Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/10/2006 P&Z Packet• CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Swearing in of reappointed members II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 12, 2006 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. Elect Chair and Vice -Chair B. Final Plat for Pine Glen, 7930 Lake Drive — Paul Bengtson C. Planned Unit Development Final Plan, Legacy Townhomes — Paul Bengtson D. PUBLIC HEARING for Rezone to Planned Unit Development and Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat for a 31 lot residential conservation development located to the south of Kildeer Drive and Pheasant Run and southwest of Birch Park, The Preserve — Jeff Smyser VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Rules of Conduct — Jeff Smyser B. Joint Meeting — Nature's Preserve, May 31, 2006 at 6:30 p.m. — Jeff Smyser VII. ADJOURN • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT . STAFF PRESENT . April 12, 2006 6:34 P.M. 9:28 P.M. Michael Hyden, Perry Laden, Robert Nelson (arrived at 6:38 p.m.), Brian Pogalz, Rob Rafferty, Michael Root and Paul Tralle. None. Paul Bengtson, Jeff Smyser and Michael Grochala I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Rafferty called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:34 p.m., April 12, 2006. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. Mr. Tralle asked to add Item 6C, Rehbein Bus Barn. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 8, 2006 Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to approve the March 8, 2006 Minutes as presented and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Rafferty declared Open Mike at 6:35 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:35 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2006 Page 2 A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a commercial dog kennel at 7933 -24th Avenue Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval subject to the five conditions listed in the staff report. Chair Rafferty declared the continued Public Hearing open at 6:38 p.m. Board members expressed concern for current unsanitary conditions of the site along with runs that do not meet standards. Board members agreed that at this time, the site is not compliant with the regulations for a kennel license. City Staff reminded the board that they are voting on a conditional use permit for the property, not a kennel license. Mr. Bengtson reported that the police department will inspect the site for compliance with the ordinance in regards to a kennel license. Mr. Bengtson confirmed that the city could revoke the conditional use permit if a violation of Section 502 of the City Code occurs. Board members were concerned with the issuance of a commercial use versus a private use, noting that a commercial use is intended for the sale of dogs. Mr. Bengtson noted that the standards for a private or commercial kennel are the same, but a maximum of four dogs are allowed with a private kennel. Board members agreed that the animal ordinance should be revised, stating that it lacks standards that should be in place for the protection of dogs. Mr. Bengtson clarified that the applicant has submitted a separate application for a commercial kennel license and that the Police Department would have to inspect the site for licensing. Mr. Rafferty invited the public to speak. No one was present to speak on the subject. The applicant was not present. Mr. Tralle made a motion to close the Public Hearing at 7:13 p.m. and was supported by Nelson. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Rafferty pointed out a discrepancy regarding the number of allowable dogs referred to in the applicant's letter. Mr. Bengtson stated that he could clarify the number being requested with the applicant. He added that he understands the applicant is trying to comply in order to keep all of her dogs, and a private kennel allows a maximum of four dogs. Mr. Bengtson stated that according to the applicant, the sixth dog mentioned in the letter belonged to a relative. • Mr. Pogalz pointed out that a commercial kennel would allow for a dog to have puppies, but they must be gone by six months of age. DRAFT MINUTES • Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2006 Page 3 Mr. Nelson was concerned that the applicant states that most of the time, the dogs are kept with her in the house. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a commercial dog kennel at 7933 — 24th Ave, including the five conditions listed in the staff report. Motion was supported by Mr. Tralle. The Board agreed to amend the motion to include a sixth condition, requiring city staff to review the property prior to the issuance of a license. Mr. Pogalz made a motion to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a commercial dog kennel at 7933 — 24th Ave, including the five conditions listed in the staff report and a sixth condition by the board. Motion was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. B. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Rezone, Preliminary Plat and MUSA Allocation for Pheasant Stroll Estates Mr. Smyser presented the staff report. Chair Rafferty declared the continued Public Hearing open at 7:32 p.m.. Mr. Smyser announced that City Staff received a request from the applicant to extend the review period an additional 60 days. Mr. Smyser stated that city staff was currently not prepared to recommend approval, and is therefore recommending this item be continued to the June meeting. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to continue the approval of the Rezone, Preliminary Plat and MUSA Allocation for Pheasant Stroll Estates to the June P &Z Meeting. Motion was supported by Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 - 0. C. PUBLIC HEARING to Amend the Planned Unit Development Conditional Use Permit to allow for building height in excess of the district standards and revisions to the site layout, Apollo Landing Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. Mr. Rafferty declared the continued Public Hearing open at 7:35 p.m. Staff recommended approval of the request with three conditions listed in the staff report. Philip Carlson; Equinox Development, applicant, stated that the request for a height increase is to allow for an architectural feature of a Hampton Inn Suite, and that the mechanical area will be screened from view. Mr. Pogalz agreed that it would be good to screen the mechanical area. DRAFT MINUTES • • Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2006 Page 4 Mr. Carlson stated there is an elevator located in the rear of the bldg, but it does not access the roof, therefore the overrun will be below the maximum height. He clarified that the parapet is proposed only on the front of the building. Mr. Rafferty asked why the parapet would not be included in the back of the building as well. Mr. Carlson replied that it would not be visible to anyone from the rear of the bldg. Mr. Bengtson clarified that the intent of the increased front building height is for visual appeal, and that it should be high enough to screen the mechanicals. Mr. Bengtson explained that the site plan has been revised to allow for additional parking spaces for future additions. He noted that the entire site will consist of shared parking. The applicant confirmed that each future phase will be brought back for site approval. He stated that they would have liked all of the buildings on the site to be built at the same time. He added that the hotel is now a Hampton Inn Suites, which is better than previously proposed. Brad Michel, 504 — 77th Street, expressed concern about the building height. He clarified that his property is located to the north of the hotel, and the hotel will directly affect the view from the back of his home. He explained that he was present at the meeting to get more information for himself and his neighbors. He continued that initially the developer stated that the hotel height would be within city ordinances, and now that has changed. He preferred that the hotel would remain three stories. Mr. Michel stated that the height is less of a concern now that he attended the meeting and received clarification on the project. Mr. Pogalz made a motion to close the Public Hearing at 8:00 p.m. and was supported Mr. Tralle. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Pogalz asked if the fire department was aware of the increased height request. Staff replied that they receive all applications, and that staff had not received any negative comments from them. Rafferty stated that he likes the idea of the mechanical systems being screened, and that he is not opposed to adding the decorative element across the entire length of the roof. Mr. Pogalz asked the developer if the building would now consist of a pre -cast system instead of wood. The developer replied yes. Mr. Nelson made a MOTION to recommend approval of an Amendment to the existing Conditional Use Permit for the Planned Unit Development. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 - 0. D. Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Legacy Townhomes Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2006 Page 5 Staff recommended continuing this item to the next meeting in order to include engineering comments, a final plat and revisions to address architectural comments. Frank Janes, Hartford Group, applicant, stated that they had received the memo from staff with comments and suggestions from the review committee. He expressed that they could address some of the issues, but had concerns with some. He noted that they have been working with staff for a long time revising the plans to achieve a plan that works for the developer, staff and the city. He stated that they are attempting to accomplish a townhome with appealing architecture that works on the site. Mr. Janes addressed each comment in order of staff's letter. 1. The applicant felt they have met the required 15 foot setback from the Right -of -Way. He added that they may adjust these setbacks. 2. The applicant felt they have met the design standards for materials, adding that additional brick or stone is not high on their list. 3. Shawn Knoth, Hartford Group, described the details of the building sides, noting that they can address the issue of increasing the building depth. Mr. Janes noted that they could revise these plans before the next meeting in an attempt to enhance the side view, without affecting cost and marketability. 4. The applicant felt that in working with staff, they have met the guidelines and did not feel that bay windows were necessary. Their proposal included distinct detailed differentiations, but they added that they could perhaps add some bay windows. 5. The applicant stated that they believe the proposed variation of roof heights adds to the distinction of the units and is an enhancement. 6. The applicant explained that the color rendering submitted is a representation of the color scheme. They welcomed suggestions from the board, and showed true samples of color and materials. Mr. Pogalz commented that increasing the bumpout on the building does increase material cost, but pushing the end walls out is not increasing it that much. Mr. Knoth responded that an eight inch bumpout on the end wall could be attainable. Mr. Knoth stated that they have tried to accommodate staff's comments and thinks they are proposing a great product. Board members expressed concern for the lack of gutters, potentially causing accumulated water on the patios and moisture in windows. They felt that bay windows and extra stone would be nice features. DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2006 Page 6 Mr. Knoth replied they are not proposing gutters as the lowest windows are eight inches off the ground. He added that with the location of roof overhangs and the amount of landscaping, the significant amount of runoff will be in landscaped areas. Mr. Tralle commented that he likes the differentiation of lines on the proposed roofs. Mr. Knoth explained that there are two combinations of the building designs. They will be placed so that no facade will be exactly the same as the one exactly opposite across the street. He described that they will have the same architectural styles, but in a different combination of units and colors. Mr. Janes noted that they will mix up colors to the greatest extent possible. Mr. Knoth added that the colors will stay within a five color palette. Mr. Tralle was pleased that the development will look like a neighborhood. He liked the use of color change. He agreed with bumping out sidewalls and windows. He was concerned about gutters. He complimented the applicant on making great strides. Mr. Knoth described that the door surrounds and stoops will be made of precast stone. Mr. Laden suggested that the building differentiation might be stronger if the pitch was the same but the roof height was varied. He agreed with the recommendation for bay windows, pointing out that the guidelines specifically call for a porch, bay window or balcony. He suggested the bays be boxed out as part of the building front only, so the front facade has depth. As for the side gable, he would rather see a bay than a gable. He suggested if there is a bay on the front, maybe one should be on the side as well. Mr. Pogalz questioned what type of concrete would be used on the patios and sidewalks. Mr. Janes replied that they can clarify that at the next meeting. Mr. Janes assured the board that they will consider the comments made and incorporate what they can from their perspective, and bring them to the next meeting. Mr. Rafferty asked if they have done a similar project anywhere else. Mr. Janes replied no they had not. The applicant asked the board for comments on the colors, noting they are willing to work with staff on specific colors. The board agreed that they liked the selected color scheme and appreciated seeing the samples, concluding that the applicants did a good job. Mr. Pogalz asked the applicant if there has been much public interest in the project so far. Mr. Janes remarked that they have received some interest. Mr. Pogalz asked for an approximate price point for the townhomes. Mr. Janes replied these will not be entry level first -time homebuyer units. Mr. Pogalz asked if Hartford will be doing the construction. Mr. Janes replied that they received bids from a number of contractors and will be making a decision in the next 30- DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2006 Page 7 60 days, noting that the same contractor should construct all of the units. Mr. Janes added that Hartford will provide quality control from architectural standpoint. Mr. Janes went on to say that Hartford Group will still own the property and sell the units for build. Hartford will be inspecting the product and it will be in their best interest to make sure what is built is what is on paper, hoping for best project Lino Lakes has ever seen. Hartford Group will monitor the project. Mr. Rafferty agreed with the importance of checks and balances on a project. Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to table the Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Legacy Townhomes. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 6 — 0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. GTS Training Staff reminded the board to contact Dawn Bugge if they are interested in registering for a training session. Staff confirmed that the registration cost would be paid for by the city prior to the event. B. Hardwood Creek Mr. Smyser summarized that there was a joint meeting of the city council and all of the advisory boards to discuss the Hardwood Creek project. Mr. Smyser asked if the board members had further comments or if those who had not attended the meeting had any questions. Mr. Rafferty commended the master planning of the project. He commented on the importance of park land. He expressed appreciation for the opportunity to have the joint meeting. Mr. Tralle stated that he had attended the open house, and was impressed with the proposed underground watering system. Mr. Root agreed that large scale planning is best for all situations. His only concern was the positioning of big box stores and the transition between commercial and residential uses. Mr. Laden agreed with Mr. Root's comments. He expressed the project brings innovative ideas, except in the commercial area. He would like to see something different in the commercial area. Staff commented that the amount of parkland is an important part of the design. Mr. Smyser noted that the ECS system is being determined to see if it would work on this site, and probably only in commercial areas. The city is looking for more ecologically friendly water management. Mr. Smyser stated that the commercial areas are still being determined and will remain on hold until the road access issue is set. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board April 12, 2006 Page 8 • Mr. Smyser noted that the project design will be determined to some extent by the 35 -E interchange area design. Mr. Laden wondered how valuable the AUAR was with this project. Mr. Smyser replied that the AUAR results were wonderful. He added that anything built must be consistent with the mitigation plan, and that some strong recommendations will be made, along with some suggestions. C. Rehbein Bus Barn Mr. Tralle was concerned that the Rehbein bus site was in violation of their Conditional Use Permit. He recently drove by the site and there appeared to be no activity. He requested that the City Council be informed that they are not in compliance as their partial addition has not been completed and the lighting concerns have not been addressed, as lights currently shine into neighborhoods. Mr. Nelson stated that they have fixed the lights. Mr. Bengtson stated that there was a major delay in the project over the winter. However, he had recently received a phone message from Rehbein that they intend to follow through with the project. They have revised their lighting without approval, so staff will be bringing as -built plans to the city council. He added that they need to connect to city water. He reported that progress is being made. Staff has made a visit to the site and noted that lighting was improved. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Tralle made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:28 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant • DRAFT MINUTES • AGENDA ITEM V.B. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: May 10, 2006 TOPIC: Final Plat Pine Glen BACKGROUND 23 L.L.C. has requested approval of a residential development called Pine Glen. The plat includes 35 residential lots, 2 commercial lots, and five outlots. The subject property is located east of Lake Drive approximately 650 feet south of Main Street. The final plat generally conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on November 28, 2005. However, the phasing that was previously approved is being requested to change. Instead of completing the western portion of the site the first year and then following up with the eastern portion in 2007, the applicant is proposing to switch them. This proposal will have the following effect: This type of adjustment does not require any sort of action beyond approving this final plat and thus approving the phasing plan adjustment. The title commitments have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review and have been determined to be acceptable. Many of the conditions of approval will be addressed as part of the development agreement, but some must be addressed by this plat. Because no homeowner's association will be established, the submittal of documents is no longer applicable in this case. All existing structures have been removed; Lake Drive right of way is dedicated appropriately; a separate 15 foot wide trail easement has been submitted; and a quit claim deed for Outlot E will be required prior to construction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Pine Glen. ATTACHMENTS 1. Final Plat submitted April 25, 2006. MUSA Acres Lots Phase I Phase II Phase I Phase II Approved (Preliminary Plat) 20.5 19.8 40 32 Proposed (Final Plat) 20.5 19.6 35 37 This type of adjustment does not require any sort of action beyond approving this final plat and thus approving the phasing plan adjustment. The title commitments have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review and have been determined to be acceptable. Many of the conditions of approval will be addressed as part of the development agreement, but some must be addressed by this plat. Because no homeowner's association will be established, the submittal of documents is no longer applicable in this case. All existing structures have been removed; Lake Drive right of way is dedicated appropriately; a separate 15 foot wide trail easement has been submitted; and a quit claim deed for Outlot E will be required prior to construction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Pine Glen. ATTACHMENTS 1. Final Plat submitted April 25, 2006. • Et PINE GLEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, 23, LLC., a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner and Landmark Community Bank, NA, a National Banking Association, motgagee of the following described properly situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part of Lots 5 and 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 100, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the following described line: Commencing of the most Northerly corner of said Lot 5, thence Southerly on the East line of said Lot 5, 88.62 feet, to the point of beginning, thence Westerly, at right angles, 45.34 feet, more or less, to the Northwesterly line of said Lot 5 (being the Southeasterly Right of Way line of Highway 8) and there terminating, and also lying Northerly of a line drawn from the Southeast corner said Lot 6, at an angle of 64 degrees, 19 minutes, 30 seconds, measured from North to West, to the Westerly line of said Lot 6, and there terminating. Excepting therefrom, and all above, all part lying within plat of Anoka County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 17, Anoka County, Minnesota. And That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly and Southerly of the North 135 feet of the West 328.50 feet and Easterly of the Easterly line of Anoka County Highway Right —Of —Way Plat No. 17, according to the U.S. Government Survey, Anoka County, Minnesota. And The South Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. And The South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. And The South Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except the Easterly 730.00 feet thereof. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as PINE GLEN and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the avenues and courts and the easements for drainage and utility purposes. In witness whereof said 23, LLC., a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 200 By: , Anthony J. Emmerich, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 , by Anthony J. Emmerich, Chief Manager of 23, LLC., a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota. My Commission Expires MIDWEST Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 9, T31, R22. In witness whereof said Landmark Community Bonk, N.A., a national Banking Association has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 200 LANDMARK COMMUNITY BANK, N.A By Executive Vice President Kevin .1. Whelan STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 by Kevin J. Whelan as Executive Vice President of Landmark Community Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association, on behalf of the association. Notary Public County, Minnesota. My Commission Expires I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as PINE GLEN; that this plat is a correct representation of the survey; that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed In the ground as shown or will be placed as required by the local governmental unit; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no wetlands as defined in MS 505.02, Subd. 1: or public highway to be designated on said plat other than as shown. Blake L. Rivard, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19421 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 200 by Blake L. Rivard, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License Number 19421. Notary Public, County, Minnesota. My Commission Expires The foregoing plat of PINE GLEN was approved and accepted by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 200 If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, os provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA By: , Mayor By: , Clerk Checked and approved this day of By: , Anoka County Surveyor , 200 Quo w 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 200 0 100 200 400 SCALE IN FEET 1 inch = 200 feet N00'40:78`E ''NW Corner Sec.9 -T31N -R22W / Anoka County Cost Iron Monument / $1' NOp *o;,e 89 °32'09 "W �s' �; 314.85 =ivc, N89 °19 22 "W W 35.02 co N8978'49 "W 2631.60 TREE T PINE GLEN J ut N00 °40'38'E r S89 °32'097 1334.52 ' -North Line S1/2 NWI /4 -NWI /4 Sec.9 -T31N -R22W 1 2306.44 '- -North Line S1/2 - -' ,.f o NE1/4 -NWI /4 W N I Sec.9 -T31N -R22W � <- \C KELLY w Noo 3 ° x-67 0 most comer /J ^ a �I a �N T-t� \'' y - '+d y ,i a \ I / F / k. Co Lot 5, Auditor's' I aU q y�� �i/ z� --` - Subd -No. 4eo. / W n 21n I r \ Z \ ( \ \I V } 3 J 'YB9 ( ' !'N T U W 2 In i \ \ / d ___W t Li S1 /� < I \.. N I F I ',-=: p `'l�Op'9�S•\ I :: -I 1/ ter, \'G V 1 ' &ec 9-T31N -R22W SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS \`N - J F L , %. ! I SEE y5HEFET 4 OF 4 SHEETS Auditor's Subd. East Lot 5 dr 6,_. .__ I ti I yj 1 86.16 J KELLY / '- -t- r,3 Rural Cooperative Power o u `‘ o� Rural Cooperative Power Association Lot 6, Auditor's W 2 rn 7373 South Line Subd. No. 100. ,.,-Association Easement t` 4rPer Doc. No. 320796. - - --'� ^`r _• Easement Per Doc. No. 320796. 1 -NEI 4 -NIN 4 _ _ _ _S`+ _ -� `- Sec.9 -TJ1N /R22W 2 1569.61 -,-Drainage and Utility Easement - Z - - -'x' ca , 8 ' 1 o n 1068.68 ' , 971.92 -N1/4 Corner Sec.9 -T31N -R22W Anoka County Cost Iron Monument S8978'48 -E 586.53 6419'30' -- Southeast comer - - -7 7 -South Line N89 °35'30 "W NWI /4 -NW1 /4 Sec.9 -T31N -R22W LAKE 2638.29 MIDWEST Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. - - -- SEE DETAIL A -, S89 °32'08'E b W 70 1 2 S19 2 I "589'35'28T 4 It 275.87 / DETAIL A SCALE: 1 Inch = 30 Feet r- 31 49 North Line S1/2 -, NW1 /4 -NE1 /4 Sec.9- TJ1N -R22W W E 1 L A N � O U T L O T CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 9, T31, R22. 1901.33 2632.02 /t - U NE Comer Sec.9- 731N -6221V Anoka County Cost Iron Monument No monument set-" `- North Line S1/2 (Falls in wetland) NE1/4 -NE1 /4 Sec.9 -T319 -622W Drainage and Utility Easement overall of Outlot E `F . 2 I v- South Line South Line Rural Cooperative Power Association NEI /4 -NE1 /4 NW1 /4 -NE1 /4 ..- Easement Per Doc. No. 320796. - -Sec.9 -T3IN -R22W (Foils in -Sec.9 -T3IN -R22W 4'1 1 No monument SCI o ` - - N89 °35 '28"W 58935 28"E 294.76 -- h Rural Cooperative Power Association Easement Per Doc. No. 320796. - - -, OUTLOT E r Drainage and Utility ,I Easement r / 1624.77 -+ \ -- 1900.64 -- N89 °35'28 "W 1 1624.77 1900.64 h of W h 7 0.po Z.- 2 3893208" E 730.00 --I- T:, tO 0 NOTES: . FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER OF SEC.9 -T31N -R22W IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF NB9'3530 "W. O - DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET, MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "RCS 19421" • - DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND • - DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I 5 '`5 10, 1 1 r10 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT UNES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING REAR LOT LINES AND ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PUT. / • . / 328.50 / Qr / / y� W e'�A / ¢1 4 / S89 °32'09'E e'O , �s -�Nly most corner / Lot 5, Auditor's Sub. No. 100. NO0 4 E - 886 ?�" --� = l46.30(Meas.)) 1 ot� Z� /ir / 5 /S89 °19'22' Ex /. / 35.02- �l (45 / 6rji`o G04' 'O 6.9.533,:i 53'E /`:j •tu0h 0��',%'`10 �r'8 (T'83E8.19 i �P �P /� ._ 33'S ,'g� - T o '1 00 •J 4g J e i / 4:• OCDPOD _./ °j 7 ?38j 41 34 c` ,:::,/ 0 _ �' Ct 248.19 i .6' .° c'3 �w e ., y / %°,s. • ry .e0. ��� / s� 1 PINE GLEN INSET A .4 �O . 5i 314.85 90 ��o ► WniH 1 6E 1 "tN $e 8' N Icy' SS'ho 6 \}a /1.4234 29' '' 1 147.39 79.25 T KELLY of e�4z 5`iz _- 58928'49'E • 197.99 R•'5. 38'51 1 e4?•4a2' e 197.99 15 . d- 0 -4 -West Line S1/2 12K926 1'i 45 NWI /4 -NW1 /4 ,,' / m a Sec.9 -T31N -9224 - ' ? ` r, � & ry / ?s/ ', 1 East Lot 5 & 6, :°. /:y - 1, 4, _ _ _ _ I Auditor's Subd. No. 100 Aso„ W /i '/) 470 I a7;� 1 v 6 0 .o �B 647930.. Southeast comer Lot 6, § W / :,V i '' ' . '?BSe7 h -' --Auditor's Sub. No. 100. 5'i.E N�s ?," 45 h / / /Q' 1 •. .1478 53918 4+� f - .7 -, `��.,Z3 ,\ ?3 \' , 1 //K ` tl , 58932'52 f 137.55 �/ i 0 \ r p�---- ---- - >-- Orain•g• and Utdity Easement �� - L • • kti • k5•k1 • / E=i? 4o MIDWEST 256'51 448.77-- i '-North Line S1/2 NWI /4 -NWI /4 Sec.9- 7.31N-822W D�25k' 23404_ 519 R12.52 ,7. 211.51 }29 1 • 58928'49"E ISOO� gVI I. \ \95 15) v S5•J JJN, ? %/rainagoe I" ^d Malty / I 5847/'4 EaSemen� g 80 _ ?� I l I 2 I ' I f \° I) sp.-Drainage and Utility 4.75.00 Easement ,�', 5893530E L1g a \\ 078935'30'E 135.00 -Rural Cooperative/ Power Association \\ Easement - - - - -' South Line -, ci Per j Doc. No. 720796. \ - Sec.9- NWI /4 p !� 328.50 -0 304.15 / Sec.9 -T31N -R22W 'n 0.0030.OD ,. , ,- • . N89 °35'30 "W o OUTLOT A S89•32'09'E 50031 tt s�G•s �� 4e 58932.09E 180.11 356.95 Ica 4.60:3. 58928'49E AVENUE 21 /1 72.50 -'j'- 284.45 - i --034 t. i� ^i •?..75� i 42.50 JO 30 254.45 1 h ' w ' 6.60- 36� '" &d al n fit? °' R \a• :t 120 WI Pt NI 1:4-: .1 I 21 ?o1.n rI i:Nm JO 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 6a 0 40 60 160 SCALE IN FEET 1 inch = 80 feet 2306.44 --- CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 9, T31, R22. 1334.52 ' � � - � � = � " D in age -seO36�E and Utility 1rea1�':� • .r ?71t)E � ' , ' ?Ls� I o 5i VI ! h ,F 4p5y119?j4_•L \�Al 41-- By 0 UTLOT y �� Likti� C -. £ S4a.06' ' rn C 5893530E 195.00 g ` -Rural N 2 N007177 E �l_00.0QL • • SOS" 4744 ?� \80 207.99 \ North Line \-- NE1 /4 -NWI /4 Easement Sec.9 -T31N -R22W 1 r c 18/ 3 1144' Sb9 :9 58773.31 "W 167.85 295.98 00 N89'49.2519 ut 35.00;: , �b 1 178.04 0 _` i�_ - 380.12 - +,onk�09�T 114.13 9 F 58935'30.E -- 796.13 --•-• 6w' 21 KELLY AVENUE ti 1. '' ,i^ N89 35'30'4 291.20 P.'' 0 U T L 0 T D Cooperative Power Association And Drainage and Easement Per Doc. No. 32 . -- South Line `\ -- NE1 /4 -NWI /4 Utility Easement E \, /r Sec.9- 721N-822W 876.95 f 2638.29 -- Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. NOTES: FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER OF SEC.9 -T3IN -1122W IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N89'35'30•W. 0 - DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET, MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED 'RLS 19421" • - DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND SUNSET -- S89 °32'09'E 265.75 -zDrainage ,E and Utility o 112 Afi 6 N8215.507 _919'E North Line -- NE1 /4 -NW1 /4 Sec.9 -TJIN -R22W ESTA TES 2306.44 '9 ° y5 y Easement - -1, =- S 6 0 S69 y \ >� ��Dqq Q4 . \Wa., CVJ p. \ ' A/2935'051-,-/-:: \ 0 /p 19. � \ j 4 /h �fJ� ,o $' / ` al�.s 3� - �a ?B \ \ l 5 _„°I 101 d': '4''s• \ \ 307'48 / / = \ f N 1 ``tv 79`° \, \D�r•1�.5L41 /IQS'6. 1 1� I. e °.'. 0` �0.. ` ,r. 39 " 1 1 H I 3 ,c1V ° 295._e S�f. " °s Sry / q \ • 9 1#, .. / N / r i ',KS. Cpl ( 4 ' CP/ PINE GLEN INSET B 1208.7J b i Z 12 r, • J0.0030. fl° rr z23 250 Lp3Q8 A 0 O • --JANE AVENUE S89 °32'08'E North Line -- NWI /4 -NE1 /4 ( Sec.9- T31N -922W 1901.33 -- 319.10 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 9, T31, R22. 58932'09 °E "ti 110.94 N89,4395 ;:2059_07101_01 N8:1E0:0'2 5'W '�"0 ,ti o � 0 p J 4 1, r�,L O 4a h I I �SOIf t= u\ 0�� 00 0. /3 04, 210s bPv 8 • 1g I O p 1 0 V 0.00 N1 C33 °' y K. `^I 1 Rot ml Cs� c i'w 11 1 749 L- 20.12D_� L_- 11_QQ_ -1 3 i. - A- 0 0 30 30 616 t' ►309 n 2 - -- 380.12 tt� g 79p6. iJ _26 - N89'35 30 -W ` ti K E L L Y A V E N U E .;yo r ry n m°6 z / n t 3.49" 1 /oD1s3; / cam•- _ S89.35'30•EJ 162.29 •S6 155 43 4-49.36'0i= DI: 1n 5D° .Jt al 8 Z20 I 6.60-19 / [43_08 1 208.02 11 3 6 9J v. 0 c1 o 0 0• m0' 01 co') 15Ary5 1 R 5 4p I 102.60 -1 o'ot :4'. ° N 1 -O O 2 °z L- - - 11 h / 102.60 i - 702-60- -1 1 :'' 1°on 2 -°7 I^ N l 8 _ - ?J - I 102.60 �� r- TOrei -- w 8 3 , °n n N 8 L_ - ZLL South Line NEt /4 -NWI /4 Sec.9 -T3IN -R22W 102.60 r- 7D23er -� 1 o 18 4 a �ry 1- 2 ___L NT- .-- Rural 102.60 _ °r -97.53 ry� dry 8 5 - to N Cooperative 106.81 N89 °35'30 "W 1 • r �5�6 52' \ D id °°24 42 \ I \ to \ Iw 6 lU T 1- Power Association Drainage an 164.12 '`v s / 96, \\ a / 4 - .sue \� / `,3 \ / q \ \ \ N6218.55•E , � -71.50 d1 \Z \N' \ 191 1_ 1513 _ Easement ,551 Per Doc. Utility 5-...6-- 2 'Easement -J7.48 263.11 t>h z MIDWEST Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. 2638.29 263.34 7 Py� r +I: Lam' N897548W r mil@ 7f 554 I Al 30768 •� ry 151'.4 h cam"' aN m aMu �`S17933 '35' 736.0 N8935'28•W South Line - -NW1 /4 -NEI /4 Sec.9- T31N -422W 212.89 N89 °35 28 "w 1 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: II 5- '`5 10-1 II1 t-10 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING REAR LOT LINES AND ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. / NOTES: FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER OF SEC.9 -T31N -R22W IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N89'35'30'W. O - DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET. MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED 'RLS 19421• • - DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND h 49 31.49 sp -2042- - - -- -61.05 - u\ 8 VI o a° n�NHry 29476 - - - g .. "4°3 1 E 1 „ -- 1624.77 -..- 1 `- t Rurol Cooperative Power 1900.64 ti Association Easement Per "' - Doc No. 320796. - -- - - - Ard Drainage and Utility Easement D'4p ;, OUTLOT h '0 N 00' 22' 52' E GRAPHIC SCALE ao CALE 10 SCALE 18 FEET 1 inch = 80 feet fUV • AGENDA ITEM V.0 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: May 10, 2006 TOPIC: Planned Unit Development - Final Plan Legacy Townhomes BACKGROUND Hartford Group Inc. has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a portion of the townhome property within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the units and the final plat of a portion of the townhome property. This item was continued at the April 12, 2006 regular meeting, so that several comments from the board and city staff could be addressed. Revised architectural plans were submitted and are attached to this report. ANALYSIS *Governing Plans This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit Development for the site. The proposed layout is significantly conforming to the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout that is included in the Development Guide. Some changes that have occurred through the grading and street projects the city has undertaken have included the moving of the `Woods Edge' street west to allow homes to be built on the east side of the site. Also, changes have arising due to the fact that previous plans only depicted back to back type of units with tuck under parking. The applicant is now proposing a different product for a portion of the site. The proposed townhomes are located in a Residential Land Use Area and will be located within a portion of Lot 15 (according to the land use plan of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide). The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates that there is a 50% build -to line requirement for this portion of the site; but no `Required Building Entries' nor any `Gateways' are indicated for the portion of the residential site currently proposed for development. *Density and Diversity The standards require between 10 and 24 units per acre, not to exceed 190 units. The current proposal includes 98 units within 14 buildings. This would occur on 9.42 acres for a density of 10.4 units per acre. The future development of the corner parcel should only increase that density figure. Legacy Townhomes, page 2 Worementioned previously, the district boundaries have seen minor adjustment due to the continuing road project, more detailed evaluation of the site, and the change in townhome product type. The standards require that a variety of housing types is provided within the residential area, for the entire townhome development the applicant is proposing a seven -plex townhome with two distinct facade treatments; and in the future the portion of the site adjacent to the traffic circle will provide a distinctly different type of building likely to include underground parking. Building Massing and Placement The grading plan shows that the developer has minimized grade changes to limit the use of retaining walls as much as possible. For the majority of the buildings all grade changes will be done with sloping. All retaining walls used are below the five foot requirement. The buildings measure no greater than 39 feet in height from any grade level and entries for each unit are accessible to either open space or public street. The buildings are sited 15 feet from right of ways with patio /yard areas in front of each unit to maintain the street presence and create the transition zone between private spaces of the homes and the public spaces. The parking for each unit is provided with depressed grade parking on the first floor rear of each building unit with landscaping in between each garage and for some driveways for additional parking. fhe setbacks for this type of product are as follows: Table 7. Residence and Garage Setbacks (measured from lot line unless otherwise noted) Structure Setbacks Side Setbacks (excluding Street - Facing Sides) [1, 3] Street- facing Front and Side Setbacks [1, 2] Rear Setbacks RESIDENCE SETBACKS Attached residences with individual unit entrances 10' min. -15' max., or 5' if garage is alley - loaded. 15' min. from centerline of alley, or 15' min. from rear property line when no alley 5' on each side of structure, 0' between attached units in one structure, GARAGE SETBACKS Garages or parking lots for duplexes, townhomes, or other attached units with individual unit entrances Min. 1'from dwelling facade for every 2' of garage facade width. 141 No garage shall comprise more than 50 percent of the width of the total street - facing frontage for each unit. 12' min. from centerline of alley, or 3' min. from rear property line if no alley 5' on each side of separate garage structures, 0' between attached garages in one structure MOTES: [1] Projections. Bay windows, fireplace elements, and balconies may extend into the front setback up to four feet, for a width not more than 10 feet. The maximum extension of a projection into a side yard is 3 feet. [2] Depressed Parking. Where a lugh water table prevents depressed parking, at -grade structured parking must be placed at the rear of the structure with residential uses lining the front facade to finished grade. Legacy Townhomes, page 3 believes that all of these setbacks are being met, though the intention of some is a bit lost due to notations • Staff 3 and 4 being absent from the approved guidelines. Specifically, it is staff's belief that the setback of the garage from dwelling facade is only applicable to garages that are on the front facade. Architectural Standards The Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guidelines (LLTCDDG) typically require a base, middle, and top approach to the commercial architecture within the Legacy at Woods Edge project. However, it does not require this within the residential architectural standards. So that approach will not be followed. All units include windows within the doors, as well as surrounding the doorway for transparency and daylighting. All doors (including the garage doors) are also panelized for further detail. Windows for the units cover well over 25% of the front facades and on the main living floor of each unit the windows are within the parlors and dining rooms. Staff has recommended a condition that will address the need for a recess of at least two inches for all windows and doors. There is also a recommended condition prohibiting slider windows, as is mandated by the design standards for the project. The developer has provided a great deal of variation in the roof forms of the buildings including the changes in heights and the addition of gabled dormers. For the patio areas that are provided at the front of the units the applicant is proposing a decorative wrought iron fencing that will be repeated on any retaining walls that might be necessary for grade changes. Staff would like �to see the developer wrap the corners of the buildings with the patio area to address the need to improve the uilding sides that are visible at street corners. The developer submitted revised architectural plans that at least partially address the comments of the Planning and Zoning Board from the April 12th meeting. The end of the building has been enhanced with a greater bump out, the fronts of several of the units have had bay windows added, and the project includes gutters on the front elevations. Additionally, the backs of the buildings have been revised to provide a greater level of variation. Staff feels that these revisions bring the project further into conformance with the standards than the previous plans. Parking Requirements The standards require two parking spaces per unit, which will be accommodated within the garages for each unit. The guidelines do not require guest parking because of the on -site parking on the street frontages. However, because of the location of some of the units the applicant has proposed to provide an additional 32 parking stalls which staff would like to see reduced by six so that the parking closest to Town Center Parkway and Village Drive is eliminated in favor of additional green space and landscaping. Open Space and Landscaping Chapter 4 of the guidelines does not address landscaping, therefore staff will use some of the Chapter 3.6 standards to guide the landscaping of the site. We will work with the developer prior to the next meeting to make sure appropriate materials and design are implemented. Specifically staff has a desire to further the •creening along the freeway to reduce the visibility and noise for the northern most townhome building. Additionally, staff would like to take the spaces that are reclaimed by eliminating the six parking spaces indicated above and create nice landscape /plaza amenities. Legacy Townhomes, page 4 The guidelines required 10% of the residential site to be developed as public accessible open space. The plans appear to be providing this with the central park element and the large swath of open space adjacent to the wetlands that is accessible via the street on the back side of the townhomes. The developer has submitted an exhibit that shows 21% of the site is being developed as public accessible open space. Lighting Chapter 4 of the guidelines does not include lighting standards, but the photometric lighting plan submitted with the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. The lighting proposed for the townhome area is the standard lighting that is being used throughout the Legacy project area. Engineering Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), the city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project, has reviewed the plans submitted by Hartford and has issued a letter that outlines all of their comments. The developer will be required to satisfy these comments prior to the approval of any building permits for the site. Final Plat Planned Unit Development - Final Plan applications include a final plat for the site and Hartford has submitted a final plat entitled Legacy Townhomes that includes the first phase of the project consisting of three buildings. *ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed this application at the March 29t1 regular meeting. Their comments are attached to this report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer will enter into a development agreement with the city prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 2. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim or two inch recess must be provided in accordance with the development standards for the site. • 3. All lighting fixtures must be submitted and prove to be in conformance with the requirements of the LLTCDDG. 4. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review letter must be addressed to the satisfaction of city staff. 5. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Homeowner's association documents must be submitted prior to City Council approval. 7. The applicant shall provide a bicycle parking area sufficient in size to accommodate an appropriate number of bicycles. The type of fixture provided and the location of this parking area must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. • Legacy Townhomes, page 5 8. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. 9. All ground mounted utility equipment shall be completely screened from view with appropriate landscaping materials. 10. All roof mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view. This screening shall be constructed of materials consistent with those used for the main building. 11. The homeowner's association must limit the types of furniture and accessories that can be in the front patio areas of the homes. This limitation should prohibit all folding, non - permanent, non- durable patio furniture. 12. The homeowner's association must prohibit the storage of trash receptacles outside of the units at all times except for trash days. 13. The mailboxes proposed for the development must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. Such mailboxes shall be screened with complementary materials to those of the main structures. 14. The developer is encouraged to wrap the corners of buildings with the patio areas of the end units. 15. The final plat for the buildings on the east side of the site, which have drives leading to the garages shall include a limited common element for those drives to prohibit other townhome owners from parking within the drive of another townhome. • 16. The six parking spaces shown on the site plan closest to Town Center Parkway g and Village Drive shall be eliminated and replaced with additional landscaping materials. 17. The appropriate access easements for the ponds will be granted to the city for maintenance purposes. 18. Sliding windows are prohibited within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project area, all sliding windows will need to be replaced with double hung windows. 19. A conservation easement shall be granted to the city as prescribed in the Environmental Board's comments. 20. Signs shall be placed to visually delineate the wetland area. 21. The landscape plan shall be reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator for conformance to the Environmental Board's comments prior to installation. 22. Additional landscaping shall be added to the north side of the project to provide a visual and noise barrier between the northernmost building and the freeway. ATTACHMENTS 1. Engineering Comments dated April 24, 2006. 2. Environmental Board comments dated April 6, 2006. 3. Revised Legacy Townhome Architectural Plan Set received May 4, 2006. 4. Legacy Townhome Final Plat received April 12, 2006. April 24, 2006 Mr. Michael Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RECEIVED APR 2 5 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Legacy Townhomes Site Plan Review SEH No. A- LINOL0305.12 SPCV Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Legacy Townhomes site at Legacy at Woods Edge, as prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed site were submitted to the City of Lino Lakes for review on April 4, 2006. Preliminary Site Plan (Sheet C2.0) 1. The detail call -outs on the plan sheet reference a detail sheet that was not provided in this submittal. The patio area fence on the easternmost unit of Building 7 has a fence post shown located in the sidewalk. Sidewalk must maintain five feet of clear width; the fence should be realigned to remain clear of the sidewalk. 3. No handicap accessible parking is shown for the internal site parking. The site parking should meet ADA requirements. 4. The applicant may wish to consider adding a fence and gate along the east side of the public trail, west of Building 9. This would direct the public away from the sidewalk in front of the Building 9 patio areas. 5. An access route to Pond 3 surfaced with either pavement or gravel must be provided from either Village Drive near the lift station, or the drive between Buildings 9 and 10 down to the pond area. Currently, no access path is shown. Preliminary Enlargement Plans (Sheet C2.1) 1. The Community Park Enlargement Layout and Landscape Plan shown on this page has a call -out stating "D412 curb around perimeter of tot lot ". A 4 -inch high curb bordering the bituminous path will trap water on the path. The applicant needs to identify where this water will be directed to and how it will be conveyed into the storm sewer system. Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C3.0) 1. Proposed slopes cannot exceed 4:1. Edit grading note 7 to reflect this. Proposed grading south of Buildings 9 and 10 is shown encroaching on the regional park. All grading operations must remain within the site. The proposed grading needs to be revised to reflect this constraint. Short Eliiott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110 -5196 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com I 651.490.2000 I 800.325.2055 I 651.490.2150 fax • Mr. Michael Grochala April 24, 2006 Page 2 3. Proposed grading around Buildings 9 and 10 must be revised to incorporate an access route to Pond 3, as stated previously. The proposed grading, as currently shown, will not allow vehicle access to Pond 3. 4. The sidewalk between Buildings 13 and 14 has a slope that is 20% or greater. Slopes on sidewalks cannot exceed 5 %. 5. The sidewalk at the southwest corner of Building 7 has a slope of 10 %. Slopes on sidewalks cannot exceed 5 %. 6. The grading between Building 1 and CBMH 110, as shown, appears to be flat. The rim elevation of CBMH 110 could be lowered to provide positive drainage from the sidewalk to the catch_basin. 7. It appears retaining walls will be required for some of the buildings fronting Village Drive, Town Center Parkway, and Woods Edge Boulevard. 8. Two rows of silt fence should be installed along the existing wetland, as additional protection at the base of the proposed slope. 9. Emergency overflows should be identified for interior drive aisles. Slope stabilization in these areas may be required. 10. Erosion control blanket is required where storm sewer outlets intersect pond slopes. • Preliminary Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Plan (Sheet C4.0) • 1. Note 10 on the plan sheet indicates that hydrants are to be located 5 feet behind back of curb. City standards require hydrants to be located 4 feet behind back of curb. Gate valves should be shown where required on the plans (hydrants, wet taps, etc.). 3. Show all water service lines coming off of Woods Edge Boulevard as beginning at the right -of -way line. Stubs will be provided "by others" to the right -of -way line. 4. The hydrant leads between Buildings 11 and 12 and Buildings 13 and 14 shall be 6 -inch diameter rather than the 8 -inch diameter as shown. All hydrant leads shall have 6 -inch diameter pipe. 5. Sanitary manhole 2 and CBMH 209 are located too close together to be constructed as shown. 6. The size of the water line on the west side of Building 14 is not labeled. 7. The westerly invert elevation for sanitary manhole MH -B in Woods Edge Boulevard shall be revised to match the elevation of the north -south invert. 8. Show the sanitary sewer services off of Woods Edge Boulevard as connecting to stubs "by others" at the right -of -way line. 9. The applicant should flatten the pipe grade from sanitary MH -A to MH 9 to minimum grade and should steepen the pipe grade from MH 9 to MH 10 to increase cleanout velocities in the dead end run of pipe. Having the dead end run of pipe, with its lower flows, at a slope greater than minimum will aid in keeping the pipe cleanout velocities higher. TRECEVED APR 2 5 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES • Mr. Michael Grochala April 24, 2006 Page 3 10. The hydrant between Buildings 11 and 12 conflicts with a proposed light pole. be moved to provide clear access to the hydrant. 11. Applicant shall provide locations of proposed sewer and water services in Center Parkway, and Woods Edge Boulevard. 12. Sanitary manhole castings shall be Type R- 1642 -B. One or the other must Village Drive, Town Preliminary Storm Sewer Plan (Sheet C4.1) 1. We recommend that CBMH 201 be moved northward so the storm sewer between CBMH 201 and Woods Edge Boulevard is moved farther away from the northwest corner of Building 3. STMH 104 must be moved so that the storm pipe from CBMH 109 to STMH 104 will maintain a 10- foot separation with the water main, as required by the Minnesota Department of Health. 3. The southwestern corner of the courtyard for the southernmost unit in Building 9 is shown as being constructed over the existing storm sewer. Either the courtyard should be revised so that no construction occurs above the storm sewer pipe or the storm sewer line must be relocated. 4. No details or quantities for rip -rap are given for FES 400. 5. STMH 401 is too shallow. The apparent 2.37 -foot build height would be exceeded by the sum of pipe diameter + wall thickness + top slab thickness + casting height. 6. The applicant should consider adding stubs at STMH 104 and CBMH 105 for future storm design flexibility on the western half of the site. Resize downstream storm sewer accordingly if stubs are provided. 7. The storm sewer connection from CBMH 301 cannot be made as shown. Connection to the existing storm sewer shall be made by utilizing a new structure at the point of connection. 8. Storm sewer pipe classes must be shown. Preliminary Lighting Plan (Sheet C4.2) 1. An additional light pole shall be installed on the south end of the drive aisle between Buildings 9 and 10. Proposed light poles are 2 feet shorter than City street lights but this may be appropriate for interior residential areas. 3. Lighting levels in the drive aisles and parking areas are not continuous but are appropriate for residential uses. Preliminary Landscape Plan (Sheet C5.0) 1. Applicant shall verify plantings around Pond 3 will not interfere with the required pond access road. 2. Planting trees on top of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, or water mains is not allowed. 3. Additional screening around the lift station site is recommended. RECEDED APR 2 5 2000 C6TV OP UNO LAKES Mr. Michael Grochala April 24, 2006 Page 4 • Preliminary Plat (Sheet C7.0) 1. Drainage and utility easements (existing and proposed) must be shown on the plat. Existing street right -of -way widths must be shown. 3. Village Drive shall be labeled on the plat. 4. Plat dimensions and bearings must be shown. General Comments 1. There was no detail sheet included in the submittal, so we are unable to review details referenced in the plan sheets. Please call me at 65 1.490.2147 if you have questions. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Robert L. Moberg, PE Project Manager nm xNm \linol \030512 \legacy townhome review.doc c: Paul Bengtson, City of Lino Lakes Aaron Archbold, Hartford Group, Inc. • RECEIVE APR 2 5 2006 CITY OF ONO LAKES • • • Memo Environmental To: Paul Bengtson From: Marty Asleson Date: April 6, 2006 Re: March 29, 2006 Environmental Board Recommendations The February 22, 2006 Environmental Board made the following recommendations for the Legacy Townhomes: Landscaping • Several changes should be made to the plant schedule. Recommend changing Sunburst Honeylocust to straight thornless Honeylocust. Sugar maples will not do well in the sandy soils of Woods Edge. Red or Sunburst maples should be substituted for the Sugar maples. Americanna /native (Redmond) Lindens should be substituted for the Cordata /non native (Greenspire) Lindens. European larch should be changed to the native Eastern Larch. Ponderosa pine should be changed to native White Pine or Red Pine. The area to the east of impervious areas and bordering the basin area (trail location area) should be planted with native Eastern Larch in the wet to mesic soils, and white oak with Red oak in the upland areas. • Conservation Easement areas should be planted with the City Native Seed mix • Top soil note in the landscape plan. Should read "all areas disturbed by construction activities except for native specified seed areas should have 4 inches of loam top soil thourghly incorporated into the subsoil and seeded or sodded..." Again, where native plants are specified, no topsoil shall be specified. • Raingarden and infiltration basins...should read "shall receive the City specified native seed mix." • Under the Sodding Installation Notes, should read "4 inches of top soil should be thouroughly incorporated into the subsoil." Areas to receive sod should not be fertilized with a 10 -10 -10 fertilizer. A starter fertilizer with "0" phospherous must be used. • Page 1 • • • Under the seeding section of the notes, there should be no specification for top soil /organic matter incorporation into the infiltration basin areas. In filtration basin areas should be seeded with the City native seed mix and any changes approved by the City of Lino Lakes. • Sodded Areas must be irrigated. • Runoff shall be directed into the storm sewers or infiltration tans when applicable. • Signs shall be placed at the edge of the wetlands. • The landscape plan shall be reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator prior to installation. Conservation Easement Recommendation • The area to the east of impervious areas and bordering the basin area be placed in a Conservation Easement with the City named as the easement holder. No top soil should brought in for native seed areas. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan A copy of the mandatory Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) submitted to the MPCA for approval should be submitted to the City of Lino Lakes Environmental for Review and Approval before any construction activity proceedes. A copy of the final approved plan must be maintained on site with the required weekly and post storm event inspection reports. The SWPPP site manager's name should be submitted to the City with how to contact this person. The location of this site must be indicated on the SWPPP. The SWPPP must indicate where rock entrances to the site construction area will be placed. The rock entrance must be at least 50 feet in length. The rock must be 1.5 inches in diameter and maintained for rock pore space. The SWPPP must indicate a "trigger point" for cleaning silt fence areas. Silt fences must be cleaned when the fences becomel /3 full. The SWPPP must indicate specific plans and intentions for dewatering on anticipated and unanticipated storm events. The plan must indicate procedures for dewatering that would prevent turbid/floculant waters from leaving the site. The plan should also indicate a method to control wind erosion off of the site. The SWPPP must show one, and only one area on the site where cement trucks will clean their tanks. This area must be protected from the movement of cleaned materials from the clean site. The SWPPP must indicate disposal of Cement Truck Cleaning materals after construction is finished. All storm water sewer inlets must be protected with a mechanical device such as the Royal Industries Infra Safe device. Lighting All security lighting that may be installed on the Town Homes must meet City specifications. • Page 2 LEGACY TOWS HOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA y.�• --' %sue +"e .i'�� 0341BeP ran K.ATKtna miaow, Pc. AKDa1aismsDi1ee ,a.BS VICINITY MAP PROJECT TEAM OWNER LEGACY HOLDINGS-LL LLC 1305 WELLS FARM RATA 7900 %ER%E5 AVE/81E SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, NN 55431 JACK BRANDT (952) 636 -2400 JBRANOTOHARROR0GRPDOM ARCHITECTURAL URAL BEFNICEB 7HARTFOORRDD GROUP. NG.. 5501WIECISMIGI RER5 7806 XEc ANNE SOVN 05588 N 0 NN 55431 SHAWN640111, -606 (952)638 -2436 SKNGTFIOH■RROIOGRP.COII STRUCTURAL ENONEERNo HARTFORD 1300 80105 FFIA S0 PIA2A � /ENGNEERS 7900 %DBMS AVENUE 501011 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 GAP( REN1011). PE (952) 838 -2435 GRDNHOIDOIWRWPoROGRPCOM (.ANDBCAPE ARCHHlEC1URAL SERVICES HARTFORD GROUP. NC ARCHREG0S/ENGBJEERS 1300 WELLS FARGO PLAZA 7900 MOLES AVENUE 50VIN 81004010161. 10.I 55431 JOE COUINS, ASIA (952) 638 -2430 JCX11N504 ADFO OGRP.008 CNL ENCIPE6iNG 7HARTFORD 3QL I 5/ENG5EER5 3900 %ER%S AVEU0 MUM 21004140104, 101 55431 AVON ARCHBOLD. PE (952) 838-2432 A4RCHECLDOHARWOROGRP.COM RShaffrCAL BERJIC� Bon Shaffer 11wn Hampshire Mi Minneapolis. 1Mn 5 3 5 9 9820 55436 (952) 995 -2200 mHanen5bl4mmlerlsa.aam E#NRONMFNTAL SERVICES Kevin Hallman Braun Inttlec 11001 Hampshire Ave. 5. Minneapolis, NN 55438 (952) 995 -2200 UN11m5nOblcu5nlerlecsam RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES SHEET INDEX DATE 11 TITLE SNEET LEAL C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS k REMOVALS PLAN C2.0 SITE PUN --- C2.1 ENLARGEMENT PLANS --------- C3.0 GRADING k EROSION CONTROL PLAN---- - -_ -__ 04.0 SANITARY SEWER k WATERMAIN PLAN --_-__-_-____ - C4.1 STORM SEWER PLAN C4.2 LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PUN C5.0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PUN - 5/5/2006 -5/5/2006 ------ - -____ -0/5/2006 -------- - - -5/5 /2006 - - --- ---5/5/2006 - -- 5/5/2006 -- 5/5/2006 -0/5/2006 C6.1 SITE DETAILS I -------------------- -5/5/2006 ---- 5/5/2006 C6.2 SITE DETAILS II 06.3 SITE DETAILS III 3/5/2006 ISM GTURAL A1.1 SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 FLOOR PUNS -5/5/2006 A1.2 SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 FLOOR P1AN5 - -- - 9/5/2006 A1.3 SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 FLOOR PUNS - X5/5/2006 A1.4 SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 FLOOR PLANS---------- - -� - -- __3/5/2506 A3.1 ENLARGED UNIT 41' FLOOR PLANS -5/5/2006 113.2 ENLARGED UNIT 1B1 FLOOR PLANS --------- - A3.3 ENLARGED UNIT -B2 FLOOR PLANS --------- A3.4 ENLARGED UNIT -BY FLOOR PLANS --------- A3.5 ENLARGED UNIT .01- FLOOR PLANS -- -5/5/2006 _ -_ - -_- -5/5/2006 - __- __ -_ -_- -5/5/2006 A3.6 ENLARGED UNIT C2 FLOOR PLANS -0/5/2006 A3.7 ENLARGED UNIT 'CS' FLOOR PLANS ----------------------- _ -- _5/5/2006 A3.8 ENLARGED UNIT 'C4' FLOOR PLANS------------- _ - - -_ -- -5/5/3015 A5.1 SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS -5/5/2006 55.2 SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS -- 56.1 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS UNITS A1' k 'B1' - 5/5/2000 A6.2 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS UNITS 'B2' k 'B3' - -5/5/2006 58.3 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS UNITS "C1' k L-2' /5/2504 A6.4 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS UNITS 'C3' k 'C4' _- _5/5/7006 A7.1 BUILDING 5ECTKIN5 x/5/2006 A9.1 DETAILS I- COMMON AREAS k STAIR A91 DETAILS II- WALL TYPES k JOINTS A93 DETAILS III - WINDOW/DOOR 59.4 DETAILS N- F1DOR /CEIUNG A9.5 DETAILS V- ROOF A10.1 CASE k MILLWORK ELEVATIONS k DETAILS •----- _---- -__ -_- __5/5/7904 A11.1 FIXTURE ELEVATIONS AND DOOR k WINDOW SCHEDULES-- -- -- - A11.2 90014 FINISH SCHEDULE k GENERAL NOTES--- - - - - -- 3/5/2004 FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AVA8.. UI C1.l /CIV1.211VCCK PLANNER A . HARTFORD 1/(01411.11FORO AAA lank 5541 A PPal P time ovdaMm/ Ane,e, id%dined* Mabel un* IM Mn s h M Yi®e4 Nereid IL lace MOW, NN 10162 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL., LLC. 1WO PARSOPIA7A AW XERKB AVENUE MUTH 404 55 ON, MN 5$01 135 2 55: 80 3K: 53 hHw1 PRO.. ECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO IAKE5 MINNESOTA ISSUE: 92/26/05 MUM. SRI PLAN 5/10/06 0r10 SUBMITTAL 4/5/09 010 08499E515 _Vy0G Ci1T SUBMITTAL 5/5/05 ND SET ZL REV. THIS SHEET . 7 N0 REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER: T1 • 0 CURB ANO 9J11E1 EXISTING POND 4 NWL 890.00 HWL892.30 .1 a V/ if ,r- . / '`s -� ��!' / / .. -". /. UTM 460 `. ._,.i`N.�\ \ \` // l � \' E / // b BFUMINWS PAVEMENT 10 ALIGN WTI 6X51185 CURB BFNMINWS SHAM MEET COSTING PAVEMENT (11P.) 0)1E1D PAWNOR 2' MINIM BEY5D 085INC OMB ALKDYENT /( l {`1 ♦i� BNMWNO85 PAVEMENT (1YP.) 'I IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL° 1 ENCLOSURE IS SPECTER. CONCRETE PAD 1W1B0% UNITS SDE O EACH AS SPECIFIED MAINTAIN 3' YINW8M CLEARANCE ON AI'ISY4a E 4 UNIT (M1.) 9 ELECTRICAL 08510E AS °FED. O PAD_ EXISTING WETLAND MT CIE WALK 1 MEET PAVEMENY MG/ 2' YIMNUM("' S1NGI • RBI 01YENIl ! V3• TO 5 MO/MEET EMSRNG�PR lPt- -.� 0 Y >.9 VIM AS SPECTIT CLEARANCE O NNYM SDE CF EACH L095 (TIP 86)2 CURB AND GUTTER (TM.) EXISTING WETLAND 1 11/ CPNWETE WM1C(T1P. •Q9ARC --::: --- FOR ••- . / S �' —1.— / f Y /CT �/NAIIBOX UNITS AS SPECIFIED. ?ANNUM 3' MINIMUM TAPER CURB 4' TO AUG MIN MEET EXTEND PAVEMENT • GNY�` 1WINOS PAVEMENT (TP.) 4-- LAYOUT AND PAVING NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIN CITY ORDINANCE 2. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS. AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN 1HE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. S DECORATIVE PAVER LIMITS AND LAYOUT SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT COLORS AND MATERIALS FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDINGS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL COORDINATE 9(194 THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS 5. CONTRACTOR MAY REWE5T ELECTRONIC FILE INFORMATION FOR ACCURACY OF INSTALLATION AT THE DESCRERON OF 794E OWNER. 6. PARKING STALLS SMALL BE STRIPED 9810 A 4' WIDE WH1E PANTED UNE ALCL50IBLE ACCESS AI51E5 SHALL BE PAINTED WITH A 4' WIDE WHITE PAINTED UNE; 18' ON CENTER AND AT 45' ANGLE TO THE STALL STOP LINES SHALL BE 12' WIDE %HITE PAINTED UNE 7. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENTS SHALL COORDINATE 11111.1 THE EXISTING BENCHMARK AS INDICATED Pi THE SURVEY/EXISTING CONDITIONS DRAWING. SIGN SCHEDULE: ® STOP SIGN (R1 -1) ® VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING 12X18' (1.35) © VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING 12X1! (R7 -80) MOUNT BELOW SIGN B STOOP HEIGHT SCHEDULE: ) G50NG CONCEIE APRON MUTT OF WALK SHALL MEET EN WAS( (TTP.) _ — - NUAGEDRIVE ELECIEGALENO-05111F___ AS SPECIFIED. IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL EN O8�115 E AS SPED CONCRETE PAD 1 1.X UNITS AS 5PEDFlED YAMTAIN 3' MINIMUM CLEARANCE ON ACCESSIBLE SIDE OF EACH UNIT (TR.) • l$F �5, t BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SHALL MEET EMS1NG PAVEMENT (TIP.) TAPER NEW CURB 4 TO ALIGN MTH EXISTING COD CONTINUE ORNAMENTAL SIDE O WALX CONCRETE WALK BTWWOU5 WALK r., 1 a ar/FPg —r / s CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER (TIP. APPROXIMATELY 80 LF. TEN • ROAD WIT OF BITUMINOUS WALK. COORDINATE LOCATION MN THE APPRO8MAIELY-30 LF. OF D4 2 1'8 N ""LIMIT O DISTURBANCE .'■••■ b 0 'kW ACCESSIBLE CURB CONCRETE WALK e RETAINING WALL WITH OMAN LING 41" O USNRB ARCS .1 EXISTING .+ POND 3 % +, NWL1388.4D ' •/I HWL889.70 . 1 � - LIMIT OF BANQ (D COMIC T 1005, null FORD GROUP NE, WC A000TC(WEN01NE£RLHUeE15 C6.2 © 1 RISER -6' GRADE CHANGE ® 6 RISER ■36' GRADE CHANGE NOTE: SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR ADDITIONAL SITE STAIRS LEGEND: BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREA CONCRETE WALK DECORATIVE PAVEMENT YAWN PATIO AREAS PROPOSED UGNRNG -SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROPOSED BENCH -SEE PLANS FOR DIFFERENT TYPES PROPOSED ELECTRICAL AND IRRIGATION ENCLOSURE PROPOSED MAILBOX UNITS - • LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE - - -- PLATTED PROPERTY UNE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - - - - - 15' BUILDING SETBACK FROM PROPERTY UNE ORNAMENTAL FENCE OR RAIL PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGACY TOWN HOMES 01111.08 B, AND OUT-0T D THE 160061 OF WOWS EDGE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA BUILDING M-1114 7 UNIT TOWN HOME BUILDING TYPE A OR TYPE B LEFT OR RIGHT LEFT OR RIGHT ON BUILDING IDENTIFICATION NOTE RELATES TO 114E LOCATION OF THE MECHANICAL ROOM. LOCATION VARIES PER BUILDING VERIFY AND COORDINATE WEN ARCHITECT. ENGINEER. AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO C0N51RUCTON. SEE UTILITY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. EXISTING WETLAND 2O® RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNER HARTFORD OROU1• 0)0 ON(:J :VA .325A M0.21 I NsN4 may NA 08 pM. adoMr Peon as Amend N AN a emir MC ayaMmi awl Rat I as a WI 9..4 . 9(3. MIMI % r w Mn El Mw HNMSIa. 80091 9nr Uas A NOM CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL., LLC. O 7900 RXES AVME SOWN 81001UXGfIX1,.W 55735 28(23® -0401 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO 19015 MINNESOTA ISSUE: 12/28/05 PRELIM. SITE PLAN 3/18/06 0189 511999101 4/3/06 COT COMMENTS 5/5/01 CRY 5119998AL 8/5/06 RID SC A REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE: SITE LAYOUT PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C2.O ISSUE: 12/06/05 PREM. 51000 PLAN 3/10/06 OTT SUBMDTAL 4/3/05 CRT COMMENTS 5/5/01 OTT SUBMIRAL 5 /5 /05 BID SET 16. REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THI5 SHEA • R.EG_ EI.V,E; M X7 © 4.7006 1 I 1 CI 1 1 .., ..., LAKES ACk NOTES; 1. COURACTOI SNAIL. ALIIRNAIE PATIO LAYOUT' MW I AWN LAYOUT PER UMT AS SRAM ON ME ORAWNGS. 2. LOCATION (K STOW AND STAIRS, ORNAMENTAL FENCE, AND 101001 R SMAA5 SHALL BE STAKED IN INE FIELD AND ' RELIEVED RT DIE IANDCAPE ARGITECT PRIOR TO INS IAILAIION. ORNAMENTAL FENCE (TIP. FOR_ ENTIRE LENGTH OF RNDRIO) - - GARA0E ACCESS CONCRETE PAO FOR MECHANICAL ANO UILTY CONFECTIONS COORDINATE MTH ARCHITECTURE (TIP. PER'UM1) TYPICAL TOWN HOME BUILDING y1 -#14 (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) OECORA ITYE PAIFLENT / .. PATIO WIN SOLD. COMSE OORODN (TYP.) -STAIR AND STOOPS PER Mr / SEE ARCHITECTURAL ORAWN05 (rm.) // / / G• .'..il W. 0 qar ACCESS CARAFE ACCESS LCCAMON' CFFTIOURE _ 9NAL1 HE COOIDNAIEO M100 1110 019 BE PER 1__ - 00!- 5¢aMal+cr., PLAN (T0P'). -_ .. 5r 5 MAT OE pNaacn44_01‘.4 STOOP CON[. 0100P CONC. • • 1 Yap ■ A 1MyV 5100! CON[ LOCA11014- IIFTIXIGAE_ J. j(41 ...__ "SHALL L000ONATED "". •:. E111T11P'1 PER'UNR AS .' W Mini TIE _.:.._- 'UNDS(ppE ARCIIRCT - - -' TYPICAL BUILDING ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT PLAN (BUILDINGS 11 -110) CONCRETE P N -unurr CO MEC1ON COCNDINA1E MTI MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR 1TPICAL TOM NOME BUILDING /1-(14 (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) TYPICAL GARAGE ACCESS ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN (BUILDINGS 11 -110) 2.5 0 5 TYPICAL GARAGE ACCESS ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN (BUILDINGS 111 -114) 2.5 0 5 0 TYPICAL BUILDING ENLARGEMENT LANDSCAPING PLAN (BUILDINGS 11 -110) 0 BITUMINOUS WALK WITH CURB EDGE (TYP.) m CONCRETE WALK (TYP.) BENCH TYPE 1) (TYP. OF 2 TOTAL) CONCRETE PAVEMENT BELOW ALL BENCHES (TYP.) SOD SOD SOD OPEN TURF AREA POTENTIAL FOR WINTER ICE SKATING (MAINTAINED BY THE ASSOCIATION) • MA COMMUNITY PARK ENLARGMENT LAYOUT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 • 1010' •3-2-11=1 S 1 10 5� 1 10 500 STOOP ANTI 5wR5 M 5100P AND STARS CRT COMMIE WAU(. 02AOE. AND UNITS SHALL MATPT E10511110 MANU( ORNAMENTAL FENCE DECORATIVE PAVEMENT MTH SODER COURSE BORDER MP.) EDGE Of WALK (1131.3-- --- 'IAj I TYPICAL PATIO ENLARGEMENT LAYOUT PLAN (BUILDINGS 11 -1114) 2.5 0 _ TYPICAL UNIT ENLARGEMENT LANDSCAPE PLAN (BUILDINGS -114) 2.5 0 FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 112sp •WN OM ON P•• NNMAdiw s NB. a PPM An • 34 NA. Owl N t .d Ma co a 0. - 0 . •00. • A00. &NS On km 0. 4N d 1Y.sLL Ob - AIrAY 22•••• N• MEN CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC. ,NNa•.wA SNOW pry: (H37q 3q1 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LMOM MINNESOTA SHEET TITLE: lin ENLARGEMENT PLANS SEDGE:NT :FEN ALONG WETAN,W ;'J 1F / /�' -` / ? /r�iJ i / /J%% / / \\ ,11� \ / SHALL co \ \ STABILIZED NAME SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED BY TIE CITY H ( ALONG ME ANO. SPACE 5 APART O' I_ EXISTING WETLAND OSION BLANKET (11P.) EXISTING WETLAND /-Th DOUBLE ROW O SEDIMENT FENCE 101,- ALONG WET.NND. TI SPACE 5' APART 1 IBUILDING62 I I 7 UNIT TOWN HOME I BUILDING TYPE B• RIGHT I I 6. -- _ es. airelirrelLENIVal Gi W II.Ei Y rlitf'� FINBHW catADE wo EXISTING WALK CON 'U RETAINING WALL TAM ORNAMENTAL RAI NG I 1/ k 1�Y 1'1 1- ..S)_ ---- �\ TH CITY WALK ON BLANKET (TYP.) NATIVE SEED MIX AS SPECF40 BY TIE CRY SEDIMENT FENCE (IYP.) \ EXISTING WETLAND DOUBLE ROW OF SEGNwT ALONG WETLAND. SPACE 5' APART -t— NATIVE S® MIX AS (:rte— SPECIFIED BB =1E my — 20 0 40 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION 70 ESTABUSH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO LOANING AND SODDING AGITATES. 2. UNSUITABLE EXCESS FILL MATERIAL, AS SPECIFIED. SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF —SITE. 3. SUITABLE EXCESS RLL MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED IN A MANNER AND LOCATION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. ALL AREAS DISTURBED OUTSIDE THE UNIT OF WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOWUNE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS 6. LONGITUDINAL SLOPES OF WALKS SHALL BE 5% (MAX.) AND 1% (MIN.) AND 20 (MAX.) CROSS SLOPE EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 4:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERVASE ON THE DRAWINGS. SLOPES GREATER THAN 4:1 SHALL REQUIRE SURFACE ROUGHENING BY EITHER STAIR5100 GRADING. GROOVING. FURROWING. OR TRACKING TO AVOID RUNOFF VELOCITY AND RECEIVE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. SLOPES LESS THAN 4:1 NOT STABILIZED WITH VEGETATION SHALL HAVE THE SURFACE ROUGH GRADED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY UNTIL SOD HAS BECOME STABLE AND MATURE AT NO TIME THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SHALL SLOPES BE A SMOOTH GRADE OR A COMPACTED SURFACE t — EROSION CONTROL NOTES: --P- 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEGMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL STa1LMS AS 91011N ON THE DRAWINGS IN ADDITION TO OTHER MEASURES THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACONITES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY ORDINANCE 2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING 1HE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. THIS MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE CLEANING AND /OR REPLACING SYSTEMS THAT HAVE BECOME CLOGGED OR NO LONGER FUNCTIONAL AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER /LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT MONTHLY MID AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM. 4. CONTRACTOR %LAU BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND SATISFACTORY DISPOSAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK AND SOIL STABILIZATION AS DIRECTED BY TH0 ENGINEER. 5. FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROXIMATELY 30 LF. OF SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE OUTLET OF EACH STORM DRAIN PIPE TO CONTROL AND MINIMIZE SEDIMENT RUNOFF. 7. SEDIMENT FENCES 5HALL BE CLEANED AT THE OBSERVATION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, CITY. OR CONTRACTOR WHEN 1HE FENCE BECOMES 1/3 MAXIMUM FULL LEGEND: 419 420 + 4220 EOF o °o 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 5' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SEDIMENT FENCE SPOT GRADE ELEVATION EMERGENCY OVER FLOW AREA ON INTERIOR DRIVES UNITS OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NATIVE SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED BY 1HE CITY STABIU2ED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS STAIRWAY NOTES: 1. ALL STAIRWAYS AT BUILDING STOOPS WILL BE ETHER 6' OR 36' IN HEIGHT, DEPENDING ON SURROUNDING GRADES. 2. ADDITIONAL STEPS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE CONNECTION TO SIDEWALKS. 3. FINAL STAIRWAY DETERMINATIONS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD BY THE CONTRACTOR, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. AND SUBJECT TO RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENONEER/LANOSCAPE ARCHITECT. RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IHARTFORD EC0(T11' A/43 fNC.� AI I N** .04801 WN AL. +P Ow▪ l iy*. 8 30 lwv 8. 8..30 • LEdE*p MiLH aHEM N. d IN WM M MLo!A OW Pa422 Ue*M Wow ILA NMI CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC. 1300 WELLS MMTWA 3BXERXES ONE3H O IX6T. MHI (ni)�a1N PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE UNO LAMS MINNESOTA ISSUE: 12/26/05 PRELIM. SITE PLAN 3/16/0* CITY SU9MRTAL 4/3/06 CRY COMMENTS 5/5/06 CRY 519857/1 5/5/89 MD 5O 2. REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE: GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C3.0 Q m..MPll Gas IraTIaw GM/0 ME. 6CMW IICMDGYEe.MAHEM • i �'� / / / / /' /// / , `` / / '/i i L L Y L U L L L L L 4 ti r EXISTING of ;POND 11,14: l217 _ ( / � � °f f 1 C s L L Y Y 4 L L \L / I / / /f / / // / / L 1 (� EXISTING WETLAND u L iii WETLAND L L I 11 L Ss 111, L 4 L le / L 4-11MY L L 5. L4 i/ �tsfo re �9l al■..n 4 L L V4e ( ",A =lf ��� L L -R �.II L \ L MP \ L� =pi1 L L L\ L'-Y1 I •/I b VIII rell / L L 'da 11�,[II,�% i �,1�' 07 '-riet tordirr.vi 7114,1.1 1 L OR": 7= 1 6. 112 ��� Y ,�G L� 4 ____- L7mnatre Schedule Project NI Projett. Note: See mitten specification for man detailed fixture infannotion. 591 Symbol 12 15 TI(1 TX Deacrlptlon Lunen LLF Lumen D6AS50- 1001-IPS- SCB3M- HSt12' high to match street Tight) Lumen DMS50- 150HP5 -SC8364 (14 high -match *treat light) 9500 16000 0.800 0.800 EXISTING WETLAND L ti7S.L� n ----- - -_6�4 L 4�19�b -6-16 4 C L 4 L. L L L. -G-L, L L `L -G i lu-rA 4 L L'. '11.--.14 _ L L L L L _ t i;/TINCL .PC1IND L r NW: 60840 / Lf:. ^.}l:OS4p L/ 50 / /7- L L L / S, L L L L L L T truer -1r •L -bi- -b -4• . 0. 9. 5, 5. 60 5. 9. 9. 0. 5. EXIS WET1 40' 3[7;!;!0 -Bann Height to be Determined III LUMEC OM550- xxk1PS- UAS45703C- 44358SH T4YE 110- 14' Mount Height, 1511HPS Lamp TYPE TKt- 12' Mount Height, 70HP5 Lamp RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNER o 11 HARTFORD Ec pirp, AM Mats Na. Mtn. L CONSULTANT: i MISO 1.1.124. 1.e Mgr, LAW 4.432.103, 112.32-1141 • aa COMM, SCarr MM. . OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC. 3awau rAVn RP. 7900 KB s49eM7e mlmn MaaUNmaN.e15H37 s1ea.0o 1 BM iw! PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAUDS MINNESOTA ® mmNGm 2005. 4am7006 GROUP Al, 17c.wcwnFL75/E*S1000 5M7umE65 ISSUE: 12/20/05 Perm. SIZE 9560 3/10/06 CITY 1t16MR1AL 4/3/05 CRY COMMENTS 5/5/06 Cf1Y SIpMRTAL 5/5/06 NM SET 0 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHED- T)TLE: PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.2 • • Mount Height Numeric Summary Project: All Projects Project: All Prefect. SeqNo Luba 2 Label Cde re Unite Avg Mat Min 1 iK 14 All area Illuminance e Fe l 0.40 I 1 },0 0.0 2 TIC i 14 3 TIC 14 4 11( 14 PROVIDE (4) LANDSCAPE GROUND UGHTS, TRANSFORMERS, 5 11( 14 YARE5, STAKES, AND APPURTANANCES PER UNIT AS 6 TK 14 SPECIFIED. SEE ENLARGEMENT PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION. COORDINATE LOCATION 741H THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 7 115 14 a tic 14 PRIOR TO IN57ALLA1101. 9 11( 14 10 DC 14 11 TK 14 12 11( 14 13 TIC 14 14 71( 14 15 7K 14 16 1K1 12 17 1K1 12 18 11(1 12 19 1151 12 20 1111 12 21 1151 12 22 1K1 12 23 1K1 12 24 TK1 12 25 11(1 12 26 1K1 12 27 1K1 12 EXISTING WETLAND L ti7S.L� n ----- - -_6�4 L 4�19�b -6-16 4 C L 4 L. L L L. -G-L, L L `L -G i lu-rA 4 L L'. '11.--.14 _ L L L L L _ t i;/TINCL .PC1IND L r NW: 60840 / Lf:. ^.}l:OS4p L/ 50 / /7- L L L / S, L L L L L L T truer -1r •L -bi- -b -4• . 0. 9. 5, 5. 60 5. 9. 9. 0. 5. EXIS WET1 40' 3[7;!;!0 -Bann Height to be Determined III LUMEC OM550- xxk1PS- UAS45703C- 44358SH T4YE 110- 14' Mount Height, 1511HPS Lamp TYPE TKt- 12' Mount Height, 70HP5 Lamp RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNER o 11 HARTFORD Ec pirp, AM Mats Na. Mtn. L CONSULTANT: i MISO 1.1.124. 1.e Mgr, LAW 4.432.103, 112.32-1141 • aa COMM, SCarr MM. . OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL, LLC. 3awau rAVn RP. 7900 KB s49eM7e mlmn MaaUNmaN.e15H37 s1ea.0o 1 BM iw! PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAUDS MINNESOTA ® mmNGm 2005. 4am7006 GROUP Al, 17c.wcwnFL75/E*S1000 5M7umE65 ISSUE: 12/20/05 Perm. SIZE 9560 3/10/06 CITY 1t16MR1AL 4/3/05 CRY COMMENTS 5/5/06 Cf1Y SIpMRTAL 5/5/06 NM SET 0 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHED- T)TLE: PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C4.2 • • • f $�1 p{M'Ly.4 LISTING 'POND 4 I NWL 890.00 I HWL 1192.30 1�. EXISTING WETLAND 10' EXISTING WETLAND 10 COInuaNa ADS, INNI n= Opp AA, W C NbwECIVIN6wURSII MN tS N 1 Itsnocu EXCEPT 009 NATIVE SPECIFIED (SEEDI AREAS. SHIN RECEIVE 4' OF LOAM TOP SOIL THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED INTO THE SUBSOIL AND SEEDED OR SODDED. AREAS WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL RECEIVE LOAM AND S00 WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING. SEE SOD INSTALLATION NOTES BELOW. 2. SYMBOL OF TREES AND SHRUBS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE REPRESENT FULL MATURITY SIZE OF THE PLANT. COORDINATE LOCATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTIJTIES. UGHTING FIXTURES. DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE BALLED IN BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP. 4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4° LAYER OF 1 -1/2° DIAMETER GRAY ANGULAR TRAP STONE ON TOP OF A NON- BIODEGRADABLE FILLER FABRIC AND BORDERED VAIN 3/16° THICK STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGING. 5. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON EXACT PLACEMENT OF PLANTS AROUND ALL BUILDINGS AND VATHIN THE PARK SPACE, SEE ENLARGEMENT PLANS. SCHEDULE BELOW INCORPORATES ALL PLANT MATERIAL FROM ALL PLANS. 4- SODDING INSTALLATION:--4- 1. 4' TOPSOIL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED INTO THE SUBSOIL AND FREE OF CLODS, ROCKS, AND DEBRIS AS APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. AREAS TO RECEIVE 50D SHALL BE FERTILIZED PATH 25 POUNDS PER 1000 SG.FT, (1000 LB /AC) OF 10 -0 -10 FERTIJZER AND WORKED INTO 7HE TOPSOIL. 3. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DAMPENED PRIOR TO LAYING THE 500. JOINTS IN THE 50D SHALL BE STAGGERED. AND THE EDGES BUT1ED TOGETHER TIGHTLY TO AVOID GAPS BETWEEN SOD LENGTHS 4. S00 INSTALLED ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER. OR N AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOWS. SHALL BE STAKED IN PLACE. INSTALL THE SOD 441111 THE LENGTH PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATER FLOW FOR SLOPES WITH SHEET FLOW. 5. AFTER INSTALLATION, AREAS SHALL BE TAMPED OR ROLLED TO PROVIDE GOOD CONTACT BETWEEN SOD AND SOIL AFTER ROLLING. THE SOD SHOULD BE WATERED SO THAT THE SOIL IS MOISTENED 4 INCHES BELOW THE 500. 44-- SODDING MAINTENANCE: ---0)- 1. IN THE ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE RAINFALL WATER 500 DURING THE 30 DAY PERIOD FOLLOWING PLACEMENT TO KEEP 5OL MOIST. FOLLOWING THIS INITIAL 30 DAY ESTABUSHMENT PERIM, WATER AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE MOISTURE N THE ROOT ZONE 2. WHERE MOWING IS DESIRED, MAINTAIN GRASS HEIGHT OF 3 INCHES AND SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED UNTIL THE 50D IS FIRMLY ROOTED, USUALLY TWO TO THREE WEEKS AFTER SOD 15 INSTALLED. 3. INSPECT AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW ANNUALLY AND 00110491G INTENSE STORMS MAKE NEEDED REPAIR AND REVEGETATE PROMPTLY. 4- SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS: ---$- 1. INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE SEED MIX SPECIFIED BY THE CITY PRIOR 10 INSTALLATION. 2. STABIUZED SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE NATIVE SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT BASIN SEEDING WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REPAIR AS NECESSARY ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, SEEDING AND SURFACE CONDITIONS TO INSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM AND STABILIZATION OF THE BASIN. 4. THE CONSECUTIVE YEAR MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NATIVE PLANTINGS ARE NOTED IN THE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. PREPARE STE AND SEED BASIN BETWEEN MAY 1 -JULY 1. MOW BASIN SLOPES AT A HEIGHT OF 6' -0' EVERY 30 DAYS AFTER PUNTING UNTIL SEPTEMBER 30 OR PER SUPPUERS RECOMMENDATIONS. FOR CONSECUTIVE YEAR MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS, SEE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. ► WilitgroW 4-PLANTING SCHEDULE - QTY. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DECIDUOUS TREES 20 HONEY LOCUST 13 RED MAPLE 13 REDMOND UNDFN 31 RED OAK 12 SWAMP WHITE OAK 1. ENTIRE STE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED EXCEPT THE SLOPE BETWEEN THE MOST EAST GARAGE DRIVE ACCESS AND THE EXISTING WETLAND, AND ALL AREAS RECEIVING CITY SPECIFIED SEED MIK 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR RENEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. ALL TURF AREAS. PLANTING BEDS, AND ISLANDS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. IRRIGATION 5Ta1tM WILL BE DESIGN - BUILD. 4--- CONSERVATION NOTES: 1.7HE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO IDENTIFY AND PROTECT ON -SITE VEGETATION IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE RETAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 2. IF NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION DELINEATE GENERAL POSITION OF TEMPORARY FENCING. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE FENCE ON DR NEAR THE SURVEYED PROPERTY LINE SO AS TO NOT INTERFERE MTh CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS 3. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF STABIUZED CONSTRUCT1ON ACCESS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR 70 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 4. VERIFY, ESTABLISH, FLAG, AND MAINTAIN 10' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER ALONG EXISTING WETLAND THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING MATERIALS SPECIFICALLY, BUT NOT UNITED TO, SOIL COMPACTION, DEPOSIT OF DEBRIS, AND MATERIAL STOCKPILING, CEMENT CONCRETE TRUCK CLEANING WITHIN THE WETLAND BUFFER DELINEATION. HARTFORD tGROl1P A3) INC.f 1 easi., edify Vet N. Way. r^rrclm oF0I 17 ne r sde ee /ra N4nimn .W M l en A4' Iced Aarba .Ls w low of We 4. 42 M *molt PobK 1 Sow Lion. Na 1415 RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES 4t - IRRIGATION NOTES: -1)- 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND /ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND /ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTLITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTIUTY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND METERING FAOIUTIES. 4. IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE 15 1 -i1" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANSCOVAGE. 5. ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 6. ALL LATERAL INNES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE. 7. ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2' -0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2' -0" BEYOND PAVEMENT. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO 2' -0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED. 10. FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SOUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION. 11. BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES 'aim SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS. 12. ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR. 13. GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 14. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON -SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTIVE. 15. CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USE MOISTURE -PROOF SPUCES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES. 16. AVOID OVERSPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE. 17. ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE 18. USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AN "AS- BUILT" PLAN OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF COMPLETION TO OWNER'S REPRESENTIVE. A SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON -SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION. 20. ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN. 21. ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX. THERE SHALL BE 3° MINIMUM 22. SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWER CONNECTIONS. EXISTING WETLAND 20 0 40 ROOT MNUMUM SIZE COMMENTS Gleditsio Trioconthos Var. Nanny Ace, rubrum TAN americana 'Redmond' GTUerous rubrum Ouercus bicolor B&B 098 B&B B&B B&B 2 1/2' CAL 2 1/2' CAL 2 1/2 CAL 2 1/2" CAL 2 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER FULL. FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER FULL FORM CONIFEROUS TREES 7 8LAO( HILLS SPRUCE 21 AMERICAN LARCH 12 WHITE PINE Picea Meucci deneoto Lady laaclnu PAos embus B&B 6' HT B&B 6' HT. B&B 6' HT. SINGLE LEADER -DENSE FORM SINGLE LEADER -DENSE FORM SINGLE LEADER-DENSE FORM ORNAMENTAL TREES 5 SUGAR TYA1E CRABAPPLE 45 JAPANESE TREE ULAC Moles 'SUtwom' 31 171ORNLESS HAWTHORN ®- 28 PAPER BIRCH DEODUOUS SHRUBS O O 0 0- 137 BAGATELLE B Syringe B&B 1 1/2' CAL SPECIMEN FORM ga 8&B 1 1/2" CAL WEEMEN FORM Crataeaus true-earn variety 'Warmly' 8&B 1 1/2' CAL. 51RMGHT LEADER -FULL 0088 B&B 1 1/2' CAL STRAIGHT LEADER -FULL 009*4 Betula paperllera 56 COMPACT PJM RHODODENDRON Rhododendron 'P.J.M. Compact' 56 IVORY HALO DOGWOOD 427 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIRAEA 154 COMPACT BURNING BUSH 9174 HONEYROSE HONEYSUCKLE Lonicero s 'Honey'ose' BARBERRY Berber's thunbergli 'Bagatelle' Comae albo '80Oholo' Waist Iapanieo 'Little Princess' Euogwnus aletus 'Comaaatue CONIFERIOUS SHRUBS 8 1ECHNY ARBORINTAE 140 MUGH0 SLOWMOUND CONT. 18' -24' HT. DENSE BRANCH CONT. 18' -24' HT. DENSE BRANCH CONT. 18 " -24' HT. DENSE BRANCH CONT. 18 " -24" HT. DENSE BRANCH CONT. 15 " -18" HT. DENSE BRANCH CONT. I5' -111" HT. DENSE BRANCH Thulo occidental's 'Techn4' 502 GOLDEN ARBORINTAE Pine muoa 'Soemound' 0- 31 DWARF BINE GLOBE SPRUCE Picea 4000000 'Glaboso' Thu la occidental's o EROSION CONTROL BLANKET -SEE EROSION CONTROL NOTES NATIVE SEED MIX AS SPECIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION CONT. 6' NT. CONT. 18`-24' HT. DENSE BRANCH DENSE BRANCH CONT. 155 -18" HT. DENSE BRANCH CONT. 18 -24' HT. DENSE BRANCH FOR BIDDING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS LL., LLC. 1300 WELts FARED LINA MO 7Z RYES INV. SCUI 8100IIN41art, 5,455411 '4 0111:0°? PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LINO LAME MINNESOTA ISSUE: 12/28/05 PRE11.4. WE PLAN 8/10/96 C11Y 411011R1AL 4 /0 /0e Cm L'OMYENTY 8/5/01 01111 SUIMrt1m. 8/5/06 MD SET A REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TIRE: LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C5.0 • A • SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 GRADE 1 (LEVEL 1) SCALE 1/8'=1' -0. - 111111111111 - IIIII1IIIIIIIIIII1I1I- SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 GRADE 2 (LEVEL 2) SCALE 1/8 ° =1' -0° GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF BLOCK WALL. OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL. OR TO CENTER LINE OF WINDOWS 61M. WALLS. 2. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS S BUILDING WINO FLOOR PLANS FOR ALL WALL TYPE DOOR 6 W MUO W D EB GNAT IONS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. SEE WAIL TYPE LEGEND, DOOR WINDOW. ROOM FINISH SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING 6 FLCTLIRES WITH ARCHITECT. IF MECH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR 8HALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDATELY. A. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BREAKER PANELS & FIXTURES WITH THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. IF ELEC. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 0, REFER TO STRUCTURAL PUNS FOR LINTEL SCHEDULES 6 ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUGGING. H' ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL OMWINOS, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN, IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDATELY, 8. REF. CARL NA LANDSCAPE DWOS FOR SITE INFORMATION NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. > . VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH MECN DWG9 AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR, B. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURRED CHASES AND BOFFITS REQUIRED TO CONCEAL MECHANICAL, DUCTS, PEINO, FIRE SUPPRESSION PIPING, AND ELECTRICAL WIRING. VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL MID ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS B . PROVIDE FIRE 010PPIN0 AT ALL PENETRATIONS IN RATED WALL ABSEMBUES. SEE SECTION 07270, 10. EXIT LIGHTING SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY ELECTRICAL CODE. 11. REF. BHT. A9,1 FOR SIGNAGE 0XTENTAND LOCATION 12, REF. BHT. A11.1 &A11,2 FOR ROOM FINISH 6 DOOR SCHEDULES 13. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL KITCHEN AND BATH SINK PIPER. RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES ARCHl7ECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD GR P 0I CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 1300 WELLSFARGD RA. MOP 1L um 3VE3UES9UTH 551.3)6000 531.3161101 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE 111401AKE3 MINNESOTA ISSUE: 11/11(2005 CONCEPT 12/1/2605 RV. CDNCEP7 12/7/2005 1E0. 36640077 13/21/2005 REY. CONCEPT 1/13/2000 REV. COIIC077 3/0/3006 REY. CDNCIP7 3/13/2006 CRT SUBMITTAL 4/3/2606 REV. 66NCEPT 4/27/2006 REV. OTT 3UBM1T. 5/5/2006 01Y 91BMRAL 6/5/2006 30 SET L REV. THIS SHEET ONO NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEETTITOE: SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A1.1 • • • SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 LEVEL 3 SCALE: 1/8' =i' -0' SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 ROOF PLAN (LEVEL 4) SCALE; 1/8 " =1'-0" GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF BLOCK WALL, OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL OR TO CENTER UNE OF WINDOWS l IM. WALLS. 2. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS A BUILDING WING FLOOR PLANE FOR ALL WALL TYPE, DOOR t WINDOW DESIGNATIONS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND. DOOR, WINDOW. ROOM FINISH SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING & FIXTURES WITH ARCHITECT. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 4. VERIFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUW BREAKER PANELS 6 FIXTURES WITH THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. IF ELED DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY, 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR UNTEL SCHEDULES 6 ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BEIWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL. MECHANICAL /STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN. IF SUCH ORCREPANCES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDLATELY. 6. REF. CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE 3WOS FOR SITE INFORMATION NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN 7. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WTH MECH DINGS AND IRRKATION CONTRACTOR. 6. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURRED CHASES AND SOFFITS REQUIRED PP DUCTS. SUPPRESSION PIPING, AND ELECTRICALIG VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. S. PROVIDE PIKE STOPPND AT ALL PENETRATIONS N RA7ED WALL ASSEMBLIES. SEE SECTION 07278 10. EXIT LIGHTING SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOOATIONS AS REQUIRED BY ELECTRICAL CODE 11. REF. BHT. A0.1 FDR SIGNADE EXTENT AND LOCATION 12. REF. BHT. A11.16 A11.2 FDR ROOM FINISH 6 DOOR SCHEDULES 13. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL KITCHEN AND BATH SINK PIPER. RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKFG ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD TL7 f d 6.Mtg(_1l M■41 WOO Ma /100 MOE ONE tlarN Re MP 01.10, n0eA 2s33 na1'' "TINT 50 65 R3. 11.1Nm0w RpN A 17350 1 AR 6r 3MR IN 66 • wMR RN RN RN iIRMt IL Pow RATMMI3 6. 151Q CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC FARGO RADA 768K W0V1NUE SOUTH 202.036.450 252-036.331 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE UNMAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 11/112003 CONCEPT 13 1/2003 REV CONCEPT 12/72005 REV CONCEPT 12/21/2005 REV OONCEFf 1/13/2006 REV. CONCEPT 2/3/2006 CONCEPT 3/132006 C- - - - -Ry SONITTAL - - -- A /S /2W6 REV. CONCEPT 4272006 REV q1Y SUBMIT 3/3/2006 CRY 8111NRAL B/2006 BIO SET /�:, REV. THIS SHEET `0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A1.2 • SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 GRADE 1 (LEVEL 1) SCALE 1/0'=1' -0 5111111111111111111�8111111111f 1 SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 GRADE 2 (LEVEL 2) SCALE 1/B' =1' 0' GENERAL NOTES F1. DIMENSIONS ARE TARN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF BLOCK WALL OUTSIDE OF EXTERIOR WALL OR TO CENTER LINE OF WINDOW881M. S. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS d BUILDING WINO FLOOR PLANS FOR ALL WALL TYPE, DOOR 8 WINDOW DESIGNATIONS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND. DOOR WINDOW. ROOM FINISH SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3. Aa CONTRACTOR VERIFY LOCATION NODE PLUMBING i FIXTURES WITH NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. LCONTRACTORBHAUL F VEALFY LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BREAKER PANELS B DISCREPANCIES HEEL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IF ELEC. IMMEDIATELY. RCONTMCTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR LINTEL SCHEDULES S ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL B STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN. IF SUCH IMMEDDISCREPANCIES OCCUR CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IATELY, 5. REF. CML AND LANDSCAPE OLVOS FOR SITE INFORMATION NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. 7. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRITATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND 5 810A'RON CONTRACTOR' COORDINATE WITH MECH DWGS AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR 8. CARPENTER REQUIRED TO CONCEAL O PROVIDE ALL FURRED CHASES AND SOFFITS SUPPRESSION PIING, AND ELECTRICAL%MANG VIERIFYRLOCATIOON AND SIZE REOUIRE0 WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, 8. PR0N0E FIRE 8T0PPING ATALL PENETRATIONS IN RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES SEE SECTIOSI0)270. 10. EXIT LIGHTING SHALL BE IN APPROVED LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY ELECTRICAL CODE. 11. REF. BHT. A9.1 FOR NONAGE EXTENT AND LOCATION 12 REF. SM, A11.1 B A112 FOR ROOM FINISH A DOOR SCHEDULES 13. PLACE 280171-CHEON PLATES AT ALL KITCHEN AND BATH SINK PIPES. 11,,,,E DWICE -- 1=/I/7005 fiEY DONC[PF 13/7/2003= IS/21/3` OHV DONS_ 3 20DDS te EV —CEPi� 3/3DOfiM —_ E 3 20006i_= 3U3ND7.U� S /EDpfi REY DONCEpT 3/E7/E006 R`��CIIY SUBMD ]D06 —__ 5/5/am MO SCi L REV. THIS SHEET I NO REV. THIS SHEET GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN TO OUTSIDE FACE OF BLOCK WALL 087510E FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL, OR TO CENTER UNE OF WINDOWS 8INT. WALLS. 2. REFER TO ENLARGED UNIT PLANS E. BUILDING WINO FLOOR PLANS FOR ALL WALL TYPE, DOOR 8 WINDOW OESIONATIONS NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND. DOOR. WINDOW. ROOM 71N1SH SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF PLUMBING 8 FIXTURES WITH ARCHITECT. IF MECH. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 4. VERIFY LOCATION 07 ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BREAKER PANELS 8 FIXTURES WTH THE ELECTRICAL COMPACTOR IF ELEC. DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR LINTEL SCHEDULES 8 ALL OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR SETNEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN. IF SUCH DISCREPANCIES OCCUR CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THEARCHTECT IMMEDIATELY. 6. REF. CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DINGS FOR SITE INFORMATION NOT INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. T. VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH MECH DWGS AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER � A HARTFORD EM OW WO V.5 1.1.1170 0434 ?ft (012) OB4107 PC fill, Ma 4.1 8. CARPENTER TO PROVIDE ALL FURRED CHASES AND SOFFITS REQUIRED 70 CONCEAL MECHANICAL. DUCTS, PIPING, FIRE SUPPRESSION PIPING, AND ELECTRICAL WIRING. VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZE REQUIRED WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. B. PROVIDE FRE STOPPING AT ALL PENETRATIONS IN RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. SEE SECTION 07270. 10. MDT LIGHTING SHALL 5E114 APPROVED LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED By ELECTRICAL CAGE 11. REF. SET. AB.1 FOR 313880E EXTENT AND LOCATION 12. REF. 8HT. A11.10 811.2 FOR ROOM FINISH 80008 SCHEDULES 13. PLACE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AT ALL KITCHEN AND BATH SINK PIPES. SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 LEVEL 3 SCALE: 1/8' =1,0' SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 ROOF PLAN (LEVEL 4) SCALE: 1/8" =1'.0 RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 2300 WELLS FASGO ILADI 790088538018185=11 852.6363400 952 - 6363401 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE UNOLANES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 11/11/2003 CONCEPT 12/1/200.5 REV. CONCEPT 12/7 /2005 REV. CONCEPT 12/21/2005 8EY. CONCEPT 1/13/2006 REV. CONCEPT 2/3/2006 REV. CONCEPT 3/13/2006 AT SUBMITTAL 4/3/2801 REV. CONCEPT 4/17/2006 REV. CITE SUBMIT. 5/5/2006 CITY SUIN TAL 5/8/2805 ND SET :_. REV. THIS SHEET NO REV: OILS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: Al .4 1-1,34E S EMT 1/AB.3 FOR --I A LARGEf – ELEVTION I---SEE 0001 2 /AB, FOR-H ENI P0ED ELEVATION I—SEE SHT EA FOR —I ENLARGED ELEVATION I- --SEE SNT IA rail ENLARGED ELEVTION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 FRONT ELEVATION1 I---SEE 3/1T 2 /AS.1 FOR- -� ENLARCEp ELEVATION I--SEE EMT T7A11,1 FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION SNT 4 AVA ATpN B'OR --I RGFA � SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" L —.' 1—'SEE 9TT VMS ,FOR — MARRED ELEVATNN --SEE SNT 4 /AS.1 FOR — DUNNED ELEVATION Al B1 Al I--�E 900 2/45.1 TION FOR ENLARGED ELEVA SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 REAR ELEVATION - -SEE SLIT 4 /AL1 FOR — ENLARGED ELEVATION 1---4EE SNT 2/A5.1 FOR--{ ENIARLEO ELEVATION —NEE SWF IVALo FOR — ENLARGED ELEVATION Al I--SEE SNT 2/A41 POR� ENLARGED ATNON C1 SCALE: 115 =1'-0" C2 SEE SNT B /A6.3 FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 SIDE ELEVATION1 SCALE: 1/8' =1'.0 SEE EMT 3 /AS.3 FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 SIDE ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/1'-1'.0 RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD INAlethystertlentezt 1 Malty notify that IM. Mm, .WINmbm w riwl w a1ww.t by nu or ane. oT 01. =r.Nim o.e 00 I NA a eery 111R4and Ar4h10 Itrteve the Ian 01 13 N. M Nlrmoa4. ONES lioNd IL Nam M454.Nc 16X2 CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 366 wELL5 PARGONAIA 7966 %FAXES AVENUBSOUTH 9524052901 za- 015:901 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE UNMAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 11/11/2005 CONCEPT 12/1/2505 REV. CONCEPT 12/7/2003 REV. CONCEPT 12/21/2005 REV. CONCEPT 1/13/2006 REV. CONCEPT 2/3/2001 RE, CONCEPT 3/13/2006 4X1' SUBMITTAL 4/3/2006 REV. CONCEPT 4/27/2005 REV. CITY SUBMIT. 3/5/2005 0017 314040821 5/5/2005 510 501 REV. THIS SHEET ONO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A5.1 • HFEN SKI 1 Ae3 roR ---I EN 1_ ATION I -3EE SNT 2/00.1 FOR l EN LEVATION Al 1—EE SNT II //01.4 FO ENIARGEO ELEVATION R S/If I 01.1 FOR --1 ENWIGEO ELEVATION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 FRONT ELEVATION1 1--ENSEE SNT 2/01.1 FOR- -I LAROED`ELEVATION 1--SEE 91T 4 �—iEE 9Nf amt m---1 ENIARGEO ELE Ae3 FOR- -1 ATION SCALE 1/0 =1'.0 I• --SEE SR 4/A4.4 FOR ---I ENLARGED ELEVATION TEE RNi 4/A0.1 FOR ENIAROE4- ELEVATION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 REAR ELEVATION I---SEE 91T 2 LV F'OR ---I ENLARGED ELEVATION I--SEE S4T 2/AS.4 FOR- - I ENLARGED ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'.' SEE RNT 4/01.2 FOR B ""1 ENLARGED ELEVATOR SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 SIDE ELEVATION1 SCALE: 1/8'=1'-0' SEE SIT 3/A4.2 FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 SIDE ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/8' =1'-C RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER �E 1- HARTFORD triEga IKO Mee MA TOO zINXIS MI ATI CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 79006ERlO AVENIE>DUIII 9R- 910-255 Y12dM251 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE uuowvs MINNESOTA ISSUE: 11/11/2055 CONCEPT 12/1/2005 REV. CONCEPT 52/7 /2505 REV. CONGER 12/21/2005 REV. CONCEPT 1/12/2000 REV. CONCEPT 2/5/2001 REV. CONCEPT 5/15/2005 C17T SUBMITTAL 4/5 /2005 REV. CONCEPT 4/27/2006 REV. 211T SUBMIT. 5 /5/2006 WET 5062510E 5/5/2006 NO SET .7 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A5.2 • • IFlLii: . I ®i ® ® is ®® 1--SEE 91T 4 �—iEE 9Nf amt m---1 ENIARGEO ELE Ae3 FOR- -1 ATION SCALE 1/0 =1'.0 I• --SEE SR 4/A4.4 FOR ---I ENLARGED ELEVATION TEE RNi 4/A0.1 FOR ENIAROE4- ELEVATION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 REAR ELEVATION I---SEE 91T 2 LV F'OR ---I ENLARGED ELEVATION I--SEE S4T 2/AS.4 FOR- - I ENLARGED ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'.' SEE RNT 4/01.2 FOR B ""1 ENLARGED ELEVATOR SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 SIDE ELEVATION1 SCALE: 1/8'=1'-0' SEE SIT 3/A4.2 FOR ENLARGED ELEVATION SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 SIDE ELEVATION2 SCALE: 1/8' =1'-C RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER �E 1- HARTFORD triEga IKO Mee MA TOO zINXIS MI ATI CONSULTANT: OWNER: LEGACY HOLDINGS -LL, LLC 79006ERlO AVENIE>DUIII 9R- 910-255 Y12dM251 PROJECT: LEGACY TOWNHOMES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE uuowvs MINNESOTA ISSUE: 11/11/2055 CONCEPT 12/1/2005 REV. CONCEPT 52/7 /2505 REV. CONGER 12/21/2005 REV. CONCEPT 1/12/2000 REV. CONCEPT 2/5/2001 REV. CONCEPT 5/15/2005 C17T SUBMITTAL 4/5 /2005 REV. CONCEPT 4/27/2006 REV. 211T SUBMIT. 5 /5/2006 WET 5062510E 5/5/2006 NO SET .7 REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A5.2 • • • L.EAC TOWNHOMES AT LUOOtS EE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability company, fee owner of the following described property situated In the City of Lino Lakes, State of Minnesota, County of Anoka, to wit: Out lot D, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, AnoIke County, Minnesota. Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. LEGACY HOLDINGS -U, LLC In witness whereof said Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of John C. Brandt Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Legacy Holdings -LL, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability company. on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 200_, by John C. Brant, as chief manager of I hereby certify that I have surveyed and plotted the property described on this plot as LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE; that this plat Is a correct representation of said survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat In feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments will be correctly placed In the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines ore correctly designated on said plat and that there are no wet lands as defined In Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 505.02 Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated other than as shown on said plot Eric R. Vtckaryoue, Land Surveyor Minnesota Registration No. 44125 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of Surveyor. 200 by Eric R. Vlekaryaus, Land Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires This plat of LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE was approved by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 200_ and If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By Mayor By This plat has been checked and approved this day of Larry D. Holum Anoka County Surveyor RECEIVED APR 1 2 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT MARKED AS MARKED All monuments required by Minnesota Statute, and not shown on this plat, will be set within one year of the recording dote of this plat, and shall be evidenced by a 1/2 inch by 18 inch iron pipe marked by RLS 44125. For the purposes of thls plat the south Ilne of Outlot D, THE VILLAGE N0. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota, Is assumed to have a bearing of NB9 °33'45 "W. 50 200_ u City Clerk NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE so 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch 50 ft • / / 1 / / / / / 66 i4 I2 l 03 OUTLOT B . 3 � 0o 1 p o e0'` a0 ay9 a. >I 8 '` -South 219.54 line of Outlot 0, co iy, arm \ \ City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section ti, t31, R22 60 p4,5129 D'25y0a 7 74.5'1 N87•18'36 °1Y 117.78 0 N8973.45`w [440431 48' N83°28 01 "E 149.45 -- 585•2612. s.i CD CI oeO N08'36.41'W 22 3 25.11, $1 rg2o 8 25.17 21.6, 21,6f 21.67 3g4• 21.67 21.67 8 21.6] Z 21.6 , vz6v; 8 21.6f 21.67 8 21.6/$ 25.17 s 25.17 30.68 • ' N0125.48'W 589 33'45'E ry .4 w 00,y40" •158.67 �` j�po BLOCK 1 158.67 4 25.17; 25.179 21.67 $9r 21.6 21.67 8 .6 589 33'45'E N89°33'45 'NV r THE VILLAGE N0. 31 1 J 'ri+j . C: _aos4 m T ; DETAIL , H ._ A 1 0 i- 0 m W ,1 0 • H • 5'' 0 704,1 `-32.00-" 21. 8 nr 21.69 67 21.67 122 21.87 '138 21.67 25.17 148 25.17 128.67 289.75 541.29 60 00 8 N89'21 44'W 71.59 0 00 2 NOT TO SCALE E. G. RUC) 4 SONS, INC. Land Surveyors S \rud \CAD \03proj \03170PP \03170- FINAL - PLAT- 5TH.d.g 4/10/2006 558.17 PM CDT • • HARTFORD GROUP, A/E Nk LEGACY TOWNHOMES 4.26.2006 1 x4 rt:,: • _ xa .:.:� :: rte: �r�.r� . ARTIST CONCE' Thls is an artist concept and Is subject to change. • • AGENDA ITEM V. D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: May 10, 2006 TOPIC: •Rezone to Planned Unit Development •Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Allocation of MUSA Reserve The Preserve Integra Homes BACKGROUND Integra Homes has requested approval of single family residential development called The Preserve. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density residential use. The northern part of the site is within the existing MUSA and zoned R -1, but the southern part will need MUSA and rezoning. The Preserve project is the City's next opportunity to implement the Parks, Natural Open Space / Greenway and Trail System Plan through the use of a conservation development. Staff have worked with the developer to pursuit our public values and conservation development goals. The project includes restoration and preservation of quality wetlands and upland areas, and fills in one more piece of the greenway vision. A planned unit development (PUD) is being used on this project because standard zoning requirements do not accommodate the natural features and the restoration plan. As with the Foxborough (Fox Den Acres) project, the discussions have centered not on the question "what is the best design ?" rather than "does this meet all the mathematical zoning requirements ?" The project will require some MUSA, rezoning to planned unit development, and the approval of a PUD development stage plan/preliminary plat. This report discusses the submitted design. It is important to note that some specific elements of the project will change from what has been submitted. This is the nature of a PUD — especially a conservation development —as it goes through the review process. Staff has been working with this developer's team for the past year, and we now are at the point where we all needed to have plans created in order to examine the specifics. It is no surprise that changes will be needed, but the developer and his consultants have assembled what is a basically sound project. We all are now reviewing the feasibility of specific elements. • The Preserve, page 2 ANALYSIS The site consists of two parcels, both under the same ownershipThe southern parcel, which is all wetland except along the edge of Holly Drive, will not be developed. All proposed development is on the northern parcel. The northern parcel currently is split by the MUSA and zoning line. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site vacant Low Density Sewered Resid. and Low Density Unsewered Resid. R -1 and Rural North single family resid. and large City pond Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 South wetland Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural East City park and single family resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1X Planned Development West vacant Low Density Sewered Resid. and Low Density Unsewered Resid. R -1 and Rural The comprehensive plan guides the northern parcel for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. The northern part of this northern parcel, approximately 850 feet or 2/3, is within the existing MUSA and currently is zoned R -1. Two public streets and municipal water and sanitary sewer are stubbed to the site. This site has been guided and zoned for development for many years prior to the current comprehensive plan adopted in 2002: as far back as the 1987 comprehensive plan. The following is a summary of the of the proposal's density: Gross Site Area 52.6 acres Upland Area 15.0 acres Total Lots 31 Gross Density 0.6 units /acre Net Density 2.1 units /acre The proposed density complies with Low Density Sewered Residential: up to 3 units /acre. The project requires 3.25 acres of MUSA to include the area not currently within the MUSA: Block 4, most of Block 5, and part of the road. The project also requires rezoning to planned unit development. 1 The Preserve, page 3 Growth Management: As a conservation development, this project is not subject to the annual growth limits on the number of units, as stated in Ordinance 24 -04. Most of the site's developable land is already within the current MUSA, though 3.25 acres is needed. We have ample MUSA reserve to accommodate this small amount. Conservation Development: Ordinance 24 -04 amends the growth management policy to encourage conservation development by allowing a conservation development project to exceed the annual growth limits if it results in public values above those achievable under conventional development. The public values in the ordinance include but are not limited to the following: a. Preserving more natural open space than required under current ordinances and development policies The site includes over 37 acres of wetland, about 71 % of the total property. Only 5930 sf of wetland fill is proposed. The proposal includes a conservation plan that will restore and enhance large areas of the wetlands and other open space.. b. Reducing the extent of impervious surfaces and size of the development footprint Compared to standard development, road pavement will be narrower and front setbacks reduced. This allows for house pads to be farther from wetlands. c. Restoring /enhancing ecological systems on the site as part of the development process The project design and a management plan include: • preserving and protecting wet prairie remnants • restoring native vegetation of wetlands • removing invasive vegetation and invasive species • re- introducing diverse, native species to wetlands • minimizing impacts to wetlands and significant trees (as identified in tree inventory) • tree replacement to compensate for loss of hardwoods • upland buffers: removing invasive species and planting native species • serious effort to avoid significant natural features such as rare plant populations, rare natural community remnants when designing lots and pads d. Protecting off -site ecological systems through increased buffering The wetlands form a large buffer from lands to the east and south The restoration and management plan for this project includes removing invasive species and planting and management of native species. e. Ensuring long -term natural resource stewardship through an endowment program sponsored by the developer The project includes a stewardship plan that includes an endowment. The financial details have yet to be finalized. f. Providing public park and trail opportunities consistent with or in excess of the System Plan g. The Preserve, page 4 The project includes a trail within the open space areas and along the road to provide access to Birch Park.. Managing stormwater (flow rates and quality) using natural infiltration and ecologically - based approaches The project includes natural infiltration as part of the design. The `treatment train' approach includes swales, rain gardens, and infiltration ponds. This will improve water quality on and off site. In addition, improving the wetlands through restoration of native vegetation will contribute to better water quality. h. Preserving the open space aesthetic to which community residences have become accustomed The project design minimizes impacts on wetlands and actually improves the wetlands, which will be protected with a management plan. i. Maintaining natural buffer between established and new developments. The large wetlands along the eastern part of the site will remain as and open space buffer for existing development. In addition to the specific activities described in the restoration and management plan, this site is a piece of a wetland greenway system. This wetland complex continues south and west for over a mile, and east for a similar distance. These wetlands are part of a large watershed along County Ditch 25, which drains a significant portion of south central Lino Lakes. It is the same complex that covers parts of the Foxborough project, which incorporated many conservation development elements to restore and conserve the wetlands. This ditch and wetland system has been identified as a high value ecological area. The Foxborough project was the first conservation development project because it was designed to accommodate and enhance this ecological system. The Integra development can be the next piece in this larger picture. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT PUD: Conservation development design considers the conservation goals more important than mathematical standards found in a zoning ordinance. A planned development provides the flexibility needed in order to implement conservation development. Section 2, Subd. 10.A. of the zoning ordinance discusses the purpose of a planned unit development (PUD). In addition, Subd. 10.D. lists the purposes of an urban PUD. The application should be compared to these purposes. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for the grouping of lots or buildings for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development. This section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of lots, buildings and activities, which promote the goals outlined in the Comprehensive Plan or serve another public purpose. It is further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central • The Preserve, page 5 management, integrated planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance of parking, open space and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses. The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage: 1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. 6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations. Urban PUD Purposes: a. Preservation of wildlife habitat and unique natural resources. b. Reduction of negative impacts on the environment. c. Creation of common open space that provides a unified landscape for the use and enjoyment of the neighborhood community and /or the general public. d. A variety of urban residential lot sizes, configurations, and neighborhoods. Lots: The submittal includes 31 lots. In order to preserve as much open space as possible, lot dimensions have been adjusted. In much of the plat, the open space behind the lots extends for several hundred feet. The feeling of openness is greater, though the actual lot line depths will be less than a standard plat. Another means of increasing the common open space is the use of decreased setbacks. The front setbacks for most lost will be 25 feet from the right of way rather than the normal 30 feet. (Remember that the right of way included more land than the actual paved street.) Rear setbacks may also be reduced in order to retain conservation areas behind some lots. We did examine a `yield plan' that shows how the site could be developed under standard zoning. The number of lots hasn't been affected by using conservation development. • • • The Preserve, page 6 We are still working with the developer on the specifics of some lot boundaries to ensure all the conservation areas are protected. This likely will involve adjusting lot lines and easement boundaries. Streets, Access: The comprehensive plan for the community includes this site as an area to be developed. Two roads — Kildeer Drive and Pheasant Run —are stubbed to it in previous developments. Municipal water and sewer are stubbed in both streets. The proposed project would extend both of these roads to serve the two separate areas of the site. Pheasant Run would be planned to extend into the land to the west when that develops, creating an access to Old Birch St. Goals and policies of the comprehensive plan include a street system that connects rather than isolates neighborhoods. This serves to create a better sense of community and provides multiple access routes for emergency services. As currently proposed, the project would add 13 new homes on Kildeer Drive and 18 new homes on Pheasant Run. This will not overburden the roadways. When and if Pheasant Run extends west to the adjacent property, traffic generated by new development will go both directions. The right of way width for the internal streets is 50 feet. This is less than the normal 60 feet. The pavement width also is reduced to 28 feet rather than the standard 36 (face of curb to face of curb). These are two more ways of increasing the open space in the project: narrowing the rights of way allows for more open space behind the lots. The narrower pavement reduces impervious surface. The PUD standards specifically allow the pavement to be reduced in this way. Parking will be allowed on one side of the street only to ensure access by emergency vehicles. The plans include a temporary cul de sac at the western end of the Pheasant Run extension: on the abutting property. The developer is discussing an easement with that property owner to allow this. If those discussions are not successful, the cul de sac can be constructed on Lot 2, Block 5. When the property to the west is developed, the street would be extended, the cul de sac removed and vacated, and Lot 2 could be sold and built on. This will have to be decided before approval of the preliminary plat. Utilities: City water and sanitary sewer service will connect to existing facilities to the north. One "arm" of the project will connect to Kildeer Drive facilities, the other arm will connect to those in Pheasant Run. A water loop will connect the two, though the specific location of this loop has yet to be finalized. One extremely important aspect of this project is that the City needs a new well. The plat includes that site as Outlot A. This well site adjoins the existing Birch Park, the site listed for the well in the City's comprehensive water system plan. Outlot A would be deeded to the City as part of this project. Grading and Stormwater Management: The design includes infiltration methods that will help filter water prior to running into ponds or wetlands. r The Preserve, page 7 No increase in runoff rate is allowed. This is a standard requirement for all development which is enforced both the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City. The Watershed granted its preliminary approval in September 2005. Any changes to the plan must be acceptable to the Watershed District. Improving water quality is an important conservation development goal. The use of rain gardens and other methods for infiltration in this project will promote that goal. Parks, Open Space: The comprehensive plan broadly envisions a conceptual greenway in the area of this site. The City's "Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trails System Plan" further describes the area for conservation planning. Creating greenways to implement the concept presented in the comprehensive plan is the first priority of the parks and open space plan. This will require the use of a variety of strategies, the most important of which is greater reliance on a conservation development approach to land development. The preservation of open space on this site will be an important step in the implementation of the greenway vision. This is along the edge of a high value natural feature area that includes a major drainage through the southern part of Lino Lakes. A city trail would be created as part of the plat. The open space areas would be owned by the homeowners association and maintained as perpetual open space through a conservation easement over the area. A public trail easement also would wend through the open space area. The specific terms of the management plan implementation will require detailed legal agreements, which will be worked out prior to final • platting. REZONING TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Rezoning: Our ordinance includes two ways to use a PUD. One is a conditional use permit for a PUD, the other is a PUD rezoning. The conditional use permit option is not allowed in a single family zoning district, so a rezoning to PUD is needed for a conservation development. As stated in Section 2, Subdivision 1 of the zoning ordinance (the rezoning section), the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. The site is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. The comprehensive plan supports the greenway concept. The project implements the Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trails System Plan by creating a conservation development to provide an important segment of a larger greenway. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The Preserve, page 8 Single family residential development exists to the north, and development of this site would be an extension of that neighborhood. and east. Land to the west is guided for future development. Development cannot occur to the south due to extensive wetlands. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. By its very nature, a conservation development PUD creates a design tailored to the site itself. Specific performance standards are listed in the ordinance, but many are created with the project approval. The specific standards are evolving. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Utilities are immediately available on abutting property, as are the stubbed roads. Municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and sufficient capacity exists. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The existing roads have the capacity for the additional development. go ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD • The Environmental Board reviewed the project at its April 29 meeting. Generally, the Board recommends pursuing the conservation development approach on this site. Most of the specific recommendations have been part of the planning of the project since the start. Other specifics will be examined for feasibility as the project review continues. The Environmental Board recommendations are attached. OPTIONS 1. Approve the Rezone to Planned Unit Development, the Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, and the Allocation of MUSA Reserve as submitted. 2. Deny the application. 3. Continue the public hearing to the June 14 meeting to allow for additional revisions to the plan. RECOMMENDATION Option 3 1 SITE LOCATION J .$`T6. Tt' Birch Street K:E 0 REG LAND SURVEY NO 1 1 2 SITE R E tea t A tl LA c . e Foxborough Site PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN (detail) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • jiN1. Low Density ■ • Sewered Residential • • • • ■■ a MUSA line Foxborough site Low Density Unsewered Residential 1 • ZONING MAP (detail) Foxborough site to • PARK, GREENWAY, & TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN (detail) Foxborough s'te M r� t; net away System Park System \..turiti Rooftree Prr t t d Area Exttrtnit {.'.it} Aldo. OMB 'drutcrrtl RcKxtrer I:unue Nt.tg htx.rhuuJ Park ((:4,ntet Cunaetvatiun Arta i Extutng Sell; kits Open Wuxi Watt a,t Natural Min Existing County Parks Rota iurut Pu ∎ttsrt J Area) N:tturri RthAXir.e (4 rriJ4,r Enliamentont .Mr., r VKC .ArC'A) Trail System i1yt+ kinkine, Trail d\/ I'n,I, wxl l: Art t.tnking 1 ail #' Ls.erinx CAN Pottinuiern .ssti• Prop. ssed City tic-Atitwtn,n %1f Existing Regional I'&rls.Trail .' I'rutntxtxl Regional Park. Trail 2"lite Proposed Designated Bike Route CIT IN Memo Environmental To: Paul Bengtson From: Marty Asleson Date: May 3, 2006 Re: April 29, 2006 Environmental Board Recommendations The April 29, 2006 Environmental Board made the following recommendations: • Since it is in a Level 1 habitat area, and an important Greenway area it was recommended to pursue a Conservation Development. • It is important to look beyond the borders in design considerations to include connections between Foxburough and the Saddle Club property. • Developer should provide for increased public value as presented in the preliminary review of May 25, 2005. Provision of contiguous, restored and managed open space in the City Greenway would be most desirable. • Keep proposed 28 feet roads. • The proposed Conservation Easement should have acceptable documentation covering the Easement, tied to Covenants and Restricts ions of deed and homeowners association. The fees should be tied to the management requirements outlined in the proposed stewardship plan. • The plan should show roof -top water directed to grass areas of yards. Rain gardens, although hard to see (Attachment 9), are designed into the front of the eastern bank of houses. Recommend this design be carried over into the western cul -de -sac bank of houses. Curb cuts should collect water off the road surface and flow into the rain gardens. These rain gardens should be low maintenance types, have a garden appearance, and be similar to those gardens designed in the Maple Wood or • Page 1 • Burnsville retrofit garden models. Property owners were given a choice of planting type. The plants for these ponds, although encouraged to be, do not necessarily have to be native. Evaporative Control Systems could be an option for these gardens. These ponds should be separately funded from through storm water programming rather than restoration dollars. Infiltration Ponds and storm ponds and swales should be planted to native species in accordance with Critical Connections recommendations for restoration and management. All yard soils that will be planted with sod must have 4 inches of top soil thoroughly tilled into the soil before sodding. • A Storm Water Pollution Plan is different from an erosion control plan. Developers typically submit an Erosion Control Plan. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is a" living- breathing" document required under the Non -Point Discharge Elimination System requirements of the PCA. Stormwater management can change from day to day and the document should reflect anticipated and unanticipated events. An Erosion Control Plan typically has generic copy -paste text and pictures. A SWPPP gets very site specific. For instance, Attachments 6 and 7 talks about concrete truck cleanout areas. A SWPPP will locate a spot on the Map. The SWPPP needs to have a designated stormwater contact on the plan and a phone number that the person can be reached at. The SWPPP will address unforeseen events such as the need to dewater turbid site water. The SWPPP should define beforehand how this will be done so that polluted water does not leave the site. The Erosion Control Plan will clip -paste notes on rock entrances and the SWPPP will address who will replace /top dress rock filled with sediment. The SWPPP document must be in a designated place on site along with the required weekly and post rainfall event inspection sheets. A mailbox on the site marked SWPPP works best for the City. An acceptable SWPPP must be submitted to the City Environmental and Engineering for approval prior to ground breaking. • No import or export of soils w /out city approval • City lighting ordinance needs to be followed. Keep lighting and monument lighting to minimum. • Developer should submit an acceptable landscape plan. • Developer should look at using modified walkouts as much as possible in order to reduce fill placement. • Developer should have a document produced for homeowners to evidence Association and deed restrictions, and declaration of covenants. • Page 2 • • Remove shallow marsh restoration from the plan. • Acceptable signage should be placed at the conservation easement boundaries of each lot. • Storm Water Pollution Plan should have a name and a number placed on it for 7 days a week contact purposes. • Add one boulevard tree per frontage if there is room to do so. • Page 3 TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jatfray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: The Preserve Development Copies To: Preliminary Site Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Proj. No.: 13604.009 Date: May 5, 2006 Routing: The following preliminary site review is based on these submittals: 1. Site Development Plans, submitted by MFRA dated April 10, 2006. 2. Proposed Site Plan and Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan, submitted by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. dated April 10, 2006. 3. Preliminary Plat, submitted by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. dated dated April 10, 2006. 4. Preliminary Utility Plan, submitted by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. dated April 11, 2006. 5. Geotechnical Report submitted by Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc dated March 18, 2006 Street and Trail Comments: 1. This is a proposed Conservation Development, therefore a 50' R/W and 28' Face to Face street width is an acceptable variation from City Standards. 2. Trail system may be on the roadway and is acceptable. 3. A temporary cul -de -sac with adequate easement at the future Pheasant Run South extension to the Saddle Club must be shown within the property limits. 4. Street section increased to address soil conditions, but a final geotechnical report shall be provided for support. 5. Provide an updated typical street and trail section and show on plans. Show standard bituminous mix specifications. 6. Adjust curb and gutter to City Standard (D412). Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Comments: 1. Profiles must be provided to confirm crossing conflicts and adequate cover. 2. Details must be provided in conformance to City Standards. 3. Proposed service locations must be provided. 4. Watermain size and type must be shown on plan. 5. Additional gate valves are required along Pheasant Run South. 6. The watermain installed through the wetland area must be approved by the RCWD, and proposed stabilization and installation process must be provided. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity The Preserve Development Page 2 May 5, 2006 Preliminary Site Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 7. Adequate separation must be provided between tree and hydrant locations. 8. See attached letter from Centennial Fire District dated April 18, 2006 regarding the minimum hydrant spacing requirements. Storm Sewer and Drainage Comments: 1. Profiles of storm sewer must be provided. 2. Details must be provided in conformance with City Standards. 3. Access must be provided with adequate easement to the baffled weir and pond areas for maintenance. 4. 3'X6' Box Culvert separation from utilities must be addressed across Pheasant Run South. 5. See attached TKDA Preliminary Drainage Review dated May 5, 2006 for additional comments to be addressed. Additional Comments: 1. A final geotechnical report should be provided to provide site preparation, fill placement, roadway design, and foundation recommendations as well as any settlement estimates. OHWL must be provided for the wetland adjacent to Outlot A, so that standard well setbacks can be confirmed. 2. 3. All trail and utility easements must be located on plan. 4. Legend must be shown on Grading Plan to describe building pad terms. 5. Proposed driveway locations must be shown. 6. Retaining wall design with calculations must be provided for walls greater than 4 feet in height. 7. All necessary permits must be provided to the City. • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Reference: The Preserve Development Copies To: Preliminary Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Proj. No.: 13604.009 Date: May 5, 2006 Routing: The following preliminary drainage review is based on these submittals: 1. Proposed Site Plan and Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan, submitted by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. dated April 10, 2006. 2. Geotechnical Report submitted by Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc dated March 18, 2006 3. Stormwater Management Report submitted by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. dated September 2, 2005. Preliminary Drainage Review Comments: 1. The preliminary geotechnical report concludes that ground water is found between 0 feet to 8.4 feet and has potential to fluctuate upward as much as 3.5 feet to 4.25 feet. It may be difficult to maintain groundwater separation from the storm sewer. Alternative solutions must be provided to maintain groundwater separation. 2. The City suggests locating roadway low points to provide emergency overflow routes along side property lines. 3. Locate storm sewer on Killdeer Drive in the road right -of -way. 4. A 16.5 foot average wetland buffer of native wetland /prairie vegetation is recommended from the delineated wetland edge to the lawn areas. 5. Show all storm sewer and pond easements on the plan. 6. It appears that the existing wetland high water level indicated on the plan does not include the wetland to the east of Pheasant Run South. Please clarify. 7. Indicate the emergency overflow elevation and location of the existing wetlands and pond on the plan. 8. Low floor elevations for lots located on Pheasant Run South are required to be a minimum of 2 feet above the 100 -year elevation of the existing wetland. 9. Provide storm sewer calculations and a storm sewer schedule for review. 10. Revised plans will need to be resubmitted to RCWD for approval, and documentation provided to the City. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • • The Preserve Conservation Development Restoration and Management Plan for Conservation Areas Lino Lakes, Minnesota Prepared By: Prepared For: Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc. 14758 Ostlund Trail North Marine on St. Croix, MN 55047 April 10, 2006 Integra Homes 12721 Overlook Road Dayton, Minnesota 55307 • • • IV. Restoration and Management Needs and Recommendations Restoration and Management Goals and Objectives • Restore, manage, and improve pre- existing moderate and low quality natural communities and natural resources within the conservation areas; • Re- establish and /or restore native vegetation cover within highly disturbed and non- native landscape areas within the conservation areas that is ecologically appropriate and suited to the environmental conditions of the site and is suitable to proposed human uses and desired site aesthetics; • Re- establish prescribed fire as a management tool onsite; • Protect and manage existing endangered plant populations; • Establish conservation signage (and other infrastructure) that help facilitate sustainable natural resource management and other programmed activities. • Provide recreational and educational opportunities for the residents of The Preserve and that are compatible with sustaining, restoring, and improving the natural vegetation and ecological functions of the conservation areas; • Implement surface water and public infrastructure planning and development within the site and adjacent landscape that compliments (and does not further degrade) the natural resources of the site (Use of alternative stormwater management techniques); and • Create required wetland mitigation basin in northeast corner of site, establishing appropriate native species cover and hydrology (wet meadow, wet prairie, emergent marsh). Prescribed Native Plant Communities Much of the existing vegetation of the conservation areas is currently in a moderate to low quality natural condition or degraded semi - natural condition. All natural areas within the designated conservation areas will require considerable resources to restore and /or manage vegetation as natural plant communities well into the future. Furthermore, areas of very disturbed semi - natural vegetation and non - native cover (i.e. degraded wet meadows, degraded shrub swamp, degraded emergent marsh etc.), will require restoration tasks such as invasive and exotic vegetation removal, chemical and manual treatments and /or biological controls of noxious weed species, and replanting/reseeding with native plant community cover. To minimize the resources require for restoring and managing native vegetation within the conservation areas, pre- existing natural communities will not be converted to other natural community types. Figure - 6 illustrates the location and extent of prescribed natural and semi - natural vegetation types within the conservation areas. Rather, existing natural communities will be managed, improved, and augmented with appropriate native species seed mixes and plantings when necessary. The following are detailed descriptions of natural community types (wet meadow, shallow /mixed emergent marsh, wet prairie, dry prairie /oak savanna, and oak forest) that have been prescribed for the conservation areas, as depicted in Figure 6. Native species list appropriate for re- seeding, planting, and re- establishing natural communities that are specified in the following text are provided in Appendix C. The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 12 Legend: OW Oak Woodland AW Aspen Woodland WP Wet Prairie OS Oak Savanna MEM Mixed Emergent Marsh WM Wet Meadow SS Shrub Sbvarnp IP Infiltration Pond WMT Wetland Mitigation Conservation Easements and Outlots Residential Lot Lines 250 0 250 500 Feet (' ) Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc The Preserve Conservation Development Conservation Area Restoration and Management Plan T31N R22W Sections 28 and 33 Lino Lakes, Minnesota Figure 6 The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 13 • • • V. Restoration and Management Tasks and Timeline The natural resource restoration and management recommendations contained within this section are divided into three sections: Pre - Construction Management Activities, Phase 1 Restoration and Site Recovery, and Phase 2 Maintenance and Adaptive Management. Pre - construction tasks were completed prior to or during site grading in spring 2005, to capitalize on time - sensitive natural resource conservation opportunities that would have otherwise been lost during site construction. Phase 1 includes natural resource restoration and management tasks designed to address the major ecological problems on the site, restore native vegetation to non - native landscapes, and improve the ecological structure and function of pre- existing natural community remnants. Phase 2 includes management and maintenance tasks that maintain the ecological structure and function of the site through time, and that adapt restoration and management prescriptions based on the ecological response of restoration areas following initial restoration treatments. Phase 1— Site Recovery and Restoration: Years 1- 5 The activities listed in' Phase 1 are particularly critical to the first five years of site restoration and management. Changes in resource management prescriptions and implemented tasks during this time period should be reviewed by professional ecologists and project stakeholders to ensure that they are integrated and in agreement with other ongoing and proposed management tasks, and contribute to the overall quality of the site. Phase 1 Restoration and Management Priorities (Summary timeline provided in Appendix A): 1) Salvage local- ecotype native forest wildflowers, ferns, and sedges from oak forest areas that are proposed for development (prior to grading), transplanting in forested (oak) conservation areas; 2) Control, remove, and manage invasive species — Reed canary grass and common buckthorn. Reed canary grass within wetlands (and upland margins) and common buckthorn within forests and woodlands are the most problematic species present on the site, and their management should be of the utmost priority; • Less than 20% cover of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) within restored and managed wetlands within the conservation area, • Less than 40% cover of invasive cattail (Typha angustifolia and T. x glauca) in semi - permanently and permanently flooded wetland types. • Less than 5% cover of common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) in upland and wetland areas. 3) Thin and manage quaking aspen along wetland /forest transitions; 4) Restoration of native plant communities currently dominated by native, non - invasive vegetation appropriate to the site; 5) Re- introduction of natural disturbance regimes (such as prescribed fire) that restore and maintain highly functioning natural systems; 6) Establish native species cover within wetland mitigation area, and monitor establishment of vegetation and hydrology within wetland mitigation area; 7) Monitor rare plant populations; The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 20 8) Monitor the site's response to initial restoration and management treatments, and refine management approach and methods as needed; and 9) Install conservation area (outlot) boundary markers and interpretive signage that clearly defines the boundaries of the conservation area. Year One (May 1 through December 31, 2006) Restoration and Management Tasks • Salvage local- ecotype native forest wildflowers, ferns, and sedges from oak forest areas that are proposed for development (prior to grading), transplanting in forested (oak) conservation areas during the second quarter of the year; • Reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Glyphosate in the fall (third quarters and fourth), so that the herbicide is translocated into the root systems. Monotypes of reed canary grass will be treated with a boom sprayer. Small patches of reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicides, to minimize impacts to associated native grasses and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary grass will be accomplished with a backpack sprayer to limit /eliminate overspray; • Common buckthorn will be cut and the biomass removed from the site. Following cutting, stumps will be treated with Glyphosate to control re- sprouting. Cutting will be accomplished with chainsaws and brush cutters (during the second and third quarter of the year; • Quaking aspen along wetland/forest transitions will be thinned and managed during the second and third quarters of the year; • The wetland mitigation and infiltration areas will be seeded in the fourth quarter of the year; • Residential rainwater gardens will be seeded in the second and third quarters of the year; • Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second and third quarters of the year; and • Conservation area boundary markers and interpretive signage will be installed during the second or third quarter of the year; Year Two (January 1 through December 31, 2007) Restoration and Management Tasks • Salvage local- ecotype native forest wildflowers, ferns, and sedges from oak forest areas that are proposed for development (prior to grading), transplanting in forested (oak) conservation areas during the second quarter of the year; • Reed canary grass -will be chemically treated with Glyphosate in the fall (third quarter and fourth), so that the herbicide is translocated into the root systems. Monotypes of reed canary grass will be treated with a boom sprayer. Small patches of reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicides, to minimize impacts to associated native grasses and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary grass will be accomplished with a backpack sprayer to limit/eliminate overspray; • Cattail monotypes will be mowed and de- thatched in the first quarter of year two (during frozen conditions) and chemically treated with Glyphosate in the spring and /or fall. Cattail biomass will be removed from the site and composted and /or burned; The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 21 • • • Common buckthorn will be cut and the biomass removed from the site. Following cutting, stumps will be treated with Glyphosate to control re- sprouting. Cutting will be accomplished with chainsaws and brush cutters (during the first and second quarters of the year; • Quaking aspen along wetland /forest transitions will be thinned and managed during the first and second quarters of the year; • Quaking aspen resprouts will be treated in the first and fourth quarters of the year; • Prescribed burn plans will be written and burn permits will be acquired in the first quarter of the year; • Prescribed burning plan will be implemented in the early second quarter of year two (i.e. April and May); • The wetland mitigation and infiltration areas will be seeded in the fourth quarter of the year; • Residential rainwater gardens will be seeded in the second and third quarters of the year; • Existing degraded native communities will be seeded with appropriate native seed mix during the second and third quarters of the year; • Wetland mitigation areas will be monitored during second through fourth quarters of the year; • Reseeded degraded native communities will be monitored during the second through fourth quarters of the year; • Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second and third quarters of the year; • Conservation area boundary markers and interpretive signage will be installed during the second or third quarter of the year; and • A wetland mitigation monitoring report will be completed during the fourth quarter of the year. Year Three (January 1 through December 31, 2008) Restoration and Management Tasks • Reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Glyphosate in the fall (third quarter and fourth), so that the herbicide is translocated into the root systems. Monotypes of reed canary grass will be treated with a boom sprayer. Small patches of reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicides, to minimize impacts to associated native grasses and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary grass will be accomplished with a backpack sprayer to limit /eliminate overspray; • Cattail monotypes will be mowed and de- thatched in the first quarter of year two (during frozen conditions) and chemically treated with Glyphosate in the spring and /or fall. Cattail biomass will be removed from the site and composted and /or burned; • Common buckthorn will be cut and the biomass removed from the site. Following cutting, stumps will be treated with Glyphosate to control re- sprouting. Cutting will be accomplished with chainsaws and brush cutters (during the first and second quarters of the year; • Quaking aspen resprouts will be treated in the first and fourth quarters of the year; • Prescribed burn plans will be written and burn permits will be acquired in the first quarter of the year; The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 22 • Prescribed burning plan will be implemented in the early second quarter of year two (i.e. April and May); • Existing degraded native communities will be seeded with appropriate native seed mix during the third and fourth quarters of the year; • Wetland mitigation areas will be monitored during second through fourth quarters of the year; • Reseeded degraded native communities will be monitored during the second through fourth quarters of the year; • Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second and third quarters of the year; and • A wetland mitigation monitoring report will be completed during the fourth quarter of the year. Year Four (January 1 through December 31, 2009) Restoration and Management Tasks • Reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Glyphosate in the fall (third quarter and fourth), so that the herbicide is translocated into the root systems. Monotypes of reed canary grass will be treated with a boom sprayer. Small patches of reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicides, to minimize impacts to associated native grasses and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary grass will be accomplished with a backpack sprayer to limit /eliminate overspray; • Cattail monotypes will be mowed and de- thatched in the first quarter of year two (during frozen conditions) and chemically treated with Glyphosate in the spring and /or fall. Cattail biomass will be removed from the site and composted and /or burned; • Quaking aspen resprouts will be treated in the first and fourth quarters of the year; • Existing degraded native communities will be seeded with appropriate native seed mix during the third and fourth quarters of the year; • Wetland mitigation areas will be monitored during second through fourth quarters of the year; • Reseeded degraded native communities will be monitored during the second through fourth quarters of the year; • Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second and third quarters of the year; and • A wetland mitigation monitoring report will be completed during the fourth quarter of the year. Year Five (January 1 through December 31, 2010) Restoration and Management Tasks • Reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Glyphosate in the fall (third quarter and fourth), so that the herbicide is translocated into the root systems. Monotypes of reed canary grass will be treated with a boom sprayer. Small patches of reed canary grass will be chemically treated with Sethoxydim grass - specific herbicides, to minimize impacts to associated native grasses and forbs. Spot treatment of reed canary grass will be accomplished with a backpack sprayer to limit/eliminate overspray; The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 23 • • • • Cattail monotypes will be mowed and de- thatched in the first quarter of year two (during frozen conditions) and chemically treated with Glyphosate in the spring and /or fall. Cattail biomass will be removed from the site and composted and /or burned; • Quaking aspen resprouts will be treated in the first and fourth quarters of the year; • Prescribed bum plans will be written and burn permits will be acquired in the first quarter of the year; • Prescribed burning plan will be implemented in the early second quarter of year two (i.e. April and May); • Wetland mitigation areas will be monitored during second through fourth quarters of the year; • Re- seeded native communities will be monitored during the second through fourth quarters of the year; • Known locations of endangered plant populations will be monitored during the second and third quarters of the year; and • A wetland mitigation monitoring report will be completed during the fourth quarter of the year. Year Six (January 1 through December 31, 2011) • Wetland mitigation areas will be monitored during second through fourth quarters of the year; • Reseeded degraded native communities will be monitored during the second through fourth quarters of the year; • A wetland mitigation monitoring report will be completed during the fourth quarter of the year; and • A long -term management plan will be completed during the first and second quarters of year six. Phase 2 — Maintenance and Management: Years 5 -10+ 1) Monitoring and spot treatment of invasive species populations and effectiveness of management practices; 2) Prescribed burning of wetlands, dry prairie /savannas, and oak/aspen woodland edges; 3) Monitoring of restoration successes and failures, vegetation diversity, and wildlife use; 4) Monitoring and resolution of residential encroachment into conservation areas, unauthorized uses of conservation areas, and negative impacts associated with trail use and maintenance; and 5) Coordination among The Preserve's Homeowners Association, the City of Lino Lakes, the project ecologist, and other project stakeholders to update management plan and priorities, and allocated restoration and management resources. The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 24 • Invasive Species Management Invasive species are clearly the most urgent management priority at The Preserve. Although invasive species have established on the site, there is ample time to manage the relatively concentrated populations of these species before they are able to spread further. However, if invasive exotic species are left unchecked and untreated, they will continue to invade, establish, and further degrade the remaining moderate quality natural vegetation within five to ten years time. Once established as reproductive populations, natural community restoration and management will be significantly more difficult and expensive within The Preserve's conservation areas. Common and Glossy Buckthorn Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) and Glossy Buckthorn (R. frangula) are European shrubs that invade and establish within native forest and woodland understories in Minnesota. Once Buckthorn establishes within natural communities, it can out - compete most native species. Common Buckthorn was observed in various densities throughout the forest and woodlands of The Preserve. Glossy Buckthorn prefers wetland habitats, and was observed in very limited numbers along wetland edges within the site. Removal and management of Buckthorn can be a labor intensive and costly undertaking. A long -term plan will likely be necessary to perpetually monitor and manage these species. The first phase of managing Buckthorn includes locating and removing all mature, fruit producing individuals, as to minimize seed dispersal and invasion. Seed producing plants are most commonly found along sunny woodland edges, rather than in woodland or forest interiors. The next phase of removal should include the removal of saplings and seedlings. When samplings and seedlings are removed, native shrub and herbaceous specious should be planted to reduce the risk of erosion, soil loss, and reinvasion of buckthorn and other undesirable species. CCES also recommends coordination with landowners adjacent to The Preserve development, to secure permission to remove and treat buckthorn along adjacent property boundaries, where feasible. Replanting of native species on adjacent residential lands should be considered. Reed Canary Grass Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) is an invasive wetland grass that is very common to degraded wetlands within the Minneapolis /Saint Paul metropolitan area and throughout Minnesota. Reed Canary Grass is considered native to North America, but this species has been hybridized and cultivated as an aggressive and naturalizing forage grass that is also used erosion control in agricultural landscapes. Reed Canary Grass is pervasive in all wetlands and in upland edges of The Preserve's conservation areas. CCES recommends prompt management and treatment of Reed Canary Grass beginning in fall of 2005. Reed Canary Grass can be effectively managed with a grass - specific herbicide (Vantage) or non - specific herbicides (Rodeo and Round -Up), prescribed burning, and manual, removal (where feasible). The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 25 Spotted Knapweed Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea maculata) is an invasive weed from Eurasia, often colonizing in degraded sunny uplands, fallow agricultural fields, and remnant prairies. Spotted Knapweed was observed as scattered individuals throughout the old fields of The Preserve. This relatively sparse distribution suggests that immediate removal and treatment of this species would be very cost effective. In time, this species will become much more problematic within open grasslands, and will be much more difficult and expensive to remove and manage. Spotted Knapweed is best removed with a standard pitchfork, or spot treated with a Glyphosate -based herbicide (such as Round -Up). When manually removing these plants, it is very important to remove the entire root system and basal rosette of leaves. Herbicide treatments of Spotted Knapweed often require several repeated applications to completely eradicate an established population. Surface Runoff Management and Erosion Control Stormwater runoff and erosion control systems should remain in place and in working order throughout the development of residential lots and construction of homes at The Preserve. Regular scheduled monitoring and repair of these systems will significantly contribute to the overall success of the restoration of The Preserve's conservation areas, especially within wetlands. Erosion control structures and silt fences should be maintained along the conservation area boundaries until perennial vegetation is established within the adjacent residential lots. Once perennial vegetation has established, silt fences should be completely removed from the site and discarded. Maintain and Restore Soil Porosity in Developed Uplands Site grading and development of the residential lots at The Preserve will likely result in the pronounced compaction of surficial soil layers and reduced soil porosity within residential yards and conservation areas edges. CCES and the City of Lino Lakes recommend that prior to final landscaping of residential yards and installation of turf grass, sod, and other landscape plantings, compacted soil surfaces (upper 6 to 12 inches) of residential yards and edges of conservation areas should be roto - tilled and mixed with subsurface and topsoil layers to restore overall soil porosity and deep root establishment. Preparation of soils in this manner will increase overall soil porosity and stormwater infiltration, help to stabilize post- construction site hydrology, improve turf grass establishment, and reduce stormwater runoff and chemical runoff into the adjacent conservation areas. The City of Lino Lakes, Integra Homes, and the consulting ecologist should work with individual home builders, landscape contractors, and homeowners to ensure that this important site preparation step is accomplished on a lot by lot basis. The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 26 • • • Vegetation Establishment in Stormwater and Infiltration Ponds Stormwater treatment ponds within The Preserve's conservation areas have been excavated and rough graded during the initial site grading process in spring and summer of 2005. Water control structures, such as inlet and outlet pipes and weirs where installed prior to the initial grading of each stormwater basin. As required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, silt fences have been installed along all edges of stormwater basins to minimize sedimentation of these basins or erosion of sediment into the surrounding conservation areas or off site wetlands. Stormwater treatment ponds will be final graded during the final phases of the overall site grading. Stormwater treatment ponds within the conservation area should be seeded and maintained as natural or semi - natural wetlands that compliment the surrounding natural communities within the conservation area. Therefore, only native, non - invasive plant species should be seeded into stormwater ponds. Native plant species that can tolerate fluctuating water levels and increased sediments, salt, and nutrients should be selected for each basin, and native seed mixes should be tailored to the design hydrology, soils, side slope profiles, and topographic configurations of each stormwater treatment pond. VI. Socio- Cultural Considerations and Recommendations Signage Along Conservation Area /Residential Lot Boundaries Integra Homes will install and The Preserve's Homeowner Association will maintain, repair and, if necessary, replace the signage, which is placed within the conservation area. Wherever possible and reasonable, conservation area signage will be installed during the initial land development phase of The Preserve Conservation Development (Spring /Summer of 2006 or Spring /Summer of 2007). Integra Homes will post up signs along rear lot lines and lot corners that adjoin the conservation easements and /or outlots. Signage will also be placed in other locations within the conservation area, as determined as necessary by the Integra Homes and the City of Lino Lakes. The residential owner of each lot adjacent to the conservation area may not remove, alter or damage the signs. Conservation area signage should be designed to be easily recognizable, durable, and resistant damage by prescribed burning and other stresses associated with restoration and management of the conservation areas. Signage should be tall enough (at least 3 to 4 feet) to stand above native perennial prairie grasses and low shrubs, taking into account the height of mature restored native vegetation within each conservation area. Trails A public pedestrian trail has been planned within upland and wetland portions of the conservation areas and along the residential streetscape. The trail easement and infrastructure will be owned and maintained by the City of Lino Lakes. Figure 7 illustrates the proposed alignment of this trail corridor. Native and non - invasive plant species should be seeded and established along the trail corridor following trail construction, consistent with the natural communities the trail transects. Monitoring and management of problematic weed establishment along the trail corridor should be conducted on an annual basis, as weed seeds are likely to be introduced by trail users along the trail corridor. Although the trail may be cleared of snow by plowing or shoveling, road salt and sand should not be used to manage snow or ice within the conservation areas. The Preserve Conservation Development - Restoration and Management Plan 27 LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR 1210 EXISTING WETLAND LIMITS sr,MAi - - EXISTING STORM SEWER OSAN A/11 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER O B' < EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE & HYDRANT EXISTING GAS MAIN = = EXISTING ELECTRIC -- -- EXISTING CURB UNE -- EXISTING TREE UNE' DEUNEATEO WETLAND THE SUBSURFACE UTIUTY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PUNS 15 A UTILITY OUAUTY LEVEL 0. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETER /WED ACCORDING 70 ME GUIDEUNES OF CIIASCE 30 -02. TITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTIUTY DATA.' THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EASING UT91T1ES BEFORE COMMENCING WORN, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, MACH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTUTIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD) IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WLTMN THE SITE HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER MIN THE LOCATION, SIZE. INVERT AND IF THE TILE UNE I5 ACTIVE. NO ACTIVE DRAW TIE SHALL BE BACKRUID WMOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. x�9 OW i I / I 1 i 74.3G_ x.• EDGE -OF NETLdND r' TOP of SEWFALE OF 0A19804 1005) xOi U P • 4/ L_I \ 1 mi l \. '_/I V NW1- 093.5. /i g92J /♦ xyi.e NJ { SULAM -- / - - -- • •- K.OET *M11 ME A 1- lr-N I 1 ,/1 I\ I — TLJL-' I 1 IlJI V 9 _ 4, A N /x-092 ■ �1 7 FLOODPLMN PER \ /�•� RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT OF YETLAMD_----- o, / / \ / O / g/_ // '' — ..., — %� Y \\ / / \ / r /l J 1 WFRAND r -- — c 1`, Y / — / 1'- FAFKONIUIE �iE4 WIE C r ", ,,E... \AL 6 1___ _i__ -r -EDGE OF WETLAND--,, .0' �a9+s ROLL 0 w C) 111 Y C, 100 SCALE IN FEET 200 0 SHEET NUMBER C.2.01 REV. MFRA FILE Y 15269 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and that part of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter all in Section 28, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except GEMINI ESTATES and TRAPPERS CROSSING according to the recorded plats thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota; also except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said quarter - quarter; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along the north line thereof 360 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north line 388.48 feet; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West 345 feet; thence South 21 degrees 12 minutes East 166.94 feet; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 320 feet; thence North 0 degrees 22 minutes 58 seconds East 475 feet to the point of beginning; and also except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said quarter - quarter; thence South 0 degrees 33 minutes 07 seconds West along the east line thereof 170.04 feet to Point "A "; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 418.54 feet; thence North 22 degrees 30 minutes East 183.38 feet to the north line of said quarter - quarter; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East along said north line 350 feet to the point of beginning; and also except that part of said quarter - quarter described as follows: Beginning at said Point "A "; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West 272.96 feet; thence South 22 degrees 30 minutes West 223.24 feet; thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds East parallel with the north line of said quarter - quarter 356.42 feet, more or less, to the east line of said quarter - quarter; thence North 0 degrees 33 minutes 07 seconds East along said east line 207 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, except that part thereof taken for road purposes. AND That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying northwest of the west right -of -way line of Holly Drive. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY AREAS GROSS SITE AREA= LESS R/W= NET SITE AREA TOTAL UPLAND AREA= LOT SUMMARY NUMBER OF LOTS= AVERAGE LOT SIZE= MINIMUM LOT SIZE= MAXIMUM LOT SIZE= DENSITY PROPOSED DENSITY (GROSS AREA) PROPOSED DENSITY (NET AREA) DEVELOPMENT NOTES 52.56 acres 2.60 acres 49.96 acres 14.97 acres 31 0.30 acres 0.22 acres 0.61 acres 1.70 UNITS PER ACRE 1.61 UNITS PER ACRE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER ALL OF OUTLOTS A, B, AND C. 200 0 CC; CD n_ SCALE IN FEET 200 W > (/ i__- w< W Y ix CC a CC Z d. o (Dm w F- W = Z a I- LIN V Z 0 Q 0 C.3.01 C INFRA FILE # 15269 IY r, 60 I c� S89°2* '30"E ED)- S89 °49'18" 360 00 (MEAS) _ r-L)i7\/,' ^nn / L_1 \l�r\�:UI v N w 0 w O 0 w N o I 60 /;.S89 °49'18 "W 2 6.82- i��._ Lt/ ON 4 ' o �f 0 � °D O N 89°419"W 145.58 t O (5 o<J=a' Q N89 °29'30 "W (DEED) _S.89 °49'18 "W 320.00 (MEAS 0 0 z N �Q d o >\ oM cv co S89 °29'30 "E '19""W 160 CONSEVATION EASEMENT - - -1 TYP.) °-- -100 1R FLOOD PLAIN (PER RCM)) ...' EDGE OF WETLAND - -- -- - — T �It / 3: •.42 (DEED) •56.40 (MEAS) 3 1 APR 2 6 2006 INSET A 60 C LAKES 0 60 SCALE IN FEET w 0-zw< w�oa WW CC a Q 0_ °z 0 LLI= Z a. f— 9 0 a c E Ul 2 00 0 0 4 1 SHEET NUMBER C.3.02 REV. C YFRA FILE 0 152E0 -900- / 1 / / / \ \\ \ \_ /.. /i // //. / / / / I/� \\ \ -- �/ / /; // /�• / / 1 � - / /� /// % /� // 1 -N`� / / /1/1/1/1 / / I - / // • // / // // / /awe- r - -" / ; / / / / 1 / / / / / 1 I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /// // I I 1 1 / / / / 1 / / / / / I 1,/ // 1 / 1 / / / 1 '1 / i / 1 EXISTING POND (POND 117 , I / / 11M.-893.0 1 / / 1� / 1 1 ( I I ¢EW) 1 I I; I i I I 1 1 1 1 1 5 - 8046.1 ; 11 \1 11 \ II ) • - - -- \\ \\ \ `\ \` \\ 1 \ \ / 4,z: 9313.81 _ ) \ 1 1 8'•'.'8940` ---___././ 1 \ 1Tw.9961LT -- \ \ IL `T Qr_ 893.0 \ &. 93.0 , � , , ,....... ,,............ 11: Ft oavvcG11111 62- } -sot RANW9901 (SR 0000 LEGEND EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WETLANDS PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL FENCE PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER OVERFLOW ELEVATION WO -YEAR FL000PLAIN FILL BELOW 892.1 TOTAL FILL 1,757 YOS 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN MITIGATION TOTAL MITIGATION= 1,782 YDS 000 0.10 TAM 93 911X101 a.MlS NN6 110110 TO 0001[ RI MS f11YAn0 ,1111 I a 1800511 0)5 1 fa w.OaR Taal 5889 I•a,O /MIL CAME . sAam. rN 51008 5 s15 060.61101MA 0080!00 COMMIS an r 0500 0580 CM/ALwa sTacMY 11070.1. A9L - 93.0 51892 INV -ml.m 0) I =896.0 /•/ Br: I , Bw:89 0 ��1 -894.0 1 B1- 893.0, IT 7 4466' -- B,r_ 692. I 7 Tx•893.0--/ 8r -8920.. _ / j .ITw;694A 11 Br: 992. - -_ -7 :096.01 8024 92.1; itrinibi AIIL - - - - - .:895.0 Br:891_O .1 1501/* 1697.0 I / Bw:8'10.0 1AL Y. f .OZ atNiiiM / 1 1 INY -009. ( / u1v.m1.M ([ / I r, IENH•771392 0,0 - - - 1 ` I / iTw- 896.0 I I i ,,p 9rr -895. di$1 / Y A I1 / Al11A� ♦� ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ _/ ' - - -95 I / / I� ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦•� ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ POND 4PA1� INF)l AnON BA -•, 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦�i ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ I BUT -991 ♦♦" ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦i • tar CUTLET9 9999yyyyS ,_._♦ ♦ ♦♦,,_4' .♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦� ♦ ♦ ♦4, . TOP gF 155 713, I ♦♦.♦,♦ i♦♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦� ♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦� y1PONO N IL *****•• . ♦♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ =1895 ; ♦♦♦♦bd♦♦♦♦. ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.. ter♦• ♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦A • / � iii ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦♦4i i♦ ii ♦i i ♦i:i:i:i ♦iii ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i ♦i 1148♦ 1♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ v♦♦♦ A�•♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦A ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦� • elStI .fr40/ ♦ ♦ ♦♦4I PROXIMATE SH ALLOW �.♦.♦.♦.♦.♦♦i *, : ;• ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • MARSH RESTORATION i�♦� ♦Oi ♦ii••••4: • AREA (DESIGN BY ♦ • b ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ R ♦. l♦tt ♦4■1 ♦il.413. OTHERS) i.•.•.•.•.•♦4 ■ ♦♦•iii ♦• • , i• • • I ° ••• * ,i• 4i O ii AS i �i♦i i i i i i S•i441∎•••• S•0•0S S••i • •i JO, .61:•46 ?? ♦ i i i ) I • i i• • i•iii • i ii •„444•444.S. •••• • 4• • • i. H y i oi • S* i i i• • i i , iiii i• c i+ a II ,•♦• • •♦•♦•♦•4,, • • ♦• ♦� •• ♦•♦••♦•♦• ♦• .. • ••• T•♦•♦•♦••♦ •♦•♦•♦••♦•♦•♦• ♦• •••♦• ♦• ♦• ♦• ' • • EXISTING WETLAND iITz 896.0 - _ - OUTLET 889.4 3 Br: 0 HK-8924__ - WL -8924 _ ' �� Ai. .695.5 j1 - Bw:891,0 \ 1T1-69i.01-, \\ flT``' -693.0 I Bw_ X920 1 IBw 8910 I \ O7 :894..01 1 1Br�692. y:993.9'. - - EIn89b0 iw - Mar,- 097101 7•=119E.0-1- _ • Bw_894.c1_, 00111110 TO 00.AVAIS Sn Wow Al «OSLO rr was Dram Nf 1117111 ran 0010 Fa 1.101 WIT TIN 94AU K As MMSMY 1L 1410 W Aa a SOS w 110.01 ID n( Salt wows MOR91111 1 SWAM 1.118 P1 WI (Weal TYPICAL BUILDING PAD GRADING DETAIL IE10 L nx 8700 S01An01 0.111 n0 a1.Q naa wo M IAVAT L- Ft x •0100001 u ,m, w.M CTD 0.01071 M TIC 10111 Cf n[ SOT (001000T u4 TO Samwno .wrm a[ wax A p CIN[CI01 TOR D0I USNx PA 94.S Al A NDNIN 1 Contxe St NA IOM N 1E TOT (SOL or SA TO SEE SOT wp a moo San sa COLUMN ra E4.04 MOM PM SS. 1 COPSE. Naa uN 9111 119 SOL 10 AMaf Nax ICI N mxTI0C711 ALOY DRH MONT. A nx .A81 PAM .AY x MAIM 1X10 Sa MT N COIN POI 1100 TO IAMO AM 9010 a 110 MOM IVY. CO ML. 10 WIIACT I i ao PzOf 1M 0011001•31T 1 10x101101 10 MCC MS 1101 s FAMIT MUM MT 0 TO x C06.=01 ALC07C0TOIt. 111 II1, x190 WY VOLT M C MO 1110010 M NOx MILYAMN CO RR -t 1101 1)0 090 011E f M 10W111Y 10190X1 NO OTT Al MOIL 1 1 - 00081101.x9 / / ' 9T111011.10 (1t Cf.) AM / lar_ 893.0 AI Tw.e9 &0 ' 18.1_ 897.0 I r // r / / ./ / �� •• 1NE'OBSRTRFA U71�1a( iNf BRNAnON SHOWN ON NESE PLANS IS A UDUTY CUAUTY LEVEL 0. THIS DUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED A IN T 1 NES G 0 C ES Di CXASCE 38-02. TI F THE n N 2, HIED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR E COI.IEG ON ANO DEPICTION a ExISTI C SUB91RfAC Nf1 .ATA' THE CONTRAC TOR � AND/OR SUBC ACTOR A DETERMINE E EXACT LOCATION TING / 5SM LL Of. 5 0101 YgEF• COMMENGNC WORN BY CONTACTING PN �T��j C C THE NOTIFICATION CENTER CO ER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA. THE CONTRACTOR / AND'OR :P:CON 'ACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE F A (AMAGF NN1CH MIGHT ) E / . 981E OR ANY AND ALL 0 5, BE OCCASIONED BY NIS OR HER / ii14. TO EXA1 Y LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). 1\ /'/THE CCNTRAC IF TNC n1 c I INF ALL UTILITIES A . I ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WTNIN THE 9TE HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY NE ENGINEER M91 THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT 884 I ACTIVP. Nn AC1VS nauS 04 0140 Me a. , N.r•ti IT •010...,•1 rent! • t• nen CP, no-t,«- BELIES: A 89 01.101111 N DO rm II IWYT TO W OLIA10N 1111111 ISO •510 N 1010 f POMO 10.10A1011 W15 Ax MS[A WWI ISM .alma 101E RAT. M 51 5)510 X8 II UM 01190[ C 10 s1AN06I WY IAN COMIC, Tap MINA a PAM AMY NN ONx. 80 SOU OM . n 1101 SOS waT 00000/105 70 0•10 1:1 0501 101 5850E 1/ 5' MD? ROOT 1I• MN. (I0 1101 0P1N) 1ARA 010511 • 11 �.�A.���Ti wy. /tFF� � p2p '� 1Fil. •111 =R If _ 11. ;11=11 Hai. II II. 1 11- =! \ 1= Rc 1905 On. \- 5810RO..509 017114100) WHEN THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH THE MITIGATION AREAS BELOW THE NWT. BUT ABOVE THE EXISTING WATER LEVEL AS DIRECTED BY THE OMER. THE SEEDING SHALL COMPLY 'MTH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3876 WITH TH9 USE OF MN /DOT MIXTURE N0. 310 MTH WET FORE MIX AND APPUED AT A RATE OF 50 POUNDS PER ACRE THE SEEDED AREA SHALL BE MULCHED. THE MULCH SHALL COMPLY MTh MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3882- TYPE 1. THE MULCH SHALL BE APPUED AND ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE 'MTH IAN/DOT SPECIFICATION N0. 2575.3. F1. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. THE MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED PATH A DISC. CLODBUSTER OR OTHER APPROVED EQUIPMENT. CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT FILTER INLET PROTECTION (SEE DETAIL) SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL CATCH BASIN INLETS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION' HAS OCCURED UPSTREAM OF CATCH BASIN(S). ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIME$}1TT SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF INLET/PROTECTION. LUDT CONSTRUCT 2' HIGH BERM NTH 15151015/0 00E SLOPE OF 4:1 ROCK AND WIRE MESH STORM SEWER INLET SEDIMENT FILTER NO SCALE REV 7 -05 / Y TO 3' GRAVEL ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE NO SCALE NOTE: PRIOR ROOT 111/ 91801 OF ANY 9TE WORLLK� THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED FOLLONNC EACH RAINFALL. MAINTENANCE OF 115E ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL INCLUDE A TOP DRESSING OF NEW CRAWL GE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT CF THE GRAVEL AS NEEDED, TO KEEP 115E ENTRANCE FREE FROM COLLECTED MUD. Y.Y 000 MGR AV MG woo! DT DRAINAGE FARR FARM NNAR -D4\110 MICE a MMam mu.) MIL DO• - YAM TC *0505 GADS PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL a 0 0 0` 0 AOm[L I• • a• MEI. SILT FENCE DETAIL NO Scut 0 60 00001505 5OL .I N ; 12Q.._. SCALE IN FEET a c za SHEET NUMBER 0.5.01 1102111 I REV. nA1 UTILITY NOTES; 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE 8 INCH SCR 35 PVC WHEN LESS THAN 16' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER GREATER THAN 18' DEEP AND LESS THAN 22' DEEP SHALL BE SCR 25 PVC. GREATER THAN 22' DEEP SHALL BE DIP. 2. SANITARY SERVICE UNES SHALL BE 4. PVC— SCR 26. 3. WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE 1' TYPE "K' COPPER. 4. ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (D.I.P.). DEVELOPER SHALL BE REIMBURSED FOR ALL TRUNCK WATERMAIN GREATER THAN 8'. 5. EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL U81JT1ES AS REQUIRED. MINIMUM EASEMENT W10111 SHALL BE 20 FEET IN WIDTH. CENTERED ON U11 JTY LINE APR 2 6 2006 !..`; LAKES LEGEN D EXIS11NG A FLARED END SECTION —.4*-- OVERHEAD WIRES PROPOSED • MANHOLE —>— SANITARY SEWER A CATCH BASIN —»- -STORM SEWER 4- HYDRANT —1 —WATER MAIN A FLARED END SECTION l / / / �\ • N -- / ■/// /\ / / / / / / / 1 / 11 � j / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I I �/ / / / / / / / / / I I // ,/ / / / / I I / // / I I I / / , / / / I I / / , / I I / // / / / 1 I I 1 ,/ / ,, / / /, / / / ! ! i / i i 1 / // I I !//f � / 1 1 � / ! // % I 1 I 1 1 1 ! r I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 11 11 1 I I 1 i1 \ 1 1, \\ 1\ l - _.____ - -_- 1 / > `\ `\ \ \ __ 2 \ \` ,, \ • \ \- -.�// -Lm 4,.C,ADDI (la ORA13 BAFFLED 1164 ]uA mtm 33 r sox x4.464' fA (x 2 18 -BD6 --OS 11C SJBSIRFAOE U1UTY NFORMA1f0N SWAMI CR THESE PLANS I5 A OMIT OUAUTY LEVEL 0. NS QUALITY LF.EL WAS DETFAYY160 / ACCCRONO TO DC QMEU IR3 Cr CILASCE 38-02. 1111E0 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FCR THE COLLECTION ARO DEPICTION CF (55TNO • / SJBSIRFACE UTILITY DATA' THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR 918CON1RAC1ORS SMALL DEIERNNE THE COACT LOCATION Cr ALL MOW / UTILITIES BEFORE CCYMENONC WORK. BY CONTACTNG TIE NORNCAIICN (ENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR IBMNESOTA). THE CCNTRACTOR AND/OR SLEDONTRACTOR AU1EE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR AMY ANO ALL DAMAGES WEO1 WOW BE OCCASIONED BY HIS CR HER FAILURE TO EMILY LOCATE AM0 PRESENVE ANY AND ALL (MUTES (tROERtlt0UHD AND OVERHEAD} F THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAM TEE MANN THE STE HE CR SE %ULL MOM* 116 EHd1EER 441H THE LOCATION, SIZE. INVERT MO F THE TEE LAC IS =rot NO ALIVE DRAM TILE SHALL BE SAOCF UIO EITHOUT APPROVAL FR011 THE PR0.ECT MEWL i 6162 0 60 120 SCALE IN FEET M - - Yn. 2ND Planning • Surveying SHEET N1Y8FR C.6.01 REV. HERA FIE / 13286 '"# r) / TOP OF SURFACE OF WATER =890.6 (SPRING, 2005) • • z( (-rrnrr' PARK ie ♦ / APR 2 6 2006 LAKES i SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SEC. 28, T. 31, R. 22 - • .11,c TREELINE FLO3DPLAIN PER RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT --EWE OF WETLAND 711;; ---- - - - - -- - -- SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 , - -- OF SEC. 28, T. 31, R. 22 NORTH 1/4 CORNER CRC T 11 R 99 \--NORTH LINE OF THE NE 1/4 .,c1/49 \2 • -r. BLOCK NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE-, SW 1 4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF , — 1 , _ / 1 / . r[ ) 1 iNV7■7(7 / 1 i — i , / , 1 ,- ,r ,-,/ NORTH UNE Of THE ---- -- ...- / ' SW 1/4 oF31-if SE 1/4. th-DF BECINNI1,16 -- __,./ / .-- cf ,a-c--fa, T. 317Ft.-2: • xpb :44•"*""' =Am Ufa , ......,............ft z..•.--.............." - _.........—............... 4,,////ANIIIMINIOWN="6"'"'', ....,..11.11 ;■•■ .....irms."' rismulmz,f.. low; zi fi 4 ' 11111MON9 ,, 4. , - ........„,, , ..) • to ALIBI% 11■■•■■wainn” , ,;::11,Z 1 . • ...10/000..................% 1 . ; 4, . allfilari7MR4 Z11.11";II Wainoriyi7A7va WPM 12 . gAnd116111111111111111111MIIIIII VailllialladdAllailff 1 / ',17,A,,t,... Immo fotwasimazuvi Ai:num is fox . ;mad no 1 Mill1141111.11111111.1111"."'MITA # ifflOININIMITAIMINIII•draIN.. 11,4111±:mamivnl--As t., iiiiMLPINIIIIIV 31: 0 Vel tj i 47- • rl ramill1111..k1111117114 — st39:418, 388.4S (1.1EASL 80/ Si 0"8, 4817.sescrE coamir — - --- Y Oft - - BLOCK a 1 1 \ " 1 N'\ -:-- :/ HW/ L/ =/ 8 z / , -' - / / \ - / / / / / --'/ . 1 , .' , , , , ,j / / ' , ' / // / / / / / , / 1 , / / / / / , — — _,— / 1 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ' / / / / / 1 / / / / / / / 1 / ' /j / / / / )r■4 1 1 1 / / / /1 1 / / / 1 / 1 I 1 1 / 1 1 1 ,, 1 / / wrimvmm wrimer,01.,...ansrami •••••• • •••••• 7 • a ' JAIL' Fuum0115,0 116411.3 24111.Fr SDRIS v... • 60.4X ht s-. • ;IL. _ 474 L•k_ :: it. \ ../ lliz. /- ..::.- ED GEIOF WETLAND--. / TOP OF SURFACE OF WATER. =890.6 (SPRING, 2005) isimr-r stain 110.4.% PARK 18 Li,,,--..plummpa I I eltuirit;* 111;k74 tel7t7141...i.grkret...„ „0140,, siimmilormtak. 157°..°"111 TREEUNE •■•••■•• I; • SOUTH 1/4 CORNER Of SEC. 28, T. 31, R. APR 2 6 2006 ' ,A.) LAKES NORTH 1/4 CORNER Cf--- SEC. 33, T. 31, R. 22 RAMAN PER IDCE GEC WATERSHED DISTRICT .---EPE OF WElLANDIE ------- SOUTH UNE OF THE SE 1/4 ,--- OF SEC. 28, T. 31, R. 22 \--NORTH UNE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 33, T. 31, R. 22 • L00300- -- 1_ ..." .„../. .../.:****;,.>:.;k......„::'?" -- l -1 r 1 r �- / f El-�i�'�x: vl 11 1 � % 6 A 1 n S7 n nnlTlllAl ! // v� /� f 4_ I V IJ t.� /1 LJ L../1 I I V I V ■L -' /�/ •-__ 9, E 1 // _: .- 1/' (: / Y, % / • /// j/! / / /, i / ' /�% „ • / /i;% / / I 'I / // 1,4 ■ f / , ) / f f w WETLAND MITIGATION CROSS SECTION T .A. • y A y y y y y y 1s fir/ i /f 2 ; / / /111,11 y —may y y y E I 1 Is•' ><+"\\ ' .A. A. ,4 \y,�� r/ L r/ Mir y e y umpagemujosztamakm WETLAND M OATION TABLE* IMPACT (SQ. FT.) NWC (SQ. FT.) PVC (SQ. FT.) IMPACT 1 5,726 IMPACT 2 225 MITIGATION BASIN A - 16.879 SWIP 1 - - 2.614 TOTALS 5,951 16,879 'REQUIRED MITIGATION 2:1 (MICA), 1.5:1 (COE) 2.614 NOTE SEEDING IN THE WEILAND MITIGATION AREA SHALL BE A NATIVE SEDGE/WET MEADOW SEED MIXTURE (BWSR W2) OR APPROVED EQUAL UPLAND BUFFER AREA SHALL BE SEEDED WITH A NATIVE SE MINNESOTA MESIC TAU. -GRASS PRAIRIE SEED MIXTURE (BWSR U5) OR APPROVED EQUAL MEMO BCODARY DLIAEA1lD N OCTOBER 2004 BY EWE DAIROMENTN.. NG APPROVED IT MCC CEOI WMERIDED D614Ci LEGEND vas-ma SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOURS COSTING STORM SEVER USING 11E1LANDS PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL FENCE PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEVER OVERFLOW ELEVATION WETLAND IMPACT AREA FLOODPLAIN FtL AREA FLDCOPL IN MITIGATION AREA 960 X"2-5 'DE ASSU FA(E MUM NFORMADCM *KM MI VIBE FLANS D A MUM ONNIY IEAEL DC 110 CORM LEW]. W DEE RMPED MJCCOMM 00 DE CUMUI I OF CASE 311-42 POLED "MANSARD OUNII ES FOR 1K OOIECDOM Ale DEPICDOM OF MEAN SUBSURFACE URA!' DATA' ➢E COMIC= ACAS IOXIMMACKED !(EL DEVM E VIE OIACT =M EM Cl ALL DOSING UTD(GE7 DENTE tt1BEMOIB DODO BY COMMON TEE MODFICAIOI MO IR (OOER STATE DIE FOE 1/DESOTA), TIE CO(MACICE MID/CR lCOMMAMOR AGES 10 E MAY If3PO/iIL a* 11(0 NO AL DAMAGE.; CCM 1 1 T IC =AWED BY PM OR FRII FAURE 10 MOW 'OWE MO PIEMNE ,W1' AND ALL UEU1Bi Becum IOUM) MO MERHENN. F 7TE GaraaACIOR OICOIA(ERS AMT OMN A[ ■➢M at inc. K co It !HALL wry DE caw= WB( RE =AIM !E, MEM NO F DE RE LIE I AMC. 1C ACRE MAN tL !MIL E 'MEWED MOH AIFEOYAL (ROM IC PRD.EC0 0ODELR. iA :I 1 R 21 RBVWon! M' D� ammo _.. . • . . 1 b 1 St Eby certify that this plan was me or under my direct supErvbgal and that a duty Licensed Prof al Engineer EK �. lal. DT �/ Stat. aT MkM1EeE10ta °U"' D� TU £ngbeev%Fg • P/Qnnkig • S)/Mljtfrlg T5� A... A1crtlE �'rnph `763/47 55447 MFRA PAS TEST /476 -8572 b= McCombs Frank Roos NE' PRGN ER E PRESERVE LINO LAKES. TA INTEg2A HOMES PRELIMINARY W7)GAi1ON PLAN Cram lU APR 2 6 1006 Dote 4/10/00 Clucked N C BRIAN J. BOURASSA . ." : ° lQtt ` o license 21816 Associates,loc. • • • MEMORANDUM May 5, 2006 To: Planning & Zoning Board From: Jeff Smyser Subject: Rules of Conduct, Meeting Rules The P & Z has informally discussed assembling rules for conducting P & Z meetings. One of the things we were waiting for was resolution of the City Council's Code of Conduct. We thought that the City Council's rules might be instructive for the P & Z meeting rules. The City Council Code of Conduct is attached. This code was adopted by the City Council in April 2006. Staff is providing this for information only, we are not recommending any action. If the P & Z would like to continue toward a set of meeting rules, staff and the Board can get that ball rolling. • • • MEMORANDUM May 5, 2006 To: Planning & Zoning Board From: Jeff Smyser Subject: Joint Meeting of Boards To Discuss Large Conservation Development Project North of Main Street: "Nature's Preserve" Staff has been working with a developer on a large development in the vicinity of the elementary school on Main St. The project would include lands owned by several developers and which, combined, totals approximately 240 gross acres. The area has been noted as an important site from an ecological standpoint because of some rare species and habitat. There is a wetland complex, part of a large drainage subwatershed, that would benefit greatly from restoration activity. A restoration plan would be prepared as part of the development of the property. It is important that the citizen boards, as representatives of varied community interests, are aware of the importance of the conservation development planning in the community and the value of such planning on this site. Please plan to attend a joint meeting on this project: Wednesday May 31, 2006 6:30 p.m. Community Room This joint meeting will include: City Council Planning & Zoning Board Environmental Board Park Board Economic Development Advisory Committee • • M; George T 'itch Lak