Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/13/2003 P&Z Packet• • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, August 13, 2003 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 9, 2003 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. George & Lynn Fernstrom, 6340 Red Maple Lane, Variance, Tanda Gretz B. PUBLIC HEARING, Bruggeman Properties, SE corner of Birch St. and Hodgson Rd., Rezone, Preliminary Plat /Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Jeff Smyser C. PUBLIC HEARING, Roger Hokanson, NE corner of Lake Dr. and Aqua Ln., Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Jeff Smyser D. PUBLIC HEARING, Glenn Rehbein, Marshan Lake Industrial Park (formerly known as Lakes Business Park), NE of Blue Heron Elementary School (West of Lake Drive and East of I -35W), Preliminary Plat, Michael Grochala E. PUBLIC HEARING, Fogerty Investments, Lino Lakes Sportatorium, West of 35E and North of Cedar St., Conditional Use Permit, MUSA Allocation, Michael Grochala F. PUBLIC HEARING, North Suburban Development, Crystal Cove, SW corner of Lake Dr. and 79th St., Rezone, Preliminary Plat, Variances, Jeff Smyser G. PUBLIC HEARING, JADT Development Inc., East of Lake Dr. and South of Apollo Drive, Conditional Use Permit, Michael Grochala H. PUBLIC HEARING, Woodstone Builders Inc., Apollo Center, SE corner of Apollo Dr. and Lilac St., Conditional Use Permit, Michael Grochala VI. DICUSSION ITEMS A. None VII. ADJOURN • • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT . MEMBERS ABSENT . STAFF PRESENT July 9, 2003 6:41 P.M._..; 11:10 P.M. Corson (arrived at 7:01 p.m.), Ryden, Lane, Rafferty, and Tralle. Lyden and Schaps. Jeff Smyser; Michael Grochala; and James Studenski I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Vice Chair Rafferty called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:41 p.m., June 9, 2003. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mr. Smyser moved Agenda Item 5A down to another location on the agenda. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 11, 2003 Mr. Tralle made a MOTION approve the June 11, 2003 Minutes and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 3 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Vice Chair Rafferty declared open mike open at 6:43 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:44 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 3 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS B. PUBLIC HEARING, K -G Development, Ravens Hollow, East of Hodgson Rd and South of Fox Trace, Preliminary Plat & Rezone Vice Chair Rafferty opened the Public Hearing at 6:45 p.m. Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 2 Staff reviewed their July 9, 2003 report and recommended approval of the project with the conditions as noted in their report and adding the following two conditions: 11. Shall not final plat until 2004 to be consistent with the growth management policy restriction on annual MUSA allocation. 12. Landscaping shall be added on Lot 1, Block 3 to create a buffer between the home and Hodgson Rd. Mr. Corson arrived at 7:01 p.m. Vice Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Rocky Goertz, K -G Development, stated he agreed with the 12 conditions as summarized by staff. He noted on the utility easement they would add language into the conditions or add it into the final plat that the garage would be on the north end on Lot 1, Block 1. He stated on Lot 1, Block 3, they would add landscaping and/or berming. Vice Chair Rafferty inquired about recreational vehicles on the property. Mr. Goertz replied they would only be allowed on the property for 24 hours, this included RV's, campers, and boats. He noted all homeowners would be subject to the covenants. Ms. Lane asked if the homes would have basements. Mr. Goertz replied all homes, including the townhomes, would have basements. Mr. Tralle inquired about the aesthetics of the homes. Mr. Goertz replied the townhomes would look similar, but the single - family homes would be unique. Vice Chair Rafferty noted they were looking for something different in this development. Mr. Goertz replied there would three or four different styles, with one or two of them being better sellers. Mr. Tralle expressed concern about the homes all being the same colors. Mr. Goertz replied they would be different colors. Vice Chair Rafferty asked for public comments. Wayne Lasky, 6200 Linda Lane, stated he was hoping this area would remain single - family homes and was against the townhomes because he believed they would lead to lesser property values, and he did not believe the property was large enough for townhomes. He expressed concern about the value of his property if the townhomes were put in. Homeowner, 6224 Linda Lane, agreed with Mr. Lasky and stated he would like to see single - family homes in this development. He also expressed concern about the value of this property going down with townhomes being in this development. He stated he bought into the neighborhood thinking it would be single - family homes. Becki McDonald, 6212 Linda Lane, agreed with the previous comments. She stated she had been in a detached townhome development previously and believed they presented the feeling of row houses. She stated she had moved into this area because of the larger lots and the rural feel. She asked the construction traffic not go through the Fox Trace • • • Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 3 • development. Mr. Goertz replied the construction traffic would not go through that • development. Ms. McDonald expressed concern regarding access off of Hodgson Road. She expressed concern about the safety of the children in the area and an additional increase in traffic. She expressed concern that there was no park in the area where children did not have to cross a busy road. Vice Chair Rafferty stated there had been many neighborhood meetings and he believed the park issue was addressed. Mr. Goertz replied there was a designated park 300 feet to the east, but the Park Board did not have the money to develop that park. He stated he would follow up with the Park Department to see if funds could be set aside for a park. Amy Medley, 6201 Linda Lane, expressed concern about the traffic and the townhome development. Kevin McLaughlin, 322 Linda Court, expressed concern about decreasing property values and agreed with the other comments made. He stated he did not want to see lower value properties in the development. He thanked Mr. Goertz for creating a buffer between their development and the proposed townhomes. Mary Altstatt, 6134 Ware Road, expressed concern about another access on Ware Road and her not being able to get out of their driveway. She stated it was impossible to get out of her driveway as it was. Jim Davis, 6149 Ware Road, stated he did not want the townhomes on the south end of the project and indicated he wanted to see it remain single - family homes. He expressed concern about his property value. He expressed concern about basements being put in also because of the wetness of the land. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Corson asked why where there multi - family zones in the City. Mr. Smyser replied there were a number of factors that was considered when the City is planned, including Met Council requirements. Mr. Goertz stated he did not believe these were substandard homes and they would be sold for $300,000.00 plus. He noted this would not be Section 8 housing. He indicated he had held one neighborhood meeting and two public hearings for neighborhood input. He stated he did not believe the resale value of the existing homes would be affected by this development. He noted the covenants put on this development would regulate what was put on the lots, which would benefit the Fox Trace neighborhood also. 411 Ms. McDonald expressed concern on townhome developments on both sides of Fox Trace development. Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 4 Ms. Lane stated what this Board did was only a recommendation and the City Council had the final say. She encouraged the neighbors to attend the City Council if they had concerns about this development. Rod Morton, 360 Linda Circle, stated he had attended all of the neighborhood meetings. He noted Mr. Goertz had done an excellent job of communicating with them and the issue he believed was how it was going to be rezoned. He asked what would happen to the north of them and expressed concern that this would be a high or medium density area with the Fox Trace development, which was low density, sandwiched between. Mr. Smyser replied zoning to all single - family was not an option without amending the Comprehensive Plan and the City Council had stated they would not amend the Comprehensive Plan and it was the City Council's direction to the Board to work this out without amending the Comprehensive Plan. Vice Chair Rafferty requested a condition be added that the covenants had to be registered with Anoka County and if there was an association, the association had to also be registered with Anoka County by the developer at the time of the Final Plat. Mr. Goertz agreed to this condition. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to approve K -G Development, Ravens Hollow, East of Hodson Rd. and South of Fox Trace rezoning from R (Rural) to Residential Planned Unit Development and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the MUSA Allocation for the year 2004 and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to approve the Preliminary Plat/PUD Development Stage Plan subject to the thirteen (13) conditions and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. A. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 03-01 REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 -10 Staff reviewed their July 9, 2003 report and recommended adopting Resolution No. 03 -01 finding the modification of Development District No. 1 and Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -10 is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Tralle asked if the property across from the Village property was already in District No. 1. Ms. Divine replied it would not be included. Mr. Corson asked how many jobs would be created. Ms. Divine replied the business coming in would create approximately 100 jobs. Mr. Hyden asked where the other District was located. Ms. Divine replied 1 -9 was scattered around this area. • • • Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 5 • Ms. Divine stated the City Council had scheduled a public hearing on August 11 for • • consideration of this Resolution. Mr. Corson asked if the EDA felt comfortable with this Resolution. Ms. Divine replied they were. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to recommend approval of Resolution No. 03 -01 finding the modification of Development District No. 1 and Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -10 is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 4 -0. Vice Chair Rafferty recessed the meeting at 8:17 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:27 p.m. _ C. PUBLIC HEARING, Franke Feela, Inc., Haley Manor, NE portion of MarDon Acres, Rezone, Preliminary Plat & Comprehensive Plan Amendment Vice Chair Rafferty opened the Public Hearing at 8:27 p.m. Staff reviewed their July 9, 2003 report and recommended approval with the twelve (12) conditions as noted in their report. Mr. Rafferty expressed concern that this information had not being made available to the public in attendance tonight and he favored tabling this to the next meeting. Mr. Corson recommended the developer meet with the neighbors and have a neighborhood meeting with all of the residents if this was continued. Ms. Lane asked if the developer had met with the people who wanted to develop this property. Mr. Feela replied he had met with those people, but he had not met with the other residents in this area. An audience member stated she believed those in attendance tonight did not object to this development, but instead wanted to be included in the connection of sewer and water. Mr. Smyser suggested following the proper procedure and if the Board wished to continue the meeting, it could be done at the end of the public comments. Mr. Hyden asked if they needed the majority of the residents to approve. Mr. Smyser replied some of the residents were interested in having sewer and water service and in order for utilities to go in, somebody had to pay for them and the other issue was that they did not want to create isolated lots without being able to handle storm water management. He stated with a plat like this, there was a grading plan and if there was no grading plan, with area being extremely wet this was a very significant issue. He stated there was also a requirement that a creation of new sewered lots must be done with a plat and could not be done as a minor subdivision any longer. He stated in the past they had received petitions for sewer and water, but the City had decided not to do that now without platting the property. He noted this was a very unusual situation because it was creating new lots within an existing neighborhood. Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 6 Mr. Hyden asked if any of the people in the low - density unsewered had a say regarding this. Mr. Smyser replied the residents along Lois Lane would have to get together and form a plat if they wanted a sewer and water connection. He stated the owners of these four lots and their developer are the only ones who had put together all the pieces. He replied the other residents in the area did not have a plat and a plat was necessary for approval. Mr. Hyden asked about the Environmental Board's concern regarding setting precedence with MUSA. Mr. Smyser replied he understood the people in several unsewered areas did not want to be pressured to hook up. The Comprehensive Plan was written to protect these residents until the residents wanted to hook up. Mr. Tralle asked how many acres was MarDon Acres. Mr. Smyser replied it was 120 to 130 acres with Sherwood Green. Ms. Lane stated they were talking approximately four lots per acre and asked if this was within the medium density. Mr. Smyser replied it would result in 14 lots total and the whole area involved was 6 acres, which was 2.25 units per acre and this fit into the density requirement. Ms. Lane stated the residents could submit a plat, even if they had one -acre lots. Mr. Smyser replied that was correct, however, platting one acre was difficult. Mr. Grochala replied it was a City requirement that residents bring the sewer to their lot line for the next person and this was very expensive, so he did not believe the residents would want to extend the sewer without splitting their lot. Drinda Miller, 7839 Country Lane, stated she was angry because she expected to have a good discussion at this meeting and they could not have that discussion because there was no video tonight. Vice Chair Rafferty again apologized for the lack of video tonight. He stated this was very unusual. Greg Miller, 7839 Country Lane, stated there was a process to petition for sewer and water, but then they were told they could not have sewer and water without a platting by a developer. He asked why they had the petition process if it did no good. He expressed concern regarding access. He stated 77th Street has now been blocked with the development of Target. He stated this made Lois Lane the only access to Lake Drive and stated this was already a bad corner with respect to traffic. He asked if they were going to add houses, something be done with the access to the area. He asked for wording that Lois Lane would not be half closed during the construction of the homes so they could get into their property at all times. Tony Cavegn, 7870 Country Lane, inquired about the park dedication. Mr. Smyser summarized how the park dedication was determined. Mr. Cavegn noted they did not opt out of the utilities, just out of the development. He stated they were not selling their property. He noted he was not opposed to being platted, but his opposition was the numbers he was given was different once he informed the • • • • Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 7 developer he was not interested in selling his property and he was not happy with those numbers. He stated he would like to subdivide his land at some point. Mr. Grochala replied they have had discussions with Mr. Cavegn and some of this would not get done until they had approval, but since it was public sewer and water being run down the street, that those lines would need to be stubbed to his property. He stated the properties would share in the cost of running the sewer and water with a credit being given to the developer. He stated once Mr. Cavegn's property was subdivided and he hooked up, Mr. Cavegn would be charged a hook up charge. Tim Anderson, 547 Lois Lane, stated he was confused on this issue. He asked how they could make an exception to the rule for Mr. Cavigen while there were different rules for the remainder of the residents. He stated he had been told he needed to submit a petition to the City for hook up, which he did. He noted he had five people on his petition. He stated he was against this development because it would lower his property value. He asked when would the final numbers be established for Mr. Cavigen. Mr. Grochala replied Mr. Cavigen would still be responsible for platting and subdividing the property in the same manner that this request was being made. He indicated Mr. Cavigen's property would be assessed at the time the property was platted and subdivided. Vice Chair Rafferty noted they did not have all of the answers at this time and he did not believe it was appropriate they estimate costs. Mr. Anderson asked how did the cost get distributed fairly to everyone that benefited from the features. Mr. Grochala summarized how the City calculated the cost. Mr. Anderson stated he had met with the developer previously and he felt it would be to his benefit to assess his property at the time he chose to subdivide. He stated the majority of the residents west of the project were in favor of connecting to water and sewer. Mr. Grochala stated this petition did not have anything to do with this development and if the residents wanted to connect in the future, they would have a replat their land and request a Comprehensive Plan amendment. He stated this was not dictated by this development and it would be up to the City Council if they wanted to amend the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Anderson replied he believed it would be more efficient to have this done at one time, instead of twice. Vice Chair Rafferty stated the process they were doing tonight would have to be followed for all residents in the area interested in connecting to sewer and water. He asked how long would it take for the City to get their information forwarded to the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Smyser replied this process had already taken 3 -4 months and the Metropolitan Council had 120 days in which to respond once it was submitted. He noted there was a lot more to this than the residents wanting to simply connect to the sewer and water. Vice Chair Rafferty noted just because they recommended approval and the Council approved it, did not mean the Metropolitan Council would approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mr. Smyser replied that was correct. Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 8 Mr. Grochala replied the Metropolitan Council was not in favor of extending sewered and water into small areas. Mr. Anderson stated he had sewer and septic systems stubbed to their back, but they could not do anything because they did not have sewer and septic to their front and he believed they were stuck and he believed it was more efficient to have this done all at one time. Mr. Smyser replied the City would like to connect everything at one time, but it was not possible without it all being planned and platted together. Debbie Waldoch, 559 Lois Lane, stated she was the one that started the petition for the road. She indicated she had talked with Mr. Studenski in May who informed her that nothing had been done with Mr. Feela and now Mr. Studenski said they had been speaking with Mr. Feela for four months. She stated she had every intention of subdividing her lot. She stated she did not understand why they would tear up the road twice. She noted she would now have a road on both the front and back of her property. She asked why didn't the City put in the sewer and water and assess their property. She noted she had every intention of paying for the sewer and water. Vice Chair Rafferty stated if the developer had not come before the Board without the proper procedure, he would not get sewer and water. Ms. Waldoch stated she did not understand how a developer could come in and affect five other lots. Mr. Grochala stated they had been looking at this for four months and there had been several letters sent to the residents along Lois Lane, but they had not received an application for review by the developer until June 11. He indicated the City did not get involved in development, the City only looked at the proposals. He indicated they were not saying sewer and water could not be extended, but right now they had a developer who was willing to pay for sewer and water to their development, and if other residents wanted to have sewer and water they had to follow the proper procedures, just as this developer had followed the proper procedures. He stated the City could not, by Charter, run sewer and water on its own and it was not the City's responsibility to design a plat, which was what was required by the Ordinance. He stated the City was not going to spend money, without getting reimbursed for it. He indicated this was a developer - installed project, paid for by the developer. This was not a City installed project. Ms. Waldoch asked if the road would be torn up twice. Mr. Grochala replied this was a possibility. Vice Chair Rafferty stated the developer was accumulating costs that he has to pay, and if any of the lots to the west and south wanted to subdivide, it was in their best interest to follow the process set by the City to subdivide. He stated the developer was not guaranteed sewer and water. He indicated a petition was not the only process to get sewer and water, it was just one small part of the whole process. He indicated he did not believe this meeting was the proper forum for addressing their concerns. He noted there was a process to follow and it was not just the matter of extending the sewer. • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 9 Ms. Waldoch asked where the developer was going to put the runoff from this development so it did not affect her property. Mr. Smyser replied the developer had submitted a grading plan, which indicated where the water was being drained. He pointed out to Ms. Waldoch where the water was being proposed to run off to. A resident on Lot number 3 also expressed concern regarding water run off. She stated her lot had been flooded twice. Mr. Smyser replied one of the most important parts of a development plan was that there was a grading plan and they knew where the storm water was going to flow. He indicated to create new lots without doing this was irresponsible, particularly in Lino Lakes where water was a huge issue. He noted there were developments in the City that were suffering from prior mistakes and now they had really tightened down on the water issue. He indicated the City was extremely strict on storm water management now and platting was the way that they made sure this got done properly. Mr. Studenski stated nothing could leave the site in excess of what was the existing condition. He indicated this project met the requirements and there was nothing that would affect the adjoining properties. He stated the pond design was designed for a 100 - year flood event. Mr. Tralle stated he was not comfortable with going forward with this and tearing put the street twice. He indicated he was in favor of tabling this one -month to give the residents an opportunity for the adjoining residents to hire an engineer and start their process, but if the residents were not serious about this then he was in favor of this development. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to next month and was supported by Ms. Lane. Vice Chair Rafferty noted the applicant had not been given the opportunity to make comment and invited applicant to make comment. Frank Feela of Frank Feela, Inc., stated the septic systems in the area were failing and if they get through this process tonight, they still had to get Council's approval and Metropolitan Council's approval, which would bring this at least 60 days out. He stated holding them up another month was not right and the residents could still start the process in the next month. Mr. Grochala stated even if the sewer was extended, there would always be residents that wanted to connect and questioned where would they stop the process. He stated these processes were on two different time lines. Vice Chair Rafferty noted it was not fair to hold up the developer at this time. Mr. Tralle withdrew his MOTION and Ms. Lane withdrew her second. Vice Chair Rafferty asked if Mr. Feela agreed to meet all of the conditions. Mr. Feela replied he would meet all of the conditions as outlined by staff. Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 10 Kevin Murphy, 583 Lois Lane, clarified there was nothing wrong with his septic tank right now, but it was frozen solid last spring like everyone else. He stated by delaying this, it was not a hardship for him. Mr. Grochala stated he believed there were non - conforming and failing septic systems in this area. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 10:00 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing land use from Low Density Unsewered to Low Density Sewered Residential and obtain additional MUSA Reserve and Allocate MUSA and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the rezone from Rural to R -1 and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approved the Preliminary Plat with the twelve (12) conditions as noted in staff's report, and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4- 0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the variance for 132 feet lot depth, and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 4 -0. D. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Discount Tire, 633 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review and CUP Vice Chair Rafferty reopened the public hearing at 10:05 p.m. Staff reviewed their July 9, 2003 report and recommended approval of the proposed CUP with the nine conditions as noted in staff's report. He indicated he was adding a tenth condition that the trash enclosure be in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. He indicated staff was recommending approval of this development with the ten conditions. Mr. Tralle asked if the frontage road was private and if it was maintained by the development. Mr. Grochala replied it was a private road maintained by the development. Mr. Tralle inquired about the landscaping on the boulevard and who was responsible for it. Mr. Grochala replied each development was responsible for the boulevard landscaping, but the City would requirement coordination of the landscaping by the developments. Vice Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Bill Wendell, Discount Tire, 8000 West 78th Street, Edina, stated Lino Lakes was one of the first areas he drove and he noted there was a Target and Kohls in the City and they were associated with Target and Kohls in other states, and therefore he had an interest in • • Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 11 • developing in this area. He stated they were a retailer who only sold tires. He noted they • • believed in quality and all work was done inside. Vice Chair Rafferty asked how many employees they would have. Mr. Wendell replied there would be typically eight to ten employees at the store at any one time. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 10:26 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve the Site Plan Review and CUP with ten (10) conditions. The motion was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. E. Century Farm North, Final Plat Staff reviewed their July 9, 2003 report and recommended approval of the Final Plat subject to twenty - three (23) conditions as noted in the Resolution. Vice Chair Rafferty stated he wanted the overhang on the airplane hangers to be 36 inches. Mr. Uhde, applicant, replied the airport association had requested the overhangs be 24 -36 inches in the event the building inspectors required additional trusses be added. Mr. Smyser replied he would run this by the building inspectors for their opinion. Vice Chair Rafferty stated he wanted the overhang to be 36 inches on the hangers for consistency in the area. Mr. Tralle stated he believed the developer should pay the full park dedication fee. Mr. Grochala stated this would be an issue for the City Attorney to look at. Vice Chair Rafferty asked what did the developer want the park dedication figure to be. Mr. Uhde stated they were at the Park Board on Monday and they had been directed by the Board for the past year to dedicate land and not cash. He stated up until a few days ago, they had not decided which land to dedicate. He indicated they had not seen what the City was requiring until a couple of days ago. He noted the dedication should be a percentage, considering they were donating land. Vice Chair Rafferty indicated that $103,821 was a small part of this whole development, and he did not see why they could not come to an agreement on this and get it resolved. Mr. Uhde indicated if they could not come to an agreement with the City, by State Statute, they could escrow the money and take it to arbitration. He noted he did not believe this would go as far as a Court proceeding. Mr. Grochala indicated this was something they would need to work on with Mr. Uhde and the attorneys. Ms. Lane noted this was a matter of interpretation and it was up the attorneys to interpret it, and as long as the developer would be required to escrow the funds, she did not see this as an issue. Mr. Grochala indicated staff was comfortable with this arrangement. Planning & Zoning Board July 9, 2003 Page 12 Vice Chair Rafferty stated it was disappointing this has taken so long and if they could not have all of the answers in front of them, it should be not approved. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the Century Farm North Final Plat subject to the twenty -three (23) conditions as noted in the Resolution. and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Continued — Banners, as they relate to the City Sign Ordinance The Board requested this be postponed to next month's meeting. B. Continued — Fabric accessory structures, used as carports The Board requested this be postponed to next month's meeting. VII.. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 11:15 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. r • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 5A Tanda Gretz August 13, 2003 Variance from the 100' setback requirement for accessory buildings placed closer to the front lot line than a principle building (Rural zone) 6340 Red Maple Lane 3/5 vote George and Lynn Fernstrom own a home with an attached garage on property located at 6340 Red Maple Lane. Mr. Fernstrom would like to construct a second, detached garage, but such a proposed garage would have to be sited in front of the home due to placement of a septic system. The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance allows for such placement of accessory buildings in the Rural zone, but stipulates that they should be set back from the street right -of -way at least 100 feet (Section 3, subd. 4.D.1.c). The proposed garage could only accommodate a setback of 58 feet, however, due to the location of the septic system, and so the applicants are requesting a variance. This report is based on the following exhibits: 1.) General site location map. 2 -4. Elevation sketches of proposed garage 5 -6.) Septic location information 7.) Certifificate of Survey • • Planning & Zoning Board August 13, 2003 Fernstrom Variance ANALYSIS Land Use & Zoning The following chart describes the land use and zoning for the subject site, as well as surrounding properties. Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Low Density, Unsewered Residential Rural West LL °° North " 44 East LL °° South CC LL Setbacks The proposed garage will be sited closer to the street right -of -way than the home. Such placement of accessory buildings is allowed in the rural zone, provided a setback of at least 100 feet from the right -of -way can be achieved (Section 3, subd. 4.D.1.c). However, achieving a 100' setback for the proposed garage is not possible, due to placement of a septic system, which was installed in its present location about a year ago based on the recommendation of the septic system designer (Exhibits 5 & 6). The furthest the proposed garage could be sited would be 58' from the right -of -way. The existing garage is 79' from the right -of -way. Other possible locations for the garage — such as directly to the rear of the home - do not seem functionally practical, as there does not appear to be room between the edge of the septic system and the existing garage (approx. 8 -12') to accommodate a driveway, and such a driveway would end up crossing septic pipes. Alternatively, placing a garage on the opposite side of the property from the existing garage is also problematic due to the location of an existing pond and the necessity of constructing a second driveway. Accessory Building Requirements The subject lot is just under 1 -1/4 acres in size. As such, the property is allowed a total of one attached garage and one detached accessory structure, and an overall total of 1,200 square feet of accessory building space. The proposed garage would meet these requirements in terms of number of accessory buildings, as the applicant reports the existing attached garage is currently the only accessory building on the property. • In terms of square footage, the footprint of the proposed garage is 22' x 28' or a total of 616 square feet (the Certificate of Survey shows this as 20' x 28', which is incorrect). 2 • Planning & Zoning Board August 13, 2003 Fernstrom Variance This square footage, added to the existing 24' x 24' garage, totals 1,192 square feet. This is within the 1,200 sq.ft. maximum set by City ordinance. 616 = lower level of proposed garage (22' x 28') + 576 = existing garage (24' x 24') 1192 total square feet The proposed garage will have a 385 sq.ft. (22' x 17 -1/2') loft area, but City building inspectors report that such upper areas have not traditionally been counted when figuring accessory square footage totals. The garage meets other zoning requirements: it is 20 feet in height and thus meets height requirements, and although the siding is vertically oriented, the applicant reports that it is a non - metalic, lap siding and is thus not in violation of the prohibition against metal sheet/panel siding on accessory buildings for a property of this size. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR A VARIANCE Variances are driven by issues of hardship. In considering all requests for Variance, and in taking subsequent action, the City shall thus make a finding of fact on the following five issues of hardship: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. Comment: a second garage cannot be sited in any area near the existing garage without a variance, since the location of the septic system prevents its placement in a location that would meet ordinance requirements. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property and not created by the landowner. Comment: the septic system location poses a physical circumstance /situation that precludes siting the garage in a location that would meet ordinance requirements. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Comment: hardship is demonstrated by the location of the septic system, which precludes the homeowner from siting a second garage in reasonable location near the existing garage.. Planning & Zoning Board August 13, 2003 Fernstrom Variance 4. That granting the Variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Comment: since there is a demonstrable issue of hardship, there would not be any special privilege conferred. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Comment: variances can be granted, while at the same time upholding the spirit of the ordinance, when hardship can be demonstrated. CONCLUSION The issue of hardship drives all requests for variances. Hardship can be demonstrated in this instance by the location of the septic system. The septic mound precludes the proposed garage from being sited in an area that would satisfy ordinance requirements. In this way, hardship can be demonstrated and staff would recommend approval of the requested variance. OPTIONS 1.) Recommend approval of the proposed Variance. 2.) Recommend denial of the proposed Variance. 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1 4 RESHANAU EXHIBIT # 9 kW 4' 4 V470' A:, litit46* 4444 44.„AlSki■ 40, VIVO ztati MOW ettst 6,444096969944):4499.994.4 BIRCH STREET ta ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY BIRCH CT. 25 24 23 33 OLD 0 L z ;GE 13 afri 6 IMMENAT OTOTE efl 2 minim Lf 9s4-4Z 3 Nam 12 Dna= & sedit■ b(10111F PWrie U e k I:11J ), 7 40 25 y_621.41r EXHIBIT # 4- 0 1 1 "la EXHIBIT # 3 • EXHIBIT # 1/ SKETCH PLAN * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1 Please . as complete as possible. Inclu . e all of the items listed below where pplicab EXHIBIT # Scale / A4 30 orth Arrow C t CK LIST ** * * * * * * ** j.Drai ► ield Location L s . tion of All Wells and Depths Within 100 ft. of Tank and Drainfield D Setback from�QHW) a ion o res ater Line jg.Location of Wetland Areas • Structur • . on Side Lot Setback Road Setback Septic Tank Location i i • of i • T EXHIBIT # (d ELEVATED SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN *** * * * * * * *** * ** * * * * * * * *** * ** * * * * ** Location: Lynn Fernstrom, Lot 1, Block 3, Colonial Woods, City of Lino Lakes, Anoka Co. Percolation Average: 2 mpi Type of Residence: ® I 0 II 0 III 0 IV Number of Bedrooms: 4 Maximum GPD Water Usage: 600 Depth to Mottled Soil: 6 -20" Depth to Watertable: 2'+ Depth of Clean Sand Under Rock Bed: 24" Length of Basal Area: 50' Width Basal Area: 20' Total Square Feet of Treatment Area: 500 Length of Treatment Area: 50' Width of Treatment Area: 10' Desired Slope of Basal Area: 4:1 Type of Distribution: pressure Septic Tank Number & Size: 1250 gallon(check existing tank for size & integrity- replace if necessary) Lift Tank Size — (With Alarm): 1000 gallon Depth of Filter Rock Below Pipe: 9" Depth of Filter Rock Above Pipe: 2" Type of Cover Over Filter Rock: fabric Pump Size: 29gpm/15'hd. Pipe Size in Treatment Area: 1.5" Distance & Depth to All Wells Within 100 ft: 50'+ to deep well Distance to Lake or Stream: NA Use of a Garbage Disposal or Hot Tub: 0(Y) ® (N) Special Conditions: Keep the system in the area near B -5, B -6, and Designed by: Chris Zierke Signed: MPCA Certification # 00998 Lic.# 119 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY - ORLYN\ FERNSTROv I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY. PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF T STATE OF MINNESQ1 A. Randy L. Kurth, L.L.S. No. 20270 Russell J. Kurth. L.L.S. No. 16113 (MEASUREMENTS SHOWN IN FEET AND DECIMALS OF A FOOT) KUR TH SURVEYING, INC. 4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 PHONE (763) 788 -9769 FAX (763) 788 -7602 E —MAIL: KURTHSURVEYOAOL.COM c.) IN LOT A, 1;L: A . L15�-10' -' COQ tT Nsl \.OLA A, - rsA Ct- i 5 bcb�C/ t� 01-4 -Et c. `cam`. N,o ‘)'ELtKEFsTt D 1-AND5, Ohl -t-lL LoT NO V\`��IJLL CiVG�•,OAC {"',E� S. r-1 W 0 S 89 °18'18 "E 0 DATE 8 - ` b 3 • =IRON MONUMENT FOUND & 3 0 MARKED WITH LLS. 03527 ¢ALAr- hceJ5 PGC; VLA'T SCALE IN FEET 231.00 APPROX I NAT GRAVEL DRIV PVC PIPE ---o 680 SEPTIC AREA 1' D 2 0 E J �4/ O <��� OVER N�p pEC 0 / .r1C._i s PO \D O O 0) N w 0 0 0 (0 rn r 4Y a0 11 BITUMINOUS CURBS 111.00 N 89 °18'18 "W 1PS\N PNNo�E ° 00 D' 9 RED MAPLE LANE LOT 1, BLOC (0 K 3, COLONIAL WOODS, ANOKA COUNTY, MI \NESOTA • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V. B. Jeff Smyser August 13, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING: • Rezoning to LB and R -3 PUD • Preliminary Plat/PUD Development Plan • Conditional Use Permit for Daycare in LB zone Southeast Corner of Birch and Hodgson Bruggeman Properties The new Bruggeman proposal includes 152 townhomes and a 13,000 sf commercial building. To proposal would require the following approvals: 1. Rezoning of the site from R -1 and R -3 to R -3 Planned Unit Development and LB Limited Business 2. Preliminary Plat/PUD Development Plan 3. Conditional Use Permit for a commercial daycare facilities in the LB zone. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Zoning The site is within the existing MUSA and the Stage 1 growth area (pre - 2010). The majority of the site is guided for Medium Density Residential, at 3 -6 units per acre. The residential portion of the proposal complies with this density. The northwest corner of the site is guided for Commercial use. The following is a summary of the of the proposal: acres Gross Site Area 33.3 Birch & Hodgson ROW 3.3 Gross Area 30.0 Commercial 1.7 Residential 28.3 Wetlands 2.3 Upland Area 26.0 Total Units 152 Net Density 5.85 units per acre • • Bruggeman page 2 The table below identifies the existing land use, guided land use, and zoning for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site agriculture Medium Density Residential and Commercial R -1 and R -3 North commercial (across Birch St.) Commercial GB South residential Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 East residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 West residential (across Hodgson Rd.) Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 Growth Management Policy: The City's growth management policy includes several provisions. Provisions that are relevant to this individual project are addressed here. • Development within the existing MUSA is preferable to expanding the development area of the city by granting MUSA reserve acres. The Bruggeman site is within the existing MUSA. • Growth prior to year 2010 shall occur only within Stage 1 areas. The site is within a Stage 1 area. • Premature development, as defined in the subdivision ordinance, shall not be allowed. The proposal is consistent with the land use map in the comprehensive plan. Adequate sanitary sewer and water service are available to the site. Stormwater management design will be required to comply with federal, watershed district, and city design standards. The growth goals are discussed below. The road infrastructure is discussed under the preliminary plat heading: this project will contribute toward improving a deficient intersection at Birch and Hodgson. • The growth policy establishes annual limits on allocation of MUSA reserve and the number of new units that can be platted. • All projects greater than 50 units must have a phasing plan, and • The target is 50 units in each annual phase. The site is within the existing MUSA, so no MUSA reserve allocation is needed. The target for the number of new units to be platted is relevant. The policy target is to approve phasing plans that schedule the final platting of 147 lots /dwelling units per year. This is an annual average and it includes all residential growth, both within the existing MUSA and in areas that need MUSA reserve. At City Council discretion, the number of approved lots for a year may vary from the target of 147 by 20 %. However, the pre -2010 total would be reduced accordingly. The total is 1029 from years 2003 to 2009, inclusive: 7 x 147 = 1029. • • • Bruggeman page 3 The table below shows the proposed phasing plan for the Bruggeman project and its effect on the phasing plan inventory. LOTS /UNITS Development Name Prelim and Phases Plat Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platte, year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Stoneybrook 2nd Addn 103 51 52 Century Farm North 249 56 65 52 43 33 Ravens Hollow (proposed) 56 56 Haley Manor (proposed) 10 Crystal Cove (proposed) 3 3 Bruggeman (proposed) 152 50 54 48 minor subdivision Tots 1 total 51 172 175 100 43 33 remaining of 147 exceeds target of 147 by percent -25 -28 25 28 17% 19% 47 104 114 The proposed phasing plan for this project adheres almost exactly to the target of 50 units per phase. It is closer to the policy than the other two projects with phasing plans for 2003 and 2004. It would fall within the growth management goals if the City Council agrees to utilize the 20% flexibility. The first project to be approved in 2003 under the phasing plan policy, Century Farm North, exceeds the 50- per -phase goal by a significant amount in year 2004. That project had been undergoing review for over a year and was, in effect, caught between the old and new policies. There was no formal growth policy in place before, and now there is. At any rate, that project did fall within both the MUSA and 147 units restrictions, with the 20% flexibility. The Bruggeman project is the first project under the new growth policy that has multiple phases and meets the annual target for an individual project's phasing plan. That is, three 50 -unit phases over three years (plus two units = 152). It is within the existing MUSA and does not require infrastructure extension or MUSA reserve acres. • The City won't approve a preliminary plat if the first phase could not be final platted within one year. The Bruggeman project could final plat phase one this year, as shown in the table above. • Bruggeman page 4 Rezoning The zoning ordinance requires that, for a zoning amendment application: The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The project complies with in the comprehensive plan, as reflected by the land use map: the site is guided for Medium Density Residential and Commercial uses. In fact, the current zoning is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan and the proposed rezoning would correct the inconsistency. The project is consistent with the growth management policy if the 20% flexibility is considered. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The land use map of the comprehensive plan reflects the community's decisions on what type of development should occur in specific locations. The following passages from the comprehensive plan illustrate the supporting reasoning for the decisions that form the basis of the land use map: • The higher density residential areas have been located at the periphery of low density residential neighborhoods along higher functional classification streets in an effort to reduce traffic impacts on low density residential areas. • The higher density residential locations have been utilized as a land use transition between low density neighborhoods and more intense commercial uses, industrial uses, or higher functional classification streets. • The medium and high density residential land uses have been proposed in close proximity to the City's commercial locations as a means of providing convenient access to commercial goods and services, nearby market support for the commercial businesses, and reduced traffic impacts between these land uses. The Comprehensive Plan stresses the integration of commercial and medium density residential land uses. • To reduce compatibility issues between medium and higher density residential and low density residential, the City will formulate performance standards that give attention to setbacks, density transitions, buffering and landscape requirements that will guide future medium and high density residential development. The City utilized these principles in creating the future land use map. The recent revisions to the zoning and subdivision ordinances established performance standards to address buffers and landscaping. Development that • • Bruggeman page 5 complies with the map and standards complies with the compatibility principles upon which the map and standards are based. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (in the zoning ordinance). The setback issue should be discussed further to determine if the PUD flexibility is justified. Other issues are satisfactory. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Both water and sanitary sewer service are available in Birch St. on the north side of the site. The systems have adequate capacity. Stormwater management must comply with the requirements of the City and the Rice Creek Watershed District. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. This report includes a full discussion of this under the "preliminary plat, streets" heading. The Birch/Hodgson intersection has been a problem for some time because of delays during peak periods. As part of the project approval, Bruggeman and the developer on the north side of Birch have agreed to finance improvements to the intersection, including turn lanes and traffic signals. Ware Rd. will be realigned on the south side of Birch St. as part of the proposed development project to create a four -way intersection. These two improvements to the present situation are benefits of the project. Preliminary Plat/PUD Development Plan Under the current zoning ordinance, a Planned Unit Development (PUD) can be approved as a conditional use permit in a residential zone. The application includes a request for a PUD in order to allow flexibility from certain requirements. The question for the City to answer is whether the project fulfills the purposes of a PUD. That is, what is gained by the proposed flexibility? As stated in the zoning ordinance: The purpose of this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for the grouping of lots or buildings for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development. This section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of lots, buildings and activities, which promote the goals outlined in the Comprehensive Plan or serve another public purpose. It is further intended that planned • Bruggeman page 6 unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance of parking, open space and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage: 1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. • 6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations. • In addition, an urban residential PUD must have a minimum of 50% open space. The creation or preservation of open space is one justification for granting PUD flexibility. Lots: The following table lists the lot requirements in the LB and R -3 zones and information on the proposed project. LB proposed LB site R -3 proposed R -3 PUD lot area 15,000 sf 1.7 ac. base lot area 24,000 sf (8- units) 49,534 to 25,382 (3- & 4- units) 25,367 to 14,400 lot width 100' 247' base lot 100' 110' smallest (Block 16) unit lot 24' 32' smallest (interior units) setbacks local street 30 30' 25' collector /arterial 40 40'+ 40' 40'+ side 30' 10' rear 60' 30' impervious max. 65% 60% 65% total resid. area 42% • • Bruggeman page 7 The base lots are the individual blocks on the plat. The minimum base lot area of 24,000 does not take into account the variety of townhome structures that may include anywhere from three to eight or even twelve units. The area for each block was provided. The average for all 27 blocks is just over 24,000 sf per block. This seems a reasonable means of fulfilling the requirement. Setbacks: The plan meets the standard 40' setbacks from Hodgson Rd. (minor arterial), Birch St. (major collector), and Ware Rd. (minor collector). The plan proposes 25' setbacks from internal, local streets, rather than the standard 30'. The applicant promotes the following reasons in support of the reduced setbacks: • The central, private recreational open space is a response to recommendations by the P & Z and the City Council. Smaller building setbacks allow for a larger central open area. • Smaller setbacks allow for greater separation from adjacent properties on the southern border of the site. • Smaller setbacks allow for shorter driveways. With multiple driveways along the street (some of which are shared and are 40' wide), the decrease in length has a marked, positive visual effect. This also creates less impervious driveway pavement. In considering these reasons, full 30' setbacks would compress the central area by 10 feet on each side, a reduction of 20' in width, and five feet from the south. The area on the southern border of the site would be reduced by five feet. In both areas, the proposed ponds would need to be reconfigured slightly. On several buildings, patios built on the building ends would lie within the 25' setback. Decks or balconies can be 20' from the right of way, and slab patios are not subject even to that since they are not raised. As to the small privacy fence typically constructed between such patios, fence height limitations in the zoning ordinance are aimed at single family lots and don't translate well to townhome arrangements whose units do not front on streets. There is no inherent danger with the proposed fence and patio arrangement, though increasing the distance between patio and street would be desirable. Staff recognizes the direct trade off between setbacks and the open areas. The site does not include significant natural resource features to be saved by the additional open space, e.g., oak stands or wetlands. The question is whether or not the larger open areas justify the reduced setbacks. It is difficult to give a clear affirmative answer. Eliminating buildings likely is the best solution. Building Design: Residential: The design of the townhomes typically is reviewed as part of the site and building plan, which is an administrative review. Because the structures themselves may be of interest as part of the PUD design, the information is presented here. • • • Bruggeman page 8 The front facades include vinyl siding and stone veneer with vinyl shakes on gable ends. The sides and rears have no stone, and the sides have only vinyl siding. The zoning ordinance requires 25% of the combined area of all facades of a structure to be brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone. No single building facade shall have more than 75% of one type of exterior finish, except for brick, stucco, or stone. The structures do not meet these requirements. Townhomes without basements must have garages of 540 sf. The floor plans indicate that the garages do not meet this requirement. As with all townhome developments, a homeowners' association will be needed. By laws must be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to final plat consideration. Commercial: The commercial building exterior includes a stone base, painted "hardi- plank" lap siding, vinyl shakes on the gable ends, and prehung vinyl windows. Decorative painted wood columns and a small trellis along the roof line add some detail. The materials generally match those proposed for the residential structures. A painted wood sign band should be changed to something more attractive: perhaps stucco. A signage plan must be worked out, similar to the signage plan for the development across the street. Shoreland: The western portion of the site is within 1000' of the ordinary high water level of Baldwin Lake, which puts it in the shoreland overlay. The issue here is impervious surface. For commercial development in a shoreland, the impervious maximum is 60 %. The commercial area is 59% impervious. The residential maximum is 35 %, and the residential area within the shoreland is 30 %. Streets: One important criteria for new development is whether or not the project is premature due to inadequate transportation infrastructure. If the infrastructure is inadequate, it must be improved to ensure it can accommodate the new development. As explained here, major improvements to the surrounding roadways are necessary to accommodate the project. These improvements would occur with the project. The improvements would serve to correct an undesirable pre- existing situation as well. Site Access Points: The plan includes three accesses to surrounding roadways: • A full access to Hodgson Rd. is located on the southern portion of the site, just north of the wetland and proposed pond. • A right -in, right -out access to Birch St. will be created on the north side of the project site. This access is approximately half way between Hodgson and Ware Roads, minimizing conflict as much as possible. • A full access to Ware Rd. on the east side will align with Arrowhead Drive, creating a complete 4 -way intersection. This is a positive design element as it utilizes the location of an existing access point rather than creating another one. The spacing is good, approximately 1/4 mile from Birch St. • • • Bruggeman page 9 Internal Streets: Within the site, the streets create a loop with three access points to external roads. Overall, the internal circulation is good. The one concern is the offset between the commercial driveway and the loop street. However, this conflict point is about 150' from Birch St. and the Birch St. access is right - in/out only. The commercial driveway utilizes the narrowest part of the wetland to minimize impacts on the wetland. The offset is not a desirable situation, but it may be the best possible given the site constraints. Ware Road Realignment: At the northeast corner of the site, Ware Rd. will be realigned to create a four -way intersection: Ware Rd. coming up from the south will align with the new Ware Rd. on the north side of Birch St. in the Sprit Hills development. Birch/Hodgson Intersection: The Birch/Hodgson intersection has been a problem for some time because of delays during peak periods. A traffic study was conducted in 2002 for the Sprit Hills commercial development. The study concluded that the southbound approach of Hodgson at Birch currently operates at an unacceptable level of service. It would continue to do so regardless of the Spirit Hills commercial development, and would get worse with the development. Traffic operations are not expected to improve until the intersection is reconstructed with turn lanes and a traffic signal, which would significantly improve the overall traffic flow in the area. The Bruggeman development would generate additional traffic. To gauge the effect, it should be compared to the existing and post -Sprit Hills peak hour movements for the intersection. The table below compares data from a preliminary analysis of the Bruggeman project by TKDA to data from the previous study. Turning Movement Volumes P.M. Peak Hour total pre- existing (URS study) total with Spirit Hills commercial (URS study) added by Bruggeman (TKDA study) south -bound Hodgson left turn onto east Birch 412 502 straight south on Hodgson 135 99 north -bound Hodgson 28 total right turn onto east Birch 228 223 straight north on Hodgson 348 383 west -bound on Birch turn right onto north Hodg. 356 335 21 turn left onto south Hodg. 150 191 25 • • Bruggeman page 10 The Anoka County Highway Dept. reviewed the Spirit Hills commercial project and the Bruggeman project in November and supported the signalization and turn lanes for the intersection. Anoka County subsequently provided a design for roadway improvements to accommodate both projects. The improvements will include: • traffic signals at Birch and Hodgson • Hodgson southbound through lane • left turn lane from southbound Hodgson to eastbound Birch • Hodgson northbound through lane • right turn lane from northbound Hodgson to eastbound Birch • right turn lane from westbound Birch to northbound Hodgson • left turn lane from westbound Birch to southbound Hodgson • right turn lane into the project from northbound Hodgson at the Hodgson access • left turn lane into the project from southbound Hodgson at the Hodgson access • right turn lane into the project from eastbound Birch at the Birch access (right -in- right -out only) • right turn lane from eastbound Birch to southbound Ware • left turn lane from eastbound Birch to northbound Ware • Birch eastbound through lane at Ware • right turn lane from westbound Birch to northbound Ware • left turn lane from westbound Birch to southbound Ware • Birch westbound through lane at Ware As part of the project approval, Bruggeman and the developer of Spirit Hills commercial will finance these improvements. A feasibility study, paid for by the two developers, is underway. The City Engineer is conducting discussions with the Anoka County Highway Dept. to determine the specific improvement details. Parking: For the commercial building, 65 parking stalls are required (1 per 200 sf). The plan provides 65 with the potential for 16 more. The residential requirement is 2.25 off street spaces per unit. These are provided in the garages and driveways. Guest parking would be accommodated in the private drives and streets. Utilities: Public water and sanitary sewer exist both in 79th St. and Lake Drive. The City Engineer review is attached. Lighting: Information on lighting fixtures for the commercial site have been supplied. It is not clear which fixtures are proposed. Staff will revisit this with the developer to ensure that only fixtures with a 90 degree cutoff angle are allowed. Stormwater Management and Wetlands: Several wetlands exist on the site. Mitigation must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District. The City Engineer review is attached. Park Dedication: The Park Board recommends cash park fees with credit given for the private park area. As noted in the attached memo from the Public Services Director, the Board recommends that "the proposed recreation area remain private with an • • Bruggeman page 11 undetermined percentage of credit given for development of the park area an trails to be determined by the City Council." According to the ordinance, park dedication would be calculated as follows: 152 units x $1665 = $253,080, less credit for the private park area The credit for the park area needs to be determined. Since the general public is not able to use the private area but the new residents could use the public parks, the City should not give 100% credit for the park area as if it were public parkland. The other question is the value of the land. The Century Farm North project developer is questioning the use of $28,000 per acre as credit for park land dedication. It may be appropriate to adjust the land value to be used in the calculation. At any rate, the Park Board left this question unanswered. Mr. DeGardner's memo notes that the Hodgson and Birch trails should be constructed with the road improvements. Since the developer will finance the road improvements, the trails will be responsible for the trails along with the roads. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The conditional use permit is for the commercial site only. Commercial daycare facilities are conditional uses in a Limited Business zoning district. There are standards that apply to every conditional use permit, and specific requirements for daycare facilities. General CUP Standards: The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds the following criteria have been met: a. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: 1) Land Use Plan. 2) Transportation Plan. 3) Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans. 4) Local Water Management Plan. 5) Capital Improvement Plan. 6) Policy Plan. 7) Natural Environment Plan. The comprehensive plan's future land use map guides the commercial site for commercial use. The road improvements will accommodate the larger development as well as the 13,000 sf commercial building. Sanitary sewer, water, and stormwater management will meet all requirements. The commercial development is consistent with commercial policies in the comprehensive plan. • • • Bruggeman page 12 b. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The commercial site fulfills the comprehensive plan's design to have the intersection become a commercial area and is compatible with the commercial development on the north side of Birch St. The commercial building provides commercial services to the existing and newly proposed residential development. c. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. The commercial site complies with zoning requirements. d. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City. As described in the analysis of roadways under the preliminary plat heading, above, the roadways will be improved in such a way that they will accommodate the proposed development and correct an existing undesirable situation. e. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. City water is available to the project.. f. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer system. City sanitary sewer service is available to the project. g. The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. The City will not be responsible for any premature capital improvements. h. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. No such uses will occur on the commercial site. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The site has been part of a farm for many years. No significant features are on the site. • • Bruggeman page 13 Specific conditions for commercial day care facilities: a. All requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health and Human Services, as may be amended, are satisfactorily met and the structure and operation is licensed accordingly. Commercial daycare facilities must acquire licensing. b. Screening is provided along all shared property lines. Such required fencing and screening shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. The landscaping plan should have additional screening. Staff will work with the developer to address this. c. Adequate off- street parking is provided in a location separated from any outdoor play area(s). The plan includes the required number of parking stalls. They are on the north side of the building and the play area is on the south side. d. Adequate off - street loading spaces in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 6 of this Ordinance. A separate loading area is not necessary for this building. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD Board comments from January review of the original project submittal are attached. Review of stormwater design is a vital aspect of development and is being handled by the City Engineer. The project no longer includes a motor fuel station. UNRESOLVED ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED FURTHER 1. The reduction in setbacks and garage size is not sufficiently justified to fulfill the purpose and intent of a PUD. In addition, a PUD requires 50% open space. 2. Exterior building materials: use of masonry and variety of materials on all sides. 3. Park dedication with credit for the private park area. The credit has yet to be determined. 4. A signage plan for the commercial site should be supplied. 5. Lighting fixtures on the commercial site must be 90 degree cutoff design. 6. Screening of the commercial site should be increased. OPTIONS 1. Approve rezoning of the residential area to R -3 Medium Density Residential, and the commercial site to LB Limited Business. 2. Approve the preliminary plat/PUD plan. • • Bruggeman page 14 3. Approve the conditional use permit. 4. Continue public hearing or close hearing and table the application, to allow for resolution of issues. RECOMMENDATION Option 4 This review is based on the following, mostly received 7/3/03: Preliminary plat, revision date 7/1/03 Proposed grading plan, revision date 7/1/03 Proposed utility plan, revision date 6/23/03 Yield plan, revision date 6/23/03 Landscaping plan, 6/24/03 Site plan, commercial lot, 6/9/03 Building elevations, 6/5/03, and floor plans, received 7/3/03 Photometric plan, 7/9/03 Lighting fixture fax, 7/30/03 TKDA * ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • • MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 fax www.tkda.com To: Jim Studenski, Lino Lakes Engineer Reference: Bruggeman Properties Development Copies To: Traffic Study From: Jeremy M. Gorden Date: 8 -07 -03 Comm. No. 12701 -002 Routing: This memo is in regards to how the proposed Bruggeman Properties development will affect the adjacent roadways including the planned roadway improvements to the intersection of Hodgson Road and Birch Street. It is my understanding that the proposed Bruggeman Properties development will be located in the southeast quadrant of the Hodgson Road/Birch Street intersection, with Hodgson Road serving as its western boundary, Birch Street serving as its northern boundary, and Ware Road as its eastern boundary. The development will consist of 158 town home units and a single building which will house a daycare center and will also have spaces available for both offices and retail locations. The development will have three access points. Two of the access points will allow all turning movements to occur, one abutting Hodgson Road and the other abutting Ware Road, and the remaining access point will have only right -in, right -out capabilities, located on Birch Street. Having referenced the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook for the proposed development land uses, this development will not generator the amount of traffic that will adversely affect the adjacent roadways. Hodgson Road/Birch Street Intersection The planned roadway improvement for the intersection will consist of adding an exclusive right turn lane on northbound Hodgson Road, and adding exclusive left turn lanes on both southbound Hodgson Road and westbound Birch Street. In the worst case situation, the proposed development would add 25 new southbound left turning vehicles and 21 new northbound right- turning vehicles on Hodgson Road during the PM peak hour. Birch Street/Right -In, Right -Out access to development The proposed development would add 54 vehicles turning into the development and add 26 vehicles turning out of the development during the PM peak hour. Hodgson Road/Full Access Point The proposed development would add 21 northbound right turning vehicles turning into the development from Hodgson Road, 35 westbound left turning vehicles, and 28 westbound right turning vehicles turning out of the development during the PM peak hour. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Memo Page 2 8 -07 -03 Bruggeman Properties • Ware Road/Full Access Point The proposed development would add 25 southbound right turning vehicles entering the development from Ware Road, and 2 eastbound left turning vehicles exiting from the development during the PM peak hour. It is my opinion that the proposed development will add traffic to the adjacent roadways, but the roadways will be able to handle the increase in traffic with little or no problems with the proposed improvements to Hodgson Road and Birch Street. • TKDA "'ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: Copies To: James Studenski, City Engineer From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: July 24, 2003 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Reference: Birch Street Commercial Site (Bruggeman Properties) City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Comm. No. 12701 -002 Routing: A preliminary Engineering Review for this site was provided in a Memorandum by Pat Windier of TKDA, dated February 4, 2003. This subsequent review is based upon the following: • Preliminary Plat (P1), Utility Plan (U1), Grading and Erosion Control Plan (G1), all developed by Metro Land Surveying and Engineering, dated June 9, 2003, and revised July 2, 2003. ',Overview The proposed Commercial Site project development generally consists of the construction of a combination of multi - family /residential units, and a day care /office /commercial building on over 33 acres of property. The project site is located between CSAH 49 and Ware Road, just south of Birch Street. The property is generally flat and undulating with combinations of pasture, woodland areas and wetlands, and is undeveloped. The Preliminary Plat divides the proposed development into three (3) phases. Phase I would consist of the day care and commercial construction on the northwest comer of the site, and several townhome units on the south end of the property. Phase I would include all proposed driveway access points, including Birch Street (CSAH 10), Hodgson Road (CSAH 49), and Ware Road. Phase II and Phase III would essentially complete the remaining townhome units on the remainder of the property. • General Comments 1. On all plans provided, the streets shown must be provided names /identifications. Some detailed review comments are difficult at this time, as specific locations are somewhat difficult to reference clearly. It is presumed that the proposed streets will be owned and operated by the City of Lino Lakes. 2. Minimum building setback requirements should be confirmed. 3. The proposed development provides for connections to CSAH 49 and CSAH 10, and will therefore require further review, input and approval by Anoka County. Any work within the right -of -way of these roadways will require a permit from Anoka County. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Birch Street Commercial Review Page 2 July 24, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • An initial review of the Preliminary Plat was conducted by the Anoka County Highway Depaitment in a letter dated November 20, 2002, (Jane Pemble, Traffic Engineer). The following key points were made in their initial review: • As a result of pending improvements to the intersection of CSAH 49 and CSAH 10, additional right -of -way will be needed by the County along the west and north sides of the proposed development. However, because an actual design had not yet been developed, the extent of right -of -way needed at the time was not known. In addition, trail easements along the County roadways may be required as well. • An EB right turn lane from CSAH 10 into the site is required. Also, the letter discussed various intersection and turn lane improvements needed at CSAH 10/Ware Road, CSAH 10 /CSAH 49, and CSAH 49 /Arrowhead. Intersection sight distance requirements must be maintained in accordance with County requirements. In particular, the Landscaping Plan must allow for proper sight visibilities. The above design issues are currently being reviewed and finalized further by the City of Lino Lakes and Anoka County. Specific designs, scheduling, and cost participations are being jointly discussed and resolved by the City and County. The Developer's Plans will ultimately need to be adjusted accordingly upon final resolution. 4. A detail sheet must be provided showing all applicable City of Lino Lakes standard details and standard plates. This would include water, sanitary sewer, erosion control, roadway, storm sewer, and outlet structure details. 5. As part of the construction, existing structures and facilities shall be removed in accordance with City requirements, including removal of all underground facilities (foundations, septic systems, etc.), and replaced with suitable fill material. Any existing wells shall also be capped in accordance with State of Minnesota requirements. 6. All construction activity shall be performed in accordance with the recommendations provided in the Geotechnical Report (Braun Intertec, July 18, 2002). Generally, the existing soils are fine grained and moisture sensitive, and may be of poor strength or difficult to compact if they become wet during construction. Therefore, some areas (particularly for street construction) may require additional subcutting and replacement with more suitable compactable fill. Recommendations for utility installation (including dewatering) should also be adhered to. In addition, groundwater levels may have an effect upon the holding capacity of the stormwater detention ponds, and should be considered accordingly. Birch Street Commercial Review Page 3 July 24, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • Preliminary Plat Standard drainage and utility easements (5- and 10 -foot widths) shall be provided along all property lines. Drainage and wetland easements shall also be provided to cover all wetland and ponding areas as proposed. All easements shall be platted (shown on the preliminary and final plats). Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan and Drainage Calculations 1. The proposed Plans will require the review and approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), and the Developer shall submit a permit application accordingly. A copy of the permit application (including a wetland delineation report and drainage calculations) must be provided to the City of Lino Lakes. Drainage calculations were provided in January 2003. However, revised drainage calculations with drainage maps must be provided. 2. According to the City's Comprehensive Drainage Plan, the site area falls into two sub - watershed areas, Rice Lake SW and Baldwin Lake East. The proposed ponding and discharge locations as shown on the Grading Plan generally appear to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, with the exception of Pond B on the northwest part of the site. Pond B is shown discharging north across Birch Street (to Rice Lake) whereas the Plan suggests that it should discharge west (across Hodgson Road) to Baldwin Lake. This issue should also be addressed with the Rice Creek Watershed District as part of their review. If stormwater drainage is intended to be carried north across Birch Street, accommodations for the drainage between Birch Street and Rice Lake must be reviewed further. 3. The Grading Plan (Sheet G1) must provide additional information prior to construction. Construction notes, typical of grading plans must be provided. These notes would include a legend, provisions for erosion and sedimentation control, provisions for private utilities, references to traffic control and safety requirements (MLJTCD), provisions for sweeping and dust control, working hours, and other pertinent information required for construction purposes. Some additional grading and drainage related comments for use in revising the Plans are as follows: • Any imported topsoil, fill material, or granular materials to be used as roadway or building pad fill must be approved by the City Engineer (material and source). • Any notes regarding clearing of trees should be revised to include language stating that clearing and grubbing shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of Mn/DOT 2101. • Notes regarding seeding, mulching and turf establishment should refer to the appropriate Mn/DOT Specification for turf establishment (2575) and for the seed mixture specified (3876), or City of Lino Lakes seed specifications as appropriate. Birch Street Commercial Review Page 4 July 24, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • • All grading shall be confined to the property. No additional runoff from the site shall enter upon neighboring properties. If grading requires any work into the adjoining property, the Contractor shall be responsible for attaining authorization as needed. 4. Proposed storm sewer outlet and inlet invert elevations, and drainage structure rim elevations must be shown on the Grading Plan at all locations. 5. Pond outlet details for each outlet area are needed, and can be provided on a Detail Sheet. This information is also needed to verify the pond information in the HydroCAD model. The City of Lino Lakes prefers reverse grade pond outlets over baffled weirs. Utility Plan The Utility Plan submitted at this time provides a general overall design for the utility system (water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). Much of the detailed information required for construction Plans has not yet been provided. However, the following general comments can be made regarding the Utility Plan at this time: 1. Profile sheets, construction notes, service locations, and other pertinent information typical of utility construction Plans shall be provided accordingly. All utility system materials and installation methods shall follow City of Lino Lakes engineering standards, and the requirements of the Standard Utilities Specifications of the City Engineers Association of Minnesota. These requirements must be specified on all Utility Plan sheets, along with additional construction notes that include the following: a legend, provisions for private utilities, references to City of Lino Lakes requirements for utility notifications and shut - downs, traffic control and safety requirements. 2. The proposed Utility Plan provides for work within the right -of -way or street itself for all three surrounding roadways (Birch Street, Hodgson Road, and Ware Road). The Plan must state the following: all work within the County right -of -way, including grading, utility, roadway, and restoration work shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of Anoka County. All bituminous shall be sawcut to full depth, and traffic control must be provided per the requirements of MUTCD and Anoka County. The City Utility and Street Superintendents must be notified at least 48 hours prior to any work. 3. The Developer shall provide permanent easements for all public utilities not located within the public right -of -way. At this time, it appears that sanitary sewer and water extensions from the main serving multiple units need to be covered by easements, including hydrants. 4. All utility installations shall be performed in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report (Braun Intertec, July 18, 2002). fib5. Information provided on the Plans for individual services shall be provided, including locations and sizes. Birch Street Commercial Review Page 5 July 24, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 6. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet. Watermain The following comments, specific to watermain are provided as follows: • 1. The site area is surrounded by existing watermain pipe as follows: 16 -inch (Birch Street), 12 -inch (Hodgson Road), and 8 -inch (Ware Road). The proposed Plan provides for the installation of 8 -inch main throughout the site, and connecting to all three of the above existing mains. The proposed Water Distribution Plan for the site is therefore acceptable. All proposed main sizes (8 -inch) and types (D.I.P. CL 52), shall be labeled on the Plan accordingly. Construction activity and restoration of property and roadways shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of Anoka County. 2. Watermain appurtenances must be specified as follows: Hydrants - Waterous Pacer WB -67; Valves - Mueller A2370 -20 or equal; Corp Stop - Mueller H- 15000; Curb Stop and Curb Box - Mueller 11- 15154 Mark 2 Oraseal and Mueller H -1300 w/Mpls. Top. DIP pipe shall be Class 52. 3. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Permit for watermain installation. 4. All watermain shall be tested, disinfected approved per the requirements of the City of Engineers Association of Minnesota Standard Specifications and Minnesota Department of Health prior to acceptance by the City. Sanitary Sewer The following comments, specific to watermain are provided as follows: 1. 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer is shown as extending into the site from two locations: From an existing manhole north of Birch Street on Ware Road (Spirit Hills), and from Ware Road near the south end of the property. 2. The majority of the site would be serviced from the Spirit Hills connection. Per the City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan, the Spirit Hills connection point was recommended to be extended westerly down Birch Road to Hodgson, and south on Hodgson Road to extend to a point located south of the proposed development to service properties along Hodgson Road and to the south in the future. Upon review, the sewer extension as proposed will accomplish the same purpose provided the following revisions are made: Birch Street Commercial Review Page 6 July 24, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • • • Extending the 8 -inch sewer the remaining distance to Hodgson Road at the southwest corner of the site. • Extending the sewer westerly from the front of the day care /office facility to Hodgson Road. This will allow properties along the west side of Hodgson Road to eventually connect to sanitary sewer. 3. The Developer shall be responsible for extension of sanitary sewer from Spirit Hills. The proposed extension will impact both City and County Roadways, and may require boring, jacking, or other means to limit impacts and disruptions. This issue should be investigated further and provided for on the Utility Plan accordingly. 4. The invert elevations provided on the sewer on the west side of the property appear to be incorrect (5 successive manholes have invert elevations of 887.8). 5. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed MPCA Sanitary Sewer Permit, including correspondence and approval of Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). 6. The Utility Plans shall include notes providing for erosion and sedimentation control. The Developer must provide a televised inspection of all sanitary sewer pipes upon completion of installation. Any required cleaning of sediment from the sewer pipes after construction shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 7. All sanitary sewers shall be tested and approved per the requirements of the City of Engineers Association of Minnesota Standard Specifications prior to acceptance by the City. Storm Sewer All storm sewer mainline pipes must be RC pipe. Backyard HDPE pipe leads will be allowed by the City Engineer. Wetland Delineation Report and Wetland Replacement Plan A Wetland Delineation Report must be prepared and provided with the permit application submittal to the Rice Creek Watershed District. Additional Comments 1. The lowest building opening must be a minimum of 1 -foot higher than the emergency overflow elevation. Basement floor elevations must be at least 4 -feet above the normal water elevation and 2 -feet above the design flood level. 2. Typical street sections (pavement section and design) must be provided. All street system components shall, as a minimum, meet Mn/DOT and City of Lino Lakes Engineering Standards. Birch Street Commercial Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • Page 7 July 24, 2003 Standard curb design D412 modified shall be provided as shown. B618 curb shall be provided at all radiuses less than 30 -feet, with curb transition from surmountable to non - surmountable per City of Lino Lakes standards. Additional subcuts, placement of suitable base material, and recommendations of the Braun Geotechnical Report must also be adhered to. 3. A Tree Preservation Plan shall be provided as required by the City. 4. 4- inches of topsoil on all boulevards shall be provided and seed or sod as approved by the City. 5. A certified as -built survey shall be provided by the Developer's Engineer upon completion of grading, that certifies that all grading complies with the Grading Plan. This certification shall be required prior to the issuance of any building permits. Lino Lakes Public Services Department 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 982 -2440 Fax (651) 982 -2439 www.ci.lino- lakes.mn.us August 5, 2003 TO: Jeff Smyser, City Planner FROM: Rick DeGardneir, Public Services Director SUBJECT: Park Board Review of Bruggeman Properties Preliminary Plat The Bruggeman Properties Preliminary Plat was discussed at the July 7, 2003 and August 4, 2003 Park Board Meetings. A motion was made by Mr. Bill Kusterman, "to recommend to the City Council that the proposed recreation area remain private with an undetermined percentage of credit given for development of the park area and trails to be determined by the City Council." Ms. Katie Boyle seconded the motion and the motion passed 3 -1 with Mr. Paul Montain voting nay. Subdivision VI of the current Park Dedication Ordinance states, "Where private open space for park and recreation purposes is provided in a proposed subdivision, such areas may be used for credit, at the discretion of the City Council, against the land for cash dedication requirement for park and recreation purposes, provided the City Council finds it is in the public interest to do so." There seems to be a consensus among the Park Board Members that some credit should be given to the developer for providing the private recreation area and concrete sidewalks in Phases 1 — 3. However, the proposed percentage varied from as much as 100 percent credit to as little as 40 percent credit. Since the purpose of the Park Dedication Fund is to provide recreational and leisure opportunities for residents of Lino Lakes, designating the recreation area as private made some Park Board Members uncomfortable with giving full credit. Future residents in the Bruggeman Properties Development could use the private recreation area as well as the City's parks and trail system. However, the rest of Lino Lakes' residents would not be afforded the opportunity to utilize the private park area. Assuming the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council are comfortable with the proposed sidewalks and trails, I suggest that the developer not be responsible for construction of the 8' wide bituminous trails along Hodgson Road and Birch Street. It would make more sense to construct the trails during the road improvement process of Hodgson Road and Birch Street. A portion of the cash dedication for this development could be designated for the trails along Hodgson Road and Birch Street (approximately $35,000). I have attached a copy of the cost estimate for the proposed recreation area improvements received from Bruggeman Properties dated July 25, 2003. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 651 982 -2444. RD: sw sw /Rick/Park Board Review of Bruggeman Properties Preliminary Plat — Smyser Memo.doc • Estimate 5`:trail-!i T4taF Tr iffy Qty Unit Cost Total Description 1.2 Acs $45,000 $54,000 1.2 Acs 1,000 1,200 1 LS 2,000 2,000 1 LS 30,000 30,000 1 LS 10,000 10,000 1 LS 1,500 1,500 1 LS 1,500 1,500 1.1 Acs 5,000 5,500 1.1 Acs 3,000 3,300 20 Ea 275 5,500 114,500 10,260 SF 1.90 19,494 7,029 SF 1.90 13,355 9,837 SF 2.75 27,052 10,494 SF 2.75 28,859 1,341 SF 2.75 3,688 92,447 206.947 152 Units 1,665 253,080 1.7 Acres 2,175 3,698 256,778 (206,947) 49,830 See attached Exhibit A See attached Exhibit A 9" certified, engineered wood fiber 5/8" drain aggregate w/ geotextile fabric See landscape plan See landscape plan Asphalt Asphalt Concrete Concrete Concrete ParkCredit072403 7/25/031:30 PM • • • Exhibit A Date: 7 -24 -03 Bruggeman Properties, LLC Lino Lakes The following structures will be purchased and installed by the developer. They will include impact attenuating certified engineered wood fiber and will meet all current ADA, ASTM, CPSC laws, regulations & standards respectively. Furnishings or equipment of equal quality may be substituted with approval of the City of Lino Lakes. Site Furnishings 1 Pilot Rock, maintenance free, vandal resistant, recycled plastic, 6' ADA picnic table 6 Pilot Rock, maintenance free, vandal resistant, recycled plastic, 4' bench, cedar color 2 Pilot Rock, maintenance free, vandal resistant, recycled plastic, pedestal mounted 55 gallon trash receptacle w/ secured dome lid, cedar color Plav Equipment 1 Kompan Elements spring rider toy 1 Burke single post, 2 bay swing, 2 strap seats, 2 toddler seats, non "S" hook system 1 Burke composite structure designed for 2 -12 yr olds including, at minimum, the following play events: 1 rocky mountain adventure climber 1 triple monster slide 2 handicap transfer stations 5 multi - branch tree climbers 1 triple rail slide 1 adventure climber (includes panel & sliding pole) 1 satellite climber 1 12' dual kid coaster — attached 1 loop rung ladder 1 ground level car panel 1 32" transition stair 1 overhead wheel deal 1 overhead roundabout 4 sky pods 2 fun phones Play Equipment Example rwiemo To Michael Greet gala From: Marty Asieson CC: Jeff Sf i fyser Date: February 3, 2003 Environmental Re: Envir oni rental Board Recommendations/January i iendations /Januai y 299, 2003 Ali uageman Pro per ties The Envir oni i ient}al Board Recommended i�iended on January 29, 2003 that the proposed B uggge 1 a -Pr opeI ties Development be denied, because: 1 The lack of input from Rice watershed and the Minnesota N '' il.: Creed �Jat "e=' District a +; ; Department of Natural Resources. • 2. The proposal to build a car wash and gas station in a Lake Protection Zone and an area with high sensitivity to around water pollution. The Environmental Board made the following additional recommendations should the proposal go forward for approval: 1. Follow Staff Recommendations in Environmental Board Meeting Report, 2. That the Developer would work with Staff on Landscaping Plan changes. The large NURP porn proposed in the NW corner should be entirely landscaped. The City native Gram and flower seed list should be used. 3. Grit and all filters should be part of the design. 40 4. The Developer should follow iia itinp guidelines in the new Draft Zoning Ordinance. 5. The surface water pan must be evaluated to determine environmental impacts. 6. That any proposed lighting canopy is designed with ret,e ed lights and with no fascia lighting. 7. That parking be reduced to City minimum standards. I lotion b Snyder, second b i Ur d h8w e. All approved. Living Waters Lutheran Church The Environmental Board Recommended on January 29, 2003 that the proposed Living Waters Lutheran Church Addition be approved with the following comments: 1. There are high - priority protection areas to the North of the existing path. This area should not be disturbed. 2. City native seed mix should be used in proposed pond and swale areas. The • landscape plan should include building foundation plants. 3. Proposed sod should have at least 4 inches of topsoil thoroughly incorporated into the ground. 8. Any new lighting should follow 1 h ilia guideilnes in the new Draft l y� t r Zoning Ordinance. 4. Sugar maples in the plan should, be changed to Red maple or Oaks. Motion to approve by Haiei , Second by Donlin. All approved. • • Memorandum To: Michael G rochal la uv. Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: 21412003 Re: Staff Report Recommendations /Bruggeman and Living Waters Luther Church/Environmental Board Meeting, January 29, 2003 Staff made the following Recommendations: can Development ent 3 shows the Lake Protection areas, Zone 1 and 2 Protection surface water flow patterns, and High Priority Protection areas. This e t r site is in a Lake Protection Zone. Existing agricultural drainage eels water for the most part to Baldwin Lake. A small area on the SE finer travels to Rice Lake. Surface water issues are the most important issues on this site. Water is ditched directly into Baldwin Lake. Surface water is proposed to be directed into a new NURP pond. Water from this NURP pond will be discharged to the existing ditch. Surface water information will have to be evaluated to determine impacts, if any, to Baldwin Lake. Given there is a gasoline service facility planned for the site, there should be some structural plan for containment. The Landscape Plan does not show landscaping for the proposed pond. The plan should show this pond area with City of Lino Lakes Native Pond and Drainage area seed mix. A suggestion should be made to obtain a landscape company experienced in this type of landscape establishment and maintenance. 1 'df iiidry 4, 2003 There is no plan for ground story plantings in the existing plan. If there is proposed sod for these areas, than these areas should be shown as irrigated. The plan should show intentions of ground story and cover for all landscaped areas including islands. All soils in these areas should be thoroughly tilled with at least an additional 4" of topsoil added before tilling. Norway maples and Amur maple should be substituted with a non-invasive species. White oaks in this area would be more appropriate than Lindens. Since there are a number of oaks proposed for removal from this site, oaks should be paced back in. Additional oaks should be required around the maintenance pond. There should be a tree inventory submitted that is in data base form and readable. It is difficult to tell from the plan how many oaks and what size oaks are proposed for removal. Several more oaks should be planted in the "S", and East Side of the Retail Building area of the landscape plan to screen housing to the East later. Oaks should be substituted for Laurel leaf willow on the East Side of the Retail Building. The Pre - settlement vegetation for this area is depicted on Exhibit 6. The lighting plan should be tow- impact, "no- spill ", downward focused, minimum lumen type of focus with any canopy enclosures unlit. The existing lighting descriptions do not meet this requirement. This plan needs revision. Surface Water Management is very important on this site. Existing and proposed water conveyance systems indicate a direct connection to Baldwin Lake by h developer ���.. by the ditch. Since this is in a lake protection area, the developer should show creativity in attenuating volume and quality issues. Post development should try to lower volumes, maintain required rates, and reducing nutrient loads. Pre and post - nutrient modeling should be demonstrated. Surface water direction on impervious areas should be directed to curb drops by the pond if this can be made to work. It appears that before ditching, water flowed to Rice Lake and had a bit more buffer before reaching the Lake. This might be an alternative. The Anoka County Sand Plane Ground Water Modal depicts this area as very sensitive to ground water pollution potential. (Exhibit 5). Any infiltration anticipated or planned should have at least the 3 -foot minimum recommended separation from the seasonally high water table. If the proposed pond is large enough to contain all surface water storm events for a 100-year flood, h Qn the environmental concerns become much less. 2 February 4, 2003 A Best Management plan should be required for development and post development agreement. This plan should address soil and tree protection during development, and site keeping after development. Site keeping after development should include parking area sweeping, litter pick -up, storage of any hazardous materials, turf and native -area maintenance plans, and pond maintenance. All topsoil on the site should remain on the site. Any intention a 1✓ a it ny ention to import Soils, must have the approval of the City, and be submitted to RC M for review of surface water infiltration rate changes Living Waters Lutheran Church: Since 1993 (the time The church was built), the Environmental Board has consistently asked new surface water management features to buffer watershed features. The Area to the North is designated as a High - Priority Protection Area in the Lino Lakes Handbook for Conservation Design. Soils in this area are sandy, and pervious. If an infiltration train were designed into the site plan, there appears to be enough separation between the OHW and a designed rainpondlswail area. The rain pond area must be in an area where the Seasonally high water table is at least 3 feet from the bottom of the pond. Please refer to (Attachment 8). The seasonally high ground -water level should be verified. Peak flow analysis indicates a .23 cfs increase in water volume flow in a two year event, a .32 cfs increase in water volume flow in a 10 year event, and a .30 increase in water volume flow for a 100 year event for the entire site. The basin should be designed if possible to accommodate this extra surface water volume, if not for the entire site. Additional pondii g is shown in the turf areas. No surface -water analysis information is available at this time. The soil areas around proposed remaining pervious areas should be protected from compaction during construction. A buffer of native plants incorporated into edges and a surface - water- treatment -train should be planted. Ground story materials should be native in the poi riding and drainage areas. All proposed sod areas should have at least 4 inches of topsoil tilled thoroughly into the subsoil as deep as possible. A detailed landscape plan should indicate more foundation plants. A few oak trees should be planted into the surface water treatment areas. Suggest changing the Sugar maples to a variety of Red maple or oak. Although there is no proposed lighting for the added space on the church, the possibility d i light building exists that there may be a need to �ry� iE the bi.ii�uing In the future. If this should happen, than the lighting should be down ward focused, no -spill type lighting. • ° n no o i �cr��no BN ■ �Eia rr 1i - a GOMA 1111 Ell ,ppeyy �'''''' -11 ill � 0 '' 4P R E Oj, BAL'•OIlIM LANf� i�A� ©I o©oomicoo� kano®� ka mi biler,q9.253cra V* MS ■o° O,oON Li� 0 ©j minim viiu. mmoswErik ill ©LINIM m a ,© • • PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Commercial Low Density Sewered Residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Medium Density Sewered Residential 1:' rot te AEC Vj 1 t.- L r-A Lam. COON BALDWIN £Dw0o4 9R/f.1.4.1, "PR123Ano LAWS BIRCH STREET N69'09'00'E 1019.44 CnhofCUSIWG- CLU[U1W3,.CI,U L.CSla.oS130-a]ISpl0.l 4 -1-n rq 1../1061 NAME M COT 1177.60 S89'10'44'W 1 5 0 50 75 000 ISO E00 SCALE IN 0 Mai Auto t Oat. IRA Ivoilmearr 1 1 EDr. _®IN ®N1 ..... =tF'elA 51�175=7��0 ®1113111118® 7tLENIMMIC©A �r'711f=FJID 111111■=♦EMIIf/D0 5�1 • 1P^-_t -_t L- NIM111117ThE:Mr! 10=11107. NICTUL7A mincemarammurAru •1•01W7IllIt••=GItA • =.11•1111, ENIIMM-77111111•171•111L,1r,1 . =_yn w■r!nE =SSA �� A RTa�'�17�i•s1*!0 ���•1 51 • f.m=! =11.:;17 :..11111111111111111,11111117 Man sep FEET 0 a 0 d 5 a S 2 Z Y P1 awlapa4 2I$xuc ICSAau uas a P? itCtaV.p.- 4.rISlatC&nu._no.00 Ct- yppatL�rotwuer Mteflb([t.Hp 13/11/2003 I*001 DAYCARE /OFFICE/RETAIL 13.000 If 160 200 FEET Li r F 1 m s c D G1 4 MANNA 9R/9 AMERMSA.0 lEMS Cv.J.0tfOVO-GOIR\150005,OV0 L..O54.gM50000*.'slo.- ..1 e.1 0{10,100, '21.0. n 012 O 90 90 120 SCALE 100 040 [N FEET $5§ A • C0.41.161. 4TLAVAM+' PROPERKSANO uas BIRCH STREET 0,reoctf 4W4 (4 L1170p17K1.9 LAKE7w.0t1T0- 01 -PI:A7 6.0.06.0 O6,f1R40 WC"! 4. CDT I 1111111111111H II B DAYCARE /OFFICE/RETAIL 13,000 Sr 2 0 3 r- 2 t A 3 PHASE 1 PHASE 1 AREA - 7114 ERCIN. -0(0.040 NET BRRDA6LE PROP. 0EAELEME447 - PNASE 1 P004. OEtdTT - PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 2 AREA 631,104 SF. 74.074 4. 71,015 SF. 406.014 F. SCALE 00 15 109 160 too 15 14.469 AC 1.700 AC L636 AC 11.157 AC 61UNS 947 ANTS /ACRE 450379 SF. 10.316 AC. - WETLAND 3.164 52. .073 AC. NET Bu4DA01E 447,513 Sr. 10.273 AC PROP. DEtE7.OPNENT - PHASE 2 59 4403 PROP. OE0047 - PHASE 7 974 1.9475 /4400 PHASE 3 PHASE 3 AREA - 0(14.710 NET BOEOABIE PROP. DE MOMENT - PHASE 3 PROP. OENIM - PHASE 3 TOTAL 401E TOTAL AREA - CONIfRCIAL 9E1UN0 - 44050.040 4 1711044 6.0.74 NET WADABLE ALLOWABLE OENsor ALLOWABLE MIS P0040 m 0Et0D194ENT PROPOSED 64007 0 cc w 723 744 A. 2.077 59 197.673 Sr. 4419.063 5<. 74.074 4. 101.175 SC 744.333 Sr. 1.130,361 ST. 2.436 AC .590 AC 4.530 AC 340400 7.05 UIOR/ACRE 33.724 AC. 1.790 AC 3.323 AC 3-113 AC 35.947 AC 5 ANTS /ACRE 055 011115 154 LRAM 555 0x15 /A0E 19 BLOCK NUMBER 9 LOT NUMBS FEET F. a 0 0 1 PH1 aver: omaut or nor 4 gti`K+• /en ran tut won more / / / /// swat . eed / emit 04,M f WOO. lip[ II= mow Pe. t wets. caw sue w wutno,� F1OrR57e1 k ormolus mm pi ,, *r neat NOTES: • Base information provided by Eruggerran Companies • Contractor snob locate and verify all uti6Uea that may 505c1 Ihla week Gopher State One Cad. 454.0002 • Contractor snob coordinate his work with others ct site and complete his work per owners schedule_ • Rough gracing and finish grades to os completed by grading contractor. landscape contractor shed verify grades prior to commencing work • Contractor shall notify owner one week prior to anticipated completion and guarantee inspection.. • Plant materiels wool be guaranteed one (1) full year upon total ccmplelian and acceptance by owner. One tiara replacement at appropriate season er upon request of owner. • Flt plant molerid shag comply with In. cement edition of the 'Fmerkan Standard Fm Miner), Stook'. Trees shall be from certified mews/ stock as defined ono controlled by Minnesota Statutes sections 15.44 through 18.61, 'The Peet Act'. • All mass snub plantings shot be caged from latm areas with commercial groat W. ( Edging. Spite. shall be placed 4 per 20' section of edging. • NI mews to be seeded with the ornamental grass tittle Blue Stem snail be separated barn lawn meat ith o 'Carden Edo:. and wit • Incorporate Inporate erosi n control blanket. • All perenniat beds and sends beds net by the budding shed receive Y of Shredded Hardwood Mulch. • Trees not In rock beds. nor in mow beds, soon receive rings of mulch 4• deep. Mulch snob not be plots directly against the trunk • f the tree. • Ad bed. and maintenance stripe newt to the 'wreathe. shoe use 1.51 51. Cloud Granite over pay, 3' depth. • Wrap au fad planted, light colored. thin- barked deciduous trees with heavy relent waterproof crepe tree wrap. Apply prior to Hov. 30 and remove no later than Aprl 30. • Ail moos not being seeded with Prone or Meadow Seed mix. will be turf. • All disturbed areas thot ore indcoted on Chi Grading Plan not In sod. snob be seeded with mixture indicated an plan. Creston Mortal Mil be used where slopes me greater than 205 • 00 automatic enaerground ;Moulton system shall be oesigned and nstotled by owner opprowa contractor. Coordinate weave locations and ;installations es dkected by owner. • Lanascopng plan pr spaced by Midwest tondscaping 1 Project Con f 1 I 0 Owrntory Tree. 2.5- bb. xaa ff... rap. Pydu bast... P upas trwnuied.s O dense Wage, Oucsys pdusb• lea tfp. 0.er5 c' b auk ... s dentate tin*. yY a... Prue mum Pious Iris Pnua Pnn endwesa 1F,dentery Tree 1.71- 0.b. Mom Spa, Am.letchler Spa, Ater ghwe aeloeg,n We -200 Nuns Q 2' -3' ht. Ja043.r P Junipen. ionrenlali. 'Hughes' Junipervf ha 0.'w.Prn\Fa'^+.1r4\r5tcy -u,.b 1505..r tnf4 ; sr-a ,00 o.r 50/0/20:1 15.51:% w Cei n r - 3' hl Dedws G 00.5. Poe 0nnd0 10aNy Cempc01' 0 0,000chwr *M. 'Repent. 0,0510 mewrotarpo •.p. ashes avulerw p Lanka. 0005.0. Tre..• * Mound knee Ike 'Cra -law' s_• s.n. 5ty'n 0a '005006' St4✓rvsmm bitches $eeay Ganged' O Ornamented Cress.. • Hen000001 s app. di P•rennialr. Mined O 50 76 1' SCALE IN I i 1 1 1 • nAY(`FRr /flf-Fl f'C /DCTan 150 200 .8 I 1 FEET 1 0 0 0 Wet Meadow Seed mix Ian Penang Areal 0 Wet Meadow Seed mix for Penang Aron 10 0 L1 SITE STATISTICS TOTAL LOT AREA 14,074 SF. • 1.7 ACRES TOTAL GREEN AREA. 30,295 5F. • .70 ACRES • 40.4 % PROPOSED LOT ZONING - LIMITED BUSINESS TOTAL BLDG AREA. 13000 5F. SPACE' TO BE EITHER DAYCARE. OPFICE, OR RETAIL BUILDING SETBACK. 40'-0' PARKING sTBACY 15'-O• PARKING RES'D(SCENARIO I- OFFICE). 65 STALLS (1/200 5F) PARKINS RFS,7'D(SCENARIO 2- RETAIU. 65 STALLS (1/200 SF) PARKINS REO'D(SCENARIO 5-51500 5F DAYCARE, 7500 SF RETAIL/ OFFICE) 1 STALL PER 5 CHILDREN • 116 CNILDRENS • 23 STALLS 1 STALL PER STAPP • 7 STAFF • 7 STALLS RETAIL/OFFICE 7500/200. 37 STALLS TOTAL STALLS (SCENARIO 3) • 65 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED. 65 STALLS TOTAL PARKINS PROVIDED INC. PROOF OF PARKING. 81 STALLS NOTE IF SMALL RBSTALRA:T 6055 IN, THEN PARKIN& NOILP 5E A HIGHER DEMAND 7141S 51 STALLS WOULD BE APPROPRIATE 1 SITE PLAN 6 BUILDING SETBACK ONUMENT SIGN 191 111111MAhl DAYCARE /OFFICE /RETAI 13,000 SF CONCRETE/ WALK • • INF T PLAY ARE x FENCE f i • • • Dt ^FENCE BITUMItiOUS PATH • • • • • • • • • • • • • •11111•••••••••1111111111111111111•111111•1511111 TODD/PRESCHOOL PLAY AREA `FENCE iC • __ r 5 cc 0 30 60 120 ARCHITECT 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IRS PLAN AND SPECIFICATION NA55 PREPARED BY FE OR LOVER K1 INFECT 5PERV151G11 AND THAT 1 AN A 10.Y RESISTERS) ARGHRECT I THE LAYS OF 11E STATE OF HHIPS5OTA AS ROWED BY MY HAND AND SEAL. &PETER IALEER Ases2 SEAL REVISIONS Lino Lakes Development HODGSON RD. & BIRCH ST. LINO LAKES, MN SITE PLAN SITE STATISTICS DATE 06.04.03 SCALE 1••90' DRAM BY POO CNEG9:D BY PDO SP -1 02 -0 PAINTED WOOD FASCIA VINTL (FAUX - CEDAR) PAINTED WOOD VENT ►a'iiltIIu °n n nil n 11171111 _ '1111111 11` •lr1!11211111112111 t171111P -- rm irtuu.4.. ,I 1t11 III II! 11w ui lil ilil lu71H1, BPIIJ l/ ■ 1181111 - 11111111. .111111 111 111 1111111t11111111111u 1111111:111111111111 .111111111111111111 1111111 1 I 1 1/7 111i i '11111111121111111111211111111. 1 .,•11111(11{' Mpl t ptl III � n 1� 111111111:ri 111111 lt. 11 i I41111n1111l. 111111111111 1 _1 1.11111F11111111111/ 111111/B x•11 Pi 111 /IIIIIII111. numml.yul:.,tu .11lun7nu1nn11nn11n _.l.p__L14ISnanu7l uw1n111nuuuwulumn_1nlnmintm 1 pw/nu!nn!nomu'H TRELLIS PAINTED WOOD 81ON BAND ASPHALT 6HBJGLEB 7--- MSMIIIMOMMW li i1. II11Iihlll ■hPllu/1.11'Jlllu. i 1 /u i S 111111 t 11:1., r 1111111111111111 1 111 N l l 117111 BACKIMIT CFL/N EL SIGNS 1�.. •SIGN .................._........lnom .....•..._._ ......•_....•.._..•............ �i SIGN norm BABE Alan STORE PRONT DOORS PAINTED WOOD COLUMNS PREMNG. WO-1. WINDOWS NORTH ELEVATION 171 11... 17111111.11111111. 171111u11/•dII1 111111111.. L.111.111 Pjr 711i1I11111tl 011111121111,1131i _L !11,1,11••' i- 1ii1lIU111111111t11n 1r - 1711.1iii. 1i1111111.1.1:111111Uiu1l•• .. 11ii111 It.1yn11 l .. 111111111111 1111111111111111' 111111111111111111111111111 ....wit 111111IIIIIIhI111IIIIII 111•• . 11( 111 11117111 hill l 1.111111111h.. Sidi/ 1I111m11111S11i11111.1! /711111HI 1 /111 /il t111li's' 1 111111:111111. •.l 11 11 11 :1 11 111 III 1 /I11111111111L llin'•U1.1 I11111111111I117p111h ill11117m l!hAII111811 ill 111111H11I11 111111 ii I hli 411.11 P9. ��1111:111m1nu8un111n1 iliiiiR 8111111 1111 !ISSN:11 211111nt81n1 ll :1111 1111hIilmmsm�tnnluut7pn•uufu 1111 :11 -1111 urnulnuun1111u1inn1111111111111111wu a11pu1ngllnumunuuul 1__;_.._4.I�.______ _ i PAIRED 41ARDI -PL I K LAP BIDI1 • -.... T/ROOF EL. 127-0• T/SIGN BAND EL 114• -e• B/SioN BAND EL. B0'-®• 2 WEST ELEVATION • 11111 'i NIA_ 110hiilli11111Ih li,. r 11 1110111 Iuu11 111 ►. /iiht lil 1/ _— III111111 1, h. ANNIE 11SI11- 2111111111711' ,44401Ni /muStn... menu 7n117i ll. EL I1/8 ".1' 3 I EAST ELEVATION i.. ••t. •711111. 111111.IIt1111.. Iwruuru111m. 111111!118' tII III II 1141111111' 111111INs.11. 111;' 111:11 a 11 111 0 /1111111111111.. 111111111111111. 11' uurm11111116 dIlP.il -11g9 11,11.1_jp4_�n��unl�nnuu�,�Itlhy SIGN PAINTED WOOD TP..SN OATES Wm' -10 1/8 ".1' e TAFOOP E4 L 1-0' "'EL, TSICYJ BAND 1S'-:• e ENSIGN BLAND EL 116' -p• EL. I¢m' -O• ALU . STORE FRONT DOORS 4 I SOUTH ELEVATION NEI zoo sommon rpERIC4. VIM. WOIDdUS iii PAIRED N .1 DOOR 1/8 "_1' RECEIVE c� U( 0 3 ?D03 Ty OP ONO laik eS 1/8 ".1' ARCHITECT 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN AND SPECIFICATION VAS PREPARED BY ME BR UNDER NY DIRECT SUPERVISEIN AND THAT 1 AN A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT ORDER Of LAYS IIF THE STATE OFHIINESOTA AS SIGNIFIED BY MY HAND AND SEAL APETER HILGER 45862 SEAL DRAWN BY PDO REVISIONS APH A -2.1 Lino Lakes Development HODGSON RD. & BIRCH ST. LINO LAKES, MN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE 06.09.03 SCALE 1/8' -I' DRAWN BY PDO CHECKED BY APH A -2.1 .JOB I 02 -041 TYPICAL COLOR SCHEMES: SCHEME 'A' SCHEME'S' SCHEME 'C STONE COLORS SIDING SHAKES - CLAY SIDING - SPICE SIDING - SAND - ASPEN COUNTRY LEDGESTONE - DESERT TAN SHAKES - DESERT TAN SHAKES - DESERT TAN - BUCKS COUNTY DRESSED FIELDSTONE SOFFIT AND FASCIA- COTTAGE WHITE SOFFIT AND FASCIA - COTTAGE WHITE SOFFIT AND FASCIA - COTTAGE WHITE SHUTTERS WHITE SHUTTERS - WHITE SHUTTERS - WHITE VNYLCORNER BOARDS (TYP.) (...EFT ELI =VATI ON 612 PITCH 672 POCH RIGHT ELEVATION 612 PITCH Ii.. a. ; l II'.. •.u.. III immune t�o.o.•• A A I.�N Jf I�TR a REAR ELEVATION 3 1 FRONT ELEVATION 06/05/03 u6in M .mean: • Building Quality Since 1959 LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENT HODGSON RD. AND BIRCH ST. LINO LAKES MN BRUGGEMAN PROPERTIES © OOPIRsIT 1041 NSIOGTNNI IMES • • Dimensions, notes, delaes and conformation fp a9 lord cedes ore to be verified by owner and conlroctor prior to tie stun of construction Philips Morning, Inc. tiJ ass me no responslisity for some after commencement of construction. PC. Rio' C•d a'-e' Td If -41. x74 fwd lYd IY4 R•d u• Sr-s rr 11x L* (� iW6 I I I I I I r , 1- J 1 . 1 1 1 lyl . ` 4 r Mal fait Ion CM menr- C`d K.,x�a/ ume yen W. IV rd I i rFana Colt W. ...1 ` raw /r11DZ r......./rant a amen UNEXCAVATED •M/ r 1M Ilia i a rt-Y 1r N4 110000 al: 01M/ UNEXCAVATED M -r K4 i- i j 110000 aco0 wt. 1 j UNEXCAVATED r •Sao jrAm¢a j 101 aca I r1 O• -r r a o/ uoxxa y 110 ant A UNEXCAVATED T , iw ia1O1ao /rrMir , UNEXCAVATED ra rt'i a Cima0 W-0. rd r -r b I j 1 1 I I UNEXCAVATED i i I lYaL0laaaWOWt 1 j j I i 4' Ma Can MAL 'l h Y rd R4 r 101 1 Can inn vi w1 r r mee 1 1b at A r -r r rolls Can wt me reR0 rd r -r 1 - -- J— r Palo a in ray (— -_ -- ? , --- - - - --1 L 11way 1 r - - U i s§e ` riaat In J V. 14 st _ _ — —� 1 1 `L I.. ti swam -- -"f l l 1 J t rd r 1 - -_� I 1 1: L § 1 1 aauaoJ s r { r4 rd .."'e 1/1 1r-r ra > r -r a) a�aCan A _J K_r ,- r -1 if r /r7 /r w_r tw >r r 7tl'r w-r pd Se rd 7-Y r- 41-11 a -r -r D r R -ir $1. lu°1e rlyd F•OUNED ATION PLAN 3/, s .-, • — 0•• DISCLAIMER MnRMaio K a in 040.01 lf..0 a 1prAylRr�1p/er Ta06 10 n41 yta4y0nt car* Nana pT Rd,C rr& ato 0C1 14 _v w. 0nIaw eiM aawcwsi 1100.113101 i 01.0 yY,1af 10 `II6lNSflp011OLMfD 0ttw4MM03L3�eMMpPGG40RFR R Mt e>a 0,003 1w 11m000 rautT A inco. A niona Mrs 0L Aa Ra MT 9K to R nos 1011000: aa0 JBr Yom, aR6 vra 141 A G QIOps(R06f LE fit may 13.0111 /CO Rea as 6aec ILL 00.11 IIT a M 1A00MY Cr nR a R1tif S Mt ant Al xat tl Ye Mxifl 001 R *0 5155 0Ttw =yRy 10 ILL SW i 1r4aciarda33 i 000 MMES MI MI M10 11**5I D1 0 Ywa yip at 110010 a 00t1t 90441 OR M1O00- ■00 10rRi r 000 ape»nat 10444* Via RIM M 00117 Krenale 0.0110 ION b00R an at Oa11101 ION 9a Ian 1151115113 BRUGGEMAN COMPANIES 3 UNIT TWHSE ON SLAB PLANq&O'1OS -2'J o JJ r ?MD OM OM IO\ w aneTw Dimensions, notes, delois and conformation to all local codes ore to be verified by omen and contractor pro to the start of construction Fillips Banning, Inc. o t osnnme no respansAtity for same after canmencement of construction. CWWWIT 2011 "KM iwoaw r -r 12,4' r' -r rla/ i�iunz • Y UM DO b41 AMYX Irlr • 1* IMO OM MD We UM Iona wn are ex UNEXCAVATED eawir lmos ow mi. IM CM De eOI K -Ir PLAN A/2 — (W1TH OPTIONAL KITCHEN) FOUNDATION PLAN c A f Pam Doc LoU. ow r tam wra we � wium¢ rIr �uw u k If MOM at VMS row /r MOO ON mu ICa ae no UMORAVAIM L -s r wow tow IrS,OW / U04 Ion 0)z nG row /i Imoi o�Yry"SLI> OK euc rim r POLED lac VMS, C aw / DLL OM W DYCAM W r0'-0!• MM US MS MI r< K PM rr — u MS Wok 0 -r r rasa me 1015 row /r U7310M MCI MU aM FA ON ti, UNOCAVATED D -Or A.I&SCO me I•I ro me DC L w-r Y4 U6 11r_r 0L W-r PLAN p — FOUNDATION PLAN (UM WW2 le ran Ml. Igi� 0 -I rta yi Oa WC cm Ira DIM OR L /331.0s cross / xa OK rq UNEXCAVATED 0Yd r aw / MOCSW' vat,\ UNEXCAVATED W m -r r room OK — rm rs r r-0• PLAN p — — PLAN A/2 — (WITH OPTIONAL KITCHEN Op FOUNDATION PLAN FOUNDATION PLAN w BRUGGEMAN COMPANIES 4 UNIT TWHSE ON SLAB UNTS TYPICAL COLOR SCHEMES: SCHEME 'A' SIDING - CLAY SHAKES - DESERT TAN SOFFIT AND FASCIA - COTTAGE WHITE SHUTTERS - WHITE SCHEME SIDING - SPICE SHAKES - DESERT TAN SOFFIT AND FASCIA - COTTAGE WHITE SHUTTERS - WHITE SCHEMEV STONE COLORS SIDING - SAND - ASPEN COUNTRY LEDGESTONE SHAKES - DESERT TAN - BUCKS COUNTY DRESSED FIELDSTONE SOFFIT AND FASCIA- COTTAGE WHITE SHUTTERS -WHITE 511=1E ELM VA TI 1 4 7 ) rurr: 11111111: tHAVA muOMES Building Quality Since 1959 FRQNT ELEVATION 06/05/03 CONCRETE PATIO --FENCE RECEIVED JUL 0 3 2043 CITY OF LINO tAkes LINO LAKES DEVELOPMENT • HODGSON RD. AND BIRCH ST LINO LAKES MN BRUGGEMAN PROPERTIES © comb ma eeecmwl • • • 1 • • 1Rietat rpr6itutiafdh ImedrusramatraldA Low iI r1 M111111111111i. �i111111111.,1 1111111111111W FIRST FLOOR BUILDING PLAN 1/8" = 1' -0" OF AIRSPACE 110E AIRSPACE 10' 11 1/8' 7/8' 10' 10 t /8' 11 7/8' 11 7/8' 2' -8' t OF AIRSPACE 10 1/8' 10' 1' -0 7/8' 11 1 /B' 10' 0 1V MIN _e 1111111111111 111111111111 r .I1 41 �I o .ma 1V n1 t +IlliIlll INEWOO+ m mmillo I I I 1111111111! u 0 JINI SW iJ,rIIuc4ii 1► l� 1111111111111 I 11 I lip 111111111111 If • SECOND FLOOR BUILDING PLAN N 1/8" = 1' -0" DISCLAIMER aueaala wcw irfKM a"raalclas.. soylIloONtlr ualwamnc uo maa....wa ,41.0a,a ,... "illnr16Rasial tl.'1 rarualwaw _ JUL cry of p 3 2003 LINO 1.4ks MORI BRUGGEMAN COMPANIES B UNIT TWHSE ON SLAB PLANS 01 171 5 -z7J • Co-auoµ s2A311'uw,,, PMPIRMCS/1.,41YLS INFILTRATION BASINS: INF 1 13,504 S.F. INF 2 13506 S.F. : "° e .. ,. • _ TOTAL 27,010 S.F. /0.62 ACRESi� X 0.5' OF AVERAGE DEPTH 13505 C.F /0.31 ACRE -FEET (0.554 ACRE -FEET REQUIRED) IMPACT: FILL - 35,340 S.F. CONVERTED - 26,248 S.F, TOTAL 61,588 S.F. - IMPACTED MITIGATION: NEW WETLAND - 57,448 S.F. BUFFER - 56,177 S.F. TOTAL 113,625 S.F. - MITIGATED 15:1:::;:;:;:x:: BUFFER NEW CONVERTED FILL o-nO .C.O....,v.ei.«..3.4- GEK,130033-LIMO u.O:...a.l,0cr.,o 07/01/2 803 II.26 w [PI O 50 75 100 SC LE IN 150 200 FEET a r 34 $98.47 _s: SO iiao III a /aim / / / / /.. 100 VOA ML • 55343 W. • • 52.00 15 T. 001702 d. • 90540 M1 • AGENDA ITEM V. C. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: August 13, 2003 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Northeast Corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Hokanson Development has submitted a request for a comprehensive plan amendment. The subject site is four acres of property at the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane, adjacent to the existing Marshan Lake Condominiums The request is to change the land use category from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential. This would be consistent with the adjacent development. ANALYSIS • Land Use, Density, Zoning • The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Single Family Home and Vacant Medium Density Residential R -4 High Density Residential North Marshan Lake Condominiums Medium Density Residential R -4 High Density Residential South commercial (Automotive Refinish Technol.) Performance Land Use R -1, Single Family Residential East Marshan Lake Condominiums Medium Density Residential R -4 High Density Residential West Lake Drive, Wenzel Farm townhomes Medium Density Residential R -3 Medium Density PDO The Marshan Lake Condominiums were approved in 1995, with the second phase approved in 1996. The City began work on a new comprehensive plan in 1996 -97. The future land use map in the comprehensive plan was created as part of the planning process. The comprehensive plan was approved by the City Council in 2002. • The entire Marshan Lake Condominiums site and the remaining four -acres along Lake Drive is guided Medium Density Residential. This allows a density of 3 -6 units per acre. However, the existing condominium townhomes were built at a density greater than six units per acre, in accordance with the approved site plans. That is, the land use map shows the development at a lower density than how it was actually approved and built. It is impossible to know exactly what caused this inconsistency, but several things may account for it. One, the method of calculating density has varied from project to project over the past years. Two, acreage data in the review of phase two of the condominium project seems to vary from data used in phase one. These differences in the data may have resulted in density calculations that were slightly above or slightly below six units per acre. Three, a structure was deleted from the plan somewhere in the 1995 review process: a four -unit building straddled the property line on the site plan. This further confuses the data for that project. At any rate, using upland data only and subtracting the parkland, the Marshan Lake Condominiums project includes 134 units on 20.9 acres: 6.4 units per acre. This falls into the High Density Residential land use category of the comprehensive plan. The site is zoned R -4. One important aspect of the recent zoning ordinance overhaul was to specify the zoning districts that correspond with the land use categories in the comprehensive plan. Section 6, Subd. 6.C. of the zoning ordinance states: Land to be zoned R -4 must be in a High Density land use category according to the comprehensive plan, and development density within an R -4 District shall be within a range of six (6) to twelve (12) units per acre and shall be based on the buildable area. Future Site Development It is important to note that there is no actual development application yet. Until the City receives a site development application in the future, there is no way to know what site layout or actual density is possible under current regulations. A concept plan shows 38 units planned for the site, which would be 9.5 units per acre. The R -4 zoning requirements as well as the shoreland ordinance requirements will apply. Setbacks, impervious surface, and other requirements will affect the number of units. Other aspects of site design also will be examined upon reception of a site plan application. (For example, the existing private drive serving units north of the site appears to be centered on the property line.) Any application that involves platting, variances, or conditional use permits will require public review. Subdividing the land for buildings on individual lots would require a plat. Building more than one principal building on one lot requires a planned unit • development, which would require a conditional use permit under the new ordinance. Therefore, either of these options will require a public hearing. • • Approval of the comprehensive plan amendment in no way gives any explicit or implicit approval of any site plan or development application. Development of the site will require application for the approval of such things as a plat, site plan and building plan, conditional use permit, and any other approval that applies. Submittal to Metropolitan Council Under state law, a comprehensive plan amendment requires submittal to the Metropolitan Council. The City approval of the amendment will be contingent upon Met Council approval. In summary, the salient facts are: • The existing adjacent development of 134 condominium/townhome units was built at 6.4 units per acre: a density that falls in the High Density category. However, the comprehensive plan lists it as Medium Density. • The site is zoned R -4, which is intended to be in the High Density land use category. • The current Medium Density classification does not allow the four -acre site to be developed at a density consistent with the adjacent neighborhood. • Approval of the comprehensive plan amendment does not imply any project approval. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the comprehensive plan amendment. OPTIONS 1. Conduct and close public hearing. Approve the amendment to the comprehensive plan to change the land use category from Medium Density to High Density, and submit the amendment to the Metropolitan Council. 2. Return to staff with direction (continue public hearing or close hearing and table the application). RECOMMENDATION Option 1 REHABILITATION CENTER 2 ti 6 4 5 6 m 3 2 2 3 I0 7 4 14 13 STALE, IHUM( HIGH AY 110.49 -74TH— STREET -6 -- STR E 2 3 DRIVE Aa POLL 2 4N,N60MES s 4 5 6 12 C.S.A.H. f2 ) . .MEADOWS 7 3 4 2 SUB. 3 NO. TRACT C 182 MARSHAN LAKE THE CHURCH CE 1ST. JOSEPH CINNAMON TEAL COURT 11 la 2- ffi'ssl�! ;� jai �M _2gti�6 III 21/1 Min 111C Di inclerall WS dr9 r 8 17 A.111 gid ®= � s®ip' r1 L MI Inns au maim smongl 5\4" njuirapormsecri OU 2 0 I T© I D�wstii TLOT A 'JLM 4 3 �o p ®y ME . 3 ,lcam 17 VILE 1619 NIE arra N. luau MA OR. EMI 3 ©ate i I13* x El It RICE LAKE / RESHAN • PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Low Density Sewered Residential Low Density Sewered Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Low Dens. Sewered Resid. Private Airfield 2owv.dG I - MARSHAN LA Diirftc 1 Avc • AGENDA ITEM 5D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala P & Z MEETING DATE: August 13, 2003 TOPIC: Preliminary Plat for Marshan Lake Industrial Park (Lakes Business Park) ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND The applicant, Glenn Rehbein, is requesting Preliminary Plat approval for a four lot subdivision, to be sited on 30.6 acres of land for the purposes of developing an industrial park. The property is located northeast of Blue Heron Elementary School and west of Lake Drive. This property is guided for Industrial Use, zoned LI -Light Industrial, and is located within the existing MUSA area. This review is based on the most current submittal, consisting of the following plans: • • Marshan Lakes Industrial Park: 1. Certificate of Survey, received 7- 14 -03. 2. Preliminary Plat, received 7- 14 -03. 3. Tree Inventory Plan, dated 7- 11 -03. 4. Tree Preservation Plan, dated 7- 11 -03. 5. Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan, dated 7- 11 -03. 6. Utility Plan, dated 7- 11 -03. • Panattoni Site: 1. Site Plan, dated 7- 11 -03. 2. "Build to Suit" Site Plans (P -1, A2.0 -.1, A5.0, El, L1 -2), dated 7- 11 -03. ANALYSIS Project Data: • Total Site Area: Upland Area: Number of Lots: 30.6 acres 28.1 acres 4 lots Planning & Zoning Board Marshan Lake Industrial Park August 13, 2003 Zoning & Land Use. The property is currently guided for Industrial use under the City's comprehensive plan and zoned LI, Light Industrial. The following table summarizes adjacent zoning and land use: Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Zoning Site Vacant Industrial Light Industrial North Vacant Commercial General Business East Tax Preparation and Insurance Business, Single Family Industrial Light Industrial Southeast (east of Lake Drive) Single Family Residential and Vacant Low Density Sewered and Un- Sewered Residential R -1, Single Family and R -2, Two Family Residential South Landscaping Business Industrial Light Industrial Southwest Elementary School Public /Semi -Public Public /Semi- Public West I -35W I -35W I -35W Lot Size. The minimum lot size in the Light Industrial District is one acre for a sewered lot. All lots meet or exceed this provision, ranging in size from 3.9 acres to 13.5 acres. Lot Width. The minimum lot width in the Light Industrial District is 100 feet. All lots meet or exceed this provision. Setbacks. The following setback requirements will need to be satisfied in conjunction with individual site plan approvals: Streets Local 30 ft. Collector /Arterial 40 ft. 35W 50 Parking Lot 15 ft. Rear Yard Principal Building Parking Lot Side Yard Principal Building Parking Lot • 15 ft. 5 ft. lO ft. 5 ft. • Planning & Zoning Board Marshan Lake Industrial Park August 13, 2003 The lots are of adequate size to accommodate required building and parking setbacks. However, the plat should identify a 50 -foot building setback from Lake Drive, which is a Minor Arterial. Access /Circulation. The property is proposed to be accessed from Lake Drive via a new street. The proposed street, which will terminate with a cul -de -sac, is approximately 460 feet in length. Chapter 302 of City Code sets maximum cul -de -sac length at 500 feet. The proposed street is in conformance with this provision. The proposed access is approximately a quarter mile between both Town Center Parkway and Elm Street and is generally consistent with Anoka County access spacing guidelines. Additionally, the proposed intersection will provide access to future residential development on the east side of Lake Drive. Traffic Impacts. A detailed traffic study was initiated by the City Council in June of 2003 to address traffic impacts from the Marshan Lakes Business Park and the proposed Village development. While the overall study is still in progress the portion relating to the Marshan Lakes Business Park has been completed. A report, dated August 7, 2003, from Glen Van Wormer, the City's Traffic Engineering Consultant, is attached. In summary, the traffic generated by the Lino Lakes Business Park will not require significant improvements be made to Lake Drive other than construction of a southbound right turn lane and a potential northbound left turn lane. With the provision of both northbound and southbound turn lanes onto the industrial park access road, any potential vehicle delays will not impact traffic on Lake Drive itself. A southbound turn lane on Lake Drive is proposed to accommodate vehicle turning movements into the development. Staff is also recommending construction of a northbound left turn lane as a requirement of plan approval, subject to Anoka County concurrence. Street width. Section 302 of City Code requires a minimum of 60 feet of right -of -way for cul -de -sacs, and 120 feet for arterial streets. The proposed cul -de -sac satisfies this requirement. However, the plat does not provide the necessary right -of -way along Lake Drive. Sixty feet of right -of -way from the centerline of Lake Drive (C.S.A.H. 23) will be required. Additional right -of -way will be required at the intersection of the new street and Lake Drive to accommodate future signalization and road improvements to be deteimuned by the City Engineer. The street is proposed to be constructed to a 40 foot width which is adequate to service industrial traffic. • Access control, dedicated to Anoka County, should be shown on the plat on Lots 1 and 4 adjacent to Lake Drive. • • Planning & Zoning Board Marshan Lake Industrial Park August 13, 2003 Grading and Drainage. A grading and drainage plan has been submitted for review by the City. The existing drainage flows north to Anoka County Ditch No. 10, which runs along the northern property line of the proposed plat. An existing private drainage ditch runs northerly through the property into the County Ditch Ten. The private ditch will be diverted into a proposed storm sewer to accommodate site grading. The new storm sewer will be routed through on -site infiltration basins and/or holding ponds and ultimately into County Ditch Ten. The County ditch will be preserved in its existing condition. The City Engineer has completed a review of the Grading and Drainage Plan. His comments, dated August 8, 2003, are attached. Utilities. The subdivision is proposed to be serviced with public sanitary sewer and water utilities. The sanitary sewer service will be provided by the existing trunk sanitary sewer main that runs along the west side of the site, parallel to I -35W. The sanitary sewer laterals will be extended through the site and out to Lake Drive. Sanitary sewer will need to be extended to the north property line adjacent to Lake Drive. A twelve -inch water main is proposed to be extended from the existing trunk water main along I35W to Lake Drive. The water main will need to be extended to both the north and south property lines adjacent to Lake Drive. The City Engineer has completed a review of the Utility Plan. His comments, dated August 8, 2003, are attached. Drainage and Utility Easements. Drainage and utility easements are required. Drainage and utility easements at least ten (10) feet wide shall be provided on all exterior lot lines, and centered on common rear and side lot lines. These drainage and utility easements should be shown on the preliminary plat. Drainage and utility easements are proposed around the existing wetlands as well as around the proposed ponding areas. A 100 -foot wide drainage and utility easement covers the entirety of Anoka County Ditch Ten. A utility easement will need to be provided for the sanitary sewer and water mains extending across Lot 3, with size and width to be determined by the City Engineer. Floodplain. The portion of the site which bounds County Ditch Number 10 lies within a Flood Plain Zone A. This affected portion of the ditch runs generally east -west across the northern portion of the property. Zone A represents areas of 100 year flood where base flood elevations have not been determined. The City's Floodplain Management Ordinance requires that all principle structures be located no lower than one foot above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The remainder of the project is locate in Zone C, a non -flood plain area, and no impacts to the flood plain are proposed as a result of the project. Wetlands. The project site contains 1.5 acres of wetland, comprising two wetlands: one on Lot 3 and one on Lot 4. No filling or alterations of the wetlands are proposed as part of the project. • • • Planning & Zoning Board Marshan Lake Industrial Park August 13, 2003 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.4300, subpart 14 requires the preparation of an EAW for industrial and commercial projects that exceed a gross floor space threshold of 300,000 sq.ft. for 3rd or 4th class cities. Because subdivision of the property provides the potential for this threshold to be exceeded, an EAW has been prepared. The EAW was reviewed by the City's Environmental Board on July 30t , and approved by the City Council for distribution and comment on July 14, 2003. The required 30 -day public comment period ends on August 21St Minnesota Statute 16D.04 prohibits final decisions on a proposed project until a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is made. A copy of the EAW is attached to this report. Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). A RCWD Land Development permit is required for the proposed project. The project is scheduled to be reviewed by the RCWD Board on August 13th. Anoka County. Plans have been forwarded to Anoka County for review. An Anoka County access permit onto Lake Drive for the proposed roadway will be required. It is also likely the County will require the dedication of right -of -way along Lake Drive, dedication of access control for Lot 1 and Lot 4 that abut Lake Drive, and turn lane improvements to Lake Drive. Conditions of approval will include the requirements set forth by Anoka County. Tree Preservation. A Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan were submitted. However, the preservation plan does not identify trees to be removed as part of the project. Based on the grading plan submitted, the majority of trees on the interior of the property will be removed. It does appear, however, that the majority of trees located adjacent to County Ditch Ten and within the proposed 100 -foot easement can be preserved. A revised Preservation Plan shall be submitted identifying trees to be preserved and methods of protection. Such plans will be subject to review and approval by the City's Environmental Specialist. Landscaping/Buffer. The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance (Sec. 3, subd. 4.Q.1 & Sec. 8, subd. 1.F) specifies that a landscape buffer should be provided along side or rear lot lines for sites located in the Light Industrial District which abut residential or commercial districts or road right -of -ways. Such a strip should be at least 40 feet in width and result in 80% opacity. Lots 1, 2, and 4 are subject to this requirement. The existing features that will be preserved on the north side of Lot 2, bordering County Ditch Ten, will satisfy this requirement. The eastern side of Lot 2 includes a 12 -foot rise in elevation over the proposed building floor elevation which will, in conjunction with landscaping required as part of site development approvals, result in adequate buffering of the site. • • Planning & Zoning Board Marshan Lake Industrial Park August 13, 2003 However, a combination of grading and landscaping will be required on Lot 1 and Lot 4 adjacent to Lake Drive. Additional topographic alterations to these lots, such as mounding and berming to provide additional screening, should be incorporated into the grading plan. There are currently no plans for additional buffering of the General Business District which abuts the site to the north, the existing ditch and trees provide a natural buffer between the two districts. Park Dedication The City will require a payment in lieu of Park Dedication. The park dedication rate is $,2175.00 per acre for Commercial/Industrial Developments. The total park dedications is estimated to be $61,118.00. Individual Site Development. Development on the individual lots will be subject to the City's Site Plan Review requirements. The City has received application for a Site & Building Plan Review on Lot 2 for a warehouse /distribution facility, which is a permitted use in the LI, Light Industrial District. Staff is currently reviewing this proposal in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed 265,000 square foot Panatonni Project includes approximately 15,000 square feet of office space. Proposed building materials consists of scored concrete tip - up panels. Three color palettes will be used on the exterior of the building ranging from light beige to reddish accent panels. Landscaping is provided along the perimeter and interior of the site. Landscaping is proposed to be clumped in intervals along the rear of the building to provide visual breaks of the building line. Net Lawn pervious paving is proposed for the fire lane adjacent to the existing County Ditch to reduce run -off volumes. Issues being addressed by Staff, other than those related specifically to the plat review, contained herein, concern landscaping and buffering of the building (specifically the loading docks) from Lake Drive, and adjacent properties. Environmental Board Recommendation. On July 30th the Lino Lakes Environmental Board reviewed the proposed project. After consideration of the issues, the board voted to recommend approval of the project, with a number of recommendations. These recommendations are summarized in an attached memo from the City's Environmental Specialist, dated July 31, 2003. Findings 1. The proposed plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed plat is consistent with City infill policies. The project lies within existing MUSA, the cost of infrastructure improvements are covered by the developer. • Planning & Zoning Board Marshan Lake Industrial Park August 13, 2003 3. With the required turn lane improvements to Lake Drive the roads serving the proposed development are capable of serving the development. 4. The City's Water system is adequate to service the proposed development. 5. The City's Waste Disposal Systems is adequate to service the proposed development. 6. The proposed plat satisfies the City's minimum lot size requirements. 7. The proposed plat with the recommendations setforth herein provide sufficient right - of -way and easements for public street and utility purposes. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Marshan Lakes Industrial Park with the following conditions: 1. The City shall not make any final decision on the proposed project until such time as a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is made or an EIS is determined adequate. 2. A revised Preliminary Plat is prepared including the following: a. 60 feet of right -of -way, from the centerline of Lake Drive (CSAH 23), is shown for dedication. b. Additional Right -of -Way, as determined by the City Engineer, at the intersection of Lake Drive and the proposed road is shown for dedication. c. Drainage and Utility Easements along all property lines and covering all public utilities, wetlands, and ponding areas. d. Setbacks in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Access control shall be dedicated to Anoka County along Lake Drive. 4. A southbound right turn lane and northbound left turn lane shall be constructed on Lake Drive. All costs of such improvements and any necessary easements and/or right -of -way acquisition shall be the responsibility of the developer. 5. The plat shall be subject to review and approval from Anoka County. 6. Rice Creek Watershed District approval shall be obtained prior to Council consideration of preliminary plat request. 7. All comments setforth in the City Engineer's memo, dated August 8, 2003, shall be incorporated in the development plans. 8. Water Main shall be extended to the north and south property lines, adjacent to Lake Drive. Sanitary Sewer lines shall be extended to the north property line along Lake Drive. 9. A revised Tree Preservation Plan shall be submitted and identify tree proposed to be saved and methods of protection. 10. The grading plan shall be modified to include additional topographic alterations along the easterly sides of Lots 1 and 4 to provide for screening. 11. The developer shall enter into a Development Contract with the City. ATTACHMENTS • 1. General Location Map 2. City Engineers Comments dated August 8, 2003 Planning & Zoning Board Marshan Lake Industrial Park August 13, 2003 3. Traffic Report, dated August 7, 2003 4. Environmental Board Comments 5. Certificate of Survey 6. Preliminary Plat 7. Tree Inventory Plan 8. Tree Preservation Plan 9. Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan 10. Utility Plan 11. Panattonni Site Plans (P -1, A2.0 -.1, A5.0, El, L1 -2), dated 7- 11 -03. 12. Environmental Assessment Worksheet • • rwGwr-t0 - nY Y NO SO K t_- i6IWYFY, i i aW4m o MOMM6[ il i � t �� s- - - i w E- - ee' - 7/177ilull 1 71111. � ME v P�_ � OP c+O�eocov� ° :P2� �s 1 p am¢� ©p Beni Utz,. 1119 p ■ , Erifilummageggeg liotdmigxY siviia 110111111111111111111 artillor Pr ".411 iir—iiiiiiiiiiiiLite" "" mi licitiiii. 41 Ili 111111:111111V1.* 1!!Ii!I!!!tii1(&iinhIII IlLid PIPAINEn al X1I C , XES 8 MP. pLAC - 1 - - - -- - - - - -- -,IiiIIIIII1 m ,L. EA 9°1" 0 5,1P GEORGE Ivy " Q ra.©�d. =n 1, SUM it rix, PO LI Inc Eliti ©W . 000 r°-'o© Ida Leo NEBG UtWF '. sIf1LIC iffariciii gm - ; mzscccm.pm Kg off., FRP= Iniragitn an /WIC oo ©u iijj macor3 CIIMITELamp RICE LAKE RESHANAU LAKE Memorandum DATE: August 8, 2003 TO: Mike Grochala FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Marshan Lake Industrial Park/Panattoni Development Attached is the TKDA design review memorandum dated August 7, 2003, of the submitted documents for the proposed Marshan Lake Industrial Park/Panattoni Site. The project is in general conformance with the City of Lino Lakes standards. Please contact me at 651/982 -2430 with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651- 982 -2400 ® Fax: 651- 982 -2499 ® TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: Copies To: From: Date: James Studenski, City Engineer Scott A. Brink, P.E. August 7, 2003 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Reference: Marshan Lake Industrial Park/ Comm. No. Routing: Panattoni Development City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 12701 -002 The Marshan Lake Industrial Park/Panattoni Development as presented proposes to construct a 265,000 square foot office /warehouse facility on over 17 acres of property, located between Lake Drive and I -35 W, just south and west of the City Hall complex. The building itself is located on 13.5 acres. The proposed Panatonni site property is part of a larger area referred to as the Marshan Lake Industrial Park. For purposes of simplification, this review shall be identified and referred to as the Panatonni Development. The following plans and documentation have been submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, and these preliminary review comments are presented based on that submittal: 1. Preliminary Plat, Marsh Lake Industrial Park, prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies and dated July 14, 2003. 2. Certificate of Survey, Marsh Lake Industrial Park, prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies and dated July 14, 2003. 3. Site Plan, Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Utility Plan, Details Plan, Inventory Plan, and Tree Preservation Plan, (Sheets 1 through 7), prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies and dated July 11, 2003. Revised Grading Plan dated July 24, 2003 also received. 4. Architectural Drawings , prepared by Heitman Architects, Inc., and dated July 11, 2003, Sheets P -1, A2.0, A2.1, and A5.0. 5. Landscape Plans, prepared by Landscape Architecture Master Planning Environmental Design, dated July 14, 2003. 6. Application for General Storm Water Permit for Construction (MPCA) and Rice Creek Watershed District Infiltration Worksheet 7. Drainage Calculations prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies and dated July 27, 2003, and Drainage Area Maps received July 25, 2003, prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies. 8. Soil Boring Map of Marshan Lake Industrial Park dated July 28, 2003, prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies 9. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review, prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc. and dated July 11, 2003. 10. Wetland Delineation Report, prepared by Polaris group and dated May 2003. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Panatonni Development Page 2 August 7, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota General 1. It is proposed to extend a street section (cul -de -sac) from Lake Drive to service the proposed development. Lake Drive is under the jurisdiction of Anoka County (CSAH 49), and the proposed street connection must be approved by the County. It should also be defined if the proposed cul -de- sac is to be a private drive or public street. 2. The wetland delineation report suggests that at least some portions of wetland, ditch, and flood plain will be filled as a result of the proposed construction. Some additional ponding areas are proposed to be created as part of the grading plan to provide for stormwater detention. The proposed grading plan will require approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District to confirm requirements for stormwater treatment, stormwater conveyance, appropriate compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act, and mitigation requirements for flood plain filling. The Developer shall provide copies of the permit application and Watershed correspondence. 3. The geotechnical evaluation reports that the underlying soils are generally sands and silty sands with the water table varying in depth. In general, the evaluation reports that the underlying soils are suitable to support the proposed building and infrastructure. However, the evaluation also states that siltier soils should be removed and replaced with drier granular material and compacted accordingly. For pavement areas, the upper 3 feet must be compacted to 100 per cent of standard proctor density. Utility installation will likely require dewatering and some placement of crushed rock where the siltier soils may not provide sufficient bedding. 4. The Landscape Plan must be adjusted as needed to avoid any plantings over utilities, especially sanitary sewer and water. Preliminary Plat 1. The preliminary plat is subject to the review and approval of Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2. Drainage and utility easements (10 feet in width) must be provided around the perimeter of the property. A 40 -foot wide utility easement must be provided for the proposed sanitary sewer and water mains between the cul -de -sac and the west property line. Drainage and utility easements must also be provided for all storm sewer pipes and ponding areas. Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan 1. Because the site area exceeds one acre, the development falls under the new rules requiring an NPDES permit. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining this permit. Silt fence and erosion control measures are provided on the plan. • 2. There are various numbers on Sheet 2 that apparently refer to grading notes on Sheet 3. There should be a footnote identifying this referencing. Panatonni Development Page 3 August 7, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 3. A typical section (pavement section) must be provided for the proposed street entryway (bituminous thickness, gravel base thickness, etc.). The street is identified as 40 feet in width with B618 concrete curb and gutter. Termination and matching of the curb into CSAH 49 must be coordinated with Anoka County. 4. The slope and grade of the cul -de -sac gutter is identified as 0.6 %, but appears to be much flatter based on the proposed spot elevations. It is recommended that the grades be further reviewed and adjusted as needed to provide proper drainage. 5. Any imported topsoil, fill material, or granular materials for roadway and building foundation (material and source) must be approved by the City Engineer. 6. A note shall be provided that any clearing of trees shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of Mn/DOT 2101. 7. All grading shall be confined to the property. No additional runoff from the site shall enter upon neighboring properties. If grading requires any work into the adjoining property, the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining authorization as needed. • 8. All storm sewer structures and types identified should also refer to City of Lino Lakes standards. In • addition, flow direction arrows on the storm sewer lines are needed. 9. A right turn lane on CSAH 49 is proposed for the southbound approach to the site. The proposed shoulder /turn lane section shown must be approved by Anoka County. 10. The graphic for TuffTurf does not show up clearly on the plan and should be adjusted accordingly. 11. The Mn/DOT Specification for turf restoration (2575) and a seed mixture approved by the City must be specified. Drainage Calculations 1. Emergency overflow locations and elevations for the ponds and infiltration areas must be identified. 2. Proposed ponds 1, 4, and 5 have proposed pond bottoms below the groundwater level. 3. High water elevations for the wetlands are not shown. The information submitted does not indicate if the wetland elevations will rise or be impacted by the proposed construction. In addition, the school pond must be modeled for existing and proposed conditions. The existing conditions appear to be correct while the proposed condition must be revised accordingly. 4. The wetland and Pond 5 should be modeled separately (not combined) to determine their respective flood elevations. • • Panatonni Development Page 4 August 7, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 5. Storm sewer computations have not been submitted. 6. An average of SCS Type A and Type B soils should be used to determine curve numbers for the proposed conditions. 7. The existing condition curve numbers and times of concentration utilized are acceptable. 8. As previously stated, approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District should be attained prior to the City granting final approval. Utility Plan 1. The plan proposes to extend sanitary sewer and water across the site from Lake Drive to existing facilities at the west boundary of the site. However, the connection and termination points for these mains are not identified clearly. In particular, the location of the watermain and sanitary sewer termination point connections on Lake Drive are not identified. Because records do not indicate any existing sewer or water on Lake Drive at this time, it is assumed that the utilities will be stubbed to a location that should be identified specifically on the plan, and field adjusted as required. It is also believed that the intent is to connect the watermain to an existing stub (10 -inch or 12 -inch) line near the west boundary of the property. The size of the connecting stub must be identified and field verified as necessary, and may require replacement to a 12 -inch size. A valve must also be installed at the point of connection. The sanitary sewer proposes connecting to an existing manhole along the west side of the property, that appears to connect directly to an existing 12 -inch trunk main. This should also be field verified. 2. The sizes proposed for the sanitary sewer and water mains are currently being reviewed in accordance with the City's overall comprehensive plan and potential development beyond the Panatonni site itself. 3. All sanitary sewer service pipe shall be SDR 26 or Schedule 40. 4. All sanitary sewer main pipe is identified as 8 -inch diameter size with a slope of 0.22 %. The minimum grade for an 8 -inch pipe is 0.40% per State of Minnesota standards. The sanitary sewer design therefore needs to be revised accordingly. 5. All watermain and sewer appurtenances shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the standards of the City of Lino Lakes. Gate valves shall be Mueller A- 2370 -20 with mechanical joints, meeting AWWA Specifications C500 -61. 6. Lake Drive must be completely restored to the full satisfaction of Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes. Traffic control during construction must be provided in accordance with the State of Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and the requirements of Anoka County. Panatonni Development Page 5 August 7, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 7. It is advised that additional storm sewer design data (rim and invert elevations, pipe sizes, slopes, etc.) be shown on the Utility Plan. Much of the storm sewer information can be shown more clearly on this sheet than on the Grading Plan, where the amount of information is extensive and becomes cluttered and hard to read. All storm sewer pipe sizes must also be shown on the plan. 8. Watermain is proposed to be looped around the building. The number and location of fire hydrants shall be approved by the City Fire Chief. It is also recommended that hydrants placed on the street extension, particularly at Lake Drive and at the cul -de -sac circle. 9. The notes on the utility plan must be numbered to provide better reference and identification. 10. Testing of all sanitary sewer and watermain shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, specifications of the City Engineers Association of Minnesota, the Minnesota Department of Health, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as required. 11. The parking lot pavement design must refer to the appropriate MnDot Specification for the mix provided. The Class 5 must also meet the requirements of MnDot 2211, and must be placed on a suitable granular base as approved by the City Engineer and recommended in the soils report. In the event the subgrade is determined to be unsuitable, a 2 -foot subcut and placement of granular material must be performed. • 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110 -5196 651.490.2000 651.490.2150 FAX architecture engineering • environmental transportation August 7, 2003 Mr. Mike Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mike: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Lino Lakes Business Park Traffic Study SEH No. A- LINOL0306.00 14.00 We are continuing with our Lake Drive Traffic Study and have completed the portion of the study relating to the proposed Lino Lakes Business Park. Preliminary calculations for the traffic from the business park were utilized in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The development consists of 265,000 square feet of light manufacturing and warehouse. The business park also includes three outlots on 16.3 acres. For the purpose of the EAW, a full build - out condition for maximum development each of the outlot parcels could support was identified. Outlot A had a conceptual building of 38,400 square feet with light manufacturing, office and retail sales. Outlot B had an office building of 28,800 square feet. Outlot C had a building of 34,000 square feet for light manufacturing with an upper office of an additional 10,000 square feet. Using those development concepts for the outlots and the 265,000 square foot facility for the Stage 1 proposal, trip generation for the site was calculated. General trip rate information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook was utilized and modified to reflect the traffic characteristics of the area. For the purposes of this traffic study, the maximum development that could be supported on each of the outlots as identified in the EAW was utilized. No trip reduction was made for interaction between various land uses within the business park. There was also no reduction in assessing impact of traffic on Lake Drive due to "pass -by trips," which occur when an existing motorist on Lake Drive becomes one of the trips to and from the site. Based on the characteristics in traffic cited above, the site will generate 284 vehicle trips in the PM Peak Hour. There will be 65 inbound vehicles and 219 outbound vehicles. One hundred forty -two (142) of the exiting vehicles will turn left to travel northeast on Lake Drive. Seventy -seven (77) will turn right and travel southwest on Lake Drive. From Mn/DOT Traffic Volume Maps, average daily traffic on Lake Drive near Elm Street is 10,000 vehicles per day. It is estimated that there are 800 vehicles on Lake Drive in the PM Peak Hour with approximately 60 percent northbound. Vehicles turning right out of the development will have little problem finding gaps in the traffic. At an average rate of more than one vehicle per minute, the gaps should be adequate. Vehicles turning left will find some delays, depending on the rate of release from the various land uses on the site. The average will be approximately five vehicles every two minutes turning left. With the traffic signal at Elm Street, there should be gaps in northbound traffic to accommodate these vehicles. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. • Your Trusted Resource • Equal Opportunity Employer • • Mr. Mike Grochala August 7, 2003 Page 2 There may be some delays if concurrent southbound gaps do not occur. However, the delays will be on the access road to Lake Drive and will not impact traffic on Lake Drive itself. Based on the 2020 Traffic Volume Forecast in the Lino Lakes Transportation Plan, traffic volumes on Lake Drive are anticipated to increase to 17,300 vehicles per day. Traffic signals are anticipated on Lake Drive at Elm Street and at Town Center Parkway, as well as at the ramps to I -35W. The traffic signals will platoon traffic in both directions on Lake Drive past the Lino Lakes Business Park. Traffic traveling south on Lake Drive can easily be absorbed into the traffic flow using the gaps in traffic from the signal at Town Center Parkway. The number of trips in the PM Peak Hour will not affect the capacity of the roadway since they will be slightly more than one vehicle per minute. Traffic from the development traveling north on Lake Drive will add an average of five vehicles every two minutes. Traffic will need to enter Lake Drive in the gaps from the traffic signals at the adjacent intersections. If gaps are not readily available, it is anticipated that some of the traffic turning left, with an ultimate south destination, will turn right and utilize the regional road system to access I -35W at other locations. It is estimated that approximately 40 percent of the northbound traffic will turn left to go south on I -35W. Thirty percent will go north on I -35W and 30 percent will continue north on Lake Drive. With this distribution, the only noticeable impact will be northbound traffic traveling through the intersection with Town Center Parkway where the additional 142 vehicles in the PM Peak Hour will be noticeable, but will not decrease the level of service. In the AM Peak Hour, the site will generate 268 vehicle trips. A large percent will be inbound. Only 33 exiting vehicles are anticipated with the higher volume traveling to the south. It is anticipated that there will be 235 inbound vehicles with 153 right turns and 82 left turns to the site. The relatively high volume of right turns in the AM Peak Hour, coupled with the day long use by heavy commercial vehicles, makes a southbound right turn lane very desirable. It is suggested that a southbound right turn lane be constructed as part of the development. The northbound traffic volumes will find a left turn lane desirable, but not necessary until traffic volumes on Lake Drive increase. It is anticipated that the additional volumes forecasted for Lake Drive in the Transportation Plan will require widening and turn lanes along the entire roadway. A left turn lane could be constructed as part of the overall widening. Anoka County may require a left turn lane be constructed as part of the initial development. The traffic generated by the Lino Lakes Business Park will not require significant improvements be made to Lake Drive other than the suggested southbound right turn lane and the potential northbound left turn lane. Combined with additional volumes from other developments and with the general growth of traffic in the area, Lake Drive, and especially the area through the I -35W interchange, will require widening and turn lanes. This widened section can be extended past the Lino Lakes Business Park access to provide the desirable left turn lanes. The calculations contained in this report are based on the proposed development for the major site and maximum potential development on the three outlots. A change to a less intense land use or reduction in the size of the development will reduce the number of trips generated by the site. • • Mr. Mike Grochala August 7, 2003 Page 3 These reductions to a less intense development could reduce the volumes in the PM Peak Hour to approximately 225 total trips with an average daily traffic volume of approximately 1,800 to 1,900. If you have questions or need additional information regarding this traffic study, please call me. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Glen Van Wormer, PE Senior Transportation Engineer sah \\ spfil esl\ splA ko\ linol\ 030600\corres \grochala080703.doc • Memo To: Michael Grochalla CC: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: July 31, 2003 Re: Recommendations of the July 30, 2003 Environmental Board Environmental Board Meeting Date: July30, 2003 • Topic: Marshan Lake Industrial Park, Panattonni Site, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review. • Recommendations: The Environmental Board recommended that the developer follow all staff recommendations and the following: • That the tabulation of percent impervious on sheet P1 of the Developer's proposal be verified. • Reduce the number of parking stalls to a minimum • Lights should be turned off after hours (not 24 hour use) when not in use. • A Tree preservation plan needs to be submitted. • Work with staff on landscape plan. Use native plants. • Use native seed (City seed spec) on all indicated native grass areas. • Use a competant native seed landscape company to install and maintain the native seed areas (5 -year minimum) • Follow the City ordinance for the lighting plan and use of fixtures. • Request P8 phospherous model to demonstrate that post development phospherous loads to Marshan Lake would not exceed pre- existing development conditions. • More trees should be added to the landscape plan. More native -oaks should be used. • Page 1 Additional recommendations as presented in the Staff Report: • Ensure there is adequate seperation between the seasonally high ground water table and the bottom ellevations of the ponds. Needs to be at least 3 -4 feet. Motion Motion made by Grundhoffer and second by O'Connell to approve the Panattonni site plan with above recommendations. All were in favor. Panattonni site plan was approved. _ Topic: Woodstone Builders Recommendations: The Environmental Board made the following recommendations concerning Woodstone Builders: More Trees be planted along Apollo Drive Verify the percent impervious figure. Reduce impervious parking to a minimum Use pervious parking if possible. Work with City staff on landscape plan. Add more oaks to the plan. Use native tree species. Buffer residents. Use City lighting standards. Motion: By Grundhoffer, second by O'Dea to approve with recommendations. All in favor. Motion carried. • Page 2 Certificate of Survey: Marshan Lake Industrial Park Property Description That pert of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, T.31, R.22, Anoka County Mimesotalying southeasterly of the eoutheaetuly line of sad Highway 35W, except that pan lying southeasterly of the centerline oflEghweyNo. 8, also known as Lake Drive, and except that part of the south 225 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying westerly of sold centerline and easterly of the west 538.56 feet thereof: and except the south 633 feet of the west 538.56 feet of said Northwest Quarter of Southwest Quarter. And that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, T.31,11.22, Anoka County Minnesota described se beginning at the southeast COMM of said Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter, thence North 01 degree, 03 minutes, 45 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the east lino thereof540.91 feet, theme South 85 degrees, 17 minutes, 07 seeonda West 268.25 feet, thence South 49 degrees, 06 minutes, 45 seconds West 323.15 feet thence South 39 degrees, 46 minutes, 14 seconds West 93.39 Rat; thence South 76 degrees, 30 minutes, 13 see m& West 236.61 teat to the east rtgbt.of -way line of Highway No. 35W; thence South 36 degrees, 03 minutes, 52 seconds West along said right -of- -way line 194.69 feetm the south line of said Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thmca South 88 degrees, 34 minutes, 42 seconds Past along said south line 905.97 Ret to the point of beginning. And that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, T.31, R.22, Anoka County Minnesota described as commencing at the southeast comer of said Northeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter; thence north along Ore east Tine thereof 633.01 Ru to the point of beginning; thence westerly, angle to right, 90 degrees, 19 mdnutes, 04 seconds 181.55 feat to the southeast lase of said Highway 35 W; thence northeasterly along said line 251.88 feet to the east line of said Northeast Qumtru of Southeast Quarto; thence south along said east San 175.46 feet to the point ofbegbming. All subject to reservations, reatdcdona, and easements of record . Total Net Area – 30.60 Ao. W 1/4 COR SEC 17 01M 268.25 en JIP / /4+/ // '*/ r/ / / .'it /rr' Alts �Soufh Una of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4, Sec 17. S8834'42'E Caa 801.87 / / 0 t ' Drainage and Ut11ty Easement rj 0' GRAPHIC SCALE )1685 Coble Line :'t ^ ♦T tea b Ile xm (IN 166ET) 1 mon - 100 ft 720.12 S8a'40'12'E Flb.r Out. Owner /Developer Glenn and Myrna Rehbein 18 Wildflower Place North Oaks, MN 55127 gd».,1'C i t� / n l ♦ r 1 J / / / / / SE Cor, of SW1 /4 / of NW 1/4, See. 17. / l ` /` $105 D6../ fi / / / / / 10 / / /1 UNE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NE 31 OF SE Af, SEC 18, S w 538.58 457.82 N8848'02eW / / / / / / / _ _1 / / / " -000314 UNE OF SOUTN 225 F7. OF NW Y OF SW )(, SEC 17. Y UNE Need Zone Deeignatlon Per FEMA Map No 27008 0005A Dated: 8 -15 -78 Zone 'C' (except County Ditch which 1. Zoned 'Al O DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT O DEN01E8 SET IP • DENOTES FOUND P 1' CONTOUR INTERVAL N01N VERTICAL DATUM ANOKA COUNTY 000RONATE SYSTEM .rye DENOTES HYDRANT (O DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE sari -ail DENOTES POSER POLE ■® x000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. DENOTES CONTOUR 0 — DENOTES 0051100 UNDERGROUND OAS LINE - -m -09— DENOTES 0051100 SANITARY SEWER. rri - 11, -' - -1L -- DENOTES 0OS11N0 UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNE east -811 -- DENOTES 1)051100 WATERWAN. I hereby certify that thta survey, plan or report won prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Data Reglatratlon No. 18213 GLENN EHBEI N COMPANIES 8811 NAPLES St Mt nN 78 �, i PAX (UV 78H001 • Preliminary Plat of: Marshan Lake Industrial Park Property Description That pert of the Northwest Quarter ofthe Southwest Quarter of Section 17, T.31, R22, Anoint County, Monaca lying southeasterly of W southeotaly line of said IHghwny 35W, except that pert lying wutheulmly of the centerline of Highway No. 8, also lmowo as Lake Drive, and except that pet of the south 225 fat of maid Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying westerly of Said centerline and easMrly of the west 538.56 feet thereo4 and except the south 633 fat of the wed 538.56 feat of said Northwest Quarter of Southwest Quarter. And that pet of the Southwest Quarts of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, T.31, 8.22, Anoka County Minnesota described as beginning at the eoulheaet comer of said Southwest Quarter of Northward Quarter, thence Nord 101 degree, 03 mrmutse, 45 monde Hest, assumed bearing, along the net line thereof 540.91 feet thence South 85 degrees, 17 minutes, 07 meads Wed 268.25 feet thence South 49 degrees, 06 minutes, 45 seconds Wee 323.15 fat thence South 39 degrees, 46 minutes, 14 seconds West 93.39 feet thence South 76 degrees, 30 minutes, 13 seconds West 236.61 feet to the east right-of -way lice of O0ghway No. 35W; thence South 36 degrees, 03 minutes, 52 seconds West along said right-of- -wry line 194.69 feet to the south line of said Southwest Quarter ofNmthweet Quarter, thence South 88 degrees, 34 minutes, 42 seconds East along said south fine 905.97 feet to the point of beginning. And that pert of the Northeast QuMa of the Southeest Quarter of Section 18, T.31, R.22, Anoka County Minnesota described u commencing at the southeast weer of aid Northeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter; thence north along the east fine thereof 633.01 feet to the point of beginning; thence westerly, angle to right, 90 degrees, 19 mimdes, 04 seconds 181.55 fat to the southeast line of said l0ghway 35 W; thence northeasterly along said line 251.88 feet to the eat line of midNortheast Quarter of Southeast Quarter; thence south along said cut line 175.46 feet to the point of beginning. AU abject to reservations, sanctions, and easements of record .. Total Net Area - 30.60 Ac. VICINITY MAP SECTION 17 & 18, MP 31, ROE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA Owner /Developer Glenn and Myma Rehbetn 18 Wildflower Place North Oaks, MN 55127 7, I/ fence / W 1/4 COR SEC 17 CN Os- \ ♦ ♦\ 4 ay r;•,rY // / /!/ �/\ PC °r �' .rA r r / / 1, -". err / ,.r beef r // .. i sit •. r // err / / rk/ gu _ .Cl \ \ c. c r' �r / j -- // r I o'' 1 k \S i -• / \ 1 \i \1111 _t ! area �` fit\ is \ \1 i \1`.,j �I ' r von4 \ 1 \ i 1 /j t `� 'II11 j- � S ' \ 11ts1 I 9e21 \ s tk111 s / Sean tine of SW 1/4 of IjW-1� Seat" j 1 \ 1 i \ S8834'4YE doses 005.3 i -- }w i i # �t 1 j�.,_ L. \ \ \ 1. ■ J \ f I. \ 1 el. 7 / / SE Cor. of 5W 1/4 of NW 1/4, Sea 17. 2 \ J 4 ! a/~ .7e 1 NDY UNE / Coble tine 5C 105 1720.12 588"4912-E / teal / ` ffr / / 7P°1 / ! s \ /! bas. \•, 538.C6 ,r GRAPHIC SCALE a m car (118 FREE) 1 kerb - 100 ft �SOU1HFAST ._._._ CORNER 09 NE 1/4 09 5E 1/4, SEC. 18. t G r 0 P ' ti I 6 ft. chelnlMk fence Setbacks from streets Local street 30Ft. Collector or Arterkl street 6097. Parking Lot/Driveway 15Ft. Rear ycrd Pendpd Map 1591. Parkin Lot Eft. 3de yard Principal Bolding 1098. Patine Lot 5Ft. 457.82 • N8848'02'W (/ .. / ORTH LINE OF S011N 225 FL CF NW 1i yr SW .1 / r / / / / / / / / / / / _J / / I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my dined supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surwyer under the laws of the Stab of Minnesota Dat.L Regletratlon No. 18213 Total Upland Area - 28.1 Ae. Zonl,9. Ught Industrial Flood Zone Duynofon Per FEIIA Mop No 27008 0005A Dated: 8.15 -78 Zone '0^ (except County Ditch ebW, le Zoned 'Al O DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT. O DENOTES SET IP • DENOTES FOUND P r CONTOUR INTERVAL NOM VERTICAL DATUM ANCRA COUNTY COORDINATE MIDI - 0 -0 - -e5 - 1111 -NM- SR- n DENOTES HYDRANT DEN01E5 SANITARY MANHOLE OEN0158 POWER POLE DENOTES DOMINO ELEVATION. D E401ES CONTOUR OE)101ES 0)051810 UNDERGROUND CAS LINE DENOTES 0091110 SANITARY SEWER. OENO1ES 10051810 UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 108:. D ENOTES EASING IYASERWAIN. i GLENN EHBE/ N COMPANIES IAA 8657 184PLF5 Sr. NE BLAME, 65Y )N 25446 -6724 fvoalk ., (76.8.) X6007 • • Marshan Labe W 1/4 COR SEC 17 194 0 ndustrial Park / ". / /"." J / / /13 8 5. sh0Nik1k 27r tot p 2°91 ` to\ '�( \r jr 3. . 2055 / L3 1 `` t \ t 2f 1049/ 1054// � S< t1 \ \\ 2045 // ,J \ O` 1, 1111 •- I 11 20x 1 9x13 �� k smij 'ti 1111��i21 \ 1 I sou South LM of SW 1/4 S88'34'42'5 390p,4T 1t'"`� 1 —� -Tenn 1 I 1 ' \3141 900. f r t 90— / '4 4-F SE Ca. of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4, Sec 17. rI /• A /.; / XNI -14-2 ......... eons / •■ �// ( G 2219 ape / ` i 1 554. A_ /Mil ` \ 909.2 7 i 5 '.. ." 909 /*1214 ti\ LL ! t ta r (720.12 L 1, 588'43'12 "E LAVE •) 9004 i 1 / 949g =r. 1 ( \ 221214 � ] w 22(2 1! {/ 1°s • / r MAR SOUTHEAST CORNER -SEX z 538.56 6 P fen ce a -- fence 11823 18211 1904 iuzo BBB 1900 1872 1874 1278 14x.4 1873 1875 iMI 988 1925 1988 1923 1 1910 14aa 1 1yBiT '900. - -- � 1889 1 `1.i_... 7908 Lam L '•�"1189 . r-„ ? 457.82 3'188'48'02 "At \--mom UNE or scum 225 FT. OF NW 7 SW A / / / 1 / / / / / GRAPHIC SCALE ( DT 7867 ) 1 Inch 100 ft. Owner /Developer Glenn and Myrna Rehbein 18 Wildflower Place North Oaks, MN 55127 NOTE SEE SEPARATE SHEETS FOR TREE TYPES. FILE GOPy Flood Zone D.W9notIon Pr FERIA Mop No 27009 0005A Dotal: 9 -15-78 Zane 'C' (except County Dhoti ohlch M Zoned 'A') Q DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT 0 DENOTES SET S • DENOTES FOUND IP 1' CONTOUR INTERVAL NOVO VERTICAL DATUM ANOKA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM aqo DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE -3 DENOTES POWER POLE 400,0 DENOTES 005RNG ELM/4110H. DENOTES CONTOUR DE1101E5 E7051540 UNDERGROUND GAS UNE DENOTES 0521150 SANITARY SEWER. 00401E5 0051190 UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNE Wu— DENOTES 0051NG WATERWAN. 0 - -0 — SS 55- A 11. i ECF JUL 14 2003 CITY OF LINO 4/HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ` SURVEY. PLAN DR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA MATHEW T. KYTONEN TARE REG. 140.1R712 / % S AN TKCHECKED DATE 07/11/2003 VERTICAL SCALE H0RIZ, 1':100 JOB NO. 03503 BOOT( PAGE OF SHEET 6 7 SHEETS c O O — U cn LLJ O� �c°n • —Q_ O +-�Uz D—J z_ Z N C = CCI Y L• '7 O OZJ 1 — Z W Z F—�• J / DRAWN SNS TK ECKED DAZE 07/11/2003 VERTICAL SCALE JOB N0. 03503 BOOK PAGE SHEET 7 OF 7 SHEETS Marshan Lake W 1/4 OM SEC 17 OM ndustrial Park OF -gTCH: : '. z, pe 2.� ,� , t' IIIII es,74 �3�1�; 1 Tay, i�i1 /1 94+. j- c8' / l/ht;/ a 8: / iv e � 111/i1liId, K '''....44' 0114 ! 1.,,,, 4. /Nil i■ifi: . 1 I O IP A 111 Iti). , ` 11 Lim .....O� IIi1. ,� , / ; . ,� / / , t[I / / 25/ / / P 62 1}@5.0 SE Co,. of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4, See. 17. 41O6, ._4L/ . / POND 4P �, / / NWL:895.00 HWL:896 .L,� /— — ._ BW:890.00 /,, / u1».. / 9 /6 to / / 'x' 15— \ �tp We 1\ \ •(�•O W am-- \` �$fJg I1oN /\ 4 �\ \ ▪ -,1 /� 1o72 \ / Wen 4 A. 1 '/— M \ 1 Coble Una N 0 1720.12 ew S88'49'12 "E .654 / /,rte, ' ti / � � .r� *IC/ / / l \ / /\ L „....9—„, \ 2 261 t/ X13'- /• -_.....— ft.t Z 897.7 9 0 0 to SOUIHEAST CORNER OF NE — AS 538.56 804 1902 — p .989 18900 ;57/2131,73 4 1878 Va.4 1925 2q4� 1988 1875 ]. 808 .11• 74927-5W—j .899 1923 7517: 870 jt( 1910 $f �; / _c4@ u`ee�li/ air s -ee.,. ,•� 270 457.82 N88'48'02 "W ORTH UNE OF SOUTH 225 FT. OF NW K pF / / / / / • 23 1821,) 1118i988° 6 ft ch0,Ilnk fence / / / 7 SW J( / / / NOY UNE / / GRAPHIC SCALE (081'1) L non . 108 a Owner /Develo er Glenn and Myrna Rehbein 18 Wildflower Place North Oaks, MN 55127 FILE CGpy JUL 11:0 2003 NOTE SEE SEPARATE SHEETS FOR TREE TYPES. Flood Zone D•pnoean Pr FEMA Mop No 27009 0005A Mod 9 -15-75 Zone •C (. wpt Canty DRM onion Y 196.4 "Al .000.0 0 015101E5 ANOKA COUNTY CAST RON MONUMENT o DENOTES SET IP • DENOTES FOUND IP 1' CONTOUR INTERVAL NM VERTICAL DATUM ANOKA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM 89 — M1— DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE D ENOTES POWER POLE DENOTES COSTN0 ELEVATION. D ENOTES CONTOUR DENOTES EOSI810 UNDERGROUND CAS UNE DENOTES EOSI1740 SANITARY SETTER. DENOTES EOSIRO 9810QSROUN0 TELEPHONE .NE D EN01E5 DOSING WATERWUN. /1"11-ERERY CER11FY THAT 7415 ' OJRVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA MATHEW T. MONO. Nala7.1/ 411 MARSHAN LAKE INDUSTIAL PARK GRADING PLAN WRK WYrHIN THE CSAH 23 (COUNTY) RIGHT -OF -WAY WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIOId>S 4o ,ANf )KA C UNTY, INCLUDING ANY PERMITS AND FiESTORATION REQUIREMENTS. \ 9i / IRA OR SHALL ADHERE TO ANY REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 1 / ,RKI G HOURS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES / //pi/ // ra,, / l \ \ \ \ \tl) \/ l�j� %l / / / c / / �I�1�)Ij1', / • I- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a PROPOSED BUILDING FLOODPLAIN FILL z W a o 0 Z O t-a L) V � wZWA 0 E4 E, warn, � 1 C) 00 1 0) I ui 0) 1 031 x z 0 a E, 0 EE Z 0 Ey Ey V to zE 44410 0E'+ Hawaa g°w w- - ,90\� — 1 C_ t 11 O / 1 1 01 1 '01 1 IN 1 1 , 1 1 , 1 1 / 1 4 \ 1 / 1 t \\ Q \ \ \g a1 I WvJ S \ t �C \ \\ \ \ \ o\ \\ \- \ \. \1 I '9 1 RIGHT TURN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPEGFlCA71oN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LANS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA W.A.T. MCCULLY \OAIE: ?EG. 910.2„j1 / 1 5! IE FILE CO < 111)-1- t.)- 0 -1 W;%20p <wm w i wzz 2 < OFWO<f aZM~v►ow a -FLU a -In Q W fX Z < < g zOtnwJaz oco ZQwo<wm o- wo=rmo a 6 —I N d <0Q <JO w In0 N1XzCtee�a o vw Pzpa3OWZ I! WW PwozG3c FF �- ¢LLii. o1-ozzo a= � PJa2N =W d ZO wOj UDC Oa U M :f WATM WATM DATE 7/11/2003 VERTICAL SCALE 1IO W, JOB NO. 03503 BOOK PAGE SHEET 2 \ of 7 SHEETS MARSHAN LAKE INDUSTIAL PARK UTILITY PLAN WORK WITHIN THE CSAH 23 (COUNTY) RIGHT -OF -WAY WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF ANOKA COUNTY, INCLUDING ANY PERMITS AND RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ANY REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND WORKING HOURS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES k:N UTILITY NOTES ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE 8" PVC SDR 35 CASING MAY BE REQUIRED UNDER LAKE DRIVE ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE 8" PVC SCH 40 ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE 8" DIP CL52 DIRECTIONAL BORE SECTION CAN BE C900 PVC SEPARATE DOMESTIC WATER FROM FIRE FLOW SERVICE AT THE BUILDING WATERMAIN TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8' OF COVER SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN CROSSINGS TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION LINO LAKE UTILITY SUPT. MUST BE CONTACTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO UTILITY WORK, WORK IN ROW OR UTILITY CONNECTIONS SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF LINO LAKES, CEAM, MDH AND MPCA EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING U1IUTIES, BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE OR SHE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA (651) 454 -0002 MN TOLL FREE 1- 800 - 252 -1166 PARKING LOT PAVEMENT DESIGN VILE iort 1.5" BIT. WEAR TYPE 41 2" BIT. BASE TYPE 31 12" CLV RECYCLED GRC FIELD # 4. 2053 Cl if (HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THI\ PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISOR AND THAT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA W.A.T. MCCULLY �pAjE; RE 3. NO.Z31.$ / Z O U Cr) o_� WATM WCHECKED RATE 07/11/2003 VERTICAL SCALE yORIZ, N.A. 1 :60 JOB NO. 03503 BOOK PAGE SHEET 4 / \ etc 7 cwcnc w PANA ON Si -E PL / ���,� \ / // ,- - = SITE PLAN NOTES / \ SLIT POND 4P NWL:895.00 HWL:896.47 BOT:890.00 Drive Driveway 3 / POND 5P �'t \ 100 HWL :8 e .�0 OJQ 100 wL:s7._. \\\ \� S G� BOT:891.� 1 \� 1 1997 Uniform Building Code 1998 MSBC CABO /ANSI A117.1 -1992 1999 Minnesota Energy Code Building Classification A. Occupancy B. Type of Construction C. Location on Property D. Allowable Floor Area Buildings Main Building: 250,524sf Office: 15.000sf Total: 265,524sf JUL 1 4 2003 ci Y E. Height: No building in the LI District shall be erected or structurally altered to exceed forty —five (45) feet in height. Site Data City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance 586,311sf/13.46ac site 173,369sf/3.98ac =30% green space (more than 25% required) Setbacks from streets Local street 30 ft Collector or Arterial Street 50 ft Parking lot/ Driveway 15 ft Rear yard Principal Building 15 ft Parking lot 5 ft Side yard Principal Building 10 ft Parking lot 5 ft From residential district 75 ft Parking Spaces FILE COPY 15,000 sf office Three (3) spaces plus at least one (1) space for each two hundred (200) square feet of floor area Required = 3 +75 =78 Designed = 78 250,524 sf warehousing One (1) space for each two thousand (2,000) square feet of floor area and one (1) space for each company owned truck (if not stored in building) Required = 125 Designed = 130 9 ft wide x 18 ft long stall 24 ft wide two way aisle Maximum slope driveway/ access: 8 ft. rise in 100 horizontal All elevations are flowline elevations unless noted otherwise WORK WITHIN THE CSAH 23 (COUNTY) RIGHT —OF —WAY WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF ANOKA COUNTY, INCLUDING ANY PERMITS AND RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ANY REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND WORKING HOURS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERNSION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA W.A.T. McCUU.Y DRAWN WATM WATM 7/11 2003 VETMCAL SCALE IIOWIZ; .108 NO. 03503 BOOK PAGE SHEET 1 1\ of 7 SHEETS 5 ri O /.' J OUTLOTC 6.401143183 OUTLOT A 3.87 ACRES / / / / ■ \.-./ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 1 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / // / / / / // / 1 / / / / / / / / / / % / L RW(30'IETMd0 ,,\ WETLAND A 538.56 OUT LOT B 5.93 ACRES TABULATION: SITE AREA: BUILDING: OFFICE AREA: WAREHOUSE AREA: TOTAL: PERVIOUS AREA PARKING REQUIRED: PARKING PROVIDED: TOTAL DOCKS AVAILABLE: 13.47 ACRES 249,400 S.F. 15,800 S.F. 285,000 S.F. 328 ACRES ( 24% OF SITE ) 203 CARS 210 CARS 30 EXTERIOR 2 DRIVE -INS SITE PLAN 0 50 100 200 Et FILE cori JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF Ell o L ,. =E , H E I T M A N A R C H I T E C T S I N C O R P O R A T E • 555 PEACE ROAD, SUITE lOS ITASCA,ILLINOIS 60143 TEL 630.778.3551 FA 630.777.3599 • Build -to -Suit Lino Lakes, Minnesota DEVELOPER III PANATTO NI NNEfT13A S RI RAH O 001 07 -0-03 .aONIIf NUMBER NOW WM= P -1 57-0' Cr) eZ-0' 57-0' lc CP jf 57-0' 57-0' 57-0' 9 57-0' SZ-0. 9 1 c)4 67-0r 57-0' Cr) Cr) 57-0' :L -a —a-- • II • • • 11 • • • • II II II • II II • II II • • 111 II • • 57-0' 57-0' 52-0• 158,0' 57-0. 57-0' net-s• 67-0. 57-0' 57-0. WO" 56,-7 Oi lb ib oti c3 lb lb COMPOSITE FLOOR PLAN \ \ \ \ JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES I • HEITMAN ARCHITECTS INCORPORATED 555 POD POAD, 551E105 ITASCAILLI14015 0143 TEL: 630.773.3551 PAX: 690.779.3599 •04.1.3464 11••••/./*/*/ 11••••■••■■•...N1 IMm.I.A.eapm•I =W. 1.■•■ 11••■•../a,mys....••••■•1..m.1 powl*.i1•11 11•1•1/01•••■••••••■•■•■11.1.104 1104.0..•■•■•■•1•■■•1....■. • P2a ri[ECOp1 • Build-to-Suit Lino Lakes, Minnesota DEVELOPER PANATTON1 ISOM MI SHER TINA OM! PLAN DAM 075f56 PIMA= NULUNIPI 2054 OMR PIUMINIR A2.0 c OFFICE 15 -0"x23' -0" OFFICE 11'- 7'x15' -0" SUPPLY 1r- 7-x15'4- OFFICE 11'- 7"x15' -0" OFFICE 11- 5"x15' -0" OFFICE 11'- 7"x15' -0" OFFICE 15-0 "x22'7" SERVER 1r-3 x2 ' -7" FUN SHOP 12' -0"x15.3" HOUSEKEEPING 8'- 8x20' -0" V TELE. 12' -0"x153" SUPPLY IT-3 x21' -7" 7 FILENVORK ROOM — - — 12'- "x2r =to- 7 OFFICE 11' -0"x13'3" 7 OFFICE 11' -0"x13'4" OFFICE 11'- 7"x15 -0" OFFICE 11' -0'x13'3" c OFFICE 11.4-x13.43- OFFICE 11'- Tx1S -0" NDINO MICRO. MICRO. EEWC LUNCH 35'.'x41'48" ORDER PRINTING 15 -0"x17' -3 1 — CONR. 12' -01"x15 -0" CONF. 12'-11 "x1T -5" SUPPL 8'- 21'x1" -11" I OFFICE 12'- "x131-" I OFFICE 12'- 1"x13' -2" N V OFFICE 11'- 7"x155'' -0" OFFICE 11'- 7x15' -0" RECEIV'G 1T3"x15' -0" SHIPPING 15' -0"x15' -0" 0 V OFFICE 11' -7 "x15.0 OFFICE 11'- 5"x15 -0" 7 OFFICE 11'- 7"x15 -0" 7 OFFICE 13'-2"x15 -0" OFFICE 15' -0"x22' -7„ 5s-r 5r- 52,4r 0 0 sr- 1581 -. t-7 OFFICE FLOOR PLAN 118" 1' -0" SY ry�uv- M— w i JUL 1. ' 2003 1, CITY OF LINO _.A ,.a « 1 H E I T M A N A R C H I T E C T S IN C O R P O RAT -E D111111 555 PM ROAD, 5515 105 ITASCA.ILLINOIS 60143 1B. 630.773.3551 FAX: 630.773.3599 i =v�� Ws. Ww. ...OW mop e�rYl.i�. '""'"pr..l WiuWol.�wYw • Build -to -Suit Lino Lakes, Minnesota DEOnoSet tfii PANATTON I sHELTmLI err! PLAN Me O7/11/03 P110.1�1R NUMMER 203034 S1113Ef NUi.l5'!1 A2.1 46, T/PRECAST I' EL. 155'-0' T/SLAB '' EL. 100-0. 77PRECAST 'Lly EL. 135'-0' T/SLAB 'I' EL. 100-0. T/PRECAST EL. 135'-0. AL T/9LAB ,1" EL. 100.-0" 0 • 9 9 09 Qs c.) WEST ELEVATION 1" = 30.-0" abk, T/PRECAST "if EL. IS5'-0" T/SLAB 4, EL. 10V-0' , 11111111111111/1/111 1•1111111111INI 1111111111111111111M SOUTH ELEVATION 1" = 30%0• C.) --:' 1=111111111111=1 7:11111111•111111111111111 .WP - IIMMIIIIIIIMII .- el.; 1111111•1111111•111 111M11111111111111,4 III= 1U111 IP' F1LE c)1 Q (Pi Q Q Qi -IR :3.51 F-4.1 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION c? sc), Pi cD1 L . I 4s9)". • 111•1•11 1" • 30'4" • tt ju\_. 4 2003 CITY OF LAKPQ, HEITMAN ARCHITECTS INCORPORATED 555 PBC5 WAD, 0510 05 ITASCAILLINOIS 60143 TEL: 630.773.3551 FAX :630.773.3599 Build-to-Suit Lino Lakes, Minnesota DEVELONA Iii PANATTON IBMS OATS SHEET IDLE SITE PLAN DATE 07/11103 OT NU 203034 SHEET NUMBel A5.0 11111111111111111111,. 1=11111111111111111, _ .0 — INIINIIIIIIINIII 11111111M1111111111114 11111101111•111111 , ,'-‘_.,- ,. - 11111111111MEI 'INI11111111•1111•1 .. ( ., 11111E11 MIME .. , .111111111111111111111111 , <-- 1111111111111111111.1-- 1111111111111M111111 --111111111111111111111111 WEST ELEVATION 1" = 30.-0" abk, T/PRECAST "if EL. IS5'-0" T/SLAB 4, EL. 10V-0' , 11111111111111/1/111 1•1111111111INI 1111111111111111111M SOUTH ELEVATION 1" = 30%0• C.) --:' 1=111111111111=1 7:11111111•111111111111111 .WP - IIMMIIIIIIIMII .- el.; 1111111•1111111•111 111M11111111111111,4 III= 1U111 IP' F1LE c)1 Q (Pi Q Q Qi -IR :3.51 F-4.1 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION c? sc), Pi cD1 L . I 4s9)". • 111•1•11 1" • 30'4" • tt ju\_. 4 2003 CITY OF LAKPQ, HEITMAN ARCHITECTS INCORPORATED 555 PBC5 WAD, 0510 05 ITASCAILLINOIS 60143 TEL: 630.773.3551 FAX :630.773.3599 Build-to-Suit Lino Lakes, Minnesota DEVELONA Iii PANATTON IBMS OATS SHEET IDLE SITE PLAN DATE 07/11103 OT NU 203034 SHEET NUMBel A5.0 u PANATTON4 FIXTURE SCHEDULE TWE LAWS MM.:WWI ZWWACIORER GATALOO NNDER SH9.DR69 91415N SCUMS S18MPo3 NO. CAT. NO. E 1 I4{4 Pr 008410R NHL BRACKET 151 OIRA 4001P5323271MBO4 18*H+H7 61.J65 SACK PLN.6. 9 1 )4440935 EXIER1OR HAIL BRACKET. UTHORIA IOSE2400TIPER42TD1304 TEI•PEPEO 61./a5 BLACK HM.I. E2 I !H40eP5 POLE < LIR911MRE LTINCN1A 281.15137 GU.% ILAQ SM DETAIL I FIXTURE TYPE 'E2' MOUNTINS DETAIL IQS • J s4: 59 935 es •a 734E 547716 40 a 5314 L: 15 j' 1.5 113 5P 148 1454 9141 615 148 !P• 144 72 591 145 la M 31 i..1!;. f1: 1142 4.67 al LR ?.: :6.•43112 13 J. 534 42 147,.12^14 ee 533 au ea 11 ra 12 32 161 a: VP J ✓. 414 115 12 214 93 aN 1414 f 'SD 32 451 w 34 235 1.2 - j / 4 yC )..5sv f1 C 7 . )7 14 -"� 2.1 66: In 4_ 535 ^55 31 .4, ▪ 4x 9/•(1 ml 40 .29./. . / JI / 14. 545 Jl4 466 !S as e5 714 Z?t f 1R 13 SW as aN 517 aT y5' / 11 514 44y 2.4 135 145 63 j2 ,,rr�. aG 524 9N 953' 433 437 Zu 4G/Nu..i'e 13 5147 7 351 am 1444!' 1G 5/'55 54 12 k, 4x *_3 l} 721 se 514 .5141 5344 E3✓ 62 3Ef4'41 141414 >'6 1 444 L51 • 67 A 11,143/414 a s 16 en' IA 645 O`. 121 "' la 365 Livia 455 ➢ 9C t+ PF 35 }Jx 1 T 145 1'4 E$ 9.92 v; - 4- ta,' 351 4 4s 3.5 1 PA AD 153' gM : 42 !E 21 44 T 644 51 3 I% 45 E. 355 512 !:1 3543 4/y443 5.44 5 'K 1435 41 1444 59 131 13- 455 es aP 531 as 4 \ ) 1453 iel 154 12. 4• - 4534 '13 5 - 9 .�a SR EN 6 A '- 1612.22 343 26 ry O U 153 5e9 Ls 12 1, .' 33. 61., 7S" 441 aC 2: 1344 " .72 635 '.J . .•• �. 4:14 44_4/' -, iY. 42 1 - -.. 3E1 .V .. 12 21 /722• Sy /:S .'444 434 544 t... E 55'•,444 ;le ' : da :: ti= •Pb' oi' 14 an ' 3441 :.. 2 �c f5 - :S:.v + ::1 see s `..5573 _ 148.14 534 .. 311 In 4.$ p;. 313 344 Tr/ 534 113 n\�, 1 * 10 I •Jb73 416 531 2E s1 >p!.• :Jt i_ w5• fi7: 41 763 ^G :n 45 4X IL• 52 714 am a9 t* .653 E4 tee ;es :4.1 141 e es A, 3d 6g L' eel 536 at 531 It4 ill 1 436 126 31 155 62 17 M141• 2: 11.642 A• A 2 147 I346 ZF 75 e57 514 17? 1? •.14 Zit H'1 37 531 .V. 42 3ffi jk 1437 :61 531 533' 19 40 46 21 414 12 34 164 143 13314:6 111 72 SS 734 Pt N2 14 tl :35 12 4135 531 4A so 156 4M :2 9'2 149 e 1415 14 3344 533 45 332 26 "S• 442 dk h. 22 73 161 0 133 4434 6D 4141 10 16.314 Sat 1455 114 •2 12 2 C 54' 1\12 513 _7 647'A. 314 2 IC 33 3 353 434 454 67! 4644 1P 214.473 4-13 12,14 4 143 ESA- 5'r %A 34 14+1 24 u: -' u^ fay - 'b! 144 2 74% 1212 2'J1.4/ 'R :2 1.7yi4 'X. n7 4s' 'a as ';) 537 any 144 sP 16a ,{s VI to 35 49 4.33 4P su we 3, L9 1413 'm 1• SS! . see er lee :C s. 7_ .- :]' A4 ". 14.,v'i- A, es Sk ere 4µ 435 17 135,2•' ss 1431 '43 d 133: en 734314 144 4141 D•- S: 115 e£ 0.2 ,3g. 154 4'6 I'a EA /5146 346 7147 117 556 15 S 41 75 516' I9 115 Ji7 471 26 N' 55 557 i£ AD I5 114 12 R4 aN 5:4 1145% 4P 437 33 2:45147 SK ` 6 5142 5 ` 532574• \ IE3135 42 Zz4 e4�' �F4 " 5p 31. 7� /354 54 531 a 73 1-P 114 '5:'5)/1514 19 435 iF Lit 111 114E :214/ 149 1£' a 147 116 LT /1 137 32 17 45? L 141 .* 141 10 - sus 15 1416 • 3:44 417 744 3P IN 413 414 CZ 131 14 2 12 1n 165 6343 12 534 :R .36 23/73 _4 . .13 55'4 DTI AZ AN ♦ l i'9 11 .4 54 •s 4457 4. - SI 6 143 114 14 12 L 4- •`14$214 91214 437 L 10 13 12 A '.. '. .2 iS .541 ..5 15 se la 474 Ls 414 L! L 3A 1# 1441 U 1N4r641152 •6 + N3 5' 2445k zse 33414 433 113 se Y3 133 441 141 42 1T a,/ 1E 414 U as :2,414 SO L3 442 4411 3 .. .4 35`3 444 472 .. 4? e0 42 3:9515 35 73S 735 I.F. tip 341 411 -. 37 50 in 4461 eY 12 to to 3a 314 LP a` 111%5. 13 3.: '.- 742 344453 ?A ▪ •X 7@ 19 12 .14 233 ,4E :A ! 1K 4434 7146 444 \ 435 as se 17 \ le 13,3 IS 321 CR 1435 - 223 IN 143! 3:. 3 144 as 313 144'431 A 151 V. • 4 LIGHTING ANALT56 !VIES. (PAR31245 AfS-446 QUO U AVERAEE F0051Jao112. 259 2116119.616002C220125, 053 5) 142.10981 EOOTCAIDL.ES. 7243 4) AVERAo 440.1 RATIO. 596 5) 143.33114H44104.SI RATIO. 9.96 ��.� ` ter•. ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 5138 3.604 r H E I T M A N A R C H I T E C T S I N C O R P O RATE D 255 THCE ROAD, 511E US ITASCAILLINOIS 5410 111. 630.173.3551 PAX 630.773.3599 .r.w.wr..r• aglWCll ENGINEERS NORNACII B ASSOCIATES, INC. 2835 S. Mmland bad New OVin,NSs n 53151 473074E 9621784339 FAX: (1621 7845014 ]+5335 I JUL142003 Build- to -Suj g c .F LI NO L 4 Lino Lakes, Minnesota NANO DAR SHEET TRW e.CTRICAL 617E PLAN DATE PNG.IeaT 34)41983 68044 814147 NAAfi91 El Y PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE TAIRS camoVaglar.a TOUWS " R ©EWrJT'"NE0 MAWS U1WO . IP"Irratea"44 hr. a or a' Woe roux W WOW ewn m eAMIWW4 .w r of 0m0 wm MI W WOW A.,__, 5W T. GE 0100 - Pa =ila 4 W YO. 1UW0 WOW P5 SOEP N W r WOO RO 0 !e 2.' �Sati .M M W C 010W WOW ° Rirr O W r WOO S 01 W y�.a.. ■ m 1-1yr u . 0W0 "E a0 • w OR 1e W 2-vr cA. woe "me WW1 WE WT L. /1111•11131ZWII/IP 1:1=_00■ � ©EWrJT'"NE0 ®N's ^fit 1110 ®a.>I CU yam® MI COWORWIEWCAL Mr WWW Dff � PM �"a*, MN MRS 0 WREST 1 WA LENA PRET TO MO P ATES OTT STARTED RED SPOWEATOW PATE MO W NW MRS AS SPECIFIC ▪ WO LAFS "era 405 FOR AMA . WEST ISAR LERL TO EDGE OF POE RYER 70 WO WES CRY STOMOARe WED weancrams BROARCAST RATE A00 ARON PARS AS "cV0 MWO WM E 4m WrW AAA SW ea FOR *SA WNW WOW WO WNW POREER AMAS 1.6 WOW w m o 1° rr I'p STREARD sww AT A ERIE WO Swap SAW AS 4 ECRED IN MO WOW SEED SPECS MOIN Au WISE SUS 010 MO WOES W L sE aRlelm 0 "E OF WARM OREN YO WA ECOTYPE. DRAWING LEGEND SEED MM 52 n SEED 015 51 n SEED MIX: 53 SOD F•l DRESSER TRM ROCK NULCH, 2' -4' SIZE OVER UNDSCME FN3RK: GO 0 SHRUBS TREES— DECIDUOUS AND COMFEROUS TREES— UNDERSTORY METAL EDGING KEYNOTE LEGEND O1 COORDINATE EXTENT OF SEEDING WITH OWNER 02 VERIFY WENT OF DISTURBED AREA, SEED TO 'MIS P0047 03 5000E0 AREA STEEL EDGING NOTES 1. ALL SHRUBS BEDS AND PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 3' HARDWOOD MULCH. ALTERNATES tILt 2. ALL PUNTING BEDS AND SODDED TURF AROUND PERIMETER OF BUILDING MD IN ISLANDS SHALL DE IRRIGATED. 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE 4' BLACK DIRT TOP SOIL AND TILLED TO A DEPTH OF 7 4. IF A DISCREPANCY 15 DISCOVERED BETWEEN PLANT OUANOTIES IN SCHEDULE AND THE PLAN, QUANTITY. SHOWN ON PLAN SHALL GOVERN. PANATTONNI CONCEPT SITE Glenn Rehbein Companies Lino Lakes, MN op Y JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OP LE N° 3 4fr 'i MTFRNATF 01 (DEDUCT) ELIMINATE ALL STEEL EDGING MD ROCK MULCH MOUND PERIMETER OF BUILDING. AI RNA ! (DEDUCT) ELIMINATE CRIMSON FROST TREES FROM NE AND SW PLANTINGS ALTERNATE 05 (DEDUCT) REPLACE STEEL EDGING WI114 PLASTIC EDGING THAT HAS SIMILLAR AIM PROFILE (NOT ROUND TOP EDGE) DIMPLE 'SUPER —EDGE' BY OLY—OLA SALES, INC. N 1FRNATE 04 (DEDUCT): ELIMINATE SOO BAND MOUND PERIMETER OF FAKING AREA REPLACE WITH NATIVE SEED. AREA TO BE MOWED TN 5' BAND ONCE ESTABUSHED. ALTERNATE 15 (DEDUCT): REDUCE SIZE OF ALL PERENNIALS FROM 2 GALLON POT TO 1 GALLON POTS. NAIWAAAMA WWWWWww S 490:mN aEx SW SOO ▪ ea1MA14 FAX WW47e16 CRY SUBMITTAL ARev,mon flab • I hereby certify that this plon, specification or Mort was p epared by me under my direct supervision and that I Lao duly registered ndscape Architect under the bee of the state of Minnesatd. Registrotion Number. 15602 LANDSCAPE PLAN p07E; JULY 14,2003 SCALE: 1 PROJECT NUMBER: 2130.001 DRAWN: KMA L1 cer.ee e..e_ a... eei re** be. ,/ • Z' ■ \t'e/ • • �\ vv' �vvvvv vvvvv ,, /40,111:0g • V VV vv vv vvv vvv• vv• oov• vvvv / •vvv \\ • , moo cm Imir vV vvvv ovvvvv vvovv' ,vvvv vvvv, vvv • 1 • 1 • • • 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ° 2.5. '4a,♦ + PIA + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + •� DRAWING LEGEND r'- "i SEED MIX: 52 SEED MIX: 51 SEED MIX: 53 S DRESSER TRAP ROCK MULCH. Y -4' 5120. OVER LANDSCAPE FABRIC (DO SHTtUBS TREES — DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS Q TREES- UNDERSTORY METAL EDGING KEYNOTE LEGEND 07 COORDINATE EXTENT OF SEEDING WITH OWNER 02 VERIFY EXTENT OF DISTURBED AREA, SEED TO THIS P01NT SODDED. AREA 04 STEEL EDGING NOTES 1. ALL SHRUBS BEDS AND PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL RECENE 3' RARDW'OOD MULCH. JUL OF LIN PANATTONNI CONCEPT SITE Glenn Rehbein Companies Lino Lakes, MN 2003 L; FILE COPY ALTERNATES 2. ALL PLANTING BEDS MID SODDED TURF MOUND PERIMETER OF BUILDING AND IN ISLANDS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECENE 4' BLACK DIRT TOP 501L AND TRIED TO A DEPTH OF 7 4. IF A DISCREPANCY IS DISCOVERED BETWEEN PLANT QUANTITIES RJ SCHEDULE AND THE PLAN, QUANTITY SHOWN ON PLAN SHALL GOVERN. AId0RNATE 11 (DEDUCT) EUMINATE ALL STEEL EDGING AND ROCK MULCH AROUND PERIMETER OF BUILDING. ALTERNATE /2 (DEDUCT) EUMINATE CRIMSON FROST TREES FROM NE AND SW PLANTINGS ALTERNATE 93 (DEDUCT) REPLACE STEEL EDGING WITH PLASTIC EDGING THAT HAS 51MILWt SUM PROFILE (NOT ROUND TOP EDGE) EXAMPLE 'SUPER —EDGE' BY OLY —OIA SALES. INC. ALTERNATE 44 (DEDUCT). EUMINATE SOD BAND MOUND PERIMLER OF PAKING AREA REPLACE WITH NATNE SEED. AREA TO BE MOWED IN 5' BAND ONCE ESTABLISHED. ALIOtlATE./S (DEDUCT): REDUCE SIZE OF ALL PERENNIALS FROM 2 GALLON POT TO 1 GALLON POTS. IE,M MN WEE 2011 1111.10■011,11M .01 TM. OIL.159.11.111 51/1' SUBMITTAL ARevision Dote 1 h.r.by cerhly that this report specification . deer m erect ap .iwn and that Y am a duly Landscape Architect under Ms taws of the elate of Minnesota. Registration Number: 18862 ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLAN PATE JULY 14,2003 SCALE: 1 •..10' mammy 410418E10 2130.001 PRAWN: KMA L1.1 oo,nrn ..,. sees r ...n.. .. I111;:-'--- vED JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES i 0 TYPICAL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING SCALE NTS TnfElCift OF ROOTRALL 0.010174 Of ROOTEIALL TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING MPICIP.) WWII OVER SIX SEPARATOR 11A7 CREATE sux. W/TOPSOR 7LIRE SC., EDGES 00 11(110010 1104E 1:1 RATIO Of PLVOlfG SOIL 'OMNI NEARLY TAMPED WNW SOIL lINDETORBED EARTH OR COMPACTED BACKFIL RUER TO PIM FOR EATON, Of PLANTING NAP SCALE: NTS I 19 0 0 0 0 L00000 0 0 0 0 0 () TYPICAL PERENNIAL PLANTING SCALE: NTS NOT USED IRECH-YARIO SEE PLAN GROUNOCOY7 PLANTINGS SOIL SEP. FABRIC PUNTING SOIL SCARIFY CGSTING SOIL LAYER UNNSTURBED EARTH OR COMPACTED DACKFILL 28:01: SPACING UNIIES SEE PUNT MATERIALS SCHEDULE SCALE, NA 0 TYPICAL CONIFER PLANTING scALE: NTS NOT USED MASH OF TOPMNL & PLANTRAD SOIL SCARef EDGES OF PlAIDDID 1.101.1 10115000 411511 lAWA 4000110 100050 CRAM BOTTOM Of PIT 70 CCU= 00005 00110 AT PIDOMEIER URDISOIRRED EARTH CR COMPACTED RACKFILL SCALE: NA MINIXONO111101111111■1 PANATTONNI CONCEPT SITE Glenn Rehbein Companies Lino Lakes, MN FILEg CITY SUBMITTAL P Revision Date I hereby certify that this plan, spedfication of nsPart was prepared by rne our under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Landscape Architect under the Ione of the state of Minnesota. Registrotion Number 18E42 LANDSCAPE DETAILS DATE: 0544: JULY 14,2003 AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER: 2130.001 DRAWN: KMA L2 0 Coopoom Noma oolund onl Mow.. Is ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to preparers: This form is available at www.mnplan.state.mn.us. EAW Guidelines will be available in Spring 1999 at the web site. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for — but should not complete — the final worksheet. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The complete question as well as the answer must be included if the EAW is prepared electronically. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30 -day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title Lakes Business Park 2. Proposer Glenn Rehbein Companies Contact person Mark Vargo Title Associate General Counsel Address 8651 Naples Street NE City, state, ZIP Blaine, MN 55449 Phone 763 - 784 -0657 Fax 763 - 784 -6001 E -mail mvargo @rehbein.com 4. Reason for EAW preparation (check one) EIS scoping X Mandatory EAW Proposer volunteered 3. RGU City of Lino Lakes Contact person Mike Grochala Title Community Development Director Address 600 Town Center Parkway City, state, ZIP Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Phone 651/464 -5562 Fax 651/982/2499 E -mail mgrochala @ci.lino - lakes.mn.us Citizen petition RGU discretion If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number 4410.4300 subpart 14.A(2) and subpart name 5. Project location County Anoka City/Township City of Lino Lakes Section W 1/2 Township 31N Range 22W Attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project; . (Figure 1) • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); (Figure 2) • Site plan showing all significant project and natural features. (Figures 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) 6. Description a. Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor. The proposed project consists of the development of a multi -phase business park . The first phase consists of the development of a 265,000 sq. ft. light industrial/warehouse facility. Subsequent phases will be built on 3 additional outlots. The total acreage is 31.2 acres. Lakes Business Park EAW – July 21, 2003 1 Lino Lakes, MN b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. The proposed project consists of development of one 13.4 acre parcel and future development of three outlots totaling 16.2 acres of a plat called the Lakes Business Park in Lino Lakes, Minnesota (Figure 4A). The initial development includes a 265,000 square foot building for light industrial/warehouse use. Development of the initial site will include construction of a street connection to Lake Drive (CSAH 23), extension of public and private utilities (sewer, water, gas, etc.), installation of storm water ponds and/or infiltration basins and site grading. In addition, a storm sewer system will be installed to replace an existing ditch that conveys drainage to Anoka County Ditch No. 10. A conservation easement will be secured along Anoka County Ditch No. 10 to preserve the integrity of the ditch within the boundaries of the property. The City of Lino Lakes anticipates future development of Outlets A, B, and C and as the RGU has included them in this EAW document. Development of the three outlets is expected to be for contemporary light industrial uses. Conceptual uses illustrated on Figure 4A are as follows: • Outlet A (3.9 acres) - -Light mfg., Office, Retail Sales and Service Establishment. • Outlet B (5.4 acres) -- Professional Offices • Outlet C (7.0 acres) -- Light mfg., Office, Retail Sales and Service Establishment. The conceptual uses shown are allowed in the LI, Light Industrial District of Lino Lakes. The identified uses are only three of 15 allowable uses in the LI district. Other permitted uses include building material sales, greenhouses, nurseries, warehousing, and distribution facilities. Street and utility improvements for the outlots will be installed with the initial phase of development. The Lakes Business Park has approximately 23 acres (1,002,520 square feet) of developable area with buildings, associated off -street parking and drive areas. For the 13.4 acre (586,753 square feet) parcel, approximately 9.83 acres (428,400 square feet) is developable. Non - developable areas include existing wetlands, Anoka County Ditch No. 10, and wooded buffer areas. Maximum buildout will result in 70. percent impervious coverage, which is less than the allowable threshold of maximum impervious coverage of 85 percent, as identified in the City's zoning ordinance. Initial site grading and construction is anticipated to begin in October 2003. Full development of the site is expected to be completed in 3 to 5 years. c. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of the project is to provide an additional area for light industrial use in the City of Lino Lakes. The City anticipates a number of benefits from development of the Lakes Business Park, including taxable benefits received by investing in new development, aesthetic improvements resulting from the build -out, and creation of approximately 500 jobs. The entire project will be carried out by a developer and not by a governmental unit. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 8 Lino Lakes, MN d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen? X Yes _No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. The proposed first phase of the development does not meet the threshold for a mandatory EAW, which, under Minnesota Rule 4410.4300, Subpart 14 is 300,000 square feet in a third class city having a population of 10,000 to 20,000. Future development of Outlots A, B, and C would exceed the threshold limits. The total buildout for the entire site, including the 13.4 acre initial development and conceptual buildouts of Outlots A,B, and C is 362,800 square feet. This is below the threshold of 500,000 square feet requiring a mandatory EIS for a third class city. The City of Lino Lakes will review future development of Outlots A, B, and C through guidance of its Comprehensive Land Use Plan, as well as its zoning ordinance. The City will also conduct an environmental review of future development phases through its Environmental Board. Several assumptions were made (described in Item 6b.) to measure the level of impact for a full - buildout. For the purpose of this document, a full buildout condition is the maximum development that each parcel will support based on performance standards identified for the LI, Light Industrial District. 1. Outlot A (3.9 acres) • Conceptual Building (Light Mfg. /Office/Retail Sales and Service Est.)- 19,200 sq. ft. Footprint - Two Stories: Lower Level 19,200 sq. ft. Upper Level 19,200 sq. ft. Total Conceptual Building Sq. Ft.: 38,400 • Off - Street Parking Requirements Conceptual Building -95 Minimal Parking Spaces Required: 51 parking spaces required for office area (9,600/200 +3 =51). 34 parking spaces required for retail sales /service establishment and storage area (5,000 sq. ft.- retails sales /service and 4,600 sq. ft storage). 10 parking spaces required for Light Mfg. Area (19,200 - -one space/2000 sq. ft. =10). • Total Impervious Surface Coverage In no event shall off -street parking places, structures of any type or other features cover more than 85 percent of the lot area resulting in less than 15 percent pervious landscaped area. - The Maximum Impervious Coverage Allowed - -85 Percent: 3.29 acres (143,312 square foot) Total Impervious Coverage (Includes conceptual buildings and parking/drive areas): 77,400 square feet or 46 percent impervious coverage. 19,200 square feet - -Light Mfg., Office, and Retail Sales and Service Est. 58,200 square feet-- Parking/Drive Area. 2. Outlot B (5.4 acres) • Conceptual Buildings (Professional Office) -Two buildings at 14,400 square feet. Total Footprint= 28,800 square feet. • Off - Street Parking Requirements Conceptual Profession Office Buildings - 150 Minimal Parking Spaces Required: - 75 parking spaces required for office area (14,400/200 +3 =75). - Two 14,400 square foot buildings = 150 total off -street parking areas Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 9 Lino Lakes, MN • Total Impervious Surface Coverage In no event shall off -street parking places, structures of any type or other features cover more than 85 percent of the lot area resulting in less than 15 percent pervious landscaped area. The Maximum Impervious Coverage Allowed - -85 Percent: 4.45 acres (193,842 square foot) Total Impervious Coverage: 82,800 - square feet or 36 percent impervious coverage. 28,800 square foot. -- Two Professional Office Buildings 54,000 square foot -- Parking/Drive Area 3. Outlot C (7.0 acres) • Conceptual Buildings (Light Mfg. /Office/Retail Sales and Service Est.)- 44,000 Square Foot Footprint - Lower Light Mfg level is 34,000 square feet. Upper Office level is 10,000 square feet. • Off - Street Parking Requirements Conceptual Light Mfg. /Office/Retail Sales and Service Est. -70 Minimal Parking Spaces Required: - 53 parking spaces required for office area (10,000/200 +3 =53). - 17 parking spaces required for Light Mfg. Area (34,000 - -one space/2000 sq. ft. =17). • Total Impervious Surface Coverage In no event shall off -street parking places, structures of any type or other features cover more than 85 percent of the lot area resulting in less than 15 percent pervious landscaped area. The Maximum Impervious Coverage Allowed - -85 Percent: 5.44 acres (236,966 sq. ft.) Total Impervious Coverage: .84,700-square feet or 32 percent impervious coverage. 34,000 sq. ft. -- Light Mfg., Office 40,700 sq. ft. -- Parking/Drive Area e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Project Magnitude Data Total project acreage 31.2 Number of residential units: unattached N/A attached N/A maximum units per building Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space): 362,800 sq. ft. Indicate areas of specific uses (in square feet): Office 52,018 sq. ft. Retail 5,000 sq. ft. Warehouse 4,600 sq. ft. Light industrial 301,182 sq. ft. Other commercial (specify) None Building height; If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings. Manufacturing None Other industrial None Institutional None Agricultural None Building heights will be limited to two stories. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 10 Lino Lakes, MN • • 8. Permits and approvals required. List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including . bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. Unit of government Local City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes Anoka County Anoka County Rice Creek Watershed District State MPCA MPCA Metropolitan Council MN Dept. of Health Mn/DOT Type of application EAW Approval Final Plat Approval Site Plan Approval Building Permit(s) Final Plat Approval Entrance Permit to CSAH 23 Erosion Control Plan Approval Sanitary Sewer Extension NPDES Construction Permit Sanitary Sewer Extension Watermain Extension Final Plat Review Status To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained To Be Obtained 9. Land use. Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. The existing site is undeveloped. The majority of the site is covered by brush/shrub /grassland with scattered areas of wooded cover. A County ditch borders the northern end of the site. A small area of wetlands exists on the southerly end of the property. The site is bounded by Interstate 35W on the west, Anoka County Ditch No. 10 on the north, scattered residential development and Lake Drive (CSAH 23) on the east, and a commercial business and open space on the south. The property is currently zoned LI, Light Industrial because of its proximity to I -35W and Lake Drive. Proposed use of the property is compatible with current zoning. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is being conducted for the site. The site does not appear to have any potential environmental hazards. 10. Cover types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) developed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) was used to complete an inventory of the natural resources at the site. The MLCCS inventory data was analyzed and synthesized (see Figure 3A). The cover types were placed in broader categories for comparing the pre and post effects as depicted below and illustrated in Figures 3B and 4B. Types 1 -8 wetlands Wooded/forest Brush/Grassland Cropland TOTAL Before 1.5 1.5 27.7 After 1.5 0.7 1.6 0 0 Lawn/landscaping Impervious surfaces Other (ponding) If Before and After totals are not equal, explain why: Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 11 Lino Lakes, MN Before 0 0.5 0 After 9.0 16.3 2.1 31.2 31.2 11. Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. Because the proposed development is in the vicinity of the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve, there is a variety of wildlife in proximity to the study area. However, according to the Wild Urban Interface Study completed by the City of Lino Lakes, the immediate site is not identified as a prime area for wildlife. Marshan Lake is located in the park and is approximately 0.15 miles east of the proposed development site. Wetlands, woodlands, and grasslands provide habitat and cover for many common species found in the area. The proposed development will have the opportunity to minimize impacts to the adjacent park and associated fish and wildlife. A conservation easement will be dedicated along the Anoka County Ditch No. 10 to preserve the integrity of the drainage corridor. The development site will include openspace and vegetative buffers between on -site wetlands to provide habitat for waterfowl, amphibians, reptiles, and upland wildlife species. The development will also incorporate storm water treatment best management practices (e.g. detention ponds, infiltration basins, vegetated swales) to minimize water quality impacts to Anoka County Ditch No. 10, which ultimately runs through the park. b. Are any state - listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? X Yes No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. A search of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program Database was recently completed (ERDB 20040011) and is attached in Appendix A. In summary, the letter concludes that there are four known occurrences of rare species or animal aggregation sites within the one -mile radius search site. The DNR requested that a botanical survey of the project area be conducted. The City of Lino Lakes is in the process of completing the requested survey work. 12. Physical impacts on water resources. Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration — dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment — of any surface waters such as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? X Yes _No If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the water resources affected are on the PWI: Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. An existing unnamed ditch that outlets to Anoka County Ditch No. 10 will be diverted into a proposed storm sewer to accommodate site grading. The new storm sewer will be routed through on -site holding ponds and/or infiltration basins. Lakes Business Park EAW – July 21, 2003 12 Lino Lakes, MN • 'A wetland delineation was completed in May 2003 by the developer of the proposed site. Type 2 wetlands (1.5 acres) were identified on the southern portion of the site. The proposed plan will not require the alteration of the wetlands on the site. In the event future development does encroach upon on -site wetlands, under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) acts as the LGU for wetland impacts. The RCWD will assume wetland alteration permit authority over any wetland impacts. Anoka County Ditch No. 10 will be preserved in its existing condition. 13. Water use. Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including dewatering)? X Yes _No If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected, changes to be made, and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit numbers, if known. Identify any existing and new wells on the site map. If there are no we lls known on site, explain methodology used to determine. The proposed development will be served by the existing municipal water supply and will not require any wells. .The installation of sanitary sewer, storm water systems, and watermains may require isolated dewatering in order to install the underground utilities. It is unknown at this time how much dewatering will be required. If substantial dewatering is required, the responsible party for the development will be required to obtain a permit from the DNR. Development of the site will require connection to the City of Lino Lakes' municipal water system. The municipal water system has a firm capacity of 5.135 million gallons per day. The average daily use is currently estimated to be 1.0 million gallons per day. It is estimated that, when fully developed, the project area will require an average of 34,000 gallons per day. 14. Water- related land use management district. Does any part of the project involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100 -year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? X Yes _No If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions. The very eastern portion of the site is located within the designated shoreland zoning district for Marshan Lake. The City has adopted a shoreland and a floodplain ordinance that regulates development within these designated areas. The DNR has approved these ordinances. The proposed development will be in compliance with the standards of these ordinances. 15. Water surface use. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? Yes X No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other uses. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 13 Lino Lakes, MN 16. Erosion and sedimentation. Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: acres 29.7 ; cubic yards 100,000. Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe any erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction. The proposed development site is characterized by fairly level topography. Anoka County Ditch No. 10 has side slopes approaching 12 %. Erosion will present a hazard in slope areas if soils are exposed and left bare during construction activities. The streambank area along the ditch will not be disturbed by construction. Construction of the project will disturb more than 1 acre of land and therefore will require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. A likely requirement of the NPDES permit is that a storm water runoff and erosion control plan must be prepared. The plan will include the collection and treatment of runoff through grass swales, temporary sediment basins, storm water detention ponds, silt fencing, and vegetative filter/buffer strips. Furthermore, City policies and standards for controlling erosion and sedimentation will be required. These standards are consistent with the MPCA Best Management Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas, the BWSR Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook, and the EPA Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP). Vegetative filter strips will be used around portions of the site to help control erosion. According to the Lino Lakes Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development, filter/buffer strips provide an important function in minimizing erosion, reducing direct runoff of stormwater into vulnerable ecological resources, and help sustain wildlife populations through suitable habitat. The City of Lino Lakes and the developer will continue to coordinate efforts with the Rice Creek Watershed District, MPCA, and the Lino Lakes Environmental Board to ensure potential runoff concerns are addressed. 17. Water quality: surface water runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe any stormwater pollution prevention plans. A storm water drainage system is proposed to be constructed within all the street improvements to convey runoff to proposed ponding areas and drainage swales. Favorable controls for road runoff, as well as those in adjoining property development, have been identified. The storm sewer and pond water quality and quantity controls will be coordinated in size with the needs of the proposed. development to provide required treatment and discharge rate control. The City of Lino Lakes has storm water policies and design standards that will need to be satisfied by the proposed development to reduce the introduction of pollutants to wetlands and the area waterbodies (i.e. Anoka County Ditch No. 10 and Marshan Lake). Furthermore, the storm water treatment system will need to incorporate standards and rules of the Rice Creek Watershed District that also governs surface water planning within the project area. The proposed treatment and retention system includes the creation of water quality ponds, vegetative filter strips, drainage swales, and infiltration basins. Before construction can proceed, both the City of Lino Lakes and Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) must issue permits to satisfy surface water runoff regulations. The rate and volume of surface water runoff will increase during storm events as additional impervious surface area is created by the construction of buildings and pavement areas. To address the anticipated increase in rate and volume of stormwater runoff, the development will incorporate storm water controls and green space areas to ensure post - development runoff rates will be maintained at regulated rates. To maximize pollutant removal efficiencies, the controls will be designed and constructed ,according to NURP, City of Lino Lakes, and Rice Creek Watershed District standards. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 14 Lino Lakes, MN • • • b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site; include major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving waters. Runoff from the site currently drains to Anoka County Ditch No.10 on the north end of the property and ultimately discharges to Marshan Lake. Following development of the proposed site, storm water will be treated through natural infiltration in open spaces or through a storm water treatment system that will meet National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) guidelines, City of Lino Lakes policies /criteria, and Rice Creek Watershed District rules. The proposed best management practices for on -site storm water treatment includes vegetated filter strips /swales, storm water detention ponds, and infiltration basins. Storm water rate control and treatment will occur prior to any storm water being discharged to receiving water bodies. 18. Water quality: wastewaters a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. Proposed uses include light manufacturing, office, retail sales and storage. The development site is zoned Li, Light Industrial where raw materials are generally shipped in and not produced. Therefore, generation of industrial wastewater is not anticipated. . Normal domestic wastewater /sewage will be generated from the site. The projected sewer flows are anticipated to be approximately 34,000 gallons per day. b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on -site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems. All wastewater will be discharged into the City's collection system, thereby avoiding any direct discharges to receiving water bodies. c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. It has been determined that the sanitary sewer flows generated by the proposed development will not exceed available capacity of the City of Lino Lakes and Metropolitan Council's sanitary sewer system. Improvements that will be necessary to include the construction of gravity sanitary sewer to serve the development. d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. Not applicable. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 15 Lino Lakes, MN 19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: 0 ft. minimum 12 ft. average to bedrock: 200 ft. minimum 200 ft. average Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. There are no known geologic site hazards to groundwater within the study area or in close proximity to the proposed site. b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. Based on information obtained from the Soil Survey of Anoka County, the following soil map units are contained within the project area and shown on Figure 5. Map Symbol Soil Map Name Drainage Class Iw AJD Isanti Fine Sandy Loam, 0 -2% slope Very Poorly Drained LnA Lino Loamy Fine Sand, 0 -4% slope Poorly Drained ZmA Zimmerman Fine Sand, 0 -2% slope Excessively Drained ZmB Zimmerman Fine Sand, 2 -6% slope Excessively Drained ZmC Zimmerman Fine Sand, 6 -12% slope Excessively Drained The combination of excessively drained soils and a relatively high groundwater table creates a substantial potential for groundwater contamination. The site will be connected to municipal sewer and water systems to eliminate two potential sources of contamination. At this time, proposed use of the site does not involve the use or generation of hazardous chemicals. If chemicals are to be stored on site, they will be stored either indoors or in self - contained facilities to eliminate the potential for spills and subsequent groundwater contamination. 20. Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan; describe how the project will be modified for recycling. If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments. There are no known hazardous wastes associated with the proposed development The City does not provide full solid waste collection services for residents and businesses in the community. Residents and businesses contract their solid waste removal needs with independent garbage haulers that are licensed by the City. b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. Proposed uses of the site include light industrial operations. Generally these types of uses do not produce or handle substantial amounts of hazardous materials. It is possible that some occupants may use or handle hazardous materials as part of their business. Any occupant which utilizes hazardous materials would be required to conform to all existing laws and regulations in place at the time of development. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 16 Lino Lakes, MN c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been conducted for the site. A copy of the report is available for review at Lino Lakes City Hall. 21. Traffic. Parking spaces added: 526. Existing spaces (if project involves expansion): None. Estimated total average daily traffic generated: 1,430. Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence: 224 trips at 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary: In the PM Peak Hour, it is anticipated that 56 vehicles will enter and 168 vehicles will exit from the entire site. One hundred nine (109) of the existing vehicles will turn left to travel northeast on Lake Drive. Fifty -nine (59) will turn right and travel southwest on Lake Drive. From Mn/DOT Traffic Volume Maps, average daily traffic on Lake Drive near Elm Street is 10,000 vehicles per day. It is estimated that there are 800 vehicles on Lake Drive in the PM Peak Hour with approximately 60 percent northbound. Vehicles turning right out of the development will have no problem finding gaps in traffic. Vehicles turning left will find some delays, especially if work hours at the proposed development release a significant number of employees at one time. However, delays will be on the access road to Lake Drive and will not impact traffic on Lake Drive. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impact on the regional transportation system: Traffic traveling south on Lake Drive can easily be absorbed into the capacity and traffic flow on the system. Traffic traveling north on Lake Drive will add an average of two vehicles per minute to the intersection operations through the I -35W interchange area. It is estimated that approximately 40 percent of the northbound traffic will turn left to go south on I -35W. Thirty percent will turn right to go north on I -35W and 30 percent will continue north on Lake Drive. With this distribution, the only noticeable impact will be northbound traffic traveling through the intersection with Town Center Parkway and then traveling through the south ramp intersection of I- 35W. With the high volume of traffic anticipated traveling to and from I -35W south and Lake Drive north, and with other more intense development in the area, improvements through the I -35W and Lake Drive interchange may be necessary for these developments and the improvements will accommodate the traffic from the Lakes Business Park without noticeable impacts. The additional volumes of traffic on I -35W or on Lake Drive north of I -35W will be extremely small compared to the existing and to the forecasted overall volumes. The only mitigation measure necessary will be a southbound right turn lane from Lake Drive to the development. A northbound left turn lane will be desirable in the future as volumes increase and Lake Drive is improved to the north. 22. Vehicle - related air emissions. Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EAW Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed. The Lakes Business Park development is not anticipated to have substantial impacts or cause any air quality related concerns. The forecasted traffic volumes generated by the site are lower than the volumes of traffic typically associated with carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations approaching state air quality standards. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 18 Lino Lakes, MN A detailed air emission analysis was not completed for this project. According to the Mn/DOT Hotspot Screening Method Flow Chart, the benchmark annual average daily traffic volumes (AADT) would not be reached nor does the proposed development site affect any of the MPCA monitored locations or top seven intersections in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Furthermore, the City of Lino Lakes does not expect the projected average annual daily traffic volume from the study area to increase any particular roadway by 10,000 vehicles per day within a ten year timeframe. 23. Stationary source air emissions. Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EAW Guidelines for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone - depleting chemicals (chloro- fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. None. 24. Odors, noise and dust. Will the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation? X Yes _ No If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) Construction related impacts such as dust, odors and noise have been considered. Some air pollution is expected to be generated during times of construction. These temporary impacts will be present only during construction. The only existing receptors that could experience impacts are those residences located immediately east of the site. Temporary construction impacts to these receptors are anticipated to be minimal. Following the complete build -out of site, air pollution will be generated by traffic moving along the local and regional street system. Dust is expected to be generated by on -site construction equipment during times of construction. Dust generation will be minimized by enforcing best management practices during construction along with any other applicable permits required by the City of Lino Lakes. Practices that may be enforced include: 1) minimizing the periods and extent of areas being exposed or graded; 2) watering construction areas and haul roads during periods of high winds or high levels of construction activity; 3) minimizing the use of vehicles on unpaved surfaces; and 4) covering and/or spraying material piles and truck loads. No substantial odor sources are expected within the proposed development site. The only sensitive noise receptors near the study area are existing residential properties located east of the proposed development site. While the proximity of these existing residences to the proposed site could be cause for concern, the associated increases in traffic volumes are not anticipated to cause a substantial change in noise levels. Traffic noise increases must be 3 decibels or greater in order to be detectable by the average human ear. A 3- decibel increase occurs when traffic volumes approximately double (100 percent increase). Because the traffic generated by the development would increase traffic volumes on Lake Drive (CSAH 23) by less than 10 percent, no discernible increase in noise would result. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 19 Lino Lakes, MN Noise mitigation is not proposed at this time. All City and County roads in the area are exempt from state noise standards. The only nearby road that is not exempt from State noise standards is I -35W. Noise levels along the local roadways are not anticipated to exceed State noise standards, nor are they anticipated to be greater than noise levels that are commonly experienced within a residential and commercial area. Furthermore, adequate building setbacks and acoustical site planning techniques could be further considered in the placement and arrangement of buildings to shield more sensitive land uses from noise impacts. 25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? X Yes _ No Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? _Yes X No Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? X Yes _No Scenic views and vistas? _Yes X No Other unique resources? _Yes X No If yes, describe the resource and identify any project - related impacts on the resource. Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. A preliminary archaeological assessment was completed on June 13, 2003 for the proposed site and is summarized below. • The archaeological assessment investigation revealed that the area has both a high and moderate potential for containing pre - contact archaeological resources. The area has undergone little or no modern disturbances, consisting of grass/brush areas with scattered tree cover. The exception to this are the backslopes to Interstate I -35W and CSAH 23. Areas of the study also contained marsh grasses indicating frequent inundation, but these were minimal. The backslopes to Interstate I -35W and CSAH 23 are areas that were disturbed by construction of those roads. They are considered to have low potential for post- contact archaeological resources. • Because no buildings or structures were known to have existed in the study area during the post- contact period, the study area is considered to have little or no potential for post contact archaeological resources. • A National Register eligible archaeological district is located just to the east of this property. • • The higher terrace in the eastern portion of the study area is part of a topographically prominent feature that overlooks and is within 500 feet of a substantial body of water, Marshan Lake. Also, because the study area is almost completely undisturbed, the portion of the terrace within the study area is considered to have high potential for intact precontact archeological resources. • The lower terrace is part of a terrace overlook adjacent to Marshan Lake and is undisturbed. It would typically be considered to have a high potential for intact archaeological resources. However, based on the height this terrace is in comparison to the higher terrace coupled with the further distance from Marshan Lake and from the stream to which the lake is connected, this portion of the study area is considered to have moderate potential for intact precontact archaeological resources. These findings were submitted to State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for their review and concurrence. A response letter dated July 11, 2003 from SHPO recommends that a survey of the area be completed because there is a good probability that unreported archaeological properties might be present in the project area (see Appendix B). The letter further states that if the project area can be documented as previously disturbed or previously surveyed, the need for a survey would be re- evaluated. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 20 Lino Lakes, MN 26. Visual impacts. Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks? _Yes X No If yes, explain. 27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations. Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a Local, regional, state or federal agency? X Yes _No. If yes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will be resolved. If no, explain. The development is subject to the policies and recommendations set forth in the following plans: • City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan » Land Use Plan Sanitary Sewer Plan Transportation Plan Surface Water Management Plan • City of Lino Lakes Subdivision and Platting Ordinance • City of Lino Lakes Shoreland Zoning Ordinance • Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Plan The City of Lino Lakes has an existing comprehensive plan, which includes a land use plan and several other planning elements. The City also has a surface water management plan that must be consistent with the larger plan for the Rice Creek Watershed District. The proposed project will be reviewed for consistency with the surface water management policies. The City will continue to work with the Watershed District to ensure compliance with all policies. To varying degrees, the proposed development satisfies each of the ten conservation development principles outlined in the Lino Lakes Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development. The principles are: • Ensure Environmental Protection and • Construct a Convenient and Efficient Inter -modal Enhancement Transportation System • Nurture a Healthy Lifestyle • Encourage Energy & Resource Conservation • Create a Sense of Place • Promote Lifelong Learning & Education • Create a Sense of Community • Advocate Aesthetic Design & High Quality Construction • Foster Economic and Cultural Diversity • Ensure Economic Viability 28. Impact on infrastructure and public services. Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? X Yes _No. If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EAW; see EAW Guidelines for details.) The proposed development is located in an urbanizing area and the City intends to provide municipal services to the area. Proposed municipal infrastructure includes an expanded sanitary sewer and water system, a local street, and a site - specific stormwater management system (storm sewer ponds, swales Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 21 Lino Lakes, MN • • • • and infiltration basins). Development in this area will also have an impact on social services such as schools, police, fire, and community activities. The City's Capital Improvements Program (CEP) identifies needed community facilities and equipment to serve the growing population of the City, including future development of the proposed site. It is not anticipated that the proposed development will create major service impacts within the Centennial School District. 29. Cumulative impacts. Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAW in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form). There are no related or anticipated future stages of this project, nor is the project a subsequent stage of an earlier project. Additional development and redevelopment of land in this area of Lino Lakes is anticipated. The City is aware of a mixed use development (Legacy at Woods Edge) being proposed on a 65 -acre parcel of land located northeast of the proposed Lakes Business Park. The proposed Lakes Business Park and the Legacy at Woods Edge are mutually exclusive. In other words, neither are connected actions nor phased actions. Development is anticipated to continue in the Lino Lakes Marketplace Development (Super Target, Kohl's, etc.), which is located in the northeast quadrant of I -35W and Lake Drive. An Environmental Worksheet was prepared and reviewed for the development in 2001. 30. Other potential environmental impacts. If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. None. 31. Summary of issues. Do not complete this section if the EAW is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EAW. List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered-as permit conditions. The analysis conducted to address the preceding questions did not reveal any substantial impacts that would require further investigation prior to proceeding with development of the site. The permits and approvals listed in the response to Question #8 will be obtained at the appropriate times during the project development process. Wetlands The proposed concept will be designed in a fashion as to avoid impacting any wetlands on the site. Erosion/Sedimentation Construction of the project will disturb more than 1 acre of land and therefore must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. A storm water runoff and erosion control plan will be prepared. The collection and treatment of runoff through BMP's such as grass swales, temporary sediment basins, storm water detention ponds, silt fencing, and vegetative filter/buffer strips will be utilized to avoid and minimize potential erosion impacts that may result during construction activities. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 22 Lino Lakes, MN Water Quality /Stormwater Management A storm water drainage system will be constructed to convey runoff to stormwater treatment systems. The City of Lino Lakes has storm water management policies and design standards to reduce the introduction of pollutants to wetlands and other receiving waterbodies. The storm water treatment system will need to incorporate standards and rules of the Rice Creek Watershed District that also governs surface water planning within the project area. The preliminary treatment and retention system will include the creation of water quality ponds, vegetative filter strips /swales, and natural infiltration. The rate and volume of surface water will increase during storm events at the site as additional impervious surface area is added with the construction of buildings and pavement areas. The site will incorporate storm water detention ponds and green space areas to ensure post - development runoff rates will be maintained at the pre- development rates. To maximize pollutant removal efficiencies, the wet detention ponds will be designed and constructed according to NURP standards. Traffic The only mitigation measure necessary will be a southbound right turn lane from Lake Drive to the development. A northbound left turn lane will be desirable in the future as volumes increase and Lake Drive is improved to the north. Land Use Compatibility The proposed development is compatible with surrounding land uses and is consistent with the City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan and Master Plan for this site. Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 23 Lino Lakes, MN • • • RGU CERTIFICATION. The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor. I hereby certify that: The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively. • Copies of this E a eing sent to the entir B distribution list. Signature Date 7 /7/6_3 Title w��'+&w►Ty VELc7P/' -�f6✓7 Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at Minnesota Planning. For additional information, worksheets or for EAW Guidelines, contact: Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN 55155, 651 - 296 -8253, or www.mnplan.state.mn.us Lakes Business Park EAW — July 21, 2003 24 Lino Lakes, MN APPENDIX A Mn/DNR Natural Heritage Database and Nongame Research Program Letter • • July 9, 2003 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, Box 25 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul. Minnesota 55155 -40 Phone: (651) 296 -7363 Jeff Lutz SEH Inc. 10901 Red Circle Drive Minnetonka, MN 55376 Fax: (651) 296 -1811 E -mail: sarah.hoffmann @dnr.state.mn.us E w 11] JUL 1 1 2003 L:9 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON 10901 RED CIRCLE OR. *200 MTKA., MN 55343 Re: Request for Natural Heritage information for vicinity of proposed Lino Lakes Business Park T3 IN R22W Section 17, Anoka County NHNRP Contact #: ERDB 20040011 Dear Mr. Lutz, The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one -mile radius of the area indicated on the map enclosed with your information request. Based on this review, there are 4 known occurrences of rare species or animal aggregation sites in the area searched (for details, see enclosed database printout and explanation of selected fields). Following are specific comments for only those elements that may be impacted by the proposed project. Rare feature occurrences not listed below are not anticipated to be affected by the proposed project. • Lance- Leaved Violets (Viola lanceolata), a Threatened plant species, have been documented a little more than a quarter mile southwest of the proposed project site. This species, as well as several other rare plants including the Tubercled Rein - Orchid (Platanthera,flava var. herbiola), Cross - Leaved Milkwort (Polygala cruciata), and Twisted Yellow -Eyed Grass (Xyris torta), all Endangered species; Tooth —Cup (Rotala ramosior), a Threatened species; and Autumn Fimbristylis (Fimbristylis autumnalis) and Marginated Rush (Juncus marginatus), both species of Special Concern, have recently been documented throughout the Blaine and Lino Lakes areas in conjunction with field surveys conducted for various development projects. Given the location of the project area, we are requesting that a botanical survey of the project area be conducted. Surveys would need to be conducted when the plants are in bloom and should be conducted by individuals with previous experience doing rare plant surveys. I have enclosed a list of potential contractors for your reference. Please note that this list is not exhaustive and there are, of course, other botanists in the state who would be able to do these surveys. If it is determined that this project will impact any species listed as either Endangered or Threatened, you will need to contact Bonita Eliason, Supervisor, Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, at (651) 297 -2276 to discuss the endangered species permitting process. Minnesota's endangered species law (MS 84.0895) and associated rules (Chapter 6212.1800 - 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit taking, importing, transporting, or selling endangered or threatened plants or animals, including their parts or seeds, without a permit. For plants, taking includes picking, digging, or destroying. I have enclosed some additional information on the permitting process for your reference. DNR Information: 651 - 296 -6157 • 1 -888- 646 -6367 • TTY: 651 -296 -5484 • 1- 800 - 657 -3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a 1 Niv Minimum of 10% Post - Consumer Waste The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, a unit within the Division of Ecological Services, Department of Natural Resources. It is continually updated as new information becomes available, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, natural communities, and other natural features. Its purpose is to foster better understanding and protection of these features. Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rare or otherwise significant natural features in the state that are not represented in the database. A county -by- county survey of rare natural features is now underway, and has been completed for Anoka County. Our information about natural communities is, therefore, quite thorough for that county. However, because survey work for rare plants and animals is less exhaustive, and because there has not been an on -site survey of all areas of the county, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist on the project area. The enclosed results of the database search are provided in two formats: index and full record. To control the release of locational information which might result in the damage or destruction of a rare element, both printout formats are copyrighted. The index provides rare feature locations only to the nearest section, and may be reprinted, unaltered, in an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, municipal natural resource plan, or report compiled by your company for the project listed above. If you wish to reproduce the index for any other purpose, please contact me to request written permission. Copyright notice for the index should include the following disclaimer: "Copyright (year) State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources. This index may be reprinted, unaltered, in Environmental Assessment Worksheets, municipal natural resource plans, and internal reports. For any other use, written permission is required." The full- record printout includes more detailed locational information, and is for your personal use only. If you wish to reprint the full- record printouts for any purpose, please contact me to request written permission. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program focuses only on rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. If you require further information on the environmental review process for other wildlife - related issues, you may contact your Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, Wayne Barstad, at (651) 772 -7940. An invoice for the work completed is enclosed. You are being billed for map and database search and staff scientist review. Please forward this invoice to your Accounts Payable Department. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, J. Sarah D. Hoffmann Endangered Species Environmental Review Coordinator encl: Database search results Rare Feature Database Print -Outs: An Explanation of Fields Botanical Surveyors List Endangered Species Permitting Fact Sheet Invoice cc: Wayne Barstad • • • APPENDIX B Cultural Resources Investigation, Lakes Business Park JUL.11.2 0E3 9:47AM MN HISTORICAL SOC MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE July 11, 2003 Ms. Anne Ketz The 106 Group 370 Selby Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 RE: I- 35W/Lake Drive Development Project T31 R22 S17, Lino Lakes, Anoka County SHPO Number. 2003 -2259 NO.979 P.2/2 Dear_ Ms. Katz: Thank you for consulting with our office during the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above referenced project. We believe that there is a good probability that unreported archaeological properties might be present in the project area. Therefore, we recommend that a survey of the area be completed. The survey must meet the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation, and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. If the project area can be documented as previously disturbed or previously surveyed, we will re- evaluate the need for survey. Previously disturbed areas are those where the naturally occurring post- glacial soils and sediments have been recently removed. Any previous survey work must meet contemporary standards. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFRS00, Procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the protection of historic properties. If this project is considered for federal assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, it - should be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Please contact us at (651) 296 -5462 if you have any questions regarding our comments on this project. Sincerely, y..� Jav' Dennis A. Gimrnestad Govemment Programs and Compliance Officer 345 1(& 110 Boulevarcl.lVenr / Sair1L Paul, Minnesota 55102- 1906 / `fulephone 651- 296 -6126 Source: Anoka County, Glenn Rehbein Companies, Mn/DOT, USGS, MNDNR, and SEH. City of Lino Lakes Lakes Business Park USGS Location Map • z v c 0 O CD to- rd d1 a 'C U 0 c o. 2 o= 8 vN • c a W L !r C CZ C7 C m U YO ft w Q2 C V m O y fA 3 • Legend Business Park Site Boundary Parcel Boundaries ® Invasive Species MLCCS Code, Description CD 11120, 11% to 25% impervious cover with coniferous trees O11224, Boxelder -green ash (forest) with 11- 25% impervious cover O11324, Planted mixed coniferous /deciduous trees with 11 -25% impervious cover CD 13114, Short grasses and mixed trees with 4 -10% impervious cover O 13124, Short grasses and mixed trees with 11 -25% impervious cover 13212, Non - native dominated long grasses with 4 -10% impervious cover O13231, Short grasses with 26 -50% impervious cover () 13241, Short grasses with 51 -75% impervious cover Source: Anoka County, Lino Lakes, MNDNR, and SEH. Business Park MLCCS - Base Map 11x17.mxd 07/10/2003 bd Lakes Business Park 14113, O 14122, O 14214, O 21110, (ii 23112, D 23211, Buildings and pavement with 76 -90% impervious cover Pavement with 91 -100% impervious cover Other exposed /transitional land with 0 -10% impervious cover Upland soils with planted, maintained, or cultivated coniferous trees Long grasses with sparse tree cover on upland soils Short grasses on upland soils 23212, Long grasses on upland soils 23312, Long grasses and forbs on upland soils CT) 32210, Floodplain forest CD 61220, Medium -tall grass non - native dominated grassland 61510, Cattail marsh - seasonally flooded 61530, Seasonally flooded non - native dominated emergent vegetation Modifiers 412 Reed Canary Grass 333 Low Quality Natural Community Coordinate System: Anoka County, NAD83, Feet .-5 MLCCS Impacts 0� 300 600 NORTH 900 1,2 Feet eagure 3 -A Legend Site Boundary Land Cover derived from MLCCS Impervious Surfaces Brush /Grassland Wooded /Forest (Other) Floodplain Forest Wetland Source: Glenn Rehbein Companies, Anoka County, Lino Lakes, MNDNR, and SEH. Pre - construction - Map 11x17.mxd 07/10/2003 bd Lakes Business Park Existing Land Cover Map 0 Coordinate System: Anoka County, NAD83, Feet 200 400 600 Feet NORTH •;ure 3 -B Legend Site Plan Concept Buildings Parking and Roads Source: Anoka County, Glenn Rehbein Companies, Lino Lakes, MNDNR, and SEH. CITY < t' "c?" O F IN KES Proposed Development - Site Plan Map 11x17.mxd 07/10/2003 bd ,41171:r5e1P Lakes Business Park Proposed Development Site Plan 0 200 400 Coordinate System: Anoka County, NAD83, Feet NORTH 600 80Feet "'jure 4 -A Legend INN Site Boundary Land Cover derived from MLCCS and Concepts Impervious Surfaces Lawn /Landscaping Brush /Grassland Wooded /Forest (Other) Floodplain Forest Wetland (Other) Ponding Source: Anoka County, Glenn Rehbein Companies, Lino Lakes, MNDNR, and SEH. Post - construction - Map 11x17.mxd 07/10/2003 bd Coordinate System: Lakes Business Park Anoka County, NAD83, Feet Post - Development Land Cover Map 0 200 400 600 80Feet A. NORTH •ure4-B Legend Business Park Boundary Hydric Soils Map Unit Symbol, Hydrologic Group Iw, ND LnA, A Source: Anoka County, LMIC, and SEH. ZmB, A ZmC, A Business Park Soils - Base Map 11x17.mxd 07/02/2003 bd Alier010 5 Lakes Business Park Soils Map 10 00 Coordinate System: Anoka County, NAD83, Feet 400 600 800 Ak NORTH •gure 5 • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 5E Richard Thompson August 13, 2003 Sportatorium Fogarty Investments, LLC: Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and MUSA Expansion 40.58 Acres between Cedar Street and Proposed 21st Avenue South BACKGROUND Fogarty Investments is proposing to develop part of a 40 -acre parcel located east of Centerville and west of 1 -94. The area is designated as Growth Area 1, 1998 -2010 and is guided as Industrial in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The land is zoned LI, Light Industrial. Clearwater Creek runs northwest/southeast over the northern half of the property, while an NSP utility easement runs southwest/northeast in the southern half of the parcel. Surrounding land uses are Clearwater Business Park on the north, Interstate 35E on the east, land guided as medium density with one residential unit to the south, and Centerville where the predominant land uses are industrial and vacant to the west. The parcel will be served by improving Cedar Street to the east (on the south side of the property) and extending 21st Avenue South on the west side of the property. The Applicant, Fogarty Investments, is proposing to use the southern one -third of the parcel for an inflatable bubble to house three ice rinks, a restaurant, a banquet hall, a and pro shop. (The inflatable bubble was formerly located near Rice Street and Arlington in St. Paul.) In addition to the bubble, the Proposal includes on -site parking for 462 vehicles. This review is based upon information contained in the following documents: 1. Certificate of Survey (June 9, 2003) 2. Lino Lakes Sportatorium - Site Plan (July 14, 2003) 3. 'Lino Lakes Sportatorium - Landscaping Plan (July 14, 2003) 4. Lino Lakes Sportatorium - Architect's Rendition - Colored 5. Lino Lakes Sportatorium - Front Elevation (July 14, 2003) 6. Lino Lakes Sportatorium - Floor Plan (July 14, 2003) 7. Lino Lakes Sportatorium - Lighting Plan (July 14, 2003) 8. Drainage Calculations (July 14, 2003) 9. Storm Sewer Design (July 16, 2003) 10. Lino Lakes Sportatorium - Shadow Study (July 14, 2003) 12701 -002 • • • 11. Full Size Site, Grading, and Utility Plan Sheets (July 23, 2003) 12. Full Size Construction Plan Sheets (C1, U1 -U6) (July 14, 2003) 13. Revised Full -Sized Construction Plan Sheets (C -1, U -1 -U6, Dl, X1 -X7) (July 23, 2003) 14. Construction Plans for Cedar Street West and 21st Avenue North - Utility and Street Improvements On June 19, 2003, the City sent a letter to Mr. Bill Fogarty of Fogarty Investments indicating the Conditional Use Permit submitted was incomplete. The items needed to make the application complete, with the exception of the traffic analysis, have now been submitted. ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Industrial Light Industrial West Industrial - (Centerville) Industrial (Centerville) North Industrial Light Industrial East I -35E and Industrial Light Industrial South Medium Density Residential Rural The land for which the Sportatorium is proposed is currently zoned Light Industrial. The Light Industrial District allows as a permitted use "12. Recreational business contained entirely within the principal building." The Sportatorium, which includes three ice sheets, qualifies as a recreational business contained within the principal building. The proposed use is unique in that it constitutes two separate but related uses, the ice facility and the restaurant/banquet room/pro shop. Based on the City Zoning Ordinance, these uses are conditional uses in the LI District: (Section 8, Subd.1.I (1)) "Accessory, indoor retail, rental, or service activity other than that allowed as a permitted use or conditional use within this section, provided that: (a) Such use is accessory and related to the permitted industrial use allowed within the LI District; and (b) Such use does not constitute more than thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area of the principal building." The pro shop, restaurant and banquet area are all incidental to the ice arena, and these uses together at 9,204 square feet are less than ten percent of the total floor area of the facility (117,000 square feet). The restaurant, banquet room and pro shop qualify as conditional uses to the principal use. Most of the surrounding land uses are either industrial, medium density residential, or rural. To the east is I -35E, a major transportation corridor, which runs north/south along the property and serves as a buffer between the proposed use and land uses on the east side of the freeway, which includes both industrial and residential. 12701 -002 • Lot Area Requirements The minimum lot size required for sewered development in the LI - Light Industrial District is one acre. This proposed use meets the minimum size requirements. Setback Requirements Principle Building Parking Lot From Arterial Street (I -35E) From Local Street From Residential District Side Yard Rear Yard Required 50 Feet/72.5 Feet* 30 Feet/43.5 Feet* 75 Feet/108.75 Feet* 14.5 Feet* 15 Feet Proposed Required Proposed 50 Feet 15 Feet 15 Feet > 300 Feet 15 Feet 15 Feet 386 Feet 50 Feet 5 Feet > 1000 Feet ** 5 Feet 15 - 422 Feet 556 Feet ** * The greater required setbacks on front and side yards result from the proposed height of the building (90 feet), the district limitation (45 feet), and the requirement in the Zoning Ordinance that each ten (10) feet exceedance of the height requirements shall result in a ten (10) percent increase in the setback distances. ** Estimates based on Plans submitted by the Applicant. Rear -yard distances are based on the limit of the Applicant's property, which extends well beyond the site of the proposed use. Setbacks for additional uses to the north will need to be maintained when that land is subdivided and developed. The structure meets the setback requirements of a building of the height proposed with the exception of the 22.5 -foot requirement added onto the setback from the arterial road, due to the height of the building. The building infringes on the setback on the east due to efforts by the Applicant to avoid a small wetland on the west side of the property. Height Requirements In the LI District, no building shall exceed forty -five (45) feet in height. The dome will be 90 feet high at the center. Based on the proposed height, the structure will be considered a conditional use. A conditional use for height in the City's Zoning Ordinance prescribes a number of performance criteria related to shadows, buffers, setbacks and landscaping that must be addressed. (See Conditional Use Requirements). 12701 -002 • • Impervious Surface Coverage The Plans contain no calculations regarding impervious surface. Building areas are included, but summaries of areas devoted to parking are not included. Rough calculations indicate that about 194,000 square feet will be covered by impervious parking lots or access drives between parking areas. This area, added to the area for the buildings (111,500 square feet) results in 305,500 square feet or 7.01 acres of impervious surface. Seven acres represents 17.3 percent of the site. The Ordinance states that in "no event shall off - street parking space, structures of any type, buildings or other features cover more than eighty -five (85) percent of the lot area resulting in less than fifteen (15) percent pervious surface. The Proposal meets the impervious surface requirements, but the Developer must realize that the amount of impervious capacity used up in this development will affect future usage of the remainder of his parcel. Building Requirements The building requirements are contained in Section 3, Subd 4 (B) (4). The proposed structure is by its nature unusual and, as proposed, would consist of two related but highly different structures. The inflatable dome is nearly impossible to vary; it is a white structure made of durable plastic and canvas. The second attached structure is a brick building like a large residential unit. Given these limitations, it would be impossible to meet the requirements (a) for "essentially the same or a coordinated harmonious finish treatment." The Ordinance further directs (b) that "exterior wall surfaces may be a combination of materials including brick, pre -cast concrete panel...." The entranceway and restaurant certainly meet these requirements, while the inflatable portion of the structure does not. It is common for these structures to be configured with a front entrance of stone or other building material to soften the effects of the stark, white structure. No metal panels are proposed for this structure (c), and earth tone colors are proposed for the restaurant portion of the building (d). From the architect's sketch, it appears not more than 10 percent of the building facade is in contrasting colors (e) and a condition of the project should be that all air conditioning or blower units on the property shall be screened. Since, by its nature, the proposed complex cannot meet all the specific building requirements of the Ordinance, it is recommended that the project be viewed as a whole with extensive use of landscaping, especially the planting of trees, to create visual interest around the structure. Buffers The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance states that "where a side or rear lot line in an LI District coincides with an adjacent residential or commercial district, or public road right - of -way, a landscape buffer area shall be provided along such side or rear lot line not less 12701 -002 • than forty (40) feet in depth and shall contain landscaping, planting, berming or other • • effective screening suitable to provide an effective screen." Based upon this requirement, the proposed structure would need to be buffered on three sides, the east, south, and west. However, the east side of the structure is bordered on I -35, which itself becomes a buffer between nearby uses and the structure. Nevertheless, some landscaping on the east side of the structure would break up the visual effect of this large structure to travelers on the freeway. On the south side of the structure there is about 300 feet of parking area. The Developer is proposing modest landscape amenities at the south end of the parking lot. These amenities consist of an attractive stone column and wood fence section with overstory trees between the parking lot and the right -of -way line. While the Ordinance does not specifically call out the need for a buffer in front of the building, the parking lot serves some of the purpose of a buffer. Since the City's Comprehensive Plan identifies "transition from industrial uses to single family uses" as a planning issue in this District, extra measures should be taken to soften the effect of such a large structure on the landscape. Among other measures, the planting of trees in the parking area is encouraged. On the west side of the structure, there is 414 feet of open space between the structure and the proposed road (21st Avenue). At least forty feet of this area should be placed in plantings, preferably trees to break up the stark facade of the air dome. Permitted/Conditional Use From the perspective of the Zoning Ordinance, the proposed use fits within the permitted category "Recreational business contained entirely within the principal building." This use fits that definition. However, since the proposed building exceeds the height requirements of the District (45 feet), a conditional use permit is required. Such a permit can be granted provided the following conditions are met: • "Demonstrated need is established for the increase in height and said increase will not violate the intent and character of the Zoning District..." In this District it is not uncommon to have structures that exceed the height requirements. A structure of the size proposed that is air - inflated needs sufficient height to remain supported. • "The site is capable of accommodating the increased structure size." In this case with 40 acres, the site can certainly accommodate a structure of this height. "The potential increased intensity and size of use does not cause an increase in traffic volumes beyond the capacity of the surrounding streets." There were no projected traffic counts presented as part of this Proposal. Since 21st Avenue south will be a road extension and Cedar Street will be a road improvement, and good arterial access is provided from I -35E, the major issue will be the ability of Birch Street and CSAH 21, as well as the Main Street/21st Avenue Intersection, and the Cedar Street/Centerville Road Intersection, to handle additional traffic. Without traffic 12701 -002 • forecasts and a traffic analysis, it is not possible to address the effects of • • additional traffic on local roads. • "Public utilities and services are adequate." (See Engineer's comments Attachment 1.) There are no major issues related to water and sewer capacity associated with the proposed development. However, this area is not currently in the City's Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), although it is guided as "Growth Area 1998 - 2010" in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Approval by the City to allocate 38 acres of commercial/industrial MUSA will be required before the project can proceed. • "For each additional story over the District limitation or for each additional ten (10) feet above the maximum allowed per District, front and side yard setback requirements shall be increased by ten (10) percent. See "Setback Requirements." • "The construction does not limit solar access to abutting and/or neighboring properties..." The Applicant has provided a detailed shadow study that illustrates the length and position of shadows at different times of the day in different seasons. Based on this analysis, shadows will extend beyond the property line to the east and north in January, April and October. However, since the neighboring land use to the east is I -35E, the shadows will not impede solar access needs on the freeway. There are no impacts to neighboring properties that might desire to employ solar power for their residences or businesses. • "The provisions of Section 2, Subd 2. of this Ordinance are satisfactorily met." These provisions lay out the process for project review and standards, which include consistency with the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan. The areas of the Plan to be considered include: Land Use Plan, Transportation Plan, Utility Plans, Local Water Management Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, Policy Plan, and Natural Environment Plan. This Proposal generally meets the requirements of the City's Comprehensive Plan and improves the capital improvement position of the city with the Applicant's Proposal to construct 21st Avenue and Cedar Street. A Joint Powers Agreement between the Cities of Lino Lakes and Centerville will need to be created. Landscaping With the exception of the immediate vicinity of the proposed structure and the parking lot, the Landscaping Plan is limited in the area and scope of landscaping. More detail on the Landscaping Plan should be provided, at least in an area comparable to the 40 -foot buffer area of the building. Section 3, Subd 5 (o) (1) states that parking areas of six (6) or more required spaces shall be landscaped on all sides in compliance with Section 3, Subd 4 (q). The Landscaping Plan needs to address this requirement. 12701 -002 • • Section 3, Subd 5 (o) (2) states that "within off - street parking facilities for commercial uses of fifty (50) or more stalls, irrigated landscaped islands or peninsulas or rain gardens shall be provided at a rate of one hundred (100) square feet per twenty -five (25) surface stalls or fraction thereof." The Landscaping Plan presented to the City shows two small landscaped islands. Additional islands will need to be provided. All islands within the parking lots should be landscaped and of sufficient width to accommodate such landscaping. The Developer should work with Staff to refine the Landscaping Plan in accordance with Lino Lakes landscaping requirements. Traffic and Access As proposed, access to the site would come from 21st Avenue South and Cedar Street. Cedar Street is an existing gravel road and 21st Avenue does not currently exist. The City originally prepared a Feasibility Study in conjunction with utility extension to construct 21st Avenue, from Main Street to Cedar Street, in 1998; however, the street was not constructed. The City is currently advertising for bids to construct 21St Avenue from Main Street to a point approximately 600 feet south to serve existing businesses. As part of the project, the Developer is proposing to construct to city standards both Cedar Street and 21st Avenue. Both roads in the vicinity of the Sportatorium will be constructed to City standards sufficient to meet the anticipated traffic on those roads. Since half of the proposed right -of -way lies within the City of Centerville, a Joint Powers Agreement will be required between the two cities. Traffic coming from the northwest would likely come through Centerville on CSAH 14 (Main Street) to 20th Avenue or 21st Avenue. From the west, traffic would likely come on Birch Street east to 20th Avenue or 21st Avenue. Traffic from out of town would most likely travel on 35E to CSAH 14 and south to the facility. However, there is no indication of the volume of traffic or peaks expected to be generated by the facility. It is not clear from the information presented whether there would be games or just practices. Normal traffic for this kind of facility would generally be off -peak, during evening hours and weekends. However, if the facility will host games or tournaments, traffic can be significant in the evening or on weekends. A traffic analysis should be performed to indicate the impact of the facility on local streets. (See Attachment 2). Concern has been raised by residents living on the south side of Cedar Street, east of the proposed 21st Avenue intersection regarding the primary access to the site coming from Cedar Street. While staff does not recommend eliminating the Cedar Street access there are several reasons to provide a secondary access to the site from 21st Avenue. They are as follows: 1. Access from 21st will reduce traffic and need for left turns on the eastern segment of Cedar Street. 2. Secondary access would relieve congestion with people trying to leave the facility after practices, games or events. 12701 -002 • • 3. Cedar is an existing quarter mile long cul -de -sac. Provision of a secondary access would allow an additional option of Emergency Vehicle access. It would be reasonable provide the secondary driveway from 21st Avenue acknowledging that modifications or changes may happen in conjunction with future development of the parcel. Parking The Proposal includes spaces for 462 parking stalls. The materials provided by the Developer do not explain the process by which that number was derived. A cursory calculation based on the requirements of the Ordinance would indicate a need for in excess of 10,000 parking spaces, which is intended for an indoor skating rink with spectators. The Developer must provide more information on the exact use of the structure, and, if it will be set up for spectators, how many seats will be provided. Environmental Board The reviewed the request on June 25, 2003 and recommended denial. There comments are attached and provide recommendations if the project is approved. Findings 1. The Sportatorium consisting of the ice arena is a conditional use in the LI - Limited Business District due to height exceedence of 45 feet. A structure of the size proposed that is air- inflated needs sufficient height to remain supported. 2. The restaurant, banquet hall and pro shop qualify as conditional uses to the principal use. 3. The proposed use will require a MUSA expansion of 38 acres from the City's Growth Area - 1998 -2010. 4. Pending the MUSA expansion, public sewers and public water can be extended to this facility. 5. The proposed building meets all setback requirements except the setback requirements on the east. The Applicant has positioned the building on the east side of the property in order to avoid a small wetland on the west side of the structure. 6. The building meets the impervious surface requirements of the Ordinance, but the Developer must realize that the amount of impervious capacity used in this development will affect future usage of the remainder of this parcel. 7. Since the proposed complex cannot meet all of the specific building requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, the project should be viewed as a whole with extensive use of landscaping, especially the planting of trees, to create visual interest and relief around the structure. 8. All air conditioning and blower units shall be screened and landscaped. 12701 -002 • 9. The Applicant should work with City Staff to refine the Landscaping Plan to reflect the spirit of the City's landscaping requirements. 10. The Proposal meets the City's requirements for buffering. 11. The shadow study demonstrates shadows that will extend the property lines only to the east in the area of the freeway. The proposed use will not impede anyone's access to solar energy. 12. The Proposal is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan including Land Use Plan, Transportation Plan, Utilities Plan, Local Water Management Plan, Capital Improvement Plan and Natural Environment Plan. 13. The two access roads, 21st Avenue and Cedar Street in the vicinity of the Sportatorium will be built by the Applicant to City standards to meet anticipated traffic on the roads. 14. The Applicant must prepare a traffic analysis including traffic counts and peak hour analysis for staff review. 15. Depending on the results of the traffic analysis, if significant amounts of traffic will come to the facility from the north on 21st Avenue, the Applicant should provide an additional entrance to the parking area from 21st Avenue. 16. The Proposal appears to provide adequate parking for the facility; however, final determination of parking requirements will depend on the proposed usage, and traffic to and from the facility. • Required Actions 1. Approve allocation of 38 acres of MUSA. 2. Approve the Sportatorium as a conditional use with conditions based upon the exceedence of height requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. 3. Approve the restaurantfbanquet hall /pro shop as a conditional use with conditions based upon the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. 4. The City should authorize staff to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Centerville for improvements to 21st Avenue. Recommendations Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Board recommend approval of the MUSA allocation request, the conditional use request based upon height requirements and the restaurant/banquet hall /pro shop subject to the following conditions: 1. That a traffic analysis be conducted and provided to City Staff not later than August 15, 2003, and that such analysis meets the requirements of the Ordinance as interpreted by City Staff. 2. That air conditioning and blower units be screened and landscaped. 3. That the Applicant work with City staff to refine the Landscaping Plan to reflect the spirit of the City's landscaping requirements. 4. The Applicant should provide an additional entrance to the parking area from 21st Avenue. 12701 -002 • ATTACHMENTS 1. General location map 2. City Engineers memo dated 8 -8 -03 3. Environmental Board comments 4. Certificate of Survey, received 6 -9 -03 5. Site Plan, dated 6 -9 -03 6. Grading & Utility Plans, dated 6 -9 -03 7. Lighting Plan, dated 6 -10 -03 8. Landscaping Plan, dated 6 -9 -03 9. Floor Plan, dated 6 -9 -03 10. Elevation, dated 6 -9 -03 • • 12701 -002 CITY LAND L 2 31 4 B13` X12 II t attlidEM El 7240 oo 72ND ���� Meng= 44 71111111E4 Nipzi AIM IN EmitH SPAcimess 1 11\ CITY OF LINO LAKES ENTERVILLE * E `tiiii fiE�. ��11e11 PETERSON S -� t�j 3 (7 . G ^tlu 2 NO AMMO . -� N 4 r` 2 1 e 1`� ~�D P. I 15% 9„ /` t„ 13V7i .\A D Q�0 E R RO OQ vci�FCn RI/9 /6 /7 /6 II &._a 21 411® ®m12m® gam .2 4'S� iii.. ® ®Ogrd�° 07:410 n. 4I grog ' ms 0©LQEiin s ©�� LAN° 46 COUNTY —STATE -AID - HIGHWAY /NGYJSTR /AL 2 Cy 4 I 5 6 8 .7 PARK I 9 4. +06.2 ELPS l ITV OF LINO LAKES 2? TE RIV 15 116 17 16 19 20 LEARWATE 9 CREE 6 TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • • MEMORANDUM To: James E. Studenski, P.E. City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Copies To: From: Patrick M. Windler, P.E. Date: August 8, 2003 1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Reference: Engineering Review Sportatorium Commercial Development Site 12701 -002 Comm. No. Routing: The subject property is located along the west side of Interstate 35E, north of Cedar Street, between Cedar Street and County Ditch No. 47 (Clearwater Creek) on a 40.58 acre parcel. The parcel is generally open and undeveloped, level, and sloping north toward Clearwater Creek. There are areas of wetland and an NSP (Xcel) easement crossing over the southeast comer of the property. It is proposed to construct an enclosed sports facility on the southeast portion of this property. The facility would include a 350 -foot diameter dome containing three hockey rinks, and an adjacent and attached permanent building that would include a restaurant and pro -shop. A small segment of wetland will be impacted and require mitigation. This review is based upon the following information received: 1. Site, Grading, and Utility Plan Sheet S -1.1 dated July 22, 2003, prepared by Design Resource Group 2. Construction Plans for Cedar Street West - 21st Avenue North - Utility and Street Improvements dated July 23, 2003, prepared by Metro Land Surveying and Engineering (Plan Sheets Cl, U 1 through U6, D1, X1 through X7). 3. Drainage Calculations packet (various documents) including HydroCAD (Existing, 2 -year and 100 - year), Cover Sheet, Rational Method and Site Plans (3 Sheets) with all of them dated as received on July 16, 2003, at City Hall. 4. Previous Lino Lakes Engineering Review dated June 25, 2003, by Scott Brink, P.E., TKDA, for the City of Lino Lakes. General 1. Site soil logs provided suggest that the underlying soils are generally silty sands and sandy clays. The construction of the proposed sports facility, parking areas, and utilities shall comply with the recommendations provided by the geotechnical engineer. 2. Two adjacent and parallel NSP easements (a combined total width of 116 feet) cross over the southeast corner of the property. It would appear from the drawings that improvements within the easement area would consist primarily of parking area. However, it is not clear from the drawings if building units are intended to extend into the easement. It is recommended that the Developer address An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • • Engineering Review Page 2 August 8, 2003 Sportatorium Commercial Development Site this issue further as follows: Determine what type of development or use is allowed within the easement area (i.e., confirm that the construction of a parking lot is acceptable), and identify what restrictions (if any) apply for the easement. If it is necessary to vacate a portion of an easement, the Plans must identify accordingly. 3. The site area location is unique in that it is bordered by the City of Centerville on the west and by I- 35E on the east. Cedar Street is current a gravel roadway, and would require upgrading to current design standards, which includes concrete curb and gutter and bituminous paving. However, jurisdiction of the roadway is shared with the City of Centerville. In addition, the west boundary of the property (existing drainage, utility, and roadway easement) is proposed to be constructed as 21st Avenue South, which would also be shared with the City of Centerville. It is recommended that the Cities of Centerville and Lino Lakes meet jointly to discuss immediate and long range development activities in this area, timing of required public improvements, maintenance responsibilities, and other mutual long term goals and interests. 4. The subject property is bordered on the east by I -35E. If the property is to be platted, review and approval by Mn/DOT will be required. Any impacts to Mn/DOT right of way (including drainage), will require review of the Plans by Mn/DOT. 5. All utility (sanitary, water, storm) systems, street systems including sidewalks /trails shall follow City of Lino Lakes engineering standards and/or CEAM specifications. Utility Plan sheets shall have a note referring to City of Lino Lakes and CEAM details along with other pertinent construction notes. All infrastructure design and installation methods shall be installed in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. 6. A Project Manual and/or specification booklet needs to be submitted for engineering review and comment prior to construction Plan approval. Streets 1. 21st Avenue shall have a two (2) foot depth of Granular Bedding (see next comment). 2. For 21st Avenue and Cedar Avenue, use Mn/DOT Select Granular Borrow in lieu of Granular Bedding as shown on Plan Sheet D1. 3. Provide documentation regarding Anoka County Highway Department requirements for the intersection of Anoka County Road 54 (20th Avenue) and the proposed Cedar Street West. 4. Existing driveway restoration shall include 8" of Aggregate Base (Class 5) and 2" Bituminous Wear Course Pavement. Eliminate storm sewer spillways at approximately Stations 0 +50 and 8 +00 on Cedar Street (Sheet U1). It is recommended that a catch basin and piping system be used. Note: It appears that a spillway on the south side of Cedar Street at Station 8 +00 has no outlet source if the cross - sections are shown correctly. Engineering Review Page 3 August 8, 2003 Sportatorium Commercial • Development Site 6. At NE corner of Anoka County Road 54 and Cedar Street West, there is an existing sanitary sewer lift station. Access will be needed to the pumping station. City staff should be contacted to determine access issues. There is another existing sanitary sewer lift station on the east side of 21st Avenue at approximately Station 50 +00. Access issues will need to be addressed at this location also. 7. B618 concrete curb and gutter will be required. 8. All bituminous pavement trails shall be 8.5 feet wide. 9. Recommend 20 feet radii for entrance driveways to the Sportatorium parking lot (approx. Stations 17 +00 and 20 +00 on Cedar Street). 10. Roadway speed limits need to be determined by the Lino Lakes Staff as well as the Centerville Staff. It is recommended that a traffic analysis be conducted to establish potential traffic flows at full development for the area. Then this traffic information can be used to determine speed limits for 21st Avenue and Cedar Street. 11. Contact the Lino Lakes City Engineer to obtain the Plan for 21st Avenue and Northern Lights • Boulevard so that street grades between the projects can be coordinated. • 12. Eliminate the curbcut storm sewer spillways at Station 52 +50. Replace them with a catch basin and storm piping system. Sanitary Sewer 1. Change construction sheet notes for 4" sanitary services to Schedule 40 pipe versus SDR 26 as shown on the submitted Plan set. 2. Locate and show on the construction plans, the proposed 8" sanitary sewer service to Dome and building complex. 3. Show existing 12" DIP forcemain profile along the east side of 21st Avenue for Sheet U4. 4. Show the existing sanitary sewer system along 21st Avenue from approximately Station 48 +00 to Station 60 +00 (end of project). 5. The Developer, along with City Staff from Lino Lakes and Centerville, need to determine the sanitary sewer service needs for the adjacent undeveloped properties along 21st Avenue and Cedar Street. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System documents need to be included in this analysis. It is recommended that the area sanitary sewer service needs be addressed as part of this project. Note: Sanitary services are proposed to the existing homes along the south side of Cedar Street. However, these properties are large enough in area to be split for expanded residential development. That is, the potential for multiple sanitary services to the parcels should be addressed. Engineering Review Page 4 August 8, 2003 Sportatorium Commercial • Development Site 6. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed MPCA Sanitary Sewer Permit, including correspondence and approval of Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). Watermain System 1. Locate and show on the construction Plans the existing watermain system at the intersection of Anoka County 54 and Cedar Street. There are two gate valves shown without a piping system. 2. A fire hydrant needs to be added at the intersection of 21st Avenue and Cedar Street. 3. Locate and show on the construction plans the proposed 8" water service to the building and Dome complex. 4. Gate valves for fire hydrants are to be placed 2.5' from the fire hydrant per City of Lino lakes engineering standards. See Sheet D1. This change Plan sheet notes. 5. Locate and show the existing watermain system along 21st avenue from approximately Station 50 +00 to 60 +00 (approximately end of project). ip6. The Developer and the City Staff of Lino Lakes and Centerville need to determine the water service needs for the adjacent and undeveloped properties along 21st Avenue and Cedar Street. Comprehensive Water System documents need to be addressed in this project. It is recommended that the project water system consider provisions for ultimate development for this area. • Of note, while water services are proposed to the existing homes along the south side of Cedar Street, these properties are large enough to be split for expanded residential development. Thus, the potential for multiple water services should be addressed. 7. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed MDH permit for watermain installation. Stormwater System 1. Stipulations set forth by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) permit application review /approval process shall be met, including wetland issues. It will be important for the Developer's Engineer to keep the Lino Lakes City Engineer updated as the review process with RCWD progresses. Ultimately, the City will review the approved RCWD permit to determine if the City's requirements are met. The overall routing of storm drainage from the development area must be in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Drainage Plan, and the Rice Creek Watershed District. 2. In general, the City does not allow storm sewer pipes or inlets to be less than 15 inches in diameter. The Developer's Engineer should make the changes necessary to the proposed storm sewer conveyance system and inlet structures to comply with this City requirement. Engineering Review Page 5 August 8, 2003 Sportatorium Commercial • Development Site 3. Permanent easements with access availability will be required for all stormwater ponds and conveyance systems not located within the public right -of -ways. 4. A Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan must be provided. In addition, a Storm Sewer Plan must be provided that shows all storm sewer design, including pipe and structure sizes and standard details. Further stormwater review comments are as follows: 1. The 2- and 100 -year storm computations were submitted. The 10 -year storm computations also need to be submitted. 2. A labeled proposed condition drainage area map and routing diagram must be submitted that coincides with the calculations. 3. The existing condition time of concentration does not appear to be correct. A total flow length of greater than 300 feet is given, while a measurement of closer to 1,000 feet is apparent. 4. Location of Erosion Control devices need to be shown on the site Grading Plan. 5. Flood elevations must be shown on the Grading Plan for all pond and wetlands. M6. The City must determine if required existing condition computations are to be based upon fallow conditions versus row crop conditions. Curve numbers would be closer to pre- disturbance conditions of the site. 7. A detail is required for the proposed outlet structure and emergency overflow. A skimming structure shall be required, preferable a reverse grade outlet per City standard detail. 8. The stormwater calculations and design essentially provide for development of the Sportatorium facility itself, which encompasses a relatively small percentage of the entire 40 -acre site. It is recommended that a Stormwater Management Plan be developed that considers ultimate development of the entire 40 acre site. This may be advantageous from the standpoint of limiting or eliminating the need for constructing additional detention facilities as development occurs piece by piece. A "regional" detention facility for the entire site could potentially be constructed to eliminate or reduce future constructions and costs. 9. A wood stormwater "Weir Detail" is shown on Plan Sheet D1. Wood weirs are not allowed in the City of Lino Lakes. Also, please identify the location of control structures on the construction Plans and Site Grading Plan(s). • Motion: A motion was made by Halen, 2nd by O'Connell to look at changes and forward to Council. All approved. Topic: Fogerty Investments p of Recommen ations: The Environmental Board recommended not approving the Plat based on incomplete information. However, if this plat goes forward, an the following concerns were addressed: • The development should adhere to the new lighting ordinance. The development should use the minimum number of fixtures. The fixtures should be downward focused, contained and meet the property line lighting encroachment standards. • There should be no billboards including the existing portable billboard in place. • Buffering should be increased between facilities and neighbors. Buffers need to address excess noise, light and visual impacts. • " Landscaping needs revision and needs to conform to the new zoning code. Appropriate species and more plants are needed especially in parking areas. • Hours of operation should be limited. • There should be an alternative exit and entrance other than Cedar Street. • Concerns about height and visual impacts. • The Environmental Board did not have information on septic /sewer. • The buildings need to reflect rural quality architecture and in the opinion of the Environmental Board, this does not. (Visual concem). • Staff recommendation is followed. • Attach Section 9, Subsection C -2 Impact on Adjacent Properties, page 9 -6 of the City Zoning Code. Staff Recommendations: • Redesign surface water features and try to create a "treatment train" involving wetland restoration. • Provide a 200 -foot buffer along Clearwater Creek including the flood plain boundary. • Add more shade trees into the landscape design. • Provide some island areas in the parking areas for trees . • Design pervious parking into overflow parking areas. Motion: To not approve by Grundhoffer, second by Halen. All in favor. Topic: Frank Feela Inc., Hailey Manor • Page 2 • FILE COPY CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY OF: PART OF THE E1/2 OF THE SW1/4 OF SEC. 24, TWP.'31, RNG. 22 FOR: FOGERTY INVESTMENTS, LL.0 414 Apollo Dr. 5ulte 10 Lino Laks6. MN 55014 NW CORNER OF ME 57/2 OF 7.1E SW /4 OF SECDON 24 lr I/4 CORNER OF SECRON 24-\ NORTH too o so Beale: 1 Inca • 100 Faet DETAIL (NO SCALE) L J 08608 85 .489 I .I09 910 990001 CHECK 95 RIM DWG NO: 9900019 971/20: 514E5T.• 1 el 1 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 55 I hereby eal7ly Mot this survey. plan or report was prepared by me or soar my direct suparvision O that 7 o duly�Licensed Lund Surveyysav under the laws 07 the Stole of Minnesota. Ronad Alva, Dole: 1780.98 No. 17755 Sle CORNER rOF SECTION 24 / NORM (7915 OF ( SW I/O I SR CORNER OF 1145 E1/2 OF THE 597/4 OF SECOON 2. NarI0.44T . 1. Cl9D610HISTt< 412 County /toed 0. Little Canada. MN 55117 e Telephone: (051) 700 -0112 585: (051) 700 -0012. 10 a a a a 90 604 C11WOt OF NCl/4 6W/4 ar MEW 21 - -. - -. - -, - -. REST 19/5 OF Cl/2 SW /4 =WON 24 9. 31. 9. 22 a a 1 7675.60 (Tar 6 NSp eosoneal C/L1 1592.7 tie 50' 115P panel CA) Y %c AREA = 40.58 ACRES 4 / vim/ try /- End v V =+ (wawa uII I i firri46#/ne,ufeL...... 33380 )- 4 a 4 ly 2 0 4 4 1 LU > ° W - N L _ - - - - etaei - - _ _ _ -CEDAR ----- r2a velar grad real S8910.44'W SOU01 roar OF INC SW I/4 939.43 LEGAL DESORPTION ma part a M. East Ha/ a Ina Seuth4a 97.ra a Salton 24. Tens., 11. Rape 21. Mae Coon!), Nasal. 77Ap westerly et letrsta• Mishap, No .75E es d.mbaa in Bak 7031 Pap. 414 en Me and a rom a is M. aka a the Canty R.rar. Mae Counts woman, end bag swthrty a a lied dahlia4 as eems.a.ei.9 e1 the nw la a! comer s/ sa4 East Helh Mace as an awned asap el South 0 area 3e .870 , 05 s.ea0W rat bap N. sat u.. 01 earls Coo h: •'. • 9!1049. of 396.55 7.el I. tno pY.l of NOiw.in I the Ma 1. 4. ameba maws South 17 N as. 40 minutes 21 ado East 24021 lab M.. ... Salo 45 Faye. 40 marl. 27 smalls FM 412.79 MIS Nsaa Seuln 45 arena 25 mat. 19 seconds East 22.129 lab Ulmer San 51 depress 51 .nrwl.s 44 woods Cal 62.06 Ma: Inane. Sough 41 agars 00 main 21 lama (007 191.46 tab Nana South 53 dapnn OS .n.rl. 05 warm Eat 77.80 Ia0 thence Sough u aorta 41 mimeos 17 mama Eat 19.13 ..l 10 M0 naiad). riphl a ay W. 07 aa4 a.l.nlela HiW.vy Na 355 ad seed 0.. Inca t.*10.li.p f9CEp7790 weaker* the Wsa.e d.wi.a Pala: ashainq el the lah..s1 earner et said E.1 Naha Mt Southwest Oaten h.04ee as( etn9 the neat Mae Mari too via: thence s.Ylh.alny le Ma southwest coma el 1M Halnac7 panel a Ma Southwest Carla a aid SKIto tai tone oak Nap ll.a .af Ma et the aria Nalneaat Oua1r el the Southwest 0..019 le ow p1090 Of 0.9+1.17 MO areal OW port el M. 50 INI Ito- lam 51e7. Par Co. parcel as aesaiM in Pah 54 0ona Papa I20 With Ca .9th. Ma .al 370 h. of Use fat Hal e1 M. Southwest Carla e/ Samara 24. Said Marti le also n.0iacl lea 66 fool .Ida aaatlsl N 7810 of N0Ma0 Slotas poor Company 6a n Docualsnl Na. 1026501 1 a N -S 0 7497(9 (7915 fX 55CIWN 24 AI S I/O 5504E5 OF SECTOR. 24 RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 1 1 1 • • • ,:.,!`�r , k.. - °`-,1Fx, ss..: m'.,_. z.1„zr•1. ,:cosec, -a . +s•�c.::+x.ts Vim•,,..- � -,.. i^3'.r- .- F.,+?.;:.;vy •x=- ,ate: -. ::'l.�#�az^.. rV.. w��5b:*i:,,..,. - .w._ -.:.t' e�Pti 1 --s. � i:.� =..'w?iceM 3i�'Yi•:#}:i: 1:= 9,= -.]w ..J.'Y�- N�%•Y..0 <ir�U: a.!.L^&.!JIY.:...,.:._'.9..3. ..T.ao �a MEW rris1WAV MINIM NM ;,1 F. /f (kale la in 100'-o") ❑TEST L Developer! Owner- Fogerty Investments 474 Appolto Drive, Suite 10 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 2. Engineer/ Archltect- Rydell Design Group 9049 G:en Edln. Lane Brooklyn Part, MN 55443 3. Existing Zoning- Light Ir.dustrlal Minimum lot size = 1.0 Acres Proposed lot size = 40.58 Acres Minimum lot width = Proposed lot width = 955' -0' 4. Setbacks - Front Streets! Minimum principal budding- Arterial Street= 50' Proposed from 1 35E= 50' -0' Proposed frog Cedar Street = 348' -0' Proposed from 21st Ave. South = 414' -0' Minimum parking tat = Proposed from Cedar Street g I35E = 15' -0' Rear Yard Principal building = 15' -0' Proposed from north boundary = 1,032' -0' Parking lot = 5' -0• Proposed from north boundary = 566' -0' Side Yard! Principal building = Proposed from 21st Ave. South = 414' -0' Parking lot = Proposed frog 21st Ave. South = 422' -0' From Residential Dtstr cb Principal building = Proposed from south side Cedar Street = 386• Proposed from south side Cedar Street = 386' -0' Parking Lct Information Typical Stall - -Wldth = 9' -0' - Length = 18' -0' Proposed stalls = 492 Two -Way aisle width <See parking lot design requirements ;;or stall calculations.) Required parking lot Island area = 2,076 S.F. Actual parking lot Island area = 3,926 S.F. Waste Storage Areal Shall be loacted as shown on the bituminous surface and screened using a 6' -0' high wooden fence. Proposed Street Accesses! 2 -24' wide oriveways located on Cedar street FILE COPY REVISIONS c ;b.L'ti9.: n.. Tw }+.Y.•.'.:....t ,o.sr.u', +'.be;^E.:'F!i.i.ive^:... ..:saf 6ecr i.:.:.,.e3! -e:: ILDING SETBACK LI 'E PARKIN !!rililllmrdn• DELINEATED WETLAND (TYPICAL) POND OVERFLOW ELEVATION 913.00 - 920.00 BOTTOM POND 908.00 r. MIL ors � ■I ■r UPir41 SA IP IN NM 11111 I ' 1 ■• -�i!iii � • r.otP 111:° LLJ Li.1 L.J._ F- 0 V) 0 LU 0 0 0 0 0 SITE A 40.58 ACR EXI: HOL DRAIN TO PROPOSED INLET CONSTRUCTED FOR 21ST AVE. IMPROVEMENTS '10 -, v:. � BUILDING SETBACK LINE �, /j��,,��� 'n 7+. _ --" I/// s/1.691:77:: � / /�:!!/. % /ii 4 ?n "Sill owl% //&AVAII TAACM /4 Pi J► YLlf i�i�iiL!lLILI /�LILf•A AI ,56•LI1I M „ 50,s. DOS r, or =05.00• ® C pt tcl,t 2005 RI I7eslc n Crap, S. Pews E. R*II. Deslor6r LINO LAKES SPORTATORIUM GRADING & UTILITY PLAN pME: 6/09/20705 MOW. 6 5E-f5ISSl1�7 PAM f10901p1 R SOMA. NKl MillM60 NMgta1 MOO MUM. DI5IR ANOfIMMOKIM11MINOVA c6Mrm IDvery M1aM•6p660@D106a001 ISIVW + POI WU, art rM06.0LT611M rKr CMMMI ma mews A IILWRID MlOIMMM7 M MOM PIE MT'Q 117w61tNOOP.+WIMMOfO CORP.RMIXOPO M:WM Hr6M6aMarOVK 11001 MOH O'011416LIMPOG IC » t hereby oauty that this pIrryw dio.ongm wss impend gmeauod•my flied w••nm old Out i.I ha+a...raairwer Me hwedthermeatYaoe te. Rgaralallo. 21816 M 6L' L ITY OF LINO LAKE FIXTURE DIMENSIONS Vertical 2.251n. ;57ma1 lablo O.t2J In. 'Annul M 20.9 In. a30imnl L = 25.0 In t53rrmni Horizontal W1 23.9 In. ;530mnt L 25.0tn. {635mm1 4 2.25 Y1. ;576n% Variable! M = 13.3In. 331mul • L = 14.4In. i355imnI M = 23.0 kt ;584m61 L 30.21n. ;757 mull M - 15.4 bti ;300mml tL - 18.1 III 459mnt 7 5.5 In. :155mnd M - 15.4 ht 391 nn6 L = 17.0 In. ,432nn0 M : - 9.0 In. :229mm1 10.210. 7mml G.51n. ;165rwmI LIGHTING PLAN SCALE I" — 30'-0" • THE NUMBERS LISTED ON PARKING LOT LAYOUT REPRESENT FOOT CANDLE LEVELS IN THE PARKING LOT C 10 03 N•v10•101,10. 10� tl) 10� . 1010 rl+r) 10`tititi , y10 10 ')10 10 10ti10n) 101010 1010 rt10 010 10 \\ Y10 ! ) 10 10 10 ',1010 �- •'� 1010 ") n) 11+ 10 '�, 1010 4) 1, ti1•ti1'1�'�ti1 ti ti ti ti �+10 101010 ")10 � \ LINO LAICES SPORTATORIUM LIMITING PLAN DATE:: 6/ 10/ 2009 51:f569217 PAtE EEVI5045 DAtE Wn:vn:xnuafn5PUN, fRYAnEffrw6ECMWMTO AvOn N S -5. v[S M CNN&auzNnEE Af.Mmumur40E. MICNE : 5....1 I REAM: C ; 1/W O7NRKrVEfovfxfYnlEM* 40I& NVQ)WMV6NueE EESR71b0.E FOE SANE. nt PWPP, MUM MD e sFROM OfMUa OW,aWV M xEOMP, n0.l= OR MMUS) fat MMEKON Waif ME MAnG10MRNrOf MI5 E.ra11.DEa?!K. FILE COPY RECEIVED JUN 1 2 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • .ID • NOTES: '5 rn \ a \ \ 0 -----r-\R---O"1/4-:---- „ O`O -- \\ \ - -sop \ \ \ \ SWR LL: ' ARD SWR t '16 10' BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY WOODCIERTo BE =To Olt LANDECAPEIBLANDs=LISS Or1ffAWtIE NO= ANDTOSE MID UNDER ALL OYEARANOS mot= KM SOD AND SEED AREAS: • SLID: 05,000SQ. PT. 113.00011Q. PL. 116 28007. 6' CON SIDEWALK WE WOO= LEMPEYCE SY1030L DESCRIPTION LOS BOTANICALNASIC CO ORONNAIC SIZE QIY. ROOT DATE: 6/9/05 SETS • 2 PA I5VISI DAiE NI@1RSDNRMStIMLEYE[omiWl5![iN MRW RI Fa ierovN.r OBRAJIYIErk Arf KJl6fN E f SP4 V��JICf`iWM 51,2 All ACER PUMICES MALL 11.ALUI AMUR MAPLE S• A BB • WO TREE IDNPKSR W YfEYAL PW 6Ch6MV loNSTNENDX r15.0h5141 BR SOMAS 2 W ROYALTY CRABAPPLE r T ES ROYALTY C PROPOSED RCERDIS WB RDONYHCR ALATTS IMMO EIJONYIELIS r 106 POT WOf tvl BSOENCON9!M6t RN6f.[R{ll.ttRiR a PROPOSED COWER= e33 MIA RR.UCA DMAIX BLAC[RIISS BPRUtE VINYL a SS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE VARIER Gum WROUGHT IRON FENCE SECTION 1 LINO LAKES SPORTATORIUM LANDSCAPING PLAN PLANTER SECTION STONE COLUMN/WOOD FENCE SECTION (SCREENING FROM CEDAR) FILEC py I RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • DATE: 6/9/05 SETS • 2 PA I5VISI DAiE NI@1RSDNRMStIMLEYE[omiWl5![iN MRW RI Fa ierovN.r OBRAJIYIErk Arf KJl6fN E f SP4 V��JICf`iWM 51,2 : • yaw Pa IDNPKSR W YfEYAL PW 6Ch6MV loNSTNENDX r15.0h5141 BR SOMAS 2 W O;EG7D MttOLSM EOM RSYNtmP. iw uo Pf CaliD,tOXIIIDOtiaSi SP MR AREASPNRTOIYAt WOf tvl BSOENCON9!M6t RN6f.[R{ll.ttRiR FILEC py I RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • • • JCALE uir-I O A F %l RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2003 CITY OF LIMO LAKES • trbla t)F roc4 r(owes-man UNOLAKES5P0�1" ARUM DAtE 6/9/05 SEf51 fED DAtE REYISIONi DAZE Nla► RpDtlOrMSnNttYSVMR1PfNASaFNMtE10 Novnalt vestuewwramungArv�sraowarce. wot t c1011MO r 1111%4 sow OMITS MD a90161R /OLSOE, M3 MSt76, [OIIIPRMD 'ate �NSnuttNSOrsttns.tnwru>tawn OE MAK N71taTA WM NSWOGW./WM/Dry Ilt COPEAMARSPORANISIMARRAMASOMWOMIE Valt//aMEWO MWbE.taLL.M4kE DESICNNIAY� PUM o� Q{E( 7; A F %l RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2003 CITY OF LIMO LAKES • DAZE PIN 5E5 55100 DAZE FRONT ELEVATION • LINO LAKES SPORTATORIUM nme. 6/9/05 DAMN .A7E oats NOV E60D4, aFiec? xurrMAWR I k HIMOI.IIIR017, COInalielO VR7PNl PcESSOwNDCOWPIO6/tOOl RFOIaOU roesN(. nfS PESe■6.COUEPISM7 7PICKATI 1G/6 NXIIIlEWSRS eKS.ND/64171 KIM OS EILWfXtPM SING /antlEYitOOP.BONEIDLE) w COIMPOMSONWifeWEP POeMPIEMOMNIOXB owswawrw orarsE.mw,aztm. DESIGN MJM : A111 F!LECopy RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V. F. Jeff Smyser August 13, 2003 - PUBLIC HEARING: Rezoning, Preliminary Plat - Variances for Lot Depth and Width Crystal Cove (Outlot B, Highland Meadows East) North Suburban Development, Inc. The site was platted as Outlot B when the Highland Meadow East plat was approved in 1999. The parcel of 0.64 acre is located at the southwest corner of Lake Drive and 79th Street. The application involves the rezoning of part of the outlot and a preliminary plat that covers the entire outlot. The plat would create three lots: one lot for a single family detached home, and two lots that accommodate a two - family attached structure (duplex). The rezoning applies to the two duplex lots. The irregular shape of the property creates a number of constraints that affect the ability to meet several minimum requirements regarding lot dimensions and area. To accommodate the development proposal, the following approvals are necessary: 1. Rezoning of the east side of the site from R -1 to R -2. 2. Preliminary Plat, including 3. Variances for lot depth and width. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Zoning The following is a summary of the of the proposal: Gross Site Area Upland Area Total Lots Net Density 0.64 acres 0.64 acres 3 4.7 units /acre The site is within the existing MUSA. The site is guided for Medium Density Residential, at 3 -6 units per acre. The proposal complies with this density. • • • Crystal Cove page 2 The table below identifies the existing land use, guided land use, and zoning for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning R -1 Site vacant Medium Density Residential Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area North residential (Twilight Acres, across 79th) Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 South residential Medium Density Residential R -1 East Lake Drive, VFW General Business GB West residential (Highland Meadows East) Medium Density Residential R -1 Previous to adoption of the 2002 comprehensive plan, the site was guided for single family residential. The Highland Meadows East plat reflects this with the single family homes along 79th St. In reviews of that plat, however, the City noted that the future land use would be medium density on the remaining land in the plat and to the south, according to what was then the draft comprehensive plan. Outlot A, to the southwest of Outlot B, was intended to accommodate medium density housing. For access, Outlot A includes land intended for a right of way that aligns with Nancy Drive. Immediately abutting Outlot A on the west (Highland Meadows West) are 52 townhomes in 13 quad - home structures. Growth Management Policy: The City's Growth Management Ordinance establishes annual limits on allocation of MUSA reserve and the number of new units that can be platted. The site is within the existing MUSA. As shown below, adding three dwelling units for Crystal Cove has minimal effect on the total units for 2003. LOTS /UNITS Development Name and Phases Prelim Plat Phasing tans by ear (lots /units to be final platted) year 0 end 2 2003 2004 I 2005 2006 2007 Stoneybrook 2nd Addn 103 51 52 Century Farm North 249 56 65 52 43 33 Ravens Hollow (proposed) 56 56 Haley Manor (proposed) 10 Crystal Cove (proposed) 3 3 Bruggeman (proposed) 152 50 54 48 minor subdivision lots 1 total 51 172 175 100 43 33 remaining of 147 -25 -28 47 104 114 • • Crystal Cove page 3 Rezoning The current zoning, R -1 Single Family Residential, does not allow two - family structures. That is the reason for the application to rezone Lots 2 and 3 to R -2 Two - Family Residential. The zoning ordinance requires that, for a zoning amendment application: The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The project complies with the land use in the comprehensive plan: the site is guided for Medium Density Residential use, at 3 -6 units per acre. The project is consistent with the units /per year limit of the growth management policy. The comprehensive plan does promote the creation of housing variety. A two - family structure is consistent with this goal. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The one duplex structure does not pose a compatibility problem with existing nearby homes. According to the comprehensive plan, future development to the south will be at a similar density: 3 -6 units /acre. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (in the zoning ordinance). As discussed below under "Preliminary Plat: Lots ", variances would be needed as the project is proposed. Lot depth and area issues are due to the irregular configuration of the site. The lot width issue could be minimized by increasing the width of the western duplex unit lot. Granting variances would make the proposal consistent with City requirements. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Both water and sanitary sewer service are available in 79th St. on the north side of the site and in Lake Drive. The systems have adequate capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. • • • Crystal Cove page 4 The creation of three dwelling units will not overburden the roads. No new roads are proposed or necessary to serve this three -unit development. Preliminary Plat The proposal does not require extension of sanitary sewer, water, or transportation infrastructure as these services are available at the site. The proposed lots would have access via 79th St. rather than Lake Drive. Lots, Variances: The following table lists the lot requirements in the R -1 and R -2 zones. * Lot depths are the average distance between the front and rear lot lines. The depths discussed here are based on manual measurement on the submitted plat. Lot widths are measured at the setback line, not at the street frontage, and were measured manually on the submitted plat. The precise distances may differ slightly. Outlot B of Highland Meadows East is an irregular piece of property. None of the lot lines are parallel or meet at right angles. The irregularity of the site result in several design difficulties. For example, the sharp angle formed by Lake Drive and 79th St. creates a severe restriction on use of the property because the setbacks from the roads cover a large portion of the site. R -1 minimums proposed Lot 1 R -2 minimums proposed Lots 2 & 3 lot area 10,800 sf 11,720 sf base lot area 15,000 sf 16,181 sf unit lot area 7,500 sf Lot 2 5,586 sf Lot 3 10,595 sf lot depth* 135' 125' 135' Lot 2 130' Lot 3 134' lot width* base lot 80' 95' 100' unit lot 50' Lot 2 43.5' Lot 3 89' setbacks local street 30' 45' 30' 45' collector /arterial 40' 40' Lot 3 40' side 10' 20' 10' Lot 2 15' 5' accessory 15' 5' accessory rear 30' 44' 30' 30 +' 5' accessory 5' accessory * Lot depths are the average distance between the front and rear lot lines. The depths discussed here are based on manual measurement on the submitted plat. Lot widths are measured at the setback line, not at the street frontage, and were measured manually on the submitted plat. The precise distances may differ slightly. Outlot B of Highland Meadows East is an irregular piece of property. None of the lot lines are parallel or meet at right angles. The irregularity of the site result in several design difficulties. For example, the sharp angle formed by Lake Drive and 79th St. creates a severe restriction on use of the property because the setbacks from the roads cover a large portion of the site. • Crystal Cove page 5 Lot Depth: All three proposed lots appear to have less than the required minimum lot depth of 135 ft. This is due to the irregular shape of the original Highland Meadows East property: the southern line of Outlot B is not parallel with Lot 1, Block 2. A variance for lot depths is unavoidable if the property is to subdivide because dividing the property requires the new lots to front on 79th St. Lot Width: On the Crystal Cove plat, Lot 2 is approximately 6.5' short of the minimum lot width. Decreasing the width of Lot 1 would increase the width of Lot 2. Lot 1 is 15' wider than the minimum. With an additional 10 ft. recommended for the Lake Drive right of way, the Crystal Cove site is narrower. Nonetheless, if Lot 1 becomes 80' wide, it appears that Lot 2 could be approximately 48' wide and still leave enough for Lot 3 to accommodate the new setback from Lake Drive. Lot Area: Moving the lot line to increase the width of Lot 2 also would add area to Lot 2. With a 48' width, Lot 2 would be over 6200 sf, a 10% increase. Because of the irregular shape of the site, it is not possible to meet the minimum of 7500 sf . However, it, would be better to increase the lot area as much as possible. Though Lot 3 has excess area and width, the 40' setback from Lake Drive prevents moving everything to the east. It is better to maintain the Lake Drive setback and reduce the lot widths than move the structure closer to the road —a principal arterial. For these reasons, staff supports variances on lot width, depth, and area. However, Lot 2 could be increased in width, and the area could increase somewhat: recognizing that Lot 2 cannot meet the minimums. This should be shown on a revised preliminary plat prior to City Council consideration of the preliminary plat. Variance Findings of Fact: In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The irregular shape of site prevents the subdivision of the property in a way that would meet the minimum lot dimensions in the zoning ordinance. The acute angle formed by the intersection of 79th St. and Lake Drive create a particularly large area that is not • • Crystal Cove page 6 buildable because of the setbacks from the roads. It is reasonable to develop the site in conformance with the land use category of the comprehensive plan. It is unlikely that other properties in the area are so irregularly shaped. Streets: The proposal requires no new streets. It is common to require the dedication of additional right of way. Thirty feet of right of way was acquired for 79th St. as part of the Highland Meadows East plat. An additional 10 feet is needed to complete the Lake Drive right of way: 60 feet from the centerline. (Ten feet would be acquired on the east side if and when land there subdivides.) Utilities: Public water and sanitary sewer exist both in 79th St. and Lake Drive. Whether it is better to connect in 79th or Lake Drive, and how best to make those connections, is being examined. As with any plat, workable plans will be required. Grading and Drainage: The lots will drain to the stormwater facilities in the existing roadways. Specific grading contours will be required prior to final plat approval. An existing storm sewer pipe crosses the extreme northeast corner of the site. This serves to connect an existing pond on the north side of 79th St. to the stormwater facilities in Lake Drive. The exact location of this pipe has not been determined, nor has it been determined if an easement for it exists. This must be resolved prior to final plat approval. On a larger project, the City would require that these utility and stormwater issues be addressed with the submittal. Because of the small scope of this plat, staff is comfortable that the contours, exact stub locations, size of pipes, and location of a culvert in the very corner of a site will be resolved prior to final plat approval. Park Dedication: At the time of the Highland Meadows East plat, the City collected park dedication fees for the four new house lots created by that plat. The City did not collect park dedication for Outlot B or Outlot A. As stated in the staff report at the time, park dedication for these outlots is to be addressed when they are platted. The cash dedication is $1665 per dwelling unit. The creation of three new dwelling units requires park dedication of $4,995. This will be collected with the development agreement financial securities. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Ten feet of right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County for Lake Drive. 2. Lot 2 shall be widened as much as possible and still allow Lot 1 to meet the 80' minimum width and Lot 3 to accommodate a 40' setback from Lake Drive, including the additional 10 feet of right of way. • 3. With the changes described in conditions one and two, variances for lot depth, lot width, and lot area are approved. • • • Crystal Cove page 7 4. A revised preliminary plat that includes these changes and determines revised lot dimensions and areas shall be submitted prior to City Council consideration of the preliminary plat. 5. Park dedication of $4,995 shall be paid: $1665 per dwelling unit. 6. Plans for connecting to sanitary sewer and water must be submitted for City Engineer review prior to final plat approval. 7. The location of and need for an easement for the existing stormwater facility between Lake Drive and the pond north of 79`h St. shall be determined prior to final plat approval. 8. Proposed grading contours shall be shown on a revised plan prior to final plat approval. OPTIONS Prior to any action, the public hearing must be closed. 1. Approve rezoning of the eastern portion of the site (Lot 2 and Lot 3 on the preliminary plat) from R -1 to R -2. 2. Approve variances: lot depth for all three lots, lot width and lot area for Lot 2. Specific dimensions must be determined prior to City Council review. 3. Approve the preliminary plat for Crystal Cove, with the conditions listed above. 4. Continue public hearing or close hearing and table the application, and return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Options 1, 2, and 3 This review is based on the following: Preliminary Plat and Drainage Plan for Crystal Cove, 7/14/03 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL S - .. R V • \\ iA• § ® 13 zW io Ell mow© �I ©C r r IN �N ,M vW ifdPiNIE vasavra '7 lir Amprorptim Um iry 1 11i T / ■io 1 - G6UfMfi-W 1�- R /6HFy OF NS{M EF11110■11171w=0: 11111111MILIV I liplyeam N!AMBER --2-5 i- COUNTY - STATE - AID -HIGHWAY S NO. 14 - U CTLOT 2 3 6 I J LIN !I S ' IN!/" I 8 / OjL. A P;,4S 4V PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Performance Low Density Sewered Residential Medium Density Sewered Residential Public /Semi - Public Low Density Unsewered Residential ST . T1 1 2 3 4 5 5 7 5 5 10 111 1 3 • c0 1 1 • • < • Oj \\ ANN to- - " \y **-.4. -I' • A `0/ \ • / 1 1 f 1 E. 0 =t f1 r • �urtca�nsrMwwrt/ow�a,w�sJ ii <'[ I 1bto' bM (� yp -1/../ S o a . � 0 41A /t9 4(d% oK' s 6 �BZ N /2oo d� << N b,, 04,17, ,l0 E-4 rW on 0 • I1 , I1 1 )-I 1 -J / I' 1 \J \J J' 3`9S.SZ s,ig6 8 N V _ / A , 1 / I \ V • O O • - .4,,f °o, s �j51 j D 92.32Z 6s Z� ZZ` N 3 „cQ,OSo00 N SZYOZ 1/ / / 1 4 ' / co O 0 co Z.0 'SO - Ol'L1717 3„CS,0S000 N 1 1 C 2003 RLK- Kuueisto, LTD. 60 son. W Qy 0! FEE OWNER North Suburban Development. Inc. 1333 Osborne Rood Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 812- 786 -6000 x_4057 05 905.9 DEVELOPER Seth Marshall 14601 Krypton Street N.W. Ramsey, Minnesota 55303 763- 286 -6299 (State of Minnesota) (in trust) Zoned R -1 Preliminary Plat and Drainage Plan fore- CRYSTAL CQ VE CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OFANOKA 'Ir WO I L i 1` - TN. BOS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Outlot 8, HIGHLAND MEADOWS EAST, according to the recorded plot thereof, Anoko County, Minnesota. 907.4 > \79TH 9a7. STREET mvNe aue 6 fwllm• . 907.3 (Steven R. Sutton) Zoned R -1 / / / / PVC Sovlo, I NTq I�x'a1r 11si, 1c- eee.ie — ----- pjo cni 30E.47 /5 -sign 908.2 908.4 908.4 APP — 908.8/ / %Wen / / / / \ t= / \ (Joseph Lacroix) \ \ (K. E. Koren) / \\ Zoned R -1 we / ` _ _ —� _ n rld / s I //. / r i,7:',--IL 1 I Y JJ - ' i / 1 / / y ,/// /siP 1 � j \ -,- A /. / / 11 1 i I C 1... i / \ , / // (TOM epment) / /%ned R -1 i JV Septic Area / /I r—--- era / •/ /M1 c /Shed / 907 908.9 7 380.40.30 -E, / 09.1 eO v¢,if J909.1 ma (Daniel E. Weller) Zoned R -1 / SO PP Sp cy vJ / }aa�,7.�‘I wPOST wNeree[ VICINITY MAP •x i rxn a em 295 UNCIN AT 4' POST T uY G.NNC N 1NE MO. ral a¢[ 6.-12. mm (NN vi sir GawTTrNc Nxrc ATTAIN FABRIC TO SUPPORT VSTS N11.1 LAM N40 SILT FENCE DETAIL PROPOSED: Subdivide property inot 3 single family residential lots with City sanitary sewer and water service. EXISTING ZONING: R -1 PROPOSED ZONING: Lot 1 = R -1 Lots 2 and 3 = R -2 TOTAL ACREAGE = 27,900 SF (0.54± acres) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: R -1 = 10,800 SF R -2 = 7.500 SF MINIMUM FRONTAGE: R -1 = 80 feet R -2 = 50 feet MINIMUM LOT SIZE: R -1 = 10.800 SF R -2 = 7,500 SF PROPOSED LOT DENSITY: R -1 = 1 lot per 11,720 SF R -2 = 1 lot per 8,090 SF MINIMUM LOT DEPTH: 135 feet DATE OF PREPARATION: July 14, 2003 NOTES: 1. Variances are requested for minimum lot size and frontage (Lot 2) and for minimum lot depth (Lots 1 and 2). 2. Location of underground street utilities shown are per City of Lino Lakes asbuilt plans. BUILDING SETBACK MINIMUMS: Front = 30 feet 'Front = 40 State or County Road Side House= 10 feet Side Garage= 5 feet Rear = 30 feet • DENOTES IRON PIPE FOUND p DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE SET BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DATUM SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET 60 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report mts prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Llceneed Land Surwyr under the laws of the Stole of Minnesota. Jeffrey N. Caine DATE 7 -14 -03 REG. NO. 12251 AGENDA ITEM 5G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala P & Z MEETING DATE: August 13, 2003 TOPIC: Conditional Use Permit for an Automobile & Truck Repair Facility JADT Commercial Development, Block 1, Lot 2 & Lot 3 ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND • In September of 2002 the City Council approved the JADT Addition (Resolution No. 02- 111), which included the creation of four lots for single and multiple tenant use on property located east of Lake Drive and south of Apollo Drive. A master site plan, grading and drainage plan, utility plan and landscaping plan was also approved in conjunction with the plat approval. Lot 4 received Site Plan Review approval and a Conditional Use Permit for an accessory drive- through at that time. The applicant is now requesting site plan approval for development on Lots 2 and 3. The proposed development consists of two multi -tenant retail building that are 13,847 square foot and 3,500 square feet, respectively. The smaller building also consists of a proposed three bay automobile repair facility. Automobile repair facilities are listed as a Conditional Use within the GB, General Business District. This review is based on the most current submittal, consisting of the following plans: 1.) General location map. 2.) Master Site Plan, dated 7- 14 -03. 3.) Master Planting Plan, dated 7- 14 -03. 4.) Planting Plan, dated 7- 14 -03. 5.) Landscape Details, dated 7- 14 -03. 6.) Photometric Lighting Plan, dated 7- 14 -03. 7.) Floor Plan (Building A), dated 7- 14 -03. • 8.) Floor Plan (Building B), dated 7- 14 -03. 9.) Exterior Elevations (Building A), dated 7- 14 -03. 10.) Exterior Elevations (Building B), dated 7- 14 -03. • • Planning & Zoning Board Meeting JADT — Lot 1 & Lot 2 August 13, 2003 ANALYSIS Land Use & Zoning Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Mixed Use PDO (Planned Development Overlay) West Mixed Use PDO North Mixed Use PDO East Mixed Use PDO South Mixed Use LB (Limited Business) The JADT project was originally located within the SC, Shopping Center Zoning District. This zoning was amended to PDO, Planned Development Overlay to allow for design flexibility on the site. The SC District was subsequently eliminated with the revision of the recently adopted Zoning Ordinance, and the requirements of the GB, General Business District are now applicable to the site. In accordance with the provisions of the GB, General Business District automobile and truck repair facilities require a Conditional Use Permit. Lot Area Requirements The proposed site is 2.72 acres in size. The site is comprised of what was originally platted as Lot 2 and Lot 3. Building B is proposed to extend across the property line separating lots 2 and 3. Approval of the project will require the combination of the two lots and vacation of an existing drainage and utility easement. The original PDO was granted to allow for design flexibility on the site. The overall site design was intended to provide integration of uses lying south of Apollo Drive. The proposed buildings will be under common ownership and an existing operation and maintenance agreement is in effect across all the lots. The existing drainage and utility easement is not needed for public purposes. Therefore, staff does not find any issues with the necessary lot combination and easement vacation. Setback Requirements Principle Building Parking Lot Required Proposed Required Proposed Apollo Drive 50 feet 75 feet 15 feet 15 feet I35W 50 feet 30 feet* 15 feet 75 feet Private Access Road N/A N/A N/A N/A Side Yard 10 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Rear Yard 30 feet 30 feet 5 feet 75 feet * Per PDO Master Plan • • • Planning & Zoning Board Meeting JADT — Lot 1 & Lot 2 August 13, 2003 Building Materials The JADT project was originally approved to replicate and conform with the design guidelines in place for the Lino Lakes Marketplace complex to the north. The proposed building materials consist of concrete masonry units (CMU) and E.I.F.S. accents, along with accentuated building corner and cornice details. The proposed building materials, colors, finishes and accents are in conformance with Marketplace design guidelines and similar to the existing JADT building located on Lot 4. Building Height. The maximum allowable building height is 45 feet. The proposed building measures 34 feet at the highest parapet (roof height 18 feet). The building height is in conformance to district standards. Landscaping. In accordance with site and building plan submission requirements, a landscape plan has been provided for review. A master landscape plan was reviewed and approved in conjunction with the JADT plat approval. The proposed plan includes overstory trees consisting of Swamp White Oak, Bur Oak, Northern Pin Oak, and Northern Red Oak to be planted around the perimeter of the site and in one large island located in the parking lot. Shrubbery, consisting of Compact Winged Euonymus and Dwarf Japanese Yew, is included around the perimeter of the buildings and in one smaller island located in the parking lot. The proposed landscape plan is in general conformance with the master landscape plan. However, additional landscaping should be provided around trash enclosures so that they are more fully screened. Additionally, plan proposes to remove two existing Oak trees located within the vicinity of the parking lot island, located on the western side of Lot 2. The island should be redesigned to preserve the existing trees. Green Area. The maximum allowable impervious surface coverage is 75 %. The proposed impervious surface coverage for Lot 2 is 55.9% and 69.5% for Lot 3. The site is in conformance with district requirements. Access Circulation. Primary access to the site is from the private street located just east of the adjacent McDonald's site, via Apollo Drive. The project does provide an additional connection to the existing Lot 4 development, which accesses directly onto Apollo Drive. Parking. Automobile Repair facilities require two parking stalls per service bay, with a total of six stalls required for the proposed facility. In addition, the office component of the facility (450 sq.ft.) will require an additional 3 stalls. Retail facilities require one stall per 200 sq.ft. of building space. A total of 87 stalls are required for the site, with 102 proposed. The difference between the required and proposed stall figures provides for potential uses that may have a slightly higher parking demand than standard retail and services uses. • • • Planning & Zoning Board Meeting JADT — Lot 1 & Lot 2 August 13, 2003 Lighting. A photometric plan was submitted and is consistent with ordinance requirements. Four pole- mounted lights with shoebox fixtures are proposed around the perimeter of the site, with a double - mounted pole light to be located in each of the two parking island areas. Fixture details for these lights meet requirements. Wall pack light fixtures are proposed for the building. Such fixtures will need to contain a cutoff that directs the light downward at a ninety (90) degree angle. Signage. Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. A separate master signage plan will need to be submitted for the site. Trash. Trash will be stored in an enclosure located south of the building. The enclosure will be constructed with concrete masonry units (CMU) to match the principle building and equipped with painted metal panel doors. Landscaping should be increased around the periphery of the enclosure to achieve better screening. Utilities. Water and Sanitary sewer service were provided to service the site as part of the Lake /Apollo Drive improvement project. A utility plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer. All modifications as set forth in the City Engineers memo, dated August 8, 2003, will need to be addressed prior to final approval. Stormwater Management. A grading and drainage plan has been submitted for review by the City Engineer. A master grading and drainage plan was submitted as part of Preliminary Plat approval and much of the required infrastructure has been constructed. The grading and drainage plan does propose to modify the existing pond located in the northwest corner of the site and to more efficiently utilize the site area. These revisions will require additional review and approval from Rice Creek Watershed District. As a condition of plan approval, the grading and drainage related modifications and comments set forth in the City Engineer's memo, dated August 8, 2003, should be satisfied Additionally, due to the proposed location of the larger retail building, an existing drainage and utility easement will need to be vacated. The existing easement was dedicated as part of the original plat, and is no longer required. Conditional Use Permit The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance lists automobile and truck repair as a conditional use in the GB district. For the purpose of this permit the proposed use shall be classified as "Automobile Repair — Minor," as defined in Section 1, Subdivision 2.B (under "Commercial Use ") of the Zoning Ordinance: • Planning & Zoning Board Meeting JADT — Lot 1 & Lot 2 August 13, 2003 "An establishment providing goods or services related to automobiles such as car washes, repair businesses limited to minor engine repair, fluid changing, tire service and muffler repair and other uses of similar character, but not including uses defined as a major automobile business or automobile sales." The proposed use is subject to the following criteria: a. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence. Comment: The proposed architectural appearance and functional plan of the building is consistent with the original JADT requirements. b. The entire area other than occupied by buildings or structures or planting shall be surfaced with bituminous or concrete which will control dust and drainage. The entire area shall have a perimeter curb barrier, a storm water drainage system and is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Comment: The proposed use satisfies these requirements. • c. All buildings shall provide an interior location for trash handling or an enclosed trash receptacle area in conformance with the following: • 1) Exterior wall treatment shall be similar and/or complement the principal building. 2) The enclosed trash receptacle area shall be located in the rear or in a side yard which is not abutting a street. 3) The trash enclosure must be in an accessible location for pick up hauling vehicles. 4) The trash enclosure must be fully screened from view of adjacent properties. Comment: Trash will be contained within an enclosure meeting the above requirements. d. All painting must be conducted in an approved paint booth. All paint booths and all other activities of the operation shall thoroughly control the emission of fumes, dust or other particulated matter so that the use shall be in compliance with the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota Regulation APC 1 -15, as amended. Comment: Not Applicable. No painting will be conducted on site. • • • Planning & Zoning Board Meeting JADT — Lot 1 & Lot 2 August 13, 2003 e. The emission of odor by a use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota regulations APC, as amended. Comment: To be included on Conditional Use Permit. f. All flammable materials, including liquids and rags, shall conform with the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. g. Comment: To be included on Conditional Use Permit. All outside storage shall be prohibited except the storage of customer vehicles waiting for repair. Comment: To be included on Conditional Use Permit.. h. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served by modifying the conditions. Comment: To be included on Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the proposed Site Plan is consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance. The proposed Auto Repair facility is sufficiently incorporated into the overall site. Staff recommends approval of the CUP subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 2 and Lot 3 shall be combined into a single parcel. 2. A revised Landscaping Plan shall be submitted that provides additional landscaping around the trash enclosures to create better screening. The parking lot island along the western side of Lot 2 shall be modified to preserve the existing trees if possible. 3. Lighting fixture details that conform to requirements shall be submitted for the proposed wall pack lighting. 4. A master sign plan shall be submitted for review and approval. 5. All grading and drainage modifications be satisfied, as outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated August 8, 2003. 6. The existing drainage and utility easement between Lot 2 and 3, as dedicated on the approved plat, shall be vacated in accordance with State and Lino Lakes requirements. 7. The Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to uses classified as Automobile Repair — Minor defined as an establishment providing goods or services related to automobiles such as car washes, repair businesses limited to minor engineer repair, fluid changing, • Planning & Zoning Board Meeting JADT — Lot 1 & Lot 2 August 13, 2003 tire service and muffler repair and other uses of similar character, but not including uses defined as a major automobile business or automobile sales." 8. The emission of odor by a use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, Minnesota regulations APC, as amended. 9. All flammable materials, including liquids and rags, shall conform with the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. 10. All outside storage shall be prohibited except the storage of customer vehicles waiting for repair. 11. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request, finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served by modifying the conditions. 12. The applicant shall enter into a Site Performance Agreement with the City. ATTACHMENTS 1. General Location Map 2. City Engineer's Comments 3. Master Site Plan, dated 7- 14 -03. 4. Master Planting Plan, dated 7- 14 -03. 5. Planting Plan, dated 7- 14 -03. 6. Photometric Lighting Plan, dated 7- 14 -03. . 7. Exterior Elevations (Building A), dated 7- 14 -03. 8. Exterior Elevations (Building B), dated 7- 14 -03. • i ek. � vvg ...... gri-r..., , ■ .r �oii4 var Bug ,�N A! i�iii!iii BB _�rya_RWI!- FMMF+OF MM1'PIAi NNMBER -i!' �w����ll� ®,I.�Y- m��2''� a a BM WI iliglfr Cm®DI= ,■ ,r - ©,,1�r YR �VR° €�, -en Marlin. Li' P� _.. D �� � eDAeEiQ� NE � E7v ��P /z I° NA l'4,1V,d6EPrittito u d' • . y� m E a�cc ©eQm ©-o v , ogg■©og0000 er-1P1 a"11 �0000000io��moomo��mmm -e� : ter. ®iitionlot wo® 111161111111Metillii lii oo own rilitt4 111 1 Van ` 1 �t amp . �a53� • Fit ani'MPIE=1 1r47r" IN AR �! �n KEIT / e for maw mar i ,0 Ay, NORTH LAKES REHABILITATION CENTER GEORGE • Memorandum DATE: August 8, 2003 TO: Mike Grochala FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: JADT Addition Attached is the TKDA design review dated August 7, 2003, of the submitted documents for the proposed design of the above - mentioned project. The project is in general conformance with previous reviews and with the City of Lino Lakes standards. Note, however, revised storm water computations have not been received. • Approval can be given following completion of the items listed on the attached memorandum and adjustments necessary for the shift in the property line layout. Please contact me with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 • Fax: 651 -982 -2499 • TDD: 651- 982 -2410 TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: JADT Commercial Site Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink Date: August 7, 2003 Comm. No. 12701 -002 Routing: Review correspondence for this proposed development was previously provided in memorandums to the City dated May 6, 2003, April 9, 2003, and February 28, 2003. The following documents have been provided for this review: • Architectural Plans prepared by KKE Architects and dated July 14, 2003 (Site Plan, Planting Plan, Landscape Details, Lighting Plan, Building Floor Plans, and Exterior Building Profiles). • Preliminary Plans prepared by Ryan Engineering, dated July 14, 2003 (Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Site Plan, Preliminary Grading Plan, and Preliminary Utility Plan). The proposed development plans have generally been previously reviewed as part of a larger development plan. Much of the required infrastructure is already in place. The plans presented herein for review (Lots 2 and 3) generally fall within the bounds of previous reviews. The following additional comments are provided based upon the information received: 1. Previous review memorandums and correspondence have responded to ponding and drainage design for the site. Revised stormwater computations reflecting the proposed stormwater pond design as shown per the plans received must be provided. 2. Pond emergency overflow locations and elevations must be provided on the plan. In addition, the grading plan should also be reviewed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation since stormwater is entering the wetland that borders I -35W. Revised storm water calculations must demonstrate that the 100 -year flood elevation of the existing wetland will not change. 3. The Rice Creek Watershed District must also review and approve the revised stormwater revisions. 4. It is recommended that a fire hydrant be added at or near the property line between Lots 1 and 2. The number and location of hydrants shall be subject to review and approval of the City Fire Chief. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • / PROJECT (7/ ) c=9.) cm 4,41• or Trr. SITE B 59,444 sq. c CD CD CD APOLLO DRIVE CD CD u U- IIIIIIIIIII LOT 4 70 CARS g GISION — TUNE 2880 5F r % / / /rrr N / i ;:4i //r /1 // , -f/ LOT`1 i / 0,/ 12.000 5F /h� � V `?3 ,gyp 5F1 :2-.7') /:::::::::= /Ci1� rte. • . -.„ / 'j PONV ,_-' 69,1- �2 sq 4: ?e3,lxsm ,ice -"` - 7 -/ 35V$ '_5- P) Ill ASTER SITE PLAN 50' 0' 25' 50' 100' ISeaphk .�xako S:2=0" NORTH KK1 . architects minneapolis newport beach dell/re KKE Architects, Inc. 300 flret avenue north ndnneapolla, nn 65401 612/339 -4200 612/342 -9267 fax JADT DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE DRAWING INDEX L101 MASTER SITE PLAN L201 MASTER PLANTING PLAN 1301 PLANTING PLAN L401 NOT USED L501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS / 1601 PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING PLAN /VED JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES No. Date Revision Description 7.14-03 CITY SUBMITTAL LINO LAKES RETAIL - LOT 2 & 3 Lino Lakes, MN Master Site Plan Project Date Drawn by Checked by 0709.1038.01 Drawee Number July ‚- ° L -101 KA C.m'l$M c 2O b, cc1 •rdw,mt • It / � ll CD CD APOLLO DRIVE /-.✓ /rrT. / 1/ /�, / / '�/`.,.,.. / / / % %%/ \ / / > >j '"' LOT 1 /' %�T >T /4./4-,..,/,,,--,"' sue. ��`±i ' �"- jib 42/ / / y.� ybi /1;4, y' /y/ FUTURE / •• O5` \ ,� *, RETAIL CV., (05n(�oo.SF) 00/ 12aoDsr,' ./` Ri `" ls� •/ -�1 / / , PON sr �sJ TAININS MALL WITH GUARD RAIL 5EE CIVIL /- „ct'_e. 3 T 4 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN / / / / ----- ' /' /' / - / - s5-* TREE INVENTORY NO SIZE TYPE SAVED LOST 1 8" BOXELDER X 2 8" BOXELDER X 5 8" BOXELDER X 4 8" BOXELDER X 5 20" POPLAR X 6 6" BOXELDER X 7 4" ELM X 8 4" ASH X • 9" ELM X 0 21" OAK X I 58" OAK X 2 22" OAK 3 6" CHERRY 4 5" CHERRY 5 15" OAK 6 12" OAK MASTER PLANTING PLAN 50' 0 25' 50' 100' TS-ga5k.. -xo/s /' _ 50=0' • KKaI architects minneapolis newport beach dallaa KKE Architects, Inc. 300 first avenue north mtaneepoRs, mn 55401 812/339 -4200 812/342 -9287 fax JADT DEVELOPMENT TM I RECEIVED JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES No. Date Revision Description 7.14-03 CITY SUBMITTAL LINO LAKES RETAIL - LOT 2 &3 Lino Lakes, MN Master Planting Plan Oats Drew, by Checked by 0208,058-01 Drawing Number "14,�AJ4 L -201 Cc otAt s 2001 by IKE Mdiecµ Fc ) • • / 4 '►q�w • ' TYf Ir SITE B ...;_NIF,._ 59,444 sq. ft�'�� .• Ea EN NM NB e- AAUP RECISION TUNE 2880 SF 1 0,2, CARS TRASH ENCLOSURE ball lull ❑ee❑■- 4a Al& 44i :fee V. / / �\ 1, //,�� , n VY 6 ) it 1 le:ti 0y lagrimmusarml i._,rAe Ell Nkt RETAIL 'B' 13.E 8.600 SF MITIGATION >1- ginumirirfinniiinm faf.mmafaur moo I 8)4 7> 11/ `i PLANTING PLAN 30' 0' 15' 30' 60' 6icio'/it Seale /' = 30=0' Landscape Legend Deciduous Trees Symbol Toll Shrubs 0 Botanical Name/ Carmen Name Over.* bicolor Snare rAll. Oak Root 512e Montity Container 0u.reus ellipsoidal's Northern Pin Oak Mertes macr0a0 -po Bur Oak (Meru. mare Northern Red Oak Euorynue °Iota 'COmpoct.' 0°P0 °ct Winged Euaylw* 'breading Evergreen Turf Taxes cuspidate, Nand O y Japans Yen Container (5 Gallon Container 5 )Gallon ( 14 10 (Balled/ Bvlaped Copper 12 Balled/ Burloped 9 4 )Ton ( Perennial Rye5rass Sod Pond Area 6ronses/Pa b.s Normal Pond Elevation - 1 Yea- Nigh bobs" Elevation r Pond Otto erosses/Forbes Ill 1 rear High ybt.r Elevation - Top Of Pond Upland Neo 6ras*es/Parbes Surrounding Pond s Other Restoration MOOS Ronk Mulch Surrounding Pont Other Restoration Areas A- Gallon Container 1' Tall 30 Sod Rolls Stagger) Rolls 21,065 5.E' 146 Acres 6r.es Forbes Seed 15 -16 bs. 1 -5 lbs. /oars 3,344 SF. 06 Arras 6r.ss Forbes Seed 15-I6 I -5 -5 lbs. /acre 41134 5F. .23 Acres dress e.t.a Seed 1-5 I bs.) 5- lbs. 10.464 5F. ,24 Acres doss Forbes 5sed 15-16 bs. 1 -5 lbs. /ones S 684 02 Ac.P. re KK1 • architects minneapolis newport beach dallas KKE Architects, Inc. 300 first avenue north misneapod', nit 55401 812/339 -4200 812/342 -9287 fax JADT DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF LIN0 LAKE'S No. Date Revision Descliptan 7 -14-03 CITY SUBMITTAL LINO LAKES RETAIL - LOT 2 & 3 Lino Lakes, MN Planting Plan Project Efate Drawn by 0206.1036.01 Drawing Number "1427.3L-301 Checked by KA 5amadn s 1002 01 520 • MCGRAW- EDISON° VXMVISION 100 -400. 04. 41.4.1 31.40 MCMTECnrn.t .new • x.,r� +114wdm Ira • ^0911141.191 11 e.3 'AaWnla c neal4ln a and a . o a.7D41n • n.47 of artli- .wnleabra • 9.4.414.4 rep runs• x.0 p4191, 4.303. nrtl-an'am fixtur• 3110 • o0n>34namr.saMoy F lo4BY • ran"mn 1411 a •.x,214 or ainae4aeo4 • Ban. me rcl.l.e 404.10 201407 • '' ,.i440xm:37v4e 114.1.24.04. ra13 el 114.1.24.04. • 1xE0 122 WJ NO�F COOPER L1 10140 TN 4.310 13. ara 4.236.33130 EO. xn,tnxfen M Du VXM Imo WV maM'un Idea 00.0w7M 91•34 I1 1n.m,IwrP 1.n 04cl7I4"IM lawn ,VewIng 111.. PAAVng .4,1M c41014l fir 4.4n bueala VX 3 Y.. -000 3 Mw F MT" al7Z» Nan. Br 131443.44.1103 ■■■ ■■■■■ Imegiesamo NNE Mt Si Wen! ■■,MTME11■■ ■ •11Vyts ■■■ ■■ •■ ■•■■■■ w -,E. as 403W. MI 7.3 34 714,21. 561 an 1711.17 a• or 10•SB.47B 1.1T 10• SB.TAF on Tat -n TYPE M TYPE 0 :W-. 1.. =- 1. , 4..4e.4 4 iw .'e'~ri.u. nom 4.4.14.44444 ..arn•.� :�m..�s'.".. wn..:... r. �: r.,'6:.�....,..d.aw..�......... m.r...r..e.. 10.4, q• 55 -61 on 7111• 17 Ir SE -Tne -O TYPE Z TYPE V lrse417B. 7 o I'21B- 11To.tA I0' 50 :10 aA 10. .1 TRANSFORMER BASES When ordering a pole with a transformer base, the total mounting height includes Ne trans TYPE F TYPE 0 TYPE M TYPE 0 B•,B•.o,rnB& rorr Tea tr TI.I MST DECORATIVE BASES DETAIL ?ii View of R 0••Ipn B•• t« .o 1; 46.14003.444.4. e3 00^.99. M nna. a.•ww. nndn a334 4. n y ue 0 1 `.H NO - ex H•narfrl• 4110. aw4 0a.n10O anecll1 110.11. C1nl. above ancrwr boh IP.000 N1Mmion 11B.B4n01Men,lw:, 0•011 DIae417, HAS. 01.n04n • u VT._ 44 _..43 L S `` " y N u y y 3 y y u . u 3 . u u . u u M u . 3 . u 3 u 3 3 u as " " " U U U U U U U U U U U Oa R.- .44_ MI at 47 -634 4.7 67 al 044-4 UUUUUU 11.1.64 "NILO 4143.11131431 lb-existing t u u 54 " u ./ u -'" •.+- Y- W. .L•41_ 91 3 u y !, u u y u u u u u u u " 0 at u y 3 y 3 u u u /4. 43 63 4.4 . . 22 ,7 4 63 0 S /74. 2 41 LI 4.1 e4 64 OA lb 3 ONEy11 yy LI 13 14 14 La 13 ;WV..✓ " .. ISGTE .B. 31448 sq.ft \,k .. 3 1" Y u y u 3 u 3 3 u " 3 �� /y u " 47 IS MI 4 a1 3 y u !� N WI 46 V OA 44 03 NIB RN BS 14 83 = =::�:� architects 40 y minneapolis newport beach dalles " "; 00 00 14 i: µ 12 Architects, Inc. " " ® 300 first avenue north minneapolia, um 55401 . 612/339 -4200 612/342 -9267 $a* 63 el It 13 44 u 3 u 3 1. 3 u `.E u ` u u a. 6130 Blue Cycle Br Ste. 100. Minnetonka, IN 55343 y\ Ph 952-217-5400 Fox 952 - 905-0000 3 :: u " �+ N sepredu t con ,l i y" /u y u y y 454197 Bq tP Oast u /3 3 u u 3 u 4ncr.i! \� A 44 .f LI 3 3 vin Of It 33 fa 14 14 AS 3.11 1 34 all 33 33 31 , 12 4, 3 " 3 at u1 u .3\ 11 u!7' " ty/1 N 144 at 4, as y/ • 3 ., y 3 3 13 a to la LP 43 LS 1.3 31 u 3 3 at 3 y4\ u/ �. 1147 ., ay 3 LP 3 LI V as 3 43 33 43 4 WANCIRIPPW Isting JADT DEVELOPMENT PULSE TM 14 14 NOTES: Specifmtlons and dmensbna subject to change without notice. O CagbMm0312 2L91Q11NIg2l4t AEdpeyyma. Cown4Nas ORdaYnv we Ran, Kw.... Yoakum N ..� 40 .p • 3" i� $50 ATlO5 .6 u u a• MI i1GATION - u' u y y L r y� -" L ./..- ED JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES Luninolre Schedule Project: All Projects Symbol Oty 4 Lobel la- existing Arrangement Lumens LLF Description SINGLE 32000 0.700 3 2 ib- exl5tlno 2b- existing SINGLE 32000 0.700 BACK -BACK 32000 0.700 2 le SINGLE 32000 0.700 2 lb SINGLE 32000 0.700 5 26 BACK -BACK 32000 0.700 McGraw- Edison VXM- 400- MH -X -4F C30' ntg) McGraw - Edison VXM- 400- MH -X -35 <30' ntg) McGraw- Edison V014- 400- MH -0 -3S (30' ntg) McGraw - Edison VXM- 400-MH -0 -4F (30' 9118) McGraw - Edison V054- 400- HH -X -35 (30' ntg) McGraw- Edison V014- 400- MH -X -3S <30' nip) Lunino re Location Sunni Project: All Projects SegNo Lobel 0 Y Z Orient Tilt 19 lb-existing 3064 -141 30 340.346 0 23 26- existing 3076 -254 30 154.983 0 24 26- existi19 3172 -301 30 154.983 0 30 lb- existing 3212 -153 30 240.945 0 42 26 3023.5 -363 30 61.783 0 43 2b 3129 -418 30 61.783 0 44 2b 2976 -459 30 61.783 0 46 to 3232 -434 30 0 0 48 to 3595.5 -288 30 180 0 57 la- existing 4046 -202 30 180 0 34 lo- existing 3656 -229 30 90 0 35 la-existing 3875 -233 30 90 0 36 lb- existing 3744 -176 30 270 0 38 la- existing 3960 -234 30 90 0 52 lb 3524.5 -155 30 270 0 53 lb 3361 -216.5 30 306.87 0 55 26 3426 -295 30 0 0 56 26 3314 -349.5 30 0 0 Statistical Area Summary Project: All Projects Lobel Avg Max Min Avg /Min Max /Min Lot 1 2.29 7.5 0.2 11.45 37.50 Lot 2 2.03 7.3 0.3 6.77 24.33 Lot 3 1.77 6.6 0.3 5.90 22.00 Photometric Lighting Plan 30' 0' 15' 30' 60' • D. • NORTH No. Date Revision Desoiptian 0714-03 aTY SUBMITTAL LINO LAKES RETAIL - LOT 2 &3 Lino Lakes, MN Photometric Lighting Plan Project Data Drawn by Checked by 0 7 0 8103 9 01 Duwi9 Number ''42: L -601 C.plgla c TW1In EIa 04.013 c • • MATERIALS KEY EIFS -1 EIFS -2 DRYVIT - BUOCSKIN DRYVIT - SANDLEM000 BEI6E W. C741.1 (BASE) CH/-2 (FIELDI C4 -3 (ACGe1T) ANCHOR - SADDLE •A16 - BURNISHED A■CNDR - CEDAR .420 - ROGKFACE ANCOO - PINTER /MITE •301 - SMOOTH L7 PETAL COPING R METAL CORNS .2 ALLNIN.M STOREFRONT LNA -CLAD - ALMOND INA -CLAD - HARTFORD DARK BRONZE ANODIZED - --"M'- e , 11D'•B' T MASON A PPL. Y 100• -O• ALIAMNM / 6LA56 OVERHEAD DOORS RTH ELEVATION PREFIN. MIL. COPM6 •1 TYP. T011) 1250' -0 8 J. EJFS. - 1 COLORS MOO. ALUM. STOREFRONT INTEGRALLY COLORED all PIERS (4' HIEN BLOCK) ■ f. 100' -O'er \\*...."----INTE6RALLY COLORED CM BASE (5 HI6H BLOCK) PREFIN. MTL. COPW6 •1 TYP. MOD. ALUM. STOREFRONT INTEARAU.Y COLORED CM PIERS (4' H16N 81.00K) A FPE. Y HOD'. TENANT TEN 41T I�3 CANVAS AMMO CANVAS AFMN6 iii CANVAS AMENS CANVAS ASIANS INTEGRALLY COLORED CM BASE (8• HIGH BLOCK) ST ELEVATION 116•.1'-0' PREPIN MTL. COPING .1 TYP. .�L TO-DS YI20' ' !u0 GIPS. - 2 COLORS MOD. ALUM. STOREFRONT — INTEGRALLY COLORED CMN PIERS (4' HIGH BLOCK) Y loo' -O. fi PRE �I ION TUNE CANVAS AMENS INTEGRALLY COLORED CHl BASE (6• HASH BLOCK/ SOUTH ELEVATION Ara WY *ILO' °EAST ELEVATION A3a MALL PACK LIGHT FIXTI1RE T.ON_AS 11O8'' -NRYY 8' P.P.E. JJ� 100' -0• PRECISION TUNE 1r TQ.M5I RYA I18' -O -O' KK ary architects mInneapolis newport beach dallas IGCE Architects, Inc. 300 tint ensue North minneapolh, Mm 55401 612/339.4200 612/342 -9267 lax JADT DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 Hereby certey that tins plan, speciflcat1on or report nos prepared by ins or under my d-ect supervision. aid that 1 an a duly Licensed Architect older the law of the State of Hae.ob. Printed Nora, 114K AMDAL 3lgature, Date. Llcento •.1411 Date Revision Desaipticn 74403 CRY SUBMITTAL LINO LAKES RETAIL - LOT 2 & 3 Lino Lakes, MN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING "A" FFE. AA hoject 0106bBDT9 Drawing lEen16N 100' -0' Y Due Dom by .1+tJ 14.2031. A301 Checked b4 08 Cwr.5* 3100 M Of Aie.4 ec • • • L PRECI a N TUN L7 TEN A k Lai . _� imil mom as- i�� =���� cA.NVAS AFNIl CANVAS AWNS �o �m� lug elfin, 1111 ALIAMNM / 6LA56 OVERHEAD DOORS RTH ELEVATION PREFIN. MIL. COPM6 •1 TYP. T011) 1250' -0 8 J. EJFS. - 1 COLORS MOO. ALUM. STOREFRONT INTEGRALLY COLORED all PIERS (4' HIEN BLOCK) ■ f. 100' -O'er \\*...."----INTE6RALLY COLORED CM BASE (5 HI6H BLOCK) PREFIN. MTL. COPW6 •1 TYP. MOD. ALUM. STOREFRONT INTEARAU.Y COLORED CM PIERS (4' H16N 81.00K) A FPE. Y HOD'. TENANT TEN 41T I�3 CANVAS AMMO CANVAS AFMN6 iii CANVAS AMENS CANVAS ASIANS INTEGRALLY COLORED CM BASE (8• HIGH BLOCK) ST ELEVATION 116•.1'-0' PREPIN MTL. COPING .1 TYP. .�L TO-DS YI20' ' !u0 GIPS. - 2 COLORS MOD. ALUM. STOREFRONT — INTEGRALLY COLORED CMN PIERS (4' HIGH BLOCK) Y loo' -O. fi PRE �I ION TUNE CANVAS AMENS INTEGRALLY COLORED CHl BASE (6• HASH BLOCK/ SOUTH ELEVATION Ara WY *ILO' °EAST ELEVATION A3a MALL PACK LIGHT FIXTI1RE T.ON_AS 11O8'' -NRYY 8' P.P.E. JJ� 100' -0• PRECISION TUNE 1r TQ.M5I RYA I18' -O -O' KK ary architects mInneapolis newport beach dallas IGCE Architects, Inc. 300 tint ensue North minneapolh, Mm 55401 612/339.4200 612/342 -9267 lax JADT DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 Hereby certey that tins plan, speciflcat1on or report nos prepared by ins or under my d-ect supervision. aid that 1 an a duly Licensed Architect older the law of the State of Hae.ob. Printed Nora, 114K AMDAL 3lgature, Date. Llcento •.1411 Date Revision Desaipticn 74403 CRY SUBMITTAL LINO LAKES RETAIL - LOT 2 & 3 Lino Lakes, MN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING "A" FFE. AA hoject 0106bBDT9 Drawing lEen16N 100' -0' Y Due Dom by .1+tJ 14.2031. A301 Checked b4 08 Cwr.5* 3100 M Of Aie.4 ec • • • �D.STUD Y ITs6'-H' A TA.STIJD �Na• -eT T 4' S•4• T.O.STUD I34' -0- 17-7 I7 •2• PREFIX. • NS •2 •TYP• • -D AREA S'•4' 7' -4 PREPRX, MTL. COMM •1 E1F3 RIVEN. - TYP NOTE. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE/TOP OP SW-TYP. $121 D T-ST U2 4 RTH ELEVATION CANVAS MOMS *AXED PORTION OF Bu1LDINS - STRAI6IR!NED FOR CLARITY U6'-e' PREFIX MIL. COPSN6 •2 74IUD' -,5 O'Y .IFS. ALIFL STOREFRONT INTl6RALLY COLORED CM) MRS (4' POOH BLOCK) INTE6RALLY COLORED CM) SAS! (e• 11617 BLOCK) 100' -0• Va•.I• -0. FALL PACK LtSNT FIXTURE RTHWEST ELEVATION BACK OP PARAPET BEYOND AA 40HASONRY OVERPL0R SCUPPER THAEST ELEVATION VD'.I• •O' MALL PACK LIGHT FIxTLR! •RN.L PACK LISHT FIMIRE BACK OP PARAPET BEYOND OVERFLOV SCUPPER } PREEN. MIL. TD MASONR _ bYCOMB H2O-e - p— CORNICE BEYOND CANVAS AFNIN6 — SPANDREL SLA55 INTESRALLY COLORED CM) PIERS (4. 116H BLOCK) INTEGRALLY COLORED CM) BASE (5• HIEN BLOCK) MALL PACK LI6NT FIXTURE THEAST ELEVATION MALL PACK LIMIT FIXTURE VS•.1• -0. RTHEAST ELEVATION TDTI_ 7 12$6' --6Y T •ib-& - ue• -e• F -0• MATERIALS KEY `.. IlPS -I !IFS-2 DRYVIT • /ICKSKIN DRYVIT - SANDLEMO70D BE16E y'� 9IA T CrV -I (BASE) CM) -2 (FIELD) CM) -5 (A LEND ANCHOR • SADDLE 1516 • BANISHED ANCHOR • CEDAR 420 • ROC.KPACE ANCHOR - NNTER FAIT! .901 • SMOOTH METAL CORNS .1 METAL COPING .2 ALUMMM STOREFRONT LEIU -CLAO • ALMOND UNA -CLAD • HARTFORD DARK BRONZE ANODIZED Trrrrz KK aTy architects minneapolis newport beach dells KKE Architects, Inc. 300 fhet avenue moth rainseepdie. me 66401 612/339.4200 612/342 -9267 fax JADT DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED JUL 1 4 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 (webs dairy lhot 4NS pint .ped /ICMWU a moped •.•s prepared by IM or mde• ml area s.per`dislaL end Ihat I an o eddy Licensed Aradea Wider B- 0404 or IM Slate or Kroosol0. Printed Nerve, JACK AMPAL Signature: Date L3003, .,17421 No. Date Revision Desaptian 7-14-03 CITY SUBMITTAL LINO LAKES RETAIL - LOT 2 &3 Lino Lakes, MN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDINC "B" lbobct Dam Drawn by a*d,d by 0206.IO59.25 rk.eil1 Nmb.t '14' A302 DO Cog ilit 442001 W Of 4-.14 5s- • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 5H Richard Thompson Automobile and Truck Repair Conditional Use SE Property at the Intersection of Apollo Drive and Lilac Street PIN # 17- 31 -22 -21 -0013 Woodstone Builders is proposing to construct a small strip mall of 15,763 square feet on the SE Property at the intersection of Apollo Drive and Lilac Street. The Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan designates this area as commercial. The Plan states the purpose of the commercial areas is to "provide attractive shopping environments and convenient access to retail goods and services for community residents." The Plan outlines five strategies to promote quality commercial areas: 1. Through zoning and commercial site planning, the City will require new commercial developments to be compatibly designed with surrounding land uses. 2. Site access will be controlled to provide safe traffic movement. 3. The City will promote commercial site designs that emphasize pedestrian accessibility, shared parking, and green space. 4. Architectural and site standards will be developed and applied. 5. Commercial developments will be required to be responsive to the environmental concerns of the City with regard to site planning, landscaping, impervious surfacing, and storm water management. The proposed area is zoned as General Business in the City's Zoning Ordinance. Automobile and truck repair is a conditional use in this District. Conditional uses are granted based on criteria and procedures outlined in Section 2, Subd. 2 of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant, Woodstone Builders, is proposing to construct a small strip mall on the south end of this triangular- shaped lot. The mall would include an auto repair shop of approximately 3,100 square feet with attached retail space to the east of approximately 12,663 square feet. The strip mall and auto repair business would be located on the back side (south) of the lot with parking to the north and south. As proposed, the use would 12701 -001 • have one entrance /exit on Lilac Street (State Trunk Highway 49). Off - street parking would be provided for 70 cars. This review is based upon information contained in the following documents. 1. Drainage Calculations dated June 23, 2003 2. 11 x 17 size Storm Sewer Design Drainage Area Plan dated June 24, 2003 3. Full size Storm Sewer Design Drainage Area Plan dated June 24, 2003 4. 11 x 17 size Site Plan dated June 5, 2003 5. Full size Site Plan dated June 5, 2003 6. Electrical contract dated June 23, 2003 7. 11 x 17 size Plan set (8 sheets) dated June 9, 2003 8. 11 x 17 size Lighting Plan dated June 17, 2003 9. Full Size Preliminary Plat ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Commercial General Business West Industrial Light Industrial North Commercial General Business East Commercial General Business South Commercial General Business The uses as proposed are consistent with the zoning of the area, and the auto repair facility is a conditional use in the General Business District. Setback Requirements Principle Building Parking Lot From Arterial Street From Local Street From Residential District Side Yard Rear Yard Required Proposed Required Proposed 40 Feet 130 Feet 15 Feet 40 Feet 30 Feet 40 Feet 15 Feet 40 Feet 35 Feet 35 Feet 10 Feet 10 Feet 10 Feet 10 Feet 30 Feet 30 Feet 10 Feet 30 Feet The building as proposed meets the setback requirements of the General Business District. 12701 -001 • Lot Area Requirements and Lot Width The minimum lot size required for a sewered lot in the General Business District is 20,000 square feet. The proposed use consists of 70,151 square feet; the proposed use meets the lot area requirements. Minimum lot width for this District is 100 feet. The lot has minimum lot width of 160 feet. The project meets the City's requirements for minimum lot width. Height Requirements In the General Business District, maximum height allowed is 45 feet. The structure as proposed will be approximately 21 feet. The structure as proposed is within the height limitations of the District. Impervious Surface Coverage In the General Business District, the total impervious surface cannot exceed 75 percent of the lot area resulting in less than 25 percent pervious landscaped area. In the proposed development, 35,298 square feet (50.32 percent) of the lot area will be in parking area and 15,763 square feet (22.47 percent) will be in buildings. In total, 72.79 percent of the lot will be covered with impervious surface, or 27.21 percent will be pervious surface. The Proposal, as shown, meets the requirements of the ordinance for impervious surface. Building Requirements The Zoning Ordinance requires that the principal and accessory structures have essentially the same or a "coordinated harmonious finish treatment." (Section 3, 4.B) Exterior walls may be a "combination of materials including brick, pre -cast concrete, decorative concrete, architectural concrete, cast -in -place concrete, stone, glass or metal panels. Metal panels shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the wall surface." (Section 3, 4.C) The majority of the exterior surface of the building will be brick, with some block and doors. The front exterior walls will consist of brick and glass store fronts. A common theme will be carried throughout the structure. Although it is not apparent from the exterior elevations, with the predominance of brick or block, earth tone colors will most likely be the dominant color (Section 3, 4.D). The Developer should provide a color sketch of the structure to assure earth tones and contrasting colors (Section 3, 4.E). Permitted/Conditional Use Retail business, which is proposed for the majority of the structure (12,500 square feet), is a permitted use in the General Business District. Automobile and truck repair are conditional uses in the General Business District. The automobile repair garage must meet the following conditions: 12701 -001 • • 11 The architectural appearance of the buildings and the site shall not be so dissimilar from buildings or the area as to constitute a blighting influence. Since the proposed structures are surrounded by commercial or industrial land use designations, the structure as proposed will complement surrounding uses and not be a blighting influence. 2,1 All buildings shall provide for enclosed trash receptacle area with exterior wall treatments similar to the principal building, in the rear of the building, in an accessible location and fully screened from view of adjacent properties. From the information presented, the trash area appears to match the exterior of the principal building and will be mostly screened from adjacent properties. However, the trash area is adjacent to a public street. It also does not appear to be accessible to trash haulers that will have to somehow turn around either before or after picking up the trash. Excluding the exits from the repair bays of the automobile repair shop and the employee parking behind the retail space, a trash truck would have only 24 feet in which to turn around, which would require many turning movements. In addition, retailers on the east end of the establishment may not find it convenient to carry waste or cardboard 240 feet to the other end of the lot. The Developers should move the trash area to the southeast side of the lot and consider how to provide easier access to the trash area for haulers. All walls surrounding the trash receptacles must be at least six (6) feet in height. The Plans as presented do not indicate the height. 3) Since the intent of the business is auto repair, painting should not be part of the operations of the garage. If it is considered, all painting must be conducted in an approved paint booth. 4) Odor emissions shall be in compliance with MPCA standards, Minnesota regulations APC. 5) All flammable materials shall conform to the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. 6) All outside storage is prohibited, except the storage of vehicles waiting for repair. Accessory Buildings No accessory buildings are proposed on the site. Lighting The Plans include a Lighting Plan along with examples of the types of light fixtures that would be used for the project. In general, the Lighting Plan meets City Ordinances, except three readings exceed maximum intensities allowed. The Developer should work with City staff to assure compliance with lighting requirements. 12701 -001 • Noises • Noises emanating from any use shall be in compliance with and regulated by the MPCA, Minnesota Regulations MPC 7030, as amended, and City code. Waste Material Any waste material resulting from any use must be disposed of in a manner approved by the Minnesota State Fire Marshal, the MPCA, the Department of Natural Resources, and the Zoning Administrator. Landscaping The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance requires that parking areas of six (6) or more spaces shall be landscaped on all sides, that for sites with 50 or more stalls, irrigated landscaped islands or peninsulas or rain gardens shall be provided at a rate of 100 square feet per 25 surface stalls, and that no landscaping or screening shall interfere with drive or pedestrian visibility. A Landscape Plan was presented as part of the overall Plan. The Environmental Review Board reviewed the Plans on July 30, 2003 (See Attachment 1). The Landscape Plan shows 20 larger shade trees and 10 additional smaller trees. The Plan also shows a number of smaller plants including asters, daylilies, hostas, rose and junipers. All sodded areas are irrigated. The Landscape Plan meets the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Off Street Parking The requirements for off - street parking prescribe one off - street parking space for each 200 feet of retail space. The proposal includes approximately 12,580 square feet of retail space, which would result in the need for 63 off - street parking spaces. For auto repair establishments, two spaces per serving bay are required, which results in the need for 6 spaces (3 bays x 2 spaces). Together, the building will require 69 off -street parking spaces. The Developer is proposing 70 spaces including three ADA accessible spaces. There could be conflicts associated with the parking spaces on the northeast side of the parking lot. Incoming cars going southeast through the lot may encounter vehicles backing out of the three northeast parking stalls. Incoming vehicles should be directed to the west of the lot to avoid conflicts. The Proposal meets the requirements of the ordinance. Driveway Access The Zoning Ordinance states that driveways onto arterials and major collectors are prohibited where alternative street access is available. The Comprehensive Plan does not distinguish Lilac Drive as a major collector. For the purposes of this analysis, then, access shall be allowed onto Lilac Street. 12701 -001 • The Zoning Ordinance requires that curb cuts shall not be located less than 30 feet from the intersection of two (2) or more local or minor street rights -of -way. It further states that curb cut/driveway access shall not be located less than 40 feet from one another. Curb cuts shall be a minimum of five (5) feet from the side yard property line. The proposed curb cut in this development enters approximately 100 feet east of Apollo Drive. Without information on the property to the east, it has not been determined whether the driveway meets the 40 foot requirement. The curb cut/driveway as proposed will be approximately 20 feet from the east lot line, which meets the City's standard. Aside from proximity to another curb cut to the east, the proposal meets the requirements of the Ordinance for curb cuts, provided the City designates Lilac Drive as a minor collector. Off Street Loading Section 3, Subd. 6. G. states that any structure that requires the receipt or distribution of materials or merchandise by trucks or similar vehicles, off - street loading space shall be provided. The proposed development includes a substantial amount of space devoted to retail, but it is not apparent that loading areas are designed in. Presumably, they would be in the back, but it appears parking is allotted in back. Loading areas must be designated and included in the design. Design Considerations Analysis of the Site Plan shows that the Developers are attempting to place the maximum amount of development including parking on this space. The roadway on the west side of the auto repair building is narrow, especially given the fact that customers will be driving their vehicles out from the west bay and making a wide arc right turn to leave the premises. At the same time the distance between the southwest corner of the building and the proposed trash receptacle area is about 22 feet. There are many opportunities for accidents in this area. The trash receptacle should be moved to the southeast corner of the site. The back (south) accessway is only 20 feet wide, which will not provide much distance for garbage trucks or delivery vehicles to turn around. Twenty -four feet will not give those trucks much room to maneuver, and will create conflicts with either patrons or employees using the back parking spots. The Developers should either shorten the building and provide a one -way circular access road around the site, or consider widening the service road in back. Additional design consideration should be addressed on the west and south sides of the proposed structure for internal traffic circulation. Utilities • See Engineers report, Attachment 2. 12701 -001 • • Stormwater See Engineers report, Attachment 2. Other Issues On the east side of the property, the boundary between the subject property and the neighboring property is disputed. The applicant has designed the proposed facility within the more conservative line. The two neighbors are addressing this issue. The issue does not affect the issues in this review. Findings 1. That the uses as proposed are consistent with the zoning of the area, and the auto repair facility is a conditional use in the General Business District. 2. - The building as proposed meets the setback requirements of the General Business District. 3. The project meets the City's requirements for minimum lot width. 4. The structure as proposed is within the height limitations of the District. 5. The Proposal as shown meets the requirements of the ordinance for impervious surface. 6. The Developer should provide a color sketch of the structure to assure earth tones and contrasting colors. 7. Since the proposed structures are surrounded by commercial or industrial land use designations, the structure as proposed will complement surrounding land uses and not be a blighting influence. 8. The trash area should be moved to the southeast and adequately screened. The Developers should work with City staff to provide better circulation and easier access for trash trucks and delivery trucks in the rear of the structure. 9. The Developer should work with City staff to assure compliance with lighting requirements. 10. Noises emanating from the structures must be in compliance with and regulated by the MPCA, Minnesota Regulations MPC 7030, as amended, and City Code. 11. Any waste material resulting from any use must be disposed of in a manner approved by the Minnesota State Fire Marshall, the MPCA, the Department of Natural Resources, and the Zoning Administrator. 12. The Landscaping Plan meets the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 13. The proposal meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for off - street parking. 14. Aside from proximity to another curb cut to the east, the proposal meets the requirements of the ordinance for curb cuts, provided the City designates Lilac Drive as a minor collector. 15. Loading areas must be designated and included in the design. 12701 -001 • Required Actions The City Planning and Zoning Committee needs to approve the conditional use permit for the auto and truck repair facility based on conditions included in this review and generated from the public hearing and Planning and Zoning Committee discussion. Recommendations We recommend that the City Planning Commission approve the conditional use subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Developer move the trash area to the southeast corner of the site. 2. That the Developer work with City Staff to provide turn- around areas for trash trucks and delivery vehicles and improve traffic circulation. 3. That the Developer assure compliance with City lighting requirements. ATTACHMENTS 1. General location map 2. City Engineer's memo dated August 8, 2003 3. Site Plan, dated June 9, 2003 4. Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan, received June 9, 2003 5. Utility Plan, received June 9, 2003 6. Site Plan/Landscape Plan, dated June 5, 2003 7. Exterior Elevation, dated June 9, 2003 8. Lighting Plan, received June 17, 2003 12701 -001 8 9 / E." I s � © T .. 4111111011111111141111111 cur'''. C • O �,�f In IN ®A IB ' �Q© Os' 1493:11 7 Id. .03! :ristrag, 0 /sa Eigli ri ��a ° ®��� '. �� tie b; `�► u a :A' =!.RA LANE s Ar4giu ���© ��aan:tl:� ar� � � _ � 0 HA ra wrIciv• ArrositAit Ira KIM* Aiwaiin mew trA*4-mriam-gimam Ne kw Ammo 1-A' aws 21 20 OUTLO Z0 a 13 L 2 3 4 5 LAK E 3 T 8 PARK NORTH LAC- - -STREET- - �I 11 I L KES pr° 2 M� KEIT pLAC • 0.L.0 0.L. % r lAt% OrAdai� AKES i ....... ��6 s , IRIAt i r E.e o o D EV. N / I POLLO A i T q l _ Bb5 /NE55 a NO 2 I / Out /o/ 8 LINO LAKES OUTLOT tEHABILITATIOrl CENTER 0 MARSHAN LAKE 24 ELM -SIN 1 -o 14 13 CINNAMON TEAL COURT �0 dOQOr�ll� 117 12 7 4 8 2O e • Memorandum DATE: August 8, 2003 TO: Mike Grochala FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Apollo Center Attached is the TKDA review dated August 7, 2003, of the submitted documents for the proposed commercial /retail site. The comments on the attached memorandum and confirmation of the easterly boundary line must be addressed prior to final approval given for this project. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651- 982 -2499 • TDD: 651- 982 -2410 TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • • MEMORANDUM To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Apollo Center 1500 Piper Jaftray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: August 7, 2003 Comm. No. 12701 -002 Routing: The proposed Apollo Center project development consists of a retail and auto repair facility, located at the intersection of Apollo Drive and Lilac Street. The size of the property proposed for development is approximately one acre. The following plans and documentation have been submitted to the City of Lino Lakes, and these preliminary review comments are presented based on that submittal: Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Utility Plan, and Details (Sheets Cl, C2, and C3),Woodstone Builders Inc., Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group, Schoell & Madson, Inc., dated June 9, 2003. General 1. Per the plan, a building, garage, and shed all exist on the site. Demolition, removal, and grading of the site will therefore be required. The developer will be responsible for the complete removal of all buildings, foundations, underground and above ground items, capping of any existing utility connections and wells, and removal of any underground or septic systems that may exist. All debris and unsuitable material must be removed from the site. Any material imported to the site must be approved by the City Engineer. 2. The use of an existing driveway access at Lilac Street is proposed. Apollo Drive has since been reconstructed, such that Apollo Drive connects with CSAH 49 (Main Street), and Lilac Street no longer connects to Main Street. The driveway access as shown is therefore acceptable. 3. Drainage and utility easements (10 feet in width) must be provided around the perimeter of the property. 4. No soil or geotechnical report has been provided. It is recommended that the existing site soils and groundwater conditions be reviewed and verified prior to construction. 5. All grading and utility plans must be signed by a Registered Professional Engineer. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Apollo Center Page 2 August 7, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 6. The majority of the site drainage is proposed to be directed to an existing storm sewer located southwest of the site. This routing should be verified against a comprehensive drainage study of the area previously conducted by the City of Lino Lakes, and any additional requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. 7. Apollo Drive is a County (Anoka) roadway(CSAH 12). The plans provide for the extension of utilities and excavation into Apollo Drive. A permit will be required from Anoka County, and all work including excavation, restoration, and traffic control shall meet the requirements of the County. The plans shall include notes to address Anoka County requirements. Grading 1. Because the site area exceeds one acre, the development falls under the new rules requiring an NPDES permit. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining this permit. Silt fence and erosion control measures are provided on the plan. 2. A typical section (pavement section) must be provided for the parking area driveways (bituminous thickness, gravel base thickness, etc.). io3. Any imported topsoil, fill material, or granular materials for roadway and building foundation (material and source) must be approved by the City Engineer. 4. A note shall be provided that any clearing of trees shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of Mn/DOT 2101. 5. A Landscaping Plan must be provided in accordance with City requirements. 6. Note 4 on the Utility Plan shall be supplemented to read, "All utility work shall be performed in accordance with the City of Lino Lakes, City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Specifications, and building permit requirements." 7. A note shall be added stating that, "Turf shall be immediately established upon the completion of all grading work. Turf establishment shall be provided per Mn/DOT specification for sod turf establishment (2575) and for the seed mixture specified (3876), or City of Lino Lakes seed specification as appropriate." 8. All grading shall be confined to the property. No additional runoff from the site shall enter upon neighboring properties. If grading requires any work into the adjoining property, the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining authorization as needed. • Apollo Center Page 3 August 7, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Utility Plan 1. The plan proposes connecting a 6 -inch water service pipe to an existing 21 -inch line on Apollo Drive, and extending an 8 -inch PVC sanitary sewer service from an existing main on Apollo Drive. All sanitary sewer service pipe shall be SDR 26 or Schedule 40. 2. Details provided on Sheet C3 (hydrant, valves, and manholes) shall be replaced by City of Lino Lakes standard plate details. 3. Gate valves shall be Mueller A- 2370 -20 with mechanical joints, meeting AWWA Specifications C500 -61. 4. Apollo Drive must be completely restored to the full satisfaction of Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes. Traffic control during construction must be provided in accordance with the State of Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). • • / / /---"-- „ / // / Too / // / �� // / O / / O / / / / / / LILAC STREET (STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY N.,. 49) n 73 0 PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK L__ L AIL AUTO REPAIR Ar ROOFTOP MECH. INR TYP. TRASH ENCLOSURE (66104 & WU) PROPERTY LIM MONUMENT/PYLON SIGN W 81ALDING SET BACK "5 6' X 6' STRUCTURAL STOOP SIDEWALK Th®EN Cq RETAIL 0 0 FILE COp }' I t \ PARKING SET BACK ;7"'.......,„,,,,, \ '1 ) . . L.jrI C•1 I V • \ ...,,,,.w., : - . �- y, \ BUILDING SETBACK 5' X 4' STRUCTURAL STOOP SITE PLAN 1•=20' -0" `PIANO SE7 BACK 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1" — 20' SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA BUILDING COVERAGE AREA TOTAL GREENSPACE: IAN. 252 TOTAL INPERYTOUS SURFACE AREA: 35,298 S0. FT. (50.32 %) MAX. 752 70,151 S0. FT. (1.61 ACRES) 15,763 50. FT. (22.472) 19,091 50. FT. (27.212) PARKING CALCULATION: STALLS REQUIRED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: PARKING STALL SIZE: 9'X18' DRIVE ISLE: 24' PARKING SETBACK$; 8ULDNC SETBACKS; 15' FROM STREET 30' LOCAL 10' REAR 40' COLLECTOR 10' SIDES 30' REAR 10. 511F5 am 12,523 / 2DO = 63 STALLS ('ARAGF; 3 183 (2/BAY X 3 BAYS) = 6 STALLS 69, NCLUONG 3 ADA ACCESSBLE SPACES 70, INCLUDING 3 ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACES WOODSTONE BUILDERS INC. Apollo Center Lilac St. & Apollo Dr. Lino Lakes, Minnesota Mohagen Hansen Architectural GroLi 1415 E 14710a10 914,1 TN 952.473.1915 wY 200 f�903.470,1010 6147900 49 55391 .0 0961hlu9cc. I HEREBY CERTIFY 114AT THIS PLAN, SPECDICATON OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER W DIRECT SUPERMEN, AND THAT I ANA DULY UCENSED ARCHITECT UNDER 114E UW5 OF THE STATE OF NNNE50TA. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1000 11014GEN, AW REGISTRATION NUMBER: 18074 THE A9CHTECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS A140 OWNERS OF THER RESPECTNE INSTRUMENTS Oi SERMCE AND SHALL RETAIN All 00144014 LAW. STATUTORY ONO OTHER RESERVED RKiUS. NCUAIAG CCPYRI31iT5 OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. N0. DESCRIPTION DATE P604001 NUMBER 03NODWBI DRAWN BY: AAC CHECKED BY: 6 CT3A111 DATE 6943 COMPUTER DIRECTORY: Wood5LOn9Voololple&n SITE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL A1.O GRADING NOTES: I. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' WITHIN TWO WORKING GAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/ CONSTRUCTION, FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA 651- 454 -0002 OR TOLL -FREE: 1- 800 - 252 -1166. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 3. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOIL ENCOUNTERED ON THE SITE WITH EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL. DEBRIS. ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL. STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AND GRANULAR FILL AT LOCATIONS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. 4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLEO IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFIU.ED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 7. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 8. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 9. COMPLETION OF 512E GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS BEING GRADED TO 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION'. BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE SITE PLAN AND PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS FOR LOCATION AND LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 10. REFER TO THE ARCHITECT'S SITE PLAN FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND SITE LAYOUT. 11. REFER TO UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING AND STRUCTURE SCHEDULE. 12. THE MINIMUM GRADED SLOPE FROM EDGE OF BUILDING SHALL BE 6 INCHES IN 10 FEET. 13. FINISHED GROUND AND SOD ELEVATION ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE 6" BELOW FLOOR ELEVATION. SLOPE GROUND AWAY FROM BUILDING A MINIMUM OF 6" IN 10 FEET BEYOND 10 FEET REFER TO PLAN GRADES. 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING AND SLOPING THE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE TO PROVIDE SMOOTH & UNIFORM SLOPES. WHICH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND PREVENT PONDING IN LOWER AREAS. CONTACT ARCHITECT 1F FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO GRADING PLANS ARE REQUIRED. 15. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION. PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES WHICH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. CONTACT ARCHITECT IF FIELD ADJUSTMENTS ARE REQUIRED. 16. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER. LEGEND DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES -ODD 0000000131} DENOTES DENOTES 1.008 a 910.5 1 I BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED CURB TIPPED OUT EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE PROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DENOTES PERCENT OF GRADE DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING DENOTES PROPOSED BUILDING DENOTES EXISTING STORM MANHOLE /CB DENOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE /CB DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS M 1SAWCUT EXISTING CURB AND BLACKTOP. MATCH ALL THICKNESS. GRADE. TYPE OF MATERIAL `A A3 BENCHMARK SPIKE W SOUTH FACE OF POWER POLE ELEVATION- 909.69 (9.0.6.0. 1929) N 89 °14'14" W 132.65 •, LILAC $ REET `STATE TRUNK HIGHW Y NO. 491 ROCK 0 CONSTRUCTION ,�•iii•eR'ws mwmam�µ mmmm +mmmmmmmmm .. ENTRANCE.,.. '61;;;:s. 06:67/ I1 :• :•mm•oo �� �!m!m�m5sl4•m� 1. _ � 17D0 Oo0a0o0ola00000000000000000o 911(64 507.70 B ¢1]1 COB h: iGUTT ad 1•F01.86m6m2 1!m!m!m!m!m!1 4= RE .GRADE. dTCF1 AS. NECESSARY TIPPED OUT CURB 8 / / EMERGENCY RFLOW / N t :r 1filMH 1J RW44906.20 0 O y O 07.0 O O fl. O ; ' 0 4, LV 0 L Z 9A7.0 O 9' CURB O 1, O O O Q 1� O Q907.14/ / O / 07.68 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 06.95 ':CB 1 / IM.906.32, Q x0682 82 RCIM - 106.32 90682' ,r 907.23 1.4907.64 907.2/ / 8 / 906.62 / / 907.4 907.4 X 907.3 927.3 • 9D7.rY FL ELEV.= 908.00 TIPPED OUTJ.y' CURB • 'FL. ELEV.= 908.00 's l 907.7 907. %�• 90 TIPPED OUT .CURB x9073,' X., 907.8 9075 3' CURB CUF-\ • 012 C JRB $ GUT ER: .1`J l I TI I 1 \ • Ta •4 12 ■ A CB 3 0 1 : ) il I 1 906.8 RIMa906.53 4;x i e s� 06.964 612 CURB & MITE � RIM 906.58 � •1. 0d000000na ' aDDa ©DDDDDDDDDEIDDDDODDDaooDDDDDD 000n000n000OD00DDDDDDDDEIOQDaDaoDDDDD= 589°14'14 "E 357.18 0 50X 906.98 F: \Eng\ 63985 \001 \dwg \1100 \GRADING.dwg, 06/09/2003 02:53:01 PM, CalvinT, 1:2.18095 �. 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET TILE CQp 6' WARNING < THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES. CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES. VALVES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING HE SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. WOODSTONE BUILDERS INC. Lino Lakes Retail Lilac St. & Apollo Dr. Lino Lakes, Minnesota Hansen Mohagen MI Architectural JILL Group 1415 E Way ale BNE Tel 952.473.1985 Sui le 200 Foe952.473.I340 Wayzata 148 55391 w.w.maaa9en8oneen.cam SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PUNNING SC4. TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 20580 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 1 626600ONKA, MN 55305 (952) 546 -7601 FAY: (952) 546 -9065 wW W.sch09flmodion.c*m I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY 1.10 OR UNDER MT' DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NUNBER . N0. DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT NUUBER . DRAWN BY: 0602(0 BT: • DATE: . GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN c1 S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 63985 -001 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECT'S SITE PLAN FOR BUILDING AND PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS. 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY. 3. THE UTIUTY CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING PIPE SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING SERVICE CONNECTIONS. 4. ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF UNO LAKES SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 5. 6" WATERMAIN SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI /AWWA CL5I/A21.51 AND C104/621.4. FITTINGS SHALL BE CLASS 250 CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI /AWWA C 110/A21.10 OR ANSI /AWWA CI 53/A21.53. HYDRANTS SHALL BE THE PACER AS MANUFACTURED BY WATEROUS CO. OR APPROVED EQUAL COMPLYING WITH THE THE CITY OF UNO LAKES. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESILIENT SEAT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509. ALL PLUGS. TEES. BENDS AND OTHER THRUST POINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CONCRETE REACTION BACKING OR MEGA LUG. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF 7.5' COVER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C600 AND CONDUCTIVITY PROVISIONS CONFORMING TO ANSI /AWWA C111/621.11. BEFORE BEING PLACED IN SERVICE, THE COMPLETED WATERMAIN SHALL BE DISINFECTED AND FLUSHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA 0651 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 6. SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE 8" AND 6' PVC - SDR -35 UNLESS NOTED DIFFERENTLY. MANHOLES SHALL BE 48" DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -1642 WITH TYPE "B" COVER. MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO AND A MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADJUSTMENT RINGS. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES SHALL BE "KOR -N- SEAL" OR CITY APPROVED EOUAL FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES, CONSTRUCT AN OPENING EQUAL TO THE PIPE SIZE, GROUT AROUND PIPE TO CLOSE OPENING, AND REPAIR STRUCTURE TO CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TYPE OF CONNECTION WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY REQUIRED CITY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FOR CITY ACCEPTANCE. 7. STORM SEWER SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL. CATCH BASINS SHALL BE PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3250 B WITH CURB BOX OR APPROVED EQUAL. MANHOLES SHALL BE FOUR FT. DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -1733 TYPE "C" GRATE IN THE MIDDLE OF PARKING LOTS. MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 2 AND A MAXIMUM OF 4 ADJUSTMENT RINGS. 8. UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (ASTM 0698.78 OR AASHTO 1-99) FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN THREE FEET OF THE GROUND SURFACE AND 100% STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. 9. CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REQUIRES INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. 10. FIELD ADJUST ALL CASTINGS TO MATCH FINAL GRADES. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' WITHIN TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA 651- 454 -0002 OR TOLL -FREE: 1 -B00- 252 -1166. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF UNO LAKES 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. CITY INSPECTORS MUST OBSERVE ALL WORK COMPLETED ON TOWN CENTRE DRIVE INCLUDING REMOVAL OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. EXCAVATION OF TRENCHES, PLACEMENT OF WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER, UTILITY CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING ONES. BACKFILUNG AND PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL. INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVE THE NECESSARY SIGNAGE FOR LANE CLOSURES. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE MMUTCD. INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS, JANUARY 1998. ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH LANE IN EACH DIRECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. 14. THE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAWCUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn /DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 15. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SEWER, WATER AND PLUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITY'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES. COI4NECT TO EXISTING WITf1 INSIDE DROP C9NNECT10N INV.- 896.63 FX. INV.- 883.15 CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" DIP WM WITH 12' x6" _ WETTAP AND 6' VALVE / ■ VE 1 � I, o-L RECEWEP JUN 0 0 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES LILAC S ' REET [STATE TRUNK HIGHW Y. NO. 491 SAWCUT EXISTING CURB AND BLACKTOP n 15" FES INV -905.6 0000ODDDD (30D0E30o00000ooppo 3C30E30 e s1 I • 0 V Q MH 1 1(151■906.20 1NV. - 92.23 N iNV,- 9002.43 E fG f r j•... /;T 0 r 72' 15" RC? I" 1 0 0.30R / Qp O 1"V / 0 / / \" o / h' O 00 / o L_� O 444 3' CURB ENTER / OVERFLOW /SAN -11H 1 RIM -906.5 NV.- 897.26 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 r' O O ` ^f 0 r / O O O O / 0o 40' 8"~ • 0.50% r Hansen Mohagen WI Architectural Group 1415 E Wayzata BIM TM 952.473.1985 S,i14 200 Faz952.473.1340 Wayzata MN 55391 wv.moAagananf,n. can SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PUNNING SOIL TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10580 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE I MINNETONKA, MN 55305 (952) 548 -7601 F80 (952) 546 -9065 - .-ACIgNImOdson.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NUMBER . N0. DESCRIPTION DATE . __.____ 777:7 ,,,., ,.7,,, , INV,.903:01 E INV.- 902,81 W / 6" /45' BEND fir VAL • t5" FES NV. ■905.8 • REMOVE EXISTING STORM ' SEWER PIPE AND GRAVEL - .,DRIVEWAY CB 2 RIM - 906,32 <Q 104' 12 RCP Yip 1W-903.32 ' 72' 8" PVC SOR 35 0 1.1. ...'1 HYDRANT W/ GATE t' VALVE o d / FL. ELEV.= 908.00 6" PLUG PLUG m898.0 FL. ELEV. = 908.00 \ \ \ 4 \ \ CB 3 RIM - 906.53 INV.- 902.64 +CC .€368' 12' RCP 0 0.50% C8 4 RIM - 906.58 INV.- 903.48 ❑ 000000000000000000000000000000000000C1o0E3E30E3 0E3E] C70E70E) ElE) C70000000DE100 000E7000E30E7E700CJ • CONNECT TO EXISTING MH INV.- 901.17 F: \Eng \63985 \001 \dwg \1100 \UTILITY.dwg, 06/09/2003 02:52:23 PM, CQIvinT, 1:2.18095 .l� 0 n 20 40 60 SCALE LEGEND 1 { r YS O 0 • 4- H 0 ■ 8 IN FEET DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING STORM MANHOLE/ CB PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CB PROPOSED FES / FES W /RIPRAP EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED HYDRANT DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVE DENOTES EXISTING HYDRANT Fre COPY WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES. CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. WOODSTONE BUILDERS INC Lino Lakes Retail Lilac St. & Apollo Dr. Lino Lakes, Minnesota Hansen Mohagen WI Architectural Group 1415 E Wayzata BIM TM 952.473.1985 S,i14 200 Faz952.473.1340 Wayzata MN 55391 wv.moAagananf,n. can SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PUNNING SOIL TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10580 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE I MINNETONKA, MN 55305 (952) 548 -7601 F80 (952) 546 -9065 - .-ACIgNImOdson.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NUMBER . N0. DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT NUMBER: . DRAWN BY. CHECKED BY: . DATE: • UTILITY PLAN C2 S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 63985 -001 (STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 49) n n 0 I ,04.4,1-, w.(;r ,o C.GL , /FS:y 44r,o� i of 0 0 0 : ssoltren Nvstas `rvo'‘I SITE PLAN uxx /¢• f' 4 / 0 Gat. r %fi✓? 5 e—d.:.c 1 °c„— F -44/9 . ?%. f tr vpry p�,_w7C /?s7 4. 1 -5. tn: t: _ +'J .!7� : )"744 ._'.jig. / v- ar.=a.L/ SITE DATA TOTAL six AREA 75,021 S0. FT. (132 ACRES) BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 15,763 SO. Ff. (21.0114) TOTAL GREENSPACE: 22,684 SO. FT. (30.24X) MIR. 25X TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 52,337 S0. FT. (69.76X) MAX, 75X PARKING CALCULATION: STALLS REOURED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: PARKING STALL SIZE: 97118' LANE 5101 24' PARKING SETBACKS: 15' FROM STREET 10' REAR 10' 51DES (ME; 12,580 / 200 = 63 STALLS r,,ARAGF• 3183 (2 /BAY X 3 BAYS) - 6 STALLS 69, INCLUDING 3 ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACES 70, INCLUDING 3 ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACES BUILDING SETBACKS: 30' LOCAL 40' COLLECTOR 30' REAR 10' SIDES WOODSTONE BUILDERS INC. Apollo Center Lilac St & Apollo Dr. Lino Lakes, Minnesota Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group 1415 E INY..40 7919 Sub 209 199444. w 55391 7M 951.473.1985 60952.4711340 1 HEREBY CER76Y THAT THIS PUN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY 1111 OR UNDER 41• DIRECT SUPERVISOR, AND THAT 1 AY A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE TANS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 1002 MDLIGEN, AM REGISTRATION NUMBER 18074 THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAM ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRICI4IS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. N0. DESCRIPTION RATE PROJECT NUMBER 031810W61 DRAWN 6Y: S.OUVER CHECKED 8Y: T. MOHACEN DATE: 65.03 COMPUTER DIRECTOR(: Wooe,muV po8o\pR6m SITE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL 1 N 0) A1.0 111111111 V 0 I ,04.4,1-, w.(;r ,o C.GL , /FS:y 44r,o� i of 0 0 0 : ssoltren Nvstas `rvo'‘I SITE PLAN uxx /¢• f' 4 / 0 Gat. r %fi✓? 5 e—d.:.c 1 °c„— F -44/9 . ?%. f tr vpry p�,_w7C /?s7 4. 1 -5. tn: t: _ +'J .!7� : )"744 ._'.jig. / v- ar.=a.L/ SITE DATA TOTAL six AREA 75,021 S0. FT. (132 ACRES) BUILDING COVERAGE AREA 15,763 SO. Ff. (21.0114) TOTAL GREENSPACE: 22,684 SO. FT. (30.24X) MIR. 25X TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 52,337 S0. FT. (69.76X) MAX, 75X PARKING CALCULATION: STALLS REOURED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: PARKING STALL SIZE: 97118' LANE 5101 24' PARKING SETBACKS: 15' FROM STREET 10' REAR 10' 51DES (ME; 12,580 / 200 = 63 STALLS r,,ARAGF• 3183 (2 /BAY X 3 BAYS) - 6 STALLS 69, INCLUDING 3 ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACES 70, INCLUDING 3 ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACES BUILDING SETBACKS: 30' LOCAL 40' COLLECTOR 30' REAR 10' SIDES WOODSTONE BUILDERS INC. Apollo Center Lilac St & Apollo Dr. Lino Lakes, Minnesota Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group 1415 E INY..40 7919 Sub 209 199444. w 55391 7M 951.473.1985 60952.4711340 1 HEREBY CER76Y THAT THIS PUN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY 1111 OR UNDER 41• DIRECT SUPERVISOR, AND THAT 1 AY A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE TANS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 1002 MDLIGEN, AM REGISTRATION NUMBER 18074 THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAM ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRICI4IS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. N0. DESCRIPTION RATE PROJECT NUMBER 031810W61 DRAWN 6Y: S.OUVER CHECKED 8Y: T. MOHACEN DATE: 65.03 COMPUTER DIRECTOR(: Wooe,muV po8o\pR6m SITE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL 1 N 0) A1.0 I FABRIC ABHING YELLOW PREFIN METAL BAFA RED PREEN! METAL BAND IY/ RED NEON BALKER SIGN 3' -0' HIGH 123' -6" LONG SNGLE SCORE 81OCK Oro — ..— MM.M. - - -i1 — iiiiiiiii NORTH ELEVATION BLOCK ALUMINUM 00.. FRONT ROCK FACE BLOCK SNGLE SCORE BLOCK 10'010' UAUNUM /CUSS OVERHEAD D 1/8" = 1. -0` WEST ELEVATION SINGLE SCORE BLOCK I /8" = 1. -0` BRICK SOUTH ELEVATION ':1111111C111111::::=1:-117:42E-3, ROCK FACE BLOCK SINGLE SCORE BLOCK PTD. HOLLOW , DOOR PAINT TO MATCH ADM. SURFACE. I/O" = r-D- • A30 O EAST ELEVATION 1.-o- 1.0.11ARAPE1 120' -0' T.O.PARAPET 11 B' -0' FILE Cipy • 7 A •AyN• ; • WOODSTONE BUILDERS INC Apollo Center Lilac St. & Apollo Dr. Lino Lakes, Minnesota Mohagen i' Hansen A/dTlte mup Group 1415 E Ngmla NIE TN 952.471196! We MO fn 952.171131E 046500e RN 35391 wr.maAOgn6anrn.mm I IEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MNNESOTA NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TODD 001400 N, AM REGISTRATION NUMBER: 18074 THE ARCHITECT 94411 BE DEEMED THE AUTHOR AND OWNERS OF THEN RESPECTNE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN AU. COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND 0THER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF 1HE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. N0. DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT IRAIBER: 63169DWM DRAWN BY: AAJC CHECKED BY: S OW00 DATE: 6447 COMPUTER DIRECTOR: Waad9mne1Aplo1pe6n EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CITY SUBMITTAL N 6) A3.0 Lc co ci 141 L 10 L L L L 11 L L L 13 L L L L L 1 L L L 10 b L Si L L L L L L L } 1a It la 1a 1t b k 1a 1i Li 1a 1a to L L L L L L 13 L to la/ 1s la la 13 123 1a la la 1a 13 1: 10 10 L 1 L 1 la L I U la 1 la 13 h 1. 14 1. 13 13 13 4114 L la L L L L to la 1t la la /l3 14 14 L is Ls 13 L L Its L 1 la L 13 L L 1. la 13 la la 1s r la L Si L L 1.4 la 13 14 f 14 to t0 L L L 1a 13 l3 1!j i3 L 14 L L 1a L L L L la 13 14 /13 la L L L 1a 1a 13 11 1a 1 /29 10 10 11 L 1a 1a Da to 13 L L L L la 13 13 10 11 L L 17 14 l 15 la 1s 1. 13 L L 1a/ la 1a la L L 13 la 12 13 14 to L L L it 110 14 t 17 1.7 15 17 U L L L ir:' 16 la 1.0 It 1s 1s 1a Ls la Ise 13 L. 13 L L L ba la 13 L L L L L L L L L la la `' la 1a L L L L L L L 13 13 1t 1a la 1a 1 L L 1 X L 13,, b la 1a to L L L L L la L L\ 13 13 13 1a L 13 L L 1a la 1s 17 17 17 17 127 la la la la 13 13 1a la L L L 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 3 is , 1. 13 13 14 L L la 13 la + 13 1s 1. 14 11 1, U la is YJ s is to 1s la 1< 19 L 1, t,. 13 1: • 13 14 14 1.3 13 1a 19 r Pea }k • Al 0.9;0817 109110 Lean 4 L 13 13 Tit 1 37 114 14221 28 0 to 13 1s 11 1r es 170 a 3 1 1.a U 13 13 1a la 11s In 111 13 14 L 15 1. 13 L L 13 L 1s la *8 la la la 13 13 17 13 11 la 1a 1s 1.1 1.. la 13 13 11 It 14 U 10 la la 1. 11 14 13 13 is "U tia L L 1 la L L la 1a L la L 13 la J L L 13/17 L L laf l7 L L /13 17 1, L 1.3 19 la 1.3 1. is 1t 1s is 1 la 1.2 1.3 14 la 1s l7 la 1a 13 13 113 la la 13 13 13 10 L 13 SS L L 1a la U b 1s la to la t Aare 11.3 13 t i 1.a Is la ; la G 1. , IA 13 L 1 13 1 1. 13 L L L L L 1, 13 L L L L la 1. 13 L L L - 1. \1a L L L L 14 913 1a L L L 1s 1. a L la L 11 f f ! l 14 1.7 1. is \ L la 1t 11 13 \L 1. la L 1a la 13 la L to 14 L 13 13 1, It i13 L C22 14 12 17 1s la la la la 1a la L 13 la la la l0 l0 la Is 1, la L la 1s la Ls 1a 17 L 13 It 130 l7 la la to la 13 la Is la U U U U u a3 L L, 1, 1. la 14 13 13 1 13 13 14 U 14 L 13 la 1a 14 13 13 13 la u 13 13 13 13 13 la u 113 13 13 1a 1 1s L\ la 11 to L le l3 11 1, 13 la • L tut \is L L la 13 L is 11 L he le L L L L la la L la It la la 1a la • 1a la L L L L L L Scale: I- = 20' -0a L L L L L L L 13 L L L 1s 1, L.. -y.. 743•448 23810e9.44 437799 77..98 ;1 2 1409198 t.LJ M4er41taa 14300 0.707 6 V01.01779100.../a 7749•90 L....,. Ins' t• M 989 to 1.088 itmmtnessonomrsommoimmier=zwom,==. Sift Leo IB.n a #2 want.. L.awiee LuC.tion Sawa." Pea }k • Al 0.9;0817 109110 Lean 4 7 Z a.ia.n Tit 1 37 114 14221 28 0 0 a 37 47 14755 es 170 a 3 1 22 0 18 270 0 55 a 0 14 17 sae 0 a 31 Y 18 9s 0 0 2 1462 jt7y Ia 274 8 7 a 2173 1143 17 270 0 8 a 773 1125 I7 470 0 9 ti 323 4025 10 a 0 10 a� 025 40 17 I813 0 11 0t W 8323 I7 al 0 12 12 171 8525 18 98 0 Apollo Center Lino Lakes, MN 4/I JUN 1 7 2003 CITY OF Li t. LAKES Luria Sales Associates Ligphh7ing ant! Consrtas Eve 12th ..0..w Cast .....ws 79104910. *..,,,.:3379 ... IY 1Ma '/ .4316 Cen8801 78.>er. 7tlra 2.44.212 • • •