Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/14/2007 P&Z Packet• CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING • • Wednesday, February 14, 2007 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. SWEARING IN OF NEW BOARD MEMBERS III. ELECT CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 4, 2007 Special Work Session and January 10, 2007 Meeting VI. OPEN MIKE VII. ACTION ITEMS A. Final Plat for Pine Glen 2nd Addition — Paul Bengtson B. Variance to the arterial street setback for a garage addition, Susan Goepfert, 7300 Terra Court — Paul Bengtson C. PUBLIC HEARING for a Rezone to Planned Unit Development for a 17 -acre mixed -use development to be called Comforts of Home, located west of Hodgson Road and north of County Road J — Jeff Smyser D. PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit for a motor fuel station with a commercial car wash and Preliminary Plat, Holiday Stationstore, 7509 Lake Drive — Paul Bengtson VIII. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel IX. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4- minute limit • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice - Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES SPECIAL WORK SESSION DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT : January 4, 2007 6:33 P.M. 8:03 P.M. : Michael Hyden, Perry Laden, Robert Nelson, Brian Pogalz (Vice Chair), Rob Rafferty, Michael Root, Paul Tralle (Chair) : None : Jeff Smyser, Michael Grochala & Jim Studenski I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board Special Work Session to order at 6:33 p.m. on January 4, 2007. II. DISCUSSION ITEM: A. Master Planning Study - Hodgson Road and County Road J Staff clarified that the work session would not include review of any particular development applications. Mr. Smyser showed a brief power point presentation displaying critical points of the master plan study area. Mr. Smyser explained the existing sewer & water system and capacities, existing residential and commercial sites, natural resource areas, and current parcels and ownership within the study area. Mr. Smyser explained the need to determine the best possible access points and traffic circulation within the study area. He said that staff received the latest traffic study based on the master plan. He noted that a traffic signal is necessary at the intersection of Hodgson Road and County Road J. He explained that the proposed plan will not force existing businesses out and will provide potential for future businesses. Mr. Smyser explained that staff has been working with the Anoka County Highway Department to determine access points along Hodgson Road. He stated that the Highway Dept. has spacing guidelines along county roads. Mr. Smyser noted that the Highway Department recently informed staff that they would now consider a traffic signal if the access point is 180 feet north of the proposed location, which would allow for better development and traffic flow in the future. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board January 4, 2007 Page 2 Mr. Smyser explained the Comprehensive Land Use Amendment being proposed, which would include development objectives in the study. Board Members questioned the location of the traffic signal area now considered by the county. Mr. Smyser explained that possibly in the future they would allow a signal further south. Ms. Carolyn Krall of Landform pointed out that there is a list of criteria that must warrant a signal to be allowed at any location. Mr. Michael Grochala, Community Development Director, noted that the city should consider whether or not they want an additional traffic signal. Mr. Nelson asked if the access point was moved north 180 feet, could the "future" road remain a driveway until a road becomes necessary. Staff replied no. Staff pointed out that the existing owner could sell right -of -way to allow them to improve and expand their existing business. Mr. Grochala pointed out that ultimately Hodgson Road will become a four -lane divided highway. Ms. Krall described that the proposed access locations were derived according to the desires of the city council and benefit to the area properties. She reminded the board that one benefit of a master plan is to predetermine the location of roads to ensure that they will work best for all developable properties. Board members agreed that they should not make a decision based on a signal that may not occur. Mr. Root expressed that they should fit in the right amount of potential development but allow for the existing businesses to remain to exist. He said the goal should not be to cram as much development in as possible. Mr. Laden asked, according to the latest traffic study, if a big box user would be allowed without a signal. Mr. Smyser replied that a large grocery store would override the traffic limit Mr. Jim Studenski, City Engineer, pointed out that this area could not handle full development of commercial in the study area. Mr. Grochala pointed out that one of the hurdles was to figure out a balance between the east and west side to develop. Mr. Smyser stated that this neighborhood was guided to be a neighborhood district. Ms. Krall explained that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment would: 1) guide both sides of Hodgson Road for mixed use, which reinforces what they've been hearing from the community and allows for greater flexibility; 2) determine locations of roads, sewer, water & infrastructure; 3) set some quality guidelines, including standards to create a unique area with character, that are supported by community. Mr. Nelson asked staff if a signal would be warranted once the development is at full buildout. Mr. Smyser stated that full development itself would not warrant a light. Mr. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board January 4, 2007 Page 3 Smyser said that according to the traffic study, this development would work without a light. Mr. Nelson expressed concern that existing business owners can remain. Mr. Grochala said that the city needs to provide for a system that will benefit the greater need at lowest impact to property owners and expense. Mr. Tralle stated that the board should consider what the city wants and not cater to incoming development. Mr. Tralle commented that he is in favor of the plan. Ms. Krall explained the potential scenarios for the Ware Road / County Rd J intersection. City staff has discussed the proposed scenarios for the intersection of Ware Rd and Kent St. with Shoreview city staff. Shoreview staff supported and agreed with all proposed scenarios for these intersections. Mr. Nelson expressed concern about placing a road on the east side along the back side of an existing development. Ms. Krall explained the need to create flow between roadways without creating culdesacs, and the need for emergency access to all developments. Mr. Tralle suggested that the point of the master plan is to create flowage. Mr. Tralle informed work session attendees that comments would be taken at the regular P &Z Board Meeting on Wednesday, January 10. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:03 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant DRAFT MINUTES • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME `ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT : January 10, 2007 6:33 P.M. . 7:24 P.M. : Michael Hyden, Perry Laden, Robert Nelson, Brian Pogalz (Vice Chair), Rob Rafferty, Paul Tralle (Chair) : Michael Root STAFF PRESENT Paul Bengtson, Jeff Smyser & Jim Studenski I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. on January 10, 2007. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 13, 2006 Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to approve the December 13, 2006 Minutes without changes. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 4 - 0. Mr. Hyden abstained. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:35 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:36 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 - 0. V. ACTION ITEMS DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board January 10, 2007 Page 2 A. Amendment to the City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the Hodgson Road and County Road J Master Plan for the area around the intersection of CSAH 49 /County Road J Mr. Smyser presented the staff report. Mr. Smyser noted that the updated draft master plan included revisions on page 35 as well as removal of the big box alternative figure. Staff recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Mr. Smyser reminded the board that the plan was based on allowing existing businesses to remain. Mr. Nelson asked if the Brunn Brothers would require approval from the neighboring property owner in order to develop their property. Mr. Smyser stated that there are some interim possibilities of how they could develop. He stated that it is possible for a road to be constructed with plans for future connections. Mr. Tralle opened the opportunity for public comment. Mr. Wayne Brunn, owner of 10 acres on Ware Road and County road J, asked to be on record that they strongly oppose the location of the proposed road (near their property). He said it does not benefit them and they cannot use it. He said that properties with road frontage on both sides degrades the value and hinders the site planning. He also stated that their property is not in the MUSA but sewer & water is available and adjoining properties are within the MUSA. He asked the board to recommend that their property be added to the MUSA with the proposed Comp Plan Amendment. Mike Witham, 211 Woodridge Lane, spoke as a representative of residents on Woodridge Lane. He distributed a letter signed by a number of Woodridge Estates residents supporting the draft 49/J Master Plan. Mr. Witham read aloud the letter for the record, pointing out the benefits of the master plan. He stated that they agree that the master plan guides future development and that this is an opportunity to establish 49/J as a gateway to the city. Mr. Smyser summarized a letter that the city received from the city of Shoreview. He also corrected a statement that he made at the workshop regarding signalized intersections in the city of Shoreview. Mr. Tralle referred to the request by Mr. Brunn for MUSA. Mr. Smyser stated that this was not considered as part of the study. He explained that the city allocates MUSA as each development occurs and recommended that they do not vary from the system. Mr. Laden asked if MUSA allocation is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff replied that it is not specifically described in the Comp Plan, and that the city adopted their allocation policy in the subdivision ordinance. Mr. Nelson asked staff if there were safety concerns with police and fire regarding developing the Brunn property. Mr. Smyser replied that a fire access would be necessary on a temporary basis. Otherwise the city would require that a full size culdesac be built DRAFT MINUTES • • • • Planning & Zoning Board January 10, 2007 Page 3 in order for a fire truck to turn around, which is not necessarily a good long term solution for the developer because it could prevent units from being constructed. He added that the culdesac could be removed in the future and then additional lots could be created. Staff is trying hard to avoid creating one access to neighborhoods. Mr. Smyser clarified that the roads proposed on the Brunn property were hypothetical, and that it is the nature of the property, wetlands, etc. that creates the situation of what is possible on that property. Mr. Rafferty asked for confirmation that the board is not guaranteeing that property owners will be allowed variances to ordinance requirements in the future. Mr. Nelson commented that the proposal submitted by the Brunn Brothers would require setback variances in order to develop. Mr. Nelson stated that he thinks the master plan could adversely affect the Brunn property. Mr. Tralle reminded board members that the focus of the Master Plan is not to address individual properties and development. Mr. Laden commented that this plan will not create any undevelopable property. Instead it allows for development on all property. Mr. Hyden concurred. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the 49/J Master Plan as presented with the corrections made. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Mr. Nelson stated that he would like to see Kent St. the access point, otherwise he would be in favor of the plan. Mr. Rafferty appreciated the efforts of staff and board members and for the special work session. Mr. Pogalz concurred. Mr. Pogalz also appreciated the effort of the citizens that were in attendance. He reminded them that the P &Z Board makes recommendations to the City Council, but ultimately the City council will make the final decision. He thanked the city's consultants and the City of Shoreview. Mr. Laden expressed appreciation to staff, consultants, counties, cities, property owners, businesses, and residents for their involvement. He stated the plan is thorough and thinks it is a good plan. He also thanked everyone for their patience. He believes the plan is best for the city. He encouraged staff to consider the next area that could use a master plan. Motion carried 4 -1 (Mr. Nelson voting nay.) Staff noted that this item would go to the first Council Work Session in February and to the February 12 City Council Meeting. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board January 10, 2007 Page 4 Chair Tralle thanked the city's consultant Caroline Krall and city staff for all the work they have done. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. 2006 P &Z Action Year End Review Mr. Smyser stated that city staff provided them with a list of applications the Board considered and their votes taken in 2006. B. 2006 Growth Mr. Smyser distributed to the board some data on the number of building permits that were issued in 2006, noting that 89 building permits were issued. Mr. Smyser provided comparisons to the annual average. He included the number of lots that were approved for development broken down by year. He pointed out that the city allocated only 13 acres of MUSA reserve out of a possible 36 acres. Mr. Smyser explained that there were more units built than approved because some units had been approved in previous years. Chair and Board Members thanked the Woodridge neighborhood residents for attending the meeting, reminding them that it is important to stay involved and attend future meetings, and considered their involvement huge and asked them to continue. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:24 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant DRAFT MINUTES • • • • AGENDA ITEM 7.A. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: February 14, 2007 TOPIC: Final Plat Pine Glen Second Addition BACKGROUND 23 LLC. has applied for a final plat for the remaining portion of the residential property within the Pine Glen project area, which is located west of Lake Drive approximately 1,000 feet south of Main Street. ANALYSIS The final plat for the second addition is substantially conforming to that shown during the preliminary plat review completed and the final plat for the first addition. lithe final plat generally conforms to the approved preliminary plat layout as approved by the City Council on November 28, 2005; and the phasing plan that was revised during the review of the final plat for the first addition. The title commitments have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review, and they will be required to be approved prior to the item being heard by the City Council. All conditions of approval for the development have either been met with the first addition final plat and development agreement. A development agreement for this phase will be included with the plat when it goes before the City Council in March. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Pine Glen Second Addition. TTACHMENTS 1. Pine Glen Second Addition Final Plat received January 16, 2007. • PINE GLEN 2ND ADDITION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, 23, LLC., a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner and Landmark Community Bank, NA, a National Banking Association, mortgagee of the following described property situated in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, to wit: Outlots B, C, and 0, PINE GLEN, Anoka County, Minnesota. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as PINE GLEN 2ND ADDITION and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plot. CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 9, T31, R22. I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as PINE GLEN 2ND ADDITION; that this plat is a correct representation of the survey; that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown or will be placed as required by the local governmental unit; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no wetlands as defined in MS 505.02, Subd. 1, or public highway to be designated on said plat other than as shown. Blake L. Rivard, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19421 In witness whereof said 23, LLC., a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed STATE OF MINNESOTA by its proper officer this day of , 200 . COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by Blake L. Rivard, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License Number 19421. By: , Anthony J. Emmerich, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 , by Anthony J. Emmerich, as Chief Manager of 23, LLC., a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota. My Commission Expires In witness whereof said Landmark Community Bonk, N.A., a national Banking Association has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 200 . LANDMARK COMMUNITY BANK, N.A By Executive Vice President Kevin J. Whelan STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 by Kevin J. Whelan as Executive Vice President of Landmark Community Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association, on behalf of the association. Notary Public, County, Minnesota. My Commission Expires MIDWEST Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. Notary Public, County, Minnesota. My Commission Expires , 200 The foregoing plot of PINE GLEN 2ND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 200 . 1f applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA By: , Mayor By: , Clerk Checked and approved this day of , 200 By: , Anoka County Surveyor ,JAN 1 ;; 200 FILE COPY SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS • • / ,b / / i=s? / MIDWEST PINE GLEN 2ND ADDITION DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: II 5- I- - yl -5 10, 1 I r1 D BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT UNES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING REAR LOT UNES AND ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY UNES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. ` -NW Comer / Sec.9 -T31N -R22W Anoka County Cost Iron Monument J E' / 589 32'09 -E 328 50 - i / 44A • ` lip_,.UL , r - 116.D+L _ 7 / \\ 11 1 \\ 11 / ex `� 3 L a -- \ \\ 1 \ NOTES: FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTH UNE OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTER OF SEC.9 -T31N -R22W l5 ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N89'35'30 -W. O - DENOTES 1/2 INCH DIA. BY 14 INCH IN LENGTH IRON PIPE MONUMENT THAT WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR AFTER RECORDING OR SOONER AS SPECIFIED BY THE APPROVING LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNIT AND MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED °RLS 19421". • - DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND • - DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT GRAPHIC SCALE 60 0 40 80 160 , -North Line S1/2 NW1 /4 -NW1/4 Sec.9- T31N -R22W 1 1 419-1 \ \ 1 1,�, 2243.. \ 43442.1 )6_ -' 25:.51 0 tc. .`?5�0 25kR -,-34". BZ 5211.57 Li/ / rF o0 4 . :5 i21 9 ,,--5 1cr6, 9 p6 42 sDOao• i' 6 2 ', '�I �.. /r1 4=13 °37'47" C1 ` / o 39.45 _-'_- -- 1 R= 165.83 '+ / rya. 1 �k r 4 W 1 1 7 m %I a 0 , d 1: 1 o W U S6. ' ,:,G._ 34 289°32'09"E SCALE 18 FEET 1 inch = 80 feet -1- CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SEC. 9, T31, R22. N1/4 Comer - - -' Sec.9 -731N-R22W Anoka County Cost I Iron Monument 1334.52 S89 °2 S89 °28'49 "E 42.50 YlLDD _ 90.00 96.16 33p -W 150.53 / 30, .,'3 3.N 1297W -NB9 ;9'W- , Ng94S. SSp " - I ��° 31 A i BzBpO 5 n 6 Z 1.'11' 7 8 6��,0 h °o 1: O F ..c`/ ry // A 1 1 §i I 1 4--:,;,,,,..1 I , , ., 1'/ /:_ -', 23• / / L _ _J L_ _J L J L 49'E 356.95 - S89'28'49 "E - 254.45 � °.,r. 10.25 -- 4=60 Ole 6� </i 1 0 ,x �1G �R s6'} ,„ --3195224" '5.°. ue I 38, • : gg.4� o x 60 / / 1 I� \ >� N < ' �v �/ 1 ( - -- ie � \ / / al 151 h, 1 ate' / 1 ‹ \ \ 12 0. - I o, I / ,' 25.52 -� �� 4`` ps V / FI / e a....7,-..,.".:r., py 1.03'- N8 °35'30 "W 178.04-- // 37 . 2i m s 08 184.58 8 3 MS 11 r I I H I 6L - N�998�9 -W_ J 751- -135.0- - 7 v, I I I 4 alt ; 1 Is ..._.5_8.9:15. 101 _ J 03 180.85 D r a i n a g e o n d Wl8p6� W --]` ----.s 1&I 1 `36 9 ho" / / 1k -- 4// \1 ..,5,/ / 9Q4 ai -North Line S1/2 ' NE1 /4 -NWI /4 Sec.9 -T31N -R22W 117.47 i 250.73 U t i l i t y E os em en NBT/i 8 /� ep \ ti ,�k5�4 5`, 01 13 i VG: Sk9� 1 L 1 c. SiG9 , 43' GIP h°:63--:-.4. 61-v.$ s rV N� to 0Q N '1g 14 ti a 4 . ,. �O �3it s JR.4 `s a ry 4- - S89'32'091_19 71. 92 _,1,1 Uld r - 58978T9 E 203075 -I ��16q'I I, 5�9 1h' i 1- I - �8918'49E___WJ 210.00 _1 2 I8 Ala r Rural Cooperative Power Association Easement ? - 135.00 Per Doc. No. 320796. 989°35'30"E And L Drainage and Utility Easement - - - -- Soo One NW1 /4 -NW1 /4 Sec.9 -T31N -1222W L_ S8978.49 - -21-0.60 - - - -21 I� -5 1 Rural Cooperative 210 00 N89'4925W - 119.Jb_J i ly ym X436- 1 �• Y;y .p D0 o 1 n N89°49'25 "W �2 1 .� �� I R 2poo o¢1 o ~ � 18 �� 00 I I o 17 ,` L J 4r1 J 60 L 115.11 N89 °35'30 "W 7, 6 e 0y,6 . h6 __ . . 20 _ , 751"6 X3 l 3 / 9 / / o I i- //// 0'500; I I -,747. _ f a- 1 � r �o ,, 10 11 I OI I 01 5i_ // "I I Power Association Eosemen Per Doc. No 320796. - -`\`\ And 2 I( Drainage and Utility Easement 18330 _ 167.98 110.4 \ 876.95 12 2 r 13 L - _ 0 0 S89 °35'30 "E Land Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. 102.80 South Line NE1 /4 -NWI /4 SEo.2- E,,L -R22W - 1/11 n FILE IIOPY -- - - -- i(ES JAN 1 C 200 SHEET SH 2 SHEETS • AGENDA ITEM 7.B. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson MEETING DATE: February 14, 2007 TOPIC: Variance Arterial Road Setback To allow a Garage Addition BACKGROUND Jeff Zeske and Susan Goepfert have requested approval of a Variance from the Arterial Road Setback (40 feet) to allow a garage addition that would be 30 feet from Apollo Drive. The proposed accessory building (garage) addition would meet the setback requirements from Terra Court and the rear lot line, but would encroach ten feet into the Apollo Drive setback. The Apollo Meadows subdivision is located on the south side of Apollo Drive just east of Sunset Road. At the time of construction the same setbacks were in place as they are today, yet the two homes on either side of the subject site received permits from the city and were constructed with 30 foot setbacks (one additional home in the subdivision that is adjacent to Apollo Drive was built with a 35 foot setback). lit ALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 North Apollo Drive N/A N/A South Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 East Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 West Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 Streets: Apollo Drive is a County State Aid Highway developed within a 100 foot right of way. The Zoning Ordinance therefore classifies it as a major arterial roadway. Terra Court is an existing road developed within a 60 foot right of way. As it serves only the ten existing homes, it is considered a local street by the Zoning Ordinance. Setbacks: The lot is zoned R -1 (Single Family Residential) and is required to adhere to the following setbacks established in the Zoning Ordinance: From Streets: Local Street Collector or Arterial Street ide Yard: Principal Building Accessory Building Thirty (30) Feet Forty (40) Feet Ten (10) Feet Five (5) Feet Rear Yard: Principal Building Accessory Building Thirty (30) Feet Five (5) Feet Findings: State law requires the following finings to be made in order to grant the approval of a variance. Staff has completed the findings in regards to the upland lot area reduction based on the revised submittal: FINDINGS • In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property is currently developed with a single family home that can easily be put to a reasonable use without the addition of a third garage stall. b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. While the property is a corner lot and is therefore subject to increased setback standards, there is no physical circumstance unique to this property that was not created by the placement of the structure at time of construction. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. The request made by the property owner has nothing to do with economic considerations; the placement of the home on the lot when it was constructed simply prohibits the addition of a third garage stall under the strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Considering that three of the seven single family homes that abut Apollo Drive were approved by the city and constructed at reduced setbacks, granting this variance will not confer on the applicant any special privilege. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of the setbacks required by the ordinance is to allow separation between roadways and homes and to increase visibility at intersections. Allowing this home to continue the trend of reduced setbacks along Apollo Drive would not be in keeping with that spirit and intent. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending denial of the request for a variance based on the finding of fact included in the body of the staff report. If approved the following conditions should be included: 1. All materials and construction methods shall match that of the existing dwelling. This review is based on the following plans and information: Goepfert/Zeske submittal packet received January 16, 2007 • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SWENSON LAND SURVEYING 827 Norwood Street RONALD J. SWENSON Anoka, Minnesota 55303 TELEPHONE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR SURVEY FOR: 6EMLER HOMES -(C 906' z *.90G1 $ 0 30 90-14- A PO LLO DRNE A./37° '47' /62.00 9oLa _E' x 908- 3o.p kr.I 0 30.0 0 190 (.Q 44.0 0 0 0 0 • 6`9 2o.'33■9 � 1 c-sj 21.7 2-1.(.1 0 • od co 11-011 N� N. 22.33 • 9011 0 01 44.o u; O 9o7z x 907 N87°4.8'47'2. /62.00 PROPOSED. GRADES TOP OF FOUNDATION = 908.8 GARAGE FLOOR = 908.5 LOWEST FLOOR = 905.6 (612) 427 -1020 • Denotes Iron Monuments Found O Denotes Iron Monuments Set Scale 1 Inch equals 4o feet Book 12-0 Page \a Invoice No. \834 690 9— OX 907` FILE COPY RECEIVED JAN 1 6 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION x900.0 DENOTES PROPOSED GRADES {900.0} DENOTES SURFACE DRAINAGE > I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lot 3S, Block 1, APOLLO MEADOWS, Anoka County, Minnesota. It does purport to show improvements or encroachments, if any. As surveyed by me this 20th day of May. 1993. Ronald J. Swenson, Registered Land Surveyor, MN. License No. 13297 Background In May of 1993, we contracted with Semler Homes to build a house at 7300 Terra Court in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. This was the first house to be constructed on this particular cul -de- sac. The original house plan presented to us included a 3 -car garage (see Fig 1.) Fig. 1 Original architect drawing showing proposed home with 3 -car garage Due to financial limitations at the time of construction, several cuts were made to keep the building project in line with our budget. These cuts included, but were not limited to, not installing central air conditioning at the time of construction, eliminating the box window in the living room, eliminating the decorative brick on the exterior of the building, and constructing only a 2 car garage rather than a 3 stall garage (see Fig. 2) • • FILE COPY RECEIVED JAN 1 6 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Fig. 2 Architect drawing showing proposed home (home that was eventually built) with 2 -car garage. During construction, we understood that while we could not afford any of the above mention options, we would have the opportunity to add them in the future when money was available. • • • • While conducting research for this project and completing this variance request, the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance 08 -03 was reviewed, specifically Section 6, Subdivision 1, Section B, Item 4a, describing setbacks. Item 4a provides setbacks from local streets are a minimum of 30 feet and collector or arterial streets is 40 feet. According to the survey on file for our property, the minimum setbacks were met. However after reviewing a recent aerial photo of our property and the surveys on file for the properties to the immediate east and west of the our property, it is obvious that the minimum setbacks were not enforced for these parcels (see Fig. 4 - red line shows minimum set back required by City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance 08- 03). It is reasonable to believe that if the subject property were constructed as originally proposed with the 3 -stall garage, the minimum setback from the collector or arterial street would have been breached. We are asking at this time that we be allowed the same rights enjoyed by our neighbors. Fig. 4. Aerial photo of subject property and surrounding properties showing minimum setbacks. FILE COPY RECEIVED JAN 1 6 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Proposal We are requesting a variance to add a 3rd stall garage onto our existing dwelling. In order to preserve windows presently located on the north side of the dwelling, the roof line and gable must be constructed differently than the original design. The new design will allow for a deeper garage and additional storage space (see Fig 3. and Fig 4. with proposed 3rd stall addition). Fig. 3 Architect drawing showing proposed 3`d stall addition. LEFT (NORTH) ELEVATION Fig. 4 Architect drawing showing proposed 3rd stall addition. • • FILE COPY RECEIVED JAN 1 6 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES In order to proceed with the construction, we are requesting a variance that will allow us to build 10 feet into the northern or collector /arterial street setback. The construction of the garage will not affect the setback on the city street. • EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING HOUSE FLOOR PLAN SCALE = V8" FILE COPY RECEIVED JAN 1 6 2007 CITY OF LW O LAKES NORTH Narrative Information: describing the unique hardship associated with the property, which warrant the consideration of the variance. All variances are evaluated against the following criteria: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use under the conditions allowed by official controls. • We planned to construct a 3rd stall garage onto the north side of our house and property. We subsequently learned that, based on the minimum setback requirements as set forth in the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance No. 08 -03, the property in question cannot be put to any use as the house on the property is constructed at the minimum setback requirements for both the city street and the arterial street. If the ordinance is enforced, we will be prevented from constructing the third garage stall. 2. That the plight of the landowner is due to physical circumstances unique to the property, not created by the landowner. • It is reasonable to believe that if the current house was constructed as originally proposed with the 3 -stall garage, the minimum setback from the collector or arterial street would have been violated. Our house would have been placed on the property in a similar manner to the houses to the immediate east and west of our property, thus exceeding the 40 foot setback as required by City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance. We are asking that we be allowed the same opportunity currently enjoyed by our neighbors, and which we would have enjoyed had we built the garage at the time of construction. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic consideration alone, if a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. • Construction of a garage on the northern side of the existing dwelling is a reasonable use for this part of the property. The construction of an additional single story garage will not create a visual barrier or present a safety hazard for the city or arterial street. • Dwellings located to the immediate east and west of our property were clearly constructed outside of the minimum setback requirements for an arterial street. • Construction of an additional single story garage would not exceed in any way, the setback requirements for the city street. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. • Many of the homes on the street and in the surrounding neighborhood were originally constructed with 3 -car garages. We request the opportunity to enjoy the same privileges shared by our neighbors. Additionally, granting a variance and allowing construction into the minimum setback limits to the north by 10 feet will bring our dwelling in -line with the dwellings located immediately to the east and west of our property. RECEIVED . JAN 1 6 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES FILE COPY • • An alternate location for a free standing garage does exist on our property to the west of the existing dwelling. However, considerable excavation and tree removal would be required to make this part of the property usable. In addition, the existing driveway would need to be routed around the exterior of the dwelling and through a fence line to access the area. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. • The ordinance is not intended to prevent the construction of homes with three car garages and in fact, a majority of the homes near us on lots of a similar size have three car garages. Additionally, the ordinance is not intended to prevent homeowners from making upgrades or additions to their homes. • Construction of a 3rd stall garage will not cause us to encroach on the arterial road any more than the properties to the east and west of our property. It will also not render any changes to the minimum setback requirements for the city street. Keeping in spirit with the ordinance, a variance will allow us all to enjoy the same privileges and opportunities as our neighbors to the east and west. RECEIVED JAN 1 6 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES • FILE COPY • AGENDA ITEM VII. C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: February 14, 2007 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING: Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PUD Development Plan Comforts of Home, CORE Development BACKGROUND CORE Development proposes a planned unit development (PUD) that includes commercial uses and several types of senior residential development. The site is located on the west side of Hodgson Road, approximately 300 feet north of the Co. Rd. J intersection. The property consists of 17 acres with about 1000' of frontage on Hodgson Road. The senior residential would be on two lots on the northern part of the site and commercial development would include three lots on the southern part. The proposal does not include the existing liquor store, insurance office, or closed bar /restaurant. It only includes the largely vacant parcel to the north of them Because the proposal includes a mix of residential and commercial uses, a rezoning PUD is needed rather than a conditional use permit PUD. The PUD requirements do not fully address a mixed use project such as this, so there are some challenges in applying the letter of the ordinance to a proposal with both commercial and residential elements. The City has been preparing a Master Plan for development in the area on both sides of Hodgson Road. The purpose of the Master Plan is to create a framework to guide development in the study area. Development should be compared to the Master Plan framework as well as other aspects of the City's Comprehensive Plan and ordinances. ANALYSIS The following summarizes the project proposal: Gross Site Area 17.2 acres Upland Area 16.7 acres Residential Area 7.3 acres Commercial Area 8.2 acres dedicated right of way 1.3 acres Condominiums 48 Senior Apartments 41 Assisted Living Units 42 Commercial 77,450 sf Comforts of Home page 2 Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Zoning Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use (Comp. Plan) Zoning Site rural home, vacant Mixed Use GB General Business North rural residential Low Density, Unsewered Resid. Rural South commercial Mixed Use GB General Business East commercial Commercial GB General Business West residential Low Dens. Sewered Resid. R -1X, Single Family Executive Comprehensive Plan: The site is within a Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area and is within the existing Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The Comprehensive Plan guides the project site for Mixed Use development. The comprehensive plan creates seven planning districts across the city that include recommendations for the specified areas. The project site is within planning district four, which includes the following relevant recommendations: 4. Unsewered residential neighborhoods shall be maintained as long term and uses. Extension of sanitary sewer into unsewered subdivisions will occur only at the request of the private property owners. 7. When considering new development, the ability of the street system to accommodate additional traffic will be evaluated. 10. The commercial land uses within District 4 are located near major street intersections. The commercial locations are oriented to serving the nearby neighborhoods. In this respect, the City will regulate future commercial development to control land use intensity and establish both site and building designs that will be compatible with the surrounding residential uses. Attention will be given to site design, building architecture, green space, setbacks, access, signage and lighting to create attractive commercial locations. 12. The City will work to establish a hierarchy of streets to improve traffic circulation throughout District 4. Street planning efforts will include: b. Maintain Hodgson Road and County Road J as "A" minor arterial streets. With this functional classification, the right -of -way width and roadway design should promote traffic movement and limit direct site access. 13. Implement the City Park Plan to locate and develop a comprehensive park and trail system within District 4. • • • • • Comforts of Home page 3 The Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2002 and included the Mixed Use land use category. However, there was no descriptive text to explain the purpose of this category. In 2006, the City Council amended the Comprehensive Plan to include, for the first time, a description of the intent of the Mixed Use designation: The Mixed Use designation is intended to accommodate development that includes a variety of land uses. This could be a development that integrates uses in the same building, such as residential units above commercial space. It also might include different uses in separate locations as elements of a larger development, as part of a master plan. The 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendment also included some performance standards: Development in areas guided Mixed Use must comply with the following performance standards: 1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding and uses in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition, landscaping, and site access. 2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and convenient traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access management design elements for access to arterial and collector roadways. 3. Municipal water and sanitary sewer service must be available. 4. All development shall address environmental concerns with regard to site planning, landscaping, impervious surfacing, open space, and storm water management. Stormwater management must incorporate methods to protect and improve water quality such as infiltration, buffering of water bodies, and other natural methods whenever feasible. 5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility, connections to residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of interaction among local businesses and between businesses and residents. 6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically pleasing, high quality buildings and streetscapes. With both residential and commercial uses, the proposal follows with the intent of the Mixed Use land use category. The proposal also should be compared to these performance standards. Comforts of Home page 4 Hodgson Road /Co. Rd. J Master Plan: The City has been preparing a study of the land and infrastructure around the intersection of Hodgson Road (CSAH 49) and County Road J (Ash Street). The goal is a planning document that will be adopted by the City Council as the guide for development of the area by incorporating it into the City's Comprehensive Plan. This action is on the February 12 City Council agenda. The Master Plan establishes a framework for the area and includes a number of planning objectives to guide development. The objectives address infrastructure and design elements for the area. The location of accesses on Hodgson and Co. Rd. J is one of the most important pieces of the framework. The objectives describe specific locations for access points as well as circulation needs and some specific elements of the framework, which are illustrated on the Master Plan graphic. Individual aspects of the proposed project are compared to the Master Plan under the respective headings below. Growth Management: The Growth Management Policy (Ordinance No. 24 -04) limits the number of dwelling units that can be approved for platting annually. There are 66 units committed for 2007 already, leaving 81 for this year. The policy does not distinguish between types of dwelling units. A question arises about whether or not all the units in the proposed project are to be counted the same way that single family homes and townhomes are counted under the growth policy. If so, the proposal includes a total of 131 dwelling units, and a phasing plan is needed with a target maximum of 50 for each phase. Therefore the policy would allow one of the unit types to be constructed each year for three years (48 condos in the four buildings, the 41 senior apartments in their building, or the 42 assisted living units in their building). An alternative is to consider the assisted living units building as an institutional facility rather than a dwelling unit building. This would remove the 42 assisted living "units" from the growth management policy restrictions, leaving 89 condo and apartment units that are subject to the growth policy. A two -phase plan would be needed under this scenario. However the project is broken down, the subdivision ordinance requires that all preliminary plats include a phasing plan. Density: It is difficult to calculate residential density on this project for several reasons. There are three very different types of dwelling units on two separate lots. The 48 condominium units, labeled "townhomes" on the plan, are on Lot 2, which has about 3.4 acres of upland. This calculates out to about 14 units per acre for that lot. The 41 senior apartments and the 42 assisted living units both sit on Lot 1, which comprises about four acres. This calculates to about 20 units per acre if all the units are counted as dwelling units the same way. • • • • • Comforts of Home page 5 The density for all dwelling units on both residential lots is 131 units on 7.4 acres is approximately 17 u/a. The PUD standards require that the maximum allowable density within an urban residential PUD shall be consistent with the density directives of the Comprehensive Plan. That is, whatever the density is for that land use category. The Mixed Use category does not specify a density range for residential development. In order to provide some frame of reference it may be useful to recall the ranges for the categories of Medium Density Residential (3 -6 u/a), High Density Residential (6 -12 u/a) and the Town Center (10 -24 u/a). Zoning: The site is in a General Business zoning district, but the proposal is to rezone it to Planned Unit Development (PUD). Many of the development requirements in a PUD are created with the project, and the Zoning Ordinance establishes some PUD specifics as well. For comparison purposes, it may be useful to compare the proposal with the R -3, R -4, and GB zoning district standards. Remember that this table is for comparison only. Community Survey: In the discussion of this proposed project, there has been some talk of the Quality of Life Survey conducted for the City in 2005. Three questions are particularly relevant. One question asked if the respondent would favor or oppose attracting neighborhood commercial centers, 16% strongly favored this, 44% favored it. Neighborhood commercial center was defined as a small outdoor mall usually containing a limited number of shops, professional offices, and /or service establishments. Another question asked if the City were to attract more development, what kind would you prefer it to be? Of the responses, 18% wanted retail and service establishments, 11% said restaurants, 2% said grocery store. R -3 R -4 GB Proposed building setbacks: resid. commerc. from street 40' 40' 40' 70' 40' rear lot line 30' 30' 30' 27' 60' side lot line parking setbacks: 10' 20' 10' 20' 20' from street no req. no req. 15' 70' 15' rear lot line 5' 5'. 10' 15' 15' side lot line commercial from resid. district 5' 5' 10' 35' 10' 10' - 60' Bldg. height 36' 45' 45' 36' not submitted Impervious max. 65% 65% 75% not submitted Community Survey: In the discussion of this proposed project, there has been some talk of the Quality of Life Survey conducted for the City in 2005. Three questions are particularly relevant. One question asked if the respondent would favor or oppose attracting neighborhood commercial centers, 16% strongly favored this, 44% favored it. Neighborhood commercial center was defined as a small outdoor mall usually containing a limited number of shops, professional offices, and /or service establishments. Another question asked if the City were to attract more development, what kind would you prefer it to be? Of the responses, 18% wanted retail and service establishments, 11% said restaurants, 2% said grocery store. Comforts of Home page 6 When asked about certain community characteristics, 45% said there is too little senior housing, 32% said about right, and 23% didn't know. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Development Stage Plan Site: The site currently consists of one parcel that includes approximately 17 acres. The property has a trapezoidal shape due to the Woodridge Estates neighborhood, which forms a diagonal western border to the site. The site does not include the liquor store, insurance office, or the boarded -up 49 Club. The site currently has extensive tree cover. A small wetland of less than 1/2 acre sits in the northwest corner of the site. Residential Buildings, Units: The proposal includes three types of dwelling units. On Lot 1 in the northeast part of the site, two large buildings would be built: one with senior apartments and one for assisted living units. Though they are connected by a commons building, they are very different types of dwelling units. Owner - occupied condominium units would be constructed on Lot 2 in the northwestern part of the site. (These are labeled "townhomes ", but townhomes typically are characterized as having individual entrances to the street and the units extend from foundation to roof. This report will refer to them as condominiums.) • Assisted Living: The 42 assisted living units are similar to hospital rooms in some ways. The have no kitchens, and the building has common dining areas. While all unit have toilet /wash rooms, two large bathing rooms on each floor provide for assisted bathing. This building would have a cultured stone base about three feet high around the entire building. A brick veneer would complete the first floor elevation. The second floor would have Hardipanel lap siding and vertical siding. Building heights are measured halfway up a gabled roof (the average height of the highest gable). The tallest gable on the assisted living building is 43' high with an average height of 33'. • Senior Apartments: This building includes apartments on the ground level and second floor, with underground parking. The 41 senior apartments include one - bedroom apartments and studio apartments. Both types have full baths and kitchens in each unit. The apartment building would have a cultured stone base around the entry areas but not around the entire building. Hardiplank vertical and horizontal siding would cover the majority of the walls. No brick veneer is included on the elevations. This building height is similar to the assisted living building: about 33' with a peak of about 43'. • Condominiums: There would be four condominium buildings with 12 owner- occupied units in each building for a total of 48 units. The ground floor would be resident indoor • • Comforts of Home page 7 • parking. Each of the second and third floors would have six condo units. Each unit • would have one bedroom as well as a den or similar room. The condominium buildings would have the same materials as the apartment buildings. Cultured stone base around the front and sides but the back would have only some stone base accent locations. Hardiplank vertical and horizontal siding would cover the majority of the walls. No brick veneer is included on the elevations. The highest gable on these buildings have an average height of about 36', with a peak of about 42'. The zoning ordinance includes requirements for multiple family buildings. A minimum of 33% of the combined area of exterior walls shall have brick, stucco, and /or natural or artificial stone (Sec. 3, Subd. 4.B.3.) The assisted living building meets this standard, but the other two buildings do not. Adding the brick veneer would solve this. We would need to ensure that mechanical equipment (air conditioning units) would be within the structures or, if outside, that they would be separated and screened from adjacent residential properties. The westernmost condo buildings are less than 30' from the property line shared with the Woodridge Estates lots. Even the R -4 High Density residential zone requires a minimum 30' rear setback. A PUD does allow flexibility, but the setback of a three -story structure from an existing neighborhood should be an important design consideration. Commercial Buildings: The proposal includes four commercial buildings: a supermarket of 55,130 sf; retail building of 12,320 sf; and two other buildings of 5,000 sf each. We have not received building elevations for any of the commercial lots. The City has approved a PUD in the Town Center without all building elevations, but the approval included extensive architectural design standards with which future building must comply. The Marketplace (Target & Kohl's) development also included design standards for all buildings in the development. We have not received any design architectural design guidelines for the commercial portion of the project. The Woodridge Estates neighborhood backs up to the site. This raises the issue of noise from trucks loading. The loading dock of the supermarket is about 150' from the nearest existing house on Woodridge Lane and about 60' from the backyard. For comparison, the Target loading dock is approximately 180' from the nearest home. There are fewer homes near the Target dock in comparison to the proposed supermarket. A large wall provides visual and noise screening. Such a wall could be constructed to shield the loading dock(s) on this site. In addition, the Marketplace approval ordinance includes restrictions on delivery hours. Motor Fuel Pumps: The proposal includes fuel pumps near the main access and along Hodgson Road. Motor fuel stations are a conditional use in the General and Limited Business zoning districts, as well as in both Light and General Industrial zones. The CUP requirements for motor fuel stations are identical in all zones that allow them. The Comforts of Home page 8 proposal if for the site to be rezoned to PUD, but the requirements for motor fuel stations should still apply. (If the application proceeds, a public hearing for the motor fuel station CUP can be held by the City Council.) • Architectural Standards and Canopy: The CUP requirements include architectural information to ensure compliance with specific standards listed in the ordinance. The principal building must comply with the City's architectural requirements for commercial buildings, and the canopy over the gas pumps must be complementary and compatible with the principal building. The project submittal lacks any elevations for the commercial buildings and pump canopy. Nor were any architectural guidelines or standards submitted for the project that would establish specific parameters. • Lighting: Lighting is an important element for canopies. The submittal lacks information on the canopy lighting and signage. • Landscaping: The CUP requirements also address landscaping. As noted below, the submitted landscaping plan shows the locations of general categories of plantings but does not provide detailed plant species for sizes. Thick screening is not required on the front of properties, and the gas pumps are surrounded by parking and drive lanes, so screening from residential land is not an issue for the gas pumps. Comparison to Hodgson /Co Rd J Master Plan: The Master Plan includes site design objectives to create an urban form for the area. Building are to be at intersection corners to establish the "cornerstones" of the urban form. Development should avoid lining Hodgson with large parking lots, and any parking lots should have extensive landscaping and screening. Parking lots should have internal landscaping and pedestrian walkways. Pedestrian circulation should be an important design factor. The proposal does not include buildings at intersection corners and pedestrian circulation is not a major factor of the site layout in the commercial area. Design guidelines are to be prepared for any new development. Buildings are to have four -sided architecture. We have no commercial building elevations or design guidelines. The Mixed Use performance standards in the Comprehensive Plan include some similar requirements: 1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding and uses in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition, landscaping, and site access. 5. Commercial site designs shall emphasize pedestrian accessibility, connections to residential neighborhoods, shared parking, and green space to create a customer friendly environment and promote a high level of interaction among local businesses and between businesses and residents. • Comforts of Home page 9 6. Architectural and site standards shall be applied to establish aesthetically pleasing, high quality buildings and streetscapes. The residential area of the proposal includes pedestrian accessibility and connections, and the buildings are aesthetically pleasing. (Adding brick would bring them into compliance with city standards.) However, the condominium buildings are setback less than 30' from existing residential properties. The commercial area of the proposal lacks pedestrian circulation elements and the landscaping is minimal. Elements of the Master Plan specific to traffic, access, circulation and right of way are discussed below. Landscaping, Tree Preservation, Screening: The screening of large commercial buildings definitely is an important factor for any development adjacent to an existing residential neighborhood. The submitted landscaping plan shows the locations of general categories of plantings: deciduous shade trees, ornamental trees, coniferous trees, and deciduous shrubs and perennials. The plan does not depict enough plantings to provide the screening along the west and north borders that are required by Sec. 3, Subd. 4.Q. of the zoning ordinance. Almost all trees on the site would be lost if the project is built. In an area designated for commercial and mixed use, this probably should be expected. The great majority of trees depicted as "saved" on the tree inventory are located in the area to be dedicated for right of way for Hodgson Road. All these would be removed with future road improvements, so they should not be considered as saved trees. Lighting: City requirements allow no more than 0.4 foot candles at the residential property line and no more than 1.0 at street right of way lines. All exterior fixtures must be 90 degree cutoff fixtures. We received a photometric plan with cut sheets for parking lot and drive area fixtures. There are two fixture types noted as "forward throw ". This would need to be changed to meet the 90 degree cutoff requirement. The plan does not show any area that exceeds the foot candle maximums. However, there is no information regarding lighting in the back of the supermarket building. This would need to be supplied as this area could have a great effect on the homes to the west. We typically require cut sheets of the wall fixtures and the photometric analysis must include these fixtures. Signage: Signage is governed by the City's sign ordinance and permits are required for all signs. We typically would want a signage plan for a PUD of this scale. Individual signs then would be compared to the approved signage plan upon submittal of sign permit applications. The locations of monument signs are shown on the plans, but we have no other information. A complete sign plan could be required as a condition of approval. Comforts of Home page 10 Utilities: As identified in the Hodgson/Co. Rd. J Master Plan, existing water and sanitary sewer infrastructure is insufficient in the area. The proposal does resolve these issues to a great degree. The design utilizes an existing public easement and the developer would purchase an additional easement from two adjacent properties in order to connect to existing water and sanitary sewer pipes in Woodridge Lane. The water would loop to the Raven's Hollow development north of the site. A lift station would be constructed for sanitary sewer on the site. The Rohavic Oaks neighborhood is guided to continue as an unsewered area. Bringing utilities through that area raises greater challenges as we have heard little interest from the residents in getting utility service. This connection to the existing Woodridge Lane water and sewer pipes would resolve some important utility challenges for the area. The City Engineer's review is attached. Wetlands and Stormwater Management: A small wetland of about '/z acre exists in the northwest part of the site. Our subdivision ordinance requires a drainage and utility easement that extends 10' beyond the delineated wetland edge to provide a buffer (Sec. 1007 -4, par. 9). The trail and other elements near the wetland do not allow for this easement. There are several issues regarding the design of the proposed stormwater facilities. One pond lies within the area to be dedicated for right of way for Hodgson Road. Another has a 100 -year high water elevation that would flood the loading dock area of the supermarket. The City requires low floor elevations of buildings to be at least two feet above high water elevations of ponds. Several ponds have high water elevations that would not meet this requirement relative to the existing homes to the west and north. A rain garden is designed directly above the proposed sanitary sewer lift station. This is not workable. The City Engineer's review is attached. Traffic, Access, Circulation, Right of Way: Access to the site is proposed at two locations. The main access driveway would be about 1170'± north of Co. Rd. J., or about 150'± south of the north edge of the property. A second driveway is proposed 550'± to the south. • Right Of Way: Additional right of way would be dedicated for Hodgson Road comprising approximately 1.3 acres. It appears that this would be sufficient for future roadway needs. This would need to be reviewed with Anoka County prior to final plat approval. • • Comforts of Home page 11 • Consistency With the Comprehensive Plan and Hodgson/Co Rd J Master Plan: As noted early in this report, the Mixed Use description in the Comprehensive Plan includes the performance standards. Several are relevant to transportation issues: 1. The land use and site design must be sensitive to the surrounding land uses in the area, including but not limited to building height, exterior composition, landscaping, and site access. 2. The road network within new development shall promote the safe and convenient traffic movement. The project design must incorporate access management design elements for access to arterial and collector roadways. The Comprehensive Plan also includes the recommendation for Planning District 4 that: 7. When considering new development, the ability of the street system to accommodate additional traffic will be evaluated. The Hodgson/Co Rd J Master Plan designates one full access to Hodgson Road 990± feet north of the Co. Rd. J intersection. No other new accesses are to be allowed, and existing driveways would be eliminated as property develops. The full access would lead to a route through the site, via easements, to a partial access onto Co. Rd. J. These access points and circulation routes are to create a circulation network serving all properties rather than individual driveways onto arterial roads that serve only individual properties. The Master Plan includes the objective that: development shall not create the need for a traffic signal at the new full access, and; one project should not be allowed to use up traffic capacity so that other sites could not develop without creating the need for a traffic signal. These objectives derive from a series of traffic analyses and examination of existing and future land use possibilities. Access management is an important consideration and guided the Hodgson/Co. Rd. J Master Plan transportation analyses. The access locations in the Master Plan took into account existing and future land uses and access needs for the entire study area. The proposal does include the additional right of way needed for Hodgson Road. However, the proposal in not consistent with the Master Plan on other points. The proposal includes no south access route to Co. Rd. J, and it includes a second driveway onto Hodgson that serves only the site. The location of the proposed main access is directly across from the existing garden center rather than in the 990' location. This proposal would not allow for a full intersection without relocating the garden center. Finally, a traffic study of the development application demonstrates roadway system breakdown at the study intersections if full development is realized. That analysis anticipates full development of the study area, including the Comforts of Home proposal. The high traffic generation of the proposal would "use up" traffic capacity of the anticipated roadway system, causing area development to exceed the system's capacity. Comforts of Home page 12 Parking: The plan includes more parking spaces than required. It is common practice in Lino Lakes to attempt to minimize the impervious surface. However, most of the "excess" parking is for visitors for the senior housing area, where most of the parking is within the lower levels of two buildings. The exterior parking in the residential area does not seem excessive. The parking for the commercial areas includes 25 spaces behind the retail shops that are adjacent to the supermarket. This is a very inconvenient location for customers, though these spaces could be for employees. (Issues of safety, lighting, etc. would have to be addressed.) It seems likely that trucks would continue through this area and come out around the south side of the building rather than turn around in the area designated for turning around. REZONING CRITERIA As required by the zoning ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. As described in the staff report, the project does not comply with a number of policies and provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The location of buildings, landscaping, traffic generation, and access locations are not compatible with present and future land uses in the area. • • 90% parking requirement spaces required spaces provided retail commercial 77,450 sf 69,705 sf 1 space per 200 sf 349 356 senior assisted living 1 space per 6 beds plus 1 space per 2 employees 7 3 24 senior apartments 1 space per unit 41 68 senior condominiums 1 space per unit 48 68 residential total 99 160 The parking for the commercial areas includes 25 spaces behind the retail shops that are adjacent to the supermarket. This is a very inconvenient location for customers, though these spaces could be for employees. (Issues of safety, lighting, etc. would have to be addressed.) It seems likely that trucks would continue through this area and come out around the south side of the building rather than turn around in the area designated for turning around. REZONING CRITERIA As required by the zoning ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. As described in the staff report, the project does not comply with a number of policies and provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The location of buildings, landscaping, traffic generation, and access locations are not compatible with present and future land uses in the area. • • • • • Comforts of Home page 13 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The application lacks sufficient information to determine if the project conforms to standards for motor fuel stations. Architectural information also is lacking, which is required for a planned unit development. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Sanitary sewer capacity exists to accommodate the project as proposed. Preliminary analysis does not determine that the project is infeasible, though additional information is necessary. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. A traffic study of the development application demonstrates roadway system breakdown at the study intersections if full development is realized. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION The Environmental Board reviewed the project on January 31, 2007. Their comments are attached . OPTIONS 1. Recommend approval of the project as proposed. 2. Recommend denial of the project based on the finding listed in this report. RECOMMENDATION Option 2 FINDINGS 1. The City of Lino Lakes has a Comprehensive Plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and other official controls to promote the public health, safety and welfare by guiding and regulating development in the city. Comforts of Home page 14 2. The City has prepared a Hodgson Road /Co. Rd. J Master Plan to promote the public health, safety and welfare by guiding and regulating development in the vicinity of the Hodgson Road/Co. Rd. J intersection. 3. Architectural plans including elevations and architectural guidelines for future development phases are required by Sec. 2, Subd. 10.F.8.e.4 of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) requirements. Design guidelines are also a planning objective of the Hodgson Road/County Road J Master Plan, which is to be incorporated in the Comprehensive Plan. The City has approved a PUD in the past without building elevations for all buildings, but extensive design standards were approved. The Comforts of Home application does not include elevations or design guidelines for the commercial portion of the development. 4. The submittal lacks sufficient information needed to determine compliance with requirements for motor fuel stations as listed in the zoning ordinance relevant to: architectural standards, fuel pump canopy, pump islands, dust control and drainage (oil /grit separator), canopy lighting, or public address system noise. 5. The zoning ordinance includes building material requirements for multiple family buildings. A minimum of 33% of the combined area of exterior walls shall have brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone (Sec. 3, Subd. 4.B.3.) The assisted living building meets this standard, but the condominium buildings and the senior apartment building do not. 6. The proposed project is inconsistent with performance standards in the Comprehensive Plan as the setback of the condominium buildings from the west property line is less than 30 feet, which is the setback required in the most intense residential zoning district. This does not reflect sensitivity to the surrounding, existing land uses, particularly given the height of the proposed buildings. 7. The proposed project is inconsistent with performance standards and recommendations in the Comprehensive Plan as well as several specific transportation objectives of the City's Hodgson Road/Co. Rd. J Master Plan. • The main access is at a location that is not conducive to development on the east side of Hodgson because a full intersection cannot be created without removing an existing business. This does not promote access management design for access onto arterial roads. • A traffic study of the development application demonstrates roadway system breakdown at the study intersections if full development is realized in the area. 8. The Mixed Use performance standards in the Comprehensive Plan and the Hodgson/Co. Rd. J Master Plan emphasize pedestrian circulation as important design elements. The commercial area of the proposed project does not include internal pedestrian elements. • • • Comforts of Home page 15 9. The Hodgson Road /Co. Rd. J Master Plan includes several objectives promoting the creation of an urban form . The proposal does not include buildings at intersection corners and pedestrian circulation is not a major factor of the site layout in the commercial area. 10. Ordinance 24 -04 establishes a growth management policy that includes growth goals and targets and requires phasing plans for all residential development greater than 50 lots /units. The phasing plan must establish a schedule for final platting a specified number of lots /units on an annual basis and specify the location and number of lots /units in each phase. The City has not received a phasing plan nor information that supports the creation of a phasing plan. 11. Stormwater Pond 1 is proposed within the area to be dedicated for right of way for Hodgson Road. Ponds are not allowed in road rights of way. 12. Pond 3 has a 100 -year high water elevation that would flood the loading dock area of the supermarket. 13. The City requires low floor elevations of buildings to be at least two feet above high water elevations of ponds. Ponds 2 and 3 have high water elevations that would not meet this requirement relative to the existing homes to the west and north. 14. A rain garden is proposed directly above the proposed sanitary sewer lift station. This is not workable. 15. The proposed project's utility design includes connections to existing water and sanitary sewer pipes in Woodridge Lane and a water loop up to the Ravens Hollow development. This would resolve some important issues for utility service to the project area. 16. The subdivision ordinance requires a drainage and utility easement that extends 10' beyond the delineated wetland edge (Sec. 1007 -4, par. 9). The proposed trail and other elements do not allow for this easement. 17. As required by the zoning ordinance, the City shall consider possible adverse effects of a proposed zoning amendment and its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. As described in the above findings and the staff report, the project does not comply with a number of policies and provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Comforts of Home page 16 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The location of buildings, landscaping, traffic generation, and access locations are not compatible with present and future land uses in the area. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The application lacks sufficient information to determine if the project conforms to standards for motor fuel stations. Architectural information also is lacking, which is required for a planned unit development. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Sanitary sewer capacity exists to accommodate the project as proposed. Preliminary analysis does not determine that the project is infeasible, though additional information is necessary. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. A traffic study of the development application demonstrates roadway system breakdown at the study intersections if full development is realized. This review is based on the following submittals, received December 13, 2006: 1. Preliminary Plat, 12/12/06 2. Future Construction of Hodgson Road plan, 12/12/06 3. Certificate of Survey, SRF 4. Preliminary Utility Plan, 12/12/06 5. Preliminary Grading Plan, 12/12/06 6. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, 12/12/06 7. Tree Inventory, 12/12/06 8. Landscape Concept Plan, 7/11/06 9. Site Plan, 10. Floor Plans and Elevations for Senior Living Apartments Building, Senior Assisted Living Building, Commons Building, and Senior Townhomes 11. Photometric Plan, 12/12/06 12. Narrative with miscellaneous attached documents 13. Geotechnical Report, Drainage Report/Maps, other engineering data • • • • • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0053 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Comforts of Home Copies To: Site Plan Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Proj. No.: 13604.012 From: Thomas D. Prew, P. E. ! , Routing: Date: January 8, 2007 / The following Site Review is based on these submittals: 1. Updated Preliminary Plan Set (El -E2, Pl -P2, Ul, G1 -G2, F1 -F2, T1) prepared by Passe Engineering, Inc., dated December 12, 2006. 2. Architectural Preliminary Plan Set prepared by Frisbie Architects, dated December 12, 2006. 3. RCWD Permit Application No. 06 -067 dated August 18, 2006. 4. Traffic Analysis Review, CSAH 49 /County Road J, prepared by Westwood, dated December 12, 2006. 5. Letter prepared by the Metropolitan Council, dated August 23, 2006. Plat Comments: 1. CSAH 49 future layout must conform to Anoka County Master Plan. Only one access will be allowed off CSAH 49. Construction limits and R/W must be verified and an approved Permit provided to the City. 2. Proper access shall be provided for lot to the south of property. 3. Alignment of the northern entrance off of CSAH 49 is not consistent with proposed Anoka County access. 4. Proposed street names must be shown. 5. All proposed easements and vacations must be acquired and documentation provided. 6. The St. Paul Water Utility Right of Way must be addressed. Confirm ownership will be transferred. Watermain Comments: 1. Profiles shall be provided. 2. Minimum of 8' cover over watermain must be noted on utility plan. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Comforts of Home Site Review January 8, 2007 Page 2 3. Minimum of 18" separation and adequate insulation must be maintained for all sewer crossings. 4. Services must be shown. 5. Submit water test data for City review along with water pressure modeling for the proposed looping. 6. Hydrants and gate valves must be shown on plans. 7. Standard city details must be included in plan set. 8. Easement must be provided for a minimum of 10' on either side of watermain. 9. Maintenance Agreements must be established with all utilities. 10. Trees may not be planted within utility easements. 11. Detail of the Water Fountain must be provided for review (separate meter to be provided). 12. Water Trunkmain extension to be in accordance with Lino Lakes Water Comprehensive Plan. Sanitary Sewer Comments: 1. Profiles shall be provided. 2. Rim and invert shall be provided for all structures. 3. Services must be shown. 4. Standard City details must be included in plan set. 5. Easement must be provided for a minimum of 10' on either side of utility. 6. Maintenance Agreements must be established with all utilities. 7. Minimum depth for sanitary sewer of 8' must be maintained. 8. Trees may not be planted within utility easements. 9. Final SAC determination shall be performed by the MCES for their review prior to issuance of building permit. Street Comments: 1. Typical street section must be provided to include width and slope dimensions. 2. Trail detail must be shown on plans 3. Proposed street width is less than City standard 32' (back of curb to back of curb). Comforts of Home Site Review • January 8, 2007 • • Page 3 4. Proposed curb and gutter shall be City standard D412, with B618 around radii and catch basins. 5. Geotechnical Report must provide support for proposed street section (City standard bituminous mix must be corrected on plans). Grading Plan Comments: 1. Retaining wall elevations must be shown. Proposed wall must be engineered (support calculations and details provided) if over 4' high. Fence and guard rail must be provided per MNDOT Standard design. 2 Detail of Trench Drain must be provided for review. 3. A wetland buffer of 16.5' is recommended, 10' is required minimum. 4. Detail of roof drains must be provided. This shall include invert elevations, slopes, and outlet elevations to rain gardens. 5. Parking islands to be defined with curb and gutter. Proposed landscaping of parking islands must be noted. Drainage and Storm Sewer Comments: 1. Refer to the attached Drainage Review dated January 8, 2007. Miscellaneous Comments: 1. All necessary permits must be provided to the City for verification. 2. City Forester must approve Tree Preservation. 3. Screening must be provided to the North and West of the site. 4. Existing well and septic systems to be abandoned per state requirements and a well sealing record shall be provided to the City. TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0063 fax www.tkda.com To: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Reference: Comforts of Home Development Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. C.'1 Proj. No.: 13604.012 Date: January 8, 2007 Routing: • The following drainage review is based on these submittals: 1. Preliminary Grading Plan, Utility Plan, and SWPPP submitted by Passe Engineering, Inc. dated June 12, 2006 and revised December 12, 2006. 2. Drainage Report submitted by Passe Engineering, Inc. dated December 12, 2006 Drainage Review Comments: Significant Drainage Issues: 1. The City recognizes that existing houses adjacent to the wetland may not meet current low floor and low opening requirements; therefore, the proposed pond and wetland shall not exceed the existing normal water elevation, flood elevation, and overflow elevation of the existing wetland. The wetland overflow elevation appears to be located northwest of the wetland, not south of the wetland as indicated on the existing conditions watershed map. 2. Pond 3 shall meet current low floor and low opening requirements for existing adjacent houses located west of the site. The pond must be designed to maintain the 100 -year elevation at 2 feet below the low floor elevation of the existing houses, and the emergency overflow is required to be 1 foot below the low openings of the existing houses. As well, the 100 -year elevation of Pond 3, as currently designed, will flood the loading dock of the proposed retail building. 3. The Pond 1 100 -year elevation is within the future CSAH 49 right -of -way. Ponding of water in the public right -of -way is not allowed. 4. Label all low floor elevations of the proposed buildings on the Grading Plan. Low floors are required to be 2 feet above the 100 -year elevation of adjacent water bodies, and 4 feet above seasonally high groundwater elevations. Submit anticipated high ground water elevation information for the site. 5. It appears that a catch basin will replace the upstream flared end section of the existing 24" culvert. Provide calculations showing that the proposed inlet has adequate capacity to convey flow from the existing ditch. In addition, provide flood elevations at the inlet of the culvert under existing and proposed conditions. 6. A 10 foot wide buffer of native vegetation is required from the delineated edge of the existing • wetland. If grading occurs in the buffer, the area shall be restored with native vegetation. The proposed trail is not allowed in the buffer zone of the wetland. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Comforts of Home Development Page 2 January 8, 2007 Drainage Review • City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 7. The proposed trail must be located beyond the 100 -year flood elevation of the proposed ponds and existing wetland. 8. The rain garden and lift station should not be in the same location, as currently shown on the Utility Plan. 9. Include depression storage located in EX -C in the existing conditions model and route EX -C and EX -E through the existing 24" culvert located west of the site. The proposed discharge rates for the 2 -, 10 -, and 100- year rates shall not exceed the existing 2 -, 10 -, and 100- year rates for the site. 10. The soil boring information on the SWPPP Plan indicates that the predominant soils on the site are Type A soils. Please clarify the curve numbers based on Type B soils used in the existing conditions model. Disturbed areas under proposed conditions are required to be Type B soils. 11. The lag/CN method is used to determine the time of concentration based on the hydraulic length and average land slope over the entire watershed. Therefore, the lag/CN method should not be used in combination with the TR -55 method for the determination of subcatchment curve numbers. 12. The emergency overflow for Pond 1 discharges to the CSAH 49 ditch; therefore, permit approval from the County may be required. 13. Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District is required. Minor Plan and Drainage Calculation Issues: 1. Show and label contours for all rain gardens and ponds on the Grading Plan and ensure that the contours on the Grading Plan are consistent with stage- storage values in the model. 2. Indicate the overflow elevation and location of the existing wetland, stormwater ponds, rain gardens, and road /parking lot low points on the Grading Plan. 3. Update the elevation of the 10:1 bench on the Grading Plan to correspond to the revised normal water level. 4. A pre - treatment device, such as a sedimentation forebay or vegetated filter strip, is required upstream of the infiltration areas to prevent accelerated decay of the infiltration capacity due to clogging. 5. The typical pond skimmer detail located on Sheet G1 does not illustrate the pond outlet devices as modeled. Update the pond skimmer detail to include details, such as orifice and pipe configurations, consistent with the outlet devices defined in the model. 6. Include catchbasin and culvert inlet protection details on the plan. 7. Include notes on the Grading Plan incorporating the following: 1) the infiltration areas are not to be excavated to final grade until the contributing drainage areas have been constructed and fully stabilized, and 2) final excavation of the infiltration areas should be completed using light tracked equipment to avoid compacting the basin floor. Comforts of Home Development Page 3 January 8, 2007 Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 8. To provide a well aerated, highly porous surface, it is recommended that the soils of the infiltration basin floor be loosened to a depth of at least 24 inches, and the upper 10 inches of soil be tilled prior to planting. 9. As of HydroCAD 7.0, the peak elevation must not exceed the defined storage of the pond. Update Pond INF -1 to ensure that the peak elevation is below the defined storage. 10. The Grading Plan indicates that the water elevation of the existing wetland was at an elevation of 899.1 on May 3, 2006; however, the normal water level of the wetland was modeled at an elevation of 898 under existing conditions. Please clarify why the normal water level elevation in the model was not set at the observed water elevation. 11. The curve number for the off -site area to the north is inconsistent between the existing and proposed conditions model. Update the model for consistency. 12. The existing curve number for subcatchment EX -B is 67, brush in poor condition. Aerial photographs suggest that the site is a combination of woodland and open pasture area. Please clarify the curve number used in the model for existing subcatchment EX -B. 13. The curve number and total area for subcatchment PR -4 and the off -site area in subcatchment EX -A is inconsistent. Update the model for consistency. 14. Provide calculations demonstrating that PR -1 and PR -2 is only 65% and 75% impervious, respectively. • 15. A curve number of 100 should be used in the existing and proposed models to represent open water conditions. 16. Ensure that all pond outlet structure inverts as modeled are consistent with the pond outlet structure inverts labeled on the Utility Plan. 17. Submit storm sewer design calculations for review when completed. All storm sewers, including pond outlets, are required to be a minimum of 15" diameter pipes. • • • Environmental Board Recommendations January 31, 2007 The following Recommendations were made at the January 31, 2007 Environmental Board meeting concerning: Comforts of Home /CORE Development 1. Invasive species within the existing wetland should be eradicated as part of the site development and establish a healthy wetland for filtration and natural visual design. 2. The site should be modified to incorporate the required 10 foot buffer around the wetland and enhance greenway design. 3. A fueling site spill containment area should be designed into the plan. 4. Importing of soil shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. Pond designs should incorporate the use of for -bays for pretreatment and ease of maintenance. 6. Evaluate use of infiltration bmp's to treat parking lot runoff. 7. Provide adequate vehicle access to pond and infiltration areas. 8. A storm water maintenance agreement be executed between the City and Developer which includes a maintenance schedule for native planting and rain garden areas 9. The SWPPP be modified to incorporate the comments included in the SWPPP memo - attached. 10. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted. 11. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted in conformance with City requirements including screening plan for the west side of the property, rain garden planting schedules and irrigation. 12. The area of parking lot islands should be increased or combined to improve planting conditions. 13. The City Native Seed mix shall be used in all surface water management and buffer areas that are not formally planted 14. Roadway areas should be kept to a minimum. Motion to forward recommendations with attached SWPPP changes by Bor, second by Brouillet to approve, all were in favor. Holiday Stationstore 1. Recommend engineering look at an alternative to the pipe conveying storm water to the south of the proposed infiltration area. Alternatives desired from adding to a more comprehensive treatment train would include grassy swale, built with a system of check dams, and planted with deep rooting low- profile native plants. FEB -7 -2007 14:41 FROM: CITY OF SHOREUIEW 6514904696 '1111 d, x4444 aiary 7, 2007 CITY OF SHOREYIEW 4600 Victoria Street North, Shoreview, MN 55126 (651)490 -4600 Fax (651) 490 -4699 (651) 4904750 Voicerl'TY ww Cyfibotey_ew�nn us Mr. Jeff Smyser Community Development Department City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino i_;tkes, MN 55014 TO:99822499 P:2 /z Re: Core Development/Comforts of Home Proposed Development, Highway 49 Dear Mr. Smyser: CITY COUNCIL Sandy Martin, Mayor Blake Huffman Larry Morrisctte Terry Quigley Ady Wickstrom The City has reviewed the submitted development plans for the proposed Core Development/Comforts of Home development project located on Highway 49, north of County Road .1. Shoreview recently provided comments to you regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the County Road J/Ilighway 49 area in Lino Lakes. As indicated previously, Shoreview does have concerns regarding the impact "big box" retail may have on the transportation network. These same concerns are present with the proposed retail component of thc development plan. It appears that the retail area is designed with approximately 77,500 square feet of space and includes a grocery store. It is our understanding that any redevelopment of this area would instigate roadway improvements on Highway 49 north of County Road J. The intersection as it stands today would require significant geometric improvements and /or signalization to accommodate the growth, traffic volumes and patterns from such a development. Furthermore, Shoreview is concerned about thc potential downstream impacts on Highway 49 since the road south of County Road 1 is currently constructed as a two -lane roadway. This road is under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County and Ramsey County is beginning a formal multi -city visioning process to look at potential roadway improvements for the Highway 49 Corridor from Highway 36 to County Road J. The City does not expect the segment of Highway 49 south of County Road J to be prioritized for improvements; nor is funding currently available to improve this roadway segment. The City does have significant concerns regarding thc potential traffic impacts the retail development, specifically the grocery store, will have on the capacity of Highway 49 south of the redevelopment area. The City prefers redevelopment be limited to housing and smaller scale retail uses that serve the nearby neighborhoods so as not to negatively impact the function of Highway 49 or the surrounding neighborhoods. • Please pass these comments along to your Planning Commission and City Council members. You may contact me at 651- 490 -4642 or via e-mail at knoydinc@ci.shoreview.mnus if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathleen Nordine City Planner c. Mark Maloney. Public Works Director Tom Simonson, Community Development Director Dan Soler, Ramsey County • • Larkin IHoATTORNlYS na.n December 13, 2006 Mr. Jeff Smyser City Planner Lino Lakes City Hall 600 Town Center Pkwy Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 -1194 s EHERAL: 952- 835 -3800 FAX: 952 -896 -3333 VwE3: www.larkinhoffman.com Re: Comforts of Home / Jensen Farm Property CORE Development Planned Unit Development / Development Stage Plan Dear Mr. Smyser: CORE Development Services ( "CORE ") is pleased to submit to the City of Lino Lakes ( "City ") its plans and specifications for the proposed Comforts of Home development. Comforts of Home is proposed for the Jenson Farm property (`Site "), a 17 -acre parcel located near the intersection of Hodgson Road and County Road J in south central Lino Lakes, Minnesota. The Comforts of Home / CORE development will blend together medium density housing and commercial uses to provide the community with senior living, assisted living facilities, and neighborhood scale commercial uses, including grocery, while bringing in the infrastructure necessary to advance the redevelopment and development needs of the Site and properties to the south and east. Comforts of Home will be a new development to the community, but its vision and future will remain in the hands of long -time Lino Lakes' residents. This submittal includes a fully executed application for Planned Unit Development — Development Stage Plan. The submitted documents include the legal description of the Site. The required fees have been submitted with CORE's June 9, 2006 application, which have not been released by the City. A change in ownership of the Site causes CORE to amend its previous application with the attached corrected application. CORE requests the escrowed fees from the former application be earmarked for this amended application. Below is a list of documents contained in CORE's submittal that satisfies the City's requirements for review. This submission includes: 1. Site Plans, including a. Certificate of Survey b. Resource inventory c. Preliminary Plat Mr. Jeff Smyser December 13, 2006 Page 2 d. Preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan e. Preliminary utility plan 2. Soil boring report 3. Drainage report & drainage map 4. Wetland delineation report 5. EAW determination 6. Sanitary sewer flow calculations 7. Tree preservation plan & significant tree count 8. Landscaping plan 9. Gross and buildable acreage of all lots 10. Floor plans and elevations for the housing product 11. Lighting plan 12. Rice Creek Watershed District comment letter 13. Parking requirement count / peak parking demand analysis 14. Traffic analysis review prepared by Westwood Professional Services of the October 23, 2006 and January 11, 2006 traffic studies Three items are not required and therefore not part of this submittal. According to Lino Lakes' Subdivision Ordinance, Preliminary Plat § 1104 -1, it must be determined whether a wetland mitigation, a yield plan and an environmental evaluation are necessary. It has been determined by Passe Engineering that a wetlands mitigation plan, a yield plan and an environmental assessment worksheet are not needed. Applicant Information CORE Development Services CORE Development Services is more than just a development company. CORE is a team of professionals dedicated to meeting all of their clients needs, from concept to completion. Development team members are experts in every stage of the project development process, handling each step with care and excellence. What sets CORE apart, is their willingness and desire to partner with clients and working professionals. • • • • Mr. Jeff Smyser December 13, 2006 Page 3 • CORE Development Services is a diversified and experienced team of real estate development professionals who provide a complete range of site acquisition. design management, government approval processes, site construction coordination, and owners and lender representation services. The CORE Team is committed to projects from concept to completion. Ownership The Site is owned by CORE. CORE is working with the property owners south of the Site in order to coordinated development and redevelopment of the westerly side of the County Road J / Hodgson Road development area. Development Team The Development Team is comprised of the following: Mark Bigelbach, CORE Development Services John Haydon, CORE Development Services Joe Buche, CORE Development Services Wendy Jenson Fritz, Comforts of Home Allan Klugman, Westwood Professional Services Mark Kretschmer, Passe Engineering, Inc. Peter Coyle, Larkin Hoffman Attorneys Development Overview The Comforts of Home / CORE development is envisioned as a mixed -use development comprising both a senior living community and site appropriate commercial uses. It offers senior living accommodations including memory care, assisted living and independent living for residents seeking to stay in the community and have access to lifestyle amenities, such as a grocery and other neighborhood -scale retail /commercial services, trails and open space. The Site benefits from large stands of trees. CORE views these stands as amenities important to the success of the development. CORE's plan is to preserve areas of tree stands, replace trees that are lost and enhance the entire site with a comprehensive landscape plan. As has been achieved with CORE's projects in other communities, the intent is to exceed the municipal requirements if possible. Architecturally, CORE will compliment the existing community through the use of materials and design. The townhomes and assisted living structures are designed with traditional gabled roofs and pleasing exterior finishes. The Comforts of Home site layout and design features are open to influence from the surrounding neighborhood's desires and the City's reasonable recommendations. Mr. Jeff Smyser December 13, 2006 Page 4 Progress to Date CORE's submission of its development application for the Site is the next step in the development and re- development of the Hodgson / County Road J area. It provides the City with development details for the Site, as well as insight to the future development and redevelopment of the entire Study Area. Consistency with the Underlying Zoning The underlying zoning of the Site is General Business. By statute, the City's Zoning Ordinance implements the policies of the approved Comprehensive Plan. Minn. Stat. § 473.851(9). The proposed PUD Zoning Ordinance for Comforts of Home will, therefore, implement the policies established in the related Comprehensive Plan for the area located within the Hodgson Road / County Road Study Area. Minn. Stat. § 473.858(1). The City reports in its December 8, 2006 draft of the Hodgson Road / County Road J Master Plan the following: General Business zoning includes a wide variety of businesses including retail, service and semi - industrial uses. They may contain businesses which tend to serve other business and industry as well as those catering to shoppers' needs. Draft Master Planning Study / Hodgson Road and County Road J, December 8, 2006, p.8. The proposed mix of uses within the 17 -acre Comforts of Home planned unit development is consistent with the overall intent of the general business zoning. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the Site as Mixed Use. The City describes the intent of the Mixed Use land use category as follows. The Mixed Use designation is intended to accommodate development that includes a variety of land uses. This could be a development that integrates uses in the same building, such as residential units above commercial space. It also might include different uses in separate elements of a larger development, as part of a master plan. 2002 Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan, p. 97. The proposed Comforts of Home development is consistent with the intent of the City's Mixed Use designation. In addition, the underlying zoning supports many of the proposed uses within the CORE submittal. Compatibility with the Draft Master Planning Study / Hodgson Road and County Road J The City has been proactive in planning for the future of the Hodgson Road / County Road J area. The City states that the "Master Plan is intended to show a general land use arrangement with some specific design elements. The individual site layouts and uses are to be determined as • • • 111 Mr. Jeff Smyser December 13, 2006 Page 5 • part of the development review process, but should be based on the Master Plan, including specific elements contained within the plan. Draft Master Planning Study, Dec. 8. 2006, p. 31 Although the draft Master Plan has not been adopted, it reflects many of the goals of the community and also the proposed CORE development. Contained within the December 8, 2006 Draft Master Planning Study for Hodgson Road and County Road are specific elements. The following are of particular importance to the Comforts of Home / CORE development proposal. 1. Specific instruction that there is to be one full access on Hodgson Road; that the City desires to eliminate all other access points. a. CORE notes: The exact location of the full access ought to be consistent with engineering analysis and address the needs of the neighborhood, the Site, the Study Area, the City and the County. A limited number of right in / right out access points are appropriate for a properly developed area. CORE will work with all the parties involved to establish the most reasonable location for this access. 2. Internal circulation routes are to be created within the development areas — motorized and pedestrian. a. CORE notes: This is central to CORE's proposal. The current Site Plan design shows excellent circulation through the Site supporting the residential and commercial uses and includes the potential for circulation to be enhanced with the redevelopment of the southerly properties, including pedestrian ways within the Site. 3. Development will be limited so as to preserve capacity so that other sites can develop without creating a need for a signal at the new access. a. CORE notes: Traffic analysis shows that regardless which site develops first, by the time the Study Area is fully developed, it is highly likely a signal will be warranted. CORE strongly urges that this be planned for, even if it is not warranted on "day one" opening of the first development. 4. Trail connectivity and pedestrian access along Hodgson Road are essential a. CORE notes: The Comforts of Home / CORE development proposal establishes trail connectivity through the residential components and provides linkages to the commercial uses and Hodgson Road. This is consistent with the Draft Master Planning Study and the City's overall parks and trails plan. • 5. Greenspace buffering is an important design element for new development bordering existing neighborhoods Mr. Jeff Smyser December 13, 2006 Page 6 a. CORE notes: The proposed development benefits greatly from existing tree stands. Neighborhood comments have made it clear that buffering is essential to maintaining quality of life in the area and CORE is committed to achieving it to the fullest extent possible. 6. Municipal utilities are essential to all new development a. CORE notes: The redevelopment and development success of the entire Site relies on the cost - effective and timely delivery of sanitary sewer and public water services. The Comforts of Home development is the best and only available option for the City to achieve the extension of these services. 7. Development should pursue urban form, fronting buildings along Hodgson Road and avoid lining it with parking lots. a. CORE notes: The Comforts of Home / CORE proposal provides some retail building along Hodgson Road, green space to soften the parking lot that lines Hodgson Road, and the senior living building bookends the development along Hodgson Road. 8. Traffic access comparisons between the west and east side; site configuration as an access issue; potential, but not confirmed new public roads to the east. a. CORE notes: Traffic analysis may show the intensity and timing of development of the west or east side is not reliant upon the physical configuration of a Site. Site appropriate development that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and underlying zoning will require thoughtful and measured traffic infrastructure improvements, but such development must not be hampered by the assumption that someday there may be new public roads built on the east side, especially when property owners have made it clear they have no interest in developing their land at this time. 9. Stormwater management a. CORE notes: The Comforts of Home / CORE proposal includes appropriate ponding to meet surface water management needs and the aesthetic desires of the community. Finally, the City acknowledges that the concept plans in the Draft Master Planning Study are inexact and a collection of ideas. Id. p. 25. CORE seeks to continue to work with the City to achieve the goals for the area and urges the City to not adopt concept plans that are still evolving. • • • • • Mr. Jeff Smyser December 13, 2006 Page 7 Comforts of Home Residential Element – Medium Density Residential A combination of senior and assisted living housing types and styles are proposed for Comforts of Home, providing a variety of life -cycle options to residents and homeowners. The development proposal is based directly on the approved Comprehensive Plan. The housing types and densities are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Townhomes CORE is pleased with the amount of interest from quality residential builders seeking to build on this Site. CORE proposes the construction of 24 attached townhomes. Preliminary market response leads CORE to believe that these townhomes may provide workforce housing to housing for empty nesters. The townhomes will be located in areas that provide a buffer between the existing low - density housing and the proposed assisted living facility Assisted Living Comforts of Home provides assisted living, memory care and respite care in a professionally managed, thoughtfully designed setting. Comforts of Home / CORE propose 83 senior living units. Comforts of Home's senior communities are designed to be as home -like as possible. Comforts of Home tailor the level of care to each resident's needs, providing the right help at the right time to enhance each individual's ability to live as independently as possible. The philosophy is simple — to provide quality care to seniors at an competitive price and with a personal touch. The company's mission is to provide living accommodations for seniors where they are happy, comfortable and secure, and looked after with care and respect. Comforts of Home Commercial Element Comforts of Home will provide a neighborhood scale retail and commercial services, including a grocery. These are convenience services for new residents and the existing neighborhood. The proposed grocery includes a fuel island feature. This feature will allow grocery consumers to purchase fuel at discounted prices. This type of fuel service is not a destination service; rather upwards of 80% of these fuel users are already on Site having purchased their groceries. Neighborhood services are envisioned for the development of the smaller retail pads. Potential businesses could be a deli -style restaurant, dry cleaner, professional services such as accounting or insurance, etcetera. These elements are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan for the area and also with the City's recently released citizen survey titled "2005 Quality of Life Survey ". Mr. Jeff Smyser December 13, 2006 Page 8 Parks, Trails and Open Space CORE is proposing trails consistent with the City's connectivity goals. The Site will have green space and open space appropriate to the land use proposed. The Site has pedestrian paths and open space around the townhomes and around the assisted living buildings, including a water feature and pedestrian paths as a focal point. The retail side of the Site has open space to the west of the larger building and also along the entire east side street frontage. In addition, the trail system allows greater access to retail locations. Roads Increased development in the City, including at Comforts of Home, will create a need for a variety of road improvements near this Site. As planned by Anoka County and the City, the intersection at Hodgson Road and County Road J is planned for improvements to include reconfigured lanes and signalization. Additional improvements will be made when the Comforts of Home project is constructed. The improvements may address access, turn lanes, and additional controlled intersections including the possibility of a traffic signal on Hodgson Road. CORE is aware of the need to make improvements to meet the long term traffic needs of the immediate Site, the Hodgson Road / County Road J Study Area and the greater needs of the City and County. CORE is in receipt of the two traffic studies examining the traffic related impacts of the proposed Comforts of Home development and the development and redevelopment of the greater Hodgson Road / County Road J area. On behalf of CORE , a traffic analysis review conducted by Allan Klugman, PE, PTOE, Westwood Professional Services, is submitted with this application. Mr. Klugman reviewed the City's traffic studies as they related to the Comforts of Home / CORE proposal and the greater Hodgson Road / County Road J Study Area. The conclusions and recommendations of this review are summarized below. 1. A traffic signal will eventually be required on Hodgson Road based upon the projected development of the Study Area. 2. If a signal is installed, and with development on both sides of the Study Area, the signal will operate at a good level of service. 3. The spacing of the main access needs to be worked out cooperatively with the City, County, project landowners /developers. 4. If a signal cannot be developed (or takes time to be developed), it is advantageous to have the major traffic generators located on the west side of Hodgson Road. • • • • Mr. Jeff Smyser December 13, 2006 Page 9 Planned Unit Development Application A Planned Unit Development ( "PUD ") will provide the flexibility needed on the Site to maximize natural amenities, preserve existing trees, and provide high - quality mixed -use design. The attached Site Plan and data sheets provide lot, setback, boundary, grading and landscaping information. The data sheets for the planned development confirm Comforts of Home's conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and PUD zoning standards. The City's Zoning Code suggests that general business uses can include retail, grocery, motor fuel /convenience, restaurants, and office. The Mixed Use Comprehensive Plan designation supports medium density residential. CORE seeks to provide a setting for medium density housing combined with complimentary and supporting business uses that serve a neighborhood. The commercial uses will be neighborhood scale and will be consistent with the permitted uses in the City Ordinance. In addition to the Site Plan submittal, the applicant submits additional information consistent with City's requests for consideration of a PUD / preliminary plat approval. Sewer and Water Service The Metropolitan Urban Service Area, or "MUSA," is managed by the Metropolitan Council to ensure that regional services and facilities, such as sewers and major highways, are provided or planned for the seven - county region. The Site has been approved for MUSA. Public sewer or water services do not currently serve the Site. However, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services ( "MCES ") will provide trunk sewer service to the Site. CORE has secured the easements necessary to bring sanitary sewer and public water to the Site. This investment will allow the City to pursue additional development in the Study Area, including the property south of the Site. In addition, the submittal provides information showing how public utilities, drainage and roads can be extended to serve adjacent property. Landscaping Plan Landscaping and planting will be provided throughout the 17 -acre Site in a manner complimentary to the uses proposed. The plan addresses screening and tree replacement requirements. Tree Preservation Plan • A complete tree preservation plan is included confirming trees to be saved and removed. A tree count table totaling trees saved and trees removed is included. Mr. Jeff Smyser December 13, 2006 Page 10 Lighting Plan A lighting plan and photometric study of the Site has been prepared and is submitted. Consistent Site Layouts All of the plans submitted have the same layout for the Site. Floor Plans and Elevations for Housing Product The architectural plans contain complete floor plans and elevations for the assisted living buildings, the single story building linking the assisted living buildings, and the townhomes per Lino Lakes' Subdivision Ordinance, Preliminary Plat § 1004 -1 -8. Plans and elevations for the retail / commercial pads are not yet available nor does the City require them at this time. Building pad and minimum building set backs are shown for all proposed commercial buildings per Lino Lakes' Subdivision Ordinance, Preliminary Plat § 1104 -1 -3. Additional Public Benefits City Parks /Trails In addition to proposing trails winding through the residential component of the Site, the City has the authority to receive fees paid in lieu of land dedication to support the City's overall parks and open space goals. Increased Tax Base The Site is underdeveloped and contributes very little property tax to the City's general fund. As proposed, the Site will dramatically increase the property tax paid to the City. This benefit will be realized immediately as the project does not rely on tax increment financing or any other public subsidy. Quality of Life The City's Quality of Life Study shows that there is a desire to see future development to address core quality of life issues. The Comforts of Home / CORE proposal can assist the City in achieving some of these citizen requests. 1. Transportation Improvements. The community wants to achieve traffic safety improvements at Hodgson Road and County Road J. Coordinating the improvements planned for this intersection and the development to the north will achieve access management and planning for increasing traffic in the area. • • • • • • Mr. Jeff Smvser December 13, 2006 Page 11 Neighborhood Commercial Centers. The community indicated a strong preference for neighborhood scale commercial centers. The Comforts of Home / CORE proposal offers this. In addition to the proposed retail / service establishments desired by the community, the proposed grocery store is consistent with the community's shopping preferences as revealed through the survey. 3. Senior Living. The community survey shows that the City's residents believe there are too few senior living housing options. The development of Comforts of Home will address the need for quality senior housing accommodations. Utilities The Comforts of Home / CORE proposed development will bring sanitary sewer and public water to an area that is not currently served by infrastructure. This infrastructure will serve the Site, provide infrastructure that is necessary to achieve redevelopment of distressed properties, and make infrastructure available to the remainder of the Study Area. Conclusion CORE Development Services looks forward to working with the City Council, Planning Commission and City staff to realize a shared vision for the Comforts of Home development. While we are excited about the opportunity to pursue a mixed -use community within the City, we are equally pleased to assist the City in achieving several important regional benefits relating to transportation, utility infrastructure and life -cycle housing. Pete J. Coyle, for offman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. Remi Stone, for Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1110758.1 0 1 20' BUILDING SETBACK LL RLYe4YO LAOS u I PUBLIC TRAIL LOT 2 E1LAA0 OWNER Y GRAMMY ENV DEVELOPER CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1793 BUERKLE CIRCLE WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55170 PHONE: (657) 481 -9027 ARCHITECT: F •R • I• S• B• I• E "CRITIC'''. 1 W C 215 NORTH SECOND STREET, SUITE 204 RIVER FALLS, W7 54022 PHONE: (715) 426 -4908 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR 1671 COUNTY HIGHWAY 10 N.E. SPRING LAKE PARK, MINNESOTA 55432 PHONE: (763) 780 -4100 SITE DESCRIPTION AREA OF PROPERTY = 17.18 ACRES AREA OF UPLAND = 16.72 ACRES AREA OF WETLAND = 0.46 ACRES AREA OF COUNTY R.O.W. - 1.27 ACRES 5 PROPOSED LOTS ZONING EXISTING ZONING = NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS PROPOSED ZONING = P. U.D LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lod 4, Auditors Subdivision No 107, Anoko County, Minnesota: And The port of Lot 22. Auditor's ' Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesolo, lying Easterly of the Westerly 50 feet thereof and lying between the Westerly extensions of the North and South lines of Lot 4. said Auditor's Subdivision No. 107. SETBACKS COUNTY HIGHWAY PARKING 15 FT BUILDING 40 FT. ADJACENT LOTS PARKING 10 FT. BUILDING 20 FT. FUTURE COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY 40' BUILDING SETBACK 15' PARKING SETBACK \ \ \ \ L— — — — NOTE: BLANKET EASEMENTS OUTSIDE ALL PROPOSED BUILDING LINES FUTURE COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY \ II LI Ii \ PROPOSED EASEMENTS TO \ 1! BE ACOUIRED F011 UTILITIES ;I I 1t11 ',) RWOrxnr .flail \ 20' BUILDING SETBACK! \ -- —.i RIW18RE7 AAC04 LIMY IA4T-0RWWY RAT M 4a L FUTURE COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY FUTURE COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY CaAR AC32 1 1 _- __ - -__ S 0 100 206 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 100 FEET (22" X 34- SHEET) 1 INCH = 200 FEET (11 x 17" SHEET) FILE COPT PUBLIC TRAILS TRAIL EASEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT FOR ALL PUBLIC TRAILS AND WALKWAYS. TYPICAL TRAIL EASEMENTS ARE TO BE 12 FEET IN WIDTH LOT DESCRIPTION AND USE LOT 1 GROSS ACREAGE - 3.99 - SENIOR HOUSING (APARTMENTS) LOT 2 GROSS ACREAGE = 3.83 - SENIOR HOUSING (TOWNHOM£S) NET ACREAGE = 3.37 LOT J CROSS ACREAGE = 714 - SUPERMARKET LOT 4 GROSS ACREAGE = 0.57 - RETAIL LOT 5 GROSS ACREAGE = 0.50 - RETAIL CIT IN C kr\--PASCE ENCINEERo lNC, INC. ® QVIL ENGINEERS • iAN SURVEYORS OF C ORI DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION Y„xFNry.• MINNEAPOLIS • HUDSON , CAMBRI06E (763)780.4100 (715)381 -1150 (763)689-4042 W W W.pOSSe -0M9.Calll =OR RirIM�rpp�D ITT R Mn. i 6 ePrtge ��`N�Xpa IM Tj� 4 MR DATE REVISIONS BY 7LI2/06 ; 9778 017 COMMEN76 - 6/23/06 12,112L06 RV R-5UB.T P.u.D. PARR nTrscRWR RECORD DRAWING COMFORTS OF HOME PRELIMINARY PLAT R. �1 1 •� • • PROPOSED FUTURE$ RIGHT OF WA Y • yr cm C 1. = ._COMPORTS-OF HOME . _PROP SED DEVELOPMEl1 _— ) c ) c c ) N I PROPOSED RICHT OF WAY 1 S07 °7939"4' 316.3 EXISTING RICHT OF WA Y PROPOSED FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED FUTURE MEDIAN PROPOSED FU TURF CURB ON NEW PROPOSED ROADWAY EXISTING 8/TUMINOUS EDGE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 (CITY OF UNO LAKES •TE REVISIONS 8Y _7 W/6 1 — R718_ pfY COMMENTS - 6/23/716 _12212 /716 L —R11 _ RESUBMIT P.U.O. - - -1 - -- - -- L - -- - - -1 - -- SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 50 FEET (22" X 34" SHEET) 1 INCH = TOO FEET (77 X 77" SHEET) CIT IN CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION SZ— PASSE ENGINEERING, INC. O a`"' r"�`� Rµ Y' q CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS � T —n MINNEAPOLIS • HUDSON • CAMBRIDGE (763)780 -4100 (715)381 -1150 (763)689 -4042 www.passe-eng.com Iv IT a.mr rxe LIXIM —J- - -- RECORD /)RAWINC - OF NOME FUTURE CONS7RLCT7ON OF HODGSON ROAD PT a MN SCALE vROtc. • Sse -as P2 NOTES I) Inc orientation of this bearing system is based on the north line 01 the Southwest Ovvrto of the Southeast Ouorler of Section 32, Township 3(N, Range 22W, which a assumed 10 hove o beo,ing of South 88' 28' 57- East 2) Existing public and private utiities. services. and underground structures shown hereon were located either physically. from existing records. or by resident 700700ony and are provided for informational purposes only Omer public and primate .70ilies ond services moy be present. Verification and location of all utilities should be obtained ram the owners of me respective utilities prior to any excavation. 3) Existing conduit shown along easterly property boundary contains telephone lines per Gopher One slat. Call utility locates. The number and t)pe of lines ore unknown Verification and mention of all utilities should be obtained from the owners of the respective utilities prior to any excomation 4) The property described hereon is zoned Genera! Business (GB). The following minimum setbacks apply to 0,00 .17 zoned GET (Per City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance- Amended per 078 27 -03) From Streets :: Principal Building Non Loen! Street = 30 Net Principal Building from Collector or Arterial Street = 40 Net Parking Lot/Driiewoy = 75 feel. Rea lad: Principal Budding = 30 0eel. Accessory Building = 5 Net Parking Lot = 10 leer Side Turd. Principe! Building = 10 Net Accessory Building = 10 feet Parking Lot = 70 feet. From Residenliol District = 35 feel Between Principal Buildings = Not Nss thou one -hall (1/2) the sum of the budding heights of the two (2) buildings. 5) The properly described hereon is in Flood Zone C (areas of minimal flooding) per Federal Emergency Management Agency Community Panel Na. 770015-0010 B. doled May 17. 1982. 6) The legal description and easement information shown hereon were obtained from Chicago Title Insurance Company. Issued by its Agent. Land Tae, Inc., Commitment Case No. 259146, doled duly 73. 2005. 7) The oreo of the properly described hereon is 748.317 s9uore feel a 77.18 8) No evidence It= the 10cofion of the septic system was found near the existing residence. There may also be on 000itianol we/I on properly for the existing residence. No evidence arcs found of an additional residential well. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 4, Auditors Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County. Minnesota: And The port of Lot 22. Auditors Subdivision No. 107. Anoka County. Minnesota. lying Easterly of the Westerly 50 feel thereof and lying between the Westerly extensions of the North and South lines of Lai 4. said Auditors Subdivision No. 107 CERnFlCAnwN I hereby certify Mal this survey eras prepared by Inc or under my direct supK0skan, and that I am 0 duly registered land surveyor under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota. Mork 7 000,07 0200, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 25287 LEGEND Date.' • DENOTES FOND RON PR( NONNON1 2X11055 0000000 Nola rod DENOTES Van. Wear POE • DENOTES (PST. car 04E • DENOTES ENSTOL NELL • 00NO(CS [aSTNC FLARED ENO scn0N/0.5KNr O DENOTES (05100 s00,TAar 11400010 e DENOTES (05700 (LLC70CA( OUTLET • DENO. CaSIK TELEMIONC PEDESTAL • DENOTES (NSW TELERNGK NwNOLE ▪ 0[NO7ES (0S7NC (RER4ASS WS 000010 DENOTES (NSOC 947 DENOTES (051NC NAIL BOX DENOTES (0,01010 2.0" ROAD N(7A( POST - — — - DENOTES (0S7NG 0AN4E ANa 01PLITY (A0NENT PER RAT Cr 0050ROCE ESTATES —err— 0000705 (a51NG UND(RO 1000 7(L(PINK LK (COLONT 0M 0007005 LINES- APPROMMATE 2000(0) DENOTES (100700 00(RCROAD ELECTRIC LK (0'00004TC 70000 ) DENOTES Ea57NG 100(0074AD us LK (APP0Or0u1C Lou0W) DENOTES (051NG M'O(RORCYAD FIVER OPTIC LK 7400.0000401 10047,0,) DENOTES ElanNS STOW SEWN DENOTES CanMC SAN MT SNER DENOTES (0SIK OVER WAD UTILITIES DENOTES [K OK FENCE LK DENOTES EXMTK BO(ONG DENOTES EOS10C MU900 007/014 112 AREA 0(00165 (057NC CONCRETE •LSTEeLe EXTE05W O M( M(RIT LK 6 tor 4, AumbonT 9(®IwSNw NO 7D7, .I BMLOAr07 W 911- , PD: Jr 5, -I2 -R -0004 T • I MAR. ROBERT f BETTY ANN 56AS RW NNE NO inn RfOtt Ux PIPE 'NOK (CNer L KIRIN 0040 0, PROPENE, LK 5 IRON PPE • • .. .. NWLNENT 0 FENCE lK mowM - OPANAE AND .I Or PROPERTY LK •' 0X(00400 44 92 07040(40417111 -) - 02(9005 W 910 P10. )n- J,- zi- 42 -W20 0(R RI♦T G - I I PD J,- J, -12 -12 -0019 20, 701055 t P♦iRW RW4NC a4X5 �I I rc0A0E0R 008000 f 4;. r'�' -".5 I 1 SRB7B 31-E 1013, 9J y/ l I.,./ 9915 AUDpRINERIT LK O LOT .. I ITORS 500 0(5ER NO 707 ; r I[// NORM LK O" Sp)l00S1 -' 7 .' _ PEP, DAN EASEMEN L- ♦AGOEEME.T PER pOC No Sams 50 OF AK BUEDNL5 W 07E PID 31- 31-12 -42 -0010 FENCE IK NORM NOS(NMAL PETER 6RKPERTYIK- 1 r FENCE LK NORM Or PROPER'''. (K O5t BuAPNGS W 9E( PD A_L -Z) -12 -011 WPmI. rROVNE a NALLAE } - - (ENE LK SOUTH OF PROPERTY 101 t I R RESRRIY LAVE CR EAST So - FEET 0r 100 22. MOnOPT SVBOw9W NO 107 ) CONCRETE PAD AND PELL - 2100 TREE 0 1 1: l�N NOT MIND 410 MB -00T CELINA EN70Ax0 - -GAS METER CARED AEn( 00E RESERMXI ACCESS FOR" UNO(RTAOLID FUEL O. MAR PAO EASTERLY LNE Or EAST SO FEET Or LOT n. AwftONS SuBOn9W NO 107 ORIOnG •1 (SE 0(740) h Oc \\ \ \ , ■ l \ \ \ IRON PPPE - LNODN(5ENE NO Liar \ s't'y a "p1 \ °g za \ v\ \ g UROV PPE ayRENT NO 1.7.731 CARE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION PASSE ENQINEERINC, lNC'• CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS MINNEAPOLIS • HUDSON • CAMBRIDGE (763)780 -4100 (715)381 -5150 (763)689 -4042 www.pdsse- e119.COT \ \ ORIVE047 - 3 ------------ 1 _ 1 7 IRE LK 19801700000 TELLPN5NE _! CONDUIT (SE NOES) 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ V ^ Ravi pp( NWLVENT •A Nil Lis, EASIER(, 50 FEET O 101 .2I - �--AUORRT sL'BOVZON via. son 001° \ \ \\ \\ \\ r sr' Ra \ GDI.NN OF STATE AD R AVA r via 9 DWI T NAY PER AWkABLL < COUNTY 4-COON NAPS P?en ▪ )I- 3I- 22- 4J -00J0� SONTAG. a � m A \ ' l se b0 MONUMENT NO ,2.251 1. 1, 1a 111 1 (ENE LK SOWN Or EASTERLY LINE Or LOT 4, 1 AUnrIENS SUBO7905 NO :Or PROPERTY LK 1St 00d^.E OF 9IULOIOII5 SWRORLY LK OF LOT ', _ NORTH a PROPERTY lK 1 AUDITORS SUBOr09W NO. 07 - NOP PNW PNE 1 A20�uW2WENT, 1 ■ �. -- --- - -- ----- 1 2.a)5t -- ._. -;1; I I� BU000405 W 970 ro T- 31-22 -43-0477, WGCIQNCr N B • KATHLEEN 000001 EX0N50 0( ME I I 1 SWMERLY LINE Cr 207 4. • AUDITORS Sm01090A1 Nil. tot NOEPOZY71w 499.71 0LNONC5 W 517E J,- J, -12 -45 -0006 KILO.. SOUTH OP OW LAND ILL PROPERTY LK 1.33 eSnnn772A 5008 L0 W 9E 6WLP.G SOWN 00 IND J) _SI_22 -4J -OOPS PROPERTY lK LDS YAK L. f 'AA TANG RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 CITY O LINO LAKES K 3,- J, -22 -44-0070 PA500Sq 00IQ KOHL. ROBERT • IATRI(XA COIFORIS OF B PRELAI%NARY PLAT CERT1R4TE OF SURVEY Num sour LEGEND kW lsanli fine sandy loam THIS NEARLY LEVEL SOIL 15 IN SMALL DEPRESSIONS, ON NARROW RIMS SURROUNDING LARGE AREAS OF ORGANIC SOILS, AND IN NARROW LOW -LYING DRA /NAGEWA YS AREAS ARE 5 TO BO ACRES IN SIZE. THE WATER TABLE 15 HIGH. SLOPES ARE 0 TO 2 PERCENT. INCLUDED WITH THIS SOIL IN MAPPING AREAS ARE SOILS THAT CONTAIN STRATA OF COARSE SAND. ALSO INCLUDED ARE SMALL AREAS OF MARKEY AND LINO SOILS. THE CHEIF LMIITA7/ONS FOR BOTH FARM AND URBAN USE ARE THE HIGH WATER TABLE AND THE RESULTING HAZARD OF WETNESS. MOST AREAS ARE PASTURED. SOME DRAINED AREAS ARE CROPPED. COMMONLY GROWN CROPS ARE CORN AND SOYBEANS. Sal &M rvae We sand 010 3 moment slopes THIS NEARLY LEVEL TO GENTLY SLOPING SOIL 15 IN SMALL LOW -LYING DRAINAGEWAYS AND SMALL DEPRESSIONS ON LOW BROAD FLATS AND IN SMALL AREAS THAT ARE A FEW FEET HIGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING LARGER, VERY POORLY DRAINED AREAS AREAS ARE 4 TO 60 ACRES IN SIZE. IN UNDISTURBED AREAS, THE SURFACE LAYER IS 2 TO 6 INCHES THICK INCLUDED WITH THIS SOIL IN MAPPING ARE AREAS OF 5003 THAT ARE NOT MOTTLED WITHIN A DEPTH OF 30 INCHES AND AREAS OF LINO SOILS. THE MODERATELY HIGH WATER TABLE AND THE RESULTING HAZARD OF WETNESS ARE THE MAJOR LIMITATIONS FOR BOTH FARM AND URBAN USE. DURING DRY PERIODS SOIL BLOWING IS A HAZARD TO IMMATURE CROPS. MOST AREAS ARE USED FOR CROPS, TO WHICH THE SOIL 15 MODERATELY WELL SUITED. COMMONLY GROWN CROPS ARE CORN AND SOYBEANS Znd r/M/M Wen Ere sad 2 to 6 parcanl Mopes THIS GENTLY UNDULATING SOIL IS IN BROAD OUTWASH AREAS 5 TO 760 ACRES IN S1ZE. IT HAS THE PROFILE DESCRIBED AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SERIES INCLUDED WITH THIS SOIL IN MAPPING ARE SMALL DEPRESSIONS OF ISANT/ SOILS ALSO INCLUDED ARE SMALL AREAS OF SARTELL SOILS. THE LOW AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY AND THE RESULTING HAZARDS OF SOIL BLOWING AND DROUGHT /NESS ARE LIMITATIONS FOR BOTH FARM AND URBAN USE. LARGE AREAS ARE UNDER URBAN DEVELOPMENT. THIS SOIL IS WELL SUITED TO THIS USE. IT IS POORLY SUITED TO CORN AND SOYBEANS, MODERATELY WELL SUITED TO ALFALFA AND PASTURE AND MODERATELY WELL SUITED TO WOODLAND. NOTES ALL LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF SOIL TYPE CLASSIFICATIONS PER 7HE SOIL SURVEY OF ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (PREPARED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE IN COOPERATION W1 7H THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION). VICINITY MAP NO NW 7 —�- SEC 31 T3/N. R22W CITY OF LINO LAKES MN CARE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION PASSE ENQINEERINQ, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS MINNEAPOLIS • HUDSON • CAMBRIDGE ( 763) 780 -4100 (775)381 -1150 (763)689 -4042 WWw.pCSSC.Png.com s RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 CFTY OF UNO LASS COMFORTS OF HOME PRELIMINARY PLAT AERUL / SOILS 566 -W 62 • k' \• \J� r1 ▪ 6.7 \� \ \\ \ 5 DIT iii PARKING 0' REGRADE\\R 'R YA DIRECT R 70 STRUCTUR, REGRADE LOTLINE AR TO CREATE EOF AT 896. 690.57 N GA DEN - INF 1 OCK''1 PR'QP0 D RETAIN VG LOT ,31 WAL2 F.F.E. 905.0 co 903.7 0) F 50 I I \ 6983 *-- 905 ]a�� I7 TH HALF OF ROOF -- PUM ,AD 907. �J r INS TO RAIN POND ,3 - C Nit 895.5 = 907.9 '\ EOF = 902,4 10:`( BENCIE = 896.'5 -895.5 9432 0 0.0 'x(11 4-- 90q 90 --8 a Y GB -: e9sn err eel 23 TRE(ICH LOADING a °' ST -4 DOCKS , 901.0 ,' SOUTH HALF OF ROOF DRAINS TO RAIN 9� GARD N > 906-- 'l POSED ,R4T INING wALi\ Pf SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN AT \R BUILDINGS ARE LOW OPENING ELEVATIONS \ \ (898.6,0 , \ \ \D/TCH)Nk \ \ \ INTERNAL ROOF DRAIN TO RAIN GARDEN F.F.E. 905.6-- •CURB CUT cs .905 40' BUILDING SETBACK (904.9 DITCH) 15' PARKING SETBACK (904.5 DITCH) IRAIN GARDEN ,ELEV = 902.0 0 60 720 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 60 FEET (22- X 34" SHEET) 1 INCH = 120 FEET (11 • X 17" SHEET) /NFL TRA BON AREA 1 TO OVERFLOW INTO INFILTRATION AREA 2 II 0'- F.F.E 906. C LOT 4 W 7 (904 7 DITCH) (904.3 DITCH) RAIN GARDEN ELEV = 902.0 rXs^ 014.3; (9g4.1) yl-- - I -� A SOIL BORINGS BORING DEPTH GROUND WATER ELEVATION SOIL BORING ST- 1 15.5' 899. 7 57 -2 15.5' 896.1 5T -3 15.5" 895.9 ST -4 15.5" 894.7 ST -5 15.5" 894.7 S7 -6 NOT PERFORMED NOT PERFORMED 5T -7 15.5" 897.0 S7 -8 15.5" NONE OBSERVED 5T -9 15.5• NONE OBSERVED ST -TO NOT PERFORMED NOT PERFORMED ASH STREET SOIL TYPE DESCRIPTION SOIL BORING ST- 7 ST -2 ST -3 5T -4 5T -5 5T -6 5T -7 ST -8 5T -9 ST- 10 SOIL TYPE POORLY GRADED SAND POORLY GRADED SAND POORLY GRADED SAND POORLY GRADED SAND POORLY GRADED SAND NA POORLY GRADED SAND POORLY GRADED SAND POORLY GRADED SANG NA ti ST ALBAN /S S III I - - l �/ ANOKA COUNTY RIGH87OF- -WAY PLAT NO. 48 Jy�' 006 - - CSAH NO. 32 - - GSON ROAD) I � J GALVANIZED GRATE (SPLIT) 4" X 4" OPEMNG5 NORMAL WATER ELEVATION 12" MIN7 \_PIPE SIZE AND LENGTH WI VARY GOING 1N70 P090 000110(15E5 SHALL BE GROUTED ON 901N THE OUTSIDE AND INSIDE TYPICAL POND SKINNER NW IV SCALE PIPE SIZE e7LL VARY NORMAL WATER ELEVATION ROUND ALL SEWED «TERSECTIV5 PPROK TOT 9ORE\ CURB AND GUTTER 0--t- 3' 0. EXPOSED AGGREGATE 1- T OR FLATTER CONCRETE WALK SECDON A -A Q 51864(0 TREATMENT - AFTER NORMAL CONCRETE TlN19NNG. EMBED AGGREGATE. M6E7ING THE REONREM(NTS ff SPEC 3737 CA TD 80011790 TO 700 S O THE MATERIAL 1/2" 70 3/8- N WE W THE GREEN CONCRETE. THE EMBEDDED AGGREGATE SHALL PROTRUDE AT (EAST 3/16" ABOK RE CONCRETE SURF41 THE EXPOSED AGGREGATE MAY BE LIGH77 R55ED TD WASH MORTAR OFF Or IT PEDEB7RWV CL AB RAMP Seel NOTE ITRIFY FIRE SERVICE LOCATIONS AND SIZES 07H CITY FIRE MARSHALL. NOTE: 50D ALL DISTURBED DRAINAGE AREAS, INCLUDING SWALES. AROUND STORM SEWER FLARED END SECTIONS AND OFF STREET CATCH BASINS NOTE: THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MUST BE CONTACTED FOR INSPECTION OF ALL UTILITY WORK PERFORMED. NOTE: SPOT ELEVATIONS AT GUTTERLINE UNLESS 0THERWT5E NOTED. NOTE. REFERENCE SITE PLAN BY ARCHITECT FOR PARKING @ BUILDING DIMENSIONS. ETC NOTE B -672 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ALONG ALL EDGES OF PARKING LOT TO 87 DETERMINED BY SOILS ENGINEER 1.5" BITUMINOUS NEAR COURSE. Mn D07 2341 1.5- BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, Mn 007 2331 4• Mn DOT CLASS V AGGREGATE BASE ACCEPTABLE SUB NOTE: TYPE C55 -I TACK COAT SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN BITUMINOUS LIFTS. NOTE: THE PARKINGLO7 SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR 70 PLACING THE TACK COAT. PARKING LOT WEAVED NO7 70 SCALE 1/2 20" TYPE B -612 CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER RADII ONL Y R DEC 1 3 200E IN NOTE PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE TO BE SLAB ON GRADE EXCEP 7 FOR UNDERGROUND PARKING FOR APARTMENT COMPLEX. CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION PASSE ENQINEE'tNQ, INC• ant_ ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS MINNEAPOLIS • HUDSON ,„ CAMBRIDGE (763)780 -4107 (715)381 -1150 (763)689.4042 IYWW.passG- EI19.GOm DATE REVISIONS BY 2/11C 1 _ RNB - - OTT COMMENTS - 5/13/06 _2/11_ A18 - W750 COMMENTS _ 211ZZO 1 _ A' 5750 COMMENTS - 7 /I4 /•- 6 2/25/06_ 1- Aa_? W75D COMMENTS - 7/21/06 1/4103 1 _ Awe WTSD COMMENTS - 7/T I/0- 6 _ 4/W06_ O6 1 RESUBMIT 6.710. - -___- RECORD DRAWING COIFORTS OF M PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN DRAM RAD SG. AROLCr ase -m KATE REVISIONS sy _ 111216 1 _ 7148 OTT COMMENTS - 6/23/06 ./T1 1_ A RCS WTS5 COMMENTS 2/ W01. 1_ ARV__ W150 COMMENTS - 7/14/.. 1210 1_ A W+L WTSD COMMENTS - 7/21/06 /11206 1 - A»+ WT50 COMMENTS - 8/11/06 _ T7I7061_ R_V RESUBMtr P.U.O. RECORD DRAWING OAIFORM OF L/� PRE GRADING PLAN ORAN. SCALE J '/I 0, \ I iD O � I o (901.1 DITCH) \ \ I .I 1 ! I` �\.• I • 10 1 -900-POND ,7 NWL 900.0 HNC =902.1 EOF • 902.6 JQ: 1 BENCH 1 900.0 -699.0 I I �qO2 (47 .vJ ,'BJ I1fil -I 1;J (800.2) J le I in, -1 in lil 903.8 V N ' 900.3 1 ( Doti I_„ 1_ • II \•• • I! I. 4`.1 BERM ,(7) 90 5 RA/NGARBJ' 70 OL£RF.k. T POND 2 A- DITCH) ( F Q \ OUTLET / .5734ETUR \ 900.0 X98.51 LI C�4 . TRAIL muf (899. LOT2 BERM @ 900.0 /FR ELEVATION O/ 3/JAN ELEVATION, - 894 902 4- 00 • J '907.8 0' 901.5 \9 -D POND n NWL • 903.0 HWL - 905.5 EOF, 4 905.6 10:11 BENCH - 601.0 -902.0 RAINGARDEN TO 0 R 10 PON --X d AP- 90 a-- r4°'At41151 IZ� toc 1 ■7 --LOT , sr -e . INTERNALOF� I DRAINS TO F.F. E. 90 0 RAIN GARDEN .1.91 �) WETLAND DELINEATION* BY GRAHAM E1/I CURB. 0.2) 4X (90 0• . O 0 VI I \[ 1v\ / ` \ \ \ \ ' 2 6 5 0 5 a I 1' 1 � 1 71(904. 1 DITCH) (904.6 DITCH) It II H II I X 0 11 O 111, Y. X i 904.0\ 0 SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN AT REAR BUILDINGS ARE LOW OPENING £LEVA TIONS RECRADE LOTLINE AR TO CREATE EOF AT 896. 8901 NA-TH HALF OF ROOF O " INS TO RAIN G' DEN - INF 1 URB CUT OCK 'I PR`QP0 'ED RET/4IN(VC LOT 3' WALL F.F.E. 905.0 POND 3 -E< _ -' - NWL • 896.5 15tWL • 90.9 '\ EOF = 90 4 10:1 BENCI - 896.5 -895.5 !95 41 on 891 IJ 89. d 96 8 \(896.ji_ . `DITCH) • \ \\- - CS 5 eW.Bi \\ TRENCH ph. `I LOnA�D�I[N� G a° DOCKS /- -906' 901.0 ; SOUTH HALF OF ROOF k- DRAINS TO RAIN GARD N > 10 O 01 40' BUILDING SETBACK 0 2 • ' O r (904.5 DITCH) (904.9 DITCH) - (9051 DITCH) • (905.4 DITCH) (905.3 DITCH) (904.9 DITCH) 15' PARKING SETBACK T -903.0 POSED / -5?; • ,RETAINING • IRQR n NOTE' YEW Y FIRE SERMCE LOCA T /OJS AND SIZES 60 T or PRE MARSHALL. NOTE: NOTE- 50D ALL DISTURBED DRAINAGE AREAS. INCLUDING SWAGES AROUND STORM SEWER FLARED END SEC DONS AND OFF STREET CATCH BASINS NOTE: THE CI TY'S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MUST BE CONTACTED FOR INSPECTION OF ALL UTILI TY WORK PERFORMED. NOTE: SPOT ELEVATIONS AT GUT TERL WE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED NOTE: REFERENCE 517E PLAN Br ARCHITECT FOR PARKING & BUILDING DIMENSIONS. ETC. PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE TO BE SLAB ON GRADE EXCEPT FOR UNDERGROUND PARKING FOR APARTMENT COMPLEX ( INTERNAL ROQF DRAI TO RAIN GARDEN F.F.E. ROOF DRAIN 1 F.F.E 906. LOT /RAIN GARDEN ,ELEV = 902.0 • (904.7 DITCH) (904.3 DITCH) 0 60 120 SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH A 60 FEET (22' X 34" SHEET) 1 INCH = 120 FEET (11- X 17" SHEET) INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF RAIN GARDEN DURING CONS TRUCTION PLAN DNGS - SEE LIST 8EL09 RAIN GARDEN DETAIL T O 5' SPAONG (WITH OUTLET STRUCTURE) 9107 FLOW 500 AROUND RAIN GARDEN 2 ROLLS WIDE UNOWPACIED NA nK SOIL IERRAN 70 516W Arr \ / It' 1 ^ I.IL DI�I DEPRESS RAN GARDE N 6" MN FROM SURF p'MI RECOMENDED PLANTS: PMw 0/0ILE HEAD DA rut r OBOTENr PLANT WERT& r &GROUT GERANIUM 905TA ROYAL STANDARD" REGOMENOED 040146S 87401 0100(8(857 RED-OSIER DOG.DLO Ow BU50 Nov EMoor ANNABELLE 97DRANGEA :1 MAX SIOESLOPL 2" DEEP SINGLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH 501L MIXTURE: NO WANG OF 5ANDY SOILS 40X SEMI - COURSE WASHED OR NAnK SAND. .50I MNOOT 08405 2 COMPOSE AND 30Z NAM& TOP50A(87 Mo0UMEA INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF RAN GARDEN WRING CONSTRUCTION PLANINGS - SEE LIST BELOW RAIN GARDEN DETAIL PLANT • 5' SPACING (WITHOUT OUTLET STRUCTURE) / o_Y SOD AROUND RAIN CARDEN 2 ROLLS WIDE UNCOMPAC TED NA DK SOIL DEPRESS RAN CARDEN 6" MIN FROI SURROUNDING TERRAIN RECOMENDED PLANTS PINK TURTLE HEAD 041727 OBEDIENT PLAN T nCERLII r BIGROO5 0(5411 AI H05TA 'ROYAL SFANO/RD RECOMENOED SHRUBS BLACK CHOrEBERRY RED -OSIER 000•00 LOW BU55 HONEYSUCKLE L ABELLE HYOR4NGE4 SHEET Row. :1 MAX SIDE5LOPE 2" DEEP SINGLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SOIL MIXTURE: NO MINING OF SANDY SOILS 40X SEMI - COURSE WASHED OR NA TINE SAND. 30X 'ANDOT GRADE 2 COMPOSE AND 30X NARK 70P507(81 YDLUME). RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 CITY OF UNO LAKES C I T OF IN o " KE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION CORE AWE ENINERING, CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS MINNEAPOLIS „ HUDSON A CAMBRIDGE ( 763) 780-4100 (715)381 -1150 (763)689-4042 www.passe- eng.com OR REPORT RA5 SGT SAVER,. tARS uem Br'L 87 M2i Fx IeOER IRE OAR MARK KRErSGRMR 1 MATERIALS SANITARY 8" MAIN - SOR 35 SERVICE - SCHEDULE 40 WATERMAIN 8" CL 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE 6" CL 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE SERVICE - 1" TYPE K COPPER ALL 8" SANITARY MAIN 0 0.40X \i I I ced i\ \ \ ( \ / \ ,- 1 POND 2 NN. = 900.0E 11115 =902.717 EOE - 902.6 70:1 BENCH 1 900.0 -899.0 ROAM LANE 11 TEMPORARY L1fTLAND IMPACT PERMIT REOUIRED 1 L_ POND 1 0116 _ 903.0 WNL 101 1 905.5 = 9056 0�] BENCH - 901.0 -902.0 Ii, MYFA6 MM EXISTING B� SANITARY SEWER EXISTING 8' WATERMAIN CONNEC7I TO EXISTING' 8- WATERMAIN 1 i LOT 2 • 900.0 ETLANO DELNEA BY GRAHAM ENV DIRECTIONALLY BORE WATERMAIN ALONG COUNTY ROAD 49. WATERMAIN UNDER CSAH 49 TO BE DIRECTIONALLY BORED WITH A STEEL CASING. EXISTING TRAIL 0 TRENCH DRAIN \\ { \ Y^ CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" WATERMAIN PROPOSED FORCEM*IN UTILITY STUBS To SOUTH PR0 SED 8" WA AIN F� JpTUR£ CONNEC I , 1 EASEMENT 10 BE A 1C0 Ntu • t L I1!I 1 11111 1 ! 11' LL ' +1 CORE PASSE ENVNEE INC, We. CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS MINNEAPOLIS HUDSON - CAMBRIDGE (763)780-4100 (715)381 -1150 (763)689-1042 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION W W W.pasSB- E/19.00T 100 200 SCALE IN 65(7 1 INCH 1" X I INCH — 200 FEET (22 3 FEET (11 " M 4" 7" SHEET) RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 t-rnr of UFO LAKES n0. 0(000111 Dalr MOW RRC ISCOMER o0 M8oiRR MN, T.T DATE REVISIONS BY JL72106 ; R49 CITY COMMENTS - 6/23/061 i9/12L06 Ems_ RESUBMIT P710. RECORD DRAWING COMFORTS OF HOME PRELIMINARY URL ITY PLAN n SCNC Mod e 1C0' / 6e -0.5 R. 1)1 POND 2 NML 9000) MNL - 902 1) EDF - 902.61 10 1 BENCH T 900 0 -899.0 PPVD I 903.0 01- 11110 50 10L - 905.5 (OF - 905.6 10:7 BENCH - 901.0 -902.0 • viols 90001 M M SIC ►a Ors eyes 9.4- 44.1 17 9C. we I5 ©,. . 44.444. :. -N..:. 146.. 1043. 36.. 3601 lot ine mei TaaSE OF OMANIES TOO LE OF OUPAMCS IVIW N Io-. 0011£15. 9096 a 000104M1 4601. 6..6 9 .50.9' COTS N .SHIT 0 4 1 Q ON oro I . C s (Cu.. o.M R C u r °�2- u. . m 311. o.Ga . 4654. 5• .0IC . Cu (n3 '5 9 N L' a 42 MI 5 5 l9 10 15 1: 29 4 2A 5.9 i9 T 53 71 9.5 1 12.9 1. 22 :a 5.1 IJ T .A 65 •i aA 55 !3 In 1.. 1113 19.1 2.1 5] sn 5 .0 is u 5S 5.7 5 f.9 a 73 Is 1 .l MA 245 21 3A �.9 .5 55 7! 9.2 12.9 TOO LE OF OUPAMCS IVIW N Io-. 0011£15. 9096 a 000104M1 4601. 2' BERN 8 SILT FENCE y SILT FENCE -6" MINIMUM 1 1/2' CLEAR AGGREGATE .ADDITIONAL AGGRECA 7E PILE TO BE KEPT ON SITE TO REFRESHEN EN TRANCE AFTER SOILING GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WITH BERM AND SILT FENCE NOT TO SCALE SAIL BORING;' BORING DEPTH 457 5 ap9' 1S,.I }� 95..E « 1�1 L Itt) 9 0M. �...: c,., If4 9441. CM.... m.l(94".9.4. 5" Owl. o..i. Rc,. .Y6. 6" 9.a. ..fie 004 Raw.. ��. ... a r 5 SI .2 11 TO 59 5.s 2 9.5 17 i A II 5.9 Ss 59 4465 100 ;11 lsu ,0 Spa 52 55 lA 192 52'3 a.a 09 5s 75 4-; ■24 2' BERN 8 SILT FENCE y SILT FENCE -6" MINIMUM 1 1/2' CLEAR AGGREGATE .ADDITIONAL AGGRECA 7E PILE TO BE KEPT ON SITE TO REFRESHEN EN TRANCE AFTER SOILING GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WITH BERM AND SILT FENCE NOT TO SCALE SAIL BORING;' BORING DEPTH GROUND WATER ELEVATION SOIL BORING 5T -1 75.5' 899.1 5T -2 15.5' 896.1 5T -3 75.5' 695.9 ST -4 15.5' 894.7 ST -5 15.5' 894.7 5T -6 NOT PERFORMED NOT PERFORMED 5T -7 75.5' 897.0 ST -8 75.5' NONE OBSERVED ST -9 15.5' NONE OBSERVED ST -10 NOT PERFORMED 1407 PERFORMED Sat TYPE DESCR/PTTON SOIL BORING 5010 TYPE ST -1 POORLY GRADED SAND ST -2 POORLY GRADED SAND ST -3 POORLY GRADED SAND ST -4 POORLY GRADED SAND ST -5 POORLY GRADED SAND ST -6 164 57 -7 POORLY GRADED SAND ST -8 POORLY GRADED SAND 57 -9 POORLY GRADED SAND 5T- 10 NA 0 00 200 SCALE IN FEET 7 INCH - 100 FEET (22' X 34" SHEET) 1 INCH - 200 FEET (11" X 17" SHEET) RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 CITY OF UNO LAKES NUMBERED NOTES pt INSTALL SILTFENCE PRIOR 70 START OF SO7 DISTURBING ACTMTIES. INSTALL TEMPORARY STONE EXIT PAD PRIOR TO START OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. ®INSTALL SILTFENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF POND AT THE FOLLOWING ELEVATIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETING PON0 GRADING: POND 1 902.0 POND 2 897.0 POND 3 894.5 O INSTALL CULVERT INLET PROTECTION IMMEDIATELY AFTER CULVERT INSTALLATION. • INSTALL STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION IMMEDIATELY AFTER STRUCTURE INSTALLATION (WIMCO OR APPROVED EOLAL) ® INSTALL RIP RAP AT ALL CULVERT OUTLETS ACCORDING TO PROVIDED TABLE. 0. BOX AND RAIN GAUGE ON SITE. • CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT PAD. GENERAL NOTES 1. SEE SHEET F2 FOR ADDITIONAL SWPPP REOUIREMENTS. 2. PERFORM SEEDING FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF DISTURBED AREAS AS FOLLOWS: 0. REPLACE TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM THICKNESS. LOOSEN TOPSOIL TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 ". b. APPLY COMMERCIAL GRADE, SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER OF ANALYSIS 22 -0 -10 AT RATE OF 2 POUNDS ACTUAL NITROGEN PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. c. INCORPORATE FERTILIZER INTO SOIL BY USE OF HARROW OR OTHER MEANS TO PLACE FERTILIZER BELOW GROUND LEVEL. d. APPLY MNDOT SEED MIXTURE 90B AT RATE OF 50 POUNDS PER ACRE WITH BRILLION TYPE SEEDER OR OTHER MEANS TO COVER SEED WITH 14" TO ' - OF SOIL. e. APPLY UNIFORM COVERING OF MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. f. ANCHOR MULCH TO DEPTH OF 2 TO 3" WITH DISC ANCHOR OR OTHER MEANS IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING. *MC M 56 REINFORCEMENT PO51METAL OR rm OR SiANE DIRECTION OF RUNOFF F509 NOAL SCE. -ENGINEERING FABRIC FABRIC ANCNORAGE 1RENE NATURAL IRTN 6 INCH lI1IJ. TAMPED 9080/ NATURAL 50$ 6WCH MW NOTE. DEPENDING UPON CONFIGUR RON, ATTACH FABRIC TO MMR0 ME5H 77M HOC 77x054 s1EEL P0575 RITH TIE SIRES OR NOW POSTE BON STAPLES TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE NOT TO 5657.E `, LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ft Pnty 9 F 0 Stormwa ter Pollution Prevention Plan The work described to implement the following Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pion (SWPPP) shall be considered part of the Contract Documents and shall be performed by the Contractor. The work to install and mointoin the Best Management Practices (BMP's) to prevent erosion and provide sediment control shall be in accordance with Permit No. MN R100001 and shall include, but are not necessarily be limited to, the requirements contained herein. 1. Construction Activity Information Project Name: COMFORTS OF HOME Project Address /Location: City/Township: Cary Of LINO LAKES State: MN Zip Code: 55014 County Parcel ID Number(s): 3- 119 -21 -22 -0011 3- 119 -21 -22 -0020 3- 119 -27 -22 -0008 3- 119 -27 -22 -0007 3- 119 -21 -22 -0001 3- 119 -21 -22 -0017 All cities where construction will occur: CIfy of Lino Lakes 48 townships where construction will occur: Not Applicable All counties where construction will occur: Anoka Project Size (number of acres to be disturbed): 16.85 Project Type: XX Residential dX Commercial /Industrial _ Rood Construction _Other ( descnbe) Cumulative Impervious Surface: Existing oreo of impervious surface to nearest quarter acre: 0 Post construction oreo of impervious surface to nearest quarter acre: 10.5 Receiving Waters: Nome of Water Bodv XX Dates of Construction Estimated Construction Start Dote: AUGUST 1, 2006 Dote: AUGUST 1, 2007 Contact Information tcQf WETLAND Appendix A Special Wafer? No Estimated Completion owner of Project Site: CORE DEVELOPMENT Business /Firm Nome. CORE DEVELOPMENT Federal Tax ID Number: ovonbble os needed State Tax ID Number: available as needed Contact Person: Mork Bigelboch Title: President Phone: (651) 481 -9027 Moiling Address: 1793 Buerkle Circle City White Bear Lake State: Code: 55110 E -mail Address: none MW Zip Contractor (Party who will oversee implementation of the SWPPP. May be some party as Owner above): Business/Firm Name: CORE DEVELOPMENT Federal Tax ID Number: available as needed State Tax ID Number: available as needed Contact Person: Mark Bigelboch Title: some Phone: same Moiling Address: Some City some State. Zip Code: some E -moil Address: none Alternate Contact Person: TED Phone- IRD E -moil: none Description of the type and locutions of BMP's appropriate for this site and sufficient to comply with oil applicable requirements of the TMDL implementation plan and identification of the receiving water and of the areas of project site discharging to on impoired water that hos on approved TMDL implementation plan that contains requirements for construction Slormwoter discharges: Not opp9coble to this project. Selection of Permanent Stormwater Management System Will the project create a new cumulative impervious surface greater than or equal 10 one acre? XX nee — No 1f yes. o water quality volume of )i inch of runoff from this area must be treated before leoving the site or entering surface waters (1 inch of runoff from this area if discharging to special waters). Method(s) to be used to treat runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project: glir Wet sedinentalion basin dZ lnfilrolion/Filtration basin Regional ponds — Combination of practices Description of treatment method(s) to be used, including design information for each method THREE wet sedimentation basins will be constructed as shown on the plan. The basis hove been designed to provide o water quokty volume of 0.5 inch of runoff from the /NM impervious surfaces that drain to eoch respective basin. Each basin has also been designed to provide o permanent volume of 1.800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet invert pipe elevation for each acre that drains to the respective basin. The permanent depth of each basin will be between 3 and 10 feet. Each basin's outlet is designed to discharge the water quality volume at no more than 5.66 cubic feet per second per acre of basin surface area. Access is provided to each basin for future basin maintenance. The outlet for each basin has been located to minimize the potential for short- circuiting and includes o floral end section and riprop for energy dissipation. Each basin has been designed with o stabilized emergency overflow to accommodate storm events in excess of the basin's hydraulic design. Description of why it is not feasible to meet the treatment requirement for water quality volume. This can include proximity to bedrock or rood projects where the lock of right -of -way precludes the installation of any permanent stormwater management practices. Description of what other treatment, such as grossed 'wales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers. will be implemented to treat runoff prior to discharge to surface waters: Not Appicable Description of how a proposed alternative method to treat runoff from new impervious surfaces will achieve approximately 80R removal of total suspended solids on on onnuol overage basis: Not Appkcob7 3. Erosion Prevention Practices Description of construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices to be used to minimize erosion: Stage the sal disturbing activities to minimize the amount of disturbed soil prior to stabilization. Disturbed areas will be considered stabilized when covered MN with materials such as onchored mulch, stoked sod, riprop, wood fiber blanket, or other materials that prevent erosion from occurring. Grass seeding alone will not be considered stabilization. General Construction Project Information Description of the construction activity (what will be built, generol timeline, etc.): Comforts of Flame is a FWE lot commercial and residential subdivision on o 17.18 acre property. Lot 1 and Lot 2 ore residential Lot 1 being o condominium complex ono' Lot 2 consisting of to.nhornes. Lots 3, 4, and 5 ore commercial sites. Th. construction activities oil include grading operations for the construction of surface droinoge, sedimentation ponds, and on urban section street. Storm sewer construction, exposed soil stabilization. and bituminous paving .i/ follow grading operations. Description of soil types found at the project: According to sal borings token by o geolechnica/ engineering consultant. the majority of the 301l ore poorly graded. Z. General Site Information Description of the location and type of off temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's to be used, including the timing for installation and procedures used to establish odditionol temporary BMP's as necessary: Contractor shall install and mointoin the temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's as shown an the accompanying drawing and as described herein. The timing shall be in occordonce with the Construction Activity Sequence below and in accordance with sound and proactive construction scheduling and practices. Accompanying this SWPPP is o site plan that includes the following features: • Existing and proposed grades, including dividing lines and direction of flow for all pre- and post - construction stormwater runoff droinoge oreos located within the project limits. • Locations of impervious surfaces and sal types. • Locations of oreos not to be disturbed. • Location of areas of phased construction. • All surface waters and existing wetlonds within one -hall mile from the project boundaries that will receive slormwoter runoff from the site (identifiable on mops such as USCPS 7.5- minute quodrongle maps or equivalent). Where surface waters receiving runoff associated with construction activity will not fit on the plan sheet, they must be identified with on arrow. indicating both direction and distance to the surface water. • Method(s) to be used for linol slobilization of all exposed soil areas. Description of stormwater mitigation measures required as the result of on environmental, archaeological, or other required local, state, or federal review of the project: Not applicable to this project. Disturb only those areas where proposed contours and elevations ore shown to differ from the existing and where removals and other operations ore noted. Special oreos of the project site that ore not to be disturbed by construction activity are noted on the plan. Install wood fiber blanket where shown on the plan to provide temporary erosion protection. Description of temporary erosion protection or permanent cover to be used for exposed positive slopes within 200 lineal feet of o surface water (stream, lake, pond, marsh, wetland, reservoir, spring. river, storm water basin, storm water drainage system, waterways, water courses, and irrigation system whether surface water is natural or artificial, public or private with maximum time on exposed soil area con remain exposed when the oreo is not actively being worked: Provide year round stabilization to the above mentioned areas in accordance with the following table: Steepness of slope (H:V) Greater than 3:1 3:1 through 10.1 Less than 10:1 Maximum Exposure Duration When Area Is Not Actively Worked 7 Days 14 Doys 21 Doys Description of practices to be used to stabilize the normal wetted perimeter of drainage or diversion ditches within 200 lineal feet of the property edge or point of discharge to surface water within 24 hours of connecting the ditch to the surface water. Install seed, fertilizer, and disc- anchored mulch or temporary wood fiber blanket in ditches and soles within 24 hours of connecting the ditch or seek to the surface .afar .tare shown on the plan in accordance with the details. Description of other erosion prevention practices to be used: Install the specified energy dissipation method, such as riprop and geotexlile fabric, of pipe outlets within 24 hours of installation Permanently seed disturbed areas prior to end of seeding dotes specified by MnDOT. 4. Sediment Control Practices Description of sediment control practices to be used to minimize sediments from entering surface waters, including curb and gutter systems and storm drain inlets: Permanent sediment control practices to be used on this project consist of sedimentation basins. Temporary sediment control practices to be used are sit fence, culvert inlet protection, storm sewer inlet protection, stone pod exits. ditch checks. and. if necessary. street s.ewping. 5. Dewatering and Basin Draining If the project includes dewotering or basin draining, describe the BMP's to be used to prevent the discharge from adversely affecting the receiving waters and downstream londowners. Not opp6coble to this project. 6. Additional BMP's for Special Waters and Discharges to Wetlands This project does not discharge stormwater directly to o Special Water. This directly project does not discharge stormwater d ec y to wetlands. 7. Construction Activity Sequence In addition to performing and sequencing the tasks ossociofed with implementing this SWPPP as described herein and shown on the plan, the Contractor shall perform construction activities in accordance with the following sequence: (1) Install sill fence along properly line of project site where shown on plan and where property line is down gradient and within 100 feet of areas to have disturbed soil and where property line is within 20 feet of soil disturbing and other construction activities. (2) lnstoll sill fence along edge of wetlands and at other locations shown on the plop. (3) Install stone exit pads where shown on plan and of other locations where vehicles and equipment will leave the site onto paved and grovel surfaces. (4) Construct storm water ponds and related piping and control structures as shown on the project plans. Install and mointoin temporary erosion prevention measures as shown on the plan. (5) Install silt fence along bottom of storm water pond inslopes and where shown on the plan. (6) Complete earthwork activities. Install and mointoin sediment control measures such as ditch checks and stormwater inlet protection. (7) Complete utility construction. Install and mointoin sediment control measures such as inlet protection as work proceeds. (8) Remove silt deposits from site, remove silt deposits from stormwater basins. (9) Provide soil stabilization to disturbed oreos by preparing topsoil. seeding. fertilizing, mulching, anchoring mulch in accordance with plans and specifications. (10)Remove perimeter silt fence, other silt fence, check dams, and other sediment control measures upon achieving final stabilization and Owner submits the Notice of Termination. 8. Inspections and Maintenance Description of procedures to be token to routinely inspect the construction site: Contractor shall inspect erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's to ensure integrity and effectiveness. Repair, replace. or supplement non - functional BMP's to provide continually functional BMP's. Contractor shall inspect the entire construction site o minimum of once every seven (7) cloys during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. Inspections shall include stabilized oreos. erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's, and infiltration areas. Specific tasks associated with the inspection and maintenance of the BMP's include the following: • Maintain and retain at the construction site written records of the inspections and maintenance performed. Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include: Date and time of inspection/maintenance activity; Nome of person(s) performing the activity, Finding of inspection; Recommended corrective actions; Corrective actions token; and Date and amount of roinfoll events greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. • Repair, replace, or supplement silt fences that become non - functional or accumulate sediment to the level of 1/3 the silt fence height or more within 24 hours of discovery or as soon as conditions allow access. • Drain temporary and permanent sediment basins and remove sediment when the volume of sediment collected reaches 1/2 the permanent storage volume within 72 hours of discovery or as soon as conditions allow access. • Inspect surface waters, drainage ditches. and stormwater conveyance systems for evidence of sediment deposited by erosion. Remove deltas and deposited sediment and restabilize oreos where sediment removal results in exposed soil within seven (7) days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory. or physical constraints. Removal and stabilization shall be completed within seven (7) days of obtaining access The NPDES/SDS permit holder is responsible for contacting the local, regional. state, and federal authorities and receiving the applicable permits prior to performing this work. • Inspect construction site vehicle exit locotions for evidence of sediment being track off -site onto paved surfaces. Remove tracked sediment from of -site paved surfaces within 24 hours of discovery. • Inspect perimeter or construction site. Remove off -site accumulations of sediment in o manner and at a frequency to minimize off -site impacts. 9. Pollution Prevention Management Measures Contractor shall implement the following pollution prevention management measures on the site: • Solid Waste: Collect and properly dispose of sediment. asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic. fabrics, construction and demolition debris. and other wastes in accordance with MPCA disposal requirements. • Hazardous Materials: Properly store, provide required secondary containment, and dispose of al products, fuels, point products, and other hazardous substances to prevent spills, leaks. and other discharges in accordance with MPCA regulotions. Provide restricted access storage areas to prevent unauthorized access and vandalism. • Equipment Washing: Restrict external washing of trucks and other construction equipment to a defined oreo of site. Contoin runoff and properly dispose of waste. Engine degreasing is prohibited on the property. • Spill Prevention: Pork construction equipment and store potentially hazardous materials in a designated area located as for as practicable from potential environmentally sensitive oreos. Construct impoundment dike and take other measures required to contoin spilled material. Remove and dispose of contaminated soil. vegetation, and other materials and perform other mitigation measures as required in accordance with MPCA regulotions. • Sanitary and Septic Waste: Provide and maintain temporary facilities in accordance with MPCA and Minnesota Deportment of Health regulations. 10. Final Stabilisation Contractor shall achieve lino/ stabilization of the construction site by achieving the following: • Soil disturbing activities hove been completed and soils ore stabilized by o uniform perennial vegetative cover with o density of 70 percent over the entire pervious surface oreo or other equivolent means to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. • Temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's are removed. • Sediment is removed from permanent sedimentation basins to return bosins to the design capacity. removed from stormwater conveyance systems, and is stabilized or removed from the site. 11. Notice of Termination Contractor shall notify Owner immediately upon achieving Final Stabilization. Owner must submit the Notice of Termination within 30 days after Final Stobilizotion or within 30 days of another owner assuming control according to Port 17.8.5. over all areas of the site that hove not undergone Final Stabilization. 0 z 0 ut 03 a o: RECORD DRAWING a t i a X F2 Count Tag Sp DOH 07 Coed Multiple stems Trees of note that are potentially -specimen Trees' 1081 son 40 7 We count multiple- stemmed trees sprouting from a common base as a 1269 ae 30 6 single tree, with diameter measured as the dbh of the largest plus 112 the 1617 to 1650 ro 27 5 dbh of each additional stem. I � \ 1661 to 25 6 1 1023 dbl / \ 1663 60 28 6 2 1085 dbl \ 1691 to 27 3 1194 dbl 1 \ / 1697 ro 26 7 1702 to 30 4 1200 dbl / \\ \ / 1703 loo 24 5 1251 dbl 1943 se 35 6 1252 dal \ 1 / / \ \� Not Found 7 1262 dal 1 962 not found 8 1263 dbl \, \ % \ \ 2 1254 net found 9 1263 dbl ,i7 3 3480 not found 4 4032 not round 11 1275 dbl Too small 12 1276 did I \ \\ •A healthy tree measuring a mum of su (6) inches in tliamner for 1277 dbl \ \\ ', t \ deciduous trees, or a mmimrrl or 50'ehe (12) Met in height it oonlleno110 V \ 1296 dbl trees . 1300 dbl \ \ \ t 11051 astg 11116435 1305 dbl \ \ \ 3 1186 se 17 1312 dbl 4 11232 se 18 1325 dbl 5 u4A se 1332 dbl 6 1281 se 7 1440 se 1333 dbl 8 1493 x 229191 1339 dbl 9 1712 bar 22 1340 dbl 10 1921 ro 23 1342 dbl 11 1821 re 12 3831 se 24 1345 obi 13 3053 (S 25 1355 dal 14 3865 26 1361 quad 15 3871 qa 27 1450 quad 16 3881 qa 17 3901 qa 28 1457 quad 18 3902 qa 29 1470 quad 19 3905 qa 30 1472 quad 20 3926 0 21 3954 qa 31 1483 quad a 3957 qa 32 1484 quad 33 1506 trip Poor condition 34 1525 trip 35 1533 tip 36 1597 trip 37 1967 tip 38 3864 tip 39 3932 trip 40 4123 tip Conditions on all trees were briefly evaluated, but only recorded for Lees In poor cardleon (3 or less on a 1 to 10 scale = int'hea8519' ). Conifers looted under powedlnts that tad been severely topped and were likely to be again someday were also oied. 1 1058 rp 20 2 2 1111 2 3 1120 2 4 1256 se 22 2 5 1267 se 10 2 6 1272 jp 2 7 1362 ae 0 0 1902 sc 2 9 1405 jp 2 10 1413 jp 2 11 1416 sc 2 12 1417 rp 2 13 1419 SC 2 14 1458 rrs 15 2 15 1460 sc 2 16 1462 sc 2 17 1486 sc 8 2 18 1500 ® 2 19 1511 qa 2 20 1534 ae 1 21 1536 ae 1 22 1545 ae 0 23 1558 jp 0 24 1563 rp 2 25 1568 u 2 26 L578 jp 2 27 1581 jp 2 28 1606 Jp 2 29 1607 jp 2 30 1608 jp 2 31 1611 jp 2 32 1612 jp 2 33 1630 ae 0 34 1662 to 29 3 35 1676 sc 2 36 1687 bar 39 3 37 1688 ro 74 2 38 1694 mono 16 3 39 1699 app 16 2 40 1701 crab 8 2 41 1727 sc 2 42 1729 sc 2 43 1748 rp 2 44 1824 ro 3 45 1826 qa 3 46 1828 qa 3 47 1840 be 3 48 1845 qa 1 2 49 1847 qa 3 50 1848 ,8 1 2 51 1849 be 2 52 1851 0 3 53 1873 qa 1 54 1880 sc 1 55 1914 bar 12 2 56 1997 JO 0 57 3448 jp 0 58 3763 Jp 0 59 3807 rp 10 3 w 3820 jp 3 61 3837 qa 0 02 3878 Is 3 63 3935 qa 8 3 54 3958 qa 2 55 4042 jp 0 66 9116 qa 2 57 9119 qa 2 50 4153 Jp 2 59 4155 Jp 2 70 4156 Jo 2 Tag numbers not on list provided to us • Trees we found and added 1� • 1363 1599 • 1645 1962• 1985 3462 • 3498 3800 3844 3972 3975 4043 • 4D50 • 4059 • 4169 Duplicate tag numbers 1673 3452 3634 4053 4185 Approximate species count (some cull trees included) jp jack pine 376 qa quaking aspen 239 sc scotch pine 217 se siberian elm 199 rp red pine 120 ro red (pin) oak 71 rc eastern red cedar 56 box boxelder 53 ae american elm 45 bs blue spruce 29 ws white spruce 15 be black cherry 16 box bur oak 14 ashg green ash 6 sari sileer maple 4 crab crabapple 3 firb balsam fir 3 loc locust 3 wp white pine 2 cot cottonwood 1 mono rlorway maple 1 sugm sugar maple 1 1474 \ J -- - --7�� I ❑ 4 0 I i. . F .1000 yy AO1NSIC MAIZE 1) r>.419i 'to rx. raa IMO 517 rral .1;1+_'0T 2 100 SCALE OJ FEET 1 INCH - 100 FEET (22" X 34" SHEET) 1 INCH - 200 FEET (11 x 77- SHEET) LOT 1 "" LOT 3„ 'OCK 1 \ • 1177 \ \ \ EXISTING TREE CALCULATIONS TOTAL EXISTING TREES = 1.521 TOTAL EXISTING TREES REMOVED - 1.187 TOTAL EXISTING TREES SAVED - 340 4006 DENOTES EXISTING TREES 4006 - DENOTES EXISTING TREES SAVED I \ \ \ RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 crrY OF LINO LAKES ar 1 ro MOM ra1f.MY RIGHTO IVAT PLAT Pit l CBAHN¢ar , -- 11 CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION PASSE ENQINERINQ, INC. QVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS MINNEAPOLIS . HUDSON • CAMBRID6E (763)780-4100 (715)381 -1150 (763)689 -4042 www.passe-eng.com oKREar 00I PLAN. SeraFrt.R4v, v RrPOW WS Dar AC p. UNDER Ur i 055I .LN[!� MCC MC GA DATE REVISIONS BY 7[52/06 i RhS 07? COMMENTS - 6/23/06 I.02L06 Rd$ RESUBMIT P.U.D. RFCORD DRAWING COMFORTS OF HOME TREE INVENTORY PUN P. Sr Ai, i1on, 6:4 Oy 1555 N.R. mrrsc. 01 ice_\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LANDSCAPE LEGEND DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES Oc O O 0 CONIFEROUS TREES DECIDUOUS SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS j MELCHERT WALKKY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING 749 HIGHWAY 12 HUDSON. WI 54016 96ONE (715) 996 -7736 FAX (715) 966 -7669 EMBINIEME REVISIONS: 07 -11 -2006 SCHEMATIC DESIGN COMFORTS OF HOME LINO LAKES, MN LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN I hereby certify that this man. specification. dreport was prepared by m under my irect supervision. and that 1 o m a duty registered Landscape MMitect under the lows of the Stole of Minnesota Rep Number Name Date Date Project Number Drawn By RGH Checked By RIM KEY PLAN �,� Ll 9 LANDSCAPE LEGEND DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES Oc O O 0 CONIFEROUS TREES DECIDUOUS SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS j MELCHERT WALKKY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING 749 HIGHWAY 12 HUDSON. WI 54016 96ONE (715) 996 -7736 FAX (715) 966 -7669 EMBINIEME REVISIONS: 07 -11 -2006 SCHEMATIC DESIGN COMFORTS OF HOME LINO LAKES, MN LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN I hereby certify that this man. specification. dreport was prepared by m under my irect supervision. and that 1 o m a duty registered Landscape MMitect under the lows of the Stole of Minnesota Rep Number Name Date Date Project Number Drawn By RGH Checked By RIM KEY PLAN �,� Ll RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 OfTY OF LINO LAKES SITE INFORMATION RWPOSLOT SENIOR LIVIN13, 431 ACRES 1715412 af . _ 1:01-1S:.! LOT 2 PROPOSED 122772 TOWN772i1 3113224E1 7!!!' LOT 3 PROPOSED RETAL 75 *2421 mmsoy. LOT 4 PROPOSED RETAIL/07924 1 014 AC426 1 37,412 if. L!L s • PROPOMDIMTAAJOIT1_13.74 ACIES ss,ere. • TOTAL. . I7.J *2145 74L326 Af. 7427! ALL NuMBERS AR! APP704447 PARKING : Cub RequPed Pre453441 LET 1 PROPOSED SENE7R ASSISTED. LIV1N6 1 per 2, lbw 7.514. 11 asap ; Pr. ter :1453PrOSiEsTE:SERCOir t4,- 214. .214PP P4 ssis T14 fi=sylo. tiiostams I 45 . 2 PWCP4..- 4,456 Tornhos• Susi 5.4,1444 parking: 20 sok :13TV PITOPOSEEFIE iAL 356* Art rit.-sTsr ski': PROPOSED WEAL • .13,2110 1! p4r -200 - 103 : 56 slob , 66 444114 ,spy 12 PROPOSED Reranstrricf spoo _5 ;op • ES 3•3114 25 4104 1T 2_1 P—LOPOWO WIL IA/OPPRX!" 2/WO_PP ,_PF WO 02.. 22 L a TO70744 PROVIDER 447 la fai .• TOTA mma& . 51624514.. 2,\ .4,41 • C \ \ ' ^ - • - , %.' ..• 5. ..., . s . , . ..- " , N . • , \ . . .-'. ...' \-.. \ .5g'tr, .'''',''' -• .. s ^. v. ' '' ‘.- .1. ,N -- • ..-..;,Li ,, \ ,. --,A-- •- .,.. ,...---- \ 4, `.. . .- '4. -" . ' ,:' \ Vi',..-v- N g'.1 -- ,, • • 4: 47 C7 .11,4447C 1 1' th • I4 omforts OF •1116M.... , 140,0! -,/ 2ttD723W 991.5 4g R LINO LAKES SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OVERALL RETAIL DEVELOPMENT AND COMFORTS OF HOME FROM CONCEPT TO COMPLETION _„_ SCALE: 11' = 60'-0" NORTH\\\ •R•I•S•B•I•E ARCHITECTS, INC 215 N. Second SL, Suite 204 I River Falls, WI 54022 14,1111■121/11•• IOW IM RAN SMOAK 0.11.0•1,1101.EAVED MT MO. 1001,1•ff ansmstad no sox 1 IN MY ael • 1 COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO LAKES MINNESaTA PROECT NO 05053 Al 12 DECEMBER 2C06 RAL 13 RM. 't Elm 4' 1" Rim ± 1 1 COMMONS AREA Elm ± MEMORY ARE WING 10 UNITS DINING AcrwiTYr , AREA CHARTING/ OFFICE ELEV. EQUIP. • MAIN FLOOR PLAN - (PHASE I ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY) SCALE 1/8.•T-CY TOTAL FLOOR AREA - 14,125 S.F. covGReb DRDP-OFF 10 01 1001 PLAN NORTH ( KEY PLAN SCALE: F•100. ,■••■••• f•lorr Mrt IN11401.07COR 1114 OM= MI WOWED 011BUIR .•17, MOMS unin ma LIM Ce 4.1 L/) • • r=4 1 COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO IMPS MINNESOTA PRO,ECT NO. 05-053 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A2 12 DECREER 2016 ... gi. ii CR ilri 66113 cPcP cill 66 _Nik„ • A 14 =••= E E • cg :s.il,_,...: .._ 7 illuiiiir . KEY PLAN SCALE: F•100. ,■••■••• f•lorr Mrt IN11401.07COR 1114 OM= MI WOWED 011BUIR .•17, MOMS unin ma LIM Ce 4.1 L/) • • r=4 1 COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO IMPS MINNESOTA PRO,ECT NO. 05-053 MAIN FLOOR PLAN A2 12 DECREER 2016 • • RE DE 1 3 2006 F LINO LAKES CITY r OUTDOOR SPACE EJ SITTING MECH. II LIVING DIMINO COMMONS AREA ACTIVI AREA VINING LIVING 0 MECH. HALL HALL „ [C] L [TJ 1-[3] rle•ra PRIVATE DINING • KITCHEN IM1L° fl SECOND FLOOR PLAN - IPHASE I ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY) SCALE: US. • V-0. [LEV • 104' Y PRECAST CONC. CAP 4I 5 MS 14 END PIERS W/ 2 nes 12. D.C. CULTURED STONE VENEER, TT. 0 TIF CAW, TIP. 15-0UARTER SLOCIO S. PRECAST CONC. SILI, •YP. PRECAST CONC. CAP CULTURED STONE VENEER, 00700 1420-4.0-1211 2 1/2. CAST CONC. SIGN PANEL, BACK-10-12ACSI ELEV. l0'-4 ITO. CONCRETel ELEV.. 100-0. 'GRADE) ELEV.. tor-r rr CONCRETe) SIM LJ r MECH. ff-11-31, r L_ PLAN NORTH TOTAL •LOOR AREA • 13,41:18 S.P. CULTURED STONE VENEER CULTURED STONE VENEER, TTP. 10O-0. IEMADEI el 05 EARS 4002. EACH FACE, TYP. LAP REINF. bA15 PER STRUCTURAL NOTES ISUI, TIP SILO. .0 POOTDIGI 241 a W.4 POURED CONC. PleR W/ 170/ 45% VERT. TOTAL, N 196 • EA. END PIER 1 121 •Na • THE MIDPOINT/ MONUMENT SIGN SCALE:I/V.1,V CONC. rrs. W/ 0 04. CLINT, TTP. V.. 1.0. POOTINO -J KeY PLAN SCALE: e• 100' P IE.7 .1118•11•M INV I Ayt IHMINEND 1•0441Crlain ■■••• ■■■• 17 MASON.. e at • • ael LI) • 0.N r:4 • 1 • COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO LASES MINNESOTA PROJECT 40 05-003 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A3 12 DECEMBER 2006 —....14 AI Il■ ilh/ANr- VP NI VP irk 4 . ........„,„ 0 .1...... ,._. :I. immtilli KeY PLAN SCALE: e• 100' P IE.7 .1118•11•M INV I Ayt IHMINEND 1•0441Crlain ■■••• ■■■• 17 MASON.. e at • • ael LI) • 0.N r:4 • 1 • COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO LASES MINNESOTA PROJECT 40 05-003 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A3 12 DECEMBER 2006 RECEIVED 0 DEC 1 3 2006 crry OF UNO LAKES • • HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TYP. CLAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN 'INTEGRITY' SERIES TTP. GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40 ASPHALT SHINGLES, TTP. PRE - FINISHED M1L. GUTTER, TTP. 24° R 36° PRE - FINISHED DECORATIVE LOUVER, TTP. 24• It 28° PRE-FINISHED DECORATIVE LOUVER, TTP. HARDITRIM PANEL, (RADIUS • 840'7 HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TTP. CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TTP HARDISHINGLE - 'STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL I6' EXPOSURE( TTP. 24• K 36• FRESH -AIR INTAKE LOUVER BT MECHANICAL (PAINT TO TRIM COLOR, 'ITN 4-4 t.— r, • rte" ,�- -_ HARDISHINGLE - •STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL" 16" EXPOSURE( TTP. • ., PERFORATED MARDISOPF[P, TYP. 44ARDITRIM COLUMN BUILDOUT, TYP. I I I I I I I — J— LL - - -1L L1--- 1 —I= -- ARCH. PRECAST CONC. 55.1, TYP. SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/1P.P -0' STAMPED CONC. CAP • BENCH CULTURED STONE VENEER WD. ENTRY DOORS, TYP. 13 1/4' K 18• CAST CONCRETE ADDRESS SIGN WITH T HIGH ENGRAVED NUMERALS CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TTP. _� -� l'� z� � �r�. ^ � �• ' ;��x "'r -ter_ Y- tr iYT _ L (71. Yw` T DECORATIVE WALL BRACKET, TYP. 2e. 36' PRE - FINISHED DECORATIVE LOUVER TTP. BRICK VENEER PRE -FIN. METAL FENCE 8 GATE 3 0 ■ 5' Dd CAST CONCRETE BUDDING SIGN HARDISHINGLE - STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL' 16° EXPOSURE( TTP. HARDIPANEL 'SIERRA 8• VERTICAL SIDING, TYP. GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40 ASPHALT SHINGLES, TTP. • ,. ELIi t :,„ .. .. . j■ �4R,Ir�■ einr�l .. eamssgicswasias ■■ NW IOW eF�si-1 ,R • 0 0 0 I ill!!!!il 19 #;1:!!!!lilllluf lllll .o.!l401 !!!!!!!!!!!1* i iri III 1 ii 1 �I�� o.IIIII • 111111 • IJ II Illlil�III,II VIII . ll 11.111111 lllll G .N.,,. 1: i3 %ii E' : HARDIPANEL 'SIERRA 8° VERTICAL SIDING, TTP. ARCH. PRECAST CONC. SILL, TTP. NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION I I I 11 +- �+ I 4-4 PRE -PIN. METAL FENCE 8 GATE CULTURED STONE VENEER, TTP. SCALE: 1/8' • 1 "O I -- 6F�fa ■ senf5l j■ HARDITRIN, TTP. �1I —"r— .,,Ir, � yI Iyl J J CULTURED STONE SILL ! EA COLUMN, TTP. women oensamee..E•extean MRCS MG.. ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 �■ COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO LAKES MINNASOIA PROJECT NO 05-053 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4 T2 DECEMBER 2016 ■ i • RECEWED DEC 1 3 2006 Oi %Y Or L 1140 LAKES CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TIP. 1 ELEV. • 105-0" ITRUSS eRGJ I I c 5 HARDISHINGLE - 'STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL' 16' EXPOSURE' TYP. 12 Q5 "nig r } I6" HIGH LETTERS 24' HIGH LETTER EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION CLAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN 'INTEGRITY' SERIES TTP. SCALE: 1 /M• P-0" CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TIP, GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40' ASPHALT SHINGLES, TIP. DECORATIVE WALL BRACKET TYP. HARDTTRIM PLANK FASCIA, TYP. HARDISHINGLE - STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL' 16" EXPOSURE) TYP. CLAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN INTEGRITY' SERIES TTP. 'HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TTP. 'HARDRRIM COLUMN BUILDOUT, TYP. [LEV. • 120.6• 170155 eRGJ ELEV. . neH• 1TL. WI000wS/ F.FE • 61-6• 0GECOND FLORIN 0 [Lev .• 1074. ITO. WINDOWS) v CULTURED STONE VENEER PP& • 700.0" IMAM FLOOR) ELEV.. 'Pp DO. FTGJ HARDISHINGLE • STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL' 16' EXPOSURE) TTP. 'PORTICO. COMPOSITE RAILING SYSTEM, TYP. HARDIPANEL SIERRA Y VERTICAL 515100, TIP. 5/4x12 HARDITRIM PLANK, TYP. PRECAST CONCRETE SILL CAP PRE-FIN. METAL FENCE 6 GATE CULTURED STONE VENEER 1 5 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-4-1r -- 4.1 1 DECORATNE L-77.5 ALL BRACKET SCALE: 1 /8'•P -0" I I I I e =5 ELEV. • 120' -C rotas BM • eLev. • ne'-e• Tr.o. WINDOW51 FlE • 111-6' 0EC060 FL00R1 01.LV. • 105.2 (TD. WINDOWS/ 0 ELEV. • 100-4• ITO. SILL) d FlE • 700.0' PAIN FLOOR( ELEv.. (T.O. FTGJ 5' -4" e• C.M.U. STOOP W/ 12• • 20'FT6. WI 121 95• CONT. 121 15 • JAMS 6' CAW W/ 15'4 • 52. 0.0. BELOW GRADEI W/ •54 • 52" Ot. MOVE GRADE1 DASHED LINE 100104705 EXTENT OF ROOF OVERMANS ABOVE, TTP. L__ J TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN ELEV. • 109'-R• e (TRUSS WWI ELEV. • 107' -4' .r.0. STONE VENEER( x 7-0" HOLLOW METAL DR 8 FRAME F.F.E. • 100 -0" ELEV. • 65'-0" i1.O. FODTINGI S C A L E: I/4" • P-0" DECORATIVE WALL BRACKET, 7711. HARDISHINGLE - 'STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL" M• EXPOSURE' 7011. 12115• JAMS PLAN NORTH CULTURED STONE VENEER, TYP. t nil wimm CLAD WD. MARVIN INTEGRITY' WINDOW - IAWN2525 IFIXED1 TIP. OF 124 5TL INSULATED RA15ED PANEL EMBOSSED GARAGE DOOR 16'-0" x 7-0•1 TRASH ENCLOSURE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40' ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP. HA001701M PLANK FASCIA, TIP. S C A L E: 1 /S°. P-0' pp • !-4 ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ COMFORTS OF ME HO PROPOSED ROPOSED SENIOR LIVING UNO USES MINNESOTA PROJECT NQ 05-053 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5 12 DECEMBER 2006 ■ i RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 C[iY U LNOLADS 155' -8' OVERALL DIN. 64$ 641' 6P -6" 14 -4' PATIO - -r PATIO STORAGE STORAGE 4 L PHH\' r�fN r i I I I 1 L EL EV. EQUIP. ECM. LOBBY L STORAGE II II STORAGE rTh I I I I r1 - 1 -1 r1kr -, kJ 1 I I I I ENTRY DOl `°R`N IDD e PATIO -ter LJ PATIO NECK LOBBY J LJ L- L tf STORAGE STORAGE I I 1 1 �n k k W k 5-1* j i r��t– I Ill.( )(1 I I I I I V 1 ENTRY 1 O O PGRa [D D 1 _J GROUND FLOOR PARKING LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/8 "• P -0• L PATIO • PATIO ELEV. EOUIP. NECK LOBBY L STAIR 5 STORAGE II II STORAGE 1 0 D PDCN DO I I k k rl#- - -11 rjW ^Nj-1 I I +LJ I I I 1 1 1 J LJ L_ J Jrtl J L✓ J 7490 S.F. ROTAL FLOOR AREAI PLAN NORTH • • ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LIIR/ IAKES MINNESOTA TA ■ PROECT NO. 055-053 GROUND FLOOR PARKING LEVEL A6 12 DECEMBER 2006 i RECZTED DEC 1 3 2006 LTY OF L O LAKES 195 -4' OVERALL DIM. iT -4° 614. 61-4. 61-4 SECOND FLOOR PLAN — L — J r L — J 8050 S.F. ROTAL FLOOR AREA) SCALE: 1/e••1,0• PLAN NORTH NAM IS 100,13010. - LAMM • • • Y�1 • • ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ COMFORTS OF HOME PRopamp Sawa LJVING LINO LASES MINNESOTA ■ PRO.ECT NO 05-063 SPLAN ECOND FLOOR A7 12 DECEMBER 2036 i Fc7P1(FD DEC 1 3 2006 11-Y O LJNO LAKES 185.4• 6P-4• 61,4• Il-4• THIRD FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /8 "•P-O• BO 30 S.r.,1OTAL I•LOOR AREA, r --1 L - J PLAN NORTH • L/1 • ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO LAKES MINNESOTA ■ PROECT NO. 05-053 THIRD FLOOR PLAN A8 12 DECEMBER 2006 i • • • RSCEPeED DEC 1 3 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES ELEV. 110-0 SAVE F.F.E. 1DO -0° ilia lli HGi i■I, �i'i', _RGi' ii „■ r■il.A�■I■I�� °■i ■i !f�lllill i - III Ili ! : I � — ==.11-171 ___ 11 �I I :a 11rr_ I 1 F �, .. 1 III r 1 �� illlilll1111 � rr i �. r rrri r rr i�.. =7: A.rr=3.,.._..�: �a... x.:r�.4 — :�2 rr —x. Ate- -.2 • ..._...LSE.:.:— :-- ..6- - -.Z': SOUTH OVERALL EXTERIOR ELEVATION ELEV.• 130-2' OOF TRUSS BRG. F.FE• 721-6' THIRD FLOOR • ELEV.• 130-2• ROOF TRS BRG. THIRD FLOOR P.FE.• 112-4• 9 F.F.E.• 11V-4- SECOND FLOOR SECOND FLOOR S C A L E: 7/16° • 2.0" CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TTP. HARDISHINGLE •STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL° 16• EXPOSURE! TYP. DECORATIVE WALL BRACKET, TYP. LAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN 'INTEGRITY' SERIES TYP. ' HARDIPANNK SELECT CEDARMILL° LAP SIDING, IS° EXPOSURE!, TYP. INSULATED SECTIONAL OVERHEAD STEEL DOOR ENLARGED WEST ELEVATION S C A L E: 1/8° • 1'•0° CONCRETE SILL CAP CULTURED STONE VENEER, TIP. HARDIPANEL SIERRA 8• VERTICAL SIDING, TYP. F.F.E• 700-0- 21-1 1/6• 6 F.F.E.• 100-0' \-1— MiZtf " �r.r -ems �tlry mr m- is IWigl 1111111111111 E.C. 0011:1MIL l' EM.: WEST OVERALL EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1116'• l' -O° TTP. • DORMERS —1 :7 T 1 CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TVP. GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40 111-'-;-'14' I ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP. ice-•` ,_1„ �7I GAP TIMBERLINE SELECT 40' ASPHALT SHINGLES, — TYP. 1x4 HARDTTRI• TTP. 1•10 HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TYP. 1x3 HARDITRIM, TYP. ELEV.. 130' -2° ROOF TRUSS BRG. 1x6 HARDITRIM, TYP. 1•10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP, F.FE.• 121 -6° THIRD FLOOR 1x4 HARDITRII TYP. 7x6 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1x10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP. F.F.E.• 111-4• SECOND FLOOR PRE - FINISHED MTL GUTTER, TTP. 1x3 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1x6 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1x4 HARDITRIM, TTP. F.F•• ELEV.. 9W-W TD. FOOTING olouir -i 1 111Cii III � IIII'I1' i \ipL.,_, 1x4 HARDITRIM, TVP. 1x10 HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TTP. ELEV.. 130' -2' ROOF TRUSS BRG. 183 HARDITRIM, TVP. Ix6 HARDITRIM, TTP. CLAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN INTEGRITY' SERIES TTP. HARDISHINGLE - STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL• 16• exPOSUReI TTP. 1,10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TYP. F.Ft • 121 -8" THIRD FLOOR 1,4 HARDITRIM, TYP. miN 'I i- 4IARDIPLANK SELECT CEDARMILL• LAP SIDING, 15" EXPOSURES TYP. CLAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN 'INTEGRITY' SERIES TYP. 1x10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP. F.F.E.• 01-4° SECOND FLOOR PRE - FINISHED NTL GUTTER, TVP. 1x6 HARDITRIM, TVP. 1x4 HARDITRIM, TYP. PRE -FIN. INSULATED STEEL OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR HARDIPANEL SIERRA 8- VERTICAL SIDING, TVP. CONCRETE SILL CAP CULTURED STONE VENEER, TTP. F.FE.• 100-0' FIBERGLASS ENTRY 5Y5105. TT?. TTP. • ENTRY CANOPY ENLARGED PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4••1.O- ELEV. 96'-B• T.O. FOOTING FIRM 1•111•111.11, WYE MM. I.NOTINO /0.110. YON TS WM 0,116 • • • Vl 1-■x4 • r1 P� • • • • 1 ■ COMFORTS O7F� HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LD O LAKES MINNESOTA • PROJECT NO. 05-053 SOUTH AND WEST EXTERIOR ELAVTIONS A9 12 DECEMBER 2006 i r s 1' f 7.- 11I' i I :i: k GAP TIMBERLINE SELECT 40' ASPHALT SHINGLES, — TYP. 1x4 HARDTTRI• TTP. 1•10 HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TYP. 1x3 HARDITRIM, TYP. ELEV.. 130' -2° ROOF TRUSS BRG. 1x6 HARDITRIM, TYP. 1•10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP, F.FE.• 121 -6° THIRD FLOOR 1x4 HARDITRII TYP. 7x6 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1x10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP. F.F.E.• 111-4• SECOND FLOOR PRE - FINISHED MTL GUTTER, TTP. 1x3 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1x6 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1x4 HARDITRIM, TTP. F.F•• ELEV.. 9W-W TD. FOOTING olouir -i 1 111Cii III � IIII'I1' i \ipL.,_, 1x4 HARDITRIM, TVP. 1x10 HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TTP. ELEV.. 130' -2' ROOF TRUSS BRG. 183 HARDITRIM, TVP. Ix6 HARDITRIM, TTP. CLAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN INTEGRITY' SERIES TTP. HARDISHINGLE - STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL• 16• exPOSUReI TTP. 1,10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TYP. F.Ft • 121 -8" THIRD FLOOR 1,4 HARDITRIM, TYP. miN 'I i- 4IARDIPLANK SELECT CEDARMILL• LAP SIDING, 15" EXPOSURES TYP. CLAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN 'INTEGRITY' SERIES TYP. 1x10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP. F.F.E.• 01-4° SECOND FLOOR PRE - FINISHED NTL GUTTER, TVP. 1x6 HARDITRIM, TVP. 1x4 HARDITRIM, TYP. PRE -FIN. INSULATED STEEL OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR HARDIPANEL SIERRA 8- VERTICAL SIDING, TVP. CONCRETE SILL CAP CULTURED STONE VENEER, TTP. F.FE.• 100-0' FIBERGLASS ENTRY 5Y5105. TT?. TTP. • ENTRY CANOPY ENLARGED PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4••1.O- ELEV. 96'-B• T.O. FOOTING FIRM 1•111•111.11, WYE MM. I.NOTINO /0.110. YON TS WM 0,116 • • • Vl 1-■x4 • r1 P� • • • • 1 ■ COMFORTS O7F� HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LD O LAKES MINNESOTA • PROJECT NO. 05-053 SOUTH AND WEST EXTERIOR ELAVTIONS A9 12 DECEMBER 2006 i • RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 I y 0.45x F.FE.• 1218' THIRD FLOOR * F.FE• 114-4' SECOND FLOOR F.F.E.• 100'0^ EAST OVERALL EXTERIOR ELEVATION S CAL E 1/16" • 1' -O' DECORATIVE WALL BRACKET, TTP. ELEV • 13O'-2° ROOF TRUSS BRG. F.F.E . 121O ' 8' THIRD PTO B F.F.E. 111-4" SECOND FLOOR F.F.E.• 10D' -0" gill WI" ii 1111Nilliii1111 .. .: 1111, % i iii l LM 111 iiiii t Ilti�l I ®u ts =I. ;i ij l!!!ii'■ II' it 1 11� IIh. II I�' i i' i 111 ill �IIl4 %� f 1 11111 1 'i H ;::77.1111M1111111 1.111E6P.1 :.111111 Milk: -.-.711111=1".;-- -JUDE 101111111 1111112I ill + lI (full L 11�I 'I : II a 111111111111 1: I 1 I� (1 I1NI ! 1111! I l 111110 ? If .II li ►111111111 ill!±I�� � IIG, � 1111,111 I 1.1 DIME NORTH OVERALL EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16'• P -O' CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TTP. --i- __ � 1 T- +1' � .1 L ' 1 � --'�- - - - - -- • ��,- • = --- - -� 7 ._ u 7 1 SL1 GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40 .� .. 11_._ rr_i_ _,� _ t _.r_ ..— __ __ _ _i.._. 1 ASPHALT SHINGLES, TTP. 'rT 17-71-7-r - -L--- -i'-� -`- µm 1 -1' -r_ • --!- '1 : : ' y :_.t. I_ 17 j-L1141 -114U -j- ,y�y-r -: :TT - _�- .._._ __ :I 1111-11 I:ITi' 11 I _ jj:j 1 II -- 11 IRA HARDITRIM, TTP. 540 HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TTP. ELEV. 1B0' -2• ROOF TRUSS BRG. 113 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1x6 HARDITRIM, TTP. CLAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN INTEGRITY' SERIES TTP. HARDISHINGLE - STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL" 16° EXPOSURE' TTP. 1:70 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP. F.FE.• 121 -8• THIRD PLOOR 114 HARDITRIM, TTP. 'HAROIPLANK SELECT CEDARMILL' LAP SIDING, US" EXPOSURES TTP. - CLAD WOOD WINDOWS MARVIN 'INTEGRITY' SERIES TTP. - 540 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP. Ii FEE• 115-4" SECOND FLOOR 1.2 HARDITRIM, TYP. 116 HARDITRIM, TYP. 1x4 HARDITRIM, TTP. HARDIPANEL 'SIERRA B. VERTICAL SIDING, TTP. 1x4 HARDITRIM, TTP. F.F.E. 10V -0° FIBERGLASS DOOR, TYP. ENLARGED PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION CONCRETE SILL CAP CULTURED STONE VENEER, TTP. S CAL E : 1/4' • P-0' ELEV. 9641' T.O. FOOTING CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TTP. LJ_ 47ARDIPLANK *SELECT CEDARMILL" LAP SIDING, 15" EXPOSURE', TYP. INSULATED SECTIONAL OVERHEAD STEEL DO05 ENLARGED EAST ELEVATION SC AL E: 1/8••10" CONCRETE SILL CAP CULTURED STONE VENEER TYP. HARDIPANEL SIERRA 5" VERTICAL SIDING, TTP. HARDISHINGLE STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL" I6" EXPOSURE' TYP. DECORATIVE WALL BRACKET, TYP. GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40' ASPHALT SHINGLES, TTP. 1.4 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1210 HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TTP. 1.9 HARDITRIM, TTP. ELEV. 1315-2' ROOF TRUSS BR6. IR6 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1.10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP. F.P.E. 125-6" THIRD FLOOR 1.4 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1.6 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1.10 HARDITRIM PLANK, TTP. FF.E• 118-4" SECOND FLOOR 1.3 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1.6 HARDITRIM, TTP. 1x4 HARDITRIM, TYP. PEE.. 100'-0• ELEV• 96'9" TA. FOOTING ■ WC, ILIPMENT way WO' ■ r ■ ■ W Vl 1■1 • 1 COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO LAKES MINNESOTA PROJECT NQ 05-053 NORTH AND EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A10 72 DECEMBER 2006 • • RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 CITY OF LINO LAKES SENIOR APARTMENT BUILDING PARKING LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1C*�e oar• r• NedATpli MEM MEM U$31 RP TOTAL FLOOR ARRA PLAN NORTH CID • 11.M.LIM,IIO IBS RJR 0.10.1.21 MET KROIIM IMO NY MY MEW= /00•1137 man. yaws bee osas • 6 1 0 w z • • • 1 COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO LAKES MINNESOTA PROJECT NC. 05-053 SCHEMATIC DESIGN All 12 DECEMBER 2006 • • R 0 LaiNi EC 1 3 2006 CFI'? Or LINO LAKES TA* DRIVE ,UNDER CANOPY 10 01 , Io o� SENIOR APARTMENT BUILDING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: ]/pt•• Y]M Sr. TOTAL FLOOR AREA PLAN NORTH KAMA 8 ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO LAKES MINNESOTA PROJECT NO 05 -053 SCHEMATIC DESIGN Al2 12 DECEMBER 2006 R� DE cmr • • CFIVED C 1 3 2006 OF UNO LAKES r L SENIOR APARTMENT BUILDING SECOND LEVEL PLODS PLAN anr•ro 0175 \t. TOTAL mow /MA PLAN NORTH a[> 1 J PliMIIMO MEM= MIS CI, Mr SLIM IMOSICOL w • • • • 1--I • ■ ■ • ■ 1 ■ COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO WOWS lrA PROECT NO 05-053 SCHEMATIC DESIGN A13 12 DECETBER 2006 ■ CER°IED • D C 1 3 2006 OI I OF LINO LAKES • • ELEV. • 120' -0 • )TRUSS BR6J ELEV. • 118' -2• LTA. WINDOWS) F.F.E. • 114-0" ISECDND FLOOR) ELEV. • 107 -2' 17.0. WINDOWS) • P.FE N • 0' -0° )MAI FL00 10 RI F.F.E. • BB' -4• 6 (GARAGE LEVEL) HARDISHINGLE - 'STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL" 16• EXPOSURE) TYP. DECORATIVE WALL BRACKET, TIP. HARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TYP. CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TYP. MARDISHINGLE - 'STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL' I6' EXPOSURE) TYP. GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40' ASPHALT SHINGLES, TIP. 'COLOR. "BURNT SIENNA") PRE - FINISHED MTL GUTTER, TIP. 448211R1M PLANK FASCIA, TYP. CLAD WOOD WINDOWS BT EAGLE WINDOW CO. TYP. 1 o'er S' `��`.•i� � c4a j1 1 luiLa il ❑❑ I I Y- 6• x6' -0° CAST CONCRETE i I BUILDING SIGN 1 L_ 1 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION • EXTERIOR PAINT SELECTIONS: t SHAKES SHERWIN WILLIAMS NO 5W2083 'GRISTMILL" {SATIN) 2. SIDING: SHERWIN WILLIAMS N0. 5W6156 'RAMIE" I5AT1N) 3. TRIM: SHERWIN WILLIAMS N0. 5W6154 NACRE" (SATIN) WD. ENTRI DOORS, TYP. L \_14ARDITRIA! COLUMN BUI DOUT, TYP. ARCH PRECAST CONC. SILL, TYP. CULTURED STONE VENEER PRE - FINISHED MTL GUTTER 204 6'-0• LOUVER, MY IECHANICALI PERFORATED WARDISOPFIT, TYP. 1x2 HARDRRIM, TIP. 1x4 HARDITRIM, TYP. 'HARDIPLANK SELECT CEDARMILL" LAP SIDING, (5" EXPOSURE(, TYP. 148 HARDITRIM, TYP. 614 440011RIM, TYP. Ix4 HARDITRIM, TYP. 1x6 HARDITRIM, TYP. HARDIPANEL 'SIERRA B' VERTICAL SIDING, TYP. 1412 HARDITRIM PLANK, TYP. ELEV. • 120' -0" • (TRUss 5061 ELEV. • 11B'-? /- ▪ IT.O. WINDOWS) ▪ F.FE. • 111-0 'SECOND FLOOR) ELt5. • 107 -2" • (TA. WINDOWS) F.FE. • 100-0• • )MAIN FLOOR) F.FE. • 89,4" B (GARAGE LEVEL) ELEV. • 120'-0• • )TRUSS DRGJ ELEV, • 118' -2. IT.O. WINDOWS) F.E.E. • 11'-0 ISOCOND FLOOR) 0LE5. • 107.2• B LTA. WINDOWS) F.FE. • 100'-0 • )MAIN FLOOR) F.F.E. • B9' -4• )GARAGE LEVEL) SCALE 3/32" • 1' -0' GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40' ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP. [COLOR: *BURNT SIENNA") CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TTP. 24" • 30 PRE - FINISHED DECORATIVE LOUVER, TYP. PRE- FINISHED MTL GUTTER In if ME I I L 1100 11ARDTTRIM', TYP. 1502 MARDTTRIW, TYP L L PRE - FINISHED NIL. LOUVERS, (5E0 MECHANICAL) WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" •i'-0" 24' x 04" FRE6H -AIR INTAKE LOUVER I5EE MECHANICAL.) CULTURED STONE VENEER 1 -1 —U 1 EXHAUST VENTS, (SEE MECHANICAL) L Ili Ililff'tlllill;i BIIBY•UiII.i.I. •1.II MINIM) WL IMIMIM 1 1/2. 01A. PAINTED MIL GUARDRAIL • NOTE PROVIDE 5/4" 'HARDITRIII BLOCKS AT ALL MECHANICAL THRU -WALL PENETRATIONS, TIP. J CLAD WOOD WINDOWS BY EAGLE WINDOW CO. TYP. CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT, TIP. o4ARDITRIM PLANK FASCIA, TYP. 'HARDISHINGLE - 'STAGGERED EDGE NOTCHED PANEL. I6' EXPOSURE` TYP. I II II I I I II I L J NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32 "•7 -O" • ELEV. • 120' -0 ELEV. BRGJ ELEV. • 118' -2• • LTA. WINDOWS) F.FE, • mV (SECOND FLOOR) ELEV. • 107.2' (TA. WINDOWS) F.FE. • 100-0" • IMAIN FLOOR) F.E.E. • 89'• "' )GARAGE LEVEL) 'HARDIPLANK' •SELECT CEDARMILL• LAP SIDING, (5" EXPOSURE), TIP. GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40' ASPHALT SHINGLES, TIP. (COLOR BURNT SIENNA") • ........_.. _...,:... `ems —'��- i II II u 111,1IIII11'I'1 14ARDIPANEL' BD. 8 BATTEN 1 VERTICAL SIDING, TYP. L SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION RAISED PANEL EMBOSSED INSULATED STEEL GARAGE DDDR 1YP. 6' DIA STEEL PIPE BOLLARD, /SEE 4841.1) ern oturlt: MI if. SCALE: 3/32" • 1' -D" 1.1r7121111/1,1140 R.11.1.41720{ LOP • • V1 • ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ COMFORTS OFF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO TARES MINNESOTA PRO.ECT NO. 05-053 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A14 12 DECEMBER 2006 ■ i • • • R DE crr �CEPVED 1 3 2006 OF LINO LAKES MAIN FLOOR PLAN - COMMONS BUILDING SCALE: UB• T-O TOTAL FLOOR AREA • 5,237 S.r. SENIOR LIVING APARTMENTS PLAN NORTH SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING COMMON BUILDING FRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/E•l0• KEY PLAN SCALE: r • ma DOB • • ■ • • ■ ■ COMFORTS OF HOME PROPOSED SENIOR LIVING LINO LASES MINNESOTA ■ PRO,ECT NO. 05-053 COMMONS BUILDING FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATION A15 12 DECEMBER 2006 RECEIVED DEC CITY 0 1 3 2006 LINO LAKES �,. :r • 1q?. ` `3231. ' `.. .. VE;ENTIGN r Ts No G it, 0-'0,0 • r -.\r Y r(ti yK/1i'G '1 r r r r 1,;1 11tr p. 74117 w 7404:,0}•. •r •1./ •0 0171 r i, i r VVt, :�ecr^`„\lr.r`y` 3074 r r r.:IF'�M,n'r. .-r rr 4,74 rr \ • _rr r err t Si(Nr r "40 " : • I.. . • .:'G 7400 R:1 AL IBS 3224 .:.5 �tAP `Ivii'yr TT! Ts 41 ..r k oiarr_ y..r 7 o *1. • ySyr `s "`7 • V3.. • C-,.-r,ay� �. r .t 1 v w ` .iV0.003+_r • ...'30,...„. . A. `Yr 3074 J`1 , .. 130`:4.` §` ��,,��".]�11�.�. rp Nir r„ �"r�,p» + • .,'ti. •" A. '' y r • 7431 t 1- •{3_33_{3 1 J 11• 00• .,..200- . { • • .i • 7413. r r1 A: • i mi. r- +.t � �.L., I. ��..r•a�i�'' ' �y • y • r : I� r�. .. ,4 11t'.. njr•tr r .�}sr -a1`wv • r ..R..... f! • Ja' 11,... ay vim., -'`." r leo d...4.4.r 741074 ..'74'-0 r.. J 55.17 S.•-- GO 0333 16231313 17417 'r v r'li,ry rc-cc 0140 74ah -04,+0 acv r Y r .256 TostiotriA5,'^- d• +F f0+0}7474 w.rrr.J •JV Vii.. .1 r rz : us. r.. rrrL`. 1.:\7474 0. s t. r - la' � ,7‘..A.32 te .e0'.^dM1 i'A:e�' • i ..r 0...• 15^4 0 0,Cvk eerr a 1.. A. • • ., „4. h.i» w. ga "'.` `r_"�, `� { :, :�u ° 0:.74 "�`-�. J q r rtirr `101. �'.r 74.7401 YY, 4 '113030` A. r...l. 1 • r to _.L_ r -32-74 io . r'�• • �, • 0 74. l•{ ••j- 74 74- �ti..r -74 74 74 J - r •••17-lei • \ v .�.1 :ter ..• rt. ^+� rrpp r r 7474.174. rr `rrl .r J : • t et_ 1 • 6. • ~14.1+17 r r • • e-vrr.rr • 400 -111174 • 0 0-,I1-v-• • 74.7.1- • r I�S-c Qs-s .� • r .:r • ,.`. r y " r i bFi1 �. . r • cats-`','{: _ _- c-)�-c.. r x1 32 r +? ` "s�`' y� ( `y Yr 74.0. r \. 7432.0003 • • E. ) • toi 4 ti,•': rle •.a. I 3100 s 0174 �� +•••• +.1_�. as •741744 • 7474 L au n� .Ib �_ q 3�r �r�?drr r Ji ♦'74.74_74 74174 • wr � � ;� :,, �� :� � To rTro ri 44. .r_rr r.+ _7474747474 rrrrrr .iy04ToTs ,1 330.,• •`31`..��._ ..u"� .7474 4 ....... °tLl..... ... .7474 111111741174 -- „7 rrrrrr s, s-.. �. ` 0307474 r Ylr•1. 00-023. 10 r r 1. ' �I r r \r}rr • j To IS 1 • �"6-0001002.23.•550 _74 1 r ` %" •I - - r 7413. -r-r- 432.032. r r . r r • r cc • • ` ` ■ t r rrr,�r r 7430 -.h. -0 +000 .2 .0..„2 iF W r r . r e • c.-.. 300/074. S W 00.30 :,r ir320-3. +0-., . 1.`1, -=ter r ., • • • io -c'-0�1 • •v -r-.r.,. , .1.•741` r r rat... '- -cv- t- .rrr.... • 07.7:-....., r r r 1174. r 'tir...01-v evr-r-cer r r r r 0 yr ` _ S6P03'?3'W 99098 d; ;. i I 1 Vv,'= i.Ls,rJvvk C. it rrrr¢s,r..rrn, rbrr.rlrrir 7414 1L • -- - ----_. C.S :A H. NO. 49 (HODCS'ON ROAD) PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN SCALE: 1.=60'-0* STATISTICS 0440101m 0100.• 21•011:•1 Asp. SAID N/A NIA LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE 4170 L. QV 030102lA0M0 10•0000 Lary R. Lamas LLF Was A • 14340. MIN (8 AR■.�1a0ED MEMO COMM WR/WREFL. CLEAR GLANS DROP L M DECYIATCLEAR E0.'302ETAL WLLg, IAR®IftAL POSTON. Ll,01E0 2200) an .Q 0 0 103E2ACOJR2 PRZAI M 01703E IOEDDCWRN BRED REFLECTOR ONE 000MATe C FAR mt07ETAL NAME. HOMO METAL NAME.l 05020553.1E8 22000 0.72 001 8 C e 14]0162 H0 if0®DCFIR111REMTH PREMIUM SEGMENTED REFLECTOR OPE40D.WATTWEAR EOM SEUL Kum 03SSII19611FE 22000 0.72 AM NORID•nK1.0107100 0 O 1 RB'F2 SOW MIC TYPE.. 020167. CUTOFFLIRIMOE ONE 000YYA1T GEAR E0.211 METAL HALIDE IIOI�DNTAL N01r10i1. M�1JFE 30700 an 3216 rfl E 22 BIL-SM -20 - fG.AN LAME DECORATIVE LtMMAtE WIM MC1-TYPE• NM Am perlmurlmR 220 WATT MI CLEAR -a 13I21.OBfW .100 21®0 0.72 2® LIAANAIRE LOCATIONS W 13074.011_ 113 5 • • .11117011 700A IDA 701 A 010 7330 030 037 42200 7.072 RD Asuan era. YID • OA ammo 7215 m 210 IDA OA -,mm 7000 0 0 0 30A 302 DID A -0141.17 71074 017A MAD ..0711.17 7113.0 00 • -,327417 1111 Lm 001 tm m -,33701 101 m A -0317 7000 0 0 mn m m 001111 IMO 70A ODA INA OA CI 070/330 740.0 700 WA LO 470. 7441311 0 ■. ■, OA 33 106 3160 RD IS 2130 ILO DA 00011 701 611 0270.0 71026 Ins 300 17 e 4302017 000 0 31111 LO -1200.0 7061 LO .01010.0 77100 3310 0.0 -12.000 11231 ..711013.11 72031 OA ■ c •ma 71■. m 0 420 m 0321 1144.0 O 00 00 302 -17130 10A as 4020 700 10A 704 .010131 ODA KO 13 • -130001 12070 31331 3031 OA 0127100 20.2 OA a ..0013A 700 .2303.7 7171.0 OA 410011 1022 30A 30/ LO 43077 logra ■ e 4440. 7010 m m 0 m 47703 IOWA ✓ e 4:44 MO/ 0 m 0 m 4•132 440 m • 070.. 74■. ■. m AD • O 00 700 DA ■ 74.. sm .. 217 m oa 32 .»7... 44. m ., m .0111 Mal LS .srm 7050 w. n1 m m 43213 73232 4323231 lam s. 0 /0011.• 71027 RD • asELA 7020 0731 .37A •C00.7 7050 MD ■ • 44444• 701.0 Sm m 301 m .010 011.3 000 700 303 OA 00.20 7130 4001, 700 Sm m. MAO m 47003/ 1032 m • 471320 7100 AO W 112 m 23020 71705 023302 77302 01.0 .131110.7 17302 ILO -01017 700.11 71.0 00 OA 010 170 -00011 77030 010 30/ m 43203 1707 as O 0211 110 .23010 RS 4>73a 770 0 0 43232 m -07417 7700.7 m 432441 714417 ■. 720 ., m 451315 20.5 • 0711 170 0 me d m 43210 771117 m .0011 111. 0 0 au m -01323 740 m a 4000 7001 0 301 y m 43005 7001 • 474. 710 0 0 321 m 43001 7300 -a471 77S$ am 01 -101 m 42002 770.7 u 03700 72103 m 3044 1023 m .127003 MILS IW DE =- iror 020L-C10 4432_ 1x.o.. .■32.174. EPIC rODmNI yrs TYPICAL OF TYPE 'E' (ALIT A LAVETAVIT FEATURES ,a. SPECIRCATIONS 10 0.0102.37 223 • ...:7.32... • *Ma.. N....310.00 •• • 000 F..w_ 4._74 norm - 00001. sm. .___ 1* 74320 MO -11 .+74274 aria.* ria. .. 00 0000.2 74 ' N' 74._: 1go. 30 m. �7 7: ,._.._me- � R ,LW yomoismor. Oro Om YaMa 00=I■0 11r rn mire Mb .00 1030 .10000i2 3330I.s�.1>...M..+.. 1.01.._10.0 : 11232.1100 - 2041, 0.0 I. Iwo rso 000 oo3020002 00.300.01.1...100 3.474• ORDERING INFORMATION 0100 22. onsm as 230120000 00 BO 00 02 00 RIR 0374 0000..0111 1 333x. I I 10032313133 II 0020 12 74132 lord: M ._I 00074301000 020 OW IS 300177,4433.. _ . ON a 7474. i1I 07 MR 0230 13 sor 1r 1..3 r.m.a01.a -. 10 PM 2.40..: Of ..., TM fp Ohm ▪ ono ...0740..3 ro 30 0 741_.+ 00' .+.4....74 IQ.001O r ul40:1.lrYY: __. .rr072 32:0000 Y .1..2_ 01 770'..0022 .2.:30 r 32 rn O. �'r••RR10. 000 MOTO 1..10 000 11/203 Or 200 13.2._* 011.72 mow 7333... Amm. -Imo/atom o600061r .000.0Rmv+ >¢ 112 a 7 30 72332 mma 100 000 17F7.7R_7r.1730a 7730 700 0130 021.0 1001 74074 104.00 Ors M 0.30.0 1.200 OA 0_1.nl1000 044 laws AP 0 043. 3132 3746 ▪ 000 aloo 321 MB 00 331 10010.23.10104 en 011 101100.202101 0 710 7417 1 a..7402 r. mm 30 401•074 I ems 1021 0.0 LW.011a ALSO TYPICAL OF TYPE 'A' THRU '0' RFCF1VED DEC 1 3 2006 a • NEW FACdIIY7. COMFORTS 4 of HOME SaBOR Limo MD LAW 1!$DGEOI'A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN P1 12 OECE00ER 2000 • STAFF ORIGINATOR: MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM 7.D. Paul Bengtson February 14, 2007 TOPIC: Conditional Use Permit — Motor Fuel Station Preliminary Plat Holiday Stationstores - 7509 Lake Drive BACKGROUND The City of Lino Lakes in partnership with Anoka County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation are completing plans for the reconstruction of the Lake Drive and I -35W Interchange. Construction is anticipated to start in April /May of 2007. During the past year the City has been working with adjacent property owners to acquire needed right -of -way for the project. In addition to right of way acquisition from the Holiday property the City will be removing the two existing accesses from Lake Drive as part of the project. New access to the store will be provided from the proposed westerly extension of Town Center Parkway. Holiday has been supportive of the road improvement project and acquisition process. As part of the acquisition process Holiday is requesting approval of changes to the existing site to facilitate this transition. Phis application will not only establish revisions to the existing operations on the site in the form of some amendments to the existing Conditional Use Permit that are necessitated by the city improvements, but will also establish the means for Holiday to divide the property to sell an outlot for development, and ultimately a new Conditional Use Permit is requested for a Motor Fuel Station with Car Wash to rebuild the existing site with a new facility. The outlot will be reviewed to show that it can meet minimum standards for site design, however a site plan review will need to be completed for any development that occurs on the site in the future. SITE DETAILS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Motor Fuel Station Commercial GB (General Business) North Interstate 35W NA (Right of Way) NA (Right of Way) South Single Family Dwelling Commercial GB (General Business) East Lake Drive NA (Right of Way) NA (Right of Way) West Interstate 35W NA (Right of Way) NA (Right of Way) The comprehensive plan guides the site for Commercial development. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area and within the existing MUSA boundary. Public water and sanitary sewer are available along the *south property line and will occupy a portion of the Town Center Parkway alignment. Plat Details: Gross Area 3.79 acres Right of Way .32 acres Net Area 3.47 acres The proposed lots meet all of the requirements for area and street frontage for the GB (General Business) zoning district as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Easements are correctly depicted on the Preliminary Plat for the typical property boundaries and for the sewer and water mains, but Drainage and Utility easements need to cover all drainage ponds prior to the approval of the final plat. Joint Access easements also need to cover the driveway shared by both lots. Additionally, the final plat will need to reflect the Right of Way #3 plat done for the City's Lake Drive /Town Center improvement project, and clearly grant right of access to Anoka County along the Lake Drive street frontage. CONDITIONAL USES Existing Facility: • • The existing Conditional Use Permit allowing fuel sales on the site needs to be modified slightly to allow the facility to properly operate in conjunction with the Lake Drive /Town Center Parkway improvement project, and also to allow for the installation of two additional gasoline pumps. The Lake Drive reconstruction will require the existing pylon sign to be relocated as shown on the plans. Upon completion of the improvements the City and County have worked out an arrangement for one of the existing drives on Lake Drive to be closed immediately and the other to be closed within specific timeframe. These types of site changes also affect the existing Conditional Use Permit and will be clearly outlined in the conditions of approval and subsequent resolution. The Town Center Parkway construction project will provide access to the south side of the site and will require the removal of some curbing and parking area to allow proper circulation. The site will still provide 17 parking spaces which is adequate for the existing facility. The Lino Lakes City Council approved an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for a gas station at 7509 Lake Drive on September 27, 1999. This amendment was to allow the two additional pumps that were installed prior to city approval, to be turned on for use by the station. The following conditions were part of the 1999 approval: Holiday Lot (Lot 1) Lot 2 Lot Area 92,679 sf 59,587 sf Pervious Area 40,700 sf 44% 30,639 sf 51% Impervious Area 51,979 sf 56% 28,948 sf 49% Building Area 5,543 sf 6,500 sf The proposed lots meet all of the requirements for area and street frontage for the GB (General Business) zoning district as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Easements are correctly depicted on the Preliminary Plat for the typical property boundaries and for the sewer and water mains, but Drainage and Utility easements need to cover all drainage ponds prior to the approval of the final plat. Joint Access easements also need to cover the driveway shared by both lots. Additionally, the final plat will need to reflect the Right of Way #3 plat done for the City's Lake Drive /Town Center improvement project, and clearly grant right of access to Anoka County along the Lake Drive street frontage. CONDITIONAL USES Existing Facility: • • The existing Conditional Use Permit allowing fuel sales on the site needs to be modified slightly to allow the facility to properly operate in conjunction with the Lake Drive /Town Center Parkway improvement project, and also to allow for the installation of two additional gasoline pumps. The Lake Drive reconstruction will require the existing pylon sign to be relocated as shown on the plans. Upon completion of the improvements the City and County have worked out an arrangement for one of the existing drives on Lake Drive to be closed immediately and the other to be closed within specific timeframe. These types of site changes also affect the existing Conditional Use Permit and will be clearly outlined in the conditions of approval and subsequent resolution. The Town Center Parkway construction project will provide access to the south side of the site and will require the removal of some curbing and parking area to allow proper circulation. The site will still provide 17 parking spaces which is adequate for the existing facility. The Lino Lakes City Council approved an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for a gas station at 7509 Lake Drive on September 27, 1999. This amendment was to allow the two additional pumps that were installed prior to city approval, to be turned on for use by the station. The following conditions were part of the 1999 approval: • 1. Proper permits are obtained from all affected agencies. 2. The City Engineer reviews the ponding survey to confirm compliance. 3. Site lighting shall conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance in relation to light and glare and the applicant shall supply a photometric lighting plan to confirm compliance. 4. A 6 foot board on board fence shall be installed along the south property line to the south/west corner of the site. Additional evergreens shall be planted along the new fence line to provide a double row of evergreens, 10 feet apart. 5. Conditions 1 through 8, contained in the original permit, granted May 11, 1992, shall be made a part of this permit (conditions attached). 1. A curb barrier is to be provided to the east side of the site's southernmost row of parking as illustrated on Exhibit C. 2. Curb cut widths subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 3. Additional landscaping is provided to the south of the southernmost truck parking stall including trees from the end of the fence to the westernmost and /or the truck parking area. • 4. An assurance is made that the proposed screening fence is of a variety which will produce an effective 50% screen, a double row of evergreens, 10 feet apart, balled and burlapped. 5. The car wash shall not be constructed until such time as sewer and water is available, or an acceptable recycle system is devised to accommodate 100% of the water from the car wash. 6. Drainage and utility plans are subject to approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District. 7. Dispensing devices are in clear view of attendant at all times per section 10.903 of the State Fire Code. 8. City Council review and approve signage proposal. Staff recommends the following: a. Pylon - Existing pylon sign be raised to 65 feet as allowed by Ordinance. b. Ground Sign - Would be processed for a variance for the new downsized sign if determined to be necessary by the City Attorney. (May 26, 1992 regular Council meeting, City Attorney determined that a variance is needed if the sign is to be reduced in size. A variance would not be needed if present sign remains at the current site and not reduced in size.) c. Wall Signage - Lighted portion of sign be allowed as proposed with elimination of • lighting of the building and diesel canopy to the south. d. No additional signage allowed on site without an amended conditional use permit. 6. All conditions of approval shall be met prior to start-up of the two (2) new pump islands. 7. No tuck maintenance will be allowed on the site. • 8. Parking shall not be allowed along the south border of the property and in any unmarked spaces. Signs shall be installed to indicate the no parking zones. 9a. Three (3) parking spots on the south end of the site will be eliminated leaving only seven (7) parking spots, or 9b. The Oasis Market/Amoco will relocate the pond to the south side of the site leaving ten parking spots on the north end of the site. 10. MPCA testing will be conducted on an annual basis relating to noise and lighting. The applicant has worked with city staff to alleviate the truck parking on site and therefore the screening that was required in the past is no longer necessary. As such the applicant is requesting that these requirements be eliminated (staff would recommend condition numbers 4, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, and 9 be removed to accommodate the request). Compliance with all other conditions will be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the two additional fuel pumps. • Proposed Facility: The future use proposed for the Holiday Lot (Lot 1) is a Motor Fuel Station with Automatic Car Wash, both of which are listed as conditional uses within the GB (General Business) zoning district. Motor fuel stations provided that: a. Motor Fuel Facilities. Motor fuel facilities shall be installed in accordance with State and City standards. Additionally, adequate space shall be provided to access fuel pumps and allow maneuverability around the pumps. Underground fuel storage tanks are to be positioned to allow adequate access by motor fuel transports and unloading operations which do not conflict with circulation, access and other activities on the site. Fuel pumps shall be installed on pump islands. b. Architectural Standards. 1) As a part of the conditional use permit application, a color illustration of all building elevations shall be submitted. The applicant did not submit a colored elevation, which will be required prior to the City Council hearing this item. The color scheme is similar to that of the Blaine Holiday on Lexington Avenue. • • • • 2) The architectural appearance, scale, and functional plan of the building(s) and canopy shall be complementary and compatible with each other and the existing buildings in the neighborhood setting. The canopy will be shorter than the principal building and is finished with the same materials. 3) All sides of the principal and accessory structures are to have essentially the same or a coordinated harmonious finish treatment pursuant to Section 3, Subd. 4.B of this Ordinance. All sides of both structures will have a cohesive design that doesn't vary from side to side. 4) Exterior wall treatments like brick, stone (natural or artificial), decorative concrete block and stucco shall be used. The pillars for the canopy and the majority of the principal building are shown to be built with brick. The base of both structures is finished in rock faced cmu. 5) Earth tone colors of exterior materials including the canopy columns shall be required. "Earth tone colors" shall be defined as any various soft colors like those found in nature in soil, vegetation, etc., such colors are limited to brown, black, gray, tan, beige, brick red, soft green, soft blue, or white. The entire building will be constructed with brown, tan, beige, and white. 6) Ten (10) percent of the building facade may contain contrasting colors. Contrasting colors shall be those colors not defined as earth tones. The canopy may have contrasting color bands or accent lines not to exceed an accumulative width of four (4) inches. The color bands shall not be illuminated. Contrasts are provided on both structures between the EIFS finish, brick, and rock faced cmu. c. Canopy. A protective canopy structure may be located over the pump island(s), as an accessory structure. The canopy shall meet the following performance standards: 1) The edge of the canopy shall be thirty (30) feet or more from the front and /or side lot line, provided that adequate visibility both on -site and off -site is maintained. The Canopy is located a minimum of forty feet from any property line and visibility will not be affected by its proposed location. 2) The canopy shall not exceed eighteen (18) feet in height and must provide fourteen (14) feet of clearance to accommodate a semi - trailer truck passing underneath. The canopy is 14.5 feet from grade and would be 18 feet in height as shown. 3) The canopy fascia shall not exceed three (3) feet in vertical height. The fascia depicted on the elevations is exactly three feet in vertical height. 4) Canopy lighting shall consist of canister spotlights recessed into the canopy. No portion of the light source or fixture may extend below the ceiling of the canopy. Total canopy illumination may not exceed one hundred fifteen (115) foot candles below the canopy at ground level. • The lighting submitted is a mixture of recessed canisters that come close to meeting the ordinance and other spotlights directed on the pumps themselves which clearly exceed the requirements. A condition will require revised lighting fixture details and lighting plan showing conformance with this requirement. 5) The architectural design, colors, and character of the canopy shall be consistent with the principal building on the site. Both structures on the site are very consistent in design, colors and materials. 6) Signage may be allowed on a detached canopy in lieu of wall signage on the principal structure, provided that: a) The individual canopy sign does not exceed more than twenty (20) percent of the canopy • facade facing a public right -of -way. The signage depicted on the canopy is clearly less than 20 percent of the facade. 7) Canopy posts /sign posts shall not obstruct traffic or the safe operation of the gas pumps. The canopy supports and sign posts will not cause any obstruction of site circulation. d. Pump Islands. Pump islands shall comply with the following performance standards: 1) Pump islands shall be elevated six (6) inches above the traveled surface of the site. The pump islands are depicted with a full street curb which will provide the six inches of separation from the traveled surface. 2) All pump islands shall be set at least thirty (30) feet back from any property line. Additionally, the setback between the pump islands curb face must be at least twenty -four (24) feet. The pump islands are depicted as being a minimum of 45 feet from any property line and they are set exactly twenty four feet apart. • • • • e. Dust Control and Drainage. The entire site other than taken up by a building, structure, or plantings shall be surfaced with asphalt, concrete, cobblestone, or paving brick. Plans for surfacing and drainage shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Drainage from all fueling areas shall be directed to an oil /grit separator. Minimum design standards for the oil /grit separator shall include the following: 1) A minimum of four hundred (400) cubic feet of permanent pool storage capacity per acre of drainage area. 2) A minimum pool depth of four (4) feet. 3) A minimum oil containment capacity of eight hundred (800) gallons. 4) Minimum maintenance /inspection of two (2) times per year and /or after measurable spill events. A measurable spill shall be defined by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Any measurable spill event must be reported to the MPCA. The applicant is required to submit details on the oil/grit separator. f. Landscaping. 1) At least twenty -five (25) percent of the lot, parcel or tract of land used exclusively for the gas sales facility shall remain as a grass plot, including trees, shrubbery, plantings or fencing and shall be landscaped. Required minimum green area should be emphasized in the front and side yards abutting streets or residential property. The site plan indicates 51 % of the site is pervious, with large landscape islands along the three rights of way providing a vast majority of the pervious area. 2) At the boundaries of the lot, the following landscape area shall be required: a) From side and rear property lines, an area of not less than ten (10) feet wide shall be landscaped in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. With the exception of the west property line which is covered by a shared drive for the outlot, landscape islands of at least 15 feet in width are provided on all property lines. b) From all road rights -of -way, an area of not less than fifteen (15) feet wide shall be landscaped in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. Landscape islands of at least 15 feet in width are provided on all property lines abutting Town Center Parkway, Lake Drive, and Interstate 35W. c) Where lots abut residentially zoned property, a buffer yard of not less than twenty (20) feet • wide shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. The site is not adjacent to any residential zoning districts. d) The property owner shall be responsible for maintenance of all landscaping, including within the boulevard. The applicant will provide maintenance of all landscaping and the boulevard areas in accordance with city standards. Exterior Lighting. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the public right -of -way and shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of this Ordinance. A comprehensive lighting plan shall be submitted as part of the conditional use permit application, and shall be subject to the following performance standards: 1) Canopy Lighting. Canopy lighting shall only be permitted under the canopy structure, and shall consist of canister spotlights recessed into the canopy. No portion of the light source or fixture may extend below the ceiling of the canopy. Total canopy illumination below the canopy may not exceed one hundred fifteen (115) foot candles at ground level. • The lighting submitted is a mixture of recessed canisters that come close to meeting the ordinance and other spotlights directed on the pumps themselves which clearly exceed the requirements. A condition will require revised lighting fixture details and lighting plan showing conformance with this requirement. 2) Perimeter Lighting. Lighting at the periphery of the site and building shall be directed downward, and individual lights shall not exceed fifteen (15) foot candles at ground level. The applicant submitted parking lot lighting that is downward directed, shielded and does not exceed 15 foot candles. The building lighting includes a slight uplighting affect, but does not exceed the 15 foot candle maximum. 3) Illumination. Maximum site illumination shall not exceed four - tenths (.4) foot candle at ground level when measured at any boundary line with an adjoining residential property or any public property. The maximum foot candle at the property lines appear to exceed the 0.4 foot candle maximum and revised lighting plans will need to address this issue. • 4) Access. Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall comply with Section 3, Subd. 5 of this Ordinance. The access points were designed in conjunction with the Lake Drive/Town Center Parkway improvement plans and therefore will not cause any circulation issues or traffic movement issues. h. Circulation and Loading. The site design must accommodate adequate turning radius and vertical clearance for a semi - trailer truck. Designated loading areas must be exclusive of off - street parking stalls and drive aisles. A site plan must be provided to illustrate adequate turning radius, using appropriate engineering templates. The radius for the access points and within the site will provide adequate turning movements for semi - trailer trucks. i. Parking. J• • 1) Parking spaces shall be calculated solely based upon the use(s) and the square footage of the principal building(s). Parking Figure Code Requirement Spaces Required Spaces Provided Retail 2,880 s.f One (1) space for every 200 s.f. 15 Car Wash None required in addition to the motor fuel station parking 0 Motor Fuel Station Four (4) spaces plus one (1) for every employee 8 Total 23 26 The site is currently over parked by 3 spaces. This is based on the assumption of four employees on the maximum shift, which could fluctuate. 2) Parking spaces shall be screened from abutting residential properties in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. The site is not adjacent to any residential zoning districts. Noise. Public address system shall not be audible at any property line. Play of music or advertisement from the public address system is prohibited. Noise control shall be required as regulated in Section 3, Subd. 4.J of this Ordinance. The noise level of the PA system can not be judged until installed. The system will be tested prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the structure. k. Outside Storage, Sales and Service. No outside storage or sales shall be allowed, except as follow. 1) Public phones may be located on site as long as they do not interrupt on -site traffic circulation, and are not located in a yard abutting residentially zoned property. There are no payphones indicated on the plan, though the details indicate an exterior payphone option. If any are planned in the future they will need to meet this requirement and the location will need to be approved by the city prior to any installation. 2) Propane sales of twenty (20) pound capacity tanks may be located outside provided the propane tanks are secured in a locker and meets all State Uniform Building and Fire Codes. Large, bulk sale propane tanks must meet all applicable building and fire code requirements. There is no indication of propane sales facilities on the site plan. If planned for the future they will need to meet these requirements and the location will need to be approved by the city prior to any installation. 3) A compressed air service area may be located on site as long as it does not interrupt on -site traffic circulation. The compressed air service area is located adjacent to the front of the building and any user would need to park in the parking spaces provided south of the building to access th41111 hose. This will not interrupt on -site vehicular circulation in any way. 4) Accessory outdoor services, sales, or rental as regulated by Section 7, Subd. 3.G.6 of this Ordinance. There is no indication of any outdoor activities on the site. Outdoor display of items is fairly typical in the motor fuel industry, but considering the width of the sidewalk (6 feet) and the need to maintain pedestrian accessibility, staff does not support the use on this site along the front (south side) of the building. 1. Litter Control. The operation shall be responsible for litter control on the subject property, which is to occur on a daily basis. Trash receptacles shall be provided at a convenient location on site to facilitate litter control. The plans do not specify the location of trash receptacles, but they will be required prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building. • • m. Additional Stipulations. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying or expanding the conditions set forth herein. The Council may establish additional stipulations as part of the review of this request. Those items would need to be addressed with revised plans prior to approval, or could be conditioned as part of the approval document and enforced at time of construction. Commercial car washes (drive - through, mechanical and self - service) provided that: a. The site is serviced by municipal sanitary sewer. The site currently has access to a sanitary sewer main which is located within the future Town Center Parkway right of way. b. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or areas as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence. The building and the canopy are heavily clad in brick with EIFS accents. The building will be a clear improvement over the existing facility and will blend well with the properties on the east side of Lake Drive and the future development of the surrounding area on the west side of Lake Drive. c. Magazining or stacking space is constructed to accommodate that number of vehicles which can be washed during a maximum thirty (30) minute period and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The submitted plans do not indicate queuing spaces for the car wash, however the area dedicated to car wash circulation is over 160 feet in length which would accommodate approximately 8 vehicles which would equate to roughly 3.8 minute long wash cycles. Confirmation that this will be met on the site will be required. d. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than five (5) feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. The site is not adjacent to any residential zoning districts. e. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. The site is not adjacent to any residential zoning districts. • f The entire area other than occupied by the building or plantings shall be surfaced with material which will control dust and drainage which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The entire site shall be planted with sod or seed that will assist in the control of dust and drainage from the site. g. The entire area shall have a drainage system which is subject to the approval of the City. The site will feed into the storm and sanitary sewer systems. h. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the public right -of -way or from an abutting residence and shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of this Ordinance. The applicant submitted parking lot lighting that is downward directed, and appropriately shielded. The building lighting includes a slight accent uplighting. i. Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. J. The project is partially being driven by the Town Center Parkway and Lake Drive improvement project which will initially close the southern existing access point and allow access to the northern existing access point for a set period of time. After that is removed all access to the site will be off of Town Center Parkway and will greatly improve traffic movement in the area. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise. Typical MPCA standards will apply to the site and will be confirmed if noise levels exceed those anticipated for this type of development. This will specifically include the PA system. SITE DESIGN FOR THE FUTURE FACILITY Setback Requirements The proposed building meets or exceeds all of the setback requirements for the GB (General Business) zoning district. • • Principal Building Required Proposed Parking Lot Required Proposed Town Center Parkway 30 feet 165 feet 15 feet 20 feet Lake Drive 40 feet 75 feet 15 feet 15 feet Interstate 35W 40 feet 62 feet 15 feet 25 feet Side Yard 10 feet 87 feet 10 feet 30 feet The proposed building meets or exceeds all of the setback requirements for the GB (General Business) zoning district. • • II)Building Elevations The building materials used for the proposed structures include a base of rock faced CMU, brick covering of the canopy supports and building face, and EIFS finish for the canopy facade /top and building accents. All of these materials conform to the requirements of the zoning ordinance. Building Height According to the Zoning Ordinance, no building within the GB (General Business) zoning district may exceed 45 feet in height. At a maximum height of approximately 20 feet, 10 inches in height, the proposed motor fuel station and car wash complies with the ordinance. Landscaping The landscaping plan is conforming to the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance; however, staff would recommend that the applicant provide a hedge row along the south end of the southern parking area to limit the overflow of vehicle headlights onto Town Center Parkway and to improve the livability of the existing residential property on the south side of Town Center Parkway. Green Area The GB (General Business) zoning district requires that impervious surface coverage not exceed 75 %. Plans currently show the Holiday Store with an impervious surface coverage of 56% and the outlot with an impervious surface coverage of 49 %, both within the limitations of the district. Access /Circulation Access to the site is currently provided via two exit/entry drives directly from Lake Drive on the east side of the site. The Lake Drive and Town Center Parkway improvement project will create two exit/entry drives on the south side of the site via Town Center Parkway and will immediately close the southern drive on Lake Drive. The northern exit /entry drive from Lake Drive will remain for two years from the completion of the Town Center Parkway improvements. It will function only as a right in only to limit traffic conflict points. This access is for the existing facility and will cease upon the end of the two year time limit or the construction of a new facility, whichever occurs first. This access plan will provide the safest access to and from the site and the internal circulation will work well with the proposed layout. Pedestrian Circulation Sidewalks are provided on three sides of the principal building and provide appropriate access to the building from the main parking area. The width of the sidewalks (6 feet) will likely prohibit the display of merchandise in front of the building because of the need to provide full accessibility. A condition of approval is attached to prohibit the outdoor display of merchandise. • Lighting • The majority of the site is conforming to the lighting standards of the zoning ordinance; however the canopy lighting needs to be revised to clearly meet the requirements for being recessed into the canopy. Additionally, the lighting site plan needs to be revised to clearly depict property lines and conformance to the foot candle limitations. Parking This facility will be required to provide parking per the Motor Fuel Station parking standards as listed below. Parking Figure Code Requirement Spaces Required Spaces Provided Retail 2,880 s.f One (1) space for every 200 s.f. 15 Car Wash None required in addition to the motor fuel station parking 0 Motor Fuel Station Four (4) spaces plus one (1) for every employee 8 Total 23 26 The site is currently over parked by 3 spaces. This is based on the assumption of four employees on t o maximum shift, which could fluctuate. Signage Motor Fuel Stations that abut freeways are allowed one pylon sign addressing the freeway with a maximum area of 100 square feet and a maximum height of 65 feet; one additional sign with a maximum area of 32 square feet and a maximum height of 30 feet is allowed per street frontage (Lake Drive and Town Center Parkway). In this instance the freeway sign is existing and will not be moved; however, the existing sign on Lake Drive needs to be relocated as a result of the Town Center Parkway /Lake Drive improvement project. This sign exceeds the maximum area requirements, but due to the relocation caused by a city improvement project it will be allowed to be relocated on the site in its current configuration. Due to the fact that it more than doubles the area allowed per street frontage, a condition of approval prohibits the placement of an additional sign on Town Center Parkway unless the sign on Lake Drive is reduced to 32 square feet. The sign plan includes wall signage on the canopy fascia in lieu of the building itself, which includes only directional signage for the car wash. The signage on the canopy fascia meets the maximum area allowance which is 20% of the canopy fascia per side, with a maximum of two sides of the canopy having signage. Trash / Mechanical Equipment The building includes an integrated trash enclosure depicted on the east side of the building. The electrical transformer is shown on the west side of the building and therefore will have minimal visibility from th surrounding rights of way. •LJtilities The City Engineer has thoroughly reviewed the submitted utility plan and his comments are attached in memorandum form. A condition of this approval will require compliance with these comments. Stormwater management The attached memorandum from the City Engineer includes all of the comments related to Stormwater management and a condition will require compliance. The applicant has worked with Rice Creek Watershed District but no official review comments have been issued at this time. Compliance with the RCWD will be required as a condition of approval. Environmental Board Attached is a memorandum from the City Environmental Coordinator outlining the recommendations made by the Environmental Board on January 31, 2007. Many of the recommendations have been included as staff recommended conditions of approval below. • • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat, conditional use permits, and site plan review subject to the following conditions: • 1. The existing Conditional Use Permit is hereby amended to allow the existing facility to complete improvements necessitated by the city's Lake Drive /Town Center Parkway improvements and to allow for the installation of two additional gasoline pumps. This amendment will remove condition numbers 4, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, and 9 from the 1999 approval and is otherwise limited to the following changes: a. No fence will be required on the southern property line and no additional landscaping will be required to install the two additional pump islands. b. The curbing and parking area may be relocated to allow proper access to the new drive off of Town Center Parkway. c. The existing pylon sign on Lake Drive may be relocated as shown on the plan. d. The access drive on the south side of the Lake Drive frontage must be removed. e. The Conditional Use Permit shall not longer apply to the land hereby platted as Lot 2. 2. The Conditional Use Permits for a Motor Fuel Station and Automatic Car Wash shall apply only to Loll) 1 as shown on the Preliminary Plat. 3. The deadline for construction of the facility allowed by the approval of the Conditional Use Permits and Site Plan Review will not begin until the completion of the Town Center Parkway improvements. 4. Upon construction of the new facility the existing Conditional Use Permit shall be voided and the Conditional Use Permits approved as part of this review will be enforced. 5. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 6. The developer must enter into a site performance and stormwater maintenance agreement with the city prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 7. The preliminary plat must be revised to provide the following: a. Reference the parcel identification established for the Lake Drive and Town Center Parkway right of way by Right of Way Plat #3. b. The developer must convey to the city the appropriate drainage and utility easements along property lines, over the drainage areas, and along utility alignments. c. The developer must deed right of access to Anoka County along the Lake Drive frontage. • • • d. Cross access easements must be provided for the driveway shared by both lots. 8. The lighting plan/packet must be revised to provide the following: a. A revised lighting plan including shielded fixtures with 90 degree cut offs and a revised photometric plan that meets the maximum foot candle requirements. 9. The existing access on the north side of the Lake Drive frontage will be allowed to remain as a right in only access until such time that the agreement with the county and city expires or the new facility is constructed. 10. Pond and wetland areas must be planted with the city's native seed mix and managed for a minimum term of 3 years with a city approved contractor. 11. Colored elevations must be submitted for the principal building and fuel canopy. 12. No merchandise may be displayed outside of the principal building. 13. No ground sign may be installed on the Town Center Parkway street frontage for the Holiday Stationstore site unless the Lake Drive street frontage sign is reduced to 32 square feet in area. 14. Details of the required oil /grit separator and fuel spill catch basin system must be submitted for review by staff prior to approval. 15. The applicant will need to demonstrate that the Public Address system will not be audible from the property line at time of installation. 16. All flashing used for the building and canopy must be earth -tone in color and compatible with the rest of the principal building's color palette. 17. The landscaping plan should be revised to add a shrub row along the south parking area of sufficient height and density to provide a screen for vehicle headlights. 18. Prior to City Council review the applicant must submit three full sized plan sets and one 11x17 plan set depicting all revisions as required by the above conditions. ATTACHMENTS 1. Environmental Board comments from January 31, 2007 • 2. City Engineer memorandum dated February 2, 2007 3. Holiday Stationstore packet received February 9, 2007 • • • Environmental Board Recommendations January 31, 2007 The following Recommendations were made at the January 31, 2007 Environmental Board meeting concerning: Comforts of Home /CORE Development 1. Invasive species within the existing wetland should be eradicated as part of the site development and establish a healthy wetland for filtration and natural visual design. 2. The site should be modified to incorporate the required 10 foot buffer around the wetland and enhance greenway design. 3. A fueling site spill containment area should be designed into the plan. 4. Importing of soil shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. Pond designs should incorporate the use of for -bays for pretreatment and ease of maintenance. 6. Evaluate use of infiltration bmp's to treat parking lot runoff. 7. Provide adequate vehicle access to pond and infiltration areas. 8. A storm water maintenance agreement be executed between the City and Developer which includes a maintenance schedule for native planting and rain garden areas 9. The SWPPP be modified to incorporate the comments included in the SWPPP memo - attached. 10. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted. 11. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted in conformance with City requirements including screening plan for the west side of the property, rain garden planting schedules and irrigation. 12. The area of parking lot islands should be increased or combined to improve planting conditions. 13. The City Native Seed mix shall be used in all surface water management and buffer areas that are not formally planted 14. Roadway areas should be kept to a minimum. Motion to forward recommendations with attached SWPPP changes by Bor, second by Brouillet to approve, all were in favor. Holiday Stationstore 1. Recommend engineering look at an alternative to the pipe conveying storm water to the south of the proposed infiltration area. Alternatives desired from adding to a more comprehensive treatment train would include grassy swale, built with a system of check dams, and planted with deep rooting low- profile native plants. 2. Access locations to pond and infiltration areas must be shown on the map. 3. Pump stations should be designed with a spill- containment feature. 4. Combine sheets 8 and 9 of their submittal and rename the sheets Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan or SWPPP. Make changes to the SWPPP as per the attached memo to the City Engineer. 5. Provide a tree inventory of all significant trees on the site. Indicate if any of the trees can be saved or must be removed. If there are trees that can be saved, than provide a description of methods that will be used to save them. 6. On the Landscape Plan: • Sod areas must be indicated as irrigated. • Top soil must be indicated on the plan as tilled as deeply as possible into the sub - soils. • Storm ponds must be planted with the City Native Seed mix and modified with enhancement potted plants to achieve flowering forbs of one every 5 square feet. • A planting schedule should be submitted with native seed and plants included. • A contract with a City approved landscape company that is knowledgeable and experienced in native plant installation and maintenance should be submitted. The contract should cover installation and maintenance for at least the first 3 years. If a burn is possible at the end of three years this should be included in the contract. 7. All facility lighting should be planned at the minimum lumens and required design of the City code. All up- lighting must be kept to a minimum. 8. Holiday Stationstore should submit a remediation plan to the City should leakages be found to exist in fuel tank replacement areas. 9. Add buffering to attenuate light spill on adjacent property. Motion by Bor, second by Trailor to forward staff and Environmental Board recommendations on. All were in favor. Motion passed. • • • • • ATTACHMENT 13 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 25, 2007 TO: Jim Studenski FROM: Marty Asleson RE: Holiday Stationstore, Inc. SWPPP Review The following comments should be addressed: 1. On Attachment 8, under Erosion Control Notes, language should include NPDS compliance. 2. The second paragraph of the Erosion Control Notes, that "stone pads will be installed at all entrance /exit points." 3. The fifth paragraph of the same section should start out with "The contractor.... ", and the part about "when at all possible" removed. 4. The 6th paragraph should add "sediment deltas removed and slope erosion repaired in 7 days." Erosion and sediment control notes must include: • Narrative /project description, and purpose and goal of the project. • List of sequence of all soil disturbance activities. • Identify receiving waters. • Describe erosion control practices. Describe each control, its purpose, materials required, and installation methods. • Describe sediment control, its purpose, materials required, and installation methods. ATTACHMENT 13 • Describe post construction stormwater management controls and why they were selected. • Inspection and BMP maintenance plan. Should include NPDES stormwater permit (mandatory weekly and within 24 hours of 1/2 inch rain event or greater, and maintenance check list. • A table listing slopes and cover requirements within the slope categories of: 10:1 or flatter -21 days, 10:1 to 3:1 -7 days, greater than 3:1 -3 days. • Should say conveyances /ditches are covered in 24 hours of disturbance. In addition: Details of catch basin protection of existing storm sewers on Attachment 9 needs to be changed to reflect an approved storm water inlet protection device. Fabric over catch basins will not be allowed. A temporary storm pond should be located on the site. All storm water dewatering should be directed to a temporary pond. A temporary pond dewatering plan must be approved by the City prior to dewatering turbid water from the site. A concrete truck washout area must be located on the plan. A waste containment plan must be located on the plan. • • • • • C I — 0 F LtNQLKES Memorandum DATE: February 2, 2007 TO: Paul Bengston FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer S/C GJ RE: Holiday Station Stores- 7509 Lake Drive Attached please find a TKDA Review dated February 2, 2007, of the submitted documents for the Holiday Station Stores. All items must be addressed before final approval is given for this project. Contact me with any questions, thank you. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Reference: Holiday Stationstore Site Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Proj. No.: 13810.001 Date: February 2, 2007 Routing: The following drainage review is based on these submittals: 1. Holiday Stationstore Preliminary Grading, Utility, and Erosion Control Plans submitted by Insites, dated January 12, 2007. 2. Holiday Stationstore Preliminary Plat received by the City of Lino Lakes January 16, 2007. There are no significant issues with the project to be addressed prior to preliminary plat approval. Items to be addressed prior to final approval: 1. Cul -de -sac must be platted clearly to designate public right of way. 2. Traffic flow must align with access provided to Lot 2 (shared access may need to be relocated along property line). 3. Maintenance Agreement must be established for pond and storm sewer maintenance. 4. Sidewalk plan must be submitted for review. 5. The city project will provide utility stubs to both lots. Plans must conform to city design. 6. SAC /WAC determination must be submitted to conform to site improvements. 7. Copy of state and county permits must be submitted prior to approval. 8. Plans must reference city standards and details for any work to be completed in right of way. 9. Reference TKDA memo dated January 31, 2007 for drainage comments. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 fax www.tkda.com To: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Reference: Holiday Stationstore Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Proj. No.: 13810.001 Date: January 31, 2007 Routing: The following drainage review is based on these submittals: 1. Holiday Stationstore Preliminary Grading, Utility, and Erosion Control Plans submitted by Insites, dated January 12, 2007. 2. Holiday Stationstore Stormwater Management Calculations submitted by Sunde Engineering, PLLC, dated January 15, 2007. The following are significant issues that must be addressed prior to preliminary plat approval: 1. Rice Creek Watershed District will need to confirm that the wetland delineation shown on the Plans is a constructed pond and not a wetland. 2. Include all depressional storage on the site in the existing conditions model and route through the existing storm sewer that discharges to the I35W Right -of -Way. 3. Since disturbed pervious areas are typically compacted during grading operations and will be restored with topsoil, a curve number that corresponds to Type B soils should be used for all disturbed pervious areas in the proposed conditions model. 4. Existing and proposed rates may change due to modifications of the model based on comments 2 and 3 above. Rate control requirements will be reviewed when the updated models are re- submitted. 5. The water quality volume in the proposed pond may change due to modifications of proposed curve numbers based on comment 3 above. The water quality volumes will be reviewed when the updated calculations are re- submitted. The following are minor plan, calculations, and drafting corrections that must be addressed prior to final approval: 1. Include a detail of the pond outlet structure on the Plans. 2. Include a `rip -rap at flared end section' detail on the Plan. •3. Show the location of erosion control blanket on the Plan. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Holiday Stationstore Page 2 January 31, 2007 Drainage Calculation Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 4. Indicate the pipe size, slope and invert elevation of the existing pipe the discharges to the 35W right - of -way on the Plans. 5. Label the inverts of all flared end sections on the Plans. 6. All City- maintained storm sewer, including pond outlet structure pipes, are required to be a minimum of 15 inches in diameter. 7. The storm sewer design may change due to modifications of proposed curve numbers based on comment 3 (significant issues) above. The storm sewer design will be reviewed when the updated calculations are re- submitted. 8. Indicate the overland emergency overflow location and elevation of all ponds and parking lot /road low points on the Grading Plan. Low openings are required to be a minimum of 1 foot above the emergency overflow elevation. 9. Provide a cross - section detail of the infiltration basin on the Plans that includes information such as the depth and type of soil mixture. 10. Label the high water level of the infiltration basin on the Plans. 11. Include notes on the grading plan incorporating the following: 1) the proposed infiltration area should be staked off and marked during construction to prevent heavy equipment from compacting the soil, 2) the infiltration area should not be excavated to final grade until the contributing drainage areas have been constructed and fully stabilized, and 3) final excavation of the infiltration areas should be • completed using light tracked equipment to avoid compacting the basin floor. 12. To provide a well aerated, highly porous surface, the soils of the infiltration basin floor should be loosened to a depth of at least 12 inches prior to planting. 13. Indicate the type and location of vegetation used in the ponding areas. It is highly recommended that mature plants be used over seed in the infiltration basin. Fluctuating water levels following seeding can cause seed to float and be transported downstream of the infiltration basin. In addition, it may take up to two growing seasons to establish the function and aesthetic value of mature vegetation using seeds. 14. The MPCA NPDES Permit requires that the design storm runoff volume in the proposed infiltration basin infiltrate within 48 hours. 15. Submit a geotechnical report for review. The lowest floor elevation is required to be 4 feet above the seasonal high ground water elevation. 16. Runoff from the site discharges to the Interstate Highway 35W right -of -way; therefore, permit approval from Mn/DOT may be required. 17. Submit a copy of the NPDES permit for the City's records when available. 18. Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is required. Submit a copy of the RCWD Permit when available. FEATURES OPTICAL • Reflector — Self- flanged, specular clear or semi - diffuse reflector. Bounding Ray Optical Principle design provides lamp before lamp image and smooth transition from top of reflector to bottom, Minimum flange matches reflector finish. White painted flange optional. • Baffle /cone — Specular clear upper reflector. Microgroove baffle with white painted flange or specular black cone with flange that matches cone finish. MECHANICAL • 16 -gauge galvanized steel mounting /plaster frame with friction support springs to retain optical system. Accommodates up to 7/8" thick ceiling standard. See Accessories for increased ceiling thickness capability. • Mounting bars are 16 -gauge galvanized steel with continuous 4" vertical adjustment, held in place with tool -less, cam - action locking system. Post installation adjustment possible without the use of tools from above or below the ceiling. Shipped pre - installed. • Galvanized steel junction box with bottom - hinged access covers and spring latches. Two combination 1/2" -3/4" and four 1" knockouts for straight- through conduit runs. Capacity: 8 (4 in, 4 out) No. 12 AWG conductors rated for 90 °C. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Die -cast aluminum lampholder housing. Designed for effective heat dissipation and positive light center positioning. • Medium -base porcelain socket with nickel - plated screw shell. Extended porcelain socket for "open fixture" rated metal halide lamps. • Prewired, encased -and- potted, 120/277V or 120/347V ballast tray module. Module can be attached before or after mounting of mounting /plaster frame. • Thermally- activated insulation detector. LISTING • Fixtures are UL Listed for thru- branch wiring, recessed mounting end damp locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (see Options). ENERGY LER.DOL Annual Lamps Lamp Energy Cost Lumens 44 $5.47 (1)100W MHC 8700 Ballast Factor 1.00 Input Watts 125 Calculated in accordance with NEMA standard LE -5. Type ' 6 w Catalog number ■ HID Downlights 8" AH Open Reflector MH or HPS Lamp VILA 0 -- 9-3/16(23.3) Aperture: 7 -7/8 (20.0) Ceiling opening: 8 -1/2 (21.6) Overlap trim: 9-1/8 (23.2) All dimensions are inches (centimeters). ORDERING INFORMATION Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it onthe appropriate line. Order accessories es separate catalog numbers (shipped separately). AH IoONMC. l I Series Wattage/Lamp Reflectortype AH Metal Halide BAR 50M MP50 /C/U /MED 8PR 70M MP70 /C /U /MED 8WTR 100M MP100 /C /U /MED BUBR 150M' MP150 /C /U /MED 8CR Color Corrected Metal Halides 8GR 50MHC MPC50 /C /MED 8MB' 70MHC MPC70 /C /MED 8BC' 100MHC MPC100 /C /MED 150MHC MPC150 /C /MED High Pressure Sodium 50S LU50 /D /MED 70S LU70 /D /MED 100S LU100 /D /MED 150S LU150 /D /MED Clear Pewter Wheat Umber Champagne Gold Gold Black Baffle Black Cone Finish (blank) Specular low iridescent ID Semi - diffuse low iridescent Example: AH 100M 8AR 120 Voltage 120 277 347 Accessories Options WLP TRW LRC4 QRS5 Order as separate catalog number. QRSTDa SC8 NOTES 1 Not available in 347V. 2 Ceramic arc tube consistent -color lamp. Philips MasterColor or GE ConstentColor. 3 Not available with finishes. 4 For compatible Reloc systems, refer to CTA8 options and accessories tab. 5 Not available with QRSTD or EC. 6 Not available with QRS or EC. 7 Not available with QRS or aRSTD. Sloped ceiling adaptor. Degree of slope must be specified (10D, 15D, 20D, 250, 30D). Ex: SC8 10D. Ceiling thickness adaptor (extends mounting frame to accommodate ceiling thickness up to 21. EC' SF CSA HEB With lamp (shipped separately). White painted flange. (Standard with 8MB.) Provides compatibility with Lithonia Reloc System. Quartz restrike system (uses maximum 100W DC base quartz lamp by others). Quartz restrike system with time delay. Operates like QRS, except quartz lamp remains on for two minutes after HID lamp restrikes. Emergency circuit (DC socket with leads for connection to external emergency power source; maximum 100W lamp). Single fuse. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards. Electronic ballast. gotham® (14 M iladly&andsComparry GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWNLIGHTING A DIVISION OF ACUITY LIGHTING GROUP, INC, 1400 Lester Road Conyers Georgia 30012 P 800 315 4982 F 770 860 3129 www.gothaml ighting.com AH 8 OPEN DHID -220 FE3 0 3 2007 HFILE !j O f 8" AH Open Reflector Distribution curve Distribution data Output data Coefficient of utilization Illuminance Data at30'AboveFloorfor a Single Luminaire AH 1DOM 8AR, (1) MP100 /C/U/MED Tamp, 7900 rated lumens,1.2 s /mh, test no. LTL7957 pf 20% From 0° cp. Lumens Zone Lumens %lamp pc 80% 70% 50% 0° 4082 0 0 ° -30° 3647 46.2 pw 50% 30% 50% 30% 50%30% 5° 4203 411 0 °-40° 5165 65.4 1 84 82 83 81 80 78 15° 4779 1339 0 0-600 6046 76.5 2 78 75 77 73 74 72 45 25° 4177 1896 00-900 6054 76.6 3 72 68 71 67 69 66 35° 2453 1518 90° -180° 0 0.0 4 67 62 66 61 64 60 45° 892 711 00 -1800 6054 76.6* 5 62 57 61 56 59 55 55° 159 170 *Efficiency 6 57 52 57 52 55 51 65° 4 7 7 53 48 53 48 52 47 75° 0 1 8 50 45 49 45 48 44 85° 0 0 9 47 42 46 41 45 41 90° 0 0 10 44 39 43 39 43 38 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 0° 50% 10 °% beam angle 62.1° beam angle 86.7° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 134.9 6.6' 67.5 10.4' 13.5 10' 72.6 9.0' 36.3 14.2' 7.3 12' 45.2 11.4' 22.6 17.9' 4.5 14' 30.9 13.8' 15.4 12.7' 3.1 16' 22.4 16.2' 11.2 25.5' 2.2 AH 100MHC 8AR, (1) MPC100 /CN/MED lamp, 8700 rated lumens, 1.3 s /mh, test no. LTL7958 pf 20% 0 0 ° Po w 50% 30% 50 %70 30% 50 %30% 0 3829 0 0 -3D 3446 39.6 p 5° 3920 379 0 ° -40° 5214 59.9 1 82 80 81 79 78 76 15° 4224 1200 0 ° -60° 6511 74.8 2 75 72 74 71 72 69 45° 25° ° 4108 1866 90° -180° 6525 5 75.0 3 69 65 68 64 66 11 57 45° 1291 1012 00-1800 6525 75.0* 5 59 54 58 53 56 52 55° 278 285 *Efficiency 6 54 49 54 49 52 48 65° 8 12 7 50 45 50 45 49 44 75° 1 2 8 46 41 46 41 45 41 D° 850 0 0 9 43 38 43 38 42 38 90° 0 0 10 40 35 40 35 39 35 900 180 2700 3600 4500 From O° cp. Lumens Zone Lumens %lamp 50% 10% beam angle 65.6° beam angle 92.4° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount et beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 126.6 7.1' 63.3 11.5' 12.7 10' 68.1 9.7' 34.0 15.6' 6.8 12' 42.4 12.2' 21.2 19.8' 4.2 14' 29.0 14.8' 14.5 24.0' 2.9 16' 21.0 17.4' 10.5 28.1' 2.1 AH 150M 8AR, (1) MP150 /C/U /MED lamp, 12000 rated Iumens, 1.2 s /mh, test no. LTL7959 90° From 0° cp. Lumens Zone Lumens %lamp pc 80% 0% 50% heam 5060.9° beam angle 88.1° 00 6416 0 00 300 5191 43.3 pw 50% 30% 509° 0% 50%30% Initial fc angle fc at gfc at 1300 5 6522 625 00-40° 7564 63.0 1 84 82 82 80 79 78 Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam ` 15° 6554 1854 0 ° -60° 9134 76.1 2 77 74 76 73 73 71 height center diameter edge diameter edge 2600 pp)N�>•���� 45 25° 5982 2712 0 0-900 9144 76.2 3 71 67 70 66 68 65 " ����� 350 3857 2373 90° -180° 0 0.0 4 66 61 65 60 63 59 8' 212.1 6.5' 106.0 10.6' 21.2 3900 �A�� ►�� 45° 1578 1244 00-180° 9144 76.2* 5 61 56 60 55 58 54 10' 114.1 8.8' 57.0 14.5' 11.4 5�..�,�t °_. 55° 304 326 *Efficiency 6 56 51 56 51 54 50 12' 71.1 11.2' 35.5 18.4' 7.1 �j/r ♦ 65° 6 10 7 52 47 52 47 51 46 14' 48.5 13.5' 24.3 22.2' 4.9 6500�t 75° 0 0 8 49 43 48 43 47 43 16' 35.2 15.9' 17.6 26.1' 3.5 0° 85° 0 0 9 45 40 45 40 44 40 90° 0 0 10 42 38 42 37 41 37 AH 100MHC 8MB, (1) MPC100 /C /U /MED lamp, 8700 rated lumens, 1.2 s /mh, test no. LTL8005 840 1680 2520 3360 4200 ►':�5�0° 11 �5�. 0° 3899 0 0 ° -30° 3224 37.1 ptp��,, 4 5° 3939 379 0 ° -40° 4732 54.4 110, ,,A∎ ���� 15° ° 4149 1169 00-60° ° 90° 5883 67 8 I�����,+ 45° 35° 2445 1509 90° -180° 0 0.0 111����� • 65° 274 267 Efficiency 895 67.8* M: fit ° 90° 0 0 0 From 0° cp. Lumens Zone Lumens %lamp 0° pf P w 1 74 73 73 71 70 69 2 68 65 67 64 65 63 3 63 59 62 58 60 57 4 58 54 57 53 56 52 5 53 49 53 48 51 48 6 49 45 49 44 48 44 7 46 41 45 41 44 40 8 43 38 42 38 41 35 10 37 33 37 33 36 32 20% 80% 70% 50% 50% 30% 50% 30% 50 %30% 50% 10% beam angle 60.7° beam angle 90.4° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 128.9 6.4' 64.4 11.1' 12.9 10' 69.3 8.8' 34.7 15.1' 6.9 12' 43.2 11.1' 21.6 19.1' 4.3 14' 29.5 13.5' 14.7 23.1' 2.9 16' 21.4 15.8' 10.7 27.2' 2.1 AH 100MHC BBC, (1) MPC100 /C /U /MED Tamp, 8700 rated lumens, 1.2 s /mh, test no. LTL8004 cp. Lumens pf 20% From 0° c p pc 80% 7090 50% 0° 3835 0 0 0-300 3186 36.6 pw 50% 301/4 501/4 301/4 50 %30% 5° 3880 374 0 ° -40° 4664 53.6 1 73 71 72 70 69 68 15° 4093 1154 0 ° -60° 5772 66.3 2 67 64 66 63 64 61 25° 3658 1658 0 ° -90° 5786 66.5 3 62 58 61 57 59 56 45° 35° 2395 1478 90° -180° 0 0.0 4 57 53 56 52 55 51 45° 1094 855 00-1800 5786 66.5* 5 52 48 52 48 51 47 55° 257 253 *Efficiency 6 49 44 48 44 47 43 65° 8 13 7 45 40 45 40 44 40 75° 1 1 8 42 37 41 37 41 37 85° ° 0 0 9 39 35 39 34 38 32 840 1680 2520 3360 4200 0° Zone Lumens %lamp 50% 10% beam angle 60.8° beam angle 90.1° Initial fc fc at fc at Mount at beam Beam beam Beam beam height center diameter edge diameter edge 8' 126.8 6.5' 63.4 11.0' 12.7 10' 68.2 8.8' 34.1 15.0' 6.8 12' 42.5 11.1' 21.2 19.0' 4.2 14' 29.0 13.5' 14.5 23.0' 2.9 16' 21.0 15.8' 10.5 27.1' 2.1 NOTES: 1. For electrical characteristics consulttechnical data teb. 2. Tested to current IES'and NEMA standards under stabilized laboratory conditions. Various operating factors can cause differences between laboratory data and actual field measure- ments. Dimensions and specifications are based on the most current available data and are subject to change without notice. DHID -220 02003 Gotham, Rev. 01/03 DHID- 220.p65 got h a m A 59ad1yB�r�Compay GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWNLIGHTING A DIVISION OF ACUITY LIGHTING GROUP, INC. 1400 Lester Road Conyers Georgia 30012. P 800 315 4982 F 770 860 3129 www.gothamlighting.com fr3 0 2001 F i! fi ENCORE® - FLAT LENS - DOUBLE OR SINGLE DECK APPLICATIONS HOUSING - Die -cast, one -piece aluminum ensures durable, weather -tight construction. Two threaded conduit openings allow through wiring. LENS /GASKET - Choose either a flat clear tempered glass lens or a C73 diffused flat tempered glass lens. A continuous one -piece extruded high temperature gasket ensures maximum sealing to the housing. LENS FRAME /DOOR FASTENER - Features an integral hinged, die -cast aluminum lens frame. Door frame closes and locks with stainless steel spring catch, allowing easy access for ground re- lamping. INSTALLATION - One- person installation. No additional sealant required. REFLECTORS/DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS - The vertical bum optical system and symmetrical reflector provide uniform general lighting under the canopy. LIGHT SOURCES - Pulse -Start Metal Halide or Metal Halide Reduced Envelope. BALLASTS - High-power factor type ballasts. Pulse -Start Metal Halide features Super CWA ballasts and Metal Halide features CWA ballasts. Ballasts are designed for -20 degree F operation. Electrical components are serviceable from below. FINISH - Standard colors are white or bronze powder coat finish. Each fixture Is finished with LSI's DuraGrip® polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling, and is guaranteed for five full years. WARRANTY - The Encore carries a comprehensive 5 -year warranty on all parts, finish, workmanship and electrical components (excluding lamp). PHOTOMETRICS - For detailed photometric data, contact LSI Petroleum Lighting Sales. c1US LISTED wet location CE Consult Factory. 02004 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. Petroleum Lighting Flat - lensed Mures meet IESNA full cut-off classification. Protected by the following patents: 5,662,407 6,059,422 6,152,579 6,224,233 6,464,378 Patentado 199,294 CA2276077 CA2381049 and Pat. Pend. DIMENSIONS 11 -9/16' 15.3/4' — 12" 12° 14 -5/15` Deck requires 12' opening with 2' radius corners. NOTE: Encore cannot be mounted In a single skin canopy with 12' deck pans. FEB 0 2007 Project Name 1 Fixture Type Catalog 4 ENCORE® - FLAT LENS - DOUBLE OR SINGLE DECK APPLICATIONS LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION Luminaire Prefix EC Distribution S - Symmetrical Lamp Wattage 175 200 i Light Source Lens ulse -Start Metal Halide 5, 200, 250, 320 Watt MHR - Metal Halide Reduce 400 Watt ■riear G pared Glass C73 - Diffused Flat Tempered Glass Line Voltage ®Multl-Taps TT -Td -Tape 220V - 50Hz Luminaire Finish P White - Bronze EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER EC S 250 PSMV MT WHT FOOTNOTES: 1- MT — Multi Tap Is shipped standard unless otherwise specified. Multi Tap consists of 120V, 208V, 240V, and 277V. Multi Tap Is pre -wired for 277V. Alternate voltages will require field re- wiring. 2- TrI -Tap Is shipped standard for Canadian applications. Trl -Tap consists of 120V, 277V, and 347V. Trl -Tap is pre -wired for 347V. Alternate voltages will require field re- wiring. 3- Order when fixtures are to be used In enclosed ceilings. Voltage must be specified 120V, 208V, 240V, 277V, 347V or 220V 50Hz. 4- Consult Factory. ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number ECKEC - Thin Canopy Kit for Encore Ground Lamp Changers: 250, 320, 400 (Reduced) Watt 200 Watt 176008 13267BA 179101Z DUI - DOUBLE DECK MDIJNTING BRACKET (ORDER NUMBER 174806) UPTURNED FLANGE (8 ) RE UHOIES CEIUNG ROOF UPTURNED FLANGE OF MOUNT BRACKET BRACKET 174806 DDM - For use In covered areas (i.e. water proof plenum) where ceiling material will not support the fixture or access is not available from above to utilize standard locking ring. ILL C RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Options TH - Thermally Protecteda CE - European Compliant4 SORP SINGLE DECK RETROFIT PANEL (ORDER NUMBER 180292) CANOPY DECK RED GASKET BETWEEN PANEL AND DECK SDRP - Single deck decorative retrofit panel facilitates conversions from 2x2 surface mounted fixture to Encore. DECORATIVE PANEL 180292 DDRMP - DOUBLE DECK RETROFIT MOUNTING PANEL (ORDER NUMBER 177825) ROOF DECORATIVE PANEL 177825 DDRMP - Decorative retrofit panel Is for use on double deck canopies only. Panel will structurally support the Encore while covering an opening up to 600mm by 600mm. For use In covered areas only (Le water proof plenum). 02004 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. Project Name 1 Fixture Type Catalog # 13 Petroleum Lighting' • • CHALLENGER® (Various reflectors are protected by U.S. Patent No. 6,464,378.) HOUSING - Rectangular shaped, multl- radlused, one- piece, die -cast aluminum with cast mounting arm. All hardware is stainless steel or electro -zinc plated steel. DOOR FRAME - One- piece, die -cast aluminum door frame secures to the housing with two Internal hinges. Two stainless steel captive door fasteners allow easy access. Door frame may be removed without tools. A one -piece extruded silicone gasket seals the door frame against the housing. The standard housing/door seal design prevents external contaminants from entering the Challenger, resulting in an IP65 rating for all versions. LENS /GASKET - Contoured clear impact resistant glass lens for vertical lamp optics. A tempered flat clear glass lens or contoured clear impact resistant glass lens is offered for horizontal lamp optics. A one -piece extruded silicone gasket seals the lens to the die -cast aluminum door frame. SOCKETS - Porcelain mogul -base sockets. All sockets are factory prewired with a disconnect plug for the ballast All sockets are pulse - rated. LIGHT SOURCES - Pulse -Start Metal Halide, Super Metal Halide, Metal Halide, Metal Halide Reduced Envelope, or High Pressure Sodium. Clear lamp is supplied as standard. BALLASTS - High -power factor ballast with removable/hinged ballast tray. Pulse -Start Metal Halide fixtures feature a Super CWA type ballast. Metal Halide, Super Metal Halide, and High Pressure Sodium fixtures feature a CWA type ballast All ballasts are designed for -20° F operation. Optional Quick Connect package includes supply wiring plus modular plugs for easy ballast wiring. REFLECTORS/DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS - Vertical Bum systems include: Type II (2), Type III (3), Type V (5), Perimeter Forward Throw (FP), Automotive Forward Throw (FA), and ART (Advanced Reflector Technology) optical systems: Automotive Forward Throw (AFT) and Automotive Interior (Al). Horizontal Burn systems include: Type III (3), Type V (5) and Forward Throw (FT). All reflectors are field - rotatable, enabling generous flexibility in distribution patterns, without fixture movement. Photometric data is tested in accordance with IESNA guidelines. BRACKETS - Cast mounting arm is flat for square pole applications. Fixture may also be mounted to round poles using the round pole adaptor accessory (RPPC), which must be ordered separately. An extruded 6" arm extension is required for 090°, Q90 °, T90° and TN 120° fixture configurations. A locking nut secures two through bolts and a reinforcing plate to the pole, stabilizing it for easy fixture mounting. FINISHES - Each fixture is finished with LSI's DuraGrip® polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling, and is guaranteed for five full years. Standard colors Include bronze, black, platinum plus, buff, white, green, metallic sliver, and graphite. PHOTOMETRICS - Please visit our web site at www.isl- Industrles.com for detailed photometric data. c L gs 1P65 UMW watioaaeon Flat - lensed factures meet IESNA full cutoff classification, DIMENSIONS 6.1/2 3- /2° pp tvreep Bracket - BM-BO-S-19 Weight 15Ibs. EPA • 0.4 LUMINAIRE EPA CHART With Extension Arm F C7 Challenger Cast Arm F CT Single 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.3 ■•-• D180° 3.7 4.1 4.3 4.6 gm D90° Extension Arm Required 3.9 4.3 f% Tge° 6.1 6.5 T11120° 6.3 8.9 Q90° 7.7 8.6 Note: F - Flat Glass CT - Contoured Note: House Side Shield adds to fixture EPA. Consult factory. SHIPPING WEIGHTS - Challenger Catalog Number Est: Weight (Ibs.) Length (ins Widib (In.) Height (in.) CHV 86 34.5 23.75 18.25 CHH 86 34.5 23.76 18.25 RECERJEr FEB 0 9 2007. CITY OF LINO LAKES Outdoor Lighting Project Name I Fixture type Catalog #i I ® 2006 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. CHALLENGER® LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION Luminalre Prefix Distribution Lam Watta Vertical Burn CHV 2 -Type 11 *3 -1ype III 5 - Type V FP- Forward Throw Perimeter FA- Automotive Foward Throw Advanced Reflector Technology Optical Systeme AFT - Automotive Foward Throw Al- Automotive Interior e Light Source Lens Line Luminalre Voltage" Finish 250 *rPSMV — Pulse -Start Metal Halide se 320 250, 320, 400, 750, 10001 Watt 400 SMV — Super Metal Halide 750 400 Watt 1000 MH - Metal Halide 250, 400 Watt MHR — Metal Halide Reduced Envelope 1000 Watt 750 HPS — High Pressure Sodium 1000 250,400,7502 Watt CT — Contoured Clear Impact - resistant Glass Horizontal Burn CHH 3—Type 111 FT— Forward Throw 5 — Type V 250 320 400 750 1000 PSMH - Pulse -Start Metal Halide 320, 750, 1000 SMH — Super Metal Halide 250, 400 Watt MH - Metal Halide 250, 400 Watt MHR - Metal Halide Reduced Envelope 1000 Watt HPS — High Pressure. Sodium 250, 400, 7502 Watt F — Flat Cleary Tempered Glass CT — Contoured Clear Impact - resistant Glass 480 rM f • Multi Tap6 TT - Tri •Tap CHV 5 1000 MHR CT MT rK BRZ - Bronze BLK - Black PLP- Platinum Plus BUF - Buff WHT - White GRN • Green GPT - Graphlte MSV - Metallic Silver MSV PCR EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER Options PCR :Photoelectric Control Receptacle? QC - Quick Connect Package GR - Ground Relampinge LL - Less Lamp FOOTNOTES: 1- Tri Tap not available In 1000 Watt PSMV. Voltage must be specified -120V, 277V, or 347V 2- When ordering 750 Watt High Pressure Sodlum, voltage must be specified. 3- Use to match vertical appearance. 4- For International voltages, consult factory. 5- MT— Mufti Tap Is shipped standard unless otherwise specified. Multi Tap consists of 120V, 206V 240V and 277V. Multi Tap Is pre- wlred for highest voltage. Altemate voltages will require field re- wiring, 6- Trl -Tap Is shipped standard for Canadian applications. Tri-Tap consists of 120V, 277V, and 347V. Tri-Tap Is pre-wired for highest voltage. Alternate voltages will require field re- wiring. 7- Factory Installed PCR requires field wiring to proper voltage. On QC version, PCR is factory pre-wired to highest voltage. Alternate voltages will require field re- wiring. 8 - Ground relamptng option Is avallable for CHV only. Maximum tool length 15 ft. See below for Ground Lamp Changer. ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Order Number 143586BLK+ 143587BLK+ 143587BLK+ 143587BLK+ 141940CLR 123111CLR Description PC120 - Photocell PC20B - Photocell PC240 — Photocell PC277 — Photocell PC347 — Photocell PC480 — Photocell FK120 - Sinale Fusing FK277 - Sinale Fusing DFK208, 240 - Double Fusing DFK480 - Double Fusing FK347 - Single Fusing Order Number 122514 122515 122516 122517 159516 1225180 FK120 FK277 DFK208, 240 DFK480 FK347 HOUSE SIDE SHIELDS 1 TYPE II • 3 -5/r (143586BLK) Description CHH /CHV 2 HSS - Extemal House Side Shield CHH/CHV 3 HSS — External House Side Shield CHV FA/AFT HSS — External House Side Shield CHH/CHV FP/FT HSS — External House Side Shield RPPC- Round Pole Plate BKS- BO -WM -* -CLR Wall Mount Plate BKA- BO -EC-6 -CLR Extension Arm Required for multiple mounting © all 90° & 120° configurations BKU- BO- S- 19-CLR Upsweep Bracket for round and sauare Doles 142862CLR 144191CLR Ground Lamp Changer 132678A 146018A (250, 320 Watt) (400 SW, 1000 Watt Reduced & 750 Watt HPS) +Black only.. I TYPE Iii AND 8 -78' FORWARD THROW (FA/FP /AFT) (143587BLK) RECk. FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Outdoor Lighting Project Name t Fixture Type Catalog © 2008 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. CASCADE HOUSING AND ACCENT BAND - Housing and accent band are constructed from a galvanized coated steel that accepts paint without pretreatment and is used to achieve superior paint adhesion. WALL MOUNT - Ballast housing features a 1/2" conduit entry from the rear or a close nipple can be used off of a J -box. Mount ballast housing with two screw type fasteners first and wire unit. Housing and accent band are designed to slip over ballast housing and secured with the same fasteners used to secure ballast housing. Re- tamping is achieved by loosening two screws and removing housing and accent band then removing four nuts securing refractor. GLOBE - Made of tempered soda lime glass with a ceramic- sprayed frosted interior. Tempering improves thermal endurance and the ceramic spray diffuses light without compromising glass strength. An EPDM gasketseals globe to housing. SOCKETS - Pulse- rated porcelain medium -base sockets. LIGHT SOURCES - Metal Halide and High Pressure Sodium. Clear Tamp is supplied as standard. Photometric data is tested in accordance with IESNA guidelines. BALLASTS • High -power factor type ballast is mounted to the housing reinforcing plate. The ballast is designed for -20" F operation. FINISHES - Each fixture is finished with LSI 's DuraGrip polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling, and is guaranteed for five full years. Standard colors include bronze, black, platinum plus, buff. white, green, metallic silver, and graphite. The accent band is available in bronze, black, platinum plus, buff, white, green, metallic silver, and graphite. • PHOTOMETRICS • Please visit our web site at www.Isi- intkrstries.com for detailed photometric data. c C us U$TED wet location TYPICAL APPLICATION DIMENSIONS 17" I I r BACK VIEW MOUNTING DETAIL 5.6' 5" 5° 8.4" 15° —Housing 1/2" Conduit Entry — Ballast Housing 1/4" Mounting Holes Typical (2) SHIPPING WEIGHTS - Cascade Catalog Number Est. Weigle (Ibs,) Length On.) Width (in) Height On.) CASB 28 18.5 12 14.5 RECEfIE:: FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Project Name 1 Fixture Type ir Automotive Lighting., Catalog # 2006 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. CASCADE LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION Luminaire Lamp Prefix Wattage CASB - Solid Accent Band 100 Light Source Metal Halide 0, 70,100 Watt HPS - High Pressure Sodium 50, 70,100 Watt Luminaire Finish2 Color Band Bronze I- 14L - Bronze - Black BLK - Black PLP - Platinum Plus PLP - Platinum Plus BUF - Buff BUF - Buff WHT - White WHT - White GRN - Green GRN - Green GPT - Graphite GPT - Graphite MSV - Metallic Silver CASB 70 MH 120 BRZ BUF EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER FOOTNOTES: 1- 120V and 277V Standard - Consult factory for availability of other voltages. 2. Refers to housing FI Options LL - Less Lamp RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES � • Project Name 1 Fixture Type 8 Automotive Lighting"' Catalo # 0 2006 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. ENCORE® FOCUS - DOUBLE OR SINGLE DECK APPLICATIONS HOUSING - Die -cast, one -piece aluminum ensures durable, weather -tight construction. Two threaded conduit openings allow through wiring. DOOR FRAME/DOOR FASTENER - Features an integral hinged, die -cast aluminum door with a powder coat finish. Door frame closes and locks with stainless steel spring catch. INSTALLATION - One- person installation. No additional sealant required. OPTICAL ASSEMBLY - The optical assembly directs light specifically to the areas you wish to light. It can be adjusted vertically plus or minus 6 degrees and horizontally 350 degrees to allow for proper aiming. LIGHT SOURCES - Metal Halide PAR lamp. BALLASTS - High -power factor type HX -HPF ballast is designed for -20 degree F operation. Electrical components are serviceable from below. FINISH - Standard colors are white or bronze powder coat finish. Each fixture is finished with LSI's DuraGrIpe polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling, and is guaranteed for five full years. WARRANTY - The Encore carries a comprehensive 5 -year warranty on all parts, finish, workmanship and electrical components (excluding lamp). PHOTOMETRICS - For detailed photometric data, contact LSI Petroleum Lighting Sales. DISTANCE FROM I- PUMP CENTER CANOPY HEIGHT A N r TYP. i PUMP HEIGHT 4' TYP. 1 LAMP LAYOUT FOR 25° FLOOD A VERTICAL HEIOHT OF CANOPY B HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM CENTER OF DISPENSER TO CENTER OF FIXTURE 4' 8' 5' 4' 8' 6' 8' T 4' 8' 8' 8- 9' 4' 10' 18' -6 -6 -6 N N N N I +8 +6 1512' -6 -6 N N N N +8 +8 15' -6 -6 N N N N +6 +a 14 1I -6 -6 N N N +6 +6 14' -6 -6 N N N +6 +6 02004 LS1 INDUSTRIES INC. C�Jt US LISTED wet location 11 Shown with Optional Internal Louver Protected by the following patents: D482,480 5,662,407 6,059,422 6,224,233 Patentado 199,294 CA2276077 CA2381049 and Pat Pend. DIMENSIONS 11 -9/16" 15 -3/4' - 12' 12" j/ 1.1/2" 7-3/16" 15 -1n" Deck requires 12' opening_ with 2' radius corners. ` NOTE: Encore cannot be mounted In a single skin canopy with 12' deck pans. RECE 'ED FEB 0.9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Project Name 1 Fixture Type T Catalog # 1 ENCORE® FOCUS - DOUBLE OR SINGLE DECK APPLICATIONS LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION Luminaire Prefix Distribution Lamp Wattage Light Source Lens Line Luminaire Voltage Finish EC SP Spot 100 P38MH - PAR 38 Metal Halide 100 Watt FO - Focus MT - Mufti -Tap1 TT- TrI -Ta 220v - 5Q WHT - White BRZ - Bronze EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER J EC SP 100 P38MH FO MT WHT FOOTNOTES: 1- MT— Multi Tap Is sit pped standard unless otherwise specified. Mutt) Tap consists of 120V, 208V, 240V, and 277V. Multi Tap Is pre -wired for 277V. Alternate voltages will require field re- wiring. 2- TrI -Tap Is shipped standard for C -UL application. Trl -Tap consists of 120V, 277V, and 347V. Tri -Tap Is pre -wired for 347V. Alternate voltages will require field re- wiring. ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number TCKEC - Thin Canopy Kit for Encore 176008 DOM - DOUBLE DECK MOUNTING BRACKET (ORDER NUMBER 174806) UPTuR FLANGEED (8 wiRE HOLES ROOF UPTURNED FLANGE OF MOUNT BRACKET CEILING MOUNT BRACKET 174806 DDM - For use in covered areas (i.e. water proof plenum) where ceiling material will not support the fixture or access Is not available from above to utilize standard locking ring. Options IL - Internal Louver SDRP - SINGLE DECK RETROFIT PANEL (ORDER NUMBER 180292) CANOPY DECK RED GASKET BETWEEN PANEL AND DECK DECORATIVE PANEL 160292 SDRP - Single deck decorative retrofit panel facilitates conversions from 2x2 surface mounted fixture to Encore. DDRMP - DOUBLE DECK RETROFIT MOUNTING PANEL (ORDER NUMBER 177875) ROOF DECORATIVE PANEL 177825 DDRMP - Decorative retrofit panel Is for use on double deck canopies only. Panel will structurally support the Encore while covering an opening up to 600mm by 600mm. For use in covered areas only (Le water proof plenum). RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Project Name 1 Fixture Type Catalog it ® 2004 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. 'S° 15 Petroleum lighting "' • • • LEGEND d.... WNW • D• NMI Wan •..... Emma OEM1gN �.... arOwR neE .. mows ,w two dawas wlbt • ▪ WIN WOMB wean ®ran sown mewed MOWN WOW NOM WNW MON 30 0 30 05 5 SCALE W zov ra. THE PROPERTY E 201E0 G1434l IMMO ( d ) 9e7B/G!S'• FROND 30 FRONT =ECM 40 REAR 30 90C 10 PR.LLfdUN ?RY PL4T OF ffOLIf24Y STATION STORE'S 7509 LAKE DRIVE, CITY OF LINO LAKES, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, 55014 P.I.N. 17- 31 -22 -24 -002 pY \ 35W / /; / j" % / /' i / SOME IINFOr1711. WI al // '�� 1 Q .1 tAists / f; A! 4 / rD • / Wes' a � I 0? MN 10.2.000? 00M11W/ OR 474055 35 9 OZ IE0Mar ,/ J, BINCEMIGUir TOP SNRM'! RANH= 30. 4011HFASf OF WESTERLY PROPERTY CORNER arr. - 90004 1dwa Luc wE 34019 MCC LIFE 01110129 101 0n5 wgmwuE 0310173 de1Mr wend 0047113 51016 !ERR MOs REPROOF LEE DOMES W 2810175 DLWf Dd 0111016 R203OnN DEWED IRIIPAD 00013 IIEEaE wenn we. Icon Leal/ L76.S>;R/PrlCW.- • em Pal at me Ear NM of 0* Nagwr outdo. (E 1/2 of NW 1/4) r Realign So.mdd (17), Tweeld 1NeRa -ono cm) Macon. R.Ip T•a0N-td. (22) Wad Aada lady. * 04 0 bear a. Iad0. O...r. (1 1/2 r 0r peed r Wa aal. r Sr Sad M o m Far a d N.Sd1 oYtY (E 1/2 r NW 1/4) with Ur Reelllly d1R -al-ad M of Trunk Moil a N4 5 do now Wldek game an an arm* be*. of Nag fiwly -far tlqn.. nor,* added (24 Awe 55 mould) Ear along said W1555. Lead M • Wend r w da4wd w ha da! RRF -IF- cod 014 le fwd (119A) to M. Poet r R.O4N4. Ranee wooded, ward toddy-boy deonwe OIf-ak mends (24 lyre 30 nrww) Eat along veld M • M M. .co e, a to , d R far hd.! *3010 (490) Ad Ow Swan* M1011-4M1011M1011-44-ad -- r e 00o.1* romp r Teen 1 4 .ri Nor. 35d Wane* Nod S wd, -11. dews nor few me... (53 bp.o a mends) M rug W Seds3' 6019-rye, 401. M and 1019-onw 4adndr (331) fwd to par • Nga.Or Rem lo Ole WO donee -0.5. ate aaN dna d the et9Nt -/-war M 50 • • cod. r taw Nedad rive -7-00 5 Farb -three 0drmM0 (401' At 41 0 4000 r *Pew brow tarty-de mend•. se Wow vedtls (l5 *wow 41 wane OR wars), on we Dowd • w Nudsl Nob* and 1444-0.0 bald. 04 (1537) hot A pat r tdw54 Odor Sad owrnlp-014 'O .4 fared 55*4- Oda e evade (73 dared 14 0404 31 vepdd) M Wong odd tech* N0M -r +O M. do. hndd 11119-few ore I thirty-We 4 *4 At (33432) e a pad r t with 0 wve tar it elb alms Smlo6 .04 deg MO wow 4 the 05t -ray M a nerve r sod 41... eN-r a. rdy-ma hadoar (59301) o amid veld. ✓ emb'two Awe, eM� -all ne0 04 t 1110.-rle wad& (22 bweee 21 ninths 50 odd ds). w .4 en4th r I4ve 4wdoN thIF4 -Woo .d rn4-dw 4304403 (]7011) M e per of fawner er 004 pat a Da peel r Meoeaoda7 rah • M tog Ldp Nag owwy -ego .. 0. 50,4 .401 ado...055 media rn dewed 35 0403 30 wade) M Lan Ow Pea* r andodly there 3a091 bawd -WSW dewed. Siy- *..dada ddb adwnr (75 &gym 35 04 S. 30 swab) Far. W hallo! 1401, -ee end e4 wile (0520* Ada 4e Part r 4pinnag. 1 1w sal 155 M • the Nee 153 fed r the Ear I/O • t0* N 0.. 1. 1/4 r Sw .0404 1/4 af 04 Satlw.t 1/4 • Seam 15. To*, 117 North, Ronge 22 M al ▪ lnowe ro4 lo the UMW Slabs Gwdwwl Sand thong. 4A TIE PROPERTY MOWS 105271 SOAK FEET OR 3.75 AGES FLOOD SOAar By wed* Wawelrha toy. ma wePwdl M In LM O (M 0l05• at 130 ,e• bed) pr *dens Feed Ydaew Nora Nth Gewuaa purr 11. 2700015 3010 5. Sea wile Mop him on 010011.e ddb r ley 17. 1552. Wo Dad ..0 l5 pH0Idd • ••••• e• so. Ili ww♦ ,tea wive sw 105.. • odds s LA..*0 - Red Gana M.N. IN NNW news o Mad• Yet Oa ...WNW odds also a.Ip0 • 008 WON In IN NW MN In =Ms or •wablwt 11. row, Mow 4100 not wmll7 Olt IN *- - made owl w In the add told laersk MwR he ads way At ewe w 8610 d aneweee s prods hw eam.wRaa «are. le nod, 1w we Odd* Word wed.* 4054* LOT JACO, HOE 1■05744 SOAK FEEL OR 213 RCREL LOT 243f4441 SQUARE FEET. OR 1.37 AGES MR OF Nww12375 MUM FEET. OR 31 PORES Ce r71607CSrmA% 1 IEMI MOW 11040 1103 MAEY WO PIE7a1EU BY NE OR MO TNT 1 AM A DULY 20505 LMO SGOEYOR ORM 117 SNMED 115 15N K JANUARY. 2007. 0F1a0 r HONER YISE7001 210(277 M. 22440 FOR 05/24044 REVISED 2 -1-07: NOM MOTOR LOT UNE a5*. 04+r 04 *40. 04y�w .04 Soodon 4444 257. 010 Carver. Enwsa s Snowed 7 i U01FR w DIRECT «05004* lM5 00 TIE STAE K YMIE40TA ji saSY 5 7..? 34 *4 �\ /rte NO1E : M owed w ponfaw.0 ardor mw al Wen0e1 de• hi ww.ar maw m Sword. gal 40 Add 4ea..a.L w Wows. / N p \ \ Avi'ritqr BDMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS k SURVEYORS A4t5WM 0101 OBE. SURE 200. ROAN. RN 55122 (051) 250 -0101 ,M1045. ROAD, SLOE 112. LEEIOOE W 8014 n31) 744 -4370 FILE COPY RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES an SOIL SITE C •• LAII331 OM MILL FJp o/!✓N/1YdGfP Leal/ L76.S>;R/PrlCW.- • em Pal at me Ear NM of 0* Nagwr outdo. (E 1/2 of NW 1/4) r Realign So.mdd (17), Tweeld 1NeRa -ono cm) Macon. R.Ip T•a0N-td. (22) Wad Aada lady. * 04 0 bear a. Iad0. O...r. (1 1/2 r 0r peed r Wa aal. r Sr Sad M o m Far a d N.Sd1 oYtY (E 1/2 r NW 1/4) with Ur Reelllly d1R -al-ad M of Trunk Moil a N4 5 do now Wldek game an an arm* be*. of Nag fiwly -far tlqn.. nor,* added (24 Awe 55 mould) Ear along said W1555. Lead M • Wend r w da4wd w ha da! RRF -IF- cod 014 le fwd (119A) to M. Poet r R.O4N4. Ranee wooded, ward toddy-boy deonwe OIf-ak mends (24 lyre 30 nrww) Eat along veld M • M M. .co e, a to , d R far hd.! *3010 (490) Ad Ow Swan* M1011-4M1011M1011-44-ad -- r e 00o.1* romp r Teen 1 4 .ri Nor. 35d Wane* Nod S wd, -11. dews nor few me... (53 bp.o a mends) M rug W Seds3' 6019-rye, 401. M and 1019-onw 4adndr (331) fwd to par • Nga.Or Rem lo Ole WO donee -0.5. ate aaN dna d the et9Nt -/-war M 50 • • cod. r taw Nedad rive -7-00 5 Farb -three 0drmM0 (401' At 41 0 4000 r *Pew brow tarty-de mend•. se Wow vedtls (l5 *wow 41 wane OR wars), on we Dowd • w Nudsl Nob* and 1444-0.0 bald. 04 (1537) hot A pat r tdw54 Odor Sad owrnlp-014 'O .4 fared 55*4- Oda e evade (73 dared 14 0404 31 vepdd) M Wong odd tech* N0M -r +O M. do. hndd 11119-few ore I thirty-We 4 *4 At (33432) e a pad r t with 0 wve tar it elb alms Smlo6 .04 deg MO wow 4 the 05t -ray M a nerve r sod 41... eN-r a. rdy-ma hadoar (59301) o amid veld. ✓ emb'two Awe, eM� -all ne0 04 t 1110.-rle wad& (22 bweee 21 ninths 50 odd ds). w .4 en4th r I4ve 4wdoN thIF4 -Woo .d rn4-dw 4304403 (]7011) M e per of fawner er 004 pat a Da peel r Meoeaoda7 rah • M tog Ldp Nag owwy -ego .. 0. 50,4 .401 ado...055 media rn dewed 35 0403 30 wade) M Lan Ow Pea* r andodly there 3a091 bawd -WSW dewed. Siy- *..dada ddb adwnr (75 &gym 35 04 S. 30 swab) Far. W hallo! 1401, -ee end e4 wile (0520* Ada 4e Part r 4pinnag. 1 1w sal 155 M • the Nee 153 fed r the Ear I/O • t0* N 0.. 1. 1/4 r Sw .0404 1/4 af 04 Satlw.t 1/4 • Seam 15. To*, 117 North, Ronge 22 M al ▪ lnowe ro4 lo the UMW Slabs Gwdwwl Sand thong. 4A TIE PROPERTY MOWS 105271 SOAK FEET OR 3.75 AGES FLOOD SOAar By wed* Wawelrha toy. ma wePwdl M In LM O (M 0l05• at 130 ,e• bed) pr *dens Feed Ydaew Nora Nth Gewuaa purr 11. 2700015 3010 5. Sea wile Mop him on 010011.e ddb r ley 17. 1552. Wo Dad ..0 l5 pH0Idd • ••••• e• so. Ili ww♦ ,tea wive sw 105.. • odds s LA..*0 - Red Gana M.N. IN NNW news o Mad• Yet Oa ...WNW odds also a.Ip0 • 008 WON In IN NW MN In =Ms or •wablwt 11. row, Mow 4100 not wmll7 Olt IN *- - made owl w In the add told laersk MwR he ads way At ewe w 8610 d aneweee s prods hw eam.wRaa «are. le nod, 1w we Odd* Word wed.* 4054* LOT JACO, HOE 1■05744 SOAK FEEL OR 213 RCREL LOT 243f4441 SQUARE FEET. OR 1.37 AGES MR OF Nww12375 MUM FEET. OR 31 PORES Ce r71607CSrmA% 1 IEMI MOW 11040 1103 MAEY WO PIE7a1EU BY NE OR MO TNT 1 AM A DULY 20505 LMO SGOEYOR ORM 117 SNMED 115 15N K JANUARY. 2007. 0F1a0 r HONER YISE7001 210(277 M. 22440 FOR 05/24044 REVISED 2 -1-07: NOM MOTOR LOT UNE a5*. 04+r 04 *40. 04y�w .04 Soodon 4444 257. 010 Carver. Enwsa s Snowed 7 i U01FR w DIRECT «05004* lM5 00 TIE STAE K YMIE40TA ji saSY 5 7..? 34 *4 �\ /rte NO1E : M owed w ponfaw.0 ardor mw al Wen0e1 de• hi ww.ar maw m Sword. gal 40 Add 4ea..a.L w Wows. / N p \ \ Avi'ritqr BDMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS k SURVEYORS A4t5WM 0101 OBE. SURE 200. ROAN. RN 55122 (051) 250 -0101 ,M1045. ROAD, SLOE 112. LEEIOOE W 8014 n31) 744 -4370 FILE COPY RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • 80 D`IS y ,y 1?;' .09 EXISTING HWT 5 TO R!N018. a ?G } NODIRG0 APPROI't F RIGHT IN ONLT. 1 rarer TO NN00T• ROWNGRGD DRAWINGS FOR CONFIGURATION. 50- / J (Of' , J 1 I 1' / TO BE COMPLETED. PROVIDE' DISPENSERS PER OWNER. RGi7RIP! STALL LI▪ MES .da 01 RELOCATE PROPANE TANK nor or SITOMIryOUS. SAW OJT AND remove TO BLEND INTO PEW •AD IMPROVEMENTS ANEW CURS ANO' stirrer MATCH W NEW ,..__.. S[1UM18000 DRIVE -.WITH ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLANS. .INSTALL NE▪ W SIT PAWN? d 0 w g� 1 x"1 NEW CITY STREET. REFER TO ENGINEERED PLANS BY SEN, INC. F ALIGNMENT AND DETAILS. 1,r EXI0TWG N APPROACH TO BE REMOVED. SAW CIT AND 0 REMOVE PA,1 Q3✓ Q 0_ I = I � I }N Z N O T H OCALE° 30. 0 0 FILE COPY RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES JA_ INSITES 10" liarbor Lane Nor.. Suit• """;=.7::: ' 1 W a CC O coo. 1 cn m z Ow I— a Ne Q J O r- n J ALL OOCST1O2* RELATED TD 500040 AMO CONSTRUCTION or TIN PROJECT SHALL SE DEECI20 TO NOWAY COWAN!, PROJECT MANAGER M0WM Per• •IWEr l8L1, RN. 5 PAX IPMY 0010* opef piss; cication, that p woo proporod by me or under m diraq Pup. Mon, and Mot 1 • ly I,0.nnssd Landscape Architset the e laws of the State of Minnee0ata. Date - No 19500 5.a Robert J. Moolle N O. DATE REVISION D00CRITOM 1 1Af1007CTY REVIEW COWIE DATE OIn207 PROL N0. 1007 Of S • • • CONTRACTOR NOTE; CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS. NOTIFY OWNER OF DISCREPANCIES, MATCH IN CURB. GUTTER AND PAVEMENTS TO EXISTING CONDITIONS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE CITY WITH PHASED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS AS NEEDED FOR ALL UTILITY. DRIVEWAY. AND SIDEWALK INSTALLATION AND ALL R/W RESTORATION, SITE PLAN LAYOUT NOTES SITE PLAN PREPARED FROM BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY BY BDM CONSULTING [WINGERS AND SURVEYORS 651-266-0101 DATED 20 FEB 2000 REFER TO ALTA SURVEY FOR ADDITIONAL EXISTOG TIRE INFORMATION CURBS ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OP CURS BUILDING, PIMP ISLAND COMPLEX AND CANOPY ARE LOCATED PROM THE SOUTHEASTERN MOST PROPERTY CORNER AND ALIGNED PARALLEL AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINE UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THIS DRAWING, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS, CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, AND EXPANSION JOINTS IN SLAB ON GRADE, SIDEWALKS, ARO DRIVES CONTROL JOINT MAXIMUM DISTANCE WALKS- 0 0.C, ALL OTHERS- 10 O.E. SAW CUT CONTROL JOINTS MIN. ONE- QUARTER CONCRETE THICKNESS. EXPANSION JOINT MAXIMUM DISTANCE: WALKS 20 O.C, ALL OTHER- 40 0L. DOWEL ALL EXPANSION JOINTS MAXIMUM 24' 0.C. CONCRETE 1N ALL DRIVE AREAS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OP IT DEPTH WITH COMPACTED CRUSHED ROCK BASE BELOW. REINFORCE AS NEEDED WITH 6•x01 WELDED WIRE MESH AND/ OR N 801990RC9NG BARS A MINIMUM OP 11P OC. (VERIFY W/ SOILS REPORI1 CAULK AU. CONTROL, CONSTRUCTION AN0 EXPANSION JOINTS IN CONCRETE AT DRIVE AREAS, TANK AREA, DISPENSER ISLAND COMPLEX AND CAR WASH SLAB. CAULK AROUND ISLAND FORTIS AND CANOPY COLUMN& ALL WORK IN THE 80.W., APPROACHES AND REPLACEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, ETC TO BE INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARD DETAILS ANO SPECIPICATIONS UTILLI WORK EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS ZONING DISTRICT: TOTAL SITE AREA EX. HARDCOVER PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS GB GENERAL BUSINESS 166,171 SP 9AV TAKING: 13515 5F HOLIDAY STATIONSTOIIG 02,679 SF PROPOSED RETAIL 50,557 5F BUILDING SETBACKS PROM STREET 50 REAR YARD 50' SIDE TARO 10 80 565 365 PARKING SETBACKS PROM STREET 10 REAR YARD 10' SIDE YARD 10' HOLIDAY LOT PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED GREEN AREA 40,700 91 PROPOSED HARD COVETS 51,678 5P PAVED AREA 46,496 SP BUILDING AREA 6543 5P C -STORE • CAR WASH • 445 565 505 az PARKING REQUIREMENTS PARKING REQUIRED 1/200 SP FA. 15 STALLS PARKING PROVIDED 26 STALLS, 12 SRVPNI'B. RETAIL LOT PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED GREEN AREA: 50659 SP PROPOSED HARD COVER 29549 SP PAVED AREA 12,441 SP 8UILD1N9 AREA 6500 SP PARKING REQUIREMENTS PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED 515 405 505 1/200 Sr PA4 20 STALLS 52 STALLS y1 p1Y No" 5.7 • 0�1rj pySl� `3' / /. / ,./ / • \\ / vV / A, / \ // \\>,/, / � \ ,.... //\ // R,Lr \ •\ / / N u N 6G■OLNV -7- 3a' r W 911[ PLAN KEYNOTES 1 LANDSCAPE / GREEN AREA REFER TO SHEET L1 FOR MORE INFORMATION. 1 PARKING SPACES. PAINT STALL LINES 4' WIDE, HIGH V191DIL11T, WHITE SPACES PROVIDED: 021 SERVICE POINTS 1261 9 '-A'4 20-0• GENERAL SPACES 1121 0-04. 20'-04 ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACE 01 9'-01/4 20'-0° LOADING SPACE 5 ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACE WITH LOADING ZONE. PRO1DE APPROPRIATE STORAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS. 4 PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STRIPING AND/ OR TEXT. PAINT WITH 4' WIDE, HIGH VISIBILITY, WHITE, PAINT. 5 BITUMINOUS PAVING. SEE DETAIL 9 /592 STANDARD PAVEMENT SECTION /VERIFY WITH GEO TEM 9ECOMMEN2ATI0211 1• WEAR COURSE T DARE COURSE MN/ IP CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SASE 6 8' WIDE, 6° DEPTH COLORED CONCRETE APRON WITH 0x6•, 10 GAUGE WELDED MR! MESH. PIGMENT TO BE INTERORATED INTO CONCRETE MIX PRIOR TO BEING PLACED. COLOR: BLACK TO MATCH ASPHALT 7 6' DEPTH CONCRETE sue ON GRADE WITH 6416•, 10 GAUGE WELDED WIRE MESH 6 6' INTEGRAL CONCRETE CURS/ WALK. SEE DETAIL 10/992 PROVIDE HANDICAP ACCESS RAMP. 9 INTERNAL TRASH ROOM PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 10 OD 19 HT. SITE AREA LIGHT PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR ITYPI. CONCRETE FOOTING PER DETAIL 0 /592. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS. B CONCRETE PILLED PPE BOLLARD. PER ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS. A POST/ DOLLARD MOUNTED AOA 'DISABILITY PARKING ONLY' SIGN & POST/ DOLLARD MOUNTED 'NO PARKING SIGN 12 POST MOUNTED TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL SIGNA9E 5IM. TO DETAIL 5/992. (PROVIDE BY 5.C1 A STOP SIGN PROVIDE 'STOP DAR PAVEMENT MARKINGS PER CITY SPEC. 5 'ONE WAY', 'DO NOT ENTER' SIGN 13 HOLIDAY TRADEMARK SIGN PER SIGN PACKAGE. SIGN BT HOLIDAY COMPANIES. FOUNDATION AND SASE 51 G.G A RELOCATED PYLON SIGN 5 EXISTING HIGHWAY 6109 14 FLAG POLE W/ 4' THICK CONC. SLAB. GONG FTC. PER DTL 12/392 P ROVIDE SPOT LIGHT FROM TRADEMARK 31011 15 56-16 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER DETAIL 11/991. '7 50'Ok 164,0T ISLAND COMPLEX CANOPY 14120 S0. FT/ VERIFY COLUMN AND 70011N3 SIZE WITH CANOPY PLANS. CANOPY GRAPHICS PER OWNER A IN 4-0'x 10'-7 SS ISLAND POOPS (PROVIDED BY PETROLEUM CONTRACTOR/ CONCRETE F11.1. BY 0E. & E66 FUEL 0/SPENSER PER OWNER G FUEL 015PEN8[R PER OWNER D. DIESEL DISPENSER PER OWNER E. SERVICE CENTER PER OWNER, INSTALLED BY 0.0 16 TREE A18 HOSE BID WITH SIGNACE PER OWNER 19 3( UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS PER OWNER PROVIDE VENT STAND WITH CONCRETE SLAB. D15TALL 7 CONCRETE PILLED PIPE BOLLARDS. (PAINT 9911 - DARK BRONZE/ 20 ELECTRICAL TRAN090RMER PER MECHANICAL PLAN5. O.C. TO PROVIDE 4' DEPTH (MINI CONCRETE PAD. 11 STORM SEWER STRUCTURE A. CURB INLET CATCH BASIN, PRONE AND GRATE PER DETAIL 4 /992 B . TRENCH DRAIN PER DETAIL 2/092 G MANHOLE, FRAME AND VENTED COVER PER DETAIL D. CONCRETE APRON W/ RIP RAP SPILLWAY PER DETAIL 21 SITE DIRECTIONAL STORAGE. 'CAR WASH SIGN WITH ARROW PER SIGN PACKAGE 23 OVERHEAD CAR WASH CLEARANCE DAR PER DETAIL 7/0P1. MDT GENERAL CONTRACTOR/ 24 61 DEPTH CONCRETE SLAB WITH HEAT MAT PER ELECTRICAL PANS. 23 to AUTO VACUUM 0.C. TO PROVIDE 4' DEPTN CONCRETE PAD, PLACED FLUSH WITH SACK OF CURB. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. PROTECT WITH S• PIPE BOLLARD 0 9E00, AT FRONT CORNER, PAINT DARK BRONZE/ BRASH CONTAINER BY HOLIDAY C01 26 DIKE RACK 17 4"6' PVC SLEEVE LOUDER PAVEMENT AREAS FOR IRRIGATION L1NE3. VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATIONS WITH IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 26 0-PIPE BOLLARD PER DETAIL 5/992 29 4' DEPTH CONCRETE STOOP/ WALK 50 EXTERIOR PAYPNONE W/ V DEPTH CONCRETE PAD MUSH WITH BACK -OP -CURB. PROTECT WITH 6° PIPE BOLLARD G REVD, AT FRONT CORNERS, PAINT DARK BRONZE/ SEE DETAIL 6/392 31 CONCRETE CURB 15L5N0 M 8' DEPTH CONCRETE APPROACH PER DETAIL 1/SP2. 33 CAR WASH CONTROLLER/ KEYPAD PER MANUFACTURERS SPECS. PROVIDE TRASH CONTAINER WITH EXTERIOR HOOD 34 CAR WASH 'COUNT -DOWN DRYER TIMER' PER CAR WASH MANUFACTURER RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES INSITES .7. A ANVIVOILLMSCAPR 6.51051,521015E5 3025 hne 184 Lane Lei 5aax x Tev TU.uoo Holiday 1- 0 V/ W Z 2 LINO LAKES ALL 01RST10N6 MATED TO 500199 AND WNB101071011 OP l6 PROJECT SHALL 6E DDRCTED TO HOLIDAY COS0001 PROJECT VOL01 R 017 1151 1011 OMEN 11ONOO65 w WA NO 00— Pee INN ao-.N I hereby certify Sat this plan, specification, or report was P m pares by e under my Greet supervision, and that I am a duly licensed Landscape under und the laws or the Stale of M,nnesota. Date R No. 10306 Signed Robert J. Mueller NO. DAME RVOWII @601•71041 1 2/6/5000771 RBVRW 061510 COP1IONrt NN - 1RRM RATE PLOSION OAR 01/52/67 760J. MD. 200 OI • DEPResS CURB POR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS/Pi 9) DEPTH CONCRETE APPROACH WITH 8'X9) 10 GAUGE WIRE MESH PAN51oN J0 SAW -CUT P MIN DEPTH CONTROL JOINTS BEE PLAN POR SPECIPIC RADIUS DIMENSION AND LAYOUT CONCRETE APPROACH DETAIL SP2 NOT TO SCALE 05CT10N A -A SfilgIGRADe PLC TINE ME 1 ---A RENDS T DA ITYN R.I•.Y.MM•1®53=. DISCHARGE PIPE TO CATCIWO COMPARED DARN W1LRIAL snit .. COMPACTED ID5GRAO! IT1'PI OSKTION 9-9 N0T6 TRENCH CASTING! PER SPECIFICATIONS 2 TRENCH DRAIN DETAIL SP2 SCALE - 1/4 " -1' -0" PLAN 1 9) DIA. U-012X PIPE GUARD W/ CONCRETE PDOTNS 2 C00c0ETE ISLAND 3 NTE!L CURB FORM 4 EXPAN510N JOINT B COMMIE DRIVE B CANOPY COUSIN WO BRICK EMCLOSL E 7 CANOPY PORTING SECTION A -A SECTION B -B 3 PIPE GUARD AT ISLAND SP2 SCALE - 1/4"-1' -0" MYNAH 9-00070 MOUNT ES 2.0011 CURS INLET PRASE A 014TE TOP CASON.- SE! PLAN MIN. 2 CONC. ADJUSTL1e MANHOLE COVER TO BE w DNA CR*TEX TYPE 1 ION APPROVED *YIIALJ M IRCTANOAAR OPIMNE CONCRETE CATCH SAME MANHOLE • RAMC TO BE CRETIN TT* 4S1.12 ION APPROVED EQUAL! GEM Ewe ow OUT LONIIOM - 0 GIL 4W I Illlu III - 411119• 2/F SIAM CRWHED ROCK CRDISTIIS0ID BIA4O4GE "II a ®II -11 YI 1 I' 4 CATCH BASIN DETAIL SP2 NOT TO SCALE n 1 1 II, N BREAK -AWAY BOLT PINIONED GRADE B OTTOM OF 1• SIGN POST I TNAPFic SIGN VASES Bee SITS PLAN POE MESEIAGE 5QT4/49' PITLR OF Stem 49) ASCVE MAPAR 2. 80UAI! WREAK/MAT D ISEASE STANDARD 1 VTA19) STIFFENER SLEEVE set 2. ABOVE GRADE TO IS• BELOW GRADE 501.T BTIPPENER BLELVe To 2 1/4•12• /DOLOR INTENSION 5 TRAFFIC SIGN AND SLEEVE DETAIL SP2 NOT TO SCALE PLAN VIEW 4 THICK CONC. SLAB 1K• !AL/LTD 51 0000E CO. PAT PHONE BABE BY PHONE CO. CONCRETE FILLED PIPE 50LLARD PAINTED PS BRONZE TONE ONE PAD ?UAW W/ TOP OP CURS CURD A GUTTER 1/P PVC CONDUITS ARE TO RUN PROM PHONE PAD TO ELEC. PHONE ROOM. PROM cries TO SNISACTCR L INSTALL ALL I/2• PVC =WITS 2. PLOCESGLL OperNACTOR IS TO NULL AND HODS UP ALL B.GRRILLL WINES PCR TO INSTALLATION OP TAI! PAT MMES. 6 PAY PHONE DETAIL SP2 SCALE - LIGHT BROOM PDUBH -�+a PA= or CURB e PLAN INTS C OR LOCAnDNB :.39 scow DeTTM". Te sL Io wM E��M Aril �°LLT.. rAgTC e.rr.1 ra tct�yAH"rc 'sk «� A I. -- CONTRAC7w TO Hem CLEARANCE Hrs. so CAR WASH 9WND! P M NT' P T1TI M. AMC RAIZ TONANCS Y III Bu 3/40 DEEP CONTROL JOINTS 8ee PLAN FOR LOCATION PONCE NONA AT DAN or POLL YOM- '. SAN PLATS Sums Nova. PAPA w �, •A - - JOST Paradox.. SIP 10 INTEGRAL CURB /WALK SP2 PLAN NOTE CLEARANCE BAN AND Remo SIBNAGE BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR 18 6 7 OVERHEAD CLEARANCE BAR SP2 SCALE - 1/4-0 -0• qq µ lit • COMPACTED BABE MATERIAL COMPACTED BUBGRADE I15s - TIT GUTTER W/3,•( PAVEMENT GRADE $6 -18 CURB ilia! J'' DETAIL o a 11 jj SP2 LOUT PO! ...VA EDGE ITTPI (REMOVE AFTER CONCERT! C�TLS H. OS MBAR PS MA TIER L•V!L T M GC Fink , '�I"` i -- PIP! Viir rouboA"ION PLAN NOTES: FLAGPOLE z e ALUM. PLASH COLLAR - ( CONCRETE SLAB ---1:,' ` ` t SAG! PLATE I4NBTNATION MAT CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. DO NOT USE FOR GETTING ANCHOR GO-TS. 5*00T AREA LENT MANUPACTURER F PLATE OR NAG! TEMPLATE. ANCHOR SOLT G@ AND 4 t...j::�':_, ", SECTION STEEL BASE PLATE 8 ROUND AREALIGHT FOUNDATION 5P2 SCALE - 1/2••1001, 12 4 MIN CURB AND SUTTER (TTPJ ToPBDD ■III■ Aim scALe - 1/2"-1-0• MIMI Ilii 1 5!L!R GRANT V. GRAS! DIMS & OUTTEN SECTION move SHALL NAVE AGGREGATE BABE PAVING SECTION 7.50, FLEXIBLE DESIGN SHALL INDEPENDENT TACK COAT SHALL CONCRETE GUTTER PAVING SHALL I8 THE A MINIMUM SHALL PAVEMENT Be BASED TESTING COMPANY. BE PLACED SHALL 50 CLEANED MINIMUM 4 BITUMINOUS 50 7 seems. ON Be PRIOR 114ICKNESS TON SOIL SeTWEEN TACKED P 323So 1LVVIl54 PS 54.22 WEARING COORS! TACN COAT P 023110 NVNWA2 PG 54-23 BRUL010U5 GAS! • CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE Dow CIRWHED LIMESTONPJ D BUBORADE 1NCLU090 TINT ROLLING AND 0UBSRAOG PREPAAATIGN REQUIRED FOR PAVING. ALL PAVING PAVEMENT SECTION AND 10. CLASS 5 DESIGN PER MNOOT ROAD DE*ION MANUAL BORINGS R-VALUE DETERMINED BY AN BITUMINOUS LIFTS. THE FACE OF THE PRIOR TO EACH BITUMINOUS LIFT. THE TO PLACDD THE TACK COAT. 9 PAVING SECTION SP2 NOT TO SCALE LIGHT BROOM PDUBH -�+a PA= or CURB e PLAN INTS C OR LOCAnDNB tct�yAH"rc 'sk «� PLAN VIEW -' PAVING. (See KEYNOTES AND/OR SPECS POR REQUIREMENT81 INTEGRAL CURB/WALK III Bu 3/40 DEEP CONTROL JOINTS 8ee PLAN FOR LOCATION w •MPACTED CRUSHED ROCK BASE COMPACTED BUD -GRADE 10 INTEGRAL CURB /WALK SP2 SCALE - 1/2- .1' -0• 18 6 � • BACK r CURS . . PAVING . _ � R qq µ lit • COMPACTED BABE MATERIAL COMPACTED BUBGRADE I15s - TIT GUTTER W/3,•( PAVEMENT GRADE $6 -18 CURB ilia! J'' DETAIL 11 CURB ANO GUTTER DETAILS SP2 SCALE - 3/4" -11-OP FLAGPOLE z e ALUM. PLASH COLLAR - CONCRETE SLAB ---1:,' ` ', - HARDY/00D WEDGeS�',., a POUNOATION SLEEVE ' 4 t...j::�':_, ", TAT SAND TIGHTLY TAMPED APTER ALIGNING POLE STEEL BASE PLATE STEEL SUPPORT PLATE AND GROUND SPIKE 2 n 12 FLAGPOLE FOUNDATION SP2 scALe - 1/2"-1-0• RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES INSITES 10, Harbor ',Ile W a CC p O u, w 2 z O Y a 0 ALL OIY0TIDNS INLAID TO NDDOG AID LLNQTWCHON OF THIS PROJECT SHALL O! DYPJYTED TO HOLIDAY COIPANTR PROJECT MANAGES OAT WEST ROW MEET MAMMA W OUST MOMS GMe 0215 FAA bee OOILTA N0. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 1 2N1007CITT REVIEW COW!Nl DOPTnGNT NOON Imnr• AITe N■•■ DATE 0110/0? P944 N0. 2007 O FILE core • CEMEPAL: 7 Mar ar M - •00001 ere Amer b s ___ earl r Malt- Ara.* (MK Cam. 5110 r - 551. AIM r 1 a ra - 1MMmb. MP MOMS wary b. 55.1) rear: m s nap war r Mar Me M CM Ems 1510142). Snout aMrMl sawn .0022 oar r ,5_- Ma May May M rme.- of r Tnde M. re b Ma say ssv✓pb r ap woos sea.g r omen wa r mama. MM.- 2. Wang a.,E.y, Isrwn talon.. 5400 ollIty Men.. Moo an M. Or b tern a 1Mtl m on by WY Mr 3. lards rr4y 0010 In aro or m as Cy a.m. a, adnnn waas a MV y 25022. b warn so w w'. y Mr morn. r rMRlm. Ma ma M ern MI mend. Mar to be Mare MM r Cy arMra. N . 10002105122. rat M.rabn boa WM 0010 0010.00 Ma:.'neean.:wrywar® Mb>111.'° asnareren be mom Or rrne. mamas Me,rr 5 1.m..MLrrla + Orr. brarb. MrMn 5.er r a mabme. our M war r Mar . edam war the m001000 515 Ate PM.. 0051 Damr5 Wee 511010 115) M ir. Mrs .M Y�aa rS S. 105.10•.4 r M. Cy Ma Ors r..me Odom a rrW `+M ten, M - r 0010010. Ma *551 re Ma e. Pram Mmnn amerlaa b r WNW . anera 22 .MM r M.ar.mab r MUM • OR M MM. 0025000 P. Taabr r trwrts.' (amadra5M 7. Mannar bran WIS co* Maim at 5 P. r Mom S. mmm. MM.. .r r wan Ma 100.00 :_a. w M - dry as a mnna brim r Saab. 0010 Me Was r .con 5125 dm en Mb Sr as km led Mr.Mn 110 End. am r . yens Mir r arang Meer no rem m. 2 arm. war F r Metre Mammas M Mat. P le 110 5.5arer'a rmiremary b akin M real 005125 r a reel barbs tl .1 warp r e . O.rn e r a M. r 05100..,51} MSS t• E.51 r me Mara e. Carr rift rem ter Maim ed r Pia r Fran MOM a r e sr Pr M Mires t•• 5.2 5 OWE OM CALL r (Ml) WSW@ F M Mrmaab/•. f5. sae 5454 r mm3- 11Mamass.M.1.bb aOrr.rMOM inn. r e M bads heara M2(alt Prat �e tam) en M EM . 5 m..ra F arm 5110 Morro i r41�R Obtain Mai rperSrr r mba erne a 110s 1111 mar Myra. Mgr Data Or Or M a Ma waa Mat ass mwair ea red tam -15 1054 r i... 51 Mr .dab 5125 tramembs bear mar or Mar na b 1*. Inglis. of bM 151 ImMM. M r MIrM M .lawVSS almbb aka. 10 PMb M mg, tlrF orre r Mr. 210.0.51 1105151 et • lard* .000051r Tot... Mato mama ter r MSS art Me M.N. 5110 Mete Ntlr MM.M Sr.sb MtlrM l �rwa .,a,,,r. r era, •Orr MOM Orb. no M. as Wawa M. .bun war rM r Mob. ter ray mere ma mar r ^ya.Ym sr enM�r s Y alaeMb wars brr.4vM .r sa.. stl 12. *Mop la r a..rrb Moral m agora. Cams of PI mere M. 00100 .rbl Mr. r a raMMIe r aa•.ra b Mee. mar Mane r aaarte '5110 bum. CU. A 2).0010. 5.mr5rM dal r. r .10.51 r sorb am Me *Me anal ne55 55 Mar at .all area 0010 be *41.2* 12* M rho. Morn or rat Proa 5555 rM. S enrol met mm b me Mb wart n.Mr awsa P.M marls Mmlo al ivy molts at no M M the Ore. 5 am MI Man Pa la nor ter Manama a- Tar. .a sir r at urrslM.M br.MM Mrv. 002.0051 14. Mar to 00.O. a, tar bang r err Ma s 2001051. AMMO .r 22.11 warts more r sal ==ma s a m e ..e.rr. wan Mear2 .10rMSt r Mori (*1) mama. mar 151 inn ask wawa be e ma aima*. r 11. m151.o, 1' 15 McMa . araq. and a rremwa5a4 M.M. err AMA fl ow.. Co Mm oral* w. mom*. -r o mean.. amhad °1051 a map Miele Mr .Moor M M.a. w wamm ant 5.4-'00-0010. erns as mar 02.51 mbar. Morro Ponta. area. r 1 ..parr. a1M.Mam w. M oeminorr ray. do . M) PM r .Par me maw rya -6.. /. Par 5100 mm lsd to a. Myer . r MA. 11. Mtw .wan r rirp sear r PeOy, wawa boob a m5. •de M r Mr tR MO b M1 aaCMoo Ma 2e. Mxm bole mum. MrrM arm. - men. and are _ w. rM *.5555555 mornr s ware a Mru.l. P) mg war ram Oran . the pap* a P. MM Ma .MM*Mtall r or mars ram ra Me PM. ad MM MP r Ml .rte OIS lart. same MK - In Mar M 5154 as m hbF 006 - Mr ee morn tiro Moab. a< .Meal M apnea• Mr Mar Mre air.. e r .1.1051 Esra.rbarawa.mawsrMa W MPMr0.45441 .50 54r ,woad'.• 4 oiono te r PAM. Sr r •.M S..aa. 21. Ober moral Mm M Cry b PM F r 2*1 deItMyaY. W Wornet norm iaer. Mrt. M Marlin arWM. amMS •54 MOy BMW ,05100 51200 MM. m e m 2510. MIL r 2M1 5151 Sfe. a w Mr 545* t e.moor n bmm a mean) Mao 11.nr Poe., sr. Sharma Frew. 31 ere) ee tape to Yx 55)050 et .are. kabua F era a pro* ...memo polo. tar lmr.O !rota solem booboo Mori M. PNm Tap.. M Tad mbar, or appro.. era, with area cow a men E. _era rem MM Pmts Mar y Peas ••TER OIOTP10UT10• OVOTE.: 1 1110 awP/1 2 P . MM. armriM amen Marm n 10 ra�MMm ret Mom. r .Mr Mr w Muir n. e. • rarer .moron r °1O err a ea .r. M .r mem M mango L r *er arm TS Maim al1 arty era er 0. M mew a b Mr err F M25r5le Mar. erl rd. mar near Mom einem mar or *Mr Mgr to mann 5 OWIMire Mannar roplaNd er. . m re Mmgr a 510051.00 5151 1 a If ere ISM et s Mme 0000• SO* Maar M. NW.* ww mbar at O a en d a l Me 24 w /Mg 1. I I . . . m a r e rani balsa Mr 55 55 1 2 10 Ma mwrea.0 d�rprb F s P. Warm. a r barb.. misarra et air Mara rI M F rlrtMe54 MM m12, or warn ammenea Mar r s 4. WSW Paa.5 r and mrn.1. tealMelserd .M en a .ant - 0512 r wars• a the My rib Re MPrwa2 100y r Cy r MM 24 mks rap pre b m term Paws• r .Me.bw M WWM-W. (100-•D app pawn (251051 410001051 Pea wawa*NVy 251• a • 5 P.* b *0 ono le P!m +amts 151 • MrSur 002 Pe.. Mr11•r5 Ftlesae M miner M Parr pea• Man 100 4 err Par.• era wren r pm r aav�r Mt•'mar rpm 14 M(2 mO 5 Mt Oar 02 0.115 bun Pea (MP) 5154 P.M -.Yen La e m ■■•.1) AMITART OE•EA: 1. irAw Ma men -oar bra 40. ISM WM 551451 COMM (ply MMO P5a b' mar NMI km P 1M• s Mee.. pahr Ma al sae 2241 jab rear M_ lane magma. ar. am. ef .aolman war r M pip• nab meat Mae ugh raps. Men P1 47550510 Prat 2. hap. with pert rll.i Wen 551 M (5105* ant MCA m mort many .IMF 07514. Lp. ea MC Or en a*arm pear* 2 . E.••M IMO el * m a men, mar wee P err •M 150.•000 Mee not 47151010 TO Sri dram *0051 .arid ON. MO r 0000 1m r 0 par M4q-an r dear • aTrm M54-A weep aaprem.0 020µ5X *MOM r 51.00 w o r aY r (e r a p�rrM{p. Mme r el swam arm MM F era. oft .5 Rs re 5�. 2621. TM M brW a Ma far *des SW 55 maw M oar M al lest 30 Mg ham era • arras at M. M m r I. Sam oat 51000 MOM. Mwa • M a mmlr.m1 a)rn tame maw, era r P.o. parPya. na a n4MMe. Mn depth Of (IS 1...) iattorto on. a to � SMt�n. o � � 4p .0517 Pane .0000 HORSDINCE OVALS CV, ets nes OP. AN 88TX MAWS STEM 148113040/ REPRO 4LEVF OR OP/RM. 021.0L 51:Di. CONSTRUCT DOME DROP INNENEVER DROP NOW MOM 24 PICKS CRAW! DORT,* ALL /ROAD ii!• ter `-// OnovipS TO � Ma2M w21R Eli 700 OFTNEM APE MO Saga WM. MI yORTNI. MOT/61. NSPCC OURfNZ PUN WI inCKNOTS ;DR _9 isle IU• . Asir LIME ONSEIENNENSIMM SECTION A-A STANDARD SANITARY SEWER OUTSIDE DROP NATCNTOEM USER Het1.21040011 CALL FESCUE YOU DC NOW CD TOP R10.7 INV. 12535 ELECTRIC SERV= AND METER LOCATION 46 TOP 0012 MN. 002.5* 51.10 5B'I a TOP 0021 1142. 00243 ENV: 100.4 6 '4{ DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AND METER LOCATION PROTECTION SEANCE AND LOCATION ROSA COORDINATE NEW UG 0515 SEANCE WITH UTILITY COMPANY W TOP 010341 1051. 005• PROPOSED CAR WASH FF.E r 912.1 CAS METER LOCATION. 4. PROPOSED STATION STORE F.FE. a 912.6 TOP 000.4 Mg.. r's001W1 4' PVC SAN. 5. INVERT AT BLDG. r 906.10 cc SAN. 0. CLEANQj INV. m 904.52 SAN. S CLEAN 942. .1 903.38 lF 4' PVC TOP 504.7 MV. SOW. TOP 0112 1P10. 002.40 5. • 2.0 I it II h T. 10.2 TOP 00.0 ]Mr. N5.55. N O z W - •1. TOP 000.7 150,5. 05421 7/ // • / / Y/ 04 LP 120 • 0.3% S. CLENIOUT • 904.40 PRESSURE TAP CONNECT TO EX 10' WATERMAN. FIELD VERIFY SIZE 1010 LOCATION. t. F1E1D VERIFY NMI. 5ZE AND LOCATION PRIOR TO YANG 5.442. S. O U FIRI: IiY02R11NT TO NEW GRADE W TOP 500.1 INV. 410.14 LF 4 PVC 5. 0 2.0 TELEPHONE SEANCE WITH 0•101 COMPANY i RECEIVED FEB p 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES INSITES SIM R J ANH.L LANDSCAPE NOARCHIECNFE.ts 767 3111 8400 Holiday W a 0 O co CD z Z 0 w co I- a Q J 0 I�I Z CD J AIL •E•n«• RELATED To NDD1*2 AND CON1TRVCTIOM OF THIS PROJECT WALL 1E DD00505 TD NO MAY coupons PROJECT 11WA0ER 0m )111417 M101112001211 " w MAW now NW +O- PAL IMO wow. i1DwND m r m MOWN arc 1 r'Aserf r lla�P. "M AMCp•u rap m 151E ME LAWS OF OISE OF en. Man M M a r. 0425y5,., 1101. pa: N0. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 1 2142001011 REVIEW cols - Carttar m • ems rte Marra DATE 0212l03 PROD. NO. 2007 01 FILE COPY • • • Grad. Nona Refer to all other project plane arm information Mat.6 to Mi. work GRADE PLAN PREPARED PROM ALTA SURVEY BY ODM CoroWMg 12190.1 oM Surveyors 763- 786 -4570 Dated 2/20/06 Revised 3/2/06 Co.,, .,ct, Mall verify all existing am propoe.d .11.001ons prior to start of construction and notify owner of any conflicts Contractor shall locale am verify all utilities which may affect the work and notify Dever of pages. Contact load 610117 calp0nies for .Rail locations prior to commencing wait. Contractor shall take nsee0eory p180001iono n proven silt one debris run-off Wring grading operations. (ie. sill fence, Prow boles, eta! Refer to Holiday's specifications/ Geotec r report for Wtb, approach, bNmmauq and concrete profiles, as well cc additional sin 010020 -O remand to Mi. project. d critical shall verify crcal elevations to ensure conformance with grading plan, porticula4y with walk and/ or p00msnts to remain. Meet .0.1019 gradss at approach, Mang property lines and cvotruaion limit lima Restore all pavements Mat n to remain to their a'igi al, if not better condition Notify owner of any weallet& 11 roquewed by owner, Coatrvalor .hall install PVC &leevo under drive areas. Coordinate size and batmen of sleeve& Mtn owner. Areas not to be paved and to be landscaped shall receive memo@@ of N depth of conpue0.6 topsoil. All .100000 . Mown within the drive ammo will be top of preemie,. Top of curbs shell 8o 4• 1D4.12 curb and gutter) or 6• I86 -12 curb 0116 gutted above drive grads. Refer to plan for locoed All street rotoraion stall be done in oorrplim00 with city street impravmwv policy. Finished Station Store Floor Pimali 0 • 012.6 feet Cblatt2 fir Wasn FI.Or Elwai0n • 0111 Not Mao Onr ®PPG /MO. ew1"iwi i TYPICAL SECTION INFILTRATION BASIN .•ail St\ ONO PO.Omar ens OOP MAISOPO v• PO MVPs PM II moss was Mew vv w PP v RIPRAP AT STORM SEWER OUTLETS CXISTING 517E CONDITIONS ZONING DISTRICT: TOTAL SITE AREA EX. HARDCOVER 06 GENERAL OUSOR'55 165,271 5P PROP05110 SITE CONDITIONS RAN TAKING, 15.915 SP HOLIDAY 5TAT10N5T0RE: 62,679 5P PROPOSED RETAIL 68,557 5P BUILDING SETBACKS PROM STREET 30' REAR YARD 30 sloe YARD 10 565 369 PARKING SETBACKS PROM STREET 15' REAR YARD 10 SIDE TARO 10 HOLIDAY LOT PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED GREEN AREA 40,700 SP PROPOSED HARD COVER 51,676 SP PAVED AREA, 46,436 8P BUILDING AREA 6843 5P 0-STORE • CAR WASH • PARKING REQUIREMENTS PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED 449 565 505 69 1/200 6P PM 28 STALLS 26 STALLS, 12 SRV.PNTS. RETAIL LOT PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED GREEN AREA, 30630 5P PROPOSED HARD COVER 26,946 5F PAVED MEA 22,445 SP BUILDING MG 6500 SP PARKING REQUIREMENTS PARKING REQUIRED t/200 5P PM PARKING PROVIDED 519 469 369 115 20 STALLS 32 STALLS RETICHILIRK TOP SANITARY MANHOLE 36' SOUMNEIST OF WESTERLY PROPERTY COINER QEV. • 905.64 NEE 1. INFILTRATION BASIN AREA TO BE STAKED OFF PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. LIMIT COMPATION AND PROHIOIT HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT WITH IN BASIN AREA 1 INFILTRATION AREA SHOULD NOT BE EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE UNTIL THE SITE SOILS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND OUTFACES HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. 3 PINAL EXCAVATION OP BASIN SHALL BE COMPLETED USING LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT M SOIL COMPACTION MINIMIZED. NEW TOP •O•.7 IV. Cosa 4• 4• TOP 'GAS INV. 002_16 27 LP 11 HDP.E D 0.509 1 • _P INV.- 602.0 ANEW CO 66 TOP 010.7 NV. 60.!16 .46. tel 40 be le 166. MO LP 65'x' ['OPT. 0 O.A 0. T S INV. •0712 TOP .EE DOT INV. she DETAI 15 010.56 INV. 000]0 51. M.H TOP 004.0 ...JOS34 INN,. WWI 5M1 TOP •O•.7 INV. sa3.64 161 LP I- -OPt W 'yL TOP •011.9 INV. 004]6 TOP •0615 It/V. •0310 TOP INV 24 1.1. 18• / Z ../�" 57 30 D TOP 40•1 DN. 004.74 UJ CC r w 5 RECEDED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES INSITES 1025 w1.N1arAPP. ARCMIFCTURES Plume. n`0 *.o 70, iei 8.100 0 • Holiday I31 0050TIDW RELATID TO 5m0IRO AM WM7RUGTIa1 r THIS PROJECT W1A1E BE 011001 O TO HOLIDAY Co10ANY1 PROJECT MANAGER 447 NtST ,l POW STREET l0 IN SS W/ Plates era •30..10 P O010 AS II 1 h.rWay oer1Ny rho MN plan, apeclfoation, or report woe prepared by ma or under my areal .92.0.01181, and that I am a duly licensed Landscape Architect under Me laws of the Star. or Minnesota. Dale Rec. No. 10306 s toned Robert J. Mueller 90. DATE ROVWOII OHCRIPTIO8 1 5/6/00071911 REVIEW 0000001/ COPtaW• 3030. WISP Stn. NAMW O DATE O""'°' eRO.L Nn 5007 01 —vSP4 FILE COPY • • • • STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION: Apply for and obtdn all needed storm water permits from the appropriate acts candy oM load governmental agency. Stamm Ife.igfidgILPinston_am..26RE5 The SWPPP irelud.0 Eie narrative, the Grading, IXilly, end Erosion Control Plane, and the Detail *heeds. Keep b copy of the SWPPP, all changes to R, and msp.onons and maintenance record. al the see during the corearuaian ALL SILT FENCE MUST BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTED BY T1.12 CITY PRIOR TO ANY 517E WORK. CONTACT PROJECT MANAG(•,R HOLIDAY STATIONSTOREB 4567 AMPRICAN BLVD BLOOMINGTON. MN 052-830-8586 Erosion Control Noiee Per NP05 ca,pliarae, Conhv01a .hell toles necessary ersmu /iaro he prevent eat and debris run-elf during grating operations. lia alt ferns reek dikes, •rat C.Nro0ar .tae In.tdl M ✓ e.ion canned rtrwures prior to commencement of any see groans On a daily bow, Connector .hall n.pfot and maintain resign cannel devices through out the emir* construction Pried until all pavement* have been installed and Iond.aap areas have been .odd.d a,a stabilised Reek cenepuotian .ntrence.l.tans pads) Mall be heaped at all alb entry /exit pants AL tantrootor..hall remove einem .eel from tires on .0 mnstrualian vendee prior to Nosing the 0onesua00 .he. AR seamed on areas must be removed by the re.penable oonrasta0 each do% We .hall be re-vegetated ne in 411 hours of rough and red grading- .w L.d000p. Plan, Sheer LI, When provided as pen or coamtchon document sal. During eaeneed grading operations exposed eons shall be melded nth dean ergs man In prevent •aenesre cad IoM and *MP erasion On site temporary foil emkphng, N .farm on this Ran Shea, are suggested area. Any • w •eel wheel be trucked oft' see as neon as construction aline. All sale removed rron ate arse be the neeponsib6y of the controatar and are 0ublwd to erosion control standard. and meagemrd prachw. Stock pew arca W protected aganst erosion from wins and water. The coreramur .tall amnesia .lain ream./ amnion cannel lamM,I.I prior to inrlming work. Ali eine eater maw *hall be amend na temporary boars to abeam. suspended .olid. Wlt, .l.1 Iran leaving the avoruaron at. When permanent storm eater boobs me designsd far .h• .arm eater eeagement, Conevmer eau construct storm retention basin ail high..? Fierily, before inhaling overall grading .prates and the instdlden buildings or other .is famines At time of completion or dread, contractor .hall excavate all gnomon from the basin to reflect grades per plan Contractor .hell remove sediment cafes an repair .Ipe roam within 7 days of gash RIM Peiodi0 mammon= of me .Rant pendia all be required during a:nommen This malnteanse .11 be the responsibility of the mnemonic NI Iwo areas that are a 9. sodded aloe be stared on elopes greater then 31, as vial as in nfanogs .wales Areas to be seeded shall be maned acrediot6y upon seed 0ppeceenn H9pvuitiirg web wed N oanpn•bte provided the mulch and 0004 mania N reapplied in 6eee•d areas in a timely same. Slimed hydra rrulav g not retain mile in ae.ples drainage areas and .sale., mmveter shall install re mta ees or an to store acceptable vegaanv. covers ors in ploas. Note trtaf Nt ranee and rooked seas may reran in peas in prublernalic cress Corerachr Mall rneieein seeded and .added areas veil lawn cress ere fully esa6ished and manor sin rr eerweuNS after each stern ever - Contractor i. respectable for 0.0005 and searing Mr depotss ere n on Me storm systems when requ.eed by corner en athsr madden.. and m ms of propel ce nplenen -Refer to all other project plan and information rented to mi. work. Veg.toen Primev.tion Nam Corereelx Mall evoke Bee Mwagenee Practices to prevent all loss during p106ot. censfruore. Preserve man, vegsta901 by Wining work zones no hail the anus. of soil net Is daurbed during worn. phases or the projects / certain/idiom RPOII1P9n 91 IPP /RFVPGFTATION IN DAYS IPFRMANANT OR TEMPORARY COVER/ 10:1 OR FLATTER/ 21 DAYS MAX TO REVEO2TATIONSLOPE STABILIZATION' 10.1 TO 35 SLOPES/ 7 DAYS MAX TO R2VE0ETATION/ SLOPE STABILIZATION 2,p GREATER THAN 3:1/ 3 DAYS MAX TO R2V20ETATION/SLOPE STABILIZATION A. CONVEYANCE DITCHES/ COVERED WITHIN 24 HOURS OP DISTURBANCE • . t 501.9? NARRATIVE HOLIDAY STATION STORES INTENT TO IMPROVE AN EXISTING SITE THRU REDESIGN AND THE CREATION OF STORM WATER DEVICES TO PR0V10E CLEAN WATER DISCHARGE FROM THE EXISTING SITE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AS FOLLOWS: •INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES *INSTALL STORM SEWER *INSTALL STRUCTURES *INSTALL PAVEMENTS * INSTALL LAWN/ LANDSCAPE * FLUSH STORM SEWER .REMOVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ONLY AFTER ALL PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED AND ALL SOILS HAVE B22N STABILIZED THE RECEIVING WATERS OF THE 519 I5 MARSHAN LAKE SURFACE WATER LEAVES T142 SITE THRU CONVONTANCE DITCHES BEGINNING AT THE DITCH JUST SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY. EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING SILT FENCES ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES TEMPORARY ROCK DIKES TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM PONDS TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING STORM WATER CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL 2291025 TEMPORARY BERMS STREET CLEANING CONTRACTOR 0000 FAITH AND 088ERVATION PRACTICES NOTE: Final storm Warr pond as designed as planned due to lined land resources for small site, ponds such 00 these are ?9pcdly dente in the water abed knowing the Noted spool. we has to work wtlh. EROSION CONTROL SEED NATI"- SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET LI FXISTING SITE CONDITIONS ZONING DISTRICT: GO GENERAL 6USINES6 TOT SITE AREA AROCOVER: ROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS 100,271 5P a RAY TAKING: HOL HOLIDDAY TAIL:TORE RE .69060020 RETAIL Nerrt., SERVE AT TEMPORARY AND NAL 6WRY 6/ 0 do DIRECTED �ATr ` TO POND. TT- see TOMPORART POND N6CppP —.6592 APPROVE MUST LAN 2 APPROVED 6Y SHEET LI ITT PRIOR TO E060WG REND WATER 13216 SF 02,675 SP 50,507 5P 565 36% BUILDING SETBACKS PARKING SETBACKS FROM STREET 30 FROM STREET 15' REAR YARD 50 REAR YARD 10 8102 YARD 10 SIDE YARD 10 1:621.10A11212_6012=12_01.112111061 PROPOSED 00220 AREA PROPOSED HARD COVER: PAVED AREA: WILDING AREA C -STORE • CAR WASH • 40,700 SF 51,570 6F 46,436 9F 5545 SF 44% 56X 505 PARKING REQUIREMENTS PARKING REQUIRED 1/200 SP PM 25 STALLS PARKING PROVIDED 26 9TAL1-9 RETAIL LOT PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED GRE204 ARC, PROPOSED HARD 110922, PAVED AREA WILDING AREA PARKING REQUIREMENTS PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED 30635 SF 28,46 SF 22,448 SF 6500 6F 515 45% 3061 V200 SP PA. 20 STALLS 52 STALLS ERC 6C- PE DETAILS SHEET SPQ , v' 1 +. I i7 SHEET 916 .dI SHEET 596 RUCTION ENTRANCE PER SHEET SP6 usreNCE PER SHEET SP6 NO ACCESS RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES INSITES Pximwuke. Stn ne ne kg 774.7 7e7. .Deer bo W CC H 0 O u, H z /A' Z C/) / m Z O Y Q < J CO J ALL a1R6T10115 IRIATEO 70 11100606 AID tzx0Teuenas OP Ti16 PRoJeCT IINALI 1141 memo TO HOLIDAY 00401001 PROJECT Sanaa 10 Reel11aS STREET 00* *19 1 6117 wnorna M71 0117 00106 z0 cc la >e co o w I hereby certify that INN plan, speclncation, or u o 0?t a a a der my direct supervision, and that 1 ann o duly licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the Stare of Minnesota. Date Roc. 6.. 16306 Signed Robert J. Muller N0. DATE MISSION WO®TION __T este -.MO son AIM= DATE 01/0/07 PML NB 2007 a 5P5 FILE • • • WOODEN LATHE SHALL BE NAILED SECURELY 10 THE POST HEWN TO SECURE FLIER FABRIC. 2.04'X6 L000 POSTS, B 0600. 2' X 4' HORIZCNTAL MEMBERS CCNTINUOIUS MOUND TOP, FASTENED TO 6401 PDST USING 2 -200 COMMON NAILS SILT (GEOTEX1116) FEND AS SPECIFIED. BOTTOM e' W FABRIC TO BE BURIED TO PREVENT UNOERMASWNG. MN. BURY SILT FENCE 3/4. CLEAR ROCK 1 DEEP X 1' WOE CONTRACTOR TO SET POSTS AN0 FABRIC AROUND THE BASIN DURING THE BA001WNG OPERATOR. SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE BARRIER SHALL BE MOOIFlED 10 P1T STRUCTURE SILT FENCE 10 BE PLACED AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER TOP OF SILT FENCE 10 HAVE 12' MIN. CLEARENCE TO DOMING GRADE. STANDARD DETAILS EROSION CONTROL AROUND CATCH BASIN MI pA C PUS .'�� M► MINIMUM DEPTH �>•• e • Ilke e� 444• • • • • NA~ �Y• is e — 2" WASHED ROCK 18' MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. STANDARD DETAILS ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Owriap geotestib fabrie 6' and fasten at 2' interveb Direction of runoff Extend wire mesh into trench 2 x 2' wood or steel fence post, 8' max. spacing Wire mesh reinforcement. Std. field fence, min. 30' high, ml. mesh spacing 6 and min. 14 1/ gauge 0.060.tile fabric — overlap fabric 6 and fasten at 2' intervals Lay fabrie in the trench 7 Fabric anchorage trench Bockfill trench with tamped natural soil Support post anchorage — situ 'I meth mortar as speed MN. S C�o1 Note; Attach fabric to wire mesh and support posts with rings or wire ire ties STANDARD DETAIL$ SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY STANDARD DETAILS INLET PROTECTION AROUND CATCH BASIN Support post anchorage in —situ sal 6' MN. 2' z ' ood poet steel fence po 5' minimum length at 4' maximum spacing Geote0Ule fabric — overlap fabric 6' and fasten at 2' intervals Lay fabric in the trench Fabric anchorage trench BacWN trench ith tamped natural m1 Note; Attach fabric to 1 support W staple STANDARD DETAILS SILT FENCE ANCHOR TRENCH (SEE DETAIL AND NOTES BELOW) — OVERLAP END JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6' AND STAPLE OVERLAP AT 1.5' INTERVALS STAPLE DENSITY SMALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 U— SHAPED 8', 11 GAUGE METAL STAPLES PER SQUARE YARD (THIS MAY VARY AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY). ANCHOR 1RENCH 1. DIG 6' X 6' TRENCH 2. LAY BLANKET IN TRENCH 3. STAPLE AT 1.5' INTERVALS 4. BACKFILL 'MTH NATURAL SOIL AND COMPACT 5. BLANKET LENG111 SHALL NOT EXCEED 100' WITHOUT AN ANCHOR TRENCH OVERLAP LONGITUDINAL JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6' STANDARD DETAILS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES • • OAR 0110/07 000J. ND. 2007 01 INSITES ri.m ou � <<h ss<o Holiday W 1- CC 0 p W CO Z Z O w Q < rJ 1- /� �� Z yr -J ALL 280Tlolls MATEO TO AMMO AND 880728T1aN or Ties Feu= SHALL SS ORSCRO TO IDLDAY COPANIS PROJECT KNAVES n ew Weer spa must 4001.18.0, er 4100 NM PAS pw 4o-m NO. DATL REVISION 50060101ION Laf0WQTY RSV= mmowR 4sP . nenn rte Mina FILE COPY • - MIX SHALL BE A PORMILATEO GRASS AR0 WILDELOWER MIX W CONJUNCTION WITH THE GIFTS SEEDING PROCEDURES. SEED SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR THIS TEMPERATE DMZ 6 60L CONDITIONS. 111 ALL POND BASINS, FROM A MIS SELOW NWL TO A00VE HMI, MO SHALL BE PORMWTED SPECIFICALLY PCP LAKE SHORE RESTORATION AND EMBANKMENT STAN, T7AION AND/0R AS SPECIFIED IN THE CITtr9 NATIV1 SEED MIL .3I -•' 1B UP -LAND ZONES 1ABOVe NINEt- USE VARIABLE HEI6HT ME81G WILDFLOWER/ GRASS MIX TO INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE POLLOWDD: mown n, Hi em wAoM0/e.1. 26.4 amned4 1AOW NNM -NwL @16rNe 60.S. O eopMmfeWS. G2rrmwmwe lases GRASSER -IMNn p.¢9i9 Hate Little Hume. CorMde rOd 64t, Switch Co rve Sender red Gas, I4.NY Amer* IN WETLAND /POTATIONS [BELOW HSU- USE TALL/WET WILDFLOWER MIX MIX SHALL CONTAIN NO 1E96 THAN 20 DIFFERENT PLANT SPECIES SUITABLE FOR T419 LOCATION. GPI CII8 SMALL Be SIMILAR TO THOSE TO Be UTILIZED IN REGIONAL WETLANDS TO IN0.UOE OUR NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: PORBES -Amy patient, I.Bdis.Lp,NINDILI 4SoolI Pmleipli5Asoleek E incemtio. O1ALS1S -Mie0 pee. HIP 6WA /NM Memene Meade rUd Rp, hie Crete Mira* Sap Sins thins" Really Saba* Cord Clem - WEIGHT 0P 5100 MAT BE 0A80D ON PURE LIVE SEED IP151 AND MUST be A PRODUCT DP. ZONE 5 AND ZONE 4 HARDINESS PRAIRIE SEED. NO SOUTHERN SOUR= 59 t M1ti 669 � H / N /f INSTAI LATION AND IMRAOPMONL- -CONTRACTOR SMALL PROVIDE INSTALLATION B10, FOR LIVE NATIVE PLANTS IN CONJUCTION WITH SEED AT P1RDRT165 ar 1NPILTRATION AND STORM POND. SHOULD PLANTINGS NOT TAKE, CONTRACTOR SHALL. REIN5TAL INSTALL LIVE PLANTS TO ENSURE PROPER P14145 ESTABLISHMENT AND TO REDUCE EROSION - CONSTRA0T01 SHALL ERRA01CATe DUSTIN° GRASS 8 WEEDS WITH 'ROUNDUP AND DISK THE SOIL. TO A 4-6. DEPTH 2 WEEKS AFTER APPLICATION OF HER9IUDE. - MIX SHALL BE A FORMULATED SUSS AND WILDFLOWER NIX SUITABLE FOR THIS TEMPERATE 20100 8 601L CONDITIONS. MIX SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OP 70 LBS. OP P15 PER ACRE. - CONTRACTOR SMALL USE A NOISE CROP SEED, SUCH AS ANNUM. NITS/LASS, IN ADDITION TO THE WILD PLOWER/WETLAND MIX TO 5TASILIZL 5008 IN ALL AREAS. BROA0 CAST SEED MIXTURES WITH A BROAD CAST beeves OR HYOR031ED WARILCN. IP SEED 1S BROADCAST, CONTRACTOR SHALL INTEGRATE SEED INTO SOIL TO DESIRED DEPTHS AS Re10MMe1Dm BY THE SUPPLIER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE 016916ATIDR -00 NOT FERTILIZE -INSTALL AN APPROVED BI001RADA610 1605100 CONTROL MATTING IN STALES OR SLOPES THAT PRESENT A STRONG POTENTIAL DP 1X0159151 MILL' EROSION 1106 SEEDED AREAS use GIIEENEI14115724 11ude0,g,ne lM Sao Comet OR APPROVED EQUAL APPLY CLEAN SEED MULCH SUCH AS STRAW IN ALL AREAS TO RETAIN MOISTURE A/40 ENSURING ADEQUATE GERMINATION. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MANAGED FOR A MINIMUM OF 5 TEARS 91 CITY APPROVED CONTRACTOR -AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED UNDER SEVERE DROUGHT TO 19TAOLI594 00MPLere UNIFORM GERMINATION OF SEED MIX R IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OP THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM PERIODIC VISITS TMRU 191 GROWING SG50N AS PART OF THIS CONTRACT AND GUARANTEE TO NORM PROPER EBTASLISME6T OF GRASSES AND 1108019. NOTIFY OWNER OF POSSIBLE P60CE1DUR19 101161VENT LOSS OF PLANTS, POTENTIAL EROSION, AND'SOLND GROWTH. -MAN MANAGEMENT 19 NOT TO BE USED. PERIODIC MOWING OF ALL MEAL SMALL BE eltJFOR PROVIDE MAINTENACE PROPOSAL TO THE OWNER FOR PROPER GUTAA EN The ENMT A8 MAY 0E RELATED TO 1 GUARANTEE OP 6610 INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR IS ONE RESPOSISLE FOR ROWING SE MEAL AS NEEDED AFTER ONE COMPLETE GROWING SEASON 31 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBER i Y�LNr'»>ARi .46 Rf166- 65 �465- W3e" 26 MARGARITA YEW 4' death Wrecked bark "Molt M plam9y o1K No niter fame, ergo= noddles 1 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBER 31 NORTHERN PIN OAK Alt .°41. ��.��.WIRIIMI� ff rA V •11.5 • h..1 : _Li • ON IN AITObloh'n03Nfe °R'-AR 0 DG Wildflower habitat 'n 005ENE0 TO A 190 entrance ante Una. MIN. DEPTH PRIp1 TO PLANTING • • 1 Ise Ig L y ORS: 00 balm mulch h tRr���1 '1I .rs...S Ns Tire rab0a 99 nun between I and bed. i09X'S _ 1 f I .,, Nam 1► '4 :'="q; 1 U o.-0:6 fM;t !; 1� .1 .41211E REPAIR LAKE DRIVE N dpth *odd. Semi melon e planting area. tie IV.r fable under' ergo= mulches. PSV5 0490'° between Ian one 030 I hl 12 EMERALD TRIU / 2 NORTHERN PIN OAK • 1.1_1 EMERALD TRIUMPH VIBURN M 69 BLUEBERRY DELIGHT JUNIPER Z NOR' TH OU i So' IP VIBURNUM NOTES' • CONTRACTOR SHALL 06TA1N ALL NECESSARY PERMITS P0R PLANTING WORK - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY EFFECT HIS WORK. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL • 454 -0002 FOR EXACT LOCATIONS. - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHERS AT SITE AND COMPLETE 1118 WORK PER OWNERS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. - ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL Be GUARANTEED 014E II PU11. TEAR UPON TOTAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER, WITH ONE TIME REPLACEMENT AT APPROPRIATE TIME OR UPON REQUEST OF OWNER - REPLACEMENT TOPSOIL SHALL be CLEA71 FREE OF STONES, WEEDS, AND OTHER UNDESIRABLE DEBRIS. - PLANTING SOIL MIX INCIDENTAL COST ITEM) 1. MO 3 LB. 5 -20.10 COMMERCIAL PERTILI2ER PER 04. Y0. TOPSOIL 2. THOROUGHLY MIX 1 -PART SAND AND I -PART PEAT M099 W114 5 -PARTS FERTILIZER AND TOPSOIL • USE PLANTIN0 900. AT ALL LOCATIONS PER DETAILS 11418 SHEET. - TOP SOIL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4. DEPTH. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TOPSOIL DEPTH AND NOTIFY OWNER OP ANT DEFICIENCY. TOP180L SHALL Be TILLED DEEPLY INTO THE SUB 5011. IN UNIFORM CONSISTANCY TO A S' DEPTH. • 500 SHALL Be CULTURED WITH PREDOMINATELY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED OF RECENT DISEASE RESISTANT INTRODUCTIONS NO GUARANTEE ON SOD EXCEPT ANY 500 NOT SATISFACTORY AT TIME OF COMPLETION INSPECTION SHALL BE PROMPTLY REPLACED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF J00. STAKE 500 ON SLOPES 5:1 AND GREATER - ALL SOD AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED. - WHERE EXISTING CONCRETE/ ASPHALT AREAS ARE TO BE REPLACED WITH LANDSCAPING, PROVISIONS SHOULD Be TAUTEN TO C00R01NATE EXCAVATION OF SUBSOIL TO A 0111TH OF 2' WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR REPLACE WITH 4' COMPACTED TOPSOIL ALL AREAS TO BE LANDSCAPED AND SODDED SHAD BE GRADED SMOOTH AND EVEN - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR 19 RESPONSIBLE FOR 50DDIN0 Sly AREAS W14104 ARE DISTURBED 51 CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING ALL RO.W. AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL VALLEY VIEW, 'SLACK DIAMOND' EDGING AROUND ALL PLANTING BEDS AS NOTED ON THIS PLAN. - use 594010010 HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. INSTALL M DEPTH. NO FILTER FABRIC OR 100100 AROUND ALL TREES LOCATED OUTSIDE SHRUB BEDS - GRAVEL MULCH SHALL BE 1-1/24 DTA 'RYAN RED ROCKY INSTALL N DEPTH WITH APPROVED WEED PAORIC BARRIER AS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN. - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FCR IRRIGATED! SYSTEM D1510N AND INSTALLATION PER CITY LANDSCAPE 5111UFICATIONS DESIGN SHALL BE APPROVED 0T OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION IRRIGATION DESIGN 9140111A ENCOMPASS ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WITH SOD AND/ OR PLANTINGS, FROM CURB TO CURB ROW. SHOULD BE IRRIGATED FROM SPRINKLER meA08 LOCATED WIT44171 PROPERTY BOUNDARY. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN IN VICINITY OP ALL WALKS AM/ DRIVES TO MINIMIZE OVER SPRAT. IRRIGATION INSTALLATION SHALL NOT INTER11ERE WITH C1TY WALKS AND TRAILS COORDINATE INSTALLATION OP ALL PVC SLEEVE UNDER DRIVE AREAS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL 16E1T WITH PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. • IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED Pen CITTS IRRIGATION POLICY. • IRRIGATION SHALL Be REQUIRED TO HAVE RAIN SENSORS. - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN ALL PAVEMENT AREAS AFTER ALL LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION 111 COMPLETE AND ACCEPTED BY OWNER. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO SWEEP PAVEMENT AREAS PRIOR TO 14109 0516 TO OWNER - LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO SEED DISTURBED AREAS AS NOTED WITH MN DOT GRASS MIX 500. SEED PER IN DOT DESIGN SECTION 5876 TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PLANT MATERIAL ONTY. 9IZe 1100; COMM NAME NA TYPE BOTANICON AL ME 4 2A° CAL.. OLD NORTHERN PIN OAK 0u.rc e elbemoidal. 4 NY HT. CLUMP 980 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICI9ERRY Am.Ionchi.r x granWnara 'Autumn OrillioneW 16 24. SPIT POT MARGARITA T� W Team. media 'Mongered 00 24' SPIT POT DLUIDIRRY DELIGHT JUNIPER Juniper,. aumnume depremeo 'Ami0a6' 21 BD' HT ppT EMERALD TRIUMPH VIBURNUM Viburnum 6 'Emerald Triumph. NOTE PLANT SELECTIONS BASED ON ZONE, ERVIRO61NT, AND CONDI11011 HARDNESS. SALT TOLERANCE LEVELS ARE MODERATE TO GOOD BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED IN TEXT DIM //ARCM TREES AND SHRUBS' BY MICPAIL A DIRK AP/0 THROUGH LOCAL NURSERY WHOLESALE LISTINGS. MISC. 000, EDGING, P AN1190 SOIL, ORAVIL MULCH, FILTER FABRIC RECEDED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES INSIPTES SltrnA..I.N.SCAPEAKMRIR RPA 3 P Plrea.i63-313.1:0a 33.47 Holiday W cc 0 Z 0 1- U) O co W 5Z ie W 0 Z J ALL I039T10* RELATED TO 1100400 PO CONSTRICTION OF 7311. PROJECT NNALL be DIRECTED TO HOLIDAY coPPA09 PROJECT MANAGER NU WEST emu pater W 4.437 SeareS On CO— SAX IPM 1130-MM I hereby certify that 11tee plan, specification, porn or under a prepared Is supervision, and that I am duly licensed Land0acp. Ar0Wleot under the lows of the State of MInM.ota. Dote R . No. 19506 Robert J. Muell5 N0. DATE REVISION Descs eTION 1 VS/2007 QTY REVIEW 1101A! CarBWT ua. - IIAIn 6C1e IMAM. DATE 0N11/07 PR5.1 NO. 2007 01 FILE COPY • • • SCALE : 1/4' = I' -0• RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES JA Sagat Architects, P.A. 4159 Grand Avenue South Minneapolis. Minnesota 55409 Phone: 612 822 -8200 FAX: (612) 822-0608 inloflnpta><ehitect6com Holiday ALL 00'TONS P ATED TO CR ▪ THIS PRCKELT SMALL 09 DRECIRD TO M CVAY GO1RAM1E5 ranEGT HANKER 9GOTT ALrNNN . MUN•, .e3 COTT STREET �/(GIT� TM 554E7 FIRM (may 000-1616 c 0 O O LL I Neadr GORIrY "NAT TMD se SC2rY�r a[ REPORT MAe dr x o■ enee MT n1 444 94rl Y LICENSED MO # 4 I AM A OILY LA2M ' 7 C STATE ' P4I TI! LAM Q M efAlE Q MNOOTA MOOT NAME JOIN A SARAT snowman DATE. LICENSE A 1]900 NO. DATE Td,4401D6GRr°W DATE VSl T ROIL NO. cewee -V= HLE C �PV 2' -0• .-a. 4' -0• T -' 2'i' -• , -I ! _— - NM, —, - 3 O 1�1 a Ft .:71 _..A '„ 1 'WA_ . lllllllll i ' — — - ■ iii i I! ill _••i _n i, - _ Ism I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIpIIIIlIIl 1IIIlIl111111llll I IIIIIIIIIII 1111111 1llllll111 IV.11 _ illllll 1 h 1:'111 II i IMIIII I IIIIIIIII II IIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIII II IIIIUIII 11 II1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIl11I1111111IIIIIIl1IIIl1IIIIIIIIIII111111111 :I11I0IUII11 Illllllll ll lllllllll ll IIIIIIIIbl m111111111IIIIIIIIIIn1IIII111111ll1 • � II � 1.-6. ■■■ lI (i►�;1_ . ,• � GAR WASH SAY =' ° — - -9- IMIIITI , n Y I�� 1 V O c11[MIGAL 9W 6ALLp1 TANK TANKS rATeLS O ® (J �) 9r9,gri%IPMENT III - -- � - \I - 1•i`�• ° ° YIATER 52RVILE 111 �1` PUMP VVV - STAND CONTROL ro° . IB'- bi'.T1'1134'N5P ROOM - O O / STORAGE I •'' 1y n RAINMAKER ELrx.,wcAL 96'_B4X12Y34' N� �- II -- -- - - - - -- -- -- - -- II WOMEN c 3� -- - - - - -- I - - II $ - I I 12'-54'•,2424' KR` & DOOR WALK -IN FREE Ib' -9' VVV O 06�e4' =T3Y04' TOP 1T DOOR WALK -IN COOLER n 49'-10' ? 49'-6 I/O' � 0 • R I -11' 5 -0' 9' 4-5 9'. 9-0 4'4' R• 9'-6 Irl' b'-0 I/2• 19' -51 /0" -6• i / / / / /'/ III /// /P' // /////// 7. Z 2 i ilimil 1INK_ _I– —_ il qq 1 1 t I ,, " 6• ss' 4bYle 5/56 n 2' s4' 4a•.Ib BASE 34X646• SALES FLOOR °'e0 I3' -T 9/O' y a e bb• BA E �u� I 1 I u Is Ilenl 9' -II 3/5' 9'-0' 9' -0' 3' -T 9/4' IIII�III I 1 ADA i ,iul ,■.I K r TT Q 41-6. i 0 NEW ill -° TRASHRM ° ° ° 4 : - — — ■n ._4T III °B�� ` a © - 4 654:,a•.6•DATE ry ''•40•.16" BASE m ^ w� •' ! © 6 - x4e'ra• epee �'- - { -0; ! DESK. I ° � � n ■ A • •I�i '� I I I ICI• +• 4110 eit 1 41111 2' -0' I I Q I5'-4• -WO. . 3' -1 9/4• 16' -10 1/4• / 9' -1 5/4'/ 5' -1 I/O 15-4• 2' -0• / 10' 0 Ines/— Ij 11 11 1 I1 I1 Inn/-7/-7I II II I I / 1 1 .LOOK K AN SCALE : 1/4' = I' -0• RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES JA Sagat Architects, P.A. 4159 Grand Avenue South Minneapolis. Minnesota 55409 Phone: 612 822 -8200 FAX: (612) 822-0608 inloflnpta><ehitect6com Holiday ALL 00'TONS P ATED TO CR ▪ THIS PRCKELT SMALL 09 DRECIRD TO M CVAY GO1RAM1E5 ranEGT HANKER 9GOTT ALrNNN . MUN•, .e3 COTT STREET �/(GIT� TM 554E7 FIRM (may 000-1616 c 0 O O LL I Neadr GORIrY "NAT TMD se SC2rY�r a[ REPORT MAe dr x o■ enee MT n1 444 94rl Y LICENSED MO # 4 I AM A OILY LA2M ' 7 C STATE ' P4I TI! LAM Q M efAlE Q MNOOTA MOOT NAME JOIN A SARAT snowman DATE. LICENSE A 1]900 NO. DATE Td,4401D6GRr°W DATE VSl T ROIL NO. cewee -V= HLE C �PV • • • D 1 FNSH ROOK - STORE I \ I RONT (90UT14) ELEVATION All SCALE : lib" = I'-O" n TOP OF BRICK EL 116-0. TOP OP SOLDIER COURSE EL IO -0' TOP OF NTN IXPE • a KM -0T . EIPS PILASTER BOTTOM OP MOONS EL WY-O' 1 FlN9N FLOOR - STORE • EL IOO-0' ROCKGAOT PILASTER BASE ROGK -PAGE GHU (f' 9AGK (NORTH) ELEVATION Al SCALE : I /D" • I' -0" a•u1u6NATED CNlV48 LETTRS ILLUMINATED EXIT SLATED BRICK POLYGMRBONATE OvE NERD DOOR • OP RICK 10-6" TINE L91R FIXTIRE T SOLDIER CQNSE IL?'O ZS "S PILASTER PLASTER BASE EH FLOOR - MORE ROOKfALE 10040' ERICK. MAIN MORLMC =OR BLED A MORTAR COLOR, NATURAL OAST STONE: ROCKCA0T ISI PP9TOK GOIOR AS NPR BY READI• ROCK SLATED DRICK 62 l8UE): BAIN -EURR SLATED ERICK, 4M 9RIB, COLOR, 64460 ROOK-PAGE GML NHS NC01A BROM MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS EPS (EXTERIOR OBLATION FINISH SYSTEM COLOR. DRYYIT FLOG MANOR MITE F61314 . 9ANDPEBBLE STOREPRONT, DARK BROOM ANODIC MALL GAP FLASMNS. IAA GLAD RESAL MO. Cal) MAST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE : 1 /D" • I' -0" 4 EAST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE , I /O" = I'-0 TOP FIN - RED -�- 6.GK6FOIND - RR1T8 ',Free x - RED LOMB[ x - BUM BOTTOM FN - BLUE 51611 FEU" - I® 14' -0' BLACK OOILA! CP L06O AND LETTERS Holiday r4) EXI9TIN9 HI -RISE SISN A2 SCALE : NOT TO SCALE RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Sagat Architects, P.A. 4159 Grand Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55400 Phone: (012) 822 -8200 FAX: (012) 822 -0808 E -Yell: infMeegatarebitcete.eom Holiday ALL arbno.B RRLATL D TO EDTXN6 AW GORIFIRCTIaN OP DNS PRD.EGT SHALL S DIRECTED TO HOLIDAY COMPANIES PROJECT MNARER SCOTT ALPALWI 4007 MST BOTH STREET ' PAw mown manor CERTPV TAT DOS PVA 91GIPIGTT FR ORRAD PIA6 PRSAIRm TI COR PORT MY DIRECT SUPERVISOR AIC THAT 1 AM A GILT LK10 6" ANGMILGT 110' M R T*. ! CP raw NAM, .NINA SHOAT 91YMT PS DATA LICENSE A G960 ND. DATE REVISION DIEORIPTION I OA)MI FLAN REI1 CLIPIMINT 297 OA. M.1==1.A. DATE IRE SODI meal In. 060RaS E. • es ~ �- Rc Hi �ii e� HE ii • OP RICK 10-6" TINE L91R FIXTIRE T SOLDIER CQNSE IL?'O ZS "S PILASTER PLASTER BASE EH FLOOR - MORE ROOKfALE 10040' ERICK. MAIN MORLMC =OR BLED A MORTAR COLOR, NATURAL OAST STONE: ROCKCA0T ISI PP9TOK GOIOR AS NPR BY READI• ROCK SLATED DRICK 62 l8UE): BAIN -EURR SLATED ERICK, 4M 9RIB, COLOR, 64460 ROOK-PAGE GML NHS NC01A BROM MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS EPS (EXTERIOR OBLATION FINISH SYSTEM COLOR. DRYYIT FLOG MANOR MITE F61314 . 9ANDPEBBLE STOREPRONT, DARK BROOM ANODIC MALL GAP FLASMNS. IAA GLAD RESAL MO. Cal) MAST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE : 1 /D" • I' -0" 4 EAST SIDE ELEVATION SCALE , I /O" = I'-0 TOP FIN - RED -�- 6.GK6FOIND - RR1T8 ',Free x - RED LOMB[ x - BUM BOTTOM FN - BLUE 51611 FEU" - I® 14' -0' BLACK OOILA! CP L06O AND LETTERS Holiday r4) EXI9TIN9 HI -RISE SISN A2 SCALE : NOT TO SCALE RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Sagat Architects, P.A. 4159 Grand Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55400 Phone: (012) 822 -8200 FAX: (012) 822 -0808 E -Yell: infMeegatarebitcete.eom Holiday ALL arbno.B RRLATL D TO EDTXN6 AW GORIFIRCTIaN OP DNS PRD.EGT SHALL S DIRECTED TO HOLIDAY COMPANIES PROJECT MNARER SCOTT ALPALWI 4007 MST BOTH STREET ' PAw mown manor CERTPV TAT DOS PVA 91GIPIGTT FR ORRAD PIA6 PRSAIRm TI COR PORT MY DIRECT SUPERVISOR AIC THAT 1 AM A GILT LK10 6" ANGMILGT 110' M R T*. ! CP raw NAM, .NINA SHOAT 91YMT PS DATA LICENSE A G960 ND. DATE REVISION DIEORIPTION I OA)MI FLAN REI1 CLIPIMINT 297 OA. M.1==1.A. DATE IRE SODI meal In. 060RaS • • • 24• ILLUMINATED OIWeC LETTER. AND LO6o Holiday 811099 DAMON MEAL, R8L24 eOI p240 D' (ONE RR COLUe1 ON MOE PALMA WOW) 2424 COLUMN MELODIES 82422088120. iilff I ECAR:__ Sfl GAR WA5• IDENTIPIGATION (!BAST AND WEST) oi ENTRANCE IOM SO PT CAR WASH DIRECTIONAL 6I6NA6E (EAST) 9 EXIT 675 SD PT GAR WASN DIRECTIONAL SIONA8E O T) 2446 6a IT TOP PM -I® UPPER N - RID Lanni 1P - 91,20 - 60T7014 PIN - eue ft °""/". SION 9ONDE., Seem 91614 PIED -RED - MAGIC OUTLIt a O' i n S 4 LOGO AND LaTTIM 1 P•STE vPR1e /461 BK64m 0 7399 Rm Lm PRICE SIGN - 841112 LUTE A / 611®4 248RD R.•OK 12710 ON 29129AGK6ROIAD - OEXISTING PYLON SION e leNA/! AMA SMMmDeN 140LDAY STATIOICTOW ID, Lm 81112! 5IGN RUDER BOARD TOM. (PaR 54644 FAGS SCALE , I/4' e V-0' is 4 n L 466 OR Pt 24D em PT 11D86 PT 664 SO PT SI6NARA SCALE VARIES RECERIED FEB 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Sagat Architects, P.A. 4159 Grand Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409 Phone: (615) 652 -6200 FAX: (612) 222 -0209 2 -Ms11: inio*eyahcehitacte.en a Holiday ALL OLYIIS18 NSATTD TD Q STN P24 0T 'NALL Mr De4cTm TO HOLIDAY 1OITM® 400.10671441A6C1 eCOTT 61•44•# YT MST 0412 EMMY fACTID eeo. I FEMME faeIMY TOO 715 E1W e ,/�LF I�RpOFl,ATION OR IMPORT DV NE OR OEM MY Oe ECT SUPERVIDON THAT I AIM A GILT LIMN= Ammar uove• Ile LAN, OP MONTNAD, JlNI SADAT S8MUTY16 DATE Leann A Mee NO. DAR 1441!11 DISO PROM I 2/074 81+1 1Nb1 Ge.wa•.10,1 - YAM'/ 047at8PA. OAR U6'2?OT PDOl NO. COMM A3 FILE'� fel • • LEGEND 1 FOOT CANDLES 10 FOOT CANDLES 0.5 FOOT CANDLES $° $° To° $° $o $a $0 $° $o a° $o T° $° $° $° 0 $O $° $° $0 $° $0 $° .4o _ $o _ 4° 0 . To° $o $° $° $o Co 4° $O 4° _ $> 4> $" $> $° $° $° $° *° $o $° $O Q° $° $o $0 $O $` $7' $ 4t. $2 41: $1 4� $N • M *2 $, $1 $, - $` $7' $2 $1 $° $° $° $° o 436 t ♦ ' . .' *p ` $2 2 ♦ 0 T6 $a sss *s $° i) 42 $, $0 Qo $° $O is $° $° $o $° $O $0 $o $° 4° $0 $0 N 2 ♦ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O $ ° $0 $9 $° $° $° $° $° $° $° $0 4O $° $O $° $0 $° $° $0 O O O :O sir° O O O O O O O O O O O O O- O O O O O • BOUORTLns ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN r' = 2O'•o RECEIVED FEB 0 9 2007 CM' OF LINO LAKES MIREITiA■IM NRA 44840.4AM AsseWS.Nc Coollep Nom 0111.444444 w.w `ssm R...4..s ..minpw000 IA WINED. Holiday 0 cn- V ) Z � 0 c O v / ALL QUESTIONS RELATED TO 80360 Or TNIS P11O.E0T SHALL R DIRECTED TO 110LIDAT COMPARES PROJEOT 1444ASER 44OTT ALEAL4FI 4567 A!@OLAN H 54 NEST 14110145 14.+z5 6360.43"6¢ I� PAX (352) 000 -*•43 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 1 DREW MEND TAT N66 14L04.4 5PE0I1410ATO( OR REPORT MAE PI40.44107 T fe aR uDeE DIRECT SUPERVISION DV TAT 1 AMA DIET 1.1GSe a re ER ON NI1Np0TA DAR: //01 1E. 40.11441 vote N0. DATE REVISION Dl5GIEPSON 0241444 2■744• 43!54536 D NM. IC DAR. /401 44041. IN . 010010,001' S/ E1 FILE CO • • • AGENDA ITEM VIII. A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: February 14, 2007 TOPIC: Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel and Planning Process BACKGROUND The large scale planning process has reached the point where it is time to move into the next phase. The City conducted a citizen survey in 2005. Our Resource Management Plan is being prepared by the Rice Creek Watershed District. A citizen committee prepared 2030 Visioning Plan and presented it to the City Council. With the completion of the Spotlight on 2030 Community Visioning Process the City is preparing to commence with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan update. The process will commence in March and result in the completion of a draft plan by May of 2008. Following a required 6 month adjacent jurisdiction review period, the new Comprehensive Plan would be submitted for Metropolitan Council review in November of 2008. A core component of the public participation process is the establishment of a Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel. The 30- member advisory panel will consist of: • all members of the Planning & Zoning Board • three members from each of the other advisory boards (total nine) (Environmental Board, Park Board, Economic Development Advisory Committee) • nine members of the Visioning Committee • five members at large, appointed by the City Council The advisory panel will meet on the third Wednesday of each month, with some additional meetings as needed. The advisory panel will be supplemented by our consultant team (DSU, Inc. will facilitate the process) and the technical review committee, consisting of City staff and representation from other govemmental agencies as necessary. The first advisory panel meeting is proposed for March 21St The entire process is broken down into 6 phases as follows: Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 Information Gathering and Project Initiation Goals & Policies Alternatives Analysis Draft Plan Preparation Agency and Adjacent Jurisdiction Review Metropolitan Council Review and City Adoption of Final Plan • • • Public open houses will occur during Phase 3 and 4. The required public hearing on the draft plan will be held at the end of Phase 4. In addition to the public open houses, information will be available on the City's web site. We plan to post all work on the website as it is completed. We will supplement this with newsletter articles and press releases. Approximately 1 year has been added to the process from what was originally anticipated. This is due in part to the timing of the completed visioning process and increasing public participation in the process. The Comprehensive Plan Update process will commence with a kick -off meeting on March 7, 2007. This meeting will include the City Council, all advisory board members, and the advisory panel. Representatives from other governmental agencies will also be invited. The purpose of the meeting is to review the planning process, the schedule, and an executive summary of existing conditions/background report. The Rice Creek Watershed District will also be presenting an overview of the Resource Management Plan component of the process. The first advisory panel meeting is proposed for March 21st The attached diagrams illustrate the makeup of the advisory panel and the planning process. On the public participation process diagram, the yellow line represents how the issues and draft documents will be brought to the various boards and City Council for discussion and recommendations as the project proceeds. Attachments: Advisory Panel - Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update Compilation of Proposed Planning Process Preliminary Public Participation Process - Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update • O 00 O 00 O 00 9 Members from the Visioning Committee • 3 Members, each, from the Park Board, Environmental Board, and Economic Development Advisory Committee Advisory Panel - Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update February 2007 • The 7 Members of the Planning and Zoning Board AA AAA 5 At -large Citizens v le L '1F DSU Bonestroo March 2006...July 2006 November 2006 March 2007 July 2007 December 2007 Comprehensive Plan Update Rice Creek Watershed Distr Resource Mgm Plan ct April 2008 October 2008 Jan. 2009 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Select Citizen issue Community Desired Outcomes Visioning Identification Vision Met Council " (formal review) Committee •r► rr ••r Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 Inventory & Analysis Goals & Policies Alternatives Draft Plan Adjacent Jurisdictions, School District, Watershed Districts, Met Council " (formal review) Met Council (informal) Phase 1 Inventory, Survey, etc. Compilation of Proposed Planning Process Phase 2 Modeling • • • • • • • Phase 3 Prepare Resource Management Plan Phase 4 Review & Approval February 2007 City of Lino Lakes, MN Na. • • • September 2006 Metropolitan Council City Council Planning Commission Community Forums Agencies Environmental Board, Park Board, EDAC Advisory Panel Technical Committee Phase 1 Information Gathering and Project Initiation April 2007 Phase 2 Goals & Policies June 2007 Phase 3 Alternatives Initiation with Met Council Staff • Initiation Meeting Project Initiation Meeting ..e Project Project Kick -off Initiation Initiation Meeting Workshop Kick -off Meeting Kick -off Meeting Kick -off Meeting AIL Mir Review Draft Goals and Policies Review Draft Goals and Policies Kick -off Meeting Initiation Meeting November 2007 Phase 4 Draft Plan May 2008 Phase 5 Agencies Review October 2008 Phase 6 Met Council Review and Final Draft Plan Check -in with Met Council AIL AM ■ Review Select Preferred Alternatives Alternative Recommend Preferred Alternative Met Council t Informal Review Alb Accept Draft Plan and Authorize Distribution Recommend Draft Plan Present Alternatives Check -in with agencies on alternatives Review Alternatives eview Dra Review Draft Goals and Goals and Policies Policies Pre - alternatives Exercise 0"0 eview Alternatives Review Review Background Goals and Report 1 Policies Review Alternatives Review Alternatives Review Draft Plan Review Draft Plan Review Draft Plan Review Draft Plan • Met Council Meetings and Plan Approval Adopt Contingent on Met Councli Review 'w"A 6 -month Review Period (Meetings as Necessory) Final Plan Recommend Approval Review Alternatives Preliminary Public Participation Process - Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update February 2007 Review Draft Plan Review Draft Plan Review Revisions Final Plan Adoption Implementation sl F DSU Bonestroo