Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/12/2005 P&Z Packet• CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 8, 2004 IV. OPEN MIKE • V. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for construction of a church, Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses, 69XX Lake Drive — Paul Bengtson B. Variance to side yard setback for existing garage, Kenneth Muehlstedt, 2221 Reiling Road — Paul Bengtson VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Temporary Signage update — Jeff Smyser VII. ADJOURN • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : December 8, 2004 TIME STARTED : 6:34 P.M. TIME ENDED : 8:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Hyden, Laden, Pogalz, Rafferty, and Tralle. MEMBERS ABSENT : Root. STAFF PRESENT : Jeff Smyser; James Studenski; and Paul Bengtson I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Rafferty called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:34 p.m., December 8, 2004. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: NOVEMBER 10, 2004 Chair Rafferty requested the following correction: Page 12, 8th paragraph, delete the words "prior to" and insert the word "at ". Mr. Hyden made a MOTION approve the November 10, 2004 Minutes as amended and was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 4 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Rafferty declared open mike open at 6 :37 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:38 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 4 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2004 Page 2 A. Final Plat for Miller's Crossroads 2 "d Addition, Bruggeman Properties, SE corner of Birch St. and Hodgson Rd. Staff stated the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Miller's Crossroads in September, 2003. The final plat for the first phase was approved by the City Council in February, 2004. The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. The City Attorney reviewed the title commitment with the first final plat. The City Engineer is preparing a development agreement for the second addition. Conditions of approval have been addressed. The project includes a phasing plan in four phases 2003 through 2006. Since the first phase did not occur in 2003, the first two phases were combined in a the first final plat. A trail easement is necessary to include the trails constructed along Birch St. and Hodgson Rd. The trial easement document must be submitted to the City prior to City Council approval of this final plat for the 2nd Addition. Staff was recommending approval. Applicant, Greg Schlink, stated everything was consistent with the plat and he thanked the Planning and Zoning Board for considering this. Mr. Laden asked if banners, streamers, and directional signs were allowed in residential areas. Mr. Smyser replied banners were an on -going discussion and staff would look into this. Mr. Laden noted he was not trying to limit their ability to market their development. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend approving the final plat for Miller's Crossroads 2 "d Addition and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4 -0. B. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional use Permit and Site Plan Review for Construction of a church, Kingdom Hall of Jehova's Witnesses, 69XX Lake Drive Chair Rafferty reopened the public hearing at 6:45 p.m. Staff stated this item is being continued from the November 10, 2004 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Staff is working with the applicant to address the concerns raised by the Environmental Board, City staff, and those brought up during the public hearing during the last meeting. At this time, staff has not received revised plans from the applicant and is recommending that this application be continued to the January 12, 2004 meeting to allow enough time for the submittal and review of revised plans. Chair Rafferty noted this would be a continuation to at a minimum the January 12, 2004 meeting. Mr. Tralle asked if they have had a neighborhood meeting. Mr. Bengtson replied he did not know if the neighborhood meeting had been held yet. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2004 Page 3 Mr. Pogalz asked if a church as appropriate in this residential area. Mr. Bengtson replied a church was an appropriate use, but it would be up to the Council and this Board to determine if it was appropriate in a residential area. William Loss, 6956 Lake Drive, stated he would rather see some homes built on those lots because of traffic concerns and no connections to water and sewer. He stated he was not in favor of this development. Carol Stanek, 6970 Lake Drive, stated previously the owner had wanted to get those lots split and the City would not allow that so that was the reason this was being sold as one lot. She stated it was her understanding that the City did not want to run utilities to the residential homes. She wondered why it would be okay to put sewer and water in for a small church, where it would not be okay to do this for two residential homes. She expressed concern about the safety in the parking lot and the lights being on all of the time if there was a safety incident. Mr. Smyser replied there were many areas in the City where utility extensions could be put in, but the assessment that would be put on a residential area was very expensive and many residents did not want to pay for the assessment and the City could not make a resident put in utilities. He stated that was the reason that they did not allow a lot split. He noted the Church would be charged an assessment for utilities and they were a larger user so they were more able to afford the assessment cost. He stated a church was allowed in this area with a Conditional Use Permit. Ms. Stanek noted if utilities were unaffordable as one lot, they would be unaffordable as two lots. Mr. Smyser replied there were two lots out there now and one of those lots were being sold to the church. He noted there was no subdivision. Ms. Stanek asked why was the subdivision not allowed. Mr. Smyser replied it was very difficult to bring utilities to the residential area. Mr. Pogalz asked if the plan was for the Church to put in a septic system and well. Mr. Smyser replied that was correct. Dave Knutson, 38 West Golden Lake Road, Circle Pines, stated he represented the congregation that was purchasing the lot. He stated they were still waiting on the County's review and approval, but he would be getting everything into them in the next few days. He stated he had left a message for the Stanek's, but they have not been able to connect yet. He stated they wanted to be as good of a neighbor as they could and the light issue was a concern. He stated the lights would be on a motion sensor and they would not be on all night. Mr. Laden stated one of the concerns was the size of the parking lot. He asked if the parking lot could be reduced. Mr. Knutson replied he understood they had one excess parking space. Mr. Bengtson replied in his report he talked about how the setbacks were not in the ordinance, but the actual parking requirements had to be met whether it was in a DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2004 Page 4 residential or commercial area. He stated the only way they would have a smaller parking lot, was by granting of a variance. Mr. Knutson replied the maximum capacity of the building was 170 and there were 59 parking spots. Chair Rafferty asked for clarification on the lights for the next meeting. Mr. Hyden encouraged Mr. Knutson to have the neighborhood meeting. Rosemary Storberg, 6978 Lake Drive, stated she has lived in the City for 25 years. She stated the lot they were taking about was 200 feet wide by 800 feet long. She indicated only half of the lot was buildable and asked if they had contacted the Watershed District. Chair Rafferty replied if the Watershed District said this could not happen, it would not happen. He stated this was being worked on and this development would need to have Watershed District approval. Ms. Storberg expressed concern about the Church using a septic system with 75 people using it. She stated what eventually would happen is that the lake and neighboring properties would be contaminated and then the residents would be forced to put in utilities. Chair Rafferty stated he firmly believed the City Engineer would not allow something to be put in that would not work. Ms. Storberg stated septic systems tended to jam up and that was the reason that Shirley Kayes and the funeral home had to put in sewer. She stated the church could go 300 feet up the road next to the mortuary, which would be a better location for a Church. Chair Rafferty asked if she owned that lot. Ms. Storberg replied she did not. Chair Rafferty stated the City staff would make sure everything worked on this development before it was approved. Ms. Storberg replied she was not against this Church, but it was being put into the wrong location. Chair Rafferty stated there were regulations that allowed a Church in this location. Ms. Storberg asked if they knew that part of that property on Lake Drive was owned by the State and when Mr. Hanson was going to sell the property, they were going to take an extra 25 feet for widening of Lake Drive. Chair Rafferty stated State, County, and Watershed District would all need to be aware of this development and the staff would make sure this was verified. Ms. Storberg stated if the Church was having meetings, there would be noise from people flying their Seaplanes and repairing them at the Sea Base and she wanted the Church to be aware of this noise issue. DRAFT MINUTES • or • • • • Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2004 Page 5 Mr. Bengtson stated he did not have the plans with him, but he would get Ms. Storberg the information she wants if she would leave a phone number. Ms. Storberg replied they could give her this information at the next meeting. Chair Rafferty stated there were guidelines and things that had to be followed by the City staff and these were the things that staff and the Board had to deal with. Ms. Storberg stated the main concern was contamination from the Church septic system and the residents being forced to hook up to the utilities without being given an option. Mr. Knutson stated this church would not have a daycare or school and the building would probably be used only 5 or 6 hours a week. He stated there would be very light usage of the building. He noted they did not even have garbage removal because someone took the garbage home with them for disposal. Chair Rafferty noted the neighbors were bringing up very valid concerns and those concerns needed to be acknowledged and worked with. Mr. Knutson replied they could not build a church on commercial property and therefore they could not move 300 feet down the road. Ms. Storberg replied the lot could be rezoned. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to Continue the public hearing to the January 12, 2004 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4- 0. C. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Preliminary Plat for a 5 -lot residential development named Vaughan Addition, Michael Vaughan, 600 Birch Street Chair Rafferty reopened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. Staff stated applicant had requested approval of a five lot single - family residential subdivision entitled Vaughan Addition. The subject property is located on the south side of Birch Street approximately 2,180 feet east of Ware Road. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low - density sewered residential use and it is zoned R -1. The site is also within the existing MUSA. This item was continued from the November 10, 2004 Planning and Zoning meeting to allow the applicant time to meet with the neighbors and for them to work with staff to examine the possibility of providing a road stub for the future development of the property to the west. Staff presented its analysis and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Right of access shall be dedicated to Anoka County along Birch Street on the final plat. 2. The project must apply for a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to final approval by the City Council. 3. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2004 Page 6 4. The project must obtain a permit from Anoka county for any work in the Birch Street right -of -way. 5. Prior to approval of the final plat documentation must be submitted depicting conformance to the minimum 50 -foot setback of drainage ponds to existing wells. 6. Park dedication fee shall be paid according to city policy. 7. Existing buildings on the site shall be removed. Mr. Pogalz asked if the 8 lots that were freed up because of the Pheasant Hills Island not taking place. Mr. Smyser replied they still had the right to build Pheasant Hills Island. Mr. Pogalz asked if this went forward would the property to the west be able to put in an access. Mr. Bengtson stated they had to have access to their site and the City would need to provide an access. Mr. Pogalz asked if the City was suggesting two cul -de -sacs. Mr. Bengtson stated he had received comments from Anoka County that they required a right turn access to the cul- de -sac, with this becoming a right -in, right -out only access at some point in the future. Ron Miller, 597 Chippewa Trail, stated they had a meeting on Monday with Mr. Vaughan and they had some major concerns with this proposal. He stated this was a privacy issue with his property because the houses would be too close to his backyard. He expressed concern about overdeveloping this area and with the increase in the traffic. He stated new homes were not selling in the area and to put more in, did not make sense. He presented a Quad Community Press article talking about being stuck in traffic on Birch Street and the homes being too close to Birch. He stated the City should be concerned about their open space. He stated many neighbors felt their voices would not be heard and that was the reason they were not at tonight's meeting. He expressed concern about the City being overdeveloped. Mike Olson, 593 Chippewa Trail, stated he was in attendance at the meeting on Monday night and he was concerned about the lower water table and the drainage. He stated he has had water in his yard before. He expressed concern about contamination of the wells to the south. He asked if there was contamination of the wells because of this development, who would be responsible for it. He stated it would be nice to have four or maybe three houses in this development to preserve some of the woods. He stated he has lived in the City for ten years. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 4 -0. Mike Vaughan, 600 Birch Street, stated he had attempted to address the neighborhood's concerns at the neighborhood meeting. He stated he understood their concerns with drainage and they would be putting in water gardens. Mr. Laden stated if it turned out if this piece of property was only suitable for 4 lots, would it still be developed. Mr. Vaughan replied he would like to keep it at five lots, but it would not be feasible at 4 lots. He stated they could put in up to seven lots, but that would be a tight fit. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2004 Page 7 Chair Rafferty asked for an explanation of a rain garden. Mr. Studenski replied a rain garden was not the sole stormwater entity that would address the concerns. He stated there would still be ponding put in. He stated rain gardens were a way of incorporating restoration, plantings, etc. He noted it was not a typical wet pond. Chair Rafferty asked if Mr. Vaughan was in agreement with staff's conditions. Mr. Studenski stated they would be required to meet Anoka County requirements and the County was requiring a turn lane be put in. John Donovan, 7200 Hemlock Lane, Maple Grove, Loucks Associates, applicant's engineer, stated he had received the conditions and they were in agreement with them, as well as the requirement for a turn lane required by Anoka County. He stated rainwater gardens were encouraged by the Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated they would use more of the native grasses in the water garden. Mr. Tralle encouraged him to not use a lower standard native grasses. Mr. Donovan replied he would take Mr. Tralle's advice and they would also work with the Rice Creek Watershed District on this. He stated this would be a nice, visible area, with a variety of native grasses. Chair Rafferty asked if they were trying to save trees. Mr. Bengtson replied there was a tree preservation plan and applicant was using retaining walls to attempt to preserve substantial trees. Chair Rafferty asked what was the majority of the species of trees being preserved. Mr. Donovan replied the majority of the trees would be oak. Chair Rafferty asked if construction got within a certain range of the trees, they would die. Mr. Donovan replied typically if they graded within the canopy of the trees, there was less chance of survival, but it was possible to grade within the canopy and the tree still survive. He stated all of the lots would be custom built and they would preserve as many trees as possible. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend approving the Preliminary Plat for a 5 -lot residential development named Vaughan Addition, subject to the seven conditions as noted in staff's December 8, 2004 report and adding a condition 8 to read: Installation of a right turn lane. Motion failed for a lack of a second. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend denial based on the belief that the design was not in the best interest of the City at this time. Motion failed for a lack of a second. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend approving the Preliminary Plat for a 5 -lot residential development named Vaughan Addition, subject to the seven conditions as noted in staff's December 8, 2004 report and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 3 -2 (Laden and Pogalz). VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board December 8, 2004 Page 8 None. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. DRAFT MINUTES • • AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: January 12, 2005 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING Conditional Use Permit New Brighton Congregation of the Jehovah's Witness BACKGROUND The New Brighton Congregation of the Jehovah's Witness has requested approval of a conditional use permit to allow a church (Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witness) on a 4.07 acre lot located on the east side of Lake Drive. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low- density, un- sewered residential use and it is zoned R -1 (Single Family Residential). A site plan review will be completed administratively, but considering its relation to the Conditional Use Permit request; those review comments are addressed in this report. This item was first heard by the Planning & Zoning Board on November 10, 2004 and was continued to the December 8, 2004 meeting. The applicant did not get revised plans submitted or hold a neighborhood 41po it was subsequently continued to the January 12, 2005 meeting. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on December 21, 2004. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Vacant Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 North Single Family Residential Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 South Single Family Residential Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 East Lake N/A N/A West Lake Drive Single Family Residential Right of Way Low Density Unsewered Residential N/A R -1 The comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Unsewered Residential land use. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area and within the existing MUSA boundary. Public water and sanitary sewer are not available within approximately 700 feet of the subject site. Kingdom Hall, page 2 lietback Requirements The 50 -foot side yard setback is required per the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit. The proposed building clearly meets all of the minimum setback standards for the R -1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district. The parking lot standards listed above are taken from the commercial design guidelines since the R -1 zoning district does not specifically address parking lot setbacks. A monument sign is also indicated on the revised site plan, to be setback the required 10 feet from any property line. Building Materials The building elevations depict a brick veneer exterior with brick soldier course at a 3' -0" height, with a composite shingle roof. A minimal amount of facade articulation is proposed and the only entrances consist of the main door on the south side and a service entrance on the north side. All of the proposed materials are in accordance with the zoning ordinance. OBuilding Height According to the Zoning Ordinance, no building within a R -1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District may exceed 35 feet in height. At approximately 22 feet in height, the proposed church complies with the Ordinance. Landscaping In accordance with the Screening requirements of the zoning ordinance screening is required along the boundary of the residential property adjacent to this institutional use. Either a green belt with 80% opacity, six feet in height must be provided, or alternatively a solid screening fence six feet in height. The plans as submitted provide a six -foot fence augmented with some additional landscaping. Within the Shorleand ordinance the following is required: Medium density residential, commercial, and industrial structures, parking areas and `other facilities' shall be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, or color, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening shall be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided. The proposed landscaping plan does indicate six Swamp White Oaks to screen the proposed building and parking lot from the lakeshore, but staff is recommending that a row of hedges also be provided on the east side of the parking lot to screen the parking lot and to keep vehicle headlights from shining towards the shore. Staff also recommends that the parking lot lighting standards be painted green to blend with the natural surroundings. Principle Building Parking Lot Required Proposed Required Proposed Arterial Street 40 feet 52.98 feet 15 feet 15 feet Side Yard 50 feet 52 feet and 59.82 feet 10 feet 19.82 feet Rear Yard 30 feet 340 feet 10 feet 142 feet The 50 -foot side yard setback is required per the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit. The proposed building clearly meets all of the minimum setback standards for the R -1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district. The parking lot standards listed above are taken from the commercial design guidelines since the R -1 zoning district does not specifically address parking lot setbacks. A monument sign is also indicated on the revised site plan, to be setback the required 10 feet from any property line. Building Materials The building elevations depict a brick veneer exterior with brick soldier course at a 3' -0" height, with a composite shingle roof. A minimal amount of facade articulation is proposed and the only entrances consist of the main door on the south side and a service entrance on the north side. All of the proposed materials are in accordance with the zoning ordinance. OBuilding Height According to the Zoning Ordinance, no building within a R -1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District may exceed 35 feet in height. At approximately 22 feet in height, the proposed church complies with the Ordinance. Landscaping In accordance with the Screening requirements of the zoning ordinance screening is required along the boundary of the residential property adjacent to this institutional use. Either a green belt with 80% opacity, six feet in height must be provided, or alternatively a solid screening fence six feet in height. The plans as submitted provide a six -foot fence augmented with some additional landscaping. Within the Shorleand ordinance the following is required: Medium density residential, commercial, and industrial structures, parking areas and `other facilities' shall be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, or color, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening shall be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided. The proposed landscaping plan does indicate six Swamp White Oaks to screen the proposed building and parking lot from the lakeshore, but staff is recommending that a row of hedges also be provided on the east side of the parking lot to screen the parking lot and to keep vehicle headlights from shining towards the shore. Staff also recommends that the parking lot lighting standards be painted green to blend with the natural surroundings. Kingdom Hall, page 3 reen Area Plans currently show the property at approximately 18% impervious surface coverage. The R -1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district requires that impervious surface coverage not exceed 65 %. Access /Circulation Access to the site is via an entry /exit driveway directly from Lake Drive (C.S.AH. 23). As indicated in the City Engineer's memorandum, approval for this access must be obtained from Anoka County. The comments from Anoka County are attached, and as part of the Anoka County permit process, the applicant will need to satisfy all of the comments. Parking Churches are required to provide parking at a rate of one off - street parking space for every three seats. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the ordinance requirement is to use the design capacity of the main assembly hall. Gross Area Design Capacity Code Requirement Spaces Required Spaces Provided 4,928 square feet 170 seats One parking space per every three seats 57 59 4. he revised plans clearly depict a sidewalk linking all entry points of the building with the parking lot, especially the area designated for handicapped accessible parking. Lighting The applicant is proposing to have the following lighting: Parking Lot Entry Drive Security Lighting Sign Lighting Two 22 -foot high poles, with two shoebox style fixtures One 22 -foot high pole, with a single shoebox style fixture Motion sensitive lights on the front and rear entrances Two pole mounted floodlights to illuminate the monument sign The pole - mounted fixtures are all shoebox style with downcast lighting, in conformance to City standards. The submitted lighting plan does not include the security or sign lighting. These items must be included on a revised lighting plan and must meet city requirements of a maximum of four - tenths foot candles on adjacent residential property. The revised lighting plan will also need to meet the one -foot candle limit for adjacent public streets as measured from the right-of-way line. Currently as proposed the lighting htin in front of the p' Y p' p g g proposed building would exceed the standard. These revisions must be submitted to staff for review prior to this item being heard at a City Council meeting. The lighting regulations of the zoning ordinance do not completely address an institutional use such as a church within in a residentially zoned property, as such staff is recommending some conditions for this project that are similar to the code requirements for commercial buildings regarding hours of use. Those conditions require parking lot lighting to be turned off one (1) hour after the last service or meeting, except for approved security lighting; and sign lighting shall be turned off after 12:00 AM and sunrise. Kingdom Hall, page 4 •inae The applicant has included graphics for a proposed four foot high by 10 -foot wide monument sign. The proposed sign meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. The applicant is also proposing exterior lighting of the sign with two pole- mounted floodlights. This is discussed in further detail within the lighting section of this report. Trash / Mechanical Equipment The applicant stated at the December 8, 2004 meeting that the church intends to take all trash off site in personal vehicles. This is acceptable, however staff has included a condition that if should this change in the future, any trash storage will be required to be done within the proposed building, accessory shed, or some other city approved storage area. The revised plans clearly depict the location of the air conditioning units, just east of the proposed building on a concrete pad. Utilities Water and Sanitary sewer service are not immediately available. Previously the utility plans depicted a septic system on the rear of the property beyond the parking area, at the request of staff and the Environmental Board, the applicant has submitted revised plans depicting a drainage field on the north side of the property. The location of the septic system exceeds the 50 -foot minimum setback from existing wells. The City Engineer has thoroughly reviewed the submitted plans, and his comments are attached. he Centennial Fire District has informed the applicant that an automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for the proposed building. An automatic fire sprinkler system will require additional water supply over and above a residential well. The applicant has discussed the possibility of getting a variance from the Fire Department over this requirement, however the Centennial Fire District has stated in will not support any such variance application. Staff is recommending a condition that the applicant addresses the fire sprinkler system requirement of the Centennial Fire District prior to this item being heard by the City Council. Stormwater management The City Engineer has reviewed the submitted grading and drainage plan. As a condition of plan approval, the grading and drainage related modifications and comments, as set forth in the City Engineer's memo should to be incorporated into the plans. The location of the drainage ponds exceeds the minimum 50 -foot setback from existing wells. The plan is subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. The city has received a copy of the CAPROC (Conditional pprov 1 Pending Recoup Of Changes), which indicates th L r) o t PROC Approval Receipt Vl Vllallges�, YvIu n the project has only minor conditions in order to receive Rice Creek approval. Kingdom Hall, page 5 ONVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed the project on October 27, 2004. The recommendations include limitations on site lighting and associated noise; potential relocation of the septic system; adequate screening of shoreland and adjacent residences; and instituting a rain garden area for water treatment. A memorandum of the Board's recommendations is attached to this report. These comments are incorporated into this review and will be conditioned or added to the development agreement when appropriate. The board also requested to see the application and staff report again at a future meeting (January 26, 2005) to clarify some of their outstanding issues prior to City Council approval. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chapter 2 of the Zoning Ordinance includes the following standards for review of a Conditional Use Permit: 7. Standards. The Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds the following criteria have been met: r a. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan including: 1) Land Use Plan. 2) Transportation Plan. 3) Utility (Sewer and Water) Plans. 4) Local Water Management Plan. 5) Capital Improvement Plan. 6) Policy Plan. 7) Natural Environment Plan. b. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. d. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City when: 1) If the existing level of service (LOS) outside of the proposed subdivision is A or B, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service more than one grade. • • Kingdom Hall, page 6 2) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is C, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below C. 3) If the existing LOS outside of the proposed subdivision is D, traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will not degrade the level of service below D. 4) The existing LOS must be D or better for all streets and intersections providing access to the subdivision. If the existing level of service is E or F, the subdivision developer must provide, as part of the proposed project, improvements needed to ensure a level of service D or better. 5) Existing roads and intersections providing access to the subdivision must have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. 6) The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall not require City street improvements that are inconsistent with the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan. However, the City may, at its discretion, consider developer - financed improvements to correct any street deficiencies. 7) The LOS requirements in paragraphs a. to d. above do not apply to the I -35W /Lake Drive or I -35E /Main St. interchanges. At City discretion, interchange impacts must be evaluated in conjunction with Anoka County and the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, and a plan must be prepared to determine improvements needed to resolve deficiencies. This plan must determine traffic generated by the subdivision project, how this traffic contributes to the total traffic, and the time frame of the improvements. The plan also must examine financing options, including project contribution and cost sharing among other jurisdictions and other properties, that contribute to traffic at the interchange. 8) The City does not relinquish any rights of local determination. 9) The proposed development shall be served with adequate and safe water supply. 10) The proposed development shall be served with an adequate and safe sanitary sewer system. 11) The proposed development shall not result in the premature expenditures of City funds on capital improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed development. e. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. • f. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Kingdom Hall, page 7 ublic, Educational, and Religious Buildings Standards The R -1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district includes the following as a Conditional Use within the district: Public, Educational, and Religious Buildings. Public or semi - public recreational buildings and neighborhood or community centers; limited to nursery, elementary, junior high and senior high schools; and religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, mosque, and synagogues provided that: a. Sideyards shall not be less than fifty (50) feet. b. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. c. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 5 of this Ordinance and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from surrounding and abutting residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance OPTIONS 1. Approve the project. 411 2. Deny the project. 3. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the project subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The applicant must obtain a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to City Council approval. 2. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 3. The project must obtain a permit from Anoka County for any work in the Lake Drive right -of -way. 4. The applicant must submit revised building elevations depicting additional windows prior to this item being heard at a City Council meeting. 5. The use of outdoor lighting for parking lots shall be turned off one (1) hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. 6. All illuminated on- premise signs shall be turned off between 12:00 AM and sunrise. 7. The lighting plan must be revised to indicate the security and sign lighting, and to meet the foot candle limitations of the zoning ordinance prior to this item being heard by the City Council. 8. Any trash storage will be required to be done within the proposed building, accessory shed, or some other city approved storage area • • Kingdom Hall, page 8 9. Revise the landscape plan to depict a row of evergreen hedges on the east side of the parking lot prior to this item being heard by the City Council. 10. Parking lot lighting standards and fixtures shall be painted forest green to blend with the natural surroundings. 11. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be designed and approved by the Centennial Fire District prior to this item being heard by the City Council. 12. Obtain a permit from Anoka County for work within the Lake Drive right -of -way. 13. The church shall connect to the municipal sanitary sewer system within 24 months of the public service becoming available. 14. The City has the right to periodically review this conditional use permit for compliance with these conditions and for the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Location Map 2. Kingdom Hall plan packet: a. Title Sheet received October 26, 2004 b. Site Plan received December 17, 2004 c. Grading Plan received December 17, 2004 d. Erosion Control Plan December 17, 2004 e. Drainage Plan December 17, 2004 f. Exterior Elevations October 26, 2004 g. Landscape Plan October 26, 2004 h. Tree Preservation Plan October 26, 2004 i. Lighting Plan received. October 26, 2004 j. Light Fixture Cut Sheets received October 26, 2004 k. Conservation Easement Document Received November 17, 2004 1. Easement Document Received December 17, 2004 3. Environmental Board memorandum dated November 2, 2004 4. City Engineer memorandum dated January 6, 2005 5. Public Comment received November 15, 2004 doa) 11269- �iehsrceh'S (D+nosg SEH Data View NAME ADDRESS •ETENDRE LEONARD J & ALMA A PIN 193122410006 te NET/1/ I-3 l• evelo for ent Plans IGIITON KINGD I ALL JEHO ✓ WITNESSES VICINITY MAP NO SCALE RECEIVED OCT2.62004 CITY OF LINO LAKES Drawing Index FEL No. Discription 1 Title Sheet 2 Survey 3 Site Plan 4 Landscape Plan 5 Grading Plan 6 Erosion Control Plan THIS PLAN, SPECI- < a a 3 N U O • 0 • 0 r o o p o a w ▪ ZZ a 0 ▪ O O _ W O I HEREBY CERTIFY UL LAWS OF THE STATE UNDER THE MINNESOTA. 0 z SHEET NO. 1 OF 5 / / / / 0 T 5 / NN SIGN IS 6' THICK W1TH SAME LETTERING ON BOTH SIDES L 0 T 5 — 0- KINGDOM HALL _ of Jehovah's Witnesses zt FOOTING AND FOUNDATION WALL — 60- DEEP SIGN DETAIL NO SCALE Ud E T L A H D GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 20 40 60 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. 1 KINGDOM HALL DEVELOPMENT NOTES: Areas. Total Oita Area 177.110 Sq FL (Approximately 4.07 Ac) Total Bolding Floor Area 4200 Sq Ft (Cary Building) City Parking Required Clty Parking Req. — 1/3 Seats in Auditorium Parking Provided: 170 Seats in Main Auditorium 57 Spaces (10790 degree) 56 Vehicles (13' M.C. stalls) 2 Vehicles (16' Van accessible H.C. stall) 1 Vehicles TOTAL 59 Vehicles N01E: There will be no trosh equipment an vita as all trash will be removed by the Congregation to an approved site and disposed of properly. <9 CITY 3 Notes: DRAWN 10/10/2004 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECI- PROJECT; Notes: REVISED 11/11/2004 PER RICE CREEK WD FICAi1ON. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME COMMENTS PROJECT NAME: NEW BRIGHTON KINGDOM HALL Notes: REVISED 12/12/2004 PER CITY OF LINO LAKES COMMENTS OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENCED PROFESSIONAL PLAN SHEET: SITE PLAN ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINA s O A-1` MINNESOTA REGIONAL BUIT 1DING NO .1 DATE � 74 $ REGEENO. 13786 w I— g J W H Q In m o Z z O Q Q O a a (75 O N S O cr 2 W ~ n a o Q /1 U U W } O CC J W } p o < co W O Z W Q < 2 O C' _ _ O W U W U W 0_ eh NI- et O OO \ CM N v- H N H Z 0 Z 3 VWiLIV) ¢ >M5M W O w O p 0_0CCU iri m 0) O O O Z z PROJECT: PROJECT NAME: NEW BRIGHTON KINGDOM HALL PLAN SHEET: SITE PLAN MINNESOTA REGIONAL BUILDING NO.1 Sheet No 3 OF 6 / / / / It/ 6 RE IA• % / / / / \ / / / ��� / / /�°" 1/ / / �/ \�49„ i M2mrEUwl� axiWTm a Tti�smuCNRE B612 CONC. CURB & GUTTER NO SCALE / /If e// •we, // / // R� \� / / 884 12" 12" 1 1/2 24" SURMOUNTABLE CURB DETAIL NO SCALE 5" CONCRETE B" OF Mn /001 "CLASS 5" AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED SUBGRADE • REFER TO Mn/DOT SPECIFICATIONS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1. All 11950105505, AS SPECIFIED, ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM DEPTHS AFTER COAPACTNN. 2. ALL MATERIALS ARE SPECIFIED USING Ms/DOT DESIGNATIONS 3. THE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT MIXURE SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE %MTH AIR-ENTRAINED CONCRETE FOR PAVEMENT 5EC1105 2101 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STATE ROAD AND BRIDGE CO4SIRUGTON. THE MIXTURE SHAD BE DESIGNED TO OEVfl5PE A MNWUM COMPRESSVE STRENGTH OF 3900 PS AT 28 DAYS WITH A 4 INCH SJA1P AND 4 TO 79 ENTRAINED AIR. 4. 00000010 BASE SHALL CONFORM 70 111/005 SPECIFICATION 2211 (CLASS 5). 5. (LIGHT iTHE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SHALL SHAVE ISOLATION �q(0MPANSION) JOINTS AROUND ALL PENETRATION POINTS DEPTH 009510000 1 AUNTS oAND 715E THE EWES. LAST ,DINT NEAR 0 0000 0 E CONTRACTION VVEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP CRAWNGS SHOWING PROPOSED 4011 LAYOUT. PAVEMENT SECTIONS NO SCALE \ // // //i 1/ / / / {� // / / // / / /, J / / / / // / • / fig/ / / 6 4427 / / CAUTION 1407E: �g ARE I. OF THE vARIWOS UTILITY OMPANES ANDNWEREAPOSWWL. MEASURER.. TAKEN ELEVATIONS MU .TNTE Iu ORMATIiON IS NOT ON TO BE RELIED EN ASB ENACT oR S IS SPETNICALLT COMPLETE THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL TIE ARMORS.. UTILITY WIIPNeES AT LEASE 4B HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO NEWEST EXACT PEED LOCATION OF UNITES LT soul BE THE RESPONsMILTY O THE CONTRACTOR TO REtDCATE ALL THE EXISTING u1UTIES NH. CORRECT MTI THE pRopOSED R ALTS MOM ON THE PLANS. LOCATION OF WAIL UTILITIES SHALL BE OB OR TNNEO BY THE CONTRACT BY EALING MNNESITA GOPHER STATE CNE CALL AT BDU- 252 -1166 ON 651- 464 -01102 GENERAL NOTES: I. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER DIMENSIONS. EXACT WAIILwGTU ILEX ENT TRANCE LOuTIONS W1N FX✓.CT LOCATION OF DowN6PW3 STIBULE SLOPED PANNE, EXIT PORGIES, PRfOSE BUILDING 2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TARE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO AD.M9ENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES O THIS PROECT THE CRITRACTER WLL BE NDD SOLELY RESEONSBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES GOERING TO THE .1. AGENT PROPER., DURING ME CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 3. SAFETY N01RE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE MTH GENERALLY 000FPTE0 CONSTRUCTION PRAC5CES. 1IE CDNTRACTCR MU. BE SOLELY AND CONKER.' RES...LE FOR CONDITONS ON THE AB STE N4uDiNG SAFETY OF ALL PERSO. AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCf OF THE WORK. THIS REOLIREAENT WILL APPLY CONTNUDU9.P AND NOT BE LAM TO NORMAL WARNING HOURS 000 OF THE 1110 R OR 01001 ER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION RENEW OF CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW CF THE ADEWACY OF THE CONTRACTORS SAFETY MEASURES IN. ON OR NEAR ME STE 4. CONSTRUCT!. SHALL COMPLY VAIN ALL AMICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED THE SNAE 5. ACCESS ROA05 SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AND MANTANED WRING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWNNCSSTA UNIFOM FIRE COO. GRADING NOTES: 1. COTE 50.1140ARY. TOPOGRAPHY. UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SHEET 2 OF THIS SET OF PLANS 2, CONSTRUCTION ON SNAIL RESTRICT OULD INCLUDE SIT N. eC E UNITED TO. SOIL AND DRIER MATERIAL DESIGNATED 0STOCKPILING. EOUIP *0TOR M PROHIBITED SIORAOE. O 0 1 of ANY VENOM LEAKAGE OR SPILLAGE CF ANT 'WASHOUT' OR OTHER TOXIC MATERI0_ 3. THE STE HAS NOT NEUMANN, BEEN DESIGNED TO BALANCE RE 0N-SI1E NATURALS. AFTER THE SITE GRADING IS CONPEETFD. IF EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHAH DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SAIL MATERIAL OFF -S. N A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND DE REGUUTING AGENCIES MOOED. THE CONTRACTOR W WL BE 57.0.140 FOR PRONDING NID 81 41 0 1116 TR0(110 CONING 600065 SUCH AS BARPoCADES WADING S1RN8 01005 1AL 4 51!15, FLAGAEN AN9 UGH19 TO CONTROL THE 240400011 CO 1180519 .HERE 206£35891. ADC 00X150. 0ENCES 50011 CONFONM TO APPROPIOATE MINNESOTA DEPARMENT OF TRANSPORTA10N STMUNRDS. 5. D1I BE AS RE TO FRISKED NRFSU DICE O OR.ENED. G AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT 2 FOOT INTERVALS ALL FINISHED GUT DR FILL SLOPES s SP01 ELEVAIWS SHOWN INDICATE RNISNED PAVEMENT ELEVATION UNLESS GTHERMSE N0IEO. 0.6015.6 5TIOWN AT CURB AND COTTER ARE GUTTER GRADES 6. UNLESS OTNEFM4 NOTED. T. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE P691hE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING FOR ALL NATLRAL AND PAVED AREAS B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AND/OR OUT EXISTING 54VE1EN1 AS NECESSARY TO 0SS15E A 9,10014 ITT ANC CONTINUOUFS GRADE. TRAC SHALL B FRONDE APLOADED lANDES A16FETRUCK MTH A GROOSS ROLL DOFF 25 TONS.�MEON TEST ROWXG AND PARETIC BE AG AREA . DIN20458 OF THE ENGINEFRTMRD IVs CITYS MSPECRP. AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN 5EIS AS DIRECTED B1 THE ENGINEER AND THE GINS 1050611 F. TIRE ENENEEN AND 111E ETYS NSPECTOR, AND SHALL DETERMINE 5801AL MAY S E REWIRE STABLE MATERIALS HALL BE REMOVED GR STAMLOEDFIN4PUCEGU AND sm. IHEN COMPACTED PER THE ENGINEERAR6 OR PAR4.11 gCp61NDATONS 10. ALL SSTURRED UNPAVED ARE. ARE TO RM. A MNMW OF 4• of TOPSOIL SEED MULCH CR SOD AND 4 WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND O GRASS IS OBTANED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE / // /tee ,L/ X09 / 7„ / -/7v/ / / / / // / /// /// / / / / /1 / / GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 20 40 60 (w) 1 ia00 - 40 f4 / / / / / / / / / / 7 7 7 7 E PEIV d iL b X'.,.. D t C,' 2 `, 2004 • CITY OF LINO LAKES FILE COPY I_ H O Z 0 a 0n U 00 r IT' W 0 Z 00 0 II I AM A DULY LICENCED ENGINE z 0 II- 0 (n W N Q W 9 J Q O Z Y Z CD W -� F DJ 11 Z U 0 a0 U ~ DM FrY 0 Q a W 00 d d F �Z Q O NO NJ .-- 4 4 Y OZ 0Zp< Z W W W W W aL >ISo 00WO WOWZ 05'U0UO:Q CD ET 0 O O O "8 ZZ Z Z U W D a_ PROJECT NAME: NEW BRIGHTON KINGDOM SHEET: GRADING PLAN z J 0 O z BUILDING REGIONAL Sheet N 5 OF 6 / / / / / / \ L 0 / \ / / / / > / / 1 P/ / b� / / /� - \\ \ \\ // j` / / /� ^ \- / /i ,\ Xo. (MNO� FILTER GLOM GOER RS 14-1/2 14-1/2 GA C MAx M04 0.76 FAIR F NW 1.4 GRADE 3 at APPRovso OUA_ C OSS- 5FC1)0N 6SEDIMENTATION /SILT FENCE WITH WIRE SUPPORT TS / / �'° / // / ,��W � i / // / / b b°j /RCb Ry / / / Y // / / / .7// // • ///% // // / /A- / / / CEDTEMTLE LINDERU CONSTRUCTION EXIT N.TS V -2' DIA WASHED RIVER STONE - 12' MICR •-3:1 SIDESLOPE\ FLOW_ 3:1 00ESLOPE SKI y/ ' // / 777 / / / WE T L P' [1 I- SDITGH NOTE: ALL WOOD TO BE REV SOUTHER YELLOW OR PONDEROSA PINE. CCA PRESSURE TREATED TO A 0.5 LBS. PER CUBIC FT. RETENTION, ATTACH 2'312 -s NTH NOEL CORROSIVE LAG BOLTS. +6i� 4 iEEY�Ei4� �\ :6 I W 6'M6' TIMBER TO DEPTH �T- Mm Fin STABIUTY.N YMi (4' MIN. LENGTH) WIER ELEV. 898.0 DITCH BOTTOM ELEV. 897.42 10' 1' J:1 DITCH SID LOPE VIEW DOWNSTREAM SKIMMER NO SCALE / GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 20 40 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. / / <0 �\ �� // 0s1 \ // / \R2B // / / / / / / / / / / / / / 7/ N / 4/ SOIL EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE NOTE: GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE H THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT CONSTRUTION SECUENCE Ll B MAP SEP OCT NDSCHEDULE D ROUGH GRADING /SEDIMENT CONTROL TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES & STOCKPILE TOPSOIL STRIP STORM FACILITIES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS FOUNDATION / BUILDING CONSTUCTION SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES FINISH GRADING LANDSCAPING /SEED /FINAL STASIUZATION GENERAL EROSION NOTES: L. CONSTRUCTION NONE COMPLY NM ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING WOES AND E CONSTRUCTED TD SANE ON e�qp 2 OFETIE MN1U511TUItt COMPANIES AND. VA.EAPOSSIBIE MEASUREMENTS IN ME FT.. ME INFORNATTIION IS NOT TO DEgRELffD ON . BASED . EMACT DR 5 OF comm. THE CONTRACTOR MST CONTACT ALL THE APPROPRIATE UTLEY CONPA6I6 AT LEAST 43 HOURS BEFORE ANY MAYAS. 19 6506 1 0003 FEt➢mCATON OF UTITES IT SHALL BE TE RESPON913277 OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE AIL THE Da.. UDUT6 NINTH CONVICT NTH THE PROPOSED IMRME.ENTS 940LN ON THE PUNS. THE LOCARON W SMALL UTILET..ALL E OBTAIN. BY ME CoNIR.TOi BY cm. MINNESOTA G OPH. STATE ONE CALL AT 80.25.1186 M 651- 454 -0002 1 THE GENERAL COMR.TOR SHALL TAE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO MC PROPERTY CNIAE TO MJACENT PROPERn6 DURING THE CONSTRUCTION INNS. W MS PROJECT, 111E CONTRACTOR NU. BE HEW SOLELY RE9'ON96LE FIR, ANT DAMAGE OCCURRNO To THE ADJACENT PRWERT6 DURING TIE CONSTRUCTION PHA. OF TINS PROECT. ME STORMW260 POW*.. PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) S COMPRISED O 3119 DRANK (630906 9 SEDMENTATON 4061,101 PL. - ESC PLAN), ME STANDARD 4 DEM.. THE PLAN NARRIT56 ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN ME 91ENORK 9EOFICA0ONS MIT. 02370 (SCOW), PONS THE PERMIT N. ALL 9U93WENT EPR15 AND RELATED DO... S ME CONTRACTOR SHAME RESPONSIBLE FOR CMPLETNG 6 61,4 STORM ME APPLICATION FOR THE MICA GENERAL STOWE/MR PERMIT FOR 5 *00 CTON C11NTY. ALL COMPACTORS AND SUBCMIRACTMS INVOLVED NM STOM WATER POLLUTION 0623)TW SHNL 081*8 A CWT O ME SMRP AND ME STATE W MINNESOTA NATIONAL POIUMEN DISCHARGE ELI... SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (00095 PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMMAR NTH THEN CONTENTS. ME SIMI. AND ALL OMFR RELATED DOCUMENTS MUST BE KEPT AT ME SITE WRING CONSOUCTION. CoNT N• IEN SHALL OF THE BLIPPS AND 9109. PREVENTION FROMBBECNM.ROF REQUIRED TON AND UNTLLEWNSIRUCTON COMPLETED k PPROIED BY ALL INSPECTION AOOIIDNAL BMPS SHALL BE MPLEMENIID AS OCTATD BY COROT . MROWHO. AU. PHASES O coNSTRUCTON. 7. ROgi0IONM .61005 45A0IRECT. BY 7PF6ITINC 01000 M O44CTIR.ETOAREMFMG OR MANUALS OF PRACTICE AS PPLICABLE. coNTRACTM SHALL IMPLEMENT S SHOWN ON THIS PLNM SHALL E CLEAR, El N ATE° CECIL MH FRUGSC .AKES,ASENNSSShL�T FENCE EM.) ON ME DIEKIOPMENTNSITE BEFORE .RN BEGWGS LIMES BY O. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN MF TENPORMY PARKING AND STORAGE ARA MAICN SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE ECUMAENT MANTNANCE AND 0 CLEANING ARA...PLDYEE PARK. AREA AND AREA FOR LOCATING POTABLE FACNTES, MICE TRAILERS AND TOILET FAULT.. 10. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS. VEHICLE 0EAN8O 5061001 CLEMMNO, ETC.) MIST RE UNIT. 10 A DEFNED AREA OF ME SITE AND SHALL BE CONTAINED AND PROPERLY TRATED M DISPOSED. NO ENG. DEGE.NG 15 AU... ON NE. 11. FFIO6 04 AND OSAE ABSORB MATERIALS AND FLOTATION 50015 9u. BE MNNIMED M 916 OR READ, AVMLABLE TO COMM AN0 CLEAN-Up 12 COST M ME 97E SHALL BE CONTROLLED. T4 USE OF MOTOR OILS ms■ OTHER PEM.UM BASED OR TOKW LKMDs FW COST SUPPRESSION OPERATKINS IS PRO10ITED. 13. 9010 WASTE. 10UECIID SEDIMENT. ASPHALT 6 CONCRET NIWNGS ROAi6G DEB60 34160. 3415114 FABREC. CSYSIRID36 6 EMWTON DEARS 6 OTHER WA516 MUST BE 0:50049* O PROPERLY 8 MUST LOAFER MTH MPCA 0:60052* R.URFMENIS. HAZARDOUS MATE0AL5. 9L OASWNE PLAINT 6 ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST E PROPERLY STORED, NOU0NG SECONDARY CONTANM.T, TO PE 93 t4. sm., LENS M OTHER DISCHARG£ ESTRIC.D ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANOALSM. STORAGE 6 DISPOSAL OF HAEARcouS WASTE MUST E IN COMPLIANCE NTH MPCA RECUUTONS 11 ALL STWM 76sTER POLLUTION 485 /6 MASURES PRESENTED ON MI : PLAN. AND N THE 91033, SHALL E TEMPORARILY S:mED. SEEDING SHALL E N AW9RDANE MM MN /DM SPEC 2575 0100 IBS /ACRE (OR MPROIED EWAL) AND IN ACCO DANCE MM ME FOLONNO Gums.; oF STEEPER S6F6,I 3 CASK ED:I TO 61 �4 DAYS FATTER THAN 101 DAYS SEAN TIME AN MA CAN RERAN WEN WREN THE AEA S NOT ACTIVELY BONG WORK. 16. INSEURBED ACCORDANCE VE . 7. NL£ RDESCRIBED UABOVE.A REFER TO ME OR.NO OR LANDSCAPE PUN FM VEGETATIVE COKR TREE AREAS SIINL BE SEEDED of THE SITE IN I] CONTRACTORS OR 916C0..OTCRS RILL BE RESPONSIBLE FORS REMOVING 4*IMERT FROM CMVFIANCES 6 NINA TEMPRMRY 9.MEPtAT. B 966 THAT ME TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER COAL. MANAGEMENT BASINS THEM MUST E sTABLOLD To PE.ET IT FROM BENG M.H. BACK NM ME BASN, CONVEYANCES, OR MNxAEWAY4 DISCHARGING OFF -SITE CR TO SURFACE WATERS ME CEANM OF PEN... BASINS MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN ME BASIN 10 Da. GP... 16. CN -SUE 6 003-910 90 4 SS1006+1E AND COMM ARAS SHALL E PROTECTED F104 m09W *60 s.IMENTA4M THROUGH MPLEMENTAnON W NIP'S 5180036E AND BoRRow AR. S SALL BE NOTED CN ME ME MP AND PERMITTED N ACCOM.CE NM GENERAL PE.7 REWNEMENTS. 19. T /POMMY 584 STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SAT FENCE OR OTHER 631001.E SEDIMENT CM1R044 6 ANNOY BE PU[m W sLNFACE NAM. INCLUDING 51O ANA1fR cONVETANCES SUCH M CURB 6 GUTTER SYSTEMS OR CO BITS 6 DITCHES. LIFES SHALL E LEFT IN A RO...ED CONDITION DURING ME GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNoFf VELOOT6 AND .0.N.. 21. DUE MADE CHANCES SDURN0Mro84161014091 OF HE PROJECT, THE 6NIRCTGR SHALL E RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUST. ME BOSON CONTROL MEANIF55 (SILT FENCES, STRAW O• F OCONTRUCCTB NRIAU.0 EASTA F�IED ATT Tow OF110N .RKNG MY, THIS Noun. BAIXFlWNG OF TRENCHES FM UTILrtY COETRUCUM AND PLACEMENT OR MAINTENANCE: ALL MEASURE STATED ON 1105'172 AND SIDIM.T CWMOL PLAN, E STORM WATT tualcN PREVENTION PLw 91µy E MAINTMN. II FU PERSON O CCxO11TH pLA NO sT ROUTINELY EWNm FOR A E CONSTED TON O WOE E FINAL STAELI3AYS . ME SITE. ON OEUCTON ANC 2 Y ACT PEN_ NOT. ON MS POW MUST THAN a5 01*5 04 20 0490 ALL DN 8TE NICE EVERY BON C OARS WRING RETIVE COHSE CLEANED ANC MTT4N 24 4 ACCOR A RAWALL THENT LLOWN0 MAN 0.5 NOAES N Z4 HOURS tH01R AND SEDIMIXFA11ON CONTROL MEASURES 9RALL BE CIFNm AND EPNR. IN ACCORDANCE NTH ME iOLOWN6: 1 . ALL STD. ORAN INLETS MADE CPR.. DURING CMSIRUCIIM MUST BE PNOTMEO BY APPROPRIATE PROPRIATE 9 UNTIL ALL SORES WITH P07.11. FOR 17..ARGNG TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STMIUED 2. ALL SEED. AR410 SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SE MAT A 000p STN. IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHINW E FERTILIZED. WATERED. AND RES... NEED.. s. SILT FENCES SHAT E FEPAR4. REPLACED OR 6UPPLD4Am TO MDR O DNAL 4000:4ONS P DAMAGED, SEMEN, 9V,LL BE EM01N FROM THE SILT FENCE 44.1 R R.EE6 ONE -THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE 9LT PONCE. THEE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE WM. 24 HOME O DISCOVERY, CR M so. AS FIELD =NOTIONS ALLOW ACCESS. L VENI. 19*05ET SWEEPING MUST BE USED F SUCH EAP'S ME NOT A66WAETE TO PRSEM 3014897 TIME 34*5 CONCRETE . ONMS�SREET 02040CKEEDD 1DIMENT 1 MUST E REMO. FNON ALL OFF -SITE PAVED SURFACES NMW 24 HOURS W DISCOVERY OR SOONER 5. THE 1E00RMY PARKING AND 51MME AREA 9141E KEPT W 6000 COMMON (SOTABLE FOR PARKING MID STORAGE). TH5 4AY REDLINE PEPro8C TOP O RESSNG OF THE TFMPoR.7 PARNNC 575 mNDITONS MOND. S 91TE7 5TRUCT46 N DE 1EMPOURY AND PERMANENT 5.ILIFNTA103 BASINS 91ALL E MNNTAN0 W 06801I04AL =NOTIONS AT ALL TRIES SEDIMENT sHALL BE CMSET4OWTIW FRU SEDIMENT B.NS OR TRAPS N494 THE 72 *COTES Cr 9SGOVERY OR AS SENIN AS FIELD cJFEI..5 ALLOW ACCESS ONE-HALF THE STORAGE VOLLME MANAGE k RFNOVAL MUST B E SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION / pHASE 1: ALL STADIUM CONSTRUCT. ENTRANCES 2. PREPARE TFMPOWRY PARKING MD STORAGE AEA. 3. CONSTRUCT ME SILT FENCES ON ME STE CLA▪ PCT ME SEDNENTATON AND SEDIMENT TRAP BASKS AND GRUB 114 SIT. G. START CONSTRUCTION OF ME BOWING PM AND STRUCNR6. 7. EON GRAD. THE SITE /PRASE 2 I. TEMPORARILY SEEP NDEROR AREAS. / 2 NSTALL MOUES, AROUND OUND STORM SEWERS, cute AND WTSA §. 3. NSTALL RR-MP AROUND OUTLET 0 STRUCTURES. STORM / 4. INSTALL PARRENDIE fOR PA„W�MWHD ALL STORM 3WER SIRUCNRES. 5. PAVE SITE 7. INSTALL .ET PROTECTION DENIES. 9. COMPLETE OAl Ex CRAJMNC AND GROEROONPERMANENT SE EN CON R DOAESAMTN4 9 (ONLY IF 9. IS STABILIZED). DEVELOPER /OWNER FEWBRWNIGN CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S MINEIS5 ADORE. SITE OPERATOR /GENERAL CDORACTOt SIFdMTENDeln ACREAGE SUMMARY N ORES PAVEMENT AREA 0.83 AC OWING AREA 0.127 AC. SEEDED AREA LEOS AG. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 1.76 AC. RAIN GARDEN NOTE: TREE@ .ALL Bf ND LINING OF sANDY SOW IN ME RAN WATER GARO.. o DARE c *oAfy 99EE AA lW 0 /SA, D MOMS IE 2 Er BEEP THE 900 01 , WA E DEP -R001. NATIVE 11504* . IN LL 7AIGAVCC NTH MDSE SARY TO PROLE -IFI RI "ROMS'AX MM ME TIE SEEX WATERSHED DISTRICT. THE O CONTRACT. FINAL M 4 04* TAIRY, *1UZ01 S ECES ROT 1*419) NTURS' L... 9LT �WRIXG CONSTRUCTION (LE SILT FENCE AND FXCAVATON 70 FINAL GRADE LATEX sTABLIUTNMR O UP M AREASIEICJ) 4., _ COST ''\ 1,-4 THE PUNTS USED 38 THE RAN GARDENS SHALL BE. FOLLOWS 3. BU! - L Y . m® ((R APA E A) 3. FlK ACEN. I N NAT ) 4. FIRE MIN M(67.(67.311. N.EEOWUM FIE NNW) 6 !ova (ELI A,OTRS rATA, . BF BALM BERGNOT (MONARDA FlSTUU) vin &II.r7LLEA 1(uEF000r' -NWAE) 10. urn. BWESTBN (SOAIV.CHYRIUM .DPARMM) 11 BLUE VETERAN (VERBENA HASTATA) 12 CORM SUNROW. (HEMP. HELIANMOD6) DEC "-1 4- W Q } OD Z < < 0 a - 4 0! a w 3 70 F I- O W ° O IY o ° ° a � 0 CZ 0 O J z Z O to In W o 0 0_ a O w 0 z 0 )- 70 0 a OF LINO LAKES /12/2004 PER CITY 6 f% N i O O z z UI 0 Z LLJ O 0 PROJECT NAME: NEW BRIGHTON KINGDOM HALL SHEET: EROSION CONTROL PLAN z LL_ BUILD -NG z z Sheet No 6 OF 6 / / / L 0 T 5 / \ SS 8 oo Irj„ \ F N r \\1 L 0 T / / 1/ / �i / / / / 1< // 2 / \\J / / // / / /% /// / / / / /� /% FLT / / // // / // // / / o /A� (1// / , / /O�. /yh / / / y / / // / / / / / / / / / / /' // // / / / /// / // / - g9$/ / / /// / / 6/ / / / // A /// / // / 74'1. Z / // / // / /0. / / / // / // /// / / GRAPHIC SCALE 40 20 40 BO (18 FEET ) 1 in0h = 40 ft / // �\ \ 1\ jI N 1 // `0 l ^1 .1.1 E T L A N / / / / / / / / / 7 7 SOIL EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE NOTE:GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE NNTH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE })EC ROUGH GRADING /SEDIMENT CONTROL TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES STRIP W STOCKPILE TOPSOIL STORM FACILITIES JAN FES MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS FOUNDATION / BUILDING CONSNCTON SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES FINISH GRADING LANDSCAPING /SEED /FINAL STABIUZATION GENERAL EROSION NOTES: 1. CONSIRUOa. SHALL COMPLY WTI ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING OWES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO STUN: • E CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFIC., CAUTIONED THAT TIE LOCATIONS AND/OR OEVATONS O ESSEN° UTILITIES AS SHORN ON THEY PLANS ARE BASED ON OF THE VARIQUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND. WHERE POSSIBLE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN N THE FIELD. THE IJRSMATON IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BENG EXACT RECORDS COMPLETE THE CONWAL'TOR MST CONTACT A11 ME APPROPRIATE UTLDN CO PANIES AT LEAST GE HOLES BEFORE ART EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT RELOLOR TON OF URIT6 SHILL BE TIE RESPTM SBILTY CP THE CONTRACTOR TO REOLATE ALL THE Eg5a1G MUTES MNICH CONFLICT REIN TIE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. CATION OF SAN/ UTUTES SHALL SE OBTNNED BYRE CONTRACTOR BY CAMAS MNNESOTA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT SOD- 252 -1186 ON SRI- 454 -0DM 3. THE @&RAC CONTRACTOR SHALL TAME ALL PRELATE.. NECESSARY TO MOO PROPERTY DAMAGE TO AAMCENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES W THIS PROEM TIC CONTRACTOR MIL BE Hfm SOLELY NESPON9B. FOR ANY DAMAGES OCCURRING TO RE ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PIASFE Of THIS PROTECT. THE STORMWAIER PCULTON PREVONTON PLAN (SWPP) IS COMPRISED O INS ORATING (EROS. & YOWIXTATIO4 CONTROL PLAN - ESC PLAN), TIE STANDARD A DETAILS THE PLAN NARRITVE ATTACHMENTS NRDAm IN THE 91EW)RK SPE0FICAT.S SECTION 02370 (SW PP) PLUS THE PERMIT AND All 9 LISEWENI REPORTS AND RELATED DOCINENTS 5. THE DONTR.TOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING & SUBMITTING 1XE APPUCATON FOR THE MPCA GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT MN CONSTRUCT. ACTMY. ALL CAI0110 FIS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENT. SHAD OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SEPIA AND THE STATE CP MINNESOTA NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE EWNADON SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPOES PERMIT) AND BECOME FALaAR WITH TIER CONTENTS. THE SWFP O ALL OTER ROMEO DOCUMENTS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCT.. & CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BHP'S) As REQUIRED BY THE %PPP & PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVERSEE TIE NSPECTRN & MAINTENANCE OF RE BHP, AND EROSION PREVENTION SRN ACCATIONN SNNP'S SHALL BE IMPLEMEW2D AS CICTATED BY CONOITCNSIxTMq THROUGHOUT ASED OF LIN CONSTRUCTION IS CONPREIFD k APPROVED BY ALL AUTHORITIES 7. BMWS AND N. CONTROLS AS LL CONFORM ID FEDERAL. IN AGENCY OR LOCAL L. S9RRESENTS OR MANUALS OF PRACTICE, AS APUCABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL NPLEMENT B CONTRACTOR THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY 88801ED (ER WITH FLAGS STARES, SIGNS. FENCEEETC. GENERAL 1H D[VIIOPMD4T SITE BEFORE RCRK BUNS LINTS THE NAMUR B. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PAIRING AND STORAGE AREA WK. SHALL ALSO BE USED AS TE EQUIPMENT MANT.AN. AND AND CLEANING AREA MELO. PARKING AREA AND AREA FCC LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES OTGE TRAILER, ANT TOILET (ACCT. t O ALL WASH WATER (SNORE. TRUCKS. VEHICLE 8000180, DE 000180, ECLFPMENT CLEANING. ETC.) MUST BE UNITED 10 A DEED AREA OF THE SITE AND .HAUL BE CONTAINED AND PROERLY TREATED ON DISPOSED. NO BORE DEGREASING IS ALLOYED ON SITE 11. RIEFICENr OIL AND GREASE AIEORDNG MATE AILS AND FLOTATION BOATS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON STE M RE., AVAILABLE TD CONTAIN AND CLEAN -UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEANS 1T LAST ON THE SITE SHALL SE CONTROLLED. THE USE OF MOTOR OLS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TONG LAUDS F. CURT SUPPRESSOR OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 13. SOLED WASTE: COLLECTED SEGMENT. ASPHALT & CONCRETE MILLINGS. FLOATING DEBRIS. PAPER. PLASTIC. FABREC C.STRIDTNN At DE6101118 DEBRIS It OTHER • HIS MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY At MUST COMPLY MTH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. HAZARDOUS MAMA.: OIL. 0.0UNE. PAINT k ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUSTS E, PROPERLY STOR INCLUDING SECONDARY 0]NTNNMENT, TO PREVENT 1l SPILLS, LEN. ON OT DISCHARGE RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAE AREAS MUST BE FRONDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE & DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BEN COMPLIANCE LATH MPCA REGULATORS. 15. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN. AND NINE SWPPP. SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED. SEEDING SHALL BEN ACCORDANCE LATH MN/DM SPEC 2375 0100 LEES /ACRE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) AND IN ACCORDANCE LATH THE FOLLOWING CUMIN.: TIFF 00 ICE STEEPER THAN &1 7 OATS 10:1 30 3:1 14 A ) DAYS TT 1Hµ Tat HAAR TIME AN AREA CW RERAN OPEN WHEN THE AREA. S NOT ACTIVELY BEND WORKED 1s. DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED. THEY ARCS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE DIME TABLE DESCRIBED ABOVE REFER TO THE GRATING OR LAWY PE PLAN FOR VEGETATIVE COVER 17. CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS ILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RENON. SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES & FROM TEMPROARY SFDN.TA010 BASINS THAT ARE TO BE OORRDDRNNMEWATS CHARGINGG OFF-R MANAGEMENT T URFACE WAITERS. THE CIENNM STADIUM PPERMANPREVENT NS MUST 9F SUFFICIENT T TBOO RETURN THE BASIN, TOSONN CAP., B ON-STE & OFF-STE SOL 5120015.E AND 0ORRCW AREAS SHY- BE PROTECTED FROV ERO90N AND SEDIMENTATION THROUGH HMPLEMENTAT. 6 BAPS STOCKPILE 1 AND BORROW AREA LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND PEWIT. N .2 DANCE WITH GENERA PEWIT REQUIREMENTS 19 TEMPORARY COIL STOCKPILES LAST HAVE SILT FENCE . OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS & CANNOT BE ACED Hx SURFACE WATERS, NO UOWG STOWAWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB & GLITTER SYSTEMS OR CONDLATS & DITCHES. 20. SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A RONNE. CCN.TON DURING THE G.ING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF \EMOTES AND EROS.. II. DUET 0 GRADE CHANCES BALES, RING THE PREVENT SI 05 1� PROJECT. ME CONTRCTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSRNO THE EROSION CONTROL MEA5RE5 SHALL BF STNS.. AT THE END OF EACH WORKNG OAT, 1145 INCLUDES BACNRWNG OF 1R.0E5 FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT 22. ALL Of GRAVEL OR BINSNOUS PAN. FW ROAD CONSTRUCT.. MAINTENANCE: ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS EROS. AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, D N THE STORM WATER POWITION PREVENTION LW 910y BE TNNEG N R FUNCTIONAL CONOTiONN .ENO LONGER REWIRED FOR A COPIETED PHASE NORM OR NINA STABILIZATION SITE THE OESIGNAWFD TEMPORARY C.7.7 NINA 24 HOURS PERSON AFTER AA R NFALL EVENT OREA. MAN 0.5 NOES NN 24EHOURS ALL EROSION AA9 SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. MEASURES SHAL L BEE CLEANED 4AAND SPARED IN CONSTRUCTION ON S. ONCE EERY SEVEN DAYS ACCORDANCE LATH THE FOLLONNG: 1. A�1ST STORM N MADE ...LE CURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE PROTECTED SY APPROPRIATE DAM'S .R AL SCONCES WITH PoIENTIA F. DUS.ARGRIC 2 ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGUIARLY 10 SEE THAT A 2000 STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTL180, WATERED. AHD RESEEDED A5 NEEDED. 3. SILT FENCES SHALL SE REPAIRED. REPLACED ON SUPPLEMENTED TO MEN ORIGINAL CONDITIONS F DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE LT FENCES NEN IT REACHES ONE -TORT THE WELT OF THE SILT PICT ESE REPAIRS MUST SE MADE WMN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OR AS SOON AS FT. CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. 1. VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEGMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCT. STE MUST BE 11100280 BY BEES SUCH AS STONE PADS. CONCRETE OR STEEL WASH RACKS, CR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS STREET .BEEPING MUST BE USED F 9ICH SPY ARE NOT AOFQUA. 10 PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET. TRACKED SEDIMENT MUST SE REMOVED FROM AU. OFF -SIR PAVED SURFACES NTHN 24 HOURS OF DHSOMRY OR SCONE 5. THE TEMPORARY PARKING NO STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD COMMON (SWAB. FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). 545 MAY REWIRE PERIWIG TOP DRESSING O RE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. S. OUTLET STRUCTURES IN THE TEMPORARY MO PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL SE MANTNNED IN OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS AT ALL TIES SEDIMENT • BE REMOVED FROM SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS THEN THE 0E9. CAPACITY READIES ONE -HALF THE SNRAGE VOLUME ORNNAGE k REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETED IAN 72 HOURS S DISCOVERY OR AS SOON . FIELD COMMONS ALLOW AWES SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION / PHASE 1: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCT. ENTRANCE 1 SPARE TEMPORARY PARKING NO STORAGE AEA CONSTRUCT THE LT FENCES ON THE SITE 4. CONSTRUCT THE SEDWENTAT. AND SEDIMENT TRAP BASKS. 6CLEAR D GRUB THE STE. . START CONSTRUCTOR O THE BUILDING PAD AND STRICTURES 7. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. / PHASE TE 2: . TEMPORARILY UTY SEED DENUDED AREAS / 2 INSTALL UEURES ROUND UNDERGROUND. STORM SEWERS, CURB ANp GLITTERS 3. NSTALL RIP -MP PROTECT. U5'SUCTMR / ♦ TORN SEY£R SIHUCNRE6. ;;;:;45:; / ENT MN., SOD IMO PLANTIEDUIENT CONTROL ENCES DEVELOPER /OWNER NEVI BRIGHTON CONGREGATION OF 004MAM's WITNESSES ADDRESS SITE OPERATOR /GENERA CONTRACTOR SJPERINTENDENT ACREAGE SUMMARY M ACAS PAVEMENT AREA 0.83 AC BALDING AEA 0.127 AC SEEDED AREA 1.023 AC. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 1.25 AC RAIN GARDEN NOTE: THERE SHALL SE NO INNING OF SANDY SOILS IN THE END WATER GARD.. THE TOP DRESSING SHALL BE A TOPS.. /SAND MIXTURE AT LEAST p DEED TIE REVEGETATION SHALL BE 006 -RWTED NATIVE VEGETATION IN ACCORDANCE LATH THOSE RECOMMENDED BY TE OTT r LNO LASS AND W CWPUARCE THE RICE .REEK WATERSHED MTN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE WEA9HIIES Ci RENNET. TELL LialN1N WXINc MTH CONSTRUCTION (I.E. LT FENCE AND EXCAVATION TO FINAL GRADE AFTER STAR TM ., UPSIREML� (p i ct . THE PUNTS USED FON THE RAN GARDENS SHALL BE AS FOLIO.: V"T "1 1 I Li tA>s.. 1.,i - -- BUT1ERLr MwRWEm 2 L> -ETm (A =IZCI wnx1r) *' ) MARSH TIED CLIPIA IN A> PIKE KING YARRO (ARCHILUEA VISIMOJW 'FILE KNOT VZNC STAR TORRN MACULATION) 1 JOE PTE (,BERGAMOT (SONAR. R T 7. EE SAM. BERGAMOT (MONA(0A Fl MIRO 1 8 1 00RDYM- 0**21 A) 10. UTTL B*E1) FN (R11Z1CMYRHM ..; =.PARER) 11. 2. S EU HASTATA T£ SUNFlO ERR(HOP94 NEL)NIRK..) �n I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECI- 00 OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND A DULY LICENCED PROFESSIONAL 00 a ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE 8- /12/2004 PER CITY OF LINO LAKES 0T 00 oO ZZ J J O 0 Z 0 < z J d z 0 I- Olb LLI` zQ PROJECT NAME: 1 .� 41 /1 a W W (r) z /'/'\ L.J_ z p <4 O <4 0 z Sheet No, 6 OF 6 • t FOR DRIVE THRU DETAILS SEE A3.3 12 CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENTS COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF O O TOP OF SLAB 1.2 EL 0.0' FOR DRIVE THRU DETAILS SEE A3.3 MOOS uir.UinrUn.u.n..i .iL_ nunnnnununnnonnnnn.nnnunr..... nnmmUnfm"m nnmmlummmmnnmmmummmn illllllllllalllltlllilll TRIM (DENTIL FASCIA OR OTHER) }}7T..7 rt�l�i,7�. ■ -717T 1 I - ii.uuii iiii /lt■■IWANMI 1nI1.11. 1111. YI111IIIUm111111111111nnnnnmnnm. InmIm111. mmlnmmmmnnnmmmm111111111111Illlllll ,llllllllllim mnmm =0 mummnlllllultlll upmflmnnnnunnnnnnnnnnnnnnlnunnmmmmummnmmnnnmmnnmmnnnnluuununmmuunun DECORATIVE UGHTING DECORATIVE ENTRY DOOR A A3.1 TRIM 0 ENTRANCE FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8 " =1' -0" DRS THRU COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF BRICK VENEER 12 ■ 1 .. ■ ■ ■ l • • ■ , •.- 1-..1117 1... - 170.1170 ■ 7 • 1_ 7101j7j7 _ _ 1 a•1.7•••T.11711•••• uutnuunnnnnnnnnnnnnuuununmm1nnnnuuunnunnnnunnnnnunununnnnnunnu1ntnnnnnnnummIIumnnnnnnunnnunnnmHunnnmm1unuuuunnnuunuutunnnnnnnunnnnnnnuuununnnnunuuntnunnnnuun B I RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION A3 . 11 SCALE: 1/8=1'-0" BRICK SOLDIER COURSE z 0 a O Q 0 z EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET TITLE 3 DWN BY: CKD BY: SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" DATE: CAD #: 05 —A3 1 H 1 SHEET No. A3.1 OCT 4 %2004 lc Ty OF F i LA e= • SECURITY LIGHT 0 TOP OF SLAB k EL 0.0' ■•■••••••■ CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENTS COMPOSmON SHINGLE ROOF TRIM (DENTIL FASCIA OR OTHER) WM ■ >• 1 ~1�117ir■llllrin771i71yr>t7 LTiNilli7YtrW-niN71LH 11 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ^ • - • • • • I71M1! Iiui•1 uIl l4 ■ • 1 - a • 1 nnnuxntnminnmmnminnnunpnmuum; xnnunnnnunnnuumnnmmtullnnmluuuunulmmmnlxtmmmlannnmmlumlmumnnmaxmnnmullunrmmannYnmm�mm�mm�nnnmmmmxnnunnnmm�nnnmmxnm mnnnuxnnnnnnunnunnnnxul A3.2 BRICK VENEER BRICK SOLDIER COURSE REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF 12 FOR DRIVE THRU DETAILS SEE A3.3 h7111 11 H/ 1Wt111�1111 >tAl1)1/117/11111111h/111 II111I1 1n11i1111,dr111111M1'1 11 17•1717 N11n47d111111 )7/141171��7171T111117W71711>fl In1111111fl11t11111xnI11111xMIII1111111I111111I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111t11 t11111nn11t1111111atmilltllll utllll milllllllnimulllllllltllixllllllllxllnlllnitll ninu1n111tI1111111n111tI1111111111111 ulnu111n11n11111I1m111t11111111111111a111lllllllllmtlllltll nmxmmnnnnnlmnnunnnunnnnunlnnlmBlnlnmmnummnummmummmmluuxm1I11111111111I1111Ilulllltllllmtt lnnnnnnnnunummnnunmm�nm111nnnxunnnnuuunnuumnnmm�nnnnwnnnnunnnnunlnnnnnxmunxn B LEFT SIDE ELEVATION A3.2 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" DRIVE THRU z 0 rc SHEET TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT TITLE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OWN BY: CKD BY: SCALE: 1 /8"=11-0" DATE: CAD #. 05—A32H1 SHEET No. A3.2 OCT `f 1,2004 CrrY ` -i9 Nc S 1 E • / /45 / / 6' x 30' PRIVACY FENCE 4•/ ) s E ESPY n L / J / / / I /� / / / \ / e, / /— ^� \ / /� / / / /�. qo \ \ / / X450 / l / /% � \048 68 / / / CD 1 \ '^ / // / /� f / ✓� / / / C / W�� / /// / / / =� `1 / / / /� / / / / / / \� T LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY COMMON NAME /SCIENTIFIC NAME ROOT QUANTITY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OVERSTORY TREES AB AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE /ACER X FREEMANII 2.5' B88 4 SO SWAMP WHITE OAK /OUERCUS BICOLOR 2.5' BM 6 EVERGREEN TREES BS BLACK HILLS SPRUCE/PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA 6' B&B 18 SP SCOTCH PINE/PINUS SYLVESTRIS 6' B&B 4 ORNAMENTAL TREES PF PRAIRIFIRE CRAB/MALUS PRAIRIFIRE' 1.5* B88 8 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CD CARDINAL DOGWOOD /CORNUS SERICEA 'CARDINAL' /5 CONT. 6 0 15 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET u ** .0 PIONEER engineering .> *4c ** ash eels -0. ram l -•ass' nw loco ru. rw 6' x 30' PRIVACY FENCE 'J N // / / / 4 // `\ \ \\ _ / AA / / / / / / / 7 / / / / // / / // / / / / / /o�1/ // / / / / / / i / / / / / / `/ / / j / / / / / / / / / / �4, // //� /,r / / i n L_ T 1 r...—.._ \I / / i' — 7 ,../ ' / / / / / / / / / oti / /. / // / 1 / / / . ,/ , / / / / // // i // \'�. \--, . / i / / / / / / / .// / / / / / / / / / —� //6456/ / /// / / /// / �/ // // /// //696 '/ 7 // // /// // // /// /469 45ti // r/ /// // // 6 i /// /// /6450/ /// / / / / / /// // 666/ /// // // /// /// // // /t6 // / / / / /66R / / / / hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct Name supervision one that I am a duly registered Londscope Architect under the laws of the Slate 01 Minnesota Reg. No. Date Revisions Dote 16/6/04 Designed pam Drown porn W E T L A N D SHEET TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN 88th �J a ROCK MULCH Y DEPTH LAID OVER 6MM POLY SHEETING LANDSCAPE NOTES • The Land[cope eenaoctd mm .ail q[ Woleo rite t [become loon i .iln the edstinq condition[ did to submitting a DiE.d • The Lmdscope Co0tr0eter anal welly au orifice m the dojeel Site aria to cdnmensnq .ar1� roogn one Iran 9700* to be deformed by others. • No construction Thos been d a� emete4 qt grading ia and immediate or ant motorist 0109 di .t the Months. found n the Mndreon Association of Nurwpnen -Ammon 5tonderd For Nursery Stow • Alt conlon04 feria to be gran ' the container of six (6) months error 10 0..5 m mte. • Deciduous of tree[ need not be staked. but the Lana[cope Comnlr 010, must guorontee stmaao:my to o wind speed of 60 Y.P.H. •The Landscape Conlraeld shot qudmte. new plant metena through one (11 corm year k4n Ire tine of written acceptance o work nom Ire own •11 !1404. ' 0 0esc`epancy between the number 01 Teant. shown a mim m0 a number mown e amt list. Ire nu D04 mown on tn0 d d1 take Drocatlenea • Commercia 0'000 pay ten eegirp mat be .staled round tll planting beds sodded a • Three inches a1 wood mulch man be meio es snow an trees ond shrubs that ore 50!60 from the larneetim amts. Mulch in a mb beds .ii be c 6waua Mach under Conifer trees wet 00400 6- aeyand 11e trees canopy. Md. under eleci0uous frees .i1 extend 2.5 feel from the trees' trunk . llhi.e 1Ie1c.D 0Ce tlnet Warm!* cp stet ul no oosat to the owns. CONTAINER SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL Prune 1 and es — Pr negw derma \ 55.2 reef 0414 e00tnq 9700. as d remove e =r:w° Wi •v ar.r.a r Or i�r1 r4a °LL s -3 Ikno r *wows G I=I I Headed Ion .b.0 A•III Owl *la rr a s•rMIr owNERNEW BRIGHTON CONGRETATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL a ricOra.. elo Mal Iris Mode R1 cad arM _ pr 97 Cidnq '.sons n:v D< rasa Becks: IN oak After tree *move wre is placed or at one burlap J 0-9114111111% -3 Mrs 41 e.me ne terbee lino. ow r � [Wina1 CONIFER TREE PLANTING DETAIL PRDJECTNEW BRIGHTON CONGRETATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES SHEET L1 OF 1 SHEETS 1 • / / / / �A) 11 A —L. SOP° , ., / / TREE PROTECTION TRICE L TREE PROTECTION FENCE HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE USED FOR TREE PROTECTION FENCE / // Dn0 suppers MNDOT 3886 2. • Y wood or steel lance past. 4' ma• 1000^9 ere meth reinforcement Sid. lims fence. nos 30- Ngh, max. mesh spacing 6- and 4 %Z gouge wee. 6�e0m�1 106,0 00X F,n rabic er epee! 90 _Amoco lope. end 1.500 Repo: /2122: age or opera.. e0ve� Overlap Mane 6- .Id r . V intermix ly loan[ in the trench fabric anchorage trench Boc ra trench Mtn looped nature! coil Emend *Pe rnesn into trench PROTECTION MICE poN enceureg• -0 n. specn:dp me cp Data. Allech DURO Ne Ace e earn posts m w, yes or ere Pm PROTECTED ROOT ZONE 0 15 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET / // /,, / // /..S // PMiECi/ // W E T L A N D • TREE PRESERVATION NOTES 1 - BEFORE LAND CLEARING BEGINS. CONTRACTOR SHOULD MEET WITH THE CONSULTANT ON SITE TO REVIEW ALL WORK PROCEDURES. ACCESS ROUTES, STORAGE AREAS. AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES. 2 - TREE PROTECTION FENCE IS 70 BE PLACED OUTSIDE OF 1HE DRIPLINE OF ALL SIGNFICANT TREES TO BE SAVED. FENCE TO REMAIN UNTIL AU. SITE WORK 15 COMPLETED. FENCE SHOULD NOT BE MOVED OR RELOCATED WITHOUT VERBAL OR WRITTEN COMMUNICATION WITH THE CONSULTANT. 3 - NO FILL SHOULD BE PLACED AGAINST THE TRUNK. ON THE ROOT CROWN. OR WITHIN THE 04110 LINE AREA OF ANY TREES THAT ARE TO BE SAVED. 4 - CARE MUST BE TAKEN TO PREVENT CHANGE w THE SOIL CHEMISTRY DUE TO CONCRETE WASHOUT AND LEAKAGE OR SPILLAGE OF TOXIC MATERIALS SUCH AS PAINTS OR FUELS. 5 - ALL CONSTRUCTION EOUIPMENT. VEHICLE TRAFFIC AND STORAGE AREAS 9051 BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF ANY TREE PROTECTION AREA. 6 - PRUNING OF OAK TREES MUST NOT TAKE PLACE FROM APRIL 15 TO JULY 1. 7 - IF WOUNDING OF OAK TREES OCCUR, A NON -TOXIC WOUND DRESSING MUST BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY. (EXCAVATORS MUST HAVE A NON -TOXIC TREE WOUND DRESSING NTH THEM ON DEVELOPMENT SITES. * *tf `* PIONEER * engineering H = =e *rte *4 * ..ens - ,.59x., .e. N.pnee- w.:ew +Yh for) vx-:eao Elea- HAZARD TREE STATEMENT //� b / / 67, // // /// ^/ c / / % / / / / / // /// // / / / / / / /// / / / / / / / /// / / // / // / / / / / / / / / • HAZARD TREE EVALUATION BASED ON : • HAZARD TREES AN EASY TO USE FIELD GUIDE" BY ED HAYES, MINNESOTA DNR, 1996 • HAZARD TREE — ANY DEFECTIVE TREE WITH A TARGET. • TARGET — ANY AREA WHERE PEOPLE MOVE THROUGH, LINGER, OR STAY. INCLUDES FACILITIES AND PERSONAL PROPERTY. • TREES LISTED AS HAZARD WILL NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL TREE TOTALS. I hereby certify that this plan dos prepored by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 oat o duly registered Landscape Architect under the Tows of the Stale of Minnesota Name Reg. No. 1 Revisions Dote 10/22/04 Designed PAM Drown PAM / SHEET TITLE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN tip 14[ AREA OP ROOTS EIMA. TO 1' -1 .0' irk Min 4. 04 TMee 8.4ETER (0134) PROTECTED ROOT ZONE NOTES: • 90 -950 OF A TREES ROOT SYSTEM 6 LOCATED MI0NIN THE TOP 3 OF SOIL • SOX 00 A TREES ROOT SYSTEM 6 LOCATED 911NN TIE TOP 1' OF THE SOIL • 0405T FOIE ROOTS ARE WHIN THE TOP 10' OF THE SOIL SURFACE, IT 6 THESE ROOTS THAT FUNCTION PRIMARILY N RATER AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE *SOME TREES CAN WITHSTAND LP TO 508 ROOT SEVERANCE BUT OTHER TREE SPECIES ARE EXTREIOLY SENSSTVE TO .0' ROOT SEVERANCE • SOIL COMPACTION AND FILL OVER ROOT DOYENS ARE JUST AS OYAGNG AS ROOT SEVERANCE AND SHOULD BE MINIMIZED 100 PROPER SOIL OXYGEN LEVELS. •TREE PROTECTOR FENCE OR SILT FENCE 6 TO BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE PROMOTED ROOT ZONE 01 THE TREE. oWNERNEW BRIGHTON CONGRETATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES Twit Siee(n) •Tree Type Notes :Status 5738 10,8,8.6 Siberian Elm :Sale 5738 6 Siberian Elm _...... :Sale 5740 ..__.._.... B Siberian Elm ...... .....,Sa59 :5741 6. Siberian Elm ,,.�Sa�e -: 5742 ..............__.12 10.._.ib nE......._._:....._..........._............._ _..........................__._ ._.......... 57Q ..................... 12,10. Siberian Elm - :Sale .._ ... ..... ...._.. ._I ......... 5743 : 7 7 Siberian Elm Sete ,.5744. 733bean El 5715'. 6 S10enen Elm Sate ,.. 5746 166 Siberian Elm 'Remo. 5747 8 8 Retl Oak RRmwe ..5748 6 Siberian Elm decay at root flair Sate 5749 6 Siberian Elm Sete 5750 18 Red Oak See 5751 7 Red Oak 'Sate 5752 7 Chesty Inc bark at 1st branch union-5ft Remoe 5753 6 Siberian Elm :eic bark at base Remus 5756 7 Siberian Elm Remote • 5757 .__ 6 Siberian Elm _.., :Remote 4 5758 6 Shenan Elm Remora 5759 31 Siberian Elm Inc bark 0-108 decay at beee _ Hazard 5760 7 Siberian Elm Inc bark at 48 RemLAn ._ -5761 13 Siberian Elm Inc bark at dS :Remora -. ;5782..._......... 14 Cottonwood ....._ .. ....... ......... ..._.........;Remus., -: 5783'. 6Siberian Elm :Rhinos • .._.......... 90 ..... ... ......._.... .._.._.._. o.._._. 5764 : 6'Siberian Elm :Remus ........... ..................._..._....... _............ _......:................_ _._......__.__............_..._ _..._...__......801011.......:, ....5765' ...._.... 6 Siberian Elm Remove '` 7.. .88L ........................... BShenan Elm Rernoe 4 ... n Elm._..... L ............................._...._...... ...._........_................. 4 ...._...1...: 5767 : ........ 6 516enan Elm _..... Remoe_,_ 5768: 6 Siberian Elm Remoe 5789 7 Siberian Elm nc lark at 58 _,. Remus 5770. .._.......13 Jack Pe bW hrancllesl poQStmcture Remus ....: 5771 1D. Siberian Elm :Remus '. .... ........... .......n 80 ... ___..... .......... .........._: 5772 .__......... 12,6 Siberian Elm Inc c bark at base ... SBNI1 ..__........, 5773 BSlhenen Elm ..._... - Sete 5774 8 Boxelder Ironing -�� Sete eltle '. -5775 7:BOxr Saw ._.__. _.. .......... .._ ............... ........._... __...; 5776 .19,10,8 •Sherien Elm :mc hark 0.48 Remove_: 5777. .._..... 7 3iDenen Elm Ramos _... _..._........._.. ....... 5778 ........... 7 Siberian berian Elm ..inc ba0rk 0.20 ... :Rem.,.. 5779 �.... _.... 7 Boxelder :Remote 5780 : 6 Siberian Elm inc bark at base Remome 578t i 9 Siberian . an Elm me hark at 91[ Rem ........... _... .._.__... ................_ _......__ ...........: 5782 2 11 Siberian Elm Sate 5783 ... 14,6 Boxelder c bark at base ..... Saw • 5786 .... 6 Siberian Elm .... ...._,Remrne 5785 6,6 Sbenan Elm Inc bark 0-28 Ramos • 5786 7,7 6,6 Slbenan Elm Inc bark 0-40 Remus 5787 29 Siberian Elm -- 7036stl Inc bark 061t H9zar6__._ 5708. .... 14 Sher Maple _........ ,Ramos 5789 tfi S her Map! Remove-._ 5790'. ......... 12 S her Maple ..... Ramos.: ; 5791 18 Sher Maple inp bark 368 ..._ Ramos..: 5792 10,8,8 S I , Maple Inc bark 0-38 Re o. 5793 18 S he an Elm Remo. _... .._ 0 5781 25 SLbenen Elm 50%0d-decay hFUaN ....... Y ... 5795 ..,, 23 Siberian Elm me bark 388 Remove . �5786 7,6,6,6 Siberian Elm me bark 0.28 Reines . 5797 ... 13 Sher Map° ... Remove .. 5798 ... 9,9 Red Oak inc hark 0-28. Remove 5799 12 Colorado Spruce Sins 5800 10,1D6,7 Silver Mape Inc bark 0-35 Saw 5801 25.14,14 Siberian Elm ino balk 0-49 Remove sere 8 Siberian Elm Remove 5803 10 Colorado Spruce Remove ' 5804 10 Colorado Spruce _.. Remo. 5805 113 Siberian Elm Remo. • 5806 13 Siberian Elm ... .... Remo. 5807 1 1,10 10 9,8 Siberian Elm Inc lark 0.28 mind._ Remome 5806 9 Siberian Elm Remove 5808 6.6 Siberian Elm Remo. '. 5810 7 Siberian Elm See • 5811 10 Red Pine _.._ __....... Saw 5812 9 Red Pine...........:.. .._ _ ..._....._..... _. Saw 5813 4 3 R Pine - _......_ ... _....._ ..............._ .Saw 58141. _...... 10 Red 661, 6815': 7 Red Pine .......... Sew 5816 7 Red Piro Saw 5817 9 Red Piro Sew 5818 � 8 Red Sew 5819 7Red :Tenon. _.,Saw 5820 10 Red Save 5821 9 Red Pine Saw 5822 10,97 7 Siberon Elm Sew j0 . 11,10,7 Red Pine Inc Cenc 0-25 sew 5824 10 Red Pine ._ .... Saw 5625 4 Red Pine Sew 87b 11 Red Pine 58275 7 Red Pine 5828 � 5 Red Piro 58:84883032262524' 29 _ ..... 8 Rod Pine 5830 5604 Pine 5831 12 -1-bin stems White Cede 5832 17 Siberian Elm 5833 12 Stlerian Elm 58 % ......... 6 Red Pine.. :........._. .._.._. 5835 10Red Pine 5 ...............__.__............_.._.............._..........._....._.. ................._............. .._ 503FT .. .........................13Red Pine_........._.._. .................._......._.... 583F 9.. Red Pine 5838' 06.41169 1338 B Red Pine 5840 - 10 Red Piro 5841 4 Rid Piro ' 5842 3 Red Piro 5843: 131 -: Siberian Elm _ . 5844 Red Pine 5845. ....._.. 6I Red Pine .... 5846- 11 Red Pine R _... _.._ _..... `'� ._....._ 10 Rea Pine 5818 6 Sbenan Elm SBO 11 Siberian Elm 5850 1010 Sbenan Elm .ARC bark 04. • *TREES LISTED AS HAZARD WILL NOT BE INCLUDED IN SIGNIFICANT TREE TOTALS PROJECTNEW BRIGHTON CONGRETATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES Saw 5459 Sate Sew Remove .Saw -. .._ Saw ....... .... 5459 ....._! ...... Sese......... Saw ...... ;See .._...., Sine : Sew :Saw .... SSaw ......; saw .... Saw - -. Saw Saw 1 Sete Sew Saw :Saw SHEET TRH 'F 1 SHEETS • # of Trees % of Total# Caliper '; % of in. Caliper in. Save 60 54.55 517 51.75 Remove 50 45.45 482 48.25 Total 110 100 999 100 Hazard 3 na 85 na oWNERNEW BRIGHTON CONGRETATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES Twit Siee(n) •Tree Type Notes :Status 5738 10,8,8.6 Siberian Elm :Sale 5738 6 Siberian Elm _...... :Sale 5740 ..__.._.... B Siberian Elm ...... .....,Sa59 :5741 6. Siberian Elm ,,.�Sa�e -: 5742 ..............__.12 10.._.ib nE......._._:....._..........._............._ _..........................__._ ._.......... 57Q ..................... 12,10. Siberian Elm - :Sale .._ ... ..... ...._.. ._I ......... 5743 : 7 7 Siberian Elm Sete ,.5744. 733bean El 5715'. 6 S10enen Elm Sate ,.. 5746 166 Siberian Elm 'Remo. 5747 8 8 Retl Oak RRmwe ..5748 6 Siberian Elm decay at root flair Sate 5749 6 Siberian Elm Sete 5750 18 Red Oak See 5751 7 Red Oak 'Sate 5752 7 Chesty Inc bark at 1st branch union-5ft Remoe 5753 6 Siberian Elm :eic bark at base Remus 5756 7 Siberian Elm Remote • 5757 .__ 6 Siberian Elm _.., :Remote 4 5758 6 Shenan Elm Remora 5759 31 Siberian Elm Inc bark 0-108 decay at beee _ Hazard 5760 7 Siberian Elm Inc bark at 48 RemLAn ._ -5761 13 Siberian Elm Inc bark at dS :Remora -. ;5782..._......... 14 Cottonwood ....._ .. ....... ......... ..._.........;Remus., -: 5783'. 6Siberian Elm :Rhinos • .._.......... 90 ..... ... ......._.... .._.._.._. o.._._. 5764 : 6'Siberian Elm :Remus ........... ..................._..._....... _............ _......:................_ _._......__.__............_..._ _..._...__......801011.......:, ....5765' ...._.... 6 Siberian Elm Remove '` 7.. .88L ........................... BShenan Elm Rernoe 4 ... n Elm._..... L ............................._...._...... ...._........_................. 4 ...._...1...: 5767 : ........ 6 516enan Elm _..... Remoe_,_ 5768: 6 Siberian Elm Remoe 5789 7 Siberian Elm nc lark at 58 _,. Remus 5770. .._.......13 Jack Pe bW hrancllesl poQStmcture Remus ....: 5771 1D. Siberian Elm :Remus '. .... ........... .......n 80 ... ___..... .......... .........._: 5772 .__......... 12,6 Siberian Elm Inc c bark at base ... SBNI1 ..__........, 5773 BSlhenen Elm ..._... - Sete 5774 8 Boxelder Ironing -�� Sete eltle '. -5775 7:BOxr Saw ._.__. _.. .......... .._ ............... ........._... __...; 5776 .19,10,8 •Sherien Elm :mc hark 0.48 Remove_: 5777. .._..... 7 3iDenen Elm Ramos _... _..._........._.. ....... 5778 ........... 7 Siberian berian Elm ..inc ba0rk 0.20 ... :Rem.,.. 5779 �.... _.... 7 Boxelder :Remote 5780 : 6 Siberian Elm inc bark at base Remome 578t i 9 Siberian . an Elm me hark at 91[ Rem ........... _... .._.__... ................_ _......__ ...........: 5782 2 11 Siberian Elm Sate 5783 ... 14,6 Boxelder c bark at base ..... Saw • 5786 .... 6 Siberian Elm .... ...._,Remrne 5785 6,6 Sbenan Elm Inc bark 0-28 Ramos • 5786 7,7 6,6 Slbenan Elm Inc bark 0-40 Remus 5787 29 Siberian Elm -- 7036stl Inc bark 061t H9zar6__._ 5708. .... 14 Sher Maple _........ ,Ramos 5789 tfi S her Map! Remove-._ 5790'. ......... 12 S her Maple ..... Ramos.: ; 5791 18 Sher Maple inp bark 368 ..._ Ramos..: 5792 10,8,8 S I , Maple Inc bark 0-38 Re o. 5793 18 S he an Elm Remo. _... .._ 0 5781 25 SLbenen Elm 50%0d-decay hFUaN ....... Y ... 5795 ..,, 23 Siberian Elm me bark 388 Remove . �5786 7,6,6,6 Siberian Elm me bark 0.28 Reines . 5797 ... 13 Sher Map° ... Remove .. 5798 ... 9,9 Red Oak inc hark 0-28. Remove 5799 12 Colorado Spruce Sins 5800 10,1D6,7 Silver Mape Inc bark 0-35 Saw 5801 25.14,14 Siberian Elm ino balk 0-49 Remove sere 8 Siberian Elm Remove 5803 10 Colorado Spruce Remove ' 5804 10 Colorado Spruce _.. Remo. 5805 113 Siberian Elm Remo. • 5806 13 Siberian Elm ... .... Remo. 5807 1 1,10 10 9,8 Siberian Elm Inc lark 0.28 mind._ Remome 5806 9 Siberian Elm Remove 5808 6.6 Siberian Elm Remo. '. 5810 7 Siberian Elm See • 5811 10 Red Pine _.._ __....... Saw 5812 9 Red Pine...........:.. .._ _ ..._....._..... _. Saw 5813 4 3 R Pine - _......_ ... _....._ ..............._ .Saw 58141. _...... 10 Red 661, 6815': 7 Red Pine .......... Sew 5816 7 Red Piro Saw 5817 9 Red Piro Sew 5818 � 8 Red Sew 5819 7Red :Tenon. _.,Saw 5820 10 Red Save 5821 9 Red Pine Saw 5822 10,97 7 Siberon Elm Sew j0 . 11,10,7 Red Pine Inc Cenc 0-25 sew 5824 10 Red Pine ._ .... Saw 5625 4 Red Pine Sew 87b 11 Red Pine 58275 7 Red Pine 5828 � 5 Red Piro 58:84883032262524' 29 _ ..... 8 Rod Pine 5830 5604 Pine 5831 12 -1-bin stems White Cede 5832 17 Siberian Elm 5833 12 Stlerian Elm 58 % ......... 6 Red Pine.. :........._. .._.._. 5835 10Red Pine 5 ...............__.__............_.._.............._..........._....._.. ................._............. .._ 503FT .. .........................13Red Pine_........._.._. .................._......._.... 583F 9.. Red Pine 5838' 06.41169 1338 B Red Pine 5840 - 10 Red Piro 5841 4 Rid Piro ' 5842 3 Red Piro 5843: 131 -: Siberian Elm _ . 5844 Red Pine 5845. ....._.. 6I Red Pine .... 5846- 11 Red Pine R _... _.._ _..... `'� ._....._ 10 Rea Pine 5818 6 Sbenan Elm SBO 11 Siberian Elm 5850 1010 Sbenan Elm .ARC bark 04. • *TREES LISTED AS HAZARD WILL NOT BE INCLUDED IN SIGNIFICANT TREE TOTALS PROJECTNEW BRIGHTON CONGRETATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES Saw 5459 Sate Sew Remove .Saw -. .._ Saw ....... .... 5459 ....._! ...... Sese......... Saw ...... ;See .._...., Sine : Sew :Saw .... SSaw ......; saw .... Saw - -. Saw Saw 1 Sete Sew Saw :Saw SHEET TRH 'F 1 SHEETS • hojem Ix 44 4.44 I`awu 1I..x..WONi,Wn RUUD LIGHTING 1101..7000 U5. °.°Y,.m,IaON °P.a,n, 905611.1991050 ..P1/11xwx e i a .m 0.7Tw01a 100MAAOLIS CA1.11.1.03 AT WPM USING NE AN LUMENS Inb Ix Ir 1x. Iwnr, Ixw* 1n« 1n,� RUUD LIGHTING 150 150 aj 0.0 00 0.0 0A 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.1 C2 O g p4, 0.0¢ 00 '&4 8, 0 AN R F It h 0.1� cc 551 °33'43 "E 460.00 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA oes 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.0 0 OA 0,0 0.0 0.0 00482.00 551 °33'43 "E 00 0 00 0.0 00 O0 011 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 OA 00 00 0.0 0A 0A OA 0.0 00 0.0 0A 0.0 0.0 0A 0A 0A 00 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 ADD2ONAL EQUIPMENT 121 P545220252 22 a 4 a. 125 SQUARE STEEL POLE (I ) P54522C15Z 2204 r_ 125 SQUARE STEEL POLE POLE AND FIXTURE MEETS 100 MPH SUSTAINED WINDS PI.YE .I1EA ONtY IWmin.nuwwaln) klavirnum .61 Minimum x..✓M,n xaacall00 C f, TV : Lit LAKES' I; its p L_ EPA RATING 6" EXTENDED POLE MOUNT 16 (406 mm ARR G/ GA W Y LIGHT v'L l Isofootcandle plots show initial footcandles at grade:°(Pootdandhrs � 0:0929- =-- L-ux).- -- EPA 0.95 for single fixture with 0° tilt (Consult factory for EPA rating on multiple units). . =50 °'t 4. rata. ON to kV-4Y' ii��''1 ..,,4 0000,,r t• ♦ 41110 � .30 120000. 30° � 20° Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 10473 Candlepower distribution curve of 400W MH Parking /Roadway Light Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 4941 Candlepower distribution curve of 400W HPS Parking /Roadway Light Pole- spacing Example Data Catalog # Lamp Type PR2417 -M 175W MH PR2425 -M 250W MH 40 -M 400W MH 1111k5-M 250W HPS PR2540 -M 400W HPS 100' 80' 100 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 30.5 24.4 Om 6.1 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 30.5 122 183 24.4 30.5 lsofootcandle plot of 250W MH Parking/Roadway Light at 25' (7.6 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 305 24.4 183 122 6.1 0 m 6.1 Lamp Lumens 12,000 • 30.5 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 30.5 122 18.3 24.4 30.5 Isofootcandle plot of 250W HPS Parking/Roadway Light at 25' (7.6 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) Mounting Height 15' (4.6 m) 20' (6.1 m) 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100 30.5 BD' 24.4 60 18.3 40 . _ .5 -- - 12.2 6 20' 6.1 - �ti- 0' 20' 40' 60' -- 80' 100' 305 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 0 m 6.1 122 183 24.4 30.5 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 30 5 lsofootcandle plot of 400W MH Parking /Roadway Light at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) 100' 80' 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 305 24.4 183 122 6.1 Om 6.1 122 183 24.4 305 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' B0' 100' 30.5 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 183 24 4 30 5 Isofootcandle plot of 400W HPS Parking /Roadway Light at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) Test area is centered within a (16) pole layout. Max. Recommended Pole- spacing XxY 90' (27.4 m) x 60' (18.3 m) 120' (36.6 m) x 80' (24.4 m) Average Initial Light Levels at Grade 2 Fixtures per pole @ 180° (Footcandles + 0.0929 = Lux) 20,000 20' (6.1 m) 25' (7.6 m) 120' (36.6 m) x 80' (24.4 m) 150' (45.7 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 32,000 25' (7.6 m) 30' (9.1 m) 28,500 20' (6.1 m) 25' (7.6 m) 150' (45.7 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 180' (54.9 m) x 120' (36.6 m) 120' (35.6 m) x 80' (24.4 m) 180' (54.9 m) x 120' (36.6 m) 50,000 25' (7.6 m) 30' (9.1 m) 150' (45.7 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 180' (54.9 m) x 120' (36.6 m) Footcandles Lux 3.97 43 2.15 23 3.60 39 2.22 24 3.56 38 2.41 26 4.94 53 3.08 33 5.41 58 3.67 40 RUUD LIGHTING 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 www.ruudlighting.com FAX (262) 884 -3309 12/11/03 6" EXTENDED POLE MOUNT 6" (406 mm) PARKIN Ballast Capacitor Ignitor (Where 1-6• (152 mm) ❑16° (406 mm) required) Housing Seamless, die -cast aluminum Finish color: bronze Cord 24" (610 mm) long Reflector Hydrotormed aluminum with brightened and anodized finish Extended Pole Mount Finish color: bronze PULSE START METAL HALIDE El SPEC# 200W PSMH PR2620- (a)(b) ED SPEC # 250W PSMH PR2625- (a)(b) 0 SPEC# 320W PSMH PR2632- (a)(b) 0 SPEC# 350W PSMH PR2635- (a)(b) 0 SPEC# 400W PSMH PR2640- (a)(b) METAL HALIDE El SPEC# 175W MH PR2417- (a)(b) ® SPEC# 250W MH PR2425- (a)(b) El SPEC# 400W MH PR2440- (a)(b) Ej HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SPEC# 250W HPS PR2525- (a)(b) Q SPEC# 400W HPS PR2540- (a)(b) Specify (a) Voltage & (h) Options. GENERAL DESIGRIIPTIION Parking lot and roadway luminaire for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Supplied with IES Type III (250W MH is field adjustable to Type II) optical system. Housing is seamless, die -cast alumi- num. Mounting consists of a 1.8" (44 mm) wide by 4.5" (114 mm) high by 6" -(152 mm) long extruded aluminum arm. The arm is held in place with two 3/8" (9 mm) mounting rods fastened to a steel backing plate inside the pole, and by two nuts inside the fixture housing. Mounting rods are provided with sealing washers to prevent water leakage. Lens assembly consists of rigid aluminum frame and high- impact, clear- tempered glass. Ballast Compartment Cover Patented Hinge Assembly 6.5" (165 mm) Lamp (Included) Lampholder Lens Frame Die -cast aluminum door frame secures lens; sealed with silicone gasket Finish color: black 120/208/240/277V (Standard) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (Standard) 1 120V 2 277V 27 277V Reactor (PSMH Only) 3 208V 4 240V 5 480V 6 347V (Canada Only) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin TD-9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authorized Intemational Distributor. Fixture includes clear, mogul -base lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv -rated screw - shell -type lampholder with spring - loaded center contact. Lamp ignitor included where required. All ballast assemblies are high -power factor and use the following circuit type: Reactor (277V PSMH) 200 - 400W PSMH CWA - Constant Wattage Autotransformer 200 - 400W PSMH; 175 - 400W MH; 250 - 400W HPS 31ABELS ANSI Tamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in US and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP65 per IEC 529 and IEC 598. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 www.ruudlighting.com Notes 0 -(a)F -(a)P -5P 0 Fusing Button Photocell External Photocell (for 480V) Quartz Standby (includes 100W quartz tamp) (N /A on 277V Reactor) Specify (a) Single Voltage - See Voltage Suffix Key f n iiN P 26' Exclusive DeltaGuarda finish features an E -coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven - year limited warranty. M NTS US 4,689,729 SDR1ES FWG -16 Wire Guard SBL -16 Backlight Shield FAX (262) 884-3309 12/11/03 RUUD LIGHTING * PIONEER * engineering LAND SURVEYORS • CIVIL ENGINEERS 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651) 681 -1914 FAX:681 -9488 Southwesterly line of Lot 6, - AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 1511 LAND PLANNERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 201 85th Avenue N.W, Coon Rapids, MN 55433 (763) 783 -1880 FAX:783 -1883 DESCRIPTION SKETCH FOR NEW BRIGHTON CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES / Most northerly corner of Lot 6, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION Na 151 N 0 Xr`3R,3, Northeasterly line of Lot 6, NN' AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 151 z �' \9r 'SA ,� i \ POINT OF BEGINNING / i r - N tl \ \\ !l\ 0 \ I / 1 N. N. �,\ 1 i. N. \ , 6.' \� \ \ / — Co \ N \ ,' /// 0 Of 01) / F �e \\C /// osP'2, P e, PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION An easement over, under, and ocross thot part of Lot 6, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 151, according to the recorded plot thereof, Anoko County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South 51 degrees 33 minutes 43 seconds East, assumed bearing olong the northeosterty line of said Lot 6, o distance of 323.74 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 38 degrees 26 minutes 17 seconds West, 171.33 feet; thence South 64 degrees 17 minutes 10 seconds West. 31.65 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 6, and said line there terminating. Said easement contains ±2.56 Acres (±111,382 Square Feet). Scale: 1 inch - 120feet 2563 204287Dsct,dwg IA/ r ^ , 4 RECEIVED NOV 1 7 2004 CITY OF LINO LAKES • * PIONEER engineering LAND SURVEYORS • CIVIL ENGINEERS 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651) 681 -1914 FAX:681 -9488 LAND PLANNERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ti•N 201 85th Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 (763) 783 -1880 FAX: 783-1883 DESCRIPTION SKETCH FOR NEW BRIGHTON CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES Northwesterly line of Lot 6, _ Most northerly corner of Lot 6, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 151 �! �1 /r AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 151 1 • \ 'yam �'S O• ry ry (p o 0 O / � � GY o - r ?*,O o h�C rl V /JI I TrL „� . Gy� ` 1/ / ryc�t -ro /�O A. _Northeasterly line of Lot 6, / �_ \ - AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 151 /R4 O \-\ \ ;39 5,31- `5, 4 ■ ■ ■ N x ^r r . 26 v1 $4� �0 00.. W Southwesterly line of Lot 6, _ AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 151 PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION N Arn I VV. / �rI L, 2034 . An easement over, under, and across thot port of Lot 6, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 151, occording to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning of the most northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, assumed bearing olong the northwesterly line of said Lot 6, o distance of 136.00 feet; thence South 47 degrees 39 minutes 53 seconds East, 20.60 feet; thence South 66 degrees 10 minutes 32 seconds Eost, 34.10 feet; thence North 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 128.78 feet to the , or thecstcrty lint of said Lot 6; thence northwesterly along soid northeasterly line to the point of beginning. Said eosement contoins ±7,128 squore feet ( ±0.16 ocres). AND An eosement over, under, and ocross that port of Lot 6, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 151, occording to the recorded plot thereof, Anoko County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing of the most northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, assumed bearing along the northwesterly line of said Lot 6, o distance of 170.00 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence South 47 degrees 39 minutes 53 seconds Eost. 55.00 feet; thence South 42 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, 26.45 feet to the southwesterly line of soid Lot 6: thence northwesterly olong soid southwesterly line to soid northwesterly line of Lot 6; thence northeasterly along soid northwesterly line to the point of beginning. Said easement contoins ±1,558 squore feet (±0.04 acres). 2563 204287Dsc1.dwg 12/06/04 Scale: 1 inch _12 0 feet • Environmental Memo To: Mike Grochala From: Marty Asleson CC: Paul Bengtson Jeff Smyser Date: November 2, 2004 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations /October 27, 2004 The Environmental Board made the following recommendations at the October 27, 2004 Environmental Board meeting: Fox Den Acres Environmental Board recommended approval of Fox Den Conservation Development including: • Rezoning to residential planned unit development • Preliminary Plat with conditions listed in the P & Z Report • The development of an approved Stewardship Plan • Use of standard Best Management Practices for site development and Natural Resources. Motion by O'Dea to approve, second by Bor. All were in favor. Motion passed. • Page 1 • Amendment to the Growth Management Ordinance • Motion to approve the changes to the Growth Management Ordinance by Smith, second by O'Dea. All were in favor. Motion passed. Mike Vaughan Subdivision The Environmental Board recommended the approval of the Mike Vaughan Subdivision proposal with the following comments and recommendations: • Save as many trees as possible • Mitigate any oak wilt started on the site • The rain gardens should use the City Native Seed Mix, and the developer should hire a nurseryman experienced in native plant establishment to plant and manage this area for at least 3 years. • Under the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Notes of the proposal, Item 2 should say that 4 inches of topsoil will be thoroughly tilled into the soil • The notes should include a statement that "no soil shall be imported or exported from the site with out City approval • Under the Stormwater Prevention Plan Notes of the proposed plan, their should include a statement that the City will be notified when storm water must be treated with altemative BMPs and agree to them • Under the notes section of the proposed plan, the note on external washing of construction vehicles should include the washing of intemal components of cement trucks and be limited to a defined area • An additional stockpiling of rock should be on hand, on the site to top dress rock entrances should existing rock entrances become filled up • The ponds should be dug with minimum compaction equipment and fenced off to further traffic during construction. • The notes should indicate that the site soils will be restored to pre - construction densities and that this would be accomplished by tilling, plowing, disking, or ppi► ig. • The Developer should provide adequate landscape screening to adjacent residences. This screening if in rain garden and treatment pond areas should be appropriate for these areas. The screening and recommended 1 boulevard tree per house frontage should be approved by the City. • Have Staff look at the feasibility of an alternative to a cul- de-sac design • Page 2 • Establish a mechanism for a no -mow buffer around wet areas that can be enforceable. Post signage for these areas. Motion to approve with comments and recommendations by Grundhoffer, second by O'Connel. All were in favor. Motion passed. Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses The Environmental Board recommended that this project be referred back to staff for further review, and come back to the Environmental Board at a later time. Issues include: • Submittal of a lighting fixture plan to include any sign monuments. Demonstrate that light glare would not be seen from the lake. • Discuss a lighting and sound time limit for the site use • Septic system feasibility and possible relocation to the front of the building and away from the lake and water treatment areas and agreement to hook up to sewer and water when available. Have a recommendation from County Environmental on the proposed system • Discussion of a way to protect a significant area on the lake side of the project • through a conservation easement or other mechanism • • Adequately address screening needs of shoreland and adjacent residences. Establish proposed changes to species and discuss save areas with City. Redesign to ensure adequate screening in sight lines to adjacent houses. Show ground story cover on site to include a plan to irrigate sod areas. Agree to use of native plants in drainage and water treatment areas. Use City Seed Specs. • Look at altemative design to NURP. Design to a more appropriate rain garden. Include rain garden areas for water coming off parking lots and other treatment features like grassy swales, to larger rain pond treatment area. Include pervious parking if possible. Motion by O'Dea, second by Bauman, to refer back to staff for further review. An were in favor. Motion passed. Friends of the Mississippi Storm Water Management Ordinance Review Recommendation to move forward with this project Motion by O'dea, second by Bor. All approved. Motion passed. Friends of the Mississippi River Water Quality Workshop Recommend moving forward with the workshop. Motion by Smith, second by Grundhoffer. All were in favor. Motion passed. • Page 3 • Appointments to the AUAR Advisory Panel • • The Environmental Board elected to have the foliowing Environmental Board members on the Advisory Panel: 1. Terri O'Connell /alternative 2. Dennis Smith 3. Barbara Bor 4. Barbara Bauman Motion to Approve by O'Dea, second by Grundhoffer. All were in favor. Motion passed. Hardwood Creek Rehabilitation Project The Environmental Board was in favor of a Council Resolution supporting the best environmental option for the rehabilitation of Judicial Ditch 2/Hardwood Creek. • Page 4 • • Memorandum DATE: January 6, 2005 TO: Paul Bengtson FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Kingdom Hall Jehovah's Witnesses Attached is the TKDA review dated January 6, 2005, of the submitted documents for the Kingdom Hall Jehovah's Witnesses site. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this project. Please contact me with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 6 Fax: 651- 982 -2499 ® TDD: 651- 982 -2410 TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292.0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Engineering Review of City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota New Brighton Kingdom Hall Copies To: Jehovah's Witnesses Project No. 13265.002 From: Patrick M. Windler, P.E. Routing: Date: January 6, 2005 The church members of the New Brighton Kingdom Hall Jehovah's Witnesses are proposing to construct a new worship and meeting facility along the southeast side of Lake Drive (Anoka CSAH 23) and to the north of Second Avenue. This parcel abuts the Rice Lake Wetland and Lake complex on its southeasterly side. The proposed church worship and meeting building will be approximately 4,200 square feet with a drop -off carport. A concrete pavement parking lot capable of handling approximately sixty (60) passenger vehicles is proposed. Water supply (private well) and sanitary sewer (septic tanks /drainfield) systems will be on -site systems as currently no public service is available. The following engineering review is based on the documents as listed below: 1. Previous Lino Lakes engineering reviews by Patrick M. Windier, P.E. dated November 1, 2004, and Stephen W. Hartley, P.E. and dated November 4, 2004. 2. Cover letter of submitted items from David Knutson of the New Brighton Congregation of Jehovah Witnesses dated December 17, 2004; one page, stamped received in Lino Lakes City offices on December 17, 2004. 3. "Wastewater Treatment System - Design #2" by Daniel Weaver of Earth Science Testing and dated November 24, 2004; 14 pages, stamped received in Lino Lakes City offices on December 17, 2004. 4. Rice Creek Watershed District permit #04 -150. This is a "Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes" (CAPROC) document from the November 22, 2004, Board Meeting; five pages, stamped received in Lino Lakes City ()tikes on December 17, 2004. 5. Two separate easement documents from Pioneer Engineering with no date or signature block, stamped received in Lino Lakes City offices on December 17, 2005 (2 pages). 6. "Wetland Delineation Report - Lake Drive NE Site" provided by Pioneer Engineering (Ken Arndt, Wetland Specialist) dated November 8, 2004, stamped received in Lino Lakes City offices on December 17, 2004 (3 pages). An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Engineering Review of New Brighton Page 2 January 6, 2005 Kingdom Hall Jehovah's Witnesses 7. "Drainage Computations using HydroCAD" stormwater runoff, routing and ponding computer modeling for 2 -Year, 10 -Year, and 100 -Year design rainfall events as provided by Pioneer Engineering (Rodney Gordon, P.E.) dated October 4, 2004, stamped received in Lino Lakes City offices on December 17, 2004 (19 pages). 8. Site Plan Sheets for "New Brighton Kingdome Hall" as provided by Pioneer Engineering and signed by Rodney Gordon, P.E.: a. Drainage Plan (1 plan sheet) dated December 17, 2004. b. Attachment "A" (1 plan sheet) dated December 17, 2004. c. Erosion Control Plan (1 plan sheet) dated December 17, 2004. d. Grading Plan (1 plan sheet) dated December 22, 2004. e. Site Plan (1 plan sheet) dated December 17, 2004. All of the above plan sheets were stamped received at the City of Lino Lakes offices on December 17, 2004, except for the Grading Plan which was stamped received on December 22, 2004. Engineering Review Comments: Easement Issues: • The submitted easements are to be described by their function or type. Show and/or label the easement(s) on the grading, site, drainage, and erosion control plans. • As a minimum, a ten (10) -foot wide easement (D & U) parallel and along the Lake Drive right - of -way will be required. Also, a five (5) foot wide easement will (D & U) along the side lot lines of the parcel will be required. 2. Provide the Lino Lakes City Engineer with a copy of the requirements with approvals from the Anoka County Highway Access Permit process for driveway access onto a County road. The City will need to review the Anoka County requirements and may have further requirements. 3. Stormwater System Issues: The stormwater drainage calculations are generally the same documents that were previously reviewed as part of a Lino Lakes engineering review(s) from November 1 and 4, 2004. In general, the plans with the revised stormwater system do not coincide with the HydroCAD storm modeling report. The flood/peak elevations in the HydroCAD report do not match the pond elevations as shown on the plans. Storm piping is calculated in the HydroCAD model, but none is shown on the plans. That is, the plans and the HydroCAD calculations must be reconciled using the following requirements: a. The drainage divide area map for existing and proposed conditions must be labeled to coincide with the HydroCAD storm modeling calculations for the 2 -Year, 10 -Year, and 100 -Year design rainfall events. 411 b. While using NRCS type "A" soils for the pre - development (existing) conditions is acceptable, it is required that NRSC type `B" soils are used for the proposed development conditions. Engineering Review of New Brighton Page 3 January 6, 2005 Kingdom Hall Jehovah's Witnesses • c. Make sure the storm drainage calculations take into account and calculate all the proposed rain garden stormwater capacity by infiltration rate analysis. d. Label conspicuously on the plans the stormwater overflow locations. Especially show and explain where the stormwater overflow will go for the proposed area along the Lake Drive corridor. e. Show elevations and/or plan detail(s) of the proposed stormwater riprap system between the parking lot curb line to the stormwater pond labeled as "Water Quality Pond" located at the east side of the proposed parking lot. Also, show elevations and/or plan detail(s) for the overflow riprap structure from the proposed rainwater garden to the east and the Rice Lake watershed. f. It is recommended that the proposed wood skimmer structure between the "water quality pond" and the infiltration rainwater garden be modified to a manhole and piping alternative system. Generally, wood skimmer structures are susceptible to shorter useful life spans and require more maintenance. • • 11 -11 -2004 • Lino Lakes City Council & Zoning Board: We regret we were unable to attend the public hearing on 11 -10 -2004 regarding application for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for construction of a church at 69XX Lake Drive. We, the undersigned are totally against such an idea or plan, period. We live just 100' away from those 2 lots and would much rather see a couple of houses built there for tax reasons and traffic reasons. Please let us know if this matter comes under any further consideration. Thank you very much. • William C. Loss Wanda F. Loss • 6,7 Justin T. Loss n... (Our address is 6956 Lake Drive, Lino Lakes, Mn. 55014) OV r62004 CITY 0R L KEs 1 • • AGENDA ITEM 5B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul F. Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: January 12, 2005 TOPIC: Variance to allow a 1.2 -foot side yard setback for a detached accessory structure (garage) where 5.0 feet is required. Kenneth Muehlstedt 2221 Reiling Road BACKGROUND According to city records, a building permit was issued for a 26 -foot by 30 -foot (780 square foot) detached accessory structure (garage) for the subject property on April 21, 1987. At some point the property owner built a 10 -foot by 30 -foot (300 square foot) addition to the rear of the garage without obtaining the proper building permits from the city. The city received, as part of a building permit application for the adjacent property to the west, a certificate of survey from Kurth Surveying, that depicted the addition as being within the five foot setback area as required in the R -X (Rural Executive) zoning district. On April 23, 2004 the City of Lino Lake's Building Department contacted the resident at 2221 Reiling Road in regards to the certificate of survey submitted for the construction of a single family dwelling at 2215 Reiling Road. This survey depicted a portion of the existing detached accessory structure (garage) setback 1.2 feet from the side property line. The resident was informed that the structure would either need to be made to meet the 5.0 feet setback, and if it were to remain in any way, the resident would need to obtain a building permit. The City of Lino Lake's Building Department again contacted the resident at 2221 Reiling Road on September 17, 2004 to reiterate the options for the existing detached accessory structure (garage). On November 24, 2004 the Community Development Department received an application for this Variance request to allow a 1.2 -foot side setback for a detached accessory structure (garage) where 5.0 feet is the minimum required by the zoning ordinance. • • • Muehlstedt Variance January 12, 2005 page 2 ANALYSIS Land Use and Zoning The following table summarizes the zoning and land use of the subject property, as well as surrounding properties: Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Subject Property Rural R -X (Rural Executive) North Rural R -X (Rural Executive) East Rural R -X (Rural Executive) South Rural R -X (Rural Executive) West Rural R -X (Rural Executive) Setback Requirements Section 5, Subdivision 2 of the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance requires that a 5- foot side setback be provided for all accessory structures. The applicant never applied for building permits for the garage addition. The building permit application for the adjacent property identified that this addition was not in conformance with the five -foot setback requirements. Specifically, a variance to allow a 1.2 -foot side setback where 5 feet is required is now being requested by the property owner post construction. Whether this item is approved or denied, ultimately all building codes will need to be met, specifically the requirement that any part of the structure that lies within three feet of the property line will need to be one -hour fire rated construction. Since the structure was built without a permit the building department has not completed any of the required inspections to determine if it was constructed in such a manner to meet building codes. Staff is recommending that no matter what the decision of this board or the City Council, a very specific procedure and timeline should be established in the resolution for this action. FINDINGS In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The site is ample enough in size to allow a detached accessory structure (garage) within the code requirements. b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. • Muehlstedt Variance January 12, 2005 page 3 The landowner clearly created this plight by building a garage addition, without a building permit, that does not meet the setback requirements. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. The property can certainly be put to a reasonable use without the garage addition, or by eliminating that portion of the garage addition that does not meet the setback requirement. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. No other properties in this district would typically be allowed to encroach this far into a required setback. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The requested variance would clearly contradict the setback standards for this • zoning district. • OPTIONS 1. Recommend denial of the proposed Variance. 2. Recommend approval of the proposed Variance. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the following: 1. Denial of the Variance request based on the above findings of fact. 2. Within 30 days of the City Council's final action the property owner is required to apply for a building permit for any portion of the un- permitted structure that is to remain. This permit application will need to include a survey of the subject property along with any other documentation required by the Building Department. 3. Any portion of the un- permitted structure that is to remain must comply with all building code requirements. 4. Within 90 days of the City Council's final action the un- permitted structure must be brought into conformance with the setback requirements. ATTACHMENTS Location Map Certificate of Survey for 2215 Reiling Road submitted November 24, 2004 Applicant's photographs submitted November 24, 2004 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY (MEASUREMENTS SHOWN IN FEET AM) DECIMALS OF A FOOT) THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY ' OR LLD-io .cttDtLad -._x_Y PROPOSED Y CERTIFY THAT TNIS PLOT PLAN WAS PREPARED WEIR UNDER In DIRECT St1PERYISION , THAT THI ',LAN CORRECTLY SHOWS ME PLACEMENT OF A PROPOSE BUILDING ON THE LAND HEREON DESCRIBED AND I AM STATE WW SURVEYOR LAVS Randy L, Kurth. L L.S. No. 20270 Runnels J. Kurth. L.I.S. No. 15113 IL KINK SOMA A 4002 ,EFFEPS 4 ST. N.E CO11DIA If HiS. W. 55421 (703) 788.9769 FAX (7631 788 -7602 GRADES CA�t 0..7 p GRADES DATE .�...:.__.�_. _ -- .._ --- 0 IRON MONUMENT 4)t BEARINGS ARE PER PLAT GARAGE SLAB • e t'5 e SPIKE SET °I t ,,0 c • EXISTING ELEVATION TOP OF BLOCK • Ate, ID • t I • PROPOSED ELEV. • — _.. E-- • DRAINAGE .ARROW q4 (n, O 615. g�30 1 7 BASEMENT FLOOR 0454it to" (rn5, t39°tq',p "( 138 '� r rr93 i r ,r r / a \" • I d / r �• , / f 01r•S • /',r / , t r 10 T1-.-' ` i SCALE IN • ••••""'" • ••••""'" -0- r t r 1 GARAGE FEET t;9 DR � )t Cer IE:IN.2 ---- fV1',60. I is 5a \ 16 o • 44° .% ‘ tzr 9 t�Mg7 qt 04..0 1,, • 14\ t.rt I Ais �n 1 9 auq \1� ,.et1 r YrV.\ tc =At3h LOT 10, OTTER LAKE HILLS, ANOKA COUNTY• MN. ot1 cHviLO ■b R E I L I N G (boy v..'(w) , ,,nsc,OTTER 1 -J7.02 t.5r14 1••Ja • {I) ti E. 14 i,;(.TEI:Cir, fr1) C ET+4 L01— OTfEL, LE 1-4 LLS Pt 1,1 It 2 Co r j Akcp, F GAO\ Tot\-r- lak S JErEO FDR , FILE COPY • , *lir?? iEQOES- ftJ VIAQIN-ACE. )•••:: ;r4y, • • f 11 OE t-1 L-S-176 Ur; HJtJ6T L_o-r 1 OTTEP, LILA kJ) E R LL SEP 25 2C04 F-LE COPY • • AGENDA ITEM VI A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: January 12 , 2005 TOPIC: Temporary Signage BACKGROUND We have been discussing the temporary signage issue for some time. The goal is to prepare amendments to the existing sign ordinance. At the November meeting, the P & Z agreed on specific requirements for portable signs and banners (see attached). These will be incorporated into a ordinance amendment. No signs are to be allowed in road rights of way. Because traffic signs, lamp posts, and the like are in the right of way, signs would not be allowed to be attached to such things. Stringers/Pennants: A common attention - getting device is the string of small flags or other elements that flap or flutter in a wind. This is a form of signage that may or may not include words conveying a message. The current sign ordinance addresses them as follows: "Banners, ballons, stringers are prohibited unless approved in conjunction with a portable sign permit." (Section IV.E) The ordinance does not include a definition of "stringers ". We suggest that we include a definition as follows: Pennant or Stringer: Any lightweight plastic, fabric, or other material whether or not containing a message of any kind, suspended from a rope, wire, or string, usually in series, designed to move in the wind. The next question is how to regulate them. Should we • allow them with a portable sign permit, or • prohibit them completely? Window Signs: While one might hold the opinion that excessive window signage is unattractive, we suggest that signage inside a building should not be regulated by the sign ordinance. • • • Result of P & Z Discussion of November 2004 BANNER Definition A temporary sign made of cloth, flexible plastic, or other fabric Maximum Size: 32 square feet Attachment: All four corners must be attached to the principal building on site Permit: Portable Sign and Banner permits are held to the following standards: 1. One portable sign or banner is allowed per permit 2. One permit is allowed per quarter of any calendar year 3. Permit is good for 17 consecutive days 4. Permit period always begins on a Friday 5. Double permit fees will be assessed if the permit is pulled after the sign is placed 6. The City has the right to remove the sign at the end of the permit period and collect the cost of removal from the permit holder and/or property owner. Fee: $25 per permit. PORTABLE SIGN Definition A temporary sign designed to be moved from one location to another Maximum Size: 32 square feet Setback: Five feet from any property line Permit: Portable Sign and Banner permits are held to the following standards: 1. One portable sign or banner is allowed per permit 2. One permit is allowed per quarter of any calendar year 3. Permit is good for 17 consecutive days 4. Permit period always begins on a Friday 5. Double permit fees will be assessed if the permit is pulled after the sign is placed 6. The City has the right to remove the sign at the end of the permit period and collect the cost of removal from the peiuiit holder and /or property owner. Fee: $25 per permit.