Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/14/2005 P&Z Packet
• • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, September 14, 2005 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 10, 2005 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Apollo Landing, Equinox Development LLP, 540 Lilac Street — Paul Bengtson B. Rezone to R -1 and GB, Preliminary Plat and MUSA Allocation, Pine Glen, 7930 Lake Drive — Paul Bengtson (Public Hearing was closed and item was tabled on 8/10/05) C. PUBLIC HEARING to Amend the Planned Unit Development for Legacy at Woods Edge to include a hotel as a permitted use — Paul Bengtson D. PUBLIC HEARING to Amend the Planned Unit Development for Legacy at Woods Edge to include signage criteria — Paul Bengtson E. Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Legacy at Woods Edge — Paul Bengtson 1. Site Plan Review for Legacy Hotel 2. PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for outdoor dining, and a Site Plan Review, for Betty's Pies Restaurant 3. Site Plan Review for Lakewood Apartments 4. Final Plat for Village No. 4 F. PUBLIC HEARING for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Village of Hardwood Creek — Jeff Smyser VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Requiring sidewalks in subdivisions B. AUAR Update C. Meeting Rules VII. ADJOURN • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT : August 10, 2005 . 6:32 P.M. : 10:18 P.M. : Hyden (arrived at 6:50 p.m.), Laden, Nelson, Pogalz, Rafferty, Root, and Tralle. : None. : Jeff Smyser; Michael Grochala; James Studenski; and Paul Bengtson I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Rafferty called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:32 p.m., August 10, 2005. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 13, 2005 Mr. Tralle made a MOTION approve the July 13, 2005 Minutes and was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 5 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Rafferty declared open mike open at 6:64 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:35 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 5 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING for Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., 6776 Lake Drive DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 2 Staff stated applicant had requested approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat for property located adjacent to the northeast corner of Lake Drive and Hodgson Road. The applicant has already obtained Site and Building Plan Review approval administratively on July 18, 2005; executed a performance agreement for the site; and has pulled building permits for construction of a 25,000 square foot multi -tenant building on the site. The applicant is now pursuing a Preliminary and Final Plat to clean up the legal descriptions and easement documentation on the subject property. The subject site was purchased from the City of Lino Lakes earlier this year. Staff presented their analysis and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed addition is subject to Anoka County Highway Department requirements, review, and approval. Mr. Pogalz asked how many stores was the building. Mr. Bengston replied it was two stories with a drive out garage on the back side of the building. Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 6:37p.m. Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Jason Rud, President of E.G. Rud & Sons, asked if there were any questions. The Commissioners had no questions. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this proposal to make comment. There were no comments made. Mr. Nelson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 6:37 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., 6776 Lake Drive, subject to the condition as noted in staff's August 10, 2005 report and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 5 -0. B. Variance to rear setback from Ordinary High Water Level to build an addition to existing house, Benton Erickson, 6868 W. Shadow Lake Drive Staff stated the Shoreland Ordinance for the City of Lino Lakes requires a 100 -foot setback from the Ordinary High Water Line for any structure that is Unsewered. The applicant is proposing an addition to the existing single family dwelling at 6868 West Shadow Lake Drive that if approved would reduce that setback to 50.6 feet. Staff presented their analysis and recommended denial of the variance. Mr. Tralle asked if W. Shadow Lake Drive was scheduled for City sewer and water at some point in the future. Mr. Bengston responded there was a referendum that would DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 3 cause the redevelopment of the street and the possibility of utilities being put in on W. Shadow Lake Drive, but it would not affect this application and Mr. Erickson would still need to obtain the variance as they would be encroaching closer than the neighboring properties. Mr. Hyden arrived at 6:50 p.m. Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Brad Erickson, 6868 W. Shadow Lake Drive, stated they were upset with the City staff and summarized the process they had followed for this variance. He indicated they were over 100 -feet from the lake. He noted they had worked closely with staff on this and had spent a lot of money for this variance and moved ahead with their plans. He stated he believed they had followed everything the City staff had directed and he was disappointed the staff was recommending denial. He indicated they had spent several thousand dollars on this, which they would not have done if they believed this would not be approved. He indicated he wanted to be treated the same as everyone else in the neighborhood. He stated he has lived in the neighborhood for 25 years and has never had any problems with flooding or water sitting in his yard. Chair Rafferty stated he believed staff was trying to help him through this variance, but unfortunately, the DNR was saying there were other ways of doing this. Mr. Erickson asked why was their neighbor allowed to build a porch. He stated he did not believe his project would affect the lake quality. He noted the City and DNR until recently did not have any interest in the lake and if anything the residents had tried to improve the quality of the lake. He noted most of the main structure was set closer to the lake than he was. Chair Rafferty stated he had looked at his site and the guidelines in place were to keep standardization and reducing a 100 -foot setback to 50 -feet, was pushing it. Mr. Erickson noted there were a lot of houses on the lake sitting on the setback and most of those houses were put in before setbacks were in place. Chair Rafferty noted the elevation for the 100 -year flood was farther up in his yard. Mr. Erickson responded his neighbors had brought in fill years ago to build up their yards, but he had no need to do that because he did not have flooding issues. Mr. Hyden asked if the 100 -foot setback would change if W. Shadow Lake Drive went on City sewer and water. Mr. Bengston replied it would be reduced to 75 -feet, but this property would still need a variance. Mr. Hyden asked if the neighboring house had gone through a similar process. Mr. Bengston replied staff had looked at this and there had been homes closer than 100 feet, but they had met the shoreline ordinance. He noted there were a couple of homes that were almost on top of the ordinary high water line that had been there for quite awhile. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 4 Mr. Nelson inquired about the other lots had been filled and the high water lot having been moved. Mr. Bengston replied the DNR had not received any permits to bring in any fill for these other properties and if this had been done the DNR would investigate as to how this was permitted. Chair Rafferty inquired about the decks on the other two adjoining lots. He asked how were these structures able to be built. Mr. Bengston responded uncovered decks and porches were allowed to encroach into setback areas and in this case the shoreline ordinance might not have been in effect when the decks /porches were built. Mr. Laden asked what the side yard set back was. Mr. Bengston replied it was ten feet. Mr. Laden asked if there was any reason why the addition could not be built to the south. Mr. Bengston replied according to setback standards, it did not appear there would be any reason why the addition could not be built there, but there might be a drainage field on that side. He indicated they would need to talk to the applicant about this. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend denial of the Variance to rear setback from Ordinary High Water Level to build an addition to existing house, Benton Erickson, 6868 W. Shadow Lake Drive based on the Findings of Fact as noted in staff's July 14, 2005 report and was supported by Mr. Root. Mr. Root noted this was a tough decision and he understood everything the applicant said and applicant's concerns, but they had to follow the rules. Mr. Nelson asked if applicant would have the opportunity to go back to the DNR because he believed applicant did have a hardship in this situation. Mr. Bengston responded applicant could contact the DNR, but noted the 100 -foot setback was a City requirement. Mr. Nelson asked if the high water line could be moved to be more equitable to the other lots. Mr. Bengston replied the only way for the line to change was if the DNR would change it by lowering the lake or allowing fill to be brought in, but he was not sure if the DNR would allow this. Mr. Nelson suggested the applicant pursue this with the DNR. Motion carried 6 -0. C. Final Plat for Foxborough, Royal Oaks Realty, a 50 -acre development south of Birch Street and east of Deerwood Lane, at the east end of Fox Road Staff stated the developer has changed the name of this project from Fox Den Acres to Foxborough. The City Council approved the preliminary plat for the Fox Den Acres planned unit development on January 10, 2005 with Resolution 04 -196. This project is the first to implement the new parks and open space plan through the use of a conservation development. The conservation development approach, while often discussed in Lino Lakes in the past, has not previously been pursued to the extent being seen on this project. DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 5 Staff noted the total site is 50 acres and the permanent open space will include 28 acres, about 56 %. The preservation of open space on this site will be an important step in the implementation of the community's greenway vision. An overall conservation plan will lay out what actions must occur to conserve and restore specified natural features of the site. The homeowners association will prepare an annual implementation plan. The City will review each annual implementation plan to make sure it is consistent with the overall conservation plan. The City then will release funds for the activities described in the annual plan. Staff presented their analysis and recommended approval. Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, thanked staff for their work on this. He summarized the development for the Board. Chair Rafferty asked if there would be a homeowners association. Mr. Black replied that was correct. Mr. Laden, made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Final Plat for Foxborough, Royal Oaks Realty, a 50 -acre development south of Birch Street and east of Deerwood Lane, at the east end of Fox Road and was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 6 -0. D. PUBLIC HEARING for a Rezone to R -1 and GB, Preliminary Plat and MUSA Allocation, Pine Glen, 7930 Lake Drive Staff stated applicant has requested approval of a 78 -lot single - family residential and 2 lot commercial subdivision entitled Pine Glen. The subject property is located on the east side of Lake Drive approximately 900 feet south of Main Street. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density sewered residential use and it is currently zoned R -1X (Single Family Executive), R (Rural), and GB (General Business). Staff indicated the applicant's request includes a Rezoning to R -1 (Single Family Residential) and GB (General Business); 44.78 acres of MUSA allocation; and a preliminary plat for the 78 residential and 2 commercial lots. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on Thursday, July 28th, giving notice to neighbors using mailing labels supplied by the City of Lino Lakes Community Development Department. Staff presented their analysis and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Phase 1 of the project including 42 residential lots cannot be final platted until 2006. The final plat for phase 2 of the project including 38 residential lots cannot be final platted until 2007. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 6 2. A sign must be provided at the northern terminus of Street C and the southern terminus of Street B that indicate that the road is intended to continue in the future. 3. Homeowner's Association documentation must be submitted with the final plat application. 4. Park dedication fees must be paid in accordance with the city fee schedule. 5. A site and building plan review must be completed for both of the commercial lots prior to any commercial activities on those sites. 6. All existing structures must be removed prior to the approval of a final plat for any portion of Phase 1. 7. 4.08 acres of commercial MUSA is hereby allocated to the commercial portion of the site. 8. 20.7 acres of residential MUSA for the year 2006, and 20 acres of residential MUSA for the year 2007 are hereby allocated to the residential portion of the site. 9. City native seed mix must be used in all drainage ponds and wet areas and a 3 -year management plan must be established with a reputable management company. 10. Right -of -way for Lake Drive shall be dedicated as 60 feet from centerline. 11. A 15 -foot wide trail easement along Lake Drive will need to be dedicated to the City prior to the City Council approving any final plat for the project. This easement will need to be outside the ultimate right -of -way width for Lake Drive. 12. A sidewalk or trail connecting the private trail system to the commercial site and ultimately to the Lake Drive trail must be built as part of the first phase of this development. 13. The project is subject to Rice Creek Watershed review and approval. 14. The project is subject to Anoka County Highway Department review and approval. 15. A temporary cul -de -sac must be provided at the southern terminus of Street C. 16. Plans depicting the integration of Street A into Lois Lane must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. 17. The upland area of all lots must be confirmed to meet the 10,800 square foot requirement prior to the preliminary plat being reviewed by the City Council. Mr. Root asked if a wood chip trail was acceptable. Mr. Bengston replied because this was not a required trail, the developer could propose any type of trail material he wanted. DRAFT MINUTES • Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 7 • He noted the trail was meant to be used by the residents of the development and the type of material they were intending on using would not impede drainage in the area. Mr. Root asked if the trail was underneath the utility lines. Mr. Bengston replied the trail would be 40 -feet north of the utility lines. Mr. Root asked why the road could not go to the north and inquired about the spacing of the intersections. Mr. Studenski responded Anoka County's requirement was 1/4 mile for any intersections for spacing. He noted staff tried to line things up for future intersections. Mr. Root asked if these distances were within 1/4 mile. Mr. Studenski replied that was correct. He indicated they were waiting for Anoka County comments at this time. Mr. Tralle stated he had an issue with Street C going up to an existing home. He asked what are the chances of that ever getting extended over to James Street. Mr. Bengston responded the intention of staff was to provide another access to potentially alleviate some of the traffic in this area, particularly the Lake Drive and Main Street extension. He stated if that would every happen, it would be up to the property owner who owned that home to sell the land for the street and he believed the developer has spoken with that property owner, but he did not know the results of that discussion. He indicated they wanted to leave this open as a possibility in the future. • Mr. Laden asked if the Street A would connect to Lois Lane. Mr. Bengston acknowledged it would connect to Lois Lane. Mr. Tralle asked what was on the back of Lot 32. Mr. Bengston replied the back end was a drainage retention pond and the developer would make sure the residents knew the purpose of those ponds. Mr. Hyden asked if Vicky Lane would be closed off. Mr. Bengston responded their intention was to realign Vicky Lane. Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this proposal to make comment. Mark Westling, 947 Lois Lane, stated the back of his property was on the other side of this proposed development. He asked if there had been a traffic analysis for the connection to Lois Lane and asked what type of a traffic increase they could expect on Lois Lane. He stated Lois Lane had no sidewalks and asked if they were increasing the amount of traffic, would sidewalks be added. He asked if there was a specific length for a cul -de -sac and why was one of the cul -de -sacs exceeding that length. He asked if the proposed trail was going to be on the developer's property, or would it be in the easement of the power line. He asked how set where they on the density. He noted they were proposing a higher density along the back of his property and asked if the lots could be increased to 100 -feet wide. He asked if it would be possible to request the City vacate the Dupont easement, which would allow him to regain the 15 -feet that was left on the DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 8 backside of his property line. He expressed concern about increasing the size of the road and asked why there were no sidewalks within the development. He noted it was difficult to go south on Lake Drive, especially on Fridays and expressed concern about this new development adding to that problem. He asked for a list of the builders from the developer, which the developer had indicated he would provide. Chair Rafferty asked everyone to keep their comments to two minutes or less. Ken Dufresne, 940 James Street, stated the area was heavily wooded and strongly recommended the City require the builder to utilize as much of the existing vegetation as possible. He indicated if they utilized this property, it would be less impact on the existing neighborhoods. He asked the builder to use some restraint as to how they cleared land. He noted this would stand very well with the neighborhood. Joann Lahlum, 931 Lois Lane, expressed concern with respect to traffic and the proposed semi -fore being put in at Lois Lane. She asked how would people access the four businesses and Public Park without doing a "U" turn or going down Lois Lane. John Humenansky, 989 Lois Lane, requested they deny the rezoning change and wait for a suitable development that incorporated the R -1 designation. He stated future plans for Lake Drive were currently unknown and traffic coming from the north would either have to make a "U" turn or go through the neighborhoods to get to the businesses, which would change the character of the neighborhood. He stated a major flaw in this plan was that there was no exit to the north. He did not believe there had been enough study on the traffic flow and they did not have enough information to pass this tonight. Brenda Talley, 963 Lois Lane, stated on Lois Lane the traffic was slow, but it was "hilly" and it was difficult to see. She expressed concern for the safety of the children in the neighborhood with these types of site lines. She expressed concern about accessing Lake Drive and the increase in traffic. She noted with additional stoplights and stop signs this increased her commute time and she was required to get to her employment within 30 minutes after she was called. She expressed concern about the density of the development. She expressed concern about the trail location and the possibility of increase in crime. She requested there be another option for the traffic. She stated she felt like they were getting squeezed out. She expressed concern about medians being put in Lake Drive. She asked if there was the possibility to shift the school zoning district because right now she had to send her children to Forest Lake. Betsy Friesen, 975 James Street, expressed concern about the traffic. She stated they needed to consider the infrastructure first and not last. She noted Street A would be an uncontrolled intersection until Vicky Lane had been addressed. She stated it was very difficult to get out onto Lake Drive, especially on Friday nights. She noted the City needed to get a handle on the traffic and plan for the future, instead of planning backwards. Kevin Kuznia, 1018 Lois Lane, proposed to keep the Lois Lane neighborhood the way it was. He noted right now traffic was minimal. He stated if people knew they could go down Lois Lane to get to another connection, it would increase traffic and safety issues. DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 9 • Trish Yotter, 874 Lois Lane, asked if there had been any consideration about the economic impact on the existing neighborhoods. Chair Rafferty requested staff address the questions asked so far. Mr. Bengston stated it was up to Anoka County as to what was going to happen with Lake Drive and the City or developer had no control over this. With respect to the traffic analysis on Lois Lane, there was not a study done on this because traffic was designed to go to the main entrance and exit point and traveling through Lois Lane was a longer route for the people to take. He stated it was not studied how many people would go through Lois Lane and this would be scientifically impossible to determine. With respect to the cul -de -sac, it was required to be no more than 500 -feet. The trail was on the developer's property, even though there was an easement in place. He stated the trail was within the tree and brush trimming area beyond the easement. With respect to the density level, this was guided by the Comprehensive Plan and this property was well below the allowable level. With respect to vacating Dupont Avenue, this was a possibility and staff would need to look at this to determine if this was the best course of action, but if there was an application made, they would look at this. He noted no sidewalks were being proposed or required for this development. With respect to the existing trees on the site, the developer had indicated they would try and preserve as many trees as possible as this would increase the properties values, but it might not be possible to save all of the trees they would like to because of grading issues. He noted until they staked the properties, they would not know how many trees they would be able to preserve. With respect to the density, this was a low density residential and they were within and below those density levels. With respect to the north exit, Street C was set up to connect in the future, but as the developer did not own the property to the north, it was impossible to require the developer to provide this access. He stated it was their intent to provide as many access points as possible due to emergency services being able to access the area. He noted the Lois Lane access would provide a secondary access into the area, as well as providing another access onto Lois Lane. Chair Rafferty invited applicant to make comment. Larry Olson, LSJ Engineering, stated they would put a list of builders together that they would provide to staff He noted this would probably not be a final list as the list of builders was usually not prepared as a part of the preliminary plat process, but this list would give a good representation of what they were proposing. He noted this plan had gone before staff for some time and initially this was going to be townhomes. He noted they had some size constraints, which did not allow them to be very creative. Mr. Laden asked if they would be open to the possibility of providing a sidewalk through Street A. Mr. Olson replied he would bring this up to the developer (23 LLC) for consideration. Mr. Tralle asked if there were any other developments 23 LLC has done anywhere else. Mr. Olson responded this was the first development for 23 LLC, but some of the partners in 23 LLC were also the partners for Clearwater Creek. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 10 Chair Rafferty stated it would have been nice if they would have presented options at the neighborhood meeting. Mr. Olson stated he was not at the neighborhood meeting, so he did not know what was presented. Quinn Bergman, 990 Lois Lane, he asked the Board to addressed the fact that there were no plans to improve Lake Drive and to take into consider the amount of traffic increase. He stated it was an inconvenience for him to get into his neighborhood at this time and did not believe people would not use Lois Lane as an access. He asked the Board to not approve this until a decision was made about Lake Drive. He indicated this was already a high density area with respect to traffic. Tom Weirns, 1015 Lois Lane, stated he had bought his land 22 years ago and he lived there because he wanted to not because he had to. He realized this had to be developed and requested this be developed properly with nice size home and lots and to leave Lois Lane the way it was and to not connect Lois Lane to this development. He stated he wanted to preserve what he had. He asked them to keep the two neighborhoods completely separate. Ray Radtke, 860 James Street, stated James Street also had a lot of traffic going down it on a Friday night. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:48 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Hyden asked if this was currently zoned R1X. Mr. Smyser explained the zoning in this area, noting it was zoned RX and Rural. Mr. Root stated he believed there were some open issues including traffic. He requested an analysis at both Lois Lane the way it sits now and with the proposed Street A. He asked for the traffic counts at peak time. He stated until they understood better what Anoka County was going to do with the intersection and Lake Drive, he was not sure he could vote on this tonight. He noted the developer was also not in attendance and he had some questions for the developer such as having all of the properties complying with the R1X zoning. He stated he also wanted to know if the developer would be willing to install sidewalks. He indicated because of these open issues, he wanted to see these answered first prior to voting. Mr. Bengston stated they had done a traffic study and he would provide this to the Board members. He noted there was no scientific basis for determining how many people would use Lois Lane as an access. He noted the traffic study had been reviewed by the City Engineer and they had approved this. Mr. Root stated he wanted to see the details of the traffic counts, the peak times, and the Lois Lane traffic also, as well as James Street and Vicky Street. Mr. Bengston responded he would get them copies to review. DRAFT MINUTES • Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 11 • Chair Rafferty stated he believed it would be inappropriate to approve this tonight until he had a better understanding as to what was going on with Lake Drive. Mr. Tralle noted he lived on the north side of the City and he knew about the traffic problems in this area. He indicated every Friday night he fights the traffic and the only way they were going to alleviate this problem was for the residents to "bug" Anoka County about putting in a stop light at Lake Drive and Main Street. He stated connecting Lois Lane and Street A was important to keep traffic flowing and allow emergency access and as P & Z members, they needed to make sure they did not create pockets where there was insufficient access. He stated he could not approve this tonight because of the unanswered questions. Mr. Nelson agreed with Mr. Tralle to not dead end Lois Lane. He recommended Lois Lane be connected to Street A. He requested staff follow up with Anoka County as to their plans for Lake Drive and would they line up Vicky Lane as a part of this development. He stated he did not know how requiring sidewalks in this new development would improve the traffic or pedestrian traffic on Lois Lane. Mr. Pogalz stated he also agreed with the previous comments made. He noted traffic studies were difficult to understand and did not always make sense. He indicated these studies were not the perfect answer, but to not connect Street A to Lois Lane would be a huge mistake and they needed to have this access. He stated he understood their concerns about the additional traffic and the safety of their children, but the developer had the right to develop his property. He noted the proposed density was pretty good considering they were originally going to propose a townhouse development. He agreed this development had a ways to go from his point and they were doing the best they could with their options. He stated they were not going to vote for this tonight and the developer had to show up to answer their questions. He stated the Board would do everything they could for the existing neighborhood. Mr. Hyden stated he would like to see this development be more harmonious with the existing neighborhood, which meant having bigger lots and fewer homes. He noted development was inevitable, but they needed to plan a good development. He indicated there were things about this development that were very good, but they had a ways to go. He stated infrastructure would not happen until it got bad. He believed Anoka County did not have any plans until they saw that things were really bad and it would take a lot of public pressure on the County Commissioners to get anything done. He noted this was unfortunate, but that was the way the system worked. Mr. Pogalz asked what was the timeline on this application. Mr. Bengston replied the application came in July, 2005 and they had 120 -days to make a decision, so tabling this would not be an issue. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to table the Rezone to R -1 and GB, Preliminary Plat and MUSA Allocation, Pine Glen, 7930 Lake Drive and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. Chair Rafferty recessed the meeting at 9:13 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:22 p.m. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 12 E. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING to Amend Sign Ordinance text to address temporary signage and additional wall signs Chair Rafferty continued the public hearing at 9:23 p.m. Staff stated the Planning & Zoning opened the public hearing for the sign ordinance amendments at the July 13 meeting. The discussion raised a number of questions. Staff has reviewed the draft ordinance and made revisions. The Boardmembers reviewed the revisions and made various comments and suggestions. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this proposal to make comment. There were no comments made. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 9:46 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend approving the amended Sign Ordinance text to address temporary signage and additional walls signs with the changes made and forward this onto City Council and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. F. PUBLIC HEARING to Amend the Zoning Ordinance to address metal panels on commercial buildings Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 9:49 p.m. Staff stated the zoning ordinance includes requirements for exterior building material. The existing text imposes only minimal restrictions on building materials for commercial, industrial, and institutional buildings. The community standards regarding the quality of buildings have changed over time. Specifically, metal - skinned buildings that are or resemble pole barns no longer are acceptable. This type of construction is appropriate for agricultural uses or storage in rural areas. It is not acceptable for new commercial, industrial, or institutional structures. Staff recommended approving the proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance. Mr. Root stated he believed this was too restrictive in an industrial park area. Chair Rafferty asked if the metal was not structural, but it was allowable to add metal to the outside of an existing wall. Mr. Smyser replied that was correct. Mr. Root asked if two pieces of metal would be allowed. Mr. Smyser stated if it looked like a pole barn, it would not be allowed, even if they put something "pretty" on the outside. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this proposal to make comment. DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 13 • There were no public comments made. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 10:00 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Root stated he agreed with having no metal pole barns, but he believed they were being too restrictive, which would discourage businesses from coming into the City and he would be voting against this. Mr. Laden asked if this was eliminating pole barns throughout the City. Mr. Smyser replied this would only eliminate pole barns in industrial, commercial, and institutional buildings. He indicated private residences would still be allowed to construct pole barns as long as they followed the current ordinances. Chair Rafferty stated he did not believe the City had enough land left to worry about this, but he appreciated staff was trying to address this. Mr. Laden asked if decorative metal panels were allowed. Mr. Smyser replied they were. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend amending the Zoning Ordinance to address metal panels on commercial buildings and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -1 (Mr. Root opposed). VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. VILLAGE OF HARDWOOD CREEK DEVELOPMENT UPDATE (I -35E CORRIDOR) & SCHEDULE SPECIAL MEETING DATE Staff stated it is likely they will receive an application to amend the comprehensive plan to provide for the development of 360 acres in the I -35E corridor. This project will be large and somewhat complex. Staff anticipates it will be necessary to hold an additional, special P &Z meeting devoted exclusively to this project. The application likely will be considered at the normal September 14 meeting. Staff is requesting the P &Z members consider a special meeting on Tuesday, September 27. Mr. Laden stated he could not make the September 27 meeting, but he would be in attendance at the regular meeting. B. REQUIRING SIDEWALKS IN SUBDIVISIONS Mr. Root suggested they postpone this to a future meeting. C. AUAR UPDATE Mr. Smyser gave an AUAR update to the Board. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board August 10, 2005 Page 14 D. MEETING RULES Staff stated at the last meeting, the question arose regarding adopting rules of conduct for public hearing. Staff contacted the City of Hugo and received information. These rules are presented as information for consideration only. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 10:18 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Root. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. DRAFT MINUTES • • AGENDA ITEM V.A. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: September 14, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plan Apollo Landing BACKGROUND Equinox Development was previously approved by the City Council (in the form of a Development Stage Plan) for a 5 lot commercial subdivision on property located at 540 Lilac Drive. The application included a Rezoning to GB (General Business), a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Planned Unit Development, a Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and allocation of commercial MUSA reserve. The developer has now applied for a final plan for the hotel that is proposed for lot 1 of the plat. The final plan application includes the final building plans for the hotel as well as the final plat for the site. The development will also includes a restaurant pad on lot 5, and retail /commercial pads on lots 2, 3, and 4. Those lots will be designated as outlots on the final plat and will be required to come back for final plan when •uilding plans are prepared. ANALYSIS Planned Unit Development The development stage plan for the project depicted a hotel on lot 1 of the plat. The applicant has now submitted the final plan application which includes the building plans for the hotel and the final plat for the site. The submitted plans are significantly in conformance with the approved development stage plan in terms of site layout. As this is a phased development, certain portions of the site will be completed while others will remain without improvements. This being phase one of the development, the full entry drive will need to be constructed with all of the necessary curb and gutter, as will the exterior landscaping and fencing surrounding lot 1. Beyond that, all necessary on and off site improvements that will serve the hotel will also need to be completed. Building Materials/ Elevations The building elevations have been reviewed in comparison to the architectural design standards that were approved as a part of the Planned Unit Development for this site, and are deemed to be significantly in compliance with those standards. The only discrepancy that staff has noted is that the use of all Dryvit material does not fully satisfy staff s intention in regards to the requirement of a very distinct base, middle and top of the architecture. The elevation plans do call out a second option for the base of the hotel, that of Belden brick, jewel • Apollo Landing, page 2 blend. Staff has recommended a condition that the brick be used for the base in lieu of the Dryvit material to further reinforce the visual distinction between the base and the middle of the building. Building Height The architectural design standards limit height to 45 feet, as is the limitation in all GB (General Business) zoning district. The standards also allow the measurement of the height to be done in accordance with the zoning ordinance, which allows parapet walls to extend 4 feet beyond the 45 foot height limitation, as it is shown on the submitted elevations. Landscaping In accordance with the Screening requirements of the zoning ordinance screening is required along the boundary of the residential property adjacent to this commercial use. Either a green belt with 80% opacity, six feet in height must be provided, or alternatively a solid screening fence six feet in height. The plans as submitted provide a six -foot fence augmented with some additional landscaping. However, the fence detail that is shown is not meeting the 80% opacity standard and therefore staff is recommending a condition that the fence detail be revised to meet the standards. The entry drive is proposed to have linden trees spaced approximately 50 feet on center, though the spacing is uneven since the location of curb cuts prohibit exact spacing. A total of 16 pairs of trees are depicted on the plan. The ground cover will consist of sod and mixed prairie grass where appropriate (drainage areas). •The landscaping for the hotel site includes perimeter trees spaced approximately 40 feet on center, with mixed prairie grass and forbs. The internal site includes sod, numerous shrubs, and some decorative trees. Overall the landscaping is appropriate and in keeping with the architectural design guidelines for the site. Parking The original proposal for the hotel included 80 rooms which equates to 96 parking spaces for this lot. The current proposal includes 94 rooms which will require 116 stalls. That exceeds what is provided on this lot, however with the use of 20 shared parking spots on the other sites the parking need can be accommodated. This deviation from the strict enforcement of the parking standards is justified by the shared parking analysis, as well as the condition of approval that was added by the Planning and Zoning Board supporting a further reduction of parking on the site. Since this is the first phase, those shared parking spots will not be available at this time. Staff is recommending a condition that the 20 additional parking spaces be added to the plans to account for the shortage of parking on the hotel site. This additional parking will need to be adjacent or as close as possible to the hotel. Final Plat The final plat depicts one lot for the hotel and a large outlot that will encompass the rest of the development. The final plat is in substantial conformance with the layout that was approved as a part of the development stage plan. The title commitment and association documents have been submitted and are being reviewed by the City Attorney. • Apollo Landing, page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD SThe Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31St regular meeting. Their comments are attached and are addressed in the conditions of approval for the project. OPTIONS 1. Approve the final plan for the hotel at Apollo Landing 2. Deny the project. 3. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The base of the hotel must be constructed using belden brick, jewel blend as is called out currently as an alternate on the elevation. 2. The vinyl fence for the project must be a minimum of 80% opaque. 3. 20 additional parking spaces will need to be built within the subdivision to provide the minimum number of parking spaces for the proposed use. 4. Infiltration ponds must include city native seed mix, supplemented with potted plants. 5. A three year management contract with an experienced native plant establishment and maintenance company must be established. • 6. All sodded areas must be irrigated. 7. Mulch for landscape areas must be wood chip mulch rather than rock mulch. 8. Substitute Red or Autumn Blaze maples for all Norway maples on the landscape plan. 9. A revised landscape plan depicting all of the required changes in landscaping must be approved by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. ATTACHMENTS 1. City Engineer's memorandum dated September 1, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Hampton Inn (Apollo Landing) Plan Set received August 15, 2005. 4. Apollo Landing Final Plat received August 15, 2005 • • • • Memorandum DATE: September 1, 2005 TO: Paul Bengtson FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Apollo Landing Attached for your use is the TKDA review dated August 31, 2005 for the Apollo Landing project. Final approval has been given for this project. Please contact me at 651/982 -2430 with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino. Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 0 Fax: 651 -982 -2499 TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: Mr. Jim Studenski, P. E. Reference: Apollo Landing Copies To: Hampton Inn City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Proj. No.: 13265.002 From: Thomas Prew, P. E. Routing: Date: August 31, 2005 We reviewed the items submitted on August 15, 2005, for review. These items include: Rice Creek Watershed District Permit, Site Plan, and Plat. These items are order, and we recommend approval of them. There are no special conditions on the watershed permit. Please let me know if you have any questions. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board August 31, 2005 The following recommendations were made at the August 31, 2005 Environmental Board Meeting: Apollo Landing Infiltration pond #1 does not show a ground cover. Infiltration ponds should be seeded with our City native seed mix, and supplemented with potted plants. Management of this area should be encumbered under at least a three year contract with a company experienced in native plant establishment and maintenance. The contract should cover at least one Burn at the end of three years. Any contract should be reviewed by the city for acceptability. Around the Hotel), something other than Norway maple should be planted, particularly on the North side of the Hotel. Norway maples are considered invasive to our woodlands. Red or Autumn Blaze maples might be substituted for the Norway maples. Infiltration pond # 2 should have the same consideration as infiltration pond # 1 sited above. • All sodded areas around the Hotel must be shown as irrigated. Trees shown on the East side of entrance are not identified. Bordering areas along the property lines are shown as rock mulch and native prairie. Developer should indicate which option is the intended use. If the intended use is native plants, than more formal plantings around the perimeter would be more appropriate. Wood chip mulch would be more appropriate for these plantings as well as for the substituted red /autumn blaze maples. Lime stone rock will lower the pH and cause growth problems for the plants. Reduce parking as much as possible and /or use pervious parking. Motion to approve by Bor, second by Bauman. All were in favor and motion passed. • • ROOF SCUPPER --- 'us To — JiamPievcovu COORDINATE ELECTRTEAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SONAGE • --EXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEM - PRERINISHED ALum. HINDOw , AND LOUVERS -TYPICAL CONTROL JOINT It TOP - ROOF OF-CR , - - 71— OEAST ELEVATION 3/32° = EX! ER:OR FINISH SYSTEM TYPICAL -- - ocraRot. Jottif EN TRY CANOPY KYOTO ETCH 'op, IFCA.:RTH IROOF THRO 00P n? NORTH ELEVATION 3/32- = ALUMINUM STOREFRONT c 2: ALUMINJAI STOREFRON I SEEING DOORS El.& COLOR LEGEND tos so- p44 TC % COLOR OP 'vt #3-4t '603... TFRN17 EAR,. 5, F.W: REFERENCE S7ANDAROS FCR APPROVED COLOR ("PITONS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT http:Avwx.LHBcorp.com LE LejTV 0- 4005 AE SGS Orr REV1.7A INY: DATE .*v 3o. _ tOtt,,,,tItt‘I`s cta".05 C.V.V11.1 22162+1.N. NS 4.. HAMPTON INN, APOLLO LANDING LINO LAKES, MN DRAVAIC TTS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FLE Darm BY DS CLECXEC EY MCP PROI 0531H ORAINNG HO- A5.00 LE • • • f 0 WEST ELEvATION 3/32- VEPHE AO Cr.:cP kk•.1,0.4)1.1 ' ..CN • FOURTH R OCR niiRD FLOOR, SECOND FLOCR. I9€9 ALUM 1,NRCOW AMC LOu,ERS ALWINUI■ S'.'EFRONT (7-2- SOUTH ELEVATION 3/32 • - HOU.Ovi METAL ^COQ AK FRAME •.tv-r it 44.7 L,DEF. 211 =PER PCSHEZ UE. LC:,../ERS PROPERT, BEr-CRE LCCARNC. ROCF FS...ARMEN-7 5 AE' J-' SCREENED k. 'DC NCT .i.S.'cirkL. kiRLD BAYS .NTRDDUCN■k 7,RC) L Ellk4EV Cr;-SET ASIT)-5 COLOR LEGEND LJ ORT,A7' r.:1" 0.41 PA 7CHROCCi A_T:R Ns-S. ERCR XWE' StkLIND RE.FERER..E. i FRO kliOS FCP PROVED S;_,7:P CP 71.0,..s Nip xw% LiEccrp.arr A1 E 2005 C1TYOU: uNn. s NV • CAR RC1 05105 NC_ HAMPTON INN, APOLLO LANDING LJNO LAKES, MN .144.1"IC rrra EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5.01 4 1 • PLAN NORTH (Th FIRST FLOOR PLAN - CENTER LOADED LOBBY \--1 3/32' 0 5.35 21.4 7' httpllwww.LHBcorp.com No DATE WY REVIEW PENSION Ry QRE1.ro we" pOR r INN, APOLLO LANDING LINO LAKES, MN DRAWING TRIE: FIRST FLOOR PLAN FIE DRAWN DY TAS OEOKED 0Y: MDR PRO.I. NO: 050111 DRAWING NO: A1.02 • 1•■ § UNEN STORAGE 252 242c3' 23'3' 2V-3. 51,-41V UNEL CHU1E R25 ICE MACHINE, W/ FLOOR DRAIN BELO! VEND 253 LOW R 411)11-0■411 1• hi. a 0111% MIL"' I 1 I I Valls, 111:11 ilium ell A I I 1 Am` Ili alb ME Ilk /SIM • le 01/ ELEV LOBBY 251 I ;1 atm Li ■sw ti L . .•4 VA rem 7 mix NM ea I !IOW 'Lai I I Mel 4*-710-5-IF OW ROOF I VESTIBULE LOW ROOF LO OOF PLAN NORTH @SECOND FLOOR PLAN — CENTER LOADED LOBBY 3/32" 0 5.35 10.7 21.4 http://wonviliBcorp.cam AU': 2005 f,-;777 C !iN LX SIM CFN renen NO DALE REVISION 1311E\ 1Tel 4.105 ca,Prk-n, L....T. A11..ngesEN-01, HAMPTON INN, APOLLO LANDING LINO LAKES, MN DRAINING TITIE: SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIE 533215 33 TAS CHECKED BY IIGP PM. NO: 050111 DRAWING NO: A1.03 • • 6' -6' 44'-O' 54. -2. ICE MACHINE W/ FLOOR DRAIN BELOW UNEN STORAGE 352 452 PLAN rn FLOOR PLAN - CENTER LOADED LOBBY N 0 R TH ETHIRD/FOURTH ,13/32' = r —a• 0___. 535 107 21.4 http://www.LHBcorp.com LLUJ 1 A ems cm R'VEW NO DATE F or OR 505 0:4,fiIGF: 2,6E, 4.3 ING Ni w:aln ctiF.G F'RDECf HMY^C HAMPTON INN, APOLLO LANDING LINO LAKES, MN DRAWING THE THIRD /FOURTH FLOOR PLA FILE: DRAWN BY TAS CHECKED BY: VP PRO. NO: 050111 DRAWING 00: A1104 • • • --COORDINATE ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNAGE EXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEM PREFINISHED ALUM. WINDOW AND LOUVERS ROOF SCUPPER Viw u TOP OF ROOF DECK FOURTH FLOOR THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR GROUND FLOOR OEAST ELEVATION 3/32" 1' -0" EXTERIOR - FINISH SYSTEM TYPICAL CONTROL JOINT ENTRY CANOPY BEYOND w TOP OF Y ROOF DECK to FOURTH 45 FLOOR m o 1 1 THIRD FLOOR ro SECOND m FLOOR GROUND ONORTH ELEVATION 3/32" - ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 0 135 10.7 21.4 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SLIDING 000RS TYPICAL CONTROL JOINT E.F.S. COLOR LEGEND COLOR: DRYVIT /108 MANOR WHITE COLOR: DRYV1T /442 COTTON COLOR: DRYV1T /346 PATCHw000 ALTERNATE: BELDEN BRICK. JEWEL BLEND REFERENCE STANDARDS FOR APPROVED COLOR OPTIONS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT http://www.LHBcorp.com LEE 0 ND MATS CRY REMY DATE REVISION RM)ffCT NAME: HAMPTON INN, APOLLO LANDING UNO LAKES, MN DRAWING TITIF. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FIE: DRAWN 8Y: TAS PECKED BY: MG. PR01 Na 020111 DRAWNG NKX A5.00 • • • TOP OF ROOF DECK FOURTH FLOOR THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR GROUND FLOOR OPTIONAL SIGNAGE LOCATION TYPICAL CONTROL JOINT EXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEM PREF1NISHED ALUM. WINDOW AND LOUVERS OWEST ELEVATION 3/32" 1. -0" OVERHEAD DOOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT co TOP OF ROOF m DECK e0FOURTH FLOOR THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR EXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEM ATYPICAL CONTROI. JOINT GROUND ¶LOOR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT O SOUTH ELEVATION 3/32" m 1' -0• HOL OW METAL DOOR AND FRAME PREFINISHED ALUM. WINDOW AND LOUVERS ROOF SCUPPER 12. -5- MINIMUM' CLEARANCE SIGN SLOPE DRIVE TO DRAIN OUT FROM UNDER UT T FRY 0 5.35 10.7 21.4 PREFINISHEO METAL LOUVERS NOTE: 1. REVIEW ALL VIEWS AROUND PROPERTY BEFORE LOCATING ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT. VERIFY ALL EQUIPMENT IS ADEQUATELY SCREENED. 2. D0 NOT EXCEED 5 STRUCTURAL BAYS VATHOUT INTRODUCING A VERTICAL ELEMENT (I.E. BUILDING OFFSET, PILASTER, ETC) E.F.S. COLOR LEGEND COLOR: DRYVIT /106 MANOR WHITE COLOR: DRYVIT 042 COTTON COLOR: DRYVIT /346 PATCHWOOO ALTERNATE: BELDEN BRICK, JEWEL BLEND REFERENCE STANDARDS FOR APPROVED COLOR OPTIONS. httpJIWWW.LHBcorp.com LHE Ci ti • W15'06 Ott EVEN NO BATE REVISION PROJECT HAMNAME: PTON INN, APOLLO LANDING LINO LAKES, MN DRAWING TOLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FILE: DRAWN BY: 1AS OWCKED BY: RCP FRO. NOI 050111 TRAWNG N0: A5.01 • 1 4 1 2 1 Li l...),,,,) L) di. ' L_ -------.. I .\4- . _ — 9 1 • 0 5.:...5. -1;(, '-') — _ J- , LAi i J ,A/ . L ■c.i J . ._,. C.,T., ii . L Ii T I -7, - 7 i T i "'"" .i . 1' " '" —r 1 —4 I —4, — • 11, — -.- /"4I „ , — 4.7ii i ' IrA‘44T.4A1-01 .*tA k • : *AAl4ip lliCir 4 - M. . 'A TC H UNE S! . HETi, : C2 i i =,; .■1,,..,,,....,- *SAfig, 1 \\ DIMOSterg It 1 % :44t■Wb STA: 0381.80B, _ 1- _ -____. _ _ _ ..1 -.._ _ ...., \ 1 FUTURE PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER OFFSET: 0.0000 R ' i TIPWPF Q■ie,c*, 1 1 i : 1 . I 1 1 . 1 . (..:Y) II I 1 I 1 1 fr.!, 111111! 1 CFI 1 LID 1 it 11§to \ l'I'---1_11)(1111.1 i i.-- -4- .--t. V I r-- ) t r) /11 ' -0(1,. 5 .....,. _i__ _I. _al __1_ L_ ----- \•_ __;„ 001 4144, . 4&4N , IIIIII/I I i 1 ----- ) i • .— —,, • 3: ' sl.Nt,,Alrylipiolt. i 77-- 7 7-17 1-1-7,it , ; 1 *&‘47■146tATIONIIi! -f- --ri , ;, ' ,I - ...• , 71r) / , ---, ; ! • , t illitk■ ;411§v .-1.4_,k-• ••• L — -4' _ ____r J I / / ii -4101k‘ i, .44) ,0110 -A., ‘•-4,. , 9 t , k , v„,_' , . i I tioNg,01)1. N., . : , • , j . 1 ! 1 1 ..„, "r1Pqr % 4 ' i 1 1 i 1 1 l , 1 1 i i 1 . 461% ___ 1 4frsfto, - 01--i---==-LD ' Vir--4WIti \ -r, if 1 I it I I ;11 \II L L — —• SIC arr2n#6 '- OFFSET: 13.000021 a -o CD cn - • 0 1 STA: 0+110.475 OFFSET: 13.0000 R .2 I - — STA 0+060.600 E I OFFSET: 18.0000 R.2 I co O) 1 00 I 01. 1 00 0 t. D \. •tr 4 117 FUTOBE PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER 1r 7 7 iI1_L1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1\1 1 1 1 ijrci\PI 0970 280. 3 Dumps SOO°44'49"V\ • I I ti _ g 1 r1,410t, PLANT SCHEDULE SITE DESIGN CALCULATIONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS: ONE (1) SPACE PER EACH RENTAL UNIT PLUS ONE (1) SPACE PER EACH 8 UNITS PLUS ONE (1) SPACE FOR EACH EMPLOYEE ON ANY SHIFT. (SEC. 3, SUB. 5, PARA. F-20) PLAN CALLS FOR 94 ROOMS WITH 10 EMPLOYEES, REQUIRING 115 STALLS PLAN PROVIDES 96 ON-SITE STALLS AND SHALL HAVE 20 SHARED STALLS WITH THE PUD AREA STALL DIMENSIONS FOR 90 DEGREE PARKING = 9'x18' AISLE WIDTH: 24' SETBACKS; 30 SIDEYARD 40 BACK YARD FACING RESIDENTIAL IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS; TOTAL AREA: 90,300 SF PERVIOUS AREA : 24,000 SF = 3710 PERVIOUS IV 10M I3T0ICA1/0011101 0** BEZEMTE SPAM 0 0 0 SNUBS AND GROUNDCOVER X MOSTA ROYAL STANDSARCA 0 POT PER PLAN X Hammes Ills 11e1a cle Oro / STELLA DE ORO DAYLLY II POT PER PLAN X Poterthea Irv... forgo. / DAKOTA SUNSPOT POTENTLLA a. POT PER PUN 0 Mum.. Iraopirm 'Alfredo' / ALFREDO AMERICAN VIBURNUM 21 POI PER PLAN 0 $ n• ' Juniper. Wxom. lis 'Plumose Youngstown. / YOUNGSTOWN ANDORRA JUMPER 13 POT AER PLAN x Junipe ors maul... Blue 1,0*' / BLUE TRAK. ROCKY INJUNTAIN JUNIPER 38. POT PER RAN 8 Tex. a Media Migle / NIGRA YEW LI POT PER PLAN TREES TC X 110* COrdell / LITTLE LEAF LINDEN r 88 PER PLAN AP X Am pletertoraes Tello(kle' / OREGON PRIDE MAPLE 0 BB PER PLAN MA X Maul. Neuron. / AMUR MAACKIA 7. BB PER PLAN PGD X Picea puce var. Dee.. / BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 0 HT BB PER PLAN SITE SHEET INDEX 0 leo' 2130' v \ 'tit! E40 2 1 LEGEND YOWL OWN IPRX/REVOON SERSOCE PM* 00000 CONIEUR. I* WOW ---a24- - - masa callow 5' sow ----ezr"'” EXPOSED ODIUM WI PRCFCCD ECIAN0115 MAIM MAN RAI WAR MANCE ROI MI WM( ER PIER Plf SORT LENT PUCK 13m0( cal clout) TEILPICNE COLE COOUT/CUCT PHI EIPCISC oaE CLICUT/OUCT MERCK IMOLE/PDISALACCI EIETK INICLE/PEDESIVEOX 00 040(300/100 KM CAN CABLE SPED MINN CALE BtRED ELECIRC CARLE SVITIM ST= SEM DER IPAPOI 13230*0*0 524. I • I 851MI0US >AVM ION 1 21 W. Superior Street Suite 500 Duluth, MN 55802 10L21&727.8446 FAX 2181127-8456 http://wvAvAJ-113corp.com LHB DULUTH • MINNEAPOLIS II!. - tZ c 4:2 LJJ 171-7V T77 1\1-) 5 8/045 CITY REVEYI NO 0A7E REVISION PROJECT MAC HAMPTON INN, APOLLO LANDING A LINO LAKES, MN DRAWING ME SITE LAYOUT AND PLANTING PLAN - SITE ENTRY FIEO: \OSPROJ\050111\011/CS\C \050111C1.026 DRAWN BY:PDC CHEMED — PROJ. NO:050111 DRAWING NO, C1 -1 38.6' MIXED PRAIRIE GRASS AND FORM 242. B 1 42.0' AM N00 °44'46 "E 323.61'0 ° mr (r-_ sti�I1, �p��,��.��h► . ..Ib. . ..1►. .emu. _ �•� Igit..„ _y������I�I� ���,g��� AT�& f�� +ikji iriL-�lYl'x• r -f_ sg-- .-_y--. --..-p _!� a1 '+.I�VW!® ems_— l�' t' to - -1 ,�+/ r \ .gip +'.\ -.\ -T • � ... �� �i�';�/ `I -LA 1 \ \I \ q�� \ \Ii�i �\ \Y ♦ \ .♦ '; fit' It�I\\\\;\•\\ \\:`�\; ♦T`` \�^\�;�; Y \� \T ♦\ \;_�\\ v -\ \ BAOK \\ \\•\‘‘...•\`:,; \� x/♦;;`,�\\ `\;`;s;\\ N • 24 ♦ \\ \ \♦ \X13.6\ \♦ ` \9‘5\ `♦ ` `♦ ` �di'.• ` ♦ ♦• ♦\ \` \ 4 \ :I \W4li l � III %( \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ ` \ • ` \ \ �1�3`li� \' 1. . ♦ \ \. \ \. . \ `. ♦ \ \ \\ ♦ \ ` v 1 It�!I. 1 ili Rif N at 1 m (1111M1111.M11111131111 ■® OOOO:6ir CD \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ el ee e:• 000 Xaoo�i.� _a.�lly O 00 I 4 • -a aaema L -.. 000tr, 2 4. PERIMETER TREES AT 40' O.C. MIXED PRAIRIE GRASS AND FORBS q SOD MATCH LINE S 0 lost 20.0• 4 1 15' 2 BRA00U6 PANIC PRIME GRASS ND FIRES 100( YIP !MI 1 1 1 PLANT SCHEDULE SITE DESIGN CALCULATIONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS: ONE (1) SPACE PER EACH RENTAL UNIT PLUS ONE (1) SPACE PER EACH 8 UNITS PLUS ONE (1) SPACE FOR EACH EMPLOYEE ON ANY SHIFT. (SEC. 3, SUB. 5, PARA. F -20) PLAN CALLS FOR 94 ROOMS WITH 10 EMPLOYEES, REQUIRING 116 STALLS PLAN PROVIDES 96 ON -SITE STALLS AND SHALL HAVE 20 SHARED STALLS IN THE PUD AREA STALL DIMENSIONS FOR 90 DEGREE PARKING = 9'x18' AISLE WIDTH: 24' SETBACKS: 30' SIDEYARD 40' BACK YARD FACING RESIDENTIAL IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS' TOTAL AREA: 90,300 SF PERVIOUS AREA : 24,000 SF = 37% PERVIOUS KB W. BDTAIICAI/COWgI ME SRE/TYPE SPACING Q 0 /�O `: l SNUBS AND GROUNOCOVER X NOSTA ROYAL STANDSARD' R Poi PER NUN x Hemerec.10, 'Stella de Oro' / STELLA DE OR0 DAYLKY R POT PER RAN 0 PotentN. Irutico.s Tap. / DAKOTA SUNSPOT POTENTILLA 24 POT PER PLAN X VI°uroun triolum 18108,00' / ALFREDO AMERICAN VIBURNUM 21• POT PER PLAN OX 0 Junperus larixontaps Plumose Va ps!PAA' / YOUNGSTOWN ANDORRA JUMPER D POT PER RAN 0 Juniperus 000 80 um .91u. Tral' / BLUE TRAIL ROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER 211' POT PER RAN 0 Toays . media TApr1 / NIGRA YEW 13 POT PER PLAN TREES TO X 111. co,oats / LITTLE LEAF LINDEN r BB PER RAN AP X Acer platamlces 13a0p,M.' / OREGON PRIDE MAPLE r BB PER RAN MA X Maackis emurenos / AMUR MAACKIA X. BB PER RAN PGD X Pies. plauca var. 0enset. / BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 0 HT BB PER RAN MADISON VARIES r HARDWOOD IDL01 GEDIEXRE FABISC - INSTALL PER MANUF. SPEC PLASTIC EDGING - INSTALL PER MANUF. SPEC. SEE PLAN —500. t (8lN 15E G000 1TIPSOL (INN 6 °) PUNTING SOL SIIBSO1, 110TE NSTML RANTS PLUMB AND WATER MID TAMP SOL THOROUGHLY. SHRUB PLANTING N.T.S. 2 VNYL POST CAP B' CM TO C1R 1 -7 FACE 10 FACE 550 PfOSXT I ' II�II ■III■1� ■11�111�1 owl III�14 31 P/I I111111� 1 1/2" POET 11111 •�II�II) AT (2) DOS 1.25 BOTTOM WM RAIL INCLUDES REINFORCING METAL INSERT NOTES 1. FOOTING WIDTH TO BE (2)0 POST 880111 MINIMUM DEPTH 30". 2" NOM u VINYL FENCE ELEVATION N.T.S. PCLIPROPILDIE AT STRAPS AT BARK TURNBUCKLE - GALV. OR OW PNNIED 2.5x BALI. DIA MIN. TREE PLANTING N.T.S. 'N811E FLAG 55 EApi. FASTEN AT le551 MINES 3" MOOD MULCH OWR FILTER FABRIC � 7, MN 24 BELOW (MADE. PUKING SON. FEW FiMMED SAUCER - AN0E O<' REPOSE VARIES 11115 57.CPE - 11 MAX 0W WRAP WOE FROM TOP 73 OF ROOT BALL. N ALL PLUMB. WATER AND TAMP SOL 19OROUGILY. COMPACTED 5111501. TO PREVENT C >o D D 21 W. Superior Street Suite 500 Duluth, MN 55802 TEL 218/727-8446 FAX 2181727 -8456 httpJ /www.LHBcorp.com DULUTH ° MINNEAPOLIS Qj 50005 CITY REVEW DATE PEVI5x1N Ry pOR C 8115105 CCPYRCNT 210500 LHB. INC ALL/ .17S RESERVED HAMPTON INN, APOLLO LANDING LINO LAKES, MN A DRAWING TOLE SITE LAYOUT AND PLANTING PLAN - HOTEL AREA FEED ; \05PRa \050111\OMCS \C \000TllC1 .DWG DRAWN BY:ROC PECKED BY: — PROJ. N0:0.5o1T1 C2 °RAMO NO: N a N 5 a 5 0 s_" -° 8 r -South Tine of the North 500.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter / of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8. 731. R22. Block 1 L N • Apollo • Landing ICN(IW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That'Equinox Development, LLP, a Minnesota Limited Liability Partnership, and Wyst Properties, Inc., a Minnesota Cororation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, to- wit :; S89' 89''06.04 "E 660.01 Itch!• I:4 van (' f 1 \ ". "1 /` /\ ■ \`' Lot 1 sr \°o \ l I1` < +6,? -1 `,\ P Ly \ 4r . \\ .„\ \ 4'2 `,\ w • \ , A�bb �\\ 'S \i1' , 6' 45'.` `\ 8I' \-- - — _ 45 \\ _ rInmtrationio 1 Easement \� ,� ........ �\� \ Outlot A 1 \ \, r 1 ea.njnn. ‘ si �'tr }��\N _ _ /� 322.21 9 !j'e t •, �\ . �'— f -� --� � e� �4,\ \I` ` 150.00 N89'00'03 "W 403.51 1" - North Inc I of South 500.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest of Section 8. T31. 922. 1 \ • r\ 1 q,y 1\ � • \\ N. 91i\ •A L. \\ \ ,) \ a gin. Lips'\ u `halo yea \ \ ,� 4'! `_. 20 InfOtrotior \ 6i \4.''i \ `�' 1\ 17 r �,�i Easement Infiltration ; .\�q,. \ ‘..,,\,\ 1 Notary Public, County, Minnesota `1 rn J I Easement �I \�� \Jf My Commission expires \ J i \ \� \� $ °o° \J 11 $ 4/ �� j . 4\:,...:41 I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as APOLLO LANDING, that r \ Z I• lee s5 - = 157a Za's�6 this plat is a cones representation of the survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in &d and .. \ / p ° L 1 �%as ��a 'p �, hundredths of a foot, that all monuments wril be correctly placed in the ground as designated, that the oudside \ c rvrrr ` o Nesrooro3-w zar.4a °' boundary lines are correctly designated on the tat, and that there are no wet lands as defined in MS 505. Subd. I, lid r . f\ s 1...0-.. J -\ — / or public highways to be designated on the plat. . 500.00 v Ie$�a —r �- //� (_ _ CE. - -' - - -- i« � a � et ) / �htto ���� Tedd W. Mattke, Land surveyor -) ,� ,°. wrT Uµ0' i • $ ' Minnesota License No. 15612 4. rails 0 d` 4%4,, ? / `t `✓ ; ' STATE OF MINNESOTA) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 03 g $ 1 I ` `` ` y``3� 0 /.- - ,d, ,.,•.`'.9 S1......,-'/' • • COUNTY OF ) 2005, by Tedd W. Mauls, Land Surveyor. Z N I der. .`ss• ,� / . / R�$94 '4 „4 -geiW. - - - - -j qs ., q` _0: f' Notary Public, County,Minesota a 1 17oc Res / M rt��s ° y ° o� b)Q ee My Commission expires I'd` e a°�b'�ps/ ,, cbeq'. . I hereby certify that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, duly accepted and 1 v� /SJ� ty . , approved the plat of APOLLO LANDING at a mee meeting held this _ da of , 2005. \ I __ / J \0 . / • u' -' 4 �4 0,:cb If applicable, written comments and recommendations ofthe Commissioner of Transportation and the County. Checked and Approved this day of , 2005. ' Southwest comer of the Southeast Quarter 1 ` o .a "' / : q 4S °'qt, Highway Engineer have been received by the City, or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of By ,Anoka County Surveyor. -- /�, of the Southwest Cromer of Section 8, T31, 822. / , FQ�~ / , k, 4 such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2 — - - - - - -- - - -- - ---- -- d �o c,C.,`::::// 1'- ' .p / _ _ ., S „ 8 1 City of Lino Lakes n "' N •`. ! Anoka Co l_� - -- 320.00 n Lilac Drive - ro -- 838.79 -- _� County, Minnesota; - - - - - -- - - - n - - —_ - - -- - N89.00'03 "W 180.00 BY ,Mayor ------ - - - -l- I 10 , •- �� I 4 1 �_ 1._ �- South Inc I of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of S anion 8, T31, R22. An Anoka County Morrment- _ - South Quarter comer By City Manager Section 8, 131, R22 ry er g Thal part of the West 660.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Rage 22, Lying South of the North 500.00 feet and North of the South 500.00 feet thereof AND ■ 1 That pact of the West 500.00 feet of the South 500.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of • Section 8, Township 31, Range.22, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest o: ! Comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence Easterly along the South line of said Southeast F Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance 0(320.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the Tine to be described: theme Northerly at a right angle, a distance of 500.00 feet and there terminating, 5 AND That pan of the East 160.00 feet of the West 660.00 &et of the South 500.00 feet of the Southeast Quartet of the g Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, lying North of a line being 50.00 feet North of the centerline of public shed described as follows: Commencing at the South Quarter Comer of said Section 8, b • Township P 31, Range 22; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 836.79 feet to the point of beginning ofthe centerline to be described; thence T. Northeasterly 1124.51 feet along the are of a non-tangential curve, concave to the Southeast, having a central angle of i78 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds, and a radius of 818.51 fiat, the long chord of which bears North 67 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds East 1038.14 feet; thence South 73 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East a distance 0(221.72 feet, 5 more or less, to the centerline of Lake Drive and there terminating. 5 Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as APOLLO LANDING and do hereby donate and dedicate to the b public for public use forever the easements for M d dedirntiog the easements for infiltration �' drainage and at.liIn witness h shown ef said id on the Equinox also Development, LLP has caused these purposes as shown on the let In wittiese wllerw said Equinox presents to be signed by its Managing Partner this day of In 5 , 2005. Also in witness whereo4 said Wyst Propaties, Inc. has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _day of .2005. 3 Equinox Development, 1 2 Wyst Properties, Inc, • e :r Craig S. Prate, Managing Partner g Clyde D. Wyatt, Its President e STATE OF MINNESOTA) The foregoing instrument was ackhowicdged before me this _day of . f COUNTY OF 1 2005, by Craig S. Piette, as Managing Partner of Equinox Development, LLP, a ;€ Minnesota Limited Liability Patrietship, on behalf of the partnership. `o Notary Public, County, My Commission expires Minnesota • STATE OF MINNESOTA) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of COUNTY OF ) 2005, by Clyde D. Wyatt, as President of Wyst Properties, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. eo City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 8, T31, R22 AUG Y 2EE5 `i i 'tjr . GRAPHIC SCALE ro w m 240 (01 rrxr ) 1 Inch - 80 ft. NOTE: FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT, THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, T31, R22 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N89'00'03 "W. Qa DENOTES AN ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT o DENOTES 1/2" IRON PIPE SET AND • MARKED BY R.L.S. REGISTRATION N0. 15612 DRAINAGE Qc UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: LIO 10- 1 _1J 1 L__ c NO SCALE BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, ADJOINING LOT LINES AND RIGHT -OF -WAY IINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. Ma t tke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. • AGENDA ITEM V.B. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: September 14, 2005 TOPIC: Rezoning to R -1X (Single Family Executive) and GB (General Business) Preliminary Plat — Pine Glen MUSA Allocation BACKGROUND The Planning and Zoning Board held the public hearing for 23, LLC's request for a 78 -lot single - family residential and 2 lot commercial subdivision entitled Pine Glen at the August 10, 2005 regular meeting. The public hearing was closed, some direction was given to staff and the developer in regards to the concerns of both the public and the board, and the item was tabled. The item is now being brought forth with some revisions and additional information. The request has been modified to include Rezoning to R -1X (Single Family Executive) and GB (General Business); 63.81 acres of MUSA allocation; and a preliminary plat for 72 residential and 2 commercial lots. The subject property is located on the east side of Lake Drive approximately 900 feet south of Main Street. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density sewered residential use and it is currently zoned R -X (Rural Executive), R (Rural), and GB (General Business). The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on Thursday, July 28th, giving notice to neighbors using mailing labels supplied by the City of Lino Lakes Community Development Department. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential R -X North Single Family Residential Low Density Unsewered Residential R South Single Family Residential Low Density Unsewered Residential R -1X East Single Family Residential Low Density Unsewered Residential R West Lake Drive N/A — Right of Way N/A • Pine Glen page 2 • The following is a summary of the of the proposal's density: • • Gross Site Area 68.46 acres Commercial Area 4.08 acres Residential Upland Area 40.70 acres Total Lots 72 Gross Density 1.05 units /acre Net Density 1.76 units /acre The comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area, but would need to be added to the MUSA boundary of the city. Municipal water and sanitary sewer are available in the Lake Drive right -of -way. The proposed design fits within the Low Density range of up to three units per acre. Growth Management: MUSA Reserve: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy establish a specific number of MUSA acres for residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The proposed phasing plan will require the allocation of 4.08 acres of commercial and approximately 16.41 acres of residential MUSA reserve in year 2006, and approximately 43.32 acres of MUSA reserve in year 2007. The residential spreadsheet tracking this information is attached to the end of this report, the commercial spreadsheet is too large to attach, but supposing that this development is approved, there will be 68 acres of commercial reserve available. Growth Management, Units /Year: The comprehensive plan and growth management policy establish a specific number of units for residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The proposed phasing plan will require the allocation of 42 lots in year 2006, and 36 in year 2007. The spreadsheet tracking this information is attached to the end of this report. PRELIMINARY PLAT Lots: The proposed subdivision will consist of 72 residential lots, ranging in size from 11,942 square feet to 34,133 square feet. The minimum lot size in the R -1X (Single Family Executive) zoning district is 12,825 square feet of upland area. The upland lot areas of all the lots except Lot 23 of Block 3 and Lot 13 of Block 2 meet this standard. A condition has been included to require those two lots be increased in areas to meet the minimum standard. Staff is confident this revision can be easily accomplished. The proposed subdivision will also consist of 2 commercial lots of 56,398 and 121,505 square feet. The minimum lot size in the GB (General Business) zoning district is 20,000 square feet. • Pine Glen page 3 Access and Circulation: Access to the site is provided via a public street entering the site east from Lake Drive. The location of the street does not immediately create a direct intersection with a street traveling west of Lake Drive. This is a situation that will need to be remedied in the future. The applicant has shown on the plat a ghost plat indicating that Vicky Lane could be re- routed south to align itself with the proposed Street A of Pine Glen. Though this is probably not the final alignment this road will take, it does demonstrate the intent of the city and the potential to align the intersection. This will need to be enforced on the property adjacent to the west side of Lake Drive at such time that it is developed. Secondary access to the site is provided immediately through the existing Lois Lane. This is intended to provide an immediate secondary access to eliminate the development of an overly long cul -de -sac situation. This is a sound planning fundamental and has been the direction of the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council. This is clearly designed to be a secondary access point and will allow the current residents of Lois Lane another access as well. Future access points have been planned both to the north through James Street and to the south through the undeveloped right of way of Dupont Avenue. A temporary cul -de -sac will be required on the southern terminus of what is currently labeled Street B. The southern access to Dupont Avenue is being planned to allow the property owners to the south the potential to divide their lots in the future. Many things would need to occur in order for this to happen. It would require that utilities be hooked up to the existing homes as well as the future homes; and a street would need to be built at the expense of the property owners completely within the Dupont Avenue right of way or their private property and in accordance with the requirements of the utility line easement. Beyond the typical platting request and a rezoning, there would also need to be a comprehensive plan amendment to allow the area to be sewered and MUSA would need to be allocated. Within the development, the applicant has depicted 28 foot wide streets which do not meet city standards. A condition has been added requiring that the applicant provide 32 foot wide streets that meet all of city standards. Lake Drive will need to be expanded in the future to adequately handle traffic, the timing of this expansion is not known at this time, however the full right of way dedication (60 feet from centerline) is being required at this time to accommodate those improvements. The City Engineer has reviewed the traffic analysis submitted by the applicant and had determined that it adequately addresses the traffic concerns for the project. The recommendations that a northern right turn lane and a southern left turn or bypass lane be added are acceptable. The Anoka County Highway department has not commented on the project at this time. An additional addendum to the traffic study was submitted as directed by the Planning and Zoning Board at the previous meeting. The memorandum addresses the amount of traffic that would potentially travel through the existing subdivision to the south. Pine Glen page 4 Utilities: The revised layout has not been completely engineered by the applicant, since they wanted to make sure the layout was acceptable to the board prior to spending the money on creating additional plans. Revised engineering plans will be required prior to the item going to the City Council and will need to address all of the City Engineer's comments from the previous plan, as well as continue to meet all city standards. Appropriate drainage and utility easements will need to be shown on both the commercial and residential lots prior to approval by the City Council. The lift station for the project must be shown within a 50' x 50' utility easement. Grading and Stormwater Management: The city engineer reviewed the previous submittal and his comments are attached. The revised layout will require a new set of plans that meet all of the previous comments, as well as conform to all city standards. Parks, Open Space: The proposal does not include any land dedication for parkland, only a cash dedication will be required. Park dedication fees are $2,075 per residential unit and $2,175 per commercial acre. The City of Lino Lakes Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan indicates a trail along the Lake Drive frontage that is not currently indicated on the proposed plans. A 15 foot wide trail easement will need to be dedicated to the city prior • to any final plat being approved by the City Council. The proposal does include a private trial system running along the south side of the property, which will link the homeowner's on the west side of the site to the greenway /open space on the east side of the project. The Park Board is going to review the potential for the trail at a future meeting. Staff is currently recommending that this trail be continued through the commercial portion of the site to the Lake Drive trail. • The eastern portion of the site is partially indicated as a greenway area on the City of Lino Lakes Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan. It also indicates a potential trail connection to the north to link up to the city park at old city hall. The applicant has previously discussed turning over the large greenway to the city. Staff is recommending this as a condition, with the stipulation that it will not reduce the park dedication fees required as part of the project. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed the project on July 27, 2005. The recommendations are attached and a number of the comments have been included as conditions of approval with this staff report. Including a conservation easement over the wetland portion of the site; native seed mix plantings with a three year management contract; a homeowner's association; City boulevard trees; and review of the commercial areas to require conformance with city standards. • • Pine Glen page 5 OPTIONS 1. Recommend approval of the project 2. Recommend denial of the project. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this item subject to the attached conditions. CONDITIONS 1. Phase 1 of the project including 40 residential lots can not be final platted until 2006. The final plat for phase 2 of the project including 32 residential lots can not be final platted until 2007. 2. A sign must be provided at the northern terminus of Street C and the southern terminus of Street B that indicate that the road is intended to continue in the future. 3. Homeowner's Association documentation must be submitted with the final plat application. 4. Park dedication fees must be paid in accordance with the city fee schedule. 5. A site and building plan review must be completed for both of the commercial lots prior to any commercial activities on those sites. 6. All existing structures must be removed prior to the approval of a final plat for any portion of Phase 1. 7. 4.08 acres of commercial MUSA is here by allocated to the commercial portion of the site. 8. 20.49 acres of residential MUSA for the year 2006, and 24.29 acres of residential MUSA for the year 2007 are here by allocated to the residential portion of the site. 9. City native seed mix must be used in all drainage ponds and wet areas and a 3 year management plan must be established with a reputable management company. 10. Right of way for Lake Drive shall be dedicated as 60 feet from centerline. • 11. A 15 foot wide trail easement along Lake Drive will need to be dedicated to the city prior to the City Council approving any final plat for the project. This • • • Pine Glen page 6 easement will need to be outside the ultimate right -of -way width for Lake Drive. 12. A sidewalk or trail connecting the private trail system to the commercial site and ultimately to the Lake Drive trail must be built as a part of the first phase of this development. 13. The project is subject to Rice Creek Watershed review and approval. 14. The project is subject to Anoka County Highway Department review and approval. 15. A temporary cul -de -sac must be provided at the southern terminus of Street C. 16. Plans depicting the integration of Street A into Lois Lane must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. 17. The outlots shown on the plat shall be turned over to the city, but shall in no way reduce the park dedication fees required for the project. 18. Lot 23 of Block 3 and Lot 13 of Block 2 must be increased in area to meet the 12, 825 square foot minimum lot area of the R -1X (Single Family Executive) zoning district. 19. Full engineering plans must be submitted for city staff review prior to this item being scheduled for the City Council. ATTACHMENTS 1. City Engineers comments dated August 5, 2005. 2. Environmental Board comments dated August 3, 2005. 3. Traffic Impact Analysis submitted August 2, 2005. 4. Traffic Impact Analysis addendum submitted September 9, 2005. 5. Pine Glen Preliminary Plat packet submitted July 07, 2005. 6. Revised Sketch Plan submitted September 1, 2005. Pine Glen, page 7 OTS /UNITS IP Development Name approved prelim. plats Prelim Plat I 2003 -09 total max. 1029 Year end 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Stoneybrook 2nd Addn 0 52 52 Century Farms North 249 56 65 52 43 33 249 Keefe: prel plat, not final plat 1 1 1 Morton (minor subdiv) 0 1 0 1 Ravens Hollow 56 0 56 56 Haley Manor (10 new lots) 10 10 0 10 Crystal Cove 3 3 0 3 Millers Crossroads 152 22 47 51 32 152 Lakeview Estates (2 new) 2 2 2 Snell (minor subdivision) 0 1 1 Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th 1 1 1 Justin's Preserve 1 1 1 Marshan Estates 4 4 4 Rice Creek Church duplex 2 2 2 Rice Church: Oakwood View 10 10 10 Junes Addn 2 2 2 ighland Meadows East 2nd 18 18 18 arshan Townhomes 2nd 23 23 Pheasant Hills 12th island 8 8 8 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add 1 1 1 Vaughan Addition 5 5 5 Angie's Acres (1 new) 1 1 1 Marshan Lakeview (2 new) 2 2 2 Marshan Meadows 20 20 20 Cavegn Estates (1 new) 1 1 Proposed: Pine Glen 76 40 32 76 total 148 176 171 138 65 698 remaining of annual 147 -1 -29 -24 9 82 147 147 remaining of 1029 for pre -2010 331 exceeds target of 147 by 1 29 24 percent 0.7% 19.7% 16.3% • Pine Glen, page 8 MUSA ALLOCATION 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TOTAL �RESIDENTIAL nnual target 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 252.0 27.7 55.0 20.9 3.7 1.4 0.7 40.7 Stoneybrook 27.7 Century Farms North 15.3 11.4 13.5 5.4 9.4 Ravens Hollow 20.9 Justin's Preserve 3.7 Junes Addition 1.4 Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th 5.6 Speiser Addition 1.5 Birch St.: 441, 461, 473, 495 5.0 West Shadow Ponds 2nd 0.7 Proposed Pine Glen 20.7 20 total 43.0 43.1 20.6 26.1 29.4 0.0 0.0 162.2 remaining of annual 36 -7.0 -7.1 15.4 9.9 6.6 36.0 36.0 89.8 exceeds target by • • 19% 20% • • • Memorandum DATE: August 5, 2005 TO: Paul Bengtson FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Pine Glen Attached is the TKDA review dated August 4, 2005, of the submitted documents for the Pine Glen subdivision. The following comments must be addressed prior to final approval given for this project. Please contact me with any questions. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 TKDA oNGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Preliminary Plat Review Lino Lakes City Engineer Pine Glen Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Proj. No.: 13265.002 From: Thomas Prew, P.E. Routing: Date: August 4, 2005 Pine Glen, is a proposed single family residential subdivision located to the east of Lake Drive (Anoka CSAH 23). The total development area is fifty (50) acres with fifty -seven (78) proposed single family residential lots /units, and 2 commercial lots. The development site will include streets, trails, sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and other infrastructure components that meet City of Lino Lakes standards and requirements. The engineering review below for the above referenced residential development site is based on the /following documents: 1. Preliminary Plat by Midwest Land Surveyors, undated. Received by the City of Lino Lakes July 7, 2005. 2. Preliminary Utility, Street, and Drainage Plans by L. S. J. Engineering dated June 28, 2005. Received by the City of Lino Lakes July 7, 2005. ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. STREET SYSTEM: • a) Street system is designed at 28 feet. 32 feet, back of curb to back of curb is required. b) The stub road to the north does not require a temporary cul -de -sac. The stub road to the south requires a temporary cul -de -sac. c) On the opposite side of Lake Drive a future re- routing of Vicky Lane is shown. This future layout has not been approved by the City. The future layout of Vicky Lane should be redesigned. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Preliminary Plat Review Page 2 August 4, 2005 Pine Glen City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 2. STORM SEWER SYSTEM ISSUES: a) Please see attached TKDA Drainage Calculation Review dated August 8, 2005. 3. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ISSUES: a) About 1/2 of the lots in this subdivision will flow into a lift station. The lift station will discharge into the proposed sanitary sewer system within this plat. The ultimate service area for this lift station will extend to at least the existing roads north and south of this plat. The City will further evaluate the elevations and trunk service area. b) The lift station is shown on Lot 30. This lot should be designated as City property. 4. WATER SYSTEM ISSUES: a) 12 -inch watermain is required from Lake Drive eastward to the north stub street; and then • northward towards James Street. 8 -inch watermain may serve the remainder of the plat. b) The Fire Chief should verify hydrant placement. 5. MISCELLANIOUS ISSUES: a) The trail should be continued to Lake Drive. • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Pine Glen Copies To: Drainage Calculation Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Proj. No.: 13265.002 Date: August 5, 2005 Routing: The following drainage review is based on these submittals: 1. Pine Glen Preliminary Plans as submitted by LSJ Engineering. Stamped received in Lino Lakes on July 7, 2005. 2. Pine Glen Runoff Calculations as submitted by LSJ Engineering, Inc. Stamped received in Lino Lakes on July 7, 2005. Drainage Review Comments: 01. Include the existing wetland to the east of the site in the HydroCAD models and indicate the 100 -year elevation and emergency overflow elevation on the plans. The low floor elevation of the adjacent houses is required to be a minimum of 2 feet above the 100 -year elevation and 4 feet above the ground water table. The low opening of the adjacent houses is required to be a minimum of 1 foot above the emergency overflow. 2. Provide emergency overflows for all ponds and label the locations and elevations on the plan. Low openings for adjacent buildings are required to be a minimum of 1 foot above the emergency overflow. 3. Based on current HydroCAD model results, lots 27 and 28, block 4 have low floor elevations less than 2 feet above the 100 -year elevation for Pond #1. Please clarify. 4. Based on current HydroCAD model results, lots 16 -21, block 4 have low floor elevations less than 2 feet above the 100 -year elevation for Infiltration Pond #2. Please clarify. 5. Based on current HydroCAD model results, lot 33, block 1 has a low floor elevation less than 2 feet above the 100 -year elevation for Pond #3. Please clarify. 6. Based on current HydroCAD model results, lots 13, 16, and 18, block 1 have low floor elevations less than 2 feet above the 100 -year elevation for Infiltration Pond #4. Please clarify. 7. Based on current HydroCAD model results, lots 3 -6, block 3 have low floor elevations less than 2 feet above the 100 -year elevation for Pond #6. Please clarify. 8. Based on current HydroCAD model results, lots 1 -9, block 4 have low floor elevations less than 2 • feet above the 100 -year elevation for Infiltration Pond #7. Please clarify. 9. Determine the 100 -year elevation for the low area upstream of the culvert draining subcatchment P 1- OFF. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Pine Glen Page 2 August 2, 2005 Drainage Calculation Review .City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 10. Provide low opening and low floor elevations for the existing houses along James Street, and houses adjacent to infiltration Pond 2 and the existing low area draining subcatchment P 1 -OFF. 11. Submit the geotechnical report with anticipated high ground water table. Low floor elevations are required to be 4 feet above the high ground water table. 12. Provide test results confirming the infiltration capacity of the proposed infiltration basins. If an infiltration test is not performed, it is recommended that an infiltration value of 0.5 inches per hour (.00069 feet per minute) be used for design as per the RCWD design aide standards for Type A soils. Design the infiltration basin such that the infiltration volume below the outlet, at a minimum, is equal to the runoff volume from a 2.5 -inch storm, and limit the draw -down time to a maximum of two days. 13. The lag/CN method is used to determine the time of concentration based on the hydraulic length and average land slope for an entire watershed. Therefore, it is not recommended that the lag/CN method be used in combination with the TR -55 method for the determination of subcatchment curve numbers. 14. A time of concentration calculation for existing subcatchment 2E -OFF does not appear to be included in the submittal. Please submit time of concentration calculations for subcatchment 2E -OFF. 15. Assume Type B soils for all disturbed pervious areas (CN =61). 016. Pond 6 is designed as a wet pond. Therefore, it is preferred that an exfiltration rate not be included in the HydroCAD model. 17. It is recommended that Pond 5 be a minimum of 4 feet deep. 18. The proposed 3" orifice in the Pond 1 outlet structure is not feasible due to a high potential for clogging. It is preferred that a minimum 4" orifice be used. 19. Pond skimmer pipes are required to be a minimum of 12" RCP. 20. It appears that pond outlet 6 is not buildable as depicted. 21. Verify capacity of existing storm sewer along CSAH No. 23. 22. Storm sewers and culverts are required to be a minimum of 15" RCP. 23. A minimum of 2 feet of cover from top of storm sewer pipe to rim of catch basin/manhole is recommended. 24. Pond 1 dead storage volume for elevation 894.5 seems inconsistent with the volume depicted in the HydroCAD model. Please clarify. 25. Will a culvert be required under the trail to drain subcatchment P7 -OFF? 26. Should the note on the Grading Plan for Pond No. 4 read "897.5 place 1 -1/2" rock "? 27. Is Pond 1 contour designations in the Grading Plan correct? 28. Is Pond 6 elevations correct in the `dead storage provided' sheet? 029. Should the area for elevation 894 in the dead storage calculation read 1,800? • • Recommendations of the July 27 2005 Environmental Board Meeting Pine Glen The Environmental Board made the following recommendations: • Significant trees within 50 feet of soil disturbance areas must be identified. • Tree protection fence must be shown around all tree protection areas. • Tree protection fence must be installed before soil disturbance. • The City Native Seed mix should be used in all ponding, drainage, swale, and infiltration areas. • A design should be submitted for water garden area. This should be a formal landscape design • It is requested that additional screening be considered on the Northern part of the development between the development and the existing residential area. Screening is also necessary between the commercial area and the residential area of the development. • A conservation easement should be written for all greenway and wetland areas. Lots on the West side should have this easement in sufficient width to buffer the wetland. • Signs should be placed at all conservation easement/wetland area edges. There should be 1 sign per lot where abutment occurs. • A contract should be acquired with an ecologist, Landscape Company specializing in the establishment and maintenance of native plant establishment. This contract should be approved by the City and extend for at least 3 years to include 1 burn at the end of the contract. • An informational sheet should be distributed to property buyers describing environmental considerations and buffer /conservation areas. • It is suggested that since there will be a homeowners association, there should be some annual dollars allocated to maintain native plant areas, and formal water garden areas. • The Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) should show all required 50 foot entrances. The SWPPP should reiterate seed areas, type of seed and timing issues. A designated place on the site must be indicated where the SWPPP and site inspection sheets will be available for inspection. The SWPPP must show an approved storm water catch basin protection device such as InfraSafe. • The developer would be responsible for escrowing dollars for one city boulevard tree per frontage of each house. • The commercial areas must follow the City lighting Ordinance. LTD ) FILE COPY (rc.UUszsTO T. ,969 Engineering • Planning • Surveying - Landscape Architecture MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Quigley, 23, LLC COPY: FROM: Nick Erpelding, EIT RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES mquigley @emmerich.us nerpelding @rIk - kuusisto.com Vern Swing, PE, Principal Traffic Engineer vswing @rIk - kuusisto.com DATE: July 21, 2005 RE: Preliminary Traffic Impact Assessment Pine Glenn Mixed -Use Development RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2005 -447 -M RLK- Kuusisto has completed a preliminary analysis of traffic impact of the proposed Pine Glen Residential /Commercial mixed -use development in Lino Lake, Anoka County, Minnesota. This memo provides a summary of the assumptions, procedures and results of the preliminary analysis. Introduction 23, LLC proposes to create a 79 -unit single family subdivision with two commercial /retail lots adjacent to County State -Aid Highway (CSAH) 23 (Lake Drive). The total amount of commercial land use expected is 15,000 s.f., all of which is expected to be categorized "Specialty Retail," per the Institute of Transportation Engineers classification scheme. The proposed site is bound on the west by CSAH 23, on the north by existing single family housing and James Street, and on the south by existing single family housing and Lois Lane, extending approximately 3/4 mile to the east of CSAH 23. The site location is illustrated on Figure 1, "Vicinity Map." All figures and tables are included at the end of this memo. Access to the site is proposed via one primary entrance, and connections for three future secondary accesses are planned. The primary entrance, on CSAH 23, is assumed to handle all of the traffic from the development. Of the secondary accesses one providing for a future connection to Dupont Avenue approximately one - quarter mile east of CSAH 23 while the other two are at the far east end of the property; one connecting to Lois Lane on the south and one Offices: Hibbing Minnetonka • Ham Lake • Twin Ports (952) 933 -0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (952) 933-1153 Equal Opportunity Employer • • Mike Quigley July 21, 2005 providing for a future connection to James Street on the north. Figure 2, "Concept Site Plan," gives a detailed look at the proposed site. For the purposes of this study, one design year was considered, 2005. Two scenarios were considered, an Existing scenario, or operations as they currently exist, and a Build scenario, or operations with the addition of site - generated traffic. In discussions with Anoka County, four intersections were targeted for study and have been included in the study area: > CSAH 23 and County Road 14 (Main Street) > CSAH 23 and the site access (Street A) > CSAH 23 and the Southbound Interstate 35W (I -35W) Ramps > CSAH 23 and the Northbound I -35W Ramps Existing Conditions The existing conditions of the nearby roadway system were documented by a field inventory conducted by RLK on July 20, 2005. In addition, manual turning movement count data was collected from Anoka County and MnDOT documenting existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study area intersections. Since only 2003 turning movement data were available, a growth factor was applied to the data to arrive at assumed 2005 Existing traffic volumes. The growth factor was calculated from MnDOT ADT traffic data collected in the area from year 2000 -2004. Based on review of the MnDOT ADT count data, a 3.0% background growth rate was used. Figure 3 provides an overview of the existing (2005) peak hour traffic volumes at the study area intersections. Anoka County/MnDOT are currently planning to improve the I -35 CSAH 23 interchange. Current plans call for year 2007 construction. Capacity improvements to the interchange have not been considered for this analysis in accordance with choosing 2005 as the design year. Anoka County has no current plans to improve the intersection of CSAH 23 / Cty. Road 14, which currently operates as an all -way stop, through the year 2009. Trip Generation / Distribution / Assignment The number trips to be generated by the proposed development was estimated for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, as well as on a daily basis using the data and methodologies contained in the 7th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). To ensure a conservative analysis, no pass -by or shared trip reduction was taken. The estimated number of site - generated trips is summarized in Table 1. RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Page 2 of 5 Pine Glen Mixed -Use G:\23 LLC\2005- 447- M \traffic\report\TIS memo 07- 21- 05.doc 2005 -447 -M • • Mike Quigley Table 1 Trip Generation Est>Imatest' July 21, 2005 Land Use ITE Code Size AM Enter AM Exit PM Enter PM Exit Daily Total Single Family Residential 210 79 homes 15 44 50 30 756 Specialty Retail Lot 1 814 5,000 s.f. 3 3 6 8 222 Specialty Retail Lot 2 814 10,000 s.f. 5 5 12 15 443 Totals • th 23 52 68 53 1,421 75 121 . Data from Trip Generation, 7 Edition The distribution of site - generated traffic from and to the adjacent street system was based on existing traffic patterns. Trips added due to site - generated traffic were assigned based on these distribution percentages. Figure 4, titled "Trip Distribution & Assignment," illustrates the distribution pattern and the estimated change in peak hour traffic volumes within the study area expected as a result of the proposed development. Figure 5 shows the resulting Build scenario peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Operations Operations within the study area were analyzed using the industry- current Synchro /SimTraffic 6 software package, which use the data and methodology contained in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board. The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as roadways, traffic signals and stop - controlled intersections, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical capacity of a facility to the actual traffic volumes on that facility. Various factors affect capacity, including travel speed, roadway geometry, grade, number and width of travel lanes, and intersection control. The current standards for evaluating capacity and operating conditions are contained in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. The procedures describe operating conditions in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). Operations are given letter designations with "A" representing the best operating condition and "F" representing the worst. Generally, Level of Service "D" represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour. Results of the operational analyses for 2005 Existing PM peak hour conditions show that the south intersection within the I -35W /CSAH 23 interchange operates at an overall failing level of service with the eastbound approach also at a failing level of service and long queues. As noted above, MnDOT and Anoka County plan to improve the I -35 W /CSAH 23 interchange in 2007. Since any improvement or mitigation measure implemented at the interchange prior to that time would be removed, only temporary improvements with minimal cost are likely to provide any net benefit. RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Page 3 of 5 Pine Glen Mixed -Use G:\23 LLC\2005- 447- M \traffic\report\T1S memo 07- 21- 05.doc 2005 -447 -M • • Mike Quigley July 21, 2005 Although not likely to be implemented, a "With Mitigation" scenario was analyzed to assess what the benefits would be if the intersections within the interchange were signalized. An analysis was also conducted to determine the benefit of converting to all -way stop control at both intersections, but this option resulted in no improvement to overall intersection LOS. Results of the operational analyses also show that the intersection of CSAH 23 / Cty. Road 14 operates at an overall failing level of service and with failing levels of service on two approaches during the PM peak period. Since no improvements are currently budgeted by Anoka County at the CSAH 23 / Cty. Road 14 intersection as noted above, the "As Is" analysis looked at what might happen if the project were to proceed with the intersection operating in its present condition. However, the "With Mitigation" scenario examined conditions with the intersection signalized assuming minimal adjustment of the roadway configuration and striping. Detailed results of both the "As Is" and "With Mitigation" operational analyses for all study area intersections are provided in Table 2. It is noted that a signal warrant analysis was conducted by Anoka County at the time turning movement counts were conducted. Anoka County found that the intersection met one of the MnMUTCD signal warrants (the peak hour warrant, for the PM peak hour). The warrant analysis was updated by RLK using 2005 traffic volumes (assuming 3.0% annual growth since 2003. The results show that again only the peak hour warrant is satisfied. Although an intersection must typically satisfy more than one of the volume warrants (8 -hour, 4 -hour, peak hour) to be considered a candidate for signalization, Anoka County has noted that improvements at the intersection will be needed relatively soon. Based on the limited amount of right -of -way available at the intersection, large -scale capacity improvements are not within their current budget, however. For the Build scenarios, a similar approach (with both "As Is" and "With Mitigation" scenarios) was taken. Discussions with Anoka County suggest that in order to accommodate site - generated traffic at the site access intersection (CSAH 23 and Street A), both right and left turn lanes be added. Anoka County's standard turn lane length is 300 feet plus 15:1 taper for 50 mph design speed roadways. Accordingly construction of a 300' southbound left turn lane and 300' northbound right turn lane are suggested, and were assumed in the analysis. It is noted that Anoka County does hope to extend the 4 -lane section of CSAH 23 northward in the future. Currently the 4 -lane section extends just beyond Marketplace Drive, the northern of the two accesses to the Super Target/Kohl's development in the northeast quadrant of the I- 35 W /CSAH 23 interchange. If and when the 4 -lane section extends to Street A, the turn lanes suggested by Anoka County to accommodate the development will need to be removed and replaced. In order to minimize the amount of roadway that will need to be replaced, it is suggested that a southbound bypass lane be considered in place of a full southbound left turn lane with speed:1 transition and 15:1 taper. Although Anoka County's past experience has shown that bypass lanes tend to violate driver expectation, that assumption holds true primarily for high speed rural roadways. As development proceeds in the area, a reduction in speed from 50 mph to 30, 35 or 40 mph may be warranted, leading to the possibility that a southbound bypass lane will be the ideal temporary solution at Street A. RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Page 4 of 5 Pine Glen Mixed -Use G: \23 LLC \2005 - 447- M \traffic\report\TIS memo 07- 21- 05.doc 2005 -447 -M • • Mike Quigley July 21, 2005 In addition to adding turn lanes at Street A, it is suggested that Anoka County require the future relocation of Vicki to match with Street A. Based on the distance between the two, RLK confirms that at the time development on the west side of CSAH 23 proceeds, realignment of Vicki to match opposite Street A should take place to provide the safest intersection in terms of driver expectation. With the addition of site - generated traffic, levels of service and queues remain nearly identical at the other three study area intersections. Based on this result, no additional mitigation, beyond the turn lanes /bypass lane and possible future relocation of Vicki Lane opposite Street A is warranted to accommodate site - generated traffic. Again, Table 2, included after the text of this memo, provides complete results of all operational analyses. Conclusions and Recommendations The average delay per vehicle, along with the corresponding level of service and queuing at each of the three major study area intersections, were nearly identical between the Existing and Build scenarios, regardless of whether the "As Is" or "With Mitigation" scenario is chosen. Based on this result, the only mitigation measures suggested are those that will provide capacity and enhanced safety for site - generated traffic at the site Access (Street A): ➢ The addition of a northbound 300' right turn lane ➢ The addition of a southbound 300' left turn or bypass lane ➢ Consideration of future realignment of Vicki Lane to match opposite Street A at time development occurs west of CSAH 23 Thank you for the opportunity to address your traffic engineering concerns. We will continue to work with Anoka County to resolve the issue of whether a southbound bypass lane will be acceptable at Street A as an interim solution. If you have any questions please call Nick Erpelding or Vern Swing at 952- 933 -0972. RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. Page 5 of 5 Pine Glen Mixed -Use G: \23 LLC\2005- 447- M \traffic\report\TIS memo 07- 21- 05.doc 2005 -447 -M © 2005 RLK— Kuusisto, LTD. 4 PINE R\ \\\ \R \\\ R\ COLUMBUS TOWNSHIP 2000 POP. 3,957 ST. 0 PINE ST. \\\ \\\ \\\ \\N. \R \R \\\ \\\ \ \\ '~^I 133rd ul AVE. ANDALL ST. 135th AVE. \\ \\\ R\ \R \R \\\ \\7 -\FK 3 >ORANGE S7 NE. DIANE ST. LINO LAKES 2000 POP. �e 16,791 -` AIN 0 VICKI" / LA VICKY 79th ST LA. E ST 0 ST. 4, w EVERGREEN AIN ST 04 0 RONIEAU elet ST. V. JAMES APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION LA $ 3 BARBARA LA CARL INC LA GREENWOOD LA. PRAIRIE VIEV PL. 0 OAK LA 42 g DR, P/ PALOMINOS LA. AS S7 77th ST. ST, LA 42 OR. 53 ST. 7 VE N 5 3S MET ST. MINNESOTA CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES CONNIE LA. 74th 5 u APOLLO DR. 77. RED CLOVER LA 92. CINNAMONTEAL CT. 93. VILLOV PONDI TR ELM- ST. f; t J raem ., LAKE la LA 1V LA DR 8 RICE CREEK - CHAIN OF LAKES r ST. VE N AVE. VLLDTLOVE OR. 0.AD STONE CDR. Li MI GLEN VIEVAVE.� PARK VIEV DR. 0 ,1 SANDPIPER' REGIONAL PAR DR' SI `\\\ I 1 \1 \\\11 RESERVE lA T'C Crr\\\( //(// �— DR(1.IF!`T I /It, AMA!, O N N ANOKA COUNTY CITY OF UNO LAKES RTK CERIZEZEZED Phone: (952) 033 -0972 Paz: (952) 033 -1153 wnw.rlk_kuueie to. com 5110 Blue Circle Dr.* Suite /!1004 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Duluth, MN Ham Lake, MN Hibbing, MN Minnetonka, PINE GLEN VICINITY MAP 0 1 2 SCALE IN MILES FIGURE 1 DATE 7/21 /05 • • C\I a PINE GLEN 0 0 Z71 N z —J a_ CONCEPT SITE POd aPS loaolroo - zo\sa, 6,A.0 ..!d\eu!puad\.1 spot,. wets:, SOOZ 'OZ © 2005 RLK — Kuusisto, LTD. x X M7 O 4) u APOLLO DR V SE sA• NA tr --a .e 27 X155 388 4J 4 I 4-142 95 COLUMBUS TOWNSHIP 2000 POP. 3,957 S1 118 36- t t co t.0 139 234-0 N M m 60 477 -134 82 4-2 2 :83 50 0 t N CO ST. ANDALL S1, `1\ . ANDALL • ' �1 NO LAKES' 3\ POP. S R I�"' �• mr \ 135 PINE ST. i ▪ 133rd u l AWE. >O ORANGE ST NE. MAPLE ST. DIANE ST. 4 LA p . VOODDUCK EVERGREEN ST. LEGEND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES XXX EXISTING STOP CONTROL EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL S O < RA a u MAIN ST. 0 3 RONDEAU Ist S7. V. LA 1.015 LA ST. OAK LA. 8 E. OS ID 07 M CO 329 188- 1 1 201 85- 8 \ GREENWOOD LEA PRAIRIE VIE THOMAS ST. \, ST. PL. 77th ST OAK LA. BARBARA LA 77 ST. Os a INNESOTA CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES 1 rENIt9 VE tin - O 77. RED CLDVER LA. r. 92. CDeUMONTEAL 0. 0I 93. WILLOW PONDS TR. Ma ELM' ST. � N' CV a 91. Q VE MI IV 0 Gt EN SRI J LA EVE p VLLDTL� 0R N WE N GLAO ST NE CI . .ri a GLEN VIEVAVE.�, AVE . II :" PARN VI V DR. 8 E In >< 23 CO DR. d g O V7 3' O O pJ�. CV �2� A,L CV sS LA. i `H 4 5 SANDP DR. SHADOW C1. Ric Lake RICE CREEK - CHAIN OF LAKES r S7. ER REGIONAL PAR RESERVE P z VI 1-7 s--1 411 11011 2 SCALE IN MILES RLK YI, 6110 Blue Circle Dr.* Duluth, MN Ham lake, MN Hibbing, HN Minnetonka, MN Phone: 062 933 -0872 Paz: 952) 933 -1153 www. rl k -kuu e i e to. co m Suite 1100e Minnetonka, MN 55343 PINE GLEN 2005 EXISTING TRAFFC VOLUMES rFlGURE # 3 DATE 7/21 /05 © 2005 RLK— Kuusisto, LTD. M 4- 2 7 COLUMBUS TOWNSHIP 2000 POP. 3,957 ST. 14 ANDALL ST. ANDALL N. 6~` �DOQa POP, Ib.; �2 7 • f t CARL 10, 0, liJ PINE ST. ... \ \\ N.\ \C. \.. \.. ,9 133rd u l AVE. {� 1t jORANGE ST R 3 MAPLE ST. 5166E ST. NO LAKES 6•r ST. 204 MAIN STS LEGEND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AAA PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES EXISTING STOP CONTROL EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL PROPOSED STOP CONTROL DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE EVERGREEN TR. d t ST. V. \„_ VOODDIL LA VICKY LA. LA. J ST. SHE THOMAS ST 6 E 0 E 0 x X j 0 o+ V O r` 00 0 J 0 20. 2005 9:58pm MINNESOTA CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES 77. RED CLOVER LA. . 92. CDJMAMONTEAL CT. 93. WILLOW PONDS TR 93. ig ELM. ST, ..1 J g)$ 8 Pt � S na LA 8 8 aim o ° ; - G nR b • C1R DR STONE CI . VIEVAVEQ VIEW DR. AVE. st LA. RICE CREEK - CHAIN OF LAKES r ST. REGIONAL PAR RESERVE SANDP(- ER OR. SHADOW$ C3. Ricee_ake R nn (a 1 t}r ,nor 0 1/2 SCALE IN MILES RIK 8110 Blue Circle Dr.• Suite 4100• Minnetonka, MN 55343 Duluth, MN Hem Lake, MN Hibbing, MN Minnetonka, MN Phone: (952) 933 -0972 Fax: (952) 933 -1153 www. rlk— kuusieto. com PINE GLEN FlG4 / 4 TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT 7/21/05 © 2005 RLK— Kuusisto, LTD. 1 1 LEGEND AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES EXISTING STOP CONTROL EXISTING SIGNAL CONTROL PROPOSED STOP CONTROL s- to t-8 27 co rn D 4-155 366 r j '#, 4-144 102 118 36-* 41 t 1► 139 234 — rn 74 51-.4 N c0 N 7 IM 4) + jl 1-136 89 4-2 2 50 COLUMBUS TOWNSHIP 2000 POP. 3,957 ST. \ \. \ \N. '\.\ \.. ANDALL S1. ST. ANDALL PINE ST. \ \\ \.. \S, \\` c^i Inrtl ii AVE. >ORANGE ST MAPLE ST DIANE ST. LINO LAKES", 7 If+POP LA. 5<a VOODDuC VICK 8 ST 37 \\ EvERGREEN MAIN ST DE AU elst ST. V. LA.VICKY LA. LA. 9th ST LS 356 197-* 1 1 201 857 MINNESOTA CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES VE VE. 77. RED CLOVER LA. t. 9R. CINNAMONTEAL CT. 90. WILLOW PONDS TR ELM St. ?l 6 o t 9 a31 CD„. d � -2 d8 '11 S SUN FLOW LA KE1 REE 4 LA. ER DR rc VILDFL DR. u W GLAD STONE W W ae GLEN VIEVAVE.L. PARK VIEW DR. K �z < R. d Y —� N V LA vE. RICE CREEK - CHAIN OF LAKES F ST. SAN REGIONAL PART 1 DR RESERVE Pi SHADOW CT. 1) 0 N Ric Lake At LA. CM RUC Callia&MID Phone: (952) 933-0972 Fax: (952) 933-1153 5110 Blue Circle Dr.* Suite #100e Minnetonka, MN 55343 0 1 2 SCALE IN MILES Duluth, MN Ham Lake, MN Hibbing, MN Minnetonka, MN PINE GLEN 2005 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES rFlGURE # 5 DATE 7/21 /05 Mike Quigley • Table 2. Intersection Level of Service and Queue Overview Level of Service by Movement, Overall Intersection LOS & 95th Percentile Queues in feet July 21, 2005 Scenario: Mitigation: Intersection: As Is (No AM O = 2005 Existing Mitigation) PM O O With Mitigation AM O ^1 PM CII 0 O As Is (No AM z B 0 G 2005 Mitigation) PM z 0 Build With Mitigation AM 0 O a PM O = a C EB b 100 c 116 C 148 C 125 b 108 c 163 C 153 C 146 v WB c 97 f f 1094 C 100 C 308 c 111 f 1225 f 511 C 113 D 372 NB rq a 51 472 B 49 C 372 C 175 b 46 B 57 C 353 a U SB b 80 c 95 B 121 ' b 84 c 105 B 135 C 189 Overall b f C C b f C C WB Z n/a b 43 c 43 b 42 c 46 P cii NB ' M SB a h a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 4 a 23 a 4 a 7 U Overall a a a a c 86 e 51 A 70 B 53 c 79 e 53 A 68 B 61 & 1 -3 h Ran Z WI a 111 a 103 A 91 A 164 a 121 a 107 A 95 A 186 a 3 a 0 A 70 A 61 a 1 a 0 A 70 A 107 a a A A a a A A e 115 f 781 B 104 B 236 e 143 a 0 a 41 f 782 a 0 B 112 C 247 a 0 a 0 A 59 B 315 A 64 B 315 23 (Soul oa a 26 a 144 A 95 A 266 a 145 A 112 B 519 b f A B b f A B Notes: 1. Levels of Service based on 2000 Highway Capacity Manual methods. 2. Lower case letters represent Levels of Service at unsignalized intersections. 3. 95th percentile queue lengths are based on an average of 5 SimTRAFFIC simulation runs. RLK- Kuusisto. Ltd. G:\23 LLC\2005- 447- 1Atraffic \tables \LOS 07 -20 -05 Pine Glen Mixed -Use 2005 -447 -M ( �KUUSIST( LTD ) Engineering • Planning • Surveying - Landscape Architecture MEMORANDUM RECFI FD AUG 259''15 TO: Mike Quigley, 23, LLC CITY OF LnvO LAKES COPY: FROM: Nick Erpelding, EIT Vern Swing, PE, Principal Traffic Engineer DATE: August 24, 2005 RE: Response to Comments on Preliminary Pine Glenn Mixed -Use Development RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2 One comment regarding the proposed development in Lino Lakes, Minnesota h ;•een County. The primary focus of the comm Lois Lane, a residential street locate.'. t to is intended to address this comme mquigley @emmerich.us nerpelding@rIk-kuusisto.com vswing@rIk-kuusisto.com ffic Impact Assessment tial /Commercial mixed -use from : - a residents and from Anoka question what the possible effects to roposed site, might be. This memo Impacts to Lois Lane Access to the site was pro the far east end of the site wa was to provide multiple access within the development in the event ry entrance. A secondary access to Lois Lane on 'd= The primary intent of creating this second access llow emergency vehicles to gain access to residences ain access should become blocked. As noted in the Preliminary Traffic Impact Assessment, all of the "everyday" traffic generated by the development was assumed to use the primary access on County Road 23. This assumption was made in order to look at a worst -case scenario of operations at the main site access. The results of the analysis showed that even with all site - generated traffic using the main access, the access would operate at an acceptable level of service, with short delays and minimal queuing. Logically, traffic will tend to use the quickest route from its origin to its destination. Most of the time, the quickest route (in terms of time) will also be the shortest route (in terms of distance). However, in some cases, the choice of a longer route will save time. Offices: Hibbing • Minnetonka Ham Lake - Twin Ports (952) 933 -0972 61 10 Blue Circle Drive Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (952) 933-1153 Equal Opportunity Employer • Mike Quigley August 24, 2005 Based on the results of the Preliminary Traffic Impact Assessment, the shortest route in this case does also appear to be the quickest route. Therefore, the assumption that all site - generated traffic will use the main access instead of Lois Lane is appropriate. Based on review of the concept site plan, the possibility does exist that roughly four or five of the lots on the extreme east end of the site may perceive Lois Lane to be the shorter route geometrically. In that case, the trips generated by these lots (approximately one per lot during the peak hour) might use Lois Lane. Based on an estimated 70 residential lots along Lois Lane, the estimated peak hour traffic volume of Lois Lane is 70 vehicles. Adding five vehicles to the existing 70 vehicles would result in a 7% increase in peak hour traffic. From the results of the Preliminary Traffic Impact Assessment, Street A which will carry nearly twice the volume peak hour traffic, is not expected to incur operational difficulties. Even with a 7% increase, Lois Lane traffic volume would be considerably less than that expected for Street A. Accordingly, the small increase would not be expected to be detrimental to either the operations or safety of Lois Lane, and in practice would hardly be noticeable. Conclusions The secondary access to Lois Lane was provided in emergency vehicles. During normal operations, howe path to its destination. Based on the result noted i that operations at main site access on County R queuing and that use of the main access p vide County Road 23, impacts to Lois Lane ar vehicles and conceivably a handful of residen allow flexibility of access for c will tend to follow the quickest ry Traffic Impact Assessment table in terms of delay and nest ` " > in terms of distance to e limited to rare use by emergency east end of the proposed site. RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Page 2 of 2 G:\23 LLC\ 2005 - 447 -M \traffic \report\Response to Comments 08- 24- 05.doc RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES Pine Glen Mixed -Use 2005 -447 -M KUUSISTO Lin ) 4 Engineering - Planning Surveying - Landscape Architecture MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Bengston, City of Lino Lakes COPY: Mike Quigley, 23, LLC FROM: Nick Erpelding, EIT Vern Swing, PE, Principal Traffic Engineer DATE: September 8, 2005 RE: Response to Additional Traffic Comme Pine Glenn Mixed -Use Development RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2 Several additional comments regarding the pro use development in Lino Lakes, Minneso the additional comments received. Comment: Please address number of trips that could south. This will address th RECEIVED SEP 0 8 2005 w CITY OF LINO LAKES paul.bengtson@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us mquigley @emmerich.us nerpelding@rIk-kuusisto.com vswing@rIk-kuusisto.com Gl idential /Commercial mixed - eived. ► is memo addresses each of uth through the existing development as a or a % of the number of trips that would go thoroughly. Response: As addressed in the "Based on review of the conc`pt site plan, the possibility does exist that roughly four or five of the lots on the extreme east end of the site may perceive Lois Lane to be the shorter route geometrically. In that case, the trips generated by these lots (approximately one per lot during the peak hour) might use Lois Lane. Based on an estimated 70 residential lots along Lois Lane, the estimated peak hour traffic volume of Lois Lane is 70 vehicles [per ITE]. Adding five vehicles to the existing 70 vehicles would result in a 7% increase in peak hour traffic." In addition, as a percentage of site - generated traffic, five trips equates to at most 4.1%. Offices: Hibbing • Minnetonka • Ham Lake • Twin Ports (952) 933 -0972 • 6110 Blue Circle Drive • Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (952) 933-1153 Equal Opportunity Employer • • • Paul Bengston September 8, 2005 Comment: Also address the reduction of the number of proposed lots from 78 to 72 as is shown on the revised site plan. Response: A reduction in the number of units from 78 to 72 will result in approximately 5% fewer trips being generated by the site, as a whole. The number of trips choosing to use Lois Lane, while expected to be zero, is dependent on how close to the east end of the development the particular lot that generates the trip is located. Reducing the total number of lots from 78 to 72 should not change the number of lots near the east end of the development and therefore will likely not affect the number of trips made to the south. Comment: The memo should have a traffic generation map attached to it. Response: Please refer to the original Traffic Impact Study (dated July 21, 2005) for the Trip Distribution figure. Comment: 1 think the impact to Lois Lane will . • hg er th. t 7% stated during the peak hour. 1 think some drivers will use Lois Lane a s . ay i o ` .e commercial area to the south. Response: Drivers will likely choose this consideration it is unlikely that the south, as stated in the August 24 Further, if, using a differe indeed choose to use Lois La the Lois Lane neighborhood will in net zero impact. shortest travel time. Based on ane to access commercial areas to tvers from the proposed development do the south, it is just as likely that drivers from d Street A to access areas to the north, resulting Comment: I agree that the two roads need to be connected for emergency vehicles, school busses ect. Two long dead ends are not in the best interest of the residents or the City. Response: Agreed. RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Page 2 of 2 G: \23 LLC \2005- 447- M\traftic \report\Response to Additional Comments 09- 08- 05.doc RECEIVED SEP 0 8 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES Pine Glen Mixed -Use 2005 -447 -M o N. Caw. Aa173176172117 / 3.7267/2 MA P • GRAPHIC SCALE 1 10 7437 1 (nob • 700 n. PINE GLEN PRELIMINARY PLAT for 23, LLC. e4. James I F 1,` ( 1 ::,: y 4 -4,.1 4 X40 X4 ' ' )4X4 4 ;04( 47444 $" 198. te k _, ' e l 0 702 Street I :lo OWNER AND SUBDIVIDER: ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: 23, LLC 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, NN. 55304 (763) 755 -655A L5.1 ENGINEERING INC. 4875 STATION PARRR'AY NW, ANDOVER, MN. 55304 (783) 862 -J281 Mlar•r Land Surveyor. t 4 Clvli 5n965een Inc. 710 Eaal River Road Anoka, Mn. 55303 (763) 772 -8099 I\ %' i i 4R /% / I r`�d .065/7 tam P AS 4NX 9 Mena Ca CM. Ate= 1/4 Cana 5009,13007.1, PROPOSED LOTS: Props..' Zoning • 51 5659(9 Family Lam • 78 Average Lot Ana a 78.458 S.F. Density: Loh Per Acre • 0.88 Commercial Loh 2 To1a1 Area = 2.08 Acres 514. Art0 = 68.46 Ae07 U0!and Arm: • 44.78 Acres Welland Area = 23.88 Acre. 01411011 - 25.83 Acres (CO■MON AREA n 28.13 Aarep �70ER� • � h 5.89 °32'09ifq„. 12...; 314.85;' IAY4 4 471 11.550 5f. i 55.485 F. 20 )14,001 Si. /71.595 37., .635 Sr 11,477 511 o l - - - - --- PROPOSED I COMMERCIAL AREA 501.4r1 =MT 0121.505 S.T. x 34 2 19.39557. 32,935 5F. 4 0,: 1(18010 SS 10.80!0 S/, uP3 0072.7 0.145.1 3407.: N. OUTI,OT A 'A "2'd3ffp6nf= p•-=Arehne (Unopend).' MS 25770 P DESCRIPTION 2 I /r • N.X.. Iee.,. ___N8973'O 'W faNiwln1 4.6 17 (07006F_ inYosd•L • .?.=% � �N N2rNfINf01.lJ /ffIXUNINJIItJI 20 10.600 5.7 • 4: w 3707 -52 10054:m. As ■ crowned Flo No ]0737053 o w Line 765. ivoeco 0a 785. Pen-we A 740•1 Pal of Lots 5 ono 0. 40°48501 5ubdw5an Na 105 And.. Counlo 840.sola 771,4 5.1.01„ of 1. WORN, 0080.0. lore' C0r.orncem r of ono Lot 3 name S 5 344ly on Inc Carl Ih, of m5u maw S. 5.30 1401. 01 tire punt or .reinµ .e Pas ev, of 10 nem cop., 153. foe, ma* a su, 16617meatmy lire of said Let 50*OIten S0n880 (41y 64,6 0f Nay /iw or 953 5061 .no 10. t Nalna mw ah0 lie 1000x8 01 0 ✓M Warr t lee SOUf..1 • s' la, 4 01 a e Dr e1 .ea.ea, 19 nowt , 30 emends. ...awed Iron N3N10 10 Wald. to Ua Peel., Ova of soil Let 4 030 (Afro of MMO 1001, Highway RigYel of Rby 7(01 Ha 77.1000 53,047. pbt 00 0000 Aannrcolos la Pare Test Sat of 10. Soot. MO or 1. North... Wale. sf (9e N01... . of 5341043 9. 00.40404 31. Rano, 22. Moho E4un10 LN.os°la 1 Q. E.t.n a0 5 .e"ry of .e Nom 735 Nei or IM Woe 32450 fool Ea1xlyyof tot E.l.11y.,e of Aneho County 109740, RIP,t -OFNap Tel No 17. 00030in9 en U,S. 0.57151,11.1 nl 5 'o. AMMO 55.15574117 t 75e South 4101 of 10. aloe.? [Mater of .e 0a10se2 Doom of Sena. 9. lo.n.51p 340 R.. 22, 000 503405 A00010. Inc S.Im Hal of 740E 50/104311 Dunne" of the 1vmlml Duane" of Section 9, 1aw440p 31. Rano* 22, 6500 C0,1010 *003•10 The Soon 097 of I. N0001.0.1 Cooler of 100 Naln..t 00or7N of Soelon Easter, 137 14653371005E 22, *0010 C0415 404.14 205070 Ine AliMv /, SITE 1•`- - - - -1 ( 1 -"' ",1 1 _ 1 I ----r1::::1. - - -• - -. 1' __1_-_- ____.�- --- I 1 _ 1 1 "F -1 ,..fit 1 1 i 1,'1 ,I' _ I I I 1 MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM AREA: 10.800 Sq.fl. MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 80 Feat C iron? building .e8OSak One 110 Foot. Corner Mal 651910.014 DEPTH 135 For BUILDING SETBACKS: 30 Fool Front 35 Foot Reor 10 Feel Side Sinel LEOENQ 507(0705 MDDi Or %ELAND 115 Far AflaoM4 Oara a "- AS 15*10 1.717 10 9 T 55014045 *IED BI NTI VICINTIY MAP NOT '70 SCALE ' r Y' .1 1.4Mh9 Tee LN. au❑ 31650106. or 2011, f Awe -- lase -- 2 f.f Cant., mtem. - -ION -- 10 ram C.100, Ntxp - a- 000.00 7rbnenavan LNe - 0.0.00 UIOTy LNe 755551. Spar 000101 1ain 700.000. [ran 5.9. 0004, Polo ® w5.• -ta)- f+ SANITARY Mtn 3 fx P.I751661.2 u TX 57010■8 5(300 eQ DENOTES 007. 80RIN0 8Y STS CONSULTANTS, MC. DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING DE1401E5 DEIER510d POND / I 4_-. ` I r 04`31 1 _L_ Lois - "I0 30' 77051 SETBACK LINE 11 DENOTES 1101 NUMBER 22.551 4F.�� 0050105 LOT AREA (14930 t?.).� ^ DOORS 107 AREA 01190E 19149415900 4110E14E8E , -- ___1,_ _____J / l' �'. 1 Lane I I 1 1 1 ESNOTE5 4157111 AT 1R0NT 5013A04 DENOTES Pm AREA 50' k 57 WOINDU01 NOUSE 924,5 NAT VLSI DENOTES 11P101 ORNNACE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS 5' a UNLESS 0174ERMEE 440021 _ - ON THE PLAN. DENOTES 8' .000 CHIP TRAIL TYPICAL LOT DETAIL NOT TO 501E 1 i I I 1,01.33 f -. I hereby eedify 1001 1(118 survey, plan en report NOS prepared by me Or under my direct supereis0n oo0 That 1 am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the lawn of the stale • Of MiMSShca. 6loh0 L Row. Reg. NO. I.2) -_ Dale 1 end Surveyors & CIA/ Enginema, Ino. --.._.. Mi 191 MIDWEST OUTLOT C 0 rt ! I mo 1 Ake Xd 10v102.- s.1A -rte. -=.__ awe a• HT'1X0 ' I 0••••••••• Loa 31,3.,0., hens beuw. P.. - Y 1811401 N...L 1 , i\I R • u6 "PP.-- 5.F 711 i \ 1401E1 1.) ALL EXISTING ON SITE BUILDINGS SKILL BE REMOVED PER CRT REQUIREMENTS. 2.) OUTLOT5 WILL BE MAINTAINED BY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC, AND BE COVERED 8E DRAINAGE t UTILDT EASEMENT. 5.9 02.085 7HIW // 1/ //) / 1 ( ik,s. // / • - // / � / OWNER AND -Y / SUBDIVIDER: T /( / / 1 `/ / /\a / / �" '/n, / f) '7/1.4'. / /L 1 - 17 / 1 -- ENGINEER: Alf COMPANIES, INC. 7873 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (78.!) 755 -6550 LS! £NOINE0RINO, INC. 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 05304 (763) 862 -3281 PINE GLEN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN for 23, LLC. James Street A°- 1•t �J' 0(11 (0101' AREA. ¢a 1 \ / \111100857.5 `AI tt 15024.6 897.7 I < 1 I: < - P0ND#3- NW1 =896.5 - -_1YR =896.6 (T. 00(2510110 EDFµ1 OVER fl / P0NOp5 __iwL 5410/4. 1111.1104.7 10111.-905.2 100YR =905.8 NAP 1A./;ream soot., e'A'.:� PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AREA �1 PRE591RE 1A? w /B• 15.V Ire 2' X r 1APPWC 10.EDE. dit 11� .nom..._. MOO nelp 1 OUTLO :iJOp0n'(`_ - venue 1 (Unopened), m vaj.`i evv ;rJh'+ -rirnii 'PONDp6�".I."'�rv'�YTj'Y'° R 0._986 II/ II2W YR -904.0 .0 I k, .Il 10= 901.11 ` j 1D5TR 10=90a.@ E t1U5'L'O,T'<t�. t I irgLITVIOILAREA E7 'I1 fIR Pc1RD-E I lE- _ _ liR =907.0 . i1OTR=907.00II fT' j (0070 =907b 1 I r (_(...no -- -1• _ fi i' h' --1------- --t- -- -1- L_.A- - - --1- - a;__ - -_ 1 1 - 1 -1 - -- - -J-. - I .- 1 _ I (1 1,/ - - -- ...1 -- E; `I_ I I I "--- '�'• --- -- � Dupor? t ------ - A*erro6r:'(ili>bpened), Lois STANDARD STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE L_ 5/0 ed 2.010 1-1/0 .10001 0001 WC NO 00111054 00001 47357 0011■15075 1030 COA1 7' .Mar +'2331 Wt012 COUR= a` 02/001 C.L. E W01 SLUM d1iANUrAfr BAff VV... =LION DEPENDENT Ow MG C0101110N5) 0-712 00NCRE10 CURB k =r1170 I 1 -- ___ -.�_ __�__- .AR100Yk =806.6 I - -a -- J----- -...1' I I 1 il• I I 1 I I =;E !r1 .1 \.1;;,-„'---„'1 1 Lan e LFGFND ..__. _.__ 001001[9 E0LT Or =LAND A9 OELINEAIED BY 1(Op1000 ENNRa 40(07 AE r' ,,,,(ekrlq )rte Tree 4kNq Mee werj 0004fic ea Ol AAnp -x- fare - -)eM -- % fool 0on1an m.o. - -IMO -- )0 Tpl onreor olrmel -A•- OMepO lanraiaron 11e -ev- poop./ dt0te top 5pol Derek. aLL0 0.ephene fro. n]. 00015 0104 e WWl SANITARY SEWER Ex WATERMAA1 EX 57015 5LWER `0 OENOTE5 ./Alt BCRING B1 575 Ca25UL7AN15, INC. DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING cefi DENOTES WATER GARDEN DENOTES B' WOOD CHIP TRAIL DENOTES EASEMENT MATERIALS: i n SANITARY SEWER - 8" PVC (20035). 0.40. MIN. SLOPE SANITARY SERVICE - 4" PVC (SDR55) WATERMAIN - - -- 8" DIP (CL. 52) WATERMAIN SERVICE - 1" COPPER . STORM SEWER -- RCP NOTES' 1. ALL UTILITIES SHALL 8E 70 CITY OF UNO LAKES STANDARDS. 2. 7.5' MINIMUM COVER ON WATERMA / 3. 10' HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN. 4. SILT FENCE SHALL BE NTSTALLE0 A1100140 ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES LOCATED IN THE REAR YARD AREAS. 5, ALL EA157MC UTILITY ELEVATION SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED. DENOTES PROPOSED WATERMAIN DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER AND CATCH BASIN DENOTES PROPOSED FORCEMAIN GRAPHIC SCALE 1N PITT ) 1 Plea • AD a. ILE 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55304 (763) 862 -3251 I hereby certify th01 this pion, specification or report was 00./00170 by mo 01 under my Oust supervision end that 1 an o duly Licensed Protes.onol Engineer ond.r the lows of the 5101. of Minnesolo. Print Nome: Lovrenee J. Olson 5ignmmr, 9. Date a /YS /oA Regislrolial No. 16753 REHM: 6/9/0/0/00 i-- REc E: . JUL 0 7 2005 ° CETY OF L!N 4 • OWNER AND 5U80MDER: AA COMPANIES, INC. 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55304 (763) 755_6554 ENGINEER: 4.5.1 ENOINEER/N0, /NC. 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55304 (763) 862 -3281 PINE GLEN PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN for 23, LLC. / PANDAS a1WL =Bw.S 1 YR6BD4.7 10115=905,2 100TR =905. James f I 1 Street fl - 1 i L� I 1 (tRAT10N AREA PONO=A3 DRY POND COWL 696_5 p' ' � ,� � 1 e I 1 'i - iD7ReB96,@ Ly+' INFIL •4 1YR =607.5 -10YR =697,7 ROOYF=896.E.- PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AREA moos -r - ovum- OM°. OUTLOT B' i'Op022'('-' -- si,Ivebue (Unopened)/ • • •' Y POND/ I _- NWL7904.0 I1R =904.0 I -- 107569040.1 700TRa94. II I. t� _ ( /x-noa D oriY - A � " '(�Jiybpaned)- INfRRPONrXRE ' m- ,(w- 1 I DOY PON) I ) ...1 ' I' NWL56Dc.5 1 10YRR1P906.5 r'(YPA69t.6% /' ,j- _- _�- ____M,4I OOTRe90fi.8 I I 1 ;'/: 147Rc696.T% 1 14213111,1597.0 -L« J 1 I I '' - I -:T-- :r.. 1 1 >±1 INS I RATIOP:AREA ntas- ys �1 _-'-('IVY 11 1 v..1 I 700711390 )4 10073 =907 I I - �«y____.. - L - - - -- -- -- I I I I 1 11 --- - - - -1 1 1 .1 1, { I `Y r ROCK ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL ®LT FMCS RISTALL ATIOP NOT TO SCALE Lois STANDARD STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE 1-1/2.101001 47341 w0WIINO CPASE 4.,201 0357 7.01NIWous 101.3 COAT S- Iu401 037, 9103* COMIC 01040401 CL. 5 2 • Mn001 SELECT ARANULAR RASE (0 0 017 0 6 11 QCNan DEFENDEN1 ON FEW 00100■0115) D-472 CONCRETE CURB 4 GUTTER Il OUY 4'01 %' Lan e LEGENQ OEN01E5 EDGE OF 07LA110 IS 0D11EAI 91 7.4101210 EMMIIDN1EM21 '''Y'M'1E.hltn2 bee line E.Fatbp Me 3.40 i0 0,:. Bu et Newr rener woe-- 2 Fool Contour Nue* - MAID -10 roof EYn*OU1 mNet. -OF- 0,.00200 kontnvaebn 140 -au- 13446.04 110017 Lie 5pol Ehwlion K'0 7Ne *none 150. A(M4, YWe e 00. SAMI1AR1 SERF* WAi(AWAW Ex 57000 *CER DENOTES SOIL BONING BY 5T5 CON5ULTANT5, INC. L". ;',: DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED CLEARING LIMITS D, wC r-•) ".' DENOTES WATER GARDEN PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED DRNNAOE ROW CGL DENOTES CUSTOM GRADED 501 (9.001 DENOTES PROP0750 SPOT ELEVATION 1�I� DENOTES 0' WOOD ARP TRAL DENOTES EASEMENT 01, 30 FROX1 SEIBACA v;,, h, n _ § 1 _ ]5' REAR 5119505 NE 00 *3A0M0 �F 400001205904 FO - - -1001 950104001 795111- -FULL 9A0MEN1 SPLIT 344«0(11 1000 - -FULL DAS /INT 00.0001 Wit --- 11020ED FULL NASD/ENT 74F3500-10011150 FALL BASEMENT SPLIT w0.«OU1 19600 - MOOED FALL BASEMENT W «DAT SE - - -SRO ENTRY sw0 - -MN ENTRY WAL «WT DENOTES MIYMUM FLOOR ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSED • IXr: ELEVATI N DENOTES PAD ARLA 50' A 125' W p1W*L 001410 GIES MAY may DENOTES TYPICAL ORAWAR AND U11)11 EASEMENTS L0S 11,70. E SHOwn 1 N 114E PLAN. 3010: FULL BA0Ce1FN1 e' FUN DAMOE FLOOR 10 BASEMENT FLOOR IYPICN_ TYPICAL LOT DETAIL NOt TO SCALE 70510351105 55077051 1. INSTAL) SILT FENCE 2. BEGIN SITE GRADING 0. STRIP TOP SOIL 4 0040E SITE TOPSOIL DISTURBED AREAS E. SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS ( MTHIN IA DAYS FROM COMPLETION OF GRADING) A UTILITY CONSTRUCTION 5. SMUT CONSTRUCTION 6 SEED AND MULCH NEWLY DISTURBED AREAS (MTHIN 74 DAYS FROM COMPLETION OF ORADIHC) 7. INDMUUAL BUILDERS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL AND RESTORATION FOR NOME CONSTRUCTION. NOTE, 1. DRAINAGE N UTILITY EASEMENT DYER ALL OF 0UTL0T A. B @ C .- Y>,vvvwv STORM SEWER SILTATION CONTROL NOT 10 SCALE 1 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IR FUT) 7 blob - 200 ft. ININCIWIZEIRESS 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55304 (763) 603 -3261 I hereby Cerlily (1101 this plan, 019oI1iact10n Df report was prep0re0 ay Re or under my 4lreet aupervi01Gn end that 1 an 0 duly Lieene25 Professional Engineer under 1ne toes or 1ne Stole of Minnesota Print Name: Laurence 4. Ohm Signature:,.. r Y Dole ..!L001...... 7100101r01'wn nD 16755 _ REN &0: 0/9/05 JUL 0 7 2005 CP €y OF LINO • • OWNER AND SLIMMER: ENGINEER: AJE COMPANIES, INC. 4875 SlATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 35304 (703) 755-6554 LSJ ENGINEERING, INC. 1876 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 35304 (763) 662-3287 v / ' PINE GLEN STORM SEWER DRAINAGE AREA PLAN for 23, LLC, James PE4.1005 1004004.7 10004905.2 100104905.5 IHIP:477.77 J//I INFILTRATION AREA #A DRY POND Al 110=897.5 ..10T9=597.7 i'DOMAAS Street n I matt., / I • ! / r fr -------- ---- .55 -Si c "4-orrprarr...--‘1 venue ---- OUTLOT B1 Unopened) ..... N94.18904.0 I , , 1 104904.0 I I „, DOTR=SMI4.5 0YR=B04.1, tr" \ \ I I\ \ I I 1 „---k•ss,„\:t.--., ) 'or \ ' romoarAwfildWerIGIAMIL:le 0131'1:01`-;e\ INFL RATIO V \ \I 0090E414 \ -------- I I I I yi ) I ---------------- I I I 1/1 1 \ / ' / Lois Lane 1 I it 11111 STANDARD STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE 0/0 013. 15' L 1-1/5...1101 52341 5.1115512 MUM 15. — Mt= 82157 BilINDICOs 1ACR Mel — 2' *001 47151 tertOrri 120.5555 5.Ic./D'00*.5 '1;51.30111.1.7511TIOntrli=r 00 0/770 05501100.71 5-512 COMM. CAB • ar5115 - I 1 (10771707) E I; - ----- ; 7 if -- „I ( 1 1 1-1 \ I I 1 / \ I I I I I I if-GEMP DENCI101 EOM 0, PELAND 75 DEUHCATED Br ltdeadd, EitellOtatreTri. raelao 7000 Liee E515145 Oro .on 00205 0.. or Mt. 17•01 Coo.. Mt.. 1808710 Ltnesso soon. — 6C — (low000l hooral000n L. o ar— Om.. Marrero 7100 35 CM.. 71,1poor Boa 1.511515. Po. IX. 0407,0r surm tx. 10475100. ,------ ZOOM '?5.8'Ic;simsfir"..94-7,/"K?Ic71 DENOTES EXIST/NO BUILDING DENOTES WATER DARDEN VienLm r PV4Etta ..5r • / AYRA8945/ 4,,, f 010Ry897.0 r DENOTES PROPOSED WATERMAN DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER AND CATCH BASIN DENOTES PROPOSED FORCEMAIN Ism■mi■ DENOTES S woOD CHIP TRAIL DENOTES EASENENT GRAPHIC SCALE ( 01 PUT 1 laaD .100 h. TA vair IIINCH21113111RINCI 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (763) 862-3281 I hereby Cerliry Ihol this plan. speelllastion or report woe prepOrint by me Or antler my direct supervisian and that I am a dilly Licensed PraleSsienal Engineer once, the lows 07 000 Stole of Minnesota Print Nome: LowrolCe J. Olsen Sionalure- DNA 2L5104 RtglAlratian No %EP__ RE117.01 • • JUL 0 7 2005 CITY OP' LINO • • OWNER AND SUBDIVIDER: ENGINEER: A.15 COMPANIES. INC. 1875 STA7100 PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55384 (753) 755 -6554 LSJ ENGINEERING, INC. 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55304 (753) 862 -3281 WAIN A / PONDBS •tlWL -904.5 1 YR =904.7 10YR =900,2 1O0R -905.8 PINE GLEN DRAINAGE AREA MAP for 23, LLC. James` i f I Street 'ry ( PONOp3 i POND NWL =896.5 r IYRv896.6 ._.. .AV �>, r-.>•s- �fYtYYYtWYEI 41hY.Y =R. f.. - - .» � � �.� 7 �• l r79147- ��' ���a? "✓���c+� =ski ' � €'! �• Ali /-'11 ��1t��.i1�__..��'��.�.�. ��a►���.�.�a r' DRY ON 1 11YP. =897.5 .1 OYR =897.7 17 _es.x�mY�L • 1 =ROOM /MOW rt '1 POND /• • NWL=604.0 IYR.904,0 I • OYR =904.1 L OOYR =904,# f INFILTRATIO ,AREA #7 ,t 11M107.0 .¢'.= LA» »�`w..I .N --- -- r`s 1�` eI10TR=9 w 0; I ', *'•514,' h' - --1 -1- - - j -1 --I_.. ` . . I I `I '�1 , Il I ,Ii I T I I ' I I; - - -- ,.I ,r �, I 11 .'''...z...: ( ( I • I _ ,---I., I�,•- I-'-- - -' I I I (I . N...._....--" 1 `• •�.,I I 1 r I - I I- • � �, Lois Lan e r -L I I I STANDARD STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE. 1. L 1-,/2' w41oo,R432I 0[.800 ROARS MOp02 52357 91180800E 1422 COA1 r onW1 02351 AMBER COLIRA _ 05/001. G.. 5 2.' 1,7001 221521 ORNANAR RAW (Aal4DON.A SECTOR 04500LM DR READ 00010111049) 0-412 DORCNEIL 000,7 k 04TSR trcrhin DEN0155 OFF 0I RLLAN0 A9 061NEA1E0 9Y 5458040 ENMRCN1EMAL r •' r ` ylr.hlma Ire. 0I. EWlep 500 15 ❑ (mows /h.. Ne. --tam -- 2 N.., Colman m5.... 5065 Mow. Irmo, -. _ Gress.u0 irmr.w.xce tee 0...000,7 UfIMy EI. . -• Spot Dere tan "u0 7..0600, 60. n]. WWIy Pak ® 11YN -e-- FK SAW7ARr 0(KR EX. WAIERMAW u- FX. =RN SFR£R °® DENOTES 501L BORING BT 575 CONSULTANTS, INC. DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING I i9Rd9065) I _____i- `_.____�__yej OOYR 9906.8 I - 4 -a --- `�-- - -•- 1 1 i :::::1=L-.-_-_-_:,-,,,, I� ;1I I '-1---- 1 I 'TAE_ f,,. 1 I j 1 ;.,I ti.1 - -1 `I. 1 I 1 �.J �__ I .a ti _ _: 111 T 1 ._ -L -- (1 DENOTES WATER GARDEN PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR -� -� PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR FASTING DRAINAGE AREAS Et CI FF 235 ACRES 12.1 ACRES (OFP sin) 21.9 ACRES 3.5 ACRES (OFF SITE) 61.3 ACRES PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS '10.7 ACRES 5.6 ACRES (OFF SFFE) 1.6 ACRES 2.6 ACRES (OFT SITE) 11.2 ACRES 3.4 ACRES 0.7 ACRES (OFT SITE) 2.5 ACRES 0.6 ACRES (OFF SITE) 10.7 ACRES (OFF SITE) 0.6 ACRES (OFF SITE) 2.6 ACRES (OTT SITE) 1.6 ACRES (OFF SITE) 2.5 ACRES (OFF SITE) 0.7 ACRES (OFF SITE) 61.3 ACRES DENOTES S' WOOD pile TRAIL DEN07E5 EASEMENT P080 #5. • N4VL.,d9A.5 y1v(e:594'.8 l 1 DTR+rB9B 1 16071104p) GRAPHIC SCALE ( OE. FE97 Web - 700 ft. E2 IN VW Mi I Li DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY DENOTES EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA DENOTES EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY L J 1675 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN, 55309 (753) 562 -3281 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my street superwsian and that I am o duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the lows of the Slate of Minnesota Print Nome: 50.8,005 .L Otson Si*notura G � -�- Dote f /2f/ 1 Registration No. 50753 50180: 0/9/00 GRAPHIC SCALE 1� 1 MO . 100 IL e D PINE GLEN OWNER AN0 SUMMER: WETLAND FILL AND TREE PRESERVATION PLAN for 23, LLC. James I .N° 42,41 ( 1 .x14YX4x4 .1 41',� ) Street INFILTRATION AREA }q 1 10101 DRY POND ����j,4� 11TRo897.5 1 4 C'1 1p7R -8f 7 g - �.'n' YiA{'Ogy: ENGINEER: 23. LLC 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (763) 725 -6554 3.22 ENGINEERING, INC. 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN, 55304 (763) 062 -3281 n 1 1 u - - - -T1� 111= 898 .61 PW183 65 5 \4 r / l - • rYVrrrM 100 -897, POND/5 ------- _•1700904.5 10709005. 10011 =9905. 100112=905.B m H 34 i3(sy ,4� Arga,Ve (Unopened)/ -- " -ON •R RIWL =904.0 I 11711=904.0 I r 1,A,NNANIAtAi l /llronr�rtc:, 00'PI4u_ 10730904.1 , ¢ 10040 =904.3 .4# }+ I t l INFlLTRATIO AREA #7 `` ,I1078 =907.5 100711.00714 1 ) i .____ -- tl ; n 1 I 1 1( f'„1 1 n STANDARD STREET SECTION 801 TO SCALE 1 -111' 5e001 !2311 044840 00544 0n00I 12397 911A1410*5 IACA 0021 Y YM01 42531 0X000 =NM S 5i/Ddl 55. S 74' Wa01 301ER 5MOUR 925E (3 4 011 01 5 1 S 01705 34053/041 On roll 0040111355) 0-412 CONCRETE CURB a OATEN Minn' NAP ROT 70 SCALE t - - -- - --•1----= - - -I 1 . I I 4-1 --- - - -1 - _ + I T I _ r \, i 'I Lois Lan e LFCvND OLNOTLS LOO( or *ELAND -►•-. •- S DELWEA755 117 N101W6 3NwRONNLNIAL rv\'\'T•1 ENrho 7ne 1Ne ENlee NN seep (Nettie ep. N New -. —.— Fenn -- 1001 -- 2 En/ Callow hlrraal - -100 -- 10 root 0351931 infer. —4!— Owinepa RnOaurgn Lint —aw— 0. 4nood Willy are Sprl Ebalbn 1eNpnaee Han WOO Pate 1055 1 —Q (4 SANITARY 3[440 3k 0A1ERNAN N— L%. MORN 4EW:R DENOTES SOIL BORING BY STS CONSULTANTS. INC. DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING DENOTES DETENSION POND iv kit/ NOTES TREES TO BE SAVED DENOTES 8' WOOD CHIP TRAIL DENOTES WETLAND FILL AREA l 93 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, NN. 55304 (783) B62 -3281 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification a report was prepared by me or Anon. my direct oupervision and that 1 oat 0 duly Licensed Professional Engineer unoer the laws or the Stole of Nlnnesat0. Print Noma Lawranoe -,6 -.01000 Signature.Qr Date 1Y1� Registrolbn No. 1(3753 _ 5E•ASSLs 0/0(00 If imam Eli) I I (4749%715) I i 10707508.5 (' - I- '- ---I -- - .gl0D03 906.8 �% - - 1'--- I r I I I 1 ,art- / 1 I 1 I 1 / 1 3.15894.5;' JUL 0 7 2005 • Sec A 7 31n;224 ...;kasy7 ass AP GRAPHIC SCALE ( 0 US, 1 ft, Krim - -T-4465 rees 4t3 cr, N89•32'09"W 314.85 SE • -• James -------- ; /r I -"I I 15,377 OF. 2570 1.5 5 - 70.77 PINE GLEN R 1X SKETCH PLAN for 23, LLC. Street 1 1 / 7-1 ▪ 1 ET L ; 3 • , 1 4 OWNER AND SUBDIVIDER: ENG/NFER. SURVEYOR: LLC 7875 STATION PARKWAY NW. 10400850, AIN. 55304 (763) 755-6554 LS.I ENGINEERING, RC, 1875 STATION PARKWAY' NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (763) 1362-32111 14idwrret Land Survoyore & Civil Engineors inc. 710 East River Rood AliolcO, MN. 55303 (763) 712-9099 1 i'l 1 '1 . ; / 1 i 1 { j 1 L_) it / 1 i ' ■ .: • ) , 1 - 1 (I .0' 4 4 ' I / ‘i i 4 1 k . -2.41:00444.3..1,,mtm ' (M4retr '',,....,,,711,--• a, •••-• Anoko Co CAte 0 norm 7/4 Cotner See.9.7311144021V PROPOSED LOTS: Proposed Zoning s 51.4 Single Family Late = 72 001009, 42011 oo 17,530 5.F. DOMily, Lots Per Acre = 0.95 Commercial Lots 2- _ Total 0400 0 4.05 Acres She Area = 66.46 Acres Upland Area = 44.78 ACM Vhdiand Al. 0 23.68 Acres Oullots = 25.53 Acres (COMMON AREA) = 26.13 Acres " s'■ 1:1 9 17.950 ST. -ttr410,- 21301 S.i. o E-4 a GICNl4e�li2-a5-RI -Ytl•a ei 41 /U415 213:10 AN UP , PROPOSED I COMMERCIAL AREA I / 1 1.1,1 fr..,,xs MOM 2 0. Arno. An. 320796. .174 g---1 777651777. -OM? IF. ups SJA...415 ems SS) Mmtneti. 1 (Unopenend). / --.N89"33 30"W ALS MAO --- " ts. 2638.29 , Duiiiiit-------Aventle- .., (1.1irbpnned ).'" 'I. ‘,.10..........,,-;;;;;7, -,,,,,t,,,-,!-IYY.P,urn-1,7/7me,e04-7,,,^1,-,,,L.,,,,,,,Ineelt,•:,,,,eun . 000 - 1" /1 ,/.....---1------- \ 4 \ \ 1-- ------ ---1 1 (1 . 1 t _ • #.;•,4,,t,EL„,.,1.1t,,, ,,,,, A i ? 1 1 1 1 '---1 ', . i / _...0- 1 ,," „Ti--- ,,--1----., -1.:\ \,.1 1 1 1-" ----- FT.:- ----- [-::::---., 1,„ ,eil„,- ------i--- ------ -1----..._ 1 1 1 - fifi .. r , ; ...„ .., , .... „ -- /1 ( i 1 ,,, If 4',, -,,,1 \ ,, k, 1- ----- ---1---- ----- -±----- fa .., ------ -1---,. __, ii _----1.., ----- J_ t-------... 1 s„ 1 /„4/ 1 ',, i \,, 1 \ is\ ,, \ 1 :,, J.) J_-1-------1 1 1 :;,, 1 ', ' i ,, ,-,J.l /AI 1 1, 1 '----', \ 1 -3, ii=4-14:a-/,,-----1,- 1 1 ,_.1.--__Vf:,vvi 1 ..------ ,,, u \-- ----- _t„_);','-:9,:l'' ; , ---,i, .///1 ,..., i T1 N 5'28"W 1 1 1 1 1 l Lois I I Lane IC] - I/1-J - --- DFSCRIPTION ma coo.. O Commoner.. La. TAM mato. Co. Mk Commitment Fee Mo. 70712061 P.M A 1.1 port of tors 5 000 0. Auoilot's . 700 Mona Count, *ann/o. Mino Southerly of the for.. ors.. ene Commeno. ot toe m.1 Mannerly wane, of sod Cal 4 me. Soulleemy . the Scot Me .et of 5 3082 Het to Ine 0073 07 Oesunnint Monet .M.Y. 1011 ou.S. 4534 feel, nwee or 7.50 to nontmetirtly Mot of sod Lug 5 Atelno Ri9Iff of Atm Ant of Armlemay 8). Mere ..notine, and oleo lyruo northerly of a Mt oro. from the .11h.e1 my. sod Lot O. ot on angle of neurens. 75 mew. 30 seconds. nononuran teem Alm. to .1. to the wen., One oi acid Lot 6. ono them reumnotuo Emeptino Men.= coo oll onv.e. all pert lying orilPer 02 *000 Counly nigheoy AMM Or 11(0o Plot 17. Aneko C000(N Aseaesolo. peeem Treot pan of the South 77050, 20 00010.011 000013. of Mt tico,I.00l :Astor of Scotton 77 la.a. 39. 5005n Coo(O7, 1010 Cowen, anO 5outherly of 1. WO, 133 feel of Om West 37850 feet .1 (omen, of the Loot. /kr of Anoka Coonty hrsheroy MVO- 01- rem Feee no. 17, occoraing to MS. Governmolt Sun,. Ando Covaf,, 7. South 2077 07 Me Menneost Ouonet or Me farennvir Owner of 5.0782 0 70.4072 37, P.. 22 Mann County, leionesoie. Re South Half of the Man.. Cuorfor of Me Mtn.. theertor of 5.7. 0 Tonnebip St Range 22. Moto Cot. /*ewe Tee 0.0 080 07 Ihe 72010eos7 Clooner 07 70 Northeast Um., or Scotian A 70.002,5 37. Ron. 22. An. Cotato 08070018 7702087 the lash:fly 73aoo feet Ow. INN MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM AREA: 12,825 Sq.N. 8INIM54 FRONTAGE: 90 Feet 0 front building solhaok line 110 Feet, Gaynor Lot MINIMUM DEPTH 135 Feet BUILDING 5E7134585 30 Foot Front 35 Fool Rear 10 Fool 58. Streoi 5 Foot Attached arage SITE LoS LA AILEW VICINITY NAP NOT 10 00012 1 1E55W DENO= EDGE OF *ELMO 00 0087000505 81' AJONAUG GeNictodnlAs (.7s125 Moe an. E.,. It. 10000 172073 of Pew -4-4- Fence --Moe-- 2 Awl Cm., Moro. --IOW- 00 foot Cp.. kW. Owaleo, konsinkrsion Line Ovren.00. Line Spol • JAlepleane ▪ Wity Pole SAMITARY SETER 11101170.4 Lt. SIMI SESER o DENOTES SOIL BCRING BY STS CONSULTANTS. INC. DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING DENOTES DETENSION POND DE0t411540 vEICLE mAINTENANCE- OENETIES 8' WOOD CHIP TRAIL 30' MONT SMACK U lac) OENOTES .1010 AT FRONT 7(10207 DENOTES LOT NUMBER OENOTES LOT AREA DENOTES LOT UPLAND AREA DENOTES PAO AKA 50' 50' RCAMDUAL MOUSE SIZES HAY OAR, JO 1:0'151i,r41511"' ON THE PLAN. TYPICAL LOT DETAIL NOT 70 SCAU I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and OGG I orn a duly registered Land Surveyor under the lows of the State .., of Minnesota. 1901.33 2 1 NOTE: 7.) ALL DIMTING ON SITE BUILDINGS SNALL 86 REMOVED PER CITY REGUIREmENIS. OOTLOTS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY 8400078559000 ASSOC. AND BE COVERED BE DRAINAGE te UTILITY EASEMENT. ------ 8 "i",' -------------- --' ,-, afi'• ,-) = \-1,...).. --- " , is SC) \ ,.4... ,,,..., f(' 4,, ....... r, •,... ounar C ,,, , : E 11, ,..;„, , lt., 1' Sae L Moore Reg. No. 7.27 Date nnt4 „nrYinuervuseyyrrenen-rnurur, ;Arr, IA? s V,..4 1'1 '1 I. • • MIDWEST Land Surveyors it Civil Rngoneero Inc „ I, r.m 1,0Z.TII-OOSO 7100., °((3.0oo mme no id-Ps • 780527,87 71100 17' ,E P\I CZ) Ci) moo -.7. I.; • • RECE1VtY:' SEP 0 1 2005• CITY OF LINO LAKES • • AGENDA ITEM V.C. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: September 14, 2005 TOPIC: PUD Amendment — Permissible Uses Hartford Development, Inc. BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has submitted plans for a hotel within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project. The previously adopted Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide did not include a hotel as one of the permissible uses within Chapter 3.1. A hotel would be a positive addition to the project as it would offer a diversity of uses and additional users for the businesses located within the project. A hotel is an appropriate mix with retail and office, and is considered a permissible use within the GB (General Business) zoning district by the zoning ordinance. GB (General Business) is the standard commercial zoning classification for the city and allows commercial uses similar to what would be allowed within the commercial and mixed use districts of the Legacy project. Staff feels that this omission was not meant to prohibit the use within the Commercial and Mixed Use districts, but rather was just an oversight at the time. In fact the guidelines contain a parking standard for a hotel which would indicate it was a use that was anticipated within the development. Staff has had discussions regarding hotels in the Legacy project as far back as when Calthorpe was still involved in the project. Staff has even had discussions with the City Council at work sessions were the use was proposed and met no specific objections at the time. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the amendment of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide to add Hotel as a permissible use within the Commercial and Mixed Use Districts. 2. Return to staff with direction RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the amendment to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide to add Hotel as a permissible use within the Commercial and Mixed Use Districts. • • AGENDA ITEM V.D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: September 14, 2005 TOPIC: PUD Amendment — Signage Criteria Hartford Development, Inc. BACKGROUND City staff is working with the developer to come up with acceptable signage criteria for the Legacy at Wood's Edge project. We had intended on presenting a draft at this meeting, however it has proven to be more difficult and time consuming than originally anticipated. At this time a draft is not ready for review by the Planning and Zoning Board. Staff is recommending that the Public Hearing be continued to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. OPTIONS. • 1. Continue the public hearing to the October 12, 2005 regular meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends continuing the public hearing. AGENDA ITEM V.E.1 • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: September 14, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plan — Hotel Legacy at Woods Edge BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a hotel within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the hotel as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). Though a Hotel is not currently listed as a permissible use in Chapter 3 of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide, included on this agenda is a staff initiated amendment to the Planned Unit Development to allow a Hotel as a permissible use in the commercial and mixed use districts. IIINALYSIS Planned Unit Development Wood's Edge Hotel is located in a Commercial Land Use area and is located on Lot 12 in Block B (this lot is slightly larger than that depicted on the Land Use Plan). Acceptable Building Types are Commercial with a maximum number of three floors. It will consist of 83 rooms, spanning 3 stories with a maximum height of 44 feet. The proposed site plan is generally consistent with the regulating plan layout with modification to the parking lot design. The current configuration shows an improved parking lot layout being primarily located on the back and sides of the building; however, the main entrance to the hotel is not accessible or visible from the street. The lot is required to meet the build -to line of 5 feet, and currently does not. A revised site plan depicting conformance with that standard must be submitted. The secondary entrance that is provided along the street frontage will function as a secondary access point for guests that already hold room keys who have visited the rest of the development. However due to the location of the door it is important that it is designed to have a strong architectural distinction and clearly be a focal point and visual terminus for the road. The city's streetscape is not included on the site plan therefore it does not show connection to the pedestrian walkways or demonstrate integration with the onsite landscaping features. Building Materials/ Elevations Legacy Hotel, page 2 The exterior treatment of the building is shown as having a combination of a field stone pattern with steel lap *ding. While the stone or stone -like material is acceptable, steel lap siding would not even be allowed by the zoning ordinance in any regular business district. Nor is it reflective of the character of the urban fabric desired for the Lino Lakes Town Center. Materials that are visibly simulated or prefabricated are prohibited. Wood, masonry, and stone are considered appropriate building materials. The structural character of the facade does not clearly demonstrate the three recognizable material elements of a base, middle, and top. Because this particular building has so many windows, attention and detail to the quality of the windows is important. The design standards require a reveal of at least 2 inches from the exterior trim to create shadow for visual interest rather than windows and trim flush with the building. Sometimes this shadow can be created with solid window trim. Landscaping The landscape plan reflects a more naturalized and informal planting scheme which is to be encouraged, but along the streetscape it needs be more in keeping with the city's landscaping as well as the general urban theme. Additional overstory trees are needed on the site. Crimson King and Colorado blue spruce should be eliminated in favor of Red Oak, Hackberry, or Red Pine. Likewise, Red Maple and Eastern Red Cedar should be eliminated. Bush Honeysuckle should replace the Green Velvet shrubs. Berberis thinbergi should be replaced since it is not considered hardy and is a trash collector. Neon Flash is considered an acceptable substitute. In iiieneral the landscape plan needs further revision and review by staff prior to it being considered adequate for is site. As always, irrigation will be required for all sodded areas and for all plant materials on site. Lighting The photometric lighting plan meets the guidelines of the Town Center Design and Development guide, but it does not account for the wall mounted luminaries. The mounting height of the lighting is also not indicated. All pole mounted lights within the parking lot are limited to a maximum height of 20 feet, and all other pole mounted lights used for walkway or other lighting are limited to a maximum height of 14 feet. It is also recommended that the Domus luminaire located near the south entrance drive be moved further west to better illuminate the drive. A revised lighting plan indicating conformance with these recommendations must be submitted. Parking The parking requirements for this building alone are 83 parking spaces. The parking provided (87 stalls) exceeds the requirement. This site is a part of what was identified as Block 2b of the Land Use Plan for Legacy at Wood's Edge. As was mentioned earlier, the layout of this block has changed slightly. Since this lot will involve a single -user and all of the necessary parking for the building can be accommodated on site, the parking for this use is clearly • Legacy Hotel, page 3 sufficient. When the rest of Block 2b is developed the uses proposed will need to provide the appropriate •arking on site as well. ENGINEERING S.E.H. is serving as the city's engineer on the Legacy at Wood's Edge project and their comments in regards to the project's engineering are attached in memo form. These comments must be addressed with revised plans. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31St regular meeting. Their comments are attached and will need to be addressed with revisions to the plan set. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the application be continued to the October 12, 2005 meeting. ATTACHMENTS 1. SEH memorandum dated September 2, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Country Inn and Suites (Legacy Hotel) plan set received August 15, 2005. • • • • • September 6, 2005 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: R SEP 0 6 2005 CITY, OF LiVIO LAK RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Woods Edge Hotel Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.08 SPCV Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Woods Edge Hotel site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on August 15, 2005. Site Layout and Paving Plan (Sheet C2.0) 1. A handicap accessible curb ramp must be called out at the handicap accessible parking stalls. 2. According to ADA rules, there should be 4 handicap accessible parking stalls and access aisles for the 81 space parking lot as shown. 3. The easterly entrance has a note calling out "Bit curb and gutter... ". This should be corrected to be concrete curb and gutter. 4. The applicant shall furnish supporting documentation to verify truck turning movements can be accommodated in the parking lot. Erosion Control and Grading Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. CBMH 107 appears to be deeper than needed. The storm sewer in this submittal, in combination with the storm sewer on the Lakewoods Apartments site, could be significantly raised in elevation. 2. The pond which the storm sewer outlets to has a NWL of 890.0. Storm sewer elevations must be revised to reflect this. 3. Riprap is required at the storm sewer outlet to the pond. A detail must be shown. 4. Catch basin manhole and storm manhole details must be shown for proposed structures. A detail is shown for a 2'x3' catch basin, but this type of structure is not being used. 5. Infi- Shield neoprene sealing sleeves (or equal) must be used on all manholes. 6. Current contours and spot elevations indicate storm water will be trapped in the northwest corner of the trash and recycle enclosure. 7. CBMH 102 has a rim elevation of 903.97. This elevation does not fit with the grading plan. 8. The main entrance shows a grade of approximately 6% from the doorway to the parking lot curb. This exceeds the City maximum allowable grade of 5% and does not meet ADA requirements of a maximum 2% cross slope perpendicular to direction of travel. 9. Gutters should be tipped out and labeled as such where appropriate. 10. There are a number of locations where text is on top of text and is very difficult to read. All text must be readable. • • • Mr. Michael Grochala September 2, 2005 Page 2 11. The applicant shall coordinate with SEH to verify that proposed connections to public utilities are shown in the proper location with the proper elevation. 12. Spot elevations at building corners must be provided to verify positive drainage away from building. 13. It appears that the sidewalk directly outside of the east entrance has a cross slope in excess of 12 %. This exceeds the maximum allowable slope. 14. The sidewalk north of the northeast corner of the building has a steep cross slope of approximately 12% at the narrow point before the island between the spot elevations of 2.46 and 3.16. It is unknown if this is meant for pedestrian traffic. 15. Storm water runoff from the parking lots must be captured and conveyed to the pond by internal storm sewer rather than allowed to drain out onto Town Center Parkway. 16. Silt fence is not indicated on the plans. Silt fence must encompass all construction areas, including the overland storm sewer pipe. 17. Wood fiber blanket is required to be used on any disturbed steep slopes such as the storm sewer outlet pipe run to the pond. Please call me at 651.490.2147 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Robert L. Moberg, PE Project Manager nm xdko \Iinol\030508 \plan review \woodsedgehotel090205 - enginccring.doc • • Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board August 31, 2005 Legacy at Woods Edge Legacy Hotel: Plant Schedule: Recommend the following changes based on the Plant Schedule - -- Crimson King maple is a Norway maple and of borderline hardiness. Norway maples are also listed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as invasive to our native woodlands. Suggest changing this species to one of the following -- Northern Pin Oak, Red Oak, Bur Oak, Autumn Blaze Maple, Hackberry, American Linden, and Green Ash. Change Greenspire Linden to Redmond Linden (a cultivar of the American Linden). Change Colorado Blue Spruce to White or Norway Spruce. If salt spray is a concern along the freeway (usually within 60 feet), Black Hills Spruce and Ginkgo may be more tolerant, than eastern Red Cedar and Linden. Sod areas must be shown as irrigated. All top soils should be described as incorporated into the sub soil for several inches. Erosion Control The developer should submit an erosion control plan that details NPDES requirements and is acceptable to the City. The plan and inspections reports for this plan must be located on site with an indicated location on the plan. Work with staff on lighting and ensuring that lighting meets the minimum standard. Motion to approve recommendations by Bauman, second by Bor. All were in favor. Motion passed. VICINITY MAP ABBREVIATIONS /,. 0c0u00C F.O. ACT. ACOUSTIC TILE FEE. 001 ADJACENT DR AOJUSTARL0 F A.F.F. AAONE FINISHED FLOOR TIM. ALUM. A1.0410I11 FUPot N.T. ALTERNATE AT DA. A.P. ACCESS PANEL C4Y. ARCH. ARG3IECT GW. 9 AT GYP. B0. BOARD H.C. BLOC. BUILDING 0000. BUG BOCK HD100. BUM. BLOCKING H.M. ROT. BOTTOM RORIE. CA CASING HR CAB. CABINET IBC GEM. MDR IN' =UL CFA. CONWC TNT. C.L. CAS IRON JAN. CID. CDUNC .01. CL CLOSET JT. COL COLU.IN Mm. CONC. CONCRETE LAK COAST. CONSIRILTON UN. CONT. CONTINUOUS MAN. CONTR CONTRACTOR MANUF. CORR. CORRIDOR MAX CPT. CARPET CR. CARD READER C.T. CERAMIC TILE C.W. O SEM990 DE . DETAIL D NA. DIMENSION DR DOOR 00. DISH WASHER ONGS, DRAWINGS EA EACH NOM. 0.. ELEVATOR D.C. F1E0. ELEVATOR 0.0. ELEC. ELECTRICAL 0.17. ENGR. E900404 P.C. FM. ENTRANCE PI- EP. ECUAL P1AM EMIR. EQUIPMENT PR 0011 EXISTING PT EXP. EIPOSEO OR EXPANSION O.T. FXf. EXTERIOR E% W /ETC 904)00 14/1A1C F1000 DRAIN FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIXTURE FURNACE GAUGE GALVANIZED GROSS W00141 GYPSUM HOLLOW CORE HANDICAP HARDWOOD HOLLOW METAL HORIZONTAL HOUR INi01NAT0ONAL BUILBNG COOS INSULATION INTERIOR JANITOR JOIST JOINT LOCK DOWN LAVATORY WHEN CLOSET MAINTANENCE MANUFACTURER MAXIMUM MECH. MECHANICAL MEO. CAB. MEDICINE CARNET MFR MANUFACTURER MIN. MINIMUM M . MASONRY OPENING MIL N.LC 091 040. MATERIALS -1- SYMBOLS R REF, REEL METAL NOT IN CONTRACT NOT 10 SCALE NUMBER NOMINAL ' ON CDOER OUTSIDE DIAMETER OPPOSITE HAND PRECAST PLATE PLASTIC LAMINATE PAIR PANT OR POINT QUARRY TILE R0DU15 REFERENCE OR REFRIGERATOR REFLECTED RE TUG. REINF. REVD REV. R.O. 014 S.C. SECT. S.F. 5HT. BIM. 5 W(0 SPEC. 4 ST. SRA 0100D4T. SV. T0G T.O. T.P. D5 TUB UDC 040. 0NO V.C.T. V.B. VFRT. HST. V.W.C. WRNS WO W.R. W/ W/0 W/0 1D. REFRIGERATOR RONF0RCE0 561100N REWIRED RANCE/OVEN ROD AND SHELVE SOLI0 CORE OR SECURITY CAMERA SECTOR SQUARE FEET SHEET SIMILAR SINK WITH DISPOSAL SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD STEEL STORAGE STRUCTURAL 5LEVE 10411 TONGUE AND GROOVE TOP DF TOILER PAPER 05PEN500 BATHTUB TELEVISION TYPICAL UNIFORM BUILDING CODE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VINT. FLOOR COVERING VAPOR BASER VERTICAL VESTIBULE VINYL WALL COVERING WAINSCOT WATER CLOSET WOOD WATER RESISTANT METH WASHER/ DRYER WITHOUT TARO CONCRETE MOM BLOCK MON- STUD PARDON ▪ FINISHED WOOD -I- 100.0 ROUGH WOOD 011 BIDDING BLOCKING DR SHIM WOOD STUD 148II001 517E 80RNG DOSING GRADE DEVOTION + 1 100.0'1 NEW DUDE ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES _,Ir~ —rr11 ImmzrAzil I1.1 111' SAND EARTH GRAVEL PL1W000 STEEL BAIT OR LOOSE F91 NSULA1100 RIGID INSULATION A0DUmc TILE EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR NEW GRADE CONCUR DETAIL NO. SHEET N0. SECTION OR ELEVATOR DIRECTION INDICATION <>.— WALL TYPE 010814000 TYPE (2— DOOR NUMBER OFRCE..—ROOM DESCRIPTION 10 ROM NUMBER ®0IZONT SOSNNI1pO IIMOZI WR suc.ragrecereweassrmwas LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA HOTEL 83 ROOMS 87 PARKING STALLS BLDG: 14,900 S.F. / FL SITE: 85,400 S.F. (1.50 ACRES) - /C,OMMERCIAL ,E .D : 7,000 S.F. SITE: 9,025 S.F14 (0.21 ACR 4-1/ PROJECT TEAM OWNER LEGACY 00104405 -LL, L10 12100 SINCLETREE LANE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 FRANK VANES (952) 746 -1211 FJNKESOHARIFOROCRP.COM 0210 MARL 891 REB COLE GROUP ARCHITECTS 216 PARK AVENUE SOUTH, SURE 102 SANE CLOUD, MN 56301 PHONE (320) 654 -6570 Fax: (320) 230 -6570 ISTRLC11.11AL BNCOCERNCI HARTFORD CROUP, INC. ARCHITECTS /ENGINEERS 12100 SINCLETREE LANE EDEN PR9RIE, MN 55344 GARY C. REINHOLD P.E. 352) 746 -1237 RONHCL061444TORD0RP.CCM . EE`SuS` 10 iLt�'�'m9'�AFaarkii�TlPrtA!_ �iV1' -O3 HARTFORD GROUP, INC. ARCHITECTS /ENGINEERS 12100 SIN610000E LANE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PATRICK SARVER A5LA (912) 746 -1210 PS0VEROHA.T, FOROCRP.COM U HARTFORD CROUP, INC. ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS 12100 SINGLE10EE LANE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 AARON ARCHBOLD PE (352) 746 -1217 AM0CHBOLDOFNRTFOROGRP.COM 1 TEC}$4 ^..AL 090410FB RON SHAFFER BRAUN 401ERTEC 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE. S. M NNEAPOUS, MN 55439 (002) 995 -2200 RSHAFFEROBRAUNCORP.COM KEVIN HOFFMAN BRAUN INTERTEC 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE. S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55456 (952) 095 -2200 KH OFF'MANOB RAUNIN I FJ<1 EC.COM L SHEET INDEX =01 T -1 1701E SHEET X11. C1.0 SURVEY C1.1 SURVEY 01.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C2.0 SITE LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN C3.0 GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN C4.D LANDSCAPE PLAN 04.1 UCHRN0 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ARCHRECTLE61 FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS aATR UCTIRAI T0CHANICAI FI FCTRICAL AMC ti ,AUG 1 5 2005 c! F L FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 1210 S eiVeStalse.SAN ,(0 Iw:PPR.N.Pm CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 100405400.00041146 EDEN NAME, H'1 95T]NE09W 952.71E1ffi PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 08/15/05 CITY SUBMITTAL C REV. THLS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER: T1 • \ VE \TORY SURVEY w . w 1— cVRIHS Z 30 Z IS HS 335 '3N111-0.0/11-} „Y/5 0 0 0 g 0 a O rT C —J CO tcn 0) fr ,1 s bFt! 41 11 1;i; f=;Al €ill; llit €I cae iilfleeaggaoegi!s -s %W n AA. alSAAAAMAAIMIA AAIAA1 11 vj .0,44-1187 ca 0aeea6. %Ffi a • ittit _6E.5 i 43 ,•1./em, wsv m at a GU C 1 5 Z005 0 4 4 S > d V 4 ). 1 N (1 0 0 4 V A O N V M.Rtfifl.fY1. 4 4 4 4 p zz a h II tfAS:Y"'sT §silfflaFaoah W Ili! e aaFaettekeFetkeaaetaattaeaet of nn 1 1 O U_ 0 0 f O a_ Z5 °�' 0 n- z O J l[) \ W El— J Oz Qa �N 0 cr C O z < O W = T L9 0 c5 0 CD 1 5133HS Z 40 l . 33HS 33S '3NI1Ha YI 0 0 i 0 a 0 0 AUG y 20;5 \\ r ( L, ,'- \ ` \ \ \i ' I \ m rr ! \ r'' r-'-----',1 r/l rill 3, ,-.•;-:--;- r r r r \ 1, °Y \ . sir r ,r ,r T 11 iir rrr • / /i_� „. lfli l gym%' ■ _ ' ;51'40T, J1A%G oA •• ^%c 1 1 rl I '♦ ' �' ' 1"/ , %fi / r/ / --1;::•::::"" !1// ! r� r/ �' ,/ I , ,', / /, /'f r /r irr.� rr i}.. r I / .- / 1 r :iii.' / 1 r � /rr r jam,. ,0 I � ♦-/ :� \\ ' \\ \ 2.1\ \ \ r \ I \ � \ \\ i \ M./ / ,5 .� 1 .1 \\ \ \ y I \ /7/' i - J� )I I 1 u 1 I' / I 1 1 I I f! r' %' 1 I T T 1 ) i rfJ I i I 1 I / i i 1 "-,,t,, I I i /i % i I t\ � 1 I \.,/ N 1 y 1 1 I \ T \ `\ \ \ i \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 \ 1 \ l 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 (I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 It I 1 I I I % ♦ /I 1 ti r -,,./ 1 I • 1 t 1 11 ` ; 1 1 1 1 % // 1 % / 1 % !1� I � i. r1'( ' f TT' / ! /11 / r / I I Fg g - 1�' 20 1� 20 Gb 4— EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES:-- - 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY BASED UPON PROPOSED CITY IMPROVEMENTS AND SITE 006011ION5 AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND C1ARLY DISPLAY ALL PERMITS AND APPROVALS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' (851 - 454 -0002 OR 800- 252 -1180) AND UTILITY COMPANIES TO NOTIFY LOCATION OF NEW UTILITIES 48 HOURS MINIMUM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY PROPERTY. OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SURVEY INFORMATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENCINEE0/LANO5CAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT 'MIL IMPACT PROJECT WORK. 5. EXISTING HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE FLAGGED AND PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE 000011:UC1ICi CONTRACT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER DAMAGED OR MISSING MONUMENTS OR CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SECURITY THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. DAMAGED OR VANDALIZED STOCKPILE SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO C05T TO THE DEVELOPER. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO IDENTIFY AND PROTECT ON -SITE STRUCTURES AND VEGETATION IDENTIFIED ON NNE DRAWINGS TO BE REMAINED THROUGHOUT 1110 DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 9. IF NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DIRECTION OF 100 ENCINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION DEUNIAIE GENERAL POSITION OF TEMPORARY FENCING. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE FENCE ON OR NEAR THE SURVEYED PROPERTY LINE SO AS TO N07 INTERFER WITH CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS. AUG 1 5 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION mMORBem. 1..AC.Y mu. .ION . ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 12111391,10111..t. MAY WS INC 0171....1111 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 1711 6 100 10. 1.41.4 H FllB WNE, 990 -1/5119 94-74-12131 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 18/15/95 CITY SUBMITTAL REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: DUSTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C1.2 —G06 TRASH k RECYCLE tPVOS�/ / LIMIT OF 4612 CURB AND GUTTER IRRIGATED AREA OMIT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SOD UNIT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIMIT OF 0612 CURB AND CUTTER iP. �� III h 11 111 SUBGRADE 1" WEARING COURSE TACK COAT 2" BASE COURSE 5' CLASS 5 AGGREGATE 000002E LIMIT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIMIT OF 0612 CURB AND G11TTR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, TYP // 50D • HOTEL 8 ROOMS 87 PAR'ND °S S BLDG: 14,9 .F. / FL. SITEr. 5, 00 S.F. 1.50 AC ES) \ s9 \ • • SOD i SOD CON CURE, ON AL S.F. 111) ':. PVMT. SHALLAAEETT 'E ST.�Pvim, ITO. BIT. CURB & CUTIERSHALL / ---,MEET. T. EN%G1/TTER_. wri • hi LEVEL LANDING 1.55 MAX CROSS SLOPE FOR ORA/NAGE Sr- M — Mqy 519? 7.5% I 5.00' MIN. ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1 /2' RADIUS MD II_ Y RADIUS ii®RBR1 R SLOPE GUTTER 3/4/1' CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB CURB AND GUTTER (B618) NOTE: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION 2 JOINTS AT 10' -0• D.C. +/— DETAIL NOT TO SCALE C2.0 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDMONS /; • !' \ i c�j5�� �• SOD v.. „ 20' CONCRETE WALK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1/2' W x 3/4" D TOOLED CONTROL JOINT (MAX. 5' 0.C. TV?.) W/ 1/4 RADII. UCHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR 10 TRAFFIC WITH E3" WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED S CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED W1.6 X W1.6 WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS AS SPECIFIED r CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED 511505 DE NOTES: 1. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR UMITS OF WALKS. 2. 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AT CURBS. 3. WIRE MESH REQUIRED FOR WALKS 6' WIDE OR IN LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. BIT. CURB & CUTTER SHALL MEET EXIST. CURB & GU.T TER, BIT. PVMT. SHALL MEET ' - EXIST. PVIAT., TYP. R i FINISHED 01440E DETAIL 1400 TO SCALE 1 C2.0 LOPE GUTTER 3/4 "/1' ONTIN0000 SLOPE CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER PAVEMENT MATERIALS SEE DETAIL RIBBON CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 440101 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10' -0' 0.C. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON 501L CONDITIONS TO CONSTRUCTION AREA PLAN TO CONSTRUCTION AREA FINISHED GRADE 0 MIN CRUSHED STONE 75' MINIMUM 4-- LAYOUT AND PAVING NOTES:- - 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE 2. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN 111E FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. DECORATIVE PAVER LIMITS AND LAYOUT SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD FOR REVIEW 410 APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL SU6MIT COLORS AND MATERIALS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDINGS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH 111E ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 5. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL ENTRANCES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDINANCE 5. PARKING STALLS SHALL BE STRIPED WITH A 4' WOE WHITE PAINTED UNE ALTS201BLE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED UNE; I8' ON CENTER AND AT 45' ANGLES TO THE STALL STOP LINES SHALL BE 24' WI00 WHITE PAINTED UNE. 7. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS SHALL COORDINATE WITH 1140 EXISTING BENCHMARK AS INDICATED ON THE SURVEY/EXISTING CONDITIONS DRAWING. PLANNING NOTES 1. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS SHALL BE SUBMITTED BATH T110 APPLICATION FORM IN SPREADSHEET FORMAT. SEE SPREADSHEET TO COMPARE PERCENTAGE OF PEAK DEMAND FOR KEY TIMES. SIGN SCHEDULE: 0 STOP SIGN (R1 -1) 1I HANDICAPPED PARKING (1 -34A) & 020D FINE (1 -38)) — VAN ACCESSIBLE (147 -6A) MOUNT BELOW SIGN B ® HOTEL CHECK —W, DROP —OFF AND PICK —UP 5" RADIUS 12" DIAMETER 8' UNE WIDTH 3' UNE WIDTH 5' 6' SQUARE OVERALL 15' RADIUS ACCESSIBLE PAVEMENT SYMBOL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FINISHED GRADE GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP OF 2) ENGINEER GRADE REFLECTIVE SCREENED STEEL PANEL AS SPECIFIED GALVANIZED STEEL FLANGED CHANNEL POST AS SPECIFIED PAVEMENT MATERIALS VARY SEE PLAN SLEEVE TO ACCOMMODATE REPLACEMENT POST PROCESSED GRAVEL BASE EXISTING UNDISTURBED CEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC ROADWAY IMES: PROFILE PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABIUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE, REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED. WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SITE TRAFFIC SIGN (STS) DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 12" DIAL CONC. FOOTING. SLOPE TOP OF FOOTING TO DRAIN COMPACTED SUBGRAOE AU G c F, 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION mP/WaOTS..KARRaAU MOP NMnvc.4aoinsr.massamesporets ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 71440i1 C4>A`L IJ .m�sVm. CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC I11^0 SM0.FIYL UYE 94-746005 vn PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 01/16/01 0100 011000044L REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SITE LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C2.0 /H 1 d SEE STORM SEWER - 00NT1NUE0 LAYOUT FOR CONNECTION TO POND IS' • M 102 - 01.77 IE( )= 890,04,. -. IE E)= 889.44 IRRIGATED AREA 152-233" RCP 0 0.15% MATED AREA .12 8 " -45' BEND MH -1 RE-903.50 I0= 893.73 7 / k4 RE= 903.97 IE(W)= 890.48 IE(E)= 890.26 31' -8" PV' 0 0.40% 8' I CONSTRUCTION A9A,tL>? 27' -8" PVC 0 0.40 %. STU6TN A SYNC 4 MA H GRADE 9 160' -30" RCP 0 0.15% SOD CONNECT TO STUB BY OTHERS g -1' •\' //� CONNED /' r �\ • ., /%% i TVA i \ \\ \ 1 \ SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4 , 4' WIRE HOOKED ONTO PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC W111 WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. METAL POST AS SPECIFIED. flLTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED 5ECU8E TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WTTH METAL CUPS 10'0.C. CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL 2 NOT TO SCALE ` C3.0 RUNOFFFF., 1/ \, c0NNE -FIELD \/ 2 .':\S\• -\\14\ ., k\ 41' -2$"" - -- - 0.20% vko : • �\\ 30' -12" RCP 0 0.50% \ / / ,/,_ •-. -79,,,, ________ CB `\ , CBMH \ • € X903.56 \ \ / = IE(� .45 SOD f(W) °t'3'T ^f�` % '�-�� �_� 710N \--i ce ! �-. 7 z CbNHECLTZO STUB 1 1 / S - /I; V/ \. /1 00 %1A % 2 1, Tit t 1 L '( 1 I 1 4 STRUCTURE SCHEDULE: 1 --- 21811017/RF 371E I CASTING• CBMH- 101 96• DIA I R -1542 CBMH -102 72' DIA 1 R-30674-0 / CBMH -103 60• DIA 1 R -3D67 * 00604- 107 48' 010. 1 9- 3057 -0 • NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY OR APPROVED EQUAL STORM SEWER - CONTINUED LAYOUT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE in - 20' 100 VARY 12 " -1 4' ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SOIL, TAMP B*CKFILL DIRECTION OF FLOW METAL POSTS B'-0' O.C. MAX. WRAP 1/4' WIRE MESH AROUND 010 5 OF BOX AND ATTACH TO FRAME. FILL WITH 1 /Y -,' DIAMETER WASHED STONE REPLACE WHEN SATURATED W711-1 SEDIMENT. CATCH BASIN FILTER DETAIL NOT 10 SCALE 204 WOOD FRAME COLLECTED SEDIMENT OUTSIDE CB INLET (LAWN AREAS) GRADE CRATE INLET FILTER BAG BETWEEN FRAME AND GRATE CATCH BASIN INLET NOTE 1) IN LAWN AREAS; USE MESH, WOOD FR41AE BOX, AND STONE FOR INLET PROTECTION (ND BAG REQUIRED) 2) IN PAWED AREAS, USE FILTER BM FOR INLET PROTECTION ( NO MESH, BOX STONE REQUIRED) '5' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL SECURE WTTH ROW DF STAPLES, 10' SPACING, 4• DOWN FROM TRENCH BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4' OR MORE IN DEPTH 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER ENO OF LOWER STRIP AS IN A AND B'. OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP N 4' AND STAPLE 'D• EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED M SILT,•? TRENCH AND TAMPED..• D2001080W OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET - APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL TYPICAL STAPLE /B GAUGE WIRE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PRECAST INVERT MUST BE 1/2 DIAMETER OF THE PIPE AND BENCHES SLOPED 2• TOWARD THE INVERT. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACID SD THAT OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION CP CONE ADO STEPS ARE FACING BOYMST EMI, CAS1M0 AND 4001519 NT RINGS AS SPEOREO. •9ANNOLES SULL 9E PRECAST IN ACCORDANCE MTV 4511 C -478 VARI SECTION SANITARY SEWER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH 019011 OR EQUAL 10' ON DENIER AS APPROVED DT OSHA STEPS SHALL BE 07 0 SO THAT OFF1T 410 7CAt SIT. of CONE AND STEPS ARE FACING DOTMSTREAk Al JOINTS IN UlN40IE TO HAVE '0• MHO RUBBER OASHE1S PRECAST NWERT REQUIRED. PIPE SNAIL BE GUT OLD rune 10114 INSIDE FACE OF WALL NDR -N-SAL HAHN= BOOT OR EQUAL •DIOUOED ONWM9DESADO OUTSIDE. 01080U 1440011ESS 00 PRECAST BASE IS S. FOR 14' DEEP OR LEES AND INCREASES 1• IR 14504055 FOR MDT 4' OF 0EPl11 MANHOLE NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL NOTE VANE GRATE SHOWN DIRECTON OF FLOW 3' NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED. CASTING AND ADJUSTMENT RINGS AS SPECIFIED. 24 "x36 PRECAS DOGHOUSES 5X40, BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE 4- EROSION CONTROL NOTES: --' 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IN ADDITION TO OTHER MEASURES 114AT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDINANCE 2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. THIS MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE CLEANING AND /OR REPLACING 5751065 THAT HAVE BECOME CLOGGED OR NO LONGER FUNCTIONAL AS DETERMINED 131 THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT MONTHLY AND AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASUPE5 TO INSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE EROSION CONTROL 575TEM. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND SATISFACTORY DISPOSAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK AND SOIL STABIUZATION AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 30 L.F. OF SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE OUTLET OF EACH STORM DRAIN PIPE TO CONTROL AND MINIMIZE SILT RUNOFF. LEGEND: 419 42D A-A a22.Am. r 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 5' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION SILT FENCE UMI1S OF ERO5ON CONTROL BLANKET -05- GRADING NOTES: ---- 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABUSH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL 010 CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO LOANING AND SODDING ACT4TIES. 2. UNSUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED, SHALL BE REMOVED 0N0 LEGALLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF -SITE 3. SUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED IN A MANNER AND LOCATION AS APPROVED EY THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOWLIN11 FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS B. LONGITUDINAL SLOPES OF WALKS SHALL BE 50 (MAX) AND 1X (MIN.) AND 20 (MAX) CROSS SLOPE EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON 114E DRAWINGS 7. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON 1111E DRAWNGS. SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL 505519E SURFACE ROUGHENING BY EITHER •ST0RSTEP' GRADING. GROOVING. FURROWING, OR TRACKING TO AVOID RUNOFF VELOCITY AND RECEIVE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. SLOPES LESS THAN 3:1 NOT STABILIZED 18194 VEGETATION SHALL HAVE THE SURFACE ROUGH GRADED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY UNTIL SOD HAS BECOME STABILE AND MATURE AT NO TIME THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT, SHALL SLOPES BE A SMOOTH GRADE OR A COMPACTED SURFACE. 4- UTILITY NOTES: -4' 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTUTES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE EN0NEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS 2. ALL DUSTING UTRITT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' (551- 454 -0002 OR 000- 252 -1156) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF 'STANDAR0 SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE UNE INSTALLATION' AND - SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION' AS PREPARED BY THE OTY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA, AND SHALL CONFORM WITH CITY 8027410 MEATS. 4. REFER TO VIE PLAN FOR CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 5. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) CLASS 52 UNLESS 01440 15E NOTED. 6. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL SE PDLYMNYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) SOR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE0, 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONRET11 PIPE (RCP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURES 9. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SLIMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT 5UMPED ELEVATIONS 10. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11. TYPICAL HYDRANT CONSISTS 0F: HYDRANT, GATE VALVE, 2.5' OF 5• DIP WATERMALN AND ANY HYDRANT EXTENSION. GRATE TO BE 2' BELOW HYDRANT EXTENSIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL CUTTER GRADE 10' TRANSITION EACH SIDE OFT CATCHBASIN. WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE 2. A MINIMUM OF B FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL REQUIRED TD MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1B' VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEVER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL 4' MAX 3' GROUT SECTION 2'X3' CATCH BASIN DETAIL NCT TO SCALE 13. A MINIMUM OF 113 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALI. UTUTIES. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND SIZES WITHIN THE BUILDING MMTH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 15. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF NEW UTILITIES. IRRIGATION SYSTEM, AND UNDERDRAINS WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION G mr0919T 51...MOW MOW 0/405 ncRyf.NNas ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD IEs0T11191177 /510Li CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100 SAMMIE 1.1F OEN RAwr: P9L 9471416] 947141701 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA AU G -(TY OF ISSUE: 09/75/05 CITY SUBMIRAL . REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. 1115 SHEET SHEET TITLE: GRADING & UT0.ITY PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C3.0 r 2005 t (5'4 l\ \ ay \\ �I L \ �� \ 1 , / //•-` 1111 pl\ \ Nil��rr/ -y, IRRIGATED AREA • RIGATEO AREA SOD 9, 1,.• / J / \, - -, _ \ S ` k � • � \'- •' THREE TIMES WID1-I OF ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCAL PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 0184 "08' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120 TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS TRUNN FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1' -2 ABOVE EXISTING GRADE ■• SHREDDED CYPRESS DR CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH 2 FROM TRUNK EGS11NG GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL IF NON— BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACKMLL AS SPECIFIED DD NOT EXCAVATE BELOW 000188LL THREE RTIIMES WIDTH EVVERCRE ETTRpEEL PLANTING DETAIL / 21 NOT TO SCALE \ C5.0 SOD LANDSCAPE MEDIAN — DVERSTORY, MID — STORY. AND UNDER STORY PLANTINGS — NUMBERS OF PLANTS IS DICTATED NY S.F. OF MEDIAN. TYPICAL PARKING LOT ISLAND SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE r ) I J 111/ 1' 20' 1D0 T REE TIMES QUID H OF ROOTBALL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NOT04AL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2 04'08' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWD STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120 TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1' -01 ABOVE EXISTING GRADE 3' SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH 2 FROM TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL IF NON— BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE 84CKMLL AS SPECIFIED D0 NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL 4--- LANDSCAPING NOTES: -4- 1. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION AC1VITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4' MIN. LAYER LOAM AND WASHED SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. AREAS WITHIN STREET RIGHT —OF —WAY SHALL RECEIVE LOAM AND SOD WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. SEE SOD INSTALLATION NOTES BELOW. 2. LOCATIONS OF DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS, AND STAKED IN THE MELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. TREES ANO SHRUBS SHALL BE BALLED AND BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP. 4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4' LAYER OF SHREDDED CYPRU50 OR CEDAR MULCH ON TOP OF A NON— BIODEGRADABLE DIETER FABRIC AND BORDERED WITH 3/16' THICK STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGING. 5. 0/1140 RDEN AND INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE WETLAND SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED. — IF APPUCAOLE. 6. ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4— SODDING INSTALLATION: --0- 1. THE LOAM AND SOIL SHALL BE 4' LAYER MINIMUM, LOOSENED, AND FREE OF CLODS, ROCKS, AND DEBRIS. 2 AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD SHALL BE FERTILIZED WITH 25 POUNDS PER 1000 59.01. (1000 LB /AC) OF 10 -10-10 FERTIUZER AND WORKED INTO THE TOPSOIL 3. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DAMPENED PRIOR TO LAYING TH0 SOO. JOINTS IN THE 50D SHALL BE STAGGERED. AND THE EDGES BUTTED TOGETHER TIGHTLY TO AVOID GAPS BETWEEN SOD LENGTHS. 4. 500 INSTALLED ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER, OR IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOWS, SHALL BE STAKED IN PLACE INSTALL THE 50D WITH THE LENGTH PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATER FLOW FOR SLOPES WITH SHEET FLOW. 5, AFTER INSTALLATION, AREAS SHALL BE TAMPED OR ROLLED TO PROVIDE GOOD CONTACT BETWEEN 50D AND SOIL AFTER ROLLING. THE SOD SHOULD BE WATERED 50 THAT THE SOIL 15 MOISTENED 4 INCHES BELOW 1110 SOD. 4-- SODDING MAINTENANCE: –- 1. IN THE ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE RAINFALL. WATER DURING THE 30 DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING 500 PLACEMENT TO KEEP SOIL MOIST. FOLLOWING THIS INITIAL 3D DAY ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. WATER AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE MOISTURE IN THE ROOT ZONE 2. WHERE MOWING IS DESIRED, MAINTAIN CRASS HEIGHT OF 3 INCHES AND SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED UNTI1 7140 SOD IS FIRMLY ROOTED, USUALLY TWO TO THREE WEEKS AFTER 500 IS LAID. 3. INSPECT AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW ANNUALLY AND F011101010 INTENSE STORMS MAKE NEEDED REPAIR AND REVEGETATE PROMPTLY. 4--- SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS: —4- 1. TEMPORARY SEEDING TO BE 1000 ANNUAL RYE CRASS AND TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN 46 HOURS OF LAST CONSTRUCTION ACDVITY. 7815 APPLYS TO Al). AREAS 200 5F OR GREATER WHICH. THIS I5 TO BE MAINTAINED ONLY AS A TEMPORARY CONDITION. THE FINAL CONDITION OF ALL LAWN AREAS, AND All AREAS NOT TO RECIEVE BUILDING, PAVING OR LANDSCAPE, MALL BE 50D. PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE) PLN1T TOP OF RO018111. 1 -2 ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 4' SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH D0 NOT BURY STEMS 011 TRUNK EXISTING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL 100SENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL—TO —ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACK8LL AS PER SPECIFICATION 00 NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. PLANTING SCHEDULE ' CITY. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DECIDUOUS TREES ROOT SIZE AUG 1 5 2005 s r�= COMMENTS AUTUMN SPIRE RED MAPLE Acer melon, 'Autumn Seine' B&B 2 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM Acer olotanoldes '084118n Who' B&B 2 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM — SUNBURST HONEY LOCUST Gledltdo Tdoconthos Var. Inermis 'Suncole' BBB 2 1/2' CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM — PRAIRIE SPIRE ASH 0rox8 110 oennsvIvonkp 'Rush/ BBB 2 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM TIIo cordota 'Greensolre' — CRIMSON KING MAPLE — GREENSPRE UNDEN BBB 2 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM CONIFERIOJS TREES — COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE Plead PunOmm — EASTERN RED CEDAR Jun'a,arus vironlono BBB 5' HT. STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM BBB 6' HT. STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM ORNAMENTAL IHLES SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE — JAPANESE TREE ULAO — PAGODA DOGWOOD Molue 'Serino Snow' Syringo reticulate BBB 1 1/2 CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM Coma altamlfelio — PAPER BIRCH Betide poperifero BBB 1 1/5 CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM BBB 1 1/2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER— MULTI—STEM B&B 1 1/2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —MULTI —STEM DECIDUOUS SHRUBS COMPACT PJM RHODODENDRON Rhododendron R.J.M. Compost' IVORY HALO DOGWOOD Comus alba 'Boilholo' — UTTLE PRINCESS SPIRAEA Sair,eo Aoonico 'Little Princess' CONT. 36' HT. CONT. 36' HT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 4' 0.0 DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 4' 0.C. CONT. 36' HT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 3' O.C. — COMPACT BURNING BUSH 0801)x040 alotua '180880148 — GREEN VELVET BOXWOOD Buxus x 'Green Velvet - ROYAL BURGUNDY BARBERRY Berber), thinbergii 'Gentry Cultism' CONIFERIOUS SHRUBS CONT. 35' HT. CONT. 24' HT, DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 4' O.C. CONT. 24' HT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 4' O.C. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 3' 0,0. TECH11 ARBORINTAE MUGHO SLOWMGUND Thuia occldentolie'Teahny' CONT. 6' 141. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 5' O.C. — GOLDEN ARBORIVITAE Pinu@Dfusc 'Slowmound Thujp occtdentolle cu — DWARF BWE GLOBE SPRUCE Pisan ounoans 'Globose CONT. 35' HT. CONT. 30' HT. CONT. 36' HT, DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 0,_0 C. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 3' 0.0. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 4' 0.0. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �mRwaiRlalg04'00a sear AA INC NpaI61,l,W 111915,q,V,RM ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD IrP7da1`tVeRJA 1$j r'cf...ru' CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100 SIAGETUFE EWA PRnuuC let 452.746-1.200 952 -HF1ffi PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: e6/15/00 DITY 50180Fµ 0 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C5.0 Luminaire Schedule Proleet: Hotel oty Label 7 HE3 5 HK 5 804Il Description Halal Camino 018 -1 -3XL -400049 Arrangement SINGLE Lumens LLF filename 32000 0.700 GW3x4M.iee Hotel Lumen DM550 -100M01-003 ANGLE 9500 0.700 03M174.1E5 Numeric Summery Prefect Hotel Lobel CaleTbse Untie Ave Max Min Ara/MM 040,1 /Min Hotel only Ilium inanoe Fo 1.48 5.3 0.0 0.00 0.00 --- LIGHTING NOTES: —} rnsaAIMER These calculations are NOT valid for owner or city approval using ony "non-ALD represented product" or fixtures not shown on thin plan. Fixtures must be provided by ALD. Colculations hare been performed with our best Interpretation of the details given to us. Some differences between measured and calculated results may occur due to Intolerances In calculation method., testing procedures. component performance. measurement techniques and field conditions such as voltaoe, temperature varlotlons, lamp monufacturer variations, and other variables Calculations do not take into consideration objects such os, but not limited to. trees, buildings, pavement, sidewalk. or corn. Calculation values represent horizontal (1e. light meter facing straight up) illuminance FC levels (unless otherwise noted). If the real environment conditions do not match the input data, differences will occur between measured values and calculated values. ALD le not responsible for acquiring or interpreting any local lighting code4. These lighting eolculotions ore not a substitute for independent engineering analysis by o professional engineer. TYPE E—Porking Lot Mount Height Project: All Projects S.oNo Label A 12 2 A 12 A 12 4 12 5 12 6 12 7 C 22 C 22 9 C 22 10 C 22 11 C 22 12 C 22 13 D 25 4 0 25 15 0 25 18 17 16 25 33 19 33 20 E 33 21 F 22 F 24 F 25 0 26 27 0 28 29 0 30 31 0 32 0 33 34 2 35 2 36 G 2 37 HE3 33 38 HE3 33 39 HE3 33 40 HE3 33 41 HE3 33 42 HE3 33 43 11E3 33 44 HK 14 45 HK 14 HK 14 47 HK 14 48 14 49 14 TYPE K— Walkway fixture AUG 1 "t 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 01 seveis n]emovirrcen sew. ore iK ehoirninveienieseeeereete ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD EA CONSULTANT: 19EO wee c 001.C. rq nt -me -44141, au- im -itat r.r COMM: SCOW OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12bSPrlElrtff VHF EDEN it l., 1M 9.4461211 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 00/15/05 airy SUBLOTTAL REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE: LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.1 (M )ROOF PEAK. NO ?E: 5AINT ALL PLASTIC ON 54587 157AL VENT5 ON ROOF BLACK CHANNEL LETTERING PER CNN STANDARDS PROVIDE WOOD BLOCKING AS REQUIRED CULTURED STONE FIELD DRESSED 'CHARDO5NAY' METAL BLACK VALLEY FLASHING 170 EXTEND 18' TO EACH SIDE OF VALLEY TYP.) — 158 DECORATIVE WOOD GABLE TRIM WRAPPED u/ WHITE PREFINISHED ALUMINUM PROVIDE ALT. BID FOR WHITE 7551 WHI LOUVER P11 % G RCLEOTOPTE CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT 2408 3 TAB OWENS CORNING CHATEAU GREEN ASPHALT SHINGLES PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. VENTED 50515(7 ROYCE PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS INA OVER 2110 WOOD FASCIA •/ WHIT' 512E551514ED ALUM. WRAP 17YP.1 5' WHITE CORNER TRIM H' WIDE BURGUNDY SHUTTERS ITYP.) VERIFY HEIGHT IN FIELD i' EDCO BRAND 1AF SIDING ANTIOUE PARCHMENT IN COLOR WHI7E PATTERN LATTICE / 1' OPENINGS ITYP.1 3 1/2' WAAITE WINDOW 75)41 ALL WI5D0W5 70 HAVE WHITE 5115(53 CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT 240F 5 TAB OWENS CORNING CHATEAU GREEN ASPHALT SHINGLES PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. VENTED SOFFIT PROVIDE PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS I4 OVER 2110 W000 FASCIA WHITE PP.EPINISH -D ALUM. WRAP ITTP.) 5' WHITE CORNER TRIM H' WIDE BURGUNDY SHUTTERS (TTP.) VERIFY HEIGHT IN FIELD S' EDCO BRAND LAP SIDING ANTIQUE PARCHMENT IN COLOR 8517E 5477555 LATTICE u/ 1' OPENINGS (1151.) 3 1/7 WHITE WINDOW TRIM ALL WINDOWS TO WHITS 5)51514 ROV)05 GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS • ENTRY PORCH 2re DECORATIVE WOOD GABLE TRIM WRAPPED u/ WHITE 54E515154ED ALUMINUM PROVIDE ALT. 50 FOR METAL BLACK VALLEY WHITE TRIM FLASHING (70 EXTEND 28'44' PREFINISHED WHITE 18' 70 EACH SIDE OF LOUVER u/ QRCLE TOP — VALLET 715.) PROVIDE GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS • FRONT PORCH t ENTRY CANOPY CULTURED STONE FIELD DRESSED "CHARDONNAY. ALUM. STOREFRONT ENTRY SYSTEM 81- PARTING u/ NOTION 5ENSOR PREFINISHED WHITE VINYL RAILINGS AND BALUSTERS PROVIDE GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS 51 ENTRY PORCH NORTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: I/O' - 5075: PAINT ALL PLASTIC AND 5HEET METAL VENT5 ON ROOF BL4CK PROVIDE PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS NOTE: PAINT ALL PLASTIC AND 5HEET ETAL VENT5 ON ROOF BLACK METAL BLACK VALLEY FLASHING (70 EXTEND (8' TO EACH SIDE OF VALLEY TYP.) CULTURED STONE FIELD DRESSED - CHARDONNAY' CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT 3108 3 TAB OWENS CORNING CHATEAU GREEN ASPHALT SHINGLES PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. VENTED 5055)7 1# OVER 2140 WOOD FASCIA W/ WHITE PREFINISHED ALUM. IRAP ITYP.) 5' WHITE 005.555 TRIM PREFINISHED WHITE 54114565 AND BALU5TER5 PROVIDE GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS • ENTRY PORCH CULTURED STONE FIELD DRESSED 'CMARDONNAY' 4' EDCO BRAND LAP SIDING ANTIQUE PARC341ENT IN COLOR `PROVIDE GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS FRONT PORCH ENTRY CANOPT j_' 50051 PEAK 5115' L0OR$ NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: I /E' - r -O' ISOU'FH ELEVATION REVERSE) MOW 4M-geWrE, TO IV.TCH Olt REFUSE ENCLOSURE ELEV. AH+I N F F 0 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8' - I' -0' 'MVO roa':TC «lern TO NiTCX ItO REFUSE ENCLOSURE ELEV. *CAM 3 /14• • r -D Ra.R °0514"4X3 Foie.' :MVP TO n.TCH nOTa1 .ND 2117° 14. CtiVrEt To•M¢ATCX noffte _ Ir aT I IWTEI( MT; "T"I REFUSE ENCLOSURE ELEV. REFUSE ENCLOSURE ELEV. aDALC 3/3' FRONT • ■■I.■i■■•IEI.i tilar ■1 imonimma amain nig InEran 4al *LW w;/In► mamma Naa Fligamaziline • MIME ammo ..■ G ImUrsifibi 1 _�a�IU� • u.C�H orimmurre ••••111 ■ ■■ •••••Mall •••om •IMHIREMERI ■ ■ ■"� ■■ ■ ■tai - � ••••••• nummu saw.trainsm. warn =am ■■Minr ■a'tal inn% -i. ■ ■ ■Ai"4a� ■al� ■■ lNli■�ti .1111"5". ■ 1 ■RU ••W■ ■ ■T ■11M ■'°- ■ ■E • I■ Ow: plia ■■L Ibis ■ ■Ea qIF 4 • P 1111.111 111111_.!�ta1��11 ■R1p l�a°y71 JP■! a ■ a4 PORCH POOL MECHANICAL *-K) ct \ \ ------- POOL ROOM CORRIDOR CORRIDOR LOBBY BREAKFAST Itax,ite esa I I / I :1 STORAGE FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE, 1/IP • II-O• 1,141 S.F. OF GUEST ROOMS 1,944 S.F. OF COMMON AREAS 1G,48S S.F. OF TOTAL AREA OF FIRST FLOOR •-L• 3. DIA. - TEEL -GATE- , • STS — PAIR iI-CP,E4 CHAIN LINK GIFiTE ./ SLATS b I REFUSE t 1 -,.. RECYCLING A4F4R-rrl 4.4 rm.-re irrr. LINE OF I Roar ABOVE b I 4 I IFI-O' REFUSE ENCLOSURE PLAN sCA1.£ - r-0. .=■/■ L [1,,, L.-- AUG I; 2005 PCAREIMEV' nmEnk:1: NMM7 0112 O3:32C lell.••••■ 2 •AMM -RillEM nimsoninsmo■ 11111•14111- MBE. MINOMONEMSM InelhiENERMI NOMMIVIMNEi MIMMMINIMME •WINIIM•ME4 IMMO .11Mt12 •••••11•••• INIMMUMMENI MtNEENEVER IMEMINEEMR MNIRMONNIMI •BERMINEMIN. LM•SEEMMIN MGEIMNIMMI• PIFIBIBIRMON EinialiPHEW M•4111.M•1114 SP•MOREIMIR L'EMEMINERRP PROBILIEM/Mil EFORRONEMB) NIMPRIEFEEM ENEMBOLIIIIM 111EMEMBEINNE MG•MIBILEN5 IMMOGU•Ne MOMILMEMIN5 IMIIMROWININ2 N1ANMEIROMM4 ELIMBLIENOR MIINCEMNIM EFRURIMIEIM CONOUBILIMO LiniEN111111111.11.11 NEMBIMIMIEN •111.11117•11104111 11•••11111MEMI ••aci9111663111 111111111m111/Eas IIREMP1111110111111 IMIONIMMAMN "1*.V.INIFAsill 1116:3614-11114N1111 ••1=•1114%11 •••=.1411. ••Nr6llE1111111 MiliC=11•11•11 •••11•11111111•• 11111111111MMils aininia/M11111 •••111W111111111 .111.111.1116044171 11••••liditzul 11111111111112101 INE•11111M- 111•••littairtill NNEININPHOIN MENNIM*INNE •••••zhIMEN •••••••••■ 11•:11111MrrEM.:11 ••N••••NN• NIMORIBIOsAl ••I•M•OMM MENINEMENGIM MENIKAMEIMM IMINEIMINBRIN Moir, •M• . MilkoodEMEMM IMMOMPEMII MICLii.INTOLTM IMMEMIhelOM EMINNOC4MEM IMPORMEN!Ull ENSIMMEMBE ••11111•11114.• ENNINONZBION •NIVii.MMIME •••••1111eMN •MEN•MBERN MAIMI • MOBRIVEREN MINBNP-MUMN IHIMAONMEN ENENYWER11:31 •N1r1:419.1... ENf9irfLUNM1 •MENNO#11.•• MMILMIrrEMES MMOINEMIBRON EME/11411.1.1 NRIIMNIEBMI •NW!!!'"MICe. MINIVIGS4REM ENE1-1)1 FORM 11141711.1".s..1.1171.41111 IMIL=O,BMFA IMOIMWAIPRIN IIMMOMOLIENIGI •ORMIAMMI IN111--2.1EN • •NI INN • COMMONIEBN •MEEIMNBE••N Mi!INMILIENN •••••••••• LEIRTOMINIME •ENE•:1E1MM s NONNIOMIEMS Lh • Mil 1•• • •••NIMMIONI ENMARitil•ME EINVIIKOMME IMNIMMNIMIN • AGENDA ITEM V.E.2 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: September 14, 2005 TOPIC: Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit Final Plan Betty's Pies Legacy at Woods Edge BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a single tenant restaurant within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the restaurant building as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). *Betty's Pies is a full service restaurant that meets the intent of the city's vision for a family oriented, neighborhood gathering place in the new mixed use downtown. Owners Marti Sieber and Carl Ehlenz run the Two Harbors, Minnesota, destination restaurant and this will be their first expansion into the metro area. ANALYSIS Planned Unit Development Betty's Pies Site Plan is located in a Commercial Land Use Area and takes up both lot 3 and part of lot 4 in Block A (according to the land use plan of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide). Acceptable Building Type is Commercial with an overall acceptable density of 6,700 SF minimum and 20,100 SF maximum. Building Floor print requirement is 6,700 SF. Minimum number of floors for all uses is one and maximum number of floors for commercial is 3. The overall area of the building will be 7,935 square feet. The majority of the building itself is single story, with the exception of an office area which is located over the center section of the building. The minimum height requirement of 20 feet is being met along the entire building. The guidelines also require that a minimum of 70 % of the building is constructed along the `build to line' for this block. The proposed building conforms to this requirement. The layout generally follows the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout, with the exception of the combination of lots 3, 4, and 5 to create two lots. The main entry of the building will be from the parking lot, which is atypical for this type of urban development. However, the plaza that is being proposed in combination with the NI/outdoor dining area and the walkway from the street into the site has been determined to sufficiently act as an Betty's Pies, page 2 `entry point' for both this restaurant and the building that will be built on the adjacent lot to the east. The •pplicant has been informed by staff that the continuation of the plaza as shown on these plans will need to occur on the adjacent lot, and that the location of the main entrance away from the street right -of -way will not be something that is allowed in other locations within the development. Building Materials/ Elevations The guidelines limit the blank wall faces to a maximum of 30 linear feet of wall; the window that was added to the Town Center Parkway frontage in the revised drawing brings the project into conformance with that requirement as well as the requirement that 60% of the building face be glass. Since the original submittal the applicant has addressed staff s concerns over the location of the mechanical room access and the use of a faux mansard roof over the kitchen area. As depicted on the revised elevations the access was moved to the driveway side of the building and a parapet wall was added over the kitchen to alleviate these concerns. The guidelines discuss providing a clear base, middle and top to the architecture. With the proposed building, the base is articulated with both stone and brick veneers, the middle of the structure will be either cementious wall board or EIFS; and the top consists of a prefabricated architectural metal roof augmented with a cornice and architectural brackets. Staff finds the materials and architectural style to be in keeping with the design and development guide. Ofhe maximum height allowed by the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide is 44 feet. This building is well within that standard. Another main concern of staff is the use of a retaining wall along the Town Center Parkway street frontage. The submitted plans depict a retaining wall with a height up to 4 feet. This will push the building up away from a pedestrian scale, and therefore the treatment /materials of that retaining wall are essential to keeping the streetscape from being dominated by a blank wall. Landscaping The landscaping plan is deficient in the parking lot medians. Additional trees must be planted with low growing deciduous or coniferous shrub accents. Some of the landscaping materials listed are prohibited by the zoning ordinance or are inappropriate for this area and must be replaced with appropriate materials. Specifically, the Crimson King Maple and the Autumn Flame clump maple should be replaced with one of the species outlined in the Environmental Board memo. The northeast entry should include a light canopied Honeylocust that will allow filtered light to enter the building. The Green Velvet shrub should be replaced with Bush Honeysuckle which is hardier. The Euonymus alatus `Compactus' shrub should be eliminated unless it is being used for screening, since it typically reaches 8 feet in height or greater. Staff is asking that the landscape plan be revised and submitted for review by the city's Environmental Coordinator prior to the item being heard by the City Council. As always, all sodded and planted areas will require irrigation when appropriate. • Betty's Pies, page 3 Outdoor Dining The site is proposed to include an outdoor dining area, which is listed as a conditional use within the commercial district permissible use table of the Town Center Design & Development Guide. The applicant has requested approval of a conditional use permit and can clearly meet all of the conditions listed within the text. Those conditions are as follows: A. Eating Places /Outdoor Restaurants, Clubs and Lodges: 1. Accessory outdoor seating areas: a. The applicant shall submit a site plan and other pertinent information demonstrating the location and type of all tables, refuse receptacles, and wait stations. b. Access to the dining area shall be provided only via the principal building if the dining area is full service restaurant, including table waiting service. c. The size of the dining area is restricted to thirty (30) percent of the total customer floor area within the principal structure. d. All lighting shall be hooded and directed away from adjacent residential uses in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4. F of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. e. The applicant shall demonstrate that pedestrian circulation is not disrupted as a result of the outdoor dining area by providing the following: 1) Outdoor dining area shall be segregated from through pedestrian circulation by means of fencing, bollards, ropes, plantings, or other methods, and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 2) Minimum clear passage zone for pedestrians at the perimeter of the restaurant shall be at least six (6) feet without interference from parked motor vehicles, bollards, trees, tree gates, curbs, stairways, trash receptacles, street lights, parking meters, or the like. 3) Overstory canopy of trees, umbrellas or other structures extending into the pedestrian clear passage zone or pedestrian aisle shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7) feet above sidewalk. f. The dining area shall be surfaced with concrete, bituminous or decorative pavers or may consist of a deck with wood or other flooring material that provides a clean, attractive, and functional surface. g. A minimum width of thirty -six (36) inches shall be provided within aisles of the outdoor dining area. h. Storage of furniture shall not be permitted outdoors between November 1 and March 31. Outdoor furniture that is immovable or permanently fixed or attached to the sidewalk shall not be subject to the storage prohibition of this section. However, any immovable or permanently fixed or attached furniture must be approved as part of the administrative permit application. i. Refuse containers shall be provided for self - service outdoor dining areas. Such containers shall be placed in a manner which does not disrupt pedestrian circulation, and must be designed to prevent spillage and blowing litter. Though the submitted plans do not directly address all of the conditions listed above, it is staff's belief that the area indicated on the site plan for outdoor dining can clearly meet all of the conditions pending selection of •Pecific furniture. Betty's Pies, page 4 This site is a part of what was identified as Block 1 of the Land Use Plan for Legacy at Wood's Edge. As mentioned earlier it will occupy both lot 3 and a portion of lot 4. Within this block 405 parking spaces are being provided (including on- street and underground parking). The restaurant use will require slightly more spaces than what was originally accounted for in the shared parking analysis; however the shared parking analysis shows that at this point only 402 parking spaces will be required by all of the proposed uses on this block once the restaurant is added and the combination of the lots is accounted for. This will obviously change as each lot is developed and staff will verify that each use has the appropriate amount of parking available. As a stand alone use this restaurant would require 57 parking spaces, within the first phase of development on this block the parking lot includes 97 spaces and is therefore adequate to serve the restaurant. Lighting The photometric lighting plan meets the guidelines of the Town Center Design and Development guide, however some of the fixtures themselves do not. 90 degree cutoff lighting is required and is not always used, specifically the wall mounted lighting on the north side of the building. The mounting height of the lighting is also not indicated. All pole mounted lights within the parking lot are limited to a maximum height of 20 feet, and all other pole mounted lights used for walkway or other lighting are limited to a maximum height of 14 feet. A revised lighting plan indicating conformance with these standards must be submitted. Engineering Alk IP The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is S.E.H., and a memorandum including all of their comments is attached to the report. The issues addressed in that memorandum are the main reason staff is recommending to continue this item to the next regular meeting. These issues may not directly affect the final layout of the site, but still need to be addressed prior to city staff feeling comfortable making a recommendation on the item for the Planning and Zoning Board. Final Plat The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) is attached as to the same agenda as a separate item, and a condition will be added to this review that the final plat must be approved prior to City Council approval for this building. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31St regular meeting. Their comments are attached and are addressed in the landscaping portion of this report. RECOMMENDATION 1. Staff recommends that this project be continued to the October 12, 2005 regular meeting. • .ATTACHMENTS • • 1. S.E.H. memorandum dated September 2, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Betty's Pies plan set received August 15, 2005. 4. Betty's Pies revised elevations received August 30, 2005. Betty's Pies, page 5 • September 6, 2005 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: SEP 0 6 2005 RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Betty's Pies Site Plan Review SEH No. A- L1NOL0305.09 14.00 Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Betty's Pies site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on August 15, 2005. Plaza Enlargement Layout Plan (Sheet C2.1) 1. A note on the plan indicates the fence posts on top of the retaining wall will be core drilled and grouted into place. It is instead recommended to attach the fence posts to the wall by utilizing mounting brackets. This would allow for easier maintenance and replacement if required in the future. 2. The ornamental fence detail is not clear or readable and appears to have pickets missing. Contact SEH for an AutoCad drawing of the fence for use in the final plans. 3. ADA requirements state that 4 accessible parking stalls and access aisles shall be provided for a lot with between 76 and 100 parking stalls, with at least one van accessible space served by a 96" wide minimum access aisle. Only one accessible parking stall is shown with no access aisle. The pedestrian curb ramp is located directly in front of the accessible parking stall where it will be blocked by the parked vehicle. This curb ramp should be relocated to the access aisle and accessible parking meeting all applicable ADA standards must be provided. Erosion Control and Grading Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. The use of steps to access the building and plaza area from Town Center Parkway should be avoided if at all possible. It is recommended that, if feasible, a ramp meeting ADA standards be utilized. 2. The southerly parking lot entrance to Town Center Parkway needs to be regraded and raised slightly to match the proposed grades for the roadway improvements on Town Center Parkway. 3. Further detail of proposed grades and spot elevations in the plaza area should be given. It appears that the cross slope on the plaza varies from a high of 3.7% at the plaza gate to 2.57% at the easternmost entrance to the building. This exceeds the maximum cross slope of 2% as set forth in ADA accessibility requirements. 4. The walk directly outside of the main entrance has a slope of approximately 6.4% to the parking lot. The accessible route from the accessible parking stall to the main entrance will encounter cross slopes varying from approximately 3.5% to 6.4 %. These slopes exceed the maximum cross slope of 2% as set forth in ADA Accessibility Guidelines. • • • • Mr. Michael Grochala September 2, 2005 Page 2 5. Approximately 45 feet of the sidewalk between the northwest side of the building and the parking lot has a slope that is graded toward the building. 6. According to the detail provided on Sheet C2.1 and the contours and spot elevations on Sheet C3.0, it appears the concrete seat wall will reach a maximum height of approximately 1.3 feet near the steps and decrease to almost 0 feet near the main north entrance, with over half of the length of the wall being under 0.5 feet in height. Further clarification on the detail and grading must be made. 7. It appears that no provisions are being made to capture storm water runoff from the plaza area. According to the plans, storm water runoff will flow away from the building to the seat wall, then along the seat wall to the southeast, finally spilling off the edge of the retaining wall and on to the public sidewalk. The storm water runoff must be captured on site and must not be allowed to spill uncontrolled onto the public sidewalk. 8. The proposed retaining wall exceeds 4 feet in height and will need to be designed by a registered structural engineer. 9. The southeast corner of the large central island (containing the pervious pavers and Netlawn) has a rather flat spot in the gutter line from the indicated spot elevations of 906.09 to 906.01. It appears this slope is less than 0.5% and could be increased without detriment to other parts of the parking lot grading, thus creating a more positive drainage flow around the gutter line to the pervious pavement area. 10. All gutter slopes shall be at least 0.5 %. 11. A high point should be created in the east entrance, at the parking lot, to prevent parking lot storm water runoff from flowing down to Town Center Parkway. 12. The parking island north of the main entrance to the building will trap water in the western corner. The island should be regraded to alleviate this problem. Utility Plan (Sheet C4.0) 1. The pervious pavement system is shown as being partially constructed with this phase. It is unclear how, in a future phase, the rest of the pervious pavement system can be connected into the existing system from a constructability standpoint. It appears that the entire pervious pavement system must be constructed with this phase unless an alternative construction method can be demonstrated and submitted for City approval. 2. Silt fence or other approved means must be utilized to prevent siltation of the pervious pavement system by runoff from the unpaved areas to the north. 3. All catch basin leads must be at least 15 -inch diameter. 4. The slope of the storm sewer outlet pipe to Town Center Parkway is shown connecting to the existing stub at 1.79 %. The existing stub is shown on the Legacy at Woods Edge — Phase 1 plans as being at 1.00 %. The applicant shall coordinate with SEH in revising both the stub and proposed private storm sewer to match grades. 5. The detail for the sanitary sewer manhole should include Infi- Shield neoprene boot (or equal) around casting and rings. Also include a note allowing a minimum of 2, maximum of 5 adjusting rings. 6. Sanitary manhole #2 will require an outside drop as it exceeds the City maximum of 1' difference between inlet and outlet elevations. • • • Mr. Michael Grochala September 2, 2005 Page 3 7. It is recommended that the location of the 6" — 11.25 degree bend for the hydrant Lead on the west entrance be relocated closer to the hydrant so the water main can remain parallel to the curb through the entrance. This will maintain the maximum distance away from the curb to allow for any potential future excavation needs without disturbing the curb. 8. Provisions should be made for looping of all water main which will be connected to the Town Center Parkway or Village Drive water service stubs. In this case, the two stubs being extended from Town Center Parkway must be looped together. No dead end water main runs will be allowed. 9. It is recommended that the sanitary sewer services be connected to the sanitary service using wyes rather than direct connection into a manhole. A manhole should be provided upstream of the service connections for flushing purposes. 10. All roof drains must be shown on the plans so that drainage patterns can be verified. 11. The plans give no indication that roof storage is to be used for storm water rate control. The usage of roof storage to hold runoff from a 2.8" storm event was one component of the hydrology model submitted to and approved by Rice Creek Watershed District and is an integral part of the hydrologic design submitted by Hartford in this submittal. Without roof storage, the central pond/infiltration basin, as currently shown, will be undersized. Roof storage and rate control for a 2.8" storm event must be utilized on this building consistent with the hydrology model submitted by Hartford or revised hydrology models must be submitted for review. General Comments 1. Details need to be shown for all engineering items, such as gate valve installation, pavement cross - sections, pervious pavers, etc. 2. The applicant shall furnish supporting documentation to verify truck turning movements can be accommodated in the parking lot. Please call me at 651.490.2147 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Robert L. Moberg, PE Project Manager nm x:\ko \linol\ 030509 \plan review \bettyspies090205 - engineering.doc Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board August 31, 2005 Legacy at Woods Edge Bettys Pies: Plant Schedule: Deciduous Trees list has two species that should be reconsidered for change. Crimson King maple is a Norway maple and of borderline hardiness. Norway maples are also listed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as invasive to our native woodlands. Suggest changing this species to one of the following -- Northern Pin Oak, Red Oak, Bur Oak, Autumn Blaze Maple, Hackberry, American Linden, and Green Ash. The Autumn Flame clump Maple is also a woodland invader and is getting established in some of our native woodlands. Amelanchier or Service berry, Ironwood, any of the disease resistant, fruit persistent flowering crabs, might be substituted for this species. Erosion Control: The developer should submit an erosion control plan that details NPDES requirements and is acceptable to the City. The plan and inspections reports for this plan must be located on site with an indicated location on the plan. VICINITY MAP aJ 4/ 47 ABBREVIATIONS 41 XL AC. ACOUSTIC F.O. AR. ACOUSTIC TILE FEE ADJ ADJACENT OR ADJUSTABLE F.E 400.0. ABOVE 4NISHED FLOOR FUR. ALUM. ALUMINUM FLAN. ALT. ALTERNATE AT GA A.P. ACCESS PANEL GALV. ARCH. ARCHITECT GW. • AT GYP. B0. BOARD H.C. BLOC. BUILDING HOOP. ILK. BLOCK HORD. 9LKG. BLCDKING N.M. ROT. BOTTOM HORIL CA CASINO NR. CPI. CABINET IBC CDM. CEMENT 1NSUL CER CERAMIC IM. C.I. CAST IRON JAN. CL.G. CEILING JST. CL CLOSET tr. COL. COLUMN KO. GONG CONCRETE LAV. COAST. CONSTRUCTION UN. CONY. CONTINUOUS AWN, CONTR. CONTRACTOR MANUF. CORR CORR00R MAX CPT. CARPET CR. GAB) READER C.T. CERAMIC TILE C.W. CASEWORK DEL DETAIL DIM. OMENSKJN MTL DR ODOR N.I.C. DW. DISH WASHER N.TS. MOS. ORAWIN05 N0. EA EACH NOM. EL. ELEVATION 0.0. D.EV. ELEVATOR 0.0. ELEC. ELECTRICAL O.H. MR. 040040TR P.C. ENT. ENTRANCE PL E0. EQUAL PLAIN EQUIP. EQUIPMENT PR EXIST 0%67110 PT 001. EKPOSED OR EKPAN90N O.T. EXT. FX1ERIEN R. Ef W /MK; DOWN, W /MIC REF. TEFL FLOOR DRAIN FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FIRE DaINOU0NER 84100E FURNACE GAUGE CALVANIZED GROSS WEIGHT GYPSUM HOLLOW CORE HANDICAP HARDWOOD H0L10N METAL 80610000AL HOUR INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 05ULAT10N INTERIOR JANITOR JOIST JOINT KICK DONN LAVATORY LINEN CLOSET MNNIANENCE - MANUFACTURER MECH. MECHANICAL *ED. CAB. MEDICINE CABINET MFR. MANUFACTURER IN. MINIMUM MASONRY OPENING MATERIALS + SYMBOLS NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE NUMBER NOMINAL ON CENTER 0UTSIDE DIAMETER OPPOSITE HAND PRECAST PLATE PLASTIC LNAINA1E PAR PAM 0R palm MARRY TILE RADU6 REFERENCE OR 804330ERAToR REFLECTED RUNG. MINE. REV. RED' R0. 800 S.C. SECT. SF. 5841. SUM. 5 W/D SPEC. STD. SR S10R. 51RUC1. N. T@0 T.O. T.P. 06 TUB T.V. 1114. UBC UN0 V.C.T. V.B. VEST. VEST. 2606 N.C. WD 6.R W/0 YD. REFRIGERATOR REINFORCED REVISION REQUIRED RANGE/OVEN ROD AND SHELVE SOLID CORE OR SECURITY CAMERA SECTION SQUARE FEET SHEET SIMILAR SINK Nam DISPoSAL SPcoricK10 0 STANDARD STEEL STORAGE STRUCTURAL SLEVE MNYL TONGUE AND GROOVE TOP OF TOILER RAPER OISPENSOR BATHTUB TELEVISION TYPICAL UNIFORM BUILDING CODE UN= NOTED SE VINYL FLOOR COVERING VAPOR BARER VERTICAL VEST80LE VINYL WALL COVERING WAINSCOT WATER CLOSET 6000 WATER RESISTANT WITH WASHER/ DRYER WITHOUT TARO a . J CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOC( JMLTAL STUD PARTITION ® 8N5HED W000 b< Ii1E1 + 100.0' 1100.0'1 ROUGH WOOD OR BLOCKING BLOGBNC OR SHIM WOOD STIR PARTITION SOIL BORING MSIING GRADE ELEVATION NEW GRADE ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES I rTZ 1II.liE SAND EARTH GRAVEL PLYW000 STEEL BATH OR LOOSE RU. B19JLA1100 RICO INSULATION ACOUSTIC T6.E - / 0101 40 GRADE CONTOUR NEW GLIDE CONTOUR $- ELEVATION DETAIL N0. SHEET NO SECTION OR 0011611(94 DIRECTION 1110CA7I004 <>-- y- WALL T7PE WI ----- WINDOW TYPE / LQLI ODOR NUMBER ORTCE -8008 DESORPTION ROOM NUMBER BETTYS PIES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE TOWN CENTER DRIVE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PROJECT TEAM OWNER LEGACY M00DIINC5- LLU.0 EipWEM SLE4 JACK BRUIT (652) 745 -1202 JBRANDTOHAlOFORDGR .COI ARCHITECTURAL. 89MCES 111(4-119;1171117MI1711;;;;;474:1- ANL 119,0% �H� v miff ' FIOII 1 ■1 �� FIUMNIMMIMIUMMENINMEMIMIThillEUMIUMEMMEMNR, 10110,14, 111111111P[ IOU HARTFORD CROUP, M. ARCHITECTS /ENGINEERS 12100 SINGLETRL1 LANE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 HAL PIERCE NA (952) 786 -1206 HPERCEOWRTF01i0CRP.COM STRUCTURAL ENCLINEEPEO HARTFORD CROUP, INC. ARCH11EC15/EN0NEERS tEDEN PRAIREEE, MN .553394 CARP C. RENHO D PE (652) 746 -1237 GMNHOLOCHARTFOf SORP.COM NECtNAACAL ENON lO EECTRY'AL Ei+0+1EE3i240 LANDSCAPE ARCHRECTIRAL BRACES MECHANICAL BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,935 S.F. SITE: 0.29 ACRE TOWN CENTER PARKWAY HARTFORD CROUP, INC. ARCHITECIS/ER4NEERS 12100 5840100REE UNE PICK SWRVER LIN 55344 AS A (652) 746 -1210 PSAVEROHARIFOROGRP. W M CIVIL E3JCR10 NNTDTJRD CROUP, NC. ARCHITECTS /0400EER0 1210D SNGLETREE LAN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 AARON ARCHBOLD, PE (052) 746 -1217 MARCHBOIDOWJTFDRDGRP.0011 (EOTEQtOCAL SEFIVICEB Ran Shatter Braun Intertea 11001 Hampshire Ave. 5. Minneapolis. MN 55438 (52) (952) 995 -2100 rehafferObmuncarp.com E NVRWIAENTAL 0884CEB Kevin Hoffman Braun 1802520 11001 Hampshire Ave. 5. Minneopofe, MN 55438 (952) 985 -2200 NhoRmanabreunintertec.4vm SHEET INDEX 11 TIRE SHEET Lb1L 01.0 EXISTING SURVEY PLAN I C1.1 DOSING SURVEY PLAN II 01.2 EXISTING 00145mON5 PLAN C2.0 LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN C2.1 ENLARGED LAYOUT PLAN C3.0 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PUN 04.0 U1LRY PUN C4.1 PHOTOMETRIC UGHRNG PUN C5.0 LANDSCAPE PUN ABEEMEAL- 61.0 ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT PUN A2.0 ARCHITECTURAL MEZZANINE AND COUNG PLAN A3.0 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 01.0 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN 52.0 MEZZANINE AND LOWER ROOF PLAN 53.0 UPPER ROOF PLAN MECHANICAL n Z ECAI bt AUG 1 5 2005 CITY OF !NO LA FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER Ain HARTFORD �Iw I bevy ter* tl.d 8i Pkr. smile ien ia mat so {morel by e, N under es Mrta euprriion ak Sal I am a 4MJ Wand Mail. Isar es Ions of b Mate al Winn.. 14 .M N Rem RyNae+ WINO CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 121009X0£1808 LYE E00* 005M awi 9e'RIOo PR 941.1200 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 8 -15 -05 - OTT R6YIEW SET C REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER: T1 14) cone err eetf.'mePoRD egsNE.bcM101111:07,80011019MMLOMMIA 30U \DARY & TOPOGRAPHIC & THE 12100 SINGLE TREE LANE, SUITE 114 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 -7933 VICINITY MAP EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION _NOTES: - \VE \TORY SURVEY NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE (Mren1 hot ft 2 Mot cmlmr M Datum - ay.0. y 001 Velum - earrogphy own Wanted o 51.10 by E4 Rod t Rore batmen Marty and Anquel or 2001 eaaaaal 0tum. - end ^.,000 noon.. may MMSI N. bsr.fif 0.61 sham brew, NA a, Is oS end on open r. a may Mel a ad ores commitment 1 hoses. fib weY ,. wb(.M fe !tone.. an e 01 aerioue provernente s ,0 eM. t11lo .palm. - CMe fvd lm4a and 0770. e t y and bock of curt Hound eMMhq buldhgs Hal IOeoled. - Cu. wb Mele .as IGn M Ma Ion and buck of curt LEGEND O tr. Monument s O 0amlee lal Mmm unt SM g Denotes Sol! Bemp • Denotes County. Monument • 000tH 0M - Domes SIgn eL amts OM, Pale P Oral. Sbel >15,I VI o etes One Meter O notes u1Mh tae O DBMS Cable Ib. O Denotes Tdmhme 000 ® Denote, Sandmy Seen Mmhd. O e .r Mena. ttenettair Storm t4 ...rams Cate Valve )1 Donors Th. N„knf 3 Donate 0>Nles Comber Omen Overhead INe Omelet SenSery Soars D*MS Slam Sewer Omale See., Fonn ••611.2 Denotes EMSfbp Llewellyn. Dmolm Ten CM& Deno. peril Donets Cmaelo Donors Bllumhos (i5- Moots i Ondee Nellvd TRFF AFTAII OenMe 0evolla0 e Ly *000. Tree ame. Oemles i ce c males F MtlMs . Typo Note: Minder albM�asPees boated vnd hd6M of \A \1\1 N� 00 h �rldyb9. 6 01 b ,•401. Ifolf sect. T L 0 0 F 0 0J .y • M�ieaarmameno :aapuaw,eL��■kdt�:c BUCK 0 M \6lpr1PO31701VS03170_hndry -LSndp )/11/!66] 0,4507 M QT purer ow go KO MO 0311Pee, 04-011-03 Mot sr Q fpra 76Jo0_erwr >44Wc PAW= AS sera. eeM edA adlb 054 DIY eR OAR 0 ®•IFM BY hmeby Mlfy 1tm1 MN sun,, pin or span wen p9eH by tens mite rr elect noperderon and that I an My RmeNtet Land Sarre. ends Ma lows of Ms Was of Mansats 1ASrn E. MA [Mn: Rea Ns 41570 PHOTO 1 PHOTO 2 PHOTO 3 PHOTO 4 PHOTO 5 PHOTO 6 PHOTO 7 PHOTO 8 SURVEY PLAN 0100 ri RUD & SONS, INC. E.G. URN 1.1. 9111VEY1! 9180 T AVE. NE P4100 04 CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014 A MN seas root PW nfor SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS BOU \DARY & TOPOGRAPHIC & TREE I\1VE \TORY SURVEY FOR: HARTFORD GROUP, INC. 12100 SINGLETREE LANE, SUITE 114 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 -7933 PHOTO 9 PHOTO 10 PHOTO 11 PHOTO 12 PHOTO 13 PHOTO 14 NORTH :: GRAPHIC SCALE 19-1 d 1 W e tl R MATCHJNE, SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS S N\1\IP� N GN f 0 Z 0 A 11 wen o.. .l e.M we 0 F LEGEND • Dnal« Men Memm. OM D « hen Moment Sal Ip Nnalm See Bnring ▪ Onnelas County Mammal ® 0.41. Well m.l. Sign b 0nelm WOO Pole Senates Snob Wel Omel« G3re Meter CMOs WSJ Bay Onnelas Om omele. Telachana Boy Omaha MSc. Srm 0errolm QMtlr Beets Nn M. On.l« Slam Sew. Mnh.f. C4 Derbies yl. 71T Malay tie Mprnl f13 ISEINIASE M pr0Jl0317 PSftO1)0 I.Wy -SOpo d.g 9/11 /¢003 114517 MI CST .Q I1 N6 ONmp1MItM0 -4, Oy0 b00N4l.dF_Msd. Om Or S OS CATE OLSMeWINN 148 45.W VICINITY MAP EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION WETR1 BENCHMARK NOTES: - 2 feet Colo. Mlxwl - aynp.plo COMM A. Odd by CO Mud R Sam MI* MM and 8oguel M 2001 - BbaMgb lien era n one.. datum. - Mle as.y we fen, d nlDwut M. bnere of tine work E.«nnts Npr.fnnc.s orb s.mMmb« may e 5 M O fe Masbe. ham+. M. save N abbe to Pen mob.. •MM. - Cola.* fuel es wbi. er4rewnnle or u Ong buOPme net lemf.i - Cu. bale me Mud at al rap end Ca. of dbt TREE DETAIL - Denote EtewVn SS aubitIty o � Omnetn In moors Mm Tree Type Robe bebbed b bred. and g e« nr boated rte eat Y 90. by storm Pln or r4ort we bobbed by no or ends m• M 5.tOblve4 Lewd Sum ands Ibe law. of Me Slate of Mbneele. JASON E. BUD Dete: Ne. Ns 41578 SURVEY PLAN C1.1 E.G. RUT & SONS, INC. LAND SURVEYORS 9180 LEXINGTON AVE NE CIRCLE PINES MN 55814 to (tit) te-ms Fu 11.1 teFeey SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS • I. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY BASED UPON PROPOSED OTT IMPROVEMENTS AND SITE CONDITIONS AT THE 118E OF SUBMITTAL E THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND CLEARLY DISPLAY Al PERMITS AND APPROVALS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTOR ACTIVITIES S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE 014E CALL' (B51- 454 -0002 OR 800 -250 -1186) AND UTIUTY COMPANIES TO NOTIFY LOCATION OF NEW UTILITIES 48 HOURS MINIMUM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. 1H0 CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY PROPERTY, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SURVEY INFORMATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES THAT WALL IMPACT PROJECT WORK. 5, EXIST1140 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE FLAGGED AND PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTOR CONTRACT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. DAMAGED OR MISSING MONUMENTS OR CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER 'cil• HARTFORD SUM TM Sane M. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR STE SECURITY THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. DAMAGED OR VANDALIZED STOCKPILE SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE DEVELOPER. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTOR ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO IDENTIFY AND PROTECT ON -SITE STRUCTURES AND VEGETATION I00411E1ED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE RETEAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. B. IF NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTOR FENCE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGNEER/LANOSCAPE ARCHITECT. LIMOS OF CONSTRUCTION DEUNIAIE GENERAL. POSITION OF TEMPORARY FENCING. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE FENCE ON OR NEAR THE SURVEYED PROPERTY UNE SO AS TO NOT 181081ER WIN CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS. ®a>.mo1E20m. S l ° GROW AK, we amentersmazremsnumets CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS —LL, LLC ISM SIcrlief E wR28n4 511111:10, P1k SI52-14.2200 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: e -15-05 - OTT REVIEW SET REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVAL PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C1.2 NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) NOT IN CONTRACT LIMIT OF 8512 CURB AND GUTTER LIMIT OF 81111MINOU PAVEMENT 8612 CURB FOR rMl. ENTRE ISLAND C OT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) N CURB AND GU SHALL MEET EXISTING CURB (TIP.) 5' R NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) PAVEMENT MARKING -SEE _ (TIP.) L4 . o` U010„, /i 6612 CURB FOR ENTRE ISLAND C7 _ 121IL D,F.P..7NS - 15' R 84 151957.8910 E 539775.7625 S>RU/ BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-'' SHALL MEET EXISTNG PAVEMENT NOT IN CONTRACT (5.1.0.) • /b -(f-- LAYOUT AND PAVING NOTES: -» ' 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE. E LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. DECORATIVE PAVER UMITS AND LAYOUT SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT COLORS AND MATERIALS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDINGS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 5. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL ENTRANCES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDINANCE 6. PARKING STALLS SHALL BE STRIPED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED UNE. ACCESSIBLE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE PAINTED NTH A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED UNE: 18" ON CENTER AND AT 45' ANGLES TO THE STALL. STOP LINES SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE 7. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS SHALL COORDINATE NTH THE EXISTING BENCHMARK AS INDICATED ON THE SURVEY/COSTING CONDITIONS DRAWING LIMIT OF CON5753011Oi - 0' NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) .ux/ / /‹.4 BITUMINOUS PAVEM SHALL MEET EXIST PAVEMENT CURB AND GU SHALL MEET EXIST CURB (TIP.) BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,935 S.F. SETE' 029 ACRE N 1 1636.502 540081.5077 560.3 MECHANICAL r�I 1/2" RADIUS 15 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII119!I; :JAIL* rE t 11A11= 11�IIr =il. 1" WEARING COURSE TACK COAT 2" BASE COURSE 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FINISHED GRADE HIIL - -��I_ 3" RADIUS CORNERS 1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER 3/471' CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB CURB AND GLITTER (B612) NOTE: 1. INSTAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10' -O" O.L. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 N 1517 E 539818.4171 LOPE GUTTER 5/471' ONTINUOUS SLOPE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ,-PAVEMENT MATERIALS SEE DETAIL NOTE: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10' -0" 0.C. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS �I�iit7i.t�( RIBBON CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE �I. y�v 1/2 "612" STEEL ROD WITH SLEEVE 2' 0,0. 3" WIDE SMOOTH STEEL TROWEL FINISH 1/4" TOOLED RADIUS 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE WALK AS SPECIFIED RIGID NON- BINMINDUS JOINT FILLER EXPANSION JOINT NOTE: CONTROL JOINT 1. CONC. WALK SHALL HAVE 3 STEEL RODS MIN. 2. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED 30 FT. MIN. 0.0. AND AT THE END OF EACH DAYS POUR. LEVEL LANDING 1.55 MAX. CROSS SLOPE FOR DRAINAGE yh, MAX SL 55 . / @• , RPM 7316 5.00' MIN I X MAti qh LOP ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 EZINZlig MMitArlra TE=D u= II-11 1�11�11 =11 III- -�I CONCRETE WALK DETAIL NOT TO 5 ^3600 0 1/2" W R 3/4" D TOOLED CONTROL JOINT (MAX. 5' O.C. 1YP.) W/ 1/4" RADII. LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC WITH 3" WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED EDGE 5" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED W1.6 X W1.6 WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS AS SPECIFIED 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 2. 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AT CURBS. 3. WIRE MESH REQUIRED FOR WALKS 6' WIDE DR IN LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULAR TRAFT10. B r/ _7 %5'. 4/ tk 3" WIDE SMOOTH STEEL TROWEL FINISH 1/2" W X 3/4" D TOOLED JOINT LIGHT BROOM FR415H PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC WITH 3" WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED EDGE FINISHED GRADE SITE TRAFFIC SIGN (STS) DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 20 PLANNING NOTES: 1. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION FORM IN SPREADSHEET FORMAT. SEE SPREADSHEET TO COMPARE PERCENTAGE OF PEAK DEMAND FOR KEY TIMES. SIGN SCHEDULE: ® STOP SIGN (R1 -0) ® HANDICAPPED PARKING (1-346) 6 9200 FINE (L -39) ® TEMPORARY PARKING ONLY SCHEDULED WASTE PICKUP AREA (POST SCHEDULE ON SON) ® EXIT ONLY - SEATED FOR PAYING 000109ER5 GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP OF 2) ENGINEER GRADE REFLECTIVE SCREENED STEEL PANEL AS SPECIFIED GALVANIZED STEEL FLANGED CHANNEL POST AS SPECIFIED PAVEMENT MATERIALS VARY SEE PLAN SLEEVE TO ACCOMMODATE REPLACEMENT POST PROCESSED GRAVEL BASE 12" DIA. CONC. F00T1NG, SLOPE 705 OF FOOTING ' TO DRAIN COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO CONSTRUCTON AREA AUG 5 2005 A 25' R PLAN TO CONSTRUCTION AREA FINISHED GRADE 6" M N CRUSHED STONE 75' MINIMUM 25' R LXISTIN0 UNDISTURBED CEDTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC =as PROFILE PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANS0014 BETWEEN STABIUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A 0090110N WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE REPAIR AND CLEANOIT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 1111. IlAvlly= lq II ROADWAY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 6" RADIUS 12 DIAMETER 6" UNE WIDTH 3" UNE WIDTH 5' 6" SQUARE OVERALL 16" RADIUS ACCESSIBLE PAVEMENT SYMBOL DETAIL 4 1 NOT TD SCALE 4, C S 6 r n T ■g T 6 1 A N.cnORD PROW, .R x.4110 420 3,1.167.4:560 0•INEst,S ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD saut S. of icia.mee.wx 8,01 fac 116,04-1101 1 6nq' walk Wet* Elm, csScim 6TH t4 wM 1831140 8 6,48 ro LIcemlloWattm AWNN vdN 1M M N We VW N Mood,. 8184 Katow m NL P904 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LLE LLC 12 FGD6NGLEN EE UJE RR,NN 9 m P 861Ott 952- )W120O PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 8 -15 -65 - alt REVIEW SET REV. THLS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SITE LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C2.0 „,,,,,,,,..„ ..yr.„,-, 3 -{w A sa„ \ A nvoa .. - ∎ x 6 MIiM.7mP••_:� V ,- 1, - ., ,, :-.4 k..<1., '0 ,,, or- , ing.... ir,grimbe.T.,,,, 4 4..„ _.....-7:-: r - '..,:. ,w1 4,1,-.4, kigg k„, ,W- -- . 7 4 %.- , ,... !.., mi. „,..„ ...„,„,..„,,...„,,.,,...,...„ : ,...„..,...1,,,t....„. 1 ...... _ .... IINI n. HJ...■. .... ■.....■..... ■.n ■ ■ .�oM %....I DECORATIVE PAVEMENT TYPE III FOR PURUC WAIL(. PATTERN SHALL BE HERRINGBONE PAVERS WITH BORDER. COLOR AND MATERIAL/ SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY 2' MOE CONCRETE SERPENTINE LAYOUT SEATING WALL -SEE �j�GR PUN &�7e NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) ORN PAVEMENT BAND. INSTALLATION ND SHALL MAINTAIN PRIORITY P ENCE ABBU771810 ADJACENT PAVEMENT______ CT BORDERS. MATERIAL AND COLOR O"/,/ SMA11 BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER • �\0i 4'04' STEEL TREE GRATE WITH UGNT 31011188 AND Sri IRRIGATION OPENING (TTP.) 4 �,� �. \ •ft, II. MATERIALS AND COLOR SHALL BE x , 4' APPROVED BY 100 OWNER AND THE �\ ��� \. CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION EXTERIOR UGHTINC BEE UGHTING PLAN (TYP BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,935 S.F. SITE: 0.29 ACRE • elf , K ' ! t- I o_ I I I � ,1 I L� 1 ,� \ 1 . 1- I � � CONCRETE STAIR , SEE GRADING PLAN 12” WOE CONCRETE LANDSCAPE EDGING ORNAMENTAL TREES T It • ' ) yJam. CONCRETE STAIR ).'.< SEE GRPDINC.PLAN f�. DETAIL AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ORNAMENTAL FENCE DETAIL , DETAIL y/. `'R0 JNI j \ SEE 0RAD1NC.4uN X4' 'BASE 09 VERTICAL FOR PIER SHALL 90 'CONCRETE LMEN .,PIER FAR VERTICAL GATEWAY 8040 !`, BE APPROVED MATERIAL, SIZA, AND COLOR SHALL \�/ BE APPROVED BY THE 41 CITY. GATEWAY ELEMENT / \ MATERIALS SHALL CH ORNAMENTA L RAILING. .JOOLZR, DESIGN, L BE A PROVED BY AND i'- "!?ATERIPLS SHALL BE APPROVED BY 111E CITY. APPROXIMATELY 165 LF. ORNAMENTAL•' /• RAILING: -PANEL DESIGN SHALL MATCH ;PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FENCE BY THE /'ii '-CITY. FINISH COLOR SHALL MATCH -7-HARDWARE OF THE SITE AND APPROWD ' BY 111E OWNER AND CITY: CORE DRILL POSTS INTO TOP OF RETAINING WALL WITH NON 94RINK."8RCUT. (TYP.) ORNAMENTAL PAVEMENT BAND. MATERIAL AND COLOR SHALL BE ED Y-114E OWNER (TYR.) 4'X4' STEEL TREE GRATE WITH LIGHT FIXTURE -AD / IRRIGATION OPENING ��/ ;`2 � LOCATION OF RETAINING WALL SHALL ABUT CITY IMPROVEMENT WALNWAy^MATERIALS VERIFY WITH THE -CITY LIMITS OF PROPERTY \� CITY STREET 11 0TH IMPROVEMENT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (TM.) MATERIALS BY OTHERS. VERIFY,.' OMITS OF PROPERTY AD- LOCATION DECORATIVE PAVEMENT BORDER SHALL OF MATERIALS IWTH•180 CITY PRIOR SURROUND AND ABUT STRUCTURE. TO CONSTRUCTION (TM.) COORDINATE CONCRETE WALL( SCORING,------- AND INSTALLATIDN._W11H- 781E-CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION (TYP.) 1 TOWN CENTER Cr WALK 0+10 PARKWAY 0+00 SECTION A -A' r i17.. < f, 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 NOTE: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SUBJECT 10 BE REVISED BASED UPON CITY COMMENTS. SEATING PLAZA — 80 ORNAMENTAL TREES 0+70 0+80 1- -FRONT ENTRY WALK -^MAN VEHICULAR 0RIVN 0 +110 0 +100 NOT 70 SCALE C2.1 CONCRETE SEAT WALL DETAIL 2 NOT TO SCALE PLAZA AREA - MATERIALS VARY SEE LAYOUT PLAN NOTE: I. FINISH GRADE AT PL4NTWG AREA a BELOW TOP OF SEATING WALL 1' -49 CHAMFER, FRONT FACE ONLY 1•X1/2• DEEP REVEAL 0000 PSI CONCRETE 94 TIES Ole HORIZONTAL AND 4-95 TIES VERTICALLY (1YP.) BRICK PAVERS FINISH GRADE 1 1/2' LAYER SAND SETTING BED DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE COMPACTED S180040E 2. SEE PLANS FOR TOP OF WALL ELEVATION. S HISCHT OF WALL VARES -SEE GRADING PLAN. LANDSCAPE MEDIA' - 098610NT, 13- 8TORY, AND MROER S11NRY P4081780 - YAMMERS OF PLANTS IS 8C1ATIM Bt' SF. OF MONA . TYPICAL PARKING LOT MEDIAN AUG G 1 5 2005 C a T a 1 +00 1 1 1+10 1 +20 SEATING PLAZA 1 +30 4— 1 +40 1 +60 SECTION B -B' NOTE: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SUBJECT 70 BE REVISED BASED UPON CITY COMMENTS. UBUC 1 +60 AT= comm.- Nom NPMMO MOUE NE ncAWareometameaunumas ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER 1 ,11, HARTFORD I )1 04 1X.18* Or. 'mercer, p. um P.WOd IN m. W uM1 RV Men ..prm.u, and nN I um , my Ins. UaOm, MAIM Loir 111 408 Mahe 0110.100 8811* J Sam OM._ Mmm N. 2004 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 121 81NGLEfREE UUE EDEN PANE IN ROWED PK 952 .1ID0 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 8 -15-05 - CRT REVIEW SET , REV. THUS SHEET SHEET TITLE: PLAZA ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C2.1 ® / / r NOT IN CONTRACT / , (N.I.C.) / // %I /// ORNE.THRU 1 /. i _. _ NOT IN CONTRACT SEDIMENT FENCE (11P.) NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) NOT IN CONTRACT / (N.I.C.) SEDIMENT FENCE (11'P.) �OF G G,fi�1 SEDIMENT FENCE (TYP.) UNIT OF CONSTRUCTION 908 NOT IN $1 lc.) FFE 905.50 BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,935 S.P. SITE: 029 ACRE ._ _'}... _ _ �- 010 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF A' AND V. OVERLAPE. END DF TOP STRIP LOWER STRIP AS IN .� -y 'E'OVERFALL 4" AND STAPLE erworvo FINISHED GRADE SHALL MATCH 0951150 GRADE 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT, ' TRENCH AND TAMPED..' DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. 5, TYPICAL STAPLE 15 GAUGE WIRE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTE 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEW MA70NC FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL / / CONCRETE 5TAIR SEE DETAIL , , • 4 RETAINING WALL , - - SEE DETA1L (TYP.) .,/i` TOWN CENTER PARKWAY SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4" WIRE HOOKED ONTO PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS 5700710D. DOSING GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. METAL POST AS SPECIFIED. FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CLIPS 120.C. ANCHOR FABRIC WITH 505. TAMP BACKFILL DIRECTION OF FLOW ova,. CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH T SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL NOT TD SCALE METAL POSTS 0 RETAINING WALL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 20' 191) 120 8" MINIMUM LOW PERMEABLE SOIL AS SPECIFIED CAP BLOCK WITH 3/4" OVERHANG FROM FACE OF WALL-2 BEADS OF ADHESIVE PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMENOATIONS MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL UNIT AS SPECIFIED (TIP.) GE0GR0 REINFORCEMENT AS SPECIFIED- VERIFY LENGTH WITH ENGINEER 12" WIDE DRAINAGE LAYER -3/4" DIA STONE -957. COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL IN 0 LIFTS 0 DIA. PERFORATED PIPE WITH FILTER SOCK (SLOPE TO 00117) MATERIALS 5ARY SEE PLANS 6" MINIMUM COMPACTED LEVEUNG PAD COMPACTED SUBCRADE NOTE 1. ALL SOIL PARAMETERS MUST BE VERIFIED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. •O— GRADING NOTES:-4)- 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO LOAMING AND 50001XG ACTIVITIES. 2. UNSUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED. SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF-SITE. 3. SUITABLE EXCESS PILL MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED IN A MANNER AND LOCATION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE UNIT DF WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOWUNE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS 6. LONGITUDINAL SLOPES OF WALKS SHALL BE 59 (MAX.) AND 1S (MIN.) AND 29 (MAX.) CROSS SLOPE EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS 7. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL REQUIRE SURFACE ROUGHENING BY OTHER STAIRSTEP" GRADING, GROOVING, FURROWING, OR TRACKING TO AVOID RUNOFF VELOCITY AND RECEIVE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. SLOPES LESS THAN 3:1 NOT STABILIZED WITH VEGETATION SHALL HAVE THE SURFACE ROUGH GRADED 10 REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY UNTIL SOD HAS BECOME STABILE AND MATURE AT NO 11145 THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT, SHALL SLOPES BE A SMOOTH GRADE OR A COMPACTED SURFACE la AUG 1 5 2005 12" FINISHED GRADE Trj7=ii 4 111 =111 -1I - /MUM DETAIL SECTION A -A' 'III -1_I A�. J . / VIDE EXPANSION JOINT / 1 SEALANT. 01 X 3/8• 'OA. STEEL DOWEL WITH SLEEVE f / ' MATERIALS VARY SEE PLANS FINISHEDD GRADE B" DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE 4— EROSION CONTROL NOTES:- -- - 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS AS SHORN ON THE DRAWINGS IN ADDITION TO OTHER MEASURES THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDINANCE 2 THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE 905709SBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL 5T9 THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. THIS MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE CLEANING AND /OR REPLACING AND ELMS THAT HAVE BECOME CLOGGED DR NO LONGER FUNCTIONAL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT MONTHLY AND AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TD INSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ER090N CONTROL SYSTEM. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND SATISFACTORY DISPOSAL OF ALL ER090N CONTROL STRUCTURES UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK AND SOIL STABILIZATION AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 30 L.F. OF SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO 1HE OUTLET OF EACH STORM DRAIN PIPE TO CONTROL AND MINIMIZE SILT RUNOFF. LEGEND: 419 470 . 422.0 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 5' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALL POSTE INTO 1 3/0 DIA CORE HOLE WITH NON- SHRINK GROUT, CROWN FOR DRAINAGE. SEAL AS SPECIFIED (TYP.) B "W CONCRETE SIDE WALL. HEIGHT SHALL BE FLUSH WITH NOSE OF STAIR SPACE POSTS EQUALLY. 4' -0• MAXIMUM 0.0. 1 1/2" DIA BRUSHED ALUMINUM POSTS AND RAIL 1/4" SEAM WELD JOINTS. FURNISH AND INSTALL RAILING TO MATCH SLOPE OF STAIR 16 B4 REBAR SPACED 36" 0.0 (TYP.) 1" CHAMFER ON (4) FOUR SIDES OF CURB WALL T14 REBAR SPACED 12" 0.0. 0 CLEARANCE FlN15HE0 GRADE Y: • ICiI ti STAIR DETAIL !HI C•� —1 I SIDE WALL SEE ABOVE DETAIL 1/2 DIA RADIUS ON NOSE (TYP.) BROOM FINISH TREADS PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC 13 REBAR AT NOSE OF TREAD (11P.) 1' BATTER TYP. SCA6 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT WITH SEALANT. 01.. X 3/8" DIA. STEEL DOWEL WITH SLEEVE MATERIALS VARY SEE PLANS FINISHED GRADE p4 REBAR SPACED 1Y D.C. 3" CLEARANCE #4 REBAR (1) PER NOSE OF TREAD COMPACT 5UBGRAOE 1" CHAMFER (4) FOUR EDGES Of CURB WALL 8"4 5 B"W CONCRETE WALL '''''-- HANDRAIL CENTERED WITHIN WALL (1) ONE PER 510E OF STAIR SEE ABOVE DETAIL STAIR RISER (TYP.) PLAN CONCRETE STAIR DETAIL NOT TO SCALE fc.armortamc N.en.awn.snv•oa ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER A Nil HARTFORD II kcd, mMl but Nb Ps..9Tm1m or weal we R.aanE try 1 ma a arbor ay dnk a9Miea a a Val 1 am a 51 lead . *08 AMi1.M awn HM Mw d 1M db M IMiwoh, DAM NM. 51<.. 1824854 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 11:1113 BN5ETUIF WEN MIME, IN RRTE:10 P1t 951- 79-1 100 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 6 -16-06 - 0TT REVIEW SET : REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C3.0 NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) 6" TEE-\ 6" GATE VALVE 6" PLUG 21 "- 6" PVC STAB ® 1.100 • INV .90033 to NIi1N7.NNII5Leett • • NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) / / / / / NOT IN CONTRACT (9.1.C.) HYDRANT W /GV /(�A GROUND EL■906.1 " . -.-1 TIN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) GATE VALVE 8" PLUG 29' -6" PVC STUB O 1.107 15■891.24 • I. / ._ _ • __.__._•1 / 5 -2'03' CATCH BASINS CONNECTED WITH 12" RCP RE.9D4.96 E-901.46 199' -18" RCP O 1.790 8" CR055 6 "X6" REDUCER 8 "- 11.25' BEND 8" CATE VALVE -2 . • .4.20 • _� LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB - (FIELD- voolr T LOCATION) J MANTAIN 1.5' MIN. CLEARANCE BETWEEN PIPES "NS�UC7 /r CONNECT TO 0951INGSTUB (FIELD VERIFY L05411 0) CONNECT TO k7D5TN0 51118 IE =690,79 (FjELD VERIF1) 1 I CONNECT ID- 130$TING STUB 1E1197.90 MELD VEPoF If 34' -6" PVC STUB - 1.10 IE.896.00 B" PLUG 11 NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) C _ _ 6" CAB H VA WASTE VEI "--6" PLUG ,-36.-6" PVC STUB O 1.100 / INV .900.50 MECHANICAL �MI(- • t, REf9Q4.D0 INv.IN I• (w&E 08D0.1D Jj INV OUT■88928- 9' -8" PVC CONNECT TO EXI51150 STUB 10.889.22 (FIELD EFY) TOWN- CENTER PARK1NAY BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,935 S.F. SITE, 0.29 ACRE ■ - • - - - - -- - --- - • _ J S z V is max'. \ i /2 % 2020• 6 0 20 PIP IIMMow oms MM. ww,w „y •� v�Iv A�Sa � . A� �y�.IiJyy��LE���y.�yy�� W1M11-013104: iya:!'�aY-i COYAmMon0l parkin construction PRECAST INVERT MUST BE 1/2 DIAMETER OF THE PIPE AND BENCHES SLOPED 2" TOWARD THE INVERT. ANNOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT OFFSET /ER0CAL PORTION OF CONE AND STEPS ARE FACING DOWNSTREAM. RNs AsPOm51Mw1 s EFI •HANNOLES SHALL SE PRECAST IN ACCORDANCE 16111 AM 0-475 maw. mompoms NETLAWN TURF WFFH ECS DRAINAGE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE � ac VARIES 12 " -16" VARIES SECTION MANHOLE STEPS. NEENAH RTae1J OR EQUAL. 10 ON CENTER AS APPROVER BY OSHA STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT OFFSET VERSCAL POSmON CF CONE AND TEPS ME FACING DOWNSTREAM A1.L JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAW b' RING RUBBER CASKETS. PRECAST INVERT REWIRED. E SHALL BE Cu, o RUST MTN 111005 SDE FACE OF HALL KOLA -N -SEAL MANHOLE BOOT OR 08404. •A.L HOLRSES SHALL SE GROUTED ON INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. MIMMUA 11.1ILINESS OF PRECAST BASE 5 B' FOR 14' DEEP OR LESS 4310 INCREASES 0 N 1MO1108S FOR EMERY 4. OF DEPTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 4- UTILITY NOTES: ---4)- 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXI51190 UTIUTES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF 517E GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 2. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (051- 454 -0002 OR 600- 252 -1155) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEVER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOOATON OF MINNESOTA, AND SHALL CONFORM MdTH CITY REQUIREMENTS 4. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 5. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) CLASS 52 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) 50R 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONRETE PIPE (RCP) UNLESS OTHERWISE N01E0. 8. PPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURES. 9. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FELT. ALL CATCH BASINS IN CUTTERS SHALL BE SIMPID 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS 10. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11. TYPICAL HYDRANT CONSISTS OF: HYDRANT, GATE VALVE, 2.5' OF 6" DIP WATERMAIN AND ANT HYDRANT EXTENSION. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL. 12. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REWIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER UNES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL 13. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND SIZES WITHIN THE BUILDING WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 15. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDUUNG OF NEW UTILITIES, IRRIGATION SYSTEM, AND UN009064INS MT1H ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CRY STAFF. 18. CONTRACTOR SMALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. STRUCTURE SCHEDULE: (i 5:120.0318E STZE 592.TJ900 48N -1 48" DIA R -1642 MH -2 48" DIA. R -1642 CB -1 2'03' RECT. R -41140 CB -2 27.3' RECT. R -4840 50 -3 2'03' RECT. R -4840 C8 -4 2'X3' RECT. R -4840 C8 -5 2'03' RECT. R -4840 • NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY OR APPROVED EQUAL VANE GRATE SHOWN DIRECTION OF FLOW 2005 NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED. CASTING AND ADJUSTMENT RINGS AS SPECIFIED. 24 x36" PRECAST DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE , .r N INSIDE AND OUTSIDE 4" -3" GROUT SECTION 2•X3' CATCH BASIN DETAIL GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW CUTTER GRADE 10' TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCHBASIN. A� �5• MAX NOT TO SCALE ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER A HARTFORD PEDIMMMI LIDO �wMI men wsoh m mop I hed/ wiry Sal Mk Rao NeeTal'm er need w Pewea by r . or MMe Ad, U00 a 1554 end that 1 ea a Huy UweM . /00 0 &Ow under tle Wu d the tato d tiiceeb. Ode NMI Y. Ae160IC iawaTss CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12.100 SNGUTREE APE IMAIME, MN SPETIDEC 0 PM 95b)WW0 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN RENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 5 -19 -05 - CITY REVIEW SET Cs REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: UTILITY PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.© • • DRIVET RU NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) 0.2 0.3 5 / 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.2 -. • ` / OE 03 0� 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1/ .1 r 0.1 01 %�4; 0.0 5 0.6 Ng IN C•,,; - - 0. 0R �� 0,0 01 % /1 I (N1. / / 0.2 /Q 0.4 0.5 0 1.1 1.3 1.1 0,7 0,4 0.3 / 7.. 0.4/ 0.5• 0 = 15 2.1 2.4 21 12 0.7 Ui 0.- 0.4 / / a'/ � _ .9'f7 3.1 3.9 3.0 21 0.5 0.4 0.2 or (/ se/ 0.3 / 0.6 ,5 2.6 l 3.7 • `310 1.9 0.3 ti i 0.3 / 0.5 L6 2.9 3,9 4.6 '3.6 1.7 0.9 0.7 0, - '02 % 4pT I / / •!& 2.2 - -`� 2,1 0.5 0.2 OS kkk"' \ 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 • 7 0.7 0,7 p.13 �9 / - -, LA 2.2 2.6 2.3 1.7 1. .5 2,3 31 2.1 3A 43 ` 35 21 tea' 22 lo. ,o��di . !LQ . _aA _ . 0.4 0.6 .3 1.9 2.0 2.9 3.6 3.3 2.7 1.7 0E •0.5' Jam/ 111 3.2 J '3.9 2.9 L9 2.6 3.1 2.9 2.4 1 1,5 1.e NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) 0 0,0 OA / 0.1 0.o 4 0.2 0.1 0.1 O.o jto 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,0 0.o 0,6 0.4 uM 0.5 1 h' 4-- LIGHTING NOTES: --# /1 DISCLAIMER These calculations are NOT yoga for owner ar city approval ueing any "non -ALD f represented product' or fixtures not shown on this plan. Fixtures must be provided by ALD. Colculotions hove been performed with our best interpretation of the details given to us Some differences between measured and calculated results may occur due to intolerances in calculation methods, testing procedures, component performance, measurement techniques and fie)d conditions such as voltage, temperature variations, lamp manufacturer variations, and other variables. Calculations do not take into consideration ,objects such as but not limited to, trees, buildings, pavement, sidewalk. J/r curs. Calculation yoga. represent horizontal (i.e. light meter faring etra)ght up) 1; Illuminance FC levels (unless othrwi.e noted). If the real envronment condition. do not match the Input data, differences will occur between measured values and calculated values. /m ALD is not responsible for acquiring or Interpreting any local lighting codes. r` These lighting calculations ore not a substitute for Independent engineering analysis by a professional engineer. 0,3 0.5 II NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) .2 .8 0.3 0,7` MPIIT Or aTTRUN 0.6 NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) 0.3 BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,935 S.F. SITE 0.29 ACRE 01 0.1 I i i I i . I , hi, 'O.o / TOWN CENTER PARKWAY .,f t. om L0Nneile Sehado. Pep= All Pepe. 05 Label Sy.0c7 Desolation A 3 C 4 19 G Lures 70 5HC450S2.PCCSRSJR.M well moult over recess Mar Arrange.. 5NGI.E Lumens L1F Riensme 5200 0.900 7.0000201.IE5 Gwdco 103FT.LL1OG4PS -HRP (Well n. Neer nwAae Jam,) SINGLE 9500 0.900 M3F1715H.1ea Omega OM950m17PMH -CS (Canopy ONO SINGLE 3450 0.700 20593.ES T1/13 07A (Gooseneck Spokane) Gerdm G19.2- 4%L -400M1 SINGLE HACK.5ACK 32000 0.900 0.700 V- 1e0AN051001SIC.b GW4x4MJ.0 HnxueNM G7070N4R999.F (Irgrou.d We lights) Gndm 942'207 14.V-HLP (000770) SINGLE 5500 0.000 g7100m1w.les SINGLE 3400 0.700 M0425L53.1e3 Lumee DM550- 100MMEG3 (Nailer to decorative.. tight) 0500 0.700 G3■17M.IES Simons Summuy MINN A7 Proiese Label 1 CalcTyae Una Avg Max Mm perkkg area Soo nom 137 5.0 OD pee. erne I rumens Fc 250 155 0.0 TYPE A -Wall mount __. -_sees TYPE B -Wall mount TYPE C- Canopy light TYPE E- Parking Lot TYPE D-Sign light TYPE F -Tree uptight TYPE GStep light 1 TYPE K- Walkway fixture Mount 0060 P most 05 Pejsa. SKIN Law 4 B 12 H 12 9 12 C 22 C 22 H C 22 10 c 22 11 C 22 12 C 22 13 0 25 14 0 25 15 D 25 15 0 25 21 0 22 a 25 a 25 d 27 2. a 20 30 31 32 33 0 94 C 2 G 2 35 G 2 41 77 14 17 E 99 17 E 33 19 39 20 E 35 A 12 2 A 12 12 AUG 1 z 2005 �; c FY OF .a LP' -:r mneorrme. beam= Nam WE, ae 4 $s ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD CONSULTANT: MOKIILIVRIL 1.10,111.312./.1.. OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC MOD SINCFT.$ LAM MEN NOON PFn:1a3 7tR 952-7 48-1.200 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN 0*Ni6t PARKWAY ISSUE: e -15-45 - OTT REVIEW SET REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.1 NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) f ""'"Fr" TRIO \�rOW NOT IN CONTRACT (N.LC.) 4— LANDSCAPING NOTES: —1)- 1. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4' LAYER LOAM AND WASHED 50D AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. AREAS WITHIN STREET RIGHT —OF —WAY SHALL RECEIVE LOAM AND 50D WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. SEE 50D INSTALLATION NOTES BELOW. 2. LOCATIONS OF DECIDUOUS AND 009100ROU5 TREES ARE APPROXWIATE AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTIU11E5, UGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS, AND STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVEW AND APPROVAL B Y THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE BALLED AND BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP. 4, PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER OF 1 -1/2' CRAY ANGULAR TRAP 5TONE MULCH ON TOP OF A NON — BIODEGRADABLE FILTER FABRIC AND BORDERED WITH 3/16" THICK STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGING. 5. RAINOARDEN AND INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL RECEIVE ECS SYSTEMS AND NETLAWN ADVANCED TURF AS SPECIFIED. B . ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO MSTALLA110N. PAVEMENT VARIES SEE DRAWINGS 117323,711-11D 1 (_PAVCUFNr v40 Fe_ SEE DRAWINGS � OAF •�- LIMIT OF CONSIRUCTON .• NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) BETTY'S PIES BIDE: 7,935 S.F. SITE: 0.29 ACRE /� �' �l pi) PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2 "X4"XS' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN wail TWO STRANDS 01 WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120' TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1 " -2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE I, 1 -1/2" TRAP STONE MULCH TO 7- OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH 2" FROM TRUNK (_ THREE TIMES WIDTH �( OF ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL IF NON — BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDE OF HOLE BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBN0 II� 1111.1I .iL,u '1=F' X`N TII I I I 1 1[ M -�11 1.... I —irI T-- blo� -1 THREE TIMES 1MDTH OF ROO18ALL EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TD SCALE j J - TREES AND / 0V. GRATES B7— ✓1 'GRATES _--01NER5 (TYP.) r4Fr.' PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2"24'X8' WOODEN STAKES. STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120" TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK 9U3BER HOSE COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1 " -2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE 1 -1/2" 1RAP STONE MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER KEEP MULCH 2" FROM TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IF NON — BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOIBALL _ THREE TIMES WIDTH OF R00TBALL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE) PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1 -2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 1" =25' ,4 /;b 0 240 • 4— SODDING INSTALLATION: --�E 1. THE LOAM AND 501L SHALL BE 4' LAYER MINIMUM, LOOSENED, AND FREE OF CLODS, ROCKS, AND DEBRIS. 2. AREAS TO RECEIVE 50D SHALL BE FERTILIZED WITH 25 POUNDS PER 1000 SOFT. (1000 LB /90) OF 10 -10-10 FERTIUZER AND WORKED INTO THE TOPSOIL 3. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DAMPENED PRIOR TO LAYING THE SW. JOINTS IN THE 50D SHALL BE STAGGERED, AND THE EDGES BUTTED TOGETHER TIGHTLY TO AVOID GAPS BETWEEN 50D LENGTHS. 4. SOD INSTALLED ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER, OR IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOWS, SHALL BE STAKED IN PLACE INSTALL THE SOD WITH THE LENGTH PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATER FLOW FOR SLOPES 8144 SHEET FLOW. 5. AFTER INSTALLATION, AREAS SHALL BE TAMPED OR ROILED TO PROVIDE GOOD CONTACT BETWEEN SOD AND SOIL AFTER ROWNG, THE SOD SHOULD BE WATERED SO THAT THE SOIL IS MOISTENED 4 INCHES BELOW 1HE S00. 4-- SODDING MAINTENANCE: -- )- 1. IN THE ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE RAINFALL, WATER DURING THE 30 DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING SOD PLACEMENT TO KEEP SOIL MOIST. FOLLOWING THIS INITIAL 30 DAY ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, WATER AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE MOISTURE IN THE ROOT ZONE 2. WHERE MOWING IS DESIRED, MAINTAIN GRASS HEIGHT OF 3 INCHES AND SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED UNTIL THE SOD 15 FIRMLY ROOTED, USUALLY TWO TO THREE WEEKS AFTER 50D IS LAID. 3. INSPECT AREAS DE CONCENTRATED FLAW ANNUALLY AND FOLLOWING INTENSE STORMS. MAKE NEEDED REPAIR AND REVEGETATE PROMPTLY. 4-- SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS: ---i 5. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE /MOOT OCR AND INSTALLED NO LATER THAN JUNE 15TH. IF PUNTING OCCURS AFTER AUGUST 15154, SEED 8144 A NURSE CROP OF RYE NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 5144. IF PLANTING HAS NOT OCCURRED BY OCTOBER 5144, THEN DORMANT SEED THE SITE NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1ST. 0110•71 ` TREE GRATE PLANTING DETAIL 901 10 SCALE -01,0-- PLANTING SCHEDULE QTY. COMMON NAME 50001005 TREES SUNBURST HONEY LOCUST CRIMSON KING MAPLE 1 1/2" TRAP STONE MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. 1100? MULCH 2" FROM TRUNK EXISTING GRADE RDO10 AT OUTER EDGE OF R00TBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL—TO —ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL BOTANICAL N9M0 ROOT (1) 9' DIA UGHT OPENING WTH 10 -3/8" DIA GRATE BOLTED TO TREE GRATE TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL (2) TWO PIECE TREE CRATE AS SPECIFIED TREE AERATION SYSTEM —BLACK 4 "R 4" PVC CAP AND REDUCER ON SOUD PVC RISER WITH TEE AND 90 DEGREE BEND AT CORNERS GRATE SHALL CONTAIN OPENING FOR FLEXIBLE IRRIGATION FILL PIPE EXTERIOR 010014CAL OUTLET BOX AND DOVER AS APPROVED BY 114E OTT. COORDINATE LOCATION WITH GRATE MANUFACTURER (TYPO PAVEMENT BORDER AROUND ALL SITE FU991091NG5 AS SHOWN 011 THE PLANS (TYP.) 16" DIA. MINIMUM GRATE OPENING MULCH (2' MAX.) TO BOTTOM OF TREE GRATE USE PEA STONE TREE GRATE AS SPECIFIED NON BIODEGRADEABLE GEOTEXOLE FABRIC SEE FLEXIBLE IRRIGATION DETAIL WALK— MATERIALS VARY SEE DRAWINGS PLANT BACKFILL MIX AS SPEC. COMPACTED IN 6" LIFTS TO MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 9211 IF ROOT BALL 15 WRAPPED IN PLASTIC DR NON — BIODEGRADABLE MATERML TREE AERATION SYSTEM w/ 4" PVC PIPE, REDUCER AND BLACK PVC GAP 4" PERT. PVC PIPE WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC TREE PR THE FULL SIZE OF GRATE SZE COMMENTS SWAMP WHITE 0AK — PRAIRIE SPIRE ASH — AMVR FLAME CLUMP MAPLE Cledltslo trlochonthos vor. Inermle 'Suncole Acer olotonoidee 'CHmson Kino' Ouercus bicolor Fraxinus oennnlVonico 'Ruabv Acer Olnnola 'Flame B&B B&B B&B 899 B98 2 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM 2 1/' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL 809• 21(2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM 2 1 2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM 2 1/2 CAL MULTI— STEM —CLUMP FORM CONIFERIOU5 TREES BALSAM FIR Ables concolor 598 6' HT. STRAIGHT LEADER —FULL FORM ORNAMENTAL TREES SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE M0102 'SOrina Snow' B&B 1 1/2" CAL SPECIMEN TREE —FULL FORM oe 6Y PAPER BIRCH Betulo poperifera 8113 1 1/2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER — MOLT —STEM — THORNLESS HAWTHORN Sorbus deeara — RIVER BIRCH Betulo paperifer0 B&B 1 1/2" CAL SPECIMEN —TREE FORM B&8 1 1/2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER —MULTI—STEM DECIDUOUS SHRUBS COMPACT PAM RHODODENDRON Rhododendron 'P.J.M. Compact' IVORY HALO DOGWOOD Carnes albs 'Baahalo' CONT. 36" KT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 4' DC. CONT. 36" HT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 4' O.C. G- 0— U1TLE PRINCESS 0819004 — COMPACT BURNING BUSH Splroca loponica 'Little Princess' CONT. 39" HT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 3' 0.C. Euanvmue 010tue 'COmooctua — GREEN VELVET BOXWOOD Dacus >t 'Green Velvet — ROYAL BURGUNDY BARBERRY BerIerle th1995141 'Gentry Cultlwr' CONT. 36" HT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 4' 0,C. CONT, 24" HT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 3' 0.C. CONT. 24" NT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 3' 0.0. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 0—{ — DWARF BLUE GLOBE SPRUCE plcea ouncena 'Globoeo CONT. 36 HT. DENSE BRANCH —SPACE 4' 0,C. 1 NEILAWN ADVANCED TURF AS SPECIFIED ® COMM. 3.1,,MMmu1m®MP WE M[.NCa16lM 6TARMS ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER n" HARTFORD 11.0 s,..sr Re I h.1' .01) UH 9n 4T. gedredim or 4reinRn;wn eo trol 1 .111 ny Inud LAw.me No190 4,80 Ye bo d the Mote N 10S41. WO PoRW. ex. NA Mt CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LLL LLC 12.100 51...E1REE EIn RN scream Pk 9520164440 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN (ENTER PARKWAY r„ AUG 1 5 2005 " L1 vs E ISSUE: 8 -15-05 - CITY REVIEW NT 4 REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TTI'I.E: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C5.O BAG-N-B0 SIN( CNENICAL SNELVING j1�({M N'asGERI L WALK -IN FREEZER it ce' ' � i � 1I WALK -IN / 1 COOLER I DAIRY COOLER x71 H MECNAN IC Room IF MEW ICE isMR L 1: a J J CONE J i" 1''111 Illlu PIKSf FLOM PLAN l�H .1 «« L .1 1 MIR WV., -1..0 Private Pining poom $i i I it ! Ij 111 ii ! I 111 f l �ii i ii eer AUG 1 T; 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER �Iil HARTFORD cue cam ollimoon ram CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC EDEN EM SwTe:ItG M 952- 996-1209 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE -I5-05 - CITY REnEw SET P REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A1.O cowmar2owANAK,A.R ROW' NE, WG n4E-must ewer) CEILING FM/ .1-0 1 FIR% ROOK WLZCIED CELIZ RAN IININimumm111111111111111•iiiifirk NIMMIMIIIIIIMINIMIIIMIIIIIIIMMIlk 11•■•••••=11•1111111111111111M•11•1111111111111111k g1•111\ aT ... ... 1 :::: :::: .... .... .... .... Ira IIIII 111111111M1 SWUM .11/ -0" Auct 5 Z005 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD Snte ecAnwimA motsw 0,1K07.121. Ivrc (95217.12B CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS-LL, LLC MOO S.C.AE717EE LANE EC. FRAM, NA SUM= 95.16-1200 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TDWN CENRER PARKWAY ISSUE: 5-16-03 - 077 REVIEW SET REV. THIS SHEET SHEET 1TRE: UPPER FLOOR PLAN AND CEILING PLAN SHEET!' NUMBER: A2.0 1.1 COMMIT INVIVIID GM! onomecromotemsnweams EMEEZiaIgitEUISSEIBENESECIBMSWISSEVAISSEINVEIMEMEN BE • 1321.11217 217IIS ISARTFORD 6201■10 Lla rianwrnr.rusumamoras FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER n,,, HARTFORD M=PUi 1211. Iiin*Sub two raft, n■ Mao. Ott (.15217•61.110 e561171.1i6 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS-LL LLC IVY] uta EDEN MUIR., 01.1 SUrrE:103 P15 9414612I6 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 1-15-05 — CRT REVIEW SET REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIME: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHEET NUMBER: A3.0 51'-0}/4" (TYP) — 66' 134' 13' 3)'2" 24' -9Y4" 11' -11)Z" 9}p' 12' 24.-9" 84" 1' -0}'2" 7'- 113/4" FOUNDATION NOTES: 1) FOUNDATION HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS SPREAD FOOTINGS IN REFERENCE TO SOILS REPORT NO. XXXXXXXXXXXX DATED XXXXXXXXX, 200X BY BRAUN INTERTEC. ANY UNSUITABLE SOIL 7' 10Y2" BELOW FOOTING BEARING LOCATIONS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH STRUCTURAL FILL COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR (REMOVE ANY SOIL WITH ORGANIC MATERIALS SUCH AS TOP SOIL). EXCAVATION TO BE OVERSIZED 1 FOOT FOR EACH FOOT OF FILL SEE SOILS REPORT FOR RECOMMENDED DEPTH OF EXCAVATION AND FILL MATERIALS. 38' -6" 36' -13/4" 5' -5" — 19' -11" 48' 40' 12' -9Y4" FOOTING & FOUNDATION PLAN NOTE: SEE S3 FOR GENERAL NOTES AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES SLAB & ELEVATION NOTES: MIN. FLOOR SLAB THICKNESS 4" OVER 6" COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL Sc 6MIL POLY REINFORCE W/ 6X6 10 /10 W.W. MESH SEE ARCH DWGS FOR SLAB SLOPES AND FLOOR DRAINS ELEVATIONS: TOP OF SLAB ® FND WALL 89'10" (VARIES ELSEWHERE SEE ARCH DWGS) TOP OF FOOTING: 89'2" UNO TOP OF FOOTING ® PRECAST COLS: 88'2" (QTY 11) 25' -0)'4" --' 7-10Y2" 2) DESIGN BEARING PRESSURE = 3000PSF, TO BE VERIFIED BY SOILS ENGINEER. MINIMUM FROST COVER 3' -6 ", 5' -0" AT ISOLATED EXTERIOR FOOTINGS. 3) SLAB —ON —GRADE BASE FILL TO BE GRANULAR MATERIAL PLACED IN MIN. 4" LAYER AND COMPACTED TO 957 STANDARD PROCTOR. EXISTING SUB —GRADE TO BE DISCKED AND COMPACTED WITH A SHEEPSFOOT ROLLER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY FILL. STRUCTURAL FILL TO BE PLACED IN MAX 9" LIFTS AND COMPACTED WITH A SELF — PROPELLED SHEEPSFOOT ROLLER TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. 29' -6" 4) SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY SUBGRADE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION BEFORE POURING FOOTINGS. 5) USE FROST RESISTANT GRANULAR BACKFILL AROUND PIERS AND WALLS. 6) PROTECT EXCAVATIONS & POURED FOOTINGS FROM FROST PENETRATION AT ALL TIMES. NO CONCRETE TO BE PLACED ON FROZEN SOIL. 1' -43'4" 21' 2•-1" U t 10' -8)'2" 2' 1" fi 8 CONCRETE NOTES: 1) EXCEPT AS NOTED, ALL CONCRETE WORK TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT ACI 301 SPECIFICATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL WORK FOR BUILDINGS AND IBC 2000 AND APPLICABLE RELATED STANDARDS. CONCRETE MIXES SHALL BE DESIGNED PER ACI 301, USING PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C -150 OR C -595, AGGREGATE CONFORMING TO ASTM C -33 AND ADMIXTURES CONFORMING TO ASTM C -494, 0 -1017, C -618, C -989 AND C -260. 2) CONCRETE STRENGTH TO BE 3000PSI AT 28 DAYS WITH MAX. WATER CEMENT RATIO (W /C) = .50 FOR ALL CAST —IN —PLACE CONCRETE EXCEPT GARAGE FLOOR SLAB TD BE 4000 P51 AT 28 DAYS WITH MAX. W/C RATIO = .46 3) MAX. AGGREGATE SIZE: 3/4" FOR FTGS. & SLAB 3/8" FOR MASONRY FILL 4) MAX SLUMP: 4" EXCEPT 8" FOR MASONRY FILL Sc 3" FOR SLABS 5) AIR ENTRAINMENT: 4.5 -7.5% FOR GARAGE FLOOR AND EXPOSED WORK 6) SAWCUTS FOR GARAGE SLAB —ON —GRADE SHALL BE 1" DEEP & 1/8" WIDE. CUTTING TO BE DONE NOT SOONER THEN 12 HOURS, AND NOT LATER THEN 24 HOURS AFTER SLAB POUR. CUTS TO BE FILLED WITH APPROVED BITUMINOUS COMPOUND OR CAULKING. MAKE CUTS AS SQUARE AS POSSIBLE AT A MAX. OF 16FEET SQUARE. 7) CONCRETE MATERIALS, FORMING, PLACING, FORM REMOVAL ETC.. TO ACI RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACCEPTABLE STANDARD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE. 8) REINFORCED CONCRETE HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT ACI -318 AND IBC 2000 WITH APPLICABLE RELATED STANDARDS. MASONRY NOTES: 1) ALL MASONRY HAS BEEN DESIGNED AND IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH IBC 2000 AND THE APPLICABLE REFERENCED STANDARDS. 2) ALL CONCRETE BLOCKS TO CONFORM TO ASTM C90 GRADE N. MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH = 2000 PSI. 3) ALL MORTAR TO BE TYPE "M" WITH MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH = 2500 P51 (UNO SEE SPECS.). 4) MINIMAL MASONRY LINTEL TO BE 8" HIGH U BLOCK C/W 2 — #5 BOTTOM AND CONCRETE FILL FOR OPENINGS UP TO 4' -0" U /N. FOR LARGER OPENINGS NOT SHOWN, CONSULT THE ENGINEER. LINTELS SHALL BE SHORED UNTIL FILL HAS ACHIEVED 2/3 OF ITS DESIGN STRENGTH. FILL TWO BLOCK CORES FOR TWO COURSES EACH END OF LINTELS. 5) PROVIDE VERTICAL REINFORCED CONCRETE CORES AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS AND HORIZONTAL DUR —O —WALL REINFORCING AT 16" 0/0 TO ALL BLOCKWORK. ALL REINFORCED CORES TO BE CONCRETE FILLED W/ 1 — #5 POSITIONED 3 1/2" FROM INSIDE FACE & SHALL BE HELD IN POSITION (PRIOR TO GROUTING) WITH WIRE POSITIONERS SPACED AT 192 BAR DIAMETERS ( 10' MAX.) AND AT REINFORCING SPLICES. 6) PROVIDE VERTICAL CONTROL JOINTS ® MAX. 30' -0" O /C. SEE STRUC. DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS. FILL CORE W/ 1 — #5 EACH SIDE OF CONTROL JOINT. 7) PROVIDE BOND BEAM (8" MIN DEPTH) AT TOP COURSE OF ALL MASONRY WALLS & UNDER ALL PRECAST, STEEL DECK AND BAR JST. BEARING W/ 2 — #5. 1 /E• . 1'- 0• A s o 4 e FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �. mPns+n ate,Il ATFO D1a1nn NE a "C 444t4FC15'u16IrI.SIPI wl45 ARCHITECTJENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD olaine, ow A. I msh 4ot t: qm.4-444 " report ."ono ym"under rof 40x16044 a4 to I amo 4 Rg 4 Studds Fnun., Lode to to e1 to Pt* of Remote Goy G. WOW PE P<peta45, N0015551 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12119.73MEE LANE 8 44= mER P2NRE.,x nmE:1m nl: afb'N61 0G PROJECT: BtIIY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE • c.T"T`. . c , REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET NUMBER: S1.0 2005 • iINC:9u•7,�ianr.I;. • RO • : SLOPE DOWN zz APIAIIPIPFJS ROOF BAR JST 30K12 © 5'OC :Z4 F 5 18110 2 NOTE: 1)STEEL MEZZ DECK TO BE 1.0C 26ga W/ 3 1/2" CONCRETE W/ 5/8" PUDDLE WELD TO BAR JOISTS AND BEAMS ® 11" 0 /0. 2)ATTACH DECK TO INTERIOR WALLS W/ 3 "X3 "X1/4" ANGLE W/ 1/2 "o BOLTS ® 16" OC. WELD SIM TO NOTE 1). 3)TOP OF BEAM ELEVATION (2ND FLOOR) XXX'X" UNO 4) STEEL ROOF DECK TO BE 1.5B 22ga W/ 9e" PUDDLE WELD TO STL. BAR JST.S & BEAMS © 6 "0 /C & #10 TEK SCREWS ® DECK SIDE LAP SEAMS (QTY 2 PER SIDELAP) LIGHT FRAMED COLD— FORMED STEEL EXTERIOR WALL & INTERIOR BEARING WALL NOTES: 1) ALL LIGHT FRAMED COLD— FORMED STEEL EXTERIOR WALLS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED AND ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH IBC 2000 AND THE APPLICABLE REFERENCED STANDARDS. 2)TYPICAL UNO LIGHT FRAMED COLD— FORMED STEEL WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH 5 /8" (MIN) GYPSUM BOARD ON EACH SIDE OF 6" STEEL STUDS WITH STRAP BLOCKING (SOLID BLOCKING BETWEEN THE FIRST TWO END STUDS). GYP BOARD TO BE SCREWED 4" 0 /C. SCREWS FASTENING THE GYP BOARD SHALL BE #6 (MIN) AND ALL SCREWS SHALL PENETRATE THROUGH THE STEEL STUDS WITH AT LEAST THREE EXPOSED THREADS (IN ACCORDANCE WITH IBC 2000 SECTION 2211). 3)LIGHT FRAMED COLD — FORMED STEEL WALLS WITH EXTRA SHEAR CAPACITY (NOTED ON PLAN) TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH 7/16" OSB ON ONE SIDE OF 6" STEEL STUDS AND FULLY BLOCKED 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD ON THE OTHERSIDE. OSB AND GYP BOARD TO BE SCREWED AT 4" 0 /C. 05B SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM HEAD DIAMETER OF .292 ", SCREWS FASTENING THE GYP BOARD SHALL BE #6 (MIN) AND ALL SCREWS SHALL PENETRATE THROUGH THE STEEL STUDS WITH AT LEAST THREE EXPOSED THREADS (IN ACCORDANCE WITH IBC 2000 SECTION 2211). 4) OSB AND GYPBOARD TO BLOCKED AND TERMINATE AT ANGLES ON THE CEIL TRACK OF WALL. 5)LIGHT FRAMED COLD— FORMED STEEL WALLS TO BE ANCHORED TO FOUNDATION WALL WITH CARBON STEEL EXPANSION ANCHORS 1/2" 0 (MIN) 8 32" 0/0 (48" ON WALLS W/0 OSB) WITH 4" EMBEDMENT (MIN) (A 1/2 "0 POWERS FASTENERS SPIKE MAY BE USED WITH 2 5/8" EMBEDMENT). ALSO, PLACE A —BOLT EACH SIDE OF DOOR OPENINGS. MAKE SURE THE OSB AND OR GYP BOARD IS FASTENED TO THE BASE PLATE (TRACK) AT 4" 0 /C; THIS BASE PLATE TRACK TO BE 12GA (MIN), 50KSI STEEL WITH 2 1/2" FLANGE (MIN). 6) WHERE POSSIBLE, THE STEEL STUDS IN THE LIGHT FRAMED COLD— FORMED STEEL WALLS ARE TO BE CONTINUOUS FROM 1ST FLOOR TO THE ROOF (HIGHEST ROOF WHERE THERE ARE TWO ROOFS). 1 /a• - 1'- o• 1 1 0 4 0 AUG 1 2005 OF FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCH1TECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD Ife. (9917461= 1 nnq r:ur S • - lowiregen but wpav'sbn SO I on 0 04 ions N Ce 5E1E120 EEO., *05 A M mote. 14e fay C. P *6401 PE R•e99Gm WSW CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 1E1m SDEL ma u,r� E#R "11,0:5-, PP: 9A-746-1X0 PROJECT: BE I l Y'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 5 -15-05 - Qrt REVIEW SET L� REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE: STRUCTURAL MEZZANINE AND LOWER ROOF PLAN SHEET NUMBER: S2.0 20,.19i.21X6. HARTFORD Nt. ,9.,5I55,_ ," .» COLUMN (TYP) HIP TRUSS GIRDER HIP TRUSS ,t 0 HI ROOF PLAN 4 2 0 4 e REINFORCING STEEL NOTES: 1) ALL MAIN STEEL TO BE ASTM A615 - GRADE 60 DEFORMED BILLET STEEL BARS (STIRRUPS , AND SUPPORT BARS CAN BE ASTM A615 -GRADE 40). ALL WELDING OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS D1.4. 2) SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE DETAILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI DETAILING MANUAL AND CURRENT ACI -315 "MANUAL FOR STANDARD PRACTICE FOR DETAILING REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES" AND SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION. LAP STEEL 36 BAR DIAMETERS UNO. ON ALL REINFORCING STEEL INDICATED AS BEING CONTINUOUS (CONT). 3) COVER TO REINFORCING UNO: 3" UNDERSIDE FOOTING, CONCRETE CAST AGAINST & PERMANENTLY EXPOSED TO EARTH 2" © TOP OF EXPOSED SLABS, BARS EXPOSED TO EARTH OF WEATHER 1 }i" ' COLUMNS & BEAMS %." WALLS, ELEVATED SLABS (& JOISTS) THAT ARE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER 4) ALL REBAR TO BE HELD IN PLACE WITH PROPER ACCESSORIES SUPPLIED BY THE REINFORCING STEEL SUPPLIER. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE SET AND TIED IN PLACE PRIOR TO POURING OF CONCRETE, EXCEPT THAT VERTICAL DOWELS FOR MASONRY WALL REINFORCING MAY BE 'FLOATED' IN PLACE. 5) ALL REBAR FOR EXTERIOR STOOPS & ENTRY SLABS TO BE EPDXY COATED. 6) ALL WELDED WIRE FABRIC (WWF) SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM -185 AND BE 6 "X6 ", W1.4XW1.4 UNO. GENERAL NOTES: 1) DESIGN LOADS: (IBC 2000) ( MNBC 2003) ROOF: SNOW = 50PSF GROUND SNOW LOAD PLUS BUILT -UP LOADS AS PER MNBC 03 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD = 20PSF FLOORS:IST FL LIVE LOAD= 100PSF MEZZ FL LIVE LOAD= 100PSF MOVEABLE PARTITION LOAD =20PSF FOUNDATION WALLS: EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE =50PSF WITH THE USE OF FREE DRAINING SANDS USED AS BACKFILL. WIND LOADS: 90 MPH WIND EXPOSURE B 2) STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THIS BUILDING IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2003 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE & 2000 IBC. 3) VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DRAWING DISCREPANCIES IMMEDIATELY. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 4) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE BRACING UNTIL BUILDING IS CLOSED IN. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN, SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF ALL BRACING, SHORING AND FORMWORK REQUIRED. `� � fit 1 05 =z AUG _. 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION r pn caw nos,T ooaow NEr e../W.e«. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD I. Min 1— orgy that u: olm. n."Yeerm or wart we prepared rne Ike wry end mmenikin tot 1 on 6* Ii4fbee SN"Wrtl EnoMer w,r ge bn et 2r Npe W Mims*. Fay 0. MeaI PE Re0ee6ee 1421081 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC urros,+¢ETPEE U� MEN MARIE, WI Mt 9si ->4.>uZ PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: S 1 05 — CITT REVIEW SET G REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TTTL.E: STRUCTURAL UPPER ROOF PLAN SHEET NUMBER: S3.O • • • 5-rRt-r 1'-0" RECEIVED AUG 2 E, 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • • • • ftvA-rio\ 5CP1 1/4" RECEIVED ALES S 2005 Ij CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • AGENDA ITEM V.E.3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: September 14, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plan — Lakewood Apartments Legacy at Woods Edge BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for an apartment building with first floor multi- tenant retail within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the apartment building as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). One of the goals of the mixed use downtown is to provide a variety of housing types and costs to meet life cycle housing needs that are not currently available in Lino Lakes. The development agreement between the Lino Makes Economic Development Authority (EDA) and Hartford Group, the developer of the workforce housing, .ncludes housing covenants. Those housing covenants include an affordability clause that requires that 20 percent of the housing units built on the development property as a whole must meet affordability requirements. Of that 20 percent, 67 percent must be rental units that meet the income and rent requirements for federal low - income tax credits. This 60 -unit workforce rental housing meets the 67 percent requirement. In addition, affordable rental housing must meet the following requirements: 1. The developer must retain an experienced, professional property manager, approved in writing by the EDA. 2. The management agreement must require that the manager will use resident selection criteria that include evidence that tenants have income to support their rental rate, rental history showing timely payment of rent, and criminal background checks. 3. The management agreement must include a plan for long -term maintenance and repair of the property. ANALYSIS Planned Unit Development Lakewood Apartments is located in a Mixed Use Land Use area and is located on Lot 10 and 11 in Block B. Acceptable Building Types are Commercial /Retail /Office/Housing. The proposed apartment building will include underground parking, first floor retail and apartments, and three additional floors of apartments for a •tal of 60 units within the four story structure. Lakewood Apartment, page 2 4he layout generally follows the original layout, though the lots have been slightly modified to accommodate e proposed apartment building. The layout of the entire block is shown on the site plan. The site has been reorganized to allow a commercial /office building to the west of the apartment building and one to the north along the Interstate 35W frontage. It is a reduction in the overall building area that will be built in the area and is therefore substantially conforming to the original layout. The use of ground floor as residential (apartments) is not fully in conformance with the guidelines; however, since the portion of the building where this is being done is along a residential street across from future townhomes, staff finds it acceptable to permit a small number of units on the mixed -use streetside. The front setbacks along the build to lines exceed the 5 foot maximum; however, this will be permitted because a pedestrian walkway connecting the building entries to the street is provided. The site layout does not necessarily take into account the streetscape which is being designed and built by the city. Specifically, street trees and grate alignment must be taken into account when planning the location of the pedestrian walkway and any stairways or ramps that might be needed to provide access from the streetscape. Building Materials/ Elevations The submittal includes elevation drawings; however there are no references to height, building materials, or proposed colors. As such it is impossible for staff to determine if it is in conformance with the guidelines. Staff does have concerns in regards to the faux mansard roof that is depicted on sheet A5.1 (the front elevation), and ould like to see it removed. Sheet A5.2 may be the rear elevation of the building, but again it lacks ppropriate details to determine it's conformance with the guidelines. Staff is recommending continuation of this project based on the lack of sufficient information for review. Landscaping Staff is recommending that the landscaping plans be revised and resubmitted so that the following items can be accounted for. The sheet numbering appears to be inconsistent. The parking numbers called out do not accurately account for the number of spaces in the parking lot. Additional overstory trees should be indicated in the planting beds along the front side of the apartment units to shade pedestrians and soften the building facade. The streetscape trees should be shown on the plan to indicate their relationship with onsite landscaping. Crimson King and Colorado Blue Spruce should be eliminated in favor of Red Oak, Hackberry, or Red Pine. Autumn Red Spire Red Maple and Eastern Red Cedar should be replaced with more appropriate materials. Bush Honeysuckle should be used in place of Green Velvet shrubs. Berberis thinbergii is not a hardy plant in this zone and can be a trash collector. It should be replaced with Neon Flash to accomplish the same color palate. Overall the plant palette and layout should be revised to make the landscape less institutional and more inviting for pedestrians and residents. The landscaping plan is deficient in the parking lot medians. Additional trees must be planted with low growing deciduous or coniferous shrub accents. Some of the landscaping materials listed are prohibited by the zoning ordinance or are inappropriate for this area and must be replaced with appropriate materials. As always, all sodded and planted areas will require irrigation when appropriate. • Lakewood Apartment, page 3 Sarking This site is a part of what was identified as Block 2 of the Land Use Plan for Legacy at Wood's Edge. As was mentioned earlier, the layout of this block is proposed to be changed slightly. Within this block 280 parking spaces are being provided (including on- street and underground parking). This proposed building will require more spaces than what was originally accounted for in the shared parking analysis; however the shared parking analysis shows that at this point only 200 parking spaces will be required by all of the proposed uses on this block once the restaurant is added and the combination of the lots is accounted for. This will obviously change as each lot is developed and staff will verify that each use has the appropriate amount of parking available. The parking requirements for this building alone are 173 parking spaces. With the underground and on- street parking for this site there will be in excess of 196 spaces provided with this phase of the development. Lighting The photometric lighting plan meets the guidelines of the Town Center Design and Development guide, but it does not account for the wall mounted luminaries. The mounting height of the lighting is also not indicated. All pole mounted lights within the parking lot are limited to a maximum height of 20 feet, and all other pole mounted lights used for walkway or other lighting are limited to a maximum height of 14 feet. It is also recommended that the Domus luminaire located near the north entrance drive be moved further east to avoid the garage entrance. A revised lighting plan indicating conformance with these recommendations must be ibmitted. Engineering The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is S.E.H., and a memorandum including all of their comments is attached to the report. The issues addressed in that memorandum are another reason staff is recommending to continue this item to the next regular meeting. There are numerous issues that though they may not affect the final layout of the site, still need to be addressed prior to city staff feeling comfortable making a recommendation on the item for the Planning and Zoning Board. Final Plat The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) is attached as to the same agenda as a separate item, and a condition will be added to this review that the final plat must be approved prior to any building permits for this building. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31st regular meeting. Their comments are attached and many were addressed in the landscaping portion of the staff report. Additionally, the board was concerned with the recycling program for the apartment complex. Staff will include a condition requiring that a full recycling plan be submitted and approved when this item is brought back to the Planning and Zoning ooard. Lakewood Apartment, page 4 •ECOMMENDATION 1. Staff recommends that this project be continued to the October 12, 2005 regular meeting. ATTACHMENTS 1. S.E.H. memorandum dated September 6, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Lakewood Apartments plan set received August 15, 2005. • • • • • September 6, 2005 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: S E P 0 b 2005 RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Lakewood Apartments Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.10 14.00 Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Lakewood Apartments site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on August 15, 2005. Site Layout and Paving Plan (Sheet C2.0) 1. Place handicap accessible curb ramps at the end of handicap parking loading zones rather than where shown so as to not force pedestrians out into traffic lanes to access pedestrian ramps. 2. It is recommended that the parking lot be analyzed for truck turning movements to ensure that the parking layout will allow access for moving vans. Erosion Control and Grading Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. Connection to the existing sanitary stub should be made at elevation 893.61. 2. The trench drain on the north end of the main building does not have an outlet. 3. The trench drain, as shown, will conflict with the water main. 4. CBs 105 and 106 are 13 feet deep. Constructing them at this depth will be difficult and will encroach into the Mn/DOT right -of -way. 5. There are various spots in the parking lot where gutter line grades are less than the minimum allowable grade of 0.5 %. 6. Gutter tipouts must be shown on the plans. 7. In the southwest corner of the parking lot, a 908 contour is shown incorrectly (intersects curb where flowline is 907.26). 8. Spot elevations must be shown at all building corners and all curb corners in the parking lot. 9. The proposed storm sewer system does not have an outlet. All storm water runoff must be captured internally on the site and conveyed to the storm water pond to the northeast. The plans must show the construction of the entire trunk storm system all the way to the pond outlet. Even though the trunk storm line is shown on the Woods Edge Hotel submittal, this submittal must be able to stand alone and not depend on another submittal being approved and built to provide the trunk storm line. 10. The northern most building appears that it may have sidewalk sloping toward the building. 11. The proposed water main shall be looped through the hotel site to the northeast. 12. The grade at the drive entrance to Town Center Parkway will exceed 6 %. 13. Infi- Shield neoprene sealing sleeves (or equal) to be used on all manholes. Mr. Michael Grochala September 2, 2005 • Page 2 Please call me at 651.490.2147 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Robert L. Moberg, PE Project Manager nm x:\ko \lino \030510 \plan review \lakewoodapts090205 - engineering.doc • • • Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board August 31, 2005 Legacy at Woods Edge Lakewood Apartments: Plant Schedule: Crimson King maple should be changed to a species that is a bit more zone appropriate and non - invasive. Suggest changing this species to one of the following -- Northern Pin Oak, Red Oak, Bur Oak, Autumn Blaze Maple, Hackberry, American Linden, and Green Ash. Suggest changing the Colorado Blue Spruce to White Spruce or Norway Spruce. Caution and care should be taken to ensure vehicular sit -lines are not obstructed. Trees should be at least 30 feet from street corners. Eastem Red Cedars proposed for the NE corner of the building may be too close. Sod areas must be shown as irrigated. All top soils should be described as • incorporated into the sub soil for several inches. Erosion Control The developer should submit an erosion control plan that details NPDES • requirements and is acceptable to the City. The plan and inspections reports for this plan must be located on site with an indicated location on the plan. Recycling There should be a plan for organized recycling within the apartment building. Developer should work with staff on landscaping. Work with a waste service provider to make sure the plan is functional. Encourage a recycling plan. Motion by Kukonen, second by O'Connell to recommend approval with staff and Environmental Board comments and recommendations. All were in favor. Motion was approved. 1 • • • VICINITY MAP ABBREVIATIONS AC. ACOUSTIC OCT. ACOUSTIC TILE ADJ ADJACENT OR ADJUSTABLE A.F.F. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR ALUM. ALUMINUM ALT. ALTERNATE AT A.P. ACCESS PANEL ARCH. ARCHITECT O AT B0. BOARD BLDG. BUILDING BLK. BLOCK BLKG. BLOCKING SOT. BOTTOM CA CASING 1193. CABINET CEM. CEMENT CER. CERAMIC C.I. CAST IRON OW. CEILING CL CLOSET COL COLUMN CONC. CONCRETE COAST. CONSTRUCTION CONT. CUNTINUOU i CONTR. CONTRACTOR CORR. CORRIDOR CPT. CARPET CR. CARD READER C.T. CERAMIC 111.E C.W. CASEWORK OF. DETAIL DIM. DIMENSION DR. DOOR Ottl. 015H WASHER O 905. DRAWINGS EA EACH EL ELEVATION ELEV. ELEVATOR ELEC. ELECTRICAL ENGR. ENGINEER ENT. ENTRANCE EQ. EQUAL EQUIP. EQUIPMENT EXIST EXISTING EXP. EXPOSED DR EXPANSION IXf. EXIERKIR EX W /MIC EXHAUST W /MIC MATERIALS + SYMBOLS F.O. FL0014 DRAIN 800010. 880. FINISH FLOOR EL-D/01109 RUM F.E FARE EXTINGUISHER REV. FTC. FlXNIE RE0'0 FURN. FURNACE R.O. GA. GAME Rs5 GALV. GALVANIZED 5.C. GW. GROSS W2GHT SECT. CIF. GYPSUM HOLLOW CORE 5MT. HDCP. HANDICAP SIR. HDWO. HARDWOOD 5 W/D H.M. HOLLOW METAL SPEC. ORE. HORIZONTAL 510. HR OUR 57L IBC INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE S10R. INSUL INSULATION 57RUGT. TNT. INFERIOR SV. JAN. JANITOR T&C JST. JOIST T.O. JF. JOINT T.P. DIS 107. HICK DOWN TUB LAV. LA6411020 T.V. UN. LINEN CLOSET 1<8. MAIN. MNNTANENCE UBC MNNUF. MANUFACTURER LINO ht4X. MAXIMUM V.C.T. MECH. MECHANICAL V.B. MED. CAB. MEDICINE CABINET 0080_ MFR. MANUFACTURER 0021, MN. MINIMUM yW.0 N.O. MASONRY OPENING WRNS. MTL META1 N.I.C. 1401 IN CONTRACT 9.TS. NOT TO SCALE N0. NUMBER NOM. NOMINAL O.C. ON CENTER O.Q. 01021011 DIAMETER D.H. OPPOSITE HAND P.C. PRECAST PL PLATE PLAAM PLASTIC LAMINATE PR PAIR PT PANT OR POINT D.T. QUARRY TILE R. RADU15 REF. REFERENCE OR REFRIGERATOR REEL REFLECTED WD W/ w/0 W/0 YD. REFRIGERATOR REINFORCED REVISION REQUIRED RANCE/OVEN R00 0040 SHELVE 5000 CORE OR SECURITY CAMERA SECTION 5YNARE FEET SHEET SIMILAR SINK WITH DISPOSAL SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD STEEL STORAGE STRUCTURAL SIEVE VINYL TONGUE AND GROOVE TOP OF TOILER PAPER OISPENSOR BATHTUB TELEVISION TYPICAL UNIFORM BUILDING CODE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VINYL FLOOR COVERING VAPOR BARTER VERTICAL VESTIBULE NYL wALL COVERNG WAINSCOT WATER CLOSET WOOD WATER RESISTANT WITH WASHER/ DRYER WITHOUT YARD ><. CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOC( METAL STUD PARTITION FINISHED WOOD ROUGH WOOD OR BLOCKING BLOCKING OR SHIM W000 STUD PARIRIDN SOIL BORIC �- 100.0' EX151190 GRADE 0<0090ON } 1100.01 NEW GRADE ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES II-, No IU'111 SAND EARTH GRAVEL RIWOCO STEEL BATT OR L005E FAL INSULATION RIGID INSULATION ACOUSTIC TEE EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR NEW GRADE CONTOUR T ELEVATION DETAIL N0. SHEET ND. SECTION OR ELEVATION 7 SECTION MOTION ELEVA11 < 4 WALL TYPE WINDOW TYPE 000R NUMBER OFFICE-if-ROOM DESCRIPTION 10 ROOM NUMBER LAKEWOOD APARTME TS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE XXX LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA NORTH WEST COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL 1ST FL. RETAIL 14,600 S.F. 1ST -4TH FL. RESIDENTIAL (60 UNITS) 1ST FL.: 9,300 S.F. 2ND -4TH: 22,300 S.F. PER FLOOR SITE 115,139 S.F, (2.64 ACRE) I111I11111111111111111111NI1IH PROJECT TEAM LEGACY HOLDINGS-LL,LLC 12100 SINGLETREE LANE EDEN PRAIRE NN 55344 JACK BRANDT (952) 746 -1202 BRANDTOHARTFORDGRP.COM ARCHITECTURAL BERMES HARTFORD GROUP, INC. 0140900005/0<40190095 12100 SINGLE-TREE LANE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 HAL PIERCE NA (952) 746 -1206 HPERCEONNRFO8OGRP.C'OM STRUCTURAL BJCME LRIR40 HARTFORD GROUP, INC ARCHRECIS/ENGNEERS 12100 D4 PR48�NE 5U53µ CART C. REINHOLD PE (952) 746 -1237 XRENHOLDOHARIFOROCRP.COM MC-CHANDAL E:NONEEPoNO ELECTRICAL 0993 LANDSCAPE ARCF TECT<RAI. SERVICES HARTFORD GROUP INC. ARCHDECIS/NGNEERS 'pINOAR 4EDEPRIIE N 5524 PATRICK SARVER AAA (952) 746 -1210 PSAVEROFNRIFORDGRP.COM CNL E64GNEEFNM0 HARTFORD GROUP, NC. ARCHRECIS/ENLRNERS EDENO PRAIRRIE, MN 5553344 AARON ARCHBOLD. PE (952) 746 -1217 A1BCHBOLD0PARIFOIDGRP.COA GEOTEC POCAL SERVICES Ron Shaffer Braun Intertec 11001 Hampshire Ave. S. 5 pails, MN 55438 (52) (952) 995 -2200 rshafferObrauncarp.com ENVIRONMENTAL SER4CES Kevin Hoffman Braun Interlee 11001 Hampshire Ave. S Minneapolis, MN 55438 (952) 995 -2200 Mhof manObrounintertec.cam SHEET INDEX 120 TI TIME SHEET 5,671. 1.0 EXISTING SURVEY PLAN I 1.1 EXISTING SURVEY PLAN 11 C1.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C2.0 LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN C3.0 GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN 04.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN C4.1 PHOTOMETRIC 0GHTING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL 41.0 GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A1.1 1ST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Al2 290 LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 01.3 3RD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A1.3 4TH LEVEL FLOOR PUN 01.5 ROOF LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3.1 ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PUN I 032 ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN II 03.3 ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PUN 111 A5.1 ELEVATIONS I 052 ELEVATIONS II 06.1 ENLARGED ELEVATORS I 06.2 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS 11 STRIICIURAI 51.0 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN 02.0 1ST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 53.0 2■0 FLOOR FRAMING PLAN "S4.0 3RD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN "55.0 4TH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN "56.0 ROOF FRAMING PLAN 57.0 STRUCTURAL DETAILS " DRAWINGS NOT INCLUDED WITH SUBMITTAL SET 9FCH4MCAl Fl FCIRICAL AUG 1 5 2005 1 1 ^5°Y2 LAKE , FOR REVIEW ONLY AIAT CAD JP`AAICTOI 1f`•IAI►E ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 1.210,51.ms tan, MO I heed) entry 1841 Ah'e pdn, ope1TmOan or m u K pinned by ader try dint wpervcioo eye lint I on o dey 990,0 Angled under Me Nn X Me date el Mine/4N. Ode Herold ere M. P R•)drdler No. I99Q OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 12100ANG4ETREE JANE EDEN PRNwE, PN (952).716.12411 FAX (952)-716-1241 PROJECT' PROJECT NUMBER: 0HFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LLNO 19< =0, 914. ISSUE: 9/5/2005 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER: TI • • • BOU \DARY & TOPOGRAPHIC & TR FOR: HARTFORD GROUP INC =E I\ VE\ TORY SURV EY n. m., of III. a Svc.. 11, 31. lb,. __. 12100 SINGLETREE LANE, SUITE 114 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 -7933 VICINITY MAP EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BENCHMARK NOTES: - z root Contour Intend 0810 - tap goyuphyyCConeW M Odd by E.G. 8ud Sr Ste, bete., Nord end nudist of - Ileortng's down pr without Odors be - and survey ow e, mot' Mt 0 the onto those floe work eon. Inie nowt' nnIdo mtl awiopen re ee Cory elRI M aMBran to mit Meer diem, 11rb snowy 6 avbAet to revision open receipt 00 e !thee Moronss dormant., m,f r 102amey 0f6 opinion. ,08 Sol - - Cu.Crs000 were lake and other of the top and bock curb aand exNlhly DDUtlMy not Waled LEGEND • 08,.!,, Iron dammed Found oy Denote, ben Monument set A,p remotes son Darkly 4- Denote, County uenument • Denotes NW r ofe 04/1 `0. Deaete11 UMIIy Pole O 0erw10. Street 1)061 O Denote Gas Doter E Denalee Olglly Sax O Onel.. Lad. max O 0.0e4. Tdepiwn. Box ® Donator! Ronnery Sewer Nanhde ❑ e Cat. Bade 2 Dnot. Storm Sewer Mannae pd genefee Gale Volvo TX Denetse Fbe Hydroid 1,,wonArk Denotes EebIMP Lontaa Cad Wire Denote Motorman Den lee Sunnory Sewer Dole Storm Sewer 111011.2 Denotes Ea1NM0 ENwBn. Ono.. Tree one Odeon Growl Denotes Lone!. Denote. Food Paint do Denotes WOO. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE (NNW) 1 hob 50 It TREE DETAIL Ilene[.. Elevation y` y Wary # Denotes Tree owmete, In km. gene., Tree w� Nolo Ilbme of deciduous es landed eel height a conil n Pero located D 60 es CUL N 0 S89.33'45'B T L 0 .T 0 A) 0 F wa���iO1T40aNi0�li:aZPINI ITh dit; " ____ = O Os C BL CK N\ OSpr8J t0S170PP\00170_5501,413peA• 9/8/5008 54517 PM CST r _ *MN t TMI'000oot..IAVIW2,105. Aa se11111M 11dbd Der 150%00 W POOR* hoe M1C 1 Hereby cer0fy tent Ole mosey Plan 3,,» report Onset e, pe ed byma ot under orn o duly 8e0htned toed Sorwyp under fee woe of Me Stet. of MMmesafo. JASON E. RUD D Ref. • 1678 PHOTO 1 PH0T0 2 PHOTO 3 PHOTO 4 PHOTO 5 PHOTO 8 PHOTO 7 PHOTO 8 SURVEY PLAN C1.0 E. r.. 1110 & S0117 INC. LANE LE/RYETVR! 91130 LEXINGTON 6 AVE. NE RI- VS* 7,4-33M .Ai 288 TTO-0000 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS • • • • • BOU \3ARY & TOPOGRAPHIC & TR FOR: HARTFORD GROUP, INC. 12100 SiNGLETREE LANE, SUITE 114 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 -7933 PHOTO 9 PHOTO 10 PHOTO 11 PHOTO 12 PHOTO 13 PHOTO 14 MATCHUNE, SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS NAG R -E I\ VE \TORY SURV -Y NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE o 0_ z 0 0 O z m NON I les. _60 H \0 » oaS\D3170PPS0317D_bnelrytapo.Ewp 9 /U /ean3 1417 PN CST LEGEND • Sonata. Iron Firrromemt Found A Dent** Iron Monument Set y Da+otm SM end, Monument 41 Deno* Pea Slyer has Oenof.e UINny Pde Denotes street Ughl Deno* Doe Meter Deno* Mepty Rpx Denotes Cable for Denotes Telephone Rov *Woe Sanitary Sew Manhole Venatee Retch Deem g ▪ Dena. toe Slum Sevier AN** ),'( tee Fbe Hunt Dena* E.ISIb9 Centaur Dena* Overhead I.* Denate. Salome* Dena* San., sewer Denotes Storm Sewer Denote. Evblrog Fence estICSDeotee EMtbg Ebwtbn. Denotes Tree One D *Ns Grovel mote. Concrete D man Denotes Rnambep. Denotes root Perot Derwtee eagand offut Mt at ROM 110.70,1cloctottet. Ignyna Add rea .wiled CPO wt SY sa`*v VICINITY MAP FXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION JFNCHMARK NOTES: a IEARV1 — 2 loot Cpnl* Interval — MOUA. Vert** Doti* — rapegra001 Caneeled In Field by ED. Rode Sane between Marts end Aug* of 2001 — Reerhga sham are sumed *turn. — Thb euney wile Pre** *bout the *meet of IMc noA. Easements appurtenance. end aipanmreeeat of egret 10e addition ra+ce commlimentt or talemeyeitlfb *Won. *460001 b — Concrels Net Iwda and ether wriese *pro*** around orating buildings not located. — fur* shot* were taken of the lop end bock of curb. TREE DETAIL Derwin Elevation Tree Denote. else . else Ol Connelly Inches Denotes Tree Type Wee Illometer of dealmap. Seen locals and het910 ere conifer.. ere.. Ioaa.e hereby COMM" that fhb •00400 plan rePort see *lined by me or under NrtCtt super** 100 *d u I am a duly Registered load Surveyor!under the be. at the Star. of M,nnaoota 11S011 E, *UD Dot.: FeR Ns 4157e SURVEY PLAN C1.1 E r.. FUD & 3)05. INC. LAND =AS MS 8180 LE)ONGTON AVE. NE CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014 II613 .re• Ina Per) as -be.y SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS • if MMERCIAL DG: 7,000 S.F. SITE: 9,025 S.F (0.21 ACR /4- GONG ST/. TIN /1 + STAIR AND RAPP' COMMERCIAUOFFICE BLDG: 2 STORY - 18,000 TOTAL S.F. SITE: 17,831 S.F. (0.41 ACRE) 180 DECORATIVE PAVING SI /j 1ST FL. RETAIL 14,600 S.F. 1ST -4TH FL. RESIDENTIAL (60 UNITS) 1ST FL.: 9,300 S.F. 2ND -4TH: 22,300 S.F. PER FLOG SITE: 115,139 S.F. (2.64 ACRE) FINISHE! 00 rr t= JL 11= IIP;BA I� L -�L 100 - -0 CONCRETE WALK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE =NC. WALK, m. 1 irilla v■■ti ■uuf I� WPC WALK. TYR CONC. STAR CONC. WALE 1/2" W x 3/4" 0 TOOLED CONTROL JOINT (MAX. 5' 0.C. TYP.) W/ 1/4" RADII. / - -LEVEL LANDING 1.5% Nyi MAX. CROSS SLOPE" FOR DRAINAGE —LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC WITH 3' WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED EDGE 5- CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED W1.6 X W1.6 WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS AS SPECIFIED 6" CUSS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 2. 1/2' WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AT CURBS. 3. WIRE MESH REQUIRED FOR WALKS 6. WIDE OR IN LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. '7.5T y' %7.5R MAX' / aY }�/' // \ n sr =LOPE A•963// 'A' / 7.5% MAF SLOPE' _ 1 5.00' MIN. ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1 I I I I I I I I I I I1111I I11I H! fl!! I 1' WEARING COURSE TACK COAT 2" BASE COURSE 8" CUSS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1/2" RADIUS — FINISHED GRADE 1e' 3' RADIUS CORNERS —1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER 3/4 " /1' CONSTRUCT WRH REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB CURB AND GUTTER (8618) DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FINISHED GRADE NOTE: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 1O' -0" 0.C. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS 1 4)--- LAYOUT AND PAVING NOTES: --(1)- 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE 2. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. DECORATIVE PAVER UNITS AND LAYOUT SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT COLORS AND MATERIALS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDINGS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 5. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL 80 CONSTRUCTED AT ALL ENTRANCES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDINANCE 6. PARKING STALLS SHALL BE STRIPED WITH A 4" WADE WHITE PAINTED UNE. ACCESSIBLE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED UNE; 1B" ON CENTER AND AT 45' ANGLES TO THE STALL. STOP LINES SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED UNE. 7. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE EXISTING BENCHMARK AS INDICATED ON 71-10 SURVEY/EXISTING CONDITIONS DRAWING. SIGN SCHEDULE: Ta HANDICAPPED PARKING (L -34A) & 6200 FINE (L -39), VAN ACCESSIBLE (R7 -8A) MOUNT BELOW SIGN A () NO PARKING, LOADING 2O4E © RESIDENT PARKING ONLY ® STOP SIGN (91 -1) — INSTALL POSTS INTO 1 3/8" DIA. CORE HOLE NTH NON- SHRINK GROUT, CROWN FOR DRAINAGE. SEAL AS SPECIFIED (TIP.) -8"W CONCRETE SIDE WALL. HEIGHT SHALL 8E FLUSH WITH NOSE OF STAIR 1-- SPACE POSTS EQUALLY. / 4' -0" MAXIMUM 0.0. 1 1/2" DIA. BRUSHED ALUMINUM POSTS AND RAIL 1/4" SEAM WELD JOINTS. FURNISH AND INSTALL RAILING TO MATCH SLOPE OF STAIR 18" II -111 —II� 11 =11 RAILING DETAIL =11� SECTION A -A' 1/2" WIDE EXPANSON JONT- WITH SEALANT. 2 "L X 3/8' DIA. STEEL DOWEL WITH SLEEVE ' MATERIALS VARY —, SEE PLANS 8" DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE FINISHED\ GRADE —Q4 REBAR SPACED 36" 0.C. (TIP) —1' CHAMFER ON (4) FOUR SIDES OF CURB WALL —(/4 REBAR SPACED 12" 0.C. 3' CLEARANCE FINISHED GRADE 1I-T 6 + =11 III= =1 I 1 =111 =111_ SILL SEE DE ABOVE DETAIL 1/2' DIA. RADIUS / /� ON NOSE (TYP.) / / TR , AFFENOICULARrn90 S / —/3 REBAR AT NOSE 1 OF TREAD (TYP.) 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION 101141 i' BATTER TYP. r WITH SEALANT. 2 "L X 3/8" SLAT DIA. STEEL DOWEL WITH SLEEVE MATERIALS VARY (� 500 PLAN5 FINISHED GRADE 30 4411 15® AUG . 2005 =III— STAIR DETAIL I? III 4I- =111=11 =111=111= /4 REBAR SPACED 12" O.C. 3" CLEARANCE g4 REBAR (1) PER NOSE OF TREAD COMPACT SUBGRAOE —1" CHAMFER (4) FOUR EDGES OF CURB WALL 8 "H X 8"W CONCRETE WALL HANDRAIL CENTERED WITHIN WALL (1) ONE PER SIDE OF STAIR SEE ABOVE DETAIL STAIR RISER (1YP.) PLAN CONCRETE STAIR DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD R UP AP, INIC.Vir. 11 Jere* tarty MA Ne Non, o,edrioati,n aM p Fee o4 i8I 1 om a8 ry 141061 LAW.0 Witco: uncle/. the Nn A the Ada of N've®.. Merl erl LaNa. 25821 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100SNWETPEE UNE EDEN N M 9501191 200 R 1,61201 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA LSSUE: D8/18/05 009 566•I1-1A1. REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SITE LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C2.0 • / CBMH -105' RE =90A.B6 (14'- 892:1.7 IE() -891.7 156' -21" RCP. 0 0.250- 30° PCP 0 0152. CBMH 104 RE =905.8 IE(W1 =891.36 1E(S)- 891.1A, IE(E) =890. // HYDRANT W /GV GROUND EL =905.6 8"X6" REDUCER 2- 6 " -45' BENDS 8" TEE B" GATE VALVE 2 05 DO 16' -24 RCP 0 0.20 %. B" PWG 30 -8" PVC 0 0.4045 STUB I4 =693.54 I - 104 *;k � \1 DRAIN 901.50 - 697.50 B" -22.5' BEND B"- 11.25' BEND 97 WE S0100 ro7 FFE 908.00 FFE WEST 004.1:0 FFE EAST 1112-E0 WE NEW 119.03 (FE EAST 116103 - STRUCTURE SCHEDULE: GTRIX'TIIRF MH -1 MH -2 CBMH -104 CBMH -105 CB -106 SZE 48" DIA. 48" DIA 72" DIA 46" DIA. 2'43' RECT. CASINO 6-164 R -1642 R -1642 R -1642 R- 3067 -4 R- 3087 -V • NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY OR APPROVED EQUAL • VARI€�- 12"-16;- VARI 1 PLAN SECTION EXTEND 8" DIP`5TUB PRECAST INVERT MUST BE 1/2 DIAMETER OF THE PIPE AND BENCHES SLOPED 2" TOWARD THE INVERT. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF CONE AND STEPS ARE FACNG DOWNSTREAM. CASTING AND ADJUSTMENT RINGS AS S'EIFIEU. •MANHOLES SHALL BE PRECAST IN ACCORDANCE 4411 AS1M C-470 \/ MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH 619014 OR EOUAI_ 4B' ON GOITER AS APPROVED BY 091A. STEPS SHAD. BE PLACED 50 THAT OFFSET VERTICAL P051TI0H OF DONE AND STETS ARE FACING 00MHS1REAM. ALL JOINTS N MANHOLE TO HAVE "0" RING RUBBER GASKETS. PRECAST INVERT REWIRED. PIPE SHALL BE CUT WT RUSH BATH INSIDE FACE OF WALL. KOR -N -SEAL MANHOLE BOOT OR EQUAL •ALL DOG HOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON N90E AND 541000. MINIMUM THINNESS OF PRECAST BASE IS FOR <• DEEP OR LESS. AND INCREASES 6 IN THICKNESS FOR EVERY 4' OF DEPTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE VVAA E GRATE SHOWN DIRECTION OF FLOW NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED CASTING AND ADJUSTMENT RINGS AS SPECIFIED. GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW GUTTER GRADE. 10' TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCHBASIN. 24 "x36 PRECAS DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. " SECTION 2'X3' CATCH BASIN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 4' MAX " GROUTI 1 8DIP STUBI W /GV 8" PVC STUB CONNECT 71 gflElli' VERI .'2.R' i, iw" - FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE ,_„--.1.-11' � SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. rh POST yI AS METAL SPECIFIED. 2 SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4" WIRE HOOKED -.. ONTO PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUND - SURFACE CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE ,-FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED i SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CLIPS 12.0.0. ,-- ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SOIL, TAMP BACKFILL DIRECTION OF FLOW ff d ILT 1p�EN CONNECT. TO EXIST RUNOFF =��. I0- 892.61 (F)ELD V V �' infi + 15 0 - METAL POSTS WRAP 1/4" WIRE MESH AROUND SIDES OF BOX AND ATTACH TO FRAME. FILL WITH 1/2" -1" DIAMETER WASHED STONE. REPLACE WHEN SATURATED WITH SEDIMENT. 2x4 WOOD FRAME _r COLLECTED SEDIMENT OUTSIDE CB INLET (LAWN AREAS) CATCH BASIN FILTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE GRADE GRATE INLET FILTER BAG BETWEEN FRAME AND GRATE CATCH BASIN INLET NOTE: 1) IN LAWN AREAS: USE MESH, W000 FRAME BOX, AND STONE FOR INLET PROTECTION (NO BAG REQUIRED) 2) IN PAVED AREAS, USE FILTER BAG FOR INLET PROTECTION ( 140 MESH, BOX STONE REQUIRED) '9' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING. 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH '4' OVERLAP: BUR( UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND '8'. OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP .� 4" AND STAPLE 1e 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN D.L.' TRENCH AND TAMPED OOUBLEROW OF STAPLES PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATDNG FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH 'E'OVERFALL,, • \ � IJ_ TYPICAL STAPLE 18 GAUGE WIRE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TO CONSTRUCTION AREA 7 NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL PLAN TO CONSTRUCTION AREA 6" MIN CRUSHED STONE 75' MINIMUM r-GEOTEXTLE FILTER FABRIC EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY 4. -- EROSION CONTROL NOTES: -4- 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IN AD01710N TO OTHER MEASURES THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVI7ES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDINANCE. 2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. THIS MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE CLEANING AND /OR REPLACING SYSTEMS THAT HAVE BECOME CLOGGED OR NO LONGER FUNCTIONAL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT MONTHLY AND AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO INSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND SATISFACTORY DISPOSAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK AND SOIL STABIUZATION AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 30 LF. OF SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE OUTLET OF EACH STORM DRAIN PIPE TO CONTROL AND MINIMIZE SILT RUNOFF. LEGEND: 418 420 + 422.0 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 5' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF EROSION CONTRO0 BLANKET 4.--GRADING NOTES: -4- 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO LOANING AND SODDING ACTIVITIES 2. UNSUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL. AS SPECIFIED. SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF -SITE. 3. SUITABLE EXCESS F1LL MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED IN A MANNER AND LOCATION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOWLINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. 6. LONGITUDINAL SLOPES OF WALKS SHALL BE 57. (MAX.) AND 145 (MIN.) AND 2% (MAX) CROSS SLOPE EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL REQUIRE SURFACE ROUGHENING BY EITHER "STAIRSTEP" GRADING, GROOVING, FURROWING, OR TRACKING TO AVOID RUNOFF VELOCITY AND RECEIVE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. SLOPES LESS THAN 3:1 NOT STABIUZED 10TH VEGETATON SHALL HAVE THE SURFACE ROUGH GRADED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY UNTIL 50D HAS BECOME STABILE AND MATURE AT NO TIME THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT, SHALL SLOPES BE A SMOOTH GRADE OR A COMPACTED SURFACE. 4- UTILITY NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 2. ALL EXISTING UTI0TY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651- 454 -0002 OR 800 - 252 -1180) FOR UTUTY LOCATONS, 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. UT1UTY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE UNE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA, AND SHALL CONFORM WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS 4. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 5. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) CLASS 52 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) 5DR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONRETE PIPE (RCP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. B. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURES. 9. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE 5UMP0 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 10. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND EXISTING UNDISTURBED BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOTES. PROFILE PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP 5501804T. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED. DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY 0H4 ENGINEER. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 11. TYPICAL HYDRANT CONSISTS 0F: HYDRANT, GATE VALVE. 2.5' OF 6" DIP WATERMAIN AND ANY HYDRANT EXTENSION. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS SMALL BE INCIDENTAL 12. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN I5 INCIDENTAL 13. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION I5 REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND SIZES WITHIN THE BUILDING WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 15. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND 50400090 OF NEW UTILITIES. IRRIGATION SYSTEM, AND UNDERDRAINS WATH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD d/�NS I,I j100 SkAgrem „IV. BE 70x11104 .70•. 1 tad, cert ify Md AS PMA PIC+TOd'on er rq veveer Peoorel h me or untls m, 0, fired s oenidm our IRA I em o Ole Lbs. InnNxNpe Area tst under Be bn dMe date d R'WmMO. Ode PMG Lk Na 24904 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 1210SINGLETREE 1000 EDEN PRAIRIE, RN 952- 716120 9470720/ PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 09 /05/05 CRT SUBMITTAL REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C3.0 • \\0. "AO i�1 • MEDIAN it CONCRETE CURB LANDSCAPE MEDIAN - OVERSTORY, MID - STORY. AND UNDER STORY PLANTINGS - NUMBERS OF PLANTS IS DICTATED BY S.F. OF MEDIAN. ._:PARKING LOT TYPICAL PARKING LOT ISLAND SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1ST FL. RETAIL 14,600 S.F. 1ST -4TH FL. RESIDENTIAL (60 UNITS) 1ST FL.: 9,300 S.F. 2ND -4TH: 22,300 S.F. PER FLOOR SITE: 115,139 S.F. (2.64 ACRE) O- a 'a" a Ogi"tt - • az ff his rwcnw: 15 0 50 � II W :.. T .r-1!Jle _IEl ! 1+311 iI l-1T H 147-LT-11747 TH EE TIMES WIDTH �OF ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHRECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2"X4'X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120' TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1' -2' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE 4' SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH 2' FROM TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IF NON- BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE — BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW R00T3ALL IT:'': I 11111111I – ITL' -=� � TRT%0-1111 THEE TIMES WIDTH — f ❑F RDOTBALL EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE r. �f�Hl�`III�111 ' THREE TIMES WID OF RDDTBALL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL ICI TH NOT TO SCALE - PLANTING SCHEDULE QTY. COMMON NAME DECIDUOUS TREES 000190L1. LANDSCAPING NOTES: — 1. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4' MIN. LAYER LOAM AND WASHED SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS AREAS WITHIN STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL RECEIVE LOAM AND SOD WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. SEE SOD INSTALLATION NOTES BELOW. 2. LOCATIONS OF DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD U1LITE5, UGHTNG FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS, AND STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE BALLED AND BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP. 4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4' LAYER OF SHREDDED CYPRUS$ OR CEDAR MULCH ON TOP OF A NM-BIODEGRADABLE FILTER FABRIC AND BORDERED WITH 3/16' THICK STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGING. 5. RAINGARDEN AND INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE WETLAND SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED. 6. ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. - SODDING INSTALLATION: 1. THE LOAM AND SOIL SHALL BE 4' LAYER MINIMUM, LOOSENED, AND FREE OF CLODS, ROCKS, AND DEBRIS. 2. AREAS TO RECEIVE S00 SHALL BE FERTILIZED WITH 25 POUNDS PER 1000 SQ.FT. (1005 L13/05) OF 10 -10-10 FERTILIZER AND WORKED INTO THE TOPSOIL 3. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DAMPENED PRIOR TO LAYING THE SOD. JOINTS IN THE SOD SHALL BE STAGGERED, AND THE EDGES BUTTED TOGETHER TIGHTLY TO AVOID CAPS BETWEEN SOD LENGTHS. 4. SOD INSTALLED ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER, OR IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOWS. SHALL BE STAKED IN PLACE. INSTALL THE 50D 111111 T1-10 LENGTH PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATER FLOW FOR SLOPES WITH SHEET FLOW. 5. AFTER INSTALLATION, AREAS SHALL BE TAMPED OR ROLLED TO PROVIDE GOOD CONTACT BETWEEN SOD AND SOIL AFTER ROWNG, THE SOD SHOULD BE WATERED 50 THAT 114E SOIL IS MOISTENED 4 INCHES BELOW THE SOD. - SODDING MAINTENANCE: — 1. 114 THE ABSENCE CIF ADEQUATE RAINFALL, WATER WRING THE 30 DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING SOD PLACEMENT TO KEEP SOIL MOIST. FOLLOWING TH10 INITIAL 30 DAY ESTABUSHMENT PERIOD. WATER AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE MOISTURE IN THE ROOT ZONE. 2. WHERE MOWNC IS DESIRED, MAINTAIN GRASS HEIGHT OF 3 INCHES AND SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED UNTIL THE SOD IS FIRMLY ROOTED, USUALLY TWO TO THREE WEIX5 AFTER SOD IS LAID. 3. INSPECT AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW ANNUALLY AND FOLLOWING INTENSE STORMS. MAKE NEEDED REPAIR AND REVEGETATE PROMPTLY. SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS: --4- 1. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE MNDOT 60B AND INSTALLED NO LATER THAN JUNE 15TH. IF PLANING OCCURS AFTER AUGUST 15TH, SEED WITH A NURSE CROP OF RYE NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 5TH. IF PLANTING HAS NOT OCCURRED BY OCTOBER 5TH. THEN DORMANT SEED THE SITE NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 15T. A I IC BOTANICAL NAME ROOT SIZE COMMENTS PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTEO BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2'K4'XB' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120' TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1' -2' ABOVE D5011NG GRADE 3' SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH 2' FROM TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL IF NON - BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHTECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE) PLANT TOP OF ROO-MALL 1 -2' SURROUNDING ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 4' SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH DO NOT BURT STEMS OR TRUNK 051511NG GRAD R00T5 AT OUTER E EDGE OF R00T5ALL CONTACT ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO -ROOT COMACT —SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE 4 —BACKFILL AS PER pet SPECIFICATION —DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW r) AUTUMN SPIRE RED MAPLE - CRIMSON KING MAPLE - SUNBURST HONEY LOCUST - PRAIRIE SPIRE ASH - GREENSPIRE LINDEN Acer rubrum 'Autumn 5otre' B&B 2 1/2° CAL Acer Metalloid. 'Crimson Kina' B&B 2 1/2' CAL 010011510 Triocenthas Var. Inermis '00060 /,' B&B 2 1/2' CAL Froxlnus oennsvlvanlaa 'Ruabv B &B 2 1/2' CAL 11114 eord0to 'Greened /re B &B 2 1/2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM CONIFERIOUS TREES COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE - EASTERN RED CEDAR Picea Pungens Juniperus vlrginiona B &B 6' HT. B&B 6' AT STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM ORNAMENTAL TREES SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE - JAPANESE TREE LILAC - PAGODA DOGWOOD - PAPER BIRCH MMus 'Sprinq Snow' Syringe reticulate Cornue aliemifelio Betula paperifero B &B 1 1/2' CAL B &B 1 1/2' CAL B &B 1 1/2" CAL B &B 1 1/2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER-MULTI-STEM STRAIGHT LEADER -MULTI-STEM DECIDUOUS SHRUBS - COMPACT PJM RHODODENDRON IVORY HALO DOGWOOD - LITTLE PRINCESS SPIRAEA COMPACT BURNING BUSH - GREEN VELVET BOXWOOD - ROYAL BURGUNDY BARBERRY CONIFERIOUS SHRUBS TECHNY ARBORVITAE MUGHO 5LOWMOUND - GOLDEN AR80RIV1TAE - DWARF BLUE GLOBE SPRUCE Rhododendron 'P.J.M. Compact Comue alba '9005010' 5piroe0 010on105 'Little Princess' Euanxnus °lotus 'Comoactus' BUN. x 'Green Velvet Berbers thinbergii 'Gentry Cultivor' Thula omldenlHis 'Techn/ Pinus muao '9awmound' Thujo ooAldentalis ourea Pitta oun0ens 'Globose' CONT. 36° HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4 0.C. CONT. 36' HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0.C. CONT. 36' HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0.C. CONT. 35' HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0 C. CONT. 24" HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' O.C. CONT. 24" HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0.C. CONT. 6' HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 5' O.C. CONT. 36" HT, DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0 0 CONT. 30' HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' O.C. CONT. 30' AIL BRANCH -SPACE 4' O.C. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD =EZ w pea*�la MO .: MRPaum I gently may 100 this am, ep RWO6 or np5V sae roared by me er under ny drect a,pnnimn ad tMl I am , dN Lamed 100,0000 Architect under de Im d the sate al Manes.. Rebel Lk... ! 1 Ia 25821 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 121009NQETREF LA. 1620 PRAIRIE, MU 956710.1100 90- 710.1611 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 08/15/05 CITY 50900141 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C5.0 • • :` cow 1ST FL. RETAIL 14,600 S.F. 1ST -4TH FL. RESIDENTIAL (60 UNITS) 1ST FL.: 9,300 S.F. 2ND -4TH: 22,300 S.F. PER FLOOR SITE: 115,139 S.F. (2.64 ACRE) �l — LIGHTING NOTES: ---4- DISCLAIMER These calculations or NOT valid for owner or city opproval using any - non —ALD represented product' or fixtures not shown on this pion. Fixtures must be provided by ALD. Calculations have been performed with our best interpretation of the details given to us Some differences between measured and calculated results may occur due to intolerances in calculation methods, testing procedures, component performance, measurement techniques and field conditions such as vtltoge, temperature variations, lump manufacturer variations, and other variables. Calculations do not take into consideration objects such as, but not limited to, trees, bu9dings, pavement, sidewalk or cars. Calculation values represent harizentol (i.e. light meter facing straight up) illuminance FC levels (unless otherwise noted). If the real environment conditions do not match the input data, differences will occur between measured values and calculated values. ALD is not responsible for acquiring or interpreting ony local lighting codes. These lighting calculations are not o substitute for independent engineering analysis by a professional engineer. TYPE C- Canopy light TYPE E- Parking Lot TYPE B -Wall mount TYPE D -Sign light 1 TYPE F -Tree uptight TYPE G -Step light Z005 TYPE K -Wa kway fixture FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD U,... r..: amnNla. CONSULTANT: ARCHITEGTAAL LIGHTING WSW; INC. TT. N 5.111 2920 ANTNZNY LANE ANTHONY, N su OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 10300 SINaaEMEE LANE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN. 951479412LO 95247961201 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 0e /IS /050IR suD1eIIAL REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.1 • • GARAGE LEVEL BLDG. FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/16 " =1' -0" NOTE: i PARKING H UNOBSTRUCTED HEADROOM CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN J O'ABOVE FLOOR T0 ANY GERING BEAM. PIPE. OR SIMILAR OBSTRUCTOR, EXCEPT FOR WALL— MONN1ED SHELVES, RACKS. OR CABINETS. GARAGE GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF BLOCK WALL. OR TO CENTER UNE OF INT. WALLS. 2. SEE ENLARGED PLANS FOR WALL T(PE DESIGNATIONS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. S. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR UN1EL SCHEDULES @ ALL 014401 STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. IF ANY 0SCREPANCES OCCUR 6Ei1FEN THE ARCHITECTURAL MECHANICAL it STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TIE STRUCTURAL DRAWING SHALL GOVERN. IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 4. VERIFY LDCATICN OF PLUMBING @ FIXTURES WITH MECHANICAL OWLS. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. S VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BREAKER PANELS & FIXTURES 99TH THE ELECTRICAL DWn5. IF ELEC. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR CONTRACTOR SHALL N011FY THE NOHITECT IMMEDIATEL, 6. VERIFY LOCATION 00 6E1E95 PATH MECH. @ ELECTRICAL DW6 IF DISCREPANCIES OCCUR NOTIFY 00616ACTOR IMMEDIATELY 7. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS 90111 OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. COOR0NAT: WITH MECH OW/GS AND IRRIGATOR CONTRACTOR. B. REF. CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE 0WG5 FOR STE INFORMATION NOT !ROCKED ON THIS PLAN 9. ALL FIRE EXTNGUISHER5 SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS 64114 LOCATION STORAGE AS REWIRED BY CODE AND OTT OF me FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE. 10. PROVIDE FREE STOPPING AT ALL PENETRATIONS IN RATED WALL ASSEMBUE5. SEE SECTOR 07270. 11. CABINET FRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON CM WALLS SHALL $ SURFACED MOUNTED (TIP.) REF. DETAIL 16/29.1 12 ALL REWIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL OPERATE FROM IN509 WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR 13. EXIT LIGHTING SHALL BE 114 APPROVED LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY ELECTRICAL 000E 14. REFER TO O M ER FOR PANIC 5TATIGN LOCATIONS. COORDINATE WITH ELEC. 15. REF. SIT. A9.1 FER 56NAGE EXTENT AND LOCATION 16. MAINTAIN POSITIVE SERE TO ALL FLOOR DRAINS. HOLD ALL DOGES AT 11.F.E■90 17. PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINAGE TILE TO EXTEND FROM HIGH PT. 0 CENTER CF BUILDING TO LOW PT. AT SUMP PIT LOCATIONS CONNECT TO SLAP PIT. PROVIDE TILE O AREA WELL F0011145 @ CONNECT TO PERIMETER TILE 16. PROTECT ALL MECH @ ELEC. EQUIPMENT. METERS, AND SYST04S MN BOLLARDS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATORS REF. DETAIL 15/19.1 19. MECH. TO PROA0E PROTECTION FROM FREEZING FOR ANY PIPES LOCATED 8811115 20' OF GARAGE 000R. 20. EXACT AREA WELL LOCATOR TO 6E APPROVED BY OWNER AND MECH. CONTRACTOR. 21. REF. 54415. A11.1 @ A11.2 FOR ROOM FINISH k DOOR 5CHEDULE5 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD E 1 k NGROW 10 LIeNWw,. "s"1m Fatir3, •lui I he,my whit' that the 9hn, wdwthm or 09 eve P4md M/ my or mar rM dad supervision od I vm v A9 ReyMered /get. w40, y 6m NN hn N 1!W stem W Mmn ®lo. Db�00 R4RHm99n 66. 10652 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP ]]LW 5BIGLETRH LANE EDEN PRAIRIE, RN (976)-79741260 FA%(976)-74741201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MNFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN. ISSUE: 5/5/2005 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A1.0 9. -11" 12' -1" 23' -0" 12' -1 22' -7" 85'- 11T: V 200' -614" 39, -3" 51' -*" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALErI/4'e1.Q' WR1 UNIT TVP1 BALAR08D ROOK RffJ eHT. ORO88 IN RR 70T LAVIL 111017 - TOTAL ND YlN eF SP • 2 1.5 A3.1 1,024 959 0 0 0 IS 2 1.5 A3.1 1,055 990 0 0 o 2 1.5 A3.1 992 928 0 0 0 0 2 1.5 23.1 1,023 958 0 0 0 B 3 1.75 A32 1,270 1,190 4 5,090 4,780 F 3 1.75 222 1,285 1,149 1 1,285 1,190 0 3 1.75 432 1,250 1,170 0 0 0 N 3 1.75 232 1,255 1,175 0 0 0 4M0A5 3 2 A3.3 1,377 1,277 0 0 0 R 9 225 23.9 1.259 1.159 1 1,209 1,189 TOTAL 6 GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF BLOCK WALL, OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL, OR TO CENTER LINE OF WINDOWS & INT. WALLS. 2 REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS & BUILDING WING FLOOR PLANS FOR ALL WALL TYPE, DOOR & WINDOW DESIGNATIONS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND, DOOR, WINDOW, ROOM FINISH SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 2. VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING & FIXTURES WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 4. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BREAKER PANELS 8 FIXTURES WITH THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IF ELEC. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 8 REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR LINTEL SCHEDULES 8 ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL. MECHANICAL 8 STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN. IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. B . REF. CTRL AND LANDSCAPE DINGS FOR BITE INFORMATION NOT INDICATED ON THIS PION. 7. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE HCAP SYMBOL ARE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE UNITS. REFER TO ENLARGED PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 8 REFERENCES TO ACCESSIBLE CRITERIA B. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH MECH DINGS AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 9. SECURITY CAMERAS TO BE LOCATED BY OWNER AND COORDINATE WTTH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 10. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURRED CHASES AND SOFFITS REQUIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL, DUCTS. PIPING, FIRE SUPPRESSION PIPING, AND ELECTRICAL WIRING. VERIFY LOCATION AND S12E REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPING AT ALL PENETRATIONS IN RATED WALL 003589LIE8. SEE SECTION 07270 12. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS WITH LOCATION SIGNAGE AS REQUIRED BY CODE AND CITY OF MX FIRE MARSHAL VS OFFICE. 13. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON GYP. BO. WALLS SHALL SE SEMI- RECESSED -SEE DETAIL /CO( FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON CMU WALLS SHALL BE SURFACED MOUNTED (TYP.) 14. ALL REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL OPERATE FROM INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. 15. EXIT LIGHTING SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY ELECTRICAL CODE. 18. EXACT AREA WELL LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND MECH. CONTRACTOR. 17. REF. BHT. XXX FOR 81GNAGE EXTENT AND LOCATION 19. REF. SHT. XXX FOR ROOM FINISH & DOOR SCHEDULES 19. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL KITCHEN AND BATH SINK PIPES. 20. PROVIDE METAL STRAP BRACING AT OUTSIDE CORNER OF BUILDING OR FULL VERTICAL 4 X 8 SHEET OF GYPSUM SHEATHING. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTF I I ;r.GRotillINC ORD BNdya X.s�rz:w Ds2 rwvm I IPA/ w9F7 Bat U§ Plan, A YrAINn 8 0 ,Nm PFObd Gy mew erd" my dnd BRNVw'09 en, Bid I em a duly WM. Re/0 40 0 080,. udP BR Iva of The Sok d Mmmm. *80(177055 Dote Re5WNdn No. 10082 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 12100 DANGLfl9EE LANE EDEN MUTED, MN RE2)4761300 FPX(953 )-7141201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE er;c TTWL LINO IA0ff5, MN. ISSUE: 3/5/2005 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A1.1 • • 291' -3" SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 51 -5Y?" SCALE:174 ".1'A" YARN UNIT 7165 ■NIAROEC FLOOR PLAN REF. ENT. OROE8 IF NET AI LEVEL EEO EATH UNIT TOTAL OROUNET AV EF 2 1.5 53.1 1,024 860 ,024 959 • 2 1.5 A3.1 1,055 NO 1 1,069 900 C 2 1.5 43.1 093 928 1 883 928 O 2 1.5 A9.1 1.029 058 1,028 858 • 3 1.75 102 1210 1,190 B 10,100 9,520 F 3 1.75 032 1288 1,109 2 2,672 2,395 O 1 1.75 A32 1280 1,170 1 1,250 1,170 N 3 1.75 A32 1255 1,175 1 1256 1,175 J6110AP 3 2 033 1.377 1,277 1 1277 1,271 K 3 225 033 1,289 1,169 1,259 1,189 TOTAL 16 22,096 20.552 GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF BLOCK WALL, OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL, OR TO CENTER UNE OF WINDOWS 8INT. WALL5. 2 REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS & BUILDING WING FLOOR PLANS FOR ALL WALL TYPE, DOOR B WINDOW DESIGNATIONS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND. DOOR, WINDOW, ROOM F01131 SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3. VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING A FOTURES WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 4. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BREAKER PANELS & FD(TURES WITH THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR P ELEC. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR LINTEL SCHEDULES 8 ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL 8 STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN. IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 8. REF. CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE OWG5 FOR SITE INFORMATION NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. 7. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE RCAF SYMBOL ARE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE 35775. REFER TO ENLARGED PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 8 REFERENCES TO ACCESS ®LE CRITERIA 8. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OW4E5 AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH MECH DWGS AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 9. SECURITY CAMERAS TO BE LOCATED BY OWNER AND COORDNATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 10. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURRED CHASES AND SOFFITS REQUIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL, DUCTS, PIPING, FIRE SUPPRESSION PIPING, AND ELECTRICAL WIRING. VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPING AT ALL PENETRATIONS N RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. SEE SECTION 07270. 12. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS WITH LOCATION 510NAGE AS REQUIRED BY CODE AND CRY OF X.)3( FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE. 19. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON GYP. BD. WALLS SHALL BE SEMI. RECESSED -SEE DETAIL XI(X FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON CMU WALLS SHALL BE SURFACED MOUNTED (IYP.) 14. ALL REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL OPERATE FRO/A INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. 15. EMT LIGHTING SHALL BE APPROVED LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY ELECTRICAL CODE. 18. EXACT AREA WELL LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND MECH. CONTRACTOR 17. REF. SHT. XXX FOR 01GNAGE EXTENT AND LOCATION 18. REF. SHT. XXX FOR ROOM FINISH 8 DOOR SCHEDULES 13. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL KITCHEN AND BATH SINK PIPES. 20. PROVIDE METAL STRAP BRACING AT OUTSIDE CORNER OF BUILDING OR FULL VERTICAL 4 X B SHEET OF GYPSUM SHEATHING. ib 20D5 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER n ' HARTFORD OROUPA/INC �orpeauR. suu:vc M lU+s�ena� I SFWy cerbly Bat SS Mon, gm1xa&m P /sport ne meowed 81 me or 200 my dnct e87.110n 112 UM I em v AA, Rep*rd NRBied m4e1 BM Nn M Be 549/8 of I881rude. Nor* 11. RPm Re91174' NN IWS[ OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 12100 SINGIFIREE LANE EDEN H71NE, MN (952}1401210 FAX 1952 }115 -1201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN. ISSUE: 0/0 /2005 ._1 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A1.2 • • • 291' -3" THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ICAL.t1 /4•.1' -0° MARK UNIT TTPE RMLARam PLODS CLAM RIP. MT. GROSS if MST SF 31112 LS SSO YT11 UNIT TOTAL 6308160// S' SF A 2 15 A3.1 1,024 959 1 1,024 969 R 2 13 A3.1 1.056 900 1 1356 990 O 2 1.5 A3.1 983 526 1 003 025 O 2 1.5 031 1,026 955 1 1.028 056 E 3 135 A32 1,270 1,190 5 10,150 8.620 F 3 175 A32 1,286 1,199 2 2572 2396 0 3 1.75 A32 1250 1,170 1 1250 1.170 N 3 175 A32 1.255 1,173 1 1255 1,175 JHICAP 3 2 03.3 1,377 1,277 1 1,377 1277 3 2.25 03.3 1269 1,109 1 1,289 1,181 TOTAL 15 22,008 20,562 GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF BLOCK WALL. OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL OR TO CENTER UNE OF WINDOWS & INT. WALLS. 2 REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS & BUILDING WING FLOOR PUNS FOR ALL WALL TYPE, DOOR & WINDOW DESIGNATIONS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PUN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND, DOOR, WINDOW, ROOM FINISH SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, 3. VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING & FIXTURES WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 4. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BREAKER PANELS 0 FIXTURES WITH THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IF ELEC. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PUNS FOR LINTEL SCHEDULES 0 ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL 05154074RAL DRAWINGS, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN. IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. e. REF. CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE GWGS FOR SITE INFORMATION NOT INDICATED ON TH18 PLAN. 7. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE HCAP SYMBOL ARE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE UNITE. REFER TO ENLARGED PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONS REFERENCES TO ACCESSIBLE CRITERIA B. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR COORDINATE WITH MECH DWGS AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR 9. SECURITY CAMERAS TO BE LOCATED BY OWNER AND COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 10. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURRED CHASES AND 60FF19 REQUIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL. DUCTS. PIPING, FIRE SUPPRESSION PIPING, AND ELECTRICAL WIRING, VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPING AT ALL PENETRATIONS IN RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. SEE SECTION 07270. 12. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS WITH LOCATION SIGNAGE AS REQUIRED BY CODE AND CITY OF /034 FIRE MARSHALU8 OFFICE. 13. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON GYP. BD. WALLS SHALL BE SEMI - RECESSED - SEE DETAIL X100 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON CMU WALLS SHALL 8E SURF/IMO MOUNTED (TYP.) 14. ALL REQUIRED EX? DOORS SHALL OPERATE FROM INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. 15. EMT LIGHTING SHALL SE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED SY ELECTRICAL CODE. 16. ENACT AREA WELL LOCATIONS TO SE APPROVED BY OWNER AND MECH. CONTRACTOR 17. REF. BHT. XXX FOR SIGNAGE EXTENT AND LOCATION 1B. REF. SIR. /0 X FOR ROOM FINISH & DOOR SCHEDULES 19. PUCE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL KITCHEN AND BATH SINK PIPES. 20. PROVIDE METAL STRAP BRACING AT OLRSIDE CORNER OF BUILDING OR FULL VERTICAL 4X 0 SHEET OF GYPSUM SHEATHING. r,Ic i 1 t r FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER p HARTFORD Z:44,42,4I1C Pao OS. NR:(1507+6vm I be6T s68 22( this Pan. *cacao or diset nod i .perv2' iM 62 I em o Arty RgMeed ATRIA Oder Co a. of 188 Sated Combo. Harold M. Pec RB250*43 No. 10582 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 12100 S1NGLETRE UNE EDEN MANDE, (99}796120060 88(953)-7461201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: 4474 -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIT LINO LAKES, MN. ISSUE: 1/0 /2222 REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A1.3 • • FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1 /44.1•4r 11'11'' UNIT TYPE !ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN REP. IR. ORDee aF NET eF PTN LEVEL "D SATIN UNIT r07µ DR095NET aF 1F A 2 13 1558 990 1 1,029 950 D 2 15 03.1 1,058 990 1 1,068 928 O 2 15 .1 020 1 928 D 2 13 90 A3.1 1,02.02 8 955 t 1,028 .02 958 • 3 1.75 522 1,210 1,190 8 10260 9.520 F 3 1.75 032 1.238 1,199 2 2572 2.596 O 3 1.75 A32 1,250 1,170 1,250 1,170 N 3 1.75 A32 1,255 1,178 1 1295 1,179 4'14OAP 3 2 533 1377 1,277 1 1.971 1 ,277 K 3 225 43.3 1,289 1.189 1 1,289 1,189 TOTAL 18 32,006 20,992 GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF BLOCK WALL. OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL, OR TO CENTER UNE OF WINDOWS & WT. WALLS. 2 REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS & 823101NG WINO FLOOR PLANS FOR ALL WALL TYPE, DOOR & WINDOW DESIGNATIONS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND, DOOR, WINDOW, ROOM FINISH SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, 3. VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING & FIXTURES WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 4, VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BREAKER PANELS 8 FIXTURES WITH THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. IF ELEC. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. REFER 70 STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR LINTEL SCHEDULES 8 ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL. MECHANICAL 8 STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN. IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SWLLL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 8, REF. CARL AND LANDSCAPE OWLS FOR SITE INFORMATION NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. 7. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE HCAP SYMBOL ARE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE UNITS. REFER TO ENLARGED PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION a REFERENCES TO ACCESSIBLE CRITERIA 8 VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR COORDINATE WITH MECH OWLS AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 9. SECURITY CAMERAS TO BE LOCATED BY OWNER AND COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 10. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURRED CHASES AND SOFFITS REWIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL. DUCTS, PIPING, FIRE SUPPRESSION PIPING, AND ELECTRICAL WIRING. VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPING AT ALL PENETRATIONS IN RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. SEE SECTION 07270 12. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS WITH LOCATION 313500E AS REQUIRED BY CODE AND env OF XXX FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE. 13. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON GYP. BD. WALLS SHALL BE SEMF RECESSED - SEE DETAIL )03( FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON CMU WALLS SHALL BE SURFACED MOUNTED (TYP.) 14. ALL REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL OPERATE FROM INSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT, 15. EXIT LIGHTING SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY ELECTRICAL CODE. 15. EXACT AREA WELL LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED EY OWNER AND MECH. CONTRACTOR 17. REF. 557. (OX FOR SIGNAGE EXTENT AND LOCATION 10. REF. SH7.XXX FOR ROOM FINISH 5 DOOR SCHEDULES 19. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL KITCHEN AND BATH SINK PIPES. 20. PROVIDE METAL STRAP BRACING AT OUTSIDE CORNER OF BUILDING OR FULL VERTICAL 4 X 8 SHEET DF GYPSUM SHEATHING. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD `GROUP A/E_W >m uam190 NT.47r61E0 Ia(mF1F12M IN 000810489 IO', s08 rRa'1 Fa Nepal by He o undo Ey Intl uperriim and Dd I um o duly ReAWArtl t at h. ENE ON D,N 8a No7d N. Fav Ode AVENGE No. 10882 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP SINGLE-MEE UNE EDEN SMILE, 5 (962)-7261200 108(384.794 -1201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MNFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE V5WGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN. ISSUE: 5/3/2065 G REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITTLE: FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A1.4 • • o f I ROOF LEVEL BLDG. FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /16 " -1' -0" • GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE CF BLOCK WALL. OUTSIGE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL. OR TO CENTER UNE OF PARDONS & NT. WALLS 2. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS k BUIIDNG WING FLOOR PLANS FOR ALL WALL TYPE, 0008 & %1ND0W DESIGNATORS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND, DOOR. WINDOW. ROOM F64154 SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. S VERFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING & FIXTURES YOH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. R' MECH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 4. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BREAKER PANELS & FIXTURES YAW 114E ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. IF sac. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR LINTEL SCHEDULES & ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. IF ANT OISCREPANOES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN. IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 6. REF. CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DINGS FOR STE INFORMATION NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. 7. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE HCAP SYMBOL ARE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE UNITS. REFER TO ENLARGED PUNS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION & REFERENCES TO ACCESSIBLE CRITERIA. B. VERIFY LOCATOR OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS W11H OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR COORDINATE WITH MECH DWCS AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 9. SECURITY CAMERAS TO BE LOCATED BY OWNER AND COORDINATE 4W0H ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 10. CARPENTER TO PRUDE ALL FURRED CHASES AND SOFFITS REQUIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL DUCTS, PIPING FIRE SUPPRESSOR PIPING, A140 ELECTRICAL WRRNG. VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL A140 ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPNG AT All PENETRATIONS IN RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. SEE SECTOR 07270. 12. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATORS WIN LOCATOR SWAGE AS REQUIRED BY 000E AND 0TY OF XXX FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE 15, FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON GYP. ED. WALLS SHALL BE SEMI— RECESSED — SEE DETAIL XXX FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON MU WALLS SHALL BE SURFACED MOUNTED (TYP.) 14. ALL REWIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL OPERATE FR01.1 INSIDE WTHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. 15. EXIT UGHTNG SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATORS AS REQUIRED BY ELECTRICAL 000E 16. EXACT AREA WELL LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND MECH. CONTRACTOR. 17. REF. SIT. XXX FOR SGNACE EXTENT AND LOCATION 18. REF. SIT. XXX FOR ROOM FINISH & DOOR SCHEDULES 1S PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL KITCHEN AND BATH 5NK PIPES. 20. PROVDE METAL STRAP BRACING AT OUTSIDE CORNER OF WILDING OR FULL VERTICAL 4 X B 91007 OF GYPSUM SHEATHING. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD pOROUP A%E�INC. 121(011.1eree Iasemw 174 140P<Met I hereby ae6Ty BWI tie plan. 5 Tratim rmWR Wa Frepord M me W N. my baM Npn*en and MI 1 am a duly *WARS tatted Inky Be Me al Be NNW el Irmemla. Weld M. P DW R884lralim No. 10512 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 121005NGIEHREE LINE EDEN PRAIRIE,IRN CS] }7961ID0 FAX (962)-766-120/ PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: 84FA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN. ISSUE: 8/5/2005 .__ REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ROOF LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A1.5 y. -MECH. GRI ROSE HOOK TOWEL RACK FULL WIDTH MIRROR T.P. DIS. FULL WIDTH MIRROR WI MED. CAB. ROBE HOOK T.P. 015. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK ROBE HOOK SHOWER ROD FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. TOWEL RACK T.P. DIS. —TOWEL RACK ROBE HOOK ,-SHOWER ROD TP 05 TOWEL RACK 3. -' L. FUL'i WIDTH MIRROR MED. CAB. • J•.s. t9' -'.[• / 0•. 2 tY' -Q1'2^ • f. Y b 3' -1• / 10• -3' S' -]• 2• -0•/ BEDROOM2 - S' -11• 2'-0• 2•- 191¢•/ 1 -+ l3 • \ J EG1T:. RILL . / r / j' /• U b I^� " tp. / BATH el I E/ SV IVC BEDROOMI i I MECH. y` ^ M1 n _ • CPT1 VCT CT CPTi ; \t1' . J' '.. CPT7 1 2 CL3 t n _ ._ _ L. IN. L2 ' �(y�+ � 11 DINING x - VCT OMB ■ - IS W ,CL1_.-- :' wDTR1M6CAP SURROUND W/ �— 1227 V LA V ENTRY j� SOFFIT .BAR/ ;' '.ISLAND M1T �'. +VCT REF MK: I; \ KTCHN umw/EJC " i `� '+J 0 immust� CPT1 /JJcPT1 4'' Y -5• 4• -a• +C -l) " 1024 GROSS SF 959 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4•.1' -O' 23• -0• 12'-2• 3' -1• / 10• -3' S' -]• 2• -0•/ - S' -11• 2'-0• 2•- 191¢•/ 1 -+ l3 • \ S• �' -9 3' -11• 3.-C 4' -9• / r / j' /• MECH. G LL MTL RAI ING HALF W PRES$U E TREATED 2X: AWAY F OM BLDG. / Wi t BEDR ,■■ MECH =' PO 11 GREAT ROOM LL — OMB ■ __ B DR M2 is $ CL2 C � I L CPT1 /JJcPT1 4'' _.,../"' 4 I .. i � CpT1a-: VCT Vuu r,k s RIKZ' r t,. ., ` . LIN. © ,L Il� t 5,411 nip j \1 �, VCS' —WD TRIM 6CAP w / mi SURROUND W/ �/ WIDC L� ® KTCHN ®$: '.: .. le--. hr7"1CIV _....i (SOFFIT , TRY $ 6 c�� �L� jN Q/ a .(_ ���I \�; • ,S � oj�II 3. -1. 0PT2 4' -9• / 12' -1• IIY2• 1)' -1r 35'-Y 993 GROSS SF 928 NET SF 22 PORCH SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN LOPE TO DRAIN SCALE: 114•.1'-0' ROBE HOOK TOWEL RACK FULL WIDTH MIRROR T.P. DIS. \ ' 24 e• , —TOWEL RACK // ,—ROBE HOOK / /(-SHOWER ROD / *P'951$ /j , -TOwEL RACK )ffl,,I —FULL WIDTH• -4• /' MIc^ 0H/ LL FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. ROBE HOOK T.P. DIS. 40'- 1058 GROSS SF 990 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4•.1'-0' 23 5'_ -0. 3• 3' -11• 3' -C / 4' -9• MECH. MULL MTL RAKING HALF W'1,1JppLL PREBSU E TREATED 2X SLOPE TO DRAIN AWAY F M BLDG 9 BEDROOM1 PO Fl. GREAT ROOM. WE TOWEL RACK — TOWEL RACK ROBE HOOK SHOWER ROD FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. TOWEL RACK T.P. DIS. WD TRIM & CAP SURROUND W/ SOFFIT �� .ii l� ) KTCHN :Mic REF W/EX 1028 GROSS SF 958 NET SF 22 PORCH SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4•.1'-0' 'i-4 L, FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER I le PLANNER "HARTFORD x}xbtrn a!E tire: Egan Pre..1.71. MPt PP 1 Inby aN011 hot I94 plan. ap®Ikelbn mpenlebnnand IId I ma urdt4 am • dub IRepllbrol kpO3en un Me Ia. al 9N N nnemm. 4VSd N PNiee N91nnlNn 90. 1012 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 12100 SAGIETREE 042 MEN 'MIME, MN (932)-H612W FI3 osO4962201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN ISSUE: 5/3 /2005 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A3.1 ROBE HOOK - T.P. DIS. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK SHOWER ROD- FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. W1 S' -T• 2' t' -tdz s' -11• mot" -r P• —II$ -MEC MTL BEDROOM3 B DROOM2 C MEC 1. GRILL SALCONETTE STEP UT CL2 CPTL_ VCT ISLAND,/ MIC W /EX ROBE HOOK T.P. DIS. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK SHOWER ROD FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. .VCT -- WDTRIM & CAP '-SV',I, SURROUND W/ SOFFIT_ UTIL �; ENTRY I v , / II t,. IR. s - s CL1 1FJ 4 d CAW \ \` \`L ROBE HOOK \ \ -TOWEL RACK \ \ -FULL WIDTH \ MIRROR W/ \_ \ MED. CAB. -SHOWER ROD a• KTCHN REF 1270 GROSS SF 1190 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 28 PERCENTAGE= 46.67% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE. 1/4•.1'-0• • 9'— 1• -0• 12•_1• IIPIIIIIIIIIIPI - HALF WA s -1t '� L TREATED 2% .M BLDG. W1 MIN AWAY FR -1 MECH.L i20" Iit ti lig_ 6EDR01M, 1. , .. a B \r NI UR . -M2 ; BEDROOMI's 0'' CL2 CPT1 GREAT ROOM - ;t 0 CPT7 11 • CPT/ 111111n01.111 GE �k. VCT. .. V 9 j 4,, ..CPT1 L4 CL4,. .._ CPT1 VCT VCT ir'' " ` D ®ter \ .� 4RROUNDW/ \ _ . ISDS / SOFFIT . L w. �:, BATH1 A \UTIL-4. 9 S 1 / ENTRY REF DW u i\ rr�ii EZ:b / ROBE HOOK \� \L -TOWEL RACK -FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ , \ MED. CAB. ' \-T.P. DIS. - SHOWER ROD A' —,5• 4' -1• iT•_5• f 451' —G• 1250 GROSS SF 1170 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE 114• =1' -0• LOPE TO DRAIN ROBE HOOK T.P. DIS. --� TOWEL TOWEL RACK SHOWER ROD- FULL WIDTH MIRROR WI MED. CAB. TREATED 2X SLOPE TO DRAIN AWAY FROM BLDG. V BEDROOM1,. CPTI.. 5' CL2 GREAT ROOM" • ROBE HOOK T.P. DIS. TOWEL TOWEL RACK SHOWER FULL WIDTH --- MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. CPT1 VCT .T rV T WDTRIM &CAP Ittr 1r /. LSy t` SURROUND W/ t t SOFFIT 1./ANN ILLN■Lumszliemawk 11141111 I \ 11UTIL.- 513 i Lk ENTRY "-ROBE HOOK ` -TOWEL RACK \ '- FULL WIDTH \ MIRROR WI \ MED. CAB. - SHOWER ROD a• —5• 1286 GROSS SF 1199 NET SF 22 PORCH SF TOTAL UNITS= 7 PERCENTAGE= 11.67% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1I4•.1'-0" tY —I• 1. GRILL BALCONETTE BEDR0OM1 CPT1. 5E GREAT ROOM:, • VCT '-WD TRIM S. CAP 'RV SURROUND W/ SOFFIT ENTRY \ UTIL il�� s % / \ \11 ROBE HOOK \ , TOWEL RACK FULL WIDTH \ MIRROR W/ \.., \MED. CAB. T.P. DIS. - SHOWER ROD u'— 1255 GROSS SF 1175 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4•.1'-0" FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER 'HARTFORD rOROUVPNE ffe 121(0 ...ma BaSi101 bainO� M12.5117.201 1 1.51 wrR, 1111 M. plan, ptlfl8Sn co Ycdaprvl and Ian e duly Noidatored . kONes under M. Ion N M slat I HoSd N. Pkra 011. Rogillroken No. 1018 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 1210ELNGIETREE LANE E, MN (451}1561255 FAX (442 )-4561201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LA1W5, MN. ISSUE: 5/5/2005 REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A3.2 ISSUE: 5/5/20a5 L REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET • • RO AD AD T.P. CO SHC $HC AD TO ME( FU MI se.-- 144. 1 QV' is.-. n-7. 11..4- 2V-4i. • 4 - . • - . • e_o• 1..‘, r_,I.:". \ BALCON •2' =MECH. GRILL W.1lIll1l- 111111= lips•---- , STORAG . , .,.5li1 111 iilVilli 11 ■ '...- MECH. ' ' . =wow= OM lezi lliI '-,•-•.._ . .„. 4,$. C L2 ' ,, , -- -.,•:•-•_, _ --,? •- : • . r , ' . . GREAT ROOM . ■ ., .._. , : : __, , v -... . ...__ :._.. ROOM2 ' - - . •., I Ilitillilla■ 441 ki t . E=I ' -, pqill cm ill . / BATH 1.:'' -. .2, -- Vi;•'''. ki,' „ - - -. '9 ,ixt, • RAB , iS. RESS ER LI L RAC CAB. '4 , SEAT ,, • '''' . ' 1 I' WItr. !El '-' . UN 54 RE RES • LE . \ '•:, -',,•' '-/? ,, ENTRY KICH NI 17 i - Aio.,,,i,; S W/D ,k, I :": ,„ '-.- RESID •' RECYCLE • .-___ NCE , SVA El ' EiATH2-„ ---7-- MOP SINK LA : j \ , •=,' 0 , I 45.2 I,- W I dir.?? \ / ;C. / \ ---- JANITOR 'XI gj A 11111 VIEW ■I — , N..., / ..4 / 2.-.45: 5•-5,• 5 . \ ' \' r , • \ ACODAMFpORLED81sANISEEAT 8IIOWERLIP ROBE HO% , • 4 IP \ ', I-SHOWER ROD 7---"\\ 1377 GROSS SF 1277 NET SF '' \ TH -FULL WID as.,a)i. -TOWEL RACK PERCENTAGE= 5.00% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4,1,17 - T.P. DIS - ADA GRAB BARS FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB, ROBE HOOK T.P. DIS. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK ROBE HOOK SHOWER ROD FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB, TOWEL RACK T.P. DIS. TTE r a- 0. 3.-1r -MECH. GILL - MTL. RAILING r PRESSURE TREATED 2X / AWAY F OM BLDG. LIN Ark WO TRIM & CAP SaNiz'V sSOURFFRITOUND W/ ENTRY 117110-2.1-71 '111.11.11111 ii.HIQY wanmiTinv T 1289 GROSS SF 1189 NET SF 22 PORCH SF TOTAL UNITS= 4 PERCENTAGE= 6.67% SLOPE TO DRAT GREAT ROOM : 1 117.7-11; ; Vi CTCPT1 0 1'- W3 • 5/3 W3 w3 TOWEL RACK MED. CAB, ROBE HOOK FULL WIDTH MIRROR T.P. DIS. TOWEL RACK SHOWER ROD THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4•'-1,0' FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD . I -4 AGROtiP AVEtk-1 /1".',11frro, I b.* mall 1531 141, plan. apecIllealon nped 5050p344 by nu es war q lima xi:males and Ilaa I arn • duly lagtdand Ant. 005.0 0, 4113 00 bp *IN al Ninnosea 0,3154. Puce lispleratIon No. 10■42 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP .100 SINGLEFREE LANE EOEN MM., MN 052}746.1200 F0,7312)710-0201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA-05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL AUG CET': OF SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A3.3 2005 • • • 11 daim lIlIlilIlIlIlIl SE 11111111111III[11111111111 111 ME 11 = = = (M• ME IU 1 • IlIIJIIIUIII]II!fflI SR • IN AS NE 111 IfflhIII 111111111111 71 IIOIIIIIIIIll - •1 ■■ INE E EI 11 RU IU mairact_ Amur . 11 am MINIMM3111111 11111111L1-21Mil 11111111 rnD IIIIiIIItIIItJIIIuIIII u AUG C 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARnoiw 1770MPPerm S.M. 41V.77,6120i I lwrety mmus DDI Ws. plen, snorer:anon or rernr1 mrs frepored ny me or under In, dine sonamis. and RODE. .1Aect Linder Ow lows ftM Note of IdLnesoto, OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 12100 SINDLETREE UWE EDEN MAMIE, MN (992).74E4E0D FAX (.52)-796-1201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA-05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE V/LLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKF-S, MN. ISSUE: 13/5/2005 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: A5.1 • • • - H 11 111161111111111111 1111111 nID 11111111111111111111111111 us es Int ME •1 • IN ER MI pm IU 1,921VE srpagE siPays srpage i. E 111111I @11111111111 11111111111111111111 1 111;11111101111111 111111111_11111111 EE 0 = szwys S SI9X)19£ SWX,9E Romig BE 00 srPOISE 11111111 111111111R11 CY • II • 111111111111 I11111111 • 2.)., R1111111111 111111 1111111-1111111111Wm 1111111110101Ni 1111111111111111111 1 minnum IU 11111 - - - 0 0 0111111 11111E111111111 Eniummiroui 11111111111111111111111111111 11 11 MIN 9 Apt.,:cgittAkw9:5111: Z005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER 1-7 • HARTFORD .6, M,1547M-12■37 fteferfePereteoi Ifecetie certify MI th plan. sperr,otinn er retied ties pep,. or under my died supetrn and that pm p duly rticlifl•ct oder the eves of If. LtSt °051,41ion Pk. 101362 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 12100 S1NGLETPZE ONE EDEN P0.0.1PIE, MN (952)..74fr1200 FAX (952}740-12OA PROJECT PPOJECT NUMBER: MHFA-05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAMES, MN. ISSUE: 5/ .Z005 L. REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: A5.2 • SIggsfil GE 11• RU SigniAgE sIcw-AgE • • siggsrfigE srprAgE 111111 'TNE r_e,44u'; r4 u3 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER ■•■rr 4,HARTFORD I'446xott;;447Eihic7,44- I I 12:11.11171eree■gz. Ma IV p52.17,4.12. .174-17111 1 heret, certify that thb plan, speallentio, or meal was pepored hy roe or mder my 1dPect pupenipien and that 1 arr. a 41u iiegiptered Profiled toter the laws of the state A Plimeato. Horde IL Fiero Date Recietratto p0. 10862 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 1210o SINGLET. LemE MEN OW., 4444 052)41641M FAX(0S2)-74511201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA-05020 LA KEWOO DS APART M E NTS LEGACY AT WOO DS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN ISSUE: 5/5/2005 L. REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A6.1 L 7 LLL LJ 11M,NOINSINSIMIN AUG I 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD zLo No-ve1 1 baby 002y Mot II* opmalcolion er fee, 'ea ;mowed by me sr undo Ny &vat amnia. and 11,a1 1 ern a dub: Reiptared Archie mclar to Olole 1.(mrasoto. HSX 'ReOsTabon? No. 1282 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 22100 SINGLET. Ma WEN MIRA, MN (952)-795-1200 F/0((952)-7116-1201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA-08020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN. ISSUE: 1/5/20115 REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A6.2 ii LJ I HRJJL LLL LJ 11M,NOINSINSIMIN AUG I 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD zLo No-ve1 1 baby 002y Mot II* opmalcolion er fee, 'ea ;mowed by me sr undo Ny &vat amnia. and 11,a1 1 ern a dub: Reiptared Archie mclar to Olole 1.(mrasoto. HSX 'ReOsTabon? No. 1282 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 22100 SINGLET. Ma WEN MIRA, MN (952)-795-1200 F/0((952)-7116-1201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA-08020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN. ISSUE: 1/5/20115 REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A6.2 ii LJ IL LLL LJ 11M,NOINSINSIMIN AUG I 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD zLo No-ve1 1 baby 002y Mot II* opmalcolion er fee, 'ea ;mowed by me sr undo Ny &vat amnia. and 11,a1 1 ern a dub: Reiptared Archie mclar to Olole 1.(mrasoto. HSX 'ReOsTabon? No. 1282 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 22100 SINGLET. Ma WEN MIRA, MN (952)-795-1200 F/0((952)-7116-1201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA-08020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN. ISSUE: 1/5/20115 REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A6.2 ii L1±JL LLL LJ 11M,NOINSINSIMIN AUG I 2005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD zLo No-ve1 1 baby 002y Mot II* opmalcolion er fee, 'ea ;mowed by me sr undo Ny &vat amnia. and 11,a1 1 ern a dub: Reiptared Archie mclar to Olole 1.(mrasoto. HSX 'ReOsTabon? No. 1282 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 22100 SINGLET. Ma WEN MIRA, MN (952)-795-1200 F/0((952)-7116-1201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA-08020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MN. ISSUE: 1/5/20115 REV. THIS SHEET NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A6.2 1)705ATON NOTES 1) FOUNOA00 HAS BEEN 85001 0 AS SPREAD FOOTINGS IN REFERENCE TO SOUS REPORT D. 8 FOOTING DATED 10000OM(lO 2105 BY BRAUN INTERTEC- ANY UNSUITABLE SOIL BELOW FOOTING BEARING LOCATIONS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH STRUCTURAL FILL COMPACTED TO 055 STANDARD PROCTOR (REMOVE ANY SOL WITH ORGANIC MATERIALS SUCH AS TOP SOIL). EXCAVATE& TO BE OVER5EE0 1 FOOT FOR EACH FOOT W FILL SEE SOILS REPORT FOR RECOMMENDED DEPTH OF EXCAVATOR AND FILL momaAL5. 2) 08800 BEARING PRESSURE - 3000585, TC BE VERIFIED BY SOILS E000000. 5050450 FROST COVER W -01. 5 -0' AT ISOLATED EXTERIOR FOOTINGS. 3) SLAB -ON-C 44X BASE FILL TO BE GRANULAR MATE*. PLACED N MIN. 4' LAYER AND COMPACTED TO 955 STANDARD PROCTOR. EXISTING 5)B -GRADE TO BE OISCKE0 AND COMPACTED BITH A SHEEP300T ROLLER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY FILL _ STRUCTURAL FILL TO BE PLACED IN MAX 9' LIFTS AND COMPACTED 91TH A SELF - PROPELLED SHEEP300T ROLLER TO 957, STANDARD PROCTOR DRY OEN., 4) SOILS ENGINEER TO 00IR' SU8GRADE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION BEFORE POURING FOOTINGS. 5) USE FROST RESSTANT GRANULAR BAIXFILL AROUND PISS AND WALLS B) PROTECT EXCAVATIl4S @ ROMEO FOOTINGS FROM FROST PENETRATION AT ALL TIMES NO OONCRE10 TO BE PLACED ON FROZEN SOIL MCRFIF NOTES_ 1) EXCEPT AS 007FD, ALL CONCRETE WORN TO BE IN ACCORDANCE MM CURRENT AO 301 4PEOF1CA1915 FOR STRUCTURAL WORK FOR BULONXS, IBC 2000 ARO APPUCABLE RELATED STANDARDS CONCRETE MDD:S WALL BE DESIGNED PER ACI 301, U540 PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMING TO AS.1 C -150 OR C -595, AGGREGATE COFORMNG TO ASTM C-53 AND ADMIX URIM CONFORMING TO ASIM C -494, C -1017, C -618, C -989 AND C -250. 2) CONCRETE STRENGTH TO BE 300079 AT ED DAYS WM MAX. WATER CEMENT RATIO (VC) _ .50 FOR ALL CAST - &-PUCE COMPUTE EXCEPT GARAGE FLOOR SLAB TO BE 4000 F9 AT 36 0015 W1H 4405. W/C RATIO - .45 3) MAX. AGGREGATE SZE 3/4' FOR FTGS @ SLAB S/8' FOR MASONRY FILL 4) MAX SUMP: 4' EXCEPT 4 FOR MASO.* Flu. @ T FOR SLABS 5) AIR ENTRAINMENT: 4.5 -7.57, FOR GARAGE FLOOR AND EXPOSED WORK 8) SAWCUTS FOR GARAGE 5Lg3-ON -GRADE 91ALL BE 11 DEEP @ 1 /B' BIDE MAKE CUTS AS SOIARE SHAPED AS POSSIBLE 05174 A MAMMUM DIMENSION OF 30' (10' PREFERABLE). RACE SAWGUTS ABOVE PERIMETER OF FOOTING PADS. SUBMIT SAW CUT PLAN TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL CUTTING TO BE DONE NOT SOONER THEN 12 HWRS, AND NOT LATER THEN 24 HOURS AFTER SAAB POUR. CUTS TO BE FILLED WITH APPROVED BITUMINOUS =DPW * OR CAULKING. 7) CONCRETE MATERIALS. FORMING. PLACING FORM REMOVAL. ETC. TO ACI RECOMMENDATIONS AND ACCEPTABLE STANDARD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE 8) RENF0tCE0 CONCRETE HAS BEEN DE*GNED IN ACCORDANCE 48171 amen' ACI-318 AND IBC 2000 MTi APPUCABLE RELATED STANDARDS 9) PER MN BLOC. CODE 1003 SEC1ON 1907.7.5 IN THE PARKING GARAGES AND PARKING RAMPS THE REINFORCEMENT STEEL 15 TO HAVE A MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER OF 1 1/S. FOR TOP SURFACES AND 3/4' FOR BOTTOM SURFACES. ALL BONDED REINFORCEMENT SEE. LOCATED WITHIN THE DEPM OF THE SLAB MUST BE EPDXY COATED IN ,0NF0RMANC£ MTH THE APPLIPARIF STANDARDS REFERENCED N AO 318 -99 SECTORS 15.3.7 AND 3.5.3.8' EBERL E. MAY BE USED IN LIEU O WELDED CORE MESH IF USED PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTORS. ©- o- NG STEEL MOTES - GRACE )ALL (STIRRUPS . STEEL TO OT � A061µ5 08 04470 0515 GRRADE 40). T WELDING S RENFORONG STEEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS 01.4. ALL O 2) SHOP URAMNGS TO BE DETAILED IN ACCORDANCE BIM AO DETAILING MANUAL AND CURRENT ACT -315 'MANUAL FOR STANDARD PRACTICE FOR DETNUNG REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES. AND SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION. LAP STEEL 35 BM OAUETERS LINO ON ALL REINFORCING STEEL INDICATED AS BEING CONTINUOUS (CONS. 3) COVER TO REINFORCING UNG 3' UNDERSIDE 700340. CONCRETE CAST AGAINST @ PERMANENTLY EXPOSED TO EARTH 11 • TOP OF EXPOSED Sf APS. BARS EXPOSED TO EARTH CF WEATHER T )S' 0 =A NS @ BEAMS 3)' WALLS ELEVATED SLABS (0 101514) 1HAT ARE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER 4) ALL RE8PR TO BE HELD IN PLACE WITH PROPER ACCESSORIES SUPPUED BY THE RENFORONG STEEL SUPPLIER. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE SET AND TED IN PLACE PRIOR TO POURING OF CONCRETE. EXCEPT THAT VERTICAL 009EL5 FOR MASONRY WALL REINFORCING MAT BE 'FLOAT. N PLACE 5) All REBA5 FOR EXTERIOR STOOPS @ ENTRY SLABS TO BE EPDXY COATED. 5) ALL WELDED WERE FABRIC (MIT) SHALL CONFORM TO A5TM -155. BFNFRA1 NOTED 1) DESIGN LOADS: (IBC 2000) ( *NBC 2003) ROOF: SNOW - 54P3 GROUND SNOW LOAD PLUS BUIL7 -1W LOADS AS PER MNBC 03 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD - 15.SPSF FLOORSI51 fl LIVE LOAD_100PM 151 531 DEAD LOA0091P5F 0 S.PC PLANK 1ST FL MECH. @ MOVABLE PARTITION DEAD 01)*L AREA 2)D FL LIVE LL00=75PSF, 4055E • RE00. 187 L AREA NO FL MAD LOAD -9153 8 S.PC PLANK, 151185 O FN00 LIST 210 R MECH. @ MOVEABLE PARTITION LOAD -2553 3RD FL @ ABOVE: LIVE LOAO-40P3 30 FL @ ABOVE: DEAD LOA* 01555E 380 01. @ ABOVE MECH. @ MOVEABLE PARTITION LOAD -25PSF FO 00117 N WALLS: EGGVALENT FLUID PRESSURE 450 3 M 110 USE OF FREE DRAINING SANDS USED AS BACKEDL WIND LOADS 90 MPH WEND EXPOSURE El 2) STRUCTURAL DESIGN 0' 1715 BUIL3NG 15 IN ACCORDANCE MTH ME 2003 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING COOS • 2000 IBC. 3) VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATORS WIM ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS PRIOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER 6 ANY ORMOND DISCREPANCIES MMONATELV. 00 NOT SCA. DRAWINGS 4) 00 NOT BAIX LL AGAINST WALLS UNTIL 4AN FLOOR STRUCTURE AND BA1MENT SLAB ON GRADE IS N RAC£ 5) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE BRACING UNTIL BUILDING 15 CEO£➢ N. THE CONTRACTOR 0 RESPONSBLE FOR THE D800. SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF ALL BRACING. SNORING MO FORMWORK REOUIRE0. 55 rY u FOOTING Sc FOUNDATION PLAN IFVATION NOTES MN. FLOOR SLAB THICKNESS 4' OVER 5' COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL @ 671E POLY SEE ARCH DWGS FOR SLAB SLOPES AND FLOOR DRAMS ELEVATIONS TOP OF 9.08 0 END WALL XXXX' DARES ELSE9HERE SEE ARCH 0055) TOP 07 FOOTING E%X' 0NO TOP OF FOOTING 0 PRECAST OOS XXIP (CRY XX) 8 4 0 B 16 AUG FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD RO Z. 7:P= m585174 That 03 RMa. IPNfsa4On rtgrt was Plgnld 32 50 07 4 0 7 9x1 sgenvim and BM em R @1U IhgMed Strolled EWA? Olds the - al the We of Sao. On G R6 Ode 0SNd 11.E R5355aXOn 9047'81 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 1210057VGLETREE CONE EDEN FRAME, MN (95337461200 FAX(02):)4F12W PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE ]PAR LINO WOES, MN. SHEET TITLE: STRUCTURAL FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET NUMBER: S1.0 • 2•-- }{-- 12 : —Ir—I i '� ;h IR _ 1=1 1 0. g 1 1 ON Fi !,/y fl N I ,.._. � I 14' -11.-10.--L- 5' -8' -- I]' -9'+ -11' 18' 27' 1 b BS 271 19- - 1 b - -18' b (V� 55 rY u FOOTING Sc FOUNDATION PLAN IFVATION NOTES MN. FLOOR SLAB THICKNESS 4' OVER 5' COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL @ 671E POLY SEE ARCH DWGS FOR SLAB SLOPES AND FLOOR DRAMS ELEVATIONS TOP OF 9.08 0 END WALL XXXX' DARES ELSE9HERE SEE ARCH 0055) TOP 07 FOOTING E%X' 0NO TOP OF FOOTING 0 PRECAST OOS XXIP (CRY XX) 8 4 0 B 16 AUG FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD RO Z. 7:P= m585174 That 03 RMa. IPNfsa4On rtgrt was Plgnld 32 50 07 4 0 7 9x1 sgenvim and BM em R @1U IhgMed Strolled EWA? Olds the - al the We of Sao. On G R6 Ode 0SNd 11.E R5355aXOn 9047'81 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 1210057VGLETREE CONE EDEN FRAME, MN (95337461200 FAX(02):)4F12W PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE ]PAR LINO WOES, MN. SHEET TITLE: STRUCTURAL FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET NUMBER: S1.0 • ( A P • • • o NOTES 1) Y STRUCTURAL TOPPING OVER ALL PRECAST FLOOR PLANK. MASONRY Norms I) ALL MASONRY HAS BEEN DESGNED AND IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED M ACCORDANCE WITH IBC 2000 AND TIE APPLICABLE REFERENCED STANDARDS 3) Au CONCRETE BL000: TO CONFORM TO ANM C90 GRADE N. MIMMLM COMPRESS. STRENGTI 2000 PSL 3) ALL MORTAR TO BE TYPE 'M' WITH 4141104 O MPRE59NE 010011GTH - 2500 PS (210 SEE SPECS.). 4) MINIMAL MASONRY UNTEL TO BE R' 1101 U BLOCK 0/0 2 -15 BOTTOM AND CONCRETE FILL FOR OFFA4IS UP TO 4. -0' I/O. FOR LARGER OPENINGS NOT SHOWN, CONSULT THE ENGINEER UNTELS SHALL BE SHORED UNTIL 0U. HAS ACHIEVED 2/3 OF ITS DE9ON STRENGTH. FILL PRO BLOCK COBS FOR TKO COURSES EA. END OF LINNETS. 5) PROVIDE VERTICAL FYOSORCED CONCRETE CORES AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS AND HORIZONTAL OUR —O—WALL 501000RCNG AT 16' 0/C TO ALL BL00KWCRK ALL REINFORCED CORES TO BE CONCRETE FILLED W/ 1 —[5 POSITIONED 3 1/2' FROM INSIDE FACE 1 MALL RE HELD IN P05110N (PRIOR TO GROUTING) WTC WIRE P®1ONER5 SPACED AT 192 BAR DIAMETERS ( 10 MAK) MID AT RENFORCNG 9PUCE5. 5) PROVIDE VERDE, 005150. JEWS O MAX 00'—P 0/C SEE STRUC. 055551 S FOR LOCATIONS FILL CORE 6/ 1— TMEACH 502 OF CONTROL JOINT. KEY THE CONTROL JOINTS AND RUN MBAR BEAM BAR E CONTROL JOINT IY BEYOND WITH A MORTAR BOND BREAK ON 11E 12' LENGTH. 1) ALL MASONRY PILASTERS KK'MD0 0 ...DEEP ALONG THE 12' MASONRY WALL FOR A TOTAL OF XX. WIDE X XX' DEEP. 111.1 ALL CORES N PILASTER —WALL (1010 X 02') W/ 1 —RS. 5) PRO201 BONO BEAM (6' u10 0FP(H) AT TOP COURSE OF ALL MASONRY WALLS 4 UNDER ALL PRECAST, STEEL DEC( AND BAR ST. BEARNG W/ 2 -45. REFA1T CONCRETE NOTF0 I) ALL PRECAST CONCRETE WORK TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT 00 -301 AND PCI MANUAL DES. TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT A0.318 • IBC 2000. DE30 OF ALL PRECAST ELEMENTS BY PRECAST SUPPLIER. ENCNEER TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANT ®CAN REVISIONS REWIRED IN THE MESON STAGE. 2) SEE PLANS AND GENERAL NOTES FOR SUPERIMPOSED DE5ON LOADS. J REINFORONG AND CONNECTION 0 91085 TO BE SUBMITTED BT SUPPLIER FOR APPROVAL BY ENGINEER. PRECASIER TO SUPPLY NEOPRENE PADS FOR REAM BEARING AND KOROLATN FOR PLANK BEARING. 4) MINIMUM CONCRETE STRENGTH 4 5000P9 AT 26 DAYS. 5) PRECAST AIPPUER TO S901K MANN LATOUT ANO POUR STRIP LOCATIONS ON 91CP DRAWINGS PRECAST S.IPPLIER RESPONSIBLE FOR POUR STRIP 11 — SL NG PLANK 45600 INDICATED ON THERE DRAWINGS FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES ONLY — SUPPLIER RE9a0N519LE FOR PLANK 6) PRECAST RANK SUPPLER TO 01001 WITH ARD0TEC1URAL NEOIANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR OPENINGS LARGER THAN 11r X 10' AND ACCOMMODATE 04711 REINFORCING AS REWIRED. OTHER 9AALL HOLES MAY BE 0305 DRUID BY APPROPRIATE TRADE BUT NOT WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE PRECAST PLANK SUPPLIER. 7) PRECAST PLANKS TO BE ALIGNED WINO LEVELED BEFORE GROUTING THE IQY5 AND JOINTS WM 3-1 SAID CEMENT GROUT FROM THE TOP. B) PRECAST SUPPLIER TO DESIGN BASE PLATE O PRECAST COLUMN WHICH IS TO CONNECT TO 110 W/ FOUR 3/400 HILT HIT —ICE HAS ANCHOR BOLTS W/ MIN. EM0EOAENT OF 5 5/5' (USE NON51155 GROUT WITH A MIN 25 OAT STRENGTH OF 5000PS BETWEEN 5ASE PLATE AND FTC. PAC). PRECAST SUPPLER TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS BEARING THE 501 OF A REGISTERED ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL 9) GARAGE ROOF TO HAVE } HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. 10) ELEVATION OF TOP OF STRUCTURAL TOPPING OF FLOOR IS DOCK'. I/ 5' PC PLANK 6 PC PLANK b b b b b b b 66 b iD „ 1ST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 1/16' - P— D' E 4 0 8 ifi PRECAST COLUMN IB'SOUARE PRECAST BEAM 24'IW130 K 32'1101 L0 FOR REVIEW ONLY •IAT re., 44.• 44644444. ew.e.4..e ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 1711.14.1644 ,444. 44,00 II h4R0y 011iy Sot the WNn, eaa+Raa600 er rep)r® prep,. M me mwder aR dial N 5Il0t and BM(I am a day Regale 0 Std.! Eryveer UIEm the 1545 al Ow doe rt NebOta. Coy C. Reldold PE Re0900 n 65.015551 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 12100 SNGLET. LANE EDEN MAMIE, MN (952 ).T 61200 FAX(952 ).7461201 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TROLL LINO IMES, MN. SHEET TITLE: STRUCTURAL 1ST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN SHEET NUMBER 0 a2 • AGENDA ITEM V.E.4 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: September 14, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plat - Village No. 4 Hartford Development, Inc. BACKGROUND Hartford Development, Inc. has submitted the final plat for Village No. 4, which encompasses Outlots A, and E of Village No. 3. The submitted plat depicts 7 lots and three outlots. Block 1 will consist of four lots. Lot 1 is intended for the apartment/retail building, and Lot 4 is intended for the hotel (both buildings are a part of this agenda). Lot 2 and 3 (and Outlot A) are intended for future buildings. Block 2 will consist of three lots. Lot 1 is intended for the shared parking area, Lot 2 is intended for Betty's Pies, and lot 3 is intended for a future user. Two outlots are included that will also be for future uses. The title commitment for the property and final plat has been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the final plat for The Village No.4 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Final Plat submitted September 7, 2005. • • • • -- -- / / i z� vl / ea / f' .. e'er o�t`�'' \ �•9 o / / •o / / / /// `t5`\e___ _, V.68.�' 46ssi sDrainage and UUIt •\ / / / of \c,It 1 ../ de S. �` Easement �t / / 55 'g - o •• \ / / y WOy 1...T dp f // // / / / \� qp. •�i�, 1'', �j- \� d, \\ ■ / / / / MNDOr CI • 56 `7`caI' S: ii• 49A' - \ 60 \ / / Q / , 1 671 ,..l°"• '� \• \. T^' _ • • •`' - • \ ` .., In witness whereof said Legacy Holdings -LL LLC. a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by �.,, , v _ \ its proper officer this day of 200 / / / /4"°172.1r O !f." '1 sb.20 i 1 1 �1 3a (08 , - 11 `• I cr 1- THE vILL4CsE NO. 4 P. RECEIVED SEP 0 7 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 11, T31, R22 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Legacy Holdings -LL LLC, a Minnesota corporation. fee owner of the following described property situoted in the City of Lino Lakes, State of Minnesota, County of Anoka, to wit: Outlot A and Outlot E. THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County. Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as THE VILLAGE NO. 4 and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL LLC / , / - • . / /// :/ / / r / / , / / /-. / /-, / / /.;' / / - - - / Found 1/2' Iron Pipe -, /9808 / Right of Access,,^ fovorr of 35Wti' —i ne a / of N o1 n9 - - -_— / I t° e0 / / / -- via (5Ay98o E1/ �- // �- - - --- i )s / / / / / // :. /s,�° o e• Wi N7 R 66 - -i? le, 1 I :9. s.fis - - 8... 68 8p 34 1 I / s. a / 2� •00 6 1 I r ' , I 00 // ` /brL ry' a 1 W// I 1 / �,eN.Bry / 1 1 / wroor or. _..' ,t...1,6:, •I 1 1 I - I I 1 1 N8933'45 -W 176.38 ,,, �...Ct]rd.�jy•7Y ,W i 1 Chrd.BrS =543 °31'53' 1 ; ; y • • AGENDA ITEM V. F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: September 14, 2005 TOPIC: •PUBLIC HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek •General Concept Plan, Planned Unit Development BACKGROUND We have received an application from Village of Hardwood Creek, LLC, to amend the comprehensive plan. A public hearing is required for a comprehensive plan amendment. A comprehensive plan amendment requires a formal vote. The application also includes a general concept plan for a planned unit development. The concept plan review is informal and does not require a vote. The amendment to the comprehensive plan would involve a number of elements. The growth management policy, laid out in Ordinance No. 24 -04, was prepared to implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. The growth management policy requires that several issues be addressed if the City is to accommodate this application. This project application is the first one that requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan as directed by the growth management ordinance. Review of the relevant parts of the comprehensive plan resulted in recommendations to add or change several passages. This application does not include a planned unit development or preliminary plat. It does not include the detailed information normally part of such applications. Because of this, we cannot analyze the project to see if it would qualify for the exemptions to certain growth management limits as a conservation development. In additions, there are some limits from which we cannot grant exemptions. Therefore, a comprehensive plan amendment is needed to address growth issues as well as changing the land use designation for the site. The suggested text amendments to the comprehensive plan are indicated and appear in a separate font. The proposed land use map change is one of the attachments to the report. We anticipate that this application will require additional consideration beyond tonight's meeting, so a special meeting of the P & Z has been arranged for September 27 for further discussion. • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 2 ANALYSIS Site Summary: The site comprises 363 acres west of 35E and east of 20th Ave. (see Site Location map). The site has been used for agricultural purposes. There are two existing homes on the site, fronting 20th Ave. Two smaller properties comprising about seven acres form a rectangle along 20th Ave. and are not part of the site at this time. However, this seven acres should be included in the land use change and MUSA if the larger site is to be changed. The following table lists the land uses and zoning on the site. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Rural and Rural Business Reserve Site agriculture, residential Industrial, High- Density Residential, Medium - Density Residential North agriculture, residential Rural and Medium - Density Residential Rural and Rural Business Reserve South townhomes, vacant • Commercial (Lino Lakes) • Commercial and High- Density Residential (Centerville) Rural Business Reserve East 1 -35 E and agricultural 1 -35 E, Industrial Rural West agriculture, residential Low Density Sewered Resid., Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural Business Reserve The comprehensive plan guides the site for industrial, high- density residential, and medium- density residential uses. To the south of the site, 40 acres is in Centerville and is guided for high- density residential and commercial uses in the Centerville comprehensive plan. The site is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. The site is zoned Rural and Rural Business Reserve. Details of the proposed land use map and zoning map are attached. A number of small wetlands pepper the site, many of which have been farmed. Patches of trees exist around the perimeter of the site. A pipeline runs diagonally through the northeast corner of the site. Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Reserve: The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) is the area within which the City can extend sanitary sewer. Most cities simply map their MUSA. Lino Lakes has land within the mapped MUSA but also has a MUSA reserve. As part of the approval of the comprehensive plan in 2002, the City received additional MUSA reserve acres from the Metropolitan Council. The amount of MUSA reserve was based on the City's estimates of the need for residential and commercial /industrial development. There are only 90 acres remaining in reserve for Stage 1 (pre -2010) residential development and 68.5 acres for commercial /industrial development. • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 3 The development project site requires 363 acres of additional MUSA. The rectangular exception is about 7 acres, for a total of 370 acres. A request for 370 acres of new MUSA would be part of the amendment submitted to Metropolitan Council for review. Under state statute, every municipality in the Metropolitan Area must have a comprehensive plan, and must submit amendments to the Metropolitan Council for review. The Met Council compares the city's plan to the regional Development Framework, which includes plans for the individual systems over which the Met Council has jurisdiction. These include sanitary sewer treatment, regional open space, transportation, and airports. Control over MUSA is how the Met Council ensures its sewer treatment facility planning is not overburdened or underutilized. Underutilization is wasted capital improvement, and thus poor use of public funds. Growth Management, Number of Units: The growth policy establishes a target for the number of dwelling units that can be platted each year: 147. This works out to a total of 1029 units between 2003 and 2010 (147 x 7 years = 1029). There are 76 units available for year 2007, 147 for 2008, and 147 for 2009. The proposed development area is intended to accommodate 1200 to 1250 dwelling units over six years. This would exceed the 1029 total and the 147 per year. Comprehensive Plan Amendments The following lists the reasons why a comprehensive plan amendment would be needed: • The proposed land use plan map must be amended if the application is to be approved. The current designations are Industrial, Medium- Density, and High - Density Residential. This would be changed to guide the entire site for Mixed Use. • In addition, even though our comprehensive plan includes Mixed Use on the proposed land use map, there is no description of this land use category in the text of the document. This should be addressed by describing the intent of the Mixed Use category. • The amendment must include a request for 370 acres of MUSA for the Stage 1 growth area. • The growth management ordinance states that an amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth (units /year) would be exceeded (Section 2, 7.). It is unlikely that the master plan for this development could proceed within the limits of the target of 147 units per year. (The 1029 units for Stage 1 noted in Section 2, paragraph 5 of the growth policy, is based on 147 x 7 years.) • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 4 • The comprehensive plan includes a list of Growth Management Policies, which includes "Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory" (page 27). As stated above, this would not accommodate the anticipated development project. This statement should be reviewed to accommodate the potential advantages of master planning large areas. • The growth goals described in the comprehensive plan "assume an average of 147 new households annually through the year 2020" (page 63). This statement merits discussion. Text Amendment: "Mixed Use" Land Use Category The comprehensive plan Proposed Land Use Map includes twelve land use categories. The text in the Land Use Plan chapter of the document include discussion of nine of the categories. The three categories not discussed are Public /Semi - Public, Manufactured Home Park, and Mixed Use. The 35W interchange area of the Legacy at Woods Edge and the Marketplace developments are the largest areas guided Mixed Use. The other is the area northwest of the Hodgson/CR J intersection. The Mixed Use category should be described in the text of the comprehensive plan. • We recommend the following text be added to the comprehensive plan, at the end of the Land Use Plan chapter, on page 97: MIXED USE The Proposed Land Use Map designates several areas for "Mixed Use ". The Mixed Use designation is intended to accommodate development that includes a variety of land uses. This could be a development that integrates uses in the same building, such as residential units above commercial space. It also might include different uses in separate locations as elements of a larger development, as part of a master plan. While it is possible that an appropriate development project in a Mixed Use area could include only one type of land use, other land use designations are available for development with only one type of land use. Development in areas guided Mixed Use typically will take advantage of the flexibility available with the use of a planned unit development. The City does not require a PUD for development in a Mixed Use area. However, it is the preferred design tool because development that includes a variety of uses typically will pose challenges best addressed with the flexibility available with a PUD. Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use should be reserved for areas that have undergone significant environmental review. Commercial development typically will require more impervious surface than residential development, which raises stormwater management design • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 5 challenges. Traffic generation differs between different land uses. The Mixed Use land use designation envisions varied and uses, and recognizes the possibility of design challenges, including environmental impact issues. These can best be addressed with extensive environmental review. Amending the comprehensive plan to guide new areas for Mixed Use and development with these areas should be reserved for development that promotes clearly identified public purposes. Such purposes may include but are not limited to: a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially feasible without exceeding the target c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without exceeding the target d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without • exceeding the target • Development in areas guided Mixed Use must comply with the following performance standards: 1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding land uses in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition, landscaping, and site access. 2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and convenient traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access management design elements for access to arterial and collector roadways. 3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available. 4. All development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site planning, landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water management. Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect and improve water quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and other natural methods whenever feasible. 5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility, connections to residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of interaction among local businesses and between businesses and residents. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 6 6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically pleasing, high quality buildings and streetscapes. Village of Hardwood Creek The Village of Hardwood Creek development area is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This 360 -acre development site is to be developed with commercial and residential uses. The concept plan for the development includes 500,000 to 600,000 square feet of commercial space on 55 to 70 acres of the site. A variety of single family and multi - family residential development will include approximately 1200 to 1250 dwelling units. The net residential density is to be approximately 4.5 units per acre, when including all land not within the commercial area. The specifics of the development are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit development approach. This site is included in the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) environmental analysis. Development must comply with the mitigation plan that forms a part of the AUAR. This area was guided Mixed Use with an amendment to the comprehensive plan in 2005. Text Amendment: Planning District 6 The comprehensive plan breaks the city into planning districts. The Village of Hardwood Creek site is in Planning District 6. The PUD application will be compared to the recommendations listed for Planning District 6. However, some reference to this site and its Mixed Use designation is appropriate. • We recommend the following text be added to the comprehensive plan in the Planning District 6 section, on page 153: Village of Hardwood Creek The Village of Hardwood Creek development area is located 1/4 mile north of Main St., between I -35E and CSAH 21 (20th Ave.). This 360 -acre development site is guided Mixed Use and to be developed with commercial and residential uses. This site is described in the Mixed Use section of the Land Use Plan chapter. The specifics of the development are to be part of a master plan using a planned unit development approach. • • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 7 Text Amendment: The 147 Statement On Page 27 of Comprehensive Plan The comprehensive plan includes a great number of goals, policies, objectives, recommendations, and strategies. The Policy Plan chapter includes a list of growth management goals and policies. Policy number nine is: "Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory." The growth management ordinance, Ord. 24 -04, provides for amending the comprehensive plan if this target is to be exceeded: An amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth (units /year)...would be exceeded (Section 2, par. 7.). The amendment will include the description of the site in the Mixed Use section, as explained above. However, in order to avoid confusion, it would be advisable to amend the limiting statement itself to provide for the possibility of amendment described in the growth management ordinance. • We recommend the statement on page 27 of the comp plan should be amended to read as follows: 9. Limit residential growth to an average of 147 units per year, carrying a three year supply lot inventory. Specific projects that are found to fulfill specified public purposes can justify amending this comprehensive plan to exceed this limit. The City Council shall consider such an amendment only if the specific development project will promote a clearly identified public purpose. The public purpose may include but is not limited to: a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially feasible without exceeding the target c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without exceeding the target d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without exceeding the target These four public purpose examples are taken directly from the growth management ordinance. These are listed as potential reasons to justify an amendment of the comp plan if a project would exceed the annual growth target. Incorporating them into the comp Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 8 plan itself provides consistency between the comprehensive plan and the growth management policy ordinance. Text Review: Demographic Goals The "Local Forecasts" section of the Land Use Plan chapter includes the growth goals for the next decades: households, population, and employment. This statement is found on page 63: "The goals assume an average of 147 new households annually through the year 2020." This statement merits discussion. To amend this statement raises the question of amending the growth projections, an important part of planning the community's future. This will be extensively analyzed and discussed as part of the overall review of the comprehensive plan that must be completed by the end of year 2008. Conservation Development Issues Stormwater management methods, open space areas, connecting habitat and trail greenways are conservation development elements described in several policy documents. The Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan provides guidance. The draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) discusses such elements and will include a number of them in its mitigation plan. As an incentive, the growth management policy allows conservation development to be exempt from a number of the growth restrictions. The applicants originally intended the application to be a conservation development project. They are aware of the City's desire to encourage conservation design, and have been following the AUAR project. They also found the growth management incentives attractive. However, the exemptions from growth limits do not include the Stage 1 MUSA total, so a comp plan amendment would still be necessary. In addition, we need a great deal of information to classify a project as a conservation development in order to exempt it from the specified growth restrictions. Specific information would include such things as stormwater management designs, open space designs, long term stewardship plans for open space, etc. Such information typically would be included in a planned unit development /plat application. The current application for a comprehensive plan amendment does not include detailed information that would support exempting a "conservation development" from specified growth management limits. Even so, we support the developer's efforts to incorporate as many environmentally friendly elements as possible as the development design proceeds. The open space, • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 9 innovative stormwater management methods and attention to the long term management of these design features demonstrate good planning by the developer and are consistent with the City's environmental planning goals. Planned Unit Development General Concept Plan The developer's intent is to master plan the 363 acres for commercial and residential uses. The specifics are not finalized yet. As described in the zoning ordinance, the purpose of a PUD general concept plan is to provide an opportunity for the applicant to submit an application and plan to the City showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development. The concept plan provides an opportunity for the proposal to be publicly considered at an early stage. The following elements of the proposed general concept plan represent the immediately significant elements for review, as listed in the zoning ordinance. 1) Overall Maximum PUD Density Range. The application includes ranges of units and acreages. In Lino Lakes, density is calculated on the net area: simply by subtracting the wetlands from the gross site acreage. Some rough estimating, which includes open space and right of way data for the residential area only, leads to a residential density about 4.5 units per acre. 2) General Location of Major Streets and Pedestrian Ways. The concept plan includes the main collectors and access points envisioned in the draft AUAR (see attached Figure 21 -1 from AUAR).. A local north/south collector provides a route through the site. Two collector roads provide access to 20th Ave. on the west of the site. The north/south collector would continue south to access Main St., and north to future developments. The concept plan also shows an internal local circulation network providing access for the residential development areas. The AUAR recognizes the importance of managing access to major transportation infrastructure. Collector and arterial roads will not function well if new road intersections and driveways are allowed without an overall plan. The AUAR follows access management guidelines with '/2 mile spacing between full intersections on 20th Ave. The development site does not abut Main St. The pictured collector road would need to extend '/4 mile south of the site to access Main St. The Centerville /Lino Lakes border complicates the situation, as does the undetermined interchange design. The location of the access to Main St. is still under consideration. Main St. is challenging because of the I -35E interchange planning underway among Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Centerville, and MnDOT. The current front runner for the interchange design includes a typical diamond with one exception. In • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 10 the northwest quadrant of the interchange, the southbound exit ramp forms a new intersection and continues onto a new local road south of Main St. (see attached figure). This new local road would run between the existing 21st Ave. and I -35E. The new signalized intersection on Main St. would be only about 600 feet from 21St Ave. The latest plan is to convert the 21St Ave. intersection to limit turning movements and allow westbound Main St. traffic to flow freely from the exit ramp to 20th Ave. The 20th Ave. intersection will be signalized. All this means that the extension of 21St Ave. north of Main St. will not have full access. (There would be no south to east left turns back to the freeway.) There is not enough distance from 20th Ave. or from the new ramp intersection to allow a full intersection under access management guidelines. The road design does not need finalization as part of the comprehensive plan amendment approval. However, the road design must fulfill the traffic needs. A traffic study is underway to analyze this situation. 3) General Location and Extent of Public and Common Open Space. The concept plan includes an extensive open space network. The open space is to include stormwater management features, parkland, and trails combined into a large greenway system. Several branches of the county ditch system lay in such tiles crossing the site. However, many drain tiles that are not part of the ditch system were placed on the site over the years to drain the land for agriculture. Much of the potential for incorporating conservation development elements into the development lies with the stormwater management design. Utilizing infiltration to the greatest extent possible will be important, as will accommodating the flow currently carried by the numerous drain tiles. The Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan includes trail connections to be created on the site. The concept plan includes these and more to facilitate walking and biking within the site and to connect to trails outside the site. The greenway system would utilize the pipeline easement as part of the trail network. 4) General Location of Residential and Non - Residential Land Uses with Approximate Type and Intensities of Development. Single family and multi - family residential areas are shown on the concept plan. Housing will cover approximately 150 to 170 acres. Commercial uses in the southeast portion of the site will comprise 55 to 70 acres. The following table is taken from the concept plan. • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 11 Total 363 acres Commercial 500,000 to 600,000 sf 55 to 70 acres Residential Single family 400 to 420 units Multi - family 800 to 830 units 1200 to 1250 units 150 to 170 acres Open Space 80 to 95 acres Public Right of Way 55 acres 5) A Staging and Time Schedule of Development. The submittal includes a phasing plan. The site would develop from south to north, with over half the commercial development and some residential in phase one. Phase two would include the rest of the commercial area and a large amount of residential. Phases three and four would continue the residential development. The developer envisions full build out of the site over six years. 6) Other Special Criteria for Development. The AUAR has not yet been completed. Much of the project design will depend on the AUAR, particularly the mitigation plan. In addition, several roadway issues must be resolved. These include the design of the I -35E interchange and the final design for the intersection at 21st Ave. and Main St. Timing will be another important aspect of this development. Transportation infrastructure is needed to support a development of this size. In addition, improvements to the water and sanitary sewer infrastructure will be needed to support full build out of the project. The extent and timing of site development will rely heavily upon these issues. The City Engineer's memo is attached. What can be seen in the concept plan is an extensive open space /greenway network. This will provide for trail connections, stormwater treatment, buffereing from the freeway, and the potential for wildlife habitat. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board discussed the application on August 31. Because this is not an actual plat application with specifics, the Board's recommendation is general: "The Environmental Board supports the general environmental direction of the Village of Hardwood Creek, realizing that there is a lot more to be done." Comprehensive Plan Amendment Village of Hardwood Creek page 12 RECOMMENDATION • Open the public hearing, take comments, and continue the public hearing to the special meeting on Tuesday, September 27`h • Board discussion of the comprehensive plan amendments and concept plan. • Direction to staff. • • • • • Site Location • • LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RURAL MED. LOW ft DENSITY RESID SEWERED RESID. LOW DENSITY UNSEWERED RESID. LOW DENSITY SEWERED RESID. so • • • • a t • 'II • • • • I. • 1 a • • IN t • & • si INDUSTRIAL . • se.a.VV, 1 • i • • • • PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RURAL LOW RESID. DENSITY SEWERED RESID. MED. LOW DENSITY UNSEWERED RESID. LOW DENSITY SEWERED RESID. • • • ZONING MAP DETAIL • • • AUAR Figure 21 -1: Existing and Proposed Transportation Network iaie Editing and Praponed itreprtir, ayalam Cnrec tinatize Lseu tries A SITE Figure 21 -1. Existing and Proposed Transportation. Network • • I-35E at Anoka CSAH 14 :-iterchange Concepts 1-35E 4G ft. 44. Prepared by SRF April 29, 2005 CONCEPT 2 Diamond plus northwest loop TKDA •NGINEERS. ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292-0083 fax www.tkda.c.om. To: Mr. Jim Studenski, P. E. Reference: Concept Review Copies To: Village of Hardwood Creek City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Proj. No.: 13265.002 From: Thomas Prew, P. E. / Routing: Date: September 1, 2005 Received were the Comprehensive Plan Amendment aApplication and PUD Concept Plan for this project. This included existing topography maps, geotechnical report, and projected sewer flows. Sanitary Sewer System Impacts The City's Comprehensive Plan and the AUAR show that the sanitary sewer to serve this area will come 40 from the existing MCES Interceptor on 21st Street. An upgrade of Lift Station No. 8 will be required to serve this Development. Projected sewer flows from this Development are within the range expected for it in the AUAR • Water System Improvements The Comprehensive Water Plan shows that a 16 -inch watermain will be needed to extend from the north end to the south end of the project area. Well No. 6 will be needed before this Development is completed. This project is scheduled for 2008 in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. That schedule will be adequate to meet the needs of the City. Streets The AUAR calls for the 35E Frontage Road to be constructed through this property. The Concept Plan shows this roadway being built. However, the first portion of the frontage road alignment is not within this development, and will need to be worked out with the abutting property owners, and the City of Centerville. Connecting roads to 20th Avenue are shown on the Concept Plan in accordance with the AUAR. This Development is south of the proposed Northerly By -Pass on 80th Street. This Project will not impact the corridor for that project. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Concept Review Page 2 September 1, 2005 Village of Hardwood Creek ity of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Drainage Surface water drainage facilities are not shown with this Concept Plan. The Developer will need to follow Rice Creek Watershed and City of Lino Lake rules for surface water management. There are two County draintile ditches that cross the site. The dDeveloper will need to make provisions to maintain the capacity of these waterways. A permit will be necessary for any alteration of the draintile system. • • • • • WlTage oaf-Ward-wood Creek Lino Lakes, Minnesota APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PUD GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN September 7, 2005 Prepared By: ittgL rr:n41 LANDFORM MINNEAPOLIS• PHOENIX • LANDFORM Village of Hardwood Creek September 7, 2005 INTRODUCTION Village at Hardwood Creek is a master - planned, mixed -use development offering an approach to life- cycle housing and destination retail that is unique in this community. The project is planned as a conservation development to preserve the existing resources of the site. The property is located east of County Road 21 (20th Avenue), north of County Road 14 and west of I -35E. Our proposal would allow development of a unique community on 362 -acres that will allow convenient pedestrian access from the new homes to the retail center, which is planned to include several restaurants and other service retail. The retail element of the plan would provide destination retail that is still convenient and walkable for neighborhood residents. The mixed -use development would include residential near the commercial so that residents could easily walk to pick up the paper and a morning cup of coffee or enjoy a leisurely stroll to dinner at one of the many restaurants. The City is currently completing the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for approximately 4,500 acres in the northeast portion of the City of Lino Lakes. The project site is included in the AUAR area. We have reviewed the AUAR and believe the proposed project is well within the limits of the AUAR scope. The City is expected to approve the AUAR later this month. PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT The City Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinances require that mixed -use developments such as this be rezoned to PUD. Therefore, we plan to request approval of a rezoning to PUD, PUD Development Plan and Preliminary Plan following approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and review of the PUD Concept Plan. The PUD would allow a mix of retail and residential uses. The Zoning Ordinance states that the purpose of the PUD is to provide "for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional ... piecemeal ... development ". The development team has held open houses and neighborhood meetings to engage the residents in the planning process. We have gotten good feedback that we intend to integrate into the plan, such as: a desire to reflect the community's agricultural heritage through the landscape and architectural design of the project; a desire to provide pedestrian connections with trails and sidewalks; a desire to preserve natural areas within the site; etc. As we continue to refine the site plan, we intend to incorporate these elements to create a unique development. Page 1 • LANDFORM Village of Hardwood Creek September 7, 2005 Mix of Uses Our concept plan includes 55 -70 acres of commercial development, which will result in approximately 500,000- 600,000 square feet of retail space. We anticipate a variety of users with a mix similar to The Village of Blaine development, however, that development is smaller than our proposed development with approximately 495,000 square feet of retail. City residents have indicated a desire to have retail shopping choices on the site. Currently, residents are required to travel a significant distance for shopping needs. Residents have also commented that with the growth in surrounding communities, the area demands additional retail stores and they prefer to capture the tax benefits from retail development within the City rather than seeing it go to the neighboring communities. Our plan also includes a mix of residential homes that provide lifecycle housing opportunities for the community. The plan includes approximately 400 -420 single family homes and 800 -830 multifamily homes on approximately 150 -170 acres (270 acres including open space). This mix of housing would allow development at approximately 4.5 units per acre, which would be less than the density currently anticipated in areas of the site that are currently guided medium and high density residential and would be less than the densities anticipated in the City's AUAR. As we move forward through the development process, we will work with the City to finalize the design and bring forward a unique development that provides needed retail and housing options in the City. Parks, Trails and Open Space The concept plan also shows 80 -95 acres permanent open space. This and is in addition to the landscaped areas within the public street right -of -way and will include a mix of natural habitat corridors, neighborhood recreation and trail corridors consistent with the City's Conservation Subdivision Design. We will: • Preserve natural habitat areas unique to Lino Lakes • Create open spaces for passive and active recreation uses • Create well- designed neighborhoods that feature common open space and • Establish a unified landscape amenity for the enjoyment of residents We are proposing dedication of approximately 5 -6 acres of public park in the west central portion of the site for use as an active City park with play equipment and picnic areas. Additionally, we are proposing numerous private open space /recreational spaces in the neighborhoods. The private recreational space may include small neighborhood parks, tot -lots, passive open space and trail corridors. Sidewalks on the main streets allow convenient connections to the trails within the project neighborhoods and, ultimately, to the regional trail system. Page 2 • • LANDFORM Village of Hardwood Creek MIXX6.lOLII•.XO[Xlx September 7, 2005 Landscaping The project team is working to create an integrated landscape theme throughout the project, including plantings, lighting, streetscape and open space design. The main entrances to the site are planned as boulevard streets with landscaped medians. The entrances to the development will have significant landscaping and a development identification sign to create a unique entry feature. Our landscape concept will emphasize streetscaping to create a welcoming entrance into the main development and individual neighborhoods within Village of Hardwood Creek. The landscape concept emphasizes significant water features, natural plantings in the open spaces and more formal plantings within the development. The plan emphasizes street plantings, but will also provide extensive landscaping throughout the development. The plan will incorporate native plant material wherever possible. Streets/Access The neighborhood has been planned with a street connection to the north to allow for future access to that property via a new north -south collector road. The will have two accesses from County Road 21, but the main access is planned via the new north - south collector road with an intersection at County Road 14. Successful commercial development projects require direct access via a frontage road close to high traffic roadways. The site has excellent visibility from 1 -35E, which is the highest traffic road nearest the property, and direct access to the frontage road closest to I -35E will be important. While the subject property does not extend south to County Road 14, we have a general access easement from the adjacent properties and we are working with the landowners to the south to try to establish the street connection. Final site plan design cannot be completed until the access location to the south is finalized. Covenants /Association Documents Except for the public park proposed in the west - central portion of the site, all open space will be owned and maintained by an association. Village of Hardwood Creek will have a master association that will maintain the shared common areas. Within the master association there will be a number of sub - associations: the commercial association will maintain the common areas within the commercial portion of the site and homeowners associations will be created for individual neighborhoods to maintain the common space with their neighborhoods. Page 3 • • AL LANDFORM Village of Hardwood Creek September 7, 2005 The developer is preparing covenants and homeowners association documents that will be provided to the city for their review prior to final plat. These documents will address building materials, fences, retaining walls, pond maintenance, landscaping maintenance and other association issues. We have provided a draft of the master association document to give some idea of the intent of the document. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS We are requesting approval of three comprehensive plan amendments to allow development of the site as proposed. In order to allow this unique development, the city must approve amendments to the land use guide plan, growth area 1 MUSA allocation and growth management plan. The requested amendments are discussed below. Land Use Guide Plan Amendment We are requesting approval of a reguiding from Industrial, Medium Density Residential and High Density Residential to Mixed Use to allow development of this 362 -acre site as an integrated, master - planned community. We anticipate approximately 55 -70 acres of commercial in the southeast portion of the site and a mix of single family and multifamily within the remaining portion of the site. We expect to incorporate 80 -95 acres of open space within the site as well. The comprehensive plan designates the majority of this site as industrial with medium and high density residential adjacent to County Road 21. The requested reguiding to mixed use would allow use to develop the property as a Planned Unit Development with integrated commercial and residential land uses. Discussions and feedback from residents at open houses and neighborhood meetings support this change to allow this master planned community. Furthermore, Maxfield Research completed a market study that analyzed growth trends and market potential. This study also supports the concept of a commercial and residential mix on this site. We believe that a mix of retail commercial and residential is a better land use for this site because it responds to market demand and provides a better transition from this site to the existing residential neighborhoods. We respectfully request approval of the reguiding, based on the finding that reguiding: • Would comply with the spirit and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan, • Would comply with the mitigation provisions of the City's AUAR, • Would allow development of this vacant site, • Would provide increased taxes for the City • Would provide life -cycle housing opportunities for Lino Lakes residents, Page 4 • x741 attL LANDFORM Village of Hardwood Creek MINNFAPOLIF INOFNIZ September 7, 2005 • Would provide destination retail to serve the neighborhood and the greater Lino Lakes community and • Would allow development of the master - planned, mixed -use Village of Hardwood Creek as proposed. Growth Area 1 MUSA Allocation The property is currently located outside of the MUSA (Metropolitan Urban Service Area), but is located in Growth Area 1, which is planned to be added to the MUSA between 1998 -2010. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates development will occur in Growth Area 1, prior to 2010. However, the Growth Area I includes more land than has MUSA acres allocated to the area, therefore, we are requesting an allocation of MUSA reserve acreage to allow development of a mixed use, master planned community on this 362 -acre site. Municipal utilities are available and do have adequate capacity to serve this site. Furthermore, bringing this site into the MUSA to allow for this master - planned development will also provide opportunities to improve the streets in this area by creating a local street system in this development with a north -south collector that could provide an alternative to County Road 21. We request approval of the MUSA extension based on the findings that: • The change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, • Development of the site is anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan, • Adequate infrastructure is available to serve the site and • The amendment will allow development of a unique, master - planned community. Growth Management Policy The City's Growth Management Policy generally limits new housing to an average of 147 units per year through 2020 while carrying a 3 -year inventory. The 362 -acre site would include all of the MUSA residential acreage and units planned by the City for development prior to 2010, but the Comprehensive Plan does allow for comprehensive plan amendments for master - planned communities such as this. The proposal would require a comprehensive plan amendment to allow the mixed -use development to exceed the annual residential unit limit, the annual residential acreage limit and the 2010 MUSA acreage limits. In exchange for this flexibility from the growth management limits, the developer is proposing an exceptional project to meet the retail and residential needs of eastern Lino Lakes. The proposed development provides a comprehensive approach to land planning a significant piece of land in the city rather than allowing the piecemeal development that the growth management limits could cause. With a Page 5 • LANDFORM Village of Hardwood Creek September 7, 2005 master - planned community like ours, the neighborhoods are integrated and connected, large amounts of open space are preserved, and the scale of the development allows for streetscaping and other amenities that simply would not be possible outside of a master - planned community like Village of Hardwood Creek. The project allows the opportunity for great residential neighborhoods that are connected to a vibrant commercial area with green corridors and pedestrian connections. It is our intention to develop the site as a conservation development with 20 -26 percent permanent open space plus landscaped medians and boulevards on the main streets, but we cannot begin work on the detailed planning prior to approval of the requested comprehensive plan amendments. Therefore, while we believe our conservation development would meet the purpose and intent of the ordinance, we are asking the city to respond to this policy question now to ensure that our development proposal has the City's support before we proceed with the site plan details. Despite the City's Growth Management Policy, the City has continued to be impacted by the growth of the surrounding communities through increased traffic. Our master planned development will provide alternative roadways and relief from the existing thoroughfares. The City always has the discretion to approve housing units and acreage above the annual limit where the development proposal results in significant and discernable public values. The proposed development complies with the growth management criteria. Specifically: • We are proposing to provide a variety of housing types in this mixed -use development, which will help to meet the City's housing goals. Centex Homes will be the primary builder, but a number of custom home lots will be reserved for local builders. • The project will include transportation improvements that will benefit surrounding residents and which could not otherwise be accomplished through traditional, piecemeal development. • The concept plan shows 20 -26 percent of the development to be preserved as permanent open space, which will help to preserve natural features. • The retail and multi - family portions of the development will provide significant tax base for the City of Lino Lakes. • The public improvements planned with the site will have regional benefits for the community. • The development of this site as an integrated neighborhood with destination retail provides a unique opportunity for the City of Lino Lakes. • Village of Hardwood Creek will have an extensive system of sidewalks and trails that will provide access to and within the development. • Innovative stormwater design will also be used within the development, where feasible, Page 6 • • • ottL LANDFORM Village of Hardwood Creek September 7, 2005 Unfortunately, the exceptional design of this project and a commercial development of this scale cannot happen without the residential portion of the development. If the development is subject to the existing City growth limits, the opportunities presented by this site will be lost. We request approval of an exemption from the City's growth management restrictions to allow development of this mixed -use, master - planned community over a period of approximately 5 years. SCHEDULE Assuming the AUAR is approved by the City Council this month, we request approval of this Comprehensive Plan Amendment and PUD concept plan. Following approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, we would submit application for approval of a rezoning to PUD, PUD development plan and preliminary plat. We would then submit for final plat and final PUD development plan approval in the spring and begin site grading in the spring of 2006. At this time, the developer anticipates 4 phases of Village of Hardwood Creek, but the final phasing plan is dependent on a number of factors including the final site plan and market conditions. The phasing of the project will general move south to north and we anticipate residential build -out over 4 -6 years and commercial build -out within 5 years. SUMMARY We are requesting approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments and PUD General Concept Plan to allow development of the Village of Hardwood Creek as a mixed -use development providing a variety of residential housing opportunities and retail commercial. Any additional questions in regards to this development can be directed to Kendra Lindahl with Landform at klindahl(a�landformmsp.com or 612.638.0225 or Greg Hayes with Village of Hardwood Creek, LLC at ghaves(a�shingobee.com or 763.479.5636. Page 7 • • otIL LANDFORM Village of Hardwood Creek September 7, 2005 vidage of.7farclwood Creek I�eveCopment Team Master Developer: Village of Hardwood Creek, LLC 669 North Medina Street PO Box 8 Loretto, MN 55357 -0008 Commercial Developer: Greg Hayes Shingobee Builders, Inc. 669 North Medina Street PO Box 8 Loretto, MN 55357 -0008 Residential Developer: Bill Anner Centex Homes 12400 Whitewater Drive, Suite Minnetonka, MN 55343 Landscape Architect: Ben Sporer, RLA Landform 510 First Avenue North, Suite 650 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Project Architect: Jack Amdahl, AIA KKE 300 First Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55401 Project Engineer and Land Surveyor: William McCully Glenn Rehbein Companies 8651 Naples Street NE 120 Blaine, MN 55449 Project Planner: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform 510 First Avenue North, Suite 650 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Project Attorney: Mark Vargo 8651 Naples Street NE Blaine, MN 55449 Project PID# s: 13- 31 -22 -31- 0001,13- 31- 22 -23- 0002,13- 31- 22 -23- 0001,13- 31- 22 -21- 0002,13- 31 -22 -21 -0001, 13- 31 -22 -31- 0002,13- 31- 22 -34- 0001,12- 31- 22 -34- 0002,12- 31- 22 -33- 0004,12 -31 -22-43 -0001, 13- 31- 22 -33- 0001,13- 31 -22 -32 -0001 Page 8 VILLAGE AT HARDWOOD CREEK BOUNDARY AND TOPO SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIFFION OF SUBJECT PROP Ettrry (111Y" r •AAT, i 1 4,• ill FM.... j ,, ,,,, ,,, ,,,,I,,, .. , , , \.„ , ! 0 ..,,,,• , •• - ' h _., s. -•,, , , , , • , 1 s , .‘,„ •• , , ,, c , il • '..,.x A v ' FaT.Itrel.1t"w,. ..ri i .` i 1 ' -. s: Al>: ,.....4., ,, pt. v , i .„,,, <-„, „ ,... '..11i0 EXCEPTION ..- ;:'-'• / r , ... .... ,„, ..`• „,.• ,,." , / / ...,,, 10 ‘'i \ , .S...0.• , i ` ' 1 <./ -1, '` , \ • , S`.*'''.*''' .21,;' '' ' . ' r e / •``'.... ' /,,, /1 ' ; j \I I tk‘ \ \\ ,,, '‘‘ t. \ ‘ I I I 1 I \ \ '' f '-' '' ' • 1111 gl. i I 1 I., Hlt ..,...,\ ‘1,i1 -1 "•:„.":----.-.../•"/ 1 it li )1\ 3 / i r.o..// .*'• , ‘ •", \ "1 d.,,,..... •••••• , 5 / j • • • IIIII 1 . 1 . • ' '• •' 1 ST 14 r ' 1 1 3 ' '• •••St/.15 SS \ ' . 11 / 1// S117 56 WS), jos nnnaio\'‘,..10,„ t \ ', ‘ 1.. "....... "... „ i y,■. i'\\ C 5 ; , 1 4 os/.221,7. \,. , \\:•:, , \. „a. 1‘,/ ) i10.143, 7,t 1 1111::,I .: ZS •••• Ii \ •-•'••••"".••::::: \ ‘. ■ --- **•-• •-•( / // 'I • ij ' 1 / 1, i, , , . ,. \ ' ... 3 •-1.;..•,•,....,(...,,! ;6.5 31 2V,SSSEI ; \ '' ' "$2.212- *s..';\' --( ,' ' di /1 Il I %), , ,' - "", \ / / , • ,- ' .• 111.r, \\ ! I / ; F;'5 ‘. / i I ' i 1 i '' If • , II.. ...II • • .... .... trKr li, r 1 ••■ \ \ \ ‘, \ .""',47rd ;OVA. t- i ' / I / I!' , , . i, - •__• - - I 1 , iko s- '0\c\ /14'9\ \ • ' r 1 , : 1 . ,.:),' i., • , ...„ ., 4 ..., --- u•11•• \ , ..... ••-•••,-,i,.........) / 4 , ' I k \ ''''-'-' gsfr..i ) t 1 k,\ ,v,,,,• ...5.7 pore41,‘ ..- , , , , , ---.':‘, -\ , , , :, , , , , „it . ; ,..„... . \ • 1 i • , i. „d. "II, •.'. ' \ I, ,, A \ ‘. ') ' i ' 1 • *‘% \;1 Inth. 2. f ‘ ‘ 1", ? ■4 ..,... \...., qi 61 i i' 1 f'llgtie.: •, 1 ,,/ /L....a-L. , 47.31.,... ,,,,........ d.!‘ 1..k , - •,. ‘, ' ‘,..., Vi. 1 \ ....j..1.. . ,.......... 1/ ) ,, I I 1 ........,.... so.■. ' l i 1 IA: ,,‘..‘„\, , 1 ‘ \ \ ,l. III' •IL Is. ...T.A;...,‹ ..1....,..„.., /4 I 1 I ,„ ,' / / St-te I \ '"" - - - \ 1 i ' I c..,\‘‘' s'‘ / , \ ' ‘,.. " -,,„ \!\,, rgiii's 7-'7.0'h1641:::"1—? 4..iis4 , i / I "", \ f, • I Il / / r 4f 1 L \ \,‘""----""'"••••• j ( „I ‘3,.•. " \ / - \ ‘, • •`. „, , ,- *••• E ' / ed ,.„ 1 / / .. la 1 1..' 1;1!t.,. ‘t,...rs /1 !'' 40"16, • ., \ '1 I i 1; tr,1/4,,,f.., 10., ,...., ..... , .,,.';!/-40---'"...„-' „,` t ii) 11 ill Ji rli //•s. -.---7•E'.1%. i \ ; 1 '"."':... ` '''''' ‘ '''). '‘ . 1 \ k , c to.t.,014--...-, ' .W4R " .,'.1 - "",11.; ,. 1, " •‘ \ t ...- .... . .•!, '... „ !!! ....!!!'*f .-rtei.-.t i 1 ' i f r" ' ' ----- - ,'- ' - .-J -' - 0 '...-,' \ ...:--...-,.-, . „‘, 1 :„.,,.... '., \\.,,,-;\:,) , I 1 \ - i,:-. 1111 4q • •. i•- .. . • ‘ ‘1 , , t■re.., . ::: :,......,,s, .........,...,\0. // I 1/4 1 ' \ \ '''''''..'''''''. '.'''::4‘ N ‘ ,,, ,.., . , , , .‘ ... ..,,. ,,,,, :,,, tll111‘! VA Me . 1' .r...g, .. . , ... „- ro 1 - 1 — r4" ....s. - ,- ,,.. ,, - ':.)._ :-, -. - , \ \ ,.."k '' ," 1 / r i '', , ' v ....- ..- -- ..' ..,,` \ ..,‘. < •,,,,,,q,',- ,;;;,.., ' \ \ , I y ,if y „......- ' \ ...- ,„ r- -,,, , ,,,,, „„ ,.. , k,,s.--....,440t96,1 ..."‘” \ 3. \ N27 378.1.(4,TZ \ \ \ i. t -- — -Ging.) -... :,„,,,,.. g Ntsig ! `'" ,,. \ rt"'. . ( . 1 .tii III , O.,. -,iZt (4 !, . ,,.. , , / ..., -!,- ...... 4,,,, \ ' - — ;I 1 / ' ` ''', \ . A t, -• , 1, \ , , ,t‘ , l, 1\\icsohisroatte- stpt,T1 ituP: f,.4 ,r i.1:1 , 6 ,e( ■ • / ' , r, , , ' \ , \ s y I / , ■ , ll4: --- \'' // sa,, l''' ) 1 r ) ) r. C 1 i y i ...... f,,, \\\,.S. i .!..:47....!i. i , , , , , , N5 1 ) 1 1 / i / ' „.....„ ,. • tO );";',A1 1 I,, 0'61.'4 • i 1 i / 1 ...... i .t=CZ th -3l0 I '41i • 0 i, , .; ' 1i` , ■ ' ; 1 ' ' . ! itl !-5tlig'i 14 t ' .. ! , .... ... . - r ' / ..' .. . •.. / • _ - ; I ,„ " t ' / — ',, \ I .• k •. . ' ... .t N s1 .1 ' \ h,, , 4i /, 1 , ' • / / - ., / . ''-. .. .. / " ' ••\ • ,-, ,I5, , 5 • . ., . ..1 ., , • '..... .. . .„.. . .-.. •''•' . ••" . , 'I ' " . •/ n!, / ' -- ,r , • t • / / 1/4 ' I / - ' I, \ , . / , / •, ' . ' \ 1i , •/ , ••• , / •, '\ „ ) • . . , ' •,,'-\ •,.• 4,\ : r e . 1 5"' t , ./ / ... .„ , • '' t r ' ; ' i / r , , '.— .‘/ I , .. . . — , • ) / , 1 , /I i .- , s.l ., . ', . . ,, . ,e 5 . .,, , . .I i ,i ) 1 i .! : . 4 . • •-''- , '- , - ' '‘ 1 •, • ‘ 1 1 - t . i . . , ,•t ,.i . I ' .L ,, ' T ',, ' .„ .7 ; o. , , . ,p- 4, t, I1 M1 IN R. • M/ t• ) ' \ . ,\ . 5 ., A. -' A • .-.•) ,. r-1/4 , ; „1 \1 „ 2 x , \ \ ,,,x'. 4's ‘ , ',, I ., t I A - ,1 1 „ l I, .: 11 ■ , 1 1 4 1 : .• 5 ' 1 , I / / 1 sg7 A \ \ I l\1,.•A' I,. .'0-,.i3), i• „1' ' l,., f l..'' 1Il• . i 1li4 , ; t,11' 1 1l'; li1`. ' , IIT l•.1:Y 1't1llil,•L0 /,''.,',.i' 111 i1.1iti 1 i, I. ! y ; ! , 4tf'IL , r i ., oni3 \ , 1 .. i , \ , \ / , 1 /0) 1 , . \ , 1 I 1 1 - - - , r 1 k V , , , , / , n0 A l/ i „' -- - " ' , 1 " \ / cOiI LSO„ I • , , \ . > 1 , , k 1 ''' \ / , ' " ” \ • / ' ' 1/ .; -.. , i 1 o14>t4< _-.,L.-.`;, .,.1, ‘” ". r .I 1 1" ■ , , ) . ,! t 1Lc 1 . . • \ / - / / ( , (— 1 f I g . .1 I / ” ,_ / \ '/ k—\ ‘ - I fI i .,# ,,d. ,:•••• / , '•1* / ( .1 \ / ,• \ \ \ \ ‘' / i .".---•••••,, ••• ,■‘'‘.`-• '1,1 0 r .)3•, /./1 1;11' / • L' •••••'" d:/,,`.›•*"d• ,/,,,e3;1,5;*,/ ',..d/e/•• ,"•••*• / •••• \ H•Cri06.5‘ \ '•• •/•/•• ;;;/•'/'('' e' Nthl -(‘22'' 'ow • el, • 1 I "I Lot% or o on7on Lie tott-nat•-.1 \ ----:•-•\ 1. . • .., I .dd ...L"' .... / J A ' i — \ ,..--„) , 1 , ''''.' .1 / /- \ \ \,,," 1 ../ • ' 1 i N , . , ,....... / ,. , , ..., ' ,, I! • to 1 I 141! 1101 11 1 . ‘ / 1. ‘, \ 3 ' '1 ,.' .. , , ". I •P 1 1 • ' .. •-. 1' p SA ) 1 , . 1, .. ... 7 / 1 1 ,;$1111 / \ ! ) i l i. ,,,, ‘. , .. ^ ., ,....., ,..„ ,,, . ..„, ..,,, .., ' ,... .„ // ; 11; 1 ,..„..2 \ 1 / ,1 h .. ■ 1 t ot jiht . tiltl. Il''''' I - ri.... `,....... „,,,, ._ ; ,,,,,, 1„,,,,. _ ,„... ..., ,, . ( .• MAMIE.. 1, Ni..._ ,..i.,,,,,,,e,,, .• ...„ ,-, \ \ '',„ ..._-,..../ ,,,-....,- --,., .... .,,;,.., s ... -.., - s.... ., '\, \ /1 ,-. , ..... , , ,.. . .1 s., ,.. ,..,,,,, i l'i'ir'`.• ..... • •. • ..... ,. , , , , , x ‘ r' ' - / I '' \ '1 ' ' ' \ 14 (%* '..tt ' " ' -, .., /r.".".).• ''.• .: .' `• ‘ \ .1 I 1 ,/ ( '- 1 i ' 1 ( i' 1 '; .• ••• • • • • / \ r/ i ... ..., jk , 1 k , , 1,, : 11 i/.:...,._ ffiv, 1.,,,,,,,... /4, `,,\:\,;' \,,‘,\., .,..'_..„ /1 1 i , , , , - •„,"5 •I ' . 1 / , ■ , • 1 ' ' • 1111 7 ', t 1- ,___. , ! ■ li.,... \ I ir,, •,.. , , ,, \ OV \ ',, - !- -... .. , / - !I , r / i , „ !!!..„ \ . s A 1 •• „ .•• -• , • • 0 ( / 1 .1 ''", „ ) ;I j ) ) "■11PA ,- - , 1 1 ' / ' / 1 ' / 11 •••• .....1) / , 1 i • . / ,, • "'" 1 ■ i 1 . . ,.... 9.01 / i 1" .... { l k / ' ' l If / ' , ' • ' ) \ 1 '''• -• / ) ) / / „/ k .. k 1 I ' - / -• .. . . , „ •-• i •.5,5:-..s. 51, 11: 4 - 1 1 i / /' t .... ,..,.., . . s ,,„ ,. - / . ttsttilt".7. 141 fr: / /1 / /1111/1/ ( "-t-riiJo..-V1' 1/ ill'''''`;‘`rt:/111-7'.1 1.1:- \ -- - -" • • 11I r.09;9°q‘ - 1 - ' i___: 4 • ! , SI - 14 ( \ ...- ' , ". ......... -•', / / ', I 1 ' f ..5.,„ .-*".",..,.;',..\515‹ . 1 5 N',4474., \ / -' ', • , 7...... •-• • , ''' ' , •• ,/ 1 ., „ ./ ... ) / i 1 ' 1 / , f / „; 3 \ , r " ',;•1/4.5 ' ..„ •.„, ,V55".54,45, l•••• ....,-'/,'„------------------ ......,-..„--'1.. , \ 1 ,.../,_..... .. / ...„ , L. ,, I ,,,,,...--- .,,,,,/ , 1 5 / j 1 i t .„.. / .,. , 1 1 1 ,7 1 1 l I I 7 f ; : 0:47 c, \ - J • 1 ./ / ' 1 , ?,1 1 ? ,• , c-r-,1 ,, i' .,,..'' A -• 11 \ 14N".51 '- " k / i i k'5 ''' - ., \ :4 i 1 i •-•-• • / ,... 1 , N.-- .... ,t„. re 1 I' .,, ,.. , , , • .., , i / ‘, ''51 / / 1/4,,.../ ..... .... .., ,, , ... ' ;1.1,i1,.....id,..(i .... - e• id‘st':'0 '''''51 If ,,,,,,,,,,oro ,,,,,,.. ,00,6,,, N './..' 1 .--• — — ,, 1 / /„. .4 / ) ‘f,... 4. ott.,,, ‘, il I\ LI,. ,.1 ; `‘ 1 41) ' 111 \ ' ,.'", ',..,' ' •,,,,, f i' ..,,/ I, ... 1 I 1 / \ 1 \ - / f I ) 1 \ i I i '`. 1 I II: ',1,(:',;,:li% .;'7::e ' a 1 t • • / ) • r , , i 1,1 1 - - r 1 i --- "" - ' 1 I ,' ''"'". '', 1 r 4 ' 1 li 1, ,, , ..., .. ,.., , I' ' \ - -•• "--"-** / '' d- •• ••',, ,( ". y' ,, .... ,,,. ..... et•-• ,•• j , .• .. ... ,. ...e,,, ' 1 ‘ / /, •• •, .. . 1: " --- . I •••• .•. .. „. . • •, ! 1- \ \ C4,,,,, ,,...:.,p i'N 1 ;1 rit KT \Lend %JUN \ 04506 MII0 TI a Nordena31 Quotes of Seaton 13, Townnbip 31. Hoge 22, nolo Conty, ElinnosonaIXCEPT d Noon NAM Ina or the W44! 440 Otero} 1300. IN) &mimed Q3r1 5or 3/0o1051 11, Towi33111p11. Hoge 21. Anoko Cooly, Mintionan.11xart dog pal taken Tot Lamm< I lIghenty Ion:awe Highway N13/{11111 15Id ontL Thn South IMO of O. ill SOK old no Satin INN 01the SannweNtharta nal gir Soon I NNW do Soh II all of the Solna,. Now, 111H.T1T ne North 110 tea sAri, thrcc Om-des 03030 4vullfiwc,100VIef of Tho Sooth,,•,1,)10001 Salim 1 2, 3101103i3 .1 , 331111331 11, Atniku Cooly, Linot000t, Ma in ache Stoat the Souhoo Eunoc o Salvo 12, TonnOtp 31 Ra 22. Anoko County, Monnoola, lying Woody of the Woody rig1. t.0.0.ny Ion of boon* Htgloway 1113 end Sougnsly 0/I/o 3notttly natation of' Pot Noth 001 Saab liar,' inn No111 Half or No Singh Ilalt at Sonthway Quota of lad Satan 12. Sulam to amnion, to.loctioo3 and resortation.of taco& VICANITY MAP (1401 TO SCALE) INO LANES, MN 3100' 4304 14) 74/4 / L.1., 1 I \ ,t 1 ■ .;"/ / / / • .„„/ , /r< , ,• e r/ 1 k \\ , \ I ' I ;;;;r5d 1.."7/ r •... \*." eel \ ir ssr „ r ' y I • \ ' _7'1 • • N., ■ yi (7; /) `. y ; ,„ r," , • ' '41011. •••-'316:3A GLENN- oci cr,-eroonvosorrrop.dyn 7/25/200$ ati4k*'0 'el.; ,;•.1:',."",;.; $,I.AT TED 411- AgI1 uty• dENCIANIAANS S01.11.0ES1 CglARTEH CORNER Or 5EC11011 33, 10011190 31, HANOI 22. ANOKA COLINTy MONUMENT 3361H 11/ 9/1/1(94 111162 nt•ID WEST QUARTER CCPNEN 08 3EC11014 1.3, TOONSHIP 31. RANGE' 22, ANNA COONEY MONUMENT 433 7/3 ELEVASON 613,79 «Kai 10.11 33/000 9 101e0 et:PC 031111EA1/0 eT 801.011I1/ 01101111 0E901ES APPROTNATE LOCATION OF 7/3113 A (AREAS OF 100 TEAR FLOOM PEN 1013A ETAF COMMI/N117-PANEL NUTIFIEN 270015 0010 13, EFFEcow DATE: Mn1 17, 1957. G RA P HIC SCALE 210 IN nu) 1 Inch NO H. CON1(333 IN1TR914. TfifilICAL OMUM - 65 31 000.0 OZNOIES EFISTING ELEVATION E1I51R10 C0N3113/R 431 CENOTES LOAM POLE DENOTES CHAIN LINK FENCE —A— 1)E3/0119 BARBED Wit FENCE /1 CENOTES WELL IEC1 MOTES TELEPHONE KM •-••• .d '• 3 DENOTES TREE 1031E 0 0E140300 MAIN 11/, 93/4/ • REHBBTN (A") COMPANSf 0. SHEET OF 2 1-7 \ Li 17,910Phiciti' infJP •akiNgl 14") 47.3 / 0 CSAH 14 North !.; o SO 1C0 200 4000"50.10.0 • Land Use Data Land U o Units Awes Commercial 500 - 600900 SF 55 - 70 Residential - Single Family 400- 420 units - MultlFamily 800 - 830 units 1200 -1250 units 150 - 170 Open Space NM 80 - 95 Public Right of Way 14//1 55 i (dal 363 Legend Commercial Single Family Residential Multi-family Residential NMI Open Space Concept Plan alit P041000 kw, LANDFORM CERITIMX tifatitafit 10■4000,001,11,.., r000 014 • , 1'1 " 4.1 " ■i0„.sitoce • MI tltitttthlithttt �l41 LANDFORM ainx1ereus rn0EXIX 4Shit5qb� + CENTEX HOMES SO Years of HonHbo dIng rt ii ill hhtl1 I R 1'I r w 0 50 100 200 North IiNie NOM�. • Phasing Plan a