Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/14/2004 P&Z Packet
• • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, July 14, 2004 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 9, 2004 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. Introduce Paul Bengtson, Associate Planner B. Final Plat, Elm St. Estates (formerly known as Lakeview Estates), Gerald Schultz, SE corner of Elm St. and Lakeview Dr. — Jeff Smyser C. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development/ Preliminary Plat for Marshan Townhomes 2 °d Addition, a 23 -unit medium density residential development, NE corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane — Jeff Smyser D. Variance to side yard setback, 6396 Langer Lane, Bacchus Homes — Paul Bengtson VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Temporary Signage, review of special meeting — Jeff Smyser B. 2004/2005 City Council Goals — Michael Grochala C. Proposed Schwan's relocation — Michael Grochala VII. ADJOURN • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT . STAFF PRESENT June 9, 2004 6:46 P.M. 9:14 P.M. Hyden, Lane, Pogalz, Rafferty, Root, Schaps, and Tralle. None. Jeff Smyser and James Studenski (arrived at 7:42 P.m.) I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:46 p.m., June 9, 2004. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Schaps noted they would be taking the action items in the following order: B, C, A. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MAY 12, 2004 Mr. Tralle made a MOTION approve the May 12, 2004 Minutes and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 -0 -1 (Ms. Lane abstained). IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared open mike open at 6:49 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:50 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING, for Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development/Preliminary Plat for Marshan Townhomes 2 "d Addition, a 23 -unit DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 2 medium density residential development, NE corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane Chair Schaps opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. Staff stated applicant had submitted a request for a conditional use permit for a residential planned unit development (PUD), and development stage plan (preliminary plat). The subject site is four acres of property at the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane, adjacent to the existing Marshan Lake Condominiums. A PUD is required for multi- family development in a shoreland area. The applicant withdrew a previous application, so this is considered a new application. No rezoning or comprehensive plan amendment is needed or requested. The site was rezoned to R -3 earlier this year, making it consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff reviewed their analysis and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County to total 60 feet from centerline for Lake Drive (CSAH 23). 2. Right of access shall be dedicated to Anoka County along CSAH 23 on the final plat. 3. A new landscaping plan shall be submitted with the following changes three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application: - change black ash to green ash or a native oak species - change Austrian pine to red or white spruce - change Colorado spruce to white spruce - change autumn applause to northern pin oak -three spruce at the Aqua Lane corner shall be moved east at least 20 feet 4. Exterior building materials must be submitted three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application. 5. The project must obtain approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to City Council consideration of the application. 6. The City Engineer's comments in the June 4, 2004 memo must be met to his satisfaction. 7. Park dedication be paid. 8. All existing buildings be removed. 9. Septic systems removed and wells capped. 10. Guest parking be installed. Mr. Pogalz asked if both the buildings located on the property would be removed. Mr. Smsyer replied all structures on site would be removed. Mr. Pogalz asked if wells and septic systems would also be removed. Mr. Smyser replied they would be required to be removed and he would add this as a condition of approval. Mr. Pogalz stated there was no guest parking shown and with the narrow road, he believed guest parking should be required. He recommended expanding the roads to 28 feet, or at a minimum guest parking being added. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 3 Mr. Pogalz stated he would like units 1 -4 be a stub street. He suggested the fourth stub street north that was currently in the townhomes that were built would need to slightly skewed to the northeast as the stub street for unit 27. Mr. Smyser replied in an Urban PUD, there was a minimum 50 percent open space and they had just barely enough. He stated if they could not meet those requirement, they might end up losing a unit. Mr. Root agreed they needed guest parking. He requested staff check with the Fire Department and/or Police Department regarding emergency access with the narrow street. Chair Schaps invited applicant to make comment. Chair Schaps asked if applicant agreed to all of the conditions. Ron Fuchs, representative of Hokanson Development, stated they would like further discussion on the park dedication. He stated the Environmental Review Board had requested excess parking areas be removed. He noted there were four parking spaces for each dwelling unit, two inside the garage and two outside the garage. • Chair Schaps stated four parking spaces per unit was not enough. • Mr. Fuchs stated they could evaluate the site where additional spaces could be provided. Chair Schaps stated guest parking was a necessity and he could not recommend approval if it was not provided. Mr. Tralle asked what was the color of the siding on the building. Mr. Fuchs replied it was a taupe color. He reviewed the remaining color scheme for the Board. Mr. Tralle asked if all 23 units would look the same. Mr. Fuchs replied they would. Mr. Tralle stated the same color units would not be acceptable. He recommended at least four different color variations. Mr. Fuchs replied they would take that under advisement and confer with the developer. Mr. Pogalz stated if they went with the same color, it would make sense to go with yellow and green to match the existing area. Mr. Rafferty stated the plan had improved dramatically, but he was concerned about the consistency of the colors. He stated guest parking was a must and impervious surface was a problem and if necessary, they might need to eliminate a unit. He stated he was in favor of rotating 1 and 2. Mr. Root agreed the guest parking was essential. Mr. Fuchs replied they will look into this with staff as well as review the color schemes, but requested a recommendation be forwarded to the City Council regarding this project. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 4 Chair Schaps added condition number 11 to read use of a four -color scheme variation in the exterior. Mr. Pogalz noted applicant would not be able to build for a minimum of six months and asked if this would be tabled to their next meeting, how would this impact them. Mr. Fuchs replied it came down to time and money and by delaying it it ultimately delayed the decision. He offered to review all of the conditions with staff and work with them. He indicated by working with staff it would save time. Chair Schaps noted he did not see they were going to lose much by continuing this for one month. Roger Hokanson, developer, stated they could not lose any more units and if they could not redesign it in anyway, he could not develop this. He stated they could not keep spending money on this. He stated he was hoping to get a lot more units when the land was purchased and now that the City had restricted development, they needed the units they were proposing. He stated changing the colors of the buildings were not an issue, but by adding more blacktop he did not think the development would work. He stated if guest parking was held against them, they could not meet the requirements. Mr. Smyser replied he understood it was the Board's opinion that as long as they could add guest parking, they could play with the impervious surface numbers. He stated from a time standpoint, the probably of going to the City Council with a positive recommendation was the important issue. He noted by adding guest parking, did not necessarily mean losing a unit. However, he was comfortable with this being tabled for one month also. Mr. Rafferty stated he did not think it would cost Mr. Hokanson that much money to have this tabled for one month. He noted there was nothing lost or gained by flipping 13, 14 and 15 to the opposite side of the street and by shifting 20 and 21 down would impact this development either. Mr. Hokanson noted the outside units were the most profitable and sold the best. Mr. Rafferty stated there were ways to work with this without eliminating a unit and stated they would have a much better situation at Council if this was continued for one month to work on the Board's suggestions. He stated the refinements requested would assist Council in their decision. Mr. Hokanson stated if he agreed with Mr. Rafferty's suggestions and worked with staff, could this be approved tonight. Mr. Rafferty replied he believed Mr. Hokanson's verbal word was good, but it was the Board's preference to see things in writing. Mr. Hokanson stated if they redrew it per the Board's suggestion and worked with staff on it, why did they have to wait for the next meeting. Chair Schaps stated years ago, that would have been the procedure, but now the Board wanted to see the revised plans. Mr. Tralle stated he was not willing to give the plan a "rubber stamp" and he wanted to see the plan again at next month's meeting. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 5 Chair Schaps noted the Board was willing to work on the open space requirement if guest parking was accommodated for and he suggested he accept the offer of tabling this to next month's meeting to address the concerns brought up at tonight's meeting. Mr. Hokanson stated he would agree to the tabling. He pointed out that the park fees had been previously paid. Chair Schaps stated they would need to work out park fees with staff. Mr. Pogalz noted four parking spots per home was true in theory, but people also needed their garage for storage, so more than likely, there would not be four spots available for parking. He suggested they remove units 22 and 23 from the existing location, going over to units 1, 2, 3 and 4 and create a separate stub street creating their own area and creating either 3 -two home units or 2 -three home units. He noted this might cost more in asphalt, but what they were saving on the long driveways and the utility cost would also be less. He noted new open space would be created at the southwest corner and additional green space would be created around units 5, 6, 7, and 8. Mr. Hokanson replied by following Mr. Pogalz suggestion, they would lose a lot of existing trees. Mr. Pogalz replied he believed they might lose a couple of trees and asked them to look at this proposal. Jim Crawford, President of Marshan Lake Townhomes, stated he had reviewed and plan. He stated the townhomes that were along Aqua Lane had the rear building facing the street. He stated this plan would not fit into the existing area because their development had the front of their buildings facing Aqua Lane. He noted he did not know if this was a concern, but believed it would look out of place and it would disrupt the continuity of the area. He asked if the volume of the water coming off of this development would have an impact on their pond. He requested this be looked at. Mr. Studenski replied this was incorporated into the development and this would not be a problem. Mr. Crawford expressed concern about this development parking in their existing guest parking. He stated extra parking was critical in a townhome association. Mr. Root asked if he had the opportunity to review the landscaping plan. Mr. Crawford replied he had not seen the landscaping plan. Mr. Root pointed out that there would be landscaping along the back of this development facing the street and suggested he look at these plans. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to recommend tabling this issue and continue the public hearing to the July 14, 2004 meeting and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6- 0. B. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, for a Rezoning (from R, Rural to R -1X, Single Family Executive) and Preliminary Plat, as well as MUSA Reserve Allocation, for Junes Addition, located at 599 — 62°' Street DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 6 Chair Schaps reopened the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. • Dick Thompson, planner for developer, stated applicant is proposing to create three lots from 6.18 acres located north of 62nd Street and west of West Shadow Lake Drive in Lino Lakes. The property currently has a home and barn located on proposed Lot 3. Mr. Junes' property is zoned as Rural and he proposes the property be zoned Residential Exclusive (R -1X). Mr. Junes is requesting that sewer and water be supplied to the proposed Lots 1 and 2. Mr. Thompson noted the creation of these lots involves the disturbance of approximately 9,771 square feet of wetland. Mr. Junes has proposed to fill the wetland and relocate the wetland to the rear portion of Lot 3, where the existing barn is located. The application has sent this permit request to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The RCWD initially denied the request for permit based on Minnesota Rules 8420.0548. However, the applicant has since been directed by the RCWD to apply for sequencing flexibility under WACA, which would allow him to relocate the wetland. Staff reviewed their analysis and the engineering recommendations as follows: 1. The Developer is to be aware that the City of Lino Lakes is currently reconstructing 62nd Street. Prior to final approval of the Site Plans, the Grading Plan must show the changes that the street project will cause to each of the proposed three lots. 2. Prior to final City approval of the Site and Grading Plans, the Plans need to show that Lino Lakes City Engineering Standards are being followed. That is, a detail Site and Grading Plan will need to be submitted before final approval is given. 3. Approval of the preliminary plat will be contingent upon the review and consequent approval of the City Engineer. Drainage and utility easements along property lines will be required. Easements over designated wetlands will also be required. 4. Copies to the City of the Rice Creek Watershed District permit approval process. 5. The homes to be constructed must follow City of Lino Lakes design flood elevations. For this location, the design 100 -year flood elevation to be used is 894.2. The emergency overflow elevation to be used is 895.3. Thus, City requirements are as follows: low floor/basement elevation must be two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevations, low floor /basement must be one (1) foot above the emergency overflow elevation and the low floor/basement elevation must be four (4) feet above the groundwater or normal ponding elevation. Staff recommended approval of the rezoning from Rural to Residential Executive (R -1X), MUSA capacity be allocated for this parcel, the project shall not be final platted until 2005 to comply with the City's growth management policy, and the preliminary plat be approved subject to the following conditions: DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 7 1. Issuance of the sequencing permit by the RCWD, based on Application No. 03 -090. 2. That relocating the wetland will not adversely affect neighboring properties. 3. That location of proposed driveways be shown. 4. That appropriate park fees are provided. 5. That the City Engineer's recommendations be included in these recommendations. Chair Schaps invited applicant to make comment. Chair Schaps questioned if the Rice Creek Watershed would be approving this and asked if they were approving this too soon. He noted this was a big leap to assume this was going to be approved. Mr. Rafferty asked if this would not be presented until 2005. Mr. Smyser replied that was correct. Mr. Root stated there were a lot of conditions and he believed it put a lot of burdens on the staff to make sure the contingencies were complied with and he believed this was something they should be dealing with. Mr. Pogalz asked if the original request was denied as presented. Mr. Thompson replied that was correct. Mr. Pogalz stated it was his understanding applicant was now proceeding with the Rice Creek Watershed District's suggestions. Mr. Thompson replied he believed that was accurate. Mr. Pogalz asked if this was a good time for the applicant to get a stub now to the utilities. Mr. Thompson replied with the road repair taking place now, this was an appropriate time to obtain a stub. Mr. Pogalz stated he did not want to miss the applicant's to have the opportunity to put in a stub at this time and end up tearing up a newly constructed road in the next couple of year. Tim Macki, applicant's engineer and surveyor, stated they never got denied from the Rice Creek Watershed District initially. He stated they were in discussion with Carl Hammers, which pushed their plans back, and this was tabled by the District pending receipt by the various information they required. Chair Schaps asked where would they be a month from now with respect to Rice Creek Watershed District. Mr. Macki replied he anticipated they would have their permit. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 8 Mr. Thompson clarified the Rice Creek Watershed District's initial decision. Mr. Smyser noted it appeared they did get initial approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. Chair Schaps noted it appeared that items 3A and B had now been satisfied. Marvin Emily, 590 62nd Street, stated he was opposed to the filling in wetlands, but he was not opposed to his neighbors building on their property. He stated they needed to take care of the drainage problems before they take any more wetlands. Chair Schaps noted this had been approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District and this Board were not engineering experts and had to rely on the experts who are saying this would not create any additional drainage problems. Wayne Junes, applicant, presented some photographs to the Board as to what would be removed. He stated he did not believe there would be a drainage issue. Mr. Tralle asked if he was sure there was going to be culverts there. Mr. Junes stated he believed the road development would need to put in culverts. Mr. Smyser replied he did not have the engineering drawings before him, but the street standards was that you could not make water flow off your property to another property and these things were taken into account as the Engineer's reviewed the project. Mr. Rafferty asked where the drainage ditch was located. Mr. Junes pointed out on the map where the ditch was going. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Rafferty asked for clarification on items 3A and 3B. Chair Schaps replied the Rice Creek Watershed District had issued a Cap Roc, which was a preliminary approval and there was no need to table this, but it would still remain a condition. Mr. Root asked if the remaining conditions, except for A and B, were not too burdensome on staff that they get completed prior to this going to Council. Mr. Smyser replied most of the conditions were standard conditions, which would not additional burden to staff's time. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to recommend rezoning from Rural to Residential Executive (R -1X) approval and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 -0. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to recommend that MUSA capacity be allocated for this parcel and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 -0. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 9 Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to recommend the preliminary plat be approved subject to the conditions as noted in staff's June 9, 2004 report, including conditions added at tonight's meeting and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Smyser stated this would to go the City Council on July 12, 2004. C. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, for a Rezoning (from R, Rural to R -1X, Single Family Executive) and Preliminary Plat, as well as MUSA Reserve Allocation, for West Shadow Ponds 2°d Addition, located at 607 — 62nd Street Chair Schaps reopened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. Mr. Thompson stated applicant had submitted an application to subdivide an existing lot into two lots. This will require a rezoning from Rural to R -1X, a preliminary plat, and the allocation of 0.74 acres of MUSA reserve. The site is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential land use and is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. Mr. Thompson indicated the project involves filling some wetland to create build able area for one of the proposed lots. Filling a wetland needs approval of the wetland mitigation from the Rice Creek Watershed District. The applicant has revised his proposal to minimize wetland fill to 394 square feet, which qualifies as a de minimus wetland fill. Mr. Thompson noted the notification of a public hearing was published and mailed to surrounding property owners. The Planning and Zoning Commission opened the public hearing and continued it to the June 9, 2004 meeting. Reconstruction of 62nd Street will occur this summer. Sanitary sewer and water will be extended west from the intersection with West Shadow Lake Drive to serve this property. Staff reviewed the engineer's recommendations, which included: 1. The developer is to be aware that the City of Lino Lakes is currently reconstructing 62nd Street. Prior to final approval of the Site Plans, the Grading Plan must show the changes that the street project with cause to each of the proposed lots. 2. Prior to final City approval of the Site and Grading Plans, the Plans needed to show that Lino Lakes City Engineering Standards are being followed. That is, a detail Site and Grading Plan will need to be submitted for before final approval is given. 3. Approval of the preliminary plat will be contingent upon the review and consequent approval of the City Engineer. Drainage and utility easements along property lines will be required. Easements over designated wetlands will also be required. 4. The homes to be constructed must follow City of Lino Lakes design flood elevations. For this location, the design 100 -year flood elevation to be used is 894.2. The emergency over flow elevation to be used is 895.3. Thus, City requirements are as follows: Low floor/basement elevation must be two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, low floor/basement must be one (1) foot above the emergency overflow DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 10 elevation and the low floor /basement elevation must be four (4) feet above the groundwater or normal ponding elevation. Staff reviewed their analysis and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That driveway access for Lot 2 is determined. 2. That RCWD approval for the de minimus wetland fill be approved. 3. The easement around the wetland must include additional buffer as proposed by the applicant. Wetland and buffer areas are to be identified with signs saying no fill, cutting, or dumping. Native seed mix from the City's list is to be used in these areas. • 4. The project shall not be final platted until 2005 to comply with the City's growth management policy. 5. The subject property be rezoned rural to residential. 6. That MUSA be allocated for this parcel. 7. The City's engineer's comments must be addressed to his satisfaction. • 8. The park dedication be paid. Mr. Rafferty asked if the driveway would enter 62nd. Mr. Thompson replied that was correct. Chair Schaps invited applicant to make comment. Mr. Matke, representative of applicant, stated the wetland on the east side would preclude and access, so the access would be on 62nd. He requested the driveways be put on the high side of the lot. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend closing the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend approval of the rezoning from Rural to R -1X and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend approval of the MUSA reallocation and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend the preliminary plat subject to the conditions as noted in staff's June 9, 2004 report and the conditions added at tonight's meeting and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 -0. DRAFT MINUTES • Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 11 • D. ELECT CHAIR AND VICE -CHAIR FOR REMAINDER OF 2004 • Staff stated due to the resignation of Chair Schaps, the Board needed to elect a new chair and vice -chair for the remainder of 2004. Mr. Pogalz nominated Mr. Rafferty to move from the Vice Chair position to the Chair position. Mr. Hyden nominated Mr. Tralle as Chair. Ms. Lane suggested the person who did not make Chair became the Vice Chair. Mr. Hyden stated the Chair was a lot of work and a lot of commitment. Mr. Rafferty stated the current Chair's position would be difficult to fill. He thanked Chair Schaps for his service and acknowledged this would require a lot of commitment and hoped he could fill the Chair position adequately. Mr. Tralle stated he agreed with Mr. Rafferty. He stated what he brought to the Board was extensive experience in running meetings through his Church and union meetings. A closed ballot was conducted. Chair Schaps announced that Mr. Rafferty was elected as Chair and Mr. Tralle was elected as Vice Chair. Chair Schaps congratulated the new Chair and Vice Chair and wished them luck. Mr. Smyser thanked Chair Schaps for all of his hard work and he was sorry to see him go. He stated he led the Board in a direction that he believed it needed to be lead. Chair Schaps thanked the City for this opportunity. He noted the City was a truly beautiful community. He stated he had the honor to serve with a number of great people in the City including the Mayors, Councils, and staff He stated the City has had great Boardmembers throughout the years and thanked them for their service to the City. He indicated he was leaving the City at a time of great strength. He thanked the citizens for all of their input over the years. He wished everyone luck in the future. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. REMINDER OF SPECIAL MEETING TO DISCUSS SIGNAGE: JUNE 16, 2004. Mr. Smyser reminded the Commission of the June 16, 2004 meting to discuss signage. He stated no action would be taken at that meeting, it would only be a discussion to discuss signage. He indicated the 30 to 40 business owners had been notified of this meeting. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board June 9, 2004 Page 12 VII. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Lane made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:14 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. DRAFT MINUTES • • • s • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V. B Jeff Smyser July 14, 2004 Final Plat: Elm Street Estates (formerly Lakeview Estates) Elm St. and Lakeview Drive The City Council approved the preliminary plat for Lakeview Estates with Resolution 03- 120 on September 8, 2003. Apparently, there already is a Lakeview Estates in Anoka County, so the applicant changed the name to Elm Street Estates. Under our subdivision ordinance, the final plat needs P & Z review prior to City Council approval. This project involves an existing residential lot with one existing house (7180 Lakeview Drive) at the corner of Elm Street and Lakeview Drive. The owner split the property into three lots, which creates two new house lots fronting on Elm St. The installation of city water and sanitary sewer service in Elm St. made this subdivision possible. The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. There is no development agreement because there are no public improvements for the plat. The City Attorney's review of the title commitment is underway and will be fully resolved prior to City Council approval of the final plat. Conditions of approval will be met with building permit review of the new houses. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plat for Elm Street Estates. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 1/2 RICH wON PPE 1/2 NCH woe PPE A 1.A EL.M STREET E T1LITE A 11 I Se .. • • •._._ • �t ...., -•.. •. ,.(). , -I N89'10'12 "E -NORTH UNE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, LEXINGTON PARK LAKE VIEW i 1/2 INCH RCN PIPE • r L 94.85 1 95.50 1 J 87.00 r 2 v3 r I BLOCK I 1 I L 87.00 —I J r r' ^ rni ; I I L 1 87.00 3 _ : • • AGENDA ITEM V. C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: July 14, 2004 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING (continued) Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development and Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addition Hokanson Development, Inc. BACKGROUND The P & Z opened the public hearing at the June 9 meeting and continued it to July. Hokanson Development has submitted a request for a conditional use permit for a residential planned unit development (PUD), and development stage plan (preliminary plat). The subject site is four acres of property at the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane, adjacent to the existing Marshan Lake Condominiums. A PUD is required for multi - family development in a shoreland area. The site was rezoned to R -3 earlier this year, making it consistent with the comprehensive plan. ANALYSIS Land Use, Density, Zoning The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site single family home and vacant Medium Density Residential R -3 Medium Density Residential North Marshan Lake Condominiums Medium Density Residential R -4 High Density Residential South commercial (Automotive Refinish Technol.) & residential Performance Lane Use and Low Density Sewered Residential GB General Bus. and R -1X Single Family Executive East Marshan Lake Condominiums Medium Density Residential R -4 High Density Residential West Lake Drive, Wenzel Farm townhomes Medium Density Residential R -3 Medium Density PDO Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 2 • The following is a summary of the of the proposal: • • Gross Site Area 4.05 acres Upland Area 4.05 acres Right of Way Dedication 0.21 acres Resulting Area 3.84 acres Total Units 23 Resulting Density 5.99 units /acre The existing Marshan Lake Condominiums were approved in 1995, with the second phase approved in 1996. They were built at a density of 6.4 units /acre, in accordance with the approved site plans. The City began work on a new comprehensive plan in 1996 -97 and approved it in 2002. The entire Marshan Lake Condominiums site and the remaining four -acres now proposed for development is guided Medium Density Residential. This allows a density of 3 -6 units per acre. The project falls within this range. Zoning: The four -acre site recently was rezoned to R -3, Medium Density Residential to make it consistent with the comprehensive plan. The site is within a shoreland overlay district. The specific requirements relative to the proposed project are discussed below under "Preliminary Plat /PUD ". The shoreland ordinance requires a PUD for multifamily development in a shoreland overlay area. Growth Management: The City's growth management policy (Ordinance 01 -03) implements growth policies of the comprehensive plan. It establishes limits on the number of new units to be approved as well on the use of MUSA reserve. The site is within the existing MUSA, so the MUSA reserve limit is not applicable The 147 units per year have been reached for 2004 and the allowable 20% also has been used (see attached table). Only 113 lots have been approved for 2005, so there are lots available. However, the projects listed in the table as "proposed" will push into the 20% for 2005. PRELIMINARY PLAT/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Section 2, Subd. 10 of the zoning ordinance discusses the purpose of a planned unit development (PUD). The application should be compared to these purposes in order to justify any flexibility requested by the applicant. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for the grouping of lots or buildings for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development. This section is intended to introduce • • Marshan Townhomes 2 °a Addn. flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of lots, buildings and activities, which promote the goals outlined in the Comprehensive Plan or serve another public purpose. It is further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance of parking, open space and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses. A residential conditional use permit PUD may include a variety of residential units, including single family and multifamily units as long as it complies with the density requirements. A non - residential conditional use peluiit PUD may include a variety of commercial and /or industrial uses. A PUD that includes a mix of residential and commercial /industrial uses must utilize the PUD zoning district as described in Sec. 9 Subd. 3 of this ordinance. The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage: 1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2 Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. 6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations. page 3 • • Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 4 The following table summarizes project design elements: Buildings, Units: The proposal includes eleven buildings. Ten buildings are twin homes, the other is a three -unit. They are all two -story structures. Each unit includes 1633 sf. The garages are similar in size to other recently approved PUD projects. The zoning ordinance requirements are as follows (Sec.3, Subd. 4.B.2.b.4)): Exterior Building Finish: The exterior of townhome dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, townhome dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: a) A minimum of twenty -five (25) percent of the combined area of all building facades of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco and /or natural or artificial stone. b) Except for brick, stucco, and /or natural or artificial stone, no single building facade shall have more than seventy -five (75) percent of one type of exterior finish. c) For the purpose of this section, the area of the building facade shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. We received building elevations on July 7th. They show a light brown vinyl siding with a darker brown vinyl shake in the gable ends. A dark brown brick veneer base is shown on the front of the buildings, though none on the sides or backs. • The Miller's Crossroads townhomes include stone around all sides of the buildings. Though they do not include as much stone as listed in the above zoning standards, the required proposed unit size R -3: 920 sf 1633 sf setbacks local street arterial street side yard rear yard 30 ft or 25 ft from internal streets in PUD 40 ft 10 ft 30 25 ft 40 ft 25 ft -- impervious max 65% shoreland: 35% 31% open space 50% for PUD 50.6% height max. 36 ft. 26 ft. at peak Buildings, Units: The proposal includes eleven buildings. Ten buildings are twin homes, the other is a three -unit. They are all two -story structures. Each unit includes 1633 sf. The garages are similar in size to other recently approved PUD projects. The zoning ordinance requirements are as follows (Sec.3, Subd. 4.B.2.b.4)): Exterior Building Finish: The exterior of townhome dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, townhome dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: a) A minimum of twenty -five (25) percent of the combined area of all building facades of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco and /or natural or artificial stone. b) Except for brick, stucco, and /or natural or artificial stone, no single building facade shall have more than seventy -five (75) percent of one type of exterior finish. c) For the purpose of this section, the area of the building facade shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. We received building elevations on July 7th. They show a light brown vinyl siding with a darker brown vinyl shake in the gable ends. A dark brown brick veneer base is shown on the front of the buildings, though none on the sides or backs. • The Miller's Crossroads townhomes include stone around all sides of the buildings. Though they do not include as much stone as listed in the above zoning standards, the Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 5 • project met the purposes of a PUD, which allows for some flexibility. The question is whether this project merits the same flexibility. • Judging from the submitted elevations, there is no aesthetic reason not to include a brick base all around the buildings. This would be a gesture to the intent of the architectural requirements. The exteriors of the existing buildings lack such a base, so it isn't necessary to require more extensive architectural treatments on the backs of the structures. The backs will be facing the internal areas of the site. Structure Setbacks: We have been experiencing confusion among builders due to the adoption last year of the International Building Code. Fire protection requirements in the code dictate a minimum structure separation from property lines unless the structure includes specified fire protection elements. To meet the code requirements, the furthest projection must be at least three feet from the property line or special fire protection requirements apply. This would include no openings such as windows or soffit vents. Lino Lakes has made the decision that the building must meet the three -foot separation from the actual property line of the unit rather than outer border of the larger common area property line. The plans show that the unit lot property extends 10 feet around each building except the sunrooms on the rear of the buildings. The individual unit lots must be platted deeper to ensure that this three foot separation is met. This must be shown on the final plat. Streets, Access: The plan shows additional right of way to be dedicated for Lake Drive (CSAH 23). This would meet Anoka County's requirement for 60' from centerline. Access to most buildings would be via private drives off of Aqua Circle. The drives are 24 ft. wide, back of curb to back of curb. The Century Farm North project has the same design for the townhome access drives. The existing Marshan Townhomes have wider access drives: 28' back of curbs. The proposal is acceptable. The plan shows separate driveways onto Aqua Lane for Units 1, 2, 3, and 4. Other options exist. The two twin -home structures could face one another across a shared drive. A driveway exists that serves the existing townhomes on the north side of the site. It was constructed centered on the property line. This driveway could be used by the current proposal with a shared driveway agreement. This was the original intent of this driveway. However, the property to the north now is under separate ownership. There are some trees in the proposed open area that would be lost with either of these options. As long as a large open area is being preserved, it's logical to have it in an area where existing mature trees can be preserved. The main question is whether these trees really can be preserved with the demolition of the existing structures in the immediate proximity to these trees. • At the request of the P & Z, I contacted the Fire and Police Depts. to ask if the length of the driveways in the existing development has created any public safety concerns. The • Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 6 Police Dept. said there have been no problems from their perspective. The Fire Chief also informed me that there have been no problems. Since the existing townhomes used this design, he had no concern. Though the new proposed driveway is even longer than the existing ones, the Aqua Lane and Lake Drive are close enough to provide access in addition to the driveway itself. For future new development, we probably should consider turnaround areas on drives of this length. Guest Parking: The P & Z desired that guest parking spaces be added, even though this would reduce the open space and increase the impervious surface area. The applicant has submitted a drawing showing 18 guest parking stalls added to the plan. This would require spreading the buildings apart in several places and increasing the length of the access drives. The drive /parking areas would still be 10 feet from the new right of way of Lake Drive. The proposed alternative is workable. Grading and landscaping must be adjusted to accommodate the change. A new set of plans that includes this design must be submitted three weeks prior to city council review. Utilities, Stormwater Management: There is no ponding or treatment included in the proposal. The existing stormwater management design for the area accommodates development on this site. However, stormwater treatment must be provided in accordance with the most recent regulatory requirements. This will be reviewed in greater detail as the project progresses. • The Rice Creek Watershed District requires District review for multi -unit development over 2.5 acres. The Watershed District granted preliminary approval on June 23. Some adjustments to utility connections have been reviewed by the City Engineer since the May 5 submittal. Landscaping: The existing townhomes screen this site from the lake, so screening is not an issue as it might be for lakeshore property. The proposed landscaping is adequate. However, several species should be changed according to the Environmental Board's recommendations, as listed in the conditions of approval. In addition, three spruce trees must be moved out of the line of sight for vehicles at the intersection waiting to turn onto Lake Drive. This can be shown on a new landscaping plan prior to city council approval. Lighting: No street or yard lighting is shown on the plans. There is no reason to provide any such lighting. Park Dedication: The applicant has maintained that land dedicated with the larger development included the dedication for most of the current four -acre site. Staff has researched the file for the Marshan condominiums project. The situation is complicated because there is some, but not complete overlap of the two project areas, the original project was not completely built, and the ordinance requirements for park dedication have changed. • • Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 7 The 1995 project included 29.9 acres. A total of 139 units were approved for the project. The density then was 139/29.9 = 4.65 u/a. Part of the site included an area of 1.5 acres labeled "future commercial" in which no dwelling units were shown. One 5 -unit building did not get built, as it was on land not ultimately platted as part of the project. Both of these areas are within the four -acre site of the current proposal. At the time, the subdivision ordinance included a progressive scale: the percentage of land for park dedication increased as the density of a project increased. (This was adopted with Ordinance 05 -91.) A density of 3 to 5 units per acre required a park dedication of 12% of the land. Twelve percent of 29.9 acres is 3.6 acres. The developer dedicated a 3.0 acre park and a trail corridor of 0.6 acres, for a total of 3.6 acres. Current park dedication is $1665 per unit when land is not needed. For the 23 units currently proposed, this would total $38,295. The developer maintains that he should not be charged dedication for the 1.5 acres "future commercial" area or for the area where the five units didn't get built. It is reasonable to give credit for the five units that did not get built, and staff recommends doing so. This reduces the dedication by 5 x $1665 = $8,325 . However, it is not appropriate simply to give credit for the 1.5 acres by completely eliminating it from any new dedication. There were no units shown in that area on the 1995 plan. Though the land was included in the calculations for the original project, the additional units were not. Removing the 1.5 acres from consideration for additional dedication would be like not charging park dedication for new units being built in the spaces between the existing buildings. (There are 11 units in that area on the new proposal. Had there been another 11 or 12 units there, it would have raised the density of the 1995 project to 5+ units /acre, which would have required a 14% park dedication (139 + 11 = 150 and 150/29.9 acres = 5.02 u/a). This would have required a dedication of 29.9 acres x 14% = 4.19 acres. Since 3.6 acres was dedicated, there would have been a shortage of 0.59 acres of park dedication.) It is appropriate to get additional park dedication since the additional units generate additional demand for park services. It also is reasonable to consider giving some credit for the past park dedication on the 1995 project. The ordinance at the time included an equation for calculating cash dedication. It used a land value of $10,000 per acre. This seems reasonable. The project density fell into the 12% park dedication category. Applying this to that land value yields $10,000 x 12% = $1200. This is a reasonable credit for the past dedication. Summarized, this all results in the following: • Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 8 23 new units x $1665 = $38,295 less credit for 5 units: 5 x $1665 = ($8,325) less credit for past dedication on 1.5 acres = ($1,200) total new park dedication $28,770 Staff is recommending a park dedication of $28,770 for the new project. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed the application on May 26th. The comments are attached. Changes to species are included in the conditions of approval. Inspection of imported soils is required by development agreements. Irrigating the sod areas is listed in notes on the landscaping plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following conditions should be attached to any approval of the project: lb Additional right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County to total 60 feet from centerline for Lake Drive (CSAH 23). 2. Right of access shall be dedicated to Anoka County along CSAH 23 on the final plat. 3. New plans showing the extended driveways and guest parking stalls shall be submitted three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application. Plans must show landscaping, grading, and any other alterations needed to accommodate the changes. 4. A new landscaping plan shall be submitted with the following changes three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application: - change black ash to green ash or a native oak species - change Colorado spruce to white spruce - change Austrian pine to red or white pine - change autumn applause to northern pin oak - three spruce at the Aqua Lane corner shall be relocated and other landscaping adjusted to accommodate the guest parking stalls 5. The new plans must include larger individual unit lots to ensure that the eaves and any building projection meets the property line separation to meet fire protection requirements in the building code. Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 9 • 6. The City Engineer's comments in the July 9, 2004 memo must be met to his satisfaction. 7. Park dedication shall be $28,770. 8. Existing buildings on the site shall be removed. 9. The existing well and onsite septic system shall be properly abandoned. 10. Brick veneer base shall be included on all four sides of the buildings. OPTIONS 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit /Planned Unit Development and Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, with conditions. 2. Deny the application. RECOMMENDATION • Option 1 This report is based on the following documents: • Existing Conditions, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Preliminary Plat, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Utility Plan, update received July 9 • Tree Preservation Plan, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Landscape Plan, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Landscape Details, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Detail Sheets (2), May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Building Elevations and Floor Plans, 2 -unit and 3 -unit Buildings, May 6, 2004, received May 7 • Alternative layouts, faxed July 6, 2004 • Color building elevations received July 7, 2004 N N z 13 1— 0 J Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) 2003 -09 TOTAL maximum 1029 O LO N 2491 T T(0 0 CO 152 N T T T �p N 0 18 00 T C\1 h Q) 1) O) O O Cl O CO 0 0 N O 1- O O N co co M M t0 O O N co ti N 0 0 N N LC) 51 0 T CO T CO T N Cr) N 165 •t O 0 N L 65 T 56, 1 47 T N CO I,. r M O 0 N 1 _ 52 56 T O O T CO 22 N T T CO Tr r' year end 2002 51 r E is N L 11 MO T O o) N T O co O CO `N T N- N O T T v N 0 0 00 CO T CV Cr) N Development Name approved prelim. plats Stoneybrook 2nd Addn Century Farms North Keefe: preliminary plat Morton (minor subdiv) Ravens Hollow Haley Manor (10 new Tots) Crystal Cove Millers Crossroads Lakeview Estates (2 new) Snell (minor subdivision) Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th Justin's Preserve Marshan Estates Rice Creek Church duplex Rice Church: Oakwood View a a) 0 Q O L n. 1Highland Meadows East 2nd 1 Pheasant Hills 12th island West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add Junes Addn Marshan Townhomes 2nd 1a 0 N CO ti N O N O O N • N T ▪ L — o 0) C N C O O O O) a) C C E .0 cTs .Es E E N L L • \ �\ A\ 3 \ 2 1\ \5 \ LIN in mge",‘ 111 eldban r r 111 2e' e-B CURB ! 00IIE5 DRNCWAY GIUNiain ER I i • 111 2e' 6 —e CURB a DUTTER DRVEWAY akin n 28' 8-5 CURB at COMM DRIVEWAY dragli r I all oaMWAY 2e' 5-6 00R R% 6 6 GOITER 040 wow g. 100 *AO Immo mow ofoi % Imp wows 120' ITIER t . Nta, tort wow% 0 tstata istf-'11 DUTf6R OR�RY `,t 1e' e -6 CURB / CURE 286 ITA 207 Memorandum DATE: July 9, 2004 TO: Jeff Smyser FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Marshan Lake Townhomes 2 "d Addition Attached is the TKDA review dated July 9, 2004, of the submitted documents for the Marshan Lake Townhomes 2nd Addition site. Please note that there will have to be changes to the utility design because the City will not allow main line extensions from the existing 4" service stubs. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this project. Please contact me with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway; Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651- 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Marshall Lake Townhomes Copies To: 2nd Addition City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Comm. No. 12701 -002 From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Routing: Date: July 9, 2004 Engineering Reviews for this proposed development were previously prepared and presented in memorandums dated December 5, 2003, and June 4, 2004. A revised Utility Plan has since been received by the City of Lino Lakes (received July 2, 2004). This review memorandum as presented herein essentially repeats much of the same information presented in the June 4, 2004 memorandum, along with adjustments as a result of the revised utility plan received. •Comments provided in the June 4, 2004 memorandum were based on information provided in the following documents: 1. Cover letters from Hokanson Development dated May 6, 2004 and May 20, 2004. 2. Legal Counsel Facsimile dated February 20, 2004. 3. Letter regarding the Conditional Use permit dated January 12, 2004. 4. Narrative Addendum for Conditional Use Permit dated May 6, 2004. 5. Stormwater Pond Calculations dated May 6, 2004. 6. Lighting Information dated December 4, 2003. 7. Park Board Review dated December 1, 2003. 8. Architectural Plan Set Cover page received May 7, 2004. 9. Preliminary Plan Set (11 sheets - 11X17 and full size), prepared by Schoell and Madson, dated May 5, 2004. 10. Full size and 11X17 size Architectural Plans (3 sheets each), for both 2 -unit and 3 -unit buildings. Narrative for Comprehensive Plan Amendment, prepared by Hokanson Development, Inc., and received by the City of Lino Lakes October 28, 2003. 11. Soil Borings prepared by Braun Intertec dated June 16, 1995, and Geotechnical Evaluation by Braun dated July 24, 1995. 12. Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Lori J. Marco dated April 7, 1994. 13. Aerial photo of the site (date ?), received May 20, 2004. The revised utility plan received for this review is Sheet 6 of 11(received by the City of Lino Lakes on July 2, 2004), but still dated May 5, 2004. Revisions to the plan have been hand drafted into the plan. It is • expected that a revised utility plan with a new revision date (and signed by the Engineer) will also be received. • • Marshan Lake Townhomes Review Page 2 July 9, 2004 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Comments are as follows: 1. The plans essentially provide for the construction of 23 townhome units, constructed as (10) X 2 -unit buildings and (1) X 3 -unit building, all located between Lake Drive and Aqua Circle, and north of Aqua Lane. Access to 19 of the units would be from two (2) individual shared private driveways extending from Aqua Circle, with the other 4 units accessing directly to Aqua Circle. Under the revised utility plan, utilities (water and sewer) are proposed to be connected to existing services from Aqua Circle. No access to Lake Drive or work within the Lake Drive right -of -way is proposed. 2. It is not expected that any construction related permits from Anoka County will be required. However, any side grading into the Anoka County right of way would require a permit. Because the property is adjacent to the County Roadway, the Preliminary and Final plats will require the review of the County. An additional dedication of 15 feet to the County right of way is shown as required by Anoka County. The applicant shall also be aware of intersection sight distance requirements, and that no trees or vegetation may be planted within the County right of way, or at locations that will restrict comer visibility sight lines. This would also include signs, berming, or other surface features. The final Landscaping Plan shall therefore be subject to further review and approval of the City and County as needed. 3 For drainage of the site, the Plan utilizes an existing storm sewer and ponding system to the east of the property. Drainage calculations were previously submitted for the December 5 review. Stormwater pond calculations dated May 6, 2004 have also been provided and reviewed. This site was previously reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed district as part of a much larger developed area that includes the existing property to the east. The proposed site development (high density residential) is consistent with the property use considered in the previous original drainage design for the larger area. The proposed new construction therefore appears to fit and conform with the original submittal. However, approval and/or acknowledgement from the Rice Creek Watershed District will be needed to confirm compliance with the original permit. 4. Because the site area exceeds one acre, the development also falls under the new rules requiring an NPDES permit. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining this permit. This also includes the submittal of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City in accordance with NPDES requirements. Silt fence and erosion control details are provided on the plans and shall be installed accordingly. 5. Per the Survey and Existing Conditions Plan, several buildings including houses, barns, sheds, and a garage all exist on the site. Demolition, removal, and grading of the site will therefore be required. The applicant will be responsible for the complete removal of all buildings, foundations, underground and above ground items, capping of any existing utility connections and wells, and removal of any underground, fuel storage or septic systems that may exist. All debris and unsuitable material must be removed from the site. Any material imported to the site must be approved by the City Engineer. Marshan Lake Townhomes Review Page 3 July 9, 2004 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 6. Geotechnical information has been provided. The borings and associated report cover a larger area that extends beyond this proposed development. However, the same general comments apply and can be summarized as follows: Additional excavation of fine alluvial silts and replacement with compactable granular material may be required for construction of the buildings and private drives. Groundwater levels may also necessitate dewatering for the utility installations. Any imported topsoil, fill material, or granular materials for roadway and building foundation (material and source) must be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The plans provide building elevations. The lowest floor elevations must meet City of Lino Lakes requirements with regards to separation from adjacent high water elevations and groundwater levels. Based upon the geotechnical information provided, the elevations are acceptable. 8. The preliminary plat provides for standard drainage and utility easements (10 feet in width) around the perimeter of the property as required. In addition, 44 foot wide drainage and utility easements covering the two private driveways are also provided. It is recommended that the driveway easements as shown also be dedicated as access easements in addition to the drainage and utility dedication. 9. All utility work shall be performed in accordance with the City of Lino Lakes, City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Specifications, and City of Lino Lakes building permit requirements. Water pipe and appurtenances shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, and as follows: Hydrants - Waterous Pacer WB -67; Valves - Mueller A2370 -20 or equal. DIP pipe shall be Class 52. All sanitary sewer service pipes shall be SDR 26 or Schedule 40. The location and number of hydrants will be subject to the review of the City Fire Chief. Safety and traffic control during construction must be provided in accordance with the State of Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 10. Revisions have been made to the Utility Plan (Sheet 6 of 11) as follows: A. The watermain loop through the site has been sized up from 6 -inch diameter to 8 -inch diameter per City of Lino Lakes requirements. B. The revised Utility Plan provides for revisions to main and service connections that result in fewer excavations into the existing street (Aqua Circle). This is accomplished by utilizing more of the existing services, and by extending water and sewer mains parallel to Aqua Circle within the boulevard to serve the northerly 4 properties. This normally would not be a concern except that the 8 -inch watermain loop would now connect to 4 -inch lines at each end, and the 8 -inch sanitary sewer mains would connect to existing 6 -inch services. Standard practice generally discourages larger diameter pipes feeding into smaller diameter pipes. In addition, the condition and grades of these existing services would require verification of their adequacy at the time excavations are made. The City will not allow any main line utility extensions from the existing 4" service stubs. The existing 6" stubs can be connected to with 8" lines. The sanitary sewer extensions must have a manhole as the connection. No sanitary sewer main line cleanouts will be allowed. Marshan Lake Townhomes Review Page 4 July 9, 2004 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 11. All utility extensions and streets /driveways proposed are considered private and will not be owned or maintained by the City of Lino Lakes. This must be detailed in an Agreement between the City and the Applicant. It is also recommended that the utility plan show the specific locations of individual valve boxes and their service termination points (between street and building). Individual sanitary sewer and water services must also meet minimum separation distances. 12. All grassed or swaled drainage ways must have a minimum slope of 2 %. 13. It is recommended that the proposed storm sewer be extended to the foot of the south driveway to pick up drainage, similar to that proposed for the north driveway. 14. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining permits from the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for the water and sanitary sewer installations as required. 15. All street restoration shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes. 16. The lighting layout, number of lights, and type of fixture is subject to the approval of the City of Lino • Lakes. • • • Environmental Memo To: Jeff Smyser From: Marty Asleson CC: Michael Grochala Date: June 1, 2004 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations From 5/26/04 The Environmental Board made the following recommendations at the May 26, 2004 Environmental Board meeting: Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addition 1. Ensure that the lighting plan conforms to the City code. 2. Make changes to the landscape plan species list as per December Environmental Board recommendations: • Change Black ash to Green ash or one of the native oak species. • Change Colorado spruce to white spruce. • Change Austrian pine to Red or White pine. • Change Autumn applause to Northern pin oak. 3. Reduce impervious parking surfaces if possible. 4. No soils should be imported or exported with out City permission. 5. Deep tilling should occur on all planting areas. • Page 1 3rd • • • 6. Re -seed native seed in pond area. Use the City specifications. This should be coordinated between the City, Developer, and the existing town home association. 7. All sod areas should be irrigated. Motion made recommending to approve by Grundhoffer, 2nd by O'Connell, all were in favor. West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition 1. Wetland areas and buffer areas proposed are identified with signage describing no fill, cutting or dumping. 2. The City should approve all imported or exported soils. 3. All soils to be restored with plantings should be deep tilled to a minimum depth of 6 to 8 inches before planting. 4. Item 5a of deed restriction document include language that includes specifications for City native seed mix in buffer areas if disturbance occurs or replanting occurs. 5. Show the location of tree preservation fences on the plan. Motion to recommend approval with suggestions made by Bauman, 2nd by O'Connell, All were in favor. • Page 2 • JUL-06 -2004 TUE 03:32 PM HOKANSON PLUMBING July 6, 2004 FAX NO. 763 784 9136 P. 02 • n i. g; , ;fit. � '1,';r;':' ?1 ,�• L Iii -14 •r .. .. � � r Mr. Jeff Smyscr City Planner City of Lino 1,akes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 ltl.: Marslmn fake Second Plan Dear Jeff, As a follow up 14) our meeting on June 9th we are providing this summary of our current thoughts on the issues raised by the Planning Commission and staff: 1, Elevations: As noted, building elevations include a variation in building materials distributed throughout the building facade to integrate an architecturally balanced appearance while enhancing visual variety and continuity. The objective of the proposed color pallets and building materials is to attain a compatible and appealing development that blends in well with surrounding area. Typical building makeup includes a brown hue stone veneer base, in conjunction with vinyl siding and shakes on gable ends. The usage and placement of the stone base is similar to most ,single family designs, i.e. no stone is proposed on the rear facade. All garage doors, doors, fascia, soffit, windows and transoms will he white in color with white accent trine. The roof will be composition asphalt shingles in a shade of brown, incorporating) a minimum 18" overhang. As discussed at the June 9`b meeting, it seems as though there was a degree of uncertainty of what was desired of this project as two differing approaches for color schemes were discussed by the Commission. One was a desire to have tip to four color schemes, while the other was to have one color scheme. We would prefer to have one color schema for the eleven structures, as this will create a more cohesive and knitted neighborhood. We understand that the Comrtiission would like to choose color(s) and a color pallet will be available for the Planning Commission. 2. Access: Our initial plan raised a concern by the Planning Commission about the width of the twenty -four feet (24') private drives. As the design complies with the zoning ordinance and that the City has previously allowed other developments with similar width drives and length (i.c. Miller Crossing and Century Farms), we are confident that this width is not so unique. As our interests arc completely aligned with the City, the private drives do not exceed the niaximum drive length, and that we have limited the amount of private drives and further provided a fire hydrant nt (ht.: end of the southern most private drive. Ilence, wc: feel the design protects the public interests and with the additional parking spaces provided, emergency access is better than a plan just meeting the code. 3. Sewer /\ ij'er: Portlier discussions with the City Engineer, we are receptive to tin agreement that utilities be served by the existing; three stubs and that all units be served with Sewer and Water from connections at Aqua Circle. 0174 1c aniti Mit•tnc ;. ;otat 55449 (I6„ 3) 78(3-31:40 E).x (/63) ?84-:31\31 • JUL-06 -2004 TUE 03:33 PM HOKANSON PLUMBING FAX NO 763 784 9136 P. 03 4. Park l?cciieattlone We have requested support for previous assessments that we have contributed since we believe they should mostly cover park dedication needs (Lino Lakes Marshan Leke Condos Summary of Financial Requirements — dated January 30, 1996). As noted, a majority of the current site was also part of the initial Marshan T.ake Condominiums project totaling 30.25 acres. During the initial review of Marshan Lalcc Condominiums, over three acres of land along with a trail corridor were dedicated as part of Marshan Lake Condominiums as live acres of public parklands were designated by the Comprehensive l'Jan for this part of Lino 1.akes. Along with the three acres for a public park, a 20' wide public trail corridor adjacent to Marshan Lake was also dedicated/built (Shores of Marshan 11 mono — dated June 9, 1995 — Marty Asleson). As over 10 percent of lands were previously dedieated fur public park and trail purposes, no additional lands /cash should be required for that part dedicated. However, Jiokanson did not own a small portion of the underlying lot (47,485 square feet) and we feel only this portion is subject to the current park dedication component. 5. Change::: rt .,eosin,: We understand that the City is encouraged to maximize density within the MU A. Our plan meets density on this site and we believe that the City is better off with the proposed density on this particular site for this reason. Marshan will serve to diversify the lifestyles and housing opportunities available in this quadrant of the city - - creating a neighborhood that is responsive to the needs of residents and the larger community. 6. Included with this request are four plans discussed below; Option A With Exlra Parking is our preferred plan with 23 units, with the addition of eighteen additional guest parking spaces in conjunction with the existing ninety two (23 units X 4 pnrking - 92) for a total of 110 parking spaces (4.78 parking spaces per unit). With tltc additional parking spaces, approximately thirty four percent of the site is iinperviotis; thereby, complying with the maximum 35% impervious requirement. This concept does not conflict with our desire to preserve the trees currently existing on the site. The project's layout has been designed to provide an intimate setting that is intensely landscaped, places parking sway from adjacent public streets, maintains vegetation, and provides open space opportunities that the Environmental Review Board so desired. The proposed plan mats all current land use codes by orienting buildings to the internal private drive or to the abutting public street. All of these buildings have entrances that face directly onto public streets or private drives. The preferred plan with varying the setbacks and drive locations creates variety in the stree seape. All building setbacks are behind the standard utility easements; therefore, they do not adversely impact the public interests. The intent of the plan was to provide separation between this development and existing Marshan Lake, while also complimenting certain aspects of existing Marshan, i.e. the plan replicates the placement of dwellings with drive access onto Aqua Circle. The proposed plan promotes variety in housing layout as the majority or homes will face private and public ways, while some will back greenbelts, a preferred living condition for some people. The private drives provide. sufficient access to the attached single- family homes. All units are within 150 feet of a public street, and have adequate access to those streets. Marshan was planned with scvcral design objectives: Y Create a more attractive streetscapo Use side and front facing units onto public streets, avoid a one scheme dominated streetscipe • JUL -06 -2004 TUE 03:33 PM HOKANSON PLUMBING FAX NO. 763 784 9136 P. 04 • Pay close attention to architecture on all sides of the homes • Create a color palette that is visually appealing and exciting • Create .L pedestrian friendly environment • Pedestrian aunenities as open space • Use variety of ]rousing layout The preferred flan exceeds the intent of the land -use code and we feel the wooded areas of this site are also unique and are valuable to preserve. • Alternate One k a plan that tcrnoves thc four units from accessing onto Aqua Circle and places their access onto the private drive that currently exists on the north properly line. While accessing the built private drive does meet technical requirements, it does provide an additional need for this association to coordinate with the existing Marshan condoriniurns. Further, there is no appreciable gain with impervious arca and the layout destroys wooded areas of this site that are worth preserving. • Alternate Two is a plan that combines the three sets of duplexes into two triplexes. While maintaining the density of the proposal, the units created create two additional internal unit` that are not as desirable as corner units with no appreciable gain in pervious arca. Further, open space between structures is compromised with this design. • Alternate 'Three is a plan that provides an additional private drive into the subject site; providing rtoccrss for four units. This plan also maintains the density of the proposal; however, the layout destroys wooded areas of this site, reduces the amount of open space, increases impervious and does not create a harmonious development as initially proposed. Our preferred plan Option A exceeds the intent of the land use code and is preferable, emphasizing that it is also a plan that m cts all thc requirements of node. The resulting land use pattern will provide a moderately dense community buffering and enhancing the adjacent single family residential, multi-family residential and commercial uses along Lake Drive and Aqua Lane. We hope this summary will help in the consideration of our proposed plan. Please contact me with any additional questions or comments that you may have. Sincerely, I.10K ANSC)N FAMILY PARi'NERSITIP Ronald G. Fuchs 1 and Planner At taellments JUL -06 -2004 TUE 03:34 PM HOKANSON PLUMBING 5 •j rr.nz; z;zaa FAX NO, 763 784 9136 P, 05 4 ._, �___ �INi�r1 vnbv Tful) L a .ri,J- ai C.; ri •••f401 OII h. V..O _ Cj CT / ! S9C -Z SG est :ot i3O to Inc • • JUL-06-2004 TUE 03:34 PM HOKANSON PLUMBING FAX NO 763 784 9136 P. 06 AutmcE 41i ilitifirSMItiW . • 121:fsrfO:n:s1::f=sfg: ;44ii155i5iriTI;Pili i 11..1NfilifflliMillfili! E 1 .n!.1.,43.!.:;-.....if..-.. ';:1;!1,14111;;e:i.lt!!,ffi4 il 5 ir.'111:39nV.Gs5-.:"ts. 3 t a3P.M etTF.v., — Li 1 I 44' f71 44 00 j 11 ,A2 137: 4 j. ;1 !Is •—• C,7•1; 't .r....C.**6641•441.14.coMp4.1. / 4, / / / / / (—) JR-06-2004 TUE 03:35 PM HOKANSON PLUMBING FAX NO 763 784 9136 AL,TEI\IM 4 3 a P. 07 11; IvnI Vflbtr .01, •■■ ■Th .;!Tiz ■• • • • • • • •••■•• AIM j77"7:14'•''7;4f 1; a 71: 1 4 0 E/. ae X V2 ,- i- r 1-•• ;i.; / n 'IR 1 ' / I / k"C / / r1 d 1 1- I 0 , 4.1 I r :, ■ ■ I. . , •—, , 11- S7 I. I / & I I I/ i i, ttl 0 1 1 IL -I i- -4' . / , , / ..1 f 1-- l ..1 I -‘"...r.,. I 1 I t.:-•4' li , 1 . Ce ; ' / . .1 i 1 .. -...,..,, fd IIP I 01 li / / 07' / mi / c...) ._...... ,:- // .1 1 I 1 . 1. ‘ ,1---'------ . ' " • . .1— '1 "J->' / IL') 1 ..,,,:,,•‘,.. i 1 —. -. -.. , 1 •:..-:::: ',..... . . i . l, cq 4 / _ ----. gfr.gC/I ../..--,. , .1.- ....1 1/ /1/ I ' .:•-■3.,: .77'44.: 7 ;37t-7,',.17T.7."r!rt:•.' '' .44VV4.44Tm.q..401,scfror.mq0m.t44, . , , . , OW 41.1.1.4N1.4,4..4....4..... 4 ..........,,■•■ . . 4 , !II JUL -06 -2004 TUE 03:35 PM HOKANSON PLUMBING 1 FAX N0. 763 784 9136 P. 08 14175zA)K E 3 p2 1 X is ly A'. K x a. WTI ti W Q _I._ AP J T. XL. ! sT ! / I 1 1 1 l l / •k. ^Z 'V x'1.1 l ' / -� .1 C? r y 4 R . z LLZ = N E � = w 60 = CITY OF LUAU LAKES OF PH Tan= ale nor Non II Nu, e.11111 z 4 CINNAMON TEAL COURT 2SU NO. TRACT C l�2 ©©Olial➢01oW Mgr Fnrrcunws n• MARSHAN l IVE 'GL O E, G272829 17 1819120 ENVIEW AVE 7 8 97 /0 O.L. A OUTLOT A 9 FP <, '22 28 RKV EW 02 \�5 N ti 15 16 RICE LAKE • PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Public /Semi- Public Low Density Sewered Residential Low Density Sewered Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential • ZONING MAP -^‹,.,„„ii • • / • . ••••••,_ f '''••••• • i ---/ -"••••,....,,L, If • i ri' t ,f. 9 r 1 :I 0 9 i 9 r -• 4 T , • A h _ ,...,....____ . • ii k-:1, v•••'' • TREF I FGFND Number following abbreviation denotes estimated diameter a. in inches, three feet above ground level. The second number Of any) denotes the number of trunks at that " location (1 denotes o dead tree). Number following shrubs denotes Is diameter in feet. 4A. „vt 1117.• --•.,er A:" , --- --- -- --SO"- ......900--' .... "'"C•4 7r1 --- ,r) ,1 • `,-, ZN, :4:1'il\:'1111 t S\040;17850881W°C°1 - .."--. .,,' ,,, - - ---„, --- i --.. . — al I t, ‘ NI el 081 (.--) i 0 11 \ --, .. , fl' 1 t 4 '0 t",-t, I I 8, 1 11 . t " • i • s cs ci. i li I ' I i IRA e ""' CNI r- 11 1 ) • i• i I a, _ ..,..- ,-- •-....., 1 \ H ,,.......;, / 1 i l:,' „.,, ....--- • m, 1.,.'" , i r 1 i / ( i 4C)< i I 1 1 I i - a, , ,.., ,4 ',,,,,,‘,.. '0" 00 u 1 CC .-...., \ --- --..'■ t 0 47 .v- . i , 1 .1....-.) 0 ...'7.-0 EN • CM < ire .,, 2 - 6'.-..-. ...; co •-/ ....., / lig 1 --- ---17-• ... i 4) 1,1 (.1T ..er --- --••-. ......... •••,,, fi \ :1'. o i / 1 --,,, fit 1 %d "bL8 a'"t ) , t<1t.44› .w." -‘,." • , 1 I , t i *, {•' I i s t ,.- 0 ....... 4., / 4 ,,,: i, ,.0A . .,:ar1, , . • , , C... c -f , N .'. l \ 7 I il t a ? . <e\ — 1' ) \ "\ 1 , \, -„_.. ,.....,.....,,...4 ‹... - \-....„ .., ..--- ........, ...... ,..._-.., i i:,,,,.. ..........,„:........ ....... ......., . ....._ , _ ......, .....z,:,---,— .... ..• £ u.! ./-r,...., ,...., W. Line of Gov't. Lot 2, Sec 20, T 31, R, 22 -`-------_,, - / NE1/4of -••••••t„ r-'''- c\I CO i( FOr ight rne of kn 6110,y I • -" os- o - State r C rrint. VIWIIS Date: Description: 5/05/04 REVISED PUT By: DFD Date: Description: By: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Licensed Professional le of Minnesota. fi<wwwm2X- Oki Kenneth Adolf Date: 5/05/04 Reg No 12048 Designed By XA Drawn By Checked liy. KA ,,Schoell & Madson, Inc. e==1 Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soil Testing • Environmental Services wwwschoelmadsoncom 110580 Wayzata Boulevard, &del 554 Thrd Street MN, Stile 100 Minneapois, Minnesota 55305-1525 a River, Mvinesota 55330-1409 phone: (952) 546-7601- las: (952) 546-9065 Mane, (763) 241-0108 - tar (652) 546-9065 keg 07- 4•174 '611" Denotes deciduous tree. Q Denotes shrub. Denotes coniferous tree. "•-••••-■ Denotes tree line. A Denotes Ash AV Denotes Arbor Vitae BF Denotes Balsam Fir BA Denotes Bosswood BI Denotes Birch BE Denotes Box Elder BN Denotes Butternut BU Denotes Bush CA Denotes Cotolpo CR Denotes Cedar CH Denotes Cherry CN Denotes Cottonwood DG Denotes Dogwood EL Denotes Elm FR Denotes Fruit GN Denotes Gingko H Denotes Hackberry HC Denotes Horse Chestnut IR Denotes Ironwood JU Denotes Juniper KC Denotes Kentucky Coffee LI Denotes Lilac LO Denotes Locust M Denotes Mople MP Denotes Mugo Pine O Denotes Oak PI Denotes Pine PO Denotes Poplar R0 Denotes Russian Olive SM Denotes Silver Maple SP Denotes Spruce ,.„ TD Denotes Tree Deciduous TE Denotes Tree Ever WA Denotes Wolnut SCPJIVED Cs WI Denotes Willow I MAY 0 7 2004 CffY LitV0 Lioces Example: sz3,b. BE.8.2 0 0 0 0 / LEGEND —898- - - EXISTING CONTOUR < < raIRSVMA14.4.511.T, 0 (I, 1777:779 0 BOUNDARY UNE DRAINAGE/UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING STORM MANHOLE/CB EXISTING FES/FES WITH RIPRAP EXISTING BITUMINOUS EXISTING CONCRETE 1•1( 30 60 90 SCALE IN FEET Cient Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 letantl Street N.E. Blaine MN. 55434 17631 7136-3130 Protect Name/Location: Morahan Townhomes 2nd Addtion Lino Wws, Minnesota Sheet Tillw EXISTING CONDITIONS Data 5/05/04 Sheet 3 11 0, SM1 Project Number: 63506-004 • F:1ENG16350610041DN 0 24 LAKE DRIVE 'DE0.IC_ATION 0.. . c 60.00 5 60.00 6 60.00' 60.00 44' DRAINAGE AND 1- 0 2i' B-rB I C LE 60.00 9 N 10 60.00' 60.00 11 60.00 12 60.00' \ _ UTILITY EASEAIENL 3L 1'�,1, 24 0 Ao 13.35' 41 16 24 314.19 00 0 13 14 15 0 0_ 17 44' DRAINAGE AND - UTILITY EASEMENT 24' B 15'R TYP 30' 24 wt 0 z w z Z a: ¢ ow Revisions Date: Description: 5/05/04 REVISED PLAT By: Date: Description: By: DFD 60' BUILDING SETBACKS C.S.A.H. No. 23 (LAKE DRIVE) - 40 ft. min AQUA LANE - 30 ft. min. AQUA CIRCLE - 25 ft. min. PERIMETER - 30 it. PRIVATE STREET TO GARAGE DOORS - 20 fl min SIDE (Building seporotion ) - 25 fl min SITE AREAS: GROSS AREA 176,361.76 sq. ft. 4.05 acres ROW DEDICATION 9,392.45 sq. Ft. 0.21 acres NET AREA 166.969.31 sq. ft. 3.84 acres IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - 3).22 OPEN AREA - 50.62 Zoned: R -4 Guide Plan: Med Density Request to Rezone to PUD SITE DENSITY: TOTAL UNITS = 23 NET DENSITY = 23/4.05 = 5.6 UNITS /ACRE LAKE DRIVE DEDICATION NET DENSITY = 23/3.84 = 6.0 UNITS /ACRE LOT AREAS: LOT /BLK 1/1 Area 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 2/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 3/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 4/1 Area: 2.620.20 sq. Ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 5/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT/ELK 6/1 Area: 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LDT /BLK 7/1 Area 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 8/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 9/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT/ELK 10/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 11/1 Area 2,62020 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT/ELK 12/! Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 13/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 14/1 Area 1,939.80 sq. ft. 0.0445 acres LOT/ELK 15/1 Arenr 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.060! acres LOT /BLK 16/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. Ft. 0.0601 acres LOT/ELK 17/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 18/1 Area: 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LDT /BLK 19/1 Area. 2.620.20 sq. Ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 20/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 21/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 22/1 Area: 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 23/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. Ft. 0.0601 acres LDT /BLK 24/1 Area 107,385.11 sq. ft. 2.465 acres DESCRIPTION; SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON SHEET 2 of 11 LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE - DENOTES PROPOSED EASEMENTS - - - • DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK Sail Type : ZMA, ZMB = Zimmerman Fine Sand 0 w 30 60 90 SCALE BENCHMARK IN FEET Top Nut Hydrant in N.W. quadrant of the intersection of Aquo Lane and Aquo Circle. Elevation = 897.27 feet (N.G.V.D. 1929) I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota. f7wurt.�.+i.. tic Kenneth Adolf Date: 5/05/04 Reg No 12048 Designed By KA Drown Br DFD Checked By KA Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soli Testing • Environmental Services Mviwxhoeinedaancam 110560 Wayzata Boulevard Me 1 554 Third Street NW. Stile 100 A4rneapoia, Mineola 55305 -1525 Ek (Over. Mieneaota 55330 -1409 phone' (952) 546 -7601 - lax' (952) 546 -9065 phone (763) 241 -005 - tar: (952) 546 -9065 Client Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 Ietentl Street N.E. Blaine MN. 55434 17831 788.3130 Project Name/Location Mershon Townhomes 2nd Addtlon Lino Lakes, Minnesota n�mannnn 111110n7 PM Date • 5 /05/04 Sheet Trite PRELIMINARY PLAT Sheet 4 11 of 4- 18 60.00' 19 60.00' 60.00' I ili ? 20 G 1 60.00' I 21 1 V }.1Q( b 60.00' 1 60.00' iii 22 ii, -4 i. 60.00' 1 23 i 60.00' r 30' 24 wt 0 z w z Z a: ¢ ow Revisions Date: Description: 5/05/04 REVISED PLAT By: Date: Description: By: DFD 60' BUILDING SETBACKS C.S.A.H. No. 23 (LAKE DRIVE) - 40 ft. min AQUA LANE - 30 ft. min. AQUA CIRCLE - 25 ft. min. PERIMETER - 30 it. PRIVATE STREET TO GARAGE DOORS - 20 fl min SIDE (Building seporotion ) - 25 fl min SITE AREAS: GROSS AREA 176,361.76 sq. ft. 4.05 acres ROW DEDICATION 9,392.45 sq. Ft. 0.21 acres NET AREA 166.969.31 sq. ft. 3.84 acres IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - 3).22 OPEN AREA - 50.62 Zoned: R -4 Guide Plan: Med Density Request to Rezone to PUD SITE DENSITY: TOTAL UNITS = 23 NET DENSITY = 23/4.05 = 5.6 UNITS /ACRE LAKE DRIVE DEDICATION NET DENSITY = 23/3.84 = 6.0 UNITS /ACRE LOT AREAS: LOT /BLK 1/1 Area 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 2/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 3/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 4/1 Area: 2.620.20 sq. Ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 5/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT/ELK 6/1 Area: 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LDT /BLK 7/1 Area 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 8/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 9/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT/ELK 10/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 11/1 Area 2,62020 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT/ELK 12/! Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 13/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 14/1 Area 1,939.80 sq. ft. 0.0445 acres LOT/ELK 15/1 Arenr 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.060! acres LOT /BLK 16/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. Ft. 0.0601 acres LOT/ELK 17/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 18/1 Area: 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LDT /BLK 19/1 Area. 2.620.20 sq. Ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 20/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 21/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 22/1 Area: 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 23/1 Area' 2,620.20 sq. Ft. 0.0601 acres LDT /BLK 24/1 Area 107,385.11 sq. ft. 2.465 acres DESCRIPTION; SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON SHEET 2 of 11 LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE - DENOTES PROPOSED EASEMENTS - - - • DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK Sail Type : ZMA, ZMB = Zimmerman Fine Sand 0 w 30 60 90 SCALE BENCHMARK IN FEET Top Nut Hydrant in N.W. quadrant of the intersection of Aquo Lane and Aquo Circle. Elevation = 897.27 feet (N.G.V.D. 1929) I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota. f7wurt.�.+i.. tic Kenneth Adolf Date: 5/05/04 Reg No 12048 Designed By KA Drown Br DFD Checked By KA Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soli Testing • Environmental Services Mviwxhoeinedaancam 110560 Wayzata Boulevard Me 1 554 Third Street NW. Stile 100 A4rneapoia, Mineola 55305 -1525 Ek (Over. Mieneaota 55330 -1409 phone' (952) 546 -7601 - lax' (952) 546 -9065 phone (763) 241 -005 - tar: (952) 546 -9065 Client Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 Ietentl Street N.E. Blaine MN. 55434 17831 788.3130 Project Name/Location Mershon Townhomes 2nd Addtlon Lino Lakes, Minnesota n�mannnn 111110n7 PM Date • 5 /05/04 Sheet Trite PRELIMINARY PLAT Sheet 4 11 of 1 hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Xnkr sa _ Q Kenneth Adolf Date: 5/05/04 Reg No 12045 Project Name/Location Mershon Townhomes 2nd Addtlon Lino Lakes, Minnesota Date 5/06/04 • • 1 WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SE LL CONTACT ALL PIiBLIC UTILITIES. FOR LOCATIONS OF Att UNDERGROUND 6WIRES, CABLES; CONDUITS, PIPES. M,Q, SALVES, 0 OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE QIGGING.'[ HE SHALL REPAIR OR- REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEf4 DAMAGED] DURING ! CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. 30 60 „9D SCALE `T.J.NEE'T ^vw.` v» EROSION CONTROL , FENC CC S I' -C ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I I « CONCRET VALLEY _ EROSION CONTROL GUTTER FENCE • CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER a ijj Z06 TREE PROTECTION FENCE TYP. 13 3 I: : ODO J t S ;, 1 0 11 / GRADING NOTES T), 0 0 EXISTING BUILDINGS TO BE DEMOLISHED o � Y ❑ ❑ it \ ❑ / U / 8 r \ 15/ EROSION CONTROL FENCE OtET rr T i • tl ly / % 1J %/ 1 I f \` ,yam ,(0) I O \��, 12. FINIISHED,,GROUNDIt�� 00 ELEVATION ADJACENT. 0 BU,LDIMG S , BELOW FLOOR LEVA,T_ION. SL0 ROUND AWAY( ROM,,,,BUIL 11 A MI OF 6 IN 10 FEET••BEYOND 10Dt REFER TO PLAN GRADES, r rr� _ 0 \ �• ~��.� � OOO��O Y 13. CONTRCC tj-•IS RESPONSIBLE-'i0R- .GAiADING D SLOPIN THE FINISHED •,..,, GROUND!. yC1R C,E PROVIDE SMOCITPF- dc'UNLFQRM SL • , WHICH PROVIDE DRAIIAs� F 20M BUILDINGS AND.�REVEN NDING IN LOWER • -.,. "- .,,-AREAS. CONTACT" AT Inl,'li ELD ADJUSTMENTS DING PL S •iARE REBUtRED. ' •,d ' g`y' ---.. .. 14. CONTRACTOR it- RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION, PAVEMENTS AND CURB,,` AND GUTTER WITH STAID UNIFORM SLOPES WHICH PROV 0 POSITIVE ��' DRAINAGE. CONTACT ARCHI IF FIELD ADJUSTME wA e Go ;RED. •^•. 15.- 4NSTALE- A- t.(NIMHM• OF---4- •INCHES -G S .a^ -AG.GR TE-- BASE-UND AND GUTTER. "e LEGEND `'1 DENOTES BOUNDARY LDJE �- ..,: -998- * - EXISTING ,CONTOUR - - - - - - DENOTES DRAINAGE/ UTILITY EASEMENT 961 .•..l PROPO 0 0 - 000❑000000130 z•T EROSION CONTROL 511=77 FENCE P06 2�6 TI '. (3' 1 <C t DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATERMAIN DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DEMOTES EXISTING BUILDING DENOTE'S PROPOSED BUILDING DENOTES IXLSTING STORM MANHOLE/ CB DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY M4NHDEE /',4 DENOTES EXISTING HYDRANT L� 0 0 411 od D 1.00X 910.5 SOG 'GF` / PROPOSED "ROCfK'-'C'NOST�RUCTION ENTRANCE PERCENT OF GRADE •�„, PERCENT OF GRADED. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION - "-' DENOTES CURB CUT CONSTRUCTION. SAWCUT '•`•....„ BITUMINOUS FOR CURB AND GUTTER REMOVALS. RESTORE TREET TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION./ DENOTES SLAB ON GRADE DENOTES GARAGE FLOOR (ELEVATION) / Ja i EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND' ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE SITE AND INSTALL UTILITIES. 4. WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. B. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION I5 ESTABLISHED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS. • 10. if BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS 11. SWEEP ADJACENT STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REOUIREMENTS. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE: 1. INSPECT SILT FENCES AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. IMMEDIATELY REPAIR FAILED OR FAILING FENCES. 2. REPLACEMENT - FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER,.-IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. 3. SEDIMENT REMOVAL - SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. 4. ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER FABRIC IS NO LONGER REOUIRED SHALL BE GRADED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE. PREPARED, AND SEEDED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIX AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. e c' MAY 0 7 2004 1 calf OF LNG LAKES GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' WITHIN TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/ CONSTRUCTION, FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA 651- 454 -0002 OR TOLL -FREE: 1- 800 - 252 -1166. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 3. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOIL ENCOUNTERED ON THE SITE WITH EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL, DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL. STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AND GRANULAR FILL AT LOCATIONS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. 4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 6. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES, CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 7. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 8. COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS BEING GRADED TO 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION'. BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE SITE PLAN AND PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS FOR LOCATION AND LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 9. REFER TO THE ARCHITECT'S SITE PLAN FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND SITE LAYOUT. 10. REFER TO UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING AND STRUCTURE SCHEDULE. 11. THE MINIMUM GRADED SLOPE FROM EDGE OF BUILDING SHALL BE 6 INCHES IN 10 FEET. mamas Date: Descri tion: REVISED PUT B DFD Date: DescrirLion: Designed By: as Drown By: DID Cheesed By Ka Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying w Planning Soli Testing • Environmental Services wwerachoebnadeoncom 110580 Wayzata Boulevard. Stile 1 554 Third Street NW, Site 100 MmeaPOie, Mimesota 55305-1525 Elk River, Mimesota 55330 -1409 phone:1952) 546 -7601 - lax (952) 546 -9065 phone (763) 241-0108 - lax (952) 546 -9065 Client Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 latent) Street N.E. Blaine MN, 55434 17831 786 -3130 Sheet The GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Sheet 5o111 SMI Project Number: 63506 -004 ri °nom t ,I {ii III 1® 20 I I 901.7' 21 I / 901.7 GF 901.4 23 411 od D 1.00X 910.5 SOG 'GF` / PROPOSED "ROCfK'-'C'NOST�RUCTION ENTRANCE PERCENT OF GRADE •�„, PERCENT OF GRADED. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION - "-' DENOTES CURB CUT CONSTRUCTION. SAWCUT '•`•....„ BITUMINOUS FOR CURB AND GUTTER REMOVALS. RESTORE TREET TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION./ DENOTES SLAB ON GRADE DENOTES GARAGE FLOOR (ELEVATION) / Ja i EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND' ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE SITE AND INSTALL UTILITIES. 4. WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. B. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION I5 ESTABLISHED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS. • 10. if BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS 11. SWEEP ADJACENT STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REOUIREMENTS. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE: 1. INSPECT SILT FENCES AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. IMMEDIATELY REPAIR FAILED OR FAILING FENCES. 2. REPLACEMENT - FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER,.-IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. 3. SEDIMENT REMOVAL - SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. 4. ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER FABRIC IS NO LONGER REOUIRED SHALL BE GRADED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE. PREPARED, AND SEEDED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIX AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. e c' MAY 0 7 2004 1 calf OF LNG LAKES GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' WITHIN TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/ CONSTRUCTION, FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA 651- 454 -0002 OR TOLL -FREE: 1- 800 - 252 -1166. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 3. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOIL ENCOUNTERED ON THE SITE WITH EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL, DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL. STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AND GRANULAR FILL AT LOCATIONS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. 4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 6. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES, CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION, LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 7. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 8. COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS BEING GRADED TO 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION'. BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE SITE PLAN AND PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS FOR LOCATION AND LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 9. REFER TO THE ARCHITECT'S SITE PLAN FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND SITE LAYOUT. 10. REFER TO UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING AND STRUCTURE SCHEDULE. 11. THE MINIMUM GRADED SLOPE FROM EDGE OF BUILDING SHALL BE 6 INCHES IN 10 FEET. mamas Date: Descri tion: REVISED PUT B DFD Date: DescrirLion: Designed By: as Drown By: DID Cheesed By Ka Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying w Planning Soli Testing • Environmental Services wwerachoebnadeoncom 110580 Wayzata Boulevard. Stile 1 554 Third Street NW, Site 100 MmeaPOie, Mimesota 55305-1525 Elk River, Mimesota 55330 -1409 phone:1952) 546 -7601 - lax (952) 546 -9065 phone (763) 241-0108 - lax (952) 546 -9065 Client Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 latent) Street N.E. Blaine MN, 55434 17831 786 -3130 Sheet The GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Sheet 5o111 SMI Project Number: 63506 -004 1 I ' '"�,.. '���� ( 4 \\ l nJ .._"F�y r C ru \7 gre O�Vp...../..,q <?1Al �a .wg / CI 141 ....... ;is:* 111 Ex°4"'-'41 '04"x6 1.NcKEA le"^g' VAIN E °^ / N 0w •2� /lam _< sit i J CoNt4 EcT INTO Ex CIF W 8'kV "7E E, 45ea.' Nc1-'t'cASELS 22 7- _p. 2e Remove sl l E LocA-r-E as. HYD. 12" DIP WATERMAg� co • G GUILD MH -I OVER E 6a5EItvica 9 CONNECT (NTo Ex 4 "plf t/" lNcetrice 5 9 13 18 J 6 cv 24 10 11 i 2) O \) 11 O O . 12 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 ` ``` - �L 6 /,% te BL 0 /1 t,:, / 30 60 90 Ft-ET / WARNING / THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PUBLIC UTIL)TlES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES,/ CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR`s REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. Sons Date: Descri ption: yA , i \ \ 81(VALVE o -4 • v RI C Ilk JUL o92004 CITY OF Lltvv LAKE'S / / cri n 22 23 Nlft -2 24 1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UIIUTY LOCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANS AND FIELD CONDRIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY. 2. THE UTILTY CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING PIPE SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING SERVICE CONNECTIONS. 3. ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF UNO LAKES SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 4, 6" WATERMAIN SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI /AWWA CL51/A21.51 AND C104/A21.4. HYDRANTS SHALL BE THE PACER AS MANUFACTURED BY WATEROUS CO. OR APPROVED EQUAL COMPLYING WITH THE THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESIUENT SEAT MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 5. SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE 8" AND 6" PVC- SDR -35 UNLESS NOTED DIFFERENTLY. MANHOLES SHALL BE 48" DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -1642 WITH TYPE "B" COVER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TYPE OF CONNECTION WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY REQUIRED CITY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FOR CITY ACCEPTANCE. • 6. UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 955 STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698.78 AR AASHTO T -99) FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN THREE FEET OF THE GROUND SURFACE AND 1005 STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. 7. CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REQUIRES INSPECTION BY THE C11? OF LINO LAKES. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. CITY INSPECTORS MUST OBSERVE ALL WORK COMPLETED ON TOWN CENTRE DRIVE INCLUDING REMOVAL OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, EXCAVATION OF TRENCHES, PLACEMENT OF WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER, UTILITY CONNECTIONS TS)- EXISTING UNES, BACKFIWNG AND PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVE THE NECESSARY SIGNAGE FOR LANE CLOSURES. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM 70.115 MMUTCD, INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS, JANUARY 1998. ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH LANE IN EACH DIRECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. 10. THE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAWCUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn /DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SEWER, WATER AND PLUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITY'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 12. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WTH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES. 13. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE SHALL BE 6" PVC AND WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 1" COPPER. LEGEND cwt - 4 ao. 0 Nt1=Belo 4 L. <4 / Date: Description: Hy: 5/05/04 REVISED PLAT DFD I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of 16nnesota. Eenneth Adolf Date: 5/05/04 Reg No. 12048 Designed By. KA Drawn By: DFD Checked By: KA Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soli Testing • Environmental Services wwwachoetnadeeneom 110580 Wayzata Bodevard 19801 554ThM Street NW, Me 100 Wrceapoia, fdrneeota 553061525 Be fSaer, )k8060ta 65330.1409 (952) 548 -7601- tax: (952) 546 -9065 phone (763) 241 -0108 - fax (952) 548-9065 1 0 .4 • -j- H 0 DENOTES BOUNDARY UNE DENOTES DRAINAGE/ UTILITY EASEMENT DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATERMAIN DENOTES PROPOSED WATERMAIN DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED BUILDING DENOTES EXISTING STORM MANHOLE/ CB DENOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ C8 DENOTES PROPOSED FES / FES W /RIPRAP DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED HYDRANT DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVE DENOTES EXISTING HYDRANT • Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 latent) Street N.E. Blaine MN. 56434 17631 788 -3180 Protect Nerne /IJ caBeOs Marshan Townhomee 2nd Addtlon Lino Lekee. Minnesota Sheet Title UTILITY PLAN Dale 6/06/04 6 11 of SML Project Number. 63506 -004 Chen), Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 latent[ Street N.E. Blaine MN. 65434 [7831 786 -3130 Project Name(Location Mershen Townhomes 2nd Addtion Lino Lakes, Minnesota Sheet Title UTILITY PLAN t....,tiw:. Y " -'- - -- 'CONNECT NEW 6" SERVICE' ! INTO EXISTING 6" SANITARY ' SERVICE & TAP NEW 1" WATER -- -INTO EXISTING 4" DIP WATEfij SERVICE W /4` GV cT RESTORE STREET TO ORIGINAL SECTION FOR NEW SEWER /WATER SERVICES (TYP 3 LOCATIONS) G RESTORE STREET T6 �. •� ORIGINAL SECTION_, 5 z --7 ' BUILD MH -3 OVER EXISTING 8" SANITARYI RIM .0398.7 INV EX.- 886.70 INV = 887.20 (W) 12" RCP �* I4 - ..._... < �� ate. y� i CB -103. RIM =898.1 7 � -ik� CB M H -102 1� �a0 RIM=899.17 t MOVE -AND.. ELOCATE X 6" HYDRANT - 24 '' ;Z..-- .1 I (7) J 0 0 terse nt I RESTORE STREET TO - --- -- ORIGINAL SECTION i` ;:CONNECT INTOr 0.505 EXISTING STRUCTURE CONNECT INTO 9 10 • 0- TX 17" DIP WET TAP 6" DIP 14 o INTO EX 12" DIP C r 6" GV BUILD MH -1 • OVER EXISTING 8" SAA '- "- ' - -' -y RIM =8NIT99.6 RY I II I II INV EX.= 885.98 I I 10=1186.40 KT-. "'- T -"--'I 11 1 11 e4 CBMH -,01 INV =:9 ROCK CONSTRUCTION E NTRANCE e. V CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY. W 2. THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING PIPE SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING SERVICE CONNECTIONS. 24 13 18 14 19 05 N U 0. 15 w 11 0 0 N _1 12 ■ 16 0 m A 20 21 s\ I BLOC TREE IP R. ..: - (- FENCE (TYP) MH -4 RIM= 899.34 INV= 888.07 L >v 17 24 24 6" HYDRANT W /6" GV / \ \ n 22 23 J Mil - RIM 4900.04 INVg887.64 iv g 30 60 90 SCfdl IN _WARNIi FEET THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAC't`ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES r.„ FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES,/ CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER'BURIED r STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR"--""' REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. 03 3. ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF LINO LAKES SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 4. 6" WATERMAIN SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI /AWWA CL51 /A21 .51 AND 0104/421.4. HYDRANTS SHALL BE THE PACER AS MANUFACTURED BY WATEROUS CO. OR APPROVED EOUAL COMPLYING WITH THE THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESILIENT SEAT MEETING THE REOUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 5. SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE 8" AND 6" PVC- SDR -35 UNLESS NOTED DIFFERENTLY. MANHOLES SHALL BE 48" DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -1642 WITH TYPE "8" COVER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TYPE OF CONNECTION WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY REOUIRED CITY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FOR CITY ACCEPTANCE. 6. UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 955 STANDARD PROCTOR - MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698.78 OR AASHTO T -99) FROM THE PIPE "' ZONE TO WITHIN THREE FEET OF THE GROUND SURFACE AND 1005 STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. MAY 0 7 2004 7. CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REOUIRES INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. CITY INSPECTORS MUST OBSERVE ALL WORK COMPLETED ON TOWN CENTRE DRIVE INCLUDING REMOVAL OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, EXCAVATION OF TRENCHES, PLACEMENT OF WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER, UTILITY CONNECTIONS T(1 EXISTING LINES, BACKFILLING AND PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVE THE NECESSARY SIGNAGE FOR LANE CLOSURES. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE MMUTCD, INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS, JANUARY 1998. ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH LANE IN EACH DIRECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. 10. THE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAWCUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn /DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SEWER, WATER AND PLUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITY'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 12. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES. 13. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE SHALL BE 6" PVC AND WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 1" COPPER. LEGEND << 1 • H • 4 DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES DRAINAGE/ UTILITY EASEMENT DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATERMAIN DENOTES PROPOSED WATERMAIN DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED BUILDING DENOTES EXISTING STORM MANHOLE/ CB DENOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CB DENOTES PROPOSED FES / FES W /RIPRAP DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED HYDRANT DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVE DENOTES EXISTING HYDRANT Revisions Date: Description: 5/05/04 REVISED PMT DFD Date: Description: By: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. J7.e'MSSa (2 Kenneth Adolf Date; 5/05/04 Reg. No. (2048 Designed By: KA Drown By DFD Chested By: KA - ,Schnell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soli Testing • Environmental Services www.actoeknadsoncom h0580 Wayzata BoJevard, Side 1 554 Thrd Street NW, &ite 100 Mmeapaia. Mineaota 55305-1525 Ek RNer, Mmesola 55330 -1409 phone (952) 546 -7601 - tar (952) 546-9055 phone-. (763) 241 -0106 - tax. (952) 546 -9065 ty.dwg, 05/05/2004 03:29:30 PM, davidd, 1:2 8hsel. 6of 11 SMI Project Number. 63506 -004 5 6 f 7 8- 6" GV I RESTORE STREET TO - --- -- ORIGINAL SECTION i` ;:CONNECT INTOr 0.505 EXISTING STRUCTURE CONNECT INTO 9 10 • 0- TX 17" DIP WET TAP 6" DIP 14 o INTO EX 12" DIP C r 6" GV BUILD MH -1 • OVER EXISTING 8" SAA '- "- ' - -' -y RIM =8NIT99.6 RY I II I II INV EX.= 885.98 I I 10=1186.40 KT-. "'- T -"--'I 11 1 11 e4 CBMH -,01 INV =:9 ROCK CONSTRUCTION E NTRANCE e. V CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PLANS AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY. W 2. THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING PIPE SYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING SERVICE CONNECTIONS. 24 13 18 14 19 05 N U 0. 15 w 11 0 0 N _1 12 ■ 16 0 m A 20 21 s\ I BLOC TREE IP R. ..: - (- FENCE (TYP) MH -4 RIM= 899.34 INV= 888.07 L >v 17 24 24 6" HYDRANT W /6" GV / \ \ n 22 23 J Mil - RIM 4900.04 INVg887.64 iv g 30 60 90 SCfdl IN _WARNIi FEET THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAC't`ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES r.„ FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES,/ CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER'BURIED r STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR"--""' REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. 03 3. ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF LINO LAKES SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 4. 6" WATERMAIN SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI /AWWA CL51 /A21 .51 AND 0104/421.4. HYDRANTS SHALL BE THE PACER AS MANUFACTURED BY WATEROUS CO. OR APPROVED EOUAL COMPLYING WITH THE THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESILIENT SEAT MEETING THE REOUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 5. SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE 8" AND 6" PVC- SDR -35 UNLESS NOTED DIFFERENTLY. MANHOLES SHALL BE 48" DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -1642 WITH TYPE "8" COVER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TYPE OF CONNECTION WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY REOUIRED CITY INSPECTIONS NEEDED FOR CITY ACCEPTANCE. 6. UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 955 STANDARD PROCTOR - MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698.78 OR AASHTO T -99) FROM THE PIPE "' ZONE TO WITHIN THREE FEET OF THE GROUND SURFACE AND 1005 STANDARD PROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. MAY 0 7 2004 7. CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REOUIRES INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. CITY INSPECTORS MUST OBSERVE ALL WORK COMPLETED ON TOWN CENTRE DRIVE INCLUDING REMOVAL OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, EXCAVATION OF TRENCHES, PLACEMENT OF WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER, UTILITY CONNECTIONS T(1 EXISTING LINES, BACKFILLING AND PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVE THE NECESSARY SIGNAGE FOR LANE CLOSURES. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE MMUTCD, INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS, JANUARY 1998. ONE ELEVEN FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH LANE IN EACH DIRECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. 10. THE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAWCUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn /DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRIATE SEWER, WATER AND PLUMBING PERMITS FROM THE CITY'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 12. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES. 13. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE SHALL BE 6" PVC AND WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 1" COPPER. LEGEND << 1 • H • 4 DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES DRAINAGE/ UTILITY EASEMENT DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATERMAIN DENOTES PROPOSED WATERMAIN DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED BUILDING DENOTES EXISTING STORM MANHOLE/ CB DENOTES PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CB DENOTES PROPOSED FES / FES W /RIPRAP DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED HYDRANT DENOTES PROPOSED GATE VALVE DENOTES EXISTING HYDRANT Revisions Date: Description: 5/05/04 REVISED PMT DFD Date: Description: By: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. J7.e'MSSa (2 Kenneth Adolf Date; 5/05/04 Reg. No. (2048 Designed By: KA Drown By DFD Chested By: KA - ,Schnell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soli Testing • Environmental Services www.actoeknadsoncom h0580 Wayzata BoJevard, Side 1 554 Thrd Street NW, &ite 100 Mmeapaia. Mineaota 55305-1525 Ek RNer, Mmesola 55330 -1409 phone (952) 546 -7601 - tar (952) 546-9055 phone-. (763) 241 -0106 - tax. (952) 546 -9065 ty.dwg, 05/05/2004 03:29:30 PM, davidd, 1:2 8hsel. 6of 11 SMI Project Number. 63506 -004 Client Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 Iatantl Street N.E. Blaine MN. 55434 17631 788 -3130 C%D ®a'fg', c.D w e r e it 000000D 000i�1�131�� 24 1, SILT FENCE TO RUN JUST NEXT TO TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) ' f IA Z4 1 .1 x I , +Jj1 �o / ''"----...77*-- m 1---c \ IV- ^""' ` 6 - ;� p. INSTALL TRE PROSEf ON, f ,,`. L_. 1. %P -' 02 ,� n % --.. SIGNS ALONG TREE - -., 1 - e i .�,,.�/ PRESERVATION (TYP) :...;'.,r,. \ t- �. / t& `_ ` :,� `I f:J) ` <5`� — l .....„....„„...:22 ` tea- N ti�..a:" ./...-_,.., r-‘, 00\ g ,f Jr o / 01. 1) —/f/ f '•.. vs o D :t n ; 18,o 0 0 20 21 2/ 0 ! o fro ro • 4 _ J! / t 9 ^`r r.. -I TREF_LFGFNQ Number following abbreviation denotes estimated diameter in inches. three lee( above ground level. The second number (i1 ony) denotes the number of trunks of that location (1 denotes o dead tree). Number following shrubs denotes it's diameter in feet. f\• Denotes deciduous tree. CD Denotes shrub. Denotes coniferous tree. "--"—s•—• Denotes tree line. Example: BE.8.2 a»».• 4it11. A Denotes Ash AV Denotes Arbor Vitoe BF Denotes Balsom Fir BA Denotes Basswood BI Denotes Birch BE Denotes Box Elder BN Denotes Butternut BU Denotes Bush CA Denotes Catalpa CR Denotes Cedar CH Denotes Cherry CN Denotes Cottonwood DG Denotes Dogwood EL Denotes Elm FR Denotes Fruit GN Denotes Gingko H Denotes Hoekberry J FGFND q�v HC Denotes Horse Chestnut IR Denotes Ironwood JU Denotes Juniper KC Denotes Kentucky Coffee LI Denotes Lilac LO Denotes Locust M Denotes Maple MP Denotes Mugo Pine 0 Denotes Ook PI Denotes Pine PO Denotes Poplar RO Denotes Russion Olive SM Denotes Silver Maple SP Denotes Spruce TD Denotes Tree Deciduous TE Denotes Tree Evergreen WA Denotes Walnut W1 Denotes Willow Denotes tree removal Denotes tree preserved ` Denotes tree preservation limits MAY 0772004 CITY OF LUNNO LAKES 0 c `W 30 60 90 SCALE IN FEET Rvisions Date Description: 5/05/04 REVISED PUT By: Date: Description: By: DFD 1 hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. XX, Mk-O Kenneth Adolf Date: 5/05/04 Reg No 12048 Designed By KA Drawn By DID Checked By KA ,�,_Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering a Surveying a Planning Soil Testing o Environmental Services wweechoekmadeoncom 110560 Wayzata boulevard, Site 1 554 Third Street NW. Stile 100 Mmeapoks, Mmesota 55305 -1525 Bk fever, Minnesota 55330 -1409 phone, (952) 546 -7601 - fax (952) 546-9065 phone' (763) 241 -0108 - fax (952) 546-9065 Project Name /Location Morahan Townhomes 2nd Addtion Lino Lakes, Minnesota Sheet TNe TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Date. 5/05/04 Sheet 7 11 SMI Project Number: 63506 -004 13 14 15/x. / / , ,,... Jr o / 01. 1) —/f/ f '•.. vs o D :t n ; 18,o 0 0 20 21 2/ 0 ! o fro ro • 4 _ J! / t 9 ^`r r.. -I TREF_LFGFNQ Number following abbreviation denotes estimated diameter in inches. three lee( above ground level. The second number (i1 ony) denotes the number of trunks of that location (1 denotes o dead tree). Number following shrubs denotes it's diameter in feet. f\• Denotes deciduous tree. CD Denotes shrub. Denotes coniferous tree. "--"—s•—• Denotes tree line. Example: BE.8.2 a»».• 4it11. A Denotes Ash AV Denotes Arbor Vitoe BF Denotes Balsom Fir BA Denotes Basswood BI Denotes Birch BE Denotes Box Elder BN Denotes Butternut BU Denotes Bush CA Denotes Catalpa CR Denotes Cedar CH Denotes Cherry CN Denotes Cottonwood DG Denotes Dogwood EL Denotes Elm FR Denotes Fruit GN Denotes Gingko H Denotes Hoekberry J FGFND q�v HC Denotes Horse Chestnut IR Denotes Ironwood JU Denotes Juniper KC Denotes Kentucky Coffee LI Denotes Lilac LO Denotes Locust M Denotes Maple MP Denotes Mugo Pine 0 Denotes Ook PI Denotes Pine PO Denotes Poplar RO Denotes Russion Olive SM Denotes Silver Maple SP Denotes Spruce TD Denotes Tree Deciduous TE Denotes Tree Evergreen WA Denotes Walnut W1 Denotes Willow Denotes tree removal Denotes tree preserved ` Denotes tree preservation limits MAY 0772004 CITY OF LUNNO LAKES 0 c `W 30 60 90 SCALE IN FEET Rvisions Date Description: 5/05/04 REVISED PUT By: Date: Description: By: DFD 1 hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. XX, Mk-O Kenneth Adolf Date: 5/05/04 Reg No 12048 Designed By KA Drawn By DID Checked By KA ,�,_Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering a Surveying a Planning Soil Testing o Environmental Services wweechoekmadeoncom 110560 Wayzata boulevard, Site 1 554 Third Street NW. Stile 100 Mmeapoks, Mmesota 55305 -1525 Bk fever, Minnesota 55330 -1409 phone, (952) 546 -7601 - fax (952) 546-9065 phone' (763) 241 -0108 - fax (952) 546-9065 Project Name /Location Morahan Townhomes 2nd Addtion Lino Lakes, Minnesota Sheet TNe TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Date. 5/05/04 Sheet 7 11 SMI Project Number: 63506 -004 Sheet Title: LANDSCAPE PLAN • /1 `IF P /P A -3 F -2 Erp ^i?r V ir1 - H : 1 Aismiresi 4.0-74raffizi si' rdhii am.. 11111 _ :!1!_� iP,1�' 1,x:7 �= r ,. •i t:A Era= w 11.!! i■ii hill i■II Mail Sr r ; D.w DDD a se e Q DD ❑¢C1YTEf`f3D`QO MI LANDSCAPE NOTES • ALL LANDSCAPE TREES, SHRUB, GROUNDCOVERS AND. SOD AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. • SOD AND IRRIGATE ALL DISTURBED AREAS. • ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS WITH PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE IRRIGATED. qi • REFER TO LANDSCAPE DETAIL SHEET FOR GENERAL PLANTING NOTES, ,I IRRIGATION NOTES, PLANTING DETAILS Ij • REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR GRADES AND EROSION CONTROL • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SHOP DRAWING OF IRRIGATION PLAN TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. - -• ALL SHRUB BEDS AND TO RECIEVE 3" SHREDDED HARWOOD MULCH, AND TREES TO RECIEVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MUCLH. • REMOVE WIRING, TWINE OR ROPES AND BURLAP FROM THE TOP AND SIDES 000E30(3 DDpDpC `�\ ' OF THE ROOT BALI. FOR BALLED AND BURLAPPED PLANTS. o `1: i • REMOVE CONTAINERS AND CUT CIRCLING ROOTS IF PLANTS ARE CONTAINER .i CROWN. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ I 10 SODS I 0 21 0 0 O I10 110 • HEAVY COMMERCIAL GRADE EDGING SHALL BE USED AROUND THE PERIMETER I OF ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER MASSINGS IT • ALL TREES NOT IN PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE MULCH RINGS 3' IN DIA. it 7371- • IF PLANTS ARE TO BE PRUNED, BRANCHES SHALL BE PRUNED AT THE BRANCH BARK RIDGE, NOT FLUSH WITH THE BARK. i 1 • t • 0-1 y ti 11 Cs-3 SUGGESTED PLANT SCHEDULE CODE QTY COMMON NAME /LATIN NAME ❑ D 0,1 1, • SIZE ROOT REMARKS A 15 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER Acer x freemonii 'Jeffersred' CAL. AND FULL CROWN B 10 AUTUMN APPLAUSE WHITE ASH 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER Froxinus americana 'Autumn Applause' CAL. AND FULL CROWN C 6 BLACK ASH 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER Froxinus nigro CAL. AND FULL CROWN D 9 RED OAK 2 B &B STRAIGHT LEADER Ouercus rubra CAL. AND FULL CROWN E 11 HARVEST GOLD CRABAPPLE 1.5" 8 &B MULTI -STEM TREEFORM Betulo x 'Crimson Frost' CAL. AND FULL CROWN F 13 THORNLESS HAWTHORN 1.5" B &B MULTI -STEM TREEFORM Croteogus crusgalli vor. inermis CAL. AND FULL CROWN G 15 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Picea glouco 'densata' HT H 10 COLORADO SPRUCE 6' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Piceo pungens HT I 18 AUSTRIAN PINE 6' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Pinus nigro HT OUANTIT ES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ST L• A 1 1:5 18 MULCH DEPTH SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF FOUR INCHES, AND SHALL BE KEPT AT LEAST TWO INCHES AWAY FROM THE STEM OF THE TREES. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO THE SITE CAUSED. BY THE PLANTING OPERATION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. ALL PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE FERTILIZER AS FOLLOWS: •0 -0 -20 GRANULAR FERTILIZER APPLIED AT THE TIME OF PLANTING AT A RATE OF 12 OZ PER 2.5 CALIPER INCHES OF TREE AND 6 OZ PER SHRUB. •10 -0 -10 FERTILIZER APPLIED THE FOLLOWING SPRING AT SAME RATE. OM PLANT LEGEND OVERSTORY DECIDUDOUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREES CONIFER TREES SHRUBS \GROUNDCOVER AVG. 2.5" DIA. AVG. 1.5" DIA. • AVG. HT 6' MAY 0 7 2004 n CST' OF LINO LAKES .1111/".}7. VO inn 0 DOS c 30 w 60 AVG. HT 18" 90 SCALE IN FEET WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. Visions Date: Description: By: Date: Description: By: f hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Scott Bilben Dale: 5/05/04 Reg No 40647 By 569 Drown By SAY Checked By: 0866 Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soft Testing a Environmental Services wwwechoesmadeon.com [10580 Wayzata Boulevard, Site 1 554 Third Street NY Site 100 {Amerind*, Minnesota 55305 -1525 Bk River, Minnesota 55330 -1409 Phone. (952) 54E -7601 - tax, (952) 546 -8065 phone: (763) 241-0108 - lax: (952) 546 -9065 Ghent Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 letanti Street N.E. Blaine MN. 55434 17831 788 -3130 U Project Name /Loca5on Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addtlon Lino Lakes, Minnesota es 6- 1 Dale! 5 /05/04 Sheet: 8 11 01 SMI Project Number: 63506 -004 Z W_ tL 1117"1- 51.05- tr1•04-PahL g.YZ-• eLOWM6,21. P-14,er stov- belicw1914,4 rf •■••-•-•,=•••- = • • - '• •- , • • • •_ - • -• ■ 1 RECEIVED JUL 0 7 2004 CITY OF LINO LAKES " : : ".• • . . qi..) CHWIETERS OME ESIGN CONTZACTOP RESIDENCT FOR 5Y. 414 73' 14,470'5 '•?,'" *AO/ /7Wt-• I DR..A15,1 BY- 15S- =1 A 11 i i " - 1 1 :1 11 ',1 11 :1 --7" -=-4----Inr 11-11---Ir - r----:t---1Thr---ir--1H1---Hr -71-11-1 n _J , = • • - '• •- , • • • •_ - • -• ■ 1 RECEIVED JUL 0 7 2004 CITY OF LINO LAKES " : : ".• • . . qi..) CHWIETERS OME ESIGN CONTZACTOP RESIDENCT FOR 5Y. 414 73' 14,470'5 '•?,'" *AO/ /7Wt-• I DR..A15,1 BY- 15S- iv • • • AGENDA ITEM 5.D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul F. Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: July 14, 2004 TOPIC: Variance to allow a 3.9 -foot side yard setback for an attached accessory structure (garage) where 5.0 feet is required. Curt and Kelly Monson — Bacchus Homes, Inc. 6396 Langer Lane BACKGROUND November 13, 2003 the City of Lino Lakes issued a single - family home — new construction building permit to Bacchus Homes, Inc. for 6396 Langer Lane (Lot 22 Block 2 of Clearwater Creek 5th Addition). The survey submitted with the building permit application on November 5, 2003 indicated the required 5 -foot side setback for the attached accessory structure (garage) as is required by the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. The permit was issued based on this proof of compliance with the zoning code requirements. The City of Lino Lakes requires all new construction to submit an "As- Built" survey verifying that the structures are built to the approved specifications. In the case of the subject property, the "As- Built" survey indicated that the attached accessory structure (garage) had actually been built to a 3.9 -foot side setback rather than the 5 -foot side setback as required by the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is now requesting that a variance of 1.1 feet be granted from the ordinance requirements. ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning The following table summarizes the zoning and land use of the subject property, as well as surrounding properties: • • • Bacchus Variance July 14, 2004 page 2 Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Subject Property Low Density, Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) PDO (Planned Development Overlay) North Low Density, Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) PDO (Planned Development Overlay) East Low Density, Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) PDO (Planned Development Overlay) South Low Density, Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) PDO (Planned Development Overlay) West Low Density, Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) PDO (Planned Development Overlay) Setback Requirements Section 6, Subdivision 1 of the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance requires that a 5- foot side setback be provided for all accessory structures. The applicant was issued permits for the subject site based on a survey submitted with the building permit application that met this requirement. Construction of the single - family dwelling was completed and the "As- Built" survey of the property indicated that the 5 -foot setback was no longer being met. Specifically, a variance to allow a 3.9 -foot side setback where 5 feet is required is now being requested by the builder post construction. The property line for which the setback variance is being requested adjoins a community open space and thus the distance between dwellings will not be significantly reduced. OPTIONS 1. Recommend approval of the proposed Variance. 2. Recommend denial of the approved Variance. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this Variance request. This review is based on the following plan submittals: Building Permit Number 0301259 November 5, 2003 Certificate of Survey (As- Built) June 24, 2004 • Memorandum To: From: Date: Re: Planning and Zoning Board members Paul F. Bengtson, Associate Planner July 14, 2004 Agenda Item 5.D. — 6396 Langer Lane Variance Application The following exhibits were mistakenly omitted from the July 14, 2004 Planning and Zoning Board meeting packets. Exhibit Number 1 — Exhibit Number 2 — • The survey submitted for the building permit The `As- Built' survey submitted with the variance application. EXH ‘13%-r 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for • Denotes Wood Stake Set BACCHUS HOMES, INC. For Excavation Only- Denotes Surface Drainage ( ) Denotes Proposed Elevation x Denotes Existing Elevation 929.6 Top of Block Elevation 0 House 928.2 Top of Block Elevation ® Garage 927.8 Garage Floor Elevation 924.7 Top of Block 0 Lookout Window Sill 921.5 Lowest Floor Elevation Type of Building: A Wood Frame House Benchmark: T.N.H. 0 Lot 15, Block 3 Elevation = 927.81 ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND FLOOR ELEVATIONS MUST BE VERIFIED BY BUILDER. LOWEST POSSIBLE OPENING ELEVATION = 924.5 PER GRADING PLAN. 921.9 x 921.1 Scale: 1" = 30' • Denotes iron pipe monument found, marked "RLS 10947" The orientation of this Bearing System is based upon the recorded plat of CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION. 924.1 Proposed Contours per Grading Plan 91'x` . Px%/2/2� G\ \ \9A° 1 926.0 § ��], '926 f 92<0 6 ,(J 924.7 / 924.0 922.7 91' \ -- 92� ryktil 9 ti� 11- IV -�b03 \_ 926.Y0 ` 5) > fig' // 9/ o</ •'/5 Q// ;�43' • ;/ • (Proposed Additional .326.3 Contour Proposed House (921. rot 1, (927.8) (garage) ' 'sue 6' • Top of Hub Tr Oev.= 927.11 ED 926.0 26 csox C 925.66 A O o \ 'j% `f0 '0 • 925. JI Top of Hub lev. =925.34 Lot 22, Block 2, CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota. CATV 924.77 Gas CI Marker .{ .{ f� 6°' 0 J /JYOc 925.09 t Q (�t���iiiy��` 925.5 ` D �`v nci tp D T/C 924.99 -p iis4? MIDWEST Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. 710 East River Road. Anoka, MN. 55303 Ph. 763-712-9099 Fax: 763-712-9055 Job No. 03 -377 Book —Page DCF Aced File 03 -377 ©2003— Midwest Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. — All Rights Reserved. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was' prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. and No certification whatsoever is extended to subsequent owners, mortgagees or title insurers, un less this survey has been redated for this purpose by the surveyor. Dated this 3rd day of November 2003. By Registration No. 25343 es E. Napier - Minh ads to Licensed Land Surveyor Asbuilt Doted this day of , 20 _ . • g sA!-d l 81X" 2. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Denotes Wood Stake Set For Excavation Only —y Denotes Denotes Denotes ( x 929.8 929.E 929.0 • 924.9 921.7 921.5 Top of Top of Garage Top of Lowest Surface Drainage Proposed Elevation Existing Elevation for BACCHUS HOMES, INC. Block Elevation @ House Block Elevation @ Garage Floor Elevation Block ' Lookout Window Sill Floor Elevation Type of Building: A Wood Frame House Benchmark: T.N.H. ® Lot 15, Block 3 Elevation = 927.81 x(§-0-5 Denotes asbuilt elevation tl --@— 921.1 Scale: 1" = 30' • Denotes iron pipe monument found, marked "RLS 10947". The orientation of this Bearing System is based upon the recorded plot of CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION. \\ k • p ‘3d■ / \y/ ry 4 %�\ /L �f I 92 9 x x -- 0� 41,b0 C..,924..5) v / ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND FLOOR ELEVATIONS MUST BE VERIFIED BY BUILDER. LOWEST POSSIBLE OPENING ELEVATION = 924.5 PER GRADING PLAN. Proposed Contours per Grading Plan V24. /) k ?1 \6 T, O,Y A, •us oo� Proposed House (921.5) • 1 \ i Q °r/ \h / / >LEC. i / y 0 EE • (garage) (927.8) o� ti ?X �� / .s » b., de----/ / / , ro / / I CBOX Oo Lot 22, Block 2, CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota. 924.77 T/C 924.99 -p 0 9 T$ 925./C ,09 �• (10 /C 925.66 moo MIDWEST Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. 710 East River Road. Anoko, MN. 55303 Ph. 763 - 712 -9099 Fax: 763- 712 -9055 Job No, 03 -377 Book —Page DCF Acod File 03 -377 © 2003—Midwest Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. — All Rights Reserved. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that l am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. and No certification whatsoever is extended to >ESubsequent owners, mortgagees or title insurers, unless this survey has been sedated for this purpose by the surveyor. Dated this 3rd day off r November""" 2003. By Registration No 25343 James E. Napier Minnesota Licensed Land Surveyor Asbuilt ✓ Dated this 28th day of May 2004. • • AGENDA ITEM VI. A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: July 14, 2004 TOPIC: Discussion: Temporary Signage BACKGROUND Recall that the P & Z held a special meeting on June 16th to discuss temporary signage. We sent letters to 40+ businesses inviting them to the meeting. The letter encouraged them to pass the invitation to others as well. Representatives of two business attended along with three real estate agents. The real estate people were concerned about the potential for prohibiting "for sale" and "open house" signs along roads. The current ordinance exempts such signs from regulation. Up until then, the discussion never included changing the ordinance to regulate real estate signs of this type. Staff would recommend we not pursue this. Such signs are in place for a matter of hours or days, are very small, and only rarely are there enough of them in one location as to constitute an eyesore. They should not be in a road right of way, however. The two business owners raised certain issues, which are listed below as bullet points. I have added some brief comments for each. • Temporary signs are important for grand openings and special sales. Temporary signs are very effective. A real estate representative stated that signs produce better results than other forms of advertising. There is no doubt that signage is important and necessary. We need to address how much signage, where, and for how long? • Signs are not the only thing that affect appearance of a business. There is no doubt that the general appearance of a business involves many things, only one of which is signage. This does not dilute the importance of signage. • The current ordinance does not define "banner ". Clearly, the existing sign ordinance does not address the issues in a satisfactory manner. That is why this issue is being discussed. Definitions can and should be amended. Banners are a form of temporary signage and should be included in the definition of temporary signs. • Please remember that we are not limiting the discussion to banners only. We are considering all types of temporary signage. It is possible that certain requirements would apply to banners specifically. • The current ordinance does not address window signage. If the P & Z desires to address window signs, that is possible. • If real estate agents can put up a sign without a permit, why not others? Such signs are in place for a matter of hours or days, are very small, and only rarely are there enough of them in one location as to constitute an eyesore. • Tobacco companies require certain signage by contract. We will need to learn more about such contractual requirements to see just what they require. Staff has initiated some research into this question. Issues to Discuss Scope: Just what types of temporary signage do we want to regulate? Definitions: temporary signs, banners and other types Allowable location(s) for temporary signage Allowable size: total area and, if temporary signs should be included in the maximum amount of signage allowed Allowable time limit, if any, for temporary signs Enforcement: It is unlikely that 100% enforcement will occur, but that should not stop the City from having the tools to prevent and resolve unsightly situations when possible. Ultimately, the goal is to prepare amendments to the existing sign ordinance . We are not considering a total revamp of the sign ordinance: a fare more extensive project. For now, we are looking at issues relevant to temporary signage. Staff has no specific ordinance recommendations at this time. Drafting ordinance changes will progress as the discussion continues. • • MEMORANDUM DATE: July 9, 2004 TO: Planning & Zoning Board FROM: Michael Grochala RE: 2004 -2005 City Council Goals Agenda Item VI.B In May of 2004 the City Council held a goal setting session to determine the High Priority Goals for 2004 -2005. The council at their June 14, 2004 meeting adopted the seven goals. Each of the goals includes a specific Management Action Plan (MAPs) for pursuing implementation. The MAPs identify specific performance, objectives, schedules, methodologies, and action plans. The also identify operating and capital budget requirements. The goals and their respective MAPs are attached. Implementation of six of the goals falls within the responsibility of the Community Development Department. It is likely that the Planning and Zoning Board will be heavily involved in several of the key action steps identified for implementation. J: \Staff Reports\Planning & Zoning\2004 \7 -14 -04 Council goals.dot • GOALS AND MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN 2004 - 2005 • 1. Complete Town Center and YCMA. a. Calendar Year 2004: (1) Objective: Complete predevelopment phase (2) Key Action Steps: • Finalize City /YMCA Development Agreement • Finalize funding sources for city share of YMCA construction and improvements • Complete sale of city land to Hartford • Finalize EDA/Hartford Development Agreement by August • Finalize operations and maintenance agreement for Woods Edge • Approve Final Plat • Order public improvements by October (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: City Staff Key Contributors: Springsted, Inc. Kennedy & Graven SEH Hartford Group YMCA City Council /EDA (4) Budget Guidelines: Costs of Woods Edge predevelopment phase borne by developer. City costs associated with YMCA are outside of annual budget. b. Calendar Year 2005: (1) Objective: Enter development phase (2) Key Action Steps: • Begin construction of public improvements, including Lake Drive • Approve Phase 1 development of Woods Edge, begin construction J: \Staff Reports\Planning & Zoning\2004 \7 -14 -04 Council goals.dot • • Approve YMCA site and building plans, begin construction • Market Woods Edge • • (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: City Staff Key Contributors: SEH YMCA Hartford Group City Council (4) Budget Guidelines: Additional marketing dollars may be needed. Note: Council indicated a preference that staff should pursue some non - franchise businesses to be included in the Town Center development. 2. Complete Visioning Process for the Benchmark Site on 35E and begin Master Planning for the balance of 35E Corridor. a. Calendar Year 2004: (1) Objective: Initiate a citizen - driven master plan process for the Benchmark site and begin review of 35E Corridor (2) Key Action Steps: • Develop action plan for the visioning process • Identify key constituents and involve citizens in visioning process • Visit precedent communities • Conduct market research • Begin AUAR • Communicate progress to the citizens • Explore funding sources for expanded AUAR • Explore funding sources for 35E bridge reconstruction (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: Benchmark Community Builder Collaborative Key Contributors: City Staff Citizens and key stakeholders (4) Budget Guidelines: Currently pursuing a Met Council Grant, without the grant city may need to budget for 35E Corridor AUAR for 2005 J: \Staff Reports\Planning & Zoning\2004 \7 -14 -04 Council goals.dot • • b. Calendar Year 2005: (1) Objective: Complete Master Plan and begin predevelopment phase (2) Key Action Steps: • Complete AUAR of 35E corridor • Complete Master Plan of Benchmark Site • City development approvals • Develop a marketing plan (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: Benchmark Community Builder Collaborative Key Contributors: City Staff Citizens City Council Advisory Boards (4) Budget Guidelines: Potential need to budget for AUAR for 35E Corridor 3. Review Comp Plan and adopt changes, if needed. a. Calendar Year 2004: (1) Objective: To evaluate the status and effectiveness of the City's 2001 Comprehensive Plan (2) Key Action Steps: • Prepare Review of Plan • Identify possible modifications (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: Community Development Staff Key Contributors: TKDA Advisory Boards City Council (4) Budget Guidelines: Primarily Staff Time, Some engineering related expenses for Transportation and Utility reviews. J: \Staff Reports\Planning & Zoning\2004 \7 -14 -04 Council goals.dot • b. Calendar Year 2005: (1) Objective: If necessary, Update Plan (2) Key Action Steps: • Select Consultant • Develop Participatory Process (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: Consultant, Community Development Staff Key Contributors: Staff Consultant Advisory Boards City Council (4) Budget Guidelines: City staff time. Consultant need and cost dependent on Scope of Work 4. Resolve the Charter Road Reconstruction Limitation provision with the City's Charter Commission. a. Calendar Year 2004: (1) Objective: Define a public improvement construction and financing process that establishes a sound, fiscally responsible method of maintaining the City's infrastructure while minimizing impacts to Lino Lakes residents and businesses. (2) Key Action Steps: • Prepare Pavement Management Program • Review and Approval by Council and Charter Commission • Identify implementation issues and determine need for any Charter modifications (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: City Staff Key Contributors: TKDA Springsted Inc. City Council Charter Commission (4) Budget Guidelines: City staff time. Engineering included in 2004 . General Engineering Budget. Will need to identify costs for J: \Staff Reports\Planning & Zoning\2004 \7 -14 -04 Council goals.dot • • Springsted involvement b. Calendar Year 2005: (1) Objective:Implement Pavement Management Program (2) Key Action Steps: • Resolve any potential conflicts with Charter • Prepare Phase I improvement projects (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: City staff Key Contributors: City Council Charter Commission (4) Budget Guidelines: Dependent on scope of program. 5. Finish the trail system — construct what is identified in the City Master Plan for Parks and Trails. a. Calendar Year 2004: (1) Objective No. 1: Complete Birch Street Trail from Blackduck Drive to Pheasant Hills Drive (2) Key Action Steps: • Obtain necessary approvals from Anoka County • Plans and Specs — (Prepare, Distribute, Receive, and Award Bid) • Supervise Construction Work (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: Rick DeGardner Key Contributors: TKDA to prepare Plans and Specs (4) Budget Guidelines: Approved 2004 Park Board Goal — Dedicated Parks Fund (1) Objective No. 2: Complete Trail Connections at Birch Park and Sunrise Park. (2) Key Action Steps: J:\StaffReports\Planning & Zoning\2004 \7 -14 -04 Council goals.dot • • • (3) • Plans and Specs — (Prepare, Distribute, Receive, and Award Bid) • Supervise Construction Work Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: Rick DeGardner Key Contributors: TKDA to prepare Plans and Specs (4) Budget Guidelines: Approved 2004 Park Board Goal — Dedicated Parks Fund b. Calendar Year 2005: (1) Objective: Continue Completing Trail System (2) Key Action Steps: • Prioritize Trail Development Projects • Allocate Funds for Trail Development • Identify Specific Trail Projects for 2005 Based On Available Funds • Prepare Plans and Specs, Send Out Bids, Receive Bids, Award Bid • Supervise Construction Work. (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: Rick DeGardner Key Contributors: City Council TKDA to prepare Plans and Specs (4) Budget Guidelines: City Council Discretion, General Fund and/or Dedicated Parks Fund. 6. Adopt a City image, which identifies and presents a positive reflection of the community. a. Calendar Year 2004: (1) Objective: Determine what Council wants to project as the city's image, define the target audience and determine the purpose of the message (2) Key Action Steps: • Develop an action plan once the objective becomes focused. J: \Staff Reports\Planning & Zoning\2004 \7 -14 -04 Council goals.dot • • (3) • Establish a long range plan and funding sources for redeveloping blighted and substandard areas, with particular emphasis on the entrances to the city. • Address ways to provide enforcement of city zoning ordinances regarding outside storage of vehicles and equipment, and temporary signage Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: City Staff Key Contributors: City Council Advisory Boards (4) Budget Guidelines: Provide for in Community Development budget b. Calendar Year 2005: (1) Objective: Implement Action Plan (2) Key Action Steps: • Establish and enhance gateways to the city (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: City Staff Key Contributors: City Council Advisory Boards (4) Budget Guidelines: May have to budget additional dollars in economic development budget 7. Pursue a diversified tax base for the Lino Lakes community. a. Calendar Year 2004: (1) Objective: Encourage balance of land uses, growth of existing businesses and new development (2) Key Action Steps: • Implement 2004 EDAC Action Plan (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: City Staff Key Contributors: City Council Advisory Boards J: \Staff Reports\Planning & Zoning\2004 \7 -14 -04 Council goals.dot • (3) Budget Guidelines: Dependent on individual project scope • • b. Calendar Year 2005: (1) Objective: Encourage balance of land uses, growth of existing businesses and new development (2) Key Action Steps: • Implement 2005 Action Plan (3) Lead party and Key Contributors: Lead party: City Staff Key Contributors: City Council Advisory Boards (4) Budget Guidelines: Dependent on individual project scope J: \Staff Reports\Planning & Zoning\2004 \7 -14 -04 Council goals.dot MEMORANDUM DATE: July 9, 2004 TO: Planning & Zoning Board FROM: Michael Grochala RE: Schwan's Relocation Agenda Item VI.0 Schwan's has indicated they are interested in relocating their existing facility on Lake Drive and expanding into a new facility in the Marshan Lake Industrial Park. Building: The initial building size will be 10- 15,000 sq. ft., with expansion capacity up to 17- 20,000 sq. ft. Approximately 1/4 of the facility will be office, and the remainder will be warehouse /storage, including a freezer component. The facility will have two dock doors and four overhead drive -in doors. An above ground 18,000 - gallon propane storage tank will be located on site. Delivery Trucks: The site will need to accommodate approximately 14 — 40 Home Service Delivery Trucks when fully developed. These vehicles have 2 axels are approximately 18 -22 feet in length. Cab and box are permanently attached. Site Activity: • This facility is a distribution depot serving the north metro area. From this location Schwans will deliver products to residential customers. Products are delivered by semi trailer, stored then loaded on Home Service Delivery Trucks. • Product deliveries to the Home Service Facility are made by one semi trailer truck 2 -3 times per week. These vehicles typically make deliveries in the evening hours. • When on site, the semi tractors and trailers are backed up to the loading dock or staged for unloading which takes between 3 and 4 hours. When unloading is complete the semi tractor and trailer leave the site. S: \Planning & Zoning Board \Packets\Packets - 2004\July 14, 2004 \Item 6C - Schwan's Relocation.doc • Home Service Delivery Trucks are loaded inside the overhead drive -in doors each day, Sunday — Thursday, between midnight and 6:00 AM. When loaded with product for the next day's delivery, the Home Service Delivery Trucks are parked on the site and plugged in to maintain appropriate refrigeration levels. Home deliveries take place between 7:30 AM and 9:30 PM. The majority of trucks are parked on site over the weekend, with a small number of home deliveries made on Saturday. • Trucks on site are either being unloaded, loaded, refueled or staged for departure on delivery routes. Schwan's is seeking guidance as to compliance with the city's existing ordinance for delivery vehicle parking /exterior storage. Code Analysis Warehousing and distribution facilities are a permitted use in the LI, Light Industrial District and subject to administrative review and approval. However, the exterior parking of delivery trucks has raised the question of whether this should be considered Exterior Storage. While exterior storage is a permitted Conditional Use within the LI, Light Industrial District, certain requirements would preclude exterior storage on the proposed Schwan's site. Specifically the ordinance stipulates that the property cannot abut I -35W or I -35E. Section 1., Subdivision 2.B of the Zoning Ordinance defines Exterior Storage /Storage Yards as follows: An outside area where equipment, vehicles, trailers, or material relating to the principal use of a parcel of land is stored. This includes semi - trucks and trailers. The stored items are not for sale or display but are used in the everyday operation of the principal use. Also referred to as "outdoor storage." Outdoor sales lots are not outdoor storage but are distinct uses regulated by this ordinance. Section 3., Subdivision 4.P.2 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Exterior Storage in Commercial, Industrial and Public /semi - public Zoning Districts stipulates the following: a. Exterior Storage. Exterior storage shall be governed by the respective zoning district in which such use is located. b. Screening. All exterior storage shall be screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties and public streets except for the following: 1) Merchandise being displayed for sale in accordance with zoning district requirements. S: \Planning & Zoning Board\Packets\Packets - 2004 \July 14, 2004 \Item 6C - Schwan's Relocation.doc 2) Materials and equipment currently being used for construction on the premises. c. Within an industrial zoning district, the exterior storage of semi- trailers accessory to the principal use may be allowed by conditional use permit according to Section 8, Subd. 1 and Subd. 2. Semi - trailers connected to semi - tractors queuing for loading or unloading shall be considered truck parking and be exempt from the outdoor storage conditional use permit. Section 8., Subdivision 1.I.5 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Conditional Use for Open and Outdoor Storage stipulates the following: Open and outdoor storage (not outdoor sales lots) as an accessory use provided that: a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring uses, residential zoning districts, and public rights -of- way per Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. b. Storage area is fenced in a manner approved by the City. c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the City Council. d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of this Ordinance or other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this Ordinance and not in front yards. f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, including land in a neighboring city. "Abutting" includes across a street. "Abutting" does not include properties that touch only corner to corner. g. The property shall not abut I -35W or I -35E. h. The storage area shall not abut a school or a public park. i. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. S:\Planning & Zoning Board\Packets\Packets - 2004\July 14, 2004 \Item 6C - Schwan's Relocation.doc J• Staff Opinion Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. The issue of parking trucks outdoors in commercial and industrial areas and the applicability of exterior storage requirements has been raised several times in the past. The 2003 Zoning Ordinance update did provide some additional clarification to the issue. However, the discussion and modifications made related primarily to semi - trucks and trailers. While the definition of exterior storage includes "vehicles" the exterior storage requirements in Section 3., Subdivision 4.P.2 states in part that "Semi- trailers connected to semi - tractors queuing for loading or unloading shall be considered truck parking and be exempt from the outdoor storage conditional use permit ". Therefore it is our opinion that the proposed Schwan's delivery trucks would not be considered exterior storage. However, any site development for the proposed use would need to comply with screening requirements. Schwan's has indicated they are working on a site design that screens the parking area from I -35W. The City's Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) discussed the issue at its July 1, 2004 meeting and recommended support for the Schwan's project in the Marshan Lake Industrial Park with proper screening. Staff would like comments from the board on this issue. We anticipate the need to review and revise the ordinance language to avoid any further ambiguity. Attachment 1. Site Location S: \Planning & Zoning Board\Packets\Packets - 2004 \July 14, 2004\ltem 6C - Schwan's Relocation.doc