Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/09/2005 P&Z Packet• • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, November 9, 2005 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of October 12, 2005 minutes postponed to next meeting - IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING for Preliminary Plat, SMW Federal Credit Union, JADT Second Addition, 700 Apollo Drive — Paul Bengtson — THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT AND WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA AT THE MEETING B. Planned Unit Development Final Plan for the Chain of Lakes YMCA, 7690 Village Drive — Paul Bengtson C. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING to Amend the Planned Unit Development for Legacy at Woods Edge to include signage criteria — Paul Bengtson — This item will be continued to the Dec. 14, 2005 meeting VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. AUAR Update B. Architectural Review Committee for Legacy at Woods Edge C. Meeting Rules VII. ADJOURN • AGENDA ITEM V.A. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: November 9, 2005 TOPIC: WITHRAWAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION JADT SECOND ADDITION SHEET METAL WORKERS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION BACKGROUND The original application for the Sheet Metal Workers Federal Credit Union included a preliminary plat to combine lots 2 and 3 of block 1, JADT Addition. This accompanied a Site Plan Review for the proposed financial institution. The applicant has revised their plans and is withdrawing the Preliminary Plat application and intends to build exclusively on one of the existing lots. As the Site Plan Review is no longer accompanied by an additional land use entitlement request, it will be completed administratively. The public hearing for this item was properly noticed and therefore should be acknowledged at the meeting and the public should be informed that the application was withdrawn. • • AGENDA ITEM V.B. • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: November 9, 2005 TOPIC: Final Plan YMCA Legacy at Woods Edge BACKGROUND The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes YMCA has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a single tenant health club within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists only of the building plans for the YMCA, as the lot on which it is proposed to be built was already platted as part of the Village No. 3 final plat. The City of Lino Lakes formed a partnership with the Greater Saint Paul YMCA in 1998 to assist in the construction of a YMCA in Lino Lakes. In 2005 a contract was approved whereby the city agreed to provide 6.7 •cres of land, $1.5 million for construction, plus utilities to the site in exchange for a YMCA of approximately 50,000 square feet that includes a teen center, gym, indoor pools, cardiovascular /strength training area, aerobic studio, family program space and a child care area. In return, the YMCA agreed in part, to adhere to the principles of the Town Center Design Guidelines. The plans submitted indicate a first phase of development that will include 39,252 square feet of area spread over two floors. Future phases are proposed to include a gymnasium expansion of approximately 4,200 square feet and a swimming pool (natatorium) expansion of approximately 5,400 square feet. The office and meeting rooms located on the parking lot side of the building are single story, the gymnasium and swimming pool areas are open to the second floor, while the rest of the structure has the locker room facilities on the first floor and the cardiovascular and studio areas above. ANALYSIS Governing Plans This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit Development for the site. The proposed layout is significantly conforming to the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout that is included ipin the Development Guide. Though atypical to an `urban' development, the development's layout has always YMCA, page 2 acknowledged that this building was intended to take advantage of the surrounding natural environment as well s have minimal impact on the adjacent residential property by being setback from the street. These designs gave always indicated a connecting walkway through the parking lot of this site to link the YMCA facility with the streetscape; this is further discussed in the landscaping section of the staff report. The proposed YMCA building is located in a Civic Land Use Area and will be located on Lot 18 in Block C (according to the land use plan of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide). Acceptable Building Type is community facilities, such as libraries, City Hall, and community recreation such as the YMCA. The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates that there is no build -to line requirement for this portion of that block, nor is there any `Required Building Entries', nor any `Gateways' indicated for this site. Allowable Uses The proposed use for this site is a YMCA facility. The Lino Lakes Town Center Development & Design Guide classifies this use as `Indoor Recreation Facilities' and considers it a permissible use within the Civic District. The applicable section is included below: SECTION 3.1 ALLOWABLE USES Table 1. Allowable Land Uses in Mixed -Use Commercial, Commercial /Residential and Civic Districts Allowable Land Use Comm ercial Public and Quasi - Public Uses Indoor recreation facilities TABLE 1 NOTES: P = permitted use. Building Massing & Placement Mixed Use Civic The proposed building is not required to meet any build -to lines, therefore the placement of the building is being dictated more by the desire to take advantage of the natural environment surrounding the south and east sides of the site. The building is set back approximately 148 feet from the Village Drive right -of -way, 60 feet from the south property line, and 65 feet from the east property line. Again, because this building is not required to meet any build -to lines, the height of the structure is only dictated by the overall height limitation of 45 feet. The height of the building never exceeds 31.5 feet, therefore it is in conformance with the height standard. Architectural Standards Due to the setback from the right -of -way for the building, the primary entry is being placed on the parking lot side of the building. While this is atypical for an urban development like Legacy at Woods Edge, the location •of the building was always intended to be setback further from the street to take advantage of the natural YMCA, page 3 amenities of the site. The main entrance is connected to both Town Center Drive and Village Drive via pedestrian walkways through the parking areas. Staff feels that the overhang element proposed for the building entry needs to be strengthened to properly accentuate the main public entrances for the facility. The Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guidelines (LLTCDDG) typically require a base, middle, and top approach to the architecture within the Legacy at Woods Edge project. Staff has a very difficult time seeing the definition of a base, middle, and top for the current proposal. However, the LLTCDDG does include an allowance that if a building demonstrates `exceptional quality of design and materials' it does not need to specifically address the three recognizable elements. The building materials proposed for the site include tilt -up concrete panels; metal panels and brick veneer. The LLTCDDG requires materials to support regional traditions and to maintain a level of craft. It is very difficult to consider tilt -up concrete panels as meeting these requirements or that they be `exceptional' materials for construction. While they are technically a `masonry' material, they do not meet the intent of the guidelines which is to require materials that are aesthetically pleasing and architecturally significant. Staff has recommended some minimum changes to the concrete panels to make them more acceptable, but still does not support the use of this type of material anywhere within the Legacy at Woods Edge project. Staff understands that the recreational function of this building makes tilt -up concrete panels a preferred material of the applicant. This being said staff is recommending that the actual panels themselves demonstrate some additional design elements such as the corduroying that is depicted only on the far north and south corners of the west side of the elevation. Staff also recommends that the panels be made of a darker material so that the visual impact of the expansive wall is minimized. •urthermore, staff does not see anyway of recommending approval of the structure unless changes are made to clearly define the base, middle and top of the structure. Staff is recommending that a brick veneer be added to the concrete panels, at a height roughly equivalent to approximately one story to provide the proper scale. Some sort of an architectural element should also be added to the `top' of the structure that is appropriately scaled and complimentary to the design of the rest of the structure. The metal paneled portions of the site do not necessarily need a `base' element, though staff would encourage the use of a flat, lightly textured metal panel that will provide a contrast to the scalloped effect of the proposed metal paneling. Staff also has concerns with the corner and joint treatment of the proposed metal paneling and will need to see further detail from the applicant before completely supporting the use of the metal paneling. Throughout the portion of the structure that uses the brick veneer and metal paneling a cornice element must be added to clearly define the top of those portions of the building. The windows provided in the concrete panel portion of the building are inadequate to break up the monotonous wall face. Larger windows placed in either a horizontal or vertical pattern should be added. Though the small square windows are a positive secondary element to provide both a less institutional look and additional daylighting to the structure, they should not be the only interruptions to the rather blank, repetitive facade of the concrete panels. The design standards require a reveal of at least 2 inches from the exterior trim to create shadow for visual interest rather than windows and trim flush with the building. A condition is included with staff s • YMCA, page 4 recommendations to require a minimum two inch thick exterior trim be applied to all windows of this building Oa two inch recess be provided. he proposed structure has integrated minimal climatic response devices that meet the design guidelines. Daylighting of the interior space is being provided by the sparse number of windows, but should be enhanced to provide patrons a more natural, pleasing workout environment. Patrons of the establishment will also be offered minimal protection from the elements by the undersized entry feature. The site plan does not currently indicate a trash enclosure or any other mechanical equipment on the site plan. A revised site plan must clearly indicate the location of any ground level equipment, and the vehicular service routes for the site. Adequate screening of roof mounted equipment must be provided using a design and materials that complement the rest of the architecture. These screening devices must be indicated on revised elevation drawings. Parking Requirements Single Use Peak Hour Demand Net Floor Area (90% of G.F.A.) Parking Required Parking Provided Surplus 4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 43,967 s.f. 176 176 0 *The above calculation is based on the full build out (approximate total of 48,852 square feet gross floor area). Per Chapter 3.5 of the guidelines, the City is maintaining a shared parking analysis for the entire development. This analysis identifies peak parking demands at key times throughout the day. In the case of a health club, the peak period is identified as 5 PM on both weekdays. The proposed use is clearly being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout that the applicant has proposed with this application. Entire Block YMCA Single Use Peak Hour Demand Parking Peak (5 PM Weekdays) Parking Provided Surplus 4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 176 176 0 The proposed use is clearly being provided enough parking within the parking lot layout that the applicant has proposed with this application. Entire Block Single Use Peak Hour Demand Parking Peak (5 PM Weekdays) Parking Provided (street & off - street) Surplus Varies 270 281 11 The shared parking spreadsheet is based on the Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking Standards and as is required by the Development and Design Guidelines. As always, staff will continue to review each project to maintain the parking standards within this block as well as the entire development. With a building of this size, the-standards only require 5 bicycle parking spaces. Staff has included a condition requiring that the YMCA to provide a bicycle parking areas sufficient in size to accommodate at least 5 bicycles. Considering the recreational use of the building though, staff is encouraging the YMCA to provide capacity for closer to fifteen bicycles. • YMCA, page 5 Landscaping Requirements lits previously mentioned in the Parking section of the report, the site plan indicates a total of 176 parking spaces for this phase of the development. This means that the 23 trees provided throughout the lot exceeds the requirement of 1 tree for every 10 parking spaces. The parking lot on the north side of the building abuts Village Drive and therefore must provide additional screening. The applicant is proposing to meet the requirements of the design standards with a hedgerow of trees spaces 30 feet on center, with additional shrubbery. Staff is concerned that the shrubs chosen will not effectively screen the cars from view or the intrusion of headlight beams across the street into the residential portion of the site. Therefore staff is recommending that the shrub type be revised to a salt - tolerant shrub that will provide a year round screen measuring a minimum of 2 feet high at time of planting and a minimum of 4 feet high at maturity. Though the parking lot does not exceed the 300 space threshold to require a `connecting walkway' through the parking lot, a `connecting walkway' has always been indicated on the development plan for this site. The proposed connection meets the requirement for width, but it does not meet the requirements that the paving be decorative or that there be shade trees planted 25 feet on center. Additionally, the lighting fixtures are not properly identified so they must be reviewed for conformance. The YMCA site is proposed to use some innovative stormwater infiltration tanks as part of the on -site drainage plan. The location of these infiltration tanks is the south end of the parking lot; therefore the landscaping islands that are over these tanks cannot have trees in them as they would cause potential damage to the tanks. As such the Environmental Board has requested that these islands be integrated into the infiltration plan by being depressed with a rain garden -type landscape. The City's engineering consultant (S.E.H.) is evaluating is proposal to determine if it is feasible. Since this is a very `urban' development the implementation of a rain arden -type landscape will need to be heavily scrutinized. Staff is currently researching and developing a seed mix/planting pattern that will excel in both form and function. The south side of the site adjoins the County Park area and since some tree removal was necessary to complete grading and the construction of the retaining wall to allow eventual construction on this portion of the site; additional landscaping in the form of mixed Oak, Hackberry, Green Ash, Cherry and Red Maple trees should be added. As part of the land exchange to the YMCA the city is requiring the dedication of a conservation easement. The location of this easement has not been finalized. A tree preservation plan must be submitted by the YMCA to assist in the definition of this easement and to verify that significant specimens are properly protected throughout construction. The following landscape material changes are being requested by the Environmental Board: • Substitute Northern Pin Oak for Autumn Blaze Maples in some but not all locations. • Substitute White and/or Bur Oak for the Fall Gold Ash. • Substitute Red and White Pine for the Scotch and Austrian Pines. • Substitute Oaks for the Willows. The planting and maintenance of the restoration areas south of the trail shall be coordinated with the city's •mprovements on the site. As always, all landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. YMCA, page 6 Lighting She photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. A condition has been added that specifies the use of parking lot lighting in conformance with what has been required on all of the other sites within the development. Additionally, the lighting fixtures themselves must be submitted for review prior to this item being approved. The building itself will include some architectural and building entry lights mounted directly to the building. These fixtures will be used to highlight the building massing and will enhance the pedestrian environment. Additionally, as was discussed in the landscape section of the report, lighting fixtures are indicated within the `connecting walkway' area that is planned to connect the YMCA to the future building along the Town Center Drive street frontage; however, the design of these fixtures needs to be confirmed. Engineering The city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project is Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), and a memorandum including all of their comments is attached to the report. Any outstanding issues will be addressed through the site performance agreement and building permit process prior to construction. Final Plat Typical Planned Unit Development - Final Plan applications include a final plat for the site; however, since this property is currently owned by the City of Lino Lakes and not the master developer or the final occupant, the lot *as platted as part of the Village No. 3 plat that was previously approved by the City Council. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the October 26th regular meeting. Their comments are attached and are addressed in the landscaping portion of this report. OPTIONS 1. Table the Final Plan for the YMCA 2. Recommend approval of the Final Plan for the YMCA. 3. Recommend denial of the Final Plan for the YMCA. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending that this application be tabled until the following issues can be completely addressed through the submittal of revised plans: 1. The concrete panels must be corduroyed and be colored darker than the rest of the structure to minimize the visual impact. 2. A brick veneer base must be added to the concrete panels at a height roughly equivalent to a single story. 3. An architectural element must be added to the concrete panels to define the `top' of the structure. • YMCA, page 7 4. The developer is encouraged to provide a contrasting yet complimentary metal paneling element to the base of the structure that is proposed to be sheathed in metal paneling. 5. A cornice must be added to the brick veneer and metal panel sheathed portions of the structure. 6. The windows staggered throughout the concrete panel portion of the building must be enlarged and aligned or stacked in a more logical and pleasing pattern. 7. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim or two inch recess must be provided in accordance with the development standards for the site. 8. The overhang element proposed for the building entry needs to be strengthened to properly accentuate the main public entrances for the facility. 9. All lighting fixtures must be submitted and prove to be in conformance with the requirements of the LLTCDDG. 10. The shrubbery provided on the north side of the north parking lot must be revised to provide a salt - tolerant hedgerow that will provide a year round screen measuring a minimum of 2 feet high at time of planting and a minimum of 4 feet high at maturity. 11. The landscape materials must be substituted as outlined in the Environmental Board's Comments. 12. The landscape planters over the location of the infiltration tanks should be planted in a rain - garden type landscaping. This planting plan will be developed by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. 13. A tree preservation plan must be submitted by the applicant. 14. The lighting fixtures proposed for the site must be submitted for review. The parking lot fixtures should be consistent with the lighting already approved in other portions of the development. Once these recommendations have been addressed the following standard conditions will then be included as *art of staff's recommendation (additional conditions may arise due to revisions): 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height; shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be located within landscape planter islands. 5. The applicant shall provide a bicycle parking area sufficient in size to accommodate a minimum of five bicycles. The type of fixture provided and the location of this parking area must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. 6. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. ATTACHMENTS 1. S.E.H. memorandum dated November 3, 2005. 2. Environmental Board memorandum from the October 26, 2005 meeting. 3. YMCA plan set received October 10, 2005. 410 SE1," H • November 3, 2005 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota YMCA Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.11 SPCV Identified below are our review comments for the proposed YMCA site at Legacy at Woods Edge, prepared by Glenn Rehbein Companies. Plans for the proposed building were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on October 10, 2005. Plat 1. The updated drainage and utility easement needs to be shown. Preliminary Site Plan (Sheet C1.0) 1. The trash enclosure area is not shown as on the Ankeny Kell site plan. 2. The phased parking boundary line in the southwest comer, at the entrance drive, is not reflective of what will be built as a part of the public improvements. As shown, it will not match up with the public improvements construction. Coordinate with SEH to get the correct information. 3. Coordinate with SEH to get the correct retaining wall locations. 4. Dimensioning should be provided for the typical parking stalls and drive aisles. 5. The southern end of the drop -off zone in front of the building has a rather abrupt transition from the main drive aisle. It may function better with a more gradual transition similar to the north side of the drop -off zone. 6. There is no indication given as to what the surfacing and section of the service road will be. Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C1.01) 1. Spot elevations should be placed at each end of the curb cut north of CBMH 4. 2. Coordinate with SEH to verify proper elevations in the southwest entrance drive. 3. Coordinate with SEH on proper wall location and elevations. 4. There are no details shown for the curb cuts in the median islands. A detail should be shown dimensioning the size of the curb cuts. 5. The spot elevations at the north entrance off of Village Drive should be revised to match the elevations shown on the Village Drive plans in the Legacy at Woods Edge — Phase 1 plan set. 6. The grading plan shows the grading for the entire parking lot. If the lot is only being built to the phase line, it appears that in the southwest area of the Phase 1 parking lot will have the existing ground higher than the parking lot surface. It is suggested that the plan show the necessary grading Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite 8, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax • • • Mr. Michael Grochala November 2, 2005 Page 2 actions to match the existing ground along with the required seeding and erosion control measures. The future phase plans will then show the earthwork required to match the Phase 1 parking. 7. What provisions are being made for temporary curbing where the future underground parking entrance is at the building near the north entrance off of Village Drive? Some sort of curb will be required to contain the runoff that will already be traveling in the gutter flow line. 8. It is recommended that spot elevations be revised on the curb at the parking entrance drive aisle just south of Catch Basin 3 to demonstrate a high point or ridge to contain runoff flowing from the parking area into the main drive aisle, then north to Village Drive. 9. Are any trees being impacted by the grading operations on the south and southeast sides if the project? Impacted trees should be shown on the plans. 10. According to the submitted calculations, there is a very large amount of runoff being directed to CB 10 and CBMH 4 (9.65 cfs). Utilizing Neenah orifice flow calculations, these two Neenah catch basin grates will not be able to handle this flow, resulting in ponding at this location. It appears a significant amount of flooding of the main drive aisle would result in a 10 -year storm event. Additional storm sewer catch basins should be utilized in the parking lot to collect some of this runoff before reaching the southern end. 11. Coordinate with SEH on the exact location of the storm sewer chamber system. This will affect the location of STMH 5 in the median. 12. Roof drain locations for the YMCA building should be shown on this plan. 13. The amount of runoff flowing into the basin at FES 11 is not shown. It is recommended that rip rap, or some other acceptable method of erosion control, be placed from FES 12 all the way to the base of the slope at the wetland to prevent erosion from the discharge out of FES 12. 14. Show pipe sizes on the plan for the storm sewer run from CB 3 to the existing manhole on the north end of the site. 15. Spot elevations should be shown at all major building corners. 16. Storm Manhole 5 should have a 2' sump in it to aid in sediment collection before runoff enters the storm chamber system. 17. Pond 3 has a normal water line (NWL) of 888.4 and a high water line (HWL) of 889.7 after final design of the public improvements. Please change Pond 3 information to reflect this. 18. When changing pipe sizes across a manhole or catch basin, match crown elevations, if at all possible, to preserve hydraulic grade line instead of matching invert elevations. Preliminary Utility Plan (C1.02) 1. Coordinate with SEH to show the revised water main through the YMCA site. 2. Note that the sanitary sewer near SSMH 1 will need to be installed under existing water main. 3. The 6" and 8" water main services should have 45° bends near the building rather than the 90° bends shown. 4. Coordinate the water main connections on Village Drive with SEH to ensure they are completed before bituminous surfacing is placed. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite B, Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax • • • Mr. Michael Grochala November 2, 2005 Page 3 5. Dimension, or call out with notes, the horizontal separation between the water main and sanitary sewer lines. Preliminary Detail Sheet (C1.04) 1. All manhole and catch basin details need to call out the usage of Infi- Shield or equal neoprene sealing sleeves around the rings and casting. 2. The typical sidewalk section detail has a typo calling out sidewalk to be 6" wide. Landscaping Plan 1. Trees cannot be planted in medians that are located above the StormTech storm sewer chambers. Site Plan by Ankeny Kell 1. It is suggested that a walk be placed from each of the accessible parking loading aisles to the main walk through the median area. This will provide an accessible route that will not force people out into the parking lot and drive aisles to access the crosswalk to the main entrance. Please call me at 651.765.2912 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Stefan T. Higgins, PE Project Engineer xAko \linoh030503 \ymca revicw \ymca revicw.doc Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1701 West Knapp Street, Suite B. Rice Lake, WI 54868 -1350 SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com 1 715.236.4000 1 715.234.4069 fax • Recommendations Lino Lakes Environmental Board October 26, 2005 The following recommendations were made at the October 26. 2005 Environmental Board Meeting Preliminary Site Plan Review/YMCA/The Village #3 • Remove trees from the parking lot islands that are over the infiltration tanks. Make these islands depress ional and a part of the infiltration plan. Slope the parking lot to these islands. Plant a Rain Garden- type of landscape in the two depressional islands. • Landscape areas: Infiltration areas should be constructed with low - compaction equipment. All turf areas should be thoroughly tilled after top soil is spread. Verification of this practice should be done by the Environmental Division of the City. It is suggested that escrow dollars be applied form this work. • Change some of the Autumn Blaze maples to Northern Pin Oak. The Pin oaks give the same fall color effects as the Autumn Blaze Maples and are not as sensitive to lack of timely pruning. Short term losses to the Autumn Blaze Maples can be expected if timely pruning is not applied. Substitute White or /and Bur oak for the Fall Gold Ash. Fall Gold Ash has been removed from the City planting list because of massive tree failure. One of the original intents of The Village was to meld development into the existing natural (Regional Park) landscape. Therefore the same tree substitutions of Oaks for Willows should be made. The proposed Scotch and Austrian Pine should be changed to Red pine and White Pine. More trees should be designed along the area to the South bordering the wetlands where trees were lost due to project clearing. These trees could be any combination of native Oak, Hackberry, Green Ash, Cherry and Red Maple. • Under the Planting Notes of the Project Design Sheets, loamy backfill into the planting holes should be avoided. Trees should be backfilled with existing soils. • Turf areas should be tilled as deep as possible into the subsoil after topsoil is spread. Verification of this cultural practice should be done by the Environmental Division of the City. It is suggested that some escrow applied for this work. • The City Native Seed mix should be used in pond and restoration areas south of the trail. Sod areas should be shown on the plan as irrigated. Seed labels must be verified before seeding begins. The developer should hire a landscape contractor knowledgeable in the in installation and maintenance of native plants. A contract with such a company should be submitted to the City for approval. The company should be hired for a minimum of 3 to 5 years. • The YMCA should submit a Tree preservation Plan that identifies all significant trees within 50 feet of the construction area. Significant trees on the perimeter of the project must be protected with a 4 -foot orange snow fence. This fence must be installed before construction begins. • • • • Somewhere on the Erosion Control Plan it must be indicated the location on the site where the erosion control plan will be located, along with required weekly and post rainfall event inspection reports. A contact and phone number should also be listed for the responsible site NPDES Supervisor. The plan should note that additional rock will be stockpiled or brought in should the rock entrance become dysfunctional due to rock -pore filling. All storm sewer catch basins should be protected with an approved device such as the Royal Infrasafe Collection Device. • No soils should be imported or exported without City approval. • A post development BMP plan should be written and be part of an over all BMP /Maintenance for the Woods Edge Development. • The proposed Conservation Easement for the site should be written to minimize tree and plant loss. Signs should be placed at the Easement. Motion to approve by Bor, Second by Bauman. All were in favor. THE vN..L.AE NO. 3 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the City of Lino Lakes. a municipal corporation, fee owner. and Legacy Holdings -LL. LLC. a Minnesoto corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated in the City of Lino Lakes, State of Minnesota. County of Anoka, to wit: That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22. Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southeasterly of 135W; EXCEPT the East 920.00 feet thereof and EXCEPT the South 180.00 feet of the West 1210.00 feet of said North Half of the Northeast Quarter. Subject to any easements or valid restrictions of record. and That part of Government Lot 2, lying with the Northeost Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described 'Line A" and north of a line described as commencing of the center of Section 17; thence on on assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 22 minutes 54 seconds East along the west line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 17 a distance of 833.02 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 28 seconds East 336.61 feet to below described "Line A" and there terminating. "Line A" is descrbed as commencing at a point on the north line of said Section 17 distant 850.00 feet east of the north quarter comer of sold Section 17; thence southwesterly to a point on the east and west quarter line of said Section 17 distant 100.00 feet east of the center of said Section 17 and there terminating. and That port of Government Lot 2 lying within the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the center of said Section 17; thence on on assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 22 minutes 54 seconds East along the west line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 583.02 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 0 degrees 22 minutes 51 seconds East along said west line a distance of 250.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 28 seconds East 336.31 feet to a line hereinafter referred to as "Line A'; thence southwesterly along said 'Line A' to Its intersection with a line bearing South 65 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence North 65 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West 258.02 feet to the point of beginning. "Line A" is described as commencing at a point on the north line of said Section 17 distant 850.00 feet east of the north quarter corner of said Section 17; thence southwesterly to o point on the east and west quarter line of said Section 17 distant 100.00 feet east of the center of said Section 17 and there terminating. and That port of Government Lot 2, within the Northeast Ouorter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota lying northerly of the south 280 feet of said Northeast Quarter. and lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing of a point on the north line of said Section 17 distant 850.00 feet east from the north quarter corner of sold Section 17; thence southwesterly to a point on the east and west quarter line of said Section 17 distant 100.00 feet east from the center of said Section 17 and there terminating. EXCEPT that part of the above parcel of land which is described as beginning at the southeast corner of said parcel; thence on on assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 13 minutes 58 seconds East along the east line of said Govemment Lot 2, o distance of 593.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes West 223.00 feet; thence North 0 degrees 13 minutes 58 seconds East 93.34 feet; thence North 36 degrees 27 minutes West 89.48 feet; thence North 76 degrees 14 minutes West 90.74 feet; thence South 88 degrees 04 minutes West 152.81 feet; thence South 79 degrees 48 minutes West 132.97 feet; thence South 59 degrees 05 minutes West 128.48 feet; thence South 32 degrees 40 minutes West 59.62 feet; thence South 04 degrees 52 minutes East 37.00 feet; thence South 32 degrees 23 minutes East 35.61 feet; thence South 69 degrees 59 minutes East 129.79 fret; thence South 49 degrees 06 minutes East 132.65 feet; thence South 71 degrees 19 minutes East 91.82 feet; thence South 00 degrees 33 minutes 08 seconds West 403.87 feet to the north line of the South 280 feet of said Northeast Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 26 minutes 52 seconds East along said north line of the South 280 feet a distance of 460.00 feet to the point of beginning. and Outlots A. and B. THE VILLAGE NO. 1, Anoka County, Minnesota. and The North 60.00 feet of the South 180.00 feet of the East 100.00 feet of the West 1210.00 feet of the North Holt of the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as THE VILLAGE NO. 3 and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the Parkway's, Drive's, Boulevard, Interstate Highway, Pork, and drainage and utility easements and way as shown on this plat. Also dedicating to the County of Anoka the right of access to the State Trunk Highway 49 and dedicating to the State of Minnesota the right of access to Interstate Highway No. 35W. In witness whereof sold City of Lino Lakes, o municipal corporation. has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this _ day of 200 . The City of Lino Lakes City Mayor City Clerk John Bergeson Gordon Heitke STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument wos acknowledged before me this _ day of Moyor of the City of Lino Lakes, o municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County. Minnesota My Commission Expires 200_ by John Bergeson, City of Lino Lakes County of' Anoka Part of Section 11, T31, R22 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 200_, by Gordon Heitke, City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation. on behalf of the corporotion. Notary Public. County, Minnesota My Commission Expires LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC In witness whereof said Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC. a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of "� 200_. John C. Brandt President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200- by John C. Brant, president of Legacy Holdings -LL. LLC, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I hereby certify that I hove surveyed and plotted the property described on this plot as THE VILLAGE NO. 3; that this plot is a correct representation of said survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plot in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments will be correctly placed In the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines ore correctly designated on said plat and that there ore no wet lends as defined in Minnesota Statutes. Sec. 505.02 Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated other than as shown on said plat. Eric R. Vickaryous, Land Surveyor Minnesota Registration No. 44125 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this _ day of Vickaryous, Land Surveyor. 200___, by Eric R. Notary Public, County, Minnesoto My Commission Expires This plot of THE VILLAGE NO. 3 was approved by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 200 , and if applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer hove been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By Mayor By Clerk This plat has been checked and approved this _ day of 200__. Lorry D. Holum Anoka County Surveyor E. G. Fez) 4 SONS, INC. Land Surveyors iar \rud \CF.0 \03proj \0317OPP \03170 - FINAL- PLAT -3.dwg 9/1/2005 10,1B.54 AM CST SHEET 1 OP 3 SHEETS THE vN.L.E NO. 3 N1/4 cor. See.17 - - -'i (Coat Iron Monmm�.nit) i T / / / / / / / / / / / - 85.000 - r -North line of the NE1 /4 of Sec. 17, hp. 31. Rng. 22. J / / / / — — ' / / / --- --'fl -- -- o, / /I / / 54 *, rep . .. 4_1 \� 4gba4 ,p A . o:I - V a\ o `S y.W 11 /I / / ssy / / p ` N 561 / / / 410007 01.12 / / ". 0 on° 0�4 / cbC3 b• iu b.,..534 4 eQ9 taa / . / S / /e;r Dt ��� .5t.; ,e `56 T City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 11, T31, R22 a LOSU' ,pen°ge ' 7.2.000 ' 11� / /....'-.....• i.xM 1/Y ken PIM-- Dom', /.f ��: � RLS /9900 / ' / lo Novo' d St _72. -S / / Right ° ,ong e1y IMte of r35W — r /1 / / _ _ - - Fauna S i / / / /-' PIP. R / / / / / / �'�� - yILI.AGE DRIVE7= / / // / / c? IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI 111n11I11N1111II1111IIIIIlI1111III11HtIlIIlI1111111111111111i1III111I11111 111111 III IIII III IIIIIIII I IIIII)f/{{( luliul IIIII 'hi ❑ IIIIIIII lullllllll 111191 111 111111 II I I IIIII 1 Y / / 1 1 Txl� I 11 i' qy / / / / / / v,. b... / / / ., /;. / . / / if / / / •5 .1 .. . / .'4 ! .. W tMM1� ��qg �1 ti 452.80 A � 4' Sa97Y45T 46539 VILLAGE -North line of the South 180 feet /'1 of the 01/2 of the NE1 /4 / V oo r OUTL ©T E DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT MARKED AS MARKED —e— DENOTES RIGHT-OF-ACCESS DEDICATED TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA All monuments required by Minnesoto Statute, and not shown on this plot. will be sat within one year of the recording dote of this plat, and shall be evidenced by o 1/2 inch by 18 inch iron pipe marked by RLS 44125. For the purposes of this plot the East line of the SWI /4 of the NE1 /4 of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, is assumed to hove o beoring of 500'00'19 -E. 04 ¢' 0 0 'ii° •A'97 Eol IRS �� ,ar"° A407117.3- R 7.000 ° °..".•.P 8 8-1§I 1 . ' n91" °ems & _ .... L L -- *.-- --- I•:I._'_ e. 290.86 �": `, 0 N6.973 451V DRIVE *.0.0,.0.0, >,r• 1111 /111111llIIII11e111111111111 , 11119ti111111111■11111111111i1u1I / S `iNO•eh line of .h a -w z9.11 _4500'2615"r 29.66 0' 479.73 27592 i-0rdneq and Utility I T Comma n o 0... Drtl,a9e".le 11[9x41 -- F• 1 _ -laaor I I III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllll111111h1 {IIIIIIII ��. Illilllll lXIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIa IIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111111I111 I I trut901/4 M' xw 77 T.p.031. Rlp 22 — Govt Lot 2, Sea 17. Top. 31. / q ia0o',' 58974'06'E 1e I tz ;at ig GRAPHIC SCALE ,00 ( 10 FEET ) 1 inch . 100 ft- -58 '448'E NTH 2 a Slr AT•HUNE. SEE AL 1111111 111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII [111111111111111111 JRL N00 °09'18 "W 389°"." 9 "E 50 cd• Ro4 0200o-- Sj-- -J z O Fn— L_t U X w 4 920.00- i4 - - -e SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS I I IIIIIIII 111111 IIII III II III II IIII I 1 111111 IIIIIl11111i 111 N89 °3345 "W 398.91 South One of 01/2 of NE1 /4 of- See. 17, Top. 31, Rng. 22. 1111111111111111111 SS Meta County Iron P4. — — — E. G. RUM 4 SONS, INC. Land Surveyors rxr S' \rud\ CAD \03proj \03170PP \03170 - FINAL- PL AT -3.dwg 9/1/2005 101834 AM CST SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS OCT 2 0 2005 • THE V11-1-4GE NO. 3 / / / / / _ . ..,.. '. P.•-'7'..- ' 4t+T" '' ."- - /1 46;43 / / / • ' '7,- VLLAGE DFIVE-, , , 4 / / / -. / 1 / oillillivintill........ythiniumii.immaimiiiiiilinrniuuniinth..........T.Rti......26,1 / / / / z 4.. / / /4-- // , , / c -r / / NI• / 21-i ::/ ,• i‘■ .=- - 140' 14; 49 k iv 61.4 4 0 47114120 2 .1°"tv --;)TOWNI 'Sr 11111 Itti111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 .." ...,,, .T.12; igs 1 fewernent", 1/4Q0,1.1. le 4, :11111111111111111.E.111:111:12:11.:1:7-1141.,111:1111Z10111211111..111.1111111w111111110.111111I1111111 11111111111111111111111011111111111111 IiiiiiMiliiillnill1111111111111N1111 \ 17, Tub 31, Ftnq 22 , 02 --North line of Gov't Lot 2, See. 17, Terp.1, _II 1 S a3 Sag4P:1 ':::'‘1';.'74d :1i 1 1 f F347-E 207.22' iLi42_ 1..°77 833 3'4_ •Wi3ISP,T1 ,64g, -- 21>rilroinage one/ Utility Eoxmoni..741.--- tg S- ....11%;7.32.21....4 7,11:1-i ,719?,32.13.9'.73.! ...N. N87;649.2.8.481:9"7:i. W741- - ...........i19.:.:20.`1).- : onty,perLmigdelEnlnQwet,intnelontoeiA.159s6gy,..44, c-,,s,r,:, 4 ''/ 0 g „ beik../41 ilk. .;,..- AL _, As. • _ i 1 I ci o Aj.340 ' ■ li o o cn ,- 2 8 op at 41/ ..ts 4 P•sio7 flt - fAl:' S8941 47'w 5-M31 CENTEil V1-121-41.)/ 340.01 / (le* L& 9 100.00 sotw a. k 4154st,y —1,„„471-_----/Y_O-6, - 7/Tv -...../ 's , —.1 A. /--.. N7 29 7---t-'35,61 <LJ A. 17v \17" A. 'Psr 1,1 A i _1, , . 1 < . 1 - vv.. I/ \ ....% • ••••,•0 3 ' . 01 .,\ s, N c6 '..--\ .; 0 ( 1 'S- Y . • E .44‘ 06V574€'1''t , ,.."; -fr locos $ , S89°4109E ' , e' AL I < • •••••• N00 °18'51 "E 1 111 '° 1 41 .,,41 gt g k tvg&ym 1461Mg?:!:14, P7i5:?:4nN • - 1013.04 0817.3345-E 223.00 N89d59'43"E Q S00 °00'19 "E 682.15 North fine of SPA, 200 feet of Government Lot 2--"" Sc, 17, Twp. 31. Rng. 22 -0- DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT MARKED AS MARKED DENOTES RIGHT-OF-ACCESS DEDICATED TO ANOKA COUNTY All monuments required by Minnesota Statute, and not shown on this plat, will be set within one year of the recording dote of this plot, and shall be evidenced by a 1/2 inch by 18 inch Iron pipe marked by RLS 44125. For the purposes of this plat the East line of the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 17, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, is assumed to have a bearing of SD0I00/19*E. ,...--South line of NE1/4 of Sec 77, Twp. 31. NIS 22 GRAPHIC SCALE 300 *moo 400 ( 114 FEET ) inch . 100 ON Of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 17, T31, 1R2 2 11111111C1:1111111111111111111111111■1111111111111111 ATCHLINE. SEE 212,22 398,91 South line of N1/2 of NE1/4 of.-- Sec. 17, Twp. 31, Rng. 22. SHEET 2 Cf 3 SHEETS 111611111611■6161R6166105timmi616thileum AIL An0k0 County Iron Pipe NORTI E. G. IRUD 4 SONS, INC. Land Surveyors SArud•CAD•03p,oj•03170PPl03170-F1NAL-PLAT-3bwg 9/1/2005 10a9,34 All CST SHEET 3 OP 3 64-1EVS • OCT 1 (!, 2005 ores---teetad (REVISIONS BY\ YMCA _ ND LAKES ((, 1111 U WNW 517E PLAN BUILDING REVIEW SUBMITTAL UNO LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 10, 2005 (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) GRAPHIC SCALE ( 61 PECI' ) va-A-ma woof LIMIII11111111111111a1111 PROPERTY UNE PHASED PARKING BOUNOARY,BNE 4 • 11 MOP CBMH2 'MH .1 t EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL UTILITIES, BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT: TWIN CITY AREA (651) 454 -0002 MN TOLL FREE (800) 252 -1166 PROPERTY UNE t LEGEND' EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR — 90-- - - - - -- EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR - - -- -BOO - PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR �1PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING WETLAND 411' WETLAND VEGETATION SYMBOL EXISTING SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE DRAINAGE DIRECTION 1.0794 -A PROP05ED SANITARY SEWER —0 —s PROPOSED WATERMAIN 1- PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY UNE PHASED PARKING BOUNDARY LINE • -• PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE CD PROPOSED STORM CATCH a ®, BASIN /MANHOLE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET RIP RAP -J 0 uJ DRANTT BAD €0460 B05 DATE 10 -10 -2005 VERTICAL SCALE HORIZ N/A :10' JOB NO. 05513 BODH PAGE SHEET c1.00 OF SHEETS) OCT 1 ` 2005 ap ( YMCA L NO LAKES SITE PLAN BUILDING REVIEW SUBMITTAL LINO LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 10, 2005 (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) GRAPHIC SCALE �1�1�1ot1. 1' FFE 906.5 11 FFE 906.5• INSTALL ROCK 3/AMMO - TRIANCE _301 -11, QI+, 'IR 06 INSTALL 12' D412 AND GUTTER WITH TAREPo;7AB812 A MOWN --AND 5DU OF SERVICE LRNEi FFE 903 - / -g I \\ / ( '14 •I1 POND-"3 ji 1/1' 1 NWL 888.0 HWL 890.8 r1 I +' r % + ° t ; ▪ „r1 :1 if \ r/ r / 1 1 03/ I o �. 1' ` \ . '( ' \ 41\ I \ ♦1 `♦ / ` \ 1 ♦ LO \6 1 . i `\/ 1 1 I. \ . \ C/1 I 1 \ I I �\ \ 1 1 • 1 1 �'\ \ I I \ . \P I 1 ` 111 11 1 \ \\ I 1 I. \\ 1 1 \ � ) I 1 ♦\ 1 11.� ��\ \ 9s / i I • 1\ I\ A\ \\ `80 / 1 / 1\ \ �, I( \ \ \ \ I \ C; - 1 1 1 6.\ i \ \ \ \ y \\ •\ . I 1 1 1 . \ \ \\\ CP 1 1 `,1 \\\\:\I I I I I 1 \ 1 / l 1 \ 1 1 11.1 / / 1 1 '\ p I 1 1 1 I11 9 / 1 1 D7 1 1 � I I I I �I 1 �\ 1, 1 1 f 1 1 1 5609/ 66 26600 I . I 1 I / 1 AMERICAN GREEN 515UB.1 1 1 1 1 1 �9iG / 1 1 1 \� ♦ ERASION CONTROL I .I 1 1 1 \ \ J 1 .1 • BLANK . OR` EEPROV® 1 1 1 \ 11 \\ EOM. AND SEED 1 1 1'1 11 11 ' 1 \\ -- \\ I 1. ♦ 1 1 I 1 I ♦\ ,, 1 1 1 I 1`♦ 1' 1 1 1 1 / 1 I \ ✓ 1 1 1 I 1 I L�S3--- t- y__. - -- _ �' /_- .-�"L INSJALL_ IjORAi-- -_ -'-� /4-_ LDLATION•O�-- 1 \� EROSION, CONTROL OR APPROVED �� AMERICAN �$EEV- GREEN . EX13'TOJ69LT FESIT EROSION, - ___FENCE- �___rcrv-ssay ------ UAL AND SEED - �� _ -- -- ALIP S9i _--- =— 890` f1iNCS„ / \ i - -- -''_ —Q� / \ 1 \ 111 11 \, 9, L01111A0. 111 ,Y 10 ! /„""-::;.\-9-...-'1/1,1,/,, EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL UTILITIES, BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT: TWIN CITY AREA (651) 454 -0002 MN TOLL FREE (800) 252 -1166 In \ I \1I \'1\\ \ / r ' j 1 1I 61� \1\ 11 \ \\ \ .7--...,/ ' ' / 1 I 1 /I I \11111\ \ \\ \\ l / ' ) I I (111111 60\ \ 1 I 1 1 It9 ♦ /� / NOTES 1. SILT FENCE UNITS TO BE STAKED. 2. SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED DOWN HILL FROM ANY OF THE GRADING ACTIVITY. FIELD DECISIONS TO BE MADE REGARDING THE PLACEMENT OF SILT FENCE. 3. SILT FENCE TO SERVE AS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 4. SITE WORK SHALL BEGIN ONCE SILT FENCE IS INSTALLED. 5. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN 6. SILT FENCE TO BE MAINTAINED. 7. SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS STEEPER THAN 3:1 WITHIN ONE WEEK OF FINAL DISTURBANCE. SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS BETWEEN 10:1 AND 3:1 WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF FINAL DISTURBANCE. SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS FLATTER THAN 10:1 WITHIN 21 DAYS OF FINAL DISTURBANCE. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE MNOOT SPEC. 3676, MIXTURE 1300 (OR EQUIVALENT), AT A RATE OF 100 Lbs /ACRE (BULK WEIGHT). MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1. MULCH RATE SHALL BE DISC- ANCHORED AT A RATE OF TWO TONS PER ACRE. 8. A STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE MPCA FOR THE LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE DEVELOPMENT. SEE SWPPP FOR TEMPORARY AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 9. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SWPPP. MEASURES SHALL CONSIST OF BUT NOT UNITED TO SILT FENCE, SEED AND MULCH, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS, ETC. 10. HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 7:OOAM -7:00 PM MON. -SAT. 11. EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL UTIUTIES, BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT: TWIN CITY AREA (651) 454 -0002 MN TOLL FREE (800) 252 -1166 12. CONTACT BRETT BAILLY, P.E. AT GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES AT (753) 784 -0657 WITH QUESTIONS. LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR DUSTING CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION •00155 EXISTING WETLAND - - -- WEILMID VEGETARON SYMBOL EXISTING SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE DRMNAGE DIRECTION 1.875 -6 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED 641066AIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE - - -- PHASED PARKING BOUNDARY LINE --•--•--• - PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE m PROPOSED STORM CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE PROPOSED SIDEWALK 501 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET `/ REVISIONS BY\ 6 o 10 -10 -2005 YE-AREAL 5 N A C1.01 PACE OF SHEETS) YMCA - L \O L • FFE 906.5 7 K ®S SITE PLAN BUILDING REVIEW SUBMITTAL LINO LAKES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 10. 2005 (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) III II 1 111111111111111101 is tf FFE 906.5 N 09 / i 1'• FFE 903 5DP. inrg ''' ' 0 C EANGUT NV 49 M O O LL! f / rr EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL UTILITIES, BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT TWIN CITY AREA (651) 454 -0002 MN TOLL FREE (800) 252 -1166 i 1 GRAPHIC SCALE l 1 616160) 1'MO' tUT1uTY 6071'00 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE 10' PVC SDR 35 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 3. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE DIP CL52 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 4. WATERMAIN TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8.0' OF COVER. 5. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN CROSSINGS TO HAVE MINIMUM OF 18' VERTICAL SEPARATION. 6. CITY ENGINEER MUST BE CONTACTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO WORK IN ROW OR UTILITY CONNECTIONS. 7. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF LINO LAKES, AND CEAM. 11. ROW MUST BE RESTORED TO CITY ENGINEER'S SATISFACTION. 12. CONTACT BRETT BAILLY, P.E. AT GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES ® 763 - 784 -0657 WITH QUESTIONS. 13. MEGALUGS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN MECHANICAL JOINTS. LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR 901 EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR — - - -�00- PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION •103.'+s EXISTING WEILAND --- - - - - WETLAND VEGETATION SYMBOL EXISTING SILT FENCE PROPOSED SILT FENCE DRAINAGE DIRECTION 1.57% -> PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN —1 PROPOSED STORM SEWER a >— PROPERTY UNE ---- - - - - -- PHASEDPARKING BOUNDARY UNE--•--•---•-•-•-,---•-.-•-- PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE PROPOSED STORM CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (REVISIONS BB\ DRAWN eOP CHECKED BOB 0A1E 10 -10 -2005 VERTICAL MALE HOAR. N/A P NOB H0. 05513 91EET C1.02 OF SHEETS,/ BOCK PAGE YMCA B612 CURB TYPICAL CYILF•0.0474 LF /CY ° 21.1 NOTE - ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE B612. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. - INSTALL CURB AS RP IN OR TIP OUT AS REQUIRED. 'f _AK t0 ■/z11 MN /DOT D412 CONC. CURB & GUTTER E6 SCALE BEEHIVE OR FRENCH DRAIN PROTECTION TYPEA OVERLAP GEOTEXT1LE FABRIC 6° AND FASTEN WOOD OR STEEL FENCE POSTS 8' -0' O.C. EXISTING GROUND ENGINEERING FABRIC (MIRAFI ENVIRO -FENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL) WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT (OPT. IF POSTS ARE 4' -0" 0.1.) BACKFILL BURY BOTTOM 6' OF FABRIC CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF. ALL EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS FOLLOWING TURF ESTABLISHMENT COST FOR REMOVAL INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT. HEAVY DUTY EROSION CONTROL SILTFENCE FOR BEEHIVE CATCHBASINS AND AS NOTED ON PLANS • NEW CATCHBASIN PROTECTION Ip.r capon:. esennurrenspluctsumwasomennrotommosvneeunma CO MVO= MOLL MID. MAC Arr.." CUWACTS MPS PIACEUENT. /REVISIONS B\ 3 0 g. 0 >- (Z J J DRAWN BOB 01E0(ED 808 091E 10 -10 -2005 `91109L SCALE HOR!Z. N/A N/A .pe Ho. 05013 6000 PAGE SHEET 01.03 \ ai SHEETS,/ A ' 8• DESIRED MINIMUM A 3.r OUTER LIMITS OF / /// y/k • / , Tr 4.Ox - 2 WALK - CONCRETE WALK -3, e;r ♦♦♦ /,, / y R • • ♦ 4'0" Q CONCRETE �, .♦ ♦♦ , \ / 5 B' RUNT a , E -.. ...L.... 5 8^ 5 O BACK OF CURB i o T 5 8• 1 m 1 a'u 1 I `n La 1 FRONT FACE'. l 11 rl11117: OF CURB '17.11: • m 1 - ' 1 v � 1 �v 1 1 ••- .:IF G. .. S 8' ) t 6,,8t*.y„,.,� ® 6.-5° •'O. 4'2•, ' °•TW I Q (6' C<1R8 6' 3" 16" CURB 1 _I ( 5' 3" -16" CURB i f q,. 4. 0" MIN. ® A' L CURB / VAR. WIDTH CUftO A. Z i0 4,2" (4" CURB 1 4.0" MIN. © 4.2" 14" CURB ) I A.4] A PLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMP PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP SDX - 65X '...-Q-A• OF BASE DIAMETER - CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER • 5.4" 16" CURB 1 X = 4.0" DESIRABLE ° 3.4" 14" CURB 1 7/e -1 T /I6' C0.8T5. - 1.43T5 °1 _ •. -..- ... :.�.. -- '.. DOME SECTION _ ,. OA2 F T./FT. MAX. Q 15/8' -23/8" -...::::t..4.".:.;11: CONCRETE WALK 0.625" - 2.375 "I O 0.08 FTJFT, OR FLATTER 30 SECTION A -A 15/8• -23/8° Q.628 °- 2.375 "1 159375 °1P,7 EOME RYPI i- . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 0000• N oaoa00000• •0000••00• L 15 /16 "CTYP.1 5/8 MIN. 5/6° MIN. IF THE PATH OF TRAVEL 'X 'I5 4 FT.OR GREATER 10.9375 "> 10.625°7 R. ROUND ALL 0.10 TO 0.08 FT./FT. SLOPE FOR THE FLARED SIDE. IF DOME SPACING [SLOPED 'X '15 LESS THAN 4 FT_ THEN THE FLARED SIDE SLOPE INTERSECTIONS. MUST 401 EXCEED 0.08 F1J11.. I6,3" 16" CURB & 0.08 FT. /FT. SLOPE 1 II 4' 0" MIN. © _ G. 3..,. 16" 0058 & 0.08 FTJF T . SLOPE 1 4.2" 4.2" 14" CURB & 0.08 FT. /FT. SLOPE 1 ELEVATION OF RAMP 14" CURB & 0.08 FTJFT. SLOPE 1 NOTES: TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). ALL STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THIS STANDARD PLATE. THE CURB AND CURB TRANSITION ON THE RAMP WILL BE PAID FOR AS LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE CURB OR CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER. THE RAMP AREA WILL BE PAID FOR AS CONCRETE WALK EXCLUDING THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA WHICH WILL BE PAID FOR AS TRUNCATED DOMES BY THE SQUARE FOOT. BIKE TRAILS SHALL HAVE TRUNCATED DOMES ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF TRAIL WHEN THE TRAIL CROSSES A ROAD. DOMES ARE NOT TO BE USED ON SIDEWALKS OR TRAILS WHEN CROSSING ALLEYS OR DRIVEWAYS. 0 1/2 INCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, AASHTO M 213. 0 wHEN POSSIBLE. PROVIDE A -CLEAR PATH OF TRAVEL 4.0" WIDE BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. A RELATIVELY FLAT 4' X 4'1ANDWG WILL ALLOW WHEELCHAIRS TO NAVIGATE AROUND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. NO SIGNALS. SIGNS. CABINETS. OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS ARE 4LL0WE0 IN THE RAMP OR PATH OF TRAVEL O wHEN 4 MEDIAN IS NOT 11100 EN0009 FOR 180 PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND A 48" LANDING BETWEEN THEM. THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE MEDIAN AT STREET LEVEL. 0 PLACE THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS (TRUNCATED DOMES) AT THE BACK OF CURB. WHEN THE DETECTABLE WARNING SYSTEM 10 A PRECAST MATERIAL THE C1XR8 SHALL BE HAND FORMED 70 FILL THE GAP. CI ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE 2'0" MIN. IN DIRECTTDN OF TRAVEL AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH Cr Cr. OR 4' 0" TYPJ OF THE CURB RAMP. THIS 2.0" DY 3'D• OR 4'0" WIDTH (TYP.) TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALK- ING SURFACE. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A LIGHT (GRAY OR BUFF TYPICALLY) COLOR WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A DARK COLOR, THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A DARK COLOR (TED OR DARK GRAY TYPICALLYI WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK I5 A LIGHT GRAY 0181117 COLOR. © 4.0" 814. FOR New CONSTRUCTION. 3' 0° ALLOWED TO STAY IN PLACE FOR RETROFIT PROJECTS. IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE CURB CUT WIDTH EXCEEDS 4.0", THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH. APPROVED FEB. 20. 2004 Vv�i Li_ 01615 005104 ENGINEER STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP FOR THE HANDICAPPED SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2521 2531 STANDARD PLATE 7036F 1 OF 2 AEV5(09 RATE 4 -14 -2004 BEEHIVE OR FRENCH DRAIN PROTECTION TYPEA OVERLAP GEOTEXT1LE FABRIC 6° AND FASTEN WOOD OR STEEL FENCE POSTS 8' -0' O.C. EXISTING GROUND ENGINEERING FABRIC (MIRAFI ENVIRO -FENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL) WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT (OPT. IF POSTS ARE 4' -0" 0.1.) BACKFILL BURY BOTTOM 6' OF FABRIC CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF. ALL EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS FOLLOWING TURF ESTABLISHMENT COST FOR REMOVAL INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT. HEAVY DUTY EROSION CONTROL SILTFENCE FOR BEEHIVE CATCHBASINS AND AS NOTED ON PLANS • NEW CATCHBASIN PROTECTION Ip.r capon:. esennurrenspluctsumwasomennrotommosvneeunma CO MVO= MOLL MID. MAC Arr.." CUWACTS MPS PIACEUENT. /REVISIONS B\ 3 0 g. 0 >- (Z J J DRAWN BOB 01E0(ED 808 091E 10 -10 -2005 `91109L SCALE HOR!Z. N/A N/A .pe Ho. 05013 6000 PAGE SHEET 01.03 \ ai SHEETS,/ 6' u �% L `mod 0°'°°0 NEENAH CASTING 0- 1642 -9 W/ NEOPRENE BOOT, OR EQUAL. LETTERE0 SANITARY 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIDE. BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING & AND MANHOLE FINISH SMOOTH ON THE INSIDE RINGS (MIN. 2. MAX OF 5 RINGS) LINO L MANHOLE -\ SLEEVE SEE DETAIL PLAN - 6 46" SECTION A -A NO WOOD SHALL BE USED FOR ADJUSTING CASTES: CEMENT MORTAR DAY. CA51 IRON MANHOLE FRAME A COVER AS NOTED. MANHOLE 070 5 SHALL 3E CAST RON, ALUMINUM OR STEEL - REINFORCED PLASTIC, PER ASBM 0478. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BANHOS SECTIONS PER ASTM 0470, FURNISHED WITH 0-RING GASKETS AND LUBRICANT EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. A 12" OR 16• BARREL SECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED 011000 THE CONE WHET.DR 40596.E PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLE SHALL BE 0640E MATER TIGHT BY CAST NPUCE RUBBER BOOT AND CEMENT MORTAR INSIDE SURFACE 5HAIL BE FINISHED 5M001H SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE, SILT FENCE DETAIL CATCH BASIN PLAN NEENAH R43067 -0U BOx PM 063 AND CB10 RNA ELLVATO0 AS SHOWN ON PUNS. 10" -00" CASTING SHALL BE BOLTED COVER, AS FINISHED GRADE 1D° WYE 10° PVC SLOPE TO MATCH PLAN 10" THREADED PLUG 4° CONCRETE PAD 10 PVC 10' X 45' BEND n6 J NOTES: - ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SOLVENT WELD EXCEPT AS NOTED. - 10" SUP JOINT PLUG SHALL BE BLOCKED SUFFICIENTLY TO WITHSTAND AIR PRESSURE TESTING. CLEAN OUT 1 1/2" MnDOT LVWC35030B (WEAR COURSE) TACK COAT MnDOT 2357 2" MnDOT LVNW350308 (BASE COURSE) 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE W/ 3" MINIMUM BENEATH PROPOSED CURBS COMPACTED 00000 OE TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION BASE SLAB PLAN EXTERNAL RUBBER SEALING SUAVE AS MANUFACTURED BY INFl -516ELD OR APPROVED 00 R 2 MINAX GS OF (05 IN. RIN. GS) PRECAST RDNF0RCE0 CONCRETE BOX COAT ENOS OF PIPE 41 1E9AR WITH 1000 SCUDS. TWO -PART EPDXY SEALER. SAWCLFff1NG REQUIRED FOR PARTIAL PIPE LENGTHS. SECTIONAL VIEW NO STEPS ALLOWED. MnNVERT FILLET CCYAST 18 RAGE CONCRETE 0" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BASE CATCH BASIN (2'X3' BOX) STRUCTURE DIAMETER 48' 60" 72' 64" 96" 15" 22" 29" 37° 44" 1.09' BACK OF CURB Q04880 RE040FD UNOR RRUP (WAR MO en MALI HNIO- 4.8116PRPP, 1 PO. LOP WRAP =NEE Sv W Fw OMB K tW 10-24 >r W 46 is-I1 IF In .D' 6_6 8 24• t L® 4-6 AWE On DOA APPNNVPWF T.4 Iva CAP. wow in/ 4" CONCRETE, MIX 3A32A- 6" CUSS 5 AGGREGATE BASE SUBGRADE NOTE SIDEWALK TO BE 6" WIDE UNLESS N01ED OTHERWISE TYPICAL SIDEWALK . SECTION CENTER OF STRUCTURE CENTER OF PIPE AND STRUCTURE NEENAH R- 3067 -V CASTING NOTE: STRENGTH DESIGN OF COVER SHALL BE PER MNDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020. RECTANGULAR OPENING CB COVER 1/2" MORTAR ON OUTSIDE BETWEEN RINGS. CASTING 14 CATCH BASIN. FINISH E STR M ON INSIDE NO M01TAR ON WADI. 31000E DIGP1 1106 440 RIR 000005 SAIL NOT 8561 TES MAN "A IHi ESN. RASE RHW ROM SEES MD 11410 TIP E RA40 ENO 5400040 JAR IMAM 6164 FROA 11P OX 00110Y OF PPE TB LAST 3 MINS ON MET NO OUTLET. 6110 ARONOU£.18 LAST 3 SMOG OF WE U.1 TIE DOLT PASIND6 PER PRE SIM LESS 84800 ". USE 5/1" TES 06 PPE STNS 17 110 IF. LI£ 3/4• TES 06 PPE 445 36 16 66. L61.1606 FIEF 00 OW 7E. REMOVE CURB Box BOLTS l )(4' s/6 • 34 PROS 3 AP5AFFSDx WA91 GUARD T1 PEST NOT BP 040461E AFTER EABMCA1O1 FLARED END SECTION DETAIL T RINGS (INN. 2. MAC OF 5 RINGS) T- R- 3067 -V CASING FOR CBM112, 44404, R- 3067 -4 CASTING FOR 08486. 00487. R- 3067 -0 CASTING FOR 064458 8- 1642 -9 CASTING FOR 00665. LETTERED •510831 SEVER' R-4342 CASING FUR 44MH1, CB5, PRECAST COVER SLAB (TYPE 2) 411420 2 818105 011U6VS50 SEAL ON SUB JOINTS. mENT moat NI PRECAST BASE 54'_,➢2' 100 1SIOf4 7141004115 E55 6 120' 12 BE M11 00 WA/EN . 6 SI:0 users No nA IG WIM KM/ OILY. 1.1411.110LE SIVE 5114.1. BE Mt Ink, N.M. OR MEM RENEW. PLATE PS /ILL OPI0m0 BEEXED1 P/PE .1,142.E WALL Cpyarr NNW. CATCH BASIN / MANHOLE # 2 &3 O.D. +2' 0.D. 60MP416 10 BACKFlLL m.y; • COMPACTED SAND OR PIT RUN GRANULAR MATERIAL UGHTLY COMPACTED BACK0LL GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING 0.D/2 0.0 %4 (9" MIN) EARTH FOUNDATION PIPE FOUNDATION DETAILS • ASRJ 02321 EMBEDMENT MATERIAL 'r,; PIPE INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASM D 2321, TABLE 2. • EMBEDMENT MATERIAL 5HA11 CONFORM TO AMU 02321, TABLE 1. GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING METHOD NEM I. IIIEGALI1EZ 19 SE USED Ai AU .111:041.11.E.Y. ANTI 1 PINT, Ed BLOCK 1.1100‘ CALE B AT /EL L EMS MO OS Ig 11 BALKS MEGALUG LOCATION (REVISIONS BY 0 a DRA BO BOB 3 -3 -2005 VERTCI1. C- 440940 N A N A 0. 05513 OO6 PAGE SHEET C1.04 OF SHEETS +41i, tj: ;A OCT I 2005 • • • .2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc Evergreen Tree Detail Tree Detail Shrub Detail ..b.w I,nd erg m.. Plant List CODE ox. ARM 19 ABM 21 IH 20 BOA W NB O6 DB weldM1 P°; ,P,0 / Prime afire SP 13 ScI1ce / PNUa sywlrM COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME ameba g Mope / Amor s freeman) 'Armstrong' Autumn Blaze Mople / Seer • heernan0'4elierm.d Imperil Nonestocu. / 4U.II.10 trlacvnthee 1mpcle' FMigld Ash / Preens Wpm 'Fallgad' »r Birch / B00. Mgr. Valor Nebo Wowing e. / Salle Mai 'Trlete' SSC 04 Spring Snow Crab.p10 / Moles .55 09 Sane' AC 34 SS 24 SOW 24 SCJ 16 0620 Currwt / Bees Oh. 6,.mou d Bekaa / Spbooa nIppon0o '5,404460' Grew 504 Grew i Juniper/ unyeru4 02melc 'Sec Green' Scald. Juniper / Jumps ua wbinv '5can01i 26. BB 2.5. BB 2.5' BB 2.5' BB B' BB Clump flO cant 6' B6 6' BB 1.5' BB JO Cont. {3 Cont. 25 Cont. /5 Cant NOTE WANO1IES ON RAN SUPERSEDE 415T OUAN1111E5 W THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. DECIDUOUS 044A0TORT TOTAL' 00M60504 O2E65111I11 TOTAL 98950101. 1011 TOTAL SHRUB TOTAL: ea D4 e8 SOD AREA 48901 SO. F1. Planting Notes Contractor NN provide one mar guy... of 01 plant marries. TIs [M.P.... 000. 100,0 0, the dal a Lender,. umneere or owner, write. of the .IUM pleellnp.NR.loaemmt sleet motW. Nall alw hove o e mar guorentes commencing upon plenleg. As want. to be .6.624.4 grads. M and /or hardy. 54.rdmm grade st. miler tar. but a rat Ibniled by N following standards. All plNS NMI In Rao from di.ea.e. assts. wounds, scars. All plants NMI 8e free it noliceeee 9ws hales. m tlelarmXles All Plee4 Nall how Pnns, bellny brenm09 one leafing. Canllernue trap WWI haw on eeteb110.0 mMn lender and b Might to width m5a of no lees Won SI Reeta to reykemenmla eat a mer lranrn Sttanra tl 0d •v =eMr e n Nwaery ewes (912 60.1-1890) Plone W be ,moiled me per standard ANS wanting Praellas Use merman 12' loam plontbr4 soil on trees and 6' on slaves (sides and boll= of bole). a3 to be eduWg tee sell from ale free of roots road larger Won ono inch. subsoil ,ions, and merge weeds. Contractor Nall verify bco0wra Wth dl ut0ltles prior to 0a0la.w. of 01an14 Contractor mall contact O0Dher Slate 'one car (651- 454 -0002 or 80D- 232 -1185) to verily 1pcotlone of 0l underground ut0 *De. Blueing of Mee wlbnat: repmlVVn, Plumb oar stake 1! net plumb saor oar tslrp el em0e1M1- barked vow - Metre top and bottom. Remove by April 1. Cam *ova of buries art DB mntoriew remove p n puttee Ponle wilt ee4 nee rt peat pole Brun. m necessary- per standard mnsry mxllw one to arrest pear rmmiy. to PlOnle NMI be en eMiely planted upon cr. at seta Prop., Mel -. malorloly II newoery. telnpaOY only. All Waterbed prom to be settled anew vWNmee sod tab be Wondore M'nwoly grown and array bluegrass mix. ens 4 5 e prepared with of fiend raked to ova 0.bra red ensure drainage. Slop. of 21 or greeter cil es Wee.. mm inches of shredded hordwood barb multi shall he used avund ell trees worm turf woos. AN elwb pionl.g beds (01tbh sodded mine) NMI haw wood bonier fobrIc. A' of shredded M64weod mulch and Vdley -Kew Nook Diamond (or we) ply edging. The mtgh, Nall be rostd wim smo. mows mtl of Mast 3' from ante. of »l * 8. bee . . 41 area and 6*0 0511 far edg,S w sting Paekeng eel Wends to be Wedtled M1atlwam multi. Mulch to molN meting wnabona (seas ADPYC4ble). AI permed. beds and omoman4l gross 0Ws NMI haw weed boiler tope.. 2' el OM1ntlded hordwo60 maim ond Vdie. -0.. Beck Divmon4 (or mum) poly *44015. The edging sher be plead xllh emooN dlaY. 01(0. ode eed elMxelW tor edging mere pogroms. ShndNtl hordwood nyloet 4' dew Nell be proNds0 , ell Wonting beds ddH.a! to ndexalb antl dX»w4H. Mnplanthg MI be W'di 4;1' Prang and can --" 89 been ee peeled h Ne mmediols 600060 Nall 91ov0e 00689044.4409,0 of Plant melmloly pIP the Plant e epy0el�ll �etl ere helB011On eHWn s wemVanM. Owner will eel wevide wooer Prodtle YNgvlbn le ell pimletl arras on vote. Imgatlw 001 b. dpign/bWd by Lantl. E e Ceel�clorN CAlllmformvDon eb06t ,seel.lion end allodu1,9 nee be Rwvlr. rewaes or von /s.tl 40 re06Yed Ior any 0.44.41 806560(64 area veAeorl to Ne nee asWNm mr.g mn.WClbn. Peace all damage 40 property from 0anl,q wer4tivro et no coal to owner. Ho We peel motor.* wWMllul.n..01 be a ed unless a posed M r ties ed of we Nltscl by Ule Landscape Contractor prior b wbmeb.n of N bid ontl /ar quotoDOn. OCT I. C ")fln5 D' 30' 60' BO' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Ankeny Kell Architects 55114 40U 1 hereby certify orreport ws tired by me or der my direct weenie= ond Mot I under day L red a ts00. g MINNESOTA Dole. Rag. N¢ Sheet 1 OF 1 AIMAny Res AINRM5 P.A. 2061 • • • L U la la / 1 Sa L. ' `• 1 L 1 1 L L L 1 1 4 1 1 L L 1 1 L L L k IL III- Y j 4 15 la 4 �+ ;Y 4 4 L f Y .1 \f: L 1 4 L L ik L iIL 11 L Li L {;- •.1i,•Y L h L(� '.1 L li 4 1 L - L Y II L L r L: 4i V 5, jr L L y :b L s1 L L L ,Y /L L 'L L }u eL i 4 L y It 4 L !+ L b lu L Y L Y L IL la lt 4 L L L la L L L la fa 4'L L L L L U L b 4 L L L L 1,'L 1 1 L Y+ L Y L Y Lfe41 L 1 L Y 1 L L L iL 1 la L U L L L l+ 4 1 L 4 ILL li L L L 4 � }41 11 4 4 4 4 U Vwye2 La L L L Sr la L BY1'�r L jL iL 1LIb lt: 1 1 b L L 1 4 L 1 Y 1 4 ( vii rLL ,1a,• L"••Yul. 1 'L L h Y L ',L {L jL: L Y ti >j L L 4L1 L L 1 4 4 4 ;ice 4'1 4 4 A+ +"~L'^ —ti11 ti L 1L L L L L L L 4 4 1 L L L L IL U 1. lP' 1 1 �z 1_ • 1,..--,.... L ,�, L L, Y l ti %� !Ly__k\ _ L„ L.�,L L 4 L L L L L L Ilr L L 14!(y} 1 1.. .---.4‘. L ,• U' °S'L'' L 1 rL 4 -,Sri ,L"L•,• IF,JL L 1 L 1. L U LE L b b L 1 L Lam± ~` L L mil. L U (L 1 L L 1 L L L•L..,1 • I i ji L i i '='L,� L L L s L lk .4'.... .. 4 1 L b '1V.-'10‹:‘,. \ lo L L.,,•L + L x. ay L L la L }+ b b Y y W \L la }! 'L•_,L, b L,•L, L Y :a. li ^_Ti 1 L {4 L' L L' ti ff 4 le L> , L, C., il, ti+ L -'1' - 1 Lla y L L 4 la la L L L L L L L L L 1 L 1L L 4 L I L L L }L i 1p 1'Yw., L L L L 1 L L L 1 L 4 la L L L Y L !L L L L L L L L L I 4 1 la L Y.,Y L la H 1! L L IL jL 14 YI lw li L a [lP 1L L L 1 la L ,•,11~1 1 : L1-D t+ 1 i 1 i i_, 1 1 I i . } M (L 4 1 4 ... 1`Ylti L L tF L !4 IL IY 1Li 1 1F y lr k !+ 141 'L b L ti 1 ___________ J 4 _: u L b L 1 L 1q L L L L 1 Ar - LA_..Iy �.tr..,k S. 1 14 Vi 1 54 4 Li `4 li L s4* 1i % ti ti ti ti lj ti' L Li LI ti L L k b ti L 4 L L 4a. L 4 L L L la la L I. L L L L L L L L•`�ti' +1 L L L L L L 1 LI L', 15 4e 5 tI l4 "u:, 1i i 1( 14 1 1 • 1j 14 >i y ti L1 1 11 is 'th}i Li ) > o f 4 '1„ 4 9 9 u1\ . f 9 •ti ' j L e; L y Li Y 1 V IM is SO u ti v`� 1i ti D,,.ft L L L L Y L Y Y 4 1 u U L5 L L L L 11 L L L 4 L 15 4 1M 14 11 l4 1 L L\ L L U UI e1 L L 15 L L 14 k L L L L; L, y` -.�M\ to I I : Y I : 9 LI 1: Si V y I L li ti L V L lP, 1� \i ;} • I • ; • L' si N 1. L 1 L 1, '4'•- U L •4, L L 1+ 4 L 4 L 4 4 L L 1 1. b L L L L L N 4 14' L ° "L1L L L L L L 1L L la L l4 Y l4 l+ L L 1 U L L L ? L 41 • U �.'L.. L L : 1 1.; >: 1F t L i1 l L l k i Y3 L? L L4,1 S L , L4'.SY 1 L_,q,H )a; 1L 1L !L ! � 4_j.{___I.._.L_..�u.J� �L k • 1; 15 11 1} 4 4 r I1 i L i 4 I la if L L L L I • 4 L•.. { 11 L` 1i ti t L Its 1L 14 E LI L fi Le L 1 1 L L L L la 4 L L 1. L L L L L L L L L L 4 4 L la L 1. L 4 4 b L 4 L L 4 L 4 1 L L L l+ 1+ L L L le 4 L ti li} u tii Lumbwire Schedule Project: All Projects Symbol 0ty Lobel Arrangement Lumens LLF Description AA CI 4 LS100897 SINGLE 40000 0.800 CTM -FT- 400- SMH -F -HSS BB 19Ia BACK -BACK 40000 0.800 CTM -A- 400- SMH -F- double DD 7 SPIGR5 SINGLE 5500 0.800 SP1 *NG G85 Numeric Summary Protect: All Pro Jects Label CalcPts CalcType Illuminance Units Avg Mal Fc 1.53 7.9 Min 0.1 Avg /Min 053 Max /Min 79 "ms l tCunel P5$,MWML. lire laka. Mn:bPE101.0WG, 1090t2005 1 2 4:58 PL SITE PLAN SCALE: I'= 30' -0' Project YMCA LINO LAKES LINO LAKES MINNESOTA PARSONS 5960 IAN ai Mr PLVMDPO1rS MINNESOTA 55432 _71 /511 -8000 5/511 -]210 WNW.PARSOMSCOPP.COM MwrmeW M MPwe Pwr o.eYh y aansa r Me men.. a=a b rev.. amm UGr eYa Project Information • SITE PLAN LIGHTING & POWER Sheet Number E101 • • Chain of Lakes YMCA Fu tateluIn Chain of Lakes YMCA YMCA of Greater St. Paul 2125 East Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55413 -2720 Ankeny Keti Architects 821 Raymond Ave., Suke 400 SL Paul, MN 55114 Chain of Lakes YMCA Parking Summary Phase I 176 spaces Phase 11 263 spaces PARKING SUMMARY By Function (Assumes maximum occupancy of {wilding) Spaces Gymnasium -1 occupant/1 car Natatorium - 2.5 occupants/1 car Fitness Center -1 occupanVlcar Aerobics - 1.5 occupants /1 car Multipurpose - 2 occupants/1 car Teen /Senior Center - 2 occupants /1 car Staff - 1 occupantll car 20 (full capacity) 60 (full capacity) 80 (100sf /person) 20 (30 people /class) 15 (30 people) 15 (30 people) 20 Total 210 By Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide Section 3.5 Table 4 Health Club -4 spaces/1,000 sf Office - 3 spaces /1,000 sf 107 3 Total 110 • PRECAST PANELS ❑ ❑ ❑ PRECAST PANELS METAL PANEL METAL CANOPY METAL PANEL T.O. PREC6• AST EL 131• - TL . 1215 -E7RY ,l T.O. BRICK VENEE EL. 116' -6" R A T.O. METAL p EL 113 -6" PANEL �" T.O. CANOPY EL 110' -6' T.O. PRECAST Pi 131' -6" T.O. CLERESTORY EL 125. -6" I' T.O. BRICK VENEER EL 116' -6" T,0. METAL PANEL EL 113' -6 4 /, T.O. CANOPY EL 110' -6" ET.O. FlN. FlR. L 100 -0 Nort -h Elevation PRECAST PANELS EL 100 -0 South Elevation PRECAST PANELS PRECAST PANELS PRECAST PANELS PR If 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ EL. 131' -6' If 125 ESTORY $ N `r &T T- *22 .1 CLERESTORY M.� �111.1111.1111111111.1 - ���u�.` 0TL T-A6' AN - - -- Y.' iBRCK TL O PANEL 4 - 111=11111111111 Man.= 1M3 113-A6L , T.e. FlN. , ■ - -_ T.O. PRECAST El.. 131 -6" iIO. PLR. EL 100 -0 METAL PANEL West Elevation BRICK VENEER PRECAST PANELS METAL PANEL BRICK VENEER OCT 1 C 2005 J East Elevation • • *T.O. PR0CA5T EL 131 -6' T.O. CLERESTORY E1.. 125' -6' 0 L0. 60101< ' VENEER R EL 116 " -6 10. MEL' EL 113' -6" TA PANEL T.O. CANOPY EL 110 -6" PRECAST PANELS North Elevation METAL CANOPY METAL PAN BRICK VENEER PRECAST PANELS _— PRECAST PANELS METAL CANOPY METAL PANEL ELT.O. PRAST 131 " EC-6' T.O. CLERESTORY ,L EL. • 125' —B' T.O. 061CK VENEEP EL 116' -6" l' TO. METAII 00N0L �L EL 110 -6' T.O CANOPY A EL 110' -6" Y T.0- FIN. FIR. EL 100 -0 South Elevation PRECAST PANELS PRECAST PANELS 1.0. PRECAST ,L 0TE10. TORY ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ EL 131' -6' TO CLERESTORY A .L If 125' -B" V T.O. BRICK VENEER 4, YY 120-8 AB.O..CLERESTORY Eh, �.. EL 116 -6' Y 7.0. METAL PANEL `DEL 11 ]' -0' T.0 METAL PANEL - �- EL 113' -6" V — -- _- _ _ t e — � • �; • — — rts` 1 T0. EL. 13PREC1' -6' AST METAL PANEL West Elevation 1 PRECAST PANELS PRECAST PANELS METAL PANEL BRICK VENEER PRECAST PANELS OCT 1 0 2005 East Elevation ❑ A �' • • rr v. MECHANICAL nATATORIUM MECHANICAL rnnomema m••Ilia RiIR�IR :C JAN. IM a.. OA WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM ■ — .. — . .. MI MN MI MI icon bi, mi G .I No um mi • 1 NATATORIUM STORAGE 1 1 nnnnnnnn k flor lim � U MEN'S LOCKER ROOM 1 G/ Mil M . .. .. i G r4r4 �F MI A — mmomm . .. .. . p _ GG GG _ M CA i MI . .. . inns llinansinnod - - -- - --- --- --r1 L - -- . - --11 r -�fiJ 1 L 1 1 1 J UFE GUARD Mama 1 LOBBY • • • ♦• •w •• • • • • • • • NATATORIUM INTERVIEW ROOM Le SEEN/SENIOR ROOM 111 • f r OCT 102005 SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY FIRST FLOOR Natatorium 5,000sf Gymnasium 4,168sf Men's Locker Room 1,282sf Women's Locker Room 1,414sf Family Locker Room 849sf Lifeguard Room 134sf Sound 79sf Multipurpose Room 1,627sf Teen /Senior Center 1,583sf Kitchen 12Bsf Childcare 1,590sf Administration 2,148sf Front Desk 265sf Interview Room 136sf Lobby /Seating /Vending 2,122sf Public Toilets 483sf Mechonicol /Storoge /Janitor 3,174 SECOND FLOOR Fitness 5,668sf Aerobics 1,810sf Storage 433sf GROSS SF 39,252sf • • AEROBICS STUDIO FIINESS STORAGE IT4 11111111111 g , OPEN 70 LOBBY BELOW ROOF BELOW ROOF BELOW OCT 1 21,105 ?if • .:---177:= . • 7 ? 4 allai 4 slIMIN OCT 1 0 2005 7 7 Lko, I - 0 A ■ftili LOP t Z t- " Y 17- L I N OCT 2, .°T) 200_,5 • AGENDA ITEM V.C. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: November 9, 2005 TOPIC: PUD Amendment — Signage Criteria Hartford Development, Inc. BACKGROUND City staff is working with the developer to come up with acceptable signage criteria for the Legacy at Wood's Edge project. We had intended on presenting a draft at this meeting, however it has proven to be more difficult and time consuming than originally anticipated. At this time a draft is not ready for review by the Planning and Zoning Board. Staff is recommending that the Public Hearing be continued to the December 14, 2005 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. OPTIONS. 1. Continue the public hearing to the December 14, 2005 regular meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends continuing the public hearing.