Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/12/2003 P&Z PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 8, 2003 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING, Circle -Lex VFW, 7868 Lake Drive, Conditional Use Permit, Jeff Smyser B. PUBLIC HEARING, Eagle Brook Church, 7709 20th Ave. N., Conditional Use Permit, Jeff Smyser C. Joseph Kivel, 6262 Otter Lake Road, Variances, Tanda Gretz D. Ed Vaughan, Pheasant Hills 13th Addition, 1423 Sherman Lake Rd., Final Plat, Jeff Smyser E. Capital Homes, 6750 Black Duck Drive, Variance, Tanda Gretz F. City of Lino Lakes/Hartford Group, Legacy at Woods Edge "The Village ", TIF Plan, Mary Alice Divine G. Frank Feela Inc., Hailey Manor, NE portion of MarDon Acres, Final Plat, Jeff Smyser VI. DICUSSION ITEMS A. Temporary Signs/Banners, Jeff Smyser B. Fabric Accessory Structures, Jeff Smyser VII. ADJOURN • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES on, ea and Raffe Smyser, Tanda C r ane, Schaps, an '1°ra. I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:36 p.m., October 8, 2003. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 10, 2003 Mr. Tralle made a MOTION approve the September 10, 2003 Minutes and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 3 -0 -1 (Ms. Lane abstained). IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared Open Mike open at 6:37 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:37 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING, Gerald Schultz, Lakeview Estates, SE corner of Elm Street • & Lakeview Drive, Preliminary Plat and Variances Chair Schaps opened the public hearing at 6:37 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 2003 Page 2 Staff stated applicant had requested approval of the Lakeview Estates Plat. He noted this projected involved redevelopment of an existing residential lot in the Lexington Park Lakeview neighborhood. He stated the proposed plat would subdivide applicant's existing lot to create two additional house lots. The existing homes would remain on the a lot of its own, with the result being three lots instead of one. Staff was recommending approval subject to the following conditions: 1. All three lots in the plat must connect to City water and sanitary sewer 2. The existing well shall be capped if required by Minnesota Department of Health requirements. 3. To minimize conflicts with existing street intersections, the driveway on Lot 3 shall be as far west as possible. 4. If a shared driveway option is not utilized, a new driveway must be built for Lot 1 that meets the setback requirements. 5. Park dedication of $3,330.00 shall be paid. Chair Schaps invited the public to make comment. There was no one from the public who made comment. Chair Schaps asked if staff had received any objections from the neighbors regarding this proposed plat. Mr. Smyser replied he had not received any comments from the neighbors. Mr. Corson asked staff to look into the setback issue prior to this going to Council. Mr. Tralle asked if the existing garage and shed would be removed and if the driveways would be shared. Mr. Smyser replied they had not resolved the driveway issue at this time, but applicants were agreeable to removing or moving the shed and garage. Mr. Tralle asked if the existing septic system would be removed. Mr. Smyser replied the existing septic system would be abandoned and they would be required to hook up to City water and sewer. He noted the well could still be used for irrigation purposes, but it not be allowed to be hooked up to the house. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 6:52 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to recommend approving Gerald Schultz, Lakeview Estates, SE corner of Elm Street & Lakeview Drive., Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions as noted in staff's October 8, 2003 report and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4 -0. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to recommend approving Gerald Schultz, Lakeview Estates, SE corner of Elm Street and Lakeview Drive Variances subject to the conditions as noted in staff's October 8, 2003 report and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 2003 Page 3 B. Joseph Kivel, 6262 Otter Lake Road, Variances Staff stated applicant was requesting two variances for a detached garage on his property: one, for placement closer to the street than the home and two, for placement closer to the street than the required 40 -foot setback. She noted the property contained an existing older home, but no garage. The garage that used to belong to the home now existed on the property to the north, which was split off from what is now known as the Kivel property back in 1979. Staff recommended denying the variance, as it would effectively increase public costs for future road improvement projects, as Anoka County had stated Otter Lake Road future improvements would require an increase to a 60 -foot right -of -way (ten feet more than the existing 50 feet of right -of -way), and because it placed an accessory structure too close to the road right -of -way, as it offered absolutely no setback from a major collector roadway. Chair Schaps asked if other options had been explored with applicant. Ms. Gretz replied the applicant had explored other areas on his property. Mr. Tralle stated he had looked at the property and there was no other place to put the garage, unless he moved it forward within five feet of the house. Ms. Gretz noted they could move the garage out of Anoka County's needed right -of -way area, but there was still a 40 -foot difference with respect to the City's Zoning Ordinance and it's requirement of a street setback. Ms. Gretz acknowledged that while hardship could be demonstrated with this request, the home was so close to the road that there were not any options for a garage even though the Ordinance required a two -car garage. She noted there was a possibility of other options such as filling, but those options would be expensive and problematic in themselves. Mr. Corson asked if there were any possibility of City sewer and water being extended into this area in the near future, so the septic system would not be needed. Mr. Smyser replied he did not believe it would occur by 2010 and even if this were in a long -term growth area, utilities would not be extended for some time. Mr. Smyser pointed out that the property owner had created this problem because they split the lot and disconnected the garage from the lot where the home was located. He indicated while Anoka County had not committed to widening the road in anytime in the near future, it would eventually be widened and the garage would need to be removed at that time. He noted this was an expensive proposition. Mr. Joe Kivel, applicant, stated when he did his septic system, this was the only place where the engineer would allow it to go. He indicated he did not split the lot; it was split over 20 years ago and he was not the owner of the property 20 years ago. He stated he believed he could site the proposed garage outside of the 60 -foot right -of -way area needed by Anoka County, and he would be willing to obtain a better survey to show that this was possible. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 2003 Page 4 Mr. Tralle asked if applicant would be willing to move the garage up and connect it to the house. Mr. Kivel replied he would be willing to do that if they could work it out with the County where the setback line was. He indicated he could move the garage back to meet the setback of 60 feet. Ms. Gretz reminded the applicant and board members that the 60 feet was not a setback requirement, it was a right -of -way need of the County. She noted if they moved the garage back and attached it to the home, it might solve Anoka County's future right -of- way issue, but it would not solve the City issue regarding the required 40 -foot street setback. She indicated that even if the applicant could move the garage to accommodate Anoka County's future needs, the applicant would still be right on the property line and would not be providing a street setback. Mr. Tralle stated if that applicant attached the garage to the home, then he would not need one of the two variances requested. Ms. Gretz replied that was correct, but that he would still need the second variance for the 40 -foot street setback requirement. Mr. Tralle suggested Mr. Kivel obtain a better survey and come back to the Board. Mr. Hyden noted there was still the issue that this was a large variance and they had to be conscious about setting a precedent. Mr. Tralle stated he believed they needed to look at each individual property and that was the reason for variances. Mr. Kivel pointed out the circumstance he had was very unique and this was the only place he could put the garage on the property. He stated he did not believe other residents would have this type of a unique circumstance. Mr. Hyden pointed out sometimes there was no solution to an issue. Chair Schaps asked if Mr. Kivel would be willing to put in a 12 -foot wide garage, to make a longer garage. Mr. Kivel replied that was a possibility, but that would not solve the 40 -foot setback issue. Chair Schaps stated his concern was that Anoka County would in the future say the garage was in the way and the homeowner would come back to the City. Mr. Kivel stated this was a very unique situation and that was the reason he was asking for a variance. Ms. Lane suggested applicant talk to his neighbor to the north to see if they would be willing to sell a portion of his land, or swap land, in order for Mr. Kivel to build his garage to the north of his home, or provide enough room for a drive to extend along the north of his home so that a garage could be sited to the east of the home. Mr. Smyser stated the issue was that they did not have accurate information from the applicant's survey at this time regarding the setback distances. Chair Schaps asked if they should table this until next month to allow Mr. Kivel time to investigate if he could purchase or swap land from the neighbor to the north and for staff DRAFT MINUTES • • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 2003 Page 5 to obtain further information regarding the setback via the applicant providing a better survey. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to table this item until next month's meeting and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Temporary Signs/Banners Staff stated they were seeking direction from the P &Z Board on how to address the issue of banners and other types of temporary signs. He noted staff would then take those recommendations and prepare an ordinance for a future public meeting. Mr. Hyden stated he wanted signs only attached to the building for one month and not permanently affixed to the building or ground. Mr. Corson agreed. Mr. Tralle stated he did not want to see any banners or temporary signs allowed. Ms. Lane stated she wanted banners /temporary signs only attached to building, for one month with limitations (i.e. she did not want to see a different sign being placed on the same building every month year round). Chair Schaps stated he agreed with Mr. Hyden and Mr. Corson and somewhat with Ms. Lane. Mr. Tralle stated he objected to banners being attached to nice, brick buildings. He indicated he wanted a definite place on a building where signs and banners would be placed and the signs only be placed on a building for a maximum amount of time, such as one month. Mr. Hyden pointed out it was important for a new business to advertise they were open for business and it was not up to the City to say were those signs should be placed. Ms. Lane stated she personally did not have an issue with the "yellow stand alone signs" that were placed within the setback to advertise specials, or the scrolling reading board signs. Ms. Smyser asked if they should restrict the size of the temporary signs and banners. Chair Schaps stated he would like to hear from the people/businesses owners who used and/or wanted these temporary signs/banners and suggested they continue this until next month. Mr. Corson stated they would need to invite the bar owners and gas station owners in • particular. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 2003 Page 6 Mr. Tralle stated he also wanted the banks to be invited. He noted if The Village application came in for November, he would prefer this not be heard next month. B. Fabric Accessory Structures Staff stated a number of residents were constructing temporary fabric structures, primarily for the storage of vehicles. He indicated staff was seeking direction from the Planning and Zoning Board as to adding language to the zoning ordinance to address this type of structure. He noted staff would then take those recommendations and prepare an Ordinance for a future public meeting. Chair Schaps requested this be continued until Board members Rafferty and Lyden were present. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Corson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:52 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 4 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V. A Jeff Smyser November 12, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING: Amendment to Conditional Use Permit For A Private Club Circle -Lex VFW 7868 Lake Drive The Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 is interested in constructing a new building at their site on the northeast comer of Lake Drive and Lois Lane. The site is guided and zoned for this type of use. It is not within the MUSA: in order to connect to city utilities, it must receive MUSA. The site has a conditional use permit (CUP) which will need to be amended to allow the construction of the new building. The required site and building plan review is an administrative review, but the review elements are relevant to the CUP. The City approved a CUP amendment in April 1999 for the construction of an addition onto the existing VFW building. The work proposed by this new application would replace that approved plan. ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning: Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site VFW Commercial, Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area, outside of MUSA General Business North residential Commercial General Business South auto garage, retail Commercial General Business East residential Commercial General Business and Rural West residential (across Lake Drive) Low and Medium Density Sewered Residential R -1 • Circle -Lex VFW page 2 The submittal complies with the GB General Business zoning standards as follows: The site consists of several individual parcels. These should be combined into one tax parcel as a condition of approval. Growth Management and MUSA: The site currently is not within the MUSA. With the adoption of the comprehensive plan, the City has a MUSA reserve. As stated in the comprehensive plan and reiterated in Ordinance 01 -03, the Growth Management Policy, we have a total of 74 acres of commercial /industrial MUSA reserve. This can be allocated anytime prior to year 2010. The VFW project will require 2.24 acres of MUSA reserve. The site is within a Stage 1 growth area, which allows for utility extension prior to year 2010. It is guided for commercial land use. It will not overburden the transportation, sanitary sewer, or water infrastructure and the development is not premature according to the standards listed in City ordinance and incorporated into the growth management policy. SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Building: The building reflects the design elements of the City Hall, Community State Bank, and other buildings along Lake Drive. These include a peaked, green metal roof, masonry walls, and earthtone colors: buff, red, and charcoal. The average height of the pitched roof is 22 ft. This is the technical building height, according to the definition in the zoning ordinance. (The roof peak will be approximately 30 ft. high.) The building footprint is approximately 11,500 sf. The faux chimneys on the building entrance gable ends echo the theme of other buildings in Lino Lakes. However, they are not mandatory. The VFW could do away with this feature and save a little money, if it wants to. Required Proposed 2.24 (when combined) Lot size minimum 20,000 sf Lot width minimum 100' Setbacks: buildings from street 40 43± rear lot line 30 200+ side lot line parking from street 10 15 20 15 rear lot line 10 10 side lot line 10 10 Bldg. height 45 22 Impervious max. 75% 66% The site consists of several individual parcels. These should be combined into one tax parcel as a condition of approval. Growth Management and MUSA: The site currently is not within the MUSA. With the adoption of the comprehensive plan, the City has a MUSA reserve. As stated in the comprehensive plan and reiterated in Ordinance 01 -03, the Growth Management Policy, we have a total of 74 acres of commercial /industrial MUSA reserve. This can be allocated anytime prior to year 2010. The VFW project will require 2.24 acres of MUSA reserve. The site is within a Stage 1 growth area, which allows for utility extension prior to year 2010. It is guided for commercial land use. It will not overburden the transportation, sanitary sewer, or water infrastructure and the development is not premature according to the standards listed in City ordinance and incorporated into the growth management policy. SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Building: The building reflects the design elements of the City Hall, Community State Bank, and other buildings along Lake Drive. These include a peaked, green metal roof, masonry walls, and earthtone colors: buff, red, and charcoal. The average height of the pitched roof is 22 ft. This is the technical building height, according to the definition in the zoning ordinance. (The roof peak will be approximately 30 ft. high.) The building footprint is approximately 11,500 sf. The faux chimneys on the building entrance gable ends echo the theme of other buildings in Lino Lakes. However, they are not mandatory. The VFW could do away with this feature and save a little money, if it wants to. • Circle -Lex VFW page 3 The setbacks from the proposed Lake Drive right of way is 40', and 70' from Lois Lane. The parking setbacks are 15'. Since the Lois Lane side is the shorter fronting on a road, it is considered the front for measuring setbacks. This makes the east the side lot line, where the setback of 20' complies with the requirement. The trash area is shown on the plan east of the building. We have no information on the trash enclosure. This must be supplied. The existing house and garage are not shown on the survey. These must be removed and the septic system and well abandoned. Fire suppression sprinklers will be required. Lighting: Light fixtures in the parking lot will be on four poles. One, in the northern parking area, will have four fixtures. Two will be near the driveways, another in the southwest corner of the lot. The submitted photometric plan indicates that lighting does not meet city standards. It must indicate no more than 0.4 foot candles at the residential property line to the east, and no more than 1.0 at street right of way lines. The building elevations show additional exterior lighting. These must be included in the photometric analysis. We have not received fixture cut sheets. All exterior fixtures must be 90 degree cutoff fixtures. Any lighting under the north and south entry canopies must be completely recessed, as is required for motor fuel station canopies. Signage: No additional ground signs are indicated on the plan. An area of the south wall indicates an area for wall signage. Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. Landscaping, Screening: As shown on the landscape plan, a variety of trees, shrubs and ornamental plantings are proposed on site. There is some discrepancy between the number of trees on the plan and the number listed in the planting list. This must be resolved. The City native seed schedule should be used in infiltration and ponding areas. A fence exists along the east property line. However, this does not provide the required screening. Additional screening must be added to a revised landscaping plan. • Utilities: The VFW site currently is not within the MUSA, but the City has plenty of commercial MUSA reserve to accommodate the needed 2.24 acres needed. Water and Sanitary sewer service are available to serve the site in Lake Drive. • Circle -Lex VFW page 4 The existing VFW building has a well and onsite septic system. Both are in locations that will be completely or partially covered by the new building. If the existing building is to continue operating during construction of the new building, there must be a way to supply water and dispose of wastewater. If this cannot be done, the existing building must close during construction. The survey does not indicate the location of any existing wells or onsite septic system for the house that exists on the northern portion of the site. These must be located and properly abandoned. As a condition of plan approval, utility related modifications and comments as set forth in the City Engineer's memo should to be incorporated into the final plans. Stormwater management: The plan proposes ponding along the northern border of the site as well as within the Lake Drive right of way. Ponding in the right of way is not acceptable. An added complication is that the city water and sanitary sewer pipes run under the proposed pond. These issues must be resolved before the project moves forward. The areas needed for ponding affect what's available for parking, which may limit the building size. These are fundamental aspects of the site design. There are other elements of the drainage design that require additional information, such as a "concrete spillway" noted at the Lois Lane driveway. Drainage and utility easements must be created over all ponds. The applicant will be required to enter into a ponding maintenance agreement with the city. As a condition of plan approval, the grading and drainage related modifications and comments as set forth in the City Engineer's memo should be incorporated into the plans. Access, Circulation, Parking: Right Of Way Lake Drive is CSAH 23, a principal arterial roadway. Ultimately, Anoka County will need 60 feet of right of way on each side of the centerline for Lake Drive, for a total width of 120 feet. There is a discrepancy over the current width of the Lake Drive right of way. The half - section shows the right of way as 100' along the entire frontage of the site. The submitted survey, however, shows a jog in the property /right of way line: the total ROW is 100 feet along the northern part of the property, but only 90' along the southern part. The Anoka County Highway Dept. states, in a letter responding to concept plan discussions, that "an additional 10 feet" of ROW is needed. The VFW is proposing to dedicate additional ROW along the southern portion of the site, to create an even line, 50' from the centerline (total 100' width). If Anoka County needs to take an additional 10' in the future, the proposed new curb and drive lane on the VFW site will still be 5' from the property line/ROW. The site could still function. The building is proposed to be 40+ feet from the proposed new ROW line. If additional ROW is taken, it would be 30 feet from the line. While this is closer than we would allow now, it will not require removal of the parking or building. • Circle -Lex VFW page 5 The stormwater pond proposed by the applicant is in the ROW regardless of where a new line is drawn, as discussed above. This is not acceptable. In addition, the discrepancies regarding the existing and proposed right of way lines must be resolved. Access, Circulation Current access to the site is not well defined. Neither Lake Drive nor Lois Lane have curbs. Access occurs along the property line, not necessarily by defined driveways. In the future, Anoka County is planning to construct a median as part of Lake Drive improvements. This will restrict access to many properties, as it will eliminate left turns in and out of many driveways. The improved site will be accessed from two driveways, one each on Lake Drive and Lois Lane. The parking lots and driveways will be asphalt and must have curbs. The Lake Drive driveway will align with 79`h St. A full access through a future Lake Drive median may have better probability if the driveway aligns with a public road (79th St.), though this is not assured. The Lois Lane driveway is as far back from the Lake Drive intersection as possible while still providing the minimum 10' setback from the side property line. The plan proposes two distinct parking areas. The smaller area on the south side is intended to accommodate the bar and restaurant. The northern area will serve the assembly hall. In the northern area, the drive lane that parallels Lake Drive has the potential to connect with a parking area on property to the north when it develops. This serves as a de facto frontage road. With the likelihood of a median in Lake Drive, access for both sites will be better if they can use one another's driveway. It increases the number of Lake Drive driveways available for each site from one to two, while only building one on each site. Because Lake Drive is an arterial, it will be a good idea to require a stop sign for vehicles existing the parking lot onto Lake Drive. Parking For bars and restaurants, our code requires 10 spaces per 1000 sf, plus one space per employee on the maximum shift. This applies to the southern portion of the new building. The bar area is approx. 1580 sf. The stage and dance floor take up about 2240 sf, for a total of 1340 sf. The larger assembly hall no the north side is a different situation. There is no specific standard for this. The ordinance states that a use is not specifically listed, parking should be determined on an individual basis. Factors to be considered include building size, type of use, number of employees, and expected volume and turnover of traffic. The most comparable standard listed in the ordinance is for "church, theater, auditorium." These require one parking space for each 300 seats. The VFW hall has a maximum of 300 seats. • Circle -Lex VFW page 6 Using the "auditorium" parking requirement, there is a shortage of 32 stalls, or 26% as the plan is drawn. If the drive lane is opened to the north, at least three stalls will be lost, increasing the shortage to 35. With the need to redesign the stormwater ponding, the parking needs reexamination as well. When the number of spaces is decided, the number of handicapped spaces must be revisited as well to ensure the plan meets ADA requirements. Conditional Use Permit There are general criteria for all CUPs and specific conditions that apply to private clubs. General Criteria: The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds the following criteria have been met: a. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: Land Use Plan, Transportation Plan, Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans, Local Water Management Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, Policy Plan, Natural Environment Plan. • The proposed project creates no conflicts with the plans. b. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. • The site has been used for the same use for many years. The increase in size of the building will not create incompatibilities as long as the use complies with the performance standards and conditions. c. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. • The proposal complies with the zoning ordinance requirements. d. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: Zoning Ord. Requirement Spaces Required Spaces Provided bar /restaurant area 1340 sf lO spaces /1000 sf plus 1/ employee 13 + 8 = 21 21 assembly hall area ( "auditorium ") 300 seats 1 space /3 seats 100 68 total 121 89 Using the "auditorium" parking requirement, there is a shortage of 32 stalls, or 26% as the plan is drawn. If the drive lane is opened to the north, at least three stalls will be lost, increasing the shortage to 35. With the need to redesign the stormwater ponding, the parking needs reexamination as well. When the number of spaces is decided, the number of handicapped spaces must be revisited as well to ensure the plan meets ADA requirements. Conditional Use Permit There are general criteria for all CUPs and specific conditions that apply to private clubs. General Criteria: The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds the following criteria have been met: a. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: Land Use Plan, Transportation Plan, Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans, Local Water Management Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, Policy Plan, Natural Environment Plan. • The proposed project creates no conflicts with the plans. b. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. • The site has been used for the same use for many years. The increase in size of the building will not create incompatibilities as long as the use complies with the performance standards and conditions. c. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. • The proposal complies with the zoning ordinance requirements. d. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: • Circle -Lex VFW page 7 1) If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. 2) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. 3) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. 4) The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. 5) Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. 6) The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer- financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. 7) The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- 35W/Lake Drive or I- 35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties, that contribute to traffic at the interchange. 8) The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. • Traffic generated by the new building will increase somewhat over the existing use, but is not expected to create ongoing traffic problems. Large events will bring additional vehicles periodically. However, 100± vehicles will not create a safety hazard or significant impacts. The Apollo Drive and Main St. intersections with Lake Drive both are controlled intersections. If, in the future, traffic becomes an issue, the City can revisit the CUP and consider adding additional conditions such as traffic control personnel for large events. e. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. f. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer system. • The new building will be connected to city water and sanitary sewer. g. The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. • There will be no city capital expenditures for this project. h. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. Circle -Lex VFW page 8 II• The project will create no such undesirable effects. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. • No such features exist on the site. Specific Conditions: Private lodges and clubs are allowed as conditional uses in the GB zone provided that: a. Adequate screening from abutting and adjoining residential uses and landscaping is provided. b. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from adjoining and residential uses. c. Adequate off - street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where applicable by Section 3, Subd. 6. of this Ordinance. • The review has discussed these issues, and they are addressed in the plans and conditions of approval. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on October 29, 2003. The Board's recommendations are attached. They focus on parking and lighting. The parking needs are probably higher than suggested by the applicant, and the parking lot likely will need to be reconfigured. This report explains above that the lighting plan does not meet city standards. RECOMMENDATION As discussed in this report, there are a number of issues that should be addressed prior to approval. Several of these issues are so important, that the rest of the plan depends on them. For example, the ponding must not be in the right of way and the ponding and parking areas are major site design issues. Further reduction of parking may necessitate reduction in the size and capacity of the building. The right of way issue also needs clarification. The fundamental layout of the site must be determined acceptable before the P & Z can recommend approval. Because of this, staff recommends tabling the project. This will allow the applicant to redesign the ponds and parking as well as reexamine the other issues. The list below includes the issues that need to be addressed before P & Z approval (the first five) as well as conditions that should be attached to the eventual approval (6 — 20).. 1. Ponds shall not be in the road rights of way. 2. The right of way discrepancy must be resolved. 3. Parking needs must be met. • • Circle -Lex VFW page 9 4. The VFW must submit a plan for servicing the existing building with utilities during construction or the existing building must be closed until the new building is functional. 5. A new photometric plan must be submitted that includes exterior building lighting as well as parking lot lighting. The plan must indicate no more than 0.4 foot candles at the residential property line to the east, and no more than 1.0 at street right of way lines. Legible cut sheets for all exterior fixtures must be submitted. All exterior fixtures must be 90 degree cutoff fixtures. 6. The separate parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel. The applicant must submit documentation that a lot combination has been filed with Anoka County prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County for Lake Drive, as indicated on the plans. A deed for this right of way shall be filed prior to building permit issuance. 8. All necessary permits shall be obtained by the applicant from Anoka County for work in the Lake Drive (CSAH 23) right of way. 9. The parking lots and driveways must have curbs. 10. Any lighting under the north and south entry canopies must be completely recessed. 11. Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. 12. A new landscaping plan must be submitted that without discrepancies between the number of trees on the plan and the number listed in the planting list. In addition, the City's native seed schedule should be used in infiltration and ponding areas. 13. Additional screening along the east property line shall be added on the revised landscaping plan. 14. Drainage and utility easements must be created over all ponds. 15. The new building must connect to city water and sanitary sewer and pay appropriate connection charges. 16. Issues listed in the November 5th memo by the City Engineer must be resolved to his satisfaction. 17. The existing house and garage are not shown on the survey. These must be removed and the septic system and well located and properly abandoned. 18. Elevations for the trash enclosure shall be submitted prior to city council consideration of the application. 19. A stop sign shall be installed for vehicles exiting the Lake Drive driveway. The sign shall not be in the right of way. 20. The VFW shall enter into a site performance agreement prior to issuance of a building permit. This review is based on the following plan submittals, received October 10, 2003: 1. Boundary and Topographic Survey, E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., 9/05/03 2. Code Data, DSGW, July 7, 2003 3. Site Plan, DSGW, July 7, 2003 4. Floor Plan, DSGW, July 7, 2003 5. Exterior Elevations, DSGW, July 7, 2003 Circle -Lex VFW page 10 6. Building Section, DSGW, July 7, 2003 7. Utility Plan, Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, 8/28/03 8. Grading Plan, Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, 8/28/03 9. Landscape Plan, DSGW, July 7, 2003 10. Landscape Details, DSGW, July 7, 2003 11. Site Photometrics, Weber Electric, 9/30/03 12. Supplementary "Site Summary ", indicating impervious coverage, Nov. 3, 2003 • • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jatfray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583 Copies To: Comm. No. From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Routing: Date: November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 12701 -002 The City of Lino Lakes has received plans providing for reconstruction of the existing VFW facility site at the intersection of Lois Lane and Lake Drive. The following document copies have been provided for review: 1. Land Use Application dated October 13, 2003. 2. Full size and 11X17-size Preliminary Plan sets (12 sheets) dated October 9, 2003. • 3. Letter to the City of Lino Lakes from Anoka County dated September 22, 2003. 4. Drainage Calculations from Metro Land Surveying dated October 14, 2003, along with a letter from Metro dated October 8, 2003. A new VFW facility is proposed at its existing location at the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Lois Lane. The proposed plan provides for demolition of the existing building and construction of a new building with improved driveways and parking facilities. The area of the site is approximately 2.25 acres, and will therefore be subject to the requirements of NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) as most recently adopted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the City of Lino Lakes. Because the site is less than 2.5 acres, it is our understanding that a review and approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) will not be required. The following review comments are offered at this time: Anoka County Because the property is adjacent to Lake Drive (County Road 23), the plan will require the review and approval of Anoka County. The County has provided review comments in a letter to the City dated September 22, 2003. A summary of the County's comments is as follows: An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 Page 2 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 1. The dedication of an additional 10 -feet of right of way will be required for future reconstruction purposes. At this time, it is not proposed to construct a right turn lane into the property. However, increases in future traffic volumes and safety concerns may warrant such a requirement from the County in the future, and will be the responsibility of the property owner to construct if required by the County. 2. Currently there are three driveways to CSAH 23 from the property. A single access to CSAH 23 opposite 79th Street is proposed, and is acceptable to the County. The applicant shall be aware, that pending any future improvements to CSAH 23, a raised median or limiting of full access to the driveway may eventually become a possibility. 3. Sight corner visibilities shall be maintained per City and County requirements. No plantings, berms, business signs, or other features may be installed within the right of way, and that any such features installed outside of the right of way must not compromise safe visibility. The site landscape plan shall consider this issue accordingly. 4. At the time of the County's review (September 22, 2003), a grading and erosion control plan had not yet been submitted. The County will require a grading and erosion control plan for review along with drainage calculations. 5. A permit from Anoka County will be required for any and all work within the County right of way. Provisions for restoration, traffic control, and safety as required by the County shall be incorporated into the plans. Site Plan The following comments regarding the site plan are offered as follows: 1. As previously stated, the three existing access points into the property from CSAH 23 have been combined into a single access point, which improves overall traffic safety with regards to the County Roadway and is viewed favorably by Anoka County. However, the access point must line up directly with 79th Street on the opposite side of the roadway. 2. Proposed improvement features should be labeled accordingly, including concrete curb and gutter, detention areas, and construction notes as applicable. Construction related items such as standard construction details can be provided on a separate detail sheet. This would include pavement thicknesses, and references to MnDot, County, and City standard plates details as required. 3. The building's main floor and lowest floor elevations must be provided. The lowest building opening must be a minimum of 1 -foot higher than the emergency overflow elevation. Basement floor elevations must be at least 4 -feet above the normal water elevation and 2 -feet above the design flood level. • • • Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 Page 3 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 4. It is recommended that an additional 10 -feet of right of way along Lois Lane be dedicated. Lois Lane will likely be subject to future improvements that would include the installation of concrete curb and gutter. Set -back distance requirements for the parking area and building from the newly dedicated right of way limits shall be further verified. 5. A north arrow and bar scale must be provided on the plan. Grading Plan The grading plan provides a general overall plan of how the site is proposed to be graded. However, the plans will ultimately require further detail for construction purposes and will eventually require the following: 1. Standard details for specific design items such as erosion and sedimentation control measures, outlet and manhole details, seeding and turf restoration, importing of material as may be needed, and provisions for private utilities (Gopher State One - Call), must be included. Standard details per City of Lino Lakes standards may be provided on a separate detail sheet. 2. The site grading plan provides for a system of collection and detention areas prior to discharging into an existing storm sewer that runs parallel to Lake Drive and under the east edge of the pavement. The size and ownership of the pipe (City or County) should be verified. 3. Drainage calculations have been submitted and are currently being reviewed. 4. The site and grading plans propose the construction of detention basins within the CSAH 23 right of way, which is unacceptable. The right of way (and additional 10 feet of dedication required by the County) must be reserved for future roadway improvements, trails, and provide space for the installation of utilities (public and private as needed). The overall site drainage design plan must be re- reviewed. Other portions of the property must be utilized for detention, and/or other methods explored such as infiltration basins that may be feasible. This may also affect the landscape plan design as proposed. 5. Erosion Control measures (silt fencing) are shown on the plan accordingly. 6. Any imported topsoil, fill material, or granular materials to be used as roadway or building pad fill must be approved by the City Engineer (material and source). 7. Any notes regarding clearing of trees should be revised to include language stating that clearing and grubbing shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes and Mn/DOT 2101. 8. Notes regarding seeding, mulching and turf establishment should refer to the appropriate Mn/DOT • Specification for turf establishment (2575) and for the seed mixture. The City of Lino Lakes has a Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 Page 4 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota specific seed specification for ponding areas that the Church shall incorporate into the plans. fl- inches of topsoil on all boulevards shall be provided and seed or sod as approved by the City. 9. All grading shall be confined to the property. No additional runoff from the site shall enter upon neighboring properties. If grading requires any work into adjoining property, the Contractor shall be responsible for attaining authorization as needed. An existing retaining wall is located at the east property line. It is assumed that this retaining wall will be left in place and left undisturbed. If not, the grading plan must provide grading provisions as needed. 10. The grading plan suggests that at least some portions of the parking lot and driveways will drain directly to the neighboring streets (Lake Drive and Lois Lane). Additional spot elevations at the driveway entrances should be shown to verify the intended drainage patterns. Utility Plan The Utility Plan submitted at this time provides a general overall design for the utility system (water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). Much of the detailed information required for construction plans has not yet been provided (i.e., standard construction details, references to specifications, City requirements, etc.). However, the following general comments can be made regarding the Utility Plan at this time: 1. Sanitary sewer and water currently exist in Lake Drive (12 -inch diameter water and 21 -inch diameter sanitary sewer). The plans propose utilizing existing services to these mains. The size and condition of these services should be verified to assure their adequacy. 2. As previously stated, an existing storm sewer runs parallel to Lake Drive and under the east edge of the pavement. The utility and grading plans propose connecting to this storm sewer. The size and ownership of the pipe (City or County), and capacity to receive the drainage must be further verified. The connecting work will occur within the right of way and require a permit from Anoka County. 3. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet. 4. Water pipe and appurtenances shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino lakes, and as follows: Hydrants - Waterous Pacer WB -67; Valves - Mueller A2370 -20 or equal. DIP pipe shall be Class 52. City standards must be identified on the plan or provided on a detail sheet. 5. All storm sewer pipes must be RC pipe. Pipe sizes, grades, and structure invert and rim elevations must be provided. A minimum of 2 feet of cover over storm sewer pipe is desired. 6. References to private utilities, including gopher State One Call must also be provided. • Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 Page 5 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Other 1. A geotechnical report has not been provided. 2. Development of the site will require demolition of the existing building and removal of smaller buildings and surface features. There may also be underground items required for removal as well, including foundations, storage tanks, old septic systems, etc. The applicant shall verify the existence of all surface and underground items and remove and dispose as required in accordance with State and local regulations. 3. Additional design and construction information must be provided on the Photometric Plan (Sheet EP). • • Memo To: Michael Grochalla C 1 T Y O F IN KE CC: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: November 4, 2003 Re: Recommendations of the October 29, 2003 Environmental Board Topic: Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583, 7868 Lake Drive, Site Plan Review Recommendations: The Environmental Board made the following recommendations of the VFW proposal at their October 29, 2003 meeting: • Parking should be reduced to the city minimum, or the VFW should use pervious paving. • Soil - compaction protection measures should be used during construction. • Staff should confirm that the lighting plan conforms to city ordinance. • Use City seed specifications for native plant areas. • Remove existing lighted sign. • Plant Northern pin oaks instead of Summit ash • Agree to clean exhaust vents in a non - polluting manner. • Develop a maintenance plan for native plant areas and frequent parking lot sweeping. Motion: Motion by Donlin, 2nd by Grundhoffer to recommend approval with the Environmental Board recommendations. All were in favor. Motion passed. 1-lls 1 COUNTY September 22, 2003 Jeff Smyser City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 i COUNTY OF ANOKA Public Services Division HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1440 BUNKER LAKE BLVD. N.W., ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304 (763) 862 -4200 FAX (763) 862 -4201 RE: Site Plan Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583 Dear Jeff, We have reviewed the site plan for the Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583, located in NE quadrant of CSAH 23 • (Lake Dr.) and Lois Lane within the City of Lino Lakes, and I offer the following comments: An additional 10 feet of right -of -way adjacent to CSAH 23 will be required for future reconstruction purposes. When CSAH 23 is reconstructed at some time in the future (please note that there are no current plans or available funds for this reconstruction), it is likely that additional easements in the form of temporary, construction, drainage, trail or utility easements will be required, which may or may not have an effect on City setbacks for this property. • As an interim measure, access for this site is acceptable as shown, with a single access onto CSAH 23 directly opposite 79th Street. Please note that whenever this section of CSAH 23 is reconstructed in the future, it will become a multilane divided highway with raised median channelization. While it is not possible to determine exact future full access locations, it should be noted that access for this site may become right turn in /right turn out with future roadway reconstruction. For any future scenario, access management along CSAH 23 will be a key factor in providing safety and mobility for all road users. Consequently, the City of Lino Lakes should work with all property owners along CSAH 23 to develop some type of frontage, backage, or combination frontage /backage road system by which access for each property can be made onto. We would be happy to meet with City Staff to discuss development of an access management plan for CSAH 23 as a part of this or any other development. It appears there are deficiencies for the sight corners at the CSAH 23 access location. The City and /or the Developer shall ensure that all applicable Intersection Sight Distance requirements are met to the fullest extent possible for this development. Please note that no planting or business signs will be permitted within the county right -of -way. Care must be exercised when locating signs /plantings /berms /etc. outside of the county right -of -way, so as not to create sight obstructions for vehicles entering or exiting this site. The right of access along CSAH 23 shall be dedicated to Anoka County, with an exception for the access location. Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer • • It is not clear if the proposed addition to this development will have a significant impact on traffic volumes and /or turning movements on CSAH 23 at 79th Street. As noted above, Anoka County has no plans or allocated funding at this time to reconstruct or provide safety improvements on this section of CSAH 23. If the City of Lino Lakes is concerned about safety or operational issues on CSAH 23 in conjunction with this development, turn lane construction on CSAH 23 shall be completed as a part of the development. If roadway improvements will be required for this development, we recommend that they consist of NB and SB CSAH 23 left and right turn lane construction. Design details, pavement sections and turn lane configurations shall be reviewed and approved by this department as a part of the permit process. Calculations must be provided along with a grading and erosion control plan that delineates the drainage areas for this site. The post - development rate /volume of runoff must not exceed the pre - developed rate /volume of runoff for the 10 -year, 24 -hour storm, utilizing the "SCS Method" of design. A permit for t County _iV -of wa;� is required and must be Mine the ,or work within the ._ o .., _hr _s d :r: ,._ obtained prior to t:.e commencement of any construction. License Permit Bonding, methods of construction, design details, turn lane construction, work zone traffic control, restoration requirements and follow -up inspections are typical elements of the permitting process. Please contact Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator, or Josie Scott, Permit Technician, for further information regarding the permit process. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Jane Pemble Traffic Engineering Manager xc: 2003 /CSAH 23 /PLATS Mike Kelly, Chief Right Of Way Agent Larry Hoium, County Surveyor Roger Butler, Traffic Engineering Coordinator Josie Scott, Permit Technician Tom Hornsby, Traffic Services - Signs • ELEMENTARY SCHOOL L r { 2 L 3 4 4 1< 36 5 E 6 2$L JAMES"- 2 = 7 7 8 8 9 9 1( 35 34 • • PROPOSED LAND USE LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Low Density Sewered Residential Low Density Unsewered Residential CIRCLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 oC r 1 © 2003 Ci 'y LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA I, ABBREVIATIONS A C E N L ma ? _EA,' l ASV. Aran CAB Car. EA. E.0 KC. MInc. Fa LTL LLB. PNT. Pang MO Roan ILK Ur II.M AF.F. Maw or.Iner PUa Cm. Comm ELEC. Et.g.a(elI NR N.n.rr LVR Los PNL Pang R.0. Rouyn Oprtip U.N.¢ .4004 Ngetldfsrww ACA Acw Pea CRS Carom E.W.C. Ete .W.Cm HIRO. Hsdea.r LOT. la Pdr P.T.C. PeasTass CAM. RLlO R,abr URN. llrir A.P. Amuse Peel C.B. Cad,. 41 E9404* Cads HOW. NsWSe P.TA PywTa -I Reaysb AFT. ALT.. TY C.C.A. ... nGUrp EL Elm.. Hw0. Pia* O AOL AN.. ...on EN. EI•a.r HOR Hetlw M PM PBola 9 A0.4 AN.. FCD. CaMCen Change EN¢ EpoxyP NVAC AkCadb,rs.D' MFR N. Ngs PM P.O. ~ B.N.C. 8neay MOOT.. VAR vwls A/C A.G. • CYAN D.P. Epoxy PW A.CarraysM MFR In.er . NILT. Pones 9.NO. S.aw Nea.Daoaa V8 Vaw Brew AF At Carlaw9 CI¢ CeYD E0. Enaa 4. Held. .. Mon Bas. NR PM. S.N.R. sans, Nap.n Racepb VNR Veneer ALT. M.M,. GNT. Caro Mayl EQUIP. EaNmwn 00.5. Hdbw Can MAS Many PLAB PM. SOH. s.ao. VENT. Verna ALUM. Almnvm FL Ca.. ESC. E.olar HAL Nal.... MA se, 0,... P.WL FN..... 9111 Swim VER VOW ANC. Aro. GER. CoWC E.LST. E*0.5 NOR Ao*.,l M.L. M. LIO PL P. 9Hr¢ 91wesiq VERT. V.. AB An... C.T. Cwemle TM EB E+psalm Boll NM. Hy.. MAT TAM. PU¢ Nunn. SM. 9nea VEST. .4041 CIRC. Mconero EIT. Dews. Jan MAX Manmm IWO. M.o. win. Slw.v WR VOn ANDO. Nod. Fd C.. Cr. EXT. E.Iwb I MECH. IA... PT. Pair StN. Sean V.B VI. B. ARROX AlpornmN COL Chinn.) N.G Mct.. Co.. P.C. Pnmt Cow. 9A. So. dowser V.C.T. VYyl CanparmTM ARC1L ArtNYalafl CCO. F IR Inc. o NA. ...en P.RV. Pant Rol Venn. SC Sone Can V.F. VInl WAI ASL Ar..... SMMwnw,al CO OL Crum INCL Include MET. Mss P.R. Po. SA.L 9o. A0erualNn.serw, V.W.C. VeP WYI COnwIM .... COMB Cantina. PRO/ P. P... SPEC. SIwaO.Im F.D. Fu aln LJT. 1.1.a,Jgr NEZL MO.. P.R. Pro.. ReLelwa AUTO. A�4ea CO. Cona,-4a. F.D. Fee Ores NLm1L N4(tiv. MK MBwal SO. SMW On FYenmlro W AUTO. Aganse CONC. Cana. N. Fe. YR. MN. MIN MWmun Pl.- Pwprry Up 90. SM. FWI. CoATeb l.asrY L1MF.F. F.nEFra NB Mbm SS SYbaNSW W08T Minna B CONT. Conmaw PE F. Enna... J NBC. 1p S. O STL SMN W.4 Ws .sts CONTR. Casbusee F.E.4 Fin P,O.4 Cneal N.S 140, STOR Sleep W.R. P. Ws Rol Ban Bstepl.n 0.01 f0mm Fin Wool JAN JoNpr MULL. AVtlim 0.1. 09015 SUSI, ST.. WP. Wo,aaol BRIT. Bass PI C.LL CairdAM Una F.P. FN Rrn JNT. JW O.T. C.rty TN 0. C. Sup.Netl 0. Wwnnas.lppro CIT. Casa Jar SAGT. 9upwaq Aaouyol CeLID W.W.F.W. ........ EL P. Bass Plse FA F6M J.B Jgr BS:.em N BR¢ Baaro E.¢ Coma Bwtl FatT. Fbapr,m J9T- JNn fl TY. F. Wide Flap BPL Same Male COM Cana. FLA Fbi....o Rog No. N0AW B.V. B1ss VIM WIN WHden BN Bean MR U.. F.M.R Fo.f. NA ..Monaca RAE. Reg. SYS Sys. WI Wm BLW. Bsoe MO CVrb A¢wr FT. F.., k N Nam RWL Renmsw Los. W0. W090 BTWN Bsw.w, FM. 91.0. Im /(1.n N.LG Nalln Carted REC. Reaen(ae W.PT. Wa.i Ptlr1 BT. B. os D FRO. Tenn N.T.S. Nd To See REF. 00(9010 T ro 811 BM FR Fran AY h.an Nmak Dam N0. Nov. 009 R.II.tl Itron OA BUM. Blacking 000 DtlhC FAL F.M1q 4EFR 0*04*0. TEL 1.004, s X BD. DEMQ Dw11d FURR 0 REF. Rarao(tl1 TEA Temaend BIT: Bonn. Llg. OET. Orr R.C. Rararan Cann. TER TN..., X OW.. Cy BS 001010 DMB Dn.. O OFF. oo c ROM Rev. Flan MS TEL Talus (Ia3.V SOT. BOtlmn DNM. Own. lBL Lana 0.1.0.1 On Cw,V REGO. R.au. TS Tr Balm y B.V. BM Vents DIFF. °Mow US LA.., qV. gwroalWe) TwL TIr(rIm) 8106 BMMIN D.W. Dbnwmner (M. ¢e. UM. lamlrsa D.F.C.L Orals FUnMaCO,w.pa Y DAM. aYV.,.vO Ir.. RES Ratl . TN. Mow. Y. BA B.MIro Mastic DIM. UHOWn S.C. snerel Con.. LAO. Lpwsay O.f.OA O,ms For.... R.F. gauar fbaeq T.P. TgN Pm. BU.R .11 Up R.r. DR Om LT. L.* REV. Revs. T80 Tan. A Oro. B.MIA nnyanea Moony tsty DBL On. .NIT. G.000 M.so, lea U. Lees OP¢ 009.(7 00. Rmldem T.O. Tapd BD. By Co. DR Don L.L.V. LwgLro v.Wrr Op.rro DA DoenOOd O.B. op Bw LLx Lalotro Hmmrs F. OPP.. DW¢ Dra.p GYP OY.Nn OA On. 0.9. OMNI ¢S . gpsn Bow. dt anti E.F. DOW. POW. O.F. Olnee Fee MATERIALS LEGEND SYMBOLS OROOM O GRID LINES �Ma waW ENTRY' ^\ OENTIFN:ATION x DASHED UNE O0 TT.* 1:11111=1j FARTN /EdIPALTF.l 1\\/ PWI9N WOf.Y1 •.., :•'•i��: POROUS FILL / GRAVR 1.>. 1 ROUGH WOOD L / ` �, BECTICN aspennr. aww Pwra Q, ® nom ID@mFcaTIaN NOH HU,b fJ -- /e. V"� PARTITION M WY ND.. Pont N.W Wi WIND /MORTAR /DUSTER \ WOOD BLOOMS .' .. VW E��•/ / / /� / / /� //� MCEBRKM PLYWOOD �1 ELEVATIONS Sees Parwan MATCH UNE eNr.ewcwra,r ..,T'''�IpIIIIIT-\_ DOOR /NICER Da Sara Dos Na. Bar ice_ S • •a �I CONCRETE GYPSUM BOARD P�� WMCONCRETE MASONRY UNIT pr STUD WALL METAL) ��- DECAL analpara EL 10..0. ELeVATNIM 8y1 ®OL EI.0S0MMar -x WNDOM TYPE NW. lNnaa "" GLAZED MASONRY DWI. :t if BATT /LOOSE FILL N .4.41ON VF A� '\ NUMBERING E 'nwINW A. SOLD LINE »w 1111111111111111111111 R''''''''''°" 1- � SPRAY I FOAM INSULATION /'j STEE.I OTHER METALS BRWNOUS SHEET INDEX: ARCHITECTURAL A0.1 COVER SHEET BOUNDRY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (NO SHEET NUMBER) A0.2 CODE DATA A1.1 SITE PLAN A2.1 FLOOR PLAN A5.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS A6.1 BUILDING SECTION AND STAIR SECTIONS CIVIL U1 UTILITY PLAN 01 GRADING PLAN LANDSCAPE L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1_2.0 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ELECTRICAL EP SITE PHOTOMETRICS DESIGN TEAM: OWNER: Circle -Lex VFW Port 46583 7868 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 xxxx CONTRACTOR: Kraus Anderson Construction Company 8625 Rendova Street N.E. P.O. Box 158 Lino Lakes, Minnesota55014 Contact: Brea Baldly (763)786 -7711 (phone) (763)786.2650 ARCHITECT: DSGW ARCHITECTS INC. 548 Apollo Drive, Suite 10 IJno Lakes, Minnesota 55014 (651) 784 -7924 (Phone) (651) 784-7925 (tax) mthomas @dsgw.com (e-mail) Contact: Michael J. Thomas CIVIL Metro Land Surveying 8 Engineering 412 East County Road D Labe Canada, MN 55117 (651)788 -0112 (phone) (651)766-0612 (fax) Contact: Brian Bourassa MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL: Design Build enriching communities through architecture dulneh • oirginia • grand rapids • twin cities wuw.dagw. m CIRCLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 7868 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN p j.a It 03098 de. July 07. 2003 file name drawn by NLR checked by MIT name MICHAEL J. THOMAS mg. It 23592 sign date XXXXX )0(, 2003 signature 1 hereby certify that thin plan. specification, or report VMS prepared by ne or under toy direct supervision and that 1 m a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. mark reobio00e.us sheet title sheet number date 511E B BU110911 PUN REWE010/09/01 COVER SHEET A0.1 1 = ..;armx . en u t O F I i t i OCT102003 BOUNDARY AND TOPORR-4 C SURVEY N ✓�ry� Circle —Lex VFW Post 6583 7868 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 EXISTING PROPERTY All of Lot 8 and that port of Lot Z AUDITOR'S SUBDIWSION Na 100, according to the mop or plot thereof on foie and of record /n the office of the County Recorder In and for Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of the following described the: Beginning of o point on the easterly tine of and 20 fret northerly from the southeast comer of said Lot 7,• thence northwesterly to o paint on the westerly line of sold Lot 7, sold point being 150 feet northeasterly from the southwesterly comer of said Lot 7 (as measured along sold westerly line) and there terminating, EXCEPTING therefrom any part tying within the Plot of Anoka County Highway Plot No. 17. And That port of Lot 9, Auditors Subdivision Na 104 Anoka County Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point an the Southerly line of sold lot a distance of 234 feet Westerly of the Southeast comer thereof, thence Northerly a' a line. (if protected wou /d Intersect the Northerly line of sold lot at o point 200 feet Westerly of the Northeast corner thereof), for o distance of 101.6 feet to point of beginning; thence continuing Northerly on last described line 134.3 feet more or /esa to the Northerly line of said lot thence Westerly on the Northerly line of sold Lot 151.28 feet more or less, to the Northwest corner thereof, thence Southwesterly on the Westerly line thereof, also being the Easterly right —of -way /he of State Trunk Highway No 8 for a distance of 100 feet thence Southeasterly 78,167 feet, mare or leso to point of beginning. Mal Mat part of Lot 9. Auditor's Subdivision Na 104 Anoka County, Minnesota lying Westerly and Southerly of the following described fine: Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of sold Lot 9 o distance of 234 feet Westerly of the Southeast comer thereof thence Northerly on line (if projected would intersect the Northerly fine of sold lot at a point 200 fret Westerly of the Northeast comer thereof) for o distance of 101.6 feet thence Northwesterly to o point on the Westerly /he of sold lot o distance of 100 feet, (as measured on sold Westerly fine) Southwesterly of the Northwest comer thereof, and there term/noting Together with that port of vacated Lois And Together with that port of vacated Lois Lane, also being described as that port of the north 8 feet of Lot 10, Auditors Subdivision No. 100, Anoka County; Minnesota accruing thererto by reason of the vocation thereof (Document No. 510488) And Also the Westerly 10 feet of the Northerly 134.31 feet of that part of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 110, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as fotlowx Beginning at o point on the Southerly the of sold Lot 9 o distance of 120 feet Westerly of the Southeast comer of said lot; thence Westerly 0,1 sold Southerly line a distonae of 114 feet thence Northerly to a point on the Northerly fine of said lot a distance of 200 feet Westerly of the Northeast comer thereof thence Easterly an sold Northerly /he a distance of 90 feet thence Southerly to point of beginning. NORTH Prepared Sy: E. G. RU1, 4 °SONS, INC. Land surveyors C . s AVE N. 9I m ExIINGT&N UE N Tel. 186 -5556 Fax 186 -60011 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dote: y -of &v License No P6b8 REVISIONS: 09 -05 -03 Add parking revisions & new utilities GRAPHIC SCALE ia b p t00 env I 1 inch re 30 ft. / ■ x00.2 .} -- wly Ib7e lot 7 or --SW Ca. lot 7 000 '4. 0i. a♦ x /,/ �0 den x • x04.n x..4.7 —4.e* X04.7 an A p4 ■ Denotes concrete Dada for hceaahoa Denote* *clothe hydrant Denotes ad.bhg gob wive Denote. existing telephone box Denotes *Meting .onitory mow Denote* exalting den Denotes .d.thg catch bade x00.7 58.7a / / 1797.37 C r40r 1 .0e*. K s.izd* _ 0 a p b .7 . .ter ..7a. ;q1 1j11 T pied, MUM x..704. L 0 T 8 sw x.esN Note: Existing Old House at Garage on Lot 8 Not Located or shown (as Requisted by Client) nue 1s / / 0 / / / 000..1 x0004 N'ly IM of Lot 9 --, 200.00 s's . SE C. Lot 7—'1- t:/) xtir io 9 a. X104.70 « •04Y •e 1se97 ESN 7aS Q� cO •d' 90.00 N89'05'08" 9 234.00 F4 Wad '11. .a01.a1 5.. Mal'0 -7- 114.00 189.89 x0007 04101 7' 120.00 447 x70404 --- S tine of Lot 9 pour, Max. %N- -NE Ca. lot 9 �•� --SE Ce. Lot 9 x70033 98736 i5. . rra_+•, 11•0 - 0010 Co00•1,0 Code Bernd Nana¢w Nos. x.. _ , moo.e. B yc w aw s+ea. — L..vrwr..•.0 — Coat, 1818 sa. ua..m dsgw n. * ,....7.n...lw. a— a..la...c....+. M. aaaw..h.l•t. u. w...m wu W1.....emN A3 A.sa tartar v? y „. .' i+•"YS. ..a�?'`__ • .•m1 it S.'ao' rem 77 I •m 1 W I w I•I I w ... wwwic.+.e..y.. 4441107104.•.rl 11—, I as Irma... Il.I....rt Mewl - +mrz.- ' -I 04...In..•1 IIOTAL BUILDING 1 ....I•..M.•.rl a- a 1 as 1... ow., I I • I ••• .141-- I I,aml...I.....a I i 8wa.we :!'SPA . ..ee,a Ime . ... ,.ae.....• Imaa Wan hCI& YmW T. tmruarat•sefeatilagaa®aa -::� �..e u I . nfl • 7 IBIZNo -- MME31=11=IN eT..I 11■10r1•+-.-. wauy awA..yr li W arm Nu m618r oF ..........:.. fhro•e• Lowary • 7777 cn=ton .r.k a2lra. _. r awday awry+, r 1:911111 ▪ EX121°_.=1=1 II 1 awns* ... 1 ew7....a MP* Von emaa. t7•u..aex..w nu r1.•.*1im w-.Y. I' I i1U0J1J11_o�• ,s, I.MI=.lii 11 MMIN■IM •MOI■ININOP I 1f•? .ilia' _ � r` �fif��i��l�*i�i ��llM__._.1 t.Jl It llt 111 llt•1!II•riiiiii: Pr IMMI �P— ■M• Ell :t. ■ —t.l it_t. :mot_ :�>i;t_�i�t_ -1 �' ta_t.#rw— imi IN �I1a_.i.IMIII. 01 MI I .'i' !tat•: M I�t_�.I i. MS. TOTAL GROSS SF = 11,525 TOTAL NET (AGGREGATE) SF = 10,954 OCT 1 0 2003 I CITY OF L.A.KES enriching communities through architecture duluth • oirginia • grand rapids • Nen cities m(1m.agu.ao. CIRCLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 7868 LAKE DRNE LINO LAKES, MN project N 03098 dote 1uty07,2003 file noes drawn by NLR checked by MJT 1141., MICHAEL J. THOMAS reg. e 23592 sign date XXXXX XX, 2003 eignatwre I hereby certify char rho pion, specification, or report .ass prepared by me or under my direct oupervition and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the lawn of the State of Minnesota. mark reowonAmos data 5111 & Bunolxa NAN R.vnw l0 /09/03 CODE DATA A0.2 FUTURE ACCESS TO NORTHERN UMBERING PROPERTT �---- 81, fine LEN 7 t11 0 0'. - 0, Ot&C3 0 N00'54'6 E NW Car. LEN / / / / / / / / / / / / r7 z Nt- 1r / a 15'5E7 BACK IGR NT OiWAT LOIS LANE 4 SITE PLAN TRASH ENCLOSURE 61 45. 189.89 SITE SUMMARY ZONED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LET SRE. 91,73,5 S OR L23 ACRES IMPERVIOUS soma- 61,5685E (64.13) PERVIOUS SURFAQ- 33,,187 SF DIM REQUIRED PARKING BAR 70/1,000 Si + 1 /STAFF • 1,350/1,000.20 +B STAf • 16 DANCE HAIL 20 + 1 /100 OM 3,000 SP 000 ESN 2,500 / 200 .115 20+13.33 OFFICE AREA3 +1/200 960/200.1JTHEREFORE8 TOTAL WORM= 2e +33 +8.89 PROVIDED PARKING REGUA AR STALLS • ES HDCPSTMLS.4 TOTAL89 NE Car. Lot B RE OCT 1 0 2003 CI TY OF LINO LAKES enriching communities through architecture du/nth • oirginia • grand rapid. • non; cities meud.gia.rom CIRCLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 7868 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN project It 03098 dare July 07, 2003 pEa name drawn by NLR checked by MJT name MICHAELJ.THOMAS rag. N 23592 sign date X)0(XX XX, 2003 signature hereby certify that thb plan, specification, or report was proper-ad by me or under my direct superci Ion and that 7 m a duly Lkawed Architect under the lama of the State of Minnesota. mark reobionAsmN sheet title shad number date Sr rL & BUILDING PLAN REVIEW 10/09/03 SITE PLAN A1.1 12'-0• TR HALL ENTRANCE S A 24 12'-0• 105'9• STAFF BREAK ROOM KITCHEN 000 KITCHEN STORAGE 000 000 KITCHEN OFFICE VESTIBULE 000 MISO CAP. ROOMS 00(1) 300 CAP. ROOM ASSEMBLY HALL 1000I BINGO BOOTH 000 TABLE STORAGE M3MANDER & QURTR MSTR OFFICE J loon I 000 WOMEN coo STORAGE 000 PULL TABS 10001 PULL TAB STORAGE 000 \(same r.6• DANCE FLOOR FACILITY MANAGER OFFICE 10001 G ING MANAGER OFFICE [oaol STAGE (FLOOR PLAN 1 /B• = L' -0' EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY - 1rwYDTN CMU(SEE ELVA FOR PAIIERNS).2 LAYERS OF 11/r RIGID INSUL W/ MTL T FURRING 024 0.0 (ONE LAYERHOR.,TIE OTHER VERT.), MID 5/11. GYP BD. 1 BAR 850IMNCE NOTES 1. SUSP END ACCOUST. EEG 0 YerTHR0U6HDU1 UNLESS ROTES OTHERWISE 2. PROVIDE Q.T. F000RIM6 AIRE5TRC S,ERCHEIy EAR, AND KED KOO PROVIDE VET EVERYWHERE FSL 3.1NT WALLS TO BE 5/r SUMO W/ 5 /B" GYP BD EA SIDE. oeT1 0 2003 C6 S if 0 ;2 LNG enriching communities through architecture duluth • oirginia • grand meide • twin cities www.d gw.mm CIRCLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 7868 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN p,rfet data file name drawn by checked by reg. R .ign date signature 03098 July 07, 2003 NLR MIT MICHAEL J. THOMAS 23592 XXXXX XX, 2003 1 hereby certify that this plan, epeclfication, or report was prepared by we or under my direct supervision and that I duty Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. mark revision/lame date S,o B Bu moms PUN amen 10/09/03 sheet Mtb sheet number FLOOR PLAN A2.1 12 12 / vv rs muumuu ■ CONHNUE PATTERN AROUND AND ONTO EAST ELEVATION IL ❑RTH ELEVATI ❑N v8• =1'-0' 11 ALUM CIAO WOOD WINDOWS SURFACE APPUED ALUM JITTERS ■■ ■I. ■■ hh. ■ ■ COLORED ROCA FACE EMU• 1278716' PATTERN AS SHOWN es limmo ULM IL= iu_u. iu= COLORED BURNISHED MASONRY UNIT PIL45058S -4' PROJECTION FROM MCI 1678'216• COLOR'D BURN WIED MASONRY UNIT - 1278.116' STACK BOND ALUM. DOOR AND ENTRY ASSEMBLY OS❑UTH ELEVATI ❑N v8 = r -0• PREHN Mil PARAPET CAP FLASH STEM MOUNTED, SURFACE LIGHT MRAE•109. ROOF PROFILE BEHIND PARAPET SHOWN DASHED 3 COLOR BURNISHED MASONRY UNTT• 1278'216' RUNNING BOND COLORED ROCK MCI CMU• 1rIrX16' RUNNING BOND PRE EN6INEER'D STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF SYSTEM WI STEEL TRUSS ASSEMBLY, VENTED AMC, AND BATT INSUL rrm r .•. mv,sx. �. a, s'IplanNaan• OWEST ELEVATI ❑N J. 1' -0' ras wmmminn NEM MEE Walla MIM WM Man MN MOM TRUSS BEG. 880RYTRUSS BRO. 011. FIR T.0. n6. 19 PAINTED STE CANO %ASSEMBLY • 2 THUS enriching communities through architecture duiuth • oirginia • grand rapids • twin cities www.drgw.cnm CIRCLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 7868 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN Pn2reN date Jib name drawn by checked by name reg. B riga dot. signature 03098 July 07, 2003 NLR MIT MICHAEL I. THOMAS 23592 XXXXX XX, 2003 /hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was preparsd by oar or under my direct Eperobion and that 1 m a duly Licensed Architect under the hum of the State of Minnesota. mark reois onM,n. sheet title sheet number date 5148 & Bun0,N0 PLAN REVIEW 10/09/03 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5.1 SOFTIE 518' GYP.BD OVER METAL STUDS CO 24' O.C. 12'CMD OVER (2) LAYERS 1111 RIGID INSUL W/ METAL FURRING @24' 0.C. (ONE LAYER BORE THE OTHER VERT.) OVER 518' GYP BD. PRE ENGINEER'D STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF SYSTEM W/ STEEL TRUSS ASSEMBLY, VENTED ATTIC, AND BAIT INSUL ■E ■■ En ME ME .. IN MI WAY.T.:S.VITX.I. :. :211.! IL_ OBUILDING SECTI ❑N 2 TRUSS BRG. ENTRY TRUSS BRG. Fl N. RR. T.O. FTG. OCT 1 0 2003 me SOFRT r.c -MINGL NLINI. PRE ENGINEER'D STANDING SEAM METAL 5 /8'GYP.BD OVER B EIALSTUDS GO 24' 0.L W.IXtEL1Usum ROOF BLY,V W/ DATTI,AN ASSEMBLY,YENiEDAT1IC, AND BAIT INSUL ASSE BLY,V N/ VENTED ATTIC, ASSFMBLY,YENTED ATTIC, AND BATE INSUL me TRUSS BRG. At — II II 0 II I _ ENTRY TRUSS BRG. A: II la FlN. FLA AG ,/� %, „ „ V. ru PI n n WO • �r...w Y__. ,. ,: .. "= -..... --ter.. ,.: .._. .'° .^^-.^_""�. _,.. .. .. S Yin 12'CMUOVER (2) LAYEA511 /2' RIGID INSUL W/ METAL FURRING (024' 0.0 (ONE LAYER HORS THE OTHER VERT .) OVER _ �,-si UTJ: 1 T.O. FTG. 'RF.S E 5/8' GYP BD. UILDING SECTI ❑N enriching communities through architecture duiuth • oirgtnia • grand rapids • nein cities iooto.degar. m CIRCLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 7868 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN project ti 03098 dao july 07, 2003 1Ne nom. drown by WLR checked by MIT nam. MICHAEL J. THOMAS reg. t 23592 sign date XXXXX )(X, 2003 signutun I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report tow peepand by me or under my direct supervhion and that I m a duly Licensed Architect under the law's of the State of Minnesota. mark rsolrionFrwe sheet title sheet number date SITE & BUILDING PLAN REVIEW 10/09/03 BUILDING SECTION A6.1 / 0• / / CORE DRILL EX. STMH EC SINN 2 RDA 907.4 INV. 902.60 INV. 903.5 /CONCRETE SPILLWAY X903_ 70LF- 15"RCR CLIII ® 0.007" 26LF- 15 "RCP CLIII 0 1.07• / 15 "RCP FES INV. 903.80 76LF- 15 "RCI1 CLIII lay 0.00 %1 15 "RCP FE (2) INV. 904.0 \ 15 "RCP FES (2) INV. 904.0 REMOVE EXIST. CULVERT CONCRETE SPILLWAY r —E'ly Nine Lot 7 / ok !�� CUL / R MH RI M 9(4.0 INV. • '2.25 N89'05'08 "W \ 189.89 10LF -15 "RCP CLIII 0 0.32% CORE EX. 5 EX RIO 9•:7 INV. ''1.88 INV/ 902.05 / 30LF -8 "DIP • 50 WATERMAIN .ERVICE (7.5' MIN. 'OVER) 52LF -15 "RCP CLIII 0 0.325 CB 5 RIM 9 .0 INV. ' 02.50 bke '0 �� l , I,, s89 ps, S 0g., —_------907------- -_ -- 907-- -" — 70LF -6 "PVC SDR26 SANITARY SERVICE 0 1.0% MIN r: • VACATED LOIS LANE DOC. N0. 5104E93 243.19" LOIS LANE 9 5. An. of Lot 9 NE Coe. Lot 9 SE Coe. Lot 9 LEGEND ONE FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL - - - -905 - - - - - DENOTES CONTOUR • - DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT O - DENOTES MANHOLE • - DENOTES CATCHBASN IA* - DENOTES LIGHT POLE - DENOTES STREET SIGN -a -- DENOTES SIGN wm-9 -- DENOTES HYDRANT >a 0 - DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL a 0 - DENOTES ELECTRIC PEDESTAL Iv 0 - DENOTES CABLE TV PEDESTAL 990 - DENOTES MAILBOX O - DENOTES WOODEN POST — o -- DENOTES FENCE —ic -- DENOTES UG ELECTRIC UNE —L. -- DENOTES UG GAS UNE —�. -- DENOTES UG TELEPHONE UNE - DENOTES OVERHEAD POWER UNE ▪ - DENOTES BUSH M- G - DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE 24•EMPN - DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE O - DENOTES ELECTRIC HAND HOLE - DENOTES GAS MARKER - DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE - DENOTES WATER VALVE - DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER 0 A - DENOTES PROPOSED CATCHBASIN • - DENOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE - DENOTES PROPOSED WATERMAIN DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SMISIBLICIKILIMIES 1. EXISTING WATER PRESSURE (FROM CITY OF LINO LAKES) 919 GPM - 2' ORIFACE 60 PSI STATCE PRESSURE 53 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE 30 PSI PT 2. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL. PARKING AREA AFTER PROPOSEDC PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. 3. CONTRACTOR TO BEAVERTAIL PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER AT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES TO LAKE DRIVE AND LOIS LANE. 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS SHOWN ON PLAN. 5. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO EXISTING VFW BUILDING AT All TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 0 Ul z 5 Y J 0 z J o 0 U 0 U1 CONCRETE SPILLWAY SLOPE 189.89 PROPO SA DRIVEWAY\ APRON 906.02TC O7.52GL YI ■111 ■111■HINFIT■ UNI:YW li-P1 WV4.09SOPF)MVOI 907.26GL r LEGEND ONE FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL - - - -905- - - - - DENOTES CONTOUR • - DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT Q - DENOTES MANHOLE - DENOTES CATCHBASN - DENOTES LIGHT POLE .+. - DENOTES STREET SIGN --- DENOTES SIGN r1-- DENOTES HYDRANT Ta p - DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL .0 - DENOTES ELECTRIC PEDESTAL TYO - DENOTES CABLE TV PEDESTAL we - DENOTES MAILBOX - DENOTES WOODEN POST -0-- DENOTES FENCE - � -- DENOTES UG ELECTRIC UNE - �. -- DENOTES UG GAS UNE DENOTES UG TELEPHONE UNE --.• -- DENOTES OVERHEAD POWER UNE 0 - DENOTES BUSH z4'T62[Q - DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE r•2vR••4 - DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE - DENOTES ELECTRIC HAND HOLE • - DENOTES GAS MARKER O - DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE O - DENOTES WATER VALVE °07°6 - DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION 0�06.58a DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER • • 3 - DENOTES PROPOSED CATCHBASN • - DENOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE 907 - DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR - DENOTES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE I I I ■ 1 11 - - DENOTES EROSION CONTROL SILT FENCE ►•■.•∎ - DENOTES ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 0 30 OCT 1 0 2003 car/ / d" a W QXX 0 0� �I�Qyy I SAO G1 LAKE DRIVE SEED N28 °30'07"E SEED 27 SEED cb °C T 1 0 2003 CITY OF LINO LA: ES --" SEEBAITCH AREA SEED DITCH AREA EDVITCR AREA __- -, ERO 111-, , ■ ■ WrEhRSTIM • A Wf'ERO TOFI 3 MAHO ULCA 1, RICK PAVERS 7 CETD 3 FLAG P0115 WITH 3 PRECAST CONCRETE STEPPING ST¢NE5 23JUP0 9 CETO 9 HEMO IRRIGATION LOOP SHOWN GRAPHICALLY TO AREAS TO BE WATERED (IYP.) STMU /1' CONTOUR BERM 2 FRPE IRRIGATION LOOP t0 O / 1 _ I / \\ /� �� � • SEED \ v2 ' / 9 HEMO 1 VIPR 5 5PGF 5 IUPO 9 JUPO 1 VIPR 13 HEMO 11 ARME 23 HEMO 1 GLTR ( 3 GLTR IRRIGATION LOOP (1'P) 6. SHOWN GRAPHICALLY TO AREAS TO BE WATERED (TYP) / / / / / ! e' ae 4S �O i SO g f11r - � V moo' „,- co, / o IRRIGATION LOOP • / Co IRRIGATION LOOP SHOWN GRAPHICALLY TO AREAS TO BE WATERED OYPJ re-,-LANDSCAPE PLAN CIRCLE -LEX -VFW 20• lion•tte I cO f 4. 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1. - 20' enriching communities through architecture dulutb • oirgbsia • grand r°pids • hobs cities tou: edsg,aaow CIRCLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 7868 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN projects 03098 date July 07, 2003 Jil. aa.w 03098 - LAND - SITE -CL -VFW draw, by T5 checked by MMA WM! MICHAEL THOMAS reg. # 23592 sign date )0000( XX, 2003 Signature 2 hereby certify matins plan, spedfGnNan, r ender tow my prepared by direct supervision and that 1 w e duly Lasesed dictated under the law of the State of Minnerota. oath revision/ bar alms' title sheet nuwbr date 5111 & Bu"a,ra Pun REMew 10/09/03 LANDSCAPE PLAN CIRCLE -LOX L1.0 • PLANT LIST QUAN. CODF BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SI7F CONDITION 2 FRPE FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA'SUMMIT' SUMMIT ASH 3" CAL. B &B 4 GLTR GLEDISTSIA TRIACANTHOS 'IMPCOLE' IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST 3" CAL. B &B 3 ULCA MAHO ULMUS 'CATHEDRAL' MALUS 'HOPA1 - CATHEDRAL ELM HOPA CRABAPPLE 3" CAL. 7' HT. B &B B &B 18 ARME ARONIA MELONOCARPA GLOSSY BLACK CHOKEBERRY 36 ". B &B 5 62 20 136 72 VIPR JUPO SPGF CETO HEMO VIBURNUM PRUNIFOLIUM JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'PRINCE OF WALES' BLACKHAW VIBURNUM PRINCE OF WALES JUNIPER GOLDFLAME SPIREA SNOW IN SUMMER _._sees- ...._..._._.__.__... STELLA DE ORO DAYLILIES 4' HT. B &B i 5 GAL. 1 I SPIREA X BUMALDA 'GOLDFLAME' CERASTIUM TOMENTOSUM — ._..._.,... HEMEROCALLIS'STELLA DE ORO' 5 GAL. QTS. 112" O.c. __ .. —._.. , —.. -- 1 GAL. .24" O.c. STMU STONE MULCH WITH WEED BARRIER I IRRIGATION LOOP SHOWN GRAPHICALLY TO AREAS TO BE WATERED OYPJ re-,-LANDSCAPE PLAN CIRCLE -LEX -VFW 20• lion•tte I cO f 4. 10' 20' 40' SCALE: 1. - 20' enriching communities through architecture dulutb • oirgbsia • grand r°pids • hobs cities tou: edsg,aaow CIRCLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 7868 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN projects 03098 date July 07, 2003 Jil. aa.w 03098 - LAND - SITE -CL -VFW draw, by T5 checked by MMA WM! MICHAEL THOMAS reg. # 23592 sign date )0000( XX, 2003 Signature 2 hereby certify matins plan, spedfGnNan, r ender tow my prepared by direct supervision and that 1 w e duly Lasesed dictated under the law of the State of Minnerota. oath revision/ bar alms' title sheet nuwbr date 5111 & Bu"a,ra Pun REMew 10/09/03 LANDSCAPE PLAN CIRCLE -LOX L1.0 • RUNE CROSSING OR INJURED LIMBS IN CROWN EMOVE BINDING FROM TRUNK OF TREE EEP MULCH 1m AWAY FROM TRUNK SHREDDED BARK MULCH SLOPE FOR DRAINAGE ED BARRIER ENTIRE ISLAND SET ROOTBALL 2m -3m ABOVE GRADE /2TOPSOIL/ 1/2 PLANTING MIXTURE DEPTH OF SOIL TO BE 1 1/2 THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL ONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER NISHED GRADE /3 PULVERIZED EXISTING CLAY AND 1/3 PLANTING MIXTURE, TAMP UGHTLY - RETAIN BURLAP & TWINE AROUND ROOT BALL �0 NOT OVERDIG DEPTH OF HOLE EXISTING GRAVEL ()PLANTING DETAILS -SHADE TREE IN ISLAND N.TS. EMOVE BINDING FROM TRUNK OF TREE EEP MULCH 1m AWAY FROM TRUNK SHREDDED BARK MULCH SAUCER OOTBALL 2' -3' ABOVE GRADE NISHED GRADE 1/2 TOPSOIL/ 1/2 PLANTING MIXTURE SHAPED TO CREATE SAUCER OLE DIAMETER TO BE TWICE BALL WIDTH /3 PULVERIZED EXISTING CLAY AND TOPSOIL MIXTURE THEN TAMP UGHTLY ETAIN BURLAP & TWINE AROUND ROOT BALL t0 NOT OVERDIG DEPTH OF HOLE NDISTURBED SOIL PLANTING DETAILS -SHADE TREE ON.iS. NOTE —NEVER WT LEADERS —PRUNE ONLY TO REMOVE DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES ERENNIAL (SEE PLAN11JST) OVEL WT BEDUNE WHERE ADJACENT TO LAWN /2• SHREDDED HARDBARK MULCH TO COVER FINISHED GRADE SOIL MIXTURE, PLANTING MIXTURE ROOT COLLAR AT FINISHED GRADE MULCH 2• AWAY FROM BASE OF SHRUB • SHREDDED BARK MULCH, MOUND TO FORM SAUCER as GRADE 1/2 TOPSOIL/ 1/2 PLANTING MIXTURE SHAPED TO CREATE SAUCER 2/3 PULVERIZED EXISRNG CLAY AND TOPSOIL MIXTURE, TAMP UGHTLY CUT STRING AT BASE OF SHRUB ONLY, RETAIN WRAF AROUND BALL + NOT 0900010 DEPTH OF HOLE NDISTURBED SOIL KEEP MULCH 1' AWAY FROM TRUNK OF TREE 3• SHREDDED BARK MULCH, MOUND TO FORM SAUCER FINISHED GRADE SHAPED TO CREATEPSAUCER MIXTURE 2/3 PULVERIZE EXISTING CLAY, TAMP UGHTLY REMOVE BINDING AT BASE OF MAIN LEADER ONLY, RETAIN BURLAP AND TWINE AROUND PLANT BALL 00 NOT OVEROIC DEPTH OF HOLE UNDISTURBED SOIL (-:;PLANTING DETAILS - PERRENIALS N.TS. ()PLANTING DETAILS - DECIDUOUS SHRUB N.TS. OPLANTING DETAILS - STAKED EVERGREEN TREE N.TS. enriching communities through architecture dututh • oirginia • grand rapids • twin cities town/dip/sou CII R�CLE -LEX VFW POST #6583 7868 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN project It date JNe name drawn by checked by name rsg. t sign dart signature 03098 July 07, 2003 03098-LAND-SITE-CL-VFW TS MMA MICHAEL J. THOMAS 23592 XXXXX XX, 2003 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report tom prepared by me or under mg direct supervision and that 1 m a duly Licenad Architect under the laic. of the State of Minnesota. nark reoisionlrsa . shat tithe sheet manlier dare Errs 8 Bunions Pun REVIEW 10/09/03 LANDSCAPE DETAILS CIRCLE -LEX L2.0 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Symbol LIANA Ory CelelOg N0n0 r Oe3116p50, Lamp Rh Lumens LLF Weft 0 8 3 3E3417 PERIMETER SECURITY PERIMETER CU 175 WATTAN4 SE3417.1m 14000 1.00 210 Q A 3 PRNO 10' PARKING/ROADWAY /TYPE 10 400 WAIT AIM PR440.iea 36000 1.00 455 oc• o C 1 PR440 15' PARKING/ROADWAY /TYPE III 400WA1TMH PR440.3as 35000 1.00 1020 79TH STRE 1.0 a. 4k } illi11111111111111111 0.3 0.9 +3.3 \! .0 2.9 +1.7 `1®r ` A 4.4 A 4.9 A +23 +5 -2 ' 4 r14 1111 ;•I P WC : TrnL 424 —+1. • LOIS LANE • SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN r= 3C-0" 0.0 0.0 0.0 OCT 3 0 2003 CITY r. I T1— PHOTOMETRICS 0 SCALE 1'.30' -0' K 0 a a 0 ro CD co W Q I— O Et Eli 0 z a- z QN X J W. W Y C I J w CC) O U 00 Z � ICJ U SHEET: EP OF - J • • AGENDA ITEM V. B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: November 12, 2003 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit For A Church In the Rural Zoning District Eagle Brook Church BACKGROUND Eagle Brook Church proposes to construct a new facility on 90+ acres on 20th Ave., north of 77th St. A church is a conditional use in the Rural zoning district. The required site and building plan review is an administrative review, but the review elements are relevant to the conditional use permit. The application includes the request for an increase in building height that can be included in a conditional use permit. The City processed an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) on this project in the last year. That review examined the potential environmental impacts of the project. The design reflected in the current application used information gathered during the EAW process. ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning Comprehensive Plan: According to the comprehensive plan, the project site is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. In addition to land use categories, the comprehensive plan designates growth areas for pre -2010 and 2010 -2020 time periods. The site is split between stage one and stage two areas. These growth areas pertain to when city utilities (sewer and water) may be made available for the area in question in order to support residential development. Since the project does not comprise residential development and it does not rely on city utilities, the growth areas are immediately relevant to the church proposal. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use (Comp. Plan) Zoning Site agriculture Low Density Sewered Resid. Rural North rural residential Rural Rural South rural resid., agric. Low Density Sewered Resid. Rural East rural resid., agric. Medium Density Resid. Rural West Peltier Lake Low Dens. Sewered Resid., Public /Semi - Public Rural • • Eagle Brook Church page 2 The comprehensive plan does not establish a separate land use category specifically for churches. Several existing church properties on large parcels are designated as Public /Semi Public land use, as are parks and the City Hall location. There is no way to predict where a church may want to locate in the city, and there are no guidelines in the comprehensive plan for locating churches. The comprehensive plan creates seven planning districts across the city that include recommendations for the specified areas. The project site is within planning district six. No recommendations refer to the specific site or to churches. The only recommendation that refers to anything specific to the immediate area states that the city will work with the City of Centerville to facilitate the future improvement of 20th Ave. The comprehensive plan also establishes conceptual greenways on the land use map. Greenways are corridors of protected open space managed for conservation and recreational purposes. The city has no ownership or other rights to greenways simply because they appear on the conceptual map. They are to be further defined as individual development projects arise, in cooperation with the site developer. A conceptual greenway overlaps the northwestern portion of the project site. This area of the site consists of wetlands and woodlands and is not intended for development. The site plan indicates only a stormwater pond in the envisioned greenway. The rest of the development would be on the eastern portion of the site. The church plan is compatible with the city's greenway corridor plan by preserving the envisioned greenway area as open space. In fact, the church is proposing a conservation and wetland easement over the southwestern portion of the site. Zoning: The site is in a Rural zoning district. A church is a conditional use in this zone. Much of the site is within the shoreland overlay zone that covers land within 1000 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of Peltier Lake. The submittal compares with the Rural zoning and shoreland standards as follows: • • • Eagle Brook Church page 3 Shoreland: The site is within a shoreland overlay district. This overlay includes land within 1000 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of Lake Peltier. The Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources (DNR) establishes the OHWL for water bodies designated as protected waters. The DNR had not previously determined the OHWL for Peltier Lake. As a result of the proposal of this project, the DNR determined the OHWL last year at 884.7. The overlay zone and the shoreland setbacks within it are measured from this elevation. The City shoreland ordinance regulates uses in the overlay district. A shoreland overlay allows the uses allowed by the underlying zoning. A church is allowed in the underlying Rural zoning district as a conditional use (see Item 27). Likewise, lot dimensions are those of the underlying zoning: 10 acre minimum for any new lots, with a 330 ft. minimum width of road frontage as well as at the OHWL. The existing property exceeds these minimum size requirements. The shoreland ordinance classifies Peltier Lake as a natural environment lake. Structures, septic systems, and parking must meet the minimum 150 ft. setback. The project meets these requirements. Structures must be screened from the water. The existing tree and vegetative growth provides an adequate screen. Churches are exempted from the 36 ft. maximum height in a shoreland zone. The lowest floor elevation must be 3 ft. above OHWL, so the floor must be at least 887.7 to meet the shoreland requirement. The low floor elevation is 896. SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Site: The site includes 91 acres, 90 acres without right of way. It is located in the southeast quarter of Section 11, starting about 1/8 mile north of 77`h St.. At its widest Required Proposed Lot size minimum 10 acres 95 acres Lot width minimum 330' 1500' + Setbacks: buildings from street rear lot line side lot line parking from street rear lot line side lot line Shoreland: from OHWL 40' 30' 10', 50' CUP no stated reqs. no stated reqs. no stated reqs. 150' 600' 600' 250' 200' 500' 50' 700' 500' septic Bldg. height 35' 60' church spires 50' 60' "spire" Impervious max. 60% max. (shoreland) 23% Shoreland: The site is within a shoreland overlay district. This overlay includes land within 1000 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of Lake Peltier. The Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources (DNR) establishes the OHWL for water bodies designated as protected waters. The DNR had not previously determined the OHWL for Peltier Lake. As a result of the proposal of this project, the DNR determined the OHWL last year at 884.7. The overlay zone and the shoreland setbacks within it are measured from this elevation. The City shoreland ordinance regulates uses in the overlay district. A shoreland overlay allows the uses allowed by the underlying zoning. A church is allowed in the underlying Rural zoning district as a conditional use (see Item 27). Likewise, lot dimensions are those of the underlying zoning: 10 acre minimum for any new lots, with a 330 ft. minimum width of road frontage as well as at the OHWL. The existing property exceeds these minimum size requirements. The shoreland ordinance classifies Peltier Lake as a natural environment lake. Structures, septic systems, and parking must meet the minimum 150 ft. setback. The project meets these requirements. Structures must be screened from the water. The existing tree and vegetative growth provides an adequate screen. Churches are exempted from the 36 ft. maximum height in a shoreland zone. The lowest floor elevation must be 3 ft. above OHWL, so the floor must be at least 887.7 to meet the shoreland requirement. The low floor elevation is 896. SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Site: The site includes 91 acres, 90 acres without right of way. It is located in the southeast quarter of Section 11, starting about 1/8 mile north of 77`h St.. At its widest • • Eagle Brook Church page 4 point, the property stretches from 20th Ave. to Peltier Lake. The site consists of several individual parcels. (These should be combined into one tax parcel as a condition of approval should the application be approved.) The site has been used for crop production. The western part of the site includes some wetland along and near the lake. Another wetland is n the northeast corner of the site. These are discussed further below. County Ditch 72 runs through the site into one of the wetlands. The stormwater management design is one of the most important aspects of the project from an environmental perspective. This is discussed below. The lake is in the Regional Park Reserve. Land between the proposed church site and the lake is owned by the City of St. Paul Water Services, but is likely to be purchased by the County to add to the park reserve. The EAW raised the possibility of trail connections to the park reserve. However, the land there is primarily wetland and the County has no plan for trails through it. Existing House: A house, garage, barn, and silo exist in the south central part of the site. The proposal is for these to remain. This is not an environmental issue , and did not come to light during the EAW review. However, it is a site design issue and must be addressed now. The existence of two principal structures on one lot is not allowed under our zoning ordinance except with a planned unit development (PUD). There must be some justification for the flexibility allowed with a PUD. Alternatively, a separate 10 -acre lot would need to be created for the house. The two uses would be sharing a driveway, which would require shared access easements and possibly other legal arrangements. Such a design is not acceptable under normal development requirements. If a unique arrangement is to be made, it should be proposed so the City can review it. Conservation Easement: The second largest heron rookery in the Metro area is on the island in Peltier Lake. The birds forage for nesting material on the shores of the project property. The church has agreed to cooperate with environmental groups, including the Mn DNR and Anoka County Parks, to manage the shore area in a way that supports the foraging activity. The church is proposing a conservation easement in the southwest part of the property. This would include the wetland area there as well as land betwee the wetland and the lake. The proposed holder and terms of this easement have not been explained. Building: The proposed church is a two -story structure. The first floor footprint would include 57,463 sf. The second floor has 26, 894 sf, for a total of 84, 357 sf. (These data replace inaccurate totals in the table on the floor plan sheet.) The worship area includes seats on both the first and second levels, for a total of 2100. The building also includes six classrooms and seven childcare rooms. • • • Eagle Brook Church page 5 The exterior of the building includes a variety of colors, materials, and finishes. The tallest walls are buff colored, precast concrete panels with a sandblasted finish. Areas of the lower walls also are precast concrete panels with a sandblasted, of a reddish color. Lighter color stone makes up most of the rest of the larger wall area material. The southeast corner of the larger portion of the building includes a glass curtain wall. Fire suppression sprinklers will be required. This need will be filled with an underground storage tank of 30,000 gallons of water. Such onsite storage and pump systems must meet state fire and building code requirements. Building Height: The maximum building height in the Rural zone is 35', though church spires may go up to 60'. Building heights in excess of these may be allowed through a conditional use permit if they meet specific conditions. These are described below under the conditional use permit heading. The height of the top of the exterior walls is 50'. A tower, or spire, is 60'. The CUP application includes the request for the 50' building height. Lighting: City requirements allow no more than 0.4 foot candles at the residential property line and no more than 1.0 at street right of way lines. All exterior fixtures must be 90 degree cutoff fixtures. The photometric plan dated 10/14/03 and the fixture cut sheets meet these requirements. The primary purpose of the lighting restrictions is to minimize affecting the ability to enjoy the night sky. The EAW review raised the issue of the large parking lot being lit at night. If the project proceeds, the City should attach requirements that the parking lighting is turned off after events. Signage: Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed upon submittal of sign permit applications. Landscaping, Tree Preservation, Screening: The landscaping plan includes a variety of trees along property lines and within the site. The majority of the site will be planted with native grasses. Areas adjacent to the building will be sod. Rain gardens (infiltration areas) are distributed around the and within the parking lot, and will be planted with appropriate seeding. Almost all trees on the site will remain undisturbed. The lake shore and wetlands are heavily wooded and trees there will not be disturbed. Existing coniferous tree stands on the southern portion of the site will remain. Some trees along the road will be transplanted to accommodate driveways. The plan proposes prairie grass for large areas of the site. A management plan for this is advisable. It is impossible to completely screen such a large property. However, it may be desirable to increase screening in specific areas. • Eagle Brook Church page 6 Utilities: A well will be drilled to provide water. The church will construct an onsite wastewater treatment system. The City has requested the assistance of the Anoka County Community Health & Environmental Services Dept. to review the final design of the wastewater treatment system. That department reviewed the preliminary design report and found the concept sound. The system must meet state and county standards. In the event that public sewer is available in the project area, it would be best for the church to connect. At this time, there are no proposals to extend public sewer or water to the area. It is always a good idea for any property owner to consider such a future connection when designing a site. The utility plan includes locations for future water and sanitary sewer connections. The City supports designing for a future connection. The City may require a condition of approval, as part of the conditional use permit, that the church connect to a public sewer within 24 months of the public system becoming available. As a condition of plan approval, utility related modifications and comments as set forth in the City Engineer's memo should to be incorporated into the final plans. Wetlands and Stormwater Management: Four wetlands are located on or partially on the project site. One is part of the shoreline of the lake in the southwest part • of the site. Another is near, a depression surrounded by wooded upland. These two will not be disturbed by the proposed church project. • A third.wetland is a swale in the northwest area of the site which is surrounded with tilled farmland. The fourth is on the northeast corner of the site is part of a larger wetland located mostly north of the site. These two wetlands are drainageways and have been degraded by agricultural runoff and are vegetated primarily with reed canary grass. The plans show a voluntary 25' setback from the wetlands. No building or pavement would be placed in these areas. Under City requirements, all wetlands must be protected with a drainage and utility easement. This could be enlarged to include the 25' setback. County Ditch 72 is an underground draintile, including the stretch crossing the property. The main branch of County Ditch 72 begins about 4300 feet southeast of the site. Branch 1 of the ditch begins about 2500 feet south of the site. These merge on the site, then drain into the swale wetland, which then runs into the lake. Currently, there is no pretreatment of runoff in the tile ditch system or runoff from the agricultural land before it flows into the wetlands and lake. The proposed stormwater design shows that runoff will be collected by a series of swales, infiltration areas /rain gardens, and stormwater ponds, providing pretreatment of all runoff from the development. The Rice Creek Watershed District has review authority over the stormwater design. The county ditch will be rerouted, in a new underground draintile, around the development • • Eagle Brook Church page 7 area. This was required by the Watershed in lieu of the suggestion to daylight the underground "ditch" and make it an actual surface ditch. The new underground tile will daylight in a location similar to the existing tile, and discharge into the wetland. The capacity of the tile will not be changed. The ditch must not be impeded so as to cause flooding. On the other hand, increasing the ditch's capacity could drain wetlands in the area. Therefore, design of any work that affects the ditch must maintain ditch capacity. As noted in the TKDA memo, we did not receive sufficient hydraulic calculations to provide for a complete review. In addition, additional information is needed to ensure proper road drainage as well as flow from properties to the south. The applicant will be required to enter into a ponding maintenance agreement with the city. Drainage and utility easements must be created over all ponds and wetlands. Easements must be placed over the relocated draintile for Co. Ditch 72 and deeded to the Rice Creek Watershed District As a condition of plan approval, the grading and drainage related modifications and comments as set forth in the City Engineer's memo should to be incorporated into the plans. Floodplain: The city has a floodplain management ordinance. The 100 -year flood elevation, which defines the floodplain, is 887. The western portion of the site is within the floodplain. Lowest floor elevations of structures must be at least one foot above this elevation. The church building pad is not within the floodplain and is at an elevation of 896. Access, Circulation, Parking Right Of Way: The site fronts on 20th Ave., CSAH 21, a minor arterial roadway. Ultimately, Anoka County will need a total width of 120' of right of way, or 60' on each side of the centerline. Currently, it is 33'. The Church is proposing to dedicate an additional 30' to accommodate turn lanes for the new access driveways. Access, Circulation: The proposal includes two new driveways onto 20th Ave. Southbound right and northbound left turn lanes would be constructed for vehicles entering the north driveway. This would be the entry point during church events. The southern driveway would be the exit during events. This would be managed by traffic control personnel at the driveways. During non -event times, both driveways could be used for entry and exit. As noted in the TKDA memo, the submitted plans do not provide clear information regarding the road improvements. This is necessary for a complete review. The design of access on any development project should consider not only the specific site, but potential future development on adjacent properties. The EAW review raised the question of creating road easements to provide public roads to accommodate future • • Eagle Brook Church page 8 redevelopment of properties on the north and south of the site. The application does not include that option, but it is worth consideration. There are numerous private driveways along 20th Ave. Just 700 feet south of the site is the 77th St. intersection, and Rehbein St. is 400 feet south of that. The City's comprehensive plan guides the 10 -acre properties on the south for sewered development. Though the present owners may have no intention to subdivide in the immediate future, it is probable that the ten -acre properties to the south will subdivide sometime in the future once public sewer and water are available to the area. This is nothing unusual. If fact, it is the norm, and the City should plan for it. Planning for potential future development includes determining good locations for roads to serve future development. The project proposal includes adding two new accesses to CSAH 21 that serve only one property. One way to mitigate the potential impacts of creating these additional conflict points is to design them to accommodate future public roads. Dedication of road _ easements on the north and south boundaries of the project site would support this. However, 77th St. also could provide the access for the future development to the south of the church site. Future development of that land would then be required to install public utilities and reconstruct 77th St. to accommodate the additional traffic. Therefore, we do not believe it necessary to require additional public road easements. Parking: The plan provides for adequate parking, as indicated in the table below. It is possible that the church will expand in the future. The EAW analysis included the potential expansion. If the hypothetical expansion of 700 seats occurs, it would require an additional 233 parking spaces. The plan accommodates this potential with a grassy area south of the western parking lot area. It is common practice in Lino Lakes to attempt to minimize the impervious surface. Only 23% of the site will be impervious surface. The plan proposes 47 more parking spaces than required. The elimination of 47 spaces would amount to one double row. This would not accomplish much and would negatively affect the circulation design within the parking lot. Traffic: For several reasons, traffic is the most difficult issue to address. The traffic analysis prepared for the EAW concluded that the peak periods will create unacceptable levels of service at 35E ramps and at 20th Ave. /Main St. Under the City's site plan and CUP requirements, this would be justification for denial of a project unless Zoning Ord. Parking Space Requirement Spaces Required Spaces Provided worship area: 2100 seats 1 space per 3 seats 700 other 1 per classroom, other 13 total 713 760 plus potential for addl. 300+ It is common practice in Lino Lakes to attempt to minimize the impervious surface. Only 23% of the site will be impervious surface. The plan proposes 47 more parking spaces than required. The elimination of 47 spaces would amount to one double row. This would not accomplish much and would negatively affect the circulation design within the parking lot. Traffic: For several reasons, traffic is the most difficult issue to address. The traffic analysis prepared for the EAW concluded that the peak periods will create unacceptable levels of service at 35E ramps and at 20th Ave. /Main St. Under the City's site plan and CUP requirements, this would be justification for denial of a project unless Eagle Brook Church page 9 • the project applicant proposes a way to resolve the level of service problem. (See criteria "d" under Conditional Use Permit general criteria.) • The difficulty arises when looking at the larger picture. The 20`h Ave. /Main St. intersection is 1 '/2 miles from the proposed church site. This is quite a distance for establishing levels of service for roadways. In addition, that intersection is in another municipality (Centerville). Lino Lakes cannot require road improvements at a location over which Lino Lakes has no jurisdiction. These questions loom even larger in relation to the I -35E interchange. Clearly, no project applicant can reconstruct a freeway interchange unless the proposed development project is huge enough to cover the costs. (For example, a large shopping mall, sports arena, or commercial development such as the Best Buy site in Richfield.) Both MnDOT and Anoka County would have to be involved in such a project, An even more difficult question arises in considering the implications of denying the project because of the traffic impacts. Land in the vicinity of the interchange is guided and zoned for commercial and industrial development. If a retail, office, or4ndustrial project is proposed in that area, we would have to deny it as well unless the interchange were reconstructed to handle the traffic. Forty acres of retail development will generate far more traffic than the proposed church. The level of service (LOS) criteria are listed below. Staff suggests that P & Z discuss these criteria and their implications for the City prior to making a recommendation on the church application. Staff cannot make a recommendation without such discussion. Conditional Use Permit There are general criteria for all CUPs and specific conditions that apply to private clubs. General Criteria: The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds the following criteria have been met: a. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: Land Use Plan, Transportation Plan, Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans, Local Water Management Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, Policy Plan, Natural Environment Plan. • The proposed project poses no conflicts with these pieces of the comprehensive plan. b. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. • The site is guided for single family sewered development. This does not exclude churches, which typically are in single family zones. The majority of • • Eagle Brook Church page 10 the site will remain as undeveloped open space (only23% impervious surface). The lakeshore area will be protected and managed to provide a foraging area for birds in the heron rookery. c. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. • As noted in the report, several issues require clarification with additional information. d. Traffic generated by a proposed . development application is within the capabilities of the City when: 1) If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. 2) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. 3) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below. D. 4) The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. 5) Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic_from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. 6) The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer - financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. 7) The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I- 35W /Lake Drive or I- 35E/Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties, that contribute to traffic at the interchange. 8) The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. • See discussion above under "Traffic ". e. The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. f. The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer system. • The proposed new building would have its own well and onsite wastewater treatment system. • Eagle Brook Church page 11 g. The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. • There will be no city capital expenditures for this project. h. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. • The project will generate traffic. The parking lot will be lit. _The traffic requires consideration, as discussed above. The lighting will be comply with city requirements. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. • The EAW review process concluded that the project would have no significant environmental impacts. Specific Conditions: Churches are allowed as conditional uses in the Rural zone provided that: a. Side yard setbacks shall not be less than fifty (50) feet. b. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. • c. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 5 of this Ordinance and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance.. • The project complies with the required setbacks. Screening bears further consideration. The plans include adequate parking. Building Height: The maximum building height in the Rural zone is 35', though church spires may go up to 60'. Building heights in excess of these may be allowed through a conditional use permit provided that: a. Demonstrated need is established for the increase in height and said increase will not violate the intent and character of the zoning district in which the structure is located. ._ • Contemporary churches are commonly large, tall buildings. The large worship space requires a tall structure. • b. The site is capable of accommodating the increased structure size. • At 90 acres, the site can accommodate the additional building height. • Eagle Brook Church page 12 c. The potential increased intensity and size of use does not cause an increase in traffic volumes beyond the capacity of the surrounding streets. • The additional 14' of building height does not increase traffic volume. d. Public utilities and services are adequate. • The church will construct its own water and sanitary sewer facilities. e. For each additional story over the district limitation or for each additional ten (10) feet above the maximum allowed per district, front and side yard setback requirements shall be increased by ten (10) percent. • As noted in the zoning standards table above, the setbacks are well beyond minimum requirements. f. The construction does not limit solar access to abutting and/or neighboring properties. A shadow study shall be required illustrating shadow encroachment on adjoining properties. • We have not yet received the shadow study. This is pending. g. The provisions of Section 2, Subd. 2. of this Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. • This refers to the general CUP criteria discussed above. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on October 29, 2003. Their comments are attached . This report addresses the parking issue, stormwater, conservation easement, utility connections, screening, and prairie management, and lighting. Phosphorous is being reviewed by the City Engineer. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending tabling this application to the December meeting. There are numerous unresolved issues that include fundamental site design elements. These include the existing house on the site, clarifications of drainage design issues, clarification of roadway design issues, and traffic management policies. The list below includes the issues that definitely need to be addressed before P & Z approval (the first four), as well as conditions that should be attached to the eventual approval. 1. The future of the existing house and other buildings must be resolved. 2. Information needed for review of the stormwater management design must be provided, as discussed in the City Engineer's memo. • • Eagle Brook Church page 13 3. Information needed for review of the roadway improvements must be provided, as discussed in the City Engineer's memo. 4. Traffic criteria and policy must be considered as it applies to the application and other development in the eastern part of the city. 5. The separate parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel. The applicant must submit documentation that a lot combination has been filed with Anoka County prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County for 20th Ave. (CSAH 21), as indicated on the plans. A deed for this right of way shall be filed prior to building permit issuance. 7. All necessary permits shall be obtained by the applicant from Anoka County for work in the 20th Ave. (CSAH 21) right of way. 8. Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. 9. Additional screening shall be added on a revised landscaping plan. 10. Drainage and utility easements must be created over all ponds and wetlands. These must include land 25' from the delineated wetland edge, as proposed on the plans.. 11. Easements must be placed over the relocated draintile for Co. Ditch 72 and deeded to the Rice Creek Watershed District. 12. Issues listed in the November 5th me mo by the City Engineer must be resolved to his satisfaction. 13. Any existing wells or onsite septic system for the house that exists on the site must be located and properly abandoned. 14. Stop signs shall be installed for vehicles exiting both driveways. The signs shall not be in the right of way. 15. The church shall enter into a site performance agreement prior to issuance of a building permit. 16. The church shall enter into a maintenance agreement for the stormwater facilities. 17. A management plan for the prairie areas should be prepared. 18. Traffic control personnel shall be employed during peak periods at the I -35E interchange, at the 20th Ave. and Main St. intersection, and at the access driveways to the site. 19. During church services and large events, the northern driveway shall be entry only and the south driveway shall be exit only. Traffic control personnel shall be present at the driveways to assure this. 20. Parking lot lighting shall be turned off no later than two hours after services or other events at night. 21. The terms of the conservation easement must be established. This review is based on the following submittals, received October 13, 2003: 1. Certificate of Survey, SRF, 10/10/03 2. Site Plan, BWBR and SRF, 10/13/03 Eagle Brook Church page 14 • 3. Grading Plan, BWBR and SRF, 10/13/03 4. Utility Plan, BWBR and SRF, 10/13/03 5. Landscaping Plan, BWBR, 10/13/03 6. Tree Preservation Plan, BWBR, 10/13/03 7. First and Second Floor Plans, BWBR, 10/13/03, corrected square footages e -mail from Ron Laughlin, BWBR 8. Building Elevations, BWBR, 10/13/03 9. Photometric Plan, BWBR and Ericksen Ellison and Assoc., 10/14/03, received 10/15/03 10. Lighting Fixture cutsheets, Lithonia Lighting 11. Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Final Design Report and Specifications, Eco Systems Engineering, Oct. 8, 2003 12. Narrative, SRF 13. Description of Fire Protection System and Electrical Generator System, Memorandum, Ericksen Ellison and Assoc., 10/13/03 • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Eagle Brook Church Copies To: 1500 Piper Jaflray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Comm. No. 12701 -002 From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Routing: Date: November 5, 2003 The City of Lino Lakes has received plans providing for the construction of a church facility on a 91 acre site located east of 20th Avenue North and north of 77th Street East. The following document copies have been provided for review: 1. Land Use Application dated October 13, 2003. 2. Full size and 11X17 -size Application for Conditional Use permit plan set (14 sheets) dated October 13, 2003. • 3. Lighting Details dated October 13, 2003. • 4. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) dated October 21, 2002. 5. Review memorandum from Jeff Smyser of the City of Lino Lakes to James Studenski of the City of Lino Lakes dated October 29, 2003. 6. City of Lino Lakes Resolution No. 03-44 making a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), including finding of facts supporting the decision, and City responses to EAW comments. 7. City of Lino Lakes Conditional Use Permit Narrative, prepared by SRF Consulting Group, Inc., received by the City of Lino Lakes October 13, 2003. 8. Eagle Brook Church Traffic Study conducted by SRF Consulting Group dated September 13, 2002, and review comments to the traffic study by TKDA, dated September 16, 2002. 9. Description of Fire Protection System and Electrical Generator System by Ericksen Ellison, and Associates, Inc., dated October 13, 2003. 10. Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Final Design Report and Specifications for Eagle Brook Church, dated October 8, 2003. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Eagle Brook Church Review Page 2 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 11. Copy of Rice Creek Watershed District Permit (RCWD) Application Number 03 -073 CAPROC (Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes). An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared and has received extensive review by the general public, the City of Lino Lakes, and other governing agencies. It should be noted that under the thresholds established under State of Minnesota rules, an EAW was not required for this project. However, the EAW has provided the opportunity to more thoroughly provide comment and address specific issues in more detail. As a result of the EAW, many issues and resulting comments have already been addressed by the City other agencies through the review process. The intent of this review memorandum is to provide comments for the recently submitted preliminary grading and utility plans, and to provide additional comments on issues that may have already been addressed. It should be noted that full size and 11X17 -size Application for Conditional Use permit plan sets (14 sheets) dated October 13, 2003 have been provided. These plans are considered adequate for preliminary review at this time, but are incomplete for actual construction purposes. It is expected that construction plans will ultimately be submitted as part of the approval process. General Comments - Issues Addressed in EAW Traffic and Roadways • A traffic study was conducted by SRF Consulting Group dated September 13, 2002, and reviewed by TKDA in a memo dated September 16, 2002. A response to traffic concerns is presented in more detail in the City's formal response to the EAW comments, dated May 13, 2003. In general, the greatest traffic generation would be on Sundays, with much smaller amounts during the week. Projected traffic to be generated by future residential and/or other development in this area will also contribute much higher amounts of traffic, particularly during week days. • Roadway and infrastructure improvements will be needed in this area with or without the proposed church. This not only includes lands immediately adjacent to the church site, but nearby areas of Centerville, Hugo, and Columbus Township. The three cities of Lino Lakes, Hugo, and Centerville have been collectively meeting regularly and planning for future infrastructure needs. Nevertheless, the Church will be required to address more immediate traffic issues. Based on the data provided, the Church will need to provide mitigative traffic control measures on Sunday mornings at the intersections of Main Street with 20th Avenue North (County Road 21) and the freeway ramps, and at the church entrance on 20th Avenue North. The intersection of Main Street with the I -35E ramps is of particular concem. According to the traffic study, peak traffic to and from the Church site (on Sunday mornings) will require additional traffic measures by the church, even with proposed improvements to Main Street. It is recommended that the City work with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation as expeditiously as possible to secure funding and schedule improvements, regardless of church construction or not. • • Eagle Brook Church Review Page 3 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota The church has engaged in discussions with Anoka County to establish appropriate access points on County Road 21, and necessary improvements (widening and turn lanes). Access points must consider centralizing access points with future development to limit the total number of access points for safety purposes. Dedication of additional right of way will also be required by the County. A total dedication of 60 -feet from the centerline of the right of way is typically required by Anoka County, and is shown per the site plan. Stormwater Management. A CAPROC (Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes) has been received from the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The CAPROC lists several outstanding items (primarily administrative) that must be addressed or received prior to the approval of a formal permit. Rice Creek Watershed District Permit Application Number 03 -073 may be referred to for further details regarding the CAPROC conditions. An item of particular note is Anoka County Ditch No. 72 (Main and Branch 1), that runs through the church site and exists as drain tile. This ditch is regulated by RCWD. No current easement of record for the ditch has been verified to exist. This ditch drains property well beyond the church site itself, or an area of 590 -650 acres to the south and east of the site. It is proposed to maintain the ditch in a pipe condition and re -route it around the church site. As shown on the plan, an 18 -inch diameter RCP pipe is proposed to connect from the existing drain tile, run westerly along the south property line a distance of about 1100 feet, turn northward and flow to an existing ditch and wetland area. Hydraulic calculations must be submitted to the City for review to assure that the existing flow capacity is maintained or exceeded. Additional drainage and utility easements will also be required to provide perpetual maintenance. The drain tile running into the property further west (1200 feet west of County Road 21) is also shown connecting to the proposed 18 -inch pipe. At this location, it also appears that much of the surface water runoff from properties to the south flows into the Eagle Brook property through a natural low area or swale. The proposed grading plan appears to raise the ground level at the property line and cut off the overland drainage. It is suggested that the storm sewer and grading be designed and/or adjusted accordingly to assure that grading changes on the Eagle Brook property do not result in adverse impacts to the existing drainage pattems of neighboring properties. Again, hydraulic calculations must be submitted to assure that the existing flow capacities are maintained or exceeded. Based upon the information provided, there will be no increase in the developed rate of runoff from the site. A summary table has been provided showing that runoff rates for the 2 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -year storm events show significant decreased in the runoff rate from the site under the proposed site conditions. However, full drainage calculations must be submitted to the City to verify the summary figures provided. Best management practices (BMP's) have been incorporated into the site design to limit and control the rate of runoff, and provide storm water treatment per RCWD requirements. The information provided states that County Road 21 drainage and runoff shall be maintained in its current operative state which includes discharge through vegetated swales to existing wetland areas. However, the grading plan is not entirely clear as to where the roadway ditch drainage will flow, especially with pending turn lane improvements and widening of the roadway. It would appear from the plan that the north part of the roadway will drain to an existing wetland at the north end of the site as it currently does. The ditch at the • Eagle Brook Church Review Page 4 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota south end of the property appears to connect with the County Ditch 72 system, but the grading plan is not entirely clear. There is no filling and/or impact to existing wetlands or flood plain proposed. Existing woodlands and buffer areas adjacent to Peltier Lake are proposed to be left naturally as is. The site grading plan also proposes to incorporate effective use of stormwater retention and infiltration methods to control runoff, provide stormwater treatment, and enhance groundwater infiltration in accordance with RCWD requirements. Bioretention areas in the proposed parking lots and rain gardens are proposed in the design to assist in meeting RCWD requirements for rate control and stormwater treatment. Further construction details must be provided in the plans._ In addition, it is recommended that groundwater levels at proposed infiltration basin locations be verified to assure the effectiveness of infiltration at those locations. Phosphorus discharge from the site will be reduced from the existing site condition, based on the phosphorus load modeling provided by the engineer. The change of the property from agricultural use alone will assist in reducing phosphorus discharge levels from the site. Additional comments received regarding phosphorus are being reviewed. A permit in accordance with the requirements of the NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) in accordance with the most recently adopted requirements of the MPCA and the City of Lino Lakes shall be attained by the church, and shall be administered as required. Wastewater Treatment In accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the church is located in an area designated as rural, and the extension of sanitary sewer into this area is not anticipated in the immediate future. An on -site treatment system is therefore necessary, and shall be subject to the review and approval of Anoka County and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (M•CA). Existing septic systems must be removed and/or abandoned in accordance with local and state requirements. An on -site wastewater treatment system is proposed, based on the Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Final Design Report and Specifications for Eagle Brook Church, dated October 8, 2003, by Eco Systems Engineering, Inc. The following comments are provided: 1. The treatment system proposed exceeds requirements. However, the system submitted for approval is considered a Performance (non - standard) system. According to Minnesota Rules 7080, the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, or appropriate permitting authority must adopt Minnesota Rule 7080.0179 in order for performance systems to be allowed. It should be verified that the appropriate agency or authority has adopted this rule. 2. The proposed system consists of a standard set of septic tanks, an intermediate pretreatment unit, and a final soil disposal system. The system would be a standard system if it did not have the intermediate pretreatment. • Eagle Brook Church Review Page 5 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 3. Percolation tests were not submitted, and must be provided. 4. For a performance system the following items are also required for submittal: 1. Estimated costs for construction, operation, monitoring, service, component replacement, and management. 2. Anticipated system life. 3. Hydraulic and organic loading rates to all components of the system. The Church or the design engineer must submit the required information, and verify that Performance systems are allowed. In addition, the Church will be responsible for the long term maintenance and upkeep of the on -site treatment system. Water Supply In accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the church is located in an area designated as rural, and the extension of water into this area is not anticipated in the immediate future. An on -site new well is therefore necessary, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The DNR has stated that if appropriated water exceeds 10,000 gallons per day or one million gallons a year, a DNR permit will be required. Under the development as proposed, estimated water usage is proposed to be 2800 gallons per day with a peak usage (large events), of 4200 gallons per day. The DNR has also recommended the use of lake water to meet irrigation needs. It is likely that a deep aquifer such as the Prairie du Chien/Jordan would be utilized, and any impacts to wells on neighboring properties would be unlikely. Further details regarding the water supply distribution system will be required upon submittal of final construction plans, including design considerations for fire protection and adherence to local and State regulations as required. Plan Comments Full size and 11X17 -size Application for Conditional Use permit plan sets (14 sheets) dated October 13, 2003 have been provided. As previously stated, these plans suffice for preliminary review at this time but are considered incomplete for construction purposes. Following are some preliminary review comments: Site Plan As previously stated, at least some improvements to County Road 21 will be needed at the church site per the requirements of Hennepin County. The required improvements (turn lanes, widening, etc.) to County Road 21 are not shown adequately. The church has been in contact with Anoka County to establish appropriate access points on 20th Avenue North (County Road 21), and necessary improvements (widening and turn lanes). The plan must also show the proposed tum lanes, lengths, and other improvements as required by • Anoka County. A construction plan must also eventually be provided that includes specific design details, . Eagle Brook Church Review Page 6 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • including tapers, pavement thicknesses, provisions for traffic control and safety, etc. as required by the County. The site plan must provide the following information as well: 1. Proposed improvement areas should be labeled accordingly, including delineation of driveway and parking areas with concrete curb and gutter (B -618), rain gardens, turfed areas, and additional dimensions for the property lines and site boundaries. 2. Construction related items such as standard construction details must be provided. This would include pavement thicknesses, and references to MnDot, County, and City standard details as required. 3. References to private utilities, including Gopher State One Call must also be provided. 4. It is presumed from the plan that the existing two housing units on the property will remain and not be removed. 5. The church building's main floor and lowest floor elevations must be provided on the plan. The lake, wetland, and proposed detention basin flood elevations are critical to the elevation to be established for the building. The lowest building opening must be a minimum of 1 -foot higher than the emergency overflow elevation. Basement floor elevations must be at least 4 -feet above the normal water elevation and 2 -feet above the design flood level. Grading Plan The grading plan provides a general overall plan of how the site is proposed to be graded. Detailed plans for construction will ultimately need to be provided and include the following: 1. Standard details for specific design items such as the rain gardens, erosion and sedimentation control measures, outlet and manhole details, seeding and turf restoration, importing of material as may be needed, and pipe sizes and invert elevations. 2. Any imported topsoil, fill material, or granular materials to be used as roadway or building pad fill must be approved by the City Engineer (material and source). 3. Any notes regarding clearing of trees should be revised to include language stating that clearing and grubbing shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes and Mn/DOT 2101, and the Tree Preservation Plan as approved by the City. 4. Notes regarding seeding, mulching and turf establishment should refer to the appropriate Mn/DOT Specification for turf establishment (2575) and for the seed mixture. The City of Lino Lakes has a specific seed specification for ponding areas that the Church shall incorporate into the plans. , Eagle Brook Church Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • Page 7 November 5, 2003 5. All grading shall be confined to the property. No additional runoff from the site shall enter upon neighboring properties. If grading requires any work into the adjoining property, the Contractor shall be responsible for attaining authorization as needed. The grading and stormwater routing for the County Road 21 ditch system in relation to the property must also be shown. 6. Proposed storm sewer outlet and inlet invert elevations, and drainage structure rim elevations must be shown on the Grading Plan at all locations. Pond outlet details for each outlet area are needed, and can be provided on a Detail Sheet. 7. Easements shall be provided around all wetland and stormwater detention areas. Utility Plan The Utility Plan submitted at this time provides a general overall design for the utility system (water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). Much of the detailed information required for construction Plans has not yet been provided. However, the following general comments can be made regarding the Utility Plan at this time: 1. Profile sheets, construction notes, service locations, and other pertinent information typical of utility construction Plans shall be provided accordingly. All utility system materials and installation methods shall follow City of Lino Lakes engineering standards, and the requirements of the Standard Utilities Specifications of the City Engineers Association of Minnesota. These requirements must be specified on all Utility Plan, along with additional construction notes that include the following: a legend, provisions for private utilities, references to City of Lino Lakes requirements for utility notifications and shut- downs, traffic control and safety requirements. 2. All utility installations shall be performed in accordance with the recommendations of a geotechnical engineer. It is our understanding that a geotechnical investigation of the site has been conducted. A copy of the geotechnical investigation and report must be provided to the City. 3. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet. 4. Water pipe and appurtenances shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino lakes, and as follows: Hydrants - Waterous Pacer WB -67; Valves - Mueller A2370 -20 or equal. DIP pipe shall be Class 52. City standards must be identified on the plan or provided on a detail sheet. Well installation shall and the water distribution system shall conform to the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Health and Department of Natural Resources as applicable. 5. The Grading and Utility Plans shall include notes providing for erosion and sedimentation control. 6. All storm sewer pipes must be RC pipe. Pipe sizes, grades, and structure invert and rim elevations must be provided. • • • Eagle Brook Church Review Page 8 November 5, 2003 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Additional Comments 1. Typical street and pavement sections (pavement section and design) must be provided. All street, driveway, and parking area components shall as a minimum, meet Mn/DOT and City of Lino Lakes Engineering Standards. 2. The building will be protected by a wet pipe fire sprinkler system in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, Minnesota State Fire Code, and National Fire Protection Association Standards. Further requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, such as the number and location of hydrants shall be subject to review and approval of the City Fire Chief. 3. A 30kW generator is proposed to be installed for back -up and safety items only, such as emergency lighting, exit signs, fire alarms, security and communications systems. 4. An existing 100 foot wide utility easement (Document No. 1187297), located approximately 1300 feet west of and parallel to County Road 21 runs north -south across the entire site. Overhead power lines currently exist within the easement. The church site as proposed does not show any surface improvements within the easement area with the exception of some grading and underground sanitary and storm sewer work. A significant portion of the proposed County Ditch 72 realignment also falls within the boundaries of this easement. It is therefore recommended that the existing utility easement be reviewed to verify its extent of coverage (utilities, drainage, power lines, etc.). Expansion of the existing easement or the establishment of new easements as needed shall be required to cover the proposed storm sewer. 5. Full Drainage Calculations must be provided. Summary sheets showing storm water runoff rates for 2 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -year events have been provided, as well as pond volume calculations. However, full calculations showing all supporting data, computations, and design assumptions must be provided. 6. A wetland delineation report has been received and accepted by the RCWD. There are no impacts to wetlands proposed as part of this project. Memo To: Michael Grochalla CC: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson Date: November 4, 2003 Re: Recommendations of the October 29, 2003 Environmental Board Environmental Board Meeting Date: October 29, 2003 • Topic: Eagle Brook Church • Recommendations: Recommendation to deny Eagle Brook Church application. The recommendation to deny is based on the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for rural, or low density housing It is the belief of the Environmental Board that the church does not meet the intent of the zoning for this area. Should the application move forward for approval, than the following issues should be addressed: • The parking should be reduced to the City minimum. • A management plan (monitoring and Maintenance) should be developed for Stormwater ponds. • Address soil compaction - prevention procedures during construction. • The church should have an actual legal commitment to the proposed conservation easement (should be written now, before receiving approvals). The Conservation Easement should include the area described as a conservation area. • Require sewer hook up within two years of availability. • Work with City staff on native plantings. • Work with City staff on providing appropriate screening for neighbors, including neighbors on the Northeast parking lot. • Investigate additional methods of reducing phosphorous to the lake such as a program to sweep parking lots and roads regularly, and/or spreading water through the woodland area with leveling bars, or additional rain gardens. Recalculate • Page 1 • • • phosphorus - export; with site management techniques and other engineered modifications to surface -water treatment -train. Demonstrate the phosphorous export can equal or exceed policy 2.3 of the Surface Water Management Plan. • Develop a monitoring plan for the herons during the nesting season with a stop action component if the herons are disturbed. This plan should should also addressee noise over the life of the church. • Addressee the use of salt and snow storage areas. • Require a management plan for prairie areas. • Lighting should be turned off after hours (after the need for outside lighting). Motion: By Donlin, Second by Grundhoffer to recommend denial of the Eagle Brook Church Application based on intent of the Comprehensive Plan for this area. Topic: Circle -Lex VFW Post 6583, 7868 Lake Drive, Site Plan Review Recommendations: The Environmental Board made the following recommendations of the VFW proposal at their October 29, 2003 meeting: • Parking should be reduced to the city minimum, or the VFW should use pervious paving. • Soil - compaction protection measures should be used during construction. • Staff should confirm that the lighting plan conforms to city ordinance. • Use City seed specifications for native plant areas. • Remove existing lighted sign. • Plant Northern pin oaks instead of Summit ash • Agree to clean exhaust vents in a non - polluting manner. • Develop a maintenance plan for native plant areas and frequent parking lot sweeping. Motion: Motion by Donlin, 2nd by Grundhoffer to recommend approval with the Environmental Board recommendations. All were in favor. Motion passed. • Page 2 COUNTY OF ANOKA (763) 422-7063 City of Lino Lakes c/o Jeff Smyser, City Planner 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Mn 55014 COMMUNITY HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Anoka County Government Center 2100 3rd Ave. Room 360 Anoka, MN 55303 -2264 November 3, 2003 Re; Eagle Brook Church proposed onsite wastewater treatment system Dear Mr. Smyser Fax (763) 323 -6150 I have reviewed the final design report for the proposed sewer system and I have two concerns, relating to freezing and damage to the mounds. The sewer line from the building drain to the septic tanks is greater than 600 feet and freezing is a distinct possibility. Either the tanks should be relocated closer to the building or additional emphasis should be placed on insulating the piping. My second recommendation is the construction of a barrier around the mounds to protect them from all terrain vehicles and snowmobiles. Thank you for the opportunity to review these plans and if you have questions concerning this matter please call me at 763 -422 -7066. Scerely, on M. Christensen ublic Health Specialist cc Eco Systems Eng. Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer fnal NOV 0 5 2003 CITY OF t_ii'.•:; Li-±KES ta I R qNDEAU WAKE Atg 'TOR' S 'ERVILI-E LAKE co 51 ri4138 L5,1:17111:1:12L1=7,1114:trai. I an I lier. RAVI Mai am 6w:2 ROWAN' RI Num RtgatergIVV,AX.M11;50atb 11 Eli mia 4 Wf41 a it ' ImhousrmAL. 2—P4'811(' PROPOSED LAND USE LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Rural Low Density Sewered Residential Low Density Unsewered Resid. Industrial Low Density Sewered Residential ACP 45) U 1111 111i�� PSP _adidaNit Mire PSP Mit _ smi irjjggial sowANIP IN10101-11;• ORGE ATCH AKE t II IL ui.w`+ .: /J� NEON , f, 1. '.ri I 1im rof dl.n/. ...1\ t-J lily. �:�i�r ,�41 "AA_ .:74" Ai '114 74.1411. Vglik mum • . i61i•�C ��i1 111111111111 \���I� Cx warl\ryd Arrrrrrirrra 1.111" sill2 EAGLh BROOK CHURCH CAMPUS LINO LAKES, MIS APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROJECT TEAM OWNER EAGLE BROOK CHURCH 5212 130th Street N. White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Phone: (651) 429 -9227 Fax: (651) 429 -7663 ARCHITECT BWBR ARCHITECTS 380 St Peter Street, Suite 600 St. Paul, MN 55102 -1996 Phone: (651) 222 -3701 Fax: (651) 222 -8961 GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHEEHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 360 West Larpenteur Avenue St. Paul, MN 55113 Phone: (651) 488 -6691 Fax: (651) 488-4992 STRUCTURAL ERICKSEN ROED & ASSOCIATES 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 201 -S St. Paul, MN 55114 -1904 Phone: (651) 251 -7570 Fax: (651) 251 -7578 LANDSCAPE OSLUND AND ASSOCIATES 115 Washington Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: (612) 359 -9144 Fax: (612) 359 -9625 CIVIL SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55447 Phone: (763) 475 -0100 Fax: (763) 475 -2429 ACOUSTICS ACOUSTIC DIMENSIONS 15505 Wright Brothers Drive Addison, TX 75001 Phone: (972) 239 -1505 Fax: (972) 239 -1504 SEPTIC SYSTEMS ECO SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 333 East Main Street PO Box 388 Elk River, MN 55330 Phone: (763) 441 -7509 Fax: (763) 441 -9176 MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL ERICKSEN ELLISON & ASSOCIATES 2635 University Avenue West, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55114 -1231 Phone: (651) 632 -2300 Fax: (651) 632 -2397 SHEET INDEX 100.1 177LE MEET CIVIL/LANDSCAPE PURVEY ol0.1 SIZE FEAR 010, CRAMMy0 PLAN 0201 UTILITY PLAN n0 111 m LANDSCAPE PLAN 172E PRESERVATION P1AN PIANTWODELI20 ARCHITECTURAL 116 PIXSTPIOOIIPLAN X1 2 ( 117 SECONDPEAORPLAN 70.1 SOULE AND EAST BLDG. MENAIION R t , 111.1 NOM ANN WEST ALOOPLEVATION ELECTRICAL 10001 FLICI1CAL PITMAN RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES Eagle Brook Church LINO LAKES CAMPUS BWBR ARCHITECTS Laymen Commons 380 St. Pete: Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102-1996 651.2223701 ■ MM or* w ev wr nr:'a,um n•cn �: wcwcN r+wn M r,nrvw.,.mw wiw,bHeel Nar.e Ch. Pei Nu Ram SUP SUBMITTAL ENte 10/13/03 Nem 0010809 13, 2003 OS 2001.113.06 cnre,a KL AEet lilk TITLE SHEET 100.1 • • • lib RCEIVED OCT 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES —4— I LEV6L---"- GROIN+ HIGH WATER PROVID 0 BY D.N.R. \s, 5 89°5539• E 250.00 S 89°49•45• E 489.21 / 1 ; I I 1 I I I inn i 1 ...co i . 5 89°52' 99" E pl. 1 I 100.00 • / / —0--o- LIJ ,/ Ina- i /1 . .... / ...a i,..; ,,. vr•-• • - .- . I- 12- .6 ' z 5 89°53'39" E 150.00 .11 0 O, • 5 89°57'39" E • 249.15 N 89°5939" W 495.00 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 1- r LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 3 AND 4, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 55, LOTS 5 8, 10, 12, 13 AND 14, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 56. THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTAINS 90.1 ACRES EXCLUDING RIGHT OF WAY. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ANOKA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY OTHERS LEGEND 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT 0 1 N 89°4157" W I2596.34 0 S 89°5059" E 1517.00 33 4. N 89'5339 W 1 231.00 ....o ma I ! ivIsi I I ruo !,'5 89°53' 39" . I ; 231.00 I ! • • • EXISTING COUNTY DITCH 72 ACROSS PROPERTY UNIDENTIFIABLE WITH PROVIDED INFORMATION • / ryw,weey That tele Pel.. or., or report r. proper. lot me or under Oheot lomervIelon and that I am a M. Land SweVeYer Wider th. low. Of /0. State ot Minnesota. Fr tn.!. Name* DEAN DUSHECK Mot. 10/10/2003 Lto.y. • 16679 __ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: EAMLIE 13HOOK ICKURCK 03 •43 • • PELTIER LAKE WCTL -A DELINEATIDN BOUNDRY F r L i H:.0--! te" TI L. i.1. WETLAND\ DELINEATION BOUNDRY PROPERTY -tINE` 25' WETLAND SET -BACK 25' WETLAND SET -BACK (VOLUNTARY) SECTION QUARTER LINES , ` I ' ! • Ff nlYl 5 �I .-.41010Liiii LOW 9.* In1nn I.. II • 4` - - -o Tyr. i \‘1 • 4, , 7? ‘1. - PRDI?ERT..,LI C ' a. 11 v \ 1 ' S• 0 11 GENERAL AREA IDENTIFIED roR PRIMARY DRAIN FIELD SITE L tr- t , : !f i I 7 S 1 i -3 I 111 ` 7 i • t 1 I 4 TOTAL PARKING STALLS,- 16,0 (10 1- IANDICAP STALLS) {`TYPICAL PARKFNG STALK DFMENSIONS - 9'x18' i I I 0 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FOR FIRE 1 SUPRESSION SYSTEM, SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS FOR DE AILS I 0 STORAGE OF WASTE, GARBAGE AND RECYCLABLE& LOCATED INSIDE BUILDING, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS - I FOR DETAILS PERVIOUS AREA SURFACE - 43.1 Acres IMPERVIOUS AREA SURFACE - 11,O' Acres • • • I •••r • as e u ) 1. Ir I ' PROPERTY LINE- • a N- 18' LJ 1- LD LD w h O 0 De 3• PROPOSED COUNTY PITCH 12 REALIGNMENT RIGHT OF WAY"......— Lir IF. 4443 C6 AEI.EPn_-Ln. ➢UT• .1 ...'= 3C • ■E _<- 1 RECEIVEC OCT 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAK EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES. - CAMPUS ADDITION S BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commota 380 St Pctct Smut, Suite 600 Sint Paul, MN 51102-1996 601.222.3701 CONSULTING GROUP. INC. Suite 150 One Carlson Parkway Minneapolis. MN 55447 Tel. 763 -475 -0010 Fax. 763 -475 -2429 ,'Mer, coney Jot see plan. • eoeteslbn or report as. p.ga,.d by new walla ny drool •■••rna:en -a Out 1 an awyLcon•.o 41..599. Engineer k. Nut Mw or Ow 51.99. Ihne ILIJI1O4 C. Eshse.sur lute 115/03 rye 43929 Weed Fr, cue CUP 6J7mlttUI ®0 scale feat EK,LE BROOK CHURCH ass New 1043/03 J. GULLKSCN late Daoq.d 8y 063/C5 J TYKE5Ce4 late CWnned By 0/13/113 IU E8HEN -1UR %.t roe SITE PLAN ,w EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS ADDITION D 003 AKES1 BR WB ARCHITECTS os, Lawson Commons 380 Se Peter Soca, Suit: 600 Saint Paul, MN 551024996 651.222.3701 CONSULTING CROUP, INC. Suite 150 One Carlson Parkway Minneapolis. MN 55447 Tel. 763 -475 -0010 Fax. 763- 475 -2429 corona. report rue proper. as a wow. ,.op... Wit do-, La4ab 10. *.on.. of Ploonote. tbs.. Walls. C Eshsnaw let 10/13/03 Rot o 4C?:9 hood Fa CUP Submillai 10/6/03 ro 100 200 s feel 64GLE CHURCH Cab Green 1013,03 J. CtJLL1K5CS1 fat (r.imb ey 10,13/03 J. TYKESCN [m. fe..l• 9y 10/13/03 0 ESIER:.UR 100* LIN GRADING PLAN AFPF' ❑XIMATE APP LEC,EIID: OF DINAPY HIGH 150' WATEF' LINE ..:ET NER LL NOTES, • SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR 1 GRADIAk's - S L O T C Ah :I 1-- I A EF2 L EKE REFER TO SHEETS 0230.3 4 C230.6 FOR SPOT 100' WETLAND ELE4'ATIONS +MG ai1R:'EY CONTROL .. - MITIGATION - BUFFEF ZONE l C IXIMATE II(I ❑H \./L EL DG 101::,:' DHWL BACK Z❑' IE WETLAND 25' WETLAND DELINEATION DRY SET —BACK °li' =ET —I AI I ■ B ❑UNDRY �`�' ■ c _.��_..,�y,�,/ l� ; { 1 — RECEI RECEI T t�. OCT 1 3 CITY OF LINO PROPOSED EUILDING, SEE ARCHITECTURA.- s;;i 'PLANS FOR DE -A LS WCTL ..• DEL `/ ■ BOUNDRY 111. . �� . z..._,__,:.,:,. 25' WETLAND rte: veeere I,� w11 � EIOROLL, SEE SHEET C.4v`3 FORD TAILS S 5 � � € CV❑ NTA Ail' I.. �a a. L�. , .err■.» �` u� ; �/i!!�� h � ; i •. SILT FENCE TYPE MACHINE SLICED ' . _ � saaoRmrcusyl I - 5 il Vii, - I 4 , 11 I ��Y LCUER �\ mo 411E11 Sp� <S -• w=as: ` • ` `� � 1 _ _., ice ll�� r ,� J L aa ti a can Vir ( u - /1 + • yl �• SS E lJ :rj [ r---'' \_____. • • 7 i` ,�\ ..'( t I j� ; 1La � F\ ---- o� - .: v • wungio-'•11111P1111111...MINIM ill ti e . iii' :ET —PAC!. IL ° ,� 0 a• 8 Vei 1j. ii 1/ ii I II I. I — -- — — - --- -- ----- - - --- - -- - - - - -- — -- - - - - -- I I,.,h: = H.Ci•,-. u4 444: _ :I,9,- :.6r':I-pl:r,,:l'o. LATE. ❑CT _1. .. jiiE T :11E• =c4 .;I,I EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS ADDITION D 003 AKES1 BR WB ARCHITECTS os, Lawson Commons 380 Se Peter Soca, Suit: 600 Saint Paul, MN 551024996 651.222.3701 CONSULTING CROUP, INC. Suite 150 One Carlson Parkway Minneapolis. MN 55447 Tel. 763 -475 -0010 Fax. 763- 475 -2429 corona. report rue proper. as a wow. ,.op... Wit do-, La4ab 10. *.on.. of Ploonote. tbs.. Walls. C Eshsnaw let 10/13/03 Rot o 4C?:9 hood Fa CUP Submillai 10/6/03 ro 100 200 s feel 64GLE CHURCH Cab Green 1013,03 J. CtJLL1K5CS1 fat (r.imb ey 10,13/03 J. TYKESCN [m. fe..l• 9y 10/13/03 0 ESIER:.UR 100* LIN GRADING PLAN EAGT.R BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS ADDITION BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 5t. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102-1996 651.2223701 C«aYY,nls CONSULTING GROUP. INC. Suite 150 One Carlson Parkway Minneapolis. 115 55447 TeL 703 -475 -0010 Fax. 763 -473 -2429 GaralMostlea h.eby c.tltd Yal Y. Fan. .p. Neater. �...p. w. v+v� 4 m, Mien n.2 or to • n....." tti I.w et taw luwl Namt Alt C, EsMraw 1uh 10/13/03 R.1 a. 40929 Noma YN Nee Oae CUP 54re'tte I 10/13/03 0 100 0 .cola feet EAGLE ERCJK CHURCH Ode IC13/05 4 SILL ▪ N.SON Late Gowned By 10/13 /C3 J. 1)00t4 sew 11.:lW ey '0/13/03 W E54EN4412 Saw, tad UTILITY PLAN �.tb j • PELTIER LAKE .✓1 -,TUBE SAN! CQ' NE FUTURE WA • GONNECTI • WETLAND DELINEATION BOUNDRY PROPOSED1 25' WETLAND / WETLAND 25' WETLAND DELINEATI ❑N SET —BACK -_,r BOUNDRY ART- SEILEIk ION ROU I-ct1AIN .... J ROU ' . :::,-."--1,,.., ild y„ /'L U �, f� \ \•.II 92'92 PER ,�� • ;�-- If ! ! 44 CVO NTARY) m of -� 1 e l - • J —'-- E:t. LOWER POND �a �. • Jew e_ . o . £l yj !_'�"� ` CI 74 ii . ..fl..':. .,f) .'/ l 1/r J !Hi t aJ : _` r \ ..tw ^s•a,.,+;tt .,. •t Pe..Cwt.�- . I r. f -. N .1v n 4 ,-,..1 aLO:uc SET yr� CTPKK PANEL ci. 'j(. 1, L, • be . Mi mien. aYabn Metal eaa I gip, L Pe"......0. (J � `tea . ® / \ \\ \� \ a ` • • • � � • a ` / ` \ • ; \ � C R ----_._____. ) • • ° COhP1ECT EXIST11;4' 2• •]] -� / CONNECT TO EXISTING TILE L N if J• TILE L . �_/ 1 • \�, \ - • \... \ ao:- ---� • ❖ `D mow.• --� . • • • _ • IIIP Arlimmiiiil NOTES: PROPOS0. • SEE SHEET 230.1 FOR PIPE LOCATION INFORMATION AND STORM SEWER TABULATIONS AU COUNTY DITCH 922 REALIGNMENT 18m RCP i r i RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES IIAME: H:'. Civil '.. 017`, 444 :' =U'La' ity- plp••■ ..dv:q DATE' OCT _:ii. 200=• TINE, 2,22 PM EAGT.R BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS ADDITION BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 5t. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102-1996 651.2223701 C«aYY,nls CONSULTING GROUP. INC. Suite 150 One Carlson Parkway Minneapolis. 115 55447 TeL 703 -475 -0010 Fax. 763 -473 -2429 GaralMostlea h.eby c.tltd Yal Y. Fan. .p. Neater. �...p. w. v+v� 4 m, Mien n.2 or to • n....." tti I.w et taw luwl Namt Alt C, EsMraw 1uh 10/13/03 R.1 a. 40929 Noma YN Nee Oae CUP 54re'tte I 10/13/03 0 100 0 .cola feet EAGLE ERCJK CHURCH Ode IC13/05 4 SILL ▪ N.SON Late Gowned By 10/13 /C3 J. 1)00t4 sew 11.:lW ey '0/13/03 W E54EN4412 Saw, tad UTILITY PLAN �.tb t1,1E. 1.11, 0,,: Ms. . - FLOWS FROM TOP OF CASING O-) O4V ELEV FROM PPE SLOPE ON ELEV TO - T FLOWS COORDINATES - - °RAVAGETABULA7ION (This Sat Only) STR. OR APRON INLET SyR_ OR APRON OUTLET NEW STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION RC PPE (DESIGN 3006) PVC PIPE .. • PIPE RCARQI 3006) - RC PIPE ) PE CULVERT (DESIGN - i� ARCH C11LIV�ERTjS (DESIGN CLAY DRAIN LENGTH OF PPE INCLUDES: 800 GUIDE POSTS FOOTNOTES DESIGN (F) PAY (EIGHT CASTING ASSEMBLY (F) - LPL BEND V.VERT. H6HOR21 ELBOW (E) NO. .OEG TEE - SECT10N R•RISER TYPE EROSION SO VD TYPE B EACH . X Y 15• Q 0 ir CL II N Cl 8 2r CL B IF 10° 17 4• 44• SPAN MIN 15• Q II ir CL 0 21 01.11 24• 361 CL n CL 44• 17 POINT NO. POINT NO. FT FT FT/FT © UNF TYPE LF. APR LF. APR LF. APR L.F. APR LF. APR L.F. APR LF. !APR L.F. • L.F. /NPR LF. APR LF. APR LF. APR LF. II SPAN CL IN APR, LF. APR L.F. APR DRAIN LF. TILE APR 1 2 894 890.80 190.60 0.0080 890,50 MEMIllazaaluziam .. : ,. C OR G 3.1 Q 0-8 - • .. I 3 694.5 B8150 0.0100 890.30 .. 29 80 114 - -� 11.0 -IM.11-® 0- 5 5933 88065 0.0955 69051 .. .: :. .: L, • - . 36 42 60 140 MINIM _-_ 8 5935 590.11 050461 88945 8A 7 8927 991.15 0.0030 891.00 10 I 657.898.07 156.00914 �- � 6 007.00 657,6034 168,25116 APRON 1 1 - _ 16.0 9 994 693.9 89145 891.00 0.0030 891.00 10 i 557,995..10 0.0065 590.55 5 i 657.768.13 158,205.45 158,140.67 PLUG �� 160 ill ■ s�� - 10 11 99200 0.4000 504.00 1 687239.06 150,254.911 OONN 270 13 56800 -0.0200 518.30 14 667,632.97 168,214.04 155,204.95 .: :: 155723.69 APRON PLUG 5 1 113.11111MIMMIIMIE 180 - (A) 14 090.60 05071.; 890.36 15 19 557,547.70 .. .. 557,673.01 15 8925 690.36 59046 0.0020 890.13 18 17 192.75 58981 0.0020 669.58 16 557,706.62 155,700.71 PLUG 160 18 19275 89013 0.0020 000.13 19 55758639 155.800.05 TEE Q0 19 193.05 86913 0.00301 889.92 20 567,554.70 155,831.04 C. G, CR H 3.3 1.411 70 20 0973 08092 0.0045 809.33 21 66748680 155,85120 004020 4.0 11-11 131 9.1.5 H 1020 I 567,4892 155,66249 - - (B)()) 220 557413.0 15592331 21 8933 599.13 0.0030 589,00 22 557,37631 155.91843 664020 I 5.5 M-11 - 30 - - (C) 1021 594 059.00 68128 0.0030 689.66 24 557,375.3 IIMEZIMEEThal 557,29275 155920.01 155,410.32 MMIIMIIMIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIOIIIIIMIIIII PLUG 30.0 (D) (/) 22 23 210 24 8833 (90.51 0.0030 890.03 27 557,413.80 155075.01 C, 0, OR H 32 M-11 159 25 8925 800.12 0.0030 190.03 27 557,425.03 155,747.07 PLUG 19 20 0925 1100.30 0.0030 800.03 27 557,440.64 1555,79229 PLUG 19 27 8928 090.03 0.0030 608.92 20 557.47283 155021.34 CORD Al M-11 39 29 895 991.55 0.0045 699.95 28 557.301.77 165,427.23 PLUG (D) 29 8928 88679 0.0030 809.53 30 667.363.54 155.810.50 C OR 0 44 M-11 67 1 30 8033 409.53 00035 850.31 21 557,32582 155205.07 544010 11 M-11 67 (0) 1030 667 155802.06 (0) 31 094.25 19 0.80 0.0150 689.98 ?0 667,3865360.5 1 166,802.01 C OR O 9.7 32 893 000.25 0.0030 890.03 30 557259.10 155,915.15 PLUG 73 33 69241 0.0108 093.33 101 556275.00 156,447.20 ■7O 260 34 691.90 656,160.5 165,44105 APRON 1 360 1 102 894.03 0.0188 094.00 34 558,155.44 158,450.88 CONN _ IA) (0) 35 902.139 0.0155 901.91 104 656,254.16 136,433.85 APRON 12 1 120 C 38 092.5 68468 0.0030' 88579 37 - 657,521.73 156024.75 PLUG 80 .,. (NM 37 592.5 8825 8928 889.79 88473 889.82 0.0030 69930 0.00301 809.73 589.82 859.33 35 19 21 557,521.73 11:1:21ZEIliiii1111 557,454.86 158,024.75 155957.49 TEE C. 0, OR H 3.8 - M-11 87 23 IIIMMIIa_ 75 39 40 8923 96984 0.0030 958.79 37 55745122 16502347 PLUG p0 41 592.5 ! 58982 0.0030 989.73 38 557484.17 156,009.15 PLUG - 30 42 993 890.06 0.0030 009.93 21 567417.80 155914.98 PLUG 43 43 893 59611 0.0036 869.93 21 557,41394 15645313 PLUG 58 44 592.5 890.37 0.0030 588.92 20 657,585.91 155206.59 PLUG 150 40 08600 -0.02 585.25 49 556554.22 155,951.49 , APRON 4 1 - 49 55686 0.0100 455.89 60 5556,45720 155,957.10 DES SPEC 1 05 ■ W 50 18606 555477.6 166088.10 APRON 1 W (E) _ 51 890.50 0.0000 000.16 52 557,480.49 156006.15 APRON 89 52 09616 60030 557.400.6 156030.56 APRON .. t 11.0 (A) 53 0.0030 490.20 54 I 557.30246 165,967.02 APRON 26 1 ■■� 10.0 54 890.0 657200.2 ' 165906.20 APRON 1 11.0 (A) _ 55 480.62 0.0050 089.40 56 556972.97 186,027.70 APRON 37 1 13.0 (A) 50 61 85840 097.40 556,9461 165,794.23 APRON 1 - 153 6y (A) 0.00131 49701 56 557,406.1 155,334.73 APRON 204 t 160 59 59751 868.00 0.00261 808.90 557,1911 40 557,516.65 155,305.02 122.228a0 APRON - 32 1 1 11.0 1 1 (A) (A) ® 19 61 89690 901.65 0.0022 357.4842 155032.20 APRON 1 11.0 1 (A) 90124 03 556180.33 154,039.21 APRON 45 1 ■: 5.0 82 90134 554180.0 154,90934 APRON 1 9. 1 1 (2) NM (A)(0) 63 - 63411 0.005 887.14 64 654940.49 156,613.05 BEND ■ 193 1 .32.3" N 55 82.04 564 155,127.70 OUTLET 1 (3) 55 e892.00 0.005 19 (.10 N 337,236.15.1 7 154127.70 CONN 141 NI 60 691.16 0.005 890.78 6/ 557106.55 15503289 TEE 75 57 69579 59,090.7 165,909.28 APRON 1 89 - 692.00 0.0122 091.16 66 5557,176.52 150,01786 CONN 09 ., 04) 09 0.007 6 667,73273 166.22836 PLUG 40 70 0.003 5 557,787.51 155,15776 PLUG 40 71 0003 111113.11ZEMINEEKEll - _ _�_ 72 0.0031 0.003 © - -..7.. 557,410.14 .. 165,78516 PLUG PLUG -_ 73 101 593.33 558,273.9 156,44723 CONN 103 901.81 -1- .® '_-' DO 104 889.57 994.14 0.005 554933..00 567,865.4 155,321.00 155.310.60 m OUTLET _-_ 105 106 99100 557,445.4 156256.31 OUTLET - (-0 107 996.00 OUTLET (.1) 870914 PIPE TOTALS _ 320 _ 3 253 2 211 1 _ 328 1 100 09 - 295 - 1 1081 36 1 45 2 121 0 Si 2 12 1 7 2 290 2 460 1 260.0 9 F GENERAL NOTES: ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO END OF APRON OR END OF SAFETY APRON. OPENING AT 1.0 FOOT FROM FACE OF CURB. OPENING AND ADDITIONAL COORDINATES AT CENTER OP BASE FOR - AND SD STRUCTURES. . 1. COORDINATES AND 2. CENTER OF CASTING 3. CENTER OF CASTING DESIGN 4020 NOTES: (A) 11E LAST THREE JOINTS AT APRON END. 1180 JOINTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO PIPE CONSTRUCTION. (B) LENGTH OF PIPE INCLUDES BENDS. 115 JOINTS AT ALL BEND SECTIONS AND THREE JOINTS ON EACH SIDE OF BENDS. 1100 JOINTS AND BENDS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO PIPE CONSTUCTION. RECEIVED (C) RADIUS POINT FOR LONG RADIUS BENDS. (D) PAY HEIGHT INCLUDES AN ADDITIONAL 1 FOOT SUMP. FILL SUMP WITH MN/DOT MIX3Y43 CONCRETE (OR EQUIVALENT) CONCRETE FILL SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION. (5) SEE DRAINAGE DETAILS FOR OUTLET STRUCTURE. O C T 1 3 (F) DESIGN REFERS TO MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD PLATES. 2003 (G) SAFETY APRON. 01) CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAIN TILE PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE UNDER2502. (J) DAYLIGHT DRAIN TILE TO PROPOSED DITCH LINO 00 CONNECT TO EXISTING CULVERT. PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE UNDER 2503. CITY OF LINO LAKES (L) TOP OF CASTING GIVEN TO CENTER OF ORATE `I (M) APRON SHALL BE METAL 101AL APRON LENGTH SHALL BE 4 FEET. (N) DRAIN TILE SHALL BE PLACED AT BOTTOM OF SUBCUT AT A MINIMUM GRADE OF 038. 04' 4443'Cel.*nea 0,D DATE' /4/ 04 V. :0 TIME: 401 F" EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS ADDITION BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 St. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Pad, SL37 55102 -1996 651 7771701 C4,zullml, CONSULTING GROUP. INC. Suite 150 One Carlson Parkway Minneapolis, 114 55447 Tel. 783 -475 -0010 Fai. 783- 475 -2429 c•.unau en IW.•i hereby nc filer .•p•. pep .• Pp•p '44 by nu or condole [Oast upr. Ie ,a nd ey�• � ao t. ' .6./ :ti W . a t•a•t. rum. Waller 0. Ethaew IMe 074'03 An w, 40929 m Date CUP SulmIttai 1015'00 EAGLE BROOK 014)540'14 05, (w.n 607/3/00 J. SULLIK501 DOI. Dev,ai Ey 00113i01) J. TYKESCN los Cea■el By 6073/03 W 054�I3ue 9w1 741+ TABULATIONS PELTIER LAKE J.P.O ND: • ■ i • ♦ PROPERTY LINE salmon WETwto OF k.1•1-4Z2 EXISTING WET ANE - y▪ . yy • y l `, 1 i/ PT 4` PG y , n :C IV P. Tie PROPOSED BUILDING (G `7 .may\ ma . B r 1? -G \ w . 1TP. •P e0C1€a -tuK I I L L I I I, -I • -ma. V MI,,.a TREE 91,0400.19 MAW 0 Ew.tNataeP.,aRENAr, •rtwrtm - wEwrowwmE u*WO *fl Kaop2wM •t*WX MAU am I97.17114) - a.OwoawusnRSwwu 'i.NPtYWeaem er.0 :UM SEW aN 7101 •RAIN 0.4444044 • .N awawaRA..N..,N41MANGCRENa.D.o ,eao OaOEa M PM *AARON PA • N. .4. Lounotal.011114M4114,V.119 124:4010.0.1 MED rSU411627241T nPalY�"iKN RIR Xa - runrENa NOTES: CU, 1:44C1.40.14CV Of PIJAPJ 4440.41k1.41.4,44744114-4 ao,mulE AN o m NNw. ne raw anti 1 ALL OMOIOIw TRM. KReNNA.A,O aRM'CCOVERa WON MNEEIbW iEEE1.MW0E OW(CUP. . f. LWTNECRNN,r01p1atYIVNw WV)NOWOIK .. KECN6[NMMI. aMWNGarO.IntI1VAM NNpNa NFORWIRN. ▪ PUNT MErARNNaaaANaa NNCATOI WLLKNMtmN • AKAMTPPnia, RTNEat1OU wm Cr TWA wixri.4.1.• I . NAMPA aTE HIMDNEP ACNMEAwK.1®.iK hERHLDEEQUA Drvomwo+OTME r rum LIMO s. i4 ' EA r.im RATuE oN aw aMEASURRE. NORTH SCALE: 1•.80 -0 11 a 30 • W 12a r ' PROPERTY UNE 33Z �(I.r PLANT MATERIALS SCHEDULE / Btl] y y)� YbY..' y C - W y 1 y y \„ I ( tio FP ✓ y �\ J 35�TlP T?'° 1 .'r ��\ - 'r��' 7 • i i • • ( +[�." . .I" P,::. ; _ L... T.--"f 'i't S LINO LAKES CAMPUS ADDITION a BWBR \ ARCHITECCTTS Lawson Commons 380 St. Pan Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1996 651222.3701 CNwNN6 oslund.and.assoc. MS= 41.0.1410 111.441.7041 NAN �w.A:1.4110.1.01.14 p,a vNK.N werymu„n.,Mmn m(..w e.w.1 no".kr Nom Dot. E.1. No. loud For CUP SUBMITTAL 10▪ /• 3/2.003 SITE PUN REMEW 10/13/2003 RECEI ED OCT 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES Date o.w. 10/13/2003 YI Cream Na. Douai 2001.11301 Sled Pilo LANDSCAPING PLAN 280 PELTIER LAKE LINE OF EXISTING DEC: TREES EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE STAND TO BE PRESERVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE STAND TO BE PRESERVED . i EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE STAND TO BE PRESERVED , _j � lb.. EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE STAND ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED EAGLE BROOK CHURCH PROJECT SITE EXISTWO DECIDUOUS .�' TREE STAID TO BE - PRESERVED EXISTING WETLAND "1"..\ • • —___ s-- ��,% _ IXISTING "CONIFEROUS �'wTREE STAND D TO BE .PRESERVE - / i / t ,p-r PERIYyN6 / LEGEND; /„h .10mo. eba..amsa no uti _111MNO44111 amNNN .�, -I 0,441414,47111.0 7/1113 MOVE ESETaEEa TOM/ WIn.D, emoc,,.4 or: en W11AO CCIIOAOCtIM:.PROTECT11142E 1643 LATE.THE MAN FOR T,W.RANINC TW •Cp0911mAPn NOTES I. FlIORGTeVISTI OTAW�INO 7141 .TMOITOSe PIIe9O 7.11WM1411.1140 04111111.04 wonuam tro411. orrvaeulEFawTrwonwlE a nnrECTIA11• Iw344440. 041.40•0441. PMPemrca Wanrt2n,• a /07311.•1244104 ATM/ nE.PwrzeroNA114A.TwT NlmurnWOUIw m•4T OWL 11104/4 WOW1111NOOMWNOa MA eM E, 04 a.M•n MOLAR °MOM NORTH l SCALE 1••188' -P 0 tar 280' 2 TREE TRANSPLANTING NOTES: 13100111 40.14113•04 3011 Te i 3. 14.1., ROOT GROWN 11113.14.701470 ALL 1114,414.11331.1.313. 11117141.1043 BLENTIVI. LTNMMUON WATNWOIIMLL OCCUR COKE WE.YT'TO• PPEnENT NAM MIL WAT01110 NOLL COMMA. FOR 1144144LATEICTI• 14447/401914111.131.1.11131:134313 TO 31443 •� Cxcar w TI M.. Of 71117134631401714 F•sr0110414011414041. 1.31.04.4.71014 /OR /4-44104:147 Ofni4.1 ormola VI re CONTRACTOR 4114•13NT TOWNS= IANGGP[AM•t.1. PRIOR 7011.16 M1.OF 4.GlmmTOa[ MSS CONTRACTM•l4LMUNIALL OEM AMO O.. WU NA WAWA /441111341147110 uw 1.11x41 nurcuA11 xlouwaaau 3 O EXISTING HOUSE TO REMAIN EXISTINTREES AND TREE STAND G TO 8E PRESERVED' / - ■ PROPERTY LR'E Ca 2 8T1NG RJY OF COt1¢EROUS TREES • TO BEIPRES D Lam• • • o1. • a. • • • PROPERTI LINE • I 1 rEagle Brook Church LINO LAKES CAMPUS. ADDITION B W B R `IiCiIITECTS Lawson Commons 380 Sr. Peter Stmt, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1996 651.222.3701 C.•Jlmta oslund.and.assoc. I .:NA., a. v... •"3kS cut.... . .m IVIOF10W Ray 4/a 1...1 lord be 3- CEP SUBMITTAL 1E PUN RENEW Dab 10/13/2003 RECEIVED OCT 1 3 '003 CITY OF LINO AKES Dn. 10/13/2003 Calm. Km 2001.113.01 art lab TREE PRESERVATION PLAN sheet M. 281 • • • tfrir ter. • 10133: OA F'N 50T 50100 SOILS ARCHITECT NOM ENCOUNTERED 00050 E1 40,10:11 — war 50REDOED R+R3W000 Be01. mi. Ewalt* WL SC*RIF EDGES OF 51)3100£,- HOLE It1 TwPFD TOPSOIL (7, SINGLE -STEM DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING TYP. ^85.) NO SCALE TAO i 1303tt 00 - 00 5 5 T W TEP 5011.10000 3506TURBEO EARM OR M.. 5r b01. .x0300 OF R.0005*4L :0. *WOTN OF 50003340 1300000I.C'WG 1001,. SHREDDED 0000/1100/ 0451 5.1x1,11 •CRE•Z SWEEP 0/TN50L — TuRF — 51,000. E.:ES OF Pi:Jaw RJsL 511.010 SOIL U 0000. TAMPED 50NDi SOU. SHRUB PLANTING TYP. -r` NO SCALE RNTO.: 30.03E3 PEP CRY OF 1.00 -a1 ES SEE0 SPEC 70 uE1FRS I5-ntUer . FBEG D E: 13. 4 FALL O E0EP 00 FLAN DRAWNO FOR E'TENT5 OF PLANTING 900000..._.I1110. PG T SECTION THROUGH LANDSCAPE SCREEN BERM AND ROAD ON SOUTH 28! SCALE: ' SCALE: 1/3' • 11-0' CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING TYP. 2' NO SCALE .1.13 15307002.DWG 00000 L 0000 00UOO 1300E v1✓4 .0R 1.ElER411 WHECULE ) GROUNDCOVERS I VINES PLANTING TYP. f EAGLE e5,I051 0501E VN P 138000011 AWG PTWE, DE U PEP CSP DE DNJ W ES 114 SEED SPEC 111,0 Vr� SEE 511E_0T 230 FOR PLNIT tI0TERALS SCHEDULE 0570 . 50010: _00.0 , MULTI-STEM DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING TYP. 11.7-ES: 10)70, 1.005• VICC, AR OR 0001 •00N1TECT P SOILS AV"PEa710N ttF. — FNRL. SHREDDED X■1510.'.000 Bu: ':0104 PL.CTING SOIL ,r-- 004.0. EDGES CF F. tii „10 NOTE 1,010(0 70RSC:1 00 *1.1,10110 C' JF 5R FT 11.01,0105 (1.55 •Ra1EP 15001005© 01000.:0 3010) 100 5..I:1FLL .10)000 OR 00,00501, .ate ai00 M P : .3Td.LL NO SCALE 19507003.DWG u00 0 00 say 'iL;13,_ '100000 00000 \ '1+F PERENNIALS PLANTING TYP. NO SCALE 17500002 . DWG LINO LAKES CAMPUS ADDITION BWBR \ AECHITE Lawson Commons 390 SL Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Pau, MN 55102 -1996 651.222.3701 CamJtaeb oslund.and.assoc. . •e.R.M ea . Fn rm....i t. nrs1 m RRm M mo •'1 M x1, Roy ND. NNW 00 Lbw CUP SUBMITTAL 5110 P100 RENEW 10/13h06i RECEI OCT 13 CITY OF LINO Dab 10/13/2003 Cum. Ne 2001.11301 Onson a5*W PLANTING DETAILS 285 ED 003 AKES • • CODE SUMMARY- NEW BUILDING Imam 50159516506 CCop6110. CLASS6005CX.1 4-376,6cs 5. rauxos tr. Noes 0/ ca. ic01I ri< tc; APPuo0r.i 04M OW.. 04.111.411 2. 117E(1) (766010011 „ PRt-RESTwf REOUREYENTS 57110161 FLUENT AMC OBS) 1.410. Moot 101.•1.51 11 17 • a7107,a1 .5E6 0.% - la-anol • sra1 MUM + MATED • .11.4401 7. 770057 0107 FEET ler 6 fr.;:ELLMENS Lit A Pena; *TM. maw. 01.9 NORN FIRST FLOOR PLAN I 21 nttlIS 1.1110,VOR 1001- 71,17 Eagle Brook Church LINO LAKES CAMPUS BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 St. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102-1996 651 271 1701 I Morn, OW Inia .4 mut 1.0. ror*II,Ine Ow Nes el h. law.. 'me 5055 6, N, REFE5EN(.7 CUP SU8MRTP1. 10/13/03 I RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES Gat OC108ER 13, 2003 1.6/18. Cann. 2001.113.06 05105 1579 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 116 • • • CODE SUMMARY- NEW BUILDING WONG 000/140.T81134 I. OCCUPANCY ClASSIFCATICNICI 4-3 (CHUM,: REL41114US (11 913311 'X/ 913 1)92 OR WWI 411131., N41 NYPIJCABLE 3 TYPE(S) .2F ,444;11)5x1Km mr.a....6.6 now 1-8 3 11&* APEA lee Woad Oa MUM + nna.1111,1 4 4.4(4r 4346 51 75,N 4.64.6 44,6‘ .., .1,■oyniu,sv.a.snump + MAIM :CtIkiAii, 111.1.0{•{1....1.6 .., OW-04Z' rt1010 4 4u. MST 57,463 MAO %ONO 21,473 UNtrialtD !CON AxIX .., OW-04Z' ailiertM 5 MOW 956113 b• ant SP".0 (IstDIMIENI I0011. WM,/ V31■80 IAMOI•P wuR SECOND FLOOR PLAN FOL-IENSTNE RENJ:EvEra rai.Dioa Mart MOW II* oaf SIKVII.INK 141116 (OM TX AX34 Xxot NA Arm 40a • ftle 9400 vial, %YU VANES 7E NAOMI 'PACS • NY N O 111011,44.1....0 2FUI-F13 2 Xxxv 31144 rTo FETidelifiviita Sfit. FT. 1. • ,111.1 () (2i1F2) -- •--• -.,.... i (3) a3.5 SI FT. 1011Instolimpt (7) 9.1 ss / (.1478. 147), 565 ((a _ ,/, • -41*.) / / • •. 1 D (E) ( ET, -fr 1 Eagle Brook Church LINO LAKES CAMPUS „.03261053,21-0'• `174423.„ BWBR ARCHITECTS 4.( L.012 Commons 380 Sc Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102-1996 651117' 1701 I ON -4B:atm wo 0,.•••■ , at or *try den au,■•■•■■.an nil t orn Int.11.1■Ner 17.e 4.1 gl nal. el olow. Mtn. 14. IN644 item cu SUBIAITTM. 10/13/03 I RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES tate 27.* OCTOBER 13, 2003 US/R). (tow Na Ovukto 2001.113.06 AAA! I'M SECOND FLOOR PLAN 117 2 PCCjI V:ALL CAP TYPICAL PREF17r3HED METAL COPING 9F "1F T.'ALL PREPN.SHEC METAL 60ER._ : 'F 12K gpD8EC" rq_ a. n- BOOR V EL. 114 -0 ALUMINUM WINDOW SYSTEM, TYPICAL FLOOR EL. 1:h'i -0' E( 3 WALL CAP PCf#2 LL CAP. PI :(: 2 WALL CAP. TYPCAL I WNTINUOUS HOFI 0NTAL REVEAL, TYPICAL PCCi I. WALL CAP, TYPICAL :TAINLE_::TEE_ C FOS ^ PREFINISHED METAL FASCIA � - -- -- - ALUMMUUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM •�r� — _�_�_� —fit 1 g LW-1k" 1:11115•4= I 1.-• MOIEIMIMENIIIMilalOPM&IN 1111111011.1•31. -----11.111.1=111111111111•1111•111•11111111111 NEWT 1 511. TOP OF WA EL. 160 -0 W(9SHIP CENTER ROOFLL EL 147 -4"A. R)OF DEC___/./L EL 1:U SECOND FLOOR EL 114.-0---Br TOP OF WALLr_ SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION ALUM NUM .URTAIN —' WALL SYSTEM PAINTED IN ULATED D -TOR AND FRAME 3/32'. r-o• ESS- E101 -41 —mmimonmwomommmaimai mm'`��w_'mCS4_ ©•.r■• le Nom ■.'Willou -- ALUMINUM LLIPTAIN ALUMINUM CURTAIN — WALL SYSTEM WALL SYSTEM PREFINTSHED METAL COPYG; TYPICAL P WALL CAP, TYPICAC1: e3 WALL CAP. T1PI;AL - - °- t!- DrC' _ A 2 UAIN,M WINDOW —. PREFINISHED METAL COPING, 'AL TYPICAL PCCi2 WALL CAP, TYPICAL - --- - - -- - - --- -- . -- ALUMINUM WINDOWS YSTEM.. TYPICAL ■�MEE ALUMINUM CURTAIN 1q' SYSTEM GYS�__� ��-umso ®� �, SECOND FL�n R I= �I♦ -� .:- - - -- 1 �!!I!!i'Ii1 11 :� REFINISHES METAL ALUMINUM OLUMN - DLOR /WINDOW PREFINISHED METAL SYSTEM FASCIA PCC#3 WALL CAP, TiPI,AL — ALUMINUM WINDOW Sr:TEM, TYPICAL PCC#2 WALL CAP, TYPICAL 1• CONTINUOUS HORIZONTAL REVEAL, TYPICAL PREFINt3HED METAL FASCIA, TYPICAL PCCi1 WALL CAP. TYPICAL fi.. ■ ~ = ,,,,,,,,--`FI"■■-----=p1111M • - PREFINISHEL; METAL CUFJOF [Zr. � — EL 1sa -o ` _ MM. 1 RO)F DECK I ■1A.� ■��1U�1• i�r ■��::= --�1 _. -- -- - - -- - — DECK 7•• 0..� ■__.. ■� ■ ■_ ■ ■11 ■��'�>♦��.��— _ LL -I_OE _ingot! e. roln11•1• \ ■ ■■ ■ •11.1t✓It♦ f���.� PP FINILIIED METAL FASiW PP.EFWISI -EU METAL FASCIA PCT. #4 WALL CAP, TYPICAL - -' EHONEO STONE COURSE EL III -4 - FIRST FLOOR EL 100 0 —PCCi1 WALL CAP, TYPICAL • WCd?SHIP CENTER ROOF EL. 147 -4 FIRST EL 1 OO FLOOR -0" als91163 EAST BUILDING ELEVATION SF001 -KT _`..9 NM SEWND FLOOD, .1 1 i witilommz-1.-----:-.___ -zillion...mall Ei�� 1 �,d� _■■mow- _ ;...••._■•3_■e_a.�N ■Ii . Lg_6.: 1.M1• .-"'''...'-'''...="-". - _91• ■inilliM PCC#4 WALL CAF, TYPICAL— HONED STONE COURSE EIIWEIIlThiuiii. — ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM PCCi2 WALL CAP. TYPK'AL -- ALUrItIUt.1 WINDOW SYSTEM, TYPICAL • 1- PAINTED INSULATED HM DOOR AND FRAME F•CCi1 WALL CAP, TTP1TUL- FIRST FLOOR LCa. ir1L. G'J WY, 1 90 -0 I RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES Eagle Brook Church LINO LAKES CAMPUS BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Common. 380 5r. Peter Saar, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1996 651 777 3701 mm•e M ava 96. it th ka ed Pr Iles CUP SUBMITTAL 10/13/03 OCTOBER 13 2003 DOH /SIB mm IY.. ,:Inked 2001.11100 KL SOUTH AND EAST BLDG. ELEVATIONS 510.1 qqOF DECK PREFINISHED METAL COPING, TYPICAL A_ :SLF DECK PCC12 WALL CAP, TYPICAL 0. I0. 120 -0 ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM � S_E�CON�D FL00R PCC #4 WALL CAP, TYPICAL - 'KJ EL. 1114 -o n FIR;T FLOOR LL 100' -0 FIRST FLOOR El 16 -0 PT# WALL CAP, TYPICAL 1' O.1FITINUCNS HORIZONTAL REV 6.17. TYPICAL -• PCC #I WALL CAP, TYPICAL PCC #2 WALL CAF, T PICAL PPEFINIS1+ E METAL :061140.. TYPICAL —PC011 WALL CAP, TYPICAL -I_1!: -IR '_. it = -h1 r t1 INSULATED OVERHEAD OR PR.0 RETE N PAINTED CAST INSULATED CON HM COLUM 0006 MAD FRAME REFINISHED METAL. FASCIA, TYPICAL PAINTED MSULATED HM DOOR AND FRAME NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION PCC #1 WALL CAP, TYPICAL ,-1♦ WORSHIP CENTER ROOF - El. 147 -4 as -m,-LT - PAINTED STEEL STAIR AND RAILING PCC #2 WALL GAP, TYPCAL-. PC0. 1 WALL CAP, TYPICAL ) PREFIN:SHED METAL COPING, TYPICAL-^- as DEC!, ROOF . EL 1 2_A -Q y ROOF �'EL 1.0 -DECK U 18--` SECOND FLOOR EL 114 -0 SFIRST FLOOR EL 101:5=6"-- PCC _ WALL CAP, TIP CAL -- PAINTED INSULATED HM DOOR AND FRAME -/ PREFINISHE: ■ METAL FASCIA ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM ' —PC0#4 WALL CAP. TYPICAL . -HONED STONE COURSE -P0012 WALL CAP, TYPK.AL - A PCYg4 WALL CAP, TYPICAL HONED STONE COURSE ALUMINUM WINDOW SYSTEM, TYF'I'J PREFINIOHED METAL COPING. TYPICA PREFINIS•HED METAL FASCIA ROOF DEL �I. EL. 128.-0" V ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM ALUMINUM WINDOW SYSTEM, T0PN SECOND FLrFf _, EL 114 -0 ' Eagle Brook Church LINO LAKES CAMPUS BWBR b, ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 St.. Petoo Street., Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1996 651.222.3701 nosoltAnt RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES A..a,.Y...w I.tr. aiw., .w. Ran+ Iva Fm Ilan 6UP SUBMITTAL Rq M, 0a4 10/13/03 cp INSULATED PAINTED HM DOOR AND FRAME FIRST FLO___CEAL EL 101Y-0-4F - PAINTED INSULATED HM 0006 AND FRAME - WEST BUILDING ELEVATION - ALUMINUM WINDOW S`. STEM, T PICAL FC ::122 WALL CAP. TYPICAL ALUMILJW WINDOW /DOOR SYSTEM ALUMNA. IM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM ALUMI.`IL114 WINDOW /DOOR SYSTEM ALUMINUM WINDOW SYSTEM. TYF:.AL —% - ALUMINUM 60097IN WALL SYSTEM 004 Era. OCTOBER 13, 2003 OOH /S111 2001.11100 10. a..! ra. SOUTH AND EAST BLDG. ELEVATIONS Shrt • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM 5C Tanda Gretz November 12, 2003 Variances for property located at 6262 Otter Lake Road, to allow: 1.) A detached garage closer to the front lot line than the required 40' street setback, and 2.) a detached garage closer to the road than the principle structure Joseph Kivel ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote UPDATE ON APPLICATION This item was heard at the October 8th meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board. After discussion, it was agreed by board members and applicant that this application would be tabled pending two actions by the applicant: 1.) A full Certificate of Survey would be submitted, with complete setback information and proposed garage dimensions and setbacks. 2.) The applicant would explore the possibility of swapping land with the neighboring property owner to the north, whereby land could be acquired so that a driveway could be constructed along the northern property boundary with a garage to be place to the east of the home. The applicant has not yet submitted a full Certificate of Survey. As a result, he has asked that this application be tabled until the December 10th meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board. • • AGENDA ITEM V. D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: November 12, 2003 TOPIC: Final Plat, Pheasant Hills Preserve 13th Addition. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The original preliminary plat for Pheasant Hills Preserve was approved in 1990. The entire area included in the preliminary plat has been final platted as the first through the 11th additions. One of the lots on the preliminary plat was segmented by the final platting. Part of it is Outlot B in the 10th Addn., the other part is Outlot B in the 5th Addn. It is not clear why it was done this way, but the two pieces were one lot on the preliminary plat. This application should not be confused with the island project, for which an EAW is in process. That will continue to be called the 12`h Addition. The current final plat application proposes to recombine the two outlots into a single buildable house lot. This is consistent with the preliminary plat. Park dedication was addressed with earlier platting. No additional lots are being created that weren't part of the original approvals. The growth management lot inventory is attached. This lot will be one lot, or 0.7 %, over the 147 annual goal. No new roads or other infrastructure is proposed or needed. The stubs for water and sanitary sewer are already in place. A public trail exists on the south side of the property and will not be affected by the proposed final platting. The proposed grades of the new house lot have been examined to ensure they are consistent with surrounding properties. The utility stub locations need to be clarified. This can occur as part of the building permit review process. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plat for Pheasant Hills Preserve 13`h Addition. 2. Recommend denial of the final plat. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 Pheasant Hills Preserve 1 Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) CO J O Q M 1— O Q O i_ N N LO O N CO L0 N 0 r CO N LO T N N N LO C) 0 0 N 0 CO 0 0 N 0 n 0 0 N 0) CO CO CO CO 0 0 N CO rt (.1 co L0 r- 1.0 0 0 N N 10 1.0 103 C 0 N (00 LO() h. •CY (00 ( I- 0) 0 0 N N LO CO LO N O r 0) N N N r 148 year end 2002 L1 Z17) i..7) T (d .5 Q a. 0) 0 0) N 561 O r 0) N r N r Development Name approved prelim. plats IStoneybrook 2nd Addn (Century Farm North ( 'Ravens Hollow (minor subdivision lots (Haley Manor (10 new lots) (Crystal Cove (proposed) (Bruggeman (Lakeview Estates (2 new) 1 (proposed: (Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th total f� N O N L0 rt O LC) T 10 T CO N 'f CO 0 0) O L0 N N N 10 r CO O) LO N CO N CO N Lr) r ° 0) 10 N ° ti e O a) i a) N N Or; N r O CO CO OS N 0 u) a) U) C E a) a) L U c'j Tcs- a) 0 C c'S 0) E U) a) O a) 0 a) U 4) a) 'D 181.97 178.27 [23],r (c7 9 26 R 15 -.-' 0 1 c-?/ •i [48] 53 16] 0. .5> to 7 3 is) [14] 1. .18.83 211.91 2 [133 o 220.99 (xi r 121 -61 A I- 78. 86 A M 9. / d'ices • ... os B5- 6 1.32 1 163 0.01 21.58 D pc 6 [20] 180.71 7.4.61- 4 clo'n [1 9] 5 "CO c.br • [333 4 [i 4 60.44 13 [27] rP .05•96 55 1 V <I6 12 .00 [26] 24.93 152.54 111'45 3 1 [17] o 1 4 [28] N408 0 1 S' 7. 88 35.987 [47] 3 178.50 0 [461 [451 72;19 [29] 156-55 v-1 430 0°0 0 cr 20.04 2 - 1163 34-33 'cr 184.93 93 30.44 0 92 00 1 7•20 115 • [ 241 109.6° • (.110 2 144.0 [4] 81.51 14 2 [5] ")PS b 60.0 4,* ts3 18.06 c *co 0.1. 8 [32] 0° 25.58 00 20 c 146.0 10 mir pARK '6 ‘51.°11 Tn I :I 1591 134.87 co (\.) 2 c: [6 0] 7-- 147.09 a; /126,02 r 62] 4)) 82.47 cp 115.67 '624 243 7. =7( 101.83 4 [491 93.05 CS1 2 0 [471 105.22 371.30 " fiat Ai 0 61 tJ4 v • ' a 1 r191 2.51 1987 . g9.48 6 "Lk r ci 1 _ 13 EP 18, 000;tsq. 'N 17,700si max, °:. l 19, 60 DRAINAGE &...UTFt.I'TY / EASEMENT 0) 11 ,l 1t#, e00 r f `182 ! • '! 1`1,,30p sq.ft. N 16 , : 1. ‘C:40 j O 25;5,00 sq' .ft. eTA L. PJ.aJisIt M317 Plat tqo r \...-----Alz Iy 1 6 .a 15, 400 sq.ft. I ci) ! [h 1 \7 ` `� N1.k, 800.,sq.ft. c%)ti \.33* s•36 15, 100 sq:ft. 149 9y; . ) ;93 ;t 5 6, 500 sq.ft. 4 '-'s 14, 700 sq. ft. ) /'17,,300 sQ.ft. ' / 1.66. ' J 110., /1 2 — • r' /` b00 sq . f t . 1p0 0 1 17, 5 0 sq,ft. 483.1? 18, 400 „ sq". f t . 0cb/ 125 / c / 14 /2.400 sq`ft: • / 19,300 sq.ft. N 6. s19, 300 sq.ft; 3,� 18,80 sq.ft. T��) 00 1 10 �•Zr i O 22.20 ,sq%f t . 0 sq.'ft. 12 21.600 sq.ft.� • • 4 • • ,., . 21, 5,0 sq.ft. M € ,DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT OUTLOT B /7 J 20, 8000 ,sq.ft. /1 / fob // / / /. ,e!/Q i l� f •" U N 21,800 sq . f f . I ) ....i. .jai ii 11 Aid a /AA/ • ■AGE AND TY EASEMENT) UTLOT B h'01-) L +' R\1 994 N I v 4 52,E ,zt -colr? ON ' 1, z - .25.°39 t9 N88 °10150 "E j e) N L= I47.09 1 A =38 I8 25 J c' 20.00 126.02 -1 80 °34151 "W 01693 Imo; �o�F o 4 S80 °34'51” X41.84 Iw 1zt 3 Io I° 0 z 9 LR3).54L'-157'79 .^ 6 =23 °05'27" 4.44, oN�6\g4� s )9 „E 389.23 • L= 457.11 A'O c1:71 < rL =99.48 1 p =20 °2124" � \o •A) CO el / \\ � �\ off,. \, \9 \\; i / ke7�^� \\'\ / V '1 N81 °23'24"E 180.71 — �2q 66,� _ • ' "gO \ A.01-10a 56 —k 5 ty, ce. T.\ X70 3�?a- 5 m 0 5 r 0'0 Cat \ 15 _=...\ N \ \ ' ' _ Q 6 °16'21.. ....._ _ __\ �— 156. Lo w 30 .an No c:) S�® R,-- \93 e, L =X63: - r2 00 1- oo -l�� sQa „,% Lake 4 °43'26 — — r — — �sll2•g5 II I N N\ �°\ w . co to \ 0100 to cvl (T1 co M. d o N ,N 0 1 _ —S84 °Ave - �3 I5 uth dine is . — �_ � - 8 ' � 30 r� i • I L HILLS PREIVE 13TH ADDITION PHEASANT 2 gaa y*, 2 Sin r i x a § 5 6 fi a t g E S 2 1 6 i w • 5 To 5 Ik 2. t e m o 3 F _ � m Ea €E w ss h W W a.-. is a g ▪ n 5 5 s g g a 58 a s a 62 25 ad m It E 6 T $ .11 .' 3 :i wr 6 J 8 W 5 W A h S X oo I O j b i8 1 5 CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA Y U HOUSE STAKING / SITE PLAN FOR : Fine Homebuilding Services LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE HOME FOR Gene & Joy Beijer LEGEND ■ Denotes wood hub set p Denotes iron pipe set • Denotes iron pipe found Denotes direction of flow BENCH MARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT NEAR NE COR. OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN. ELEV = 907.08 FT. x986.5 986.5 ,- 1- f • 1/-1 / ^1 I "� / L _ / _ % / / - 1 ,11 1 (81'39.9 Y'` -`,y � - -EDGE OF WETLAND /1 1 - - I I 11/1 / F-I 4.3 Denotes existing elevation Denotes proposed elevation Denotes as -built elevation TH ADD., Anoka 13 County, Minnesota NORTH WWWME 0 30 SCALE IN FEET NOTE: THE PLAT OF PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE I2TH ADDITION IS NOT RECORDED AT THIS TIME f -1 1 1 1 I L - L - , / r r♦ r- -• r r / /-; 1.. • . 1-- 1.r I I L_ ♦/ L_ I 1 r. r ' EXIST. /'AI1 L /! L /1 . 1.5 STORY W/0 898.3 900.2 900.4 T. 889.6 0) 895.1 1 7 // 1 �a a. '01 11 z I N of, C1 O i ✓ 89 l8 L rTl 0 47. ,.n�'FX895.0 N 76% / / / 894.8 EDGE OF WOODS -, Ot � if S84°45118" CP 178.12 2 , r 1/ 1-• Y L- 903.8 904.5 902.4 900.8 04 8 TEL PED M BM 1 -1 1 / 1 L • L - / � Lit Z. MI - 1 1 I ✓ v 897.5 B%ck 1 893.7 r ∎ , r - , • r - r 1 / r - h ; 1 h - ` - I- / 1 / L L _ . v 1 / ; •897.9 1 1 1r ! /-1 L / L / . n 0.10 22.33 lc° o 8.671 0 1 2.10 ^ � r. 1 904.3 I PROPOSED to 901.51 GARAGE I L 15.5 60 4. L =1806 R= 340.00 -.633 °02'33 :3 - a_ 6.19, PROPOSED DRIVE ' N 60 904.7 h9.33 1 ,c2,l ■3G (AS N EDEO a )\ 32.0 PROPOSED tt HOUSE o901.5 2.� 111 2.0 0 h 905.0 cFNI 04.7 SAN MH RIM - 904.68 J2 QZ z a w i1 895.4,7 //895.7 / / 895.0 ,/895.2 52.33 ,r ••8 5TH/ E 896.0 BITUMINOU S PATH r- I ' I I ,/ 1 I I ' PRELIMINARY •900.0 ._o /25.52 ---J'Iq 30.50 t . n�'e"" milim...e0 • r' r. ` e i Y . 1 f 903.2 905.1 11 903.9 EXIST. GARAGE 908.3 r DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROPOSED AS BUILT VARIANCE House Type - FBWO FBWO Bsmt. Floor Elev. - 899.0 899.0 Garage Floor Elev. - 907.0 907.4 Entry Floor Elev. - 10.3 Top of Foundation - 907.7 Wolk -out Elev. - 899.0 899.0 Look -out Elev. - 902.2 • 906 :7 1 1 TEL PED 905.2 60 905.2 904.9 1 1 1 d 00 CABLE BOX TEL PED SETBACKS REQUIRED PROVIDED VARIANCE Front - 30 30.5 Side Garage - 5 5.8 House - 10 10.3 Rear - 30 85 As built informotion By shot on: PROJECT NUMBER 03 -123 I hereby certify that this survey plon or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision for building permit application and construction purposes only; that this drawing does not represent a boundary survey and the property lines shown hereon hove not been verified; thot the sanitary sewer depth or flowline (if shown) and the related house elevations are from the best Information available and must be confirmed by the contractor prior to excavation; and that I am a duly licensed land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Signed: • Reg. No.: 4t-2..2(c Dote: CI! C3 --41/1 IOUCKS ASSOCIATES Planning • Civil Engineering • Land Surveying Landscape Architecture • Environmental Archaeology 7200 woMek Loa, Suitt 300 IYaaegNk laws* 333111-2202 TU pMw 03)424- far f+13M24-2122 04 Pm. 0100 REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS I hereby certify that the proposed building floor elevation and the proposed site elevations shown on this is survey are in accordance with the grading plans approved by the City Engineer for this subdivision, unless noted as a variance above. Signed: Professional Engineer, Reg. No.: • • AGENDA ITEM 5E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz P & Z MEETING DATE: November 12, 2003 TOPIC: Variance from the required 5 -foot side yard for accessory buildings Kerry Burnham/Don Sina - Capital Homes 6750 Black Duck Drive ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Capital Homes has constructed a home at 6750 Black Duck Drive (Lot 4, Block 7, Lakes Addition No. 2). The survey submitted for the proposed construction showed a side yard setback on the accessory/garage side at 5 feet, and on the home side at 15 feet. The Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance requires the following side yard setbacks: five feet for accessory buildings and 10 -feet for principle structures. Thus, the proposed setbacks for the property were in compliance with ordinance requirements. After homes are constructed, the City requires that an "As- Built" survey be done to verify that the home has been built to specifications. The as -built survey for this property showed that the required five -foot side yard setback for the garage had not been met, being only 4.5 feet rather than the required 5 feet. For this reason, the applicant is asking for a 6 -inch variance from ordinance requirements. This report is based on the following exhibits: 1.) General Location Map. 2.) Courtesy Letter to Neighboring Property Owner. 3.) Certificate of Survey ( "as- built" construction), dated October 14, 2003. Planning & Zoning Board Capital Homes Variance — 6750 Black Duck Drive November 12, 2003 ANALYSIS Land Use & Zoning The following chart summarizes the zoning and land use of the subject property, as well as surrounding properties: Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Low Density, Sewered Residential R -1, Residential Single Family West GG " North " East Public /Semi - Public (regional park) Public /Semi- Public (regional park) South Low Density, Sewered Residential R -1, Residential Single Family Setback Requirements The garage of the subject property is no longer in compliance with City Zoning Ordinance requirements, and an "after -the- fact" variance has been requested. The variance is for six inches for the side yard setback: specifically, a variance from the required 5 feet, to the 4.5 feet the garage was actually constructed at. CONCLUSION Since the home and garage have already been constructed and there is no practical way to correct the setback, staff would recommend approval of this variance application. The neighboring property owner to the south has been notified of this variances application. OPTIONS 1.) Recommend approval of the proposed Variance. 2.) Recommend denial of the proposed Variance. 3.) Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option #1. 2 EXHIBIT # / .................. BI RCN STREET �5I a October 29, 2003 Resident/Owner 6742 Black Duck Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 EXHIBIT # Z Re: Courtesy Letter — Variance Request for 6750 Black Duck Drive Dear Lino Lakes Resident/Owner: I am just writing to make you aware of a Variance application the City has received for property adjacent to yours. Capital Homes has applied for a variance to the required the side yard setback for property located to your north, at 6750 Black Duck Drive. More specifically, the requested variance is for 6 inches, as the garage should have been setback five feet from the property line, but was mistakenly actually constructed only 4 feet, 6 inches from the property line. The City is making you aware of this variance application simply because the property is . adjacent to yours, and the garage is now sited closer to your property than what is normally allowed under the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. If you have comments to make regarding this application, you should plan to attend the November 12th meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board, to be held here at City Hall at 6:30. Please feel free to contact me at 651 -982 -2426 should you have any questions regarding this issue. Respectfully, Tanda Gretz Associate Planner 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651- 982 -2400 • Fax: 651- 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 FZ �,caRD n1)?., t tiVING DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING, P.A. 1296 Hudson Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 Survey Made For: CAPITAL HOMES Legal Description: LOT 4, BLOCK 7, LAKES ADDITION NO. 2, ANOKA COUNTY, MN. NORTH NOTE: Rear Lot Corners were not,monumented due to water. S00'14'11 "W 85.03 0 0 O p c0 00 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT (PER PLAT) 0 i DOCUMENT NO. 1715163 DRAINAGE & UTIIJTY EASEMENT n 710 .4____ 888 - - .J ., - r I �. . -15.36 1 CO9. II �� c0 0 40.0 I (.I 8 2J.- p0 * O, co 0; N. 343 i ` 1 ,aI c I ` IIII oul 1 T!, a� 24 0 ^ 31.5 , \- DRtIN'AGE & UTILITY EASEMENTI 84� _ Is 1 P A' (PER PLAT)acp.' . � — O °s,�, - J 1/2" OPEN IRON PIPE SCALE 1 inch = 20 ft. 888 N to 0 0 0o c0 25.0 Existing Split Level Walkout House 9.5 GARAGE kg N 85.00 •'"14.91 S01'33'44 "W Concrete Driveway 23 C) v 10.23 q co co -lei- - �O) \ s' 0 10.24 ••• 890.10 4.8 EXHuBi�# 3 EXISTING HOUSE �� e — ---- -_ - - - 88: BASIS OF BEARINGS: The Plat of Lakes Addition No. 2, Anoka County, Mn. STREET ADDRESS: 6750 BLACKDUCK DRIVE N O T E S 0 Denotes 5/8 inch Rebar monument set & capped RLS 23300. Denotes Iron monument found, size & type as noted. Denotes contours from spot elevations shot 9- 26 -03. x 691.48 Denotes Spot Elevation shot 9- 26 -03. Denotes Concrete Curb & Gutter. DEVELC, LENT ENGINEERING, P.A. JOB NO. 2003.140A I certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. --//1(2:bildu(:) /P–H-0 Richard C. Person Date Registered Land Surveyor Minnesota Registration No. 23300 • AGENDA ITEM V -F • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine P & Z DATE: 11/12/03 TOPIC: BACKGROUND: Resolution No. 03 -02 regarding the Modification of Development District No. 1 and Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11 The Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan specifies the southeast quadrant of 35W and Lake Drive as "the Village," a 65 -acre mixed -use area to be set aside as a commercial and civic focal point. The intent was to combine a privately owned commercial site with city -owned land to create walkable "downtown" neighborhood and to create a sense of civic identity and pride. The Comprehensive Plan establishes control of the uses of this site in order to create substantially more tax base than conventional suburban retail development, and to provide more diverse "lifecycle" housing choices not currently available in the city. The Comprehensive Plan establishes the housing density at 10 to 24 units per acre. In 1998 the city received grant money from the Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities fund to plan this area. The "Calthorpe Plan" was developed to leverage commitments the city has made — including the completed Civic Complex and future YMCA —with private development. The Calthorpe Plan also established design standards in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan objectives to provide "distinctive, consistent architectural style that promotes high quality, aesthetically pleasing commercial buildings." Hartford Group, Inc. has submitted a proposal for the development of Woods Edge (the Village) on the southeast quadrant of 35W and Lake Drive. Housing components include 450 units of lifecycle housing, including for -sale townhomes, apartments and condos over commercial, workforce and senior housing. More than 300,000 sq.ft. of commercial, including retail and office space is planned. Pedestrian sidewalks and bicycle paths, tree -lined streets, a community green and buildings sited at the sidewalk will create an interesting pedestrian environment. In September the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (EDA) authorized preparation of a modified Plan for Development District No. 1 and creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11. This is a 25 -year Redevelopment District • • • that consists of the Tagg property and the Lake Drive interchange area (see map). The city -owned land does not qualify for redevelopment and will not be included in the district. This TIF district is being established because this project has not developed solely through private efforts and will require public participation to develop in a manner consistent with the city's goals. The TIF Plan establishes a budget based on the amount of tax increment that could be generated for the duration of the district, once full build -out occurs. A TIF District provides a source of revenue that can also be used for improvements to Lake Drive and the 35W bridge. Approval of the Plan by the city it is not an approval of any amount of subsidy to the developer. The amount of subsidy will be determined as the city and developer move through the approvals process. The City Council has scheduled a public hearing for November 24, 2003. The plan has been sent to Anoka County and Forest Lake School District for review. According to statute, the city's planning review board must make a finding that the establishment of a new TIF District is consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 03 -02 finding the modification of Development District No. 1 and establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -11 to be consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan. • • • LINO LAKES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 03 -02 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-11 WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA ") has authorized preparation of a Modified Program (the "Program ") for Development District No. 1 (the "District "), and a Plan for establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-11 within the District (the "Plan "); and WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council (the "City Council ") called for a public hearing to be held at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, November 24, 2003; WHEREAS, the Program and the Plan have been submitted to the Planning and Zoning Board for its comment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134: and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board has reviewed the Program and the Plan and compared it with the City's comprehensive plan and other plans for development for the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as follows: 1. The modified Program for the District and the establishment of TIF District No. 1 -11 is found to be consistent with the plans for development of the City of Lino Lakes as a whole. 2. It is recommended that the City Council and the EDA take the action necessary to adopt the Program and the Plan. • • 1 Dated: November 12, 2003 ATTEST: Secretary Chairperson • • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 (Legacy at Woods Edge Project) Dated: November 5, 2003 (DRAFT) Prepared by: SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED 85 E. Seventh Place, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55101 -2887 (651) 223 -3000 WWW. SPRINGSTED. COM TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pages) A. Definitions 1 B. Statutory Authorization 1 C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose 1 D. Statement of Objectives 2 E. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District 2 F. Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule 3 G. Property to be Included in the TIF District 4 H. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District 4 I. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District 4 J. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing 5 K. Estimated Public Costs 6 L. Estimated Sources of Revenue 7 M. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness 7 N. Original Net Tax Capacity 8 O. Original Tax Capacity Rate 8 P. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment 9 Q. Use of Tax increment 9 R. Excess Tax Increment 10 S. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule 10 T. Limitation on Administrative Expenses 11 U. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule 11 V. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 12 W. Prior Planned Improvements 12 X. Development Agreements 12 Y. Assessment Agreements 12 Z. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan 13 AA. Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan 13 AB. Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements 14 Map of the Tax Increment Financing District EXHIBIT I Assumptions Report EXHIBIT II Projected Tax Increment Report EXHIBIT III Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report EXHIBIT IV Market Value Analysis Report EXHIBIT V City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section A Definitions The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authority" means the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority. "City" means the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota; also referred to as a "Municipality ". "City Council" means 'the City Council of the City; also referred to as the "Governing Body ". "County" means Anoka County, Minnesota. "Development District" means Municipal Development District No. 1 in the City, which is described in the corresponding Development Program. "Development Program" means the Development Program for the Development District. "Project Area" means the geographic area of the Development District. "School District" means Independent School District No. 831, Minnesota. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799, both inclusive. "TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11. "TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document). Section B Statutory Authorization The Development District Act authorizes the City and Authority, upon certain public purpose findings by the City Council, to establish and designate development districts within the City and to develop and administer development programs therefore to meet the needs and accomplish the public purposes specified in Section C. In accordance with the purposes set forth in Section 469.124 of the Development District Act, the City Council and Authority have established the Development District comprising the area described in Section E and have adopted this Development Program. The TIF Act also authorizes the Authority, with approval by the City, to establish and administer tax increment financing districts within the Development District. Eligible public costs of the Development District and TIF District may be paid for tax increments collected from the TIF District. Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose The City Council and Authority have determined that there is a need for the City to take certain actions they deem necessary in order to encourage, ensure and facilitate development and redevelopment by the private sector of underutilized, inappropriately used and unused and located within the corporate limits of the City. Such actions are necessary in order to provide additional employment opportunities for residents of the City and the surrounding area; to improve the tax base of the City, the County and the School District, thereby enabling them to SPRINGSTED Page 1 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota better provide needed public services; and to improve the general economy of the City, the County and the State. Section D Statement of Objectives The Authority seeks to achieve the following objectives through the establishment of TIF District No. 1 -11; 1. redevelop blighted areas as identified 2. provide employment and mixed housing opportunities within the community. 3. improve the tax base of Lino Lakes and the general economy of the City and State; 4. implement relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan. The Authority's specific purpose in establishing TIF District No. 1 -11 is to aid in the creation of a mixed use project consisting of lifecycle housing including townhomes, apartments, condos, and senior housing and commercial space. The project will consist of 161 owner - occupied housing units, 147 rental housing units, and approximately 153,200 square feet of commercial space. The Authority intends to use increment generated by the new developments to write down land costs and the cost of special assessments, including the interest portion, site improvements, streets, public utilities, and for public improvements to Lake Drive. Section E Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District Redevelopment districts are a type of tax increment financing district in which one or more of the following conditions exists and is reasonably distributed throughout the district: (1) parcels comprising at least 70% of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50% of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard requiring substantial renovation or clearance. A parcel is deemed "occupied" if at least 15% of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots; or other similar structures. (2) the property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities, or excessive or vacated railroad right - of -ways; or (3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as defined in section 115C.02, subdivision 15, if the tank facilities: (1) have or had a capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons; (2) are located adjacent to rail facilities; and (3) have been removed or are unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used; or (4) a qualifying disaster area, as defined in section 469.174, subdivision 10b. For districts consisting of two more noncontiguous areas, each area must individually qualify under the provisions listed above, as well as the entire area must also qualify as a whole. SPRINGSTED Page 2 • • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district in that it meets all of the criteria listed in (1) above. The supporting facts and documentation for this determination will be retained by the Authority for the life of the TIF District and are available to the public upon request. "Structurally substandard" is defined as buildings containing defects or deficiencies in structural elements, essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection (including egress), layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors. Generally, a building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to a new building, or could be modified to satisfy the existing code at a cost of less than 15% of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same size and type. A city may not find that a building is structurally substandard without an interior inspection, unless it can not gain access to the property and there exists evidence which supports the structurally substandard finding. Such evidence includes recent fire or police inspections, on- site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence. Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained. A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building if the following conditions are met: (1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as part of the district; (2) the demolition or removal of the substandard building was performed or financed by the authority, or was performed by a developer under a development agreement with the authority, the authority found by resolution before such demolition or removal occurred that the building was structurally substandard and that the authority intended to include the parcel in the TIF district, and (4) the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be adjusted upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district. (3) In the case of (4) above, the County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the parcel to be the greater of (a) the current tax capacity of the parcel, or (b) a computed tax capacity of the parcel using the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the demolition or removal occurred, and the appropriate classification rate(s) for the current year. At least 90 percent of the tax increment from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation as a redevelopment district. These costs include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of land, removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary to develop the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The allocated administrative expenses of the authority may be included in the qualifying costs. [M.S. Section 469.176, Section F Duration of the TIF District and the Three Year Rule Redevelopment districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt by the Authority of the first tax increment. Modifications of this plan (see Section Z) shall not extend these limitations. SPRINGSTED Page 3 • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota The Authority reserves the right to allow the TIF District to remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law (projected to be through the year 2031), but anticipates that the TIF District will be decertified prior to that time (see Section P). All tax increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified shall be paid to the Authority. In addition, no tax increments shall be paid to the Authority from the TIF District after three years from the date of certification unless within that time period: (1) bonds have been issued in aid of the Project Area (except revenue bonds issued pursuant to M.S. Sections 469.152 to 469.165); (2) the Authority has acquired property within the TIF District; or (3) the Authority has constructed public improvements within the TIF District. Section G Property to be Included in the TIF District The TIF District is a 50 area of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the location of the TIF District is shown in Exhibit I. The boundaries and area encompassed by the TIF District are described below: Parcel ID Number Legal Description 17- 31 -22 -12 -0002 THAT PRT OF N1/2 OF NE1 /4 OF SEC 17 T31 R22 LYG SELY OF 1 35W; EX E 920 FT THERE 17- 31 -22 -12 -0005 THE N 60 FT OF S 180 FT OF .E 100 FT OF W 1210 FT OF NW1 /4 OF NE1 /4 OF SEC 17 TWP 31 RGE 17- 31 -22 -21 -0020 THAT PRT OF E1/2 OF NW1 /4 OF SEC 17 TWP 31 RGE 22 DESC AS FOL: COM AT INTER OF ELY R/W 17- 31 -22 -21 -0021 THAT PRT OF NE1 /4 OF NW1 /4 OF SEC 17 TWP 31 RGE 22 DESC AS FOL: COM AT INTER OFC /L OF The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right -of -ways located upon or adjacent to the property described above. Section H Property to be Acquired in the TIF District The Authority may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District; however, the Authority does not anticipate acquiring any such property at this time. Section I Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District The proposed development will consist of a large mixed use project. Major components include lifecycle housing with townhomes, apartments, condos, workforce and senior housing. Also expected to be included in the project are commercial pad sites. The project will be built in phases beginning in 2004 and ending in 2010. Commercial, rental and owner - occupied SPRINGSTED Page 4 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota housing would be under construction simultaneously. Tax increment will be used to finance a portion of the redevelopment and construction costs. The project is expected to be fully constructed in 2010 and be 100% assessed and on the tax rolls as of January 2, 2011 for taxes payable in 2012. The project is proposed to be completed in phases over a 7 year period. At the time this document was prepared there were no signed construction contracts with regards to the above described development. Section J Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing In establishing the TIF District, the City makes the following findings: (1) The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district; A building condition assessment was completed by Schoell & Madson, Inc. in the fall of 2002 for the proposed site. The report found that at least 70% of the area of the District is occupied, approximately 95 %, and more than 50% of the building area is structurally substandard, approximately 100 %. (2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, and the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan; The proposed development is a mixed use project consisting of commercial, owner- occupied and rental housing in Lino Lakes. The properties in the TIF District have been dilapidated for several years, despite previous efforts by the Authority to encourage its development. The Authority has been trying since 1998 to find a suitable developer for the site. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: As noted above, the site has been blighted for many years. Without installation of the improvements needed to serve the area, the Authority has no reason to expect that significant redevelopment would occur without assistance similar to that provided in this plan. Therefore, the Authority concludes as follows: a. The city's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0, except for a small amount attributable to appreciation in land value. b. If all development which is proposed to be assisted with tax increment were to occur in the District, the total increase in market value would be approximately $72,222,325. SPRINGSTED Page 5 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (3) c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $14,092,793. (See Exhibit V) d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Authority finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $58,129,532 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the developer has represented to the Authority that it would not undertake the proposed development without the assistance of tax increment financing. Private investment will not finance these. - .development activities because of prohibitive costs. It is necessary to finance these development activities through the use of tax increment financing so that other development by private enterprise will occur within the Project Area. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above and is shown in Exhibit V. This analysis indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments. The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the TIF District is properly zoned, and the TIF Plan has been approved by the City Planning and Zoning Board and will generally compliment and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan. (4) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise. The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within the Project Area. Section K Estimated Public Costs The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax increments of the TIF District. Land /building acquisition 4,700,000 Site improvements /preparation costs 4,500,000 Installation of public utilities 2,145,000 Streets and sidewalks 3,000,000 Interest reduction payments 0 SPRINGSTED Page 6 • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Bond principal payments 0 Bond interest payments 0 Special assessments 3,800,000 Special assessment interest 2,000,000 Administrative expenses 2,921,000 Capitalized interest 2,500,000. Road improvements outside district 4,381.000 Total 29.947.000 The Authority anticipates using a portion of tax increment to repay the City for special assessments including interest at 7% and for public improvements outside the TIF District but within the project area. The Authority reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost is not increased. Section L Estimated Sources of Revenue Tax increment revenue 29,205,000. Interest on invested funds 292,000 Bond proceeds 0 Loan proceeds 0 Real estate sales 0 Special assessments 0 Rent/lease revenue 0 Grants 450.000 Total 29.947.000 The Authority anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed development through the use of a pay -as- you -go technique. As tax increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these taxes will be distributed to the developer /owner as reimbursement for public costs incurred (see Section K). The Authority reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay - as- you -go assistance, internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt, or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. The Authority also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such costs including, but not limited to, special assessments, utility revenues, federal or state funds, and investment income. Section M Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness The Authority does not anticipate issuing tax increment bonds to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District, but reserves the right to issue such bonds in an amount not to exceed $11,335,000. SPRINGSTED Page 7 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section N Original Net Tax Capacity The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For districts certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive, this value is based on the current assessment year. The Estimated Market Value of all property within the TIF District as of January 2, 2003, for taxes payable in 2004, is $880,600. Upon establishment of the TIF District, and subsequent reclassification of property, it is estimated that the original net tax capacity of the TIF District will be approximately $10,345. Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased as a result of: (1) changes in the tax - exempt status of property; (2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District; (3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or (4) changes in property classification rates. Section 0 Original Tax Capacity Rate The County Auditor shall also certify the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the original net tax capacity. In future years, the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of (a) the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or (b) the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. At the time this document was prepared, the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District, for taxes levied in 2003 and payable in 2004, was not yet available. When this total becomes available, the County Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating the tax increment generated by the TIF District, the sum of the local tax rates for taxes levied in 2002 and payable in 2003, is 116.924% as shown below. Taxing Jurisdiction 2002/2003 Local Tax Rate City of Lino Lakes 47.603% Anoka County 37.714 ISD 831 24.557% Other 7.050% Total 116.924% SPRINGSTED Page 8 • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota Section P Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. For communities affected by the fiscal disparity provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F and Chapter 276A, the original net tax capacity of the TIF District shall be determined before the application of fiscal disparity. In subsequent years, the current net tax capacity shall either (a) be determined before the application of fiscal disparity or (b) exclude the product of any fiscal disparity increase in the TIF District (since the original net tax capacity was certified) times the appropriate fiscal disparity ratio. The method the Authority elects shall remain the same for the life of the TIF District, except that a single change may be made at any time from method (a) to method (b) above. The County Auditor shall certify to the Authority the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The Authority may choose to retain any or all of this amount. It is the Authority's intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Exhibit II gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit III which shows the projected tax increment generated over the anticipated life of the TIF District. Section Q Use of Tax Increment Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36 of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and pay such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit 111 shows the projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District. The Authority has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of the following purposes: (1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative costs associated with the TIF District (see Section T); (2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; (4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S. Section 469.175, Subdivision 1 a; or return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. (3) (5) Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive SPRINGSTED Page 9 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota this requirement. Tax increments shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City. Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government or the State or federal government, or for a commons area used as a public park, or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction or renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes. If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other beneficiary of assistance, to repay all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed with tax increments, such payments shall be subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less than the cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest rate subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the developer or beneficiary. Section R Excess Tax Increment In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the Authority shall use the excess tax increments to: (1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds;. (2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof; (3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds; or (4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution. Section S Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule At least 75% of the tax increments from the TIF District must be expended on activities within the district or to pay for bonds used to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section E for additional restrictions). No more than 25% of the tax increments may be spent on costs outside of the TIF District but within the boundaries of the Project Area, except to pay debt service on credit enhanced bonds. All administrative expenses are considered to have been spent outside of the TIF District. Tax increments are considered to have been spent within the TIF District if such amounts are: (1) actually paid to a third party for activities performed within the TIF District within five years after certification of the district; (2) used to pay bonds that were issued and sold to a third party, the proceeds of which are reasonably expected on the date of issuance to be spent within the later of the five -year period or a reasonable temporary period or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund. SPRINGSTED Page 10 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (3) used to make payments or reimbursements to a third party under binding contracts for activities performed within the TIF District, which were entered into within five years after certification of the district; or (4) used to reimburse a party for payment of eligible costs (including interest) incurred within five years from certification of the district. Beginning with the sixth year following certification of the TIF District, at least 75% of the tax increments must be used to pay outstanding bonds or make contractual payments obligated within the first five years. When outstanding bonds have been defeased and sufficient money has been set aside to pay for such contractual obligations, the TIF District must be decertified. The Authority does not anticipate that tax increments will be spent outside of the TIF District (except for allowable administrative expenses); however, the Authority does reserve the right to allow for tax increment pooling from the TIF District in the future. Section T Limitation on Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the Authority other than: (1) amounts paid for the purchase of land; (2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the project; (3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the project; (4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to section 469.178; or amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in clause (1) to (3). Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan or (b) 10% of the total tax increment expenditures for the project. (5) Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The Authority must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District. SPRINGSTED Page 11 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the Authority or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the above activities, the Authority shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section V Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Exhibit IV shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The Authority believes that there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the development therein becomes part of the general tax base. Section W Prior Planned Improvements The Authority shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with a listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued. There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the TIF District. Section X Development Agreements If within a project containing a redevelopment district, more than 25% of the acreage of the property to be acquired by the Authority is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property is pledged), then prior to such acquisition, the Authority must enter into an agreement for the development of the property. Such agreement must provide recourse for the Authority should the development not be completed. The Authority anticipates entering into an agreement for development, but does not anticipate acquiring any property located within the TIF District. Section Y Assessment Agreements The Authority may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of the TIF District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate, shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located. Any modification or SPRINGSTED Page 12 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota premature termination of this agreement must first be approved by the City, County and School. District. The Authority anticipates entering into an assessment agreement. Section Z Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Project Area or the TIF District; increase in the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred; increase in the amount of capitalized interest; increase in that portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the Authority; increase in the total estimated public costs; or designation of additional property to be acquired by the Authority shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements for approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if: (1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District; and (2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the Authority agrees that the TIF District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated. The Authority must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following•the date of certification. Section AA Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the Authority shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. The Authority shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the Authority shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The Authority shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value of land and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the County Assessor review and certify this assessment agreement as reasonable. The County shall distribute to the Authority the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In . administering and implementing the TIF Plan, the following actions should occur on an annual basis: (1) prior to July 1, the. Authority shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a timely manner. (2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification of an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax rates for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be used to determine local tax rates in subsequent years. SPRINGSTED Page 13 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following: (a) the value of property that changes from tax - exempt to taxable shall be added to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The reverse shall also apply; (b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction of the TIF District; (c) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting increase or decrease in net tax capacity shall be applied proportionately to the original net tax capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The County Auditor shall notify the Authority of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section AB Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements The State Auditor shall enforce the provisions of the TIF Act and shall have full responsibility for financial and compliance auditing of the Authority's use of tax increment financing. On or before August 1 of each year, the Authority must annually submit to the State Auditor, County Auditor and to the governing body of the municipality a report which shall: (1) provide full disclosure of the sources and uses of public funds in the TIF District; (2) permit comparison and reconciliation of the accounts and financial reports; (3) permit auditing of the funds expended on behalf of the TIF District; and (4) be consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. The report shall include, among other items, the following information: (1) the original net tax capacity of the district and any subdistrict under 469.177, subdivision 1; (2) the net tax capacity for the reporting period of the district and any subdistrict; (3) the captured net tax capacity of the district; (4) any fiscal disparity deduction from the captured net tax capacity under section 469.177, subdivision 3; (5) the captured net tax capacity retained for tax increment financing under 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (1); (6) any captured net tax capacity distributed among affected taxing districts under 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (2); SPRINGSTED Page 14 • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (7) the type of district; (8) the date the municipality approved the tax increment financing plan and the date of approval of any modification of the tax increment financing plan, the approval of which requires notice, discussion, a public hearing, and findings under subdivision 4, paragraph (a); (9) the date the authority first requested certification of the original net tax capacity of the district and the date of request for certification regarding any parcel added to the district; (10) the date the county auditor first certified the original net tax capacity of the district and the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of any parcel added to the district; (11) the month and year in which the authority has received or anticipates it will receive the first increment from the district; (12) the date the district must be decertified; (13) for the reporting period and prior years of the district, the actual amount received from, at least, the following categories: (1) tax increments paid by the captured net tax capacity retained for tax increment financing under section 469.177, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (1), but excluding any excess taxes; (ii) tax increments that are interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments; (iii) tax increments that are proceeds from the sale or lease of property, tangible or intangible, purchased by the authority with tax increments; (iv) tax increments that are repayments of loans or other advances made by the authority with tax increments; (v) bond or loan proceeds; (vi) special assessments; (vii) grants; and (viii) transfers from funds not exclusively associated with the district; (14) for the reporting period and for the prior years of the district, the amount budgeted under the tax increment financing plan, and the actual amount expended for, at least, the following categories: (i) acquisition of land and buildings through condemnation or purchase; (ii) site improvements or preparation costs; (iii) installation of public utilities, parking facilities, streets, roads, sidewalks, or other similar public improvements; SPRINGSTED Page 15 City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (iv) administrative costs, including the allocated cost of the Authority; and (v) public park facilities, facilities for social, recreational, or conference purposes, or other similar public improvements; and (vi) transfers to funds not exclusively associated with the district; (15) for properties sold to developers, the total cost of the property to the Authority and the price paid by the developer; (16) the amount of any payments and the value of in -kind benefits, such as physical improvements and the use of building space, that are paid or financed with tax increments and are provided to another governmental unit other than the municipality during the reporting period; (17) the amount of any payments for activities and improvements located outside of the district that are paid for or financed with tax increments; (18) the amount of payments of principal and interest that are made during the reporting period on any non - defeased: (1) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (19) the principal amount, at the end of the reporting period, of any non - defeased: (1) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (20) the amount of principal and interest payments that are due for the current calendar year on any non - defeased: (1) general obligation tax increment financing bonds; (ii) other tax increment financing bonds; and (iii) notes and pay -as- you -go contracts; (21) if the fiscal disparities contribution under chapter 276A or 473F for the district is computed under section 469.177, subdivision 3, paragraph (a). the amount of increased property taxes imposed on other properties in the municipality that approved the tax increment financing plan as a result of the fiscal disparities contribution; (22) whether the tax increment financing plan or other governing document permits increment revenues to be expended; (1) to pay bonds, the proceeds of which were or may be expended on activities outside of the district; SPRINGSTED Page 16 • City of Lino Lakes and Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority, Minnesota (ii) for deposit into a common bond fund from which money may be expended on activities located outside of the district; or (iii) to otherwise finance activities located outside of the tax increment financing district; (23) the estimate contained in the tax increment financing plan of the cost of the project, including administrative expenses to be paid with tax increment; and (24) any additional information the state auditor may require. The Authority must also annually publish in a newspaper of general circulation in the City an annual statement for each tax increment financing district showing: (1) the original net tax capacity of the district and any subdistrict under 469.177, subdivision 1; the net tax capacity for the reporting period of the district and any subdistrict; the captured net tax capacity of the district; (4) the month and year in which the authority has received or anticipates it will receive the first increment from the district; (5) the date the district must be decertified; (6) the amount of principal and interest payments that are due for the current calendar year on any non - defeased obligations; if the fiscal disparities contribution under chapter 276A or 473F for the district is computed under section 469.177, subdivision 3, paragraph (a). the amount of increased property taxes imposed on other properties in the municipality that approved the tax increment financing plan as a result of the fiscal disparities contribution; (7) (8) the amounts of tax increment received and expended in the reporting period; (9) and any additional information the authority deems necessary. The annual statement must inform readers that additional information regarding each district may be obtained from the authority, and must explain how the additional information may be requested. The Authority must publish the annual statement for a year no later than August 15 of the next year. The authority must identify the newspaper of general circulation in the municipality to which the annual statement has been or will be submitted for publication and provide a copy of the annual statement to the county board, county auditor, the school board, the state auditor, and the governing body of the municipality on or before August 1 of the year in which the statement must be published. The reporting and disclosure requirements outlined in this section shall begin with the year the district was certified, and shall end in the year in which both the district has been decertified and all tax increments have been spent or returned to the county for redistribution. Failure to meet these requirements, as determined by the State Auditors Office, may result in suspension of distribution of tax increment. SPRINGSTED Page 17 Exhibit I Map of Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-11 • Proposed boundaries of Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-11 SPRINGSTED Page 18 Exhibit 11 Assumptions Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 The Village Project Scenario A - Fiscal disparities contribution from outside district Type of Tax Increment Financing District Maximum Duration of TIF District Redevelopment 25 years from 1st increment Projected Certification Request Date 06/01/04 Decertification Date 12/31/31 (26 Years of Increment) Base Estimated Market Value 2003/2004 $880,600 Original Net Tax Capacity $10,345 Base Estimated Market Value Increase in Estimated Market Value Total Estimated Market Value Total Net Tax Capacity Assessment/Collection Year 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 $880,600 $880,600 $880,600 $880,600 0 10,614,465 21,228,930 35,673,395 $880,600 $11,495,065 $22,109,530 $36,553,995 $10,345 $141,072 $282,144 $499,066 City of Lino Lakes 47.603% Anoka County 37.714% ISD #831 24.557% Other 7.050% Rice Creek Watershed Local Tax Capacity Rate 116.924% 2002/2003 Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District Administrative Retainage Percent (maximum = 10 %) Pooling Percent . 0.0000% 10.00% 15.00% Bonds Note (Pav -As- You -Go) Bonds Dated 06/01/04 Note Dated 06/01/04 Bond Issue @ 5.92% (NIC) $11,335,000 Note Rate 8.00% Eligible Project Costs $8,779,840 Note Amount $7,066,500 Present Value Date & Rate 06/01/04 5.00% Notes SPRINGSTED Page 19 • • W Projected Tax Increment Report C > a QC Net Rev. To O 0 O O O CD O O 0 0 u) 000 N O N u) h 0 CO 0 N. Sr CO 0) h CO h r V 0 IN Sr 0 CO V u) r O CO N n Sr h CO m Sr IN O O CO m CO O CO LO O 0 00 CO CO h m CO CO O V CO r_ h Sr N 0 (D V 0 V O (0 r V V 0 O U) - N r u) O (0 u) h O 0 t V O O N CO n m O (A O. 0 V N. CO N O) CD V m- CD V N 0 CO CO V CO O CO CD CO V N m V (f) CD CD u) O U) LO V V V Sr Sr CO CO CO CO CO CO N N N N m m N O C Z > Q Q 0 0 CD r h CO m V V Sr Sr V V V V Sr Sr V V V V V Sr V V V V O N O 0 N N 0) CO O CO CA CO CO CA CO CD CO CO CO CO CA CO CO CO CO CO CO N V O N V m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N v n r; R r; r m N O n V V V Sr Sr V V V V V V V V V V V V V Sr V N Sr CO CO CO 0) O CO 0) Cr) O 0) 0) 0) CA 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0) (o co O m g 0 O 0 O ro o 00 m Q m o cE m x n C g a) .m n co - 0z(0 U X >s 11- 3 0 N O ' L1 Z CO U 0) 7 0 C- C 'p Q • D. 111 0 0 u) 0 co «) V h N. h h h h n n h h h h 0-- 0-. 0- 0- h h h h 0 V. O 0 V CO n u) U) U) in U) (O v) U) (n u) u) O U) u) (0 U) u) u) O u) (A V V a V CO N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CSI r` (r) m V 10 N (A CD Cb m CA CA CC) C() Cb CC) C() (D (A (A CC) (C) m (C) N Sr O0 04 CD n CA CO CO CA CA oo CO (O (D m (A CA (A CO m CA CA O (O CO 0 0 0 O CO h CO O 0 0 u) u) u) O O u) O u) O u) (O O O (n O. (n O CO CD CO O U) OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CO O N CD (() (C) (n U) u) (n u) O U) U) u) U) u) U) O u) U) (n O U) U) (17 (D CV h CO u) U) u) U) u) U) u) U) (C7 U) (P) u) U) U) u) U) u) (n U) U) C+) U) (0 0 r 00000000000000000000 • O o O V h CO O N V Sr V V Sr V V Sr V V Sr V Sr V Sr V V V V Sr 0 U) V U) IN Cr) r m CO CO CO CO CO CO m CO m CO m m 0 CO CO CO CO 0 0 CO O r O O CO N U) O U) O u) O u) U) O O U) U) u) O u) (C) O U) O U) N N C) V Sr V V V V V V V V V V t V V V V V V V V 0 0 r W N N CO h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LC) 0) (0 Sr U) Q) O CA m O CO. CO CD CO CA m O0 m CO OD OO CA C0 O CA CO IN V CO V O U) U) (n U) O u7 U) U) U) O (0 O u) U) u) u) U) LO O u) N h U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O) O 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) n N CO h U) u) U). U) u) U) U1 LO U) u) U) O O U) (0 In U) U) U7 U) r m u) CA O r N N N CV N N N N CV N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V V 'Sr V V 'Cr V V V Sr V V V V Sr V V Sr V Sr V V Sr V V V V Sr 00000000000000000000000000000 O O O O O O O CO O O O CO CO O O CO O O O CO O CO O CO O O O CO O co o (D 06 CC) U) CC) u7 (D c0 (D (C (C) (D (C 10 co 00 06 (D (C) (0 (0 (0 (0 (D CD CO CO O 0 • 0 N 'V V V Sr V V V V V V V V V V V Sr V V V•7 'V V O N 0) N 0) CD CD CO CD CO CO CD CD CD CO CD CD CD CD CO (D CO CO CD CD CD CD h h h m 0 CD N N N N N N O I N N N N N C V N N N C V N N C] r CD CO V O n n n r` r` r` n r n r` n r` n r` r r` n R n r` CO IN CO 0 N 0 h n h h h n n h h h h n h n h h h n h n r N V n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000000000000 O U) u) (n (0 u) u) U) O u) (n (n U) u) u) 111 u) U) O u) in u) O (n u) O 10 .O 0 V v V V V V V V V V V 'TV V Sr sr V V V V V Sr Sr V V V V V VI CO m CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO m m (') m m m m co (0 C) CO CO m P) CO O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5 0 U) u) N V CD n CO O 0) 0) CO CA CO 0) 0) 0) CO 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Cr) 0 V V n V CO 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m 0 r 0 n Sr 0 CD CD CO CO (D (D CO CD CD CD CO (0 CD CD (D CD CO CO CO (D O 0 (\i (r) Co y r 0 0- r` r` r-. r- r; ti n (. n 0 r- 0- r r v CO 0) a) r (0 (0 m (n (A (0 m (D OD (0 CO CO (D CO O (o CO (0 (A CO r N V n 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V u) (D n 00 0) 0 r N CO V O CO h CO O O r N CO V U) (D IN CO 0) 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0\`\\ `\ \\ N N N N N N N N N N CO CO C\') • 013 03 CO 03 VI CO CO CO CO CO 01 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO VI CO 00 CO CO CO 01 CO • Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report • With Project and TIF District Project or TIF District To ' � co op m U Es C N " N- a) (O V ro C U V d0• N 0 0 °' a • 0. C7 CC as z m U Z H 0 U .0 O 0 A Decrease In 0 ro J CC X ro F- U a ro ro co • 7 O lr o C1 a a co = a) a) z N .0 0 X 0 H X 0 H Z U 0 II N x U C i•-• ro a CD Cr U Z U 0 O N (X 00 -1 ro N ~ O 0 X 9 ro crIX U -,-a) ro O I- Z 0 N U o) 0 0 0 0 O ((0 C(0 v v (o 0 . O N co co op CO O O N (O N- V N O N 00 (T CO N 0 O N O rn d' T N CD CD CD N N N O O O O op c5 cs5 0) T N 0 0 v N 0 N V co O ca c6 cd d• C7 h a) r T N City of Lino Lakes al CJ 0 U CC a) U L co C` N X N U X .% o as —_ I— as m F- U 0 O 'O .0 w O O O .. J O O .>, 0 CD M/ t). in c c*) 0 a) O U 0 0 rci co 0u) fad Ta > >+ X O U N lt O a p Ca I- 0 .0: Z o �'-o c _ 0 Z u) . c 0 N m ro 0 a` E >'c' w .0 N fa d• N 0 ro C1 "- a) N y(1) LO 0 a ca >. au 0 0 ro U 0 11 cm ai E U o y H 0 r U O crop 0 ca 0 C v a) -O 1:14a a) co 1.- cu O 0 C y VD a) a) U d 'iA 'T C a) uj Z CC CU as a) 07, O U a S7 U a y O co = N O ay CL O "TQ U 'O N ro y to c p ^ O a) as y C N 'O .0 U 0 Cn ca U a) co O 0 C L L O 0 C- 0 U c 'c O * Statement 1: Statement 2: a) a E X a) H H ro � v N SPRINGSTED Exhibit V Market Value Analysis Report City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1 -11 The Village Project Scenario A - Fiscal disparities contribution from outside district Assumptions Present Value Date P.V. Rate - Gross T.I. 06/01/04 5.00% Increase in EMV With TIF District Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment Subtotal Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF Difference $72,222,325 14,092,793 $58,129,532 0 $58,129,532 Annual Gross Tax Year Increment 1 2006 2 2007 3 2008 4 2009 5 2010 6 2011 7 2012 8 .2013 9 2014 10 2015 11 2016 12 2017 13 2018 14 2019 15 2020 16 2021 17 2022 18 2023 19 2024 20. 2025 21 2026 22 2027 23 2028 24 2029 25 2030 26 2031 152,851 317,798 571,432 825,942 1,080,453 1,170,017 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 1,259,580 $29,310,093 Present Value @ 5.00% 136,404 270,097 462,535 636,707 793,244 818,095 838,780 798,838 760,799 724,570 690,067 657,206 625,911 596,106 567,720 540,685 514,938 490,418 467,064 444,823 423,641 403,468 384,255 365,957 348,531 331,934 $14,092,793 SPRINGSTED Page 22 • AGENDA ITEM V. G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: November 12, 2003 TOPIC: Final Plat: Hailey Manor BACKGROUND The City Council approved the preliminary plat for Hailey Manor with Resolution 03 -120 on September 8, 2003. Under our revised subdivision ordinance, the final plat needs P & Z review prior to City Council approval. The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. The Metropolitan Council approved the additional MUSA. The rezoning is in effect as of October 30. Prior to City Council approval of the final plat, the City Attorney will review the title commitment and the City Engineer will prepare a development agreement. Construction plans for utilities and road work must obtain City Engineer approval in order to prepare the development agreement. Other conditions of approval must be satisfied prior to City Council approval or included in the development agreement. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plat for Hailey Manor. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 HAILEY MANOR 1 1 889°13'03"E 495.90 J -1- 60 J 8 O 8 82.50 6 8 .'4 82.50 Ei 82.50 ARLO LANE R 8 589•13'03'E 495.90 5 8 82.50 8 n 4 A 5891303 "E 82.50 8 3 8 n 495.90 82.50 8 2 8 z 83.40 1 • 7 82.50 82.50 82.50 H 8 82.50 9 8 82.50 82.50 8 1 10 82.50 82.50 8 11 .5 A 8 82.50 83.40 n 8 12 83.40 889°13'03"E 240.00 80 495.90 N89°13'03" W 240.00 N89° 13'03 "W 0 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 8, T31, R22 TYPICAL EASEMENTS: TYPICAL DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT STREET 10.00 - 5.00-- -t 10.00 5.00 0.00 } REAR LINE } BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH ADJOINING STREET LINES AND REAR LOT LINES, AND 5 FEET IN WIDTH ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. • DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT. 0 DENOTES ALL MONUMENTS REOUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTE, WHICH W1LL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT, AND SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY RLS 17765. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE NORTH LINE OF MAR DON ACRES IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF 58913'03 -E. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE • ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 40 ft SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS • • • • • AGENDA ITEM VI. A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: November 12, 2003 TOPIC: Discussion: Banners and Temporary Signs BACKGROUND As discussed at several previous meetings, there is concern about the use of temporary signage. Temporary signage includes banners, but we should consider the other types as well. We have seen an increase in these signs of late in Lino Lakes. Staff is seeking direction on how to address the issues. The goal is for the P & Z to recommend some specific requirements. Staff will take those recommendations and prepare an amendment of the sign ordinance. The next step would be a formal public hearing at the P & Z. After that, the amendment would go to the City Council for consideration. At the October meeting, the P & Z directed staff to invite business owners to the November discussion. We mailed letters to 29 businesses that are representative of the types of business that have or are likely to use temporary signage. There was no intention to exclude any businesses, but it was not practical to invite every single commercial property owner. The letter asks that the invitation be passed on to any interested business owners. The attached matrix lists some of the issues: type, size, location, and duration of temporary signage. The matrix is presented to help with the discussion. Each row presents some options for an issue. The last column summarizes the general feelings of the P & Z based on previous discussions. Each "option" column is not intended to form a related set of requirements —we can mix up options from the different columns, or create new ones. P & Z discussion should be restriction /regulation anything not permanently affixed - banners should be attached to building -but what about other temporary signage? 1 month each time, with limit on number of times per year M Z O P 0 NO LIMIT /RESTRICTION NO LIMIT /RESTRICTION = I— 0 2 J— OPTION 2 ANYTHING NOT QUALIFYING AS A WALL, GROUND, OR PYLON SIGN ONLY ATTACHED TO A "PERMANENT" STRUCTURE MUST CONFORM TO, OR BE INCLUDED IN, EXISTING LIMITS FOR BUSINESS (OR INSTITUTIONAL) SIGNAGE MUST MEET EXISTING LIMITS FOR PORTABLE SIGNS * OPTION 1 NO RESTRICTIONS ANYTHING NOT "PERMANENTLY AFFIXED" TO THE BUILDING OR GROUND ONLY ATTACHED TO BUILDING 32 SQ. FT. NO LIMIT /RESTRICTION w m cn u) ALLOWABLE TEMPORARY SIGNAGE should they be allowed? DEFINITION OF TEMPORARY SIGNAGE ALLOWABLE LOCATION ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWABLE TIME LIMIT • • October 22, 2003 Dear Business Owner: The City of Lino Lakes is examining its sign ordinance regarding temporary signage. This stems from concern over the appearance and excessive use of temporary signs. Several business owners have requested that they be allowed to use temporary signage more than is allowed by the current ordinance Temporary signage includes all signs that are not permanently constructed such as banners, cardboard ground signs, and other such signs. The Planning & Zoning Board will be discussing the issue at its next meeting on November 12, 2003. The Board invites business owners to the meeting with the goal of hearing their perspective on the use of temporary signs. This will be an informal discussion. This will not be a formal public hearing and no formal action will be taken. The discussion likely will lead to the preparation of a draft amendment to the sign ordinance. A formal public hearing will be conducted once a draft is prepared. After a public hearing, the ordinance amendment would be considered by the City Council. The schedule for this has not yet been determined. This invitation is being sent to businesses we believe are representative of the types of business that have or are likely to use temporary signage. There is no intention to exclude any businesses. If you know of another business owner who may be interested, please feel free to pass on this invitation. Please feel free to call with any questions at (651)982 -2425. Sincerely, • Jeff Smyser City Planner 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 • Fax: 651- 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 -982 -2410 N O. •cf c} Ch V CO t) vt CO 'c7' co d V CO V• O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CC) O O O O O O O L O O O O O O LO O O O O O O O O O O O O u) LO O O O a) Cn CO V) N U) U) (I) to U) U) U) to Cn U) to Cn U) V) V) Cn N Cn co co co Cn CI) U) 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y J •y Y Y Y Y w J J J J CO J J J J CO CO J J CO J CO CO CO CO CO CO J J CO CO J J CO 0 U J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C cc C c C C C cc C C C C C c C C C C J J J J J J J J _) J J J :J J J J U L- C9 a) O 7 CA O m O a) c0 5 -0 "O O a) C7 O O O (n a) O a) a) a. CC 7 0 O :� w ai 7 > CC CL a) a) . >_ a) a) a) CC '0 L c c > > ` c ` •` = c c .> .> " w > > > > > > > ❑❑ co Po<>00 a)❑ ❑Q O y 0)000❑❑❑ Uc)CK ❑❑❑❑ a) a) s _ Y Y J .0 Y •C O O ) O -0 -0 J Y N O a) a) O 2 a) O a) a) co V) J J J O= N 0- J Z a Q 0- 0 0 (0 f0 — O O N N O j 0 t0 (0 N J N Q == J J.> 0- J J => J O- J J N r �-- r O r Q O) r V _0 C7 C7 CO O O 01 et e- CO 0 CA 0 0 e-- CO I` V 0) CD 0 0 0 N- 0 0~7 O CO _0 O ti 0) Cb •zt O O CO •-• N CO O CO O O CO ti 4 N c- O O O O CA Ch Cj) 0) < ti CO CO I`■ O I- N CO N� r- I` Co CO N- ti r- N CO CO N- CO CO N— ti ti N- o) N C C OS U .. U co C1) -Y CO C 0) "0 U C = C ` co — C.) m U Y Y 00 O .... CU CU U J � a) co a) C 06 CL m "O cD C x 7 CO CU J C7 _v) a) U N LL Y 7 Z c c a) W U fn C%1 "' c c CO c --I a- m 0 a) a) O E L a) Cn `� Y .0 c0 LO c vOi c O .� c 0- Q CO c 3 0- a) a) c cn w CV .` UF- CJCi -� °) z.Q-1> co Y c 0 0= c Co -c cti E m rn ..§.L. o Z'�'a) )m i J u)) o))JJ of cnY.... 3 3 ~m ) 0 w°= i; ni °c ¢<Ecial i500Owu �JJ_2 Oxcu)c F— D> 7868 Lake Drive 0 a) a) a) a) a) a) C1) a) a) a) t1) a) a) a) a) a) a) 0 O O O O O O O O a) a) C C C C C c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to U) Cn 0 0 CO U) to CO CO U) U) V) U) (i) U) U) (/) U) CO Cn V) En CO 0 Cn Cn U) (0 U) U) V) U) 0 U) Cn U) 0 U) N CO V) U) CO U) N CO U) Cn Cn U) CO U) U) Cn V) U) U) 0 0 0 0 0 (1) C) a) a) CU a) a) a) a) a) a) a) 0 0 (1) C) O a) N Cv Cv CV 0 N a) C c c C C C C C C C C C C C C c C C C C c C C C c c C C C co 7 7 7 = 7 = 7 7 7 7 777777777=777777777 Z m M CO M m M CO M m m M m CO m M M m M M Cn CO CO m m CD CO m m m