was not included in the approved preliminary plat or phasing plan: this home was to be removed. It adds an extra dwelling unit beyond the approved phasing plan, and creates a lot that has no road frontage (or access), no sanitary sewer or water service, and that is only 7954 sf. While it may or may not be worthwhile retaining this existing house, if it is to be retained it must be on a lot that meets the minimum requirements. No lot without sewer and water can be less than 10 acres. Staff suggested combining Outlots I, D, and E. This would leave the house on an outlot of 18+ acres. Dividing this outlot could be resolved in the future, perhaps with a new preliminary plat that incorporates the house. At the time this report was written, this issue is unresolved. Staff and the developer will discuss this prior to the meeting. A new final plat must resolve this prior to staff recommending approval. Completion of Preceding Phase (b): This is the first phase of the project, so the `minimum completion' clause doesn't apply. However, it will apply to subsequent phases. It is expected that the final plat for phase two will be submitted for approval early in January 2004. With construction beginning in mid -2003, it is unknown if 40% of phase one (22 units) will be sold and have building permits issued. Title (c): The title commitment and the final plat must be submitted to the City Attorney in time for an opinion for the City Council meeting. Among other things, the City Attorney compares the title commitment with the signature page of the plat to ensure all persons with property interest are represented on the signature page. Development Agreement and Fees (d) and (f): The City Engineer is assembling the development agreement. This requires cost estimates that serve as the basis of the financial securities. In addition, trunk utility fees and outstanding charges are collected along with the securities. Conditions of Approval (e): Resolution 03 -60 approved the preliminary plat and lists conditions of approval (see attached). The development agreement often includes conditions that cannot be met prior to construction. For example, the phasing plan is an • • • ongoing requirement. Location of airplane hangers and wetland easement signs are other examples. However, other conditions should be met prior to final plat approval to ensure they get done. Condition #7 requires review of airplane hanger design prior to final plat approval. The attached drawings show the proposed hanger design. In addition to the drawings, the draft homeowner covenants include the following restrictions: Airplane Hangers. Airplane hangers are permitted on Air Park Lots subject to the Lino Air Park North Declaration, the Permit and the following additional restrictions: (a) Any airplane hanger constructed upon an Air Park Lot shall be built in conformance with all building codes and regulations of the City and other governmental and quasi - governmental entities having jurisdiction over the Air Park Lots and over Outlot B, Lino Air Park North, and its use as a private air strip. (b) Aircraft hangers and their construction and location upon an Air Park Lot, are subject to prior approval by the Committee. (c) Airplane hangers must meet the following minimum criteria: (i) Architectural compatibility with living units located upon the Air Park Lot including color (earth tones only) and architectural style, although they may be constructed with metal sidewalls. (ii) Must not exceed 3200 square feet. (iii) Sidewall height of not less than twelve feet nor more than eighteen feet. (iv) Not less than one entry door. (v) An overhead clear span door a minimum of ten foot wide and eight foot high. (vi) 3/12 maximum roof pitch. (vii) Roof color coordinated with sidewall color. (viii) 36 inch sidewall overhang and 18 inch gable overhang. (ix) A forty foot clear span door on the gable end facing the applicable taxi way. (x) Such additional aesthetic detail as the (Air Park Architectural Control) Committee may designate including, but not limited to, windows and window treatments, louvers and landscaping. (xi) Any improved apron fronting the taxi way door of the airplane hanger not to exceed ten feet in length. (d) Commercial use (including space rental) of any airplane hanger is not permitted. • • These (or a revised version) would be included in the covenants on the property. However, the City has no authority to enforce private covenants. Therefore, the City should consider including such requirements in the development agreement. Condition #8 requires City review of the homeowner association documents. Drafts have been submitted and forwarded to the City Attorney. Condition #10 refers to the unresolved park dedication question. A new plan illustrating park dedication has been received. It indicates 4.7 acres of contiguous upland and another 3.1 acres of upland that is not contiguous. This acreage is acceptable. However, the subdivision ordinance requires that dedicated upland, at a value of $28,000 per acre, be subtracted from a total cash amount calculated at $1665 per dwelling unit. Other credits can be subtracted as well. In discussion with the Public Services Director, the following park dedication scenario is proposed: TOTAL CASH CONTRIBUTION previously total new cash per total units platted units unit total 249 8 241 $ 1,665 $ 401,265 VALUE OF LAND DEDICATION upland acres 7.813 addl. acres for east trail 0.060 addl. acres for north trail 0.250 per acre total dedication credit 8.123 $ 28,000 $ (227,444) OTHER construction of concrete sidewalk (5') and bituminous trail (8') $ (70,000) balance: cash dedication $ 103,821 That is, the land indicated on the "Preliminary Park Plan" of June 23, 2003 would be dedicated. Upland would be credited toward the park dedication as would two small additional pieces to preserve the potential for future trail connections. Construction of the sidewalk and trail would be credited. The listed cash balance would be dedicated as well. Staff has not discussed this proposal in any depth with the developer. The developer and city staff will meet prior to the P & Z meeting to discuss this proposal to resolve the park dedication. Condition #15 requires additional right of way for Sunset Road. While the right of way is shown on the plat, the dedication statement on the signature page does not include it. This must be corrected. Other Final Plat Requirements: The subdivision ordinance includes specific requirements for all plats. One is that monument locations be shown on the final plat. The submitted plat includes a statement that monuments will be located in the future. l • • Monuments are needed for setback measurements for new homes new structures, and fences. Because monument location and placement is vital to locating property lines, the City requires that these must be shown on the plat. Easements have been included over stormwater facilities in phase one areas. Additional easements will be necessary over future phases when they are final platted. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the final plat. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION At the time of writing this report, the above issues remained unresolved. Staff will meet with the developer prior to the P & Z meeting and bring additional information to the meeting. If the above issues cannot be resolved, staff will not recommend approval. Assuming the issues listed above are satisfactorily resolved, staff recommends Option 1. • • • A'S CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03-60 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MUSA RESERVE ALLOCATION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN FOR CENTURY FARM NORTH WHEREAS, the City has received applications for developing an area known as Century Farm North; and WHEREAS, the development requires approval of the allocation of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) reserve and approval of a preliminary plat/planned unit development stage plan; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on December 11, 2002 and was continued to January 8, 2003 and February 12, 2003; and WHEREAS, the proposed MUSA allocation and preliminary plat/planned unit development stage plan meet the requirements of the City's Growth Management, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 12 -03 rezoning the site to Planned Unit Development for residential development; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the MUSA allocation and preliminary plat/planned unit development stage plan for Century Farm North with the following conditions: 1. A total of 55.0 acres of MUSA shall be allocated for the project, and the project's 249 residential units shall be developed in accordance with the following phasing plan, which is illustrated on Attachment A: year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 total MUSA acres to be Allocated 15.3 11.4 13.5 5.4 9.4 55.0 Lots to be final platted 56 65 52 43 33 249 2. A cul de sac will be constructed at the east terminus of the new Carl Street within Century Farm North. Carl Street will not be connected to the existing Carl Street as part of the Century Farm North development. 3. The driveway of Lot 7, Block 6 be shifted eastward to the extent possible. • • • 4. The submitted townhome housing types and building elevations be modified to specify finish materials and be subject to City approval. Side walls facing public streets shall include windows or other architectural features to avoid the appearance of a blank wall. 5. Lots 1 -3, Block 4 shall be "airpark" lots. If these or other designated airpark lots are to be converted to non - airpark lots in the future, depending on the extent of changes to the design or configuration of the lots and roads, this could require replatting and a PUD amendment, at the City's discretion. 6. The applicant provide documentation to the City that all applicable runway safety requirements have or will be satisfied. The runway safety zone requirements are herebay established as a zoning restriction. As shown on the preliminary plat, the restricted area is measured from the edge of a 200' wide strip centered on the runway. At 126' from the edge, the maximum structure height is 18'. At 175' from this edge, the maximum structure height is 25'. The structure height maximum limit shall follow the slope of this imaginary surface and shall continue to extend over the development. 7. Specific hanger designs be submitted subject to City approval prior to consideration of the final plat approval of the lots with the hangers. 8. All homeowner association by -laws be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney prior to consideration of the final plat for lots where the association applies. 9. The wetland mitigation plan be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. All conditions imposed by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be satisfied. The filling of land intended to be upland for park dedication must be accepted with the mitigation plan. 10. Park dedication shall include cash as well as land, shall include the trail across the 2nd Addition to the eastern plat boundary, and include rough grading of the park land. Generally, park land shall be as indicated on the "Parks /Open Space" plan submitted in the April 2003 booklet. However, a new preliminary plat shall be submitted that clearly shows the park dedication lands, along with upland data for all areas intended to be dedicated as parkland. This data shall be reviewed to ensure acceptability prior to final plat approval. There must be a minimum of 4.5 (four and one -half) acres of contiguous upland useable for active recreation uses as determined by the Public Services Director, and a minimum of 7.0 (seven) acres total upland. The cash dedication may, at the City's discretion, be reduced by the cost of trail construction or other in -kind activities by the developer. Trail locations within the park areas shall be determined by the overall park design. The final park dedication shall be included in the development agreement, which must be reviewed by the City Council for approval. • • • 11. Grading, drainage and utility related modifications and comments as recommended by the City Engineer in the attached memorandum (dated April 16, 2003) shall be addressed and incorporated into the plans. 12. The project is subject to the results of the sewer feasibility study. 13. The project is subject to the City's determination of the number of residential units to be allowed to connect to the City water system, based on the system's ability to provide adequate service, prior to the construction of the infrastructure needed to provide service to the units. 14. The project is subject to all requirements of Anoka County regarding access to Sunset Road/CR 53. 15. Additional right of way for Sunset Road/CR 53 shall be dedicated, to total 60' from centerline, within all areas of the plat. 16. The City formally vacate the segment of Carl Street as needed for developing this plat. 17. The airplane hangers in Lots 1 -4 and Lot 9, Block 4 (Phase 1) shall be built on the runway side of the houses, with the houses fronting on the road rather than the houses on the runway side of the lots. 18. Signs shall be installed along all wetland buffer /easement areas. Wetland easements shall extend, at a minimum, 10 feet outward from the delineated wetland boundary. 19. This resolution shall not be effective until the rezoning approved by Ordinance 12 -03 is in effect. 20. Elements of the project not specifically designed or addressed in the plans and supporting documents are subject to the standards of the zoning ordinance. R -1 standards will apply to single family detached portions, the R -3 standards to the multi - family attached portions. 21. Prior to consideration of a final plat, a revised preliminary plat shall be submitted for City review to ensure that it reflects approved revisions. 22. This approval is based on the following plans and information, and supporting documentation: Existing Conditions Plan, received January 31, 2003 Preliminary Plat, dated January 20, 2003, received January 31, 2003 Preliminary Site Plan, dated January 20, 2003, received January 31, 2003 Phasing Plan (data April 18, plan sheet April 23, 2003) Preliminary Landscape Plan, dated January 20, 2003, received January 31, 2003 • • • Preliminary Grading Plan, dated March 20, received March 28, 2003 Preliminary Utility Plan, dated March 20, received March 28, 2003 Townhome Building Elevations, received April 2003 Alternative Airpark Lot Layout, received January 31, 2003 City Engineer Comments dated April 16, 2003 Public Services Director Comments (Park Board) dated August 6, 2002 and December 4, 2002 23. Prior to commencing site work on Century Farm North, the developer must supply a plan that includes pond reconfiguration, tree planting, landscaping, and buffering for the pond south of the air park which incorporates neighborhood concerns and is acceptable to the City as approved by the City Council. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2003. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor CENTURY FARM N 1sT 0! 61N 000. C:APro lects\0.41- Greg- 2\FQITOR PARCCLS30- 001\IMOE -re.i tons- Io-10- 02163 000111lo- 06- 02ges-s..oTICN -Ioep 0/2212007 013711 70 CST OUnOT B ifitct-ii.siesr Ni Af 5W eh iOn 6734° Phasing 2003 — Phase 1 56 Total 2004 — Phase 2 65 Total 2005 — Phase 3 52 Total 2006 — Phase 4 43 Total 2007 — Phase 5 33 Total 249 Total Units 1 RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (200X26001 RUNWAY 122.X22002 CCMENUMC _ SAFETY ZONE A (2405X1707) RUNWAY OVERRUN/ DISPLACED THRESHOLD a0 1 i RUNWAY SAFETY AREA RECEIVED APR 2 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES S a �Q m CD.IURY Apo THRU 600 ADO. IIP• 45, ---- a.5.50.n iv • Mt( CI it OU7LOT OU7Loric --- 2,.cuTo. • -,139,•9-....9 01,20,e103 .000 0., CS, •mama rmisssiaks ,zogrobrotee auzsimisme Tout..,FAtuaz -a-rizawmas aaricattswe atice! rl. slam_ __me GRAPHIC SCALE 50 102 ( FEET ) 1 1.0 000 0. *VW ,e61.4,41ANY 11-"fr tL " .,..„.....2 ,--- -----'7",- „.1 IIIKVIMIliiiiIMNITORPrireeiralia_tri:""Laant „T.,,,,, • I ....t. ‘ ri........, -040' ../.....‘... ...".• ....,. - - ---..gRil:c.JEMI!!1 --__ •••■•• .. i ;T: ....--------. :. Mt A \ , , ks, .),-. aret■ 10 Er's! 4 1151 ...7...:::::n -----.....Th I \ • . 10155.05 :0001. 4 =0 . I I Ini 05[05/5 --- A1 1 CrEir 0 gr/$111.■-tW .I „Now' .,..„ i. , ,.___..... ri.... YU . ' , . 1 410:•,e7,0, 11' Is> ...... I 14 • \ \\:\ _ -UPP-br A RUNVIAX-SAikr?AEA (20C X2600) • ....... j ...... \ _ • '„RUNWAY /11.E.I AREA • : RUNWAY. OVERRUN / -/ DISPLACED THRESHOLD . , 1, \ i ... 24 • : . 1--"-"---- \ \ - ....--. 1 --.... ::::==.,..... • t ; a d'•'• i 1 .-•'• i i / -•:::•2'.. 4 - .1- - 1 I I , S1 C4TURr FARM NORTF4 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Uhde /Doyton Investment, LLC. a Minnesoto Limited Liability Company, fee owner, and Century Farm North Development, Inc., o Minnesoto Corporation, contract purchaser and Builders Development & Finance, Inc.. a Minnesota Corporation, mortgagee. of the following described property situated in the State of Minnesota, County of Anoka to wit: Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 1, LINO AIR PARK NORTH, occording to the recorded plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, AND Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, Block 1. SUNSET OAKS, according to the recorded plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesoto, AND Lot 5, Block 1, SUNSET OAKS, except the West 184.18 feet thereof, according to the recorded plot on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoko County, Minnesota, AND Lot 1, Block 1. HIDDEN POND. according to the recorded plot on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoko County, Minnesota, AND Outlots 8, C. and D, BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION. according to the recorded plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka, County, Minnesota. AND The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22. Anoka County, Minnesoto. AND That portion of vacated Pinto Lane which lies northwesterly of the centerline of Pinto Lone together with that part of said vacoted Pinto Lone which lies southeosterly of the centerline of Pinto Lane as dedicated in BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION, and was accrued by Outlet C, soid BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 511-1 ADDITION, occording to the recorded plat on file in the office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota. That portion of said vacated Pinto Lone is described as follows: That part of Pinto Lone dedicoted in BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION. Anoka County, Minnesota. according to the recorded plot on file in the office of the County Recorder, which lies easterly of a line commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 21, Block 3. BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION; thence North 0 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the westerly line of said Lot 21, 24.80 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing North 0 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds East, 80.61 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the left. 91.12 feet, said curve having 0 radius of 330.00 feet and a delta angle of 15 degrees 49 minutes 12 seconds. to the westerly line of said Pinto Lone; thence northerly along said westerly line of Pinto Lone to the northerly line of BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION and there terminating. AND That port of vacated Carl Street lying westerly of the Northerly extension of the East line of Lot 17. Block 1, LINO AIR PARK NORTH. according to the recorded plot on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota and easterly of the northerly extension of the westerly line of said Lot 16, Block 1, SUNSET OAKS, according to the recorded plot on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Anoka County. Minnesoto. AND That part of vacated Laurie Avenue which lies within the above described properties. Said vocation per Document No. 1462634. AND The Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Ronge 22. except those parcels described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7. Township 31, Range 22, thence South along the West line of said Southwest Ouarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7; o distance of 120 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter o distance of 360 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to a point of intersection with the North line of the said Northwest Quarter; thence Westerly along the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the point of beginning, and also except: That port beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quorter of the Northwest quarter of Section 7. thence East along the South line of soid Northwest Quarter a distance of 285 feel; thence North and parallel with the West line of the said Northwest Quarter o distance of 175 feet, thence West and parallel with the South line of the said Northwest Quorter to a point of intersection with the West line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South along the West line of said Northwest Quorter to the point of beginning; and also except: That part of the Southwest Ouarter of the Northwest Quorter of Section 7. Township 31, Ronge 22. described as follows: Beginning at o point on the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distont 536 feet South of the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence East parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quorter o distance of 1047 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quorter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 208 feet; thence West porallel with the North line; of soid Southwest Quorter of the Northwest Quorter o distance of 1047 feet to the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North along soid West line a distance of 208 feet to the point of beginning, and also except: That port of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quorter of Section 7, Township 31, Ronge 22. described as follows: Beginning of a point on the West line of said Southwest Quorter of the Northwest Quarter distance 328 feel South of the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quorter of the Northwest - Quorter; thence East parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quorter of the Northwest Quorter o distance of 1047 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouarter a distance of 208 feet; thence West parollel with the North line of said Southwest Quorter of the Northwest Quorter a distance of 1047 feet to the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North along said West line o distance of 208 feet to the point of beginning, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND Excepting the following described parcels of property. Thal port of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoko County, Minnesoto described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7; thence North 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds West on on assumed bearing, along the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouorter of Section 7 a dislonce of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing on said bearing of North 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds West along said West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouarter of Section 7 o dislonce of 150.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 32 minutes 14 seconds East along o line parallel with the South line of soid Southwest Quorter of the Northwest Ouorter of Section 7 a distance of 759.5 feet; thence South 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds East along o line parallel with said West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouorter of Section 7 o distance of 150.00 feet; thence South 87 degrees 32 minutes 14 seconds West along a line parallel with South line of the Southwest Quorter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 759.50 feet to the point of beginning, subject to a county rood over the West 33 feet. AND That port of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing of the Southwest corner of soid Southwest Ouorter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7; thence North 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds West on on assumed bearing, along the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 o distance of 325.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing on said bearing of North 00 degrees 37 minutes 22 seconds West along said West line of the Southwest Quorter of the Northwest Quorter of Section 7 0 distance of 150.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 32 minutes 14 seconds East along a line parallel with the South line of said Southwest Ouorter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a dislonce of 759.50 feet; thence South 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds East along a line parallel with said West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 150.00 feet; thence South 87 degrees 32 minutes 14 seconds West along a line parallel with said South line of the Southwest Quorter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 759.50 feet to the point of beginning. subject to a county rood over the West 33 feet. CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 7, T31, R22 Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as CENTURY FARM NORTH and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the parks, lanes, trail and circle and also dedicate the easements as shown on the plot for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said Uhde /Dayton Investment, LLC, o Minnesoto Limited Liability Company, hos caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this of 200_. Signed Gary M. Uhde, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Investment. LLC, o Minnesota Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesoto My Commission Expires 200_ by Gory M. Uhde, as Chief Manager of Uhde /Dayton In witness whereof said Century Farm North Development, Inc., o Minnesota Corporation, hos caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this 200_ Signed Gory M. Uhde, President doy doy of STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument wos acknowledged before me this day of 200_ by Gary M. Uhde, as President of Century Form North Development, Inc., o Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires In witness whereof said Builders Development & Finance, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, hos caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this 200— Signed William T. Keenan III, President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200_ by William T. Keenan III, as President of Builders Development & Finance, Inc., a Minnesoto Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires day of I hereby certify that I hove surveyed and plotted the property described on this plat as CENTURY FARM NORTH and that this plot is a correct representation of said survey. that all distances ore correctly shown on the plot in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been or will be correctly placed in the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines ore correctly designated on said plat and that there are no wet lands os defined in M5 505.02, Sub. 1. or public highways to be designated other than os shown on soid plat. Ronald P. Alwin, Land Surveyor Minnesoto Registration No. 17765 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificote was ocknowledged before me this day of 200_ by Ronold P. Alwin, Land Surveyor. Notary Public, County. Minnesota My Commission Expires This plat of CENTURY FARM NORTH was approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesoto this day of 200— and if applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer hove been received by the city or the prescribed 30 day period hos elopsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesoto Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. (� By Mayor By Clerk This plot hos been checked and approved this doy of 200.. Larry Hoium Anoko County Surveyor IN SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS 5 3 12 3 Zvi - - - - - -_ 285.00 .. A C4TUX FARM N0R71 -I MATCH LINE B (SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS) 57.99 60 STREET 338.01„ S8r32'07 W eDo 4-,1444 Qcs unu300 660 N-- OPEN IRON PIPE N8r29'16"E 561.61 y VTILITYGEASEMENT - W 3 LAND 42 rJ , IQ, PARK 2 ORA6AGE AND S •:• • 4 UTILITY EASEMENT IN �SSS6g \���A�A I y THROUGHOUT ALL IP PARK 2 ., 506.42'14 ^E ` 41.69 ��' .5M8.111- 1<_ 1 .. %6.5 100.00 1I N8729'16'E _475 .o e rv, 60 4 N872040 E % ?�, CENTURY TRIL0.4o•w 619 RLS 5332 184.33 S87'20'40 "W 1i 05 1s- co est 413'300• I �AV �O 1 6-' 14 0..3300' • • .., 5 OAKS 173.60 686•58 34 985.58'30 21 .00 -. DRAINAGE ANO UTILITY EASEMENT ..CNJ 57.11 38:31.S91- -'2yD +� PARK 1 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THROUGHOUT N87'30'39'E ALL OF PARK 1 ' - SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET 211.19 )• I :w OUTLdIT A I �rMy��o 21 I 2C: 1 19 371.82 ,;4 5'8'7°17'46"W 0\ 00 X00 $5 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS THUS: STREET 10.00 10.00 1 L.-- 5.00 L L -10.00 [TO. 00 REAR LINE f BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AND REAR LOT LINES. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. CUTLJT �YD 272.26 S8r30'39 "W / / / DENOTES DELINEATED WET LANDS z_ 0 (SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS) • DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT MARKED R.L.S. 17765 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. meas. DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE ALL MONUMENTS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTE, AND NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT, AND SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY RLS 17765. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE NORTH LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N87 °36'19 "E. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 0 50 100 200 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 7, T31, R22 4 00 MN ( IN FEET 1 1 inch - 100 0.. DETAIL 1 INCH = 50 FEET 0 , \ 89.52 S87''.06'51 "E 20.08 2042 _ "M - � 556 14.11 371.82 S8T17'46 "W \p ; c - L =7.81 \ R =300.0 by a p A= r29'31 0 .'S a 1 CB =N36'54'S "E 'Iy,TO.'\. Z• 4k4 \g4 ' \o�\ .A '9. I 'A1m F+ 214 c \ „w ° C.31. ;5 G /vc Aq0 ry • " of O t.. a 1 O M• • 211.19 -� S8T30'39 "W c; c .9(i.4:, •/3 i7 t ` CI I • 4_ RECEIVED JUN 2 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES A`%°119I111111iE[I91gVIkT I L&ND s SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS so NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE ZOO Too ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 100 ft. CENTURY FARM NORTH DETAIL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS THUS: STREET 10.00 J I- I I I I I - 5.00 5.00 --►I I II 410.00 I 10.00 10.00 REAR LINE 1 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AND REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERMSE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. MATCH LINE C (SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS) 196.,, 5 N67'36'23•0 115.16 587'36'23 w N9 — tN �P 7 1 —7-1313M--11 - -\ � � 34N8851•4' J.�— f g Easement confinement per 4 agreement with powenine company • B5� N73ro3� 3 o9 �T OUTLOT D 50],,69 E _ 586'28'34.4 15.00 12566 5� 17 1 00`8 56'1-6 OP H rt03A r NNA� pSEMENt OR .1Sy E 40.37 586'28'34 W 6 `I`i yUR ANO V—' UTILITY UTY O EASEMEU ENT 4.126.71 R.33c Wp —p.2 16 i11 '4`..21°°° 1 ..� N87'58'34 "E 165.00 62 9 3 m162395 60 E 5875834 W 15. 1 a 13 226.14 5 N87'30 32 E —1 30 12 I m m 219.79 J OUTLOT E 1 ` 40 30 CENTER Of SEC. 7, T31, R22 RLS 5332 4' =- DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1663.10 (( S87e30'32 "W 1 " DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT,' 4400 r 706.30 .t ei w w 6 8 5 5 1 INCH = 60 FEET CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 7, T31, R22 587'32'07'4 335.00 S8•31'56 "W ., .� ' 350.19 RLS 5332 • IRON PIPE OPEN X11 Sep W4 / /i / / I// 1`T //, 1 Easement confinement per // tlin t Nh � /�� .2( � CCoompppany thers"PiPNine � � / L'I' -I- / IS' / DENOTES DELINEATED WET LANDS • DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT MARKED R.L.S. 17765 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. meas. DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE ALL MONUMENTS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTE, AND NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT, AND SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY RLS 17765. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE NORTH LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N87 °36'19 "E. RECEIVED JUN 2 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES METRO LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS GRAPHIC SCALE . too 000 .0 PK NAIL N O N 0 ON PK NAIL ( IN FEET 1 inch = 100 It. El`c °' N87-36'19"E 360.00 CNTU RM NOT - NORTH LINE OF 1140 0 I/O OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 7, 131, R22 SUNSET ROAD / (COUNTY ROAD NO 53) 1 PK NAIL M I SUNSET ROAD O V / (COUNTY ROAD NO 53) - 33 2 � o PK NAIL 11 C.!` � I \ 1 802.21 1047.00 887°36'19"W N87°36' 19 "E 2220.60 NORTH CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 7, T31, R22 320.00 N87'36'19 -E N87 36'19 -E 1047.00 N87°36' 19 "E 1047.00 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT -.. n N22'09'43'8 N 'I T i 63 00 �k 524.24 R.LS. 5332 230.00 OUTLOT G (2 S87•36'19- L OUTLOT F 2 It. 150' DRAINAGE AND U11U7Y EASEMENT `, - Off` - !, ♦ - ______._ ..,.1x1 '6�'i_ ..., N34.2103:4,_977 47 N88.53.4N18-Er_36___19-E _ .7,A_E:E.._---- !,_____ ./____ _ _____„... _ _ _ _29;77'2 _ 1y� i N87'36'23'E ` `58776 "2J w 0, j Eaweoml cone rowel Per Pending :::,i107.361,605.;:.23.. 60 N 0'. N O at • - - -- 285.00 - -_ -- OUTLOT C 759.50 S87°32'07 "W N87°32'07 "E 474.00 OUTLOT B 338.01 473.71 S87 °32'07 "W R.L.S. 10832 o_' 76.00 8321% O.W yy X60. DD�OOZ .20-E" 25-E; ''N89°40'11.E(T, PARK 3 v.00 77.96 .14 17 4. p -- 95.00 -71 � p1 g,+, "1 ,rd. ryo ,._58792'24 :vt 1 .'n N7 F ' J. ' , 7Po y\ s t-0„-,,3,41,/ s> `` / '481 g o ,..,,,,,,J,-; ±v w`I,, 1 Z B� 1 • / 2+ 7 \ - _Op`TO. ■ i y m y '�° ``i 1^ f 508.03'51 "8 Ia - 43.00 R.L.S. 10832 / 56.00 014058'23'E , y 4 m /JP f Po v. 4? ?,'SSOS.r�515 4 O I I , %' 1:,. VA, 4 1i' (e,,::,1:1 O? .o • P. 'i g16.000 ' 1 1-' 1400600 '`,X1 I�_,v , 2 O .\. ... 414% /r 55370.0E - - .VO ` i 2 ° 1 ^m 9N , N8745.42 1 -E 31,00 4l 74 >1w`n 22 ,w 33, N435p 28 cQ M1. MATCH LINE B (SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS) \2 TrA04.. 4 4622,,o7w 28.00 WET LAND , • ti o � dyQ b; 66 E J�2', agreement •iU poweAine company -'--- MATCH LINE C (SEE SHEET .3 OF 4 SHEETS) DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS THUS: STREET 10.00 _..f 5.00 10.00 J 1 L- 5.00 t_ 10.00 r 10.00 REAR LINE I BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AND REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. /R Ec v JUN 2 3 2003 CITY OF DENOTES DELINEATED WET LANDS LAN© LAKE. EAST LINE OF TIE SE t/4 OF 7HE NW 114 OF SEC. 7. • DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT MARKED R.L.S. 17765 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. meas. DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE ALL MONUMENTS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTE, AND NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT, AND SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY RLS 17765. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE NORTH LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N87 °36'19 "E. m SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS • • • • CENTURY GANN NORTH 1ST A00. THRU 6TH ADD. \\ VSe ngnrl\ GregD \Prolects\0.gs- Greq- 2\0Dj100 PARCEL630- 001\UHDE- revisions- 12- 13- 02 \912001base.O.q 06/19/2003 091300 AM COT OUTLOT B GRAPHIC SCALE 0 00 NO ( IN FOCI ) 1 inch = 100 IL DEDICATED PARK /OPEN SPACE 20.082 AC. PARK - CONTIGUOUS UPLAND 4.723 AC. PARK - NON- CONTIGUOUS UPLAND 3.090 AC. TOTAL UPLAND 7.813 AC. CARL STREET / eiVED JUN 2 3 2003 C/7-yOF LINO L"4 Z"S O � o � r9 a r r / / r 40 A r r �� A _ � NZ r A / DJ REVISIONS PP1 fU� fU�vfU RECEIVED JUN 2 0 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES f•- • 40XS IFOLD DOOR w/ OPERA'? • GAEL_ OJ EX2 FX7 WWOW FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1 /S'= r -o• 36. 36. 36' 617 FIXED Wt'DOW 36 STEEL WAINSCOT (FOUR SDE BACK ELEVATION SCALE VS"= CONT. RIDGE lew 6x2 FDE wroow-r Q 36• VENTED 1 6X2 wwow 3SD. 36• STEAL WAN SCOT F3.3 3f�1 CONT. RDOE' ler RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE va•= r -o• 6X7 FD(H] WINDOW 38• VENTED vO z 1 6X2 F — WrDOW 38• STEEL WAtScDT f Je 3;££9 RECEIVED JUN 202003 CITY .OF LINO LAKES LEFT:. ELEVATION scALE V8 r-o• • -- 0 uJ 36" VENTED SOFFIT 64"-0" ..•••••■ ...■•••• ..•••••■•. 1) 12-n--o2 CENTURY FARI1 NORTH .FLOOR FLAN 1 -I\ Q?) n SCALE 3/!La= I'-0" I 44■••■• ve■•■•••■ U ( -n CONT. RIDGE VENT n I rt n U • RECEIVED JUN 2 0 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES 36" VENTED SOFFIT L (c ( c (c c (c ( c . N lr • • • AGENDA ITEM VI A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: July 9, 2003 TOPIC: Discussion: Banners and Temporary Signs BACKGROUND As discussed at the June meeting, many businesses use banners and other types of temporary signs and we have seen an increase in these signs of late in Lino Lakes. Staff is seeking direction from the P & Z on how to address the issue. The goal tonight is for the P & Z to recommend some specific requirements. Staff will take those recommendations and prepare an ordinance for a public hearing at the August meeting. (It will be an amendment of the sign ordinance.) The following matrix is presented to help with the discussion. Each row presents some options for an issue. Each "option" column is not intended to form a related set of requirements —we can mix up options from the different columns, or create new ones. ISSUE: OPTION 1: OPTION 2: OPTION 3: ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE 32 SQ. FT. MUST CONFORM TO, OR BE INCLUDED IN, EXISTING LIMITS FOR BUSINESS (OR INSTITUTIONAL) SIGNAGE NO LIMIT /RESTRICTI ON ALLOWABLE LOCATION ONLY ATTACHED TO BUILDING ONLY ATTACHED TO A "PERMANENT" STRUCTURE NO LIMIT / RESTRICTI ON ALLOWABLE TIME LIMIT NO LIMIT/RESTRICTI ON MUST MEET EXISTING LIMITS FOR PORTABLE SIGNS (SEE P. 15) 1 MONTH DEFINITION OF TEMPORARY SIGNAGE ANYTHING NOT "PERMANENTLY AFFIXED" TO THE BUILDING OR GROUND ANYTHING NOT QUALIFYING AS A WALL, GROUND, OR PYLON SIGN ALLOWABLE TEMPORARY SIGNAGE NO RESTRICTIONS • • AGENDA ITEM VI B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: July 9, 2003 TOPIC: Discussion: Temporary Fabric Structures BACKGROUND As discussed at the June meeting, a number of residents are constructing temporary fabric structures, primarily for storage of vehicles. This is a relatively new product that typically consists of aluminum poles with plastic fabric stretched over the poles. The P & Z indicated it wants to pursue adding language to the zoning ordinance to address this type of structure. The goal tonight is for the P & Z to recommend some specific requirements. Staff will take those recommendations and prepare an ordinance for a public hearing at the August meeting. (It will be an amendment of the zoning ordinance.) The following matrix is presented to help with the discussion. Each row presents some options for an issue. Each "option" column is not intended to form a related set of requirements —we can mix up options from the different columns, or create new ones. • • ISSUE OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 Allow them in what zones? All zones Rural zone only Properties of a particular size or zone only (similar to pole buildings) Class them as accessory structures or not? If yes, then all applicable existing regulations apply (setback, size, placement, etc.) If no, then must create a classification for them Specify them as temporary or permanent structures? Existing ordinance makes no distinction between permanent or temporary accessory structures Create a classification for "temporary structures" What setbacks to require? If classed as an accessory building, apply existing requirements If classed as a "temporary structures," create new requirements What yard placement to allow? If classed as an accessory building, existing zoning says it "cannot be closer to front lot line than principle structure or its attached garage" (p.3 -15) If classed as a temporary structure, create new requirements How many to allow? If classed as an accessory building, must conform to existing requirements If classed as a temporary structure, create new requirements What size to allow? If classed as an accessory building, must conform to existing requirements If classed as a temporary structure, create new requirements