Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/13/2005 P&Z Packet• • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 9, 2005 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Rezone to GB — General Business, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and Allocation of Commercial MUSA for a five -lot commercial development named Apollo Landing, Equinox Development LLP, 540 Lilac Street — Paul Bengtson B. PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow for an awning at Rehbein Transit, 6298 Hodgson Road — Paul Bengtson C. PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat for expansion of Fairview Lino Lakes Clinic, 7455 Village Drive — Paul Bengtson D. PUBLIC HEARING for a Preliminary Plat for an 18 -lot single- family residential development named Marshan Meadows, 7364 Lake Drive — Jeff Smyser VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. AUAR Update B. Temporary Signs VII. ADJOURN • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT : March 9, 2005 . 6:33 P.M. : 10:47 P.M. : Hyden, Laden, Nelson; Pogalz, Rafferty, Root, and Tralle. : None. : Jeff Smyser; James Studenski; and Paul Bengtson I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Rafferty called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:33 p.m., March 9, 2005. Mayor Bergeson swore in Commissioners Robert Nelson and Perry Laden. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 9, 2005 Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to approve the February 9, 2005 Minutes and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Rafferty declared Open Mike open at 6:38 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:39 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 6 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, for a Preliminary Plat for Marshan Lakeview, James Funkhouser, 595 Marshan Lane DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 2 Staff stated applicant had requested approval of a single - family residential development entitled Marshan Lakeview. The subject property is made up of two lots located at the end of Marshan Lane and is currently developed with one single - family dwelling. The applicant is proposing to divide the 121,374 square foot lot into four lots of 35,088 square feet, 11,784 square feet, 15,419 square feet and approximately 42,000 square feet. The existing single - family dwelling will remain on the largest lot. Also depicted on the preliminary plat are a couple of outlots that were created as part of the Marshan Estates plat. These outlots will combine into the adjacent properties as part of this proposed plat. At the February 9, 2005 meeting the applicant requested that this proposal be continued to a future meeting so that he could thoroughly review the plans and determine if an alternative existed that could potentially save more of the significant trees on the site. Since that time, the applicant has decided that this is the best feasible layout and wishes to proceed with the application. Staff has met with the applicant to define a couple of possibilities that would potentially save some significant trees or allow for a greater buffer between the new lots and main drive for the City's Legacy project which will be a significant traffic generator. Staff feels very comfortable continuing to work with the applicant to clearly define the location of the cul -de -sac bulb and drainage for the lots prior to the City Council reviewing the application. He presented staffs analysis and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. All lots created by the plat shall connect to City sanitary sewer and water; assessments will be recorded with the final plat. 2. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 3. Park dedication shall be paid in accordance with City policies. 4. The southern portion of Lot 1, Block 2 should be separated into another lot for donation to the County. Said lot must be subsequently combined with the adjacent County parcel. 5. The applicant shall continue to work with City staff to determine the best possible location for the cul -de -sac within the right of way, and the optimal drainage for the rear of Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1. Mr. Laden asked if the emergency access would remain where it was. Mr. Bengtson replied it would remain, but probably not in the exact alignment where it was now. Mr. Laden expressed concern that residents would use the emergency access road as a pedestrian access. Mr. Bengtson replied that was not something they had discussed and the intention was only for emergency access and not a public acces .s, but it may serve as that at this time just because it was out there. Mr. Laden asked if they should look at a trail or path in this area to access the Legacy Woods. Mr. Bengtson replied staff would look at that. DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 3 110 Mr. Smyser noted there was a path in existence and a trail would be put in piece by piece down Lake Drive. Chair Rafferty reopened the public hearing at 6:53 p.m. Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Mr. Funkhouser stated he did not intend to donate the wetland property to the County as stated in staff s report. He indicated there were many fees involved and he could not donate this. Mr. Bengtson replied they would need to work with the County on this prior to the approval of the plat. Chair Rafferty asked if they should move forward with this and make sure things are taken care of with the County prior to the Council meeting. Mr. Bengtson replied they were not saying he had to give this to the County and that was only a recommendation, but this would be a good use of that property. However, he acknowledged there would be an expense involved in doing that. He stated the Commission could approve this removing that condition. Chair Rafferty asked if Mr. Funkhouser was in agreement with all of the conditions, with the exception of Condition 4. Mr. Funkhouser replied he was in agreement. Chair Rafferty noted Mr. Funkhouser had brought up a very good concern and he asked if he would be open to allowing this to be continued for another month in an attempt to get this worked out. Mr. Funkhouser replied he would not oppose continuing this. Mr. Smyser stated the plat as it was presented was acceptable and an applicant could not be required to give land away to the County, but they encouraged him to look at this. He recommended they approve this tonight and let staff work on the land issue. He noted the land issue would not make any difference to this plat. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this application to come forward. There were no further comments. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend Preliminary Plat for Marshan Lakeview, James Funkhouser, 595 Marshan Lane subject to the conditions as noted in staff's March 9, 2005 report with amending Condition 4 that applicant and staff would look into the disposition of the wetland portion of Lot 1, Block 2 of this and was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 6 -0. • B. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, for Circle Pines Registered Land Survey for Lots 11 and 12, Block 8, and Lots 9 -14, Block 10, Lexington Park Lakeview Chair Rafferty reopened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 4 Staff stated the City of Circle Pines wishes to acquire a small area of land on the south side of North Road. This area is covered by county road easement for Lake Drive. Over time, the easements in this area became complex. Circle Pines wants to clear up the easement definitions to facilitate their property acquisition efforts. A Registered Land Survey (RLS) is a common means of accomplishing this. The RLS is similar to a plat and must be processed like a plat. The entire area proposed for the RLS is within Lino Lakes, so Lino Lakes must review it. He noted the P &Z opened the public hearing at the February 9 meeting and continued it to allow for the gathering of additional information to address some unresolved issues. Staff presented their analysis and recommended approval of the proposed Registered Land Survey. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this proposal to come forward. There were no comments made. Mr. Root made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend Circle Pines Registered Land Survey for Lots 11 and 12, Block 8, and Lots 9 -14, Block 10, Lexington Park Lakeview subject to the conditions as noted in staff's March 9, 2005 report and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 -0. C. PUBLIC HEARING, for a Rezone to GB — General Business, Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and Allocation of Commercial MUSA for a five -lot commercial development named Apollo Landing, Equinox Development LLP, 540 Lilac Street Chair Rafferty excused himself from this item and passed the chair to Mr. Tralle. Staff stated applicant is proposing a five -lot commercial subdivision on property currently adressed as 540 Lilac Drive. The application submitted includes a Rezoning to GB (General Business), a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Planned Unit Development, a Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and allocation of MUSA reserve. He noted the main occupant of the site will be an 80 room hotel proposed for Lot 1 of the Plat. The development also includes a restaurant pad on Lot 5, and retail /commercial pads on Lots 2, 3, and 4. Staff presented their analysis and recommended continuing the public hearing. DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 5 Mr. Root noted it appeared the only item that was not met in the General Business Zone was the multiple lots. Mr. Bengtson replied that was the only standard at this point they were not meeting. Mr. Root asked if there would be additional landscaping added. Mr. Bengtson replied the General Business Zoning did have specific requirement regarding screening. But beyond that, the requirements at this point listed out the types of trees, but it was not specific about the placement of the landscaping materials on the site. With a PUD, the intent was to have the entire site well landscaped and designed and through the design standards they could address a lot of the landscaping issues. But until the applicant came in and designed the building, it would be difficult to design the landscaping next to the building. Mr. Root asked why they couldn't have a landscaping plan because this was in the General Business Zoning. He noted they would want additional landscaping along the residential side. He stated there were many unanswered questions, but he would like to see a more definitive landscaping plan. Mr. Laden asked if they would be working with the standards in the surveying company's letter. Mr. Bengtson replied they had received another submittal today with more specific design standards, but staff had not had the opportunity to review it yet. He stated staff would continue to work on the design standards. Mr. Laden asked if it would be typical to have a staff member and/or P &Z member on the Architectural Control Design Committee. Mr. Smyser replied typically the City would not be a part of the design boards, but it was a possibility. He noted what had been done in the past was to establish what the requirements are and if applicant wanted to have a review board, that was fine, but the City would review and approve things on its own. Mr. Laden inquired about the ULI numbers for the parking. He asked if it was considered that a certain percentage of the restaurant would also be patrons of the hotel and therefore did not need two parking spots. Mr. Laden asked if there were standards that would look at the shared development as a whole, which could reduce parking. Mr. Smyser replied that's the point of the shared parking analysis. Looking at the individual uses, during certain times of the day, it had been determined how much of the maximum parking would be needed. Mr. Laden inquired about the elevation. He asked if it was 55' or 45'. Mr. Bengtson replied the maximum standard was 45 feet and the majority of the building would be conforming to that. They were proposing a 10 foot embellishment on the building, which would need to be approved or denied by the P &Z Board. Vice Chair Tralle opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. • Vice Chair Tralle invited applicant to come forward. Craig Piette, 425 Arrowhead Drive, thanked Mr. Rafferty for excusing himself. He asked if the Board had any questions. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 6 Mr. Laden asked if the number of parking on the current plan was reflective of the maximum parking required or the reduced parking number. Mr. Piette replied they had an excess of 16 or 17 parking spaces at the present time. He noted when possible, they would convert those to pervious surface when they had extra parking. Mr. Laden asked if they were in favor of reducing parking. Mr. Piette replied they were planning on reducing the parking and they were willing to work with staff on this. Mr. Pogalz asked what was their timeline for securing a flag for the hotel. Mr. Piette replied the proprietary information with respect to the hotel flags would remain proprietary until the rezoning was approved. He noted there were four well known flags that were interested and immediately upon rezoning they would have a flag for the hotel. He stated this would be a four story hotel to accommodate an 80 room hotel, which was their target. He stated they were very close to almost everything and City staff needed the time to review this. Mr. Hayden asked if they had held any neighborhood meetings. Mr. Piette replied he had personally distributed small packets to the residents and businesses showing the preliminary plat, narrative, and a brief summary of what they were going to do. He noted they had received only one call. Mr. Hayden asked if they had held a neighborhood meeting. Mr. Piette replied they had not held a meeting, but they were being proactive by distributing the packets. Vice Chair Tralle asked if the restaurant would be a chain restaurant. Mr. Piette replied they were intending to have an upscale, sit -down restaurant with perhaps a lounge. He indicated they would not put in a fast food restaurant. He stated he was a member of this community and he wanted to have a good development that the City could be proud of for years to come. Vice Chair Tralle invited anyone for or against this proposal to come forward. Dave Swanson, 501 Lilac, stated his back yard would back up to where the hotel would be. He indicated he was in favor of the development and noted he was going to sell his property, but asked that everything be tied together if his property sold. He noted this would be an advantage to the City to have this as one development. He indicated he wanted to leave more options open for them when his land sold. He asked them to consider the building of a road access for the future so his land is not landlocked. Mr. Nelson asked if he had any contact with the developer. Mr. Swanson stated he had spoken with them, but he had not met with them. He noted they knew his land was for sale. Mr. Piette stated in speaking with City staff it was in fact discussed that perhaps at some point in the future there would perhaps be a need for Mr. Swanson's lot. However, currently those lots were guided in the Comprehensive Plan for industrial use. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 7 Mr. Root asked if they were in agreement to language in the PUD if this was acceptable to be in the General Business District, would they agree to a drive access. Mr. Piette replied it would not be much of a problem to guide this property to General Business District, but to answer his question, he did not have an answer, but they would be in agreement to such a drive access. Mr. Tralle asked what would happen with the silo. Mr. Piette replied the silo was dangerously close to collapsing, but they could take portions of it and put a smaller scale of it somewhere if the City wanted to retain some of the rural feel. He noted the lid was completely rotted through and the mortar was no good. He indicated he would not recommend anyone going into it. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to continue the public hearing and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. Vice Chair Tralle turned the meeting back over to Chair Rafferty. D. Final Plat for Vaughan Addition Staff stated applicant had requested approval of a five lot single - family residential subdivision entitled Vaughan Addition. The subject property is located on the south side of Birch Street approximately 2,180 feet east of Ware Road. Staff indicated the final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City council on January 10, 2005. The title commitment for the property and final plat have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. As required under the conditions of preliminary plat approval, the applicant has submitted a Rice Creek Watershed permit. Another condition of approval requires that right of access be granted to Anoka County. This is not currently shown on the final plat; but will be required prior to the item being scheduled for the City Council. All other conditions of approval will be met with building permit review of the subdivision or through the development contract between the applicant and the City that is still being developed. Staff recommended approval of the final plat for Vaughan Addition. Mr. Laden asked if there were a lot of engineering issues for this to be going to final plat. Mr. Smyser noted at this point of the process, they usually did not put in the engineering review and they were getting down to a level of detail that usually the P &Z did not deal with. He noted it was not unusual to have these types of engineering comments. Mr. Nelson made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Final Plat for Vaughan Addition and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 5 -1 (Mr. Laden opposed). E. Final Plat for West Shadow Ponds 2 "d Addition Staff stated applicant was requesting approval of a two single- family residential subdivision entitled West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition. The subject property is located adjacent to the northwest corner of 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake Drive. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 8 Staff noted the final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on October 11, 2004. The title commitment for the property and final plat have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. All conditions of approval will be met with building permit review of the subdivision or through the development contract between the applicant and the City that is still being developed. Staff recommended approval of the Final Plat for West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Final Plat for West Shadow Ponds 2nd Addition and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. AUAR Update — Development Scenarios Mr. Smyser updated the Board on the AUAR development scenarios. Chair Rafferty recessed the meeting at 8:53 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:02 p.m. B. Temporary Signs Mr. Smyser stated the P &Z had been discussing the issue of temporary signage since January 2003. The purpose is to prepare an amendment to the sign ordinance to clearly address the issues involved. Progress has been made agreeing on how to regulate portable signs and banners. Several other temporary signage issues still remain before an ordinance amendment is prepared. Mr. Smyser asked if the Board wanted to allow pennants /stringers, or should they be subject to a permit. Mr. Nelson stated he was torn about this and he could see this from both sides. Mr. Laden stated he believed they should be defined as a temporary sign and meet the rules for a temporary sign. Mr. Root stated he believed they should not be banned all together because they were meant to attract attention for a special event. He believed they should be looked at as temporary signage. Chair Rafferty invited the public to make comment. Chad Wagner, 7630 Appaloosa Lane, 818 Lois Lane, Millers on Main - Lake Drive, stated he had come before the Board previously to discuss this issue and in discussing the banners, some of the ideas that were brought up was that the banners would be allowed as long as they were attached to the building and be maintained and not be up for more than 30 days at a time. He indicated he had a concern that as a small business, banners were a major part of their advertising and he was requesting a compromise. He stated taking the DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 9 banners away would hurt the small businesses significantly. He felt the banners they put up were professional banners and each banner cost a couple hundred dollars and he did not believe they were an eyesore to the community. He noted with a 30 day limit, the banners would not get torn or dirty. Chair Rafferty asked if he had received anything from a building official regarding an existing sign ordinance. Mr. Wagner replied he had. Jason Anderson, 6872 Sunrise, US Bank - 7984 Lake Drive, stated they had a unique situation with their branch in that the back part of their building faced Lake Drive. He stated there was a brick wall that he had installed hooks on where they advertised their special promotions. He noted they had tried newspaper advertising and they received very little response to that and the only advertising that worked was their temporary signage and banners on their building. He stated he had put one of those signs out and he had received a letter indicating they had to purchase a permit for the sign and when he went in to get the permit, he was informed he could not get one because he was not having a special event and the permits were for special events only and he was asked to remove the sign. He stated he tried to be in compliance but was told he could not get a permit and this was frustrating for him. He asked the Board to take his concerns into consideration. Bill Mayhe, 6810 Lake Drive, Trappers Grill, stated they previously had banners up which they took down when they received a letter from the City. He noted when they took down their banners, he noticed a decrease in phone calls regarding his specials. He indicated they also had a marquee, but it was important that they were allowed to use banners in addition to the marquee. Katie Allen, 3890 88th Court NE, stated she opened up a new business in Spirit Hills Mall 8 months ago. She indicated she worked 13 hours a day and did not draw a salary. She noted temporary signage was very important for a small business. She indicated when she had banners up, her business increased, but when she did not have the signs up, her business paid the price for it and she could not afford this. She stated she would be out of business soon if she was not allowed to put up temporary signage. She noted signage was important to keep the business in the eyes of the citizens. She stated her business was Allure Salon. She noted the temporary signs made a huge difference to her business. She stated she had not received any letters from the City with respect to her signage. She noted Spirit Hills was a new mall and they had the same problem with being backward onto Birch Street. She stated they had no way to let people know who was in that mall without being able to be allowed temporary signage. She indicated she had previously put out signage, but the signs disappeared. She was not sure who took the signs. She stated if all of the big businesses, builders, and realtors were allowed to have signs up, but the small businesses were not, she was not in favor of this. She asked why the City was not supporting the smaller business owner. She noted one sign permit for $25.00 for 17 days was not sufficient. She indicated when a new business came into a community, people did not know the business was there without signage. She indicated a small business could not survive in Lino Lakes without signage. She asked the Board to help the small business owner. Chair Rafferty noted these ordinances would be coming up also. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 10 Carmen Schmidt, 3895 86th Lane, Circle Pines, Taco Palace Restaurant — 730 Apollo Drive, stated her restaurant was not within the site lines of Lake Drive and therefore people did not know her business was there. She noted she had placed temporary signage along Lake Drive, which had been taken down by the City. She noted the signs were home made because she could not afford professional signage. She indicated she had been in business for 18 months and was not taking a salary. She noted she had advertised in the Quad with no success. She noted when she had banners out, her business increased significantly. She understood the City's concerns about maintaining the banners. She stated she did not mind paying $25.00 for a permit for a banner, but 17 days per quarter was not sufficient. She noted there were many holidays grouped together that they would have specials for and they could not advertise those specials, except once a quarter. She stated the maintenance department continuously checked banners and signs all of the time in the City. She understood the City's concern about having cluttering with the signage, but if the small business was not allowed the temporary signage, they could not survive. She noted she could not afford to go to Anoka County and pay $350.00 to get the names of residents, as well as paying for a flyer and mailing the notices. She stated the simplest way for her to advertise was with banners. She indicated she did not mind paying the $25.00 with a time limit, as long as the time limit was reasonable. She indicated if people did not see the signage, they forgot the business was there. Jim Gemlo, 1750 Wood Meadow Lane, representing the Legacy Dry Cleaning opening in Spirit Hills next week, stated they are the first new drycleaner in the metro area that did cleaning onsite. He indicated a streamer without words might not say anything, but it did say to look here. He noted if the streamers got someone's attention even for a short period of time, it was to businesses advantage. He asked for some reasonableness that would be a benefit to the business owners and not detract from the beauty of the City. He asked why was it okay for people to put up For Sale signs and garage sale signs for free while charging the businesses $25.00 for a sign. He asked why was it not required that the realtors and garage sale signs also be charged. He noted signage was a vital piece of their business and he requested they work together and be reasonable on signage. He asked the City also not determine what was a special event at his business. He stated he should just be able to get a permit without having to run a special. Jim Szyplinski, Mansetti's, 6511 Ware Road, stated he agreed the signage problems are a disaster, but the signs do matter to the survival of the businesses. He asked why couldn't they have permanent signage on the road that indicated where Spirit Hills Mall was. He stated the issue was not just banners, but it was signage in general. He noted Spirit Hills Mall was facing backwards to Birch and if he would have realized this at the time, he would not have built there. He indicated he spent approximately $7,000 per month on advertising, but people still did not know they existed. He asked without banners how are they suppose to let the residents know where the small businesses in the City were located. He indicated flyers, newspaper, and television advertising were not working. He suggested they have some street signage and he was willing to pay for it. He stated he was open to suggestions, but the small business owner needed help from the City. He stated he was willing to put up City approved signs and pay a permit fee, but he needed to advertise his business. He asked where else should they be advertising. He noted he also had not received a salary since he opened. He stated the smaller businesses generated DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 11 taxes and they were looking for help with this issue. He agreed the banners looked bad if they were not properly maintained and asked they come up with a solution for the small business being allowed to advertise. He stated he did not agree that builders were allowed to put out signs, but the small business owner was not allowed to put out signs. He acknowledged this was a tough issue. He stated he had not received a letter from the City. Dave Bauer, 566 Aqua Circle, President of Lino Lake Junior Chamber of Commerce, asked they also consider not - for - profit groups in this discussion. He noted they did not have their own property, but a business might limit their willingness to host an event for them if they were not allowed to advertise the event. He stated to pay a $25.00 permit fee would also hurt their income. Joelle Roberts, 6624 Ruffed Grouse Road, noted she did not own a business, but was a member of the community. She stated she could not believe this was an issue and that the small business owner should be allowed to put up signs and banners. She noted she did not have time to go through all of the flyers and newspapers she received and she relied on the banners to show where the businesses are. She stated she worked for a sign company and she understood that the City wanted the signage to be professional looking. Steve Bergman, Eagle Liquor and Tobacco, stated the signs helped his business to promote a beer of the month and having signs out made a huge difference for his business. He stated he had received a letter from the City regarding his signage. Tim Goertz, Spirit Hills Wine and Liquor, stated he was in agreement with the previous comments made. He stated whatever was decided needed to be enforced equally. Katie Allen asked how many of the small businesses had gone under in the past couple of years because banner and temporary signage was not allowed. Mr. Pogalz stated he was glad the business owners showed up to this meeting. He indicated they were going to work with the business owners. Chair Rafferty stated part of the reason they were having this discussion tonight was to come to some conclusions that they could give to the Council as recommendations. He noted they had been dealing with this issue for two plus years and it had been very frustrating to not have business input. However, he acknowledged many of the businesses in attendance tonight were not in business two years ago. He noted the reason they were looking at this was because the signage was a problem as an eye sore. Mr. Tralle stated they had two meetings where 32 businesses were invited and only two small business owners showed up as well as a couple of realtors. He stated they had discussed many different types of signage. He noted they finally had the businesses attention. He indicated they were not anti- business, but it was frustrating that it took two years to get the businesses attention to the signage problems they were having. He noted now was the time to start working on this with the businesses. He stated they did not know what the businesses needs were because nobody came and told them. He indicated he now understood how important banners were, which he did not understand before this DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 12 meeting. He stated he was willing to work with the business owners and he was glad to see so many business owners finally show up at a meeting. Mr. Nelson asked if they had discussed the "A" frame signs. He asked if the businesses wanted to use those types of signs. One of the business owners noted those types of signs fell over easily and they were expensive. Joelle Roberts showed a sample of a metal sign as a possible solution. She stated it was important that temporary signage be allowed on corners. Mr. Hyden asked how would they regulate whose signage was up on what corner. He expressed concern about too many signs on corners. He asked how would they limit where the businesses could place signs. Katie Allen stated there were other issues such as putting a billboard type of a sign on private property where the owner had agreed to rent the space, but they have been told by the City that was not allowed. Chair Rafferty asked if they had a monument sign. Katie Allen acknowledged they did, but noted the problem with the monument sign was that it was only seen from Birch Street and not Lake Drive. She stated a sign on Lake Drive would let people know where they were located. She stated they were willing to build any type of sign the City would allow them to build. Chair Rafferty noted it was up to the business owners to come up with a sign they wanted to propose to the City and their discussion tonight was to deal with banners and streamers only. Katie Allen stated they needed to change the law that said they could not rent permanent signage from an individual owner. She noted they did not know how to change the law. Jim Szyplinski, Mansetti's, stated he wanted flat, metal signs along the roadway and get rid of the banner signage. He stated he would want a sign at the intersection of Birch and Lake Drive and he was willing to pay for this type of signage. Chad Wagner, Millers on Main, stated the types of signs on the freeways they were talking about were $1,500 and then $400 per quarter. He believed there was a lack of communication and procedure in notifying the businesses about the sign meetings. He noted he had not been contacted or seen anything about this issue from the last time he was at one of these meetings. He stated if there was better communication, there might have been better turnout. He indicated he personally wanted to keep banners on his building and on his site. He noted he had contacted many of the business owners in attendance tonight personally to inform them of this meeting and the impact it would have on their businesses. He stated he had not received any notices of the meetings, except by an email which he received this past Monday. Chair Rafferty noted one of the biggest dilemmas they faced was that they were trying to find a medium to control the signage and yet make both the businesses and the City happy. He noted there had to be some controls put in place and the controls had to be DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 13 equitable. He stated staff did not have the resources to be dealing with sign enforcement. He stated they were trying to find a way to put checks and balances in place. He noted the reason they chose a Friday with 17 days was to allow banners for three weekends in a row. He stated they were not intending on hurting the businesses, but they needed to put some sound solutions on the signage problems and make a recommendation to Council. Mr. Wagner indicated it would make more sense to have the permits be issued for one month. He noted these Ordinances might scare away some of the small businesses because they were not allowed to advertise. He appreciated the time the Board put into this. Mr. Tralle stated the businesses needed to get together and have a meeting to come up with what was absolutely needed with respect to signage. He noted the Board had done a lot of work and now they needed the businesses to do some work on their part. He stated he did not like the trashy looks of signs and it was inexcusable to have the banners looking bad, but he now understood that the banners were a vital part of the small business. He asked the business owners to get them organized and come back with some suggestions. He stated he was willing to work with the businesses and he had changed his opinion about banners with the comments made tonight as long as the banners were maintained. Mr. Pogalz agreed with Mr. Tralle's comments. Chair Rafferty asked what were they doing tonight. Mr. Tralle stated he did not want to talk any further about the banners and stringers until the business owners had the opportunity to come back with their suggestions. Mr. Pogalz concurred. He noted they now had the business owners' attention and it would be misguided to not address their concerns. The remainder of the Board concurred. Chair Rafferty noted he was not interested in looking at banners again, but he believed the rest of the Board wanted review them again. He noted they had worked very hard on trying to make some steps and move forward and to address banners again was a step in the wrong direction. Mr. Laden agreed, but noted that banners were brought up as a major topic and he wanted to share with the business owners where the Board was with banners. Jim Gemlo asked how many businesses were in the City two years ago versus how many businesses were in the City now. He stated to not go back was jumping the gun considering how many more businesses were now in the City and he asked them to reconsider this. Mr. Tralle stated he was willing to go back and re -look at this because of what he heard tonight, but if the business owners were not willing to meet and help the Board with this, he would not be willing to look at this again. He indicated he has been one of the biggest opponents of banners, but he wanted to see the businesses succeed. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board March 9, 2005 Page 14 Katie Allen asked how did they want this presented to the Board as a group. She stated they were willing to do this. Mr. Tralle stated they needed come up with ideas of how they wanted to display their banners, regulations they could live with as to where they could be placed, etc. Katie Allen asked how did they want this presented to them. Mr. Smyser stated the business owners needed to get together and get him a list of what would and would not work for their businesses. He indicated billboards were probably a steep uphill battle for them in this community and the City was not open to billboard advertising. He stated the City Council ultimately had the power to change this, but it was something that would need to be worked through the process. With respect to the permanent road signage, MnDOT owned the freeways and if MnDOT wanted to sell sign space in their right -of- way they could do that. However, the roads they were talking about were Anoka County roads and the City could not give them permission to put signs on the Anoka County roads. Katie Allen asked how come the City took down their signs on Anoka County roads. Mr. Smyser replied the City did not allow this type of advertising. Mr. Tralle stated he proposed the businesses come back to them with what they needed for portable signs and banners and they would revisit it. He noted if this was not done, the Board would stick with what they had. Chair Rafferty asked when they should come back. Jim Szyplinski, Mansettis, proposed in two weeks they would get something to Mr. Smyser and the business owners would elect a person who would be their spokesperson. He indicated they would come back as a group at a time that was convenient for the Board. Mr. Pogalz recommended they get as many businesses involved as they could. C. GTS Training Mr. Smyser summarized the GTS Training and noted if any of the Board members wanted to attend any of the workshops to let Dawn know. He recommended the new Boardmembers attend the basic courses for the fundamentals if they were interested. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 10:47 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • AGENDA ITEM V.A. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: April 13, 2005 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING Rezone to GB (General Business) Conditional Use Permit to allow a PUD (Planned Unit Development) Development Stage Plan / Preliminary Plat Allocation of MUSA reserve Apollo Landing BACKGROUND Equinox Development is proposing a 5 lot commercial subdivision on property located at 540 Lilac Drive. The application submitted includes a Rezoning to GB (General Business), a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Planned Unit Development, a Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and allocation of commercial MUSA reserve. he main occupant of the site will be an 80 room hotel proposed for Lot 1 of the Plat. The development also includes a restaurant pad on lot 5, and retail /commercial pads on lots 2, 3, and 4. At the March 9, 2005 meeting the Planning and Zoning Board voted to continue this item so staff could work with the applicant to address outstanding issues. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Vacant Commercial Rural North Single Family Residential Industrial Rural South Apollo Drive, Industrial Commercial General Business East Vacant Commercial Rural West Single Family Residential Cemetery Industrial Rural General Industrial The comprehensive plan guides the site for Commercial land use. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) Mowth area and a portion is within the existing MUSA boundary. Public water and sanitary sewer are available W&fithin the Apollo Drive right -of -way. Apollo Landing, page 2 tanned Unit Development The proposed commercial center will include five lots on which multiple buildings will be potentially built. Since each lot will not have street frontage a Planned Unit Development is necessary. In the case of a commercial development the procedure for doing a Planned Unit Development is through a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant is proposing to rezone the site to GB (General Business); however through the Planned Unit Development those base standards can be modified. Within each of the following development standards topics, the proposed standards will be discussed along with the base GB (General Business) zoning district standards, and of course recommendations from staff. Setback Standards The proposed setbacks are more restrictive than the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore acceptable to staff. Buildings General Business Proposed Arterial Street 40 feet 105 Feet Side Yard 10 feet 30 feet Rear Yard 30 feet 40 feet The proposed setbacks are more restrictive than the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore acceptable to staff. The proposed setbacks for parking are equal to or more restrictive than the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore acceptable to staff. All signage will be required to be setback the typical 5 feet from any property line. This will be included in the architectural design standards for the site. Lot Sizes The Planned Unit Development allows deviation from strict provision of the zoning code related to lot area and width. Each lot is designed to accommodate a building pad and sufficient parking to serve the intended use of the lot. The proposed lot areas and widths are in conformance with the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore appropriate. Architectural Design Standards The enclosed design standards address buildings, landscaping, signage, lighting, and site maintenance by an association. Staff has proposed some revisions to the submitted document. Strikeout text represents text to be eleted; underlining represents text to be added. Marks in the margins indicate where revisions were made. ost are for clarification purposes, but there are a few significant changes. Parking Lot General Business Proposed Arterial Street 15 feet 83 feet Side Yard 10 feet 10 feet Rear Yard 10 feet 10 feet The proposed setbacks for parking are equal to or more restrictive than the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore acceptable to staff. All signage will be required to be setback the typical 5 feet from any property line. This will be included in the architectural design standards for the site. Lot Sizes The Planned Unit Development allows deviation from strict provision of the zoning code related to lot area and width. Each lot is designed to accommodate a building pad and sufficient parking to serve the intended use of the lot. The proposed lot areas and widths are in conformance with the GB (General Business) zoning district, and are therefore appropriate. Architectural Design Standards The enclosed design standards address buildings, landscaping, signage, lighting, and site maintenance by an association. Staff has proposed some revisions to the submitted document. Strikeout text represents text to be eleted; underlining represents text to be added. Marks in the margins indicate where revisions were made. ost are for clarification purposes, but there are a few significant changes. Apollo Landing, page 3 •he proposed monument sign is quite large: 9' x 12'. The pylon sign has area at its base that can provide site identification. Two large structures at the entrance are unnecessary and obstruct vision. Staff recommends no monument sign. As to lighting, staff recommends restricting the accent flood light to landscape features only. Flood lights on buildings could create too much reflected "glow" for neighboring residents. Building Materials/ Elevations The elevation that was submitted with this application is strictly an artist's rendering of what a hotel built to the height standards of the zoning district, and to the commercial design standards of the city zoning code would look like. It is in no way an architectural elevation depicting exactly what will be built on site. The architectural elevations are intellectual property of the different hotel chains and since a specific user has not been tabbed to take the hotel location final architectural elevations are not available at this time. However, as a part of the Planned Unit Development rezoning request, architectural design standards must be established to dictate the aesthetics of the buildings eventually built on this site. Staff has worked closely with the applicant to develop architectural design standards that are acceptable to the developer as well as enforceable by the City of Lino Lakes. Building Height gain, the final occupant of the hotel, and therefore the final design of that building can not be verified at this MIffme. As such it is important that any approval of this project establish a firm height limitation. Staff would recommend the limitation normally associated with the GB (General Business) zoning district. According to the Zoning Ordinance, no building within the GB (General Business) Zoning District may exceed 45 feet in height. Landscaping In accordance with the Screening requirements of the zoning ordinance screening is required along the boundary of the residential property adjacent to this commercial use. Either a green belt with 80% opacity, six feet in height must be provided, or alternatively a solid screening fence six feet in height. The plans as submitted provide a six -foot fence augmented with some additional landscaping. The remainder of the landscaping on site looks rather minimal, but that is based on the lack of definitive users and building size /layout for the site. As each site is designed with the final user the landscaping would be designed to work with the layout. However, again the architectural design standards would be able to spell out the types of allowable plant materials. This would create the cohesiveness desired. As requested by staff, additional landscape islands have been added to the parking area for lots 2, 3, and 4. • Apollo Landing, page 4 reen Area The GB (General Business) zoning district requires that impervious surface coverage not exceed 75 %. The submitted plans currently show the property at approximately 70.5% impervious surface coverage, well within the limitations of the zoning district. Revisions to the plans depicting additional landscape islands in the parking area shared by lots 2, 3, and 4 further reduces that percentage. Parking The parking analysis is attached to the end of this report. It clearly shows that the site is providing parking at or above the requirements of the zoning ordinance. The lack of defined tenants for the retail /commercial /office portions of the site makes the reduction of parking a difficult task to undertake. City staff certainly does not want to eliminate parking which then causes the tenant mix allowed on the site to be limited. With the parking provided a variety of uses (as allowed within the zoning district) can be provided for with the parking depicted on the site plan. Originally the applicant was proposing to use some parking spaces be eliminated in favor of trash enclosures, though staff is recommending that trash storage be seamlessly integrated into the designs of the building. Recommendations from the Environmental Board as well as city staff regarding increased landscaping in the parking area shared by lots 2, 3, and 4 have been implemented without reducing the parking provided on site. Access /Circulation , ccess to the site is via an entry /exit driveway directly from Apollo Drive. As indicated in the City Engineer's emorandum, approval for this access must be obtained from Anoka County. The applicant has submitted a separate application to Anoka County; however comments have not been made available at the time of this report. Lighting The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application includes the lighting for the entry drive and the hotel property, and meets city standards. Staff is recommending a condition requiring all future development to include a photometric lighting plan of the entire site that depicts all development so a comprehensive review can be completed with each building. Exhibits for the lighting fixtures are included in the architectural design standards for the project. Signage As the applicant is proposing multi- tenant buildings, and the architectural design standards for the site are designed to create a cohesive design throughout the entire commercial center. The architectural design standards also include the sign plan for the development. • Apollo Landing, page 5 *ash / Mechanical Equipment The site plans submitted with this application do not clearly depict a location for trash enclosures. However, in meetings held between city staff and the developer, the developer agreed to include specific language within the architectural design standards that would address this issue. Trash enclosures will be required to be built into the buildings with roll up (garage) doors for access. This will eliminate the need for the accessory trash enclosures that detract from the aesthetics of the entire site. Mechanical equipment will need to be completely screened from the view of the right of way and the neighboring properties. The six foot high fence proposed around the majority of the property should do this rather effectively, with the exception of the view from Apollo Drive. All mechanical equipment and utility boxes located on the ground should be placed to be visible only from within the center, or should be effectively screened by either screen walls or appropriate landscaping materials. All roof mounted mechanical equipment should be architecturally screened by the roof structure or parapet walls as required by the zoning code. Utilities Water and Sanitary sewer service are available within the Apollo Drive right -of -way. Revisions to the Preliminary Plat drawing depict the correct location of the tie in to the municipal sewer system, thus any questions regarding easements on the neighboring property have been eliminated. question still exists as to the size of service that will be required to serve the entire site, however the City Engineer feels comfortable proceeding with the application and determining that prior to construction as it has little impact on anything except the cost of the development. Stormwater management The City Engineer has reviewed the submitted grading and drainage plan, and his memorandum is attached to this report. Evidence has been submitted to show that the existing wells for the residential properties to the north are well outside of the required setbacks from drainage ponds. The plan is subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. The city has received a copy of the Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes from the Watershed District. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the February 23, 2005 regular meeting. There recommendations were numerous and are attached to this report. OPTIONS 1. Continue the public hearing. 2. Deny the project. 3. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: • Apollo Landing, page 6 1. By -laws for the developments association must be submitted for review and approval by city staff prior to the final plat being reviewed by the city council. These by -laws must include a joint access /shared parking agreement for the entire site. 2. The architectural design standards approved as a part of this application must be supplied to each incoming tenant upon signature of a lease. 3. The architectural design standards required to be approved by the City Council as part of any Planned Unit Development can not be modified unless reviewed and approved by the City Council. 4. A development agreement must be executed between the developer and the city prior to the execution of a final plat for the site. 5. Appropriate drainage and utility easements must be shown on the final plat. 6. The proposed development is subject to Anoka County Highway Department requirements, review, and approval. 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits for each building city staff must review and approve a photometric lighting plan of the entire site including all previous construction on the site. 8. Prior to the issuance of building permits for each building city staff must review and approve a landscaping plan of the entire site including all previous construction on the site. ATTACHMENTS 1. Parking Analysis 2. Architectural Design Standards revised April 8, 2005. 3. City Engineer's memorandum dated April 8, 2005. 4. Environmental Board memorandum from February 23, 2005 meeting. 5. Lighting Plan and Cut Sheets received February 28, 2005. 6. Elevation received January 10, 2005. 7. Apollo Landing Plan Set received January 10, 2005. 8. Revised Preliminary Plat and Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control Plan received April 4, 2005. • a) E 0) Y ca Y a) C1) E O 0 LO CO d O O CO L0 CO O (A a O O O 0 0) (O O (O G. O O 0 O 0 CO 10 'd O O O O 10 0 LO E a O LO (V O O CO L0 (O 0 (A d O O N 10 O O 0 L() O O O 0 O LO 10 O (V U) O O O E O O (/) O O O O restaurant O CO (A CO N M CV CO co (V (O M N 0) CO (0 (V N 0) a) L a) E E J 0 N R m N L (0 a O z N (0 0) CD m O CO 0) CO (V ti CO CV O O CO N O CV O CO O (O (0 co 0) W O O O E O O O O O (0 N )) O ((00 CO (n (1) Cn (0 O N O O CV O O 10 O CO Cr) O CO O O CV (0 O (A Lo (0 CO LO r O (0 0) M O ti O CO (A CV LO CO O d' M a) () (0 1 0 N a) cc J O J 0 a) N (a m N (0 N to" O 0) .0 z N (0 'a a) a) M O O O (A L0 (0 CO CV O (0 (O CO CV O CO CO L0 CO O M (/) O O O LO E O O L O O O O (o (I) O N N 4) N cV CO O CV CO (V r O (V O O N STANDARD ANALYSIS O CO 0 4) N 5 0 Q m d N M a) a E O co O Y (p (0 N CU L1 u) 7) O O O E O O O O O O O O V' CO O CO O O 10 ULI Minimums (0 a) T.) O L restaurant (0 O (0 O ,410 • Apollo Landing — Lino Lakes, MN Site Design Standards Prepared by Equinox Development, LLP • Z-104 5- it'07,Z4,-. • • DRAFT April 8, 2005 Apollo Landing Site Design Standards CONTENTS I. Building Design Standards II. Landscaping and Aesthetics III. Sign Plan Data exhibits IV. Lighting Plan Data exhibits V. Site Maintenance q•ev"° / ,�mr &s4)'' i .110k ' 191 'ill • • DRAFT April 8, 2005 I. BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS The design features of the individual buildings will include a select variety of design materials which will feature a combination of natural earth tones with appropriate accent colors, together in a very distinct, handsome architectural style that is in scale with the site and the surrounding land uses. Equinox Development may, at its discretion, retain review authority through restrictive covenants on the individual properties to insure compliance with the proposed commercial neighborhood architectural design theme. This authority, however, is subordinate to the City of Lino Lakes review authority. All proposed buildings will be required to create a pedestrian friendly streetscape image. Limitations will be created for detached accessory structures. Building massing for all individual buildings and for the arrangement on the site will combine with landscape elements and lighting to highlight entry and sequence. Each building's exterior elevation will work within the time honored aesthetic vocabulary of three -part composition. A base, middle, and top will each be articulated to give clarity to the buildings as well as tie all elements of the site together in a simple cohesive composition. Color and texture will be used to denote these differences. Common materials will tie the complex together. Buildings shall generally relate in scale and design features to others on the site and to other developments in the area, showing respect for local context. Equinox' intent is to create a complex in tune with Lino Lakes Marketplace and Legacy at Lino Lakes thereby creating triangular anchors supportive of a common architectural design and color theme. Buildings shall avoid long, monotonous, uninterrupted wall or roof planes. A wall surface shall be no longer than 30 feet without a break. Building wall offsets, including both projections and recesses, fenestration, and changes in floor elevations, where possible, shall be used in order to add architectural interest and variety, and relieve the visual effect of a single, long wall. Similarly, roofline offsets shall be provided, in order to provide architectural interest and variety to the massing of a building and relieve the effect of a single, long roof. The front facade of a building shall be architecturally emphasized through fenestration, entrance treatments and details. The architectural treatment of the front facade shall be continued, in its major features, around all visibly exposed sides of a building. All sides of a building shall be architecturally designed to be consistent with regard to style, materials, colors, and details. All visibly exposed sides of a building shall have an articulated base course and cornice. The top of the base course shall align with at least the sill level of the first story. The cornice shall terminate or cap the top of a building wall, and must project out horizontally from the vertical building wall plane and may be ornamented with moldings, brackets and other details. The middle section of a building may be horizontally divided at floor, lintel or sill levels with belt or string courses. Gable roofs must be constructed with a minimum pitch of 9/12 to the greatest extent possible. Where hip roofs are used, the minimum pitch must be 6/12. Both gable and hip roofs should provide overhanging eaves on all sides that extend a minimum of one foot beyond the building wall. Flat roofs are required on buildings of a minimum two stories • DRAFT April 8, 2005 or more in height, provided all visibly exposed walls have an articulated cornice that projects out horizontally from the vertical building wall. Architectural embellishments that add visual interest to roofs, such as dormers, belvederes, cupolas, clock towers and other similar elements are encouraged. Fenestration shall be architecturally compatible with the style, materials, colors and details of a building. Windows shall be vertically proportioned wherever possible. Windows shall be recessed a minimum of two inches from walls or exterior trim to create shadow for visual interest. Clear or low -tint glass must be used for windows and doors; mirrored glass is prohibited. To the extent possible, the location of windows on the upper stories of a building shall be vertically aligned with the location of windows and doors on the ground level, including storefronts or display windows. Blank windowless walls are not permitted. All entrances to a building shall be defined and articulated by architectural elements such as lintels, pediment, pilasters, columns, porticos, overhangs, railing, balustrades, and others, where appropriate. Any such element utilized shall be architecturally compatible with the style, materials, colors and details of the building as a whole, as shall the doors. Storefronts that are an integral part of a building shall be designed with the upper floors of a building to be compatible with the overall character of the facade. Ground floor retail, service and restaurant uses may have large pane display windows on the ground level. Such windows shall be framed by the surrounding wall and shall not exceed seventy -five percent of the total ground level facade area. Glass curtain walls are discouraged. Buildings with multiple storefronts shall be unified through the use of architecturally compatible materials, colors, details, awnings, signage, and lighting fixtures. Fixed or retractable awnings are permitted at ground level, and on upper levels where appropriate, provided they complement a building's architectural style, are compatible with its materials, colors and details, do not conceal architectural features, such as cornices, columns, pilasters or decorative details, do not impair facade composition, and are designed as an integral part of the facade. Canvas is the preferred material, although other waterproofed fabric may be used: metal or aluminum are not permitted. In buildings with multiple storefronts, compatible awnings must be used as a means of unifying the structure. Light fixtures attached to the exterior of a building shall be architecturally compatible with the style, materials, colors, and details of the building and shall comply with local building codes. The type of light source used on the exterior of buildings, parking areas, pedestrian walkways and other areas of the site, and the quality of light produced, shall be the same or compatible. Facades shall be lit from the exterior and, as a general rule, lights should be concealed through shielding or recessed behind architectural features. Mounting brackets and associated hardware should be inconspicuous. DRAFT April 8, 2005 All air conditioning units, HVAC systems, exhaust pipes or stacks, elevator housing and satellite dishes and other telecommunications receiving devices shall be thoroughly screened from view from the public right -of -way and from adjacent properties, by using walls, louvers, fencing, roof elements, penthouse -type screening devices or landscaping. Fire escapes shall not be visible from any street right -of -way. In buildings requiring a second means of egress pursuant to local building codes, internal stairs or other routes of egress shall be used. Dumpster space, with the exception of food service refuse or other refuse not permitted indoors according to Building Code, shall be contained within a building. All outdoor trash areas, if necessary, shall be fully screened per the City of Lino Lakes Ordinances and shall be compatible with other structures on site in regards to architecture, building materials, coloration, etc. All materials, colors and architectural details used on the exterior of a building shall be compatible with the building's style, as well as with each other. A building designed of an architectural style that normally includes certain integral materials, colors and or details shall incorporate such into its design. Material changes must not occur at external corners (with the exception of quoins, which are encouraged), but may occur at reverse or interior corners or as a return — at least four feet from external corners. Equinox Development shall review all design, coloration, placement and construction on this property prior to submittal to the City of Lino Lakes. The use of common materials throughout the development will be required in order to provide visual continuity of the site, as well as with nearby developments. All buildings will use the following materials or other materials substantially similar in color and texture: Material Manufacturer Color Finish Brick field Belden Jewel Blend Velour Texture Brick Accent Belden Potomac Clear Dart-Tex CMU Base Anchor Mojave Rock Face CMU Accent Anchor Saddle Burnished EIFS Base Dryvit Patchwood Quartzputz EIFS Field Dryvit Manor White Quartzputz EIFS Cornice Dryvit Cotton Quartzputz Metal Roof UNACLAD Hartford Green smooth Metal Roof UNACLAD Brandywine smooth Metal Flashing to match or compliment Cornice Color Ledgestone O/C Caramel n/a Majestic Slate Ecostar Stone Red n/a Majestic Slate Ecostar Earth Green n/a Hardi -Board Hardie to match field colors n/a Slateline GAF Slate Red n/a Slateline GAF Slate Green n/a • Franchise images of tenants shall be coordinated with these materials when possible. DRAFT April 8, 2005 • The following exterior building materials are specifically prohibited: Plastic, except when used to replicate old styles (e.g. polyurethane moldings, columns, etc.) Metal or vinyl siding Plywood Corrugated metal or fiberglas Standard form concrete block- smooth faced Tilt -up concrete panels — smooth faced Smooth pre- fabricated steel panels • • • • DRAFT April 8, 2005 II. LANDSCAPING AND AESTHETICS Entry into the site will be facilitated by a large Pylon sign at the West side of the entrance and a ground lit masonry monument identifying the development, by name, on the East side of the entrance. Upon turning into the site, a user will be visually led down the tree -lined main drive to the four -story hotel at the terminus. General site landscaping is detailed on the landscaping plan including: 1. Treated wood privacy fence at the perimeter of the property 2. Ten foot wide sodded area between fence and curb for parking lot/driveways 3. Planter islands down the main drive including Green Ash or other shade trees 4. Parking lot planter islands in Lots 2 and 3 including Flowering Crab trees 5. Additional Flowering Crab trees shall be planted throughout the site In regard to the items listed above, Equinox Development will require the following shall applv: 1. The visual impact of the interior of the privacy fence will be mitigated by clusters of vegetation plantings and/or tree plantings at a maximum of forty feet on center 2. Per the request of the City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board, native plant communities may be installed in lieu of sod, at locations required by the Board 3. Planter islands shall also include ornamental vegetation 4. Additional trees shall be planted at the perimeter and on individual lots. All building plans shall include a landscaping plan to be reviewed by the City of Lino Lakes. All landscaping will conform to the City of Lino Lakes requirements under "General Provisions" Section 3, Subdivision 4 -Q. All areas with sod, and curb islands with vegetation, will be irrigated. It is Equinox' stated desire that we encourage input from the City in regard to all aspects of landscaping elements. Site features such as water, public art, flags and banners are strongly encouraged provided they contain no commercial message. Should building planters be desired, they must be integral to the design of the building It is required that all constructed buildings in this development have a landscaping element, at a minimum of sixty percent of the lineal front facade, and sixty percent of one other side, at a minimum width of three feet. It shall be encouraged that these beds be lighted. All areas of land other than that occupied by building or impervious surface shall be landscaped with sod and /or mulch and /or ornamental vegetation and /or river washed rock material in planting beds. Final slope grades steeper than the ratio of 3:1 will not be permitted without special landscaping treatments such as terracing, retaining walls, or ground cover. All trees used within this site development shall be indigenous to the appropriate hardiness zone and physical characteristics of this site. All deciduous trees proposed to satisfy the minimum requirements of this development shall be long -lived hardwood species. • DRAFT April 8, 2005 All landscaping incorporated in the plan shall conform to the following standards: 1) All plants must be at least equal to the following minimum size: Shade trees Half trees (Flowering C6rabtree) Evergreen trees Tall Shrubs & Hedge Material (Evergreen or Deciduous) Low Shrubs — Deciduous Low Shrubs — Evergreen Spreading Evergreen Potted/Bare Root Balled & Burlapped 2" 6' 2" 1 1/2" 3 -4' 3 -4' 3 -4' 18 -24" 24 -30" 18 -24" 24 -30" Potted 18 -24" 18 -24" Potted 2) New Plantings include but are not limited to: a) Deciduous Trees: Common Name: Oak Maple Hackberry (Thornless) Birch Honeylocust Linden/Basswood (American and Little Leaf) Ash (Green and White) Ginkgo (male tree only) Kentucky Coffee Tree Ohio Buckeye Amur Chokecherry Delaware American Elm Amur Cork Robusta Poplar Niobe Weeping Willow Crabapple Common Name: b) Evergreen Trees: DRAFT April 8, 2005 9 Fir Spruce Pine Canadian Hemlock European Larch Cedar c) Shrubs: Common Name: Dwarf - winged euonymus Winged euonymus Privet Mock Orange Sumac Common lilac Japanese yew American arborvitae d) Ground Covers: Common Name: Ground Juniper Periwinkle, myrtle e) Pond Plantings: All pond plantings shall require City review and approval 3) Prohibited Trees: a) Deciduous Trees: Amur Maple Norway Maple Silver Maple Siberian Elm Cottonwood b) Coniferous Trees: Colorado Spruce • DRAFT April 8, 2005 • I11. Sign Plan Data _ A. Description: 1. Apollo Landing 2. 540 Lilac St. - Lino Lakes 3. Graphic scale will be per exhibit B. Existing and Proposed Conditions: 1. At present, there are no existing freestanding or ground signs. 2. Proposed pylon sign, located to the West of main entrance, will total two hundred (200) square feet of signagc sign area and will not exceed forty (40) feet in height and will not be closer than five (5) feet to property line. The Pylon Sign will conform to building design standards relating to composition, color, building materials and overall continuity with the Planned Unit Development. See Exhibit 1 designed to identify the Planned Unit Development as "Apollo Landing" monument sign will conform to design standards relating to composition, Development. See Exhibit 2 Note: submitted monument sign is 9' x 12'. The pylon sifrn has adequate base provide indentification sijin for the development. 4:3.Proposed individual Business signs will be attached to the building (wall or parapet) wall up to one hundred (100) square feet or twenty percent (20 %) of the building face area, whichever is greater. Variations on face colors, size and font style of letters is allowed within the guidelines, color of all returns and Trim Caps to be Bronze. See Exhibit 3: Channel Letter on Race -Way. Signs will be substantially in line horizontally with roofline and /or parapet line to maintain aesthetic continuity. One additional Business sign will be allowed for buildings with a secondary exposure, on the back or side of building, up to fifty (50) square feet or ten percent (10 %) of the building face area, whichever is greater. The additional sign shall be for the tenant behind the wall giving the secondary exposure. For example, a sign on the end of a building shall be only for the business located on the end of the building. Specifications other than size are the same as Primary signage however, l- however. no signs shall be allowed on the northern walls of buildings 1, 2, 3, or 4 and no signs shall be allowed on the west side of building 1. 5. l.A11 building wall signage will use 3M Scotchcal Translucent Film Series 230 or similar for color. See Exhibit 4. C. General Regulations: 1. All signs shall be constructed in conformance with the provisions of the Uniform Sign Code published by the International Conference of Building Officials. • • DRAFT April 8, 2005 2. Signs shall not be painted directly to any exterior building surface, but shall be on a separate frame except for temporary display windows. 3. No sign shall be installed, which by reason of position, shape of color would conflict with proper function or interpretation of any traffic sign or signal. 4. There shall be no use of revolving beacons, flashing signs, zip flashers or similar lighted devices. 5. No sign shall be permitted to obstruct any window, door, fire escape, stairway or opening of any building or structure. 6. Signs which become unsafe or unkempt in appearance shall be repaired or removed by the Tenant / Owner upon notification by the Zoning Official. 7. The source of light for any sign must be indirect or diffused and shall not be directed into any adjoining residential district. 8. Roof signs are prohibited. 'ESC opt ter • • • IQ Pylon Sign Prototype Apollo Landing — Lino Lakes, MN • • Man represents 90ZLd-90-SVa • 9P91 V-90-1O0 - 909C0-80-dO1 aoroa -fo-aoa - dol + suuinloo Nfl l iPofl „on- x gp • • • n A V4 O46NVa1 roar autos 1313 —31ONV 'mug •wnlV .site X „3/1 -1 3113N313VV 3N3OMbO3-NON N _ > T m • T m A v P' 0 ▪ O m m Z O z Z Z o • o O r Z C N N M gz O z �, z G1 A m T m z 7C A O m to a c 3 o n z , A m j UUU • • = Z R. r D > j C 2 y O C O n c ro R C R 7 T r. 0 o G 0 r. = O N 3 y R R cr n rt rt n .+ Effective Performance Life NTDNE' Colors. The appropriate I'ANIONE Color the GERBER EDGE digital printing system. co Z '±- .7....,.., n e ' T. u X C C -r y /D O 3 -y n. - r 15 O n j a _ o 3 n _ < n ^ ft s x n T n- - $ n Do W = = y C a 3 ,; o' o c G O = = C T y ry R Y C f D. j n x = 1 _ p 3 a,.. .O R N F 7 D. R a 54.-- C 6+ . - -77 p. O J • R C 0 = C - = 2 C X y t . = _ 0 r r K D 2 rD ti J = : r L C. G • G = 0 - - - 7 = - N 0 _ G R O La 2 _. S O i - _ S g DRAFT April 8, 2005 I IV. Lighting Plan Data A. Description: Apollo Landing 540 Lilac St. — Lino Lakes Graphic scale will be per exhibit C. Types of Lighting Applications: 1. Architectural: Accent lighting of architectural features is encouraged to highlight building massing and rhythm and enhance the pedestrian environment. Accent lighting shall not be a source of glare, reflected glare, or excessive light, especially when viewed from residences and streets, walkways or open spaces. 2. Building Entries: Building entries with high activity levels shall be illuminated. Appropriate treatments include: bathing entry surfaces and doorways with light, allowing the buildings interior light to glow through glazing, or using decorative lighting fixtures to announce entries. 3. Service Areas: Building mounted down light fixtures, in combination with pole fixtures, are preferred for the illumination of building service areas. Such fixtures do not cause glare of light leakage beyond the service areas. 4. Landscaped Frontages: Regular up lighting of walls or other structures in Landscaped Frontages may occur throughout Apollo Landing and must be coordinated to create a consistent and dramatic effect. 5. Landscaped Walkways: Landscaped Walkways and other pedestrian paths — unless adjacent to a building that provides adequate lighting — shall be lit by pole or bollard type fixtures that must be at least three (3) feet in height, to facilitate visibility in snow banks / drifts, but not to exceed four (4) feet in height. 6. Seating Areas: Where a more intimate environment is desired, light bollards and other forms of indirect illumination are appropriate. C. Existing and Proposed Conditions: This lighting plan is designed to use lighting systems that will reduce light pollution and to promote nighttime safety, utility, security and productivity. 1. Location and dimensions of all proposed structures and parking areas can be identified on the proposed Site Plan. See Exhibit 1 2. All lighting will be designed to conform with the following: a. Intensity — No light source or combinations thereof which cast light on a public street shall exceed one (1) foot candle (meter reading) as measured from the right -of -way line of said street. Any light source of combination thereof which cast light on adjacent residential property shall not exceed • • DRAFT April 8, 2005 four- tenths (0.4) foot candles (meter reading) as measured at the property line per the method outlined in Section 3, Subd. 4.F.5 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. b. Cutoff — The luminaire shall contain a cutoff, which directs and cuts off the light at an angle of ninety (90) degrees or less, except lights highlighting architectural features or landscaping. c. Height — Parking and Roadway fixtures and poles will not exceed twenty five (25) feet above the ground grade, with all pole heights to be uniform. No fixture mounted on a building will exceed the height of the building. d. Location — All outdoor light fixtures shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from a street right -of -way and five (5) feet from an interior side or rear lot line. No light source shall be located on the roof unless said light enhances the architectural features of the building. e. Hours of Operation — The use of outdoor lighting for parking lots serving commercial and industrial businesses shall be turned off one (1) hour after closing, except for approved security lighting. ] f. All illuminated on- premise signs for advertising purposes shall be turned off between 12:00 AM and sunrise except that said signs may be illuminated while the business facility on the premise is open for service. 3. Exemptions: a. This Lighting Plan does not prohibit the use of temporary outdoor lighting used during customary holiday seasons. b. This Lighting Plan does not prohibit the use of temporary outdoor lighting used for civic celebrations and promotions. 2. Fixture Specifications: 1. Parking and Roadway lighting: a. Fixture — Ruud Lighting "Square Dome" with 6" extended pole mount; or approved equal. Color of all to be Bronze. See Exhibit 2 b. Pole Mount — Ruud lighting PS Series Crown -Weld poles; or approved equal. Color of all to be Bronze. See Exhibit 3 2. Wall and Accent Lighting: a. Fixture — Ruud Lighting 8" Series SE5 "Up /Down Cutoff'; or approved equal. Color to be bronze. See Exhibit 4 b. Fixture — Ruud Lighting, Medium Parabolic Floodlight LPM Series; or approved equal. Color to be bronze. Note: DRAFT April 8, 2005 this fixture to be used only to accent landscaping features, not to be used for buildings. See Exhibit 5 i. Ground Mount Post PFM -1; or approved equal. Color to be bronze. ii. Wall Mount Bracket WM -4; or approved equal. Color to be bronze. c. Fixture — Ruud Lighting "Recessed Canopy Light ", RC Series 12" MRC0410 -1; or approved equal. Color to be Bronze. See Exhibit 6 3. Landscape / After - Sunset Directional Lighting: a. Fixture — Ruud Lighting "Luma Directional Well Light" Series GL23S; or approved equal. Color to be Bronze. See Exhibit 7 4. Bollards: a. Bollard Panel — Ruud Lighting PACE Series; or approved equal. Color to be bronze. See Exhibit 8 b. Fixture — Perimeter Cutoff CE3 Series; or approved equal. Color to be bronze. See Exhibit 9 • •Xlitlism Treated Wood Privacy Fence u >cc LI Jumos o s t • Treated Wood Privacy Fence 4 u c 0 0 0 5 4.re7 \ \ r ‘‘. Pon Sign Lilac Drive NOTE: ANY UTIUTIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED 8Y THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTIUTIES hereoy certly :hot this survey was preparee 1 AO:1.'10 Oy rhe .ice' rhy direct SuDervisiOn. one or..7 pPWN CHKO AC that ' c Cy 00005,0 4000 Suf v0yOr I the lows of the Stele of Minnesota 1 1 1 • • • =ICH-It) RUUD LIGHTING 5.3 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.1 5.1 5 5.3 '3.1 '3.6 5.3 5.1 5.1 53.3 5.1 '1.1 • •.3 5.2 5.5 • 5.2 5.2 •.3 '3.2 5.5 5.3 5.7 5.1 .1 '1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 3.2 .3.3 3.3 3.3 1.3 1.1 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 1.3 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.3 3.1 1.1 3.1 1.3 5.3 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.7 5.3 '3.a '3.3 .3.7 19.2 .1.3 "5.3 '5.5 2.9 't.1 "3.5 5.0 5 '1.1 '3.1 5.3 '1.3 '3.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 '2.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5. '3.3 19.1 5 . 5 .1 5 .1 5.2 19.5 19.3 ' 3 . 3 5.3 *3.3 5 .3 5.1 ' 3 . 3 ' 3 . 3 . 3 5 .3 '3.3 '3.1 "3.3 5.3 5.1 •. . . '2.3 . 5.5 5.1 5. 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.3 'a.3 '3.3 '3.1 5.1 '3.3 5.3 5.3-5.3 5.3 5.1 5.3 1.3 5.3 5. 3 550 5.4 5.5 5.2 5.3 '3.1 5.3 '3.3 •.3 5.0 5.3 '3.3 5.3 5.3 •.1 '3.1 '3.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.5 5. a.7 5.3 5.7 5.5 3 *3.5 5.5 '1.0 *1.1 5.1 •.2 '3.3 '3.3 '3.3 '1.3 •.7 '1.3 5.3 '3.3 '3.1 5.3 '3.3 '3.3 '1.3 19.3 '3.3 5.3 5. 5.5 'a., 5.2 '3.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 '3.3 "3.3 5.7 '3.3 5.1 •3.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.7 5.3 "3. 5.3 5.3 5.0 '3.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 '3.3 5.3 'a. 5.3 7111 5.2 5.1 5.3 5.7 5.7 3.3 .3.3 5.2 5.7 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.3 5.0 5.7 5.• 5.1 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.a 1.3 "1.1 5.2 5.3 '3.2 5.3 5.1 •.3 '3.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5. .3.1 .1.3 '3 . 3 '3.1 '3.1 '5. '3. '_.1 '1.1 '5.1 5.3 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 '1.1 5.1 5.3 5.3 .5.4 3.1 1.3 5.3 '1.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 '3.3 '3.3 '3.1 19.3 '3. .".3 3.3 3.1 3.3 .5.5 '1.2 3.5 1.3 5.3 2.3 5.5 '3.3 3. 3 "3.3 5.5 '3.3 '3.3 . •. '2.3 •.3 '1.1 5.3 5.3 •. 5.6 '3.119,4 5.? •.5 5.1 5.3 5 7 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.3 5.3 5. L•4--1.7 5.3 •.3 5.3 5. 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.5 5 \ 5.7 5!...7.• 5.7 5.5 •3.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 '7.3 5. 19.3 5.3 5.7 5.3 5.1 5.3 5.1 5.4 K.. 71 5.2, '3.1 '3.1 "3.3 '3. ',a 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.1 '3.0 5. 2.3 :.3 5.1 '1 ..3'.',....,:t,.: .1 '1.1 '3.5 .\1 '3. ' 5.3 19.3 '3.3 5.3 •.3 5.3 '5.3 '3.1 ( ). a 5.1 5 . 3 5 . 3 19.3 '3.3 . 3 . 1 a . 2 3.3 a . I 3 . 3 . 3 '5 . 5 '2 • ' _ 5.5‘,...5'.1 5. 5.) 5.7 5.1 5.3 5.6 5.5...:41,,,,:1,.5 5.7‘.1.3 5. 5 3 5.3 5.3 5.3 '3.3 '3.3 5.3 5.3 '1.3 5.1 5.1 5.1I 5.1 19\ 5.5 5. 3 5.3 5 .5.3 "1.3 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.1 5.3 5.1 5. 3. 3 5.3 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.3 19.3 5.3 5.7 5.3 •3.3 5.1 5.1 54/ 5.7 5.3 5.3 5.3 '3.3 5.3 5.3 5.7 5.3 5.3 5.1 '3.3 '5.3 5.7 5.3 5.s 5.3 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.1 '5.3 5.3 '3.3 5.1 5 7 5.3 5.7 5.3 5.7 5.3 5.3 '5.3 5.3 3.3 '3.3 5.1 5 PR2640-M 4333 25' 174T3v :5■555. `• 5.3 5.3 5.7 5.3 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 '3.3 5. 5.3 5.1 •.3 5.3 5.3 '3.3 5.3 5.7 5,1 5.3 5.3 '3.1 5.3 '3.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 '3.3 '3.7 •.3 53.3 5.3 '3.1 5.3 53.3 •.1 5.3 *7 7 5.1 5.3 5.2 •.3 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 '3.3 5.3 '3.1 5.7 :3.3 5.3 '3.1 *3.3 5.3 5.7 5.3 •.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.7 5.7 5.3 1.1 5.1 "1.3 '3 SE4410-D 100 W MH "FRONT" "STDE" 1.41.•W • 57,5. =". P lar. 333r-tarrst...rn3.43333a7- RUUD LIGHTING ...."'"=.31=""".1'.,`•""""" j.1E3EmEilt-3E RUUD' LIGHTING 6" EXTENDED MOUNT Mil- SQUARE DOME'® PARKING /ROADWAY (TYPE III) • I 1 • 6' (152 mm) Ballast S? s:3C: SPr c x= SPIT SPEC SPEC SPEC Housing Seamless, die -cast aluminum Finish color: bronze 19.0 '..J (482 mm) Cord 24' (610 mm) long Extended Pole Mount Finish color: bronze PULSE START METAL HALIDE 200W PSMH 250W PSMH 300W PSMH _ 320W PSMH t 350W PSMH t 400W PSMH 450W PSMH 450W PSMH 750W PSMH S3V2620- ia)(b) S3V2625 -i a) (b ) S3V2630-(a)(b) S3V2632 -(a) (b ) S3V2635 -i a 1(b 1 S3V2640- a 1(h ) S3V2645- (a)(b) S3V2645-(a )(b) S3V2675-(a)(b) METAL HALIDE ❑ 5'rr: , 250W MH S3V2425-0)(b) ❑ Spec 400W MH S3V2440- (a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM ❑ SPEC - 250W HPS S3V2525- (a)(b1 U ,P (= 400W HPS S3V2540- (a1(.bl Speedy (al Voltage and (h1 Options. 2 -Level avarladle - consult factory . 4 Reduced envelope ED28 lamp. - Patented Hinge Assembly :iammunanirms.- la! Parking lot and roadway luminaire for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Supplied with IES Type III optical system. Housing is seamless, die -cast aluminum. Mounting consists of a 1.75' (44 mm) wide by 4.5' (114 mm) high by 6' (152 mm) long extruded aluminum arm. The arm is held in place with two 3/8' (9 mm) mounting rods fastened to a steel backing plate inside the pole, and by two nuts inside the fixture housing. Mounting rods are provided with sealing washers to prevent water leakage. Lens assembly consists of rigid aluminum frame and high - impact, clear- tempered glass (sag lens for 450 & 750W PSMH and 250 & 400W HPS). — Capacitor 13.7' (349 mm) -- Ignitor — — Lampholder Lamp (Included) Reflector Hydroformed aluminum with brightened and anodized finish Lens Frame Die -cast atuminum door frame secures lens; sealed with silicone gasket Finish color. black VIEW Ni 120/208/2401277V (Standard) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) 1 120V 2 277V 27 277V Reactor (200 -450W PSMH Croy) 3 208V 4 240V 5 480V 6 347V (Canada Only) For wtbpe wall: Orley outside the US and Canada. we 1ueem TD-9 or contra your Ruud Writing authorized Intemabonal Oxstnhutor. 1ELECIECAC Fixture includes clear, mogul -base lamps. 320 – 400W PSMH and 400W MH utilize the ED28 reduced envelope lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kV rated screw- shell -type lampholder with spring - loaded center contact. Lamp ignitor included where required. Ballast assemblies are high -power factor and consist of the following circuit types: Reactor (277V PSMH) 200 – 450W PSMH CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 200 – 750W PSMH; 250 – 400W MH; 250 – 400W HPS 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA ® Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed In USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 www.ruudligntmg.com Notes 1 -1a)F Fusing -(a )P Button Photocell (N/A on 480V) -SP External Photocell (to( 480V) Speedy (a 1 Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key SBL -19 SBL -19S Backlight Shield (flat lens) Backlight Shield (sag lens) Exclusive DettaGuard° finish features an E-coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat. providing excellent resistance to corrosion. ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven - year limited warranty. ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL and CUL Listed for wet locations, and enclosure classified IP54 per IEC 529 and IEC 598. Patent Pending US 4,689,729 FAX (262) 884 -3309 01/1444 • 6" EXTENDED MOUNT SQUARE DOME' PARKING /ROADWAY (TYPE III) 180° 150 120° ``„'1 ,* •0,.1 Y414.011.01 PirekTil e* 'maw& Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 15891 Candlepower distribution curve at 400W HPS Square Dome Light Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 15868 Candlepower distribution curve at 400W PSMH Square Dome Light Pole- spacing Example Data Lamp Type 250W PSMH Lamp Lumens 23,750 320W PSMH 31,350 41,800 250W HPS 28,000 51,000 400W PSMH 400W HPS UUD LIGHTING 120 100 80 60 40 140 120 100' B0 60' 40' 20' a 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 386 335 244 183 122 81 27 0' 37 40 2 80 tar 120 42.7 36.6 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 Om 6.1 122 183 24.4 30.5 0 m 61 122 183 244 305 366 Isolootcandle plot of 400W HPS Cutoff Square Dome Light at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height and 0° tilt above horizontal (Plan view) 12J 10.1 6U W 40 2J V 20 4U lL lL 1W 121 140' 120' 100' 80 60 40 20' a 20' 40' 60 80 100' 366 305 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 Om 6.1 42.7 36.6 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 183 24.4 335 122 183 24.4 315 388 Isolootcandle plot of 400W PSMH Square Dome Light at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height, 0° tilt above horizontal (Plan view) Mounting Height 25' (7.6 m) 30' (9.1 m) 30' (9.1 m) 35' (10.7 m) 30' (9.1 m) 35' (10.7 m) 25' (7.6 m) 30' (9.1 m) 30' (9.1 m) 35' (10.7 m) /AREA 7 Test area is centered within a (16) pole tryout. Max. Recommended Pole- spacing X x Y Footcandles 125' (38.1 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 2.43 150' (45.8 m) x 120' (36.6 m) 1.68 150' (45.8 m) x 120' (36.6 m) 2.22 175' (53.4 m) x 175' (53.4 m) 1.77 150' (45.8 m) x 150' (45.8 m) 2.47 175' (53.4 m) x 175' (53.4 m) 1.89 150' (45.8 m) x 125' (38.1 m) 2.09 180' (54.9 m) x 150' (45.8 m) 1.43 180' (54.9 m) x 150' (45.8 m) 2.59 210' (64.0 m) x 175' (53.4 m) 1.96 120 100 140 120 100 80 60 40' 20' tr 20 40' 60' 80' 100 20 W 40 27 0'27 40 60' 80 100120 42.7 38.6 30.5 24.4 182 122 6.1 om 6.1 122 18.3 24.4 30.5 356 335 24.4 183 122 81 0 m 61 122 183 244 30.5 386 Isolootcandle plot of 250W HPS Square Dome Light at 25' (7.5 m) mounting height, 0° tilt above horizontal (Plan view) 120 100 80 e0 40 27 0' 37 40 60 80 100 120 140 42.7 120' _.... _. __ .. - 36.6 100 - .._.._._ _.. 305 80' 24.4 .. 3 ''' 60 .. '` -` .. 18.3 122 6.1 0 Om 20 ! 6.1 Acr 122 BO' ._ _. .. 18.3 80 .. 24.4 100' 30.5 368 305 244 183 122 61 0 m 6,1 122 163 244 305 358 Isolootcandle plat at 250W PSMH Square Dome Light at 25' (7.6 m) mounting height, 0° tilt above horizontal (Plan view) Average Initial Light Levels at Grade (Footcandles - 0.0929 = Lux) 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 U.S.A. Lux 26 18 24 19 27 20 22 15 28 21 PHONE (262) 886 -1900 FAX (262) 88.4 -3309 © Ruud Lighting, Inc. Pnrrt d in USA www.ruudfig Ming. corn 01/14/04 STEEL CROWN- WELDTM POLES fr • • Polo cap (Suppled it tenon is not used) Square Steel Poles H(R)xW(in)x Wall (In) H(m) x imm)x Weil (mm) 1 Srr C: PS3S10Cfa)BZ Li srEC _ PS3S15C(a)BZ r i SPEC PS3S19C(a)BZ SPtC PS4S10C(a)BZ U --- Sr[c PS4S15C(a)BZ SPFC PS4S19Cia)BZ (i ;TT,- :: PS4S22C(a)BZ > / , PS4S25C(aIBZ Sr•c : PS4S25S(a1BZ • PS4S27C(a)BZ ( j SPFC PS4S30S {a)BZ C1 >arc " PS5S25S(a)BZ SPEC PS5S30S(a)BZ Q SPIT = PS6S30S(aIBZ SPEC ;: t confburation SPEC: ,, 10x3x0.125 3.0x76x3 15x3x0.125 4.6x76x3 _19x3x0.125 5.8x76x3 10x4x0.125 3.0x102x3 15x4x0.125 4.6x102x3 19x4x0.125 5.8x102x3 22x4x0.125 6.7x102x3 25x4x0.125 7.6x102x3 25x4x0.188 7.6x102x5 27x4x0.125 8.2x102x3 30x4x0.188 9.1x102x5 25x5x0.188 7.6x127x5 30x5x0.188 9.1x127x5 30x6x0.188 9.1x152x5 iffsz Non - tapered steel poles are supplied with welded base with cover, four galvanized anchor bolts, masonite mounting template and a pole cap (except tenon mount). Each bolt is provided • with two washers and two nuts. Steel pole base has slotted holes. Per National Electrical Code requirements, pole is standard with a 2' x 6' (51 x 152 mm) hand hole, located 12' (305 mm) above bottom of pole base. A 110-32 stainless - steel weld stud with grounding lug is located inside pole, opposite hand hole; a hand hole cover is supplied but shipped separately. For EPA ratings, see'Windloading" sheet. 61 US 5,820,255, 6,640,517 Notes 1 -• Single (direct mount) 2 •--• Twin 0180° (direct mount) 3 1 ▪ Twin 0 90° (direct mount) T Tenon (order tenon separately) For fixtures with tired 20' mount, add brats( 2 to configuration numbers: i.e- 21.22. 23. 25 and 26. 5 M 6 f1a Triple (direct mount) Quad (direct mount) 66 Square, non - tapered pole of structural steel tubing (ASTM A 500); with a minimum yield strength of 46,000 p.s.i. Welded to a formed carbon steel base plate with a minimum yield strength of 36,000 p.s.i. Exclusive DettaGuard° finish features an E-coat epoxy primer with medium bronze uttra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, uttraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven -year limited warranty. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 Ruud Lighting square poles meet or exceed National Electrical Code Requirements. In the 118, Ruud square poles are classified by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. for electrical ground bonding; in Canada, they are CSA certified for electrical ground bonding and structural strength. Catalog # REC -GFIBZ (120V) Wet Listed In -use cover FAX (262) 884 -3309 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Pnnted in USA www.ruudlighong.com 9/1,04 GFI Outlet Accessory RUUD LIGHTING STEEL CROWN- WELD" POLES •1OC(a)BZ 10'(3.0m)x3'(76mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.50' (13 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4' -10 x 18' (457 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 200 lbs. (91 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -58 lbs. (26 Kg) PS3S15Cta)BZ 15' (4.6 m) x 3' (76 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4'-10 x 18' (457 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' -11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight -175 lbs. (79 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -82 lbs. (37 Kg) PS3319Cla)BZ 19' (5.8 m) x 3' (76 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4'-10 x 18' (457 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3 - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight -150 lbs. (68 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 92 lbs. (42 Kg) PS481QC1 a )BZ 10' (3.0 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate -10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4' -10 x 18' (457 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' -11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight -300 Ibs. (136 Kg) roximata shipping weight - 78 Ibs. (35 Kg) S15C(a}BZ ro'(4.6m)x4'(102mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor torts -3/4"-10 x30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bait circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' -11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 300113s. (136 Kg) Apprmdmate shipping weight -119 Ibs. (54 Kg) PS4S19ClalBZ 19'(5.8m)x4'(102mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4' -10 x 30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt drde diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 280 lbs. (127 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -144 lbs. (65 Kg) PS4S22CtaiBZ 22' (6.7 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4' -10 x 30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 240 Ibs. (109 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -163 Ibs. (74 Kg) PS4S25C(a}BZ 25 (7.6 m) x 4' (102 mm) ' Wall thickness - 0.125' (5 mm) Base date - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bats - 3/4' -10 x30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 210 Ibs. (95 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 182 lbs. (83 Kg) ¶UUD LIGHTING PS4S25s(a)BZ 25' (7.6 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4'10 x30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter -10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 325 Ibs. (148 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 252 lbs. (114 Kg) PS4S27C(a)6Z 27' (8.2 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bobs -3/4'10 x 30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' -11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 200 lbs. (91 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -195 lbs. (89 Kg) PS4S30SIa)BZ 30' (9.1 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4'10 x 30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt drde diameter - 10' (254 mm) 92' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 250 Ibs. (113 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -301 lbs. (137 Kg) PS5S253(alBZ 25' (7.6 m) x 5' (127 mm) Watt thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -1'-8 x 36' (914 mm) + 4' (102 mm) Bolt circle diameter -10' (254 mm) 9.7' - 11.3' (248 mm - 287 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 450 lbs. (204 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 320 Ibs.(145 Kg) PS5S30S(aIBZ 30' (9.1 m) x 5" (127 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Archon bob -1'-8 x36' (914 mm) + 4' m (102 rim) Bolt circle diameter -10' (254 mm) 9.T - 11.3' (248 mm - 287 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 375 Ibs. (170 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 379 lbs. (172 Kg) PS6S3OS(aIBZ 30' (9.1 m) x 6' (152 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate - 12' (305 mm) square x 1' (25 mm) thick Anchor bolts -1'-8 x 36 (914 mm) + 4' (102 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 11.5' (292 mm) 11.3' - 12.8' (286 mm - 324 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 525 Ibs. (238 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 457 bs. (207 Kg) 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 FAX (262) 884 -3309 Ruud Lighting Inc. Pnnted in USA www.ruudlighting.com 9/1/04 SQUARE WALL MOUNT . x of fr 8" (203 mm) UP /DOWN CUTOFF • • Ballast Sealing Gasket -- Housing Finish color. bronze Lens Spring-Clip Assembly Hidden from view Diffuse Aluminum Reflector and Ballast Cover Lamp -- (Included) Lampholder -- Ignitor 8' (203 mm) BOTTOM VIEW W METAL HALIDE SPEC Any 50W MH SE5405- ha)(b) SPEC ; Any 70W MH SE5407- ia)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM Any 35W HPS SE5503- (a)(b) Any 50W HPS SE5505- (a)(b) Any 70W HPS SE5507- (a)(b) Specdy (a) Vohage & Iu) Options SPEC a SPEC SPEC x GBIGlAAL DESIWUPf10111s Aluminum die-cast housing supplied. Knockouts are provided on the back of the housing for 1/2' conduit entry or for mounting over a single gang box, 4' square or 4' octagon boxes. NOTE: Knockouts are centered 1.6' above centerline of fixture. Two #8 x 1' threaded studs and nuts are provided for mounting over a junction box. Housing also includes 1/2' -14 NPT threaded hubs on three sides for conduit entry. Closed cell neoprene sponge gasketing on the back of the housing provides a watertight mounting seal. Silicone sponge cord gasket between housing and lens ensures a water- and insect - tight seal. Injection molded clear polycarbonate lens and shroud assembly is held in place using a hidden spring clip assembly. Combination of internal painted shroud and diffuse reflector provides controlled uplight and downlight with side cutoff. -- -- 0.25' (6 mm) 3.1' (79 mm) Silicone Gasket 4.1' (104 mm) Polycartonate Lens Aluminum Shroud Finish color bronze 112-14 NPT Threaded Hub UP UP 1/2' -14 NPT Threaded Hub Val:11E1E2M SET (r D 120/277V (Standard: 50 - 70W MH) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (70W MH) 1 120V (Standard: 35 - 70W H PS) 2 277V (35 - 70W HPS) 3 208V (35 - 70W HPS) 4 240V (35 - 70W HPS) 6 347V (Canada Only) (50 - 70W MH: 70W HPS) For weage avatabdrty outside the US and Canada. see Bulletin TD-9 or contact vow Ruud Ltgtavq aut onzed Intemabonal Disrnbutor. Fixtures include a clear, medium -base Tamp and porcelain enclosed, 4kv -rated screw -shell -type lampholder with spring - loaded center contact. Lamp ignitor included where required. All ballast assemblies are normal power factor and use the following circuit types: Reactor (120V only) 35 - 70W HPS Reactor/Transformer (208, 240, 277V) 35 - 70W HPS HX — High Reactance 50 - 70W MH ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in the US and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP54 per IEC 529 and IEC 598. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 1.6' (41 mm) 1 (- Notes (10 MPIONS (factory-installed) -- -(a)F Fusing' H High Power Factor Ballast (N /A tor 50W MH or 50 70W HPS with 347V) J Tamperproof Lens Fasteners -(a)P Photocell D Quartz Standby' (includes 100W quartz lamp) Soecdy (a) Single Voltage — See Voeage Sufta Key 'Quartz & fuse options are not available together. Housing is standard with our exclusive DeltaGuard° finish, featuring an E-coat epoxy primer with bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven -year limited warranty. ACCESS(MIEs. TPS -1 Tamperproof Screwdriver FAX (262) 884 -3309 C Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www. nl ud l ig hti n g. co rr 12/11/03 RUUD LIGHTING Front View SQUARE WALL MOUNT 8" (203 mm) UP /DOWN CUTOFF Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 11603 Candlepower distribution curve of 50W HPS Square Up/Down Cutoff Fixture. EFFICIENCY = 59.3% • Distance In Units of Mounting Height 1 2 3 4 1 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Distance In Units of Mounting Height Isofootcandle plot of 50W HPS Square Perimeter Cutoff fixture at 10' (3 m) mounting height. (Plan view) 'RUUD LIGHTING Isofootcandle plots show initial footcandles at grade. (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) ANGLE MEAN CP ANGLE MEAN CP 0.0 371 72.5 106 5.0 381 75.0 106 10.0 410 77.5 92 15.0 415 80.0 69 20.0 410 82.5 46 25.0 405 85.0 32 30.0 404 87.5 24 35.0 412 90.0 22 40.0 557 95.0 36 45.0 218 105.0 92 50.0 502 115.0 148 52.5 617 125.0 619 55.0 552 135.0 425 57.5 504 145.0 432 60.0 454 155.0 432 62.5 157 165.0 427 65.0 127 175.0 439 67.5 126 180.0 387 70.0 122 Maximum Candlepower: 619 Plane of Maximum CP: 67.5° Vertical Angle of Maximum Candlepower. 125.0° Lumen Rating: 4000 MOUNTING HEIGHT CONVERSION TABLE Footcandle readings for mounting heights other than 10' (3 m) may be obtained by multiplying fc values by the following: HEIGHT 7.0' (2.1 m) 8.0' (2.4 m) 9.0' (2.7 m) 12.0' (3.7 m) 15.0' (4.6 m) 20.0' (6.1 m) FACTOR 2.04 1.56 1.23 0.69 0.44 0.25 LAMP WATTAGE CONVERSION TABLE Footcandle readings for wattages and lamp types other than 50W HPS may be obtained by multiptying fc values by the following: LAMP/WATTAGE MULTIPLIER 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA 50W MH 70W MH 35W HPS 70W HPS 0.77 1.26 0.56 1.60 PHONE (262) 886 -1900 FAX (262) 884 -3309 CI Ruud Lighting Inc. Pnnted in USA www.ruudughnng.com 12111/03 *PA 4t1 - r ADJUSTABLE FITTER RECTANGULAR MEDIUM PARABOLIC FLOOD • • Dle -Cast Aluminum Housing - Finish color. bronze Dimensions (lens frame closed): 9.3' (235 mm)W x 16" (406 mm)L x 5.1' (130 mm)D Ignitor - (Where required) Capacitor -- — Pulse -Rated Porcelain Lampholder HID Lamp (Included) —Reflector Hydroformed aluminum with etched and anodized finish Adjustable Fitter Side View 5.5' (140 mm) Set Screws - - -_1 Black stemless steel - -Wiring Chamber 3.5' 89 mm) Tempered Glass Lens with silicone seal High Power Factor Ballast Patented Internal Hinge Assembly Lens Frame Die -cast aluminum door frame. sealed with silicone gasket Finish color. black — Captive Lens Screw Black stainless steel Adjustable Fitter Me-cast aluminum knuckle is sczed for 2' pipe (2 -318' [60 mm) O.D.) Finish Color bronze (See side view) (al IIIMGE SUFFIX SET- Notes (h).OPTI (Iractnry installed) .f.. PULSE START METAL HALIDE D 120/277V (Standard: 125W PSMH; -(a)F Fusing SPEC ( 125W PSMH LPM3612- (a)(b) ❑ SPEC 4 150W PSMH LPM3615- (a)(b) METAL HALIDE ❑ SPEC:1 50W MH LPM3405- ia)(h) rj SPEC a 70W MH LPM3407- (a)(b) ❑ SPEC 100W MH LPM3410- (a)(b) Q SPEC= 175W MH LPM3417- (a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SPECS 35WHPS LPM3503- (a)(b) sPECa 50W HPS LPM3505- (a )(b) SPEC4 70W HPS LPM3507- (a)(b) SPEC 100W HPS LPM3510- (a)(h) SPEC t-t 150W HPS LPM3515- (a)(b) Speedy (a) Voltage 8 (b) 0pnons. GEBENALDESIRUPTWL Medium -beam parabolic floodlight luminaire for HID tamp, totally enclosed. Hydroformed aluminum reflector is etched and anodized. Housing is seamless, die -cast aluminum. Aluminum die -cast adjustable fitter mounting is sized for 2' pipe (2-3/8" [60 mm] 0.D.). Allows for directional aiming as well as 2 -1/2° incremental vertical adjustment. Contains integral wiring compartment. Two stainless -steel set screws provide clamping to vertical tenons. Lens assembly consists of rigid aluminum frame and high - impact, clear- tempered glass. FHIISH Exclusive DeltaGuard® finish features an E -coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra- durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven - year limited warranty. 50 -1 (10W MH; 50W HPS) J Tamperproof Lens Fasteners M 120/208/240277V (Standard: 150W PSMH: 175W MH: 70 -150W HPS) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (Standard: 150W PSMH; 70 -175W MH: 70 -150W HPS) 1 120V (Standard: 35W HPS) 2 277V 27 277V Reactor (150W PSMH Only) 3 208V 4 240V 5 480V (175W MH; 70 - 100W HPS) 6 347V (Canada Only) For voltage avadaM4ly outsde the US and Canada. see Bulletin TD-9 or contact your Ruud LigMVq authorized Intemational Distnlxne- ELECTRICAL, Endure includes clear, medium -base lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv -rated screw - shell -type lampholder. Lamp ignitor included where required. All ballast assemblies are high - power factor and use the following circuit types: Reactor (277V PSMH) 150W PSMH Reactor 120V: 35 – 150W HPS HX — High Reactance 50 –100W MH; 50 –150W HPS CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 125 & 150W PSMH; 175W MH LABELS ANSI Tamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in US and Canada for wet locations. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA (0 Ruud Lighting Inc. Pnnted in USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 www.ruudlightng.com -5P External Photocell (for 480V) X Linear Spread Lens - Horizontal Y Linear Spread Lens Vertical Specity (a) Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key PATENT US 4,689,729 ACCESSINIIES; DB -12 Deep Baffle DL-L Internal Louver GS -12 Glare Shield LS-L Potycarbonate Vandal Shield (not for use with fortures in uplight position) PC -1 Button Photocell (tor fixtures set to 120V) PC *6 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 347V) PC-2 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 208. 240.277V) PGM -1 Ground Mount Post TPS -1 Tamperproof Screwdriver WG-L Wire Guard FAX (262) 884 -3309 12/11/03 RUUD LIGHTING _1a — Pulse -Rated Porcelain Lampholder HID Lamp (Included) —Reflector Hydroformed aluminum with etched and anodized finish Adjustable Fitter Side View 5.5' (140 mm) Set Screws - - -_1 Black stemless steel - -Wiring Chamber 3.5' 89 mm) Tempered Glass Lens with silicone seal High Power Factor Ballast Patented Internal Hinge Assembly Lens Frame Die -cast aluminum door frame. sealed with silicone gasket Finish color. black — Captive Lens Screw Black stainless steel Adjustable Fitter Me-cast aluminum knuckle is sczed for 2' pipe (2 -318' [60 mm) O.D.) Finish Color bronze (See side view) (al IIIMGE SUFFIX SET- Notes (h).OPTI (Iractnry installed) .f.. PULSE START METAL HALIDE D 120/277V (Standard: 125W PSMH; -(a)F Fusing SPEC ( 125W PSMH LPM3612- (a)(b) ❑ SPEC 4 150W PSMH LPM3615- (a)(b) METAL HALIDE ❑ SPEC:1 50W MH LPM3405- ia)(h) rj SPEC a 70W MH LPM3407- (a)(b) ❑ SPEC 100W MH LPM3410- (a)(b) Q SPEC= 175W MH LPM3417- (a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SPECS 35WHPS LPM3503- (a)(b) sPECa 50W HPS LPM3505- (a )(b) SPEC4 70W HPS LPM3507- (a)(b) SPEC 100W HPS LPM3510- (a)(h) SPEC t-t 150W HPS LPM3515- (a)(b) Speedy (a) Voltage 8 (b) 0pnons. GEBENALDESIRUPTWL Medium -beam parabolic floodlight luminaire for HID tamp, totally enclosed. Hydroformed aluminum reflector is etched and anodized. Housing is seamless, die -cast aluminum. Aluminum die -cast adjustable fitter mounting is sized for 2' pipe (2-3/8" [60 mm] 0.D.). Allows for directional aiming as well as 2 -1/2° incremental vertical adjustment. Contains integral wiring compartment. Two stainless -steel set screws provide clamping to vertical tenons. Lens assembly consists of rigid aluminum frame and high - impact, clear- tempered glass. FHIISH Exclusive DeltaGuard® finish features an E -coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra- durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven - year limited warranty. 50 -1 (10W MH; 50W HPS) J Tamperproof Lens Fasteners M 120/208/240277V (Standard: 150W PSMH: 175W MH: 70 -150W HPS) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (Standard: 150W PSMH; 70 -175W MH: 70 -150W HPS) 1 120V (Standard: 35W HPS) 2 277V 27 277V Reactor (150W PSMH Only) 3 208V 4 240V 5 480V (175W MH; 70 - 100W HPS) 6 347V (Canada Only) For voltage avadaM4ly outsde the US and Canada. see Bulletin TD-9 or contact your Ruud LigMVq authorized Intemational Distnlxne- ELECTRICAL, Endure includes clear, medium -base lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv -rated screw - shell -type lampholder. Lamp ignitor included where required. All ballast assemblies are high - power factor and use the following circuit types: Reactor (277V PSMH) 150W PSMH Reactor 120V: 35 – 150W HPS HX — High Reactance 50 –100W MH; 50 –150W HPS CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 125 & 150W PSMH; 175W MH LABELS ANSI Tamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in US and Canada for wet locations. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA (0 Ruud Lighting Inc. Pnnted in USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 www.ruudlightng.com -5P External Photocell (for 480V) X Linear Spread Lens - Horizontal Y Linear Spread Lens Vertical Specity (a) Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key PATENT US 4,689,729 ACCESSINIIES; DB -12 Deep Baffle DL-L Internal Louver GS -12 Glare Shield LS-L Potycarbonate Vandal Shield (not for use with fortures in uplight position) PC -1 Button Photocell (tor fixtures set to 120V) PC *6 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 347V) PC-2 Button Photocell (for fixtures set to 208. 240.277V) PGM -1 Ground Mount Post TPS -1 Tamperproof Screwdriver WG-L Wire Guard FAX (262) 884 -3309 12/11/03 RUUD LIGHTING 2' ADJUSTABLE FITTER RECTANGULAR MEDIUM PARABOLIC FLOOD AKA RATING Isofootcandle plots show initial footcandles at grade. (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) A 1.14 for single fixture with 60° tilt (Consult factory for EPA rating on multiple units). 24000 22000 20000 18000 10000 14000 2 12000 3 10000 8000 8000 4000 2000 VERTICAL HORIZONTAL 1 1 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 ANGLE (IN DEGREES) 30 40 Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 9687 Candlepower trace through origin of 175W MH Rectangular Medium Parabolic floodlight. NEMA Type: 4V x 5H. • UUD LIGHTING 40' 30' 40 30' 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 30' 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 30' 40' 12.2 9.2 6.1 3.1 Om 3.1 6.1 9.2 40' 12.2 12.2 9.2 6.1 3.1 0 m 3.1 6.1 9.2 12.2 Isolootcandle plot of 175W MH Medium Parabolic Floodlight at 15' (4.6 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt. (Plan view) 40' 30' 40 30' 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 30' 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 30' 40' 12.2 9.2 6.1 3.1 0m 3.1 6.1 9.2 40' 12.2 12.2 9.2 6.1 3.1 0 m 3.1 6.1 9.2 12.2 Isolootcandle plot of 175W MH Medium Parabolic Floodlight at 20' (6.1 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt. (Plan view) 40' 30' 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 30' 40' 40' 30' 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 30' 40' 40' 12.2 40' 12.2 30' _. .. 9.2 30' z-- --� 9.2 20' 6.1 20' 10' 3.1 10' 0' O m 0' 10' 3.1 10' 20' // 6.1 20' 30' ` .. . //. 9.2 30' 40' 12.2 40' 12.2 9.2 6.1 3.1 0 m 3.1 6.1 9.2 123 Isofootcandle plot of 150W HPS Medium Parabolic Floodlight at 15' (4.6 m) mounting height and 0° vertical lilt. (Plan view) 50' 100' 90' 80' 70' 60' 50' 40' 30' 20' 10' 0' 10' 15.3 40' 30' 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 30' 40' 50' 6.1 3.1 Om 3.1 6.1 9.2 12.2 12.2 9.2 6.1 3.1 0 m 3.1 6.1 9.2 12.2 Isolootcandle plot of 150W HPS Medium Parabolic Floodlight at 20' (6.1 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt. (Plan view) 50' 40' 30' 30.5 100 27.5 90' 24.4 80' 21.4 70' 18.3 60' 15.3 50' 12.2 40' 9.2 30' 6.1 20' 3,1 10' 0m 0' 3.1 10' 12.2 92 6.1 3.1 0 m 3.1 6.1 92 122 153 Isolootcandle plot of 175W MH Medium Parabolic Floodlight at 20' (6.1 m) mounting height and 60° vertical tilt. (Plan view) 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA © Ruud Lighting Inc. Pnnted in USA 20' 10' 0' 10' 20' 30' 40' 50' 153 12.2 92 6.1 3.1 0 m 11 6.1 92 12.2 30.5 27.5 24.4 21.4 18.3 15.3 12.2 9.2 6.1 3.1 Om 153 Isofootcandle plot of 150W HPS Medium Parabolic Floodlight at 20' (6.1 m( mounting height and 60° vertical tilt. (Plan view) PHONE (262) 886 -1900 FAX (262) 884 -3309 www. ruudlighting.cam 12/11,93 c) 1►rrr �a► RECESSED MOUNT 16" (406 mm) RECESSED CANOPY LIGHT Capacitor Ignitor (Where required) Ballast Insulation - Detector - Housing Seamless, die -cast aluminum Finish color. black 1116' (406 mm) -- Reflector Prefinished specular aluminum Lamp (Included) 6.5" (165 mm) Patented Hinge Assembly Lampholder Trim Frame - - - -- Finish color. white 17.3' (438 mm) O.D. Lens High impact, #73 crystal tempered glass PULSE START METAL HALIDE • SPEC # 200W PSMH RC0620- (a)(b) METAL HALIDE SPEC # 175W MH RC0417- {ai(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SPEC « 150W HPS R00515- (a)(b) Specify (a) Voltage 8 ib) Options. Recessed Canopy luminaire for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Reflector is specular aluminum. Housing is seamless, die -cast aluminum. Includes four adjustable steel "L" brackets for mounting to various ceiling thicknesses and four hold down clips to prevent fixture movement during trim installation. Rough -in 16.3' (413 mm) sq. hole required for fixture installation. Two 1/2' (13 mm) conduit openings are provided for wire supply. A maximum of 4 No. 12 AWG (2 in/2 out) through branch circuit conductors suitable for at least 150 °C allowed on fixtures. Fixtures are provided with a UL listed insulation detector, which will deactivate fixture if inadvertently covered with insulation. Lens assembly consists of rigid aluminum frame and high - impact, 173 crystal tempered glass. L Bracket Adjustable for up to 1 -318" (35 mm) ceiling thickness Hold Down Clip Lens Frame Die -cast aluminum door frame secures lens; sealed with silicone gasket Finish color. white VOUAGESSUFFIX.Kl 1 120V (Standard) 2 277V 3 208V 4 240V 6 347V (Canada Only) For voltage avaiadley autsr0e the US and Canada. see Bulletin TO-9 or wfrtct your Ruud Lighting audtonzed International Distributor. ELECTRICAL Fixture includes clear, mogul -base lamp. Pulse - rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv -rated screw- shell- type lampholder with spring - loaded center contact. Fixtures require a minimum 150°C temperature feed wire. Lamp ignitor included where required. Ballast assemblies are high - power factor and use the following circuit types: Hx — High Reactance 150W HPS CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 200W PSMH; 175W MH ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in the US and Canada for wet locations. 9201 Washinntnn Avpntla Rar.ine Wisr.nnsin 534116 -3772 I ISA PHONF 0621 R11R- 14011 Notes °°(b)rprippistl tory-ii alled),, -(a)F Fusing D Quartz Standby (includes 100W quartz lamp) Specify j a j Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key a0.FINISH' Exclusive DeltaGuard• finish features an E -coat epoxy primer, with white ultra- durable powder topcoat for the lens frame and trim frame, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven -year limited warranty. US 4,689,729 LPF -16 PATENT 2 x 2 lay -in Panel FAX (262\ RR4- 3:1114 RUUD RCO -16 SERIES RECESSED MOUNT 16" (406 mm) RECESSED CANOPY LIGHT Me Halide La Watt (Clear) - 36,000 Iumens Le Crystal Tempered Glass Test !stance: 26' (8 m) Certified Test Report Lighting Sciences Inc. No. LSI 5767 20 _ ACROSS -E _ ALO. r 4/ tit #41 Efficiency = 78.0%: SC .1.2; S/MH .1.2 Candlepower Summary Angle Along 22.5 45 67.5 Across LMS 0 10952 10952 10952 10952 10952 5 10885 10907 10953 11005 11041 1047 10 10938 10973 11012 11019 11070 15 11132 11163 11095 10995 10956 3111 20 10845 10828 10814 10718 10393 25 10002 9874 10028 10026 9568 4597 30 8883 8915 9380 9336 8837 35 7846 8096 8700 8734 8243 5268 40 6858 7274 7971 8096 7509 45 5787 6349 7194 7304 6645 5214 50 4595 5268 6305 6330 5742 55 3470 4170 5314 5292 4892 4261 60 25.40 3162 4295 4258 4026 65 1826 2315 3280 3270 3208 2851 70 1262 1621 2342 2384 2425 75 797 1017 1494 1557 1628 1422 80 407 513 772 818 887 85 117 144 216 241 268 296 90 0 0 0 0 0 Z0821 1181111111 and Percentages Zone Lomeas %Lamp %Firer. 0-30 8754 24.32 31.19 0-40 14021 38.95 49.96 0.60 23496 65.27 83.72 0.90 28063 77.96 100.00 40-90 14042 39.01 50.04 60-90 4567 12.69 16.28 90-180 0 0.00 0.00 0-160 28063 77.96 100.00 cients of Utiiization E e Floor Cavity Reflectance = 0.20 cc so 70 50 REFLECTANCES: •- oc . •5 - w • .3 30 10 1 rani 70 5o 30 10 71 50 30 lei se 30 10 se 30 10 50 30 1e' 1 0.86 0.83 0.80 0.77 054 0.81 0.79 0.76 0.78 0.76 0.74 0.75 0.73 0.72 0.72 0.71 0.69 j 2 0.79 0.74 0.70 0.66 0.78 0.73 0.68 0.65 0.70 0.66 0.63 0.67 0.65 0.62 0.65 0.63 0.61 I 3 0.73 0.66 0.80 0.56 0.71 0.65 0.60 056 0.63 058 035 0.61 0.57 0.54 0.59 0.56 0.53 i 4 0.68 0.60 0.5.4 0.49 0.66 0.59 0.53 0.491 0.57 052 0.48 0.55 0.51 0.47 053 0.50 0.47 1 5 0.63 0.54 0.47 0.43 0.61 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.51 0.46 0.42 050 0.45 0.42 0.48 0.44 0,41 I 6 0.58 0.48 0.42 0.37 0.56 0.48 0.42 0.37 0.46 0.41 037 0.45 0.40 0.37 0.44 0.39 0.36 7 033 0.43 037 033 052 0.43 037 032 0.42 0.38 032 0.41 036 0.32 040 0.35 0.32 8 0.50 0.40 0.33 029 0.48 0.39 033 029 0.38 0.33 029 0.37 032 0.28 0.36 0.32 028 9 0.46 0.36 0.30 026 0.45 038 0.30 026 0.35 029 025 0.34 0.29 0.25 0.33 0.28 025 I 10 0.43 033 0.27 023 0.42 0.32 0.27 0.23 0.32 0.25 023 0.31 026 0.23 030 026 0.22 40 36 32 : 2a V O 24 O N. 20 . to c 1$ e so. FT. PER 0 F1%TURE FT. BETWEEN FI[TURES REFLECTANCES: •- oc . •5 - w • .3 .- rc ..2 S /MH • 1.2 SC • 1.2 � RCR • 1 f RCR • 3 ��•r�- r 200 800 1000 1400 1800 1 2200 2500 110 15 20 0 25 30 35 40 45 50 OUICK CALCULATOR: Use this chart to determine the number and spacing of Ruud 16' (406 mm) Canopy Lights with 400W clear MH lamp. Numbers and spacing for other wattages fillm etermined as follows: 175W multiply by 0.39; 250W multiply by 0.57. RUUD 9901 Washinntnn Avpnua Racing Wisr.nnsin 5340Ft-3777 (1SA PH(lNF (2A21 RR6- 14011 FAX (2I 21 RR4 -3409 LOW VOLTAGE tX M 1 sT • LUMA AFTER - SUNSET DIRECTIONAL WELL LIGHT • • • 2.5" (69 mm) 4.8" (121 mm) 8" (203 mm) 5.6" (143 mm) GL23 5 3" (133 mm) Ste LAMP TYPE .WATT SE = CIITNL; El SPEC; PAR36 sr Fc xr7 PAR36 Max50W GL23S -8K Max 50W GL23 -8K 6ERERALDESCRIPTIWi� Directional well light is adjustable. GI 23 moves up and down, GL23S is stationary. Black fixture head is die- formed aluminum; body is extruded PVC; black stainless -steel hardware. For use on ground surface or directly buried. 5.6" (143 mm)� GL23S (178 mm) ELEC181CAL... Fixture utilizes 12V, PAR36 (maximum 50W) lamp with screw terminal base. Pigtail and connector is 18/2 SPT, 60' (152 cm) long, molded polycarbonate, with nickel plated beryllium copper contact pins. :1FBIISR•' �' Exclusive DeltaGuare finish for head features an E-coat epoxy primer with black textured ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven -year limited warranty. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 © Ruud Lighting Inc Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com Notes LABaS UL Listed in the US and Canada for wet locations. ACCESSWIIES For GL23 TAF13 Color Filters (use with TAH13) TAH13 Louver /Filter Holder TAL15 Hex Cell Louver (bath used with TAH13) For GL23S GA -01 -BK Black Cast Aluminum Grate GA-03-8K Black Cast Aluminum Lens Holder TAF4' Convex Lens (use with GA031 •Specdy color: A = Amber. B = Blue, G " Green. 3 " Red. FAX (262) 884 -3309 12/11103 RUUD LIGHTING ALUMINUM — FOR CIRCULAR FIXTURE BOLLARD PANEL IOW '• ' IR cat • • • Conduit Openings 01.1' (29 mm) for 3/4' oondue 36" (914 mm 3.3" (211 mm) (83 mm) SPEC ff- :CATALOG # ; OESCBIPTIOI! 0 SPEC s PACE -(a) Panel for Circular fodure• 'Circular failure ordered separately. Specify (a) Options. }•(a) OPTIWIS;(tactory»Installed) „ s! P Hole for Photocell ACCESSORIES PC -1 Button Photocell (120v) PC -2 Button Photocell (208. 240. 277V) PC "5 Button Photocell (347V) (Canada Ony) Panel 0.063' (2 mm) duck aluminum Finish color. bronze Frame 0.188' (5 mm) thick x 3.3' (83 mm) aluminum Finish wlor bronze — Galvanized Steel Anchor Bolts 3/8' -16 x 6' (152 mm) +1.3' (32 mm) ° GI3IECAC: CNIPTiION Bollard Panel, commonly used to support one circular security light, consists of a heavy gauge aluminum frame with two panels, and is easily assembled with the stainless -steel phillips head fasteners provided. When purchased for use with our Circular Security Light, the fixture slips through an opening on the front panel. Attachment is made by removing the conduit opening enclosure plug at the back of the fixture, and then assembling the fixture to the panel using a single 1/2' -14 NPSM attaching bolt (provided). Two 3/8" -16 x 6" (152 mm) steel anchor bolts are included to secure in a poured concrete base. Suggested poured base: 2' (610 mm) deep x12' (305 mm) dia., depending on soil types and frost line in your area. Two 3/4' conduit openings are provided in the base of the frame, to allow ease of wiring when a fixture is used. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA 0 Ruud Lighting Inc. Pnnted in USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 www.ruudlighting.com PACE:" SERIES Notes FHIISHI' Exclusive DeltaGuard® finish features an E -coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven- year limited warranty. FAX (262) 884 -3309 12/11/03 RUUD LIGHTING CIRCULAR WALL MOUNT PERIMETER CUTOFF c 111 V • 112" Conduit - -. Die -Cast Lens Entry Retaining Ring 0.25" (6 mm)—[ j-3" (76 mm)-77- -- 5.3" (133 mm) Ignitor (Where required) ',i Mounting Hole Knockouts Conduit Entry Back Gasket Housing - Finish odor bronze T_ Reflector and Ballast Cover Assembly 112" Conduit Entry - Ballast 4 8 —Clear and Internally Painted Acrylic Lens Reflector Prefinished Specular Aluminum (224 mm) Lamp (Included) 9.9' Commit entry (725 r n cie. — location - Silicone Sponge - Lampholder Rubber Gasket METAL HALIDE SPEC 4 Wall Downlight 50W MH CE3405- (a)(b) 0 SPEC4 Wall Downlight 70W MH CE3407- (a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM Ei SPEC P Any 35W HPS CE3503- (a)(b) Ei St'EC # Any 50W HPS CE3505- (a)(b) Q SPEC I Wall Downlight 70W HPS CE3507- (a)(b) 0 SPEC # Wail Downlight 100W HPS CE3510- (a)(b) FLUORESCENT 0 SPECW Any 13W FL CE3213- (a)(b) Speafy (a) Voltage & (b) Options. seavam- Aluminum um die -cast ballast housing supplied with two 1/4' (6 mm) knock -outs for #8 Or #10 mounting screws; two sealing washers are provided for watertight mounting. Housing also includes three 1/2° -14 NPT socket drive closure plugs for surface wiring or entry from the back. Neoprene gasketing on the back of the housing provides a watertight mounting seal. Silicone seal bonds the lens to a die -cast aluminum retainer ring, which secures the assembly to the housing. A second silicone seal is provided between lens assembly and housing. Injection molded clear acrylic lens and specular reflector direct light downward to wash the wall below and to the sides of fixture. Extra wide cutoff iodistribution provides glare control and permits maximum spacing between fixtures. —Cmou, envy loaner Back Yew Note: Picture can be rotated 90' to allow for side to side or top to bottom conduit entry Mountlng hare krwdoun D T 120/277V (Standard: 50 - 70W MH) 120r277/347V (Canada Only) (70W MH) 120V (Standard: 13W FL; 35 - 100W HPS) 2 277V (13W FL: 35 - 70W HPS) 3 208V (35 - 70W HPS) 4 240V (35 - 70W HPS) 6 347V (Canada Only) (70W HPS) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin 1D-9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authonzed Interrenonat Ostroutor. Fluorescent fixture includes a 13W quad tube compact fluorescent lamp. HID fixtures include a clear, medium -base lamp and porcelain enclosed, 4kv -rated screw -shell -type lampholder with spring - loaded center contact. Lamp ignitor included where required. All ballast assemblies are normal power factor and use the following circuit types: Preheat (minimum starting temperature -5 °F [- 20 °C]) 13W FL Reactor (120V only) 35 - 100W HPS Reactor/Transformer (208, 240, 277V) 35 - 70W HPS HX — High Reactance 50 -70WMH 8701 Washinntnn Avenue Racine Wisr•.nnsin 5340f -3777 LISA PHf)NF (MI RRA -1900 Notes (b)OPTIONS ea H High Power Factor Ballast J Tamperproof Lens Fasteners -(a)P Photocell V Polycarbonate Lens Specify (a) Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in the US and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP65 per IEC 529 and IEC 598. Exclusive DeltaGuarcr finish features an E-coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven - year limited warranty. TPS -1 Tamperproof Screwdriver FAX (2R2) R114 -3.40q RUUD CIRCULAR WALL MOUNT PERIMETER CUTOFF Side View Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 9911 Candlepower distribution curve of 70W HPS Circular Perimeter Cutoff Fixture. EFFICIENCY = 67.O% Distance In Units Of Mounting Height 2 3 4 5.0 2.0 1 2 3 4 5 Distance In Units Of Mounting Height Isofootcandle plot of 7DW HPS Circular Perimeter Cutoff fixture at 10' (3 m) mounting height. (Plan view) • RUUD Isofootcandle plots show initial footcandles at grade. (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) ANGLE MEAN CP ANGLE MEAN CP 0 1170 95 1320 5 1209 100 1283 10 1228 105 1223 15 1291 110 1033 20 1383 115 762 25 1535 120 383 30 1731 125 170 35 1905 130 121 40 1937 135 49 45 1987 140 25 50 1909 145 16 55 1819 150 16 60 1739 155 30 65 1636 160 40 70 1569 165 40 75 1503 170 8 80 1441 175 3 85 1399 180 2 90 1392 Maximum Candlepower: 1987 Plane of Maximum CP: 45° Vertical Angle of Maximum Candlepower: 45° Lumen Rating: 6400 MOUNTING HEIGHT CONVERSION TABLE Footcandle readings for mounting heights other than 10' (3 m) may be obtained by multiplying fc values by the following: HEIGHT 7.0' (2.1 m) 8.0' (2.4 m) 9.0' (2.7 m) 12.0' (3.7 m) 15.0' (4.6 m) 20.0' (6.1 m) MULTIPLIER 2.04 1.56 1.23 0.69 0.44 0.25 LAMP WATTAGE CONVERSION TABLE Footcandle readings for wattages and lamp types other than 70W HPS may be obtained by multiplying fc values by the following: LAMPNVATTAGE MULTIPLIER 99(11 Washinritnn AVP.ntIP. Racine. Wisconsin 534f1fi -3779 I ISA 13W Fluor 0.13 50W MH 0.48 70W MH 0.79 35W HPS 0.35 50W HPS 0.63 100W HPS 1.51 PHnNF (2671 RRF -1911() FAX (2621 RR4 :6,3(19 • • • DRAFT April 8, 2005 V. SITE MAINTENANCE A. Apollo Landing Property Association (ALPA) will be formed and membership required for all purchasers of lots in the Planned Unit Development. ALPA will be funded by members, will address and be responsible for the following: 1. Pylon Sign and Monument Sign maintenance 2. Main Drive maintenance including landscaping, lighting, asphalt, sidewalkds etc. 3. Stormwater management preservationSnow plowing and removal 4. Irrigation system maintenance B. ALPA members shall agree to grant easements, in writing, to all members regarding utilities, joint access, shared parking etc. Memorandum DATE: April 8, 2005 TO: Paul Bengtson FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Apollo Landing Attached for your use is the TKDA review dated April 8, 2005 for the Apollo Landing project. These items must be addressed before final approval is given to the site. Please contact me at 651/982-2430 with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 TKDA •NGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Apollo Landing/Equinox Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: April 8, 2005 Introduction Comm. No. 13265 -002 Routing: A review dated March 10, 2005 was previously provided for a proposed Planned Unit Development Project (PUD) at the northwest corner of the intersection of Apollo Drive and Lilac Drive. The proposed development would essentially consist of five separate buildings of varied types of use (hotel, restaurant, office /retail, office /commercial) on an 8.1 acre site. &ince the previous review, the following additional items have been received and reviewed: 1. Cover letter dated March 22, 2005 from Mattke Surveying and Engineering, Inc. 2. Spot elevations dated March 17, 2005 for the house located immediately adjacent to the site and existing pond. 3. Existing Drainage Calculations dated March 2, 2005. 4. Rate control calculations dated March 21, 2005. 5. Storm sewer sizing calculations dated March 21, 2005. 6. Full size Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan dated March 21, 2005. Executive Summary Following is a general summary of the main items and issues that must be addressed. Further explanation of these items and additional items to be addressed are provided in the remainder of this review memorandum. • 1. The revised drainage information has been reviewed and is acceptable with the following note: The HWL elevation of the pond furthest downstream (Pond 1) cannot be higher than the smaller upstream ponds. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Apollo Landing /Equinox Page 2 April 8, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 2. Comments regarding a Traffic Study were provided in the previous review. A response has since been prepared and provided. Further comments regarding the traffic study are provided further in this memorandum. 3. A utility plan was provided for the previous review, and no revised copy has been provided. The utility plan as previously presented was stated as acceptable in concept. However, additional details for construction purposes were not provided at that time. In addition, the applicant (in the March 22 letter) suggests some revisions to the plan, and comments are further provided. A final utility plan must be submitted and include storm sewer pipe sizes, structure invert and rim elevations, standard utility plates, details, construction notes, provisions for erosion control, and other pertinent information as required. 4. The applicant previously provided copies of correspondence to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The applicant shall be responsible for assuring compliance with the RCWD accordingly. 5. The proposed site development is located adjacent to two County roadways. The plat and site plan will therefore require the review and approval of Anoka County, both for the plat itself and with regards to driveway and site access. It is likely that the County will have comments with regards to right of way dedication and access from Apollo Drive. If specific improvement adjustments are required by the County (turning lanes, etc.), the applicant shall incorporate such improvements into the plans and install accordingly. 6. Drainage and utility easements must be provided on the Preliminary Plat as previously described. 7. The low floor and/or lowest floor elevation of the existing building on property directly west and adjacent to the pond has been verified against the proposed pond high water and emergency overflow elevations. The pond therefore meets requirements according to the information provided. Drainage • 1. The first floor elevations shown for the proposed buildings would appear to be acceptable based on the information provided. However, because actual building plans are not provided, it is not known if there are proposed to be basements, lower openings, etc. In accordance with City standards, the lowest floor elevation must meet the City's minimum requirement of 2 feet above the 100 year flood level, 4 feet above normal water elevations and groundwater, and at least one foot over the emergency overflow elevation. 2. Long term maintenance responsibilities for the pond and infiltration areas must be eventually be clearly assigned in an Agreement between the City and applicant/future property owner. 3. An NPDES Phase II permit shall be required. All requirements of the Permit, including the submittal of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City, shall be completed prior to engaging in grading activities. Apollo Landing /Equinox Page 3 April 8, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Utilities 1. An internal sanitary sewer main is intended to serve the properties and connect to an existing 6 -inch service at Apollo Drive. The existing 6 -inch PVC connects to an existing 21 -inch trunk main running down Apollo Drive. The existing manhole and service at the property line should be field inspected to verify that the size, condition, and connecting elevations of the existing facilities are adequate. The sewer main for the site itself must be at least 8 -inch diameter in accordance with City standards. A connection or downsizing from 8- inches to 6- inches is typically discouraged. However, if the applicant provides flow calculations and an adequate construction transition detail that assures flow sufficiency and avoidance of future maintenance issues, such a connection can be allowed. 2. The most recent utility plan received proposes to connect a water main to the existing 12 -inch diameter main on Apollo Drive. No size for the main into the Apollo Landing property is shown, and it must be a minimum of 8 -inch diameter. Provisions must be included in the plans for wet tapping to the 12 -inch main and for the connection near the center of Apollo Drive. A permit from the County and establishment of traffic and safety control measures during construction, and repair of the street will be required in accordance with County standards. As an alternative, the March 22 letter from Mattke Engineering suggests connecting to an existing 6- inch hydrant line rather than to the larger 12 -inch main in the street. Because of the property's mixture of higher use development, and per standard City and industry practice, it is recommended that an 8 -inch pipe directly connected to the existing 12 -inch main remain as proposed. As previously mentioned, a revised (final) utility plan must also be submitted. 3. Individual sewer and water services are not shown on the plan. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet. A minimum of two feet of cover over storm sewer pipe is desired. 4. Provisions for a future extension of utility services to the property located immediately adjacent and to the west of the Apollo Landing property have been suggested. It is therefore recommended that water and sewer stubs be extended from the newly installed 8 -inch sanitary sewer and water mains. The stubs would essentially extend to the NE corner of the neighboring property from near the center of the Apollo Landing property. A utility easement at this location should also be established. Other 1. Long term maintenance responsibilities for the development area, including the detention areas must be addressed appropriately in an agreement between the Developer and the City. 2. Apollo Drive and Lilac Drive are under the jurisdiction of Anoka County. The plat and site plans will therefore require the review and approval of Anoka County, both for the plat itself and with regards to driveway and site access. It is likely that the County will have comments with regards to right of way dedication and access from Apollo Drive. At a minimum, right of way dedication will Apollo Landing /Equinox Page 4 April 8, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • • be required at the south end of the property where the streets are located. Typically, the County has requested right of way dedication of up to 60 feet from the center of a roadway, and it is likely that an Agreement with the County will be needed. The proposed driveway entrance will also require a permit from the County. The County may have additional comments with regards to the driveway location, width, turning lanes, etc. 3. Drainage and utility easements are shown on the Preliminary Plat around all detention and infiltration areas. The drive easement should also be designated as a drainage and utility easement. Platted drainage and utility easements adjacent to property lines (10 feet) must also be provided per City requirements. 4. A proposed site landscaping plan has been provided. Screening from adjacent properties is proposed by the use of a Wood Privacy Fence, subject to approval by the City. The Landscape Plan should either include or refer to the Grading Plan the proper establishment around the ponds and infiltration areas. 5. Soil borings generally indicate a soil profile of topsoil underlain by coarse alluvium. For the building foundation and roadway and parking area subgrades, varying amounts of engineering fill and granular material will be required. Recommendations as provided in the Geotechnical Report must be provided throughout construction. 6. In addition to trees and vegetation, the existing site contains various remains of structures and facilities from previous site use (foundations, silos, etc.). All above and below ground abandoned facilities must be removed from site and disposed properly. The removal of any septic, well or other such facilities shall be also subject to the rules and regulations of the State of Minnesota and/or Anoka County as required. 7. A Traffic Study was previously prepared by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik, and Associates (BRAA), and comments for the study were provided in an earlier TKDA review. A Memorandum dated March 9, 2005 has since been prepared by BRAA in response to the TKDA comments. Upon further review, the following comments and questions remain: A. An office development does not typically induce pass -by or diverted trips from existing background traffic. Also, with an office -only scenario, internal trips would be minimal or non- existent. For the office only scenario, it must be stated clearly if pass -by, diverted, and internal trips were added back into the project - generated trips for the a.m. peak hour analysis. B. The traffic study suggests that level of service will improve with the proposed development. It is understandable from a very technical modeling perspective how turn movement levels of service could actually improve under the with- project scenarios. However, this would likely be very difficult to explain during a public review process. It is recommended (if possible) that the future signal timing be modified such that the 0.1 or 0.2 second improvement in average vehicle delay would not appear under the with project scenarios. • • • Recommendations Of the February 23, 2005 Environmental Board Apollo Landing /Equinox Development/Environmental Site Plan Review The February 23, 2005 Lino Lakes Environmental Board made the following recommendations concerning Apollo Landing: Motion to approve the rezoning of the land with the condition of the Environmental Board future review of PUD and review each PUD phase level by O'Connell, 2 "d by Baumann. All were in favor. Marshan Meadows, Bruggeman Properties, 7364 Lake Drive, Preliminary Plat Review. The February 23, 2005 Environmental Board made the following recommendations concerning Marshan Meadows: • Surface Water Plan should show access for pond and infiltration area maintenance. • Surface Water volume calculations for pond and infiltration areas should be verified for adequacy. • Investigate removing storm pipe going into the lake and replace with a swale /rain swale design. • Direct all water from impervious areas to pervious. • Plan must address the 200 -foot area along the lake in terms of NPDES requirements that slopes be stabilized within 7 days in disturbance areas. • A temporary sediment pond diverting water on the SE side of the project would address BMP concerns for containing eroded materials. • A Conservation Easement should be described, for the Shoreland impact zone and the surface water treatment areas. • Signage should be placed at the easement areas describing wetland conservation, no mow, no dumping areas, as well as important natural considerations such as nesting water birds and Blandings Turtle. • An information brochure should be published and given to all property owners describing the Classification and nature of Marshan Lake and that appropriate boating should be confined to non - motorized uses. It should also describe rare species habitat considerations for the area, and conservation easement requirements. • Ponding and infiltration areas should be planted with the City native seed mix. Planting soils should not be incorporated into these areas in order to preserve areas that turtles might still nest. • Curbing in the project should be designed so that turtles can cross roads. (The Lino Lakes Blandings Turtle Modal shows this area as a possible breeding site.) • • • • Transitional native seed mix should be used for 8 -10 feet from all sodded areas. A seed such as Blue gramma should be used for this. • Developer should submit a detailed NPDES plan for using BMP's on this site. For example, the rock entrance should say, "at least 50 feet of rock entrance shall be placed." The developer should indicate where on site the NPDS plan and inspection reports would be located on site. Motion to recommend approval with staff and Environmental Board recommendations by Grundhoffer, 2 "d by Bor. All were in favor. RUUD LIGHTING 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2 3 3.13.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.3 3.0 3310 00 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.33.0 3.0 3.5 3. .3 3., 3.1 3.1 3 1.2 3.9 1.7 3.3 1.3 3.6 3.s 1.9 1.1 3.5 3.3 1.7 1.5 3.z 3.1 1., 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3., 3.3 3.3 3., 1.3 1.o 3., 3., 3., 3., 3. 3.3 3.1 '3.4 7.: 1.3 3.5 '3. �, ,�. 3.5 3.7 '1.1 1.4 3.3 3.2 1.3 3.3 3.3 '3.3 3.3 3.3 1.0 1., '0,3 3.3 3.3 3.o 3., 3.3 3.3 3.3 3. '0.s 3.3 3. 3., 3.1 3.6 3..iR1.3 2.9 3. 3.0 '5.z 3.6 • 3.3 1.1 3.5 • 3.3 1.1 1.2 t 1.6 .3.3 •. Y.3 b.7 3. 3.33.33.1 ?. T3.1 3.s3 3.0 3.2 3. 1.1 3.3 3 1.3 1.3 Y.i,'s ,., 1.3 3.3 3.3 3., 3.3 3.3 3.3 1.5 3.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 1.3 3., 3.3 3.3 3., 3. 1.s 3.s 3.2 1.3. 3.4 3.3 1., 3.3 1., 3., 3.3 3.3 '3., 1.3 3.3 3., 1., 3., 3., 3., 1.3 '3. 3., 3., 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.3 1.3 3.3 '3.3 3.0 1.3 3.3 1., 3.0 3.3 3.3 3.0 1.3 3., .3 1.4 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3., 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 1., 1., 3., 3.3 3.3 3., 3.3 3., 3. 1.3 3.5 3.2 3., 3.3 3., 3., 3.3 3., 1.3 3.3 3., 3.3 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 3.3 3., 3. '3a i.s 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.3 1.3 3.0 1.0 1.0 '3.0 '3.0 1.3 1.0 3.5 3.3 3.3 1.0 1.3 3. .7 3.3 3.7 1.s 3.5 3.8 Y.s is .3 .3 3.3 1.5 1 z 3.2 3.1 1.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.o 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3. 2 1.91.32.637..9 s 1.5 1.13., 3..3.13.,3.33.33 .33.33.,3.33.33.33 .0 3.33.33.33. .a '1.51.0 ,,a 1.9 1.2 61.2.13. 3.33.13.31.31.33.31 .03.33., 3.3 3.3 3.33 .0 3.33. .3 '3.s 3.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 '1.3 3 1., .3 3. 3.3 3.1 3.3 3., 3., 3.3 1., 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3., 3., 3. .1 1.3 1.7 1.5 '1.2 3.6 3.s 3.s s Y.f 1.1 3.3 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3., 3.3 3.3 3. 3.3 3.2 3.7 3 3.3 3.2 1.5 • 3.3 3.1 '3.3 3.3 3.3 3.1 1.1 i., 1 1.3 1.6 3. 215 3.6 3.5 1 3.4 s 3.3 3.5 3.5 0 .3 s 3.2 1.1 3.1 3.3 3.3 '2. s.s 1.2 3.5 3.2 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 3., '3., 1., 3., 3. i .3 1.0 3.3 3., '3. 3.1 '3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.3 1.2 1.3 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 1.3 3., 1., 1., 3.3 3., 3.3 1., 3.3 1., '3.3 1.0 3.0 1.0 PR2640 -M IVIIMITLIPESIERINTNG11119(.1, V' •corn... ®uv+.lxl:3q rsWaC.¢ 10.0X, 2".(113 x."s' wnu 1 • amt, °tee:: �a•aus>,33_>t6^ 3.6 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.7 3.s 3., 3.3 3.3 1., 1., 3.3 3.3 3., 3. i .0 1.1 1.s 3.3 3.3 3.. 3.3 3.0 3., 3.0 3.3 3., 3., 3.3 3., .0 1.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.5 Y. 1.s i.s 3.s 3.1 3., 3.3 3., 3., 1.3 3.i .3 3.3 3.3 3.1 1.1 3.2 3.a 1. 1., 1 1.3 3.s 3.1 3.s 3.3 3.3 3.3 3. 1.0 3.0 3.3 1.1 1.2 3.6 1. -�. 1.1 2.6 .9 3. 3.2 3.1 3.3 1.3 3. 3.3 3., 3.3 3., .0.1 1.s 3.,. s 2.3 1.4 3., 3., 3.3 3., 3., 3.1 3.. 3.6 ®i., i. 3.3 b.3 .1 .s 3.i ., 3.0 3., 3., 3.3 3., 1.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 .s Y.3 '3: Y. 3.4 1.1 .3 .3 3.3 3., 3.3 3., 3.0 3.3 3., 3.1 3., 3.2 3.7 3. 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.z 3.6 1.5 3 3., 3., 3., 3., 3., 3.3 3., 3.0 3., 3.1 3.1 3.3 173 1 3., 3., 3., 3., 3.3 3.0 3.3 3., 3., 3.3 3.1 3.4 3.7 1.2 Y. 3.a ' -.s 3.3 3., 3.3 3., 3., 1.3 3.3 3., 3., 3., 3., 3.1 3.: 3., 3.3 3.s 3.3 3., 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 3., 3., 3.1 '3.1 3.3 3., 3., 3., 3., 3., 3., 3.3 3., 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3., 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 3.3 3., '3., 3.3 3.s 3., 3., 1 3.3 3.s 1.0 1., 3., 3., 1.3 3.0 3., 3., 3., 3 3., 3.3 3.0 3.3 1., 1.0 3., 1.3 3., 3., 3. I. 3., 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.0 3., 3. 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 3., 3.3 3., 3.3 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 3., 3., 3., 3., 1., 1.9 3., 3.3 1.3 3., 3., 1., 3., 3.3 3.s 3.3 3., 3., 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 3., 3., 3., 3.0 3., 1.3 3.3 3., 3., 3.3 3.3 3., 3.3 3.3 3., 3.3 b., 3.3 3., 3. 3.3 3., 3., 3.3 3., 3., 3.3 SE4410 -D 100 W Mx "FRONT" "SIDE" RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES RUUD LIGHTING °M. •°U3°°"' °"" 6,3.0.1.000 ..,w Wmcwxo�MIX.12 6r GRADE US. WIN .u.Fxa FIlmona aii0.∎.mm� m... iu�+'mambu ww w�Yn Wm.�ily� �bw�w swvlqu Wm.Y w ®miawuu. HW m ump.mi Se1i Rim- TG'96T1{i- SQUARE WALL MOUNT 12" (305 mm) PROJECTION CUTOFF al Ballast Sealing Gasket • Housing Finish color: bronze Lampholder Capacitor 0.25" (6 mm) 3.1" (79 mm) — Silicone Gasket Lens Spring -Clip Assembly Hidden from view Lamp (Included) Reflector Prefinished semi - specular aluminum 5 "(127 mm) ❑ 12 "(305 mm) BOTTOM VIEW SPEC # MOUNTING POSITION WATTAGE CATALOG # METAL HALIDE SPEC # Wall Downlight 70W MH SE4407- (a)(b) SPEC # Wall Downlight 100W MH SE4410- (a)(b) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SPEC # Wall Downlight 70W HPS SE4507- (a)(b) SPEC# Wall Downlight 100W HPS SE4510- (a)(b) FLUORESCENT 26W FL SE4226- (a)(b) 32W FL SE4232- (a)(b) 42W FL SE4242- (a)(b) 57W FL SE4257- (a)(b) SPEC # Any SPEC # Any SPEC # Any SPEC # Any Specify (a) Voltage & (b) Options. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Aluminum die -cast housing supplied. Knockouts are provided on the back of the housing for 1/2" conduit entry or for mounting over a single gang box, 4" square or 4" octagon boxes. Two #8 x 1" threaded studs and nuts are provided for mounting over a junction box. Housing also includes 1/2" -14 NPT threaded hubs on four sides for conduit entry. Closed cell neoprene sponge gasketing on the back of the housing provides a watertight mounting seal. Silicone sponge cord gasket between housing and lens ensures a water- and insect -tight seal. Injection molded clear polycarbonate lens and shroud assembly is held in place using a hidden spring clip assembly. Semi - specular reflector directs light downward to wash the wall below and to the sides of fixture. Reflector projects light out and away from fixture. — Polycarbonate Lens 112 " -14 NPT Threaded Hub u Qo 0. I'p0n0 UP ' UP .' —..0411111111■ O 112" -14 NPT Threaded Hub Bronze Polycarbonate Shroud (a) VOLTAGE SUFFIX KEY D M T 1 2 3 4 6L UL 120/277V (Standard: 70 & 100W MH) 120/208/240/277V (Standard:100W HPS) 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (70 & 100W MH; 100W HPS) 120V (26W FL Only) (Magnetic Ballast) 277V (26W FL Only) (Magnetic Ballast) 208V 240V 347V (26 — 57W FL) (Canada Only) 120 — 277V Universal Voltage (Standard: 26 — 57W FL) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin TD -9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authorized International Distributor. ELECTRICAL Fluorescent fixture includes a 26W twin (quad) tube, 32, 42 or 57W triple tube, compact fluorescent lamp. HID fixtures include a clear, medium -base lamp and porcelain enclosed, 4kv- rated screw -shell -type Iampholder with spring - loaded center contact. Lamp ignitor included where required. HID and FL electronic ballast assemblies are high -power factor, FL magnetic are normal power factor and use the following circuit types: Reactor (120V HPS) 70 & 100W HPS HX — High Reactance 70 & 100W MH; 100W HPS Preheat – Magnetic (minimum starting temperature 32 °F [0 °C]) 26W FL Electronic (120 – 277V Universal Voltage & 347V) (minimum starting temperature 0 °F [- 18 °C1) 26 – 57W FL 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 SE4 -12 SERIES Notes (b) OPTIONS (factory - installed) -(a)F J -(a)P 0 Fusing Tamperproof Lens Fasteners Photocell Quartz Standby (includes 100W quartz lamp) (N /A on 277V Reactor) Specify (a) Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key RED FEB 2 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES LABELS ANSI lamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in the US and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP54 per IEC 529 and )ES 598. FINISH Housing is standard with our exclusive DeltaGuard® finish, featuring an E -coat epoxy primer with bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven -year limited warranty. ACCESSORIES TPS -1 Tamperproof Screwdriver FAX (262) 884 -3309 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com 01/08/04 RUUD LIGHTING 6' EXTENDED POLE MOUNT 16" (406 mm) PARKING /ROADWAY LIGHT • Ankrq Ballast Capacitor Ignitor (Where I--6" (152 mm) required) Cord 24 "(610 mm) long Housing Seamless, die -cast aluminum Finish color: bronze 016" (406 mm) Reflector Hydroformed aluminum with brightened and anodized finish Extended Pole Mount Finish color bronze SPEC # WATTAGE CATALOG # PULSE START METAL HALIDE SPEC # 200W PSMH PR2620- (a)(b) 250W PSMH PR2625- (a)(b) 320W PSMH PR2632- (a)(b) 350W PSMH PR2635- (a)(b) 400W PSMH PR2640- (a)(b) METAL HALIDE SPEC# 175W MH PR2417- (a)(b) SPEC # 250W MH PR2425- (a)(b) SPEC # 400W MH PR2440- (a)(b) SPEC # SPEC # SPEC # SPEC # HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM D SPEC # 250W HPS PR2525- (a)(b) Q SPEC# 400W HPS PR2540- (a)(b) Specify (a) Voltage 8 (b) Options. • GENERAL DESCRIPTION Parking lot and roadway luminaire for HID lamp, totally enclosed. Supplied with IES Type III (250W MH is field adjustable to Type II) optical system. Housing is seamless, die -cast alumi- num. Mounting consists of a 1.8" (44 mm) wide by 4.5" (114 mm) high by 6" -(152 mm) long extruded aluminum arm. The arm is held in place with two 3/8° (9 mm) mounting rods fastened to a steel backing plate inside the pole, and by two nuts inside the fixture housing. Mounting rods are provided with sealing washers to prevent water leakage. Lens assembly consists of rigid aluminum frame and high- impact, clear- tempered glass. Ballast Compartment Cover Patented Hinge Assembly 6.5" (165 mm) Lamp (Included) Lampholder Lens Frame Die -cast aluminum door frame secures lens; sealed with silicone gasket Finish color: black (a) VOLTAGE SUFFIX KEY M 120/208/240/277V (Standard) T 120/277/347V (Canada Only) (Standard) 1 120V 2 277V 27 277V Reactor (PSMH Only) 3 208V 4 240V 5 480V 6 347V (Canada Only) For voltage availability outside the US and Canada, see Bulletin T0-9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authorized International Distributor. ELECTRICAL Fixture includes clear, mogul -base lamp. Pulse -rated porcelain enclosed, 4kv -rated screw - shell -type lampholder with spring- loaded center contact. Lamp ignitor included where required. All ballast assemblies are high -power factor and use the following circuit type: Reactor (277V PSMH) 200 – 400W PSMH CWA — Constant Wattage Autotransformer 200 – 400W PSMH; 175 – 400W MH; 250 – 400W HPS ANSI Tamp wattage label supplied, visible during relamping. UL Listed in US and Canada for wet locations and enclosure classified IP65 per IEC 529 and IEC 598. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com Notes (b) OPTIONS (factory- installed) -(a)F -(a)P -5P Q Fusing Button Photocell External Photocell (for 480V) Quartz Standby (includes 100W quartz lamp) (N/A on 277V Reactor) Specify (a) Single Voltage — See Voltage Suffix Key RECE ED I FEB 282005 CITY OF LINO LAKES Exclusive DeltaGuard® finish features an E -coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra- durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven - year limited warranty. PATENTS US 4,689,729 ACCESSORIES FWG-16 Wire Guard SBL -16 Backlight Shield FAX (262) 884-3309 12/11/03 RUUD LIGHTING PR2 -16 SERIES 6" EXTENDED POLE MOUNT 16" (406 mm) PARKING /ROADWAY LIGHT 4K0.95 for single fixture with 0° tilt (Consult factory for EPA rating on multiple units). RATING Isofootcandle plots show initial footcandles at grade. (Footcandles _ 0.0929 = Lux) Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 10473 Candlepower distribution curve of 400W MH Parking/Roadway Light Lighting Sciences Inc. Certified Test Report No. LSI 4941 Candlepower distribution curve of 400W HPS Parking/Roadway Light Pole- spacing Example Data Catalog # Lamp Type PR2417 -M 175W MH PR2425 -M 250W MH PR2440 -M 400W MH PR2525 -M 250W HPS PR2540 -M 400W HPS 100' 80' 100' 8■' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 80' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 30.5 24.4 18.3 12.2 - 6.1 - 0m 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 100' ' 30 5 305 24.4 183 12.2 6.1 Om 61 122 183 24.4 305 Isofootcandle plot of 250W MH Parking/Roadway Light at 25' (7.6 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100' 30.5 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 I 24.4 30.5 0 m 61 122 183 24.4 30.5 Isofootcandle plot of 250W HPS Parking/Roadway Light at 25' (7.6 m) eigh+ and,0cttical tilt R`hn FEB 2 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES Lamp Lumens 12,000 20,000 32,000 28,500 50,000 Mounting Height 15' (4.6 m) 20' (6.1 m) 20' (6.1 m) 25' (7.6 m) 25' (7.6 m) 30' (9.1 m) 20' (6.1 m) 25' (7.6 m) 25' (7.6 m) 30' (9.1 m) 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100 30.5 60. 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 O m 6.1 24.4 18.3 12.2 6.1 Om 61 12.2 18.3 24.4 30 5 122 183 24A 30.5 Isofootcandle plot of 400W MH Parking/Roadway Light at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) 100' 80' 100' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 30.5 _�! •i_ -lam 30.5 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 O m 24.4 18.3 122 61 Om 81 12.2 18.3 24 4 30 5 6.1 122 183 24.4 30.5 Isofootcandle plot of 400W HPS Parking/Roadway Light at 30' (9.1 m) mounting height and 0° vertical tilt (Plan view) I' Test area is centered within a (16) pole layout. Max. Recommended Pole- spacing XxY 90' (27.4 m) x 60' (18.3 m) 120' (36.6 m) x 80' (24.4 m) 120' (36.6 m) x 80' (24.4 m) 150' (45.7 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 150' (45.7 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 180' (54.9 m) x 120' (36.6 m) 120' (35.6 m) x 80' (24.4 m) 180' (54.9 m) x 120' (36.6 m) 150' (45.7 m) x 100' (30.5 m) 180' (54.9 m) x 120' (36.6 m) Average Initial Light Levels at Grade 2 Fixtures per pale @ 180° (Footcandles + 0.0929 = Lux) Footcandles Lux 3.97 43 2.15 23 3.60 39 2.22 24 3.56 38 2.41 26 4.94 53 3.08 33 5.41 58 3.67 40 1111UUD LIGHTING 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 FAX (262) 884 -3309 www.ruudlighti ng.com 12/11/03 REC IV FEB 2 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES I STEEL CROWN-WELD' POLES • • • Square, ma-tapered pole Carbon steel base plate 12" (305 Men) Pole cap (Supplied if tenon is not used) 2 "x 6" (51 mm x 152 mm) Hand hole Hand -hole cover Two-piece steel base plate cover Slotted anchor bon hole SPEC # CATALOG # POLE SIZE Square Steel Poles H (ft) x W (fn) x Wall (in) Lj SPEC # PS3S10C(a)BZ 10 x 3 x 0.125 Er SPEC # PS3S15C(a)BZ 15 x 3 x 0.125 Q SPEC # PS3S19C(a)BZ 19 x 3 x 0.125 Q SPEC # PS4S10C(a)BZ 10 x 4 x 0.125 11 SPEC # PS4S15C(a)BZ 15 x 4 x 0.125 SPEC # PS4S19C(a)BZ 19 x 4 x 0.125 Q SPEC # P54S22C(a)BZ 22 x 4 x 0.125 E SPEC # PS4S25C(a)BZ 25 x 4 x 0.125 SPEC # PS4S25S(a)BZ 25 x 4 x 0.188 Q SPEC # PS4S27C(a)BZ 27 x 4 x 0.125 SPEC # PS4S30S(a)BZ 30 x 4 x 0.188 Q SPEC # PS5S25S(a)BZ 25 x 5 x 0.188 Q SPEC # PS5S30S(a)BZ 30 x 5 x 0.188 Q� SPEC # PS6S30S(a)BZ 30 x 6 x 0.188 ea l SPEC # 1 configuration. El SPEC # GENERAL DESCRIPTION Non - tapered steel poles are supplied with welded base with cover, four galvanized anchor bolts, masonite mounting template and a pole cap (except tenon mount). Each bolt is provided with two washers and two nuts. Steel pole base has slotted holes. Per National Electrical Code requirements, pole is standard with a 2° x 6" (51 x 152 mm) hand hole, located 12° (305 mm) above bottom of pole base. A #10 -32 stainless - steel weld stud with grounding lug is located inside pole, opposite hand hole; a hand hole cover is supplied but shipped separately. For EPA ratings, see "Windloading" sheet. PATENT:;:' >; US 5,820,255; 6,640,517 H (m) x W (mm) x Wall (mm) 3.0 x 76 x 3 4.6 x 76 x 3 5.8 x 76 x 3 3.0x102 x3 4.6 x 102 x 3 5.8x102x3 6.7x102 x3 7.6x102 x3 7.6 x 102 x 5 8.2 x 102 x 3 9.1x102 x5 7.6x127x5 9.1x127 x5 9.1x152x5 Notes (a) POLE CONFIGURATION 1 -N 2 H Single (direct mount) Twin ®180° (direct mount) 5 ael Triple (direct mount) 6 + Quad (direct mount) 3 le Twin © 90° (direct mount) T Tenon (order tenon separately) For fixtures with fixed 20° mount, add prefix 2 to configuration numbers: i.e. 21, 22, 23, 25 and 26. MATERIALS Square, non - tapered pole of structural steel tubing (ASTM A 500); with a minimum yield strength of 46,000 p.s.i. Welded to a formed carbon steel base plate with a minimum yield strength of 36,000 p.s.i. FINISIL Exclusive DeltaGuard® finish features an E -coat epoxy primer with medium bronze ultra - durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. The finish is covered by our seven -year limited warranty. 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA PHONE (262) 886 -1900 LABELS Ruud Lighting square poles meet or exceed National Electrical Code Requirements. In the US, Ruud square poles are classified by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. for electrical ground bonding; in Canada, they are CSA certified for electrical ground bonding and structural strength. ACCESSORY Catalog # REC -GFIBZ (120V) Wet Listed In -use cover FAX (262) 884 -3309 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com 9/1/04 GFI Outlet Accessory RUUD LIGHTING PS SERIES STEEL CROWN- WELD" POLES IIIP3S1OC(a)BZ 10' (3.0 m) x 3" (76 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.50' (13 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4 " -10 x 18' (457 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 200 lbs. (91 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 58 lbs. (26 Kg) PS3S15C(a)BZ 15' (4.6 m) x 3' (76 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4 " -10 x 18' (457 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter -10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight -175 lbs. (79 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 82 lbs. (37 Kg) PS4S25S(a)BZ 25' (7.6 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4' -10 x30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 325 lbs. (148 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 252 lbs. (114 Kg) PS4S27C(a)BZ 27' (8.2 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4'-10 x 30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 200 lbs. (91 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -195 lbs. (89 Kg) PS3S19C(a)BZ 19' (5.8 m) x 3' (76 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4" -10 x 18' (457 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter -10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11" (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight -150 lbs. (68 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 92 lbs. (42 Kg) PS4S10C(a)BZ 10' (3.0 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4 " -10 x 18' (457 mm) + 3" (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter -10' (254 mm) 9.3' -11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight -300 lbs. (136 Kg) •oximate shipping weight - 78 Ibs. (35 Kg) 15C(a)BZ 15' (4.6 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wail thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4'10 x30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 300 Ibs. (136 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -119 Ibs. (54 Kg) PS4S30S(a)BZ 30' (9.1 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -3/4'10 x 30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 250 lbs. (113 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -301 lbs. (137 Kg) PS5S25S(a)BZ 25' (7.6 m) x 5' (127 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -1' -8 x 36' (914 mm) + 4' (102 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.7' - 11.3' (248 mm - 287 mm) Maximum fixture weight -450 lbs. (204 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -320 lbs.(145 Kg) PS5S30S(a)BZ 30' (9.1 m) x 5' (127 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate -10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts -1'-8 x 36' (914 mm) + 4' mm (102 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10' (254 mm) 9.7' -11.3' (248 mm - 287 mm) Maximum fixture weight -375 Ibs. (170 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 379 lbs. (172 Kg) PS4S19C(a)BZ 19' (5.8 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125" (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4' -10 x30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter -10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 280 lbs. (127 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -144 Ibs. (65 Kg) PS6S30S(a)BZ 30' (9.1 m) x 6' (152 mm) Wall thickness - 0.188' (5 mm) Base plate - 12' (305 mm) square x 1' (25 mm) thick Anchor bolts- V-8 x 36' (914 mm) + 4' (102 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 11.5' (292 mm) 11.3' - 12.8' (286 mm - 324 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 525 lbs. (238 Kg) Approximate shipping weight - 457 lbs. (207 Kg) PS4S22C(a)BZ 22' (6.7 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0.125' (3 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4" -10 x30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter - 10" (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight- 240 lbs. (109 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -163 lbs. (74 Kg) PS4S25C(a)BZ 25' (7.6 m) x 4' (102 mm) Wall thickness - 0125' (5 mm) Base plate - 10' (254 mm) square x 0.750' (19 mm) thick Anchor bolts - 3/4' -10 x 30' (762 mm) + 3' (76 mm) Bolt circle diameter -10' (254 mm) 9.3' - 11' (235 mm - 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight - 210 Ibs. (95 Kg) Approximate shipping weight -182 Ibs. (83 Kg) !RUUD LIGHTING 9201 Washington Avenue Racine, Wisconsin 53406 -3772 USA RECEIVE FEB 2 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES PHONE (262) 886 -1900 FAX (262) 884 -3309 © Ruud Lighting Inc. Printed in USA www.ruudlighting.com 9/1/04 ar,laano.. 1lpZNaCAl1e- rm?s1141tAltt 11 r 71511 t9 ' t 1r ' t� it 2.211A1 e r I. IC t11. "111111... Warr tl t .11410 %f •l 1 iO !'i at._ r a. er 411114110111111 • inn= , '1=1 SZSEI 0=:1 Eardilliiiit EIE MIE w%EWSIIt -�_� AiSalfs Jr! P <iD.4 VtartfD n os:su£ et n so EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 146° =11-0, EQUINOX DEVELOPMENT liar WNW" `f tB.^.'F.Fdr z ttl.� 'MEAN FRI ...„ .......... .. ..„„.• r'-, .-- ...... ,, . ......... 20.4004.;,...1;.....,...zi......7 .....r".....915.;-01.Nit:itiTK ''"" \ s.' 1., .... '441.11145VEeAr 2111'r C0* = mr ... / KItuas tow me S85116.0 '4-7; 660.0101'0! Kir_ 'Cr It . - ...E. 112E. oir. " •,- et, r.it4 , es. •, 44. . „„. ........ x.• 10.44: ewe, te• 0., .*t.,1*.... 0. ele SE i \ • war p0.444.) \ etrek 020. ce...... x.,:a0.02-414. or /.... 1.14(14 Cew ■. -1, -... wet , , i .34•1104.1.11.... .., • r KOKK00;111.% C. 'IIS" OK :..., ill . ) ''r c4hr T j b.. . / 01. O. *0e a\. (o ow K 0r 0. i esno ad 10 0* 0140049...• ow49990. / 0 15. 0. --.1. K ri E •,..... B .. I/ 91 WI'S?0•1112. 0" ,,,E. 441121\ In -we K ..."...,eleet.\ " of O. or SS 49. 01 i.e• UK fir 511 •K' o Z niup Pim --906. --- ... 43' 700 2 15. Pine 10. i• Pp• (0• 09. rc ir N89.00'03W 312.21 „.. • • • '01 xu"' 8I7'079 • • •e• Pine K xece ook) \-974 09- ‘20. W. lir 9E 901. K .tE• E. 312' K ec 029• 00,i- weft" • 97999 K ItI7* 0120' K K w10.111---we K 010.1K 0W K.. K 2l111.,K K K ...... .... X i5. Pine ........ 9. 00. 09 fr 04er 1a. 0,r• K N ... 0/c... 0.00 r ---s ) ' 4"4...., 1 020. c...xebrett 7.17.1 74 --. .\,,v ....-- '0.0--ra • ; „,„.ttia Um wr top/ /Lx.....i° X18. c.o .. 949-04. V/ 41;''. 0,s. Ur 827, /09- 114 / x ...:10' tri C3..::: ... ;._ ....... 170/...... M ( 0./C 9. SE 1 \ .,, .7. K / \ ;\ j 1 / \ ( s-- - ---. \ ni.-.. ) ,,-, \ k / \rr 0 - owe- ) •••-• / N I \ w281 K 00-112' " 80. 07 012. et A10. ec *44-01 et0.0. 870.94 10. K .12. ,,, 11" .59,•et 9.• a. / k in. ica• Lon sr) ar .. ........ ; .•, /0-91? ....... ........ •rr 8 -"LT SheillIf, ; Z 043 EN OcC * / ' -- - . ....... -906 ................... ..C.P 4 .."-.‘ .. .--- .. -904 ......... ------,':1 s3.1 ". mt. et 906-- r 0.• K r \ a ter N • W w. 0.00 0* •••••• we W. rE' 111. Pia NC ••••■• •--- < -------------- .............. ...... / ...... . ............................... . • 9C6 .............. .... 43 . 991 • ,F,// i• a .• 4:r4/9 ..9E/9011 S7 "ley' 883 22 ....... Liac.Drive N89-00•03-w 180.00 ste- ....... . . t -0 g L 0. 0 / - / / / / Total Site Area e. 348,883 SF = 8.01 Acres Net Slte Area a 340,284 SF a 7.81 Acres , 213..1.293 8 „, - '•(n - .01 ;.)4, 15 / 6! -4 ke.r RI, 907 10 ,7.• 910 79 .1111 0031 NOTE: ANY UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTILITIES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 0wew ■• :0 et 3C580 .• 00230 • • ''• . 0,0 goici ----<---- ept GRAPHIC SCALE 25 50 110 ( ia FEET ) Lech • 50 It Property Deseriptiee: FILE COPY Parcel A That pert of the West 660.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quieter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka C.ounty. Minnesota lying South of the North 500.00 fea and North of the South 500.00 feet thereof according to the US Government Survey, Anoka County, 5.4inoesouL AND That part of the West 500.00 feet of the South 500.00 feet f the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Tweeted* 31, Range 22, Anoka County, 141911291011., lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest Comet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence Easterly along the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quintet a distance of 320.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the the to be detailed: thence Northerly at • right mg*, a distance of 500.00 feet and them terminating. subject to easements of mord, if any. and road right of way. Parcel B That pan of the East 160.00 feet of the %at 660.00 feet of the South 500.00 feet f the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, according to the US Government Survey thaw( Anoka County, Minnesota, lytott North of a line bent' g 50.00 foot North of the centerline of public street described as follows: Commencing at the South Quarter Coma of said Section 8, TOWEIship 31, Range 22; thence on all assumed bearing of West along the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quartet a distance of 836.79 Lea to the point of beginning of the =tali= to be descrthed; thence Northeasterly 1124.51 feet along the arc of a nocetangential curve, concave to the Soutlxast, having a central angle of 78 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds, and a radius of 818.51 feet, the long chord of which bears North 67 degrees 05 reroutes 31 seconds East 1038.14 feet; thence South 73 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 221.72 feet, more or 033, 10 the centerline of Lake Drive sal there terrninaung; subject to easements of record, if any. I ..le,eby Eert fy ',not •.••■-s survey was pre00790 Acci ricNs / 9F.'1si0N3 by Te or under my 0.rec I 30per47sion, 0110 ,.. 'SC ['Arr. 1)-N,N lo-4.o APPVL COMMEN TS 17,01 1 007 0 cluiy L■censec Land Surveyor I I • tEedef the :a.s 00 tne State of M■rilesoto I . --,-- I 1 ' 1 1 .....e../ e.). h..72. A,k LIE Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 7671 Central A..erue NE PriG!ey, MN 65432 (512) 783-0300 Equinox Development. UP AuTrIORI TY 425 Arrowhead Drive. atE Apollo Landing Existing Conditions PROJECT TITLE RA-41NC TITLE Lino Lakes. MN 58014 (812) 408-2826 ORA" CACD APPROVED, re1.11_-..- w•Est I ORAWING OF Dump9& to M N M W to 0 0 z S89'06'04'E 660.01 ton :a 24 -'1'8"' n 16,656 SE 60 100 Spaces 2 Dumpsters 11,000 SF 200 1111111l °II 69 Spaces 19 24 20 4saIIi!�li 20 24 76---TO- 24 20 Our-tipster 19 Spaces 0 ID 3,480 SF 58 20 24 18 N tr n N to m N89 00'03"W 322.21 18 19,600 SF 70 0 04 30 10 n n to S00'44'4 9 "W 0 0 0 z Lilac Drive 54 Spaces 90 6.750 5F / 01/ Detention Pond / / N89 00'03'W 180.00 NOTE: ANY UTIUT1ES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTIUTIES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR 888.51 L =233.39 11= 1573' Notes. 1. Al' Perk no Stc $ 9'418' u0, ttmg 2. A0 PCr4'rg Stan's 9'.20' Esc -:o -End 3. A.' Dn a 'sles 24' N,dtn (Except Mc n Ertr,) 4 AA Pcr4ing 5et00L,s 10 5. 0. Bnud ng Setosc.s 30' 6. A•I 9. 'd•ngs -eve m,r•n'.,m o' 6' from 3.48 :718 10 du'id'1g GRAPHIC SCALE 00 SITE DATA J.AND USE GUIDE PLAN Existing: Commercial ZONINQ Existing: Rural Proposed: General Business SITE AREA CALCULATIONS. Lot Area Minimum Required (GB): Proposed: Lot Width Minimum Required (GB): Proposed: Existing Pervious/Impervious Areas Impervious area: Pervious area: 'O0 Total Area: ( !N FEET ) 1 inch - 50 It. Total Sit. Area - 348,883 SF • 8.01 Acres Existing Impervious Arrest Apollo Drive Imp. Area . 4.879 SF Other Imp. Area w 3,710 SF Total Impervious Area • 8,389 SF - 0.19Acres SETS_ CK DATA 20,000 SF 20.000 SF 100 FT 100 FT 8,389 SF (0.19 Acres) 2.4% 340,494 SF (7.82 Acres) 97.6% 348,883 SF (8.01 Acres) 100% Proposed Pervious/Impervious Arms. Pervious Area Required Minimum: 87,221 SF (2.00 Acres) 25.0% Proposed 102,950 SF (2.36 Acres) 29.5% Perimeter Areas 88,150 SF (2.02 Acres) 25.3% Hotel Landscaping 3,800 SF (0.09 Aces) (.o% Islands and peninsulas 11,000 SF (0.25 Acres) J _ �! Impervious Area: i0 Maximwa Allowed 261.662 SF (6.01 Acres) 75.0% Proposed: 245,933 SF (5.65 Acres) 70.5% Building Pad Areas: 57,886 SF (1.33 Acres) 16.6% Total Arm 348,883 SF (8.01 Aces) 100% RECEIVED JAN i o 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES Proposed: Front Yard Building Local Street Collector or Arterial Street Parking Side Yard: Building: Parking: Rear Yard: Building: Pig: PROPOSED BUILDING DATA Hotel (SO Units): Nei (..Square Feet Parking Required: 98 Spaces Proposed: 100 Spaces Retail/Of5ce/Cora ercial 34,080 Square Fen Parking Required: 153 Spaces Proposed: 186 Spaces 30 Feet 40 Feet 15 Feet 30 Feet 10 Feet 30 Fen 10 Feet tILt Restaurant: 6,750 Square Feet Parking Required: /I Spaces Proposed: 54 Spaces a. l7 211 jM,1lj0 liketag. Maximum Structure I (eight: 45 Fen COpy nereny certify !not Ms survey Dos pre00red I A001 TTCNS by .rte or under my direct S, 2erv;s'on, end yC cATr +RWN 101,04PP'4 %not eel c duly L.censed Lend Sunayor T v, SONS COMMEN TS under the lows of the State of Mfnnesote. Ilk Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 767'1 Cen;rcl Alen a NE FnCle). MN 55432 (612) 783 -0300 Equinox Development. LLP Lino Lake*, MN 55014 ALTHCRITY 425 Arrowhead DrM, �E (612) 408 -2826 PRO.;ECT TITLE Apollo Landing :0 AWING TITLE Site Plan r'.t44# r. Ann APPROIrn East I _ . _ _- -_, DRAwiNG I ........ „ • • 1-1 910 tiosN'y. FF 914, c /r--_ 0 /: r t-906 902 904 898 896 / / Liac/.7Drive • ........... • 08 NOTE: ANY UTIUTIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION ANO MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UllUTIES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE LOCATION OF SUCK /11 ' Been.. C9 RE 905.86 Inv 2 ,n . ...... Keen 905 T .... GRAPHIC SCALE ■ 6 FEET t Inch - 50 tt. 010C2C24001220:1 Silt/once FILE COPY RECEIVED JO 1 0 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES • I hereby cert.'y that this pan, specohcatIon, or report rtoS veparea by me or under y 0■rect supervIsoon, ana tnot orn 0 duly L■censea Profesi■onol Engineer under the Sete of Minnesota Statutes. Sections 326 02 to 326 16. 4) 'read 6, Vatthe. P E. Cate: faisa/47,/ Winn License No.15612 A001T.CNS CATE bRWN .014K0 r PP,01 REvist cNs 004.41105 is Mattke N' Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 7671 Certrci Avenue NE ■71-,01ey, UN 55432 (612; 783-030C ipARucrt:EccRiry 9RAwING Grading, DrsacAinuagle=ac50Er, Erosion 4 7 ion Control Ptar riaz ()PAM. CACO APPROVED ,Wkt DRAWING CF C•4•g. n ha IT I? /71 AI& Equinox Development, LLP 425 Arrowhead Drive. PE Una Lakes, MN 55014 (812) 408-2826 T1ILE Apollo Landing • • a5 r7 589'06'04 "E 860.01 256.50 w 0! 1 90.365 sq. ft. 2.07 acres N89'00'03 "W 322.21 251.01 2 54,940 sq ft 1.26 acres Lilac Drive r at Y 0 9600 3 0 0 0 c N e 152.50 3 20,000 sq. ft. 0.46 acres 4, a! 152.50 S89'15'11 "E 248.50 82.1'2 se. ft. 1.89 acres Eus!-nq Easement L ne __.7150 SF._. ve. Easement L.ne ', 1 — — T T — -\ I ) 9.268 5' \ .196.38 J■l2'56'09 ;� 5 92.848 sc. R. 2'3 acres N89'C0'03 "w R =868.51 L =106.59 6.7'01'54' 123.04 0 0 N89 00'03 "W 180.00 NOTE: ANY UTIUTIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTIUT1ES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE LOCATION OF SUCH. I ) 7150 SF -' �; R■868.51 L- 233.39 x1573'48" • -4 cs.0 t. n M 0 (/1 n M S00'44'49 -W GRAPHIC SCALE ( IF FEET ) 1 Inch 50 ft Total Site Area - 348.883 5F 8.01 Acres RECEIVED JAN 1 0 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES nereoy cerhly :not lnis survey .as prepared by me or under my direct supernsion. and that am a culy..censed Land surveyor under ine � 'an! O1 ire State of Minnesota ADDIroh5 / RE`A5IO'S d Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. Equinox Development, LLP Una Lakes. MN 55014 AL-yHOR■ry 425 Anown.od Drive. }E (612) 408 -2826 NO ( DATE .7RwN. C,k0.APPVO COMMENTS PRO..ECT T1TLE Apollo Landing I 1 7671 Central Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 t 6' 2) 783 -0300 ORAVnNO T,TLE Preliminary Plat i I DRAWN CADD APPROVED TM! SCALE: 1"=50' CHECKED DATE 12/21/041___ ORANC OF I 3 I 7 Teed W Ncttse. .S •4�., i 1 • FF 911.0 t_ 3 FF 912.0 111111111 46 %11111 111 Inv. 900.79 O 4 FF 912.5 Budding5 I Normal Pond 902.20 100 —Y.ar 908.24 Lilac Drive • / NOTE: ANY UTIUTIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTIUTIES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN THE LOCATION OF SUCH. 7 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) Inch 50 ft Fi E • RECEIVED JAN 1 0 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 hereoy certify that th's survey ecs prepared Sy me or under my direct supervision. and :hat Om a duly .icensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stole of Metnesota. ADDITIONS REv1SIONS NO DATE DnAtv C :KO. APP%Dh COMMENTS Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. )'1.sc. Tecd W. MOttke. _S Date fs/L /Wr V;nn L. cams. No :'61? • 7671 Cenvcl Avenue NE Fricley, MN 55432 (612) 753 -0300 AU '1.401,H TY Equinox Development, UP Uno Lakes. MN 55014 (612) 406 -2525 425 Arrowhead Drive. g PRO.EC' TITLE Apollo Landing DRAWING nTLE Utility Plan DRAWN CACD APPROVED T.Mj SCALE 1". co' CRAMNG I OF c • • u 1- Treated Wood Privacy Fence Sod u Dumpster Oumpsters 2 1111111111 4&111111 u Dumpster 4 Treated Wood Privacy Fence Treated Wood 5 Lilac Drive NOTE: ANY UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UT1UTIES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR Tr1 MIT•iN Tun' 1 rte. • Tlru1 K C+ lr• Notes: 1. Entire site will be stabilized against erosion. 2. Parking islands will have 2' wood chips over landscape fabric. 3. Custom Landscape Plans will be developed for each individual building. 4. Main Drive Isle including islands and sidewalk will be constructed in first phase. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch - SO tt. 3 Marshall Seealess .:fern s f RECEIVED JAN 1 0 2005 CITY OF UNO LAKES • • I nereoy cerh'y toot tn.s surrey eas prepared &D01TION$ REASONS ay me 0' anger my a.re[t Super' Son, and NC I C''E 'RwN C'!KD. APPVC that I ar.'. a duly i. ;Censed -and Su•veyor I 1 I dl urger the ,ows o' the Sc(. : of M�nneseto i I )`1.31e. I Tacd w Maltke, .S COMMENTS Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 7671 Centro! Avenue NE , r.iley. MN 5 432 (612) 783 -0300 Equinox Development, LLP Uno Lakes, IAN 55014 AUiHCRITY 425 Arrowhead Drive, OE (612) 408 -2626 DRC- CT TIT Apollo Landing DR,muG nTLE Landscaping Plan ............... ..... 01r fe 070• St a.194.104 l 0Vor 70' or 0r 066 IV " r °yr 40• BE 07' 0* 0.04041% X • K SC XV at " "FE7.9,,t0:P, X V 9 0.65 10.15 SC 9011 90950 909.00N V K 45% — 01 ift 1V St 026 IC " 0r tir 908-- -906. ISL 4.TA:02. 9o• It 0.01 WA: IL —t- 7' • / *SOAK ./ *It 0 / X.. OM 0 ../ .. -, Ci'... x V •I. 7100 . r 94* 0." IMP se /..- PI et / 1 91 / r .0. 908 50 4 a ILI 909 84 9 909.34\910.25 9.38 1 l% 7/1■0 / F12.5 217 11.6 / r ft 00 OS 9 .7V 01 ......... FF 911.00 91/2 r 95 11 45 910 82 St 0 902 898 96 ........ 906- ....... 306- Lijlaci-Drive NOTE: ANY UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTIUTIES MAY EXIST, AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR • ....... ...... 9Qti . ""‘ ........ ....... GRAPHIC SCALE rt0 ( IN PEST I inch 50 It RECEIVED JAN 1 0 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES c • hereby cert fy that th s survey was preparec by me or urder Oirect Superwean, Ood f No !Mc) 1 am 0 ch...y L-censed _one SAaveyc, 41 ler tre laws of tre State 07 Minnesota. I- I ;)"1 est. • TIONS DATE bqWn. ICHKD r‘PPVD REVISIONS COvMENITS I Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 767' Gentroi Avenue NE 0ey, MN 554.32 Equinox Development, LLP Una Lakes, MN 550' 425 Arrowhead Wye. ic (512) 408-2026 pRo...ccr TITLE Apollo Landing inos....mr 717. Trees that may be Saved Rh ... .._ .„, .„-„,: APR°42°5 CITYOF LN0LAKES! Land Use: industrial Land Use: Industrial Zoning: R Rorai 589'06'04E 660.01 Land Use: industrial 256.50 251.01 152 50 r 30' Rear 'Nara Setback 19 Spuces r -.J.. 11,000 SF zoo 69 Spaces 54,292 eq. rt._ 1.25 ad 96,00 S891- T 3 20.000 sq. ft. .0.46 OM.. 3,480 SF -4- ruLaim,z50 -1. --r „to InflitratioN Easement \ \ Note: IAILlading Pods Corrsestk 1 _La_ 0' Outside Building. >, L. IP 4 82,752 sq. ft. 1.90 acres N89'00'03-14 322.21 Zoning. R Land Use: Industrial N 19,600 SF 0 CO I (^ 70 InflItratIrin 0 Easemelti. o O 20 1° 8-1- in 0 Lilac Drive N. 0 0 z Spaces 90 6,750 SF Exiting Eau . _ . tine v \\ flltrast Semen 7\ 9=848,51 \ 5 L=„1,96.08 p12'56.09'', Nes-fasemertfitEi 7 1 =868 5 7',30 7 92,856 eq. ft. 2.13 acres V7150 SF-' 1 : 4 ' 63,000 sf. ft. Upland Proposed ,..' s- 4 •4 1.45 Acres , ' ,,,od 2 & 4. tk e / QS, sr,i4 4 868.51 /: 4..106.59 / 4.7101'547 Na9'00'03 123.04 N89'00'03W 180.00 Zomng: GB --- General Business Land Unto: Commercial NOTE: ANY UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND . •nes., •Irs .c.r rte se:miners QV 0 R=868.51 L=233.39 ke.) 6=1523'48" • c•N'c\ 7\v/ Fr9 Zoning. R - Rona; Land Use: Med. Density Residential ILand Use: Commercial Zcglin.g: GB --- Genera: Business Land Use: Commercial Zoning. 08 - - Genera, 8.,s3ness Land Use: Commercial GRAPHIC SCALE 1 0, FEE!' mnh tt0 Total Site Area - 348.85,5 SF 8.01 Acres Total Site Upland w 7.33 Acres (Proposed) - - - - Budding Pad - - Easement Property bescriptioe: Parcel A That part oi the West 600.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, fownsitip 31, Range 22. Anoka County, Minnesota lying South oldie North 504100 tiset and North oldie South 500.00 feet thereof, according to the US Government Survey, Anoka Cowny, Minnesota. ANIL That part of the West 500.00 toot oldie South 500.00 Stet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, 'Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying wady dale following described line Conenencing at the Southwest COMM' of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Easterly along the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 320.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be deacribed: thencallortheily at a right angle, a distance of 500.00 feet and Were imitating. Atbfee110 fiesecufists af malts ifany, ooti toad A& of way. Parnell) Thin port of the has 16t100 teet oldie West 660.00 teet 011ie South 500.00 tact of the Southeast Quarter of this Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, accordiglnihe US CJOVCM0)601 Survey thereat Anoka County, Miter-ante, lying North of a line being 50.001ent Notitifof the centerline of public street described MI follows: Commencing at the South Quarter Comer of Said Section 8, Township 31, Range 22 1110.:c on an 1151AMINA bearing of West along the South Itoe dealt &mhos,* Quetta. of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 836.79 feet to the peke of beginning of thectainiin 10 be dissented; thence Northeasterly 1124 51 feet along the arc of a non-tongential curve, ,concave io;:the Southeast, having • central angle of 78 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds, and a radius of 811.51 finitt, the long chord of which bears North 67 degrees 05 mantles 31 seconds East 1038.14 feet; thence South 73 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 221.72 feet, more or less, to the centerline of-Lake Drjve and there terminating; subject to easements of record, Zany. I hereby certify thut this survey wcS prepared ADDITIONS / REVISIONS by me or under my atrect supervison, and I. NO1 04TE RkostICHKD ' PPV01 COMMEIJ I S I ab, Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor 1 I 2/26/06 infiltratIon Easements • r ,. 1 • Equinox Development, LLP (1_6172)La4k0e8t2M8N2655014 Au ItiORIT 426 Arrowhead Drive, ipt y PROJECT T. T Ls Apollo Landing 900 CSI 4 IC 909.E 1106 ' 069 1C 9 0,53 004.41 K 4.. o.a3x -•O '-y10.5:v .-._91000 2 . FF 912.0 911,:. . 911.24 1 FF ' 9 9. 9.00 10 419 52 70 90 ' y.- 10 03 '(. 911 10 M ;'911_ � 10. 1 9. - 9, ?g --.-91013 ,7 0 940.05 / In 904 98 /j ito G [[? 2'') o e 0 zt 90+4r- Fasten Treated 2x12s on Pond Side of Existing Structure es shown above. Pond Outlet Reconfiguration o' -. 8.8 4,,. net Top View rip +"'4' -Y 005 00 Y 94, 905.00 / / Sturm ElaC•LOn 90498 r.M 9924, 12' Duvet Po. (E.,40mg, nY. 902 44 4.02 Looted Side View Skimmer w/ Orifice Detail (no scale) Rlprop 0YCet 041.•0 _ 911.04 91 .54 911, 91 . 91 . rTIOTO .h4 1.1. 91 r 0 cut ____ 10.00 909 50 - -v08 FF 908.'•0 902 8) 911.50 7;ffA }> } }IC SCALP. w u w •:. MfffEN14.[ 9444 NV SACIONC t 19 Fi:r'1' 1 inch >• SC' rt. o 000axc:, Shtfenoe Note: Siltfence will ba Installed around oil CDs until permanent erosion control Installation la Immanent. 912.x0 908 --------- ----• - _ ___.904._..- ._....._..._........ ---002---'-- - -- -- -90O-. --- 02.22' krCH4 A ^•olio .#a .rz j �. or.nrat aoe.t".'1, x w,7 4e xai4e ,�. -%- 6aL5> l- w Dkeotbn tt9 T5Q522 -,- ;; -- 908 t l ,ones M- >w ;O a e" « _ ______ �4 ----eirrits-intor 62 Lill ac-•Drive ______ f___ ' 006 canal Pond 902.41 100 -Year 908.14 Ice 897.7 (1/20/05' ,detail) NOTE: ANY UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE IN DEPTH AND LOCATION AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. OTHER UTIUT1ES t RCP -hl'j'I,ron Inv 80j.1! \oJ Bean- Cu \rf -RE 000.ae (10 = 906 --- - Rock Entrance NOR -01.1 4 44 Sou4 Uad0I111 10 MOOT !std. TYPE a .-FD,CIC 0402. at R OLM ALONG CUYrr4l$ M AS Otr6Cn11 BY O1afLiR SILT FENCE. I/■4/o4 YIANOAC ORM .n 4c+, 601 It VEt: F: "iATtUN /LANDSCAPINGMi(ASU1tES Sd n:rex well be installed mount ttrc perin'-i91 dam 1,4o aN 6110‘1,10.11 d.' (2100 to prevent A.41 ir.'to x4:44, ,lV ,.x .ac Y i., erosion. Within 5 day, of completion ofgOUdityt of individual areas of the site. tasmrbed areas will ee se ,(lc,$ atll 0018,07 sold d. Building pads that have been graded will be seeded rid tnuklx El. INFII.I1(A'ITON BASINS Nu mining of sum material wiltbe idioms! in these 1lasin areas. final gmada,g o1111904111115111,i well b 1017 ammo surrounding areas have been stabilized with sidewalk. and bituminous pavement. and will be accomplished with track dozer to minimize compaction. • A 50-511 nix of ou -site sand ardtopsud will be spore/kw a minimum depth of b meltcs. lheac !uvas well be axEn vi watt Mnlw l' seed mix 260 and MnDoi 31193 Typo 1 desk - anchored mulch. POND CON91'I4UCI1ON Pond Cunslruuion wet irx:eade excavation of a temporary sump to allow dcwatcring the mind bottom with puns .0 l water to be discharged alto the north ditch of Lilac (hive. 7 he entire pond will be regraded 10 allow construction afa 104001 wale (10:1 slope) bench around tlx: entire pond between, elevations 901.9. 902.9, anti reseeding of the entire pint. fhe maxi excavation will be uvcrsi[x,, by ' liar to the areas below elevation 9(X1 and by 4 levy between the elevations 898 drat 904. Me bottom and sides will be tasit with n 2 -foot thick bentonite -::and mhrlw'e (mixture and placement as rem n me ded by hematite supplier to effectively prevent seepage) up to he elevation of 902.4.. Gwtextile filter t&Mc snider 2 tier binikler tiptop well be placed .uz,0d 4112 pond between the elevations 899 and -904. Above the riprap, the pond will be seeded with Wild Flower Mix ,mdcr erosion control fabric, mix to be approved by the Engineer. tMPLL+MEN'FATION SCHEDULE Rei ove trees. install siltienc4 -- April 11 -15 Strip unl stockpile topsoil, remove existhng; buikfaigs at debris -• April 18./2 Excavate pond & lone wi 88.ntonite. riprap, fill with City water, guide site April 25 -May b Begin Hotel C'onsnuction install water, sewer, morn -- May 9 -27 Grade boulevards and subgnwle, install curb & gutter -- May 31 -!Fate In !intuit Clair 5 base, replace topsoil. and & mulch -- June 13 -17 Pave Main Access Road •- Jute 20 -24 PLOODPLAIN 'there i, no &Nxiptaln at this she. it o e eumed that buddin t,s will ai! be sia5 -on- grade. Feet ElE,urtikv;ta,ru (t VC) 44 specified for each bedding: .Of any building is propose¢ to have a tloon elevation.lower:Man 1)1, a separate groundwater evaluation will be required-to deternnn a the lowest allowable door elevation.. . kOC4 CONS/RUCTION ENTRANCE', Qreiwnd'ew.i761 bag 01:704 wu • eu,ar4 E,,.e..h. wax. rsoA,.ra ream' w ut wow ,r .uw., . 4A1.4. 077671 r4R 0100 SFWE4 !NU.: ':.,42 :...101 TIEDik �a 4 1 APR 0 4 2005 2.I L/ EL N'..,i 4 hereby certify !hot tms pion, spe::!tication,- I _ 4!)DIT10VS % RE v1SIUNS or report eras preporsd o> me or under my Nn I DATE DR9r1'.y nKD. PPEJD Ci 1!dn4E +ENT_ • threat supervision, and mat I urn, a duty r -?'- -- i .��-- ---•- Licensed Professeonol Engineer under the -}--'- "- - "-I State of ldennesotd Statutes, Sections 326.02 C -I--- -- -1 -'--1' I Equinox Development, LLP wiUt0ke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. r= " =i =``- 42s.Airgwhaod Orivs .� __ Apollo Landing RU )E__1 T. _E Lino Lokkta. tObl 55014 (612) 4118 -2826 • • • • AGENDA ITEM V.B. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: April 13, 2005 TOPIC: Conditional Use Permit Amendment Rehbein Transit BACKGROUND Rehbein Transportation is proposing an 8 foot x 100 foot awning addition to the north side of the existing facilities at 6298 Hodgson Road. The Rehbein property is covered by a conditional use permit for the existing bus transit center. Building additions such as those proposed in this application require an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. Construction of the addition was begun prior to the issuance of the appropriate building permits or this application and was stopped by the City of Lino Lakes Building Department. No further construction has taken place after the first warning was issued by a building inspector. Under the new zoning ordinance, the site plan review is done administratively. However, a Conditional Use Permit amendment is necessary, and a site plan review is part of the CUP review. Therefore the comments for the Site Plan Review will be included in this report. Because this application involves the CUP amendment, it is also appropriate to review the conditions placed on the site through the last CUP amendment in 1999. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Bus Transit Facility Commercial GB (General Business) North Single Family Dwellings Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) South Single Family Dwellings g y g Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) East Single Family Dwellings Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) West Manufactured Homes Low Density Unsewered Residential & Manufactured Home Park R -1 (Single Family Residential) & R -6 (Manufactured Home Park) • Rehbein Amendment Page 2 of 3 SITE PLAN Buildings: Site plans have been submitted for the addition which will be attached to the north side of the western most building (Office and Shop building). This addition will be 53.4 feet from the north property line and therefore meets setback requirements. Lighting: The applicant did not submit a lighting plan with the application; staff is recommending a condition of approval that an appropriate lighting plan be submitted for staff review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. Traffic: As this area will not be enclosed it is not believed that this addition would create any additional traffic to or from the site. Grading/Drainage, Utilities: As this addition is very minor in nature, no grading plans were required with the Conditional Use Permit Amendment application. The City Engineer will require that the necessary plans be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. Landscaping: No landscaping plan was submitted with the application. • PREVIOUS ACTION The City Council approved an Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for the site July 26, 1999. The conditions for that approval are as follows: • 1. Proper building permits including the entire building to be sprinkled be obtained prior to any construction and 1% escrow deposit be provided to insure completion of site improvements. 2. The proposed construction blend with the existing building exterior. 3. A lighting plan be provided for staff review and comment — all lighting shall be shielded and directed downward. 4. The trash handling area shall be screened from the street right -of -way and adjoining properties. 5. Drainage and utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. During the review of the current request the Fire Department has been very vocal in the fact that the previous addition, which was supposed to include a fire sprinkler system, was never completed. The fire sprinkler system was installed but never connected to the water source. As such, staff is recommending a condition of approval requiring that the fire sprinkler system be connected with this addition. To further insure that this is completed staff is recommending that a performance agreement with appropriate financial sureties be entered into between the developer and the city prior to the issuance of any building permits for this site. • Rehbein Amendment Page 3 of 3 OPTIONS. a. Approve the Conditional Use Permit Amendment subject to conditions. b. Deny the Conditional Use Permit Amendment subject to conditions. c. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction must comply with the requirements of the Centennial Fire Department, including the connection of the existing buildings to municipal water for fire sprinkling. 2. A performance agreement between the city and the developer must be executed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the subject site. 3. A lighting plan in conformance with the zoning code must be submitted for review and approval by staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The proposed addition is subject to double permit fees as construction was begun prior to • the issuance of any building permits. • This review is based on the following plans and information: 1. Rehbein Plan Set received March 14, 2005 PROPERTY LINE 3NI7 A/d3dOdd 0 to [TJ < 1° ( -.1! o o . I U I IL .V£S 1 L•9Z 0 1 NI I L__K —1 BUS PARKING PROPERTY LINE 30N3d )4N11-NIVHO EMPLOYEE PARKING > 'trn 2OC) OCO0Z a c REVD MAR 1 4 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES Z O H X to ZZOI In 0 coj m J � CS/O W NZLO w toJtD 550-t\ •C CORRELATED STEEL ROOF • 15' 10' 8' REHBEIN TRANSIT INC 6298 HODGSON RD LINO LAKES, MN 55014 651-484-1809 ••• • , • - • • ',A 13/4" X 16' UR 6 X 6 PRESS-UR TREATED POS" 6 X 6 POST BR/ 12" X 4' PIER RECEIVED MAR 1 4 2005 CnThr L.ME,', • • NEW AWNING TO REPLACE OLD ONE EXISTING BUILDING 0 0 8' REHBEIN TRANSIT INC. 6298 HODGSON RD. LINO LAKES, MN. 55014 0 0 0 oI 0 0 0 n 9- 12" PIERS, 10' ON CENTER REC ET'E 0 MAR 1 4 2005 CITY OF LINO O LAKES AGENDA ITEM V.C. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: April 13, 2005 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING Conditional Use Permit to allow a PUD (Planned Unit Development) Development Stage Plan / Preliminary Plat Final Plat Fairview Clinic City of Lino Lakes (Preliminary and Final Plat) BACKGROUND Fairview Health Services is proposing a 10,455 square foot addition to their existing 9,610 square foot clinic building located at 7455 Village Drive. The application submitted includes a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Planned Unit Development, a Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and final plat. The Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development is being requested to allow the clinic to locate a portion of the addition closer to the right -of -way than would be allowed in the Limited Business zoning district. *This will be more in keeping with the spirit and intent of the development standards for the Legacy at Wood's Edge project that will be constructed on the other side of the street from the subject property. The City of Lino Lakes has worked out an agreement to sell a portion of the property to the north to the applicant to allow this expansion. The rest of that city owned parcel (Outlot A) will then be used as right -of- way for the realignment of the on -ramp of northbound Interstate 35W. Therefore the city is acting as a co- applicant on the preliminary and final plat portions of the project. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Clinic Mixed Use Limited Business North Interstate 35W NA (Right of Way) NA (Right of Way) South Bank Mixed Use Limited Business East Vacant Mixed Use Planned Unit Development West Gas Station Commercial General Business Fairview Clinic, page 2 Prelimina and Final Plat he plat drawings include the existing 1.72 acre Fairview Clinic property (Lot 1, Block 1 of The Village No. 1), and the 1.1 acre City of Lino Lake's property (two parcels). The result of the plat will be the expansion of the Fairview Clinic property to 2.19 acres, and the remaining 0.64 acres will be retained by the City until it is needed for the on -ramp project. As part of the Legacy at Wood's Edge project the City will be reconstructing Lake Drive to accommodate the required street width. This reconstruction also includes a trail along the east side of Lake Drive. The city is requesting that Fairview dedicate a 10 foot wide trail easement parallel to Lake Drive. The appropriate drainage and utility easements are depicted on the plat and title commitments have been forwarded to the city attorney for review. Planned Unit Development The proposed addition to the existing clinic is only required to obtain the conditional use permit for a Planned Unit Development in order to allow the expansion to be moved closer to the right of way in keeping with the spirit and intent of the development standards for the Wood's Edge project. Within the Limited Business zoning district the setback for this type of addition would be 30 feet. The applicant is proposing a 9 foot setback from Village Drive. Across the street the Wood's Edge project is requiring no more than 5 feet from the right of way. •3uilding Materials/ Elevations The submitted elevations depict brick walls with cast stone capping in keeping with the existing construction. The matching of old and new construction has been hidden with facade articulations whenever possible, and entry treatments have been used on the north side to emulate those used for the main entry on the south side. The main concern of staff at this point is the matching of brick color to the existing building and the transition from existing brick to new brick. For the most part the proposed design hides the transition points from existing to new brick, with the exception of the Lake Drive elevation. This transition point will be clearly the most visible and is therefore is the most cause for concern. Staff is recommending a condition requiring that the applicant match brick color as much as possible, and if the color difference is significant enough that some architectural feature or embellishment be done on the Lake Drive elevation to hide the transition point in some fashion. Building Height The applicant is proposing to limit the height of the addition to 14 feet, which is well below the 36 -foot maximum allowed in the Limited Business zoning district. Landscaping and Green Space As the site is bound by right of way and commercially /mixed use property the landscaping requirements are .minimal. The applicant has worked with Marty Asleson, the city's Environmental Coordinator, to make some Fairview Clinic, page 3 changes to the proposed landscape plan. Staff is recommending a condition of approval requiring the applicant Illko follow the recommendations of the Environmental Board including irrigation of seeded areas and alternative landscape materials. Staff is also recommending that the landscape plan include the addition of two woodbine plants at the base of the three trellises shown on the architectural elevations. The submitted plans depict impervious surface coverage at xx %, well below the 65% allowed in the Limited Business zoning district. Parking The City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, within Section 3,Subdivision 5.F.12, includes the following requirement for medical clinic parking: Parking Factor Requirement Number Required 20,065 square feet Three spaces plus at least one space for each two hundred square feet of floor area. 104 The submitted plans depict 108 parking spaces, leaving a surplus of 4 additional parking spaces. Staff is recommending a couple of changes to the site plan that may result in the elimination of those 4 additional parking spaces, however at no time will parking be reduced below that of the minimum. As noted in the comments from S.E.H. the geometrics of the parking lot drive aisle at the northwest corner of •he proposed building are problematic. As recommended in the memorandum two parking spaces should be eliminated to allow realignment and improved sight lines. Additionally, the drive aisles within the new construction portion of the site must be increased to the standard 24 foot width. This also will result in the potential need for parking elimination. A revised plan depicting conformance with these comments, as well as still providing the minimum 104 parking spaces will need to be submitted for staff review prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. Considering the use of the site and the potential development of senior housing on the adjacent parcel, additional handicapped parking should be dedicated on the south side near the entry of the clinic. Access /Circulation Access to the site is proposed via a shared driveway from Village Drive (shared with the bank to the south) and another dedicated entry /exit driveway directly from Village Drive. The second access will mostly be used for employee parking and to allow two points of access to the clinic and bank in case either is blocked. Pedestrian circulation is provided via sidewalks along the entire Village Drive right of way, and a system of sidewalks around the exterior of the building. All new sidewalks shall be increased to 6 feet in width when abutted by parking to provide proper accessible routing. As mentioned above, a trail will be added to the Lake Drive right of way on the east side of the street. Staff would encourage the applicant to provide at least one sidewalk access to that trail when the final design is implemented. IP Fairview Clinic, page 4 Lighting 410 The applicant has not completed a photometric lighting plan at this time. Staff is comfortable continuing with this application with the recommended condition requiring that a photometric lighting plan in conformance with city standards be submitted for staff review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Fixtures on site will be in conformance with the fixtures used on the existing portion of the site, and with city standards requiring them to be recessed, shoebox -style fixtures. Signage The applicant is not proposing additional signs; however a spot on the northwest corner of the site is being planned for a monument sign for the entire Wood's Edge development. This sign is not a part of this application and will be reviewed when an application is received by the Community Development Department. Trash / Mechanical Equipment The existing trash enclosure will remain, and another is not needed at this time. All mechanical equipment will be screened architecturally or with landscaping materials. Utilities The existing facility is already connected to municipal services, and this expansion was planned when those connections were made. 411 Stormwater management S.E.H., the engineer for the Wood's Edge project has reviewed the submitted grading and drainage plan, as the development of this site must be integrated into the overall grading and drainage plan for the area. The comments from S.E.H. are attached to this report. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the March 30, 2005 regular meeting. There recommendations included a revised tree preservation plan, irrigation of seeded areas, lighting fixtures, monument lighting, landscaping materials, stormwater pollution, and the excess of parking. As all of the significant trees are on the city owned parcel, and were not planned to be saved as a part of the Wood's Edge master plan. Staff wholly agrees with the need to irrigate seeded areas, and has included a condition of approval requiring it. Staff also understands the sensitivity in regards to lighting, and has recommended a condition requiring staff review of a photometric lighting plan and fixtures prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. The clinic is not proposing any additional signage, the monument sign shown on the plans is for the Wood's Edge master planned development and has not been designed at this time. The landscaping suggestions of the Environmental Board are included as a condition of approval below. Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required of all developments prior to construction, so this will be taken care of during the post - approval process with the building permit /development agreement. The excess of parking is discussed in the parking section of the report and is addressed through conditions of approval. *OPTIONS 1. Approval subject to conditions of approval. 2. Denial of the application. 3. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the requirements of the S.E.H. memorandum. • Fairview Clinic, page 5 2. The landscape plan shall be revised to depict irrigation in all seeded areas; red maples in place of the sugar maples proposed along Lake Drive; and two woodbine plants at the base of all three trellises shown on the architectural elevation. 3. Additional handicapped parking must be provided along the southwest side of the building just west of the main entry of the clinic. 4. All sidewalks directly abutting parking stalls shall be increased to a minimum of six feet in width. 5. At least one connection between the clinics internal sidewalk system and the city trail planned for the Lake Drive frontage should be included. 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the site the applicant must submit a photometric lighting plan for staff review and approval. 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the site the applicant must submit a revised site plan depicting 24 foot wide drive aisles in the new construction portion of the parking lot and a realignment of the drive aisle at the northwest corner of the building to staff's satisfaction. The number of parking spaces provided shall at no time drop below the requirements of the Zoning Code. 8. A development agreement between the city and the developer must be executed prior to the execution of the final plat by the city. 9. The brick used for new construction must match that of the existing building, if staff feels the difference is significant enough the Lake Drive elevation must have an architectural feature or embellishment to hide the transition from new brick to old brick as much as possible. 10. The applicant shall dedicate a 10 foot wide trail easement parallel to Lake Drive. 11. The proposed addition is subject to MnDOT and Anoka County Highway Department requirements, review, and approval. 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the site the applicant must submit a full revised set of drawings depicting conformance with all of the above requirements. .ATTACHMENTS • • 1. S.E.H. memorandum dated April 8, 2005 2. Environmental Board memorandum from March 30, 2005 meeting. 3. Fairview Expansion Plan Set received March 14, 2005. 4. Preliminary and Final Plat received March 31, 2005. Fairview Clinic, page 6 April 8, 2005 Paul Bengtson Associate Planner City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Bengtson: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Fairview Lino Lakes Clinic Engineering Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.04 SPCV Identified below are our review comments for the proposed expansion of the Fairview Lino Lakes Clinic, prepared by Harris Architects. Plans for the proposed expansion were submitted to our office for review on April 4, 2005. Proposed Grading Plan 1. Note 14 states that all disturbed areas are to be seeded. The City will allow turf restoration by seeding, provided an irrigation system is installed. If an irrigation system is not planned, all disturbed areas must be restored with sod. 2. A temporary rock construction entrance must be shown at the proposed entrance on Village Drive. 3. Roof drain locations must be shown and called out on the grading plan. 4. Catch basins must be utilized to capture storm water runoff from the new parking lot rather than allowing the runoff to flow directly on to Village Drive. Correspondingly, details showing catch basins and catch basin manholes must be provided on the plans. 5. Proposed spot elevations at the building expansion corners must be shown. Proposed Landscape & New Site Plan 1. A 5 -foot wide sidewalk is shown on the north side of the proposed expansion, abutting the parking lot. Widening the sidewalk to 6 feet, thereby providing adequate pedestrian passage when parked vehicles overhang the sidewalk, should be considered. 2. A pedestrian curb ramp must be located in front of both proposed building entrances. 3. Proposed geometrics of the parking lot drive aisle at the northwest corner of the building are problematic. Northbound vehicles turning westerly may result in them driving into the opposing lane of traffic. Westbound vehicles will likely have the same tendency. To improve sight lines and geometrics, we recommend elimination of two parking stalls in this area: (1) the most northerly stall on the parking bay nearest to Lake Drive; and (2) the most westerly stall on the north side of the proposed building. Even with elimination of the two stalls, the applicant must demonstrate there is adequate space available to accommodate opposing vehicles. 4. Parking lot drive aisles must be at least 24 feet in width. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110 -5196 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 651.490.2000 1 800.325.2055 1 651.490.2150 fax • Paul Bengtson April 8, 2005 Page 2 Proposed Site Details 1. Details must be provided for a pedestrian curb ramp. 2. Details must be provided for a driveway apron. 3. Details must be provided for storm sewer structures. Proposed Hydrocad Model 1. The total area of all subcatchments for pre- and post - development conditions should be equivalent. 2. Post - development discharge is slightly higher than pre - development conditions. This is acceptable, as the proposed Village Drive improvements will include storm sewer capable of handling this increased discharge. General Comments 1. Village Drive will be rebuilt as a part of the Legacy at Woods Edge Project, and as such, the proposed entrance to the Fairview Clinic expansion does not currently reflect the proposed changes to Village Drive. A discussion should be held between all involved parties regarding the coordination and timing of the Fairview Clinic expansion with the Legacy at Woods Edge Project. As a part of the reconstruction of Village Drive, a storm sewer stub will be provided at the proposed drive entrance for the clinic, which can be used to address comment 4 in the Grading Plan section. 2. It is recommended that the construction specifications for the Fairview Clinic expansion reflect the need for the contractor to coordinate work with the City's contractor on the Legacy at Woods Edge project. Please call me at 651.490.2147 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Robert L. Moberg, PE Project Manager sh c: Michael Grochala, City of Lino Lakes Troy Livgard, James R. Hill, Inc. John Harriss, Harriss Architects x.\ o\linol \030503 \fairview clinic\plan review 040805.doc • 1 Environmental Memo To: Paul Bengston From: Marty Asleson CC: Jeff Smyser /Mike Grochala Date: April 5, 2005 Re: Environmental Board recommendations /March 30, 2005 Fairview Lino Lakes Clinic /Expansion The Environmental Board met on April 30, 2005 and made the following recommendations concerning the Fairview Clinic Expansion: 1. The tree preservation plan should indicate size and species of significant trees on the plan. 2. Areas indicated as seeded should also be indicated as irrigated (assuming the Seeded areas are cultural grass (Turf) seed. 3. All lighting should be flush mounted, recessed, "Shoebox- type" fixtures. 4. All monument lighting should be checked for conformance to the City Guidelines. 5. Sugar maples on the West side of the building should be changed to something more drought tolerant and adapted to sandy soils. Hackberry, red maple, Locust, Ashares all appropriate substitutes. 6. A Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan must be submitted to the City and reviewed by the City prior to construction. The plan must be available on site (a described location) together with required inspection reports. The Environmental Division of the City of Lino lakes should be supplied with a copy of the Storm water pollution Prevention Plan. All initial SWPPP elements must be installed before ground disturbance occurs. • Page 1 • a • 7. Reduce the parking to 104, from 108 to meet the minimum required parking stall number. If more parking spaces are necessary, than add pervious parking stalls. • Page 2 211.2 r r-- _ ...�....... ^.... . •.-. 'x911.3 .� .V k91l,1‘? MONUMENT x 911.2 909.8 609.5. - . x 926 6,_ ' Y NORM UNE OF _, ...;..,(482. ....: { ... .- .- 054- '-- .- ..- .... -. x910.6 pUT1.0T C , �..�..., _- -,,...,ayt: t 06.90 .-- �'99i2.1 720 LOP sr - _1:1_:22_34, .^i OP } / / 910.7 91313 J { 1 f y/ 913.0 912.8 " "'~ 912.9, e26.39" R 4 p0 x 911.3 \ I 277.76 i■•4 69,37 !913,0 910. 912.5/ !0 / r k 913.0 912 x 912,9 913-' 912.9/ / It' '0 / is 1 t 1 Y t f f512 I 911 3.6 • rs' W 9 . a \_�eE�b� t =913.1 r `, a, 912.5 x 912.7 a P s / x 907.0 1 907 \ e )), \ / r y //1/ / 806.9 / / / / / ./ o• / , 0 / 0 • 0 0 o oo • 0 0 t7 F.E.S. D.I.P. P.V.C. P.C.P. 0 LEGEND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 1, Anoka County, Minnesota Together with: That part of Outlot C, THE VILLAGE NO. I, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the most southerly comer of said Oudot C; thence North 64 degrees 53 minutes 10 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the southwesterly lino of said Outlot C, 240.00 feet to the most westerly comer of said Outlot C and the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northeasterly 277.76 feet along a non - tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 384.00 fat, a central angle of 41 degrees 26 minutes 39 seconds and a chord which bears North 74 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds East to the north line of said Outlot C; thence North 82 degrees 06 minutes 50 seconds East, along said north line, 41.90 feet to the most easterly corner of said Outlot C and said line them terminating. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. This Survey was performed by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. IRON SET IRON FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND PK NAIL SET POWER POLE LIGHT POLE GAS METER ELECTRIC BOX GUY WIRE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT AUTO SPRINKLER GATE VALVE FLARED END SECTION DUCTILE IRON PIPE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE HANDICAP PARKING STALL DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ASPHALT SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE EXISTING CONTOURS OVERHEAD POWER LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE CHAIN LINK FENCE SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATER MAIN TREE LINE Signed this 9th day of March, 2005. For. James R. Hill, Inc. By Harold C. Peterson, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 12294 SCALE IN FEET 30 60 1 inch = 30 feet NOTES I- 2005 ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 1 TO HAVE AN ASSUMED BEARING OF S 25'21'07" W. THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT OR TITLE OPINION. A TITLE SEARCH FOR RECORDED OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS WHICH MAY BENEFIT OR ENCUMBER THIS PROPERTY HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED BY THE SURVEYOR. THE LOCATION AND INFORMATION SHOWN REGARDING UTILITIES, SERVING THIS PROPERTY OR EXISTING ON THIS PROPERTY AS SHOWN AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY, HAVE BEEN LOCATED BY ON -SITE OBSERVATION OR TAKEN FROM PLANS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING THESE UTILITIES PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF LINO LAKES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND /OR GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1 FOOT. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF LINO LAKES DATUM. (NGVD 29) BENCHMARK TOP NUT HYDRANT CORNER OF LAKE DRIVE AND TOWN CENTER PARKWAY. ELEVATION = 909.25 FEET NUMBER OF REGULAR PARKING STALLS = NUMBER OF HANDICAP PARKING STALLS = TOTAL = 70 4 74 OVERALL. GROSS AREA = 95,425 SQUARE FEET OR 2.191 ACRES COpp V >- DRAWN BY _ KTB /SPH DATE 3/7/05 REVISIONS CAD FILE 21804S PROJECT NO. 21804 FILE NO. 2 -05 -016 SHEET 1 OF 1 / / / / / / / / / / / / / O . • 4 f J * I / ,`t>; / I I ( / 4D • 1 ti. / r 4 } I ) / f * 'iC `I �i , A�.� I I l /* • ,. 1 1 (412- 1 C1 / / / // / / / ) /I / )/O / (' / 3 / / / +80000 +800.00 1000 LEGEND BGIEL PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6" DEEP TRENCH AND BACKFILL IMMEDIATELY. FILE COPY PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS TREE LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER HAY BALE CHECK DAM PROPOSED SILT FENCE EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE POSTS or ON CENTER POSTS SHALL BE 2"X2" HARDWOOD. PINE OR STANDARD STEEL FENCE POSTS. POSTS SHALL BE DRIVEN 24" INTO THE GROUND. _• irra GENERAL O 80180 NOTES: 1. SPECIFICATIONS WHICH APPLY ARE THE MOST RECENT EDITIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITY IN VAACH THE WORK I5 LOCATED AND THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICAT0N5 FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION UNLESS MODIFIED HEREIN ON THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 2. IT 15 THE RESPONSBIUTY OF 114E CONTRACTOR TO UTUZE THE "GOPHER STATE ORE CALL" EXCAVATION NOTICE SYSTEM AS REQUIRED UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTE CHAPTER 2160, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION (PHONE 651 -454 -0002 IN THE TWIN CITIES METRO AREA CR TOLL FREE 1- B00- 252 - 1166). 3. GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL CONSTRUCTION AS CALLED FOR ON THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE 'WITH ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS 5. ALL LOT AND EASEMENT DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO FINAL PLAT. 6. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES CALLED FOR ON THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, WI41CH MAY INCLUDE SILT FENCE. SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS. SHALL 8E CONSTRUCTED AND SERVICEABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER, AS REQUIRED, AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH PART 10 OF THE MPG* GENERAL STORM WATER PERMIT (SEE "NPDES REQUIREMENTS"). a ROCK CONSTRUCTOR ENTRANCES. 9.. SILT FENCE. TEMPORARY CULVERTS. d. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND OU1FALL FAOUTES. e. STORM WATER POND CONSTRUCTION. T. COMMON EXCAVATION ANO EMBANKMENT (GRADING CONSTRUCTION). 9. SEED AND MULCH (SEE NOTE 14). h. STRAW BALE BARRIERS IN FINISHED GRADED MEAS. 1. INLET AND OUTLET FACILITIES SUBSEQUENT TO STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION. 7. GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON TIHESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IMPLEMENT ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY. 6. ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE GRADING CONTRACTOR DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. ANY TEMPORARY FACIUTIES WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED AS CALLED FCR ON THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED BY 116E GRADING CONTRACTOR WHEN DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN RESTORE THE SUBSEQUENTLY DISTURBED AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 9. IT I5 THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE GRADING CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OFF -STE ALL TREES, STUMPS, BRUSH, OR OTHER DEBRIS 114AT EMSTS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREAS; DISPOSAL SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH .MPCA REQUIREMENTS TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. 10. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE THE S0.5 ENGINEER SO THAT CERTIFICATION OF ALL CONTROLLED' FILLS CAN BE FURNISHED TO THE OWNER DURING AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. 11. DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN TO EVALUATE THE COMPACTION WITHIN THE STREETS TRAVEL WAYS OR PARKING LOTS WITHIN THE UPPER 3 FEET OF STREET SUB GRADE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ALL SOILS BE NOT MORE THAN ONE PERCENTAGE POINT OVER THE SOIL'S STANDARD PROCTOR OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT, AND THAT COMPACTOR TO A MINIMUM OF 10061 OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BE PROVIDED. IN AREAS BELOW THE UPPER THREE FEET OF SUBGRADE OF TIE STREETS, TRAVEL WATS OR PARKING LOTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ALL SOILS BE NOT MORE THAN THREE PERCENTAGE POINTS OVER TIE SOILS STANDARD PROCTOR OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. AND THAT COMPACTOR TO A MINIMUM OF 95X OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BE PROVIDED. THE GRADING TOLERANCE FOR THESE AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1'3. 12. LOT GRADING AND /OR THE PREPARATION OF BUILDING PADS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 'WITH THESE PLANS AND SPEOFICATONS THE GRADING TOLERANCE SHALL BE 0.25'3. ALL EARTHWORK OPERATIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 144E HUD -FHA DATA SHEET 79G "LAND DEVELOPMENT WITH CONTROLLED EARTHWORK ", PROVIDING FOR A MINIMUM OF 95% STANDARD DENSITY, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE GEO- TECHNICAL ENGINEER. 13. BUILDING PADS SHOWN ON EACH LOT ARE TYPICAL ONLY. THE DEPTH OF THE PAO FROM FRONT TO BACK SHALL BE GRADED THROUGHOUT THE FULL WIDTH OF THE LOT OR AS NECESSARY TO ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A BUILDING AT THE MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACKS (REFER TO THE PLANS FOR SPECIFIC SETBACK DISTANCES.) IF UNSUITABLE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED WITHIN A PROPOSED BUILDING PAO THAT CANNOT BE CORRECTED OR REMOVED, IT 15 THE RESPSONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF THE CONDITIONS AND TO LOCATE THE UNITS OF THE UNSUITABLE AREAS. 14. UNLESS OTMERVA5E SPECIFICALLY NOTED, 114E 0001011ING SITE RE- VEGETATION TECHNIQUES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED. ALL DISTURBED AREAS, EXCEPT STREETS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6" TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED WITH Mn00T j250 (GENERAL SEED) MIX AT 70 LBS. /ACRE SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED 68114 MnOOT TYPE 1 AT 2 TONS/ACRE AND DISC ANCHORED. SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 2 WEEKS AFTER EARTH MOWING OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED. ALL SLOPES THAT EXCEED 3(14):1(8) SHALL BE SEEDED WITH A WOOD FIBER BLANKET. FERTUZER SHALL BE 22 -5-10 BOX W.I.N. 0% CI OR EQUIVALENT AND APPLIED AT 350 POUNDS PER ACRE FERTUZER 15 TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE TOP 3 TO 4 INCHES BY DI5UTNG OR SOME 01ER SUITABLE MEANS. WHEN SEEDING AFTER NOVEMBER 1, OR WHEN TEMPERATURES DO NOT EXCEED 40 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DORMANT SEED ALONG ALL DISTURBED AREAS DORMANT SEED BED PREPARATION, SEEDING RATES, AND MULCH REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE THE SAME AS THOSE DESCRIBED IN THIS 50CT0N EXCEPT THAT NO SEED SHALL BE PLACED ON SNOW OR ICE WHICH 15 GREATER THAN 2 INCHES IN DEPTH. ANY SEEDED AREAS WHICH DO NOT BECOME ESTABUSHEO SHALL BE RE- SEEDED AT 114E CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 15. IT I5 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO KEEP PUBLIC STREETS. TRAVEL WAYS. PARKING LOTS AND TRAILS FREE OF DIRT AND OTHER DEBRIS WHICH RESULTS FROM SAID GRADING CONSTRUCTION. SPFOFIC CRATING 80505; 1. THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND CONTOUR ELEVATIONS ON THE PLANS WERE PROVIDED BY JAMES R. HILL, INC. ON OR ABOUT 03/07/05. THE DEGREE OF ACCURACY OF THE EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN ON THE PLAN I5 EQUAL TO 3 ONE HALF TIE CONTOUR INTERVAL i1A R 1 2005 EROSION CONTRO F N TIVE19U.M0 rµ 0 SCALE IN FEET 30 60 1 inch = 30 feet 90 VI = n N Z N 3 � m� CC W m < W os A Cr) 2 n z ° Z W J n o Y W _, U z U DRAWN BY TDL DATE 03/10/05 REVISIONS CAD FILE 21804G PROJECT NO. 21804 SHEET 1 OF 1 EXISTING FAIRVIEW LINO LADS GCMG 7 r -� EXISTN6 BANK PAIR MA 7 U IEXISTM SAW J TOWN CENTER PARKWAY 1 J EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE r • 4174P SI1E.Ex L LSI; $1 Tag gm TREES MARRED W AN 'X' TO BE REMOVED i =yam_ -- —DEMO CURB /DEMO EXIST BITINNCID1 I to Er— J TRAidPC TO RIR _r1AN r 1 DEMO PARTIAL M. BRICK SCREEN WALL DEMO PARTIAL NT. BRICK SCREEN LIALL r PARTLAL M. BRICK WALL TO REMAIN 0, 0 I FILE COPY �qR 1 2GO- ar7 ` TOWN CENTER PARKWAY J SITE DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE r . Ad•lr SITEE•OQ10 1. ■ i ARCHITECTS 331 Second Ave. No. Suite 2110 Minneapolis MN 55401 1 HERESY GERM THAT THIS RAH. SPECNANN OR REPORT POS PREYED ST ME OR MITI W AND THAT R AN 11 DIRECT SUPER401 01.11.Y RECTUM -0 ARCHITECT METER THE LAPIS OF THE STATE 6 IMIONESCRA DATE. 0311./05 EOSIIMTION NO 22603 R r3 tiLl FAIRVIEW LINO LAKES CLINIC 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE LINOV��) LAKES, MN CITY SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION =STING SITE & DEMO SITE PLANS DATE : 3/14/05 REVISIONS NO. DATE INFORMATION L1 —® J06 mum 2440 a FAIRVIEW LHO LAKES PLANTING SCHEDULE I • arr. Cara* NAPE I OOTAPICAL NOE 1 SIZE SPAC.15 A 5 Sack Mb Syrup, 1 Mona Gana Obeid 545 V•IS. IL 25.5. OC. 5 3 Austrian Piro Phs alga r • 34 elos 20,0* Or.. C 3 Feratrie Eta CrabApPIA Ma 1nrairia Fir r - $ se 5er 4t• Oa D 3 Ewing Sloe Crabapple Mau oItg &P. 1 r - 2%12 5113 30-fr or 3 tr.Ipar Maple Aur Walrus r • 215. 548 25,9 OC F 23 Rd %La Ooepood I Caner Stolonifera 1 20 at 4%9 OC. 6 44 01515 Siseerocallb I I GAL Cart. 2e oc. TOWN CENTER PARKWAY L L LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE. r • 0115.11111 L TOWN CENTER PARKWAY FILE COPY MAR 2005 if 0 FAIRVIEW LINO LAKE0 EX16155 AREA, SAW 0. (0A61-ED) AD0ITI05 mos I4EALAEIA, 21/1241.4,L EXISTING FAIRvIEW SITE 14,661.1. It&152g2FASYELAKM PARCEL 5 OF OIELOT C 211433&!. PROPOSED COMBINED Egg 35351 AF. PAWING EXISTIPIG, 14 SPACES PEVA 34 SPACES =AL ..1120.EACES PAEK44G RECUIREMENT ps tea L NEW SITE PLAN tCALE. r • 41s-00 1*0E455 111 II 1 ■ ■ \ . ARCHITECTS 331 Second Ave. No. Suite 200 Minneapolis MN 55401 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT MS RAN. WECIFICATON OR REPORT FR YE OR WIDER WC VAS PREMED DIRECT SWEAR:JON MC THAT I AM A MET REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNOER THE STAN Ci IWIMSOTA LAWS OF THE CIATE. 03/14/05 gummy, Ho- 22603 0 La 0 r=T1 FAIRVIEW LINO LAKES CLINIC 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE c...•••.k...........e) LINO LAKES, MN CITY SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE & NEW SUE PLAN DATE : 3/14/05 REVISIONS NO. DATE INFORMATION L1-1 Joe NUMBER 2440 - COPPACTm RRORAOE • r NT.10 0AC6 CORSE lrel r RT. .co* 6 came Tom C GRAVEL SWIRO) VT. 1R0301ire b 1lQK$ L SURFACE AID ORDER CORTE SHILL CONRAN TO 1T11O. STA2DARD SPECFICATIO6 8EC1IO4 460 CUM 1 0011114O0 CONCRETE PAVETB4) TYPE 1.1 2. GRAVEL TO BE =MALTED N 6.1FT6 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL SCALE, NTS • r -r 101(61000.000 6• OIIWCE TO > v0RASLE )R CONCRETE CURB DETAIL Vl1 SCALES NTS • r-0• AFTER N0TALLATK14, TRM OUT DEADWOOD AID/CR DEFORMED RIGS. DO NOT CUT LEADER NOTE INSTALL PLANT TO BEAR SAYE IRELATIO041 P TO GRADE AS GROIRY CODITKN GILT 066EYDLn K• PO.YPR7PYLDE OR PCI.TETHTLENE (4D 11L)1 -y' EIDE STRIP (TYP) DOUBLE STRAND N GA SURE 13 STEEL STAKES I CR 6001 POSTS • ITV DEG. 00. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) C / NOTE, 041r A66130LT OPTIO44$. BUT CONTRACTOR 0804646 RILL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MANTANHG TREE 14 A Q • PLUS PONTICN FOR TIE OLR4TIO4 CF 701E GUARANTEE PER= REMOVE ENTIRE NCN•BDDEGRADA1LE WRAP MATERIAL, OR CUT I REMOVE META IA TOP OF TUE WRAP. MN 4. S/EDDED 414IDW'DD MLLCI1 ALL MAT •6 RiTI TRW ALL SIDES ANTED SOIL MIXTURE SEE OPEC COMPACTED 606. MOUD 6CARIF7 BOTTOI A10 60ES 0 PRIOR TO PLANING UOI611RB6D SCE. CR CO•4CTED 000RADE DECIDUOUS PLANTI•G DETAIL 608L6, r • NTS L DEC0)100 101)010100.0)00 1. ).T PFIRVACED DO'AR111LN JONT FILER 6'IENNIR • &DG 0401 0011. COK E18 WAR 11NOU1 NIIRGRAL OR RIRAR N 610004& 00100014014104.0106000(0. CCR•IC. WALK W INTEGRAL CONC. CURB SIDEWALK DETAIL SCALE, M6 • r•r BITU'N016•CIRB AFTER NOTALLATIO1. TIM OR DEAD WDOD AJD.DR MEOWED TWOS DO NOT CUT LEADER NOTE INSTALL RANT TO BEAR SATE RELATION0WP TO GRADE AS GRIME COOITICK 1110 ASSEMBLY, IV POLYPROPYLENE CR POLYETHYLENE (AO MIL) Ih• WOE STEP (TIP) 00.06.E 61RAID N OA UM AID (3) STEEL STAKES CR RCN POSTS • 00 CEO. 04 CONIFER PLANTING DETAIL • SCALE. r • NTS CONFER SHRUB PLANTNG DETAIL TR11 BECK EN 1 DEAD TUGS 016.7 3• SHREDDED NARD40001'RLL4 COPY 4 2o FW64 GRADE PLACE PLANT TO BEAR 641E RELATION6IP TO GRADE AS N P RK0GROIRI- 00011I24 P LANING SOIL !INURE E (5EE EPECJ SC-MET 6OTTO7 AM SIDES a 110.E POOR TO PLANTING COPACTED 6ETTNG BED - USE PLANTED SOIL UNDISTURBED 606. OR COMPACTED SRGRADE 6CALE, r . NTS NOTE. ALL TREE PROTECTION D6vICE6 ARE TO RE INSTALLED PR10R TO 6TAR1 0 LAID DBIYRBANCE AND MANTA6ED NT6. FINAL LND6CAPE B "STALLED. ND PARKING. STORAGE CR OTHER CO$TRICTIO4 617E ACTMTE6 ARE TO OCCUR YITNN TIE TREE PROTECTION AREA TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL 7 1) 4 ROOD STAKE. POSITION AT DRIPLNE STRING 4'.0* WON GR NGE, POLYET1ELENE 6101066 PLACED • 6'•0 00 MO PLACED BETBEEN TREE AND D1TIRBED AREA EX1TRD GRADE SCALEL r . NTS TREE PROTECTKN SAD TO. LIGHT FIXT. ,L 16••0 P TD. CCNC. I PIER r 0T'• TO. CO O. CURB me.r METAL HALIDE LGNT 5TERER LDHTNG 'SOS PTD. STEEL POLE. BT MATIFACTURER STEEL BASE. BY LIGHT MANFACTLRER EXPANBKN JONT. GEE t7P. DETAIL CONCRETE CURB, EEE TYP. DETAIL BITU1NO16 PAVING, SEE TIP. DETAIL TO. FOOTID ME 6TRBCT. Y SITE LGHT6G DETAIL SCALE I.. M6 81TE LIGHT II 11 ARCHITECTS 331 Second Ave. No. Suite 200 Minneapolis MN 55401 SITE LOCATION SFECIYAM• 01 AWRY MS PIEP0(0 Rf YE OR UNDER MT OIRECT 51FERE AN AMRO THAT I AMA DULY REGISTERED MLWTCCT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE 5APE 06 I1IESOTA 0414. 03/14/06 22603 REOSTRARKN No- 1 7 !!!! qio VGI6 SITE <0 N ,v TOM CENTER PR<wr yy N t 1 / 9 9 ,LINO 7455 VILLAGE SHRUB PLANTNG DETAIL TR11 BECK EN 1 DEAD TUGS 016.7 3• SHREDDED NARD40001'RLL4 COPY 4 2o FW64 GRADE PLACE PLANT TO BEAR 641E RELATION6IP TO GRADE AS N P RK0GROIRI- 00011I24 P LANING SOIL !INURE E (5EE EPECJ SC-MET 6OTTO7 AM SIDES a 110.E POOR TO PLANTING COPACTED 6ETTNG BED - USE PLANTED SOIL UNDISTURBED 606. OR COMPACTED SRGRADE 6CALE, r . NTS NOTE. ALL TREE PROTECTION D6vICE6 ARE TO RE INSTALLED PR10R TO 6TAR1 0 LAID DBIYRBANCE AND MANTA6ED NT6. FINAL LND6CAPE B "STALLED. ND PARKING. STORAGE CR OTHER CO$TRICTIO4 617E ACTMTE6 ARE TO OCCUR YITNN TIE TREE PROTECTION AREA TREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAIL 7 1) 4 ROOD STAKE. POSITION AT DRIPLNE STRING 4'.0* WON GR NGE, POLYET1ELENE 6101066 PLACED • 6'•0 00 MO PLACED BETBEEN TREE AND D1TIRBED AREA EX1TRD GRADE SCALEL r . NTS TREE PROTECTKN SAD TO. LIGHT FIXT. ,L 16••0 P TD. CCNC. I PIER r 0T'• TO. CO O. CURB me.r METAL HALIDE LGNT 5TERER LDHTNG 'SOS PTD. STEEL POLE. BT MATIFACTURER STEEL BASE. BY LIGHT MANFACTLRER EXPANBKN JONT. GEE t7P. DETAIL CONCRETE CURB, EEE TYP. DETAIL BITU1NO16 PAVING, SEE TIP. DETAIL TO. FOOTID ME 6TRBCT. Y SITE LGHT6G DETAIL SCALE I.. M6 81TE LIGHT II 11 ARCHITECTS 331 Second Ave. No. Suite 200 Minneapolis MN 55401 I HEREBY CERTIFY 11NT SAS MAN. SFECIYAM• 01 AWRY MS PIEP0(0 Rf YE OR UNDER MT OIRECT 51FERE AN AMRO THAT I AMA DULY REGISTERED MLWTCCT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE 5APE 06 I1IESOTA 0414. 03/14/06 22603 REOSTRARKN No- I f/ VGI6 V FAIRVIEW LAKES CLINIC 9 ,LINO 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN CITY SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE DETAILS DATE : 3/14/05 REVISIONS NO. DATE INFORMATION L1-2 JOB NUMBER 2440 tot O 111:2221:1E= 4=2:0 REIEM2E INSTITUTE 541 PED E O 5 4 II 11 ® ®11 ® ©11 as 11 11 11 11 11 11 \ RECEPTION! IUO ) STORAGE J 1 110 I I 0/ 1 ITS I I - -� ) 0 X10 91004011 EJ 0 S DAFK �L I I II lap / 1 1 11 E0AM E.,.._-=-,1,1110 C�J 0 1111 00 fr - C$J I / ‘ I /ail 14F ° 1 , 1 . , p ' . 1 6 . 1 TO h# X.RAT 0 C>� 0 1$0 r- ---;k6 DEMOLITION PLAN (EXISTS* CONSTRUCTION sew SHADED/ 0 0 0 -aP1c0 1 110 111r - - -� O 11 0 0 111 0 FI1_ GENERAL NOTES A CONTRACTOR TO 0ERFT ALL D4ENSIONS EXISTIG CONSTRICTION !140114 91.1ADED• DEMOLITON NgDN DA91ED DEMOLITION NOTES DEMO EXISTING MASCART WALL O09D EXISTS* PACE ERBIX DEMO EXISTING LOAD REARM PARTITION (DARED N N10LD1 DEro EXISTING WNDOW DEMO EXISTING INTERIOR PARTITION DEMO EXISTING PARTIAL.1EIGNT NTERIOR PARTIMN DEI9D IXOTNG DOOR AND imam DEMO EX151N* MILLWOAO DEMO EX0TI G SIR DEMO EXISTING LOAD WARM PARTITION FOR P43l.T1011 OPENING DEM EXISTING EXTERIOR PARTIAL FEIGN! ER OX WALL I FOOTNGS AS REDD li SCALE. 4' • r.0' EP•LN ARCHITECTS 331 Second Ave. No. Suite 200 Minneapolis MN 55401 I HEREBY CERTIFY T THAT DRS PUN. SPEDFlrA M OR REPORT M a10 0 03/14/03 REGTRATION N No- 22603 Ell Fa FAIRVIEW LINO LAKES CLINIC 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE v•••*„.....✓J LINO LAKES, MN CITY SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DEMOUTON PLAN DATE : 3/14/05 REVISIONS NO. D DATE I INFORMATION Al °® JOB NUMBER 2440 s \ NEW STOOP A10 CANOPY SEE ELEVATION 6E4 STOOP AND UWSPY SEE ELEVATION 4.4 4• -0' 4 -0• S'.4• 4'-0• 4'-0• 4..0. 7 S•P /4 0•� S 4• N2058/0•41r /12.2■111.21101, E XAM ROBREAK 0 EXAM 1 I-J 1 WOK E XAM EXAM 1.01 EXAM EXAM 13-11 WE IF1G1 EXAM 1 I-F 1 EXAM EXAM EXAM TRANNO AMA UTE�.1.. EXAM 10.OGT EXAM EXAM EXAM STRICT. LNTEL NE8 STRICT. LNTEL 1 SCALES DIT xIG•RAr AL c — 4 — — LEAD LNED PARTITIONS NOT RECD DEXA MCIN1E AND COMERS IOFFICE NEW CONTROL 6TAT a/ LEAD LINED PANT CORRIDOR NALL ® ❑0000 NEW STRICT. LNTEL � 1 o 8• 840 0D O TNNl 0 UE SWING 0 099999900QC BLOOD I DRAW 0 OOD DDRAAW II NBA STRICT. LNTEL NEW 1ILLSORC Tl1 -CUT LADI O STS 1434 OFFICE ED I SCALES 000n poop ❑cco888ocr8❑ coo W® 08888888888880 NU RECEPTION COLTER A10 MIAOW TI41411•M RECEP. I 1 j I'I EXAM TRIP DICTATION EXAM 1861 EXAM DICTATION DICTATION EPKI VESTIBULE DECI 4'4• FLOOR FLAN (EXISTNG CONSTRICTION SOWN %LADED) 117.0• EJ T SSC .3. EXI5RG MELDING TODTPRN . SEE DEMO PLAN I 117.0• 3 6,4r I'.4• 4 -C ON- T4 117;0 I-NEW CANOPY TO 1 MATCH EX16TNG •4.1 SCALE: h• • T -0• BP -LN L FILE !I4AR 1 9_2005 II II le : ARCHITECTS 331 Second Ave. No. Suite 200 Minneapolis MN 55401 CCU FAIRVIEW LINO LS CLINIC AKE 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE ,.--) LINO LAKES MN CITY SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION P[AOR FLAN DATE : 3/14/05 REVISIONS NO. DATE INFORMATION A2°0 JOB NUMBER 2440 EXISTNG TRASH EHCLOSURE EXISTIFG NEW CCNSTROCTKN CONNSTR CTKN SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: i• • r -C EX-ELEV NEW PANTED STEEL TRELLIS PEW CAST S50E =PING 10 MATCH EXIST NEW FACE BRICK 10 MATCH EXIST TER PANTED STEEL TRELLIS NEW BRICK FACE CANOPY W( CAST STOTE CQ'* AND 6T 1ORG SEAM PETAL ROOF TO MATCH EXIST !ER CAST RTE COPNY TO MATCH EXIST (T171/ NEW FACE BOCK TO MATCH EXIST (TIP) NEW CAST STONE N.LS TO MATCH EXIST (TIP! EXIBTNG ERICK SCREEN RALL TO REMAIN EAST ELEVATION NEW BRICK FACE CACPY W CAST 6TCFE COPING AND STAVING SEMI PETAL ROCA TO MATCH EXIST NEW CAST STOVE COPING TO MATCH EX16T NEW FACE BMOC TO MATCH MST SCALE: 4• • r-C• EX-ELEV NEVI ORILK FACE CANOPY W( CAST STONE C0N R AND STARONa SEAN PETAL 16OCF TO MATCH EXIST EXI5TTG TRASH ENCLOBRE NORTH ELEVATION REW PANTED STEEL TRELLIS PEW CAST STONE COPRY TO MATCH EXIST NEW FACE ERCK TO MATCH EXIST SCALE: '1• • M1C EX -ELEV NEW EXI6TNG CCNSTRUCTICN COIST51 TIdi UEST ELEVATION SCALE: b• • r -C L EX ELEV /114 4 re • V1 1 ID di ARCHITECTS 331 Second Ave. No. Suite 2(Xl Minneapolis MN 55401 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PIMN. SNP-CAROM OR REPORT WAS MEWED BY WE OR UNDER Iff ORCc1 SIPERI19ON AND THAT N AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE URS Of THE STATE W u11RESOD 03 /N4 /0S 22603 REDDTRADDA RD F 0 rii FAIRVIEW LINO LAKES CLINIC 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN CITY SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE : 3/14/05 REVISIONS NO. DATE INFORMATION A3 JOB NUMBER 2440 8 5 X •1-„,, • gem ;Ler MAR 3 1 2005 ' C41, UPC) LAK. PREL.IMINFLA`r PLAT T1 -1E NO. 2 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ,---, / ,04'../ / :I.:- / / ,-.,,..- / (21 / / / / 4,,,, / ..;.: / k / 4' .„, / tsc'e"' / _;:c euthenY rIght-°t-: 'AYytha.q5Y4 / -. ".."-Snortheost rare, 0. • 2,...2 ...-... / 4'`'. / -06'50E , 1,182 / .z.f. / ....: / A-- / ... / 1 / ,.. 0., / 1, / ',/ '14 227.42 / ot.-■ F llA 'to- 492.-f co fit7F5H:riiir') /./ .,_.1 4' ,-I V ‘...' '`' C 7,C1C:). , t \ ,. ,:■:'-'' • , , r.,,‘, / F. ,_, ,,,,, • 'et CO d 5:, . ‘, • , : n . . . s - t,, • i-, Ill -7- II ..8 &- ' / i-1•, d• / c ..., / s, 1 ..,, cz) .k> dz 'm.,"/•) /I it‘ Izt_,14 s,,y,t„,,,;:1,,,,;;:::::. :;.:::_liC. , ,.. : . 0-kittsyr p, 1 142:016.9. 500" E S ,.,. 0 /- • -7 / 0 pe,b4 / ..- / 1 • 0-E-deed) 244.Z.1 — — — / / L 08'059 . 0•E, — / — / , 5:‘ Found 'P.K. In- — --TOTAL —AREA = a,. 0, ..51A4995 / •- (os bituminous 27.920± sq. ft. cw6alo.7:7-loi., .4.1 (0.64 acres) R.110-5g.. .•••••• • Ci..11•4 / / /..., / / ----. / / ''o„ / / / 1- / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ii --1c.---Found 1/2 Inch Iron pipe marked by R.LS. #9808 / 1.104 / / e>/ 1 G..49,15'40' • C-•• 58.72— — \ /s\ ,0 d;0 • S. TOTAL AREA = 95,403± sq. ft. (2.19 acres) / — 110 / /10 Found 1/2 inch Iron pipe:: marked by R.LS. #9808 / / / / / / / / / / / / / DRAWN BY ERV JOB NO 05156PP !DATE 03-24-05 CHECK BY JAR ID WO 05!56 Aivy SHEE1: of 1 NOTE SEE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY COMSTOCK & DAVIS FOR EXISTING CONDII1ONS ON PROPERTY. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that i am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Reg. No. 25344 NORTH GRAPHIC SC ALE City f Lino Lakes County of ,4tio1c.a Section 1•1, T31, IR22 IGO 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft, • DENOTES 1/2' FOUND IRON MONUMENT MARKED RLS #41578 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot C, all in the record plat of THE VILLAGE NO. 1, Anoka County, Minnesota. and That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of the southerly right-of-way line of the northeast romp of Interstate Highway No. 35W-390, and lying northerly of the following described line: Beginning at o point on the easterly right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 8 and 66 feet southerly from the southerly right-of-way line of the Northeast Ramp of Interstate Highway 35W-390 (sold 66 feet measured at right angles from sold southerly right-of-way Ilne); thence North 81 degrees 39 minutes 10 seconds East (assumed bearing) on o line 66 feet from and parallel to sold southerly right-of-way line and its' easterly extension to the east Ilne of sold Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. • • III 11, : RENGO 25344 !: \C1RCLEPINES/ , rr ° All monuments required by Minnesota Statute, whether shown on this plat or not. mill be set within one year of the recording date of this plat, and shall be evidenced by a 1/2 inch by 18 inch iron pipe marked by RLS 41578. For the purposes of this plat the west line of Lot 1, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 1, Anoka County, Minnesota, is assumed to have a bearing of N2550650"E. AINABE-AND-UTItHY-E45EMCNTS ARC 3110tIN if icoo _f1 L S- t t • BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, ABS BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET AND REAR LOT LINES. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOW ON THIS PLAT. E. RUE> 4 SONS, N. Land Surveyors lussm■ONEVIIMOMI. E MAR 3 1 2005 CITY OF UNO LAKES / / / / / THE VIU,AE NO. 2 / / .j_ / ,:w) / / 54 / o 0 / / 3a / / / '-' / 4 ' / _ / i / -', / i / / \ a`., � / /J.5 \�~ / / , / - r.' Found'P.K. in- - / - • rrf bituminous // / / / b' t A.-08'a5'40" o /u `\?a' 58.72- - I ` \ �--. H r0 /I y° 8k' 0 / a '1'� r W ., / o, I, 'O4r°Fe • 4 / orlry\ -g/o„._ °j^°ni -�Southeriy r,ght °ot HwyiiNo.o3544 nheaet ramv 221.42 / N82 °06'50 °E ' =a1 -1�, 't ..' ;,,,.1,:, N82°O6'S0 "E T :d t'',1tOj A t �v 41.90 244.27 ---'"_ tiSS(N81'39'10.E ^Eed) _ ---''''-'710 1- N82`O6'S0 _ _ -.- VP 3"14 2 Y7 414),N• � / 7 / fl'' 50'50 10q� as /. C"''9 os 69AA / / -- ao' W i-- O 00 r ,1'. ' /' . • coo /,o c -, / /r0 / / / / / / / / f0 '4,...--Found 1/2 inch Iron pipe marked by R.LS. #9808 /., / /10 Found 1/2 inch iron pipe - marked by R.LS. #9808 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 5e GRAPHIC SCALE 50 010 .0 NORTH ® DENOTES MNDOT CAST IRON MONUMENT • DENOTES 1/2" FOUND IRON MONUMENT MARKED RLS #41578 All monuments required by Minnesota Statute, whether shown on this plat or not, will be set within one year of the recording date of this plat, and shall be evidenced by a • 1/2 inch by 18 inch Iron pipe marked by RLS 41578. For the purposes of this plat the west line of Lot 1, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 1, Anoka County, Minnesota. is assumed to have a bearing of N25°06'S0 "E. ( IN FELT ) 1 inch = 50 ft. City cf LInc Lakee County of Anoka Section 11, T31, R22 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation, fee owner, and Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated In the City of Lino Lakes, State of Minnesota, County of Anoka, to wit: Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot C, all in the record plot of THE VILLAGE N0. 1, Anoka County, Minnesota. That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of the southerly right -of -way line of the northeast romp of Interstate Highway No. 35W -390, and lying northerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the easterly right -of -way line of Trunk Highway No. 8 and 66 feet southerly from the southerly right -of -way line of the Northeast Ramp of Interstate Highway 35W -390 (said 66 feet measured at right angles from said southerly right -of -way line); thence North 81 degrees 39 minutes 10 seconds East (assumed bearing) on a line 66 feet from and parallel to sold southerly right -of -way line and its' easterly extension to the east Tine of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as THE VILLAGE NO. 2 and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said Clty of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by Its proper officers this day of 200— The City of Lino Lakes City Mayor City Clerk John Bergeson Gordon Heltke STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation. an behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 200 -_, by John Bergeson, Mayor of the 200_ by Gordon Heltke, City Clerk of the In witness whereof said Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 200_. Fairview Health Services Daniel K. Anderson President of Fairview Lakes Regional Medical Center of Fairview Health Services STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200.— by Donid K. Anderson, as President of Fairview Lakes Regional Medical Center of Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as THE VILLAGE N0. 2; that this plat is o correct representation of said survey, Mot all distances are correctly shown on the plot In feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments will be correctly placed In the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on said plat and that there are no wet lands as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 505.02 Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated other than as shown on said plat. Jason E. Rud. Land Surveyor DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS Minnesota Registration No. 41578. -+ H-5.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA 5.0O --� T- COUNTY OF ANOKA 10.00 10.1:0 The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate wee acknowledged before me this day of 200 -_, by Jason E. Rud, Land _ i _J L I _ _ Surveyor. f f BEING 5 FEET 101,501N AND ADJONING SIDE LOT LINES, AND BENG 10 FEET IN mom AND ADJOINING STREET AND REAR LOT LINES UNLESS 01HERINSE 511011N ON THIS PLAT. Notary Public, Anoka County, Mlnnesoto My Commission Expires This plat of THE VILLAGE NO. 2 was approved by the Clty Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 200_, and If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By Mayor By This plat has been checked and approved this — day of 200 Larry O. Holum Anoka County Surveyor Clerk E. G. FLO 4 SONS, N. Land Sur./swore • AGENDA ITEM V. D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: April 13, 2005 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat Marshan Meadows Bruggeman Homes BACKGROUND Bruggeman Homes has requested approval of the a preliminary plat for a residential development called Marshan Meadows. The site is just north of the Gethesemene Church, between Lake Drive and Marshan Lake. The proposal includes the creation of 20 single family lots. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the zoning for the site. Review of the submittal has resulted in the need for a variance for the dimension of one lot. Design of this site is complicated by the location of an existing road, location of an existing road easement, and the shoreland requirements for larger lot sizes along the lake and a large setback from the lake. Please note that we received a revised plan on April 4th with 20 lots. This replaces a March 14 submittal that had 18 lots and an outlot. The outlot has been broken into two developable lots, Lots 13 and 14, Block 2. The City Engineer's review refers to the March 14 submittal. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning The comprehensive plan put the site within a Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area, within the existing MUSA, and guides it for Low Density Sewered Residential development. This allows for three units per acre. number of units 20 gross area 11.41 acres upland (net) area 10.53 acres gross density 1.75 units /acre net density 1.90 units /acre • • • Marshan Meadows page 2 The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -2 North residential Low Density Unsewered Resid. R -1 South church and residence Public /Semi - Public and Low Density Sewered Residential R -3 and R -1 East Marshan Lake Marshan Lake West industrial park Industrial Light Industrial The site is guided for Low Density (up to 3 units /acre) but zoned R -2, which is a medium density zone. This should have been corrected previously by amending either the zoning or the comprehensive plan. The application is for single family development, which is consistent with the comprehensive plan density. Single family homes are a permitted use in the R -2 zone. Therefore, the project complies with both the comp plan and the zoning. (Incidentally, the preliminary plat incorrectly lists the zoning as R -1.) Note that on property to the north and south, the zoning is not consistent with the comprehensive plan. This is something that should be corrected, but is not an issue for this project. Growth Management, MUSA Reserve and Units/Year: The site is within the existing MUSA, so there is no need to use MUSA reserve acres. The attached table at the end of this report shows the status of the staging plans for new residential units according to the growth management policy. No additional residential units can be final platted this year unless they are part of a conservation development. The 20 new units in Marshan Meadows could receive preliminary plat approval this year but must wait to be final platted in 2006. Preliminary Plat Streets and Driveways: The City holds a road easement on property south of the site. The road easement is a continuation of Stage Coach Trail. This easement was a condition of the subdivision in 1997 that created a separate lot for the parsonage for Gethesemene Church, which owns that land. The road was not constructed, but is to be constructed when the property develops. The Marshan Meadows plat includes the extension of Stage Coach Trail to the north and a connection to Lake Drive. These are important pieces of a neighborhood transportation system for the area. The plat also includes a cul de sac to serve eight interior lots. Submitted plans include a future development plan showing ghost plats for land to the north and south. The street as extended would allow for future development, though there may be some limitations on house sizes on individual lots. • • • Marshan Meadows page 3 It is possible that Bruggeman Homes may be able to acquire the property to the south. This would facilitate developing that site and coordinating its design with this plat. All that may include realigning the road near where the properties meet. This can be accommodated with a new preliminary plat in the future that would alter the southern lots along the road. An additional 20 ft. of right of way is being dedicated to Anoka County for Lake Drive. This will result in 60 ft. from centerline and a full 120 ft. right of way in this location. The additional right of way includes two triangles at the road intersection to accommodate future traffic signals. A right of entry will be dedicated to Anoka County to prevent direct access to Lake Drive from any of the new lots. The existing road system can accommodate the additional traffic generated by 20 new homes. However, there may need to be some improvement to Lake Drive. The existing situation includes a southbound right turn lane into Park Court, a southbound through lane, a northbound through lane, and a northbound bypass lane. In the northbound direction, the bypass lane allows vehicles to bypass vehicles turning left into the new business park. Improvements for Marshan Meadows likely will include a new right turn lane for northbound traffic. It also could include an extension of the existing bypass lane, making it a de facto through lane. The striping and new construction will have to be worked out. Anoka County will need to determine this. Lots: Under R -2 standards, the minimum single family lot area is 10,800 sf of upland. This site is within a shoreland overlay. Lots along the lake must be 20,000 sf, All lots meet the area requirements. The shoreland overlay requires a 150 ft. setback from the ordinary high water level. The plan meets this requirement. The minimum lot width for single family lots in an R -2 zone is 80 feet, with 100 feet for a corner lot. The minimum lot depth is 135 feet, with 145 for double- frontage lots. All lots meet these requirements except for one, a variance for which is discussed below. The southern lots along the road may change in the future if Bruggeman acquires the land to the south. This could be accomplished with a new preliminary plat at that time. Variance: Lot 2, Block 3 is under the minimum lot depth. Block 3 is defined by the northern property boundary and the need to align the new road with the existing Park Court on the west side of Lake Drive. In addition, the minimum lot areas for lots abutting the lake prevents the new extension of Stage Coach Trail from moving farther east. At 13,492 sf, Lot 2 is 2692 sf (25 %) over the minimum lot area of 10,800 sf. It also exceeds the minimum lot width of 100 ft. These physical factors justify a lot depth variance for Lot 2, Block 3. As stated in Section 2, Subd. 4 of the zoning ordinance, in considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. • Marshan Meadows page 4 b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, are ample size regarding area and width. Block 3 is bounded by the northern property boundary and Lake Drive. The need to create a road connection to the north and to align a road with the existing Park Court create the east and south boundaries of Block 3. Shoreland lot areas and setbacks prevent moving the new Stage Coach Trail east to allow Lot 2 to be larger and have a full lot depth in an east/west measurement. This is a unique situation due to these factors, and granting a lot depth variance for Lot 2, Block 3 is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance Park Dedication: The subdivision ordinance includes park dedication requirements. Park dedication is $2075 per residential unit, less any land dedication. There is no land dedication • needed. The park dedication will be $2075 x 20 new home lots = $41,500. Utilities: Water and sanitary sewer are available in Lake Drive. The water main must be constructed to the southern property boundary to allow for a future loop to the existing Shores of Marshan Lake neighborhood. The final piece of this loop will be created when the property between Marshan Meadows and Shores of Marshan develops. The existing home will be removed. The existing well must be properly capped and the existing septic system must be properly abandoned. The church on the south of the site has a septic system and well. The stormwater pond for the Marshan Meadows project must be 50 feet from these. Plans submitted in 1991 for the church's septic system show the system's drainfield approximately 90 feet from the property line. A 2002 plan shows the well 80 feet from the property line. Grading and Stormwater Management: The plan includes two ponds which ultimately discharge to the wetlands along Marshan Lake. The Rice Creek Watershed District issued a conditional approval on January 26, 2005. However, the review was of of an earlier version with six lots along the lake. The reduction of two lots on the lake and addition of a lot elsewhere likely will not significantly differ from that plan from a water quality perspective. The new plan must receive a permit from RCWD prior to city council approval of the final plat. As noted above, the site is within a shoreland overlay. No disturbance will occur within the shoreland protection area, which is one -half of the 150' setback from the OHWL. • Marshan Meadows page 5 Conservation Easement: Several rare species may exist in the area: Forsters' tern, a water nesting bird, and Blanding's turtle. The developer will provide a conservation easement as well as the normally required drainage and utility easement. Both easements will cover the same area —ten feet beyond the wetland edge —but the conservation easement will include additional restrictions such as no mowing or dumping of clippings. There also will be a special packet of educational information supplied to homeowners and monuments at the property borders of all lake lots. Monument Sign: The tree and landscaping plan shows an "entry identification sign ", which would be located on Lot 1, Block 3. The sign ordinance allows such a sign (area identification sign) to be not more than 24 sf and no higher than six feet. The area applies to the actual sign portion only, but the entire structure cannot exceed six feet in height. The developer must submit information regarding ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the monument sign. At the very latest, this must be provided for city council review of the final plat. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Approval of the project should include the following conditions: 1. A variance for the lot depth of Lot 2, Block 1 is approved. 2. The existing well must be properly capped and the existing septic system must be properly abandoned per all applicable requirements. 3. The new plan revised April 2005 must receive a permit from RCWD prior to city council approval of a final plat. 4. Park dedication shall be cash in the amount of $41,500 shall be paid (20 lots @ $2075). 5. Issues discussed in the March 28, 2005 TKDA memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. The Stage Coach Trail and the water line shall be constructed to the south property line as shown in the April 4, 2005 plans. 7. A temporary cul de sac shall be constructed on the north end of the property. 8. Lot line easements shall be shown on the final plat. 9. Right of entry along Lake Drive shall be dedicated to Anoka County on the final plat. 10. Anoka County permit requirements shall be met for the new road access to Lake Drive, including improvements to Lake Drive. • Marshan Meadows page 6 11. A conservation easement shall be granted over the drainage and utility easement along the wetlands bordering the lake. Easement restrictions shall be defined prior to city council approval of the final plat. 12. The entry monument sign must comply with the sign ordinance. The developer must submit information regarding ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the monument sign. This must be provided prior to city council review of the final plat. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the project by approving: • lot depth variance for Lot 2, Block 3, to allow the lot as shown on the preliminary plat • preliminary plat with the listed conditions of approval. 2. Return to staff with direction. ipRECOMMENDATION Option 1 This review is based on the following plans and information: Preliminary Plat, 3/3/05 and 4/4/05 Preliminary Utilities Plan, 3/3/05 Preliminary Grading Plan, 3/3/05 Preliminary Tree and Landscaping Plan, 3/3/05 Future Development Plan, 3/3/05 • • 0) r X N ' O R 0 M r E , 0 N O 521 0) N N— r(0 0 M 1521 N N- N- I' N 0 N CO M CO •- U) �- N 0 CV 6251 remaining of annual 147 -1 -29 -24 50 114 147 147 remaining of 1029 for pre -2010 404 exceeds target of 147 by 1 29 24 percent 0.7% 19.7% 16.3% Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) O 0 0 N Co 0 0 N O 0 N co co co M O 0 0 N M N N 0) L() O 0 N N L() r- L() O r N CO M N CO r- LC) h r ,:t O 0 N ID.- 0 CD 0 0 N- N n M O 0 N N 1) CO L() .1- 0 0 r CO N ('V N,- N- CO 'Cr r N O 0 N LI) e- '4) year end E ra - 0 1 0 co 0 O 249 — O 561 O '- co N N 0 -- d' N O N 181 CO r- u) r N 0 N Development Name approved prelim. plats • . 1Stonevbrook C , Q C N Century Farms North Keefe: prel plat, not final plat Morton (minor subdiv) Ravens Hollow Haley Manor (10 new lots) Crystal Cove Millers Crossroads ILakeview Estates (2 new) Snell (minor subdivision) Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th Justin's Preserve Marshan Estates Rice Creek Church duplex Rice Church: Oakwood View _ 13 13 Q Ln = --, Highland Meadows East 2nd Marshan Townhonnes 2nd Pheasant Hills 12th island West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add Vaughan Addition lAngie's Acres (1 new) proposed Marshan Lakeview (2 new) Marshan Meadows total •U. ? U H C TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Marshan Meadows 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Scott A. Brink, P.E. Date: March 28, 2005 Comm. No. 13265 -002 Routing: The proposed Marshan Meadows development is located on just over 11 acres of property along the east side of Lake Drive (CSAH 23) across from newly constructed Marshan Lake Court, and just south of Marshan Lane. The proposed development provides for the construction of 18 single family residential units. Previous reviews dated March 2, 2005 and January 4, 2005 have been provided. Recently, the following additional documents have been received: 1. Full and half -size copies of the revised Preliminary Plan set dated March 3, 2005. ,Executive Summary • The revised plans provide additional construction detail that was not provided in the previous submittal. However, at least some additional construction detail is required, as explained further. Additional comments from Anoka County and the City have also been received since the previous review. 1. The proposed development shall be subject to the review and approval of Anoka County, including to, but not limited to the following: a) The applicant must attain a permit from the County for the proposed street access as shown. It is expected that the County will require at least some modifications and/or adjustments to Lake Drive (widening, turn lanes, etc.). These modifications (including construction details) shall be shown on the plans accordingly. b) The property may also be subject to any further right of way requirements of the County. The plan appears to provide for the County's typical requirement of providing 120 feet of right of way (60 feet each side of centerline) by providing 20 feet of additional dedication. In addition, it is anticipated that a traffic signal may eventually be needed at the street access intersection area, and the new street itself. c) Any work within the County right of way shall require a permit as required by Anoka County. A temporary cul -de -sac must be provided on the north and south ends of the project. The cul -de -sacs must also be signed "future street extension" per City requirements. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Marshan Meadows 2 March 28, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • • • 3. A Ghost Plat must be provided to show the road shift and lot splits to the south. The individual streets on the plans should also be identified or given names. 4. The utility plans must provide additional detail prior to approval for construction. Pipe lengths, slopes, and profiles must all be provided. 5. The sanitary sewer plan has been modified to provide for the extension of sanitary sewer to the site from an existing stub at Park Court, rather than from Stagecoach Trail. It is recommended that the extension into the property and subsequent run to the north end of the property be kept as low in elevation as possible (minimum grades) in order to maximize service to the north in the future. It would appear that the connection at Park Court may be slightly lower to gain some additional elevation. 6. The watermain termination at the north end of the property should provide an additional stub for future service and looping. 7. The property shall be subject to the review and approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). A copy of an approved permit and conditions from RCWD must be provided. 8. The low floor elevations of Lots 1 -5 (Block 2) do not meet the City's minimum elevation requirements with regards to the projected 100 -year elevation of the adjacent infiltration area (2 foot minimum clearance). In addition, the lowest ground opening of each structure must be at least 1 foot above the emergency overflow elevation. Emergency overflow locations and elevations are not shown on the plans. 9. Development of the property will require the demolition and removal of existing structures and facilities (above ground and under ground). This may include the capping of wells and/or removal of septic treatment facilities. All removal and disposal work shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the city of Lino Lakes, State of Minnesota, and any other agencies as applicable. Other Comments Geotechnical 1. The applicant shall be responsible for attaining any permits as required for de- watering. 2. Geotechnical information was provided in the previous submittal. Soil borings reported that much of the site consists of areas of lacustrine soils consisting of topsoil and sandy silts. These areas are considered unsuitable for buildings and the direct support of streets and utilities. In these areas, soils will need to be excavated, removed, and replaced with compacted granular material as recommended by the geotechnical engineer. It is recommended that notes be provided on both the grading and utility plans that provide for the removal and replacement of unsuitable soils as recommended, and that the geotechnical engineer be retained throughout the duration of construction to monitor actual Marshan Meadows 3 March 28, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota site conditions and construction requirements. Any imported fill to the site must be approved by the City Engineer. Grading and Drainage Drainage calculations were provided for the previous review, and comments were provided as follows: • • 1. An emergency overflow location and elevation must be provided and shown for the north infiltration basin. This is necessary to ascertain that the low floor and low building opening elevations provided meet requirements. Based upon the elevations provided on the plan, it would appear that the lowest opening elevation on at least some of the housing units do not meet the minimum requirements. A summary of the requirements are as follows: The lowest floor elevation must be at least 4 feet above normal water elevations (including groundwater), and at least 2 feet above the project 100 -year elevation. In addition, the lowest building opening must be at least 1 foot above the emergency overflow elevation. 2. An application must be made to the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), and a copy of the application provided to the City. The plans shall therefore be subject to any further conditions and requirements of the RCWD. Final approval by the City shall be conditional upon approval of RCWD. 3. Proposed condition curve numbers shall use NRCS type "B" soil in all disturbed areas where NRCS type "A" soils exist under existing conditions. 4. City rate control requirements provide that the proposed 1, 10, and 100 year discharge rates not exceed the existing 1, 10, and 100 year discharge rates. The 1 and 10 year information must be submitted. 5. The infiltration basins shall be planted with native grasses and plants. The City of Lino Lakes has a specification for plantings which shall be referred to or included in the plans. Utilities The utility plans as provided are not considered to be complete for construction purposes. Pipe sizes, slopes, profiles, construction details, etc. must be provided. Further comments will be provided upon the receiving of full construction plans. The proposed 8 -inch watermain for the proposed development is shown connecting directly to the end of the 12 -inch watermain crossing stub. A reducer and valve will be required at the connection point. However, in consideration of possible future extension of main along the east side of Lake Drive, it is instead recommended that the 8 -inch main be connected to a cross that also provides for future 12 -inch extensions to the north and south as may be required in the future. Ma. a.rshan Meadows 4 March 28, 2005 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • Portions of the storm sewer appear to be designed such that shallow portions may not provide two feet of cover over the pipe, which should be provided. However, pipe sizes and complete storm sewer information have not yet been provided. Therefore, further comments will be provided when final construction plans are presented for review. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining permits for the utility extensions as required from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and Met Council Environmental Services (MCES). Other Comments • 1 1. The 30 foot street width (gutter to gutter) and 60 foot wide right of ways as shown are acceptable. A note should also be provided that existing subgrade material shall be removed and replaced with compacted granular at locations and depths as directed by the City Engineer or the geotechnical engineer. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for the verification of any existing well and septic locations on both the subject property and adjoining properties to assure compliance with the State of Minnesota requirements as previously expressed. In addition, development of the property will require the removal of existing buildings, surface structures, and possibly underground facilities. The applicant shall be responsible for the proper removal of all facilities in accordance with State of Minnesota and City of Lino Lakes regulations. 3. As previously stated, the plat, including access from CSAH 23 will be subject to the review and approval of Anoka County. ---------- _-_-_-____ a / C rJL ail -IWO • c 1. SUNSE-T • P- • I • 1 • lesiwiie_j_ Ittf• d4RM.NOR !!! j ittissit:Httal • ;slit si•ialt i1:31-LINO AIR PARK kORILIA1 1 .° ft Tic-67 flP rnlO/L LJ JJ SHERWOOD I7 a I 0 • 1 ,• , • —1-- , . • SREEN-- 3. r I 1 • . • 21,11 SIG 1 • 1. att•S' I CI 1211211•1•11 whiltt. 1" 1 I"! i ri 1 kAKEI • 1 I I I , Ili • 1.42 ; 141.1 • lala itottimaslat'tslas L aala•tatialtiallasaway i • 4:•'; .t• 474-7. to •t; YTT. • , II 2 1.1.1..- ARM 5T.H AIM CENT RI( -ADD • Ott OD • 1 • George Watch La r— 1,24414,1a ••111! 107,—, UL(EASXLSRL • 4,--. 1 2ND 000-- n4 ia 1-7-- silialjlPil---- . i a 'fitlitklii? -:;•1--- •----,C," tiak•Is• zt --'•"1.:09 _ ,! -SP-07a/AE *r. ▪ • -, zii OTHICADZI V ■t a -TY- _ .....— :"..\., N;:st , AID SO -<1-Nsi`t5 -.. REG LAND, UR' VEW x• ••■41,q.*±,4,0‘ N.,.....,... NO 0 aki3;,?,:te 1OF'RES ANA L1.4. • • S 0 100 200 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH - 100 FEET CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY i SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 350 FT OF GOVT LOT 3, SEC 17. T. 31. R. 22 EASTERLY R/8 LINE OF CSA.H. N0. 23 (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MINNESOTA TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 8) J G,11142'05- CENTER UNE OF CSA.H. NO 23- (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MINNESOTA TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 8) WERANO ,)BOUNDARY 6 4. 6 891.6 • f -_J TREE LINE -904- FENCE UNE ORDINARY HIGH WATER UNE MARSHAN LAKE ST - 8902.4 3 EAST UNE OF THE - -� NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 NEST LINE OF THE SEC. 17, T. Jr, R. 22 GOVT LOT 3, ISEC 17, T. 31, R. 22 • SOUTH UNE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 er SEC 17, T. 31, R. 22 _ -902--. 1 , ST-5 SOUTH UNE Of GOVT LOTS 901.9 SEG. 17. 7.31. R. 22 1 ,- 1 5.541 -., N89'5451 "W 1(133± • ST-3' 8908, '1149 02 / 1 \ - -NORTH LINE 0' TRACT 0 R. LS NO. T8; RETAINING .�, R/ ■ , I \ 11 WALL lCHT- OF -WAri 1 r SURVEY LINE." / ;EASEMENTS LS NO 182 Irp _57 -6 �` �.. �. � 895.0, \ \' I' X\ 60 4 1 FENCE �/ . .0 / ,Y'{ LW( -Ly0 , .rWEST LI,vE OF \ 1 ' L TRACT C rrR.LS 90. /82 / ep/ / L J - /' 92- !v \ / / / M, c g9° 8 %� ` 4 / 4 / / i, `� FENCE I : ; / I / -� -- /UNE �0 ,� ` �'69 ?_� / �, _ -7 _1 _ -1- _ fi - FT =� -l- / I I I . I . I .. I .. 1 ,;I : Al -E: PAAPIIIVESST.I- Marco in - N1 S 1141h Ave; FIe' a 1 I1 a;. ar 74111 StPe .400' Mrvy St ,4 i S76 34 F !9 0 13,492 S.F. LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of the center line of Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 8. AND Government Lot 3, in Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part lying West of the center line of Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 8 and ALSO EXCEPT that part of said Government Lot 3 lying Northerly of the following described line and its westerly extension thereof: Conanencing at the intersection of the Easterly right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 8 with the South Tine of the North 350 feet of said Government Lot 3; thence Southwesterly along said Easterly right-of-way line a distance of 260 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Southeasterly deflecting to the left 101 degrees 42 minutes 05 seconds to the West shore of Marshan land and there terminating. TYPICAL DRAINAGE & UIILI TY EASEMENT ARE i I 5• -�L 5. L /0 1 ' BEING 5 FEET IN MOTH, UN ESE OTHERIWS£ INDICATED. AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT AND REAR LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING STREET LOT LINES, AS SHOWN ON 714E PLAT. (ONLY NON- TYPICAL EASEMENTS SHOWN) LOT REQUIREMENTS/SETBACKS MINIMUM LOT SIZE 10,800 SO. FT. SHORELAND LOT SIZE 20,000 50. FT. MINIMUM LOT WOO* INTERIOR LOT 80 FT. CORNER LOT 100 FT. MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 135 FT. DOUBLE FRONTAGE LOTS 145 FT. SE MACK S FROM STREET LOCAL STREET JO FT. COLLECTOR STREET 40 FT. REAR YARD PRINCIPLE BUILDING 30 FT. ACCESSORY BUILDING 5 FT SIDE YARD PRINCIPLE BUILDING 10 FT. ACCESSORY BUILDING 5 FT. SITE DESCRIPTION EXISTING ZONING - R -1 PROPOSED ZONING - R -1 AREA OF PROPERTY - 17.47 ACRES TOTAL PROPOSED LOTS - 18 TOTAL AREA OF UPLAND - 10.53 ACRES OWNER/DEVELOPEFt Bruggeman Homes 3564 Rolling View Drive White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Phone: (651) 770 -2981 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR 1611 HIGHWAY 70 N.E. SPRING LAKE PARK. MINNESOTA 55432 PHONE: (763) 780 -4100- 0P 4;/18,409 S.F. 1 3x6,{0 EX/SDNG .HOUSE ro SE REMOVED 13,081 S.F. 2 �y 14,797 S.F. 3 el 4• \/O /4/. 90 ��F r3 / .- „a 17,278 S.F. i 8 , 18, 051 S.F. / // • 80' 76' 9' N 13,890 S.F. 9J - 88' 10,810 S.F. 4 1.5.5 20.002 S.F. I 4 6,1 I I 1 i/�ti/ 1 1 I t«_ I w 7 1 WETLAND D: 1 KJOLHAUC til 3 1 70/19/04 , L 120,004 sq. /t\ __„_, IN, —_-1_- 154' 787 --t 1 of 60 120 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 60 FEET (22•• X 34•' SHEET) I INCH + 120 FEET (11” X 17" SHEET) INEAIION BY VIRONMEN TAL SERNCES 10 20,001 107 79 IA 10 0 ly IA m m a 017 �• 5 14,212 S.F. 1 44 ' \1 3 x0.22 153, °m' 3 2 h s4• • , eoa �� ao• 6 g5 80' 83 80 _ p0: 1 CONSERVA DON POSTS TO BE PLACED ® IN TER SEC DON OF PROP. LINE AND CONSERVA DON -0&U EASEMEN T (TYP. ) (SEE DETAIL) 11,010 S.F. 70,808 S.F. u 17,653 S.F. \\ 24, 220' S f — �0- 5C70ACif t1 N&12 259' 96' 80' 13 80• 14 154 N89°54 51"W 1023t 5 „4 MARSHAN MEADOWS PASSE ENGINEERING, INC. PRELIMINARY PLAT CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS MINNEAPOLIS , HUDSON , CAMBRIDGE (763)780- 4100 (715)381- 1150 (763)689-4042 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ErtwB: passelDpasse- erg.um 8 313 i CI J iMAPIWEV. B.hn, Ls .. tr'i ul LA. sr . CI Marva Ln ,,,. 5 I. S 4' 714th Av4,77f 2 i C . 7417 4.1C1' S4.1C1' i.Mwwv St ,P 2.4' z OOm 180012 1n, St 1 10517 Ln Naj 10407 L7 Nit; 1037d La Nai sa North Rd 1 w E r , , Post Rd At1w RECEIVED MAR 1 4 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES 13,492 S.F. I U 612004 Mapouaat.cam, Inc : 02004 NAVTE SITE LOCATION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION •Esc S0 I xiSIINO H 1/S( ID 67 RIMDKD 11,698 5.F. . All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17. Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, M'innes'ota, lying Easterly of the center tine of Minnesota Tnmk Highway No. & AND Government Lot 3, in Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part lying West of the center line of Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 8 and ALSO EXCEPT that part of said Government Lot 3 lying Northerly of the following described line and its westerly extension thereof Commencing at the intersection of the Easterly tight-of-way line of Tnmk Highway No. 8 with the South line of the North 350 feet of said Government Lot 3; thence Southwesterly along said Easterly rigid-of-way line a distance of 260 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Southeasterly deflecting to the left 101 degrees 42 minutes 05 seconds to the West shore of Marshan Land and there terminating. TYPICAL DRAINAGE t URUTY EASEMENT ARE: r0' 1 BEING 5 FEET IN /MOTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT AND REAR LOT ONES, AND 10 FEET W 1410TH UNLESS OINERW1SE INDICATED AND ADJOINING STREET LOT LINES, AS SHOWN oN THE PLAT (ONLY NON - TYPICAL EASEMENTS SHOWN) LOT REQUIREMENTS/SETBACKS MINIMUM LOT SIZE 10.800 SO. FT. SHORELAND LOT SIZE 20.000 SO. FT. MINIMUM LOT W10TH.• INTERIOR LOT 80 FT. CORNER LOT 100 FT MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 135 FT. DOUBLE FRONTAGE LOTS 145 PT SETBACKS FROM STREET LOCAL STREET 3D FT. COLLECTOR STREET 40 FT. REAR YARD PRINCIPLE BUILDING 30 FT. ACCESSORY BUILDING 5 FT. SIDEYARD PRINCIPLE BUILDING 10 FT. ACCESSORY BUILDING 5 FT. SITE DESCRIPTION 0575r1NG 209400 - R -1 PROPOSED SWING - R -1 AREA OF PROPERTY - 11.4/ ACRES TOTAL PROPOSED LOTS + 18 TOTAL AREA OF UPLAND . 7053 ACRES OWNER/DEVELOPER Bruggeman Homes 3564 Rolling View Drive White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Phone: (651) 770 -2981 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR P4446 6•144424:411+.6. IP N ID N.E. SPRING LAKE LAKE PARK, MINNESOTA 55432 PHONE: (763) 780 -4100 13,481 S.F. --r- 17,823 S.F. w - go• 64 — 10,838 S.F. 4 I, 16,791 S.F. 16 Bob 24,850 S.F. I - WETLAND O INEATION 8Y I .3 1\ _WETLAND t4NVIRONM£NTAL SERVICES I /0 P /20.004 sq.11k I -J 6 - - -- e k _` 1:"." 2 \� P R N x \et ,Ai60 \ }o P '; i \ i " 1 155, 138 S.F. \\ e �� rn \t 1 n� I� U 0 CONSERVATION P PLACED INTERSECTION OF PROP. LINE AND \ \\\," \CONSERVATION-D&U EASEMENT (TYP.) \ n \ \Y/ (SEE DETAIL) A \ \ \.' \ \\ 7, \ 0 60 120 SCALE IN F.-ET 1 INCH . 60 FEET (22- X 34- SHEET) 1 INCH - 720 FEET (11' X 17' SHEET) 11.143 S.F. 11,111 S.F. OUTLOT A 25,563 S.F. 257' f 97' 80• 235' N89'54 '51-W 1023.* 174' 4 ) e. AL Iv V ////////) f rzi PRELIMINARY PLAT LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA a 1 1 a a s 4 1 j The locution of underground ufA'Iiei shorn hereon ore approximate and ore dosed on held locations OI visible structures or markings OI dor lime of our sumey end compiling information furnishfd tlT ,Mtous utility componies and governmental agencies. MATERIALS SANITARY 8" MAIN — SOR 35 PVC SERVICE — SCHEDULE 40 WATERMAIN 8' CL 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE 6' CL 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE SERVICE — 7" TYPE K COPPER ALL r SANHAOy MAW • 040E AMMAN RECEIVED MAR 1 4 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES TX. MN i CTO \ • • CONNECT V, EXISTING SAN./ N 4 INFILTRATION AREA REQUIRED AREA =.DJJ ACRE / DESIGN AREA =.054 ACRE NWL= Hitt =896.0 / 900.5 887.2 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 60 FEET (22- S 34" SHEET) i INCH = 120 FEET or X 17" SHEET) WETLAND 0 INEATION BY 3 1 \' KJOLHAUG NRONMENTAL SERVICES 10/19/04 HOPE PIPE __J \ 886,0 • 2 1t `V 1\ ' f \ 1t R 5 \ \ P $33 � \, g t o�v� \ CONSERVATION POSTS TO BE PLACED • INTERSECTION OF PROP. LINE AND 3, ONSERVA TION —D&U EASEMENT (TYP.) (SEE DETAIL) 03.5'. 893.5.' OUTLOT A 11 12 NWL=895.0 Hilt =897.2 10:7 BENCH FROM 894.0 -895.0 REQUIRED SEDIM. VOL. =0.68 ACRE —FT DESIGN SEDIM. Yt7L. _ • r' "1MfINK'IN? 4 (1, 11•r +• `VV ) ItNTINd'InN:T aN COD Nrry1L DLA., mo. NI ell. a NM II I•W\I/A. 410 ant, eA• 40/ A:' CItNR DNfV NWRI ON •4 CUT Rh �TM1 CAVANN, r IN. Tow 1. AN /N O //04 /HA SJ41 AST ,.IM ERNS 1 AN^CrA„IN:, 1141 URRA.INAS404N DS.t:�ry, wDr,,,, . M'IUW:11N rRi Wf1, 1 ••• C.1• r amp "rj'I1r .... .,.L4 Earn •Ro•an .14A Oro or. IN, T ADS M.- :IN51YU': IflM .lN NR 41'1 d 104 :•IMCMNFIN• .1 145141, PITON i1V 1011 AND I e1 MIMI MIAMI 1 NIY� 1 I.� WKN NININM 31 Ken • LUCAT.7NS' IS OF4'rAYIDND IOU 1 II S JOIN .6 O.MCR 'NOM III txCAR1 ON I L'INSINLgIN II SIJN SIN I3V0141104[ IN WWII.. AN 'ATOM AND CONSTRICTION P 0NOINKR IA' MN•M'NI WTINI RN ROWS PP (1Ke tIllNJ41(R C1NINt Ni 141108 iI,g ..lj:Ir .9014451 CENIN! M AWR/3' IRIS, N IN IN ACC W ifflOA ODE JOIN Ir6Nl a, MMANNI Iwo 151 I N114wNN1 AND 5110 AND ARTA S(•166205 3' MOM 01311• CIO SM CNI Ix t M ACC(R D WIT 5 IM /lot 44111,81[0 TIP 11 rCIC IC 4111 OAK 41! vK ;51 fACL0N SARI f tIKIO2 I ALl. ON .04A5 a Sl rl Cm D04 •0.004.5 KID M RCAS WON N4fw On MICAS Al IN MI( Or IA LRSt Of 4Ll '6 Ae0 V11N Acs.c Al 1 MACH 044 41 141 44111 1.3 Op TONS 144 4CN (*0 a 1,W.2 !SC AKIRIN 0 51 COF.(IL U1121 C (OSI.CLNSINLCIION I4LCI /!N O 148011? 501 IO I 55114 '(0 50[1024[ 15 CIIM'LCI(l . +l KItlK ALL S'! wISIIS I" OO � 31 ROAM' 15N1 ACCCPISNLS 1F AS 11 I «NCI 'I Cx LOANS WON FINAL P(RNAACNI 5CD1MN)1L'ON, CINiROM S, RR'S NOCAI CONSTRUCT IRO LLNIRACIOR K 6PCCS r0 ARI P1 KT VON INC NPCA'S 5104. KNI 5IGRNVA OCR SNIIN.LMC 01MC55(4 (2450(104 I4, PCRNII 4248[ 11 FIR IY INN Rl RELINING RONf. OR ROCS NC MI5 KRMI/ AND • 6.II5 INC GI(IDC1 IKS 5(1 ('MIN IN /NG YAI(R DwL1r1 IN LAWN •0EA5, RCS? (M NIANC5071 AND 1K US-(PA1 FOR CCNSINK1IW AC11'1111(6 31 INC 113(111 rKNIS INCLU. PCRWA6NI CR0STMS'PAIR& PI IN S(IC NANN E .L 1Kl DOING ROIL CPI 5CDIKN7 ON PAVCO CCS CATCH RASIN5 (0151 MARC 141. SCCIKNI IN CAICN 4245145 S /RASA AND KruSC SMALL RC MIST K RCPL4C(D WORM 04 KACKS W I[NC 4231' Or If 151 POND NAINT D DCRRTS r. VIONIN Oe INSMC IION (NO STANDING AN ARC P4R1 Or NO RC(0(2NG Srrd CROV[ S0RIS I. N MC0C0 WINS Cr 01SCOKRY IID1N, AM• C2CCSS NOV(0 ALL K1 (( C( SPOSC7 Orr SIIC. SILL ? rCM NRCN LY112511TO SCOINCNI LOW RCNOVING Kt S(ONCNI N, RCP4I0 ANY (ROSION LANU(K (LLNIIMIC R(CULAR MCRAI/ION Or 0CN1(5II0I 34814 0(40 STONI6C 4R,51 61 OLR(NG CNr1RE SILL KASLw0t CRA SO INC. RCPAIRCO I. «[1410 Or KO41KD ALL 4PPRDVr 3(0123(0 K Su. PROPOSE 44.41410 MOOR( ST CI- COO//Sr. S, Fr S 6OVCRNIA6 SODA T(CPA ICS AK ICRIALS. KI K Clrr. A PeRael K VCRI4ICD INC C I C COSI AND 11 S L 1 RCS, ID 0(041 TIC LOCAIWM Or S SYSIEN 1- 600 -R5P -1166 2(100 SNAIL INSPECT INC IB0 rLLOVING ANY S OF CROSI0N AND R DANGCO AKAS SMALL SI.LLI MAINIAIN viol ICI ARABLE RAINFALL LVCNIS AS SMALL K (24051ICO USING OrIPLACCNCNI AND ICSII4G AS CIr1C412OVf Or INC C111 AND NI Or IRANSPORIAIIOL ALL R15111 Y MID INSIALLCD USING PLACCKN! AND 1CSf2IG AS 11 U11Ll TIES SHAW ON FMS IN AND LOCATION AND 1151 2IR1KN, DIKR 01ILIIICS NAY SIRILII3 Or Or CONTRACTOR GO°NCR SIAIC 0NC CALL (041[ Or O DIIITI[S .• TALL[ CP OIWW,tl(S DIM •nsu56•••• .ww Sans •••• • w:P. R•,n 0= .r w N 0.5..134 DISA.R. C.+•114 194=w •• u =7.4108 wK 1l, 1D1) It•tt 10.411A• Dr ( RIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS SK[TCAT14* «6(IN[CC 3610 3,33 Kv4SC6 3- 75.7000 me." 350110 3133C m T.= PM, 103r MO.. 1•12. Alur .a rMI1NRr KIM L LC Rr r.Rlcp°' Ruw� rto. 'I 1.13 NOW LKfm le•ITMILIML LW MO Id= *NI R• 0,.159v MK PiAn own - POSY NY n.PIMN 113 AI 7. AVM. NN AMA Pr AIfs MC NM III Rom FON N -RANG WIC eMa PP POSE :N ?Ai 02 MA A,R DADADI :ir Naa PEON ID nALaKNr Or Mr =ro rAS,cA _ TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE Ter M —•.r NRTIM70 AREA PLAN71h0 DETAIL Sd <7ANN •f • 4..641 S>—L t'Ss •Isofels bra ..leso ADD DMA yorrarrasar •L=4NN. w�4. Ow non, gmalor wont •01 ADD AA OM* DADA tento ma WOOD. PADA so-cap ammo .NMN(w. G1Y SnN. /6'c' 911 ILNCC 6- 40410024 T I/2" C1CAR AG(FCOAIC 2 BCN4 • 50I rCNCC 'ADDITIONAL AGGREGATE PILE TO BE KEPT ON SITE TO REFRESHEN ENTRANCE AFTER SOILING GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WITH BERM AND SILT FENCE NOT TO SCALE BUILDING PAD LEGEND 90B.0 PIPPPLLPFf 0018 90W0 GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATON FULL WALK OUT/FULL LOOK OUT/FULL BASEMENT LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION LOWEST OPENING ELEVAnON NOTE: now 0OWN Or Os' 15 DRAWN N ALL STREET AREAS *cusrON LOT TO WRE5ER4E EXISTING TREES (SEE TREE PLAN) J 045' oCi,9 L'N at / kJ r / 903 INFILTRATION AREA R£OUIRED AREA= 0.3J ACRE DESIGN AREA= 054 ACRE / NWL HWL =896 0 INFIC TRATION AREA AC SS (PENDING COUNTY APMR* VAL)v RAY Or CASING 11(Y -0 5' IRON PRoPO 00 BONOV Cr RASH -8055 6, 0 •Sfi 505 (04 WN 44(4 OCIA4 75-60 NI1 0. CASINO e INFILTRATION BASIN NO SCALE SECO 0ARH„ O E V. 8 POND ACCESS (PENDING COUNTY APPROV TOP OF BERM = 89a RIPRAP (SEE PLANS FOR OUANDTI£S) DAPIDAD 0057•AIIw (4004[1 024(1426* .5' 4*024 1m A NM ILLENA IO -� r(5) RNs POND 1 OUTLET DEVICE NOT TO SCALE .3 21 `^ r S' WY*. KW 0110 41. mI NN •1••••2143 SAM must. r mr 7y, s• G&W 3 eiamirrall amp 004000 LRAMKA. RAr. II NOe: IAN IA.I Ma = COAI*C mn(A NOM RC VW" S., • =Waal P•M M •N•=O TYPICAL STREET SECTION N01 TO SCALE app OLN A(YM 1 OR(t4p ORCCILON WNW"' Plow 'I II tibia/. NOM DEPIPPNG I /aR COM4NA4(00 Ana FABRIC N MC 4[511 tow NOG (WIC; 57014 30515 RIM rc TINES OR NOM POSTS PIP STARES 'AMC FABRIC 44040(140 IROICH FAIRED NASAL sot 6 WCR LW. STANDARD INSTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE Nor m SCATS ) (V' COY 1 1) 1j L CONS %R( y °TON -EN INAN•:l ,27 rA21. `1t ON 1 NWL =895.0 HWL =897.2 10:1 BENCH FROM 894.0 -895.0 REWIRED 5E044. VOL, =0.68 ACRE--"FT DESIGN SEDIM. VOL.= •' ENIPEET''L; DON •,7�Ot _ _ �•L BEGIN STREET-- CONSTRUCTION STA1 +68 Afki\NN ii,P.W00140 tiVi rS10,_ � e P�`6�I p et �' C .11�� ;i isrdr o ►si rig „mono, "` . raCAvAi Wow. A YRIMOVA macrmionvv VIL ALLY. VG ?, �r�iitu�I�1 c�l>l�A`1, =male wok WIGYA •rl 1\._ !RECT. RUNOFF FROM MPERNOUS TO PERVIDE%S R A WA RRWN P 0 120 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 60 FEET (22' X 34- SHEET) 1 INCH = (20 FffT (11" X 17' SHEET) ETa r,\ t•, INEATICN BY NRONMENTAL SERVICES w'1 - n AlRe mum Exposure Duration ' ten Area is not being actively worked with in 200 lineal feet of Mershon Lake is 7 doys. Area must be stabilized w/ Category 111 Wood Fiber Bloke( within that time. CONSERVATION POSTS TO BE PLACED O INTERSECTION OIL PROP. LINE AND ONSERVA IION -DAL EASEMENT (TIP.) (SEE DETAIL) ■I ter f -PAP RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT STORMWATER FACILITIES (T0 9E RECORDED M A DECARAncm TOR NANTENACti (REAR YARD DRAINAGE SWALE ODETENTION AND SEDIMENTATION POND ® REAR YARD INFILTRATION AREA - ® STORM SEWER PIPE EASEMENT IN O1,„. i. Oy ur • • • • • 1' , L X_ K ` 1 4 2005 =N.. 0 © WE AND AREA EA EVENT ISTORM SEWER PIPE EASEMENT 0 I/4 %// W se MARSHAN MEADOWS PRELIMINARY GRADING LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 9 8 a 1,3 J SIGNIFICANT TREES POINT NUMBER 214 216 217 218 219 E 270 1 221 222 223 224 225 226 231 232 234 235 237 242 243 245 249 263 267 296 301 302 303 304 305 306 318 328 330 344 351 355 356 357 360 362 363 364 365 366 368 369 425 426 462 464 465 467 469 470 471 475 476 477 478 479 480 483 484 485 487 488 489 732 807 810 819 827 828 840 841 843 844 845 846 850 DESCRIPTION ELEVATION T 10 -2 903 1588 T 10 -2 907 2219 T -12 902 6916 T•12 903 4016 T 1? ..1■1? 3;72 r lit 91)^ 0,)712. T -10 903:4156 T.10 904 018? T 10 904 9:117 T 10 904 •l6.) r 10 :104 7327 T.10 905 3099 T -10 903 9633 T 10 904 0195 7-•10 903 1206 T.10 903 6978 T -10 904 073' 1 -10 904 4642 T -10 904 8378 T -10 905 1145 7 -10 905 479 T -08 904.9866 T -08 905 1147 T -08 903 197 T -08 905.4813 T -08 905 708 T -08 905 6255 T -08 905 2878 T -08 905 3265 T -08 905.6023 T -08 905.2384 T -06 904.0657 T -06 904 8766 T -06 904.532 PO -12 904 5087 S -06 903.9609 S -06 903 5906 S -06 904.0656 S -12 903.6791 S -16 904 1682 T -06 903.6014 T -06 903.3057 T -06 903.2196 T -06 903.48 T -06 902.9368 T -06 902.8336 P -10 900.7856 P -10 900.7846 P -06 900.1622 P -06 899.1687 P -06 898.4644 P -06 897.6002 P -08 895.9291 P -08 895.3323 P -08 897.128 P -08 898.2622 P -06 896.7227 P -06 896.9177 CW -26 897.3701 CW -28 897.6405 CW -28 898.0196 CW -32 900.279 CW -34 899.6801 CW -36 899.8086 CW-40 899.5289 CW -40 899.4406 CW-44 896.7895 81 -12 886.0152 A -06 889.5755 2 -A 889.8996 1 -ERC 893.124 1 -S 895.5891 - 1 -W 897.1743 14 -A 902.4847 14 -P 902.4033 15 -M 902.2497 15 -P 902.1197 13 -A 901.9945 13 -P 902.4068 11 -A 902.8114 TREE LEGEND SIGNIFICANT TREES (AS DESIGNATED BY KJOLHAUC ENV. SERV.) NON - SIGNIFICANT TREES ' 3 SIGNIFICANT rRE£S TO BE REMOVED - - - - -1 (SEE LEFT FOR CORRESPONDING TABLE) TREE DESCRIPTION /QUANTITIES NUMBER OF SIGNIFICANT TREES 80 NUMBER OF SIGNIFICANT TREES SAVED 44 NUMBER OF TOTAL TREES ON 517E 428 NUMBER OF TOTAL TREES SAVED 313 TREE DISCRIPTION LEGEND CW = COTTONWOOD P = PINE BI = BIRCH PO = POPLAR E - ELM S = SPRUCE 1' = UNKNOWN SPECIES PROPOSED TREES OUAN. SIZE SYMBOL COMMON NAME 29 6' B -B BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' B -B RED PINE i A}.::,1530 2 r`',' FU TURF THROUGH 5 TREE T SIGN /x34 70 ENTRY IDENTIFICATION SIGN (SEE DE TAIL) 4 _ 465 4 471 47• /4zi 7 ✓ 6✓- 6g 478 477 ,426 SIL TFEIYL'E DELI A TES C TREE PRES£RVA /ON SOU 4 120 SCALE IN FEET 1 /NCH . 60 FEET (22- x 34 SHEET) 7 INCH = 720 FEET (11" x 77" SHEET) !N€TLANO D IN/ MON D ��KJOLHAUG NRONEA T EN BY TAL SERVICES , ' 10/19/04 ° \) 2 Q 11 58 NO CUTTING OF VEGETATION AT CONSERVATION EASEMENT OUTLOT A 1515---- X5'68 } - sF 11 12 FU -E THROUGH SIRE -T SIGN LINO LAKES SEED SPECS L NYtlandAnn Saad Sits Thom woos! high .a4rtoh/ahwf -,Mar Mb, /.when): .: In1461000.(11.•.. -10*4 nN o.r.r.1 • q.r=...r/ 00000 .l.0rl.•.w.a..0 a.wa.•(awrl.ry r..k fnar w- 1righhay 00000•0/ n.1Yn+la.1..1..•a I1. Owl olp∎•• Mrv....M ▪ nr►.r+...ar..W 0vawrr4.0..w. -r••V 15l.aywa.Ola te' ...+•rlr..r -I 0. rw.r. ,000,0 .....015 00.0•.00 w .16....0.1.1,. 00...+.0 116 ikar00.0.0 ( 0.01•60000800 41100.10 010 ea Vam.0108.41 4' w11000+.r04+0000-0+101 ISM rrO0 ea. Mr00.0.1 IN Cs* kft•000.000.01■0•10000 OS ATM. 000 105000400 Mama .Rl...wM.apaO X 1f ,•••0015.. pr000 4'.....10 00151••+.0,00..... /1....y o ... 'soot sumo ..10 ..nbww .0 M rotor. roorapoorryV otoommattst000 woo.) 1111►..Y afar /.6....w r..00.y 1151artpro0150/l' orona.1. afar...V ▪ 00■1060l'1w0 .aa *0.000 n 00....010.001 /1006000r0) 1.Y 10•0/000000 10,01.000000 ZS rr.... rue (7a...••.P.••I K Y.•.. 11000...•.06 ▪ impf n m.arey t Nook Nixfostar transition YSaatforann &Moon 1 -.1wr hlphaaf roar Moot 1n top of nandk A gam: an mow.. (A..r..■...o rn 000 r.- 00000... 0010•01010 ,r Comb .r Oyes 00..MrM ant1..a1....fa...Mr... -.y ass..., +fampa mere) AIM. .M1Yr A.• aYM /.rla.•010...1a.+00 MS "avow M00w..s.+0 4iq /..* M.•.+s.w -..Y M...ylur I119....r a.... a.lg 10 .00.- I0WY• -.V as I,..•. -r M.00a..a.+r.ry a >SES11: Is 0•wm l..ar..a6..Y - '4rr.M•.V.r -ly. name may 1.04.0044r0 n-1 - -00...d nA-- -aa..00a.r1 Isdorm.. postamoomo4 s tan.amp - asu00.ar.ti.1....1 UM a•wrs_on (6' ' __ - ▪ n..a...IM...Ir.Mrrwl 4. Womwaii. am. 000.0060e *MY u_.MY1010 IaaN.V•/•MY.r. ✓ /Ir.•IMmW...V USD* r -• /ar..6MW n 110. 14.1 ....M...ra•.•.+..1 00∎40/ rP06~.) a..41∎∎•• P11100 Alaimo 0.1010 n10 1.f_ (A..0.0..0 1111.0000 0001 n.. 040•010000r.a0 001. 040001 ...r0..sv/ 1101010 0o 00_ 040■100110 Maw.) 4' 000 0 0.010000 4,.....00,040. **00001 00 0.. 61 a. oMr M.lr..• 00..0..0 n aal..rr4M.•4014/ nr0wr...■m.....0 4' rMI.M.rA.+.a.o*o4 4' ara,* (a..•.allrl 110161.00 ... da.(n.r #0•000.0 Map... /r.M. (�a...Yww -15...1 M10M•....a�• IA...I•pY aM.0.001.r0.r....+4 .s W.1ar.rM•.4•001.1.r•/ 4' M..ra nowy,..rMrrpryn.. ..w••M15.....1.J 4'a.1.....n..(201.4rN N.ry..r Up40dArt S..d Yfr(uplood moo surrounding top of pmld. and W/I10I 0p4lld a11NIf: Saadilg MOO. O�at. ON11 .1500 MM. Ill. • Asa 4.ln00000 awe ar ort:►MY RAY.. .Yl.ra Npow . 11'4 arrm..c Raeomm.nd dSaaM14g Dolor 1...- 1000.0.150 .yr M E MAR 1 4 2005 CITY OF UUNC LAKES MARSHAN MEADOWS LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA a a 71 • • • r.. x[0.0,0 uK0..13.15 •pr AVM •xrx• OA4 iC11r wa.u. o 1 v\^ �rV 0 _ i — 4 1 S iR W80My I.4 MWwa0 P� Ck oaf mW1.■004 POSTS m If Fuca nxeMc0 -a MOP. wr uo Err Orinal4r(Mt (I11,) OUTLOT A P7Z AVA FORSHAM LAKE DRIVE STAGE COACH TRAIL 0 t00 200 SCALE IN FEET 7 INCH w 700 FEET (22" X 34" SHEET) 7 INCH 200 FEET (77` X 77" SHEET) RECEIVED MAR 1 4 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES MARSHAN MEADOWS LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA f1 • • • AGENDA ITEM VI. B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: April 13, 2005 TOPIC: Temporary Signage BACKGROUND A number of business owners attended the March 9 meeting and expressed some concerns regarding the regulation of signage. The P & Z asked that the business owners get together and present their preferences for the regulation of temporary signs. We received two sets of proposals. Both are attached. The P & Z had reached agreement on requirements for banners and portable signs (see attached). The two proposals received from separate business owners differ from these requirements. The P & Z will need to decide if it wants to reconsider the requirements for banners and portable signs. The P & Z agreed to recommend no regulation of window signs. There are other forms of temporary signage to address. These include pennants and the miscellaneous inexpensive cardboard and plastic signs often seen at retail businesses in the city. Signs in County Rights of Way: Staff contacted the Anoka County Highway Dept. to discuss the possibility of metal signs advertising several businesses, like the ones seen on freeways. Anoka County does not have such a sign program. The topic has come up and the County specifically decided not to pursue such a program. Even if the City were to request this type of signs, it is the County's policy not to allow them in County rights of way. The County does allow signs for public uses such as parks and public buildings, but not for advertising for private businesses. The only exception has been when access to a business is cut off by a County road project. Then, a sign might be put upgiving direction to the new access such as a frontage road. RECOMMENDATION Review the signage proposals submitted by business owners. • • Result of P & Z Discussion of November 2004 BANNER Definition A temporary sign made of cloth, flexible plastic, or other fabric Maximum Size: 32 square feet Attachment: All four corners must be attached to the principal building on site Permit: Portable Sign and Banner permits are held to the following standards: 1. One portable sign or banner is allowed per permit 2. One permit is allowed per quarter of any calendar year 3. Permit is good for 17 consecutive days 4. Permit period always begins on a Friday 5. Double permit fees will be assessed if the permit is pulled after the sign is placed 6. The City has the right to remove the sign at the end of the permit period and collect the cost of removal from the permit holder and/or property owner. Fee: $25 per permit. PORTABLE SIGN Definition A temporary sign designed to be moved from one location to another Maximum Size: 32 square feet Setback: Five feet from any property line Permit: Portable Sign and Banner permits are held to the following standards: 1. One portable sign or banner is allowed per permit 2. One permit is allowed per quarter of any calendar year 3. Permit is good for 17 consecutive days 4. Permit period always begins on a Friday 5. Double permit fees will be assessed if the permit is pulled after the sign is placed 6. The City has the right to remove the sign at the end of the permit period and collect the cost of removal from the permit holder and /or property owner. • Fee: $25 per permit. • Proposal to Planning & Zoning Board Banner Definition: Maximum Size: Attachment: Permit: Fee: • A temporary sign made of cloth, flexible plastic, or other fabric 40 square feet All four corners must be attached to a permanent structure on premise. Banner permits are held to the following standards: 1. Up to 3 banners allowed per permit 2. One permit per month 3. Permit is good for the length of the month 4. Permit period always runs from the first of the month thru the last day of the month 5. Double permit fees will be assessed if the permit is pulled after the banner is placed. A sliding scale of punitive actions will follow with any further violatons, ending with privileges being revoked. 6. The city has the right to remove the banner after the permit has expired and collect the cost of removal from the permit holder and /or property owner. *Business owners within in a mall would have 3 banners per mall and would determine from within who gets to apply for the permit each month. Option 1: $25.00 per permit Option 2: $250.00 for full year of permits (Reduce administrative work) Portable Sign Definition: another Maximum Size: Setback: Permit: • Fee: • A temporary sign designed to be moved from one location to 40 Square feet Five feet from any property line Portable signs permits are held to the following standards: 1. Up to 3 portable signs allowed per permit 2. One permit per month 3. Permit is good for the length of the month 4. Permit period always runs from the first of the month thru the last day of the month 5. Double permit fees will be assessed if the permit is pulled after the sign is placed A sliding scale of punitive actions will follow with any further violatons, ending with privileges being revoked. 6. The city has the right to remove the sign after the permit has expired and collect the cost of removal from the permit holder and /or property owner. *Business owners within in a mall would have 3 signs per mall and would determine from within who gets to apply for the permit each month. Option 1: $25.00 per permit Option 2: $250.00 for full year of permits (Reduce administrative work) • • Other Suggestions: One Day Signage Main purpose would be to advertise a special. City approved sign would be placed out in the moming and removed at the end of business that same day. One sign per business with a limit for malls. No permit required. Metal Signs Help many businessess reduce signage by installing metal signage with the names of businesses with an arrow indicating where the business is located. (Le. Chomoniz golf course) Garage sale signs City or private company rents garage sale signs that are approved by the city. Individuals place a deposit on the signage. Individual receives deposit back when signs are returned minus rental fee and if any damage a fee for that also. Community Boards Place community boards at a few key locations throughout Lino Lakes. Rent space on these community boards to local business owners, local organizations, etc. on a monthly basis. Builder /Realitor /Developors There needs to be requirements for this industry just like all other local businesses. They should follow the requirements listed above. The use of issuing building permits could help with the enforcement of the requirements. Violators could have permits pulled, face fines, or some other punitive actions. • • • April 1, 2005 Mr. Jeff Smyser City Planer 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Proposal for Banners, Temporary Signage Dear Mr. Smyser, Enclosed please find our proposal to the Planning & Zoning Board regarding the use of banners, temporary signs and/or signage throughout Lino Lakes. There are several of us who would like to offer an alternative proposal than the some of the other proposals you may have received since the last Planning & Zoning Board meeting. This proposal would entail new businesses only as we feel the main purpose of temporary signage is to help us get our businesses up and running. Please take a look at the attached proposal and if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at 651- 490 -0100. Thank you, in advance, for your help in this matter. Enclosures SIGNAGE PROPOSAL RECEVED APR 0 1 20n5 CITY OF LINO LAKES The main purpose for any local business to use banners and/or temporary signs is o attention to their business in order to draw new customers. This is especially difficult when you are a new, independently owned, start-up business and are literally starting with NO clients at all. Sometimes, additional signage can literally mean paying the bills or losing not only your business, but everything you have used as collateral (i.e., house, car, pensions, etc.). The majority of your new owners, unfortunately, are in this category. We believe if the Planning & Zoning Committee /CityCouncil would give new businesses some help to get us established we would become a vital asset to our "bedroom community" of Lino Lakes. Therefore, we would like to present some ideas and/or thoughts for a one year proposal for new businesses opening up in the Lino Lakes area. 1) Help from the City Council to get metal signs (i.e., Chominix, McDonalds, etc.) in 2 locations indicating the name of each store in the mall with an arrow showing direction and distance to the mall. Size and shape approved by the City of Lino Lakes (see Exhibit A). OR 2) Rent space from an individual landowner to install a City approved sign (see Exhibit B). OR 3) Temporary sign (approved by City) to be placed in up to 3 locations 1 day per week to advertise specials. Permit to be required at the date of opening to remain in existence for 1 year (see Exhibit C). AND /OR 4) Present new businesses opening up in the Lino Lakes area on the City cable television for a period of time (to be determined). AND /OR 5) Present new businesses in any /all City newspapers, announcements, etc. Again, this is a one -year proposal for new, independently owned businesses to help us get started. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Katie Allen at 651 -490- 0100 or Jim Szyplinski at 651 -481 -1000.