Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/11/2006 P&Z Packet• CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, October 11, 2006 6:30 p.m. City Council Chambers (Scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 13, 2006 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Rezoning, MUSA Allocation, Variances, and Preliminary Plat for a four lot single family residential subdivision called Golden Acre — Paul Bengtson B. Final Plat for Junes Addition, 599 62nd Street — Paul Bengtson C. Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Legacy Townhomes 2nd Addition, Legacy at Woods Edge — Paul Bengtson D. Variances for road frontage, lot area, lot width, and lot depth, St. Paul Regional Water Services, Peltier and Centerville Lakes — Paul Bengtson E. Preliminary Plat and Variances for front setback and upland lot area for Fran's Estate, Birch Street — Paul Bengtson - This item will be for discussion only. F. Amendment to the PUD Final Plan for Lakewood Apartments to alter the approved elevations, Legacy at Woods Edge — Paul Bengtson VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Spotlight on 2030 - update B. Robinson Sod Farms VII. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4- minute limit. • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice - Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and /or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES g 1 hair) MBE RS •BSENT " I%Iichael;Roat FF PRESENT Paul Bengtson &'s.1eff Stn I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:33 p.m., September 13, 2006. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 9, 2006 and July 12, 2006 Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to approve the August 9, 2006 Minutes and the amended July 12, 2006 minutes and was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:35 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:36 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 13, 2006 Page 2 A. PUBLIC HEARING for a Rezoning, MUSA Allocation, Variance and Preliminary Plat for Golden Acre Mr. Pogalz made a motion to continue the Public Hearing to the October 11, 2006 meeting. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. B. PUBLIC HEARING for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to modify the allowable uses within the NB, Neighborhood Business, and the LB, Limited Business, zoning districts and for a Rezone from LB, Limited Business, to NB, Neighborhood Business, at Lot 1, Block 16, Millers Crossroads, located at the southeast corner of Birch St. and Hodgson Rd Mr. Smyser clarified that a Public Hearing notice was published for this item for the next City Council meeting which will include amendments to the GB, General Business District in addition to the NB and LB Districts. Mr. Smyser presented the staff report and explained that the City Council directed staff to rezone the property. Examining the differences between zoning districts led to staff recommendation to change some of the uses allowed in the business zones. Staff requested that the board take action this evening in order for the item to go to the City Council meeting as published. Mr. Tralle opened the Public Hearing at 6:59 p.m. Mr. Greg Schlink, Bruggeman Properties, owner of Lot 1, Block 16, Millers Crossroads, gave a brief history of the site. Mr. Schlink stated that the Planning & Zoning board recommended approval of a coffee house with a drive - through, but the City Council was prepared to deny the request. Mr. Schlink explained that they withdrew their application instead of receiving a denial. Mr. Schlink distributed a letter, dated September 13, 2006, referred to as Millers Crossroads Shopping Center (Agenda Item V.B.), to board members and city staff to be included as part of the public record. Mr. Schlink told board members that he was informed the issue was a "done deal," therefore he had no further comments but would answer any questions. Board Members questioned the applicant about the changes to the zoning ordinance as presented and asked if the drive - through was the applicant's main concern. Mr. Schlink stated that he thinks a drive - through use on a limited basis is reasonable for this site, adding that the intent is for a small coffee shop. He believes this would not cause a traffic issue or be detrimental to the neighborhood. Mr. Schlink stated that his main concern is the drive - through. He added that they do want the ability to serve beer and wine, provide outdoor seating, and have the potential for a small hospice facility. Mr. Rafferty addressed that staff has added options to the Neighborhood Business district as proposed, and that the City Council would deny a drive - through at this location. Mr. Schlink stated he would like the opportunity to propose a drive - through again in the future, but a rezone to the property would eliminate that option. DRAFT MINUTES • Planning & Zoning, Board September 13, 2006 Page 3 Mr. Rafferty made a motion to close the Public Hearing at 7:09 p.m. and was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Laden stated that he is in favor of a neighborhood business zone to the property. Mr. Laden questioned why a catering business would fit in to a neighborhood zone, as most catering business is taken off site, and opposed a change to catering but agreed with the other proposed changes. Mr. Pogalz asked what the property was zoned when this project was originally proposed. Mr. Smyser replied that the site was originally divided into R -1 and R -3 districts, but the site was guided for commercial. The Council later approved a rezone to LB for the corner. Mr. Smyser stated that when property was rezoned to LB, there was a great amount of discussion between the LB and NB zones at that time. The most recent application included the drive -thru, and City Council stated they would deny the proposal. Mr. Pogalz questioned Council's intent for denial. Mr. Smyser stated that the City Council re- examined zoning of the site, and no longer agreed with the original decision. Mr. Smyser explained that staff generated the additional revisions to the ordinance accordingly. Mr. Pogalz questioned the fairness of the decision. Mr. Smyser pointed out that the applicant withdrew the application, therefore an intent was a moot point. Mr. Laden asked if a building was proposed with the original approval. Mr. Laden believes the proposed use seemed appropriate for the site. Mr. Laden addressed that the original proposal did not include a drive - through. Mr. Smyser replied that a proposed building was reviewed and considered with the original approval. Mr. Laden asked staff if a Conditional Use Permit is granted for a coffee shop, at a later time could that use turn into a fast food restaurant or would the applicant have to reapply. Mr. Smyser responded that conditions were proposed for this site to restrict that the use would be limited to a coffee shop as part of City Council discussion. Mr. Smyser explained that a permitted use is a use by right, however a city can legally add stipulations to a Conditional Use Permit. He stated that a Conditional Use Permit gives the city excess regulatory ability, adding that this is an important difference between the two. Upon further discussion, board members and staff agreed that the fact is the applicant withdrew the application, therefore they needed to address the proposals presented before them tonight. • Mr. Smyser reiterated that the city has the right to rezone property. He added that often decisions are made and later determined that a different decision may have been better. Mr. Hyden commented that he understands that the city has the ability to make changes and can, but stated that the developer thought they knew what the rules were, and now the DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 13, 2006 Page 4 rules are being changed. He stated that he feels bad about the process. Mr. Hyden agreed with the proposed text changes except for the catering issue. He felt that all proposed amendments seem to fit the Neighborhood Business district. Mr. Tralle commented that he also determined that a drive - through was not appropriate for this site after the P &Z Board's recommendation. Mr. Tralle pointed out that many proposals have been made for this property and that the proposed changes will open up opportunities for business. Mr. Laden pointed out that often times the city rezones property without the property owner's approval, and added that there are no guarantees to the zoning of a property. Mr. Rafferty made a motion to recommend approval of the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment to modify the allowable uses within the Business zoning districts as proposed with the exception of the change to catering businesses. Motion was seconded by Mr. Hyden. Mr. Pogalz commented that the proposed site is currently being developed and the property owner has something in mind. He believes that the City Council should work with developers that have already been approved. A roll call vote was taken on the motion. Motion was approved 3 -2 with the following votes: Ayes: Rafferty, Hyden and Laden. Nays: Nelson and Pogalz. Mr. Laden made a motion to recommend approval of a Rezone from LB, Limited Business, to NB, Neighborhood Business, at Lot 1, Block 16, Millers Crossroads. Motion was seconded by Mr. Rafferty. Mr. Rafferty commented that it is disappointing when these things happen, but acknowledged that rules can change and the developer removed the option from the table. A roll call vote was taken on the motion. Motion was approved 3 -2 with the following votes: Ayes: Rafferty, Hyden and Laden. Nays: Nelson and Pogalz. Staff stated that these items will go to the City Council meeting on September 25. (Mr. Hyden left at 7:46 p.m.) VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Trash Enclosures/Detached Accessory Structures Mr. Bengtson asked what the board's directive was on this issue. Mr. Laden stated that the suggestion of proposing restrictions regarding this issue had been made to avoid lengthy discussions of this issue in the future. Mr. Rafferty commented that he felt the board could continue to encourage compliance without adopting strict requirements. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board September 13, 2006 Page 5 • Upon further discussion, board members agreed that they would continue to encourage future applicants to take measures to attach trash enclosures to buildings in an appropriate way without placing restrictions in the ordinance. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:55 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 4 -0. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant • • DRAFT MINUTES • AGENDA ITEM V.A. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: October 11, 2006 TOPIC: Golden Acre Rezone From Rural to R -1 Variances for Lot Depth, Lot Width, and Lot Area Preliminary Plat Allocation of 1 Acre of MUSA Reserve BACKGROUND Tim Anderson has requested approval of the Golden Acre plat. Much like Hailey Manor and Cavegn Estates previously, this project involves the redevelopment of an existing residential lot in the Mar Don Acres neighborhood into a total of four residential lots. The proposed plat would accommodate the existing dwelling on lot 1, another buildable lot fronting Lois Lane, and two buildable lots fronting Arlo Lane. To accommodate the development proposal, the following approvals are necessary: 1. Rezoning from R (Rural) to R -1 (Single Family Residential) 2. Preliminary plat 3. Variances Lot depth: 132' instead of 135' (all four lots); Lot width: 77.5 feet instead of 80 (lot 2); Lot area: 10,230 square feet instead of 10,800 square feet (lot 2); and Side Setback: 6.27 feet instead of 10 feet.(lot 1) 4. Allocation of 1 acre of MUSA reserve ANALYSIS The following is a summary of the proposal: Gross Site Area 1.11 acres Net Site Area 1 acre Total Lots 4 Gross Density 3.6 units /acre Net Density 4.0 units /acre Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural North residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 South residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural East residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural West residential Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural Slrowth Management, MUSA Reserve: The City obtained additional MUSA allocation from the Met Council for all properties fronting on Lois Lane as part of the Hailey Manor project (east of this site) which is to be allocated with the preliminary plat and granted with the final plat. That is, the properties were not to receive MUSA until rezoned and platted. Growth Management, Units/Year: The table attached to this report shows the status of the staging plans for final platting new residential units. The three new units in Golden Acre would fit within the policy of 147 per year and so could be final platted in 2006. Rezoning The site currently is zoned R (Rural). In order for the urban-sized lots to be created, the site must be rezoned to an urban residential zone. As stated in the zoning ordinance: The Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The site is currently guided for Low Density Sewered Residential and the application includes a request to allocate MUSA acreage to accommodate the project and with that approval the project would comply with the comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Bluebill Ponds to the north and Hailey Manor to the east both are zoned R -1 (Single Family Residential). The R -1 (Single Family Residential) zone allows lots of 10,800 sf, which would accommodate the majority of the Golden Acre lots, and would be consistent with adjacent urbanized development. The rest of the Mar Don Acres neighborhood will remain as larger lots unless further redevelopment occurs. Lot size alone does not create an automatically incompatible situation. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (in the ordinance). The new lots will conform to the R -1 standards in the zoning ordinance except for minor deviations in lot depth, lot width, and lot area. This will be resolved with approval of the variances (see below under "Lots "). 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Sanitary sewer and water are available being installed within Lois Lane with stubs set up for the two lots that are proposed. Sanitary sewer and water is already available within Arlo Lane for the site. The utilities are appropriately sized to handle the level of service necessary for the four lots within the proposed Golden Acre plat. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The addition of 3 single family homes will not overburden the roadway system. Lois Lane has outlets to the east and west and Country Lane connects to 77th St. to the south. The current rezoning proposal would apply only to the property included in the Golden Acre plat. Future redevelopment of other properties within the area would require a rezoning and platting of such properties. •reliminary Plat Lots: The lots will be 132 feet in depth. The minimum lot depth in an R -1 zone is 135 feet. When the Mar Don Acres lots were platted, they were 294' deep. The 30' easement on the north edge, which now includes Arlo Lane, reduces the depth to 264'. Half of that is 132'. It is impossible to know why the extra six feet was not planned for when Mar Don Acres was platted. However, it is clear that the intent was to plan for a road on the north side, and a 30' easement was platted. The construction of Arlo Lane fulfilled that plan for a street. The City approval of the creation of Arlo Lane was an acknowledgement of the intent to provide the opportunity for the Mar Don Acres lot to subdivide. In order to fulfill this, the lots must be smaller than 135' in depth. The locations of Arlo and Lois Lanes prevent larger lots. It may be possible to add three feet onto one row of lots and make the other row 129', though the value of such a change is questionable. Therefore staff finds the minor deviation of less than 3% to be acceptable. Lot 2 will be 77.5 feet in width and consist of 10,230 square feet. The minimum lot width in an R -1 zone is 80 feet (though lots of 1.5 acres or more are allowed to be re- subdivided at a width of 75 feet) and the minimum lot size is 10,800 square feet. The existing home that will remain on lot 1 is the cause for this deviation. In order to provide an appropriate setback (the applicant has proposed 6.27 feet, which is explained in the Setback section below) the applicant is proposing to reduce the lot width and area of Lot 2 so that the existing dwelling can remain on Lot 1. This is a reduction of 3% and 5% respectively; therefore staff sees this as an acceptable minor deviation of the code requirements. Wetbacks: The applicant is proposing to deviate from the 10 foot side setback required for principal buildings I the R -1 zone. Considering the location of the existing dwelling; strict application of the 10 foot setback would limit Lot 2 to a width of 73.5 feet and an area of 9,702 square feet. Therefore the applicant is proposing a 6.27 foot side setback, which is slightly greater than the five feet that is required for accessory structure and will therefore maintain a minimum of ten feet separation between the existing dwelling and the home constructed on Lot 2. Considering this structure will exist when Lot 2 is developed, this reduction in setback will not have a negative effect on the surrounding properties. Streets: Arlo Lane, Lois Lane and Country Lane all are existing roads. No additional roads are being proposed. The existing road system can accommodate the traffic generated by the new homes. As part of the final plat, the developer must dedicate the Arlo Lane right of way. This will fulfill the intent of the City when Mar Don Acres was platted. Arlo Lane exists now, and the dedication is more of a formality. Park Dedication: The current subdivision ordinance includes park dedication in the amount of $2075 per residential unit, less any land dedication. There is no land dedication needed, as Highland Meadows Park is nearby. The park dedication will be $2,075 x 3 new home lots = $6,225. Utilities: Sanitary sewer and water is already in place in Arlo Lane and is being installed in Lois Lane presently. All of the proposed lots, including the existing home, must connect to utilities. Onsite septic systems must be abandoned according to law. In addition, existing wells likely will have to be capped because of proximity to new sanitary sewer lines. These and other issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo *must be addressed to his satisfaction. Grading: The grading plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments will need to be addressed to his satisfaction prior to the site being developed. The plan is also subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board's comments requesting an infiltration area in the form of a rain garden have been addressed on the revised grading plan. The request for tree inventory /preservation plan will be required prior to any construction on the site. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of this request, subject to the following conditions: 1. All lots in the plat, including the existing home, must agree to connect to City utilities. The City will not approve the final plat without legally enforceable assurance that all properties will connect and existing onsite septic systems will be appropriately abandoned. 2. Existing wells shall be capped when required by Minnesota Dept. of Health requirements. 3. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 4. A development agreement between the city and the developer must be executed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the 410. The north 30 feet shall be dedicated to the City on the final plat for right of way for Arlo Lane. 6. Park dedication must be paid in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 7. A permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District must be issued prior to final plat approval by the City. 8. Infiltration areas proposed on site should have the City native seed specification used. 9. A boulevard tree shall be provided for each lot frontage. 10. A tree inventory and preservation plan must be submitted to the city prior to any construction on the site. This review is based on the following plans and information: City Engineer Comments dated September 18, 2006 Environmental Board Comments dated August 3, 2006 Boundary /Topographic Survey, June 30, 2006 Preliminary Plat submitted June 30, 2006 Preliminary Utility Plan submitted September 7, 2006 Preliminary Grading and Erosion Plan submitted September 7, 2006 • LOTS /UNITS as of July 24. 2006 Development Name approved prelim. plats Prelim Plat Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) I 2003 -09 total max. 1029 year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Stoneybrook 103 51 0 2nd Addn 0 52 52 Century Farms North 249 56 65 52 43 33 249 Keefe: prel plat, not final plat 1 1 1 Morton (minor subdiv) 0 1 0 1 Ravens Hollow 56 0 56 56 Haley Manor (10 new lots) 10 10 0 10 Crystal Cove 3 3 0 3 Millers Crossroads 152 22 47 51 32 152 Lakeview Estates (2 new) 2 2 2 Snell (minor subdivision) 0 1 1 Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th 1 1 1 Justin's Preserve 1 1 1 Marshan Estates 4 4 4 Rice Creek Church duplex 2 2 2 Rice Church: Oakwood View 10 10 10 1 Junes Addn 2 2 2 r Highland Meadows East 2nd 18 18 18 Marshan Townhomes 2nd 23 23 Pheasant Hills 12th island 8 8 8 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add 1 1 1 Vaughan Addition 5 5 5 Angie's Acres (1 new) 1 1 1 Marshan Lakeview (2 new) 2 2 2 Marshan Meadows 20 20 20 Pine Glen 72 40 32 72 Cavegn (1 new lot) 1 1 1 Golden Acre (3 new lots) 3 3 3 total 51 148 176 171 141 65 701 remaining of annual 147 remaining of 1029 for pre -2010 • -1 -29 -24 6 82 147 147 328 1 Memorandum DATE: September 18, 2006 TO: Paul Bengston, TKDA FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Golden Acre Attached is a TKDA site review dated September 14, 2006 of the submitted documents for the Golden Acre Project. All comments must be addressed before final approval will be given for this project. A copy of this review has been sent to Metro Land Survey and Engineering. Contact me with any questions, thank you. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651- 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • MEMORANDUM To: Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292 -0053 Fax www.tkda.com Reference: Golden Acre Site Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Thomas D. Prew, P. E. Proj. No.: 13604.005 Date: September 14, 2006 Routing: The following site review is based on these submittals: 1. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan prepared by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated September 6, 2006. 2. Utility Plan prepared by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated September 6, 2006. Grading Plan Comments: 1. The intent of the existing fence along Arlo Lane, where it intersects the proposed driveways, must be noted. 2. Please see attached Drainage Review dated September 14, 2006. Utility Plan Comments: 1. All items have been addressed. Plat Comments: 1. The required 30 feet of City Right -of -Way along Arlo Lane must be correctly shown on the Plat. 2. Front footage is less than standard 80 feet on Lot 2. Variance must be approved by Lino Lakes City Council. 3. Existing home located on Lot 1 encroaches on minimum 10 foot side lot offset. Variance must be approved by Lino Lakes City Council. 4. The existing Drainage and Utility Easements must be vacated. Miscellaneous Comments: 1. A copy of the MPCA - NPDES Permit must be provided to the City of Lino Lakes. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Reference: Golden Acre Drainage Review Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Proj. No.: 13604.005 Date: September 14, 2006 Routing: The following review is based on these submittals: 1. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, submitted by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated August 23, 2006, revised September 6, 2006. 2. Drainage Calculations, submitted by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated September 6, 2006. Drainage Review Comments: All comments have been addressed. Additional comment (no response required) The proposed 10 -year and 100 -year rates for the site do not exceed predevelopment rates; however, the 2 -year rate is exceeded by 0.07 cfs. The 2 -year event increase in rate is due to runoff flowing north to Arlo Lane, and south to Lois Lane. According to the model, runoff from the proposed site that flows to the east will be fully contained in the infiltration areas, and therefore will not discharge to the east for the 2 -year (and 10 -year) event. As a result, infiltration areas would be required in the front yards in order to reduce the 2 -year discharge by 0.07 cfs. Since the increase in rate for the 2 -year storm event is not significant, the City finds the current design acceptable. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • Environmental • • Memo To: Paul Bengtson From: Marty Asleson Date: August 3, 2006 Re: August 2 Environmental Board Recommendations The following recommendations were made concerning Golden Acre: Although the site is not large enough for the RCWD to review, recommend following standard guidelines for addition of impervious. That is an infiltration area must be provided to infiltrate the impervious area from the Mpls -St. Paul median storm (.34 inches) in 72 hours. This area could be in the form of a rain garden between the 4 houses with as much impervious area as possible directed to it. The infiltration area must be protected from compaction before construction begins. The grading plan shows the surface water flowing to the neighbor lot. The grading plan should be changed to reflect on site storage /infiltration of water. The infiltration area should be in the form of a rain garden and the design approved by the City A SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) and a MPCA permit are required for this project. The SWPPP must be submitted to the City for approval before any soil disturbance occurs, as well as the MPCA permit. The SWPPP must be located on site (Preferably a mail box) with weekly and post rain fall event inspection reports. The developer did submit an erosion control plan (Attachment 4). The erosion plan should be made more comprehensive to address pollution issues such as concrete truck cleaning and litter containment. The plan needs to show a concrete truck wash site that is protected by containment barriers. All wash out must be removed from the site after construction. The plan signature is the responsible person that will inspect and correct deficiencies. The name and 24 hour phone number of this person must be added to the plan. Location of the required rock entrance must be shown on the plan. • Page 1 • • • Storm sewer catch basins need to be protected with an Infrashield type of device. Silt fabric will not be allowed. The SWPPP needs to be very site specific. With out revision, the project should not be allowed to move forward. An inventory of significant trees should be submitted with s tree preservation plan. Escrow one boulevard tree per house No soils should be imported or exported without City approval. Motion to approve recommendations by Norman, 2nd by Grundhoffer. All were in favor. • Page 2 • • 4--- • DNS t COUR O I S Olnulamka SURFACE) L A N E ORD in an-Me fe`IN 1 Lob s m Rst 1.0C417 4 MAP mar 1D SOME SITE Los IA SECTION 8. TOWNSHIP 31. RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, NMINMOTA. LISG$ND DEPOSES 1/2 MON By to INCH RON PPE NosMENT NASA NY MOM NO. 17705 • D jwi6' MON PPE RIM . DENIMS FRE HYDRANT A IN E00713 SANITARY IbiaNI E DENOTES CURD STOP • DENDIES NEIL DENOTES FENCE —► — ODIOUS FENCE NOVD VERACAL DATUM X Mb DENOTES DOSING ELEVARONS LEGAL: Lot 4, Block 1, MAR DON AIRES. Anoka Oountic Minnesota NOTES For the purposes of fhb army, the south In* of Lot 4. 89 dowse MAR DON ACIM, hes an assumed minutes 24 seconds West �s� of North TJUI. loathed on the north tide of Arlo Lone aeroas from Lot 5, Mock 1, MAR DON ACRES. EL -91234 (NGVD 1929) 7OTALAREs 1.11 Muss (4D1510 Sq.Ft.) co to 0110.11 JLAA V. G a 2 ZF.10.015 6129/0( B-1 ARLO LANE / sas-zrss'a feS.DD 01 4, RECEIVED JUN 3 0 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES SAWN 1 Ieel Ib 1wt Lot 4, Block 1, MAR DON ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesota NOTES For the purposes of ads survey, the aau81 Me of Lot 4, Rook 89 degrees „ North ees 27 minutes 24 seconds Subject to easements of record If any BEIVGFI2VIARK T.N.H. located an the north Ode of Arlo Lane across from Lot 5, Block 1. MAR DON MORES. EL 912.34 71:7TAL AREA 1.11 Acres (46,510 Sq.FL) EXIIETTNG ZONING A -1 RESIDENTIAL R -1 (SINGLE' FAMILY) TOTAL ACREAGE - 43.560 uq.1t TOTAL NUMBER LOTS - 4 PET DENSITY - .25 UNITS /ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE • 10090 .q.ft. - MAIaMUY LOT SOX = 43.004 sq.ft. - 0.99 aces AVERAGE LOT SEE = 14.721 sq.R . 0.34 acres (Exdudin9 RP/0 - 1.00 0.25 acres ages LOCATION MAP NOT 10 SCALE WI;uff- snt 'r'a++ ,rA SECTION E. TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. OAWER/DEVEW. ' R TIM ANDERSON 547 L0I5 LANE LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA 55014 (715) 386-5050 RNGG BY: METRO LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 248 APOLLO DRIVE UND LAKES, MINNESOTA 55014 -3038 (763) 398 -683D CONTACT: THOMAS HAILEY SURVEYING BY: METRD LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 248 APOLLO DRIVE LINO LAMS, MINNESOTA 55014 -3036 (763) 398-6830 CONTACT: ERICK ORTIZ R -1. MOUSE OR.DThANC s SETBACK AM" FRONTAGE INFORMA77ON FRONT AND CORNER LOTS: 35 FEET FRONT ON COLLECTOR STREET (WS LANEA 40 FEET REAR YARD: 3D FEET SIDE YARD: 1D FEET MINIMUM LOT MT11 AT SETBACK UNE. 80 FEET VARIANCES' A:) LOT 2 = LOT MIIDTN 1D 77.5D FEET B:) LOT 1 = S10EYARD SETBACK TO 6.3 FEET TYPICAL EASEMENTS: TYPICAL DRAINAGE & MUTT EASEMENT { STREET 10.00 J 5.00 vARIABLE1 L 10.00 65.00 MARUBLE t REAR UNE t BENS ID FELT 11 IOWA AD,A1*IC STREET LINES AND 6 FEET N ROW AND ADJOURNS SITE LOT INES AID NEAR UNE EA5OIDOS AIE REFLECTED ON DRAWS UNLESS 0114RTNg SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 0 • 4 NOR O x SOLI LEGEND moue SR 1101 BY u NCH RCN PPE NOMREHT YAARI00® BY LICENSE ND. Me6 DEMON RON PIPE FOH DENOTES FIE HYDRANT DENDYES SANITARY MANHOLE DORM CURD STOP DEMOBS NELL CORTES FENCE DENOTES FENCE %FRUGAL DATUM ODIOUS EOSTDfr. CLEYA1I fn W H Z (/) Z Z CC Z W 2 N Z 0 1, QrQ i..- C Z W N W .CCZ Z =Lkj 0 c�$ 3 .sao.7 1 ZF.10 —O DAT 6(28/( PP -' Z Q J 0 w (D J 0 Q co 0 C5Z zo oN Q0 ( J GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN • ARLO LAN / s8r2r24"z 65.00 is 0 CD cs I (/ VS • j � J NOTE DRAINAGE ALONG SIDE LOT UNES SHALL BE DIRECTED INTO INFILTRATION SWALES WITHIN EACH LOT. DRAINAGE SHALL NOT BE DIRECTED ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. Wdl 0 so ao LOT 3 LFE: 910.9 LOT 4 LFE: 910.7 W et LOT 2 LFE: 910.9 LFE: 911.3 VITY EASEMENT, r- • (\b I-- EXISTING FENCE (TO BE SAVED) g to 0 o S8 -IX CURB & GUTTER 165.00 LOIS LANE (BINMINOUS SURFACE) /--EX_ CURB & GUTTER qt T FFNf:E RFO(IIREMFNT5 FABRIC AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 3888 8' MAXIMUM SPACING BETWEEN STAKES 2' MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF STAKES 1' MINIMUM EMBEDMENT CF FABRIC 30T3'X5 MINIMUM DO8D4StCNS OF WOOD STAKES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE PER MNDOT SPEC. 3886 ZILT FENCE WOOD POST MLSE No, 500 GRADING LEGEND SF EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS SILT FENCE DRAINAGE ARROW RAIN GARDEN INFILTRATION AREA GRADING NOTES SELO SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PROPOSED HOUSE TYPE (SPLIT ENTRY LOOK OUT) GAR: 912.0 PROPOSED GARAGE ELEVATION PROPOSED LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION LFE 907 .9_- PROPOSED LOWEST OPENING ELEVATION L0: 911.9�'� PROPOSED CONTOURS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSED CURB DENOTE GUTTER UNE OF CURB. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS AND, WHERE POSSIBLE. MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (1- 800 - 252 - 1166) 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE TREES TO BE SAVED. SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE 1REE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY UMBS, THE BROKEN LIMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE. NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION BY THE ENGINEER. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. CONTRACTOR SHALL. STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE- SPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM FOUR INCH DEPTH TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. THE PROPOSED GRADING PLAN INDICATES FINAL GRADING AFTER THE HOUSES ARE CONSTRUCTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A HOLDDOWN OF 2.5' ACROSS THE BUILD PAD LOCATIONS DURING THE GENERAL GRADING OF THE SITE. THE FINISHED BUILDING SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.10 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE PROPOSED ELEVATION. STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION. AREAS TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO YATHIN 0.10 FEET OF THE REQUIRED ELEVATION UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY - NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPOES) PERMIT. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE A C0- APPUCANT WTTH THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIRED INSPECTION REPORTS AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES EROSION CONTROL NOTES ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON THE SITE HAVE BEEN RESTORED. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL TO BE PLACED AROUND STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY AND MUST BE REMOVED IF DESIGN CAPACITY HAS BEEN REDUCED BY FIFTY PERCENT. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR DURATION OF PROJECT. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER, NOT TO BE SODDED AND GREATER THAN EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT, SHALL HAVE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC INSTALLED. STREETS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SEDIMENT CARRIED BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT TO BE SODDED. SEEDING SHALL. BE PER MnDOT SPECIFICATION 3876 APPUED AT A RATE OF FIFTY POUNDS PER ACRE. SEEDING IN POND AND INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE MIXTURE 310NWT (NATIVE NET TALL) IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT SPECIFICATION 3876 APPLIED AT A RATE OF 82 POUNDA PER ACRE. MULCH SHALL BE PER MnDOT SPECIFICATION 3882, TYPE 2. THE MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT SPECIFICATION 2575.3, F1. MULCH TO BE APPUED AT A RATE OF TWO TONS PER ACRE. MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED 811)1 A DISC, CLODBUSTER OR OTHER APPROVED EQUIPMENT. ;In; pb E▪ 8t • sz N Z O N wc°d Q 1- Z 0 Z z Q eL JK. K. Wvy Z -w QTY ;f4;J J w Of 0 Z w Y] J 0 LINO LAKES, MN DESIGNED KG DRAM KG PROJECT 1805 -001 DOE 08/23/06 1/1 • • '§ UTILITY PLAN L RL O L1 it ♦ L 1 f� I S89"27. 24"E - 165.00_ —amc San UM Is -01.16 .-- MAILBOX RACKS (BITUMINOUS SURFACE) 1 -EX CURB & GUTTER -' O 20 40 SCA M CS O 3 4 < • h Xrt X FENCE 2 00 D R I N A G E INTER 05nc (10 E T w0i _n RcxO 0 ®160 S89'27`24"E I 4.01 SOW �00<fN w T me el 1N wuc Mtn 0631.01) 0,174:011.0. 0.61.115,510110 100/710r DECK 6.27 ( -- -PVC VENT f rumu LOCAL ' "®: 6 1 COWCCIGD 9 '64 EXISTING HOUSE --�E- -6.35 • a+ M /0351/10 E Wel Im NO 111201., 116161600175 10101 T lie I T Y E SEMEN T 1 O 6m b(Tt 02TMOl.n i ml =neap —EX CURB & GUTTER 65.00 EXISTING DRIVE • 5 W ErE ; (BITUMINOUS SURFACE) 1 1 I 1 1 EX. CURB & GUTTER / 1 r '5 CS 0 • Son n REntaliale r- LEGEND UTILITY NO 1 ES SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING WATEMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATEMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. AU. EXISTING U11UTY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' (651- 454 -0002) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. UTIUTY CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION' AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. mot— — CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS TO BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. TuO.c ..minoann CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS TO BE SUMPED 0.08 FEET PER DETAILS. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR U11U11ES, UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED. ► 0 ► oneruE nnuRE rim LX1Daa E M04 SEM 0071110011 TD 0001LTT TO 0141116 YAM. ► ► —MUM tales_ GJ1 5 •1. RE.a o — NE.209.45 I 1 ue16000E /+63.1,0630.. 010610N 1 0101010 /-0001 MISS 6/ OP, WAT611/0•1 SANITARY SEWER WYES SHALL BE 8 INCH BY 4 INCH SCHEDULE 40. SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 4 INCH SCHEDULE 40. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE TO BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (P.V.C.) SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 111 N Z 0 ut s 8 (1) W cc 0 Z W 0 J 0 0 LINO LAKES, MN UTILITY PLAN DaIGNED KG onAnn KG PROEM 1 1805.001 DATE 07/24/06 EKE, 1/1 • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V.B. Paul Bengtson October 11, 2006 Final Plat Junes Addition Wayne Junes has requested approval of a residential development called Junes Addition. The plat includes 3 residential lots. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake Drive. The final plat generally conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on July 12, 2004 with Resolution 04 -94. All of the conditions of approval from the preliminary plat have already been addressed, or will be addressed as part of the development agreement. The title commitments have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Junes Addition. ATTACHMENTS 1. Final Plat submitted April 28, 2006. • • • 0 O O 52958'25 "E 3756.85 Opt- S89"58'25 "E 229.95 , 1 m4 n N and n cl 4 - •Net :.o" 0 330,10 110.08 l ? • S00)1• •-,v•W r) Wet Lano-_ "' �i41+ 1 I .•\ l .9C JI w_� o �O °�5• BIock' 11 - - 340.69- - - 1 _ - 163.31 -- - --- 110.01' . 589'58'25 "E 110.01 5. n.dnt .Ile ` O 0 vret Long' 1389'45'55"W 1,0 0.7 :N89 "58'25 "W 1 .. 560.71 e.. 10. IO m n 110 01 .est corner of Norneest Quarter of iec,c^. 32, 731, 922 Strum a of the ;outs »est Quarter of the Nortreox' Quarter of Section 32, '31, '22 Sou tneast Corner of the West 1'2 of the East Half of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 32, '3!. 922. Junes Addition J _ - :1.19'58'25"E '651.96 Southease Corner 01 Northeast '3uor:er - of >ect•un 32. T31. 922 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: fhat Wayne 1). Junes and Alice C. Junes, husband and wile as Joint Tenants. fee owners of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka. State of Minnesota, to-wit: The South 650.00 leer of the East half of the Wcst half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 31. Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the West 100.00 feet thereof, and EXCEPT the South 40.00 feet thereof; AND The South 650.00 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County. Minnesota, EXCEPT the North 220.00 feet thereof, and EXCEPT the South 40.00 feet thereof. (lave caused the same to be surveyed and platted as JUNES ADDITION and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever, the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on the plat. In witness whereof, said Wayne D. Junes and Alice C. Junes, husband and wife, have hereunto set their hands this _ day of , 2006. Wayne D. Junes Alice C. Junes STATE OF MINNESOTA) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of COUNTY OF ) 2006, by Wayne D. Junes and Alice C. Junes, husband and wife. Notary Public. County, Minnesota My Commission expires 1 hereby certify that 1 have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as JUNES ADDITION, that this plat is a correct representation of the survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot, that all monuments will be correctly placed in the ground as designated, that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat, and that there are no wet lands as defined in MS 505.02, Subd. 1. or public highways to be designated other than as shown. Tcdd W. Mattke, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 15612 STATE OF MINNESOTA) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of COUNTY OF _ ) , 2006, by Tedd W. Mattke, Land Surveyor. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission expires 1 hereby certify that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, duly accepted and approved the plat of JUNES ADDITION at a regular meeting held this _ day of , 2006. If applicable, written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City, or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City of Lino Lakes Anoka County, Minnesota; By , Mayor By , City Manager Checked and Approved this day of , 2006. By , Anoka County Surveyor. �'1tv of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 32, T.31, R.22 GRAPHIC SCALE 50 :00 200 400 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 feet ;.;,GTE: FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT, THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, T31, R22 IS ASSUMED TO BEAR 589'58'25 "E RECEIVED F4 APR 2 8 2006 CITY OF uNo LAKES (J DENOTES AN ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT 0 DENOTES 1/2" IRON PIPE SET AND MARKED BY MINNESOTA LICENSE NO. 15612 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: 'o NO SCALE BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. Mattke Surve ying & Engineering, Inc. • AGENDA ITEM V.0 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: October 11, 2006 TOPIC: Planned Unit Development - Final Plan Legacy Townhomes Second Addition BACKGROUND Hartford Group Inc. has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a portion of the townhome property within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and Lake Drive. ANALYSIS Building Plans 410\ typical final plan application consists of the building plans for the units and the final plat of a portion of the townhome property. However, this is the second phase of the project and therefore the building plans approved for the first phase will be continued in this part of the project. This will clearly be included within the development agreement for the site. Final Plat The final plat for the second addition is substantially conforming to that shown during the first addition, the only difference being the dedication of a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the lots surrounding the townhomes. This is a cleaner process for defining the easements and was suggested by staff prior to application. The applicant is vacating the drainage and utility easements recorded on Outlot B of the Village No. 3 plat, which will go through a first reading at the November 13th City Council meeting and will then have a second reading prior to this item on the November 27th City Council. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer will enter into a development agreement with the city prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. This agreement shall clearly require that the conditions of Resolution 06 -119 still apply to this site. 2. The vacation of drainage and utility easements on Outlot B of Village No. 3 must be approved and recorded prior to this final plat being recorded. ATTACHMENTS 1. Legacy Townhome Final Plat received September 11, 2006. LEGACY TOW-4OtS • AT WOODS =GM SECOND ADDITION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Legacy Holdings —LL, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability company, fee owner of the following described property situated in the City of Lino Lakes, State of Minnesota, County of Anoka. to wit: Outlot C, LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE, Anoka County, Minnesota. And Outiot B, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE SECOND ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat LEGACY HOLDINGS —LL, LLC In witness whereof said Legacy Holdings —LL. LLC, a Minnesota limited Liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by Its proper officer this day of 200_. / Chief Manager / / ■ John C. Brandt / Saoa` STATE OF MINNESOTA cd+ / / \ O COUNTY OF u',0 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 200 • by John C. Brant, as chief manager of \ �O LP Legacy Holdings —LL, 110, a Minnesota Limited Liability company, on behalf of the company. / / ,� / \ My Commission Expires r \ � \oon° N 1 • \ / \ / `\\ / tot,' \ / / sf- OpG4 / a' G. / / ° o �,ti� toa+ / r No' ''wd , n / m, / sS �� y' 4' i. City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 11, T31, 1R22 0 ch 10° g.89 "75� a° 0 o 60 30 u O Notary Public, County, Minnesota I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE SECOND ADDITION; that this plat is a correct representation of said survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments will be correctly placed in the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on said plat and that there are no wet lands as defined In Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 505.02 Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated other than as shown on said plat Eric R. Vickaryous, Land Surveyor Minnesota Registration No. 44125 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 200 , by Eric R. Vickaryous, Land Surveyor. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires This plot of LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE SECOND ADDITION was approved by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 200_ and If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By Mayor By This plat has been checked and approved this day of Larry D. Holum Anoka County Surveyor All monuments required by Minnesota Statute, and not shown on this plat, will be set within one year of the recording date of this plot, and shall be evidenced by a 1/2 inch by 18 inch iron pipe marked by RLS 44125. For the purposes of this plat the northwesterly line of Outlot C, LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE, Anoka County, Minnesota, Is assumed to hove a bearing of N64°54'10 °E. City Clerk NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 60 rT s._i 0 (3: - o ON r1 y -- LA ' f la m 09. tn rn 1.11 "4 N N so so w r ,." F/ n 1,033 °28'01 "E r ,, r1-266 I :_i 1L `=" 1tt 60 ,— I I I I I I I I 1 ;:7 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 6D I ;z I 1 1 1 1 I • 1 `-- —� I , I I., I I I,, 1 I=' 1 I -- 1 1 1 .•% 1 11 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 L- L 1_ _ '_L _ __I L J sO ,60 (1N FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft CD ■ F__ S87 °18'36 "E 117.78 rv. 42/47 I I I .• -� 1 I I 149.45 — —1 - ` � — _ L ECEIVE — ; Of' 1 LO 1 r- m es so SEP 11 2 .11 P1 6 CITY OF LI ' LAKES " ROE.I E.G. . RU a SONS, INC. STS" Professional Land Surveyors LEGACY ToW-4Or1E T 1000D3 EDGE SECON1 WET LAND NORTH Ali GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 200 Ixtx --- �i N04 °43'27 "W ( 111 FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. Pao 140.46 N01 °50'01 aQ 55" o 5516 C ° 6' Oj ,I) co. 2 41 _ Sib 36 City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 11, T31, R22 �PaD O�Y 70'109 6 � c) •et �240.60— Pao `\. N07°141.8 "W 2 43 Drainage and Utility Easement dedicated throughout Lot 43 • N 756.67 o „ 0.p0 ,53 g7.21 506 52 OB E S06 °5208 "E 5- 3 158.67 503°11'56 "E 158.67 281.71 �oM toW _ T I j 1:11 18 1 I I L _ J-_ L� i- i__L_ � 95°. \ \ \ THE VILLk.CiE \ • i- - - ---1 1- - - -7 --- 1 7 1 I 11. I I- - - – – -I L ___ _I . -;',- `,-1 1- - - -H ;h I 1 11 I - - - --I I- - - - -H _ =- 0 S89 °33'45 "E ! \ \ —L— DENOTES RIGHT —OF— ACCESS DEDICATED TO ANOKA COUNTY OR THE STATE OF MINNESOTA ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF "THE VILLAGE NO. • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT MARKED AS MARKED R.L.S.#44125 All monuments required by Minnesota Statute, and not shown on this plat. will be set within one year of the recording date of this plat, and shall be evidenced by a 1/2 inch by 18 Inch iron pipe marked by RLS 44125. 3 For the purposes of thls plat the northwesterly line of Outlot C, LEGACY TOWNHOMES AT WOODS EDGE. Anoka County. Minnesota, is assumed to have a bearing of N64 °54'10 "E. 180.00 S00 °08'37"W i 1- RECEIVED SEP 1 1 2006 T ~' OF LINO LAKES dr LEG. MID it SONS, INC. X191 Professional Land Surveyors • AGENDA ITEM 5D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: October 11, 2006 TOPIC: Variance Request Lot Area, Lot Width, Lot Depth and Road Frontage requirements St. Paul Regional Water Services BACKGROUND St. Paul Regional Water Services has requested approval of variances for required road frontage, minimum lot area, minimum lot depth, and minimum lot width to allow the division of the subject sites by a future administrative minor subdivision. The attached location map designates the sites as parcels 1— 4, and 16 on Peltier Lake and parcels 6, 14, and 15 on Centerville Lake, and these designations will be used throughout this report to differentiate the sites. The city granted similar variances for other St. Paul Regional Water Service's parcels in 2004. The intention of the application is to allow the shoreland parcels to be divided in the future (via minor subdivision) and sold to adjacent property owners for combination into existing parcels. Additionally, the City of Centerville is purchasing a portion of the land within parcel 14 for park development. •ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Parcel 16 (Peltier Lake) Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential R (Rural) Parcel 1 (Peltier Lake) Vacant Low Density Unsewered Residential R (Rural) Parcel 2 (Peltier Lake) Vacant Public / Semi Public R (Rural) Parcel 3 (Peltier Lake) Vacant Public / Semi Public R (Rural) Parcel 4 (Peltier Lake) Vacant Public / Semi Public & Low Density Sewered Residential R (Rural) Parcel 6 (Centerville Lake) Vacant Undesignated Undesignated Parcel 14 (Centerville Lake) Vacant Public / Semi Public R -1 (Single Family Residential) Parcel 15 (Centerville Lake) Vacant Public / Semi Public R -1 (Single Family Residential) North Vacant & House of Worship Low Density Sewered Residential & Low Density Unsewered Residential Rural South Vacant & Single Family Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) East Single Family & Agricultural Low Density Sewered Residential & Low Density Unsewered Residential R- 1(Single Family Residential) & R (Rural) West Lake N/A N/A Ank The designation of some of these parcels as Public / Semi - Public will delay the completion of the land transfers with the adjacent residents, as the city will need to amend the Comprehensive Plan to change these parcels to a more appropriate category (typically the same as the adjacent land). This request will likely be heard at the November Planning and Zoning Board meeting. St. Paul Regional Water Services, page 2 ()Lot Requirements: The minimum requirements within the existing zoning districts are as follows: • • In addition, the subdivision ordinance requires that `all lots shall have frontage on an improved public street that provides the required lot width at the minimum front yard setback'. FINDINGS In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. These parcels are completely surrounded by the lake, right of way, or adjoining private property; and would not be able to be developed as usable parcels due to the sizes or lack of road frontage. b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The physical shape, location and isolated nature of the parcels prevent use for most anything except for lake access for the adjoining property owners. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Economic considerations is not a major factor in this proposal, the intent is to minimize the applicant's lakeshore holdings for the future. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. There are very few other situations that can be compared to this one. Land locked parcels owned and operated almost exclusively for public purposes would receive the same consideration. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Combining these properties with the adjacent landowner's parcels will in no way violate the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance. R (Rural) R -1 (Single Family Residential) Minimum Lot Area 10 Acres 10,800 square feet Minimum Lot Width 330 feet 80 feet (100 feet corners) Minimum Lot Depth Not applicable 135 feet In addition, the subdivision ordinance requires that `all lots shall have frontage on an improved public street that provides the required lot width at the minimum front yard setback'. FINDINGS In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. These parcels are completely surrounded by the lake, right of way, or adjoining private property; and would not be able to be developed as usable parcels due to the sizes or lack of road frontage. b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The physical shape, location and isolated nature of the parcels prevent use for most anything except for lake access for the adjoining property owners. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Economic considerations is not a major factor in this proposal, the intent is to minimize the applicant's lakeshore holdings for the future. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. There are very few other situations that can be compared to this one. Land locked parcels owned and operated almost exclusively for public purposes would receive the same consideration. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Combining these properties with the adjacent landowner's parcels will in no way violate the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance. St. Paul Regional Water Services, page 3 •RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the following conditions: 1. The properties can not be divided through the minor subdivision process until the comprehensive plan has been amended to change the designation of the properties from Public / Semi - Public to an appropriate category. 2. When ownership of these properties changes hands the new owner(s) are required to combine them with adjacent parcels to avoid creating a new parcel. • • ATTACHMENTS 1. Area map 2. Parcel sketch and legal descriptions • Board of Water Commissioners Centerville/Peltier Lakes w w LU 0 z 0 0 • LEGEND 21 Parcel sold to Anoka County 0 Deed of conveyance to City of Saint Paul N 19 S SPRWS Land Map 1%4 rIrrit 1137 x • • ...•, • . „ , I op OP .Asskir fr 47 FrAiniimu an INE fr'. viiiimillie Ls Ed, ...L.. — ammumr itiA .:-.7..11.11,111•74 1.11211111107111,111.: ts 1151 247% 1114-*/17:11"11:1°."91:7Nur:dalki ill 1,7 T -II : Nein •id.i innio.. d AI How ..01 .1.1 o 46.4, —4,1.7.- a...,hion A'ai rim min .....,„„„..,,, Nu mall'01 a r 1 i I • r. _1 2., p11111111 111"gmil , Vjoh,..- wail • 7 .11::: .5 ....10 .xv ID. 4, E pi ...... ..... ..... 7111 7111:11.11 149A imam g; mak Via IN 1111.11 Eirru. r is 11 a .... .41, 0,1210111111116 11111111111111M ,d4t ft-4 DATE 8/3/2006 DRAWN BY: D. MARRUFFO CHECKED BY: B. TSCHIDA SKETCH OF POSSIBLE MINOR SUBDIVISIONS FOR ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SERVICES SURPLUS SHORELINE STRIPS 1 inch = 200 feet Current Date: Jul 11, 2006 Date of Photography: April, 2005 S 1/2 SECTION 11, T.31, R.22 CITY OF LINO LAKES Prepared ajWa Comp,oIs l Existing Legal Descriptions 1. All the land in the S. 'A of the S. 'f, of lot 1, Sec. 11, Town 31 N. Range 22 W., lying between the low water line of Peltier Lake and the following described line: Commencing at a point on the S. line of lot 1, section 11, town 31 N., range 22 W., at a distance of 170 feet W. of the S.E. corner of said lot 1, thence N. 6 degrees 16 minutes W. 535 feet, thence N. 18 degrees 16 minutes W. 139 feet to a point on the N. line of the S. IS of S. %s of said lot 1 and at a distance of 272 feet W. of the E. line of said lot I, thence W. along the N. line of the S '/s of S. Y of said lot_] to the low water line of Peltier lake, thence southeasterly along the said low water line to the intersection with the S. line of said lot 1, thence E. along the S. line of said lot 1 to place of beginning, containing 1 acre more or less, said land being that portion colored yellow on plat number 3 of the Seventh Series of Extension of the St. Paul Water Works, which is on file in the office of the register of deeds of Anoka County. (A.K.A. Lot 7, Auditor's Subdivision Number 55, Revised) 16. Commencing at a point 1320 feet south of the N.W. comer of lot 1 in section 11 of township 31 of range 22; from then running east 825 feet; thence running S.E. `ly to a point 165 feet west of the North and S. center line of said section 11, and 660 feet N. of the S. line of said section 11; from thence ruming W. to the shore of Peltier lake; from thence naming N. W.'ly. along the shore of Peltier lake to Rice creek; from thence running S. W'ly along the shore of Peltier lake until it intersects the N. and S. quarter line running through the center of the S. W. V, of said section 11; from thence running N. on said quarter line to the place of beginning, containing five and nine - tenths acres (5.9), more or less. (AKA Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision Number 55, Revised. i'ARC L. E30UNflA>,t ' - - - = PQSS \ B\ E SPLIT :. LIN E LOW N/4 AMS.Ck 1_1KE 1S A.41)ROMMATC ONLY S1.10W N FoR L-1RAP•k'G, PtiR9OSGS 01?LY I hereby certify that this survey, plan orrepon:was prepared by the or' under my direct supen?ision and that I inc a duly Licensed Land Surveyor.un der the laws of the State of Minnesota Date 3VI••s`(. {Li ZOO(.n.._:y L. Kurth , Licensed land Surveyor No.20270 Russell 1. Kurth, Licensed land Surveyor No. 15113 KURTH SURVEYING, nvc. 4002 JEFFERSON.SI'. N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 PHONE: (763)7594769 FAX: (763)750 -7602 9arlbsarvey®aoLeom WI. 1.31 -81re (4wac.ta tb7 22 SKETCH OF POSSIBLE MINOR SUBDIVISIONS FOR ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SERVICES SURPLUS SHORELINE STRIPS RECEIVED 06-'1 5-48-06- crry OF LINO LAKES 1 inch = 200 feet Current Date: Jul 11, 2006 Date of Photography: April, 2005 N 1/2 SECTION 14, T31, R.22 CITY OF LINO LAKES Existing Legal Descriptions, 2. All the land in the N. 'A of lot 1, Sec. 14. town 31 N., range 22 W., lying between the low water line of Peltier Lake and the following described land: Commencing at a point on the S. line of the N. i4ofIotl,sec. 14, town 31 N., range 22 W., at a distance of 1592 feet W of the S.E. comer of the N. 'A of said lot 1 and 16.5 feet W. of the highway as now laid out and traveled through the N. 14 of said lot 1, thence N. 15 degrees, 41 minutes E. 301 feet, thence N. 5 degrees, 47 minutes E. 301 feet, thence N. 6 degrees, 16 minutes W. 65 feet lo a point on the S. line of lot 1. section 11, town and nuige aforesaid to a point distant 170 feet W. of the S.E. comer of lot 1. Section 11, town and range aforesaid. thence W. along. the S. line of said lot 1, section 11 to the low water line of Peltier lake, thence southwesterly along said low water line to the intersection with the S. line of the N. 14 of said lot 1, section 14, thence E along the said S. line of N. Y. of said lot 1 to place of beginning, containing 1 acre more or less. said land being That portion colored yellow on platnumber 3 of the Seventh Series of Extension of the St. Paul Water Works, which is on file in the office of the register of deeds of Anoka County. • All the land in the S. 54 of lot 1 section 14, town 31 N., range 22 W., lying between the low water line of Peltier lake and the following described line: Commencing on the S. line of the S. 54 of lot 1, section 14, town 31 N., nmge 22 W., at a distance of 1740 feet W. of the S.E. corner of the 5.14 of said lot 1, said point being 16.5 feet W. of the center of the highway as now laid out and traveled through the said S. 54 of lot 1, thence N. 11 degrees; 14 minutes E. 277 feet, thence N. 13 degrees 44 minutes E. 396 feet to a point on the N. line of the S. %.of said lot 1, said point being 1592 feet W. of the N.E. comer of S. :4 of • • said lot 1 and 16.5 feet W. of the center of said highway running through said lot 1, thence W. along the N. line of said lot 1 to the low water line of Peltier lake, thence southwesterly along the said low water line to the intersection with the S. line of said lot 1. thence E • along the S. line of said lot 1 to place of beginning, containing 03 acre, more or less, said land being that portion colored yellow on plat number 3 of the Seventh Series of Extension of the St. Paul Water Works, which is on file in the office of the register of deeds of Anoka County. • 4. All of the land in lot 2, section 14, town 31 N., range 22 W., lying between the low water line of Peltier lake and a line described as follows: commencing at a point on the S. line of • . lot 2, section 14, town 3114., range 22 W., at a distance of 698 feet westnf the N.E. corner - of lot 3 of said section 14, thence N. 23 degrees. 29 minutes E. 481 feet, thence N. 3 degrees, 59 minutes E. 522 feet, thence N. 7 degrees, 44 minutes E. 370 feet to a point on " the 14. tine of said lot 2, thence W. along the N. line of said lot 2 to low water line of Peltier • ' lake, thence southwesterly along said low water line to the intersection with the S. line of . said lot 2, thence E. along the S. line of said lot 2 to the place of beginning, containing 2.7 • , acres more or less, said land being that portion colored yellow on plat number 3 of the Seventh Series of Extension of the St. Paul Water Works which is on file in the office of • the Register of Deeds of Anoka County and, as surveyed and staked out upon the ground. - poss■z,CE. .•PL1-r 1_0.4 v4h,-reSt. /441754.6% stekwr szvxust Kov4va cog, bnzAh?vicl Cit ? )0•5V9Cep. Ot4A—'-( I hereby certify Mat ibis survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision— and that 1 are a duly Licensed Land Surveyor un- der Me Jaws of tne Stare of tamesota. Date SQL( 14 Z.O. Randy L Kurth , Licensed Land Surveyor 148.20270 Russell J. Kurth, Licensed Land Surveri No. 16113 KURTI1 SURVEYING, INC. 4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 PHONE: 763)788-9769 FAX (763)788-7602 korthenrvey@noLeous 27 • • • SKETCH OF POSSIBLE MINOR SUBDIVISIONS FOR ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SERVICES SURPLUS SHORELINE STRIPS RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2006 _CITY OF LINO-LAKES 1 inch = 200 feet Current Date: Jul 11, 2006 Date of Photography: April, 2005 N 1/2 SECTION 22, T31, R.22 CITY OF LINO LAKES WF•• c-frz."1.=-1 . • . Uirenall.allicwatlam. • Ca......•■•••■•.,.• • Lot 1, Section 22, town 31 N., range 22, W. , lying between the low water line of Centerville lake and the following described land; Beginning at a point on the E. line of 1o14, section15, town 31 N.. range 22 W.. distant 1126 feet S. of the meander comer at the N.E. corner of said lot 4; thence S. 85 degrees W. 210 feet; thence S. 63 degrees 47 minutes W„ 238 feet; thence S. 26 degrees 47 minutes W. 300 feet; thence N. 86 degrees 13 minutes W., 142 feet; thence N. 56 degrees 58 minutes W., 583 feet; thence N. 63 degrees 58 minutes W., 400 feet thence N. 11 degrees E., 220 feet thence N. 59 degrees 56 minutes W., 111.5 feet to a point on the right of way of the St. Paul Water Works canal; thence Southwesterly along said right of way to the low water line of Centerville lake; thence South Easterly along said low water line to the E. line of said 101 4; thence N. on the E. line of said lot 4 to place of beginning containing 6.4 acres more or less, said land being that portion colored yellow on plat number 2 of the Seventh Series of Extension of the St. Paul Water Works, which is on file in the office of the Register of Deeds of Anoka County. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor uo- der the laws of the State of Minnesota. n. . Kurth Lic Land Survey° o. 20270 Russell J. Kurth, Licensed Land Surveyor No. 16113 KURTH SURVEYING, INC. 1002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 PHONE: (763)705-5769 FAX: (763)788-7602 imrtneurvey®aoLcom • SKETCH OF POSSIBLE MINOR SUBDIVISIONS FOR ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SERVICES SURPLUS SHORELINE STRIPS RECEIVED A-N-2L21106 env OF UNO LAKES 1 inch = 200 feet Current Date:Jul 11, 2006 Date of Photography: April, 2005 Existing Legal Descriptions A piece and parcel areal estate situated inaection twenty-two (22), Township 31, and Rattge4.2.; Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeasterly comer rifled six (6) of section twenty-two (22) of the aforesaid Townshinaind Range; thence south along the east line of said section twenty- tWo;(22) to the southeast corner of said lot six (6); thence west twenty-four and 75/100 (24.75) feet;•thence north and parallel with said east line of said lot six (6) to a point two hundred and Efty-seven and 9/10(257.9) feet south of the north Inc of the southwest cpiasim of aforesaid section twenty-three (23) if produced west to low water mark of said Centerville lake; thence nortlififty (50) degrees west a distance of one hundred and sixty (160) feetto a pOint;:thence south.forty (40) degrees west one hundred and seventy and • five tenths (1703)-feet to a point; thence south sixty-seven (67) degrees and fifty (50) minutes welt seven htmdred (700) feet; thence north twenty-two (22) degrees and ten (10) minutes west to an intersection with the low water mark of said Centerville Lake; thence northeasterly along low water mark to an intersection with the north line of said southwest Monet of the aforesaid section twenty-tluee (23) if extended westerly to said low Water mark; thence easterly along said line so extended to the place of beginning, said described tractctintaining two and 87/100 (2.87) acres, more or less. 15. All that portion of land in lot 6 section 22,town 31 N., range 22 W., lying within a line • described as follOWig rind= surveyed and staked out upon the ground: Beginning at the .S.W,coiner of 1016, section 22, town 31 N., range 22 W., thence 0881 300 feet along the • south line of 1o16, thence -Muth 9 degrees. and 35 minutes east 758 feet to the southwest corner of the tight tjf,way of the St. Patti Water Works, thence northwesterly along said tight of way to the low Water line of Centerville lake, thence northwesterly along said low water line to the west line oflot 6, thence south along the west line of lot 6 to the place of beginning containing 8.1 acres more or less, said land being that portion colored yellow on plat number 1 of the Seventh Series of Extensionof the St. Paul Water Works, which is on file in the office 011ie Register of Deeds of Anoka County. PARCEL '150UStARY — — = P055 \SLE. S7'1_17 \NI 1..7 ER. LANG NIPP RC' ob4A-si sv,ov4 t-t FOR r_ V 90 S 1/2 SECTION 22, T31, R822 CITY OF LINO LAKES CD ttir2,.1 -T., Prepared by Am*. Carroty OS Deporraml 1.■••■■• ■••■•••••••• 44 / riij4/q;2; 44,00WW/ , yth. 2,2,;/7' hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a dub Licensed Land Surveyor un- der the laws of the State of Minnesota. Randy L. Kurth , Licensed Land Surveyor o. 20270 Russell J. Kurth. Licensed Land Surveyor No. 16113 KURTH SURVEYING, INC 4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.H. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 PRONE: (763)705-5769 FAX: (763)78846112 kurthsurvey@aol.com • AGENDA ITEM V.E. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: October 11, 2006 TOPIC: Discussion Only Fran's Estate Variances for Lot Area and Front Setback Preliminary Plat BACKGROUND Fran Tourville has requested approval of the Fran's Estate plat. This project involves the division of an existing undeveloped parcel into two buildable lots. To accommodate this development proposal the applicant has requested a Preliminary Plat; and Variances for Lot Area (9,728 and 10,634 square feet instead of 10,800 square feet), and the reduction of the front setback from 40 feet to 25 feet. During the review of this application staff has identified many issues that make it impossible for staff to offer a recommendation at this time, therefore the public hearing required by state law for all preliminary plats was not scheduled for this meeting. However, staff scheduled this item for the October meeting so that discussion could 41,e held and staff could get the board's input on several of the issues. ANALYSIS The following is a summary of the proposal: Site Area 1.89 acres Total Lots 2 Density 1.06 units per acre Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 North Right of Way N/A N/A South Shenandoah Park Public / Semi - Public PSP East Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 West Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 Growth Management, MUSA Reserve: This property is already currently within the MUSA boundary. lipprowth Management, Units/Year: The table attached to this report shows the status of the staging plans for final platting new residential units. The new unit created by Fran's Estate would fit within the policy of 147 per year and so could be final platted in 2006. preliminary Plat Lots: The lots meet requirements for lot depth, lot width, and road frontage, but fall short of the 10,800 square feet of upland required for R -1 lots. Lot 1 is 166 square feet under the requirement and Lot 2 is 1,072 square feet under the requirement. This would result in a deviation of approximately 2% and 10% respectively. During staff s review of the application it was difficult to establish findings (as required by state law) to support such a reduction. State law requires the following finings to be made in order to grant the approval of a variance. Staff has completed the findings based on the initial submittal as follows: FINDINGS In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. This parcel could easily be developed with one single family dwelling at this time. • b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The plight in this instance is the lack of enough upland to create two buildable lots, therefore the landowner is creating this situation by trying to divide a lot and create two lots that do not meet the minimum requirements of the zoning ordinance. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. This property could have a reasonable use of a building site for one single family dwelling. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. This variance could easily set a precedent for future applicants to request reductions in upland area requirements. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would clearly be violated by allowing a lot to be created with less buildable area than is required. Setbacks: The applicant is proposing to deviate from the 40 foot front setback required for principal buildings in the R -1 zone along collector or arterial roadways. Birch Street is a County State Aid Highway and therefore qualifies as an arterial roadway. They are proposing 25 foot front setbacks for both of the new dwellings. Section 3 of the zoning ordinance allows the following: • Front Setbacks. Where principal buildings on adjoining Tots existed at the time of adoption of this Ordinance have a lesser setback from that required, the required front yard setback of a new structure shall not be less than the average front yard of the adjacent buildings on each side lot for four hundred (400) feet and in no case shall be less than twenty (20) feet. The submitted plat depicts the setbacks for the adjacent properties at 13.1 feet (to the existing right of way line) and 28.1 feet. Staff's interpretation of this ordinance is that because these setbacks are side /corner setbacks rather than front yard setbacks; that this provision would not apply to these lots. The proposed reduction of 37% would result in single family dwellings being built a mere 25 feet from the property line. While at the current width, this would mean a separation from Birch Street of over 50 feet; when/if Anoka County expands Birch Street the separation would be reduced to as little as 35 feet, and the road could be developed as a four lane divided highway. Furthermore, this would require the realignment of the city trail provided within the right of way to be placed right on the property line a mere 25 feet from the dwelling. Another issue surrounding the reduction of front setbacks is the size of the building pads provided on the submitted plans. The pad for Lot 1 is 65 feet wide and 55 feet deep. The pad for Lot 2 is 65 feet wide and 49 feet deep. These pads seem rather excessive for single family dwellings, in particular on lots that do not meet upland area requirements. If these pads were reduced in depth, then the setback could be increased. Again, with the setback variance the state mandated findings must be made. Staffs initial attempts to make Shese findings are as follows: FINDINGS In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. This parcel could easily be developed with one single family dwelling at this time that would meet the 40 foot setback. b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. While the impact of the wetland on the lot depth causes part of the need for reduced setbacks, the larger cause is the desire to divide the lot into two lots. This parcel could easily be developed with one single family dwelling at this time that would meet the 40 foot setback. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. This property would be able to be developed with one single family dwelling that would meet the 40 foot required setback. • d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. This variance could easily set a precedent for future applicants to request reductions in setbacks when lot depths are impacted by wetlands and when upland lot areas are minimized. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of the ordinance would clearly be violated by allowing reduced setbacks along a major arterial roadway. Streets: Birch Street is an existing road and no additional roads are being proposed. The existing road system can accommodate the traffic generated by the new homes, and the right of way is already dedicated to the required width of 60 feet from center line. Birch Street is a County State Aid Highway and acts as a major east to west arterial for the entire city. As such, the number of accesses for private drives and city streets should be minimized. In this case the proposal would require adding two driveway accesses. The subdivision ordinance requires that the following alternatives be addressed (in order) to limit accesses on arterial roadways: • New commercial, industrial, and multiple family lots fronting on an arterial or major collector street shall be designed to minimize the number of direct access points through the following methods listed in preferential order. If the highest preference is not possible, the next preference shall be utilized until an access method is possible. a. Access from a local street. b. Frontage road serving multiple properties. c. Frontage driveway or connected parking lot with cross easements serving multiple properties. d. Shared driveways. e. One driveway access, no closer than two hundred (200) feet to another driveway and that meets the City's minimum spacing standards from a street intersection. All driveways shall be reviewed for consistency with the access management guidelines of the Lino Lakes Transportation Plan. Staff therefore would require that the drives be consolidated into a shared drive should this application be approved. This would require the city to approve a variance to the driveway setback, but staff would readily support that type of request to limit the number of accesses for the site. . Landscaping: When abutting an arterial, residential developments are required to provide a `buffer MI/yard'. The zoning ordinance has very specific standards for buffer yards. The applicant will need to submit a landscaping plan that clearly meets these requirements. Park Dedication: The current subdivision ordinance includes park dedication in the amount of $2075 per residential unit, less any land dedication. There is no land dedication needed, as Shenandoah Park is nearby. The park dedication will be $2,075 x 2 new home lots = $6,225. �tilities: Sanitary sewer and water is already in place in Birch Street. Both of the proposed lots must connect to utilities. Onsite septic systems must be abandoned according to law. In addition, any existing wells likely will have to be capped because of proximity to new sanitary sewer lines. The property to the east is connected to the sewer line near the northeast corner of the subject site. The utility plan needs to be revised to indicate the location of this connection to verify that it lies within drainage and utility easements and that it will not conflict with the infiltration area indicated on the submitted plans. These and other issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. Grading & Drainage: The grading and drainage plans have been reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments will need to be addressed to his satisfaction prior to the site being developed. Specifically the engineer requested additional drainage information from the applicant to confirm that the drainage calculations where accurate. This information was received by the engineering department, but a review of that information could not be completed prior to this packet being distributed. Therefore that is an outstanding issue that prevents the city engineer from giving a recommendation at this time. The plan is also subject to review and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. Staff has received a copy of the CAPROC (Conditional Approval Pending Receipt Of Changes) from RCWD ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board's did not review this application due to its relatively small scope. • R• ECOMMENDATION This item can not be acted upon due to the fact that a Public Hearing must be held. This hearing will be scheduled for the November 8, 2006 meeting. Because of the following issues, staff has not determined what recommendation will be made at that meeting: 1. Engineering comments must be satisfied. 2. Landscaping plan must be submitted depicting conformance with buffer yard requirements. 3. All plans must be revised to depict a shared driveway. 4. All plans must be revised to depict a 10 foot easement buffer surrounding all wetlands. 5. All plans must be revised to depict a reduced building pad allowing a greater front setback. In addition to those issues, the following conditions would be recommended for any approval action for this proposal: 1. Existing onsite septic systems will be appropriately abandoned. Ilk. Existing wells shall be capped when required by Minnesota Dept. of Health requirements. 3. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 4. A development agreement between the city and the developer must be executed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 5. Park dedication must be paid in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 6. A permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District must be issued prior to final plat approval by the City. 7. Infiltration areas proposed on site should have the City native seed specification used. 8. A boulevard tree shall be provided for each lot frontage. 9. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement must be provided to buffer all delineated wetlands. 10. The drive accesses must be consolidated into a shared drive, with the approval of a variance to driveway setbacks. 11. A landscaping plan clearly depicting conformance with the buffer yard standards in Section 3.Q.5 must be submitted. �fhis review is based on the following plans and information: City Engineer Comments October 3, 2006 Preliminary Plat submitted September 11, 2006 Certificate of Survey submitted September 11, 2006 Resource Inventory Survey submitted September 11, 2006 Aerial Sketch Plan submitted September 11, 2006 Preliminary Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control, and Utility Plan submitted September 11, 2006 • as of July 24, 2006 remaining of annual 147 remaining of 1029 for pre -2010 • -1 -29 -24 5 82 147 147 327 Development Name approved prelim. plats Prelim Plat Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) I 2003 -09 total max. 1029 year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Stoneybrook 103 51 0 2nd Addn 0 52 52 Century Farms North 249 56 65 52 43 33 249 Keefe: prel plat, not final plat 1 1 1 Morton (minor subdiv) 0 1 0 1 Ravens Hollow 56 0 56 56 Haley Manor (10 new lots) 10 10 0 10 Crystal Cove 3 3 0 3 Millers Crossroads 152 22 47 51 32 152 Lakeview Estates (2 new) 2 2 2 Snell (minor subdivision) 0 1 1 Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th 1 1 1 Justin's Preserve 1 1 1 Marshan Estates 4 4 4 Rice Creek Church duplex 2 2 2 Rice Church: Oakwood View 10 10 10 Junes Addn 2 2 2 Highland Meadows East 2nd 18 18 18 Marshan Townhomes 2nd 23 23 Pheasant Hills 12th island 8 8 8 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add 1 1 1 Vaughan Addition 5 5 5 Angie's Acres (1 new) 1 1 1 Marshan Lakeview (2 new) 2 2 2 Marshan Meadows 20 20 20 Pine Glen 72 40 32 72 Cavegn (1 new lot) 1 1 1 Golden Acre (3 new lots) 3 3 3 Fran's Estate (1 new lot) 1 1 total 51 148 176 171 142 65 702 remaining of annual 147 remaining of 1029 for pre -2010 • -1 -29 -24 5 82 147 147 327 • O F Memorandum DATE: October 6, 2006 TO: Paul Bengston FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Fran's Estate Attached is the TKDA grading and drainage review dated October 5, 2006, of the submitted documents for the Fran's Estate project. Additional information has been submitted by the developer's engineer, we will provide a complete review of all submitted items. . Contact me at 651/982 -2430 with any questions, thank you. WO Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 TKDA NGINEERS I.CHITENERS MEMORANDUM To: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Reference: Fran's Estate Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Proj. No.: 13604.005 Date: October 5, 2006 Routing: 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota The following review is based on these submittals: 1. Preliminary Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control, & Utility Plan submitted by Plowe Engineering, Inc., dated September 11, 2006. 2. Drainage Calculations submitted by Plowe Engineering, Inc., dated May 17, 2006 and September 11, 2006. Drainage Review Comments: 01. As per a telephone conversation with Plowe Engineering on October 2, 2006, a drainage area map for the submitted models, labeled "04899tourville ", will be mailed to the City for review. 2. Submit infiltration basin sizing calculations for review. 3. Submit a geotechnical report for review. The low floor elevations are required to be a minimum of 4 feet above the seasonally high ground water table. 4. Include a note on the Grading Plan indicating that streets shall be kept free from-sediment carried by construction traffic. 5. Indicate the 10 foot wide wetland buffer, located from the wetland delineation to the proposed lawn areas, on the Grading Plan. Any grading in the buffer area shall be restored with native wetland vegetation. 6. Label the high water elevation of the on -site wetland on the Grading Plan. 7. Rice Creek Watershed District will need to give approval prior to the City issuing final approval. Submit a copy of the RCWD permit for the City's records. 8. Permit approval from the County may be required for this project. Submit a copy of the permit for the City's records. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity w0ESOURGE NVNTORY SURVEY F: FRAN' S ESTATE • • FOR: FRAN TOURVILLE 6948 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES MN PH# (651)- 786 -1884 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, SHENANDOAH, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part lying within PARCEL 18 of ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 11. LEGEND: e Denotes 1/2 inch by 18 inch Iron Pipe to be Set and Marked by R.L.S. number 25344 • Denotes Iron Found x1011.2 Denotes �------ Denotes • Denotes In Denotes • Denotes no., Denotes Denotes • Denotes El Denotes O Denotes Denotes —>-4 Denotes Denotes Science Denotes Existing Elevation Direction of Drainage Soil Boring Cable Box Mist Manhole Power Pole Overhead Powerline Sanitary Manhole Fiberoptic Fence Post Existing Contour 30 inch CMP Wet /and located by Earth Inc. Edge of Wet land by Earth AREAS: Total Boundary Area = 82,143± (1.89± Acres) Total Upland = 20,362± (0.48± Acres) Total Wetland = 61,781± (1.42± Acres) Total Right of Way = 1,950± (0.04± Acres) Science Inc. mum Denotes Existing Bituminous Rood, Access, and Trail Denotes Soil Type from Soil Survey by USDA Soil Conservation Service. See Sand Soil Survey for description of soil types. 1 Excluding R/W NOTES: Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of wetland is 885.1 per Emmons and Olivier Resources, contact Greg Graske (651)- 770 - 8448.. Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. Contours are at 2 foot intervals. N.G. V.D. Vertical Datum Trees located and tagged by E.G. Rud & Sons inc. (763)- 786 -5556 on 11- 18 -04. Wetland located by E.G. Rud & Sons inc. (763)- 786 -5556 on 11- 30 -04. Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. (651)- 674 -6210 on 11- 23 -04. Topography Collected in Field by E.G. Rud & Sons between 06 -15 -04 to 12- 06 -04. Soil Borings located by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763)- 786 -5556 on 08- 30 -05. Soil Borings completed by Professional Engineering Consultants Inc. (651)490 -9266 on 08- 04 -05. See Grading Plan and Certificate of Survey for Hydrologic characteristics. This survey was prepared without the benefit of titlework. Easements, appurtenances, and encumbrances may exist in addition to those shown hereon. This survey is subject to revision upon receipt of a current title insurance commitment or attorney's title opinion. Prepared By= Cn� RU 4 SONS, N. SISC LEXINGTON AVENUE NE. CIRCLE PINES, tIM. EP OI.4 -3625 Tel. 1b3 -186 -6666 Fax 163- 18b -6001 •o • ExlHousfing se 4 Existing House g lei /i Coro Southerly..ffir line of Biich treeti , el y: ' o, e . R ilry • caw ,h`,c,.' ANDOAH essms,„d, ,n ,k.R E _ S8917'25"E �2�1e Mg 22 —.A, •892 -... Vet 8.4x6.6 Existin ed 195.00` ainoge and _L.'', Utlll Easement z N .i., r '' i' F r S+ e 0w 1.0 0 • a Existing n House • 94' % Eok . line of. ` Lot 1..Black \1, SHENANDOAH \. ^ L' 00 Exis House West lino of Lot 1. Block 1__ SHENANDOAH • • ); J ^ Etin House 12.3x8.3 Shamed Existm House GRAPHIC SCALE 20 w eo Boo +'." '".. ".':'"`- ::.::��a�, • Easement • �•• .•'•:ill±•'''' fit' ": EX1S INO•'''.'DITCH.. "' N ,ie ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. .98917'25"E South line of `__Lot 1, Block 1. SHENANDOAH _: • ?� is I. r z, `', ' `" •`Y • SE comer a� _Lot 1. Block 1, \ SHENANDOAH. fags within Creek it( • ▪ EIVED SEP 1 1 2006 1 CITY OF LINO LAKS Nu„N N,; NAA w.z• 12 -20-05 arnrm ON JAR awewic NO, RESOURCE XS ,NS, 04350PP smsEr 1 cr 1 VICINITY MAP: PARTS OF SEC. 29, TWP. 3L RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, tvINsESOTA NOT TO SCALD TREE DETAL: �- Denotes Elevation ' b° ti ' 9":-- Denotes Tree Size in Inches o . Denotes Tree Quantity Denotes Tree Type TREE TYPES: e MAPLE • CEDAR POPLAR *RED PINE GUN BENCHMARK: TNH on Sioux Lane at the front of Lots 28 and 29, Block 1, Spirit Hi /Is Development. Elevation = 898.80 (N. G V.D. 1929) CERTIFICATION: hereby certify that this survey, plan r report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1 HN A. RENGO Date! le 2o30/O.0 License No. 25344 D n ek6v" ii'�.'I LTRA n_.e:..Nu:L'2'`A ' .R�'. .. " «"`r' ..5°'u er <.... .z... .. .. iau ��i'> ?r, ett- FRAYS ESTATE PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL & UTILITY PLAN City of-Lino Lakes, Minnesota ADDITIONAL NOTES FOR PONDING /INFILTRATION BASIN: I) FINAL GRADE INFILTRATION AREAS FOLLOWING STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. 2) USE MNDOT SEED MIX 269 AND /OR 309 -9479 FOR INFILTRATION AREAS. 3) INSTALL SILT OR CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND PROPOSED INFIL1RATION AREAS AFTER ROUGH CRAVE. 4) NO MINING OF SANDY SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS. 5) USA A SAND /TOPSOIL MIXTURE FOR TOP DRESSING INSTEAD OF TOPSOIL IN 040111RARON AREAS RECEIVED SEP 1 1 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES kFnt4S,ea9 3169 ,W {tti i&x°x C1wP CONNECT TO EX 16" DIP WM 'f W/ 1" COPPER (TYP) ,r �� >6 EX 18" DIP W- TERMAI 65 63 ^.09 EX MIL 9 -4 RE 896.00 I,E /Qc\ SW 878.67 _ 97`9 iagi t P6:3r.L:w'2;3L cn�65j.W e _ 9 Y A � '�OE�Ot poet y �_ 09797 BPn° 969 ap 5194�°D^ it ''/ ''°°yye�l .�____R_y:elcE \ \ / 4832, \ \ 36",/x 30" Reducer I / / 1 iJ \ Vag' / / I Im3� 1 / 1 I Ar l I I Proposed 80 /LF. of i ! 36" CMP a1 0.25% III I I. I_ 1 ru• R8 STOP Tyr- xsa - - Ira(nage and SAT' ty Easement -- - - -- GAR 900.00 LOWEST FLOOR 892.601 1 WO 892.60 1 \ __a 023 orv0 een's INFILTRATION AREA 120 S.L t. �s o u1 0I 416- eg$' /6y }ID 9D71r OAR 899.70 L�7WEST FL�OR 892. 1 II WO 892�F30 1 \ \" I B�lIYje \\ +er 2_j.4 898 896 .6o _ - 1 .694,SOIR 11 f1a6 / 1 Ot'OF7l19 \ 15 \ I / 1r �2 I / 59 1 " 1 5N I I It9xp 0 I I Proposed 36 " Aron I Invert,. 88 ) 010371 s AA 1 I I I ,f- 4, 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I T I I I I \ 1 1 I 14101 I I I I 1 1 1 EIEDpR ' t I [' A ! i e I I 11 61 10 R... 10 qI� 46 SCOOT 441 DF 1 y I _I on" pia" ■ rktek I b 1 110, 1 9 c i 1 W ' \ „� t - Edge of 949.94 'F \\ • Wetland \ v / {�v e \ ;\ +06x51\ \ 12 6 °� 6 T,°P6 6g D�}� ' \ \ 1nI*A -. \ +89'66 - {a9l`I /�S9 /b i +,pT.'6 1 I }4$t ar SLOPE \ - /` /x +457'" - - 140r4StyM / -1L \\ \4.D' . 9 y 't We�TSLO� \\ ei +t' 1 10,828 SQ. AFT. °"�� I LOT 2 AREA: \ \I {PLAND ,7; \ 1 11,484 SQ. FT. \ 9.66 \ I UPLAND • I i 1 I \ s, 4;9,1! 0 0 0 0) 2 U 1-- O 0 z 1- 20 V) x 967.,5 894 -�a / \ - - -/ . �eW s6 ' \ ■ ape \ e6A1 + 39 696. 1 II \ , I I I I 02� port 365 PO -▪ LOT 1 AREA: Est %4°x.4135 SQ. FT. 1 I 1 n \ r! 1\ y .4910. 1 - + \ v I- I / 1J ` 1 p1 . ate. I Vito" 1 6e 6''6019171 Wool 66 'N' 40 20 .E -+4r� §jpet ,59 N 10 \ l � \ I'I Iu 1 \ 1 \ I I \ • ..606e \ I +L6 66 \ \I LOT 2 AREA: 36,658 SQ. FT. 4o'' "�ppe LOT 1� AR\ A: "" no8 4 0 9 3! s Q6: \ \\ FT. 1 .93 1 ACRE \I$ ic%.Lp n9t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D4 1 {°c°'L I.- ♦ 11440, sort I 1 SL09E • i \ ts� %F'PE 11 y e6L�02r nevi \ �t6oF sLOVE I �B,r stnv6 A °F 4( "°' • epq91 SLME 0 {10 OF IN, 001.50 ej6 prtR I r N 7161 7' .ep�66,A,ER ina.e Easemen ,.GET 6017 14" w- 7.42 FN01i0d eA 96/7 +ertarroco 41 DESIGNED Br 1V. DRAWN Br. 4.0. CHECKED Br C.W.P. PROJECT N0. 0489B T5 - 10001 titEwn_ - •-- .-- •-- •- I- .-- \- -. - -.- J 5/10/06 7/31/07 7666. Pad .6..009 mod comments 9/16/03 MW.e CWMI6 OA REVISION r ; ' \\YY 1 Y , 9.39r0R • EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONT70L MUTES d MPI.MmSA1951 S(HFSUlf 1) 011011 ,0 SIL7 TOP 711. 975797. SIT 511E FEARS IN LOCAL OLDS 190791 *57951141 561 599 791193 WILL 6E 360117[° 94553 LOCAL MNITIWS 390117E (t) PIONDE NARY[ TOPSOIL. 5EM, AND MULCH ANCHORED "ITN A SRIAIe 7 SET DISC 1611011 14 DAYS OF FINAL a1MIN0. 03) PHNOM ONO. AND 576-95 ATESION FENCES S (INCLUDE TIE REMOVAL 06 ACCUMULATED w N/..r, =frt.- 9.. rw... A•7 -l..aR 05.5 1 M f Ls K4466 twa, FW4 vdwgF r..A 1 994 ^ • IeA • *^0 1.0..01 .Mwa9. Md. 39. "J,1A 4 M ww6■ SILT PENCE 6' DRAIN 111E IF REQUIRED FOR DRAl77GE SEE NO71 A OMNI TYPICAL SECTION INIhLTRARON AREA NOTE A SUBCUT INFILTRATION AREA 18 INCHES AND BACKFILL TO FINISHED GRADE WITH PLANTING MEDI )M. PLANTING MEDIUM SHALL CONSIST OF A WELL- BLENDED MIXTURE OF 405 SEMI - COURSE WASHED SAND OR NATIVE SAND, 309. MNDt1T GRADE 2 COMPOST AND 3056 NATIVE TOPSOIL BY VOLUME. USE MNDOT SEED MIX 28B AND /OR 308 -WF FOR INFILTRATION AREA. I hereby eert /fy that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supendslon and that 1 Dm o duly Ucensed Professional Engine under the laws of the State of Mlnneso6,. C LES1. POW. DATE: 9/76/07 LICENSE IJ 18227 1) ME INFORMATION SHOWN ON 11015E DRNMNM CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EASTINO VELLUM NOT 91AAANIETD 1D BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE TIE CONIRA0 IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 1040910 979 OWIN D E1ENM1NATDN AS TO 1115 TYPE AND LOCATION OF UIIIITFS As MAY BE NECFASARY 1D AVOID DAMAOF THESE 101970.5. 2) CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE AT ES9-454 -0002 FOR E10S1C0 UTU1Y LOCATIONS. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD 9456 Y ME. LOCATION, AND ELEVATOR OF DIMIN0 SANITARY 096601, WA MAIN, 97,0 STORM SEINER AND NOTIFY EN961E37 Of ANY rescsoIWOM PRIOR TO THE START or INSTALLATIONS 11 4) INSTALLATIONS 01ALL C07914 I0 110 01Y ENCIN ERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (LFAM) STANDARD 011099 SPECIFICATIONS (1919 55111071) AND 7115 CITY OF UNO LANES STAH0II10 SPECIFICATIONS 5) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 7TY'OF 0N0 LOSS 76)505 9099 9FPAR0MENT AT (051) 652 -2430 A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRICE TO NIT INTERRUP0ON OF SANITARYSEIVOT OR WATER SERVICE TO EIOS11140 HOMES OR BUSINESSES 1) SAFE -COT EMS 540 SINNMC)S AND CONCRETE CURB TO PROVIDE B UTT- J01NT. 2) REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL Cr COSM9 STREET 97910095 AS RE01IRm FOR CONSTRUCTION IS INCIDENTAL 5) 0 ISTURBEED EET TO 5576190 OR BETTER MORON AS 4) (ON1RACTO1 SHALL USE 1RNF1C CONTROL MEASURES 974 ACCORDANCE WITH THE - MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM 704019 006411c9 DENIES) AS NECESSARY WNENEVDe GRAOINO, WERE OR PAVING UPERAlIM5 ENCROACH ONTO ADJACENT STREETS. 1) STORM SEWER SHALL BE RCP (CRASS IT MINIMUM) OR HOPE UNLESS 0T11ERMSE NOTED ON PLANS 2) STORM SERER LE/10114S INCLUDE THE LATINO LENOTH OF THE APRON. 1) MAMTAN MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER OVER WATER 9ER39CE 2) WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 7' CU TYPE R MIES9 OTHERWISE 501133. 3) FIELD VERIFY SITE MO LOCATION OF DOMINO WAIER6UIN AN0 NDerr 9610NE0R OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PWOR TO THE START Of CONSTRUCTION. 1) 061111NO SANITARY SUMMER LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED 94 ?RID PRIOR 10 CONSTRUCTION, 2) SANITARY SEWER 99R310E 70 801LDM0 SHALL BE 4' PVC MEDIAE 40 UNLESS 011119191SE 007ED. 3) rap MEET LOCATION, 977 AND INVERT ELEVATION OF POSTING SANITARY SEWER AND NOTIFY ENONEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO 1HE S1NET OF CONSTRUCTOR. SCALE 1 Inch - 20 IL LEGEND: Existing Watermaln Existing Sanitary Sewer Existing Storm Sewer Proposed Watermoin Proposed Sanitary Sewer Proposed Storm Sewer -6- Existing Hydrant Proposed Hydrant IID - B - x780.89 Existing Sanitary Manhole Proposed Sonitary Manhole Proposed Catch Basin /Manhole Direction of Surface Drainage Proposed Contour Existing Contour Existing Gas Line Existing Overhead Wires Silt Fence Proposed Spot Elevation (Note: Proposed spot elevations shown ere ground surface, bituminous surface, utter line unless otherwise noted.) Existing Spot Elevation TDlOWPl Go PLIIIIITE QLOQ(E6M'10 PM IAN, DM V0 NB. BUn9 NO 1D101ARBS. MN 7-101 MONK: 715 IC. PAX. 7.0) 75. 0 07 PREPARED FOR. FAN TO(MVILLE 7948 LAKE DRIVE Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tone (BSI) 713 -7964 DAM 2/27/6 SHEET c1 PIMNAS PL4t OOF: FRAN'S ESTATE FOR: FRAN TOURVILLE 6948 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PH# (651) -786 -1884 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, SHENANDOAH, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part lying within PARCEL 18 of ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 11. LEGEND: Denotes 1/2 inch by 18 inch /ran Pipe to • be Set and Marked by R.L.S. number 25344 • Denotes iron Found x1011.2 Denotes Existing Elevation • Denotes Direction of Drainage Denotes Soil Boring © Denotes Cab /e Box • Denotes Misc. Manhole ro., Denotes Power Pole Denotes Overhead Power /ine ® Denotes Sanitary Manhole CI Denotes O Denotes » —4 Denotes Denotes - — - Denotes Fiberop tic Fence Post Existing Contour 30 inch CMP Fence line Setback Line Denotes Wetland located by Earth Science Inc. - - - - --- Denotes Edge of Wetland by Earth Science /nc. Denotes Existing Bituminous Rood, Access, and 99691 961i° 69119 2, ♦3 Proposed Eon EtP ,V �1i _Bituminous Egli La N.. 5981.°11 %69715' i, Curb . ..9761' 'EM g91,'A AREAS: Total Boundary Area = 82,143± (1.891 Acres) Excluding R/W Total Upland = 20,362± (0.48± Acres) Total Wetland = 61,781± (1.42± Acres) Total Right of Way = 1,950± (0.04± Acres) ZONING: - Property is Zoned R -1 — No Rezoning Proposed GUIDING - Property guiding Low Density Single Family. PI,C5 05.0 ...,1, "If fag °, E!p 99 47 , e5' 9 7667 69�' _ 1 '.,,896.54 � 89695 LB1S•_��p i9■t 697.6 iw, • 00. p9S95 991i/9 .9111 L .g EH eg69` %DDlr)1 CAP 495 4, ie91 697 6 %W s9s5i3,lo• oa` ' 991e, Ems 81 {4 15'9652 7, ,eP 697.63- ,996' 696.92 E91, g97� + 697 pM:19 r.e AO 5.9 e4566 Oa to o^„t. • - - -•._. -.�^ m. Southerly R/W Idle 1., of Birdr'Stree , -! 9e6 North Jlne • of r . I _Lot- 1, 'Block l - SHENANDOAH -' 403? '�8... 89 &09 „605.5 PCP p.P POPtpl.- CUP EXST MUSH - Property falls within the MUSA. — No MUSA amendment proposed St= I HACKS: - Front = 40 ft. - Proposed Front = 25 ft. - Side = 10 ft. - Rear = 30 ft. - Wetland = 10 ft. Troll - Average Front = 20.6 ft. - House to East = 13.1 ft. to old R/W line - House to West = 28.1 ft. 20 Fool. o, Vag' r Drainage ond—�� µ9et•°P / //./ UtAitp EaSeflent89, Existing s 9➢ i a House ZONE . Proposed 80 L.F. of _ VE R -1 36• CMP of 0.255-i µ914:8.6 i ';.1 i • Existing- -_7.--......, ,.� :Shd JK' Proposed Mvtrt__..., * 884 75 °.i° a 6 OP W 696+ / µ3EJ' "SE 6 7 oro ge �C / /- --'G"s FENCE CORAERC ^y LIES 0.1 FT EAST 18-110n340,.. P i DI Apar- t rsP 5 1 _ ' !' t• o*•r 0. n X13 U W° i t :, j -.. 1g .YFfSU1'Fr.__ ■ z:._25 Ft.:Front, 11dVD ,�� ,, Proomnd , zaePy-t O Ft. Sid.---. id' - da +� BAO .' 69Td9l, ,,.„..\,„,,,,q . .wad "b"Lb ;t0 FL:. Welland. , I 1_10 Fl Slae - -�•-- �: Sr' •. I Setback e97.46 °P[r a�5d ,,Lr'f _641, 529.: 'dy9 �..slpPG_ 5nunn, cxclP' y6PE,°P '. iO as o0 0 . _A956 EXST. r Setboek y. 5 e -4,0K AREA tft °w 9-de'! '- 90,534± SO. r uQUwD Existing House �Z {./ K Setba6k aP : -IQD • • r5etbock_..._----- .1896 -..` bays` ;110,6-4890g4/"."/"' 10. t- Wort nV.- ,, 1 � a`°` s�Pf .' e9a0, tope `..:.•.89 ...�... L ,7/Sp 6�'92i qq��ar t�8, • ....r.:...t....... n.. 892- �� .'" 6 'es 7 • ,IY;f •. 1.`'t9E ' `:� :a°Pf' '. � �.6PE %Se, co. Ed e.ar Wetlona' .w .Ps. Pellneeted. -. • - Earth- Science -Inc.- ... DEVELOPMENT DATA: - 2 Proposed Single Family Lots - Single Family Lots = 82,1431 SQ. FT. (1.89± ACRES) - Average Lot Size = 41,071.51 SQ. FT. (0.941 ACRES) G - Density = 1.06 Lots / Acre NOTES: - Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of wetland is 885.1 per Emmons and Olivier Resources, contact Greg Graske (651)- 770 - 8448.. - Curb shots taken at the top and back of curb. - Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. - Contours are at 2 foot intervals. - N.G.V.D. Vertical Datum - Wetland located by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763)- 786 -5556 on 11- 30 -04. - Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. (651)- 674 -6210 on 11- 23 -04. - Topography Collected in Field by E.G. Rud & Sons between 06 -15 -04 to 12- 06 -04. - Soil Borings located by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763)- 786 -5556 on 08- 30 -05. - Soil Borings completed by Professional Engineering Consultants inc. (651)490 -9266 on 08- 04 -05. - Existing centerline street grades, building pads, proposed contours, and curb information refer to Pre - Grading - Utility plans prepared by Poowe Engineering (763)- 785 -1043. - This survey was prepared without the benefit of titiework. Easements, appurtenances, and encumbrances may exist in addition to those shown hereon. This survey is subject to revision upon receipt of o current title insurance commitment or attorney's title opinion. EST 1811 E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. Professional Land Surveyors www.egud.corn 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 -8200 Fax (651) 361 -8701 NORTH Existing • House /,r .2 . pI r1 ; // 44 Weat line `:of gf Lot 1. Bloek 1._ 49 SHENANDOAH E, ECM0 -C' / Elea wee Existing .. oEd' ' House ,,''o4 Via,: cr 0;1.65: • W ee7 �¢t f.-toi.: REA:.•.•.. -:`-- 06,6 • lea.'.'.''�'.-r 45.335 *.• SQ.: Fi:... . of •.;.„ . VORNeR h .• '.'. EAST. OF -LOT ' EXST. Ate Exist1.,., eea.es. °+ •'d -- -- f, 104V" 339,E Shetld I'EAV ST OF LOT ONFt,y+ e 695.6 7T M9E tO «-t 496 • ..TOTAL. AREA:......,. 35,80Bt,S0. FT. r.'..'.. ,.... ,.... r6 rainoge "or d- Utillty- .— =Eoserrmeril ndec�a4�.� - -ci . ..,, 0,. �'.L Alegi' t o . sl.°T -.'. ZONE R_1 '1 i r rt \ Eaa. Ilse of. ' -_Lot 1 }. SHENANDOAH\ W No NY, cz p0 • • r•* EXST. ZONE '4 -1 i-Fenae 6�63P19 x- x ; Z' 6e&51P0' µr1 r r . n� ,- 1 Existing./ House/`.,,! ZONE r %I� ¶ 1P50 �e 't P solaro9, ' <, :re do .....081l ,mo N ' P cart ' 4• Eks T ZONE ab9i,�95e1E SE comer 'PI, Lot 1. Blo Ock 1, P" S AH. fope, s within Cre ... ' ...4..„4....... .'... .•.'r.'.'.. -.'.'.'.'...' so6F. ...... .. . .. - ...85.00-30.0 195.00 * 1 38917'29"E t'1 it. 1 6?6AM,.A 11 south line of E �B�. Sk�d9„" -yyPL -_Lot 1, Block 1. • ''ff'}„6s. ,-,,Ii. SHENANDOAH �- as 75 S, 'oPE - I.' 'CP Or _: 7 SLOPE m .r . -' w �,de• ;' ea7.nr KdP�• R_ 1o7eesF °� l frrF• L 4°44674 °r 5L PE 8655.40 587 7e6 er GRAPHIC SCALE A .0 6D 6ei:aa TOP OF 9L°Pr ; • • 1161'i , P5 a, 6� SL°P[ eB, 535 gCPf aa's18c' j/ �,- •�°Pag7.e9 xRE. fp�tJ ,(R Or SLOP 'l9 ( IN FELT ) 1 inch >: 40 11 . EXST. ZONE R-1 & PARK PRESERVE E f, '0 m .s C ectE6 R -1 • t 9fB0o.3`���OO?..a, '05 �'9m , AO -4V EEO fpl r* VICINITY MAP: PARTS OF SEC. 29, TWP. 3L RNG. 22 *Existing r^, House �02 ;EELPa• Pi I ]6 0:4:9-9E ANOKA COUNTY. MINNESOTA NOT TO SCALD TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTILITY EASEMENTS: 5 i J 0 Sj L 0 Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise and adjoining inin side lot lines indicated, �o g , and 10 feet in width and adjoining street lines as shown on the plot. Drainage and Utility easement to be dedicated over all wetland area. r SEP 11 2006 Ci i Y OF ! ,i `:C LAKES arm. ee NAA o,,7. 12 -20 -05 arcats BP. JAR ARA6WC Na... PRE -PLA r JOB Na: 04350PP srar 1 or 1 BENCHMARK: TNH on Sioux Lane at the front of Lots 28 and 29, Block 1, Spirit Hills Development. .. V. Elevation 896.60 (N .G. D . 1929) CERTIFICATION: hereby certify that this survey, pion .r report was prepared by me or under y direct supervision and that i am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. . A. in-IN R N Date: l? /.20/05 License No. 25344 CTIICAT- OP SURVEY •OF: FRAN'S ESTATE • • FOR FRAN TOURVILLE 6948 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES MN PH# (651)- 786 -1884 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, SHENANDOAH, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part Tying within PARCEL 18 of ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 11. LEGEND: o Denotes 1/2 inch by 18 inch Iran Pipe to be Set and Marked by R.L.S. number 25344 • Denotes Iron Found x1011.2 Denotes Existing Elevation Denotes Direction of Drainage ▪ Denotes Soil Boring ® Denotes Coble Box Denotes Misc. Manhole 'o. Denotes Power Pole Denotes Overheod Powerfine ® Denotes Sanitary Manhole ❑o Denotes Fiberoptic ® Denotes Fence Post Denotes Existing Contour Denotes 30 inch CMP Denotes Fence line Denotes Wet land located by Earth Science Inc. Denotes Edge of Wetland by Earth Science Inc. Denotes 100 Year Flood Area from FEMA Maps Denotes 100 Year Flood Boundary from FEMA M Denotes Existing Bituminous Rood, Access, and »----4 ■- WO SA 6a btu rese 096 6p7SN \ °96 e97D3I / 107„ .37 E6� - it- °��Eql ��y1 � F9 _.�.., tt 1013" 14139 • e9r Er: ffi seo fQ� b9 ss0.`" e9, es.9x EEO e; ' 0 n e9� y,O C'4' eel Me .5y P, rye 891 900, Pt. 196.75 so7•''S 9�1 � 9p4:15 Ef0 00' °otm 10 SHENA gs 1 aAT ZONING: — Property is Zoned R -1 GUIDING: Property guiding Low Density Single Family. MUSA' — Property falls within the MUSA. aps. Troll NOTES: — Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of wetland is 885.1 per Emmons and Olivier Resources, contact Greg Graske (651) -770- 8448.. — Curb shots taken at the top and back of curb. — Contours are at 2 foot intervals. — N.G.V.D. Vertical Datum — Wetland located by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763) -786 -5556 on 11- 30 -04. — Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. (651)- 674 -6210 on 11- 23 -04. — Topography Collected in Field by E.G. Rud & Sons between 06 -15 -04 to 12- 06 -04. — Soil Borings located by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. (763)- 786 -5556 on 08- 30 -05. — Soil Borings completed by Professional Engineering Consultants Inc. (651)490 -9266 on 08- 04 -05. — Boundary area not shaded is the approximate location of Flood Zone C (area of minimal flooding) as determined by F.I.R.M. Map Panel 270015 0010 B dated May 17, 1982. — Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. — This survey was prepared without the benefit of titlework. Easements, appurtenances, and encumbrances may exist in addition to those shown hereon. This survey is subject to revision upon receipt of a current title insurance commitment or attorney's title opinion. Prepared By: 0 IQUID 4 SONS, NO. Cn Surveyor' SISO LEXINGTON AVENUE NE. CIRCLE PINES, MN. 5501.4 -3625 Tel. 163 - 186 -6556 Fax 163-136-6001 Iww.egrud.com NORTH NSE 9i ...._..896• E`er .. ' ec• Southerly R/W One_ ,°, of Birch/Street d �c�EOp70n q.. // Existing House a • ff Proposed 80 L5. ni _li, 36' t io of ID= 11 ir 8.4x8.6 — rag __Plsting —,•`- Shed 1911' erM Proposed Invert__ / - 88415 IIp�r.._.e Xs y.e' . t- _ $89 • • OAH i —ice d •ry'zs' � �rss o "�.. • s s_ ;max —_ °'Yt se -e ON107 O91 \` i Drelnoge and yt 'II ovoUtlllty Easement• ft: 1p d S:1� e�•st:. a TS er soPs. vii'.E°�m*•:`SW7.1Kr ..asc:E: STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V.F Paul Bengtson October 11, 2006 Amendment to the Planned Unit Development - Final Plan Lakewood Apartments On October 24, 2005 the City Council approved Resolution 05 -161 (attached) which approved the PUD Final Plan for the Lakewood Apartments. Lakewood Apartments is a mixed use building consisting of first floor commercial with apartments also on a portion of the first floor, and the floors above. •Iartford Group Inc. has requested to make some changes to the Lakewood Apartments project to address some issues that have come up while creating construction documents for the project. They are proposing the following changes: • Alter the elevations by removing the balconies and `balconettes' in favor of slider windows. • Eliminate the 2 inch `reveal' trim required surrounding all windows. • Add a third color to the palette • A revised central element to address the condition of approval requiring such. They have submitted revised elevations, revised renderings of the elevation, and some documentation on the proposed removal of the 2 inch reveals for windows on the project. ANALYSIS Balconies: While staff is disappointed to lose the balcony elements which we had hoped would create visual interest and some opportunity to further portray activity. We recognize that these opportunities are probably equaled if not outweighed by the potential for negative impacts on the visual appearance of the building. The balconies would allow residents of the apartment building to store or display materials on the balconies that might detract from the overall aesthetic appearance being created within the Legacy at Woods Edge project area. Balconies are not required by the design standards so the removal of them could be approved without any need to revise the standards. • Lakewood Apartments, page 2 Oeveals/Recesses: The removal of the 2 inch reveals surrounding the windows has raised a greater concern about the unwillingness of contractors to warranty some of the elements involved in that type of construction and the possibility that it can not be accomplished when the hardi -board siding product is used. The current requirements of the standards are as follows: (There are two different citations -one for commercial and one for residential) Reveals. Windows and doors must be recessed at least two inches from walls or exterior trim to create shadow for visual interest. Recesses. Windows and doors must be recessed at least two inches from walls or exterior trim to create shadow for visual interest. Any decision to allow Hartford to not meet this requirement will more than likely trigger the need to revise this section of the design standards for the Legacy project. Color Palette: The third color being added to the palette does help to further accentuate the `bay' approach which is intended to create the look of multiple buildings built with zero lot lines. Staff supports the use of this third color. Central Element: The central element of the building has been differentiated from the other elements of the building and therefore staff feels this proposal meets the intent of the condition of approval recommended by staff and approved by the City Council. • ACTION Staff needs a recommendation from the board to forward to the City Council. Additionally, direction on whether the board would support amending the development standards is needed. Any amendment to the development standards will require a public hearing and will therefore need to follow on an upcoming agenda if that is the direction given by the board. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 05 -161 2. Lakewoods Apartments Elevations, submitted October 5, 2006 3. Lakewoods Apartments Rendering, submitted October 5, 2006 • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 05 -161 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN FOR THE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a planned unit development — final plan approval for property currently described to -wit: Outlot A, THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota. ;and WHEREAS, the City has approved a final plat entitled THE VILLAGE NO. 4, which will create the parcel on which the Lakewood Apartments is proposed to be constructed. This parcel will be described as: Lot 1, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 4 ; and WHEREAS, the planned unit development — final plan approval request is based on the following submittals: 1. Lakewood Apartments Plan Set received September 27, 2005. 2. Village No. 4 Final Plat received September 7, 2005 ; and WHEREAS, at their meeting on October 12, 2005, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the planned unit development — final plan subject to the conditions listed in the meeting minutes; and WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide subject to certain conditions of approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the planned unit development — final plan for the Lakewood Apartments subject to the following conditions: 1. A site performance agreement between the city and the developer must be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review memo must be addressed to the • satisfaction of city staff. 3. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities, must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits. • Speiser Acres Page 2 4. All parking lot lighting fixtures and poles shall be painted to complement the city's decorative street lighting; shall be mounted to round lighting poles measuring no more than twenty feet in height; shall be mounted to a concrete base no higher than twenty -four inches above the surrounding grade; and shall be located within landscape planter islands. 5. A revised lighting plan indicating the above required fixture changes, and the relocation of the luminaire near the north entrance drive further east to avoid a conflict with the garage opening must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits for the site. 6. The final plat for the project (Village No. 4) must be approved prior to City Council approval of this building. 7. The developer must work with staff to identify the most appropriate location for bicycle parking within this block of the development. 8. A full recycling plan must be submitted for staff review prior to this item being heard by the City Council. • 9. A minimum 2 inch deep window trim must be provided in accordance with the development standards for the site. 10. The developer is required to add an additional architectural element to the central portion of the building to further strengthen the presence of the corner. 11. All units within the residential portion of the building are required to be supplied with uniform internal window treatments that will complement the architecture of the building. 12. The landscape plan shall be revised to indicate four shrubs per tree within the north planter island (adjacent to the Interstate 35W right -of -way). 13. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of October 2005. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk 111•11111111111111111111111111111=1" LINO LAKES 1 ilia i isiiiia iIi I i *; Wi II Mtr 111111 11 NI MI MI t ' 111 DI El r1Ii1 N MIn i 1 ii1 mF L111111 11 111 iiit Sl 1 II Ill p Tien 11 il 1111 1 4119 siT:tJox maw we mat sc.. as =slam= . .............................■....7.1111:11: r:....1:161= IRIX5crockwourr—sig--iri...s. ..--« ,%■-t --__:...--,.....' . imam n'.3 rff_ rm.: =le Ira Isms= -.M. wr.anewatesimmormap■ - ,:12116. Wit lati".311111.610. .. '...•.'"' SI cArril gE listoslinwmow OM Seam modem momsla...5,-- i-.',,,_,70. !WM MO= RIME* WM MIMI NOM NIM1......,,,,,ter INIKOCC11115..116milsemillaiimbeIMOOte...._::ri Ma =I MEE. Nos esaw a- V161611110/VA . , 1 1 .."176 104111-1-01rWoo ..•-•=1.53 - liar...ma ma Ow am =oz., [111111111111111.11::: • 111111111•101111•1111111111V 1110. ENA OE SW1 81€B ''---7-7- .....,,,, . .....,... ... ........-st. 011111111111111 '1Z...... _ ...111716111111111111111111,' li 1•11 a 1N1111611 1N1MM N11M ARX I R * AII N IWMII ISS C II SIMCN G NNfr M M ill . Xi ... 11111.22 .1, ,,,..— - ........ . •.,..,.,.....3M IRO . , ••, ,,,................"."--'-*."'".. _ .J-ip111•INSIIIIMIllit: `Milling. -:-.41r9111101)111181111111t, • 17,1,1W.-77,1.-1,15,1.4MMME111 Mqr, MEM=°,:1211■ -2131W Att • t t 1:1161MICIIICSSILWO MU= 811:1 um= sas no WE 4111119110111.=1:5•=ra7t....../.6•• rt't ,r1 1r, , -r==t, COM 1111BEIC=IIE1121112114121111=1== asa Ma ma Mall= fEr-- SMIIIIIIRR.41 --1:-',1111C11111IMINMEIMIG ,151110111111 Irak - -11111111f1 rarLIZ= LI-Lt. a r`er2 Wil8 Eri 1,VMP414.581 M111,12 =IP • ," ,TIF 1 ■1■ 111 111 Emig _ _ o p:•••• 1 KAI 1161111.1" • I■■ ■■ *Los ■■I■■ ■■ ■■ ■■�■■ M• 11111M n • I■ ■T ■D 11 I■• ■■ ■11 •M• • EllW022111111111-...:CNEEMm 0 _11 9 9 111.111 1 1III. 1....11 1111111 1111111 1111111 1111.11 11 111 II 1111111 11 1 11 11 11111 n - :Cifilimme■r em■11•101MI■Eram== =MMES �!I\ ■►\ I%� 1101, „ % -n'U pin 1 Q 911 1/11[3 1pf Si• Ma= x1110 0i SOUTH ELEVATION 5. 9Q 911 1/41.1 Mt Siuie 11P••••• se Siff I/1L1 R Naas 01111e•---I 9EE M1 Imu rot I* » U111R 1 111111 ■ 11111 ■ 1.111 ■ 11.11 1111111 11 11 11111 11.11 111111 11111111 .1 1111111 11 .11 11 1111111 1111.11 II11111 111.111 11 1 IR 11111■ 1 1111111 III 11iii MIl 1111E • 9a 911 ,/1112111 E.Ram NW= 2�SOUTH —EAST ELEVATION 5. 11 __ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■. ■ •••• 11 11 NIL Vr•rd 90.E 1/r•rd 11 �EQ 911 1/115 IR 91• lam= Emma 1-# 911 1 2111 Damao aurce -1 EAST —SOUTH —EAST ELEVATION 5. 9¢ Siff I/K1 /Q sa 11URR11 EIa1Ll •• �� ■1111 • SEE W 1/4.1 FOR S1. 011/1® 0510011 NIL• I/r_rd ARCHITECT /ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD -- .— �. , -1•• - RrMIle <YMWalla 1.11 ase CONSULTANT: OWNER: LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP 1300 F.1•301aL, 7909.10aAVIEXUE SOWN PROJECT: HUD PROJECT NUMBER: UREA -0502D LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: 1/1•/ID15- CAI. SUMO. ;m /m111' 13- REV PEE C D111/SOCS- 13 SR 1 1y1/1D05- SD SET 1 5/1/2•11 - PEWIT =X REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A5.1 1 1 1..11'..1•• 1 .. FE . . L .I !. ,1..__._ 1 ._. .. .. — °— _ —� — — - - - - - -- == -- - - - - -I . . L¢-1/IaSD9<BA®W*111 1 NORTH -EAST ELEVATION 5. MIL I r -r-r 1= .. .. $ D 1/i} IR SIL CRA® SWAM WEST ELEVATION 5. 11 11 ..I'I..; 11.11 ■■ ■■ .. ■■ ..' 11 ®11 11'II11 z 9r 1/AIS MR 9L DUIIAD 1191 1 I WEST -NORTH -WEST ELEVATION 5. 1 -1 -1 _- ..I.. .. .. ..1 .. ■■ ■■ ■ ■I.■ ■. ■ ■ SIS 91 tp 11R DU.IIO 09.18 SOIL 1/r•rw ■ ■ �m ■ ■■ . . . SD 91 IIRLS 1De 9< WILD 11!9101 ■ ■ =- ::.MI =I ..,. saL v�r -r-r ..�.. ,11' •• •• _L f .i ....., .a M........7. ■■ .. .,i..i,. SIGNAGEIMM "��'M 5Fa E, �lI >Q W TAIS 1R 9< WILD ODIUM 4 NORTH ELEVATION 5. SEE 90 1 /.1. R WAD ELMO. SO: 9L 1/I[S D St WILD OLIILR �� 911: t/r -r-r ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PLANNER HARTFORD R A —m-9.I m:n.14 14 ▪ h.. -s h — el4 W 6I Les! Olk 11.11 Rem 11*Iefen! IV CONSULTANT: OWNER: LLAH LTD PARTNERSHIP PROJECT: HOD PROJECT X11111: 9HFA-05020 LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ISSUE: A /15 /2005- CRY !9110, S/21/2005- IRV PER 1015 10 /14 /mm- 00 BET 1 11/1/905- sl m 5 5/0/901 - PEWIT ®I L. REV. THIS SHEET 0 NO REV. THIS SHEET SHEET TITLE: ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A5.2 © mww«rmis. reilwi, WIMPA , rc.®ala1sm91emam woa