Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/12/2007 P&Z PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, December 12, 2007 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers (Scheduled to be televised on Ch. 16) Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 10, 2007 and November 14, 2007 IV. OPEN MIKE V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING for a Preliminary Plat for a two lot residential subdivision to be called Marshan Meadows 2nd Addition, located at 7332 Stagecoach Trail, PIN 17- 31 -22 -31 -0011 — Paul Bengtson B. PUBLIC HEARING for a Preliminary Plat for a one lot residential subdivision to be called Vaughan's 1st Addition, located at the north end of Ruffed Grouse Road on Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, PIN 27- 31 -22 -23 -0010 — Paul Bengtson — Item to be tabled at meeting. C. Variance to allow an existing detached accessory structure to encroach into the side setback, 2221 Reiling Road — Paul Bengtson D. PUBLIC HEARING for a Conditional Use Permit for a Commercial Planned Unit Development; a PUD Preliminary Development Plan/Preliminary Plat; a Conditional Use Permits for a motor fuel station; a Conditional Use Permit for a car wash; and two Conditional Use Permits for outdoor dining, for a four lot commercial development to be called Main Street Village located at the SE Corner of I -35E and Main Street, PIN 24- 31 -22 -13 -0005 and 24- 31 -22 -13 -0002 — Jeff Smyser E. PUBLIC HEARING for an amendment to the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 4. related to the completion of permitted exterior work on buildings — Jeff Smyser VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Update on Comp Plan Process — Open House VII. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4- minute limit • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice - Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT October 10, 2007 6:30 P.M. 6.55 P.M. : Michael Hyden, Perry Laden, Robert Nelson, Brian Pogalz (Vice Chair), Paul Tralle (Chair), Rob Rafferty : Michael Root : Paul Bengtson, Jeff Smyser I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on October 10, 2007. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 8, 2007 Mr. Hyden made a MOTION to approve the August 8, 2007 Minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Nelson. Motion carried 4 - 0. (Rafferty abstained.) IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:33 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:34 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 - 0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. Final Plat for an eight lot residential subdivision to be called Grandview, 7330 Lake Drive, Royal Oaks Realty DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 10, 2007 Page 2 Mr. Bengtson presented the staff report. He clarified that limits will not be placed regarding the size of docks. He stated that mowing of areas within the conservation easement will not be allowed, and that the city will be responsible for regulating the conservation easement area. Mr. Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, applicant, thanked city staff for their cooperation with this application. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to recommend approval of the Final Plat for an eight lot residential subdivision to be called Grandview at 7330 Lake Drive. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 5 - 0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Update on Comp Plan Process Mr. Smyser stated that the Advisory Panel meeting for October was cancelled due to the extensive work involved in updating information gathered at the September meeting. Staff is currently working with the Rice Creek Watershed District to analyze storm water management and runoff. Federal and local agencies are working with staff to produce a quality end result. Mr. Smyser concluded that although the process is behind in the original time schedule, the progress made has been worth it. Mr. Smyser stated that staff foresees some changes to city ordinances, but to what extent will be determined as the process continues. B. Update on 49/J Mr. Smyser reminded the board that staff has been working with three other jurisdictions to finalize the signalization at the intersection of County Road J and Hodgson Road. Due to budget issues, the signals are now planned for installation in 2008. Mr. Smyser explained that the jurisdictions decided that the signals should be installed while the money is available. Mr. Smyser added that any necessary improvements to, or relocations of, the signals when development occurs will be paid for the most part by the developer(s). VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Laden made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT EMBERS ABSENT STAII'F PRES • November 14 : 6:31 P.M. 7 :42 P.M. Michael Hyden, Perry Laden, Brian Pogalz (Vice Chair), Michael Paul Tralle (Chair), Rob Rafferty None : Paul Bengtson, Michael Grochala 2007 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. on November 14, 2007. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Tralle requested the addition of a discussion item to update the board on the status of Legacy at Woods Edge. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 10, 2007 The approval of the October 10, 2007 minutes was tabled to the December meeting. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:33 p.m. Lloyd Chalupsky and Sally Bachmeier of 2215 Reiling Rd spoke regarding a dispute with a neighboring property owner, Kenneth Muehlstedt of 2221 Reiling Road, that they stated has been ongoing since 2004. Ms. Bachmeier explained that Mr. Muehlstedt applied for a variance, was asked to submit a survey, and has yet to do so. They are wondering how long the city is going to allow Mr. Muehlstedt to submit the necessary documentation. Staff explained a history of the issues between the property owners for the board. Mr. Bengtson clarified that Mr. Muehlstedt's application for a variance to the setback for an existing garage was complete, however staff requested that an updated survey be DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 14, 2007 Page 2 submitted for review. Therefore, staff explained that the variance application will be placed on the December meeting agenda. Staff explained that the applicant's garage was built with a permit and was inspected. However it was since discovered that setback requirements were not properly met. The applicant brought a variance request for the setback before the P &Z Board a few years past, the P &Z recommended denial and the applicant chose to withdraw the application. Staff explained that the applicant then removed what he believed to be the encroachment. Ms. Bachmeier stated that Mr. Muehlstedt's existing garage, driveway and fence do not meet setback requirements. Mr. Grochala explained that there have been a number of issues with this site. He stated that the matters in question recently went before the city council and have been turned over to the City Attorney for review. Mr. Grochala added that both property owners need to be heard by the board. Ms. Bachmeier noted that the structural engineer who gave his opinion to Pete Kluegel (city building official), regarding the addition to the attached garage, did so without visiting the property. She stated this addition does not meet code. Mr. Tralle stated that he understands the property owners' frustration, but the issue will be discussed at next month's meeting. He asked for their patience with this issue. Mr. Tralle requested that staff speak with the city's attorney and move things along. Mr. Pogalz made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:44 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 - 0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING for an Amendment to the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 3.B. related to the subdivision of unsewered lots Michael Grochala, Community Development Director, presented the staff report. He noted that the city council reviewed the language and requested that it be brought to the P &Z Board for a recommendation. Mr. Grochala explained that limiting the lot size is typically an underwriting issue to aid in the sale of property. The reason appears to be that in the case of a foreclosure, the lender would have an easier time selling a smaller property rather than a larger one. He explained that although a property owner would be required to combine the split parcels prior to a sale, a foreclosure would allow the removed parcel to be sold alone. Board Members were concerned that the city's intent is to control growth and not be left with small lots, and this could potentially be a huge exception. They noted that foreclosures are common and it seems that the city would be opening itself up to opportunities for smaller parcels. They were concerned about the number of potential DRAFT MINUTES • • • Planning & Zoning Board November 14, 2007 Page 3 lots this could affect. Mr. Grochala stated that staff began to analyze this number and estimated that 300 to 400 lots or more could potentially be affected. Board members were also concerned about the possible interpretations of a "lending institution." Mr. Tralle stated that he understands that the city council is looking to keep people in their homes. He is note sure there are many property owners that would even do this, but it would provide an opportunity for those who need it. The majority of board members agreed that they do not think this should be a city ordinance. They pointed out that the city would be making an exception for a number of individuals and there would be consequences to go with it. They do not think the city is in a position to change a policy based on a financial institution. Board Members pointed out that the city is not the one telling individuals they cannot have a reverse mortgage. Mr. Tralle opened the Public Hearing at 7:07 p.m. Nobody was present to speak. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 7:08 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 -0 Mr. Nelson made a MOTION to recommend denial of the Amendment to the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 3.B. related to the subdivision of unsewered lots. Motion was supported by Mr. Hyden. Motion carried 6 - 0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Comp Plan Process — Update Mr. Grochala stated that there was a positive discussion on a number of issues at the last Advisory Panel meeting. He reminded the board that there will be an open house for the public on December 4. He noted that the open house will include a formal presentation as well as the opportunity to address specific questions. He added that a flyer will be included in the city's newsletter this month to invite citizens to attend. B. Legacy at Woods Edge — Update Mr. Grochala updated the board on the progress of the Legacy at Woods Edge development. He informed board members that Hartford Group attended the last Work Session to discuss the next phase, which is a senior housing facility to span independent living, modified care and assisted care living. There will be 140 -160 potential units on site. Hartford intends to submit plans in January in anticipation of building in spring or summer. Mr. Grochala explained that Hartford is proposing to rotate the site from the original master plan in order to maximize commercial visibility to Lake Drive, which will DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board November 14, 2007 Page 4 require amending the Legacy Land Use Plan. He summarized that the Lakewood Apartments should be leased by the end of year, the townhome project is on hold due to the decreased market, and commercial interest has been slow due to the market as well as the Lake Drive improvements. Hartford approached the council with a potential change to the residential housing agreement. They proposed increasing the amount of rental units and decreasing the owner occupied units, as there is a viable market for rental units. Board Members were concerned about the potential loss of restaurants. Mr. Grochala remarked that the proposed changes include maximizing the opportunity for the proposed restaurant pads and the best potential use of the development. Board members did not want to lose the urban feel of the development. C. Transportation — Update Mr. Grochala updated the board on the status of road construction projects. He stated the east side of the Lake Dr. /35W bridge is open. He added that in preparation of demolition of the old bridge, Lake Drive will be closed from Apollo Dr. to Town Center Pkwy for the weekend. Exit ramps will be used as the mainline for 35W and there will be no access to Lake Drive. Drivers will need to take the Lexington exit. He said overall the project is about one week behind schedule and that signalization is now planned for January. He attended the open house for the 35E/Main St. interchange. A park & ride is being considered for the NW quadrant of the interchange. The city has been working with Metro Transit regarding bus routes and park and ride locations. The city needs to consider what the local bus service will be like in the future as part of the Comprehensive Plan. D. 2008 Meeting Dates Mr. Grochala noted that staff distributed a 2008 Meeting Schedule and there were no changes to the regularaly scheduled P &Z Board Meeting dates. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:42 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Pogalz. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Bugge Community Development Assistant DRAFT MINUTES • • • • AGENDA ITEM 5.A. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P &Z MEETING DATE: December 12, 2007 TOPIC: Public Hearing: Marshan Meadows 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat and Final Plat BACKGROUND Bruggeman Homes has requested approval of a 2 lot residential subdivision to be known as Marshan Meadows 2nd Addition. The subject site includes Lot 1 Block 1 of Marshan Meadows. ANALYSIS The following is a summary of the proposal: Site Area 3.79 acres Total Lots 2 Density 0.52 units per acre Upland Area 1.18 acres Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) North Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) South Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) East Marshan Lake N/A N/A West Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential R -1 (Single Family Residential) Growth Management, MUSA Reserve: The subject site is currently located within the MUSA boundary area. Growth Management, Units/Year: The table attached to this report shows the status of the staging plans for final platting of new residential units. The new unit of Marshan Meadows 2nd Addition will not be platted until 2008 and will fit within that year's allotment. Preliminary Plat Shoreland Ordinance: The subject site is adjacent to Marshan Lake, which is considered a Natural Environment Lake and therefore is subject to the more restrictive Shoreland Ordinance Requirements for Lot Dimensions, Impervious Surface Coverage, and Setbacks. The lots depicted on the submitted plats meet all of these requirements. Setbacks: The submitted plans depict all required setbacks, including the 150 foot setback from the Ordinary High Water Line as required by the Shoreland Ordinance. This setback is measured to any improvement attached to the single family dwelling, including decks and /or patios. This means that the southernmost lot (indicated as Lot 2, Block 1) will be very limited in that regard. Impervious Surface Coverage: The lots will all be required to comply with the 30% Impervious Surface Coverage requirement of the Shoreland Ordinance as they develop. Streets: Stage Coach Trail is already in place for the majority of the site and will be connected fully with the Grandview project to the south. A sidewalk is shown on the east side of the street within the right of way. This must be continued to the southern boundary of the plat. Conservation Easement: A Conservation Easement was supplied by the developer for Marshan Meadows and will govern the development of both of these lots. Park Dedication: There is no land dedication needed, as Marshan Park is nearby, so the typical park dedication fee will be collected with the Development Agreement. Utilities: Sanitary sewer and water are located within Stage Coach Trail and both lots will be required to connect. The drainage and utility easement indicated on the south property line of Lot 2, Block 1 is depicted at 10 feet in width. This is in excess of what is needed for the city, which is 5 feet in width. This reduction may allow the developer to shift garage footprint closer to the property line thereby increasing the building area on the lot. This must be changed prior to the city signing and releasing the final plat mylar for the project. Grading: The grading plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments will need to be addressed to his satisfaction prior to the site being developed. The grading plan does acknowledge the Grandview project that was approved by the city earlier this year, and the applicant is working with that developer to make sure that both projects grading work seamlessly together. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat request, subject to the following conditions: 1. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 2. A development agreement between the city and the developer must be executed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the site. 3. Park dedication must be paid in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 4. A conservation easement shall be granted over the drainage and utility easement within the lots fronting Marshan Lake. Easement restrictions shall be defined prior to city council approval of the final plat. 5. The Rice Creek Watershed District must review the project prior to building permits being issued by the city for any new construction. 6. A boulevard tree shall be provided for each lot frontage. 7. The drainage and utility easement shown on the south property line of Lot 2, Block 1 shall be reduced to 5 feet in width prior to the final plat mylar being signed and released by the city. 8. The signs for the conservation easement must be in place prior to the issuance of building permits for either of the newly created lots. This review is based on the following plans and information: City Engineer Comments dated December 5, 2007 Environmental Board Comments from November 28, 2007 Marshan Meadows 2nd Plan Packet received November 9, 2007 LOTS /UNITS as of December 3, 2007 • Development Name approved prelim. plats Prelim Plat Phasin..Ians b ear lots /units to be final .fatted year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2003 -09 total maximum 1029 Stoneybrook 103 51 0 2nd Addn 0 52 52 Century Farms North 249 56 65 52 43 33 249 Keefe: prel plat, not final plat 1 1 1 Morton (minor subdiv) 0 1 0 1 Ravens Hollow 56 0 56 56 Haley Manor (10 new lots) 10 10 0 10 Crystal Cove 3 3 0 3 Millers Crossroads 152 22 47 51 32 152 Lakeview Estates (2 new) 2 2 2 Snell (minor subdivision) 0 1 1 Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th 1 1 1 Justin's Preserve 1 1 1 Marshan Estates 4 4 4 Rice Creek Church duplex 2 2 2 Rice Church: Oakwood View 10 10 10 Junes Addn 2 2 2 ighland Meadows East nd 18 18 18 Marshan Townhomes 2nd 23 23 Pheasant Hills 12th island 8 8 8 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add 1 1 1 Vaughan Addition 5 5 5 Angie's Acres (1 new) 1 1 1 Marshan Lakeview (2 new) 2 2 2 Marshan Meadows 20 20 20 Pine Glen 72 40 32 72 Cavegn (1 new lot) 1 1 1 Golden Acre (3 new lots) 3 3 3 Fran's Estate (1 new lot) 1 1 Cox Estate (1 new lot) 1 1 1 Grandview 7 7 7 Moon Marsh 3 3 3 Marshan Meadows 2nd (1 new) 1 1 1 total 51 148 176 171 141 78 714 remaining of annual 147 remaining of 1029 units for pre -2010 -1 -29 -24 6 69 147 147 315 • • • C 1 T Y I\ \\ RNCJLJ!KES Memorandum DATE: December 6, 2007 TO: Paul Bengston FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Marshan Meadows 2nd Addition Attached please find a TKDA Review dated December 6, 2007, of the submitted documents for the Marshan Meadows 2nd Addition Project. Please note that all items must be addressed prior to final approval. Contact me at 651/982 -2430 with any questions, thank you. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 • Fax: 651 -982 -2499 • • • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Marshan Meadows 2nd Addition Copies To: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Preliminary Plat Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Matt Woodruff, P.E. Proj. No.: 13810.000 Date: December 6, 2007 Routing: The following review is based on these submittals: 1. Marshan Meadows Second Addition Certificate of Survey, Preliminary Plat, and Final Grading Plan, submitted by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated November 7, 2007. 2. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Plan for Grandview Subdivision prepared by Plowe Engineering, dated November 6, 2007. 3. Drainage Calculations for Grandview w/ Marshan Meadows - Revised November 8, 2007, prepared by Plowe Engineering. General and Drainage Comments: 1. Driveway grades must be included on the Final Grading Plan. 2. Include the 10 foot wetland buffer on the plan. 3. As per the Grading notes, the silt fence exists in place as shown on the Plan and all mass grading has been completed. It appears that the silt fence location encroaches on the 75 foot shoreland impact zone, as measured from the OHWL. As per the City of Lino Lakes Shoreland Management Ordinance, at least seventy (70) percent of the shore impact zone area of new developments shall be preserved in its natural or existing state. Provide calculations showing that at least 70 percent of the shoreland impact zone has not been disturbed. If the grading disturbance of the shore impact zone is greater than 30 percent, the additional disturbed area shall be restored with native vegetation. 4. The 75 foot shoreland impact zone and wetland buffer should be delineated with permanent markers located at each property line. 5. The drainage and utility easement on the south lot line of Lot 2 Block 1 should be reduced from 10 feet to 5 feet. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity AERIAL LAYOUT MAHSHAN MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION oR: BRUGGEMAN PROPERTIES (OWNER /DEVELOPER) 3564 Rolling View Drive White Bear LAke, Mn. 55110 PHONE: (651)- 485 -6196 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, MARSHAN MEADOWS, Anoka County, Minnesota. f E. G. RUG a SONS, INC. \1911 Professional Land Surveyors www.egud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 -8200 Fax (651) 361 -8701 NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 08 -01 -07 to include the location of the OHWL behind proposed Lot 2. OHWL on proposed Lot 1 was not relocated, shown location per approved Grading Plon of Morshon Meadows by Posse Engineering Wetland located by Posse Engineering per plans of Morshon Meadows - Wetland delineation completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services (952)- 401 -8757 on 10- 19 -04. - Bearings shown ore on Anoka County datum. - Curb shots ore token at the top and bock of curb. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and /or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 40 60 ISO 030 ( 18 FEET ) 1 inch = 80 IL BENCHMARK At gage site, a 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden romp for dock. Elevation = 886.37 (N.G.VD. 1929) LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET. MARKED RLS# 25341 ® DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TX DENOTES HYDRANT pQ DENOTES GATE VALVE °- "1 DENOTES 12" CMP DENOTES WELL m DENOTES SANITARY STUB ® DENOTES WATER STUB Et DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX DENOTES WETLAND AREA " "'.::• ^ ^'"'' DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS 3 953.]6 r 1 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES FLOOD ZONE LINE DENOTES SOIL LINE DENOTES WETLAND LINE DENOTES OHW LINE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE I DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DRAWN BY: dwo JOB NO: 07361 PP I DATE II -7 -07 CHECK BY.' DW0 DWG NO: PRE -PLAT I SCANNED 0 2 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY VICINITY M14P SEC. 17, TWP. 31, RNG, 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) GUIDING - Property guiding Low Density Single Family. MUSA - Property falls within the MUSA. - No MUSA amendment proposed ZONING - Property is Zoned R -1 ZONE R I MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (OHW) = 150.00 feet ZONE R 1 MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot Area = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shoreland lot Lot Depth = 135.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feel Lot Width = 100.00 feet (corner) CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Iaws of the State of Minnesota. 1 DANIEL W. OBERMILLER Date: // /707 License No. 25341 R"PLCE NOV 0 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES PP ..,. C F,...,WT RESOURCE INVENTORY /CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY MARSHAN MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION R: BRUGGEMAN PROPERTIES (OWNER /DEVELOPER) 3564 Rolling View Drive White Bear LAke, Mn. 55110 PHONE: (651)- 485 -6196 2DNEDG� \F PNALY 00515 , 5 \N :. ,8y, `,x?BOc a ' '% EXI I G i H M . 4 sera°, i 9a J9 — BP PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, MARSNAN MEADOWS, Anoko County, Minnesoto. 70 6 r\ / I I A 11ri % A I He' 1--1 /I 1\1 I l 1 1 I \ ♦/ 1 1 1 1 1 v 991.29 1A A.r A t\ es r r ;400t$1 899 52 9 .023 t0YN Y 301 .,, Z 3pzi °'_0n, 9 pro +Il O 4.1 '30>90E' ZOD S\t‘ )44 DE,1 90` ea x9ozsa I9°s m ,,90\.99 .sw,. y10� 9°2i— — r —I x9021° 3022 90092 / 900.29 m' X320 ----- \. 'ill` 0'EiF of \-- S ‘,1‘,:F4 \P ,>i Pd° \ & 3° goNe 4:1u2 -',: F oo v 1+.e1- ,.99+" e° xgpt t8p01 �2\ 00. \ Is/ 1 3 I ZONED R CON27 011021 W 7 0016005 '.i: I.r \ \1 11 r— 4 A/ r-, r— 1 1 r -.{ %1 r -. • rx 1 1/ 11-- I r1/ 1 F Ir h- I 1 t I-- 1 • \ B�ONED R -t \ LOW DEh161TY SINGLE. FAMILY 'S^ E.G. RUD a SONS, INC. n Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 4200 Fax (651) 361 -8701 st A9 ,w v` A /1.1 -- 11.1 I 1L_ I v •,„43443 ?5 99 {A° 306. LOCATION OF WETLAND DELINEATION \ - --BY EARTH SCIENCE JAN. 2007. SJL - •LOCATION OF 883.3 OHW LINE . ;143. \2, ' NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 08 -01 -07 to include the location of the OHWL behind proposed Lot 2. OHWL on proposed Lot 1 was not relocated, shown location per approved Grading Plon of Marshon Meadows by Posse Engineering Wetland located by Posse Engineering per plans of MArshon Meadows Wetland delineation completed by Kjolhoug Environmental Services (952)- 401 -8757 on 10- 19 -04. Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. Curb shots ore token of the top and bock of curb. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and /or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of o current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 1L BENCHMARK At goge site, a 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden romp for dock. Elevation = 886.37 (N.G.V.D. 1929) LEGEND f( DENOTES EXISITING CONSERVATION MARKERS. • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25341 ® DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 75 DENOTES HYDRANT A DENOTES GATE VALVE °( DENOTES 12" CMP DENOTES WELL m DENOTES SANITARY STUB ® DENOTES WATER STUB El DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX DENOTES WETLAND AREA . -..... "" DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS x 95236 \ DRAW BY awo JOB NO: 07361PP JDATE 11 -7 -07 CHECK BY MVO DWG NO: PRE -PLAT I SCANNED ❑ 2 3 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES FLOOD ZONE LINE DENOTES SOIL LINE DENOTES WETLAND LINE DENOTES OHW LINE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE vICINIIrr MAP SEC. 17, TOP. 31. RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) GUIDING - Property guiding Low Density Single Family MUSA - Property falls within the MUSA. - No MUSA omendment proposed ZONING - Property is Zoned R -1 ZONE R I MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (OHW) = 150.00 feet CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the 399,0 of the State of Minnesota. i DANIEL W. OBERMILLER Date: /1/7ta7 License No. 25341 RECEViin NOV 0 9 2007 Cit :f +5 P P 54rud''. CAD \2,7ur'oi \4736ILS \0736I1. .17w3 1i,'7, 7 206:I4L. 1'1 i;oT PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MARSHAN MEADOWS SECOND AUDITION �R: BRUGGEMAN PROPERTIES (OWNER /DEVELOPER) 3564 Rolling View Drive White Bear LAke, Mn. 55110 PHONE: (651)- 485 -6196 / A r\ A A • I, r —I I v EXISTING HOME 1484 °3119 "E 4: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot I, Block 1, MARSHAN MEADOWS, Anoka County, Minnesota. — \NN A \P. Q0. es 505= AL SOCK 1 5 YT i',14 TP 9 Pa co ° l' x pro -- - - ---' —� - - - \ N� 896 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT rF. r- r r 4% # r- r-. Z-3.((� rF `'•. ll I ■ \/ 1 r.�/ L_ L/. \�� 1; I�— I mlo I \BB3 K :9.16 .1, EZ ,�D0 \ s \BB }� NJ0 s W AL a03� 10 , '6 AI` \ i ...15,365 DRAINAGEb,AND. UTILITY EASEMENT .� 2 ° 5830 -\\ 0,0335 N89°56'04"W 'ILL • 1/ LOCATION OF WETLAND DELINEATION \ m \ ,:',1A. -\ - BY EARTH SCIENCE JAN. 2007. r\ r- I r r '1 2\ r• .. l] r- n I -, \\(----"•117,•* - -"a X3, 7 1. 1- 1 / 1- 1 l `,1 h -- I \ /�l: F - 1 \ 1 1 iY� � -- LOCATION OF 6833 OHW LINE \ 1 \ \` 4 J. Z C ... \ .,,,A•2" pi,. - -j \` -% \ 6ik -- \ \._ % i AA � 1 1_ 1 LI INS 1 \ 1qB A I ■; I " 1 \..� \ • .. -� sld6`; • , E. G. RUG a SONS, INC. align Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 -8200 Fax (651) 361 -8701 www.eg ud.com NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 08 -01 -07 to include the location of the OHWL behind proposed Lot 2. OHWL on proposed Lot 1 was not relocated, shown location per approved Grading Pion of Morshon Meodows by Passe Engineering Wetland located by Posse Engineering per peons of Morshon Meadows - Wetland delineation completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services (952)- 401 -8757 on 70- 19 -04. - Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. - Curb shots are token at the top and back of curb. - This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additionol easements, restrictions and /or encumbronces may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of o current title commitment or on attorneys title opinion. /s >'L L 1 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTILITY EASEMENTS IS J I L Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicoted, and odjoining side lot lines, and 10 feet in width and adjoining street lines, unless otherwise Shown on the plan. DEVELOPMENT DATA - Total Plot area = 3.79 Acres - Upland within plot = 1.18 Acres (31 %) - 2 Proposed Single Family Lots - Single Family Lots = 3.79 Acres - Streets = 0.00 Acres - Averoge Lot Size = 17,788± s1 - Density = 0.52 Lots / Acre PROPOSED LOT DATA LOT - Total lot area to shoreline = 65,093 sf - Upland within lot = 23,698 sf - Arco above OHWL = 29,895 sf LOT 2 - Total lot area to shoreline = 100,144 sf - Upland within lot = 27,887 sf - Area above OHWL = 37,325 sf LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25341 m DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES HYDRANT N DENOTES GATE VALVE ' DENOTES 12" CMP DENOTES WELL 9j DENOTES SANITARY STUB IS DENOTES WATER STUB In DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX JL DENOTES WETLAND AREA DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS X 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES SETBACK LINE DENOTES WETLAND LINE DENOTES OHW LINE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE IJ DENOTES EX. & PROPOSED CONSERV MARKERS. DRAWN BY.' dwo JOB Na 07367PP IOATE: 11 -7 -07 CHECK BY DWO DWG NO: PRE —PLAT !SCANNED 0 2 3 N0. DATE DESCRIPTION BY VICINITY MAP SEC. 17, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) GUIDING - Property guiding Low Density Single Family. MUSA - Property falls within the MUSA. - No MUSA amendment proposed ZONING - Property is Zoned R -1 ZONE R I MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Loke (OHW) = 150.00 feet ZONE RI MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot Area = 10,800 sq. ft. = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shorelond lot Lot Depth = 135.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feet Lot Width = 100.00 feet (corner) BENCHMARK At gage site, o 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden ramp for dock. Elevation = 886.37 (N.G.V.D. 1929) CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, p •n or report was prepared by me or n direct supervision and that 1 a o y Registered Land Surveyor under th I ws,ohtrSf6te of Minnesota. DANIEL W. OBERMILLER Date: /// 9/07 License No. 25341 NOV 0 9 2007 P P FINAL GRADING PLAN: MAHSHAN MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION ,R: BRUGGEMAN PROPERTIES (OWNER /DEVELOPER) 3564 Rolling View Drive White Bear LAke, Mn. 55110 PHONE: (651)- 485 -6196 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, MARSHAN MEADOWS, Anoka County, Minnesota. BENCHMARK Af gage site, a 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden ramp for dock. Elevation = 886.37 (N.G.V.D. 1929) es' 1+ .04.12.1 =s': et61i,"4' nc k A A r\ /% 1 1 A A 1 1 ; 1 1 r -1 i \ �/ I I r-1 80 L. 0C AL 9�9�0 og $ \ F\1 K a^ <o P'------- oym N � ' 001` tt pe316 N ` \ar'�e '"C 1p0 4 � F�,�9S� tP ado ea N J$. 46 511 ( ..._- _. L .e96...... yyp ftr. • 30 tom. 301' • \ . ._....._.... :. ,lv \e . �tl ,s I y ", „„ / ,Sao as I,, , I wgp1� .56\55 e \ aAO 1 ° DRAINAGE AND UTILITY. EASEMENT is `@9aY 6' x02.2° Sao — Ayral r \ ' \ Ii. 1 ° 1I n .r - 'r .i•r 1..1 : EST.19T1 www.eg ud.com >s • \J„q \ 1 AL -- 14365 0RAINAG9,.AND.UTILITY EASEMENT ,lr 01 33 u Pas s4 A\ Z ®— 1^° e \ i� oto° ���444333 `�f, o'k o0o u9 0\ 0 9 g0 oo �p 40 „.0, \9 P.' \ p98O\ 2 01 /:c0 e \p es L - - --- ao \ -'L ' MoP 1 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE m w ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. PROPOSED HOUSE PAD INFORMATION =- Denotes suggested goroge side. ' -- _Denotes proposed finish grade 80 front 51 951595. - Garage floor is 0.3' above this elev. Denotes house style. -',—.Denotes low floor elevation. Denotes finish grode 80 rear of home. Finished "bsret floor Is 0.3' above this elev. on walkout homes NOTE: Minimum Lowest Floor to be 2' feet above HWL or 4' feet above OHW of odjacent lake. GRADING NOTES - Silt fence exists in place as shown on this plan. Installed as per Grading plan of Mershon Meadows. Repair and replace es needed until vegetation is established after home construction. All erosion control and sedimentation requirements and proceedures from the opproved SWPPP for Mershon Meadows apply to these lots. 01931 - Soil borings by Braun Intertec done for the MARSHAN MEADOWS development. - No mass grading proposed for this plat. All moss grading of Tots has been completed in prior approved developments. - Ponding requirements for these lots hove been fulfilled by prior developments of Mershon Meadows and Grandview. mcsts '8 • • 224 r♦ t/ 1- I I. l F." 1 / I:, i-- \I I 4 L- I nr ees>s ee ° \ ILc LOCATION OF WETLAND DELINEATION a'9a ' --BY EARTH SCIENCE JAN. 2007. \11 - -- LOCATION OF 883.3 OHW LINE JL fy t-- 1 30 9•yj1 Ps E.G. RUD & SONS, INC. Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 -8200 Fax(651)361 -8701 NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 08 -01 -07 to include the location of the OHWL behind proposed Lot 2. OHWL on proposed Lot 1 was not relocated, shown location per approved Grading Plan of Mershon Meadows by Passe Engineering Wetland located by Passe Engineering per plans of Morshan Meadows. Wetland delineation completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services (952)- 401 -8757 on 10- 19 -04. Bearings shown ore on Anoka County datum. Curb shots are taken of the top and bock of curb. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and /or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of o current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. ZONE R I MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Loke (OHW) = 150.00 feet ZONE R I MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot Area = 10,800 sq. ft. = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shorelond lot Lot Depth = 135.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feet Lot Width = 100.00 feet (corner) - Stage Coach Trail road extension to the south by others. See grading and construction plans for Grandview. DRAWN er dwo JOB N0: 07361PP'DATE: 11 -7 -07 CHECK BY: DWO DWG Na PRE -PLAT 1 SCANNED ❑ 2 3 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY VICINITY MAIP SEC. 17, TWP. 31, RNG, 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLSij' 25341 O DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 'El; DENOTES HYDRANT pd DENOTES GATE VALVE 0"®4 DENOTES 6" AND 12" CMP m DENOTES SANITARY STUB O DENOTES WATER STUB 10 DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX DENOTES WETLAND AREA S DENOTES SOIL BORING BY EG RUD 0ST /3 DENOTES SOIL TESTING BY BRAUN INTERTEC . DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS x 95536 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION x =— DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES WELL DENOTES EXISTING SILT FENCE DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (EOF) DENOTES STORM LINE — DENOTES WETLAND LINE DENOTES OHW LINE 46 DENOTES STORM STRUCTURE /RIPRAP DENOTES CATCH BASIN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE DENOTES FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE e DENOTES EX. & PROPOSED CONSERV MARKERS. l Y 7 1 e I 1 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Igws of the State of Minnesota. J .CE Vm D /�,� .2.,- DA W. OBERMILLER NOV 9 9 7007 Dat <: / / /T /07 License No. 25341 Cr\, -, ,,J ..','I; ;n7r„•n ,,071 .l1 CZn ?.III CNvr ,1'7!01,47 C 1 MARSNAN MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That Bruggemon Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of the following described property situoted in the City of Lino Lokes, State of Minnesota, County of Anoka, to wit Lot 1, Block 1, MARSHAN MEADOWS, Anoko County, Minnesota. Hos caused the some to be surveyed and plotted os MARSHAN MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION and does hereby dedicote to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. BRUGGEMAN PROPERTIES, LLC In witness whereof sold Bruggemon Properties, LLC, o Minnesota limited liobility company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 200— Paul Bruggemon President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument wos acknowledged before me this __ doy of __ ____, 200__ by Paul Bruggemon, as President of Bruggemon Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liobility company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 3 00 gn +f \ /1 /411 ~ / /^II \f 1 \/I /41 F/ `. h-I /l 1 51 -1 , I 1 11 lie 1 ■ 0 60 169.19 I hereby certify that 1 hove surveyed and plotted the lond described on this plat as MARSHAN MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION and that this plot is a correct representotion of the boundary survey, that all mathematical dots and lobels are correctly designated on the plat; that all outside boundary monuments of the plot hove been correctly set and that all other required monuments will be correctly set within one year of the recording of this plot; that as of the dote of this certificate, all water boundories and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes 505.01, Subd. 3, ore shown and labeled on the plot; and that all public ways ore shown and labeled on the plat. Daniel' W. Obermiller, Lond Surveyor Minnesoto Registration No. 25341 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificote was acknowledged before me this 1o%1 - doy of 200, by Daniel W. Obermiller, Land Surveyor. Notary Public, _ _ County, Minnesota My Commission Expire N8 03119 E 244. >4 City of Lino Lakes County of Anoka Section 11, T31, 1122 This plot of MARSHAN MEADOWS SECOND ADDITION was approved by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this d ay o f —_ 2 0 0_ and if applicable, the wri tte n comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Tronsportation and the County Highway Engineer hove been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period hos elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesoto Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By Mayor By This plot has been checked and approved this day of Lorry D. Hoium Anoka County Surveyor MARSHAN LAKE DATA BENCHMARK: AT GAGE SITE ON MARSHAN LAKE, A 60d SPIKE, 1.0 FEET ABOVE GROUND, ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF 0.5 FOOT ASH TREE AT THE INTERSECTION OF WOODEN RAMP FOR DOCK. ELEVATION= 886.37 ( N.G.V.D 1929) WATER ELEVATION: AUGUST 28, 2007 = 878.92 FEET. (N.G.V.D 1929) HIGHEST KNOWN WATER ELEVATION: 882.56 FEET (N.G.V.D 1929) ACCORDING TO RECORDS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 60 SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TWP. 31. RGE. 22 AND THE SOUTH UNE OF MARSHAN MEADOWS - - -LL —1 -� 1729.44 S8956'04'E 1 \11 1 /1 / ♦ ' 1 \/ / vitt,Ts uj INS IN' WI8 ml� Im In I 99 \O� DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS �F 1 PJ ,uLL - -- -__- ' 342 3Lc Lr‘ AIL �ul O\ e� 420 * -- e� F e 1 \ , 1 / /^, II 1 V DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT O DENOTES Yz INCH BY 18 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY RLS N0. 25341 TO BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT. \ '\ 1 / / h 90 GRAPHIC SCALE 160 IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 40 ft. 583± N89 °56'04 "W `—__� Vz ^II f \I I 1 11 / 1 F 1 / 1 // 314' For the purposes of this plot the south line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quorter of Section 17, Township 31, Ronge 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, is assumed to have o bearing of N89 °56'04 "W. 444' 914 Y9. City Clerk DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: Is J 0 sI L Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining side lot fines, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines as shown on the plat. ''In Professional Land Surveyors AGENDA ITEM 5.B. • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson P &Z MEETING DATE: December 12, 2007 TOPIC: Public Hearing: Vaughn's 1st Addition • • Preliminary Plat BACKGROUND Ed Vaughn has requested approval of a 1 lot residential subdivision to be known as Vaughn's 1st Addition. The subject site was previously approved for the Pheasant Hills Preserve No. 12 project which was not constructed and the approval has expired. The project was noticed as a Preliminary Plat, however during review of the project a number of issues have been brought to light and therefore the project will include multiple requests including a Rezoning to R -1X (Single Family Executive), a Conditional Use Permit to allow the placement of a structure within the flood plain, a Variance to the Shoreland Ordinance setback from the Ordinary High Water Level, and a Preliminary Plat for a 1 lot residential subdivision. As these other items require notice and a Public Hearing, the item will need to be continued to the January 9, 2008 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. ANALYSIS The following is a summary of the proposal: Site Area Lot 1 Outlot A Upland Area Lot 1 Outlot A Total Lots Density 30.66 acres 3.37 acres 27.29 acres 20,127 s.f. upland 20,447 s.f. upland (direct access to ruffed grouse) 1 2.17 units per acre Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site Vacant Low Density Sewered Residential Planned Unit Development North Vacant Public / Semi - Public Public / Semi - Public South Single Family Low Density Sewered Residential R -1X (Single Family Executive) East Outlot A Low Density Sewered Residential R -1X (Single Family Executive) West Single Family Low Density Sewered Residential R -1X (Single Family Executive) Growth Management, MUSA Reserve: The subject site is currently located within the MUSA boundary area. • Growth Management, Units/Year: The table attached to this report shows the status of the staging plans for final platting of new residential units. The new unit of Vaughn's 1st Addition will not be platted until 2008 and will fit within that year's allotment. Preliminary Plat Shoreland Ordinance: The subject site is adjacent to Wards Lake, which is considered a Natural Environment Lake and therefore is subject to the more restrictive Shoreland Ordinance Requirements for Lot Dimensions, Impervious Surface Coverage, and Setbacks. The lot depicted on the submitted plats meets the minimum upland lot size of 20,000 square feet, but the required setback from the Ordinary High Water Level of Wards Lake is not being met. In fact the Shore Impact Zone, which is set at 75 feet for Wards Lake is being encroached upon as well. The Shoreland Ordinance does not allow for an encroachment into the Shore Impact Zone, and therefore a Variance is required to allow the proposal to continue. However, the plans do not seem to be depicting the correct information. Staff is again asking the engineer to revise the plans to clearly identify the correct Ordinary High Water Level, Wetland Delineation, Flood Plain, and the Shore Impact Zone. Staff is conceding that a residential use of the site should and will be allowed, however the configuration proposed by the developer does not minimize the impact on the Shore Impact Zone, and potentially creates the need for another variance to allow any future development of Outlot A. Staff is requiring that a plan be submitted to prove that Outlot A can be developed in the future without the need of a major variance and minimizing the impact on the Shore Impact Zone. This would most likely need to be on the property adjacent to Birch Street, since the plans submitted clearly show that a major variance to the OHWL setback would be needed for placement of a 2nd structure at Ruffed Grouse. Floodplain Ordinance: A portion of the subject site is located within the floodplain as defined by the Rice Creek Watershed at an elevation of 887.6. The proposal for Lot 1 includes placing the building pad within the flood plain, resulting in 200 cubic yards of fill over a 3,017 square foot area of the flood plain. However, the Floodplain Ordinance also requires that any structure placed in the floodplain maintain 15 feet surrounding the structure at a level no more than one foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation for the area. This is not currently indicated on the plan, and will result in an increase in the amount and area of floodplain fill required. These plans will need to be revised to show compliance with this requirement. Additionally, a Conditional Use Permit is required by the Floodplain Ordinance for placing a principle structure within a floodplain. This will need to be properly noticed and a public hearing will need to be held. Setbacks: The submitted plans depict all required setbacks, except the 150 foot setback from the Ordinary High Water Line as required by the Shoreland Ordinance. This setback is measured to any improvement attached to the single family dwelling, including decks and /or patios. This would mean that any and all improvements would be required to stay within the building pad shown on the submitted plans. Impervious Surface Coverage: The lot will be required to comply with the 30% Impervious Surface Coverage requirement of the Shoreland Ordinance as they develop, the • current building pad and drive would put the site at approximately 14.73 %. Streets & Utilities: Ruffed Grouse is already in place and Lot 1 will have a drive way cut added to allow access to the site. Sanitary sewer and water are located within the right of way. The drainage and utility easement will need to cover the typical 5 feet on the side property lines, and 10 feet on the front. Additionally, the flood plain elevation level will need to be covered with an easement. The final location of that easement will be dictated by the changes to the grading plan necessitated to meet the Floodplain Ordinance requirement of 15 feet surrounding the structure at a level no more than one foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation for the area. Grading: The grading plan has been reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments will need to be addressed to his satisfaction prior to the site being developed. Significant changes will be necessitated by the Floodplain Ordinance requirements above. Park Dedication: There is no land dedication needed, as Quail Ridge Park is nearby, so the typical park dedication fee will be collected with the Development Agreement. Environmental Board: The Environmental Board reviewed the project on November 28, 2007. Their comments are attached. The most important of those being that they suggest increasing the lot to include a portion of Outlot A so the structure can be removed from the floodplain and the shore impact zone disturbance can be minimized. They have also requested that a tree preservation plan be submitted for the review of staff. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending continuing the public hearing to the January 9, 2008 Planning and Zoning Board with the following items needing to be addressed: 1. Issues discussed in the City Engineer review memo must be addressed to his satisfaction. 2. A tree preservation plan be submitted and reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator. 3. The developer must submit a plan demonstrating that Outlot A has enough area for a building pad that meets the city's requirements without the need for drastic variances. 4. The plans must be updated to meet the Floodplain Ordinance requirement that the 15 feet surrounding the structure be at a level no more than 1 foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation for the area. 5. The plans need to clearly identify the correct Ordinary High Water Level, Wetland Delineation, Flood Plain, and the Shore Impact Zone. 6. A Rezoning to R -1X and a Variance to the Shoreland Ordinance OHWL setback and a Conditional Use Permit for placement of a structure within a floodplain be properly noticed and scheduled for a Public Hearing. This review is based on the following plans and information: City Engineer Comments dated December 6, 2007 Environmental Board Comments from November 28, 2007 Marshan Meadows 2nd Plan Packet received November 30, 2007 LOTS /UNITS as of December 6, 2007 110 Development Name approved prelim. plats Prelim Plat Phasing plans by year (lots /units to be final platted) 2003 -09 total maximum 1029 year end 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Stoneybrook 103 51 0 2nd Addn 0 52 52 Century Farms North 249 56 65 52 43 33 249 Keefe: prel plat, not final plat 1 1 1 Morton (minor subdiv) 0 1 0 1 Ravens Hollow 56 0 56 56 Haley Manor (10 new lots) 10 10 0 10 Crystal Cove 3 3 0 3 Millers Crossroads 152 22 47 51 32 152 Lakeview Estates (2 new) 2 2 2 Snell (minor subdivision) 0 1 1 Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th 1 1 1 Justin's Preserve 1 1 1 Marshan Estates 4 4 4 Rice Creek Church duplex 2 2 2 Rice Church: Oakwood View 10 10 10 Junes Addn 2 2 2 ighland Meadows East nd 18 18 18 Marshan Townhomes 2nd 23 23 Pheasant Hills 12th island 8 8 8 West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add 1 1 1 Vaughan Addition 5 5 5 Angie's Acres (1 new) 1 1 1 Marshan Lakeview (2 new) 2 2 2 Marshan Meadows 20 20 20 Pine Glen 72 40 32 72 Cavegn (1 new lot) 1 1 1 Golden Acre (3 new lots) 3 3 3 Fran's Estate (1 new lot) 1 1 Cox Estate (1 new lot) 1 1 1 Grandview 7 7 7 Moon Marsh 3 3 3 Vaughn's 1st Addition (1 new) 1 1 1 Marshan Meadows 2nd (1 new) 1 1 1 total 51 148 176 171 141 77 715 remaining of annual 147 remaining of 1029 units for pre -2010 • -1 -29 -24 6 69 147 147 314 • Memorandum DATE: December 6, 2007 TO: Paul Bengston FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Vaughan's First Addition Attached please find a TKDA Review dated December 6, 2007, of the submitted documents for the Vaughan's First Addition Project. Please note that incomplete items 1 and 3 on the drainage review still exist and must be addressed prior to preliminary plat approval. The remaining items must be addressed prior to final approval. Contact me at 651/982 -2430 with any questions, thank you. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 • Fax: 651 - 982 -2499 TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Vaughan's 1st Addition Copies To: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Preliminary Plat Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Matt Woodruff, P.E. Proj. No.: 13810.000 Date: December 6, 2007 Routing: The following review is based on these submittals: 1. Vaughan's 1st Addition Preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, submitted by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated October 30, 2007. 2. Vaughan's 1st Addition Soil Boring Investigation, submitted by Wenck, dated October 30, 2007. General Comments: 1. The Civil Details must be the City of Lino Lakes Details. Also, include applicable details for the • sanitary sewer and water service construction. 2. Refer to the attached drainage review comments. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 fax www.tkda.com To: Matthew Woodruff, P.E. Reference: Vaughan's 1st Addition Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Preliminary Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Proj. No.: 13810.000 Date: December 3, 2007 Routing: The following drainage review is based on these submittals: 1. Vaughan's 1st Addition Preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan, submitted by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering, dated October 30, 2007. 2. Vaughan's 1st Addition Soil Boring Investigation, submitted by Wenck, dated October 30, 2007. New comments are in bold and identify additional items that need to be addressed. The following are significant issues that must be addressed prior to preliminary plat approval: 1. Submit stormwater calculations for review. Verify that the existing storm sewer system has the capacity to convey additional runoff from the proposed site. In addition, verify if downstream detention ponds receiving additional runoff from the site are sized appropriately. 2. Verify how the depth on the seasonal high water table was determined on Sheet 2. A geotechnical evaluation should be performed to verify the seasonal high water table. The lowest floor elevation is required to be 4 feet above the seasonal high ground water elevation. 12/03/07 This item has been addressed. 3. Wards Lake is classified as a natural environment lake in the City of Lino Lakes Shoreland Management Overlay Ordinance. The City requires a 150 foot structure setback and a 75 foot shore impact zone for a natural environmental lake, both measured from the OHW. Show the 150 foot structure setback and 75 foot shore impact zone on the plan. In addition, label the percent impervious cover on the plans. Additional Items (12/03/07): 4. Section 1102.07 of the City Shoreland Management Ordinance states that, "at least 70% of the shore impact zone of a new development shall be preserved in its natural or existing state." Provide calculations showing that at least 70% of the shore impact zone on Lot 1 is not being disturbed by grading activities. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • Vaughan's 1st Addition Page 2 December 3, 2007 Drainage Calculation Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 5. A three foot (3') minimum separation is required from the bottom of the infiltration basin to the seasonally high groundwater. Based on the submitted soil borings, the seasonal high groundwater was observed at approximately two feet (2') below existing grade. 6. The City may require the Applicant to submit an alternative design for this site. The final development plan alternative will need to demonstrate that floodplain fill, disturbance within the 75 foot shoreland impact zone, and encroachment of the building structure in the 150 structure setback is minimized. The following are minor plan, calculations, and drafting corrections that must be addressed prior to final approval: 1. FEMA determines the Zone A flood insurance rate zone by approximate methods of analysis only. Because no detailed hydraulic analyses have been performed, no base flood elevations are shown within this zone. Clarify how the FEMA flood zone A elevation of 886.0, as labeled on the Grading Plan, was determined. 2. Label Rough Grouse Street on the plan. 3. Show the location of the rock construction entrance and inlet protection on the Grading Plan. il4. Include a silt fence detail and inlet protection detail on the Plan. 5. Include a note on the Plans indicating that all adjacent streets must be inspected daily and swept clean of sediment tracked from the site. 6. If an NPDES permit is required for this site, submit a copy of the permit for the City's records when available. 7. Contact Rice Creek Watershed District to determine if a permit is required for this project. If required, submit a copy of the RCWD permit for the City's records when available. Additional Items (12/03/07): 8. Show the soil boring locations on the Plans. 9. Label the wetland buffer on the Plan. 10. The "Ordinary High Water Elevation" callout on the Grading Plan, Sheet 3, should be labeled as a "100 -year high water elevation ". 11. Any disturbance within the wetland buffer area shall be restored with native vegetation. 12. The silt fence encroaches on the wetland delineation boundary at the northeast corner of the • lot. Revise the drawing to show the silt fence outside of the wetland delineation boundary. 13. Label the infiltration basin on the Plan. Vaughan's 1st Addition Drainage Calculation Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 3 December 3, 2007 14. Clarify the design criteria for the infiltration basin and submit design calculations for review. 15. Provide a cross - section detail of the infiltration basin on the Plans that includes information such as the depth and type of soil mixture. 16. Include notes on the Grading Plan incorporating the following: 1) the proposed infiltration basin should be staked off and marked during construction to prevent heavy equipment from compacting the soil, 2) the infiltration basin should not be excavated to final grade until the contributing drainage areas have been constructed and fully stabilized, and 3) final excavation of the infiltration basin should be completed using light tracked equipment to avoid compacting the basin floor. 17. To provide a well aerated, highly porous surface, the soils of the infiltration basin floor should be loosened to a depth of at least twelve inches (12 ") prior to planting. 18. It is highly recommended that temporary erosion control blanket be used in the infiltration basin to help prevent the seeds from floating and being transported downstream. • • • • Memo Environmental To: Paul Bengtson From: Marty Asleson Date: 11/29/07 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations of November 28, 2007 Environmental Board Recommendations for Vaughn First Addition The following recommendations were made by the Environmental Board at the November 28th Environmental Board meeting: 1. Location and elevations of the treatment pond must built to the verified OHW and seasonally high ground water indicators with adequate (3 feet) separation between the bottom of the pond and the seasonally high ground water. 2. This site should be designed in a treatment train approach. 3. The bottom of the treatment pond proposed must be at least three feet above stained soil layers. 4. Follow the Shoreland Overlay District requirements. 5. A tree preservation plan has not been submitted and must be submitted before any allowed soil disturbance. 6. The following pollution prevention measures should be taken: • A concrete truck wash -out area must be indicated on the plan, and marked in the field with a sign. • Page 1 • • • • A method of keeping lot sediments on the site must be indicated in the plan, through either daily street sweeping or 5/8 "- clear, rock entrances. (Detail on Sheet 5). • Silt fence must be properly installed and maintained when the fence becomes 1/3 full. 7. Infiltration basin and restoration of natural vegetation areas that are disturbed out of confirmed need for construction must be seeded with the city native seed mix. 8. No importing or exporting of soils may be allowed without city approval. All soils brought into the site must not be substantially different from soils that were used to calculate storm water volumes. 9. The footprint of the house should meet the standards of the shoreland overlay district. Suggest moving the house pad to include part of Lot A. 10. Forward to Planning and Zoning with the feeling that this application is incomplete without a tree preservation plan. Motion: To approve recommendations and forward on to Planning and Zoning by DeHaven, second by Andrzejewski. All were in favor. Motion passed. • Page 2 • • • - Vaughan \2003.0010 \09\55 \PRE 4 ;z OD GO b 589'59'42 "E 1314.91 VA UGHAN'S 1ST ADDITION N89 °34'47 "E 719.26 6 /0.02 f t m: LOT 1 - 147,236 sq. ft I. - • yw,u" ert t - 338 as ve • e"-- i Edge Of NbU.,e 4. D.6n.ot.d ■ 011.0a*ber 211007 --- --- -j �` / ' I . • • •10 D&H'�� EASMENT -I Br Menak Auoclates sw.„ x M, 644.89 M - • • ,,� - -RCND oh B.te9e : 687.6 j Ordinary MO Nb1.r Elewfbn: 8517 - �_ -O&TL•OTA - -The Southwest comer of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, Sec. 28. Twp. 31, Rge. 22 670.02 _ - 1,188,883 Sq. fl' - ��\ 27129 ones • d f k.V - ---- .442 6 • EASEMENT N89.57'53 ":7 \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION (CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CASE #242520) Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that port of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, being in the West One -half of the Northwest One- Quarter, Section 27, Township3l, Range 22. Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the West One -holf of said Northwest One- quarter, Section 27; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West along the East line of said West One -half, Northwest One - quarter, Section 27, a distance of 57.73 feet to the Southeast comer of soid Outlot D for a point of beginning of the troct to be described; thence North 01 degree 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the East line of said Outlot D, a distance of 910.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 580.47 feet; thence South 01 degree 00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D, a distance of 548.90 feet; thence North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49 seconds East, parallel with the South line of said Northwest One- quarter, Section 27, a distance of 416.00 feet; thence South 01 degree 00 minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of sold Outlot D a distance of 370.14 feet to the Northerly right -of -way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10 (Anoka County Right -of -Way Plat No. 11); thence North 85 degrees 24 minutes 36 seconds East along said right -of -way line a distance of 28.66 feet; thence continuing along said right -of -way line along a curve concave to the North (which has a rodius of 2879.72 feet, a delta angle of 02 degrees 00 minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 136.02) a chord bearing and distance of North 86 degrees 24 minutes 53 seconds Eost, 136.01 feet to the point of beginning. And EXCEPT the North 1100 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, Minnesota. And EXCEPT the South 400 feet of the North 1500 feet of the Eost 600 feet of Outlot D, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Anoka County, Minnesota. LINO LAKES FEMA ZONES -per FEMA PANEL NO. 270015 0010 B, effective date: May 17, 1982 ZONE A -Areas of 100 -year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard foctors not determined. ZONE C -Areas of minimal flooding OWNER/DEVELOPER Edward E. Vaughan & Dolores E. Vaughan 1432 Pheasant Hills Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55038 SURVEYOR Metro Land Surveying & Engineering 248 Apollo Drive Suite 100 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 TOTAL ACREAGE 1,335,920 Sq. Ft. = 30.66 Acres • 0 892 -9- Shore Impact Zone: 17,065 sq. ft. Area above OHWL: 22.112 sq. ft. Compensatory Storage Area: 1,985 sq. ft. Total Upland Lot Area: 20,127 sq. ft. The Southeast comer of the NE of the NE 1/4, Sew 28, Twp. 31, Rge: -22 LEGEND DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL DENOTES DITCH LINE DENOTES OVER HEAD LINE DENOTES POWER POLE DENOTES TREE LINE = DENOTES SHORE IMPACT ZONE M 6- ea The Southwest comer of the NW 1/4- 09 Sew 27, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 • Edgi Of WetMd --- sax:•, -',,f - OUTLOTA . . 1,188.683 sq. ft. - 27.29 acres. Eo ro 7 A - - LOCATION MAP 800 to scow ti4?" CS.6.4. 80.10 Cj- r c rri ccr 1` SECTIONS 27, & 28, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. N89•34'47 "E 600.0 f 0 100 200 ALE N FEET i-Edge Of NYt6md • kY-IbP ---- - - -- - -The South Inc of the NW 1/4 of Sew 27, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 R 1e' FES h, G. EDGE OF WETLAND = -. N / cs =L= 129.36= __= ?°_'__� R =5669.58 A =1'f8'25" . Nlla 10.1 R'\ S89'39'11 "W 580.47 -------- --7 - -- The Southeast comer of the -, W 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Sec 27, Twp. 31, Rg --s'L RECEIVED NOV 3 0 2007 con Z u N °° 4 =_to f= L Z c N > QLJ W N o J aM JMA PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKED 5 a� 0 P90EC7 2003.001 DATE 11/29/07 1 6 a g g VA UGHAN'S 1 ST ADDITION RESOURCE INVENTOR Y 30 60 SC IN FEET LOT 1 sEa- FEMA FLOOD ZONE 'A' ,("SOIL TYPE Rf) Edg Of Wetland As Delineated By Wenck Associates On October 23, 2007 ,u. SOIL TYPE Du HdC2 Rf NAME DUNDAS LOAM HAYDEN FINE SANDY LOAM RIFLE MUCKY PEAT r0u J 8' N. -- RCWD Floodplain,Elewation: 887.6 - Ordinary High Water El e va tion: 883.7 \1,1t- / /7 ' BO ° O N. O(177LOT A 4 vA — — ✓ ', H0 BI 6• LB HD (O u Au 8' iB' 8 �I 9' BI _ .. {„ CO -&-' - . 12 FEMA FLOOD ZONE t. UPLAND A"EA` tN� B0 (SOIL TYPR Rf) Bz �9' B3" r cQ - - - \1 'd 1 , ,•:., s�B sSrB e BI �" r 6✓HI (S011,17,,,..,,TYP„,,,,,. L E dC2)` c.-,,..„,,8 BO . n -r F 7I' BI BI i " tiwt B' BI ii S` 2•,_ B1 10y C° 10' Cn 10' BO uv c ,I- -8' BI ;� 8" ' 18' 2t1 , l µ, 4 125 CO 7' HI l8 Bl `r: 1' BI i . 5 ?.. B/. �\ .' 7' ti N 'V,I i -`5 BL c, `d! CO 6' BI, \ - I �...DYw r~ BI V PL, 20' CO \ s• sI C'r' �, BI 14' L4- ''sL4 10' c�.�s;8' CO �/ CO ato u Yom". /t 1` �7;' BI - - BI 6' HI •UPLAND AREA { > g 1 6—B .- r ca -.. , 7, at _ M 01 ' ',-8'.111,\A-- 6' BI -i /(SOIL,' R D 2 CO ry 8' CO 5' BIrs 9'`tH vr,_ io' CO eU '- ii' rr 1 DEPTH TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE 2 -3 FEET 2 -6 FEET 0 -1 FEET /ouse\ y " ^o t4 N CO 14; % / ' /// / ,, Au- SECTIONS 27, & 28, TOWNSHIP 31, RANCEy 22 �ryF� ANOKA COURT N, W� NOV 3 0 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES VAUGHAN'S 1ST ADDITION DATE REVISIONS I hereby certify that this pIo,�,�p`��� specification or report wort ®47A✓ d[ G° by // (4 --1 a or under my dir ^4• Ion d'`� ED VAUGHAN thatIemoduly fe&3 z a , MLSE N o LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA En snee U n 7 of lhb 8 c e a N _9 P _9— 1432 PHEASANT HILLS DRIVE "' " ^° ,3 `J Mex. Land S Surveying ° g 7C RESOURCE INVENTORY LINO LAKES, MN 55038 , Metro K N-� weo.M w.i.n.p..e...•• w.u. xw n,em nm.mxe W,un[va, wQ+sfo�ams ti a ee.er roWemes • . . - ID . DA U4 N0. 45815 1/ tin re. anA.a..a. 008 _PAGE — OEMNEO DRAM KTG KTG PROJECT 2003.001 11/29/07 2 VA UGHAN'S 1ST ADDITION GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 0 30 60 SC AISA LOTS ASA Edgg Of frVetland As Delineated By Wenck Associates - On October 23, 2007 ae4 / f, 00DPLAIWL FILL X200 C`( ''. \:01 PG EMEND \ \ c 1 FLOODPLAIN "; CWPENSATORY STORAGE = 204 CI,- dic s, Total Lot Area: 147,236 sq. ft. Total Impervious Area: 2,964 sq. ft. Impervious Surface Coverage: 2.01X Upland Lot Area: 20,127 sq. ft. Upland Impervious Area: 2,964 aq. ft. Upland Impervious Coverage: 14.73% Shore Impact Zone Area: 17,065 sq. ft. Grading Area Within Zone: 12,565 sq. ft. (73.6%) Floodplaln Fill Area Within Zone: 3,017 sq. ft. (17.7X) GRADING NOTES RCWD Floodplain Elevation: 887.6 -Ordinary High Water Elevation: 883.7 a is \\ L &J• , _, ...,::,^1. �� 5E410 GAR: 895.0 LFE: 891.0 FEE: 895.7 O&TL_ O T A V� 1 I � '1•'11 1C ' eit. 894.5 \� THE EXISTING WELL SHALL BE REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. PROPOSED CONTOURS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG EXISTING CURB DENOTE TOP OF CURB. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION I5 NOT TO BE REUED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTIUTIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES WHICH CONFUCT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (1 -800- 252 -1166) 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE TREES TO BE SAVED. SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, NE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS, THE BROKEN UMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY LASTING DAMAGE. NO TREES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION BY THE ENGINEER. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP, STOCKPILE AND RE— SPREAD SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM FOUR INCH DEPTH TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. THE PROPOSED GRADING PLAN INDICATES FINAL GRADING AFTER THE HOUSES ARE CONSTRUCTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A HOLDDOWN OF 2.25' ACROSS THE BUILD PAD LOCATIONS DURING THE GENERAL GRADING OF THE SITE THE FINISHED BUILDING SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.10 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE PROPOSED ELEVATION. STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION. AREAS TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.10 FEET OF THE REQUIRED ELEVATION UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN Si INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY — NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE A C0— APPLICANT WITH THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIRED INSPECTION REPORTS AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPDES PERMIT AND THE SWPPP FOR THIS PROJECT. EROSION CONTROL NOTES R OCK- CONSTRUGTIQN ENiRANCE� A / '" N t THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. ALL EROSION CONTROL AND SILTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA'S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING, BUT NOT UNITED 70, STAKED STRAW BALES, ROCK ENTRANCES AND /OR SILT FENCES. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY 7HE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES: ALL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OVER MAY, AT HIS /HER OPTION, DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR IN HIS/HER METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS AND BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON THE SITE HAVE BEEN RESTORED. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL TO BE PLACED AROUND STORM DRAIN STRUCTURES DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AS NECESSARY AND MUST BE REMOVED IF DESIGN CAPACITY HAS BEEN REDUCED BY FIFTY PERCENT. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR DURATION OF PROJECT. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER, NOT TO BE SODDED AND GREATER THAN EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT, SHALL HAVE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC INSTALLED. WHEN THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH THOSE AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER WITHIN 48 HOURS OF GRADING COMPLETION. THE SEEDING SHALL COMPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION NO. 3876, AT A RATE OF 50 LBS /ACRE THE SEEDED AREA SHALL BE MULCHED. THE MULCH SHALL APPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3882, TYPE 1. THE MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AND ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION NO. 2575.3, F1. MULCH SHALL BE APPUED AT THE RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. THE MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH A DISC, CLODBUSTER OR OTHER APPROVED EQUIPMENT. HAA GRADING LEGEND SF 1.3% EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS SILT FENCE DRIVEWAY SLOPE N FEET -4)-1 45, rtb LOCATION MAP NOT 10 SCALE CSJJ4 60.10 N C) 4, 4- Ntk 4,'I J 1 SECTIONS 27, & 28, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. INFILTRATION NO1 ES A. WHEN THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED AND MULCH THOSE AREAS AS DIRECTED BY 711E OWNER WITHIN 48 HOURS OF GRADING COMPLETION. THE SEEDING SHALL COMPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION NO. 3876 AT A RATE OF 50 LBS /ACRE. THE INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM SHALL BE SEEDED WITH NDOT SEEDING MIX 350. THE SEEDED AREA SHALL BE MULCHED. THE MULCH SHALL APPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3882, TYPE 1. THE MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AND ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION N0. 2575.3, F1. MULCH SHALL BE APPUED AT THE RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. THE MULCH SHALL BE ANCHORED IITH A DISC, CLODBUSTER OR OTHER APPROVED EQUIPMENT. ALL FILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE KEPT OFFUNE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE. -� IS W4U 0 S N THE CI'T'Y OF LINO LAKES B. HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE KEPT OUT OF IN COMPACTION OF SOILS. C. THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE GRADED FIR INSTALLED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NE INFILTRATION CAPACITY IS MAINTAINED DURING CON! TRATI "SA - tUCTI 84 VAUGHAN'S 1ST ADDITION LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA DE9wED KTG PRO.EC1 1 2003.001 DATE 11/29/07 0600 3 VAUGHAN 'S 1 ST ADDITION UTILITY PLAN 1 1 LOT 1 ‘-‘•- 1 •,,. 1 _..., .._ ,. '7_ V'S°\h >A-- • N , ..-- ---- ---- -,, ....---- -- -- ---.--c-....--t_r_J— -- -----,_--k --.,. ----.. --- ,:-. At • J.' / .. , ' ' 2 IN r .- . _.„ _ N, : , \ Jul • Edgg Of Wetland As Delineated By Wenck Associates On October 23, 2007 LA, LS, RCWD Floodplain Elei/ation: 887.6 .----Ordinary High Water Elevation: 883.7 _.(o* ; I , / 421V-t SOR-2.5 PVC / / / 77/ I --89 0 1,71ta- / / / r 17777., ) \ SEM GAR.. 895.0 LEE: 891.0 FEE: 895.7 ER., • 2.00T4 INVLB87.91 UTILITY NOTES c-• 0 - — EL Ir WORRY PING *PC 1587.07t QU s e\ , / CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS V LASTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. ALL DUSTING UTIUTY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002) FOR UTIUTY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. UTIUTY CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE UNE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEVER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA AND ALL STANDARD DETAILS FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE TO BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (P.V.C.) SOIL 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SANITARY SEWER WYES SHALL BE 8 INCH BY 4 INCH SCHEDULE 40. SANITARY SERVICES SHALL BE 4—INCH SDR— 26 P.V.C. ALL WATERMAIN PIPE TO BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (D.I.P.) CLASS 52 UNLESS OTHER VA SE NOTED. ALL WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 1—INCH. TYPE "K" COPPER. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS—BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. AS—BUILT INFORMATION SHALL INCUJDE ELEVATIONS OF ALL SANITARY SERVICE ENDS. 5■OE1AR1 Mf1 803 OM; eu.se / \ ,OUTL 0 T A /J/'/ UTILITY LEGEND -- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN 0 EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING HYDRANT • • • • PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE I I I I I f PROPOSED WATER SERVICE • PROPOSED CURB STOP / 0 30 60 LOCATION MAP NOT 10 SCALE I .0.1. N0.10 I 42. 4* L — %I.' qfl 14 SECTIONS 27, & 28, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22 AN OKA COUNTY. MINNESOTA. RECEIVED NOV 3 0 2007 iNCD LAKES U) E2 0 0 Z v)::(9) z D z «C1 > cf)11 o w 0- CD (NJ Z PO _I 1ST ADDITION LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA KTG UTILITY PLAN DRAM KTG PROJECT 2003.001 DATE 11/29/07 4 • • \v,opcw \20003-2100$ \2003- vaugnan\2003.0010\aa\E5\aw Mons RE J VED Nov 3 0 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES 0 1ST ADDITION V) z LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA • CIVIL DETAILS DESIGNED DRAM KTG KTG PROF-CT 2003.001 DATE 11/29/07 SHEET , 5 3 "X3 "X5' WOOD MNDOT 2573. TYPE PREASSEMBLED, ERUALX 'SITE EQUAL - FASTEN 1D' MIN. -�- SILT FENCE, STOP' FABRIC OR TO STAKES .. —... - — •• —N —N= � -_ _ 1' OF NO SCALE rlllr ,irllljlpj1 QG.F� illlll111!b1' ,' SJ�Q -vim ,!i1! p 4.-' \7 - _ '.- . ". ` S. u; `: - '/7� _ .,. �' INFILTRATION BASIN REVEGETATION A CflAOW0 BECOME - 05050 l5WIN0 SHALL BE DONE N CONJUNCTION NMI TIE 057 OF 1110 351E EXCAVATE WHIN D 0.3' OF FINISHED LDADC LAY WIT pt PIIBBER -IEED EgNPMENT. FINAL DRADND CF SASH SHALL BE DELAYED UNTIL AREIA IS ALLOWED. aSITE E: FINISH ISH GR AND SILL ND rnELOOR 70 AIDN IM BASH NSA S MI AFTER FINISH GRADING. TILL 111E BASIN A RAT 70 A MINIMUM DEPTH S OF B NO6 E TOPSOIL YNO O EQUIPMENT MAT 5 0 0 A FCR O (F E BASS Ofl AS AFER G BT 1IE ENMNFER. NO T MAT BE ARE ACROSS THE BASIN FLOOR AFTER GRADING AxD TURF ESTABUSHMENi OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETE BNDD TURF NUSN ENT ROUGH V W D 1°SIIF�0000 SAM AREA 000 NORMS S uTABLIS0H FL GRADING AND NBF ES1NIt15lYQlT VOW 6 DOPE MD 1F(kTAiION 6 ESTABLISHED 0. TURF ESTABUSwwT - SEED BATH MNDOT MIX 350 OR MY APPROVED MIXTURE, IN ACCDNDNICE VIII 01Y REYARFYENTS. RAKE SEED IN MTH A MKT HARROW ON ALL AREAS BELOW THE Bw CONTOUR D. AU. RE- VESfATON SNAIL COMMENCE WHIN 7 DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. {!'A'Iblllir�lfl!Id 11 I, {I'llr�l!I' jj i11i1!h' pNlgl 25 MIN. RADIUS 6" EXISTING -� Li S MINIMUM 1" — 2" WASHED ROCK 50' OR GREATER - r , PUBUC ROAD STAKES O B' O.C. EXISTING GRADE _ :N— N........ .,_ ....-ii 1` o i I`• N f _ r PROPOSED = ACKFILL ...— ...- BURY BOTTOM FABRIC EMBANKMENT SILT FENCE REQUIREMENTS FABRIC AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 3888 8' MAXIMUM SPACING BETWEEN STAKES 2' MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF STAKES 1' MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF FABRIC 3 "X3 "X5' MINIMUM DIMENSIONS OF WOOD STAKES DUTY SILT FENCE PER MNDOT SPEC. 3888 AS REQUIRED GROUND MEEM MERE .,, ,. ... ., Y. - ?:: MEIN Mffiffl 6" MIN. 1.5" OR 2" CRUSHED ROCK SILT FENCE INFILTRATION NOTES MLSE No. 901 ROCK CONSTRUCT1ON WOOD POST MLSE No. 500 ENTRANCE MLSE No. 510 RE J VED Nov 3 0 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES 0 1ST ADDITION V) z LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA • CIVIL DETAILS DESIGNED DRAM KTG KTG PROF-CT 2003.001 DATE 11/29/07 SHEET , 5 • • • AGENDA ITEM 5.C. STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul F. Bengtson P & Z MEETING DATE: December 12, 2007 TOPIC: Variance to allow a reduced side yard setback for a detached accessory structure (garage) where 5.0 feet is required. Kenneth Muehlstedt 2221 Reiling Road Section 5, Subdivision 2 of the City of Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance requires that a 5- foot side setback be provided for all accessory structures. The property owner was notified that a portion of the structure was encroaching on the setback. He requested a Variance in 2005, was recommended for denial by staff and the Planning and Zoning Board, and subsequently withdrew the application before it went to City Council. He then removed what was thought to be the offending portion of the structure, the west five feet of the shed addition. In the fall of 2007 the neighboring property owner again brought up the issue of the setback and it was reviewed by staff. It was at this time that the property owner was informed that the setback of the garage itself was believed to be deficient and this application came about. At this time staff is unable to identify the specific variance that is being requested as a new survey had not been completed prior to this staff report going out. When the building was proposed the city did not require the submission of a survey. Simple line drawings indicating the required setback are acceptable, as long as the property owner can demonstrate to the building department that they do know the location of property lines. This is done by finding property monuments that are placed in the ground when the subdivision is platted by the developer. As such, the property owner believed to be meeting the appropriate setback, and represented enough evidence to the building official to lead them to believe that as well. Since the neighboring property at 2215 Reiling Road was vacant at the time, it wasn't until the lot was developed that anyone noticed the discrepancy. The new structure built on that site was required to submit a survey both prior to and following construction. This as -built survey depicts the previously removed portion of the detached accessory structure at 2221 Reiling Road, and handwritten updates done by Kurth Surveying nearly two years after the survey was completed, indicate that the fence on Mr. Muehlstedt's property was encroaching on the neighbor's property. These are the reasons why Mr. Muehlstedt was asked to complete a new survey of the property line. • Muehlstedt Variance December 12, 2007 page 2 BACKGROUND 4/21/1987 A building permit was issued for a 26 -foot by 30 -foot (780 square foot) detached accessory structure (garage) for the subject property. ? / ? ? / ? ? ?? At some point the property owner built a 10 -foot by 30 -foot (300 square foot) addition to the rear of the garage without obtaining the proper building permits from the city. (Permit was eventually obtained) 1/24/2003 The city received, as part of a building permit application for the adjacent property to the west, a certificate of survey from Kurth Surveying, that depicted the properly permitted structure and the attachment both within the five foot setback area as required in the R -X (Rural Executive) zoning district. 4/23/2004 The City of Lino Lake's Building Department contacted the resident at 2221 Reiling Road in regards to the certificate of survey submitted for the construction of a single family dwelling at 2215 Reiling Road. This survey depicted a portion of the existing detached accessory structure (garage) setback 1.2 feet from the side property line. The resident was informed that the structure would either need to be made to meet the 5.0 feet setback, and if it were to remain in any way, the resident would need to obtain a building permit. 9/17/2004 The City of Lino Lake's Building Department again contacted the resident at 2221 Reiling Road on September 17, 2004 to reiterate the options for the existing detached accessory structure (garage). 11/24/2004 The Community Development Department received an application for this Variance request to allow a 1.2 -foot side setback for a detached accessory structure (garage) where 5.0 feet is the minimum required by the zoning ordinance. 1/12/2005 The Planning and Zoning Board voted to recommend denial of the Variance request. 3/22/2005 Mr. Muehlstedt had a property sketch completed by Hult & Associates. This document is attached, and clearly states that the existing property line monuments do not match the corresponding recorded distances shown on the plat for the Otter Lake Hills subdivision. 3/24/2005 Mr. Muehlstedt withdrew the Variance request prior to it continuing to City Council. 3/30/2005 Mr. Muehlstedt obtained a demolition permit to remove a portion of the shed addition to bring it into conformance with the five foot setback requirement, and obtained a building permit for the addition. Staff and the property owner both believed that this completed enforcement on the issue and closed the case. After this was completed the neighboring property owner requested that the city review the structural integrity of the shed addition. It was determined that the shed addition was not structurally sound and would need to be corrected. 8/30/2007 Structural repairs proposed by Mr. Muehlstedt were reviewed by both the City's Building Official and a Structural Engineer and determined to be adequate. • • • Muehlstedt Variance December 12, 2007 page 3 BACKGROUND (Continued) 8/31/2007 The neighboring property owner raised the issue of the setback for the original garage, which was not believed to be encroaching into the setback area and requested that the city enforce its ordinance. 9/05/2007 The City's Building Official inspected the structural repairs to the shed addition and determined that they were completed in accordance with the previously reviewed plans. Therefore the shed addition to the garage meets all of the city's ordinances and is no longer an issue. 10/01/2007 The Community Development Department informed Mr. Muehlstedt that the existing garage was believed to be closer than five feet to the property line and that a Variance would be required to allow it to remain in its current state. 10/17/2007 Mr. Muehlstedt submitted an application for a Variance to allow the existing structure to remain. 10/17/2007 The neighboring property owner raised the issue that Mr. Muehlstedt's fence was actually sited over the property line. 10/23/2007 Staff requested that Mr. Muehlstedt obtain an updated survey so that the extent of the encroachment could be clearly identified. 10/26/2007 The city's Building Official informed the City Council and City Attorney of the review process of Mr. Muehlstedt's shed addition. This memorandum is attached, and staff considers this issue to be closed. 10/29/2007 Kurth Surveying issued an update to the 2004 survey of the neighboring property. This update is hand written and states that the location of Mr. Muehlstedt's fence was known to be encroaching when the survey was completed, but no information as to this fact was shown on the survey at the time. This survey indicated that the fence encroaches as much as 0.3 feet onto the neighboring property. 11/14/2007 The neighboring property owner attended the Planning and Zoning Board meeting to speak at open mike. They expressed concern over the delay in having the action heard, and over the structural repairs to the shed addition that were completed by Mr. Muehlstedt. Staff explained that an updated survey would be the best avenue to define the Variance requests. As of September 5, 2007 the shed addition was considered to be completely in compliance with the city's ordinances and is therefore not an issue. 12/07/2007 Mr. Muehlstedt has not received nor submitted the new survey from Metro Land Surveying. This should follow the packet the beginning of next week. • • • Muehlstedt Variance December 12, 2007 page 4 LAND USE AND ZONING The following table summarizes the zoning and land use of the subject property, as well as surrounding properties: Location Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Subject Property Rural R -X (Rural Executive) North Rural R -X (Rural Executive) East Rural R -X (Rural Executive) South Rural R -X (Rural Executive) West Rural R -X (Rural Executive) VARIANCE FINDINGS In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a finding of fact: a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. c. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Staff is not prepared to base findings on the survey information submitted with the application. It is our intention to wait for the new survey information before establishing any findings or making any recommendations. RECOMMENDATION The item should be continued to the January 9, 2008 Planning and Zoning Board meeting. ATTACHMENTS Location Map Applicant's justification letter Building Official's memorandum dated October 26, 2007 As Built Survey for 2215 Reiling Road submitted November 5, 2007 Existing Condition Sketch for 2221 Reiling Road submitted October 17, 2007 • • Location Map — 2221 Reiling Road Deer Pass Trait \ o / / A/ 1 ill 1.k ,• at t . — t 41, . ,/' 111 lig rTh le Kenneth Muehlstedt 2221 Reiling Road Lino Lakes, MN 55110 612- 240 -5178 October 15, 2007 RE: Variance Application To whom it may concern: In 1984 the City of Lino Lakes through TKDA & Associates (TKDA) contracted out the installation of Reiling Road to Northern Asphalt. Northern Asphalt sub- contracted the removal of trees and the grading of the road to Dell Contracting; while bulldozing the road, Dell Contracting removed all the front survey pins up and down Reiling Road. I informed John Davidson of TKDA that the survey pins had been removed and Mr. Davidson sent out a survey crew to replace the pins. At the time, Reiling Road dead -ended at my property and only my survey pins were replaced. In 1987 I applied for a permit to build a 26 x 30 garage; I based the placement of the garage on TKDA's survey which at the time was well within the five -foot setback. In 1992 Reiling Road was extended west beyond my property. In 2002, Sally Bachmeier and Lloyd Chalupsky purchased lot 10 adjacent to the west of my property. Ms. Bachmeier and Mr. Chalupsky informed me that the northwest corner of my garage was 6 to 8 inches off the setback; they said they didn't have a problem with it but wanted me to be aware of it. There have been numerous disagreements between us which resulted in Ms. Bachmeier and Mr. Chalupsky bringing legal action against me and in turn the courts found that "the Plaintiffs' testimony lacking in credibility ". After losing two trials and an appeal, the setback and other issues became a problem to Ms. Bachmeier and Mr. Chalupsky. A permit was issued for my garage and was inspected and approved by the City of Lino Lakes building official Mr. Pete Kluegel; Mr. Kluegel based his inspections on the same survey done by TKDA. A recent survey done by Hult & Associates (see - attached survey) states "the plat of Otter Lake Hills does not meet the standards set by Minnesota Statue 505 ... ". I am asking for a variance on a very small portion of my garage that was constructed over 20 years ago (see enclosed digital photographs). Also enclosed you will find photos of my driveway which has also been questioned as to the setback requirements. See enclosed survey that shows the driveway setback at 7'1 "; the radius on the west side is closer to the property line but is in the 15' right of way. Respectfu y, Kenneth Muehlstedt Enc. • • • Memorandum To: City Council Members Scott Baumgartner, City Attorney From: Peter Kluegel Building Official Date: October 26, 2007 Re: Garage Shed Addition In the spring of 2004 after reviewing a Certificate of Survey for 2215 Reiling Road, a letter from my office was sent to Ken Muehlstedt, 2215 Reiling Road. The reason for the letter was that a portion of Mr. Muehlstedt's detached garage was only 1.2 inches from the side property line. It was discovered that an 8 x 30 = 240 sq. ft. shed addition to the existing detached garage (26 x 30 = 780 sq. ft.) was constructed without any permits. Mr. Muehlstedt applied for and then withdrew an application for a variance to the required 5 foot setback. Mr. Muehlstedt then removed 5 feet from the shed addition after obtaining a building permit to meet setback requirements. In 2007, Mr. Lloyd Chalupsky, 2215 Reiling Road, questioned the structural integrity of the shed roof support. I then had an on -site meeting with Mr. Muehlstedt to discuss additional roof support. After submitting a structural fix for the roof support, a meeting with Ken Muehlstedt, Dan Kelsey (State of Minnesota Building Codes Structural Engineer) and myself was scheduled to review the proposed fix. After doing some loading calculations, Mr. Kelsey's opinion was that the proposed fix was adequate. On Wednesday, September 5, 2007, a final inspection was completed on the support system. IvuV uu V/ I LW Iel r\ullII JuIVyiIIIJ., ilia. • • / VJ -I UU -I VUL 1" CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Kt TH SGRVEMQ (MEASUREMENTS SHOW IN FEET AND DECIMALS OF A FOOT 4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. THIS I S NOT A BOUA'OARY SURVEY ' COLJMBIA FfJGHiS, MN . 55421 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLOT PLAN VAS PREPARED BY HE DR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION , THAT THIS PLAN CORRECTLY SHDVS THE PLACEMENT OF A PROPOSED BLILDING ON THE LAND HEREON DESCRIBED AND THAT 1 AU A DULY LICENSED LAND SLRVE UNDER THE LAOS D_c•- STAT OF MI DTA. Rorcy L. Kurth. .L.S. No. 20270 Russell J Kurth, L.L.S. No. 15113 11` g - o`\ NAg1`"?' = r)'-2 9,6,L:T L6\1 N 1 Dpl dle-I y' 20" rr OUIL.'r / ®gam,./ Al 0x GRADES GARAGE SLAB TOP OF BLOCK = BASEMENT FLOOR = — 1W, — — 0,.TO t- 01.1TDU roo0 ROLL. W call 0 - u =41N�L (LNLI 3a—tT ` wove ¶ Nun TY3 — • (763) 786-9789 7AX (763) 78B -750 DAT= Z�17 -*DP O I RON MONUMENT ICsA,N0 BEARINGS ARE PER P_AT • = SPIKE SET EXISTING ELEVATION ( I = PROPOSED ELEV. = DRAINAGE ARROW (m ?: r'7[r›,501Zl qC O 30 - 'OS SCAL V FEET -9,N R\'ivtS(2- p 10-2°1 -07 -93`1 -AODeD W17o1? \ L LOCATION i ern 1 FI[r..V INti o TA r.4-1-1 l0 2q -20°4 93y.z x� c ti *'•-• • � q'Lb jh,Y Ste„ 1 ct - • ati° 1-0''1, — 4'./ /7' 0.'1a. • 11' .� V.. • wQv0 FG+iLL o_• tEPhT Di- Ll rv‹ %r J c r t Er(O FCNLt= I h EF P0.o PART'( Lk N is I E -glq,2 'S R o0 ctApR 'ti 0,,-- r E! • • • GRAPHIC SCALE 0 20 40 80 1 INCH = 40 FEET UNNIVON OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AS OF 2/16/2005 FOR: KENNETH MUEHLSTEDT PART OF LOTS 10 & 11, OTTER LAKE HILLS, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 120 174=199.38 P =200 7' au < M< A 01 97 � 9Z IS n C as a g M= 200.29 P =200 M =99.70 P =100 po R.-'to i i CA' S-'i t-i-' 6 3*. ,N ' .‘"1-E) v1' 1.2±- START OF VINYL FENCE - --, 7± 11 HOUSE & GARAGE cc 9.Sf" START OF WOOD FENCE - - -, WE L® FOUND SPIKE- -, M= CH =55.74 M=44.76 CH =56.6 REILING 'BO z NOTE: THE PLAT OF OTTER LAKEHILLS DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET BY MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE 505, AS EVIDENCED BY FIELD INVESTIGATION AND AS SHOWN HEREIN, EXISTING MONUMENTATION DOES NOT MATCH CORRESPONDING RECORDED DISTANCES SHOWN ON THE PLAT. THIS DRAWING SHOWS EXISTING CONDITIONS AS OF 2/1612005, WITH RESPECT TO EXISTING CONDFOONS, THIS OFFICE RECOMMENDS COMPETENT LEGAL ADVICE AS TO REMEDIES APPROPRIATE TO SAID CONDDION. NOTE: THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EXISTING MONUMENTS IN -PLACE BEYOND THOSE SHOWN HERE THE SCOPE OF 11-1I5 SKETCH PREVENTED FURTHER SEARCH AND RECOVERY OF SAID MONUMENTS. NOTE: NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO COME TO ANY POSITIONAL CONCLUSIONS CONCERNING MONUMENTS SHOWN AS "FOUND" ON THIS SKETCH. CONSIDERABLY MORE FIELD INVESTIGATION, THAN IS AFFORDED BY THE CURRENT WORK AUTHORIZATION, IS NEEDED BEFORE ANY CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN. THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO SHOW "MEASURED VERSUS PLAT RECORDED DISTANCES IN A LIMITED AREA WITHIN THE PLAT OF OTTER LAKE HILLS. , D N£ -a Nio-a Re v LEGEND • DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND. UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE M DENOTES MEASURED P DENOTES PLAT \X� DENOTES FENCE LINE HULT & ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYORS ENGINEERS. & WETLAND SPECIALISTS FOREST LAKE, MN DATE: 3/22/2005 STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: TOPIC: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM VI D Jeff Smyser December 12, 2007 Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit: Planned Unit Development Preliminary Development Plan/Preliminary Plat Conditional Use Permit: Motor Fuel Station Conditional Use Permit: Car Wash Conditional Use Permit: Outdoor Dining (McDonald's) Conditional Use Permit: Outdoor Dining (Coffee Shop) Main Street Village, Azure Properties Azure Properties has submitted a proposal for a planned unit development (PUD) called Main Street Village. The proposal includes creating four commercial lots on a portion of 28 acres of property at the southeast quadrant of the I -35E interchange at Main Street. Development on the remaining 19 acres has not been designed. However, because of stormwater and transportation planning needs, the use of the entire site must be considered. The P & Z discussed this project as the concept plan phase of the PUD process in August. A revised layout for the project was submitted in October. The zoning ordinance defines two types of PUD: rezoning and conditional use permit. A commercial PUD can be approved as a conditional use permit. The site is within the area analyzed by the I -35E Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). The AUAR's mitigation plan requires some information and review criteria that typically are not applied to development projects elsewhere in the community. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Zoning Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use (Comp. Plan) Zoning Site vacant Commercial GB General Business North vacant Commercial GB General Business South vacant, industrial, and City's water tower Industrial LI Light Industrial East Patriot Bank and Ad Graphics Commercial and Industrial GB General Business & LI Light Industrial West I -35E Commerc. (across I -35E) GB (across I -35E) • • • Main Street Village page 2 Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan guides the project site for Commercial land use. The site is within a Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area and is within the existing Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Zoning: The site is zoned GB General Business. A PUD allows for flexibility from standard zoning requirements. The following table compares the project to standard zoning requirements. With a shopping center, normal setbacks are difficult to measure because some lots do not front on public roads, and it is difficult to determine which lot borders are the side and rear lots. Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR): This site is within the area analyzed by the I -35E Corridor AUAR. Development within the area is subject to the mitigation plan adopted with the AUAR. The mitigation includes some specific, quantified requirements, but many of the requirements are means of achieving the best results possible, depending on the site. Conservation Development Framework: The Conservation Development Framework provides the foundation for most of the conservation objectives within the AUAR area. Implementation of the Framework will: conserve the most ecologically significant natural resources within the AUAR area (in particular, the "core" and "outlier" habitats); protect ecologically significant natural resources from adjacent land uses by implementing buffering; and connect ecologically significant natural resources via multi - functional greenway corridors. The goals of the Conservation Development Framework will be pursued through a variety of methods. The maps in the AUAR provide summary information and guidance. For example, the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System map (AUAR Fig. 10 -1) shows artificial surfaces and associated areas on the sites of the bank and the old farmhouse; planted or cultivated vegetation across most of the site; and herbaceous over the larger wetland areas. GB Zone Proposed PUD lot size minimum 20,000 sf 35,000 sf to 130,000 sf lot width 100' 170'+ on private roads 200'+ on public roads building setbacks from local street from collector rear lot line side lot line between buildings 30' 40' 30' 10' avg. height of the two bldgs. 30'+ from private road 40' 20' -30' 20'+ 45' bldg. height 45' less than 25' with 31' peaks impervious max. 75% 60% (excluding Outlots B & D) Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR): This site is within the area analyzed by the I -35E Corridor AUAR. Development within the area is subject to the mitigation plan adopted with the AUAR. The mitigation includes some specific, quantified requirements, but many of the requirements are means of achieving the best results possible, depending on the site. Conservation Development Framework: The Conservation Development Framework provides the foundation for most of the conservation objectives within the AUAR area. Implementation of the Framework will: conserve the most ecologically significant natural resources within the AUAR area (in particular, the "core" and "outlier" habitats); protect ecologically significant natural resources from adjacent land uses by implementing buffering; and connect ecologically significant natural resources via multi - functional greenway corridors. The goals of the Conservation Development Framework will be pursued through a variety of methods. The maps in the AUAR provide summary information and guidance. For example, the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System map (AUAR Fig. 10 -1) shows artificial surfaces and associated areas on the sites of the bank and the old farmhouse; planted or cultivated vegetation across most of the site; and herbaceous over the larger wetland areas. Main Street Village page 3 • The Wetland/Aquatic and Upland Habitats map (AUAR Fig. 10 -2) does not show any core or outlier habitat areas that we want to preserve. • Water quality, stormwater management, erosion and sedimentation: The AUAR includes analyses of surface water runoff issues which lead to requirements for including infiltration elements and other techniques. It also includes estimated stormwater management recommendations for specific development areas. These estimates in the AUAR cannot be considered strict requirements. However, they do provide guidance for mitigation. The mitigation plan establishes sizing criteria for stormwater management areas that are designed to support wetland complexes or large infiltrating surfaces with native plant populations. The approach is that these areas would be designed consistent with strict criteria for maximum filtration and/or infiltration of stormwater. The site is labeled development area Y -TD in the AUAR. The most general estimate suggests that 16 % -20% of the developable area would be needed for stormwater management (AUAR Fig. 17 -3). A somewhat more refined estimate suggests a need of 5 acres for stormwater management (AUAR Table 17 -5). These estimates are calculated for the entire 28 -acre site and are high compared to standard development practices. The submitted project only includes about a third of the total site (less than 9 of the 28 acres), so it is difficult to compare against the AUAR. Nonetheless, we can see that stormwater treatment is a challenging issues and it is important to consider the entire site rather than individual pieces. While those stormwater management areas are estimates and not mandatory, the AUAR does include specific requirements. Runoff rates must be at or below pre - development conditions. This is a standard requirement everywhere in the city, enforced on all projects. The AUAR also requires that runoff volume must be no more that 150% of pre - development runoff. The AUAR also requires that stormwater management areas have a 6:1 slope rather than the normal, steeper slope. These are being reviewed by the City Engineer. Archaeological Survey: A Phase 1 cultural resources survey was completed for the site and submitted with the project, as required by the AUAR. The farmstead site was found to be not eligible for historic listing. The survey investigators recommend that no further cultural resources work is necessary. AUAR Fee and Environmental Review: The City Council adopted a fee for new development within the AUAR area. This fee was based on the cost of the AUAR and calculated by anticipating that growth will occur first in the Stage 1 and 2 growth areas. The fee is $269 per acre, and 28.3 acres x $269 results in a fee of $7612. The fee goes toward the costs of preparing the AUAR and is justified because no environmental review is needed for projects within the AUAR area as long as the projects are consistent with the development assumptions in the AUAR. If the AUAR had not been prepared, the standard environmental review rules would apply. The submittal includes about 37,000 sf. A retail commercial project of 200,000 sf or more • would require an EAW. It is possible though unlikely that development of the full site would cross that threshold. However, the City would have the ability to require an EAW if there may be the potential for significant environmental effect. • • • Main Street Village page 4 Planned Unit Development Section 2, Subd. 10. of the zoning ordinance includes the PUD standards. The zoning ordinance provides for two types of PUD. We have used a rezoning PUD on mixed use projects and others with exceptional design issues such as conservation developments in urbanized areas (with city utilities). We also have a provision for a conditional use permit for a PUD. A commercial residential PUD is allowable under this option. It is important to review the purpose and intent of a PUD. Subd. 10. PUD, Planned Unit Development. A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for the grouping of lots or buildings for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development. This section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of Tots, buildings and activities, which promote the goals outlined in the Comprehensive Plan or serve another public purpose. It is further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance of parking, open space and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses. ... The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage: 1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. 6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations. E. Commercial or Industrial Planned Unit Development, CUP Requirements. 1. Purpose. It is the intent of this section to further the directives of Section 2, Subd. 2 and establish special requirements for the granting of a conditional use permit to allow flexibility from the strict provisions of this Ordinance in regard to multiple buildings, shared access/ parking, parking supply reductions, internal setbacks, etc. • • Main Street Village page 5 The following summarizes the project proposal: Gross Site Area 28.3 acres Upland Area 24.0 acres Wetland 4.3 acres Currently Proposed Development Area including Outlot A 8.7 acres Lots: The table lists the submitted data. This reflects revised lot sizes and a new wetland delineation for the large wetland on the southern portion of the site. Water and Sanitary Sewer: The project will be served by municipal utilities. Ample capacity exists in the systems. Water looping through the development ultimately will be needed for proper flow. Whether or not the system must be looped in this first phase is being determined. Wetlands and Stormwater Management: The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) approved the delineation of the wetlands and the mitigation plan in 2006. However, that mitigation plan application did not include wetland fill and mitigation necessary for the future access route (with the southern driveway). Since this will be the main access to the retail center in the future, it is vital to know if this `road' can be constructed. The wetland impacts and mitigation are an integral part of this question. A new wetland delineation was submitted to, reviewed, and approved by the RCWD. This included an amendment to the delineation of the large, southern wetland. Drainage and utility easements must be established that cover and extend 10' beyond the wetlands, in accordance with City requirements. There will be an easement over the incidental wetlands in Outlot C because they will become stormwater ponds. gross sf gross acres upland sf upland acres Lot 1, Block 1 35,175 0.8 35,175 0.8 Lot 2, Block 1 55,831 1.3 55,831 1.3 Lot 1, Block 2 66,196 1.5 61,169 1.4 Lot 2, Block 2 130,031 3.0 130,031 3.0 Outlot A (private road) 96,058 2.2 96,058 2.2 subtotal 383,291 8.8 378,264 8.7 Outlot B 677,301 15.5 588,452 13.5 Otter Lake Road ROW to be dedicated 4,393 0.1 4,393 0.1 Outlot C 55,779 1.3 7,238 0.2 Outlot D 113,302 2.6 67,896 1.6 total 1,234,066 28.3 1,046,243 24.0 Water and Sanitary Sewer: The project will be served by municipal utilities. Ample capacity exists in the systems. Water looping through the development ultimately will be needed for proper flow. Whether or not the system must be looped in this first phase is being determined. Wetlands and Stormwater Management: The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) approved the delineation of the wetlands and the mitigation plan in 2006. However, that mitigation plan application did not include wetland fill and mitigation necessary for the future access route (with the southern driveway). Since this will be the main access to the retail center in the future, it is vital to know if this `road' can be constructed. The wetland impacts and mitigation are an integral part of this question. A new wetland delineation was submitted to, reviewed, and approved by the RCWD. This included an amendment to the delineation of the large, southern wetland. Drainage and utility easements must be established that cover and extend 10' beyond the wetlands, in accordance with City requirements. There will be an easement over the incidental wetlands in Outlot C because they will become stormwater ponds. Main Street Village page 6 • There is no designated floodplain on the site as shown on the FEMA map. The plans show little space for snow storage after plowing. A snow storage area must be designated or snow must be completely removed from the site. This report discusses the AUAR requirements for stormwater management in a previous section. Roads, Access, Traffic, Circulation: A traffic study was prepared for the development. The study analyzes the current proposal (phase one), full development of the site (phase 2), and year 2030. The study assumes the existing bank road will be a full access point with phase one of the development, but be converted to right- in/right -out only with phase two. As to the southern access, it will function properly with a stop sign with full development but will require a traffic signal by 2030 because of the increasing background traffic. The intersection of Otter Lake Road and Main St. will function well until 2030. The AUAR's traffic analysis also recognized that this intersection will fail at that time. That is, this will occur without the proposed Main St. Village project. This is an important transportation planning issue that will require the attention of both County and City. It likely will require further improvements such as additional lanes on Main St. The plan includes an additional five feet of right of way dedicated for Otter Lake Road as well as a triangle for future needs at the Main St. intersection. This is shown on the plans. The site ultimately will have four access points: a right -in only slip ramp from Main St.; the existing access on Otter Lake Road north of the bank; a new access on Otter Lake Road north of the water tower; and the service road along I -3 5E. The internal circulation design has changed significantly since the concept review. Some issues remain, some have been resolved, and new issues have arisen from the change. • The "slip ramp" into the site from Main St. was negotiated with the Anoka County Highway Dept. as part of the CSAH 14/8 improvement project and the I -35E interchange project. This access will allow vehicles to leave Main St. to enter the site, but not exit the site onto Main St. It will not pose a safety problem on Main St., but there are some issues to consider. • The slip ramp route continues south and intersects with the existing bank access road. In the first layout, this was be a four -way intersection, with traffic continuing unimpeded on the bank road but a stop sign for southbound vehicles on the slip ramp road. The October plan shows the bank road ending in a "T" except for a driveway entrance to the larger retail building lot, L2 B2. This is a significant revision. The intersection has a stop in all four directions and, perhaps more importantly, the most direct traffic flow is no longer west to east but north and south. The applicant's traffic study shows that the major vehicle entrance movement ultimately will be west to east on the bank road in 2030. Even at phase 2, the bank road and the slip ramp entrance will be about the same. Main Street Village page 7 vehicles entering site during weekday PM peak hour source: Westwood Professional Services The count for vehicles entering the site are not the only factor to analyze. However, over half of the traffic entering the site in 2030 will enter via the bank road.. These data are important when looking at internal circulation routes and the potential for vehicles stacking out onto public roads. If the entire southern road and access are constructed with phase 1, these data likely will change for phase 1, but the phase 2 and 2030 data will not change. • After the initial S -curve on the slip ramp, there are two driveway intersection points on the entry road before it meets the road north of the bank. The first driveways are placed near the end of the slip ramp. The second driveway intersection is about 85' further south, and the road intersection is about 60' past the driveway. A fast food drive through, gas station, and car wash have important circulation needs in addition to normal retail parking. These needs must be met with safe access and circulation. The traffic analysis showed volumes at entry points. Additional analysis information was submitted in November showing turning counts within the development. Staff is considering this data in reviewing the circulation in this area of the project. During the concept review, staff suggests that the roadway be narrowed to 20' like the slip ramp itself and kept as one -way to the south as far as the second set of driveways. This would keep the traffic from Main St. flowing in one direction as far as the second set of driveways, allowing ample stacking distance before meeting vehicles traveling north. The applicant has responded that the one -way arrangement would not allow for trucks to access the buildings because trucks cannot make the turns into the southern driveways. They submitted several truck circulation drawings in November that show the proposed routes, but do not demonstrate that other routes are not feasible. In addition, one drawing seems to show that truck access through the southern driveway will work for the gas station. We are working with the applicant to resolve these issues. • The existing access road along the north side of the bank will become right- in/right -out in the foreseeable future. Otter Lake Road will be reconstructed in this area in order to accommodate future traffic, and at that time a median will be created. It is possible that Anoka County could require that the existing access be converted to right - in/out with this initial portion (phase one) of the project. Either way, the second, southern access on Otter Lake Road is a key element as it will be the primary access to the development area. This means we must know that the second access can be constructed. We received the geotechnical information (soil borings) for this, and it is possible to build the new access route. The specific timing of the construction of the second access in relation to the phase 1 phase 2 2030 slip ramp entrance 189 189 189 46% 36% 23% bank road entrance 220 187 473 54% 35% 58% southern entrance 0 154 154 29% 19% source: Westwood Professional Services The count for vehicles entering the site are not the only factor to analyze. However, over half of the traffic entering the site in 2030 will enter via the bank road.. These data are important when looking at internal circulation routes and the potential for vehicles stacking out onto public roads. If the entire southern road and access are constructed with phase 1, these data likely will change for phase 1, but the phase 2 and 2030 data will not change. • After the initial S -curve on the slip ramp, there are two driveway intersection points on the entry road before it meets the road north of the bank. The first driveways are placed near the end of the slip ramp. The second driveway intersection is about 85' further south, and the road intersection is about 60' past the driveway. A fast food drive through, gas station, and car wash have important circulation needs in addition to normal retail parking. These needs must be met with safe access and circulation. The traffic analysis showed volumes at entry points. Additional analysis information was submitted in November showing turning counts within the development. Staff is considering this data in reviewing the circulation in this area of the project. During the concept review, staff suggests that the roadway be narrowed to 20' like the slip ramp itself and kept as one -way to the south as far as the second set of driveways. This would keep the traffic from Main St. flowing in one direction as far as the second set of driveways, allowing ample stacking distance before meeting vehicles traveling north. The applicant has responded that the one -way arrangement would not allow for trucks to access the buildings because trucks cannot make the turns into the southern driveways. They submitted several truck circulation drawings in November that show the proposed routes, but do not demonstrate that other routes are not feasible. In addition, one drawing seems to show that truck access through the southern driveway will work for the gas station. We are working with the applicant to resolve these issues. • The existing access road along the north side of the bank will become right- in/right -out in the foreseeable future. Otter Lake Road will be reconstructed in this area in order to accommodate future traffic, and at that time a median will be created. It is possible that Anoka County could require that the existing access be converted to right - in/out with this initial portion (phase one) of the project. Either way, the second, southern access on Otter Lake Road is a key element as it will be the primary access to the development area. This means we must know that the second access can be constructed. We received the geotechnical information (soil borings) for this, and it is possible to build the new access route. The specific timing of the construction of the second access in relation to the • Main Street Village page 8 phasing of development on the site is important because this route is important for the overall circulation of the site. It should be built with phase one. • Lino Lakes has a joint powers agreement with Anoka County that limits the number of accesses that will be allowed on Otter Lake Road (Co. Rd. 84) between Main Street. and Cedar Street. We can have a total of six driveways and three roads. There are five driveways now and two roads. We would prefer to use the allocation wisely. We have suggested that the new southern access on this development site be planned to allow for access to the City's water tower. This would allow the elimination of the existing water tower driveway onto Otter Lake Road: the water tower driveway would be on the new access `road'. An easement to allow City access to the private road is needed. • After meeting with the applicants, we received a sketched revision to the October plans. This shows a reconfiguration to the access to the large retail site. Access to the coffee shop drive through windows would be through the lot's parking lot exclusively. That is, vehicles could not turn west out of the southern gas station driveway to go to the drive through window. This is an improvement to circulation in this location. Coffee window patrons would not be held up by vehicles leaving the gas station, which in turn would need to wait for vehicles stacked at the southbound stop sign. Parking: The site plans show the lot layouts and parking. The zoning ordinance does allow for a reduction in the number of required parking stalls if the applicant demonstrates through a peak parking analysis that the peak demand is less than the normally required number of stalls. A peak parking analysis submitted with the October submittal seems to support the reduced number of parking stalls. The analysis does not address the gas station/car wash lot, so we have to look at that lot by itself and need to ascertain how much square footage should be included in a parking calculation. In addition, there is some reduction of parking on L2 B2 if it is revised as shown in the November e- mailed revision. We are examining the submittals and will discuss the peak parking analysis further with the applicant's consultant. Buildings: The proposal includes four buildings on four separate lots. All the buildings are attractive with brick, rock face block, stucco, EIFS, and metal peaks. A variety of colors and design elements are proposed. The original submittal in May included "Architectural Design Criteria." These are a very good basis for the project. There are a few revisions that would be needed to comply with the City's architectural requirements for commercial buildings. •Lot 1, Block 1, Retail (sheet A2): The proposed 6500 sf retail building includes rock face block and precolored 4" block along with EIFS. We have no colors for this building, which must be supplied. The tallest parapet on this building is 22' high. The building was revised since the first submittal to include glass on the north elevation and we have colors now. The colors and materials establish a visual base - middle -top. The trash location is connected to the building. *Lot 2, Block 1. McDonald's (sheets A2.0, A2.1): The proposed McDonald's building has face brick and EIFS. The brick colors are a typical brick red with dark forest Main Street Village page 9 • green setting off the drive- through windows. The EIFS will be white. Modernized golden arch elements rest over the entrances and large windows. The majority of the building is 18' 3" high. The "tower" element rises up to 21' 4" with an arch that rises another 2'. The restaurant building footprint is 4590 sf with the trash area and cold storage connected to the south end of the building. • A drive through window is a permitted use in the GB zone. Plan revisions on the north end of the building show a patio providing access to the door and an outdoor seating area. This area requires a CUP, as discussed below. The drive- through lane is immediately next to the door location and we will want to ensure there is an adequate barrier for safety reasons. The commercial building architectural standards in the zoning ordinance prohibit EIFS from being closer than three feet to the ground, and EIFS must not comprise more than 30% of the front of a building. Changing the lower 3' would reduce the percentage of EIFS on the north (front) facade. In addition, the south wall does not include any differentiation of base - middle -top other than the cornice along the top of the cold storage and trash areas, which only extend across part of the building on that side. A few minor revisions would ensure the attractive features apply on the entire building. •Lot 1, Block 2, Kwik Trip With Car Wash (sheet A5 and others): Both buildings have red brick walls with tan brick courses for visual variety. The store has a wide stucco band as well. The metal peaks are green. The store is 21' high with 31' peaks. The trash enclosure is attached to the car wash. The store has base - middle -top features in varying degrees on different walls. A motor fuel station requires a CUP, which includes standards for the canopy. A car wash also requires a CUP. These are discussed below. •Lot 2, Block 2, Retail (sheet Al): The large retail building has 4" precolored block, rock face block in two colors, and EIFS of several colors. It includes the base - middle -top design elements, though the west elevation color scheme was not submitted. This building is 22' high with arched features several feet higher. The trash enclosure is attached to the building. There is a drive - through window on the north elevation intended for a coffee shop. A drive through window is a permitted use in a GB zone. The circulation of the site for a drive through was discussed by staff and the applicant. We received a sketched revision, but not full plans of the revision. This requires further attention. A patio behind this building shown on a previous plan has been removed. Our understanding is that table seating for a coffee shop would be on the sidewalk on the east side. Outdoor seating needs a conditional use permit, and is discussed below. Signage: The submittal included signage specifications. We commend the early consideration of signage as part of the project design. There are several elements of this signage plan that will need to be amended to comply with the City's sign ordinance, including the gas station canopy, among others. Staff will confer with the applicants on these items. Main Street Village page 10 • We also will need to establish the locations of monument and/or pylon signs, and show them on the revised plans. • Park Plan and Park Dedication: The parks plan shows Natural Resource Protection Areas corresponding to the locations of wetlands as revealed by the wetland delineation. These are wetland areas that will be protected by existing wetland law. As noted above, the wetland mitigation plan has been reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District. The protected wetlands will be covered by a drainage and utility easement. In August, the P & Z expressed the desire to see pedestrian and bike access to and through the project. This is worth examining because of the trails existing and planned on the abutting roads. The Park, Greenway, and Trail System plan shows a trail along Otter Lake Road and a bikeway and linking trail along Main Street. There is an existing trail on the east side of Otter Lake Road. There is an existing trail on the north side of Main St. starting at Otter Lake Road and going east. There is no trail currently abutting the project site. The Main Street/Otter Lake Road intersection is a good crossing point because it is signalized. However, getting to the project site should be addressed. Pedestrian and bicycle access to and circulation within the project is not indicated on the submitted plans. Park dedication for commercial development is $2175 per acre. For development that includes 24 acres of upland, this would be over $52,000. Dedication cash can be credited for trail construction that is part of a development project. Conditional Use Permits Several CUPS are needed for the project: a motor fuel station, a car wash, and two outdoor seating areas. The actual requirements in the Zoning Ordinance are attached to this report or reference. Motor Fuel Station: Section 7, Subd. 3.H.7. lists the requirements for a motor fuel station conditional use permit. The submittal complies with many of the CUP requirements. Unresolved issues are discussed below. The building meets the architectural standards. However, the submitted canopy design does not comply with our requirements on the following points: • The fascia cannot be more than three feet in vertical height and the submittal is almost four. • The canopy may have contrasting color bands not to exceed an accumulative width of four inches. The submittal shows two bands of about six inches each, totaling approximately twelve inches. • The canopy lighting must be recessed. We do not have details or fixture cut sheets for the canopy lights. The ordinance requires that at least 25% of the lot used exclusively for the gas sales facility shall be landscaped. The car wash is on the same parcel, so some judgment will be needed. Main Street Village page 11 • However, we do not have landscaped area percentages for each lot, so we will need this data for Lot 1, Block 2. • • The CUP standards for a motor fuel station include several access and circulation requirements. Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement. The site design must accommodate adequate turning radius and vertical clearance for a semi - trailer truck. As noted above, the access and circulation on the site is still under discussion. This must be resolved. Car Wash: The CUP requirements for a commercial car wash are listed in Section 7, Subd. 3.H.3. To summarize: a. The site will be served by sanitary sewer. b. The architecture is consistent with the surrounding buildings. c. Stacking space must accommodate the number of cars that can be washed in 30 minutes. We will need to ascertain this information. d. Landscaping along residential property is not an issue on this site. e. Screening of stacked cars from residential property is not an issue on this site. f. The site will be paved according to typical City requirements. g. The drainage of the area must meet City requirements, including the AUAR mitigation plan. h. Lighting effects on abutting residential properties is not an issue on this site, but lighting fixtures must meet City requirements. i. Vehicular access to the car wash is through the gas station site. As long as that is resolved, there are no car wash access problems. j. The site is next to an interstate freeway and an interchange with county state aid highway. Car wash noise is not an issue. Outdoor Seating, Lot 2, Block 1 (McDonald's) and Lot 2, Block 2 (retail building): The Zoning Ordinance requires a CUP for "restaurants with accessory outdoor dining facilities" in Section 7, Subd. 3.H.12. The ordinance does not distinguish between outdoor seating areas where full service is provided at the tables and outdoor seating where the patrons purchase food inside and bring it outside and eat. For now, staff included these CUPs in the public hearing notice and recommends discussing the CUP requirements just to ensure the issues are formally considered and addressed. The standards are written to apply to a restaurant on an individual commercial parcel. It is important to remember the purposes of a PUD: "to provide for the grouping of lots or buildings for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development....By allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance" a PUD is intended to promote "a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations." In the future, the City may want to specifically exclude outdoor tables without service from the need for a CUP. This is a clarification that should be made in the ordinance, and we can address that when we do some major ordinance revisions in the near future. • • Main Street Village page 12 The ordinance requirements and staff comments follow: a. The applicant submit a site plan and other pertinent information demonstrating the location and type of all tables, refuse receptacles, and wait stations We know where the patio would be for the McDonald's, but have no information for the retail building. Additional information would need to be provided. b. Access to the dining area be provided only via the principal building if the dining area is full service restaurant, including table waiting service If full service is to be provided, access must be only from the building, not directly from the sidewalk. This is not an issue at McDonald's, but we do not know what is planned for the other building. This would need to be determined. c. The size of the dining area is restricted to thirty (30) percent of the total customer floor area within the principal structure. The McDonald's patio is about 50% of the inside customer area. We have no information for the other outdoor seating area d. The dining area is screened from view from adjacent residential uses in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. e. All lighting be hooded and directed away from adjacent residential uses in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of this Ordinance There is no adjacent residential area to be screened or protected from lighting. f. The applicant demonstrates that pedestrian circulation is not disrupted as a result of the outdoor dining area by providing the following: 1) Outdoor dining area shall be segregated from through pedestrian circulation by means of temporary fencing, bollards, ropes, plantings, or other methods, and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 2) Minimum clear passage zone for pedestrians at the perimeter of the restaurant shall be at least five (5) feet without interference from parked motor vehicles, bollards, trees, tree gates, curbs, stairways, trash receptacles, street lights, parking meters, or the like. 3) Overstory canopy of trees, umbrellas or other structures extending into the pedestrian clear passage zone or pedestrian aisle shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7) feet above sidewalk. On the McDonald's site, there should be a railing to prevent pedestrians from wandering into the drive through lane. Passage to the door is easily ensured by locating tables appropriately. Two linden trees are proposed on the patio. On the other site, we have no information for the other outdoor seating area. g. The dining area is surfaced with concrete, bituminous or decorative pavers or may consist of a deck with wood or other flooring material that provides a clean, attractive, and functional surface This is easily addressed, though we have no specific information on either site. h. A minimum width of thirty -six (36) inches shall be provided within aisles of the outdoor dining area. We have no specific information. • • • j• Main Street Village page 13 Storage of furniture shall not be permitted outdoors between November 1 and March 31. Outdoor furniture that is immovable or permanently fixed or attached to the sidewalk shall not be subject to the storage prohibition of this section. However, any immovable or permanently fixed or attached furniture must be approved as part of the administrative permit application. We have no furniture information. Additional off - street parking shall be required pursuant to the requirements set forth in Section 3, Subd. 5 of this Ordinance based on the additional seating area provided by the outdoor dining area. No additional parking was added in the shared parking analysis for patio areas. It may not be appropriate to do so on this project, though this is not yet determined. k. Refuse containers are provided for self - service outdoor dining areas. Such containers shall be placed in a manner which does not disrupt pedestrian circulation, and must be designed to prevent spillage and blowing litter. We have no information. It would be appropriate to require additional information about the outdoor seating areas. However, as this project is a PUD, the outdoor seating areas can be approved using flexibility from the strict provisions of the zoning ordinance. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION Stormwater management was the focus of the Environmental Board discussion on July 25. This included the importance of the design of the stormwater facilities, such as infiltration and filtration features. In addition, the AUAR requirement for volume control must be addressed in the project design. There also was consideration of revising the landscape plan to substitute some tree species and ensure plantings in infiltration areas are appropriate. The project was reviewed again on November 28. The comments are attached. RECOMMENDATION Open public hearing, take comment, continue public hearing to January 9, 2008. This project is somewhat complex and requires a number of separate approvals. A number of issue remain to be resolved before staff can recommend approval of the project. The following should be addressed: 1. The complete data and analysis included in the peak parking analysis must be submitted to ensure that the peak demand is less than the normally required number of parking stalls. Square footages of retail area also must be submitted for the gas station. • • • Main Street Village page 14 2. Stormwater management must be consistent with the goals and requirements of the AUAR mitigation plan. 3. A permit must be obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to site work and the project must comply with all permit conditions. 4. Landscaping plan revisions should address the recommendations of the City Forester and Environmental Board. 5. Several site access and circulation issues must be resolved. Vehicle and truck access and circulation must be demonstrated to be adequate for the site and the project overall. 6. Pedestrian and bicycle access to the site and circulation within the site must be included and shown on plans. 7. An easement for access to the water tower via the southern access to the development must be granted to the City to allow the elimination of the existing water tower access on Otter Lake Road. The access deed must be submitted prior to site work commencing. 8. The southern road must be constructed with the first phase. 9. Snow must be removed from the site or adequate storage area created. 10. The commercial building architectural standards in the zoning ordinance prohibit EIFS from being closer than three feet to the ground. This must be corrected on the McDonald's building. 11. The south facade of McDonald's should be re- examined for the possibility of incorporating a base - middle -top appearance. 12. Any comments from the Anoka County Highway Department should be addressed. 13. The motor fuel station canopy fascia cannot be more than three feet in vertical height. A new design must be submitted for review prior to approval by the P & Z Board. 14. The motor fuel station canopy may have contrasting color bands not to exceed an accumulative width of four inches. A new design must be submitted for review prior to approval by the P & Z Board. 15. The motor fuel station canopy lighting must be recessed. Details or fixture cut sheets for the canopy lights must be submitted prior to approval by the P & Z Board. 16. Data must be submitted indicating the landscaped area of Lot 1, Block 2. 17. Information on the number of vehicles that the car wash can service in 30 minutes must be submitted. • • • Main Street Village page 15 18. Information on the location, area, and set up of the outdoor seating on Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 must be submitted for review. 19. The submitted signage plan ( "Signage Specifications ") must be amended to comply with the sign ordinance and monument signs must be located on plans. A revised signage plan must be submitted for review prior to approval by the P & Z Board. 20. The submitted "Architectural Design Criteria" must be revised to ensure that the requirements in the Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 4.B.4., are fulfilled. 21. City Engineer review comments must be addressed to his satisfaction prior to approval by the P & Z Board. This review is based on the following submittals: 1. Existing Conditions & Resource Inventory, rec'd October 26, 2007 2. Preliminary Plat, rec'd October 26, 2007 3. Preliminary Site Plan (two sheets), rec'd October 26, 2007 4. Preliminary Utility Plan (two sheets), rec'd October 26, 2007 5. Preliminary Grading & Erosion Control Plan (three sheets), rec'd October 26, 2007 6. Details, rec'd October 26, 2007 7. Preliminary Landscape Plan and Details (two sheets), rec'd October 26, 2007 8. Preliminary Infiltration Details, rec'd October 26, 2007 9. Preliminary Lighting Plan, rec'd October 26, 2007 10. Building Elevations, Sheets Al, A2, A1.0, A1.1, A2.0, A2.1, A5, and two more unnumbered sheets, and color renderings received October 26, 2007 11. Phase 1 Cultural Resources Survey, April 12, 2007, rec'd May 8, 2007 12. Traffic Analysis, May 4, 2007, rec'd July 10, 2007 13. Traffic Circulation and Shared Parking Analysis, received October 26, 2007 14. Wetland Permit Application, June 2006 and June 2007, rec'd July 10, 2007, Notice of Wetland Boundary Modification Request, rec'd July 23, 2007 and revised wetland boundary approval, received October 30, 2007 15. Revised Preliminary Site Plan, Truck Circulation diagrams, and Turning Movements, received via e -mail November 19, 2007. • Excerpts from the Zoning Ordinance regarding the Conditional Use Permits for this project. SECTION 7. BUSINESS DISTRICTS Subd. 3. GB, General Business District H. Conditional Uses. Subject to applicable provisions of the Ordinance, the following are conditional uses in the GB District: These uses require a conditional use permit based upon the criteria and procedures outlined in Section 2, Subd. 2. of this Ordinance. 3. Commercial car washes (drive- through, mechanical and self- service) provided that: a. The site is serviced by municipal sanitary sewer. b. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or areas as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence. c. Magazining or stacking space is constructed to accommodate that number of vehicles which can be washed during a maximum thirty (30) minute period and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. d. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than five (5) feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. e. Parking or car magazine storage space shall be screened from view of abutting residential districts in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. f. The entire area other than occupied by the building or plantings shall be surfaced with material which will control dust and drainage which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. g. The entire area shall have a drainage system which is subject to the approval of the City. h. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source is not visible from the public right -of -way or from an abutting residence and shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of this Ordinance. i. Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. j. Provisions are made to control and reduce noise 7. Motor fuel stations provided that: a. Motor Fuel Facilities. Motor fuel facilities shall be installed in accordance with State and City standards. Additionally, adequate space shall be provided to access fuel pumps and allow maneuverability around the pumps. Underground fuel storage tanks are to be positioned to allow adequate access by motor fuel transports and unloading operations which do not conflict with circulation, access and other activities on the site. Fuel pumps shall be installed on pump islands. b. Architectural Standards. 1) As a part of the conditional use permit application, a color illustration of all building elevations shall be submitted. • • Zoning Ordinance Excerpts for CUPs page 2 2) The architectural appearance, scale, and functional plan of the building(s) and canopy shall be complementary and compatible with each other and the existing buildings in the neighborhood setting. 3) All sides of the principal and accessory structures are to have essentially the same or a coordinated harmonious finish treatment pursuant to Section 3, Subd. 4.B of this Ordinance. 4) Exterior wall treatments like brick, stone (natural or artificial), decorative concrete block and stucco shall be used. 5) Earth tone colors of exterior materials including the canopy columns shall be required. "Earth tone colors" shall be defined as any various soft colors like those found in nature in soil, vegetation, etc., such colors are limited to brown, black, gray, tan, beige, brick red, soft green, soft blue, or white. 6) Ten (10) percent of the building facade may contain contrasting colors. Contrasting colors shall be those colors not defined as earth tones. The canopy may have contrasting color bands or accent lines not to exceed an accumulative width of four (4) inches. The color bands shall not be illuminated. c. Canopy. A protective canopy structure may be located over the pump island(s), as an accessory structure. The canopy shall meet the following performance standards: 1) The edge of the canopy shall be thirty (30) feet or more from the front and /or side lot line, provided that adequate visibility both on -site and off -site is maintained. 2) The canopy shall not exceed eighteen (18) feet in height and must provide fourteen (14) feet of clearance to accommodate a semi - trailer truck passing underneath. 3) The canopy fascia shall not exceed three (3) feet in vertical height. 4) Canopy lighting shall consist of canister spotlights recessed into the canopy. No portion of the Tight source or fixture may extend below the ceiling of the canopy. Total canopy illumination may not exceed one hundred fifteen (115) foot candles below the canopy at ground level. 5) The architectural design, colors, and character of the canopy shall be consistent with the principal building on the site. 6) Signage may be allowed on a detached canopy in lieu of wall signage on the principal structure, provided that: a) The individual canopy sign does not exceed more than twenty (20) percent of the canopy facade facing a public right -of -way. 7) Canopy posts /sign posts shall not obstruct traffic or the safe operation of the gas pumps. d. Pump Islands. Pump islands shall comply with the following performance standards: 1) Pump islands shall be elevated six (6) inches above the traveled surface of the site. 2) All pump islands shall be set at least thirty (30) feet back from any property line. Additionally, the setback between the pump islands curb face must be at least twenty - four (24) feet. • • • Zoning Ordinance Excerpts for CUPs page 3 e. Dust Control and Drainage. The entire site other than taken up by a building, structure, or plantings shall be surfaced with asphalt, concrete, cobblestone, or paving brick. Plans for surfacing and drainage shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. Drainage from all fueling areas shall be directed to an oil /grit separator. Minimum design standards for the oil /grit separator shall include the following: 1) A minimum of four hundred (400) cubic feet of permanent pool storage capacity per acre of drainage area. 2) A minimum pool depth of four (4) feet. 3) A minimum oil containment capacity of eight hundred (800) gallons. 4) Minimum maintenance /inspection of two (2) times per year and /or after measurable spill events. A measurable spill shall be defined by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Any measurable spill event must be reported to the MPCA. f. Landscaping. g. 1) At least twenty -five (25) percent of the lot, parcel or tract of land used exclusively for the gas sales facility shall remain as a grass plot, including trees, shrubbery, plantings or fencing and shall be landscaped. Required minimum green area should be emphasized in the front and side yards abutting streets or residential property. 2) At the boundaries of the lot, the following landscape area shall be required: a) From side and rear property lines, an area of not less than ten (10) feet wide shall be landscaped in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. b) From all road rights -of -way, an area of not less than fifteen (15) feet wide shall be landscaped in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. c) Where lots abut residentially zoned property, a buffer yard of not less than twenty (20) feet wide shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. d) The property owner shall be responsible for maintenance of all landscaping, including within the boulevard. Exterior Lighting. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the public right -of -way and shall be in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of this Ordinance. A comprehensive lighting plan shall be submitted as part of the conditional use permit application, and shall be subject to the following performance standards: 1) Canopy Lighting. Canopy lighting shall only be permitted under the canopy structure, and shall consist of canister spotlights recessed into the canopy. No portion of the light source or fixture may extend below the ceiling of the canopy. Total canopy illumination below the canopy may not exceed one hundred fifteen (115) foot candles at ground level. 2) Perimeter Lighting. Lighting at the periphery of the site and building shall be directed downward, and individual lights shall not exceed fifteen (15) foot candles at ground level. • Zoning Ordinance Excerpts for CUPs page 4 3) Illumination. Maximum site illumination shall not exceed four - tenths (.4) foot candle at ground level when measured at any boundary line with an adjoining residential property or any public property. 4) Access. Vehicular access points shall create a minimum of conflict with through traffic movement and shall comply with Section 3, Subd. 5 of this Ordinance. h. Circulation and Loading. The site design must accommodate adequate turning radius and vertical clearance for a semi- trailer truck. Designated loading areas must be exclusive of off- street parking stalls and drive aisles. A site plan must be provided to illustrate adequate turning radius, using appropriate engineering templates. i. Parking. j. 1) Parking spaces shall be calculated solely based upon the use(s) and the square footage of the principal building(s). 2) Parking spaces shall be screened from abutting residential properties in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. Noise. Public address system shall not be audible at any property line. Play of music or advertisement from the public address system is prohibited. Noise control shall be required as regulated in Section 3, Subd. 4.J of this Ordinance. k. Outside Storage, Sales and Service. No outside storage or sales shall be allowed, except as follows: 1) Public phones may be located on site as long as they do not interrupt on -site traffic circulation, and are not located in a yard abutting residentially zoned property. 2) Propane sales of twenty (20) pound capacity tanks may be located outside provided the propane tanks are secured in a locker and meets all State Uniform Building and Fire Codes. Large, bulk sale propane tanks must meet all applicable building and fire code requirements. 3) A compressed air service area may be located on site as long as it does not interrupt on -site traffic circulation. 4) Accessory outdoor services, sales, or rental as regulated by Section 7, Subd. 3.G.6 of this Ordinance. I. Litter Control. The operation shall be responsible for litter control on the subject property, which is to occur on a daily basis. Trash receptacles shall be provided at a convenient location on site to facilitate litter control. m. Additional Stipulations. All conditions pertaining to a specific site are subject to change when the Council, upon investigation in relation to a formal request finds that the general welfare and public betterment can be served as well or better by modifying or expanding the conditions set forth herein. 12. Restaurants with accessory outdoor dining facilities provided that: a. The applicant submit a site plan and other pertinent information demonstrating the location and type of all tables, refuse receptacles, and wait stations. • • Zoning Ordinance Excerpts for CUPs page 5 b. Access to the dining area be provided only via the principal building if the dining area is full service restaurant, including table waiting service. c. The size of the dining area is restricted to thirty (30) percent of the total customer floor area within the principal structure. d. The dining area is screened from view from adjacent residential uses in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4.Q of this Ordinance. e. All lighting be hooded and directed away from adjacent residential uses in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 4.F of this Ordinance. f. The applicant demonstrates that pedestrian circulation is not disrupted as a result of the outdoor dining area by providing the following: 1) Outdoor dining area shall be segregated from through pedestrian circulation by means of temporary fencing, bollards, ropes, plantings, or other methods, and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 2) Minimum clear passage zone for pedestrians at the perimeter of the restaurant shall be at least five (5) feet without interference from parked motor vehicles, bollards, trees, tree gates, curbs, stairways, trash receptacles, street lights, parking meters, or the like. 3) Overstory canopy of trees, umbrellas or other structures extending into the pedestrian clear passage zone or pedestrian aisle shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7) feet above sidewalk. g. The dining area is surfaced with concrete, bituminous or decorative pavers or may consist of a deck with wood or other flooring material that provides a clean, attractive, and functional surface. h. A minimum width of thirty -six (36) inches shall be provided within aisles of the outdoor dining area. j. Storage of furniture shall not be permitted outdoors between November 1 and March 31. Outdoor furniture that is immovable or permanently fixed or attached to the sidewalk shall not be subject to the storage prohibition of this section. However, any immovable or permanently fixed or attached furniture must be approved as part of the administrative permit application. Additional off- street parking shall be required pursuant to the requirements set forth in Section 3, Subd. 5 of this Ordinance based on the additional seating area provided by the outdoor dining area. k. Refuse containers are provided for self - service outdoor dining areas. Such containers shall be placed in a manner which does not disrupt pedestrian circulation, and must be designed to prevent spillage and blowing litter. • • • Memo Environmental To: Paul Bengtson From: Marty Asleson Date: 11/29/07 Re: Environmental Board Recommendations of November 28, 2007 Environmental Board Recommendations for Main Street Village The following recommendations were made by the Environmental Board at the November 28th Environmental Board meeting: 1. All stormwater volume and flow designs must be evaluated for conformance to RCWD and AUAR standards. 2. Site access for surface water treatment areas must be shown on the map. 3. Slopes of wetland mitigation areas be changed to conform to the AUAR. 4. Recommend 1 -2 inch scrapping the wetland soils in the freeze /thaw situation to control reed canary grass. Also recommend the scraped soils in wetland fill areas be salvaged and stockpiled for use in the wetland mitigation area. 5. In general, there should be a narrative to the Boards and the City Council addressing all of the mitigation strategies presented in the AUAR that effect this development. 6. All infiltration areas and wetland mitigation areas should be seeded with the city native seed mix. The city transitional mix is shown on the plan and this is a good mix between cultural areas and wetland /pond areas. The BWSR U8 mix is shown on the wetland mitigation slopes. A better mix selection from the BWSR choices would be the WI mix. However, I would again recommend the city native pond seed mix for this area, supplemented with flowering native plugs every 10 feet. All biofiltration areas should also be supplemented with flowering plugs. Biofiltration areas planted • Page 1 • • • with the transitional seed mix should have a low- profile height associated with the forbes. All native seed mix areas should be planted by a contractor on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources list of contractors. The native areas should be maintained for a minimum of 3 years by the approved contractor and if possible burned at the end of 3 years. 7. More trees should be planted particularly in type C and D soils. The C type soils intersect biofiltration pond number 9 and wetland mitigation area 10 on the north side, east side, south side and south west corner. Salix `Golden Curls' is a marginally hardy plant and non - native. The AUAR recommends that water infiltration areas be augmented with large herbaceous woody plant materials such as Aspen and Cottonwoods. Therefore substituting more of these types of species and more abundantly in the type C soil areas is in accordance with the AUAR recommendations. Cottonwoods must be of the non - seeding types. Recommend one tree per 25' O.C. in these type C soil areas. 8. Side slope of the wetland mitigation area be no steeper than 6:1 horizontal to vertical. 9. Site access for maintenance reasons must be shown on the plan for stormwater treatment areas. 10. A letter be written to the City Engineering adding issues to the project Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 11. Keep parking stalls down to the minimum allowed by zoning code. Add pervious paving if additional parking stalls are necessary. 12. Lighting should not exceed the city minimum lighting allowed by city code. Canopy lights of the gas station must be flush mounted bulbs that present no glare issues and downward directed. Monuments should be kept to a minimum and minimize light spill. 13. Request planning staff review trash and recycling accessibility as they relate to truck movements. 14. No soils may be imported or exported to the site without city approval. Soils hauled in should not be substantially different from soils that were inputted into the stormwater model. Motion: Motion was made by Bor, seconded by Andrzejewski to approve the recommendations and forward to Planning & Zoning. • Page 2 • • • SITE LOCATION, AUAR BORDER, AND FUTURE ROADS (I-35E Corridor AUAR Figure 6-2: Scenario 1) Scenario 1 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 1-35E Corridor AUAR 0 2.0:0 1.000 0 w 1..aolommone.Attemane AUAR B000day thbon Remove 11-kojeq ww■ Ewohno MunictpOB..d. Fiona' Fileadentrilikorditro (Cohortos) Proposed Trod , ',County Boonday Low Density Res.:kraal 14 Wo (Hugo) RA. Neighborhood Park ' Low Med= Densty Reskionlial (Centswilei (Center of Servos AreW Low Denolly Urtrowered Redder** ME Wed Lim (Centarvlo & Hop) Low Denwly &wowed Residontai Corrorertablndustel (Cowboy:lbw Merfwm Denary Peowlentsal 'ISE EN Men Dorowbowent Hugo) 1.11 HO Dowdy Aesobnlor 17.7 Wetlands C000nerciW Proceh ME Industrial w. Fuoae Coy Roa Wag Ch.. - County Dromage Infrosinvore PutbolSoo•Puble TIC.; zwoo r-wo Nate - Sown BM Strewn 100 neer Figure 6-2 • • • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE, (detail) • • • ZONING MAP (detail) TKDA • ENGINtERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 444 Cedar Street Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: Main Street Village Copies To: Connie J. Taiilon, P.E Preliminary Plat Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Proj. No.: 13810.011 From: Matt Woodruff, P.E. Routing: Date: December 6, 2007 The following review is based on these submittals: 1. Main Street Village Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan, and Utility Plan, submitted by Pioneer Engineering, dated September 26, 2007. 2. Main Street Village Stormwater Management Plan submitted by Pioneer Engineering, dated September 25, 2007. • 3. Geotechnical Report submitted by Braun Intertec, dated April 7, 2006. 4. • Main Street Village Forecasted Internal Intersection Volumes and Truck Turning Templates received via e -mail on November 19, 2007. Preliminary Plan Comments: 1. The entire plat is serviced by one 8 inch watermain. A redundant connection to the City's existing water supply system must be provided. This could be established by extending a watermain to the west along Main Street and providing a looped connection to the plat; or extending a watermain to the south through the plat along the "future" access road and provide another connection to County Road 84. 2. Internal looping of the watermain system must also be provided. Currently, there is an approximately 1,200 -foot dead end watermain. 3. All of the water service connections to proposed buildings must have a 6 inch gate valve installed. 4. Due to the shallow storm sewer pipes, reinforced concrete pipe material should be considered in lieu of the proposed high density polyethylene pipes to achieve additional strength. 5. Containment for the car wash runoff must be shown on the plans. 6. In conjunction with the recommendations from the soil boring report, the parking lot typical sections must include a 2 -foot granular sub -base material. Draintile must also be provided within the parking lot areas to drain the granular sub -base. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Main Street Village Page 2 December 6, 2007 Preliminary Plat Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 7. In conjunction with the City's CUP requirements for a gas station, the following items must be met for the Kwik Trip oil -water separator: a. A minimum of 400 cubic feet of permanent dead pool storage capacity must be provided for each acre of drainage area. b. The minimum pool depth must be 4 feet. c. The minimum oil containment capacity must be 800 gallons. 8. The limits of ownership for the sanitary sewer and watermain utilities are being further reviewed by the City of Lino Lakes. 9. The attached drainage comments, dated November 19, 2007 must be addressed. Traffic Analysis Comments: 1. An intersection capacity analysis must be performed for the year 2030 at the Slip Ramp/Main Entrance intersection. 2 • The traffic volume shown entering the site via the slip ramp is the same (189) for Phase 1, Phase 2, and 2030 and the traffic volume shown entering the site via the southern entrance is the same (154) for Phase 2 and 2030. Please verify if these volumes are correct and, if they are correct, explain why the volumes for these various periods are the same. • TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 444 Cedar Street. Suite 150D Saint Paul, MN 55101 -214D (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0093 Fax www.tkda.com To: Matthew Woodruff, P.E. Reference: Main Street Village Copies To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Proj. No.: 13810.011 From: Connie J. Taillon, P.E. Routing: Date: November 19, 2007 The following drainage review is based on these submittals: 1. Main Street Village Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan, and Utility Plan, submitted by Pioneer Engineering, dated September 26, 2007. 2. Main Street Village Stormwater Management Plan submitted by Pioneer Engineering, dated September 25, 2007. New comments are in bold and identify items that need to be addressed. IllThe following are significant issues that must be addressed prior to Preliminary Plat approval: 1. The Geotechnical Report does not indicate the seasonal high ground water elevations for the site, which is identified as the mottled soils or highest anticipated ground table. Provide documentation indicating the highest anticipated groundwater elevation. The lowest floor elevations are required to be 4 feet above the seasonal high groundwater elevation. Clarify if the first floor elevations labeled on the Plans are also the lowest floor elevations. • 11/19/07 This item has been addressed. The following are minor plan, calculations, and drafting corrections that must be addressed prior to final approval: 1. The pond outlet pipes are required to be a minimum of 15 inches in diameter. 11/19/07 This item has been addressed. 2. Indicate the overland overflow elevations for all infiltration basins, ponds, and low points in the parking areas on the Grading Plan. Low openings are required to be 1 foot above the overflow elevations. 11/19/07 Label the overflow location and elevation of biofiltration basin I7 and the wetland mitigation area on the Grading Plan. 3. Many of the infiltration basins have multiple overflows (storm sewer inlets) as shown on the Plans; however, the infiltration basins are modeled as having only one primary outlet. For example, infiltration basin IA5 appears to have two overflows (catch basins), yet the infiltration basin is modeled as having only 1 primary outlet (1.50'x1' horizontal orifice /grate). Please clarify. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity • • Main Street Village Page 2 November 19, 2007 Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 11/19/07 This item has been addressed. 4. Indicate the high water level for all infiltration basins on the Grading Plan. 11/19/07 Label the high water elevation of the existing south wetland and wetland mitigation area on the plan. In addition, revise the high water elevation for biofiltration basin 8 and the south wetland to be consistent with the peak elevations in the proposed conditions modeL 5. To provide a well aerated, highly porous surface, it is recommended that the soils of the infiltration basin floor be loosened to a depth of at least 12 inches prior to planting. 6. Provide a cross - section detail of the infiltration areas on the Plan that includes type and depth of engineered soil. 11/19/07 This item has been addressed. 7. Show the location of all inlet protection, along with a detail of the inlet protection, on the Erosion Control Plan. In addition to the locations shown on the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, inlet protection should be placed in existing catch basins located near the construction entrance to the site. 11/19/07 Include a detail of the inlet protection on the plan. 8. It is recommended that the stormwater pond bench area be seeded with native vegetation to enhance soil stabilization, nutrient uptake, and wildlife habitat within the pond. 11/19/07 This item has been addressed. 9. Submit storm sewer calculations for review when available. 10. Submit a copy of the NPDES permit for the City's records when available. 11. Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is required. Submit a copy of the RCWD approved permit when available. 12. Clarify why the total existing area defined in the model is approximately 4 acres less than the total existing area defined in the model dated May 3, 2007. Revise the current existing conditions model so that the total area is equal to the area in the model dated May 3, 2007. 11/19/07 This item has been addressed. 13. Existing rates may change due to modifications of the model based on comment 16 above. Rate control requirements will be reviewed when the revised model is submitted. 11/19/07 This item has been addressed. Additional Comments (11/19/07) 14. Label the low floor and low opening elevation of the existing bank building on the Grading Nan. • 15. Provide pretreatment of runoff prior to discharging into biofiltration basin 9. 16. It is recommended that trees native to wetlands of the region be planted in the wetland mitigation area. Main Street Village Page 3 November 19, 2007 Drainage Review City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota 17. Include a detail of the Enekamat overflow for biofiltration basin 9 on the plan. 18. It is highly recommended that the curb cut openings be a minimum of five feet. Past experience has shown that water flowing in the curb line may bypass a curb cut opening that is less than five feet. 19. Include a note on the plan stating that the sod filter strip at each curb cut needs to be lower than the back of the curb cut. • • • • PI$NEERengi eerrng f; MAIN STREET VILLAGE LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA L -1 CSAH 14 MAIIh STREET 1 r' j// —. L. 1 OUTLOT B rr O& OUTLOT D 1 LTP GRAPHIC SCALE DI PEP LOCATION MAP SHEET INDEX 1. COVER SHEET 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS & RESOURCE INVENTORY 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 & 5. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 6 & 7. PRELIMINARY UDIlTYPLAN 8 -10. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 11. DETAILS 12. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 13. PRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE DETAILS 14 & 15. PRELR7BNARYBIOFTLTRATIONDETAILS 16. PRELIMINARY LIGHT/NG PLAN SAMInterpor Secs Coon Rapids Office (653111 -1914 Fc651MS Ent. Ar�F.F. <..-I F 1a 1161)>F�1M F00101 -1® F�uW. e- 0,mayser.=twitsI a.0 obtle A�cNdle.�m 4%te Imp Dm SSW bac Ototeed ms Q.s COVER SHEET AZURE PROPERTIES PA. BOX IMP ST. PAUL SBNNPS6TA 55117 MAIN STREET VILLAGE L1NO LAKE, MIATEPSOPA 1 16 • • • • • • • nd GRAPHIC SCALE 0 50 100 ma 113 Par) 1 min 100 0L at h O ., ,. P 0.1 5S Moore A SWNe �rV.�4•: C.T:. ,c: R-G-w. Rio- • v. • South sew err t SD' i ride 010hunty Ma 14 T__ .pmt'` `` G +_ N.fh two 5x1/2 t71T/4 'iT•a�12"Vtf�'•'- -. Sec, 24. T31N, xzzw '`�5'�\ •`"J STREE. t D5 W -:r- 6AlE Wdrd J. Bo* i•w0 1r Av. / NgF23"ft \ ousel .gin `lie Swxa si. 14 twinge ;RI* AM ""Y die. 14 f • j • / � J r / 1 ' / tr e ad, fir s' •F, - "c :� ✓ rev]. etst ...r t4 g 0- m il. C -vnesz S w:.s. ` 250 �7,sars6t53'W A A Mt, L_/'it V!/ Ides aSok I ore▪ w I lITh f / i _4aa r ,a i t _ i ter_ \' - , " / ( �. wee' f .. / / i \ / / . — k',. '- i ...- .1„ / ./ / , ,Rr‘ '-- ''/ / ..,/ $ Hee.5ss3rst., ,7 f7� r, ,....A"- ,r/ ,.%/ nr fry. _° --t•^! "' fir, °t,A'`''._--,^: . ' r — • -'" . - t• 3. . - - 3 50 3. . t / /2 / r N89a422YE 20.73 _J Omer er ' 24. ' w (test I wnw,t) )- PI eNEERengmeenng !,"' / /// ,l 'r' ' /; J .ri,;' •1 Or r *�� 6 *4. ' • / Jl� urr.m z ,/ tai 1 g l` 5wM i/a 0 _ vt 1�` 2t, rnN, m22w grew: wen wwxanwN -�" 58r95'54'W 2.422 Poona Ovioc MOSSm Coon Rerrids Office ��s 'vise ssiv 1051yll•1914 Tar e112Jl111 06337111100 0o2fl -1® RlseiymWrae�tpe w m P�K ..der awew.Ik. aw tto. may +._... mseYe n'd Lad San, mar aiwe T ®Lhae.`wxsa wearYesaaFY®m• 0,6u. 20:93 Sot WSW 1,0,44W-2440424 • aeE1t Peet KMM. P E 7-WTOOttuy Comas nab 0.0030 carol 1113 Loan Cr X00 ', 5'64'0 11 seat Clly of lmv gas VIM EXISTING CONDITIONS & RESOURCE INVENTORY LEDAL. CIESIDRIPTIC3N Tract A, REGIS1FRm LAND SURVEY ND. 240, Moro County, Minnesota (Torrens) AND Description Per Doc. No. 1375258 (Abstract) That port of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24. Township 31, Range 22 described as follows: Beginning at the pan) of intersection of the South the of County State Aid Highway 14 and the Easterly right- of-woy fine of Interstate Na 35E thence East along sold South the of County State Aid Highway No. 14, a distance of 200 feet; thence at a right angle South 250 feet thence at a right ongie Nast 298.22 feat to the easterly right of wry f of Interstate Highway Na 5..S, thence Northerty along said Easterly right -of -way line 275.62 feet to the paint Of beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. SITE DATA Overall Are.= ±1 234,066 Square Feet a +28 13 Acres Total Upland - *1,058,555 Swore Feet .r ±2431 Acres Total Wetland = ±175.511 Square Feet or ±4.02 A-mes 1. Existing conditions. topography & boundary Information famished by Midwest Land Surveyors & Cid! Engineers, Inc 2. No tide commitment was furnished for this property, subject to oil easements of record. H one. 3. She is vacant land. 4. Only VISIBLE improvements are shown hereon. 5. Bearings are based an Anoka County Project Coordinate System, NAD83 (1996 Adjustment). 6. The underground utllties shown have been located from flea survey information one crating drawings. The surveyor make no guarantee *hot the underground utilities shown comprise o0 such utilities in the area sitter in scree or abandoned, although he saes certify that they ore located as .conatey as passible from information 00.iabte. 7. Gopher State was not contacted fa this survey. 8. Wetlands delineated by Njolhoug Enrrtmmento: Services. Co UlIGHIND xpwos Denotes Catch Basin Denotes Concrete Surface Ownofes 2 Foot Contour Inter ml --r•-- Denotes 10 Foot Contour o+teva ,, Denotes Oectric Manse lus p Denotes 500,1.c Box or Tionstamer • Denotes 1 Hyarant Dew Denotes Gas Metes •e• Denotes Guerra Pmt O Denotes Light Pole Mir Denotes Power Pole e Denotes Sanitary Sewer Manna. - sT- Denotes Sanitary Sewer - Denotes Sign O Denotes Slam Sewer Manna. -c- Denotes Storm Sewer 1 -'o Denotes Telephone Bar w- Denotes Waterman, se Denotes Mater valve -°'- Denotes Overhead Electric - m- Denotes Under•round Gas -�- Denotes Underground Telephone -,a- Denotes Fber Optics Cable - e- Denolv03 Controlled Access ® Denotes Well (#7 Denotes Anoka County Monument • Denotes ban monument frond O Denotes 7/2 kWh by 74 inch iron monument set and maned with license number 20595 Denotes Def:mated Wetland - Denotes Flared End Section fw - Denotes Underground Electric Chefs) Denotes Underground Gas Lne(0) —a, -- Denotes Underground Telephone Line(s) —>>-- Denotes Existing Storm Sewer - ---. -- Denotes Existing Sanitary Sewer 1 -- Denotes Existing Water Mon AZURE PROPERTIES P.O. BOX 17010 5T. PAUL MINNESOTA 33111 MAIN STREET VILLAGE LINO LASES, MINNESOTA I 2 OF 16 [ • • { • • • 131 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 50 100 i• a M IN ( )2t FRT ) 1 tm•3 = ISO R PIZNEERneeng H Rmrortl 1 Schreier L sw,h ire or County Mote L. a® r_AM laerreer non w er /�nY k• - 20 A f tt $ 7 R E E :/ `ern 1 were 4. 7 sal /4 491/4 586?3'I3'W -Sec Y4. T31K R72v N07 ,6,gpI. r 200.00 -- _ J .. 543.14 SEE22.05a 's�`y� ,.._1,----, s'. 'ae.> 1 j } 135,175 aR . . l.li — — - ArMGC Da R5'2' R-0'-R RAT A.^., a1wtR -- - - - - -- t€ 2-- as pct f((2 =l >'•" �J Mti _ O P (nslwNSa110e4 R) eP �,� �1 vt 'fi r `�Liw 7 5 t .In m. SuM cx M 43• < .•�• �_�` - Ceanll state N4 100NeeY I1c >+ � ti 1- 1 .N r^ ON 0 9 „ ^d� Sl4•.S541r m 263843 r 0 �. i that 1/4 Cane' of --Seer_ 24, 1315. R721M (Cwt ew' wh'o'op) 11 -WETLAND 470,725 suit) �vrEjl yry r t v L_ .51 OUTLOT B 4577.35 aR lUMon4- 3588452 a ft) -r-L) A A's A I e1 %' y,P. s 4255.531 il OUTLOT A ±26,056 .rot 5- -.. — 250.00' soc56'S3 -w r- 1 A 7,11-,':, 1 Cc f ( F- .. old croset C? smm r I I f- o8 - o Z Tr) A a,T f, 1/'n_, f �i I -• 255000 I OUT 00 LOT D ; 3ttn67 aR i• (tHtmd- 1579sb op. R) � Qv. ra ° tseffie 0P Clly of new Lww e- O N 300.00 SB0'55.54'W w 15. 22 .a 50 1 50 South 1/4 Lemur of -Sac 24, 'MIN, 0225 (4310 iron monument) :MN NC ao N8E55'54-2 OMER Paul K MI r T WANES: Saylor Cap. fJ 0 0t SITE DATA TOTAL BOUNDARY AREA TOTAL RIGHT —OF —WAY AREA NUMBER OF LOTS SMALLEST LOT LARGEST LOT 28.33 AC. 0.10 AC. 8 35,175 SQ.FT. 677,301 SQ.FT. EXISTING ZONING GENERAL BUSINESS PROPOSED ZONING GENERAL BUSINESS PUBLIC UTILITIES AVAILABLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Trott A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 240, A410111 County Minnesota (Torten') AND Description Per Doc. Na. 137525B (Abstr t) That port of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Ouartr of Section 24, Township 31, Ronge 22 descry as follows- Beginning at the point of intersection of the South fne of County State Aid Highway 14 and the Easterly right -of -way line of Interstate No. 35E: then. Ens( along said South line of County State Aid Highway No. 14. distance of 200 feet thence at a right angle South 250 feet: thence at a right angle West 29E22 feet to the easterly right of way line of interstate Highway No. 354,' thence Northerly thong said Eosterfy nail -of -way line 275.02 feet to the point of beginning, oeearding to the United States Government Sunny thereof. � Samsun Duet M11}sF7. 1 0.15'II 1051051-104 0 40141108 Coco Rapids Offias mC *o4.*i4tCl10 o:tlwmdnmreewrufm:mtloal 1�seLdadc tr61Ym -1.5 -loo ®•�y,nye��a�n' m^n 731 asASrn owe doe Sam of Mme Sy.1c sortsof.0.1, Creosols Sem. 25 PRELIMINARY PLAT AZURE PROPERT] S P.D. 100X17170 SC. PAt1L MINNESOTA 55117 MAIN STREET VILLAGE UNMAKES, M10..45056 I 3 I 16 • • • • • V • 4 i i AR Zit ........ 55- ; IIB ..111h. • e • PRORISED RAF • '''T-- >-----...4......*...‘.- ... ---1. -.:>. 1 IAs: le- 1) ^CS. OTTER LAKE ROAD Zi I is; ! f I ORP AT CARS DASIM SEE ElE2AL s O _ YS PROMO MTRACK L DRIVE THRU 40' MISC. SERRA LIE pmaama grai RMPp82, 2 4567 • McDONALD'S -43mmisemseas,--- -■•70, TYPICAL SIIIPIND 1BES RVAL BE 4" IMO NM 24' 55' i 55' 3 25' ISLE zr 2.5* 11 ' 1 1 4it cAnal S'IMS11 ::.;jt"- NWNEW: RIOS MY N1S-9) L. raw lime Al IDS POINT SSE SIPA II: I RETAIL 8500 SF PEE—, RASP PARMIC SICN (RP.) MCP SEE SEIRJ. ®® 3 3f. 4-- TRASH SUR1101.111TANLE CUPS (45 LP) NO ROO TERM SIGN (223-1) • — /AMIE Sun (141-1) o RCP CURS A CAR RAM =NM OE RAT (RI-2R) NO DO POI sol (R5-1-r SITE DATA TOTAL STTE AREA — 10.08 AC. (EXCLUDING OUTLOTS 6 & 0 AND R.O.W.) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA — 6.06 AC (60.1% OF TOTAL) PARKING SUMMARY FOR McDONALDS/RETAIL 69 PARKING STALLS 4 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 73 TOTAL STALLS PIZNEER rnse.-4444444 L/12e11Aserwrou .14:424.41.44carocn 1422.414.41244 441444.4:53121:1 145116414914 4444814436 ISEE SHEET 51 if-VATCPII US PONT CLIO CURB TYPES DENOTES 5612 TIP OUT CURB & GUTTER DENOTES E1612 CURB & GLITTER CSEE SITE PLAN FOR SURMOUNTABLE CURB AREAS) NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB. Coon Rapids Office 4414 44:444R.W. Cam 74,414. IsIMIS(33 2NurtyrISO Fa4743-114E 4444,...1}Also tab 184,44444a44 Ira 1.4.-4,144144,444441441:41 4.4440..4.4441 Pawed Sopree. stmt. Ism of 44344er — Name IMAss owe 2.<SFR na,E3flflflVI 440414 REVERLINE. • • • ".0 SRP RON (111-1) EXISTING BUILDING RELCCAIE RIMING DRAEIVAY OUTI.DT D PARKING LOT PAVEMENT SECTION CU55 4 GUTTER 14.4oes 1.771441, 2.4.44 IMP CUM AI LON POINT ISTAA EM, STREET CORTIECTION ROME Id XFSS 55 MOM 1 DROP CURB SS ORE ammo= NEAR CRAM NME45055 BITURRIOUS TACK WM — 2' 'TYPE BROOM= BASE MEM lert4,4550394 r CRASS 5 MAREGAM EASE PRELIMINARY Krt. PLAN OUTLOT DROP CURB AT CATCH BASIN AZURE PROPERTIES P.Q. BOX 1711.10 ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55117 MAIN STREET VTI I AGE LINO LAKES ANNIF_SOTA oF 16 • • I\ 3:0 V 371 00 7 • • • F. • f I -` (R -9 MAT 10N-r+ (R5 l) U DO t5 MAY ` t 1 ois l NT AT LOP weir SIX DEVI_ 1 hi r EE SHEET 4 (10- -1 ) star R11 a1 RAT DO ROT BIM 10N WWI AT COW CATCH WSW SEE DETAIL NO LEFT 11.15Et SW (83-21 & MCP SMA (m-q 0114° ORS AT 10W PONT SE DEWY. DROP CURB AT LOW PDMT 4i DEQL PUP Olin AT CATCH Blgl SEE DETAIL OVERHEAD CANOPY 0. 0 0 0 0 0T GAS PUMPS CROP OM AT CA101 RAOI SM OCTAL 1,,,=ro=000rrtr$, r ,TY....1- SCUM% LRE. SHALL RE 4'WM WOE BS SOEET CW051s1Ci FOR PHASE 1 DROP 15-9 AT LOW PONT SE DETAIL DROP O AT CA101 RS RA311 DErIN. SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA - 10.06 AC. (OCCLUDES OUTLOTS B & D AND RO.W.) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA - 6.06 AC (60.1% OF TOTAL) PIZNEER T ng PAWNOR 11711 (TIP.) PELL RAPP CAR WASH 2805 x" 0 Tb 11 60 GRAPHIC SCALE 3N FEET CURB TYPES DENOTES 6812 TIP OUT CURB & GUTTER DENOTES 6612 CURB & GUTTER NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB. KWIK TRIP 5285 SF PARKING SUMMARY FOR KWIK TRIP 13 PARKING STALLS 2 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 15 TOTAL STALLS PARKING SUMMARY FOR RETAIL BUILDING 125 PARKING STALLS 4 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 129 TOTAL STALLS PARKING LOT PAVEMENT SECTION POMO 1RL(TP4 1 PAMING 2 SRDI (TIP.) RETAIL 18.200 SF DROP CURB EER 00Aldi asarrsevszcas . .OTT Re9Di292. OUTLOT B DROP CURB AT CATCH BASIN I1L Coon Rapids Office 160311.93 5.06519151 133l712,510 rc701.102 Th.ofommlYdefmW raw ab a.da /Lmdlwd®IT or0 .edaWelua Ntlr_Areel AR®a RNr_510 19W 11s S9AT' Was NNOr bees. DAs a.- PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AZURE PROPERTIES P.D. BOX 17SID SE. PAUL MINNES(TLA 13117 MAIN STREET VILLAGE L000 LARES, 5II9043512TA 5 i 16 • • • • • • • 4 - - -- - --,... P..,..... i E i lt • / 1 / i , i P t i 0 15 30 CO GRAPHIC =OE IN FEES COUNTY ROAD 84 MAIN STREET rTh --T,---12-5-0T'TER LAKE ROAD • 1. 10- / DRIVE THRU ••• `.. Iret.,f Ir PVC CAEN= - -601010.11-1035- - -,--,.+F.- - ‘',A0- \ '''■„\ . : ,, C. ' -, -,-,,, ■ 1g. . '' Al-4' tr -- -,.., ','1 .-.......„ . r PC CLL010k A4. '';' ''I'l• a; 00 ' aret. ‘a.a4gt rgeb. ii iy i::. ..,, asson a-laTai i • .: can r evd:**:4 .. _ L-r-ar . \<2....... N rp : WI. , fr. • Wa- a ', ..•,/e-CECISNWNEFICC NOB AT BOLDING 2 McDDNALD'S FF 921.5 E • RETAL FF 921.5 AT ERALOON ..! • 1 •••••:;'‘NO /1-E CLEAN! 6 P1106 11-401 E STEED 3. RE 606 1 lwi, 1: ::ELH:1 11110,an.;77 .aal° lc ,1 1 \ •'E 1. tr- i ; ;OFT 7 RELD iii 7Fit_ 1 1- i ,:_t -t 1:4 '. 7 't coNnsa0m5 MALL morztoosumw : SANITARY 15015 15 1551PY MONO • • WE LOCA1106 -"" Tag PVC CLEAN= OWEN 11-1973 RE 161.30 E 0106 PI eNEERengineering • NW= 14P-lr-r CPE 110662 E 013.5 7' NWRArra.r- r 36-11,10P CL 152/ ONIVELIA 91120 ' CB 107 -- WE NEN E 014.130 r p, CEP NO -PARE 017.30 E 1015.1.-696 E 012.115-1 2-15-r CPE ORNIME E 015.5 Tr-vs- P 0 0.503 OL NANA RE 117J10 E 1712LES 1 --i•-... - i „___,... wo i OE Or7,110 r--.4....--„,, • . '1E Eica-is x'or 04 E 011111.4 . ■ CA57.544755 kS IE 11E40 ,,, E 1003.93-1110091 E1105.20 503131 .f,' ..,.. LE016 wmaaima 10 PRONE \ 1r ANL SEP65:500 a ma .... I '• i : ...... '••••_:-,. :-' , i i ' COSI= 11) E1000 sae - 1 P i WIN r war !mot Plc a4k▪ a MEND I2-6 6 0 0.56 . , tor-r 36-55 • 'LON ).■■■■,). CW 10 NIX !!1111 102 ,NE 01790 ii ti Cie k „ fi """ IS-r psc 510-35 • OMEN 10 ENE r EL E 057.01 VENT 01 650.715 3,F • axe anat et • 4, EVIZN-IrE RE 017.10 II. inz2o-trx EINA5 E 111L112-24.5 ,)1h ORAMILE 9 EX- E OMNI E 415.70 OUTLOT D 1: WETLAND 42'-12` 610 a_5 0 MOOR 2176-r PVC 9E-35 00415 A ,14 NN-tor 5507. 0-1707 -NM/0E gozo-s E 90L17-P 907 Yr WE= 9115 1551191 1SEE SHEET 7 1 2. OW ANDCLUNTYEIRSIMOS I. CITY F.Evalcrts. reSCL5 e E 915.70 r .,P 1-Arw , , t r PAM FES E NSA RE WM E 00026-5001 111135-249 9106-21-11 sia-star DIA) .(■1111 it-rm 60176 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTOR o 04 0 0 0 • • • E3110.00 OUTLOT A SEE SHEETIO FOR WETLAND CULVERT HYENA/015) GATE VALvEtS) REDUCERS) EGOSIING WATERMAN PROPOSED WATERmArN SANITARY MANHOLE(S) EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY 107105 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE FLARED END BEEHIVE METING 515101 SEWER PROPOSED srom SEWER GENERAL NOTES PRIOR To comsnwancw, THE COMPACTER SMALL FELD NET ALL 15S1118 many L5CA1106 PAP MERE, MON OR 16 MON. ANY PELIEEPANCY 1E11E91 PLANS AND FIELD LOCATIONS *NI. BE SEAMED ID SE PRO.EL7 EWEN MARDIAIELT. CO41RACEN 6 10 CCArTACT 'GONER NOM ONE CALL. FOP NUTT L10A1406 (517-451-0:03) 411 NUM PREP TO 00AVATON/0*NSTW1540N ALL 51/11TNT SPREE 10,10194111 ADE SIM WIER CC0151131CTEN SHALL CONFINE 10 NE CT' OF MID Loam 5PHoneANONS. BUILDING R5511.1RORNIS AND TIE '910116110 CA11016 1191*1.100404000051! LINE NSTALLANENS AND SANITARY AM 533010 MIER 06171L41154 2000 ENROL AS PREPARED UT PE MT DINEEN ASSCOA1100 INNIESCITA. r SWUM' SEIM PIPE MALL IE 00 30. k r SWINK MINCE PPE SHALL EIE SCH. MUSS ONERNE NOTEll ME MT 15 LIND LAKES 5T45670 PLA1= 1104 613110NAL SANITARY MIER PMENATCAL ELL NATEIIIIM SNAIL 6 NIP.) 7001141 005 PPE. CLASS 57 MEM 011531106 1071E1 A loam or Le COVER IS PENNED ON /EL 611901401. MESS 011000016 WIN A NINE OF le NERTML SEPPPATIM AFC 10 0101023NTAL SEP00A101 45 0000 1104 424. °TRIM SEE MT OF 4140 LAMS STAINARD PIXIES PM ANNONAL 04130161 DFORMAIIM. AL. SEM WIER WEL FE MAL ANL POLTENMENE PIPE UML-M OTHERINEE NOTED. SE MT 10 LINO LA05 STAMEN FLAMM 030411014_ 5100 SEND INFORMATION. CON1RACICP SMALL WART ALL INOLINE MINCE LOCAMONS 10114 NIVER. doostilr"' Coon Rapids Office MI C. Avow XIV. Gm .0....1M715.M 710.1110 h=70410 mcor mtle-wyamemmereke.:441 ma .0...sed Aelemiaragiser 19337 Dele 173147 eritr .1.1 bilsvem .iapes110 r•ar 513.477 Lbasse 0.4.6 S.4C PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN AZURE PROPER= PA./0051Mo Sr. PAUL_ MINNESOTA 5.5117 NriArK STREET WTI AGE ENO LAKES. mmHg:1'ra 6 oF 16 • • • I v ' --7 • • • • 99 r PI *NEER ';.ne >e�[ AImm.9114 AC13.1L ( (651Na1-L9N 3.50 LE 1 14 E 1 94100 Oa SHEET 61 1 is-r csE VIE nem srrao ORA94111E E 91E00 i[ E liHSNN' TJS-1r /,. E 193.4 E 912!0 -t C {26-0 Orel 1 13. E 9190 • o-wc _ 0916 - D.- 919.70 8 106 l / ESIAM 4 f ki ti -1r is Laos FZS 199449 :. 1 1 70 113 RE 9165 E 914.70 76 2 16 C +PE i`- '-- DR/MOM 7T -t3. PE 1)d S PARR RE 917•0 E 91323 I6.. • 050S 70191 104 TE 977.20 E 91216 E ". e GAS 1.° A.�+"4) slr PE • LL609 1 E 912.5 AT 91440}00 KIRK TRIP FF 920.5 CEI94 16 RE 916.9 E 113.77 mum 112 E 91E40 4r-2r M 102 -' E 917.00 i f i E 902.16 -1tE .:: E 91229 -1071 E 1100 -213. 2_42-.41 CPE� EE 03 • CUM tt• 901 RS E 715.70 .i.I • S 9. -A +lr PE 0 1E00 COW m PE 915.20 E 9125 -9$ • O 1r ,_._ OP . all Ff.. 999 RE 91960 :'- -'E 90120 -r wi E 90640 -6' 613.1 t 991177 A 717{ Pr SW.40 • 2DON 9111042 9/ - y rwcSa 27-6* OP EL WETLAND r OUTLOT C E 90100 AT 9997.46 T OP Q32 RATER SOME 4 4 4 11 -134r 04.) 0!792. R -174 E1197.20-S E 90172 -1 SET 1P 01109E PREP SEDDON IT RIP FS la E 9119 1E 9165D E 906.65 -301 E 91133 -2411 E 916910 -21491 Cliff 114 RE 916.1* E 112.34 -1r11 E 912.167010711- - Y1 110 05.506-33 E 191.03 - 100069 E 911.46 -2CE • 2 RETAIL FF 9200 TEE E912-7 i 4 4--. OUTLOT 8 Tiff' C t Ohm T� W0. EL ■9193 I 8 19 I TEE E sm2a l i /%j Es.....4p�tl • r 9P d 52 IN tr rt so.9eF ' °" i ��z �Rma�n 1 1 e I t I -n 779 PC 9x aAtYj rw r• RE OP 117 1(179 2 -IS PEA ^ a1NP t9 PLUS E 915.193 • 0977-- "'---- 3., 91t9 --. i ✓t Coon Rapids O61¢ mEA.N.wAr1n 0e) 7011996410103 leaver 9015001 .5. rpAmib Wray AVm mprtims tl0A1 0ALbars. PeAme beaver uAeYeimetie6Anef N ®4 1938 C 2. QIT Arm costa 99TNRF9 t. CITY ee9✓ffiK 100 0010 040 NIP 10 91231 irFES s/ TRAS( MORD PLACE 3 CT RP RAP, 0-2 • WIN FRIER RENO BLOMI0 h 111 LAST 3 JOINTS PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 0 TS DO GRAPHIC SCALE 111 FEIS LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION IR VC P71 34 D P O • • D ► ! • HYDRANTS) GATE VALVE(S) REDu R(s) 1175"114400 WATERMAN PROPOSE WATERMAIN SANITARY MANHOLE(S) EXISTING SANITARY SEVER PROPOSED SANITARY' SEWER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE FLARED END 93MVE EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER STORM SEWER SCHEDULE CB or MH NO. SiRUCT. SIZE NEENAH CA571NG or EQUAL MH 101 60- DIA. R- 1642 -B MH 102 48' DIA. R- 1642 -B CBMH 103 48' DIA. R- 3250 -A CBMH 104- 48" DIA_ R- 3250 -A CBMH 105 48" DIA R- 3250 -A CB 106 2T DIA. R- 3250 -A CB 107 27' DIA R- 3250 -A CBMH 108 48" DIA R- 3250 -A C8 109 2T DTP. R- 3250 -A MH 110 or DIA. R- 1642 -B CBMH 111 48' DIA. R- 3250 -A CBMH 112 48" DIA_ R- 3250 -A C8 113 27' DIA_ _ R- 325D -A CBMH 114 48' DIA. R- 3250 -1 C8 115 2T DIA. R- 3250 -A MH 116 48" DIA. R- 1642 -8 C8 117 2T DIA. R- 3250 -B CB 118 2T DIA. 9- 3250 -A GENERAL NOTES 1, AIR TO C9151R1'1 11. RE =TRACTOR 9410. FEED VERY, All ELSTNC MITT 009+91911 01 1 10 2 91 90 1 9 0 70 AND ANT OISSTEPNL1. SERMON PLANS APO FELD IDCAL095 4111_ E IEPONIFD W PE PROJECT DIME. YIECZA1ELT. 2 COPORACla1 6 TD CONTACT 17 I4* STATE OE CALL' Fat MART 0910177440 OM -CU-400Z 40 HOOPS Pant TO E6AYA71a1/OOIGT1AKTaL 3 PAL SANTART SEVER. /0700110 A1O Slav met 9G9YCIq* SHALL OVIFORM TO 1FE COT Oe 14440LAKES 9'ECIFCATTNS 9101011• REVIREFOPTS Mb 141.02010440 SPEOBG71Q6 FOR 902901077 AND SERBCE LINE RISTALU.MRS ND SANTARY AND "TORY $1177 INSTALLATION- 2000 FLRIat AS PREPARED VT TEE OTT 019911!3. 4S000T Y OF IR6ESOTA. r SANMMY SEVER RTE 91440 E S 36. ! r swum swim PIPE 949!4. E SON. 40, N @.ES 01177771E NOTED. SE QTY OF 1040 LN@5 STNDNO RUES Fat 00200100 SWEAR? SE0 98OIYATg0 IL ALL WAIERYA91 51411.E 10±104 4199E RCN PVT_ CAS 52 UNLESS 3170044'0 NOTED. A MOWN CP 0C COFER IS 11'00779 IN Al 9ATERNARE MUM 0774091 SE NODaa. A MORN OF TV 1ER1043. SEPNIATEN A1D ID 119770774. SEPARAT92N S IEONISED Fat ALL MUTES SRS OT CF 0910 LNOS STANDARD PLATES PO2 009599401 9ATDIMW 991094091 E All 57990 SUER 514!1 E DUAL 9440 PO.3EINEDE POE. 144065 001Dt1 NOTED. SEE OTT CP 1940 LAKES 57N0N0 PLATES 40 ATIa7IONAL 5190 SERER 0150504A11051. 7. WNHtAC10I 94441 TE]6FT ALL 91970•00 WWI= 00947101 9(471 O91ER AZURE PROPERi 1± S PA. BOX 17030 ST. PALL, MINNPSUTA 35111 MAIN STREET VILLAGE LTND LAKES. MINATSOTA • 7 I 16 j • • • • • • ---,.... ..:„ -....-... ": r- ---- a-, - -........_- COUNTY ROAD 84 r • E3I0FILTRATION BASIN 2 r. AREA=2,760 S.F. • W (SEE NOTE) W HIAL=915.3 OUT=918.0 0 BTM=917.5 1 , V) I. DEPTH 4 STILLING BASIN:' I s YET. LAND FILL •■•.t AREA.--3,209 S.F. - 01 EltikkE-ROADt ' , BIOFILTRATION BASIN 3 ..r..1 i AREA=3.719 S.F. ■ .: (SEE NOTE) ' l....." ..,' IL. P-......,110HuTV&:99111.50 ....." L IIITM.-.917.0 ,--" l. •-i -••-•,---..el ....:; • 916.2 BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 AREA.-.3,499 S.F. (SEE NOTE) HINL=91&5 OUT=916.0 Blik=917.5 INCIDENTAL WETLAND FILL BY COUNTY ROAD PROJECT 41, . , _,. 4.-,•. CURB \ , TILL ING BASIN TsDEP-TH S: --, •-',-_, ej!..' 44 li 1 1 J.1 I ,-..; ;it MA I i I = • ; .., -.. '4=1 4 ; ... - 40401 0'1 '..N.. t's. ; 1,--- i 1 i k j i C't mi........ / i `fif. 1 •Pi A k- 1.L I i N 'ti \ WETLAND BUFFER AREA=23,540 S.F. ASEED BUFFER WITH •;BWSR-UB SEED MIX) BIOFILTRATION BASIN 4 AREA=2,616 S.F. (SEE NOTE) HWL.--916.7 OUT=916.2 40 'BIM 915.7 GRAVEL cousiRucnoN- 4"‹ ENTRANCE • \ D snw .••• cu cu .• • /E .0.F. 2.2 ip‘ E.0J.• 917.2 m WETLAND MONUMENTATION (TYP.) -,W0015 FIBER BLANKET `•• • 53:1 • • •,.• • iv L'• SCRAI CANA (SEED sEErt. 12 PE F.E INV.-908.5 • • • tiL 6.7 174 107 10 CURB IC t7.9 IN9L-MA110N BASIN NO-r- S- I. AVOID NEW ECIUMTLEM 'RAMC Di 64281 AMA. 2_ VINEX FEASIBLE =MAX BASIN OM 11220410 MR= PERIMETEP BASIN TO A PEPIN CF 1517- MOB 4111141 DRAM 2. TEM*: TOPSOIL MOM WSW 4964. F NEEDED FILL Br BELOW MEIN ORME MTN 4NCOMFAC1ED STE DUVET SAND OR SAND. 4. 4440240. 401 FENCE MOUND EBORLTIMSICTI BASX 5_ INETALLATION OF BEDDING vAismA_ SAND. MIX 411. NM FE STARTED UNE_ AFTER A. SCE INPTIOVENTEMS APE CEUFLE1100. E. SIM UNOSCAPE PLAN FOR 011An3 0.115 P29641 11120141401). PIZNEERengineering bacruns M}08mLUNflIX (64011.1914 isc681268 Coon Rapids Office 111.0 1' DEPTH ,>> STILUNG BASIN 2. 15" e BIOFILTRATION BASIN 7 AREA•e308 SF. e., (SEE NOTE) 0 •--14WL•=917.4 _OUT=917.3 • 7 CURB CUT DEPTH STILLING BASIN 10 167 LEGEND CONTOURS CURB CUTS '7 11 • • • • et* • • • * • E.O.F. • 917.5 • • 174 CATCN BAS/N STERN 20 111E12 90.7 FENCE RETAINING 5420- BOUP4DARY LINE 64 .54014.444 PROPOSED 04/ 4.4nuN.IT. Lem 1,14..141001 (11SO 0141110 FM11341111 I imtlemenily1.4144/F. MIM/M4/./ me or onl4r, enua 110,4411711/1411211 P. ay. laws die-Swear Nam • 19314 cia#6Afeg? 454.4980 R. CFTC 141401 BEMS.. T. CITY MuISTI.F0 1211 84 TREE ▪ SCHEDULE Na SIZE (0,1.) TREE TYPE NOTES/STATUS 1 28 COTTON SAVE 2 22 VALLOW &kW 3 28 0017061 SAVE 4 28 PALLOR SAVE 5 16 WILLOW SAVE 6 16 INL1.011 SAVE 7 18 80108 SAVE 8 8 8020L0001 SAVE 9 8 BOXELDER REAIDVE 10 8 BOXaDER REMOW 11 10 BOA:WU REMOVE 12 10 80000008 REMOVE 13 8 BOXE_DER REMOVE 14 8 91081 008 REMOVE 15 8 BOXELDER REMOVE 16 8 BOXELDER REMOVE 17 8 BOXELDER REMOVE 18 12 VALLE* REMOVE 1.4.444 7/IUM 1 1440192 BIOFILTRATION BASIN 5, AREA=6,596 S.F. NOTE) No. SIZE ou) TREE TYPE NOTES/STATUS 19 16 WILLOW REAIDW 20 16 VAILOW SAVE 21 15 MILDW SAVE 22 20 WILLOW SAVE 23 24 COTTON SAVE 24 22 COTTON SAVE 25 26 C011ON SAVE 26 12 WALLOW SAW 27 24 COTTON SAVE 28 14 COTTON I SAVE 28 20 COTTON I SAVE 30 14 COTTON SAVE 31 24 COTTON SAW 32 10 WILDS SAVE 33 12 COTTON SAVE 34 22 COTTON I SAVE • • WOOD FIBER BLANKET 31 SLOPE • 0 IS 10 90 CRAP= SCALE IR FEET BENCHMARK BRASS DISK IN SE. CORNER OF BRIDGE ABUTMENT. ELEV =932.08 PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN AZURE PROPER_ILL-.S 13.802. 47034. 61. PAUL_ MINIVESCFTA 53447 MAIN STREET VILLAGE LINO LAKES MINNESOTA NO! • • • .._.,. •,..! . . : : r•jr›,.... -,...... --,- . -., -- -71 , _7.7— ---' i i• ---- -- ....„, "..34c......, r-- "'`,41'---:--915-- -7--- — ... 1T---- ----.. - - z i ,.... 7 i • • -•••, 2.1311, D'AMMRPV,510135. I CITY RV/MM. i is-'3:ji SLOPE 7-- ..s.BERIol •••• .„ i . i ,- , , ,.'-- ENEKAMAT , OVERFLOW 915.0 L- - s, <bi, ‘:- WELAN D A HY& gl 012 ' t0 \ \ s.1, P)- . EOF 012.50' , ...- ...-- ke4R4E10 • • • INCIDENTAL WETLAND FILL BY COUNTY ROAD PROJECT MATCH DRIVE ENTRANCE - CONSTRUCTED BY THE COUNTY WETLA MONU ATION (TYP.) z .c.14 r•Ni E-0 163 CURB CUTS / 912.2 7.E 1' DEPTH STILLJNG BASIN DEPTH STILUNG BASIN ALAN.* • • EOF. • • • • BIOFILTRATION BASIN 7 -4. • AREA=308 S.F. (SEE NOTE) ,HWL=917.4 _OUT=917.3 B1M=916.8 1C IBIOFILTRATION BASIN —IAREA=3.531 S.F. _I(SEE NOTE) 'HWL=916.7 IOUT=916.2 IB7M=915_7 BIOFILTRATION BASIN 5 • AREA=6,596 S.F. -.,,(SEE NOTE) • HWL=916.7 • 007=-916.2 • BTM=91 5.7 • • • 1' DEPTH STILUNC BASIN • • WETLAND FILL IIAREA=1,471 5.5 SOG, 3 FINISHED FLOOR=920.5 • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • s • PIZNEERengineering WETLAND FILL AREA=7,415 S.F. WETLAN,., - an, „. 7DARy WETLAND FILL 7:---- AREA=575 S.F. ‘\.., EXISTING WETLAND DEIJNEATE) BY OTHER5--"-A., 4,4 .- _WOOD FIBER BLANKET \ 111 • • 1 I • zz -- • — V 1 • . ' k IP" / 1.127 Emelpoo Des Coon Rapids Office (65111111.91.7 FutfilA=6 2011:50...mesT,IV Cam rupt=.1=t5103 OW) 711341[110 Fsc913.11B 916.0 Flmellysarcily 11rno ofw.nrs 11=1.8a,my ems en•ddy Lased PeialeadEgiaer owl.* Inn ie...laweer Minsons. D.D.= D.= SW' ..heva BERM 916.0 • a • BIOFILTRATION BASIN 8 AREA=1,639 S.F. -(SEE NOTE) HWL=917.3 OUT=916.7 BTM=916.2 BIOFILTRATION BASIN 9 AREA=5,935 S.F. (SEE NOTE) HVIL=915.3 OUT=915.0 BTM=914.5 === PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN AZURE PROPERTIES PA. BOX 1710B ST. PAUL MINNBSOTA 55117 Mare 1,01.1et 70 laMerr 717E L. 13.1. IL 14•1237 atioc Coomors CR 05 1=0.113 CMEMEHR. SUS FB6CE 31.1.1110. Ti.1*st, 1:1110Te..10 601 ROCK amara.cnat ENTRNCE 51301..03 605 BENCHMARK BRASS DISK N SE. CORNER OF BRIDGE ABUTMENT. nEV.=932-0B —sanant--11111M 17 16 so no GRAPRC SCALE IF FEE71 MAN STREET WI .1 AGE LP:MAKES, ArPOCTTA 9 OF 16 • • • • • • BIOFILTRATION BASIN 4 AREA =2.618 S.F. (SEE NOTE) HWL =919.7 OUT =916.2 BTU -915.7 WETLAND BUFFER AREA= 23,540 S.F. ;(SEED BUFFER WITH ;BWSR-U8 SEED MIX) '5 WETLAND MONUMENTATION (TYP.) *4.0 • • • • • • • O • • • • ‘`• \ 'GRAVEL CONTSTRUCT1ON -; - «- EN1RANCE LL- .W000 FIBER BLANKET „3:1 SLOPE, • • i• • • SOO SWALE 4053 TG 1E! CURB CUT T' DEPTH 1-STILLING BASIN ' �- r."'. ma .... V.MN911e FsiN416 SIB 915 914 912 910 905 905 x• •.••. * •E.O.F. • 917.5 RRADING/EROSION CONTROL NOTES: %3) TEE SEE CORNM11Oa AND/CP FIU.JC OCCUR 011E NNE 5115) �REPO-CF-MME. RE BACOT. IMIENI I SMALL EE LWPACim 7D MT OF TIE SETAE M051{RE 00177 MATTE OF SODS I ASIN 3- 808 -70) E[GPT TIE TOP TWEE IFFY Cr OF TIE BACK -:H_ TEN MALL E COMPACTED TO 1007 D0131Y. AN R> ODIT T7 PSTNG F50 SHALL ITT TIE SKEET SECTION IN FILL AREAS AND PROVOS THE RESET OF ITT TEST IC TIE CITY. OTTER AID TIE WRIT. 2 IT CONTRACTOR SMALL INSTALL 977 FEIN PRIOR TO COMMENCING OTALMO *0115115. ND SHALL WONT. SAID F7110E FOR RE TRAM, OF CDISIRU=Oi ACI11Ri6 1 TIE CONTRACT= SHALL LSAT 112S ACSMTES ID PE 5)1010* LAOIS 910E ON TIE CRATE PL.AA. ALL CON51RIEMEN AMI ES SHALL. COMPLY ME TIE LOCAL ORDINANCE- TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 911)1) FENT. AS PREMED BY THE EiDINEEK TD PROTECT TNT ROTS LIE CONTRACT= TALL SCHERAE IE OPERATIONS TO IMPURE- THE OSTa•T AMA AT ANY OVEN SNE E. ALL METED NON - STREET *PEAS 9403) E 161OED ER A MON EN CF 1,4- TOP ST_ SEED AND MULCk. TOSGN CONTROL EMPTY. OR STS =THIN 1)E FOLLOWING TIME FRAMES F NOT ACTP/TY WORKED: -9.OPT GREATER THAN 31 - MOM! 7 OAT -SLOPES FR= 101 TO E1 - MTHN 1.1 DAYS 3. ALL SET. 500. MULCH AT PENTII3R TAU. COMPOTE PATH RE FOLLOWING MN/150 SPECIFICATIONS AS worms same 5) TT ME 3070 PER lieSC NSiiORT) 30 METAL PLACi4B4T 2575 E ST SHALL E PLACED MOD CURB 011IEA041ELY FOLLOWING TIE BEETLE. IR®ER 0111*15T AND UILIY PROJECT. C RE SEED 441761E SHALL CGN951 OF A IE/00f TYPE 500 =LESS MOLT D3SM$IE ON RE PLAN_ 7. FOLLOWED SIN.," CGNSIRUCION, 1HE DE\F1..OPER SHALL CLEAN TT 81NYCU ON AN GNOME BASIS AS REWIRED 8Y 71E QTY. 1. 4£RTCAL 5)1001S TOLERANCE 9HAU E MTTN 0.2 FST OF 11E OTC •, APPROVED GRATING P1014 PROFS D TOT ETAT = A2 TOP 07 030 UNLESS NTT 01)5)95 1C ALL CAIOH BASINS SMALL E PROITIEt *7111 EMT OR E01AL CATCH 3691, NEWT INTRT£ SHALL ALSO E =STALLED IN RE =STING DAIOR SATE ON TIE 494100NCE ROAD. BIOFILTRATION BASIN 10 AREA =1,736 S.F. (SEE NOTE) HWL =913.5 OUT =913.0 BTM =9125 ErpopoD zz N111D0.Z oiPAw :row' VIP •G••‘•••...o•.•- • ••• ••• SECTION A —A W000 FIBER BLANKET 3:1 SLOPE WETLAND { REMAND MRIGAllOff BRIM O®IAAT9IC BOTTOM A PIeNEERengineeryng 50 Coon Rapids Office 10D 150 20D MIME A.e AN- . Corn LgTEA. WI919 CET m1IM1T 'ID.NC `Wm* oak. m Es Fln..atmml H e0ce7Me ® IDRa, PIEAN 8T Al. . 5anr IiNFA . esblle len AlAwNeM Mac AMy tic 19A5 One SHIN 250 CIIYd OWNER AEMMRS. 300 250 A Dc SDE 1.meet Wfi Rpm, 1. WETLAND FILL AREA =17.100 S.F. 12" PE F.E.S. PLACE 3.0 C.Y. RIP -RAP CL 3 INV. =907.6 PRELIMINARY GRADING EROSION CONTROL PLAN AZURE PROPER1I,_.S PA. BOX 1707* ST. PAUL_ MINNESOTA 15117 1 0 15 SO • HD GPAPH5 SCALE 07 FRET BENCHMARK BRASS DISK IN SE CORNER OF BRIDGE ABUTMENT. ELEV, =932.08 MAIN STREET VILLAGE LTD LAKES, AIMNPSOT'A 10 GF 16 • • • • GRANULAR. IIATEFNL REDDOFG EM TH OGAINGATIMO PIPE MAMMON DEWS L. SMARM lamOIL Oa 101 ELAN SEETIOei DUCTILE IRON PIPE REACRON RADOM "IR ,EIS Arm CROMEE1 SOMME addlma 205 GRINULAP. (LATER. ENG4-%14ENT CGNC0 TE GRADIE PIPE DEWING DECALS )/1610( 102 DIM LE OWN PPE REACTION BACIRIG (fax 6E10S? SeambIE Memo 206 sANTD1Rr SEWER SERVCE MOM. Mena 313 PI ZNEERengineering raermac (NR.N. IR L I Ra.511 Coon Rapids Office (6 5 11 6 11 411 4 Fu.66IOO (sr Fs won ammo FN. mamma gar mamma maw am mom • Ram me dm Roo ma. dommemi• dm mom/ me ma mow mama memace Pm war CAIQH BART. TYPE 402 ELOMM Mom. 402 Leo me OcaaarsoCE OM oat II ELM. EROS S. • mmr0 rawE SOUL =VIM m .an =OA. 'Oft I. GRANULAR MATERIAL ®ORI i METHOD (WR wr_ 0mC ide nnwlmb m•f. 103 SPECIAL iITUNCA ION FOR STABILIZING OR OERADEANG of 1REJIA^H VIVO( TROMLE mom. 105 9 DOME • ME MMELL MOM ME WOO 4l a OE IDLE EdEEd£o AMC Oneal■roVe (11771 SWIM MIER MANHOLE. TYPE 301 (Arm Tr OR L SMIRRia Mona 301 car Ma Moe • Mae ammo m Roos.= MOM MR ImaL aar.sr Metaald heat OM • CATCH BILSINAIRMIOIE, TYPE 406 406 um um, SAVORY SEWER OUTSIDE 000P MM. Lama 306 +...m zx OR MA, edema modem nova, Max ea MOM m .wm MARL SEC10 E_•VA,ro1 oa >r Rome sada ma do um ••■ moms Immo Rom ma awe ma dm me ammo. go Nom owls Rama ram me mama most RMR Om Or am sod. *maw de MEL meRzetas lam OR Noe mea ammo imam es OM dd arameme Ilona mad. M alma. idoe • ad ma dm mamas 570101 SEVER MANHOLE, TYPE 407 MKS ZT OR EMS) la 407 sap eaftionetir 331•3 T MOW 0.MM wore Ia-taE MIS at MOO MANED at lasoldaar 3N11. IS MOO at sand 1.1, l w m w c a R 01111711E RIMEL sa >A. We TYPICAL MAWS LAYOUT Zat (WYE IR RVEWI17) WOW omKED MICK MINOS WM.) Moo.p Marne 201 MAINLINE SANITARY SEVER C EAPIOL f 1fIRG1j Palm 51.1M9M Mama 303 M/m car Is. imams Ma • <P. IR IMMIMMIL meat Mra Owd. de em at. ram WM. mom rem mom edema liRemo om Dom ammo • {WPM, .cm Mai Mem .. rm r m um 0m mew =RN SEWER NINIr TYPE 406 10.14•61 0.s 406 GATE VALVE INSTALLATION LAY oat former MIN cr MITCRIHd" CLEANOUT IMrWLR€ SANITARY SEINER 00171311t nIRERB ANN. Rodeo. Noos. 310 Ats swam ...ex 411 Goo. i OOF Ml RIM ('1631,Ef -tan FstBifIOR lamOymtla mar, f.mv�v1* ml RAMM mRllNmm6mn I ra. M ddT LadMmmaILx•m sw mice. Yes KOeSeM Yb+e. Regtie 1911 am WOE Iteviesa ame 5007 Memo. CAS 4r DETAILS AZURE PROPERTIES P.O. BOX 17970 IT. PAUL MINNESOTA 75117 MAIN STREET VILLAGE CPR) LAKES, MBITPSQTA 11 or= 15 I Or • • • • w- =twat" ic BWSR INC — \\ ; ormacer, \ RJDING . • . • Bmix*SR_ sEE a oarrose.„........./ w5 / GRADING PLAN E/I 3 00011:00, BWSR I IR PIZNEERengineering 1172 Drama, Dore Coon RzpicIs Office *am iiesper-10,57711 M11061-1013 2011001,4•74.V Caalorda.lniastis (10)710-1100 Irrioronthadaoroarspoposli, Ise a mon ryarra aporrano4hOI ae•iletly Lammed LasaamaAnOmet mairothe Don aide Ws efifeemea. Mos amAil, rami. OtSateem lacc. lar MOE Das OW. PLAIN__ ..SCI-FOULt KEY COMMON NAME/SCIENTF1C NAME I QUANTITY I ROOT 'INSTRUCTORS Drd'2STORY TREES 1111" M, - .1P., 1.10.00E0RY/CMDS MariClootohc 37 i.r sae SORBURST HONET-OCLESVORREstr ttiocon1A0A tor. ilerrn0 '3-moole 13 .3' R.R3 0 • BICOLOR 04A/Garcus bicriv- 17 23' NE ,iiifiR-.; ,...- li: GV-r.,,,, Wits mi.ww/sui. 'coon, Cuts' fi RURA01-03 LOOM/TEO crocecano Tiodmond 15 2.5" 1389 ORNAMENTAL TREES ...... PRAIRERE CRAB/M roklfire: 5 1.5. BS :7,1 GLA1ONG ASPEN/P11/1.A. 4,A00,10,01. 33 .. ,,,,ti. 0011," 4700 0 AMUR CHOPERRY/Prom.-s monad; 13 :3- EISI EVERGREEN TREES 0 BLACK #1.5 SPRUCE/Fi=c giourt dencoto 5 r RI& ar NOM AIL LANOSEA. AREAS 7E- EE RRIGATM lionoms 1. 090600,00 c-1010 roriosal LICSAM4 001/ PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL MT 10 =LE 7., 07 127,, 0000 maronsom urns .., 0.7117:40.0 R.syrr 071P70 WV{ '.04% tit 7", 00t. 00113. WI. NC NIZSPL Or yerussollna. MIMIC RINN S&L.... MM.. Fa. le.L. 0110/4 NI MOW or lie arcr0 4107060 01.05. ft., 10 Karl. MU OM tararr NCi 1,441? raera.e. 010.1,0. SCL rammer ,,.• 3.00040, 000 pr.)04 iivic 110.1 000.011 MAY • .. res. Er.,...,,,.. asmossaray ir as / 4411.1,“ harax0; p0m1 et 1E Sta 10 M.N. r 000- OACTV rs.we rumor r:01-1,riere, r PAM NC moo. ors ../ i OrOot- so- toOrr 00ma a0.00.a. OM, as / 0. cr mar raela rratir 417a (:.. 710■L la. ' ,'WeiVe 110.00 1.710 31.0115 DE Mel. aM. WM, 10170,0011 sem Oa M. OMR CONIFER TREE PLANTING DETAIL MOT ID SCALE MY 07 OM 10. Mar MEMO COM= Om. COME 0/1 a Lao., 1,010 mann. RAI1W or Tworakeer• 501,ALT. ▪ 00090 RN? Ta0 FL. 0 el 10 IP SC r CAME OM DaMeraD Oa. ra. MANI IP MOM. KM ono Mrala Sat IMS. Pa .011, 1■00., 0.40040 ■0000 0.100.100 MI name fiao. Ws a Cr. TM 000. Oa Ma 70, .moroorso mgra0aCa Ora/M Moos aaa ateasai so ra, am. MGM lat , am.. ROM LoOM M MOO. arta.. Strscallia. Oat SC0a, WOW Dr ,coo spos oc, 6 % 14: A c• ....usa.. wammc , e't r legIROLSKY SAW... 1,00I e' ' ‘ ‘7.. ,........, ........ ,,,,, 47 00 £019.: 0000400 M.S. ,,,....0 .., / f....mitz.ri........., ,, .e.' ..-; -- \ , `,..... '4/ c....,-_,..._ ..... 0■0701 1:0_. 000,0, 20. 1"..- -...' . / 00. E.,-.F.r wrx MMus: %KW TO arr. MN. OM togs AZURE PROPERTIES P.C. Brox 17E30 St . PAUL MINNEKTEA 55117 ■01001E--C-.0 .00 00 100 GRAPH-3C SCALE IF FELT MAIN STREET VII J AGE LINOLAKES mursr_scrra 00901.041, 12 oF 16 • • 1 27 • • • ISLAND DETAIL A TYP. SCALE: 1 " =1C -O" ISLAND DETAIL B TYP. SC ALL 1 1t.' -C' PI ?NEEReng%neering Memema Meese :beta. WWI1B 16511651 -1911 5.6669.6 Cant Rapids office I LANDSCAPE NOTES 12- the Lc-a ®t Centre.. Ws. met Me evert na fa roam a tstore .9e rot se'a!i9 aNm.e wa m e6Emteem a *11 iM Lenmcme. Cmbn., Ms !c1(o me wmeeme Immel at mamma pafaii *9*2 me e, taint , ray: in oMonate lm _ :Cm 1 tcam,cs -1 an .. t-am. a me L. 1w 7 . .... cm -. c 5-M et em . a, r tit=sre *11 y6aa sor too eat. enema Metre e.iWS 1 anew amtav a ,.. es: tar a,* Lem. Maanr tb l=.sw� Aamr•.v�r my - rar�9ala or ntette veb :ola., - (:rent b be o5lmmee by Me m- - M5 emit moo. atm m trees ..9e ewe.,F a. aemeben ne beer, a re .. It the Mats am_ _ At Plan. WbterW WO mite, tin .- .eared fwae :. M Arse.. A.aebtm .t Aersef -MS•,w Rama. F. Wei, :root. - el .11.0 ref maf.rm a b. rte.. e.t vtlmvr a mn.vmn et M (6) aaetes. mw 1e MM.... Me ,uwmuouc Erin anmee bat ems ee! b. Mime. wit we MM.. CmPrLIm .rum cow-critic mmmmely to Or tie. an.46 of eU - Tin Fexme Can1n-ate Me: *ow.. net. Mm: motor..: toot,` oat (1) ...Me' lee boor. 1Y- erne al ...w. =031751? U .me 11een tin 0.rwr. wmml. CM.. ep..e win b* Pere mr./lbi5m etm 5m+emew - Me i21t .n 01511.4 teems Me tiq,! b rope 9,,y Mel. we 6..wn..ewLrnebx7 veer, me ^9 ter alter notailMem - Me amaaaeey .1 use areas of pmt- mew m me tee ember men en Mr Pine at. We mew Men m W. Man W. text meooc.om- -k MAIM. Mareitter M. be mantable roe b- 3 Mt6 1.mtNq aef mana.n le melt. wet Mtn en Me W.W. T. L96.* a Cmpst. Ym1 .rift 5 wmlllei sow mm me MIA ma, - Center.. geese may ken m Mae m Mad d were Mee - Mr La.•tema 0 Cene3119 Mw rape el e-wer . We W. emit. b, tee WMat'a) ...Man a1 m cwf to Me teem. Me eaaewa�m5. . et : cow P5,.,e er . d 9� p.6ef6m. am m59twa 65'35 .5 .inn '"pn+.a .. . M prem. , non* 1�. 59, ag0 . a demo. en „ tee.. am, be row... m, err * - 1ne ,65.111- men m eewmeHe .s Emmet, age .1 apd®ae wean, .veS*Pw. and poem gooReo.e 6.e ma - 6tmme. et mans.. renew er-a.e w5 et en name PLANTING INSTRUCTIONS to p.m. tam dean road. am •Qa, w1 anmmmaot mm rite .rem m e mime 9,W Yea' Semite 367, Mew I.pe.i, line B - . Memel e! 4' el 4p65 tc b. 91m n di pWt1.a ew Me 4. .: addle: m ete pew nwc ameneme. .r cwt'_ . mina moot, truest.name "Mew+ w... Wm* 1t. tiiapm. .1 , 7. wmnmues Men be 705 "®'m .inn .. t ._ _ - en- M. Wen . 'e M, en Sd .rmfve w.61 w. P.mpmei. 1sn5emt me m1tr. b. ey meat: 5 'eta fee menet 12' c* fei - Meame seem, PECS 01 mne-W m 1.. 9(575 :inner n Mmn*O rite Wiw otfwat F.oe b r,m6:ur 1v alrr eftaA. p=ity own.) mom 1n cc read deem e' V. fiery eez a met,, raw em ewes w__ee. emit e. bee. 1' r. 55.01*' m great*' ln.eeoymv tam -acre* - m - Ac ee Melee Mel s Pmnmiot. Pura, at .emi.vit mine e. ...re ac*oraw5 a M .1.1.51.551 *Menem - wen. Melt be N Ma., ...ant man. Me et w1. os Mete 1- A9 Len Mt. be arum. -0544 ma bit -550.6 set meet >. me*555 evmmeeafa A9awema aWeee M. be P.M ear entree ee Mae n M -Wm. Beene at Wm Wm eleow.e, am M.*4m only wow b let....o . smeete ea. aroma meet est Met_ mete* mem., - noun- M,ec Oita be emmee wets M neat el mere vow.., name, LonlISS O. awls.. Is mem. eemenp.6Lr steel e. .Nnam'e or my .*115.5 ottm meet •t often m .mate tee nat.. e+bm �95w.a CantriWit aw Meade necra.ry rrw0mn.ty 1c mm. ` *5i M*. W m.S.wv teat mm�bn e' M .m. a Wm. Mani waled mwa Pe rot 14 tee m pmmm9. o .smite M*65 , keen m. G .**'..wits el ma te dimes. mums. rentetM01 ealit 0.9,11 gem C 9. o mem p 166ue my .e 6.A. w Breve .mes a bee lue site mm ewe... ems. et fee .am seem 1, me ett. el meet .e a5m1 m PLANT SCHEDULE KEY 1 COMMON NAW/Seentifc none 1 ROOT OUANIIFY!IS1RUCMCNS SHRUBS BUFTALD ,0.3NIPER tdperuc sabinc SuHme' f3 =NT O.C. ORS LITTLE PRINCES SPIREA /Seery_. ,.ipmlCC 42 CC'. :T DPR DWARF PAVEMENT RQSE/Pogo Door' Pavement. K CONT. - _ v._. PP PURPLE ,AV:LMENT ROSE/Ra -.o '>=Yrie Peverllen. 52 CCNT - 3' Q,C- oe ROIL ALL LANDSCAR ARE0.33 TO EE Ip.RI0A17)7) .. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL ael CUES Wm tEW SET ▪ tern °'tea WSW., PLAINS YE 30.47.711. SAW, ST- W rieW VC ME MDT +POW AS CONIC .e bu Pt.Jac yr, . moo "stem. Nem me mem weft KM. Ow 1E rv-argED • DEOWLWra FT, 7.E 16137 FE SO NOT la SCAM MLitt .13 66.01.11. w...w•ni�t.' fJ+t 026 9Me maw▪ s m SELL. 3.3:030, � mx net m1.b.AenewM.x Ca.kWet19M6939 (165)1[411651.5+165 -ate keeMemityteeteleMmeameatelby mateermtleva WM, Mind Leman.. .tte.m we*6eVma Moor Mate .r 5 lame Lott LI.- t eiMe 15 Wrote Bx Ate GCE do 4/16/07 3*- Mew PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE DETAILS AZURE PROPERTIES P.Q. Hat 17E30 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA 55117 MAIN STREET VILLAGE LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA 13 ) 16 • • • • • BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 1 SCALE: 1"=20'—'0" BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 2 SCALE: 1=20-0" BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 6 SCALE: 1-=20'-0" PItNEERengineering 1272 Esesio Otis Alwits Flips.wt SCE 10116114941 i.3. Coon Rapids Office bat, a.> Ss IS• EIs. sussed* 115111Asse Is a, ladv spy mroite 1.0 veal Cask*. '00717,179 ss.sy Lisesd Lams sass ores s....rsonssn moo iaa 92.7 au& dui.- 0. Mobs BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 3 SCALE: 1"=20.-0" PLANT SCHEDULE KEY COMMON NA1C/Scodific name 1 ROOT 10UANITIY1INS1RUC1IONS SHRUBS 1RED C/SIEP DOGWOOD/Corn:et Aerie. 'Cordin 1 #1 c0k7.I 1 f GRAM OTT 'ET PRANBE MIXTURE E PLS. ars./AcRE INFILTRATOR AREAE - NOTE N./ LAIXIST.NAM AREAS TC ES. IRRIGATED • SHRUB TOTALS FOR BIOrTETRAIION DETAILS 1-IC AND ACTIGA11% AREA ONLY ••• ••••• SEED LABELS FOR ALL SEEDING SHALL PE FROMM: 77) cm — s=r, WX AEAZ SHOULD BE PLANTED BY A CJ1 AC O IRIE MINNESOTA DEPT_ OF KATMAI tIMLIRE UST Cr CONTRACMIR5 •••••• I Rs* 0.64.17, sass 4-INF• Esp. PM BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 4 SCALE: 1"=2.0'-0" to 7141/#7—.'r BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 5 SCALE: 1=-20.-0" TRANSITIONAL NATIVE SEED MIX F U TE IP 011REASED AglAILEUED CCRTAtON NAME CAL NA Ma POLTTELOLIA GRAMM ECIELERIA IMGRANTX4 IIMIERGEtERIKASS7 1■FASI AMER AMOCAREBUJE AFTER 110113•11.473MOSTAR convosAzaosNA 2 ELACIIREVED SUSAN PRASE EIRIEFIRAITET 610EDENALIELSIDEIRS ASELEPIle TI.EffROSA ORTEREFICOIDES OMER LAEVIS UNTITES AMES "IMRE se•CSIA ALIEBEEKLi NAM RIMALIESCASISSISETSTS FIFA AFF-A eOCegffEe TOTAL 100.0 RATE: 15.13 PLF laSse .I07. NEI.* /MAIM r1,047.615.10111.11131mEarl.11EBRED, MAXIMS PRELIMINARY BIOFILTRATION DETAILS AZURE PROPERTIES PE. Box 17E30 E7'. PAUL AREMPSUTA .7.51r n. ix MAMIE -MB IR* : PARR. SS* Osadi I Sins Fiss, -FloRTsred oees,voa , IIN lem *war hartluntbs PA* ssess ASoessus , nsc!s*■spmr!ses SP • kiissownSie SrS■SSSIEESSNS Lassa Gob* TISRESsMISFIR F FOTFTTEP Srkstoss swede ISsereRIE • _CLaSsAnsACS•as RS SS Cos ETA Esamsemos Mos-smael RSA Lr 17TP.* CsaS WM Rs. PLE. Sslosssurs. IsIoaCeS17). II , Sons Rams tostSso Ms. isURESSES.SENIEFS A FIRMS 79.73 Ts. isollio NS MAIN STREET VILLAGE LINO LAFS.. MINNESOTA ETEMELS.as I14 (1, 16 • • • • • • BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 7 SCALE PIZNEERengineering BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 8 SCALE; = 20' -0" BIOFILTRATION DETAIL NT TL• =JLT SCAMP' E7S37C SOIL AVOW 6:N_ m1PACH6N BEDDING MEDIUM H0MO09GWS MIXTURE OF 50 -505 COHSTRI.'^I3DN SA30 (AAS3RL. 0--0 OF: 33333 C -33 14714 GRAN 0Z OF 0.03' - 0.00 20-YJS 70PSa. (SAWN L'6W1. LOAMY SAND, OR 10443 TEXTURE PEP USDA TEXTURAL 1710.73E MTH UM T3( SR CLAY 40073303 AND 29 -303 0R0 LEAF COMPOST (337,301 GRAM 2). 3' U.- SHRCDW HAIS%O033 357,03 (430301 TYPE 4) FOR AREAS PENNE9 AND CLEAN 60304 sm.: ASPS* (43300•3 117_ 3 AT A. HATE 03 2 TONS PzR 4CR-_j 303 AREAS SEEDUL BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 10 SCALE: 1".=-20'- O, EARLY MAINTENANCE AND EVALUATION OF NATIVE GRASSFORB PLANTINGS YEAR 1 EBTABISWAENT (SPWHG 11 11 44704 347 -1.11733111114134 AINNTEPIANLE: 413•3. 1) ad In w Wnar1®) • 4aY 16.33[96[ H 33 MN, 033,3314311110770643 34 311113130131473101. • Y0W30AW1416FPMNS4L4444x003# SPOT 9314131131114 ETC. ESTABS41ENT (FALL SZEDIPG ) 11137U6 FIE 414E 3113147 -111117337712413131 a 0481ATEcent.4n10P1EEg1P 330433 303 (FW.ONNB SE3B 13 13 1•3411-1311114133, 43316.41331167 13 31 MY. 0749®11 030434 343133131317111101- 1,134.111442311231133 w4,uW3302 DOH, 1407 333137111341134 EVALUATION )4iN@IGnOP®10aN0 W1MR1, MHO 30431701 @PT00wl44Rxpn® E8Z01117461AC®1t 40GB 473100341 RAW w 340303•36 1118701.41333171441183 M 43413311 1, IV 2143413 ea Rana CS 03341.13431013147317431,1011113317371111, YEAR 2 MANT43tANC- t 1033. 1407761 • ASE I- wM1a11T IIOH • 477441117311 1 10711W34 31 T1921 3H31DI131,S 3333 3439 W 7,1134Q 9,13 7SRES m. 3 113E arts WAY xm 4en1F33N3GHNnaH3411E 9 BEAM re. EVALUATOR 7) 1133123144111311.1. ¢ 13173511111119 341113613141.4 W7s L ®041141 343111746 OW® 17TenIG3W13189Sf14N .Mr0001.70WL645141 WOW 3I0a0 43434. 7®RHNG.9nO0.473701 43 6310E 61W41OP30wNROJVOUAL ETC.10W ME YEAR 3 MASnauusE: HuARPA F114ES.lm 143330 43/11114 6PR47H6033. 313• a 3RF33A4ML7 W 147174.1443441/4Nr6∎104.n.Tenn /BM EVA/DAT R/ 11 R1N430a0401131ma1707013417.437,3- Tut 01441414 01231310 e7e. LONGTERM MA9RENANGE 11 Hu1. war .9,>9.11741wvoc.3337«L1 3331910417110, -147 WHAT Hann. 5711 1044111114.113111111144111.41351.131711 01343141141.1. USE wren4316Eff 41111113413 COMPANIES THAT MIX MNDOT AND BWSR SEED FADES DICOTH3 STN NATNE SEEDS Imam - 3•3371. 314.3117411011 tn. 73413747437 1 03143- 744316 BIOFILTRATION DETAIL 9 SCALE: 1" =20: -C.. SEEDING METHOD ESTABLISHMENT OF TEMPORARY COVER CROP SITE PREPARATION THE NEW SITE 31101114113 737431133, 313117141TA3111147713411303743311470113119 1 7013•3614 DEPTH 639314 FERTILIZER , R 11 16312. THE R4441046303112 E 3 34113934.334re OF 611771 4361333 C01I1114E FE1114II611PPCHa34 Awreff 33040331147.N33641334110 Ar 1404143 7HES® 1316,43437. THEF0, 0036,340 I. 1n A3M.T66,AID 6410311206,334E 3110300 MON AS WELL 4A34TM06TUN T8N34301461TM4x 8Y400Ep144RAN33034 S® INSTALLATION TEMPORARY COVER MOPS OF CATE WN191 WHEAL 143E7L0R113S0440460'0€ 1804E MT BE 367,440044365 430313300 LfA07444.263. 33LW170 13E17I2 SHOULD BE 1•370 12 MK SEE33Y3 RATES THE 11411341377 COVERPOP OF DATSOPV4M3614144 WALD. 33341343 4 11131E 0303.6!404-_ F 1391417311 111130 AS4COV6i410P.RBHR40 BE 36034314 MUTE I313DI854431E HARPA3 03 THEME 3014014 041333340 07 14141 1 401.1400733 13157,33111331 41413141313334113 •334334030•3. PAGKN33 PA706003 391400004144 W61413-10 11E1141311114111Y0011311P MUIfl4 739131104D4Ia1.4eN6 L£•JVLTOP®IaLOA00P43OY6UMI64H01 111E4060111117114 1360311143146364114.113141E3E43L11103 0t@ 4341,13077376 311111113.31M31133 WEED MEE 1WL111A10041E OF 20TQ0704303 .73430 143711111.41 03607 TYPE 731 HAT 934333`01340 00 . ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NATIE MIXTURE STTE PREPERATITN POR INTERSE=DINE 1011.1Y4 6 Nli=64317 FOR 96U11.AT0N 041141/47133 EED 4411183. 11393E WRY430)3110RTH3F114*73034 34CO3611439300. 1ALMID33631AC7NELY 410/300/33,7713131119.7 HAY MEOW. 71114 311714411701 4434411101111437/1010 W 004704 07 .100141 3134K09NS0919G14214171414B0034 *E 73,331701. 0P3WV_NE0113 FOR 03461116 VERE 111707 OE 7313r3 04053E 3114335. 1001X64 ME P3i4M7016NEZFL3NR. SITE PREPARATION UO3i7 7TLLAM THEN496®ECWTTH47910RWYCONA 43419.1411311131411431)4113117713111 001WCTa 9avFO13AEFA3ff TIE 14d 33I3,*0RH11'COV6130PNT0 THE SOL 3AFAfE 4PP4I3W347313 SALOP TRE3060as..1441.6E46EP 7,1006,1 THE 4444N LP PLOW D®n. MWG 0144 33114311 0713.1903D1E1S70 RACE MR IR 4/1221/1733 FERTILIZER FERT4 ®3 SNOT 3 T RANN DE MAIR4W0113B SEEDm.4Yd3E O WAS 14.447-3131111111114E 731,11705131411121734103137. SEED INSTALLATION RY INTERSEEDING �3MTELYMETO 311E4YPF W10f4R333IWNNe4 PA1L1E®4l346 4YL1 MOM 70034.7060€701.#0)T734037773. 14334140433 0141431441713113131 1811® MES 4 PIE BEM 03(ANOA TTFVILIR138R1FFT8®5AI06 BROAD E E3NP ®%EIH 3360 FURROW 0PNIER6N6 PAPER 3700.4 0 4014401 THEffiIL ONFGILY 07E11 THE Mil 13016 MAMMA 701T8PAO1I MOLD Ea 7,014 114 NTHR9®ER ORAL NET BE DUTA7EOVNHTR46N WPPRBVMC11N4L40E 71833821160191314100M01 ATD44313E• RA70130U1TEYOB41906OG 43931141•11111.11111311141/3117 7/2011011 DEEP 1444 3111113117/46/11111£ 7763110 34E 311214EE4111 6,0 40 3076. 3111019170 06434OROR6EED3S 031010E4100I06UW044R10MT34 PIE SEMIS. 0173RO641/737 006 71/12 BERM= 00x7849 MAL 0.14746 if 11103 poo 17P62Au. Oa1S�1G 9040E 001E 411 A PAHt .x01. TO /31374431 138441;. SEED INSTALLATION BY DRILLING LIGHTLY TRIED SITES �X7S 3HOIH.00:96441 ®31711 116®34-1X4 w414✓ael11747 NE1B10X4174601 ®MBE PUNTED 4N 30 *.o 31£06133134317 M1® 14A8011400UN460344T,PE3. THE 13131_611031.11114417.11 /ANNMIr 4_303043;4FINE 6E43 BM AM A BOX 101131 7FUPFY 170 MINT 610412E 79(IPPEOW32(a3.P7AROW 0704.M61HP40A�.Y0Cb13.77 7SOL 3484.117011f41134 33314 ROW, 310441311101111193311414111133111334 10W6MC9051148.8 @49049,PINE MEI 94004E OR0> ®EO0430 AE 360 MX, bap ROAM E PIKED 73404,3473431 HAMM DERV 041•3 411314113141311413 8 0 40 E COE 411314143 N4I.0 S1ASALT 6,04•31363 SEEDING RATES RAMS APE 8111331111712 Of T3/MIL. 7411311117114111311124 11413,4134T31. HARROWING Nesnom e610111&EISN1. MN. 941374 111E POW 4963E PA(7DNG 744.119 80163 W ∎344334 TO Et61114 43144613313 70 . MLICil M03N34YIOT43E3439M4416THL1TOx6TP 6,1441 £ 11313.831933.33 =UM 67n1Cd4R03. 73E 433113103113[. 1034411-171111411334371 11OVi0460OFA8N4E 00,13174 F 7103031003 3403036,167931401SN3 7 209,1111.5.34/3 211467137077: Hap. UN MID (651311.1914 3411449486 ID135W 3.4.00.14 R443h�f13mm3P1u7a3.o7HM 000n Rapids Ofllcc 1a�6piG[ x149G3f 44.77107 ®e ymUmmd (241) 2171-11031 440164 -1611 MialLeYn 4Mbe Sse3M�1 home A.aiL 1.13. A ADO 1 It 9064 x 1.700 3431111/ .3..x17 PRELIMINARY BIOFILTRATION DETAILS AZURE PROPERTIES P.O. Box 77630 ST- PAUL MINA CCTA 15117 MAIN STREET VILLAGE L170 LA33933. MINNESOTA • • • • i—E-230--APT—G—T—E/SXX TAPERED SQUARE / SPUN CONCRETE POLE BY STRESSCRETE C.'. S. A. H. NO, 14 T R E _ br • I. Ir • 4! • • . Pa • • , la • I...V.44. • • • ;• ta • I, ib la • • • I. I. • t,r 1., • 2, • • • S. .1. • • ".• '• . .. • • , , , • Is • • • • • la • • • • • • • • i• • • • • :7• „ . 'It • 1 N.act...11.4 I. • b i• ...t. • : w • • • . • • tc?'11, .. aa........: I 4. b v. ........ •,',..' . ...i.t.._,, ' • a. s: • •..„,1. • SA. • . . I, I. ••,, ,.. • • •-•,... t.. !......• A....,1• t 6 • ..:".-...-5: . .s..... ....:.-,. .t.T.,. . . .'..--T.: .; - ,11 • .', .', ... .. ,.. ,..:' .:- 1,..71,...i... ..:,.... - -T.- i. ...i . ...,. , 4 • Y., lei Y. y ...,11.. Z.). t 'It—% ■• :. In Y. : 14...1... ...it : . ..,.. ...ft mil 1 ,I.I.,-1, • to b. 1... • • I, I. %,..,:i. I.• 1, j•I..t.::;:.1.. .1..... „;.44.4..4.......t. .,‘.,... ) .......... . ■■ fyr.:Y • , s. la • ' I. 1., • ....1.. S. si f . . .4 • `4 in 'V .1. '1•0•,,I“ 4 SiLY- 1..? lb . .1,' • rIIIIMUCIII126. • t ...'„.t, 4 b:r. • .,......,,,....:.: .:L...•.;.....?,.,....i_r„,.'• I.....i,...;57....,,,,. ;...1..;,:_,.z........17... -.------'-' -..'-'-'' . ' . .........'... ' ttg.: ,; , r. • ;;—.--- — •.. - .* -':-.''''',::-"',"' -t. fr-1. • %.,...•,..• 1,, 1, I. • t.,, '4,- V', c‘........,• .......,4,......1:,.: ..2.,3.02:: .......InfF.r. it.1 r---L -- --,' —7.7* il i.. . . . .... ... • i...,,..,1. •...e, 1.. , - • ' I i • ..; ' ... : :.cli .,. .,....-p-,:-7,..1.,..,, ...",:„.,,,,t. ... y MN. ny. • • ty . ( . ' ....... N.'... --- ...',1,.;:f.......— ' . ''.......y...y. ts • 4 Y.At • Ai Y t• • —.1.- • 4 "'t • • • tir• -I. • 1,.. • • 1S. — " • • vet:aifei: e.,„ l' -- • • ;•1.,•: • • • • L. Ib• ; • • t • j to t", • , •••t • • • t •• • • • ..--?...• • it.' 1:1,7t.'7,t' rzl- .7t..,-1. F%;:...; ::::: ..1 • . , . . .. u : t • • I. • u . i . : - ....., ... .. .. •*■,.... •71,k.,,,,,, .. , • • sfi. ......... :..• - ' (.4 I v. ::: •,. • C.r: ,.. .. ::, !. ' ! ',," "' •1 `. .7 , ,` ,' ":" ": "t‘ ..,":•:•••:. I : `• 7 ,'"' '.. ,...1 . ,. • ..- .., 4'. fl._ E..: -:- ;I il - • --,,,,, - • • • " •:-..--•...;:,y,,..=.#!"..... - .7`1.... • '2: ..• 1.: • ....I. • •il ti 1 • . ,.::-;- iii .. ...,:..t- 13 .1 I i sg i • ... • • .... • , ......... tit .....‘,.. . • I. • • C. • '..• .1, t..4, Is is t• ; i 1 ri4 if t: • • •.• • • •-•'• • • • • • • - - • ' . . ▪ s • • • • • • • . • • • • -" • - • _...... . • GRADE KING LUMINAIRE - K210 MIDLAND MARINA LUMINAIRE & RIVERGRASS ARM PItNEERengineering Lighting Plan Provided by: JTH Lighting Alliance 6885 146th St West Apple Valley, MN 55124 41., • • • • .. • . ... • • . " • ".2.' • "' abibgar • Nyvyrn.... I:Awn 14.1 . Im•tettat MAU 1Mb I 067b pt.. ein• 13331e !tin tr-tott-v....,,, pat at's !te-toott,str-no, tr,ect. .0+ 1.10,,, yawn, •••el 4.44yee Wet 44.4 woe Inn 4.494.4.4 /1•41.n ratleneut Lett itrtowsece !ft al. ILI Old ItBIL. bag irtalmn 0.6 !bowsaw, EC kW ULU 11.14.1Z mon 111•••••49e 2.7 lew !Tr. ;; .‘• • 11‘..-„:„,y ▪ 4. I. • • • : „„:„„wo,'„,c0•3:„„ 21:010.64.5.1.1019:11.46.c Ur lamp:a Dot W.I. hap. D4,5011 MI1661-1914 itedIMIS Coon Rapids Office Ibellb,297.111'.1•S plae.nirs1.•11, 51 1St AntoCN.W. or trot., MI. mt. Ext Mai Ctrelees..1.115139 4S L* AS) 717-... as* 71 4.7 *me benne= 1. 1.19121.U.I.,Cebbb5 u Dm= PRELIMINARY LIGHTING PLAN AZURE PROPERTIES P.O. Bo: 17530 511. PAUL LUNNF-SUTA. 55117 1 MAIN STREET VILLAGE LINO LA1MS. MINNES711. 16 CIF 16 1 • • • TOMAS. IDe'-0' 11 : '`ono TENANT SIGNAGE TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT °PYLON SIGN Germ. wan NICOUNINIpo vp weal BAST $.NATION Jaw PRE1931 !ETA. rovsas HagOt. TD X�1c , cro m ,PRE'RLI£fAL Gu HA:E WEN 6ATe5 MAE OTRA5F1 BNLI.OSURB BI.NATIONS $IDE / REAR °ICY PLAN firm IL95—%:E7 P. m., 65'-0• CDSOiRH EL NATION N4•.1,-0. -ate IlIUI1 I -c. ON^JRTN BLNATION covRr __ 1 BAGS OP PRGar limo 7� 11 4 .: . TRASH MEST BL— NATION Ow..owe PLAN ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. 991 North Thad Wrest, &4e 22D 6t2-436 -4030 I.inrwa cis, NN 55401 Fax G12.4302-0960 Mask Reaisinn. / icor Dafr =Tr SUBMITTAL REV151rnt 05.04-01 06.164 ar2]4i LINO LAKES - AZURE PROPERTIES LINO LAKES, MN RETAIL BLDG- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / FLOOR PLAN tBSUED DATE LRAPl1 n., BL CAECA= 151, KAL Al Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2007 ..,. ® . - --� . _ _ TENANT _w 1�_�11.1 li 11111_11111111 11111_1111f1111_ 111_ I 11� IiIf i= _ .�1 , .s ALLl1 BAST $.NATION Jaw PRE1931 !ETA. rovsas HagOt. TD X�1c , cro m ,PRE'RLI£fAL Gu HA:E WEN 6ATe5 MAE OTRA5F1 BNLI.OSURB BI.NATIONS $IDE / REAR °ICY PLAN firm IL95—%:E7 P. m., 65'-0• CDSOiRH EL NATION N4•.1,-0. -ate IlIUI1 I -c. ON^JRTN BLNATION covRr __ 1 BAGS OP PRGar limo 7� 11 4 .: . TRASH MEST BL— NATION Ow..owe PLAN ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. 991 North Thad Wrest, &4e 22D 6t2-436 -4030 I.inrwa cis, NN 55401 Fax G12.4302-0960 Mask Reaisinn. / icor Dafr =Tr SUBMITTAL REV151rnt 05.04-01 06.164 ar2]4i LINO LAKES - AZURE PROPERTIES LINO LAKES, MN RETAIL BLDG- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / FLOOR PLAN tBSUED DATE LRAPl1 n., BL CAECA= 151, KAL Al Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2007 • • • • 17000RAT1VE usms TRAso x1= -1'1= =ENNIIi4-0mI Ii 4' 1.146H RCOK =1= '6' maw immimism mow lima mos am_ n OCK trAx 501rfH NATION WWI :OM _120' -0" 120L -0' ``TR4e6 " m o t O116T ELEVATION SO B 100' -0" T J, IOOi -D° COMO !0o• -o. IR4 0. FRONT 50r OT = NATI;7N =1. 11101 \•. A.{.1.1•7. L.- T13.1 =II5 M11111 s HON BLOCK iB R.F. )3LCCK- 2!.01.011 l L A L 192/OR PLAN J L J J J NORTH ELEVATION far/0 To nsiol TRASH. R•:1-09.JIZ �NAT1ONS c I.LAN (POR ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM LL.c. 901 No[th Thad Sweet, SJts 220 612.436-4030 Womanises, 69455401 Ea+c612i02A960 Mark Revision/ Issue Date Carr 599911 .4 GM' Saxrr4 nevelort 01.-1,or m-04-ar I0-]2-0T LINO LAKES - AZURE PROPERTIES LINO LAKES, MN 6,520 SF RETAIL BLDG EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / FLOOR PLAN PR4.CT N.F11594 05■00X.02 W01.1017. DATE 10-22 -01 CAClACGC, WC, ICA A2 Architectural Consortium, LLC. 2007 • • • • 0 0 16.-0. 1 ®'-Cr -O' 5' -0• I a'-b' . a'-4' 4'-0 1/2' 4'-4' 7' -0' 4•-4' II* -Cm a' -0' 6'-Cm 2' -0•jj 22'-4• 2 -0' a -O' 416'/ C I V \/ RLT'IOE E.'S' LENS- 1 UNPINS • ALL EXT. DOORS IVI Ax. 2E SOPE WY FROM iLILVIN6 J 1 m 0 _ LIME OF oVERHA'AI• AEC& - - \=�� I \ _ L. BO _� • T • /. le/ .. i M _ Q PRODUCT s-r 6j S/ � �� 04 1 ` . 1trcNiNb LAATE2 5JBN1M. PR VIE 20`4 - ROOF AGli+S ROOM D R = INSTALL 12' MIt611L. _ m 4 I �� 6 102 AI ..qq , V(STlw _e ® ! O O et o 7'ELiM£U32 t {/• .i l r n' `� O _ p i 1 O 1 I D' -10'' E' -0' I I I 1 I I Li 1 i!'� i/4'-11- ' __ < I � ae A /T�P)_� s (i) ® l -/ 91.4- O � © ( •< �SI� C3 1 �r � . -ti nI Dl MI i 1 a {-9 L/2' 25'ro• I p -� ® O �{ BRAILLE L 1 Q 1 N 1 L . 4 ! _ ^ 1 PICTURE MELT l AVAILABILITY 7'-3 1/2' 15' -T `s � -- T7'-10 °' �!� SIONABE ,O'-0' E 12I-IT' } _ --� D0TF UNGER FOR O I SUPPORT. M + I� 1+ r 1 I Q ' I rcoLER FTC- I. - n Lag 81 0 '_- I , LJ - I _N al. P�cN I® 11 7O Imo_ --�- _�J t.� 0 o 018/ iTM a• -0' 0 55 _ y _ - - - - - 'T EXTENT OF CUSTONIER ABOVE SERV! CE AVE" 1 1 ,- PEa•D. CLEAR /,A>MA5 . FINISH FAI.E 4•_2• 6, -D• 16' o rt T ;I , I O-) _ :9 n I * /1 YALAIL(E ! 1OD o T ABOVE • Ea MANA6EI`5 _iT FEA HEADER E HEADER -p1 1 ,saJ r' {ABaE 1 1 DI 1 A, p p C3 12'-4• inh 11 L _1 © a 54j' 1 1 '-4 UT l2' -1 7/2' (>, -0• a' -D 1/2' D 3'-4. n O 'p 1 ®1 Q K[TGF°J -t R i1O51 Q EXHAUST FU4.1 ABOVE If I O�"j(I .i I'J i {{ L' STAFF AS51STAI�LE r 1 SEE DOL �t-'�- E. _ i �� BE - SAFE TIP GLASS GLASS p eV © I '0 714 O' < Q F 4 • ^� IL- - - 1 -b b/2• = SI614MbE _ Q A SEE KITR'AMBd AHD Mm '�- [L. SEE CI FOR /.AHD Sem LINE- Cr A 2 O ® V55TIBJL - N'` V_ _" J�`•.\ \ \`�~ \ \\ \ O '.......\ V -\ , < a' 1 IMFORMAnON. 4' �� _ • IO �_ Q _NI�L -5 /2' Q I 4' -7' 2' -4' -j' o PIZS9Ri6i t• 106 G7 STCJkPJR q dir' FoR A GNg K7TY181 5Mim7 FOR ADDITtONAi IIFGT214AnON. -- •;7� Q O a, - ' < �� B Q PM 1 L76_T © OIi9HL 11 © - m ' _ CONTROL PANEL -. 1 Ai - _ -[• -B- ` J `\ I O L �. fiIDE 5•43• LE.B LANDINS • ALL EXT. excess N/I'IAX. (-- SO• ATT FILLET, STEEL J PIPE BOLLARD. i (TTF. FOR 2) L ,O' -0' A T• -5 1/2' X O 4'-O' • El 40' -11' X O 4' -0 • 2'-4 .IE• REFER TO K- �'IS ' IT SFIS ! EF- CLC FOR 1W-O MA ION ON -( JMALL OPENIN6� n PRTVITE MCP FIT.AER t 12'D+[12'N SIB` Zg' -2` 52• -7. FROM t3UI !LD 51• -0• iE•/ V 109.-0' PETAL RATLIKE SEE DETAIL 11/A6.0 1 FLOOR PLAN 1.0 1/4 ° =1' -D° ' e � b.,, t( . ----, 4 ^O':` 8- :..... t°.'E. m .- M sue. 'r .w5 4.5:% L+i, - - �= 2f -.. SL.S' V.A.YaIA. o i - - ^° -, >'*'� `2 .^""'f -: 0 G 5: TG, -� -- .___r. . ._ - .. :. Mr .AI: - � ® 4-14 ..,1= c'..A`V POOR FINISH AS YemEoULS, / KEY NOTES ARCADE WALL ASSEMBLY IC �14,�..;,c. m I. DIl9SIREU VSRIPT N/RA_LEiTON VOSS. FOR SHELL 1 C. RRJ..(3ZIO,l RETAILS .S. 91S �I(l 1 POLL A� !R[T TffzT 1. RLAINABE E.[.F.S. 57579.1 (NTT BARRIER/ GOIS[STJIYa OF 1 I/2. GIN LATH INSULATION BUILD IC LLT RASIENED OVER - OR PLTRIOOD. INSTALL PEI LOLL_ CODRi AfLJ MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. 2. Pl ABLE BUILDING MAP CHEI Ec.BttOR ERADE PLYWOOD. B. 2eb f4RAM[N6 • Ib• NOM STUD O.G. OVER EXTERIOR MALL A�'�T [SAE: FgOfU. '.T�' IPQ WALL ASSEMBLY PANEL.) -✓ LT.. •. '1 .1 F -...Y- FM DEMrssecr emE'.a" +^'OI'Y eT - 8+ "J - _ 7er '. . - . :F AYNI,L° ABODE -BY O1U43S 6.G. TO PROVIDE 4`,.L`,8' -0' mom STAILI.�S 571$ 0 CF FINISH I DINS. S o TO WISE COLUMN 12�8CE INTERIOR D < SURAR FACE FA OF F NISH. a DM1Sa115E N0f®. INT9I7 RL DAIS. ARE TD FACE 1L FINISH. 2. 5L H LLESerON DETAILS FOR EXTERIOR MALL ASSENE_IY TYPES 5. FULLERTON D•lG. FRt MIFGVN TYPE 4. 5� 444 T A6.D FOR DOOR t ROOM FINISH y�+'I. ace 5. °$ SITE PLAN FOR 57D9W./3, R+A7f5, ETC. 6. EC TO PROVIDE 404 S3ENAF2 PAGI'.AEE AND INSTALL SLdb AT _ BY LOCATIONS LOfN_ LODGP05IT1Q'S INDICATED /N PAOKAFE OR A5 TEST![7� SIANAOF PAOX.IFF SUPPLIED 9T, � ) <!,1 t 4' -C• 4 G. 0rT0+ 2 WART AT ALL F L[LAnO* IN K f "MIA OOfiQb STARTINE AT FINISH FLOOR. ATTACH W/TGOD PSG INTO WD. BLOICIN6 - BIILLNF LOVE SASE MERE TILE '-'- S.S. CORNER. DETAILS 9 / 10 ON SHEET A6.0. G01YR -FE ER/1 PeEITI PAD - FNLLBtTON 18 S. w A- - ) s'-':... ,,,E,7x` �. 4 .--1 F'J-t. F UEST'1*'PIN .1 ,,T' -..T ,;. 0` R.-N.) - u, ry.C. ✓x. T1-..;' DT° ? . p; F >- AE 'a.; R'.. .._ Y ;. - - u+.,, +. .:i0Ni, YT° :. ilk,LE..: teRED ... S,iE .�[ .!>,= .R s: ;;z _.. c , s;),a .I:. 144 - - •• _ ,,, .+-i....,ht. ,.. w.i., 1. TWIN Et2i6. VENT R DY HA -LERTW NIE FlOAM B.ACI.EI I VAF{7R BAiaRIEL 2. PERMEABLE E R LOCAL LL WRAP DYER !OR ERAOE Ecs. O. ILSTAEL PER LCr V_ fdD'� AND MWJPAGTUFB£ S`ECb. 9. 2°5 NOM STUD ImHb . IaE O. c. tIIITN GOItTJNY7Fi a PARTITION 4. HATT INSULATION (R VALUE 141. 5. VAPOR BARRIER 6. SEE FLLL.EZTON DETAIL& FOR INTERIOR MALL TTP5. T. SEE F4AL0ITO1 11ETAILS FOR FINISH 5QQa8P DRARSTOP/F1�r00 BL:MINE AT FIN15N CEIL7NE LEVEL. WINDOW 44. BLY 1' T .ra4A-a16N 1- 5L1'>- 214 -6'165 pY�STc BOX 566 Mwe..forreetopTeoelgn.com Pl9f NT 16602 T. MAXIMUM D AND I'T ALL TO BE POSTS. PER LOCAL OODr SIEN FlUI3.f3511ED A,� II6TALL2 By E@BiAL CONTRA. "IDR. .�,���y ��1��� S i 1 ,WL LE5EN✓ DECORATIVE cEILJN6 I-maxTl87f - �..e'e DECOR NE ONES. FOE AODITIONN_ IIELfe4ATl di. '� L°_J DROPPED SGP2T ABOVE -°' REFLECTED [E7LINS PLAN lo,ea ESG02 PILL SOX PERM u m ITEM 44.0O) OPTIONV- BULK OIL FILL BOX (EOFF °"°'•" F 1721 P. 700.16)-CONFIRM USE IVM'DQW_D'S PROJECT IVNADEIE © RGSF ACQYP LADDER WHATc-1 ABOVE -5= FiL.LHZi118 STRKTIIRAL fRAM[N6 PLAN POI LCYATIIiE D1,IBSIOIS TRELLIS SYSTEM ABOVE 0 SEE ruLLERTOJ DETAILS FOR NTREP [ DIMENSIONS O PARTITION TYPE TAR '$ 2/AI.0 ....= DRAFT STDPPIN6 - SEE 2/A1.0 ) DOOR TA6 - SEE DOOR c..s.Tai m ON 66.0 [SPANK MALL TILE AT CSTOI104 SERVICE AND KLTC" -- O B2L•INE Ai E/6 -70 E COORDINATED H/F1NAL OMITS DecoR SCHEME R WeDDNUS's PROJECT +AAE © MOTE ;"'' - ,,. I,@.L ALL mom= FIN29i.a - .. TO E PROVIDED Of 6.G. %PARTIAL HT. PARTITION DETAIL Et�1 ALL INIELFN.1t RSIf!'3RS+ •' -'' "- - , 10 E FROVIDEO BY B.G. 1. ARCO. ALUMINUM RIME. TNERf40LLT BROKEN. 2. I' INSULATED 6LAZIw_ SEE SHEETS AIX I Al -I, ALSO FEJ_MITON LETAILS FOR LOCATIChS OF SAFETY ELASS, 5. PROVIDE FLA5HIN6 AT JAME MEAD I SILL WEND DAMS, GO4T. SaAtJilt'T. INTERIOR PAR'TI TI ON -PEPPERED iAY N]NDVh A557QY PJL13[fOM _ i_ FOR t OILY - TO BE t .0 ht.! . S. `� REORDER DT PLILLOCTON 3/4°.1'-C' FOR RI>>�rE ONR.T - TOE PRIM/MEP BT RILE WIN Mai 112, rlif11110 120121011171. MOM euewc TAN aThao-aeo nplelnllen Numb■ RESTAURANT UNO LAKES, MINNESOTA FLOOR PLAN DATE /MUM DRAMRt to JYN CHECKED He JYM M8 N0_ 47044 A1e0 • • • • • 0' -0' IS' -0' COLD STORAEE ROOM IECI U c MGM/1M NAMER SERVICE. PROVIDE 20'0 60' 012. SPACE RO7FNOON 116 T'-5 U/2' M 15, -T• 7 1® COOLER il0 MATME02'S AIEA, -- 10211 tog BOTTOM OF • '7 • T. --2' A. F.F �J O 6' -0' � ICHSEAR LI5HTING� CONTML PA/8 / 4' -0' 5 -2' 5 -P' T7}' 05 •T -2' A.F.F. 2' -1 142' 6' -5 112' .�ay�T_ye' n 4, ® r . FLOOR PLAN FILLED 51 PIPE BOLLARD. (DTP, FOR 2) 70'-0' X 0 '/'-5 1/2' 4 1/4 " =1' -0" KEY NOTES a cti ra AP4IN6 ABOVE -BY ODIERS 6.G. 7O PROVIDE 4':•4.15' -0' HIS" STAIN S STEEL CORER BU4JZff AT ALL EXPOSED_ L4.ATI156 IN KITME MUPPORT AREA CORNERS STNITINS AT FINISH FLOOR. ATTACH N/ICLD 5688 INTO M. HlYJ"IN5 - SULI./CBE COL": BASE MERE TILE TLZS 5.5. CORNER. Sig., DETAILS 4 R 10 ON 61$T A6.0. GOKOSTE EQUIPMENT PAD - FII L ERTON DAM. SUSSES DECORATIVE 0=1L1N5 TREATMENT -5. DECOR PASS. FOR ADDITIONAL INERTATION. 115 PROPPED SOFFIT ABOVE -S(£ REFLECTED 001ILIT6 PLAN UPS CO2 FILL BOX (°1114 SCHEDULE l7E4 4A.W5 rm EMTIO AL BULK OIL FILL BOX (FAN 50EOLAP 1795 105.10) -000P1 4 115E P'l PLD'S PST MANAGER WO ROTA ACAS LADDER IVHATGH ABOVE -SEE FLLLHZRM'S 5TN0G7I/RAL MAMMA PLAN FOR LOcAT1145 DIMENSIONS S T581.LS S.YSTE4 ABOVE SEE 9.LLERTON NAILS FOR UNITE 1 DIMENSIONS IMPEDED EL AM MINCED' 655548_: -5= 79 LL°EION DETAILS a At AP NALL AGSH"fBLY SEE FULL3RTON DETAILS FOR EXTERIOR NAIL A55B'® -Ir TYPu 1. ORAINAM 0.1.0.5. 515151 (NOT BARRIER) COI'SISTIM OF I 1/2' INSULATION PE-04M0ICALLY FASTENS 0188 TEL. OR PLASTIC LATH 04ER BUILDING FAP02 OVER ERIERIOR SRAM 1575000. INSTALL PER LOCAL GORE AND NUNIFAGT7R86 SPECIFICATIONS. 2. PERMEABLE BUILDINS TRAP OVER EXTERIOR ERiAOE PLYNRm. 5. 257b MOO SUP UTMMMA& • 16' 0.G. OVER 105705102 PALL AS ELT (ME SON). EXTERIOR PALL ASSEIeLY (AP.) I. "MIN BRICK VENEER BY 00.7. 105 NI' FOAM SACLEL / VAPOR 50RRI02 2. PISNEAE.E BUILDER AMP OVER EXTERIOR GRADE PLYIC700. InsTALL PER LOYAL COOS AND MANIFACTUREES SPECS. B. 2"6' ICED STUD FRAMING • 76' O.L. (WITH CONTINJ05 R PARTITION 56lSULE. 4. 51TT i0SUL.ATION (R VALUE . 5. VAPOR 00051ER 6. SEE F1L}.02T0N DETAILS FOR INTERIOR PALL '750°5. 1. SEE FULLRf01 DETAILS FOR FINISH SCIDEILLE EMAFT5T0o/FIRESTOP BLDCKINS AT FINISH CEIL7N5 L05E -. NI NDOPI ASSE.4,312f 1. MOO. ALUMNI-4f FRASE. 118dNALLT BROKEN. 2. 1' INSULATED OLAZIN6. SEE MIMES AI.0 R A1.), ALSO AL-LISTER DETAILS FOR LOCATIONS OF SAFPTT SLAM. 5. PRO /IVE F9..ASNIN6 AT JANET /SAD R SILL 1 /5• DAMS' CONT. MALAWI. SENEi2AL NOTES I. DIMENSIONS' VSIIP A/FULLERTON 07155. FOR SHELL t CORE. PJ70570R DINS. ARE TO COLUMN REFERENCE LING t 0771E. FACE CF FINISH ALMS OT7ERAISE wimp. INTERIOR DIMS. ARE TO FACE OF FINISH. 2. SEE 51151.0579/ DETAILS FOR EXTERIOR ANL A5501L1T WPM B. 00 Fl.1.SSR7N MISS. FOR MEW" TYPE_ 4. SEE 9057 A6.0 FCR DOOR t 141011 P7NI9H scasouLm 5. S(£ SITE PLAN MR SIDEWALKS, RAMS, ETC. 6. SC TO PROVIDE A0A S16Nt1 PACKAEE AND INSTALL S1PJ6 AT LOGATI06 ATP POSITIQ6 ENPICATE5 IN 0000700 OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL WOES. 5IMMS PA ZAM 9LIPLIED BY' ropms7 P0S4A31EN Wig- 60 -214 -6765 4242 1ST ST., BOX 500 .FOmsstp•rw.siyn.cos 1EN MICHELLE, NY 106[0 1. MAXIMUM CCQJPANGT 516N TO EE POSTED PER LOCAL cam 5165 FURNISHED ATP INSTALLED BT 50' i7L 09t:R6-TOR. SYMBOL LEISENP FARM'S.' TYPE TM SEE 2/AI.0 DRAFT STOP-FINS - SEE 2161.0 Os DOOR TAG - SEE DOOR SHEELLE OR A6.0 O CERAMIC NALL 71LE AT 0157080 SERVICE AND KITCHEN MANIAS ACAS -70 BE GOOTZDINATED A/FINAL MAINS 0E0OR SCHEME a 57000. LO'5 PROJECT HAMMER MY NOTE iIo &goat 931,111. RX Nsn•e 0111•011117C - 97 mlm RIN.•.1L Ns Gam PIUG 1119-...4044 IA4 .111..21,_.0 ".om,.lb. Numbs mE 07052 =be RESTAURANT ^°'"TO "� '°"' •'''"." McDONALD'S (y\. McDonald's USA, LLC SITE neve ha.Ypo ad abnl Ire AI mndmlid 4 �°M1•P"Vr M DOV W. NY .ntl .IM Ml t r ,+mmn.m.n we .non We n. m. IJNO LAKES, MINNESOTA n.b�M Um.ro, b sue... and .dam. �me•0•`" l.r ,. m 9 Mlhmil nn w m 0 Isla lbw. 4.. . Dm. tlrme•p la or merry a owns m Mpals e..p.l requinte IN yen*. elqineenr. Rorpructlen of IN eanlioct imam re. sdh� pnrd M ml MM1alot FLOOR PLAN DATE 691!9 DRAWN BY CHECKED BT JOB ND. 0044 SAHA QM A1.1 • • • _rig I€ 3100 ill 5111 51 X11111111111111111111111 Ii il�ti',`'� `g g; Est ERNA %Th M1l87htT j6WAT!GH 3/16° =I'-0' 1010. 11000 - 10091 09)11)4 00001. W. 'N R 0011/007/6 01R110 10 10140 00418E 117. MO ER spasms `(m. 01 716107 901 0.001. 10.18114 100 50[ @ `1,112 511.010 S0)W 9 , 67 04.91 [4 1505_ 2 \ RIC-IT SIb_ ON 3/16' =I' -0' GLUM 01 01 MIN @� 160L 11 0070 - M Ns.M. 0110210' Mips �� 0 carnal .01111, @TALL 10K.l 0 0 CIR K1101 17900 =Or - 001%7 11 10704 CO.OR 04 100007119 1010115. 00?. 11bL0101 015(04 101701 !a6 00400714 000 .51011011£ 112 -70 OR @ML. 1143 012,- 000 113104 0.0117L4 LE 1101 414A01 9ROMN- 0.1.0 OIL RILL 00 00171 0661112 1101 700.49 - 0001111 194 44114574 0001 10100112 0 to L1047 010100 001 0000 - OC 4000 10)10. 1-1191700 - Rf 01109 •101 01-1-007 0915.'960111% 00.40.004 - 001090 flow.; I®F GAR 0000 OR 00191 0 0 RLOF 090114 o0 04 0111 MIIR 1D 75104 00010100119 10100000 9700110 0101040 R � �0 101.0. 14.E 04 1H15 5164. 0.111006 1190.15 10MgLIS 715040 101.15 949104 056 MU- 001A 0184119 011061 .09. - !$ /0001 40110 4H 007 01 t`7 7000007 d.ItXa 0410-110. 111010011 7604? /4001. - (4 1001 490 . 0011116. MD slit 19TH R9 necusr 5401 0001045 1740110 1920.4 (0000: (.1)4 .R7N%7 PL711070 0014 4 011 51 i% 1101 01/109 0010 11.00 000 R CO. `911.1.5 51.1100 R1.4710 LGR LR • ll117 to RIO1 4 STPLICTURi- NOI'Et ROOT 009070 09014 MALL 091005 10 OE 1.00140 51111 510190.5 000. 406I10I01104 11.111082 Al. 0.1.44401®1111145101 1111.1.000020 100 1.0001•11 00011C 311111 Soar vat FL% N17,131.0.0 z cc Vi w (1 cl z z Q z v 0 z po S U..1 z n1 3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS J � §1i41s: rear • s €� c { O Ss - B l DATE =LIED 09040 9? 0190010 0)4 44111 442(4 07064 A2.0 • • K.01/ ;) d %," ;'7 •r • 187AL ID - 1A052 90188_ 1,18177. 7D x A 71 5110 101 18 70 141 511410E 12. A1O * ICY 00.11 - l40R • NJM1111 Au11 �. )3S.L TION •101514 178181 (5.1.5.5.) (Q.Ot • 2122A4101 RICE 801 11411E 2122 -'70' OR mat AL1101111 Ir8a15 0510E -1110 KIWI 07 WADI Ab295 - 505104 l*). OPTIONS, MD SUE NIIN Nm 18 07 14448 ER O•7126 4004 ; II sea MAX (500.1; AIR D.ROAI41 5L1 A11I907 * t 82 9O IN M �>i. 094115 (no.E Rem 0Y Orce `SLIM O1. R. • 0571 2047 ID 1gT Lpc LEFT ID 1219:: 1M0O 7 MYRA SIMR DOS OflS TO It 05555150 11(1H 1180■8S AIWA COISTRY.TIO4 MAAa®R Mo 0110 881132 IRIi1 518 1888008 wee reereeme seem mule ARM VC s UNO LAKES, MINNESOTA EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OAlE ISS0ED DRAWN 57 JNN CHECKED Ri JON JOB N0. 07084 A2.1 • • Y.011 1) p12..,7 • • SZEME K EZACT woe .. OF ALL MRS AL-1 Ac —s 6 —, „, • A90 000R 0001 ER lm■ m ■ ■ ■ ■■� ■�■■ ■■ / / /// // / / /// MM // SEE n FDA 5= SERVE mUre+A?rt AmaL1AE ROTE AIL 06£11016 D6LVAC AID MOM Sr 0M61 (TPA HECK—our • 15 ' Ct FIXTURE FLOOR PLAN ❑ ❑LARSON ❑ A R C H I T E C T 300 N. 2ND. ST. #225 La Crosse, WI 54601 (608) 784 - 6808 FAX (608) 784 - 6599 ASS Th/P STORES 7wIK STA, STORES 96'x54` RH STANDARD AWp AoteralAsiesogaleAse.raaFAssamor 1--ncr .1.1.41 .AS.ACU.A0 ,AD,AILACAU.uAAu ks Reviled : Date : Chocked : TPL Drawn :AL Project # : 0 A5 ❑ ❑ C MOD e' IDSE a MAIDE 5. +7f OAFS r WE ROTE AIL 06£11016 D6LVAC AID MOM Sr 0M61 (TPA HECK—our • 15 ' Ct FIXTURE FLOOR PLAN ❑ ❑LARSON ❑ A R C H I T E C T 300 N. 2ND. ST. #225 La Crosse, WI 54601 (608) 784 - 6808 FAX (608) 784 - 6599 ASS Th/P STORES 7wIK STA, STORES 96'x54` RH STANDARD AWp AoteralAsiesogaleAse.raaFAssamor 1--ncr .1.1.41 .AS.ACU.A0 ,AD,AILACAU.uAAu ks Reviled : Date : Chocked : TPL Drawn :AL Project # : 0 A5 ❑ ❑ N SIUCLO CAR WASH BACK ELEVATION 114/1 BLEW. BULB C RED 111/1/4171 . II .IIIII11114r11111111111111AIIJ IIIIII I111.11111111IIIIIIII1J,11!I. 11 IIII:IJ111I111,11111 N: BRICK =BOER CI. CAR WASH LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 0 ❑LARSON ❑ABCH]TECT • RED ImRCr Revise: AM 9, 07 Date: MAR 6,07 TPL Draws TPL Pmlca tF: TAB BACK SWUM ORBS Ia„IEDahl» TIM RR= RED FRICK 1rs- STORE TRASH ENCLOSURE STORE 1 Y KWIK TRIP STORES LINO LAKES, MN. GAS ISLAND CANOPY C7 • FRONT ELEVATION • fill I 111111"111111111111 .1111111 TAN BRICK FRICK 111 II11 W 11 tl1 11111 I I I OO m -1111111 mnH HHH 1 ununil iHHHHHHHmmIHm 1111111 RIGHT .SIDE ELEVATION 0 ❑LARSON ❑AP. CN1TECT • R. -vixa APR 4, 07 Datc: MAR 6, 07 ch i. T Draw= TPL tr: STORE 0411III I I I I I I I I;W.IPIjtl'1'I1I II1,1111l1111TIJ 11111 TRASH ENCLOSURE 1�« 1. WOLK SMEIER CAR WASH was KWIK TRIP STORES LINO LAKES, MN. • • RE • NOV CITY O L 9 2007 _JNO LAKES IN STREET COUNTY ROAD 84 OFFER LAKE ROAD •1114 SONAR DRIVE THRU MCDONALD•S 4507 SF 2 RETAIL 6500 SF� RASH O ® E1\ Met SLY/ 2E J sr 0051160 BUILDING 1=l PRP 18-0 i, 9 x I A ® GA5 PUMPS LIm OVERHEAD CANOPY _J PI ZNEERengineering intesta 41„im4 1 8949 TRIP 5285 5F 2 RETAIL 18.200 SF CIVIL ERS LAND PLNN'FAS LAND L.AVEYOAS 1,4250.P£ AaONFl7S 2422 Eotcrydsc Chive Mendota Heights. AIN 55120 (651)6651914 6s681 -9488 Coon Rapids Office 201 85th Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids. AN 55433 (763) 783-1890 F94:783.1883 O 43s NIA N itrry ANDCL�D:NT REVISIONS. 1. CITY REVISIONS. OUTLOT C 1 hereby citify Las this Plan was mowed 65 OC or undamy direct supsnision and Natl N°"e DouglasAStahl m, a duly Lim°N Professional Engineer muter tc laws of the Su= of Minns... Reg. H. (9584 Ds 5,3/07 OUTLOT D OUTLOT B OUTLOT B PARKING LOT PAVEMENT SECTION 8612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET CURB TYPES DENOTES B612 TIP OUT CURB & GUTTER DENOTES B612 CURB & GUTTER (SEE SITE PLAN FOR SURMOUNTABLE CURB AREAS) NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB. SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA — 10.08 AC. (EXCLUDING OUTLOTS B & D AND R.O.W.) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA — 6.06 AC (60.1% OF TOTAL) PARKING SUMMARY FOR McDONALDS /RETAIL 69 PARKING STALLS 4 HANDICAP PARKING STALLS 73 TOTAL STALLS 1.5" TYPE BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE MVWE450358 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 2" TYPE BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE MVN4f3503513 8- CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 0612 CURB—. 6c GUTTER Date SRR7 Designed DAS Dann SAG PRELIMINARY SI1'h PLAN DROP CURB DROP CURB AT CATCH BASIN AZURE 4 PROPERTIES � : l ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA INSTALL STAKED 500 FOR SOIL STABILIZATION ( ----UI e CATCH BASIN SECTION A —A // / /,, RIM ELE/ =100.50 • ELEV.= 39.95 EL—.T, 99.9 MAIN STREET VILLAGE LINO LADS. MINNESOTA 1 OF 1 • • • RECEIVED NOV 1 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES From Azure Lino Lakes Site Plan Showing Internal Intersection Numbering • • • • • RECEIVED NOV 1 9 2007 r.rrt of LUN o • Azure Lino Lakes Site Added Volumes 2 ca rt 'P2i 9)1E1 a0140 U) U) m U U W ca c O Do 2 z o° C 96- cDonald's Access 617 L8 I.- W c CN O S-OSC '-OS E—Z5l �ZO 6 ZO tiZ- 7'r- 0-, T (0 r U U U) 0) vi co 0 -1769 Z-. N(-1 £ZZ-> ti 0) • • • • CAR WASH 1 — 1 ( ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r riT, I °IIF�I.l°l ONE -WAY I 1 1 Vi 1 I 1 I 1 1 I fgV 1 11 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 C1' 1 1 I McDONALD'S 4,281 S.F.± '//'& ii ii r/r r/i i i irii rr ?ill/7/,J V U /L 1/ L !1 !L ! L /L / L / U C 1 /1 / 1!1! !! a r L /J r ® ® r rim Eno I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ifs 5\ RECEIVED NOV 1 9 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES I i I I Trr I I 1 -0 L L r I c L • • • • vil e -mg`, ONE —WAY C� 0 0 fgltol M�vr< -'1 \ lacaoo Ioc o cal IOc oa1l �I) — l U cc 1 e'4 I I I g1 I 1 Gy' f I I "1 1 1 g.z,J I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I V 51 LINIFcci ■ McDONALD'S 4,281 S.F.± r L 11 J • • • • AGENDA ITEM V E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: December 12, 2007 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Ordinance Amendment Section 3, Subd. 4 Adding Time Limit For Completion of Work On Building Exterior BACKGROUND There have been a number of instances around the city in which property owners obtain building permits but then the work is not completed for extended periods of time. When this leaves unfinished work on the exterior of the building, it can be an eyesore for neighboring property owners and lead to deterioration of building materials. Staff is proposing an amendment to the zoning ordinance that would add a time limit for completion of work on building exteriors. ANALYSIS The proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance would require that work on the exterior of a building be completed within a specified amount of time after the building permit is issued. The time period is longer for larger multifamily buildings and commercial buildings. The zoning ordinance currently includes time frames for conditional use permits: work must begin within one year and "substantial construction" must take place within three years. For site plans, work must begin within six months. These do not address completing exterior building work and a project that is not part of a CUP or site plan review has no time frame requirements at all. Section 3 of the zoning ordinance is the general provisions. Subdivsion 4. addresses general building and use provisions, and 4.B. includes standards for five categories of structures: single family dwellings; two family and townhomes; multiple family apartments; commercial, industrial and institutional; and quasi- public structures (lights, utility poles, etc.). The proposed ordinance amendment would be added as Section 3, Subdivision 4.B.6. As this amendment to the zoning ordinance originates with staff, there is no applicant. However, an amendment to the ordinance requires a public hearing to allow for public comment. A notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper as required. Following a recommendation by the P & Z Board, staff will present the proposed amendment to the City Council. An ordinance requires two readings (and • • • votes) by the City Council. It then is published in the newspaper and becomes effective thirty days later. Proposed new text is shown underlined. SECTION 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS Subd. 4 General Building and Use Provisions. B. Building Type and Construction. 6. Completion of Exterior Improvements a. All exterior improvements of a structure, or portion thereof, to single family dwellings, multiple family dwellings of twelve (12) units or less, or any structure accessory to a residential use shall be completed in accordance with City- approved construction plans within one hundred eighty (180) days after the date the City issued the building permit. b. All exterior improvements of a structure, or portion thereof, to multiple family dwellings of more than twelve (12) units or any commercial, industrial, office, institutional or non - residential structure shall be completed in accordance with City- approved construction plans within one (1) year after the date the City issued the building permit. c. In all cases, the compliance deadline shall be upheld unless a written extension is submitted and approved by the Building Official. An extension may be granted in the event that a natural disaster or a calamitous event occurs which unavoidably delays the completion of the building project. OPTIONS 1. Recommend approval of zoning ordinance amendment as shown in this report. 2. Recommend denial of the zoning ordinance amendment. 3. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1