The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/09/2006 P&Z Packet• CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, August 9, 2006 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (Scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 12, 2006 IV. OPEN MIKE • V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, MUSA Allocation, Variances, and Preliminary Plat for a four lot single family residential subdivision. — Paul Bengtson VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Administrative Actions — (memo distributed - no discussion necessary) VII. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4- minute limit • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice - Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT July 12, 2006 . 6 :38 P.M. . 7 :20 P.M. : Michael Hyden, Perry Laden, Robert Nelson, Brian Pogalz (Vice Chair), Rob Rafferty, Michael Root : Paul Tralle (Chair) : Paul Bengtson & Jeff Smyser I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Vice Chair Pogalz called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:38 p.m., July 12, 2006. • II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 14, 2006 Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to approve the June 14, 2006 Minutes as presented and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Vice Chair Pogalz declared Open Mike at 6:40 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:39 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS • DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 12, 2006 Page 2 • A. PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit for a Private Dog Kennel at 575 Ash Street Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report, noting that the applicant currently has three dogs and is proposing to keep those existing dogs on the premise. Mr. Bengtson explained that the city had received three phone calls regarding the public hearing notice, but only one resident continued to voice concern after clarification that the applicant would only have three dogs. Staff recommended approval of the application subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Vice Chair Pogalz opened the Public Hearing at 6:46. Margo Polta, 575 Ash Street, applicant was present for questions. Mr. Laden made a Motion to close the Public Hearing at 6:49. Motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow a Private Dog Kennel at 575 Ash Street subject to the following conditions: a. The proposed development application has been found to be consistent with the policies and recommendations of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed development application is compatible with present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed development application conforms to performance standards herein and other applicable City Codes. d. Traffic generated by a proposed development application is within the capabilities of the City. e. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. f. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 5 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Meeting Rules Mr. Smyser explained that city staff was suggesting that the board accept guidelines specific to the Planning & Zoning Board at this time. Board Members agreed to accept a set of Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Guidelines to be distributed at future meetings in the effort of public awareness. They also suggested adding text to the bottom of the agenda noting that meeting guidelines could be found on the reverse side. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board July 12, 2006 Page 3 Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to accept the Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Guidelines. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. Board Members later agreed to add text to meeting agendas requesting that all electronic devices be turned off during the meeting. City staff agreed to add the suggested text to future agendas. B. Comprehensive Plan Update Process Mr. Smyser stated that the process to update the city's Comprehensive Plan has begun. He explained that the process involves various interrelated steps including a city quality of life survey, a visioning process & ultimately the updated Comprehensive Plan. The city intends to start the visioning process in the next few months. He described that the visioning process will lead to a set of goals, which will be used to guide the Comp Plan. A group of people will be selected to serve on the visioning committee and Comp Plan Task Force. Mr. Smyser noted that, by law, the Planning & Zoning Board is the leading body for preparation of the Comp Plan, with the City Council being the final decision maker. Staff added that the City Council's goal is to get the plan to the Metropolitan Council by the end of year 2007. By law, the plan must be completed by the end of 2008. Staff noted that the city charter will be examined as part of the comprehensive plan update process, but any changes to the charter must be approved by the voters with a referendum. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Laden made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:20 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant DRAFT MINUTES AGENDA ITEM V.A. • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: August 9, 2006 TOPIC: Golden Acre Rezone From Rural to R -1 Variances for Lot Depth, Lot Width, and Lot Area Preliminary Plat Allocation of 1 Acre of MUSA Reserve BACKGROUND Tim Anderson has requested approval of the Golden Acre plat. Much like Hailey Manor and Cavegn Estates previously, this project involves the redevelopment of an existing residential lot in the Mar Don Acres neighborhood into a total of four residential lots. The proposed plat would accommodate the existing dwelling on lot 1, another buildable lot fronting Lois Lane, and two buildable lots fronting Arlo Lane. To accommodate the development proposal, the following approvals are necessary: 1. Rezoning from R (Rural) to R -1 (Single Family Residential) 2. Preliminary plat 3. Variances Lot depth: 132' instead of 135' (all four lots); Lot width: 77.5 feet instead of 80 (lot 2); Lot area: 10,230 square feet instead of 10,800 square feet (lot 2); and Side Setback: 6.27 feet instead of 10 feet.(lot 1) 4. Allocation of 1 acre of MUSA reserve • ANALYSIS The following is a summary of the proposal: Gross Site Area 1.11 acres Net Site Area 1 acre Total Lots 14 Gross Density 3.6 units /acre Net Density 4.0 units /acre Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. • Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural North residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 South residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural East residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural West residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural Growth Management, MUSA Reserve: The City obtained additional MUSA allocation from the Met Itouncil for all properties fronting on Lois Lane as part of the Hailey Manor project (east of this site) which is to e allocated with the preliminary plat and granted with the final plat. That is, the properties were not to receive MUSA until rezoned and platted. Growth Management, Units/Year: The table attached to this report shows the status of the staging plans for final platting new residential units. The three new units in Golden Acre would fit within the policy of 147 per year and so could be final platted in 2006. Rezoning The site currently is zoned R (Rural). In order for the urban-sized lots to be created, the site must be rezoned to an urban residential zone. As stated in the zoning ordinance: • The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The application includes an amendment of the comprehensive plan to change the land use and the MUSA line to accommodate the project. If this amendment is approved, the project would comply with the comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Bluebill Ponds to the north and Hailey Manor to the east both are zoned R -1 (Single Family Residential). The R -1 (Single Family Residential) zone allows lots of 10,800 sf, which would accommodate the majority of the Golden Acre lots, and would be consistent with adjacent urbanized development. The rest of the Mar Don Acres neighborhood will remain as larger lots unless further redevelopment occurs. Lot size alone does not create an automatically incompatible situation. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (in the ordinance). The new lots will conform to the R -1 standards in the zoning ordinance except for minor deviations in lot depth, lot width, and lot area. This will be resolved with approval of the variances (see below under "Lots "). 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Sanitary sewer and water are available being installed within Lois Lane with stubs set up for the two lots that are proposed. Sanitary sewer and water is already available within Arlo Lane for the site. The utilities are appropriately sized to handle the level of service necessary for the four lots within the proposed Golden Acre plat. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. • The addition of 3 single family homes will not overburden the roadway system. Lois Lane has outlets to the east and west and Country Lane connects to 77th St. to the south. The current rezoning proposal would apply only to the property included in the Golden Acre plat. Future redevelopment of other properties within the area would require a rezoning and platting of such properties. Preliminary Plat "tots: The lots will be 132 feet in depth. The minimum lot depth in an R -1 zone is 135 feet. When the Mar Don Acres lots were platted, they were 294' deep. The 30' easement on the north edge, which now includes Arlo Lane, reduces the depth to 264'. Half of that is 132'. It is impossible to know why the extra six feet was not planned for when Mar Don Acres was platted. However, it is clear that the intent was to plan for a road on the north side, and a 30' easement was platted. The construction of Arlo Lane fulfilled that plan for a street. The City approval of the creation of Arlo Lane was an acknowledgement of the intent to provide the opportunity for the Mar Don Acres lot to subdivide. In order to fulfill this, the lots must be smaller than 135' in depth. The locations of Arlo and Lois Lanes prevent larger lots. It may be possible to add three feet onto one row of lots and make the other row 129', though the value of such a change is questionable. Therefore staff finds the minor deviation of less than 3% to be acceptable. Lot 2 will be 77.5 feet in width and consist of 10,230 square feet. The minimum lot width in an R -1 zone is 80 feet (though lots of 1.5 acres or more are allowed to be re- subdivided at a width of 75 feet) and the minimum lot size is 10,800 square feet. The existing home that will remain on lot 1 is the cause for this deviation. In order to provide an appropriate setback (the applicant has proposed 6.27 feet, which is explained in the Setback section below) the applicant is proposing to reduce the lot width and area of Lot 2 so that the existing dwelling can remain on Lot 1. This is a reduction of 3% and 5% respectively; therefore staff sees this as an acceptable minor deviation of the code requirements. Setbacks: The applicant is proposing to deviate from the 10 foot side setback required for principal buildings in the R -1 zone. Considering the location of the existing dwelling; strict application of the 10 foot setback would limit Lot 2 to a width of 73.5 feet and an area of 9,702 square feet. Therefore the applicant is proposing 6.27 foot side setback, which is slightly greater than the five feet that is required for accessory structure and will therefore maintain a minimum of ten feet separation between the existing dwelling and the home constructed on Lot 2. Considering this structure will exist when Lot 2 is developed, this reduction in setback will not have a negative effect on the surrounding properties. Streets: Arlo Lane, Lois Lane and Country Lane all are existing roads. No additional roads are being proposed. The existing road system can accommodate the traffic generated by the new homes. As part of the final plat, the developer must dedicate the Arlo Lane right of way. This will fulfill the intent of the City when Mar Don Acres was platted. Arlo Lane exists now, and the dedication is more of a formality. Park Dedication: The current subdivision ordinance includes park dedication in the amount of $2075 per residential unit, less any land dedication. There is no land dedication needed, as Highland Meadows Park is nearby. The park dedication will be $2,075 x 3 new home lots = $6,225. Utilities: Sanitary sewer and water is already in place in Arlo Lane and is being installed in Lois Lane presently. All of the proposed lots, including the existing home, must connect to utilities. Onsite septic systems must be abandoned according to law. In addition, existing wells likely will have to be capped because of proximity to new sanitary sewer lines. These and other issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. dGrading and Stormwater Management: The grading plan submitted was not accompanied by the required rainage calculations, therefore the engineering of the site could not be completely reviewed and as a result staff is recommending continuing this item to the September 13th Planning and Zoning Board regular meeting. The plan is also subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD Ike Environmental Board's comments requesting an infiltration area in the form of a rain garden; requiring a storm water pollution prevention plan and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency permit; and requesting the submittal of a tree inventory /preservation plan will all be addressed with the developer prior to this item being brought forth to the September 13th regular meeting for the board's consideration. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending continuation based on the lack of sufficient engineering data to completely review the project. The following conditions are likely to be brought forward in September with staff s recommendation. 1. All lots in the plat, including the existing home, must agree to connect to City utilities. The City will not approve the final plat without legally enforceable assurance that all properties will connect and existing onsite septic systems will be appropriately abandoned. 2. Existing wells shall be capped when required by Minnesota Dept. of Health requirements. 3. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 4. A development agreement between the city and the developer must be executed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. The north 30 feet shall be dedicated to the City on the final plat for right of way for Arlo Lane. • 6. Park dedication must be paid in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 7. A permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District must be issued prior to final plat approval by the City. 8. Infiltration areas proposed on site should have the City native seed specification used. 9. A boulevard tree shall be provided for each lot frontage. This review is based on the following plans and information: City Engineer Comments dated August 3, 2006 Environmental Board Comments dated August 3, 2006 Boundary /Topographic Survey, June 30, 2006 Preliminary Plat submitted June 30, 2006 Preliminary Utility Plan submitted July 25, 2006 Preliminary Grading and Erosion Plan submitted July 25, 2006 LOTS /UNITS as of July 24, 2006 Development Name approved prelim. plats Prelim Plat Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) I 2003 -09 total max. 1029 year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Stoneybrook 103 51 0 2nd Addn 0 52 52 Century Farms North 249 56 65 52 43 33 249 Keefe: prel plat, not final plat 1 1 1 Morton (minor subdiv) 0 1 0 1 Ravens Hollow 56 0 56 56 Haley Manor (10 new lots) 10 10 0 10 Crystal Cove 3 3 0 3 Millers Crossroads 152 22 47 51 32 152 Lakeview Estates (2 new) 2 2 2 Snell (minor subdivision) 0 1 1 Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th 1 1 1 Justin's Preserve 1 1 1 Marshan Estates 4 4 4 Rice Creek Church duplex 2 2 2 Rice Church: Oakwood View 10 10 10 Junes Addn 2 2 2 Highland Meadows East 2nd 18 18 18 Marshan Townhomes 2nd 23 23 Pheasant Hills 12th island 8 8 8 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add 1 1 1 Vaughan Addition 5 5 5 Angie's Acres (1 new) 1 1 1 Marshan Lakeview (2 new) 2 2 2 Marshan Meadows 20 20 20 Pine Glen 72 40 32 72 Cavegn (1 new lot) 1 1 1 Golden Acre (3 new lots) 3 3 3 total 51 148 176 171 141 65 701 remaining of annual 147 remaining of 1029 for pre -2010 -29 -24 6 82 147 147 328 • • C I O F IINCIMES Memorandum DATE: August 3, 2006 TO: Paul Bengston, TKDA FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer D--u RE: Golden Acre Attached is a TKDA site review dated August 3, 2006 of the submitted documents for the Golden Acre Project. All comments must be addressed before final approval is given for this project. Contact me with any questions, thank you. ')OO Town Center Parkw,iv, Lino Likes, Minnesota 55014 -1 1 82 Phone: 651 -9132 -2400 • Rix: 651 -982 -2499 • • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Golden Acre Proj. No.: From: Thomas D. Prew, P. E. Routing: Date: August 3, 2006 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Site Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 13602.000 The following site review is based on these submittals: 1. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan prepared by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated July 24, 2006. 2. Utility Plan prepared by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated July 24, 2006. Grading Plan Comments: 1. Drainage along side lot lines may not be directed onto adjacent property. 2. Proposed driveway locations must be shown. 3. The intent of the existing fence along Arlo Lane must be noted. 4. Existing top of curb shots must be provided. 5. The required 30 feet of City Right -of -Way is labeled incorrectly as a Drainage and Utility Easement along Arlo Lane. This must be corrected on the plat and all plan sheets. Utility Plan Comments: 1. Add local, state, and federal regulations to well abandonment also. 2. As -Built service locations to be updated as indicated in Utility Notes. Miscellaneous Comments: 1. All plat comments from previous review dated July 19, 2006 must be addressed. 2. Please see attached Drainage Review dated August 3, 2006 for drainage items. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Reference: Golden Acre Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Proj. No.: 13602.000 Date: August 3, 2006 Routing: 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota The following review is based on these submittals: 1. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, submitted by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated July 24, 2006. 2. Drainage Calculations, submitted by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated July 27, 2006. Drainage Review Comments: 1. The existing area is 1,100 sf more than the proposed area. Typically, the existing and proposed areas should coincide. Please clarify. To prevent adverse impacts to downstream properties, the post - development runoff rates from the site shall not exceed predevelopment rates for the 2 -, 10 -, and 100 -year storm events. 3. Show the location of the rock construction entrance and inlet protection on the plans. 4. Include a detail of the rock construction entrance and inlet protection on the plans. 5. Include a note indicating that streets shall be kept free from sediment carried by construction traffic. 6. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will need to be developed as part of the Application for General Storm Water Permit for Construction Activity (MN R100001) required for this project. A copy of the SWPPP will need to be submitted to the City so that a copy exists at City Hall. 7. Contact Rice Creek Watershed District to determine if a permit is required for this project. If a permit is required, the watershed district will need to give approval prior to the City issuing final approval. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. From: Thomas D. Prew, P. Date: July 19, 2006 1500 Piper Jatfray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Reference: Golden Acre Preliminary Plat Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Proj. No.: 13602.000 Routing: The following Preliminary Plat Review is based on these submittals: 1. Preliminary Plat prepared by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated June 29, 2006. Plat Comments: 1. Front footage is less than standard 80' on Lot 2. Variance must be approved by Lino Lakes City Council. II° 2. Existing home located on Lot 1 encroaches on minimum 10' side lot offset. Variance must be approved by Lino Lakes City Council. 3. The existing Drainage and Utility Easements must be vacated. 4. Site to be disturbed is at least one acre, therefore a copy of the MPCA -NPDES Permit must be provided to the City. 5. Must submit copy of the Rice Creek Watershed District Permit approval. 6. Proposed Grading Plan must be provided for review and verification of easement. 7. Utility Plan must be provided for review. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • • Environmental Memo To: Paul Bengtson From: Marty Asieson Date: August 3, 2006 Re: August 2 Environmental Board Recommendations The following recommendations were made concerning Golden Acre: Although the site is not large enough for the RCWD to review, recommend following standard guidelines for addition of impervious. That is an infiltration area must be provided to infiltrate the impervious area from the Mpls -St. Paul median storm (.34 inches) in 72 hours. This area could be in the form of a rain garden between the 4 houses with as much impervious area as possible directed to it. The infiltration area must be protected from compaction before construction begins. The grading plan shows the surface water flowing to the neighbor lot. The grading plan should be changed to reflect on site storage /infiltration of water. The infiltration area should be in the form of a rain garden and the design approved by the City A SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) and a MPCA permit are required for this project. The SWPPP must be submitted to the City for approval before any soil disturbance occurs, as well as the MPCA permit. The SWPPP must be located on site (Preferably a mail box) with weekly and post rain fall event inspection reports. The developer did submit an erosion control plan (Attachment 4). The erosion plan should be made more comprehensive to address pollution issues such as concrete truck cleaning and litter containment. The plan needs to show a concrete truck wash site that is protected by containment barriers. All wash out must be removed from the site after construction. The plan signature is the responsible person that will inspect and correct deficiencies. The name and 24 hour phone number of this person must be added to the plan. Location of the required rock entrance must be shown on the plan. • Page 1 • • • Storm sewer catch basins need to be protected with an Infrashield type of device. Silt fabric will not be allowed. The SWPPP needs to be very site specific. With out revision, the project should not be allowed to move forward. An inventory of significant trees should be submitted with s tree preservation plan. Escrow one boulevard tree per house No soils should be imported or exported without City approval. Motion to approve recommendations by Norman, 2 "d by Grundhoffer. All were in favor. • Page 2 • • Aft lir g6 4-- A R N8r2r24 85 0 ornmmWS SURFACE) "-MAILBOX RACKS 7.-EX. CURB k GUTTER-, , IC'A 1 N A C E k U T I L I T Y E A B E M E N T--1 -4 As 4' z Y Gs irs 4F EY FENCE s D. FENCE /! / 1 'B L 0 0 K / / I EIUS11NG HOUSE le 1 0,7b o \ \ 40. 1. o \L -- E 4 4, Ir ■ DECK 4, 1 4, "-PVC VENT i/ •1 1 ./' 40' DRAINAGE k U vet ITT EASE M4€' Parsras'v 185.00 4, r 0 S L A N E , (B1TUNDIC S SURFACE) EC CURB & CUTTER 4, RECEIVED JUN 3 0 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES Bed= 1 lash & rm Peet LOCATION MAP NIT W SOME SECTION B. TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 0 • ion O W —►- NOM VERTICAL DATUM X 001.0 LEGEND DENOTES 1/2 801 BY 14 INCH MON PPE MONUMENT NARKED BY UCFNSE NO 17705 D ENOTES IRON PPE FOUND D ENOTES FIRE HYDRANT DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE D ENOTES CURB STOP DDIOTE5 NELL DENOTES FENCE DENOTES FORCE OENMES EXISTING ELEVATIONS Lot 4, Block 1. MAR DON ACRES. Moka Camay Minnesota NOTES For the purposes of this survey, the south line of Lot 4. Block 1, MAR DON ACRES, has an assumed bearing of North 89 decrees 27 minutes 24 seconds West BEiATCH LARK T.N.H. located on the north side of Arlo Lane across from Lot Black 1, MAR DON ACRES. EL- 012.34 (NOVD 1929) TOTAL AREA 1.11 Acres (48,510 Sq.Ft) 5, CRAM JMA ZEJ0.015 6/29/06 DIEU F B-1 Ale. ‘1* 11' 0 0 `1_ 0 �s 00.14 %es %P' i SECTION B. TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 0 • ion O W —►- NOM VERTICAL DATUM X 001.0 LEGEND DENOTES 1/2 801 BY 14 INCH MON PPE MONUMENT NARKED BY UCFNSE NO 17705 D ENOTES IRON PPE FOUND D ENOTES FIRE HYDRANT DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE D ENOTES CURB STOP DDIOTE5 NELL DENOTES FENCE DENOTES FORCE OENMES EXISTING ELEVATIONS Lot 4, Block 1. MAR DON ACRES. Moka Camay Minnesota NOTES For the purposes of this survey, the south line of Lot 4. Block 1, MAR DON ACRES, has an assumed bearing of North 89 decrees 27 minutes 24 seconds West BEiATCH LARK T.N.H. located on the north side of Arlo Lane across from Lot Black 1, MAR DON ACRES. EL- 012.34 (NOVD 1929) TOTAL AREA 1.11 Acres (48,510 Sq.Ft) 5, CRAM JMA ZEJ0.015 6/29/06 DIEU F B-1 • • rt a ARLO s8rzr24 z "- MAILBOX RAOCS r! • • 4 4, +, 4, 4, LANE / 65.00 (BETIBDNOUS SURFACE) SEX CURB & CUTTER-) e 15 cr 2 '1 c 4, 4 MAID q R. 0.25 awe 0 A G _ z s • J 7' c c L---_l.,l� J6 0) 40 f 82.50 f R A 4 N89'27.24'W 5250 R R r FP ,` , I w =r •I - 122 0) = , es ( • L O 4 I ° '{� -E1c FFNCF 77.50 • N897i24'W ( • • f 4, V c S 2 �`\ 0.23 K ' aaar I + 1 4 1 ,J n I _ / I \ �s '5L J0 cL {>T '4, / 1 77.50 S8r27 24 B La 1a R c �4a fr .p 'rr 87.50 ( -PVC VENT 1 -- +44' DECK�_ -��/, s -- -- 5.27 635 0.26 ace EXISTING HOUSE 87.50 EXISTING DRIVE e 00 165.00 +0" r RECEIVED JUN 3 0 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES Sods 1 lack - SID Peet LEGAL: Lot 4, Block 1. MAR DON ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesoto NOTES For the purposes of this survey, the south line of Lot Block 1, MAR DON ACRES, has an assumed bearing of 89 degrees 27 minutes 24 seconds West Subject to easements of record if any LOCATION MAP Nor 10 SCALE 05i ,rA ,r► 14.,r i I Al sat ok .rA SITE L- si 1s WE ,r5 ri SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. OWNER/DEVELOPER 11M ANDSON 4, 547 LOIS ER LANE North UNO LAKES, MINNESOTA 55014 (715) 386 -5050 BENTCHMA.R.K T.N.H. located an the north side of Arto Lane across from Lot 5. Block 1, MAR DON ACRES. EL=912.34 TOTAL AREA 1.11 Acres (48,510 Sq.Ft.) ETOSTIIJG ZONING A -1 RESIDENTIAL R -1 (SINGLE .FAMILY) TOTAL ACREAGE - 43,560 sq.ft. (Excluding RCN) = 1.00 acres TOTAL NUMBER LOTS - 4 NET DENSITY - .25 UNITS/ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE - 10:890 sq.ft. - 0.25 acres MAXWUM LOT Siff - 43,004 sq.ft. - 0.99 acres AVERAGE LOT SIZE - 14.721 sq.ft. - 0.34 acres ENGINEERING BY: METRO LAND SURVEYING k ENGINEERING 248 APOLLO DRIVE UNO LAKES, MINNESOTA 55014 -3036 (763) 398 -6830 CONTACT: THOMAS HALEY SURVEYING BY.• METRO LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 248 APOLLO DRIVE UNO LAKES, MINNESOTA 55014 -3036 (763) 398 -6830 CONTACT: ERICK ORTIZ R -1. HOUSE ORDINANCE SETBACK AND FRONTAGE INFORMATION FRONT AND CORNER LOTS: 35 FEET FRONT ON COLLECTOR STREET (LOIS LANE'): 40 FEET REAR YARD: 30 FEET SIDE YARD: 10 FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT SETBACK UNE, 80 FEET VARIANCES k) LOT 2 - LOT WIDTH TO 77.50 FEET B:) LOT 1 = SIDEYARD SETBACK TO 6.3 FEET TYPICAL EASEMENTS: TYPICAL DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT STREET 4 10.00 -J 5.00 -■ CURB at NUTTER LOIS LANE MITUN910U5 SWAM) /HOC CURB k GUTTER / 0 P' L 10.00 -� 5.00 VARIABLE 1 rVARIABLE .0 1 } REAR UNE f BEING 10 FEET N MD114 ADJ00A10 STREET UNt5. AND 6 FEET N HEWN AND ADJ000NG SIDE EDT LINES AND REAR LIE EASEMENTS ARE REFLECTED ON WANING 00025 01HERFASE SHORN ON THE P020. LEGEND O DENOTES 1/2 NCH BY 14 NCH IRON PIPE YOIAAIENT MARKED BY UCENSE N0. 17760 • DENO 5 RCN PIPE FOUND -0 DENOTES FRE HYDRANT Jim DE140113 SANITARY MANHOLE • DENOTES CURB STOP ▪ DENOTES NELL -r- DENOTES FENCE -s - DENOTES FENCE NOVD VERTICAL DATUM x 908.0 DENOTES ECS1NG ELEVATIONS m .2 0 r W 0 UZ Q z W 1 S Z J PRELIMINARY PLAT DRAM JMA Imo MIEC, F ZEJO -015 DATE 6128/06 SKEET / PP -1 • • • a Pi GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ARL O LAND' S89'27'24 "11 65.00 \ (BITUMINOUS SURFACE) 4.---MAILBOX RACKS i1 , „--EX CURB & CUTTER- O 1 6 R A I N A G E & ss_ ssf arm ar- ar UU7 L ITY EASEMENT —J aF ■arm arm sr a ti ar 1 LOT 3 SELO GAR: 912.0 LFE: 907.9 LO: 911.9 `—)L FENCE r. 5 5 r A 910.9 911 910.9 5 49 140 909 LOT 4 SELO GAR: 912.0 LFE: 907.9 LO: 911.9 -- : * &P/\, \_J n 'T0 LOT 2 SELO GAR: 912.0 LFE: 907.9 LO: 911.9 1 1 1 X 1 1 910.9 DECK 6.27 0 86 r' R � 011 4 . CD . Nr 41 1St 1 e -PVC VENT , n6O ones 0.226 /////44,t////////// EXISTING HOUSE .I WeO 0 D D 40 DRAINAGE SIK S89'27T24`.8 O T I B I T Y E A S E M E N T ' ' , 165.00 —Ex CURB & GUTTER LOIS LANE (BITUMINOUS SURFACE) --EX. CURB & GUTTER SILT FENCE REOUIREMENTS FABRIC AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 3856 8' MAXIMA/ SPACING BET/JEER STAKES 2' 65688186 EMBEDMENT OF STAKES 1' MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF FABRIC 3'%3'X8' WNIMUM DIMENSIONS OF 5100D STAKES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE PFA MOOT SPEC. 3886 SILT FENCE WOOD POST M No. 500 GRADING LEGEND w EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS SILT FENCE DRAINAGE ARROW GRADING NOTES SELO LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 9 NORTN 1 H,« 1r'' '.1A SECTION B, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. RECEIVED JUL 2 5 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES n PROPOSED HOUSE TYPE (SPLIT ENTRY LOOK OUT> GAR: 9 1 2.O_ — PROPOSED GARAGE ELEVATION FLOOR LOVEST LFE. 9 O7.9�f PROPOSED LDVEST DPEN OPENING ELEVATION LO: 911.9�� PROPOSED CONTOURS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSED CURB DENOTE GUTTER UNE OF CURB. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WRH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (1 -800 -252- 1166) 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR LOCATIONS OF UT(UTIES. CONTRACTOR REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE TREES TO BE SAVED. SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS, THE BROKEN UMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION BY THE ENGINEER. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSUMED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE- SPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM FOUR INCH DEPTH TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEMED. THE PROPOSED GRADING PLAN INDICATES FINAL GRADING AFTER THE HOUSES ARE CONSTRUCTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A HOLDDOWN OF 2.5' ACROSS THE BOLD PAD LOCATIONS DURING THE GENERAL GRADING OF THE STE THE FINISHED BUILDING SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.10 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE PROPOSED ELEVATION. STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION. AREAS TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.10 FEET OF THE REQUIRED ELEVATION UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER TOPSCLL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN i INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WRH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY - NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE EUMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE A CO- APPUCANT WITH THE OWNER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIRED INSPECTION REPORTS AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON THE SITE HAVE BEEN RESTORED. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL TO BE PLACED AROUND STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY AND MUST BE REMOVED IF DESIGN CAPACITY HAS BEEN REDUCED BY FIFTY PERCENT. A STABIUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAW-TAMED FOR DURATION OF PROJECT. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER, NOT TO BE SODDED AND GREATER THAN EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT, SHALL HAVE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT TO BE SODDED. SEEDING SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPECIFICATION 3876 APPLIED AT A RATE OF FIFTY POUNDS PER ACRE SEEDING IN POND AND INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE MIXTURE 310NWT (NATIVE NET TALL) IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT SPECIFICATION 3876 APPLIED AT A RATE OF 82 POUNDA PER ACRE MULCH SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPEGFlCATION 3582, TYPE 2. THE MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT SPECIFICATION 2575.3. F1. MULCH TO BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF TWO TONS PER ACRE. MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH A DISC, CLODBUSTER OR OTHER APPROVED EQUIPMENT. 0 S 0 H Z 0 Ozw c z v) J2 ZZ °w f`Y � O GO LA) D- 0 z Lai 0 O LINO LAKES, MN z zQ <_i a L5J J 0 Q O c; z z Q 0 (DJ C9 L DEEMED KG CRAW KG PROJECT ZEJO -015 DALE 07/24/06 PEST E 1/1 • • UTILITY PLAN nu LO L H 1 fTE- S8r27'24'E 65.00 ', (BITUMINOUS SURFACE) ,r—MAILBOX RACKS EX. CURB & GUTTER -' I I I I MT mew_ was 0 20 +D O ° ° nasn m re NOR 101000 �- - AINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT*" Omen m1 rD UM 3 Is sr Lj5 \ < \ • v N - �1 5 FENCE x I x I 2 8585 - - -� I r \ 5 5r ;r -6.35 R A DEC( -6.27 EXISTING HOUSE .///, /z//./ / 4 . -PVC VENT a 9 LOW- xo 1000 �MTIOIS 0101 OTT SEIM IS Dafei OM O It Wel IMO wnc m: r101 -o XISTING DRIVE DRAINAGE 9k T I R I T Y E A S E M E N T 1401 IRWR 100 ® WO ROM MIER DDDaaS S8 r27'24'E SIMMI .001 TTO s "' MOE DDwO 165.00 m TATER O L.1110 SO= 0n1CC V/ 0010 OO C0100/O10 1•0‘ so= 000000 • `-EX. CURB & GUTTER • r - ROM TOM 400 TO COOLOT10 - 1. -r-420L T Al Y-F--- 5. (BITUMINOUS SURFACE) 1 "�."`R.sET'°" °of I I I I I -IX. CUR? & GUTTR I I 5 "T '5 "D"5 " 5 / I 031003 440 aAae=e.laarr a. LOCAAON MAP NOT 1D SCALE 011* NORTH 0 116.- I 00 1X4 L401 ■ SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. LEGEND UTILITY NOTES RECEIVED JUL 2 5 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES EXISTING WATEMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATEMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTUTIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO 7HE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' (651 - 454-0002) FOR UTIUTY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITLON OF 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION' AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS TO BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS TO BE SUMPED 0.08 FEET PER DETAILS. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REOUIRED FOR UIIUTIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SANITARY SEWER WYES SHALL BE 8 INCH BY 4 INCH SCHEDULE 40. SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 4 INCH SCHEDULE 40. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE TO BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (P.V.C.) SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS —BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. z O W 0 Z o OLiw Q Z • Jz Z�La � • Q F- .73z GOLDEN ACRES LINO LAKES, MN UTILITY PLAN DEDDRED KG KG PROJECT F ZEJO -015 DATE 07/24/06 1/1 • • • Memorandum To: Planning and Zoning Board and City Council From: Paul F. Bengtson, Associate Planner Date: August 1, 2006 Administrative Action — Site Plan Review Re: The Community Development Department recently completed an administrative review of a Site Plan Review application for a 15,015 square foot financial institution with drive through (Sheet Metal Workers Federal Credit Union) at 700 Apollo Drive. A site plan and building elevations are included with this memorandum for your information. The Planning and Zoning Board may recall that the applicant originally requested and then later withdrew a Preliminary Plat application to combine Lots 2 and 3 of the JADT Addition. They chose to retain the flexibility to either expand their operations to Lot 2 in the future (with the approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat) or to develop Lot 2 with a completely separate use. Upon withdrawal of the Preliminary Plat the remaining request for Site Plan Review was reviewed administratively as is allowed under the Zoning Ordinance. Staff is working with the developer to complete the Site Performance Agreement for development of the site; but building permit applications have not been submitted, nor has the developer indicated an anticipated construction schedule. If anyone needs additional information in regards to this application please feel free to contact me. 0666 - 622 -266 10(69 WA 7111111d 8303 0008 /6601 A963MY3N 00(6 m71791owNOSN3rsaw L AWN SLO3U11,96'd 11111 Sav13a 1311fISO10N3 HSNlllM 1d 311S V1OS3NNIW 'S3)IV1 ONI1 381:10 0110dY OOL 9 0L9 N011Ofa1SNOO M3N NOINI11103HO 1V83033 MWS ARD DETAIL ! ISLAND 900-C£1:90 :11 rci 2EcO 5:1011/10dif 0998-616-l66 .11,699 NY i611V6d N303 0606 NA10.1 Md366.314 00f6 0.17 834089NOSN1ISE01.1.43112h' tt VICS1\NIIN S7-,>1\i1 ON1 ot.t.omi !.sNoo MN NOIN^ -VL-Hlz1 MINS 11111111111011111111 111111111111111 ri IBM 1111111111111111= NININIMNIN - 1111 111=M 0 LU LU 1— 0 z 0 I Ci i Y OF LINO LAKES