Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/11/2004 P&Z Packet• CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, August 11, 2004 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 14, 2004 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. Final Plat for Marshan Estates, 5 -lot residential subdivision located adjacent to Marshan Lane — Michael Grochala B. Final Plat for Crystal Cove, North Suburban Development, SW corner of Lake Drive and 79th Street — Jeff Smyser C. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for Conditional Use Permit /Planned Unit Development/ Preliminary Plat for Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addition, a 23 -unit medium density residential development, NE corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane — Jeff Smyser D. Recommendation on Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan — Jeff Schoenbauer, Brauer & Associates E. Preliminary Plat for Fox Den Acres, Royal Oaks Realty, a 50 -acre development south of Birch Street and east of Deerwood Lane, at the east end of Fox Road — Jeff Smyser VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS • A. Temporary Signage update — Jeff Smyser VII. ADJOURN • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE July 14, 2004 TIME STARTED 6:31 P.M. TIME ENDED : 9:45 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Hyden, Lane, Pogalz, Rafferty, Root, and Tralle. MEMBERS ABSENT : None. STAFF PRESENT : Jeff Smyser, Michael Grochala, Paul Bengtson and James Studenski I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Rafferty called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:31 p.m., July 14, 2004. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JUNE 9, 2004 Mr. Tralle made a MOTION approve the June 9, 2004 Minutes and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Rafferty declared open mike open at 6:33 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike Chair Rafferty declared open mike closed at 6:34 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 14, 2004 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. Introduce Paul Bengtson, Associate Planner Mr. Smyser introduced Paul Bengtson, the new Associate Planner. The Board welcomed Mr. Bengtson. B. Final Plat, Elm St. Estates (formerly known as Lakeview Estates), Gerald Schultz, SE corner of Elm St. and Lakeview Dr. Staff stated the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Lakeview Estates with Resolution 03 -120 on September 8, 2003. Apparently, there already is a Lakeview Estates in Anoka County, so the applicant changed the name to Elm Street Estates. Under the subdivision ordinance, the final plat needs P & Z review prior to City Council approval. Staff stated this project involves an existing residential lot with one existing house (7180 Lakeview Drive) at the corner of Elm Street and Lakeview Drive. The owner split the property into three lots, which created two new house lots fronting Elm Street. The installation of city water and sanitary sewer service on Elm St. made this subdivision possible. Staff noted the final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. There is no development agreement because there were two public improvements for the plat. The City Attorney's review of the title commitment is underway and will be fully resolved prior to City Council approval of the final plat. Conditions of approval will be met with building permit review of the new houses. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to recommend approval of the final plat for Elm Street Estates and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. C. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, for Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development/Preliminary Plat for Marshan Townhomes 2 "d Addition, a 23 -unit medium density residential development, NE corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane Chair Rafferty reopened the public hearing at 6:37 p.m. Staff stated applicant has requested a conditional use permit for a residential planned unit development (PUD), and development stage plan (preliminary plat). The subject site is four acres of property at the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane, adjacent to the existing Marshan Lake Condominiums. A PUD is required for multi- family development in a shoreland area. The site was zoned to R -3 earlier this year, making it consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff presented its analysis and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: DRAFT MINUTES • Planning & Zoning Board July 14, 2004 Page 3 1. Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated to Anoka County to total 60 feet from centerline for Lake Drive (CSAH 23). 2. Right -of -way access shall be dedicated to Anoka County along CSAH 23 on the final plat. 3. New plans showing the extended driveways and guest parking stalls shall be submitted three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application. Plans must show landscaping, grading, and any other alterations needed to accommodate the changes. 4. A new landscaping plan shall be submitted with the following changes three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application: -change black ash to green ash or a native oak species -change Colorado spruce to white spruce -change Austrian pine to red or white pine -change autumn applause to northern pin oak -three spruce at the Aqua Lane corner shall be relocated and other landscaping adjusted to accommodate the guest parking stalls. 5. The new plans must include larger individual unit lots to ensure that the eaves and any building projection meets the property line separation to meet fire protection requirements in the building code. 6. The City Engineer's comments in the July 9, 2004 memo must be met to his satisfaction. 7. Park dedication shall be $28,770. 8. Existing buildings on the site shall be removed. 9. The existing well and onsite septic system shall be properly abandoned. 10. Brick veneer base shall be included on all four sides of the buildings. Mr. Ryden asked if the City favored Option A. Mr. Smyser replied Option A was the preferred option to go with. Mr. Root asked if the guest parking would be sufficient. Mr. Smyser replied he believed it would. Chair Rafferty inquired if the proposed location of the parking spaces was the best area to locate them. Mr. Smyser replied the proposed location was the best place for the parking spaces. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 14, 2004 Page 4 Mr. Pogalz asked if the trees would survive the demolition and/or grading process. Mr. Smyser replied some of them would survive, with others being somewhat marginal. He noted they would have to be careful. Mr. Pogalz expressed concern that they were planning around trees that might not survive. Mr. Smyser replied the City Forester and Environmental Board recommended saving those trees. Chair Rafferty invited the public to make comment. Jim Crawford, 614 Aqua Circle, President of Marshan Lake Condominium Association, stated they had three concerns including the guest parking on the west side of the property, and they might have problems with visitors or residents parking their vehicles in their guest parking spots, giving them a policing problem. He stated they would have no control with another association parking in their parking spots. He expressed concern about vision at the stop sign at Lake Drive. He noted the angle of Lake Drive would create vision problems. He expressed concern about the stub street on the northern edge of the property. He asked if they could attach a condition so half of the stub street could be deeded to his association because they needed to use the stub street. He noted half of the street could be blocked off to their residents, if there was no agreement. Mr. Pogalz asked if option 3 might work better for site lines with respect to traffic. Mr. Crawford replied option 3 was acceptable if they could address guest parking. Ron Fuchs, representative of applicant, Hokanson Family Partnership, 9174 Isanti Street N.E., Blaine, stated they would be receptive to redesigning the guest parking spaces. However, he pointed out the existing Marshan Association could also park in their spaces, giving them policing issues. With respect to trees, they would attempt to save all of the trees noted on the plans. He stated they would like to keep the two color schemes as originally proposed, but they would be receptive to adding a number of different color configurations. He stated the park had been designed to the City's request. He indicated with this new proposal, they should receive some park dedication credit back, but they realized they still needed to pay some park dedication and they were working on this with staff. He summarized various methods of how they could determine the park dedication for the Board. Chair Rafferty said he would need to work with staff on the park dedication. Mr. Tralle stated in all of the scenarios of the options, only one showed additional parking — Option A. He noted the Board had made it clear that they wanted guest parking spaces and they were not shown on the other options. Mr. Fuchs replied that option A was what they were requesting and it complied with the Ordinance. Chair Rafferty stated he believed one of the other alternatives might be a better solution. Mr. Tralle stated the Board had asked for something and they had not come back with what was requested. He noted that not including what they asked for in alternate 1, 2, and 3 was a problem. He asked where they were going to put the additional parking with DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 14, 2004 Page 5 • those alternates. Mr. Fuchs pointed out where the additional parking could be placed in those alternatives. • • Ms. Lane stated it came down to how strongly they wanted to preserve the trees. She noted if they used alternative 3, they could not preserve the trees. Mr. Pogalz stated he agreed with Mr. Tralle. He indicated he was in favor of alternate 3, because it was the cleanest of the proposals for site lines and it inserted guest parking throughout the site instead of at one end. He stated he did not believe the trees would survive the construction anyway in alternate 3. Mr. Fuchs stated the proposal with the additional parking spaces substantially exceeded the Code. He requested they consider their preferred option A because it met all of the City requirements and it provided the separation needed between the two associations. Mr. Hyden stated he concurred that alternate 3 was the appropriate option to look at. Mr. Pogalz noted with option 3, he believed there would be less asphalt and therefore less cost for the development. Mr. Tralle inquired about the stub street concern raised. Mr. Fuchs stated their proposal did not access the existing drive and at this time, they did not propose to access that stub street. He noted they had had no discussions with Marshan Lake Townhomes and how they desired to deal with this. He stated they were not proposing to block the access. Chair Rafferty asked if there was any advantage to keeping the road, or would they be willing to deed it to the other association. Mr. Fuchs stated he did not have an answer to that question tonight. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Root. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Pogalz asked what the approval was going to be for, option A or alternate 3. Chair Rafferty replied he understood this decision was up to the Board. Chair Rafferty asked if the developer was in agreement with the conditions as outlined by City staff. Mr. Fuchs replied they were aware of all of the conditions and agreed with conditions 1 through 6, they did not agree with 7, they agreed with 8 and 9, and condition 10 they had already addressed on the revised plan. Chair Rafferty asked staff how they should address condition number 7. Mr. Smyser replied the Board's recommendation was appropriate, but it would be up to the City Council to make the final decision. He stated it was not unusual, however, to have a disagreement on park dedication. Ms. Lane stated with alternate 3, they had not seen a drawing as to where the guest parking was going to be located and she wanted to see a plan prior to approving the development. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 14, 2004 Page 6 Chair Rafferty asked Mr. Hokanson to come forward. He asked him if they could make alternate 3 work with the additional parking. Mr. Hokanson replied alternate 3 was not a good alternate. He stated when he was at the meeting last time, he had not received good direction from the Board. He stated if the Board wanted to change the development, alternate 1 was the best option. He stated with alternate 1, they could get additional parking. He noted it was his misunderstanding that they wanted parking shown in alternates 1, 2, and 3. Mr. Tralle stated a lot of time was put on a four -color scheme and he appreciated that they had brought in a four -color scheme proposal tonight. He noted, however, he was not happy that they had not addressed the guest parking on the alternatives. He asked if they could table this to the next meeting. Mr. Hokanson stated he wanted a decision tonight because of the timing. Mr. Smyser replied the Board still had time if they wanted to continue this to the next meeting. Chair Rafferty stated if the Board chose an alternate, it might not be the alternate they want. He noted they could move forward to Council with a negative or positive from the P &Z Board. He requested they look at alternate 3 and add parking so they could actually see the plan and asked if they be willing to agree to continuing this to the next meeting. Mr. Hokanson replied they were not opposed to alternate 3 and they would add parking to that plan and agree to a tabling. The Board discussed various options as to how alternate 3 could be reworked that would address the Board's concerns. Mr. Pogalz noted he did not care how much parking there was, as long as it was sufficient. He indicated they had not said the development needed 18 spaces and if less spaces fit well, they needed to look at that. With respect to the color scheme he wanted the colors to fit with the rest of the area. Mr. Tralle stated he would be in agreement if each road had a different color scheme, but he was opposed to the entire development having one color scheme. Mr. Hyden agreed. Mr. Hokanson asked for a little more leeway with the color scheme. Chair Rafferty stated he would look at the color schemes provided to staff and would work with Mr. Hokanson on this issue. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to table this to the August, 2004 P &Z Board meeting and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Pogalz stated he or any other Board member would be willing to meet or talk with Mr. Hokanson prior to the next meeting if he had any questions about what the Board was directing. D. Variance to Side Yard Setback, 6396 Langer Lane, Bacchus Homes DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 14, 2004 Page 7 Staff stated on November 13, 2003 the City of Lino Lakes issued a single - family home new construction building permit to Bacchus Homes, Inc. for 6396 Langer Lane (Lot 22, Block 2 of Clearwater Creek 5t1 Addition). The survey submitted with the building permit application on November 5, 2003 indicated the required 5 -foot side setback for the attached accessory structure (garage) as is required by the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. The permit was issued based on this proof of compliance with the zoning code requirements. Staff noted the City of Lino Lakes requires all new construction to submit an "As- Built" survey verifying that the structures are built to the approved specifications. In the case of the subject property, the "As- Built" survey indicated that the attached accessory structure (garage) had actually been built to a 3.9 -foot side setback rather than the 5 -foot side setback as required by the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is now requesting that a variance of 1.1 feet be granted from the ordinance requirement. Staff presented their analysis and recommended approving the variance. Mr. Hyden asked how this happened. Mr. Smyser replied the builder made an error. Mr. Studenski stated this had happened in the past and the building inspectors had stepped up their inspections to find these errors in time. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend approving the variance to side yard setback, 6396 Langer Lane, Bacchus Homes and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5- 0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Temporary Signage, Review of Special Meeting Staff summarized the special P &Z meeting on June 16 to discuss temporary signage. He stated the P &Z Board needed to discuss what types of temporary signage they want to regulate, the definitions of temporary signs, banners, etc., the allowable location(s) for temporary signage, the allowable size (including if a temporary sign should be included in the maximum amount of signage allowed), the allowable time limit for temporary signed (if any), and the enforcement. Mr. Root stated there was a couple of ways they could look at this, one was the temporary signs such as realtor signs, garage sales signs, etc. and the temporary signs that were there for a longer period of time. He agreed signs should not be attached to utility poles and they should be limited in height. He stated signs that were on -site, should be limited to a total area limitation, including signs that are permanently affixed or truly temporary. He stated if a temporary sign was fixed to the building, it should be considered a permanent sign. He agreed they did not have sufficient staff to monitor violations, but believed this could be handled on a complaint basis. He noted this was going to be a tough issue to deal with to balance between the aesthetics and the needs and DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 14, 2004 Page 8 desires of the business community and others. He expressed disappointment that they did not have more businesses attend the meeting to hear more comments. Mr. Hyden requested getting another copy of the summary sheet of other cities that had been prepared previously. He said it was tough to control what businesses wanted to do on their property and they had a right to advertise. However, he believed signs should be fixed to the property and the number of temporary banners should be limited to a time. He stated signage in windows was a non -issue because they were attached to the building. He stated he agreed with the 32 square foot signage. He stated advertising was a very important aspect for a successful business and it was important to let businesses advertise. He stated he believed they needed to address signs that were in the right -of- way, on telephone poles, stop signs, yield signs, and tattered old signs. He stated he did not want to limit garage sale signs, or make the resident get a permit, but he believed the size and height of the sign should be limited. He noted ultimately, they wanted commerce to be successful and the City should invite businesses into the City. He stated he did not want to see the restrictions get too tight because it was important not to discourage businesses from coming into the City. Ms. Lane stated she was not at the special meeting, but she was disappointed that only two businesses had attended. She stated they should have some representative task force to look at this though. Chair Rafferty stated he did not want this to be micromanaged and believed signs of a permanent basis were to be encouraged. He stated he would also like to receive a copy of the summary Mr. Smyser had previously prepared. Mr. Tralle stated he agreed partially with Mr. Hyden. He stated just because a business owned a property, did not mean they can fill it up with banners. He stated there was an option to hire a part-time enforcement officer as the City of Ramsey was proposing to do. Chair Rafferty asked what was staffs recommendation. Mr. Smyser replied they would have something put together for the Board to discuss at their next meeting. Chair Rafferty suggested staff and the Board members take pictures of what they liked and did not like with respect to signage on properties. B. 2004/2005 City Council Goals Staff stated in May, 2004 the City Council held a goal setting session to determine the High Priority Goals for 2004 -2005. The Council at their June 14, 2004 meeting adopted the seven goals. Each of the goals includes a specific Management Action Plan (MAPs) for pursing implementation. The MAPs identify specific performance, objectives, schedules, methodologies, and action plans. They also identify operating and capital budget requirements. He noted it would be likely the P &Z Board will be heavily involved in several of the key action steps identified for implementation. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 14, 2004 Page 9 Mr. Tralle asked if there were any plans for bike trails along Lake Drive. Mr. Grochala replied there were not plans for an immediate trail, but this was being looked at for the future. Chair Rafferty asked what does review the comp plan mean. He expressed concern as to where it was going. Mr. Grochala replied this has been a hot topic with Council for quite a few months. He stated it was the Board's responsibility to review comp plan changes and it was a concern whether or not to involve the P &Z Board or have Council and staff work on any changes. However, this would limit the public's involvement if they did that. He stated it was their intent to put a comprehensive list together and present this to the Board and City Council for their input. Chair Rafferty stated he was disappointed they had the issue of reinventing the wheel going on again. He noted the citizen's input should be for 2008 and not revise the current comp plan. He stated they needed to move forward and not keep going backwards. He stated staff had done their job in getting the comp plan approved and his comments were not a reflection on them. He stated he was disappointed as a taxpayer that they were reinventing the wheel again. He noted the problem was that they could not even get to the review process with the City Council, the P &Z Board, and staff and that was what was wrong. C. Proposed Schwan's Relocation Staff stated Schwan's had indicated they were interested in relocating their existing facility on Lake Drive and expanding into a new facility in the Marshan Lake Industrial Park. He noted Schwan's is seeking guidance as to compliance with the city's existing ordinance for delivery vehicle parking/exterior storage. Staff reviewed their code analysis and indicated the issue of parking trucks outdoors in commercial and industrial areas and the applicability of exterior storage requirements has been raised several times in the past. The 2003 Zoning Ordinance update did provide some additional clarification to the issue. However, the discussion and modifications made related primarily to semi - trucks and trailers. He noted it was staff's opinion that the proposed Schwan's delivery trucks would not be considered exterior storage. However, any site development for the proposed use would need to comply with screening requirements. Schwan's has indicated they are working on a site design that screens the parking area from I -35W. Staff stated the City's Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) discussed the issue at its July 1, 2004 meeting and recommended support for the Schwan's project in the Marshan Lake Industrial Park with proper screening. Staff indicated they would like comments from the Board on this issue. Chair Rafferty asked if they could put in some type of garage structure where it would be enclosed away from the elements. He stated he liked their concept, but would like to see some type of a garage structure to enhance the property. He expressed concern about freestanding garbage structures also. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 14, 2004 Page 10 Mr. Pogalz agreed that landscaping could be sufficient screening. He stated he did not see any reason they could not work forward with Schwans on this. He stated he did not want the company to leave the City. He stated the cost to add a garage might be too excessive. Mr. Root stated he agreed the trucks could be screened appropriately with landscaping. He expressed concern about the City being too specific for this business though and they needed to look at this carefully. He suggested they change the language to make it more specific. Chair Rafferty suggested looking into the possibility of putting in a berm for screening also. He agreed a garage might not be economically feasible. Mr. Tralle stated this was an industrial park and this type of business belonged in this area and not where they were presently located. He stated people would have to accept that they would see part of these businesses. He believed Schwans would be a great addition to the industrial park and he wanted to keep them in the City. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM V. A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala P & Z MEETING DATE: August 11, 2004 TOPIC: Final Plat: Marshan Estates BACKGROUND Marshan Estates is a 5 lot residential subdivision located adjacent to the existing Marshan Lane. The project also includes six outlots which are intended to be deeded to adjacent property owners to correct ambiguities in existing property descriptions. The City Council approved the preliminary plat 04 -32 on March 8, 2004. On July 26th, 2004 the City Council approved the development agreement for the subdivision and ordered the extension of sanitary sewer and water infrastructure to service the development. The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. The title commitment for the property has been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. As required under the conditions of preliminary plat approval the developer has provided a 10 foot pedestrian/bicycle easement along Lot 1, Block 1, adjacent to Lake Drive as well as a 20 foot conservation easement adjacent to County Ditch No. 10. All park dedication, securities and fees have been submitted. All other conditions of approval will be met with building permit review of the new houses. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plat for Elm Street Estates. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 ATTACHMENTS 1. General Location Map 2. Final Plat ‘"1/2011 • •*, ,,,bx • • t •1'4 • 2) Materials and equipment currently being used for construction on the premises. c. Within an industrial zoning district, the exterior storage of semi- trailers accessory to the principal use may be allowed by conditional use permit according to Section 8, Subd. 1 and Subd. 2. Semi - trailers connected to semi - tractors queuing for loading or unloading shall be considered truck parking and be exempt from the outdoor storage conditional use permit. Section 8., Subdivision 1.I.5 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Conditional Use for Open and Outdoor Storage stipulates the following: Open and outdoor storage (not outdoor sales lots) as an accessory use provided that: a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring uses, residential zoning districts, and public rights -of- way per Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. b. Storage area is fenced in a manner approved by the City. c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the City Council. d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of this Ordinance or other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this Ordinance and not in front yards. f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, including land in a neighboring city. "Abutting" includes across a street. "Abutting" does not include properties that touch only corner to corner. g. The property shall not abut I -35W or I -35E. h. The storage area shall not abut a school or a public park. i. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. \ \Linogate02 \shared\Planning & Zoning Board\Packets\2004 PacketsUuly 14, 2004 \Item 6C.doc • j. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. • • Staff Opinion The issue of parking trucks outdoors in commercial and industrial areas and the applicability of exterior storage requirements has been raised several times in the past. The 2003 Zoning Ordinance update did provide some additional clarification to the issue. However, the discussion and modifications made related primarily to semi - trucks and trailers. While the definition of exterior storage includes "vehicles" the exterior storage requirements in Section 3., Subdivision 4.P.2 states in part that "Semi- trailers connected to semi - tractors queuing for loading or unloading shall be considered truck parking and be exempt from the outdoor storage conditional use permit ". Therefore it is our opinion that the proposed Schwan's delivery trucks would not be considered exterior storage. However, any site development for the proposed use would need to comply with screening requirements. Schwan's has indicated they are working on a site design that screens the parking area from I -35W. The City's Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) discussed the issue at its July 1, 2004 meeting and recommended support for the Schwan's project in the Marshan Lake Industrial Park with proper screening. Staff would like comments from the board on this issue. We anticipate the need to review and revise the ordinance language to avoid any further ambiguity. Attachment 1. Site Location \ \Linogate02\shared\Planning & Zoning Board\Packets\2004 Packets\July 14, 2004 \Item 6C.doc MARSHAN ESTATES KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Clyde L. Rehbein and Arlene M. Rehbein, husband and wife, owners of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota to wit: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence North 00 degrees, 04 minutes, East, assumed bearing along the east line thereof 269.91 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 66 degrees, 01 minute West 212.56 feet; thence South 23 degrees, 59 minutes West 91 feet to the center of a 50 foot radius cul -de -sac; thence South 13 degrees, 59 minutes West 281.87 feet to a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter distant 1013.21 east from the southwest corner thereof; thence South 89 degrees, 56 minutes West along said south line 65.80 feet; thence North 02 degrees, 25 minutes West 38.11 feet; thence North 02 degrees, 39 minutes East 28.5 feet; thence North 28 degrees, 47 minutes West 75 feet; thence North 46 degrees, 56 minutes West 35.5 feet; thence North 23 degrees, 10 minutes West 58.00 feet; thence North 40 degrees, 40 minutes West 39.00 feet; thence North 46 degrees, 19 minutes West 61.00 feet; thence North 71 degrees, 17 minutes West 30.00 feet; thence North 54 degrees, 16 minutes West 39.50 feet; thence North 78 degrees, 56 minutes West 53.95 feet, thence North 21 degrees, 42 minutes 12 second East 202.62 feet; thence North 65 degrees, 56 minutes, 34 seconds West 198.03 feet to the southeasterly right -of -way line of Old Trunk Highway No. 8; thence North 24 degrees, 56 minutes East 283.96 feet along said right -of -way line to a point distant 938.14 feet northeasterly from the south line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter as measured along said right -of -way line; thence South 66 degrees, 23 minutes East 242.6 feet; thence South 24 degrees, 14 minutes West 213.98 feet., thence South 67 degrees, 07 minutes East 526.24 feet to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees, 04 minutes West along said east line 84.85 feet to the point of beginning. Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as MARSHAN ESTATES and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for the public use forever the Court, Lane, and Drive and the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only, and also dedicate to the County of Anoka the right of access onto County State Aid Highway N. 23, as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Clyde L. Rehbein, and Arlene M. Rehbein, husband and wife, have hereunto set their hands this _ day of , 2004. SIGNED: Clyde L. Rehbein STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Arlene M. Rehbein The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2004 by Clyde L. Rehbein and Arlene M. Rehbein, husband and wife. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires: I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as MARSHAN ESTATES, that this plat is a correct representation of the survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments will be correctly placed in the ground as designated; that the outside boundary Imes are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no wet lands as defined in MS 505.02, Sub. 1, or public highways to be designated other than as shown. Mathew T. Kytonen, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 18213 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA The surveyor's certificate was subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, within and for said County and State this day of Kytonen, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 18213. Notary Public, Anoka County, Minnesota My Commission Expires , 2004, by Mathev: T. CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC110N 17, T.31, R. 22. LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA We hereby certify that the City Council of Lino Lakes, duly accepted and approved the plat of MARSHAN ESTATES at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 2004. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA By By: Mayor Clerk This plat of MARSHAN ESTATES was checked and approved by me this day of , 2004. By: Anoka County Surveyor OUTLOT A 1 IN. = 20 FT. OUTLOT B 1 IN. = 20 FT. 1 IN. = 30 FT. e 10 r ` 806 McOS v� B ,t, , V \ or / ■� • `S''Ct3 "'e fja 1 \ / 42/ • 13�, / px. P \ / 72z o��; CSI / - / RT / 6 N :'/ / / i'`L / 'es g \ y / 808 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 17, T.31, R. 22. MARSHAN ESTATES / / cc / 0- / 1 IN. 30 FT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT, THE EAST UNE OF 5E 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 17, T.31, R. 22 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N0014'49'W. • DENOTES FOUND IRON PIPE AND MARKED AS SHOWN. DENOTES A 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT 0 MARKED R.LS. NO. 18213. THAT WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED TO COUNTY OF ANOKA DRAINAGE AND UTIUTY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: I 1 5.00 10.00-1 _7- — 1-5.00 r-10.00 11 L__ - -J NOT TO SCALE f BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT UNES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET UNES AND REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. / / / / / 0 ry / .g'.4,. 50 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 u 50 lea / / / o / U ' ,yG 3� D9 /\ e H h / e / _ \ / /\_ \/ (..----SW Cor. of SE 1/4. NW 1/4, Sec 17, T. 31. R. 22. (M FEET ) I inch - 50 tt. —/ / / / / / / / 1 Fnd 1/2' IP Sg$1 /9 / 56J.A■ k- 0 U Stk. pZ Or.4 Syr t 2 / Fd P' 3 / / / / OUTLOT D 1 IN. = 30 FT. s,007, _ Vi e LA,'92�p / / / / / e / / :�N / / � c /� / ..O /n' / NN IC' .,/ Z / 1 0/ / h°'/ / ry/ / _/ 53.08 / 58128'33"5'- �s7 �/ End 172' IP aa' % 876 \ h3.23 / pRAf "AGF 10O County Hwy n ash 0 �1/ 7g 56 p0 -W \ OHWL - 883.3 J) � Opp 00 N‘g X141 1013.21 589'56'00'W / 04-7:4•07, MSS,b ;, �6Zf� DF eoe . 533. 0040 00.. • \, oo 2— ' - 59•.y1 b 00 e,,cP Nkk(3 oo nc„ Off_ �cn t��' 2, v. 0 00 0 G 28 N023900.5"E0.E \ 57T35 pS,W 38.11_) NO2'25'00°W \ Line of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4, Sec, 17, T. 31. R. 22. N N 3w N 3 4' 8 _<a N n NZ t ' N w F aT. \ i A N "a \ W `" \ 1 \ .,1 N ■ "—Point 1013.21 ft. east of SW Co, of SE 1/4, NW 1/4, Sec. 17. T. 31, R. 22. 65.80 \S89'56'00'W 4 • • • AGENDA ITEM V. B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: August 11, 2004 TOPIC: Final Plat: Crystal Cove BACKGROUND The City Council approved the preliminary plat for Crystal Cove with Resolution 03 -141 on September 8, 2003. This project involves developing Outlot B of Highland Meadows East, which is on the south side of 79th St. just west of Lake Drive. The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. The development agreement is in progress and will be completed prior to City Council review. The City Attorney's review of the title commitment is underway and will be fully resolved prior to City Council consideration of the final plat. Conditions of approval will be addressed within the development agreement. One additional issue requires resolution. An easement is needed on property to the south for a utility connection. This easement must be obtained with a deed from the adjacent property owner. This deed must be submitted for review prior to City Council review. We normally would require completion of this prior to P & Z review. However, this can be dealt with before approval by the City Council. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plat for Crystal Cove. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • • • KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Generation Homes. LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company. owner and proprietor and Lokelond Construction Finance, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, mortgagee of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka, Stole of Minnesota, to —wit: Outlot B, HIGHLAND MEADOWS EAST. according to the recorded plot thereof. Anoka County, Minnesolo. Hove caused the some to be surveyed and plotted os CRYSTAL COVE and do hereby donote and dedicate to the public for public use forever the drive and drainage and utility easements as shown on the plot. Also dedicating to the County of Anoka the right of access onto County State Aid Highway No. 23 as shown on the plat. In witness whereof said Generation Homes, LLC has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20 Also in witness whereof said Lakelond Construction Finance, LLC. has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this — day of GENERATION HONES, LLC Seth J. Marshall, President LAKELAND CONSTRUCTION FINANCE, LLC,: OS , as STATE OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of • COUNTY OF_) 20 . by Seth J. Marshall. as President of Generation Homes, LLC. o Minnesota Limited Liability Company on behalf of the Company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission expires STATE OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of COUNTY OF_� asp by of Lakeland Construction Finance, LLC, a Minnesolo Limited as Liability Company on behalf of the company. Nolory Public, My Commission expires County. Minnesota CRYSTAL COVE I hereby certify that I hove surveyed and plotted the land described in the dedication n thiisnplot s CRYSTAL COVE; in that this plot is a correct representation of said survey, that oil dislonces are correctly s on and hundredths of a foot; that all m uments hove been correctly placed in the ground as shown, or shall be correctly placed in the ground within one year otter the recording date of this plot; that the outside boundaries correctly designated on said plot; and that there ar e no wetlands, m accordance with M.S. 505.02 Subdivision 1, orepublic highways to be designated on said plot other than as shown thereon. Jeffrey N. Caine, Registered Lond Surveyor Minnesolo License No. 12257 STATE OF MINNESOTA) The surveyors veyors certificate was ocknowledged before me a Notary Public. this COUNTY OF ANOKA ) day of 20_., by Jeffrey N. Caine, Land Surveyor. Notary Public. Anoka County. Minnesota My Commission expires CITY OF LINO LAKES We hereby certify that the City Council of the City of Lino Lobes, Anoka County, Minnesota, duly accepted and approved the plat of CRYSTAL COVE of o regular meeting held this day of 20__ If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of t he of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the city or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations. as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By Mayor By Clerk Checked and approved this By day of . 20 Anoka County Surveyor r� NORTH 30 60 SCALE — 1 INCH = 30 FEET DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: 0 1 15 J 11 51 L 0 BEING 10 FEET WOE AND ADJOINING ALL STREET RIGHT —OF —WAY LINES AND REAR LOT LINES AND 5 FEET WIDE AND ADJOINING ALL SIDE LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. / — ---N. Line of Outlot B. HIGHLAND MEADOWS EAST 584:57'08"E 239.80 • / f / /4,4./ / / 1F �� / / / / / • / / / / / / / • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT. O D E SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IORNOT, WILMINNESOTA BETSSET STATUTE, N WHETHER YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT, AND SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A 1/2" INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY RLS 12251. A— DENOTES "RIGHT OF ACCESS" DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA. / / / / 50 / / / / City of Lino Lakes County of Anoko Sec. 8, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 For the purposes of this plat, the north line of Outlot B, HIGHLAND MEADOWS EAST, Anoko County, Minnesota, is assumed to bear 584'57'08 "E. / / / / juL 2004 RLK ) RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. • • AGENDA ITEM V. C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: August 11, 2004 TOPIC: Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development and Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addition Hokanson Development, Inc. BACKGROUND Hokanson Development has submitted a request for a conditional use permit for a residential planned unit development (PUD), and development stage plan (preliminary plat). The subject site is four acres of property at the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Aqua Lane, adjacent to the existing Marshan Lake Condominiums. A PUD is required for multi - family development in a shoreland area. The site was rezoned to R -3 earlier this year, making it consistent with the comprehensive plan. The P & Z opened the public hearing at the June 9 meeting, continued it to July and then closed the hearing. The application then was tabled to the August meeting to allow the applicant to make design changes. ANALYSIS Land Use, Density, Zoning The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site single family home and vacant Medium Density Residential R -3 Medium Density Residential North Marshan Lake Condominiums Medium Density Residential R -4 High Density Residential South commercial (Automotive Refinish Technol.) & residential Performance Lane Use and Low Density Sewered Residential GB General Bus. and R -1X Single Family Executive East Marshan Lake Condominiums Medium Density Residential R -4 High Density Residential West Lake Drive, Wenzel Farm townhomes Medium Density Residential R -3 Medium Density PDO • • Marshan Townhomes 2' Addn. page 2 The following is a summary of the of the proposal: Gross Site Area 4.05 acres Upland Area 4.05 acres Right of Way Dedication 0.21 acres Resulting Area 3.84 acres Total Units 23 Resulting Density 5.99 units /acre The existing Marshan Lake Condominiums were approved in 1995, with the second phase approved in 1996. They were built at a density of 6.4 units /acre, in accordance with the approved site plans. The City began work on a new comprehensive plan in 1996 -97 and approved it in 2002. The entire Marshan Lake Condominiums site and the remaining four -acres now proposed for development is guided Medium Density Residential. This allows a density of 3 -6 units per acre. The project falls within this range. Zoning: The four -acre site recently was rezoned to R -3, Medium Density Residential to make it consistent with the comprehensive plan. The site is within a shoreland overlay district. The specific requirements relative to the proposed project are discussed below under "Preliminary Plat /PUD ". The shoreland ordinance requires a PUD for multifamily development in a shoreland overlay area. Growth Management: The City's growth management policy (Ordinance 01 -03) implements growth policies of the comprehensive plan. It establishes limits on the number of new units to be approved as well on the use of MUSA reserve. The site is within the existing MUSA, so the MUSA reserve limit is not applicable The 147 units per year have been reached for 2004 and the allowable 20% also has been used (see attached table). As of the July 26 City Council meeting, 133 lots have been approved for 2005, so there are lots available. However, this project will push into the discretionary 20% for 2005. Other projects listed in the table as "proposed" will push even further into the 20 %. PRELIMINARY PLAT/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Section 2, Subd. 10 of the zoning ordinance discusses the purpose of a planned unit development (PUD). The application should be compared to these purposes in order to justify any flexibility requested by the applicant. • Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for the grouping of lots or buildings for development as an integrated, • Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 3 coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development. This section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of lots, buildings and activities, which promote the goals outlined in the Comprehensive Plan or serve another public purpose. It is further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance of parking, open space and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses. A residential conditional use permit PUD may include a variety of residential units, including single family and multifamily units as long as it complies with the density requirements. A non - residential conditional use permit PUD may include a variety of commercial and /or industrial uses. A PUD that includes a mix of residential and commercial /industrial uses must utilize the PUD zoning district as described in Sec. 9 Subd. 3 of this ordinance. The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage: • 1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. 6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations. • • • Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 4 The following table summarizes project design elements: Buildings, Units: The layout of the project underwent significant redesign after the July meeting. Based on the direction from the P & Z, the three -unit building now is on the north side of the project site and all units front on private access drives. The proposal still includes eleven buildings. Ten buildings are twin homes, the other is a three -unit. They are all two -story structures. Each unit includes 1633 sf. The garages are similar in size to other recently approved PUD projects. The P & Z directed the applicant to provide guest parking, even if it means the project won't meet the open space or impervious surface requirements. The guest parking now is included. A PUD does allow flexibility for design. The zoning ordinance requirements are as follows (Sec.3, Subd. 4.B.2.b.4)): Exterior Building Finish: The exterior of townhome dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, townhome dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: a) A minimum of twenty -five (25) percent of the combined area of all building facades of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone. b) Except for brick, stucco, and /or natural or artificial stone, no single building facade shall have more than seventy -five (75) percent of one type of exterior finish. • c) For the purpose of this section, the area of the building facade shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. required proposed unit size R -3: 920 sf 1633 sf setbacks local street arterial street side yard rear yard 30 ft or 25 ft from internal streets in PUD 40 ft 10 ft 30 25 ft 40 ft 25 ft -- impervious max 65% shoreland: 35% 35.6% open space 50% for PUD 50% height max. 36 ft. 26 ft. at peak Buildings, Units: The layout of the project underwent significant redesign after the July meeting. Based on the direction from the P & Z, the three -unit building now is on the north side of the project site and all units front on private access drives. The proposal still includes eleven buildings. Ten buildings are twin homes, the other is a three -unit. They are all two -story structures. Each unit includes 1633 sf. The garages are similar in size to other recently approved PUD projects. The P & Z directed the applicant to provide guest parking, even if it means the project won't meet the open space or impervious surface requirements. The guest parking now is included. A PUD does allow flexibility for design. The zoning ordinance requirements are as follows (Sec.3, Subd. 4.B.2.b.4)): Exterior Building Finish: The exterior of townhome dwelling units shall include a variation in building materials which are to be distributed throughout the building facades and coordinated into the architectural design of the structure to create an architecturally balanced appearance. In addition, townhome dwelling structures shall comply with the following requirements: a) A minimum of twenty -five (25) percent of the combined area of all building facades of a structure shall have an exterior finish of brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone. b) Except for brick, stucco, and /or natural or artificial stone, no single building facade shall have more than seventy -five (75) percent of one type of exterior finish. • c) For the purpose of this section, the area of the building facade shall not include area devoted to windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas. • • • Marshan Townhomes 2x1 Addn. page 5 We received building elevations on July 7th. They show a light brown vinyl siding with a darker brown vinyl shake in the gable ends. A dark brown brick veneer base is shown on the front of the buildings, though none on the sides or backs. At the July 14 P & Z meeting, the applicant agreed to brick around all four sides of the buildings and submitted revised elevations showing this. Structure Setbacks: We have been experiencing confusion among builders due to the adoption last year of the International Building Code. Fire protection requirements in the code dictate a minimum structure separation from property lines unless the structure includes specified fire protection elements. To meet the code requirements, the furthest projection must be at least three feet from the property line or special fire protection requirements apply. This would include no openings such as windows or soffit vents. Lino Lakes has made the decision that the building must meet the three -foot separation from the actual property line of the unit rather than outer border of the larger common area property line. This includes the sunrooms on the rear of the buildings. The individual unit lots must be platted deep enough to ensure that this three foot separation is met. This must be shown on the final plat. Streets, Access: The plan shows additional right of way to be dedicated for Lake Drive (CSAH 23). This would meet Anoka County's requirement for 60' from centerline. Access to all buildings would be via private drives off of Aqua Circle. The drives are 24 ft. wide, back of curb to back of curb. The Century Farm North project has the same design for the townhome access drives. The existing Marshan Townhomes have wider access drives: 28' back of curbs. The proposal is acceptable. The P & Z recommended a new layout at the July 14 meeting. A new preliminary plat received July 30 shows that layout. At the request of the P & Z, I contacted the Fire and Police Depts. to ask if the length of the driveways in the existing development has created any public safety concerns. The Police Dept. said there have been no problems from their perspective. The Fire Chief also informed me that there have been no problems. Since the existing townhomes used this design, he had no concern. Though the new proposed driveway is even longer than the existing ones, the Aqua Lane and Lake Drive are close enough to provide access in addition to the driveway itself. For future new development, we probably should consider turnaround areas on drives of this length. Guest Parking: The P & Z desired that guest parking spaces be added, even though this would reduce the open space and increase the impervious surface area. The applicant has included guest parking stalls in the revised plans. The drive /parking areas would still be at least 10 feet from the new right of way of Lake Drive and from Aqua Lane. The proposed alternative is workable. Grading and landscaping must be adjusted to • Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 6 accommodate the change. A new set of plans that includes this design must be submitted three weeks prior to city council review. Utilities, Stormwater Management: There is no ponding or treatment included in the proposal. The existing stormwater management design for the area accommodates development on this site. However, stormwater treatment must be provided in accordance with the most recent regulatory requirements. This will be reviewed in greater detail as the project progresses. The Rice Creek Watershed District requires District review for multi -unit development over 2.5 acres. The Watershed District granted preliminary approval on June 23. There was some uncertainty about the existing utility stubs and their adequacy for this project. On July 29, the applicant and City Engineer determined what exists and what is needed by excavating on the site. There was not adequate time for the applicant to prepare a new utility plan. However, we know what is necessary and it should not be difficult to prepare a plan. Staff is comfortable that this can be accomplished for City Council review. Landscaping: The existing townhomes screen this site from the lake, so screening is not an issue as it might be for lakeshore property. The proposed landscaping is adequate. Several species were changed according to the Environmental Board's recommendations. However, Colorado Spruce must be changed as well. This is listed in the conditions of approval. Lighting: No street or yard lighting is shown on the plans. There is no reason to provide any such lighting. Park Dedication: The following information was discussed at the July 14 meeting and is reiterated here. The applicant has maintained that land dedicated with the larger development included the dedication for most of the current four -acre site. Staff has researched the file for the Marshan condominiums project. The situation is complicated because there is some, but not complete overlap of the two project areas, the original project was not completely built, and the ordinance requirements for park dedication have changed. The 1995 project included 29.9 acres. A total of 139 units were approved for the project. The density then was 139/29.9 = 4.65 u/a. Part of the site included an area of 1.5 acres labeled "future commercial" in which no dwelling units were shown. One 5 -unit building did not get built, as it was on land not ultimately platted as part of the project. Both of these areas are within the four -acre site of the current proposal. At the time, the subdivision ordinance included a progressive scale: the percentage of land for park dedication increased as the density of a project increased. (This was • • Marshan Townhomes 2"d Addn. page 7 adopted with Ordinance 05 -91.) A density of 3 to 5 units per acre required a park dedication of 12% of the land. Twelve percent of 29.9 acres is 3.6 acres. The developer dedicated a 3.0 acre park and a trail corridor of 0.6 acres, for a total of 3.6 acres. Current park dedication is $1665 per unit when land is not needed. For the 23 units currently proposed, this would total $38,295. The developer maintains that he should not be charged dedication for the 1.5 acres "future commercial" area or for the area where the five units didn't get built. It is reasonable to give credit for the five units that did not get built, and staff recommends doing so. This reduces the dedication by 5 x $1665 = $8,325 . However, it is not appropriate simply to give credit for the 1.5 acres by completely eliminating it from any new dedication. There were no units shown in that area on the 1995 plan. Though the land was included in the calculations for the original project, the additional units were not. Removing the 1.5 acres from consideration for additional dedication would be like not charging park dedication for new units being built in the spaces between the existing buildings. (There are 11 units in that area on the new proposal. Had there been another 11 or 12 units there, it would have raised the density of the 1995 project to 5+ units /acre, which would have required a 14% park dedication (139 + 11 = 150 and 150/29.9 acres = 5.02 u/a). This would have required a dedication of 29.9 acres x 14% = 4.19 acres. Since 3.6 acres was dedicated, there would have been a shortage of 0.59 acres of park dedication.) It is appropriate to get additional park dedication since the additional units generate additional demand for park services. It also is reasonable to consider giving some credit for the past park dedication on the 1995 project. The ordinance at the time included an equation for calculating cash dedication. It used a land value of $10,000 per acre. This seems reasonable. The project density fell into the 12% park dedication category. Applying this to that land value yields 1.5 acre x $10,000 = $15,000. $15,000 x 12% = $1800. This is a reasonable credit for the past dedication. Summarized, this all results in the following: 23 new units x $1665 = $38,295 less credit for 5 units: 5 x $1665 = ($8,325) less credit for past dedication on 1.5 acres = ($1,800) total new park dedication $28,170 Staff recommends a park dedication of $28,170 for the new project. • • • Marshan Townhomes 2" d Addn. page 8 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed the application on May 26th. The comments are attached. Changes to species that were not done on the July 30 landscaping plan are included in the conditions of approval. Inspection of imported soils is required by development agreements. Irrigating the sod areas is listed in notes on the landscaping plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following conditions should be attached to any approval of the project: 1. Additional right of way shall be dedicated to Anoka County to total 60 feet from centerline for Lake Drive (CSAH 23). 2. Right of access shall be dedicated to Anoka County along CSAH 23 on the final plat. 3. A new landscaping plan shall be submitted with the following changes three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application: - change Colorado spruce to white spruce 4. The final plat must include larger individual unit lots to ensure that the eaves and any building projection meets the property line separation to meet fire protection requirements in the building code. 5. A revised preliminary utility plan and preliminary grading must be prepared and submitted three weeks prior to City Council consideration of the application. The previous submittals are void due to the revised layout of the project. The City Engineer's comments in the July 9, 2004 memo and the August 6 memo must be met to his satisfaction. 6. Park dedication shall be $28,170. 7. Existing buildings on the site shall be removed. 8. The existing well and onsite septic system shall be properly abandoned. 9. Brick veneer base shall be included on all four sides of the buildings. 10. The project shall not be final platted until 2005 to comply with the growth management policy. • Marshan Townhomes 2nd Addn. page 9 OPTIONS 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development and Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, with conditions. 2. Deny the application. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 This report is based on the following documents: • Existing Conditions, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Preliminary Plat, July 30, 2004, received July 30 410/ • Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Utility Plan, update received July 9 • Tree Preservation Plan, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Landscape Plan, July 30, 2004, received July 30 • Landscape Details, May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Detail Sheets (2), May 5, 2004, received May 7 • Building Elevations and Floor Plans, 2 -unit and 3 -unit Buildings, May 6, 2004, received May 7 • Alternative layouts, faxed July 6, 2004 • Color building elevations received July 7, 2004 • ,o ct rip C1A N C.) cztO 0 • O CD N N- N a O Cn • O ,w x N a) 03 M r E 0 O O N 0 N I 2491 r r 0 101 C'r) LO N r N T T r V N O N CO 0 C) CO r CO N CO M O ID is /units to be final platted O O O N O 03 O 0 N O O O N co CO co M CO O 0 N I 43 N CO L ct O N r CC) 0 O N N Cf) 51 O r N 181 00 r CO N r r CD ti T O O N co r 0 I__ 561 0 0 r N CD M O O N N C L 56 r O O r CO N N N T r CD 'd' r year end 2002 r ID r U) n N P1 ^L LL co O T O 249 r 0 56 10 co N LO T N O r T N' N O r N 181 CO r CO N (O CC') Development Name approved prelim. plats Y O o � , N O U - Q N ICentury Farms North Keefe: prel plat, not final plat Morton (minor subdiv) Ravens Hollow Haley Manor (10 new lots) Crystal Cove Millers Crossroads Lakeview Estates (2 new) Snell (minor subdivision) Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th Justin's Preserve Marshan Estates Rice Creek Church duplex Rice Church: Oakwood View C a Q Cn C C IHighland Meadows East 2nd (proposed Pheasant Hills 12th island West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add Marshan Townhomes 2nd Fox Den Acres (resubmittal) yR, r CO ti M N- N- v ti N O O) N ;ifs' 03 r C3) N 0) c N C` C3) co O N r- _ r L C • N 0 C O (6 r (U w- v- 0) O O (�6 0) 0) C C rn C .0 .0 0 U C . CO O E E U CL. 2 N a) • Memorandum DATE: August 6, 2004 TO: Jeff Smyser /2 FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Marshan Lake Townhomes 2nd Ad ition Attached is the TKDA review dated August 6, 2004, of the submitted documents for the Marshan Lake Townhomes 2nd Addition site. Please note that there will have to be changes to the utility design because the building locations have changed and the City will not allow main line extensions from the existing 4" service stubs. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this project. Please contact me with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651- 982 -2400 ® Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 ® TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 fax www.tkda.com To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Marshan Lake Townhomes Copies To: 2nd Addition Comm. No. From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Routing: Date: August 6, 2004 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 12701 -002 Engineering Reviews for this proposed development were previously prepared and presented in memorandums dated December 5, 2003, June 4, 2004, and July 9, 2004. A revised Preliminary Plat and Landscape Plan (both dated July 30, 2004) have since been received. A field utility locate was also performed on July 30. This review memorandum as presented herein essentially repeats much of the same information presented in the July 9, 2004 memorandum, along with adjustments as a result of the revised documents received. •Comments are as follows: 1. All outstanding and remaining conditions stated in the July 9, 2004 Memorandum must be addressed and completed. This would include the submittal of a revised utility plan. 2. Per the previous review comments, a revised utility plan must be received. 3. The property is adjacent to the Anoka County Roadway. Therefore, the Preliminary and Final plats will require the review of the County. An additional dedication of 15 feet to the County right of way is shown as required. It is not expected that any construction related permits from Anoka County will be required. However, any side grading into the Anoka County right of way would require a permit. 4. Intersection sight distance requirements provide that no trees or vegetation may be planted within the County right of way, or at any locations that will restrict corner visibility sight lines. There does appear to be some plantings proposed within the newly dedicated additional 15 feet, and these should be eliminated. In addition, a revised utility plan must be submitted to assure that plantings are not placed over utilities. 5. As stated in the July 9, 2004 review, further approval and/or acknowledgement from the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be attained as may be required to confirm compliance with the original site permit. 406. Because the site area exceeds one acre, the development also falls under the new rules requiring an NPDES permit. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining this permit. This also includes the submittal of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City in accordance with NPDES Marshan Lake Townhomes Review Page 2 August 6, 2004 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • requirements. Silt fence and erosion control details are provided on the plans and shall be installed accordingly. 7. Per the Survey and Existing Conditions Plan previously submitted, several buildings including houses, barns, sheds, and a garage all exist on the site. Demolition, removal, and grading of the site will therefore be required. The applicant will be responsible for the complete removal of all buildings, foundations, underground and above ground items, capping of any existing utility connections and wells, and removal of any underground, fuel storage or septic systems that may exist. All debris and unsuitable material must be removed from the site. Any material imported to the site must be approved by the City Engineer. 8. Geotechnical information was previously provided. As previously stated, additional excavation of fine alluvial silts and replacement with compactable granular material may be required for construction of the buildings and private drives. Groundwater levels may also necessitate dewatering for the utility installations. Any imported topsoil, fill material, or granular materials for roadway and building foundation (material and source) must be approved by the City Engineer. • 9. The preliminary plat provides for standard drainage and utility easements (10 feet in width) around the perimeter of the property as required. In addition, 44 foot wide drainage and utility easements covering the two private driveways are also provided. As previously stated, the driveway easements as shown shall also be dedicated to include access in addition to the drainage and utility dedication. 10. A revised utility plan must be received for review and approval. A field exploration was conducted on July 30, 2004 to verify the size and location of the existing utility line extensions to the site. The site exploration confirms that three sets of sewer and water services ((3) X 4" water services and (3) X 6 "sanitary sewer services) extend from Aqua Circle. As stated in the previous review, the City will not allow any main line utility extensions from the existing 4" service stubs. The proposed watermain will therefore be required to connect directly to the existing 12" main, or to a 6" hydrant lead if available (hydrant would require relocation). The existing 6" stubs can be connected to with 8" lines, provided that a manhole is installed at the connection point. No sanitary sewer main line cleanouts will be allowed. All utility extensions and streets /driveways shall be considered private and will not be owned or maintained by the City of Lino Lakes. This must be detailed in an Agreement between the City and the Applicant. The utility plan shall also show the specific locations of individual valve boxes and their service termination points (between street and building). Individual sanitary sewer and water services must also meet minimum separation distances. • 11 As previously stated, all utility work shall be performed in accordance with the City of Lino Lakes, City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Specifications, and City of Lino Lakes building permit requirements. Water pipe and appurtenances shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, and as follows: Hydrants - Waterous Pacer WB -67; Valves - Mueller A2370 -20 or equal. DIP pipe shall be Class 52. All sanitary sewer service pipes shall be SDR 26 or Schedule 40. The location and number of hydrants will be subject to the review of the City Fire Chief. Safety and traffic control during construction must be provided in accordance with the State of Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Marshan Lake Townhomes Review Page 3 August 6, 2004 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 12. All grassed or swaled drainage ways must have a minimum slope of 2 %. 13. Proposed storm sewer shall be adjusted to extend to the foot of the south driveway to pick up drainage, as previously expressed. 14. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining permits from the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for the water and sanitary sewer installations as required. 15. All street restoration shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes. 16. The lighting layout, number of lights, and type of fixture is subject to the approval of the City of Lino Lakes. • DF L CEMETERY 2SUB.- NO. TRACT A TRACT C R.L.S. 182 4MEMEMICIEW NOV MARSHAIN CINNAMON TEAL COURT ELM -STREET U 4 24 4 23 5 22 6 21 V 9 0-5 AT V DO. I 15 2 1/3 VE 13 12 11 3/3 er sLA NE. 9 7 /0 18 ENV OUTLOT A RKVIEW 3 RICE LAKE Sty cell & Madson, Inc. Engineering Planning Soil Testing • Environmental Services wmaehoetnedwncom 013580 Wayzata Botgevarck &lle 1 554 11(8 Street NW, Stile 100 hireapota 1.4rn eota 55305 -1525 Ek Fiver, 1Ar eeofa 55330'14(19 thane (952) 545-7801- tar (952) 546-9065 phony (783) 241-0106 - tar (952) 546-9065 13.35' 41.to \ 1 24 314.19' 60.00' 16 60.00' 17 60.00' 24 60.00 18 60.00' 19 60.00' 00 44' DRAINAGE AND m ---UZUTY EASEMENT co + :., I ` \- L, 44, __,9 - 11Wy. 30' 60' H F 0 z w� w Z < o w /I /1p' CI NQ` 9) JU YO BUILDING SETBACKS: C.S.A.H. No. 23 (LAKE DRIVE) - 40 ft. min AQUA LANE - 30 ft. min. AQUA CIRCLE - 25 ft. min. PERIMETER - 30 ft. PRIVATE STREET TO GARAGE DOORS - 20 ft min SIDE (Building separation ) - 25 ft min SITE AREAS: GROSS AREA 176,361.76 sq. ft. 4.05 acres ROW DEDICATION. 9,392.45 sq. ft. 0.21 acres NET AREA 166,969.31 sq. ft. 3.84 acres IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - 35.6% OPEN AREA - 50.5% Zoned: R -4 Guide Plan: Med Density Request to Rezone to PUD SITE DENSITY: TOTAL UNITS = 23 NET DENSITY = 23/4.05 = 5.6 UNITS /ACRE LAKE DRIVE DEDICATION NET DENSITY = 23/3.84 = 6.0 UNITS /ACRE LOT AREAS: LOT /BLK 1/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 2/1 Area. 1,939.80 sq. ft. 0.0445 acres LOT /BLK 3/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 4/1 Area: 2.620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 5/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 6/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 7/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 8/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 9/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 10 /1 Area 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 11 /1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 12/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 13/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 14/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 15/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 16/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 17/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 18/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 19/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 20/1 Area. 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 21/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 22/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 23/1 Areal 2,620.20 sq. ft. 0.0601 acres LOT /BLK 24/1 Areal 107,385.11 sq. ft. 2.465 acres DESCRIPTION: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON SHEET 2 of 11 LEGEND BOUNDARY UNE DENOTES PROPOSED EASEMENTS DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK Soil Type . ZMA, ZMB = Zimmerman Fine Sand 7t C 2004 L��3o LAKES 0 30 60 90 SCALE BENCHMARK: IN FEET Top Nut Hydrant in N.W. quadrant of the intersection of Aqua Lone and Aqua Circle. Elevation = 897.27 feet (N.G.V.D. 1929) l P Ao ?oa 0 70.91 60.00 60.00 24 EASEMEAND \ LAKE DRIVE DEDICATION ■ (1-o. 60.00' 12 50.00' 13 50.00' I 60.00 14 30.00' 15 50.00' 44' DRAINAGE AND L7i1LLTY EASEMENT t/i/ • sr A Revisions Date: Description: 5/05/04 REVISED PLAT By: Date: Description: By: DVD 6/21/04 REVISED PIAT RFD 7/30/04 REVISED PICT DPD I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. fi< o u42 Kenneth Adolf Date: 5/05/04 Reg No 12 Designed Of KA Drown Of DFD Checked Of KA Cant Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 Istentl Street N.E. Blaine MN. 55434 17631 786 -3130 Name/Loca8ae Marshan Townhomss 2nd Addtlen Lino Lakes, Mlnnssota Sheet The PRELIMINARY PLAT Date 5 /05/04 1 4of11 wt cn 0 CD 0 CD S a c Schoell & Madson, Inc. Engineering • Surveying • Planning Soil Testing • Environmental Services wawsefwernada«taan 110580 Wayzata Boulevard, Rule 1 554 Thad Street NW, Stile 100 I 'meapoks, limeade 55305 -1525 9 River, to nesota 55330 -1409. .9a,a: (9521549 -7601 - ter (952) 546 -9065 ph0ne' 0763) 241.0106 - lar (952) 546-9065 /r lr r A -2 li ~�'"�•�4yY`_7ykS ji fi 8k 4 0 - 075 ® LANDSCAPE NOTES • ALL LANDSCAPE TREES, SHRUB, GROUNDCOVERS AND SOD AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. • SOD AND IRRIGATE ALL DISTURBED AREAS. • ALL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS WITH PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE IRRIGATED. • REFER TO LANDSCAPE DETAIL SHEET FOR GENERAL PLANTING NOTES. IRRIGATION NOTES, PLANTING DETAILS. REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR GRADES AND EROSION CONTROL LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SHOP DRAWING OF IRRIGATION PLAN TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. ALL SHRUB BEDS AND TO RECIEVE 3" SHREDDED HARW00D MULCH, AND TREES TO RECIEVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MUCLH. • REMOVE WIRING, TWINE OR ROPES AND BURLAP FROM THE TOP AND SIDES OF THE ROOT BALL FOR BALLED AND BURLAPPED PLANTS. � t•i • n, I • i Cc` ,' • REMOVE CONTAINERS AND CUT CIRCLING ROOTS IF PLANTS ARE CONTAINER GROWN. • HEAVY COMMERCIAL GRADE EDGING SHALL BE USED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER MASSINGS • ALL TREES NOT IN PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE MULCH RINGS 3' IN DIA. • IF PLANTS ARE TO BE PRUNED, BRANCHES SHALL BE PRUNED AT THE BRANCH BARK RIDGE, NOT FLUSH WITH THE BARK. • MULCH DEPTH SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF FOUR INCHES, AND SHALL BE KEPT AT LEAST TWO INCHES AWAY FROM THE STEM OF THE TREES. • THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO THE SITE CAUSED. BY THE PLANTING OPERATION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. • ALL PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE FERTILIZER AS FOLLOWS: •0 -0 -20 GRANULAR FERTILIZER APPLIED AT THE TIME OF PLANTING AT A RATE OF 12 02 PER 2.5 CALIPER INCHES OF TREE AND 6 OZ PER SHRUB. •10 -0 -10 FERTILIZER APPLIED THE FOLLOWING SPRING AT SAME RATE. 1 ` S I 0 O 0 AS um SUGGESTED PLANT SCHEDULE CODE QTY COMMON NAME /LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS A 18 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER Acer ir freemonii 'Jeffersred CAL. AND FULL CROWN B 9 NORTHERN PIN OAK 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER Ouercus ellipsoidalis CAL. AND FULL CROWN C 8 PATMORE GREEN ASH 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER Erasmus pennsylvanico "Potmore" CAL. AND FULL CROWN D 6 RED OAK 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER Ouercus rubro CAL. AND FULL CROWN E 10 HARVEST GOLD CRABAPPLE 1.5" B &B MULTI -STEM TREEFORM Betulo z 'Crimson Frost' CAL. AND FULL CROWN F 14 THORNLESS HAWTHORN 1.5" B &B MULTI -STEM TREEFORM Crateogus crusgalli vor, inermis CAL._ AND FULL CROWN G 15 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Picea glauco 'densota' HT H 10 COLORADO SPRUCE 6' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Piceo pungens HT I 15 WHITE PINE 6' CONT FULL FORM TO GRADE Pinus strobus HT OUANTIT ES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTORS CONVENIENCE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN. White Spruce Unknown IIIL;N III III C NM PLANT LEGEND OVERSTORY DECIDUDOUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREES CONIFER TREES SHRUBS \GROUNDCOVER - 1_ Revisions Date: Description: By: Dale: Description: By: 7 -30 -04 Revisions _ PDS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota. Scott Bilben Date: 5/05/04 Reg. No. 40647 Tip /Jv! / ti 2004 -'' TY of Designed BY SAY Drown 6y: SAY Checked By 0640 N0 • 49) AVG. 2.5° DIA. AVG. 1.5" DIA. AVG. HT 6' 0 SCALE 30 60 a -aka IN WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES. CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. AVG. HT 18" 90 FEET Giant Hokanson Development, Inc. 9174 Istoriti Street N.E. Blaine MN, 55434 (763) 786 -3130 Project Name/Location Morshan Townhomes 2nd Addtion Lino Lakes, Minnesota Sheet Title LANDSCAPE PLAN Dale' 5/05/04 11 01 SMl Project Number: 63506 -004 all 67°4 tec a., i �HWII TERS OME ESIGN tmpw-ca 09. acr mom sr I=Am • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V. D Jeff Schoenbauer, Brauer and Associates August 11, 2004 Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail Plan Jeff Schoenbauer of Brauer and Associates has prepared the City's new Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail Plan. This plan lays out an important new direction by establishing goals in open space planning, which require some new approaches to development review. Mr. Schoenbauer will present the plan to the P & Z. Staff is requesting a recommendation from the P & Z that the City Council approve the new plan. • • • AGENDA ITEM V. E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: August 11, 2004 TOPIC: Preliminary Plat Fox Den Acres BACKGROUND Royal Oaks Realty has requested approval of single family residential development called Fox Den Acres. This is a new submittal of a plan that is different from the previous design reviewed several months ago. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density residential use and it is zoned R -1. The site is in the existing MUSA. A public hearing is required for a preliminary plat. Unfortunately, staff neglected to publish a public hearing notice for this meeting. This was an accidental oversight by City staff, for which we apologize. We will publish the public hearing notice for the September meeting. We typically do not recommend approval until we receive the preliminary approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District. We have not received Watershed approval for this project. In addition, there are some design issues that must be addressed. Therefore, staff would be recommending continuing the project to the September meeting. The City soon will approve a new "Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trails System Plan." Creating greenways is the first priority of the plan. This will require the use of a variety of strategies, the most important of which is greater reliance on a conservation development approach to land development. The comprehensive plan envisions a conceptual greenway along this south and east edge of this site. This project could be a good example of conservation development with some minor, though important revisions. This will require the cooperation of the City, the developer, and the Rice Creek Watershed District. Staff is discussing with the Watershed District how best to pursuit a conservation development on this project. The developer is not yet convinced that such an approach is advantageous or worthwhile. • Fox Den Acres page 2 ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site vacant 40 acres: Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 North radio tower and other communication facilities Low Density Unsewered and Sewered Residential R -1 South wetland Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural East wetland Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural West single family residential Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 The majority of the site, the 40 -acre square, is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential land use (up to three units per acre), is within the stage 1 growth area (pre2010), is in the MUSA, and is zoned R -1. Although the proposed plat extends beyond the 40 acres, the areas outside of the 40 acres would be used only for stormwater ponding and open space. The following is a summary of the of the proposal's density: Gross Site Area 50 acres Upland Area 38 acres Total Lots 56 Gross Density 1.12 units /acre Net Density 1.47 units /acre Growth Management: MUSA Reserve: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy establish a specific number of MUSA acres for residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The area of the site to be built on is within the current MUSA. No MUSA reserve is needed. Growth Management, Units /Year: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy establish a specific number of dwelling units of residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The goal is 147 per year. The City Council has the flexibility to exceed the limit by 20% (29 units) in a year without amending the comprehensive plan. The goal for 2004 has been exceeded and the additional 20% also has been used. This means that additional new development cannot be final platted in 2004. This applies to this project. As seen in the table at the end of this report, 133 lots have been approved for year 2005. No more than 43 lots could be allowed for year 2005 if other applications proceed. The "proposed" • Fox Den Acres page 3 projects are listed roughly in order of application. However, they do not have a right to develop in 2005 until they receive preliminary plat approval. Lots: Minimum lot width is 80', minimum lot depth is 135'. All lots meet these requirements. The minimum lot size in an R -1 zone is 10,800 sf, and this must be contiguous land. There are several lots with non - contiguous upland areas. It is not clear that these lots would meet the area requirement without the non - contiguous portion. This must be clarified for Lot 5, Block 1 and Lot 4, Block 2. In addition, several lots have house pads squeezed in very carefully. In and of itself, this is not a problem. However, there are many wetland areas that require drainage and utility easements around them. The subdivision ordinance requires an easement that extends at least ten feet beyond a delineated wetland. Several house pads would be within the easement if the easement were enlarged to meet this requirement. This must be re- examined by the developer on the plans and the easements enlarged in several areas. For example, Lots 3 and 5, Block 1; Lot 4, Block 2; and Lot 6, Block 4. As explained below, it would be possible to retain some greenway along the outer edges of this site and make progress on the creation of a greenway corridor. This may require flexibility on lot sizes. If the gain to the environment is worth it, lots that are somewhat smaller than the minimum requirements would be justified flexibility. Streets, Access, Parking: Fox Road is the only access point for this site. Extending Fox Rd. as proposed would exceed the maximum cul de sac length of 500' unless a future outlet /connection is included. Wetland extends to the east and south for more than 1000', so a road cannot go in those directions. There is no possible additional connection on the west because the existing homes of Reshanau Lake Estates South 4th Addn. (Hindsight shows that Deerwood Lane should have been designed to provide a connection to the east at its southern end instead of curving west into a cul de sac. This is no longer an option, however.) The 500' radio tower on the north is likely to stay. The proposed road stub to the north of the plat avoids the tower property. Land to the north of the stub does have on it several communication facilities such as satellite dishes and the like, but nothing so imposing as the tall tower. It is possible that a road could extend to the north where pictured if these facilities were removed in the future. That area includes upland, though it is impossible to know how much without a delination of that property. A "ghost plat" of the area shows it will be possible to fit in a road and some lots. Fox Road leads to Deerwood Lane and West Shadow Lake Drive. Both lead to Birch St. Deerwood is a local street, West Shadow Lake Drive is a collector which runs from Birch St. to 6211d St., both of which are collectors. The street names on the plat likely will be changed. Emergency service personnel have expressed concern on other projects that have similar street names. It makes it difficult to locate properties in an urgent situation. • • • Fox Den Acres page 4 Traffic: The developer submitted a traffic study with the previous application for 64 lots. The original study did not reconize the completion of West Shadow Lake Drive through to 62nd St. or the reconstruction of 62nn St. The amended study takes into account the current and planned roadways. The result is that the Birch St. approach and intersection will continue to operate at a level of service C. With fewer lots, there will be less traffic generated by the project. Parks, Open Space: The proposal includes 10.98 acres of "green corridor" (Outlot A). The 1992 park plan does not anticipate a park in this location. The City soon will approve a new "Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trails System Plan." Creating greenways is the first priority of the plan. This will require the use of a variety of strategies, the most important of which is greater reliance on a conservation development approach to land development. The draft new open space plan does envision a greenway across part of the site, and leading to Birch Park to the east. A greenway is a corridor of protected open space managed for conservation and recreational purposes. The comprehensive plan includes a greenway map (see attached detail). The City has no automatic ownership rights within areas envisioned as greenways. Greenway corridors on the map are conceptual and are to be refined through the development review process. It would be possible to retain some greenway along the outer edges of this site and make progress on the creation of a greenway corridor. The proposed plan offers Outlot A. This area does not offer as much toward preservation open space as would be possible with some creativity and design flexibility. Staff would prefer pursuing such possibilities. Our park plan consultant has been communicating with the developer on these possibilities. The Park Board discussed the project at its May 3rd meeting and recommended only a cash dedication. The subdivision ordinance includes park dedication requirements. Park dedication is $1665 per residential unit. The Park Board's view was that the proposed park is marginal land and can't be used for active park purposes. Utilities: Sanitary sewer and water service will connect to existing facilities in Fox Road. Both are adequate to serve the project. Grading and Stormwater Management: Stogy nwater ponds will be created in several locations on the site. Some revisions to house pad elevation will be necessary to meet minimum elevation above groundwater. The subdivision ordinance requires an easement that extends at least ten feet beyond a delineated wetland. This must be corrected. Easements also must be platted along all the external property lines. The project requires the approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District. This has not been obtained. • Fox Den Acres page 5 Existing City Easement: The project also proposes the partial vacation of an existing ponding and flowage easement held by the City. This easement covers most of the land to the east and south of the site, which comprises a large wetland area. The easement area to be vacated is on Lots 3 -6, Block 4. The City looks carefully at requests to vacate such easements. We require that the applicant prove that the easement is not necessary and that the vacation will have no negative effect. If a revised project design incorporates more greenway preservation, this easement vacation may not be necessary. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application on July 28. Recommendations are attached. The recommendations include pursuing a conservation development, with design flexibility, to facilitate a greenway corridor along the south and east sides of the site. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the preliminary plat • 2. Deny the preliminary plat. 3. Table the item. RECOMMENDATION Option 3, and the following issues must be addressed: A conservation development approach that results in higher quality wetland areas and adequate greenway buffers around them would be the preferred approach. This would be consistent with the draft open space plan, the comprehensive plan, and the 1999 handbook for environmental planning. If this is not going to happen, the project still must address the following: Minimum lot areas must include contiguous land. Easements around wetlands must extend ten feet beyond the delineated wetland. House pads must not be in easements. Stormwater ponds design and other engineering issues must be revisited. • • O CV. 7 45 U) ca O> X a O ..- N CO M , O O O N O N LO O) N T T (O LO 0 T CO 1521 N T T T •;}' N O T N CO r O O CO T CO N (.0 LO M LO CO Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) O O O N O O O O N O O O N CO CO VI CI CO O 0 N 43 N CO LO 'Cr O N t- O O N N Li-) r l() O T N N T CO r CO N T T CD ti e O O N 65 T O O O I� T V' N Cc) M O O N 52 ( 0 co x--0 r 1 22 N T T CO !}• T year end 2002 T LC) 51 E 115 L d 0- co O T O 249 T O 56 O T CO N it) T N O T T c}• N O T N 161 CO T M N co LC) Development Name approved prelim. plats IStoneybrook C -0 Q -0 C N (Century Farms North Keefe: prel plat, not final plat Morton (minor subdiv) Ravens Hollow Haley Manor (10 new lots) Crystal Cove Millers Crossroads Lakeview Estates (2 new) Snell (minor subdivision) Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th Justin's Preserve Marshan Estates Rice Creek Church duplex Rice Church: Oakwood View Junes Addn Highland Meadows East 2nd -O a) 0 0 O Q 'Pheasant Hills 12th island 1 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add Marshan Townhomes 2nd Fox Den Acres (resubmittal) 'total ti N- N C) O) O) N N 0 O T ti O O O N 2 A Q -0 T L N- To ‘ T c y C N O C 0 (6 r 4) — O O " 0) 01 — C C Li.) C .E .0 N U co .O O N E E O C2 N 2 N TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaitray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.cor To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Engineering Review of Copies To: Fox Den Acres City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Owner/Developer: Royal Oaks Realty Date: July 30, 2004 Comm. No. 12976 -002 A review for the above proposed development was previously provided in a Memorandum dated April 8, 2004. Revised documents have been received as follows: 1. Full -size and half -size Plan sets (six sheets) that include the following: a. Certificate of Survey dated March 10, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc.). b. Resource Inventory Survey dated July 9, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc.). c. Preliminary Plat dated July 9, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc.). d. Grading Plan dated July 9, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc and Plowe Engineering, Inc.). e. Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan dated July 9, 2004 (E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc.). f. Preliminary Utility Plan dated July 9, 2004 (Plowe Engineering, Inc.). 2. Minimum Basement Elevation Table (Based on July 9, 2004 Grading Plan). 3. Storm Sewer Design and Pipe Calculation. Worksheet, received by the City of Lino Lakes July 12, 2004. 4. HydroCad Calculation Sheets and Drainage Area Maps (Existing and Proposed), prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated July 9, 2004. 5. Fire Flow Analysis for Fox Den Acres, prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated July 9, 2004. 6. Geotechnical Report provided by Carl Anderson Engineering, P.A., dated July 22, 2004. 7. Technical Memorandum from TDI, dated July 29, 2004, Revision to Fox Den Acres Traffic Impact Report General 1. The proposed project area is located south of Birch Street and east of Deerwood Lane, at the east termination point of Fox Road. The total property area is 50 acres. It is proposed to install streets, sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer to serve 56 single family residential units. This is a revision from the 64 units originally proposed. This reduction appears to be from the elimination of units previously located in Parcel B which is located outside of the MUSA service area. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Engineering Review Page 2 July 30, 2004 Fox Den Acres fraCity of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 2. As a result of the plan revision, the site layout, grading, stormwater routing, and utilities have been adjusted in some locations. Revised drainage calculations have also been submitted. 3. Of the 50 acres, approximately 75% is upland or developable, while the remainder is pockets of wetlands scattered throughout the property or portions of DNR Wetland No. 565P, which borders the south and east edge of the properties. According to the information provided, the Ordinary High Water Level of the wetland is 893.0, and the Flood Zone limits have been indicated on the survey in accordance with the local Flood Insurance Rate Map, dated May 17, 1982. A ponding and flowage easement in favor of the City of Lino Lakes (Document No. 595478), corresponding roughly to the Flood Zone limits, is also indicated on the Plan. A Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) will ultimately be required to perform the improvements as proposed. 4. A Resource Inventory Survey has also been prepared for this site. The site is generally undulating with mixtures of wooded areas, pasture, and wetlands. According to records of a Soil Survey by the USDA Soil Conservation service, the soils are generally fine sands and fine sandy loarns with the exception of areas of muck in the vicinity of the lower flood plain areas. A Geotechnical Report as referenced above has also been provided and provides the following observations of note: a) b) Glacial outwash deposits of fine sand dominate the area. In the lowland areas, a black organic topsoil has developed, varying in thickness from 1 to 3.25 feet at the test pits. The total thickness of organic topsoil in the lowland areas was not explored. This should especially be taken into consideration where utilities and roadways traverse through lowland areas. c) The majority of test pits and test borings exhibited soil mottling which was used to assist in determining seasonal high ground water levels. Grading and Drainage 1. A General Stormwater Discharge Permit, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), will be required in accordance with the most current requirements of NPDES Phase II and State of Minnesota regulations. All NPDES regulations and requirements in accordance with the MPCA shall be adhered to, including submittal to the City of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). 2. Sedimentation and Erosion Control must be enforced at all times during the course of all grading and utility work. This includes the establishment of silt fence around all graded and disturbed areas, and the sweeping of streets on a regular basis, and as directed by the City. As per RCWD requirements, the grading plan must also be revised to specify inlet protection for the proposed catch basins. In the event the Contractor does not maintain erosion control as required, any costs incurred by the City as a result will be withheld from escrows or other monies due. It is strongly suggested that a note be added to all construction plan sheets (including grading, streets, and utilities) reminding the Contractor to address erosion control requirements. Engineering Review Page 3 July 30, 2004 Fox Den Acres City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 3. The Grading Plan indicates that wetlands shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio per requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act. The Plans also must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). A permit application has been submitted to RCWD (Permit No. 04 -039, dated March 12, 2004). RCWD has determined the application to be Incomplete, pending the receipt of several additional items. All requirements of the RCWD must be met. 4. Minimum grades and slopes must be provided and shown on the Plans as follows: 0.5% for streets (including curb and gutter), and 2.0% for turfed/non -paved areas including all swales and slopes. It would appear that in some locations, the street is less than 0.5% grade. 5. Proposed house pad information, including floor elevations are provided on the Plans, including the City's requirements for floor elevations. The minimum lowest floor must be the greater of 2 feet above the HWL, 4 feet above the NWL, 4 feet above the groundwater elevation, and 1-foot above the emergency overflow. Emergency overflows are shown for the majority of site's landlocked low areas. However, the emergency overflow location and elevations must also be clearly shown for all detention areas, including newly constructed infiltration basins and stormwater detention ponds. A table providing minimum basement elevations for all properties has been provided. The grading plan also provides a house pad detail that explains the housing style and proposed finish grade elevations. It should be noted that the detail specifies that for Walkout homes the finished basement floor is to be 0.3 above the elevation provided on the grading plan. The table figures do not reflect this for many of the properties, and should be adjusted accordingly. At least some of the proposed units do not appear to meet the minimum 4 feet separation from the NWL and groundwater elevations, based upon the mottling information provided. These include Lot 3, Block 5; Lot 3, Block 3 and Lots 18 and 19 Block 3. It is strongly recommended that all house pad elevations again be reviewed and adjusted accordingly. The Grading Plans shall also specify that all house pads on filled areas shall be designed by a registered Professional Engineer (per geotechnical recommendations) and approved by the City of Lino Lakes. 6. A Certified As -built Survey shall be provided by the Developer's Engineer upon completion of grading, certifying that all grading complies with the Grading Plan. This Certification shall be required prior to the issuance of any building permits. Final certification that the grading meets City requirements for adequate drainage and minimum slopes will be required prior to the issuing of building permits. Percent grades shall be shown on the Plan. 7. Revised drainage calculations and drainage area maps have been received and reviewed. Comments are as follows: a) As stated in the previous review, the discharge rates from the proposed 2 -,10 -, and 100 - year design rainfall events cannot exceed the existing discharge rates. The two year design as submitted does not meet this requirement. It is recommended that a discharge rate comparison table be prepared and provided, showing the revised discharge rate calculations. Engineering Review Page 4 July 30, 2004 Fox Den Acres I. City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 8. The outlet structures for Pond 4 and Pond 5 will require adjustment. The Pond 4 structure is not buildable based upon the elevations provided. For Pond 5, the cover over the outlet pipe is 2 inches. A 6 -inch minimum cover is required per City requirements. Streets and Trails 1. Access to this property is proposed from only one location, from Fox Road just east of its intersection with Deerwood Lane. This essentially results in a very large "cul -de -sac" or single point access for the entire Development. The extension of Fox Road through the property considers further extension to the north in the future. However, it is unknown at this time when and if such a second access into the site would happen. Traffic levels of service, safety, and impacts to existing streets and intersections shall be addressed to the City's satisfaction. Comments regarding the Traffic Study are provided further in this report. 2. The City's Comprehensive Plan provides for a regional trail linkage between Reshanau Lake Estates and Birch Park in this area. It is recommended that provisions for the trail link be investigated further as part of this Development. 3. The street layout as proposed on the Preliminary Plat appears to attempt to limit impacts to existing wetlands. However, some filling of wetlands is proposed, and mitigation will be required. As previously mentioned, the Plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District in accordance with the Wetland Conservation Act. 4. Prior to any grading or construction, the street and trail plans shall be further detailed for construction purposes as required by the City of Lino Lakes. This would include typical street sections, pavement sections required, street widths, radii, type of curb, etc. As mentioned in comments under Utilities, a Detail Sheet that includes all applicable City standard plates and additional requirements of the City must be provided. 5. The cul -de -sac at the north end of the subdivision on Fox Road is not the full size per City engineering standard requirements(92' diameter). However, it is recognized that this cul -de -sac may be considered temporary, pending extension of Fox Road to the north at a later date. The cul -de -sac as proposed may therefore be considered acceptable. 6. At least some of the street horizontal curves do not meet the maximum 30 mph speed limit for residential streets. This is more of a concern where a street is a through street or carries higher volumes of traffic. It is recommended that streets be signed (curves, advisory speed, etc.) as may be needed, consistent with City of Lino Lakes practices. 7. At some locations, the 0.5% minimum street grade does not appear to be attained. Utility Plan 1. It is proposed to connect sanitary sewer to an existing 10 -inch sanitary sewer stub that extends easterly from the intersection of Fox Road and Deerwood Drive. As stated on the plan, it is recommended that the location and elevation of the stub be field verified. The rim elevation for MH 18 appears to be incorrect. Engineering Review Page 5 July 30, 2004 Fox Den Acres ID City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 2. It is proposed to connect 8 -inch watermain pipe from an existing stub extending from the intersection of Deerwood Drive and Fox Road. It is recommended that the size and location of the stub be verified. 3. Adequate water pressure and circulation into the proposed Development shall be verified by the Developer, as there is no loop or secondary feed available to serve the Development. A Fire Flow Analysis has therefore been provided. The Analysis has been reviewed, and the distribution system proposed is adequate. However, the 6 -inch diameter mains serving the cul -de -sacs must be sized to 8- inches per City requirements. 4. The utility plan as submitted shall be considered preliminary for review and not considered a final document for construction purposes. Final utility plans shall include the following: a. Plan and Profile sheets for all sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer. b. Notes addressing private utilities, and erosion and sedimentation control must be provided on the Utility Plan. c. A note shall be provided on the Utility Plan stating that utility installations shall meet the requirements of the Standard Specifications of the City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) and the City of Lino Lakes. d. Information shall be provided on the Plans showing the location of individual services for sanitary sewer and water, including stationing and elevations. 5. The geotechnical report provided is not specific with regards to addressing the installation of utilities and the streets. It would appear that the soils are generally capable of supporting the proposed infrastructure with some corrections needed in some areas, particularly at low areas where wetlands are intended to be filled, and wet and substandard material may be encountered. The geotechnical report should address this further. In addition, substantial dewatering for utilities may also be necessary in many locations, depending upon the seasonal level of groundwater. 6. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Permit for watermain installation and MPCA/MCES Sanitary Sewer Permit, upon completion of the Utility Plans and prior to construction. 7. The Developer shall provide a televised inspection tape of all sanitary sewer pipes upon completion of the roadway and utilities. Any subsequent cleaning of the sewer pipes after construction shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 8. The number and location of all hydrants and gate valves shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Fire Chief. Trench and roadway compaction shall meet the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, including 100% of Standard Proctor Density for the upper three feet directly beneath the roadway, and 95% of Standard Proctor from utility encasement zone to three feet below the surface. As stated in previous reviews, it is critical that geotechnical information and direction be followed as construction activities •9 Engineering Review Page 6 July 30, 2004 Fox Den Acres ipCity of Lino Lakes, Minnesota progresses. It is recommended that a geotechnical investigation be conducted, and that a geotechnical consultant be utilized throughout construction. 10. The Utility Plan is incomplete with regards to storm sewer information, including pipe sizes, materials, slopes, structure elevations and inverts, etc. 11. The inverts at Manhole (in and out), appear to be 0.10 feet too low, and should be re- checked. Details A Detail Sheet must be provided that includes all applicable City of Lino Lakes standard plates. Additional information shall also be included on the Utility Plans and/or the Detail Sheet as follows: Gate Valves shall be Mueller A- 2370 -20 with mechanical joints, meeting AWWA Specifications C500 -61. Valve Boxes shall be Mueller H -10357 with H -10361 drop lid, and extensions shall be Mueller H- 10363. Hydrants shall be Waterous Pacer WB -67 with a bury depth of 8' - 6 ". Services shall be Type "K" copper with Mueller H- 15000 corp stop. Curb stop and curb box shall be Mueller H -15154 Mark 2 oraseal, and Mueller H -1300 w/Mpls. Top. Storm sewer details and standard plates (including structures and outlets) shall also be provided. Traffic A Traffic Report for Fox Den Acres has been prepared by TDI, March 2004. The Report was subsequently q Y amended in a TDI Memorandum dated April 14, 2004. The Report was also revised in a Memorandum dated July 29, 2004 to reflect the reduction in the proposed number of residential units from 64 to 56. The report essentially addresses expected impacts to Deerwood Lane, the intersection of Deerwood Lane with County Road 10, and impacts to newly constructed West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd Street. Regarding the intersection of County Road 10 and Deerwood Lane, the report states that the Level of Service (LOS) of the Deerwood Lane northbound approach currently operates at LOS C and will continue to operate at LOS C under the year 2009 no -build scenario. In summary, the expected traffic impact on access points and the surrounding neighborhood streets is expected to be minimal as a result of added traffic generated by Fox Den Acres. Other Issues In accordance with City requirements, a Landscaping Plan shall be submitted. The Tree Preservation Plan shall be subject to further review and approval of the City. • Memo To: Jeff Smyser CC: Michael Grochala From: Marty Asleson Date: August 5, 2004 Re: Recommendations of the July 28, 2004 Environmental Board Environmental The Environmental Board met on July 28, 2004 and made the following recommendations: Fox Den Acres Carried forward from March 28th Environmental Board review • That the development be considered as a PUD and /or Conservation Development that would allow for a variety in lot sizes and street widths. • Suggest that the developer work with the Saddle Club site, or look at purchasing the Saddle Club site, for developing with the Fox Den Acres site so that the two sites could be developed concurrently. • That the proposed NURP and infiltration ponds be evaluated for adequate separation and infiltration to the seasonally high water table. • That the developer works with staff to identify trees that can be saved in buffer areas, and designated clear areas. • That the development should allow for the creation of a greenway corridor from the southwest, and East Side of the development proposal. • That no soils should be imported or exported without city approval. • Soil protection areas should be designated and fenced off. • • • Rock entrances should have additional stockpile of rock on hand to top dress entrances when initial rock entrance fills. • Storm water from roofs and back yards should follow some sort of a designed treatment train before water flows into existing wetlands. • The developer should be required to use the City native seed mix, in NUPR and infiltration pond, restoration work. That the seeding of these areas be accomplished with the services of an approved contractor that is knowledgeable in native plant restoration. That the developer be required to hire such a native plant contractor to manage the restoration areas for a minimum of three years. From the July 28th Environmental Board Meeting Recommend conditional approval with the following conditions: • A willingness of the developer to work with the City on investigating the conservation development approach as an alternative approach to the Preliminary Plat. • Recommend the services of Jeff Schoenbauer of Brauer and Associates to assist the city with this alternative approach. • Rice Creek Watershed approval. • Add a buffer area along the west sides of the property. Motion to approve Environmental Board recommendations by Bauman, second by Smith. All were in favor. • RESHANAU L. BIRCH STREET C.S.AH. 10 CC G w -J -J 0 4 a N r w w J 0 2ND A COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF -WAY PLAT NO. II 12 13 II OLD 14I %1 Nbt BEM/ rR. 0 L D BIRCH CT. 10 II rR @v oa Mt 4 114yA■ 41a II 3 7 W 2 Q 3 4 5 STR T • PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • • Low Density Sewered Residential Low Density Unsewered Residential ZONING MAP DETAIL • • PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN WITH GREENWAYS (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • • olv c,s NOPINKS7 (.12.5 worm II AS • / a 0 e9 sDi o N80'52.21"W o 1307.07 0 • 0 0 1. 4. 0 0 . i O.* • .f C.4000 4 589°5221"E 450.00 0 - .xV CERTIFICATE OP SURVE'r 0 OF: FOX DEN ACRES 8;B 0 FOR• ROYAL OAKS REALTY (OWNER & DEVELOPER) 1000 _COUNTY ROAD E. WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVI.EW MN 55126 PHONE: (651)-483-5518 .• • N69'49754% 31f.05.-- 1931 1 140%11). Orlit MY 0, 6.1. 40.0 ISOM -', N8953'21W •-••-: 546.06 00 • • o 00 Cer 0 • '"*. . . ../.1 0 . • • - 0 / ,1143c,\ /• „, FXISTING PROPERTY D.T.SCRIPTIONS VeR 601.M.m. A OA SWAG° Tirbe b19.0ANS common crawornesbn Tex. • . .••••• eel VICINITY MAP .• • •• GRAPHIC SCALE tw NITET) =eh 00 It ANOKA COUNTY, NITVIESOTA 6,107 TO SCALE) PARTS CP 33. TINP.31, RNR. 0 Parcel A: 0 - The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Parcel B: That part of the Northeast Ouerter of the Northwest Quarter at Section 33, Township 31, 7) Range 22. Anoka County. Minnesota described as beginning at the Northwest comet of • Quarter of Mt Northwest Quarter a distance of 450.00 feet; thence South 15 degrees 53 52 minutes 21 seconds East, aseumed bearing, along the north line at sold Northeast said Northeast Warier of the Northwest Quarter at Section 33: thence South 89 degrees minutes 24 seconds West 10138.32 feet: thence North 89 egress 52 .minutes 21 seconds ' • g thence North 00 degrees 44 minutes 23 seconds West along salt west line a distance of West 165.00 feel to tne west line of said Northeast Oucrter of the Northwest Duane, ).,-, 14r• " • ,97.111, CI to the paint of beginning. v3 " • -. That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Ouorter of Section 33, Township 31. Runge 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as beginning at the Northwest corner of • said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Warier of Section 33: thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 28 seconds Cam, assumed bearing, along the north line of mid Southwest Snorter of the Northwest Quarter o distance 011304.74 feet to the Northeast corner of sold Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Gun-ten thence South 25 degrees 18 minutes 53 seconds West 387.05 feet; thence North 22 degrees 00 minutes 26 seconds Wee a distance of 377.62 feet to said north line: thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 28 seconds Wee) along said north Into a distance of 33E74 feet; thence South 64 degrees 53 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 729.37 feet to the wrest line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence North 00 degrees 50 minutes 22 seconds West along said west line 310.0D feet to the point of beginning. ..... ---.7_,........________2„ ..e- • '' --,./: 4-,_ -J, ••,-. . , • ti- , -■34 •wet-„e 4-3.0 . "ts,' . . • 8 0 _ tft w 8 - 0!t regi5 00 s5-o 9180 L.E NGTON AVENUE NE. GIRCAE PINES, MN. S5014-3625 Tel. 165-15W-5656 Pau 16,6-156-601211 0 PARCEL ZDNED ,--103,063 sq, ft . • s 2.37 acres„ 4'6-4 S s.7‘ j• • . .4 l'-.i,.... j(928-w /(1 89°5728W. ',.. 33474. - •"- - . -.-,' 307.00 .. i/.4-.4.v:--'• .7._ 1.,- --1.- . • ZONED R . A.f:_-!.: ''''.11.4 ... •\ ---•-•-.11,1 n' , ...-4,733:722350.52,,, sft. ---'1 - a.. %.-.7,...- ..._,.K.14;i . • • . .• . ••-e. • - I- 'taco c:)..,,, tv. ,.,-7.--,--,--,1-: - - . - .4.4.4,:nie,ot . - -,..; .- . - 4••;" - . . ..4,• 'Zirp i ' 1 9 9,1, 5 - , ." .4 K.! bess ofTeTer" IV tfi 1-44-44:1--t.:•••••1 . ;J , 56" ' _,.....-A-,„ t-, - - . a • • ,6_ t.....,_,•-e•-... . • -Cliat .C".."iri. - . • ike:5.°4CC6. : ........Cy?f?.. . \ q.,--•:: .. / s'.1* ...., ,>. 1...*.:",:,...: -6. -- • ;0P'. • - • . .- • . . • . • -. . . . .-- - , -, rx. • -. . • ,?, . 44r ! ....., 1. 7 .. :- 4 * / * - - • * .7 .. '`..e■_, . -"11:citec",;' 69-1:?7 • ;IP. .. .. . - .- ...,.. . • - - °'• . 1A.P • * • . . . ' i ril.„...4.4 I - - 2'' • - .;... * - . ,Aes,,gttrs t.,W!,-4,rItva9 , .• _ - . . . ,,....... :1,1,1 r 10 •r, . Denotes Set 1/2 inch by 18 inch iron Pipe Marked by R.L.S. number 25341 LEG:Ma . AREAS, • Denotes found monument • Denotes County Cost Iron Monument Total Boundary Areo - 2,177.945 (50.0 Acres) --.-- Denotes Fence Line per Aerial Photo. Total Upland .. 1,662,427 (35.16 Acres) Denotes Existing Trees per Aerial Photo; see Total Wetland ee 515,519 (17.8 Acres) ‘-'••-•*--)O Resource Myentory for actual tree Iodations. v .4, - : -4 is)rzt: iottiond located by Earth P - Denotes Edge of Wetland by Earth Science Ins 1 Denotes 100 Year Flood Boundary from FEMA Steps C. • . -•••■--•- A proposed LOMA to be submitted to FEMA at time of moss groding. • E.----- Denotes 100 Year Flood Mao from FEW Mops . ',... •••: Denotes Ponding and Flowage Easement per document w•').-d / • c ,' ' ' no. 595478 in favor of the City of Lino Lakes. This •••4--- ... 4--. 1.41-1. .---. --. ---.- - - -,-. -4..,, -.I-t• -easerrrent-cosers-sommmesisling-high-grourrai-ono4v- --4 . - -•• -1 . 1 ( •,-' ...- :3 _ . __. - proposed to be vacated within the FOX DEN ACRES plot '4' •• 1' 'se' 3; to be rededicoted over ponong and hOWOcla areas on boundary. Easements for drainage and utility purposes .J.. `. the final plot, / - .) C.. -; ,.- ••••1., . ,1•1 If ^.. ,- 1 1 ZONING ' •• Y 11 . c.,..... .) • GUIDING, ,, ,5:, i - Parcel A guiding Low Density Single Family. 0 , `„„ - Par.? 0 and C guided -Rural . .. . . • •,' . . ..• I..; -24:17rFe ,*.re ". • - • - • - • 'Vs • SCAM tr,••• teet"'"•14 SONS, 6 s, - .• )47s•- c-. . „,....!:‘ .:7,_,-.....Sr . „ - - .... - - _, _ _ 7.."-: - ‘1,1.1....._•-ip,....5 - s--,., - - -,.... - . .z - - . E .,-, j ,-,..... ,- •..-,4"` , ""1.- . . , ,., 't • • . • ,„,_ e...!..:7; - 1. At 1.1 4.- ..... .-1. '44 " !I' " • .* 7 ". • C ? ,-. ... r ,..4, ? '-‘, . 5 -.. , ., ,.. . • ,- ,••, .2604.64 -Fl..L., S89-5933"W r , • I ( '-' :' k.., / _r 5 S. J SWIM WC 1".11111 /41 OF KOMI 13eNCIAMARK, Da.--izy-th,....r., Ill n-rw. - Parcel A is Zoned R-/ eV co - Parcel B end C are Zoned R. • . Pr" MUSA - Parcel A fell within the MUSA. - Parcel B and C fe0 ...tide, • , N•e MUSA. NOTES - Ordinary hligM Water Lned of wetlands shall be determined upon Final Design. - Boundary areo not shaded is the approximate location of Flood Zone C (area of minimal floodbg) on determined by FIRM. Mop Panel 270075 0100 doted May 17, ;982.. - bearing's shown are on NAD datum. - Wetland located by P.O Rod & Sons Mc (703)-786-5559 on 11-24-03. - Wetland completed by Earth Soignee km (057)-67e-6210 on 9-24-03. - 051. survey cot prepared with Title Commitment by Chicago 171l. Insurance 10580050 - Commitment No. 231913. 971 fef '/Z.e., Prat DESCRIPMON Br CERTIFICATION. I hereby certity Met the survey. plan or report was prepared by Me or under my erect superviNon and Mat I orn o duly Registered Land Surergor under the tows of the Stole of Minnesota "•,:trver.f!,... 104-11J2-ia tr. `Ift corm Kam m f . _ -1,41•CWOO-i- DANIEL W OBERMLLER Date- 10 stil/L 041 ticeeete No _2111L 07-017-0, SteaNOOrr wee w 7 Cf ,— • • 744' Ar89.4....' 21"5' 7.07 .111° 59‘. S6'9°52• 450 • 1;27 " ' . • . • ' Ain FINE • . Di COMA 41w) . • • EOUCE INIVENTOR`r 61..iRVE'r •992 • 'at.. . . ' • AS' 0 ‘' PARCE 5 ZtHEE , ft95D5t. q ft/ ••- 6.79 res MLLE C SAND (77.-4S,SLOPE • (MO .C•EL■ E11R- 8 sq ft. cr•es LE NINE S ONES (Ho OF: FOX DEN ACRES FOR: ROY AL OAKS REALTY (OWNER & DEVELOPER) WOO COUNTY ROAD E. WEST SUI7'E 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 PHONE: (651)-483-5518 N89'.52•21"Ti 546.06 • cp-ATTT, N8E-'49'34't 311.5R•••• ••-• VICINITY MA PARTS OF SEC. 33. TWP. SlANG. 22 GRAPHIC SCALE 11) Irec ) inala BO 71. Denot. Set 7/2 inch by 18 inch Iron ° Pipe Marked by R.L.S. number 41578 • Denotes found monument j?) Denotes County Cast Iron Monument Denotes Pence Line per Aerial Photo Denotes Wetland no Delineated by Earth Science -Denotes Sag Type from Soil Survey by USDA Soil Conservatien Service. See Sand Sok Survey for asscription of soil types. AN SAN / • \ ARKCY. %VCR "CiA0) • - " • ANCKA cousin. NtsPEISOTA NOT TO SCAM CrffialFD 1 JUL 1 2, 2004 I MY UNO L{ES APEAS, Total Boundary Area - 2,177,946 (50.0 Acres) Total Upland - 1,662427 (38.16 Acres) Total Welland - 515.519 (71.8 Acre.) PARCE' I- Q' ,2•BNED R 153,863 sq. / 2.37 9,cres 0Q r Q cz.,..6 / 100•I Tf _ ..... • lc••=', • . • I • • . • I .1 • SSE: 4. 60571; 4,7•:"' 307,00 i CC. ,`C NEB `42 / 725 .1.23 acres 1 1 I , \ /1 .• • :--EiRK LSI< ti, ( , - .- ..._../ i x Prepared By: i -/ tam?. RUZLI: SONS, N . too 1...$)osivrbrsi ..4vaNium NE. \ 'PINES, MINI. 5B014-362: T.I. 163-1E1E-3336 As 163-1/36.6001 S8959•33 .121A..252 Top Nut Hydrant at the Northwest comer of Trappe r s Crop and Holly Drive. Elevation = 913.54 NOTE5. - 6o0r;n9'. shown are an HAD 03 Datum. - Trees tagged by blonde Company (01)-4114-01. on Feb. 5-79 .1 2004. - Trees mooted by E.G. Rod A Sons Inc.. - This survey war prepared with Title Commitment by Chkego Title lotturance Cornpeny. Commitment No. 2.31913. - See Grading Plan and Certificate of Survey for Hydrologic characteristics. NO. Dolt CCSCerettaN sr CE-QTIFICA110N1+ I hereby certify that this survey. plan or report woos prepared by me or- under my direct supervision ono that I arn o duly Registered Lane Surveyor under the laws or the Stole of Minnerato. DANIEL 01. OBERMILLER ootn'4X414 License Na. „. AVIA assanseff, JUL 1 2 2094 MIN Or' LIMO LAKE' \ Y 'SEAIP "w°" ar ,Nwmem'evre.; • '1- --, N89r5121e•W {6 1 ' L Ia S89 •52'21 "E 450.;0 t /iltr 'Irex °` rI I )r['7g s i'RE1. fM f N4R1''��t I males 4Aew s/. 1K tor W ?Zem. (/t seal er MOW 1Mw M e. try' '-1 ,4a OF: FOX DEN ACRES FOR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (OWNER & DEVELOPER) 1000 COUNTY ROAD E. WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 PHONE: (651)- 483 -5518 ti - 669- 49'34aE 371.00.. i' sw acxti 1 / :u• - / NI a1R,s. wok 1. =4� mos actor- • i,t�,�000 89°52k2T "i9 alit >M the ou7 -' • \, 332174' 9 °57128" it x5 m w t.wn ii e6 <:.; f 7::,- ,s;,ha11,{ , : _ w ...4___ , a- 0 t 'O1 • i I t, 1 1 E a '. • Prepared fly: I I j 5 -6R aD 3GN5 INC. 9180 LEXINCs N AVENUE NE. ._CMCLE- PINES, MN. 5501z-862S Tel. 9403 -186 -9866 Fex 10. -J 6 -i,o07 rse r AP _ .84 - S59'59'33 "W 5.00.1 ins w. Meret0Nwa -.- - .- .- .- .- . -. -• -. /r- N89. ,2•T "W 54 6.0C 0,1142 0•,112,2 • • e 1r'/ Preel A'. (39.61 055.1.) 507 / teed oOm:p.e A ce 60000 into lfL9AN E canNoT =Awed IC. zsbnl / EXISTING PROPERTY DESORPTIONS+ Via Nrinwaet Cvmr of ...tame Wales of Snide. 33. Tom., 31, Nonpe 22 Anoka Loud,, Ymn404u Parcel 0 (6.79 be) Mot peel of W. 60.015 W0tr al Ina N. u 1 Wald of Radian 31 Toe,nhp 31, kenos 2� Md:c C.un1y. Y ..etu daaene.o'es 40.901.9 at the Nrinadt a of t World of t0. Northwest 0orler of Sao. T 13: e.ncs Sou.. EP Mdem w 0'1014521. 0 . Nb Lea'. wennd 5u,ne O dan9 1v n en le. c• Winer .. Wert t 1V01.2 a eicWMr el t2Mp eel b Were 9o.v.% 1.0.10. f6 121401:6 mce_mma 21 m • 16060 le r of t0,. of 23 esame, t Warier of the sod lhveft 0140(4* Noe 170.11 Noun tee 4: 050.00 „ *se0.de era 0409 mid .=1 Ine ft distance of 979.11 IM to the Print of beginning. Prat C f 16 Aae.I ince part of lb keetMM Doody 4 IM Nwtho.l 0ueelr .5 Section 33. lo.n.Np. 31. Range 22. endia CsmIs ktm+eolo Moahea os 0.0,01 % at Vie 21050.111 Cana of 5wtnm.l Wane of the 1106 0,1boorae Cl Stets. 33, 150.0o South, !0 400500, Void mimics 28 seconds Lost. a g Me n01n (v, a of Seutn.,al 004 a the Nerlhamt 1304.701.01 a a of odd 1504Meat Om., of the 0606 ded Warty: U Rath 2Sewpua 12 miracles 53 seconds 297.05 Met: thence North 22 degrees 0OemMolce 26 w Me 010.3701.62 Iva .off north me l h 69 cedt"=n 51 minutes 520 second ]5suecconds inert a 8 0, 209.37 au to We vest e of sale SeuC"9xelin 0505. of We NP1nwa Odder: , 00 Oedema 50 0001.. 22 *scene Rut .6440 .us the 310.00 001 la We pgni °I esaevp. ZONING, - Parcel A is Zoned R -7 - Parcel B and C ore Zoned R. - No Rezoning Proposed MUSA. - Parcel A fell within the MUSA. - Parcel B and C are outside of MUSA - No MUSA amendment proposed DEVELOPMENT DATA, - Total Plot area = 50 Acres - Upland within plot = 36.16 Acres (76%) - 55 Proposed Single Family Lots - Single Pointy Lots - 3267 Acres (65.34%) - (What A - Green Corridor) = 10.98 Acres (27.96X) - Streets - 6.34 Acres (72.68%) - Average Lot Sae = 0.50 Acres - - Density - 1.72 Lets / Acre - Outlet A to be Publicly Dedicated LOT AREAS/ VICINITY MAP PARTS OP'SM 33. TWA. 31 RN(-. 22 MNMUM BUILDING SETBACKS Wetland = 10 feet (decks allowed in this setback) Front - 30.00 feet Rear - 30.00 reel -1e Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side • 500 feel (garage) Lot Area - 10,800 s4 7L (upland) Lot Depth = 132.00 feet Lot 1116th = 80.00 feet Lot Width = 100.00 feet (comer) LEGEND, Denotes Set 1/2 inch by 16 inch Iron o Pipe Marked by RLS. number 25347 • Denotes found monument Denotes County Cast Iron Monument -,- Denotes Fence Line per Aerial Photo. Denotes Existing Trees per Aerial Photo; see Tree inventory for actual tree locations. I.,- • I booboo Wetland located by Earth Science Inc . Denotes Edge of Wetland by Earth Science Inc . Denotes Existing 2 foot contour ..-. Interval completed by Morichurd ---••- Denotes Setback Line Denotes Water Course Easement Denotes Wetland P0? Area Denotes Pending and Flowage £oeement per document no. 595475 In favor of the City of Lino Lakes. This easement covers some existing high ground and Is - - proposed to be vacated within the FOX DEN ACRES plat boundary. Easements for drainage and utility purposes to be rededicated owr ponding and flowage areas on the fins? plat. - No buildings allowed in wetland setbacks or rooter course (drainage & utility) easements. - WCE - denotes lot area calculation exclusive of low area of lot below Hi.. NOTES - Bearing's shown are on NAD 83 datum. -.Contours are o1 2 foot intervals. - Wetland located by E.A Rod do Sons me (763) -786 -5556 on 11- 24 -03. - Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science Inc (651)- 674 -6210 on 9- 24 -03. - Topography provided by Morkhurd (763) -420 -9606 on 12 -17 -03 - This survey was prepared with 778e Commitment by Chicago Title Insurance Company. Commitment No. 231913. 135JCI- IMARKa Top Nut Hydrant of the Northwest corner Ef Trappers Crossing and Holly Drive. levation = 913.54 NO. DATE n•swwnoN BY ANd/.A CCl1NTT, MSO7A ROT TO 6001.0 GRAPHIC SCALE rs s Meg w not TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTLITY EASENE:NTS& • 11 J L Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining side lot lines, and rear lot lines and 10 feet In width and odjoxling street lines. os shown on the plat Droinave and Utility easements to be dedicated owr, EOF's, ' wetlands d handinglareas, and 10 Met on either side of all storm, sanitary, or watennoln not within public R/Ws. To be determined upon final site design. GUDING, - Parcel A guiding Lou Density Single Family. - Parcel 6 and C guided Rural PERTIFICATION, I hereby certify that this survey, plan mreport 050 prepared n 0. y me or under direct supervision d *not I o - duly Repistered Lana Surveyor under the lows a/ the Stole of Minnesota DANIEL W. a6LRMILLEP. Dote: 9 /7-iy n•I £10.1500 N nl N 0, 5110,1 Ii) to =o arm escrow as I - -. 02 -12.-0 oM9]M, r= auks, I0.^ r - PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOX DEN ACRES LINO LAKES, MN EA4x.Ytu:: PLOWEENOAEERM 3VG: FG OCSAISTA• 24 IF MU' Ania AN 335414 -35,3 rs5 : ms - SCAT amem ta:s.Y F+Tbr^u�.nir ns t.r e .e e Amman — -.-`== hb t"ek,e, ter. ,MXI DP.APHIC SCALE TSIT VICINITY MAP SITE EXISTING 1.11014E5 1) The 101 .1 l.4 Mom on Oa wo.Mgs concerning 11ee ono mac uUiitke b guaranteed to be .Sara. or sit Kevelve The aen wnbt reasonable M o type .n or uuhlee of men ntbang men nto to °°rn°ceto mltim. 2) ice necessary NO-11 be responsible Mt misting stab, bantam. Can Caen Stele One at a.) 45M-0002 tor Manama SANITARY SEVER 1) Sanitary 5.w.r .Malt be R. end 10" PVC SOR 35 WNeaM e w*. natal w4TERM0)2 1) Naloas, Mel be e' ow. Nld,4,) Ie.A Mal be 6 CD *Nam aM 2) Mom hydmnr* 5 a bed a1 curs. 3) awnl a 1504 000,em roes W lap 0) plq. 5ERMCES Ty Mammy ever seats Mall be i' Pat. SOF 2b m0 Wit Le Motioned Darn me dummemn abbe. S) Water mdn Mee be 1. ceppa tn. K. N5 SG n re`w+ u aeuYa m %A Pyu asses `PA` sai u Curbs KM m -ate mata/wl b bnaMntd 1a curb 22111 Cum a a tarmac. KM a feu feel Sea Tail salt.. "Flavat piny sittenaz m0 Canes. Caro to Provide 2) tr eru tWtm Fb hewtentreg meet metaimr as realer CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD MERCY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF 21011100 URLE11F5 AND NOTP1' J:CI1(00 Or ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR 10 THE START C Ca104RUCllat. A 407; CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROAD AMU_ RE II15)0410 AND MAINTAINED AT ENTRANCES TO 035Te10 HARD SURFACE ROADS. ROCK ENTRANCE S.M. BE RO 115S 1.1120 5D FEET ON LENGM AND AS 440E AS NECESSARY FOR TRAFFIC. 05E i TD 7 SASSED ROCK. LEGEND: 1) — — Denotes Existing Sanitary Sewer 2) -1— Denotes Existing Watermoin 3) —>%— Denotes Existing Storm 4) — >— Denotes Proposed Sanitary Sewer 5) —L— Denotes Proposed Wotermain Denotes Proposed Storm 7/ 9 Denotes Sanitary Sewer Manhole 8) Dencles Hydrant 9) Op Denotes Water Shut Off Volve 10) ❑ Denotes Catch Basin 11) 4 Denotes Storm Sewer Apron 12} • Denotes Rip -Rap 13} 0 Denotes Storm Sewer Structure [PRISt.ARED FQT ROYAL OAKS REALTY, INC. 1000 'OL9r'n' FOE ;.ST, cU/TE 150 SM0i LTEE. ", /AM e!..-1::E Fl/OAT: (551.1 IC_ -53112 t rC J'ro /Js SHEET C1 R1 L 1 2 2 0 0 4 y. 3 119��5 crry of Uri<tom' Li. a�.., S REOF: JUL 1 2 2004 CST O LINO LAKES , • • sot's- tr. r-r Na 2.21"W . 07 1=REI_IrolINAR'Nr TREE PRESERvp4TION S89°52' 21"E 450.00 OF: FOX DEN ACRES "` .r°'' FOR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (OWNER & DEVELOPER) 1sO&OrAtITY ROAD E. WEST SNORE' VIEW MN 55126 PHONE: (651)-483-5518 ••••■•,, ,A4 "01 ••. ios • \ 1189'5721"W 546.05 ; 441 6 4- • ,- . s eV'''. ..." 41i* r, tE, i160.00 - r5F21"W I I ty D.)6 . . `,„ VIZ 3 33474 es7 9°57,28"W • • • i/ • N I • • C N ILO c4 •- •-s' 1-" . •75; r'r'l 3-•?•- "PO?: f vg § 1: tr -'' ' / i ---„,.... ,,c--- 1,,k---,' __,._ ...'• .11._ 1.._ ,s. pr -- 'M. 0 ftUD 4 SONle;, INC. ,--- - Lana- tuyvegoo vac LExiNarosi ..,ivaNiuE Ws -------112CL-E P.IINES, 111.1. EGZ:+14-36:* Tat. 169-156-6666 S. 163-18,1,b0a1 -T-14° ;LW JJ 4 4" 2 4.84 , 889'59.23"W 44,44 0., GRAPHIC SCALE a a o no wsi 14139,49.3z-L 213.02, 0444410-,-- I •, VICINITY MAP PARTS OP SR 92. TWO. 31 8145. 22 ANOKA IZOLNTT.INTOTA NOT TO Kn.. tet TREE PRESERVATION MEASURES. Tree Preservation Measures Denotes orange oft fence/tree protection fence placed at edge of moss grading. All trees within this fence are to be removed for moss grading. Signs to be pos indicating tree protection zone. implementation: 1) Install oli silt fence/tree protection fence in locutions shown. 2) Remove trees within the silt fence ores os shown (dear zone) Developer and future &Mears reserve the right to clear any trees not cleared within the Nem zone es It becomes necessary. There shall be no replacement required for these trees. All trees outside the cieor zone shall be preserved and replaced if disturbed per Section 1009. this is to be known as the (save zone). .3) Site to be graded Any oaks damaged during construction to be treated per Section 1009. 4) Custom graded lots to be reviewed by forester of time of survey for building permit. No tree clearing or mass grading to be done with grading permit. 5) Post grading procedures to follow Section 1009. LEGEND, Denotes Set 1/2 inch by 18 inch Iron - ° Pipe Marked by R.L5. number 41578 • Denotes found monument sZt. Denotes County Cost iron Monument Denotes Fence Line per Aerial Photo . ---- Denotes Wetland as Delineated by Earth Science Denotes Tree Clearing Zone Denotes Brush /Tree One per Arial Photography TREE DETAIL 4.4s Denotes Tree Number as togged See Attachment for Description of trees by Kande Company. • AREAS Total Boundary Area a• Z177,946 (50.0 Acres) Total Upland at 1,662,427 (38.16 Acres) Total Wetland w 515,519 (11.8 Acres) 'TREE DETAIL 2. (SPECIMEN TRE(S) Denotes Tree Sita hr Nome N.-- .4005 Tree Type SPECIWN TREE TYPES' e GREEN AS1.1 G.:NORTHERN Nit au: etwint OAK ILI RED MAPLE BENCHMARK, Top Nut Hydrant of the Northwest comer of Trapper s Crossing and Holly Drive. Elevation • 913.54 NOTES: - Searing's shown are on RAD 83 datum. - Trees .tagged by Kande Company (651)-484-0114 on Feb. 9-19 of 2034. - Trees located by ED Rod at Sons — This survey was prepared with Title Commitment by Chicago Title Insurance Company. Commitment bia. 231911 - See Cra<fing Plan and Certificate of Survey far Hydrologic characteristics. erre Dam 0r.7.77717077 or CERTIFICATION. I hereby certify that this evrvab pion 01 rsperl see prepared by me or under my &act supervision and that I san — a duly Registered Land Syreryor under the loss 01 100 Stale al Minnesota DANIEL 01. OBERUILLER Date. 9.%.r 04 License Na. 0.1.1 I... ...Xis.. 000 0.76773V VW* 0-ReJnbr. ern 1 777 7 en INetAros .30.60 A. • 22 W 1/4 COO SEC 17 CM • ti O R cholnOnk Imes 1.1.,/,r, ao"---/ / ' // „p c/ / /' -•.”' '2•y'� �`,/ / ,, 6►.� / // / rr' // // / / / /xr. // t r t / i T'�..' ST' f / // t \ \� \ \\ I f b t•11111 \I 1 waa � `-, f \ 1 \ 1 \ \t 4 1 1 1 � 111 I, i / �l \ I tlill // ��c / / '/4/ ! I MA 1 I I 1 1 1 / / /C1,oj I / j 1111 1r .../;_.Y„," / •," 1 � n E South Line o/ SW 1/4 or yw -1 seo,17 1(1I l \\ \\ l J _1 I\ \‘' f \ �` ' sea2442E �ooso7 i r..,_- l 1 1 I-71, v Al s. i- / 1 / 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \\ I 1 - \ -.. 41 ®1 13.6 Aa. 4 �r ! \ Buld�la Ana 10.8 i1e 1 '1 nza- SE Car. of SW 1/4 / of NW 1/4. See 17. / I t i I� /1' �i so�a./ \v! \\ Buldabin Ark(13.0 Ae r ) /1 1 - \40 R Seibaok� // /� ,21 Una --4--- / \ / 1124 I 51 // UNE( C. 124 \ 124 Coble • 888.49IrE I / r \ \\ C / \, �� \\ a A W � I t (I Imo. I ' N o p�F ts§ j r ?i r g z Irt 0 c3— r.7 lj co FSOUINEAST CORNER OF .. 538.56 117.7 } __ IdpleLA a L4J7 ^Ao.. — / \ — --ki • • --P — •- l ..... v aP I 1 \1 !f / Ill( � (7:4.* I,' / `D� — \ \ \ 457.82 • N8818'02'1'1 / N8848'02” OR111 UNE OF SOUTH 225 FT. OF NW 16 yF SW , / / / / / / / / / / / --/ / / 0/ 8 R tholnllk Benoit / / DY UNE / Setbadu from streets Local sheet 30FL Cdleetr or Arterial stow! 50FL Parking Lot/Ortwoay 15Ft Rear yard PrloPdp Lot 15Ft Side yam P rtndpd Bu(ding 10Ft. P arking Lot BFI Told Upland Aron .• 28.1 A . Zoning Light Induetrid Flood Zone EhalentrUon For FEMA Map No 27000 0005A Doted: 0 -15-70 Zone (except County Dlad, width 1e Zoned "Al DFNO1E5 ANOKA 03UNTY CAST IRON 0 Denotes Fence Line %, w Denotes Wetland located by Forth ° I S&ence Mc. Denotes Edge of Wetland located • by Earth Science Inc. Denotes Existing 2. foot contour Mterv& completed by Morkilurd Denotes Setback Line (-r.-Th-N Denotes tree inoo per aerial photography 0 Denotes Existing Trees per Sir Photo Denotes mass grading limits, tree removal, and slit fence Denotes Proposed Storm Line Denotes Water Course Easement C,® Denotes Emergency Overflow (4000) Denotes Direction of Droinoge Denotes Solt Boring location by Carl Anderson Eng. P.A. (763)42 -9615 token April 29, 04. Boring F & mottle devotion shown. Water elevation. M floods shot Mat, 04. Cr 0b aena001 surface water noted as each DRAINAGE E UTILITY EAS-aM NTS+ OF: FOX DEN ACRES FOR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (OWNER & DEVELOPER) SUITE COUNTY ROAD E. WEST SHOREVIEW MN 55126 PRONE. (651) -483 -5518 PROPOSED NOUSE PAD INFORMATION. �eenoles propoeed finish mode Q mart of garage. Garage hoer it as above this ohm .. `Desalt' house slat. (WD- wolk°o XFLAT L5.ioakoul) (Muffled 0' bsmt depth pr0pewd) Denotes suggested amount le drop gore,' Denotes finish .jg t rear. e horns Finished ed an 2.58 4447, w 0this e eaboeInoarnul . e 770 -11; Mmvn• Lewl ibar to be 2' last above Nqt m 10 feel above Noe. al 044, 1 ponce, and 1• foot a °ewe mmrollina EDF PROPOSED WETLAND PLL: - 44,410 s of wetland 811 - Wetland fin due le rood and driveway construction WETLAND MTIGATION RGOUREM_NTS∎ - 2:1 replacement required (80820o9) Minn. rule 8420.0546 PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION , - 21 replacement required (8 &020,,f) t` 7, • Y - New Welland LYedil proposed (NWC) - 45,318.! Minn. rule 8420.0541, Subp. 11 - public lie Credit proposed (PVC) = 43.503,,1 MMn, nSe 8420.0541, Subp. 6 - total replacement proposed - 88,8210! mitiga0on - DCNOIES WETLAND FILL AREAS - DENOTES WEILANO MITIGATION (NWC) - DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER AREAS (PVC) - SEE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN BY EARTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED. Teti 651 -674 -6210. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE —l0 lT —�i 161 SLIME POND DETAIL GRAPHIC SCALE at '1 rtn)s - win \' 8.07.07 ,21 „W O D i ...-- 4 .„ -• i OC l+y f 'i c \ S89 °52'21 E ,+ ' )450.00 �. bar e 0 It) INS at 0,00 °52'21 -4 • 1y..1Ne,Ra0' B . Mi • J ` LEGEND' Denotes Set 1/2 inch by 18 inch ton ' ° Pipe Marked by R.LS. n bee 41578 Of'- 0 Denotes found monument Ut er no et 332t74' 3= N.9 °57:28 "H 7 rev. \°"1-48' °"1 -`°e ,,.) �.i WATER a 691.6 29T�35'1� et Ruse W r.we or wt am or o I 1, v f : y,eF 1 COMM w I hawse en. • r� r • s- tabs '6 � etwot t SONS, NC. °=180 LEXItiGTO\ AVENUE NE. CIRCLE PINES, `1N. 4- _`, ,r( PC rr a f «I• • -f :FNW y'• • ----, ( 493 •0,.:3 r1 -- t^�'C. tD • • rar' am') . z rS. • i J - :erne, II JL Being 5 .feet in width, unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining side tot lines d rear tot lines and 10 feel in width and adjoining street lines, as shown an the plat. Oroinoge and Utility easements to be dedicated over, EOrs, bands and pondin areas, and 70 feet on either side of ell storm, sanitary, Or wa,01770n not within public R /War To be determined upon final site design. ✓ICCV'TY MAP P F IQ - -- tole. ex 0' at Cr, BENCHMARK' Too Nu! Hj✓nU a: the harthaysl cc Ire EI 1p.�e= g,y',Y4 p and wMT> ET. a t 100eO n1•le. rely. (®Y .2p .. \ ANOkL COUGH'. MMESOi4 0413T TO $Oo Ff 1.2Lictir r Dra-Reur.,, R /` %j` m, II r 410 GNAT, Rea IMO CONCRETE POND OUTLET SKIMMER 1 404001010 CONTROL NOTES SILT FM40E LOT AREAS/ MINIMUM BULD!NG SETBACKS Front - 30.00 feet Reor = 30.00 feet Side - 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lot Area = 10,900 sin. /L (upland) Lot Depth - 135.00 feet Lot W9dth - 87400 feet ' Lo( Meth = 40400 feet (comer) NOTES - Bearing's shown are on NAD 8.3 datum. - Contours are of 2 foot intervals. - Wetland booted by C.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763)- 785 -5556 on it- 24-03. - Wetland delineation completed by Earth Spence Inc. (657) - 674 -6210 on 9- 24 -03. ....qr. - Topography provided by Menthols (763)- 420 -9606 an 12- 17 -03. emUteMui is survey was prepared Mtn Ti0e Commitment by Chicago Title insurance Company. Commitment No. 237973. - Wetland Conservation Easement to &low for moist. of ponds and pipes •wF�'_• 517E PLANNING (1440444430400 PLOWEENG /NEERING /NC. 71491 (1063) 786 -6007 90446 CCUNGIGN ARE M6 03006' PAYS AW 03070 -7625 (755) 785 -1043 (577448 Er eTP 6 rtiML F.EXY.' eerltr, te01 4,.-0 Nan w 0,x0:4 Mc 0, s� Der . - °0 Urrxsa60 . tes,mne' C.9OOYr ems c; Sole 0/ uremrnr0. AstE. 3- y'r•4 r 7902' CeZTFCATIONe T nneby CY�lty Net INC 04077.; Mart or prepared by mom em repeal ilk t mereE4kn .lief 0 brl, 6e f ?5 Lone , M n vndn Me I 1 State Mw, eta J.F L !i le CPEReALER bate 412 G e : L pe a T:.0 '•c41 �,. oar: = me9reur e3eruar ..w r te