Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/12/2005 P&Z Packet• CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, October 12, 2005 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 14 and September 27, 2005 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING to Amend the Planned Unit Development for Legacy at Woods Edge to include signage criteria — Paul Bengtson B. CONTINUED: Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Legacy at Woods Edge — Paul Bengtson 1. CONTINUED: Site Plan Review for Legacy Hotel 2. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for outdoor dining, and a Site Plan Review, for Betty's Pies Restaurant 3. CONTINUED: Site Plan Review for Lakewood Apartments 4. CONTINUED: Final Plat for Village No. 4 VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. AUAR Update B. Meeting Rules C. Requiring sidewalks in subdivisions VII. ADJOURN • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : September 14, 2005 TIME STARTED : 6:38 P.M. TIME ENDED : 11:45 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Hyden, Laden, Nelson, Pogalz, Rafferty, Root, and Tralle. MEMBERS ABSENT : None. STAFF PRESENT : Jeff Smyser; Michael Grochala; and James Studenski; Paul Bengtson I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Rafferty called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:38 p.m., September 14, 2005. Chair Rafferty stated on behalf of the Planning & Zoning Board he expressed the Board's sympathy for the family of Officer Silvera and requested a moment of silence in remembrance. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: AUGUST 10, 2005 Mr. Tralle made a MOTION approve the August 10, 2005 Minutes and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Rafferty declared open mike open at 6:40 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:41 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 2 A. Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Apollo Landing, Equinox Development LLP, 540 Lilac Street Staff stated Equinox Development was previously approved by the City Council (in the form of a Development Stage Plan) for a 5 lot commercial subdivision on property located at 540 Lilac Drive. The application included a Rezoning to GB (General Business), a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Planned Unit Development, a Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and allocation of commercial MUSA reserve. The developer has now applied for a final plan for the hotel and is proposed for lot 1 of the plat. The final plat application includes the final building plans for the hotel as well as the final plat for the site. The developer will also include a restaurant pad on lot 5, and retail /commercial pads on Lots 2, 3, and 4. Those lots will be designated as outlots on the final plat and will be required to come back for final plan when building plans are prepared. Staff presented their analysis and recommended approval of the final plan for the hotel at Apollo Landing subject to the following conditions: 1. The first three feet of the base of the hotel must be constructed using belden brick, jewel blend as is called out currently as an alternate on the elevation. 2. The vinyl fence for the project must be a minimum of 80% opaque. 3. 20 additional parking spaces will need to be built within the subdivision to provide the minimum number of parking spaces for the proposed use. 4. Infiltration ponds must include city native seed mix, supplemented with potted plants. 5. A three -year management contract with and experienced native plant establishment and maintenance company must be established. 6. All sodded areas must be irrigated. 7. Mulch for landscape areas must be wood chip mulch rater than rock mulch. 8. Substitute Red or Autumn Blaze maples for all Norway maples on the landscape plan. 9. A revised landscape plan depicting all of the required changes in landscaping must be approved by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. Mr. Tralle stated having only three feet of base was not a tall enough base and believed this would look out of proportion. Mr. Bengston responded it was not the applicant's intention the base would be brick and the architectural design standards did not require masonry materials for the base, but staff was recommending a three -foot base. DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 3 Chair Rafferty agreed this did not look right and believed it would be better to have all brick for the same portion being shown, or try and identify another type of material that would be acceptable. Mr. Bengston stated the Design Standards talked about the base, but it did not specify what type of base, however the applicant was trying to meet the design standard by using a textured base. He noted at a minimum masonry was what they would like to see on this structure. Mr. Nelson asked if the rest of the coloring would be the same. Mr. Bengston replied the developer would need to answer this question. Mr. Laden asked if they could still require the base be higher than three feet. Mr. Bengston replied the Board could recommend a specific condition to meet the requirements. Mr. Laden asked if the three feet was a mandatory requirement. Mr. Bengston replied it was not a mandatory requirement because this was being worked on before the requirements were approved. Mr. Pogalz asked if this would be the tallest building in Lino Lakes if it was constructed as proposed. Mr. Smyser responded he did not know of any other buildings that were this tall, but it would not be unusual for new buildings around a City Hall to be this tall. Mr. Pogalz asked if the Fire Department could reach the fourth story with the equipment they currently had. Mr. Bengston stated the Fire Department received all of the applications and if they had a concern, they would have the opportunity to express their concern. Chair Rafferty stated he believed Eaglebrook Church was about this height also. Mr. Smyser replied that Church was very close in height to this proposed hotel. Mr. Laden asked if they had any examples of the color renderings being proposed. Mr. Bengston replied they had and he showed the proposed color renderings. Mr. Laden asked if the base material was dark as depicted on the color rendering. Mr. Bengston replied it was similar to a brick color. Mr. Laden stated he believed the color differentiation as well as texture differentiation achieved the goal of the architectural standards rather than the 3 -foot high proposal. Mr. Laden asked if the cap was differentiated enough. Mr. Bengston replied staff believed it was not quite as bold as it could be, but it did cap off the top of the building. Mr. Nelson stated he did not believe there was enough of a contrast in the color scheme. Mr. Root asked if there was a large surface, would the color contrast be more apparent. Mr. Laden noted the color differential would be different at various times during the day also. He stated the color scheme did not bother him. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 4 Mr. Pogalz stated he believed they would see the color differential once it was on the large building. Mr. Nelson stated he would support the opinion of the professional architect. Mr. Tralle asked if the color on the top cornice was different than the columns. Mr. Bengston replied he believed that was a shadowing technique on the rendering and it was intended to be the same color as the columns. Mr. Tralle noted he liked the effect. Chair Rafferty invited the applicant to make comment. Craig Piette, 425 Arrowhead Drive, Lino Lakes, stated size and distance will give the proposed colors definition. Mr. Pogalz stated he understood why they were not putting brick on the bottom, but he would like to see brick on the base. He noted a brick base would not get damaged with lawn care and snow removal. He indicated it was better maintenance to have brick and it would keep the building looking good. Mr. Piette believed they were a step above any "shoddy" construction techniques. He stated the quality of the building was top notch, with different colors and textures. He noted their position was that they trusted the manufacturer that the base is a solid construction technique and they had used the product many times in the past. Mr. Pogalz stated stucco looked great in many colors, but he still would prefer brick. He stated if they were not willing to go more than three feet on the base, he would prefer the base was not put in at all because he believed the landscaping would cover up the base eventually anyway. He recommended they put more money into the landscaping. Mr. Piette stated he would also like to have brick on the building, but in reality, he did not believe the numbers would come in favorable to putting brick on the building. Chair Rafferty stated the signal the Board was sending was that they did not want three feet in the base size. He believed the base product should include a thick skin as a protector, which would be a stronger product. He asked them to look into this suggestion. Mr. Tralle asked if they had met with Mr. and Mrs. Partridge regarding the fencing. Mr. Piette stated they had met with them and he went out on the property to show them where the fence would be located. He noted the Partridge's kitchen window was over 120 feet from the proposed fence. He stated they were still talking with them about this and it was an ongoing discussion. He indicated he was willing to work with them to get their issues resolved. Chair Rafferty stated he did not understand where the extra 20 parking stalls would be put in. Mr. Piette replied they were working with staff on this. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 5 Chair Rafferty stated he believed they could add an additional four or five trees along the road on the entrance. Mr. Piette responded they had considered all of this, but when they took into consideration the width of the entry area, as well as allowing room for pedestrians, as the trees mature, he believed the landscaping would be perfect. He indicated the distance would not be that much, especially with the ground cover around it. Chair Rafferty stated he would like to see trees closer than 50 feet and he asked staff to work on this. Chair Rafferty asked if they had specific colors for trim. Mr. Piette replied it would be bronze. Mr. Pogalz asked if the windows would be tinted. Mr. Piette responded he was not familiar with the window treatments. Mr. Tralle stated he did not see why they wanted to put in 20 parking spaces right now and he did not think in the first year they would need the extra 20 parking spaces. He believed this was a moot point because there was not a call for the parking spaces at this time. Mr. Bengston stated they were trying to obtain the minimum parking required on the site, even though the parking stalls might not be used until some time in the future. Mr. Piette asked for clarification on staff recommendation number 1. He noted all of the environmental issues they had worked on and agreed to. He stated with respect to condition number 7, wood mulch, this was not the understanding they came away with after their meeting. He stated they were intending on using river washed rock around the perimeter in the nonplanted areas. The wood mulch would be used in the planted areas. Chair Rafferty asked if they could do wood mulch. Mr. Piette responded they would not object to this, but it would be a mess. However, he noted it would be cheaper for them to put in mulch rather than rock. Chair Rafferty stated they would still need to maintain the mulch by replacing it every couple of years, if not annually. He asked if the landscaping would be irrigated. He expressed concern the landscaping would not be maintained sufficiently. Mr. Bengston stated they could reword the condition to include all sodded and landscaped areas must be irrigated. Mr. Laden stated in his opinion you used mulch in planted areas, but areas without plantings, he did not believe they should require mulch and he would not object to rock in those areas. Mr. Bengston stated with respect to Condition 1, he would recommend the Board strike the proposed language and add the following language: The Board encourages the use of brick for the entire base of the hotel. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 6 Mr. Laden asked if they should require the entire 11 feet as shown on the elevation. Mr. Piette stated it was their thought that as long as the product was approved by the City, it was their position they could use it. Mr. Root stated a three -foot brick face did very little and from a distance it would not enhance the site. He stated it was proportionate to have the 11 -foot contrast on the front and it did not matter if it was brick or stucco. He stated in his opinion either one of the materials worked fine, but he would like to see the contrast with whatever material they used. Mr. Laden agreed and believed the face needed to be differentiated. He stated if the ordinance was written that there was a required three -foot base, then he believed staff needed to look at this, especially since they were looking at taller buildings in the City. Mr. Bengston stated this was being proposed as one of the Ordinances, but Council had the discretion to require a larger band of material as the base. Mr. Tralle asked about signage. He asked if the only signage on the building was out front. Mr. Piette stated he could not quote the sign plan. Mr. Bengston stated the sign standards were in the signage requirements and they would need to meet the standards. He noted they would be required to request a sign permit for any proposed signage. Chair Rafferty stated Condition number 1 would be changed to: The developer is encouraged to use the alternate brick material for the entire base of the building. He indicated staff was going to work with applicant on the fence issue. He stated they would also work on the 20 additional parking spaces. He noted condition number 6 would read: All sodded and landscaped areas must be irrigated. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend approval of the final plat for the hotel at Apollo Landing subject to the conditions as noted in staff's September 14, 2005 report and as revised at tonight's meeting was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 6 -0. B. Rezone to R -1 and GB, Preliminary Plat and MUSA Allocation, Pine Glen, 7930 Lake Drive Staff stated the Planning. and Zoning Board held the public hearing for 23, LLC's request for a 78 -lot single- family residential and 2 lot commercial subdivision entitled Pine Glen at the August 10, 2005 regular meeting. The public hearing was closed, some direction was given to staff and the developer in regards to the concerns of both the public and the Board, and the item was tabled. This item is now being brought forth with some revisions and additional information. The request has been modified to include Rezoning to R -1X (Single Family Executive) and GB (General Business); 63.81 acres of MUSA allocation; and a preliminary plat for 72 residential and 2 commercial lots. DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 7 The subject property is located on the east side of Lake Drive approximately 900 feet south of Main Street. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density sewered residential use and it is currently zoned R -X (Rural Executive), R (Rural), and GB (General Business). The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on Thursday, July 28, giving notice to neighbors using mailing labels supplied by the City of Lino Lakes Community Development Department. Staff presented their analysis and recommended approval of the rezoning to R -1X (Single Family Executive) and GB (General Business); Pine Glen Preliminary Plat; and MUSA allocation, subject to the following conditions: 1. Phase 1 of the project including 40 residential lots can not be final platted until 2006. The final plat for phase 2 of the project including 32 residential lots can not be final platted until 2007. 2. A sign must be provided at the northern terminus of Street C and the southern terminus of Street B that include that the road is intended to continue in to the future. 3. Homeowner's Association documentation must be submitted with the final plat application. • 4. Park dedication fees must be paid in accordance with the City fee schedule. • 5. A site and building plan review must be completed for both of the commercial lots prior to any commercial activities on those sites. 6. All existing structures must be removed prior to the approval of a final plat for any portion of Phase 1. 7. 4.08 acres of commercial MUSA is hereby allocated to the commercial portion of the site. 8. 20.49 acres of residential MUSA for the year 2006, and 24.29 acres of residential MUSA for the year 2007 are hereby allocated to the residential portion of the site. 9. City native seed mix must be used in all drainage ponds and wet areas and a 3 -year management plan must be established with a reputable management company. 10. Right -of -way for Lake Drive shall be dedicated as 60 feet from centerline. 11. A 15 -foot wide trail easement along Lake Drive will need to be dedicated to the City prior to the City Council approving any final plat for the project. This easement will need to be outside of the ultimate right -of -way width for Lake Drive. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 8 12. A sidewalk or trail connecting the private trail system to the commercial site and ultimately to the Lake Drive trail must be built as part of the first phase of this development. 13. The project is subject to Rice Creek Watershed review and approval. 14. The project is subject to Anoka County Highway Department review and approval. 15. A temporary cul -de -sac must be provided at the southern terminus of Street C. 16. Plans depicting the integration of Street A into Lois Lane must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. 17. The outlots shown on the plat must be turned over to the City, but shall in no way reduce the park dedication fees required for the project. 18. Lot 23 of Block 3 and Lot 13 of Block 2 must be increased in area to meet the 12,825 square foot minimum lot area of the R -1X (Single Family Executive) zoning district. 19. Full engineering plans must be submitted for City staff review prior to this item being scheduled for the City Council. Mr. Hyden asked where the screening would be located. Mr. Bengston replied there was no specific requirement for screening between two residential uses. He indicated there was not additional screening being proposed. Mr. Hyden believed the trip generation estimates appeared low and he requested staff review the numbers. Mr. Pogalz asked if the street widths were something they needed to add as a condition. Mr. Bengston stated that should be added as an additional condition. Mr. Pogalz stated number 20 would read: Streets to be 32 feet from back of curb to back of curb. Mr. Pogalz asked for clarification on condition 17. Mr. Bengston replied the outlots would be turned over to the City for City ownership. Mr. Rafferty asked if the trail on the outlot would be the City's responsibility or the developer. Mr. Bengston replied the greenway area would be turned over. He amended condition 17 to read: The greenway Outlot, instead of the Outlots. He noted the path as shown should be a private path used by the development, which would be a woodchip trail and the Park Commission would determine if there was a need for a fully developed City trail for a portion of this site to link this development to the park along Lake Drive. Mr. Tralle stated he wanted the trail to be installed to the City standard. Mr. Bengston replied this trail would not serve the entire City and therefore staff was not recommending it be installed to the City standard. DRAFT MINUTES • Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 9 Mr. Tralle stated he believed the trail would be used by residents other than the 72 people in this development. He believed people on Lois Lane would also use this trail. He stated if they did not install this trail properly, it would never get installed properly. He indicated he wanted this to be made a public paved trail. Mr. Laden stated if the developer was willing to do the trail to City standards, would this then be a private trail. Mr. Tralle stated he did not want this trail exclusive to this development and he wanted it to be a public trail to be used by everyone. Chair Rafferty noted just because the trail was constructed, did not mean the City had the means to take care of it, but he agreed the path should be a City owned path. He believed the residents from Lois Lane would use the path and it would not be used exclusively by this development only. He stated the question was how they could require the developer to do this because he was already paying a fee for the parks. Mr. Tralle replied they could determine the cost of the trail and then deduct that amount from the park dedication fee. Mr. Bengston replied this trail was not on the parks and trails plan the City was looking to pursue in the future and staff believed this would be a minimal impact on the trail layout for the City and would not be used by all of the residents. Mr. Tralle stated now was the time to start laying out trail for the north end of the City and if it took money out of the park funds, this should still be done. • Mr. Laden stated just because this was not on the parks and trails plan, did not mean they should not put in a trail when the opportunity arose. Mr. Nelson stated he believed the reason they were giving the City an Outlot was to eventually tie in the trail system. Mr. Hyden asked how residents who wanted to would bike to The Legacy at Woods Edge development get there. Mr. Bengston replied staff believed there was sufficient road connections for the residents to use to get to that development. Chair Rafferty requested they add a Condition 21 to read: The Boardmembers feel very strongly this should be a City paved trail with the appropriate funds being deducted from the park dedication fees. Mr. Root asked if the greenway Outlot would only be Outlot C. Mr. Bengston responded that was correct. He believed a woodchip was not an appropriate trail for serving a neighborhood such as this, even if it was a private trail. He stated he also believed this should be a public trail. Mr. Laden asked why did the traffic study use traffic generation numbers of 2005 and not 2007 when the project would be completed. Mr. Studenski replied when the traffic analysis is done, they prepare it at the time the project is proposed and they do not extend it out to when it was completed. He noted this was the standard practice. He stated there was no guarantee that the timeframe would be 2007 either. He stated it was difficult to determine the timeframe. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 10 Mr. Pogalz asked if this was an industry standard. Mr. Studenski replied that was correct. Chair Rafferty invited the developer to make comment. Mike Quigley, 23 LLC, apologized for not being able to attend last month's meeting. He noted he had a family medical emergency that evening. He stated his plans depicted the R -1X standard. He stated this was a difference of 6 lots from the R -1 standard. To address the trail, he was looking for some direction on the trail and it was their intent the greenway system to cover Outlots A, B, and C to be turned over to the City and have the trail as a public trail. He stated he would be willing to pave the trail, if there was consideration given on the park dedication fee. With respect to traffic, the figures were the same standard used on all traffic studies. Mr. Pogalz asked if they were still seeking the 78 lots. Mr. Quigley stated he wanted to know from the Board which direction they should go. He stated he was presenting what they provided as an alternative. Mr. Hyden noted they wanted to see a blend between the current neighborhood and the new development. Chair Rafferty believed R -1X was the direction they were looking at. He stated while this was not perfect, they wanted to make the blend as best as possible and while he would like the number to be smaller, the rule is what it is. Mr. Hyden agreed with Chair Rafferty. Mr. Laden asked if there was a possibility of a sidewalk on Street A. Mr. Quigley stated in his mind, it was either a trail or a sidewalk, but not both. Mr. Laden stated he would agree to forego the sidewalk, as long as the trail was paved. Mr. Quigley stated they did not want a private trail and they were willing to pave the trail as long as there was consideration on the park dedication fees involved. He stated there was sufficient right -of -way for the wider street also. He indicated the previous plan showing the narrower street was in error. Mr. Root stated he also wanted a paved trail and hoped it would be a public trail. He suggested they make this recommendation to the City Council. With respect to the R -1X, he believed this was appropriate. Chair Rafferty asked if anyone in the audience wanted to make comments. Jolie Lahlum, 931 Lois Lane, stated she was excited about the trail being made public. She asked if they put a stop light on Street A, how would the access to the retail and park area work. She noted the VFW and the park were busy on the weekends and if the only way for them to have access to those areas were through Lois Lane, there should be another conduit or service road in order for them to access the retail areas. She noted there was an opportunity to do this in the power line easement. DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 11 Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend Rezoning to R -1X (Single Family Executive) and GB (General Business) and was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Lyden asked if it was appropriate to approve the sketch plan. Mr. Bengston stated it was appropriate, but recommended adding Condition 22: The preliminary plat be revised to meet all R-1X standards. Mr. Quigley stated he was okay with the conditions as discussed. He stated he would like Condition 3 struck as there would not be a Homeowner's Association. Mr. Bengston replied this Condition could be struck because the Outlots were going to be deeded to the City. However, if there were outlots to be maintained, then this condition would still apply. Mr. Bengston revised Condition 17 to read: All outlots shown on the plat shall be turned over to the City, but shall in no way reduce the park dedication fees required for the project. Mr. Quigley stated one of the goals they were trying to accomplish in the trail was for consideration to the people to the south and he felt there was more value than just the trail and there is a value to the land also which they should receive consideration for. He stated the upland the path is on had a value. Mr. Bengston stated this would be reviewed by the Park Board and it would be up to them to come up with a recommendation for the park dedication fees. He believed the Board's recommendations were okay at this point and let Council look at both the P &Z and the Park Board's recommendations and determine which the appropriate way to go was. Mr. Tralle suggested they leave this as written and let this go to the Park Board and City Council for their decision. He noted whether the path went in or not, there where the three Outlots going to go to the City. Mr. Quigley stated there was never a determination to have a Homeowner's Association and this was meant to be a public area. Mr. Bengston stated the conditions as written were the staff s recommendation and the Board did not necessarily have to have an agreement with the developer. Chair Rafferty stated he would like to leave Condition 17 as it was. Mr. Quigley stated he would like to move forward and obtain the Park Board's recommendation. Mr. Root stated he was prepared to vote on the conditions as agreed upon. He noted this discussion was not progressing forward. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to recommend approval of Pine Glen Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions as noted in staff's September 14, 2005 report striking Condition No. 3, leaving Condition 17 as it was written in staff's report, and adding Conditions 20, DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 12 21, and 22 as discussed at tonight's meeting and recommending approval of MUSA allocation and was supported by Mr. Root. Motion carried 6 -0. Chair Rafferty recessed the meeting at 9:25 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:40 p.m. C. PUBLIC HEARING, to Amend the Planned Unit Development for Legacy at Woods Edge to include a hotel as a permitted use Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 9:40 p.m. Staff stated Hartford Group has requested plans for a hotel within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project. The previously adopted Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide did not include a hotel as one of the permissible uses in Chapter 3.1. A hotel would be a positive addition to the project as it would offer a diversity of uses and additional users for the businesses located within the project. A hotel is an appropriate mix with retail and office, and is considered a permissible use within the GB (General Business) zoning district by the zoning ordinance. GB (General Business) is a standard commercial zoning classification for the City and allows commercial uses similar to what would be allowed within the commercial districts of the Legacy project. Staff feels that this omission was not meant to prohibit the use within the Commercial and Mixed Use districts, but rather was just an oversight at the time. In fact the guidelines contain a parking standard for a hotel, which would indicate it was a use that was anticipated within the development. Staff has had discussions regarding hotels in the Legacy project as far back as when Calthorpe was still involved in the project. Staff has even had discussions with the City Council at work session were the use was proposed and met no specific objections at the time. Staff recommended approval of the amendment of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide to add Hotel as a permissible use within the Commercial Districts. Chair Rafferty invited anyone for or against this proposal to make comment. There were no comments made. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 9:42 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Root. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Hyden asked if a hotel would fit in this area. Mr. Bengston replied staff felt it would be an appropriate mix and use within this development. He noted this has been discussed with the City Council at a Worksession also. Mr. Hyden stated it seemed to him to be out of place, but on the other hand it was a retail area, so it might not be out of place. He indicated it belonged, but it didn't belong either. He stated he did not object to another hotel in the City, but he was not sure it would be supported. DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 13 Mr. Lyden stated the whole concept for this area was for mixed uses and he believed this was an appropriate use for this area. He asked if staff was certain they should strike mixed use districts. Mr. Bengston replied it was staff's recommendation to limit the hotel to Commercial Districts. Mr. Tralle stated he was surprised this had come up because he had always thought it was a part of the original plan. Mr. Pogalz stated he was also surprised and stated if they were going to have a hotel, what was submitted had a long ways to go before approval and stated the guidelines had to be followed. Bob Moberg, SEH Engineering, clarified what was being proposed and the mixed use areas. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend approval of the PUD Amendment — Permissible Uses Hartford Development, Inc. and was supported by Mr. Root. Motion carried 6 -0. D. PUBLIC HEARING, to Amend the Planned Unit Development for Legacy at Woods Edge to include signage criteria Staff stated they are working with the developer to come up with an acceptable signage criteria for the Legacy at Wood's Edge project. They had intended on presenting a draft at this meeting, however it has proven to be more difficult and time consuming than originally anticipated. At this time a draft is not ready for review by the Planning and Zoning Board. Staff is recommending that the Public Hearing be continued to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 9:50 p.m. There were no comments made. The Board continued the public hearing to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. E. Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Legacy of Woods Edge 1. Site Plan Review Staff stated the Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a hotel within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the hotel as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). • Staff presented their analysis and recommended continuing this item to the October 12, 2005 meeting. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 14 Mr. Pogalz indicated there needed to be some level of detail given to the backside of the building due to the placement of it on the lot. Mr. Root asked if the architectural feature on the corner of the lot was going to be included in this plan or was it separate with the site plan. Mr. Bengston responded there was an architectural feature where the road curves to the east that was something not shown on the plans. He stated they have redesigned the lots in this area to enlarge the area for the hotel and it was staff's intention to have more emphasis put on the street side entry. Mr. Tralle asked if the shutters were in the approved standards. Mr. Bengston stated staff has had a lot of debate about the shutters and depending upon the types of materials used, shutters could meet the standards, but if they cannot meet the materials required, they would not be allowed to use the shutters. Chair Rafferty stated he was confused as how this hotel's design would fit into The Legacy at Woods Edge development. He indicated this needed to be looked at very strongly. He stated this hotel design was colonial and he was not sure it fit into this area. He asked staff to look at this. Mr. Laden stated he agreed with the comments and it did not seem to fit into what else was in The Legacy at Woods Edge development. Mr. Grochala stated they had always considered this building lot site for a hotel and while they would love to have the Country Inn Suites, the building style had to fit into the style of the development and the colonial style did not fit into what they wanted for the development. He stated the shutters were a concern and staff would like to see them removed in their entirety. He stated if they had some specific questions for the developer, Patrick was in attendance at tonight's meeting. Mr. Tralle asked if Country Suites could not have their shutters, was the hotel gone. Patrick Sarver, stated he could not speak for the architect, but Country Inn Suites did have some very specific guidelines for the look and style of their building. He noted their architect was in the process of looking at the footprint of the building upon staff's suggestion. He stated this was a unique building and there was an architecturally significant feature on the back of the building, which was a full cultured stone facade. He stated the gable bends on both sides and the exterior treatment feature was upgraded. He believed they would be pleased with what was going to come back to them at the next meeting. Mr. Nelson stated by having a distinct base might go a long way in breaking up the three layers of shutters. He stated three layers of shutters were too much. The Board continued the Final United Development Final Plan for Legacy of Woods Edge to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. 2. PUBLIC HEARING, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor dining, and a Site Plan Review, for Betty's Pies Restaurant DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 15 Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 10:10 p.m. Staff stated the Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a single tenant restaurant within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the restaurant building as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). Betty's pies is a full service restaurant that meets the intent of the City's vision for a family- oriented, neighborhood gathering place in the new mixed use downtown. Owners, Marti Sierber and Carl Ehlenz, run the Two Harbors, Minnesota, destination restaurant and this will be their first expansion into the metro area. Staff reviewed their analysis and recommended this be continued to the October 12, 2005 regular Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Mr. Nelson asked if there was any concern with outdoor dining. Mr. Bengston replied the City encouraged outdoor dining when it was appropriate so it created more of an urban feel, with a vibrant lifestyle for the area. He stated it was a matter of determining that all of the conditions could be met on the site. Mr. Pogalz asked where the outdoor furniture would be stored during the off - season. He asked if they did not have room to store the moveable outdoor furniture would they be required to move it offsite to store it, or store it inside the building. Mr. Bengston replied they would be required to store it inside the building, or offsite at a storage facility. Mr. Tralle asked if there would be sunken tanks for drainage in the parking lots. Mr. Bengston responded that was still included as a part of the plan. Mr. Grochala noted there was a different product out now and in this parking lot they will install a different system using some different drainage techniques. He noted the YMCA parking lot would still have the sunken tanks for drainage in the parking lot. The Board continued the public hearing to the October 12 regular Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Chair Rafferty asked for public comments. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to continue the Public Hearing to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6- 0. 3. Site Plan Review for Lakewood Apartments Staff stated the Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for an apartment building with first floor multi - tenant retail within the Legacy of Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 16 final plan consists of the building plan for the apartment building as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). One of the goals of the mixed use downtown is to provide a variety of housing types and costs to meet life cycle housing needs that are not currently available in Lino Lakes. The development agreement between the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (EDA) and Hartford Group, the developer of the workforce housing, includes housing covenants. The housing covenants include an affordability clause that requires that 20 percent of the housing units built on the development property as a whole must beet affordability requirements. Of that 20 percent, 67 percent must be rental units that meet the income and rent requirements for federal low- income tax credits. This 60 -unit workforce rental housing meetings the 67 percent requirement. In addition, affordable rental housing must meet the following requirements: 1. The developer must retain an experienced, professional property manager, approved in writing by the EDA. 2. The management agreement must require that the manager will use resident selection criteria that include evidence that tenants have income to support their rental rate, rental history showing timely payment of rent, and criminal background checks. 3. The management agreement must include a plan for long -term maintenance and repair of the property. Staff presented their analysis and recommended continuing this item to the October 12, 2005 meeting. Mr. Pogalz stated between the hotel and apartment building these were two very different building types and asked how this would look. Chair Rafferty stated he wanted to see some variety. He did not want it too busy and suggested they have a larger variation in the roofs. He cautioned them to not experiment with too many different products. Mr. Laden asked how much commercial they were giving up by allowing ground floor residential. Mr. Bengston responded the north portion of the building was being taken up by residential, which was over 9,000 square feet. Mr. Laden expressed concern they might be losing too much commercial space. Mr. Bengston noted across the street would be townhomes, so it would blend in with that area and that was the reason staff was recommending first floor residential in this area. Patrick Sarver, stated one of the reasons why they deleted some of the retail along the north portion was by putting residential on that end they could do some architectural tricks to the elevation of that building. The Board continued the Planned Unit Development Final Plan — Lakewood Apartments to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 17 4. Final Plat for Village No. 4 Staff stated Hartford Development has submitted a final plat for Village No. 4, which encompasses Outlots A, and E of Village No. 3. The submitted plat depicts 7 lots and three outlots. Block 1 will consist of four lots. Lot 1 is intended for the apartment /retail building, and Lot 4 is intended for the hotel. Lot 2 and 3 (and Outlot A) are intended for future buildings. Block 2 will consist of three lots. Lot 1 is intended for the shared parking area, Lot 2 is intended for Betty's Pies, and Lot 3 is intended for a future user. Two outlots are included that will also be for future uses. The title commitment for the property and final plat has been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. Staff recommended continuing the Final Plat, Village No. 4 to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The Board continued Final Plat, Village No. 4 to the October 12, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting. F. PUBLIC HEARING, for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Village of Hardwood Creek Chair Rafferty opened the public hearing at 10:42 p.m. Staff stated they have received an application from Village of Hardwood Creek, LLC, to amend the comprehensive plan. A public hearing is required for a comprehensive plan amendment. A comprehensive plan amendment requires a formal vote. The application also includes a general concept plan for a planned unit development. The concept plan review is informal and does not require a vote. The amendment to the comprehensive plan would involve a number of elements. The growth management policy, laid out in Ordinance No. 24 -04 was prepared to implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. The growth management policy requires that several issues be addressed if the City is to accommodate this application. This project application is the first one that requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan as directed by the growth management ordinance. Review of the relevant parts of the comprehensive plan resulted in recommendations to add or change several passages. This application does not include a planned unit development or preliminary plat. It does not include the detailed information normally part of such application. Because of this, staff cannot analyze the project to see if it would qualify for the exemptions to certain growth management limits as a conservation development. In addition, there are some limits from which staff cannot grant exemptions. Therefore, a comprehensive plan DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 18 amendment is needed to address growth issues as well as changing the land use designation for the site. Staff anticipates this application will require additional consideration beyond this meeting, so a special meeting of the P &Z has been arranged for September 27 for further discussion. Staff reviewed their analysis and recommended the Board open the public hearing, take comments, and continue the public hearing to the special meeting on September 27. Mr. Laden asked what was the City gaining by allowing this. Mr. Smyser replied on page 7 of his report addressed this item. Mr. Laden stated he was concerned that the language of the text stated it "may include, but not limited to ". He asked if this was opening the door too wide. Mr. Smyser responded that was a good point and the language might need to be revised. Mr. Nelson believed the intent was to leave it somewhat open and leave it to the City's discretion and he believed they met the criteria. Mr. Laden stated he was not arguing that this project did not meet the criteria, but he was concerned how this might affect other potential developments as well. Mr. Laden stated he was in favor of what he saw and amending the Comprehensive Plan and moving forward with this. He noted he would not be in attendance at the September 27 Special Meeting. Chair Rafferty stated he would like to hear from the audience members and indicated due to the lateness of the hour, he would like to continue staff's comments to the special meeting. Chair Rafferty invited the public to make comment. Greg Hayes, developer, showed the Board what was changing in the zoning. He asked the Board if they had any questions. He noted they would come back to the Board with the specific site details in the future. He indicated the Board would see a lot more modifications and changes as time progresses. Mr. Nelson asked if they owned the land to the south of the development. Mr. Hayes replied they did not own the land, but they had permission to put in the road and this fit road fit into Centerville's long -range plans. Chair Rafferty stated in the commercial parkway area it talked about a roadway as being 24 feet. He asked what the typical parkway type roadway was. He asked if this fell in line with City standards. Mr. Smyser responded how these streets would be laid out would be examined as part of the PUD and plat application, which they were not looking at yet. He indicated they would have to see what happened and the developer was simply DRAFT MINUTES • Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 19 showing some options at this time and was not asking for any type of approval on the roads. Mr. Hayes stated the Board would approve these types of things in the planning process and they were simply showing this information to assist the Board in seeing what something like this would look like. Mr. Laden stated in looking at the Carriage Homes, he would be looking more for a theme as presented in the center picture. Mr. Root stated this looked very nice, but how congruse was it that a couple of big box stores would come into this development. Mr. Hayes stated the theme they wanted to start with was like the Blaine Village and expand from there. Mr. Root stated The Village did not have a residential component. Mr. Hayes stated he realized that and they tried to buffer the residential area with a lot of green space. He stated this again was a detail plan decision and they had done this in other projects, which had been well received. Mr. Nelson asked if they were planning the waterway and the bridge as a transition area between the residential areas and the commercial areas. Mr. Hayes replied that was the intent to create a transition in the project both functionally and visually. He noted they were looking forward on working on the details of this project. Chair Rafferty asked if they were going to go into an in depth study at the Special meeting. Mr. Hayes replied the purpose of the meeting was to go in depth on the language and determine if it met a change to the Comprehensive Plan. Chair Rafferty believed it would be more appropriate to continue this discussion to the September 27 special meeting due to the lateness of the hour. He requested if possible the special meeting be televised. Mr. Smyser replied he would check with the video technician's availability. Mr. Smyser asked the Board to concentrate only on the Comprehensive Plan amendment issues at the special meeting. The Board continued the public hearing for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Village of Hardwood Creek to the Special Planning and Zoning Board Meeting on September 27, 2005. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to continue the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the September 27, 2005 Special Planning and Zoning Board meeting and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Requiring Sidewalks in subdivisions DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 14, 2005 Page 20 Due to the lateness of the hour, the Board continued this item to a future meeting. 2. AUAR Update Due to the lateness of the hour, the Board continued this item to a future meeting. 3. Meeting Rules Due to the lateness of the hour, the Board continued to a future meeting. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Nelson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 11:45 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully submitted, Kathy Altman, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. DRAFT MINUTES AGENDA ITEM V.A • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: October 12, 2005 TOPIC: PUD Amendment — Signage Criteria Hartford Development, Inc. BACKGROUND City staff is working with the developer to come up with acceptable signage criteria for the Legacy at Wood's Edge project. We had intended on presenting a draft at this meeting, however it has proven to be more difficult and time consuming than originally anticipated. At this time a draft is not ready for review by the Planning and Zoning Board. Staff is recommending that the Public Hearing be continued to the November 9, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. • OPTIONS. • 1. Continue the public hearing to the November 9, 2005 regular meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends continuing the public hearing. • AGENDA ITEM V.B.1 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: October 12, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plan — Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) Legacy at Woods Edge BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a hotel within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the hotel as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). .Though a Hotel is not currently listed as a permissible use in Chapter 3 of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide, included on this agenda is a staff initiated amendment to the Planned Unit Development to allow a Hotel as a permissible use in the commercial and mixed use districts. aThe Planning and Zoning Board continued this item at the September 14th regular meeting, and offered up comments to both staff and the developer about the proposal. Numerous revisions have been made to the plans and are addressed throughout this report. ANALYSIS Governing Plans This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit Development for the site. The layout generally follows the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout, with the exception of the combination of lots 11 and 12 to create a single lot. The main entry of the building will be from the parking lot, which is atypical for this type of urban development. However, a secondary access is provided on the building front to service registered guests of the hotel. The proposed Hotel is located in a Commercial Land Use Area were acceptable Building Type is Commercial with a minimum number of floors for all uses of one and a maximum of 3. The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates a build -to line for this portion of that block which will 1i/require that the building be close to the edge of the street to create an intimate pedestrian environment. The • Legacy Hotel, page 3 Ahfor registered guests that have ventured into the development to take advantage of the numerous amenities will till have a pedestrian friendly point of entry. As previously mentioned above, the Regulating Plan identifies an architectural feature at point where Town Center Parkway curves to the east. The standards do not specifically define what format an architectural feature is supposed to take, but it does identify clock towers, bell towers, cupolas, trellises, and ornamental portions of parapet walls as architectural features in other portions of the text. The purpose of the architectural feature at this location is to attract the eye of pedestrians and create a point of visual interest. The central portion of the hotel attempts to accomplish this by being stepped closer to the streetscape, with the masonry materials that cover the entire central section of the building, and with the porch element at the base of the structure. Staff sees these elements as steps in the right direction, but staff is including a condition encouraging the developer to further accentuate the corner with some additional architectural element to increase it's visual impact. The masonry materials that cover the entire central portion of the building on both the front and back clearly accentuate the location of the buildings main entry points. The continuation of masonry materials across the first floor of the entire structure accentuates the scale of the building clearly differentiating the first floor from the rest of the structure. This is furthered by the porches on *he ends of the building and surrounding the secondary access which bring the building to a more human scale. The quoins at the corner work to provide some definition to the breaks in the building facade, furthering the visual impact of the steps in the building elevations. Wile base of the structure is clearly articulated through the use of the brick base applied across the entire uilding facade on all sides; however, the height of the brick base betrays the scale of the building making the first floor look out of scale with the floors above. Staff is recommending a condition that the brick base be raised from its current level to lessen the gap between the cap and the windows of the second floor and correct the scale issue. The top of the building is also clearly articulated with the use of the peaked roof and gable trim. This type of roof dictates that space for mechanical equipment must be provided within the building or outside the building on the ground. If any mechanical equipment is located on the ground it will be required to be screened by a combination of landscaping and screen walls. The building materials proposed for the site include brick, cultured stone, E.I.F.S., and asphaltic roofing material. All of these materials meet the stringent standards of the design guidelines, and are incorporated consistently throughout the building's elevations. The proposed structure has integrated a couple of climatic response devices that meet the design guidelines. Daylighting of the interior space is being achieved through the large number of windows provided. Patrons of the establishment will also be offered shelter from the elements in the entry vestibules /porches. A trash enclosure is depicted on the north side of the site adjacent to Interstate 35W. This structure will need to •be constructed of the same materials as the main building on site, and should include a roof since the height of the building will allow patrons of the hotel to look down upon the enclosure. Additional mechanical /service area is provided on the first floor of the building in the southwest corner, hence the lack of windows on this portion of the building. • • Legacy Hotel, page 4 Wecause this particular building has so many windows, attention and detail to the quality of the windows is mportant. The design standards require a reveal of at least 2 inches from the exterior trim to create shadow for visual interest rather than windows and trim flush with the building. Sometimes this shadow can be created with solid window trim as is depicted on the submitted plans. A condition is included with staffs recommendations to require a minimum two inch thick exterior trim be applied to all windows of this building. Staff is also recommending that the windows on the first floor be better accentuatued with additional trim features. Given this buildings height; it's visibility from the streetscape and the future townhome portion of the project; and the numerous windows provided; the internal window treatments are also of particular concern. Staff has recommended a condition addressing the provision of uniform treatments that will complement the architectural style of the building. Parking Requirements Single Use Peak Hour Demand Rooms Parking Required Parking Provided Surplus 1 space per room 83 83 85 (surface & on- street) 2 Per Chapter 3.5 of the guidelines, the City is maintaining a shared parking analysis for the entire development. This portion of the site (Block 2b) is intended to use standard parking calculations and not be included into the shared parking analysis. As such, each individual use will be required to provide the appropriate number of •Parkin spaces with on site parking (surface and /or underground) and on- street parking. The proposed use is clearly being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout that the applicant has proposed with this application. Block 2b Parking Requirement Parking Factor Parking Required Parking Provided Surplus Hotel 1 space per room 83 rooms 83 85 2 Office (Bldg 13) 3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 27,000 s.f. 81 101 20 Office (Bldg 14) 3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 27,000 s.f. 81 91 10 Total 245 277 32 The proposed use is clearly being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout that the applicant has proposed with this application. Block 2b Single Use Peak Hour Demand Parking Required Parking Provided Surplus Varies 245 277 32 As always, staff will continue to review each project to maintain the parking standards within this block as well •as the entire development. Staff has included a condition requiring that the developer work with staff to identify an appropriate location for bicycle parking facilities on this block. 4, Landscaping Requirements Legacy Hotel, page 5 •The submitted plans meet all of the landscaping requirements of Chapter 3.6. The site plan indicates a total of 81 parking spaces within the surface parking lot. This means that the 13 trees provided throughout the lot exceeds the requirement of 1 tree for every 10 parking spaces. The parking lot abuts Interstate 35W, therefore plantings must occur that `screen' the metal security fence. The proposed landscape plan does depict deciduous trees spaced 60 feet on center, accentuated with coniferous trees; however staff is adding a condition that a minimum of four shrubs be added per tree to this landscape planter to provide adequate screening. The shrubs shown on the planting pallet should be used, and should be spread evenly throughout the planter area. The 81 total surface parking spaces provided in this lot does not meet or exceed the threshold of 300 spaces which would require the implementation of connecting walkways throughout the parking lot. All of the landscaping materials proposed as a part of the planting palette for the site satisfy the comments of the Environmental Board as well as city staff. Lighting The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of *Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. The parking lot fixtures do not meet city standards and are being conditioned to be replaced by shoebox fixtures. The parking lot lighting that will be used for this phase of development must be repeated throughout this block, if not throughout the entire Legacy at Woods Edge project area. It is also recommended that the Domus luminaire located near the south entrance drive be moved further west to better Aikilluminate the drive. A revised lighting plan indicating conformance with these recommendations must be VI/submitted. The building itself will include some architectural and building entry lights mounted directly to the building. These fixtures will be used to highlight the building massing and will enhance the pedestrian environment. Engineering The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and a memorandum including all of their comments is attached to the report. Any outstanding issues will be addressed through the site performance agreement and building permit process prior to construction. Final Plat The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) is attached to the same agenda as a separate item, and a condition will be added to this review that the final plat must be approved prior to City Council approval for this building. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31St regular meeting. Their comments are attached and are addressed in the landscaping portion of this report. 40OPTIONS • 1. Approve the Final Plan for the Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) 2. Deny the Final Plan for the Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites) 3. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION • • Legacy Hotel, page 6 The submitted plans are in substantial conformance with the standards of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Final Plan for the Legacy Hotel (Country Inn and Suites), subject to the following conditions: 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The `gull wing' fixture (type EE and EE1 as shown on sheet C4.1) shall be changed to a shoebox fixture. This fixture type will need to be approved by staff and used throughout the rest of the parking area on this block, if not the rest of the project site. 5. A revised lighting plan indicating the above required fixture changes, and the relocation of the luminaire near the south entrance drive further west must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. 6. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 7. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. 8. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim must be provided in accordance with the development standards for the site. 9. All hotel room windows are required to be supplied with uniform internal window treatments that will complement the architecture of the building. 10. The first floor windows shall be accentuated with additional trim features. 11. The brick base shall be raised to lessen the gap between the cap and the second story windows. 12. The hotel building shall be moved closer to the Town Center Parkway right -of -way, meeting a maximum setback of 15 feet. 13. The developer is encouraged to add an additional architectural element to the central portion of the building to further strengthen the presence of the corner. 14. The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate four shrubs per tree within the north planter island (adjacent to the Interstate 35W right -of -way). ATTACHMENTS 1. SEH memorandum dated October 6, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Country Inn and Suites (Legacy Hotel) plan set received September 27, 2005. • • Memorandum To: Planning and Zoning Board From: Paul F. Bengtson, Associate Planner Date: October 12, 2005 Re: Legacy at Woods Edge Projects Staff is recommending a condition change from what is currently included in the staff report regarding lighting. After further review of the lighting fixtures it was determined that the `gull wing' fixtures depicted on the plan do meet the standards and are preferred by the developer. Staff is in agreement with the developer in regards to the lighting fixtures and would like to replace the recommended condition which currently reads: The `gull wing' fixture (type EE and EE 1 as shown on sheet C4.1) shall be changed to a shoebox fixture. This fixture type will need to be approved by staff and used throughout the rest of the parking area on this block, if not the rest of the project site. With the following condition: All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height; shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be located within landscape planter islands. This will be necessary on all three Final Plan applications on the agenda. Staff will bring this issue up during its presentation on each item and include the condition change as part of the staff recommendation. • SEH • October 6, 2005 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Woods Edge Hotel Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.08 SPCV Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Woods Edge Hotel site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on October 2, 2005. Site Layout and Paving Plan (Sheet C2.0) 1. It is unclear what type of curb is planned for the front of the accessible parking aisles. If the curb isn't ribbon curb, pedestrian curb ramps need to be provided. Further clarification is needed as to where the ribbon curb is located on the site and what is proposed for the end of the accessible parking aisles. 2. According to ADA rules, there should be 4 accessible parking stalls and access aisles for the 81 -space parking lot as shown. Currently, only 3 are being provided. 3. The accessible parking signs are shown in front of the accessible parking aisles rather than the parking stalls. The signs should be moved to the front of the parking stalls. 4. The easterly entrance has a note calling out "Bit curb and gutter..." This should be corrected to be concrete curb and gutter. 5. A hotel check - in/drop -off sign is shown as being located in the drive aisle near the main entrance. All signage must be located behind the curb out of any drive aisles or parking areas. 6. A light pole is shown in the middle of an accessible parking stall east of the main entrance. Grading and Utility Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. The stone sewer running from CBMH 102 to the flared end section is at approximately the same elevation as the 12" trunk water main. The storm sewer should be revised to provide a minimum of 1.5' of vertical clearance. 2. It is unclear why CBMH 103 and CBMH 102 are over 10 feet in depth. It appears that these plans, along with the Lakewood Apartment plans, could be revised to significantly decrease depth, increase slopes, and reduce pipe sizes on the main trunk stonn sewer line. 3. No provisions are made in the trunk stone sewer line for future connections at the lot to the northeast. It is recommended that manholes be placed in the storm line from CBMH 102 to STMH 101 such that future stonn sewer connections can be made in this undeveloped lot. 4. At the southeast corner of the building, there is approximately 30' of sidewalk that will tip back towards the building. If this is correct, additional grading detail should be shown in this area to indicate how runoff will be directed away from the building. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite B, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax • • • Mr. Michael Grochala October 6, 2005 Page 2 5. An 8" gate valve should be provided on the service stub running to the building. 6. Rather than showing a proposed temporary hydrant to be installed, it is recommended that the hydrant be installed in its permanent location and the water main in the northern end of the site be revised to have an 8 "x8" cross connecting the service stub, hydrant, and water main loop which runs through the proposed Lakewood Apartments site rather than the configurations shown on the Lakewood Apartments plan and this plan set. 7. Silt fence is not indicated on the plans. Silt fence must encompass all construction areas, including the overland storm sewer pipe. 8. Wood fiber blanket is required to be used on any disturbed steep slopes such as the storm sewer outlet pipe run to the pond and along the edge of the parking lot on the northeast side of the site. General Comments 1. There are a number of locations where text is on top of text and is very difficult to read. All text should be easily readable. Please call me at 651.765.2912 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Stefan T. Higgins, PE Project Engineer x:\ko \lino] \030508 \plan reviewlwoodsedgchotell 00605 - engineering.doc • • • • Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board August 31, 2005 Legacy at Woods Edge Legacy Hotel: Plant Schedule: Recommend the following changes based on the Plant Schedule - -- Crimson King maple is a Norway maple and of borderline hardiness. Norway maples are also listed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as invasive to our native woodlands. Suggest changing this species to one of the following -- Northern Pin Oak, Red Oak, Bur Oak, Autumn Blaze Maple, Hackberry, American Linden, and Green Ash. Change Greenspire Linden to Redmond Linden (a cultivar of the American Linden). Change Colorado Blue Spruce to White or Norway Spruce. If salt spray is a concern along the freeway (usually within 60 feet), Black -Hills Spruce and Ginkgo may be more tolerant, than eastern Red Cedar and Linden. Sod areas must be shown as irrigated. All top soils* should be described as incorporated into the sub soil for several inches. Erosion Control The developer should submit an erosion control plan that details NPDES requirements and is acceptable to the City. The plan and inspections reports for this plan must be located on site with an indicated location on the plan. Work with staff on lighting and ensuring that lighting meets the minimum standard. Motion to approve recommendations by Bauman, second by Bor. All were in favor. Motion passed. TRASH & RECYCLE /\ \ \8612 CURB. TIP. \TREE CRATE: TYP. TO \MATCH CITY MODEL \ "eb 000 RIdBDN �Ol7�TB. 000. T. STRIPING, TYP. 9 CONC. RIBBO CURB. TYP. ! \ CONC. RIBBON CURB/ TYP. UNIT OF 6612 CURB AND GUTTER UNIT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT V5 15 8612 CJRB. TYP_ ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, TYP.\ • 01.6i1Z,cuRB. TYP. \\ HOTEL 83 ROOMS 81 PARKING STALLS BLDG: 14,900 S.F. / FL. SITE: 67,291 SF (1.54) ACRES .0 CONC. RIBBON CURB, TYP. • 4 p i BIT. PN,IT. SHALL MEET -�� `•. EXLST. PVMT., TYP. BIT. CURB & GUTTER SHALL MEET 005T. CURB & GUTTER. TYP. sail. -LEVEL CROSS S 1.58 '• / MAX. CROSS SLOPE "� ', FOR ORANAGE i s[: ME- .% " / AM 1 = = LOPB:' oi:� 7.56 MAX LOPE,, 5 00' MIN. ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0100( .NAN,w99 GROUP Al. XK.WwuTEAAS AmeA0150N9A.5 1/2" RADIUS- FINISHED r /1 7 3 RADIUS - 5ONR SLOPE GUTTER 3/471' - CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB CURB AND GUTTER (8618) DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 NOTE: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10' -0" 0.5. .5/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS 10 0 1/7 W z 3/0 D TOOLED CONTROL JOINT (MAX. 5' 0.5. DIP.) W/ 1/4" RApe. "-LIGHT 66006 015150 / PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC WITH / / 3 WIDE 51A00TH TROWELLED F1 15" CONCRETE WALK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 5' CANCRElE AS 5000191E0 WI.5 X 01.6 WIRE MESH AND CHARS AS SPECIFIED 6° CUSS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 2. 1/3' WIDE EXPAN0.108 JOINT AT CURBS. 3. WIRE MESH REQUIRED FOR WALKS 6' WIDE CR 114 LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. LIMIT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIMIT OF 8612 CURB AND GUTTER UNIT OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIMIT OF 8612 CURB AND GUTTER BIT. CURB & GUTTER SHALL A10T EXIST. CURS & CUTTER. 1YP. BIT. PVMT. SHALL MEET EXIST. 0001. TYP. IIilIIIilli� /ma� III�iIIIIII !! d I" WEARING COURSE TACK COAT 7 BASE COURSE B° CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE COMPACTED SUBGRAOE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE C2.0 SLOPE GUTTER 3/4 "/1• CONTINUOUS SLOPE CONCRETE / : CURB AND GUTTER % ,-.PAVEMENT MATERIALS FIN15HE0 GRADE 1 r SEE DETAIL RIBBON CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10' -0 0.C. 4/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS 25 R LTO CONSTRUCTION AREA PLAN TO CONSTRUCTION AREA FINISHED GRADE 25' 6' MIN CRUSHED STONE 75' 9.11I1400 EXISTING UNDISTURBED 4-- LAYOUT AND PAVING NOTES: - - 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY ORDINANCE. 2. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES. ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. BOLLARDS. AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL 00 THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. DECORATIVE PAVER LIMITS AND LAYOUT SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT COLORS AND MATERIALS FOR 8E0E0 AND APPROVAL BY NNE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. 105411014 OF BUILDINGS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL COORDINATE 0114 THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 5. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL ENTRANCES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDNANCE. 6. PARKING STALLS SHALL BE STRIPED WT14 A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE. ACCESSIBLE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE %MITE PAINTED 11NE: 16" ON CENTER AND AT 45' ANGLES TO THE STALL. STOP LINES SHALL BE 04" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE. 7. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE EXISTING BENCHMARK AS INDICATED ON THE SURVEY/EMS11NG 509010085 DRAWING. PLANNING NOTES: 1. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION FORM IN SPREADSHEET FORMAT. SEE SPREADSHEET TO COMPARE PERCENTAGE OF PEAK DEMAND FOR KEY T0ES. SIGN SCHEDULE: I STOP SIGN (61 -1) ® HANDICAPPED PARKING (1-34A) & 6200 FINE (1 -39) - VAN ACCESSIBLE (117 -88) MOUNT BELOW SIGN B .) HOTEL CHECK -IN. DROP -OFF AND PICK -UP E RADIUS 17 DIAMETER G LINE WIDTH 3" LINE W10051 5' 6° SQUARE OVERALL 16" RADIUS ACCESSIBLE PAVEMENT SYMBOL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE EXISTING UNDISTURBED I AXRLE FILTER FABRIC NOTES. PROFILE PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STAB1U2ED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTANE0 IN A CONDITION 104I014 WALL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLO94140 OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REWIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING MTH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF 140 ENTRANCE REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED. WASHED. OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. igir MA-PI! 1 °142: ROADWAY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TD SCALE 0 i 551E0 GRADE - PAVEMENT MATERIALS VARY SEE PLAN SLEEVE TO ACC01.11A0DATE REPLACEMENT POST PROCESSED GRAVEL BASE GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP OF 2) ENGINEER GRADE REFLECTNE SCREENED STEEL PANEL AS SPECIFIED GALVANIZED STEEL FLANGED CHANNEL POST AS SPECFIED 12" DIA. CONC. FOOTING. SLOPE TOP OF FOOTING 190 . TO DRAIN IV �D IE COMPAC105 50058000 11 -1 1- SITE TRAFFIC SIGN (STS) DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 '5 4?I 0' E.. » FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER lHARTFORD _ G"ff= CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC u1mvN9uttsw95 MN MAE, NN. SIR- 7K130A 95bN61M1 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 00/15/05 CRY 54000141 00/27/06 CI11 6 04401AL REV. THIS SHEET r, NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SITE LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C2.0 86' -24" RCR 6 1.9 " CtlA 0 .�. L4l • 236' -33" RCP 0 0.15% cGAS• �/" 0 / SEE STORM SEWER - CONTINUED LAYOUT FOR CONNECTION TO POND \` 2 -8" 45' BENDS 0B0H- N2 RE -9•.77 I, 16(5 897.77 IE(- )■891.04 IEI'E) =890.44 \ %71 =8" PV2 11.040 IRRIGATED AREA BB }.W 8" 22.5' BEND 8" 11.25 BEND 22.5' BEND IRRIGATED AREA RD -11 4' RE-905.00 IE.B96.51 6" 8" PLUG 27' -8" PVC 0 0.408 IE STUB .883.84 H 8'0 0BMH -103 56.903.75 IE(SE)- 895.20 IE(5)- 992.39 IE(SW).891.99 PORARY IE(NE)- 891.30\ RANT 9 /05 NO EL -904.6 A / REDUCER • 59 5 D, Y/ 508 B" TEE NH -1 RE.903.50 0:- 883.73 s - 111111•CONNECT TO 4 STUB (FIELD (FIELD VERIFY LOTION) CONNCAECT 50 EXIS9NG STUB 10.003.81 (FIELD VERIFY) 31' -6" PVC 0 0.405 S LONER WATERMAIN TO MAINTAIN 18" CLEARANCE BETWEEN PIPES (TYP) >4. s00 STUB IE -8 559, 0.29? IIT�- CoNS18uc8 631-- AS /�SSRUCO 1" 20'20' 1__ 2G SS-d���'''''' ���9997TT�'''���''�''��Y- �D7-�l -" I I \ SIXTH-101 \ RE -900,0 IE■890.05 X381' -42" RCP 0 0.1018 55. B " EMS 00 54' -42' RCP 0 0.105 01 Ha,R911T200s, HORTFOW ARQUPNO NC C75,1NU,RRR5n1N.RK.5 STORM SEWER - CONTINUED LAYOUT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 10 G 20 SUPPORT NET 12 GAUGE 4' x 4' WIRE HOOKED 0NT0 PREFORMED CHANNELS ON P05TS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUND- SURFACE FILTER FABRIC WRH WIRE ISUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. METAL POST Vr AS SPECIFIED. ,- FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TC win SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CLIPS 12'O.C. CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SOIL, TAMP BACKFILL DIRECTION OF ROW METAL POSTS 0-0" 0.C. MAX. WRAP 1/4" WIRE MESH AROUND 51005 OF 80X AND ATTACH TO FRAME. FILL WITH 1 /2"-5" DIAMETER WASHED STONE REPLACE WHEN SATURATED WITH SEDIMENT. CATCH BASIN FILTER DETAIL 1 NOT TO SCALE C4.D 284 WOOD FRAME COLLECTED SEDIMENT OUTSIDE CB INLET (LAWN AREAS) GRADE GRATE INLET FILTER BAG BETWEEN FRAM_ AND GRATE -4- EROSION CONTROL NOTES: -(P- 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEDIMENTATION AND ER090.1 CONTROL SYSTEMS AS SHOWN ON THE DRANANGS IN ADDITION TO OTHER MEASURES THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTMPES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE OTT ORDINANCE 2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. THIS MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE CLEANING AND /09 REPLACING SYSTEMS THAT HAVE BECOME CLOGGED OR NO LONGER FUNCTIONAL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT MONTHLY AND AFTER EACH STORM EVERT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO INSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND 5ATISFACTORY DISPOSAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK AND SOIL SIABIUZ4TION AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 30 L.F. OF SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE OUTLET OF EACH STORM DRAIN PIPE TO CONTROL AND MINIMIZE SILT RUNOFF, LEGEND: 419 420 22. -- _ + 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 5' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION SILT FENCE UNITS OF EROS10N CONTROL BLANKET OUTFALL GUTTER S.-GRADING NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AL50 BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK DF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO 114E ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO LOANING AND SODDING 40741505. • 2. UNSUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL. AS SPECIFIED, SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF -SITE. 3. SUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED CATCH BASIN INLET 54 A MANNER AND LOCATION AS APPROVED BY THE NOTE: ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 1) IN LAWN AREAS( USE MESH, W000 FRAME 50X, AND STONE FOR 4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK INLET PROTECTION (NO BAG REQUIRED) SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE 2) IN PAVED AREAS. USE FILTER BAC FOR INLET PROTECTION ( NO ARCHITECT. MESH, BOX STONE REOUIRED) T. MAP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4' DOWN FROM TRENCH 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND '9', OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. "0'ER0510N STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT,.' TRENCH ANC TAMPED..' 000BLEROW OF STAPLES, BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4' OR MORE IN DEPTH 'EOVERF49) PUCE STAPLES 2 FEET - APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO 5011. TIPICAL 88 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL }- STRUCTURE SCHEDULE: STRUCTURE SIZE 050090" 004 -1 Cr DIA R -1642 STINT -101 66" DIA R -1642 CBMH- 102 66" DIA. R- 3067 -0 099,44 -103 54" DIA 8- 3067 -0 0994 -108 48" 010 19- 3067 -0 - NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY OR APPROVED EQUAL n I 5. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOWAINE FINISHED GRADE EIPVATCINS. 6. LONGITUDINAL SLOPES OF WALKS SHALL BE 518 (MAX.) AND 1R (MIN.) AND 25 (MAX.) CROSS SLOPE EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON TIE DRAWINGS. 7. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 11 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL REQUIRE SURFACE ROUGHENING BY EITHER "504505TEP" GRADING. GROOVING. FURROWING, OR TRACKING TO AVOID RUNOFF VELOCITY AND RECEIVE EROSION CO4TROL BLANKET. SLOPES ass THAN 3:1 NOT ST4BWZE0 WITH VEGETATION SMALL HAVE THE SURFACE ROUGH GRADED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY UNTIL 50D HAS BECOME STABILE AN0 MATURE. AT ND TINE 149000HOUT THE DURATION OF 114E CONTRACT. SHALL SLOPES BE A SMOOTH GRADE OR A COMPACTED SURFACE. --- UTILITY NOTES: -OD- 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL fELG VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTUTIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS 2. ALL EXISTING UPON LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651- 454 -0002 OR 800- 252 -1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 72 HOURS PRIOR TO WNSTRUCPON. 3. UTILITY INSTALLATION SOW_ CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE UNE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION' AS PREPARED 8Y THE CITY ENGINEERS 955004110N OF MINNE50TA, AND SHAY CONFORM 9518 CITY REQUIREMENTS 4. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 5. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (OAP) CLASS 52 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6 ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVNYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) SOR 35 UNLESS 0THERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONRETE PIPE (RCP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 0. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER. OF STRUCTURES 9. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETA15. RN ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON 7195 PLAN DO NOT REFLECT WARPED ELEVATIONS. 10. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. It TYPICAL HYDRANT CONSISTS OF: HYDRANT, GATE VALVE, 2.5' OF 6" DIP W4TERMAIN AND ANY HYDRANT EXTENSION. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL 12. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REWIRED OVER ALL 991090AN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REWIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER UNES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAN IS INCIDENTAL. 13. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION 15 REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED. 14. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND 9265 WITHIN THE BUILDING WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. (5. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF NEW UTILITIES, IRRIGA5ON snit*, ANO UN008094INS WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 16 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN 05 -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD q7s • CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100 MN ..E741BMN0 BOER KW., Mt 952.7461700 x1-7461301 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 05/15/05 CRY 5U8NIRAL 09/27/05 REV P@ CITY 0 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: GRADING & U11LITY PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C30 NOTE: COVER FITTINGS WITH PLASTIC CONCRETE 102 TO POUR NG PLAN UNDISNRSOO SOIL 2500 P02 CONCRETE 20 DAY STRENGTH SECTION CONCRETE REACTION BACKING FOR BENDS DETAIL 1 NOT TO SCALE 111 mPTMG111 2004, 702,1090 GROUP NE. k¢ nRO710015 RFMNEE7UH0RERS 03.1 UNDISTURBED 501L PLAN UNDISTURBED SOIL ■0. PLAN CONCRETE REACTION BACKING FOR TEES DETAIL NOT TO SCALE INFI- SHIELD" - SEAL OR EQUAL. 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIDE. BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING & ANC MANHOLE. RN15H SMOOTH ON THE INSIDE NO MORTAR ON INSIDE. MANHOLE SLEEVE SEE DETAIL SECTION NOTE, COVER FITTINGS WITH POLYETHYLENE (44422.) PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE. 2500 P.S.I. CONCRETE 20 DAY STRENGTH RINGS (3 MAX.. 1' MAX OF RINGS & MORTAR). 6' PLAN _ M STAINLES STEEL STRAP 66 -} FLEXIBLE SLEEVE SECTION A -A MANHOLE SLEEVE NO WOOD SHALL BE USED FOR ADJUSTING CASINO, CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME k COCOA AS PER SPEOFTCAIMNS. ■ANNOE STEPS SHALL IS CAST MON. 20 213 OR STEEL REINFORCED PW IL RR �5C4Ta. STEP LOCATION SHALL BE AS NOTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. 7C CEP AND OVER TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT STEPS. PRECAST REINFORCED GNOME MANHOLE SECTIONS PER A510 C470. FURNISHED GENES M0 00 5220NT EXCEPT AS DTHERMSE SPECIFIED. A it OR IF BARREL SECTION SHALL BE INSTALLS/ 1MEIER TIE CORE WHENEVER POS46LG RUBBER CONNECTIONS BOOT AND ayENTN�w3. IIWM SURFACE WATER BE BY CAST FINISHED SMOOTH. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL NOT TO 72242 E 511002 FILTER awn, L0 COVER AS SPECIFIED WATERMAN SIZE VARIE57 B-0 CURB• 1�: ��+WMII =IIWM�IW 0"%6X16 CONC. BLOCK GATE VALVE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE RINCS (3 MIN., 1.0' MAX. OF RING5 & MORTAR). 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIDE, BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING & MANHOLE. FINISH 50200TH ON THE INSIDE. NO MORTAR ON INSIDEI PRECAST COVER SLAB (TYPE 2) 2 STRIPS BITUMASTIC SEAL ON SLAB JOINTS. NO CEMENT. INNTi•i111= Y -- illlM11111=p) GATE VALVE BOX GATE VALVE 1 1 /2" WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND. MIN.1 /3 C.Y. (MIN. I C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS 501L5) TIE RODS MNDOT 3733 TYPE 3 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIN. 1 LAYER ATTACH TO TOP OF BONNET "INFI- SHIELD" SEAL OR EQUAL. 3 NO 50000 SHALL BE USED FOR ADJLST/NG CASTING: meow MORTAR ONLY. CAST MON MANHOLE FRAME If COMER AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. u00IE STEPS SHALL BE CAS7 120X. ALUMMUN OR STEEL REINFORCED PUS71C PER ASV 076. LOCVRON SMALL BE AS NOM M THE SPECIRCAT0NS. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE NAM01E smarms k BASF 5UB PER A51.1 6479. S. SH PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS WOH 0 -980 OAPIEt5 k LMBRICAM EXCEPT OTIY0RWSE SPECIFIED A SECTION 2" OR SORREL SECTION SHALL BE MTAUED UNDER THE CONE WHENEVER POSSBLE. FXL OPENING BETWEEN PPE k MN 7911 WITH CEMENT HORROR. INSIDE SURFACE SHALL 8E FINISHED SMOOTH. STORM SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL 6 NOT TO SCALE PLAN cwww raw N.M.15V sc. law ()FP Pow 5Pa5Mr or soma Ha Or. vaa IS'. ®152 .v2. 02]601 ,�HiN• FNe: N < a aMracrw�A v at arw a T7.: a A apron) FM. 03.1 TABLE OF OUAINMES 1782F O< DAINTIES WRAP AT 800-0 OUTLETS a• BOXES OF 00452LENT SPAN I.P© O E.' tl5T CVSS Iu tl5P9' CLA55 v ay0"TZ DM. RI L LR) 72- De Faa Ca r4. r DwAY G 'Cv. . pth De Nr jp. r p Am. been W. Cvy Ta. 29 Depth ;C rIg..CFALV,I. 17 OW3 GronM 42 1 N 30 �b 4B 0 1� 1 16 20 36. 15 2 1,i B3 TLS 14 20 2.2 ¢9 41 B3 109 116 494 2.t 07 S5 3510 2.B 55 422..9 1782F O< DAINTIES WRAP AT 800-0 OUTLETS a• BOXES OF 00452LENT SPAN I.P© pr-- 3' wavy MA0a 9017 72 ma.,. oM R, tar pMNAaL R I ealaw9equC RM : ,7a parmaA FLARED END SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3/4" GALVANIZED STEEL TIE RODS OR "MEGA we BRAND THRUST RETAINER GLANDS AT JOINTS SEE STD. DWG. 203 ATERMAIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE & B Y 002205 Be OF 2' -6 VARIES CURB\ 24 PROP. LINE ce 8. WELD CONDUCTIVITY STUD T BELOW FLANGE (FOR LOCATION rPURPOSES) COVER AS SPECIFIED r000ltXTILE FABRIC MN007 3733 TYPE 3 CONCRETE BLOCK REACTION BACKING ApP 7108 41s CONCRETE BLOCK WATER HYDRANT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0117E0110N OF FLOW 4 C3.1 140 BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED CASTING AND ADJUSTMENT RINGS AS SPECIFIED. 24"x36 PRECAS DOGHOUSES SHALL BE (ROUTED ON BOTH THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. 1 1/2" WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND MIN. 1/3 C.Y. (MIN. 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS SOILS.) GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW GUTTER GRADE. 10' xi TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCHBASIN. 4' MAX I SECTION STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN DETAIL 3" GROUT NOT TO SCALE 0 :.E- FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARatfECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD EMMZEM CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 22E00SORRETNER UNE EDEN FRAME, NN S2.74M1Ix0 99- 746.2201 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 08 /I0/05 CRY SUBMITTAL 09/77/05 REV PER CITY U REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: UTIUTY DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: C3.1 • • • • CORM R a SO`r Oast M a5O"r Clam N /1,T? Spa, Pl. (tt L (P1) DP qWn CpC.}CU n WA 1ST DN. CY"C '' T."MerTJCv 11E Dept, .MUR OWppnn d tl 22 20 Ja SB ID 12 14 1 il O.B .0 ].2 122 2.0 18 i.6 8 5.0 0 0O 490 iI 5.2. BS 10.0 lea RSi 5.5 T.2 13] pr-- 3' wavy MA0a 9017 72 ma.,. oM R, tar pMNAaL R I ealaw9equC RM : ,7a parmaA FLARED END SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3/4" GALVANIZED STEEL TIE RODS OR "MEGA we BRAND THRUST RETAINER GLANDS AT JOINTS SEE STD. DWG. 203 ATERMAIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE & B Y 002205 Be OF 2' -6 VARIES CURB\ 24 PROP. LINE ce 8. WELD CONDUCTIVITY STUD T BELOW FLANGE (FOR LOCATION rPURPOSES) COVER AS SPECIFIED r000ltXTILE FABRIC MN007 3733 TYPE 3 CONCRETE BLOCK REACTION BACKING ApP 7108 41s CONCRETE BLOCK WATER HYDRANT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0117E0110N OF FLOW 4 C3.1 140 BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED CASTING AND ADJUSTMENT RINGS AS SPECIFIED. 24"x36 PRECAS DOGHOUSES SHALL BE (ROUTED ON BOTH THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. 1 1/2" WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND MIN. 1/3 C.Y. (MIN. 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS SOILS.) GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW GUTTER GRADE. 10' xi TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCHBASIN. 4' MAX I SECTION STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN DETAIL 3" GROUT NOT TO SCALE 0 :.E- FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARatfECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD EMMZEM CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 22E00SORRETNER UNE EDEN FRAME, NN S2.74M1Ix0 99- 746.2201 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 08 /I0/05 CRY SUBMITTAL 09/77/05 REV PER CITY U REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: UTIUTY DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: C3.1 • • • • (ltlG ➢inalt.fyl� CONCRETE CURB LANDSCAPE MEDIAN - OVERSIORY. MID - STORY, AND UNDER STORY PLANTINGS - NUMBERS OF PLANTS IS DICTATED 131 S.F. OF MEGAN. BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT TYPICAL PARKING LOT ISLAND SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE W) mFMGK12005, MPITFO10400"®N& ei P.PLOELIWBZIMEEMHAKIKAS D 0 20 Tf4REE TIMES WIDTH - 1 OF ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE T -maim�I�I 11 II �I��II fl�t REE TIMES WIDTH REEN OOTB PLANTING DETAIL PRUNE AS FIELD DRECTEO BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE YX4'X6' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120' TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1' -2" ABOVE EXISRNO GRADE 4' SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH 2" FROM TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL IF NON- BIODEGRADABLE. REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACKELL AS SPECIFIED 00 NOT EXCAVATE BELOW FOOTBALL PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2 X4"XB' WOODEN STAKES. STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED ,—BROWN TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120 TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1" -Y ABOVE EXISTING GRADE 3 SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH 2' 84109 TRUNK EXI5TING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IF NON - BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE 51005 OF HOLE BACKFILL 45 5PEOFIED DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW FOOTBALL NOT TO 5CA1E REE TIMES WID H OF ROOTBALL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 4— LANDSCAPING NOTES: --(0- 1. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTWTE5 SHALL RECEIVE 4' MIN. LAYER LOAM AND WASHED 50D AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. AREAS WITHIN STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL RECEIVE LOA! AND 50D IWTH1N 72 HOURS OF F1NAL GRADING. SEE 50D INSTALLATION NOTES BELOW. 2. LOCATIONS OF DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. AND STAKED IN 141E FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE BALLED AND BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP. 4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4' LAYER OF SHREDDED CYPRU55 OR CEDAR MULCH ON TOP OF A NON - BIODEGRADABLE F2.TER FABRIC AND BORDERED 88150 3/16' THICK 07001 OR ALUMINUM EDGING. 5. RAINGARDEN AND INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE WETLAND SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED. - IF APPUCABLE. B. ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY RRIGATEO. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4- SODDING INSTALLATION: -4- 1. THE LOAM AND SOIL SHALL BE 4" LAYER MINIMUM, LOOSENED. AND FREE OF CLODS, ROCKS. AND DEBRIS. 2. AREAS TO RECEIVE 50D SHALL BE FERTILIZED WITH 25 POUNDS PER 1000 SO.FT. (1000 18 /AC) OF 10 -10 -10 Fa9RT4UZER AND WORKED INTO THE TOPSOIL 3. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DAMPENED PRIOR TO CAWING THE 50D. JOINTS IN THE SOD SHALL BE STAGGERED, AND THE EDGES BUTTED 107000ER 8GHTLY TO AVOID GAPS BETWEEN 50D LENGTHS 4. 50D INSTALLED ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER, OR IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOWS, SHALL BE STAKED IN PLACE INSTALL THE SOD WITH THE LENGTH PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATER FLOW FOR SLOPES 50114 SHEET FLOW. 5. AFTER INSTALLATION, AREAS SHALL BE TAMPED OR ROLLED 10 PROWOE GOOD CONTACT BETWEEN 50D AND SOIL AFTER ROLLING, THE 50D SHOULD BE WATERED 50 NAT THE SOIL IS MOISTENED 4 INCHES BELOW THE 50D. 4}— SODDING MAINTENANCE: --4)- 4. IN THE ABSENCE OF A0EDUAIE RAINFALL. WATER DURING THE 30 DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING 500 PLACEMENT TO KEEP SOIL MOIST. FOLLOWING T1415 INITIAL 30 DAY ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, WATER AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE MOISTURE IN THE ROOT ZONE 2. WHERE MOWING 15 DESIRED, MAINTAIN CRASS HEIGHT OF 31NCHE5 AND SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED UNTIL THE SOD 15 FIRMLY ROOTED, USUALLY TWO TO TFR0F WEEKS AFTER SOD 15 LAID. 3. INSPECT AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW ANNUALLY AND FOLLOWING INTENSE STORMS. MAKE NEEDED REPAIR AND REVECETATE PROMPTLY. .4— SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS: —0} 4. TEMPORARY SEEDING TO BE 100% ANNUAL RYE GRASS AND TO BE INSTALLED WHIN 48 HOURS OF LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THIS APPLYS 10 ALL AREAS 200 5F OR GREATER WHICH. THIS 15 TO BE MAINTAINED ONLY AS A TEMPORARY CONDITION. THE FINAL CONDITION OF ALL LAWN AREAS AND ALL AREAS NOT TO R001040 80410840, PAVING OR LANDSCAPE. HALL BE 50D. PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE) PLANT TOP OF FOOTBALL R -Y ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 4' SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH D0 NOT BURY STEMS OR TRUNK EXISTING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF RODTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER SACKFUL -TO -ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE - — BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DD NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. 'D' PLANTING SCHEDULE 9 OTT. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME _ DECIDUOUS TREES ROOT SIZE r COMMENTS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLEACer SACCHARIN 'Green Mountain' B &8 2 1/2" CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM CM NS occIdenO06s - HAOK8ERRY SUNBURST HONEY LOCUST B &B 2 1/2" CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM - Oediteio Tr1OCantnos Var. Inermis '5Mncoie' B &B 2 1/2" CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM Fr0Ainus oennovNanico 'Ruabv - PRAIRIE SPIRE ASH B &B 2 1/2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -8011 FORM - OREENERIRE LINDEN Tilio cordate 'Green50ire' B &B 2 1/2' CAL. 01RAICHT LEADER -FULL FORM IFERIOUS TREES RED PINE - EASTERN RED CEDAR Pintos pungens Juniperu Rininno B &B e' HT. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM B&B 8' HT STRAIGHT LEADER -RILL FORM ORNAMENTAL 1RE00 SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE - JAPANESE TREE LILAC - PAGODA DOGWOOD Molds '51TrAla Sao.' 5yinao reticulato Corms altemifolio - PAPER BIRCH Betula poperilerc B&B t 1/2" CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM B &B 1 1/2" CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM B &8 1 1 /2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -MULTI -STEM B &8 1 1/2' CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER - MULTI -STEM 000400005 SHRUBS COMPACT NM RHODODENDRON Rhoactaa ercn 'P.J.M. Compact' IVORY 14410 DOGWOOD - LITTLE PRINCESS SPIRAEA - COMPACT BURNING BUSH - 91.1541 HONEYSUCKLE JAPANESE 5PIREA CONIFERI0U5 SHRUBS Gornto alba 'Bo8halo' 5olraea iman a 'Llltle Princess' Myy alols 'COM000145' wMa ionmero Saimaa japonica 'Neon Rosh' CONT. 36" 411. CONT. 31" HT CONT. 1E" HT. DENS, RR4NCN -SPACE 4' 0.0. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0.0. CONT. 36" 411. CONT. 24" HT. CONY. 24" HT. DEN BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0.C. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0.C. DENT' BRANCH -SPACE 4' OC. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0.0 TECHNY ARBORIVITAE - NUGHD SLOWMOUND - GOLDEN 800081VITAE - DWARF BLUE GLOBE SPRUCE Tnuia occidentolis '"ecnnv. P 000,8050 '90.0189,0' Tnulo 08.440 n10115 [urea Picea Puneens 'Globose' CONT. 6' HT. CONT. 36" HT. DOHT. 30" HT. CONT. 36" HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 5' O.C. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' O.C. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0.C. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' OC. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 10 W NM,LETREE LAIR EnENPANNE,NN 952446.00 011 1 00 54}1161201 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WOODS EDGE HOTEL PROJECT LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: OS/ t5/00 CITY SUBMITTAL 08/27/05 CITY SUBMITTAL LI REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.0 • • • • r-s• I 3. UA lit10 T5%. PAIR 4 '-0.34'-e CHAIN LINK GATE ./ SLATS ! REFUSE t ' 0 ■-.47- .71; RECYCLIN6 ! « •Ix1 POSTS n-rp. LINE 0P i T-0 pr-o• El g REFUSE 'ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE 1/1. ?-0. FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE V fr 1141 S.F. OF GUEST ROOMS 1,944 S.F. OF COMMON AREAS 15485 S.F. OF TOTAL AREA OF FIRST FLOOR •X' 'UMW WO • I •1111116. - - • NL11.911111 1111111.rkk • •AXIMINIMIXIM 111:MI• AIMEE Ininummual mairsomus•in •1111M•••1IX6 •"112M•UI •muni •,+1i •01•91•MINLAX 1•111111••••.1141 ••101111 uuHuml • MI Inn • ••••=1•••1111 •IKIIIEM111.••11 EIAXEMIN••111ff 11110•14••••11111 1:3131M110114111•11511111 IFrun AMOIX Mein BrallfiliEFX/M =115! LEIIIIRMIE1111111P IMIKALICIENOIN MUM • MEI MN ••=5.•F1•• IrnwI INXIMMI:1•10 11••IP61••••11 IIIMUMM+11• 11X.WICE•XXI• •111PM11•1163011• 1111110WAIMNIX ramea [imams mmownem •••Im•IdiCEI •••T4611111EX•• ••111=1111Ril•• 11••=••••• ff-mr-unrie ••••1111111111•11 111•••••••••• IMINIMEIMMI•11• 111111MMIKX11114% IIMMINKAVIM41 1•EMEITIMIn 111111•11 MEM 1•1111111tgaZOI BMW -MIMI 011•1011111,1 111111•11111 ne misr-4. Am= MIUM•111••• Mr7MEr1111111F1 RAIFEL.11111111■111 ••••••••11 •IIMMIIIWAG411X NUMF7AU=1" NIMEZEI•odLink• • ICAMINLIN• ••IElaI••LLU• IMIP1111/24. IBM RIONCIITJ•10111R• IIIRPErmilia111311 • '-'111111 •1•Mika1•ZXIII• • •• -116:11•1111111:2• Mri-111.* 121M• •ms=nrmill 1111•111X•ii E•11•11111••••• • •1•1 IRE • • ummon.• IMEIMIL1111M•l• •MIP7AWNIMINIM •MMINUPPIX•11W21 ••11 Pad •• !MAI •••,11111.1.V.11•111 mun -sArk-gium EXIENTEMIltral IMEN041,111121T11 In•-•"1.•-111M11 IiI ME PM I UUI Ml• IglialtAll1111111 1.110117-4DIP_H.1 Mal • ii.„1,A RIM • NMI AIM • IrXIMMII711. -WM 11111:13201M•M• 11111511M-11.71•11• =•I•E• 1131=21111M•MX • ER•EN• 11•1•1111•11•••• • Mal ME• • •111111•••••• f•MACWIMIE• •MILIVI/4011•11• NI•r•111•• 1 • • • CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT 240= 3 TAB OWENS CORNING CHATEAU GREEN ASPHALT SHINGLES PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. VENTED SOFFIT PROVIDE PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS U OVER 2210 WOOD FASCIA WHITE PREFINISHED ALUM. WRAP (TYP.) E.I.F.S. QUOINS ANTIQUE PARCHMENT IN COLOR METAL BLACK VALLEY FLASHING (TO EXTEND I8" TO EACH SIDE OF VALLEY TYP.) E.I.F.S. •CULTURED BRICK NOTE, PAINT ALL PLASTIC AND SHEET METAL VENTS ON ROOF FLACK 2,8 DECORATIVE WOOD GAELE TRIM WRAPPED E/ WHITE_ PREFINISHED ALUMINUM PROVIDE ALT. BID FOR WHITE VINYL TRIM 281,54' PREFINISHED WHITE LOUVER E/ CIRCLE TOP cOOP PEK ELEV_ 111 -OA" GABLE TRUSS BF ROOFVTRUES B ELEV. 130-4 1. E.I .F.S. — TAN IN COLOR THIRD FIN. ELEV. 122' -3 3. FL. TRUSS EF ELEV. i20'" METAL MECH. COVER — 4" .1.1 =.E. — WINDOW E TRIM ALL WINDOWS TO HAVE WHITE - FINISH • • • E.I.F.S. TAN IN COLOR WINDOW TRIM TO PROVIDE 2" MIN. REVEAL PROVIDE PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS NOTE, FAINT ALL PLASTIC AND 51-IEET METAL VENTS ON ROOF BLACK METAL. BLACK VALLEY FLASHING (TO EXTEND 18• TO EACH SIDE OF VALLEY TYP.> ]III +. IN CULTURED BRICK CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT 240= 3 TAB OWE_NS CORNING CHATEAU GREEN ASPHALT SHINGLES PREFINISHED WHITE ALUM. VENTED SOFFIT bd. OVER 2•10 WOOD FASCIA u 2 / WHITE REFINISHED ALUM. WRAF (TYP.) E.I.F 5. QUOINS PRE FINISHED WHITE VINYL —' RAILINGS AND BALUSTERS PROVIDE GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS ENTRY PORCH — CULTURED STONE - FIELD DRESSED *CHARDONNAY" PROVIDE GUTTERS e ND DOWNSPOUTS PORCH ORCH e ENTRY CANOPY ROOF PEAK ELEV. 144' -C' GABLE TRUSS SRC:. ROOF TRUSS BRG. ELEV. 130' -4 1/8" THIR• FIN. FL ELEV. I22'-3 3/4" FL. TRUSS R . ELEV. 120' -3' CANOPY TRUSS BRG.- _LE V. 11>' -L" PO C USS EL V. 108' -1 I /8' NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: I /8" • 1' -O' FIN. FLOOR LCV. 106' -O" -AST ELEVATION SCALE: (/8" - I' -0" SEP 2OO5 cry r> 91\1C K S SECOND FIN. ELEV . FL TRu111150.5217-11511f. ELEV. FIN, PLO ELEV. (00'- I 1 I ■■■c.■ PLO1lED: 09 -15-05 FILE. 0513785 alw�■ 7 v■■uuu■uu■i■■u M 1M■■c■Jv2mEM9KMA■■■■IwZ • ■∎••■■ r . C7■ LA ' 1� ■■MM■r■■■■■■■■■■M ■ 1MMEA ■ "".A ■II.J, 111111•1111 ■u■u■■ ■■ ■IEWPERI!II!I■Iritli[iMI■ ■■ r ��r• ■•r.Uu ■�! u■■■■■■ ■ ■uu ∎Ee° .r•EZii>r -, T;1rllr■!ITPrfIP MMEAUM ■■■■■I - mmww-�_- Ill L Rdl - JTi.'•I ■■■■■ MIMIMM MUMU i!■■■■■ii3ii - . --i, 9 iT-,C=2117■u�!■■l�J..Jt •■ ■ ■u■■��Il ■■■ ■rO�■■■_ ■��n��tal ■■■ -I. iMINAMM /: ■s■e■■■■u■ ■■■■■■■■miAmm [IIIIDNM M1 ■urn Ou■■ �Ou■■i■i■■■ii■i■i UffiQ vittEU ■I■w[uulw■■u■!I[I��■ �■[lu M g■ VAEUMrAIM■■■iPO■MEM ■ ■■■� PIMMI ■� �■ -• ∎■ ■■ WWWW4 ■■ u..w mirniR►iimmni r iiWW II MM! Mw■■■■■■■■NEEPl ammum ■ ■ iiI'PPs''r;w2U 7■■■■ u■■ ■uv■■■■■■ ■E ■ ■ u■■f. ■fMYH■■MI ■VIMMEG* ■u�■[�Ys4111.1►!II11.:y1 NID. u ■ ■9�3►t1:21�' >l omens llr 1/.719r1r- ■■■ **** �F^- ➢NN[R iiiir�7■..■■■■ EIT�I ■ ■■■ ■MEWSIML!■■■io„= iiiii■ IANYiEiBifi■IiYi ■fiiiiiiiOliMu IIMMMEMEMMEMMEEMPWfiMMIMMAMPMPARIMMMEMMUMMUMEMEM ■ IlCy9J► J■ FiiimwiJNflii ■iiiliil ■i7 ■:i ;.naiiroau■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ilmm u■ ■■■uEMMSMfills■SMOPU iASIVIMAu■■E■■■■ ■��■ ■u■ • • • • • AGENDA ITEM V.B.2 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: October 12, 2005 TOPIC: Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit Final Plan Betty's Pies Legacy at Woods Edge BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a single tenant restaurant within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the restaurant building as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). SBetty's Pies is a full service restaurant that meets the intent of the city's vision for a family oriented, neighborhood gathering place in the new mixed use downtown. Owners Marti Sieber and Carl Ehlenz run the Two Harbors, Minnesota, destination restaurant and this will be their first expansion into the metro area. The overall area of the building will be 7,935 square feet. The majority of the building itself is single story, with the exception of an office area which is located over the center section of the building. The Planning and Zoning Board continued this item at the September 14th regular meeting, and offered up comments to both staff and the developer about the proposal. Numerous revisions have been made to the plans and are addressed throughout this report. ANALYSIS Governing Plans This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit Development for the site. The layout generally follows the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout, with the exception of the combination of lots 3, 4, and 5 to create two lots. The main entry of the building will be from the parking lot, which is •atypical for this type of urban development. However, the plaza that is being proposed in combination with the outdoor dining area and the walkway from the street into the site has been determined to sufficiently act as an Betty's Pies, page 2 `entry point' for both this restaurant and the building that will be built on the adjacent lot to the east. The •pplicant has been informed by staff that the continuation of the plaza as shown on these plans will need to occur on the adjacent lot, and that the location of the main entrance away from the street right -of -way will not be something that is allowed in other locations within the development. The proposed Betty's Pies building is located in a Commercial Land Use Area and takes up both lot 3 and part of lot 4 in Block A (according to the land use plan of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide). Acceptable Building Type is Commercial with a minimum number of floors for all uses of one and a maximum of 3. The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates a build -to line for this portion of that block which will require that the building be close to the edge of the street to create an intimate pedestrian environment. The Regulating Plan does not indicate any `Required Building Entries' on this site, nor any `Gateways'. Allowable Uses The proposed use for this site is a family -style restaurant. The Lino Lakes Town Center Development & Design Guide classifies this use as `Eating Places / Restaurants / Private Clubs and Lodges' and considers it a permissible use within the Commercial District. The applicable section is included below: SECTION 3.1 ALLOWABLE USES ,able 1. Allowable Land Uses in Mixed -Use Commercial, Commercial Residential and Civic Districts • Allowable Land Use Comm ercial Mixed Use Civic Commercial Uses Eating places /restaurants /private clubs and lodges: • With outdoor seating areas [4] [6] • With drive - through or drive -up facilities [5] • With entertainment, bar or cocktail lounge at least 50 feet from the Residential District. [2] P C C A P C - A - - - - TABLE 1 NOTES: P = permitted use. C = conditional use. (See Appendix A for Conditions of Use) A = accessory to permitted or conditional use [2] Establishments that serve alcohol, and /or feature amplified music are conditionally permitted as an accessory use to restaurants subject to City Code requirements if they are at least 50 feet from the Residential District [4] Outdoor seating may occur between buildings and within allowable building setbacks (see Table 3). Outdoor seating may also occur on sidewalks within street rights -of -way, provided that there is a clear passage for pedestrian movement that is at least 6 feet in width. [5] Refer to the diagram on page 20 for guidance on siting drive - throughs. [6] The City may set limits on hours of operation to avoid nuisance issues. The applicant is also proposing to have outdoor seating areas as a part of their business. Restaurants with outdoor seating areas are listed as a Conditional Use within the Commercial District. Conditions for the proposed use are in Appendix A of the Design and Development Guide, and include the following: Eating Places /Outdoor Restaurants, Clubs and Lodges: • • Betty's Pies, page 3 1. Accessory outdoor seating areas: a. The applicant shall submit a site plan and other pertinent information demonstrating the location and type of all tables, refuse receptacles, and wait stations. b. Access to the dining area shall be provided only via the principal building if the dining area is full service restaurant, including table waiting service. c. The size of the dining area is restricted to thirty (30) percent of the total customer floor area within the principal structure. d. All lighting shall be hooded and directed away from adjacent residential uses in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4. F of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. e. The applicant shall demonstrate that pedestrian circulation is not disrupted as a result of the outdoor dining area by providing the following: 1) Outdoor dining area shall be segregated from through pedestrian circulation by means of fencing, bollards, ropes, plantings, or other methods, and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 2) Minimum clear passage zone for pedestrians at the perimeter of the restaurant shall be at least six (6) feet without interference from parked motor vehicles, bollards, trees, tree gates, curbs, stairways, trash receptacles, street lights, parking meters, or the like. 3) Overstory canopy of trees, umbrellas or other structures extending into the pedestrian clear passage zone or pedestrian aisle shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7) feet above sidewalk. f. The dining area shall be surfaced with concrete, bituminous or decorative pavers or may consist of a deck with wood or other flooring material that provides a clean, attractive, and functional surface. g. A minimum width of thirty -six (36) inches shall be provided within aisles of the outdoor dining area. h. Storage of furniture shall not be permitted outdoors between November 1 and March 31. Outdoor furniture that is immovable or permanently fixed or attached to the sidewalk shall not be subject to the storage prohibition of this section. However, any immovable or permanently fixed or attached furniture must be approved as part of the administrative permit application. i. Refuse containers shall be provided for self - service outdoor dining areas. Such containers shall be placed in a manner which does not disrupt pedestrian circulation, and must be designed to prevent spillage and blowing litter. Staff has reviewed the application for the Conditional Use Permit in regards to the conditions above and the proposed use can clearly meet all of the conditions as is proposed. Attached to the report is an exhibit depicting the outdoor dining area layout. Building Massing & Placement The proposed building is within a portion of the development that requires build -to lines, specifically for this site a maximum 5 foot setback is prescribed and is being substantially met with this proposal. The only section of the building that does not specifically meet the 5 foot maximum setback is the portion of the site designated for outdoor dining and plaza. This meets the standards of the build to line which require a minimum of 70% of he block to meet the build -to lines, and up to 20% can be plaza/park areas. Betty's Pies, page 4 *long the build -to line the building is also required to have a minimum height of 20 feet. The proposed elevations depict the parapet walls (the lowest point) at a height of 20 feet, with additional height being supplied to the structure thanks to the retaining wall on the street side of the site. The height of the building never exceeds 40 feet, even when measured from the base of the retaining wall to the very peak of the highest roof. Architectural Standards The relationship between the building and the street is required to be accentuated by expressive wall faces, with a minimum of 60% of the wall face being windows, doors, or arcades. The proposed elevations meet or exceed all of those requirements. Due to the grade differences of the site and the adjacent sidewalk, as well as the location of parking for the property, the primary building entry is being placed on the parking lot side of the building. While this does not specifically meet the standards of the guidelines, the location of the outdoor dining as well as the design of the connecting walkway /plaza creates an entry feature not only for this building, but also for the adjacent building and the entire interior of the block. The tower elements proposed for the building clearly accentuate the two main public entrances for the restaurant. Due to the grade differences between the site and the pedestrian streetscape, the scale of the building is slightly exaggerated; however the revised plans address this separation between the streetscape and the building with Ipuilding fenestrations; the integration of the retaining wall into the structure itself; and the outdoor dining area/plaza entry feature. The base of the structure is clearly articulated through the use of a stone veneer applied at a variety of heights ranging from 1 foot to almost 16 feet when integrated into the retaining wall portion on the southwest corner of the building. The top is also clearly articulated with the use of bracketing below all areas proposed with roofs above; with the parapet element that mimics the accentuation of the cementitious wall board banding below the roof lines (Though this parapet element is slightly understated in mass it is appropriately integrated into the overall scale of the building); and with the stepping effect that is created by the use of both standard angled roofing as well as parapet walls above flat roofing. The parapet walls will also provide an adequate screening device for the roof mounted equipment that will be required for this type of use. The building materials proposed for the site include stone and brick veneers; cementitious wall board or E.I.F.S., and a prefabricated metal roofing material. All of these materials meet the stringent standards of the design guidelines, and are incorporated consistently throughout the building's elevations. The proposed structure has integrated a couple of climatic response devices that meet the design guidelines. Daylighting of the interior space is being achieved through the large number of windows provided, and is accentuated by the clerestory windows that surround the main dining area. Patrons of the establishment will also be offered shelter from the elements in the entry vestibules while waiting to be seated and the provision of •hade umbrellas within the outdoor dining area. Betty's Pies, page 5 •he building integrates all of the necessary service areas into the building including the trash handling area, which is accessed through a roll up door on the north side of the northeast corner of the building. Parking Requirements Single Use Peak Hour Demand Net Floor Area (90% of G.F.A.) Parking Required Parking Provided Surplus 8 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 7,142 s.f. 64 93 29 Per Chapter 3.5 of the guidelines, the City is maintaining a shared parking analysis for the entire development. This analysis identifies peak parking demands at key times throughout the day. In the case of a restaurant the peak periods are identified as 8 PM on both weekdays and weekends. Betty's Pies Single Use Peak Hour Demand Parking Peak (8 PM Weekdays and Weekends) Parking Provided Surplus 8 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 57 93 36 The proposed use is clearly being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout that the applicant has proposed with this application. ntire Block Single Use Peak Hour Demand Parking Peak (1 PM Weekdays) Parking Provided Surplus Varies 402 405 3 The shared parking spreadsheet has been adjusted to match the proposed building layout for this entire block, specifically the buildings for lots 3, 4, and 5 have been adjusted to reflect only two users. The shared parking spreadsheet is based on the Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking Standards and as is required by the Development and Design Guidelines. As always, staff will continue to review each project to maintain the parking standards within this block as well as the entire development. Staff has included a condition requiring that the developer work with staff to identify an appropriate location for bicycle parking facilities on this block. Landscaping Requirements The submitted plans meet all of the landscaping requirements of Chapter 3.6, including the number of Parking Lot Trees, the height of retaining walls, and the design of the connecting walkway between the main entrance and the street right -of -way. As previously mentioned in the Parking section of the report, the site plan indicates a total of 93 parking spaces. This means that the 12 trees provided throughout the lot exceeds the requirement of 1 tree for every 10 parking spaces. The parking lot does not abut any public streets, so no additional landscaping buffer is required in that regard. The overall plan for this block will include roughly 288 parking spaces, which does not meet or exceed the threshold of 300 spaces which would require the implementation of connecting walkways throughout the •arking lot. Betty's Pies, page 6 110Che plaza entry provided from the Town Center Parkway streetscape adequately functions as a `connecting walkway' to the main entry of the building. This connecting walkway exceeds the six foot width requirement; is to be constructed out of decorative pavement; and will be planted with shade trees spaced 25 feet on center. The lighting will be built directly into the steps leading from the streetscape to the plaza, and with a decorative light fixture matching the city's fixtures for the streetscape. All of the landscaping materials proposed as a part of the planting palette for the site satisfy the comments of the Environmental Board as well as city staff. Lighting The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. The parking lot fixtures do not meet city standards and are being conditioned to be replaced by shoebox fixtures. The parking lot lighting that will be used for this phase of development must be repeated throughout this block, if not throughout the entire Legacy at Woods Edge project area. The building itself will include some architectural and building entry lights mounted directly to the building. These fixtures will be used to highlight the building massing and will enhance the pedestrian environment. Additionally, as was discussed in the landscape section of the report, a decorative lighting fixture is indicated within the plaza entry area on the southeast corner of the site. En ineerin The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and a memorandum including all of their comments is attached to the report. Any outstanding issues will be addressed through the site performance agreement and building permit process prior to construction. Final Plat The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) is attached to the same agenda as a separate item, and a condition will be added to this review that the final plat must be approved prior to City Council approval for this building. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 3l regular meeting. Their comments are attached and are addressed in the landscaping portion of this report. OPTIONS 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit and Final Plan for Betty's Pies 2. Deny the Conditional Use Permit, and Approve the Final Plan for Betty's Pies 3. Deny the Conditional Use Permit and Final Plan for Betty's Pies 4. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION • Betty's Pies, page 7 The submitted plans are in substantial conformance with the standards of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Final Plan for Betty's Pies, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The `gull wing' fixture (type EE and EE1 as shown on sheet C4.1) shall be changed to a shoebox fixture. This fixture type will need to be approved by staff and used throughout the rest of the parking area on this block, if not the rest of the project site. 5. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 6. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. ATTACHMENTS • 1. S.E.H. memorandum dated October 6, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Betty's Pies plan set received September 27, 2005. 4. Betty's Pies outdoor dining area — site plan received October 5, 2005. 1 • Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board August 31, 2005 Legacy at Woods Edge Bettvs Pies: Plant Schedule: Deciduous Trees list has two species that should be reconsidered for change. Crimson King maple is a Norway maple and of borderline hardiness. Norway maples are also listed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as invasive to our native woodlands. Suggest changing this species to one of the following -- Northern Pin Oak, Red Oak, Bur Oak, Autumn Blaze Maple, Hackberry, American Linden, and Green Ash. The Autumn Flame clump Maple is also a woodland invader and is getting established in some of our native woodlands. Amelanchier or Service berry, Ironwood, any of the disease resistant, fruit persistent flowering crabs, might be substituted for this species. Erosion Control: The developer should submit an erosion control plan that details NPDES requirements and is acceptable to the City. The plan and inspections reports for this plan must be located on site with an indicated location on the plan. SEH October 6, 2005 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Betty's Pies Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.09 14.00 Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Betty's Pies site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on October 2, 2005. Erosion Control and Grading Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. It appears that a large portion of the sidewalk on the north side of the building has cross slopes exceeding 2.0 %. These slopes exceed the maximum cross slope of 2% as . set forth in ADA Accessibility Guidelines. Utility Plan (Sheet C4.0) 1. The rim on STMH 101 appears low. Verify this rim elevation is correct. 2. No information is shown for the grading of the ECS Drainage System. This information must be shown on the plans. 3. The cover over the 12" HDPE pipe from STMH 101 to the ECS Drainage System is inadequate along some of its length near the outlet. As shown, less than one foot of cover will be provided over the top of the pipe. The full pavement section of 4" of bituminous and 8" of class 5 aggregate must be maintained over the pipe. Insulation or the pipe itself should not impact the pavement section. 4. Roof drains are shown on the plan with a note indicating roof storage is to be used for rate control and reference the architectural plans. The architectural plans show the roof drains but do not indicate how rate control will be maintained, and refer to the mechanical drawings which were not provided. The usage of roof storage to hold runoff from a 2.5" storm event was one component of the hydrology model submitted to and approved by Rice Creek Watershed District and is an integral part of the hydrologic design submitted by Hartford in this submittal. Without roof storage, the central pond/infiltration basin, as currently shown, will be undersized. Roof storage and rate control for a 2.5" storm event must be utilized on this building consistent with the hydrology model originally approved by Rice Creek Watershed District. Information describing how this will be done must be submitted for review. 5. The locations and elevations of the sanitary and water main stubs on the west side of the building have been revised as a part of the construction of Town Center Parkway. SEH will provide these locations and elevations so the plans can be revised. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite B, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax Mr. Michael Grochala October 6, 2005 Page 2 6. If the future buildings north of Betty's Pies, around the central parking lot, are planned to be served by the internal water main loop, a 8" cross and gate valve should be provided. in place of the 8" tee north of Betty's Pies so that a complete loop can be made around the central parking lot. As currently shown, a loop will only run from Town Center Parkway to Village Drive through the southern side of the central parking lot. Please call me at 651.765.2912 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Stefan T. Higgins, PE Project Engineer x: ko \linol`030509\pIan review \bcttyspics100605 - cnginccring.doc M • ABBREVIATIONS AC. 8000770 407. ACOUSTIC 114.0 471 ADJACENT OR ADJUSTABLE AF.F. ABOVE FINISHED MOOR NLN. ALUMINUM N.T. ALTERNATE AT AP. ACCESS HANEL ARCH. ARCHITECT O AT BD. BOARD BLDG. BUILDING BLX. BLOCK BLDG. BLOCKING B M. BOTTOM CA CASINO CAB. CABINET CFM. CEMENT CER. CERAMIC C.I. CAST IRON CAL. COUNT EL CLOSET COL COLUMN CONC. CONCRETE COAST. CONSTRUCTION CONT. CON7IN000S CONT. CONTRACTOR CORR. CORRIDOR CPT. CARPET CR. CARD READER C.T. CERAMIC TILE O.W. CASEWORK. P ET. DETAIL DNA. DIMENSION DR. DOOR ON. DISH WASHER ONCE. DRAWINGS EA. EACH EL. ELEVATION ELEV. ELEVATOR ELEC. ELECTRICAL NCR. ENGINEER ENT. ENTRANCE E0. ECJAL EOUIP. EOVIPMENT EXIST EXISTING EXP. EXPOSED OR EXPANSION EXT. 8 EX W /80 070000 EXHAUST IV/MC F f.E GA GRLV. 00. GYP. MCP. RM. R00R BRAD! FINISH FLOOR ELEVATOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIXTURE FURNACE GALVAN40 CROSS WEIGHT 0•P5UM HOLLOW CORE HANDICAP HAR01000 XOLLOR METAL HR. OUROMAL 6C INTERNATIONAL 7010)50 CODE rm. WW1. INSULATION STOUGT INT. 101ER1011 SV. JANITOR TAG JST. JOIST T.O. Jr. 10841 T.P. 06 M. KICK DOWN TUB I.A.V. 14001004 T.Y. LW. UNEN CLOSET 1YP YIN. 441347610400 080 LONUT. MANUFACTURER USO ' IM014404 V.C.T. RECH. MECHANICAL Y.B. 14E0. CAB. IMMUNE CABINET Vim. MFR. MANUFACTURER VEST. NW. MINGIU9 V.W.C. Y.O. MASONRY OPENI10 VIA/05. MIL METH- W.C. 84.C. NOT IN CONTRACT TO 1.TS. NOT TO SCALE M. NUMBER NOM. 80014LAt O.C. ON CENTER 0.0. OUTSIDE OMMETE7 O.X. OPPOSITE HAND P.C. PRECAST PL PLATE ALVA P114 C LAMINATE PT PAINT OR POINT O.T. OUARR7 TILE R RADIALS REF. REFERENCE OR REFRIGERATOR KM REFLECTED REFAT1. R574F. REV. REO'0 R.D. S.C. . SECT. SAT. 511*. 5 w/D SPED. MATERIALS + SYMBOLS W/ w/D w/0 REFIRGER0TOR R 914000ED REVISION REQUIRED RANGE /OVEN ROD AND SHELVE SOLID CORE OR SECURITY CAMERA SECTION SOUAR0 FEET SHEET SYWW SINK WITH DISPOSAL SPEOIF10010145 STANDARD STEEL STORAGE STR0CNPAL 01(40 wen. TONGUE AND GROOVE TOP OF T08FA PAPER DISPENSER BATHTUB • TELEV60N 1YPI04 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE UNLESS NOTED OTHE1W150 VINYL FLOOR GOWNING VAPOR WIRIER 00711041 VESTIBULE NW. WALL 0000867 1NN0C0T 041ER CLOSET 0000 WATER RESISTANT WITH WASHER/ DRYER VATHOLIT YAM x I/ T + 1001' CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK META SRO PARTITION FINISHED WOOD ROUGH 8000 OR 81.0011180 BLOCKING OR SHIVA WOOD STUD PARDON SOIL BORING EX6T10 GRADE ELEVATION + r 110.01 NEW GRADE ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES paq 11.1 1'II, SAND EARTH GRAVEL PLYWOOD STEEL 8ATT OR LOOSE FILL 06UTA1101 RIGID INSULATION ACOUSTIC TILE (00T0 GRADE CONTOUR NEW GRADE CONTOUR T P 14004 DEEM N0. SHEET N0. SECTION OR ELEVATION DIRECTION IMITATION . WALL TYPE WI-WINDOW TYPE DOOR 101.®ER OFFICE+ -R008 DESCRIPTION �'- R0011 816,19ER CODE SUMMARY IACONO =rpm BASED ON OE CODES THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN EFFECT: MINNESOTA STATE 514.106 CODE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE MIENNATON8L RESDEM61 CODE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE MINNESOTA Pl0M8N0 CODE U74FORN MECHANICAL C01E MINNESOTA DERV CODE WORN FIDE CODE RATIONAL. FIRE CODE ELEVATE* CODE 1NPLOP40 Obi TqN I RESTAURANT 0550040 C14 3506110N A-2 (54.00014 3023,2 N08006 RATED USES) IBAtR4 CDIIBR0.4-71044 TY7'B TYPE 11 -8 WAND ANNA MAN LEVEL : 7,530 05F MEZZANINE LEVEL : 1,840 050 TOTAL: 9.370 050 ALOWNELE FLOOR AREAS 71A81E 107) FOR MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY (11 -8'): 700W88LE AREA PLOWABLE STORIES AREA 11001117171000 SECT. 505 40080X: 8,500 GSF 2 STORES K • 100 (11/P -025) 0/30 7 • 100(311/404 - 025) 30/30 • 77 IR =n I b = Al + (A 7/100) + (Al 9 /159) b • 0.500 + (9.500 0 77/150) + (9.500 K 200 /150) I b • 35,815 SF PER R50R TAB/XIS= FEB TISSI',TANE NOM PCB BIT.WAL:R (10' 1 -48 510<30' 0-712 301< 0 -HR NO WALLS EAST WALL (22' -6') Al. OTHER WALLS OCOUP0NT MAO -TAG.R b00RRB LOAD FACTOR • 75 GROSS MARE FEET /OCCUPANT DIN010 AREA LOAD FACTOR • 200 GROSS SQUARE FEET /000011 NI KRONEN LOAD FACTOR = 700 GROSS SQUARE FEET /OCCUPAN1 OFFCE 4,030 (SF /15 OSF /0CC • 269 OOC1114A06 AT GRME 3.500 GSF /200 050 /000 = 18 OCCUPANTS ABOVE GRADE 1.840 0SF/200 050 /OCC - 19 OCCUPANTS BELOW GRADE EXRBY! WO714746.06000' 0 ST NE = 0T /0CCUPAM (0.2 z 19 = 3.8') OTHER • 0.15'/OCCUPANT (0.15 z 346 • 2.85') 383700107838060 MA310118 RISER - 7', 901608 N500 4' 1READ 8751N 11' ROOF A00529 4005.1.4155 70638 R0011 ACCESS DOOR 7715F 06.101(7'0004.117104754 MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FULLY 5PWNK1E0 - 250' TYS PIES LE GAC E AT WOODS EDGE TOWN CENTER DRIVE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PROJECT TEAM RAC LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL,LLC 1300 WELLS FARGO PLAZA 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN. 55431 JACK BRANDT (952) 536 -2400 TELEPHONE (652) 835 -2401 FAX J8RANDTOHARTFDRDGRP.COM ARCF9FECTTRi4I SERY.^..EB HARTFORD GROUP, INC. ARCHITECTS /ENGINEERS 1300 WELLS FARGO PLAZA 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN. 55431 MATHEW NUGENT (952) 838 -240D TELEPHONE (952) 838 -2401 FAX MNUGEMOHARTFORDGRP.COM HARTFORD GROUP, INC. ARCHITECTS /ENGINEERS 1300 WELLS FARGO PLAZA 7900 XERXES AVENUE 500104 81.00MINGTON. MN. 55431 PATRICK SARVER (952) 838 -2400 TELEPHONE (952) 838 -2401 FAX PSNNEROHARTFORDGRP.0011 CPR- B IC2 HARTFORD GROUP. INC. ARCHITECTS /ENGINEERS 1300 WELL FARGO PLAZA 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN. 55431 AARON ARCHBOLD (952) 838 -2400 TELEPHONE (952) 838 -2401 FAX AARCHIBOLSOHARTFORDGRP,COM STRUCTURAL 13aaERESIIKE HARTFORD GROUP, INC. ARCHITECTS /ENGINEERS 1300 WELLS FARGO PLAZA 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MN. 55431 GARY RENHOLD (952) 336 -2400 TELEPHONE CRONHOLOOWAR4FORDCRP.COM SHEET INDEX C- -01ECMGAL 038:00 BRAUN INTERTEC 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE. 5. MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55438 RON SHAFFER RS (952) 995-2234 91NWOi4084TA- E3T1 208 BRAUN INTERIM 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE. 5. MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55435 KEVIN HOFFMAN 995-2234 TELEPHONE RH 2OFF E MANOBRAUNCDRP.COM mmomsLogis STEEN ENGINEERING 5430 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTH CRYSTAL MN 55429 GENE HDDEL (763) 585 -6742 (763) 585 -6757 510757ECENE7.COM A. E STEEN 0101NEERING 5430 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORM CRYSTAL. MN 55429 STEVEN M. YOUNG5 (763) 585 -6742 (763) 585 -6757 5TEENOECENET.0094 PP, W 4 ...m uua mom mum- 4. MIA ■ EVA IBM l II=MI7MEr�'J� -=r7- - es�-M -1 ■ ou m.• :1o�u .u���3uu ■ uHU Ell 111111111■Js VICINITY MAP Imo 111111E 58001 51RUOiL:A1 ORAWNC.5 51 FOOTING AND 0UNOATION PLANS 52 LOW ROOF AND MEZZANINE FRAMNG PLANS S3 4004 ROOF MANS PLAN 54 DE1AL5 LEY 04.0 EXISTING SURVEY PLAN I C1.1 EXISTING SURVEY PLAN II C1.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C2.0 LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN 02.1 ENLARGED LAYOUT PLAN C3.0 GRADIN0 AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 04.0 UTILITY PLAN C4.1 PHOTOMETRIC UGHIING PLAN C5.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0RCHREC01RA1 OR4WI5 81.1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN 41.2 MEIZAN4E LEVL RAN A1.3 ROOF PLAN 41.4 FLOOR FINISH PLANS A1.5 REELECTED CEILING PLANS A2.1 ENLARGED PARTIAL PLANS E: SCHEDULES 63.1 EXTERIOR MEMOS Al ENLARGED EXRR177R 070401IOS 85.1 BUILDING SECTION 85.2 BUILDING SECTOR A6.1 WALL 4000146 A6.2 WAIL SECTIONS 46.3 WALL SECIOO A8.4 WALL SECTIONS A6.5 WAIL SECTIONS A7.1 DETAILS 072 7ETNL5 MECHAMCAL GROWN($ 81.0 FIRST LEVEL PLUMBING PLAN 61.1 SECOND LEVEL PWMBING PUN 4812 80011 144.019&0 PUN 742.0 FIRST LEVEL 1P/AC PLAN 82.1 SECOND 1E0E1 NAG PLAN 13.0 MECHANICAL DETAILS 143.1 WASTE AND VENT PPWG GROGRAM 043.2 WATER PIPING 0LAGRAM 94.0 8ECM0IOAI EDUIPBEM SCHEDULE ELECTRICAL D EILA E6 E1.1 517E PLAN SEOUL. 02.1 MAN LEVEL LIGHTING PUN 02.2 9754374E LEVE7. 001ING PUN 031 MALI LEVEL POWER AND SYSTEMS PLAN E3.2 MEZZANINE LEVEL POWER AND 5YSI0M5 PUN E4.1 0.7007101. RISER AND SCHEDULES BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,935 S.F. SITE: 0.29 ACRE u.■ TOWN CENTER PARKWAY L Orr =r FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD rOROUP A/E INCA: IAu* WE7 Kb 78 AMA 7C6mlMt wart 70 o7FRed44AK>em•ry NAA 07.,01011 and Vol I=noEMy R 7,lb lam NW Ibex 4 Nom __ W 941 IN. IOW CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100 RINSE 5 £ WR EDEN PRAIRIE IAN 5070:100 M OD.7AS1201 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 8 -15 -05 - CRY REVISE LET 0-26-06 - BID SET G REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER: T1 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER I F / — , : /.: / ,.:':.. _.. _ / I r ��!! / i ! 1 1 / / !! !r: , !!!! / � !!!!! /r /1 / i / !.` ! / \ ! I ! ! r / I.: !!! i / ♦!! / "- / i `! j I I ,Y -'� / I' / / / /, -:/ / /r ! / / ./ • I 1 I \LIbT , ! \ 'P� noY � / 911.05 - - I .. / r G�/. /r / /- / \ \ �/ // // !_. // � � /� 1.:. t. / / / . / � \ ` / r / / .. / \ �� . :. / /, ,� / r / / % \ I / 1:11 �/ 91v 7o -... � /y ,// / • / �! CA ./ r: / !! L/ I . !!! ir / / /.`/ / \ • LNgT !! J yy++a . O F • , / tY' / \ \C�UC ! �/i // , I SEDIMENT FEPICE'LOCATED �! / O / 4—EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES: ---*- 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY BASED UPON PROPOSED CITY IMPROVEMENTS AND SITE CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPROVALS AND CLEARLY DISPLAY ALL PERMITS AND APPRDtlAlS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AGV7ES 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT - GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' COMPANIES NOTIFY OR 8CATION -1100) AND UTILITY COMPANIES TO NOTIFY LOCATION OF NEW UTILITIES 48 HOURS MINIMUM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY PROPERTY. OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SURVEY INFORMATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTOR ACTIVITIES AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES THAT YAL IMPACT PROJECT WORK 5. EXISTING HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL POINTS SHALL BE FLAGGED AND PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THHE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. DAMAGED BE OR REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S POINTS EXPENSE. 8 CONTRACTOR TTHHEE DURATION OF THEE 51E SECURITY CONTRACT. DAMAGED OR VANDALIZED STOCKPILE SHALL BE REPLCED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE DEVELOPER. ACCESS TO THE SITE OR DELIVERY AND�NSPLECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. B. 774E CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO hIENTIFY AND VEGETATION IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS URTO BED MNED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE 9. IF NECESSARY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTOR FENCE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENgNEERMNDSCAPE ARCHITECT. L9/1T5 OF CONSTRUCTION DEL Ta GENERAL POSITION TEMPORARY FENCING. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE FENCE ON OR NEAR THE SURVEYED PROPERTY LINE IMPROVEMENTS. M1ERiER WITH CONSTRUCTION OF ,••• 1 i. ._�� ° `- PLANNER � �"����p� HARTFORD - C3S' 1-0k OUlsA1h SRI:. I wnalxw 1 envy mtiry um tlm pa. neeYmtla mart so paned y ma a under my eme a Aiwa teed tld I ten J o d linnerdm kd•We! Mr tlx MP 6 be ame of mermen Dab Weed Loam Na. MOE CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS-LL, LLC I / AT BASE THROUGHOUT I !! L-1T ` S'�Prr /i. / .f /•/ ! m / / OF CONTRACT (TIP.) +l/cn` :/ r ,'♦ _ / /_ 7 ®! ',r / ' 1 1 `� / APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ! TEMPORARY STOCKPILE ! !'f y/ 1 I / / / WITH OTTOU SHALL VERIFY / �, ` - — i, I. 1 1 • ."1 / 1 '1 /y . — . ^ . LIMIT OF CONSTRUGTON� — . . — . — 1 // ;/r / / / / // \ `905 \ // Y '\ • 1 / PRONDE SEPARATE BID FOR /. . - -/ J "/ ALL WORK OU9DE OF BETTYS 1 .�. /,/ / 1 1 _. PLmS PARCEL SEE BID FORM - L / /. / l / , • / ' / / / � / . %/ P /g —/ /1 PROVIDE SEPARATE BID FOR r__— __ —__ /I / ALL WORK VAMIN BETTYS PIES / \ PARCEL SEE BID FORM I ` / � � // / // I I F,'. /.. 1 // ' i /` \ j �/- / / /• .......... 1 r / '/ MOD SATE3I0 PH: 951.7461201 PROJECT: BEM 'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PAPJCWAY ISSUE: O -IS -DS - qIT REVIEW bET FPe -DB - BO SE / I LIME OF PROPERTY AND ROW. VERIFY / \ 9 I PRIOR TLOCATION CONSTRU01I • ��' /• %y/ �/ _.- -. ': UMI.i. DF:.CONSTRUCTgi\' ''• - -- _ _ -- \ \ _ C T _ ;. �. ----. _ — i i F'` 90 ,.. . ■ REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE . OVERALL EXISTING - ! CONDITIONS PLAN 1- 20' - I D FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NUMBER: C1.2 ©comm.!nos. WNnm,m Gu, An, ixC AA0NEcism Gl4.mi wrB6 NOT IN CONTRACT (NI.C.) 9512 CURB FOR r' 7 / S..CIVNOCT • _ TAPER CURB TO MEET RIBBON CURB 8612 R C566 AND CU NOT IN CONTRACT (0.1.0.) UNIT OF 0612 CURB -1 AND GUTTER UMIT OF BITUMINOUS^ PAVEMENT 612 CURB FOR _syENT1RE ISLAND C NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) L`IT OF CBN NOT IN CONTRACT (NLC.) LIRTIF CONSTRUCTIRN— v/ / / NFlBASIN LTRATION / / / /` i / / /' i ! i _ . J / if a /g 8� O RIB: TOT C6 N 1 2052.6431 _U n. • G7Ickv NT PAVEME NING -SEE T AN01746I< RPANG • NOTE - ••- / 1/ i/ 1S R 15 UMITOV BROWNCJS - 8214' .'UMIT OF 5612, 2106:.. AND GUT sR. BG12 Ci022 55L . • PAVEMENT 6015 -SEE L2YOU' RFVt.G 257E 6 ATO. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PAVSHALLT:MENT NG MEET EXIST SHALL MEET EXISTING CURB (TYP.) 2i / / k� / / y: i c� s12 t51.2 CURB ',ANC 5U2T55 CT..) SOMME OE7RAIB0 / BUILDING NOT IN CONTRACT (0.1.0.) —UTILITY CABINET OPTION B: TEMPORARY IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL CONTROLS, ENCLOSURE AND CONCRETE PAD. COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION MATH ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP m LIMIT OF 8612 CURB AND GUTTER UTWTY CABINET OPTION A: 'TEMPORARY IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL CONTROLS. ENCLOSURE AND CONCRETE PAD. COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION - :LMHIi of TiliTRUCnon BUILDING NOT 1N CONTRACT (N.I.0 .) BITUMINOUS PAVEN SHALL MEET EXIST PAVEMENT •65 AN. U L' SHALL MEET 555111 CURB (TYP.) STREET TRAFFIC S (S.T.S.) (17P.) 17 — E 0,8.41 r 1' 20' oG 2O +— AND PAVING NOTES: -4- 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE M1TH CITY ORDINANCE 2. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS. CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. DECORATIVE PAVER LIMITS AND LAYOUT SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT COLORS AND MATERIALS FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE 70 FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILD/NM ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 5. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL ENTRANCES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE OTT ORDNANCE 5. PARKING STALLS SHALL BE STRIPED WITH A 4' WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE. ACCESSIBLE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE PAINTED WITH A 4' MADE WHITE PAINTED UNE: 16' ON CENTER AND AT 45' ANGLES TO THE STALL STOP LINES SHALL BE 13- WIDE WHITE PAINTED UNE 7. HORIZONTAL A115 VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS SHALL COORDINATE 1141H THE EXISTING BENCHMARK AS INDICATED ON THE SURVEY/EXLSTING CONDITIONS DRAWING. SIGN SCHEDULE: ® STOP SIGN (R1 -1) ® VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING 1YX78' (L35) © VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING 12'X18' (87 -8A) MOUNT BELOW 2(06 6 NO PARKING SRN R7 -101 (12X18) COORDINATE OEUVERY HOURS SHOWN ON SIGN WITH OWNER PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING -1 DOOR MOUNTED SIGN- COORDINATE MOUNTING AND HARDWARE 84TH DOOR MANUFACTURER EXIT ONLY -SEE HOSTESS TO BE SEATED - COORDINATE FABRICATION. TEXT, FONT AND INSTALLATION WITH BUILDING SIGN CONTRACTOR TO REFLECT EXACT BUILDING SGNAGE COLOR, ORIENTATION, AND FONT LEGEND: LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT UNITS OF 6E71/10U5 PAVERS LL. 'J ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 'tGR .I: FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CCIWIGHT 2®5,IMRIIaRR CAW NE D X.AY65T5C11/EHGW52A5RJ4006 45896 e.DT that 0* Peg 4tlfmUOe !If mr.ed =PHs e 646461,64 I'.amd Imd.a Atlid t der 0. ma d re ow d W.mt 9de Pobid Sam tama lb. 24905 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100115686164 EGEH MAME, HN SUIIE140 PM: 952.761210 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 5-16 -05 - 5011 REVIEW 5E7 8-28 -05 - 810 XT REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: OVERALL LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C2 ■O C5J N 1UU R 61�tlpirtg111 II�II�II�II�II�t1. E-21TIP 10I�0 'ICI �I�PI�P lr� ohalr! � X11 i•uau•i ■JI FENCE xlct TE) SI G SEE s,s.s. STLEDULE V?DE ORNAMENTAL F-2.0ESTRIAN ` G-Kic - �SPkb�T LF,_O ORNAMENTAL RAIL PANEL 0ESIGN SHALL. MATCH PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FDIC, BY THE CITY CRNAMENTAL PA c_MENT eAND SE- LECORFI1V PAYED NT NG ES', A� I (1 -` SRAIMP osszeNwooNal cum° or Nth _ NrIN4 i•nu • w11 (tVVi' 4.0AG //i UMW' .111 II II/ al REFOO MEI UM IN � P2P6\M�L � ...P01N�O.t• 11)� \� II ;M : �� AMIIM ♦ -AMIN �u iluI® `1� ==.11L•.111111 : 111111111111•1111111111111111 VIII (y 'VIIImoisri∎ REMDVA: WASTE CONTAINER AND CIGARETTE DISPOSE CONTAINER AS SPECIFIED TYR II SEE DECORATIVE PAVEMENT NOTES CONCRETE SEAT WALL AMENTAL PAVEMENT BAND. EE ATVE PAVEMENT NOTES DECORATVE PAVEMENT BORDER. SEE •ECORA VE PAVEMENT NOTE TREE GRATE BUILDING NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) CORATI P M T TYPE II DECORATIVE PAVEMENT NOTES EXTERIOR LIGHTING SEE UGHTNG PLAN (TIP. BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,935 S.F. SITE: 0.29 ACRE EBSOMS 12 R CONCRETE STOOP SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS CONCRETE STAIR -SEE GRADING PLAN TROWEL EDGE OF CONCRETE FOR PLANTING AREA DINA CONCRETE WALX NSTALLA ON AND SCORING WITH CI WALK CONCTRACTOR WALK SHALL ABUT PROPOSED STRUCTURE. (TYP.) _ - / CONCRETE 514)6 / SEE GRADING. PLAN RETAINING' WALL 2 4.04' - BRICK' PIERS VA1N 2 SCULPTURES. CAP D OR -I - SHALL E CON 1-) BAS - SCULPTURES PIER MATERIAL, SIZE, AND COLOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SCULPTURE SHALL BE 2X2'X6111 L- SHAPED / CORIENED STEEL PANELS WITH TREE MOTIF DESIGN. COORDINATE THE DESIGN, FABRICATION. AND METN00 / OF INSTALLATION WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. COORDINATE LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CONDUITS FOR UGHTING WITHIN BRICK PIERS. APPROXIMATELY 165 LF. ORNAMENTAL RAILING (TYP.) APPROXIMATELY 15 LF. TRENCH DRAIN-SEE UTILITY PLAN ORNAMENTAL PAVEMENT BAND. SEE DECORATIVE PAVEMENT NOTES •\ . TREE GRATE (TTP:) V DECORATIVE PAVEMENT BORDER. SEE DECORATIVE PAVEMENT NOTES RETAINING WALL SEE GRADING PLAN (TYP.) CITY STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS BY OTHERS. VERIFY LIMITS OF PROPERTY AND LOCATION OF MATERIALS MTH'THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (TIP.) 0 10 I1i.j1' s 1 1111111 r� rq ,1 ■r �li, ,1111 ■ r�EMI I.rl�N� &ME o■rrrr41 /J i n.-_ j •rr ®n r‘001 1411111110111/ 1 Inn Mg 00 A '‘i liktragl NIL MOW" 14111114141 - ll�ilr15= - TALL i1= !- _— ''i��fl� rr11■ yam MtE PAVEMENT TYPE I RANDOMLY LOCATED ENGRAVING -SEE PAVEMENT SCHEDULE ./rlll ice► Amour nnnrrm�nnnnll! REMOVABLE WASTE CONTAINER AND CIGARETTE DISPOSE CONTAINER AS SPECIFIED ORNAMENTAL RAIL WITH 4 WIDE SWING GATE DECORATIVE PAVEMENT TYPE III -SEE DECORA PAVEMENT NOTES Y_ PAVEMENT BORDER -SEE /DECORATIVE A NOTES C CRETE SEAT WALL AIM SITE LIGHTING -SEE SHEET C4.1 (TYP.) TR GRATE (TYP. OF 4) DECORATIVE PAVEMENT PAVEMENT NOTES REMOVABLE WASTE CONTAINER AS SPECIFIED ORATIVE PAVEMENT TYPE II -SEE 0 CO -A PAVEMENT NOTES AT PLANITING AREA ovi ORNAMENTAL RAIL (T(P.) CONCRETE STAIR Inn ■ ■rrr�_�rl!■ „- rrrrrrrrr ■■'!r' • �rrrrA�11rE1:11 r.• �I�I yam- ��6��� r✓l�' • SITE ENLARGEMENT PLAN PAVEMENT TYPE SCHEDULE: NOTE SUBMIT SAMPLES TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNER AND CITY PRIOR TD INSTALLATION. PAVEMENT TYPE 1: TYPE I SHALL BE 24 "024152 PAVER STACK PATTERN. DARK. CRAY AND UGHT TAN IN COLOR. ALTERNATE COLORS OF PAVERS PER ROW AS APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ENGRAVED PAVERS SHALL BE RANDOMLY LOCATED AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ENGRAVEMENT SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC AT 16 CHARACTERS PER UNE MAXIMUM -3 LNES MAXIMUM PER PAVER. COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER FINAL TEXT. FONT, FONT SIZE, AND ENGRAVEMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MATERIALS AND COLOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY 711E OVNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SEE PAVER DETAIL (TYP,) PAVEMENT TYPE R: TYPE II SHALL BE 12012"X2" PAVER STACK PATTERN LIGHT SAND BLEND N COLOR. MATERIALS AND COLOR SHALL BE APPROVE0D BY THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SEE PAVER DETAIL (TYP -) PAVEMENT TYPE 111 TYPE NI SHALL BE 4 "%81X2 PAVER HERRINGBONE PATTERN AT 4570 PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC, RED/BLACK BLEND IN COLOR. SOLDIER COURSE BORDER SHALL BE CHARCOAL OR DARK GRAY N COLOR MATERIALS AND COLOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR 10 INSTALLATION. SEE PAVER DETAIL (TYP.) ORNAMENTAL BAND PAVER: BAND SHALL BE 41X8"02° PAVER (1) COLUMN SOLDIER COURSE, DARK GRAY IN COLOR. INSTALLATION OF BAND SHALL MAINTAIN PRIORITY P600500NG0 WHEN CROSSING OTHER PAVEMENT TYPES AND BORDERS. 15515 PAVEMENT TYPE USED FOR RADIUS' AT DOORS, AND CROSS BANDS (E -W), AND ADDITIONALLY 1 (N-S) BAND WITHIN EXTERIOR SEATING AREA AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. MATERIALS AND COLOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SEE PAVER DETAIL (TYP.) BORDER PAVER: BORDER SHALL BE 4"%81X2 PAVER (1) COLUMN SOLDIER COURSE. COLOR SHALL MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. LOCATION OF BORDER SHALL BE AT EDGE OF BUILDING, SEAT WALL, TREE GRATES. RETAINING WALL TRENCH DRAINS, AND UTILITY STRUCTURES AS NOTED ON THE DRAWING. SEE PAVER DETAIL (TYP.) BORDER PAVER SUB-NOTE 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SAMPLE COLOR AND MATERIAL OF EACH BORDER TYPE USED AT BASE OF SEAT WALL BUILDING WALLS. TREE GRATES, PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN, AND ALONG AND ACROSS PAVEMENT TYPE IN. RETAINING WALL TRENCH DRAIN SEE UTILITY PLAN BRICK PIERS AND SCULPTURE - ENLARGEMENT PLAN CITY' STREETSCAPE LMPROVEMENT MATERIALS BY OTHERS.. VERIFY LIMITS OF PROPERTY AND LOCATION OF MATERIALS WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WALL LAYOUT PLAN 1• - 6, r FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ® Cwfww,2OOS, 551F0104Pm. NE, INC ONO51ECT3/ENOHNEI6A4NMNA ARCH11 tc° I /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD AAL:Mtstrialnlri I NO, may VW Ifo PIA PAMPA dmOA m mPAnd 5 e+ s w. NW ad dS ad ds1 aAA 44. Lbw L . AOV1M adn W `Y N tlAA Al IY•mm hOOk lima IP 24101 CONSULTANT: ONNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100NNGLEIRE TAPE EDEN PANNE ON SUITE:100 HH: 114-7461207 PROJECT: Bt I I Y'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CEHNBL PARKWAY ISSUE: 6 -15 -OS - CDT REVIEW SET 9-29 -05 - BID SET L1 REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SITE ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C2.1 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS LINO LAKES TOWN CEFITER PARKWAY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD IMMD 1 Mt* =SS' Tel M 88. 9A55MWA bRpm PR.. b m •rb q m G DIES:_ ml MS Ito • Olt IOW lE A•tcH woo to to 11 9E 11: Mme. NW I _51!9514 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100 sm¢EIt'0 LAM EDEN PSNNE. 5450221 PM: 952.7461.7t0 ISSUE: 0-15-94 - CRY REVIEW SET 11 -25-09 - A arc .L REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN NNTRACT ( I.OJ 1 / NOT 94 CONTRACT (N.I.C.) / / / / % LIMIT OF COIHSTRU�ilO1a — • — • — • — •_ / / / / / / / / / \ \4MT DI �S) A NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) EROSION CONTROL SEED MIX SEE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 2• SEDIMENT FENCE (TIP.) NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) -. � \CONSTq ��C =QV SEGMENT FENCE (TIP.) LI` OF • •S =Uc0 NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) SEDIMENT FENCE (TIP) STABILZED SEED .MIX AS 7 SPECIFIED SEDIMENT FENCE (TIP.) ING NOT I NTRAGT MIL.) PECTIED ED 6 SEDIMENT FENCE (TIP.) / / 'y01 903 909 STABILIZED SEED MIX iT5 SPECIFIED. , I. • C • 11.17 —0 cousTRUCnaa \: _ .... ... 05 -• 7 CONTRACT (N.I.C.) 903•— 957 BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,935 S.F. SITE 0.29 ACRE STA&U2ED PL U0 ON FINISHED GRADE S .LL MATCH EXISTING GRADE . � . _ire•w -1st TOWN CENTER PARKWAY 7 S E DETAIL APPROXIMATELY 1701.0. RETAINING WALL (TIP.) 1 / / 20 — EROSION CONTROL NOTES: —[f} 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SISTERS AS SHORN ON THE DRAWINGS W ADDITION TO OTHER MEASURES THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORGINANLE 2. 040 CONTRACTOR WU. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE SEDIMr01TAT10N AND EROSON CONTROL SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. THIS MMN1ENANCE SHALL INO.LDE C 055951NG AND /0R REPLA0040 SYSTEMS THAT HAVE BECOME CLOGGED OR NO LONGER FUNCTIONAL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT MONTHLY AND AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO INSURE 1140 INTEGRITY GS THE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL 80 RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND SATISFACTORY DISPOSAL OF ALL EROSON CONTROL STRUCTURES UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK AND SOL STABILIZATION AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 30 LF. OF SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR 70 THE OUTLET OF Ea0H STORM DRAIN PIPE TO CONTROL AND M9419125 SLT RUNS. 4-- GRADING NOTES: — - 1. 114E CONTRACTOR SHALL BE 9500045IBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGNET9R/LANOSCAPE ARORITECT PRIOR TO LOANING AN0 SODDING ACDIATIES 2. UNSUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL, AS SPEC11E0, SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF-SITE 3. SUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE 5T00PILED IN A MANNER AND LOCATION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED OUTSIDE 114E UNIT OF WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENS W A MANNER APPROVED 130 THE 040NEER/LAN05CAPE ARCHITECT. 5. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOT1INE FINISHED CRADE ELEVATIONS 6. LONGITUDINAL SDPES OF WALKS SHALL 90 5% (MAX.) AND 1% (MIN.) AND 2% (MAX) CROSS 9.00E EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERW55 ON 1040 0RAWNGS. SIRES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL REQUIRE SURFACE ROUGHENING BY EITHER 'STAIRSTEP' GRADING. GROOVING, FURROWING. OR TRACKING 10 AVOID RUNOFF VELOCITY AND 000010EE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. SLOPES LESS THAN 3:1 NOT STABILIZED WITH VEGETATION SHALL HAVE 114E SURFACE ROUGH GRADED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY UNTIL SOO HAS BECOME STABILE AND MATURE. AT NO TIME THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF TH5 CONTRACT, SHALL SLOPES 95 A 50400TH GRADE OR A COMPACTED SURFACE. 419 42D + 422.0 r %yea 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 5• CONTOUR ELEVATION NTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION SEDIMENT FENCE 0U1FALL. CURB AND GUTTER AS SHOWN ON 1•1S PLAN UNITS OF 51ABIUZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ETR0SON CONTROL SEED MIX 'SEE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE STABILIZATION SEED MIX 5� LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE RF_TLN4D SEED MIX SEE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © 06661.11 2.16, NIA1lWS RMM NA MC. 601171 CI566/16,60.616 SHEET NUMBER: C3.0 NOT IN CONTRACT / //. /1 / / / // e/ / / • NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) TEMPORARY / T HYDRAN 09,3 CND AN W/3 B•X6' REDUCER -/ o �B' 45' BEND / r 22.5' BEND L---T \ �8' 45' BEND NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) ECS DRAINAGE SYSTEM -SEE r DETAIL / • 7 FORMPAVE WITH CURB EDGING HYDRANT W /GV GND 0.906.1 \A'{/C 22' -6 DIP 8 TEE C%6' REDUCER 6 -22.5 BEND 6'- 11.25' BEND •/ S7-21-QCTOM • 29' -8' PVC STUB O 0S0% IE.89L07 ,-r GATE VALVE G PIUG LBRt7 / / / FES -100 • IE -85 00 5-2X3' CATCH BASINS CONNECTED WITH 10 RCP RE- 904.06 E.89909 199' -18' RCP O 1.005-, B' CROSS 8' GATE VALVE MAINTAIN 1.5' MIN. CLEARANCE / BETWEEN PIPES (TOP) 4' WIDE INSULATON.� 4' THICK (TYP) 8• CATE VALVE � LT? TEE /3" DIP X 'T 1.5' CORP. STOP -'/ /- • 38' -1.5' TYPE IC COPPER P T1AL IRRIGATION BOX A ATE W /OWNER'S REP.) BUILDING NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) 8' GATE VALVE 8" PLUG 8 CROSS 21. -8' PVC 0 0.500 STUB IE889.34- 8. 22.5' BEND 0 11.25' BEND L34' -8• PVC O 0.508 STU8 10.891.09 -8 PUJG T. CARP. STOP 3B' -1 TYPE K COPPER 8' 45' 8END--. B' DP 8' GATE VALVES CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB (FIELD VERIFY LOCATION) WA91E -8• PLUG ■ u 11 12' -6' PVC 0 1.04% STUB 10.904.71 BUILDING NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) POTENTIAL IRRIGATION B00 B (COORDINATE W /OYBHER'S REP_) STMH1101 RE- 907.10 IDS ).904.58 IE(I 904.32 -4 VA LATION. 4' THICK 94' -8' PVC 0 1.040 ROOF DRAIN LOCATION 36'-6' PVC 0 1.108 10.9' RISER STUB 10.900.50 MUM i RE- 904.00 5.889.24 BETTY'S PIES BLDG: 7,035 S.F. SITE 029 ACRE 'NOTE: ROOF STORAGE TO BE U110712E0 FOR STORMWATER RATE CONTROL (5E ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) 15 LF. TRENCH DRAIN RE- 907.90 15.905.56 T_ ` -9' -8' PVC O 8.408 CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB 15- 889.20 (R0LD VERIFY) -- ------- - -. - -- ..TOWN CENTER PARKWAY JJ P' NECT TO EXISTING STUB (FIELD VERIFY LOCATION) CONNECT TO EXIS71140 STUB 10.890.79 (FIELD VERIFY) CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB 10.897.90 (FIELD VERIFY). 20 4- UTILITY NOTES: -IS' 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL 010LD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTWTE5 AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS 2 ALL EXISTING U19JTY 2OCA1I0N5 SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' (651- 454 -0002 OR 800 -252 -1156) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF -STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERMCE LINE INSTALLATION' AND 'SANITARY SEWER AND STORM 50928 INSTALLATION' AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS A550CtAT10N OF MINNESOTA AND SHALL CONFORM WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 4. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 5. ALL WATER PIPE 94AL1 BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) CLASS 52 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CDNRE1E PIPE (RCP) UNLESS OTHERN15E NOTED. 8. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF MIXTURES. 9 CATCH BASINS AND MANH0LE5 IN PAVED AREAS SHALL 8E 5UMPE0 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SURFED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS, RIM ELEVATIONS 5HONN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT 80010CT SURFED ELEVATIONS 10. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 4 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 11. TYPICAL HYDRANT =51510 OF: HYDRANT, GATE VALVE, 2.5' OF 6• DIP WATERMAIN AND ANY HYDRANT EXTENSION. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS SHALL BE 140508TAL. 12. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COYER I5 REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REWIRED TO MAINTAIN A 19611.9U14 OF 18' VERTCAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM. SEWER UNES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAN IS INCIDENTAL 13. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REWIRED FOR ALL MITES, UNLESS 0171ERWI5c NOTED. 14. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND SIZES WITHIN THE BUILDING MTH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 15. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDUUNG OF NEW UTILITIES, IRRIGATION SYSTEM. AND UNDERORAINS WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN 65 -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK 4- STRUCTURE SCHEDULE: -) 5)811C11 IRE S12E 5501ING M14-1 48' DIA R -1642 154-2 48' DIA R -1642 05-1 2'X3' RECT. R -4640 CB -2 2'03' RECT. R -4840 C8-3 21(3' RECT. R -4840 CB -4 TX0 RECT. 11-4840 09 -5 2'03' RECT. R -4540 STM8- 101 48' DIA R -1642 e NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY OR APPROVED EQUAL • f, FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Gl KKV4000L1m5. NALImRP LIMO AM mr ASxrte[mm.a.a000ze.®r ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. PLANNER II: ;HARTFORD 1 OOOPA%ElN.[ I Ind, 4559 Vol the FIe2 4595909 iwaft sm PP. by me or war p my mn g_45 9N I w 5 YW/ Ls* Fmiard Dam per 9e kw et IN Pete of Wrewto. 9oM Avon IL Ikam lh 072S CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 1U1m9KGIEIREE LANE tEENARAINE,EW Gu15Am OK: 95240= PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 9-16 -55 - CIIT REVIEW SET 9 -28-05 - 80 SET 1 REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE: UTIUTY PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.0 NOT IN CONTRACT (N.LC.) 7 / NOT IN CONTRACT (NI.C.) / / r _ - �Mrt_r �smu -TT2°." • _ • -- 0._.- 0.0 0.1 0.1 / Ok 02 U.3 0.3 �0.3 /r/ 0.0 01 03 OD 0.0 0. Ob 1 0.7 1.3 2.6 2.9 1.6 0.3 5 0 .1 0.3 0,7 '11 \v 02 0.4 2.4 1 :15 3.1 Li 2.5 6 7.3 3,1 11 2.4 49 55 3.0 .. 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.8 'n 9 1.6 2.9 2.6 1.3 ,-.. 0.o 0.0 OD 0.0 OD 0.0 0A • ....La r O\0, c / / 0.0 0`D ' tS.oy 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0D 0.0 0.0 r ,'' 0A OD / / b.o / �W • / li • / Ao / O.o %7 O.o e. l NOT IN CONTRACT °/ / 9.1 • +2 0.!L 0. 0.3 02 01 O� _ 01 0.1 0.0 (N.I.C.) (.?""/ / / `rr ICONS �, �. / OA . 0.1 ail. 0. / �U2 0.2. i� l J YI 0.D l 0.1 / 01 NOT IN CONTRACT i b.o (^LI'G.11 b.o b.o OD /OD b.o ill 0.1 0.i 0.o 0.o 0.o ' OD /'I OD 0 / / 0.1/ / r % /. r' _ J tiI /0.1 0.1 01 ,_ 0.2 3 0.3 b.3/- . 03 . _3_ . b.3! / 0. 0.9 1.1 3.1 0 1.3 3.1 0.8 .0 3.0 1 1.9 2.3 1.3 IA 0.9 02 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 5.3 2.5 62 2.6 4.8 2.5 1.4 2,6 22 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 02 02 0.2 02 02 0.3 0,4 0.7 BUILDING NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) 1.3 3.2 • LIl• 0.3 0 - 02 of -SPYst..za,cr,av I {!- LIGHTING NOTES: DISCLAIMER These calculations are NOT valid for owner or elty approval 0699 arty 'non -AU) represented proeuot' or fixtures not shown on this plan. Fixtures must be provided by ALD. Colcul06ons have been performed with our best interpretation of the details given to us. Some differences between measured and calculated results may occur doe to intolerances in calculation methods, testing procedures. component performance, measurement techniques and field a:mati0ns such as voltage, temperature variations. lamp manufacturer variations, and other vorlobles. Calculations do not take Into consideration objects such as, but not limited lo, trees, buildings, pavement, sidewalk. or cars. Calculation volues represent horizontal (I.e. fight meter facing straight up) &luminance PC levels (unless otherwise noted). N the real environment conditions do not motel the input data, differences will occur between measured values and calculated values AID 10 not responsible for acquiring or Interpreting any local lighting codes. These lighting calculations ore net a 6 betItute for independent engineering anolyals by a professional engineer. mourn fiat. PO.: As Fmpas Selo label I Z 00 12 2 AA 12 AA 6 t0 12 18 f4 15 16 17 i6 19 BB BB 013 CC 00 CC CC CC CC 00 DD DD DD EE EE EE 20 I Ee 12 12 12 22 22 22 22 22 22 25 25 26 20 20 20 20 21 6E1 20 22 (51 20 23 FF 24 FF 08 Ff 26 FF 27 FF 28 FF 29 FF 0 30 FF a1 32 FF 33 FF FF 35 FF 0 GO 2 37 GG 33 GG 2 30 tI BUILDING NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) 3.1 2.1 31 1.5 3D 1.6 0.7 PIES 5 S.F. ACRE %.5 0.95 0.6 55. TOWN CENTER PARKWAY TYPE AA -Wall mount .8N se8 TYPE CC- Canopy I'ght TYPE BB -Wail mount TYPE DD -Sign light TYPE EE,EE1- Parking Lot TYPE GG -Step light TYPE FF -Tree uptight i�ti; II f' 1y TYPE 10: LutEC DIR550570.44e Sn Caned: A,cnaecwreI Llehlr9 Deape 1O O 20 Lon... schedule Pared: Ae Pmjeac Symbol Desehollen AA ea CC 00 Lorna 700I0.0ANDS PCCSRSJR-M mall mount over rooms Alex Gordon 103.FT1Y100HP5.SRP n8'e9 art over romaJe0a) I Anefee rani Lumens I SINGLE 520D L0F Rename 0800 211000201.185 Omega 091650E01719MH -05 (Canopy ISM) SINGLE 9500 0800 M0FU15H.ws 2 0E1 EE 13 FF 4 GO 0515 070 (Gooseneck Si0nllghler Garden 01630E -252dn (05017 * 2 BASE) 2088 HEIGHT Gordm G15.2 -4771- 2508410(55817 0 5' BASE) 20 MT NEIGN7 SINGLE 07500E 1 SINGLE 345o 20500 0.700 Ca00 0.700 20593/00 V- 100■10010GIlLb 09070191.89 Bmnza.G7070MN-R.WF 100mund tree 14771) 0mten 9426INd1.LV -BLP Ines 9970) BACK.B40C SINGLE SINGLE 20500 5500 Lumen I24A550.100Ni56G3. 1.9/1545703044055011 (m melon deoma0Ne Own 5984) 1 SINGLE 9500 0.700 a9m 0.70D 0.700 GIN0791/81e0 9710GMm.Ns 880428050* 002579/03 Numeric sumo., PmjM: AW Propos Lapel Caweyps Avg IWmrenee Fc 1.15 78 GO aye Nee I9umnaee Fc 222 98 0D FOR BID ONLY NOT.FOR CONSTRUCTION 6, COPYRIGHT 20:15. n0n1 to a9aeur .l90,000lm(CTSAxemSExsmwxa5 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD i p' Pit CONSULTANT: NM AMMON, N. OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100 SINGF7EEIA10 EDEN GRN01, MN 500,003 PK 052.796120 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE 8-15-05 - 01T EDAM 5711 9- 20-05 - 110 SET 4 REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.1 DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0C. 1 G NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) NOT IN CONTRACT (04.I.C.) 1I1.15 OF CONSTRUTION-`" • STABILIZED SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED - QCRON ' au IMF:Fy >, NOT IN CONTRACT (04.1.0.) EROSION CONTROL SEED MIX WETLAND SPECIES SEED MIX NOT IN CONTRACT (N.I.C.) IRRIGA M06 COORDINATE LOCATION 1949 OF TREES NTH EC5 DRAINAGE SYSTEM UTILITIES IUM�T O '....csNSPeucri STAB sms.1SEEO-M J� A ' " PEFlED IRNIGA AREA STABILIZED SEED MIX. AS SPECIFIED •4. 1s• •• ,1_ IRRIGATED AREA BUILDING NOT IN CONTRACT . (44.4.0.) STABIUZED SEED 1.110 AS SPEOFlED UTIU1Y CABINET 0911094 A: TEMPORARY IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL CONTROLS. ENCLOSURE. AND CONCRETE PAD. COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION W11H ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IRRIGATED AREA IRRIGATED AREA UTIUTY CABINET OPTION A TEMPORARY IRRIGATION AND BUILDING NOT IN ELECTRICAL CONTROLS CONTRACT ENCLOSURE AND CONCRETE. (N.I.C.) -PAD. COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION - - . . • ,_. .___ - ... _UL4T::0!`- CONSIIiUCJIp�•- _ -�. /.' IRRIGATED AREA BETTYS PIES UTILITY CABINET: LOCAT INCDE ADJACENT' E TO MECHANICAL CABINETS INCWOE IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL CONTROLS. AND ENCLOSURE. COORDINATE FINAL MEGATON WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER PRICK 70 CONSTRUCTION BETTY'S PIES 81.03: 7,935 S.F. SITE 0.29 ACRE TREES AND 054405 BTIEDY - - .___..._._01HE1RS (.) IRRIGATION NOTES: ---4)- 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND /ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATON/MSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND /ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE ME RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL 0TUTY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB BITE. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND METERING FACIUIIES. 4. NE U LAYOUT N NOT PROVIDE IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTRACTOR TO PRODUCE AND SUBMIT 70 OP 30 INCLUDE 0 SPECIFIC FULL LINE T, AND HEM LAYOUT WITH SPRAY COVERAGES SHOWN. SHOP F DRAWINGS TO ALSO INCWOE SPEpRC EQUIPMENT, HARDWARE AND ALL ARPURTANENCE$ OCR COMPLETION OF SYSTEM. 5. ALL MAIN UNES SHALL BE 10' BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 6. ALL LATERAL UNES SHALL BE 1r BELLOW FNISHED GRADE 7. ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2' -0" BELOW THE FNISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2' -0" BEYOND PAVEMENT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT NTH THE 51EEVING MATERIAL 'FLUID' TO 2' -0' A80Yc FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED. 10. FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION, AS RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. 11. BACKRLL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS. 12. ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE GREEN IN COLOR. 13. GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE 114 PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER P0051BLE. 14. IRRIGATION CONTROUER LOCATOR SHALL BE VERIFIED ON -SITE NTH OWNER'S 809805ENTVL 15. CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL. SCUD COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE RUN UNDER MAIN UNE. USE MOISTURE -PROOF 5994090 AND SPUCE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES 1E. AVON OVERSPBAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT. WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INSMOUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE 17. ADJUST PRESSURE REGRATNO VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE 18. USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS • • 0 4- LANDSCAPING NOTES: --. 1. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4' LAYER LOAM AND SEED AS SPECIFIED UNLESS DTHERNSE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. AREAS WITHIN STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL RECEIVE LOAM AND SEED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. SEE SEEDING NOTES 8F10W. 2. LOCATORS OF DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTLI5ES, LIGHTING FIXTURES. DOORS AND WINDOWS AND STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE BALLED AND BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP. 4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4' LAYER OF 1 -1/2' CRAY ANGULAR TRAP STONE MULCH ON TOP OF A NON - BIODEGRADABLE FILTER FABRIC AND BORDERED WITH 3/16' TINA( STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGING 5. RAINGARDEN AND INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL RECEIVE ECS 55610AS A6I0 NE1LAWN ADVANCED TURF AS SPECIFIED. 6. ENTIRE 591E SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATOR SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY 109E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4- SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS: -t! 1. MET- TRATION BASIN SOIL MIXTURES SHALL BE 500 SANDY 504., 30X TOPSOIL, AND 205 ORGANIC MATERIAL 2. INFILTRATION BASIN AND EROSION CONTROL SEEDING SHALL BE A MIX OF WILDFLOWERS, GRASSES, SEDGES AND BULRUSHES SUCH AS AND NOT UM11ED TO A MIX OF NEW ENGLAND ASTER, CANADA TICK TREFOIL BLUE FLAD IRIS, SWEET BLACK EYED SUSAN, CANADA WILD RYE, FOWL MANNA GRASS, FOX SEDGE. MIXES SHALL BE PROVIDED BY PRAIRIE NURSERY; WESTFIELD. W7 53964 (B00) 476 -8453. 2. LOCATION OF RAIN GARDEN BASIN SHALL BE 10' MINIMUM FROM BUILDING FOUNDATIONS 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT BASIN SEEDING WEEKLY MD AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL ER051ON CONTROL MEASURES AND SEEDING TO INSURE THE INTEGRITY OF 114E EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM AND STABIUZATON OF THE BASIN. 4. THE CONSECUTIVE YEAR MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NATIVE PLANTINGS ARE NOTED IN THE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. PREPARE 517E AND SEED BASIN BETWEEN MAY 1 -JULY 1. MOW BASIN SLOPES AT A HEIGHT OF 6' -B" EVERY 30 DAYS AFTER PLANTING UNTIL SEPTEMBER 30 OR PER SUPPLIERS RECOMMENDATIONS. FOR CONSECUTIVE YEAR MANTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS, SEE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. 5. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE /MOOT 60B AND INSTALLED 140 LATER THAN JUNE 15114. IF PLANTING OCCURS AFTER AUGUST 1519i, SEED WITH A NURSE CROP OF RYE 140 LATER THAN OCTOBER 5TH. IF PLANTING HAS NOT OCCURRED BY OCTOBER 51H. THEN DORMANT SEED THE SITE NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 151. --- PLANTING SCHEDULE ---4' QTY. C069A014 NAME BOTANICAL NAME DECIDUOUS TREES 5 SUNBURST HONEY LOCUST Gemteia trlachanLWes var. mArm' s 'Suncole 4 RED OAK - 4 SWAMP WHITE OAK E PRAIRIE SPIRE AS Ouercls crown LEGEND: APPROXIMATE LOCATION FOR IRRIGATION SLEEVE FOR PIPE AND CONDUIT - SLEEVE SHALL BE 3' PVC AND 4' PVC WETLAND SPECIES 1A10 -5EE SEEDING NOTES STABILIZATION SEED MIX SEE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE SEE SEEDING NOTES WETLAND SEED MIX SEE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE SEE SEEDING NOTES IRRIGATION BID NOTES. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A910 INSTALL SEPARATE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. 2. (1) FOR PARKING A140 COMMON AREAS OUTSIDE BETT'Y5 PIES PARCEL AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND (1) 5151E14 FOR ALL PLANTING BEDS WITHIN BETTY'S PIES PARCEL 3. EACH SYSTEM SHALL BE INDEPENDANT WITH THEIR OWN CONTROLS, VALVES, M0 APPURTANANCES. 4. CONTRACTOR SMALL PROVIDE SEPARATE BIDS FOR THESE AREAS SEE BID FORM. ROOT SIZE COMMENTS Ouerso or Fro s oennwAvanicc 'Ruab8' B&B 2 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FOR B &B 2 1 ' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FOR B&B 2 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FOB B &B 2 1/2' CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FOR CONIFERIOUS TREES -� 3 BALSAM FIR Abic eonoalor B&B 5' HT. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AN 'AS -BUILT PLAN OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF COMPLETION TO OWNER'S REPRESENTIVE. A SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SNAIL BE MAINTAINED ON -SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION. 2D ALL PIPE S AND OVER SHALL HAVE RIRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN. 21. ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL 8ALVE5 WILL HAVE S MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4' WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3' BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX THERE SHALL BE 3' MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE. ORNAMENTAL TREES 2 SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE Moen '5Orina Snow 4 PAPER BIRCH 2 THORNLESS HAWTHORN 4 RIVER BIRCH Betula pooerllera Gataecus crux -aoI11 var. memo Betula paperllera B&0 1 1/2' CAL SPECIMEN TREE -FULL FORM B&B 1 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER- MULTI -51EM B&B 1 1/2' CAL SPECIMEN -TREE FORM B&B 1 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -MULTI -STEM DECIDUOUS SHRUBS c 0- C 0 31 COMPACT PJM RHODODENDRON Rbnboaendran '0.1. /, Compact' 6 IVORY HALO DOGW00D 7 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIRAE Comus alto 'BOXNelo' CONT. 36' HT. CONT. 36' HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0,C D ENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0.C. A Salroeo 6058100 '111994 Princess' 9 COMPACT BURNING BUSH Euon 91000 ost 'C ooclus B EMERALD MOUND HONEYSUCKLE LonlcN u x xllostaumam'EmoalO Mound 37 ROYAL BURGUNDY BARBERRY Berberls t0hber91! 'Gentry CulUvor' CONT. 36' HT. CONT. 35' HT. CONT. 36' HT. CONT. 24' HT. D ENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0.C. 0EN5E BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0.C, DENSE BRANCH - SPACE 3' 0 DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0.C. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS -14 DWARF BLUE GLOBE SPRUCE 9115 5505000 'Gabesn' CONT. 36' HT. FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION © PPYRIG r2 005. XIA0FORD PROP NEN14 AR5MDECN /DPINEFSl5u94aaas ARCHITECT /ENGINE81 PLANNER HARTFORD s� arey AN IAA Not rr eRra ler/m+ 90 5* en 441 N/ Mooed *091594 600* won RM ba M Em Me at Women. W NOW A Sere __ Mom Wv NON CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12.107 SIno.ONEL E MEN ROME, MN S urrz:tm FP: 0,746000 PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CURER 909143AY ISSUE: 5 -15-05 - CITY REVIEW SFr 9 -28 -05 - BM SET REV. THIS SHEET SHE"c1' TITTLE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C5.0 • • SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE x 4' WIRE HOOKED ONTO PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUN SURFACE E1�.7P . NEPR FABRIC WTM WIRE �11y� SUPPORT NEf AS SPECIFIED. \` \ METAL POST 4 AS SPECIFIED. LTFR FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WI101 METAL CLIPS 12"0.0. ANCHOR FABRIC WITH SOIL, TAMP SACKFUL DIRECTION OF FLOW CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH 8" METAL POSTS 0.C. MAX. SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 1. SEDIMENT FENCE SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ADJACENT 50E5 OR AREAS OF DSTURBANCE ER05ION CONTROL SYSTEMS BECOME STABILE AS APPROVED Bf THE CITY AS SPECIFIED. MEN % TO CONSTRUCTION AREA -, PLAN TO CONSTRUCTION AREA , „ r a g or, - AIIMOO= meime 6" MIN CRUSHED STONE 25' EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROAD EXISTING UNDISTURBED GEOTEX TILE FILTER FABRIC ROADWAY =EL PROFILE PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN SIABIUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MANTANED N A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REWIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING MTL ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP MOMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UN015TURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4' OR MORE IN DEPTH OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN A' AND 8'. OVERLAP END OF TOP 50RIP YI 4" AND STAPLE. 'D' EROSION STOP, FOLD OF MATTING BURIED N 01LT,- TRENCH AND TAMPED. • DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MMHG FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL I I� TYPICAL STAPLE /B GAUGE WIRE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3 C6. NOTE: 1. PUCE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL 211148M1VONIVt,18 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPnn '11TT'3N7 -41e- 2" WEAR COURSE TACK COAT 2" BINDER COURSE B" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE BITUMINOUS PANT WEAR COURSE BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE DENSE GRADED AGGREGATE BASE PROCESSED GRAVEL COMPACTED 009528DE 4 61 mnlnlnnliwi muM $1 MI '1IID�1 -II �RI�I 1- -1 =AV: -II �- II 1 -I-II II'u- PAVEMENT MATCH DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1/2" RADIUS FLASHED GRACE 0 SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT. APPLY TACK COAT EXISTING PAVEMENT COSTING BASE 3' RADIUS CORNERS 113 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER 3/4'/1' 0.55 SLOPE - CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB FINISHED GRADE CLASS V AGGREGATE �. SUBBASE -SEE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL (6' MIN.) NOTE: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUC110N JOINTS AT 10' -0" O.C. 01- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS CURB AND GUIIt8 (8612) DETAIL v NOT TO SCALE 06.1 FINISHED GRADE L----------- / rCONTINUOUS SIDPE CONCRETE CU AND GUTTER 1 RB - 82805ENT MATERIALS 5EE DETAIL I- IIWI1- / . r 5X SLOPE RIBBON CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL Ir1 NOT TO SCALE 1/2°x12" STEEL ROD WITH SLEEVE 2' 0.C. 3° MOE SMOOTH STEEL TROWEL FINISH 1/4' TOOLED RADIUS _ ' 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE WALK AS SPECIFIED . - JOINT FILLER NOTE: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0' 0.C. 0/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS EXPANSION JOINT NO10, CONTROL JOINT 1. CONC. WALK SHALL HAVE 3 STEEL RODS MIN. 2. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED 30 FT. MIN. 0.C. AND AT THE ENO OF EACH DAYS POUR I/O. W x 3/4' D TOOLED CONTROL JOINT (MAX. 5' O.C. TM.) W/ 1/4' RADII. -UGH!' BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC WITH 3" WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED EDGE 5" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED W1.6 X W1.6 WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS AS SPECIFIED 6' CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE WALK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NO7E5: 1. SEE LAYOUT DTMWNGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 2. 1/2° WOE EXPANSION JOINT AT CURBS. 3. WIRE MESH REQUIRED FOR WALKS 6' WIDE OR N LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. 6' RADIUS 12' DIAMETER 6' LINE WIDTH 3' UNE WIDTH 5 -6' SQUARE OVERALL 19° RADIUS ACCESSIBLE PAVEMENT SYMBOL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3" WIDE 50100TH STEEL TROWEL. FINISH 9 C6.1 4/ LEVEL LANDING 1.50 MAX. CROSS SLOPE FOR DRAINAGE 4"r .500 j 500' MIN ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 10 C6.1 111 1111 1E11111111111111 - _:-,,A,,LK •"" EA: SEE PAVEM TYPES 000.0 BORDER' SNGLE ROW 5 ;A I-I �-� - = - COURSE BORDER (TYR) SEE PAVEMENT TPE SC STEEL TROWELLED EDGE -' _ CONSTRUCTION JOINT SPACED 5' 0.C. (TP.) CONCRETE WALK WITH i. FINISH PERPENDICULAR NOTES 1. 505E PLAN FOR GENE 2. BASE BID SHALL INC 1 `'� _ _ .- '_ -- -- - .I11I11I1111111Ull11H11- DECORATIVE PAVEMENT PLAN PAVEMENT VARIES SEE DRAWINGS 1/2" W X 3/4" 0 TOOLED JOINT LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC WITH S WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED EDGE BISS®BESSICIIMISI te r ' 4 gT7, p.q''�lr�m�r� X11- -R'Id1 )--I,14ac:a II11 =49' CONCRETE PAVERS DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 11 C6.1 `PAVEMENT VARIES SEE DRAWINGS DOLE EAVY BROOM TO TRAFFIC LAYOUT. LUDE PAVER 80RDER, PAVER AND BASE MATERIALS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ALL PAVEMENT TYPE MATERIALS INTO THE BASE BID. FINAL LAYOUT, COLORS AND MATERIAL SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONCRETE PAVERS SET HAND TIGHT WITH SAND SWEPT JOINTS 1 -1/Z" SAND SETTING BED STEEL. OR ALUMINUM EDGING AS SPECIFIED- USDLIZE WHERE ADJACENT TO LOAM AND SEED AREAS " COMPACTED SCREENED GRAVEL BASE COURSE GEO1EX11LE SUBGRADE STABILIZATION FABRIC MPACIED 509088DE PAVER MG TREE BALL TREE GRATE PLANTING DETAIL 12 NOT TO SCALE 06.1 (1) 9' DIA LIGHT OPENING WITH 10 -3/e" DIA. GRATE BOLTED TO 117M GRADE TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL (2) TWO PIECE TREE GRATE AS SPECIFIED TREE AERATION SYSTEM-BLACK 4 '9 4" PVC CAP AND REDUCER ON SOLID PVC 195ER CORN TEE AND 80 DEGREE BEND AT CORNERS. GRATE SWILL CONTAIN OPENING FOR FLEXIBLE IRRIGATION FILL PIPE EXTERIOR ELECTICAL OUTLET 80X AND COVER AS APPROVED BY THE CIT'. COORDINATE LOCATION WITH GRATE MANUFACTURER (TYP.) PAVEMENT BORDER AROUND ALL SITE FURNISHINGS AS SHOW! ON THE PLANS (11P.) 16' DM. NIMMUM GRATE OPENING MULCH (2" MA1L) TO BOTTOM OF TREE GRATE USE PEA STONE TREE GRATE AS 5PECIFlED NON BIODEG845002LE 5000055E FABRIC SEE FLEXIBLE IRRIGATION DETAIL WALK - MATERIALS VARY SEE DRAWINGS PLANT 040KFlLL MIX AS SPEC. COMPACTED IN 6' UFTS TO MAXIMUM 0185111' OF 9205 IF ROOT BALI IS WRAPPED N PLASTIC OR NON- BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL TREE AERATION SYSTELI W/ 4' PVC PIPE, REDUCER AND BLACK PVC CAP 4' PERT. PVC PIPE WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC TREE PIT THE FULL SIZE OF GRATE ICCII 05'I7FI� L F,T�x 11=III I I�7- I1 =11 FI THREE TIMES WIDTH OF R00113811 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 13 NOT TO SCALE k C6.1 _ THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL 1401 TO SCALE 14 06., THREE TIMES MOTH OF 000198LL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL 15 NOT TO SCALE CS .1 l PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL 5HAPE) 8LANT TOP OF ROO/BALL 1 -2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 1 1 /2" TRAP STONE MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH 2' FROM TRUNK EXISTING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF RODTB8LL 1005ENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO -ROOT CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACKED. AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL PRUNE AS FlEID DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCNTEOT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2'X4010' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120 TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER H05E COLLARS TRUNK FURS JUNCTION: PUNT TREE 1" -2' ABOVE EXISTING GRADE 1 -1/2" TRAP STONE MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH Y FROM TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF R00T BALL IF NON - BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACKFlLL AS SPECIFIED 00 NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL i PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE YX47X13' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN W1114 TWO STRAN05 OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120' TO ONE ANOTHER WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BUCK RUBBER 1-1050 COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION, PUNT TREE 1 " -2° A80VE EXISTING GRADE 1 -1/2' TRAP STONE MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER KEEP MULCH 2" FROM TRUNK EXISTING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL IF NON- 810000800ABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACK0LL AS SPECIFIED DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (1YP OF 2) ENGINEER GRADE REFLECTIVE SCREENED 510505E PANEL AS SPECIFIED GALVANIZED STEEL DANCED 500ARE POST AS SPECIFIED GALVANIZED HARDWARE TO ATTACH TO SLE000 .N5808 GRADE PAVEMENT MATERWS VARY SEE PUN SLEEVE TO ACCOMMODATE REPLACEMENT POST PROCESSED GRAVEL BASE SITE TRAFFIC SIGN (STS) DETAIL NOT TO SCALE .1 16 C6 12' 0L4 CONC. FOOTING. SLOPE TOP OF FOOTING TO DRAIN COMPACTED SUBGRADE FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION (91 OXMWWR mII, NNl19P woo Arc, IN[. AAONFL15mW1NWAMpNAN16 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD Ltrznirnm 1 Amoy *85 88 1Ar elm, soseAmbso ®M nN em PRM M w O ne osier my mmvwanceelDM Moto. Doom! 4914 684.1 12. We Ma a Om M. macaw Fob. J. Unto 08e _- L'^-.. Na 2401 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12IW51NG1EIRE£{018 EDEN PRVEL NN MAIL. R1: 94 -14E12W PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN 0f1ER PARKWAY ISSUE: 9 -16 -06 - CRT UMW SR 9 -28-05 - 9® SET ,0 REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE SITE DETAILS I SHEET NUMBER: C601 • • • ANCHDR S E E M BOLT ORNAMENTAL M L 10101 6 WALL SEEM?* DETAIL � ===j-111-_-_=111E111--11111 1 1111=111 111 I El= 1 i1 0AIAP PROOFING. V RECOMMENDED BACKFIL �IIIIIIII CONTINUOUS LT RORAVELP -III- I FILTER FABRIC WRAP OF MORE) IN 1008* CONTINUOUS N FOOTING ® TOO= FORGOG10 FOOTING MBAR IOTA NOOK \_III -III 111-11 -1 =II aT I I rr Gower 1E11- I 1111 111- 1111111 r Dora 0881 REAR COIN. 3' COVER W RETAINING WALL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE it 1 C6.2 3' COM H• NOON LEN3TH. SID 80. NOOK N• 0 FOR f-0BAR HT, ID' FORTS BAR H• 17 FOR. DAR 11.1t. FOR 07 BAR NOTES: 1. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS SPACED 30 0.C. 2. PROVIDED EXPANSION JOINT AT WALL AND BUILDING FACE INTERSECTION. /--INSTALL POSTS INTO 1 3/r DNA. CORE HOLE WITH NON -SHRINK GROUT, CROWN FOR ORAINA00. SEAT. AS SPECIFIED (TIP.) 8'W CONCRETE SDE WALL. 48041 /- SHALL BE FLJSH MAT14 8050 00 STAR FINISHED GRADE I ti:11/i-••• 'W1-1 I E1 I 11111 =III-- RA.5MS DETAIL SECTION A -A' - I/2' RADE EXFAN90N JOINT WITH SEALANT. 2'L X 3/6` OA STEEL 00881. MATH SLEEVE MATERIALS VARY SEE PLANS 8' DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE SPACE POSTS EQUALLY AS REWIRED. MAXIMUM 0.8. -1 1 1/2' 01A BRUSHED ALUMINUM 10515 AND RAIL 1/4' SEAM 4010 JOINTS FURNISH AND INSTALL RAILING TO MATCH SLOPE OF STAIR MOUNT TO FACE OF WALL INHERE APPUCABLE. 144', / ^RAIL SHALL BE 1 1/2- MAX FROM FACE 94 MBAR SPADED 3r 0.C. (TIP.) 1' CHAMFER ON (4) FOUR SIDES OF CURS WALL 4 RENA SPACED 1r 0.C. 2 CLEARANCE FRGSHHED GRADE -f4' YI =1 11= `-f,.� - -- 11 WO 1 • -II- � i STAR DETAIL ' FINISHED GRADE II_ 0 -III_ -1 11 -1 11 -1 I SIDE WALL SEE A80IS DETAIL 1/2' DIA RADIUS ON NOS (TIP.) //-- BROOM FINISH TREADS / FENDICUL88 TO TRAFFIC / 7RAFRC 93 REBAR AT NOSE OF TREAD (TIP.) r BAT T88 Io. /FT CONCRETE AT LANDING IN EMME) 0015 OF STARS 1/2' WIDE EXPANSION JOINT 08114 SEALANT. 21 X 3/8' DIA. STEEL DOME- MAT* SLEEVE MATERIALS VARY SEE PLANS FINISHED GRADE 11'Ill��fl.�.illl 7.111-111=i I 1I i= 04 ROAR SPACED 12• 0.0. 3' CLEARANCE REBAR OF O (TREADED 5: COMPACT 9JBGRADE „.-1. CHAMFER (4) FOUR EDGES OP CURB WALL RETAINING WALL SEE DETAIL A CONCRETE STAIR DETAIL NOT TO SCALE HANDRAIL OFFSET 1 1/2' FROM FACE OF WALL. (1) ONE PER SIDE OF STAIR SEE ABOVE DETAIL COORDINATE POST INSTALLATION TRTN CONCRETE TREADS STAR RISER (M.) PLAN 0 1' SOLO 50. TICKET TOP OF WALL 2` CLEAR (TIP.) 4' III rur SO. POST WITH MT POST CAP, M. / - ART MORK 2r 8 1(' RAIL /,-1/4" THICK 458505 PLATE AND ANCHOR 80LT -5EE NOTE 3 RAIL SECTION 1 1/j TIP. 4' 4' -Y 110188,0 GRADE SECTION C-C• FASTEN 51181 BRA0NP1 WHERE R4UNG ABUTS BUILDING. OE NOTE 4 1 TOP OF RAU. 1 R1LRA11£ PANEL NT-o" Naem SIAMARD PATE. 3'NS 50. POST 1' SOLID SC PICKET �� RNL TW. �� 2 -C INSIDE CA (APPROX.) am" NI111 W5ET ART WORT( I t 11 II MT POST CAP. TIP. 50. POST / 2$ 18 1}' ANL r1' SOUR SO. PICKET BRICK *EWER TEN 3 /E' WORTAR- COLOR TO RA701 BULLING CCPR;AT 808188 O FOR EPEE STANDING PIERS 93 IIISCNRY TIES 817 0.8. VERTICALLY AL SIDES (2) HOLES FOR STEEL 00W0S INTO CAP fd TIES 88-95 I4 1105000 (M) AND POURED CONCE E NEILL (2) 3/8 -111. T 4-N. LONG ST. STEE1. DOMES N 0011 10 INFL AND GRANITE �- MORTAR DOWEL TO GRANITE 5800114 FINISH PRECAST CONC. CAP INCLUDE ■1N0R SLOPE 10 DRAM AS APPROVED BY TT?. LANDSCAPE ARCHTECT I' CHAMPFER ALL (4) SOTS 1/C SAW CUT WIDOWS IN CONCAVE CAP ALL FOUR SOS BRIG( VENEER AROUND CONC. MIL 81114 3/8' MORTAR -CDLC TO BATCH DAUM POURED CONCRETE NFU/ 14 1E5 C.7 HLLY (M.) ORI2M. AND 95 WSDCA 93 L1ASO0Y 1S C12- 0.0 VERTICALLY BOTH SIDES �I!® R L__8 IfFA 24' - CONC FOOTING 1/4' ROM MANSON JONI AT SCAT AM ROAMING WALL NTERSEDTIOi5 (M.) PAW ENT TYPE VANES SEE PUNS DRAM 2 FINISHED CHAOS 5' -0' VAiriiMt 4. -3. TIP SECTION CAP AND BRICK PIER CONC. FOOTING DENS- GRADED CRU94ED STONE 81'181 PIEFA4 GONG PION CAP TOP W PROPOSD STAIRS WIWRINFMM R1RM■IM - -- 11•••111■in NR■MINII - ■•0• ■ - MMIUMI REMMI U1 MIRMIMMIMMI BOTTOM W PROPOSED SD I7' TIP. WALL, STAIR, PIER �VFVATION BRICK PIER DETAIL 3 NOT TO SCALE 06.2 316/1614X 1 /4• THICK WELDED PLATE AND ANCHOR BOLT-SEE NOTE 3 ' L CAP PLAN MENEM BIMI =NM ��'1' X • SUPPORTS. TYP DECDRAIIVE PANEL. AND MIT WO00 BADE OF 1/4 -1/2" S1ED- RAIL ELEVATION CONCRETE FOOTING *ERE -- 313/16 114X APPUCABLE TOP OF FOOTING SHALL 1 FLUSH MATH GRADE AND FORIAED TO BATCH DIBEN90N5 CE ADJACENT PAVERS -SEE LAYOUT PLAN AND PARETIA 1 TYPE SCHEDULE ORNAMENTAL RAILING DETAIL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 TYP.CA1. FREE STANDING PER MILL HAVE A FLUSH ROOMED UGHT FIXTURE AS S°ECR80 REWIRING WORM AND WRING TO In 0STAUED MINN THE PIER 0804 10 FILL-SEE DETAIL FOR LOCATION. CONTRACTOR 10 CWRONATE CONSTRUCTION MTH AL 9JB- CONTRACTORS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT c'LEVAT1ON FREE STANDING BR CK PIER WITH UGHT FUTURE PROPOSED 0401 PIER. FAILING. AND SCULPTURE 8458 -SEE DET018 THIS SHEET NOTE: ALL STEEL FENCE AM APPURTNANCFS SHAH 80 FREAAMFAC11RW 1101 DIP GALVAHEED. 000*8J AND *OBOE COATED N COLOR APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. FULL RED ALL SEAMS AM GEOID 91001. AS SPECIFIED. PROPOSED RE'TANING WALL WTH VENEER -SEE DEM. THIS SHEET OUTDOOR AREA RIMED GRADE r 24' NOTES: TOP OF WALL OR RNL94ED GRADE 1. FINISH OF RARING MALL BE POYA'11 COATED. C0.0R RR FINISH SHALL 440.1771 COLOR CR BNLDWG AWNING AND WINDOW CASINGS COORDINATE COLOR W1H THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR 70 FABRICATION. DECORATIVE PANEL TO 80 REPEATED EVERY FIFTH PANEL. P41100N TO BEGIN WT/4 TWO STANDARD PANELS. ONE DECORATIVE PANES. FOUR 5TAN0AR0 PANELS. ETC. AND ENDING MTH TWO STANDARD PANELS. COORDINATE 081)4 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOCATION 00 PANELS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. DECORAIV< PANEL NOT SHOWN AND WILL BE 5.1818)8100 BY DINE CITY'S FENCE 008GT1 REPRESENTATIVE (SEA) UPON AVA1LABIUTT. 3. ATTACH POSTS TO TOP OF RETAINING WALL PATH 3 /e DIAMETER X 5' LONG NOT DIPPED ZINC C0A1O THREADED ROD, WASHER, AND NUTS. 807701 OF POST SHALL COMM //4' THICK FULL SEAM MOM PLATE W ACCEPT (4) R005. (2) EACH SIDE OF POST. 4. 1/4' 1111041 X 1'MO 2'L L -SHAPED POUNDER COATED STEEL BRACKET. MELD BRACKET TO TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL AND FASTEN TO FACE OF BUILDING WALL WITH NOT DIPPED ZINC COATED MASONRY BOLTS MTh EIKPAN85! SHOWS. 5. 9N0P DRAWINGS OP FENCE. 5VANG GATE, LAIC*. LOCK. A536LY. AND FINAL ART WORK TO BE PROVIDED TO 1HE LANDSCAPE ARCHRE01 AND FINAL REVIEW BY 111E OMNER. - 24' FIRMED GRADE .1 i l'14- - ' 14981 -II E L.�� -��-,, IrI- -II�1E CONCRETE SEAT WALL DETAIL 100T TO SCALE CHAMFER (M. PON BOTH SIDES) PLAZA 0f c0.- MAIEMALS VARY BM LAYOUT PLAIN 1'X1 /2. COP REVEAL (RABIC YA1K 58E ORI) 3000 P9 OCNCRE10 94 113 812' HORD:MTN- ANO 4-95 TIES VERTICALLY (M.) 51_0 PLANS FOR PAVEMENT TIRE 1 1/r LAYER SAM SETTING BID DENS; GRADED COSHED STONE COMPACTED SIRRtA5E NOTE 1. SEE WALL LAYOUT PLAN FOR 000004INE =ENDOWS 5. NERVY WALL DIMENSIONS WITH GRADING AND LWDSCAPE ARON.0Z R PRIOR TD 185TH LA1001. 3. MULL EXPANSON JOKE SPACED 30' 0.0. AS OWNED. FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IAUEn •.VE.TIK.AAW11n>0NGNBRSNIAMNBS ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER AA. HARTFORD MMECT Todu.Idn dc. I rb, catty MO HO 0081 AisEax i I ATA PP Pwm4 a AN aL n, Mna Am kat1 ®<bW *841 I Wks! utlPW rRPM Sawr Fgr. ly®e AV MIDI CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC ss1EDDENN MOUTH E 521ENN 18 SURE:19 fx 59-7161200 PRO3ECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PARKWAY ISSUE: 8-18-68 - CITY REVIEW ST 8-98 -66 - MD ST C., REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SITE DETAILS II SHEET NUMBER: C6.2 • L7) C• !1[ 0 ly 011,31. RUM t 0•s f/,•' - ji —tea re Mar 52 ROM VaINV t MP VI L 1RNS • -E 2'0• c 9 a O *In r P•-5• , 9 , -,, /n ACCUbGy 105 ,'$ 0 • "99. 1104 1 $11 r r31 for zJl' PNVAftDJ A11EA 1 1 FPSiFLOOPwrr seise v + ° -ra• i-0 i 2.79\ / ti�e�+e99om • PININREA 1 , wreuw, wv»re \\, �mrwbwZ.wob ' -2 \\ chiod [FA FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .11.117 ,A9.1A,FORD GOP NE II . A.DD1eLT9,elcNersEJa9er CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 1]1900207002 WE 02224720029922 91R9E:11D P2: 94796111,0 PROJECT: BE I IY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN UNITA PARKWAY ISSUE 11-15 -00 - 01Y RPM eE7 1-70-05 -MD0E2 L REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE: MAIN LEVEL PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Al. MEMCAL /ONCE Mb" M2PTOICQ2 2,0" XIMENt. 'Cr WOW.. tallUNt -124 E>12-1, '0 (1E)MEZZAWE FLOCE FUN Wu I/ •- ISO LEI J b • • • ■ ' • CON0.161■710,35,14RIKK. 6110MNE MC.ARMIELISMAGINEOVKANNERS ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 16koup /...,5114t1 na .1.74.7aa 0.14.1..a. CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS-a, LLC 111110 91461£11.£1.. EDEN MAIM Mx SUITF.NO 951,746.0 PROJECT: BE i Y'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOINN CBSTER PARKWAY IS_SUE: 11-1E-05 - CR( MEE* SET 1-13-011 SID SET G REV. THIS SW SHEET TULE: MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN SHEET NUMBER: FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A1.2 FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOP wrrmm ,r. sc+e+ova YOM1 mMN Nereeeo/MA u,N,n Pah lef0115 /6 YEWEn ®KC/OP R.N4 H/lle 1/1" Frttwollivc UM, mevitUf sartromcs COMM.; WATFORD anus ecunmecrseeemYmwr®s ARCHITECT /ENGINBFR PLANNER HARTFORD kROUP n/k>NC. I CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC MOO 5IN0.RRIEf WlE CM PRAM, lW 94.7464M PROJECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CDMER PARKWAY ISSUE: e -rs-os - CUT Ktr¢W sct s-m-as - ao set L REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ROOF LEVEL PLAN SHEET NUMBER: , MEN/IAr. W1iPoM KEh5VM11 IRIM O/ so▪ mpeollr W/ 95WiW.� M. /55MM aMEHL paw EP hSmDCS(rr x(07.5 M51,1rAaoArasa nzi. mE MAI ElfU 7r — iMMULAMP /rartawL MALMO" 5505.50M MUM .410 mlrEewl -PEP MIME, ROW. z/ MOM ""--awWUro�LE h5Ame,Wf5(AQUfnALE nSWAW. S. (AWN W/utasm ( K/bh(LI.IE 4 sxW: eaw la'b lW.044 FPi- EGLR ®NNW Rt:Olrrc —_ a 501.111-1ELEVAIt 1( TOIMWJ1ER PA?:WAY) t/13- - no• tREICI MUTIxAnP MnNCUR rm/WssAIfDlxM /1116A5 MIAMPLMwu J6.. EE51/554155/ 5WRLRYEPP. 4/1 ENTRY ELEVATION (SEE AAA1 YNF 1/1'•1'4 a II MRR iii ll, 11111 II • REROanPRWNWN 0/(1(1551600/6E A. - A5t ELEVATI Betty's Pies ImMC51 /5MamcNAL MWRPPGr naturaIs(ML10k9 5.555551/St KM/ /MG£ /�aMENIl01E WAMMITY / fh5 L0.G4' /.' • Mr/PMJCAMGRVIMMA S OEF3 OMW/ AMA,. .55/55/54]10 rvI /A5MMPRavw09 MM/MAIEMM1W. —f/MAK L019EPKM/ 51123rw0511w /HNIAING E0.0MOK -EOLatl MA101 6.555.=5RLH9 5/052M7f I40211 ELEVARON PAM 1.00 • 4 — S 014IWUawDa (0/654' FelM(A155/501M.M. MYNA. /---M/M50555.50//17M R (K JI sSAH(sE 0/ c•1 C MEZZNJIE NEST ELEVATION �aaEHlwSwxaea®cc EY5 faLO %' fra/MMAI IAMM II MfMreA,11M MIAMI IMMIIMSPAMMIOL frIMNAMMJSMIALL A¢ELL f/5051rm. news 5 aM1191 WMlHIEOGE Elf 5041/5/ 1(07111(7001 VOMMMAIFUMMU PAT555515/05115M 6Ew51/5rLn IFM5r 5MMEgSWMLAiKP07 fh501/05 ( Kam63LE C') SCUMEAST ELEVAIION ( TANI EMEP.PA%WAY) mrrmanPRUnawa W.f.! V./ 6EWaY. QAS5A5/P MEP LEM.11015W /urGYNOE ke5044(5l ACM MOE // L1 ELY. 56-91 07VMACC MI • raoevwra 5910/ VWEPEEg01'M1' PwMePEHMLnr IAE9fW -rNP1 Ark /6 MOM AUM7f.0 NORM EAST ELEVA11 J (PAT .00 MU VS- -Ib" F.EfWIiE ktn. 6AEt1101EW.w.6OFM 000.V7Ee7LE'A' FUMINUMOILIMMIA . ware rve 51AHG 6A...SPEErE0 1 /— r6FIMPEP/er, r•MHl;. -,APL wpm pprA Mho uHq WR EORDIR ,< race a• NORTHEAST COMER ELEVA KAU I/6••14• —.MP. OU R1nPLr PPP GALP m 7En149E1100 L0 tPNHP; (Alfuf[WY NE5T ELEVATION (MEN PANE) Betty's "a1075(7b WALL U EYE WL40' MALE W6•' - r0' MEZZMME WM1 WESTELEVA110N rwPA(ah HMm■MHEP W06PIWUPwv MVO, PMNC AMA ELEVA11014 ( L/X N NEST) I! 9'1 :010117W14000195 5 KaIHLa(. a Ka. 0/q wORNIF,En [WIZ AREAELEV.(L00-JNC,NE) II1 dal 12NR4G AREA ELEV.(L0216 `.E) FOR BID ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C clxwrHrnes, Norm mow NE. Ira mocrECrsm arse nmems ARCHITECT /ENGINOR PLANNER HARTFORD KiROUP A/E UTC. CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100 SOMME LORE MEN PMWE,MN SVI.E:Lm PH: 992P1f•LIW PRO]ECT: BETTY'S PIES OF LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER PNU WAY 1-1a -m - arc NMI KT 9-26es - .o sEr L, REV. THIS SFlT SHEET TI ILE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A3.1 • , , , i / , k AIN% ‘44. ■ ■► •_ 4°W.PAV■ ■■ ■■ ■ //, gant§k. 1.11111111 111.111•11 1/45•4■ ice:, ■U '� fi z•N 40 1 "4-4" P00 • 10440\ 4tA■ .41164tek Iffry‘ 41041*. I • \A4 4Ir • 4r iON0A Vik gut► y Om/ ow /. _ 4 40 • REMOVABLE WASTE CONTAINER AND CIGARETTE DISPOSE CONTAINER ORNAMENTAL FENCE WITH 4' WIDE PEDESTRIAN GATE. EXIT ONLY SIGN PAVEMENT TYPE II: 12 "X12" PAVER STACK PATTERN LIGHT SAND NATURAL BLEND COLOR AND TEXTURE e41.4 4 *IP Per ■ lik foft•P ovime ■Pria■ /44., 4-4 ■ v* e . -.. lea,47:\ 4-4-ime- � mill►\ r. ift 9 ,N)4\ M AI► WAI� �R ► % �� • ,�� STATION • ��,�._ S H,Airjr AV", , ' A/Wwioli >4.L114:44g1111.-1) t "4> ■AleAk ‘ 4, / 9. .""°11 • \ ..41■44 SO it ltii , 4 * .4 ) 1 1/4 ;?‘ 4 4 Weil 4 +4411■0# *+ .r# '' 4 ## S• , 4,* -4i4 44 4ee *04944'1 &N. ' .101/4 \ A , -V 4m0 ,.. /vA#*#i*** ›* _/*** • e ♦ 4, 4 /• V ,0 ' # . , 444* itp A.- - Si OUTDOOR DINING AREA APPROX. 58 SEATS NOTES: 1. TABLE SIZES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY OWNER. 2. ALL EXTERIOR FURNITURE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE OUTDOOR DINING AREA DURING RESTRICTED DATES AND STORED BY THE OWNER IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY THE CITY. PAVEMENT BAND: 4 "X8" (1) COLUMN SOLDIER COURSE DARK GRAY ORNAMENTAL BAND EXTERIOR LIGHTING SEE CITY SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS PAVEMENT TYPE III: 4 "X8" PAVER HERRINGBONE PATTERN 45' TO PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC RED /BLACK BLEND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY 2' WIDE SERPENTINE SHAPED CONCRETE SEATING WALL. APPROXIMATELY 24" HIGH RETAINING WALL AND ORNAMENTAL FENCE- APPROXIMATE GRADE DIFFERENE IS 4.5' 4 SEAT ROUND TABLE WITH 36" ACCESSIBLE PERIMETER CONCRETE STAIR WITH ORNAMENTAL RAILING AND LIGHTING 1 /8" = 1 '- 0" 4 2 0 © COPYRIGHT 2005 HARTFORD GROUP A/E, INC. HARTFORD GROUP A/E INC Architecture - Engineering - Planning 12100 Singletree Lane, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Ph: (952)746-1200 - Fax: (952)746 -1201 Project Title: OUTDOOR DINING AREA - SITE PLAN BETTY'S PIES REtEIVEb LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES, MN. OCT 0 5 2005 • �i?v LIMvu aAAt q Project No.: RTL01 10 -4 -05 Page No: 1/1 • AGENDA ITEM V.B.3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: October 12, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plan — Lakewood Apartments Legacy at Woods Edge BACKGROUND The Hartford Group has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for an apartment building with first floor multi- tenant retail within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the apartment building as well as the final plat for the lot (Village No. 4). One of the goals of the mixed use downtown is to provide a variety of housing types and costs to meet life cycle housing needs that are not currently available in Lino Lakes. The development agreement between the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (EDA) and Hartford Group, the developer of the workforce housing, includes housing covenants. Those housing covenants include an affordability clause that requires that 20 �*percent of the housing units built on the development property as a whole must meet affordability requirements. f that 20 percent, 67 percent must be rental units that meet the income and rent requirements for federal low - income tax credits. This 60 -unit workforce rental housing meets the 67 percent requirement. In addition, affordable rental housing must meet the following requirements: 1. The developer must retain an experienced, professional property manager, approved in writing by the EDA. 2. The management agreement must require that the manager will use resident selection criteria that include evidence that tenants have income to support their rental rate, rental history showing timely payment of rent, and criminal background checks. 3. The management agreement must include a plan for long -term maintenance and repair of the property. The Planning and Zoning Board continued this item at the September 14th regular meeting, and offered up comments to both staff and the developer about the proposal. Numerous revisions have been made to the plans and are addressed throughout this report. ANALYSIS Governing Plans This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit *Development for the site. `r Lakewood Apartment, page 2 �The layout generally follows the original layout, though the lots have been slightly modified to accommodate he proposed apartment building. The layout of the entire block is shown on the site plan. The site has been reorganized to allow a commercial /office building to the west of the apartment building and one to the north along the Interstate 35W frontage. It is a reduction in the overall building area that will be built in the area and is therefore substantially conforming to the original layout. Lakewood Apartments is located in a Mixed Use Land Use area and is located on Lot 10 and 11 in Block B. Acceptable Building Types are Commercial /Retail /Office/Housing. The proposed apartment building will include underground parking, first floor retail and apartments, and three additional floors of apartments for a total of 60 units within the four story structure. The use of ground floor as residential (apartments) is not fully in conformance with the guidelines; however, since the portion of the building where this is being done is along a residential street across from future townhomes, staff finds it acceptable to permit a small number of units on the mixed -use streetside. The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates a build -to line for this portion of that block which will require that the building be close to the edge of the street to create an intimate pedestrian environment. The Regulating Plan does not indicate any `Required Building Entries' on this site, nor any `Gateways'. The site is identified for a `Architectural Feature' at the southeast corner near the traffic roundabout. This will be discussed in more detail within the Architectural Standards section of the report. III/Allowable Uses The proposed use for this site is residential apartment units above first floor retail. The Lino Lakes Town Center Development & Design Guide classifies these uses as General Merchandise Retail and Residential Units Above Ground Floor Commercial; and considers them permissible uses within the Mixed Use District. The applicable section is included below: SECTION 3.1 ALLOWABLE USES Table 1. Allowable Land Uses in Mixed -Use Commercial, Commercial Residential and Civic Districts Allowable Land Use Comm ercial Mixed Use Civic Commercial Uses General merchandise retail, including but not limited to: variety, hardware, and dry goods stores, but excluding vending machine operators and direct selling organizations. Must be less than 40,000 s.f. footprint. P P - Residential Uses Residential units above ground -floor commercial space (e.g. retail or employment), including "live work units." - P - TABLE 1 NOTES: P = permitted use • Lakewood Apartment, page 3 .Building Massing & Placement The proposed building is within a portion of the development that requires build -to lines; specifically for this site a maximum 5 foot setback is prescribed. This standard requires a minimum of 70% of the block to meet the build -to lines, with up to 20% can be plaza/park areas. Though the build -to line is not technically being met, the developer has followed the spirit and intent of the guidelines to the best of their abilities and has delivered what staff feels is the best possible compromise on this site. The central element of the proposed building is shown right at the 5 foot setback line, then the building tapers out as it proceeds both to the west and the north. The west wing of the building must be stepped back due to the grade differences between the site and the streetscape, as well as the provision of underground parking. The developer has effectively mitigated this situation by providing a plaza that runs the entire length of the west wing of the building which provides a separate walkway to access the buildings with periodic stairways and landscaped planters to break up the monotony of the sidewalk area. On the north wing of the building the step back is necessary because of the residential use along the first floor. Within residential districts buildings are allowed a 15 foot setback meeting build -to lines. Since the apartments are a residential use, and the residential project across the street will be allowed to be setback to the 15 feet, staff supports this minor deviation as an effort to create continuity along the streetscape. The developer has included a `pocket park' that will be accessible to the occupants of the residential units within the entire building. The proposed building will be built at an overall height ranging from 49 to 51 feet, including the grade differential between the streetscape and the site. This exceeds the maximum height of 45 feet, however the additional height is in the form of parapet walls which are allowed to exceed the 45 foot height standard up to •10 additional feet. Architectural Standards The relationship between the building and the street is required to be accentuated by expressive wall faces, with a minimum of 60% of the wall face being windows, doors, or arcades. The proposed elevations meet or exceed all of those requirements. The streetscape relationship is also accentuated by the use of landscaping planters within the plaza area attached to the west wing of the building. This will act as a clear separation between those using the public streetscape for transportation purposes versus those using the private sidewalk to gain access to the building itself. The primary entrances for all of the commercial uses, and secondary entrances for the residential uses will be provided along the front of the building. Secondary access for the commercial and the primary access for the residential portion of the building will be located on the rear of the building adjacent to the parking area. As previously mentioned above, the Regulating Plan identifies an architectural feature at the southeast corner of this site near the roundabout. The standards do not specifically define what format an architectural feature is supposed to take, but it does identify clock towers, bell towers, cupolas, trellises, and ornamental portions of parapet walls as architectural features in other portions of the text. The purpose of the architectural feature at this location is to attract the eye of pedestrians and create a point of visual interest. The central portion of the apartment building attempts to accomplish this by being stepped closer to the streetscape and with its height differentiation from the surrounding portions of the building. Staff is including a condition requiring the •developer to further accentuate the corner with some additional architectural element. Lakewood Apartment, page 4 SThe base of the structure is clearly articulated through the use of masonry materials throughout. The base also helps to define the separation between the uses, as the entire commercial portion of the building is composed of masonry materials, while only the first five feet of the residential portion of the building is finished with masonry materials. The top is also clearly articulated with the use of strong cornice feature that crowns the majority of the building. This cornice is especially accentuated by the contrasting color depicted. Due to the vast horizontal length of this building the architect has used a variety of fenestrations and stepped portions of the building to break up the elevation effectively. This stepping both on the wall face as well as the parapet walls requires that the cornice element also vary. Portions of the building have varied the location of the cornice, or even eliminated the cornice all together to provide a greater differentiation between the sections of the building. The parapet walls will provide an adequate screening device for the roof mounted equipment that will be required for this type of use. The building materials proposed for the site include a variety of decorative masonry units and cementitious wall board. Additional trim is provided in the form of canvas canopies, aluminum balcony railings, a variety of storefronts, and the aluminum cornice element. All of these materials meet the stringent standards of the design guidelines, and are incorporated consistently throughout the building's elevations. The proposed structure has integrated a couple of climatic response devices that meet the design guidelines. Daylighting of the interior space is being achieved through the large number of windows provided. Sheltering *ay be accomplished with the use of canvas or metal canopies over the store fronts, and a main lobby area for the residential area. The building integrates all of the necessary service areas into the building including the trash handling area, which is accessed through the parking garage under the building. The recycling and trash handling plan for this site still needs to be reviewed by city staff to determine if it is adequate. This review must occur prior to the City Council review of the project. Because this particular building has so many windows, attention and detail to the quality of the windows is important. The design standards require a reveal of at least 2 inches from the exterior trim to create shadow for visual interest rather than windows and trim flush with the building. Sometimes this shadow can be created with solid window trim as is depicted on the submitted plans. A condition is included with staff's recommendations to require a minimum two inch thick exterior trim be applied to all windows of this building. Given this buildings height, it's visibility from the village green; and the numerous windows provided; the internal window treatments are also of particular concern. Staff has recommended a condition addressing the provision of uniform treatments that will complement the architectural style of the building. Parking Requirements • Lakewood Apartment, page 5 Peak Hour Demand Factor Parking Required Parking Provided Surplus etail 4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 13,140 s.f. 53 113 196 (surface & underground) 83 Residential 2 per unit 120 units 60 Per Chapter 3.5 of the guidelines, the City is maintaining a shared parking analysis for the entire development. This analysis identifies peak parking demands at key times throughout the day. In the case of apartments the peak period is 10 PM on both weekdays and weekends. The peak periods for retail uses are identified as 1 PM on weekends. The peak period for the combined uses is 8 PM on both weekdays and weekends. Lakewood Apartments Use Parking Peak Parking Provided Surplus Retail 53 (1 PM Weekends) 148 (8 PM Weekdays and Weekends) 196 (surface & underground) 48 Residential 57 (10 PM Weekdays and Weekends) wThe proposed use is clearly being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout and underground arking that the applicant has proposed with this application. Entire Block Single Use Peak Hour Demand Parking Peak (1 PM Weekdays) Parking Provided Surplus Varies 200 237 (surface, underground, and on- street) 37 There are approximately 41 on- street parking spaces that can be dedicated to this block within the development, this number might be adjusted slightly as the construction of the city improvements are not complete, however, it is clear that this block is currently meeting parking standards. The shared parking spreadsheet is based on the Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking Standards and as is required by the Development and Design Guidelines. As always, staff will continue to review each project to maintain the parking standards within this block as well as the entire development. Staff has included a condition requiring that the developer work with staff to identify an appropriate location for bicycle parking facilities on this block. landscaping Requirements Lakewood Apartment, page 6 AkThe submitted plans meet all of the landscaping requirements of Chapter 3.6. The site plan indicates a total of 136 parking spaces within the surface parking lot. This means that the 16 trees provided throughout the lot exceeds the requirement of 1 tree for every 10 parking spaces. The parking lot abuts Interstate 35W, therefore plantings must occur that `screen' the metal security fence. The proposed landscape plan does depict deciduous trees spaced 60 feet on center, accentuated with coniferous trees; however staff is adding a condition that a minimum of four shrubs be added per tree to this landscape planter to provide adequate screening. The shrubs shown on the planting pallet should be used, and should be spread evenly throughout the planter area. The 136 total surface parking spaces provided in this lot does not meet or exceed the threshold of 300 spaces which would require the implementation of connecting walkways throughout the parking lot. All of the landscaping materials proposed as a part of the planting palette for the site satisfy the comments of the Environmental Board as well as city staff. Lighting The photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. The parking lot fixtures do not meet city standards and are being conditioned to be replaced by shoebox fixtures. The parking lot lighting that will be used for this phase of development must be repeated throughout this block, if not throughout the entire Legacy at Woods Edge project area. A condition is also included requiring a revised lighting plan that indicates the revised fixtures and the revised location of the luminaire located near the north entrance drive. This luminaire must be moved further to the east to avoid •he garage entrance. The building itself will include some architectural and building entry lights mounted directly to the building. These fixtures will be used to highlight the building massing and will enhance the pedestrian environment. Engineering The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and a memorandum including all of their comments is attached to the report. Any outstanding issues will be addressed through the site performance agreement and building permit process prior to construction. Final Plat The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) is attached to the same agenda as a separate item, and a condition will be added to this review that the final plat must be approved prior to City Council approval for this building. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the August 31st regular meeting. Their comments are attached and many were addressed in the landscaping portion of the staff report. Additionally, the board was concerned with the recycling program for the apartment complex. Staff will include a condition requiring that a full recycling plan be submitted prior to this item being scheduled for a City Council meeting. OPTIONS 1. Approve the Final Plan for Lakewood Apartments 2. Deny the Final Plan for Lakewood Apartments 3. Return to Staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION • • Lakewood Apartment, page 7 The submitted plans are in substantial conformance with the standards of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Final Plan for Betty's Pies, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The `gull wing' fixture (type EE and EE1 as shown on sheet C4.1) shall be changed to a shoebox fixture. This fixture type will need to be approved by staff and used throughout the rest of the parking area on this block, if not the rest of the project site. 5. A revised lighting plan indicating the above required fixture changes, and the relocation of the luminaire near the north entrance drive further east to avoid a conflict with the garage opening must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. 6. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 7. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. 8. A full recycling plan must be submitted for staff review prior to this item being heard by the City Council. 9. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim must be provided in accordance with the development standards for the site. 10. The developer is required to add an additional architectural element to the central portion of the building to further strengthen the presence of the corner. 11. All units within the residential portion of the building are required to be supplied with uniform internal window treatments that will complement the architecture of the building. 12. The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate four shrubs per tree within the north planter island (adjacent to the Interstate 35W right -of -way). ATTACHMENTS 1. S.E.H. memorandum dated October 6, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the August 31, 2005 meeting. 3. Lakewood's Apartments plan set received September 27, 2005. SEH October 6, 2005 Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Lakewood Apartments Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.10 14.00 Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Lakewood Apartments site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on October 2, 2005. Site Layout and Paving Plan (Sheet C2.0) 1. Place handicap accessible parking signs in front of the accessible parking stall rather than the accessible parking aisle 2. A street light is shown in the SW corner of the parking lot. This light should be moved out of the parking lot and into the island behind the curb to the north. Erosion Control and Grading Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. Silt fence needs to be shown around the perimeter of the construction zone. 2. The trench drain outlet pipe, as shown, will conflict with the water main. A note should be placed on the plans to indicate the water main should be installed deeper at the crossing to avoid this conflict. 3. The main line of storm sewer from CBMH -106 to FES -100 appears to be considerably deeper than needed. This results in the need for large diameter pipe at very shallow slopes and will make construction difficult due to the deep trenches. It is recommended that this storm sewer be revised to reduce the unnecessary depth, which will then allow increased slopes and reduced pipe sizes. 4. Hydrology calculations should be done to verify that the grate capacity of CBMH -108 is sufficient for the amount of runoff it will receive. Two catch basins may be required in this location to handle the amount of runoff generated in a 10 -year storm event. 5. The sanitary sewer note stating, "Connect to existing stub. IE= 893.61" should instead have an invert of 892.61 instead. 6. It is recommended that the water main in the northern end of the site be revised to have an 8 "x8" cross connecting the service stub, hydrant, and water main loop which runs through the proposed Woods Edge Hotel site rather than the two 8 "x8" tees currently shown. 7. An 8" gate valve should be installed on the water main run leading to the Woods Edge Hotel site. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite B, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax • • • Mr. Michael Grochala September 2, 2005 Page 2 Please call me at 651.765.2912 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Stefan T. Higgins, PE Project Engineer ko' lino! 'O305 10` plan review 6kcwoodopts l 00603 - signed.doc • • Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board August 31, 2005 Legacy at Woods Edge Lakewood Apartments: Plant Schedule: Crimson King maple should be changed to a species that is a bit more zone appropriate and non - invasive. Suggest changing this species to one of the following -- Northern Pin Oak, Red Oak, Bur Oak, Autumn Blaze Maple, Hackberry, American Linden, and Green Ash. Suggest changing the Colorado Blue Spruce to White Spruce or Norway Spruce. Caution and care should be taken to ensure vehicular sit -lines are not obstructed. Trees should be at least 30 feet from street corners. Eastem Red Cedars proposed for the NE corner of the building may be too close. Sod areas must be shown as irrigated. All top soils should be described as incorporated into the sub soil for several inches. Erosion Control The developer should submit an erosion control plan that details NPDES requirements and is acceptable to the City. The plan and inspections reports for • this plan must be located on site with an indicated location on the plan. Recycling There should be a plan for organized recycling within the apartment building. Developer should work with staff on landscaping. Work with a waste service provider to make sure the plan is functional. Encourage a recycling plan. Motion by Kukonen, second by O'Connell to recommend approval with staff and Environmental Board comments and recommendations. All were in favor. Motion was approved. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 1 Mn} sK51165l 4, don sRrdm6^ fet .m rammed q o o Ire mK mart n9miem m4 Mal i nn a 911 Um. LcWga Added mtln Fe 4s M Wm ebb at Um*. 9We 9ebKl lm+W.29321 CONSULTANT OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC MOO Main/E.! EDEN NaNN.mK. P 46.1209 PRO3ECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 08/15/05 CRY SUBMITTAL 09/27/05 984 PG CRY L REV. THIS SHEET NO REV, THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE: SITE LAYOUT AND PAVING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C2.0 Ma OM 119. 65 1ST FL RETAIL 14,600 S.F. 1ST -4TH FL. RESIDENTIAL (60 UNITS) + 1ST FL.: 9,300 S.F. 2ND -4TH: 22,300 S.F. PER FLOOR SITE: 115,139 S.F. (2.64 ACRE) FIN t l4 4 fittf CONCRETE WALK DETAIL NOT TO SCALE I /2" W x 3/4" D TOOLED CONTROL JOINT (MAX. 3' O.C. rm.) W/ 1/4" RAD6. 1.1044 BROOK RNISH �— PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFIC WRH E2 WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED 5" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED 91.6 X W1.6 WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS AS SPECIFIED 6' CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 2. l/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AT CURBS. 3. WIRE MESH REQUIRED FOR WALKS 6' WIDE OR IN LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULAR 1RAFT1C. . —LEVEL LANDING 150 hA".7 / MAX. CROSS SLOPE 'ry J / FOR DRAINAGE ' ] R MA/ ? IMX/ t, 'o/ 5.00' MIN ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SEP 2 7 2005 CCTV F N.. O LAKES 1" WEARING COURSE TACK COAT S BASE COURSE B" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE I���Irl COMPACTED -=11001 5UBGRA06 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE I/2" RADIUS—, FlNI HED GRADE -The = 30' 3' RADIUS F.5RB6(1fER SLOPE GUTTER 3/4"/1' — CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENT 5106ES AWAY FROM CURB CURB AND GUTTER (8618) DETAIL NOT TO 5041.E 5 0 NOTE: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10' -0" O.C. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS FINISHED GRADE LAYOUT AND PAVING —Op- t CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE PAIN CITY ORDINANCE. 2. LOCATIONS OF 019401URE5. ROADWAY PAVEMENT$, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS. AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. DECORATIVE PAVER UNITS AND LAYOUT SHALL BE STAKED N THE FIELD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY 11-15 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT COLORS AND MATERIALS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY 100@ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDINGS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 5. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL ENTRANCES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDINANCE. 6. PARKING STALLS SHALL BE STRIPED WITH A 4" MADE WHITE PAINTED UNE. ACCESSIBLE ACCESS AISLES SHALL RE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE PANTED LINE; IS" ON CENTER AND AT 45' ANGLES TO THE STALL. STOP LINES SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE. T. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE EXISTING BENCHMARK AS INDICATED ON THE SURVEY/EXISTING CONDITIONS DRAWING. SIGN SCHEDULE: ®HANDICAPPED PARKING (1 -348) & $200 FINE (1 -39), VAN ACCESSIBLE (R7 -84) MOUNT BELOW SIGN A ® NO PARKING, LOADING ZONE © RESDENT PARKING ONLY ® STOP SIGN (RI -1) INSTALL POSTS INTO 1 3/8" DIA. CORE HOLE / 1W111 NON -SHRINK GROUT, CROWN FOR DRAINAGE. SEAL AS SPECIFIED (TYP.) 8 "W CONCRETE 510E WALL HEIGHT SHALL BE RUSH WITH NOSE OF STAIR SPACE POSTS EQUALLY. 4' -O" MAXIMUM 0.0. 1 1/2" DIA BRUSHED ALUMINUM POSTS AND RAIL. 1/4" SEAM WELD JOINTS. FURNISH AND INSTALL RAILING TO MATCH SLOPE OF STAIR 18 "I1I_I1 .ii I— _ —1 1 1 =1 1 1=1 I RAILING OETAR. SECTION A -A' -� lIr I/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT WITH SEALANT. 2 "L X 3/6" DA. STEEL DOWEL PATH SLEEVE MATERIALS VARY SEE PLANS 6' DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE FINISHED GRADE p4 REBAR SPACED 36" 0.C. (TYP.) 1" CHAMFER ON (4) FOUR SIDES OF CURB WALL #4 REBAR SPACED 12" O.C. 3" CLEARANCE FINISHED GRADE -.IL - I 1 7. =11 TIE -1 I 1 -1 I I ,11. 0DE WALL SEE ABOVE DETAIL iDU O/2" N DIA. N OSE (TYRAPI.) S BROOM FINISH TREADS PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC 43 REBAR AT NOSE OF TREAD (TV.) 1" BATTER TIP. I ROPE 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT WITH SEALANT. 2 "L X 3/8" DIA STEEL DOWEL WITH SLEEVE MATERIALS VARY _m ( rSEE PLANS GRADE 44 REBAR SPACED 12" O.C. 3" CLEARANCE M4 REBAR (i ) PER NOSE OF TREAD CCMPACT SUB0RADE 1 5" CHAMFER (4) FOUR EDGE5 OF CURB W4LL 8"H X 6 "W CONCRETE WALL �— HANDRAIL CENTERED WITHIN WAIL, (1) ONE PER SIDE OF STAIR SEE ABOVE DETAIL STAIR RISER (TV.) PLAN CONCRETE STAIR DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 61 03•n 0811 MA. KMTIOD PAM 504 PC IROMMISIDRaiNIPSARIAMP9 OMMERCIAL BLDG: 7,000 S.F. SITE: 9,025 S.F (®±a1 ACR Is o 3o SEP 2 7 2005 U N O, L A NK'. FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE yAIl,� SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. Ti METAL POST V AS SPECIFIED. SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4' x 4' WIRE HOOKED ONTO PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. EXISTING GROUND SURFACE CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE RUNOFF � –� ty, CATCH BASIN FILTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2 C3.0 FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CUPS 12'O.C. ANCHOR FABRIC WITH 501L, TAMP BACKFlLL / 1 DIRECTION OF ROW `7.1177 METAL POSTS 5' -0' O.C. MAX. 44- EROSION CONTROL NOTES: -4- 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 5EOWIENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS IN ADDITION TO OTHER MEASURES THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIMTIE5 IN ACCORDANCE TO THE 001 ORDINANCE 2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE 5EDIM041400N AND EROSION CONTROL 5Y5TEM5 THROUGHOUT 1140 DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. THIS MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE CLEA4NG AND /OR REPLACING SYSTEMS THAT HAVE BECOME CLOGGED OR NO LONGER FUNCTIONAL AS DEIERMINE0 BY THE ENGNEER/LANOSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT MONTHLY AND AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO INSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM. WRAP 1/4" WIRE NE54 AROUND SIDES OF BOX AND ATTACH TO FRAME. FILL WITH 1/2" -1' DIAMETER WASHED STONE REPLACE WHEN SATURATED WITH SEDIMENT. LECTED 5EDIMENT (LA 264 WOOD FRAME OUTSIDE 00 INLET WN AREAS) COLU 'I�Tf l��I GRADE GRATE INLET FILTER BAG BETWEEN FRAME AND GRATE CATCH BASIN INLET NOTE: 1) IN LAWN AREAS; USE MESH. WOOD FRAME BOX, AND STONE FOR INLET PROTECTION (NO BAG REQUIRED) 2) IN PAVED AREAS, USE FILTER BAG FOR INLET PROTECTION ( NO MESH, BOX STONE REOUIRE0) '0' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10' SPACING, 4' DOWN FROM TRENCH 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4' OR MORE IN DEPTH 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 4' AND 5TAPLE. 'POVERFAL1 TT EROSION STOP: FOLD OF y MATTING BURIED IN SILT,•• TRENCH AND TAMPED • OOUBLEROW OF STAPLES /� PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET — APART TO NUR MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TO CONSTRUCRO AREA / 0 NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL 25' R PLAN TO CONSTRUCTION AREA FINISHED GRADE 6' 1.1I6 CRUSHED STONE 75' MINIMUM 25' R 0 EXISTING UNDISTURBED 000100TILE FILTER FABRIC ROADWAY NOTES: PROFILE PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CON5TRUC0ON ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION YA41CH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED. WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 0 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND SATISFACTORY DISPOSAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK AND 5OL STABILIZA0ON AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 30 L.F. OF ALT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE OUTLET OF EACH STORM DRAIN PIPE TO CONTROL AND MINIMIZE SILT RUNOFF. LEGEND: 419 490 + 422.0 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 5' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION ALT FENCE N%r JSYxI LIMITS OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OUTFALL GUTTER 41-- GRADING NOTES: -0- 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATON OF CONSTRUCTION TO E5TABL191 PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO LOANING AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 2. UNSUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL, AS SPECIFIED, SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED 00 BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF –SITE. 3. SUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED IN A MANNER AND LOCATION AS APPROVED BY ME ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOWLNE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS 6. LONGITUDINAL SLOPES OF WALKS SHALL BE 5S (MAX.) AND 11 (MIN.) AND 20 (MAX) CROSS SLOPE EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE DRAW1NG5. 7. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLE55 INDICATED OTHERWISE MI THE DRAWINGS SLOPES GREATER THAN 51 SHALL REOUIRE SURFACE ROUGHENING BY EITHER "5TAIR5TEP' GRADING, GROOVING. FU8806496, OR TRACKING TO AVOID RUNOFF VELOCITY AND RECEIVE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. SLOPES LESS THAN 3:1 NOT 5TABILZED MATH VEGETATION SHALL HAVE THE SURFACE ROUGH GRADED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY UNTIL 50D HAS BECOME STABILE AND MATURE. AT NO TIME THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT, SHALL SLOPES BE A 0900TH GRADE OR A COMPACTED SURFACE FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0R161If IDcs,eWdtloo war AIE etc mov& isonme oveWeW ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD II= wuaw.ww I MN1 894 tIM tlu POn smacAM. Tot em 09454 4 414 war 114 F¢I 8904/88/ Val I nn0day 18841 lubmm As6ik. inter W Ian a1 W dole al lame . Poe 5441 1. Sons Dam b. NON CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS —LL, LLC IANF DNMOa E 9N- TW1200N 952 - 7.1201 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 08/19/85 CRY SUBN0AL 09/27/05 REY PEA CITY REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C3.0 90 -803.7 720.903.75 1E(SE)P899.20 ).89 IE(W)- 2. 9 9. 1E(SW)P891.99 IE(NE).891.39 7Y -6" PVC 0 1.049 RD -112 RE■905.00 7223; 10.600.00 1/4 R, b Pepe . 0@W� 915$ 9 223 25 8fry0 0400 aR� 82 236' -3r RCP 0 0.155 CBMH -102 720.901.77 IE(5).897.77 IE(SW)- 691.04 1E(NE)■690.44 RD -113 RE- 905.00 IE■898.51 1' -8" PVC 0 1.04% -s d' 15 0 30 3151' -40" RCP 41 0.10: 5164 -101 60.900.0 I0 =890.05 54' -42" RCP @ 0.10% FE5 -100 I9- 990.00 126' -24" RCP 0 0.259 126' -24" RCP 0 1.912 HYDRANT 8/08 GROUND EL -905.6 8 "X6" REDUCER 2- 6" -45' BENDS 5TMH -104 RE -905.6 IE■B94.46 8" GATE VALVE 8" TEE CONNECT TO TERMAIN, • B MOTHERS 88-2 RE■904.90 I0■893.42 7 035 aE`5�5 , 649g\yy9 \ ohN• • 5� so- -CA 123' -16" RCP 0 4.805 0889 -108 RE.905.30 10(5)-896.69 IE(N)- 698.29 8- -22.5" BEND 8 "- 11.25" BEND MN -1 RE-904.50 19.892.97 5TMH -105 RE -906.0 I0- 894.77 34' -24" RCP 0 0.202 0946 -106 991904.66 lE(SW)■895.64 / IE( 895.44 ^� IE(NE)•894.84 • / • RD-114 RE +908.0 I9- 905.06 EXTEND 6" PVC STUB 73' -12" RCP @ 6.055 140' 715" RCP 0 3.975 CBMH -107 RE -905.52 IE- 901.52 1 fPVC 0 1.045 102' -8" PVC @ 1.509 5TMH -109 RE.1606.75 IE(S,SE).901.47 IE(NW).901.00 78' -8" PVC 0 1.969 EXTEND 6" DIP STUB CONNECT TO EX1511149 STUB (FIELD VERIFY 000ATI0N) CONNECT TO EXI5TNC STUB IE =893.61 (FIELD VERIFY) " DIP STUB 19/06 (BY OTHERS) " PVC STUB (BY OTHERS) 15 0 30 nl_n p0 2005 Paar �-- UTILITY NOTES: --$-- 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC 406106E5 PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 2. ALL EXISTING UTILITY 10060ON5 SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651- 454 -0002 OR 80D -252 -1166) FOR U00TY LOCATIONS, 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD 958060ATONS FOR WATER MAIN AND 5ERWCE UNE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM 5EWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS 45500ATON 04 MINNESOTA, AND SHALL CONFORM 6194 CITY REQUIREMENTS. 4. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR CURRENT HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 5. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE 00000E IRON PIPE (DIP) CLASS 52 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PO.YVWYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) 50P 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONRETE PIPE (RCP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. E. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURES. 9. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES M PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SN041N ON THIS PLAN D0 NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 10. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11. TYPICAL HYDRANT CONSISTS OF: HYDRANT. GATE 60,11,E, 2.5' OF 6" DTP WATERMAIN AND ANY HYDRANT EX1EN909. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL 12. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER 15 REQUIRED OVER ALL WAIERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN 15 INCIDENTAL 13. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION I5 REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SERVICE 00990 DON5 AND SIZES WITHIN THE BUILDING WITH TIE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 15. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF NEW 01LITIE5. IRRIGATION SYSTEM, AND UN084011 IN5 14TH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A5 -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT 11105E PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 4-- STRUCTURE SCHEDULE -0)- 5117114111RP EIZE CASTING` 4TH -1 48" DA. R -1642 1.16 -2 48" DIA. R -1642 8184 -101 66" 01A. R -1642 CBMH -102 66" DIA. R- 3067 -8 C8MH -103 56" DIA R- 3067 -V 518094-104 46" 018. 6 -1842 ST/01-105 48" DIA. R -1642 C91,01- 100 48" DIA. R- 3067 -6 013415 -107 48" DIA. R- 3067 -V 0894 -108 48" DA. 6- 3061 -V 51118 -109 48" DIA R -1642 • NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION @ 02,010f1- 2905, 4 MIW W 64014, NE, me M06eCI980II0093AMnxops ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD P 1 WM e*99 695 W pm, 0x8 061 m Pwxed b^+P10x 0// 6690n 0d RI 148oAdl Lased PMm.m EnOner M0x IM Ws N W slee4 of Woneadn Axes LL Ammo 00_ Dame m. 42723 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 1%S>tsmFE We E, NN. Ps2- 741700 952.704201 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 08/15/05 CRY 5098014 09/27/95 REV PER CITY G REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: UTILITY PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.0 • • • NOTE: COVER FITTINGS WITH PLASTIC WNLIL)_PRIOR TO POURING UNDISTURBED 010W:1100 6. UNDISTURBED SOIL PLAN 2500 P51 CONCRETE 28 DAY STRENGTH SECTION CONCRETE REACTION BACKING FOR BENDS DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 45 mlmumP nos, wm0ORDwow AE.INCAm*TLErsawar ensw0lEAs PLAN UNDISTURBED SOIL PLAN CONCRETE REACTION BACKING FOR TEES DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SECTION NOTE: POOLYETHYLENES(4MIL) PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE. 2500 P,5.1. CONCRETE 25 DAY STRENGTH RINGS (3 MAX.. 1' MAX OF RINGS & MORTAR). 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIDE. BETWEEN RINGS. CASTING & AND MANHOLE. FINISH SMOOTH ON THE INSIDE. NO MORTAR ON INSIDE. MANHOLE SLEEVE SEE DETAIL PLAN 04. 4P' SECTION A -A MI STAINLESS STEEL . STRAP FLEX BLE SLEEVE MANHOLE SLEEVE NO WOOD SHALL BE USED FOR ADJUSTMC CASTNG: CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST IRON MAr0IOLE FRWE B CABER AS PER SPECIDCAIIM. . ASTM C458. STEP LOCATION SHALL BE AS NETTED W THE 5P ECIF. PONS. L. PER MANHOLES AND ONES TO BE CONSTRUCTED WIMWL STEPS, PRECAST F2WF0RCE0 CONCRETE WAWOIE SECTIONS PER AVM 0478. FUW0SHED MTH RING GSRETS AND LUBRI.NT 51041 00 8 AS 0 UNDER SPECIEEO. A 1Z OR 1E BARREL SELTON SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER THE CONE RHEAS. POSVOLE. MADE WATER TDHT BY CAST INPLAC PIPE RUBBER 0002 CTI 0 AND CEMENT MANHOLE ORTAR 2Bi 0 SURFACE SHALL 51 115HE0 0400015. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE WATERMAN SIZE VARIES TEE COVER AS SPECIFIED CURB GATE VALVE 800 GATE VALVE 1 1/Y WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND. 0215.1/3 C.T. (NIN. 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS 50115) 8'%8"X16" CONC. BLOCK GATE VALVE DETAIL 3 NOT TO SCALE RIN00 (3 MIN., 1.0' MAX. OF RINDS k MORTAR). 1/T MORTAR ON OUTSIDE. BETWEEN RINGS. CASTING & MANHOLE. FINISH SMOOTH ON THE INSIDE NO MORTAR ON INSIDE, PRECAST COVER SLAB (TYPE 2) 2 STRIPS BTTUMASITC SEAL ON SLAB JOINTS. NO CEMENT. TIE 8005 MNDOT 3733 TYPE 3 GEOTEXRLE FABRIC MIN. 1 LAYER ATTACH TO TOP OF BONNET \"IN1- SHIELD' SEAL oou01. NO WARD SHALL BE USED SON ADJUSTING CASTING; CEMENT MORTAR ONLY. CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME E 0040 AS PER SPECIFlGTWNS. MANHOLE PER 401MC470. LOCATION 50141 BE 00 001FD N TIDE E5ECIFICATION05 PµSDG PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS M BASE SLAB PER 0581 0070. FURNISH PRECAST MANHOLE 0005085 0210 0 -5240 GASKETS & LUBRICANT EXCEPT AS OTHEINVISE SPECRRO. A IT OR vCSSBBRIEL SWOON SHALL BE INSTAL/a UNDER TIE CONE FILL OPENMG BETWEEN PIPE M NH WALL WRIT DEMENT MORTAR. SIDE SURFACE SHALL BE R.N. SMOOTH. STORM SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PLAN LT*, Rwr Bme. laY p Fm Feu Pinar or ..UO To 30. uw 1.5'. ©7.H<. v°.O.mP°eirsa.:�"ieo IIa m0X A 0410 m to omen. ..11. F `';. e MR. amweor op s flat. 001,.,* 0 .0494 Mot. .047 o 9Pm. TABLE OF 00035715 0000 W OUANa1Es 8210400 AT RCP-A OUTLfl5 w BOXES OF EQUIVALENT 52601 MOTH Luss R a5p6 T4 1" aSNTp' Lro. n a�tZ o Rom a L (FL) Dep. a. ! C �O DMmr W!Yd. P. n :1 Y 1.'a. r Granular Y2. NOP CuP. Jr %. Z Ma W 121d: Ix 2 3J JO I0 06 a a 10 10 12 1 G 20 x3 zp S.B 6x 3.6 TS 0 10.5 yp za z.l ZS 17 .0 05 5.p 63 0., all 1 1Y4 zT a.] B.0 41 9 01 ss re S 11fi 5.S 253 za zP ].0 35 92 0. 1]9 0000 W OUANa1Es 8210400 AT RCP-A OUTLfl5 w BOXES OF EQUIVALENT 52601 MOTH 711970.01101 x414 y. w..yru . ° 59 "*!"" wId a.atPMwd N w Pmw. FLARED END SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3/4 GALVANIZED STEEL. TIE RODS OR "MEGA LUG BRAND THRUST RETNNER GLANDS AT JOINTS SEE STD. DWG. 203 CURB WELD CONDUCTIVITY STUD 2' BELOW FLANGE (FOR 10CAT1014 URP05E5) COVER AS SPECIFIED 0(0108111E FABRIC MN80T 3733 TYPE 3 CONCRETE BLOCK REACTION BACKING 15 08'112 CONCRETE BLOCK WATER HYDRANT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE VANE GRATE SHOWN DIRECTION OF ROW NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED. CASTING AND ADJUSTMENT RINGS AS SPECIFIED. 24 X36 PRECAST DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. - 1- 4 1 1/T WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND MIN. 1/3 C.Y. (MIN. I C.Y. N IMPERVIOUS SOILS.) r GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW /GUTTER GRADE. 10' TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCHBASIN. 5' MAX `3' GROUT SECTION STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE F", E 7, fl.; (s 9005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD gYlp TiN7.,ait•rgl I M^4Y &WSIT U0 We PW. WeeT Pw Pas pa. or under my d(penmen 80 001 I em o ddb 44.8.0 Proletwell Lo wIC LRAM the NW ei we Pow 9 Romeo. BNB_ S Lime ao. MU CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100 SMG 4111! LVB; mei PRaFIE.I. 4EMW .2 -745.12111 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 06/75/05 Litt SUBMRTAL 06 /27/05 REV PER 04TY 4 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: UTILITY DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: C4.1 • • acme' ■STB' d5fZ PWe (h) L (n.) Uv Cre pz. � a. Mi`w a ay. TI u: n R.C.n . a.vi' u ID >6 sl D 1] t n Sp 5.5 a1 0.9 zD 2B 0.0 u s.e B.2 105.81 +as +p .0 .D 1 5.9 6.z 03 ?a.°. i9.3 x5.6 Sa BS Di 2.7 711970.01101 x414 y. w..yru . ° 59 "*!"" wId a.atPMwd N w Pmw. FLARED END SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3/4 GALVANIZED STEEL. TIE RODS OR "MEGA LUG BRAND THRUST RETNNER GLANDS AT JOINTS SEE STD. DWG. 203 CURB WELD CONDUCTIVITY STUD 2' BELOW FLANGE (FOR 10CAT1014 URP05E5) COVER AS SPECIFIED 0(0108111E FABRIC MN80T 3733 TYPE 3 CONCRETE BLOCK REACTION BACKING 15 08'112 CONCRETE BLOCK WATER HYDRANT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE VANE GRATE SHOWN DIRECTION OF ROW NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED. CASTING AND ADJUSTMENT RINGS AS SPECIFIED. 24 X36 PRECAST DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON BOTH THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. - 1- 4 1 1/T WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND MIN. 1/3 C.Y. (MIN. I C.Y. N IMPERVIOUS SOILS.) r GRATE TO BE 2" BELOW /GUTTER GRADE. 10' TRANSITION EACH SIDE OF CATCHBASIN. 5' MAX `3' GROUT SECTION STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE F", E 7, fl.; (s 9005 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD gYlp TiN7.,ait•rgl I M^4Y &WSIT U0 We PW. WeeT Pw Pas pa. or under my d(penmen 80 001 I em o ddb 44.8.0 Proletwell Lo wIC LRAM the NW ei we Pow 9 Romeo. BNB_ S Lime ao. MU CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 12100 SMG 4111! LVB; mei PRaFIE.I. 4EMW .2 -745.12111 PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 06/75/05 Litt SUBMRTAL 06 /27/05 REV PER 04TY 4 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: UTILITY DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: C4.1 • • ID re- lr�l.� tie (O_ Afts • LANDSCAPE MEDIAN - 00000 DRY, MID - STORY, AN0 UNDER STORY PLANTINGS - NUMBERS OF PLANTS IS DICTATED BY 5.0. OF MEDIAN. TYPICAL PARKING LOT ISLAND SECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1ST FL. RETAIL 14,600 S.F. 1ST -4TH FL. RESIDENTIAL (60 UNITS) 1ST FL: 9,300 S.F. 2ND -4TH: 22,300 S.F. PER FLOOR SITE: 115,139 S.F. (2.64 ACRE) :a 1111; A:, -.,t 7- o- a- Zia—Mo`. as 15 0 30 ry FP 2; 7 2005 I1 PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY 114E / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2"X4 XB' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN r WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120 TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 0 —r ABOVE EXISTING GRADE 4 SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR / MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH 2" FROM TRUNK r EXISTING GRADE /3 AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 F R00T BALL. IF COMPBI RIDABLE. REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW 900190LL c LiC 1 THREE TIMES WIDTH OF R00TBALL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1 050 LTHREE TIMES WIDTH OF R001BALL EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE LTHREE TIMES WIDTH OF 800109LL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE • e PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE r14 X8J WOODEN STAKES, SINNED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER, STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120 TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 0 -2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE 3' SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER. KEEP MULCH r FROM TRUNK DIVING GRADE CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL IF NON - BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE - BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOT8ALL PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE) PLANT TOP OF 80018 LL 1 -r ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 4" SHREDDED CYPRESS OR CEDAR MULCH DO NOT BURY STEMS OR TRUNK EXISTING GRADE ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTB9IL LOOSENED TO E NSURE PROPER BACKFILL -T0 -900T CONTACT SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION D O NOT EXCAVATE BELOW FOOTBALL 4)-- LANDSCAPING NOTES: -4,- 1. AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACI1971E5 SHALL RECEIVE 4' MIN. LAYER LOAM AND WASHED 50D AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE 08AMNGS AREAS WITHIN STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL RECEIVE LOAM AND 500 WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. SEE 500 INSTALLATION NOTES BELOW. 2. LOCATIONS OF DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES. LIGH0NG FIXTURES. DOORS AND WINDOWS, AND STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3 TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE BALLED AND BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP. 4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE A" LAYER OF SHREDDED CYPRUS5 OR CEDAR MULCH ON TOP OF A NON- BIODEGRADABLE FILTER FABRIC AND BORDERED WITH 3/16' THICK STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGING. 5. RAINGARDEN AND INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE WETLAND SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED. 6. ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBLET IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4--- SODDING INSTALLATION: — I. THE LOAM AND SOIL SHALL BE 4' LAYER MINIMUM, LOOSENED, AND FREE OF CLODS ROCKS, AND DEBRIS. 2. AREAS TO RECEIVE 50D SHALL BE FERTILIZED WITH 25 POUNDS PER 1000 50.91. (1000 LB /AC) OF 10 -10-10 FERTUZER AND WORKED INTO THE TOPSOIL 3. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DAMPENED PRIOR TO LAYING THE SOD. JOINTS IN THE SOD SHALL BE STAGGERED, AND THE EDGES BUTTED TOGETHER TIGHTLY TO AVOID GAPS BETWEEN 500 LENGTHS. 4. 500 INSTALLED ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER. OR IN AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOWS, SHALL BE STAKED IN PLACE. INSTALL THE SOD PATH 144E LENGTH PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATER FLOW FOR SLOPES WITH SHEET ROW. 5. AFTER INSTALLATION, AREAS SHALL BE TAMPED OR ROLLED TO PROVIDE GOOD CONTACT BETWEEN 500 AND SOIL. AFTER R0LUNS NE 50D SHOULD BE WATERED 50 1981 THE SOIL 15 MOISTENED 4 INCHES BELOW THE 50D. $) SODDING MAINTENANCE: 1. IN THE ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE RAINFALL WATER DURING THE 30 DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING 50D PLACEMENT TO KEEP SOIL MOIST. FOLLOWING THIS INITIAL 30 DAY ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, WATER AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEOUAIE MOISTURE IN THE ROOT ZONE 2. WHERE MOWING 15 DESIRED, MAINTAIN GRASS HEIGHT OF 3 INCHES AND SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED UNTIL THE SOD IS FIRMLY ROOTED, USUALLY TWO TO THREE WEEKS AFTER SOD I5 LAID. 3. INSPECT AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW ANNUALLY AND FOLLOWING INTENSE STORMS MAKE NEEDED REPAIR AND REVEGETATE PROMPTLY. 4— SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS: ---(i I. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE NNDOT 608 AND INSTALLED NO LATER THAN JUNE 10TH. IF PLANTING OCCURS AFTER AUGUST 1519, SEED WITH A NURSE CROP OF RYE NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 5144. IF PLANTING HAS NOT OCCURRED BY OCTOBER 5TH. NEN DORMANT SEED THE SITE NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1ST. PUNTING SCHEDULE OTT. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DECIDUOUS TREES ROOT 520 COMMENTS GREEN MOUNTAIN SUGAR MAPLEACe, SACCHARIN 'Green Mountain' E BNB 2 1/2' CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM - 00098 RRY B&B 2 1/2" CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM - SUNBURST' HONEY LOCUST Gledilsio Triaconthos Var. Inerrnis 'Suncale' B&B 2 1 /2" CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM - PRAIRIE SPIRE ASH - GREENSPIRE LINDEN CND, occIdentall5 Frorinus Pennsoyanico Rutty' Tilie cnmata 'Greensoire' B&B 2 1/2" CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM B&B 2 1/2" CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM CONIFERIOUS TREES RED PINE Pinus ounoens B&B 6' HT. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM - EASTERN RED CEDAR Jun'ryau s vlramrono B&B 6' HT. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM ORNAMENTAL TREES SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE Moles 'Swine Snow' - JAPANESE TREE LILAC Syringe reticulate - PAGODA DOGWOOD - PAPER BIRCH Cones OIlem11oIia Betula oa➢erilera 8 &B 1 1/2' CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM 8&B 1 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM B &8 1 1/2" CAL STRAIGHT LEADER-MULTI-STEM B&B 1 1/2' CAL. STRAIGHT LEADER - MULTI-STEM DECIDUOUS SHRUBS COMPACT P44 RHODODENDRON IVORY HALO DOGWOOD 4ne4odendron 'P.J.M. Compact' - LITTLE PRINCESS 5PIRAEA - COMPACT BURNING BUSH - BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Corms other 'Balihol,' CONT. 36" HT DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0.0. COLT. 36' HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0.C. 5pim a 'tittle Princess CONT. 18" HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0.0. ELsOn us aloft= 'Comooctus' CONT. 36' HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' O.L. - JAPANESE 5PIREA 008080RIOUS SHRUBS 5oimeo japonica 'Neon Flash' CONT. 24" HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4' 0C. CONT, 24" HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE TECNNY ARBORINTAE MUGHO SLOYAAOUND Tnula ocUdentolis 'Technv' Pima mug, 'Sluwmound' CONT. 6' HT DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 5' O.C. GOLDEN ARBORINTAE - DWARF BLUE GLOBE SPRUCE Thus, occidentelis cures Picea ourwen0 'Glo5as0 COLT. 36" HT. DENSE BRANCH -5PAOE 3' 0.C. CONY. 30' HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 3' 0.0. CONT. 36" HT. DENSE BRANCH -SPACE 4 D.C. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER I le'AI ratty eel 60 p4,. n.dbn:bm or net 606 Peered R Tr P roan eR ave 4o,0 andud1 en AM Wes of Of dupe al .o luny bx 000 11.1 L bMer lic.ee X41501 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC SIXGIeT IE WRE FOBeeANWF, NN, 952-716000 90-N611UR PROJECT: LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: C6/15/05 CTIT' SURVIVAL 05/20/05 REV 0E0 CITY G REV. THI5 SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C5 ■0 SHEET NUMBER: A1.0 39' -1" 49' -749` 289'- 11Y7" GARAGE LEVEL BLDG. FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/16 ".1' -0" NOTE: P 440 o0U5i0.EA1ANCE of NOT LESS 104SHALL 1HA� 41000110 ARID *4.40444 BLA4, 111PC, 421 9x4111. OBSTNUCl10N, 414401 FOrt 00LL-OOM10O SMLIES. RAMS. OR 0/91.015. GARAGE GENERAL NOTES 40DPEN51GN9 AA[ 1AREN 10 041542E FACE OF BLOCK NALL. t TO 401.1044 UNL 01 IM. WALLS. 0. kV E ON ED PLANS FOR NALL TYPE D09DNAl1091 NOT 2 REFER TO 51M1CTORAL PLANS FOR L4RL SCHEDULES # ALL OTHER 511201*RAL CO0POIE105 OF 744 BUILO04 0 42 ANY LEMAHU5CRuP# STRUCTURAL S7 100 01RUCTUR.LL OR*MN05 MALL 5UM:RN IF 5601 015CREPAN0E5 OCCUR, C001R06105 90011 440041 144E 11.4091041 114.4E11101E11. MVERPI 104114444 01 PLUOBINO 40 4414410915 x1144 CCNANMAL SHALL 0 INCH. H Art.IN0ES OCCU., C0N1RAC10R 5X/11 901141 110 AR0111ECT IUME01ATEt1. 5. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL 0RCUR SNEAKER PANELS # N0.11AES 0*00 TM ELEC110CA1 0005 if ELEC. 011000PAN055 OCCUR, C09TRAC10R 9114 NO1ET THE ARCHITECT 00L0AT1LT. B. ARP( LOCATION OF METERS NTH 1(09. 4 ELECTRICAL OW05. IF DISCREPANCIES OCCUR 001141 CONTRACTOR IMNEDIA1ELY. ] OCI0f1 LOCATION OF 4410A1MN CONTROLS PATH CANER AND RAMAR01 C0N1HAC10R. COORDINATE 5115 NECK 0051 AND 51441011044 C010AC100. 5. RE1, 0ML AHD LANDSCAPE UVCS FOR 511E INFORMATION R. NOT IN 101,ltO ON 1435 FLAN L FRE CAINDURMRS SHALL HE Ix ,00*0 AND L*11T0Y5 51111 LOCATION SIONAOE AS REWIED B1 CODE AND 011 O up FRE OARSHALL9 OFFlCE O. PROVIDE rMC '11"2.-,;`,1";1"`""."°15 LL M 440110 5411 0550001405. SE 011 11. CARNET THE E1TMO05HER5 10411[0 09 OAU WALLS 94ALL BE SURFACED 110U01E0 (TT.) REF. DETAIL 15 /15.1 12. ALL REOIRED EMIT DOORS 91A1 OPERATE FROM INSIDE 011001/1 ME USE OF A 0E1 CR SPECIAL 1.NONLE00E OR MOT.. 5 EAT LIMING SHALL 940 IN APPROVED Accra.* AS REWIRED BT ELECTRICAL CODE. ERR TO 11151 FOR PANIC 51.11044 LOCATION' COORDINATE NIP LUC. 15 REF. 591. A9.4 FOR SIONACE EXTENT AND LOCATION 16. MARIAN P0,11111 SLOPE 10 ALL FLOOR MANS. HOLD ALL DOERS AT F.F.E.•9D 177M A . PERN1TER FOUNDATION DRAINAIZ 1LE 10 4x1090 1904 CENTER Of 01110444 TO LON P1. AT SUMP PVT LOCATIONS CONNECT 10 SUMP PR. PROVIDE let 0 ARIA WELL CONNECT & CCT TO 0 PERIMETER TILE. 1S. PROIEC1 ALL LOCH # CLEC. COAPNEN1, *01ER5, AND SY51EN5 94114 DOLLMD0. CONTRACTOR 541011. VER01 LOCATIONS. 1.54. GEIAL 15/A9.1 RMCA. To PROWS PROTCC0N 0RO0 5REEZMO rOR AMT TES LOCATED WAINN 20' Or OAR= DOOR. CO. 5x141 AREA WELL LOCATIONS 10 E0 APPROVED 1.1 005144 AND MCA. C041NAC1CR. 21 REF. 5141S A11.1 4 A11.2 FM ROW/ FN15M # DOOR SODOM F, 2005 O U N CT FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 13ROUP A /£INC.I uee1 NYIEF 9144 104 Ron, =IN= l 0(5 I90MNi014 /00110 1911/ OWN" kep*He9 kdillcl MN9 We MA M IM 944 1i la= ONe 1100 M,94M 1Y405*05 0. 1.10 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP InIOSINGLEPOLOR EOM E F4 Mi 194}70100 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHF0 -00020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE IRAR LPIO LIKES, AN. ISSUE: 5/5/2005 A REV. THIS SHEET ENO REV, THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 185' -1}27 UN If 200' -614" 5" 51' -5Y;" 291' -3" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PL AM moat LIMIT R 16111666 0051 LAN .,,j. A3.1 wARa ar 1059 Nn m $ Fir am 2 Furs 15 ""rr or 0 6miNEr 0 ar 0 • 2 15 273.1 193 9® 0 0 0 o 6 2 1S 15 3.1 27 3f 932 1Ri SS $ D p 0 D 0 0 3 125 A32 1270 1150 9 S® Alp • 3 125 Ail 1 Iles 1 1 236 1.199 6 3 115 Ail 1220 1,170 0 0 0 3 125 A32 1255 1.115 0 0 0 J.1.6 3 2 A23 1371 121 D 0 0 A 3 225 A33 1293 1259 1 1293 1,169 Vass 6 GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARETA1021 TO OUTSIDE FACEOF&OCICWA L, OVT%E FAZE OF EXTERIOR WALL, OR TO DENIER UMEOFWNOOWS &NT. WALLS 2. REFER TO !RUNGE° UNIT PLANS SWUNG PNG FLOOR RMS FOR ALL WALL TYPE, 0005 • WINDOWOESGNAT0NSNOTINDICATT ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LESEND,000R, WNDOW,R00M FINISH SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3. VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING LFNi1R ES VIDE LECHMNICAL CONTRACTOR. If MECH. D15C5EPANCIE000LR, COMMACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT 39531234113.11. O. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICALCRCIITEEEAYER PANES& FIXTURES MATH THE ELECTRICAL CON105010. E ELEC. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR E NLLNOIFYTHEARCWOOT IMMEDIATELY. 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR LINTEL SCHEWLEStALLOTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDNG, IFANY 05CREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL ,N£CHMRGL &SRICTURAL DRAWINGS. THE STRUCTURAL DRATANGS EIM. GOJEFH. 1 SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR 9H 1NOTTY THEARCWIECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. REF. CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE OWGSSS STENFORMITI0N NOT INDICATED ON THIS PAPAL 1. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE HCAPSYWIDL ARE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE UNITS. REFER TO ENLARGED PLANS FOR ROOOIONµ INFORMATION t REFERENCES TO ACCESSBLE CRITERIA B. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH MINER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. COORDNATEWTHMECFICAGSAND IRRIGATION COMPACTOR 9. SECURITY CAMERAS TO BE LOCATED BY 005458 40 COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 10 CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURRED CWSSAND EWERS REQUIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL, WCTS,PRNG.FRE SUPPRESSION PIPING, AND E1ECTRICKW7NG.NERIFYLACARONMD SIZE REQUIRED WTH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL COMRACT05S 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPING AT ALL PENET0ATIONSNRATEO 8041 ASSEMBLIES. SEE 5CTON07270. 12. ALL EIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BEN APPROASO LOCATN#S WIN LOCATION 519NAGE AS 00001800 BY CODEFWO CITY OF /COI FIRE MARSHALLS OFFICE 13. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON GYP. 30.W4315 SHALL E Mt REC5 S00. SEE DETAILXXX FIRE EXTAGU6i6510CATEG ON CAW WALLS SHALL BE SURFACED mows DTP) 14. ALL REQUIRED EXIT 000R5 SHALLOPiRATEFROMINSDEWTHOUT THE USE OF AKEY OR SPECIAL/N0*IS0400 EFFORT. 15. EXIT LIGHTING SHALL RE 114 APPRDV® LOCAlpN5A9RE0111RED BY ELECTRICAL CODE ID. EXACT AREAW£11 LOCATIONS TO BEAPROVED BY OANEEAND MECH. CONTRACTOR. 17. REF. ST. XXX FOR SI0509001124T AAO LOCATION I36. REF. BHT. XXX FOR ROOM FINISH&D00R SCHEDULES 15. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES T ALL WTCHEN AND BATH SNKRFEE 20. PROVIDE METAL STRAP BRAZING *TOMES CORNER SPADING OR FULL VERTICAL 4 X 5 SHEET OF GYPSUM BEADING. 3 31 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4:016667 2004, Manm=aar 93X,6c,maIXC15ax64.3616 66 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD hoary 0Xif3 110 014 PM, as%v911o, es 't6n 600 TIM I ■m a 666 (a9AP4l1PBPI P61116 166 0119 5544 M 15 P0o 045_ (81W 527 10462 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP IMO6665RElAli 5E1RWN5MN 1$1)]35.140 FAX 11521,46.111 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VW.AGE TRAIL 15'40 LASS, MN. ISSUE 5/5/2005 P REV, THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Al c1 291' -3" SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCAL119 15 °c1,0° MAR ANT T® nta 1! !LM Q. sNo A3.7 RWi v 1OL kr 537 9B DND LLV6. 2 ,A 15 . 17Gl1 0ROatl5! v 1511 m 959 B 'l 75 53.1 i055 930 1 168 99D A 2 2 15 5 Ail 551 993 1528 525 1 956 1 990 ® 523 556 L 3 1.15 532 1370 1,190 B 10010 9® 3 1.75 232 1* 2,199 2 2572 297 a 3 1.75 932 1250 1 .170 1 140 1,170 N 3 1.75 A32 1255 1.175 1 12fb 1,175 AANRP 3 2 133 1371 127/ 1977 1277 3 1 225 I 933 12B 1.18 1 109 1,JB TOTAL iB 22DES DD. GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TNEN TO OUTSIDE FDCEOFE OCNWALL,0U19DE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL, OR TO CENTER LINE OFNND0W5 &NT WALL 2. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANSLEJLDNONURG FLOOR.. FOR ALL WALL TYPE, DOOR L WINDOWDE0GNAi1ONS NOT 901097ED ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGBRO,DOON, WMDOW,R00MFN191 SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 3. VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING L FIXTURESNTMNECNNIOSL CONTRACTOR. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SH4L NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT 344ED1408.11 A. VERIFY LOCATION Of ELECTRICALCWCUTETFJY. PANFJSL FIXTURES WITH THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IFELE-C. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, COMPACTOR WALL NOTIFYTIE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR LNTELSCNEDULESL4L OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. R ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE MCHLFECTURAL,5ECNWICI1&STRUCTURAL ORAWIN05, THE STRUCTURAL PRAVANGSSILLG018RN. 1F91GM DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SH20LNOTBY THEARCNI59T IMMEDIA1E1. 5. REF. CIVIL AND LANDSCAPEOWGS FOR sue INFORMATION NO7 INDICATED ONR95PLW. 7. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE 71090611 IL ARE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE UNITS. REFER TO ENLARGED 9NR5F0RS00DONAL INFORMATION L REFERENCES TO ACCESSIBLE CRRESA B. VERITY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 000RUNATEYRIH 1ECH DNGSMO IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 9 SECURITY CAMERAS TO BE LOCAT ®BY OWNER AND COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 10. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURREDCHA0*5M0 SOFTRB REQUIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL, MOTS, PaWG.FRE SUPPRESSION PIPING. AND ELECTRICAL WIRING VERIFY LOCATION MM 512E REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICALCOHIRACT0R5 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPING AT ALL PENETRATIONS NPRIM WALL ASSEMBLIES. SEE 6E0110007270. 12. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL SE M.P.H9LOCATI5NS WTH LOCATION 510NAGE AS RE0UIR9 BY CODEAN0 CITY OF ZEN FIRE MARSHALL90FFICE 12 FRE EfTINDVISHERE LOCATED ON OM BD. WALLS SHALL BEE. RECESSED • SEE DETAIL XXX FIRE EXTINGUEHERSLOCATED ON CMJ WALLS SHALL BE SURFACED WONTED (YP.) 14. ALL REQUIRED EXIT 00085 SHALL OPERATEFROMN90EMATNOUT THE UBE OF AIEY OR SPECIAL WIOAAEOGEOR trruNT. 15 EDT LIGHRNG SHALL BE IN APPROTED LOCATIO16AS REQUIRED SY ELECTRICAL CODE 1E. EXACT AREA WELL LOCATIONS TO EE*PRO EO9Y ONNBR AND MECH. CONTRACTOR 17. REF. SW. XXX FOR SIGNAGE EXTENT AND LOCATION 70. REF.5NT. XXX FOR ROOM F9A91LDOOR SCHEDULES 15. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL MICHBRAN064N 55095995 2.1 PROVIDE METAL STRAP BRACING AT OUTSIDE CORNER OF BALDING OR FULL VERTICAL A X 5 SHEET OFOYP0M5HFATHING. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION x591,HNRIFP° 210.W N4UX.AI0171C19ax0■54na®s ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 'GROUP A/EEVC.I I kirk o 0ly Xv2 Art pea, IATa20122 2591 we 9.2 0 Cam sumNi50 on0 1411 om a 047 ,M �Snw 00095 inn 702 IC. N 50 M enema. Wa NN5 terra. NA 70002 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 09 090PIREEL1BS litei RAMIE" 5992}715129 fAC1952)9.155 PROTECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHPA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TARO LINO LAKES, NET ISSUE: 1/0 /0005 REV, THIS SHEET ONO REV, THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Al 02 16 200' —sy," 39' -3" 291' -3" ' ID LEVEL FLOC PLA GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ME TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF$OCI0WAL0UT90E FACE OFENTERIOR WALL, OR TO CENTER LINE OF vAloows NINt. WALLS 2. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS SEVERING WING FLOOR PLANS 106 ALL WALL TYPE, 0008 E WTNDON061GNARION5NOTROICATB3 ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND,DOOR,WNDOW,R0014FN91 SCHEDULES FOR ADDRIONALNFORMATON 3. VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING I. F0.TURESMI7H MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIE90CCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOWT THE ARCHITECTRAEDMTE.Y. A. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CWCUR BREWER prW35& FIXTURES will THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. FEEL. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOWT THE ARCHITECT IMNEBIATELY. 6. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR UNTIE. SCHEDULES SALL OT$V STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE SUILDNG. IFARY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHRECTURAL,AECIVMCA.&STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SW.LGOVERN. IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SMALLNOIIFYTIE ARCHITECT MMEDWTBY. 6. REF CARL AND LANDSCAPE OWLS FOR BMENRORMNTON NOT INDICTED ONTHIS RAN. 7. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE HON+ SMEOL AREIINIDICAP ACCESSIBLE 05ITS. REFER TO ENLARGED RANSFO8A00RM , INFORMATION &REFERENCES TO ACCE65ELE CRR6RLi 6. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND IRRIGATION COMPACTOR. COORDINATE WIN NECH OWGSAO IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 3 . 5 0 0 7 7 0 0 3 10 0 4 0 9 ! LOCATED FN OWNS AND C00601NATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ID. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE All FURRED CHASEAMD SOFFITS REQUIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL. DUCTS, PIRNG, FIRE SUPPRESSOR PIPING, AND ELECTRICAL WIRING. VTR01 LOCATOR ARO SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPING AT ALL FBIEIRATIONSIN RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. SEE SECTIONOT270. 12. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOWIONSWITH LOCATOR 0GNAGE AS REQUIRED ET C00EAND CITY OFXXX FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE 13. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON GYP. ED. WA1591ALL EESBA RECPNPEU • SS DETAIL XXX FIRE EN'IPIGU9IE01004160 ON CIA/ WALLS SHALL BE SURFACED MOUNTED (T118) 14. Al REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL OPBRAIEFROMN00E Wi7HOUT THE USE OF A NET OR SPECIAL131008 DOE OR EFFORT. 16. BUT LIGHTING SHALL SE IN APPROVED LOCATIONSA5RE000ED BY ELECTRICAL CODE 16. EXACT AREA WELL LOCATIONS TO BE/APROVED ET OWNER AND NECK CONTRACTOR 17. REF. SIN. XX% FOR 0ONAGEB.TBITAN LOCATION IE. REF. 6HT. XXX FOR ROOM FNB16000R 6CHEDIRS 19. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL 1TCHE4AND BATH 5413 FOE 20. PROVIDE METAL STRAP BRACING AT OUTSIDE CORNER OF BUILDING OR FULL VERTICAL A X B SHEET OF 0I9SUMSIEATHING. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ® L1 W Mem 1m,. mama) 111 NL.1K..0MNA673 N0e.o. 9G ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 'GROUP ATE INC,' MNq Orly tlM Na pm, 56015. Few eaa Pmm.a IY me P u ep IM apmtim aM WA l am a ON 5 lino k a 10 N,»M Mr Nea9MR9. 0306 N Matt 6- *OM No. 1004 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 1210161NGfl60 WE EDEN MAME, RN 1 237431E FAI (9E2106129 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TPIA LW0VI0:6, MN. ISSUE: B/5 /2000 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE'. THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A103 AMR .3M 06M® /LOON imm YAZ m Y my% MSF. RM l',.... 60 MR 1611 00 X11 :!..1.:r 1 @n 959 A 2 15 03.1 1024 359 2 2 15 15 All A31 7* 993 990 928 1 1058 993 EC 913 ID 2 15 Ail 1026 555 1 1028 966 E 3 176 A32 1270 1,190 6 10,192 9520 3 176 212 12E6 1,199 2 292 2392 D 3 175 A32 1250 1370 1291 1.170 M JJIDAP 3 3 175 2 A32 733 1255 1377 1,17E 1277 i 1293 1377 1175 1277 3 225 933 1293 11,189 1 1293 13591 TEFL 18 3000 20662 GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ME TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF$OCI0WAL0UT90E FACE OFENTERIOR WALL, OR TO CENTER LINE OF vAloows NINt. WALLS 2. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS SEVERING WING FLOOR PLANS 106 ALL WALL TYPE, 0008 E WTNDON061GNARION5NOTROICATB3 ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND,DOOR,WNDOW,R0014FN91 SCHEDULES FOR ADDRIONALNFORMATON 3. VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING I. F0.TURESMI7H MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIE90CCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOWT THE ARCHITECTRAEDMTE.Y. A. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CWCUR BREWER prW35& FIXTURES will THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. FEEL. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOWT THE ARCHITECT IMNEBIATELY. 6. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR UNTIE. SCHEDULES SALL OT$V STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE SUILDNG. IFARY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHRECTURAL,AECIVMCA.&STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SW.LGOVERN. IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SMALLNOIIFYTIE ARCHITECT MMEDWTBY. 6. REF CARL AND LANDSCAPE OWLS FOR BMENRORMNTON NOT INDICTED ONTHIS RAN. 7. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE HON+ SMEOL AREIINIDICAP ACCESSIBLE 05ITS. REFER TO ENLARGED RANSFO8A00RM , INFORMATION &REFERENCES TO ACCE65ELE CRR6RLi 6. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND IRRIGATION COMPACTOR. COORDINATE WIN NECH OWGSAO IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 3 . 5 0 0 7 7 0 0 3 10 0 4 0 9 ! LOCATED FN OWNS AND C00601NATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ID. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE All FURRED CHASEAMD SOFFITS REQUIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL. DUCTS, PIRNG, FIRE SUPPRESSOR PIPING, AND ELECTRICAL WIRING. VTR01 LOCATOR ARO SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPING AT ALL FBIEIRATIONSIN RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. SEE SECTIONOT270. 12. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOWIONSWITH LOCATOR 0GNAGE AS REQUIRED ET C00EAND CITY OFXXX FIRE MARSHALL'S OFFICE 13. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON GYP. ED. WA1591ALL EESBA RECPNPEU • SS DETAIL XXX FIRE EN'IPIGU9IE01004160 ON CIA/ WALLS SHALL BE SURFACED MOUNTED (T118) 14. Al REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL OPBRAIEFROMN00E Wi7HOUT THE USE OF A NET OR SPECIAL131008 DOE OR EFFORT. 16. BUT LIGHTING SHALL SE IN APPROVED LOCATIONSA5RE000ED BY ELECTRICAL CODE 16. EXACT AREA WELL LOCATIONS TO BE/APROVED ET OWNER AND NECK CONTRACTOR 17. REF. SIN. XX% FOR 0ONAGEB.TBITAN LOCATION IE. REF. 6HT. XXX FOR ROOM FNB16000R 6CHEDIRS 19. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL 1TCHE4AND BATH 5413 FOE 20. PROVIDE METAL STRAP BRACING AT OUTSIDE CORNER OF BUILDING OR FULL VERTICAL A X B SHEET OF 0I9SUMSIEATHING. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ® L1 W Mem 1m,. mama) 111 NL.1K..0MNA673 N0e.o. 9G ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 'GROUP ATE INC,' MNq Orly tlM Na pm, 56015. Few eaa Pmm.a IY me P u ep IM apmtim aM WA l am a ON 5 lino k a 10 N,»M Mr Nea9MR9. 0306 N Matt 6- *OM No. 1004 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 1210161NGfl60 WE EDEN MAME, RN 1 237431E FAI (9E2106129 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TPIA LW0VI0:6, MN. ISSUE: B/5 /2000 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE'. THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A103 CORR 23017 82 —d" 51' -5)1," 291' -3" FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 'CALL I/4,1'4' LE YAM WM Tel! MASS= FLOOR Fur S. F NTN lm BMX OM AI R' C>a W 2 15 37.1 1023 259 1 1 021 999 l 2 15 A3_1 1090 990 1 1258 990 C 2 15 A3.1 993 929 1 953 926 O 2 15 A3.1 1025 966 ILO 96 R 3 125 A32 1370 1,190 B 10,190 9991 F 175 392 12M 1199 2 2572 2338 3 1.75 A32 1250 7.170 1 1291 1.170 R 3 175 A32 1 Z' 5 1375 1 1255 1.175 241CM 3 2 533 13373 1227 1 1377 1277 _ 225 A33 1 126 1193 1299 1,199 T0956. 19 22006 20562 GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE THEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF ELOCK WN.L,OUIHDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL, OR TO CENTER UNEOFN1$00N5&GM WALLS 2. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS92U1.012G VANG FLOOR PANS FOR ALL WALL-N.9,0008 F WINDOWDE91GN4TION5 NOT ISOLATED ON THIS PIAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEG ENO, 000R, W4200A90014 FlNISH SCHEDULES FOR ADDTION, INFORMATION, 3. VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING 2 WOURESlM1H DEMONIC,'. CONTRACTOR. IF MECH. OISCSEPAICIESOCCUR, CONTRACTOR 9XAL1 NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AWEDIATB.Y. 4 VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CROUP INEN5R PAI53.52 FMTURES 01TH THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, IF EEC. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR 9X099 NORFYTFEARCH1ECT IMMEDIATELY 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR UN165CHE NAE5LALI MPS STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. !PANT OISCREPANCIE OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCH7IECTURAL ,NECNN&C8LLSIRUCTURA ORAVANGS,THE STRUCTURAL ORAMNRGS94RLGOSER N IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR 95NLNORFYREAFCHTECT 1MMEDIA251. E. REF. CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE OW5S FOR EITEWFORM'TION NOT INDICATED ON THISFVN. 7. ROOMS DESIGNATED WITH THE HCAPSYMSDL AREIUN0ICAP ACCESSIBLE 09110 REFER TO ENLARGE, PLANS FOR ADOII30N#L INFORMATION L REFERENCES TO AP-EMLE 0578590 B. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLSWftH OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. 0008071410V41145,8007035950= IRR I5ATI0N CONTRACTOR. 9.5ECUR11 CANER 2 TORE LOCATED ES 022E3 AND COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 10, CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURRED C11ASESS40 GOFFR6 REQUIRE0 TO CONCEAL MECHAYCAL,WCTS,PIPND.FIRE SUPPRES9UNPIPING,ANO ELECTRIC2AMRING. V0OFYLOCARON ASO SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 11. PROVIDE FIRE STOPPING AT ALL P0&TRA7ONSIN RACE/ WALL 3585002155. 855E0110207270. 12. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS TM 20CAT1071 SIONAGE AS REQUIRED BY CODEAID OTT OFXXX PRE MARSHALLSOFRCE 13. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATED ON G103 90. WNJ59XALL E SSA RECESSED- SEE OETAL XXx FIRE EX1MGUEi4ERS LOCATED ON CM/ WALLS SHALL SE SURFACEOMLNT50RYPJ 13. ALL REQUIRED EMT 00089 SHALL OPBRA7E7ROMIN7DEVITHOUT THE USE CF A I0Y OR SPECIAL 109:6142122E OR EFFORT. 15. EDT LIGHTING SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCA3102E SREOIAREDSY ELECTRICAL CODE 12 EXALT AREA WELL LDCATI0NST65EAPFROLED8Y OWNER AND MECH. CONTRACTOR 17, REF. SST. 10W FOR 516NAGEEXTENTA DLOCATION 18. REF. ENT. XXX FOR ROOM FNSH&DOOR SCHEDULES 19 PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL Id7CHENANO BATH 9NKPPES. 20. PROVIDE METAL STRAP BRACING ATOU190E CORNER OF BUILDING OR FULL VERTICAL 3 X B SSEET OP DITSUNIEHEA1MNG. FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD /GROIN A r_• ua�,1 w'.1R9a�m PPN1NAN PAN. t3 r read+ rat tliecl wpmivan and 1311 I no •b erect Meant Leder the M A the lute N NNN1a1a. Ne XulNd M Yi 5 9LXdAO9Ni N4 ILE92 7 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 3912052a9 148E E024RXA1912 MR (M1.761= FAX 1,1=4 1= L) W1mM1498l, WA 1F Un8XNFNX ,0.r_N8aTFC1e5YR®e,N2Ame PROTECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE T VILLAGE MAL LN0 LAIE5,NN. ISSUE: B /5/0005 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Al A PLANNER HARTFORD wP.yA.A,.=' 5 mxy ally 051 110 NY,, 1m NFW1 .o. PFwea 45 ar a II 4001 WIVw6M Ma YM 1 411 o pry M�RI 4141 WI,H the Pate WF 0*044 U. Pratt 4V414.s Nn 1OE1 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER 12 EI ROOF LEVEL BLDG. FLOOR PLAN kir 7 U SCALE:1 /IS° -1' -0' GENERAL NOTES *11000 1ACE O (01ERIOR WALL. ON 10 CENTER Lilt WALL, MNDOIM3 Y WT. WALLS. 2. 4NS FOR WALLL INPWE1 5 MNUORM OE94N1l0L100, 50, 04DICATED ON INES PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND. 0008, WNOOY.'. ROOM 11045,1 SCHEDULES roe ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1 AERR1 LOCATION O PLLWBINO Y FIXTURES MTN MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. IF ARCH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SOUL NO WA THE ARCMECI IYM[OATEL I. 4. VERIFY LOCATION CT MICRO. CROAT BREAKER PANELS Y F1AIURES 44111 100E ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. IF ELEC. ARCA1C Y40*2UR1 CONTRACTOR BULL NOW THE 0 REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS f0R LINTEL SCHEDULES 44 ALL OMMER 51RUCTLRIAL COMPONENTS Of THE WRONG. G. If ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCNHTECTIRRAL, MECHANICAL 01 STRUCTURAL ERUWN00 THE ST440CIURAL DRAWNOS B1ALL 00305N. 1F SuCN USCIWP000IES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL 00501 1HE 2RCAIECI IMMEDIATELY. 6 REF. Cv4 AND LANDSCN'E DIALS FOR SITE INFORMATION NO1 INOCATEO ON 125 PLAN. 7.. ROOMS 0090,12100 081H THE MCAP 01180. ARE 4ANOCAP CCESSBLC UmTS REFER TO ENLANCE, PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL RIFOI00(4 0 REFERENCES 10 ACCESSIBLE CRNEIRA. 4. RIFY LOCATION ROGATION CONTROLS W11.1 OWNER AND IRRIGATION O ROATION CONTRACTOR. COORDIIIAIE MIN ABCH DWi,S AND !RACOON CONTRACTOR. P. SOCIIR(11 CAMERAS 10 0E LOCATED BY 01IMR AND CMRDMAIE WIN ELECIRCAL CONTRACTOR 10. CAHPENIER T 044010E ALL FURRED CHASES AND SOOTS REQUIRED TO CONCEAL BROOM. , DUCTS, PP1NG. FIRE SUPPRESSION RPM, AND ELECTRICAL W'R4NO. T0RFY LOCATION AND 020 00004[0 wan 44ECNANICAL 0844 0100154121 CONIRACTDRS. 11. 04400000 RRE 51CPPmC AT ALL PMETRA110NS IN RATED WALL A50115L1E5. 0*E SECTION 0]220. ALL FIRE ERTINGMSHERS SHALL BC M APWi0TE0 LOCATIONS MTN LOCATION BONAOE AS REQUIRED BY CODE AND 011 OF AO FIRE MNISRALL'S CT10E C 50440 RECESSED - 500 DIEM IL O 05* 4844 EAIINDUS94R4 LOCATED ON GNU WALLS SHALL BE 5RO'ACED 440ANTED (140.) 14. ALL RECIIPEO ENl 000415 SHALL OPERATE 10044 MME W1111O127 1,1E USE O A NEI OR SPECIAL NNOWLEEAX OR EFFORT. 41' E01 10050 SHALL BEM APPROVED LOCATIONS A5 NEWRHEO YY ELECRCA. 0IOE. IS. EXAM AREA WELL L0CA1(0N5 10 RE APPROVED BY LIMI0ER AND 44ECN. CONTRACTOR. 17. REF. 01T. 400 FOR 1100AOE EAIEN1 AND LOCATION is REF. 541. RAM FOR 80044 FINISH Y 0008 SCHEDULES 114. PLACE E5CU10,1EON RATES AT AL1 NTC,1EN AND NM .,L PPES 2O. 4501104 YCTU STRAP BRACING AT MODE CORNER Of BUILDING OR FULL DERTCAL 4 R B OREE1 00 OYPSUY 04 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 12105R18ETREELME E( FAROE AN N521T6 FAA (402)4613¢ PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: ATHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO LAKES, MI ISSUE: 0/0/2000 L REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ROOF LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER: Ai e5 0 0000312044, NWMFm0 CROP, MR, IME.A4MNEC4WENu9EMPLO EES ROBE HOOK TOWEL RACK FULL WIDTH MIRROR TP. OS. FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. ROBE HOOK TP. CIS. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK ROBE HOOK SHOWER ROO FULL WIDTH MIRROR WI MED. CAB. TOWEL RACK T.P. CIS. >s_ FAIII INIWA 1M ZTH RA - -a- TI TOWEL RACK ROBE HOOK OWER ROO TOWEL R �' ,�iliT 5'-:' 5• 3'- t _ , -. ;' , _ • 2' - 1.: • - ` ,>♦ 1 / MECH. ILL MTLRN NO HALFW AWAYPROTREDO 2X9 Awnv HTioM BIDG. 'It i � � %�Wz „I�i BEDROOMt gP1 il'a -'a 1 BEDROOMS IVL WI W1 � CPT! L' � WA 1. _ 'ice_, BEDRInOA - _ MECH ' ^O tt- 1 Rra -. t 9 -• -1 Ova ,` DINING i�! 'sue._ ,,- , d !. L1 • SURROIUND VSO/ -P-D H RY SOFFIT REF MIC� GREAT ROOM I', y Li, DINING 0, L® WDTRIMBEAP: 9 /G,,,P.',vCT KTCHN I Maffellir � w. C � V M C KTCHN irA MICA T -B" 2'- "11. 1 ex • CL2 e 1 T -t y e-r 1 -0)" 3B' -10}F 1S' -BP 1024 GROSS SF 959 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4'-.1'F 25 -0" 5'-:' 5• 3'- t _ , -. ;' , _ • 2' - 1.: • - - • ,>♦ 1 / MECH. ILL MTLRN NO HALFW AWAYPROTREDO 2X9 Awnv HTioM BIDG. . gP1 il'a -'a 1 BEDROOMS BEDROI. 2 WI W1 ' 47 _ 'ice_, BEDRInOA - _ MECH ' ^O 1 Rra -. tCI(VI /_ -• -1 --j-- I ' BEDRa'OMPT MECH -P-D H =I GREAT ROOM I', y Li, DINING 0, L® WDTRIMBEAP: 9 ' IrM2 I _ U.____.1! _GREATROOMT,`,I =1 1; � w. C � V M C KTCHN irA MICA T -B" 2'- "11. 1 ex • CL2 1 1 11 1. ill _; �- _-- PTI =1 I I I IC' I t ..9D � .I 1i •_i ,j /Q • SURROUND 101 A _ DPTi .`- IN. II!'��1`, lel 40:1:14W . Off\ • .^' - AR! - r R1 �1 / .TRIM BCPP �'WIDC / /©�SURROUNDW TZTe__ # %�. ' rN. I tI 1w KTCHN 11=1 NTRY wmAL, 111 ,UB 1 ENTRY cap' i .. ®i .r mar AL 11■ Iii . 3' -1.' ® ' REF /EX In 993 GROSS SF 928 NET SF 22 PORCH SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN TO ORAGN SCALE: 1/4' -1'-0' ROBE HOOK TOWEL RACK FULL WIDTH MIRROR T.P. CIS. FULLWIDRH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. ROBE HOOK TP. CIS. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK ROBE HOOK SHOWER ROD FULL WIDIHI MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. TOWEL RACK TP. 0IS. -TOWEL RACK TROBE HOOK r- 6140WER ROO •-04- •-11A- 1'- TOWEL RACK FULL WIDTFB•-•)2• MIHHUH 1058 GROSS SF 990 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /4'.1 W _2 1•-214• I i �f MECH. GRILL - MTL RAILING - HALF WALL PRESSURE TREATED 2X SLOPE TO DRAIN AWAY PROM SADO. ,>♦ 1 5 . gP1 il'a -'a 1 BEDROOMS BEDROI. 2 ' 47 _ 'ice_, BEDRInOA - _ MECH ' ^O 1 Rra -. tCI(VI /_ -- — wa hal: r -:I r adte�, I �. �I,_:-� Tramp GREAT ROOM I', y Li, DINING 0, L® WDTRIMBEAP: 9 ' IrM2 SOFFIT loi,ISLAND ` O ' � V M C KTCHN irA MICA T -B" 2'- "11. SWD�' �i. 1058 GROSS SF 990 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /4'.1 W _2 1•-214• I i �f MECH. GRILL - MTL RAILING - HALF WALL PRESSURE TREATED 2X SLOPE TO DRAIN AWAY PROM SADO. 1028 GROSS SF 956 NET SF 22 PORCH SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4' -1'-0' FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER MI I HARTFORD 'C1R0UP ArEINC1 nCm!, teal, M. Ink wn. swam. 1 T enfld H ti a. aX aM aF AS*and Mm h Raiment Arehart akar pe lawn al Me tpb el a... X!28 It Nam RD— Aao.d.n Xv. Loses 7 ® carman, 2m,,14Mw ,. own we IN, MMll.zfSAMa X061.V.-. OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 5.1017AFELME EDEN 10.YmIE M! PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE T Y2LAGE 1R/'L LWOLNES'HN. ISSUE: B /B /2QQ3 p REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A3.1 I( ' . ' _ 'ice_, BEDRInOA - _ MECH EMI 1 Rra -. tCI(VI /_ -- — wa 1 ,. • -�' CL2 I I � GREAT ROOM I', :ms.. IrM2 ��I I -11 ' I �i. PTI —I — %` /Q • SURROUND Mid •� is R/ r SWW� L /� rN. I tI Wd• i�� 1 ENTRY NM II TU .1 i,� s ®i mar AL r KTCHN -I ® ' REF /EX In 1i„,„ k Al 1028 GROSS SF 956 NET SF 22 PORCH SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% TWO BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4' -1'-0' FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER MI I HARTFORD 'C1R0UP ArEINC1 nCm!, teal, M. Ink wn. swam. 1 T enfld H ti a. aX aM aF AS*and Mm h Raiment Arehart akar pe lawn al Me tpb el a... X!28 It Nam RD— Aao.d.n Xv. Loses 7 ® carman, 2m,,14Mw ,. own we IN, MMll.zfSAMa X061.V.-. OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 5.1017AFELME EDEN 10.YmIE M! PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE T Y2LAGE 1R/'L LWOLNES'HN. ISSUE: B /B /2QQ3 p REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A3.1 ROBE HOOK TP. D5. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK SHOWER ROD FULL WIDT5 MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. ROBE HOOK T.P. D5. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACY. SHOWER ROO FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MEd. CAB. E 1270 GROSS SF 1180 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 28 PERCENTAGE= 46.67% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" 25' -0^ 5' -3. 1 • -'74^ 0•_S.2' '4 S' -T 2• -0• 3' -,1' RAISED ACCENT w5 WS PliallliniiiiMO 1• -qr y_._ - a._ _ .K. y_1. •• ,' -15 " • -6`2•- •• /r-s• 1• -1074" MT GRILL BALCONETTE Oil MECH. T MTL \ GRILL BALCONEiTE 1 / / ,/! I! AWAY'FR<DMBLDO. [Ili J W5 aEDRIroMJ = - BEDRrr•r MECH.- STEP OUT Rai 1- GREAT ROOM . - ,. L. '1 BEDROIrM3 1 =. , I, 4 . - • 4 , 1 1 1 MM2 = Ill ` 1L 13 1,os 1 ...�', 1 cu 11 I ^I I 1 , I�1 I pI j .I 0 I ft-1r JL 1 6 G �I� Ir'r�ll c- GREAT SpT . Ir GREAT ROOM '_ In J p', l' 1' L — _ l CL4 1! KM T I;tIIL;__ I-�•..H2 Ill i VCT 1 W/ 1 . . i 11 I �C`_J;0- ''[, Y Be I ® L CL1 rf�faMl _. r==1 i1 -..1 - �OS `'r Q �1 �"."iL7 . ; BAR/ `. I R.0 I •ISLMID/ ' MIC W e . . L :k W I 1k j —.�.1 1121` �. �%; A ROBE HOOK TOWEL FULL WIDTH MIRROR MED. CAB. T.P. CIS. SHOWER RACK VV/ ROD '� 1 _ �I� ENTRY E 1270 GROSS SF 1180 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 28 PERCENTAGE= 46.67% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" 25' -0^ �Ny^S s• -Y / h`-sy' ' S•- r• -94' s• -r L r -s• .' -e• s- 2y2�1• / /r-s• 1• -1074" 5, -111 Y -s• 2,_,414' - MI L ANONb - HALFwA4IL. r- PRFS,IITP TREATED 9C 1 ,C MECH. T MTL \ GRILL BALCONEiTE W / / ,/! I! AWAY'FR<DMBLDO. W6 W5 W5 = - BEDRrr•r Rai L. 1. 1 =. - ; MECH. .--1110 = Ir 11 1. 1 -- L_lI ._� —_. r{ LIBEDROIPM3 I pI j .I 0 BEDR.o 6 q•utM12 �I� Ir'r�ll O CLZ GREAT '`-11 Ir GREAT ROOM '_ In J p', l' 1' L L l CL9 CPT1 CPT1 v .. I 7°1 i 11 \I /CL4. ■ VCT WD TRIM SCAR SOFFIT SURROUND VV/ I ® 4� . , :•� VCT rTRIM BCAP /' SURROUND ROUND W/ soPRT _ — I PT1 Obi CPT-1 VCT �OS `'r Q �1 �"."iL7 . ; BAR/ `. I R.0 I •ISLMID/ ' MIC W e . . L :k W I 1k j 1-411 :_,q�� 1121` �. �%; A .E�.ji ' BATHH1•� '� 1 _ �I� ENTRY \)aI REF D, • . ./�i cu nammi IMIMI s1=- n: ' — I f(=' 1 al'" pl;lS�I �'al�l ._ ECV911�Yi...S'Siil�'. ... ROBE HOOK TOWEL RACK FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. T.P. D5. =-Roo 27• -10 co Trilmin ✓ 27' -10' ROBE HOOK TOWEL FULL WIDTH MIRROR MED CA5. T P. DIS. BHOWERROO RAO< W/ S' -4' u._0. 1250 GROSS SF 1170 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /5 " -1'.5 PE TO DRAIN ROBE HOCK T.P. DS. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK SHOWER ROD FULL WIDTH MIRROR WINED. CAB. ROBE HOOK TP DS. TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK SHOWER ROD FULL WIDTH MIRROR WI MED. CAB. C- - - HALF WA!!L # - I -• AWAYFAwTREAT BIaG® PX SLOPE TO BRAIN III I III If 4• r-� PORCH WD TRIM&CAP SURROUND W/ SOFFIT 2T -1 ROBE HOOK I-TOWEL RACK FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. TP. DS. SHOWER R00 1286 GROSS SF 1188 NET SF 22 PORCH SF TOTAL UNITS= 7 PERCENTAGE = 11.67% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4' -1'-0' x_214• 2r• -qH2' - - ,. � T ]' -,tyi' 1•_py D,_0' 1'' '-1.1 5, -111 Y -s• 2,_,414' '-s 5" 3i ,C MECH. T MTL \ GRILL BALCONEiTE W / / W W6 W5 W5 .�.''� BEDROON�y� STEP bUT I - _ MECH Ir 11 .. c/ CPT 1 -- L_lI ._� —_. r{ LIBEDROIPM3 I r� B BRA• 1 155 11 ' �I� Ir'r�ll I GREAT ROOM r CL2 iPTT \I /CL4. ■ VCT WD TRIM SCAR SOFFIT SURROUND VV/ I ® VCT �OS r �I ISLMIII ' MIC W � 1. � �1 Inirgr" 114 _ 1 �. �%; A BRTk117 I1 '� ENTRY REF DN 1 �.. cu nammi IMIMI s1=- n: ' — I f(=' 1 al'" pl;lS�I �'al�l ._ ECV911�Yi...S'Siil�'. ... ROBE HOOK TOWEL RACK FULL WIDTH MIRROR W/ MED. CAB. T.P. D5. =-Roo 27• -10 1255 GRASS SF 1175 NET SF TOTAL UNITS= 3 PERCENTAGE= 5.00°% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN ARCHITECT(ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 1=M11 , ho W/ lardy N fNe pan fgetlfimYen eyo5 woo Toned w m. or .m. N,y # e Ylmn76 umer 5e lave of ,nt Mk xseq NO: Mahon 111. 1852 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP EIEPORAIRIEJON (03}745.28 r>2 024}].51201 SCALE: FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MH55 -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAIL LINO Lens, NN. O OMIaa rm,,,ennam anw NE, INC. M.Ol,frCISIEM Nrl3o.'.nc, ISSUE 1 /0/2605 L. REV. THIS SHEET ®NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A3.2 RO AD AtI TP CO SH SH AD TO FUL MIRI • . r..., ?._. ._. . ...........00,11111 ragnimum „„,mEc. GRILL in • SALOON 111111"111111."'- ad 01 IRA ASN !imp - r -r-'-'' - - ''-- - \ 14.. .i,.. WS :„ Mill WS WI WS' MECH. •••-.- - - • • 0,-------- ' ' 1: \ . , • cu r ---- 1 .....__- ; 1 GREAT • ST5) G 411 1,1•1M% ROOM 7"---, ROOM2 i I . mr • • 1 1 1 i I I ! r___J /*Sr BEDROOM) ''■:* - 1 cm — ONEL EMAinkA • RAB s RE ER R GRAB L R ECAB W14Pr N A-44+40010:- BATI-11 tr.o VCT ' WA, 1 / ' • S j.;• EN KTF44N ■ R O. oIglIIM A _____. _ - ■ V ,, ■Mai Ell 1.- . TRASH CHUTE 1 irLe ME . RE : PUS Nolliri MIl.dI. bq0,10 100e,t, 0001*41416,„ . , r SW/D , RESIDENCE TRASH/ RECYCLE ill s, , 1 I SINK t1,, " — -1421 - I ... • G v 1 1 m i -1 ,...., .0. 1im5rr;a = .'-'0'2" i.,. Pr 4 2*-2h• GRABBARS ILI AD.ADAAmFpORELDIs NG MAT ... . , ROBE HOD.C, ,,• 15,-, • SHOWER ROD . MED CAB. 1----.' \ 1377 GRO$S SF 1277 NET SF FULL WIDTH MIRROR es.-.4. TrIWFI 1,11, =3 PERCENTAGE = 5.00% THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4...1,0 TP.DS. ADA GRABBARS FULL WIDTH MIRROR WI M. CAB ROBE HOOK 14. 050 TOWEL RACK TOWEL RACK ROBE HOOK SHOWER ROD FULL WIDTH MIRROR VV/ MED. CAB, TOWEL RACK 14. 050, 5. br COB- MECH GILL RAILING HALF W PRESSURE TREATED 2X $LOPE TO DRAI AWAY FROM BLDG 1 CL2 I IMP. WM, ,±11 GREAT ROOM 1, 1289 GROSS SF 1189 NET SF 22 PORCH SF TOTAL UNITS= 4 PERCENTAGE= 6.67% TOWEL RACKWI5B..7 MED CAB, ROBE HOOK limn FULL WI.D0. 61 TH 1/1. 018 T II. S HOWER ROD IOWEL RACK - I lirkM"".118 W5 W5 W THREE BEDROOM APARTMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1PP-180 FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER 17171 HARTFORD KlaUrylMENI 1 mono Inol tio pion, 9401 or marl urn pogo. by no or oar. ono suomiokro rod OW 1 am 5 114 ittoioronO oockirect outer In Iwo of be sloie el Mimosa. Dolor" toklialroo 15. 852 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 1.211135I15GIZIAELYE E505.111515<59 1.94).7•15.13:0 FAX COSS).7.192 it) COMMIT 21:04, WPM. awn en.M.owtouncr5/06.1936Wors PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: 118/10-00/120 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT 1NOODS EDGE VILLAGE UAL LBO tAKES,PN. ISSUE: B/5/2055 L REV, THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET 'TITLE ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A3.3 1nI [I 11.11 11■ ammo1111111 1111' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I J1111 a lA ® 11 _ tl dlllllllisllflll�llllillllllill� : 1 ®® ■I. •• UM El ®® NM A9• WEE • MOM pia ma NI • ■11 111 111111 €IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII MINI 1111 IS 11111111JIIIillllllllll111111. ., 47790. R -. • EN ••ammi • md-w-Mir all 111111111111 illullu1111111 m IN MIS SEE SNE 1/A6.3 FCN Sim. ENLARGED ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 5. 5. SEE SHE 1/A6.1 FOR ENLARGED ELEvA1UN SEE 5M 1/A6.3 FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION H SEC Siff 1/06.2 FOR E0ARQD ELEVA1554 -1 ®. 1111131 11"11171.. 1....11 11L...71, 'hill • '�iiin111 11u1H 1 ��1 I 111� I 11..1,5 ERN 1 11111 uun' 1 1u u 111 SEE SW 1/55.2 FOR ENLARGED ELEVA1531 SOUTH —EAST ELEVATION 11 11 11.5 ILU1171 11120111 1111111 11!1111, 111111 111.1. L SCALE: 1/8".1' -0• SCALE: 1/6'. ' -a NUM_ IMIME 111111llla 11 13111 l:IE 111111119 �111111— EN 1111 11■ IIIIIIIPIIIIIIIIIIICIIICIIIIIII I•■ .,Q u, in •• •■■ 1i;IIIIGIIIUIIIIIIIllllllll - -.�_ �1 - ■, ■,I ■I■ �■ 1111 R■ f■I■I �..�.� •= Ll _ �sm • 1111 1111Q �t ,'��® ag- Illillllllllllllli lllllil; ■ :1111 111111111111111111111MI ,�1= ��IIIIIIII'uii_m���oe � M III 111 n 1111111111111111111111111111 NMI ® ■1 91111111 1111111111111111111 111 E ME HSFE 511 1/011 FOR ENLARGED EWLVA1101J —I 'EE SHE 1/563 FOR Sit ENLARGED 013112105 3 EAST—SOUTH--EAST ELEVATION 5. SEE 511 1/A6.1 FOR 51M. ENLARGED ELEvAlION I 111 1 IMO SCE SIN 1/063 FOR 510. [MARCEL ELEVATOR SCALE: 1/6•.1' -a FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD '. =OII5`= INa�.1 Pot t2:47.01 `"a *n p.w Peg I s DII y m .a0MOM0 Inner Ibe - 11 the and e1 Rm. Al Yam RcgMmiian N0. WSW OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP CEMIGNI 2005,RNLwOO OLIO NE. 0KK.M 02TtCIAENS.17,1/a1t5 I1m5W157ffL1E 133311111E,EMi (5)-7•» FAX 1952}7.1131 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE 7 VILLAGE ma LBNO L11S, NN. ISSUE 1/5 /2000 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: ACLLi1 4 .■ 1111 11. SEE SHF 1/163 FOR SRL ENLARGED ELEVATION NORTH -EAST ELEVATION II 11 SCALE: 1/6'111' -0' 1. a 1 I. 111111111111111111111111111=====.111111111111 —_e SEE SH1 1 /A6:3 FOR AM. ENLARGED ELEVATION 2 WEST ELEVATION •l 11111111111111111111111111111 EM ■■ 1111111111111111111111111111 11 IU •■ 111111111111111111111 ;1111111 °° �� ■1 11� u. SALE: 1/661. -011 .. 1I 111111111111111111111111111111 a T �I _ 1111 11II111IIIIIIlIIIIIII rI1lliill 11 Ili �a . •• m ® rI_ m — 9� 1111 _vIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIOIIIIIII II. 11 11IIIIII111111lllllll'111II1(' Illl►IIIIIUIIIigull .... - . � MEE ENO • SEE SHE 1 /AG.3 FOR AL ENLARGED ELEVATION WEST -NORTH -WEST ELEVATION SEE SHI 1 /AS.1 FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION 1 1 5EE SHE 1 /A6.3 FOR SU. ENLARGED ELEVATION • iii 111 111E1, II. 11111111111111111 11111111® 1111 11•1 1111 III Ii ?11111111V1111ItIll .. .. 1 •U ■I EEL MI ii MCI 11 1 1111111111111111 I I I I I I I 1 111; 11 1 111111111111111111111111111111 SCALE: 1/6'61' -O' 11 NM IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIIIIII 3\81GNAGE SEEN III SEE SRI 1 /AG.3 TOR SW. ENLARGED ELEVATION 4 NORTH ELEVATION 5. SEE 51.0 1 /A6.1 FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION SEE SM 1/A6.3 FOR SOT. ENLARGED EL NATION --I SCALE: 1 /8" -1' -D' — FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER .A. HARTFORD MSH Warr ra ms 558 g11sl0am ne Wwsda 186 .n R. `d. maerNN 1111 lawsla Naomi a rear. Oar HYMO Iµiye I;W ue 10E2 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP sIl1DSa,CiE1N55* r952}761E0 tax ip32 }'MSffi PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE YLLLAGE'IRAE LMDLAES, MJ. ISSUE 1/1 /1005 L. REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER; 5® 0 09w14nr2l0 %kM71%mnaan NI, sxc. MOMECTSeaWx S B" ALUM. FASCIA COLOR - /1— VINYL SLIDING DOOR COLOR- /1— ALUM. BALCONY RAILING. COLOR - 91 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR- 91 TEATURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL "H" JOINT. COLOR- in ALUM. STORE FRONT COLOR- DRYER VENT COLOR - SIGN BAND COLOR- DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR - 91 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR - #2 VINYL SLIDING WINDOW nn. no %" RAISED 3" WADE SMOOTH FIBE 7� PANEL WINDOW ACCENT. COLOR - B" ALUM. FASCIA COLOR - g1 — TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR- 92 1' -6" PROFILED ALUM. CORNICE FASCIA COLOR- 92 4" RECESSED SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL ACCENT. COLOR- 93 — TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR- #2 V RAISED SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL ACCENT. COLOR- 93 3V" RAISED 3" WIDE SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT — PANEL WINDOW ACCENT PANEL COLOR - 93 grit ilk\ 1 --- IIII�O�I� III'11111� llll��� -- iu VINYL PAIR SINGLE HUNG WINDOW COLOR- 91 DRYER VENT COLOR - 92 ALUM. STORE FRONT COLOR- 91 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR- 94 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR- 93 11111111 4111110110 8" ALUM. FASCIA COLOR- *1 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR- 92 1 -6 PROFILED ALUM. CORNICE FASCIA COLOR - 92 TEATURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL "H" JOINT. COLOR- 92 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR- 92 3N RAISED 3" WIDE SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL WINDOW ACCENT. COLOR- 92 VINYL PAIR SINGLE HUNG WINDOW COLOR - 91 SIGN BAND FRAME PANEL COLOR- 91 DRYER VENT COLOR- 92 MECH LOUVER COLOR- 91 ALUM. STORE FRONT COLOR- 41 s IZoEs IF MIPaA h IEli 11lll[i IIIII;'rl[ll�llII wrI �s DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR- 93 DECORATVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR- 94 B" ALUM. FASCIA COLOR- 91 _— VINYL AIDING DOOR COLOR- 91 ALUM. BALCONY RAILING. COLOR- 91 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR- 91 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL "N" JOINT. COLOR- 91 UM. STORE FRONT COLOR- x1 ANVAS CANOPY COLOR- 91 __---� r- BECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR- 91 "ECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR- 92 ' R VENT COLOR- q1 IMAM ■ UM IR '.� simalammmmENTEiS •.0 f.A\ '•� rE ^F : ®vi P1 tlggpirr —• �! m i"r " : lip JM=Elli _u WSW n>mxe 11 I mmi Nom uswitami MOE rins BEIN s19NAy'E iiiiMEWSOMBEEMBEiraiblina TiV I; 1149,' . I msamaamasmumleg ISEISMENSEIMM • srPrAGE INSHIMCIIN 11 1,M all INIEISZOO 1 mi i9.i lili —r -' �� 1 MILOMICM IIUWE MINNOW 0 ENLARGED ELEVATION 6. WALL 1/4'.1. -0" FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER i�. HARTFORD ' CIROUP J mt�.' .4.14 mrtaf e.ISr 141 no pee, q..uml 1 A MA,.m pep. b2 x. tole .ry dies WNreMon and Mm I mi o 0A txae.m k<MAI IA . M. e,h m u. sow foimmaa ut< 14.x4 re< lk40mt n AL I0082 OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP FLR MAMA IN F>sr7n» FM tatZ-7•61,211 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -55020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE VILLAGE TRAd LYJOIAI5S, NN. ISSUE 8 /s /z00s L REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A6.1 4) awriusgr ..o...,A,.OL, aa,. AE.1Nc...ao,ERSe ,..nom In,�1111mu mNI STANDING SEAM MTL ROOF PARAPET COLOR- /2 1' -6" PROFILED ALUM. CORNICE FASCIA COLOR- 12 4" RECESSED SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL ACCENT. COLOR- /3 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR- /2 — k" RAISED 3" WIDE SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT — PANEL WINDOW ACCENT PANEL. COLOR- /3 fin" RAISES SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL ACCENT. COLOR - /3 VINYL PAIR SINGLE HUNG WINDOW COLOR- /1 MIL. SPACE FRAME CANOPY COLOR- /1 DRYER VENT COLOR - /2 ALUM. STORE FRONT COLOR- /1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR- #4 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR- #3 11,111 �I is in n 11n111 um iC IIMMIIRIMMISRIMANSISSPICM ENLARGED ELEVATION cii) 1 � 1 n� 1 1 i 1 IHCRS9.51ti B.iffiFM8 ... :. Vr IW�IV eml '3BIFIEIYS - -,_ WMIXEMEMILOSIMIS • t MILIWISNAMISIMEIMIZA IW705Ii 0K71i SONS 11 d 11 NINMINZi4W2E11VIIDW!•1 . •.. t1s1Imlr�lo »?J SCALE: 1/4'•1' -1' FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER .n. HARTFORD Mlµ aty IM Iln pm, q.Ntalm dimi 0.d 0.aW M l em a M 0G 1 NItNnN Ma11.1 v.1M pn of W AN al YFVwgo. 04. =_Iko. .. Ne. IOBG OWN ER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP ]21OSMl.EiRHLVE IiIH./INE N+ »a,m FAX 194)4161.1 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MHFA -05040 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE WLLOI E AIAL LNO LBIS, MU. ISSUE: 1/5/0055 REV. THIS SHEET 0 N REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A6.2 0 rn.........n..n...as A2lxc.ammsl.l9.21ml.... { 111111111 r W Gam: -._I rr 111111111 n e e 1 1 MIIIIN WIE=I�= �I MIINIMINNI ®�I .MI � —Ne - -- IMIIIIIIIMWIIRaINI1 pal= ►1 I ytt FAI�ill= , Iii. \. marl P � " � /MA11 •iw Par. P P J riMUMIIIII pI I II�1 1 IN�I� =PM 1 ENLARGED ELEVATION 6. 2 —G PROFILED ALUM. CORNICE FASCIA COLOR— p2 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL "H" JOINT. COLOR— Q2 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR — #2 i5" RAISED 3" WMOE SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL WINDOW ACCENT. COLOR— #2 VINYL SLIDING WINDOW COLOR — #1 DRYER VENT COLOR— y2 SIGN BAND COLOR— /1 MECH LOUVER COLOR— #1 ALUM. STORE FRONT COLOR— 11 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR— p2 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR— 11 8" ALUM. FASCIA COLOR— E'1 VINYL SLIDING DOOR COLOR— #1 DECK HALF WALL TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR— g2 ALUM. RAILING. COLOR— /1 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL SIDING. COLOR— /1 TEXTURED FIBER CEMENT PANEL "H" JOINT. COLOR— r1 LUM. STORE FRONT COLOR— (1 GN BAND COLOR— 01 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR— {1 DECORATIVE CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLOR— /2 SCALE: 1 / /•�i' -0• - FOR REVIEW ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD 'OP.OTIP A /E]NCJ Iaeq a.ur na 9x pn, gasAcAN at oapen we pNffee ot me van q men ape56On am A* I en a ny N49.1 knaen miff We bee b the aw m ie..e1o. Lpe NNW 4 Putt 8*66m pa. t096't OWNER LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP m �MI N11>K.1.1 FP%(9411961.1 PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: MNPA -05020 LAKEWOODS APARTMENTS LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE MAIM /RAIL IMO LAPES,5N. ISSUE: 1/s /zags L REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SH EET SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A6.3 COanaln9541.eWli(GNMadpwe e� „Mffee.effw,w.s,.....< • • 1111110RIIEEl1MMI1i11 Cl €NIIIn111111111PM 11111 IIIIIIfIIIIIIIII1IU li111Ii11�� I1111IIiIIIIIIEII1I IIIliiui111 EZIFI 53 _51 itirENSW. taxsammw • aimmoramissnommarmans wee mwa E MEE • AGENDA ITEM V.B.4 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: October 12, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plat - Village No. 4 Hartford Development, Inc. BACKGROUND Hartford Development, Inc. has submitted the final plat for Village No. 4, which encompasses Outlots A, and E of Village No. 3. The submitted plat depicts 7 lots and three outlots. Block 1 will consist of four lots. Lot 1 is intended for the apartment/retail building, and Lot 4 is intended for the hotel (both buildings are a part of this agenda). Lot 2 and 3 (and Outlot A) are intended for future buildings. Block 2 will consist of three lots. Lot 1 is intended for the shared parking area, Lot 2 is intended for Betty's Pies, and lot 3 is intended for a future user. Two outlots are included that will also be for future uses. The title commitment for the property and final plat has been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the final plat for The Village No.4 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION The final plat significantly conforms to the Land Use and Regulating Plans of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide, therefore staff is recommending approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Final Plat submitted September 7, 2005. • • / / / 80 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / _ / / / i1� / / - -r / / / / • w.cor CJ.0 Found 1/2" ron Mos / Right of Acceas in favor of ;LW in sly line of 1 -35W J- / of MN d -n / r 1 TI IE yIU..AE NO. 4 MOW' G1. ' rr 0 ass -G 99 /MOOT cast / Iran Mawm.n 2465 — /4 1;,44,-..e j 1 • :1, / 1 N6e73'45'W 176.30 3 250.72 202.08 N89 °33'45 "W 452.80 .. ..6 �k 98 6n }_. / N ' // s, % , Chrd.= 395543 °31'53 "W I Chrd.Brg•=„ -__,L_ p=25o '45 _- 1 R =90.00 39.87 ;___ 10 • NC)0p 60a x 11 b. ti r,, / .5 1 / 2 A./ b49fi k3 1i }14 -- ,1 11 sas31'4rw eb, ee.13 r 151.65 ,.. 661'51'47'E =LOTC as 252.67 36.5,. S89 °51'47 "W ! 303.25 / Th. 490i11ne of Oueot 6, THE MLI..ACE NO. 3-- O ti 4i� ti n� .`\ ///O / r 0 N 2 / ti 94 + / n• / /;`- �13 bb. 9 / � ' )' // 17 m _7', / .D` - - i e• r 0 DENCTES RIGHT -OF- ACCESS DEDICATED TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA (AS 'DEDICATED ON THE RECORD PLAT OF THE VILLAGE NO. 3 ") All monuments required by Minnesota Statute. and not shown on this plat, will be set within one year of the recording date of ttis plat. and shall be evidenced by a 1/2 Inch by 18 inch Iron pipe marked by RLS 44125. For ':he purposes of this plat the west line of Outlot E, THE V1LLFGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota, Is assumed to have a bearing of N25Y16'50 "E. • DENCTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT MARKED BY R.LS./44125 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) RECEIVED SEP O 7 2005 (CITY OF LINO LAKES G1ty of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 11, 731, R22 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Legacy Holdings -LL. LLC. a Minnesota corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the Clty of Lino Lakes. State of Minnesota, County of Anoka, to wit: Outlot A and Outlot E. THE VILLAGE NO. 3. Anoka County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as THE VILLAGE NO. 4 and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utlity easements as shown on this plot. LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC In witness whereof said Legacy Holdings -LL. LLC, a Minnesota corporation, hos caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 200 . John C. Brandt President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200_ by John C. Brant, president of Legacy Holdings -LL LLC, a Minnesota corporation. on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I hereby certify that I have surveyed and plotted the property described on this plot as THE VILLAGE NO. 4; that this plat 13 a correct representation of said survey, that all distances are correctly shown an the plat In feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments will be correctly placed in the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on said plat and that there are no wet lands as defined In Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 505.02 Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated other than os shown on sold plat. Eric R. Vickoryous, Land Surveyor Minnesota Registration No. 44125 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 200 , by Eric R. Vickaryous, Land Surveyor. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires This plat of THE V1LLAGE NO. 4 was approved by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 200 , and if applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the Clty or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, os provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By Mayor By Clerk This plot has been checked and approved this day of 200 . Larry D. Hakim Anoka County Surveyor GRAPHIC SCALE ao a SO 100 200 ,00 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 100 ft. B. G. RUC> 4 SONS, INC. Land Surveyors Si \rud\ CAD \03proj \03170PP \03170- ND -4.dwg 9/1/2005 131+21 PM CST