Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/09/2005 P&Z PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, March 9, 2005 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Swearing in of new board members II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 9, 2005 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Preliminary Plat for Marshan Lakeview, James Funkhouser, 595 Marshan Lane — Paul Bengtson B. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for Circle Pines Registered Land Survey for Lots 11 and 12, Block 8, and Lots 9 -14, Block 10, Lexington Park Lakeview — Jeff Smyser C. PUBLIC HEARING for a Rezone to GB - General Business, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and Allocation of Commercial MUSA for a five -lot commercial development named Apollo Landing, Equinox Development LLP, 540 Lilac Street — Paul Bengtson D. Final Plat for Vaughan Addition — Paul Bengtson E. Final Plat for West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition — Paul Bengtson • VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS • A. AUAR Update — Development Scenarios B. Temporary Signs C. GTS Training VII. ADJOURN • • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT : February 9, 2005 . 6:32 P.M. . 8:35 P.M. : Hyden, Laden (arrived at 6:54 p.m.), Pogalz, Rafferty, Root (arrived at 6:42 p.m.), and Tralle. : None. : Jeff Smyser; Michael Grochala; James Studenski; and Paul Bengtson I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Rafferty called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:32 p.m., February 9, 2005. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Rafferty noted Item number F had been withdrawn. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JANUARY 12, 2005 Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to approve the January 12, 2005 Minutes and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 3 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Rafferty declared Open Mike open at 6:34 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:35 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 3 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. Elect Chair and Vice -Chair for 2005 MOVED TO END OF AGENDA. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2005 Page 2 B. PUBLIC HEARING for a Preliminary Plat, Angie's Acres, Al Powers, 290 Elm Street Staff stated applicant had requested approval of a single - family residential development entitled Angie's Acres. The subject property is located adjacent to the southeast corner of Elm Street and Rice Lake Lane and is currently developed with one single - family dwelling. The applicant is proposing to divide the 39,600 square foot lot into two buildable lots of 23, 346 square feet and 14,610 square feet; and one 1,644 square foot outlot that will be combined with the property owner to the south. The existing single - family dwelling will remain on the larger lot, and the smaller lot will be used for new construction. Staff reviewed their analysis and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Both lots shall connect to city sanitary sewer and water, assessments for both lots will be recorded with the final plat. 2. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 3. Park dedication shall be paid in accordance with city policies. 4. The outlot will be combined with the southern property at time of recordation. Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 6:40 p.m. Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Chair Rafferty asked if there was an outlot to the south of the property. Al Powers, applicant, replied there was an outlot and it would be quit claimed to the adjoining property. He indicated he had spoken with those property owners and they were in agreement with this proposal. Mr. Root arrived at 6:42 p.m. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this application to make comment. There were no comments made. Mr. Pogalz asked if Mr. Powers agreed to all of staff's recommendations. Mr. Powers replied he was in agreement with them. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 6:43 p.m. and was seconded by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 4 -0. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend approval for a Preliminary Plat for Angie's Acres, Al Powers, 290 Elm Street subject to the conditions as noted in staff's February 9, 2005 report and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 4 -0. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2005 Page 3 C. PUBLIC HEARING, for a Preliminary Plat, Marshan Lakeview, James Funkhouser, 595 Marshan Lane Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 6:46 p.m. Staff stated applicant had requested approval of a single - family residential development entitled Marshan Lakeview. The subject property is made up of two lots located at the end of Marshan Lane and is currently developed with one single - family dwelling. The applicant is proposing to divide the 121,374 square foot lot into four lots of 35,088 square feet, 11784 square feet, 15,419 square feet and approximately 42,000 square feet. The existing single - family dwelling will remain on the largest lot. Also depicted on the preliminary plat are a couple of outlots that were created as part of the Marshan Estates plat. These outlots will be combined with the adjacent properties as part of his proposed plat. Staff presented their analysis and noted staff had a discussion with the property owner this morning regarding the layout of the development. He noted applicant was not sure of the layout and therefore, staff was requesting the public hearing be opened, comments taken, and the public hearing be continued to the March P &Z meeting. Mr. Laden arrived at 6:54 p.m. Mr. Hyden asked if the street would still go through. Mr. Bengston replied there was an emergency access easement, which was not an official road. Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Jim Funkhouser, 595 Marshan Lane, stated he was requesting a continuation of the public hearing to address the layout of the development. He noted some large oak trees would be lost with the development as proposed. He indicated he would like time to look at other options in order to save more trees. He stated he wanted a development as sensitive as possible to the trees and the environment. Chair Rafferty asked how long has he lived in the City. Mr. Funkhouser replied he had lived in the City for 36 years. Mr. Funkhouser asked for a two month delay. Mr. Smyser replied the delay could be as long as he wanted, but staff needed the request in writing. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this application to make comment. There were no comments made. • Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to continue the public hearing and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2005 Page 4 D. PUBLIC HEARING for Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review to allow for additions to existing building, Molin Concrete, 415 Lilac Street Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 6:59 p.m. Staff stated applicant proposes two additions to the existing facility at 415 Lilac Street. One is an outdoor storage bay with an overhead crane, and the other is a 17,500 square foot addition to the precast fabrication area. Staff indicated applicant's property is covered by a conditional use permit for the concrete plant. The northern 20 acres is covered by an interim use permit for outdoor storage. This new application does not involve the storage area. The Conditional Use Permit covers the entire site. Building additions such as those proposed in the application require an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. Staff noted under the new zoning ordinance, the site plan review is done administratively. However, a Conditional Use Permit amendment is necessary, and a site plan review is part of the CUP review. Staff stated because this application involves the CUP amendment, it is appropriate to review the conditions placed on the site through the last CUP amendment in 2003. Staff presented their analysis and recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review subject to the following conditions: 1. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 2. Exterior lighting fixtures shall be hooded and directed to reflect light away from neighboring residential properties and right of way. The fixtures must be a 90 degree cut off angle. 3. All conditions in Resolution 01 -182 continue to apply. Mr. Hyden asked if a concern over the landscaping should arise, who would bring this concern forward. Mr. Bengston replied if the P &Z felt it was necessary, there could be a condition added, or staff could look at this if there were any concerns brought forward. Mr. Hyden stated he understood it was difficult to get landscaping growing on the berm. He asked if that was no longer a concern. Mr. Bengston replied he understood the landscaping was planted and this was no longer a concern. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this application to make comment. There were no comments made. Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2005 Page 5 Randy Molin, Facilities Manager, stated with respect to landscaping when staff came out in 2003 they were doing some reconstructive planting. He noted they have had success with the plantings on the berm. He indicated they had taken care of the trees on the lot line, but a number of them had died of natural causes. He stated the other trees were looking good and he believed they had done a good job of taking care of the landscaping. He noted the two trees on the berm were 6 foot tall maple trees. He stated there were bushes on the berm also. Chair Rafferty stated he had the opportunity to have a tour of the Molin plant and was impressed with the facilities and appreciated the tour. Mr. Tralle asked if any of the noise levels would be going up. Mr. Molin replied the outdoor cranes have had favorable comments from the neighbors. He indicated the cranes were electric and very quiet. He stated the reason they were adding the third bay was because at busy times during the year they needed to store inventory for upcoming jobs, so they needed to have room for that material. He stated they were not increasing production. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend approval for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment, and Site Plan Review, to allow for additions to existing building, Molin Concrete, 415 Lilac Street and was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 5 -0. E. PUBLIC HEARING for Circle Pines Registered Land Survey for Lots 11 and 12, Block 8, and Lots 9 -14, Block 10, Lexington Park Lakeview Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. Staff stated the City of Circle Pines wished to acquire a small area of land on the south side of North Road. This area is covered by county road easement for Lake Drive. Over time, the easements in this area became complex. Circle Pines wants to clear up the easement definitions to facilitate their property acquisition efforts. A registered land survey (RLS) is a common means of accomplishing this. The RLS is similar to a plat and must be processed like a plat. The entire area proposed for the RLS is within Lino Lakes, so Lino Lakes must review it. Staff presented their analysis and indicated there were still outstanding issues that called for additional information. Staff recommended opening the public hearing, taking comments, and continuing the public hearing to the March 9 P &Z meeting. Mr. Hyden asked if they needed to find out who the owners are of the tracks. Mr. Smyser replied that was correct that needed to be clarified. Mr. Hyden asked if all of the owners had to be contacted to be made aware of what was going to take place. Mr. Smyser replied that was correct. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2005 Page 6 Mr. Hyden asked if all of this would be accomplished by the next meeting. Mr. Smyser replied that was the plan. Mr. Laden asked if Circle Pines was interested in acquiring the area north. Mr. Smyser replied they were not. Mr. Pogalz asked if the land would be purchased from Lino Lakes. Mr. Smyser replied tract C was private ownership and would need to be purchased. With respect to the property along Sunrise Drive, there was a question of ownership, which needed to be clarified. He stated any land owned by Lino Lakes would need to be discussed as to how it would be purchased or traded. Mr. Hyden asked if Circle Pines purchased the property would the municipal boundaries change. Mr. Smyser replied one City could own property in another City, but it did not mean the boundaries changed. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this application to make comment. Jim Keinath, City Administrator Circle Pines, stated the City was interested in acquiring a small area in Lino Lakes to build a police facility. He noted it was approximately 2 acres total. He stated there would be no change to the underlying property and they would meet with the owners to acquire those properties. Dan Lahlum, 6828 Sunrise Drive, asked how large of a parking lot were they intending on putting in. Mr. Keinath replied he believed the total parking lot area was 28 spaces. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend continuing the public hearing to the March 9 P &Z meeting and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. F. II • Rrokcrs Inc WITHDRAWN G. Final Plat for Highland Meadows East 2 "d Addition Staff stated TSM Development had requested approval of a single - family residential development called Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition. The subject property is currently Outlot A of Highland Meadows East. This plat will create a total of 19 lots. 18 residential lots, and 1 outlot. Staff indicated the final plat substantially conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on July 26, 2004. Some minor adjustments to the width of the middle units have been done but the minimum setbacks discussed in the Preliminary Plat report are still being met. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2005 Page 7 Staff noted the title commitment, final plat, and association by -laws have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review, and are acceptable. As required under the conditions of preliminary plat approval, the applicant has obtained a Rice Creek Watershed permit. All other conditions of approval will be met during the building permit review process, or with the agreement between the applicant and the city. Staff recommended approval of the final plat for Highland Meadows East 2nd Addition. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend approval of final plat for Highland Meadows East 2 "d Addition and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. H. Final Plat for Oakwood View Staff stated the Rice Creek Evangelical Covenant Church has requested approval of a single - family residential development called Oakwood View. The subject property is currently one lot with a house of worship constructed on the southern most portion near the Ash Street frontage. This plat will create a total of 12 lots. One for the existing house of worship, one large lot for the future group residence duplex facility, and 10 single - family residential lots. Staff indicated the final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on May 24, 2004. The title commitment for the property and final plat have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. As required under the conditions of preliminary plat approval, the applicant has submitted a Rice Creek Watershed permit. Another condition of approval required that a shared driveway easement be provided from Ash Street to the property intended for a future group residential duplex facility. The applicant is working on this easement and it will be required to be submitted for review by staff prior to the final plat being scheduled for the City Council. All other conditions of approval will be met with building permit review of the subdivision. A development contract between the applicant and the city is being developed and will address many of the conditions of approval at that time. Staff recommended approval of the final plat for Oakwood View. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend approval of the final plat for Oakwood View and was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 5 -0. I. Final Plat for Century Farm North 3rd Addition Staff stated appplicant had requested approval of a residential development called Century Farm North 3r Addition. The subject property consists of several outlots platted as part of Century Farm North and Century Farm North 2 "d Addition. This plat will create a total of 59 lots consisting of 18 single - family residential lots, 34 attached single - family residential lots, and 7 outlots. Staff indicted the final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on April 28, 2003. The title commitment and by -laws have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2005 Page 8 Staff noted the conditions of the preliminary plat have mostly been addressed through the platting process of the 1st and 2nd additions, and will be enforced in a similar fashion for this addition. Specifically, the townhouse elevations will be held to the same standard development for the 2nd addition, the height restrictions to protect air space for the air park are in place, and the trails for this portion of the development have already been platted by the 2nd addition. Staff recommended approval of the final plat for Century Farm North 3rd Addition. Mr. Tralle asked if park dedication had been resolved. Mr. Bengston replied park dedication had been resolved. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Final Plat for Century Farm North 3rd Addition and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. Chair Rafferty recessed the meeting at 8:00 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:05 p.m. J. Final Plat for Turnberry Crossing (formerly known as Marshan Townhomes 2 "d Addition) Staff stated Hokanson Development has requested approval of a single - family residential development called Turnberry Crossing. The subject property consists of 4.05 acres and will be platted into 23 townhome units and one outlot. Staff indicated the final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on September 13, 2004. The title commitments, final plat, and association by -laws have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review, and are acceptable. Additional right -of -way for Lake Drive is being dedicated as required. The applicant has submitted the revised design to the Rice Creek Watershed District as required by condition number 10 of the Preliminary Plat. The applicant is currently adding a right of access dedication to Anoka County as was required by the Preliminary Plat approval. This revision will be submitted for staff review prior to the items being scheduled for the City Council. All other conditions of approval will be met with building permit review of the subdivision. A development contract between the applicant and the city is being developed and will address many of the conditions of approval at that time. Staff recommended approval of the final plat for Turnberry Crossing. Mr. Root asked if the landscaping issues had been resolved. Mr. Bengston replied all of those issued had been worked out. Mr. Tralle asked if the road to the north was owned half by applicant and half by the townhome association. Mr. Bengston replied the language was still being worked on and this would be done prior to the final plat being approved by City Council. Mr. Tralle asked who would be responsible for the maintenance of the street. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2005 Page 9 Jay Roos, Hokanson Development Company, stated there was an existing private driveway that was maintained by the existing development. He indicated it was the direction of the Council that the developer would provide an access easement dedicated to Marshan Association. He stated they would maintain fee ownership and would dedicate an easement to the Marshan Association and the maintenance responsibilities would be Marshan Association. He stated the appropriate documents would be drafted by their attorney and would be approved by the City's attorney. He acknowledged that Final Plat approval by the City Council would not occur until these documents had been reviewed and approved. Mr. Tralle asked how many color schemes were being proposed for this development. Mr. Roos replied they had not specified an exact color combination, but it would be a masonry siding with a second siding option being shake siding. Mr. Tralle stated this had been discussed at the previous meeting, but he realized Mr. Roos was not in attendance at that meeting. Mr. Smyser stated the City Council had discussed this and had come to an agreement about this. • Mr. Tralle asked if the park dedication issue had been resolved. Mr. Smyser replied the park dedication had been fully resolved and agreed to by the applicant. Mr. Laden asked how the color scheme was going to be resolved. Mr. Smyser replied he could not remember what the City Council's decision was, but he did recall there was a discussion about colors by the City Council and there was a resolution by the City Council and he would check to see what the condition was prior to final plat approval by the City Council. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Final Plat for Turnberry Crossing and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. CONTINUATION OF ITEM A UNDER ACTION ITEMS: A. Elect Chair and Vice Chair for 2005 Staff noted it was necessary to elect a Chair and Vice -Chair of the Planning and Zoning Board for 2005. Mr. Tralle nominated Mr. Rafferty for 2005 Chair. Mr. Hyden nominated Mr. Tralle for 2005 Vice - Chair. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to elect Mr. Rafferty for 2005 Chair and Mr. Tralle for 2005 Vice -Chair and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board February 9, 2005 Page 10 A. AUAR Update Staff updated the Board on the AUAR process. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:35 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • AGENDA ITEM V.A. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: March 9, 2005 TOPIC: Preliminary Plat Marshan Lakeview BACKGROUND James Funkhouser has requested approval of a single - family residential development entitled Marshan Lakeview. The subject property is made up of two lots located at the end of Marshan Lane and is currently developed with one single- family dwelling. The applicant is proposing to divide the 121,374 square foot lot into four lots of 35,088 square feet, 11,784 square feet, 15,419 square feet and approximately 42,000 square feet. The existing single- family dwelling will remain on the largest lot. Also depicted on the preliminary plat are a couple of outlots that were created as part of the Marshan Estates plat. These outlots will be combined into the adjacent properties as part of this proposed plat. At the February 9, 2005 meeting the applicant requested that this proposal be continued to a future meeting so that he could thoroughly review the plans and determine if an alternative existed that could potentially save more of the significant trees on the site. Since that time the applicant has decided that this is the best feasible layout and wishes to proceed with the application. Staff has met with the applicant to define a couple of possibilities that would potentially save some significant trees or allow for a greater buffer between the new lots and the main drive for the city's Legacy project which will be a significant traffic generator. Staff feels very comfortable continuing to work with the applicant to clearly define the location of the cul -de -sac bulb and drainage for the lots prior to the City Council reviewing the application. ANALYSIS The following is a summary of the proposal: Site Area 121,374 square feet Upland Area 99,003 square feet Total Lots 4 Density 1.66 units per acre • • • Marshan Lakeview Page 2 Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Single Family Dwelling Low Density Unsewered Residential & Mixed Use R -1 (Single Family Residential) North City Hall Mixed Use PUD (Planned Unit Development) South Undeveloped Low Density Unsewered Residential & Public / Semi - Public R -1 (Single Family Residential) East City Hall Mixed Use & Public / Semi - Public PUD (Planned Unit Development) West Single Family Dwellings Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) Growth Management Growth Management, Units/Year: The growth management policy limits the number of new residential lots platted each year to a maximum of 147. Recent amendments to that policy have eliminated the 20 % discretionary flexibility and essentially closed the 2005 lots. This application was not received until after that amendment and therefore cannot be platted until 2006. Attached to this report is the current lot inventory, showing that there are 49 available lots remaining for 2006. The proposed subdivision consists of two existing lots, and therefore is only a net increase of two additional lots. MUSA Reserve: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy establish a specific number of MUSA acres for residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The subject site is already within the current MUSA boundary. Preliminary Plat Lots: The minimum lot size in the R -1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district is 10,800 square feet of upland. The lots being created by the proposed plat will consist of a minimum of 10,996 square feet of upland (Lot 1, Block 2). Lot 1, Block 1 is sufficient in size to meet the minimum setback requirements for the existing single - family dwelling. Streets: Marshan Lane will be extended to the east and ended with a cul -de -sac. The unusual shape of the cul -de -sac was requested by staff so it would encompass the entire area of an emergency access easement the city already holds on the property. Marshan Lane will continue to be developed to a rural standard, however the full right of way will be dedicated to the city. Marshan Lakeview • Page 3 • • Wetlands: Wetland exists on the southern part of the property, and would be contained within lot 1 of block 2. Appropriate easements containing the wetland areas and a 10 foot buffer are depicted on the proposed plat. Park / Open Space: The proposal does not include any land dedication for parkland, only a cash dedication will be required. Park dedication fees will be calculated as required by city policy. If the property owner were to follow the Environmental Board's recommendation of donating the wetland area at the south end of lot 1, block 2 it would not count as land dedication for parkland. Anoka County has expressed interest in the donation of the land, and if this is going to be donated it must be platted as an outlot so it can be then quit claimed to the County and subsequently combined with the adjacent County parcel. Utilities: Adequate municipal services exist within the Marshan Lane right -of -way, and all properties will be required to connect to municipal services. Grading and Drainage: Easements are required adjacent to property lines (5 feet side -yard and 10 feet front and rear - yards), and are provided. Additional easements are provided over the ponding area on the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 2. That pond does encroach slightly into the right -of -way, however the City Engineer in his comments states that it is an allowable encroachment as long as it is minimized. The current configuration is acceptable in that regard. The City Engineer has completed a thorough review of the submitted plans, and his memorandum is attached at the end of this report. The applicant will be required to satisfy all of those comments prior to recordation. Environmental Board: The Environmental Board reviewed this proposal at the January 26, 2005 regular meeting. The comments from the board are attached to this staff report and address water run -off, buffering of the wetland, erosion control, soil compaction, saving more trees than proposed, alternatives to the cul -de -sac, and donation of wetland to Anoka County Parks. Marshan Lakeview • Page 4 OPTIONS a. Approve the Preliminary Plat subject to conditions. b. Deny the Preliminary Plat subject to conditions. c. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. All lots created by the plat shall connect to city sanitary sewer and water; assessments will be recorded with the final plat. 2. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 3. Park dedication shall be paid in accordance with city policies. 4. The southern portion of Lot 1, Block 2 should be separated into another lot for donation to the County. Said lot must be subsequently combined with the adjacent County parcel. 5. The applicant shall continue to work with city staff to determine the best possible location for the cul -de -sac within the right of way, and the optimal drainage for the rear of Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1. This review is based on the following plans and information: 1. City Engineer Comments dated 1/21/05. 2. Environmental Board Comments dated 1/31/05 3. Certificate of Survey, Tree Preservation Plan, Resource Inventory, received 12/13/04. 4. Preliminary Plat, Grading/Drainage /Erosion Control Plan, Utility Plan received 1/14/05. • LOTS /UNITS as of February 3, 2005 Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) Development Name approved prelim. plats Prelim Plat Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) 2003 -09 total max. 1029 year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Stoneybrook 103 51 0 2nd Addn 0 52 52 Century Farms North 249 56 65 52 43 33 249 Keefe: prel plat, not final plat 1 1 1 Morton (minor subdiv) 0 1 0 1 Ravens Hollow 56 0 56 56 Haley Manor (10 new lots) 10 10 0 10 Crystal Cove 3 3 0 3 Millers Crossroads 152 22 47 51 32 152 Lakeview Estates (2 new) 2 2 2 Snell (minor subdivision) 0 1 1 Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th 1 1 1 Justin's Preserve 1 1 1 Marshan Estates 4 4 4 Rice Creek Church duplex 2 2 2 Rice Church: Oakwood View 10 10 10 es Addn 2 2 2 ighland Meadows East 2nd 18 18 18 Marshan Townhomes 2nd 23 23 Pheasant Hills 12th island 8 8 8 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add 1 1 1 Vaughan Addition 5 5 5 Angie's Acres (1 new) 1 1 1 proposed Marshan Meadows 21 21 21 Marshan Lakeview (2 new) 2 2 2 total 51 148 176 171 98 33 626 remaining of annual 147 remaining of 1029 for pre -2010 exceeds target of 147 by percent r -29 -24 49 114 147 147 1 29 24 0.7% 19.7% 16.3% 403 • Memorandum DATE: January 21, 2005 TO: Paul Bengtson FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Marshan Lakeview /Funkhouser Estates Attached is the TKDA review dated January 21, 2005, of the submitted documents for the Marshan Lakeview /Funkhouser Estates development. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this project. Please contact me at 651/982 -2430 with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 -982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 • • • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Marshan Lakeview /Funkhouser Estates Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: January 21, 2005 Comm. No. 13265 -002 Routing: The proposed Marshan Lakeview is located at the east end of Marshan Lane on less than 3 acres of property. The plans submitted essentially provide for the platting of property into four single family residential lots. One lot would accommodate an existing house and garage, while new homes would be constructed on the other three lots. A review dated January 4, 2005 was previously provided for this proposed development. Additional documents received since then are as follows: 1. Letters of Transmittal from Plowe Engineering (January 14, 2005) and E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. (January 11, 2005). 2. Full size and half -size copies of the following: a) Certificate of Survey (E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc.) dated January 11, 2005. b) Resource Inventory Survey (E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc.) dated January 11, 2005. c) Tree Preservation Survey (E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc.), dated January 11, 2005. d) Preliminary Plat (E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc.), dated January 11, 2005. e) Marshan Lakeview, Preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, Sheet Cl, (Plowe Engineering, Inc.), dated January 13, 2005. f) Marshan Lakeview, Preliminary Utility Plan, Sheet C2, (Plowe Engineering, Inc.), dated December 13, 2004. Review comments are as follows: General Comments 1) Because the property is residential and less than 5 acres, review and approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) would normally not be required. In addition, it does not appear that there will be any filling into delineated wetland areas. However, as previously stated, because the property is located directly adjacent to a DNR protected water (Marshan Lake), a review by RCWD will be necessary. The plan does indicate efforts to attain quality for surface water runoff by proposing a detention area prior to discharging to Marshan Lake. Copies of correspondence with RCWD must be provided. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Marshan Lakeview /Funkhouser Estates Page 2 January 21, 2005 . City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 2) The proposed site development results in grading (disturbing of property) of over 1.0 acre. The development shall therefore be subject to the requirements of NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) as most recently adopted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the City of Lino Lakes. The applicant shall therefore be responsible for retaining and administering a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with State of Minnesota law. Grading 1) As noted in the previous review, a drainage concern was expressed with regards to Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1. Although the grading plan does indicate an acceptable routing of runoff, special care must be taken during actual construction and final grading to assure that drainage between the two units is attained. 2) As mentioned in the previous review, the applicant shall ascertain the adequacy of the existing soils for the roadway, utility, and house constructions. No soil or geotechnical report is provided. Although the Resource Inventory Survey identifies fine sands for much of the site, any imported material for the site shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. In addition, floor elevations for the proposed housing units must meet the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes as follows: The lowest building opening must be a minimum of 1 -foot higher than detention basin emergency overflow elevation. Basement floor elevations must be at least 4 -feet above the normal water elevation and 2 -feet above the design flood level. The applicant shall be responsible for attaining any permits as required for de- watering. Utilities 1) It is proposed to connect to existing sanitary sewer and water, recently constructed on Marshan Lane. The applicant shall be aware that the sewer is relatively shallow and that low floor elevations and sewer plumbing for the proposed housing units must be designed accordingly. A sewer forcemain service has therefore been proposed for Lot 1. 2) The applicant shall be responsible for the coordination of private utilities (electric, gas, cable, etc. as needed. 3) Individual sanitary sewer and water services for all three units are provided. However, as stated in the previous review, the 6 -inch diameter water main extension shall be revised to 8 -inch diameter in accordance with City standards. The 8X6 reducer proposed at the connection to the existing watermain should be replaced by an 8 -inch gate valve. Insulation must be provided for all sanitary sewer and water (mains and /or services) that will have less than 7.5 feet of cover over the top of the pipe. A detail for the type and installation of insulation must be provided. • • • Marshan Lakeview /Funkhouser Estates City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 3 January 21, 2005 4) Because the utility main extensions will be owned and maintained by the City, as -built records will be required upon completion. This includes plan and profile views of the sanitary sewer and water. 5) The sanitary sewer and services must be placed a minimum distance from existing wells per Minnesota Department of Health requirements. 6) Further construction details and standard plates of the City of Lino Lakes must be provided, including gate valves, hydrant installations, and references to the Standard Utilities Specifications of the City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM). All sanitary sewer services shall be SCH 40 or SDR 26. 7) The applicant will be responsible for obtaining required permits for utility extensions from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and Metropolitan Council Environmental services (MCES). Other Comments 1) The 30 foot street width and 60 foot wide right of ways as shown are acceptable. The right of way has also been expanded as needed to encompass the existing trail easement. Underlying easements and /or dedications no longer needed will require proper legal vacation or elimination by the applicant as part of the platting process as required by the City and Anoka County. 2) A Tree Preservation plan has been provided, and shall be subject to further requirements as may be provided by the City Forester. 3) The new street extension as shown does not conform directly to City standards. However, the street width and pavement section essentially match the existing Marshan Lane, and are therefore acceptable. Some bituminous curbing will be necessary to properly direct drainage to the runoff exit location. Provisions must be also provided for maintaining an access and continuation of the existing trail that runs toward City Hall. 4) The applicant shall be responsible for the verification of any existing well and septic locations on both the subject property and adjoining properties to assure compliance with the State of Minnesota requirements as previously expressed. • Environmental Memo To: Paul Bengtson From: Marty Asleson CC: Jeff Smyser Mike Grochala Date: January 31, 2005 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations /January 26, 2005 • The Environmental Board made the following recommendations at the January 26, • 2005 Environmental Board meeting: Marshan Lakeview Environmental Board recommended approval of Marshan Lakeview including: • Water should be directed from all roofs and impervious areas to open space and pervious areas. • NPDES best management practices should be reviewed and acceptable to the site. • A buffer should be established between the lake and at least 10 feet beyond the delineated wetland boundary. Signage should be placed at this line and there should be education materials given to the new residents concerning the resource issues concerning this buffer. • Any soil disturbance in the 200 -foot from Lake Area must have temporary erosion control or permanent cover within 7 days. The NPDES plan should include how this erosion control will be done, and the permit and inspection reports must be on site at all times. The designated area for these documents should be described on the plan. • Page 1 r • • All soils, especially in pond and infiltration areas should be protected from excessive compaction. Low impact construction equipment should be used and protection fence placed around infiltration areas. No importing or exporting of soils should occur with out City approval. • Make changes to the proposed grade plan to save more trees. Look at directing water from the North between the houses instead of creating a swale (and removing more trees) on the North. Install rain gardens to capture this water in front of the two northern lots. Custom grade the proposed houses to reduce tree losses. • Ask City Engineer to investigate alternative to a cul -de -sac such as a "hammer- head" design. This may save two specimen oaks. Note: The developer is in favor of looking at an alternative design to the street end. This will also reduce impervious surface in a shoreland district. • Donate the area from the South end of lot 1 blk 2, to the wetland delineation area to Anoka County Parks as a permanent protection measure. Owner is in favor of this and Anoka County has been questioned about their interest in accepting this donation. • Work with staff on lessening tree removals and increasing buffers. Motion by Baumann to approve, second by Smith with Staff and Environmental Board recommendations. All were in favor. Motion passed. • Page 2 '0' i NCR_ DUnLFT PRE NJ REt NPE M_I'�I �- GRANULAR FILIER IYANNET SE NOftj NOTE: 111E CONTRACTOR. AT Nis OPTION. Y SIBSBTUTE- A GEOTEXDIE FAPLRC. SPEC. 3801 FOR HE GRANULAR PLt KAMEN UNLESS LW LOSE SPECIFIED M NE. ANS. of FABRIC SHOULD COVER 110 ANFA OF 1H'E WRAP 233110 UNIT. :HE U13.1. APRON O FTET. LEGEND: 1) Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage 2) Denotes Proposed Contour 3) — — Denotes Existing Contour 4)...111.Denotes Silt Fence. 5) X 909.2 Denotes Proposed Spot Elevation GENERAL NOTES A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AT ENTRANCES TO EXISTNG HARD SURFACE ROADS. ROCK ENTRANCE SHALL BE 00 LESS THAN 50' 10 LENGTH AND AS WIDE AS NECESSARY FOR TRAFFIC. USE 1" TO 2" WASHED ROCK. NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO START OF INSTALLATIONS, NOTE: SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BITUMINOUS SURFACE OR GUTTER LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL NOTES L PRIOR TU ROUGH GRADING, INSTALL SILT STOP FENCE M LOCATIONS SHOWN. ADDITIONAL SILT STOP FENCES WILL BE REQUIRED MERE LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE. B. EXCAVATE POND, 3. ROUGH GRADING SHALL PROCEED ON AN AREA BY AREA BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNCOMPLETED AREAS. 0. PROVIDE NATIVE TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCH ANCHORED WITH A STRAIGHT SET DISC IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER GRADING. 5. MAINTAIN AND REPAIR SILT STOP FENCES (INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT) UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED, CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE EXTERCION OF 10001E 6 MIRE INTO THE TRENCH. FILTER FABRIC -ti SITE PLANNING ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEER /NC INC 9180 LEXINGTON AVENUE N.E CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014 (763) 785 -1043 MARSHAN LAKEVIEW PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA /I / / / / / 1 1/ GROUTED RIPRAP SWALE DETAIL 20 oh / r / /1c \ ■ / hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that / om o duly registered pro- fessions/ engineer under the lows of the State of Minnesota. OATS 1/ 13/ 05 REC. NO. 18227 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / 7 7 / / / / / 7 // / / / / / / / S / / FA / WETLAND OHW 883.3 GRAPHIC SCALE D m BD / i \ ( IN FEET) 1 inch ' 30 10 / EMERGENCY OVERFLOW __CE/ASS II GROUTED RIP W% OT�XnLE" ERIC RAP�V�ALE _ RIP RAP WEIR OVERFLOW 89QZ.�\ 5 TON. RIP .RAP' W/ 0'I TILE FABRIC \0 aml s 0 (lfl(1 n=1ul I GE0TEXT1LE FILTER FABRIC 001UTE5 0)0000 1CL 111 SEC. B -B FILE COPY RECEIVED JAN 1 4 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES FINISH CL GRADE B0' 24' CL R/W 0.02 FT/FT 0.02 FT/FT II • TOP OF 5UBGRADE I fl SURGRAOE PREP. MnDOT 2112 4' TOPSOIL I SOD CR SEED AS DIRECTED -1 BY THE ENGINEER L 1.5 2331 BIT. WEAR (TYPE 41) 2 ROWS 500 (TIT.) L TACK COAT L.5" 2331 BIT. 8000 (TYPE 31) 0 CLASS 5 GRATE. (RECYCLED OR 1005 CRUSHED) * STREET SECTION THICKNESS TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING PREPARED FOR JAMES AND JUDITH FUNKHOUSER 595 MARSHAN LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 TYPICAL STREET SECTION IbNs \ DATE. 17/13/04 1/1,1/05 Ennv '10Y C 41011W75 SHEET C1 LEGEND: 1) — — Denotes Existing Contour 2) —> — Denotes Existing Sanitary Sewer 3) —1— Denotes Existing Wotermoin 4) —o-- Denotes Existing Storm 5) —s— Denotes Proposed Sanitary Sewer 6) — 1 — Denotes Proposed Waiermain 7) —)0.— Denotes Proposed Storm / 1)031WV00 00i %S/UN) H.N.A. 1/13/05 CM' CO,VMEN15. 717LE UNAwri H.N.A. CHECKED ` C. W. P. / MARSHAN LAKEVIEW PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA • LO ahw 1 Ofp I I 6' BEND \ ALL SALVAGED HYDRA-NT---- / VALVE \\1 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SALVAGE E. AND VALVE AND PLUG 8" X 6" TEE CONNECT TO 8" WATERMAIN WI X 6" REDU SITE PLANNING' ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 9180 LEXINGTON AVENUE N.E. CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014 (763) 785 -1043 EMAI CORE ERr' LOCK I hereby certify that this pion was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that / am o dully registered pro - lessiono/ engineer under the lows of the State of Minnesota. tit 1- Ay �-�- DATE. 1/13/05 P,£C. N0. 18227 CLASS II GROUTED RIP RAP SWALE W /GEOTEXTILE FABRIC RIP RAP WEIR OVERFLOW 890.2 `5 TON RIP RAP W /,EO TILE FABRIC GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 SO NM ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. VICINITY MAP MAhaVES� Folzham lake Dr P05r Rd 2004 NI EL sicom. N:: 02004 NOVt5 EXISTING UTILITIES 1) The information shown on these arawings concerning type and location of existing utilities is not guaranteed to be accurcte or all inclusive. The contractor is responsible for making his own determination as to the type and locution of utilities es rnoy be necessary to ovoid damage to these utilities. 2) The contrcctor shall be responsible for existing utility locations. Call Gopher State One of 454 -0002 for locutions. SANITARY SEWER 1) Sanitary Sewer shall be 6" PVC SDR 35 unless otherwise noted. 2) All Sanitary Sewer Services shot. be 4" PVC SDR 26 unless otherwise noted. 3) Sewer construcServiction. e locations shall be verified in the field prior to WATERMAIN 1) Water Services shalt be 1 inch copper type K. 2) Wotermoin and hydrant lends shall be 6" DIP CL 53 unless otherwise noted. 3) Curb stops shell be placed at property line. STREETS 1) Sow cut existing Concrete Curb and Bituminous to provide butt joint. 2) Removal and disposal of existing street materials as required for construction is incidental. NOTE: Contractor shall notify City Engineer a minimum of 24 hours prior to any interruption of sanitary sewer or woter service to existing homes. NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL. FIELD vERIFI' LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING SA.NITARI' SEWER AND WATERMAIN AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY INSTALLATIONS. COPY RECEIVED JAN 1 4 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES PREPARED FOR. JAMES AND JUDITH FUNKHOUSER 595 MARSHAN LANE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 DA 06.. 12/13/04 SHEET C2 • VICINITY MAP PARTS OF SEC. 17, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) / / SURVEYOR'S NOTE: - There is a gap between the north line of Outlot D,/ MARSHAN ESTATES and the described boundary. It is our opinion the north line of the road eased:lent referred to in the property description and the r(orth line of Outlot D are the some line. A formal ybodwoy easement description has not been provided d additional Title work has not produced any e cement document. - There is an overlap of descriptions along thb most westerly line of described property and adjoining property of about 3.36± feet as shown on the suyvey. / .4401R0 / / TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTILITY EASEMENTS: 1 15 J 0 I I 51 L 0 Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining side lot lines, and rear lot lines and 10 feet in width and adjoining street lines, as shown on the plot. Drainage and Utility easements to be dedicated over, EOF's, wetlands and ponding areas, and 10 feet on either side of all storm, sanitary, or watermain not within public R /W's. To be determined upon final / site design. \ / \ \ / / 5 / v / 1 l / / /v =ON sa v CY ! e '800 DEVELOPMENT DATA WORTH so GRAPHIC SCALD\ 0 29 50 100 •90110 y07.53x / - PR1 I n g Re t ain OF: MI FOR: JAMES ARSHAN & JUDITH LAKEV FUNKHOUSEEW R 4g�:e3 C N1/4 OF SEC 17, T 31, R 22 _, (CAST IRON MONUMENT) 595 MARSHAN LAKE LINO LAKES MN 55014 PHONE: (651) - 792 -0604 NORTH LINE OF NE1 /4 SEC 17, T 31. R 22" 7g \/\ pPopST. ZrNE e 'gym= wzse.. xpp916.. ^' ............_..........._:... \ ZONE '�. _ .•sae ............._..::. .._.. . ...................'904``' :............. .'........ '..... ''...........9a2 e•N.sa iN• r• LOT AREAS/ • ,,, �A'' ,....:: .....; ` tut � MINIMUM BIJILDING SETBACKS \ '; ........ : .;, %D 30190e4D i: o \ WA' 891.5 ,: di / \ > >40g- ...... Deg a $q g`.f+''' \ rof S� �i � gg9bg'' t 2a tl. 3 fie" cxr y'9a? r9d?• / Wetland = 10 feet (NO construction allowed in this setback) Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lot Area = 10,800 sq. ft. (upland) Lot Depth = 135.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feet Lot Width = 100.00 feet (corner) 200 (IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS: WO TITLE WORK WAS BEEN REC IEVED TO DATE 12- 09-04) Outlot D, MARSHAN ESTATES, Anoka County, Minnesota. (PER SCI -EDUAL A OF CI -ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY FLE NO. 2676588) That port of Government Lot 2 lying within the Northeost Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, lying Westerly of the following described in ' R� 9 n 1^ 9 Y 9 at the Line A and lying Southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the center of said Section; thence North 00 degrees 22 minutes 54 seconds East (assumed bearing) along the west line of said Quarter, 583.02 feet to point of beginning of said line; thence South 65 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds East, 258.02 feet to the intersection with said Line "A' and said line there terminating; Line "A" is described as follows: Commencing at a point on the north line of said Section, 850.00 feet East of the North Quarter comer of said Section; thence Southwesterly to a point on the East -West Quarter Inc I of said Section, 100.00 feet East of the center of said Section and said line there terminating. AND That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, that is described as follows, to -wit: Beginning on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the southeasterly line of State Highway No. 8, as now established, 80.00 feet wide across said tract; thence North 24 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East, along said highway line, for 938.14 feet; thence South 66 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds East 677.50 feet, more or less, to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence North 66 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds West 95.00 feet; thence South 14 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West for 212.00 feet to the northerly tine of on easement roadway, thence South 67 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, along said road line, for 150.80 feet, more or less, to the east tine of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence•North, along said east line, for 226.13 feet to the point of beginning, all in Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to a permanent driveway easement per Document No. 1314776. 4 Proposed Single Family Lots Single Family Lots = 104,889 SQ. FT. (2.41 ACRES) Streets = 16,485 SQ. FT. (0.38 ACRES) Average Lot Size = 26,222.25 SQ. FT. (0.60 ACRES) Density = 1.66 Lots / Acre POINT OF INTERSECTION, SOUTH LINE OF SE1 /4 OF NW1 /4 AND SE'LY R/W OF HIGHWAY NO. 8 SOUTH LINE OF SE1/4 OF NW1 /4 SEC 17, T 31, R 22 Prepared By: C . RUD a SOWS, NG. Survallors 918P LEXINGTON AVENUE NE. CIRCLE PINES, MN. SSO 4 -3625 Tel, 1b3- 186 -555b Fax 163 - 186 -6001 www.egrud.com Total Total Total / ZONE R_1 it NpR Rp,1 - 7[I . l • / a. LEGEND: 0 Denotes Curb Stop s, 3 • Denotes Iron Monument Found /.101. Denotes 1/2 inch by 18 inch iron O Pipe Marked by R.L.S. number 41578 / that needs to be Set. / tKi Denotes Existing Retaining Wall Denotes Sonitory Sewer Manhole Denotes Gate Valve V Denotes Fire Hydrant Denotes Existing Contour - Denotes Existing Fence 010(1.2 Denotes Existing Elevation. 90g� , °a8"s88 • s (d SJ 850.00 Z „L.-Proposed Parking location, not _t Field verified jgfl"_" )i.0 \ f4;.�tFStyn,s• ;'' ` , ,9 , s� :§1 AREA =42,594 c`�' ?Sg 0>6 ;>../i art Existing son •9l' rat; f I/ // •8 Exlslmg - ,_ .1 ' P:F s ?c / // ` `/ .OUee }/ rbq� I AREA = 15,419 820 1. 77 / Proposed Parking 5_ ' location, not field verified A� 0 415,: qox:; roF,' ioNtia:; C 5. 8O >S 9c7 AREA =.01,7841 o. • 87 Denotes Edge of Wetland by Earth Science n i pp. ^.. Denotes Wetland delineated by Earth - - - I -`` Science Inc. Denotes Concrete Denotes Bituminous - - Denotes Setback line AREAS: Boundary Area = 121,374 SQ. FT. (2.79 Acres) Upland = 99,003 SQ. FT. (2.27 Acres) Wetland = 22,371 SQ. FT, (0.51 Acres) BENCHMARK: Minnesota Highway Department disk at 35W Bridge and State Trunk Highway No. 49. Elevation = 918.96 (N.G.V.D. 1929) NOTES: 1/ / E.r ZONE R_ - Ordinary High Water Level of wetlands shall be determined upon Final Design. - Contours are of 2 foot intervals. - N.G.V.D. Vertical Datum - Topography Collected in Fieid by E.G. Rud do Sons between 11 -18 -04 to 12- 06 -04. - Bearings shown ore on assumed datum. - Wetland located by EG. Rud dr Sons Inc. 763) -786 -5556 on 11- 29 -04. - Wetland completed by Earth Science Inc. 651) - 674 -6210 on 11- 23 -04. - This survey was prepared with Title Commitment by Chicago Title Insurance Company, wDD3,258E345" File No. 2876588. - Existing centerline street grades, building pods, proposed contours, and curb information refer to Pre - Grading - Utility plans prepared by Plow Engineering (763) - 765 -1043. CENTER OF SEC 17, T 31, R 22 - -` weD�,.2 ez xee3"D-' i fv�51e .t 79 r= �r'In'4 �7- 32'���"' 183.11 : j oe d, sSre ryry-< DEEbT., 7� 177.39 +fw2- rt� 'LO�d°yp '/ 1 B9B.- sP , 1C:`pj` d• b A 7 Tni 7374776_ t 41 o ZONING: - Property is Zoned R -1 (Single Family Residential) - No Rezoning Proposed GUIDING: - Property guiding Mixed Use. MUSA: - Property falls within the MUSA. - No MUSA amendment proposed 1 AkC 08 j "�O 2 N .00 �O UPLAND /r tO AREA= 10,996` - ..: k':. ...... - -..es e�'BP: fed b8. ..:... as: Qeiiaeated'.by: .Earth- 'Saieriae'.lnb;" da ::. 00:.YEAR:FLOOD .886.1 .'.ONR.:ONWL ar_ 883:3: AREA= 35,088 r 0115 Ai 100.00 ,<w' N89 °41'09 "P' DRAW, e)' 01 -11 -05 505400NS PER C118 NAA JAR DRAPING Na, 04506PP3 JOB NO, 04506PP weer 1 ar 1 N0. DATE DESCRIPTION BY NOTES: 1/ / E.r ZONE R_ - Ordinary High Water Level of wetlands shall be determined upon Final Design. - Contours are of 2 foot intervals. - N.G.V.D. Vertical Datum - Topography Collected in Fieid by E.G. Rud do Sons between 11 -18 -04 to 12- 06 -04. - Bearings shown ore on assumed datum. - Wetland located by EG. Rud dr Sons Inc. 763) -786 -5556 on 11- 29 -04. - Wetland completed by Earth Science Inc. 651) - 674 -6210 on 11- 23 -04. - This survey was prepared with Title Commitment by Chicago Title Insurance Company, wDD3,258E345" File No. 2876588. - Existing centerline street grades, building pods, proposed contours, and curb information refer to Pre - Grading - Utility plans prepared by Plow Engineering (763) - 765 -1043. CENTER OF SEC 17, T 31, R 22 - -` weD�,.2 ez xee3"D-' i fv�51e .t 79 r= �r'In'4 �7- 32'���"' 183.11 : j oe d, sSre ryry-< DEEbT., 7� 177.39 +fw2- rt� 'LO�d°yp '/ 1 B9B.- sP , 1C:`pj` d• b A 7 Tni 7374776_ t 41 o ZONING: - Property is Zoned R -1 (Single Family Residential) - No Rezoning Proposed GUIDING: - Property guiding Mixed Use. MUSA: - Property falls within the MUSA. - No MUSA amendment proposed 1 AkC 08 j "�O 2 N .00 �O UPLAND /r tO AREA= 10,996` - ..: k':. ...... - -..es e�'BP: fed b8. ..:... as: Qeiiaeated'.by: .Earth- 'Saieriae'.lnb;" da ::. 00:.YEAR:FLOOD .886.1 .'.ONR.:ONWL ar_ 883:3: AREA= 35,088 r 0115 Ai 100.00 ,<w' N89 °41'09 "P' DRAW, e)' NAA DAIS. 12-10 -04 wca(D BY: JAR DRAPING Na, 04506PP3 JOB NO, 04506PP weer 1 ar 1 CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under ,waso the laws of the State of Minnesota. (JOHN A. REN( Date: /////0,5- License No. 25344 • VICINITY MAP PARTS OF SEC. 17, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MiNNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) / SURVEYOR'S NOTE: / - There is o gap between the north line of Outlot D. / MARSHAN ESTATES and the described boundary. / It is our opinion the north line of the road easement referred to In the property description and the north line of Outlot D are the some Inc. i A formal `oodway easement description hos not been provided add additional Title work has not produced any easement document. - There is an overtop of descriptions along thp most westerly inc I of described property and odlbining property of about 3.363 feet os shown on the su /vey. Total / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / t90- � / / /I \� GL;;_. ,.951.70 / 0 GRAPHIC SCALE so 100 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS: (O TITLE WORK HAS BEEN RECEVED TO DATE 12-09 -04) Outlot D, MARSHAN ESTATES, Anoka County, Minnesota. (PER SCI -EDUAL A OF CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY FILE NO. 2676588) Thot port of Government Lot 2 lying within the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, lying Westerly of the following described Line "A" and lying Southerly of the following described line: Commencing of the center of said Section; thence North 00 degrees 22 minutes 54 seconds East (assumed bearing) along the west inc I of sold Quarter, 583.02 feet to point of beginning of sold line; thence South 65 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds Eost, 258.02 feet to the intersection with sold Line "A" and said inc I there terminating; Line "A" is described os follows: Commencing at a point on the north Iine of soid Section, 850.00 feet Eost of the North Quorter corner of soid Section; thence Southwesterly to a point on the East -West Quarter line of said Section, 100.00 feet Eost of the center of said Section and said line there terminating. AND That port of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, that is described os follows, to -wit; Beginning on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the southeasterly inc I of State Highway No. 8, as now estobiished, 80.00 feet wide across said tract; thence North 24 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East, along soid highway line, for 938.14 feet: thence South 66 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds East 677.50 feet, more or less, to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence North 66 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds West 95.00 feet; thence South 14 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West for 212.00 feet to the northerly line of an easement roadway, thence South 67 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, along said rood inc. I for 150.80 feet, more or less, to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North. along said east inc. I tor 226.13 feet to the point of beginning. all in Anoka County, Minnesoto. Subject to a permanent driveway easement per Document No. 1314776. AREAS' Boundary Area = 121,374 SQ. FT. (2.79 Upland = 99,003 SQ. FT. (2.27 Acres) Wetland = 22,371 SQ. FT. (0.51 Acres) / BENCHMARK: PO INTERSECTION, _ SOUTH INT OF LINE OF SEi /4 OF NW1 /4 AND SE'LY R/W OF HIGHWAY N0. 8 / Prepared Scg= `. IQUID 4 SONS, INC. eurveuers S1SCD LEXINCaTON AVENUE NE. CIRCLE PINES, MN. 55 @14 -3625 Teal. 163 -186 -8556 Fax 1b3- 186-6001 tww.•arud.eom Acres) Minnesota Highway Department disk at 35W Bridge and State Trunk Highway No. 49. Elevation = 918.96 (N.G.V.D. 1929) SOUTH UNE OF SE1/4 OF NW1 /4 SEC 17, T 31, R 22 1 01-11 -05 REVISIONS PER CITY NM JAR axcenir 1o, 04506CERT Ens NO.: 04506PP .71E17 1 of 1 N0. DAIL' mammas Br C RT IF t CATS OP SU vrr OF: MARSHAK j FOR: JAMES & JUDITH FUNKHOUSER 595 MARSHAN LAKE q61, / / E6 908' ' 90,94r / 90109 x906.93 " nl 907..59 ▪ ., f- -- / / •y\ NORTH - ,0\ eo+o,.,cl at'\•.1 4• THYO °R 09 5� LEGEND: ' , ^ \ ..... _ - a , 000o Denotes Existing Retoining Wall u El Denotes Woodduck House 0 Denotes Curb Stop • Denotes Iron Monument Found Denotes 1/2 inch by 18 inch Iron O Pipe Marked by R.LS. number 41578 that needs to be Set. / t3/ U / / J I 81/4 OF SEC 17, T 31, R 22 _.. (CAST IRON MONUMENT) ' ......., . '.. 898 \\ 6 5 ?._..... %-... w , 673, 10•R''._; y8tl.... ^.,'.......... t4 ▪ te "YS r�'- s (o e J .. , \O) 8(674 / ' ..... \ �75opy Mrs ..... ...... yo. (OF f0) • Ps Ao Ne 'uSEb£4 2.27 -mac- 902.79 900 j1 9,97..14: .pwg9ra9E .{.......7�9Vtt �tq0� qo So-zi 4c4 (50,t 44 I�g9� 14.56 4.75 • 2+ • LINO LAKES MN 55014 PHONE: (651)- 792 -0604 NORTH LINE OF NE1 /4 ___, SEC 17, T 31, R 22-- '1 'y 850.00 `\~ Z mss- Proposed Parking loHcation, eld verified not } I-PO '.....F .9ao1s5! \ i sSy2j0,.� ss�• ai �s3OP idF��J \;; 90,,+.02 50613` a0"1W01ic+< sP <8a1 fs2 tE 0y FtPr 34.8 N sa..5a '�i5T8..,av'• tl ........... 45 Pa 9o"r._A� +an l '' P' 900 g6 / 506HP �� x mTlF ,y. Y's96.7+ 30,1„... \ ( 99.50 6 Denotes Sign ''Q., Denotes Utility Pole 12 Denotes Telephone Box CO Denotes Sanitary Sewer Manhole cv pQ Denotes Gate Valve Denotes Fire Hydrant .,•.W '•,. Denotes Existing Contour nn7 + Denotes Overhead Wire Denotes Existing Fence xlo11.2 Denotes Existing Elevation. Denotes Edge of Wetland by Earth Science Inc/ Denotes Wetland delineated by Earth Science Inc Denotes Concrete Denotes Bituminous Denotes 100 Year Flood Area from FEMA Mops / • • Denotes 100 Year Flood Boundary from FEMA Maps. NOTES: r , , ttb,l 1 Q NO 2 rn AREA A 131 7101 7314776 P 6#' -' , tcn;.t '.•�. _ � 18 � -- ME?3} _ i 1 • :s "69 1719 -..1 d'695.•.. I •� .ev*p7 "tee .s92.72(S8000'7� E (DEEP) f .,n -59a .M........ ON_'' e9• + ,•'Edge of Wetland .. . .......... I 7 as Delineated by .,�. 8q1' m I � • a Earth Sytulce•108:- • F4`,1 t°0co' ,Ezisti,e'• Hous, . � A w W.,e. „r0. ..,+a+: 87995.9.9„ Approximate location of IP N Flood Zone A as (0 • determined by F.I.R.01. __ -- ?.,..� Mop Panel 270015 0100 B .s••` doted May 17, 1982 'I.,. 0.;;;\ — Ordinary High Water Level of wetlands shall be determined upon Final Design. — Contours are at 2 foot intervals. — N.G.V.D. Vertical Datum — Topography Collected in Field by E.G. Rud & Sons between 11 -18 -04 to 12- 06 -04. — Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. Wetland located by E.G. Rud & Sons inc. (763)- 786 -5556 on 11- 29 -04. — Wetland completed by Earth Science inc. (651)- 674 -6210 on 11- 23 -04. This survey was prepared with Title Commitment by Chicago Title Insurance File No. 2676588. — Boundary area not shaded is the approximate location of Flood Zone C (area of minimal flooding) as determined by F.I.R.M. Mop Panel 270015 0100 B dated May 17, 1982. Company. CENTER OF SEC 17, T 31, R 22 ��555162 GUIDING: MUSA: gB7.66 — Property guiding Mixed Use. - Property falls within the MUSA. 100 YEAR; FLOOD = 586.1 sio 100.00 :2 7 N89 °4/'09 "W 42 awo 1 48 ZONING: — Property is Zoned - -R -1 w3 \v1Nsoa Proposed Parking Ideation, not,- ' field verified No 14.• s w kl _0,,11M,0 NAA DATE 12 -10 -04 CHECKED sr. JAR axcenir 1o, 04506CERT Ens NO.: 04506PP .71E17 1 of 1 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. J FIN A. RENG0 t✓ Date: / /// /175' License No. 25344 VICINITY MAP PARTS OF SEC. 17, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MNNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) BENCHMARK: Minnesota Highway Department disk at 35W Bridge and State Trunk Highway No. 49. / i TREE PRESERVATION MEASURES Elevation = 918.96 (N.G.V.D. 1920 \ / / indicating tree protection zone. ` \\� / / ,•1 / Implementation: \ \. \ \ '904. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / •V / 1) Install all silt fence /tree protection fence in locations shown. -,,,, \`°i!r; / CO / 2) Remove trees within the silt fence area as shown (clear zone). Developer and future , \ \ r builders reserve the right to clear any trees not cleared within the clear zone as it"-'••...\ becomes necessary. There shall be no replacement required for these trees. All trees �/ .902\ / Total Total Upl9'nd = 99,003 SQ:' FT. (2.27 Acres) Total WtVtland = 22,371 Q. FT. (0.51 Acres) / / / i TREE DETAIL / \ \ / \ / / ,r -- Denotes Elevation \ / 61- / / / �?.',.t. 'p1 -`t -�` ~�-- Denotes Tree Size in Inches / / wf3 Denotes Tree Quantity (if blank quantity Y(s one) L / Denotes Tree Type / , , , i / \ " M 1 /, PRif N SUR r ,. / AREAS' / \ \ ,, Boun,dory Area = 121/374 SQ. FT. (2.79 Acres) \ / 8pv: ` -� / \ \ SPECIMEN TREE TYPES' // / / ,,, ;= OAK NORTH // \'\ \ '\ GRAPHIC SCALE / / /�"r47 0 ���v \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Sip / i 1` 2� 100 / Acoo \� / `.b \ / 2 / Trke Preservation Measures k\ (IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft I Denotes orange silt fence /tree protection fence placed at edge of mass gradin \ ° f t b d f dl S' t be posted All trees within this ante are o e remove or moss grading. Signs o p � � • •" ... S89732 7 ......, ............ \ 00 0,`,AS) .. l\ 0) ( 0g E \ \� \f0) N1 /4 OF SEC 17, T 31, R 22__ (CAST IRON MONUMENT) rV .........., } ...... ........ ............ ...: �D 0 .4 G . POa! ow , Te"NW p 9oF,�. 9TH :gGN,N tDT'. 9pa.40 7 NFL aosP�kY;, 90.,,5.• p'<"1., N, OF: MARSHAN LAKEVIEW FOR: JAMES & JUDITH FUNKHOUSER 595 MARSHAN LAKE LINO LAKES MN 55014 PHONE: (651)-792-0604 NORTH LINE OF NE1 /4___ SEC 17, T 31, R 22 850.00 ,r- Proposed Parking location, not field verified v. (44. *44, 99 i96"g�� (n: /.:. 0 i7 / 11 II I I ti ti 59 I fiNposee Parking . �p"cation, not_.,,-' d verified / `® . I // {1 / 3,41 i // / v / / / / Prepared By: outside the clear zone shall be preserved and replaced if disturbed per Section 1009, this . ,,,.../. \ • is to be known as the (save zone). AQA ,\ 3) Site to be graded. Any oaks damaged during construction to be treated per Section / : ', "- ; o... N 1009. . 4) Custom graded lots to be reviewed by forester at time of survey for building permit. No tree clearing or mass grading to be done with grading permit. 5) Post grading procedures to follow Section 1009. EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS' (NO TITLE WORK 1-146 eteeN PeCEVED TO DATE 12- 09-04) Oudot 0, MARSHAN ESTATES, Anoka County, Minnesota. 6'ER SCI - DUAL A OF CI -ACAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY FLE NO. 2676588) That port of Government Lot 2 lying within the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, lying Westerly of the following described Line "A" and lying Southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the center of sold Section; thence North 00 degrees 22 minutes 54 seconds Eost (assumed bearing) along the west line of soid Quarter, 583.02 feet to point of beginning of said line; thence South 65 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds Eost, 258.02 feet to the intersection with sold Line "A" and said line there terminating; Line "A- is described os follows: Commencing at a point on the north line of said Section, 850.00 feet East of the North Quarter corner of said Section; thence Southwesterly to a paint on the Eost -West Quarter line of said Section, 100.00 feet East of the center of said Section and said line there terminating. POINT OF INTERSECTION, _ SOUTH LINE OF SE1 /4 OF NW1 /4 AND SE'LY R/W OF HIGHWAY NO. 8 AND That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22. that is described os follows, to-wit Beginning on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the southeasterly line of State Highwoy No. 8. as now established, 80.00 feet wide ocross said tract; thence North 24 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East. along said highway line. for 938.14 feet; thence South 66 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds East 677,50 feet, more or less, to the eost line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence North 66 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds West 95.00 feet; thence South 14 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West for 212.00 feet to the northerly line of on easement roadway, thence South 67 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, along soid road line, for 150.80 feet. more or less, to the east line of soid Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North, along soid cost line, for 226.13 feet to the point of beginning. all in Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to a permanent driveway easement per Document No. 1314776. SOUTH LINE OF SE1/4 OF NW1 /4 SEC 17, 7 31, R 22 e/ s scams, N. SISO LEXiNCsTON AVENUE NE, CIRCLE PINES, MN, 55014 -3625 To I. 163. 186 -5666 Pax 163- 186 - 6021'1 umukiegructcom / 01 -11 -05 REVISIONS PER CITY NAA JAR AAKNC NA, 04506TR£E A a 04506PP sr rer 1 or 1 NO DATE DESCRIPIION BY LEGEND: • Denotes iron Monument Found Denotes 1/2 inch by 18 inch Iron ipa .p, /30 i \1 , '/ / o / / ? o Pipe Marked by R.L.S. number 41578 i Q f ( q 1: that needs to be Set. 1L\ ra Denotes Soil Type from Soil Survey ` /L / \ I / �, by USDA Soil Conservation Service. '{ / See Sand Soil Survey for description \ \ / of soli types. / -. Denotes Existing Contour • f 01011.2 Denotes Existing Elevation. Denotes Edge of Wetland by Earth Science Inc. / Denotes Wetland delineated by Earth \ \ Science Inc. Denotes Concrete I Denotes Clear Zone / \ Denotes 100 Yeor Flood Area from FEMA Mops' • • Denotes 100 Year Flood Boundary from FEMA Maps. ▪ VA.!' % %\969'5}°6` 'e 366 Efistnig\ Hoe -� ,52"., ;697'5, . us hA 140.05 ..: 50-6S 04' .590.4 591.2" 59 / p 0 C .55 NOTES: Ordinary High Water Level of wetlands shall be determined upon Final Design. — Contours are at 2 foot intervals. — N.G.V.D. Vertical Datum — Topography Collected in Field by E.G. Rud & Sons between 11 -18 -04 to 12- 06 -04. — Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. Wetland located by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763)- 786 -5556 on 11- 29 -04. — Trees located and tagged by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763) - 786 -5556 on 11- 29 -04. Wetland completed by Earth Science Inc. (651)- 674 -6210 on 11- 23 -04. This survey was prepared with Title Commitment by Chicago Title Insurance Company. File No. 2676588. — Boundary area not shaded is the approximate location of Flood Zone C (area of minimal flooding) as determined by F.I.R.M. Map Panel 270015 0100 B dated May 17, 1982. See Grading Plan and Certificate of Survey for Hydrologic characteristics. CENTER OF SEC 17, T 31, R 22 110 YEAR. FL000 = 836:.1 r o • ONR OHN7_ 883 3 q 100.00 N89 •41'09"8' ti a �cl a Lti SP� A: Lt MANN BY NAA DAM: 12 -10 -04 CHECKED Dr: JAR AAKNC NA, 04506TR£E A a 04506PP sr rer 1 or 1 CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and thot i am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. OHN A. RE-N00 Date: ( /!l /05 License No. 25344 VICINITY MAP PARTS OF SEC. 17. TWP. 31, RNG. 22 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 50 -? RESOURCE NvEN1TORY 26 GRAPHIC SCALE 50 100 / / / 000 ( W FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. ANOKA COUNTY, MN'. SOTA (NOT TO SCALE) SURVEYOR'S NOTE: / There 's o gap between the north line of Outlot D, / MARSHAN ESTATES and the described boundary. / It is our opinion the north Tine of the road eoseMent referred to In the property description and the forth Inc l of Outlot D are the same line. A formal ``oodwoy easement description has not been provided acid additional Title work hos not produced any edsement document. There is an overlap of descriptions along the most westerly line of described property and adjoining property of about 3.362 feet as shown on the su Ivey. / -1 % 47 V / 3to' i %/ -4. O'Q% / / •800, / / / / / /\ / \ / 1 / t0 / im= �� "e 4 . /� <Q Total Total / r, °"� / s Total / EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS / «40 TITLE WORK HAS BEEN RECEVED TO DATE I2-09 -04) Outlot D, MARSHAN ESTATES, Anoka County, Minnesota. / PER SC! -EDUAL A OF CHCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY FLE NO. 2676588) That part of Government Lot 2 lying within the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, lying Westerly of the following described Line "A" and lying' Southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the center of said Section; thence North 00 degrees 22 minutes 54 seconds East (assumed bearing) along the west line of sold Quarter, 583.02 feet to point of beginning of said line; thence South 65 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds East, 258.02 feet to the intersection with sold Line "A" and said line there terminating; Line "A" is described as follows: Commencing of o point on the north line of said Section, 850.00 feet East of the North Omelet corner of said Section; thence Southwesterly to o point on the East -West Quarter line of said Section. 100.00 feet East of the center of said Section and said line there terminating. AND That port of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Ouuorter of Section 17, Township • 31, Range 22, that is described as follows, to -wit: Beginning on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the southeasterly line of State Highway No. 8, as now established, 80.00 feet wide across said tract; thence North 24 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East, along soid highway line, for 938.14 feet; thence South 66 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds East 677.50 feet, more or less, to the east line of said Southeast Quorter of the Northwest Quarter and the point of beginning of the tract hereby described; thence North 66 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds West 95.00 feet; thence South 14 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West for 212.00 feet to the northerly line of on easement roadway, thence South 67 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, along said rood line, for 150.80 feet, more or less, to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North, along said east line, for 226.13 feet to the point of beginning, all in Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to permanent driveway easement per Document No. 1314776. AREAS: Boundary Area = 121,374 SQ. FT. (2.79 Acres) Upland = 99,003 SQ. FT. (2.27 Acres) Wetland = 22,371 SQ. FT. (0.51 Acres) POINT OF INTERSECTION, _ SOUTH LINE OF SE1 /4 OF NW1 /4 AND SE'LY R/W OF r HIGHWAY NO. 8 Prepared Br: BENCHMARK: Minnesota Highway Department disk at 35W Bridge and State Trunk Highway No. 49. Elevation = 918.96 (N.G.V.D. 1929) SOUTH UNE OF SE1 /4 OF 1481 /4 - SEC 17, T 31, R 22 E. andd .urvego b /��r 3189 LEXINGTON AvENUE NE. CIRCLE PINES, MN. 55214 -3x'25 Tel. 163 - 186 -55Se Pax 163 -186 -6001 wwu,.egrud.com / / WORN \OUT C:\ • \ 1 1 1 1 1 fs8sy �eZ30o01," e \ \ e f4�).......... ` .-. \ 4', es'409•. ...� .. \ S0* 44;4 \ �fo) SLAVE 141/4 OF SEC 17, 1 31, R 22__ (CAST IRON MONUMENT) " ! ....... ........ ..996,.7..`....... -....• h, r-J ............. I.... _ .................... 05 PS 30, ale • NSF e OFD wR -9e4 7777 ' `i I,:�,r�g3.q 6r_49' cYb M 30 pi/ 3o / i , / C/ 1 1 fir; LEGEND: • Denotes Iron Monument Found Denotes 1/2 inch by 18 inch iron o Pipe Marked by R.LS. number 415781 that needs to be Set. \ Denotes Soil Type from Soil Survey \ I by USDA Soil Conservation Service. See Sand Soil Survey for description \ of soil types. � �/ Denotes Existing Contour 01011.2 Denotes Existing Elevation. - - --- -- Denotes Edge of Wetland by Earth Science Inc. I Denotes Wetland delineated by Earth Science Inc. .I Denotes Concrete Denotes Bituminous 1 1 Denotes 100 Year Rood Area from FEMA M9ps — •• — Denotes 100 Yeor Flood Boundary from FEMA Maps. NOTES: Ordinary High Water Level of wetlands sholl be determined upon Final Design. Contours are at 2 foot intervals. N.G. V.D. Vertical Datum Topography Collected in Field by E.G. Rud & Sons between 11 -18 -04 to 12- 06 -04. Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. Wetland located by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763) - 786 -5556 on 11- 29 -04. Trees located and tagged by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763)- 786 -5556 on 11- 29 -04. Wetland completed by Earth Science Inc. (651)- 674 -6210 on 11- 23 -04. This survey was prepared with Title Commitment by Chicago Title Insurance Company. File No. 2676588. Boundary area not shaded is the approximate location of Flood Zone C (area of minimal flooding) as determined by F.I.R.M. Map Panel 270015 0100 8 dated May 17, 1982. See Grading Plan and Certificate of Survey for Hydrologic characteristics. OF: MARSHAN LAKEVIEW FOR: JAMES & JUDITH FUNKHOUSER 595 MARSHAN LAKE LINO LAKES MN 55014 PHONE: (651) -792 -0604 NORTH LINE OF SEC 17, T 31, R22 850.00 1., hr l .I'h• 1 1 • h I ,L- Proposed Porking location, not field verified • 02 -u i7 tr" o '1 • 1 P poaed Puking cotiAn, -' cf verified 0■ 40 \ ��O - '' :....._ �.... i \ e of Wetland - as Delineated by _ ..r' Earth ieocc- ad: ' :Q b '- Co Approximate location of Flood Zone A as determined by F.I.R.M. Map Panel 270015 0100 B "."1 doted May 17, 1982 CENTER OF SEC 17. T 31, R 22 'd 100.00 N89•41'09 "W DEC 1 3 REf•'D CITY OF LINO LAKES TRAP, Bk, NAA DATE 12 -10 -04 ORAew(.' CHECKED VP JAR ma, RESOURCE 04506PP .wrr7 1 or 1 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. HN A. RE G ..UIO Date: / // / /D.S License No. 2.5344 aI -II -OS REVISIONS PER CITY NAA NO. DATE DESCPoPTION BY 'd 100.00 N89•41'09 "W DEC 1 3 REf•'D CITY OF LINO LAKES TRAP, Bk, NAA DATE 12 -10 -04 ORAew(.' CHECKED VP JAR ma, RESOURCE 04506PP .wrr7 1 or 1 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. HN A. RE G ..UIO Date: / // / /D.S License No. 2.5344 STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V. B Jeff Smyser March 9, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING (continued): Registered Land Survey North Road/Lake Drive Area City of Circle Pines The City of Circle Pines wishes to acquire a small area of land on the south side of North Road. This area is covered by county road easement for Lake Drive. Over time, the easements in this area became complex. Circle Pines wants to clear up the easement definitions to facilitate their property acquisition efforts. A registered land survey (RLS) is a common means of accomplishing this. The RLS is similar to a plat and must be processed like a plat. The entire area proposed for the RLS is within Lino Lakes, so Lino Lakes must review it. The P & Z opened the public hearing at the February 9 meeting and continued it to allow for the gathering of additional information to address some unresolved issues. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Zoning The table below identifies the existing land use, guided land use, and zoning for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site residential and road right of way Low Density Unsewered Residential LI Light Industrial North residential Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 Single Family Residential South City of Circle Pines City of Circle Pines City of Circle Pines East residential Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 Single Family Residential West residential and road right of way Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 Single Family Residential • • • • RLS, North Road Area page 2 Discussion In the past, Lake Drive (CSAH 23) was State Trunk Highway 8. It since has been turned over to Anoka County. Apparently, the legal descriptions of the easement(s) for the road are complicated and confusing. The RLS is intended to clarify where the easements are in order to facilitate the purchase of some property by Circle Pines. As long as this was occurring, we took the opportunity to clarify some additional issues. The subject area is within the Lexington Park Lake View plat, which was platted in 1946. The roads were dedicated to the public, as is typical when new developments are platted. The existing lots and the proposed tracts correspond as follows: Lexington Park Lake View (platted 1946) proposed Registered Land Survey Tract Lot 11, Block 8 Tracts C & D Lot 12, Block 8 Tract A & B Lot 9, Block 10 Tracts I & K Lot 10, Block 10 Tract L Lot 11, Block 10 Tract M Lot 12, Block 10 Tract N Lot 13, Block 10 Tract 0 Lot 14, Block 10 Tract P portion of Sunrise Drive Tract J portion of Sunrise Drive portion and North Road Tract F & G portion of North Road Tract E portion of North Road Tract H The proposed RLS does not move any property boundaries. However, it would redefine the property boundaries to incorporate the road easement areas. That is, a parcel that now is one lot with the easement over half of it would become two lots (tracts): one within the easement and one outside the easement. The ownership of the property would not change with the RLS. It would make it easier to vacate the easement or sell property covered by the easement because the legal description of the easement area would become "Tract x of RLS No. ". Outstanding Issues From February Meeting The P & Z opened the public hearing at the February 9 meeting and continued it to allow for the gathering of additional information to address some unresolved issues. There are a number of things that should be clarified before Lino Lakes approves the RLS. • • RLS, North Road Area page 3 Ownership: The ownership of the underlying parcels was not yet been clearly established. We asked Circle Pines for a title search to resolve this. We need to ensure that the needs and rights of Lino Lakes property owners are adequately considered. The table below lists ownership. Sunrise Drive and North Road were dedicated as part of the 1946 plat. Lino Lakes didn't exist when the plat was recorded. Whether the City or County actually own the roads would need to be determined, but this is not a vital point for now. Lexington Park Lake View (platted 1946) proposed Registered Land Survey Tract ownership Lot 11, Block 8 Tracts C & D Clingingsmith & Fletcher Lot 12, Block 8 Tract A & B City of Lino Lakes Lot 9, Block 10 Tracts I & K City of Lino Lakes Lot 10, Block 10 Tract L Clingingsmith & Fletcher Lot 11, Block 10 Tract M Clingingsmith & Fletcher Lot 12, Block 10 Tract N Clingingsmith & Fletcher Lot 13, Block 10 Tract 0 Clingingsmith & Fletcher Lot 14, Block 10 Tract P Clingingsmith & Fletcher portion of Sunrise Drive Tract J Anoka County or Lino Lakes portion of Sunrise Drive and portion of North Road Tract F & G Anoka County or Lino Lakes portion of North Road Tract E Anoka County portion of North Road Tract H Anoka County Land Owners' Agreement on the RLS: On a plat, the signatures of all with interest in the property must sign the plat or sign a separate consent to plat document. The RLS does not have a signature page and the RLS is being proposed by the City of Circle Pines, which is not the property owner of the land in question. The situation is different from a typical plat. Our city attorney discussed this question with the Anoka County Examiner of Titles. The answer is rather surprising. There is no requirement in state statute that a property owner must sign off on or even agree to a registered land survey on his property. While the proposed RLS seems to be splitting property into separate tracts, it is in effect only defining an existing easement by making it a separate tract of land. According to the City Attorney's discussion with the Examiner of Titles, this does not require property owner agreement. Nonetheless, in the interest of fairness, we want the existing owners to be aware of the proposed RLS. Northern Right of Way Line: Several of the attached drawings show the northern road • easement /right of way line running in a southwest to northeast diagonal across the • • • RLS, North Road Area page 4 westernmost area of the RLS. You can see that the line appears in different places on different drawings. We have asked to have this clarified. A revised RLS includes this line and creates separate tracts for property within and without the easement. Needed Right of Way: It is possible that Anoka County may in the future consider vacating areas of the existing easement, which would result in more buildable land on some lots such as Tracts A, L, M, N, and O. We have asked Circle Pines to confer with Anoka County Highway Dept. about the area actually needed for right of way. Maybe this area can be delineated with separate tracts to facilitate future vacations. This information was not available in time for this report. There is no intention to pursue a vacation of the easement, so it is not necessary at this time to address this. It was staff's intent to try to determine if this could be resolved now, but it is not a vital question. OPTIONS 1. Approve the proposed Registered Land Survey 2. Deny the proposed Registered Land Survey RECOMMENDATION Option 1 o � Lu o � ti etz 0 a rz 0 REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Sec. 19, T. 31, R.22 I hereby certify that in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 508, Minnesota Statutes of 1949, os amended. I hove surveyed the following described property situated in the County of Anoko, State of Minnesota: Lot Eleven (11), Block Eight (8), Lexington Pork Lake View. Together with: Lot Twelve (121 Block Eight (8), Lexington Pork Lake View. Together with: Lot nine (9). Block Ten (10), Lexington Pork Lake View. Together with: Lots Ten (10) to Fourteen (14), inclusive. Block Ten (10), All in Lexington Park Lake View. Together with: All tht part of SUNRISE DRIVE as delineated and dedicated on soid LEXINGTON PARK LAKE VIEW lying southerly of the easterly extension of the north line of said Lot 12, Block 8. Together with: All tht part of NORTH ROAD (F.K.A. LAKE DRIVE) as delineated and dedicated on said plat of LEXINGTON PARK LAKE VIEW lying eosterly of the southerly extension of the west line of said Lot 11, Block B and lying westerly of the southwesterly extension of the southeasterly line of soid Lot 10, Block 10. I hereby certify that this Registered Land Survey is a correct delineation of soid survey. Doted this day of . 20 BY: John C. Lorson, Professional Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19828 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this 20 . by John C. Lorson. Minnesoto License No. 19828. day of Notary Public County, Minnesota My commission Expires CITY OF LINO LAKES This Registered Land Survey was approved and occepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 2004. By its Mayor By its Clerk ANOKA COUNTY SURVEYOR Checked and approved this day of 20 * PIONEER *engineering �t 4, ** Larry Hoium Anoko County Surveyor uo .u,.mo ine9,-vr .sa+nee 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (511) 511 -1514 FAX511 -5451 210 95th Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids. MN 55433 (703) 713 -1510 F X 783 -100.3 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS CO LU o o � d CV REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ ?; City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Sec. 19, T. 31, R.22 SECTION 19, TWP. 31, RGE. 22 LOCATION MAP NO SCALE 3 ^,1 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET (PLAT) = DENOTES PLAT DIMENSIONS PER THE PLAT OF LEXINGTON PARK LAKE VIEW 3r 0 O = DENOTES FOUND ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT. • = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT. o = DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NUMBER 19828. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS R.L.S. THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC. 19, T. 31, R. 22, IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF 588'59'08 "W. * PION®ea * engineering wo PLANERS• wasc.rr.ea.,a-n J 46 J • s 1 ( s7) ` TRACT L (421g MEP s. p�Pt) , 4183 (310.00 PLAT) <r, S00'48'12 "E 309.92 MEAS. CL Mr' co r�o) N�a3 1.0 Lo S 223 25 283.45 ca oo m o , (j 1 ,rcc ;� o ,, b O (� o TRACT K �p ccv 00' 48' 12" �E °3n r • • in 87.22 • 1 DRIVE , Na N \ L3=15 53 03" In )R =240.00 ai 66.54 1 164.43 SUNRISE ' i '0 °o,o su,:R'SE DRIVE ;% `° T °TRACT J y 157.66 4. - N W ir" `...27.1;25S.83 00' o 8/ ° 12" 94.00 01 CDNi tea o `- 03 Co �/ 11)^ 1:0 r4 CO ao M UN�� V's 11M F- rn .6 'AV n 0 1 V-�° !V % 1' /' S, m 1 • ;� 3 9, " R. a �i 1 • 3 0 !� {- F N ▪ Q -,1.-i, W W -E 5 ' N Q O .1 pm. co 0 0 1'3) /�, m F'� ryryti ry�� 1 ia �o't N J < �°' N .R��,ryti is Ed d . 119.47 125.86 w�� SOO °30'3• E f 284.71 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (881) 881 -1914 FA)5/81 -9188 210 85th Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 (787) 787 -11180 F X783 -1553 W UNE OF LOT 1, — ' BLOCK 8, LEXINGTON v PARK LAKE VIEW .• LY EXTENSION OF LOT 11,v % S' BLOCK 8, LEXINGTON PARK LAKE VIEW —J Cif (.0 C) 33 ' o • • 0 m 0 i)i 1 1 N I r0 (2 33 33 (3I U1 CCI w 8 "j1 • CJI ,r) m z SW CORNER OF SEC. 19, 1 I TWP. 31, RGE. 22 (FOUND ANOKA CO. MON.) ."'. • 4 TRACT E C• CD �_ G) O O ) F 1_ c) ` E <fC 1 h7 O p_ UJ C] CJ W UJ U" s', 1.- LU P S LI S S_ CC `E 0 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS • • 1f ti ,,isUZW `NIS L'6/ .3 as jo au17 s� S 8'Nj L 0 vi 3 o• le Accepted and a ....9VE72 - -- s -gAnio -get d7 -3old ' e 001 S9OZZ 6fYres- c i S :+ N F 001 001 13N cur v'a° OEY ' 4 `b N At zrsl/ 189I/ u N as Ir91/1SSZI WW1 Z9SI/SYSZ1 15119 e 0.175* Y F F6SZ1 S8521 Fr51AT- 3CS1r ZPS7/ :arse ZR371!783Z/ ZPSZ%mL • —' H Les-170S Sx1 P!S ?1 61'81{ t rrszr,rrszI easy .arszi r,5' i kiZ ACV a 17571 '" Pa521 Prnn/ V ww7/ 68sdr 685Z/ 6rsz/ N 6852% �qa V! a h .1- u -. M N h s6 5U ,637/"617! M *CCZ/ t-6SZl 06W./4171 - to 1 -+4) f�'M • W W -4 Y1 er> eN ea H 5 h srs SFS 3)tt"7 9rsz/ 99$21 SrWZ/ RBSl/ irszl6t5& 685a caw' 683Z/ 6rszi ti m -- ∎ -. M N �p N,- a H M h la - to q se:, s% 0'637/ *6 SU b6'10/ CS I ,0'6 Sz/ 6637/ 163-lf *63Z/ 14637/ #-65v ti o i coo • 0 co Pi % o! rOc., "*`` -teeO�� 0 r 7 !.. 7, /. 7 7 171.90 ‹oe 0 m 125 3SI WIS 125.82 125.87 125.82 cr 125.88 125.82 IN) m on o ^ r m _.0 125.88 125.82 • 125.88 co — — 451.70 125.82 SA To' 125.88 125.83 M a N 90.88 125.83 w O N 01u °1 N 125.88 406' \■1 Xi • • \ 47. L. ��C; 'p TRACT J SUNRISE DRIVE -57‘ TRACT I '- TRACT H '527\ ! -I TRACT F 1- U 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET COUNTY ROAD N NORTH ROAD TRACT D lk S 0 1 4. , k -5. \ \ AII, \ I NO - \ ---- 1' - ' o \ V'k Z 11 \ ttJ V) v • • r- \ \ \ W LINE OF LOT PJ (f ) J ♦ A STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V.C. Paul Bengtson March 9, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING Rezone to GB (General Business) Conditional Use Permit to allow a PUD (Planned Unit Development) Development Stage Plan / Preliminary Plat Allocation of MUSA reserve Apollo Landing Equinox Development is proposing a 5 lot commercial subdivision on property located currently addressed as 540 Lilac Drive. The application submitted includes a Rezoning to GB (General Business), a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Planned Unit Development, a Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and allocation of MUSA reserve. The main occupant of the site will be an 80 room hotel proposed for Lot 1 of the Plat. The development also includes a restaurant pad on lot 5, and retail /commercial pads on lots 2, 3, and 4. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Vacant Commercial Rural North Single Family Residential Industrial Rural South Apollo Drive, Industrial Commercial General Business East Vacant Commercial Rural West Single Family Residential Cemetery Industrial Rural General Industrial The comprehensive plan guides the site for Commercial land use. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area and a portion is within the existing MUSA boundary. Public water and sanitary sewer are available within the Apollo Drive right -of -way. • 1 Apollo Landing, page 2 Planned Unit Development The proposed commercial center will include five lots on which multiple buildings will be potentially built. Since each lot will not have street frontage a Planned Unit Development is necessary. In the case of a commercial development the procedure for doing a Planned Unit Development is through a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant is proposing to rezone the site to GB (General Business); however through the Planned Unit Development those base standards can be modified. Within each of the following development standards topics, the proposed standards will be discussed along with the base GB (General Business) zoning district standards, and of course recommendations from staff. Setback Standards The proposed setbacks are more restrictive than the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore acceptable to staff. Staff has recommended to the applicant that the restaurant building on Lot 5 be moved closer to the main entry drive and therefore Apollo Drive, though it is not known at this time if that can be ccomplished. Buildings General Business Proposed Arterial Street 40 feet 105 Feet Side Yard 10 feet 30 feet Rear Yard 30 feet 40 feet The proposed setbacks are more restrictive than the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore acceptable to staff. Staff has recommended to the applicant that the restaurant building on Lot 5 be moved closer to the main entry drive and therefore Apollo Drive, though it is not known at this time if that can be ccomplished. The proposed setbacks for parking are equal to or more restrictive than the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore acceptable to staff. All signage will be required to be setback the typical 10 feet from right -of -way and 5 feet from any side or rear property line. Lot Sizes The Planned Unit Development allows deviation from strict provision of the zoning code related to lot area and width. Each lot is designed to accommodate a building pad and sufficient parking to serve the intended use of the lot. The proposed lot areas and widths are in conformance with the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore appropriate. • Parking Lot General Business Proposed Arterial Street 15 feet 83 feet Side Yard 10 feet 10 feet Rear Yard 10 feet 10 feet The proposed setbacks for parking are equal to or more restrictive than the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore acceptable to staff. All signage will be required to be setback the typical 10 feet from right -of -way and 5 feet from any side or rear property line. Lot Sizes The Planned Unit Development allows deviation from strict provision of the zoning code related to lot area and width. Each lot is designed to accommodate a building pad and sufficient parking to serve the intended use of the lot. The proposed lot areas and widths are in conformance with the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore appropriate. • Apollo Landing, page 3 •Bui1din Materials/ Elevations The elevation that was submitted with this application is strictly an artist's rendering of what a hotel built to the height standards of the zoning district, and to the commercial design standards of the city zoning code would look like. It is in no way an architectural elevation depicting exactly what will be built on site. The architectural elevations are intellectual property of the different hotel chains and since a specific user has not been tabbed to take the hotel location final architectural elevations are not available at this time. However, as a part of the Planned Unit Development rezoning request, architectural design standards must be established to dictate the aesthetics of the buildings eventually built on this site. The applicant has submitted some very basic architectural design guidelines in line with our minimal design standards from the zoning code. Staff is recommending that very specific architectural design standards be developed for the site, since the user and subsequent building design can not be confirmed at this time. The applicant is currently working with staff to try and develop these standards. Building Height Again, the final occupant of the hotel, and therefore the final design of that building can not be verified at this time. As such it is important that any approval of this project establish a firm height limitation. Staff would recommend the limitation normally associated with the GB (General Business) zoning district. According to the Zoning Ordinance, no building within the GB (General Business) Zoning District may exceed 45 feet in height. Landscaping IIP In accordance with the Screening requirements of the zoning ordinance screening is required along the boundary of the residential property adjacent to this institutional use. Either a green belt with 80% opacity, six feet in height must be provided, or alternatively a solid screening fence six feet in height. The plans as submitted provide a six -foot fence augmented with some additional landscaping. The remainder of the landscaping on site looks rather minimal, but that is based on the lack of definitive users and building size /layout for the site. As each site is designed with the final user the landscaping would be designed to work with the layout. However, again the architectural design standards would be able to spell out the types of allowable plant materials. This would create the cohesiveness desired. Staff would prefer to see further details on the landscaping of the main access drive since that will not change, and the hotel pad site which should only need minor adjustments once a user is found. Staff is asking the applicant to look into the elimination of some parking spaces within the large parking area for lots 2, 3, and 4. This would allow for additional landscaping fingers, which could be clearly defined for landscaping at this time. Green Area The GB (General Business) zoning district requires that impervious surface coverage not exceed 75 %. The submitted plans currently show the property at approximately 70.5% impervious surface coverage, well within the limitations of the zoning district. If parking is eliminated as is mentioned in the parking section of this "'report, the impervious surface coverage would naturally decrease. Apollo Landing, page 4 •Parking The parking for each use can be broken down as follows: Hotel: Number of Rooms Number of Employees Code Requirement Spaces Required Spaces Provided 80 rooms 10 One parking space for each room, one parking space for every ten rooms, and one parking space for each employee on the maximum work shift. 98 100 Restaurant: Dining Room Number of Employees Code Requirement Spaces Required Spaces Provided 5,400 square feet (85% of the building footprint) 11 Ten spaces for each 1,000 square feet of dining room, plus one space for each employee on the maximum work shift. 71 54 On site 17 Shared Retail /Commercial: • Building Square Footage Code Requirement Spaces Required Spaces Provided 34,080 square feet At least one off street parking space for each 200 square feet of floor area 170 186 Entire Site: Use Required Provided Hotel 98 100 Restaurant 71 71 Retail /Commercial 170 186 Total 339 357 There is actually an abundance of parking on the site. Originally the applicant was proposing to use some parking spaces for trash enclosures, though staff is recommending that trash storage be seamlessly integrated into the designs of the building. The Environmental Board has suggested the elimination of some parking spaces in favor of increased landscaping, which is a definite possibility. Staff would suggest that the elimination of parking spaces occur in the middle of the sea of parking for lots 2, 3, and 4 to add landscaping fingers and break up the monotonous pavement. The applicant has displayed a willingness to accommodate additional landscape fingers with the understanding that eliminating excess parking will limit the future tenant mix of the center. However, staff is developing an analysis of the peak parking demand for each use on the site to determine the true parking need for the entire site. • Apollo Landing, page 5 Access /Circulation Access to the site is via an entry /exit driveway directly from Apollo Drive. As indicated in the City Engineer's memorandum, approval for this access must be obtained from Anoka County. The applicant has submitted a separate application to Anoka County; however comments have not been made available at the time of this report. Lighting The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is incomplete; at this point it only depicts the entry drive lighting and the lighting for the hotel property. As the setback for the hotel will be matched by the other buildings on site, it can be deduced that the lighting plan can be made to comply for the entire site. Staff is still asking that the plan be redone to incorporate all of the lighting on site known at this time, such as the parking lot lighting and the lighting on the buildings as shown on the site plan. The applicant has submitted some cut - sheets for lighting fixtures. This is a good start, however staff has requested that the applicant include very specific details about the types of lighting fixtures in the architectural design standards for the site. This will eliminate any questions in regards to the lighting, and keep a uniform look to the site no matter when each lot is developed. Signage As the applicant is proposing multi- tenant buildings, and the architectural design standards for the site are •esigned to create a cohesive design throughout the entire commercial center, city staff has asked the applicant to create a sign plan for the entire site that will clearly define the types, location, and allotment of signs within the center. This plan has yet to be submitted at this time. Trash / Mechanical Equipment The site plans submitted with this application do not clearly depict a location for trash enclosures, or the location of mechanical equipment. However, in meetings held between city staff and the developer, the developer agreed to include specific language within the architectural design standards that would address both issues. Trash enclosures will be required to be built into the buildings with roll up (garage) doors for access. This will eliminate the need for the accessory trash enclosures that detract from the aesthetics of the entire site. Mechanical equipment will need to be completely screened from the view of the right of way and the neighboring properties. The six foot high fence proposed around the majority of the property should do this rather effectively, with the exception of the view from Apollo Drive. All mechanical equipment and utility boxes located on the ground should be placed to be visible only from within the center, or should be effectively screened by either screen walls or appropriate landscaping materials. All roof mounted mechanical equipment should be architecturally screened by the roof structure or parapet walls. This will need to be included in the architectural design standards developed for the site. • Apollo Landing, page 6 U� Water and Sanitary sewer service are available within the Apollo Drive right -of -way. The submitted utility plans depict an existing tie in to the Apollo Drive trunk that ends at the corner of the neighboring property to the east. Further staff investigation is underway to either confirm or deny its existence. If it does not exist the Developer will have to adjust the layout of the utilities to keep them entirely on his own property, unless appropriate easements are granted by the neighboring property owner. Stormwater management The City Engineer has reviewed the submitted grading and drainage plan, and his memorandum is attached to this report. The plan is subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. The city hasn't received any comments from the Rice Creek Watershed District at this point. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the February 23, 2005 regular meeting. There recommendations were numerous and are attached to this report. OPTIONS Ili1. Continue the public hearing. 2. Deny the project. 3. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends continuing the public hearing. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Applicant's Narrative received January 10, 2005. 2. Lighting Plan and Cut Sheets received February 28, 2005. 3. City Engineer's memorandum dated March 4, 2005. 4. Environmental Board memorandum from February 23, 2005 meeting. 5. Elevation received January 10, 2005. 6. Apollo Landing Plan Set received January 10, 2005. Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 7671 Central Ave. N.E. • Fridley, Minnesota 55432 • (763) 783 -0300 December 4, 2004 City of Lino Lakes C /OJeftSmyser 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Project Narrative Apollo Landing. Lino Lakes. MN For: Equinox Development. LI.P 425 Arrowhead Drive, Suite E Lino Lakes. MN 55014 Dear Mr. Smyser: We are respectfully requesting the following approvals: 1. Rezoning from Rural to General Business (GB). 2. Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a Planned Commercial Development. 3. Preliminary plat of "Apollo Landing" for the 8.009 -acre subject property for a five lot commercial subdivision. 4. Site plan approval for related site improvements that is consistent with the General Business zoning district standards. PROECT DESCRIPTION The proposed development consists of five separate buildings. with related uses that comply with those permitted under the GB Zoning requirements, clustered on an 8.01 acre site within the commercial district defined in the City Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the I- 35'Lake Drive interchange area. A compatible architectural theme for the individl'al buildings will tie them together as a unified development. Each portion of the development has enough parking to support its proposed use as required by the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. By jointly developing the access. circulation. stormwater ponding and utility design for the related uses, we can more efficiently utilize the site, which will allow upgrading of select elements, resulting in an upscale image that is consistent with the property and relates to the surrounding land uses. The proposed development does not have any conflicts with other applicable provisions of the City Code and is of sufficient size. composition, and layout that its construction, marketing and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence on any subsequent development. The planned unit development will not have an undue or adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment ofnei2hborhood property and will be Land Surveying • ('iri/ Engineering • Municipal IIti•rlrulu,•v • Haler Resources s • R 'icicnticr/ Commercial Development • compatible with the surrounding land uses. A preliminary wetland investigation of the property determined that there are no jurisdictional wetlands. This was reviewed and confirmed by Marty Asleson, the City of Lino Lakes Environmental Specialist. SUBMITTAL PACKAGE Attached you will find plans which include the following, which were prepared by our office: 1. Existing Conditions Plan 2. Site Plan 3. Preliminary Plat, Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan In addition, you will receive building elevations of the proposed hotel. Design standards for building construction in the PUD are discussed in this letter. REZONING The proposed rezoning from Rural to General Business is consistent with the City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT • The PUD process provides for a joint planning /design effort by developers and City officials rather than the City establishing maximum limits within which developers may perform. It is not the intent to allow for reductions or waivers to standard zoning requirements solely for the purpose of increasing overall density or allowing development that otherwise could not be approved The PUD process encourages the following: 1. Flexibility in land development and redevelopment in order to utilize new techniques of building, design, construction and land development. Approval of this development will allow for the redevelopment of a single family farmstead with restricted access into a viable commercial development with a combined access. 2. Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs' and siting and the clustering of buildings and land uses. By allowing the PUD approach, efficiencies will be utilized in the delivery of public services and combined stormwater ponding, reducing the amount of infrastructure required and also provide an ancillary benefit of higher energy efficiency, thereby resulting in overall reduced energy costs for the users of this commercial neighborhood. This provides for the opportunity to enhance other elements such as beautifully landscaped parkway. • • • 3. Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including but not limited to steep slopes, trees and poor soils. The design flexibility allowed under the PUD provisions will be utilized wherever possible to preserve as many desirable trees as physically possible while allowing for an appropriate level of development. 4. More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities trough miring of land uses. There is no mixing of land uses in this development, however, the efficient use of land in creating this development results in the creation of common open space that benefits all of the users of this commercial neighborhood and the surrounding land uses. 5. High quality of design, and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned By reducing the site improvement costs. the developer is able to put additional detailing in the buildings, and more extensive landscaping to create a higher quality development by improved design methods. thereby having a positive effect on land values for the surrounding properties. 6. Use of traffic management and design techniques to reduce the potential for traffic conflicts. Improvements to area roads and intersections may be required as appropriate. The scale of this development and the location on Apollo Drive requires a combined access for traffic safety reasons. The PUD provisions facilitate the creation of the combined access with it's streetscape tree plantings will provide for proven methods of traffic calming and reduce the traffic speed and result in an increase in traffic safety for users of this site. SITE DESIGN SITE LAYOUT DESIGN The site has been successfully laid out to accommodate the proposed commercial land uses. Each site is fully accessible to the centrally located site main entrance drive and has been properly engineered and sized to accommodate emergency and service vehicle access for the site. The building size, setbacks, and landscaping for the proposed development fall within the regulations outlined in the Planned Unit Development (PUD) section of the • City ordinances and meet the intent of the underlying GB General Business Zoning District. • VEHICULAR CIRCULATION Access onto Apollo Drive is restricted, and this proposed access is consistent with the City's plans for this portion of Apollo Drive. A logical vehicular circulation pattem has been created within the proposed site, which allows vehicle traffic to enter and exit the site efficiently using the clearly defined main entrance drive. SITE DATA LAND USE GUIDE PLAN Existing: Commercial ZONING Existing: Rural Proposed: General Business SI I L AREA CALCULATIONS Lot Area Minimum Required (GB): 20,000 SF Proposed: 20.000 SF Lot Width Minimum Required (GB): Proposed: Existing Pervious/Impervious Areas Impervious area: Pervious area: Total Area: Proposed Pervious/Impervious Areas: Pervious Area Required Minimum: Proposed Perimeter Areas Hotel Landscaping Islands and peninsulas Impervious Area: Maximum Allowed 100 FT 100 FT 8,389 SF (0.19 Acres) 2.4% 340,494 SF (7.82 Acres) 97.6% 348,883 SF (8.01 Acres) 100% 87,221 SF (2.00 Acres) 25.0% 102,950 SF (2.36 Acres) 29.5% 88,150 SF (2.02 Acres) 25.3% 3,800 SF (0.09 Acres) 1.0% 11,000 SF (0.25 Acres) 3.2% 261.662 SF (6.01 Acres) 75.0% • • Proposed: 245,933 SF (5.65 Acres) 70.5% Building Pad Areas: 57,886 SF (1.33 Acres) 16.6% Total Area 348,883 SF (8.01 Acres) 100% SE 'I BACK DATA Proposed: Front Yard: Building: Local Street: 30 Feet Collector or Arterial Street: 40 Feet Parking: 15 Feet Side Yard: Building: 30 Feet Parking: 10 Feet Rear Yard: Building: 30 Feet Parking: 10 Feet PROPOSED BUILDING DATA Hotel (80 Units): Parking Required: 98 Spaces Proposed: 100 Spaces 16,656 Square Feet Retail/Office /Commercial: 34,080 Square Feet Parking Required: 153 Spaces Proposed: 186 Spaces Restaurant: 6,750 Square Feet Parking Required: 71 Spaces Proposed: 54 Spaces +17 shared above Maximum Structure Height: 45 Feet STORMWATER MANAGEMENT In the southwest corner of this site is a ponding, drainage and utility easement that contains an existing stormwater detention pond and room for future enlargement of the pond. The existing pond was constructed to manage stormwater runoff from a total of 15.2 acres of drainage area including part of Apollo Drive and the easterly part of this site. Future expansion of this pond will manage runoff from an additional 12.0 acres of drainage area from the northwest, including the westerly part of this site. The sizing of this pond was computed by the City's consultant SEH in 1998. This sizing anticipated that projects in the ultimate drainage area would be developed with up to 75% impervious area. In this project, the storm water pond will be enlarged to full design capacity, as sized by SEH. It will then be able to manage stormwater runoff of a total of 27.2 acres of drainage area, including the entire area of this site, under ultimate development conditions. This includes the five buildings, their associated parking lots, and the main access drive through the site. UTILITY DESIGN Watermain and sanitary sewer lines are being extended from Apollo Drive into the site and have been sized to conform to the City of Lino Lakes standards. Three fire hydrants will be dispersed throughout the site to provide proper fire protection for all of the proposed buildings. Small utilities (gas, electric, phone and cable) will be extended into the site via joint trenching and coordinated with the various small utility vendors. LANDSCAPING AND AESTHETICS Entry into the site will be facilitated by a large Pylon sign at the entrance, listing the businesses within. Upon tuming into the site, a user will be visually lead down the tree -lined main drive 41/ to the 4 -story hotel at the temiinus. Off to the left will be a restaurant overlooking the pond. while off to the right will be a cluster of 3 office/commerciaUretail /specialty_ school/service buildings. General site landscaping will include screening at property lines with plantings and fencing for security and privacy separation. Individual buildings and their respective parking areas will be landscaped on an individual basis with sprinkled planting beds. BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS The design features of the individual buildings will include a select variety of design materials which will feature of a combination of natural earth tones with appropriate accent colors, together in a very distinct handsome architectural style that is in scale with the site and the surrounding land uses. An Apollo Landing Architectural Review Committee will be established and will be empowered with a review authority through restrictive covenants on the individi La1 properties to insure compliance with the proposed commercial neighborhood architectural design theme. All proposed buildings will be required to create a pedestrian friendly streetscape image. Limitations will be created for detached accessory structures. • Building massing for all individual buildings and for the arrangement on the site will combine with landscape elements to highlight entry and sequence. Each building's exterior elevation will work within the time honored aesthetic vocabulary of 3 part composition. A base, middle, and top will each be articulated to give clarity to the buildings as well as tie all elements of the site together in a simple cohesive composition. In addition, each building will have 3- dimensional offsets in order to break down its massing. Color and texture will be used to denote these differences. Common materials will tie the complex together. These materials will primarily be EIFS/Dryvit or equal; CMU Classic Block; Timberline dimensional shingles and/or Majestic Slate tile roofing; Color Klad prefinished metal; wood; stone; HardiBoard cement fiber panels and trim; and porcelain tile accents. PROJECT CONTACTS OWNER/DEVELOPER Craig Piene, Philip Carlson Equinox Development. LLP 425 Arrowhead Drive, Suite E Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Phone:(65 1)490 -1190 Fax:(651)917 -9482 ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR TeddW. Matzke • Matzke Surveying & Engineering. Inc. 7671 Central Avenue NE Fridley, MVLN 55432 Phone 763 -783 -0300 Fax:763- 783 -0300 The attached documents and supporting facts should give City Staff the ability to review the proposed project and provide comments to the Owners for response prior to Environmental Board, Planning Commission, and City Council review of the planned unit development, preliminary plat, and site plan. If you have any questions or require additional information, please give me a call. Sincerely Tedd W. Matzke, PE, LS • RUUD LIGHTING 12 DI 3.1 35 3.3 30 03 30 33 2 5.3 • %.6 '3.0 '3., 3.4 '3.3 '0.6 '3.5 '2, 1.1 •0.5 1.0 1.7 .3.2 .3.1 1.3 •.3 1.0 '3.0 .0.0 •.3 1.3 3.0 1.3 •.3 1.3 1.3 •.7 1.0 1.3 '3., 1.3 7.6 '3.1 3.3 3.1 1.6 3 .4427.3 '2.1 1. '2.3 1.2 1.6 1.6 '3.3 1.0 1.1 .0.2 1.0 .0.7 1. 1, 1, '3.1 31 1.5 •. 3.3 •.1 3.1 1. 1.4 3.3 '3. 3, 1.1 .3.3 1.1 .1.4 1.1 .0. 1.0 .0.2 .3.5 .1. 1.1 1.5 -3. 1.3 '0.2 1.7 1..43.7 1.5 .3. .0.3 3.2 .0.7 17: 1.4 1.7 .3. •.3 '0.2 .0.5 1. /..0 .0.1 1.3 .7. '3.0 1.3 1.1 o.s ZCA L SEA .3.5 1.3 .3.b_74,3 1.7 .3.3 .0.0 '3.0 1.3 1.3 .3.3 .3.0 .3.D 1.0 .3.0 1.3 1.3 '0.0 1.3 .3.0 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.3 .2.1 '3.5 1.2 1.3 .354 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 '3.3 1.3 3.3 '3, 1.0 "3.3 1.0 1.0 3.3 1.0 '0.1 1.3 '3. '0.3 2 '3.5 .3.0 1.4 .1. .1 '3.4 1.2 1.0 '5.0 1.3 3.3 '3.3 1.3 13.3 3.0 1, 1.3 1.0 3.3 '3.3 '3.0 3.3 1., 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.2 "3.0 '3.0 1.0 1.3 1, 1.0 1.0 1, '0.3 1.0 '3.3 '3.3 3.3 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.: 1.3 1.4 3.4 3.1 3.0 1.2 3.3 1.3 1.3 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.3 3.3 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.3 3.) 3.7 2 3.2 1.1 '3.0 3.3 '3.3 1.3 3.3 1.0 3, 3.0 '0.0 '0.0 3.0 3.0 '0.3 1.3 1. , 1.0 1.5 1.1 .3.7 .0.4 1.1 .0.3 '0.3 .3.0 .3.3 1.0 .3.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 .0.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 .3.1 .3.0 .3 1.0 .1.5 .2.3 .2 '1.5 /.3 .7.7 .0 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.2 .0 1.5 '1.5 3.1 '2.3 1.2 1.3 .1 .1.3 1.7 .7.5 .1.2 1.6 1.1 '3.5 .3.3 1.1 .3.0 .0.0 1.3 1.3 1.0 3.0 1.3 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.) 1, 3.3 1.1 'DA 3.3 1.3 1, 3, '3.3 1.3 "3.3 1.3 '3.3 .3.0 '3.7 .3.0 1.1 '3.3 '3.1 1.3 'a, 1.0 3.0 1.0 '3.3 1.3 .0.1 1.0 73.0 / . 1.7 3.2 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 '0.3 1.3 -3.1 .3.3 1.5 1.2 .0.0 1.0 '3.0 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.0 77.3 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.1 .0.7 1.3 .3.3 1, '3.0 1.5 1.0 .3. / 1.2 3, 1.7 2.2 1.6 1.6 '.6 3.6 3.4 1.4 1.3 1.5 3.3 1.2 1.4 1.5 .5 3.5 3.4 3.4 -.3.1 3.3 3.5 .5 3.5 4.2 3.1 3.1 3.3 '3.1 '2.4 3.3 1.0 1.1 0.1 '0.1 .0.1 1.1 1.1 .3.1 "3.3 .1 '3.1 3.1 .3.1 .0.1 .3.3 .0.0 1.2 3.0 3.0 1.0 '3.0 3.3 1.0 '3.3 '3.3 '3.0 '3.0 3.3 3.0 '3.0 3.3 3.3 '3.0 1.3 '3.0 '1.3 PR2640-M DE RIMMED YOUNTEM MEd, TT 6 nrnmEn rex anG. DOM.-ES SE• /WW1. YOUNTED 11BDUT SEEDA-DDIENAILT ANGLE:0 DECREED ECOIDONAL EGUIDUENT ru4E:sc, DICADO CC. X .125,CALL Pot.. ID 4,1 SUSTAINED WitiOsW T1 LPEPPIED MOMENT 1.6mInalro Stluskile '1.1 1.3 1.9 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 .0.1 1 1.3 '3.3 3.1 1.1 '3.2 1.4 1.3 '0.0 1.0 1.3 '3.1 .0.4 1. 1.3 '3.0 1.3 '3, 1.1 1.4 '3.6 '3.5 3.1 1.0 3.3 1.3 '3.0 3.0 1.: .1.7 •.5 1.1 .0.3 '0.3 '3.0 '3.3 1.: '5.2 '3.1 'a . 0 1. 'o. . '3.4 1.6 .2.3 1.4 '1.0 .6 0.1 3.3 1.6 1.3 .3 .0.3 '3.3 1.3 .3.3 1.1 '3.2 '3.4 4 7.2 1. .3.4 1.1 /3 1.5 1.3 1.0 3, "3.0 3.3 3, 3.3 3.1 3.1 /.2 .3.7 1. .1.3 .2.5 .1.5 1.1 1.3 .3.0 .3.0 1.3 '3.0 '0.3 3.0 1.3 3.1 1.2 1.6 1.5 .3.5 1.0 '.0 .3.1 .3.1 3.3 1. 'b. 1.3 1.3 '3.3 3.3 1.0 1.3 .3.0 "3.3 '3, 3.3 '3.1 1.4 .3.7 .3.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.1 3.2 3.3 1.3 1.0 3.3 '3.3 '3.0 "3.0 '3.0 1.3 3.3 '0.3 1.3 3.1 3.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 3.3 1.3 3.3 3.3 'b., 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 3.3 3.3 1.3 '0.3 3, '3.0 1, 'a, '3.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 '3.0 1.0 'a, "3.3 1.0 '3, '3.3 .3.3 .0.3 /.3 1.3 "3 1.3 3 . 3 . 1. '3.3 "3 . '3. 0 'o. 3 . 3 1, 3.3 1.3 1, 3.3 .3.3 3.0 '3.3 1.0 3 1.3 1.3 '3.0 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.0 '0.3 '3.0 3, 1.0 '3.3 1.3 '3.0 '3.3 1.3 '0.0 1.3 3.3 3.3 1.3 1.3 '3.3 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.7 1.0 3, '3.3 3.0 1.3 1, '3.3 '3.3 1.3 1. 3 . 3 1.3 '3.3 '3.3 1. '0.0 '3.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 3, 3.3 '3.0 3.3 3.0 '3, 1.0 1.3 '3.0 3.0 '3.3 1.3 1.3 '3.3 '3.0 SE4410-D 100 W MB "FRONT" " SIDE " ED.CD,D ■Avubd 05 Le. 166 656.63 DODO DITEDUALIA00,7 MEDI Fr /5' ..„, 4' ' '1""":-S E V FEB 2 8 2005 snEscatAADTEDICCOACMDEIMD C TY OF LINO LAKES AREELD1261•61711677711126.16667,12.7611617911•66166 RUUD LIGHTING 8002167000 DEA aouncruudletning Dort. BOO 473.1.CAN CuluDDIEDDSI bust I. ACE I LaToLt Elm vinvrai IADAAAE. DOSPAIMOCIN t511.1',422:1"66===.4.1 FOOTGANDLED CALCULATED AT GRADE LC:. MEAN LuIRDS • SQUARE WALL MOUNT 12" (305 mm) PROJECTION CUTOFF Ballast Sealing Gasket Housing Finish color: bronze Lampholder Capacitor — 0.25" (6 mm) 3.1" 79 mm) — Silicone Gasket Lens Spring -Clip Assembly Hidden from view Lamp (Included) 5 "(127 mm) Reflector Prefinished semi - specular aluminum ❑12 "(305mm) BOTTOM VIEW SPEC* A °slr TI WATTAGE CATALOG # METAL HALIDE El SPEC # Wall Downlight 70W MH SE4407- (a)(b) SPEC # Wall Downlight 100W MH SE4410- (a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SPEC # Wall Downlight 70W HPS SE4507- (a)(b) ri SPEC # Wall Downlight 100W HPS SE4510- (a)(b) FLUORESCENT SPEC # Any 26W FL SE4226- (a)(b) SPEC # Any 32W FL SE4232- (a)(b) OHSPEC # Any 42W FL SE4242- (a)(b) SPEC # Any 57W FL SE4257- (a)(b) Specify (a) Voltage & (b) Options. • GENERAL DESCRIPTION Aluminum die -cast housing supplied. Knockouts are provided on the back of the housing for 1/2" conduit entry or for mounting over a single gang box, 4" square or 4" octagon boxes. Two #8 x 1" threaded studs and nuts are provided for mounting over a junction box. Housing also includes 1/2 " -14 NPT threaded hubs on four sides for conduit entry. Closed cell neoprene sponge gasketing on the back of the housing provides a watertight mounting seal. Silicone sponge cord gasket between housing and lens ensures a water- and insect -tight seal, Injection molded clear polycarbonate lens and shroud assembly is held in place using a hidden spring clip assembly. Semi - specular reflector directs light downward to wash the wall below and to the sides of fixture. Reflector projects light out and away from fixture. 1/2 " -14 NPT Threaded Hub — Polycarbonate Lens 1/2 "-14 NPT Threaded Hub Bronze Polycarbonate Shroud (a) VOLTAGE SUFFIX KEY D 120/277V (Standard: 70 & 100W MI-I) M 120/208/240/277V (Standard: 100W HPS) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (70 & 100W MH; 100W HPS) 1 120V (26W FL Only) (Magnetic Ballast) 2 277V (26W FL Only) (Magnetic Ballast) 3 208V 4 240V 6L 347V (26 — 57W FL) (Canada Only) UL 120 — 277V Universal Voltage (Standard: 26 — 57W FL) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin TD -9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authorized International Distributor. ELECTRICAL Fluorescent fixture includes a 26W twin (quad) tube, 32, 42 or 57W triple tube, compact fluorescent lamp. HID fixtures include a clear, medium -base lamp and porcelain enclosed, 4kv- rated screw - shell -type lampholder with spring - loaded center contact. Lamp ignitor included where required. HID and FL electronic ballast assemblies are high -power factor, FL magnetic are normal power factor and use the following circuit types: Reactor(120V HPS) 70 & 100W HPS HX — High Reactance 70 & 100W MH; 100W HPS Preheat – Magnetic (minimum starting temperature 32 °F [0 °C]) 26W FL Electronic (120 – 277V Universal Voltage & 347V) (minimum starting temperature 0 °F [- 18 °C]) 26 – 57W FL 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 Notes (b) OPTIONS (factory-installed) -(a)F J Tamperproof Lens Fasteners Fusing -(a)P Photocell O Quartz Standby (includes 100W quartz lamp) (N /A on 277V Reactor) Specify (a) Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key FEB 2 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES LABELS ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in the US and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP54 per IEC 529 and IES 598. FINISH Housing is standard with our exclusive DeltaGuard® finish, featuring an E -coat epoxy primer with bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven -year limited warranty. ACCESSORIES TPS -1 Tamperproof Screwdriver FAX (262) 884-3309 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com 01/08/04 RUUD LIGHTING • 6" EXTENDED POLE MOUNT W (406 mm) PARKING /ROADWAY LIGHT • • • Ballast Capacitor Ignitor (Where 6" (152 mm) required) (� – Housing Seamless, die -cast aluminum Finish color: bronze 016" (406 mm) Reflector Hydroformed aluminum with brightened and anodized finish Cord 24" (610 mm) long Extended Pole Mount Finish color: bronze 0 SPEC # SPEC# SPEC# SPEC# SPEC # SPEC # SPEC # SPEC # SPEC Pt SPEC, Specify (a) PULSE START METAL HALIDE 200W PSMH PR2620- (a)(b) 250W PSMH PR2625- (a)(b) 320W PSMH PR2632- (a)(b) 350W PSMH PR2635- (a)(b) 400W PSMH PR2640- (a)(b) METAL HALIDE 175W MH PR2417- (a)(b) 250W MH PR2425- (a)(b) 400W MH PR2440- (a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 250W HPS PR2525- (a)(b) 400W HPS PR2540- (a)(b) Voltage & (b) Options. Ballast Compartment Cover Patented Hinge Assembly 6.5" (165 mm) Lamp (Included) Lampholder Lens Frame Die -cast aluminum door frame secures lens; sealed with silicone gasket Finish color: black Parking lot and roadway luminaire for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Supplied with IES Type III (250W MH is field adjustable to Type II) optical system. Housing is seamless, die -cast alumi- num. Mounting consists of a 1.8" (44 mm) wide by 4.5" (114 mm) high by 6" -(152 mm) long extruded aluminum arm. The arm is held in place with two 3/8" (9 mm) mounting rods fastened to a steel backing plate inside the pole, and by two nuts inside the fixture housing. Mounting rods are provided with sealing washers to prevent water leakage. Lens assembly consists of rigid aluminum frame and high - impact, clear- tempered glass. 114 120/208/240/2771 / (Standard) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (Standard) 1 120V 2 277V 27 277V Reactor (PSMH Only) 3 208V 4 240V 5 480V 6 347V (Canada Only) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin T0-9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authorized International Distributor. Fixture includes clear, mogul -base lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv -rated screw - shell -type lmpholder with spring - loaded center contact. Lamp ignitor included where required. All ballast assemblies are high -power factor and use the following circuit type: Reactor (277V PSMH) 200 – 400W PSMH CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 200 – 400W PSMH; 175 – 400W MH; 250 – 400W HPS ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in US and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP65 per IEC 529 and IEC 598. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 Notes y -11 alle -(a)F -(a)P -5P External Photocell (for 480V) Fusing Button Photocell 0 Quartz Standby (includes 100W quartz lamp) (N /A on 277V Reactor) Specify (a) Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key c FEB 2 8 2005 C "sf OF \,c, LAKES Exclusive DeltaGuard® finish features an E -coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven - year limited warranty. US 4,689,729 FWG -16 Wire Guard SBL -16 Backlight Shield FAX (262) 884-3309 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com 12/11/03 RUUD LIGHTING R Etc FEB 2 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES) ir RA 'INN 6" EXTENDED POLE MOUNT 116' (406 ) PARK G RO DW Y LIGHT Isofootcandle plots show initial footcandles at grade. (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) 0.95 for single fixture with 0° tilt (Consult factory for EPA rating on multiple units). 150° 120° WNW lillff Nile_ or eri.`r �� a kaP071 LW 414 I 4410.,,), 0000 30• .20000t 30° '. 150° 120 Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 10473 Candlepower distribution curve of 400W MH Parking/Roadway Light 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100 30.5 100 30.5 80' __ ___- °- . 24.4 80' -__- -_ - -- - - -- 24.4 60' -- -- 1 - -_ _ 18.3 60' __ _- '1 - -- -- - -- 18.3 40' - __ -_ . 12.2 40' __ ____ a _. -__ -_- 12.2 0' - Om 0 - - _ Om 20' __. - __ _ 6.1 20' __. __._. __ 6.1 40' - 12.2 40' -- -- - - -- 12.2 60' -- - - -_ ..._ -.18.3 60 __... _. __ 18.3 80' 24.4 80 24.4 100' 30 5 100' 30 5 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 0 m 6.1 122 183 24.4 30.5 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 0 m 6.1 122 183 24.4 30.5 Isofootcandle plot of 250W MH Parking/Roadway Light at 25' (7.6 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) Isofootcandle plot of 400W MH Parking/Roadway Light at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100' 30.5 100 30.5 80' 24.4 80' 24.4 60'- -- 18.3 60' \ 18.3 40' -. -. -- - 12.2 40' _ __ -- - - - -- -5 __._ __ -_ 12.2 0 - - -_. __ i _' _- D .1 0' - - 0 m 40' - - -- __ -- - - -- 12.2 40' - - -.. _. - -- -- -- -..... 12.2 60 18.3 60' _ --- ___ _-- ___ -___. -- 18.3 80' 24.4 80' 24 4 100' 30.5 100' 30 5 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 0 m 6.1 122 183 244 30.5 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 0 m 6.1 122 183 24.4 30.5 Lighting Sciences Inc. Isofootcandle plot of 250W HPS Certified Test Report No. LSI 4941 Parking/Roadway Light at 25' (7.6 m) Candlepower distribution curve of 400W HPS a .wuntine.beiGh .B_ e°Asectical tilt Parking/Roadway Light Pole- spacing Example Data Isofootcandle plot of 400W HPS Parking/Roadway Light at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) Test area is centered within a (16) pole layout. Max. Recommended Pole- spacing Catalog # Lamp Type Lamp Lumens Mounting Height X x Y Footcandles Lux PR2417 -M 175W MH 12,000 15' (4.6 m) 90' (27.4 m) x 60' (18.3 m) 3.97 43 20' (6.1 m) 120' (36.6 m) x 80' (24.4 m) 2.15 23 PR2425 -M 250W MH 20,000 20' (6.1 m) 120' (36.6 m) x 80' (24.4 m) 3.60 39 25' (7.6 m) 150' (45.7 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 2.22 24 PR2440 -M 400W MH 32,000 25' (7.6 m) 150' (45.7 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 3.56 38 30' (9.1 m) 180' (54.9 m) x 120' (36.6 m) 2.41 26 PR2525 -M 250W HPS 28,500 20' (6.1 m) 120' (35.6 m) x 80' (24.4 m) 4.94 53 25' (7.6 m) 180' (54.9 m) x 120' (36.6 m) 3.08 33 PR2540 -M 400W HPS 50,000 25' (7.6 m) 150' (45.7 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 5.41 58 30' (9.1 m) 180' (54.9 m) x 120' (36.6 m) 3.67 40 Average Initial Light Levels at Grade 2 Fixtures per pole @ 180° (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) 41!RUUD LIGHTIN 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 FAX (262) 884 -3309 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com 12/11/03 • ' STEEL CRO N@ E TM POLES • • • Square, non- tapered pole Carbon steel base plate Square Steel Poles 12" (305 mm) 1 1 Two-piece steel otG. base plate cover Pole cap (Supplied if tenon is riot used) 2 "x 6" (51 turn x152mm) Hand hole Hand -hole cover Slotted anchor bolt hole H fit) x W (in) x Wall (in) I SPEC 4 PS3S10C(a)BZ 10 x 3 x 0.125 Q SPEC # PS3S15C(a)BZ 15 x 3 x 0.125 SPEC 4 PS3S19C(a)BZ 19 x 3 x 0.125 Q SPEC 4 PS4S10C(a)BZ 10 x 4 x 0.125 u SPEC 4 PS4S15C(a)BZ 15 x 4 x 0.125 [a SPEC r PS4S19C(a)BZ 19 x 4 x 0.125 E SPEC 4 PS4S22C(a)BZ 22 x 4 x 0.125 SPEC 4 PS4S25C(a)BZ 25 x 4 x 0.125 SPEC 4 PS4S25S(a)BZ 25 x 4 x 0.188 SPEC # PS4S27C(a)BZ 27 x 4 x 0.125 r SPEC # PS4S30S(a)BZ 30 x 4 x 0.188 Q SPEC 4 PS5S25S(a)BZ 25 x 5 x 0.188 E SPEC # PS5S30S(a)BZ 30 x 5 x 0.188 0� SPEC 4 PS6S30S(a)BZ 30 x 6 x 0.188 x 9g— —�� SPEC # configuration. !� SPEC 4 RAL DESCRIPTION Non - tapered steel poles are supplied with welded base with cover, four galvanized anchor bolts, masonite mounting template and a pole cap (except tenon mount). Each bolt is provided with two washers and two nuts. Steel pole base has slotted holes. Per National Electrical Code requirements, pole is standard with a 2" x 6" (51 x 152 mm) hand hole, located 12" (305 mm) above bottom of pole base. A #10 -32 stainless - steel weld stud with grounding lug is located inside pole, opposite hand hole; a hand hole cover is supplied but shipped separately. For EPA ratings, see 'Windloading" sheet. US 5,820,255; 6,640,517 H (m) x W (mm) x Wall (mm) 3.0x76x3 4.6x76x3 5.8 x 76 x 3 3.0 x 102 x 3 4.6x102x3 5.8x102x3 6.7x102 x3 7.6x102 x3 7.6x102 x5 8.2x102 x3 9.1 x 102 x 5 7.6x127x5 9.1 x 127 x5 9.1 x152x5 Notes a) PO CON MUMTION 1 -I Single (direct mount) 5 • Triple (direct mount) 2 M Twin @ 180 °direct mount) 6 Quad (direct mount) 3 Twin @ 90° (direct mount" T Tenon (order tenon separately) For fixtures with fixed 20° mount, add prefix 2 to configuration numbers: i.e. 21, 22, 23, 25 and 26. MIMS; Square, non - tapered pole of structural steel tubing (ASTM A 500); with a minimum yield strength of 46,000 p.s.i. Welded to a formed carbon steel base plate with a minimum yield strength of 36,000 p.s.i. Exclusive DeltaGuard® finish features an E -coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven -year limited warranty. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 REC FEB 2 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES LABE Ruud Lighting square poles meet or exceed National Electrical Code Requirements. In the US, Ruud square poles are classified by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. for electrical ground bonding; in Canada, they are CSA certified for electrical ground bonding and structural strength. SSORY Catalog # REC -GFIBZ (120V) Wet Listed In -use cover FAX (262) 884 -3309 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com 9/1/04 GFI Outlet Accessory RUUD LIGHTING STEEL CRO WELDTM POLES 3S10C(a)BZ 10' (3.0 m) x 3" (76 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125° (3 mm) Base plate - 10° (254 mm) square x 0.50° (13 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4 " -10 x 18" (457 mm) + 3° (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10° (254 mm) 9.3' - 11" (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 200 lbs. (91 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 58 Ibs. (26 Kg) PS3S15C(a)BZ 15'(4.6m)x3 "(76mm) Wall thickness - 0.125" (3 mm) Base plate - 10" (254 mm) square x 0.750° (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4 " -10 x 18° (457 mm) + 3° (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10" (254 mm) 9.3" - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight -175 Ibs. (79 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -82 Ibs. (37 Kg) PS3S19C(a)BZ 19' (5.8 m) x 3" (76 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125° (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750° (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4 " -10 x 18° (457 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10" (254 mm) 9.3" - 11" (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight -150 lbs. (68 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 92 Ibs. (42 Kg) PS4S10C(a)BZ 10' (3.0 m) x 4" (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10° (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4' -10 x 18' (457 mm) + 3" (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10° (254 mm) 9.3° - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 300 lbs. (136 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 78 lbs. (35 Kg) 4S15C(a)BZ (4.6 m) x 4" (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125° (3 mm) Base plate - 10° (254 mm) square x 0.750" (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4°10 x 30" (762 mm) + 3° (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10" (254 mm) 9.3° - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 300 lbs. (136 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 119 Ibs. (54 Kg) PS4S19C(a)BZ 19' (5.8 m) x 4° (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10° (254 mm) square x 0.750" (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4-10 x 30" (762 mm) + 3° (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10° (254 mm) 9.3" - 11" (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight- 280 Ibs. (127 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -144 lbs. (65 Kg) PS4S22C(a)BZ 22' (6.7 m) x 4° (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125° (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750" (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4°10 x 30' (762 mm) + 3° (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10" (254 mm) 9.3° - 11" (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight- 240 lbs. (109 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -163 Ibs. (74 Kg) PS4S25C(a)BZ 25' (7.6 m) x 4° (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125" (5 mm) Base plate - 10" (254 mm) square x 0.750° (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4 " -10 x30' (762 mm) + 3° (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10" (254 mm) 9.3" - 11" (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 210 lbs. (95 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -182 lbs. (83 Kg) UUD LIGHTING PS4S25S(a)BZ 25' (7.6 m) x 4" (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188" (5 mm) Base plate - 10" (254 mm) square x 0.750° (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4°-10 x 30" (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10° (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 325 Ibs. (148 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 252 Ibs. (114 Kg) PS4S27C(a)BZ 27' (8.2 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10" (254 mm) square x 0.750" (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4°-10 x 30° (762 mm) + 3" (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3" - 11" (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 200 Ibs. (91 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -195 Ibs. (89 Kg) PS4S30S(a)BZ 30' (9.1 m) x 4" (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188° (5 mm) Base plate - 10" (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4°10 x30° (762 mm) + 3" (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10" (254 mm) 9.3° - 11" (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight- 250 Ibs. (113 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -301 lbs. (137 Kg) PS5S25S(a)BZ 25' (7.6 m) x 5" (127 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188" (5 mm) Base plate - 10° (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -1"-8 x 36" (914 mm) + 4' (102 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10° (254 mm) 9.7" - 11.3° (248 mm - 287 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 450 Ibs. (204 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 320 Ibs.(145 Kg) PS5S30S(a)BZ 30' (9.1 m) x 5° (127 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188° (5 mm) Base plate - 10" (254 mm) square x 0.750" (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -1 "-8 x36' (914 mm) +4° mm (102 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10° (254 mm) 9.7" - 11.3" (248 mm - 287 mm) Maximum fixture weight -375 Ibs. (170 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 379 Ibs. (172 Kg) PS6S30S(a)BZ 30' (9.1 m) x 6" (152 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188° (5 mm) Base plate - 12" (305 mm) square x 1" (25 mm) thick Anchor bolts -1 " -8 x 36" (914 mm) + 4" (102 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 11.5" (292 mm) 11.3° - 12.8' (286 mm - 324 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 525 Ibs. (238 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -457 Ibs. (207 Kg) 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA FEB 2 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES PHONE (262) 886 -1900 FAX (262) 884 -3309 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com 9/1/04 • • C I T Memorandum DATE: March 4, 2005 TO: Paul Bengston FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Apollo Landing Attached for your use is the TKDA review dated March 4, 2005 for the Apollo Landing project. These items must be addressed before final approval is given to the site. Please contact me at 651/982 -2430 with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Apollo Landing/Equinox Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: March 4, 2005 Introduction Comm. No. 13265 -002 Routing: A submittal package has been received for a proposed Planned Unit Development Project (PUD) at the northwest corner of the intersection of Apollo Drive and Lilac Drive. The proposed development would essentially consist of five separate buildings of varied types of use (hotel, restaurant, office /retail, office /commercial) on an 8.1 acre site. The following documents have been received: 1. Full -size and Half -size plan Sheets (7 sheets), prepared by Mattke Surveying and Engineering, Inc., all received by the City of Lino Lakes February 7, 2005. 2. Letter from Mattke Surveying and Engineering, Inc. to the City of Lino Lakes, dated December 4, 2004. 3. Letter from Mattke Surveying and Engineering, Inc. to the Rice Creek Watershed District, dated February 4, 2005. 4. Drainage Calculations dated February 2, 2005. 5. Traffic Study dated February 4, 2005, prepared by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik, and Associates 6. Geotechnical Report dated January 31, 2005, prepared by Stork Twin City Testing Corporation. Executive Summary Following is a general summary of the main items and issues that must be addressed. Further explanation of these items and additional items to be addressed are provided in the remainder of this review memorandum. 1. Drainage Calculations have been received and reviewed, but are not complete. Original drainage calculations performed for Apollo Drive Phase II (by S.E.H., Inc., May 1999) have also been obtained. The applicant must provide the full calculations as explained detailed further in this memorandum. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity 'Apollo Landing /Equinox Page 2 March 4, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 2. The Traffic Study has been reviewed and comments are provided within this memorandum. Generally, the data and conclusions provided in the report are not complete and the applicant has been requested to re -work the study. 3. The utility plan provided is not considered to be complete for construction purposes at this time. However, the utility plan as presented in concept is acceptable, and the comments provided herein are based upon the extent of plans completed to date. For example, storm sewer pipe sizes and structure invert and rim elevations are not provided. Standard utility plates, details, construction notes, provisions for erosion control, etc. must all eventually be provided as well. 4. The applicant has provided copies of correspondence to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The applicant shall be responsible for assuring compliance with the RCWD accordingly. 5. The proposed site development is located adjacent to two County roadways. The plat and site plan will therefore require the review and approval of Anoka County, both for the plat itself and with regards to driveway and site access. It is likely that the County will have comments with regards to right of way dedication and access from Apollo Drive. 6. Drainage and utility easements must be provided on the Preliminary Plat as described herein. Drainage 1. The first floor elevations shown for the proposed buildings would appear to be acceptable based on the information provided. However, because actual building plans are not provided, it is not known if there are proposed to be basements, lower openings, etc. In accordance with City standards, the lowest floor elevation must meet the City's minimum requirement of 2 feet above the 100 year flood level, 4 feet above normal water elevations and groundwater, and at least one foot over the emergency overflow elevation. The actual overflow location and elevation for Pond 1 must be provided on the plan. 2. The full Hydro -Cad calculations must be provided by the applicant so that they can be verified further against the previous design parameters provided in the S.E.H. calculations. At this time, only portions have been provided. Support computations are also needed for the stage- discharge used in the Hydro -Cad model 3. Floor and /or any low opening elevations for the existing building directly to the west must be verified against the 100 -year and overflow elevations. Based on the information provided, it would appear that the 100 -year elevation of the pond may be higher than the building's low floor. 4. Per correspondence provided with RCWD, the applicant is incorporating the use of infiltration basins on the site prior to discharge to the pond. This will aid in providing effective stormwater management and water quality, as discharge from the pond into the storm sewer system running • south down Apollo Drive (as shown) shall be limited to the originally designed system limits. The plans must ultimately receive final approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District. • Apollo Landing /Equinox Page 3 March 4, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 5. Long term maintenance responsibilities for the pond and infiltration areas must be eventually be clearly assigned in an Agreement between the City and applicant/future property owner. 6. An NPDES Phase II permit shall be required. All requirements of the Permit, including the submittal of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City, shall be completed prior to engaging in grading activities. Utilities 1. An internal sanitary sewer main is intended to serve the properties and connect to an existing 6 -inch service at Apollo Drive. The existing 6 -inch PVC connects to an existing 21 -inch trunk main running down Apollo Drive. The existing manhole and service at the property line should be inspected to verify the condition and elevation of the existing facilities, and that sufficient elevation difference above the 21 -inch main exists. This may be critical since the flow directions of the trunk main and the service appear to be in opposite directions. The sewer main itself must be at least 8 -inch diameter in accordance with City standards. 2. It is proposed to connect a water main to the existing 12 -inch diameter main on Apollo Drive. No size for the main is shown, and it must be a minimum of 8 -inch diameter. Provisions must be included in the plans for wet tapping to the 12 -inch main and for the connection near the center of Apollo Drive. A permit from the County and establishment of traffic and safety control measures during construction, and repair of the street will be required in accordance with County standards. 3. Individual sewer and water services are not shown on the plan. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet. 4. A minimum of two feet of cover over storm sewer pipe is desired. 5. Utility easements must be dedicated for the water and sanitary sewer mains extending into the property. 6. An extension from the proposed sewer main to the neighboring property (west) may be considered as feasible. Other 1. Long term maintenance responsibilities for the development area, including the detention areas must be addressed appropriately in an agreement between the Developer and the City. 2. Apollo Drive and Lilac Drive are under the jurisdiction of Anoka County. The plat and site plans will therefore require the review and approval of Anoka County, both for the plat itself and with regards to driveway and site access. It is likely that the County will have comments with regards to right of way dedication and access from Apollo Drive. At a minimum, right of way dedication will Apollo Landing /Equinox City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • Page 4 March 4, 2005 be required at the south end of the property where the streets are located. Typically, the County has requested right of way dedication of up to 60 feet from the center of a roadway, and it is likely that an Agreement with the County will be needed. 3. The proposed driveway entrance will also require a permit from the County. The County may have additional comments with regards to the driveway location, width, turning lanes, etc. 4. Drainage and utility easements must be provided around all detention and infiltration areas. In addition, the drive easement should also be designated as a drainage and utility easement. Platted drainage and utility easements adjacent to property lines (10 feet) must also be provided per City requirements. 5. A proposed site landscaping plan has been provided. Screening from adjacent properties is proposed by the use of a Wood Privacy Fence, subject to approval by the City. The Landscape Plan should either include or refer to the Grading Plan the proper establishment around the ponds and infiltration areas. 6. Soil borings generally indicate a soil profile of topsoil underlain by coarse alluvium. For the building foundation and roadway and parking area subgrades, varying amounts of engineering fill and granular material will be required. Recommendations as provided in the Geotechnical Report must be provided throughout construction. 7. In addition to trees and vegetation, the existing site contains various remains of structures and facilities from previous site use (foundations, silos, etc.). All above and below ground abandoned facilities must be removed from site and disposed properly. The removal of any septic, well or other such facilities shall be also subject to the rules and regulations of the State of Minnesota and /or Anoka County as required. 8. A Traffic Study has been reviewed as referenced above. The review found several concerns regarding project trip generation and the level of service analysis which will need to be addressed prior to final review and concurrence with the BRAA finding of no significant traffic impacts. Comments on the study are as follows: 1. Projected Trip Generation • Table 5 of the traffic study memorandum displays projected trips to be generated by the proposed development. There are shown to be about 35% reductions in total a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips generated due to pass -by and multi -use trips; however, the underlying assumptions for these reductions are not provided, nor are there any data that demonstrate what pass -by or multi -use trips were added to turn movements at specific intersections. Similarly, there is no accounting for the diverted trips that would be attracted from I -35W to the new businesses at the development site. These details must be provided before the review of this study can be completed. • 'Apollo Landing /Equinox Page 5 March 4, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • New project trips shown in the last row of Table 5 are not consistent with intersection movement totals on Figure 5 (Year 2007 With Apollo Landing Development) and Figure 4 (Year 2007 Without Apollo Landing Development) for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The new trips shown on Table 5 should equal the difference between the turn movement volumes from Figure 5 and Figure 4 for the affected movements. These numbers should be consistent to ensure the appropriate turn volumes were used in the level of service analyses. • A comparison of turn volumes from Figures 4 and 5 indicates a reduction of 70 p.m. peak southbound right turns at CSAH 23 /CR 12 under the "With- Project" scenario. This is most likely an error, as this turn movement would be expected to increase with the addition of project - generated trips. • The peak hour trips projected for the hotel are slightly lower than would be predicted using the Institute for Transportation Engineers Trip Generation handbook for an 80 -room hotel. The correct totals should be 45 a.m. peak hour trips and 49 p.m. peak hour trips. • The peak trip generator for a.m. peak hour is the 100% office scenario. This office -only scenario should be analyzed for the a.m. peak hour to establish a "worst- case" analysis during the morning peak. • 2. Future With- Project Levels of Service • Table 6 in the traffic study memorandum should include intersection approach levels of service. • The level of service analysis for with- project conditions shown in Table 6 indicates when compared to the without - project levels of service in Table 3, indicates that some turn movement LOS is estimated to improve under the with - project scenario. Specifically, at CR 23 /CR 12 in the p.m. peak hour, the northbound right turn is projected to improve from LOS B to LOS A, the southbound and eastbound left turns are shown to improve from LOS D to LOS C, and the eastbound right turn would improve from LOS C to LOS B. In addition, the northbound through and southbound left movements at CR12 /CR 153 are shown to improve from LOS A to LOS B in the p.m. peak hour. These results are not consistent with what would be expected under a with - project scenario with the addition of project trips and turn movements to the system. The size and varied uses of the site suggest that at peak periods, a fair amount of traffic will be present internally. Although, there appears to be good circulation within the site itself, the presence of a single access point may cause periodic congestion at the entrance, depending on the types of businesses established. • • • Recommendations Of the February 23, 2005 Environmental Board Apollo Landing /Equinox Development/Environmental Site Plan Review The February 23, 2005 Lino Lakes Environmental Board made the following recommendations concerning Apollo Landing: Motion to approve the rezoning of the land with the condition of the Environmental Board future review of PUD and review each PUD phase level by O'Connell, 2nd by Baumann. All were in favor. Marshan Meadows, Bruggeman Properties, 7364 Lake Drive, Preliminary Plat Review. The February 23, 2005 Environmental Board made the following recommendations concerning Marshan Meadows: • Surface Water Plan should show access for pond and infiltration area maintenance. • Surface Water volume calculations for pond and infiltration areas should be verified for adequacy. • Investigate removing storm pipe going into the lake and replace with a swale /rain swale design. • Direct all water from impervious areas to pervious. • Plan must address the 200 -foot area along the lake in terms of NPDES requirements that slopes be stabilized within 7 days in disturbance areas. • A temporary sediment pond diverting water on the SE side of the project would address BMP concerns for containing eroded materials. • A Conservation Easement should be described, for the Shoreland impact zone and the surface water treatment areas. • Signage should be placed at the easement areas describing wetland conservation, no mow, no dumping areas, as well as important natural considerations such as nesting water birds and Blandings Turtle. • An information brochure should be published and given to all property owners describing the Classification and nature of Marshan Lake and that appropriate boating should be confined to non - motorized uses. It should also describe rare species habitat considerations for the area, and conservation easement requirements. • Ponding and infiltration areas should be planted with the City native seed mix. Planting soils should not be incorporated into these areas in order to preserve areas that turtles might still nest. • Curbing in the project should be designed so that turtles can cross roads. (The Lino Lakes Blandings Turtle Modal shows this area as a possible breeding site.) • • • • Transitional native seed mix should be used for 8 -10 feet from all sodded areas. A seed such as Blue gramma should be used for this. • Developer should submit a detailed NPDES plan for using BMP's on this site. For example, the rock entrance should say, "at least 50 feet of rock entrance shall be placed." The developer should indicate where on site the NPDS plan and inspection reports would be located on site. Motion to recommend approval with staff and Environmental Board recommendations by Grundhoffer, 2nd by Bor. All were in favor. 4.• umrse: KC, Somata% Ost 4.7 660.01 Pm! ter X23. BE ow. oee els- xr. 020. Or- II, xli. • -VrwIlf ";;10 x,reer at xr 011. 80 8,9• X Oak \ F24. a.9.0,10;re Ow. um 0 ... '". 0.1[11• On \xr Itows• r . .. oe OVA XV' \ / 0..04 Old ,do, X citsai, XIV ww A X7* Ost . w-ax. Os (Use Darx410X0110•1 kir Oa its- Oak .1111E '"batt BE Cels II 7. s• XT. SO Xr OE asK ce`- K 40• 0.0. ------------ ----- -906- ---------- N89.00403W Xr FO ------- • --------------- -------- •- -• - • •■ •••-. olr cuue / " ----- SO6- ------- L - .--7 9GE „ X• A ir BC xlr 9f x ` utut (. 1 • 7 Ds % X496.E. 40 50 eefe inn swIr EMIG BE 010. / ner et 410..;;L„r,,..., XV' lir at 00. IN • r ) , ------ ---2. ----- 4 A / / •,,‘, o F d 0 kion %IV 210. BE OE x2r BE „4. • 7■2" Ix '2. IIE/N ; us-,or 28u 0 05/ Is 10' 974;:i.i.:In• x'rxt5. • Xr Bw 21(1. Cowww000E----. A wr 045* • 11. tin, 5 5.5 / Oa" Orn''W ------- rr. xlz• Ber 0l0 0. /xi' BE \ 0l0 0441 I \ 1 05 / • I ( / „, • \ -- ------- .rr or fC we •arhl 905-- •••• .09 • 0. / Total Site Areo 348,883 SF u 8.01 Acres Net Site Area = 340,264 SF - 7.81 Acrea / • ■ • 0,, • .0' ■•■:, er",`.!;.'.`" oc4. 02 ...... ----- --".. • ----- 904 --------- \W0080 836.9 Pei / • r.// • • ------------ , 8‘. \/ Ur rue ,„_ N8900'03"W 180.00 • - / • ;10+.00 905 57 y. 883 22 . . / •-• 4CP 9010 t” • 9024 .• ▪ Seer .• :8 8: 80 90888 •. 90.2-201 .• ------ 9C5 CI ••• ----- 73.4910 79 ,,WZ.051029.0,; / NOTE: ANY UTIUTIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST 8E VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTIUTIES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF ME CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE LOCATION OF SUCH. • • • - ..... ..... e GRAPHIC SCALE ( 04 FEET ) 1 Inch = 50 It Property Descriptioe: RECEN ED 30 2.045 CVC-1 Parcel A That part of the We 660.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka Cooney, Mumma lying South of the North 500.00 fret and North of the South 500.00 feet therecE according to the US Government Survey, Anoka County, Minoesota AND That part of the West 500.00 feet of the South 500.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest Comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. thence Easterly along the South fine of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a divorce of 320.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be desedbed: thence Northerly at a right snit, a distance of 500.00 feet and there terminating, subject to easemecas of record, if any, and road right of way. Parcel 13 That part of the East 160.00 feet oldie West 660.00 fitet of the South 500.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31. Range 22, accordiog to the US Government Survey thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying North of a line being 50.00 fed North of the centerline of public street described as follows: Corrunenciag at the South Quarter Corner of said Section 8, Toon:Min 31, Range 22; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the South line of said Southeast Quarto- of the Southwest Quinn a distance of 836.79 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence Northeasterly 1124.51 feet along the arc of a Ivo-tangential curve, concave to the Southeast, having a central angle of 78 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds, and a radius of 818.51 feet, the long chord of which bears North 67 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds East 1038.14 fret; thence South 73 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 221.72 ixt, 05000 00 less, 00 0* centerline of Lake Drive and there terminating; subject to easements 00 1000041, if any. he•elsy certify mot :11■9 survey 008 prepared ACCITiCNS / RE ViSiONS • b me or .ncer my direct supervision, Coe No DA .)?*2 ICHXD APP -v0T ; COMMEN TS :not 1 orn 0 duly Licensee Lond Surveyor under the :owe o, the State or minnesoto I 2604 * Mottke. LS • 11 bh1.1 44 ; No 15612 I ! AILMattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 3 7671 Central Averue NE I Fridley, MN 55432 (612) 783-0300 au Thi OR i Tr Equinox Development. LLP 425 Arrowhead Drive, #E • Lino Lakes. MN 5501 (612) 408-2826 PROJECT TITLE DRAWING TITLE Apollo Landing Existing Conditions 0RA %et; CADD APPROVED TVA& I OR k MUG 1 OF ti ci,EcxEo DATE. 12/3/04 =50 7 Dump4& SB9'06'04 "E 660.01 10_1/1_ 24 vir 16,656 SF 60 24 Dumpsters 11,000 SF 200 20 20 0 0 m N89'00'03'W 322.21 O O O 01 0 0 z L_ ( 18 24 8 ;III 54 Spaces Ill 90 6.750 SF 19 600 SF 70 m 30 10 n to SO0'44'49 "W 24 8 1 //✓ O / Detention Pond // / / / / Lilac Drive N89 00'03'W 180.00 NOTE: ANY UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTIUTIES MAY EXIST. AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR Tr) CFTAIN THE 1 (r.AT1C1N ()F Stl(14_ 10 / =868.51 / L =233.39 6=15'23'4 GRAPHIC SCALE 144185: 1 Ar 0 , ; SIC 5 9.06 :,cut: ,2 _ ■"o. 2 AL Pcr4, -g S :o's 9'520 E-•c -to -..0 3. .0, 'Jr .re ■sl"s 24' Molt• l.E,CeOI ).4411 6 t ) 4 Ail .119 SetOOL.s 4: 6V�'C'ng 58120[45 30 6. A'. 5,4 r195 -0110 11l'.!'11, cl 6 !'ores D'.ve isle !c 9o.d r■9 ( !N FEET ) 1 trch - 50 ft Totes Slte Area = 348,883 SF 8.01 Acres Existing Impervious Area: Apollo Drive Imp. Area = 4,679 SF Other Imp. Arad = 3,710 SF Total Impervious Area = 8,389 SF = 0.19 Aces SETBACK DATA SITE DATA }.AND USE GUIDE PLAN Existing: Commercial ZONING Existing: Rural Proposed: General Business SITE AREA CALCULATIONS Lot Arca Minimum Required (GB): Proposed: Lot Width Minimum Required (GB): Proposed: 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 100 FT 100 FT Existing Pervious/Impe vious Areas Impervious arca: 8,389 SF (0.19 Acres) 2.4% Pervious area: 340,494 SF (7.82 Acres) 97.6% Total Arca: 348,883 SF (8.01 Acres) 100% Proposed Pervious/Impervious Arras: Pervious Arco Required Minimmum: 87,221 SF (2.00 Acres) 25.0% Proposed 102,950 SF (2.36 Acres) 29.5% Perimeter Areas 88.150 SF (202 Acres) 25.3% Hotel Landscaping 3,800 SF (0.09 Acres) (.O'�(e Islands and peninsulas 11,000 SF (0.25 Acres) j4Z /C Impervious Area / Maximum Allowed 261.662 SF (6.01 Acres) 75.0% Proposed: 245,933 SF (5.65 Acres) 70.5% Building Pad Areas: 57,886 SF (1.33 Acres) 16.6% Total Arca 348,883 SF (8.01 Aces) 10090 RECEIVED JAN 1 0 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES.. Proposed: Front Yard Building Local Street Collector or Arterial Street Puking Side Yard: Building: Parking: Rcar Yard: Bulldmg: Parking: PROPOSED BUILDING DATA Hotel (80 UUnitts): j( (s ,Square Feet Parking Required: 9S Spaces Proposed: 100 Spaces Rctail/Office,Cortsnercial: 34,080 Square Fat Parking Required: 153 Spaces Proposed: 186 Spaces 30 Feet 40 Feet 15 Feet 30 Feet 10 Feet 30 Feet 10 Feet Restaurant: 6,750 Square Feet Parking Required. T1 Spaces 1l Preposcd: 54 Spaces a. I'r % nabs Maxunum Structure Height 45 Feet 1 hereby certify that this survey was pre0DreC AOD�1!0lsS i REVSC�S Dy me or under my direct at.0erv,sion, end NO . DATf D 9001' CHKD i+.PRVei COMMENT, �I� 1801 am c duly L.cen seal Lend Surveyor Mattlro Surveying & Engineerin O. Inc. „nder the is lows of the State o! MmnesotO. ,. 767 vents rven,e NE 1 �rdie ;. MN 55432 rv. }h 783 -0300 Teat w. Mattke. LS Equinox Development, LLP �At, TFFCR�TY 425 Arrowhead Drive, /E PROTECT TITLE Apollo Landing Lino Lakes, UN 550' (812) 408 -2826 :940011!G nrlE Site Plan ,v 0A00 AP -90;90 Twu 09401N0 I 01 04AW .r.ro o iss in., SCAiE: 1 " =50' 1 2 1 7 • Inv. 904.4 • -9,77r 0.5% —.I, 910 00 1 k 00 908 50 /TOM _0§49 5 908.00 1- • ........... / / 912 11 ••• Uilac/Drive ........ NOTE: ANY UllUTIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTILITIES MAY EXIST. AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE LOCATION OF SUCH. B••••• CB RE 905 86 v 2 in • • • • • - ..... x:. "„• .„„, •C• 1n. 9011;4 ..... ..... ----- ---- .0,o• 905 01 • ' ---- .. GRAPHIC SCALE I IN FLET 1 1000 - 50 It Siltfence • I hereby certsty Mot this plan, spechcoton, or resort was PH:avec by me or under my chrect supervision, 000 1901 1 OM 9 duty Licensed Profess•onai Engineer under tne State of kAinnesato Statutes. Sections 326 02 to 326 16. •ODIT■ONS / REVISIONS DATE bPw,- MKD pPvD COMMENTS Teed W. Moltke. P E. Dote: ia./a.f/dM Minn License No.15612 1 Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 7671 Centrc: Avenue NE Fr.oley, MN 55432 (612; 783-0300 !AUTHORITY PRO-1EO T TITLE Equinox Development, LLP Una Lakes. UN 5501 425 Arrowhead Drive. g (812) 408-2826 Apollo Landing DRAWING TITLE Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control PI CF I Dam*. cAoo Ar-PRovto scAis 1 . =50 . DRAvANG I 4 7 CHECKED DATE, 12/21/04 I • • • O CO N r1 w i • • 1 FF 911.0 Inv. 901.17 3 FF 912.0 Inv. 900.79 v mr/f0.0 • • OAR/ 4 FF 912.5 0 0 va 7) t. Snow. Buidkgi 5 FF 911.0 qP') -6 .4. O...." Ave ;1;0,1 \ / hs` Pond Norm Pond 902.20 100—Year 908.24 NOTE: ANY UT1U11ES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VF_RIF1ED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTILITIES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE LOCATION OF SUCH. hereby Certfly toot Inns .u.sey way prepare.: ny me or under my direct Swatereanon. and :not orn o duly Licensee Lend Surveyor under tne Iowa of the Stole of Minnesota. ).1 art. Tecd W. uottke. Dote- /24o/oquinn tjcvne No 15612 ADDITIONS / REvISIONS DAE RwN.jc1K0PPo1 COMMENTS GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ) Inch - 50 ft • • RECEIN,hu JAN 1 0 2005 rtrrY OF LINO LAKES 1 AL Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 7671 Cen:rcl Avenue NE Frioley, MN 55432 (612) 753-0300 • Equinox Deveiopment. U_F' Lino Lakes. MN 5501 ALITNORiTY 425 Arrowhead Drive, #E (612) 405-2826 PROXCT TITLE Apollo Landing DRAWING TITLE Utility Plan DRAWN C4CD APPROVED " TWa4' SCAL 1 = 50 I ORA;NG E ' CHECKED DATE 12/21/04 I 0, 7 • • • U L T d V 3 0 Treated Wood Privacy Fence IJ Sad u u Dumoster i Treated Wood Privacy Fence 4 E 3 0 ( 1 I 5 Lilac Drive NOTE: ANY UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTILITIES MAY EXIST, AND IT MALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE LOCATION OF SUCH. GRAPHIC SCALE 4�y Notes: 1. Entire site will be stabilized against erosion. 2. Parking islands will have 2" wood chips over landscape fabric. 3. Custom Landscape Plans will be developed for each individual building. 4. Main Drive Isle including islands and sidewalk will be constructed In first phase. ( 51 FEET) 1 loch " 50 ft. ucrsrulr Seedless Green As 4 • RECEN JAM 1 0 2005 ninf nF 'UNC LAKES • nereoy certify that I1,3 Survey was prepared Dy ,,e or under my d!rect supervision. ane that 1 am a duly Licensed .and Surveyor ureic, the lows o' the State of Mnnesoto Yn.m. Teed W Mattke. ..S ADDITIONS_ / __ R�VIS�ONS NC I DATT DRWN. CHKD. P.PPVC COMMENTS 1 I I � d Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. ai 7571 Centro! Avenue NE ridiey, MN 55432 (512) 783 -0300 Equinox Development. LLP Lino Lakes, MN 550 AUTHORITY 425 Arrowhead Drive. fIE (612) 408 -2526 DRO.:ECT TtT_E Apollo Landing „m„, nr,- Landscaping Plan DRAWN CARD APPacED Thu) SCAT., 1' =50' i ORA NG 1 7 • _ —. 13`72+ x<?rt6' 9!0.43 r,::.l. .,e] 1.,,. •.9 IC, BE .4' B[ ON•'e�lnn '1 --914 FF / / . WIT SC `I(12• MO' K iFF 913.0 03 % .eE x � x, °• °t ° 904.50 90:..0909. ea it 7575 ,y 9% 909.34\910.25 w .a n 908' j FF 911.00 L'ilac-'Drive NOTE: ANY UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTILITIES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE LOCATION OF SUCH. 95 2 / i•i, `408•. 0_ 1 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FELT 1 1 inch - 50 ft RECEIVED AN 1 0 2.005 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • hereby cert ly trot tha survey woe Preaarec by me or under my cirec' supervision. and NO the: ! am a dwy L'censee _one Surveyc' under Ire laws of tre State of Minnesota. =,.c( ra. )-1 or . 7 ADDITIONS DATE bRWN. ICHKD IAPPVD / REVISIONS COMMENTS Teas W. Uett *e, L5 Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 7677 Centre! Avenue NE = riciey, MN 55432 (6 ■ 2) 783 -0300 Equinox Development. L P Lino Lakes. MN 55. A(/ITORIT• 425 Arrowhead Drive. It (612) 408 -2824: iPRO.. CT TITLE DRAWING TITLE 'DRAWN CARD APPROVED rAJ SCALE 1'cSn' Apollo Landing Trees that may be Save; DRAWING i .5,0W*55 50.50**R46555. A - ' 751gt fa4Tir*., filti"5; ." tz 11111•11•1111ra, Lf T"?.47i arg affag, 5. 6 5 55 *,5 EMMA Mfr.f-4 .ow mut., Aig=100:4,11w*** ii'i11rT,r 111 01.1111.111111111111M7 - kr Z 5.545 4TON I- SCLE 1/1&"41'-0' EQUINOX DE' oF 'ENT AGENDA ITEM V.D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: March 9, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plat Vaughan Addition BACKGROUND Mike Vaughan has requested approval of a five lot single - family residential subdivision entitled Vaughan Addition. The subject property is located on the south side of Birch Street approximately 2,180 feet east of Ware Road. The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on January 10, 2005. The title commitment for the property and final plat have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. As required under the conditions of preliminary plat approval, the applicant has submitted a Rice Creek Watershed permit. Another condition of approval requires that right of access be granted to Anoka County. This is not currently shown on the final plat; but will be required prior to the item being scheduled for the City Council. All other conditions of approval will be met with building permit review of the subdivision or through the development contract between the applicant and the city that is still being developed. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the final plat for Vaughan Addition. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 ATTACHMENTS 1. City Engineer's memorandum dated March 3, 2005 2. Final Plat submitted February 8, 2005 Memorandum DATE: March 3, 2005 TO: Paul Bengtson FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer >2 RE: Vaughan Addition Attached is the TKDA review dated March 3, 2005, of the submitted documents for the Vaughan Addition site. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this project. Please contact me with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651- 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 -982 -2410 TKDA .ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Lino Lakes City Engineer Copies To: 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Reference: Engineering Review of Vaughan Addition City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Comm. No. 13265.002 From: Patrick M. Windler, P.E. Routing: Date: March 3, 2005 The proposed Vaughan Addition (Mike Vaughan, Developer) development site includes the construction of five (5) single - family homes on an existing three (3) acre parcel. The parcel has an existing residence which will be demolished. The property is located along the south side of Birch Street (Anoka CSAH #10) between Tomahawk Trail and West Shadow Drive (across from the Rice Lake Elementary School). Street access from Birch Street to the site will be by a cul -de -sac configuration. Anoka county will require di ri ght turn bay from eastbound Birch Street to the proposed cul -de -sac. All the lots will be served by City of Lino Lakes sanitary sewer, watermain, and integrated storm sewer system. The following documents have been received or are being used for the below engineering review: 1. Previous Lino Lakes City engineering review by Scott Brink, P.E., and dated January 4, 2005. 2. Development plans for "Vaughan Addition — Final Plans for: Sanitary, Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, and Street" as prepared by Loucks Associates (undated and unsigned). Stamped "received" in Lino Lakes City Offices on February 7, 2005. Plan Sheets: C0 -1 to C9 -1, L1 -1 in full and reduced size. 3. Soils Report/Analysis by STS Consultants, Ltd., entitled: "Housing Subdivision at 600 Birch Street in Lino Lakes, Minnesota" and signed by Mervyn Mindess, P.E., on 12/22/04. Stamped "received" in Lino Lakes City Offices on February 7, 2005. Approximately 30 pages. 4. Wetland Delineation Report for 600 Birch Street as prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc., and dated July 16, 2004. Stamped "received" at Lino Lakes City Offices on February 7, 2005. Approximately 16 pages. 5. "VAUGHAN ADDITION" plat as prepared by Loucks Associates (unsigned and undated). Stamped "received" at Lino Lakes City Offices on February 8, 2005. Two plan sheets in full and reduced size. io 6. Various maps and calculation sheets using the storm modeling "HydroCAD" for existing and post - development conditions for the 1 -Year, 2 -Year, 10 -Year, and 100 -Year rainfall design event as prepared by Loucks Associates, Ltd., with various dates. Stamped "received" at Lino Lakes City Offices on February 7, 2005. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Memo Page 2 March 3, 2005 Vaughan Addition Engineering Review ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS 1. PLAN SHEET C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Show all the existing contour line work. Also show the wetland delineation line work to the east of the parcel. 2. STREET SYSTEM ITEMS: a. Radius at intersection of west curbline and cul -de -sac of Vaughan Court shall be 30 feet and not the 14 feet as shown on the plans. b. Radii at the intersection of Vaughan Court and Birch Street (Anoka CSAH #10) shall be a minimum of 20 feet unless Anoka County permitting requires a larger size. c. Install a "STOP" sign in the southeast corner of Vaughan Court and Birch Street following Anoka County and Mn/DOT requirements. d. Install a "NO OUTLET" sign on west side of Vaughan Court and just past the bituminous trail per Mn/DOT requirements. e. Install Pedestrian Curb Ramps at the intersection of Vaughan Court and the bituminous trail (parallel to Birch) following MnIDOT 7036B Standard Plate (truncated dome) unless otherwise directed by the Anoka County access permit. 3. PLAN SHEET C2 -2 RIGHT TURN LANE: Provide the City Engineer an approved copy of the permit(s) as required by Anoka County that are necessary for the right turn lane construction or other issues. The Anoka County Highway Department has specific requirements that must be followed and these shall be shown on the plans. 4. PLAN SHEET C4 -0 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN: a. Connection to the existing Lino Lakes watermain system shows that the existing fire hydrant is in line with (or on top of) the existing watermain. It extends beyond the existing fire hydrant and terminates at an existing gate valve to the south. This sequence is unlikely and needs to be further investigated. If the existing fire hydrant is set on tee to the side of the watermain, a hydrant gate valve will need to be installed at this time as well as a connection gate valve at the proposed watermain system location. Also, label the size of the existing watermain system on the plan sheet. Memo Vaughan Addition Engineering Review Page 3 March 3, 2005 b. List the following Watermain Items on the Plan Sheet: • Fire Hydrant: Waterous Pacer WB -67 • Gate Valve: Resilient Seat Gate Valve — Mueller A2370 -20 • Corporation Stop: Mueller H -15000 • Curb Stop: Mueller H -15154 Mark II Oraseal • Curb Box: Mueller H -1300 w/Mpls. Top 1.5 MPT c. Sanitary services to Lots 3 and 4 are shown as connecting directly into sanitary MH 1. This is not allowed, and the services shall be moved into the mainline with a wye connection system. d. List on the plans that storm and sanitary solid manhole casting assemblies (covers) shall be NEENAH R -1642 (or equivalent) with two concealed pick holes and sanitary sewer raised lettering. This includes the connection existing sanitary manhole cover must be replaced if necessary. e. Provide to the City Engineer an approved copy of the MDH (water) and MCES/MPCA (sanitary) permits. 5. STORM SEWER SYSTEM • a. What is the purpose of the culvert in Lot 5? Could the lot be graded so it would not be needed? b. Minimum storm sewer size is 15" RC pipe. 12" may be used for catch basin leads. c. CMP storm sewer is not allowed. d. CB 2 does not have enough cover from top of pipe to rim. e. What is the HWL of the wetland along the east property line? f. What is the HWL of the wetland on the southeast property line? g. Location and elevation of emergency overflow need to be shown for the rain gardens. h. Low openings must be one foot above the emergency overflows for rain gardens. i. Lowest floor elevation, including basements, must be four feet above the anticipated high groundwater level; four feet above the normal water level; or two feet above the HWL, whichever is greater. j. Existing Condition Curve Numbers and Time of Concentrations are acceptable. • k. For proposed conditions, HRCS Type "B" Soils shall be assumed for all disturbed areas where, under existing conditions, NRCS Type "A" Soils exist. Memo Page 4 March 3, 2005 Vaughan Addition Engineering Review 1. Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District is needed. m. Are the rain gardens public or private? If public, easements with access are needed. If private, a maintenance schedule and covenance need to be submitted. n. The proposed 2, 10, and 100 discharge rates may not exceed the existing 2, 10, and 100 discharge rates. o. 15" out of pond outlet. p. Outlet Control Structure is unbuildable, according to the contour. Detail shows bottom of outside structure as 890.5. Contour in the area is 893.0. q. The plans show an existing culvert (14 " ?) under the existing driveway. Will this be replaced or removed, and how does this correlate to the ditch drainage along Birch Street? Also, define the drainage pattern(s) along Birch Street based on the proposed development modifications. r. Provide on the plans a detail of the riprap structure (assume) between the storm ponds on the east side of the development. 06. Sheet C9 -1 UTILITY DETAILS: Delete the "Bituminous Paving Section" shown and replace on the plans using a typical street section format showing all the appropriate dimensions as necessary for Vaughan Court street and cul -de -sac. The minimal typical street section shall be as follows: 1.5" LVWE45030C 2.0" LVNW35030C 6" Aggregate Base — Class 5 (100% crushed limestone or recycled concrete w/ Cl 5 gradation) 24" Select Granular Borrow (Mn/DOT 3149.2B2) Note that any fill required below this section and under the street/cul -de -sac and after topsoil removal shall use Select Granular Borrow as fill materials. • VAU(,iHAN AUDI I IUN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Michael E. Vaughan, Single, owner and proprietor of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part of the North 345.8 feet of the Southeast 114 of Southwest 114 of Section 29, Township 31, North, Range 22 West, lying East of the West 879.46 feet, except the East 60 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota, Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as VAUGHAN ADDITION, and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the street, cul-de -sac and also dedicates the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said Michael E. Vaughan, has hereunto set his hands this day of , 200 . Michael E. Vaughan, Single. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200_, by Michael E. Vaughan, Single. Notary Public County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as VAUGHAb ADDITION; that this plat is a correct representation of said survey; that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments will be correctly placed in the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no wetlands as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.02, Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated other than as shown. Richard L Licht, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 26724 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of , 200_, by Richard L. Licht, Registered Land Surveyor. Notary Public Hennepin County, Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 2009 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA This plat of VAUGHAN ADDITION was approved by the City Council of Lino Lakes, oa, the regular meeting thereof held this _ day of 2 applicable, written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsec without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes_ Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA Mayor Clerk ANOKA COUNTY SURVEYOR Checked and approved this day of , 200 Anoka County Surveyor CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA, MN SEC. 29, T31 N, R22W. CITY OF LINO LAKES • W LN4E OF THE 5E 1/4 OF THE Sw 1/4 OF SEC 29 S'LY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE AS SHOWN ON ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT- OF -IYAY PLAT NO 11 - i `1 r 1 I I I 12 I",o' I I I s� I I b a -- 87946 l5� 93 1 44 I ro VA UC,iHAN ALAN HUN N89'S8'28 "W 377.07 U N. LINE OE THE 5E 1/4 OF THE 514, 1/4 OF SEC. 19. T. 31 N. R. 22 w e 1 I I� .w I^ F, I W 1 I n :T I H I - O _ 25.7 1 r ---,: -4�79-' J ry N I I I 1 213.12 e BIRCH STREET (C.SAH. NO. 10 ) 182.7/ 575'li'4 5 60.00 J0 -, 163.75 0 e 1.34.24 30.00 1,: N 89'58'18" w 30 0 L. 91.98 \ °.. _ . 4 4 / \' s s. \\ // N. 4 51 '06'54 / /� _ G 57.53 1 \\ / / \ \ / / \ \ / / \ \ 4 / / \ \ / / \ \ / / \ 1 / \ \ /Ip / \ ,P \ \ � 3 \ u /.n'' / / \ a\ l 9 / \ l" B L - cC K \� \ \ ,, \ / / / c , SH : - 1 . 62.44 ' _ / / / -1 � 78.96 'T -5 n N -U- DLNAEGAE SFNED 1/7 - -- 4 N ` - ---- 185.83 2 40 9857 60.0 5. LINE OF THE N. 345.8 FEET OF THE 5E 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 29 589 °5878'E 376.36 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA, MN SEC. 29, T31N, R22W. NORTH FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE EAST LINE OF 1HE 5E 1/4 OF THE 5w 1/4 SEC. 29 HAS AN 85004ED BEARING OF 500'26'48 "E 0 30 M.711 60 SCALE IN FEET O DENOTES I/2 INCH 0 14 INCH /Row MONUMENT SET. UARKED "RL5 26724" • DENOTES IRON MO/UUENT FOUND NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS' 11f 5 II II 10 11' 10 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES. AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES. AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) CEN TER✓ILLE RO LoUCKS ASSOCIATES • • £rs� West Shadow Ponds end Addition ' —ef tans ' 230.38 R7 � '75.00 _ : � 2689'58'25 °E �e 0 M 0 2 3wo.^ O 1 Oi co , . / ^ vs.\ \ t`J ., r `c• 1 rrr•••LLL 589'58'25'E 3619.60 :Li i S89'58'25'E _ } S 155.38 n �+ rotp g�` o �o�� �_IUtitilty n Easement. 69.12 4 ,* I 1 Block.; _ 4242.48.21P 569 58'25 "�_— 1ZJg? atit,°°Q %� I m' 230.36 y / L 95.00 J L .I 135.38 o• M O N 230.38 889'58'25 "E --Southwest corner of Northwest Quarter at Section 32. 131, R22, Anoka County, Minnesota South line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 32, 131. R22 O 0 80 L S89'58'25 -E 1421.54 Southeast Corner pt Northeast Quarter —. of Section 32. 131. R22, Anoka County, Minnesota KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Richard S. Carlson Development, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, to -wit: The North 189.08 feet of the South 229.08 feet of the West 230.36'feet of the East half of the East half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 31, Range 1:2, Anoka County, Minnesota Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as WEST SHADOW .PONDS 2ND ADDITION and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on the plat. In witness whereof said Richard 5. Carlson Development, LLC has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _day of ,20 • Richard S. Carlson Development, LLC Richard S. Carlson, as Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) The foregoing instrument was ackotovyledged before me this _ day of COUNTY OF ) 20 , by Richard S. Carlson as Chief Manager of Richard S. Carlson Development, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota . My Commission expires I hereby certify that I'have surveyed and platted the property desert-lied on this plat as WEST SHADOW PONDS 2ND . ADDITION, that this plat is a correct representation of the survey, That all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot, that all monuments will be correctly placed in the ground as designated, that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat, and that there are no wet lands as defined in MS 505.02, Subd. I, or public highways to be designated other than as shown. Tedd W. Mattke, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 15612 STATE OF MINNESOTA) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of COUNTY OF ) , 20 , by Tedd W. Mattke, Land Surveyor. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission expires 1 hereby certify that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County; Minnesota, duly accepted and approved the plat of WEST SHADOW PONDS 2ND ADDITION at a regular meeting held this day of 20 . If applicable, written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City, or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City of Lino Lakes Anoka County, Minnesota; By By , Mayor , C:ty Manager Checked and Approved this _ day of By , Anoka County. Surveyor. ,20 . RECMED JAN 2 I 2005 LAKES CITY OF LI City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 32, T.31, R.22 0 GRAPHIC SCALE Im ( IN FEET) 1 inch = 50 ft. NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT, THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, T31, R22 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR 589'58'25 "E. • DENOTES AN ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT o DENO -ES 1/2" IRON PIPE SET AND MARKED BY R.LS. REGISTRATION NO. 15612 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: r -5 NO SCALE . BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING RIGHT —OF —WAY LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. ' Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. • • • AGENDA ITEM V.E. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: March 9, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plat West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition BACKGROUND Richard Carlson and Associates has requested approval of a two lot single - family residential subdivision entitled West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition. The subject property is located adjacent to the northwest corner of 62 ❑d Street and West Shadow Lake Drive. The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on October 11, 2004. The title commitment for the property and final plat have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. All conditions of approval will be met with building permit review of the subdivision or through the development contract between the applicant and the city that is still being developed. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the final plat for West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 ATTACHMENTS 1. City Engineer's memorandum dated February 10, 2005 2. Final Plat submitted January 21, 2005. A • Memorandum DATE: February 10, 2005 TO: Jeff Smyser FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition Attached for your use is the TKDA review dated February 9, 2005. This review has been sent to Ted Mattke and Richard Carlson. Please contact me with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1 182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 TKDA GINEERS •ARCH • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.cam To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition . City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Engineering Review Copies To: . City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Comm. No. 13265.002 From: Patrick M. Windier, P.E. V,MN' Routing: Date: February 9, 2005 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition is a lot split that will include two new single family residences. Currently, the unsplit lot has an existing home that will be demolished to make way for the two proposed homes. This subdivision is located in the northwest corner of 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake Drive in the southwestern portion of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota. 62nd Street was improved along with a bikeway that parallels the property. City of Lino Lakes sanitary sewer service and water service is available to each of the proposed lots. IIP The followin g documents were used to produce the below engineering review: • 1. "West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition Plat" as prepared by Mattke Surveying and Engineering, Inc. for the Developer, Richard S. Carlson Development, LLC. It is unsigned and undated. Stamped received in the City of Lino Lakes offices on January 21, 2005. (One plat sheet in full and reduced plan size.) 2. "Preliminary Plat - Lot Split, Grading and Erosion Control Plan" for West Shadow Pond 2nd Addition as prepared by Mattke Surveying and Engineering, Inc. for the Developer Richard S. Carlson Development, LLC. The plan sheet is signed by Tedd W. Mattke, RLS and P.E. on May 11, 2004 with a revision date of August 24, 2004. Stamped received in the City of Lino Lakes offices on January 21, 2005. (One plan sheet in full and reduced size.) Engineering Review Comments: At this time there are no engineering review comments outside of approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District, if necessary. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity AGENDA ITEM VI. B • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: March9�, 2005 TOPIC: Temporary Signage BACKGROUND The P & Z has been discussing the issue of temporary signage since January 2003. The purpose is to prepare an amendment to the sign ordinance to clearly address the issues involved. We have made progress by agreeing on how to regulate portable signs and banners. Several other temporary signage issues still remain before we prepare an ordinance amendment. DISCUSSION Portable Signs and Banners: The P & Z agreed on requirements for portable signs and banners. Those requirements will be incorporated into a sign ordinance amendment. Window Signs: The P & Z agreed that window signs inside the building will not be regulated except that flashing window signs are not to be allowed. Stringers: At the January meeting, we discussed "stringers ", also known as pennants or other names. These are the small flags or garland type devices in long strings. The most common location for these is car lots. I suggest the following definition: Pennants or Stringers: Any lightweight plastic, fabric, or other material, whether or not containing a message of any kind, suspended from a rope, wire, or string, usually in series, designed to move in the wind. The P & Z considered how to regulate these, with three options being offered: 1. Pennants are to be regulated with a temporary permit with the same requirements as banners and portable signs for duration and number of occurrences. (Measuring the square footage would be impossible for some strings.) 2. Pennants are to be allowed without regulation: they are not significant enough to worry about. • • Temporary Signage page 2 3. Pennants are to be prohibited altogether. Rows of flapping pennants contribute to streetscape clutter and do not communicate any essential message other than "look at me ". We need to come to an agreement on pennants. Miscellaneous Cardboard and Other Non - permanent Signs: Several businesses use non - permanent signs made of cardboard and other inexpensive material. These signs commonly advertise prices of goods such as cigarettes, soft drinks, and the like. The signs often are attached to permanent fixtures such as pylon signs, or to temporary stakes or posts. These signs often are left on the property for lengthy periods of time. When multiple signs are used, the property looks cluttered and unsightly. There are several options for addressing these non - permanent signs: 1. Prohibit them completely. The reasoning here would be that these inexpensive signs often are used in such number as to create an eyesore. There are options for posting temporary prices, sales, etc., in the form of temporary sign permits for banners or portable signs. 2. Allow them without regulation. • The reasoning here would be that these signs, while there may be many of them on a site, are small and do not constitute enough of a visual blight to worry about. • 3. Regulate the amount of such signage on a property. Theoretically, this could done be by total square footage or by the number of such signs. However, the difficulty in enforcing such requirements is obvious — imagine measuring the size of all such signs on a property and calculating the total. The next day, three of the six cardboard signs may change. Counting the number of them is the other option, but the same difficulties arise. Staff would recommend either banning these signs or allowing them without permits. Enforcement: We intend to prepare an ordinance amendment that addresses all the temporary signage issues as agreed upon by the P& Z. In response to the request from the P & Z, the Building Official has been instructed to enforce the existing ordinance in the interim. Another set of letters went out recently. RECOMMENDATION Arrive at agreement on: (a) pennants, and; (b) miscellaneous signs.