The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/09/2000 P&Z Packet• CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, February 9, 2000 6:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 12, 2000 III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: IV. OPEN MIKE: V. ACTION ITEMS: A. Highland Meadows, Site Plan Review for Townhomes and Final PDO Plan— Cindy Sherman,NAC B. PUBLIC HEARING, Shiloh Church, 1189 Main Street, Conditional Use Permit, Mary Kay Wyland • C. PUBLIC HEARING Continue to 3/8/00 Meeting), Bluebill Ponds, Preliminary Plat, Jeff Smyser D. Tom & Roxanne Traver, 6750 West Shadow Lake Road, Variance, Mary Kay Wyland E. Anoka County Parks, Beach Improvements, Centerville Lake, Jeff Smyser VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Town Center Update: Rezoning & Special Meetings VII. ADJOURNMENT: • • • • Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT : January 12, 2000 6.30 P.M. • 8 • :53 P.M. : Johnson, Schilling, Corson (6 :34), Schaps, Rafferty, Zych, and Lane : None Planning Coordinator, Wyland,; City Planner, Smyser; City Engineer, Powe11; Environmental Specialist, Asleson (part) I. II. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning p.m., January 12, 2000. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to Zoning Board, and was supported Mr. Rafferty made a MOTI Zoning Board, and was suppo d meeting to order at 6:30 Schaps for Chair of the Planning and illing. Motion carried 6 -0. inate Ms. Lane for Vice -Chair of the Planning and . Schilling. Motion carried 6 -0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — December 8,1999 Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to approve the presented minutes of the December 8, 1999, meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board, and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 5 -0 -2 with Mr. Zych and Mr. Rafferty abstaining. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Item VIIC, EDAC Update, was added to the agenda. The amended agenda was approved as presented. Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 2 V. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared open mike open at 6:35 p.m.. Mr. Johnson moved to close open mike at 6:35 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 7 -0. VI. ACTION ITEMS A. Martha Houle/Herman Zuettel, 1600 Birch Street, Subdivison Staff advised this case involves a request for a minor subdivision of the property on the south/west corner of Birch Street and Centerville Road. The site is approximately 40 acres in size and zoned Rural. The existing land use map indicates the site as rural. The draft comprehensive plan guides the property for rural development through 2010 and low /medium density residential on the western edge and commercial on the eastern edge some time after 2010. There are considerable wetlands on the parcel, particularly on the eastern edge along Centerville Road. A single family home is under construction on area was previously considered for a minor s piece from the balance of the site. The app can consideration. The owners of the propert parcels. Parcel A would contain 15 a requirements of the ordinance whi lot frontage. Wort .8 .t corner of the parcel. This on that would have split a 10 acre t drew the request prior to Board like to split the site into two 24.9 acres. Both parcels will meet the inimum of 10 acres in size with 330' of Staff recommended approv nor subdivision based on conditions. Chair Schaps asked which applica "t is building the house. Staff advised Ms. Houle's son is building a home on the 15 acre parcel. Ms. Lane asked for the reason behind the condition regarding City sewer and water. Staff advised the plan originally involved moving an existing home onto the property. The assessment policy has been revised to enable utilization of City utilities. This condition was part of the previous approval that has never been satisfied. Staff noted the assessment is reasonable. Mr. Corson asked about the future land use plan for the area. Staff referred to a map indicated the area is in the second growth plan of the draft Comprehensive Plan. The north/east corner is shown as commercial. The balance of the area is low to medium residential. Mr. Rafferty asked if both land users understand the land plan is for after the year 2010. He also asked if there is a completion plan for the house that is under construction. Staff • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 3 advised the land users are aware the land use plan is for after 2010. Staff also advised there is a plan for the home being built. The hold up on the home being built is the fact there is not clear title to the property. At this time the property is in joint ownership. The subdivision should correct that and the applicant will be able to obtain a mortgage. Chair Schaps asked if the City has a time limit regarding the completion of homes. Staff advised there is a long period of time for completion that is part of the building code. Builders need to show continuous progress. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve minor subdivision based on the following conditions: 1. An additional 27' of right -of -way for Centerville Road shall be dedication to Anoka County along the easterly border of the parcel. 2. The single family home currently under construction on the westerly parcel must connect to City water with the understanding that there is a deferred assessment on the balance of the property payable upon future • lopment of the site. This differed assessment shall also apply to the newly creat 1B and also . be payable upon future development of that site. 3. Any development on the easterly parce hal ire Park Dedication as outlined in the Subdivision Ordinance. The MOTION was supported by • o Motion carried 7 -0. This item will go before the �`i Monday, January 24, 2000, 6:30 p.m. A. Thomas McDo <''k, 25 Ash Street, Subdivision Staff advised Mr. Tom McDonough is the owner of two parcels of property in the south/west corner of the City. Parcel lA contains 2.47 acres and a single family home, Parcel 2A contains 2.82 acres, and the total site is 5.29 acres. The City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 10 acres as the property is Zoned Rural, guided rural in the existing land use plan and is located outside the MUSA boundary. However, both parcels are considered pre- existing non - conforming lots of record. The vacant parcel is buildable as it exists. The draft comprehensive plan guides the area for residential and the specific parcels for medium density residential. Mr. McDonough is asking for a minor subdivision that would allow the sale of the existing home on a one acre lot with the combination of the balance of the site and potential sale of that parcel as a 4.24 +/- acre parcel. There is a large wetland on the north/west corner of the property, which would not preclude any future construction on that parcel. Staff reviewed the description of the surrounding property and the Findings of Fact. Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 4 Staff recommended approval of minor subdivision and variance based on conditions. Staff noted Mr. McDonough does have a buyer for both parcels. Chair Schaps clarified the variance is needed for a subdivision less than 10 acres that is not served by City sewer. He asked how long the applicant has owned the property. Staff advised Mr. McDonough has owned the property since 1982. He was advised in the mid 80's that City sewer was coming soon. Staff noted that it is unlikely utilities will be available in this area unless a development goes in enabling the City to assess the costs. Mr. Zych asked about the large wetland in the area. Staff referred to a map pointing out the wetlands noting that the property is developable. Chair Schaps asked if the applicant will be building on the 4+ acre parcel. Staff advised the applicant has a buyer for the larger parcel. The buyer will build a home on the property. Ms. Lane indicated she would be more comfortabl Iwo septic systems on the site. Staff advised the five adjoining lots are one acr ts. T ptic designer has established an alternate system site. Ms. Lane asked for verification on the loc fi` septic system. Staff referred to a map pointing out the existing system s ! th ernate site. Chair Schaps asked about the age i e Wing septic system. Mr. McDonough came for has an 1800 — 1900 gallon tan couple of times. ed the system was put in early 1980. The system in good shape. The system has been repaired a Staff advised the provision in the ordinance indicates a future site for a system is required. The variance is for the larger parcel. Mr. Corson asked about alternatives. Staff advised they did not look at making the home site larger than one acre. Different configurations for the one acre parcel were looked at. Mr. McDonough stated he has someone interested in the larger parcel to build a home on the site. The builder may eventually want to split the lot for his children. Mr. Rafferty asked how the subdivision fits into the draft Comprehensive Plan. Staff advised Mr. McDonough has no intentions of pursuing multi - family zoning. Staff will recommend keeping the area residential. • • • v • • • Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 5 Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve minor subdivision and variance based on the following conditions: 1. The applicant provide a current survey of the two new parcels. The lot containing the dwelling shall be one acre in size with 227' of lot frontage and configured as indicated on sketch B, which is attached. The vacant parcel shall be combined into one 4+ acre parcel. 2. The applicant shall provide documentation that there is an alternate site for a septic system on the existing homesite should the existing system fail. 3. Park Dedication shall be required for any new construction on the larger parcel per the Subdivision Ordinance. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 7 -0. This item will go before the Council Monday, January 24, 2000, 6:30 p.m. A. PUBLIC HEARING, (Continue uary 9, 2000, Shiloh Church, Main Street, Conditional Use Permit Staff recommended the public hearing be ene continued to the February 9, 2000, Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Chair Schaps declared the public Mr. Corson made a MOTIO Planning and Zoning Board 0. t 7:05 p.m. the public hearing to the February 9, 2000, d was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 7- D. PUBLIC HEARING, Shafer Contracting, 7504 Lake Drive, Conditional Use Permit and Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Staff advised Shafer Contracting has received the contract for concrete pavement resurfacing on 35W from MnDOT. This work is scheduled to take place between April and June /July of 2000. The project area is from Sunset Road north easterly to the 35W/35E junction. Shafer Contracting would like to set up their batch plant on the Tagg property (Artic Sandblasting) at 7504 Lake Drive. Temporary, portable concrete batch plants are needed to conform to MnDOT's specifications /limits for concrete placement within 30 minutes of production. This location will provide quick access, reduce traffic conflicts with hauling trucks, eliminate the need for Shafer to dismantle and relocate their plant during resurfacing, and provide timely completion of the project. They have signed a lease agreement with the property owner. Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 6 In review of this item, City staff has concluded that an interim use permit may be the appropriate vehicle to facilitate this proposal. The property is Zoned LB, Limited Business and is the only LB District within the City. Staff proposed an Ordinance Text Amendment that would add "Temporary Concrete Batch Plant" as an Interim Use within the Limited Business Zoning District. It is also anticipated that in the near future this entire site (Town Center) will be rezoned to a more appropriate category to facilitate the future plans for the Town Center. This interim use permit would not affect the ultimate development of the area. The LB Zoning District in this location is a very temporary condition. The City Engineer and the Environmental Board have reviewed this request. Staff reviewed to a copy of their comments and the conditions of approval incorporate their suggestions. Staff recommended approval of an Interim Use Permit to Shafer Contracting for a Temporary Concrete Batch Plant at 7504 Lake Drive based on conditions. Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 7:06 p.m. Chair Schaps asked how the dust will be kept down if the applicant is confident about their method of dust control Mr. Greg Palke, representative for Shafer Co be used. Water is used on the in and out d : vew removed on the project site. The potentia Chair Schaps asked if the bank an neighboring businesses are aware Ms. Lane asked for clarific to a picture and explained wha , stated dust collection systems will he existing surface will not be the truck traffic. are of these plans. Staff advised the pr" ct and have not made any comments. ing a Temporary Batch Plant. Mr. Palke referred Mr. Corson asked about the schedule for north/south bound lanes and the number of truck trips per day on the site. Mr. Palke stated the project will begin on the south bound lane. There will be a large number of truck trips per day. Staff advised they do not anticipate any major chaos with the traffic. The south bound ramp will be closed during construction and vise versa when there is construction on the north bound lane. There will be no traffic contribution from the freeway ramp. Chair Schaps asked if regular sweeping will occur. He also asked if the speed limit in the area will be reduced. Mr. Palke indicated regular sweepings will occur. He stated a reduced speed limit would be beneficial. Staff advised it is possible to get the speed limit reduced. The road is a County road and a request has to be made to the County. Staff advised they will speak to the County about a reduced speed limit. • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 7 Mr. Schilling commented on 3,500 yards being a typical pour. He asked if there is a back up plan. Mr. Palke stated there is not a back up plan and they would have to shut down for the day if there is a problem. Mr. Schilling asked about the addition of additives and hours of operation. Mr. Palke indicated the additives used are required. There will be no danger to the environment. The working hours will be approximately 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 - 8:00 p.m. Mr. Schilling expressed concern regarding the clean up issue and asked that it be addressed. Mr. Rafferty asked if the main entrance and exit to the site will be through the Tagg property. Mr. Palke advised the entrance for the raw material will be through the Tagg site. It is anticipated that access will be put through the freeway fence for the north bound lane. Chair Schaps asked about the number of raw loads p ay. Mr. Palke advised raw materials would be hauled before operation. The of loads will try to be minimized. The loads will be delivered to the s from freeway. Staff noted MnDOT wants the project co lete. my 4, 2000. Weight limits on the roads could be an issue. Mr. Palke added the project is app Sunset. miles in length, from Lexington to Mr. Johnson made a MOTIF to a ove Ordinance Text Amendment to add Temporary Concrete Batch Plant as an Int I se to the Limited Business Zoning District based on the staff report, and was supporte. .y Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 7 -0. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to approve Interim Use Permit for Temporary Concrete Batch Plan based on the following conditions: 1. The City adopt Ordinance No. xx — 2000 adding Temporary Concrete Batch Plant as an Interim Use to the Limited Business Zoning District. 2. The Batch Plant shall be located as far west as possible to avoid negative impacts on the wetlands at the eastern edge of the Tagg property. 3. Hours of operation shall not be subject to the restrictions of Ordinance No. 04 — 96 due to the nature of this project. • 4. Should access to the freeway occur directly from the Tagg property, location and site grading shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 8 5. The use shall terminate upon completion of the project and the site shall be returned to its pre - constructed state. Shafer Contracting shall provide communication to the City stipulating this completion date along with a bond or letter of credit in an amount determined by the City Engineer to guarantee site restoration. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 7 -0. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:25 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 7 -0. This item will go before the City Council Monday, January 24, 2000, 6:30 p.m. E. PUBLIC HEARING, Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to add Exterior Storage as a Conditional Use in the Light Industrial Zoning District Staff requested the Planning and Zoning Board consider amending the Zoning Ordinance to add Exterior Storage as an accessory use in the Lid' dustrial Zoning District with a Conditional Use Permit. Staff referred to the draf nce and reviewed the special provisions. Staff recommended approval of the Ordin . sce to endment. Chair Schaps asked if this included b es rage sheds. Staff advised this only involves outside storage. Chair Schaps asked if there is �� garding more than one approval on one lot. Staff advised the amendme ow •r exterior storage with a conditional use permit. Each case will be reviewed in 'ly. Mr. Rafferty stated ordinance and special provisions are an outline for residents. He expressed concern regarding the language "appropriate manner" used in the provisions. He clarified that each case will be reviewed by staff, Planning and Zoning, and the City Council. Chair Schaps suggested the language be changed to read "in a manner approved by the City ". Mr. Johnson asked if there is a limit to screening height. He also suggested the language in the provisions be cleaned up. He stated he would prefer that a storage area not abut a paved street. Staff advised if a variance must be granted for a fence higher than 10 feet. A provision regarding storage areas not abutting a paved street would restrict H. & L. Mesabi Inc. and other sites along 74th Street. • • • • Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 9 Mr. Schilling asked if the City has control over the type of material that can be stored. Staff advised that legally the City couldn't distinguish between types of materials. It was noted that at times storage material can stick up over a fence. Therefore, storage will be limited to internal light industrial properties. Mr. Zych suggested this item be deferred in order to clean up the provision language. He asked why staff is requesting a change in the ordinance that was adopted two years ago. Staff clarified the difference between accessory use and principal use. The 1997 ordinance allowed a conditional use permit for exterior storage as an accessory use meaning the business had to have another principal use. Exterior storage as a principle use is allowed as interim use only that will be terminated at some future date or event. Mr. Corson asked if the 4:1 ratio has been thought over carefully. Staff advised the ratio should be changed to 3:1. Staff also advised that changing the original ordinance by deleting exterior storage as an accessory use was an error. Chair Schaps clarified the amendment will allow for backyard storage that cannot be seen from the freeway, prohibits abutting a neighborhood school, will require fencing, screening and an impervious surface, and cannot b it. He noted the city does have rights regarding the storage of hazardous mater Mr. Johnson referred to the Lakes Industri discretion regarding the types of business the amendment. This particular situa Par mg the developer does have There are a number of safeguards in e quite rare. Mr. Rafferty stated he will want to The amendment puts the gui Chair Schaps declared the pub recommendation with each application. ce for each applicant. ing open at 7:54 p.m. Mr. Barry Birnberg, Real Estate Broker, came forward and asked if the front yard is the same as the side yard. Staff advised front and side yard is not the same. Mr. Biernberg stated the first draft of the amendment showed a 4:1 ratio. It has been suggested to change it to 3:1. He indicated their storage area is a little over 3:1 and they abut the prison. Staff suggested the ratio be changed to 3.5:1. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:55 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 7 -0. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to adopt Ordinance No. xx — 2000, as presented, including the following provisions: Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 10 a. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of neighboring uses and residential zoning districts and public rights -of -way per section 3, Subdivision 4.S. of the zoning ordinance. b. Storage area is fenced in a manner approved by the City. c. Storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced unless specifically approved by the City Council. d. All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.H. of this Ordinance or other lighting standards in place at the time of project approval. e. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity of this Ordinance and shall not be in a front yard. f. The property shall not abut property zoned for residential, rural, or business use, including land in a neighboring city. "Abuttinw" includes across a street. "Abutting" does not include properties that touc 3w" y corner- to- corner. g. The property shall not abut I -35W h. The storage area shall not abut scho a public park. i. The ratio of storage area t i1 ootprint shall not exceed 3.5:1. Motion carried 7 -0. F. PUBLIC HEARIN Cori ue to February 9, 2000, Bluebill Ponds, The MOTION was supported by Preliminary Plat Staff recommended the Planning and Zoning Board open and continue the public hearing to February 9, 2000, Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 7:57 p.m. Ms. Lane made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to the February 9, 2000, Planning and Zoning Board meeting and was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 7 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Town Center Update: Rezoning and Special Meetings Staff advised they have been working with Calthorpe and Associates on the Town Center Master plan, which was funded by a grant from the Metropolitan Council. The Town • I • • • Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 11 Center will be a new zoning district with its own zoning standards. Staff distributed a map of the land use plan and schedule for review and rezoning of the Town Center. A preliminary master plan has been developed that includes mini zoning districts that will be pedestrian friendly. Staff reviewed the City process that the zoning amendment will have to go through. Staff requested the Planning and Zoning Board schedule six special meetings to review sections of the master plan. The meetings will be open to the public and land owners. The Planning and Zoning Board scheduled the following meetings: 1. Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 7:00 a.m. 2. Tuesday, February 1, 2000, 7:00 a.m. Chair Schaps requested Planning and Zoning Board members let staff know their preference for the following four meetings. Staff added each Board member will receive th the first meeting. A. Environmental Manage Mr. J.P. Houchins, Chair of the E Environmental Management Plan statement about the need for on the formation of the Env' Specialists were brought in to the environment within developm st sec'1 of the master plan prior to Board, stated the City has worked on an ears. The 20/20 Vision plan made a strong ntal plan. Mr. Houchins gave the background Board and the Environmental Management Plan. a plan and recommendations on how to maintain Mr. Houchins and Mr. Asleson, Environmental Specialist, conducted a slide presentation of the Environmental Management Plan to the Planning and Zoning Board. Mr. Corson asked how trail connections will be constructed over wetlands. Mr. Houchins advised the Plan indicates trail corridors for future connections. He noted that achieving the objectives of the plan will require a commitment from all parties involved. Chair Schaps stated the document is impressive. He expressed appreciation for all the work put into the plan. He asked if the Environmental Board will make a recommendation regarding where to start with the Plan. Planning & Zoning Board January 12, 2000 Page 12 Mr. Houchins advised the Board will make recommendations. The Board wants a commitment from the City Council that the recommendations will be considered. Chair Schaps asked if recommendations for specific areas will be made. Mr. Houchins stated the Board will take sections of the City and carefully go through them. Recommendations about each section will be made. Mr. Corson asked about an area that is forested north/east of Lake Amelia. Mr. Houchins indicated there is a large area of wetlands north/east of Lake Amelia. Staff advised the recommendations in the plan are important and the City will try to implement them in the future. Some recommendations, such as preservation development and conservation easements, have already been implemented. B. EDAC Update Mr. Johnson advised EDAC wants to get more inv development within commercial /industrial sites for 15 possible sites. EDAC would like to m for these sites. A tour of the sites may be noted the Environmental Board will need the matter of the City's business zone It for those zones. ith the potential for inve and matrix will be provided commendation regarding the best use within the next few months. He ed also. EDAC is also rethinking eneficial to use performance standards Staff advised Board Member sites and a numbered map will be provided for their review. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Corson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:53 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 7 -0. Respectfully Submitted, Kim Points, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V A Jeff Smyser/ Cindy Sherman,NAC February 9, 2000 Site Plan Review for Townhomes and Final PDO Plan, Highland Meadows The staff report was prepared on behalf of City staff by Cindy Sherman of NAC. Ms. Sherman's report is attached and she will present this agenda item. • • NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Cindy Sherman /Alan Brixius DATE: February 1, 2000 RE: Lino Lakes — Highland Meadows Multi- family Site Plan FILE NO: 194.01 -00.01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background On January 10, 2000 the City Council approved the amended preliminary plat and amended PDO for the Highland Meadows subdivision. As required by the ordinance and as one of the conditions of the approval T.S.M. Development has submitted a complete site plan application for the townhome development. The site plan is subject to the review of the Planning and Zoning Board for recommendation and the approval of the City Council. The applicant has also submitted the Final Plat for Highland Meadows West and is seeking approval for the Final Plat to proceed. The site is zoned R -3, Medium Density Residential and is designated for Single Family Residential use in the City's 1990 Comprehensive Plan which was amended to allow the attached housing. To accommodate the development proposal, the following approval is necessary: 1. Site Plan review for the multi - family area. 2. Final Plat for Highland Meadows West. Attached for reference: Exhibits A: Site location B: Landscape Plan C: Exterior Elevations D: Interior Floor Plans E: Final Plat- Highland Meadows West 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2- 595 -9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E -MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM • • • Highland Meadows Multi - Family Site Plan Page 2 • Recommendation • • NAC recommends approval of the Final Plat for Highland Meadows West and approval of the Site Plan for Highland Meadows Multi - Family Area with the following conditions: 1. The final landscape plan is subject to the review and approval of the City Environmental Specialist. a) A foundation - planting plan shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. b) Landscape plantings shall be added on the south side of Oak Drive and around ponding /wetland to include native materials /seeds as buffer areas and as part of the surface water treatment train. 2. Access to units 35 and 36 shall be provided from the north and no access shall be provided from the cul -de -sac. 3. Curb cuts shall be limited to 26 feet in width for accesses onto public roads with a minimum 10 -foot separation. 4. Green space /rock separations shall be eliminated between driveways. 5. A lighting plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Police Dept. 6. Street, drainage and utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. All conditions of Preliminary Plat approval remain in effect. Issues Analysis SITE PLAN Site Plan Layout The site plan layout is consistent with the approved preliminary plat with regard to density, lot size and setbacks. Residential Units Each structure contains four units with two common walls in each unit. Each unit has two exterior walls with windows and access that includes a regular door and a patio door. Each unit has a 14'x7' concrete patio area outside the front entry with a 4'x7' slab at the regular door access. The exterior of the units is proposed to be a combination of vinyl lap siding with brick trim and asphalt shingles. The buildings are all slab on grade, two -story townhome units with two bedrooms, 1 -' baths, kitchen, living room, dining room, and laundry area. Each unit has an attached double garage. Highland Meadows Multi - Family Site Plan Page 3 Landscaping Plan A landscaping plan has been submitted for the general area. Plantings have been concentrated in areas abutting existing development. No foundation plantings have been shown but they are required and the applicant is preparing a plan. The ordinance requires a minimum open space of 35% and the site as proposed provides 52% open space. We believe that additional plantings /groundcover should be provided on the south side of Oak Drive and surrounding the wetlands. The landscape plan is subject to the review and approval of the City Environmental Specialist. Access /Parking Curb cuts or driveway access is limited to 26 feet in width. There are several areas where this is exceeded in order to provide direct access into each unit. The accesses should be narrowed to meet the ordinance. The accesses may be widened outside of the right -of -way. The ordinance requires 2 Y2 spaces per unit, which is 130 parking spaces. Each unit has two interior spaces and two exterior spaces plus 26 guest parking stalls for a total of 234 spaces provided. It appears that units 35 and 36 could be served by extending the drive from the north and eliminating the access onto the cul -de -sac. This option should be explored along with other measures to enhance access. Drainage and Utilities Detailed grading, drainage and utility plans have been submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer. FINAL PLAT T.S.M. Development Inc. has submitted an application for Final Plat. The request is to plat 55 single family lots, 52 multi - family lots, a lot for common space in the multi - family area and Outlots A -F as Highland Meadows West. The proposed final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. CONCLUSION The site plan is consistent with the general layout submitted with the preliminary plat and it meets the intent of the ordinance regulations. The final plat is also consistent with the approved preliminary plat. We recommend approval of the site plan and final plat with the conditions as outlined in the recommendation section of this report. )x•11. r i > t t : -_L 6 t 1 I I�' 1 A/TePM: ' • 1 �; 1 ' :S U. pIVI • z' R -X R -. -a: R i I. , • I0 1 PINE • • � VISTA f. /i i3B B 12 R 1! /9 QPV1 E `v.5 11 r 121 ACC •.• a •.- .•.•..c rn —r PSPJIIk 0 • •/ • 1(' • �.• s'e1-w rr;4� o: ■S:NISEr• •1 • 's R -X • / • . • .• • 1.1 1111 ••• .• ..e r.. .:•LAKE 2 V:E • • f i ' /� t: ! n. •u• • ir w 1.1' 1'- •■■ ... I J�rl. /l:___ • L Icy'' RJa • 1I -. , r. t • • • EXHIBIT A GEORGE ,I 5 WATCH •...x le Ut:Ix',1AefIS UN:1.1X'Xii!2.1.4 Si.LVOSSV V1ft19V I , r.) SXOCISOIV ONV11411 91 4 :• A NVId 3dVOSONV-1 ) t 1 X . 1 1 i a I • • • xx� 1 „J a u to !Pi N e so all �A ab EXHIBIT C .:unMP r r 0 • • • • t. • I .rs _ el!' 'Qs ;'• it " • • 39c 7 it 1— S I try :-:-17>t 2 - — ' — 2 t 7-1: 791 ". I :- , p "-- 1,7%.111 4t k 1.11, s Lor 1 uJ 1 , . 1 II. )1 -1' • id-r; ofsv5 I i 1 14 ' , I 1 •f----.. . 4 L. I • z 0 r'111= 2 !E1:7 2! , e 2 4 It 3 r 1 ' f-D ' f 't • ; ! 1". 1 1: 24 I • si A Vt)F \ (111,N TY %I ILV} VCPIt !?: 4 4 4 17. 1 1 •i .- ..17. .: 4sirf a il ”ci 61 t il1i if W; 1 sr i/.2 ... <1:., a !1•1 IV" ,t4 CI 4V, .5 =II° 210., -r , t '.... 1 .i ..:.; ;41, .-1 '. iz I .0 4 :4 67Z; ;t1 ill! 1 g3 rt .r, .4-i ait=1 2-'1 !; ! ..,:5ii 1.3. illgl llit 3/ 3! 41- 4.? '13 i 92 I; .014;_i 14 22=; .51 iii:. /7; :JIM Ei1 31 Pg4:4 : ..1:t."112;11iii1 iAlt.i ill Ilsii ;t 1 1 1 ;117,g 21,1 4,02::. — - - ill - 14 -81 714 FLI 111 vdg N.; 424 !lc 1 24. 44 1% 9 1 3 51. oi 14 fag <1 ' 5 0 0 o 0 sl LL1 • - E •E'., 1 cci 1U. lnLAINHI cc 17:1 21 N011d30X3 )0 40311031*1.340 3',.1,I ‘1.S1 , 00,0L 3 .30./9.00 .1 I ..0Z 3 .N.Ig.00 N ir " N11/1 c133X3 00,oL 3 .90 .10.00 Z+.1 IILT99 At A*0.10.00 0 00'008 3 .ta aA.00 St' P V•cg‘iii.'Lloer.s:, a " ").:117` ,:;,P3.1V1,7; :;`3,';'llt: 7-.22 .1103 3113 10. 40 11*3013 33- • 8 . 8 1r 11 ;r:•/I ).■ )4S •0 .01, /3 ay) az' vac 0'3 40 LjStLIt,11.. 40 731 300* traiz 3 -90 40.00 14 •■•■ 06?% 'FS 0326,0 IA • __J3_--- 0 XIS t,- a 4/ 61- 11.1;151.:').71;'L:Xea.f):12").);`,4. w 3- 3. 1 so•ros 3 ..9C .40.00 N 00'919 3 .51 N —J ZCZLZI 3 .9C .LY.00 N 1 1. 1 " " 7:t -3 0- 441 t{ V If '1 )is 'on ./1 +A •0 .101, ;0 tf it • • • ! • L 66'l 3 -St N Lt1L9 3 T>t .1.O0 N mi ....; t.:•t• .". r-. _ \ 'Is 1 "i;\ •,-;-, .,4 • „.„,;• yr ...i. . . _ _ . „., . . . ,, . i - t" j. :. .7.—.: : ' " ;.-. . , ,, , tl :,.. ::. . . cc:. : :1 :. .. . o..--..., • e .4 4:, .• • .1. .'s . -1.. ‘-‘• .s .- • , %. ‘.'. • '...',” , •'''. . : •AS ••I5 ,,t. .t. St • ' „1„ .• . ...IC •1•10 • • 6 0 7:: ".1.4 • I ACM • • • • ,,,, .... ; = r cr.•: oc .s: - g o ' .*t •94., .7 NI. • •C • • .... , .. .......... ...... .. • .. ........... i+1 N 89.15'49, w Oe 901'SC - 3 AC at•00 N 1 r •1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 _L_ _1 0S1t9 3 0,1 .1 N " ,.. 4..4.4., _ __,10..__L.,..20.0.3. . _ T:_______ 6...f.i sz .teino3 2vo . . - '' ,:.2 ... t • .110■ 1 .•• .01.00 • ..• -,, 7,64, ' : ... m.. : 1. ... ;55 3. • 3 Apr---..4' : . : • S Cr c\ •,:;.• „ .80.0, -I ••• ..“6".. ...fi 46. g: ,. • r---.......... rr • tk":. 7.1 4 5 C•Or • • s•cc - .. .......... r oo: , Go N 4 . • ,z ,•, ,4,- , ' l... '. ..N ...,- C V. .) . ! ..2 .1fr',:• 4 t: .4i ..ig° i i r r . .g . 7 E E T1 1 . 00 .7I. 1 ,.:.; 0,,, I (,p : ; ::.: , • - , .. E -. . .. '! . t!.''<': I, - • . . ,A• . 0 1 "::: . r'":" . : 4, - 3w- : :' :: — . ••I0• . ' 14 . 3 •:- a To • . -'-3-.N.cilor ' n .-ell;:‘ 0> :::.7`.... s:. ..-7 g•••..r<r ---- - s3; •r::: 5 89'12'03" E 130750 r 2 i . , „ X , . . , , • . ' N < .. ■ ( G,1 '... g 2 cx : .i..4.t.•-• . • , I' ... 001 VI 2 x 40, • __ ‘-CYL -01.01.0C = • , I-, CC • ••s, / •••• r V. 00 CE-996 3 ..9C .L.P.00 N -48 tot-cr t• .., :- gl t.' 0001 / • • • • Memorandum DATE: February 2, 2000 TO: Jeff Smyser, City Planner FROM: John Powell, City Enginee RE: Highland Meadows Townho es Review of Preliminary Plan In addition to the comments we have provided previously with regard to the Highland Meadows plat, please note the following: 1. The minimum pipe size for storm sewer is 15 -inch. 2. The minimum pipe size for watermain is 8 -inch. 3. The drawing scale shown in the legend on sheets 3 and 4 are incorrect. The correct scale should illustrate a 1 " =60' scale. 4. Gate valves need to be shown on the proposed water main. Valves shall be placed throughout the distribution system so that each portion may be isolated with the least interruption of service. Generally, place valves at each roadway intersection or intersection of water mains. If you have any questions, please let me know. • • AGENDA ITEM V. B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: February 9, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Conditional Use Permit Shiloh Church, 1189 Main Street BACKGROUND Shiloh Church of Lino Lakes has approached the Lino Lakes Senior Citizens requesting permission to use their space at 1189 Main Street (the old City Hall) for church services. The property is Zoned Rural. Churches are only allowed with a conditional use permit (CUP). The Seniors lease a portion of the City's building at 1189 Main Street. The Seniors asked the City Council in October last year if it would be acceptable for them to schedule other groups in their space. The City Council was comfortable with this, and they agreed that the Seniors could do so. However, neither staff nor the City Council knew the contemplated use was a church. When staff learned this, after the church began using the facility, we advised them they needed a CUP. The Shiloh Church has, therefore, submitted this application for a CUP to use the old City Hall building for their church services. In addition to the church needing a CUP, the City's lease with the Seniors did not provide for other users. City staff has reviewed that lease and is revising it to ensure that the Seniors can schedule other users in the building and that a church can be accommodated. The Seniors will be able to schedule their leased space according to guidelines in the lease document. These guidelines will include churches with a CUP. Required CUP Findings and Criteria As stated in Section 2 Subd. 2 of the Zoning Ordinance (Conditional Use Permits), the Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. b. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and /or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. e. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. f. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. g. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. h. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. i. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. In addition, according to the Section 5, Subd. 1.H. 5 (conditional uses in the Rural zoning district), a CUP may be granted for churches provided the following criteria are reviewed: a. Side yard setbacks shall not be less than fifty (50) feet. b. Adequate screening from abutting residential uses and landscaping is provided in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.S. of this Ordinance. c. Adequate off - street parking and access is provided on the site or on lots directly abutting directly across a public street or alley to the principal use in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 5 of this Ordinance and that such parking is adequately screened and landscaped from surrounding and abutting residential uses in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.S of this Ordinance. d. Adequate off - street loading and service entrances are provided and regulated where applicable by Section 3, Subd. 6 of this Ordinance. • We believe the above findings and criteria are satisfied. The church will make no alterations to the existing building. No activity will occur outside the building that would affect the neighboring residences. Parking by church members will not be any different than parking by City employees or others at the building. Therefore, the new use does not warrant any new screening or landscaping. The parking ordinance requires 1 space per 4 seats based on design capacity. The "church" has a estimated capacity of approximately 200 seats: 100 in the old Council Chambers and another 100 in the Senior Center area. This would equate to 50 parking spaces. The parking areas in the front and east side of the building totals about 60 parking spaces. There could be another 20 on the west side of the building. Adequate parking is available on the site. At this time the church has a congregation of approximately 50 members. We will monitor the parking situation and if it becomes a problem, we can address it in the future. Conditions of Approval Staff recommends approval of this conditional use permit based on the listed findings and criteria. The following conditions should apply: 1. Shiloh Church shall enter into a facility use agreement with the Lino Lakes Seniors subject to the Seniors' lease with the City. 2. Adequate parking must continue to be available. Parking shall be reviewed annually by City Staff to assure adequate capacity for continued use of the facility by the Church. If parking becomes inadequate due to growth in church membership, the City may require the church to relocate. The City shall establish a reasonable amount of time for the church to do so. 3. The church will be allowed a temporary sign, to be placed no more than one hour prior to events and removed one hour following events. The sign size and other characteristics shall meet with the requirements of the City's Sign Ordinance (no flashing beacons). A sign permit is required. OPTIONS 1. Approve Conditional Use Permit for Shiloh Church based on findings in the report and with the conditions listed above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration 3. Deny request RECOMMENDATION• • Option 1 Y TIVREMIEBN ...r Nklf 1 '��1l hki�/ 111111=-1-7 Al inumri 11 7111,111 Maw -m� . Aca e 2o- RENTS RQNDEAU LAKE • S ,S „vn1WS[OTT. 1 Sub. .: ' -��etn�11 j R7 rPOr _O 7MU ".441w alviutirrrildrilio ZS- AK 'EI VIEWi IZ 1 PELTIER AR (N' PELTIER L • GEORGE WATCH LAKE 1.` X-- • rCz YCL iLE x— x 60' 0 x x x WEL co 4t4 �YJ EE oN So GRAVEL co -i 0 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 1189 Main Street Public Works Offices Entrance Parking Lot Senior Center Area Rest Rooms • 411 1/28/00 • RD/Public Works /Senior Center Map • STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM V C Jeff Smyser February 9, 2000 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Bluebill Ponds Preliminary Plat This item is continued from the last P & Z meeting. The preliminary plat design has not been finalized. RECOMMENDATION This item should be continued to the March meeting. • • • • AGENDA ITEM V. D. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: February 9, 2000 TOPIC: Tom & Roxanne Traver, 6750 West Shadow Lake Road, Variance DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: This case involves a variance request to allow construction of a single family home at 6750 West Shadow Lake Drive within 100' of the Ordinary High Water Level (OHW) of Reshanau Lake. The property is Zoned Rural but considered a pre- existing non- conforming lot of recorded as it was platted in 1982 prior to adoption of the 10 acre minimum requirement for rural lots and adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance. The applicant has agreed to construct the house at the 30' front setback line. The proposed setbacks are as follows: Front Setback Side Setback OHW Setback 30' (30' required) 20' (10' required for house, 5' for garage) 73' - 84'(100' required per Shoreland Ordinance on Recreational Development Lakes, unsewered) A variance of 16' - 27' from the OHW is requested. The Zoning Ordinance and the Shoreland Ordinance allow construction on nonconforming lots of record and a variance procedure. According to the Ordinance "in evaluating the variance, the City Council shall consider sewage treatment and water supply capabilities... ". The DNR must be notified of any hearings. Staff has received a recommendation from Tom Hovey, DNR Area Hydrologist concerning this request. His comments are attached and indicate that he "would not object to the granting of a variance if the lake setback is maximized and a condition involving vegetation is placed on the variance". He has recommended that the shore impact zone be maintained or established in native, unmowed vegetation. The Environmental Board reviewed the request and concurred with his recommendation but suggested an unmowed area of 40' from the OHW. They also suggested the applicant work with the Environmental Specialist on modifications to the septic system that would include a pretreatment system. We believe the variance criteria can be met in review of this case. There is a hardship, not created by the property owner; the hardship is not economic; the property is unique as it was created prior to the adoption of the 10 acre minimum requirement in the Zoning Ordinance and the Shoreland Ordinance. There is 145' from the front property line to the OHW level. A 30' front setback and a 100' OHW setback would leave only 15' to build in thus making the property unusable. The balance of Reshanau Lake properties maintain a similar setback to that requested. The variance criteria are as follows: Findings of Fact. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations along and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. In summary, staff would recommend approval of the variance as requested with the following conditions: 1. The home is construct at the 30' front setback line with a varied lake setback of 71' to 84'. 2. A revised survey document is provided for building permit purposes. 3. Maintain 40' in native unmowed vegetation in the shore impact zone. OPTIONS: 1. Approve variance as requested with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • GEORGE G" WATCH LAKE CENTERVILLE SHER —COE •I {'3 iet i R0i�OC70�j:qb m° ��y u b "I° o aa oazatyimeng ACS o' o �� _ft , Q l__J mannnnnenO1000 ��OA I o i n .. �°ti YQG�OCi d40 aoaa� 1, >, pi a,'Ga� MI Die OQLadlCCaa/v\ wziaM Svoa� w Af C.14 1 . to /../i 9..< ..... I .1) :■• '' ...it .0 0 r / ., rs, (4 • .!1, , i; 1 " %. 4('2) gr (3) 4° _,... •-..--,....* /41 Atet). N - ... .r . P.' s / ./....A 4..C.O.Ier.4.4er '.3 3 • 711. ,.* , iiii I , • , ' .r l' ore ( ? 52), 4. ,... 74,,O*1 itt " . 1,V . Ali / • SI., 0 14040 .. ..... • .--..14. ft ;.-- -', ii.....,..'t k .:-..•-•• h 00 st 0 k 4 al 0 A .?`t / N i' "r.-0,■:,,,, / - *,S° 75) 4:yiri ... , .' ..r / / • • • • • • 4 \,' . .. *.• /(112ef . . -e ■ .9.23 C.4 t6 • • • Environmental Board Recommendations January 26, 2000 Memo To Mary Kay Wyland From Marty Asleson Date: 01/27/00 Re Recommendations of the January 26 Environmental Board The Following recommendations were made at the January 26, 2000 Environmental Board Meeting: 1. Review of Lot 3, Blk 1 Reshanau Shores The Environmental Board recommended approval of the variance for house set -back from the OHW; That staff review the septic system; That the provisions of the shore impact zone conceming the preservation of native vegetation in the shore impact zone be addressed and includes a recognition that a 40 foot strip of vegetation from the ordinary high water level be preserved with native vegetation. Motion By J.P. Touchiness Second By Scott Canyon Motion approved. • Page 1 SENT BY: DNR METRO; January 26, 2000 1 -26- 0 5:04PM; 6127727573 => 651 982 2499; #1/1 Minnesota Dcpart.mcnt. of Natural Resources DNR Waters - Metro Region, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 -6793 Telephone: (651) 772 -7910 Fax: (651) 772 -7977 Ms. Mary Kay Wyland City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 RE: SETBACK VARIANCE, LOT 3, BLOCK 1, R.ESHANAU SHORES, CITY OF I .INO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY Dear Ms. Wyland: 1 have reviewed thc above referenced proposal and have the following comments. It is the preference of the Department that setbacks are maximized for all new construction. It doesn't appear that lake setbacks have been maximized on this proposal. The two adjustments that seem most obvious are moving the deck to the side of the house and further reducing the street setback. It is difficult to compare the setbacks of the proposed structure with the existing structure on the lot to the north (Lot 2), as the structure to the north is measured to the survey line, which is not a reliable indicator of thc location of the ordinary high water mark (elevation 883.5'). 1 would not object to the granting of a variance if the lake setback is maximized and a condition involving vegetation is placed on the variance. The shore impact zone (SIZ) should be maintained or established in native, unmowed vegetation. The SIZ is that area adjacent to the lake equal to half of the required setback, or 50' in this case. This alone will help mitigate the negative effects of the shorter setback by providing a more stabile lake edge than mowed lawn (physically and biologically) and will help protect views from the lake. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, fl r -� • Tom Hovey Area Hydrologist 1)NR ln1orma(it n: (151.246 -6157 • 1-888-046 -6367 • TTY: 6 1 296 ,i484 • 1 ••X(O-07- .(0)2x) An Iw;UaI 01111111 F.n+ItlutiT+ l'iinlyd nn I1rryt:4y! I`apa+ C.1011,1111419 n January 26, 2000 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources DNR Waters - Metro Region, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 -6793 Telephone: (651) 772 -7910 Fax: (651) 772 -7977 Ms. Mary Kay Wyland City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 RE: SETBACK VARIANCE, LOT 3, BLOCK 1, RESHANAU SHORES, CITY OF LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY Dear Ms. Wyland: I have reviewed the above referenced proposal and have the following comments. It is the preference of the Department that setbacks are maximized for all new construction. It doesn't appear that lake setbacks have been maximized on this proposal. The two adjustments that seem most obvious are moving the deck to the side of the house and further reducing the street setback. It is difficult to compare the setbacks of the proposed structure with the existing structure on the lot to the north (Lot 2), as the structure to the north is measured to the survey line, which is not a reliable indicator of the location of the ordinary high water mark (elevation 883.5'). I would not object to the granting of a variance if the lake setback is maximized and a condition involving vegetation is placed on the variance. The shore impact zone (SIZ) should be maintained or established in native, unmowed vegetation. The SIZ is that area adjacent to the lake equal to half of the required setback, or 50' in this case. This alone will help mitigate the negative effects of the shorter setback by providing a more stabile lake edge than mowed lawn (physically and biologically) and will help protect views from the lake. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tom Hovey Area Hydrologist DNR Information: 651- 296 -6157 • 1- 888 - 646 -6367 • TTY: 651 - 296 -5484 • 1- 800 - 657 -3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity I Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a •U Minimum of 10% Post - Consumer Waste CTEICTE OF SLiRE'r FOR: McCallum Construction -1- I I I L _ • • / / / / / 1 . 1- 1 1 1 1 L _ • • 1 892.19 891.83 EBIT EBIT 1 1 1 L _ • • 1 / /893.17 EBIT 892.82 / 892.89 / EBIT /EBIT / / / / / / / / / / / (7 / �j \�j✓ 8 0.81 / d0. 4)4) : ti�0((/ i'F �� . 0 • ct- 2 A '1- E 1143 / 47 888.33 HSECOR I I I I L _ • • 1 892.6 EBIT • / 888.84 + 886.5 G• GE 1 ii 886.93 HSECOR 886.01 HSECOR 885.95 HSECOR 886.15 HSECOR + 883.06 GE 6,5•.* / / / / /883. 00 . 5332 Q, , ooh •mac rs:,9' 6' l / �)1\ 9632 .. 890•.1 / / '4 880.29 .. __TRAVPT A80 / 75t \Trop, l:- 884450 ODD / / 893.21 / EBIT / 892. EBIT :t 889.89 GE GE Si /A /ek.- 883.18 I'8 2.51 0007 TOE Fnd:• 0.5" / 4 887.7,9 : GE 892. $6 GE / 9J4 + 884.5T 0 89tsi4 E_T' .891144 // 000e •.. / -Fljd 0.5:1' C.P. + 810.86 /+ 887.27 / Doublef Spi4 in PP . Set, Elev. 893.83..••'• /+ 889.5 / 4 • 91.89/ 1 BIT O. I.P. . : R.L.S. #5332 : ""a°,5- 45>' • 8 :Q • „� '•G f 4.O6 + 884.71 GE + 822.10 QE +'892.48: 891.78 GE -b 890.21 P.LIN� GE •+ 885.51 GE I , . -I- I 1 I I L- • / 1 + 884.51 • 884.52 TOP i 880.06 I.P -1 1 i / E4BAN os ' + 883.34 �i� H.W.L. e 14, 1 882.581+; 882.6 m� GE i . TOE 8,,,.F2 • 1 1 / 88.}•32 j ; 879.25 OC c H2O a . o O -O 879.39 k20 0,,/ 883.48 % H.W.L. TOE * ' 883.80 + ! i 89.59 , 1 GE / 1 -BANIf - • '883.351 + Q`.:C� TOP• GE ` 883.44 1 orb. ▪ / H.W.L1f� I 883.75+ t c 00c GE B83.69/' '..4-...:88 .13 019 h) I TOE • / • • T 0 1� 1 + 86`4.08 // 883 40 1 : GE / H.W.L d 1 879.66 .1 000 J E- BAND, `r I 1 1 L _ • • 1 NOTES' -t +;• 884.02 GE 8TOE 3 T :' +$•OP71 : 883.21+ GE BHWL3 879.58 H2O 03 0 vbO�N (iJ 879.96 10 .. /E -BAI' -1 883.48 TOE / - 2 foot Contour Interval - N.G.V.D. Vertical Datum - Topography Collected in Field by E.G. Rud / & Sons on 09 -24 -1999. - Property Area = 40,600± sq.ft. (0.93± Acres) DIAG: 43.00 x 103.67 = 112.23 BENCHMARK: Top of C.I.M. (Witness Corner) on Lot 1, Block 1. EIev= 881.86 It881.61 0011 879.46 H2O • S #5332 • . /1 /<- Fnd0.5 "I.P. NK 879.49 H2O v 0 cgp kcy J O O ,q3 4, 4- ), 0 0 O *Garage Down 2cs* PROPOSEP ELEVATIONS: GARAGE FLOOR = 893.6 (dn 2cs) TOP OF BLOCK = 895.4 LOWEST FLOOR = 887.3 (12 cs w /o) TOP OF FOOTING = 887.0 LEGEND • . Denotes O Denotes Denotes -GW-> Denotes -OHW- Denotes X1011.2 Denotes Denotes 0892.3) Denotes f' Denotes Denotes Lot 3, Block 1, RESHANAU SHORES, Anoka County, Minnesota. Iron Monument Found Iron Monument Set Utility Pole Guy Wire Overhead Wire Existing Elevation. Existing Contour Proposed Elevation. Direction of Drainage. Wood Hub at 11 foot offset. Scale 1 " =40' Drawn By: ERV Disk: Job No.: 99541 HS 0 Denotes Iron Set • Denotes Iron Found Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Suveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Re istration No. 25344. E. Co_ RUD 4 SONS, INC LAND SURVEYORS 918+9 LEXINGTON AvE• NE CIRCLE PINES,12ENESOTA 55014 -3625 TEL6 -5556 or • • • AGENDA ITEM V E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: February 9, 2000 TOPIC: Site & Building Plan Review: Swimming Beach Buildings, Anoka County Parks BACKGROUND The application from Anoka County Parks is for a site and building plan review for four structures on the west side of Centerville Lake. The buildings represent further development of an existing beach facility area. The site is within the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve (the Park). The Park is zoned PSP Public Semi - Public. Public parks and recreation facilities as well as all public county government buildings are permitted uses in this zoning district. The site is within a shoreland overlay district as well, so shoreland regulations apply. All buildings are well under the 45' maximum height allowed by the zoning ordinance. Because the facilities are within the large Park, the site plan meets the maximum building coverage and minimum green space requirements for the zoning district, which are both 35 %. The shoreland maximum coverage of 60% also is not a problem. The shoreland ordinance classifies Centerville Lake as a recreational development lake and requires a setback of 75' from the ordinary high water level. The ordinary high water level has not been specifically determined for Centerville Lake. However, staff from the MN Dept. of Natural Resources (DNR) notes that the ordinary high water level is stable and is about the same as the shoreline on this lake. The buildings are over 140' from the shoreline at the closest point. Building permit applications will be reviewed by the City Building Inspector. Structures: There are four structures to be built. A gazebo, multi - purpose building, and restroom building will be clustered around a concrete patio area. This cluster will connect to the beach and parking lot with concrete walkways. A picnic shelter will be separate with its own walk to the parking area. The gazebo (see drawing A3, lower center)) will be a 20' x 20' square with a concrete floor and an open roof reaching a height of 13 feet. The support columns will be covered with cedar lap siding. The multi - purpose building (drawing A6) is 20' x 20' with a two -foot roof overhang all around. The pitched roof will have asphalt shingles and will peak at a height of about 14'. Cedar lap siding (horizontal, 1" overlap, 7" exposed) will cover the exterior walls. • • Site Plan Review, Anoka Parks February 9, 2000 page 2 Three walls will include windows. This building will have vending machines on the exterior of the northwest wall. The building will house the lifeguard office and locker room The restroom building (drawing A6) will be approximately 25' x 25' with an additional roof overhang. The overhang on two sides will be about 7' and 2' on the other two sides. Asphalt shingles will cover the pitched roof which will peak at about 15' in height. The north and south sides will feature barrel vaults on the roof with louvres. Cedar siding will cover the exterior walls. The picnic shelter (drawing A7) measures 50' x 50' square. A concrete floor will be covered by a sheltering pitched roof topped by a clerestory structure. A 24' x 30' area will have an overhead trellis extending from one side of the shelter. On another side, the floor slab will extend out to a 6' fire pit surrounded by crushed rock.. The roof will peak at 24' in height and will be covered with asphalt shingles. The support columns will be covered with cedar lap siding. Roads: Access will be via the access road to the Park. off Main St. Utilities: An existing 6" water well on the site will continue to serve site, including the new buildings. The site will connect to Centerville sanitary sewer. We have not seen the utility plans for the sewer connection. A condition of approval should require that the utility plans must be submitted for review by the Lino Lakes City Engineer. Environmental Board Review: The Environmental Board reviewed this project at its January 26 meeting. The Board had no recommendations on the project. Conditions of Approval Staff recommends approval of the site and building plan with the following conditions: 1. Final utility plans shall be submitted for review by and obtain the approval of the Lino Lakes City Engineer. OPTIONS 1. Approve site and building plan as submitted with the conditions listed in this report. 2. Table application and return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • I -35E Z C) 0 I -35E oz°o d Q - Ewo Q O CE s? RVILLE ROAD 0 w >N I..L w LLI me' Nw L.L J a" WLL< cc O z 0z0 LLI =w U� STATE HIGHWAY 49 U 1- > w LL __I J d U coQ 0 >- �w ww W$ O 0 to D CO CO 0< 0 w a_ --I HJ CL LL (, <> 0 LL< OQ w 0 Q tx ix 0 I CC D J Cr a 0- I-- in I- d CO RICE CREEK CHAIN OF LAKES REGIONAL PARK RESERVE CENTERVILLE SWIMMING BEACH BUILDINGS Anoka County, Minnesota SHEET INDEX Al A2 A3 M A5 AB A7 SUE PLAN - WANING INDEX BEACH BUILDING FLOOR PLANS BEACH BUILDING RU. CEILING PLANS AM ROOF PLANS PICNIC SHELTER PLAN LONG AND WALL SECTIONS 13EACH MELDING ELEVATIONS PICNIC SHELTER SECTIOAM AND ELEVATIONS • REST ROOM FOUNDATION 1, FRAMING PLANS S2 NUL II-PURPOSE FOUNDADDN /I, FRAMING PLANS 53 PICNIC SHELTER FOUNDATION k FRAMING PLANS 54 GAZEBO FOUNDATION 1 FRAMING PLANS 1.12 M3 M4 MECHANICAL TITLE SHEET PLUMBING PLAN LAVAL PLAN SCHEDULES AND DEIAJLS IITIgiliTe,ESGRE61.(ANTTRACT. WEE ALTERNATTCS IN PROJECT 4.0*0L) Et ELECTRICAL TITLE SHEET E2 BEACH LDING FLOOR PLANS UGHTING E3 BEACH BUILONG FLOOR PLANS POWER Ea PICNIC SHELTER FLOOR PLANS -LIGHTING AND POWER ES ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES MO RISERS MAC SITFITER WOO MEWS STRUCTURE/ lol010AURPOSE/L1F00JAND IMAMS TOILET WATENG GEI,RAJ. No TES t 0711713 TO FLRISSII RENCNNANNS FOR CONTRACTOR TO ESTFASEN ELEVIIIONS NOM. 1. OWNER TO PROVOE OFFSETS TO LOCATT STRUCTURE: FOR CONTRACTOR. .UMNITALLPAT IfteallgilVirraale% suraltr&Fm-Ds C40TRACTL10S infFERERCE 0007. T. ClX.STRUC1107 ADDESS TO WORK NiEA$ ELL SE ON EXISTNO ROADWAYS. PROJECT TE.AM OWNER, 2giVa.f.411" WEER1 SWANSON 4COMITRUCtION WNW:RI NNEETECI, !UMW POO ASSOCIATES FACISTECTS 7 ERGNEERS 0124 410-11701 UO2, 4174780 30.3-5443 SlkLICTURA, FIDCHER ENOWITTIVNG IOW 210-0613 RECTWACA. 40077217.70140. MUMS° EttuErmia, I. 1670 741-1740 FURNOSINES 407 MCC OR4074C7 (HT 4044.44 ENCOCERSIC 010E0 F4.SE460E0 WE DFCISLATION CCEATUNCATIONS ioo CTIORRI SITE PLAN SCALE- y•-r-o. Rum4Trrl_ WE5D Ei // \ •/ /‘ •/ \:( \A. // - • / / tor WI / /1 . , 2 sr,* TOTS \17.11,‘‘ • :\_/G") .\ / I \\"•\ •:‘ It4sW. ••••Z:t7. / // A • / EL." • •01 ))//1)§ / ): • • '2-4=-44AP-1J .._ • 4641/4- ) . I • ‘Je...:'/ • • 1.0 • • \ /)\,/ C .SIP‘RIICEs , r /'. V • -•••. 114/ •":•"'". Fe: / " • / 0t / PICNIC TADLEcb 12'' ASH PICNIC TABLE / 0,7 • Az"' 41.9‘\ oF, I I < 1 \ BEACH SHOWER Y OWNER 0 • • • 1 , ........ I •-• -- I A-- 10* ASR UCTION LIMIT '6" ASI: 4' MAPLE :• """•,/ 4R,LL / ...J.Tssi • . c..?stR GMRIL , ...• ... .... • 9 /... : (- * ---- -/- - --- —ALT NO 4 _ ..'' / .. CONCRETE . 40 ••••■ GArce0 WORK ONLY - . 1 . .I.,. Z 4V _-J7771 5 A ,Itrfpr , ....., F.F.E. -418'-10' 0.-"'".. .. ---... --. 0 ' ASH NN ''''' . ..... r,s Ri.i......<- crry ? R TO SAt:ilTirlY45 1.4 ... iI' ASH A\ / -8 92.- • ;IL " .1••• , • , : C\40---16/; 8: 0:: —6 ---0 el --E)-- .3.-0- ..I----1(1::tr9.' 615.\ N ....: . \ LI, -.1 `...s'/''s - \ . \ \ s • s ate•--..........woR14204ERNIONG _FO__UNTIAJN_______ ___ ---- 1 / • SEE MECH. tGS _...-- ---.....,........., ‘`,.. STLIB our .51f-Ro ,, /...- %_.--,---4---se•---'s, - •----• -- .......,,,J._ • .'";\ ! • -':-\;,',/ s 1, ,\. ' 7•'s \ 1 ' __-,_4l..-.1......" --.1.---1,19,--Pr.• \ '101LET BUILIAND a- 1154) ..... ..) \ ".1 sii '• DRINKING FOUNTAIN BY G.C. 2' DIA OT MAPLE / • ,,`„ 0 • PICNIC SHE.TEFI 142 F. E. 100'-0 ti c'16' 1 '• I 1, 1 , NOTE: OWNCR HAS COVERED A GENERA! ONTRATOR ' I . I \ , 1 PRIOR 10 START. !I i i PI • / I ! \ 3°13'32"; ; I. 1 1' i! SITES WITH NAY MID WILL REMOVE ,IT REQUEST OF ..— 5° 1648-1---1 i ./. . :' 11 TkUCTION\ .LIMIT C)-°- ..5‘" 2' '7)41 / 1 1 1 \ . ' I 1 \ 1 1 • . \ I ■ RtrOC. \t, I NI iftir: • 1 i„- ! • -1 -.• General Nair's: I 1. 4" concrete sidewalk I I 2. The General Contractor must stay within the noted construction limit. I; I -r 11 • e 1 I I 1! 1-ty 11 I I • ) • • r df‘ rif A 22X 6. Owner to cover all building pads with hay and remove I__ .1 (.) , The General Contractor must restore the site to condition at start of project and dispose for G.C. when required. • which is at this time rough groded. 1 .. \ 8022.3' ,,... .,.. r\ . k Lt Ti",.5r.4.UCE 21 DIA ,y.T2'trAAPLF. EXISTING WELL --• -TO REMAIN__ ----- iii,ATER LINE ----BY OWNER 4'347 1 , I 11 1 11 I 5. G.C. to note there is no landscaping in this contract. ; / • ' 3 1 1 EXISTIN, • 3. The building pads have been prepared by the Owner and ore in place. The only excavating to be done is for footing and foundation and slab on grade. — Rough grade around structures to drain away. All finish grading is by the Owner. 1 ICA 4. G.C. to coorainote installation of utilities (water and sanitary) furnished and . .,'\•) installed by Owner's subcontractors. i l. • TRANS ORMCK <VERIFY EXACT E-OCATION) A5 - Dpg-,p,3 • 1 i /Lc? • • The background for this drawing was furnished by the Owner and represents improvements 1 1 //"! ' I. 1 - 7 -ap , that will be complete prior to start of this construction project. Verify exact field. conditions.' ' I ar- 12/14/99 4111 - ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE re ROOM .1,31 NAME • OM OD 1XZ FLOOR BASE WAL.L CELING HEIGHT CEILING REMARKS PINE C.S. PNE CAA SONO - IX 8 APPLIED HCRIZONT011 Y 100 HULTI-pURPOSE • 101 GAZEBO S118011111E 102 VENOM X13 UNSEX H.G. TOL. '2INJ! 108 HELTER V.C. T. WIN, fr• 0* NMI MVO 8.-0" je T-411 PANTED CONC. WOOD STA WOOD STAN IMES - OPEN DEUS WILNEMINSTAN CONC. 110.SOPIC STNI WILSENO STAN 8-0. 4T-1-o 0,0. Q.T. *TeittE at C.T. 410 AVE 81-011 f1110310if • 41-01 C.T.INIIN171 INENE /MATED BY - -r IT-0^ RI-14E80XX •41-11.1401C.S.11/NXIIT *OK MATED IT IASI- -- Q.T. per tr•Lo. - NO rwitAt 000N Ty-T-11.1EPONY *41.0. ROI C.T. IMMO/ MOE PEECATED BY MAX- f. CI.E. -Wax. PIL at CONG. ROM SIAN 110.921140 STAN VARIES ,1111 VECKTLM O.T. 0.0. 4" NIGH PINE C.S. EPDXY-- 8-0" 1-1-11EPDXY • win Yt tal WNW nos _}472.11.910_1..15,111 DOOR AND OPENING SCHEDULE 00 DETAILS j HARDWARE RcIAARKS a ! 0 0 x xx x X STCR%I SCREEN 845(010 T . 1000 00015)400411 OPERATION )71 XA X X 3A2 ))41-411 )X( 3,63X1X x FRAME TYPE KEY SEE SCKLDILE ,1*----T ii--t Olt 6 ': :1 PISERT , [ t r /*--\ ROLLING GRILLE L91 (7\ H.U. PAINTED PAINT SEE SCHEDME r L., X 8" -- l00JVE01 (7\ HAL_ PAINTED 1"1"."-11.8g 8g ri)H.M. FRAME \-I/PAINT COLOR SCHEDULE MIMI "'LES FC4 r"4" APP14°"4" "W4R? MuLTI-PURPOSE INALOING. GAZEBO. TOILET WONG. PICNIC SHELTER EXTERIOR EXTERIOR METAL AND FLA.SHING - WHITE 0010111(1AD OR EQUAL. PREFINISHED WINDOWS • MATCH 00500 WINDOW WHITE. EXPOSED I80101. HA45N04E Lk/ ORACKETS, WA- SHOES FOR ARCH LAIL REAM ETC3 • PANT TO IAATCH ST94 00000 MUNN SAVPIX). 2.04F:511' MIRRORS OFI 041LE? To \l/ BARS:. 12 WALL TLE TOILET ELEVATION RM. 106 /2 SCALE- 1/."-P-0" ROWS 104 564. 21-0" X 3,6" MIRROR PANTED WOOD 1061 a PERMETER NIRRUR TO FILL CAP ISNR/ 12" X 12" TILE RASE ---- rj. 1-- COSH 001 01 PAPER DISPENSER 0 TOILET ELEVATION ROOM 106 scxx• ROOM 103 t■ 014 VIL 171 MHO) CIPEO SAATARY NAPKIN RECESSED rox_ct 1?-3' PLCEES0 NANO DRYER PAPER / 0. 801801.84(010 INT DISPOSAL DISPENSER C-12" X 12" RECEPTACI E TLL BASE TOILET ACCESSORY & EOUIPmENT TOLE"( ELEVATtON ROOM 103 0 ILip:AmmG HEIGHTS KEY oLIAI TOF & BACKSPLASH PLAN 000R% 4(0 DRAWER --- 18". PAD! CABNET 4" TOE SPACE-- 11 L---- AGA SHEL ra...„ COUNTER ELEVATION 1/442.) SCALE- 141•1,0P Y-10" 1X8 P.C. SONG—, S/4 PINE - --A ,/ / ..- .1.; ,0 , \ .;' • ,:ty.... \?, \ \ muL TI-PuRPosE ss \ \\. \ \ • 14, 0' 5. 5" •/. N \ 1'1': >V1 1 / 1's WALL THICKNESS ger\ TYP. HAL FRAME SCJLE4 3.•?-0" S0,0" SLOPE AWAY 9' ! -11111t• g• • „ 1; d eh 2X6 51100 *Oa 2X8 STUOS (48" ' J- . SION/RIOSX • CY OWNER --01 WATER HTORANT (HOSE MN- 12 X 12 =J 00145 awe, 41ORCELN01 1, 01.0 BACKER BOARD 0€ TM. sou- r-r-o. FACE OF TWO 1'4"1/4" BACK • SIOC SPLASH SET ON TOF PI SLILOrE BEAD CAVIN JT. 84 WALL 4110090.0Arrtop S01.0.) S&06- 0000 RATER/AL WITH BEVELED EDGE I i COVERED Temp P.L. C11 flAiTtc 1,Arlorra 1 SUPPORT BRACE. I."' 2; ()CATE BETWEEN SINKS. --... -- Pl.. COVERED PPE --BLOGIONC IN WALL I • SUPPORI • COVERING rap TOP SUPPORT , I 100/0,0 TO NUN C081TIN4J01Z 1fr 1 ALONG 0007") - 0(1000051.0 - 00000 LNE • • (7)VANITY SECTION SULE. 104-0" ‚35- 0. • - CONC. Ar-k • r-± MINING 1,101INTAIN 44, C.C. 1 / 00.2014NA1T NO. (r 3/C) ) :211 \ /7( \ „, / •13/ / / / / 4 L CONC. STOOP 1/4 1 ROOF OVERHANG 1N3OVE-44 r Tr/. 1 .-'----'ggiEHDO FM50 osa .orwo. TOILET BUILDING /2.L.p2.4. • 4.1 5•' rt- ,WEL1. TANX HEATER ORNN PIT 11. 5(0 8/0.5 NT , : 01_290_,..:id [FIN. PLR RA 105 CONC TH 258 WALLS SLOPE WAY 1-TEL Tit SLO —CONC. ■• STOOP-1--, • 1(5 SY WVER D •.,. CONTROL JOINTS 0,/ \ TYP.- \,. • Y \ \ • I •STRAL__ 1 • / . , 2.-5" 0 0 0 4 0 KEYED NOTES, 4" CONCRETE 50.88 558 10/10 1.10511 NO0-00.0 TROWEL 014004. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO '602E./C.1 ELECTRIC*. CDNDLAT TYPICAL. ROBE HOOKS T/LE WAPESCOT (SEE ROOM FINISH SCHEME) ROUGH IN WASTE & WATER FOR BASE BD. BEACH BUILDING FLOOR PLANS --2 X 4 TREATED PLATE -30" ANCMOR BOLTS OSB SHEATHING ----15* FELT —CED.Or SONG TYPICAL COLUMN DETAIL PLAN GAZEBO TRELLIS STRUCTURE 1/4S,1 scm.E. 11/2,11-0" MEE ALSO 6/A5 FOR TYPICAL SECTION NO TRW SCALE- 1/4,-0-0" CCIJ0410004JNO(, 8084705 erNcH SECTION la/ SCALE- T,T•EP %WALL smicoess 0 CORNER DETAIL SCALE- r-T-De • / SEE 6/43 FOR ADM 104 . MUTES A3 OMULTI - PURPOSE BUILDING ROOF PLAN SCALE. 1/4" -TNT' x \I V n'.\\ ,. / X 16" £LOPEO\, / / ' U•LM7 i /. • \f/ 7 ,644 -11 SJF'Fl� STAXST -1D _. WALL 1,13MTE0 LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTED ON COLUMN FACE — - -- 4" X 12" SLOPE (CEDAR/ \ ` -4" ' 12" BOTTOM L, / 4 n 12 • (CEDAR/ rvp. . (OP OF CEDAR (STAINED! ALL HARDWARE RAWER/ 10 MATCH SAN COLOR TOP VIEW • GAZEBO TRELLIS STRUCTURE ROOF PLAN (STAINED) A3 SCALE- %; •r-D" 1414 ST AN()NU SEAT: WHITE NLUM!NTW DRIP EDGE-. K _ r--2" HEN STANDING SEAM PIECE `Ol` ASPHAL T S1WGt ES D'fER DRIP EDGE 4,'r" COX PLYWOOD OVER it" 06046HIW - --A COX PLYWOOD SNEATIW4G v(7 COLORKLAD CAP u SCALE- r(; -r•0" CONTINUOUS N" PREFN!S/ED MCI AL VENT STRIP - / DASHED LINE REPRESENTS 1X3 PAINTED 0641 764,1 - -6' -C" 1-5-6 SOFTY STAINED /,> 6L -0" 1.1-11 CELNG STAY 4E0 - 00NTNLYWS 6" PREFNISHED NET& VENT 5TR'P AM MULTI- PURPOSE BUH.OING REFLECTED CEILING PLAN KW SCALE- '/f•r -O' 0. ANGLE ANO41900 TO COL. SUM WALL F. BY 11 DLU -LAM SUPPLER \\ \.. PROFILE WHITE COL0R61-AO ONLY 4 4 GLU -LAMS 6564 SLOPED CLU -LAIR O DETA, SCALE- f/1"•r -O' MOUNTED LIGHT FIATIRE MOUNTED 04 COLUMN FACE. —6" 41DES1CPED CLII -I AYE 9E NIS 33 16" Z *EP -TOP • 13';• " L r "y<fHEM. OF GLU•LNA / • ••-0• A.F.F. PLYWOOD (1•DERS!UF. STNNEED - -464(0 CO5.0901 D CAP FLASHING • COLUMN TOPS TYP. GAZEBO STRUCTURE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN (STANED) Al SCALE- '/" -F0" __.. (21 LAYERS 1:" P.TWD, ICE 45v WATER SHIELD, SIN. ANC E BY 7'.ORKLA) GAP SYG -.A14 ._ SUPPLER - - -•— -16" DEEP GL9-LAM YP. '•4P SECTION 9Y CLU -1 AM SUPPLIER -- PAINT 44'105. HARDWARE .ANGLE TO MATCH S165N NFU -4 X 12 COLUMN f - J --- -1 I riN GAZEBO STRUCTURE PROFILE (STAINED) u SCALE. 1/4 "4-0" - W.'LL;. MOUNTED 11:#11 ! FIXTURE M(1UNTED ON COLUMN FACE IIT T1 1 a �- 11TTi i L1111111111111111 1 1 [HILL I i i( d ;If, d i q ._Ll- il _I 166BB,,t PANT l .1.1 C -I- 1 1 7 1 _ I 1l.. r 1 N _r; i � 1,1... L.� f 1.�- 1 L�' MMIT. r--I-I `- -- EXPOSED TO DECK 1 I a,__1. I Cif-- ijii w I ' 1 ' 1 _ 1� 1 111 �� .�. ID I I 'IBS 1 _'r s > I 1 D� J , Ii I T [I O uRESTROOM BUILDING REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SCALE- %; -r.O- 1YP. ROOF EDGE ITT Ii i ! 100044014(1 / \ 1' S1ANOw0 SEAM CURVED P40E1E411E0 METAL ROOF (1' -0" 0.0.1 OVER 6050 VETEI ON ICE AND WATER 4(4EL0, I /=' PLYWOOD, NANO FRAMING. 12'-0" 4, -C" I TYP. I "U T ASPHALT SHINGLES TYP - -J COLOP0LAD STANDING SEAM 1.-0" 0.0. ROOF PEAK QREST ROOM BUILDING ROOF PLAN A3 SCALE. 'k'-T-O•' NOTE WRAP ALE. PLUMING VENT STACKS N COIORK!.AO TYPICAL. • 1 X4 SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (11008. - 6'• )' 1 -1 -11 SOFFIT S7Ak1E0 CONTINUDI l5 6" P5E01454E0 1101AI_ VE111 STRIP 1X 3 PAINTED • PERIMETER (SHOWN DASHED/ -- WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 440.ENTED UN COLUMN FACE 12 5 NITER CORNE V __ ��_ J!i ----___ ,... ,, ir--,, ., , , ,, 1, ,, I ! / '‘. I 11 :IA — — — - — --- -- -- - K---tJ- ' ; - — ____ ._. CI pc.t. V 0% TRW APPLIED BASE SRA 70 COLUMNS --206 TRIM t _FOUNDATION SHOWN DASHED NORTH WEST ELEVATION - muL TI-PuRPOSE lA.V SCALE. 1/4.-0-0. —ASPHALT SHNGL ES TY P. 641 8116 DOOR FRAME -- IATER CORNERS CEDAR COLORKL METAL CAP iit1S0&: 70 aik.6,,euv" M.oLORKLAD FASCIA — WHCTE ETMOING SEAN ON BARREL VttlLT ; rm:-T..iall. ----___ ,... ,, ir--,, ., , , ,, 1, ,, I , ‘, 11 .. I. CI V 1 --4_ _LL FOISI4147108 SHOWN DASHED • I i SOUTH EAST ELEVATION - MULTI-PURPOSE SCALE. 1/4".,-0" T, -1-11 ON SOFFITS TYP ,{ 1 I ■ I I I I 11----- FOUN0A1 ION SHOWN DAWED----------------1 1 I 11 ii. —1-1 Ll • —• r'S'N SOUTH WEST ELEVATION - MuL Ti-PuRPOSE %.4.,/6 SCALE. 1/4.1-0" KICKV-ATE -KILKPLATE 8 1. VER 2J0008 YP --PNN'tED HM now ir FRAME W EE SCRN FOUNDATION 46OWN DASHM n\ NORTH ELEVATION - REST ROOM SCALE. 1/4.1,0" COLORKIAD a VENT 5r.2 - COLOR2O AD META- CM' -2010 CEDAR FASCIA WATER SHIELD UP 6 -0"' 206 C.KOIR 0 - JAMB TYP. r608015 HAI DOOR Fr FRAME ; / ■---...r K$ CM AT E I I i F OUNDATIN SHOWN OAS+ r ---1-1 1-L1_--4" -r-- I C) WEST ELEVATION • REST ROOM SCALE- '/.-V -V ----•-••- -_•— AWAY ASPHALT smaes TYP, r —T .Thio 101 KICKPLATE --IPAIN TED 1-61 DOOR & 680046 7 ri2urox.rx.m.4 SHOWED 3HE0 --t7- DASHED LINE INDICATES (INC. STOOP ENTRANCE DOORS ierN SOUTH ELEVATION - REST ROOM SCALE- 1/4•1,0" LIOrf T-- LT Tj- h 1 1 ON SOFFITS rep:— CEDAR SCAM; --7" EXPOSURE 0L 110+ AWAY X IV (-1)0 PL26000 PANTED. • 5ACKIN3 FOR OWNER 80FOR E0 ,..Nr_,,BLILLET P4 281 DOOR * FRAME 644,110 ,-KICKPLATE soiumsEfn.7 1 00140 I I I i I FOUNDAHON SHOWN DALIED J_ r O EAST ELEVATION - REST ROOM sc&E- Ve-V-V INTER CORNERS -- GRADE 1 0 6 ROUGH coo 516180 EVERY 0114R CelArat: F OUNDATIT , YIN I) sHED .fer) NORTH EAST ELEvAT;ON - MuL Ti-PURPOSE V.,../8 SCALE.. W.I.-Er x v (ED* STR)1 PARTIAL SECTION 5081- re-?-0" 020 15. FELT 34" 0182 MOTH OF SONG 10 8 RDOCH SAWN CEDAR NOVEHENT TYPiCAL WAINSCOT STRIPE DETAIL 61,8.1 5081 — APPLIED 2 X 6 BASE 08 TO C01 g. / LL 12/14/99 aci 9943 A6 12 (73) T1• g'• IT-B.' I —1 YP. WHITE CULORKLAD CAP 0 ----- -•- NORTH ELEVATION - PICNIC SHELTER (STAINED TYPICAL) sCAU:• 0 2 0 E:22. 4 ) SOUTH ELEVATION - PICNIC SHELTER t,./7 SCALE, Ye.4-417. 5 12 ROUTE FOR HZDEN CONOVI 104i LIGHTS ROUTE OOT W000 0100-- AWNALT SHINGLES .20• FELT 2 X 4 1W8 TI-SCR) E. SPRUCE 4000 RECK 514660 WEST ELEVATION - PICNIC SHELTER SCALE. 1-1-11531Fr 51411I15 01:14E:LE3 CO'l%0V El(1:0S1'!" Z. TELT.A. 000 . ASPHALI SHINGLES >0. FELT 14114000 ‘---PK-ANCINEERED ROM Iftusr-cs • 2e CONT. SOFFIT VENT MA T-1-11 SOFFIT VENT T-1-11 SOFFIT 2.-C" (D EAST ELEVATION - PICNIC SHELTER SCALE. W1'-O' 14/8640 A.L. PANTED T-1-11 13E501412 SHOW/1 DASI.E0 44— ROSLRIEIZERS (if-, CLERESTORY OPENINGS C SHELTER fl i SCALE. N.-5-0" 3.-0" —4 X 12 4.5,06064 yajfi..c3,,z,..AD 3yX4:234 " 0 TRELLIS END A? SCALE- 0-7-15 1- --------- LiGur FIXTURE - .AINT ALL HARDWARE / 1)4 STRUCTURE TO j PATCH STAIN TTP. 6 2 2 7 \I ----ti........_„ I ' . 1 AT IMPOSED LOCATIONS -1-- PANTED IATL SHOE BT STRUCT. r.4-----H WI). SUPPLIER—, CONC WALK I ti.4c4T PER FT. (SEE PLAID „ . . . • . PEIAMETER I YPICAL 0360. SLAB T11 ROD SYSTEU 644006 FINISH 7114.-7 SLOPE 4 '5 ROUGH SAWN CEDAR WALL Cie PCNIC SHELTER 3— ---- RECEPTACLES t f4111KITA t —4) x Ram SAWN ..±.../ 01064 WALL CAP v-ozr SLOPE 4(0(11 16010 SEE 01E0. SAND CUSHION r's \ BUILDING SECTION - PICNIC SHELTER (STAINED) WALE. WAF-0. s..-111106ENE0 SAN • :MMHG COUNTER 12/14/99 A7