Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04/12/2000 P&Z Packet
• • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, April 12, 2000 6:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 8, 2000 III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: IV. OPEN MIKE: V. ACTION ITEMS: A. David Pearson, 6280 Ware Road, Variance B. Lyndal Nelson, 87 Lilac Street, Variance C. Rick Carlson, 62' Street, Minor Subdivision D. PUBLIC HEARING, SSR & W Development, 7920 Lake Drive, Rezone and Minor Subdivision E. PUBLIC HEARING, Lino Lakes State Bank, Otter Lake Drive & New Service Road, Conditional Use, Site Plan Review, Minor Subdivision F. PUBLIC HEARING, Dairy Queen, Northern Lights Blvd., Conditional Use and Site Plan Review G. PUBLIC HEARING, Town Center Development Standards VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. DNR Smart Growth Greenways Planning B. Bluebill Ponds, Preliminary Plat VII. ADJOURNMENT • • Planning & Zoning Board March 8, 2000 Page 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : March 8, 20 TIME STARTED 6:30 P.M.' TIME ENDED 8:15 P. MEMBERS PRESENT : Johns Lane MEMBERS ABSENT Zych STAFF PRESENT City Planner, myser; an I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning ng Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., March 8, 2000. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Feb y ' ; XI 00 Ms. Lane made a MOTION to a • e nutes of the February 9, 2000, meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning & Z , and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared open mike open at 6:32 p.m. No one was present for open mike. Mr. Johnson moved to close open mike at 6:32 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 6 -0. Planning & Zoning Board March 8, 2000 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING: Bluebill Ponds, Main Street, Preliminary Plat Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 6:33 p.m. Staff advised that the applicant, Heritage Development, has submitted an application for a preliminary plat. The site is on the south side of Main Street across from Wood Duck Trail and Bluebill Lane. The original application came before the Planning & Zoning Board in October of 1999 and has been continued since then for various design reasons. It was noted that the City received the revised plat application on December 13, 1999 and State Statutes allow 120 days for the City to make a decision on a preliminary plat application. In order for the City Council to meet this statutory deadline, the Council must act at its March 27, 2000 meeting. Staff presented the preliminary plat as submitted for Bluebill Ponds to create 77 single family lots on a 35.35 acre site for a gross density of 2.18 units per acre. The site is completely within the existing MUSA. The site has ' rrent land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan of SF Residential, and a desi :i� :� of Low Density Sewered Residential in the 1998 draft of the Comprehen Plan e current zoning of the property is R -1 SF Residential. Staff presented information about the lots �;,�� . `' of the preliminary plat, parks and trails, stormwater management and w d utilities. Staff reported that the major transportation issue at this time is n Street (CSAH 14). The City and Anoka County recently completed an acc : n ment study. Wood Duck Trail is the designated location for a full n ection. Bluebill Lane will be a limited access intersection. This means th lueb _ will be a right - in/right -out only intersection. In addition, the City should be loo ng to provide circulation in the area. Ultimately there will be 150+ dwelling units in Highland Meadows West, and 70+ dwelling units in Bluebill Ponds. A full access intersection on Main Street is the appropriate connection, and Wood Duck Trail is the appropriate location for it. Staff explained the problem with the Main Street access is that the extension of Wood Duck Trail south of Main Street would cross the property of the House of Praise Church. The developer and the church are negotiating a land trade that would allow the Wood Duck extension. The church would best be served with a full intersection rather than partial access to Main Street. The developer would have better access for the new development. It will be safer for churchgoers to have an access on the new extended Wood Duck Trail than to access Main Street directly. The City will benefit from the improved safety because of the better access management, and from improved circulation in that area of the City. The goal is a result that benefits the developer, the church, and the City. • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 8, 2000 Page 3 As proposed, the Bluebill Ponds plat is designed to have Bluebill Lane as its immediate access. A Wood Duck access could be created in the future. City staff believes the present proposal should be redesigned after the negotiations with the church are settled. The redesign should address the public safety concerns of access to Main Street and create the Wood Duck intersection. The landowners also have submitted a petition for public street improvements, which would include road access to Main Street. This petition will require a decision by the City as to whether the City will undertake an eminent domain action to take property from the House of Praise Church for the Wood Duck Trail extension. Mar Don Acres is immediately south of the Bluebill Ponds site. Following the first review of Bluebill Ponds by Planning and Zoning in October 1999, several residents of Mar Don Acres informed the City that they wanted the road built along the south border of Bluebill Ponds. Staff held a neighborhood meeting on November 9,1999 to discuss this issue. Residents along the alignment of the desired road were invited, including those in Mar Don Acres, Sherwood Green, and unplatted properties to the north. Based on this meeting and follow -up calls to residents who were not at the meeting, staff found that six of eight property owners in Mar Don Acres wanted t oad. Staff directed the developer to include a road on the plat. It was noted the Environmental Board consid 29 and recommended a 50 foot buffer aro infiltration and overland runoff design wh into the design, use of native vegetati a topsoil. original application on September d the st on the east edge of the site, e, open spaces to be incorporated r around wetlands, and deep tilling of Staff recommends the public plat and supply additional i However, this would require period. If such an extension is no plat as submitted. ntinued to allow the applicant to redesign the to address the issues discussed in staff's report. ment from the applicant to continue the plat review granted, staff recommends denial of the preliminary Chair Schaps asked the applicant if he understood the situation and if he was amenable to an extension. Tom VonBische, the developer, stated he understood there were problems with the plat and he understood that this probably cannot get past the City Council if this item goes forward. However, he pointed out that the Planning Commission had not been presented all of the information about the development, and that they had been presented only facts. Chair Schaps told Mr. VonBische that a lot had to be done to this plat before it can be approved and the standard procedure in this circumstance is to grant an extension on the project, otherwise there could be a recommendation of denial given to the City Council. Planning & Zoning Board March 8, 2000 Page 4 Mr. VonBische stated he would be willing to accept an extension on the application. He noted that he came to the property because of an individual who stated they wanted to sell, and there were 13 people who were selling this particular piece of property. Dorothy Kvitek , one of the individuals selling the property, said she would never leave the property as she had lived there all of her life, and she intends to remain there for the rest of her life. Mr. VonBische said he used to believe that families got along, that churches only wanted to do the right thing, that cities do the right thing for the residents, and that neighbors generally get along with one another. He commented that he does not believe these things any more. Mr. VonBische reported the House of Praise Church is being asked to split its parcel in half, right in the middle of the property. However, the Church believes it is going to expand, and the only way to do this is to acquire land. He reported the Church has two beliefs —one is that it is fine where it is for now, and the other is that it believes someone should expand the property for them. Mr. VonBische stated the City has told him that he is not in compliance with the County's plan. One alternative that the County has i e plan is that Main Street should have an alternate connection to I -35W in this area. onBische asked why this statement in the County's plan was ignored, bu gssu th Wood Duck Trail was not ignored. Mr. VonBische went on to say that at the developer should give them a road, a,,ha anything to the developer. Mr. Vo the plat. od meeting, the neighbors said the would subdivide the land and not pay d these concerns have been addressed on Mr. VonBische pointed out operty is guided and zoned R -1, it is in the MUSA, and he has done everything to accommodate the Church, the neighbors, and the City. He said his company will go to great lengths to prove they have the right to develop the site. He noted the Rice Creek Watershed District even thanked him for doing a project that increased and improved the water quality of the area, and the plat meets the Watershed Districts requirments. He said the Watershed District verbally approved the project at his meeting with them yesterday. He said the critical issue is the negotiations with the Church. He said the Church's request would make the property worth $150,000 per acre, and he was not able to pay that. He had determined the land to be worth about $28,000 per acre, and he offered the Church more than that, but the Church said it did not want that. Therefore, the Church would end up with a road down the middle of its property. Mr. VonBische distributed and referred to pictures of the Church, noting that one can see that it was first a ballroom, then a bar, and then a church. He said the building currently can not meet the applicable code requirements, and it could not meet any code requirements in the future if it were to expand. • so • • Planning & Zoning Board March 8, 2000 Page 5 Mr. VonBische explained that he believed the City had five choices. The first choice would be to approve the plat and get an extension when the Church makes a decision. The second choice would be to approve the plat and the City could use it's power of eminent domain to acquire the Church property. The third choice would be to approve the plat with an alternate entrance. The fourth choice would be a denial of the plat. The fifth choice would be to table the item and continue negotiations. He explained that he just wanted fairness as he has done everything he can do within reason to meet the requirements of the plat. The burden now was with the City to determine if a road is really worth it. Chair Schaps responded by telling Mr. VonBische that it sounded like he was asking the City to do what he is supposed to do as a developer, and that it was easy for Mr. VonBische to tell the City to use the power of eminent domain to acquire Church property. The City has told Mr. VonBische exactly what it needs, but Mr. VonBische cannot get the deal done. Mr. VonBische said the City would be denying a landowner the right to access a County road, and the right to develop his property. He note City can get the road in the future if it wants, it just needs to plan for it. He s as willing to build the road and pay for it. If the Church does not want to make s dea �s t is the way it is, and the City should use the power of eminent domain to a � e property. Chair Schaps reiterated it is not the City's hat the developer cannot do. He suggested that Mr. VonBische do wh t o get the deal done as it is his business. The City's job is to make sure the meets all of the ordinances. He commented the City has been de .�: _ th � is item for six months now and the project has gone nowhere, even thou or changes have been made. Mr. Corson stated he could sy e with the developer, but agreed that it is not in the City's interest to condemn Church property. He asked if Bluebill Lane was considered as an alternate for a major intersection. Mr. Powell responded and said Bluebill Lane is not a four -way intersection, and the median will make it a right -in, right -out. The rationale for not considering it as an alternate for a major intersection is the spacing between 4th Avenue and Lake Drive and that Wood Duck Trail serves a larger area. Mr. Corson questioned why a Wood Duck Trail shift would not work. Mr. Powell stated Wood Duck Trail is a future signalized intersection, and a shift in the south leg would not work. Mr. Corson stated his agreement with Chair Schaps , and said it was not in the City's best • interest to condemn Church property. Planning & Zoning Board March 8, 2000 Page 6 Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:22 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Smyser clarified that if the Planning Commission chose to table the item, it would need an agreement from the developer to do so. If the Planning Commission chose to send the item on to the City Council, it needed to make a recommendation. Mr. Johnson asked how long it would be before the applicant could bring back another proprosal if the item was denied. Mr. Smyser stated the City did not have a one year restriction on this application, but the City Council could waive any waiting period if they choose, and the applicant could then reapply if the issues and problems had been addressed, and it would require a new application fee. Mr. Rafferty asked what the application fee is for this application. Mr Smyser reported the City charges $650 for the ap to cover staff time, and this is sometimes inadequ working on this item since October, 1999. ation. He explained the fee goes reported that staff had been • Mr. Rafferty asked the developer how the oti s worked with the other 12 property 0 owners if Dorothy Kvitek would not sell Mr. VonBische said the 13 propert struck an agreement with the trust Mr. VonBische said he has to would sell. not like each other, and Dorothy Kvitek reduction so she could stay on the property. vitek that she could live on the property if she Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to able the Preliminary Plat for Bluebill Ponds for 60 days conditional upon the applicant being in agreement with the extension. If the applicant was not agreeable to the extension, Mr. Johnson would move to deny the application, and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. The developer stated he was in agreement to the extension so the item was tabled for 60 days. • Planning & Zoning Board March 8, 2000 Page 7 • VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS • • A. Town Center Guidelines Mr. Smyser clarified for the public that the City is in the process of designing a new zoning district for the Town Center area. The City has contracted with Calthorpe and Associates to prepare a master plan with a new urbanism element that will accomplish and old town -Main Street effect. The City has a draft plan, and has held discussions on parts of the plan at different times. He explained that staff will pull together changes based on these discussions with the consultant and a public hearing will be held on the draft on April 12, 2000. Mr. Smyser presented the last part of the draft of the Town Center standards, noting the need for staff input regarding lighting, street furniture, etc. He suggested the Planning & Zoning Board review past discussions, questions, clarifications; hold a general discussion on signage; and discuss Chapters and 5 and 6. He explained that the past discussion left off with the residential portion of the standards, and arized that discussion. Mr. Schilling asked if dormers would be accept 'e in th - sidential areas. Mr. Smyser explained that dormers could issue further. tent work and staff will explore this Mr. Smyser went on to thoroughly ublic improvement standards, and talked about street design. He explained ' tir for allowable street sections. Mr. Corson asked if the stri hown on the commercial street sections on page 60 of the draft would be maintain n association. Mr. Smyser explained the strip of grass would be part of the stree right -of -way and the details of the maintenance need to be worked out. He envisioned it would be the City'job to maintain the strip. Mr. Corson said that details of the maintenance of the strip should be included in the draft. Mr. Powell commented that the strip may not be vegetation, but could be built of brick or similar material in front of the stores. Therefore, the store owners could take more ownership for this area. Mr. Smyser explained the lighting, furniture, traffic calming devices, street trees, street light standards and gateway features that were listed in the draft. He also explained the Open Space District standards and the Public Infrastructure section of the draft. Planning & Zoning Board March 8, 2000 Page 8 Mr. Rafferty commented that tree grates sometimes become weed beds, and the low luster paint on the grates could become chipped and scratched. He had a concern about those items, and even though they can be wonderful protection for the trees, the grates can become full of weeds and you do not see people taking care of the weeds very often. Mr. Corson noted that trash tends to accumulate in the swales, and when water flows through the swales the trash sticks in certain areas. This could become a maintenance problem. Mr. Smyser reiterated that maintenance will require more attention in the draft. He said he would look at these issues further. Mr. Rafferty noted his thanks for the beautification efforts in the draft, but said he is concerned about the long -term maintenance of these efforts. Mr. Smyser said he would make an effort to come up with maintenance data for the Commission to review that would include information on maintenance costs. Mr. Powell noted that some cities have done these i f street scapes, and this information may already be assembled somewh Mr. Johnson asked if the City should conc + trate inimizing the noise for the homeowners who live along the freeway, d affect their property values. He suggested looking at enhancing the 1 ca in these areas. Ms. Lane questioned if the City sh a all of the same trees on one street. She commented that if these trees �� •�, aced, all of the trees on one street could potentially be lost. She sai+ wo >+ like to see a variety of species of trees on the streets. Mr. Smyser said he would look into the tree issue. Chair Schaps suggested the Commission hold a workshop during the last week of March before the public hearing so all of the questions can be worked out. Mr. Smyser reported that he did not expect everything to be all neatly tied up at the time of the public hearing, but the document would incorporate all comments so far, and questions should be answered. He said the Commission could get through the signage portion of the draft at the meeting before the public hearing. Mr. Johnson asked if home occupations need a special attention in the signage chapter of the draft. • • • ■ • • Planning & Zoning Board March 8, 2000 Page 9 Mr. Corson suggested staff look at how to set up an association to handle the maintenance for the area. Unless the City is willing to participate, a board will be needed to handle the maintenance. Mr. Smyser explained that, optimally, the City would not need an association for the commercial areas, but one could possibly be needed in the residential areas. Chair Schaps said the workshop would be held on Tuesday, April 4 at 7:00 a.m. Ms. Lane asked if it was important to hold the public hearing in April. She asked if there was a time frame and if there were people who wanted to develop in the area. Mr. Smyser said he thought the property owners want to develop, and the potential shopping center in Blaine could have an impact on development. Mr. Rafferty asked what would happen if Mr. Tagg had a developer that wanted to develop his land today, and what would happen if these standards do not get adopted. Mr. Smyser commented that the City cannot enfor that he did not think that scenario would happe work with the developer on making the devel VII. ADJOURNMENT thing that is not in place, and di ° sppen, the City would try to meet the new standards. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to ���•h eeting at 8:15 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6- Respectfully Submitted, Lori Thomsen, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • • AGENDA ITEM 5 /t STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE OF MEETING: April 12, 2000 TOPIC: Variance, David Pearson, 6280 Ware Road DESCRIPTION: Mr. David Pearson is requesting a variance to allow a single family home at 6280 Ware Road to be located closer than the required 40' from the property line on a collector roadway. The Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 40'. The applicant has actually redesigned the proposed dwelling to minimize the setback required which will be 30' at the north /west corner and 37.6 at the south/west corner. The variance requested ranges from 2.4' to 10'. The 10' variance applies to the north /east corner of the 6' x 12' bedroom area extension as shown on the plan and is then reduced to 2.4' per the attached survey. This particular lot is the only vacant lot in the Pine Ridge 3' Addition. The parcel contains a very large wetland /drainage easement constricting the buildability of the lot. The proposed dwelling is a walk -out with some steep grades on the north/east corner of the building. For P & Z and Council information, the Pine Ridge additions contain restrictive covenants, not imposed by the City, which require all homes to be within a specified value range. According to the builder /owner, this home, at this size, falls within the value range required but a smaller dwelling, meeting the setback requirement would not. Aside from the value question Staff believes a hardship to the land exists due to the wetland configuration on the lot. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3 That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 3. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 4. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Staff would recommend approval of this Variance as requested. OPTIONS: 1. Approve variance as requested. 2. Return to staff for further consideration 3.Deny requested variance. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • • 0. 6fw LAKE RESHANAU LAKE • soft 5722 7 2p — 4µG 0105 ■ ■ U 23 24 22 21 20 If la 11 33 52 51 50 f rziaQul � _ I2I�&21�21�62���0•°�a���'��ia� lla�%S • 3 2 ' I ; •i Yaifaa2'i'iY. !YY2 12 ro al 1NERlb6E ;� xinarnown: ��00i pt,.._ allll�p`k mmya�MIo MI6 41101 ��Tn, szzlrit 0 a.f1„� ovE iP�p�,E pp2�� 7�QIli3155 33 8 10 0. ” 107 13 14 a 4 15 1;-2�0 IB 1 1 114; 21 17 I 1 AI CORPORATE LI!MI S OF CITY OF LINO LAKES coL$fl S2At[%I10- pOp2At —NO ,32_ — — — — COUNTV- 50511J --- REVISED JAN. 1987 REV. MAY 1988 REV. AUG. 1989 REV. FEB. 1991 REVISED REV. REV. REV. NOV. 1994 JAN. 1996 JULY 1997 JULY 1998 SHADED AREA DENOTES PARK LOCATION /" 1 T 1 r° Ware Road N00'00'00 "E Certificate of Survey for Pearson Construction S89'27'33 "E 10 1110.00 Wetland M I) N —30.0 40' Setback Ling ,% Wetland oo. AB M„ 00,00.00N 37.60- 10 30 Setback S89'27'18 "E 118.50 0 rn Coyote Trail Property Description Lot 1, Block 1, PINERIDGE 3RD ADDITION Lino Lakes, MN Mattke Surveying & Engineering, Inc. 7671 Central Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 (612) 783 -0300 Scale: 1"=50' Basis of Bearings is assumed, • Denotes Iron Monument Found o Denotes Wood Loth Set ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set Proposed Garage Floor = 907.50 Proposed Lowest Floor ■ 899.82 Proposed Top of Footing - 899.49 I hereby certify that this , survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ) Tedd W. Mattke, RLS Date: 3//0/00 Minn. Reg. No. 15612 • -- pDO � J G .9 I_ .. 404 e AA" 1 Z -voo a O O ❑ZII fn N •-� Zt <<Z� JWQW O Q -) t- • y fy • AGENDA ITEM V B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE OF MEETING: April 12, 2000 TOPIC: Variance, Lyndal Nelson, 87 Lilac Street DESCRIPTION: Mr. Lyndal Nelson at 87 Lilac Street is requesting a variance to allow a 442 square foot addition to his existing attached garage. The Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 30' from a local street. The south/east corner of the garage would be 26.5' from the property line. The north /east corner of the garage would be 32' from the property line. Therefore, the setback encroachment applies only to the south/east corner of the garage. Although Mr. Nelson has a very large lot, 1.6 acres, there is a low area behind the home and a large mound septic system. He would prefer to construct a three -car attached garage because a detached garage would need to be quite some distance from the home and would require the removal of an existing storage building on the property to meet ordinance requirements. This storage building is currently located approximately 13' from the property line but was constructed prior to development of the area and prior to construction of Mustang Lane. Mr. Nelson's home sits at a slight angle on his property. The proposed addition will meet or exceed the front setback requirement of 40' as his home is currently 65+ ' from the front property line. The proposed garage addition is within the minimum 1,120 . square feet allowed by the Ordinance for an attached garage. The total garage area requested is 1,114 square feet. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. In reviewing the Variance Criteria above, Staff would comment that a large maple tree exists directly behind the north/east corner of the proposed addition creating a physical circumstance unique to the property. Mr. Nelson would like to minimize disturbance to this tree and has located his garage approximately 16' from the tree. The City's Environmental Specialist, Marty Asleson, has inspected the site and determined that locating the garage 10' or more from the tree will minimize impact to the root system of the tree. Staff would suggest moving the proposed addition north to within 10' of the maple tree to minimize the requested variance. Staff would also comment that the existing right of way for Mustang Lane is 66' with a 32' constructed roadway. This leaves a boulevard of 17'. The typical residential boulevard is 15' on a 60' right of way. This 66' right of way was dedicated to the City prior to establishment of the 60' requirement. In summary, we would recommend approval of this Variance request with the following conditions: 1. The proposed addition be located 10' south of the existing maple tree to minimize the variance required on the south /east corner. 2. The proposed addition be sided to match the existing house & garage. OPTIONS: 1. Approve variance as request with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration 3. Deny requested variance. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • YOUNTY --M0f RIGHT-fOrlYAr?tAT NO J 50 y-- MAIN - CTRCE-7 — 0 LOT I IQ BLOCK I p O P 5 16 15 14 1 13 19 16 LINO 17 15 CAR 14 13 12 11 10 • I AIR, OUTLO7 8 PARK W 3 9 1 8 r9• 7 6 5 -E-gUAiFi- -NW K-- RIEHf10F W43' PL-AF 4 3 2 NORTH 11 10 8 9 2 17 THOMAS - 16 cat fd� ►�.``6 a Gcze- 1 RM N0 �4 ,, W` ®22 F, RM FA j3141b Atira '� al I '' ° c���� a �lo 'App AY IT.., cE,� .I T(' APP • sA `AGO anis wasp. ? FEcil0!9 -- LILAC-- - — STREET --- 2 5 4 3 2 1 x 7 18 SSTA - - U66 INOt/5TRiA' •■0 73 3 3 7 2 6 15 Y 4 4 5 5 5 56 6 7 6 6 B 7 7 .MERIT STREET 8 LINO LAKES REHABILITATION CENTER Om. 1..■•■•■■••■•■ 6 133HS 33S g ... taPP4.....•....: •.:•.:•• ••......••••••••••••• .::::....„.•::::::. .•••••••••..e ..:•:::.,•::•......:•..: s:•: ••:• 7 : :.-:.. '1_19 'X3 . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • cJJ 0 9 LILAC ST. 2 L 11‘ 31\3 cR •22.‘ AZ. k,t_.) 4;1— • • k. • Lyndal & Sally Nelson 4117 Lilac St. ‘IPLino Lakes, MN 55014 (651)786 -3952 Option 1: [ Nora House Garage Garage Addition Current Garage: 24x28 = 672 sq.ft. Addition: 17x26 = 442 sq.ft. Total: 1114 sq.ft. The above preferred garage addition plan provides: 1. An aesthetic addition where the garage is a part of the original structure. 2. The East side of the garage remained unsided when the house /garage was sided in 11/99, as we were planning the garage addition in the 4/2000. 3. The addition helps to provide a buffer for the enormous amount of traffic on Mustang Lane. 4. The addition provides space for a present vehicle and recreation equipment parked in front of the house. Mature Maple Tree Dog Pen 1 3' inside setback 17' - > 13.5' 3.5 30' set back from property E a s t • RECEIVED MAR 2 0 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • AGENDA ITEM V C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE OF MEETING: April 12, 2000 TOPIC: Minor Subdivision, Rick Carlson, 599 62nd Street (Junes Property) and 607 62nd Street (Rehbein Property) DESCRIPTION: The property owners at 599 and 607 62nd Street are requesting a minor subdivision to allow their homes to be split from the balance of their property which has been purchased by Mr. Carlson and is intended for future development. The property is currently Zoned Rural and guided for low density sewered residential in the Draft Comprehensive Plan. In May of 1997 the City Council approved a minor subdivision for the Junes property at 599 62nd Street that split the parcel into three pieces. Parcel A was dedicated to the City for Park as a part of the Miller's South Glen Plat with some park dedication credit for future development. This park land was added to Birchwood Acres Park. Parcel B was retained by the Junes and contains their existing homestead. Parcel C was retained by Mr. Rick Carlson for future development. Following this action, Mr. Carlson secured a purchase agreement with the Rehbeins at 607 62nd Street (Parcels E & F) and proceeded to plat that property and the Junes Parcel C into West Shadow Ponds. That development was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board and continued at the November 23rd, 1998 City Council meeting. Mr. Carlson subsequently requested a delay in Council action which is still pending. This minor subdivision request is intended to finalize purchase agreements between Mr. Carlson and the Junes and Rehbeins. The resulting parcels, new C and F, would be combined with the 1997 Parcel C and held for future development (West Shadow Ponds). Parcels B and E would remain as existing homesteads as allowed within the Zoning Ordinance, Section 3. Subd. 3., 2.b.2 which reads, in part: "Habitable single family homes constructed prior to July 13, 1992 may reduce their lot size to a minimum of one (1) acre if the balance of the property results in a parcel of ten (10) acres, or is serviced by public sewer...." Parcel B is 6.69 acres with a considerable amount of wetland. According to the ordinance, parcels of property in the Rural zoning district must contain at least 20% upland area. This parcel contains 1.29 acres of upland and 5.4 acres of wetland. We believe the .04 acre shortage in upland is insignificant in this case. Parcel E contains 1 acre with more than 20% upland. The current right -of -way for 62nd Street is 33'. The City Engineer has recommended a total of 40' of right -of -way north of the 62nd Street centerline. This will require submittal of a new survey document prior to Council action dedicating an additional 23.5' along Parcels B, E & F for furture reconstruction of 62nd Street. This new survey should provide one(1) acre exclusive of right -of -way for Parcel E. The two parcels to be held for future development contain 9.01 acres (Parcel F) and 1.67 acres (new Parcel C). Staff would recommend that these parcels be combined with the 1997 Parcel C (8.25 acres). Parcels B and E currently contain on -site septic systems and space for alternate systems should the need arise. These parcels also contain adequate frontage on a public street (62nd Street). The property owners have indicated a willingness to connect to City sewer and water when, and if, it becomes available. Staff would recommend approval of this minor subdivision as provided for within the Zoning Ordinance with the following condition: 1. The newly created Parcels C and F be combined into one tax parcel with the previously approved (1997) Parcel C. 2. Additional right -of -way is dedicated for end Street to provide 40' from the centerline along Parcels B, E, & F. Parcel E is adjusted to provide one(1) acre in area exclusive of right -of -way. OPTIONS: 1. Approve minor subdivision with condition outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration 3. Deny minor subdivision request. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 • • SHADED AREA DENOTES PARK LOCATION REVISED JAN. 1987 REV. MAY 1988 REV. AUG. 1989 ocV FEB. 1991 REVISED REV. REV. REV. NOV. 1994 JAN. I996 JULY 1997 JULY 1998 tom or ( s „1 I' S .muff +IaV M00411+4 J0 +1 +1G Jw4100S Jo IPII 1.03 10 104 1004 10 0Y3 i o3 — .f.'KfI 3 .00.00.00 0 APILOI M .01.00.00 N 00 0011005 10 +J +00 100.01+4 0 0043 1.40 En o V1 1 4{ 0- 1 a A \ \ \\ , / \ \ ,, ,., 4 __________I \_/' ,_________Nc.c.1..... ____. \ 1 rA__° 1 ,-.C5'-'-- cerv;:-----1 8 7 V 7' .\ _ 1 i"-- 8 / I 5 I ..... Fax Road 4 3LOCK 5 3 2 5 • '\C\\ 1 he North Line 0 ce —4 d BLOC 4 2 3 3 7 8 ..... Fax Road 10 BLOCK 42 3 st 1/4 of ection 32 9•9'57 329.5N- 5 of the Southwest 1/4 e 4 the North S 1 7 0 8 5 7 .... .... ... ........ 8 ............ 5 Ocs c9 et. ° '%\ ss4v 0 0 ,\ ......" 1 •-„it Nit i'lL....N.. __ ___ -- 9--"58-75-;117-58-0.7- 8 Parcel 8.92 Acr sr" ,P arc )1.09 r---- 22 r 225.1 2 Ne9311.25.W 225.12 2 Move MO rater Thit South Line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 32 0 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision. and that 1 om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. NO. • AGENDA ITEM V • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE OF MEETING: April 12, 2000 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, S.S.R. & W. Development, 7930 Lake Drive, Rezone and Minor Subdivision DESCRIPTION: SSR & W Development is the owner of a .68 acre parcel of property at 7930 Lake Drive zoned CB, Central Business and the 80+ acres immediately to the east which is zoned RX, Rural Executive. They would like to split the westerly 4 acres from the 80+ acres and rezone it to CB, Central Business (or some commercial designation) and add it to the .68 acre parcel having frontage on Lake Drive. The current comprehensive plan guides the westerly 40 acres of this 80+ acre parcel as single family residential. The draft plan guides the entire 80+ acres as low density sewered residential in the Phase I growth area (1998 - 2010). Both parcels of property are outside the current MUSA boundary, however, sewer and water are available on Lake Drive. Existing Zoning of Surrounding Property: North - CB, Central Business (All Season Rental) South - R -X, Rural Executive (Lakeview Woodlands Addition- Lois Lane - 4 100' +/- unsewered residential lots separated from the parcel to be rezoned by a 33' dedicated roadway (Dupont Avenue) East R -X, Rural Executive undeveloped parcel guided for Low Density Sewered Residential in Draft Comprehensive Plan West CB, Central Business Commercial Zoning along Lake Drive The property owner does not currently have a specific development for this parcel of property. He does believe, however, that a larger site would be better suited to commercial development and enhances the developability of the .68 acre parcel especially given the 185' width at the south property line and minimum 40' front setback from Lake Drive. He is anticipating a future platting of the area that would provide access from Lake Drive, subject to Anoka County review, should the rezone request be approved. Utilities are currently available on Lake Drive to serve this development, however, until adoption of a Comprehensive Plan, no MUSA designation is available for this site. Again, the area is guided for sewered development in the draft plan. Any future development of the site will be contingent upon City Approval of MUSA, a preliminary /final plat, access /roadway configuration and site and building plan review. In consideration of a rezone the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. 3. The proposed use conformswith all performance standards contained herein. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use isvithin capabilities of streets serving the property. The City's EDAC reviewed this request unanimously recommended approval. Should the P & Z determine that the requested rezone meets the above described criteria staff would recommend the following conditions of approval: 1. The draft comprehensive land use maps are amended to reflect a commercial designation for the newly created 4 acre parcel prior to adoption of the plan. 2. A minor subdivision is approved for the newly created 4 acre parcel and that parcel is legally combined with the .68 acre parcel fronting on Lake Drive. 3. Development of the site is contingent upon adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and allocation of MUSA. Should the P & Z determine that a rezone of this parcel does not meet the above criteria, staff would suggest the following Findings of Fact on a motion to deny the request. Additionally, an application for rezone may not be resubmitted for 12 months unless all reasons for denial have been satisfied or unless reconsidered by the City Council: 1. The proposed Rezone fails to meet criteria described above until such time as the City's Comprehensive Plan is adopted, "1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed Rezone fails to meet criteria described above until such time as a development plan is submitted and reviewed "5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property." • • • • OPTIONS: 1. Approve rezone with conditions outlined above. 2. Deny rezone with Findings indicated above. 3. Approve Minor Subdivision with the combination of two parcels. 4. Deny Minor Subdivision RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 and 3 • • gi frAsermim jal, nimpantitirooqiimmig RIMPIONMIpenkk NMI N(7 vaiiiimaimmorneems 1 th Rs inummer ii EhMIIIIIImmarl IV l,nrra N. mum 10)°111.44,011 10! Illibialwee Ewe - -20- iull,r6, rah 1,1wp , it.■-•.14 - - - iI IMO BMW Ar 1.111111110M6W11:1111i Mil 12;ifignaR e AmilkErnaum ems VAN. Catiliginommenr-,.., inuar win ‘ Ronifignillo)/49 • pasammoktolAi lorin11111111 frtAmmofiv: IL.Dii p. /MARSHAN LAKE Sent By: Glenn Rehbein Co; 6127846001; Mar-28-00 2:14PM; Page 2/2 06c\ c,° // 1-0 ..•_ •_. tt. 900.3 914.7 • 4 !, _ 912.3 - ■ ;---. " • / 90“ •90111.1 1 1: I I, 1 / RESEW �� anon ©a mosammeitistiMing mum ; INEIN J -. ■ M " 2 ST TES 8 7 8 v Lino ark 141 FAQ® 12 • • • AGENDA ITEM V E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE OF MEETING: April 12, 2000 TOPIC: DESCRIPTION: PUBLIC HEARING, Lino Lakes State Bank, Otter Lake Drive & New Service Road, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review & Minor Subdivision The Lino Lakes State Bank is requesting a conditional use permit, site plan review and minor subdivision to allow the construction of a branch bank at Otter Lake Drive and a "to be constructed" new roadway. The property is Zoned GB, General Business and guided for commercial development in the current and draft comprehensive plan. A bank building with drive - through capacity requires a conditional use permit. The submittal complies with the requirements of the GB Zoning District as follows: Building: The proposed bank building will be similar in appearance to the existing structure at Lake Drive and Town Center Parking. The building areas is 3,420 square feet and set back 26.7' from Otter Lake Road. As a collector roadway, the required setback in this location is 40'. Staff would recommend that the westerly parking area be shifted to within 10' of the side property line providing the require 40' setback on the eastern side of the site. Exterior finishes include stucco, face brick and asphalt shingles. The trash handling areas REQUIRED PROPOSED Lot size minimum 20,000 s.f. 62,500 s.f. Lot width minimum 100 ft. 250 ft. Building square footage 3,420 s.f. Setbacks: buildings From local street 30 ft. 99 ft. From collector street 40 ft. 27.6 ft. Rear lot line 30 ft 85 ft. + Side lot line 10 ft. 100 ft. Parking: From street 15 ft. 16 ft. Rear lot line 10 ft. 16 ft. Side lot line 10 ft. 22 ft. Building height 45 ft. Green space 25 % (.35 acres) .44 acres Building: The proposed bank building will be similar in appearance to the existing structure at Lake Drive and Town Center Parking. The building areas is 3,420 square feet and set back 26.7' from Otter Lake Road. As a collector roadway, the required setback in this location is 40'. Staff would recommend that the westerly parking area be shifted to within 10' of the side property line providing the require 40' setback on the eastern side of the site. Exterior finishes include stucco, face brick and asphalt shingles. The trash handling areas Page 2 will be located on the south /west corner of the site and screened from adjoining property. Screening materials will be subject to City review and approval. Lighting: Lighting materials are not indicated on the plan. A photometric plan showing lighting intensity on the site will be required to assure compliance with City Ordinances. Lighting fixtures shall be directed downward and comply with CPTED recommendations. Signage: Signage is not indicated on the plan. All signs are subject to the City's Sign Ordinance and require sign permit applications. Landscaping: The landscaping plans has been reviewed by the Environmental Board and found acceptable. Landscaping will be similar to the bank at Lake Drive and Village Center Parkway. Utilities: Utilities are available to serve the site from Otter Lake Road. Road, Access, Circulation: Two driveways are proposed for the site. The westerly driveway will be shared with the parcel to the west. A shared driveway agreement will be required prior to issuance of building permits. An exit only driveway is proposed on the east side of the site. Design of this exit will be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. A copy of the Engineers report is attached for P & Z information. A temporary access will be allowed off Otter Lake Drive while the new roadway is under construction. This roadway, yet unnamed, is intended to serve the GB area north and west of the new bank. Parking: There are 44 parking spaces provided in the plan including handicapped spaces. According to City Ordinance, Financial Institutions require 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet thus requiring 16 spaces for this structure. The applicant has indicated that he will not be constructing the 13 spaces on the west side of the site until the need is demonstrated. This will reduce the number of spaces to 31. The City would require this western side of the parking area to be curbed and seeded to blend with the landscape plan. Minor Subdivision: To facilitate this development a minor subdivision is necessary. The proposed lot will be 250' x 250' for 62,500 square feet. The minimum lot size in a GB District is 20,000 square feet. Staff would require a survey document containing the building placement prior to issuance of any building permits. The current survey document indicates no structures. • • • • • • Page 3 Park Dedication: A cash park dedication fee will be required according to City Ordinance. EDAC Recommendation: The City's Economic Development Advisory Commission has reviewed the proposal and has recommended approval. Conditional Use Permit: The criteria used to evaluate a CUP includes the following: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. b. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and /or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and water systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. e. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. f. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions or operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. g. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. h. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. i. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. In addition, when reviewing a drive - through facility the following criteria must be considered. a. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area so as to cause impairment in Page 4 property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. b. At the boundaries of a residential use or district, a strip of not less than ten (10) feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance withSection 3, Subd. 4.S.of this Ordinance. c. Parking areas shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.S. of this Ordinance. d. Parking areas and driveways shall be curbed with continuous curb not less than six (6) inches high above the parking lot or driveway grade. e. Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movements, shall comply with Section 3, Subd. 5.of this Ordinance and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. f. The entire area shall have a drainageystem which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. g. The entire area other than occupied by buildings or structures or planting shall be surfaced with a concrete or bituminousmaterial which will control dust and drainage and which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. h. All signing and information or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Appendix C of the City Code. Summary: In summary, staff would recommend approval of this minor subdivision, site plan review and conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. A survey document indicating building placement is provided prior to issuance of building permits. 2. A cash dedication fee, based on City Ordinance, is submitted with the building permit. 3. The western parking area is shifted to within 10' of the side property line providing a 40' setback on the eastern side of the side. The site plan and landscaping plan shall be modified to reflect this revision. 4. Proper building permits are obtained and include a 1% escrow deposit to insure completion of site improvements. Building plans will be subject to the review and comment of our CPTED Officer. 5. A photometric lighting plan is submitted prior to issuance of any building permits and approved by City staff. 6. Sign permits are obtained prior to installation. 7. Utility, grading, and drainage plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. Permits are obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed prior to any site work. 9. Concerns addressed by the City Engineer in his memo of 4 -6 -00 are addressed prior to any site work. • • • • • • Page 5 10. The trash handling areas is screened as approved by City staff. 11. A shared driveway agreement is provided prior to issuance of building permits. OPTIONS: 1. Approve minor subdivision, site plan review and conditional use permit with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Memorandum DATE: April 6, 2000 TO: Jeff Smyser, Mary Kay Wylan FROM: John Powell, City Engineer RE: Lino Lakes State Bank Branc Site Plan Review Per your request, we have reviewed the site plan for a new Lino Lakes State Bank branch to be constructed in the Clearwater Creek Development Center. The basis for our review included the following documents: 1. Grading, Site, and Landscape plans dated 3/14/00 prepared by W.A.T. McCully of Glenn Rehbein Companies. 2. Hydrology calculations, received via fax from W.A.T. McCully, dated 3/29/00. 3. Certificate of Survey, received via fax from Tim Kytonen, dated 3/21/00. Our comments are as follows: 1. This project is located on the southwest comer of existing Otter Lake Road and a proposed service road. The City has access to the proposed service road property but has not yet constructed the proposed improvements. In response to the development of this site, the City will proceed with the installation of the improvements on the service road. The improvements will include sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and street construction. The improvements shown on the proposed site plan reflect the applicant's concept of the service road. They do not necessarily reflect the City's plan. All work within the service road easement will be the responsibility of the City of Lino Lakes. 2. The storm sewer plan shows a connection to a catch basin on Otter Lake Road. This storm sewer must be routed to connect to the proposed service road storm sewer. 3. The storm sewer has less than two feet of cover in some areas which will make it more susceptible to frost heaving and damage due to traffic loads. 4. Time of concentration calculations need to be submitted. 5. The drainage from this site will be routed to the regional storm water pond • located near Clearwater Creek. An on -site water quality pond is not required. • Jeff Smyser, Mary Kay Wyland April 6, 2000 • However, this site's post development runoff is double the pre - development runoff. Restrictions should be placed in the storm sewer to limit the runoff rate to pre - development conditions in order to preserve adequate storm sewer capacity for adjacent development. 6. Storm sewer hydraulic computations have not been submitted. 7. No storm sewer details are shown. 8. The location of the rock entrance is not shown. The "coral sea" reference should be deleted. 9. The eastern exit from the site must be striped and signed to show it is right turn only. 10. The western access will be used by the adjacent site also. 11.The final Certificate of Survey must be submitted. 12. The proposed pavement section is not shown. 13.A wetland mitigation plan has not been submitted. A permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District is required for the site grading and wetland mitigation. 14.A permit is required from Anoka County for any work within the Otter Lake Road right -of -way. 15.The plan indicates this site is in Blaine and is south of "Frechman" Road, neither is correct. 16.There are two CB5's on the plan. 17.The southwest portion of the grading plan does not show the grading transition into the wetland. 18.The utility services into the building shall six inch, minimum. 19. Disturbed areas must be re- vegetated as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please let me know. • CITY OP UNO LAKES CITY OF CENTERVILLE 1:,;:. -ir 6. Ns 11 `'EMI O � CO`W a P vs otidE M • $ o d arErty MBINCEM °� :EN sand tca 13 CITY OF LINO LAKES matt falcimumn \\ 24 PEIV40 'a ro •o•rt L—UXIX71— RATE —a10 __INDUSTR/AL , tt: Is le — PARK / T i�cr_v ilt f �1i_ o:rdp UW INA NM • Sent By: Glenn Rehbein Co; 6127846001; Mar -21 -00 1:29PM; Page 2/2 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: Lino Lakes State Bank — Branch Proposed Property Description: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24. Township 31. Range 22, Anoka County Minnesota. deecrlbed as commencing at the northeast corner of said SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, thence south along the East line of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 4.4 minutes 55 second West 405.00 feet; thence on a bearing West 50.00 feet to the westerly right —of —way line of Otter Lake Road; thence South 00 degrees 44 minutes 55 seconds West, along sold right —of —way line, 30.00 feet to the point of beginning of the property to be described; thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 53 seconds West 250.00 feet, along the South Line of a 60.00 foot Roadway Easement; thence South 00 degrees 44 minutes 55 seconds West 250.00 feet. thence North 89 degrees 47 minutes 53 seconds East 250 feet to the westerly right — of—way line of Otter Lake Rood; thence North CO degrees 44 minute. 55 seconds East, along said right —of —way line, 250.00 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to easements of record If any. (MAIN S4 • C ^S. A.H. 14 NE Cor. of the SW 1/4- of NE 1/4 of Sew 24. Road Easement --vt( South Line of Road Ea wan cnl 250.00 r 250.00 SCALE: 1 inch =100 feet o Denotes Iron Job No.: 00012 N 1 Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of o survey of the boundaries of the above desrcibed land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated thisa(_7 day off j , 2000 ey � Minn. Reg. No, 1 21 EHBEIN • 865 1 NAPLES Sr. N.£ 4NNNCAPOUS. IJN SS446, PN (112) 7a4-0657 rAx (112) 784 -50ot � LINO LAKES STATE BANK BRANCH • • LINO LAKES STATE BANK BRANCH 915.30 r p 1 P2 7P2 914.40 P1 4.50 • 917.70 p P2 MOP M LC F LT R 4,00. FABR C SEPARATED "BY METAL EDGING FROMSODDED AREA (TYPIGA FOR An BED 5-BH , lif ii i. !...r..., 1,...17.1... 40 in anhij 1 1/ IIIIIIII..Lt 0. ICA 1111 ll 4ijf.: . . 4, 3-C1 /- R2 7-MJ 2-BH PRAIRIE WILDFLOWERS PLANTING 'BY PRAIRIE ORATIONS (NO EDGING) • 01 3-MJ 4.20 913.90 PRAIRIE IWERS PLANTRII BY PR 3.ESTORATIONS. (NO EDGING) -R2 02 02 01 , PERENIAL PLANTING BED BY OWNER • 2 • • • sumo ASPHALT SHINGLES FACE BRICK NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION L I srucco ASPHALT SHINGLES FACE BRICK STUCCO ASPHALT SHI GLES FACE BRICK 1111111.111111. STUCCO ASPHALT SHINGLES FACE BRICK • • • AGENDA ITEM V. F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: April 12, 2000 TOPIC: Site & Building Plan Review PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit Dairy Queen, 21st Ave. at Northern Lights Blvd. BACKGROUND The application includes a site plan and conditional use permit for a new Dairy Queen on 21st Ave. at Northern Lights Blvd. The site is zoned GB General Business. Restaurants with a drive - through facility require a conditional use permit in the GB district. This site is part of a preliminary plat that was approved by the City in December 1997. No final plat was approved. It is best to clean up this situation by requiring that a final plat be approved as a condition of approval for the Dairy Queen. To this end, this report addresses the site plan, CUP, and also discusses platting issues. The applicant for the Dairy Queen project is not the landowner who is responsible for the platting requirements. However, the plat issues must be resolved before additional development occurs. ANALYSIS The submittal complies with the GB zoning standards as follows: Required 20,000 sf Proposed 29,223 Lot size minimum Lot width minimum 100 ft 130 ft Setbacks: buildings from street rear lot line side lot line parking from street rear lot line side lot line 30 ft 30 ft 10 ft 15 ft 10 ft 10 ft 30 ft 130 ft 45 ft 15 ft 18 ft 10 ft Bldg. height 45 ft 18 ft Green space 25% 37% Dairy Queen April 12, 2000 page 2 • Building The building footprint is 1655 sf (roughly 40 x 40). The proposed elevations originally submitted showed predominantly corrugated metal panels with red glazed brick around the foundation. The City does not allow metal panels to comprise more than 50% of the entire building (all elevations). On elevations facing a street, metal panels may not exceed 20% of the wall surface. (Sec. 3 Subd. 4.B.1. of the zoning ordinance.) The applicant's architect submitted revised elevations on April 4. The new elevations show EFIS rather than metal panels. EFIS is a simulated stucco, which is acceptable. The building's tallest point will be 18 ft., though the proposed sign will be 19+ ft. The north elevation will include 26 ft of glass windows at the pedestrian level. The west elevation, facing 21st Ave., will include one door and the drive - through pickup window. The south elevation will include a fenced in area for the cooler /freezer. The fence material will be painted cedar. The east elevation, facing the parking lot, will include a double door and 20+ ft of windows. The trash will be enclosed in the southeast corner of the parking lot. The fencing material will be painted cedar. • Lighting Light fixture locations in the parking lot are shown on submitted plans. Building and site lighting should be addressed with a photometric showing site lighting intensity. Lighting must not exceed one foot candle at the street center lines. Lot lighting must be directed downward and not up into the night sky. • Signage Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance. Sign permits are required for all signs. All signs will be reviewed with the sign permit applications. A preliminary look raises a concern regarding the number of signs. One building sign is allowed totaling 20% of the building face area. The building elevations show signs on three sides of the building in addition to the larger building sign with the Dairy Queen name and ice cream cone. Any pylon sign must be five feet from the lot lines and there is a size maximum. The revised landscaping plan shows plantings instead of a pylon sign. This must be clarified. • Landscaping The original landscaping plan included a very minimal amount of plantings. We received a revised landscaping plan April 4. Though there are numerous trees added, staff will work with the applicant to improve the plan. • • • Dairy Queen April 12, 2000 page 3 • Plat Issues This site is part of a preliminary plat that was approved by the City in December 1997. No final plat was approved. It is not clear how or why the Amoco convenience store was approved without a final plat. At any rate, is best to clean up this situation by requiring that a final plat be approved as a condition of approval for the Dairy Queen site plan and CUP. The proposed final plat is attached. On the submitted final plat, Block 2 includes two lots where the preliminary plat had only one larger lot. Staff does not view this as a problem at this time because the remainder of the site is to be platted as a large outlot. In the future, if the landowner wants to create more lots overall than were approved by the preliminary plat, we will require a new preliminary plat. However, since we do not know how many lots will ultimately be created, staff is comfortable with the number of lots on the submitted final plat. We are not technically reviewing a final plat application. However, because the final plat will be a condition of approval for the Dairy Queen, it is appropriate to discuss the preliminary plat conditions. Failure to meet the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat will delay approval of the final plat, which will delay the Dairy Queen project. Conditions of Approval for Preliminary Plat, 1997: 1. Consideration is given to expanding the width of Lot 2 Block 1 in a manner such that it is consistent with other lot widths within the subdivision. This was not a strict requirement, rather a suggestion. Lot 2 meets the minimum lot width at the setback line. 2. The right -of -way width of Northern Lights Blvd. is expanded from 60 feet to 80 feet in accordance with City Subdivision standards for commercial /industrial streets. This condition was eliminated by the City Council. Sixty feet was deemed acceptable based on the recommendation of the City Engineer at the time. 3. A wetland mitigation plan is submitted and approved by the City Engineer. The Rice Creek Watershed District has permitting authority over wetland impacts. A wetland plan was approved by the RCWD in 1997 and amended in 1998. However, RCWD has sent numerous letters to the landowner regarding lack of compliance with the permit conditions. An October letter to the landowner states: "Your permit on this site is a rough graded and wetland alteration plan only. You must obtain a final site grading permit before any additional impervious surfaces or buildings are installed." A February 2000 letter states that the RCWD will be drawing from the landowner's Dairy Queen April 12, 2000 page 4 financial security to complete required activity because the landowner did not comply with the permit conditions. 4. Consideration is given to identifying full development of the property (future lot configuration) on the preliminary plat and establishing an outlot (or outlots) on the final plat to accommodate future development phases. This is exactly what is being proposed with the submitted final plat drawing. 5. The preliminary plat and grading plan depictions of Outlot A are revised to be graphically consistent. This will be reviewed. 6. Soil borings are taken which demonstrate the buildability of the subject property. This will be reviewed for final plat approval. 7. The 100 year floodplain elevation, building pad elevations, and street elevations are identified. The floodplain map shows the floodplain covering the current Amoco site and a corner of the Dairy Queen site. We have not received floodplain elevations. See condition 10 below. 8. The Park Board provide recommendation in regard to park dedication requirements. Park dedication will occur per standard City policy. 9. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation in regard to the following: City maintenance responsibilities associated with 21' Ave. Grading and drainage. Easement establishment. Utilities. Floodplain containment. Hydric soil limitations. These will be addressed per standard review procedure. See attached memo from the City Engineer, dated April 6, 2000. 10. That there be a letter of map revision obtained by the applicant from FEMA relating to the floodplain. The floodplain map shows the floodplain covering the current Amoco site and a corner of the Dairy Queen site. We have not received a copy of a FEMA map revision for this site. We understand the applicant's engineer is preparing the map revision application. • • • • Dairy Queen April 12, 2000 page 5 11. Joint powers agreement regarding 21st Ave. This agreement is now in place. • Utilities Sanitary sewer and water service exist in the Northern Lights Blvd. alignment. However, an easement must be dedicated to the City in this alignment. The utilities themselves have not yet been dedicated to the City. This will be reviewed as part of the final plat approval. An easement for utilities in the future Northern Lights Blvd. location is shown on the draft final plat. Stormwater management must be properly addressed. The current ditch draining east to a pond near the freeway was a temporary measure. Complete stormwater facilities must be constructed to accommodate the Dairy Queen project. The City Engineer's memo addresses these issues further. • Parking For fast food restaurants, our code requires at least 15 parking spaces per 1000 sf of gross floor area. For the purposes of calculating parking spaces, the ordinance requirement is to use 90% of the floor area. That is, 90% of approx. 1655 sf is 1490 sf, or 1.49 x 1000. Fifteen parking spaces x 1.49 = 22 spaces required. This site plan shows 22. • Roads, Access, Circulation There will be one driveway access to the Dairy Queen site on Northern Lights Blvd. Entering vehicles can either proceed into the parking area or turn right for the drive - through. Northern Lights Blvd., like the utilities, has not been dedicated to the City. This will be addressed as part of the final plat review. The City Council discussed the right of way width in 1997. While our current standard is 80 ft for a commercial road, the City Engineer in 1997 recommended 60 ft.. The Lino Lakes side of the 21St Ave. right of way will be dedicated as part of the final plat, as shown on the draft final plat. Work on completing this portion of 21St Ave. and Northern Lights Blvd. can begin with the completion of a developer's agreement, which typically is part of the platting process. The City Engineer's memo addresses these issues further. Dairy Queen April 12, 2000 page 6 • Park Dedication The Park Board met April 3 and agreed to the cash dedication per City policy of $200 per 1000 sf. For the Dairy Queen with 1655 sf, the dedication would be $331. • Conditional Use Permit Findings As stated in Sec. 2 Subd. 2.B.7., the Planning and Zoning Board shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit only if it can make findings that the proposed use at the proposed location: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. b. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the comprehensive plan of the City and this ordinance. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and/or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. e. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. f Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, . glare, or odors. g. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. h. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. i. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. In addition to those findings, Sec. 7 Subd. 3.H.5. states that accessory drive- through facilities are allowed as a conditional use in the GB zone provided that the following findings can be made: a. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area so as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. • Dairy Queen April 12, 2000 page 7 b. At the boundaries of a residential use or district, a strip of not less than ten (10) feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.S. of this Ordinance. c. Parking areas shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.S. of this Ordinance. d. Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movements, shall comply with Section 3, Subd. 5. of this Ordinance and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. e. The entire area shall have a drainage system which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. f. All signing and information or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with Appendix C of the City Code. g. Provisions shall be made to control and reduce noise from any exterior audio equipment. With the recommended conditions of approval, the project will comply with these required findings. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION On March 29 the Environmental Board recommended approval of the Dairy Queen site plan subject to continued work on the landscape plan and lighting plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT If the P & Z recommends approval of this project, staff recommends the following conditions apply: 1. The final plat must obtain approval from the City before a building permit is issued for the Dairy Queen. The conditions of approval for the preliminary plat must be met before final plat approval. 2. Building material shall be as shown on revised exterior elevations received April 4, 2000, showing EIFS as the primary material, rather than corrugated metal. The fence around the cooler and the trash enclosure shall be painted cedar wood, not corrugated metal. These materials shall be reflected on building permit submittals. 3. A lighting plan for the Dairy Queen site must be submitted and must meet City lighting requirements before a building permit is issued. Lighting information shall include a photometric plan as well as figures of any lot and exterior building fixtures. Lighting shall be directed downward and not up into the night sky. Dairy Queen April 12, 2000 page 8 4. Approval of the site plan and conditional use permit is not an implied approval of signage. All signs require a sign permit and must comply with the sign ordinance. 5. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. Prior to issuance of building permits, building plans must be reviewed by the City CSO for compliance with CPTED recommendations. 6. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to additional grading on the Dairy Queen site. In addition, failure to comply with Watershed District permit requirements will delay final plat approval by the City. 7. Final utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. 8. The City Engineer's concerns, included in his memo of April 6, 2000, must be addressed to his satisfaction. 9. A landscaping plan must meet with the approval of the City Environmental Specialist. 10. Park dedication shall be paid per City policy. OPTIONS 1. Approve site plan and conditional use permit based on the findings in this report and with the conditions of approval listed above. 2. Continue to next meeting, return to staff with direction. 3. Deny application for site plan and conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. • • • • • Memorandum DATE: April 6, 2000 TO: Jeff Smyser, Mary Kay Wylan FROM: John Powell, City Engineer RE: Dairy Queen Site Plan Review Per your request, we have reviewed the site plan for a new Dairy Queen to be constructed in the Clearwater Creek Business Center. The basis for our review included the following documents: 1. Title Sheet, Site, Landscape plans dated 3/13/00 prepared by Archnet. 2. Dimensioned Site, Utility, and Grading plans dated 3/13/00, prepared by Jim DeBenedet of Stevens Engineers. 3. Hydrology calculations, received via fax from Stevens Engineers, dated 3/30/00. Our comments are as follows: 1. The final plat for Clearwater Creek Business Center will be considered and discussed in a separate action from the Dairy Queen. Issues related to the plat are not presented. 2. This project is located on the southeast corner of existing 21st Avenue and Northern Lights Boulevard; neither of these roads has been constructed to their final sections. Construction of these roadways must be concurrent with the completion of these site improvements. 3. The runoff from this site currently drains via a ditch to the east, then south, eventually reaching a temporary pond north of Clearwater Creek. The intersection of 21st Avenue and Northern Lights Boulevard will drain directly south via storm sewer to a regional pond located on the north side of Clearwater Creek. This regional pond can be sized to accommodate the Dairy Queen water quality needs. Rate control should be provided on site through a flow restriction in the storm sewer. 4. The drainage calculations do not show pre - development conditions. 5. The calculated flows for developed conditions appear low but the designed storm sewer has adequate capacity to handle increased flow. Jeff Smyser, Mary Kay Wyland April 6, 2000 6. The storm sewer has Tess than two feet of cover in some areas which will make it more susceptible to frost heaving and damage due to traffic loads 7. A permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District is required for the site grading. 8. Disturbed areas must be re- vegetated as soon as possible. 9. Access will be limited to one driveway onto Northern Lights Boulevard. 10. Sanitary sewer and water service is available from Northern Lights Boulevard. If you have any questions, please let me know. • • • bum m00poucri EBEI � ommo aw r° Bpi INCRIEFFICIMMISICIIM oa iftWP slesitiagordsZ mirt A 1 • 3- FE.,-.;::::;.. .:".'' ''.---:-.--::;:"7,7:-.7: '.: - - -�- ;CLEARWATER CREFK 2ND ADD rill' 411MI MD AIM PRELIMINARY PLAT Q'y/)rl `(67 7 •CLEARWATER CREEK BUSINESS >N. ♦ • • .£. LL_ Li_ ZONING NDUSTRIAL •:I .. • �H• ♦ o`� L6 OCt�L 1j1 i 1NG 6117 '66 -0512 ZONNG-GB j BITUMINOUS ROAD L 4 4 1 L t i• -4- r% r- r• T IVI .1 11 \1 1 h1 t^� `: 1 6 . 1 1 1 -■ I t \ �I 1 1 ♦� m "`'- "` -- -tol'- — f— 90 `I`Y t "E \— `— _`,_ --=...-_-_--.....--- �- ■ ■ \- _\ 40 — \— — / c \ \ \ \` \ \ \'4 \ \ \\ \ \\ ?a. \ \\\ \ \ \\ 0 \ \\ \,p \ \\ \ \\ 1\;\0\\ o% 0 3'v ` \ 9. 4 \ co o 1 1 / I/ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ 7 g. h\\\\ ;9, 3 \ \\ \\ \\ CP \\ \ \\ •P■ s 1 I 1 \ 04- ♦\ \ \ \ 1 T \\\\ \ \`pi ,261 • °';� / \ / - \ \ \\ 2. 1 .11 h , X o,! 1 ! 4 `\1\` '' wL,, Dili ,�j /�� ♦/ ' / ��I y'�'.I J( / ( / 1 l 1\ \\ W6 I -,� 1 /�o °.�i //i 1 i 1 yrl�a�I;I� �`d I /( i I \ 11" � ,�`\� 4 •,,I... ♦. / / 1 ( ' 361 \ �t71 ` / / I 1 ..• / �— �� - -- - --)\ '111`1 ° 3 I °o' I / / I I I ,• I ss. `It` ♦. ^ _ _ 99..0. � 11111 Z z I / 1 1 I\ \ l ♦i �1 _ -' �� — `"1/111111 \ \1 \ . \ s'+ � -� �0`Jn 1 '1111 ti \. I I __ w 11111 1 1 I \. W9 r' ^■-��� '11111 C� _ / 295 '= =t`. LI 26d o�-� ^. ! j - - I 1111 -- N139/4 03 75.04 % \ 265 t 1 \ \ \_� /! /'/ ��j111 1 4o so-056 1 to 1 / I 1 \ \ N. / / "'> 011111 1 \ \ \ / / 1 l $ 4`441111 f -- ° 1 `. \ \ 4 -/ / 1 / II Iii °i b [ \ 1 ^. \ \;.... \�i 1\ \ r. ■ '� II11 riDll3TRIAl_ a --1 vi \ sos f i \ : _ \ 1 1 m1111 .`. n / 1 �9a war 1 \ . ` \ n \ ■ �. i io 1111 _ gohi —:;a+ - -� OUTLOf .4\ ': ( \ •. 1O (111 / - _ X55/ I } �,r• / /,/ \1 1 .\yam \ \\ / // t L \\,)c ' /\ R 1L NOR . _ `/Q ,/ 7I 2 ev— ! >L � � J / a� ql /367.90 '''''''"°4 r - ;4: 2a0 _ r.--g - 00 IeY3L907 ..1-1 i / „--s—:,, C, \ \�� / WILLOW SETBAVCroNC 1 I �tv / T 1 \� \ t 6• ,ay I i / ' \ 1 �/ T / '� —N909 1 v\ 1\ . �\ \ 1 1 V I / / 2 1 I 6y Co / \ / 1' / I I �• I j 1 f /—so, — v/ �� 1 401 1 y�ql r Y � // // ,WEST 1/4 CORNER i OF SEC. 24. 131, R22 / ANOKA CO. 1AON. / 589.47'03 "W 1313.92 i \l / ; / / / / !/ / 1. / / / / \ / \ \ \ ,/ /`4 ail II / :a1 111 r / \ 11 903 / ! / is 111 Z -- / \ \ l ''� 111 9092°3-.° D2 . `\ .' \\. \ c 111 II i' m ) �/ 1,�: -,- � i \ \ III •ri7itnrt':�sL•"�; Z.E:,. / I / /` ', III r II I 1 I / / / / / / \ 10 1 1 / / , SOU LINE OF 1 OF E NW �4 6 1 1 1 1 I CLEARWATER CREEK BUSINESS CENTER J • 3 p $89'4703 -W ( 1313.92 104 1 n 40 N89.14'15 "E A0.07 66.35 317.00 1 1 }., ° 31 n 61 • -- r_ -N. line of 5E1/4 of the `- �- Int NW1 /A of Section 24 lr N85'03'07 "1I 402.00 40 1 0 40 NI Ih 1 of )h vg pp I 14., 327.58 �<.S��S7. / /nti / ^3y NORTHERN LIGHTS •l•89 R;? ,8 4".35;';', „Q J L 40 85.00 R 689'14'15"W 213.22 2 4i ./ R 58952 51 W BoULEVARD 367.90 103.20 (_ -P = \� a. _T .p \ — ;;,48.7 3. \ a b\\ \ \J3s\ m \\ ) r--- 72361 - - -, 1_ I ° °I In 1 •l 1- L N89•52'51 -E —I J r 225.01 I— _I 1° 2 °I I ✓°1 n1 I- L J N89•52'51 "E 225.01 �40 00 235.00 N89'47'03 "E } 275.00 0 �1 w 1 e 0 0 � 4 0 9' 202.18 7 /,.r' NORTH \ tel \ Vl X cn \ 0% trl \ td O \ 0' 'Z __ -__�30 ]0� 1 I 1 81 / 8 / SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 / .' ` / /ThF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 24 503.60 41111W4 ALL I olo Cc The Soothe.: South 375 It of sold Sou. Weal line of 20 seconds ' eenlrol an91e thence 400th solo south It ona Thol DJT Pn /hot Port el distant 1313. Northwest 0 North 89 de minutes 52 minutes 07 Stole Aid 41 shown soused on lh In witness w STATE OF 4 COUNTY OF The forego4 No torry Pot8 My Commis M 401ne01 • STATE 00 4 COUNTY OF The fore9oir No Tory PPuel■ Sty Commbl In witness . Signed: T 4 ' 0 . I . Cer&C L. Ri •. • STATE OF COUNTY OF The Iorego& of the Coro wyP• • witnessn Shred: DL1 STATE DF 1 COUNTY 00 ' .0 t The laegc `\ on 006811 t J. \ N - : 1:775 PuD \ 4y Commis \ 05 M '' I hereby 0, \ en _ 1 _ shown on I \ "' t3 ore no will \ ^A Rene1A o- ( lo'" 4lnnesolo ( o $ 5747E OF 1 COUNTY 0 1 CA / 1M lore9. 1 o wotory ouD 1 tit, 4y Commit 1 I,1 1 1 J 1040,00000 1 _ receipt " I eceipt of 11'7 ' I BY r_- AO :. Thh plot e TO \• RP Lorry H0N: pi - 04noko 0.. w 5iJ a 62 0 40 S89'47 0 3 "W 275.00 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 00 wit MD N89'47'03'2 706.07 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS THUS: ( IN FEET ) 1 Ind) w 100 fl i L5 9808 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. • rPLAMINGS SCHEDULE 1- • 1 1 DEM pumr. COMMON AND LATIN NAMES esze ea REMARKS • A i5 RED OAK 2 -i/2" CONT. . 3 13 MAPLE, NORTHN00D 2 -1/2" CONT. . 0 D i4 I SPIR°_A, GOLD FLAB 18" 2 GAL 3' -0" O.G. SPACING i Q E. 6 NNE SARK, DARTS 80W 18" 2 SAL 3' -0" O.G. SPACft 8 :. ® P b NElbEl A, R_ 7 PRINCE 15" 2 GAL 3' -0" O.G. SPACING - ALL TREES TO BE 5' -0" !E!& AND 2" DIA. MIN. AT PLANTING NITH A MATURI i : OF AT LEAST 20' -0" - LANDSCAP=_ CONTRACTOR OR NURSERY TO VERIFY PLANTINGS S1-I0 N TO 3E SUITA3LE FOR AREAS AND AARRANTY PRODUCTS INSTALLED !OVER TREE N HOLE UPRiSHT FASTEN TREE TO 14 6ALLSE P.JAZLE ZING COAT= ARE CONNECTED TO BLAGK MAR BARDS BIT Herr THROLY.Ip. SECURE PRl4T AND !FATLY Ai " ALTER/ATE STAKRkS DETAIL 2410' /tlOD STA/ 10PTIGHNJ I� ft ^ri F t RI; fkre =I X71, DECIDUOUS TRS= MMRD TREE 1W 4' YIWE TREE MRAPPN S TO FIRST E RANO44 8 14 6AUNE PLIABLE WIRE RR STOKES LAM CR PLANTINS EED PLANTAS MIKT'RE PEA ROCK 6' DEPTH VHDISTLRBED SOIL OR COMPACTED N.T.5. • I r�51 DECIDUOUS S -4R'a N.T.S. LAIN GR PAVED SJRPAGE r LAYER OP ML:OD CHIP MNLH FLAWS* MIXTURE UNDISTUREEED OR COMPACTED SOIL 2Ist AVENUE SOUTH 3 LA179GAPE UYI= EK. IGIR SP1SOT I tlJNRED TO 1N6ic_ THAT LANDSCAPE: MAMTTNANCE CAN SE ALCOMPLISHED 1500 BUILDING PLANTER 50X2:15/ Y ANH:l1 °_A' • .% . J.., ',`. .' `.',',`.'ate% LANDBGA°E FLAN LI SCAN• I" •O' -0' LOT GROSS AREA = 29,223.2: 30% GREEN AREA = 5,75741 (REQUIRED) PLAN GREEN AREA = IC,9L5.9 (31% PROVIDED) RECEIVE APR = 2000 CITY OF LINO, LAKES 0 z O ELES rT1 ND. CR" "A. 0,95•116•4 MOE X !• 3•13. •001104.• Cs7a3K voinw CCM. MOD raze shiaoatm GGLOS *IV TO IMOLA CAPPL.I.0411. COLO. MD 1 rok• GAP MAYA.. 441-04 R=.■ DAM. d1351 INJILOOff Sin OCSUO 1101.4A1.4AOA ffr OTIO• TAM Off. INDTALLLO p700040. 00110.300 VW • .1.,1411.1132 ROLM TO •VET VI ••••• TO AITAONNIENT OCTAL. Nralor4ivr‘vii .„, ■iplopir-veiggp-- r Atilk ALIA, A Ale■ \ 11\11 13.•••••• COLOI• anA1,-Thau Fax.•1 ffr °IVOR TH. LAM INSTAULD ffr OffoffeAll- COARRACTOR ( EXTERIOR. ELEVATION ALE: /4 • 6...ato..0••• EASTIEK is, 3 CaffoM Inffraffr- c-OLCR Wert A• SLAM" GrO.C. MK SAMS le-.0•13 AL.,AVA DOO• ••,,AL ZOLA OWE) fl Mae N. ,RIMO.L.. CLIMIBIX.NO SYN. WA:M. REM •A4AA413.A8A tff .14ffrA1-= Or aLAO41. Offilla•CTOR WIN • 11.1.4NATI, •••••• SAE, et roil f..t. 1•2•312 TO ATT....MT OffrA...... 'mem] gssua KCISfr IA_AAAAik •• 4•53•Jitte •CO. so3 00T04 ■•• COP PLASHINS. 00- %V CAA fn.A3.04. GILO• •130 C.,) SG ALE, /4 AU004.11• 0001 410 !COOR MAO 1171SIMED Tf2M.P. EXTERIOR ELEVATION 111••••••••••••••••••••••••••••11.. 11•11-111•M • Riailgralt MMM M • 111•••11111•111• • IMO 111111•A It • IHISSIBOL•11111/1111114•111B oslasts sontassas mu ma warm spa , 61_ASM GOAO 0.4. 5140.7 X.O.M.. 7,7.1 COLOR 'MM. KrSE X ITCO• •• A.A.1.2 AS ervo•el 00410 1000 AO. 13.00.•ff •,'ff. IOS, &CR 0010 0040400 COLOR ONTO4 ELMS. 4•■•••■••••■•••• A• • • M • m • s • • N • m ••••••A■■•■ ••••••■■S••• T•A 11 aII •m m • • mmussammo rn••••••••••••■••msim11•• Ili•••••••••••••• MMMMM •••••••••••••••••1111• IP 1 .0•42. TOP Cr ?AWL,. 210,0,1 O• 30-4. TO• SY03.16 04- BOTTOM Or IWO.* st.Azos =NG rniC, 3 O,XXOIrS EXPOS.Rer. •LA..7•4. •MiA• SAM—, .0r0 EA" 71441 rfeTO4 40.04 00714 NI. HOE X ,• MEP Pff/E.4.5 • rffsmut ANSLE As SALM 011M. SOlff•Ot 54.A= 4014 510. loans•A•X 6,ASNES COLOR "GR.' ••••CTT REV (7\ EXTERIOR icILEVATION V4" 'NO' OR BLOC< AL.00.13.EVATON RECEIVED I A PR 4 2000 CITY OF LINO LAKES ISPIWO405 PAVANS B612 CURB ad SIMER C. SLAB AT SID9V4K CZEXTIC% COWALTED GRANIAR FILL (;-\ B612 CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL ECALE. 9/4' P347241121SPAVINIS BbI2 OURS ad WTTER FEYO3D - AS OCCLR5 HO. wir mae risiso La MAX SWPE - SEE PLM COW/3CW 6RAMAR FILL (;-A. SLOPED RAMP DETAIL ..ALE. 5/4 • (7'\ SIDEWALK GO NTROL JOINT kos_A_51) SCALE. I -I/2' • l'-0" - III II II 1 V2' M3E-M2 LDED COMPRIESIELE FILLER 11'&o N JOINT - PRCMDE la RADIUS • JOINT - If? RETWORGINS HMS- STOF ISA NOE OF PILLER COTE 51,38 PUN 6.316 CO3IPACTIV 6RANLLAR FILL • . 1 11— 1 AS REGV 1 I 1 11 (7's\ SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT j51 SCALE. I-1/2' • ILO" PAINT EL7 14G L060 SCALE 1/4' • P-O' 21st AVENUE SOUTH w 0 NORTHERN LIGHTS BOULEVARD DECORATIVE COURTI-16HT FARKINS LOT ISTRIPIN9 MID DIREC.110NAL A0)- SEE SFr. TI AFC, ORAWINS SPECS. FOR REQUIREMENTS. 4' CONCRETE SIDE- AALK C.J. AND EXPANSION JOINTS - SEE DETAILS THIS SHT. EXTERIOR LOT L.I&HT POLE AND EASE- SEE ELECTRICAL PASS. POR L16347 LEVEL REQUIREMENTS AND GUANTITY SITE PLAN NOTES. THE SURVEY INFORMATION FOR THIS SITE WAS TAKEN PROM A SURVEY PREPARED BY METRO LANA SURVEYINS. REPER TO CIVIL DRAMIN65 FOR 1111LITY, &RATANS AND DRAINASE INFORMATION. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR REQUIRED INFORMATION. REFER TO T-I SHEET FOR BELERAL NOTES APO DETAILS. (-7- SITE FEASIBILITY jSI SCALE. I" • 10-0" PL = 225.01 g s 5=1*, 52, 51" ri PARKIN& STALLS = 22 STALLS LOT GROSS AREA = 21,225.20 30% GREEN AREA (REOUIREP) PLAN sREEN AREA = 1045.4141 (5-7% PRoVIPED) "AMOCO" HIGHWAY SIN YJ 12o LOGOS VERIFY LOCATION — .._.._..._ PL = 130.01" 0 N 00 °, 24r, 20° E tJ c 0 a 2 z 0 g 1 SAN. 6c I — T • CURB AND GUTTER BY OTHERS it NORTHE N LIGHTS gOULEVARDPIP'V' w w w W W L w --w ---w —w —w —w ==.1::.......••=====...."=============.=====.=======•■ IRON PIPE I I i PH. PED. SETBACK I I 3C.5' z N 89•52'51' E 225.01' r-- _ . .... .... . OEM OMAN 0 MAW OMAN • WNW AMMO 0 NOMA WAND 0 UMM, WANE 0 NANO DEW, 0 MONO ONO, 0 WINO NNW 0 WOWS MANN 0 •■■••■ OWES 0 30' IMAM • ANON • •■•• S SANITARY SEWER SERVICE w —w —w •—w w —w 10' TO FACE TYPICAL PIPE ,.....„:: ..... . . ...,. .• . . . . ... . ....- ---.. . IRON --Ii— • INWO •■• • •N•M MOM • ANEW OW10 • ■/* INI■ • W.• I■■ • 16' i 1. IRON PIPE MN. L °CLEAN OUT • co 18' • CLEAN OUT 24' 1LL 0 0 18' 18' 24' 4.5' TO FACE 0 18' 11, r WATER SERVICE 20' ---] i ilr 1 1 i 1 10' • ■••• wow • al■ •■ • •■■ wmm■ • ■■■ •••■ • M•••• won, • imm• •■• • •••••• am.; • .•■■ • •■•■ ••■ • am• moo • mim ■■• • .■ • •••,, • • ••••. • •■•••■ wow • WIMP INNW • WNW .••• • OINW *NNW • IMW IMAD • =WEI W•NID • ONMO ■•■ • MEW •AWID • MONA WNW • MA= N 89'52'51' E 225.01' LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED P RC/PFRTY CORNER SANITARY SEVER jfATERMAIN >GATE VALVE SANITARY MANHOLE PHONE PED CURB AND GUTTER CLEAN OUT IRON PiPE —w w —w —w VG. G.V. SAN. MH. 0 PH. PED. 0 CLEAN OUT NOTES IRON PIPE 1. PROPOSED PAVEMENT DESIGN IN ALL NEAS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS 4' ernartecus 7' CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 12 GRANULAR SUBBASE 2. WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 6' DIP., SANITARY SLIER SERVICE SHALL BE r PVC LAM AT 1/4'/FOOT. 3. CONCRETE PADS B DRIVE THRU SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS FOLLOWS r REINFORCED CONCRETE 1' CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 12 GRANULAR SUBBASE 4. CONCRETE SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS FOLLOWS: r CCNCRETE r CLASS 5 AGATE BASE & ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT COVERED BY BUILDING. PANEMENTS, OR SIDEWALKS SHALL BE co MET) NTH 4' TOPSOIL AND SODDED. MAR 1 3 2000 CI >- m 1 z z wo 5 P EL M o 0. 8v) w Z EL° 0 0 ijcnt e Z a- w 6 zgl w Z 0 5 Et W 0 z ••- •-r", .• c) z E—■ L=4 z z SHEET NO. A • • CU C7) LE") Q) [*7 fD 0 01 • CC C.7 CC CL 0 J '1+7X.0473 isal PIPE as MM OIL ,r COM NORTHEFN UGHTS g0ULEVAR W HOPE • 1.0011_1 _ 'n.Aato. G.V. COARSE FILTER ROCK BERM -afire — —zr —906 — _ _ PIPE 905_ 'n.aarn- d i N i FF ■007.0 I� J 906.4 UON NOTES ▪ at ipt / 7/1).0047 LE�7.6 'n...araz I 1. CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE AND EROSON CONTROL FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PR/OR TO ANY WORK BEONN6 0 ON TIE STE. 2. AT 1915 TIME THERE IS NOT STORM SEWER N EITHER 21ST AVENUE 0R NORTHERN UGHTS BOULEVARD. ACOORONO TO THE CITY ENGHEERINO STAFF THERE IS STORM SEWER PLANNED FOR 21ST AVENUE N TFE SUMMER OF 2000. HOWEVER THERE ME NO PLANS AVAILABLE AT MS DATE DIRECTION OF STORM SEWER OUT OF CATCH BASIN fi MAY NEM TO BE REALIGNED. 3. LOCATION OF UTWRES ARE APPROXIMATE. THERE MAY BE OTTER MIMES THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PUN. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL FOR LOCATES. -7 '5.441.17 - -904_ _- — 905• % 906 _ ' 'bwm< 1101110N NMI ♦SOL WIRING /5 ro sca:Viign HR 'CLAWS, PIPE '5..6144 LOCATION OF CATCH BASIN (CENTER OF BOX) 2' C A CASTING TO BE NEENAH R- 3067 -V OR EQUAL A B C PRECAST 5' TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION 2 ADJUSTING RINGS' 2 MINIMUM 8 MAXIMUM CATCH BASIN 'r A WITH CASTING ASSEMBLY NOTE: CONSTRUCT BENCH TO CENTERUNE OF PIPE. SLOPE FROM C.B. WALL TO PIPE CENTERUNE 'u.v'.ae '5.+61.47 WOOD POSTS TO MIN. 4' LONG WITH 2' MINIMUM DEEP IN GROUND. 2L II� SAN. MH. -431.04.. -3 0 MAXf- (TYP.) v. 3:1 SIDE /SLOPES TYPICAL EROSION TROL FFENCE PLAN VIEW _I3' 2' SECTION A -A 6:1 COARSE FILTER ROCK BERM MINIMUM 14 GAGE HIRE REQUIRED FOLD FABRIC 3' OVER THE WARE AND STAPLE OR PLACE WIRE RINGS ON 12' C.C. EXCAVATE A TRENCH A MINIMUM OF 4' WIDE AND 8' DEEP TO BURY AND ANCHOR THE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND COMPACT TRENCH WITH EXCAVATED SOIL. ATTACH THE FABRIC TO THE POSTS WITH WIRE STAPLES OR WOODEN LATH AND NAILS. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BACKFILL AND COMPACT TRENCH WITH EXCAVATED SOIL • SILT FENCE DETAIL R Cva 0 0 1- SHEET DESCRIPTION • W O 0 z M 41) zW W , �w SHEET NO. z EQUIPMENT PLAN SCALE. I/4' = ILO. PLAT t4 H L IN6 PLAN SGALE. I/4' • 11-00 V1ViI 1 RE el-Lfiie• TANDIN6 TABLE: PEDESTAL AND BASE TABLE TOP TABLE EDGE FREESTANDING CHAIR, SILVER VEIN WILSONART, *4612 -40 SPFXTRUM RIBBED CHROME TRASH RECEPTACLE/CONDIMENT BAR MAN. 44IL50NART 64612 -40 SPEKTRUM GauNTi i : TOPS WIL.SONART 8461248 5PEKTRUM BASE CABINET WIL50NART 84612 -40 SPEKTR.104 15112J1FIKINT PLAN NOTES 1) 50PT5@NE MIX LINES 4461E TO G0144LY WITH L0CN. HEALTH DEPARTMENT REGPIRE•EWTS. OM.451/5C. SMALL VERITY TH05E 1®OWREMENT5 PRIOR TO 1115TAL ATON 2) WATER LINE KIT. 6• FLEXIBLE GONSLTON PROM GOLD WATER SUPPLY 'TO DOPISE VE TENSEv R OR DIP STANP, IT TALL>m DY 111.1.045100 GONtTRAoTOR 5) 91Nt AND DRAN GOBI POTION ARE INTECARAL PART of DIP STAND (9W1 PRE-50T IN STAND). 4) FALDer 6 PROVIceo BY OPEC* PART CP DIP STAND 4 BLIZZARD TAEYC. PUBES* TO MOUNT FARKET AND GO4I1ECT 6' I9.EXIBLE WATERLINE KIT (PROVIDED) TO WATER SUPPLY. SorT EcIO GONNTION A LINES MON E06 -N -eox TO DRINK READS (PLO•10456 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DRINK SYSTEM (DRINK MAD ICE MAKER 6) THIS UNLIT *1 5 TOD GOMMMOLI S AND TAO BEATER MOR7RS. NpTGR BARREL R. GOMFTSer 16 206Y, _ S/b 2ritaAn ICAEL �.R�1 ®) 1B 306Y, 9•, 2HP. (206Y SEA, BARREL •2. G. 90 7111!. (2ObV7 Sg• d.LAGTRIGAL fa>:GLRIID 0 15 NOTES. ) •BTOEL•N6• 5CrreeN' t 44•64411103 ARE OPPINAL M LID) OF 'DUKE. sop-mama MAGHIIt31P •STO6LTIN6• MAGHINJD ARE ORDEI®, 746* TIC CORRECT MIX MUMPS, WATER LINE KITS AND RE0147T6 , _ KITS HOT ALSO DE ORDER2D, COORDINATE KIN YOUR nor EWIPN4CM COORDMATOR B) THIS race OF EGWPMENT REWIRES A 6REAK -M PEVCO OF SEVERAL DAYS RUNNIN5 TIME (f •R.0P1. T MIX N9.5T BE AVALIAESEL MARINE TNIE sTART-Ur AND Pre TWIN& OF THIS MACHINE. TIE 19•ANOIN6CE AG010PLBD658. THAT RE/ERE ACCEPTS THE RESPO4450LLTY FOR Tie FINAL SO GALLED, rite-TUNAS OF THE EWIPMENT. THE PRANcHECE 5 ARAM THAT THIS MAY RISPUIRE THE HARING OF LOCAL TRADE NERVICED. THE FRANCHISEE 19 RECOMMENDED TO EMPLOY A WALIFIED RE'RISERATION COMPANY TO FINE TUNE THE SOFT SERVE MACAMIE, 5)ALIFIGATONCS RGLUDE GERTFIED ?SERVICE TRASEN6 THRU SOFT SERVE MANPA TLRER (DUKE / 5TOH_T14 6) OR PAST WORKING KN oyteDe5 AND TROL01,I2314OOTIN6 OF THIS Er2)IPNBNT. 1) 5N3F TO BE MOMTBD • 54' APF TO SJIPAGE 6) GENERAL CONRACTOR TO GLYRRDINA7E MTN OWNER ON SHIPNT3tT AND DE3MBRT DAMES FOR ALL EQUIPMET4T. 4) SYSTEM INCLUDES. COOL AR {R!R IM011NL1ED ON! MTPORM ABOVE) 6 6NJAN6 OF GLYCOL, 5/15.11.1151145, RUDATFX 6*LATON, ABLATION TAPER ALL N.MR7' HARDWARE PIECES. 10) P✓flCIRCUJITN6 6Y5704 ROOT MQ.RTID OR 9S 01611179 E, r, 02 t A2 TOR SONVIC1E5 81520. 11) CONTACT ID[t CGiMR•Dt7 D•ARTMBNT TO ORDER SIGN FACES, REVIEW 6T1ERARKI146 PLAN (BY OTHERS) TOR MARE OP 516449, LAOATION AND MASSAGE MESSAGE CHOIGBSI 4- BITER / ENTER -R / ENTER / PRIVETNR) / EXIT / Pw1G0NE / THAW Vol / DD NOT ENTER 12) 10' -O•X 14b• 578-IN GOOIER / FREEZER GOF181NATION 00X (6' X10' KIP. 6' X 10' WIG). IS) NEW 5YSTEM (702000) PULL BRAZIER T SOME 19) - ID' 44085 (2) - 27' WIDE PLUS ED 76110 AND Mil. KIWI' PKG. 14) DROP -IN 5)NC. (EAGLE •,D1-10 -14-40 1/2-1, TO MCL10E 044)057 1 1/2• PO. 04/ DRAIN BASKET 4 MGMT046 HARDWARE 16) BY 00•ER LOCALLY, INSTALLED Bf 6EYDRAL CONTRACTOR YERIPY LOGA,TON AND INSTALLATION R09)ISEM415. 16) MARAJQ SAND 5101 BY OMCR THRU IDS, INSTALLED BY 60.- PACKAGE COWIBT9 00 maims BRAG41 1151644 CAN A59ENTLY (ILLUMINATED) AND 5•44 FAGas, NOTE. DIE TO LOCAL 616N RLSTUOTON 61•44 04.0E OPI10N4 EXIST, VERIFY AND COORDINATE TV 100 EOUITFIRT DE'Y. PRIOR TO ORDERING. IT) 61)1101 M 516* 0K64 GON615TN6 OF A *SLADE 6160 (ROOD MOUNTED), 0045/1000 51644 (POLE MOUNTED), TRIANGLE SIGN (ROLE MOUNTED), 51•44 PYLON POLE AND POLE ANCHOR O0-T6. NOTE. PYLON POIt Y{/ MOU*760 516145 ARE RDE11514DGi4T OP B )4.0446 STRUCTURE. REFER TO PLANS FOR TOOTING REM (WEBS AND LOCATION I6) 84• PGDED UPAGTORY) 6N.L6 0055 WITH ED G.1PS. W LADDER SHALL BE 'OSHA' APPROVED AND or ADffiYATE maw TO REACH *16H el$VINi6. 20) MSC BONED I6 08m/Om WITH A SPEAKER PORT 46 A 6TA0DARD, MENU B OARD 457H I1E65RAL SPEAKER 16 AN OPTION 000RDINATE rOADATION AB RKi)INto, (ERR TO DIGt7 T-1. 21) WALL 5RAPHO. GRAPHIC MATERIAL 16 'SCOTGPRINT' 514464.6 APPLICATION MATERIAL ( SIMILAR TO CONTACT PAPER). A 14104.04 Or 14'40 PEOPLE ARE TO BE UF1E0 TO ITLSTAU- 6(4!14108. INSTALLERS' ALL DB OP 44I611 0)41.1TY CAPER HAN16ERS OR A PROFH8610NAL '5GOTGFPRRt1' A8PI.IGA.T7R (vR800MNENDEp). INSTAA.lAT1oN 144 STRWTON9 WILL BE PROVIDED 44111 6RATNGS AND 844' .L 6E F011DP® TO GREAT A HIGH WALITY IN9TALLAT70N FOR EXAYT 6614.10110. GONIFISURATON AND MOIMTI1.6 PETAL-15 CONTACT I22I.1.5 NBRG44NDI5IN6 SPECIALIST Al' *617/150 -04TH. 04 to 1 0 C • 0 00 D4fl 4002 aT D1441404 20 2 Coon 5',40' 4*0 .) • 01572 common Powwow. co eo • 405. CLAY • caP D611U11146CT54) 614TH* MOVIE bar 044.40 WAD. -Raw 4•5445 5061 en ITT nB 61'(04100 RN oTteR/IRJNNY ,. ' 02 AND PETALLED SY DBERAL GONTRAGTOR Mole 00.0601 WA 6.02:414 DOODY 100!6 MGM. 4 M 4. 6M K u 2 20 5507 2T SDI 2a 2c2 2 aW 204 29 970 1 240 I � DR DM 120 2s 54 70 Al 127 26 24 224 M 44. 444 4M 4M 4K MT 44 414 410 1 � 40 AGI 402 644 DAD w *4 04 I 2 •A TOT. G4lIG} 11114124 • Tot PW <JlII1r 4ncn61e.1' ADDS Awe 4415_ ••••••4 NLK 226112214 20 *TAW 6) • 6407 LAD XO O.IS1q 5/044440 was COG 1.4 12641 T16U 4aNr0 104144 HR•a' N! 6114 Gs GUM 150* IMTM DPW LID 140.aB4 GT. *0 • 079 • a.Y 0.604004 771.4.44 c4wrew *Yal4Ol1DM 0414 14216214 MC, 6411Mak • 00 007 1.1,1!1 carts rwlme 9,4'.444 44.4441.4 P.T. 7.3047 1 DA6'6* 0016.IDt 144 PA•• •cam 1149 1416611Y MADAM X 00' E6. Poltl. 4*4*2 wM 104558 000 00 74044 00 06 00 100 00 00 L'�R%1111111111•111115/ :1615 1X151 441.611 010100 soon 41 004040 /GCO6P•A 2261 44 4•0004 00 14221 721o0� 1ND DOLID 1504•4• • Y woo Wo 100145E ,bba1 Dove 1204 b/22 0150 441* Dd. 00 4• 01 WOWS 1010.22 100012 140006 W WALL *DX 451!0 44 1510 2 1N006141124. T4• M. 2a• 0114). n1® Dore 14 0061 TOP 140144 1541 MAW 8110 PAI4TOP MD •44 • Doom DAMS 442 • c4.. 514. rAK *AD • 444.11_1•44, 6 61110 L*M4Rrlblr • P4*04 4 DRAW MADAM Y W4¢ co4X5ER 65!45'we !0.10715 14.021 0.4 544E 44147444 4100 DOOR *AVM. 64.610 4'' • 1 om 6DQAU 160116 �00X 2' ▪ 614 GK 2' cAO X 4 oic ARA LT 24 X4'*01 1.0151.004 24' X 4' 4164007 0I10RL4 24 % 7 •456040• A6m46LY Ib X 4 7DU. ! •Y' 4. MSS MUG 1111.24.111 • C X4'URN•• 64.4 W X6' 44414 RAGA M X 4' 520,061.410041 2 X 4 •444- MRDAY a•' X 4' 00 M.*1MUal Y'K4'I14 root 1OIQI 41.0410 0578 PItI, • 4004.14640' • P/6 RI.TIHRIR4 I M Pao 46100M W A0 PI16 .4610..,. 4 1qA 4 10. AS AM AIM 440 D1NE87 54•NJ 4OAIm WI.1 for 4* 05T10N T'• D1' 00 . All O10 Dl. cll01.070 4eN D1. T10N4*iM OIM1 1146 PTO. POLO ADS MIA I MD e� tom 52 IR Da ODD Mr 04*14 re 4gee Goa 15 TP0 15 W eat IW 500 eppg 01 IDA W0 1114 WA WA W 4,404 660]0 MOW 00 QT.Y T 20000 WA 10▪ 14.24 loom IOKl2 100014 120. 10101 111100 10.006 0106 MMDR 100060 0146 01•4 1ADM 500000 102002 1442* MELD arm 001042 m 1 y'Xn Y 206 I 1145 Y 700 I 0/AT PMR'd•M 4X 905 VP 42 PART Get DX 00 05 .W1 T 5001 Y .404 Y 1441 T [AOTAOS4,01 UT U1' 154 •06' •M. APP 05 00 100 I A. PTT.ON W46* VOL1O Dl. 00 RIDE WI •W MAW. 000 D. m0 00 NW a •LADD. OY 5444* 14041LY OD T]O4 204/1 Wart Y • , DEA77E6 BGUPEENT N57 DROWN ON E2APN517 PLAN OUT PART OP EcUPIME 47 PAGIGA6E DUPPLI9 6Y OY*HR/TB4WT T RU IDS. 11072 1b72 b 40727 4077 4rne 44072 00041 00217 157244 61 fit EQUIPMENT 5-1 EOIJIPMENT PLAN / SCHEEDULE F-2 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS MECHANICAL M-1 WAG PLAN M-2 ,NAG SPECIFICATIONS ELECTRICAL 0-1 ELECTRICAL PLAN EM2 9PEGIFIGATIONS / PANEL SCHEDULES PLUM5ING P -I 511.I431N5 WATER AND WASTE PLAN P -2 P1.14481N6 DETAILS 4 19OMETRIGS ARCHITECTURAL A-I A -2 A-5 A-4 A-5 A-6 h -i A-8 FOUNDATION / FLOOR PLAN ROOF FRAMING / ROOF PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 5E .110N9 4 DETAILS SCHEDULES, 15- EVATTONS AND DETAILS SECTIONS AND DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL BPECIFICATION5 T -I TITLE SHEET A NS%e Ano / 4Tm MGlol. COLT a\ room, PATIO \ 9jI M' uMeleR L / \PATE UHF PCNDA 'TwN DSgtMTM PAM WOO POOwwTlON ere LlX,AL.T DRAM ens PLAN Pow AcT1ML fo:A6ON 910 ISwTY OF LOOM RIO NOM* \1/ KAY CLACK 0*1OM AJfIP11 G A'F,9." LYE! J6 OP 065 (t\ 6 • { 610104 M15.3ORMOMM NOT 49 M PART or INTO DO04eR Mau! ALL MNATb15 MS VON IR6SCT TO M Ammo M•IGMM•C or IOO'O. M amen, OMAAGIOR M TOIAtOT6 O 0711 . eNMSAYRY feA ISV6 common. MOM Issas nota-( RAO NHPR� 4 FOX *ATE Note • Ns•--ele NTT SITE PLAN TO S'-0" MOM #3UIL.PINS SCALE: I /6" • I' -0" F10% 20% 6• C.ONOWIE P1D, CONTACT OP6eR R66ARDIN6 IRtC OF 61911.7101 LOOP DETECTION SY5f!M REMOTE SPEAKER MEW BOARD aF MENU CO. LOCATION, N.TB. 5S' I19 Ka* WM. X Me OM ONU,m AT SLOTS FOR SW N 22. Ao1OR 50.TI 154'1..15 5T 6L� 6575 FOR DDV.eI! Pima ueeaMmM rONRMMNRm ROIL, ism a.••••• OD 17P.Aa44Ld NOIR GAMMON TO R®T OI OM MTLRem =SRa. MOO. MOO PAP. IIRECTIONAL 0 MENU $0ARD SIGN SELTION ®SECTION 62718 PLAN PAPIffie L IT IS TIE INTENT OF THIS DRAYUN6 TO PROVIDE INFORMATION R6.4TIN6 TO TIE 817E 70 5b' off PROM BUILDING. REFER TO DRAYUN66 PREPARED BY o11aN6 FOR INFORMATION 1000M401N6 SITE DEVELOPM37T 2 PARKINS LOT STRIPPING COLOR TO BE 9N614HAY MITE" OR 'SAFETY 1'0.L0?, HANDICAPPED STALL PIGTO6RAM GOWN PER LOo14- COM VERIFY. REFER TO PRO.IEGT SPEGIFIGATEAN SEE):T M1 4 A-0. S. PROVIDE PANTED (BLLC> 5AP5TY MILUN6 OP 1 I/2' DIA METAL 1UDIN6 I)'-4' LONG AND 5' -0• HIGH WITH (5) INTERMEDIATE Ho71Z0HTAL RAILS 4 (5) VERTICAL SUPPORT POSTS. mom INTO CoNC 7ETE. SE PROJECT 9PEGIFIGATI011 5H3T M7 4 A-0 FOR 'AWARD DOLE' PAINT 1'EGIF1GAT10N6. 4. CONCRETE CURBING B 6' MSDE AND ID' DES 9TRAI*Nf PROFILE WITH 6 E #0009 AEOV5 PARKINS SURAGE. 5. IV NDIGAPPED PARKINS OILY 51611, SEE DETAIL II/71, VERIPY LOCAL. CODE. 6. EXTEND WALK TO END OF PARKINS ROK 7. LA105GAPIN6 TO BE BY OVER, SEE PRO-MGT SPECIPIGATON9 SHEET A-7 4 A-6 5010 STOCO'ILL.IN6 4 KAMME T OF TOPSOIL TO BE POSED FROM EXCAVATION D. 10'-4' 14160 CORPOS4TED FETAL PENCE ENCLOSURE MUM V1ERTICAL 6X6 0IPPORT POSES 41-0' OG. • foRIZO4TN- 2X4 SUPPORTS AT TOP, PEDDLE 9410 BOTTOM. !CORE VERTICAL. SUFS17RT9 9470 CONC. 64.019ON. FENCE ENCLOSURE GATE 5 NIRO NMOIG•PPED PARKING PLAN TO SE USED AS AN ILLUSTRATIVE S.0 TO 511E 94105011.9 CONTRACTOR. FINAL SITE AND GRADING 0 6UME4T TO BE COMPLETED LOCAL SITE E761N ®/EY65 R TO SN4L 611E PLAN FOR PARKING LOCATION AND COM'IOURATON. 65- U MTJITIa1 PIRP 0184 LOOP A /MGM 1,•• MOH OAR GOl1ERm IN MGM or I 465 PLOT OR MEIa0ARD OU LOOP WOAD R INSTM.LSD 0' TO B• beat T1! 1OrPACi Q 8CPA16 4P MAX r 00.84. NO1°1P NATALLID M ...MALT, 0ov5R LOOP PITH MEN P SOIL aR 6410 TO MROTGT PROM HOT A MALT. 5) Gd4CGT LGOP To IA• 1001101WT 5Tm® 1P M 0•[M®t MST OR Me4654RD. 4) HIT! MOT OR R6IPORCIOIS4T M GONORTle 01OtlD 11e GOT MAY PROM Pe IMMTR OP LOOP A MOSIIM O' 4•. 5/ ALL LOIMOGT01MAlp •69.10215 TO LOOP MOM Met! LOOP INDUCTION SECTION N.TS. rev 50.it0 NouStle DRa01 Mee IT R 01T01N'IL men>RAM NOD MAIM COMM • OR ITROOI OMT P efieRnet *WOO eMS *CAL Neu OOAmT / - 0210197 TO 60144. �- 4401754 • ••4100 MOON • P•03•010412 LOOP, MMOCIIG LAO 01001,ON 045155 00'%10'X6• COMPETE PAD 1.00P INDUCTION ISO C N.TS. •o• 4'O• X x1:11- IT ISM INTENT OF TAE MARINES AND B FECIROATION4 TO GONVEt' TIE DE910N OF AN INTERNATIONAL DAIRY EZE N BUILDING. THE OMEN TENANT 15 ADVISED 10 HAVE A SOILS INJI3TI5A- TION PERFORMED AND A REPORT 6E18RATED BY A LICENSED PROFE50IOW.L MAKING TRECOMISOATIONS FAR 50011146/PGUO- ATION MIEN AND 5ITU41N019 PARKING COMPOSITION TH15 DOGA0INT SIUALL. BECOME PART OF THE CONTRACT GA'611 465041 DOCUMENTS. ASSUMPTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE RE4UARDIN5 THE SOIL MARIN6 CAPACITY AND THE BUILDING 50011+46 I'A9OATON DEMON AND NOTED ON THE DRA/RI OS (BHT. A-) AND M THE PRO.EGT � MAY BE NECESSARY PRP�M.1' OF 501L7TE51' STATE ORS 60NTT OOD BS. IT 5IWl EE THE RE.PONSIBILI1Y OF 716 1911AN01.1666 Ado N16 CONTRACTORS TO VBRIPY THESE 4S4LMP)I0N6. R IS ALA THE P•R.AN:145M A0 H15 CONTRACTORS 005ONSIBILr1YY TO NNE NELE BART REVISIONS TO THE dUL.D1N6 STRUCTURE AND ME PARKING LOT DESON. ALL IN6CE9ARY IN'ORMATON TO BE NOTE ON DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY THE OYQBtl/TENAN15 LOCAL CIVIL/ STRUCTURAL EN6INEE RING FIRM. TO INCLLOE FINAL 5175 AND GRADIN9 PLAN DOCUMENTS. THEE CONTRACT 00649554(5465 DESIGNED TO MS'T THE RE- oune ECT5 FOR THE 5TATE OF MINIE5OTA AND THE UNIFORM BULL91N6 CODE OW.Y. R SHALL BE TIE RP3P016®11.177 Ac THE FRAYA49E 410 HIS CONTRACTOR TO 04.6441E T TEE DOG - MEWS TO THE PROPER 6OVHR111N9 ARENG11119 FOR THEIR REVISE AND MAKE ALL NECESSARY 44DIFTCATIONB OR REVISIONS. 16NN, SERVE 105 AND RICH AM TO REMAIN THE PROPERTY Or INTERNATIONAL 00,4. /AND, IDCNA,DMMESOTA 164511. 707 AT 1505 hCIRO MARI W6, PROP(527Y OP INTERNATIONAL DAIRY GLEEN, HOT TO BE COPIED IN ANY MANNER PUTCO' WRITTEN APPROVAL O` I9A. IP CONSTRUCTION IS NOT 5EOUN WITNN 6 MONTHS OF DATE MARKED NEREDN PRINT SET 15 TO BE CONSIDERED OBSOLE E AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT 6044ffi405. CONTACT 710 5N61N®eINS DEPARTMENT OP IDS. MR 114617610TIO Ni OX DISPOSITION OP THIS PRINT SET. DATE OF ISSUE: PRINT SET NO.. INTERNATIONAL DART WE IL WAMS TO 116660 YOU THAT AS AN 04095 0R OTENRTOR 00 A REST/'U44NT, YOU HAVE ORTAIN OBLNATOIS5 U00R TIE RYMMLYP1 ORO 4TDMO4N9 PITH 016A611.0 1M ACT. ATTACK FOR YORK 166 6 A GOAT OF AMEICA6 MITI DB/DILITES ACT. ANVERS 5DR 715 FOOD 6®R/ICE AERATOR KNCN 15 A .1049E PLE 4641)OI OF TIE U15 DEAR1MBM OF JSTCe 44p M NATIONAL RESTAURANT PO0OCATOL M OUR PRo0000 TOl MUTE SOME 5ABIG IIPCMSATOH AWE c0MPLIM6E MBTN TIC AMERICANS 4NH OI4ASNLRRS ACT Bo114 FOR 8561145 R°STNIRANTS AND FOR 00(441RANTS THAT 1L( COI6TR,0TFO OR 1@00119. P R 11NOLVSD IN /S4 f0L� teMODLyM6, YOU SMOND DISCLE614TH YOUR ARC.INTBGT CORRAL701.5 Alp LEGAL 00400. YOU* AS_6A1101LS UNDER RE AMISEGANI NTH DI5ABILITB ACT TO MA2 SUM TOUR ROTALRA/T 15 IN PULL COMRJMGE MOTH TIC I.AM1. YOU AL50 Ile RRRA. 14100#4 ID ACM STA/WA RDLP R /AT CONIMUCC10N � GN 15 4LTU RAT1A6. To) GAIN 05TAN A COPY MY MOMS. COMP1JIdY,E� 4 1RAMPDRTATON DA46 1111 - ETT1. DT. NU'i, UNITE SO (2019 44 ONDO.PVIITo 6.4. 105 4TDWATONAL DAIRY NEEL ENE. c#t41OT HAVE AVAILABLE TD K ALL oP M SFSGIFO OETAL5 RELATI06 TO YOUR RESTAURANT o6OtAT4 41 IT GA DoT EE9565CETHHAT TOSRR R6TANAI0T 0OHS.IB. 660.940E OF ME ORWOK' MIKNT (0 BY.WRA6ID ALL or P1IF 100th TO MAINTAIN TCOI1PLI A 444181STEMG. 19640446 N1M DISABUTE9 ALT. 66Err INDEX INJILDIN6 CLASS CONSTRUCTION TYPE, FIVE N OCCUPANCY GROUP. 5-2 BUILDING GROSS AREA. 1,655 5Q. Ft'. HEI614T OF BUILDING: 18' -0' II/ M E M O R A N D U M 41111 DNR Forestry / 1200 Warner Road / St. Paul, MN 55106 (651) 772 -7562 / FAX: (651) 772 -7599 / E -mail: peggy.sand@dnr.state.mn.us 2000 January 10, 1-999 To: Interested Cities and Townships in Anoka County/Northern Washington County From: Peggy Sand Metro Region Forestry Manager • Re: Opportunity to Collaborate on Wildland -Urban Interface Project All communities are facing significant challenges in accommodating new development while conserving critical resources. This situation is complicated by the existence of many types of environmental review which are not always well integrated nor as timely as they could be. Now, on top of that we're hearing about "smart growth" and wondering how all that relates. In response, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Metro Region is starting a new effort aimed at providing more useful and better integrated assistance to local governments and landowners dealing with development on the urban fringe (also called the "wildland -urban interface). As we develop and refine our ways of providing guidance and assistance, we would like to work with selected local units to determine the best ways to work together. For that purpose, we are looking for local units of government to become our partners in a new Wildland- Urban Interface project. We are able to do this project at this time because we are receiving a modest grant from the USDA Forest Service to cover some expenses for a project called "Integrating Natural Resource Guidance to Enhance Smart Growth in Wildland -Urban Interface Communities ". Thus, while we are doing the project, we will provide some real, hands -on assistance and resources to our partners. In particular, we would like to partner with local units who are interested in working with us over the next 18 months to address habitat/woodland preservation, wildfire prevention, forest health, greenways, natural resources management, water quality, smart growth, and related issues. The project consists of three parts (each to deal with these all of these issues): PART 1. We will work with 1 or 2 local units (a township or city) to: a) complete a GIS -based natural resource inventory (including detailed land cover mapping and a wildfire risk assessment), b) evaluate the local unit's policies, plans, etc. related to natural resources, and c) develop recommendations on how to improve natural resource - related smart growth and management. PART-2. We will work with a specific landowner or developer (along with the local unit) to create a model subdivision plan which integrates wise natural resource planning, smart growth principles, and potential conservation easements. PART 3. A cooperative team will oversee the development, printing, and distribution (including on the DNR website) of a guidebook to assist small acreage landowners (typically 2 to 20 acres) in their resource management decisions. Work is just starting on this project. Please contact me soon if you are interested in being involved in • any parts of the project. WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE PROJECT "Integrating Natural Resource Guidance to Enhance Smart Growth , in Wildland-Urban Interface Communities" January 2000 - September 2001 Briefing Paper on Local Unit of Government - Development Collaboration The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (with support from the USDA Forest Service) is kicking off a new project called the "Wildland Urban Interface" project. This project has two primary parts - one working with local units of government and the other to develop a guidebook for landowners to better manage their natural resources. This paper is on the first of these - a collaborative project with 1 or 2 local units. Background: Need & Response All communities are facing significant challenges in accommodating new development while conserving critical resources. This situation is complicated by the existence of many types of environmental review which are not always well integrated nor as timely as they could be. Now, on top of that we're hearing about "smart growth" and wondering how all that relates. In response, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is starting a new effort aimed at providing more useful and better integrated assistance to local governments and landowners dealing with development on the urban fringe (also called the "wildland -urban interface). As DNR develops and refines its ways of providing guidance and assistance, DNR Metro Region staff will collaborate with selected local units to determine the best ways to work together. This project is possible at this time because the DNR received a modest grant from the USDA Forest Service to cover some expenses for a project on "Integrating Natural Resource Guidance to Enhance Smart Growth in Wildland -Urban Interface Communities ". Thus, the DNR will provide some real, hands -on assistance and resources to 1 or 2 local units who are interested in working with the DNR over the next 18 months to address habitat/woodland preservation, wildfire, forest health, greenways, natural resources management, water quality, smart growth, and related issues. (See separate page on "Issues" for more complete list of the topics the DNR would like to address through this project.) Project Purpose & Scope The DNR (in cooperation with the Minnesota Land Trust) will be working collaboratively with ne or two cities (also referred to here as local units of government - LUG's) in creating land tvelopment and management tools which better incorporate natural resource conservation goals. itural resource assessment and policy /plans will be addressed at the "landscape" scale - 'ering the whole jurisdiction for each city. Another component of the project on subdivision gn is proposed to be done on.only 1 specific site and therefore can only be done with one An interdisciplinary team of DNR Metro Region staff will be contributing to the project. • • AGENDA ITEM VI. A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: April 12, 2000 TOPIC: Discussion: DNR Wildland Urban Interface Program BACKGROUND Lino Lakes and the MN Dept. of Natural Resources (DNR) will be cooperating in a DNR - initiated program called the Wildland Urban Interface Program. The DNR's goal is to assist local governments with preserving habitat and woodland, water quality, and other natural resources. The DNR has asked Lino Lakes and Hugo to be the two cities to participate. The Lino Lakes City Council approved the attached resolution on March 13. However, the Council wanted to ensure that both the Environmental Board and the P & Z had a look at the program and were comfortable with it. The issue relative to the P & Z was the potential for changes to our ordinances and planning and zoning methods. • There are three parts to the program: 1. Prepare a natural resource inventory, evaluate policies and plans, and offer recommendations to improve natural resourcepreservation. Since we already have an inventory, the DNR will be reviewing it and making suggestions for improvements. We have our Preservation Development program underway and we will continue to use it. The DNR may have suggestions on how to improve our methods. We are under no obligation to follow any recommendations from the DNR. 2. Work with a landowner on a development project to create a model for subdivisions that have less negative impact on the environment. This will occur in Hugo, but not in Lino Lakes. Our Preservation Development program already has taken this step. It is possible we can learn from the Hugo example. We are under no obligation to follow any recommendations from the DNR. 3. Develop a guidebook to assist small acreage landowners in resource management. This is something that we have been thinking of for some time, but have not had the time and resources to do. The DNR program gives us an opportunity to have the DNR do a large amount of the work, and we can build on it. • Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - 2 A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM CALLED "INTEGRATING NATURAL RESOURCE GUIDANCE TO ENHANCE SMART GROWTH IN WILDLAND -URBAN INTERFACE COMMUNITIES" WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has initiated a program called "Integrating Natural Resource Guidance To Enhance Smart Growth In Wildland- Urban Interface Communities ", and WHEREAS, The funding from this program is coming from the Department of Natural Resources and the U.S. Forest Service, and WHEREAS, The Project offers a good opportunity to enhance and complement the City of Lino Lakes Environmental Inventory and Management Plan, and WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is interested in working with The City of Lino Lakes and our neighboring City of Hugo. NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the City of Lino Lakes supports collaborative efforts of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources with the city of Lino Lakes Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this xxth day of , 2000 John Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk • • • • • Inventory and Assessment of Natural Resources (March - November 2000) • To be done for each participating city. • Also called ''a) Assessment" under the "1. Integrated Assessment & Policies @ Landscape (LUG) Scale" in the Forest Service funding proposal & work plan (copies in notebook). • Will include detailed land cover mapping (to 1 acre polygons) for each city's total geographic area (pending availability of additional matching funds, e.g. through LUG's, watershed district, Metro Greenways planning grant, and Minnesota ReLeaf community forest inventory grant program), • Will include some form of wildfire risk assessment, natural plant community and habitat inventory and assessment, forest health assessment, wetland classification (if needed), plus other assessments TBD • GIS -based data layers and maps of existing information and various assessments with accompanying narratives will be generated and provided to the city and other project cooperators /funders. • The inventory and assessments will be useful in focusing the rest of the project on the city's most critical and significant natural resource issues and opportunities. ,= 1valuation and Recommendations on Policies & Plans (April 2000 - Mar 2001) • To be done for each participating city. • Also called "b) Policies" and "c) Recommendations" under the "1. Integrated Assessment & Policies @.Landscape (LUG) Scale" in the Forest Service funding proposal & work plan (copies in notebook). All of the city's relevant policies, comprehensive plan chapters, ordinances, management plans and practices, etc. which relate to or affect natural resource resources could be addressed. Focus may be on one or more of these that are critical in land development and natural resource conservation and are under current consideration by the city. Which are covered will be based on the city's needs and, to a lesser degree, the DNR's goals. • Any vision statements, goals, etc. that the city has related to natural resource conservation could be a useful basis for the project. • A checklist will be developed by the DNR to use in a process of evaluating the effectiveness of the city's current policies etc. in conserving natural resources (and achieving natural resource- related smart growth concepts). • Some examples of sample model ordinance language and guidelines (including some on sustainable development and smart growth as well as natural resource protection) and other conservation tools will be compiled and offered to the city for consideration. • Recommendations will be developed on ideas and/or options for better integrating natural resource conservation and related smart growth concepts into existing city policies, plans, practices, etc. Subdivision Concept Plans (May 2000 - May 2001) • To be done only for one site (a whole proposed subdivision study site) in one city. • Also called "2. Integrated Development Plan @ Subdivision Scale" in the Forest Service funding proposal & work plan (copies in notebook). • • The DNR and the Minnesota Land Trust (MLT) would cooperate with the city and a landowner /developer who is interested in looking at options for natural resource conservation in their subdivision design and management and who is willing to work with the DNR/MLT in exploring conceptual design options. • Will include a more detailed natural resource inventory of the subdivision study site using the developer /landowner's site survey /basemap and the project's land cover mapping as a basis (with the nature of' the more detailed inventory based on the land cover mapping). • Guidelines for integrated smart growth and natural resource conservation in subdivision planning and design would be developed and agreed upon by all parties early in the process. • MLT would develop a series of alternative conceptual site plans which show a range of ways responding to the guidelines in the site layout and conservation areas. These conceptual plans would be created and revised through consultation with project partners. • One or more of these conceptual plans would be presented to a city board/commission as part of a discussion of potential revisions to the city's subdivision ordinance. • MLT/DNR would develop suggestions and/or•options for ongoing protection and management of natural resources on this subdivision site (e.g. conservation easement and forest management plan). • Will include exploration of how this subdivision could become part of the DNR's Neighborhood Wilds Program (for involving homeowner's in cooperative natural resource education and on- the - ground demonstration projects). Final Report (July - September 2001) A final project report documenting this process and key findings will be prepared and distributed to the Forest Service and all local partners. Requested City Commitment (preliminar y draft - 2/3/00) To be selected as a project city, the DNR would like the city to pass a resolution, memorandum of understanding, or take some official action in support of this project with the following provisions requested: • the city will provide DNR with a copy of any policies, ordinances, etc. to be considered in this project; • if needed, the city will allow project team members doing the natural resource assessment on to any city property and encourage other owners to also give their permission; • city staff and /or board/commission members be willing to meet periodically on the project; • DNR & other participants can periodically present project findings to a city board/ commission of the city's choosing); and • the city will make a good faith effort to consider and, where in the city's interest, to implement findings from the project. In addition, for the city to be selected as the location for the subdivision design part of the project, the DNR would like: • the city would provide to the DNR (and Minnesota Land Trust) the names of landowners and/or developers who may be interested in the participating in the project; • the city, the landowner /developer, and the DNR/MLT will concur that the proposed subdivision study site serves each of our purposes for this project; • the city is willing to be the DNR/MLT "client" on this project and participate in the process (e.g. in developing or reviewing guidelines and in project review) - but that this participation doesn't take the place of any official city review processes, nor does it commit the city to approve the subdivision; • • • the landowner /developer is interested in looking at options for natural resource conservation in a subdivision design and management and is willing to work with DN IZ/MLT in exploring conceptual design options; • the landowner /developer and/or city will provide an adequate scaled survey or basemap for the subdivision study site (preferably with 2' contour intervals); • the landowner /developer will provide funds for and/or have conducted a reasonably detailed natural resource inventory of the subdivision study site (this would build on the land cover mapping done by this project, and would preferably also include location and inventory of any rare, endangered, or threatened specie as well as significant trees and wetland delineation); • the landowner /developer will allow the DNR/MLT access to the site for natural resource assessment and planning purposes; • the city and landowner /developer understand that the conceptual designs generated through this project would not substitute for the professional engineering and design work that the developer would need in order to meet the city's subdivision requirements or for project implementation purposes; and • the city and /or landowner /developer will try to share the results of this project with any future planners, owners, managers, etc of the subdivision study site.