Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/13/2007 P&Z Packet• • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, June 13, 2007 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 11, 2007 and May 9, 2007 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. Final Plat for a four lot residential subdivision to be called Golden Acre, 547 Lois Lane, Tim Anderson — Paul Bengtson B. PUBLIC HEARING for a Preliminary Plat for an eight lot residential subdivision to be called Grandview, 7330 Lake Drive, Royal Oaks Realty — Paul Bengtson VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Update on Comprehensive Plan VII. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4- minute limit • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice - Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT . MEMBERS ABSENT . STAFF PRESENT April 11, 2007: 6:33 P.M. 9:57 P.M. Michael Hyden, Perry Laden, Robert Nelson, Brian Pogalz (Vice Chair), Rob Rafferty, Paul Tralle (Chair); Michael Root; Perry Laden None Paul Bengtson, Jeff Smyser & Jim Studenski I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. on April 11, 2007. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 14, 2007 Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to approve the February 14, 2007 Minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 - 0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:35 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:36 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 5 - 0. V. ACTION ITEMS DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board April 11, 2007 Page 2 A. PUBLIC HEARING for a Rezone, Preliminary Plat, MUSA Allocation and Final Plat for a two lot residential subdivision to be called Cox Estates, 554 Lois Lane~ Brennan Cox Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. (Perry Laden arrived at 6:37 p.m.) Staff recommended approval subject to the seven conditions listed in the staff report. Mr. Brennan J. Cox, 554 Lois Lane, applicant, stated that he understands the requirements and agrees to follow the conditions as proposed. Mr. Tralle opened the Public Hearing at 6:41 p.m. Debra Podlasek, 7859 Country Lane, asked for clarity of the proposed plan. Ms. Podlasek wanted confirmation that there will only be one additional house and lot. She asked for the proposed location of the new house. Mr. Bengtson clarified that the house will be placed on the north side of the lot. Mr. Cox responded that he has no intention to remove trees on the site. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 6:45 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Rezone, Preliminary Plat, MUSA Allocation and Final Plat for Cox Estates subject to the following seven conditions of approval: 1. All lots in the plat, including the existing home, must agree to connect to City utilities. The City will not approve the final plat without legally enforceable assurance that all properties will connect and existing onsite septic systems will be appropriately abandoned. 2. Existing wells shall be capped when required by Minnesota Dept. of Health requirements. 3. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 4. A development agreement between the city and the developer must be executed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 5. Park dedication must be paid in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 6. The Rice Creek Watershed District must review the project prior to building permits being issued by the city for any new construction. 7. A boulevard tree shall be provided for each lot frontage. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board April 11, 2007 Page 3 • Mr. Rafferty recommended that staff consider increasing the width requirements of • • residential lots in the future. Motion carried 6 - 0. B. PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment for a building addition at Molin Concrete, 415 Lilac Street Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. He noted that the proposed site plan and building layout design had changed slightly since the staff report was written and that the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) had brought up some issues with the wetland mitigation enhancement area on the grading plan. He explained that Molin does not intend to build into this area now, and that the RCWD has not yet approved a permit for this addition. Mr. Bengtson noted that staff has visited the site regarding landscaping materials and Molin identified a stormwater outlet issue on the site that needs repair. Staff recommends continuation of this item to the next meeting so that Molin can further address the outstanding issues. Mr. Hyden asked about the status of the landscaping on the back berm. Mr. Bengtson replied that Mr. Asleson has checked the site and will visit the site again in the future to confirm that the landscaping is established to the city's satisfaction. Mr. Rafferty asked if staff follows up on items only when a new application on that particular site comes in, or are issues being checked up on. Rafferty stated that he would like Molin to address previous concerns prior to coming back for additional approvals. Mr. Bengtson remarked that Molin has worked with staff in the past to make sure landscape issues are being addressed. He explained that Molin has aggressively been growing and expanding recently, and therefore have been before the city more frequently. He noted that landscaping issues can only be addressed at certain times of the year. Mr. Rafferty clarified that he just wanted to make sure that they are not losing site of past issues and that staff is on top of things. Mr. Hyden explained that he brought up the landscaping issue because a number of residents were concerned about the berm and screening that was required in the past. Mr. Tralle asked if a continuation of the item would negatively affect Molin's timeline of the project. Mr. Tralle commented that he thought Molin has been doing a good job following up on issues. Randy Molin, facilities manager at Molin Conrete, was concerned about what issues the board members were referring to that were not addressed. Mr. Molin stated that very heavy rains hindered the completion of the berm area, and that they completed all plantings as soon as they could and city staff checked on the progress. He added that the City has checked every year to make sure that these areas are addressed. Mr. Molin stated he has worked with Mr. Asleson at the city to stay on top of things and it seems when they come before the board it happens to be a bad time of year to look at plantings. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board April 11, 2007 Page 4 Mr. Molin said that they have gone above and beyond the city's landscaping expectations and have ultimately included more plantings than were necessary. Mr. Rafferty thanked Mr. Molin for clarifying the issue for board members and citizens that they are meeting required conditions. Mr. Molin added that they increased the buffer zone by planting additional trees and that Rice Creek is very happy with what they have accomplished and have signed off on their stormwater management plan. Mr. Molin specified that they report quarterly to the MPCA regarding the stormwater culvert that is covered by a 1994 permit to discharge water and explained that the outlet was damaged due to heavy snowfall. Mr. Molin stated that they are working with Plowe Engineering to redesign the outlet to avoid this problem in the future. Mr. Molin explained that the request for additional office space is due to growing business. Mr. Molin stated that continuing this item would not be an issue for them. He said they plan to request a building permit in June. Mr. Nelson commented that Molin has been a great partner with the city and explained that the board has become very sensitive to resident complaints. Mr. Nelson stated that they are happy to have been educated on past issues. Mr. Tralle opened the Public Hearing 7:12 p.m. No one was present to speak. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to table the Public Hearing to the Planning & Zoning Board Meeting on May 9. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion passed 6 -0 C. PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit for earth material storage at 6644 20th Avenue, Royal Oaks Realty Mr. Studenski stated that the applicant had a family issue and was therefore unable to attend the meeting. Staff has confirmed with the applicant that the board will table tonight's action to next month's P &Z meeting. Mr. Studenski suggested that the board open the Public Hearing to get the concerns of the residents that were present. Mr. Studenski distributed copies of two petitions that were received by the city on Monday. He noted that the petition dated 4 -9 -07 stated concern of eight neighboring residents regarding the proposed project. He noted that the second petition was a historical petition dated March 3, 2005 from concerned residents opposed to additional truck traffic going down 20th Ave. The neighbors submitted this petition to show that they have been concerned about this issue for a long time. Mr. Studenski clarified for residents and the board that a Conditional Use Permit has not been approved for this project. He explained that the city is following the standard procedure for all Conditional Use Permit Requests: Neighboring residents were notified, concerns will be heard at the Public Hearing, the Planning & Zoning Board will make a DRAFT MINUTES • • • • Planning & Zoning Board April 11, 2007 Page 5 recommendation to the Council & ultimately the Council will make the fmal decision on the request for a CUP. Mr. Studenski presented the staff report. He clarified the location of the site and listed some of the 14 prerequisite conditions that are necessary for approval of a permit. He added that the applicant stated to the Environmental Board that the dirt pile will not exceed 7000 cubic yards. Mr. Studenski noted that the city increased the area of Public Notice to property owners within one quarter mile of the property in order to reach more residents. He stated that the request has been forwarded to the Anoka County Highway Department for review of two necessary permits for this application. Staff noted that the city is under a timeline to act on all applications, and that the deadline for this request is June 6. Therefore the Council would have to take action at the May 29 meeting, and because the item is being tabled, staff will send a letter to the applicant extending the deadline. Staff noted that the applicant will need to do a tree preservation plan or move the stockpile 50 feet away from existing trees on the site. Mr. Studenski added that the applicant stored the material on the site without prior approval, therefore the board will need to decide if this use fits the site. Staff stated that Anoka County has jurisdiction over the road, but the city must consider neighboring homes and traffic. Staff would like feedback from residents and board members prior to the next meeting. Board members discussed concerns about increased traffic accessing the site, the amount of material to be stored on the site, location of the berm, truck noise and - -- to nearby roads. They debated whether or not this was an appropriate use for the area. Mr. Studenski clarified that the number of allowable trips was generated by staff, and that one trip included driving in and out of the site. Mr. Smyser pointed out that this particular type of activity is not described within city ordinances. He noted that according to city ordinance, anyone can move earth, reclaim and dig holes in any zone. He stated that the city can regulate how much is moved and how it is done. Mr. Studenski stated that there is no specific route to be used to access the site and he does not see a need to limit an access route. He clarified that the city does not specifically restrict this use in any zone. Mr. Laden pointed out that if they approve the CUP they would be able to regulate the use through conditions, but without a CUP the applicant would have less regulated activity on the site. Mr. Tralle opened the P.H. at 8:05 p.m. Mr. John Pignato, 6709 20th Avenue, thanked Mr. Studenski for all of the work staff has done. He stated that in the past the traffic was rural and never before had semis at 60 mph. He said the residents were never notified of an increased weight limit to the road. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board April 11, 2007 Page 6 He stated that 60 trucks went by in an hour and that side loaders are going through there. He is seeing increased traffic. He was concerned about runoff. He hopes the P &Z Board denies this application. Ms. Patrice Carpenter 6748 20th Avenue, stated that a huge mountain of dirt is already there. She was concerned about pollution and trucks. She said her house is 400 feet from the road and she looks at a dirt pile from her dining room window. She believes the pile is currently in excess of 35 feet high. She has lived there for 20 some years and understands and can deal with change, however feels that a big pile of dirt in their back yard is unreasonable. She had concerns about erosion control. She wondered if there are guarantees that there were precautions taken prior to storing the dirt on the site. She is concerned about where the dirt came from, if it is clean or infested with insects, and if it had been tested, because they have nearby wells. She said that her property is the host to the main culvert and that any drainage is going south to the wetlands. Whatever is going north is going to back yards and to the culvert. She said that the drainage area is a natural drainage ditch going straight into the lakes and private wells. She stated that dirt and dust blow into her house through her open windows and feels like she is living in a dust bowl all summer. She said she is no longer able to dry her clothes outside. She said that there is a dusty haze when trucks are there and stated that the small fence that has been placed there cannot contain the dust from the huge mountain of dirt. Ms. Carpenter stated concern that nobody showed up for the meeting on behalf of the applicant. She was concerned about the amount of daily truck traffic. She wondered if someone could guarantee that pollution hasn't already been dumped there and if they could prove it. She urged the board to require that the existing dirt pile be removed. Julie McNeely, 6687 20th Ave S., stated that she lives three driveways north of site. She was grateful for the questions brought up this evening. She expressed concern of the sensory assault of truck traffic. She agreed that on a summer day she cannot open windows or hang wash out to dry. She stated that the sound of truck engines breaking is deafening to the ears. She stated that many neighbors have experienced cups vibrating on the tables due to their houses shaking. She asked that board members consider the sensory level issues as if it were their homes. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to table the Public Hearing to the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting on May 9. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Studenski asked for issues from the board that should be addressed. The majority of the board members stated that they would be inclined to deny the application because they feel the use is a business and is not compatible in this zone. Mr. Nelson suggested rezoning the property. Mr. Pogalz stated that the property is in a rural area and that farming is an allowable business. He pointed out that the property owner could farm the property which would cause dust, etc. as this does. He pointed out that the road will take a beating in the future when the area develops. He stated that the property owner pays a road tax and has the right to use the roads. He pointed out that if the RCWD sees an issue with erosion control, then they will not allow the use. He doesn't think the board can decide to deny a DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board April 11, 2007 Page 7 use because they don't like it. He believes there need to be controls over the use, but they need to allow it. Mr. Tralle thanked the residents for attending the Public Hearing. Mr. Tralle called a 10- minute recess at 8:27 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:37 p.m. D. Final Plat for Holiday Stationstores Lino Lakes First Addition at 7509 Lake Drive, Holiday Companies Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval of the final plat. Mr. Dave Edquist, 16771 Jacksonville Ct., Lakeville, MN, was present as representative of the project. He appreciated the board's review and hopes they recommend approval. Mr. Pogalz asked if they plan to add back the two gas pumps that were removed in the past. Mr. Edquist stated that they did request to add back the pumps to increase business. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Final Plat for the Holiday Stationstore at 7509 Lake Drive. Motion was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 - 0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Hardwood Creek Update Mr. Smyser presented the staff report, giving a background of the Hardwood Creek site and noting that no official application has been received. Staff is simply educating the board on the progress of plans for the site. Mr. Smyser explained the proposed process includes application for a PUD, which will include approval of the framework and basic parameters, open space and park land, and possibly a preliminary plat for the commercial area. He explained that individual development will come in by phases as it develops. Because the site is so large, the main elements will be approved first and individual development will be approved to fit into the area. Kendra Lindahl, Landform, stated that they hope to submit plans for preliminary plat in June, with a presentation at the council work session on May 7. Ms. Lindahl added that they will submit design guidelines with the PUD. They hope to get final approvals and start site grading in the fall with construction beginning next year, starting with commercial. She explained that Shingobee is no longer a partner, but United Properties has taken over the commercial piece and is working on potential users. She added that they do not have a residential developer at this time. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board April 11, 2007 Page 8 B. Comprehensive Plan Update Mr. Smyser summarized that the Advisory Panel met on April 4 and put together draft goals & policies. He said that a revised draft will go to the boards and EDAC for review and comment. He added that the document will not be brought to a P &Z Board Meeting since all P &Z members are on the Advisory Panel. Mr. Smyser stated that staff believed the meeting on the 4th was very productive. He noted that members of the panel recognized they all had different views and to make one thing happen means other things must then happen. Mr. Smyser asked board members for comments on the meeting or the process itself. Mr. Laden said that he left with a positive feeling that through this process, the Comp Plan will include a lot of resident input. Mr. Nelson commented that there was a good recognition that there is cause and effect with development. Mr. Rafferty found it positive that everyone seemed to be thinking about other people's opinions and addressing issues that might be of concern. The next meeting of the Advisory Panel is on April 18, 2007. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Root made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:57 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT : STAFF PRESENT May 9, 2007 6:31 P.M. 10.21 P.M. Michael Hyden, Perry Laden, Robert Nelson, Brian Pogalz (Vice Chair), Rob Rafferty, Paul Tralle (Chair); Michael Root None Paul Bengtson, Jeff Smyser & Jim Studenski I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. on May 9, 2007. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to table the approval of the April 11, 2007 Minutes to the meeting on June 13, 2007. Motion was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 - 0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:32 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Tralle closed Open Mike at 6:32 p.m. V. ACTION ITEMS A. Variance to the local street setback to allow for a covered porch addition at 8020 Danube Street, James Schally Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 2 Staff recommended approval of the variance request. The applicant, Mr. James Schally, was not present at the meeting. Board Members discussed the necessity of the roof and the intent of the porch. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Variance to the local street setback to allow for a covered porch addition at 8020 Danube Street. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 6 - 0. B. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit for earth material storage at 6644 20th Avenue, Royal Oaks Realty Mr. Studenski presented the staff report. Mr. Studenski stated that resident Julie McNeely, 6687 20th Ave., was unable to attend the meeting but asked staff to forward her comment to the board that she is against the proj ect. Staff stated their review was based on the 14 conditions of the Zoning Ordinance for Earth Moving and Land Reclamation. Staff reminded the board of the petitions against the project that were submitted at the April meeting. Mr. Studenski explained that the city had received a review from the Anoka County Highway Department earlier that day. He clarified that neither the county nor the city would require the additional 27 feet of right -of -way for this request. He stated that County comments included: moving the driveway as far to the north as possible, adding a culvert, and constructing north and south bound turn lanes and a bypass lane. The City contacted Anoka County after receiving the letter, and was informed by Randy Bettinger at Anoka County that road improvements will be required regardless of the number of trucks per day, but the required combination of lanes still needs to be determined. Mr. Studenski added that drainage calculations would be required to determine how drainage would affect the county road and that a Haul Permit is required by the county. Mr. Studenski explained that the deadline for this application is June 6, which requires action by the P &Z Board at this meeting. He added that the applicant did not see a rationale to extend the item. Mr. Studenski noted that the Rice Creek Watershed District does not require a permit, but will monitor the site. Mr. Studenski stated that the applicant had already addressed a number of issues and conditions since the previous meeting. Staff explained that the dirt pile had been moved to a location more than 50 feet away from any existing trees. The applicant submitted a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), filled the house foundation, abandoned the septic system, cleared and removed debris and objects from the site, added a fenced barricade to the driveway entrance, and added a dirt berm to the northern access. Staff recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to the 13 conditions listed in the staff report. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 3 Mr. Nelson referred to Condition No. 12, and asked what would happen if the county decided to allow a variance that the city did not agree with. Staff replied that the county will have their own requirements. Mr. Studenski stated that the city could amend the conditions of approval to address this. Staff confirmed that the existing stockpile is currently 22 - 24 feet high. Mr. Pogalz asked why the trips per day were reduced from 50 to 25 trips per day. Staff said they had reduced the number in response to resident and Planning and Zoning Board Member concerns. Mr. Laden pointed out that the ordinance requires that an applicant specify a completion date, and asked if a completion date had been addressed. Mr. Studenski replied that development is anticipated on the site in the near future and, due to the limited amount of activity that will occur, staff had not requested a specific completion date. Staff noted that the board could recommend a deadline date, but that all CUPs are reviewed annually. Applicant, Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, 1000 County Road E, Suite 150, Shoreview, MN, reiterated that the zoning ordinance allows this use in any zoning district. He stated that conditions are required for a CUP in order to make the use compatible with neighboring properties. Mr. Black described that Royal Oaks Realty is a land development company, Royal Excavating is their sister company, and Imperial Homes is the home building company and they all work together. He explained the intent of their request is to stockpile dirt for their own company and that dirt will not be sold to other companies. He said they presume that some weeks there may be no trucks accessing the site, and explained that they will access the stockpile when there is fmal grade work being done. He noted that they never intended to be hauling material in and out on a daily basis, and only when there is a bigger job would they possibly meet the maximum trips per day. He thanked the board members that were able to visit the site. He stated that they have tried to meet a number of staffs recommendations since the last P &Z meeting, and they should not have a problem adhering to staff s conditions of approval. He stated that he spoke with Randy Bettinger of Anoka County earlier that day regarding the county review. He was told by Mr. Bettinger that the County is offering comments, but not necessarily requirements. He said Mr. Bettinger stated that the county does not require the road improvements. Mr. Black spoke of the possibility of moving the entrance. He said he is concerned about the road recommendations, but added that Mr. Bettinger told him that if the city does not require this, then the county does not require it. He would like an opportunity to discuss the county's recommendations with city staff and the county. Mr. Nelson commented that he believes that the term grading means a one -time earth moving. • Mr. Laden believes the intent of the ordinance is for a temporary use, and that a fmal grading plan and a project completion date are required. Mr. Black stated that the property is guided for medium density residential and that they hope to develop in two to five years or sooner. He explained that once there is a DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 4 development application, the use will stop. He added that they would not go through with the application if the county required the turn lane changes. Mr. Laden said he believes that to allow storage means something will be stored and will stay there. Mr. Black informed the board that the majority of the dirt came from Centerville and that only black dirt will be stored on the site. Mr. Rafferty asked Mr. Black to consider how he would feel if he were a neighbor. Mr. Black reminded the board that this would be a conditional use in which staff can apply conditions in order for the property owner to use the property in a certain way. Mr. Black reiterated that dump trucks will not be accessing the site every day and he feels a cap of 25 trips per day is feasible. He estimated, on average, possibly 10 trips per day once a week would access the site. Mr. Nelson suggested limiting the number of trips per day to a monthly threshold instead of a daily threshold. Chair Tralle opened the Public Hearing at 7:27 p.m. Mrs. Patrice Carpenter, 6748 20th Ave., said she stated concerns at the last meeting. She said the applicant has been a good neighbor and has been making a lot of improvements. Her concern is that he didn't get permission prior to the stockpile placement and movement. She is concerned about the issue of the turning lanes and that moving the driveway north would be a lot closer to her. She said there is a blind hill heading north on 20th, so if they moved the driveway to the north then turn lanes would be necessary. She stated there is no need for turn lanes if the driveway stays in its current location. She understands the site is rural and she is used to dirt, but doesn't know when the dirt will be flying around. She feels there is no way to vegetate anything with all of the earth movement. She does not feel the height of the dirt pile makes a difference. She informed the board that flying dirt is a nuisance. She was relieved to hear the dirt came from Centerville. She said she would really not like the use here and would have liked it more if the applicant had asked permission prior to them doing it. Mrs. Carpenter recommended that the board not approve the request and asked that the pile of dirt be moved. John Pignato, 6709 20th Ave. S., stated that there are no turn lanes in Centerville, and that all kinds of traffic is going there now, just not so many dump trucks. He said they have been putting up with semi - trucks and earth moving equipment for a long time because of new businesses in Centerville, noting this is just another straw in the camel's back. He feels that they will be accessing the site more often than Mr. Black has suggested. He stated that dirt is blowing and there is mud on the road. He stated that he is against the application and hopes the board denies it. Mr. Tralle asked Mr. Black to address some of the concerns. • • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 5 Mr. Black said that they will Hydro -seed the stockpile to establish vegetation and reseed as necessary. He added that they have a truck for watering and they will sweep as needed to clean and maintain the road. He said they do not have a problem with a gravel driveway as it is almost there by now. He anticipates they will be moving the dirt small sections at a time. He is willing to create a new driveway to within 30 feet of the property line if it is required. He added, however, that trees there currently act as a buffer, so if the drive is relocated north of the trees the buffer will be lost. Mr. Nelson suggested the possibility of adding a stipulation for use at three to four years and capping the allowable trips per month. Mr. Black said that sounded reasonable, but was not sure if the attorney would agree with adding a completion date. Mr. Black said he understands they are trying to find thresholds of compatibility. He reiterated that the use is not intended, and was never intended, to be a constant moving activity, but simply supplemental material available for nearby construction sites as need be. He asked the board to consider a one year allowance to prove that it will be a compatible use with the neighborhood. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 7:47 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 - 0. Mr. Pogalz reiterated his comments from the last board meeting. He stated that the property is zoned rural, which allows more flexibility to the property owner. He added that it could be a lot worse if the property was used for farming. He pointed out the this sounded like an example of NIMBY — Not In My Back Yard, which means that residents are okay with things as long as it's not in their back yard. He added that turn lanes sound okay because the county may require them with development. He suggested they look at this use as a distribution center somewhat like Schwan's. He feels they are putting good limits on a use. He noted that normal construction operations happen as areas develop. He added that the use would go away in a few years as the land would be more valuable with homes rather than dirt on it. He stated he is in favor of approving the CUP. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit for earth material storage at 6644 20th Avenue. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. The following role call vote was taken, Nelson: No, Root: Yes, Rafferty: Yes, Hyden: No, Pogalz: No, Laden: Yes, Tralle: Yes. Motion carried 4 -3. Mr. Studenski asked for the board's rationale for denial, which he stated is necessary when an application is forwarded with a recommendation for denial. Mr. Root stated the use is too intense for the roads and a nuisance for the neighbors. Mr. Rafferty believes this use is not what the ordinance intended. • Mr. Tralle does not agree that there is no end in site, he is disturbed that they did not ask permission prior to use, and he does not feel they can monitor the amount of traffic. Mr. Laden stated it does not meet ordinance requirements without an end date. He considers it to be an off -site delivery business that would not be allowed in a rural zone. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 6 Mr. Nelson suggested putting a new motion on the table to include a completion date for the use. Mr. Tralle stated that a motion had already been passed for the application. The board took a 10- minute recess at 7:57 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:08 p.m. C. PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit for earth material excavation and storage at 6497 12th Avenue, A.I.T. Mr. Studenski presented the staff report. He added that Anoka County does not require any permits for activity from this site as the site does not directly access onto a county road. He stated the deadline for this application is June 7, so the City Council would have to take action at the May 19 meeting. Therefore, the board would have to take action at this meeting to meet the time frame. Mr. Studenski described the site layout per the exhibits included in the staff report. He noted that they will only access the westernmost pile across the ditch if it becomes necessary to obtain the required amount of fill. Mr. Studenski said that the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) has not taken action on the project at this time. He said the applicant does not intend to move any trees on either site. He explained that the activity going in and out of The Preserve site will be intense at some time regardless of where the dirt comes from. He added that this is possibly the shortest truck route possible to the site. Mr. Studenski reviewed the conditions of approval that staff suggested for this application. He added that Condition 15 will be changed to read that no permits are required by Anoka County. Mr. Studenski stated that the ponds will be monitored to discharge water prior to reaching the ditch. He does not anticipate issues and added that the city and RCWD will monitor the flow. Mr. Studenski said that pumps will run continually in order to work effectively. Board members discussed the possibility of using flags and limiting the speed of trucks in order to help with traffic flow. Staff stated that traffic activity on Birch St. will be monitored and that flagging will be required if determined to be necessary for safety. Board members discussed the proposed ponding areas, including slopes, pond depths and vegetation. Mr. Studenskin explained that the applicant will vegetate according to city specifications. He said that one pond will be very shallow and the one to the west of the house will be 18 -20 feet below the water table. He noted that the smallest pond is the least desirable and most expensive to excavate, therefore the specific process of excavation will be determined by the contractor. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 7 Board members wondered why the ponds did not include a bench for safety reasons. Mr. Studenski explained that the applicant is not creating any water storage areas and the ponds will not be designed to be long -term. Mr. Studenski informed the board that caution signs are typical with development, and signs will be placed along Birch St. so it is not necessary to include this as a condition. Applicant, Mr. Brian Bourassa, MFRA Engineering, Plymouth, MN, and Adam Parker, hydrologist, answered questions for the board. Mr. Bourassa stated that berms around the dewatering equipment would be a great idea. He explained that the material they are going after is sandy material for building roads and house pads, and they will need an estimated 50,000 to 60,000 cubic yards for The Preserve site. Mr. Bourassa said he lives in the area and is aware that traffic is difficult. He likes the idea of warning signs on Birch St. and 12th Ave, and is open to staffs recommendations regarding flagging. Mr. Bourassa showed the board members the location of the temporary storage on the site. He noted that the Environmental Board had suggested a specific seed mix for vegetation, and he will work with Marty Asleson at the City. He said he didn't show a bench because there is no development plan there, but realizes at some time a bench will probably be required. He noted that the water level in the ponds is estimated to remain what it is today. He said they do not anticipate accessing the third excavation site. He described that if they use six to eight 12 -yard trucks to haul the estimated 50,000 cubic yards of dirt during haul hours, it would take 13 days if everything ran perfectly. Realistically, they estimate it will take four to six weeks to haul the dirt for The Preserve. Mr. Parker explained to the board the dewatering process that will be used on the site. He explained that a number of engineers on staff will help determine the best vegetation and will follow the city's recommendations. He explained that SWPPPs will limit dust and keep topsoil in place. Board members expressed concern about water levels, safety of the excavation site and street clean-up and maintenance. Mr. Parker remarked that the vegetation used will be selected to handle the water levels, with only three to four foot fluctuations expected. Mr. Bourassa added that there will be no discharge from these basins and expects there to be less water or the same as there is today. Mr. Bourassa stated that silt or snow fencing will be used for safety. He explained that they are proposing a rock trench entrance to knock dirt off the wheels, a silt fence to prevent erosion from the pile, and will comply with requirements regarding street sweeping. Mr. Pogalz pointed out that the application is for an expected use of 90,000 cubic yards, with 50,000 going to The Preserve. He asked if the excess material will be sold to another developer or development and why they should allow him to take the material off site. He asked why they couldn't just take the 50,000 to 60,000 for The Preserve. Mr. Bourassa replied that the purpose is to haul the excess material to a different site. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 8 Mr. Bourassa suggested the board could but a sunset period on when the site needs to be cleaned up. He went on to say if there is a market for the material, and they think there is, they propose to sell it. Mr. Pogalz pointed out that a timeline of four to six weeks is expected for The Preserve, with an extra four to six weeks to access additional sites. Mr. Bourassa clarified that additional trucks may be used for the other sites. Mr. Tralle stated that if they are going to have to put in a bench eventually, then it should just go in now. He asked what the restoration plan is for the area. Mr. Bourassa replied that the property owners, the Lamottes, see the ponds as a buffer to the future growth area. Mr. Tralle asked what the estimated truck traffic would be on a normal day. Mr. Bourassa replied that they expected six to eight trucks to haul all day long for roughly four to five weeks. Mr. Tralle opened the Public Hearing 9:06 p.m. Bill Combs, 6496 N. Trappers Crossing, said his property is on the corner lot directly behind the large stockpile site. He was concerned about safety issues. He said he has young boys and a dog that play on the Lamotte property and he is not convinced of safety with the proposed silt and storm fencing. He was concerned about how close to his property line the pond would be and how big it would get. He was concerned for the safety of his children and other children. Mr. Bourassa responded that the start of the grade is maybe 10 -15 feet north of property line. He anticipated water elevation to be maybe 120 feet north of his back property line. Joe Knudsen, 6525 White Oak Rd., stated concerns about trucks exiting on 12th Ave. and asked how close to the road the proposed stockpile would be. He was concerned it would be near development. Mr. Bourassa explained that the temporary stockpile of sand and dirt would be stored north of the trees and west of 12th Ave. Mr. Knudsen also expressed concern about the number of trucks and truckloads that would be used. Mr. Pogalz estimated that in a ten -hour day, approximately 240 truckloads could be hauled per day for 28 days. Mr. Knudsen stated concern for damage that may be done to the road. Mr. Studenski replied that they applicant would be required to replace any damage in kind with what is there now. Tim Renslow, 6586 Pheasant Run South, requested a confirmation of the proposed truck route. Mr. Bourassa explained the route to be used. Mr. Renslow added his concerns included dust, noise, and safety for children. He was very concerned that many of the families in the area have small children that may get hurt. Mr. Tralle replied that they are not disregarding the issues. DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 9 Mr. Renslow added that he is concerned about the condition of Pheasant Run S. Mr. Tralle responded that they can reduce truck speed and the applicant will clean the roads on a daily basis. Mr. Pogalz explained that Pheasant Run S. will see just as much traffic regardless of where the dirt will come from as it has to come from somewhere. He added it is probably better that it come from a nearby site as it would happen faster. Ben Peterson, 6441 Royal Pines Place, stated his property is directly south of the southern property line. Mr. Peterson requested that they put the snow fence around the entire property. He asked how many backhoes and diggers would be used and if they would be using bobcats. He wondered how many water pumps would be used. He wondered once they start digging dirt out of the ponds, how long will it take to dry until it can be hauled away. He asked how lon the project would actually last. He stated he has concerns about traffic, especially on 12m Ave. He noted that the property owner has planted great trees on the property and wondered if he could line the southern property line with trees, adding that he would be willing to help out if needed. Mr. Bourassa believes the operation will consist of one backhoe and one dozer accessing one pond at a time. He does not anticipate the use of bobcats, but one front endloader may be used. He estimated that one pump at a time will be used for dewatering. He stated that they propose to place silt or snow fence around excavation areas as shown on the plan for safety measures. Mr. Tralle pointed out there is a wetland area between Mr. Peterson's house and the excavation area. Mr. Peterson added that an increase of trucks might add curiosity to kids and he is concerned about their safety. Shari Livingston, 6574 Pheasant Run South, and father Larry Stinksy, stated concerns about the amount of truck traffic on Pheasant Run S. He stated there is a park where the truck traffic will be going through. He is especially concerned about times when kids are coming home from school or accessing the park. He added that cars always parked on the street, making it a hazard. He distibuted photos to the board of standing water in the drainage ditch behind the house, adding that the photos were taken after one day of heavy rain. Rick Reibel, 6535 Pheasant Run South, was concerned about the safety of children. He doesn't believe the lanes are very wide on the road, and with community sports there are often kids on the street by the park and riding bikes. He pointed out that their neighborhood includes diverse neighbors that may have issues with understanding signs. He was concerned about the environmental impact of the surface water drainage system. He stated concern about high water levels on Black Duck Drive to the north. He would like to see an independent report of the environmental water impact table, stating that they should be able to provide numbers with a hydrologist on board. He is concerned about cranes and Canadian Geese that nest in the drain field each year. He has concerns DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 10 about drinking water, heavy loaders possibly degrading Pheasant Run, vibration, and if there are contingency plans for operating damages. Mr. Studenski stated that any activity adversely affecting neighbors is the responsibility of the applicant. He added that the city will monitor truck traffic, and if issues occur they will be addressed. Mr. Hyden reiterated that the RCWD is involved in monitoring this project. Mr. Parker addressed hydrology questions. He explained that the DNR is the authority and they will work closely with them. He said that runoff will go through other wetlands before reaching the ditch. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 9:38 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 6 — 0. Mr. Laden said he was concerned about the truck traffic being allowed next to a city park during hours when activities are occurring with children and on -street parking. That's where he sees greatest danger. He proposed limiting or eliminating truck traffic during evening hours. Board Members agreed to amend Condition No. 12 to read Monday — Friday 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Mr. Rafferty said he is concerned about city streets but is not sure they can contain people from development that is already approved. Mr. Rafferty suggested adding a condition to reduce the speed of trucks to 20 mph. Board Members agreed to add Condition No. 18 to say that trucks will be limited to a maximum speed of 20 mph. Board Members agreed to add Condition No. 19 to say that the city will monitor traffic and define traffic signage to include the necessary use of flagmen and hauling signage at the contractor's expense. Mr. Studenski confirmed that neighbors would be notified of work to be done and that a neighborhood meeting would be held. After discussion about the silt/snow fencing, Mr. Bourassa agreed to use snow fence instead of silt fence, and to continue the fence southward until it reaches the wooded area. Mr. Pogalz specified that the board is considering a CUP for excavation, storage and transporting of material and asked if anyone could explain the difference between this application and the Royal Oaks Realty application that was previously denied. Mr. Studenski stated that both applications consist of on -site material being taken off site, and the differences include the site of destination, what is to be removed, the time frame and the restoration plan. Staff reminded the board that with this application, the use will not continue on indefinitely, they know that this will be a concentrated effort once activity is DRAFT MINUTES • • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 11 started, and they will not have random material coming in and out for an undetermined time frame. Mr. Pogalz stressed that the same restrictions should be applied to this site as were proposed for the other site. He does not see enough of a difference in applications to vary the conditions for daily watering, erosion control, fencing, and vegetation within 24 hours. He asked board members for feedback. Mr. Tralle pointed out that this application is different because the applicant came before the board legitimately before starting activity, the dirt is being used in Lino Lakes, and the use has an end date. Mr. Studenski added that this is a concentrated effort in that when they are doing the excavation it will be continually hauled off the site. Mr. Tralle stated that the board will no longer speak of the Royal Oaks Realty request because that is a separate application that the board already took action on. Mr. Studenski clarified that there will be a time that the topsoil will be at the storage site, which will be part of the SWPPP. • Board Members agreed to add Condition No. 20 to say that the stockpile area will be limited to a maximum height of 25 feet. Board Members agreed to add Condition No. 21 to say that areas that will not be worked on within 48 hours are required to be hydro- seeded. Mr. Nelson pointed out that 50,000 cubic yards of material will remain local, while 40,000 cubic yards will go offsite, which makes the use more like a distribution center with an excessive number of trucks. He was concerned that the hauling of the extra 50,000 cubic yards will go on for five to seven months in a residential area, while they were previously concerned about a rural area. Mr. Laden reiterated the biggest difference is this application has an end date. Board members pointed out the similarities between this application and the application that was previously denied under Item 5B, however the majority of board members agreed that enough differences were merited. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for earth material excavation and storage at 6497 12th Avenue based on the following conditions of approval: 1. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The SWPPP must contain the name and a 24 -hour telephone number of the responsible manager of the SWPPP. All references to MNDOT seed mix must be changed to the City native seed mix. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 12 2. Silt fence must be added around the excavation for safety reasons. 3. Properly fence and barricade entrances to prevent the general public from depositing garbage or refuse. 4. Must provide a tree preservation plan or limit excavation of material to a minimum of 50 feet from any trees. 4. All truck hauling activity must exit the site on 12th Avenue South and go north to Birch Street. 5. All City streets where hauling activity occurs will be video taped previous to excavation commencing at the site. The applicant will be responsible for repairing any damage to City streets caused by the hauling activity. 6. Previous to any activity on the site the applicant will be required to hold a neighborhood meeting to notify affected property owners along the haul route and within one - quarter of a mile of the site. 7. Maximum slope on any excavation shall be a 1 to 1 and in such condition as not to be dangerous because of sliding or caving side slopes. 8. Only topsoil will be allowed to be brought into the site. 9. A rock trench entrance shall be installed and maintained at all times. 10. Dust and wind erosion must be confined to the site and be controlled by watering the driveway as necessary. 11. Street sweeping shall occur as necessary. 12. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours set as follows: Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed 13. Reimburse the City for the cost of periodic inspections by the City for the purpose of determining that the terms under which the permit has been issued are being complied with. 14. Post a form of security to the City, conditioned to pay the City the cost and expense of repairing or cleaning any highways, streets, or other public ways within the City made necessary by the special burden resulting from transporting thereon by the applicant material to or from the site, the amount of such cost to be determined by the Council; and conditioned further to comply with all the requirements of this Ordinance and the particular permit, and to save the City free and harmless from all suits or claims for damages resulting from the negligent excavation, removal, DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 13 storage, or filling of rock, sand, dirt, gravel, clay, or other like material within the City. 15. No permits are required by Anoka County. 16. Permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District must be submitted to the City prior to any activity. All activities on the site must comply with the Rice Creek Watershed District requirements. 17. All excavation, erosion and sedimentation control, final site grading, and restoration shall be completed by November 1, 2007. 18. Trucks will be limited to a maximum speed of 20 mph. 19. The City will monitor traffic and define traffic signage to include the necessary use of flagmen and hauling signage at the contractor's expense. 20. The stockpile area will be limited to a maximum of 25 feet high. 21. Areas that will not be worked on within 48 hours are required to be hydro - seeded. • Motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 5 - 1. (Pogalz voting No) D. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment for a building addition at 415 Lilac Street, Molin Concrete Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. He noted that since the last meeting the applicant has submitted revised plans regarding details to the office footprint and showing the wetland enhancement area as a second phase. Staff recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment subject to the seven conditions listed in the staff report. Applicant, Randy Molin, Molin Concrete, stated that they have met all previous landscaping requirements. Mr. Tralle reopened the Public Hearing at 10:18 p.m. There was no one present to speak. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 10:19 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Rafferty. Motion carried 6 - 0. Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit Amendment for a building addition at 415 Lilac Street. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 6 - 0. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board May 9, 2007 Page 14 VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Comprehensive Plan Update Mr. Smyser summarized that the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel met on April 18 to review the draft goals and strategies. He said that the draft was reviewed by the Environmental Board and the Park Board, and will go to EDAC at their Thursday meeting. He said that comments will be brought to the next Advisory Panel Meeting on May 16 and a draft will go to the first Council Work Session in June. He added that they are running on the original schedule and asked for comments from the Board. Mr. Laden said he thought the meeting on April 18 was particularly productive. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 10:21 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 - 0. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant DRAFT MINUTES • • • • AGENDA ITEM 5.A. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: June 13, 2007 TOPIC: Final Plat Golden Acre BACKGROUND Tim Anderson has applied for a final plat for his property at 547 Lois Lane for the four lot residential subdivision entitled Golden Acre. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat, MUSA allocation, and Variances on November 13, 2006. ANALYSIS The final plat generally conforms to the Preliminary Plat which was approved by the City Council on March 12th with Resolution 06 -181. The final plat and title commitments have been forwarded to the city attorney for review and with the submittal of `consent to plat' from a lien holder, they were found to be acceptable. The conditions of approval from Resolution 06 -181 are being addressed with the final plat document; the approval received from the Rice Creek Watershed on May 15, 2007, the development agreement, and will continue to be addressed through the building permit process. The final plat as submitted addresses all of the platting conditions of Resolution 06 -181; the city has received a copy of the Rice Creek Watershed approval; and the rest of the conditions are being addressed with the Development Agreement and Building Permit process. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat. • ATTACHMENTS Golden Acre Final Plat received May 11, 2007 • • • GOLDEN ACRE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Ten Anderson, a angle person, fee owner, of the following desa6 ed property situated in the State of Minnesota. County of Anoka to wit Lot 4 Block 1, MAR DON ACRES, Anoka County, Minnesota Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as GOLDEN ACRE and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the Lane and also dedicate the easements as shown an the plat far drainage and utility purposes only. in witness whereof sold. Tim Anderson, has hereunto set his hand this day of 200— Tin Anderson STATE OF YIONESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a single person. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires day of 200_ by Ton Anderson, I Ronald P. Ahein, hereby certify that 1 have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as GOWE N ACRE, that this plat is a correct repreaentotion of the survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundrndOq of a foot, that all monuments w{1 be correctly placed in the ground as shown. that the outside boundary tines are correctly designated on the plat, and that there are no wet lands as defined in MGrnrlesota Statutes Section 505.02 Sobel. 1 or pubtie otter than as shown on this Pte- Ronald P. AMin, Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 17765 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z/ L12.. day of P21 L 200.1- by Ronald P. Akakn, Lad Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 17765. C.� E4Ar3EY County. Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 2010 This pick of GOLDEN ACRE woe approved by the City of Lino Lakes, I1.n esota at a regular meeting thereof held this _ day of 200— and if applicable, the written comments and reeamnendafians of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County H6ghway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed wlthout receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Itinnesoto Statutes, Sedan 505.03, Subd. 2 By Mayor BY Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR This plat has been decked and approved this day of 200_. By � or TYPICAL E.93F_MEIVIS: TYPICAL DRAINAGE & UTBfTY EASOSENT STREET moo - .00- VARIABLE -1 L r _.10.00 � 5.00 V VARIABLE L.-- - -- I REAR LINE } BEM 10 FEET N *TM ADORING STREET LRES. AND 5 FEET N 11011 000 AMMO SIDE LOT HIES AID REAR WE EASEMENTS ATE REFLECTED ON ORARID UNLESS MOROSE 51101 ale VIE PLAT. r. 1 I 1 1 r- r. 1 1 1 r. ,. I1 1 r. I- 1 1 I f- 1-a 11 1 1• I 11‘.11 1 ■ L/ LT `/ 6_ L./ 1 1-_ L_ 1 .. I 1 1 Lam: . / Ily R A R L O LANE R NORTH LIE CF B DON LOCK 1. DAR o AOIES --, 't 688'27'24'E 185.00 \� ,i ARLO LANE 56 P271rE .. 165.00 o �^ 2 sr —15 3 sf 3 Ft 62.50 4 2 sr- J5 51_ 0 77.50 0 Mir 27'24e3 ' -THE SOUTH UK OF MDT 4, BLOCK 1. MAR DON ACRES • r. VI I1 F I'1 1i ;,1 I L. 87.50 0 —is S0T2X24 E ,- 00A11EA ME TLIIY 1 ?' -15 87.50 185.00 LANE -J5 Iv r Is :A O ) CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA SECTION 8, T31, R22 GRAPHIC SCALE w AI IP o 0 (>IPwa) l deb 4. 90 R LOCATION MAP NOT To SCALE SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. LEGE: D O DENOTES 1,,2 NCH BY 14 NCH RON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED NY ULE161: N0. 17705, 1NAT MILL BE SET 001101 ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING OF 1)65 PLAT. • DENOTES FOUND M ONIAAI 41 FOR 11E PUITOSES OF WS PLAT HE SOLON HIE OF LOT 4, BLOCH 1. WAR DON ACRES 6 A55L1ED 10 HAYS A MARRO CF 1EIT2T24w. MAY 14 2007 o LAKEs MLSE rr4 TANA wtleeees i F aora ars stain zihr∎ • * .i STET 1 OF 1 • AGENDA ITEM 5.B. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P &Z MEETING DATE: June 13, 2007 TOPIC: Public Hearing: Grandview Preliminary Plat BACKGROUND Royal Oaks Realty has requested approval of an 8 lot residential subdivision to be known as Grandview. The subject site includes the outlot east of Gethsemane Church, and the parcel occupied by the parsonage house. The parsonage house lot and the previously granted roadway easement that would connect the Shores of Marshan Lake and Marshan Meadows subdivisions via Stage Coach Trail will both be slightly altered to allow the development of 8 total lots while still meeting all zoning ordinance requirements. ANALYSIS • The following is a summary of the proposal: • Site Area 3.76 acres Net Acreage 3.67 acres Total Lots 8 Gross Density 2.13 units /acre Net Density 2.18 units /acre Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) North Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -2 (Two Family Residential) South Residential Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) East Marshan Lake N/A N/A West House of Worship Public / Semi - Public R -3 (Medium Density Residential) Growth Management, MUSA Reserve: The subject site is currently located within the MUSA boundary area. Growth Management, Units/Year: The table attached to this report shows the status of the staging plans for final platting of new residential units. The seven new units of Grandview would fit within the policy of 147 per year and so could be final platted immediately. • Preliminary Plat Shoreland Ordinance: The subject site is adjacent to Marshan Lake, which is considered a Natural Environment Lake and therefore is subject to the more restrictive Shoreland Ordinance Requirements for Lot Dimensions, Impervious Surface Coverage, and Setbacks as listed below: Lot Area Lot Width Impervious Surface Coverage Setback from OHWL Abutting Non - Abutting Abutting Non - Abutting 20000 10800 80 80 30% 150 feet Lots: The lots will vary in depth from 135 feet to 260 feet (along the shoreline), and the widths will range from 80 feet to 86 feet. The lots located along Marshan Lake exceed the shoreland ordinance required 20,000 square feet of upland, and the western lots all exceed the 10,800 square foot R -1 requirement. The parsonage lot will be reduced in size to allow the other three lots west of the proposed street to meet all subdivision standards. Setbacks: The submitted plans depict all required setbacks, including the 150 foot setback from the Ordinary High Water Line as required by the Shoreland Ordinance. This setback is measured to any improvement attached to the single family dwelling, including decks and/or patios. This means that the northeast lot (indicated as Lot 1, Block 2) will be very limited in that regard. Impervious Surface Coverage: The lots will all be required to comply with the 30% • Impervious Surface Coverage requirement of the Shoreland Ordinance as they develop. • Streets: Stage Coach Trail will extend from the southern border to the northern border connecting The Shores of Marshan Lake and Marshan Meadows. The alignment of the street is proposed to vary slightly from the current easement granted by the church. This was necessitated by the requirement to provide 20,000 square feet of upland for each lot along the shoreline and will allow a seamless connection with the existing rights of way on either side of the project. This proposal will require the approval of an easement vacation that will need to accompany the final plat to the City Council. Conservation Easement: A Conservation Easement was supplied by the developer for Marshan Meadows and it is the city's intention to have this continued along the rest of Marshan Lake with any new development. Several rare species may exist in the area: Forsters' tern, a water nesting bird, and Blanding's turtle; which are on the threatened and endangered species lists. The conservation easement coincides with the drainage and utility easements required by the subdivision ordinance, both being 10 feet beyond the wetland edge. The conservation easement will include additional restrictions such as no mowing or dumping of clippings. There should also be a special packet of educational information supplied to homeowners and monuments at the easement boundary of all lake lots. Park Dedication: The current subdivision ordinance includes park dedication in the amount of $2075 per residential unit, less any land dedication. There is no land dedication needed, as Marshan Park is nearby. IDUtilities: Sanitary sewer and water are stubbed to the property line on both the north and the south. The appropriate easements are platted for the connection of the church to the services that will be constructed as part of this plat. These and other issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. Grading: The grading plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments will need to be addressed to his satisfaction prior to the site being developed. Environmental Board The Environmental Board reviewed the application on May 30th, there recommendations are attached. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of this request, subject to the following conditions: 1. All lots in the plat must agree to connect to City utilities. The City will not approve the final plat without legally enforceable assurance that all properties will connect. 2. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 3. A development agreement between the city and the developer must be executed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 4. Park dedication must be paid in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 5. A conservation easement shall be granted over the drainage and utility easement within the lots fronting Marshan Lake. Easement restrictions shall be defined prior to city council approval of the final plat. 6. The Rice Creek Watershed District must review the project prior to building permits being issued by the city for any new construction. 7. A boulevard tree shall be provided for each lot frontage. 8. The existing roadway easement shall be vacated by the City Council prior to the approval of the final plat. This review is based on the following plans and information: City Engineer Comments dated June 8, 2007 Enivronmental Board Comments from May 30, 2007 Grandview Plan Packet received May 14, 2007 • • • LOTS /UNITS Development Name approved prelim. plats as of January 16, 2007 Prelim Plat Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final .fatted year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2003 -09 total maximum 1029 Stoneybrook 103 51 0 2nd Addn 0 52 52 Century Farms North 249 56 65 52 43 33 249 Keefe: prel plat, not final plat 1 1 1 Morton (minor subdiv) 0 1 0 1 Ravens Hollow 56 0 56 56 Haley Manor 10 10 0 10 Crystal Cove 3 3 0 3 Millers Crossroads 152 22 47 51 32 152 Lakeview Estates 2 2 2 Snell (minor subdivision) 0 1 1 Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th 1 1 1 Justin's Preserve 1 1 1 Marshan Estates 4 4 4 Rice Creek Church duplex 2 2 2 Oakwood View 10 10 10 Junes Addn 2 2 2 Highland Meadows East 2nd 18 18 18 Marshan Townhomes 2nd 23 23 Pheasant Hills 12th island 8 8 8 West Shadow Ponds 2nd 1 1 1 Vaughan Addition 5 5 5 Angie's Acres (1 new) 1 1 1 Marshan Lakeview (2 new) 2 2 2 Marshan Meadows 20 20 20 Pine Glen 72 40 32 72 Cavegn (1 new lot) 1 1 1 Golden Acre (3 new lots) 3 3 3 Fran's Estate (1 new lot) 1 1 Cox Estates 1 1 Proposed: Grandview 7 7 total 51 148 176 171 141 74 709 remaining of annual 147 remaining of 1029 units for pre - 2010 -1 -29 -24 6 73 147 147 320 • C 1 T Y «��`jVySr.,s�, O F RN()L KES Memorandum DATE: June 8, 2007 TO: Paul Bengston FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Grandview Attached is a TKDA review dated June 8, 2007 for the Grandview Project. The attached review lists significant issues that must be addressed prior to preliminary plat approval. A copy of this review has been sent to Mike Black at Royal Oaks Realty. • Contact me with any questions, thank you. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Grandview Copies To: Site Review - Preliminary Plat City of Lino Lakes, lyfinnesota From: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Proj. No.: 13810.004 Date: June 8, 2007 Routing: The following review is based on these submittals: 1. Grandview, Aerial View, Resource Inventory and Certificate of Survey, Preliminary Plat, Grading Plan, Utility Plan, and SWPPP submitted by E. G. Rud and Sons, Inc., received by the City of Lino Lakes May 14, 2007. Significant issues with the project to be addressed prior to Preliminary Plat approval. 1. Please see the attached Drainage Review; there are a number of items that need to be addressed prior to Preliminary Plat approval. Items to be addressed prior to final approval: 1. The Public Works Department should verify that the hydrant at the end of the 6 inch line near the Parsonage is suitable to be salvaged and reinstalled. 2. The 6 inch sewer stub to the church should have the clean -out removed and a manhole added at the west end of the pipe. 3. The existing Utility Easement on Lot 14 in Marshan Meadows should be shown on the Plan. 4. Plans must reference City standards and details for any work to be completed in right -of -way. 5. Existing sanitary sewer and water services to the parsonage should be shown on the Utility Plan. 6. A written agreement from the property owners to the north will be required for the off -site grading. 7. Confirm that the house set - backs and side yard easements meet City Code for the existing house on Lot 4 Block 1. The size of this lot was reduced from previous submittals. 8. The existing street right -of -way will need to be formally vacated. This requires a petition and public hearing. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM To: Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Reference: Grandview 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -440D (651) 292 -0063 Fax www.tkda.com Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Drainage Review Proj. No..: From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Routing: Date: May 23, 2007 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 13810.004 The following drainage review is based on these submittals: 1. Grandview Preliminary Grading, Utility, and SWPPP Plans submitted by Plowe Engineering, dated May 14, 2007. 2. Grandview Drainage Calculations submitted by Plowe Engineering, dated May 14, 2007. 3. Geotechnical Report submitted by Braun Intertec Corporation, dated August 27, 2004. The following are significant issues that must be addressed prior to Preliminary Plat approval: 1. Submit a Geotechnical Report for review. The lowest floor elevation is required to be 4 feet above the seasonal high ground water elevation. 05/23/07 The Geotechnical Report does not indicate the seasonal high ground water elevations for the site, which is identified as the mottled soils or highest anticipated groundwater table. Provide documentation indicating the seasonally high groundwater. 2. Provide detailed watershed maps at a legible scale. Include existing contours on the existing conditions watershed map. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 3. Clarify why the watershed boundaries for subcatchments 1 and 2 differ between existing and proposed conditions. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 4. Provide justification for the time of concentration values in the HydroCAD model under existing and proposed conditions. 5. Since disturbed pervious areas are typically compacted during grading operations and will be restored with topsoil, a curve number that corresponds to Type B soils should be used for all disturbed pervious areas in the proposed conditions model. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. • 6. Existing and proposed rates may change due to modifications of the model based on comments 4 and 5 above. Rate control requirements will be reviewed when the updated models are re- submitted. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Grandview Page 2 May 23, 2007 Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 7. The water quality volume in the proposed pond may change based on comments 4 and 5 above. The water quality volumes will be reviewed when the updated calculations are re- submitted. Additional Comments 05/23/07 8. The 100 -year elevation of the pretreatment basin/biofiltration basin is required to be 2 feet below the low floor elevation of the existing parsonage. The following are minor plan, calculations, and drafting corrections that must be addressed prior to final approval: 1. Minimize the grading necessary to accommodate the outlet pipe for the proposed stormwater pond. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 2. The dashed line which runs northwest to southeast through Lots 1 -4, Block 2, is labeled as a survey line and also a Drainage and Utility Easement. Please clarify. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 3. Please clarify the location of the rear yard Drainage and Utility Easements for Lots 1-4, Block 2. •05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 4. The Drainage and Utility Easements for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, should include the 100 -year elevation, plus an additional 10 foot easement beyond the 100 -year elevation of the proposed stormwater pond. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 5. Show the location of the 10 foot wetland buffer on the Plan. 6. The Grading Plan currently shows silt fence where there appears to be no grading. To minimize disturbance near the lake, relocate the silt fence to the grading limits of the site. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 7. Show a defined swale along the north property line of Lot 1, Block 2, to ensure that runoff remains on -site. 05/23/07 Permission must be obtained to perform necessary grading outside of the project limits. 8. Show and label the 150 foot setback from the Ordinary High Water Level of Marshan Lake on the Grading Plan. 05/23 /07 This item has been addressed. 9. It is highly recommended that disturbed areas within 200 feet of Marshan Lake be stabilized with erosion control blanket within 7 days of not being actively worked. 10. Show the location of the rock construction entrance and inlet protection on the Plan. 11. Label the overflow elevation (to the stormwater pond) of the Infiltration Basin on the Grading Plan. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 12. Label the orifice diameter on the Pond Outlet Skimmer detail. • • Grandview Page 3 May 23, 2007 Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 13. Update the high water level labeled on the Utility Plan for the proposed pond. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 14. Include a curve number of 100 in the HydroCAD model for areas with open water. 15. All City maintained storm sewers, including pond outlet structure pipes, are required to be a minimum of 15 inches in diameter. 05/23/07 The pond outlet pipes are required to be a minimum of 15 inches in diameter. All city maintained storm sewer is required to be RCP. 16. Include notes on the Plan incorporating the following: 1) the infiltration area should not be excavated to final grade until the contributing drainage areas have been constructed and fully stabilized, and 2) final excavation of the infiltration areas should be completed using light tracked equipment to avoid compacting the basin floor. 17. To provide a well aerated, highly porous surface, it is recommended that the soils of the Infiltration Basin floor be loosened to a depth of at least 12 inches prior to planting. 18. It is highly recommended that plants be used over seed in the infiltration Basin. Fluctuating water levels following seeding can cause seed to float and be transported downstream of the Tnfiltration Basin. In addition, it may take up to two growing seasons to establish the function and aesthetic value of mature vegetation using seeds. 05/23/07 This item has been addressed. 19. Submit a copy of the NPDES permit for the City's records when available. 20. Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is required. Submit a copy of the RCWD approved permit when available. Additional Comments 05/23/07 21. Provide a 6 inch minimum clearance between the top of orifice and top of weir wall in the pond outlet structure. 22. A skimmer structure is required at the outlet of the biofiltration basin. 23. Label the storm sewer sizes, inverts, and slopes on the Plan. 24. Capture and route runoff from the south end of Stagecoach Trail to the proposed biofiltration basin. 25. It appears from the Grading Plan that runoff from the proposed Stagecoach Trail may flow off -site to the north; however, the proposed drainage area map (subcatchment 4) shows the northern area flowing south and ultimately to the pre - treatment basin. Please clarify. • Memorandum ENVIRONMENTAL To: Paul Bengtson From: Marty Asleson Date: May 31, 2007 Re: May 30, 2007 Environmental Board Recommendations The following recommendations were made concerning Grandview. 1. Sizing must be verified for volume storage, runoff rate and infiltration requirements on proposed infiltration and storage ponds. 2. All infiltration areas must be protected from construction as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 3. All infiltration, pond, and disturbed wetland areas must be planted with the City native seed mix and managed by a company listed with the Minnesota DNR as recommended for such work for a period of at least 3 years. 4. Plan should show access for pond and infiltration area maintenance. 5. Suggest that all houses direct runoff from impervious to pervious grass areas through the use of downspouts. 6. A temporary sediment pond should be installed somewhere on the site that will accept construction water from storm events. 7. Developer shall prepare brochure for new home owners. The brochure should discuss the importance of water treatment and that some areas may be a bit wet after a storm. Other information should include Shoreland Overlay district restrictions on vegetation removal. City will review and approve document before being given to homeowner. 8. The developer has submitted a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP must be approved and implemented prior to the commencement of a grading permit. A number of modifications to the SWPPP have been identified and will need to be incorporated into the final plan as identified in the attached SWPPP memo. 9. Developer should check with the Minnesota DNR on how to develop with National Heritage concerns in the area. • • ENVIRONMENTAL 10. Because of the rare features concerns and the shoreland overlay district, a conservation easement should be drafted that is contiguous with that of Marshan Meadows. Literature shall be given to new residents notifying them of the easement and the reasons for it. Literature will be reviewed and approved by the City. Conservation easement signs should be placed along the easement line with at least one sign per frontage of easement. The sign should state that "no cutting, planting, filling or excavating should occur within the easement." 11. No soils should be imported or exported without city approval. 12. Verify delineation. Motion to forward recommendations by Ms. Bor, 2" d by Ms. Brouillet. All were in favor AERIAL LAYOUT GRANDVIEW OR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (DEVELOPER) OWNER: GETHSEMANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 1000 COUNTY ROAD E. WEST, SUITE 150 7.330 LAKE DRIVE SHOREVIEW MN 55126 LINO LAKES MN 55014 PHONE (651) -483 -5518 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Tracts 8 and C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 182, Anoko County, Minnesota www.egtud.com E. G. Rio a SONS, INC. Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 -8200 Fax (651) 361 -8701 NOTES. - Feld survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 02 -05-07 to include the location of the 01-IWL - Wetland located by EG. Rud & Sons on 2 -05 -07 Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. (651)- 674 -6210 Jan 07. Field verified and approved by Watershed on 1 May 07. - Bearings shown are on Anoko County datum. - Curb shots are taken of the top and back of curb. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and /or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorneys "title opinion. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE WD sm ( IN 7EEt ) 1 inch - 80 ft. BENCHMARK At gage site, 0 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree of the intersection of wooden ramp for dock. Elevation = 886.37 (N.G.V.D. 1929) DEVELOPMENT DATA - Total Plot area = 3.76 Acres - Upland within plat = 3.67 Acres (98X) 0 LEGS DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25347 © DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 7,6 DENOTES HYDRANT pQ DENOTES GATE VALVE DENOTES 12" CMP DENOTES WELL m DENOTES SANITARY STUB ® DENOTES WATER STUB m DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX k DENOTES WETLAND AREA DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS x es,..38 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES FLOOD ZONE LINE 1 ORA811 B7.'NAA JOB Na 06543PP I DATE: 05-14 -07 CHECK Br DWD DWG HD: PRE - PUT -3I SCANNED El 2 3 N0. DALE DESCRIPTION BY DENOTES SOIL LINE DENOTES WETLAND LINE DENOTES OHW LINE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE VICINITY MAP seC. n, TWP. 3, Na R 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALD GUIDING - Property guiding Low Density Single Family. MUSA - Property falls within the MUSA. - No MUSA amendment proposed ZONING - Property is Zoned R -1 ZONE RI MINIMUM BUILDING SC i HACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (OHW) = 150.00 feet ZONE R I MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot Area = 10,800 sq. ft. = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shorelond lot Lot Depth = 135.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feet Lot Width = 100.00 feet (corner) CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the II ws of the State of Minnesota. RECEIVED MAY 1 4 2007 �1 CITY OF LINO LAKES DANIEL W. OBERMILLER Dote: .3/4 ii/ 7 License No. 25341 P P RESOURCE INVENTORY/CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY GRAN- 01110 JR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (DEVELOPER). OWNER:`GETHSEMANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 1000 COUNTY ROAD L WEST, SUITE 150 '. 7330 LAKE DRIVE` " SHOREVIEW MN 55126 LINO LAKES MN. 55014 PHONE:.(651)4W-5518 P I I Scow R. h� 1 1 i f •- I` i t- �� low p 9' �I I NOTES - Field survey was 'completed by Ea Rud and Sons. Inc. on 02-05-07 to include the location" of the OHWL - Weiland located by -Ea Rud & Sons on 2-05-07 - Wetlond delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. (651)-674-6210 Jon 07. Field vwified and approved by Watershed on 1 May 07. - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. - - Curb shots are taken ot'the. top and bock of kxnti- t - This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work- Additional Professional Land Surveyors easements, restriction, and/or encumbrances may exist other than those 1Af�W 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 �,m m°� �torneystitleto ropnkri on upon receipt of ° aurent title Lino Lakes, MN 55014 TeL (651) 361-8200 fmc(651) 361-8701 PROPERTY DESCI2PTION Tracts B and -a REGISTERED -LAND SURVEY N0. 182, Anoka County, Minnesota S� V�rf'eE lR' 0 Ana+ aS N IMJA O WG7. nqN EARIN Sk7ENrF .w1 2ap7. . -LOC MM OF a&7.b OW UK S \�% N YJ. Z iO i's OJr N N.Iyen o ��• I 1 1 I I I I I i ORANN Br MM .K)B Na: 0a54 -WP I DAIS OS -.14-07 OHM Bt` DMD DNC NQ PRE-R.A7=3 _ ",CD I 2 s N0. DAIS DESrlePnON BY GRAPHIC SCALE IN TISa7 ) I moa - 40 a BENCHMARK At gage site, a 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground an Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden romp for dodo Elevation - B86.37 (N.0 V.D. 1929) DEVELOPMSIT DATA - Told Plot area - 3.75 Acres Upland within plat - 367 Aces (98%) 0" DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS/ 25341 m DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Tx DENOTES HYDRANT pd DENOTES GATE VALVE DENOTES 12- CMP ® DENOTES WELL m DENOTES SANITARY STUB ® DENOTES WATER STUB . m DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX 1L DENOTES WETLAND AREA DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS ■.vs DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE t1 DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES FLOOD ZONE LINE DENOTES SOL LINE ------- DENOTES WETLAND UNE VICINITY MAP SEG 17. TWP. 3L RJG. 22 ANO" (X U4W. MME OTA MT TO SCALD GUIDING - Property guiding taw Density Single Family. MUSA - Property falls within the MUSA. - No MUSA amendment proposed ZONNG - Propertyis Zoned R-1 ZONE R 1 MB•IIMLJM BULDNG SE73ACKS Front - 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side - 10.00 feet (house) Side - 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (OHW) - 150.00 feet ZONE R I ke&A 1M LOT STANDARDS Lot Area - 10,800 sq. fL = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shorelond lot Lot Depth - 135.00 feet Lot Width - 80.00 feet Lot Width - 100.00 feet (corner) DENOTES ONW LINE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE RECEIVED •-�'�'�"��'"-"'' DENOTES BIILWINOUS SURFACE ES ..-'_--'..�.•'_."-©.`".r-�_ DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE MAY CERTFICATION 1 4.2007 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan (r`j7Y Or U�0� or report was prepared by me or and '�+nC•S' my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the la s of the State of Minnesota DAV41EL W. OSERMILLER P P 2 Date:_ License No. 25341 / � I .. I f" • A A r� r� n , Y:gs 1 I I 1 1 .•a!A ' �� o 0 / r EXISTIN � ,%eti%�7r�( rte__ P I I Scow R. h� 1 1 i f •- I` i t- �� low p 9' �I I NOTES - Field survey was 'completed by Ea Rud and Sons. Inc. on 02-05-07 to include the location" of the OHWL - Weiland located by -Ea Rud & Sons on 2-05-07 - Wetlond delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. (651)-674-6210 Jon 07. Field vwified and approved by Watershed on 1 May 07. - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. - - Curb shots are taken ot'the. top and bock of kxnti- t - This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work- Additional Professional Land Surveyors easements, restriction, and/or encumbrances may exist other than those 1Af�W 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 �,m m°� �torneystitleto ropnkri on upon receipt of ° aurent title Lino Lakes, MN 55014 TeL (651) 361-8200 fmc(651) 361-8701 PROPERTY DESCI2PTION Tracts B and -a REGISTERED -LAND SURVEY N0. 182, Anoka County, Minnesota S� V�rf'eE lR' 0 Ana+ aS N IMJA O WG7. nqN EARIN Sk7ENrF .w1 2ap7. . -LOC MM OF a&7.b OW UK S \�% N YJ. Z iO i's OJr N N.Iyen o ��• I 1 1 I I I I I i ORANN Br MM .K)B Na: 0a54 -WP I DAIS OS -.14-07 OHM Bt` DMD DNC NQ PRE-R.A7=3 _ ",CD I 2 s N0. DAIS DESrlePnON BY GRAPHIC SCALE IN TISa7 ) I moa - 40 a BENCHMARK At gage site, a 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground an Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden romp for dodo Elevation - B86.37 (N.0 V.D. 1929) DEVELOPMSIT DATA - Told Plot area - 3.75 Acres Upland within plat - 367 Aces (98%) 0" DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS/ 25341 m DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Tx DENOTES HYDRANT pd DENOTES GATE VALVE DENOTES 12- CMP ® DENOTES WELL m DENOTES SANITARY STUB ® DENOTES WATER STUB . m DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX 1L DENOTES WETLAND AREA DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS ■.vs DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE t1 DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES FLOOD ZONE LINE DENOTES SOL LINE ------- DENOTES WETLAND UNE VICINITY MAP SEG 17. TWP. 3L RJG. 22 ANO" (X U4W. MME OTA MT TO SCALD GUIDING - Property guiding taw Density Single Family. MUSA - Property falls within the MUSA. - No MUSA amendment proposed ZONNG - Propertyis Zoned R-1 ZONE R 1 MB•IIMLJM BULDNG SE73ACKS Front - 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side - 10.00 feet (house) Side - 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (OHW) - 150.00 feet ZONE R I ke&A 1M LOT STANDARDS Lot Area - 10,800 sq. fL = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shorelond lot Lot Depth - 135.00 feet Lot Width - 80.00 feet Lot Width - 100.00 feet (corner) DENOTES ONW LINE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE RECEIVED •-�'�'�"��'"-"'' DENOTES BIILWINOUS SURFACE ES ..-'_--'..�.•'_."-©.`".r-�_ DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE MAY CERTFICATION 1 4.2007 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan (r`j7Y Or U�0� or report was prepared by me or and '�+nC•S' my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the la s of the State of Minnesota DAV41EL W. OSERMILLER P P 2 Date:_ License No. 25341 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRANDVIEW iikt: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (DEVELOPER) 1000 COUNTY ROAD E. WEST, SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 PHONE: (651) -483 -5518 F -1,1 �1 / \ t — - -- x-41 -- 1 1 1 m EX5TIN CHURCH BUILDIN OWNER: GETHSEMANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 7330 LAKE DRIVE UNO LAKES MN 55014 NORTH UNEIOF GOVERNMENT LOT 4, SOUTH �_ -UNE OF GOVVEERtNIO.71T LOT 3, & SOUTH 1.114E..--' OF THE PLAT OF MARSHAN MEA00MS ..:-.. E. c.'"' / I m • l l, rot 1 I ,rlr: Lis 1186'66'04 -1I I 417.4± stb 137.7 - -- r, l 1-r. i_.. fe i. e i. • i1 1 0 I /14,460 sf. UTAL fi c l; --t10,1320 st, [t z UTIL' EASD 134275 sf. TOTAL 10,896 sCf. ' ,�EX. POND EAISD 2 offr G1, __ \r \ - `5C'Pc 237.51 • \sOD 20,009 sf, Cto wetlan j. I! St0 -'6tnf Une> 11 r \1: PROPERTY DESORPTION. Tracts B and C, REGISTERED. LAND - SURVEY NO. 182, Anoka County, Minnesota. • LOCATION OF 801L N0 DELREATION ' /.. \ ` . - -BY EPRTN SCIENCE JAM. 2007. ` - -LOCATION OF 8633 OHW LO1E �- t• N8833'O4 W 260.77 • 0 Tes 2 20,017.sf, Cto. wetland Une) \ < \ ,OFIW sf. ine) <"Ml x'04.11' — <� z....e \ b _ \ \� _J 60.0'•'°'. E. G. RUD a SONS, INC. 'am Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 -8200 Fax (651) 361 -8701 svvrx.egnsd.cons 3 15 \400 sf. TOTAL. -. POND EASE_ r i 1u sf. T T L, 12330 sf / i4/ — 60.0' __ r. $)] , T >J In o r 1- 209.77 id !'1 il to wetland Une> 20,460 sf. Cto 131-1W Une> I 1 L_ . r- 1 1I-- .. I NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 02 -05-07 to include the location of the OHl4L Wetland located by E.G. Rud & Sons on 2 -05-07 - Wetland - delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. '651) -674 -6210 Jan 07. Field verified and approved by Watershed on 1 May 07. - Bearings shown ore on Anoka County datum. - Curb shots are taken at the top and bock of curb. - This .survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and /or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorneys title opinion. 4 4 20.151 sf. 7oi -_ 'Cto wetland Une> 20,725 sf. Cto OHV -llne> :0 N139'56'04'w 9'54'26"E A •/ A r1 i I I A -L 1 \/ I r l F r !- -'i 1-7 I\ I Il / -1 I \ ♦/ I I / -\ I es-35 I / r Li DRAWN BY: NAA .108 140, 06543PP I DATE: 05 -74-07 CHEMS 82 1W0 DWG NCO PRE- PLAT -31 SCANNED ❑ 3 NO. DATE DESCRIPDON BY so NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE a ( 2 2r ) 1 inch - 40 ft TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTUTY EASEMENTS I I II II J L Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated and adjoining side lot fines, and rear lot tines and 10 feet in width and adjoining street lines, DEVELOPMENT DATA - Total Plat area = 3.76 Acres - Upland within plat = 3.67 Acres (98Z) - 8 Proposed Single Family Lots - Single Family Lots = 3.26 Acres - Streets = 0.49 Acres - Average Lot Size - 17,788± sf - Density = - 2.12 Lots / Acre • . DENOTES GRODMONUMENT FOUND -A5 LABELED o - DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25341 ® DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 1;C DENOTES HYDRANT 04 DENOTES GATE VALVE ( DENOTES 12' CMP ® DENOTES WELL o DENOTES SANITARY STUB f DENOTES WATER STUB 1D DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX AL DENOTES WETLAND AREA -:_ DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS r T T \ DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH UNE - • - DENOTES SETBACK UNE - - - - - -- .DENOTES WETLAND UNE -- •�••••■»� DENOTES OHW LINE I.;_?:. :•.,.3 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE VICINITY MAP SEC, 17. TWP. 31. RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MM.ESOTA (NOT TO SCALD GUIDING - Property guiding Low Density Single Family. MUSA - Property falls within the MUSA - No MUSA amendment proposed ZONING - Property is Zoned R -1 ZONE R I MINIMUM BULDNG SCI BACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (OHW) = 150.00 feet ZONE R I MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot Area = 70,800 sq. ft. = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shoreland lot Lot Depth = 135.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feet Lot Width = 100.00 feet (comer) BENCHMARK At gage site, a 60d spice, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot osh tree at the in -. .. of wooden romp for dock. Elevation CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or unde my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the I of the State of Minnesota. DA IEL W. OBERMILLER Date: S1/41l1,- License No. 25341 PP- 3:\rud \CAD \06proJ \06543PP\PRE= PLAT -3.dwg 5/14/2007 -. 12:18:51 PM CDT ENCIPIEDINO PLUME Erwiromenitrea Lai DEW PM SU= ID 1.1110 IAIatL ee 891 ria0 On91 hereby certify that this john woe prepared, by me or undo my serest supervision and that '1 om o.duly Licensed Professions Engineer ypdpr the laws SIP y otate of Minnesota DATE ADAM. 5/14/07 141553 LICENSE e 43963 - PRELIMINARY GRADING GRANDVIEW et: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (DEVELOPER) OWNER: GETHSEMANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 1000 COUNTY ROAD E. WEST, SUITE 150 7330 LAKE DRIVE SHOREVIEW MN 55126 LINO LAKES MN 55014 PHONE: (651)- 483 -5518 EXtSTIN CHURCH BUILDIN I / % ,I e0* oibp. / -, %can 1 t- ' 1;1 r t/( /1 F r . r 41 / %I \. '�I�. . -T 1 1 ..CIS .(. 1 I • So < % >- -xs^4.e — — NORTH LINE O COVFRr1UEN1 1.07 4. SOUTH _Leff OF F LOT 3, & SOUTH L8l1: -- / OF THE PLAT OF MARS1AN MEADOWS 1 I %ea�ee I 1 1 000'M'ep0, %eel x901�get PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Tracts C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 182, Anoka- - County, Minnesota BENCHMARK At goge site, a 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden ramp for dock. Devotion = 886.37 (N.G.V.D. 1929) %e81.t1' A 00' Awp.5 g 0 to 1. 4 ` Jt" p a LOCATION OF WETLAND DELINEATION EARTH SPENCE JAN. 2007. •` — LOCATION OF 883.3 OHW LINE 1itf.C`. y1 m r- f, m vr`c `1W. A io , 5.0 • . rC48:1; z' m pm m c1 T G % �1 � •e1 ess.76c8 O Io Y c . . ao zth yt m .Z � N F o0 G I O a sat sso woo 0 'a; m —t rlat 0001 G. RIM SONS, INC. CrE. Professional Land Surveyors www.egrudcom 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 -8200 Fax (651) 361 -8701 7+e .g I 1 • r• r- i--I 1 l l-; r- / ■ SE 'VI 1A1 fr A 1--i i.t 3%1 -1 / -1 I • NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc on 02 -05-07 to include the location of the OHWL Wetland located by E.G. 'Rud & Sons on 2 -05-07 - - Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science Inc (651)- 674 -6210 Jan 07. Field verified and approved by Watershed on 1 May 07. Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. Curb shots are token at the top and bock of curb. This survey was prepored without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and /or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attomey's title opinion. . . • ZONE 12 I MAVIMUM BULDNG SETBACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet - (garage) Lake (OHW) = 150.00 feet ZONE 'R I MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot Area = 10,800 sq..ft = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shoreland lot Lot Depth = 135.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feet Lot Width = 100.00 feet (comer) NORTH rFl GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 140 (IN FELT) 1 inch - 40 ft PROPOSED HOUSE PAD INFORMATION ��,Danotes pproposed finish grade O front of gorge. Gocge ilea, h O3' above 01Is elev. �-- Denotes house style. (WO-wdkait)(FLATj(LD•lookoat) (Assumed 12 m bsmt depth proposed) Denotes suggested amount to drop garage Denotes finish grade 0 rear of home. Finished bsmt floor is 03 above this elev. on walkout hones and 2.5 below this elevation on lookout lots NOTE: Minimum - Lowest Floor to be 2 feet above HMI_ or 4' feet above NM. of adjacent ponds, and lowest opening to be 1' foot above o controlling EOF. TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTILITY EASEMENTS II II 1 I J L Being 5 feet in width, - unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining side lot lines, and rear lot lines and 10 feet In width and adjoining street fines, DRAM BI" NM .08 Na 0654372P 1047E 5 -14-07 CHECK 85 000 OAO Na PRE-PLAT-3150M&) 0 3 N0 DESCRPSSON ev VICINITY MAP SEC. 17, TWP. 3L RNG. 22 ANOKA COLNTY, AMSOTA NOT TO SCALD • DENOTESI E IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25341 ® DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EX DENOTES HYDRANT pd DENOTES GATE VALVE -4 DENOTES 12- MAP 0 DENOTES SANITARY STUB DENOTES WATER STUB DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX DENOTES WETLAND AREA �"_• -:=' DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS 0 sssss DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES WELL DENOTES SILT FENCE r Ym 0 WrAiti DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (EOF) DENOTES PROPOSED STORM LINE DENOTES WETLAND LINE DENOTES OHW LINE DENOTES STORM STRUCTURE/WRAP DENOTES PROPOSED CATCH BASIN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DENOTES POND LINER UP TO 890 CONTOUR CERTIFICATION 1 .hereby certify that this surve or report was prepared by me my direct supervision and that a duly Registered Land Surveyor the {rows of the S ate of Minnesota. . RECEIVED MAY 1 4 2007 Pion r -r OFUNOLAKES under L/ti DANIEL W. DBERMILLER Dote: s / /'f I177- License No. 25341 C S+ \rud\ CAD \ 06proJ\06543PP\PRE=PLAT -3.dwg 5/14/2007 12:24121 PM CDT 60 few w�NL -is v !r'Z�- IL �ii Y ,�frd • '' x Zr eh GGG777777 ttj - - R,L ANOKA COLNTY, AMSOTA NOT TO SCALD • DENOTESI E IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25341 ® DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EX DENOTES HYDRANT pd DENOTES GATE VALVE -4 DENOTES 12- MAP 0 DENOTES SANITARY STUB DENOTES WATER STUB DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX DENOTES WETLAND AREA �"_• -:=' DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS 0 sssss DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES WELL DENOTES SILT FENCE r Ym 0 WrAiti DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (EOF) DENOTES PROPOSED STORM LINE DENOTES WETLAND LINE DENOTES OHW LINE DENOTES STORM STRUCTURE/WRAP DENOTES PROPOSED CATCH BASIN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DENOTES POND LINER UP TO 890 CONTOUR CERTIFICATION 1 .hereby certify that this surve or report was prepared by me my direct supervision and that a duly Registered Land Surveyor the {rows of the S ate of Minnesota. . RECEIVED MAY 1 4 2007 Pion r -r OFUNOLAKES under L/ti DANIEL W. DBERMILLER Dote: s / /'f I177- License No. 25341 C S+ \rud\ CAD \ 06proJ\06543PP\PRE=PLAT -3.dwg 5/14/2007 12:24121 PM CDT DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: 84.8.. CGS. CHCIOD BY: PRO.I. N0. GCS 07 -1131 ORIGINAL 06.1E: FEBRUARY 9, 2007 k m N cT c z 0 0 z a a 1 NC ROYAL OARS REALTY 1000 COUNT? RD E,1051 SB0REV166. MN 55126 PRONE (651) 485 -5519 51TE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWE GIIANDVIEW PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota GENERAL NOTES • The Information shun on these drawings conceming type and location of exlstlng u tlith.s is not guaranteed to be aeorots or ail ndueiw. Tits contractor is responsible for making his own determination m to type and location of utilities m n ecessary to ovoid damage to these 0(916es. • Contact Gopher State One —Cal at (650 454 -0002 for editing utility locations. • The contractor shag field verify sire, elevation, and location of misting sanilory sewer, storm sewer, and wotsrman and notify Engineer of my discrepancies prior to the start of nstalotbns • Instagotlons shy conform to the City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Standard Utility Specifications (1999 Edition) and the Cltys Standard Specifications • Controotor shag nobly City of fie Tales Engineering Deportment at (651) 962 -2400 a minimum of 24 hours prior to the interruption of my sewer c water services to existing homes or businesses WATENMAIN NOTES • Maintain o minimum of 7.5 feet over all wotermo1 pips • Waterman, shall be r DP CI®s 52 (minimum). • Combined water servee to church lot shall be 6" DIP Class 52 (minimum). • Hydrant leads shall be r DIP Class 52 ( minimum). • Domestic Service Lines shag be 1' copper (type K). • Feld verify arcs and location of existing wotermoin and notify engineer of any discrepancies prior to any installations • Provide preformed insulation, PPG Foangias., or approved equal where sanitary isms or Mann items mosses within 18" of watermain. • Watemrok, bends, tees fittings and hydrant leads .hag be thrust restrained with "Mego—Lug. or approved equal SANITARY SEWER NOTES • Sanitary sneer pipe Mail be PVC SDR 35, .Nees otherwise noted. • Field verify size, elevation. and bastion of existing sanitary samer and notify engineer of any discrepancies prior to any Installations • Sever Service to Church lot to be r PVC Schedule 4s, and on other sanitary sees illservices shag be 4' PVC Schedule 40 (to be stationed from the downstream MH). STORM SEWER NOTES • storm saws shag be RCP (dam M minimum) or HOPE m Moan. • Field verify size, elevation, and location of existing storm suer and notify engineer of any discrepancies prior to any Installations • Stem sews lengths include the loyng length of the apron • Use sand /granular material for bor3R6ing and compaction of HOPE pipe in aeeordo nce with the requirements of ASIA 2321. CURB NOTES • Back—filling of curbs with on —site materials is ndd•ntal to the sub construction. • Curb and gutter Man Mall be D412 unless otherwise noted on plans STREET AND BITUMINOUS NOTES • Sow —out existing Manna. and concrete curb to prmdde butt —)oat. • Removal and disposal of misting street materials m required for construction purposes in incidental • Restore disturbed street to existing or better section as approved by engineer. • Contractor shag ues traffic control measures (n accordance with the "Mi nesoto Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices") as necessary whenever grodng. utility. or paving operations encroach onto odjocent streets LEGEND Existing Wotmnain Proposed Waterman Existing Sanitary sewer Proposed Smfory Sews Existing Store Sewer Proposed Storm Sews Existing Sanitary Manhole Proposed Sanitary Sees Manhole Dieting Hydrant Proposed Hydrant Existing Storm Sewer MoNele /Apron Proposed Catch Basin/Storm Sewer Manhole Existing Flared —End Section Proposed Flared—End Section Existing Gate Valve Proposed Gate Valve Existing Overhead Wire Existing Telephone Line Existing Utility Pole NORTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4, SOUTH ___LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3, & SOUTH LINE ; OF THE PLAT OF MARSHAN MEADOWS i• • 1 1 A A /1 1- -I /1 I yl l •f • r \ 1 F ( I / 1 . L _ ___� 1 1 I- --1 4' �� w r 1r N CLEAN—OUT RN 899.50 INV891.01- 6' PVC CAP ?t71%1•5 INV BBI.S2t 6' DI PLUG 1 1 \ ,\ • • `• • • L' T r DIP %%FERMAN • • • • °6'190 • On ‘°C. P�Q(0 -1. ep0� � N94,1" let 1� 001 • ...•',0,c0 V5%0' 311L LOCATION OF WETLAND DELINEATION 46.\ --BY EARTH SCIENCE JAN. 2007. • • • • • • • X 6' GATE SIDETNALK 510E 11F .EES. PLACE NC SERFS. ,s 1 PASO SICOVALK cm) \\ .— LOCATION OF 883.3 OHW LINE $Ili frt Q 0 • • • • \ \\ 55 • • \ \\ . 1 \ \\ •\ \� • • • \ ,/ • • • ' \ \. \\ • \-__� \. \ • • • • \\ • • \ • • POSSBIE PRIV TRAIL cam • • I1 • 11- 1 I1 I1 11 I1 I \ _ 11 • r 40 I 1 1\ i / / • �_- 8• x6',x %SAL ID VAG HYDRANT (µp VAL r s r he /4 I 1 11 11 //- / / I t: T 2I r r - 1 ( 1-- 1 1 L - ,. /\ /♦ I rs / 1 \/ G- 3 \ 1 REMOVE G SALVAGE gOSTIN s,1{ CID >,.. WYµA,1ERMM( r -it 1/4" 88lD AND GATE VALVE EASING SEDER MTh -POOR-SAN JM4 1 R91 891185 ID RN N 861.40 "91v WT e8t. r - . 1 r - / j 4 L O f0 Q n -0 erg 1 150. •rte i) DOMING HYDRANT AND VALVE EXIST. HSE A A A IV! /I 1 1 / t r\ • 1 1- F( I--(. /_I I 9 • 1 f/ 1 ECEivED (AY I 4 2007 C ' OI- L NO LAKE ENGINEERING, INC 6776 LAKE DROVE IMO LAKES. MR 5501• PROM (651) 561 -821 FAX, (651) 981 -6791 NORTH 0� 15 3D 1 W0H • 30 FEET C2 GRANDVIEW TORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN [SWPPP) City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE 1. The Permittee(s) (either the owner or operator) must routinely inspect the construction site once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours 2 AB nspeotlons and mantenana conducted dying conelroction must be recorded in writing and these records must be retained with the SWPPP in accordance with RECORD DETENTION. Records of each Inspection and maintenance activity shag Inducts shag include o. Dote and time inspections; b. Nara of perscn(e) conducting ins ection8 e Findings of inspections, including recommendations for corrective aetbno d Corrective actions taken (bdudhg dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities); a. Data and amount of rainfall events greater than 1/2 inch (OS inches) h 24 hours, and C Documentation of changes mode to the SWPPP. 3. Where pats of the ronetruetlon site hove undergone find Mobilization, but work remain an other parts of the site, inspections of the stabilized areas may be reduced to once per month. Where work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions. the required Inspections and mohtenanee must take place as soon as runoff occurs at the site or prier to resuming constructwo whichever comas first 4. Al erosion prevention and sediment control BUN must be inspected to ensure Integrity and effectiveness Ad nonfunctional BMPe must be repaired. replaced, or supplemented with functional BAPS The Pernitee(s) must investigate and comply with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: e All silt fences must be repaired. replaced or supplemented when they became nanfanatknd (develop tears, detach from poste, post become dislodged from ground et.) or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. These repairs must be made within 24 hours of discovery, or as soon as the field conditions allow access b. Temporary and permanent sedimentation ponds must be trained and the sedanent removed when the depth of the sediment collected in the bash reoehee 1/2 the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours of discovery ar as soon as field conditions allow access c Surface waters, Including drainage ditches and conveyance systems, must be inspected for evidence of sediment being deposited by erosion. The Pennitee(s) must remove al deltas and sediment deposited h aurfoce waters, Including drainage ways catch basin, and other drainage systems, and restobetre the areas where sediment removal resutb in exposed sol. The removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) days of discovery unless preluded by legal, regulatory, or phydcd occew constraints The Permltee shag use all reasonable efforts to obtain access If preluded removed and stabilization must take plane within seven (7) calendar days of obtaining access The Parader, is responsible for contacting ore local, regional state and federal outhorttiea and receiving any applkubie permits, prior to conducting any work d Construction site vehice exit locations must be Inspected for evidence off-site sediment troddng onto paved surfooes Tracked sediment must be removed from all off -site paved surfaces, within 24 hours of discovery, or H applcoble, within a snorter time. e The Pemdttee(s) are responsible for operation and maintenance of temporary and permanent water crudity management BLIPS, as well as dl crown prevention and sediment control BLIPS, for the duration of the construction work at the site. The Permittee(e) ore responsbe until another Pernitee has assumed control over areas of the site that have not been finally stabilized or the site has undergone find stab9lzatian, and a Notice of Termination hen been submitted to the MPCA (see TERMINATION OF COVERAGE). • If sediment escapes the construction she. off -site occumubtioas must be removed in a manner and at o frequency sufficient to minimize off -she impacts (e.g., fugitive sediment In streets could be washed into storm ers by the next ran and /or pose a safety hazard to users of pundit streets). 5. Ad nfdtratbn areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activities is reaching the bfdtratbn area and these areas are protected from compaction due to construction equipment driving across the infiltration area POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES The Permitee(s) shall implement the following pollution prevention management Measures on the site 1. Solid Waste Collected sediment, asphalt and concrete M9lingc, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and must amply with MPCA disposal requirements. 2 Hazardous Materioe OR, gasoline, point and any hazardous eubetonoes must be properly stored Including secondary cantonment to prevent spill. leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste Must be in coos:ien. with MPCA regulations. 3. External washing of fracas and other construction vehicle must be Invited to 0 defined area of the site. Runoff must be contained and walls properly disposed of. No engine degreasing s allowed on site. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING 1• Dewotering or basin droning (.g.. pumped discharges trench/ditch cuts to drainage) related to the construction activity that may have turbid or sediment laden discharge water must be discharged to a temporary or permanent eedbnentotion born on the project site wherever possible. If the water cannot be discharged too sedimentation basin prior to entering the surface water, It must treated with the appropriate 91P, such that the discharge does not adveroely affect the receiving water or 400natreom landowner. The Permittee(s) must ensure that discharge points ono adequately protected from erosion and scour. The discharge must be dispersed over natural rock rlprrp, sand bogs plastic sheeting or other accepted energy dissipation measure. Adequate odbnental'an control measarrs are required for disaarge water that contains suspended solids. 2 Al water from dewatering or basin draining octfvitiw must be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance condition, erosion in reserving channels or on downsiope properties, a inundation in wetlands causing aignlflcont adverse Impact to the wetland AMENDMENTS 7D SMPPP The Permittee(s) must amend the SWPPP as necessary to include addtiond requirements, such as additional or modified BLIPS. designed to correct problems identified or address situations whenever: L There is a change In design.. construction, operotlon, maintenance, weather or season conditions that has a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or underground waters; 2 Inspection or investigations by site operators, local. state or federal officials nd¢ate the SWPPP is not effective in eliminating or significantly minimizing the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or underground waters or that the discharges are causing water quality standard exceedances, or 3. The SWPPP is not achieving the general objectives of controlling pdWtonts in storm water mscharges associated with construction activity, or the SWPPP is not consistent with the term. and conditions of this permit 4. At ony time after permit coverage a effective, the MPCA may determine that the project's storm water discharges may cause, have reasonable potential to cause, or contribute to non - attainment of any applicable water quality standard. N MPCA makes such a determination, the MPCA will notify the Permittee(s) In writing. In response, the Permittee(s) must develop a supplemented BNP notion plan or appropriate SIAPPP amendments describing SWPPP modifications to address the Identified concerns and submit information requested by the MPC#, which may Malude an Individual permit application. If MPCA's written notification regohoo a response, blurs to respond within the specified tlmefrome constitutes a permit violation FINAL STABILIZATION The Permltee(s) must ensure final stablizotlon of the site. The Permttee(s) must submit a Notice of Termination within 30 days after find stabNzatton is complete, or another owner/operator (Pennittee) has assumed control ova al areas of the site that have not undergone find stabilization. Find stabilization can be achieved in one of the following ways 1. AU sod disturbing at the site have been completed and all soils must be stabgized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent over the entire previous surface area, or other equtvaint means necessary to prevent soil feriae under erosive .eonditidne and; e All dronoge ditches, constructed to drain water from the she after construction is complete. must be stabilized to preclude erosion; b. Ail temporary synthetic, and structural erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Plow (such as sat fence) must be removed as part of the site fad Mobilization and - e The Permhee(s) must dean out all sediment from conveyances and from temporary sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality mancgement basins Sediment must be stabilized to prevent R from being worried back into the basin, conveyance and drainage ways discharging off-she or to surface waters The dean out of permanent bastes must be sufficient to return the basin to design capacity. 2 For resident. construction only, fad stabilization has been achieved when temporary erosion protection and duo gradient perimeter control for individual lots has been completed and the residence hen been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally, the Permitee must distribute the APOA 'homeowner fact sheet' to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of foal stabilization. RECORD DETENTION . The SWPPP, al changes to ft, and inspections and mantenonce records must be kept at the site during construction by the Perrnitee who has operational control of that potion of the sit. The SWPPP can be kept In either the field office of in an on-site vehicle. All owners) must keep the SWPPP, along with the following additional records, on Re for three (3) years after submitted of the NOT as outlined in TERMINATION 00 COVERAGE. This does not Include any records after submitted of the NOT. 1. My other permits required for the project 2. Records d ail Inspection end mdntenance conducted during construction 3. AI permanent operation and maintenance agreements that have been implemented, including a1 right of way, contracts, eovenonte, and other binding requirements regarding perpetual maktenenee and 4. AD required cdo,lotlons for design of the temporary and permanent storm water management system. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE 1. Permittee(s) wishing to terminate coverage under this permit must submit o Notice of lamination (NOT) to the 11PCA. Compliance with the permit is required until a NOT is submitted. The Permittee(s) authorization to discharge under this permit terminates of midnight of the day the NOT is signed 2. Al Permittee(s) must eubmlt o NOT within thirty (30) days after one or more of the fo1Owing conditions have been met a. Final Stabilization has been achieved on all portions of the site for which the Permltee is responsible (naludmg the removal of ad temporary erosion control measures such as set fence, end N applicable, returning agricultural land to its pre construction agricultural use): - b. Mother owner/ operator (Pamlico) has assumed control aging to Part IL8.5 of MPCA Permit No. MN R100001 over all areas of the site that haw not been finally stabeaeet or • For residential construction only. temporary erosion protection and down gradient perimeter control for ndmidud lots has been completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally, the PermRw must distribute the MPCA's 'homeowner foctshcet' to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need for, and beraflts of, find stab0aotnn. SiTE SPECIFIC EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 81E 0133CRPRON A) P801007 NAM . GRANDVIEW 6) PROJECT I OCATION: Between the dead ends of Stagecoach Trail behind Gethsenwny Church. C) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project wW consist of the construction of seven single -family homes and a public street Most hard surface nn-off is routed to a pre - treatment basin, which is to be dried to prevent water infiltration. The bass 030 overflow to a bb- titration bosin whidi has an underdran and a controlled outlet Sod disturbing activities cam Include Installation of a rock construction entrance Installation of slit rote where surface nn-off leaven site she graehp, to include the Import of materiel and export of unsuitable sods watermoik sanitary sewer, and storm sewer installation: building construction including foundation eocmatio n; parking lot and roadway construction; and preparation for turf restoration. E) PErrCENTACE HARD SURFACE 23 F) 517E ARFAS 0) TOTAL m_ lR8ED AREA: 4.35 ACRES H) It ' 1 •,10. w . . . _ . . • .P a: . . . .0 0 . 1 ! ! • , . . • Prior to any grodng operations, the contractor shall instal a rock canstruatlon entrance and perimeter silt fence as shown on plan. (Contact City and /or County to inspect erosion control measures prior to groding operation. If nemsoy.) Additional set fence may be necessary N load conditions require. • Provide "kn. (or approved spud) for ad erieting storm sewer Web that w91 receive run-off during site construction. Provide inlet protection fa. on proposed storm 4ewer inlets within 24 hours of structure hstalbtbn. Wet protection to renwln h -pace anbl site hen been etab9aed. • Remove topsoil from site and place in temporary stockpile location (as determined by Owner). Seed stockpile with temporary seed mix and mulch with weed -free straw if stockpile is to remain in place far more than t me (3) doge • Perform site grading on an areo- by-oreo - boss to minimize uncompleted areas As each area is completed, all exposed soils must hove temporary erosion control protection cc permanent cover according to the following time table TYPE OF SLOPE Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (. Madmen time on even can remain open when tin area is not =Wady being worked.) Ad sod seed mulch and fertilizer shed conform with the following MnDOT specifications as modified below. 118E BEFORE CONslROCRON CONS1FRUUCC110N TOTAL ACE AREA 3.29 ACRES TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES 0.89 ACRES TOTAL ESTIMATED PERVIOUS 3.29 ACRES 240 ACRES 0) TOTAL m_ lR8ED AREA: 4.35 ACRES H) It ' 1 •,10. w . . . _ . . • .P a: . . . .0 0 . 1 ! ! • , . . • Prior to any grodng operations, the contractor shall instal a rock canstruatlon entrance and perimeter silt fence as shown on plan. (Contact City and /or County to inspect erosion control measures prior to groding operation. If nemsoy.) Additional set fence may be necessary N load conditions require. • Provide "kn. (or approved spud) for ad erieting storm sewer Web that w91 receive run-off during site construction. Provide inlet protection fa. on proposed storm 4ewer inlets within 24 hours of structure hstalbtbn. Wet protection to renwln h -pace anbl site hen been etab9aed. • Remove topsoil from site and place in temporary stockpile location (as determined by Owner). Seed stockpile with temporary seed mix and mulch with weed -free straw if stockpile is to remain in place far more than t me (3) doge • Perform site grading on an areo- by-oreo - boss to minimize uncompleted areas As each area is completed, all exposed soils must hove temporary erosion control protection cc permanent cover according to the following time table TYPE OF SLOPE Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (. Madmen time on even can remain open when tin area is not =Wady being worked.) Ad sod seed mulch and fertilizer shed conform with the following MnDOT specifications as modified below. 118E MOOT SPECIFICATION/NOTES Sod 3878 Seed 3876 o For pending areas (above NWL) MnDOT Mixture 350 (at 84 Ws /sae) • For turf establishment MOOT Mixture 280 (100 Ibis /sae) MnDOT Ifahae 270 (120 Iles /acre) Temporary Fad cover Strong /summer 1 -2 yeas cover 2 -5 yeas cover MnDOT Mbdure 1008 (100 lbs /sae) MnDOT Mixture 110 (at 100 ibis /Done) MnDOT Mature 150 (at 40 Ibis /ace) . MnDOT Mixture 190 (at 60 Ibis /acre) ° For biro- fltrotian bosh 110007 Mixture 328 (at 88 its/acre) Mulch 3882 (Type 1 - Disc Anchored) Fertilizer - 3881 Wood Fiber Blanket 3885 (Category 2) 00 To reduce weed establishment. mow 2 to 3 tirnes (30 days Wart) during the let year with the mower deck about 6" - r off the ground. Mow one time during the 2nd yea before weeds set thek seeds Bum or mow once every 3-5 years following the initial 2 yeah of maintenance to remove dead plant material and stimulate mw seed • Mow a minimum of once per 2 weeks The oantraatnr shag Pay special attention to al adjacent property lines and make sure the erosion control practices haloes in those areas prevent migration of sediment onto adjacent properties If any slopes appear to be fading. additional sat fence. biorons and erosion control blanket shall be added as needed The contractor shag maintain and rep. as set fence (Inciudn9 the removd of accumulated sediment) until vegetation is established and the site is stabilized (see also INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE). • - Provide 11p -rap at al pops outlets wimp 24 hours of pipe installation. • Maintain edt fence, ncbdng the removal of aonunmOated sediment through completion of building construction. Set fence to be removed only after completion of bulding construction and upon establishment of vegetation. • Final grade swede areas upon stabilization of upstream areas • Sod MI dsturbed drainage areas, nciudng swabs pond overflows around storm sewer flared -end sections, and off - street catch basin. • Install underground utilities (eater, sanitary sewer, storm sewer) in a manner mat minimaes adverse impacts to the ctonowater BkPs.- • Provide temporary mulch over al pervious areas. • Upon grading completion the contractor shall provide native topsoil, seed and mulch anchored with a straight set dos within 48 hours of find grading. • Excess sod should be treated like other reposed sad and stabilized within 72 hours My soil stockpiles td how Mt fence placed around perimeter. • Adjacent streets shad be kept clean of oonetruetion materials, d"rf, and other ends/sable material. When materials or debris have washed /bowed onto adjacent streets. It is the Contractors responsibility to sweep /scrape streets as necessary or as directed by the City. EROGI0N Coma. lefa fie STRUCTURAL PRACTICES 1. Set Fence - eel be Installed mks to any grading activities along the perimeter of those portions of the W wal fd. are downstream of storm water nm -off. 2. Storm- Water Management - Strom eater drainage Mil be provided by sub and gutter. storm sewer and catch basin Run-off Is to be collected and routed to pre-treatment and ble- Atmtton basins. 3, Storrs Serer Outlet Protection - such as rip -rap and geotastee Star fabric Mil be toadied of storm sewer outlets m a permanent erosion control manure 4. Rode Construction Entrance - shed be end at ail locations where combustion middes leave site onto hard ourface roods 5. Storm Sewer Wet Protection - shitl be used at al CBs to prevent cite sadlment from wading Into pending basin. CM-ER CONTROLS 1. Construction Waste Materials - Ail waste materials generated as o result of site construction shag be collected and removed according to ail local and /or state waste management regulations by a licensed solid waste management company. The contractor ova ensure that all site personnel are instructed in these practices. 2. Hazardous Wastes - Ad hozodous waste materials shall be stored properly to prevent spills and wnddiern. When necessory, hazardous wastes will be disposed of in the manner specified by bed and /or slate regulation or by the manufacturer. 3. Sanitary Waste - All sanitary wrote wit be coll.ted from the portable unfts by a local, licensed water management company, as required by local regulation. 4. Waits Vehicle Tracking - A rack construction entrance has been provided to help reduce vehicle tracking of sedbnente The paved street adjacent to the site entrance shall be swept on on as- needed basis. or as determined by the City. Dump trucks hauling loose material. (sand, topsoil. etc.) to and /or from the site shad be covered with a tarpaulin. 5. Vehicle Cleaning - No engine degreasing is allowed on-site. Extend washing of vehicles to be confined to a defined area ('bone yard) on -sRn. The bone yard is to be at least 50 feet from any .$lOrm drain inlet and shall drain to a temporary pit of adequate volume to hold all liquid and wrote concrete materials generated during washout operation. Hardened concrete shall be broken up and disposed of as required by local regulation. If necessary. place set fence around bone yard area to ensure no sediments enter any storm water basin or storm sewer inlet 16PECIIC318 MD MApI9NAN E PROCEDURES (Mho see 4rpecbtr end M ekdatrn0V tinder VENTRAL ErTOS/0N AND 9 10 CONTROL) The following are the inspection and maintenance practices that 091 be used to maintain erosion and sediment controls • Ad control measures will be Inspected at least once each week and folowbg any storm even of 0.5 inches or greater. • Al measures 011 be maintained in good working order, h a repair is necessary. h MR be initiated within 24 hours or report • Built up sediment Mil be removed frarm sit fence when ft has reached one -third (1/3) the height of the fens • Set fence w® be inspected for depth of sediment tears, to see if the fabric is .curdy attached to the fence posts, and to see that the fence posts are firmly in the grand • Temporary seeding and plantkg will be Inspected for bore mots, washouts, and healthy growth. • A maintenance report ell be mode after each Inspection. M SPITES permit is required for construction. Permit is to remote oo -site at of floes. The Owner and Contractor wall Dosses and be respasmle for implementation of SWPPP, and will be norponabe for erosion contrd measures on -site dotal fowl stobehaten has been achieved and a Notice of Termination (NOT) has been filed with the MPCA The Contractor and Owner shall make available to the City and watershed a Fist of contacts to be notified N repair. and /or maintenance to site erosion control measures are required Contractor to provide designated concrete truck washout area with appropriate signag0 at location shown (or location approved by Engineer). Washout area is to be a minimum of 50' from storm trains, ditches pods, or rainwater garden area. Do not allow run-off from this arts by constructing o temporary pit or banned area large enough for liquid and solid west. After waste concrete Is set. break -up and dispose of properly Contractor to provide phased traffic control (In ocoordonce with the 'Minnesota Maraud of Uniform Traffic Control Devices') as neceasoy whenever grading. Litany work, paving operations, and final we restoration encroach wlthb right -of -way or onto adjacent street. Ad BMWs must be maintained with proper function untt all site work has been completed and site has undergone final strain otian. - - Contractor to provide topsoil stockpile at location designated by owner. Stockpile location(s) to be surrounded by sin fence, If stockpile is to be Inploae longer than 72 hours. provide seed and mulch. DRAWN BY: CHCICD BY: C.O.S. DESIGN BY: C.C.S. PROJ. N0. 07 -1131 ORIGINAL DATE FEBRUARY 9. 2007 F 99 z a z a 0 0 a 0 es Z O. cc R g ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 COUNTY RD E,TIES 8HOHE91Elf MN 55126 PHONE (651) 483 -5518 A <J 818E PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING PLOW! ENGINEERING, INC 6776 TARE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 5501, PHONE: (651) 361 -821 PAZ (651) 361 -8701 C3 ECRANDVIEW 1'ORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota ESWPPPI WIMCO INLET PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE 5' NOTE THE CONTRACTOR. AT HIS OPTION. MAY SUBSTITUTE A GEOTEXTBE FABRIC, SPEC. 3801 FOR THE GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET UNLESS 0114ERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS. THE FABRIC SHOULD COVER THE AREA OF THE RIPRAP. RIP -RAP OVERFLOW NOT TO SCALE 6' MINIMUM WASHED ROCK BOCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE LW- 2.W SEE SEC. A-A Nag B-9 5 X MA. NOTE: 114E CONTRACTOR, AT 155 OP110L NAY SUBSTITUTE A GDIEYIAE FABRIC, SPEC. 3601 FOR DE GRANULAR FUER 01311RT 18414 001SRMS£ SPEWED N OE PLANS. THE FAB= 9HCOD CONDI 11E AREA Ir THE WRAP AM EXTEND UNDER THE CULVERT APRON 3 FEET. RIP -RAP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOTES: - ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SOLVENT MELD EXCEPT AS NOTED. - ALL PIPE TO BE SCHEDULE 40 SERVICE CLEAN OUT Y X Y WOOU OR STEEL. POST 7 -Y 0.0 MME MESH REINFORCEMENT, STD. FIELD FENCE MK 30' HIGH, MAX- MESH SPACING OF 6' AND MIN. 14-1/2 GAUGE WIRE I5 OPTIONAL GEDTEXTI.5 FILTER FABRIC - OVERLAP 6' AND FASTEN AT 2' INTERVALS LAY FABRIC IN TRENCH. FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. BACKFILL TRENCH WRN TAMPED NATURAL S02 DIRECTIO8 OU RUNOFF EXTEND WIRE MESH ono TRENCH AIPPORT•POST ANCNORAOE EN -SITU S. NOTES. 1) WIRE MESH 15 NOT REWIRED. 2) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE -FOR REMOVAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS FOLLOWING TURF ESTABLISHMENT. EROSION CONTROL FENCE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE HINGED GRATE ELEV= 890.10 TOP WALL= 889.75 10' DIAN, ORIFICE INV 888.75 WEIR WALL PLANT MATERIAL TOLERANT OF INUNDATION AND DROUGHT (NATIVE PLANTS RECOMMENDED) OR USE MnDOT 5® MIXTURE 328 (RA1E =88 IBS /ACRE) ELEV■867.75 ELEV- 867.26 ELEV- 886.24 2' MW. 5/8' B RO WELD ALL TYPI I— ll' =1��`.ii =-1 =11 mil= NEIL- GRADED PLANTING MEDIUM (SEE NOTE 11) AGGREGATE (SEE NOTE #2) NON -WOVEN GEOTEXILLE (MnDOT TYPE 1) OVER AGGREGATE C PERFORATED DRAIN W/ SOCK INV 886.25 (EXTEND. TO MANHOLE) 1/4' STEEL BAND l/4 STEEL PLATE EL.EV= 890.60 /2" :AMMER, ANCHOR BOLT. MINIMUM 4' EMBEBMENT ELEV =886.25 ELEV= 886.25 6' °RAINDLE INV 886.25 (ENTERS THIS SIDE OF WEIR WALL) STABILIZATION BLANKET (SEE NOTE 83) 18' WELL- GRADID PLANTING MEDIUM (SEE NOTE $1) IN-SITU SOILS AGGREGATE BED W/ 6' PERFORATED DRAWEE W/ SOCK (SEE DETAIL AT LEFT) BASIN NOTE5 1. WELL- GRADED PLANTING MEDIUM TO BE COMPRISED OF (BY VOWME 400 SEMI- COURSE WASHED OR NATIVE SAND 300 MnDOT GRADE - 2 COMPOST 300 NATIVE TOPSOIL 2. AGGREGATE SHALL BE THE FOLLOWING: 1' -t.5 DOUBLE WASHED STONE 1/4•-1/2 WASHED RIVER RUN PEA GRAVEL 3. STABILPATION BLANKET 10 BE SUITABLE FOR SEEDING (E.G STRAW - COCONUT BLANKET). 4. NO MINING OF SANDY SOILS ALLOWED IN BASIN. 5. FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABIUZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS 6. RIO- FILTRATION BASIN TO REMAIN UNLINED. 7: PROTECT BASIN FROM RUN -OFF DURING LOT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. CONSTRUCT BASIN ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS 8. USE NON - PERFORATED DRNNTILE OUTSIDE OF BASH. RIO- FILTRATION BASIN NOT TO SCALE 1/2' TIP. GRATE GALVANIZED 1 1/4' THICK BY 1 I/2' NIDE BY 56 5/8' LONG STEEL PLATE B' LONG HINGES MOONY 1/2 PN STEEL BARD 1/4' THICK -BY 1 1/2' WIVE BY 7 -6 5/8' LONG WRAPPED AROUND AND WELDED TO STEEL RCM CONCRETE OUTLET STRUCTURE NO SCALE 51 I/O. DIAMETER. 8' LONG THREADED ANCHOR BOLTS MTH 1 1/4' FLAT WASHER AND NUT N 4 LOCLTIONS STEEL 8005 0.C. EACH WAY WAD AT EACH INTERSECTION STEEL PLATE 1/C TRICK WELDED TO STEEL RODS - TYPICAL, 4 LOCATIONS TOP VIEW EfVED MAY 1 4 2007 CfTY OF LJNO LAKES DRAM BY: B.J$ CHCKO BY C.C.S DESIGN BY. C.C.S PROJ. NO. 07 -1131 ORIGINAL DATE NAY 14, 2007 REVISION DESCRIPTION 5O a us 1 x E. ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 COUNTY RD EWNST SHOREVIEW, MN 55128 PHONE (651) 482 -5518 SITE - PLANHLNG & ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING, IN 6776 LATE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LOS, MN 55014 PHONE (651) 381 -8213 FAX (851) 381 -8701 C4