Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/11/2013 P&Z Packet• CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING • Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 14, 2013 4. OPEN MIKE 5. ACTION ITEMS A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING to consider a rezone of property located at 7880 Sunset Avenue (PID #07- 31 -22 -23 -0004) from R -Rural to PUD- Planned Unit Development and an Amendment to the Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat of Century Farm North to expand project boundary and include certain property located at 7880 Sunset Avenue. 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Legacy at Woods Edge — Master Plan Concepts B. Project Updates 7. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4- minute limit. • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice - Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT . MEMBERS ABSENT . STAFF PRESENT August 14, 2013 6:30 P.M. 7:18 P.M. Neil Evenson, Michael Hyden (Vice Chair), Perry Laden, Robert Nelson, Paul Tralle (Chair) Lou Masonick, Michael Root Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on August 14, 2013. 2. APROVAL OF AGENDA The Agend approved gs presented. Mr. Laden stated that he will not be voting on the Emmerich co °''t pl ,gam 3. APPROVAL OF MINITES: July 10, 2013 Mr. Hyden made a MOTION approve the July 10, 2013 Meeting Minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 4 - 0. (Laden abstained.) 4. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:30 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:31 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 4 - 0. (Tralle abstained.) DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board August 14, 2013 Page 2 5. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING to consider a rezone of property located at 7880 Sunset Avenue (PID #07- 31 -22 -23 -0004) from R -Rural to PUD- Planned Unit Development and an Amendment to the Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat of Century Farm North to expand project boundary and include certain property located at 7880 Sunset Avenue Katie Larsen, City Planner, recommended continuing the Public Hearing as staff is awaiting revised plans from the applicant. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION at 6:32 p.m. to continue the Pu meeting. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carri abstained.) Hearing to the next 0. (Tralle B. Consider a Variance to allow for a second driveway to be located at 2235 Arthur Court Katie Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. Staff answered questions of the bo Staff noted that the applicant reduced the recommendations. ea to be "k;= ed per the city engineer's Wayne Kelly, 2235 Arthur Court, Lino Lakes was present for questions. Mr. Nelson made a MOTION to recommend approval of a variance at 2235 Arthur Court to allow for a second driveway based on the findings as listed in the staff report and subject to the following conditions: comments from the City Engineer's Letter dated August 5, 2013 shall be ssed. 2. The accessory bui ding shall meet the general building and use provisions of Section 3, Sub 3. A building.;t shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the City prior to construction. 4. The driveway shall be paved with appropriate surface. 5. The survey submitted by E.G. Rud and Sons shall be revised to include: a. Existing impervious surface calculations. b. Proposed impervious surface calculations. c. Location and width of driveway. 6. The accessory building and driveway should be located to maximize tree preservation to the greatest extent possible. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board August 14, 2013 Page 3 Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 4 - 0. (Tralle abstained.) At this time, Chair Tralle adjusted the order of the agenda to discuss Item 6A while awaiting the arrival of the applicant for Item 5C. 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Project Updates Katie Larsen, City Planner provided an update of current city projects. 5. ACTION ITEMS C. Consider a residential concept plan for Emmerich Development Corp. Katie Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report Staff explained that this concept review is an opportunity for the applicant to receive feedback from the board prior to moving forward with the project. Mr. Laden removed himself from the discussion. The applicant proposes to have a neighborhood meeting in September to get comments from neighboring es with the intent to break ground next spring. The applicant, any Olson, was present for questions. Mr. Olson stated that there are areas of housing in The Lakes of Blaine similar to this type of proposed development. He added that the developers have been working with staff and have received a favorable reaction from neighboring property owners. Mr. Olson explained that their plans for development will be based n the market. He added that the result should be a cozier neighborhood. Board comments included: • The city needs affordable housing. • Favorable of the concept. • Would like to see more sidewalks. • Looking forward to a development similar to The Lakes of Blaine. • Prefer additional landscaping. 7. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Nelson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:18 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 4 - 0. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board August 14, 2013 Page 4 Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Katie Larsen, City Planner P & Z MEETING DATE: August 14, 2013 REQUEST: Continued Public Hearing, Century Farm North, Rezoning, Amendment to Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat Case No. PD2013 -001 APPLICANTS: Gary M. Uhde 3157 Berwick Knoll Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Jeff Morell 7880 Sunset Avenue Lino Lakes, MN 55014 OWNERS: Same REVIEW SCHEDULE: Complete Application Date: May 13, 2013 Environmental Board Meeting: May 29, 2013 EDAC Meeting: NA Park Board Meeting: June 12, 2013 Initial P & Z Board Meeting: June 12, 2013 City Council Meeting: TBD 60 -Day Review Date: July 12, 2013 60 -Day Extension: September 10, 2013 Additional 60-Day Extension November 11, 2013 BACKGROUND The applicant has submitted a land use application for the following: • Rezone property located at 7880 Sunset Avenue from R -Rural to PUD- Planned Unit Development. • Amendment to Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat of Century Farm North to expand project boundary, realign Robinson Drive and create new parcels. Page 1 Century Farm North P & Z Report 09/11/13 • Vacation of dedicated parkland (City Council action) The proposed Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat amendment (PUD amendment) occurs within Outlot A of Century Farm North 5th Addition. This will be the second PUD Amendment to Century Farm North. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat of Century Farm North to include a 0.991 acre parcel located 7880 Sunset Avenue owned by Jeff Morell. This parcel is currently zoned R -Rural and requires rezoning to Planned Unit Development in conjunction with Century Farm North. The project also includes the realignment of Robinson Drive. The current PUD/Preliminary Plat as it relates to Century Farm 5th Addition has 10 detached single family lots and 16 single family lots. The proposed rezoning, PUD amendment and road realignment will create an additional 12 single family lots and convert the 10 detached single family lots to single family lots. A portion of dedicated parkland will need to be vacated to accommodate 3 proposed new lots. The Park Board previously discussed the proposal and was supportive of the request. A formal vacation process including a public hearing will need to be held to formally vacate the park parcel. The hearing, held before the City Council, would likely be scheduled to coincide with Final Plat approval. ANALYSIS The applicant submitted an updated plan set on August 12, 2013. Based on staff review a number of items will need to be addressed before a recommendation of approval can be made. It is unclear from the information submitted whether the proposal is in conformance with city code requirements. The following comments should be addressed prior to board consideration of the request: 1. All comments from City Engineer letter dated September 3, 2013 shall be addressed. 2. A Wetland Delineation Report certified by a wetland specialist shall be submitted. The existing wetland should be accurately depicted on the applicable plan sheets. 3. The electronic submittals do not appear to match the hard copy submittals. All plan submittals should be consistent. 4. Revisions to Sheet 1 a. Areas and density calculations are not correct and shall be revised to include the entire Century Farm North preliminary plat. b. Values shall be calculated to the nearest hundredth not thousandth. 5. Revisions to Sheet la a. Park Vacation Parcel states 0.581 acres but Area on lower left hand corner states 0.551. Please revise. b. Values shall be calculated to the nearest hundredth not thousandth. 6. Revisions to Sheet 2 (Certificate of Survey) a. The lower left hand corner states 0.551 acres. Is this correct? Page 2 Century Farm North P & Z Report 09/11/13 • • • • • • b. The plan shows a 10 drainage and utility easement on the wetland within the park property. It is not clear is this is an existing or proposed easement. If proposed it should be removed from this plan sheet. c. There appear to be gaps in the wetland delineation. The delineated wetland extending from the north side of the road to the south does not match into the southern wetland. 7. Revisions to Sheet 3 a. Wetland delineation is shown over Robinson Drive right of way. If wetland has been previously mitigated, it should not be shown over the road. b. There appears to be gaps in the wetland delineation. The delineated wetland extending from the north side of the road to the south does not match into the southern wetland. c. Current wetland delineation shall be shown. d. The plan shows a 10 drainage and utility easement on the wetland within the park property. It is not clear is this is an existing or proposed easement. If proposed it should be removed from this plan sheet. 8. Revision to Sheet 4 a. Outlot A is not legible. b. Omit from the Typical Lot template the elevation numbers 901, 902, 903 for legibility. c. Omit from the Typical Lot template the black line that horizontally cuts through it. d. Omit from the Typical Lot template the drainage and utility easements. e. Show drainage and utility easement template separately on the sheet. f. A 10 foot wetland buffer is not maintained around the entire wetland boundary shown in Outlot A. g. The 10 foot wetland buffer shall be contained entirely within Outlot A and Outlot B. h. Outlot B does not appear to adequately contain the ponding area, The pond backslope cannot extend into the into the street. i. A drainage and utility easement encumbers Lot 11, Block 3 and makes it unbuildable. i. Verify with RCWD width requirements for drainage & utility easements over drainage ditches. Inclusion of this lot would require vacation and/or modification of this easement. j. The east property line of Outlot A shall be reduced in size to adequately accommodate wetland, buffer easement and trail. i. Sheet not legible. k. The future street access stubs shall be dedicated as right of way and fully constructed with Robinson Drive improvements. i. Stub shall be signed "Future Street Access ". 1. Block 6 shall show actual lot and block and street layout. m. An eight (8) foot wide trail shall be extended along the south side of Robinson Drive east of Lot 3, Block 5. i. Sheet not legible. Page 3 Century Farm North P & Z Report 09/11/13 n. A five (5) foot wide sidewalk shall be extended along the south side of Robinson Drive west of Lot 3, Block 5. i. Sheet not legible. o. The buildable area (gross area less wetland) for Lot 1, Block 5 should be shown on the plan. p. The proposed Sunset Avenue right -of -way, north of Robinson Drive, should be labeled accordingly. 9. Revisions to Sheet 4a a. The Future Street Access to the south appears to extend into a potential wetland area based on RCWD and MLCSS data. b. Future Street Access shall be relocated to the west to avoid potential wetland impacts. 10. Revisions to Sheet 6 a. The landscape plan shall meet the requirements of Section 3. Subdivision 4. Q. Please review. b. The landscape plan shall clearly show the location, type and count of all required trees and shrubs. c. Each tree and shrub shall have its own symbol. d. An actual count of each tree and shrub shall be provided. e. The landscape plan shall clearly show a 15 foot landscape buffer in accordance with Section 3. Subdivision 4. Q. along Lot 1, Block 3, Lot 1, Block 4 and the east side of the trail on Outlot A. i. Plans shall show double row planting for buffer. f. Elms trees are not an allowed species. 11. Revisions to Sheet 7 a. See City Engineer letter. b. City native seed mix specifications shall be provided for all ponds, swales, ditches and infiltration areas. c. Transitional mix shall be used when transitioning sod yard areas. 12. Revisions to Sheet 8 a. See City Engineer letter 13. The Lot Area Summary dated March 20, 2013 shall be revised to include a column for Gross Area, Unbuildable Area (i.e. wetlands) and Net Area. a. This shall be submitted in an Excel spreadsheet. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends continuing the public hearing and requests the applicant resubmit plans addressing all items listed in Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location 2. Aerial Map 3. City Engineer Letter dated 9 -3 -2013 Page 4 Century Farm North P & Z Report 09/11/13 • • • • • co N N Gentu rPy VrI4rijil)r n, 4s, a . C sn Ki I FA CtS c.) 0 gefit,at 17° it 272, 4—Jcp 0 0 144 0 CC oo z E LL z • WSBVB ,, engineering• planning• environmental. construction Memorandum To: Jason Wedel, PE, City Engineer From: Paul M. Hudalla, PE, Water Resources Engineer Date: September 3, 2013 Re: Century Farm North Preliminary Plat Stormwater Management Review WSB Project No. 2029 -49 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 -541 -4800 Fax: 763 - 541 -1700 I have received Century Farm North preliminary plat documents that were submitted to the City for review. The documents submitted lack the level of detail that is needed to conduct an adequate review and to verify if the plans can conform to the City's policies governing stormwater management. • The additional information that is needed to complete the review includes the following: • Preliminary Plat showing: • Easements covering stormwater management facilities, access to the facilities, and public utilities Grading Plan showing: • Datum • Building elevations • Floodplain cut / fill calculations (if applicable) • Emergency overflow locations and elevations • Grading limits Utility Plan showing: • Detail plates for public utilities • Utility crossing elevations • Casting types • Storm sewer calculations must be submitted to support the design St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com S: Advisory Boards & C:ommissions\Planning & Zoning Board \Packets\2013 Packets\$eptember 11, 2013Vtem 5A-CFN\Updated Report\4 Memo -JW - 090313.doc Mr. Jason Wedel September 3, 2013 Page 2 Erosion Control Plan showing: • Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) conforming to NPDES permit requirements • Silt fence • CB inlet protection • Rock construction entrance • Street sweeping • Restoration Stormwater Management Plan that includes: • Narrative explaining how water quality standards are achieved • Use of infiltration / volume control BMPs or justification why those BMPs are not effective or desired on the site • HydroCAD Report showing inputs and hydrographs • Indirectly connected impervious must be modeled separately • Wetlands must be shown on plans and any impacts noted • Pretreatment to volume control / filtration facilities • Skimmer device(s) • Soil borings • Tabulation of pre and post - development peak discharge rates • Adequate freeboard from critical high water elevations and emergency overflows to building low floor elevations and low building opening elevations Please contact Paul Hudalla at 763 - 287 -7176 or phudalla @wsbeng.com if you have any questions regarding the comments above. • • • S: Advisory Boards & Commissions\Planning & Zoning Board\Packets12013 Packets\ September 11, 20I3Utem 5ALFN\Updated Repat\4 Memo - JW - 090313 • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala P & Z MEETING DATE: September 11, 2013 REQUEST: Discussion Item — Legacy at Woods Edge Master Plan Concept Revisions APPLICANT: City of Lino Lakes REVIEW SCHEDULE: Not Applicable — City Initiated BACKGROUND The City is in the process of acquiring the remaining 20 acres of undeveloped land in the Legacy at Woods Edge project. Special Legislation was approved this year allowing for the conveyance of the property from the State of Minnesota to the City. City staff is working with Anoka County to complete the transfer. While marketing efforts have been ongoing, ownership of the property will allow the City to take on a more active role in its development. Over the past two years the City has received inquiries regarding possible development on the site in various forms not originally anticipated. Lino Lakes Assisted Living, currently beginning construction on a 36 unit expansion, is a recent example. Other proposals have included conversion of first floor commercial space to residential uses and construction of small lot single family homes. However, as previously suggested by the Planning and Zoning Board, it is in the best interests of the City to decide on a plan for the property rather than make decisions on a parcel by parcel basis. While the original master plan still holds value, there is a need to consider adjustments to 1) offer flexibility within a defined framework to accommodate changing market conditions, 2) evaluate impacts of land use decisions on adjacent property, and 3) evaluate the financial impacts of land use decisions. As part of this process the City has retained the services of Landform Professional Services to assist with the master plan evaluation. ANALYSIS Development Principles and Objectives Page 1 Legacy at Woods Edge Concepts P & Z Report 09/11/13 When the Legacy project was first envisioned and approved it was based on a set of core principles and objectives: • Develop land uses linked to local and regional transportation systems. • Connect housing and centers of employment, education, retail and recreational uses. • Provide a range of housing choices. • Protect and enhance natural resources. While it may not be readily observant, to a large degree these principles have remained intact and the many objectives accomplished on the site. This includes redevelopment of an underutilized 29 acre industrial and exterior storage site and construction of needed transportation improvements including the 35W interchange. Construction of the YMCA and expansion of the trail system through the regional park have been completed. 60 units of multi - family housing, along with the assisted living facility, have provided new housing options in town. Additionally, the site development allowed for preservation of 10 acres of wetland and 2.5 acres of wooded upland buffering the regional park. New events, such as the farmers market, are now beginning to take hold on the community green which is a first step to creating a community gathering place. From this standpoint revisiting the master plan does not call for an extreme makeover. Instead, the exercise can be described as an evaluation of options to provide flexibility as we reposition the project in a changing market. As a first step in the process we have drafted a base master plan with landuse alternatives on a block by block approach. This approach was used to simply recognize the different landuse areas within the development that can function independently and would likely be sold/developed separately. We have identified these as the Neighborhood Block, Town Square Block and Urban Block. Neighborhood Block The neighborhood block was originally guided for 190 attached residential units (townhomes). The concept master plan introduces a multi - family building on the west side of the block and transitions to attached units on the balance of the property. This option tends to maximize form, density and value. Option A includes a broader mix of housing types. The multi - family is maintained on the west side of the block and transitions to a detached single family project on smaller lot sizes. Option B replaces the multi - family component with attached units. Page 2 Legacy at Woods Edge Concepts P & Z Report 09/11/13 • • • Town Square Block The town square block was originally guided for civic uses (YMCA) and mixed uses allowing for first floor commercial with residential uses above. The concept master plan provides for a multi - family building on the west side of the block. Option A replaces the residential with commercial pads. Option B includes a civic /commercial component. This option is intended to show how a larger box type civic or commercial use could fit on the site. Urban Block The Urban Block was originally guided for mixed use (first floor commercial with housing above) along the community green. The balance of the property was guided for commercial. The concept master plan proposes commercial uses for the entire block. Option A incorporates the larger box type civic or commercial use in the northwest corner of the site. REQUESTED BOARD DIRECTION Staff is requesting board comments regarding the draft concepts. Please note that the proposed concepts are intended to illustrate options for development. However it will be necessary to amend the development standards to accommodate some of these uses. Accordingly, staff would like to receive feedback on the acceptability of the different concepts. Based on the board's comments, staff will develop a work plan to identify any necessary changes to the development design guidelines. ATTACHMENTS 1. Original Master Site Plan 2. Concept Master Site Plan and Alternatives Page 3 Legacy at Woods Edge Concepts P & Z Report 09/11/13 Land Use Plan for Legacy at Woods Edge Lino Wkn, M,. saute. f� t nwu+ we ACC/:s •102 fU*Aeti 1134 SO4AVAL 3C23012141 414•&10 .VAA.A. 410.01. 443.•Re. 1.►v01 .32,21(3 24 9 114330141.03 340085 311.343 f JY Ca •a&RGlt 05133 13303 1 1 13301 11.300 3.400 1 1 *104 33.100 3.00 1 3 4.000 *100 1303 1 1 *300 33.100 3300 1 3 3300 13.100 21.300 1 • 24. TOO 23.100 22 DAV 3 • UM 32.002 43 3.205 3 2 5.100 21100 3310 1 3 3200 14201 12 Ce4,124 13 Cbhnsuai 14 C1e44•501 34200 1 4 10300 31500 1000 1 3 10.000 33050 10.000 1 1 3000 33,323 10"X 3 14.230 10900 13300 3 10X•• 30030 15 hv3.a+ w 1K 14 3(4 33• 14 111C• 14 C23 .0 134 23 13 CcorerloOlva. 20100 1 4 20.330 20300 33 33900 1 • 21,003 13044 32 14 Y1KA 13 Lre339 F 3r. 23 Er 23* 21 4.0,0 11 He3 23 Eer,123152w04Cr44. 33 Eee.y MS49 .. • 301330 143.•10 mixed -use ice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park local trail connection proposed trail connection to regional trail . n C 4) IC 75 Q O o N C 0 C Q ^o W W �1 > o-�1•0 0V o J >, o C n E E O U V W 73 O E O Q � O co > � 4) 0 0 CTS 0) (1) J Site Plan 177] • • • LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE NORTH 119,500 S.F. COMMERCIAL CIVIC /COMMERCIAL 226,650 S.F. 3 -STORY HIGH - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 98 TOWNHOME UNITS SINGLE FAMILY UNITS EXISTING STRUCTURES 0 80' 160' • • • • L A N D F O R M • • From Site io Finish SITE MASTER PLAN 09.03.2013 aarAce marks of LanEMm PIUlaaalONl service., LLC LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE NORTH COMMERCIAL CIVIC/COMMERCIAL 112,650 S.F. 3-STORY HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (37,550 S.F. FOOTPRINT) TOWNHOMES 34 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS EXISTING STRUCTURES 80' 160' • • LAND F OR M From Site to Finish • OPTION A NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK 09.03.2013 Firish... neg.. sank* mama Lanakom Now*. Son., L. CITY OF (INS KES LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE 0 NORTH • • COMMERCIAL CIVIC /COMMERCIAL HIGH - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 14 TOWNHOME UNITS 34 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS EXISTING STRUCTURES 80' 160' • • L A N D F O R M • From Site to Finish OPTION B NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK 09.03.2013 laldlomi• aM 5111110 finish• re rgsWred service marlu of lamlfmm Prot*. Smiwa, LLC. • • LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE 0 46,000 S.F. COMMERCIAL CIVIC /COMMERCIAL HIGH - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TONMHOME UNITS SINGLE FAMILY UNITS EXISTING STRUCTURES 80' 160' • •, • L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish OPTION A TOWN SQUARE BLOCK 09.03.2013 La ndlumi6 and Sib b FlMSkF are registered some marks M Lan.. FaMsbnal Services . LLC EIT 1 TOWN1 SQUARE BLOCK LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE NORTH • COMMERCIAL 31,300 S F. CIVIC/COMMERCIAL HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME UNITS SINGLE FAMILY UNITS EXISTING STRUCTURES 0 80' 160' • • L A NDFORM • • From Site to Finish • • OPTION B TOWN SQUARE BLOCK 09.03.2013 nefi,... t samce marks a L..era. Notes.lonal Senolos • • • LEGACY AT WOODS EDGE NORTH 75,400 S.F. COMMERCIAL 32,000 S.F. CIVIC /COMMERCIAL HIGH - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME UNITS SINGLE FAMILY UNITS EXISTING STRUCTURES 0 80' 160' • • • A N D F OR M From Site to Finish OPTIONA URBAN BLOCK 09.03.2013 b R.I. m. r.gl.\md ..M . marks of L.MMm Nal...lanal Services. LLC